natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such expansion should take place without delay taking into account the risk of further spreading of the specified organism in the rest of the Union territory which has increased with the start of the flight season of the insect vectors in early spring.
S obzirom na to, potrebno je umjesto uvođenja mjera iskorjenjivanja u određenim dijelovima predmetnog područja proširiti demarkirano područje radi sprečavanja širenja.
The infected zone should therefore be extended to cover those municipalities of the provinces of Brindisi and Taranto where outbreaks of the specified organism have been detected.
Takvo proširenje trebalo bi se provesti odmah vodeći računa o riziku od daljnjeg širenja navedenog organizma u ostatku područja Unije koji se povećao s početkom sezone letenja insekata vektora u rano proljeće.
It should also cover the part of the province of Bari where it is likely that that organism has already spread and is established.
Zaraženo područje stoga bi trebalo proširiti tako da obuhvaća općine pokrajina Brindisi i Taranto u kojima je otkrivena pojava navedenog organizma.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food, and Feed,
Također bi trebalo obuhvatiti dio pokrajine Bari u kojem postoji vjerojatnost da se taj organizam već proširio i nastanio.
Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 is amended as follows:
Članak 1.
the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) is deleted;
Provedbena odluka (EU) 2015/789 mijenja se kako slijedi:
Part A of Annex II is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Treći podstavak članka 4. stavka 2. briše se;
Article 2
Dio A Priloga II. mijenja se kako je navedeno u Prilogu ovoj Odluci.
Done at Brussels, 27 June 2018.
Ova je Odluka upućena državama članicama.
For the Commission
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 27. lipnja 2018.
OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.
Član Komisije
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.)
SL L 169, 10.7.2000., str. 1.
(OJ L 125, 21.5.2015, p. 36).
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2015/789 od 18. svibnja 2015. o mjerama za sprečavanje unošenja u Uniju organizma Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) i njegova širenja unutar Unije (SL L 125, 21.5.2015., str. 36.).
Part A of Annex II to Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 is replaced by the following:
Dio A Priloga II.
‘PART A
Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2015/789 zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Infected zone in Italy
„DIO A
The infected zone of Italy includes the following areas:
Zaraženo područje u Italiji
The province of Lecce
Zaraženo područje u Italiji uključuje sljedeća područja:
The province of Brindisi
pokrajinu Lecce
Municipalities located in the province of Taranto:
pokrajinu Brindisi
Municipality located in the province of Bari:
općine u pokrajini Taranto:
of 28 June 2018
оd 28. lipnja 2018.
terminating the re-opening of the investigation concerning the judgments in joined cases C-186/14 P and C-193/14 P in relation to Council Regulation (EC) No 926/2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o prekidu ponovnog pokretanja ispitnog postupka koji se odnosi na presude u spojenim predmetima C-186/14 P i C-193/14 P u pogledu Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 926/2009 o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz određenih bešavnih cijevi od željeza ili čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2272 o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenog željeznog ili čeličnog pribora za cijevi podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 266 thereof,
EUROPSKA KOMISIJA,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’),
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 266.,
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije („Osnovna uredba”),
A. MEASURES IN FORCE AND COURT PROCEEDINGS
budući da:
Definitive measures
A. MJERE NA SNAZI I SUDSKI POSTUPCI
On 6 October 2009, following an anti-dumping investigation in accordance with Article 5 of the basic Regulation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron and steel (‘SPT’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘China’ or ‘the PRC’), by Council Regulation (EC) No 926/2009 (the ‘original measures’ or ‘original Regulation’).
Konačne mjere
The measures took the form of the following ad valorem duty rates: 17,7 % (Shandong Luxing Steel Pipe Co. Ltd), 27,2 % (for other cooperating companies), and 39,2 % (all other companies).
Vijeće je 6. listopada 2009. nakon antidampinškog ispitnog postupka u skladu s člankom 5.
On 8 December 2015, following an expiry review investigation in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 (‘the expiry review Regulation’), the Commission imposed definitive anti-dumping measures for a further five years on the basis of the existence of a likelihood of a recurrence of a threat of injury.
Osnovne uredbe („početni ispitni postupak”) Uredbom (EZ) br. 926/2009 („izvorne mjere” ili „Izvorna uredba”). uvelo konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz određenih bešavnih cijevi od željeza ili čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („Kina” ili „NRK”).
Judgments of the General Court and the Court of Justice
Mjere su bile u obliku sljedećih stopi pristojbi ad valorem: 17,7 % (Shandong Luxing Steel Pipe Co. Ltd.), 27,2 % (ostala društva koja surađuju) i 39,2 % (sva ostala društva).
The original measures were based on a finding of a threat of injury and were annulled by a judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2014 in case T-528/09, insofar as it concerned the exporting producer Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd (‘Hubei’).
Komisija je 8. prosinca 2015. nakon ispitnog postupka revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
By judgment of 7 April 2016 in joined cases C-186/14 P and C-193/14 P, the Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) upheld the findings of the General Court, insofar as they concerned Hubei (together with the judgment of the General Court hereafter collectively referred to as ‘the Hubei judgments’).
Osnovne uredbe Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2015/2272 („Uredba o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera”) uvela konačne antidampinške mjere za još pet godina na temelju postojanja vjerojatnosti ponavljanja prijetnje štete.
As a direct consequence of the Hubei judgments, imports into the Union of SPT originating in the PRC, as produced by Hubei, were deemed to have never been subject to anti-dumping measures.
Presude Općeg suda i Suda
Hence, the anti-dumping duties collected on these imports had to be reimbursed in accordance with the applicable customs legislation.
Izvorne mjere temeljile su se na nalazu o prijetnji štete i poništene su presudom Općeg suda od 29. siječnja 2014. u predmetu T-528/09, u dijelu u kojem se odnosi na izvoz proizvoda koje proizvodi Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd. („društvo Hubei”).
In June 2016, the Commission removed Hubei from the list of companies listed under the TARIC Additional Code A950 and listed it under a new TARIC Additional Code C129.
Presudom od 7. travnja 2016. u spojenim predmetima C-186/14 P i C-193/14 P Sud je potvrdio zaključke Općeg suda u dijelu u kojem se odnose na društvo Hubei (zajedno s presudom Općeg suda dalje u tekstu zajednički se nazivaju „presude Hubei”).
On 9 September 2016, the Commission published a notice concerning the judgments in joined cases C-186/14 P and C-193/14 P (the ‘Notice’), reopening the review investigation under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation that lead to the adoption of the expiry review Regulation.
Kao izravna posljedica tih presuda smatra se da uvoz u Uniju određenih bešavnih cijevi od željeza ili čelika podrijetlom iz NRK-a, koje proizvodi društvo Hubei, nikad nije podlijegao antidampinškim mjerama.
The re-opening was limited in scope to determining whether, in light of the Hubei judgments, it would be appropriate to repeal the expiry review Regulation for Chinese exporting producers other than Hubei.
Stoga je dosad naplaćene antidampinške pristojbe na taj uvoz trebalo nadoknaditi u skladu s primjenjivim carinskim propisima.
B. PROCEDURE
Komisija je u lipnju 2016. uklonila društvo Hubei s popisa trgovačkih društava pod dodatnom oznakom TARIC A950 i uvrstila ga pod novu dodatnu oznaku TARIC C129.
The Commission officially informed the Union industry represented by the Defence Committee of the Seamless Steel Tube Industry of the European Union (‘the Defence Committee’), the other known Union producers, the exporting producers in the PRC, importers/users which were known to be concerned, as well as the authorities of the PRC of the re-opening of the investigation.
Komisija je 9. rujna 2016. objavila obavijest o presudama u spojenim predmetima C-186/14 P i C-193/14 P („Obavijest”) kojom se ponovno pokreće ispitni postupak u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limit set out in the Notice.
Osnovne uredbe koji je doveo do donošenja Uredbe o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.
After the reopening of the investigation, the Chinese Iron and Steel Association (‘CISA’) and four Chinese exporting producers submitted comments.
Ponovno pokretanje ograničeno je na utvrđivanje bi li, s obzirom na presude Hubei, bilo prikladno staviti izvan snage Uredbu o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera za sve kineske proizvođače izvoznike osim društva Hubei.
