natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any related substance (including its salts and polymers) having a linear or branched perfluorooctyl group with the formula C8F17- as one of the structural elements.
Tvari srodne PFOA-i one su tvari za koje se, na temelju njihove molekularne strukture, smatra da se mogu razgraditi ili pretvoriti u PFOA-u.
The following substances are excluded from this designation:
Uredba (EZ) br. 850/2004 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 29. travnja 2004. o postojanim organskim onečišćujućim tvarima i izmjeni Direktive 79/117/EEZ (SL L 158, 30.4.2004., str. 7.).
C8F17-X, where X = F, Cl, Br.
PRILOG
C8F17-C(=O)OH, C8F17-C(=O)O-X′ or C8F17-CF2-X′ (where X′ = any group, including salts).
U Prilogu XVII.
Shall not be manufactured, or placed on the market as substances on their own from 4 July 2020.
Uredbi (EZ) br. 1907/2006 dodaje se sljedeći unos:
Shall not, from 4 July 2020, be used in the production of, or placed on the market in:
Perfluorooktanska kiselina (PFOA)
another substance, as a constituent;
CAS br. 335-67-1
a mixture;
EZ br. 206-397-9
an article,
i njezine soli.
in a concentration equal to or above 25 ppb of PFOA including its salts or 1000 ppb of one or a combination of PFOA-related substances.
Sve povezane tvari (uključujući njihove soli i polimere) s linearnom ili razgranatom perfluoroheptilnom skupinom formule C7F15 koja je, kao jedan od strukturnih elemenata, izravno vezana na drugi atom ugljika.
Points 1 and 2 shall apply from:
Sve povezane tvari (uključujući njihove soli i polimere) s linearnom ili razgranatom perfluorooktilnom skupinom formule C8F17 kao jednim od strukturnih elemenata.
4 July 2022 to:
Sljedeće tvari nisu obuhvaćene ovom oznakom:
equipment used to manufacture semi-conductors;
C8F17-X, pri čemu je X = F, Cl, Br.
latex printing inks.
C8F17-C(= O)OH, C8F17-C(= O)O-X′ ili C8F17-CF2-X′ (pri čemu je X′ = bilo koja skupina, uključujući soli).
4 July 2023 to:
Ne smiju se proizvoditi ni stavljati na tržište kao pojedinačne tvari od 4. srpnja 2020.
textiles for the protection of workers from risks to their health and safety;
Ne smiju se od 4. srpnja 2020. upotrebljavati u proizvodnji ni stavljati na tržište u:
membranes intended for use in medical textiles, filtration in water treatment, production processes and effluent treatment;
drugoj tvari, kao njezin sastavni dio;
plasma nano-coatings.
smjesi;
4 July 2032 to medical devices other than implantable medical devices within the scope of Directive 93/42/EEC.
proizvodu
Points 1 and 2 shall not apply to any of the following:
u koncentraciji jednakoj ili većoj od 25 ppb za PFOA-u, uključujući njezine soli, ili 1000 ppb za jednu od tvari srodnih PFOA-i ili njihovu kombinaciju.
perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its derivatives, which are listed in Part A of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004;
Točke 1. i 2. primjenjuju se od:
the manufacture of a substance where this occurs as an unavoidable by-product of the manufacture of fluorochemicals with a carbon chain equal to or shorter than 6 atoms;
4. srpnja 2022. na:
a substance that is to be used, or is used as a transported isolated intermediate, provided that the conditions in points (a) to (f) of Article 18(4) of this Regulation are met;
i. opremu koja se koristi za proizvodnju poluvodiča;
a substance, constituent of another substance or mixture that is to be used, or is used:
lateks tinte.
in the production of implantable medical devices within the scope of Directive 93/42/EEC;
4. srpnja 2023. na:
in photographic coatings applied to films, papers or printing plates;
i. tekstile za zaštitu radnika od rizika za njihovo zdravlje i sigurnost;
in photo-lithography processes for semiconductors or in etching processes for compound semiconductors;
membrane namijenjene upotrebi u medicinskim tekstilima, filtraciji u pročišćavanju vode, proizvodnim procesima i obradi efluenata;
concentrated fire-fighting foam mixtures that were placed on the market before 4 July 2020 and are to be used, or are used in the production of other fire-fighting foam mixtures.
plazma nanopremaze.
Point 2(b) shall not apply to fire-fighting foam mixtures which were:
4. srpnja 2032. na medicinske proizvode osim medicinskih proizvoda za ugradnju obuhvaćenih područjem primjene Direktive 93/42/EEZ.
placed on the market before 4 July 2020; or
Točke 1. i 2. ne primjenjuju se na sljedeće:
produced in accordance with point 4(e), provided that, where they are used for training purposes, emissions to the environment are minimised and effluents collected are safely disposed of.
perfluorooktan sulfonsku kiselinu i njezine derivate navedene u dijelu A Priloga I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 850/2004;
Point 2(c) shall not apply to:
proizvodnju tvari koja nastaje kao neizbježan nusproizvod proizvodnje fluoriranih kemikalija s ugljikovim lancem dužine od najviše šest atoma;
articles placed on the market before 4 July 2020;
tvar koja će se upotrijebiti ili se upotrebljava kao prevezeni izolirani intermedijer ako su ispunjeni uvjeti iz članka 18. stavka 4. točaka od (a) do (f) ove Uredbe;
implantable medical devices produced in accordance with point 4(d)(i);
tvar, sastavni dio druge tvari ili smjesu koja će se upotrijebiti ili se upotrebljava:
articles coated with the photographic coatings referred to in point 4(d)(ii);
i. u proizvodnji medicinskih proizvoda za ugradnju obuhvaćenih područjem primjene Direktive 93/42/EEZ;
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 118 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 118. prvi stavak,
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [2] has been substantially amended several times [3].
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br.
In the interests of clarity and rationality, that Regulation should be codified.
207/2009 [2] znatno je izmijenjena nekoliko puta [3].
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [4], which was codified in 2009 as Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, created a system of trade mark protection specific to the Union which provided for the protection of trade marks at the level of the Union, in parallel to the protection of trade marks available at the level of the Member States in accordance with the national trade mark systems, harmonised by Council Directive 89/104/EEC [5], which was codified as Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
Radi jasnoće i racionalnosti tu bi Uredbu trebalo kodificirati.
It is desirable to promote throughout the Union a harmonious development of economic activities and a continuous and balanced expansion by completing an internal market which functions properly and offers conditions which are similar to those obtaining in a national market.
Uredbom Vijeća (EZ) br. 40/94 [4], koja je kodificirana 2009. kao Uredba (EZ) br. 207/2009, stvoren je sustav zaštite žiga specifičan za Uniju koji je omogućio zaštitu žigova na razini Unije usporedno sa zaštitom žigova dostupnom na razini država članica u skladu s nacionalnim sustavima žigova usklađenima Direktivom Vijeća 89/104/EEZ [5], koja je kodificirana kao Direktiva 2008/95/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [6].
In order to establish a market of this kind and make it increasingly a single market, not only should barriers to free movement of goods and services be removed and arrangements be instituted which ensure that competition is not distorted, but, in addition, legal conditions should be laid down which enable undertakings to adapt their activities to the scale of the Union, whether in manufacturing and distributing goods or in providing services.
U cijeloj je Uniji poželjno promicati skladan razvoj gospodarskih djelatnosti te neprekinuto i uravnoteženo širenje stvaranjem unutarnjeg tržišta koje funkcionira pravilno i nudi uvjete slične onima koji prevladavaju na nacionalnom tržištu.
For those purposes, trade marks enabling the products and services of undertakings to be distinguished by identical means throughout the entire Union, regardless of frontiers, should feature amongst the legal instruments which undertakings have at their disposal.
Za stvaranje tržišta takve vrste i njegovu sve veću transformaciju u jedinstveno tržište nije potrebno samo ukloniti prepreke slobodnom kretanju robe i usluga i uvesti pravila koja osiguravaju nenarušavanje tržišnog natjecanja, već bi trebalo stvoriti i pravne preduvjete koji će poduzećima omogućiti svoje aktivnosti prilagoditi mjerilima Unije, bilo u proizvodnji i distribuciji robe bilo u pružanju usluga.
For the purpose of pursuing the Union's said objectives it would appear necessary to provide for Union arrangements for trade marks whereby undertakings can by means of one procedural system obtain EU trade marks to which uniform protection is given and which produce their effects throughout the entire area of the Union.
U tom smislu, među pravnim instrumentima koji bi trebali biti na raspolaganju tim poduzećima posebno se ističu žigovi koji bi omogućavali obilježavanje proizvoda i usluga poduzeća putem istovjetnih sredstava u cijeloj Uniji, neovisno o granicama.
The principle of the unitary character of the EU trade mark thus stated should apply unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation.
Radi ostvarivanja spomenutih ciljeva Unije bilo bi potrebno predvidjeti mehanizme Unije s obzirom na žigove prema kojima bi poduzeća putem jedinstvenog postupka mogla stjecati žigove EU-a kojima je dana jedinstvena zaštita i koji proizvode učinke na području cijele Unije.
The barrier of territoriality of the rights conferred on proprietors of trade marks by the laws of the Member States cannot be removed by approximation of laws.
Trebalo bi primjenjivati tako navedeno načelo jedinstvenog karaktera žiga EU-a, osim ako je drukčije predviđeno ovom Uredbom.
In order to open up unrestricted economic activity in the whole of the internal market for the benefit of undertakings, it should be possible to register trade marks which are governed by a uniform Union law directly applicable in all Member States.
Prepreka teritorijalnosti prava dodijeljenih nositeljima žigova zakonodavstvima država članica ne može se ukloniti usklađivanjem zakonodavstava.
The experience acquired since the establishment of the Community trade mark system has shown that undertakings from within the Union and from third countries have accepted the system which has become a successful and viable complement and alternative to the protection of trade marks at the level of the Member States.
Kako bi se otvorila neograničena gospodarska djelatnost na cijelome zajedničkom tržištu u korist poduzeća, potrebno je omogućiti registraciju žigova uređenih jedinstvenim pravom Unije izravno primjenjivima u svim državama članicama.
The Union law relating to trade marks nevertheless does not replace the laws of the Member States on trade marks.
Iskustvo stečeno od uspostavljanja sustava žiga Zajednice pokazalo je da su poduzeća s područja Unije i iz trećih zemalja prihvatila taj sustav, koji je postao uspješna i održiva dopuna i alternativa zaštiti žigova na razini država članica.
It would not in fact appear to be justified to require undertakings to apply for registration of their trade marks as EU trade marks.
Pravo Unije u području žigova ipak ne zamjenjuje pravne propise država članica o žigovima.
National trade marks continue to be necessary for those undertakings which do not want protection of their trade marks at Union level, or which are unable to obtain Union-wide protection while national protection does not face any obstacles.
Zapravo se ne bi činilo opravdanim zahtijevati od poduzeća podnošenje prijave za registraciju svojih žigova kao žigova EU-a.
It should be left to each person seeking trade mark protection to decide whether the protection is sought only as a national trade mark in one or more Member States, or only as an EU trade mark, or both.
Nacionalni žigovi su i dalje potrebni onim poduzećima koja ne žele zaštitu svojih žigova na razini Unije ili koja ne mogu dobiti zaštitu diljem Unije dok pri nacionalnoj zaštiti nemaju prepreka.
The rights in an EU trade mark should not be obtained otherwise than by registration, and registration should be refused in particular if the trade mark is not distinctive, if it is unlawful or if it conflicts with earlier rights.
Svaka osoba koja traži zaštitu žiga trebala bi odlučiti traži li zaštitu samo nacionalnog žiga u jednoj državi članici ili više njih, samo žiga EU-a ili oboje.
A sign should be permitted to be represented in any appropriate form using generally available technology, and thus not necessarily by graphic means, as long as the representation is clear, precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective.
Prava u pogledu žiga EU-a trebala bi se stjecati samo registracijom, a registracija bi se trebala odbiti posebno ako žig nema razlikovni karakter, ako je nezakonit ili ako je u sukobu s ranijim pravima.
The protection afforded by an EU trade mark, the function of which is in particular to guarantee the trade mark as an indication of origin, should be absolute in the case of identity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Trebalo bi dopustiti prikaz znaka u bilo kojem prikladnom obliku upotrebom općenito dostupne tehnologije, što znači ne nužno grafički, sve dok je prikaz jasan, precizan, samostalan, lako dostupan, razumljiv, postojan i objektivan.
The protection should apply also in cases of similarity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Zaštita koju pruža žig EU-a, čija je svrha osobito jamčiti funkciju žiga kao oznake podrijetla, trebala bi biti apsolutna u slučaju istovjetnosti žiga i znaka, te proizvoda ili usluga.
An interpretation should be given for the concept of similarity in relation to the likelihood of confusion.
Zaštita bi se trebala primjenjujivati i u slučajevima sličnosti između žiga i znaka, te proizvoda ili usluga.
The likelihood of confusion, the appreciation of which depends on numerous elements and, in particular, on the recognition of the trade mark on the market, the association which can be made with the used or registered sign, the degree of similarity between the trade mark and the sign and between the goods or services identified, should constitute the specific condition for such protection.
Trebalo bi dati tumačenje pojma sličnosti u odnosu na vjerojatnost zabune.
In order to ensure legal certainty and full consistency with the principle of priority, under which a registered earlier trade mark takes precedence over later registered trade marks, it is necessary to provide that the enforcement of rights conferred by an EU trade mark should be without prejudice to the rights of proprietors acquired prior to the filing or priority date of the EU trade mark.
Vjerojatnost zabune koja ovisi o brojnim elementima i to osobito o prepoznatljivosti žiga na tržištu, o dovođenju u vezu s upotrijebljenim ili registriranim znakom, o stupnju sličnosti između žiga i znaka, te između obilježenih proizvoda ili usluga, trebala bi biti posebna okolnost za takvu zaštitu.
This is in conformity with Article 16(1) of the Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights of 15 April 1994.
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost i potpuna sukladnost s načelom prvenstva prema kojem registrirani raniji žig ima prednost pred kasnije registriranim žigom, potrebno je predvidjeti da izvršavanje prava koja proizlaze iz žiga EU-a ne bi trebalo dovoditi u pitanje prava nositelja stečena prije podnošenja prijave ili prije datuma prvenstva žiga EU-a.
Confusion as to the commercial source from which the goods or services emanate may occur when a company uses the same or a similar sign as a trade name in such a way that a link is established between the company bearing the name and the goods or services coming from that company.
To je u skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 1.
Infringement of an EU trade mark should therefore also comprise the use of the sign as a trade name or similar designation as long as the use is made for the purposes of distinguishing goods or services.
Sporazuma o trgovinskim aspektima prava intelektualnog vlasništva od 15. travnja 1994.
In order to ensure legal certainty and full consistency with specific Union legislation, it is appropriate to provide that the proprietor of an EU trade mark should be entitled to prohibit a third party from using a sign in comparative advertising where such comparative advertising is contrary to Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Do zabune u vezi s komercijalnim izvorom iz kojeg potječu proizvodi ili usluge može doći kada trgovačko društvo rabi isti ili sličan znak kao trgovački naziv na takav način da uspostavlja vezu između trgovačkog društva koje nosi taj naziv i proizvoda ili usluga koji dolaze iz tog trgovačkog društva.
In order to ensure trade mark protection and combat counterfeiting effectively, and in line with international obligations of the Union under the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), in particular Article V of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) on freedom of transit and, as regards generic medicines, the ‘Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health’ adopted by the Doha WTO Ministerial Conference on 14 November 2001, the proprietor of an EU trade mark should be entitled to prevent third parties from bringing goods, in the course of trade, into the Union without being released for free circulation there, where such goods come from third countries and bear without authorisation a trade mark which is identical or essentially identical with the EU trade mark registered in respect of such goods.
Povreda žiga EU-a trebala bi stoga obuhvaćati i uporabu znaka kao trgovačkog naziva ili slične oznake sve dok ta uporaba ima za cilj razlikovanje proizvoda ili usluga.
To this effect, it should be permissible for EU trade mark proprietors to prevent the entry of infringing goods and their placement in all customs situations, including transit, transhipment, warehousing, free zones, temporary storage, inward processing or temporary admission, also when such goods are not intended to be placed on the market of the Union.
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost i potpuna podudarnost s posebnim zakonodavstvom Unije, primjereno je osigurati da nositelj žiga EU-a ima pravo zabraniti trećoj strani uporabu znaka u komparativnom oglašavanju ako je takvo komparativno oglašavanje u suprotnosti s Direktivom 2006/114/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [7].
In performing customs controls, the customs authorities should make use of the powers and procedures laid down in Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council [8], also at the request of the right holders.
Kako bi se osigurala zaštita žiga i učinkovitije suzbijanje krivotvorenja te u skladu s međunarodnim obvezama Unije u okviru Svjetske trgovinske organizacije (WTO), posebno u skladu s člankom V. Općeg sporazuma o carinama i trgovini (GATT) o slobodi provoza i, u pogledu generičkih lijekova, „Deklaracijom o Sporazumu TRIPS i javnom zdravlju” usvojenom na ministarskoj konferenciji WTO-a u Dohi 14. studenoga 2001., nositelj žiga EU-a trebao bi imati pravo spriječiti treće strane da u trgovačkom prometu u Uniju unose proizvode koji se na njenom području ne puštaju u slobodan promet, ako takvi proizvodi dolaze iz trećih zemalja i bez odobrenja nose žig koji je istovjetan ili gotovo istovjetan žigu EU-a registriranom za te proizvode.
In particular, the customs authorities should carry out the relevant controls on the basis of risk analysis criteria.
U tu bi svrhu nositeljima žigova EU-a trebalo biti dopušteno spriječiti ulazak krivotvorenih proizvoda i njihova plasiranja u svim carinskim situacijama, uključujući provoz, pretovar, skladištenje, slobodne zone, privremeni smještaj, unutarnju proizvodnju ili privremeni uvoz, također kada takvi proizvodi nisu namijenjeni za stavljanje na tržište Unije.
In order to reconcile the need to ensure the effective enforcement of trade mark rights with the necessity to avoid hampering the free flow of trade in legitimate goods, the entitlement of the proprietor of the EU trade mark should lapse where, during the subsequent proceedings initiated before the European Union trade mark court (‘EU trade mark court’) competent to take a substantive decision on whether the EU trade mark has been infringed, the declarant or the holder of the goods is able to prove that the proprietor of the EU trade mark is not entitled to prohibit the placing of the goods on the market in the country of final destination.
Pri obavljanju carinskih kontrola, carinska tijela trebala bi iskoristiti ovlasti i postupke utvrđene u Uredbi (EU) br. 608/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [8], također na zahtjev nositelja prava.
Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 provides that a right holder is to be liable for damages towards the holder of the goods where, inter alia, the goods in question are subsequently found not to infringe an intellectual property right.
Posebno bi carinska tijela trebala provoditi relevantne kontrole na temelju kriterijâ analize rizika.
Appropriate measures should be taken with a view to ensuring the smooth transit of generic medicines.
Kako bi se uskladila potreba za osiguravanjem učinkovitog izvršavanja prava koja se odnose na žig s potrebom izbjegavanja otežavanja slobodnog odvijanja trgovine zakonitim proizvodima, pravo nositelja žiga EU-a trebalo bi isteći kada tijekom posljedičnih postupaka pokrenutih pred sudom za žigove Europske unije („sud za žigove EU-a”), nadležnom za donošenje meritorne odluke o tome je li došlo do povrede žiga EU-a, deklarant ili držatelj proizvodâ može dokazati da nositelj žiga EU-a nema pravo zabraniti plasman tih proizvoda na tržište zemlje krajnjeg odredišta.
With respect to international non-proprietary names (INN) as globally recognised generic names for active substances in pharmaceutical preparations, it is vital to take due account of the existing limitations on the effect of EU trade mark rights.
Člankom 28.
Consequently, the proprietor of an EU trade mark should not have the right to prevent a third party from bringing goods into the Union without being released for free circulation there, based upon similarities between the INN for the active ingredient in the medicines and the trade mark.
Uredbe (EU) br. 608/2013 utvrđuje se da je nositelj prava odgovoran za naknadu štete držatelju proizvoda u slučaju da se, među ostalim, za proizvode naknadno utvrdi da njima nije došlo do povrede prava intelektualnog vlasništva.
In order to enable proprietors of EU trade marks to combat counterfeiting effectively, they should be entitled to prohibit the affixing of an infringing mark to goods and preparatory acts carried out prior to the affixing.
Trebalo bi poduzeti odgovarajuće mjere za osiguravanje neometanog provoza generičkih lijekova.
The exclusive rights conferred by an EU trade mark should not entitle the proprietor to prohibit the use of signs or indications by third parties which are used fairly and thus in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
U pogledu međunarodnih nezaštićenih naziva (INN) kao svjetski prepoznatljivih generičkih naziva za aktivne tvari u farmaceutskim pripravcima, od ključne je važnosti uzeti u obzir postojeća ograničenja na učinak pravâ žiga EU-a.
In order to ensure equal conditions for trade names and EU trade marks in the event of conflicts, given that trade names are regularly granted unrestricted protection against later trade marks, such use should be only considered to include the use of the personal name of the third party.
Stoga nositelj žiga EU-a ne bi trebao imati pravo spriječiti treću stranu da u Uniju unosi proizvode koji na tom području nisu pušteni u slobodan promet, na temelju sličnosti između međunarodnoga nezaštićenog naziva (INN) za aktivni sastojak u lijekovima i žiga.
It should further permit the use of descriptive or non-distinctive signs or indications in general.
Kako bi se nositeljima žiga EU-a omogućila učinkovitija borba protiv krivotvorenja, trebali bi imati pravo na zabranu isticanja na proizvodima znaka kojim se povređuje pravo te pripremnih radnji koje prethode tom isticanju.