natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The manufacturer stated that with respect to the lights on the control panels, there could be minor confusion.
Boje tih triju svjetala bile su različito poredane na različitim strojevima pa bi se ona mogla pogrešno protumačiti.
Regarding the clear visibility and marking of the control devices, the manufacturer admitted some mismatches between the actual machines, the labels and the manuals.
Znak za zaustavljanje u nuždi postavljen je naopačke.
Furthermore, the manufacturer stated that the labels, having no impact to safety functions, did not have to be necessarily translated.
Proizvođač je naveo da u pogledu svjetala na upravljačkim pločama može doći do manjih nedoumica.
Furthermore, the EHSR 1.2.2 requires also that control devices must be designed to prevent its operation if there is someone in the danger zone.
Kad je riječ o jasnoj vidljivosti i obilježavanju kontrolnih uređaja, proizvođač je priznao određene neusklađenosti među samim automatima, oznakama i priručnicima.
According to Sweden, the machine could be restarted even though the operator did not have an overview of the danger zone, which entailed the risk of someone being inside the risk area.
Nadalje, proizvođač je naveo da oznake koje ne utječu na sigurnosne funkcije ne treba nužno prevesti.
The manufacturer disagreed with Sweden on the operator's poor visibility from the control zone due to the absence of reported safety incidents and other Member States' conclusions that ‘the visibility, while perhaps not perfect, was indeed adequate given that the operator practiced reasonable and expected care while when starting the machines’.
Nadalje, temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevom 1.2.2. zahtijeva se i da kontrolni uređaji moraju biti izrađeni tako da je onemogućeno njegovo pokretanje ako se netko nalazi u opasnom području.
However, the Commission considers that relying on the expected care of the operator when starting the machine does not address the risk because the remaining lack of overview of the danger zone prevents the operator from checking if there is someone in the danger zone.
Švedska tvrdi da bi se stroj mogao ponovno pokrenuti i u situaciji kad operater nema pregled nad opasnim područjem, što predstavlja opasnost da bi se netko mogao naći unutar rizičnog područja.
Thus, considering the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, it can be concluded that the EHSRs set out in Section 1.2.2 and 1.7.1 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine and the supplementary kit.
Proizvođač se nije složio sa Švedskom u pogledu slabe vidljivosti koju operater ima iz kontrolnog područja s obzirom na to da ne postoje prijavljeni incidenti u vezi sa sigurnošću te s obzirom na zaključke drugih država članica da iako možda nije optimalna, vidljivost je zaista primjerena ako operater s odgovarajućom i očekivanom pažnjom pokreće strojeve.
The EHSR 1.1.6 on ergonomics, 1.6.1 on machinery maintenance and 1.6.2 on access to operating positions and servicing points, require a design and construction of the machine that ease the operator's work, allowing him to work in a comfortable and safe way, outside danger zones.
Međutim, Komisija smatra da se oslanjanjem na očekivanu pažnju operatera pri pokretanju stroja ne otklanja rizik jer je opasno područje i dalje nepregledno, što operatera sprečava da provjeri je li netko u opasnom području.
In this respect, Sweden highlighted that the access points and work platforms of the pinsetter machines at stake would not respect these EHSRs because the access route that doubles as a work platform between those machines was measured to be only 190 mm.
Stoga, uzimajući u obzir navedene argumente i studiju kojom se potvrđuju ti argumenti, može se zaključiti da nisu ispunjeni temeljni zdravstveni i sigurnosni zahtjevi utvrđeni u odjeljku 1.2.2. i 1.7.1.
In some cases, the operators were requested to balance on narrow metal edges.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ u vezi s automatom za postavljanje čunjeva i dodatnom opremom.
This work environment entailed an unnecessary risk of falling into the machine.
Prema temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevima 1.1.6. o ergonomiji, 1.6.1. o održavanju strojeva i 1.6.2. o pristupu upravljačkim mjestima i mjestima servisiranja potrebno je konstruirati i izraditi stroj koji će olakšati rad operatera omogućujući mu da radi na udoban i siguran način izvan opasnih područja.
In addition, the access route between these machines ended abruptly by the front where there is a risk of falling approximately from 1000 mm.
U tom je pogledu Švedska istaknula da pristupne točke i radne platforme dotičnih automata za postavljanje čunjeva ne ispunjavaju te temeljne zdravstvene i sigurnosne zahtjeve zato što pristupni put koji je ujedno i radna platforma između tih strojeva iznosi samo 190 mm.
