natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Accordingly, there is no obligation on the Union institutions to prove that the exporter does not satisfy the conditions laid down for the recognition of such status.
Točnije, Komisija je utvrdila da neki predmetni proizvođači izvoznici (trgovačka društva 28., 29., 31. i 32.) ne mogu slobodno odrediti svoje prodajne količine za domaća i izvozna tržišta.
On the contrary, it is for the Union institutions to assess whether the evidence supplied by the exporter concerned is sufficient to show that the criteria laid down in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation prior to its amendment are fulfilled in order to grant IT.
U tom pogledu, Komisija je utvrdila da postoje ograničenja u pogledu proizvodnje i/ili ograničenje količina prodanih na posebnim tržištima (domaća i izvozna).
In accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation prior to its amendment, exporters should demonstrate on the basis of a properly substantiated claim that all five criteria listed therein are met so that they can be granted IT.
Nadalje, ni jedan predmetni proizvođač izvoznik nije dostavio bitne i potpune podatke (npr. dokaze o strukturi i kapitalu društva, dokaze ili objašnjenja o postupcima donošenja odluka u društvu, dokaze o troškovima struje ili engleske verzije statuta) kako bi dokazali da se njihove poslovne odluke donose kao odgovor na tržišne signale, a bez znatnog uplitanja države.
Therefore, the Commission considered that the failure to meet at least one criterion was enough to reject the IT claim.
U pogledu kriterija 2 (računovodstvo), ni jedan od sedam predmetnih proizvođača izvoznika nije uspio dokazati da su skup osnovnih računovodstvenih podataka revidirali nezavisni revizori u skladu s međunarodnim računovodstvenim standardima.
The five criteria are the following:
U tom pogledu, procjenom za trgovačka društva 27, 28, 29, 31, utvrđeno je da su njihovi računi bili u suprotnosti s međunarodnim računovodstvenim standardima, kao što je nedostatak podataka o najmu zgrada ili netočno izvješćivanje o pravu na korištenje zemljišta ili upotrebi fiksnog tečaja.
in the case of wholly or partly foreign owned firms or joint ventures, exporters are free to repatriate capital and profits;
Za trgovačka društva 27., 28., 30. i 32.
export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale are freely determined;
Komisija je utvrdila nedosljednosti između podataka iz zahtjeva za MET i popratne dokumentacije (tj. platna bilanca).
the majority of the shares belong to private persons; state officials appearing on the board of directors or holding key management positions shall either be in minority or it must be demonstrated that the company is nonetheless sufficiently independent from State interference;
Trgovačko društvo 26 Komisiji je dostavilo mišljenje/izvješće neovisnog revizora i financijske izvještaje samo na vijetnamskom jeziku te je propustilo dostaviti njihov prijevod na engleski jezik.
exchange rate conversions are carried out at the market rate; and
U pogledu kriterija 3 (imovina i prenošenje), trgovačka društva 26., 27., 28., 29., 30., 31. i 32. nisu uspjela dokazati da iz prethodnog sustava bez tržišnoga gospodarstva nisu prenijela nikakve poremećaje.
State interference is not such as to permit circumvention of measures if individual exporters are given different rates of duty.
Konkretno, ta trgovačka društva nisu dostavila bitne i potpune informacije, među ostalim, o imovini u vlasništvu društva, o uvjetima i vrijednosti prava upotrebe zemljišta, odstupanju od standardnih poreznih stopa, politici zapošljavanja u trgovačkom društvu, poreznim stopama ili dobavljačima i cijenama električne energije.
All seven exporting producers concerned claimed IT in the event that they would not be granted MET.
Trgovačko društvo 27. nije uspjelo dokazati da ispunjava kriterij 4 (pravno okruženje).
Therefore, the Commission also assessed whether IT should be granted to these exporting producers, in addition to rejecting their MET claims as described in recitals (37) to (44) above.
Konkretno, iako je to trgovačko društvo bilo u stanju insolventnosti prema bilanci, to nije objavljeno u financijskim izvještajima ili revizorskom izvješću.
Regarding criterion 1 (Repatriation of capital and profits), Company 30 failed to demonstrate that it was free to repatriate capital and profits and did thus not demonstrate that this criterion was fulfilled.
To trgovačko društvo stoga nije uspjelo dokazati da posluje u skladu sa zakonima o stečaju i imovini kojima se jamči pravna sigurnost i stabilnost.
