natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the defendant seeks a decision annulling or altering the contested decision on a point not raised in the appeal, pursuant to Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, that cross appeal shall be filed within the time limit for filing a response in accordance with Article 24(1) of this Regulation.
Ako podnositelj zahtjeva za proglašenje ništavnosti ne dostavi dokaz ili razlog za neuporabu prije isteka roka ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi ili razlozi očito nedovoljni ili nerelevantni, Ured odbija zahtjev za proglašenje ništavnosti ako se on temelji na tom ranijem žigu.
A cross appeal shall be submitted by a document separate from the response.
Članak 10. stavci od 3. do 7. ove Uredbe primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis.
The cross appeal shall contain the name and address of the defendant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431 and shall comply mutatis mutandis with the conditions laid down in Article 21(1)(b) to (e) and Article 22 of this Regulation.
Članak 20.
A cross appeal shall be rejected as inadmissible in any of the following events:
Zahtjev za prijenos
where it has not been filed within the time-limit laid down in paragraph 1;
Ako nositelj žiga umjesto proglašavanja ništavim zatraži prijenos, u skladu s člankom 18. stavcima 1. i 2. točkom (a) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis odredbe iz članaka od 12. do 19. ove Uredbe.
where it has not been filed in observance of the requirements laid down either in paragraph 2 or Article 21(1)(d);
Ako je Ured ili sud za žig EU-a djelomično ili u cijelosti odobrio zahtjev za prijenos u skladu s člankom 18. stavkom 2.
where it does not comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 3, and the defendant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied these deficiencies within the time-limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect or has not submitted the translation of the cross appeal and the corresponding statement of grounds within one month of the date of submission of the original.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 i odluka ili presuda postane pravomoćna, Ured osigurava da se konačni djelomični ili potpuni prijenos žiga EU-a upisuje u registar i objavljuje.
The appellant shall be invited to submit observations on the defendant's cross appeal within two months of the date of notification to the appellant.
GLAVA V.
In exceptional circumstances, that time-limit may be extended by the Board of Appeal upon the reasoned request of the appellant.
ŽALBE
Article 26 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Članak 21.
Article 26
Obavijest o žalbi
Reply and rejoinder in inter partes proceedings
Obavijest o žalbi podnesena u skladu s člankom 60. stavkom 1.
Upon the appellant's reasoned request filed within two weeks following the notification of the response, the Board of Appeal may, pursuant to Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, authorise the appellant to supplement the statement of grounds by a reply within a period specified by the Board of Appeal.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 sadržava sljedeće:
In such a case, the Board of Appeal shall also authorise the defendant to supplement the response by a rejoinder within a period specified by the Board of Appeal.
ime i adresu podnositelja žalbe u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
Article 27
ako je podnositelj žalbe ovlastio zastupnika, ime i službenu adresu zastupnika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (e) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
Examination of the appeal
ako je zastupanje podnositelja žalbe obavezno u skladu s člankom 92. stavkom 2.
In ex parte proceedings, and with respect to those goods or services which form part of the subject matter of the appeal, the Board of Appeal, in compliance with Article 40(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, shall proceed in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 where it raises a ground for refusal of the trade mark application which had not already been invoked in the decision subject to appeal in application of that provision.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, ime i poslovnu adresu zastupnika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (e) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
In inter partes proceedings, the examination of the appeal and, as the case may be, the cross appeal, shall be restricted to the grounds invoked in the statement of grounds and, as the case may be, in the cross appeal.
jasno i nedvosmisleno navedenu odluku protiv koje se podnosi žalba s datumom kada je donesena i brojem spisa u postupku na koji se odnosi odluka protiv koje se podnosi žalba;
Matters of law not raised by the parties shall be examined by the Board of Appeal only where they concern essential procedural requirements or where it is necessary to resolve them in order to ensure a correct application of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 having regard to the facts, evidence and arguments presented by the parties.
ako se odluka protiv koje se podnosi žalba osporava samo djelomično, jasne i nedvosmislene podatke o proizvodima ili uslugama u odnosu na koje se ona osporava.
The examination of the appeal shall include the following claims or requests provided that they have been raised in the statement of grounds of the appeal or, as the case may be, in the cross appeal and provided that they were raised in due time in the proceedings before the instance of the Office which adopted the decision subject to appeal:
Ako je obavijest o žalbi podnesena na drugom službenom jeziku Unije koji nije jezik postupka, podnositelj žalbe dostavlja njezin prijevod u roku od četiri mjeseca od datuma obavijesti o odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba.
distinctiveness acquired through use as referred to in Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
Ako je u postupku ex parte odluka protiv koje se podnosi žalba donesena na službenom jeziku koji nije jezik postupka, podnositelj žalbe može podnijeti obavijest o žalbi na jeziku postupka ili na jeziku na kojem je donesena odluka protiv koje se podnosi žalba.
recognition of the earlier trade mark on the market acquired through use for the purposes of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
U svakom slučaju, jezik koji se upotrebljava za obavijest o žalbi postaje jezik žalbenog postupka i ne primjenjuje se stavak 2.
proof of use pursuant to Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 or Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Čim je u postupku inter partes podnesena obavijest o žalbi, o njoj se obavješćuje branjenik.
In accordance with Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Board of Appeal may accept facts or evidence submitted for the first time before it only where those facts or evidence meet the following requirements:
Članak 22.
they are, on the face of it, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case; and
Obrazloženje žalbe
they have not been produced in due time for valid reasons, in particular where they are merely supplementing relevant facts and evidence which had already been submitted in due time, or are filed to contest findings made or examined by the first instance of its own motion in the decision subject to appeal.
U obrazloženju žalbe podnesenom u skladu s člankom 60. stavkom 1. četvrtom rečenicom Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 jasno i nedvosmisleno se navodi sljedeće:
The Board of Appeal shall, at the latest in its decision on the appeal and, as the case may be, the cross appeal, decide on requests for restriction, division or partial surrender of the contested mark declared during the appeal proceedings by the applicant or the proprietor in accordance with Articles 43, 44 or 50 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
žalbeni postupak na koji se odnosi s naznakom odgovarajućeg broja žalbe ili odluke protiv koje se podnosi žalba u skladu sa zahtjevima propisanima u članku 21. stavku 1. točki (d) ove Uredbe;
Where the Board of Appeal accepts the restriction, division or partial surrender, it shall without delay inform the department in charge of the register and the departments dealing with parallel proceedings involving the same mark accordingly.
osnova za žalbu na temelju koje se traži poništaj odluke protiv koje se podnosi žalba u opsegu koji je utvrđen u skladu s člankom 21. stavkom 1. točkom (e) ove Uredbe;
Article 28
činjenice, dokaze i argumente kojima se potkrjepljuju navedene osnove koji su podneseni u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 55. stavka 2.
Communications by the Board of Appeal
Obrazloženje se podnosi na jeziku žalbenog postupka koji je utvrđen u skladu s člankom 21. stavcima 2. i 3.
Communications by the Board of Appeal in the course of the examination of the appeal or with a view to facilitating an amicable settlement of proceedings shall be prepared by the rapporteur and shall be signed by the rapporteur on behalf of the Board of Appeal, in agreement with the chairperson of the Board of Appeal.
Ako je obrazloženje podneseno na drugom službenom jeziku Unije, podnositelj žalbe mora dostaviti prijevod obrazloženja u roku od mjesec dana od datuma podnošenja izvornog obrazloženja.
Where a Board of Appeal communicates with the parties regarding its provisional opinion on matters of fact or law, it shall state that it is not bound by such a communication.
Članak 23.
Article 29
Dopuštenost žalbe
Comments on questions of general interest
Žalbeno vijeće odbija žalbu kao nedopuštenu u sljedećim slučajevima:
The Board of Appeal may, on its own initiative or upon the written, reasoned request of the Executive Director of the Office, invite the Executive Director to comment on questions of general interest which arise in the course of proceedings pending before it.
ako obavijest o žalbi nije podnesena u roku od dva mjeseca od datuma obavijesti o odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba;
The parties shall be entitled to submit their observations on the Executive Director's comments.
ako žalba nije u skladu s člancima 58. i 59.
