natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States must provide both legal assistance and legal representation free of charge if the conditions foreseen in the Directive and national implementing legislation are met.
Mora se poštovati pravo maloljetnika na saslušanje u postupcima vraćanja koji utječu na njih ili ih uključuju.
The request for free legal assistance and/or legal representation can be made by the returnee or his/her representative at any appropriate moment of the procedure.
U skladu s člankom 12.
Provision of legal advice by administrative authorities: legal advice may in principle be offered also by the administrative authorities responsible for issuing the return decisions, if the information provided for is objective and unbiased (effet utile).
Konvencije o pravima djeteta i uzimajući u obzir Opći komentar br. 12 Odbora UN-a o pravu djeteta na saslušanje [65], predmetne maloljetnike mora se saslušati ili izravno ili putem zastupnika ili odgovarajućeg tijela; mora se poštovati njihovo pravo na slobodno izražavanje i odgovarajuća težina mora se dati mišljenjima maloljetnika u skladu s njihovom dobi i zrelošću te uzimajući u obzir bilo kakve teškoće u komunikaciji koje možda imaju kako bi njihovo sudjelovanje bilo smisleno.Kako bi se osiguralo poštovanje prava maloljetnika na saslušanje u praksi, mjere koje države članice donose trebaju se voditi sljedećim ključnim načelima:
It is important that the information is provided by a person who acts impartially/independently so as to avoid possible conflicts of interests.
izražavanje mišljenja je izbor, a ne obveza,
This information cannot be provided therefore by the person deciding on or reviewing the case, for instance.
pravo na saslušanje ne bi trebalo podlijegati nikakvim dobnim granicama ili drugim proizvoljnim ograničenjima, ni u zakonu ni u praksi,
A good practice, already in use in some Member States, is to separate between the decision making authorities and those providing legal and procedural information.
maloljetnika bi trebalo saslušati u okruženju koje odgovara njegovim potrebama,
However, should a Member State decide to allocate the latter responsibility to the decision making authorities, a clear separation of tasks should be ensured for the personnel involved, for instance by creating a separate and independent section in charge only of providing legal and procedural information.
sredstva koja se upotrebljavaju za ostvarenje prava na saslušanje trebalo bi prilagoditi razini razumijevanja i komunikacijskim sposobnostima i trebalo bi uzeti u obzir okolnosti slučaja,
Conditions for free legal assistance/representation — reference to Article 15(3) to (6) of Directive 2005/85/EC: the reference to certain conditions/limitations which Member States may foresee in respect of free legal aid is a dynamic reference and must be read as reference to the current Articles 20 and 21 of the Asylum Procedures Directive currently in force and replacing Directive 2005/85/EC.
uzimajući u obzir potrebu zaštite maloljetnika od opasnosti, maloljetnika se ne bi smjelo intervjuirati dulje nego što je potrebno,
In accordance with the above-mentioned provisions, Member States may provide that the free legal assistance and representation is only granted:
za olakšavanje izražavanja mišljenja možda će biti potrebne posebne mjere za maloljetnike u posebno ranjivim situacijama, uključujući pružanje usluga tumačenja i prevođenja.
where the appeal is considered by a court or tribunal or other competent authority to have tangible prospect of success,
Prikupljanje informacija o krijumčarenju: u skladu s prioritetima utvrđenima u Akcijskom planu EU-a za borbu protiv krijumčarenja migranata za razdoblje 2015.
through the services provided by legal advisers or other counsellors specifically designated by national law to assist and represent applicants,
[66], a posebno u skladu s potrebom za poboljšanjem prikupljanja i razmjene informacija, Komisija preporučuje državama članicama da uspostave primjerene mehanizme za osiguranje sustavnog prikupljanja informacija od državljana trećih zemalja uhićenih u nezakonitoj situaciji potpuno poštujući temeljna prava i pravnu stečevinu EU-a o azilu.
in first instance appeal procedures and not for further appeals or reviews.
Potiče se države članice da prilikom odobravanja prava na saslušanje prije donošenja odluke o vraćanju pozovu povratnike da podijele informacije koje imaju u vezi s načinom rada i putovima krijumčarskih mreža te o vezama s trgovanjem ljudima i ostalim zločinima ili o prijenosu novca.
Member States may also:
Informacije dobivene u tom kontekstu trebale bi se prikupiti i razmijeniti između relevantnih nadležnih tijela i agencija (useljavanje, granica, policija) na nacionalnoj razini i razini EU-a u skladu s nacionalnim pravom i najboljom praksom razmijenjenom na relevantnim forumima EU-a.
impose monetary and/or time limits on the provision of free legal assistance and representation, provided that such limits do not arbitrarily restrict access to this right,
Direktivom o vraćanju izričito je uređen niz različitih odluka povezanih s vraćanjem, odnosno:
provide that, as regards fees and other costs, the treatment of applicants shall not be more favourable than the treatment generally accorded to their nationals in matters pertaining to legal assistance,
1. odluke o vraćanju (članak 3. stavak 4. i članak 6. stavak 1.);
demand to be reimbursed wholly or partially for any costs granted if and when the applicant's financial situation has improved considerably or if the decision to grant such costs was taken on the basis of false information supplied by the applicant.