The Commission also received comments from the Defence Committee, representing the Union industry, within the time-limits specified in the Notice.
B. POSTUPAK
Two hearings were held with the Defence Committee in the presence of the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Komisija je o ponovnom pokretanju ispitnog postupka službeno obavijestila industriju Unije koju predstavlja Odbor za obranu industrije bešavnih čeličnih cijevi Europske unije („Odbor za obranu”), druge poznate proizvođače iz Unije, proizvođače izvoznike iz NRK-a, uvoznike/korisnike za koje je poznato da se postupak odnosi na njih te vlasti NRK-a.
The other parties did not request to be heard.
Zainteresirane strane dobile su priliku da iznesu svoja stajališta u pisanom obliku i da zatraže saslušanje u roku određenom u Obavijesti.
C. COMMENTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES
Nakon ponovnog pokretanja ispitnog postupka primjedbe su dostavili Kinesko udruženje za željezo i čelik (CISA) i četiri kineska proizvođača izvoznika.
As mentioned in recital 10, two groups of interested parties, namely the Defence Committee, on one side, and CISA and four Chinese exporting producers, on the other side, provided comments.
Komisija je primila i primjedbe od Odbora za obranu, koji predstavlja industriju Unije, u vremenskim rokovima utvrđenima u Obavijesti.
First, the Defence Committee argued that the Commission should not have annulled the anti-dumping duty in place for Hubei since the Hubei judgments entailed only the annulment of the original measures and not those imposed by the expiry review Regulation.
Održana su dva saslušanja s Odborom za obranu u prisutnosti službenika za saslušanje u trgovinskim postupcima.
The Defence Committee further asserted that the scope of the Hubei judgments could not be extended to legal acts that were not challenged before the Union courts even if these acts are vitiated by the same legal errors.
Druge stranke nisu zatražile saslušanje.
According to the jurisprudence of the European courts, the invalidity of an original regulation affects the validity of subsequent regulations alike.
C. PRIMJEDBE ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANA
In this case, the invalidity of the original measure vis-à-vis Hubei also affected the validity of the expiry review Regulation, insofar as it concerned Hubei.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 10., primjedbe su dostavile dvije skupine zainteresiranih strana, odnosno Odbor za obranu s jedne strane te Kinesko udruženje za željezo i čelik i četiri kineska proizvođača s druge strane.
As a result of the judgment, Hubei is deemed not to have ever been subject to the original measures, and, consequently, neither should it have been subject to the expiry review Regulation.
Odbor za obranu prvo je tvrdio da Komisija nije trebala poništiti antidampinške pristojbe koje su na snazi za društvo Hubei jer presude Hubei podrazumijevaju samo poništavanje izvornih mjera, a ne onih uvedenih na temelju Uredbe o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.
Therefore, the Defence Committee's claim that Hubei should still be subject to anti-dumping duties as imposed by the expiry review Regulation was rejected.
Odbor za obranu tvrdio je i da se područje primjene presuda Hubei nije moglo proširiti na zakonodavne akte koji nisu osporeni pred sudovima Unije, čak i ako su ti akti zahvaćeni istim pravnim pogreškama.
Second, the Defence Committee claimed that the Commission had no legal basis to re-open the expiry review investigation or to repeal the measures imposed by the expiry review Regulation for all exporting producers in China.
U skladu sa sudskom praksom europskih sudova nevaljanost izvorne uredbe utječe na valjanost svih sličnih naknadnih uredbi.
It also claimed that the Hubei judgments did not render the expiry review Regulation invalid since the Commission did not base its findings on the same grounds (declared illegal) in the original investigation.
U ovom je slučaju nevaljanost izvorne mjere u odnosu na društvo Hubei utjecala i na valjanost Uredbe o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera, u dijelu u kojem se odnosi na društvo Hubei.
The Commission also rejected those arguments.
Na temelju presude smatra se da društvo Hubei nikad nije podlijegalo izvornim mjerama te stoga nije trebalo podlijegati ni Uredbi o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.