Article 30
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 ili s onima iz članka 21. stavka 1. točke (d) i članka 21. stavaka 2. i 3. ove Uredbe, osim ako su ti nedostaci ispravljeni u roku od četiri mjeseca od datuma obavijesti o odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba;
Reopening of the examination of absolute grounds
ako obavijest o žalbi nije u skladu s uvjetima propisanima u članku 21. stavku 1. točkama (a), (b), (c) i (e) i podnositelj žalbe, unatoč tome što ga je žalbeno vijeće obavijestilo, nije ispravio te nedostatke u roku koji je ono za to odredilo;
Where, in ex parte proceedings, the Board of Appeal considers that an absolute ground for refusal may be applicable to goods or services listed in the trade mark application which do not form part of the subject matter of the appeal, it shall inform the examiner competent for examining that application who may decide to re-open the examination pursuant to Article 40(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 with respect to those goods or services.
ako obrazloženje žalbe nije podneseno u roku od četiri mjeseca od datuma obavijesti o odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba;
Where a decision of the Opposition Division is subject to an appeal, the Board of Appeal may, by means of a reasoned interim decision and without prejudice to Article 58(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, suspend the appeal proceedings and remit the contested application to the examiner competent for examining that application with a recommendation to re-open the examination pursuant to Article 40(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, where it considers that an absolute ground for refusal shall apply to some or all of the goods or services listed in the trade mark application.
ako obrazloženje žalbe nije u skladu s uvjetima propisanima u članku 22. stavku 1. točkama (a) i (b) podnositelj žalbe, unatoč tome što ga je žalbeno vijeće obavijestilo, nije ispravio te nedostatke u roku koji je ono za to odredilo ili nije dostavio prijevod obrazloženja u roku od mjeseca dana od podnošenja izvornog obrazloženja u skladu s člankom 22. stavkom 2.
Where the contested application has been remitted in application of paragraph 2, the examiner shall inform the Board of Appeal without delay whether or not the examination of the contested application has been re-opened.
Ako se čini da je žalba nedopuštena, predsjedatelj žalbenog vijeća kojem je predmet dodijeljen u skladu s člankom 35. stavkom 1. može zatražiti od žalbenog vijeća da bez odgode odluči o dopuštenosti žalbe prije nego što branjenik bude obaviješten o žalbi ili o obrazloženju, ovisno o slučaju.
Where the examination has been re-opened, the appeal proceedings shall remain suspended until the examiner's decision has been taken and, where the contested application is rejected in whole or in part, until the examiner's decision to this effect has become final.
Žalbeno vijeće izjavljuje da se smatra da žalba nije podnesena ako je pristojba za podnošenje žalbe plaćena nakon isteka roka utvrđenog u članku 60. stavku 1. prvoj rečenici Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
Article 31
U tom slučaju primjenjuje se stavak 2. ovog članka.
Examination of an appeal as a matter of priority
Članak 24.
Upon reasoned request of the appellant or of the defendant and after hearing the other party, the Board of Appeal may decide, having regard to the particular urgency and the circumstances of the case, to examine the appeal as a matter of priority, without prejudice to the provisions in Articles 23 and 26, including the provisions on time-limits.
Odgovor
The request for the examination of the appeal as a matter of priority may be filed at any time in the course of the appeal proceedings.
U postupku inter partes branjenik može podnijeti odgovor u roku od dva mjeseca od datuma obavijesti o obrazloženju podnositelja žalbe.
It shall be filed in a separate document and shall be supported by evidence as to the urgency and the particular circumstances of the case.
U iznimnim okolnostima taj se rok može produljiti na temelju obrazloženog zahtjeva branjenika.
Article 32
Odgovor sadržava ime i adresu branjenika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431 i u skladu je, mutatis mutandis, s uvjetima iz članka 21. stavka 1. točaka (b), (c) i (d), članka 22. stavka 1. točaka (a) i (c) i članka 22. stavka 2. ove Uredbe.
Formal content of the Board of Appeal's decision
Članak 25.
The Board of Appeal's decision shall contain:
Protužalba
a statement that it is delivered by the Boards of Appeal;
Ako branjenik traži donošenje odluke kojom se poništava ili izmjenjuje osporena odluka u točki koja nije navedena u žalbi, u skladu s člankom 60. stavkom 2.
the date when the decision was taken;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, ta se protužalba podnosi u roku za podnošenje odgovora u skladu s člankom 24. stavkom 1. ove Uredbe.
the names of the parties and of their representatives;
Protužalba se podnosi u zasebnom dokumentu od odgovora.
the number of the appeal to which it refers and an identification of the decision subject to appeal in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 21(1)(d);
Protužalba sadržava ime i adresu branjenika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431 i u skladu je, mutatis mutandis, s uvjetima iz članka 21. stavka 1. točaka (b) do (e) i članka 22. ove Uredbe.
an indication as to the formation of the Board of Appeal;
Protužalba se odbija kao nedopuštena u sljedećim slučajevima:
the name and, without prejudice to Article 39(5), the signature of the chairperson and members which took part in the decision, including an indication who acted as rapporteur in the case, or, where the decision is delivered by a single member, the name and signature of the member who took the decision;
ako nije podnesena u roku propisanom u stavku 1.;
the name and the signature of the Registrar or, as the case may be, of the member of the Registry signing on the Registrar's behalf;
ako nije podnesena uzimajući u obzir uvjete propisane u stavku 2. ili u članku 21. stavku 1. točki (d);
a summary of the facts and of the arguments submitted by the parties;
ako nije u skladu s uvjetima propisanima u stavku 3. i branjenik, unatoč tome što ga je žalbeno vijeće o tome obavijestilo, nije ispravio te nedostatke u roku koji je ono za to odredilo ili nije dostavio prijevod protužalbe i pripadajućeg obrazloženja u roku od mjeseca dana od podnošenja izvorne protužalbe.
a statement of the reasons for which the decision has been taken;
Podnositelj žalbe poziva se da dostavi primjedbe na protužalbu branjenika u roku od dva mjeseca od datuma dostavljanja obavijesti podnositelju žalbe.
the order of the Board of Appeal, including, where necessary, a decision on costs.
U iznimnim slučajevima žalbeno vijeće može produljiti rok na temelju obrazloženog zahtjeva podnositelja žalbe.
Article 33
Članak 26. primjenjuje se mutatis mutandis.
Reimbursement of the appeal fee
Članak 26.
The appeal fee shall be reimbursed by order of the Board of Appeal in either of the following events:
Replika i odgovor na repliku u postupcima inter partes
where the appeal is not deemed to have been filed in accordance with the second sentence of Article 60(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
Na temelju obrazloženog zahtjeva podnositelja žalbe koji je podnesen u roku od dva tjedna od obavijesti o odgovoru, žalbeno vijeće može, u skladu s člankom 63. stavkom 2.
where the decision-making instance of the Office which adopted the contested decision grants revision pursuant to Article 61(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 or revokes the contested decision in application of Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, ovlastiti podnositelja žalbe da replikom nadopuni obrazloženje u roku koji ono odredi.
where, following re-opening of the examination proceedings within the meaning of Article 40(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 upon the Board of Appeal's recommendation pursuant to Article 30(2) of this Regulation, the contested application has been rejected by final decision of the examiner and the appeal has become devoid of purpose as a consequence thereof;
U tom slučaju žalbeno vijeće može ovlastiti branjenika da odgovor nadopuni odgovorom na repliku u roku koji ono odredi.
where the Board of Appeal considers such reimbursement equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation.
Članak 27.
Article 34
Ispitivanje žalbe
Revision and revocation of the decision subject to appeal
U postupku ex parte i u pogledu proizvoda ili usluga koje čine dio predmeta žalbe, žalbeno vijeće, u skladu s člankom 40. stavkom 3.
Where, in ex parte proceedings, the appeal is not rejected pursuant to Article 23(1), the Board of Appeal shall submit the notice of appeal and the statement of grounds of appeal to the instance of the Office which adopted the contested decision for the purposes of Article 61 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, postupa u skladu s člankom 37.
Where the instance of the Office which adopted the decision subject to appeal decides to grant revision pursuant to Article 61(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, it shall inform the Board of Appeal thereof without delay.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 kada navodi osnovu za odbijanje prijave žiga na koju se nije već pozvalo u odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba na temelju primjene te odredbe.
Where the instance of the Office which adopted the decision subject to appeal has initiated the procedure for revoking the decision subject to appeal pursuant to Article 80(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, it shall inform the Board of Appeal thereof without delay for the purposes of Article 71 of this Regulation.
U postupku inter partes ispitivanje žalbe i, ovisno o slučaju, protužalbe, ograničeni su na osnove navedene u obrazloženju i, ovisno o slučaju, u protužalbi.
It shall also inform the Board of Appeal without delay about the final outcome of that procedure.
Pravna pitanja koja stranke nisu navele žalbeno vijeće razmatra samo ako se odnose na bitne postupovne zahtjeve ili ako ih je nužno riješiti kako bi se osigurala ispravna primjena Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 uzimajući u obzir činjenice, dokaze i argumente koje su navele stranke.
Article 35
Ispitivanje žalbe uključuje sljedeće tvrdnje ili zahtjeve, pod uvjetom da su navedene u obrazloženju žalbe ili, ovisno o slučaju, u protužalbi te pod uvjetom da su na vrijeme uvedene u postupak pred odjelom Ureda koji je donio odluku protiv koje se podnosi žalba
Allocation of an appeal to a Board and designation of a rapporteur
razlikovni karakter stečen uporabom kako je navedeno u članku 7. stavku 3. i članku 52. stavku 2.
As soon as the notice of appeal has been filed, the President of the Boards shall allocate the case to a Board of Appeal according to the objective criteria determined by the Presidium of the Boards of Appeal referred to in Article 136(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009;
For each case allocated to a Board of Appeal pursuant to paragraph 1, its chairperson shall designate a member of that Board of Appeal, or the chairperson, as rapporteur.
prepoznatljivost ranijeg žiga na tržištu stečenu uporabom za potrebe članka 8. stavka 1. točke (b) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009;
Where a case falls under the authority of a single member pursuant to Article 36(1), the Board of Appeal handling a case shall designate the rapporteur as single member pursuant to Article 135(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
dokaz o uporabi u skladu s člankom 42. stavcima 2. i 3.
Where a decision of a Board of Appeal on a case has been annulled or altered by a final ruling of the General Court or, as the case may be, of the Court of Justice, the President of the Boards of Appeal shall, with a view to complying with that ruling in accordance with Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, re-allocate the case pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article to a Board of Appeal, which shall not comprise those members which had adopted the annulled decision, except where the case is referred to the enlarged Board of Appeal (‘Grand Board’) or where the annulled decision had been taken by the Grand Board.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 ili člankom 57. stavcima 2. i 3.
Where several appeals are filed against the same decision, those appeals shall be considered in the same proceedings.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
Where appeals involving the same parties are filed against separate decisions concerning the same mark, or have other relevant factual or legal elements in common, those appeals may be considered in joined proceedings with the consent of the parties.
U skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2.
Article 36
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, žalbeno vijeće može prihvatiti činjenice ili dokaze koji su prvi puta podneseni samo ako te činjenice i dokazi ispunjavaju sljedeće zahtjeve:
Cases falling under the authority of a single member
oni će, na prvi pogled, vjerojatno biti relevantni za ishod predmeta; i
The Board of Appeal handling the case may designate a single member within the meaning of Article 135(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 for the purposes of the following decisions:
nisu dostavljeni na vrijeme iz valjanih razloga, posebno ako se njima samo dopunjuju relevantne činjenice i dokazi koji su već na vrijeme dostavljeni ili se podnose radi osporavanja zaključaka ili ih ispituje prvi stupanj na vlastitu inicijativu u odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba.
decisions pursuant to Article 23;
Žalbeno vijeće, najkasnije u svojoj odluci o žalbi i, ovisno o slučaju, protužalbi, odlučuje o zahtjevima za ograničavanje, razdvajanje ili djelomično odricanje od osporenog žiga koje je podnositelj zahtjeva ili vlasnik dostavio tijekom žalbenog postupka u skladu s člankom 43., 44. ili 50.
decisions closing the appeal proceedings following withdrawal, rejection, surrender or cancellation of the contested or the earlier mark;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
decisions closing the appeal proceedings following withdrawal of the opposition, of the request for revocation or for declaration of invalidity or of the appeal;
Ako žalbeno vijeće prihvati ograničenje, razdvajanje ili djelomično odricanje, ono bez odgode obavješćuje odjel zadužen za registar i sve odjele koji rješavaju usporedne postupke povezane s istim žigom.
decisions on measures pursuant to Article 79d(1) and Article 80(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, provided that the correction or, as the case may be, the revocation of the decision on the appeal concerns a decision taken by a single member;
Članak 28.