natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558).
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2446 od 28. srpnja 2015. o dopuni Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 9. listopada 2013. o detaljnim pravilima koja se odnose na pojedine odredbe Carinskog zakonika Unije (SL L 343, 29.12.2015., str. 1.).
ANNEX
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 оd 24. studenoga 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za provedbu određenih odredbi Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju Carinskog zakonika Unije (SL L 343, 29.12.2015., str. 558.).
CN code
Redni br.
TARIC code
Oznaka KN
Description of goods
Oznaka TARIC
Periods
Opis robe
Annual quantity (in tonnes net weight)
Razdoblja
Prepared or preserved fillets of tuna (Thunnus albacares)
Godišnja količina (izražena u tonama neto težine)
to the date determined in accordance with Article 2(1)(a) and (b)
Pripremljeni ili konzervirani fileti tune (Thunnus albacares)
The request was for an annual volume of 5000 tonnes of prepared or preserved tuna for a period of 2 years from 1 January 2017 until 31 December 2018.
do datuma utvrđenog u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkama (a) i (b)
Under the derogation requested these products would be considered as originating in Cape Verde even if, despite being produced in Cape Verde, they were produced from non-originating fish.
Zahtjevom je zatraženo odstupanje za godišnju količinu od 5000 tona pripremljene ili konzervirane tune na razdoblje od dvije godine, od 1. siječnja 2017. do 31. prosinca 2018.
granting Cape Verde a temporary derogation from the rules on preferential origin laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, in respect of prepared or preserved mackerel fillets and prepared or preserved frigate tuna or frigate mackerel fillets
o odobravanju Kabo Verdeu privremenog odstupanja od pravila o povlaštenom podrijetlu utvrđenih u Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2015/2446, u pogledu pripremljenih ili konzerviranih fileta skuše i pripremljenih ili konzerviranih fileta trupca ili trupa
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code [1], and in particular Articles 64(6) and 66(b) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 9. listopada 2013. o Carinskom zakoniku Unije [1], a posebno njezin članak 64. stavak 6. i članak 66. točku (b),
By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 439/2011 [3] Cape Verde was granted a derogation from Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 [4] in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the GSP.
Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 439/2011 [3] Kabo Verdeu je odobreno odstupanje od Uredbe Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93 [4] u vezi s određenjem pojma proizvoda s podrijetlom koji se koristi za potrebe OSP-a.
By virtue of its cumulation rules, this new agreement will allow the fish processing industry of Cape Verde to comply with the rules on preferential origin by using fish originating in the other West African States.
Ta je količina u određenoj mjeri pridonijela ponovnom oživljavanju flote malih ribarskih plovila Kabo Verdea, što je od ključne važnosti za tu zemlju.
From 2008, the total annual quantities that were granted to Cape Verde under the derogation have contributed, to a significant extent, to improving the situation in the Cape Verdean fishery processing sector.
Iz argumenata navedenih u zahtjevu može se zaključiti da bi bez odstupanja sposobnost riboprerađivačke industrije Kabo Verdea da nastavi s izvozom u Uniju na temelju OSP-a bila znatno narušena, čime bi se mogao omesti daljnji razvoj flote malih ribarskih plovila Kabo Verdea za pelagijski ribolov.
Those quantities have also led, to a certain extent, to the revitalisation of Cape Verde's fleet of small fishing vessels, which is of vital importance to the country.
Potrebno je dodatno vrijeme kako bi se učvrstili rezultati koje je Kabo Verde već postigao u svojim naporima da ponovno oživi lokalnu ribolovnu flotu.
The arguments in the request demonstrate that, without the derogation, the ability of the Cape Verdean fish processing industry to continue exporting to the Union under the GSP would be significantly affected, which might deter further development of the Cape Verdean fleet of small vessels for pelagic fishing.
Odstupanjem bi se Kabo Verdeu trebalo dati dovoljno vremena da se pripremi za usklađivanje s pravilima za stjecanje povlaštenog podrijetla.