With regard to criterion 2 (Export sales and prices freely determined), the Commission concluded that Companies 29, 31 and 32 had failed to prove that business decisions such as export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale were freely determined in response to market signals, as the evidence analysed, such as articles of association or business licences, showed a limitation in output and/or on the sales quantities of footwear in specific markets.
Trgovačko društvo 29. nije uspjelo dokazati da ispunjava kriterij 5 („razmjena valuta”) s obzirom na to da se, u skladu s napomenama uz financijske izvještaje, to trgovačko društvo koristilo fiksnim tečajem za stranu valutu, što nije u skladu s kriterijem 5 kojim se utvrđuje da se konverzija valuta obavlja po tržišnim stopama.
As regards criterion 3 (Company — key management and shares — is sufficiently independent from State interference), the Commission concluded that Companies 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 failed to provide the necessary information to demonstrate that they were sufficiently independent from State interference.
Komisija je predmetne proizvođače izvoznike obavijestila o tome da ni jednom od njih ne bi trebalo odobriti MET te ih je pozvala da dostave primjedbe.
Inter alia, no information or insufficient information was provided as regards the ownership structure of the company and how the decisions were taken (Companies 27, 28, 29, 30), on how the land use right were transferred to these companies and at what terms and conditions (Companies 28, 29 and 31).
Nisu zaprimljene nikakve primjedbe.
Company 26 also provided only a Vietnamese version of the Articles of Association and failed to provide an English translation thereof.
Stoga ni jedan od sedam predmetnih proizvođača izvoznika nije ispunio sve uvjete određene člankom 2. stavkom 7. točkom (c) Osnovne uredbe, zbog čega se ni jednom od njih ne odobrava MET.
In addition, Companies 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 also failed to prove that they fulfilled the requirements of criterion 5 (Circumvention) on the basis that no information was provided as to how decisions were taken within the company and whether the State exerted significant influence in this decision making of the company.
D OCJENA ZAHTJEVA ZA IT
Finally, for Company 29 exchange rate conversions were not carried out at the market rate, but at a fixed rate as mentioned in recital (43) above.
U skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 5.
Therefore, it did not fulfil the requirements of criterion 4 (Market based exchange rate).
Osnovne uredbe prije izmjena, u slučajevima u kojima se primjenjuje članak 2. stavak 7. točka (a) te Uredbe, odredit će se pojedinačna pristojba za izvoznike koji mogu dokazati da ispunjuju sve kriterije iz članka 9. stavka 5.
In light of the above, none of the seven exporting producers concerned fulfilled the conditions set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation prior to its amendment and IT was therefore denied to all of them.
Osnovne uredbe prije izmjena.
The Commission informed the exporting producers concerned accordingly and invited them to provide comments.
Kao što je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 37., nužno je istaknuti da je teret dokazivanja na proizvođaču koji želi da mu se, na temelju članka 9. stavka 5.
The residual anti-dumping duty applicable to China and Vietnam, of 16,5 % and 10 % respectively, should therefore be imposed for exports made by the seven exporting producers concerned for the period of application of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006.
Osnovne uredbe prije izmjena, odobri IT.
The period of application of that regulation was initially from 7 October 2006 until 7 October 2008.
Stoga se člankom 9. stavkom 5. prvim podstavkom Osnovne uredbe prije izmjene predviđa da zahtjev mora biti propisno obrazložen.
Following the initiation of an expiry review, it was prolonged on 30 December 2009 until 31 March 2011.
U skladu s tim institucije Unije nemaju nikakvu obvezu dokazati da izvoznik ne zadovoljava uvjete utvrđene za priznavanje tog statusa.
The illegality identified in the judgments is that the Union institutions failed to establish whether the products produced by the exporting producers concerned should be subject to the residual duty or to an individual duty.
Naprotiv, institucije Unije trebaju ocijeniti jesu li dokazi koje je dostavio predmetni izvoznik dostatni da se pokaže da su kriteriji određeni člankom 9. stavkom 5.
On the basis of the illegality identified by the Court, there is no legal ground for completely exempting the products produced by the exporting producers concerned from paying any anti-dumping duty.
Osnovne uredbe prije njezine izmjene ispunjeni kako bi se tom izvozniku odobrio IT.
A new act remedying the illegality identified by the Court therefore only needs to reassess the applicable anti-dumping duty rate, and not the measures themselves.
U skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 5.
Since it is concluded that the residual duty applicable to China and Vietnam respectively should be re-imposed in respect of the exporting producers concerned at the same rate as originally imposed by the contested Regulation and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009, no changes are required to Regulation (EC) No 388/2008.
Osnovne uredbe prije izmjena izvoznici bi trebali na temelju propisno obrazloženog zahtjeva dokazati da je ispunjeno svih pet kriterija iz tog članka kako bi im se odobrio IT.
That latter regulation remains valid.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da se zahtjev za IT može odbiti i ako nije ispunjen najmanje jedan kriterij.
E. COMMENTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES AFTER DISCLOSURE
Riječ je o sljedećih pet kriterija:
Following disclosure, the Commission received comments on behalf of FESI and the Footwear Coalition representing importers of footwear in the Union.
da u slučaju poduzeća ili zajedničkih pothvata koji su u cijelosti ili djelomično u stranom vlasništvu izvoznici mogu slobodno repatrirati kapital i dobit;
Procedural requirements when assessing MET and IT claim forms
izvozne cijene i količine, kao i uvjeti i odredbe prodaje utvrđuju se slobodno;
FESI and the Footwear Coalition claimed that the burden of proof when assessing MET/IT claims lies with the Commission, as the Chinese and Vietnamese exporting producers had discharged the burden by submitting the MET/IT claims in the original investigation.
većina dionica pripada pojedincima; državni dužnosnici u upravnom odboru ili koji su na ključnim upravljačkim pozicijama u manjini su ili moraju dokazati da je društvo ipak dovoljno nezavisno od uplitanja države;
FESI and the Footwear Coalition also claimed that the same procedural rights should have been granted to the exporting producers concerned by the current implementation as those granted to the sampled exporting producers during the original investigation.
konverzija valuta obavlja se po tržišnim stopama; i
FESI and the Footwear Coalition argued in particular, that only a desk analysis had been carried out rather than on-the-spot verification visits, and that the Chinese and Vietnamese exporting producers were not provided any opportunity to complement their MET/IT claim forms via deficiency letters.
uplitanje države nije toliko da bi omogućilo izbjegavanje mjera ako bi se pojedinačnim izvoznicima odredile različite stope pristojbe.
FESI and the Footwear Coalition further argued that the exporting producers concerned by this implementation were not provided with the same procedural guarantees than those applied in standard anti-dumping investigations, but stricter standards were applied.
Svih sedam predmetnih proizvođača izvoznika koji su zatražili MET zatražili su i IT u slučaju da im se ne odobri MET.
FESI and the Footwear Coalition claimed that the Commission has not taken into account the time lag between the filing of the MET/IT request in the original investigation and the assessment of these claims.
Stoga Komisija također procjenjuje bi li se za te proizvođače izvoznike trebali dodijeliti IT-ovi uz odbijanje njihovih zahtjeva za MET, kako je opisano u uvodnim izjavama 37. do 44.
In addition, exporting producers during the original investigation were only provided 15 days in order to fill in the MET/IT requests, instead of the usual 21 days.
U pogledu kriterija 1 (repatrijacija kapitala i dobiti), trgovačko društvo 30. nije uspjelo dokazati da su slobodno repatrirali kapital i dobit te stoga nisu dokazala da je taj kriterij ispunjen.
On this basis, FESI and the Footwear Coalition claimed that the fundamental legal principle of granting interested parties full opportunity to exercise their rights of defence laid down in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, was not respected.
U pogledu kriterija 2 (slobodno utvrđivanje izvozne prodaje i izvoznih cijena), Komisija je zaključila da društva 29., 31. i 32. nisu uspjela dokazati da se poslovne odluke, primjerice izvozne cijene i količine te uvjeti i odredbe prodaje utvrđuju slobodno, kao odgovor na tržišne signale, jer je na temelju analiziranih dokaza, primjerice statuta ili dozvole za obavljanje poslovne djelatnosti, uočeno ograničenje proizvodnje i/ili prodajnih količina obuće na određenim tržištima.
On this basis, it was argued that by not giving the exporting producers the opportunity to complete incomplete information the Commission misused its powers and effectively reversed the burden of proof at the stage of the implementation.
U pogledu kriterija 3 (društvo – ključna uprava i dionice – dovoljno je neovisno o uplitanju države), Komisija je zaključila da trgovačka društva 26., 27., 28., 29., 30. i 31. nisu dostavila potrebne podatke kojima dokazuju da su dovoljno neovisna o uplitanju države.
