natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, and in particular Article 20(p) and (t) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br.
Whereas:
1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 17. prosinca 2013. o uspostavljanju zajedničke organizacije tržišta poljoprivrednih proizvoda i stavljanju izvan snage uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br.
Point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 provides that, for the classification of pig carcasses, the lean-meat content has to be assessed by means of grading methods authorised by the Commission and only statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcass may be authorised.
922/72, (EEZ) br.
The authorisation of grading methods should be subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment.
234/79, (EZ) br.
That tolerance is defined in Article 23(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
1037/2001 i (EZ) br.
By Commission Decision 2009/11/EC, the use of seven methods for grading pig carcasses in Spain was authorised.
1234/2007, a posebno njezin članak 20. točke (p) i (t),
Spain has requested the Commission to authorise one new method for grading pig carcasses on its territory and has presented a detailed description of the dissection trial, indicating the principles on which this method is based, the results of its dissection trial and the equation used for assessing the percentage of lean meat in the protocol provided for in Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
budući da:
Examination of that request has revealed that the conditions for authorising this grading method are fulfilled.
U odjeljku B.IV. točki 1.
This grading method should therefore be authorised in Spain.
Priloga IV.
Decision 2009/11/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbi (EU) br.
Modifications of the apparatus or grading methods should not be allowed, unless they are explicitly authorised by Commission Implementing Decision.
1308/2013 predviđeno je da se pri klasiranju svinjskih trupova udio mišićnog tkiva ocjenjuje metodama razvrstavanja koje odobri Komisija te da se mogu odobriti samo metode ocjenjivanja koje su statistički dokazane i koje se temelje na fizičkom mjerenju jednog ili više anatomskih dijelova trupa svinje.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,
Da bi se metoda razvrstavanja mogla odobriti, ona mora biti takva da se njome ne premaši najveća dopuštena statistička pogreška pri ocjenjivanju.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
To je odstupanje definirano u članku 23. stavku 3.
Article 1
Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br.
Decision 2009/11/EC is amended as follows:
1249/2008.
Article 1 is replaced by the following:
Odlukom Komisije 2009/11/EZ u Španjolskoj je odobrena primjena sedam metoda razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova.
‘Article 1
Španjolska je od Komisije zatražila odobrenje nove metode razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova na njezinu državnom području i dostavila detaljan opis postupka disekcije, naznačujući načela na kojima se temelji ta metoda, rezultate postupka disekcije i jednadžbu upotrijebljenu za procjenu postotka mišićnog tkiva u protokolu predviđenom u članku 23. stavku 4.
The use of the following methods is authorised for grading pig carcasses pursuant to point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council in Spain:
Uredbe (EZ) br.
the “Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex;
1249/2008.
the “Fully automatic ultrasonic carcase grading (Autofom)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex;
Razmatranjem tog zahtjeva ustanovljeno je da su uvjeti za odobrenje te metode razvrstavanja ispunjeni.
the “Ultrafom 300” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 3 of the Annex;
Stoga je potrebno odobriti tu metodu razvrstavanja u Španjolskoj.
the “Automatic vision system (VCS2000)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 4 of the Annex;
Odluku 2009/11/EZ trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
the “Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex;
Izmjene uređaja ili metoda ocjenjivanja nisu dopuštene, osim ako su izričito odobrene Provedbenom odlukom Komisije.
the “AutoFOM III” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex;
Mjere predviđene ovom Odlukom u skladu su s mišljenjem Upravljačkog odbora za zajedničku organizaciju poljoprivrednih tržišta,
the “manual method (ZP)” with a ruler and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 7 of the Annex;
DONIJELA JE OVU ODLUKU:
the “CSB-Image-Meater” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 8 of the Annex.
Članak 1.
The manual method ZP with a ruler, referred to in point (g) of the first paragraph, shall only be authorised for abattoirs:
Odluka 2009/11/EZ mijenja se kako slijedi:
where the number of slaughters does not exceed 500 pigs per week on yearly average basis; and
1.
having a slaughter line with a capacity to process no more than 40 pigs per hour.
