natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An EU trade mark court whose jurisdiction is based on Article 125(1) to (4) shall have jurisdiction in respect of:
Primjena pravila Unije o nadležnosti, priznavanju i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima
acts of infringement committed or threatened within the territory of any of the Member States;
Članak 122.
acts referred to in Article 11(2) committed within the territory of any of the Member States.
Ako ovom Uredbom nije drukčije određeno, pravila Unije o nadležnosti, priznavanju i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima, primjenjuje se na postupke koji se odnose na žigove EU-a i prijave žiga EU-a, kao i na postupke koji se odnose na istodobne i uzastopne tužbe na temelju žigova EU-a i nacionalnih žigova.
An EU trade mark court whose jurisdiction is based on Article 125(5) shall have jurisdiction only in respect of acts committed or threatened within the territory of the Member State in which that court is situated.
U slučaju postupaka koji se odnose na tužbe i tužbene zahtjeve iz članka 124.:
Article 127
članak 4. i članak 6., točke 1., 2., 3. i 5. članka 7. i članak 35.
Presumption of validity — Defence as to the merits
Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 ne primjenjuju se;
The EU trade mark courts shall treat the EU trade mark as valid unless its validity is put in issue by the defendant with a counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity.
članci 25. i 26.
The validity of an EU trade mark may not be put in issue in an action for a declaration of non-infringement.
Uredbe (EU) br.
In the actions referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 124, a plea relating to revocation of the EU trade mark submitted otherwise than by way of a counterclaim shall be admissible where the defendant claims that the EU trade mark could be revoked for lack of genuine use at the time the infringement action was brought.
1215/2012 primjenjuju se podložno ograničenjima iz članka 125. stavka 4. ove Uredbe;
Article 128
odredbe poglavlja II.
Counterclaims
Uredbe (EU) br.
A counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity may only be based on the grounds for revocation or invalidity mentioned in this Regulation.
1215/2012 koje se primjenjuju na osobe s domicilom u državi članici primjenjuju se i na osobe koje nemaju domicil ni u jednoj od država članica, ali u njima imaju poslovni nastan.
An EU trade mark court shall reject a counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity if a decision taken by the Office relating to the same subject matter and cause of action and involving the same parties has already become final.
Upućivanja u ovoj Uredbi na Uredbu (EZ) br.
If the counterclaim is brought in a legal action to which the proprietor of the trade mark is not already a party, he shall be informed thereof and may be joined as a party to the action in accordance with the conditions set out in national law.
1215/2012 po potrebi uključuju Sporazum Europske zajednice i Kraljevine Danske o nadležnosti i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima od 19. listopada 2005.
The EU trade mark court with which a counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity of the EU trade mark has been filed shall not proceed with the examination of the counterclaim, until either the interested party or the court has informed the Office of the date on which the counterclaim was filed.
Sporovi u vezi s povredom i valjanosti žigova EU-a
The Office shall record that information in the Register.
Članak 123.
If an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity of the EU trade mark had already been filed before the Office before the counterclaim was filed, the court shall be informed thereof by the Office and stay the proceedings in accordance with Article 132(1) until the decision on the application is final or the application is withdrawn.
Sudovi za žig EU-a
Article 64(2) to (5) shall apply.
Države članice na svojem državnom području određuju što je moguće manji broj nacionalnih sudova i sudišta prvog i drugog stupnja, koji obavljaju funkcije koje su im dodijeljene ovom Uredbom.
Where an EU trade mark court has given a judgment which has become final on a counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark, a copy of the judgment shall be sent to the Office without delay, either by the court or by any of the parties to the national proceedings.
O svakoj promjeni koja se odnosi na broj, ime ili mjesnu nadležnost sudova koji se nalaze na popisu sudova za žig EU-a koje je država članica dostavila Komisiji u skladu s člankom 95. stavkom 2.
The Office or any other interested party may request information about such transmission.
Uredbe (EZ) br.
The Office shall mention the judgment in the Register and shall take the necessary measures to comply with its operative part.
207/2009, dotična država članica bez odlaganja obavješćuje Komisiju.
The EU trade mark court hearing a counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity may stay the proceedings on application by the proprietor of the EU trade mark and after hearing the other parties and may request the defendant to submit an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity to the Office within a time limit which it shall determine.
Komisija obavješćuje države članice o podacima iz stavka 2. i objavljuje ih u Službenom listu Europske unije.
If the application is not made within the time limit, the proceedings shall continue; the counterclaim shall be deemed withdrawn.
Članak 124.
Article 132(3) shall apply.
Nadležnost za povrede i valjanost
Article 129
Sudovi za žig EU-a imaju isključivu nadležnost:
Applicable law
za postupke povodom tužbe zbog povrede i – ako su dopuštene nacionalnim zakonodavstvom – tužbe u odnosu na prijetnju povrede žigova EU-a;
The EU trade mark courts shall apply the provisions of this Regulation.
za postupke povodom tužbe za utvrđivanje nepostojanja povrede ako su one dopuštene nacionalnim zakonodavstvom;
On all trade mark matters not covered by this Regulation, the relevant EU trade mark court shall apply the applicable national law.
za postupke povodom tužbe podnesene zbog radnji iz članka 11. stavka 2.;
Unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation, an EU trade mark court shall apply the rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark in the Member State in which the court is located.
za postupke povodom protutužbe za opoziv ili za proglašavanje žiga EU-a ništavim sukladno s člankom 128.
Article 130
Članak 125.
Sanctions
Međunarodna nadležnost
Where an EU trade mark court finds that the defendant has infringed or threatened to infringe an EU trade mark, it shall, unless there are special reasons for not doing so, issue an order prohibiting the defendant from proceeding with the acts which infringed or would infringe the EU trade mark.
Podložno odredbama ove Uredbe kao i odredbama Uredbe (EU) br.
It shall also take such measures in accordance with its national law as are aimed at ensuring that this prohibition is complied with.
1215/2012 koje se primjenjuju na temelju članka 122., postupci koji se odnose na tužbe i tužbene zahtjeve iz članka 124. pokreću se pred sudovima države članice u kojoj tuženik ima domicil ili, ako nema domicil ni u jednoj državi članici, u državi članici u kojoj ima poslovni nastan.
The EU trade mark court may also apply measures or orders available under the applicable law which it deems appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
Ako tuženik nema domicil ni poslovni nastan ni u jednoj državi članici, takvi se postupci pokreću pred sudovima države članice u kojoj tužitelj ima domicil ili, ako on nema domicil ni u jednoj državi članici, u onoj državi u kojoj tužitelj ima poslovni nastan.
Article 131
Ako ni tuženik ni tužitelj nemaju takav domicil ni takav poslovni nastan, takvi se postupci pokreću pred sudovima države članice u kojoj Ured ima sjedište.
Provisional and protective measures
Neovisno o stavcima 1., 2. i 3.:
Application may be made to the courts of a Member State, including EU trade mark courts, for such provisional, including protective, measures in respect of an EU trade mark or EU trade mark application as may be available under the law of that State in respect of a national trade mark, even if, under this Regulation, an EU trade mark court of another Member State has jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter.
članak 25.
An EU trade mark court whose jurisdiction is based on Article 125(1), (2), (3) or (4) shall have jurisdiction to grant provisional and protective measures which, subject to any necessary procedure for recognition and enforcement pursuant to Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, are applicable in the territory of any Member State.
Uredbe (EU) br.
No other court shall have such jurisdiction.
1215/2012 primjenjuje se ako su stranke suglasne da nadležnost ima neki drugi sud za žig EU-a;
Article 132
članak 26.
Specific rules on related actions
Uredbe (EU) br.
An EU trade mark court hearing an action referred to in Article 124 other than an action for a declaration of non-infringement shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, stay the proceedings where the validity of the EU trade mark is already in issue before another EU trade mark court on account of a counterclaim or where an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity has already been filed at the Office.
1215/2012 primjenjuje se ako se tuženik upusti u postupak pred nekim drugim sudom za žig EU-a.
The Office, when hearing an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, stay the proceedings where the validity of the EU trade mark is already in issue on account of a counterclaim before an EU trade mark court.
Postupci povodom tužbi i tužbenih zahtjeva iz članka 124., uz iznimku tužbi za utvrđivanje nepostojanja povrede žiga EU-a, mogu se pokretati i pred sudovima države članice u kojoj je povreda počinjena ili u kojoj prijeti opasnost od povrede, ili u kojoj je poduzeta radnja iz članka 11. stavka 2.
However, if one of the parties to the proceedings before the EU trade mark court so requests, the court may, after hearing the other parties to these proceedings, stay the proceedings.
Članak 126.
The Office shall in this instance continue the proceedings pending before it.
Opseg nadležnosti
Where the EU trade mark court stays the proceedings it may order provisional and protective measures for the duration of the stay.
Sud za žig EU-a čija se nadležnost temelji na članku 125. stavcima od 1. do 4. nadležan je za:
Article 133
počinjene povrede ili prijetnje povrede na državnom području bilo koje države članice;
Jurisdiction of EU trade mark courts of second instance — Further appeal
povrede iz članka 11. stavka 2., počinjene na državnom području neke od država članica.
An appeal to the EU trade mark courts of second instance shall lie from judgments of the EU trade mark courts of first instance in respect of proceedings arising from the actions and claims referred to in Article 124.
Sud za žig EU-a čija nadležnost se temelji na članku 125. stavku 5. nadležan je samo u odnosu na počinjene povrede ili prijetnje povrede na državnom području države članice u kojoj se nalazi sjedište tog suda.
The conditions under which an appeal may be lodged with an EU trade mark court of second instance shall be determined by the national law of the Member State in which that court is located.
Članak 127.
The national rules concerning further appeal shall be applicable in respect of judgments of EU trade mark courts of second instance.
Pretpostavka valjanosti – obrana u odnosu na meritum
Other disputes concerning EU trade marks
Sudovi za žig EU-a smatraju žig EU-a valjanim, osim ako njegovu valjanost osporava tuženik protutužbom za opoziv žiga ili protutužbom za proglašavanje žiga ništavim.
Article 134
Valjanost žiga EU-a ne može se osporavati tužbom za utvrđivanje nepostojanja povrede.
Supplementary provisions on the jurisdiction of national courts other than EU trade mark courts
U postupcima povodom tužbe iz članka 124. točaka (a) i (c), prigovor u odnosu na opoziv žiga EU-a koji je podnesen drukčije nego protutužbom dopušten je ako se tuženik pozove na to da bi žig EU-a mogao opozvati zbog nedostatka stvarne uporabe u vrijeme pokretanja postupka povodom tužbe zbog povrede.
Within the Member State whose courts have jurisdiction under Article 122(1) those courts shall have jurisdiction for actions other than those referred to in Article 124, which would have jurisdiction ratione loci and ratione materiae in the case of actions relating to a national trade mark registered in that State.
Članak 128.
Actions relating to an EU trade mark, other than those referred to in Article 124, for which no court has jurisdiction under Article 122(1) and paragraph 1 of this Article may be heard before the courts of the Member State in which the Office has its seat.
Protutužbe
Article 135
Protutužba za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim može se temeljiti samo na razlozima za opoziv ili razlozima za ništavost iz ove Uredbe.
Obligation of the national court
Sud za žig EU-a odbacuje protutužbu za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti ako se odluka koju je donio Ured, a koja se odnosi na isti predmet, iste razloge za podnošenje tužbe i iste stranke već postala pravomoćna.
A national court which is dealing with an action relating to an EU trade mark, other than the action referred to in Article 124, shall treat the EU trade mark as valid.
Ako je protutužba podnesena u postupku u kojem nositelj žiga nije jedna od stranaka, on o tome mora biti obaviješten i može se uključiti u postupak kao stranka u postupku u skladu s uvjetima utvrđenim nacionalnim zakonodavstvom.
CHAPTER XI
Sud za žigove EU-a kojemu je podnesena protutužba za opoziv ili za proglašenje ništavosti žiga EU-a ne nastavlja s ispitivanjem protutužbe dok zainteresirana stranka ili sud ne obavijeste Ured o datumu podnošenja protutužbe.
EFFECTS ON THE LAWS OF THE MEMBER STATES
Ured tu informaciju upisuje u registar.
Civil actions on the basis of more than one trade mark
Ako je zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašenje žiga EU-a ništavim već bio podnesen Uredu prije nego što je podnesena protutužba, Ured o tome obavješćuje sud i zaustavlja postupak u skladu člankom 132. stavkom 1. dok odluka o zahtjevu nije konačna ili dok se zahtjev ne povuče.
Article 136
Primjenjuje se članak 64. stavci od 2. do 5.