Additional time is needed to consolidate the results already obtained by Cape Verde in its efforts to revitalise its local fishing fleet.
Uzimajući u obzir privremenu narav odobrenih odstupanja u vezi s određenjem pojma proizvoda s podrijetlom, odstupanje treba odobriti na razdoblje od dvije godine s početkom od 1. siječnja 2017., u pogledu godišnje količine od 2500 tona za pripremljene ili konzervirane filete skuše i 875 tona za pripremljene ili konzervirane filete trupca ili trupa.
The derogation should give Cape Verde sufficient time to prepare itself to comply with the rules for the acquisition of preferential origin.
Međutim, odstupanje bi trebalo isteći na dan koji neposredno prethodi datumu stupanja na snagu SGP-a sa Zapadnom Afrikom, ako se to dogodi prije 31. prosinca 2018.
Having regard to the temporary nature of derogations granted in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products, the derogation should be granted for a period of two years starting on 1 January 2017, in respect of yearly quantities of 2500 tonnes for prepared or preserved mackerel fillets and 875 tonnes for prepared or preserved frigate tuna or frigate mackerel fillets.
Količinama utvrđenima u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi upravlja se u skladu s člancima od 49. do 54.
The derogation should, however, end on the day immediately preceding the date of the entry into force of the EPA with West Africa, if it occurs before 31 December 2018.
Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 [5], kojima se uređuje upravljanje carinskim kvotama.
The quantities set out in the Annex to this Regulation shall be managed in accordance with Articles 49 to 54 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 [5] which govern the management of tariff quotas.
Odstupanje bi trebalo odobriti uz uvjet da carinska tijela Kabo Verdea poduzimaju potrebne korake za provedbu kvantitativnih provjera pri izvozu proizvoda na koje se primjenjuje odstupanje te da Komisiji prosljeđuju izjavu o količini na temelju koje su u skladu s ovom Uredbom izdane potvrde o podrijetlu obrazac „Form A”, te serijske brojeve tih potvrda.
The derogation should be granted on the condition that the customs authorities of Cape Verde take the necessary steps to carry out quantitative checks on exports of the products subject to derogation, and that they forward to the Commission a statement of the quantities in respect of which certificates of origin Form A have been issued pursuant to this Regulation and the serial numbers of those certificates.
Mjere predviđene u ovoj Uredbi trebaju stupiti na snagu što prije, dan nakon njezine objave, kako bi se uzelo u obzir stanje u Kabo Verdeu i kako bi se toj zemlji omogućilo da primijeni odstupanje bez daljnje odgode.
The measures provided for in this Regulation should enter into force as soon the day after its publication in order to take into account the situation of Cape Verde and to allow this country to use the derogation without any further delay.
Iz istog razloga ova bi se Uredba trebala primjenjivati retroaktivno od 1. siječnja 2017.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 439/2011 expired on 31 December 2016 and was based on Article 89 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down the implementing provisions of the Community Customs Code, which has been repealed on 1 May 2016.
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
It is appropriate prolonging the derogation through a new implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 64(6) of the Union Customs Code.
Članak 1.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,
U skladu s člancima 2., 3. i 4. ove Uredbe i odstupajući od članka 41. točke (b) i članka 45.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2446 [6], pripremljeni ili konzervirani fileti skuše i pripremljeni ili konzervirani fileti trupca ili trupa iz oznake KN 16041511 i ex16041997 proizvedeni u Kabo Verdeu od ribe koja nije podrijetlom iz Kabo Verdea smatraju se podrijetlom iz Kabo Verdea.
By way of derogation from Articles 41(b) and 45 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 [6], prepared or preserved mackerel fillets and prepared or preserved frigate tuna or frigate mackerel fillets of CN code 16041511 and ex16041997 produced in Cape Verde from non-originating fish shall be regarded as originating in Cape Verde in accordance with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of this Regulation.
Odstupanje se primjenjuje na proizvode koji se u razdoblju od 1. siječnja 2017. do sljedećih datuma izvezu iz Kabo Verdea i deklariraju za puštanje u slobodan promet u Uniji:
Article 2
31. prosinca 2018. ili
The derogation shall apply to products which have been both exported from Cape Verde and declared for release for free circulation in the Union during the period from 1 January 2017 until:
ako Sporazum o gospodarskom partnerstvu između Unije i zapadne Afrike, parafiran 30. ožujka 2014. („SGP”), stupi na snagu 31. prosinca 2018. ili ranije, do dana koji neposredno prethodi datumu stupanja na snagu SGP-a.
31 December 2018 or
Odstupanje se primjenjuje na proizvode do godišnje količine navedene u Prilogu.
if the Economic Partnership Agreement between the Union and West Africa initialled on 30 March 2014 (‘EPA’) enters into force on or before 31 December 2018, then the day immediately preceding the date of entry into force of the EPA.
Primjena odstupanja podliježe usklađivanju s uvjetima utvrđenima u članku 43.
The derogation shall apply to products up to the annual quantity listed in the Annex.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446.
Application of the derogation is subject to compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 43 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Članak 3.
Article 3
Količinama utvrđenima u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi upravlja se u skladu s člancima od 49. do 54.
The quantities set out in the Annex to this Regulation shall be managed in accordance with Articles 49 to 54 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 which govern the management of tariff quotas.
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447, kojima se uređuje upravljanje carinskim kvotama.
The customs authorities of Cape Verde shall take the necessary steps to carry out quantitative checks on exports of the products referred to in Article 1.
Carinska tijela Kabo Verdea poduzimaju potrebne korake za provedbu količinskih provjera izvoza proizvodâ iz članka 1.
OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1.
SL L 269, 10.10.2013., str. 1.
Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 (OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) br. 978/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 25. listopada 2012. o primjeni sustava općih carinskih povlastica i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 732/2008 (SL L 303, 31.10.2012., str. 1.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 439/2011 of 6 May 2011 on a derogation from Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences to take account of the special situation of Cape Verde regarding exports of certain fisheries products to the European Union (OJ L 119, 7.5.2011, p. 1).
Provedbena Uredba Komisije (EU) br. 439/2011 od 6. svibnja 2011. o odstupanju od Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2454/93 u vezi s određenjem pojma proizvoda s podrijetlom koji se koristi za potrebe sustava općih carinskih povlastica kako bi se u obzir uzela specifična situacija u Kabo Verdeu u pogledu izvoza određenih proizvoda ribarstva u Europsku uniju (SL L 119, 7.5.2011., str. 1.).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93 od 2. srpnja 1993. o utvrđivanju odredaba za provedbu Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2913/92 o Carinskom zakoniku Zajednice (SL L 253, 11.10.1993., str. 1.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 оd 24. studenoga 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za provedbu određenih odredbi Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju Carinskog zakonika Unije (SL L 343, 29.12.2015., str. 558.).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p.
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2446 od 28. srpnja 2015. o dopuni Uredbe (EU) br.
1).
952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o detaljnim pravilima koja se odnose na pojedine odredbe Carinskog zakonika Unije (SL L 343, 29.12.2015., str.
ANNEX
1.).
Prepared or preserved fillets of mackerel (Scomber scombrus, Scomber japonicus, Scomber colias)
Godišnja količina (izražena u tonama neto mase)
to the date determined in accordance with Article 2(1)(a) and (b)
Pripremljeni ili konzervirani fileti skuše (Scomber scombrus, Scomber japonicus, Scomber colias)
Prepared or preserved fillets of frigate tuna or frigate mackerel (Auxis thazard, Auxis rochei)
Od 1.1.2017. do datuma utvrđenoga u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkama (a) i (b)
By letter dated 27 September 2016, Cape Verde submitted a request for a prolongation of that derogation, for the same annual volumes, for a period of two years from 1 January 2017 until 31 December 2018, pending entry into force of the new Economic Partnership Agreement (‘EPA’) between the Union and West Africa initialled on 30 June 2014.
