natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following an anti-dumping investigation, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 [3], the Council also imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the PRC.
Vijeće je nakon antisubvencijskog ispitnog postupka („početni ispitni postupak”) Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 452/2011 [2] uvelo konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na uvoz određenog premazanog finog papira podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK” ili „predmetna zemlja”).
The countervailing measures took the form of an ad valorem duty rate ranging from 4 % to 12 % for imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 12 %.
Nakon antidampinškog ispitnog postupka Vijeće je Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 451/2011 [3] uvelo i konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz određenog premazanog finog papira podrijetlom iz NRK-a.
On 8 August 2011, the Chinese producers Gold East Paper Co.
Kompenzacijske mjere bile su u obliku stope pristojbe ad valorem u rasponu od 4 % do 12 % za uvoz od pojedinačno navedenih izvoznika uz stopu preostale pristojbe od 12 %.
Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper Co.
Kineski proizvođači Gold East Paper Co.
Ltd (‘the APP Group’), lodged applications for annulment of both Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2011 insofar as they concern the applicants [4].
Ltd. i Gold Huasheng Paper Co.
On 11 September 2014, the Third Chamber of the General Court dismissed both actions.
Ltd. („grupacija APP”) podnijeli su 8. kolovoza 2011. zahtjeve za poništenje Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 451/2011 i Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 452/2011 u mjeri u kojoj se odnose na podnositelje zahtjeva [4].
Request for an expiry review
Treće vijeće Općeg suda odbilo je obje tužbe 11. rujna 2014.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [5] of the countervailing measures in force on the imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the PRC, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zahtjev za reviziju zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera
The request was lodged by five Union producers (Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB, Burgo Group SpA, Fedrigoni SpA, Lecta Group and Sappi Europe SA), jointly referred to as the ‘applicant’, representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of coated fine paper.
Nakon objave obavijesti o predstojećem isteku [5] kompenzacijskih mjera koje su na snazi za uvoz određenog premazanog finog papira podrijetlom iz NRK-a Komisija je zaprimila zahtjev za pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 18.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in continuation of subsidisation and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Osnovne uredbe.
Initiation of an expiry review
Zahtjev je podnijelo pet proizvođača iz Unije (Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB, Burgo Group SpA, Fedrigoni SpA, Lecta Group i Sappi Europe SA), koji se zajednički nazivaju „podnositelj zahtjeva” i čine više od 25 % ukupne proizvodnje premazanog finog papira u Uniji.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 13 May 2016, by notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6] (‘the Notice of Initiation’) the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zahtjev se temeljio na činjenici da bi istekom mjera vjerojatno došlo do nastavka subvencioniranja i ponavljanja štete industriji Unije.
Parallel investigation
Pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera
Prior to the initiation of the expiry review, and in accordance with Articles 10(7) and 33(a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of China (‘GOC’) that it had received a properly documented review request and invited the GOC for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the content of the review request and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Osnovne uredbe.
The GOC accepted the offer for consultations and consultations were subsequently held on 11 May 2016.
Usporedni ispitni postupak
During the consultations, due note was taken of the comments submitted by the authorities of the PRC.
Objavljivanjem obavijesti u Službenom listu Europske unije 13. svibnja 2016.
However, no mutually agreed solution could be reached.
[7], Komisija je najavila i pokretanje revizije konačnih antidampinških mjera koje su na snazi za uvoz određenog premazanog finog papira podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine u Uniju zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
Investigation
Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1225/2009 [8].
Review investigation period and period considered
Komisija je prije početka revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera i u skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 7. i člankom 33. točkom (a) Osnovne uredbe obavijestila kinesku vladu da je primila primjereno dokumentirani zahtjev za reviziju i pozvala kinesku vladu na savjetovanja radi pojašnjavanja situacije u pogledu sadržaja zahtjeva za reviziju i postizanja zajedničkog rješenja.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidisation covered the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Međutim, nije bilo moguće postići zajedničko rješenje.