In its EC declaration of conformity, the manufacturer referred to the harmonised standard EN ISO 14122-2:2001 but did not provide in the technical file a link between the references of the harmonised standards and the respective EHSR as required by Annex VII to Directive 2006/42/EC.
U nekim slučajevima operateri su morali održavati ravnotežu na uskim metalnim rubovima.
Despite this deficiency on the side of the manufacturer, Sweden identified the EHSR that the reference to that harmonised standard could have covered.
Takvo radno okruženje predstavljalo je nepotreban rizik da operater upadne u stroj.
Specifically, Sweden identified that the reference to the harmonised standard concerned the EHSR set out in Sections 1.1.6, 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC.
Osim toga, pristupni put između tih strojeva naglo se prekida na prednjem dijelu, zbog čega postoji rizik da se padne s otprilike 1000 mm.
Harmonised standard EN ISO 14122-2:2001 lays down safety technical requirements for permanent means of access to machinery and specifically for machinery working platforms and walkways.
Proizvođač u svojoj EZ izjavi o sukladnosti upućuje na usklađenu normu EN ISO 14122-2:2001, ali u tehničkoj dokumentaciji nije naveo vezu između upućivanja na usklađene norme i odgovarajućeg temeljnog zdravstvenog i sigurnosnog zahtjeva, kako je propisano Prilogom VII.
Sweden stated that whilst the standard in question requires a 500 mm of width, the pinsetter machine walkway at stake was 190 mm wide.
Direktivi 2006/42/EZ.
In this respect, the manufacturer stated that the narrow walkway of 190 mm was considered a safe and appropriate width bearing in mind the intended and expected use, the frequency of access and the state of the art for the ball return area even though it did not fully apply EN ISO 14122-2:2001.
Unatoč tom propustu proizvođača Švedska je utvrdila temeljni zdravstveni i sigurnosni zahtjev koji bi mogao biti obuhvaćen upućivanjem na tu usklađenu normu.
Therefore, although the manufacturer had referred to that standard in the declaration of conformity, it did not apply it.
Švedska je konkretno utvrdila da se upućivanje na usklađenu normu odnosi na temeljne zdravstvene i sigurnosne zahtjeve utvrđene u odjeljcima 1.1.6., 1.6.1. i 1.6.2.
Regarding the risk of falling associated with access in front of the pinsetter machine, the manufacturer estimated that the alternative platform for an easier access on and off to the front platform, requested by Sweden, was not necessary because the front access to the pinsetter machine is very infrequent considering the design of existing machines in the world, where access is provided primarily from the back.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ.
The Commission considers that the risk of injury when accessing the pinsetter machines (by falling or lacking balance) due to the narrow walkway between the machines or to an abrupt end of the front of the machine of 1000 mm cannot be neglected by arguing an infrequent access or the impossibility to do better.
Usklađenom normom EN ISO 14122-2:2001 utvrđuju se sigurnosni tehnički zahtjevi za trajni način prilaza strojevima, a posebno za radne platforme i prolaze.
Thus, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, it can be concluded that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.1.6, 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine.
Švedska je navela da iako se predmetnom normom propisuje širina od 500 mm, širina prolaza predmetnog automata za postavljanje čunjeva bila je 190 mm.
As regards the EHSR set out in Sections 1.3.8 and 1.4 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC, Sweden indicated that the screens between the pinsetter machines must be high enough to prevent workers to be in contact with dangerous, moving parts of adjacent machines, which are in operation.
U tom je pogledu proizvođač naveo da se smatra da je uski prolaz od 190 mm siguran i odgovarajuće širine uzimajući u obzir predviđenu i očekivanu upotrebu, učestalost pristupa i najsuvremeniju tehniku kanala za povrat kugli iako norma EN ISO 14122-2:2001 nije u potpunosti primijenjena.
The screen must cover the entire side of the machine i.e. right up to the front of the machine cage.
Stoga, iako proizvođač u izjavi o sukladnosti upućuje na tu normu, nije ju primijenio.
However, the fence of the pinsetter that was mounted between the machines was only 500 mm high at some workstations and was completely missing at other places where people were working.
U pogledu rizika od pada povezanog s pristupom prednjoj strani automata za postavljanje čunjeva, proizvođač je procijenio da dodatna platforma za lakši pristup i silazak s prednje platforme, koju je zatražila Švedska, nije potrebna jer se prednjoj strani automata za postavljanje čunjeva vrlo rijetko pristupa s obzirom na konstruiranje postojećih strojeva u svijetu kod kojih se strojevima pristupa prvenstveno odostraga.
