natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Danish Environmental Protection Agency (ed.), Status and trends of the aquatic environment and agricultural practice in Denmark, Report to the European Commission for the period 2012-2015 in accordance with Article 10 of the Nitrates Directive (1991/676/EEC), September 2016.
Direktivi Vijeća 91/676/EEZ o zaštiti voda od onečišćenja uzrokovanog nitratima iz poljoprivrednih izvora i njezina članka 9.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
(SL L 319, 23.11.2002., str. 24.).
Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (OJ L 108, 25.4.2007, p. 1).
Odluka Komisije 2005/294/EZ od 5. travnja 2005. o zahtjevu za odstupanje iz stavka 2. točke (b) Priloga III.
Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549).
Direktivi Vijeća 91/676/EEZ o zaštiti voda od onečišćenja uzrokovanog nitratima iz poljoprivrednih izvora i njezina članka 9.
On 18 November 2002, the Commission adopted Decision 2002/915/EC [2] granting a derogation requested by Denmark pursuant to Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, allowing the application of livestock manure containing up to 230 kg nitrogen per hectare per year on certain cattle holdings within the framework of the Danish action programme 1999 to 2003.
(SL L 94, 13.4.2005., str. 34.).
The derogation was extended by Commission Decision 2005/294/EC [3] in connection with the Danish action programme 2004 to 2007, by Commission Decision 2008/664/EC [4] in connection with the Danish action programme 2008-2012 and by Commission Implementing Decision 2012/659/EU [5] in connection with the Danish action programme 2008 to 2015.
Odluka Komisije 2008/664/EZ od 8. kolovoza 2008. o izmjeni Odluke 2005/294/EZ o zahtjevu za odstupanje iz stavka 2. točke (b) Priloga III.
The Danish legislation should include a combined targeted scheme for voluntary and mandatory catch crops for 2017 and 2018.
Direktivi Vijeća 91/676/EEZ o zaštiti voda od onečišćenja uzrokovanog nitratima iz poljoprivrednih izvora i njezina članka 9.
Having regard to Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) [1], and in particular Articles 9(3) and 11(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2008/56/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 17. lipnja 2008. o uspostavljanju okvira za djelovanje Zajednice u području politike morskog okoliša (Okvirna direktiva o pomorskoj strategiji) [1], a posebno njezin članak 9. stavak 3. i članak 11. stavak 4.,
In addition, that Decision stated that it would be appropriate to carry out its revision as soon as possible after the completion of the assessment required under Article 12 of Directive 2008/56/EC, in time to support a successful update of marine strategies that are due by 2018, pursuant to Article 17 of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Nadalje, u Odluci je navedeno da bi njihovu reviziju bilo primjereno provesti u što kraćem roku nakon završetka procjene na temelju članka 12.
In 2012, on the basis of the initial assessment of their marine waters made pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC, Member States reported on the environmental status of their marine waters and notified to the Commission their determination of good environmental status and their environmental targets in accordance with Articles 9(2) and 10(2) of Directive 2008/56/EC, respectively.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ kako bi se pravovremeno doprinijelo uspješnom ažuriranju pomorskih strategija, što u skladu s člankom 17.
The results showed the necessity to significantly improve the quality and coherence of the determination of good environmental status by the Member States.
Na temelju početne procjene svojih morskih voda provedene u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 1.
In addition, the assessment recognised that regional cooperation must be at the very heart of the implementation of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ, države članice su 2012. izvijestile o stanju okoliša morskih voda, a Komisiju obavijestile o utvrđivanju značajki dobrog stanja okoliša i okolišnih ciljeva u skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 2. odnosno člankom 10. stavkom 2.
It also emphasised the need for Member States to more systematically build upon standards stemming from Union legislation or, where they do not exist, upon standards set by Regional Sea Conventions or other international agreements.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ.
To ensure that the second cycle of implementation of the marine strategies of the Member States further contributes to the achievement of the objectives of Directive 2008/56/EC and yields more consistent determinations of good environmental status, the Commission recommended in its report on the first phase of implementation that, at Union level, the Commission services and Member States collaborate to revise, strengthen and improve Decision 2010/477/EU, aiming at a clearer, simpler, more concise, more coherent and comparable set of good environmental status criteria and methodological standards and, at the same time, review Annex III of Directive 2008/56/EC, and if necessary revise it, and develop specific guidance to ensure a more coherent and consistent approach for assessments in the next implementation cycle.
Usto, procjenom je prepoznato da regionalna suradnja mora imati središnju ulogu u provedbi Direktive 2008/56/EZ.
On the basis of those conclusions, the review process started in 2013 when a roadmap, consisting of several phases (technical and scientific, consultation, and decision-making), was endorsed by the Regulatory Committee established under Article 25(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Naglašena je i potreba da se države članice sustavnije oslanjaju na standarde na temelju postojećeg zakonodavstva Unije ili, ako oni ne postoje, na standarde utvrđene regionalnim konvencijama o moru ili drugim međunarodnim sporazumima.
During this process, the Commission consulted all interested parties, including Regional Sea Conventions.
Kako bi se osiguralo da se drugim ciklusom provedbe pomorskih strategija država članica dodatno doprinosi postizanju ciljeva Direktive 2008/56/EZ te da definicije dobrog stanja okoliša budu dosljednije, Komisija je u svojem izvješću o prvoj fazi provedbe preporučila da na razini Unije službe Komisije i države članice surađuju na reviziji, jačanju i unapređenju Odluke 2010/477/EU u cilju postizanja jasnijeg, jednostavnijeg, sažetijeg, usklađenijeg i usporedivijeg niza kriterija i metodoloških standarda za dobro stanje okoliša te da istodobno preispitaju i prema potrebi revidiraju Prilog III.
In order to facilitate future updates of the initial assessment of Member States' marine waters and their determination of good environmental status, and to ensure greater coherence in implementation of Directive 2008/56/EC across the Union, it is necessary to clarify, revise or introduce criteria, methodological standards, specifications and standardised methods to be used by Member States, compared to the elements currently set out in Decision 2010/477/EU.
Direktivi 2008/56/EZ i razviju posebne smjernice radi osiguravanja usklađenijeg i dosljednijeg pristupa procjenama u sljedećem ciklusu provedbe.
As a result, the number of criteria that Member States need to monitor and assess should be reduced, applying a risk-based approach to those which are retained in order to allow Member States to focus their efforts on the main anthropogenic pressures affecting their waters.
Na temelju tih zaključaka postupak preispitivanja započeo je 2013. kad je Regulatorni odbor osnovan na temelju članka 25. stavka 1.
Finally, the criteria and their use should be further specified, including providing for threshold values or the setting thereof, thereby allowing for the extent to which good environmental status is achieved to be measured across the Union's marine waters.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ potvrdio plan, koji se sastoji od nekoliko faza (tehnički i znanstveni poslovi, savjetovanje i donošenje odluka).
In accordance with the commitment taken by the Commission when adopting its communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: ‘Better regulation for better results — An EU agenda’ [4], this Decision should ensure coherence with other Union legislation.
Tijekom tog postupka Komisija se savjetovala sa svim zainteresiranim stranama, uključujući regionalne konvencije o moru.
To ensure greater consistency and comparability at Union level of Member States' determinations of good environmental status and avoid unnecessary overlaps, it is appropriate to take into account relevant existing standards and methods for monitoring and assessment laid down in Union legislation, including Council Directive 92/43/EEC [5], Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 [7], Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 [8], Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [9], Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [10] and Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Kako bi se olakšala buduća ažuriranja početne procjene morskih voda država članica i njihovo utvrđivanje dobrog stanja okoliša te kako bi se osigurala veća usklađenost u provedbi Direktive 2008/56/EZ u Uniji, potrebno je pojasniti, revidirati i uvesti kriterije, metodološke standarde, specifikacije i standardizirane metode koje će primjenjivati države članice, u odnosu na elemente koji su trenutačno utvrđeni Odlukom 2010/477/EU.
For each of the qualitative descriptors listed in Annex I to Directive 2008/56/EC, and on the basis of the indicative lists in Annex III to that Directive, it is necessary to define the criteria, including the criteria elements and, where appropriate, the threshold values, to be used.
Stoga bi trebalo smanjiti broj kriterija koje države članice moraju pratiti i procjenjivati, a na zadržane kriterije primijeniti pristup koji se temelji na riziku kako bi države članice mogle usmjeriti napore na glavne antropogene pritiske koji utječu na njihove vode.
Threshold values are intended to contribute to Member States' determination of a set of characteristics for good environmental status and inform their assessment of the extent to which good environmental status is being achieved.
Najzad, trebalo bi dodatno razraditi kriterije i njihovu primjenu, uključujući predviđanje ili utvrđivanje graničnih vrijednosti, što bi omogućilo da se utvrdi u kojoj se mjeri postiže dobro stanje okoliša morskih voda Unije.
It is also necessary to set out methodological standards, including the geographic scales for assessment and how the criteria should be used.
U skladu s obvezom koju je Komisija preuzela donošenjem Komunikacije Europskom parlamentu, Vijeću, Europskom gospodarskom i socijalnom odboru i Odboru regija: Bolja regulativa za bolje rezultate – Agenda EU-a [4], ovom bi se Odlukom trebala osigurati usklađenost s drugim zakonodavnim aktima Unije.
Those criteria and methodological standards are to ensure consistency and allow for comparison, between marine regions or subregions, of assessments of the extent to which good environmental status is being achieved.
Kako bi se na razini Unije u državama članicama osigurala veća dosljednost i usporedivost opisa utvrđenog stanja okoliša i izbjegla nepotrebna preklapanja, primjereno je uzeti u obzir mjerodavne postojeće standarde i metode za praćenje i procjenjivanje utvrđene zakonodavstvom Unije, uključujući Direktivu Vijeća 92/43/EEZ [5], Direktivu 2000/60/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [6], Uredbu Komisije (EZ) br. 1881/2006 [7], Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 1967/2006 [8], Direktivu 2008/105/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [9], Direktivu 2009/147/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [10] i Uredbu (EU) br. 1380/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [11].
To ensure comparability between the details of any updates by the Member States following the reviews of certain elements of their marine strategies, sent under Article 17(3) of Directive 2008/56/EC, specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and assessment should be defined, taking into account existing specifications and standards at Union or international level, including regional or subregional level.
Za svaki od kvalitativnih deskriptora iz Priloga I. Direktivi 2008/56/EZ te na temelju okvirnih popisa iz Priloga III. toj Direktivi potrebno je definirati kriterije, uključujući elemente kriterija i, prema potrebi, granične vrijednosti koje će se primjenjivati.
Member States should apply the criteria, methodological standards, specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and assessment laid down in this Decision in combination with the ecosystem elements, anthropogenic pressures and human activities listed in the indicative lists of Annex III to Directive 2008/56/EC and by reference to the initial assessment made pursuant to Article 8(1) of that Directive, when determining a set of characteristics for good environmental status in accordance with Article 9(1) of that Directive, and when establishing coordinated monitoring programmes under Article 11 of that Directive.
Svrha je graničnih vrijednosti pomoći državama članicama u utvrđivanju skupa karakteristika za dobro stanje okoliša i u procjeni mjere u kojoj se postiže dobro stanje okoliša.
In order to establish a clear link between the determination of a set of characteristics for good environmental status and the assessment of progress towards its achievement, it is appropriate to organise the criteria and methodological standards on the basis of the qualitative descriptors laid down in Annex I to Directive 2008/56/EC, taking into account the indicative lists of ecosystem elements, anthropogenic pressures and human activities laid down in Annex III to that Directive.
Usto, nužno je utvrditi metodološke standarde, uključujući geografski opseg procjene, i način na koji bi trebalo primjenjivati kriterije.
Some of those criteria and methodological standards relate in particular to the assessment of environmental status or of predominant pressures and impacts under points (a) or (b) of Article 8(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC, respectively.
Tim se kriterijima i metodološkim standardima treba osigurati dosljednost i omogućiti usporedba morskih regija ili podregija s obzirom na procjenu mjere u kojoj se postiže dobro stanje okoliša.
In cases where no threshold values are laid down, Member States should establish threshold values through Union, regional or subregional cooperation, for instance by referring to existing values or developing new ones in the framework of the Regional Sea Conventions.
Kako bi se osigurala usporedivost podataka o ažuriranjima koja provedu države članice nakon preispitivanja određenih elemenata svojih pomorskih strategija poslanih na temelju članka 17. stavka 3.
In cases where threshold values should be established through cooperation at Union level (for the descriptors on marine litter, underwater noise and seabed integrity), this will be done in the framework of the Common Implementation Strategy set up by the Member States and the Commission for the purposes of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ, trebalo bi utvrditi specifikacije i standardizirane metode za praćenje i procjenu, uzimajući u obzir postojeće specifikacije i standarde na razini Unije ili na međunarodnoj razini, uključujući regionalnu i podregionalnu razinu.
Once established through Union, regional or subregional cooperation, these threshold values will only become part of Member States' sets of characteristics for good environmental status when they are sent to the Commission as part of Member States' reporting under Article 17(3) of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Države članice trebale bi primjenjivati kriterije, metodološke standarde, specifikacije i standardizirane metode za praćenje i procjenu utvrđene ovom Odlukom zajedno s elementima ekosustava, antropogenim pritiscima i ljudskim djelatnostima navedenima u okvirnim popisima iz Priloga III.
Until such threshold values are established through Union, regional or subregional cooperation, Member States should be able to use national threshold values, directional trends or pressure-based threshold values as proxies.
Direktivi 2008/56/EZ, uz upućivanje na početnu procjenu provedenu u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 1. te Direktive prilikom utvrđivanja skupa karakteristika dobrog stanja okoliša u skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 1. te Direktive i prilikom izrade usklađenih programa za praćenje na temelju članka 11. te Direktive.
Threshold values should reflect, where appropriate, the quality level that reflects the significance of an adverse effect for a criterion and should be set in relation to a reference condition.
Kako bi se uspostavila jasna poveznica između utvrđivanja skupa karakteristika za dobro stanje okoliša i procjene napretka u njegovu postizanju, primjereno je organizirati kriterije i metodološke standarde na temelju kvalitativnih deskriptora utvrđenih u Prilogu I. Direktivi 2008/56/EZ, uzimajući u obzir okvirne popise elemenata ekosustava, antropogenih pritisaka i ljudskih djelatnosti utvrđenih u Prilogu III. toj Direktivi.
Threshold values should be consistent with Union legislation and set at appropriate geographic scales to reflect the different biotic and abiotic characteristics of the regions, subregions and subdivisions.
Neki od predmetnih kriterija i metodoloških standarda odnose se na procjenu stanja okoliša ili glavnih pritisaka i utjecaja iz članka 8. stavka 1. točaka (a) ili (b) Direktive 2008/56/EZ.
This means that even if the process to establish threshold values takes place at Union level, this may result in the setting of different threshold values, which are specific to a region, subregion or subdivision.
U slučajevima kad ne postoje granične vrijednosti, države članice trebale bi utvrditi te vrijednosti putem suradnje na razini Unije, regije ili podregije, primjerice upućivanjem na postojeće vrijednosti i uspostavom novih u okviru regionalnih konvencija o moru.
Threshold values should also be set on the basis of the precautionary principle, reflecting the potential risks to the marine environment.
U slučajevima kad bi granične vrijednosti trebalo utvrditi putem suradnje na razini Unije (za deskriptore za otpatke u moru, podvodnu buku i cjelovitost morskog dna) to će se učiniti u okviru Zajedničke provedbene strategije koju su utvrdile države članice i Komisija za potrebe Direktive 2008/56/EZ.
The setting of threshold values should accommodate the dynamic nature of marine ecosystems and their elements, which can change in space and time through hydrological and climatic variation, predator-prey relationships and other environmental factors.
Nakon što se granične vrijednosti utvrde putem suradnje na razini Unije, regije ili podregije, one će se uvrstiti u skup karakteristika država članica za dobro stanje okoliša tek kad se pošalju Komisiji u okviru izvješća država članica na temelju članka 17. stavka 3.
Threshold values should also reflect the fact that marine ecosystems may recover, if deteriorated, to a state that reflects prevailing physiographic, geographic, climatic and biological conditions, rather than return to a specific state of the past.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ.
In accordance with Article 1(3) of Directive 2008/56/EC, the collective pressure of human activities needs to be kept within levels compatible with the achievement of good environmental status, ensuring that the capacity of marine ecosystems to respond to human-induced changes is not compromised.
Dok se takve granične vrijednosti ne utvrde putem suradnje na razini Unije, regije ili podregije, države članice trebale bi kao zamjenske vrijednosti moći primjenjivati nacionalne granične vrijednosti, trendove promjene ili granične vrijednosti koje se temelje na pritisku.
This may entail, where appropriate, that threshold values for certain pressures and their environmental impacts are not necessarily achieved in all areas of Member States' marine waters, provided that this does not compromise the achievement of the objectives of Directive 2008/56/EC, while enabling the sustainable use of marine goods and services.
Ako je to primjereno, granične vrijednosti trebale bi predstavljati razinu kvalitete koja odražava važnost štetnog utjecaja za kriterij i trebale bi se utvrditi u odnosu na referentno stanje.
It is necessary to lay down threshold values which will be part of the set of characteristics used by Member States in their determination of good environmental status in accordance with Article 9(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC, and the extent to which the threshold values are to be achieved.
Granične vrijednosti trebalo bi uskladiti sa zakonodavstvom Unije i utvrditi u odgovarajućem geografskom opsegu kako bi odražavale različite biotičke i abiotičke karakteristike regija, podregija i daljnjih podjela.
Threshold values therefore do not, by themselves, constitute Member States' determinations of good environmental status.
To znači da čak i ako se postupak utvrđivanja graničnih vrijednosti odvija na razini Unije, mogu se utvrditi različite granične vrijednosti specifične za regiju, podregiju ili daljnju podjelu.
Member States should express the extent to which good environmental status is being achieved as the proportion of their marine waters over which the threshold values have been achieved or as the proportion of criteria elements (species, contaminants, etc.) that have achieved the threshold values.
Usto, granične vrijednosti trebale bi se utvrditi na temelju načela opreznosti tako da odražavaju moguće rizike za morski okoliš.
When assessing the status of their marine waters in accordance with Article 17(2)(a) of Directive 2008/56/EC, Member States should express any change in status as improving, stable or deteriorating compared to the previous reporting period, in view of the often slow response of the marine environment to change.
Pri utvrđivanju graničnih vrijednosti trebala bi se uzeti u obzir dinamička priroda morskih ekosustava i njihovih elemenata, koja se može mijenjati u prostoru i vremenu uslijed hidroloških i klimatskih varijacija, odnosa grabežljivaca i plijena te drugih faktora u području okoliša.
Where threshold values, set in accordance with this Decision, are not met for a particular criterion, Member States should consider taking appropriate measures or carrying out further research or investigation.
Granične vrijednosti trebale bi odražavati i činjenicu da se morski ekosustavi čije se stanje pogoršalo mogu oporaviti do stanja koje odražava glavne fiziografske, geografske, klimatske i biološke uvjete, umjesto da se vrate u određeno stanje iz prošlosti.
Where Member States are required to cooperate at regional or subregional level, they should use, where practical and appropriate, existing regional institutional cooperation structures, including those under Regional Sea Conventions, as provided under Article 6 of Directive 2008/56/EC.
U skladu s člankom 1. stavkom 3.
Similarly, in the absence of specific criteria, methodological standards, including for integration of the criteria, specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and assessment, Member States should build upon, where practical and appropriate, those developed at international, regional or subregional level, for instance those agreed in the framework of the Regional Sea Conventions, or other international mechanisms.
Direktive 2008/56/EZ ukupni pritisak ljudskih djelatnosti treba se zadržati na razinama koje su u skladu s postizanjem dobrog stanja okoliša, čime se osigurava da se ne ugrozi sposobnost odgovora morskih ekosustava na promjene koje uzrokuje čovjek.