natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 20. ožujka 2017.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/364 of 1 July 2015 on the classification of the reaction to fire performance of construction products pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 68, 15.3.2016, p. 4).
Za Komisiju
Commission Decision 2005/610/EC of 9 August 2005 establishing the classes of reaction-to-fire performance of certain construction products (OJ L 208, 11.8.2005, p. 21).
Predsjednik
Products [1]
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/364 оd 1. srpnja 2015. o klasifikaciji reakcije na požar građevnih proizvoda u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 305/2011 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća (SL L 68, 15.3.2016., str. 4.).
Minimum mean density [2](in kg/m3)
Odluka Komisije 2005/610/EZ od 9. kolovoza 2005. o utvrđivanju razreda reakcije na požar određenih građevnih proizvoda (SL L 208, 11.8.2005., str. 21.).
Minimum overall thickness
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
(in mm)
Proizvodi [1]
Class [3]
Najmanja dopuštena prosječna gustoća [2](u kg/m3)
Glued laminated timber products covered by the harmonised standard EN 14080 and structural finger jointed solid timber products covered by the harmonised standard EN 15497
Najmanja dopuštena ukupna debljina
Applies to all species and glues covered by the product standards.
(u mm)
Conditioned in accordance with standard EN 13238.
Razred [3]
Class as set out in Table 1 of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/364.
Proizvodi od lijepljenog višeslojnog drva obuhvaćeni usklađenom normom EN 14080 i konstrukcijski proizvodi od punog zupčasto spojenog drva obuhvaćeni usklađenom normom EN 15497
D-s2, d0
Kondicionirano u skladu s normom EN 13238.
on the conditions for classification, without testing, of external renders and internal plasters based on organic binders covered by the harmonised standard EN 15824 and rendering and plastering mortars covered by the harmonised standard EN 998-1 with regard to their reaction to fire
o uvjetima razredbe bez ispitivanja vanjske i unutarnje žbuke na bazi organskih veziva obuhvaćene usklađenom normom EN 15824 i proizvoda za vanjsko i unutarnje žbukanje obuhvaćenih usklađenom normom EN 998-1 s obzirom na njihovu reakciju na požar
External renders and internal plasters based on organic binders covered by the harmonised standard EN 15824 and rendering and plastering mortars covered by the harmonised standard EN 998-1 should therefore be deemed to satisfy a certain class of performance for reaction to fire established in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/364 on those conditions without further testing being required,
Stoga bi trebalo smatrati da vanjska i unutarnja žbuka na bazi organskih veziva obuhvaćena usklađenom normom EN 15824 i proizvodi za vanjsko i unutarnje žbukanje obuhvaćeni usklađenom normom EN 998-1 odgovaraju određenom razredu svojstva u pogledu reakcije na požar utvrđen u Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2016/364 ako ispunjavaju te uvjete, bez potrebe za daljnjim ispitivanjem,
OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5.
SL L 88, 4.4.2011., str. 5.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/364 of 1 July 2015 on the classification of the reaction to fire performance of construction products pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 68, 15.3.2016, p. 4).
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/364 оd 1. srpnja 2015. o klasifikaciji reakcije na požar građevnih proizvoda u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 305/2011 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća (SL L 68, 15.3.2016., str. 4.).
Class as set out in Table 1 of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/364.
Razred kako je utvrđen u tablici 1.
correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 laying down marketing standards for bananas, rules on the verification of compliance with those marketing standards and requirements for notifications in the banana sector
o ispravku određenih jezičnih verzija Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1333/2011 o utvrđivanju tržišnih standarda za banane, pravila za provjeru usklađenosti s tim tržišnim standardima i zahtjeva u pogledu obavješćivanja u sektoru banana
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 [1], and in particular Article 75(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 17. prosinca 2013. o uspostavljanju zajedničke organizacije tržišta poljoprivrednih proizvoda i stavljanju izvan snage uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 922/72, (EEZ) br. 234/79, (EZ) br. 1037/2001 i (EZ) br. 1234/2007 [1], a posebno njezin članak 75. stavak 2.,
The Dutch, Maltese and Slovenian language versions of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 [2] contain an error in recital (3), in the first paragraph of Article 1, in Article 3 and in point I of Annex I, concerning the varieties of bananas subject to the marketing standards established in that Regulation.
Verzije na malteškom, nizozemskom i slovenskom jeziku Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 1333/2011 [2] sadržavaju pogrešku u uvodnoj izjavi 3., u prvom stavku članka 1., u članku 3. i u točki I. Priloga I. u pogledu sorata banana podložnih tržišnim standardima utvrđenima u toj Uredbi.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 should therefore be corrected accordingly,
Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 1333/2011 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način ispraviti,
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1333/2011 of 19 December 2011 laying down marketing standards for bananas, rules on the verification of compliance with those marketing standards and requirements for notifications in the banana sector (OJ L 336, 20.12.2011, p. 23).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1333/2011 od 19. prosinca 2011. o utvrđivanju tržišnih standarda za banane, pravila za provjeru usklađenosti s tim tržišnim standardima i zahtjeva u pogledu obavješćivanja u sektoru banana (SL L 336, 20.12.2011., str. 23.).
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards further specifying the additional objective criteria for the application of a preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rate for cross-border undrawn credit or liquidity facilities within a group or an institutional protection scheme
o dopuni Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu regulatornih tehničkih standarda kojima se detaljnije određuju dodatni objektivni kriteriji za primjenu povlaštene stope likvidnosnih odljeva ili priljeva za prekogranične neiskorištene kreditne ili likvidnosne linije unutar grupe ili institucionalnog sustava zaštite
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of 26 June 2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1] and in particular Article 422(10) and Article 425(6) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 575/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 26. lipnja 2013. o bonitetnim zahtjevima za kreditne institucije i investicijska društva i o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 [1], a posebno njezin članak 422. stavak 10. i članak 425. stavak 6.,
The application of a preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rate for cross-border undrawn credit or liquidity facilities within a group or an institutional protection scheme (IPS), as provided for in Articles 29 and 34 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 [2], is limited to those cases where the necessary safeguards are in place and only with the prior approval of the competent authorities.
Primjena povlaštene stope likvidnosnih odljeva ili priljeva za prekogranične neiskorištene kreditne ili likvidnosne linije unutar grupe ili institucionalnog sustava zaštite, kako je predviđeno člancima 29. i 34.
These safeguards are provided for in Articles 29(2) and 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 in terms of additional objective criteria to be met in the context of these transactions.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 [2], ograničena je na slučajeve u kojima postoje zaštitni mehanizmi i samo uz prethodno odobrenje nadležnih tijela.
Those safeguards should be further specified so as to clearly define the conditions for their compliance.
Ti su zaštitni mehanizmi predviđeni člankom 29. stavkom 2. i člankom 34. stavkom 2.
It should be ensured that the application of such preferential rates does not endanger the liquidity soundness of the liquidity provider and that it effectively alleviates the compliance with the liquidity coverage ratio of the liquidity receiver.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 kao dodatni objektivni kriteriji koji moraju biti ispunjeni u kontekstu tih transakcija.
A low liquidity risk profile should be demonstrated by the credit institutions' compliance with the liquidity coverage ratio and any other liquidity-related supervisory requirements and measures applied pursuant to Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], together with the competent authorities' assessment, according to the latest supervisory review and evaluation process, that the institution's liquidity position poses a low level of risk, as objective references of their liquidity positions.
Ti bi se zaštitni mehanizmi trebali detaljnije odrediti kako bi se jasno definirali uvjeti za usklađenost s njima.
The effectiveness of the liquidity support within a group or an IPS on a cross-border basis should be guaranteed by a sound contractual framework evidenced by a legal opinion approved by the credit institutions' management body.
Trebalo bi osigurati da se primjenom povlaštenih stopa ne ugrožava likvidnosna stabilnost pružatelja likvidnosti i da se primatelju likvidnosti djelotvorno olakša usklađenost s koeficijentom likvidnosne pokrivenosti.
A minimum remaining maturity of the line should ensure that the commitment is not punctual for a specific transaction but durable over a minimum period of time.
Kreditne institucije trebale bi pokazati nizak profil likvidnosnog rizika svojom usklađenosti sa zahtjevom za koeficijent likvidnosne pokrivenosti ili bilo kojim drugim nadzornim zahtjevima i mjerama povezanima s likvidnosti koji se primjenjuju s skladu s glavom VII., poglavljem 2., odjeljcima III. i IV.
It should be ensured that the liquidity provider can provide the liquidity receiver with the necessary liquidity support in a timely manner, even in times of stress.
Direktive 2013/36/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3] te procjenom nadležnih tijela u skladu sa zadnjim postupkom nadzorne provjere i ocjene u kojoj je utvrđeno da likvidnosna pozicija institucije predstavlja nizak rizik, što su objektivni pokazatelji likvidnosnih pozicija institucija.
For these purposes, the liquidity provider should monitor the liquidity position of the liquidity receiver and any contingency funding plans of the liquidity provider and receiver should address the effects of applying a preferential outflow or inflow rate.
Djelotvornost prekogranične likvidnosne potpore unutar grupe ili institucionalnog sustava zaštite trebala bi se osigurati kvalitetnim ugovornim okvirom na temelju pravnog mišljenja koje je odobrilo upravljačko tijelo kreditnih institucija.
The conditions for compliance with the additional objective criteria set out in Article 29(2) and Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 should be aimed at providing sufficient ground to expect a higher than normal cross-border liquidity flows within a group or an IPS in stress while not hampering the efficiency and effectiveness of a model where the liquidity is normally centrally managed.
Minimalnim preostalim dospijećem linije trebalo bi osigurati da obveza trajanja ne bude ograničena na određenu transakciju, već da što kraće traje.
In certain specific cases of non-compliance with those conditions, namely where the liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the liquidity coverage ratio or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures, or where the remaining maturity of the liquidity or credit line falls below the prescribed minimum or a notice of cancellation of the line is given, the relevant competent authorities should reassess whether the application of preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rates may be continued with the aim of avoiding the unintended consequences that an automatic suspension of the preferential treatment might cause in terms of procyclical and contagion effects.
Trebalo bi osigurati da pružatelj likvidnosti može pravovremeno pružiti potrebnu likvidnosnu potporu primatelju likvidnosti čak i u razdoblju stresa.
The further specification of those additional objective criteria should not alter the responsibility of the credit institutions — as liquidity provider or liquidity receiver — to manage their liquidity risk on a prudent basis.
U tu bi svrhu pružatelj likvidnosti trebao pratiti likvidnosnu poziciju primatelja likvidnosti, a planom financiranja za nepredviđene situacije pružatelja i primatelja likvidnosti trebali bi se razmotriti učinci primjene povlaštene stope odljeva ili priljeva.
The further specification of those additional objective criteria should also be aimed at providing competent authorities with sufficient tools to determine the application of a preferential outflow or inflow rate.
Cilj bi uvjeta za usklađenost s dodatnim objektivnim kriterijima iz članka 29. stavka 2. i članka 34. stavka 2.
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by the European Banking Authority to the Commission.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 trebalo biti da se pruže dostatni razlozi da se u razdoblju stresa očekuje prekogranični likvidnosni tok unutar grupe ili institucionalnog sustava zaštite koji je viši od uobičajenog, a da se pritom ne ometa učinkovitost i djelotvornost modela u slučaju centraliziranog upravljanja likvidnosti.
The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010,
U određenim konkretnim slučajevima neispunjavanja tih uvjeta, odnosno kada pružatelj ili primatelj likvidnosti ne ispunjava zahtjev za koeficijent likvidnosne pokrivenosti ili bilo koji drugi nadzorni zahtjev ili mjeru ili se očekuje da ih neće ispuniti, ili kada je preostalo dospijeće likvidnosne ili kreditne linije kraće od propisane minimalne razine ili je poslana obavijest o opozivu linije, mjerodavna nadležna tijela trebala bi ponovno procijeniti može li se nastaviti primjena povlaštenih stopa likvidnosnih odljeva ili priljeva kako bi se izbjegle neželjene posljedice koje bi mogla prouzročiti automatska suspenzija povlaštenog tretmana u smislu procikličkih učinaka i učinaka širenja te pojave.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Detaljnijim određivanjem tih dodatnih objektivnih kriterija ne bi se trebala promijeniti odgovornost kreditnih institucija u okviru uloge pružatelja ili primatelja likvidnosti da razborito upravljaju svojim likvidnosnim rizikom.
Article 1
Detaljnijim određivanjem tih dodatnih objektivnih kriterija trebalo bi i nadležnim tijelima osigurati dostatne alate za određivanje primjene povlaštene stope odljeva ili priljeva.
Subject matter
Ova se Uredba temelji na nacrtu regulatornih tehničkih standarda koji je Komisiji dostavilo Europsko nadzorno tijelo za bankarstvo.
This Regulation further specifies the additional objective criteria laid down in Article 29(2) and Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 for the purposes of the application of the waiver set out therein.
Europsko nadzorno tijelo za bankarstvo provelo je otvoreno javno savjetovanje o nacrtu regulatornih tehničkih standarda na kojem se temelji ova Uredba, analiziralo moguće povezane troškove i koristi u skladu s člankom 10.
Article 2
Uredbe (EU) br. 1093/2010 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4] te zatražilo mišljenje Interesne skupine za bankarstvo osnovane u skladu s člankom 37.
Low liquidity risk profile of the liquidity provider and receiver
Uredbe (EU) br. 1093/2010,
The low liquidity risk profile referred to in point (a) of Article 29(2) and in point (a) of Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 shall satisfy the following conditions:
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
the liquidity provider and receiver have complied with the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio as set out in Articles 4 and 38 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, as well as any liquidity-related supervisory requirements or measures applied pursuant to Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU, on an on-going basis and for at least 12 months prior to the authorisation to apply the preferential outflow or inflow rate for undrawn credit or liquidity facilities pursuant to Article 29(1) and Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61;
Članak 1.
the liquidity provider and receiver's liquidity positions pose a low level of risk according to the latest supervisory review and evaluation process conducted in accordance with Title VII, Chapter 2, Section III of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Predmet
For the purposes of determining whether the condition referred to in point (a) of this paragraph is satisfied, the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio shall be calculated on the basis that the preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rate applied during the twelve month period referred to in that point.
Ovom se Uredbom detaljnije određuju dodatni objektivni kriteriji iz članka 29. stavka 2. i članka 34. stavka 2.
Where the liquidity provider or receiver has been granted permission from the relevant competent authorities to waive the condition set out in point (d) of Article 29(1) and point (d) of Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and a liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio set out in Articles 4 and 38 of that Delegated Regulation, or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures applied under Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU, it shall immediately notify the relevant competent authorities and include a description of the effects of such failure to meet that liquidity coverage ratio or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures on the corresponding preferential outflow or inflow rate applied to its counterparty.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 za potrebe primjene izuzeća koje je u tim člancima utvrđeno.
Where the liquidity provider or receiver has been granted permission from the relevant competent authorities to waive the condition set out in point (d) of Article 29(1) and point (d) of Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and a liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio set out in that Delegated Regulation, the notification referred to in paragraph 2 shall be included in the immediate notification and restoration plan required under Article 414 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Članak 2.
In the cases referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, the relevant competent authorities shall determine whether the preferential outflow or inflow rates continue to apply in accordance with the process referred to in point (b) of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Nizak profil likvidnosnog rizika pružatelja i primatelja likvidnosti
Article 3
Nizak profil likvidnosnog rizika iz članka 29. stavka 2. točke (a) i članka 34. stavka 2. točke (a) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 ispunjava sljedeće uvjete:
Legally binding agreements and commitments between the group entities regarding the undrawn credit or liquidity line
pružatelj ili primatelj likvidnosti poštuje propisanu razinu koeficijenta likvidnosne pokrivenosti iz članaka 4. i 38.
The legally binding agreements and commitments referred to in point (b) of Article 29(2) and in point (b) of Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 shall satisfy the following conditions:
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 i bilo koje druge nadzorne zahtjeve ili mjere povezane s likvidnosti koji se primjenjuju u skladu s glavom VII., poglavljem 2., odjeljcima III. i IV.
the credit or liquidity line is a committed line which is legally and practically available at any time, for the duration of the facility, even during a period of stress, on a cross-border basis.
Direktive 2013/36/EU kontinuirano i barem 12 mjeseci prije odobrenja za primjenu povlaštene stope odljeva ili priljeva za neiskorištene kreditne ili likvidnosne linije u skladu s člankom 29. stavkom 1. i člankom 34. stavkom 1.
It is specifically dedicated to the application of the preferential outflow or inflow rate provided for in Articles 29 and 34 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and available on demand.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61;
For these purposes, credit institutions have conducted sufficient legal review supported by a written and reasoned legal opinion approved by their management bodies, confirming the legal validity and enforceability of the credit or liquidity line agreement or commitment in all relevant jurisdictions;
likvidnosne pozicije pružatelja i primatelja likvidnosti prema zadnjem postupku nadzorne provjere i ocjene provedenim u skladu s glavom VII., poglavljem 2., odjeljkom III.
the currency denomination of the committed credit or liquidity line is consistent with the distribution by currency of the net liquidity outflows of the liquidity receiver that are unrelated to the line;
Direktive 2013/36/EU predstavljaju nisku razinu rizika.
the amount and the cost of the committed credit or liquidity line are clearly specified in the relevant contract;
Za potrebe utvrđivanja ispunjavanja uvjeta iz točke (a) ovog stavka propisana razina koeficijenta likvidnosne pokrivenosti izračunava se na temelju povlaštene stope likvidnosnih odljeva ili priljeva koja se primjenjuje u 12-mjesečnom razdoblju iz te točke.
the agreements and commitments do not contain any clause that would allow the liquidity provider to:
Ako su mjerodavna nadležna tijela pružatelju ili primatelju likvidnosti odobrila izuzeće od uvjeta iz članka 29. stavka 1. točke (d) i članka 34. stavka 1. točke (d) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61, a pružatelj ili primatelj likvidnosti ne ispunjava propisanu razinu koeficijenta likvidnosne pokrivenosti iz članaka 4. i 38. te Delegirane uredbe ili bilo koje druge nadzorne zahtjeve ili mjere povezane s likvidnosti koji se primjenjuju u skladu s glavom VII., poglavljem 2., odjeljcima III. i IV.
require any conditions to be fulfilled before the liquidity is provided;
Direktive 2013/36/EU ili se očekuje da ih neće ispuniti, pružatelj ili primatelj likvidnosti odmah o tome obavješćuje mjerodavna nadležna tijela i u okviru toga im dostavlja opis učinaka koje bi neispunjavanje koeficijenta likvidnosne pokrivenosti ili bilo kojeg drugog nadzornog zahtjeva ili mjere povezane s likvidnosti imalo na odgovarajuću povlaštenu stopu odljeva ili priljeva koja se primjenjuje na njegovu drugu ugovornu stranu.
withdraw from its obligations to fulfil these agreements and commitments;
Ako su mjerodavna nadležna tijela pružatelju ili primatelju likvidnosti odobrila izuzeće od uvjeta iz članka 29. stavka 1. točke (d) i članka 34. stavka 1. točke (d) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61, a pružatelj ili primatelj likvidnosti ne ispunjava propisanu razinu koeficijenta likvidnosne pokrivenosti utvrđenu tom Delegiranom uredbom, obavijest iz stavka 2. uključuje se u obavijest i plan za ponovnu usklađenost koji se u skladu s člankom 414.
change the terms of the agreements and commitments without prior approval from the relevant competent authorities;
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 dostavljaju bez odgode.