natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Submission of the full proposal
Ostali podaci navode se u zahtjevu i smjernicama za ocjenjivanje, koje se objavljuju zajedno s povezanim pozivom na podnošenje ponuda.
Applicants submit a full proposal.
U okviru ovog Višegodišnjeg programa rada i Uredbe o programu LIFE odabir projekata može biti podložan prilagodbi i usklađivanju u svakom godišnjem pozivu na podnošenje prijedloga.
Proposals will be evaluated against the eligibility and award criteria and ranked as described under 5.1.1.2.
Prijedlozi podnositelja zahtjeva koji moraju biti isključeni ili ne ispunjavaju opće kriterije prihvatljivosti u skladu s člankom 131.
Eligibility and award criteria
Financijske uredbe neće se uzeti u obzir.
The eligibility criteria (a) will be applied to the concept note, in the case of the two-stage approach, and to the full proposals, in the case of the one-stage approach.
Nadalje, prijedlozi moraju ispunjavati kriterije za podnošenje (npr. za neke prijedloge zahtjevi se dostavljaju samo digitalnim putem) i kriterije prihvatljivosti (npr. usklađenost sa Smjernicama o prihvatljivosti izraelskih tijela i njihovih aktivnosti na državnim područjima pod izraelskom okupacijom od lipnja 1967. za bespovratna sredstva, nagrade i financijske instrumente koje EU financira od 2014. nadalje) koji se primjenjuju na sva bespovratna sredstva za aktivnosti programa LIFE, što će biti izričito navedeno u povezanim smjernicama za zahtjeve.
The award criteria (b) will be applied as described under 5.1.1.1 above:
Kriteriji prihvatljivosti koji se primjenjuju na različite vrste projekata navedeni su pod odgovarajućim naslovom.
Eligibility criteria
Kriteriji koji se na isti način primjenjuju na različite projekte navedeni su u odjeljku 5.1.1.
Both a concept note and full proposal for a project within the meaning of Article 18(a), (b), (c), or (h) of the LIFE Regulation will not be retained for an evaluation of its merit, if the project proposal does not demonstrate that the project:
(Projekti u skladu s člankom 18. točkama (a), (b), (c) i (h) Uredbe o programu LIFE).
contributes to one or several of the general objectives set out in Article 3 of the LIFE Regulation and of the applicable specific objectives in Articles 10, 11, 12 and 14, 15 and 16 of the LIFE Regulation,
U skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 2.
falls within the scope of the priority area of the LIFE sub-programme as set out in Articles 9 and 13 of the LIFE Regulation under which the project proposal was submitted, and
Uredbe o programu LIFE, pravne osobe sa sjedištem izvan Unije mogu sudjelovati u projektima navedenima u članku 18.
corresponds to one of the following project types as defined in Article 2 (a), (b), (c) and (h) of the LIFE Regulation:
Uredbe o programu LIFE pod uvjetom da korisnik koji koordinira projekt ima sjedište u Uniji te da aktivnost koja se treba provoditi izvan Unije zadovoljava uvjete iz članka 6. stavka 1.
‘Pilot projects’ are projects that apply a technique or method that has not been applied or tested before, or elsewhere, that offer potential environmental or climate advantages compared to current best practice and that can subsequently be applied on a larger scale to similar situations.
Uredbe o programu LIFE.
‘Demonstration projects’ are projects that, put into practice, test, evaluate and disseminate actions, methodologies or approaches that are new or unknown in the specific context of the project, such as the geographical, ecological, socioeconomic context, and that could be applied elsewhere in similar circumstances.
Stoga te aktivnosti moraju biti nužne za postizanje okolišnih i klimatskih ciljeva Unije i za osiguravanje učinkovitosti aktivnosti projekta („intervencije”) koji se provode na državnim područjima država članica na koje se primjenjuju Ugovori.
‘Best practice projects’ are projects that apply appropriate, cost-effective and state-of-the-art techniques, methods and approaches taking into account the specific context of the project.
U skladu s člankom 7.
‘Information, awareness and dissemination projects’ are projects aimed at supporting communication, dissemination of information and awareness raising in the fields of the sub-programme for Environment or Climate Action.
Uredbe o programu LIFE, tijekom provedbe programa LIFE suradnja s relevantnim međunarodnim organizacijama i s njihovim institucijama i tijelima moguća je kada je potrebna za postizanje općih ciljeva iz članka 3. te Uredbe.