Članak 1. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
the Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
„Članak 1.
Article 2
Odobrava se uporaba sljedećih metoda razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova u skladu s odjeljkom B.IV. točkom 1.
This Implementing Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Priloga IV.
Done at Brussels, 16 January 2018.
Uredbi (EU) br.
For the Commission
1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u Španjolskoj:
Member of the Commission
uređaj ‚Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 1.
OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
Priloga;
671.
uređaj ‚Fully automatic ultrasonic carcase grading (Autofom)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisani u dijelu 2.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and the reporting of prices thereof (OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p.
Priloga;
3).
uređaj ‚Ultrafom 300’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 3.
Commission Decision 2009/11/EC of 19 December 2008 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Spain (OJ L 6, 10.1.2009, p.
Priloga;
79).
uređaj ‚Automatic vision system (VCS2000)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisani u dijelu 4.
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
Priloga;
671).’;
uređaj ‚Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 5.
ANNEX
Priloga;
In the Annex to Decision 2009/11/EC the following Part 8 is added:
uređaj ‚AutoFOM III’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 6.
‘Part 8
Priloga;
The CSB-Image-Meater consists in particular of a video camera, a PC equipped with an image-analysis card, a screen, a printer, a command mechanism, a rate mechanism and interfaces.
Priloga;
The 4 CSB-Image-Meater variables are all measured at the split line in the ham area (around gluteus medius muscle); the measured values are transformed into estimation of a lean meat percentage by a central unit.
uređaj ‚CSB-Image-Meater’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 8.
The lean meat content of a carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Priloga.
Ŷ = 68,39920953 – (0,39050694 × F) – (0,32611391 × V4F) + (0,07864716 × M) – (0,00762296 × V4M)
Upotreba ručne metode ZP s pomičnim mjerilom navedena u prvom stavku točki (g) odobrava se samo u klaonicama:
where:
u kojima se u prosjeku u godinu dana zakolje najviše 500 svinja tjedno i
Ŷ = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass.
koje imaju linije klanja kapaciteta za obradu najviše 40 svinja po satu.
F = fat thickness as thinnest layer above muscle gluteus medius (in millimetres).
2.
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the implementation and exploitation of European satellite navigation systems and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and in particular Article 12(3)(c) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br.
Whereas:
1285/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. prosinca 2013. o provedbi i uporabi europskih sustava za satelitsku navigaciju i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/413 provides in its Annex that the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre (GSMC) will be spilt into two locations and will be developed in stages in France and the United Kingdom.
876/2002 i Uredbe (EZ) br.
On 29 March 2017 the United Kingdom notified the European Council of its intention to withdraw from the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
683/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, a posebno njezin članak 12. stavak 3. točku (c),
For reasons relating to the security of the European Union and its Member States, and in particular taking into account the rules on the protection of classified information and the restrictions on the export of cryptographic equipment and PRS technology, the GSMC should be located on the territory of a Member State of the European Union.
budući da:
In the guidelines adopted on 29 April 2017 following the notification by the United Kingdom, the European Council stated that the matter of the future location of the seats of EU facilities located in the United Kingdom should be settled rapidly and that arrangements should be made to facilitate their transfer.
U Prilogu Provedbenoj odluci Komisije (EU) 2016/413 navodi se da je Galileov centar za nadzor sigurnosti (GSMC) smješten na dvjema lokacijama te je predviđeno da ga se postupno uspostavlja u Francuskoj i Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini.
It is thus important to make provision without delay for the transfer of the United Kingdom GSMC to the territory of another EU Member State.
Ujedinjena Kraljevina je 29. ožujka 2017. obavijestila Europsko vijeće o svojoj namjeri povlačenja iz Unije, u skladu s člankom 50.
Therefore, the Commission launched an open and transparent selection procedure under Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 to determine the new location of the GSMC up to now located in the United Kingdom.