This entailed a risk of falling down into the adjoining machine.
Komisija smatra da se rizik od ozljede prilikom pristupanja automatu za postavljanje čunjeva (zbog pada ili gubitka ravnoteže) zbog uskog prolaza između strojeva ili naglog završetka prednjeg dijela stroja na visini od 1000 mm ne može zanemariti tvrdeći da takav pristup nije učestao ili da poboljšanja nisu moguća.
Therefore, that structure would not comply with the EHSR 1.3.8 on the choice of protection against risks arising from moving parts.
Stoga, uzimajući u obzir navedene argumente i studiju kojom se potvrđuju ti argumenti, može se zaključiti da nisu ispunjeni temeljni zdravstveni i sigurnosni zahtjevi utvrđeni u odjeljcima 1.1.6., 1.6.1. i 1.6.2.
In its EC declaration of conformity, the manufacturer referred to the harmonised standard EN ISO 13857:2008 but did not provide in the technical file a link between the references of the harmonised standards and the respective EHSR as required by Annex VII to Directive 2006/42/EC.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ u vezi s automatom za postavljanje čunjeva.
Specifically, Sweden identified that the reference to the harmonised standard concerned the EHSR set out in Sections 1.3.8 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC.
U pogledu temeljnih zdravstvenih i sigurnosnih zahtjeva utvrđenih u odjeljcima 1.3.8. i 1.4.
Harmonised standard EN ISO 13857:2008 lays down technical requirements on machinery safety distances to prevent hazard zones being reached by upper and lower limbs.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ Švedska je navela da zasloni između automata za postavljanje čunjeva moraju biti dovoljno visoko da spriječe doticaj radnika s opasnim, pokretnim dijelovima susjednih strojeva koji rade.
Sweden refers to this standard to reinforce its justification on the manufacturer's lack of compliance with EHSRs 1.3.8.
Zaslon mora pokrivati cijelu stranu stroja, odnosno sve do prednje strane metalnog okvira.
Despite the standard being referred to in the declaration of conformity, the manufacturer did not rely on the standard to prove the conformity of the product with the Directive when providing explanations to the Swedish authorities.
Međutim, ograda automata za postavljanje čunjeva koja je postavljena između automata na nekim je radnim stanicama bila visoka samo 500 mm, a na drugim mjestima na kojima se radi uopće je nije bilo.
Instead, the manufacturer specified that the 500 mm fence mounted between the machines was designed to provide maximum protection while still accommodating the height requirements of common ceiling heights throughout Europe.
Zbog toga je postojao rizik da se upadne u susjedni stroj.
A higher guard would provide a measure of incremental safety but this incremental safety would be diminished if ceiling obstructions prevented installation of the guards or if the guards were incorrectly modified to accommodate ceiling obstructions.
Stoga ta konstrukcija ne bi bila u skladu s temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevom 1.3.8. o izboru zaštite od rizika nastalih od pokretnih dijelova.
The Commission considers that to keep the fence of the pinsetter, mounted between the machines, at 500 mm high due to ceiling obstructions, does not explain why at some workstations the fences were completely missing and it does not tackle the risk of falling down into the adjoining machine.
Proizvođač u svojoj EZ izjavi o sukladnosti upućuje na usklađenu normu EN ISO 13857:2008, ali u tehničkoj dokumentaciji nije naveo vezu između upućivanja na usklađene norme i odgovarajućeg temeljnog zdravstvenog i sigurnosnog zahtjeva, kako je propisano Prilogom VII.
Thus, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments it can be concluded that the EHSRs set out in Section 1.3.8 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine and the supplementary kit.
Direktivi 2006/42/EZ.
Furthermore, as regards the pinsetter machine Sweden explained that the machine cage contained small doors that could be opened but did not have a locking mechanism that stops the machine when the doors were opened.
Švedska je konkretno utvrdila da se upućivanje na usklađenu normu odnosi na temeljni zdravstveni i sigurnosni zahtjev iz odjeljka 1.3.8.
In its EC declaration of conformity, the manufacturer referred to the harmonised standard EN 953:1998 but did not provide in the technical file a link between the references of the harmonised standards and the respective EHSR as required by Annex VII to Directive 2006/42/EC.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ.
Specifically, Sweden identified that the reference to the harmonised standard concerned the EHSR set out in Sections 1.3.8 and 1.4 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC.