Pilot and demonstration projects under the priority area Environment and Resource Efficiency, and pilot, demonstration and best practice projects under the priority areas Climate Change Mitigation and Climate Change Adaptation, must contain actions that lead to substantial and measurable direct effects on the environmental and/or climate action issue(s) targeted.
Osim toga, prijedlozi će biti odabrani ako, na temelju posebne popratne dokumentacije u vezi s poslovnim rezultatima podnositelja zahtjeva tijekom prethodnih godina, oni mogu dokazati
Pilot, demonstration and best practice projects under the priority area Nature and Biodiversity, must dedicate at least 25 % of the eligible budget to concrete conservation actions (limited exceptions will be possible in view of the specific policy needs and will be explicitly identified in the application guidelines).
operativnu sposobnost – podnositelj zahtjeva mora posjedovati stručnu sposobnost i kvalifikacije potrebne za dovršetak projekta i
Concrete conservation actions are those that have substantial and measurable direct effects on the environmental and climate issue(s) targeted, in this case leading to the improvement or the slowing/halting/reversion of the decline of the conservation status or ecological condition of the species, habitats, ecosystems or ecosystem services targeted (for more details refer to the application guidelines).
financijsku sposobnost – podnositelj zahtjeva mora imati stabilne i dostatne izvore financiranja za održavanje svoje aktivnosti za vrijeme trajanja projekta i za sudjelovanje u financiranju projekta.
Pilot, demonstration, best practice or information, awareness and dissemination projects under the priority areas Environmental or Climate Action Governance and Information must contain actions that lead to substantial and measurable direct or indirect effects on the environmental and/or climate action issue(s) targeted by causing substantial and measurable direct effects on the environmental and/or climate related governance, information, and/or awareness and dissemination issue(s) targeted.
Članak 131.
The targeted environmental, climate action and/or related governance and information effects should already be measurable and measured or modelled on the basis of measurements during the project period.
Financijske uredbe primjenjuje se na odabir javnih tijela i međunarodnih organizacija u odnosu na njihovu financijsku sposobnost.
As a measure to avoid overlap with other EU programmes, projects focused on research or dedicated to the construction of large infrastructure do not fall within the scope of the LIFE programme and are therefore not eligible.
Projekti u skladu s člankom 18. točkama (a), (b), (c) i (h) Uredbe o programu LIFE
LIFE projects shall not serve to fund compensation measures deriving from obligations under national or EU law.
Odabir pilot-projekata, demonstracijskih projekata, projekata najbolje prakse i projekata informiranja, podizanja svijesti i širenja informacija u smislu članka 18. točaka (a), (b), (c) i (h) Uredbe o programu LIFE temelji se na istoj tehničkoj metodologiji za odabir projekata i na njih se primjenjuju slični kriteriji prihvatljivosti i dodjele, kako je navedeno u nastavku.
Award criteria
Tehnička metodologija za postupak podnošenja i odabira
The award criteria apply to all priority areas, unless specified otherwise.
Na temelju prijedloga iz ocjene u sredini provedbenog razdoblja i pozitivnog iskustva s pristupima u dvije faze u provedbi nekih drugih programa EU-a, ovim Višegodišnjim programom rada za program LIFE uvodi se pristup u dvije faze u onim prioritetnim područjima u kojima je dosad moguće podnositelje zahtjeva čije projektne ideje imaju visoku dodanu vrijednost EU-a i koji nemaju iskustva s programom LIFE čini se obeshrabrivala količina podataka koji su potrebni za ocjenjivanje konačnog prijedloga projekta zbog relativno male vjerojatnosti uspjeha.
Projects only compete with each other within the same Priority Area.
U okviru pristupa u dvije faze konačni prijedlog morat će podnijeti samo podnositelji za čije prijedloge postoji velika vjerojatnost da će biti odabrani (vidjeti 5.1.1.2. (b)).
Particular award criteria for concept notes
Stoga su u okviru trenutačnog programa LIFE predviđena dva postupka:
All concept notes in stage 1 of the two-stage approach have to obtain at least a passing score for the following award criteria, in order to be considered for ranking:
pristup u dvije faze koji se temelji na opisu projekta nakon kojeg slijedi konačni prijedlog,
Overall quality of the proposal: this criterion will focus on the clarity of the proposals (including the description of the pre-operational context), its feasibility and the indicative value for money.
pristup od jedne faze utemeljen samo na konačnom prijedlogu.
Max points 20 (with a passing minimum score of 5).
Pristup će odabrati Izvršna agencija u dogovoru s Komisijom (Glavnom upravom za okoliš i Glavnom upravom za klimatsku politiku) vodeći računa o organizacijskim i operativnim ograničenjima svakog poziva na podnošenje prijedloga.
Overall EU added value: this criterion will focus on the project contribution to the LIFE priorities, its expected impact, and the sustainability of the project results.
Za poziv za 2018. za potprogram za okoliš upotrijebit će se pristup u dvije faze.
Max points 30 (with a passing minimum of 10).
Na temelju povratnih informacija korisnika pristup se tijekom sljedećih godina može proširiti na potprogram za klimatske aktivnosti.
Award criteria for full proposals
Ocjenjivanje konačnih prijedloga u pristupu od jedne faze opisano je u odjeljcima 5.1.1.2. i 5.1.1.3.
For both, the two-stage and the one-stage approaches, full proposals will be evaluated and scored on their merit according to the following award criteria and scoring system:
Pristup u dvije faze organizira se kako slijedi:
Technical coherence and quality
Pristup u dvije faze
Technical coherence means that the project actions proposed should be appropriate and feasible measures for achieving the forecast project outputs and outcomes.
Prva faza:
Neither the actions nor the foreseen outputs and outcomes should contradict any of the objectives pursued by the LIFE programme.
Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga
Technical quality means the project actions should aim at maximising their effectiveness and efficiency in relation to the outputs and outcomes pursued.
Podnošenje opisa projekta
The project actions should be well planned and clearly described.
Podnositelj podnosi opis projekta od najviše 10 stranica koji sadržava sljedeće:
Financial coherence and quality
administrativne obrasce o korisnicima koji sudjeluju u projektu,
The financial contributions of the beneficiaries and co-funders, the proposed budget and its consistency with the actions proposed and with the applicable rules as well as the cost-effectiveness and value-for-money of the proposed approach will be evaluated under this criterion as regards the expected outcomes of the actions considered sufficiently technically coherent and of acceptable technical quality.
pregled sadržaja projekta, uključujući opis glavnog predmeta ekološkog projekta, predviđenog partnerstva, ograničenja koja bi mogla nastati i plan za nepredviđene situacije i njihovo uklanjanje te odabranu strategiju za osiguravanje održivosti rezultata projekta nakon završetka njegove provedbe i
The budget must be transparent, i.e. the cost items should be sufficiently described.
proračun projekta na razini kategorija troškova;
EU added value: extent and quality of the contribution to the specific objectives of the priority areas of the two LIFE sub-programmes
Ocjenjivanje i rangiranje opisa projekta
The extent to which each proposal, in as far as it is considered technically and financially sufficiently coherent and of acceptable quality, is expected to contributes to one or several of the specific objectives of the priority areas of the two LIFE sub-programmes as set out in Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the LIFE Regulation (for the LIFE Environment sub-programme) and Articles 14, 15 and 16 (for the LIFE Climate Action sub-programme) and the quality of this contribution will be evaluated.
Kriteriji prihvatljivosti opisa projekta
The assessment of this criterion covers, in particular, the extent and quality of the contribution to the specific objectives targeted (impact); the magnitude of the environmental and/or climate effects expected due to the project actions at the end of the project, in comparison to the state-of-play estimated or measured at the outset of the project.
Na temelju opisa projekta Izvršna agencija utvrđuje prijedloge koji zadovoljavaju kriterije prihvatljivosti (vidjeti odjeljak 5.1.1.2. (a)).
It will also take into account the relevance of the territorial, social and policy contexts, which the project actions are expected to influence.
Kriteriji za dodjelu u pogledu opisa projekta
The expected effects should be expressed having in mind the applicable project level indicators and measuring units, which the projects will have to report on in the LIFE key project-level indicator (KPI) data base created for this purpose.
Prijedlozi se rangiraju prema vrijednosti, odnosno bodovima dobivenima na temelju kriterija za dodjelu „Ukupna kvaliteta prijedloga” i „Ukupna dodana vrijednost EU-a”.
Thus, e.g. LIFE Nature and Biodiversity proposals will be assessed based on their expected effects on the structures and functions of the habitats and the status of the species and/or the ecological status of ecosystems and the condition of their services.
Prijedlozi koji ne ostvare minimalni broj bodova za jedan ili oba kriterija isključuju se.
This assessment only takes into account the actions considered feasible on the basis of the evaluation of the technical and financial coherence.
