natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to article 76(9) of the law on the Supreme Court, the Minister of Justice can notify the President of the Republic about the need to appoint an extraordinary disciplinary officer if there is a case of disciplinary misconduct that satisfies the criteria of an intentional crime prosecuted by public indictment or intentional tax crime.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
It appears that whether a case satisfies these criteria will be determined autonomously by the Minister of Justice and the President of the Republic as their decisions on appointing the extraordinary disciplinary officer cannot be appealed from.
Članak 115.
OSCE-ODIHR opinion of 13 November 2017; para 119-121; Supreme Court opinion of 6 October, page 34.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
According to Article 108(17)-(19) of the law on the Supreme Court, the Minister of Justice is given the power to set the number of and appoint disciplinary judges for ordinary court judges without consulting the judiciary.
Nakon isteka razdoblja od tri godine, žalba bi se trebala podnijeti u roku od pet godina od trenutka kad je donesena odluka postala pravomoćna i zakonita, te u roku od jedne godine ako je podnesena kasacijska žalba, osim ako se izvanredna žalba podnese na štetu tuženika, u takvom se slučaju žalba može podnijeti najkasnije u roku od jedne godine od pravomoćnosti odluke (ili, ako je kasacija podnesena, najkasnije u roku od šest mjeseci nakon razmatranja kasacije; usporediti članak 89. stavak 4.
Additionally, the Minister of Justice would be able to personally control disciplinary cases conducted against ordinary court judges through disciplinary officers and an extraordinary disciplinary officer of the Minister of Justice appointed by himself (including under certain circumstances also from the prosecutors).
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu).
Disciplinary officers appointed by the Minister of Justice would be able to reopen closed investigations at request of the Minister of Justice.
Ako je proteklo pet godina nakon što je sporna odluka postala pravomoćna i ima nepovratne pravne učinke ili ako je opravdana prema načelima ili pravima i slobodama osoba i građana zajamčenih Ustavom, Vrhovni se sud može ograničiti samo na potvrđivanje da je sporna odluka u suprotnosti sa zakonom te na ukazivanje na okolnosti kojima se rukovodio pri donošenju takve odluke (usporediti članak 89. stavak 4. i članak 115. stavak 2.
According to the law, provisions enshrined in the Law on Ordinary Court Organisation including those concerning procedural aspects of disciplinary proceedings apply mutatis mutandis to Supreme Court judges; cf.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu).
Article 72(1) and Article 108 in conjunction with Article 10(1) of the law on the Supreme Court.
Članak 91. stavak 1.
The law on the Supreme Court amends in its Article 108 the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
Article 108(23) of the law on the Supreme Court in terms of Article 115c added to the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation.
Izvanredna žalba ne može se uputiti u kaznenim predmetima na štetu tuženika više od godinu dana nakon što je presuda postala pravomoćna (ili, ako je kasacija podnesena, najkasnije u roku od šest mjeseci nakon razmatranja kasacije); također ne postoji mogućnost žalbe protiv odluka kojima se utvrđuje ništavost braka, poništenje braka ili proglašenje razvoda (samo ako jedna ili obje strane ponovno stupe u brak nakon što je odluka postala pravomoćna) te odluke o usvajanju.
If the evidence was presented after time prescribed, cf.
Izvanredna žalba ne može se odnositi na blage prekršaje ili manje porezne prekršaje; usporediti članak 89. stavak 3. i članak 90. stavke 3. i 4.
Article 108(13) item b of the law on the Supreme Court.
Članak 89. stavak 2.
Article 108(23) of the law on the Supreme Court.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
ECtHR Case Vilho Eskelinen and others v Finland, 19 April 2007 para 62;Case Olujić v Croatia, 5 February 2009, para 34-43; Case Harabin v Slovakia, 20 November 2012 para 118-124; and Case Baka v Hungary, 23 June 2016, para 100-119.
Članak 89. stavci od 1. do 3.
Article 26 and Article 94 of the law on the Supreme Court.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
Article 134 of the law on the Supreme Court; the former chamber of labour, social security and public affairs is split into two chambers, the chamber of labour and social security and the new chamber of extraordinary control and public affairs; this new chamber will be composed by new judges as all current judges are transferred to the chamber of labour and social security; current Supreme Court judges can request a transfer to this new chamber.
Predmet Europskog suda za ljudska prava Brumărescu protiv Rumunjske, 28. listopada 1999., točka 61. predmet Ryabykh protiv Rusije, 3. ožujka 2003., točke 54. i 57.; predmet Miragall Escolano i ostali protiv Španjolske, 25. siječnja 2000., točka 33.; također Phinikaridou protiv Cipra, 20. prosinca 2007., točka 52.
A full list of tasks dealt with by this chamber is found in Article 26.
Presuda od 30. rujna 2003. u predmetu C-224/01, Köbler, ECLI:EU:C:2003:513, točka 38.
The president of the disciplinary chamber is autonomous vis-à-vis the First President of the Supreme Court and budget of that chamber can be substantially increased in comparison to the overall budget of the Supreme Court (cf.
Mišljenje CDL(2017)035, točke 58., 63. i 130.
According to Article 131 of the law on the Supreme Court, until all the judges of the Supreme Court in the Disciplinary Chamber have been appointed, other Supreme Court judges cannot be transferred to a post in that Chamber.
Odluka SK 19/05 od 28. studenoga 2006.; SK 16/05 od 14. studenoga 2007.
A full list of tasks dealt with by the disciplinary chamber is found in Article 27 of the law on the Supreme Court.
Posebno mišljenja Vrhovnog suda od 6. i 23. listopada i 30. studenoga 2017., mišljenje pravobranitelja od 11. studenoga 2017. te mišljenje OESS-ODIHR-a od 13. studenoga 2017.
Opinion CDL(2017)035 para 92.
Članak 74.
Opinion CDL(2017)035 para 43.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
Article 61(2) of the law on the Supreme Court.
Članak 76. stavak 8.
Opinion CDL(2017)035 para 67.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu; predsjednik Republike može imenovati izvanrednog dužnosnika zaduženog za stegovni postupak iz redova državnih odvjetnika koje predloži glavni državni odvjetnik ako se stegovni postupak odnosi na stegovni prekršaj koji ispunjava kriterije kaznenog djela počinjenog s namjerom za koje se pokreće javna optužnica ili namjernog poreznog kaznenog djela.
Article 186(1) of the Polish Constitution: ‘The National Council of the Judiciary shall safeguard the independence of the courts and judges’.
Članak 76. stavak 8.
For example, in the context of disciplinary proceedings against judges conducted by a Council, the European Court of Human Rights has questioned the level of influence of the legislative or executive authorities given that the Council was composed by a majority of members appointed directly by these authorities; ECtHR Case Ramos Nunes de Carvalho E Sá v Portugal, 55391/13, 57728/13 and 74041/13, 21 June 2016, para 77.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
Mandates of current judges-members would expire on the day preceding the beginning of a joint term of office of the new judges-members of the Council, but no later than 90 days from the entry into force of the law.
Prema članku 76. stavku 9.
The Constitution stipulates that the National Council for the Judiciary is composed of ex officio members (the First President of the Supreme Court, the Minister of Justice, the President of the Supreme Administrative Court and a presidential appointee) and elected members.
Dužnosnici zaduženi za stegovni postupak koje imenuje ministar pravosuđa mogli bi ponovno otvoriti zatvorene istrage na zahtjev ministra pravosuđa.
The elected members consist of four deputies ‘chosen by the Sejm’, two senators ‘chosen by the Senate’ and 15 judges ( ‘chosen from amongst’ the common, administrative and military courts and the Supreme Court).
Zakon o Vrhovnom sudu svojim člankom 108. mijenja Zakon o organizaciji redovnih sudova.
Article 1(3) of the law on the National Council for the Judiciary adding an Article 11a(2) and (3): it is noted that each group (of judges and of citizens) may lodge more than one nomination for a judge-member of the Council.
Članak 108. stavak 23.
If parliamentary clubs do not present, in total, 15 candidates, the Presidium of the Sejm will choose them in order to create a list of 15 candidates which is then transmitted to the Sejm committee (cf.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu u smislu članka 115.c koji se dodaje u Zakon o organizaciji redovnih sudova.
Judgement of 9 October 2014 in Case C-222/13 TDC, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2265, para 29-32; Judgement of 19 September 2006 in Case C-506/04 Wilson, ECLI:EU:C:2006:587, para 53; Judgement of 4 February 1999 in Case C-103/97 Köllensperger and Atzwanger, ECLI:EU:C:1999:52, para 20-23; Judgement of 17 September 1997 in Case C-54/96 Dorsch Consult, ECLI:EU:C:1997:413, para 36; Judgement of 29 November 2001 in Case C-17/00, De Coster, ECLI:EU:C:2001:651, para 18-21; Judgement of 13 December 2017 in Case C-403/16, Hassani, ECLI:EU:C:2017:960, para 40; ECtHR Case Baka v.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu.
Hungary, 20261/12, 23 June 2016, para 121.
Članak 134.
ECtHR Case Sõro v.
Zakona o Vrhovnom sudu; bivše vijeće za rad, socijalnu sigurnost i javne poslove podijeljeno je na dva vijeća, vijeće za rad i socijalnu sigurnost te novo vijeće za izvanrednu kontrolu i javne poslove; to će novo vijeće biti sastavljeno od novih sudaca jer se svi sadašnji suci premještaju u vijeće za rad i socijalnu sigurnost; sadašnji suci Vrhovnog suda mogu zatražiti premještaj u to novo vijeće.
Estonia, 3 September 2015, para 60-62.
Cjelokupni popis zadaća kojima se to vijeće bavi nalazi se u članku 26.
on the elements to be included in the technical, legal and financial arrangements between Member States for the application of the solidarity mechanism under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply
o elementima koje treba uključiti u tehničke, pravne i financijske aranžmane među državama članicama radi primjene mehanizma solidarnosti u skladu s člankom 13.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Uredbe (EU) 2017/1938 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o mjerama zaštite sigurnosti opskrbe plinom
Having regard to Article 13(12) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2017 concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir članak 13. stavak 12.
Article 194(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) states that EU energy policy should aim for security of energy supply in the Union, in a spirit of solidarity between Member States.
Uredbe (EU) 2017/1938 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 25. listopada 2017. o mjerama zaštite sigurnosti opskrbe plinom i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EU) br.
The Regulation on security of gas supply is intended to enhance solidarity and trust between the Member States and to allow the internal gas market to function for as long as possible, even when there is a shortage of supply.
994/2010,
The Regulation introduces, for the first time, a solidarity mechanism between Member States to mitigate the effects of a severe emergency within the Union and ensure that gas can flow to solidarity-protected customers.
budući da:
When adopting the measures needed to implement the solidarity mechanism, Member States have to agree on a number of technical, legal and financial issues in their bilateral arrangements and describe them in their emergency plans.
U članku 194. stavku 1.
To assist Member States with implementation, and having consulted the Gas Coordination Group, the Commission has prepared this non-binding guidance on the key elements that should be included in such arrangements,
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (UFEU) navedeno je da bi energetska politika EU-a trebala imati za cilj sigurnost opskrbe energijom u Uniji u duhu solidarnosti među državama članicama.
HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
Cilj je Uredbe o sigurnosti opskrbe plinom povećati solidarnost i povjerenje među državama članicama te omogućiti unutarnjem tržištu plina da funkcionira dokle god je moguće, čak i u slučaju nestašice u opskrbi.
Member States should follow the legally non-binding guidelines in the Annex to this Recommendation.
Uredbom se prvi put uvodi mehanizam solidarnosti među državama članicama kako bi se ublažili učinci ozbiljnoga izvanrednog stanja u Uniji i osigurao dotok plina do kupaca zaštićenih mehanizmom solidarnosti.
These guidelines should help Member States put in place technical, legal and financial arrangements to apply the solidarity obligations in Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 and describe them in the emergency plans they are required to draw up under the Regulation.
Pri donošenju mjera potrebnih za provedbu mehanizma solidarnosti države članice moraju se u okviru svojih bilateralnih aranžmana dogovoriti o nizu tehničkih, pravnih i financijskih pitanja te ih opisati u svojim interventnim planovima.
This Recommendation shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Kako bi pomogla državama članicama u provedbi, nakon savjetovanja s Koordinacijskom skupinom za plin, Komisija je pripremila ove neobvezujuće smjernice o ključnim elementima koje bi trebalo uključiti u takve aranžmane,
Done at Brussels, 2 February 2018.
DONIJELA JE OVU PREPORUKU:
For the Commission
Države članice trebale bi postupati u skladu s pravno neobvezujućim smjernicama sadržanima u Prilogu ovoj Preporuci.
Member of the Commission
Tim bi se smjernicama trebalo pomoći državama članicama da uspostave tehničke, pravne i financijske aranžmane za primjenu obveza solidarnosti iz članka 13.
OJ L 280, 28.10.2017, p.
Uredbe (EU) 2017/1938 i opišu ih u interventnim planovima koje moraju izraditi u skladu s Uredbom.
1.
Ova se Preporuka objavljuje u Službenom listu Europske unije.
ANNEX
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 2. veljače 2018.
INTRODUCTION
Za Komisiju
Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 (‘the Regulation’) translates the concept of solidarity into practice and establishes a solidarity mechanism between the Member States that comes into play when the conditions set out in the relevant provisions are fulfilled.
Član Komisije
Solidarity is a mechanism of last resort: it allows gas to flow uninterrupted, in a spirit of solidarity, to the most vulnerable.
SL L 280, 28.10.2017., str.
These are household customers and certain essential services defined as ‘solidarity-protected customers’ in Article 2(6) of the Regulation.
1.
The solidarity mechanism
PRILOG
If a Member State requests solidarity, the solidarity mechanism includes an obligation for the other directly connected Member States to prioritise supply to solidarity-protected customers in the requesting Member State over domestic customers with no solidarity protection.
UVOD
This is only necessary where the market fails to deliver the necessary gas volumes.
Uredbom (EU) 2017/1938 („Uredba”) koncept solidarnosti provodi se u praksi i uspostavlja se mehanizam solidarnosti među državama članicama koji se primjenjuje kad su ispunjeni uvjeti utvrđeni u relevantnim odredbama.
The limits on the help a Member State can provide are:
Solidarnost je mehanizam za krajnju nuždu: njime se, u duhu solidarnosti, omogućuje neprekinut dotok plina najugroženijima.
the available interconnection capacity,
To uključuje kupce iz kategorije kućanstvo i određene temeljne usluge definirane u članku 2. stavku 6.
the amount of gas necessary for it to supply its own solidarity-protected customers where the gas supply to them is threatened,
Uredbe kao „kupci zaštićeni mehanizmom solidarnosti”.
the safety of its own gas network, and
Mehanizam solidarnosti
for certain countries, the supply to critical gas-fired power plants to maintain the safety of the electricity supply.
Ako država članica zatraži solidarnost, druge države članice koje su izravno povezane s njome obvezne su u skladu s mehanizmom solidarnosti dati prednost opskrbi kupaca zaštićenih mehanizmom solidarnosti u državi članici koja je zatražila solidarnost pred domaćim kupcima koji nisu zaštićeni mehanizmom solidarnosti.
As a last-resort measure, solidarity can only be triggered by a requesting Member State where the market, both in the requesting Member State and in any of the potential provider Member States, fails to offer the necessary gas volumes, including those offered voluntarily by non-protected customers, to meet the demand from solidarity-protected customers.
To je nužno samo ako tržište ne može isporučiti potrebne količine plina.
Moreover, the measures in the requesting Member State's emergency plan, including forced curtailment down to the level of solidarity-protected customers, must have been exhausted.
Pritom je opseg pomoći koju može pružiti država članica ograničen:
Despite these strict conditions for triggering solidarity, the mechanism provides households and essential social services with the certainty and security of an uninterrupted gas supply.
raspoloživim kapacitetom spojnog plinovoda,
Under such circumstances, it is likely that non-market measures or curtailments have either already started or are imminent in the potential provider Member States as well.
količinom plina potrebnom da opskrbi vlastite kupce zaštićene mehanizmom solidarnosti kad je njihova opskrba plinom ugrožena,
Otherwise, offers of certain gas volumes would still exist and gas could still flow to where it is needed following price signals (assuming they exist), without the need to trigger solidarity.
sigurnošću njezine plinske mreže i
The solidarity mechanism is effectively a temporary reallocation of the remaining gas from customers that are not solidarity protected customers in one Member State to solidarity-protected customers in another, within the same integrated European gas market.
kod određenih zemalja, opskrbom kritičnih elektrana na plin radi održavanja sigurnosti opskrbe električnom energijom.
Solidarity can only be provided while the gas network is still able to safely reallocate and transport gas.
Država članica koja je zatražila solidarnost može je aktivirati kao mjeru u krajnjoj nuždi samo kad tržište u toj državi članici i svim državama članicama koje bi mogle pružiti solidarnost ne može ponuditi dostatne količine plina, uključujući one koje dobrovoljno ponude kupci koji nisu zaštićeni mehanizmom solidarnosti, kako bi se zadovoljila potražnja kupaca zaštićenih mehanizmom solidarnosti.
The different elements of a bilateral arrangement dealing with the legal, technical and financial aspects of solidarity are already partly covered by Article 13 of the Regulation.
Nadalje, moraju se iscrpiti mjere iz interventnog plana države članice koja je zatražila solidarnost, uključujući obvezno ograničavanje opskrbe do razine kupaca zaštićenih mehanizmom solidarnosti.
In addition, in their bilateral arrangements the Member States have to agree on all necessary elements and details so as to provide certainty and security to all involved in making the solidarity mechanism work.
Unatoč tim strogim uvjetima aktiviranja solidarnosti, tim se mehanizmom kućanstvima i temeljnim socijalnim uslugama osigurava pouzdanost i sigurnost neprekinute opskrbe plinom.
These arrangements have to be described in the respective emergency plans; in particular, the compensation mechanism, or at least a summary of it, must be included.
U takvim je okolnostima vjerojatno da se netržišne mjere ili ograničenja opskrbe već provode ili su neizbježni i u državama članicama koje bi mogle pružiti solidarnost.
Compensation as described in Article 13 of the Regulation is wide-ranging.
Inače bi ponude određenih količina plina još uvijek postojale te bi plin još uvijek mogao dotjecati tamo gdje je potreban prateći cjenovne signale (pod pretpostavkom da postoje) bez potrebe za aktiviranjem solidarnosti.
It encompasses payments for gas and additional costs (such as transport) for deliveries to solidarity-protected customers in the Member State requesting solidarity, along with payments to customers in the Member State providing solidarity for being curtailed.
Mehanizam solidarnosti u stvarnosti je privremena preraspodjela plina koji je preostao od kupaca koji nisu zaštićeni mehanizmom solidarnosti u jednoj državi članici kupcima zaštićenima mehanizmom solidarnosti u drugoj državi članici unutar istoga integriranog europskog tržišta plina.
For the purpose of these guidelines, compensation in this broader sense is referred to as ‘compensation for solidarity’.
Solidarnost se može pružiti samo ako plinska mreža još uvijek može sigurno preraspodijeliti i transportirati plin.
Compensation for damages incurred due to curtailment is referred to as ‘compensation for curtailment’.
Različiti elementi bilateralnog aranžmana kojima se uređuju pravni, tehnički i financijski aspekti solidarnosti već su djelomično obuhvaćeni člankom 13.
There are several conditions for solidarity to work properly.
Uredbe.
Firstly, market-based measures should be pursued for as long as possible.
Osim toga, države članice moraju se u bilateralnim aranžmanima dogovoriti o svim potrebnim elementima i pojedinostima kako bi se svim stranama koje osiguravaju funkcioniranje mehanizma solidarnosti osigurale pouzdanost i sigurnost.
Member States need to make every effort to set up a mechanism or platform that allows for voluntary demand-side response.
Ti aranžmani moraju se opisati u odgovarajućim interventnim planovima; pritom se osobito mora uključiti mehanizam naknade ili barem njegov sažetak.
This is in the interest of the potential provider and requesting Member States alike as, alternatively, non-market measures — such as forced fuel-switch or curtailment of customers — will need to start at an earlier stage.
Naknada opisana u članku 13.
It is also in line with the general principle in the Regulation that the market should be given maximum leeway to solve gas supply issues.
Uredbe širokog je raspona.
Secondly, wholesale prices need to be allowed to move freely, even during an emergency; freezing or capping prices will not allow price signals to reflect the need for additional gas, and so gas will not flow where it is needed.
Obuhvaća plaćanje plina i dodatnih troškova (poput transportnih troškova) za isporuku kupcima zaštićenima mehanizmom solidarnosti u državi članici koja je zatražila solidarnost te plaćanje kupcima u državi članici koja pruža solidarnost zbog ograničavanja njihove opskrbe.
Thirdly, cross-border access to infrastructure should be maintained technically and safely in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council at all times, even in an emergency.
Za potrebe ovih smjernica za naknadu se u tom širem smislu upotrebljava izraz „naknadna za solidarnost”.
Depending on the technical constraints in each Member State, arrangements should ensure that interconnectors, LNG terminals, underground gas storage facilities, hubs and demand-side offers, where appropriate, are fully accessible to market players across the border.
Za naknadu štete nastale zbog ograničavanja opskrbe upotrebljava se izraz „naknada za ograničavanje opskrbe”.
This will delay the need to trigger solidarity in the Member State facing supply difficulties.
Postoji više uvjeta za pravilno funkcioniranje solidarnosti.
Fourthly, Member States are encouraged to cooperate throughout the different stages of an emergency.
Prvo, tržišne mjere trebale bi se provoditi dokle god je to moguće.
Effective cooperation in the early stages could delay the need to trigger solidarity.
Države članice trebale bi poduzeti sve što je moguće da se uspostavi mehanizam ili platforma koja omogućuje dobrovoljno upravljanje potrošnjom.
It would also prevent the development of potentially different gas prices (e.g. following the value of lost load for curtailed customer groups) on connected markets and act as a disincentive for (providing) solidarity.
To je u interesu i mogućeg pružatelja solidarnosti i država članica koje su zatražile solidarnost jer će se inače netržišne mjere, kao što je obvezni prelazak na drugo gorivo ili ograničavanja opskrbe kupaca, morati početi primjenjivati u ranijoj fazi.