natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The existing deadline for sowing of catch crops and green cover laid down in Article 45(9) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 does not always fit with the agronomic and climatic conditions.
Zbog istih razloga navedenih u uvodnim izjavama (7) i (8) u vezi s člankom 45. stavkom 4.
With a view to better achieving the environmental objectives of this ecological focus area type, it is appropriate to replace the deadline for sowing of catch crops and green cover with a minimum period of time during which areas under catch crops and green cover have to be in place.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014, rubovi polja, trenutačno navedeni u točki (e) te odredbe, trebali bi se spojiti s graničnim pojasevima u članku 45. stavku 5. te Uredbe te bi trebalo odrediti jedinstveno ograničenje dimenzija u odnosu na granične pojaseve i rubove polja.
In order to provide the necessary flexibility to take into account seasonal weather conditions, Member States should be allowed to fix that period at the most appropriate geographical level.
Takve najveće dimenzije u odnosu na granične pojaseve i rubove polja trebale bi se odnositi na površinu koja se može smatrati graničnim pojasevima i rubovima polja u skladu s člankom 45. stavkom 5.
However, since the permanence of catch crops and green cover on the ground is a key factor in ensuring an effective take up of residual nitrate and coverage of soil while the area is not covered by the main crop, the minimum length of the period should be set at Union level.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014.
In order to be consistent with the interpretation provided on the definition of grasses or other herbaceous forage laid down in Article 4(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, under-sowing leguminous crops in the main crop should also be possible.
Kako bi se poljoprivrednicima osigurala maksimalna fleksibilnost, definiciju graničnih pojaseva u okviru GAEC 1, SMR 1 ili SMR 10 kako je navedeno u Prilogu II.
Furthermore, in order to ensure consistency between equivalent practices covered by commitments and certification schemes as referred to in Article 43(3)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, respectively, rules on qualifying catch crops or green cover as ecological focus areas should be aligned.
Uredbi (EU) br. 1306/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [6] te rubova polja zaštićenih u okviru GAEC 7, SMR 2 ili SMR 3 kako je navedeno u tom Prilogu, trebalo bi dopuniti drugim graničnim pojasevima i rubovima polja, odnosno svim vrstama pojasa koji nisu obuhvaćeni tim dvjema kategorijama iz pravila o višestrukoj sukladnosti.
Even if, as a general rule only areas with nitrogen-fixing crops grown as pure species should be qualified as ecological focus areas, given that in traditional cultivation practices such crops are often mixed with other crops, it is appropriate to allow, under Article 45(10) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, that areas with mixtures may also be qualified as ecological focus areas provided that the predominance of the nitrogen-fixing crops in such mixtures is ensured.
U skladu s člankom 46. stavkom 2. drugim podstavkom Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013 dopušteno je obilježja krajobraza i granične pojaseve pokraj obradivog zemljišta smatrati ekološki značajnim površinama.
In addition, based on the experience with the application of the first subparagraph of Article 45(10) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 and in light of the implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC [7] and Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8], it is superfluous to prescribe specific rules on the location of these nitrogen-fixing crops.
Kako bi se što više iskoristile ekološke koristi obilježja krajobraza i graničnih pojaseva iz članka 45. stavaka 4. i 5.
Instead, and with a view to strengthening Member States efforts to address the risk of nitrogen leaching in the autumn, Member States should be allowed to establish additional conditions on nitrogen-fixing crops if necessary.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 te potaknula zaštita i održavanje dodatnih elemenata, tu bi odredbu trebalo dopuniti pravilima koja pružaju fleksibilnost, uzimajući u obzir druge ekološki vrijedne elemente koji udovoljavaju definiciji tih vrsta ekološki značajne površine i koji nisu pokraj obradivog zemljišta poljoprivrednoga gospodarstva.
Furthermore, in order to ensure consistency between equivalent practices covered by commitments and certification schemes as referred to in Article 43(3)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, respectively, rules on qualifying nitrogen-fixing crops as ecological focus area should be aligned.
Stoga, ako se takav granični pojas i rub polja ili obilježje krajobraza nalazi pokraj ekološki značajne površine koja je izravno pokraj obradivog zemljišta poljoprivrednoga gospodarstva, trebalo bi ga također priznati kao ekološki značajnu površinu.
Experience with the application of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 has proven that certain provisions relating to the ecological focus area types need to be more detailed as regards the requirement of ‘no production’ including the rules on cutting and grazing with a view to meeting the objective of biodiversity and to ensuring consistency with other instruments of the common agricultural policy.
Zbog istih razloga navedenih u uvodnim izjavama (7) i (8) u vezi s člankom 45. stavkom 4.
In particular, as regards the ‘no agricultural production’ requirement applicable to the ecological focus area types referred to in Article 45(2), (4)(e), (5) and (7) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, it should be clarified that production should be understood as agricultural activity in the meaning of Article 4(1)(c)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, and not in the broader sense of Article 4(1)(c)(ii) and (iii) of the same Regulation, and should not affect the rules on minimum soil cover under GAEC 4 as referred to in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014, najveće dimenzije utvrđene u pogledu pojaseva prihvatljivih hektara duž rubova šuma iz članka 45. stavka 7. te Uredbe trebale bi se odnositi na površinu koja se može smatrati takvim pojasom u skladu s tom odredbom.
In addition, undertaking actions by farmers, in particular, by facilitating pollination, in order to safeguard and improve biodiversity, aiming at establishing a green soil cover and which are, for instance, covered by an agri-environment-climate commitment, should be incentivised to maximise the environmental benefits.
U svjetlu odredaba članka 46. stavka 2. točke (g) prvog podstavka Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013 primjereno je pojasniti da je određivanje zahtjeva u pogledu uporabe mineralnih gnojiva i/ili sredstava za zaštitu bilja relevantno samo ako su ti ulazni proizvodi odobreni.
Given that the three main types of areas declared by farmers as ecological focus areas in the first year of implementation of Article 46 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 are areas which are, or may be, productive, namely land lying fallow, catch crops or green cover and nitrogen-fixing crops, plant production products are likely to be used in ecological focus areas.
Postojeći rok za sjetvu postrnih usjeva i zelenog pokrova utvrđen u članku 45. stavku 9.
Therefore, in order to safeguard and improve biodiversity in line with the objectives of ‘greening’, it is appropriate to ban the use of plant protection products on the following ecological focus areas which are or may be productive: land lying fallow, strips of eligible hectares along forest edges with production, catch crops or green cover and nitrogen-fixing crops.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 nije uvijek u skladu s agronomskim i klimatskim uvjetima.
Where catch crops or green cover is established by under-sowing grass or leguminous crops in the main crop, in order to avoid, for proportionality reasons, consequences for the management of the main crop, such a ban should apply from the moment of the harvesting of the main crop.
Radi boljeg ostvarenja ekoloških ciljeva te vrste ekološki značajne površine primjereno je zamijeniti rok za sjetvu postrnih usjeva i zelenog pokrova minimalnim razdobljem tijekom kojeg moraju postojati površine pod postrnim usjevima i zelenim pokrovom.
In order to ensure consistency of the ban with the usual agronomic practices, ensure legal certainty and avoid administrative difficulties for farmers and national administrations it should be specified that the ban for under-sowing should apply for at least a minimum period, equal to the minimum period during which areas under catch crops or green cover have to be in place when established by sowing a mixture of crop species, or until the sowing of the next main crop.
Kako bi se omogućila potrebna fleksibilnost radi uzimanja u obzir sezonskih vremenskih uvjeta, trebalo bi dopustiti državama članicama da odrede to razdoblje na najprimjerenijoj zemljopisnoj razini.
Article 49 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 lays down the rules under which legal persons have access to the payment for young farmers provided for in Article 50(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013.
Međutim, budući da je trajanje postrnih usjeva i zelenog pokrova na terenu ključni čimbenik za osiguravanje učinkovitog preuzimanja preostalih nitrata i pokrivenosti tla dok površina nije pokrivena glavnim usjevom, najmanju dužinu razdoblja trebalo bi utvrditi na razini Unije.
On the basis of the experience gained with the application of Article 49(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, a further clarification should be provided as to the interpretation of the requirement laid down in point (b) of Article 50(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 in respect of the time when a young farmer who exercises effective and long-term control over a legal person has to comply with the age limit.
Radi usklađenosti s tumačenjem definicije trave ili druge travolike paše iz članka 4. stavka 1. točke i.
In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that the young farmer has to comply with the age limit of 40 years in the year of the first submission of an application under the basic payment scheme or the single area payment scheme by the legal person with a young farmer in control.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013 trebalo bi omogućiti i podusjev mahunastih usjeva u glavnom usjevu.
According to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, the per unit amount of voluntary coupled support results from the ratio between the amount fixed for the financing of the relevant measure and either the quantitative limit fixed pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(2), or the number of hectares or animals that are eligible for the support in the year in question.
Nadalje, kako bi se osigurala dosljednost među istovrijednim praksama obuhvaćenima obvezama i programima certificiranja iz članka 43. stavka 3. točke (a) odnosno točke (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013, trebalo bi uskladiti pravila o postrnim usjevima ili zelenom pokrovu koji ispunjavaju uvjete za ekološki značajnu površinu.
It is appropriate to reformulate that provision in such a way that Member States may fix the per unit amount at a value within the range between those two values where the number of eligible units is lower than the quantitative limit.
Čak i kada bi se, kao opće pravilo, samo površine s usjevima koji vežu dušik i koji se uzgajaju kao čiste vrste smatrale ekološki značajnim površinama te budući da se u okviru tradicionalnih načina uzgoja takvi usjevi često miješaju s drugim usjevima, primjereno je dopustiti da se, u skladu s člankom 45. stavkom 10.
Pursuant to Article 64(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, Member States applying the single area payment scheme in accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 are to notify the Commission by 1 September each year of the total number of hectares declared by farmers under that scheme.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014, i površine s mješavinama smatraju ekološki značajnim površinama uz uvjet da je osigurano da u takvim mješavinama prevladavaju usjevi koji vežu dušik.
However, that information is notified to the Commission annually in more detail pursuant to Article 9(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Osim toga, na temelju iskustva s primjenom prvog podstavka članka 45. stavka 10.
Article 64(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 can therefore be deleted.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 i u svjetlu provedbe Direktive Vijeća 91/676/EEZ [7] i Direktive 2000/60/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [8], suvišno je propisivati posebna pravila o lokaciji tih usjeva koji vežu dušik.
Based on the Commission's experience with the management of the notifications relating to greening pursuant to Article 65 to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, some adjustments should be made as regards their content, including with respect to greening provisions of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 as amended by this Regulation.
Umjesto toga i u cilju jačanja napora država članica da riješe rizik od otjecanja dušika u jesen, državama članicama trebalo bi dopustiti da, prema potrebi, utvrde dodatne uvjete u pogledu usjeva koji vežu dušik.
In accordance with Article 67(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, Member States are to notify the Commission of the total number of beneficiaries, the amount of the payments which have been granted as well as the total area and the total number of animals for which the support has actually been paid for each coupled support measure and each of the specific types of farming or specific agricultural sectors concerned.
Nadalje, kako bi se osigurala dosljednost među istovrijednim praksama obuhvaćenima obvezama i programima certificiranja iz članka 43. stavka 3. točke (a) odnosno točke (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013, trebalo bi uskladiti pravila o ispunjavaju uvjeta za ekološki značajnu površinu za usjeve koji vežu dušik.
As from claim year 2015, the total number of beneficiaries and the total area or total number of animals claimed and determined for each voluntary coupled support measure are notified by Member States in accordance with Article 9(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Iskustvo u primjeni Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 pokazalo je da određene odredbe o vrstama ekološki značajnih površina trebaju biti detaljnije u pogledu zahtjeva za „nikakvu proizvodnju”, uključujući pravila o košnji i ispaši, kako bi se ispunio cilj bioraznolikosti i osigurala usklađenost s ostalim instrumentima zajedničke poljoprivredne politike.
Furthermore, as from claim year 2016, the amount of the payments which have been granted for each coupled support measure will be included in the communications of information by the Member States in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 [9].
Konkretno, u pogledu zahtjeva „da nema poljoprivredne proizvodnje”, koji se primjenjuje na vrste ekološki značajnih površina iz članka 45. stavka 2., članka 45. stavka 4. točke (e), članka 45. stavaka 5. i 7.
Therefore, Article 67(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 should be deleted.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014, potrebno je pojasniti da bi proizvodnju trebalo tumačiti kao poljoprivrednu djelatnost u smislu članka 4. stavka 1. točke (c) podtočke i.
Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013, a ne u širem smislu članka 4. stavka 1. točke (c) podtočaka ii. i iii. iste uredbe te da ne bi trebalo utjecati na pravila o minimalnom zemljišnom pokrovu u okviru GAEC 4 iz Priloga II.
As a consequence of the amendment of certain provisions of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 concerning the ecological focus area types, changes to Annex X to Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 need to be made, in particular by adapting the list of ecological focus area types and the corresponding factors, where necessary.
Uredbi (EU) br. 1306/2013.
Recital 45 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 emphasises the importance of ecological focus areas to be established in a coherent way.
Osim toga, kako bi se povećale koristi za okoliš, trebalo bi poticati djelovanja poljoprivrednika koja su, primjerice, obuhvaćena poljoprivredno-okolišno-klimatskom obvezom, a posebno olakšavanje oprašivanja, radi zaštite i unapređenja bioraznolikosti u cilju stvaranja zelenog zemljišnog pokrova.
Therefore, conversion and weighting factors applicable to equivalent practices have to be consistent with the factors applicable to similar or identical standard practices.
Budući da su tri glavne vrste površina koje su poljoprivrednici prijavili kao ekološki značajne površine u prvoj godini provedbe članka 46.
In the interest of legal certainty and equal treatment between farmers, Annex X to Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 should be amended accordingly.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013 površine koje se upotrebljavaju ili bi se mogle upotrebljavati za proizvodnju, odnosno zemlja na ugaru, postrni usjevi ili zeleni pokrov te usjevi koji vežu dušik, na ekološki značajnim površinama vjerojatno će se upotrebljavati sredstva za zaštitu bilja.
This Regulation should enter into force on the third day after its publication.
Stoga je radi zaštite i unapređenja bioraznolikosti u skladu s ciljem „ekologizacije” primjereno zabraniti upotrebu sredstava za zaštitu bilja na sljedećim ekološki značajnim površinama koje se upotrebljavaju ili bi se mogle upotrebljavati za proizvodnju: zemlja na ugaru, pojasevi prihvatljivih hektara duž rubova šuma s proizvodnjom, postrni usjevi ili zeleni pokrov te usjevi koji vežu dušik.
However, as the clarification of Article 49(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 and the reformulation of the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of that Regulation reflect an interpretation given to those provisions since the application of that Regulation, it is appropriate that those amendments apply retroactively.
U slučaju da se postrni usjevi ili zeleni pokrov dobivaju podusjevom trave ili mahunastih usjeva u glavnom usjevu, ta bi se zabrana trebala primjenjivati od trenutka žetve glavnog usjeva kako bi se iz razloga proporcionalnosti izbjegle posljedice za upravljanje glavnim usjevom.
Considering the time necessary for the national authorities to update their existing administrative tools and to inform farmers sufficiently in advance of the amendments of the greening provisions made by this Regulation, those amendments should only apply with respect to aid applications relating to calendar years starting as from 1 January 2018.
Kako bi se osigurala usklađenost zabrane s uobičajenim poljoprivrednim praksama i pravna sigurnosti te izbjegle administrativne poteškoće za poljoprivrednike i nacionalne uprave, trebalo bi utvrditi da bi se zabrana u pogledu podusjeva trebala primjenjivati barem tijekom minimalnog razdoblja koje odgovara minimalnom razdoblju tijekom kojeg moraju postojati površine pod postrnim usjevima i zelenim pokrovom uspostavljene sjetvom mješavine vrsta usjeva ili do sjetve sljedećeg glavnog usjeva.
However, Member States should be given the possibility to apply them with respect to aid applications relating to calendar year 2017 while bearing in mind that any choices in this regard should be coherent from the perspective of farmers.
Člankom 49.
A notification obligation as regards consequential changes to previous notifications relating to that calendar year should be provided for,
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 utvrđuju se pravila na temelju kojih se pravnim osobama omogućuje pristup plaćanju za mlade poljoprivrednike iz članka 50. stavka 1.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013.
Article 1
Na temelju iskustva stečenog primjenom članka 49. stavka 3.
Amendment of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 trebalo bi dodatno pojasniti tumačenje zahtjeva iz članka 50. stavka 2. točke (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013 u pogledu razdoblja u kojem mladi poljoprivrednik koji vrši stvarnu i dugoročnu kontrolu nad pravnom osobom mora udovoljavati dobnoj granici.
Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 is amended as follows:
Konkretno, primjereno je pojasniti da mladi poljoprivrednik mora udovoljavati dobnoj granici od 40 godina u godini u kojoj pravna osoba koju kontrolira mladi poljoprivrednik prvi put podnosi zahtjev u okviru programa osnovnih plaćanja ili programa jedinstvenih plaćanja po površini.
Article 9 is replaced by the following:
U skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 2. drugim podstavkom Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 jedinični iznos potpore dobrovoljnih proizvodno vezanih potpora proizlazi iz omjera između utvrđenog iznosa za financiranje relevantne mjere i količinskog ograničenja utvrđenog u skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 2. prvim podstavkom ili broja hektara ili životinja prihvatljivih za potporu u predmetnoj godini.
‘Article 9
Primjereno je preoblikovati tu odredbu tako da države članice mogu utvrditi jedinični iznos potpore na vrijednost unutar raspona između te dvije vrijednosti u slučaju da je broj prihvatljivih jedinica niži od količinskog ograničenja.
Hemp
U skladu s člankom 64. stavkom 5.
For the purposes of Article 32(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, the eligibility of areas used for the production of hemp shall be subject to the use of seed of the varieties listed in the “Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species” on 15 March of the year in respect of which the payment is granted and published in accordance with Article 17 of Council Directive 2002/53/EC.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 države članice koje primjenjuju program jedinstvenih plaćanja po površini u skladu s člankom 36.
The seed shall be certified in accordance with Council Directive 2002/57/EC.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1307/2013 moraju do 1. rujna svake godine obavijestiti Komisiju o ukupnom broju hektara koji su poljoprivrednici prijavili u okviru tog programa.
Member States shall establish the system for determining the Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol content (hereinafter referred to as “THC content”) in hemp varieties, which allows them to apply the method set out in Annex III.
Međutim te se informacije Komisiji svake godine detaljnije dostavljaju u skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 1.
The competent authority of the Member State shall keep the records related to findings on the THC content.
Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 809/2014.
Such records shall comprise for each variety at least the results in terms of THC content from each sample expressed in percentage to two decimal places, the procedure used, the number of tests carried out, an indication of the point at which the sample was taken and measures taken at national level.
Članak 64. stavak 5.
If an average of all the samples of a given variety exceeds the THC content as laid down in Article 32(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, Member States shall use procedure B as described in Annex III to this Regulation for the variety concerned in the course of the following claim year.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 639/2014 stoga se može izbrisati.
That procedure shall be used in the course of the next claim years unless all the analytical results for the given variety are below the THC content as laid down in Article 32(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013.
Na temelju Komisijina iskustva u upravljanju obavijestima koje se odnose na ekologizaciju u skladu s člankom 65.
If for the second year the average of all the samples of a given variety exceeds the THC content as laid down in Article 32(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, the Member State shall notify the Commission of the request for authorisation to prohibit the marketing of such variety in accordance with Article 18 of Directive 2002/53/EC.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 trebalo bi izvršiti određene prilagodbe u pogledu njihova sadržaja, uključujući s obzirom na odredbe o ekologizaciji iz Delegirane uredbe (EU) br. 639/2014 kako je izmijenjena ovom Uredbom.
Such notification shall be sent in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 792/2009 by 15 January of the following claim year at the latest.
U skladu s člankom 67. stavkom 2.