It follows from case-law that, while a legal consequence of a finding that an act of the European Union is invalid is that the institution that adopted the act must take the necessary measures to remedy the illegality established — the obligation set out in Article 266 TFEU in the event of annulment being applicable by analogy — that institution does nevertheless have a wide discretion in its choice of measures, it being understood that such measures must be compatible with the operative part of the judgment in question and the grounds that constitute its essential basis.
Stoga je tvrdnja Odbora za obranu da bi društvo Hubei ipak trebalo podlijegati antidampinškim pristojbama kako su uvedene Uredbom o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera odbijena.
In this particular case, and by reference to the operative part and the grounds of the Hubei judgments, the Commission considered it appropriate to re-open the investigation in order to assess, after receiving comments from interested parties, whether duties in place on Chinese exporting producers other than Hubei should also be repealed.
Kao drugo, Odbor za obranu tvrdio je da nije postojala pravna osnova da Komisija ponovno pokrene ispitni postupak revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera ili da za sve proizvođače izvoznike iz Kine ukine mjere uvedene Uredbom o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.
In any case, the Commission considers that it has the power to re-open investigations, even where it is not legally bound to do so.
Tvrdio je i da Uredba o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera nije postala nevaljana zbog presuda Hubei jer Komisija svoje nalaze u početnom ispitnom postupku nije temeljila na istoj osnovi (koja je proglašena nezakonitom).
Third, the Defence Committee argued that by repealing the expiry review Regulation the Commission would infringe the principle of legal certainty since the expiry review Regulation became definitive due to the fact it had not been challenged before the Court.
Komisija je odbila i te argumente.
However, as already stated, the invalidity of an original regulation may affect the validity of subsequent regulations to the same extent.
Iz sudske prakse proizlazi da, iako je pravna posljedica utvrđivanja da je akt Europske unije nevaljan ta da ustanova koja je donijela akt mora poduzeti potrebne mjere kako bi uklonila utvrđenu nezakonitost – obveza utvrđena u članku 266.
Thus, even if a subsequent regulation is not challenged before the European courts, it may nonetheless be deemed to be affected by the illegality found in the original regulation – on the basis of which it was enacted – such that it would be necessary to repeal the former to that extent.
UFEU-a u slučaju da je poništenje primjenjivo analogijom – ta ustanova ipak raspolaže opsežnim diskrecijskim pravom pri odabiru mjera, pri čemu se podrazumijeva da takve mjere moraju biti u skladu s izrekom navedene presude i s temeljem koji čini njezinu bitnu osnovu.
In this case, the Commission decided to assess the effects of the Hubei judgments cited in recitals 3 and 4 on the expiry review Regulation.
U ovom konkretnom predmetu te s obzirom na izreku i temelj presuda Hubei Komisija je smatrala prikladnim ponovno pokrenuti ispitni postupak kako bi, nakon što joj zainteresirane stranke dostave primjedbe, ocijenila bi li trebalo ukinuti i pristojbe koje su na snazi za kineske proizvođače izvoznike osim društva Hubei.
In doing so, and in order to respect the rights of defence of interested parties, it requested comments on the effects of those judgments on the expiry review Regulation.
Komisija u svakom slučaju smatra da ima ovlasti ponovno pokrenuti ispitni postupak, čak i ako to nije pravno obvezna učiniti.
Consequently, it is incorrect to argue, without further qualification, that the principle of legal certainty is violated whenever the Commission considers repealing measures which were found partially invalid by the European courts altogether, in particular if it appropriately respected the rights of defence of interested parties.
Treće, Odbor za obranu tvrdio je da bi stavljanjem izvan snage Uredbe o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera Komisija prekršila načelo pravne sigurnosti jer je Uredba o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera postala konačna zbog činjenice da nije osporavana pred Sudom.
Finally, the Defence Committee argued that the repeal of the measures would have a significant negative impact on the Union industry, as concluded in the expiry review investigation in terms of likelihood of recurrence of threat of injury, which should be taken into consideration.
Međutim, kako je prethodno navedeno, nevaljanost izvorne uredbe može u istom opsegu utjecati na valjanost naknadnih uredbi.
The Union industry's comments regarding the impact of the repeal of the measures on their situation are addressed in recitals 58 to 66.
Stoga se, čak i ako naknadna uredba ne bude osporavana pred europskim sudovima, ipak može smatrati da na nju utječe nezakonitost utvrđena u izvornoj uredbi (na temelju koje je navedena uredba donesena) tako da bi naknadnu uredbu u toj mjeri bilo potrebno staviti izvan snage.
By contrast, CISA and the four Chinese companies claimed that the findings regarding the threat of injury affect Hubei and all other Chinese exporting producers equally.
Komisija je u ovom slučaju odlučila ocijeniti učinke presuda Hubei navedene u uvodnim izjavama 3. i 4. na Uredbu o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.
Therefore, according to them, repealing the measures only for Hubei and not for the rest of Chinese exporting producers would be in breach of the principle of non-discrimination.
U tom je pogledu, i kako bi poštovala pravo na obranu zainteresiranih strana, zatražila primjedbe o učincima tih presuda na Uredbu o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.
That argument could also not be accepted.
Stoga je bez ispunjenja daljnjih uvjeta netočno tvrditi da se načelo pravne sigurnosti krši svaki put kada Komisija razmatra ukidanje mjera koje europski sudovi smatraju djelomično nevaljanima, posebno ako je Komisija na odgovarajući način poštovala pravo zainteresiranih strana na obranu.
The principle of non-discrimination prohibits, first, treating similar situations differently and, secondly, treating different situations in the same way unless there are objective reasons for such treatment.
Konačno, Odbor za obranu tvrdio je da bi, kako je zaključeno u ispitnom postupku revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera, ukidanje mjera imalo znatan negativan utjecaj na industriju Unije u pogledu vjerojatnosti ponavljanja prijetnje štete, koji bi trebalo uzeti u obzir.
However, since other Chinese exporting producers did not challenge the original and/or the expiry review Regulation before the General Court, they find themselves in a different position than Hubei.
Primjedbe industrije Unije u pogledu utjecaja ukidanja mjera na situaciju u industriji navedene su u uvodnim izjavama od 58. do 66.
This fact justifies a different treatment vis-à-vis the application of the expiry review Regulation.
S druge strane, Kinesko udruženje za željezo i čelik i četiri kineska trgovačka društva tvrdila su da nalazi o prijetnji štete jednako utječu na društvo Hubei i na sve druge kineske proizvođače izvoznike.
Therefore, a difference in treatment alone cannot be considered discriminatory as long as the parties complaining against this differential position are not in the same position as Hubei.
Stoga oni smatraju da bi ukidanje mjera samo za društvo Hubei, a ne za ostatak kineskih proizvođača izvoznika bilo kršenje načela zabrane diskriminacije.
In fact, in this particular case, the Commission is under no legal obligation to repeal the measures vis-à-vis the remaining exporting producers as only Hubei chose to contest the findings of that regulation before the European courts.
Ni taj se argument nije mogao prihvatiti.
CISA and the four Chinese companies also submitted that the illegality found by the Court of Justice meant that the investigation leading to the original measures should have never been initiated since the premise for its initiation was the alleged threat of injury which the Court found to never have existed.
Načelom zabrane diskriminacije zabranjuje se, kao prvo, različito postupanje u sličnim situacijama i, kao drugo, jednako postupanje u različitim situacijama, osim ako za to postoje objektivni razlozi.
Accordingly, CISA and the four Chinese companies claimed that the nature of the illegality found by the Court affected the legality of the entire anti-dumping measure and thus raised an issue of public interest which should prevail over the principle of legal certainty.
Međutim, budući da drugi kineski proizvođači izvoznici nisu izvornu Uredbu i/ili Uredbu o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera osporavali pred Općim sudom, oni i društvo Hubei nisu u istom položaju.
CISA did not explain how maintaining the measures for the remaining exporting producers could be against the overall Union interest, in particular considering the findings during the expiry review investigation that concluded, inter alia, that they were no compelling reasons of Union interest against the maintenance of the anti-dumping measures on imports from China.
Ta činjenica opravdava različito postupanje u odnosu na primjenu Uredbe o reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera.