natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Potpora koja predstavlja sastavni dio izuzeća od poreza predviđenog člankom 24.c Kodificiranog zakona br. 935 od 24. rujna 2009. za dozvole za crpljenje vode koje ne premašuju 6000 m ne sadržava element državne potpore u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 4 shall be immediate and effective.
Danska je nezakonito provela potporu koja predstavlja sastavni dio gornje granice poreza utvrđene na 25000 m3 u skladu s člankom 24.b Kodificiranog zakona br. 935 od 24. rujna 2009., čime je prekršila članak 108. stavak 3.
Denmark shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of its notification.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a potpora predstavlja državnu potporu nespojivu s unutarnjim tržištem.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Denmark shall submit the following information:
Potpora koja predstavlja sastavni dio gornje granice poreza utvrđene na 25000 m3 u skladu s člankom 24.b Kodificiranog zakona br. 935 od 24. rujna 2009. ne predstavlja državnu potporu ako je u trenutku dodjeljivanja ispunjavala sve uvjete utvrđene jednom od uredaba donesenih u skladu s člankom 2.
the list of beneficiaries that have received the aid referred to in Article 4 and the total amount of aid received by each of them;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 994/98, koja je bila primjenjiva u trenutku dodjele potpore.
the total amount (capital and interest) to be recovered from each beneficiary that received aid which cannot be covered by the de minimis rule;
Članak 6.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Danska je dužna povratiti potporu iz članka 4. od korisnikâ.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
Na iznose koje valja naplatiti obračunavaju se kamate od datuma na koji su stavljeni na raspolaganje korisnicima do njihova stvarnog povrata.
Denmark shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 4 has been completed.
Kamate se računaju na osnovi sastavljenoj u skladu s poglavljem V. Uredbe (EZ) br. 794/2004.
At the Commission's request, it shall immediately submit information on the measures already adopted and planned for the purpose of complying with this Decision.
Članak 7.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Povrat potpore iz članka 4. mora biti trenutačan i učinkovit.
Article 9
Danska je dužna zajamčiti da se ova odluka provede u roku od četiri mjeseca od datuma njezine objave.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.
Članak 8.
Done at Brussels, 16 October 2017.
U roku od dva mjeseca od objave ove odluke Danska mora dostaviti sljedeće podatke:
For the Commission
popis korisnika koji su primili potporu iz članka 4. i ukupan iznos koji je primio svaki korisnik;
Member of the Commission
ukupan iznos (glavnica i kamate) koji valja povratiti od svakog korisnika koji je primio potporu koja nije obuhvaćena pravilom o de minimis potporama;
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).
podroban opis već poduzetih mjera i mjera predviđenih u svrhu postizanja sukladnosti s ovom odlukom;
The two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical.
dokumente iz kojih je vidljivo da je korisnicima naložen povrat potpore.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
Danska mora obavješćivati Komisiju o napretku nacionalnih mjera poduzetih radi provedbe ove odluke do potpunog povrata potpore iz članka 4.
The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’, ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’ and ‘Court of First Instance’ by ‘General Court’.
Na zahtjev Komisije bez odgađanja mora dostaviti sve podatke o već poduzetim mjerama i mjerama predviđenima u svrhu postizanja sukladnosti s ovom odlukom.
The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this Decision.
Jednako tako, mora dostavljati podrobne informacije o iznosima potpore i kamata koji su već povraćeni od korisnika.
The Commission's conclusion in this case was that the tax scheme did not constitute State aid.
Članak 9.
Letter SG-Greffe (2012) D/5011.
Ova je Odluka upućena Kraljevini Danskoj.
OJ C 114, 19.4.2012, p. 4.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 16. listopada 2017.
‘Public water utilities’ refers to public or private systems that supply drinking water to at least ten properties.
Za Komisiju
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1535/2007 of 20 December 2007 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid in the sector of agricultural production (OJ L 337, 21.12.2007, p. 35).
Član Komisije
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de minimis aid (OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 5).
Počevši od 1. prosinca 2009. članci 87. i 88.
OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p. 1.
Ugovora o EZ-u postali su članci 107. i 108.
OJ C 319, 27.12.2006, p. 1.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (u daljnjem tekstu: UFEU).
OJ C 16, 22.1.2009, p. 1.
U obama su slučajevima odredbe u biti istovjetne.
In 2009 this framework was extended to apply to primary agricultural production as well (OJ C 261, 31.10.2009, p. 2) and then extended until the end of 2011 for all the sectors where it is applicable (OJ C 6, 11.1.2011, p. 5).
Ako je to potrebno, za potrebe ove odluke upućivanja na članke 107. i 108.
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2008, British Aggregates v Commission, C-487/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757, paragraph 82.
UFEU-a znače upućivanja na članke 87. i 88.
The largest permit in terms of irrigation was for 270000 m3 per year in the period 2009-2011 and the largest in terms of livestock farming was for 511000 m2 per year.
U ovoj se odluci upotrebljava nazivlje iz UFEU-a.
Decision C(2003) 777 final COM amended (see Decision C(2003) 1224 final).
Komisija je u okviru predmetnog spisa zaključila da mehanizam oporezivanja ne sadržava element državne potpore.
OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3.
Dopis SG-Greffe(2012) D/5011.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 1996, Federal Republic of Germany, Hanseatische Industrie-Beteiligungen GmbH and Bremer Vulkan Verbund AG v Commission of the European Communities, joined cases C-329/93, C-62/95 and C-63/95, ECLI:EU:C:1996:394.
SL C 114, 19.4.2012., str. 4.
Judgment of the Court of 4 April 1995, Commission v Italian Republic, C-348/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:95, paragraph 27.
Ta je Uredba stavljena izvan snage Uredbom Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 od 13. srpnja 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2016, Ireland and Aughinish Alumina Ltd v Commission, Joined Cases T-50/06 RENV II and T-69/06 RENV II, ECLI:EU:T:2016:227, paragraph 230 [sic].
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 248, 24.9.2015., str. 9.).
Regarding the criterion in point 158(b) of the Environmental Guidelines (which provides that the environmental tax without reduction must lead to a substantial increase in production costs for each sector or category of individual beneficiaries), the Danish authorities quote tax administration figures showing that enterprises in the primary sector paid a total of DKK 26 million in tax per year under Section 24b in the period 2009-2010; they argue that these enterprises would have paid approximately DKK 138 million per year if they had been subject to the same tax as owners of public water utilities, i.e. 430 % more for the sector as a whole.
40.; i presudu Suda Europske unije od 6. rujna 2006. u predmetu C-88/03, Portugal/Komisija, ECLI:EU:C:2006:511, t.
Moreover, the Danish authorities argue that the various rates and the tax base (tax on the volume actually consumed which is collected indirectly from the economic operators as regards Section 24a and collected as direct tax on the volume for which a permit was issued, regardless of actual consumption, as regards Section 24b and adjusted by Section 24c), mean that the economic operators that are indirectly taxed under Section 24a are not in a comparable factual and legal situation to those that are directly taxable under Section 24b.
Vidjeti točku 733.
This would imply that there are two distinct tax schemes (one under Section 24a and another under Sections 24b and 24c), and that the relevant reference system for determining whether they entail State aid should be the tax scheme under Section 24b.
Smjernica Europske unije o državnim potporama u sektoru poljoprivrede i šumarstva te u ruralnim područjima za razdoblje 2014. – 2020.
According to data from the Jupiter database, which is administered by GEUS (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland), in the period 2009-2011 agricultural holdings used only 34 % of the volume for which extraction permits had been granted, while food processing enterprises used 48 % (however, this number is subject to a certain degree of uncertainty, given that primary producers are not required to measure the precise volume of water they extract),
Presuda od 4. travnja 1995. u predmetu C-348/93, Komisija/Italija, t.
agricultural holdings that extract their own water do not directly compete with the enterprises that are connected to a public water utility.
27., ECLI:EU:C:1995:95.
Their location means that nearly all of them own their own water extraction system, and even if some of them may be connected to a public water utility, those enterprises that use large volumes of water have a supplementary private extraction permit, ensuring that drinking water from the public water supply is used only for the household,
Presuda od 22. travnja 2016. u spojenim predmetima T-50/06 RENV II i T-69/06 RENV II, t.
many holdings and enterprises hold a permit for extracting surface water and as such are not subject to the tax on extracting groundwater.
230., ECLI:EU:T:2016:227,
Introducing a lower tax for agricultural holdings that extract groundwater evens out the differences between enterprises that extract groundwater and those that extract surface water and are therefore not subject to the tax,
SL C 272, 15.11.2007., str. 4.
the water quality also varies depending on whether an enterprise is connected to a public water utility or has a permit for private extraction.
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 794/2004 od 21. travnja 2004. o provedbi Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za primjenu članka 108.
The public system is required to supply clean drinking water, whereas the amounts of pesticides, nitrates and bacteria in the water from private systems often exceeds the maximum limits, and holders of private permits therefore often have to invest DKK 10000-50000 to meet the legal requirements for drinking water.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 140, 30.4.2004., str. 1.).
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 83(1), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 83. stavak 1. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 6. točkom (a),
In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2015/1913, the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (‘the Convention’) was signed on 22 October 2015, subject to its conclusion.
U skladu s Odlukom Vijeća (EU) 2015/1913 Konvencija Vijeća Europe o sprječavanju terorizma („Konvencija”) potpisana je 22. listopada 2015., podložno njezinu sklapanju.
Article 23 of the Convention provides that the Convention is open for approval by the Union.
Člankom 23.
Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council established common Union rules on combatting terrorism.
Konvencije predviđeno je da je Konvencija otvorena za odobrenje od strane Unije.
Consequently, the Union has already adopted measures in different areas covered by the Convention.
Direktivom (EU) 2017/541 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća utvrđena su zajednička pravila Unije o suzbijanju terorizma.
The Convention should therefore be approved on behalf of the Union as regards matters falling within the competence of the Union in so far as the Convention may affect those common rules or alter their scope.
Slijedom toga Unija je već donijela mjere u različitim područjima obuhvaćenima Konvencijom.
The Member States retain their competence in so far as the Convention does not affect common rules or alter the scope thereof.
Konvenciju bi stoga trebalo odobriti u ime Unije u vezi s pitanjima koja su u nadležnosti Unije u mjeri u kojoj se Konvencijom može utjecati na ta zajednička pravila ili izmijeniti njihovo područje primjene.
Ireland is bound by Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and is therefore taking part in the adoption of this Decision.
Države članice zadržavaju svoju nadležnost u mjeri u kojoj se Konvencijom ne utječe na zajednička pravila ili ne mijenja njihovo područje primjene.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, the United Kingdom is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Okvirna odluka Vijeća 2002/475/PUP obvezujuća je za Irsku te ona stoga sudjeluje u donošenju ove Odluke.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
U skladu s člancima 1. i 2.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Protokola br. 21 o stajalištu Ujedinjene Kraljevine i Irske s obzirom na područje slobode, sigurnosti i pravde, priloženog Ugovoru o Europskoj uniji i Ugovoru o funkcioniranju Europske unije, i ne dovodeći u pitanje članak 4. navedenog protokola, Ujedinjena Kraljevina ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Odluke te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje.
The Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, as regards matters falling within the competence of the Union, is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Protokola br. 22 o stajalištu Danske, priloženog Ugovoru o Europskoj uniji i Ugovoru o funkcioniranju Europske unije, Danska ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Odluke te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje,
The text of the Convention is attached to this Decision.
DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
The President of the Council shall designate the person(s) empowered to deposit, on behalf of the Union, the instrument of approval provided for in Article 23 of the Convention.
Konvencija Vijeća Europe o sprječavanju terorizma, u vezi s pitanjima koja su u nadležnosti Unije, odobrava se u ime Unije.
Article 3
Tekst Konvencije priložen je ovoj Odluci.
Done at Luxembourg, 4 June 2018.
Predsjednik Vijeća određuje jednu ili više osoba ovlaštenih za polaganje, u ime Unije, isprave o odobrenju predviđene u članku 23.
For the Council
Konvencije.
Consent of 18 April 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Sastavljeno u Luxembourgu 4. lipnja 2018.
Council Decision (EU) 2015/1913 of 18 September 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No 196) (OJ L 280, 24.10.2015, p. 22).
Za Vijeće
CETS No 196.
Predsjednica
Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 6).
Suglasnost od 18. travnja 2018. (još nije objavljena u Službenom listu).
Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3).
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2015/1913 od 18. rujna 2015. o potpisivanju, u ime Europske unije, Konvencije Vijeća Europe o sprječavanju terorizma (CETS br. 196) (SL L 280, 24.10.2015., str. 22.).
The date of entry into force of the Convention for the European Union will be published in the Official Journal by the General Secretariat of the Council.
CETS br. 196.
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 83(1), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 83. stavak 1. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 6. točkom (a),
In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2015/1914, the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (‘the Additional Protocol’) was signed on 22 October 2015, subject to its conclusion.
U skladu s Odlukom Vijeća (EU) 2015/1914, Dodatni protokol uz Konvenciju Vijeća Europe o sprječavanju terorizma („Dodatni protokol”) potpisan je 22. listopada 2015., podložno njegovu sklapanju.
Article 10 of the Additional Protocol provides that the Additional Protocol shall be open for approval by the Union.
Člankom 10.
Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council established common Union rules on combatting terrorism.
Dodatnog protokola predviđeno je da je Dodatni protokol otvoren za odobrenje od strane Unije.
Consequently, the Union has already adopted measures in different areas covered by the Additional Protocol.
Direktivom (EU) 2017/541 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća utvrđena su zajednička pravila Unije o suzbijanju terorizma.
The Additional Protocol should therefore be approved on behalf of the Union as regards matters falling within the competence of the Union in so far as the Additional Protocol may affect those common rules or alter their scope.
Slijedom toga Unija je već donijela mjere u različitim područjima obuhvaćenima Dodatnim protokolom.
The Member States retain their competence in so far as the Additional Protocol does not affect common rules or alter the scope thereof.
Dodatni protokol trebalo bi stoga bi odobriti u ime Unije u vezi s pitanjima koja su u nadležnosti Unije u mjeri u kojoj se Dodatnim protokolom može utjecati na ta zajednička pravila ili izmijeniti njihovo područje primjene.
The Additional Protocol requires each Party to designate a point of contact for the purpose of exchange of information on persons travelling abroad for the purpose of terrorism.
Države članice zadržavaju svoju nadležnost u mjeri u kojoj se Dodatnim protokolom ne utječe na zajednička pravila ili ne mijenja njihovo područje primjene.
Europol should be designated as the point of contact for the Union.
Dodatnim protokolom od svake stranke zahtijeva se da odredi kontaktnu točku za razmjenu informacija o osobama koje putuju u svrhu terorizma.
Points of contact for the Member States may also be designated.
Kao kontaktnu točku Unije trebalo bi odrediti Europol.
Ireland is bound by Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and is therefore taking part in the adoption of this Decision.
Mogu se odrediti i kontaktne točke država članica.
The Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, as regards matters falling within the competence of the Union, is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Protokola br. 22 o stajalištu Danske, priloženog Ugovoru o Europskoj uniji i Ugovoru o funkcioniranju Europske unije, Danska ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Odluke te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje,
The text of the Additional Protocol is attached to this Decision.
DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) is designated as the point of contact for the Union, as provided for in Article 7 of the Additional Protocol and in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Dodatni protokol uz Konvenciju Vijeća Europe o sprječavanju terorizma, u vezi s pitanjima koja su u nadležnosti Unije, odobrava se u ime Unije.
Article 3
Tekst Dodatnog protokola priložen je ovoj Odluci.
The President of the Council shall designate the person(s) empowered to deposit, on behalf of the Union, the instrument of approval provided for in Article 10 of the Additional Protocol.
Članak 2.
Article 4
Agencija Europske unije za suradnju tijela za izvršavanje zakonodavstva (Europol) određuje se kao kontaktna točka Unije, kako je predviđeno u članku 7.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Dodatnog protokola i u skladu s Uredbom (EU) 2016/794 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća.
Done at Luxembourg, 4 June 2018.
Članak 3.
For the Council
Predsjednik Vijeća određuje jednu ili više osoba ovlaštenih za polaganje, u ime Unije, isprave o odobrenju predviđene u članku 10.
The President
Dodatnog protokola.
Consent of 18 April 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan donošenja.
Council Decision (EU) 2015/1914 of 18 September 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No 196) (OJ L 280, 24.10.2015, p. 24).
Sastavljeno u Luxembourgu 4. lipnja 2018.
CETS No 217.
Za Vijeće
Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 6).
Predsjednica
Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3).
Suglasnost od 18. travnja 2018. (još nije objavljena u Službenom listu).
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA (OJ L 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53).
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2015/1914 od 18. rujna 2015. o potpisivanju, u ime Europske unije, Dodatnog protokola uz Konvenciju Vijeća Europe o sprječavanju terorizma (CETS br. 196) (SL L 280, 24.10.2015., str. 24.).
The date of entry into force of the Additional Protocol for the European Union will be published in the Official Journal by the General Secretariat of the Council.
CETS br. 217.
on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning the amendment of Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) and Protocol 37 containing the list provided for in Article 101 to the EEA Agreement (General Data Protection Regulation)
o stajalištu koje treba zauzeti u ime Europske unije u okviru Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a o izmjeni Priloga XI.
(Text with EEA relevance)
(Elektronička komunikacija, audiovizualne usluge i informacijsko društvo) Sporazumu o EGP-u i Protokola 37 koji sadržava popis predviđen člankom 101. uz Sporazum o EGP-u (Opća uredba o zaštiti podataka)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 16 in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 16. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 9.,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 2894/94 od 28. studenoga 1994. o rješenjima za provedbu Sporazuma o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, a posebno njezin članak 1. stavak 3.,