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Ispitni postupak
Parties concerned
Razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije i razmatrano razdoblje
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the investigation.
Ispitnim postupkom o vjerojatnosti nastavka ili ponavljanja subvencioniranja obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2015. do 31. prosinca 2015. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije” ili „RIPR”).
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the applicant, other known Union producers, exporting producers, importers and users in the Union known to be concerned as well as the Chinese authorities of the initiation of the expiry review, and invited them to participate.
Ispitivanjem kretanja važnih za procjenu vjerojatnosti nastavka ili ponavljanja štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2012. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije („razmatrano razdoblje”).
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and request a hearing within the time limits set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Strane na koje se odnosi postupak
All interested parties, who requested so, were granted a hearing with the Commission.
Komisija je u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka pozvala zainteresirane strane da joj se obrate radi sudjelovanja u ispitnom postupku.
Sampling
Osim toga, Komisija je posebno obavijestila podnositelja zahtjeva, ostale poznate proizvođače iz Unije, proizvođače izvoznike, uvoznike i korisnike iz Unije za koje se zna da se to na njih odnosi te kineska nadležna tijela o pokretanju revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera i pozvala ih da sudjeluju.
Sampling of exporting producers in the PRC
Zainteresiranim stranama pružena je prilika da iznesu svoje stavove u pisanom obliku i zatraže saslušanje u roku utvrđenom u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties, in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Svim zainteresiranim stranama koje su to zatražile odobreno je saslušanje pred Komisijom.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known 36 exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Odabir uzorka
In addition, the Commission requested the Mission of the People's Republic of China to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Odabir uzorka proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u
Only one group of exporting producers in the PRC provided the information requested in Annex I to the Notice of Initiation for the purpose of sampling [9].
U Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka Komisija je navela da bi mogla provesti odabir uzorka zainteresiranih strana u skladu s člankom 27.
At a hearing on 8 June 2016 the same group of exporting producers informed the Commission that it did not intend to provide a reply to the questionnaire.
Osnovne uredbe.
This was explained by no exports sales to the Union market during the review investigation period and the complex group structure.
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od svih 36 proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u koji su joj poznati zatražila da dostave podatke navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
All known exporting producers concerned, and the authorities of the PRC were informed about the consequences of non-cooperation and that in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation, the Commission may make its findings on the basis of the best facts available.
Uz to, Komisija je zatražila Misiju Narodne Republike Kine pri Europskoj uniji da utvrdi ostale proizvođače izvoznike, ako ih ima, koji bi mogli biti zainteresirani za sudjelovanje u ispitnom postupku i/ili da stupi u kontakt s njima.
Sampling of Union producers
Samo je jedna skupina proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u dostavila podatke zatražene u Prilogu I. Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka u svrhu uzorkovanja [9].
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Na saslušanju održanom 8. lipnja 2016. ta je skupina proizvođača izvoznika obavijestila Komisiju da ne namjerava odgovoriti na upitnik.
In accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales and production, taking also into account the geographical spread.
To je objasnila nepostojanjem izvozne prodaje na tržište Unije tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije i složenom strukturom grupacije.
The preliminary sample consisted of three groups of Union producers.
Sve poznate proizvođače izvoznike na koje se odnosi postupak i nadležna tijela NRK-a obavijestilo se o posljedicama nesuradnje i da Komisija u skladu s člankom 28.
The Commission invited interested parties to comment on the provisional sample.
Osnovne uredbe može donijeti nalaze na temelju raspoloživih podataka.
One of the provisionally sampled Union producers informed the Commission that it would not be in a position to reply to the questionnaire.
Odabir uzorka proizvođača iz Unije
The Commission also received a clarification that two other sampled parties were groups consisting of several producers.
Komisija je u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka navela da je odabrala privremeni uzorak proizvođača iz Unije.