U slučaju prijedloga s jednakim brojem bodova za kriterij za dodjelu „Ukupna kvaliteta prijedloga” prednost se daje onima koji imaju više bodova za kriterij „Ukupna dodana vrijednost EU-a”.
EU added value: sustainability (continuation, replication, transfer potential)
U slučaju prijedloga s jednakim brojem bodova za oba kriterija o konačnom rangiranju odlučuje odbor za ocjenjivanje.
The sustainability of the project results in the medium and long term is the capacity to maintain them after its implementation, be it by continuation, by replication or by transfer.
Popis projekata koji se uzimaju u obzir
Continuation means the continued use, after the end of the project period, of the solutions implemented in the project limited to the entities involved in the project, but may be further spread geographically.
Na dugačkom popisu opisa projekata za koje se traži podnošenje konačnog prijedloga nalazit će se najbolje ocijenjeni prijedlozi za koje zbroj traženih doprinosa EU-a čini 2 do 2,5 puta raspoloživih sredstava.
Mere continuation and maintenance of project results will be sufficient for a passing score, while further geographical spread will be judged on its expected scope, which makes it comparable to replication or transfer.
Izvršna agencija utvrdit će faktor na temelju rezultata postupka rangiranja uzimajući u obzir veličinu prijedloga i stečeno iskustvo u provedbi pristupa u dvije faze.
Replication means, the solutions applied in the project are used again in the same way and for the same purposes by other entities/sectors during or after the project end.
Dugačak popis uključivat će zasebne popise za svako prioritetno područje.
Transfer means that solutions applied in the project are used in a different way or for a different environment, climate action or related governance and information purpose by the same or other entities/sectors during or after the project end.
Ako potražnja u okviru jednog prioritetnog područja nije dovoljna, mogu se proširiti popisi za druga prioritetna područja.
Applicants should demonstrate in their proposals that the solutions (i.e. techniques, methods, methodologies, approaches, and/or actions or support activities for communication, dissemination of information and awareness-raising) aiming at direct and/or indirect positive effects with regard to the related objectives of the LIFE Regulation have the potential to be continued, replicated and/or transferred.
Druga faza:
Successful continuation, replication and/or transfer require a strategy including tasks to multiply the impacts of the projects' solutions and mobilise a wider uptake, reaching a critical mass during the project and/or in a short- and medium-term perspective after the end of the LIFE project.
Podnošenje konačnog prijedloga:
This goes beyond transfer of knowledge and networking, and involves putting the solutions developed and/or applied in the project into practice beyond the project period, elsewhere or for a different purpose.
Od podnositelja prihvatljivih opisa projekata koji su rangirani kao prijedlozi koji bi se mogli razmatrati za financiranje traži se da podnesu konačni prijedlog.
Applicants have to provide a clear and credible description of the strategy and measures foreseen to ensure this, including an explanation regarding the following:
Dopuštena je ograničena fleksibilnost između opisa projekta i konačnog prijedloga u pogledu aktivnosti, partnerstva i proračuna.
how the solutions can be expected to be sustained on project level after the project end, including the related, long-term social and economic effects that would result,
Međutim, ta fleksibilnost ne može dovesti do promjene prirode prijedloga opisa projekta.
in how far further public support, i.a. in the form of loans through innovative financial instruments, would be necessary or useful for scaling-up, replicating, or transferring the solutions, and
Proračun može odstupati od proračuna u opisu projekta za najviše 10 %.
in particular for projects with commercial actors and actors along value chains, in how far it is expected to achieve or maintain ‘financial maturity’ (‘investment readiness’/‘bankability’) for these solutions during the project period.
Ocjenjivanje i rangiranje konačnog prijedloga
EU added value: synergies and transnationality
Prijedlozi se ocjenjuju i rangiraju na temelju kriterija prihvatljivosti i dodjele kako je opisano u odjeljku 5.1.1.2.
Synergies (including multi-purpose, integration/complementarity, green public procurement, ecolabel, and uptake of EU-funded research results):
Priprema konačnog popisa projekata koji će se financirati i rezervnog popisa
Synergies can be reached by multi-purpose approaches and integration in and/or complementarity with other EU policies and funding mechanisms.
Nakon faze preispitivanja predlažu se uspješni projekti za financiranje u okviru dostupnih proračunskih sredstava.
Proposals will receive bonus points for synergies, depending on their extent and quality.
Rezervni popis sastavlja se od najbolje rangiranih projekata koji se ne mogu financirati zbog dostupnih proračunskih sredstava.
