natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is without prejudice to other tasks given to SIRENE Bureaux based on respective legislation in the framework of police cooperation, e.g. in the application of the Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 December 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union (OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89).
za zaštitu povjerljivosti informacija potreban je poseban postupak.
Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) (OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p. 37).
Stoga se svaki kontakt među tijelima koja su odgovorna za nacionalnu sigurnost odvija odvojeno od kontakta među uredima SIRENE.
See also Schengen Catalogue, recommendations and best practices.
Stoga se o detaljnim razlozima za traženje oznake raspravlja izravno među tijelima odgovornima za nacionalnu sigurnost, a ne preko ureda SIRENE;
This second domain exists in the technical ‘pre-production environment’.
ako se pronađe podatak za upozorenje za koje se taj pronađeni podatak odmah mora prijaviti, treba bez odgode poslati obrazac G uredu SIRENE države članice izdavateljice.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31).
nadležno tijelo države članice izdavateljice donese odluku o brisanju.
Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p. 60).
Vidjeti odjeljak 9.
Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (OJ L 286, 1.11.2011, p. 1).
Obvezni elementi za opis identiteta pri provjeri višestrukih upozorenja o vozilu uključuju:
Certain transportation companies use other reference numbers.
broj registarskih pločica; i/ili
SIS II has a provision for entering serial numbers other than the BIC.
identifikacijski broj vozila (VIN).
Due to the lack of standardisation in serial numbers for objects it is possible, for example, for two different firearms of different makes to have the same serial number.
Oba broja mogu biti navedena u SIS-u II.
Equally it is possible for an object to have the same serial number as a very different object, for example, an issued document and a piece of industrial equipment.
Ako se, prilikom unosa novog upozorenja, utvrdi da isti VIN broj i/ili broj registarskih pločica već postoji u SIS-u II, pretpostavlja se da će novo upozorenje za posljedicu imati višestruka upozorenja o istom vozilu.
Where it is clear that the serial numbers are identical but the objects are clearly not the same no consultation between SIRENE Bureaux is required.
Međutim, taj način provjere učinkovit je samo ako su upotrijebljeni isti opisni elementi.
Users may be made aware that this situation can arise.
Usporedba stoga nije uvijek moguća.
Additionally, it is possible that an object, such as a passport or car, has been stolen and reported in one country and is subsequently reported in the country of origin.
Ured SIRENE upozorava korisnike na probleme koji se mogu pojaviti kad je samo jedan od brojeva uspoređen, na VIN blizance i na ponovnu uporabu registarskih pločica.
This could result in two alerts for the same object.
Pozitivan rezultat ne znači automatski da postoji pronađeni podatak, a negativan rezultat ne znači da ne postoji upozorenje o vozilu.
If this matter comes to light it may be resolved by the SIRENE Bureaux concerned.
Elementi za opis identiteta koji su upotrijebljeni za utvrđivanje postoje li dva jednaka unosa za isto vozilo detaljno su navedeni u odjeljku 2.2.3.
For the technical implementation see the Data exchange between SIRENE Bureaux document referred to in Section 1.10.2.
Postupci savjetovanja za provjeru višestrukih i neusklađenih upozorenja koje uredi SIRENE primjenjuju za vozila isti su kao i za osobe.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1345 of 4 August 2016 on minimum data quality standards for fingerprint records within the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (OJ L 213, 6.8.2016, p. 15).
Ured SIRENE države članice izdavateljice vodi evidenciju o svim zahtjevima za unos dodatnog upozorenja koji su, nakon savjetovanja, odbijeni na temelju prethodno navedenih odredaba, sve dok upozorenje ne bude obrisano.
See also Section 1.13.1 on indication of urgency in SIRENE forms.
Da bi se izbjegle negativne posljedice višekratnog oduzimanja originalno proizvedenih vozila s istim VIN brojem, primjenjuje se sljedeći posebni postupak:
Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77).
ako se utvrdi mogućnost VIN blizanca, ured SIRENE, prema potrebi:
Such enquiries shall not be made as a matter of routine.
i. u upozorenje dodaje povezanu primjedbu ‚Suspicion of clone’ [36] (Sumnja na klon);
The titles of the different sub-fields themselves are not to be included as part of field 083, but just the reference letter.
Odluke o SIS-u II.
When details are already available in the fields of an alert the information shall be included in the alert, including fingerprints or photographs.
S obzirom na to da je zahtjev hitan i da stoga nije moguće odmah usporediti sve informacije, nije potrebno ispuniti sva polja u obrascu P. Međutim, ulažu se napori radi usporedbe informacija u vezi s glavnim poljima: 041, 042, 043, 162, 164, 165, 166, 167 i 169.
In the case of the UK, the provisions in which the United Kingdom wished to take part (with exception of SIS) are applicable as of 1 January 2005 [7].The Schengen acquis was incorporated into the legal framework of the European Union by means of protocols attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam [8] in 1999.
Odluke o SIS-u II.
It applies the Schengen acquis with the derogation provided by its Act of Accession of 2011.
U tom slučaju, prije poduzimanja bilo kakvih mjera, korisnici sustava za automatsko prepoznavanje registarskih pločica provjeravaju odnosi li se podatak pronađen s pomoću tog sustava na upozorenje na temelju članka 36. ili 38.
On the basis of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [11], signed in 2008, the Principality of Liechtenstein became a member of the Schengen area on 19 December 2011.
Odluke o SIS-u II.
when notifying the issuing Member State of a match, the applicable alert article of the SIS II legal instruments shall be indicated in field 083 of the L form, including a mention using words to the effect of ‘SIS-AFIS match’.
kad je pronađen podatak i zatražena mjera poduzeta, ured SIRENE države članice koja je pronašla podatak obavješćuje ured SIRENE države članice izdavateljice o okolnostima pronađenog podatka s pomoću jednog obrasca G;
Once the Member State that entered the alert has agreed, the other Member State shall only use the data for the purpose for which it obtained authorisation.
Neka prijevozna poduzeća upotrebljavaju druge referentne brojeve.
It shall take account of any conditions set by the issuing Member State.
U SIS-u II postoji mogućnost unosa serijskih brojeva koji nisu brojevi BIC.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1532
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2017/1532
addressing questions regarding the comparative assessment of anticoagulant rodenticides in accordance with Article 23(5) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o razmatranju pitanja u pogledu usporednog ocjenjivanja antikoagulantnih rodenticida u skladu s člankom 23. stavkom 5.
(Text with EEA relevance)
Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products [1], and in particular first subparagraph of Article 23(5) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 528/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. svibnja 2012. o stavljanju na raspolaganje na tržištu i uporabi biocidnih proizvoda [1], a posebno njezin članak 23. stavak 5. prvi podstavak,
At the 60th meeting of representatives of Members States Competent Authorities for the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 held on 20 and 21 May 2015, all Member States submitted to the Commission a number of questions to be addressed at Union level in the context of the comparative assessment to be carried out at the renewal of anticoagulant rodenticide biocidal products (‘anticoagulant rodenticides’).
budući da:
The questions submitted were the following: (a) Is the chemical diversity of the active substances in authorised rodenticides in the Union adequate to minimise the occurrence of resistance in the target harmful organisms?; (b) For the different uses specified in the applications for renewal, are alternative authorised biocidal products or non-chemical means of control and prevention methods available?; (c) Do these alternatives present a significantly lower overall risk for human health, animal health and the environment?; d) Are these alternatives sufficiently effective?; (e) Do these alternatives present no other significant economic or practical disadvantages?
Na 60. sastanku predstavnika nadležnih tijela država članica za provedbu Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012, održanom 20. i 21. svibnja 2015., sve su države članice Komisiji dostavile niz pitanja koja se trebaju razmotriti na razini Unije u kontekstu usporednog ocjenjivanja koje treba provesti pri obnovi odobrenja za antikoagulantne rodenticidne biocidne proizvode (dalje u tekstu „antikoagulantni rodenticidi”).
The answers to these questions are relevant for any receiving competent authority for the purpose of deciding whether the criteria in Article 23(3)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 are met and, as a consequence, whether it shall prohibit or restrict the making available on the market or the use of anticoagulant rodenticides.
Dostavljena su sljedeća pitanja: (a) Je li kemijska raznolikost aktivnih tvari u odobrenim rodenticidima u Uniji dostatna da se pojava otpornosti u ciljnom štetnom organizmu svede na najnižu mjeru? (b) Jesu li dostupni alternativni biocidni proizvodi ili nekemijske metode nadzora i prevencije za različite uporabe navedene u zahtjevima za obnovu odobrenja? (c) Predstavljaju li te alternative znatno manji opći rizik za zdravlje ljudi, zdravlje životinja i okoliš? (d) Jesu li te alternative dovoljno učinkovite?
Pursuant to Article 75(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, the Commission requested from the European Chemicals Agency (‘Agency’) to formulate an opinion addressing the questions for the different uses that may be authorised in anticoagulant rodenticides according to the conditions and risk mitigation measures referred to in the opinions [2] adopted by the Biocidal Products Committee of the Agency at its 16th meeting for the renewal of the active substance approvals.
Uzrokuju li te alternative ikakve druge znatne ekonomske ili praktične poteškoće? (3) Odgovori na ta pitanja važni su svakom nadležnom tijelu primatelju za potrebe donošenja odluke o tome jesu li ispunjeni kriteriji iz članka 23. stavka 3. točaka (a) i (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 te treba li, slijedom toga, zabraniti ili ograničiti stavljanje na raspolaganje na tržištu ili uporabu antikoagulantnih rodenticida.
On 2 March 2017, the Biocidal Products Committee of the Agency adopted its opinion [3].
Komisija je na temelju članka 75. stavka 1. točke (g) Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 od Europske agencije za kemikalije (dalje u tekstu „Agencija”) zatražila izradu mišljenja u pogledu rješenja za različite uporabe antikoagulantnih rodenticida koje se smiju odobriti u skladu s uvjetima i mjerama za smanjivanje rizika navedenima u mišljenjima [2] koja je na 16. sastanku za obnovu odobrenja aktivne tvari donio Odbor za biocidne proizvode Agencije.
According to that opinion, in the absence of anticoagulant rodenticides, the use of rodenticide biocidal products containing other active substances would lead to an inadequate chemical diversity to minimize the occurrence of resistance in the target harmful organisms.
Odbor za biocidne proizvode Agencije donio je mišljenje [3] 2. ožujka 2017.
These products also showed some significant practical or economical disadvantages for the relevant uses.
Prema tom mišljenju, u nedostatku antikoagulantnih rodenticida uporaba rodenticidnih biocidnih proizvoda koji sadržavaju druge aktivne tvari uzrokovala bi kemijsku raznolikost nedostatnu da se pojava otpornosti u ciljnom štetnom organizmu svede na najnižu mjeru.
The opinion also considered a number of non-chemical control or prevention methods (‘non-chemical alternatives’), which may provide sufficient efficacy in certain circumstances on their own or in a combination of them.
Ti su proizvodi pri relevantnim uporabama uzrokovali i znatne praktične ili ekonomske poteškoće.
However, there is insufficient scientific evidence to prove that those non-chemical alternatives are sufficiently effective according to the criteria established in agreed Union guidance [4] with a view to prohibit or restrict the authorised uses of anticoagulant rodenticides.
U mišljenju je razmotren i određeni broj nekemijskih metoda nadzora i prevencije („nekemijske alternative”) koje u određenim okolnostima, same ili u kombinaciji, mogu biti dovoljno učinkovite.
Nevertheless the Commission notes the recommendation in the opinion that the use of non-chemical alternatives is a fundamental part of sustainable pest management for rodent control and proper use of anticoagulant rodenticides in accordance with Article 17(5) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Međutim, nema dovoljno znanstvenih dokaza o tome da su, prema kriterijima utvrđenima u smjernicama Unije [4] dogovorenima kako bi se zabranile ili ograničile odobrene uporabe antikoagulantnih rodenticida, te nekemijske alternative dovoljno učinkovite.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
Komisija ipak prima na znanje preporuku u mišljenju da je uporaba nekemijskih alternativa nezaobilazni element održive zaštite bilja u pogledu nadzora glodavaca i pravilne uporabe antikoagulantnih rodenticida u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 5.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012.
Article 1
Mjere predviđene ovom Odlukom u skladu su s mišljenjem Stalnog odbora za biocidne proizvode,
For the purpose of Article 23(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, the receiving competent authorities of the Member States shall consider the information addressing the questions referred to the Commission concerning the comparative assessment of anticoagulant rodenticide biocidal products provided in the Annex.
DONIJELA JE OVU ODLUKU:
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za potrebe članka 23. stavka 3.
Done at Brussels, 7 September 2017.
Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 nadležna tijela primatelji država članica moraju razmotriti podatke o razmatranju pitanja upućenih Komisiji povezane s usporednim ocjenjivanjem antikoagulantnih rodenticidnih biocidnih proizvoda koji su navedeni u Prilogu.
The President
Ova Odluka stupa na snagu dvadesetoga dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 7. rujna 2017.
Opinion ECHA/BPC/145/2017, available at https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/21680461/bpc_opinion_comparative-assessment_ar_en.pdf/bf81f0a5-3e95-6b7d-d601-37db9bb16fa5
Za Komisiju
Technical guidance note on Comparative assessment of biocidal products, available at https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/d309607f-f75b-46e7-acc4-1653cadcaf7e
Predsjednik
ANNEX
SL L 167, 27.6.2012., str. 1.
Information addressing the questions referred by Member States to the Commission concerning the comparative assessment of anticoagulant rodenticide biocidal products.
Mišljenje ECHA/BPC/145/2017 dostupno na https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/21680461/bpc_opinion_comparative-assessment_ar_en.pdf/bf81f0a5-3e95-6b7d-d601-37db9bb16fa5
For the purpose of those questions, the specified uses referred to in Article 23(3)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 are listed in Table 1.
Tehničke smjernice o usporednom ocjenjivanju biocidnih proizvoda, dostupne na https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/d309607f-f75b-46e7-acc4-1653cadcaf7e
Table 1
PRILOG
Specified uses for anticoagulant rodenticides
Podaci o razmatranju pitanja koja su Komisiji uputile države članice u pogledu usporednog ocjenjivanja antikoagulantnih rodenticidnih biocidnih proizvoda.
Use number
Za potrebe tih pitanja navedene uporabe iz članka 23. stavka 3. točke (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 navedene su u tablici 1.
Target organism(s)
Tablica 1.
Field of use
Navedene uporabe antikoagulantnih rodenticida
Category(ies) of users
Broj uporabe
Application method
Ciljni organizam/organizmi
Mus musculus (house mice)
Područje uporabe
(Other target organisms may be added)
Kategorija/Kategorije korisnika
Indoor
Metoda primjene
General public
Mus musculus (kućni miševi)
Ready-to-use bait to be used in tamper-resistant bait stations
(Mogu se dodati drugi ciljni organizmi)
Rattus norvegicus (brown rat)
U zatvorenome
Rattus rattus (black or roof rat)
Opća javnost
(Other target organisms — except house mice — may be added (e.g. voles))
Gotov mamac za uporabu u kutijama zaštićenima od neovlaštenog pristupa
Outdoor around buildings
Rattus norvegicus (smeđi štakor)
Professionals
Rattus rattus (crni ili tavanski štakor)
Trained professionals
(Mogu se dodati drugi ciljni organizmi, osim kućnih miševa (npr. voluharice))
Ready-to-use bait or Ready-to-use contact formulations
Na otvorenome oko zgrada
Ready-to-use bait
Profesionalci
Outdoor open areas
Osposobljeni profesionalci
Outdoor waste dumps
Gotov mamac ili gotove kontaktne formulacije
Sewers
Gotov mamac
Question (a): Is the chemical diversity of the active substances in authorised rodenticides in the EU adequate to minimise the occurrence of resistance in the target harmful organisms?
Otvoreni prostori
There are five approved active substances in biocidal products for product-type 14 with a mode of action different from that of anticoagulant rodenticides (alpha chloralose, aluminium phosphide releasing phosphine, carbon dioxide, hydrogen cyanide and powdered corn cob).
Odlagališta otpada na otvorenome
According to the opinion, the minimum requirement in agreed Union guidance of having three different alternatives with a different mode of action is not reached for any of the specified uses listed in Table 1.
Kanalizacija
Therefore, in the absence of anticoagulant rodenticides, the condition in Article 23(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 that the chemical diversity of the active substances is adequate to minimize the occurrence of resistance in the target harmful organisms is not met.
Pitanje (a): Je li kemijska raznolikost aktivnih tvari u odobrenim rodenticidima u Uniji dostatna da se pojava otpornosti u ciljnom štetnom organizmu svede na najnižu mjeru?
Question (b): For the different uses specified in the applications for renewal, are alternative authorised biocidal products or non-chemical means of control and prevention methods available?
U biocidnim proizvodima za vrstu proizvoda 14 postoji pet odobrenih aktivnih tvari s načinom djelovanja koji se razlikuje od načina djelovanja antikoagulantnih rodenticida (alfa kloraloza, aluminijev fosfid koji oslobađa fosfin, ugljikov dioksid, vodikov cijanid i klipovi kukuruza u prahu).