Accordingly, the Commission revised the sample by replacing the non-cooperating producer with the next largest producer in terms of the volume of sales and production, as well as by selecting the largest producers within the other two groups of provisionally sampled producers.
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 1.
Having received no comments on the revised sample within the deadline, the Commission confirmed the sample as revised.
Osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala uzorak na temelju najvećeg reprezentativnog obujma prodaje i proizvodnje pri čemu je uzela u obzir i zemljopisnu rasprostranjenost.
The final sample accounted for over 30 % of the total Union production during the review investigation period and was therefore considered representative of the Union industry.
Početni se uzorak sastojao od tri skupine proizvođača iz Unije.
Sampling of unrelated importers
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strane da dostave primjedbe o privremenom uzorku.
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Jedan od proizvođača iz Unije iz privremenog uzorka obavijestio je Komisiju da neće moći odgovoriti na upitnik.
The Commission contacted five potential importers, but none replied to the sampling form.
Komisija je primila i pojašnjenje da su druge dvije stranke u uzorku skupine koje se sastoje od više proizvođača.
Questionnaires
U skladu s tim Komisija je preispitala uzorak i zamijenila proizvođača koji nije surađivao sljedećim najvećim proizvođačem s obzirom na obujam prodaje i proizvodnje te je odabrala najveće proizvođače iz ostalih dvaju skupina proizvođača iz privremenog uzorka.
Questionnaire — Government of China
Budući da u zadanom roku nije primila primjedbe na preispitani uzorak, Komisija je potvrdila uzorak kao preispitani uzorak.
On 13 May 2016 the Commission sent a questionnaire to the Government of China (‘the GOC’) including specific questionnaires for the China Development Bank, Export Import Bank of China (‘EXIM’), Agricultural Bank of China and China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (‘Sinosure’) based on the fact that they had provided loans and financial services to the coated fine paper industry according to the information in the request and/or in the original investigation.
Konačni uzorak činio je više od 30 % ukupne proizvodnje u Uniji tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije pa se smatrao reprezentativnim za industriju Unije.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward a questionnaire for banks to any other financial institutions known by the GOC to have provided loans to the industry concerned.
Odabir uzorka nepovezanih uvoznika
On 24 June 2016 the Commission received the reply to the questionnaire from the GOC.
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od svih poznatih nepovezanih uvoznika zatražila da dostave podatke navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
The Commission did not receive a reply from any of the listed above financial institutions.
Komisija je stupila u kontakt s pet potencijalnih uvoznika, ali nijedan nije odgovorio na obrazac za odabir uzorka.
On 2 September 2016 the Commission sent a deficiency letter to the GOC.
Upitnici
The GOC requested an extension of the deadline to reply to this deficiency letter.
Upitnik – kineska vlada
On 23 September 2016 the GOC informed the Commission that it decided not to submit its response to the deficiency letter and confirmed that it will no longer cooperate in the investigation.
Komisija je 13. svibnja 2016. poslala kineskoj vladi upitnik koji je uključivao posebne upitnike za Kinesku razvojnu banku, Kinesku izvozno-uvoznu banku („EXIM”), Poljoprivrednu banku Kine i Kinesko društvo za osiguranje izvoza i kredita („Sinosure”) na temelju činjenice da su, u skladu s informacijama u zahtjevu i/ili informacijama iz početnog ispitnog postupka, industriji premazanog finog papira pružili zajmove i financijske usluge.
By Note Verbale of 7 October 2016 the Commission informed the authorities of the PRC that following non-cooperation of the GOC, in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation, the Commission intended to make its findings on the basis of the best facts available.
Uz to, kinesku vladu tražilo se da proslijedi upitnik za banke svim ostalim financijskim institucijama za koje kineska vlada zna da su pružale zajmove predmetnoj industriji.
It also noted that a finding based on facts available may be less favourable than if the GOC had cooperated.
Komisija je 24. lipnja 2016. od kineske vlade primila odgovor na upitnik.
Questionnaire — Exporting producers
Komisija nije primila odgovor nijedne od prethodno navedenih financijskih institucija.
No questionnaire was sent to the exporting producers which have not replied to the Commission's request in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je 2. rujna 2016. kineskoj vladi poslala pismo za dopunu podataka.
The Commission did not send a questionnaire to the Chinese exporting producer referred to in recital (16) above either, as it had indicated that it would not reply.
Kineska vlada zatražila je produljenje roka za odgovor na to pismo za dopunu podataka.
Questionnaire — Union producers
Kineska vlada obavijestila je Komisiju 23. rujna 2016. kako je odlučila da neće dostaviti odgovor na pismo za dopunu podataka i potvrdila je da više neće sudjelovati u istrazi.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the three sampled Union producers and received questionnaire replies from all three of them.
Verbalnom notom od 7. listopada 2016.
Verification visits
Komisija je obavijestila nadležna tijela NRK-a da s je obzirom na nesuradnju kineske vlade Komisija namjeravala donijeti nalaze na temelju raspoloživih podataka u skladu s člankom 28.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary in the context of an expiry review for a determination of subsidisation, injury, and Union interest.
Osnovne uredbe.
Verification visits under Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following Union companies:
Napomenula je i da nalazi koji se temelje na raspoloživim podacima mogu biti manje povoljni nego što bi bili da je kineska vlada surađivala.
Burgo Group S.p.A., Altavilla Vicentina, Italy
Upitnik – proizvođači izvoznici
Condat (Lecta Group), Barcelona, Spain
Proizvođačima izvoznicima koji nisu odgovorili na zahtjev Komisije iz Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka nije poslan upitnik.
Sappi Europe SA, Brussels, Belgium for Sappi Austria Produktions GmbH&Co KG, Gratkorn, Austria
Komisija nije poslala upitnik ni kineskom proizvođaču izvozniku iz uvodne izjave 16. jer je on naveo da neće odgovoriti.
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Upitnik – proizvođači iz Unije
Product concerned
Komisija je poslala upitnike trima proizvođačima iz Unije u uzorku i primila je odgovore na upitnik od sva tri proizvođača.
The product concerned is certain coated fine paper (‘CFP’) which is paper or paperboard coated on one or both sides (excluding kraft paper or kraft paperboard), in either sheet or rolls, and with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 and brightness of more than 84 (measured according to ISO 2470-1), and originating in the PRC (‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex48101300, ex48101400, ex48101900, ex48102200, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910 and ex48109980 (TARIC codes 4810130020, 4810140020, 4810190020, 4810220020, 4810293020, 4810298020, 4810991020 and 4810998020).
Posjeti radi provjere
The product concerned does not include:
Komisija je zatražila i provjerila sve podatke koje je u kontekstu revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera smatrala potrebnima za utvrđivanje subvencioniranja, štete i interesa Unije.
Rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses.
Posjeti radi provjere u skladu s člankom 26.
Rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses are defined as those rolls which, if tested according to the ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 concerning the determination of resistance to picking — accelerated speed method using the IGT tester (electric model), give a result of less than 30 N/m when measuring in the cross-direction of the paper (CD) and a result of less than 50 N/m when measuring in the machine direction (MD).
Osnovne uredbe obavljeni su u prostorima sljedećih društava:
Multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard.
Burgo Group S.p.A., Altavilla Vicentina, Italija,
Like product
Condat (Lecta Group), Barcelona, Španjolska,
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical and technical characteristics, as well as the same basic uses:
Sappi Europe SA, Bruxelles, Belgija za Sappi Austria Produktions GmbH&Co KG, Gratkorn, Austrija.
the product concerned
PREDMETNI PROIZVOD I ISTOVJETNI PROIZVOD
the product produced and sold by the exporting producers on the domestic market of the PRC
Predmetni proizvod
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry
Predmetni je proizvod određeni premazani fini papir („PFP”), odnosno papir ili karton premazan s jedne ili obje strane (isključujući kraft papir ili kraft karton), bilo u listovima ili svitcima, težine 70 g/m2 ili više, a da ne prelazi 400 g/m2 i svjetline veće od 84 (izmjereno u skladu s normom ISO 2470-1), podrijetlom iz NRK-a („proizvod iz postupka revizije”), trenutačno obuhvaćen oznakama KN ex48101300, ex48101400, ex48101900, ex48102200, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910 i ex48109980 (oznake TARIC 4810130020, 4810140020, 4810190020, 4810220020, 4810293020, 4810298020, 4810991020 i 4810998020).
The Commission concluded that these products are like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Predmetni proizvod ne uključuje sljedeće:
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OF SUBSIDISATION
svitke pogodne za korištenje u strojevima za tisak iz role.
In accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, and as stated in the Notice of Initiation, the Commission examined whether the expiry of the existing duties would be likely to lead to a continuation of subsidisation.
Svitci pogodni za korištenje u strojevima za tisak iz role definiraju se kao oni svitci koji, kad se u skladu s normom testiranja ISO 3783:2006 utvrđuje njihova otpornost na čupanje – metoda povećanja brzine korištenjem uređaja IGT (električni model), daju rezultat manji od 30 N/m kad se ispituje u poprečnom smjeru toka vlakanaca i rezultat manji od 50 N/m kad se ispituje u smjeru proizvodnje papira.
Non-cooperation and the use of best facts available in accordance with Article 28(1) of the basic Regulation
višeslojni papir i višeslojni karton.
As explained above, the GOC initially cooperated with the Commission and replied to the questionnaire.
Istovjetni proizvod
However, since this reply was highly deficient, a deficiency letter was sent on 2 September 2016.
U ispitnom postupku pokazalo se da sljedeći proizvodi imaju ista osnovna fizička i tehnička svojstva te iste osnovne namjene:
After receiving the deficiency letter, the GOC on 23 September 2016 informed the Commission about its decision to discontinue cooperation.
predmetni proizvod,
The Commission therefore received only a limited amount of unverified information from the GOC.
proizvod koji proizvođači izvoznici proizvode i prodaju na domaćem tržištu NRK-a,
The Commission did not receive any replies to specific questionnaires intended for the China Development Bank, EXIM, Agricultural Bank of China, Sinosure or any other financial or insurance institution known by the GOC to have provided loans to the coated fine paper industry.
proizvod koji u Uniji proizvodi i prodaje industrija Unije.
The Commission made all interested parties aware of the consequences of non-cooperation and gave them the opportunity to comment.
Komisija je zaključila da su ti proizvodi istovjetni proizvodi u smislu članka 2. točke (c) Osnovne uredbe.
No comments in this regard were received.
VJEROJATNOST NASTAVKA SUBVENCIONIRANJA
The Commission, in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation, considered the use of best facts available necessary in order to examine the continuation of subsidy practices of the PRC in the paper industry.
U skladu s člankom 18.
On the use of facts available, the Appellate Body has recalled that Article 12.7 of the SCM Agreement permits the use of facts on record solely for the purpose of replacing information that may be missing, in order to arrive at an accurate subsidization or injury determination.
Osnovne uredbe i kako je navedeno u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka, Komisija je ispitala postoji li vjerojatnost da će zbog isteka postojećih pristojbi doći do nastavka subvencioniranja.
Accordingly, the Appellate Body has explained that ‘there has to be a connection between the ‘necessary information’ that is missing and the particular ‘facts available’ on which a determination under Article 12.7 is based.’
Nesuradnja i upotreba najboljih raspoloživih podataka u skladu s člankom 28. stavkom 1.
Therefore, ‘an investigating authority must use those ‘facts available’ that ‘reasonably replace the information that an interested party failed to provide’, with a view to arriving at an accurate determination.’
Osnovne uredbe