Finally, FESI and the Footwear Coalition also claimed that this approach would be discriminatory vis-à-vis the Chinese and Vietnamese exporting producers that were sampled in the original investigation, but also other exporting producers in non-market economy countries that were subject to an anti-dumping investigation and filed MET/IT claims in that investigation.
Među ostalim, nisu dostavljeni podaci ili nije dostavljeno dovoljno podataka u pogledu vlasničke strukture društava i o tome kako se donose odluke (trgovačka društva 27., 28., 29., 30.), o pravu na korištenje zemljišta prenesenom na ta društva i pod kojim uvjetima (društva 28., 29. i 31.).
Thus, the Chinese and Vietnamese companies concerned by the current implementation should not be made subject to the same information provision threshold as applied in a normal 15-month investigation and should not be subject to stricter procedural standards.
Trgovačko društvo 26. poslalo je verziju statuta samo na vijetnamskom jeziku i propustilo dostaviti njegov prijevod na engleski jezik.
FESI and the Footwear Coalition also claimed that the Commission applied de facto facts available within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, while the Commission did not comply with the procedural rules set out in Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation.
Osim toga, društva 26., 27., 28., 29. i 30. nisu uspjela dokazati da su ispunila zahtjeve kriterija 5 (izbjegavanje) na temelju činjenice da nisu dostavila podatke o načinu donošenja odluka u društvu ni o tome je li država imala znatan utjecaj u tom donošenju odluke od strane društva.
The Commission recalls that according to the case-law, the burden of proof lies with the producer wishing to claim MET/IT under Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Konačno, za trgovačko društvo 29. konverzija valuta nije obavljena po tržišnim stopama, nego po fiksnoj stopi kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 43.
Accordingly, as held by the Court in the judgments in Brosmann and Aokang, there is no obligation on the institutions to prove that the producer does not satisfy the conditions laid down for the recognition of such status.
Stoga nije ispunilo zahtjeve kriterija 4 (konverzija valuta na temelju tržišta).
On the contrary, it is for the Commission to assess whether the evidence supplied by the producer concerned is sufficient to show that the criteria laid down in the first subparagraph of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation are fulfilled in order to grant it MET/IT (see recital (48)).
U kontekstu navedenog, ni jedan od sedam predmetnih kineskih proizvođača izvoznika nije ispunio uvjete određene člankom 9. stavkom 5.
In that regard, it is recalled that there is no obligation for the Commission contained in the basic Regulation or in the case-law to give the possibility of the exporting producer to complement the MET/IT claim with all missing factual information.
Osnovne uredbe prije njezine izmjene, zbog čega se ni jednom od njih ne odobrava IT.
The Commission may base its assessment on the information submitted by the exporting producer.
Komisija je o tome obavijestila predmetne proizvođače izvoznike te ih je pozvala da dostave primjedbe.
In relation to the argument that only a desk analysis was carried out, the Commission notes that a desk analysis is a procedure whereby the requests for MET/IT are analysed on the basis of the documents submitted by the exporting producer.
Na temelju nezakonitosti koju je Sud utvrdio ne postoji pravni temelj za potpuno izuzeće proizvoda koje proizvode predmetni proizvođači izvoznici od plaćanja bilo kakve antidampinške pristojbe.
All MET/IT applications are subject to a desk analysis by the Commission.
Novim aktom kojim bi se otklonila nezakonitost koju je Sud utvrdio stoga je potrebno ponovno ocijeniti jedino primjenjivu stopu antidampinške pristojbe, a ne i same mjere.
In addition, the Commission may decide to carry out on-site verification visits.
Budući da je zaključeno da je potrebno ponovno uvesti preostalu pristojbu koja se primjenjuje na Kinu odnosno Vijetnam u pogledu predmetnih proizvođača izvoznika po istoj stopi po kojoj je na početku uvedena Spornom uredbom i Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 1294/2009, nisu potrebne izmjene Uredbe (EZ) br. 388/2008.
On-site verifications visits are, however, not required, nor are they carried out for every application for MET/IT.
Ta Uredba ostaje valjana.
On-site inspections, where they are carried out, usually have as their purpose to confirm a certain preliminary assessment made by the institutions and/or to check the veracity of the information provided by the exporting producer concerned.
E PRIMJEDBE ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANA NAKON OBJAVE
In other words, if the evidence submitted by the exporting producer clearly shows that MET/IT is not warranted, the additional and optional step of on-site inspections would typically not be organised.
Nakon objave Komisija je primila primjedbe od FESI-ja i Koalicije proizvođača obuće, koja je predstavnik uvoznika obuće u Uniju.
It is for the Commission to assess whether a verification visit is appropriate.
Postupovni uvjeti pri ocjeni obrazaca zahtjeva za MET/IT
The discretion to decide on the means of verifying the information in an MET/IT form lies with that institution.
FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće tvrdili su da teret dokazivanja pri ocjeni zahtjeva za MET/IT počiva na Komisiji jer su se kineski i vijetnamski proizvođači izvoznici oslobodili tereta podnošenjem zahtjeva za MET/IT u početnom ispitnom postupku.
So, where, as in the present case, the Commission decides, on the basis of a desk analysis, that it was in possession of sufficient evidence to rule on an MET/IT claim, a verification visit is not necessary and cannot be required.
FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće tvrdili su da su proizvođačima izvoznicima na koje se odnosi trenutačna provedba trebala biti dana ista postupovna prava koja su dana proizvođačima izvoznicima u uzorku tijekom početnog ispitnog postupka.
Concerning the claim that the rights of defence were not appropriately respected through the Commission's decision not to send deficiency letters, it is, first of all, recalled that rights of defence are individual rights, and that FESI and the Footwear Coalition cannot rely on a violation of an individual right of other companies.
FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće posebno su tvrdili da kineskim i vijetnamskim proizvođačima izvoznicima nije pružena mogućnost da nadopune svoje obrasce zahtjeva za MET/IT putem obavijesti o manjkavosti te da je provedena samo analiza dokumentacije, ali ne i provjere na licu mjesta.
Second, the Commission contests the assertion that there is a practice by the Commission that significant exchange of information and a detailed deficiency completion process is carried out when use is made of desk analysis alone as opposed to desk analysis plus on-site verification.
FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće nadalje su tvrdili da predmetnim proizvođačima izvoznicima na koje se odnosi ova provedba nisu omogućena ista postupovna jamstva koja se primjenjuju u standardnim antidampinškim ispitnim postupcima, već su primijenjeni stroži standardi.
Indeed, FESI and the Footwear Coalition have not been able to provide evidence to the contrary.
FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće tvrdili su da Komisija nije uzela u obzir vremensku razliku između podnošenja zahtjeva za MET/IT u početnom ispitnom postupku i ocjene tih zahtjeva.
FESI and the Footwear Coalition's comments on discrimination must equally be rejected as unfounded.
Nadalje, proizvođačima izvoznicima tijekom početnog ispitnog postupka omogućeno je samo 15 dana za ispunjavanje zahtjeva za MET/IT umjesto uobičajenog roka od 21 dana.
It is recalled that the principle of equal treatment is violated where the Union institutions treat like cases differently, thereby placing some traders at a disadvantage by comparison to others, without such differentiation being justified by the existence of substantial objective differences.
Na temelju toga su FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće tvrdili da nije poštovano osnovno pravno načelo omogućavanja zainteresiranim stranama da u potpunosti ostvare svoja prava na obranu iz članka 41.
Yet, that is precisely not what the Commission is doing: by requiring the non-sampled Chinese and Vietnamese exporting producers to file MET/IT claims for re-assessment, it intends to bring these formerly non-sampled exporting producers on the same footing as those who were sampled in the initial investigation.
Povelje o temeljnim pravima Europske unije i članka 6.
In addition, as the basic Regulation does not set out a minimumtimeframe in this regard, so long as the timeframe for this purpose is reasonable and provides the parties with sufficient opportunity to assemble (or re-assemble) the information needed while at the same time safeguarding their rights of defence, no discrimination occurs.
Ugovora o Europskoj uniji.
Regarding Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, in the current case, the Commission accepted the information provided by the exporting producers concerned, it did not reject this information and based its assessment on it.
Na temelju toga tvrdili su da je time što proizvođači izvoznici nisu dobili priliku dopuniti nepotpune podatke Komisija zloupotrijebila svoje ovlasti i učinkovito prebacila teret dokazivanja u fazi provedbe.
Therefore, the Commission did not apply Article 18.
Naposljetku, FESI i Koalicija proizvođača obuće tvrdili su i da bi se tim pristupom diskriminirala kineski i vijetnamski proizvođači izvoznici koji su bili uključeni u uzorak tijekom početnog ispitnog postupka, ali i drugi proizvođači izvoznici u državama bez tržišnoga gospodarstva nad kojima je proveden antidampinški ispitni postupak, a koji su u tom ispitnom postupku podnijeli zahtjeve za MET/IT.