Usklađenom normom EN ISO 13857:2008 utvrđuju se tehnički zahtjevi o sigurnosnoj udaljenosti radi sprečavanja dosezanja opasnih područja gornjim i donjim ekstremitetima.
Harmonised standard EN 953:1997+A1:2009 lays down safety technical requirements on machinery guards and the general requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards.
Švedska upućuje na tu normu kako bi potkrijepila svoje obrazloženje o neusklađenosti proizvođača s temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevom 1.3.8.
Sweden refers to this standard to reinforce its justification on the manufacturer's lack of compliance with EHSRs 1.3.8 and 1.4.
Unatoč tome što se na normu upućuje u izjavi o sukladnosti, obrazloženje za dokazivanje usklađenosti proizvoda s Direktivom koje je proizvođač dao švedskim tijelima nije se temeljilo na toj normi.
In this regard, the manufacturer explained that the fact that the machine cage contained a second smaller door into each cell with no interlock that stopped the machine was not contrary to Directive 2006/42/EC because the rear division guards required very infrequent access and fixed guards provided enough safety in this case.
Umjesto toga, proizvođač je naveo da je ograda između strojeva koja je visoka 500 mm konstruirana tako da pruža najveću moguću zaštitu te istodobno ispunjava zahtjeve u pogledu normalne visine stropova diljem Europe.
The manufacturer indicated that based on this justification and on EN 953, a fixed guard was selected.
Viši štitnik pružao bi nešto veću sigurnost, ali bi ta dodatna sigurnost bila umanjena kad bi stropne zapreke sprečavale postavljanje štitnika ili kad bi se štitnik nepravilno preinačio radi prilagodbe stropnim zaprekama.
It did not address the absence of the interlocking mechanism.
Komisija smatra da se zadržavanjem ograde automata, postavljene između automata, na visini od 500 mm zbog stropnih zapreka ne objašnjava zašto na nekim radnim stanicama ograde uopće nije bilo i ne isključuje rizik od pada u susjedni automat.
The Commission considers that the risk arising from moving parts was not addressed because the locking mechanism did not stop the machine when the worker approached it.
Stoga, uzimajući u obzir navedene argumente i studiju kojom se potvrđuju ti argumenti, može se zaključiti da nisu ispunjeni temeljni zdravstveni i sigurnosni zahtjevi utvrđeni u odjeljku 1.3.8.
Thus, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, it can be concluded that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.3.8 and 1.4 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ u vezi s automatom za postavljanje čunjeva i dodatnom opremom.
Sweden also indicated that the protective cap over the ball return mechanism did not meet the ESHR on fixed guards set out in Section 1.4.2.1 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC as it was not fixed in any way and it did not meet the requirements for interlocking guards set out in Section 1.4.2.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC since there was no interlocking mechanism.
Nadalje, Švedska je u vezi s automatom za postavljanje čunjeva objasnila da se metalni okvir sastoji od malenih vrata koja se mogu otvoriti, ali nemaju mehanizam za blokiranje koji zaustavlja stroj kada su vrata otvorena.
Sweden referred also in this case to EN 953:1997+A1:2009 to reinforce its justification on the manufacturer's lack of compliance with EHSRs 1.4.2.1 and 1.4.2.2.
Proizvođač u svojoj EZ izjavi o sukladnosti upućuje na usklađenu normu EN 953:1998, ali u tehničkoj dokumentaciji nije naveo vezu između upućivanja na usklađene norme i odgovarajućeg temeljnog zdravstvenog i sigurnosnog zahtjeva, kako je propisano Prilogom VII.
However, the manufacturer stated that the access into the ball return cover was required far less frequently than once per shift and limited its explanations to a statement that a fixed guard was recommended by the standards.
Direktivi 2006/42/EZ.
In its view, there was no need to take the actions required by Sweden.
Švedska je konkretno utvrdila da se upućivanje na usklađenu normu odnosi na temeljne zdravstvene i sigurnosne zahtjeve utvrđene u odjeljcima 1.3.8. i 1.4.
The Commission considers that the risk arising from moving parts was not addressed in the protective cap over the ball return mechanism because, in addition to the absence of interlocking mechanisms, the fixed guards were not fixed.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ.
Thus, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, it can be concluded that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.4.2.1 and 1.4.2.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine.