Ugovora o Europskoj uniji.
The procedure took place in two stages: the Commission first sent the Member States a call for expression of interests, and then invited the candidate Member States to present their detailed proposals.
Međutim, GSMC bi se zbog razloga povezanih sa sigurnošću Unije i njezinih država članica trebao nalaziti na području države članice Unije, uzimajući posebice u obzir pravila o zaštiti klasificiranih informacija i ograničenja izvoza kriptografske opreme i tehnologije javno reguliranih usluga (PRS).
Following the evaluation procedure, Spain's proposal was deemed to meet the assessment criteria best, given the suitability of the technical solution proposed for the provision of facilities and of services essential to the functioning of the centre, the accurate identification and management of risks, in particular risks relating to security and timing constraints, Spain's acceptance of the terms of the establishment agreement to be concluded with the Commission and the additional privileges granted, the thoroughness and transparency of the description of the construction and operating costs, and the proposal's favourable financial terms for the EU budget.
Europsko vijeće je u smjernicama koje je slijedom obavijesti Ujedinjene Kraljevine donijelo 29. travnja 2017. navelo da pitanje budućeg sjedišta instalacija Unije smještenih u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini treba brzo riješiti i olakšati njihov premještaj.
It is therefore appropriate to select Spain's proposal.
Stoga je važno bez odlaganja pokrenuti postupak premještanja GSMC-a iz Ujedinjene Kraljevine na područje druge države članice Unije.
The centre should be set up in March 2018 with a limited number of facilities so as to be able to operate as a back-up centre for the main centre, located in France, as soon as possible, and should become fully operational by the end of March 2019.
Komisija je u skladu s tim, a prema članku 12.
It should also be the subject of an establishment agreement with Spain.
Uredbe (EU) br.
The Annex to Implementing Decision 2016/413/EC should be amended accordingly.
1285/2013, pokrenula postupak otvorenog i transparentnog odabira kako bi se odredila nova lokacija za GSMC, koji je dosad bio smješten u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini.
In addition, it is necessary to amend the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/413 to reflect the fact that work to set up the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre located in France was completed in 2017.
U tom postupku Komisija u prvoj fazi državama članicama upućuje zahtjev za iskaz interesa, a u drugoj države članice kandidatkinje poziva da predstave detaljne prijedloge.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in line with the opinion of the committee established pursuant to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013,
U pogledu odabranih kriterija provedene evaluacije najboljim se pokazao prijedlog Španjolske, s obzirom na relevantnost tehničkog rješenja predloženog za stavljanje instalacija na raspolaganje i pružanje usluga neophodnih za funkcioniranje centra, preciznost u utvrđivanju rizika i njihovu upravljanju, posebice rizika povezanih sa sigurnošću i s ograničenjima vremenskog rasporeda, španjolsko prihvaćanje uvjeta sporazuma o uspostavi koji se sklapa s Komisijom i dodjeljivanje dodatnih povlastica, kao i s obzirom na stupanj podrobnosti i transparentnosti opisa troškova izgradnje i funkcioniranja centra te na financijske prednosti koje prijedlog ima za proračun Unije.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Stoga bi trebalo odabrati prijedlog Španjolske.
Article 1
Centar bi se trebao uspostaviti do ožujka 2018. sa smanjenim obujmom instalacija kako bi što prije mogao poslužiti kao dopunski centar za glavni centar smješten u Francuskoj, a u potpunosti bi trebao postati funkcionalan u ožujku 2019.
In the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/413, in the row relating to the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre (GSMC), in the column ‘Location and measures taken to ensure smooth functioning’, the words ‘The Galileo security centre, spilt into two locations, will be developed in stages in France and the United Kingdom.
Za to je također potrebno sklopiti sporazum o uspostavi sa Španjolskom.
Work started in 2013 and should end in 2017.
Prilog Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2016/413 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
It was the subject of an agreement signed in 2013 with France and the United Kingdom.’ are replaced by the words ‘The Galileo security centre, spilt into two locations, will be developed in France and Spain.
Osim toga, tekst Priloga Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2016/413 trebalo bi izmijeniti kako bi se u obzir uzela uspješna uspostava Galileova centra za nadzor sigurnosti u Francuskoj 2017.
Work to set up the site in France ended in 2017 and was the subject of an agreement signed in 2013 with France.
Mjere predviđene ovom Odlukom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog na temelju članka 36. stavka 1.
Work to set up the site in Spain will start in March 2018 with a limited number of facilities and should be completed in March 2019.
Uredbe (EU) br.
It should be the subject of an agreement to be signed with Spain in 2018.’
1285/2013,
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Članak 1.
By letter dated 28 July 2009, the Commission forwarded the complaint to Ireland and asked for its position on the claims set out in the letter dated 21 July 2009.
Dopisom od 28. srpnja 2009.
By letter dated 26 August 2009, Ireland asked for an extension of the deadline to reply, which the Commission accepted by way of a letter dated 3 September 2009.
Komisija je tu pritužbu proslijedila Irskoj i zatražila njezino stajalište o tvrdnjama iznesenima u dopisu od 21. srpnja 2009.
On 15 October 2009, Ireland responded to the Commission's letter and their reply was registered with the Commission on the same day.
Dopisom od 26. kolovoza 2009.
Since the alleged aid had been implemented without prior notification to the Commission, the case was registered as a non-notified measure.
Irska je zatražila produljenje roka za dostavljanje odgovora, što je Komisija prihvatila dopisom od 3. rujna 2009.
The Commission carried out a preliminary investigation pursuant to Article 108(3) TFEU.
Irska je 15. listopada 2009. odgovorila na dopis Komisije, koja je istog dana evidentirala njezin odgovor.
By decision of 13 July 2011 (‘the 2011 Decision’), adopted at the end of the preliminary investigation stage, the Commission rejected most of Ryanair's complaints.
Budući da je navodna potpora uvedena bez prethodne obavijesti Komisiji, predmet je evidentiran kao neprijavljena mjera.
In particular, it found that the non-application of the ATT to transfer and transit passengers did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Komisija je provela prethodni istražni postupak u skladu s člankom 108. stavkom 3.
But the Commission also decided to initiate a formal investigation procedure concerning the differentiated tax rates applicable to flights to destinations located no more than 300 kilometres from Dublin Airport and all other flights.
UFEU-a.
By application lodged at the Registry of the General Court on 24 September 2011, Ryanair brought an action for a partial annulment of the 2011 Decision, in so far as it found that the non-application of the ATT to transfer and transit passengers did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Odlukom od 13. srpnja 2011. („Odluka iz 2011.”), donesenom na kraju faze prethodnog istražnog postupka, Komisija je odbila većinu pritužbi društva Ryanair.
The case was registered as Case T-512/11.
Točnije, utvrdila je da neprimjenjivanje PZP-a na putnike u transferu i tranzitu ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
On 25 July 2012, the Commission adopted its decision (‘the 2012 Decision’) on the application of differentiated ATT rates.
UFEU-a.
It found that Ireland had granted State aid in the form of a lower ATT rate applicable to flights to destinations no more than 300 kilometres from Dublin Airport between 30 March 2009 and 28 February 2011.
No Komisija je odlučila pokrenuti i službeni istražni postupak u pogledu različitih poreznih tarifa koje se primjenjuju na letove do odredišta koja se nalaze najviše 300 kilometara od zračne luke Dublin i na sve ostale letove.
Moreover, the Commission found that State aid to be unlawful and incompatible with the internal market, and required Ireland to recover the incompatible aid from the beneficiaries.
Zahtjevom podnesenim tajništvu Općeg suda 24. rujna 2011.
By applications lodged on 1 November 2012 and 15 November 2012, Ryanair and Aer Lingus appealed the 2012 Decision.
Ryanair je podnio tužbu za djelomično poništenje Odluke iz 2011. u dijelu u kojem je utvrđeno da neprimjenjivanje PZP-a na putnike u transferu i tranzitu ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
Those cases were registered as Case T-473/12 and Case T-500/12.
UFEU-a.
By judgment of 25 November 2014, the General Court annulled the 2011 Decision in so far as the 2011 Decision found that the non-application of the ATT to transfer and transit passengers did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Predmet je evidentiran pod brojem T-512/11.
The General Court held that the Commission should have initiated the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU.
Komisija je 25. srpnja 2012. donijela odluku („Odluka iz 2012.”) o primjeni različitih tarifa PZP-a.
By judgment of 5 February 2015, the General Court annulled the 2012 Decision concerning the differentiated tax rates applicable to flights to destinations located no more than 300 kilometres from Dublin Airport, in so far as the 2012 Decision ordered the recovery of aid from the beneficiaries for an amount which is set at EUR 8 per passenger.
Utvrdila je da je Irska od 30. ožujka 2009. do 28. veljače 2011. državnu potporu dodjeljivala u obliku niže tarife PZP-a koja se primjenjivala na letove do odredišta koja se nalaze najviše 300 kilometara od zračne luke Dublin.
The Commission lodged an appeal before the Court of Justice against that judgment.
Nadalje, Komisija je utvrdila da je državna potpora nezakonita i nespojiva s unutarnjim tržištem te je od Irske zatražila da od korisnika vrati nespojivu potporu.
Following the annulment of the 2011 Decision, by letter dated 28 September 2015, the Commission informed Ireland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of the non-application of the ATT to transfer and transit passengers.
Ryanair i Aer Lingus žalbe na Odluku iz 2012. podnijeli su 1. studenoga 2012. i 15. studenoga 2012.
This decision (‘Opening Decision’) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ti su predmeti evidentirani pod brojevima T-473/12 i T-500/12.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Presudom od 25. studenoga 2014.
Ireland submitted its comments on the Opening Decision by letter dated 22 December 2015, registered with the Commission on 6 January 2016.
Opći sud poništio je Odluku iz 2011. u dijelu u kojem je u njoj utvrđeno da neprimjenjivanje PZP-a na putnike u transferu i tranzitu ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The Commission received comments from two interested parties.
UFEU-a.
By letter dated 23 August 2016, the Commission forwarded those to Ireland, which was given the opportunity to react.
Opći sud smatrao je da je Komisija trebala pokrenuti službeni istražni postupak utvrđen u članku 108. stavku 2.
In the absence of a response from Ireland, the Commission reiterated its invitation to Ireland to provide its observations on the comments received from interested parties by way of a letter dated 17 October 2016.
UFEU-a.
By letter dated 9 December 2016, the Commission asked Ireland to provide additional information.
Presudom od 5. veljače 2015.
Ireland replied by letter dated 18 January 2017.
Opći sud poništio je Odluku iz 2012. o različitim poreznim tarifama koje se primjenjuju na letove do odredišta koja se nalaze najviše 300 kilometara od zračne luke Dublin, u dijelu u kojem se njome nalaže povrat potpore od korisnika u iznosu određenom u visini od 8 EUR po putniku.
In that letter, Ireland also submitted its observations on the comments received from interested parties.
Komisija je Sudu podnijela žalbu protiv te presude.
By judgment of 21 December 2016, the Court of Justice set aside the judgments of the General Court in so far as those judgments had annulled the 2012 Decision.
Nakon poništenja Odluke iz 2011.
The Court of Justice thus confirmed that Ireland must recover the sum of EUR 8 per passenger from airlines benefiting from unlawful State aid.
Komisija je dopisom od 28. rujna 2015. obavijestila Irsku da je u pogledu neprimjenjivanja PZP-a na putnike u transferu i tranzitu odlučila pokrenuti postupak utvrđen u članku 108. stavku 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE AND THE PREVIOUS PROCEDURES
UFEU-a.
ATT
Odluka („Odluka o pokretanju postupka”) objavljena je u Službenom listu Europske unije.