Simultaneous and successive civil actions on the basis of EU trade marks and national trade marks
Kada je sud za žigove EU-a donio presudu na temelju protutužbe za opoziv ili za proglašenje ništavosti žiga EU-a koja je postala pravomoćna, sud ili bilo koja stranka u nacionalnom postupku odmah šalju jedan primjerak te presude Uredu.
Where actions for infringement involving the same cause of action and between the same parties are brought in the courts of different Member States, one seised on the basis of an EU trade mark and the other seised on the basis of a national trade mark:
Ured ili bilo koja zainteresirana stranka mogu zatražiti informacije o takvom prosljeđivanju.
the court other than the court first seised shall of its own motion decline jurisdiction in favour of that court where the trade marks concerned are identical and valid for identical goods or services.
Ured u registru navodi sudsku presudu i poduzima potrebne mjere radi usklađivanja s njezinim operativnim dijelom.
The court which would be required to decline jurisdiction may stay its proceedings if the jurisdiction of the other court is contested;
Sud za žig EU-a koji vodi postupak povodom protutužbe za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti može zastati s postupkom na zahtjev nositelja žiga EU-a i nakon saslušanja drugih stranaka i može zatražiti od tuženika da Uredu podnese zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti u roku koji taj sud odredi.
the court other than the court first seised may stay its proceedings where the trade marks concerned are identical and valid for similar goods or services and where the trade marks concerned are similar and valid for identical or similar goods or services.
Ako u tom roku takav zahtjev nije podnesen, postupak se nastavlja; protutužba se smatra povučenom.
The court hearing an action for infringement on the basis of an EU trade mark shall reject the action if a final judgment on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of an identical national trade mark valid for identical goods or services.
Primjenjuje se članak 132. stavak 3.
The court hearing an action for infringement on the basis of a national trade mark shall reject the action if a final judgment on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of an identical EU trade mark valid for identical goods or services.
Članak 129.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply in respect of provisional, including protective, measures.
Mjerodavno pravo
Application of national laws for the purpose of prohibiting the use of EU trade marks
Sudovi za žig EU-a primjenjuju odredbe ove Uredbe.
Article 137
U svim pitanjima žiga koja nisu obuhvaćena ovom Uredbom, mjerodavan sud za žigove EU-a primjenjuje primjenjivo nacionalno pravo.
Prohibition of use of EU trade marks
Ako nije drukčije određeno ovom Uredbom, sud za žig EU-a primjenjuje poslovnik kojim se uređuje isti tip parnice u odnosu na nacionalni žig u državi članici u kojoj se nalazi njegovo sjedište.
This Regulation shall, unless otherwise provided for, not affect the right existing under the laws of the Member States to invoke claims for infringement of earlier rights within the meaning of Article 8 or Article 60(2) in relation to the use of a later EU trade mark.
Članak 130.
Claims for infringement of earlier rights within the meaning of Article 8(2) and (4) may, however, no longer be invoked if the proprietor of the earlier right may no longer apply for a declaration that the EU trade mark is invalid in accordance with Article 61(2).
Sankcije
This Regulation shall, unless otherwise provided for, not affect the right to bring proceedings under the civil, administrative or criminal law of a Member State or under provisions of Union law for the purpose of prohibiting the use of an EU trade mark to the extent that the use of a national trade mark may be prohibited under the law of that Member State or under Union law.
Kada sud za žig EU-a utvrdi da je tuženik povrijedio ili namjeravao povrijediti žig EU-a, on, osim ako postoje posebni razlozi da to ne učini, izdaje nalog kojim se tuženiku zabranjuje daljnje vršenje radnji kojima se povređuje ili kojima bi se povrijedio žig EU-a.
Article 138
Sud također poduzima mjere u skladu sa svojim nacionalnim pravom čiji je cilj osigurati poštovanje takve zabrane.
Prior rights applicable to particular localities
Sud za žigove EU-a može osim toga primijeniti i mjere ili naloge dostupne u okviru primjenjivog zakona za koje smatra da su prikladni u okolnostima slučaja.
The proprietor of an earlier right which only applies to a particular locality may oppose the use of the EU trade mark in the territory where his right is protected in so far as the law of the Member State concerned so permits.
Članak 131.
Paragraph 1 shall cease to apply if the proprietor of the earlier right has acquiesced in the use of the EU trade mark in the territory where his right is protected for a period of five successive years, being aware of such use, unless the EU trade mark was applied for in bad faith.
Privremene i zaštitne mjere
The proprietor of the EU trade mark shall not be entitled to oppose use of the right referred to in paragraph 1 even though that right may no longer be invoked against the EU trade mark.
Sudovima države članice, uključujući sudovima za žig EU-a, može se podnijeti zahtjev za izricanje privremenih, uključujući zaštitnih, mjera u odnosu na žig EU-a ili na prijavu žig EU-a, koje postoje prema pravu te države u odnosu na nacionalni žig, čak i ako je, prema ovoj Uredbi, stvarno nadležan sud za žig EU-a druge države članice.
Conversion into a national trade mark application
Sud za žig EU-a čija se nadležnost temelji na članku 125. stavcima 1., 2., 3. ili 4., nadležan je za izricanje privremenih i zaštitnih mjera koje se, podložno bilo kojem postupku potrebnom za priznavanje i izvršenje sukladno s poglavljem III.
Article 139
Uredbe (EU) br.
Request for the application of national procedure
1215/2012, primjenjuju na državnom području bilo koje države članice.
The applicant for or proprietor of an EU trade mark may request the conversion of his EU trade mark application or EU trade mark into a national trade mark application:
Takvu nadležnost nema ni jedan drugi sud.
to the extent that the EU trade mark application is refused, withdrawn, or deemed to be withdrawn;
Članak 132.
to the extent that the EU trade mark ceases to have effect.
Posebna pravila o povezanim postupcima
Conversion shall not take place:
Sud za žig EU-a koji vodi postupak iz članka 124., osim postupka za utvrđivanje nepostojanja povrede, osim ako postoje posebni razlozi za nastavak postupka, po službenoj dužnosti, nakon saslušanja stranaka, ili, na zahtjev jedne od stranaka i nakon saslušanja drugih stranaka, zastaje s postupkom kad se valjanost žiga EU-a već osporava protutužbom pred drugim sudom za žig EU-a ili kad je Uredu već podnesen zahtjev za opoziv ili zahtjev za proglašavanje tog žiga ništavim.
where the rights of the proprietor of the EU trade mark have been revoked on the grounds of non-use, unless in the Member State for which conversion is requested the EU trade mark has been put to use which would be considered to be genuine use under the laws of that Member State;
Ured, kad vodi postupak povodom zahtjeva za opoziv ili zahtjeva za proglašavanje ništavim, osim ako postoje posebni razlozi za nastavak postupka, po službenoj dužnosti, nakon saslušanja stranaka ili, na zahtjev jedne od stranaka i nakon saslušanja drugih stranaka, zastaje s postupkom kad se valjanost žiga EU-a već osporava protutužbom pred sudom za žig EU-a.
for the purpose of protection in a Member State in which, in accordance with the decision of the Office or of the national court, grounds for refusal of registration or grounds for revocation or invalidity apply to the EU trade mark application or EU trade mark.
Međutim, ako jedna od stranaka u postupku pred sudom za žig EU-a to zatraži, sud može zastati s postupkom nakon saslušanja drugih stranaka u tom postupku.
The national trade mark application resulting from the conversion of an EU trade mark application or an EU trade mark shall enjoy in respect of the Member State concerned the date of filing or the date of priority of that application or trade mark and, where appropriate, the seniority of a trade mark of that State claimed under Articles 39 or 40.
U tom slučaju, Ured nastavlja postupak koji se pred njim vodi.
In cases where an EU trade mark application is deemed to be withdrawn, the Office shall send to the applicant a communication fixing a period of three months from the date of that communication in which a request for conversion may be filed.
Kad sud za žig EU-a zastane s postupkom, on može tijekom trajanja zastoja odrediti privremene mjere, uključujući zaštitne mjere.
Where the EU trade mark application is withdrawn or the EU trade mark ceases to have effect as a result of a surrender being recorded or of failure to renew the registration, the request for conversion shall be filed within three months of the date on which the EU trade mark application has been withdrawn or on which the EU trade mark ceases to have effect.
Članak 133.
Where the EU trade mark application is refused by decision of the Office or where the EU trade mark ceases to have effect as a result of a decision of the Office or of an EU trade mark court, the request for conversion shall be filed within three months of the date on which that decision acquired the authority of a final decision.
Nadležnost sudova za žig EU-a drugog stupnja – daljnji pravni lijekovi