Usklađenom normom EN 953:1997+A1:2009 utvrđuju se sigurnosni tehnički zahtjevi za zaštitu stroja i opći zahtjevi za projektiranje i izvedbu pomičnih i nepomičnih zaštita.
As regards the EHSR set out in Sections 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 and 1.7.4.2, regarding the requirements on instructions, Sweden informed that a posted picture on the pinsetter machine and the supplementary kit was supposed to show where the guards were located, but it did not correspond to where they were actually located on the machine.
Švedska upućuje na tu normu kako bi potkrijepila svoje obrazloženje o neusklađenosti proizvođača s temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevima 1.3.8. i 1.4.
As for the user instructions, Sweden said that there were no instructions for use corresponding to the machines delivered and which should cover the various operations to be performed.
U tom pogledu, proizvođač je objasnio da to što se metalni okvir sastoji od drugih manjih vrata za svaku ćeliju bez uređaja za zabravljivanje koji bi zaustavio stroj nije u suprotnosti s Direktivom 2006/42/EZ jer stražnji razvodni štitnici rijetko zahtijevaju pristup pa u tom slučaju pričvršćeni štitnici pružaju dovoljnu sigurnost.
Regarding the absence of operating and instructions manual, the manufacturer stated that translated manuals were supplied with the machines so it could be possible that the manuals were misplaced at the inspected bowling centre.
Proizvođač je naveo da su na temelju tog obrazloženja i EN 953 odabrani pričvršćeni štitnici.
Labels having no impact on safety functions were not translated.
Proizvođač nije obrazložio nepostojanje mehanizma za blokiranje.
Furthermore, the machine labels and manuals observed by the inspectors may not have matched the machine due to manufacturer's accommodation of specific demands from regional inspectors and the time constraints to adapt to those demands.
Komisija smatra da nije riješen problem rizika koji proizlazi iz pokretnih dijelova stroja jer mehanizam za blokiranje ne zaustavlja stroj kad mu se radnik približi.
The Commission considers, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 and 1.7.4.2 Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine and the supplementary kit.
Stoga, uzimajući u obzir navedene argumente i studiju kojom se potvrđuju ti argumenti, može se zaključiti da nisu ispunjeni temeljni zdravstveni i sigurnosni zahtjevi utvrđeni u odjeljcima 1.3.8. i 1.4.
EHSR set out in Section 1.1.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC regarding principles of safety integration requires that machinery must be designed and constructed to prevent putting persons at risk when operating the machinery under the conditions foreseen but also taking into account any reasonably foreseeable misuse.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ u vezi s automatom za postavljanje čunjeva.
Sweden indicated that the mounting brackets used for the safety interlocks were fastened with standard screws, which are easy to remove with standard tools, contrary to the principle of safety integration.
Švedska je navela i da zaštitni poklopac na mehanizmu za vraćanje kugli nije u skladu s temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevom u vezi s pričvršćenim štitnicima iz odjeljka 1.4.2.1.
This entails a risk of foreseeable misuse to defeat the mounting brackets instead using the interlocked doors.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ jer uopće nije pričvršćen i ne ispunjava zahtjeve o blokirajućim štitnicima utvrđene u odjeljku 1.4.2.2.
The manufacturer stated that the reason was that the interlocked doors provide reasonable access that reduces the operator's motivation to defeat the interlocks when making extensive maintenance.
Priloga I. Direktivi 2006/42/EZ s obzirom na to da nema mehanizma za blokiranje.
Standard screws would reduce the risk of permanent damage to the guarding system or permanent removal of the guards.
Švedska je i u tom slučaju uputila na EN 953:1997+A1:2009 kako bi potkrijepila svoje obrazloženje o neusklađenosti proizvođača s temeljnim zdravstvenim i sigurnosnim zahtjevima 1.4.2.1. i 1.4.2.2.
Furthermore, Sweden explained that the fixed guards were mounted with quick-release fasteners, which entailed a risk that someone would open the fixed guard and use it for access instead of using the interlocked door.
Međutim, proizvođač je naveo da se poklopcu na mehanizmu za vraćanje kugli prilazi puno rjeđe nego jedanput po smjeni te je ograničio svoje tumačenje na izjavu da se u normama preporučuje pričvršćeni štitnik.
Sweden added that where the risk assessment shows that there should be a fixed guard, it must not be designed in such a way that it is an attractive option to access the machine by opening the fixed guard rather than by using the locked gate.
Prema njegovu mišljenju mjere koje je zahtijevala Švedska nije trebalo poduzeti.