A multipurpose delivery mechanism means that the proposal not only plans to achieve the project's specific main environmental and/or climate action objectives, but, at the same time, aims at achieving other purposes (e.g. aiming at an improved waste management and social integration).
Rezervni popis obuhvaća dodatnih 20 % dostupnih proračunskih sredstava za program LIFE.
Also strategies to achieve social and economic sustainability alongside the ecological and/or climate action dimension of sustainability are encompassed by this concept (e.g. in the circular economy, along the value chain different actors achieve the prolongation of product cycles and integrate long-term unemployed in the job market).
Potpisivanje ugovora o dodjeli bespovratnih sredstava
Project proposals that, while focussing on a specific environmental or climate action issue, improve integration of these specific environmental or climate action objectives in other policy areas and/or achieve complementarity with these, and thus create synergies with the objectives of other Union policies will be favourably assessed.
Pristup od jedne faze
Up to eight additional points can be given for multi-purpose mechanisms, integration or complementarity or a combination of any of these.
Podnošenje konačnog prijedloga
Synergies can also be reached through green public procurement and the use of eco-labelling scheme as regards the integration of green production and service provision goals, and the uptake of research results under Horizon 2020 or its predecessor programmes.
Podnositelji prijedloga podnose konačni prijedlog.
Thus the commitment to apply green public procurement and/or, the preference of products and/or services of officially recognised eco-labelling schemes such as the EU Ecolabel through a clear delivery mechanism merit one bonus point, each.
Prijedlozi se ocjenjuju na temelju kriterija prihvatljivosti i dodjele kako je opisano u odjeljku 5.1.1.2.
Also the uptake of the results of environmental and climate-related research and innovation projects financed by Horizon 2020 or by preceding Framework Programmes will lead to an additional bonus point, if there is sufficient evidence for the added value of this uptake for the project.
Kriteriji prihvatljivosti i dodjele
Transnationality
U slučaju pristupa u dvije faze kriteriji prihvatljivosti (a) primjenjuju se na opis projekta, a kada je riječ o pristupu od jedne faze, primjenjuju se na konačni prijedlog.
Proposals shall be favoured, if transnational cooperation among Member States is essential to guarantee the achievement of the project's objectives.
Kriteriji za dodjelu (b) primjenjuju se kako je opisano u prethodnom odjeljku 5.1.1.1.:
On the basis of this criterion, up to four additional points may be given to a proposal, if there is sufficient evidence for an added value of the transnational approach.
Kriteriji prihvatljivosti
Specific criteria and scoring system for projects under the sub-programme for Environment
Vrijednost opisa i prijedloga projekta u smislu članka 18. točaka (a), (b), (c), ili (h) Uredbe o programu LIFE ne ocjenjuje se ako se prijedlogom projekta ne može pokazati da projekt:
The specific criteria and scoring system under the sub-programme Environment reflect the fact that only under the sub-programme Environment thematic priorities (Annex III to the LIFE Regulation) and the thus related project topics (Heading 3 above) are defined.
pridonosi ostvarenju jednog ili nekoliko općih ciljeva iz članka 3.
EU added value: contribution to the project topics
Uredbe o programu LIFE i prihvatljivih posebnih ciljeva iz članaka 10., 11., 12. i 14., 15. i 16.
LIFE proposals clearly falling under the project topics implementing the thematic priorities set out in Annex III for the sub-programme Environment as defined in the multiannual work programme will receive additional points under this criterion.
Uredbe o programu LIFE,
Project proposals under the priority area Environment and Resource Efficiency will receive 5 points, if they fully comply with one of the project topics listed in Section 3 under this priority area.
nalazi se u okviru opsega prioritetnog područja potprograma programa LIFE kako je navedeno u člancima 9. i 13.
If, in addition, the solution(s) (i.e. techniques, methods, actions, methodologies, or approaches within the meaning of Article 2 of the LIFE Regulation) to the environmental issue targeted is (are) new or unknown in the European Union, the project will receive a further 5 points.
Uredbe o programu LIFE u okviru koje je dostavljen prijedlog projekta i
Project proposals under the priority area Nature and Biodiversity and under the priority area Environmental Governance and information will receive 10 points, if they fully comply with one of the project topics under this priority area.
odgovara jednoj od sljedećih vrsta projekata u skladu s definicijom iz članka 2. točaka (a), (b), (c) i (h) Uredbe o programu LIFE: