natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, the objective of the agreements does neither indicate that the workforce would be completely transferred from SEAH to Airport Handling, nor that the conditions prevailing under SEAH’s work contracts would be continued.
Kao što je opisano u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 38., sporazum između društva Airport Handling i sindikata od 4. lipnja 2014. nije bitno promijenjen nakon što su ga sindikati odbili na referendumu na kojem su zahtijevali određena pojašnjenja sporazuma.
The Commission notes in particular that according to the initial draft settlement of 4 November 2013 between SEA and trade unions, a future implementing agreement must be inspired by the objective to safeguard the jobs of all SEAH personnel.
S obzirom na prethodna razmatranja, stvarni prijenos radne snage nije bio potpun niti je podrazumijevao ikakvo preslikavanje sadržaja uvjeta zapošljavanja koji su bili mjerodavni na temelju ugovora sa SEAH-om.
That agreement enumerates a number of measures to attain that objective, in essence all mechanisms made available by the relevant legislation governing employment and collective bargaining such as social safety nets and voluntary redundancies, also to be implemented within the SEA Group, and solutions involving relocation within the Group.
Na taj nalaz ne utječu sporazumi između društva SEA, SEAH odnosno Airport Handling te sindikata u pogledu radne snage.
Hence, that agreement indeed implied that jobs were to be reattributed within the SEA group as a whole, but not only to Airport Handling, and only as one measure among several.
Naime, u predmetu sporazuma nije navedeno ni da će radna snaga u potpunosti biti prenesena sa SEAH-a na Airport Handling ni da će mjerodavni uvjeti iz SEAH-ova ugovora o radu nastaviti vrijediti.
Moreover, those agreements were not concluded with Airport Handling, which concluded separate agreements with the personnel.
Komisija posebno napominje da prema početnom nacrtu nagodbe društva SEA i sindikata od 4. studenoga 2013. cilj budućeg provedbenog sporazuma mora biti zaštita radnih mjesta svih zaposlenika SEAH-a.
Therefore, the number of jobs reallocated to Airport Handling was not pre-determined by the parties but was established following the company’s staffing needs after conclusion of the contracts with the airlines.
U sporazumu je nabrojeno nekoliko mjera za postizanje tog cilja, u biti svi mehanizmi dostupni u okviru relevantnog zakonodavstva o zapošljavanju i kolektivnih ugovora, kao što su mreže za socijalnu pomoć i dobrovoljni odlasci zaposlenika, što treba primijeniti i u okviru grupe SEA, te rješenja koja uključuju premještaj zaposlenika unutar te grupe.
The Commission further notes that there is no indication that Airport Handling was under any obligation, imposed either by public authorities or by its mother company SEA, to employ former SEAH staff.
Stoga je taj sporazum doista podrazumijevao ponovnu dodjelu radnih mjesta unutar grupe SEA kao cjeline, ali ne samo društvu Airport Handling i samo kao jednu od mjera.
In conclusion, as regards the scope of the transfer of the workforce, the Commission considers that the circumstances indicate a prima facie stronger element of economic continuity due to the reemployment of a significant part of SEAH’s workforce by Airport Handling.
Nadalje, ti sporazumi nisu sklopljeni s društvom Airport Handling koje je sa zaposlenicima sklopilo zasebne sporazume.
However, the facts surrounding the reemployment must be taken into account, in particular the termination of all contracts and the conclusion of new contracts with new contractual conditions.
Stoga strane nisu unaprijed odredile broj radnih mjesta preraspodijeljenih društvu Airport Handling, nego je on utvrđen u skladu s potrebama društva za zaposlenicima nakon sklapanja ugovora sa zračnim prijevoznicima.
The Commission therefore concludes that the workforce transfer cannot be construed as a strong indication of economic continuity between SEAH and Airport Handling.
Nadalje, Komisija napominje da postoje naznake da je Airport Handling bio obvezan zaposliti bivše zaposlenike SEAH-a, neovisno o tome je su li tu obvezu nametnula javna tijela ili SEA, njegovo matično društvo.
Contracts with air carriers
Zaključno, u pogledu opsega prijenosa radne snage Komisija smatra da se okolnostima prima facie upućuje na izraženiji element gospodarskog kontinuiteta zbog ponovnog zapošljavanja znatnog dijela SEAH-ove radne snage u društvu Airport Handling.
In its 2014 opening decision, the Commission took the preliminary view that Airport Handling’s expected market shares for the first 6 months of operations could only be seen as realistic due to the insourcing of business previously undertaken by SEAH.
Međutim, potrebno je uzeti u obzir činjenice u pogledu ponovnog zapošljavanja, posebno raskida svih ugovora i sklapanja novih s novim ugovornim uvjetima.
In the course of the investigation, Italy, SEA and Airport Handling claimed that those expectations were based on Airport Handling’s business plan of August 2014.
Komisija, stoga, zaključuje da se prijenos radne snage ne može tumačiti kao snažna naznaka gospodarskog kontinuiteta između SEAH-a i društva Airport Handling.
They were made possible by laying down significant reductions in operating costs, gained through labour efficiency and personnel reduction.
Ugovori za zračnim prijevoznicima
Moreover, the contracts with airlines operating at Milan airports were negotiated ex novo by Airport Handling.
U svojoj odluci o pokretanju postupka iz 2014.
According to Italy, such contracts could not be legally transferred from SEAH to Airport Handling.
Komisija je zauzela preliminarno stajalište da bi se očekivani tržišni udjeli društva Airport Handling za prvih šest mjeseci poslovanja mogli smatrati realnima zbog preuzimanja poslovanja koje je prethodno obavljao SEAH.
They had to be negotiated ex novo in competition with the other service providers operating at Milan airports.
Tijekom istražnog postupka Italija, SEA i Airport Handling tvrdili su da su se ta očekivanja temeljila na poslovnom planu društva Airport Handling iz kolovoza 2014.
Indeed, as was described above in recitals 133 and 208, Airport Handling’s client portfolio differs from that of SEAH.
Bila su moguća zahvaljujući znatnim smanjenima operativnih troškova koja su ostvarena zbog djelotvornosti radne snage i smanjenja osoblja.
When SEAH exited the market, a number of its clients decided to entrust ground handling services to operators other than Airport Handling.
Nadalje, Airport Handling je iznova pregovarao o ugovorima sa zračnim prijevoznicima koji posluju u milanskim zračnim lukama.
Conversely, Airport Handling managed to attract customers which were not previously served by SEAH.
Italija je smatrala da se ti ugovoru nisu mogli zakonski prenijeti sa SEAH-a na Airport Handling.
In order to further evidence the fact that the new contracts concluded by Airport Handling with the air carriers were not only subject to ex novo negotiation but also provide for materially different contractual conditions, Italy submitted information showing that certain airlines previously served by SEAH (such as […] [8] Business secret.
O njima se moralo iznova pregovarati u konkurenciji s ostalim pružateljima usluga koji posluju u milanskim zračnim lukama.
) were able to obtain significantly more favourable conditions from Airport Handling than from SEAH.
Naime, kako je prethodno opisano u uvodnim izjavama 133. i 208. portfelj klijenata društva Airport Handling razlikuje se od SEAH-ova.
In particular, in the course of the negotiations with Airport Handling, […] [8] Business secret.
Kad je SEAH izašao s tržišta, niz njegovih klijenata odlučio je zemaljske usluge povjeriti drugim subjektima, a ne društvu Airport Handling.
requested that […] [8] Business secret.
S druge strane, Airport Handling uspio je privući klijente koji prije nisu bili klijenti SEAH-a.
As a result[…] [8] Business secret.
Kako bi dodatno dokazala činjenicu da novi ugovori koje je Airport Handling sklopio sa zračnim prijevoznicima nisu bili samo predmet novih pregovora, nego da su u njima predviđeni materijalno drukčiji ugovorni uvjeti, Italija je dostavila informacije iz kojih je vidljivo da su određeni zračni prijevoznici koji su prije bili klijenti SEAH-a (kao što je […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
obtained a […] [8] Business secret.
) uspjeli dobiti znatno povoljnije uvjete od društva Airport Handling, nego od SEAH-a.
In the course of the investigation, Italy explained that SEA had not conditioned the granting of discounts from airport charges to air carriers operating at Milan airports on conclusion by the latter of ground handling contracts with Airport Handling.
Konkretno, tijekom pregovora s društvom Airport Handling, […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Based on the comments received in the investigation, there is no documentary evidence to prove that SEA would have effectively engaged in such behaviour in order to induce airlines operating at Milan airports to conclude new ground handling contracts with Airport Handling.
zatražio je da […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
In the 2014 opening decision, the Commission expressed doubts that contracts with the airlines would be renegotiated.
Kao rezultat […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
In that context the Commission pointed to information that suggests that even before the expiry of such contracts, SEA and Airport Handling had engaged in joint marketing efforts aiming at reassuring airlines operating at the airport that SEA would continue the ground handling business.
dobio je […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
The formal investigation procedure however did not produce any factual evidence that SEA and Airport Handling had organised, through joint marketing efforts, a mere change of contractor without leaving the airlines, as principals, a margin for renegotiation of the contractual terms.
Tijekom istražnog postupka Italija je objasnila da SEA zračnim prijevoznicima koji posluju u milanskim zračnim lukama nije uvjetovala popuste na naknade zračne luke njihovim sklapanjem ugovora o pružanju zemaljskih usluga s društvom Airport Handling.
In particular, the Commission did not obtain any evidence that either SEA or Airport Handling would have been in a position to effectively frustrate attempts of former SEAH-customers to obtain more favourable terms from other ground handling providers.
Na temelju primjedbi zaprimljenih tijekom istražnog postupka ne postoje dokumenti na temelju kojih se može dokazati da je SEA stvarno tako postupala kako bi zračne prijevoznike koji posluju u milanskim zračnim lukama potaknula da sklope nove ugovore o pružanju zemaljskih usluga s društvom Airport Handling.
The Commission assessed if Airport Handling, when preparing its entry into business, de-facto was in the position of a new entrant or rather benefitted from SEAH’s market position and customer contacts, so as to ensure the continuity of operations.
U odluci o pokretanju postupka iz 2014.
Under the specific circumstances of the case in hand, if SEAH’s market exit had not resulted in an opportunity for its customers to negotiate new contracts with ground handlers other than Airport Handling, this could be indicative of a circumvention of the recovery decision in that it would amount to a transfer of customers from SEAH to Airport Handling.
Komisija je izrazila sumnju u to hoće li se sa zračnim prijevoznicima ponovno pregovarati o ugovorima.
In that respect, the following is of particular relevance: Airport Handling’s business plan did not consider alternative scenarios with lower market shares.
U tom je kontekstu Komisija uputila na informacije iz kojih se može zaključiti da su SEA i Airport Handling, čak i prije isteka tih ugovora, ulagali zajedničke marketinške napore kako bi zračne prijevoznike koji posluju u zračnoj luci uvjerili da će SEA nastaviti obavljati poslove zemaljskih usluga.
This could indicate that Airport Handling was confident to take over SEAH’s customer basis with a relatively high degree of likelihood and could thus possibly expect to benefit from SEAH’s former market position and customer contacts to attract its customers and the corresponding contracts without facing competition by other ground handling companies to win those contracts.
Međutim, tijekom službenog istražnog postupka nisu dobiveni nikakvi činjenični podatci da su SEA i Airport Handling u okviru zajedničkih marketinških napora organizirali samo promjenu izvođača, a da pritom zračnim prijevoznicima, kao naručiteljima, nisu ostavili prostora za ponovno pregovaranje o ugovornim uvjetima.
However, certain formal and material factors show that such was not the case.
Konkretno, Komisija nije dobila nikakve dokaze da je SEA ili Airport Handling mogao stvarno otežavati pokušaje bivših klijenata SEAH-a da dobiju povoljnije uvjete od drugih pružatelja zemaljskih usluga.
Firstly, as regards the form of the transfer, service contracts were not legally transferred from SEAH to Airport Handling.
Komisija je ocijenila je li Airport Handling, kad je pripremao pokretanje poslovanja, de facto bio u situaciji novog sudionika na tržištu ili je, naprotiv, ostvario koristi od SEAH-ova tržišnog položaja i kontakata s klijentima kako bi osigurao kontinuitet poslovanja.
Airlines were thus free to select a provider other than Airport Handling as soon as their contracts with SEAH were terminated, as described in recital 43 of the present decision.
U specifičnim okolnostima ovog predmeta, da nakon izlaska SEAH-a s tržišta njegovi klijenti nisu mogli pregovarati o novim ugovorima s drugim pružateljima zemaljskih usluga osim društvom Airport Handling, to bi bio pokazatelj izbjegavanja odluke o povratu jer bi to bio prijenos klijenata sa SEAH-a na Airport Handling.
Secondly, available information suggests that customers were in a position to approach other service providers when SEAH informed them that it would cease activities.
U tom su pogledu važne sljedeće činjenice: U poslovnom planu društva Airport Handling nisu uzeti u obzir drugi scenariji s manjim tržišnim udjelima.
Indeed, the fact that a number of clients defected is proof that such opportunity existed.
To bi moglo značiti da je Airport Handling bio uvjeren da će preuzeti bazu klijenata SEAH-a uz relativno visok stupanj vjerojatnosti te je, stoga, možda mogao očekivati da će ostvariti koristi od nekadašnjeg SEAH-ova tržišnog položaja i kontakata s klijentima kako bi privukao njegove klijente i odgovarajuće kontakte, a da se pritom ne mora suočiti s konkurencijom drugih društava za zemaljske usluge kako bi dobio te ugovore.
Most importantly, SEAH had no legal grounds to unilaterally transfer the contracts to any third party, save in exceptional situations.
Međutim, iz određenih formalnih i materijalnih čimbenika vidljivo je da to nije bio slučaj.
According to information provided by the Italian authorities, the clause on exceptional situations had however not been invoked.
Prvo, u pogledu oblika prijenosa ugovori o pružanju usluga nisu se mogli zakonski prenijeti sa SEAH-a na Airport Handling.
The Italian authorities provided an overview of Airport Handling’s customer base, as of 14 February 2014, which shows that out of 68 former SEAH customers, […] [8] Business secret.
Stoga su zračni prijevoznici mogli odabrati drugog pružatelja, a ne Airport Handling, čim su njihovi ugovori sa SEAH-om raskinuti, kako je opisano u uvodnoj izjavi 43. ove odluke.
had defected to other ground handling service providers, that of the […] [8] Business secret.
Drugo, iz dostupnih informacija može se zaključiti da su klijenti mogli pristupiti drugim pružateljima usluga kad ih je SEAH obavijestio da će prekinuti poslovanje.
Airport Handling clients at that time, 1 had defected from a competitor, 3 were newcomers to the airport and […] [8] Business secret.
Naime, činjenica da je niz klijenata otišao dokaz je da je takva prilika postojala.
were former SEAH-clients.
Najvažnije, SEAH nije imao nikakve pravne osnove da jednostrano prenese ugovore na treće strane, osim u iznimnim situacijama.
of those […] [8] Business secret.
Međutim, u skladu s informacijama koje su dostavila talijanska tijela klauzula o iznimnim situacijama nije aktivirana.
clients), or even a combination of both ([…] [8] Business secret.
prešlo drugim pružateljima zemaljskih usluga, da je od […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
clients).
tadašnjih klijenata društva Airport Handling jedan prešao od konkurenta, tri su bili novi u zračnoj luci i […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Hence, only 20 clients concluded service contracts that in essence stipulate the same conditions as the previous contracts with SEAH.
su bili bivši klijenti SEAH-a.
Price reductions are ranging from […] [8] Business secret. to […] [8] Business secret.
od tih […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
% compared to prices previously agreed with SEAH.
bivših klijenata SEAH-a pregovorima je dogovorilo nove ugovore po povoljnijim uvjetima, u kojima su propisane niže cijene (13 klijenata), izmjena portfelja usluga ([…] [8] Poslovna tajna.
In view of the above, on balance, the Commission sees no indication of circumvention of the recovery decision (and thus economic continuity) in the process that led Airport Handling to enter into agreements with a number of former customers of SEAH.
klijenata) ili čak njihova kombinacija ([…] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Indeed, Airport Handling appeared to have been exposed to genuine competition when negotiating with carriers operating at Milan airports, and there are indications that competition between service providers at Milan’s airports was effectively opened when SEAH was about to exit the market.
klijenata).
SEAH’s assets
Stoga je samo 20 klijenata sklopilo ugovore o pružanju usluga kojima se, u biti, propisuju isti uvjeti kao u prethodnim ugovorima sa SEAH-om.
As a third point in the analysis of the scope of the transfer, the Commission assessed the scope of the transfer of the assets.
% u usporedbi s cijenama koje su prethodno dogovorene sa SEAH-om.
The Commission notes that, when Airport Handling started operations, it sourced 100 % of its entire ground handling equipment from SEAH through leasing.
S obzirom na prethodno navedeno i kad se sve zajedno uzme u obzir, Komisija nije utvrdila naznake izbjegavanja odluke o povratu (i stoga gospodarskog kontinuiteta) u postupku koji je doveo Airport Handling do sklapanja sporazuma s nizom bivših klijenata SEAH-a.
5 months later, it started gradually replacing that equipment with assets bought on the market and finally, in September 2015, purchased […] [8] Business secret.
Naime, činilo se da je Airport Handling bio izložen stvarnoj konkurenciji kad je pregovarao s prijevoznicima koji posluju u milanskim zračnim lukama te stoga postoje naznake da je tržišno natjecanje među pružateljima usluga u milanskim zračnim lukama stvarno bilo otvoreno kad je SEAH planirao izlazak s tržišta.
of […] [8] Business secret.
Imovina SEAH-a
lots of assets from SEAH.
Kao treću točku u analizi opsega prijenosa Komisija je ocijenila opseg prijenosa imovine.
Specifically, Airport Handling commenced providing ground handling services using SEAH’s assets under a lease contract.
Komisija napominje da je, kad je pokretao poslovanje, Airport Handling cjelokupnu opremu za pružanje zemaljskih usluga nabavio od SEAH-a u okviru najma.
That contract was due to expire on 31 August 2015.
Pet mjeseci kasnije počeo je postupno zamjenjivati tu opremu imovinom koju je kupio na tržištu te je konačno, u rujnu 2015., kupio […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Before the lease contract ended, Airport Handling expressed its interest in the acquisition of […] [8] Business secret.
od […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
out of […] [8] Business secret.
lotova imovine od SEAH-a.
tender lots, namely lots No […] [8] Business secret.
Točnije, Airport Handling počeo je pružati zemaljske usluge upotrebom SEAH-ove imovine na temelju ugovora o najmu.
According to Airport Handling, although realistically around one third of the ground handling equipment owned by SEAH and leased to Airport Handling was aged, Airport Handling was willing to acquire around […] [8] Business secret.
Taj je ugovor trebao isteći 31. kolovoza 2015.
% of that equipment (which would be sufficient for Airport Handling to run its business) considering that Airport Handling had in the meantime obtained on the market a significant stock of spare parts which could be used for the replacement of some parts of the most aged SEAH equipment.
Prije isteka ugovora o najmu Airport Handling izrazio je interes za stjecanje […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Available documentation suggests that sales negotiations between Airport Handling and SEAH commenced when by letter dated 3 June 2015 Airport Handling made the following proposals:
od […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
%-discount on the […] [8] Business secret.
Airport Handling je naveo da, iako je realno oko jedne trećine opreme za pružanje zemaljskih usluga u vlasništvu SEAH-a koja je iznajmljena društvu Airport Handling zastarjelo, Airport Handling bio je spreman steći oko […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
in view of, firstly, the fleet’s age and condition and secondly the outcome of the sales procedure initiated by SEA,
% te opreme (što bi društvu Airport Handling bilo dovoljno za poslovanje), uzimajući u obzir da je Airport Handling u međuvremenu na tržištu dobio znatnu zalihu rezervnih dijelova koji su se mogli upotrijebiti za zamjenu nekih dijelova najstarije SEAH-ove opreme.
payment […] [8] Business secret.
Iz dostupne dokumentacije može se zaključiti da su pregovori o prodaji između društva Airport Handling i SEAH-a započeli kad je dopisom od 3. lipnja 2015.
from 31 July until 31 December 2015, that the original lease contract be terminated consensually on 30 June 2015 and that SEAH grants provisional and limited free-lease (comodato) of approx. […] [8] Business secret.
Airport Handling dostavio sljedeće prijedloge:
selected items […] [8] Business secret.
da se popust od […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
, until 31 December 2015 at the latest, all insurance and maintenance costs being at the expense of Airport Handling.
% na […] [8] Poslovna tajna. s obzirom na, prvo, starost i stanje opreme te, drugo, ishod postupka prodaje koji je pokrenula SEA,
On the same day, a meeting between the parties was held.
plaćanje […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
By letter of 10 June 2015, SEAH’s liquidator responded to Airport Handling’s proposals, in the sense summarised below:
odabranih stavki […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Although SEAH is willing to accept the offer, it is not ready to grant discounts since all prices had been determined by expert evaluations.
, najkasnije do 31. prosinca 2015., pri čemu bi Airport Handling snosio sve troškove osiguranja i održavanja.
The liquidator pointed out that Airport Handling would not even have to bear any transport costs.
Istog su dana te strane održale sastanak.
SEAH does not accept payment in instalments except if Airport Handling provides adequate guarantees.
Dopisom od 10. lipnja 2015. likvidator SEAH-a odgovorio je na prijedloge društva Airport Handling na način koji se sažet u nastavku:
In the absence of discounts, SEAH is willing to transfer the fleet on 30 June 2015 and to agree to lend the specified items, however only until 30 November 2015 at the latest.
Iako je SEAH voljan prihvatiti ponudu, ne može odobriti popuste jer su sve cijene određene u stručnim ocjenama.
According to the Italian authorities, negotiations still drew on until September 2015, when SEAH agreed to the payment of the purchase price […] [8] Business secret.
Likvidator je istaknuo da Airport Handling neće morati snositi ni troškove prijevoza,
for the sale of the […] [8] Business secret.
SEAH ne prihvaća plaćanje u ratama, osim ako Airport Handling dostavi odgovarajuća jamstva,
lots, […] [8] Business secret.
Budući da ne odobrava popust, SEAH je voljan prenijeti flotu 30. lipnja 2015. i posuditi određene stavke, ali najkasnije do 30. studenoga 2015.
The purchase price was EUR […] [8] Business secret.
Talijanska tijela navela su da su se pregovori nastavili još do rujna 2015., kad je SEAH pristao na plaćanje kupovne cijene […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
, that is the price initially indicated in the failed tender procedure.
za prodaju […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
The original lease was exceptionally extended until […] [8] Business secret.
lotova, […] [8] Poslovna tajna.