natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See the report of the Inspectorate-General of Finance (Inspection générale des finances) (No 2007-M-031-01) and of the General Council of Bridges and Highways (Conseil général des ponts et chaussées) (No 005126-01) on the modernisation of the autonomous ports, July 2008, page 53 (‘The current fees for equipment come within the scope of taxable profit-generating activities but they are set to disappear in the medium term, as resources of the ports, with the proposed reform.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 248, 24.9.2015. str.
Under these conditions, the State fees constitute, in the medium term, the main and lasting source of taxable activity’) (http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/084000035.pdf).
9.).
See BOI-TVA-BASE-10-20-40-10 §§230 to 270 (http://bofip.impots.gouv.fr/bofip/1474-PGP.html).
Vidjeti odluku Komisije od 29. lipnja 2011. o državnoj potpori SA.27106 (C 13/09 – ex N 614/08) koju Francuska namjerava provesti u korist lučkog sektora (SL L 221, 27.8.2011., str. 8.).
Also see the reply to written question No 17487 by Mr Jean Arthuis, published in JO Sénat, 10 March 2011, p. 573; http://www.senat.fr/questions/base/2011/qSEQ110317487.html
Gospodarske komore čije se sjedište nalazi u pomorskom gradu i gospodarske komore koje su, bez obzira na svoj zemljopisni položaj, koncesionari javne opreme u određenoj morskoj luci.
See points 5 and 7 of the analytical grid for port infrastructure (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/modernisation/grid_ports_en.pdf).
Usp.
See Commission Decision of 11 March 2014 in State aid case SA.35720 (2014/NN) — United Kingdom — Liverpool City Council Cruise Liner Terminal, recitals 64-69 (OJ C 120, 23.4.2014, p. 4).
Francuska porezna dokumentacija BOI-IS.CHAMP-30-60, stavak 230. i nar.
As a percentage of turnover, port charges and State fees represent, for example, 42 % and 34 % respectively (and together 55 % of the operating costs) for the GPM of Bordeaux (in 2013, see French Court of Auditors, special report published on 8 March 2016, pp. 60 and 64), and 62 % and 18 % respectively (and together 76 % of the operating costs) for the GPM of Le Havre (in 2013, see Court of Auditors, special report published on 30 March 2016, pp. 112 and 113).
Ispravak administrativne pogreške.
See point 207 of the Notice of 19 July 2016.
Odluka Komisije od 20. listopada 2004. o državnoj potpori N 520/2003 – Belgija – Financijska potpora za radove na infrastrukturi flamanskih luka, uvodna izjava 35.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 May 2000, France v Ladbroke Racing and Commission, C-83/98 [P] (***), EU:C:2000:248, paragraphs 48 to 51.
(SL C 176, 16.7.2005., str. 11.).
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 November 2001, Adria-Wien Pipeline, C-143/99, EU:C:2001:598, paragraph 38.
SL C 262, 19.7.2016., str. 1.
And their successors (notably the GPMs) considered exempt from corporate tax by the tax administration on the same basis.
[10] Službeni list, 21.4.2012., str. 7198.
See point 206 of the Notice of 19 July 2016 and, with regard to SGEIs, judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003, Altmark Trans, C-280/00, EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87 to 95.
Odluka Komisije od 11. travnja 2016. o državnoj potpori SA.43975 (2016/NN) – Portugal – Potpora za ulaganje u luku u Funchalu, SL C 183, 11.5.2016., str. 1.).
Historically, the tax exemption granted in 1942 aimed to speed up the reconstruction of the ports destroyed by acts of war, and not to provide some kind of compensation for public service tasks.
Uredba Komisije (EU) br.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 December 2005, Italy v Commission, C-66/02, EU:C:2005:768, paragraph 94.
651/2014 оd 17. lipnja 2014. o ocjenjivanju određenih kategorija potpora spojivima s unutarnjim tržištem u primjeni članaka 107. i 108.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 September 2011, Paint Graphos and Others, Joined Cases C-78/08 to C-80/08, EU:C:2011:550, paragraph 49; judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 September 2006, Portugal v Commission, C-88/03, EU:C:2006:511, paragraph 56.
Ugovora (SL L 187, 26.6.2014., str.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 September 2011, Paint Graphos and Others, Joined Cases C-78/08 to C-80/08, EU:C:2011:550, paragraph 65; judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 September 2006, Portugal v Commission, C-88/03, EU:C:2006:511, paragraph 81.
1.).
See Bulletin officiel des finances publiques-Impôts — BOI-IS-CHAMP-30-60, II (paragraph 240): ‘successive ministerial decisions have exempted the ports from direct taxes’.
COM(2013) 296 final – 2013/0157 (COD), SL C 327, 12.11.2013., str. 111.
Council of State, 2 July 2014, Minister for the Budget, No 374807, FR:CESSR:2014:374807.20140702.
Taj je akt u međuvremenu donesen: Uredba (EU) 2017/352 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 15. veljače 2017. o uspostavi okvira za pružanje lučkih usluga i zajedničkih pravila o financijskoj transparentnosti luka (SL L 57, 3.3.2017., str. 1.).
Certain ports are operated by legal persons not covered by the decisions of 1942 and 1943, for example the commercial and fishing port of Sète (operated by a regional public institution — see judgment of the Administrative Court of Appeal of Marseilles of 19 January 2016, No 13MA03445), the port of Lorient (managed by a mixed-ownership company, see parliamentary question No 23815 published Journal officiel de la République française, 9 April 2013, p. 3694) or the marina of Saint-Cyprien (operated by the public institution of the port of Saint-Cyprien, a municipal authority with legal personality — see judgment of the Administrative Court of Appeal of Marseilles of 27 November 2012, No 12MA01312).
Presuda Suda od 12. rujna 2000., Pavlov i dr., spojeni predmeti C-180/98 do C-184/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, točka 74.
Reply to parliamentary question No 18664, published Journal officiel de la République française, 3 March 2009, p. 2040.
Vidjeti presudu Suda od 16. lipnja 1987., Komisija protiv Italije, C-118/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, točka 7 i presudu od 18. lipnja 1998., Komisija protiv Italije, C-35/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, točka 36.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 September 2011, Paint Graphos and Others, Joined Cases C-78/08 to C-80/08, EU:C:2011:550, paragraph 69.
Presuda Općeg suda od 12. prosinca 2000., Aéroports de Paris protiv Komisije, T-128/98, ECLI:EU:[T] (***):2000:290, točka 125., potvrđena u žalbenom postupku u presudi Suda od 24. listopada 2002., Aéroports de Pariz protiv Komisije, C-82/01 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:617.
Decision No 2012-238 QPC, 20 April 2012, Journal officiel de la République française, 21 April 2012, p. 7198.
Vidjeti i presudu Općeg suda od 17. prosinca 2008., Ryanair protiv Komisije, T-196/04, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585, točku 88.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 January 2015, Eventech, Case C-518/13, EU:C:2015:9, paragraphs 65 to 69.
Presuda Općeg suda od 24. ožujka 2011., Freistaat Sachsen i Land Sachsen-Anhalt i dr. protiv Komisije, spojeni predmeti T-443/08 i T-455/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:117, posebno točke 93. i 94., potvrđena u žalbenom postupku u presudi Suda od 19. prosinca 2012., Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG i Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH protiv Komisije, C-288/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:821, posebno točke 40. do 43. i točka 47.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 April 2009, Commission v Italy and Wam, Case C-494/06, EU:C:2009:272, paragraphs 53 and 54.
Vidjeti, na primjer, i odluku Komisije od 15. prosinca 2009. o državnoj potpori N 385/2009 – Javno financiranje lučke infrastrukture u luci u Ventspilsu (SL C 62, 13.3.2010., str. 7.). odluku Komisije od 15. lipnja 2011. o državnoj potpori N 44/2010 – Republika Latvija – Javno financiranje lučke infrastrukture u luci Krievu salā (SL C 215, 21.7.2011., str. 21.). odluku Komisije od 22. veljače 2012. o državnoj potpori SA.30742 (N/2010) – Litva – Izgradnja infrastrukture za putnički i teretni trajektni terminal u Klaipedi (SL C 121, 26.4.2012., str. 1.); odluku Komisije od 2. srpnja 2013. o državnoj potpori SA.35418 (2012/N) – Grčka – Proširenje luke u Pireju (SL C 256, 5.9.2013., str. 2.); odluku Komisije od 18. rujna 2013. o državnoj potpori SA.36953 (2013/N) – Španjolska – Lučka kapetanija Bahía de Cádiz (SL C 335, 16.11.2013., str. 1.).
In particular the French ports not benefiting from the corporate tax exemption.
Vidjeti, na primjer, odluku Komisije od 18. rujna 2013. o državnoj potpori SA.36953 (2013/N) – Španjolska – Lučka kapetanija Bahía de Cádiz (SL C 335, 16.11.2013., str. 1.).
See footnote 51 to the present Decision.
Presuda Suda od 10. prosinca 1991., Merci Convenzionali Porto di Genova, C-179/90, ECLI:EU:C:1991:464, točke 3. i 27.; Presuda Suda od 17. srpnja 1997. u predmetu C-242/95 GT-Link A/S protiv Danske Statsbaner, ECLI:EU:C:1997:376, točka 52. „Iz toga ipak ne proizlazi da upravljanje bilo kojom trgovačkom lukom pripada u upravljanje uslugom od općeg gospodarskog interesa niti da su sve pružene usluge u takvoj luci dio takve zadaće.”
See point 2.1 of the proposal for a Regulation on port services.
Vidjeti, na primjer, odluku Komisije od 18. prosinca 2013. o državnoj potpori SA.37402 – Slobodna luka Budimpešta (SL C 141, 9.5.2014., str. 1.); odluku Komisije od 17. listopada 2012. o državnoj potpori SA.34501 – Unutarnja luka Königs Wusterhausen/Wildau (SL C 176, 21.6.2013., str. 1.); odluku Komisije od 1. listopada 2014. o državnoj potpori SA.38478 – Luka Györ-Gönyü (SLC 418, 21.11.2014., str. 1.).
Also see ‘Communication from the Commission on a European Ports Policy’, COM/2007/0616 final, point II.4.2.
Odluka Komisije od 16. listopada 2002. o državnoj potpori N 438/02 – Belgija – Potpora za funkcije javnih tijela u sektoru luka (SL C 284, 21.11.2002., str. 2.).
See ‘Communication from the Commission on a European Ports Policy’, COM/2007/0616 final, point II.1.
Presuda Suda od 18. ožujka 1997., Calì & Figli, C-343/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:160, točka 22.
The price of transport services provided by the ports often represents a large share of the total transport cost.
Te se aktivnosti odnose na nekretnine i usluge potrebne za upravljanje lukama te su stoga oslobođene plaćanja poreza na dobit.
See Europe's Seaports 2030: challenges ahead, European Commission memo of 23 May 2013: ‘The costs and quality of port services are a major factor for European business.
U članku L. 5321-1 francuskog zakona o prometu navodi se da „lučku pristojbu mogu naplatiti državne luke, teritorijalne zajednice ili njihove grupacije za komercijalne aktivnosti ili zadržavanje plovila koje je pruženo u toj luci” te da ta pristojba „može sadržavati više elemenata” ili „naknada” (prema članku L.5321-3 istog zakona).
Port costs may account for a significant part of the total costs in the logistics chain.
U skladu s člankom L.4323-1 zakona te su odredbe primjenjive i na riječne luke.
Handling cargo, port dues and port nautical services can account for between 40 %-60 % of the total door-to-door logistic costs for business using short sea shipping to transport goods.’
U odluci br. 76-92 L od 6. listopada 1976. francusko Ustavno vijeće navelo je da se predmetnim odredbama „za boravak brodova u luci i povezane aktivnosti, uspostavljaju pristojbe čiji se iznos u potpunosti upotrebljava za pokrivanje lučkih troškova […], a koji omogućuju upotrebu javnog dobra i usluga koje su im tom prilikom pružene (te da su te pristojbe) zapravo naknade za pruženu uslugu”.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 December 1969, Commission v France, Joined Cases 6/69 and 11/69, EU:C:1969:68, paragraph 21; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 May 1999, Italy v Commission, C-6/97, EU:C:1999:251, paragraph 21.
[25] U skladu s člankom L. 5312-2 zakona o prometu GPM je posebno zadužen za „upravljanje područjem čiji je vlasnik ili koje mu je dodijeljeno te za razvoj tog područja”.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 July 1974, Italy v Commission, 173/73, EU:C:1974:71, paragraph 36.
Vidjeti i članak L. 5313-2 za nezavisne luke i članak L. 4322-1 za Nezavisnu luku Pariz.
Ports with traffic below the level defined in Article 20(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 1) (0,1 % of the total annual cargo volume handled in all maritime ports of the Union).
[26] Usp.
The CCI states that making it subject to corporate tax would jeopardise the ports it manages in view of their geographical location on the border with Spain and the proximity of the Spanish ports.
Revizorski sud, Rezultati reforme velikih morskih luka, Javno godišnje izvješće za 2017.
Also see the Decisions of the European Commission of 29 April 2015 in cases SA.37432 Czech Republic — Public hospitals in the Hradec Králové Region (OJ C 203, 19.6.2015, p. 1), SA.37904 Germany — Medical centre in Durmersheim (OJ C 188, 26.6.2015, p. 1), and SA.33149 Germany — Städtische Projektgesellschaft ‘Wirtschaftsbüro Gaarden — Kiel’ ( OJ C 188, 5.6.2015, p. 1).
veljača 2017.
The activity of the beneficiary port must have a purely local dimension, for example where the port supplies goods or services within a limited area of the country and is unlikely to attract customers from other Member States.
Francuska dokumentacija: „Očuvanje djelatnosti održavanja u nekim lukama”.
The measure must also have no foreseeable effect — or only marginal effects — on transnational investments in the sector concerned or on the location of undertakings within the single market.
Osim uvjeta povezanog s nepostojanjem „snažnog narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja” u članku 4. stavku 5. navodi se: „…u svakom slučaju, subjekti javnog prava smatraju se poreznim obveznicima u pogledu aktivnosti navedenih u Prilogu I. pod uvjetom da opseg tih aktivnosti nije tako malenog opsega da je zanemariv”.
See ‘Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest’ — 2012/C 8/02 ( OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 4).
Lučke usluge navedene su u Prilogu 1.
Also see Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3).
Prije razmatranja primjenjuje li se oslobođenje od plaćanja poreza predviđeno člankom 4. stavkom 5. (točka 37.)
See opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-74/16, Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe, EU:C:2017:135, paragraph 75.
Sud u predmetu C-276/97 jasno ocjenjuje predmetnu djelatnost (stavljanje cestovne infrastrukture na raspolaganje korisnicima u zamjenu za naknadu) gospodarskom djelatnošću (točka 32.).
Article L. 5312-2 of the Transport Code, which refers to a list of tasks imposed on the ports, concerns only the major seaports.
Presuda Suda od 10. siječnja 2006., Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA i dr., C-222/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:8, točke 122. i 123.
It does not define the parameters for the calculation of compensation or the safeguard measures to avoid overcompensation.
Nezavisna luka Pariz platila je i osam milijuna EUR za poreznu godinu 2014. te 11 milijuna EUR za poreznu godinu 2016.
EUR 1,196 million to be paid in 2016 by the major seaport of Guadeloupe (see order of 18 February 2016, published in Journal officiel de la République française, No 0048, 26 February 2016).
GPM Dunkerque platio je pet milijuna EUR za poreznu godinu 2014. i četiri milijuna EUR za poreznu godinu 2016.
On the other hand, other measures targeted at investment and fulfilling the criteria for compatibility (in particular the existence of a general interest and the appropriateness and proportionality of the measure) might, under certain conditions, be declared compatible with the internal market.
Uplaćene dividende mijenjaju se s vremenom ovisno o neto iznosu (između 14 % i 33 % za GPM Havre za razdoblje 2008. – 2013., između 22 % i 35 % za GPM Marseille za razdoblje 2009. – 2014.).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 March 1977, Steinike & Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany, 78/76, EU:C:1977:52, paragraph 24.
Vidjeti odluku Komisije od 22. veljače 2012. o državnoj potpori SA.30742 (N/2010) – Litva – luka u Klapeidi, uvodna izjava 9.
See the final Decision in State aid case SA.25338 (OJ L 113, 27.4.2016, p. 148).
(SL C 121, 26.4.2012., str. 1.).
Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1).
Usp. posebno članke R. 5321-2 i R. 5321-11.
[21] Commission Decision of 16 October 2002 in State aid case N 438/02 — Belgium — Subsidies to port authorities for carrying out public authority tasks (OJ C 284, 21.11.2002, p. 2).
BOI-TVA-BASE-10-20-40-10 §§230 do 270 (http://bofip.impots.gouv.fr/bofip/1474-PGP.html).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 March 1997, Calì & Figli, C-343/95, EU:C:1997:160, paragraph 22.
Vidjeti i odgovor na pisano pitanje br. 17487 g.
See orders of 18 February 2016 and 23 February 2017 setting the amount of the dividends payable to the State by the autonomous port of Paris and the major seaports (arrêtés des 18 février 2016 et 23 février 2017 fixant le montant des dividendes dus à l'État par le port autonome de Paris et les grands ports maritimes), Journal officiel de la République française No 0048, 26 February 2016, and No 53, 3 March 2017.
35720 (2014/NN) – Ujedinjena Kraljevina – Liverpool City Council Cruise Liner Terminal – uvodne izjave 64.
Pursuant to Article 205, Article 206(1) and Article 1654 of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts — ‘CGI’), legal persons governed by private or public law engaging in a business or transactions of a profit-making nature are subject to corporate tax.
(SL C 120, 23.4.2014., str. 4.).
This provision is now included in substance in Article 13 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1).
Vidjeti, primjerice, presudu Suda od 8. rujna 2011., Paint Graphos i dr., spojeni predmeti C-78/08 do C-80/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:550, točku 69.
Beyond a condition related to the absence of ‘significant distortions of competition’, Article 4(5) indicates that ‘in any event, bodies governed by public law shall be regarded as taxable persons in respect of the activities listed in Annex I, provided that those activities are not carried out on such a small scale as to be negligible’.
Odluka br. 2012-238 OPC od 20. travnja 2012., SLRF od 21.4.2012., str. 7198.
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) [1], and in particular Article 13(5) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2010/75/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 24. studenoga 2010. o industrijskim emisijama (integrirano sprečavanje i kontrola onečišćenja) [1], a posebno njezin članak 13. stavak 5.,
The forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, established by Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 [2], provided the Commission on 5 April 2017 with its opinion on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for the production of large volume organic chemicals.
Direktive 2010/75/EU te bi nadležna tijela trebala utvrditi granične vrijednosti emisija kojima se osigurava da, u normalnim radnim uvjetima, emisije ne prelaze razine emisija povezanih s najboljim raspoloživim tehnikama, kako je utvrđeno u zaključcima o NRT-ima.
That opinion is publicly available.
Forum sastavljen od predstavnika država članica, predmetnih industrija i nevladinih organizacija koje promiču zaštitu okoliša koji je Komisija osnovala Odlukom od 16. svibnja 2011.
The BAT conclusions set out in the Annex to this Decision are the key element of that BAT reference document.
[2] Komisiji je 5. travnja 2017. dostavio svoje mišljenje o predloženom sadržaju referentnog dokumenta o NRT-ima za proizvodnju baznih organskih kemikalija.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU,
To je mišljenje javno dostupno.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Zaključci o NRT-ima iz Priloga ovoj Odluci ključni su element tog referentnog dokumenta o NRT-ima.
Article 1
Mjere predviđene ovom Odlukom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog na temelju članka 75. stavka 1.
The best available techniques (BAT) conclusions for the production of large volume organic chemicals, as set out in the Annex, are adopted.
Direktive 2010/75/EU,
Done at Brussels, 21 November 2017.
Donose se zaključci o najboljim raspoloživim tehnikama (NRT-i) za proizvodnju baznih organskih kemikalija kako su utvrđeni u Prilogu.
OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 21. studenoga 2017.
Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of the Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (OJ C 146, 17.5.2011, p. 3).
Za Komisiju
BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES (BAT) CONCLUSIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF LARGE VOLUME ORGANIC CHEMICALS
SL L 334, 17.12.2010., str. 17.
SCOPE
Odluka Komisije od 16. svibnja 2011. kojom se osniva forum za razmjenu informacija u skladu s člankom 13.
These BAT conclusions concern the production of the following organic chemicals, as specified in Section 4.1 of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU:
Direktive 2010/75/EU o industrijskim emisijama (SL C 146, 17.5.2011., str. 3.).
simple hydrocarbons (linear or cyclic, saturated or unsaturated, aliphatic or aromatic);
PRILOG
oxygen-containing hydrocarbons such as alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters and mixtures of esters, acetates, ethers, peroxides and epoxy resins;
ZAKLJUČCI O NAJBOLJIM RASPOLOŽIVIM TEHNIKAMA (NRT-i) ZA PROIZVODNJU BAZNIH ORGANSKIH KEMIKALIJA
sulphurous hydrocarbons;
PODRUČJE PRIMJENE
nitrogenous hydrocarbons such as amines, amides, nitrous compounds, nitro compounds or nitrate compounds, nitriles, cyanates, isocyanates;
Ovi zaključci o NRT-ima odnose se na proizvodnju sljedećih organskih kemikalija, kako je navedeno u odjeljku 4.1.
phosphorus-containing hydrocarbons;
Priloga I. Direktivi 2010/75/EU:
halogenic hydrocarbons;
jednostavnih ugljikovodika (linearni ili ciklički, zasićeni ili nezasićeni, alifatski ili aromatski);
organometallic compounds;
ugljikovodika koji sadržavaju kisik, kao što su alkoholi, aldehidi, ketoni, karboksilne kiseline, esteri i pripravci estera, acetati, eteri, peroksidi i epoksidne smole;
surface-active agents and surfactants.
ugljikovodika koji sadržavaju sumpor;
These BAT conclusions also cover the production of hydrogen peroxide as specified in Section 4.2(e) of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU.
ugljikovodika koji sadržavaju dušik, kao što su amini, amidi, dušični spojevi, nitro-spojevi ili spojevi nitrata, nitrili, cijanati, izocijanati;
These BAT conclusions cover combustion of fuels in process furnaces/heaters, where this is part of the abovementioned activities.
ugljikovodika koji sadržavaju fosfor;
These BAT conclusions cover production of the aforementioned chemicals in continuous processes where the total production capacity of those chemicals exceeds 20 kt/year.
halogenih ugljikovodika;
These BAT conclusions do not address the following:
organometalnih spojeva;
combustion of fuels other than in a process furnace/heater or a thermal/catalytic oxidiser; this may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Large Combustion Plants (LCP);
površinski aktivnih tvari i surfaktanata.
incineration of waste; this may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Waste Incineration (WI);
Ovi zaključci o NRT-ima obuhvaćaju i proizvodnju vodikova peroksida, kako je navedeno u odjeljku 4.2. točki (e) Priloga I. Direktivi 2010/75/EU.