Pripremljeni ili konzervirani fileti trupca ili trupa (Auxis thazard, Auxis rochei)
imposing definitive countervailing duties on imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People's Republic of China and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/649 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvođenju konačnih kompenzacijskih pristojbi na uvoz određenih toplovaljanih plosnatih proizvoda od željeza, nelegiranog čelika ili drugoga legiranog čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i izmjeni Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2017/649 o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenih toplovaljanih plosnatih proizvoda od željeza, nelegiranog čelika ili drugoga legiranog čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’) [1], and in particular Article 15 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1037 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od subvencioniranog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije („Osnovna uredba”) [1], a posebno njezin članak 15.,
The initiation was based on Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2].
Pokretanje postupka temeljilo se na članku 10.
It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘Notice of Initiation’) [3].
Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 597/2009 od 11. lipnja 2009. o zaštiti od subvencioniranog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske zajednice [2].
The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 31 March 2016 by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of Union producers representing more than 90 % of the total Union production of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel (‘HRF’).
Obavijest o pokretanju postupka objavila je u Službenom listu Europske unije („Obavijest o pokretanju postupka”) [3].
The complaint contained evidence of subsidisation and of a resulting threat of injury that was sufficient to justify the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je pokrenula ispitni postupak na temelju pritužbe koju je 31. ožujka 2016. podnijela Europska federacija proizvođača željeza i čelika („Eurofer” ili „podnositelj pritužbe”) u ime proizvođača iz Unije koji čine više od 90 % ukupne proizvodnje određenih toplovaljanih plosnatih proizvoda od željeza, nelegiranog čelika ili drugog legiranog čelika u Uniji („toplovaljani plosnati proizvodi”).
Prior to the initiation of the anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission notified the Government of China (‘GOC’) [4] that it had received a properly documented complaint, and invited the GOC for consultations in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation.
Pritužba je sadržavala dokaz o subvencioniranju i posljedičnoj prijetnji štete, što je bilo dostatno da se opravda pokretanje ispitnog postupka.
During the consultations, due note was taken of the comments submitted by the GOC.
Osnovne uredbe.
A few months before the initiation of the present investigation, the Commission initiated, on 13 February 2016 [5], an anti-dumping investigation on imports of the same product originating in the PRC (‘the parallel anti-dumping investigation’).
Nekoliko mjeseci prije pokretanja ovog ispitnog postupka Komisija je 13. veljače 2016.
Shortly after the initiation of the present investigation, the Commission also initiated on 7 July 2016 [6], an anti-dumping investigation on imports of the same product originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine.
[5] pokrenula antidampinški ispitni postupak u vezi s uvozom istog proizvoda podrijetlom iz NRK-a („usporedni antidampinški ispitni postupak”).
On 5 April 2017 the Commission imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the same product originating in the PRC [7] (‘the anti-dumping Regulation’).
Ubrzo nakon pokretanja ovog ispitnog postupka Komisija je 7. srpnja 2016.
The injury, causation and Union interest analyses performed in the present anti-subsidy and the parallel anti-dumping investigation are similar, since the definition of the Union industry, the representative Union producers and the investigation period are the same in both investigations.
[6] pokrenula i antidampinški ispitni postupak u vezi s uvozom istog proizvoda podrijetlom iz Brazila, Irana, Rusije, Srbije i Ukrajine.
They have been up-dated and complemented in order to take account of all factual elements brought forward in the present investigation.
Komisija je 5. travnja 2017. uvela konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz istog proizvoda podrijetlom iz NRK-a [7] („Antidampinška uredba”).
Comments following initiation
Analize štete, uzročnosti i interesa Unije provedene u ovom antisubvencijskom i usporednom antidampinškom ispitnom postupku slične su jer su definicija industrije Unije, reprezentativni proizvođači iz Unije i razdoblje ispitnog postupka isti u oba ispitna postupka.
The GOC argued that the filing of an anti-dumping complaint against the same product from five countries on the basis of the existence of material injury within less than two months of the filing of the present complaint based on a threat of injury raises serious questions as to whether the present anti-subsidy investigation should have been initiated.
Ažurirane su i dopunjene kako bi se uzeli u obzir svi činjenični elementi izneseni u ovom ispitnom postupku.
The Commission noted that the anti-subsidy case against the PRC and the anti-dumping case against the same product from five other countries are two separate investigations that must be assessed on their own merits.
Primjedbe nakon pokretanja postupka
First, the two cases have different investigation periods, which only partially overlap (the second half of 2015).
Kineska vlada smatrala je da se podnošenjem antidampinške pritužbe protiv istog proizvoda iz pet zemalja na temelju postojanja materijalne štete manje od dva mjeseca nakon podnošenja ove pritužbe koja se temelji na prijetnji nanošenja štete postavljaju ozbiljna pitanja o tome je li bilo potrebno pokrenuti ovaj antisubvencijski ispitni postupak.
Second, the anti-subsidy complaint was based on a threat of injury to the Union industry whereas the subsequent anti-dumping complaint was based on the existence of injury to the Union industry.
Komisija je istaknula da su antisubvencijski predmet protiv NRK-a i antidampinški predmet u pogledu istog proizvoda iz pet drugih zemalja dva zasebna ispitna postupka koji se moraju ocijeniti prema vlastitim kriterijima.
In this respect, the Commission recalled that the determination of dumping and injury is made on the basis of an investigation period defined in line with the relevant legal provisions and announced in the Notice of Initiation for each of the two cases.
Kao prvo, ta dva predmeta imaju različita razdoblja ispitnog postupka, koja se samo djelomično preklapaju (druga polovina 2015.).
Moreover, without prejudice to the results of the ongoing anti-dumping investigation concerning the other five countries, recitals (549) to (551) show that the sufficient evidence available at the time of initiation has not been invalidated by the evidence found during the investigation.
Kao drugo, antisubvencijska pritužba temeljila se na prijetnji nanošenja štete industriji Unije dok se kasnija antidampinška pritužba temeljila na postojanju štete za industriju Unije.
The Commission thus rejected this claim as unfounded.
S obzirom na to, Komisija je podsjetila da se odluka o dampingu i šteti donosi na temelju razdoblja ispitnog postupka utvrđenog u skladu s odgovarajućim pravnim odredbama i najavljenog u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka za svaki od ta dva predmeta.
The GOC also claimed that the investigation should be terminated because the complaint did not satisfy the evidentiary requirements of Articles 11(2) and 11(3) of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and of Article 10(2) of the basic Regulation.
Nadalje, ne dovodeći u pitanje rezultate tekućeg antidampinškog ispitnog postupka koji se odnosi na drugih pet zemalja, uvodne izjave (549) do (551) pokazuju da dovoljni dokazi dostupni u vrijeme pokretanja postupka nisu poništeni dokazima pronađenima tijekom ispitnog postupka.
According to the GOC, there was insufficient evidence of countervailable subsidies, injury and a causal link between the subsidised imports and the injury.
Komisija je stoga odbacila ovu tvrdnju kao neosnovanu.
The evidence submitted in the complaint constituted the information reasonably available to the complainant.
Kineska vlada tvrdila je i da bi ispitni postupak trebalo završiti jer u pritužbi nisu ispunjeni zahtjevi o dokazima iz članka 11. stavaka 2. i 3.
It was also sufficient to show, at initiation stage, that the alleged subsidies were countervailable in terms of their existence, amount and nature.
Sporazuma WTO-a o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama te iz članka 10. stavka 2.
The complaint also contained sufficient evidence that there was a threat of injury to the Union industry, which was caused by the subsidised imports.
Osnovne uredbe.