Tables 2 and 3 provide an overview of the alternatives considered in the opinion in order to address this question.
Prema mišljenju, najniži zahtjev u dogovorenim smjernicama Unije kojim se traži da postoje tri alternative s različitim načinima djelovanja nije ispunjen ni u jednoj navedenoj uporabi iz tablice 1.
Table 2
Stoga, u nedostatku antikoagulantnih rodenticida uvjet iz članka 23. stavka 3. točke (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 da kemijska raznolikost aktivnih tvari mora biti dostatna da pojavu otpornosti u ciljnim štetnim organizmima svede na najnižu mjeru nije ispunjen.
Overview of the alternative authorised biocidal products to the specified uses of anticoagulant rodenticides
Pitanje (b): Jesu li dostupni alternativni biocidni proizvodi ili nekemijske metode nadzora i prevencije za različite uporabe navedene u zahtjevima za obnovu odobrenja?
Use number as described in Table 1
U tablicama 2. i 3. nalazi se pregled alternativa razmotrenih u mišljenju u cilju rješavanja tog pitanja.
Active substance in the alternative biocidal products
Tablica 2.
Application type
Pregled odobrenih alternativnih biocidnih proizvoda za navedene uporabe antikoagulantnih rodenticida
Alpha chloralose
Broj načina uporabe kako je opisan u tablici 1.
Bait
Aktivna tvar u alternativnim biocidnim proizvodima
Only mice
Vrsta nanošenja
Aluminium phosphide releasing phosphine
Alfa-kloraloza
Only for R. norvegicus
Samo miševi
Carbon dioxide
Aluminijev fosfid koji oslobađa fosfin
Cannister for trapping device
Samo za R. norvegicus
The alternative authorised biocidal products do not cover all the uses specified for anticoagulant rodenticides (see Table 2).
Ugljikov dioksid
For some uses (uses number #2, #3, #5, #6 and #10), no alternative authorised biocidal products are available.
Spremnik za klopku
For use #7, there are alternative authorised biocidal products only for mice, and for uses #8 and #9 there are alternative authorised biocidal products only for rats (R. norvegicus).
Odobreni alternativni biocidni proizvodi ne obuhvaćaju sve uporabe navedene za antikoagulantne rodenticide (vidjeti tablicu 2.).
Table 3
Za neke uporabe (broj #2, #3, #5, #6 i #10) nema dostupnih odobrenih alternativnih biocidnih proizvoda.
Overview of the identified non-chemical alternatives to the specified uses of anticoagulant rodenticides
Za uporabu #7 odobreni alternativni biocidni proizvodi postoje samo za miševe, a za uporabe #8 i #9 odobreni alternativni biocidni proizvodi postoje samo za štakore (R. norvegicus).
Reported non-chemical alternative
Tablica 3.
Mode of action
Pregled odobrenih alternativnih nekemijskih alternativa za navedene uporabe antikoagulantnih rodenticida
Uses potentially covered
Prijavljena nekemijska alternativa
Curative treatments
Način djelovanja
Electrical rodent traps
Potencijalno obuhvaćene uporabe
Traps with electrical current killing the rodent entering the trap.
Sanacijski postupci
Glue boards
Električne klopke za glodavce
Rodents are captured in glue, killing has to be done separately.
Klopke pod strujnim naponom koje ubijaju glodavca pri ulasku u njih.
Mechanical traps (spring traps or break-back traps)
Ploče s ljepilom
Traps with mechanical weight are killing the entering rodent.
Glodavci se hvataju na ljepilo, a ubiti ih treba odvojeno.
Shooting
Mehaničke klopke (mišolovke na oprugu ili klasične mišolovke)
Shooting the rodents.
Klopke s mehaničkim utegom ubijaju glodavca pri ulasku u njih.
Preventive treatments
Ubijanje vatrenim oružjem
Habitat modification
Glodavci se ubijaju vatrenim oružjem.
Preventing rodent populations from establishing by limiting the supply of food/water/harbourage
Preventivni postupci
Rodent proofing
Promjene u staništu
Preventing access of rodents to buildings by blocking entering routes.
Nastanjivanje populacije glodavaca onemogućuje se ograničavanjem dostupnosti hrane/vode/skloništa
Ultra-sound
Zaštita od glodavaca
Repelling rodents with an ultrasonic output at 70-140 dB.
Pristup glodavaca zgradama onemogućuje se blokiranjem ulaznih putova.