2. odluke o vremenu za dobrovoljni odlazak te produljenje tog razdoblja (članak 7.);
Effective remedy against refusal to grant free legal aid: where a decision not to grant free legal assistance and representation is taken by an authority which is not a court or tribunal, Member States shall ensure that the applicant has the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal against that decision.
3. odluke o udaljavanju (članak 8. stavak 3.);
The right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial is among the fundamental rights forming an integral part of the European Union legal order and observance of those rights is required even where the applicable legislation does not expressly provide for such a procedural requirement.
4. odluke o odgodi udaljavanja (članak 9.);
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 14(1)
5. odluke o zabrani ulaska te o suspenziji ili ukidanju zabrane ulaska (članak 11.);
Member States shall, with the exception of the situation covered in Articles 16 and 17, ensure that the following principles are taken into account as far as possible in relation to third-country nationals during the period for voluntary departure granted in accordance with Article 7 and during periods for which removal has been postponed in accordance with Article 9:
6. odluke o zadržavanju te produljenju razdoblja zadržavanja (članak 15.).
family unity with family members present in their territory is maintained;
Većina navedenih odluka dodatne su odluke uz odluku o vraćanju i obično bi se trebale donositi zajedno s odlukom o vraćanju u jednom upravnom aktu: odluke o vraćanju mogu uključivati vrijeme za dobrovoljni odlazak (članak 7.), zabranu ulaska (članak 11.) i – po mogućnosti, ali ne nužno – odluku kojom se nalaže udaljavanje (u slučaju nepoštovanja vremena za dobrovoljni odlazak).
emergency healthcare and essential treatment of illness are provided;
Naknadne izmjene tih dodatnih odluka moguće su u sljedećim slučajevima:
minors are granted access to the basic education system subject to the length of their stay;
zabrana ulaska može se odrediti u kasnijoj fazi kao pomoćni i naknadni element već izdane odluke o vraćanju ako povratnik nije ispunio obvezu vraćanja u vremenu za dobrovoljni odlazak (članak 11. stavak 1. točka (b)),
special needs of vulnerable persons are taken into account.
već izvršiva odluka o vraćanju (ili nalog za udaljavanje) može se odgoditi (članak 9.).
Historic reminder/explanation: the Return Directive leaves to Member States the choice of either issuing return decisions to illegally staying third-country nationals or to grant a right to stay.
U članku 6. stavku 6.
This approach should help reduce grey areas.
Direktive o vraćanju potvrđeno je opće načelo kojim se državama članicama dopušta da kombiniraju nekoliko različitih odluka (uključujući odluke koje nisu izravno povezane s vraćanjem) u jednom upravnom ili sudskom aktu, pod uvjetom da su za svaku pojedinačnu odluku ispunjene odgovarajuće zaštitne mjere i odredbe.
It may, however, also increase in practice the absolute number of cases in which Member States issue return decisions which cannot be enforced due to practical or legal obstacles for removal (for example delays in obtaining the necessary papers from third countries and non-refoulement cases).
Odluke o prestanku zakonitog boravka (kao što je konačno odbijanje zahtjeva za azil, povlačenje vize ili neproduljivanje dozvole boravka) mogu se stoga donositi odvojeno ili zajedno s odlukom o vraćanju u jednom upravnom ili sudskom aktu.
In order to avoid a legal vacuum for these persons, the Commission had proposed to provide for a minimum level of conditions of stay for those illegally staying third-country nationals for whom the enforcement of the return decision has been postponed or who cannot be removed, by referring to the substance of a set of conditions already laid down in Articles 7 to 10, Article 15 and Articles 17 to 20 of Council Directive 2003/9/EC [71] (Reception Conditions Directive), covering — in essence — four basic rights: (1) family unity; (2) healthcare; (3) schooling and education for minors; and (4) respect for special needs of vulnerable persons.
Države članice u donošenju odluka o pravnom statusu državljana trećih zemalja trebale bi djelovati uz dužnu pozornost i bez odgode (vidjeti presudu Suda EU-a u predmetu C-329/11, Achughbabian (točka 31.): „[…] nadležna tijela moraju, kako bi se spriječilo ugrožavanje cilja Direktive 2008/115/EZ […] postupati uz dužnu pozornost i bez odgode zauzeti stajalište o zakonitosti boravka predmetne osobe”).
Other important rights under the Reception Conditions Directive, such as access to employment and material reception conditions, were not referred to.
Konkretni primjeri:
Following negotiations, in the course of which concerns were expressed that references to the Reception Conditions Directive might be perceived as an ‘upgrading’ of the situation of irregular migrants and thus send a wrong policy message, a ‘self-standing’ list of rights was established.
Ako država članica odluči ukinuti vizu i državljaninu treće zemlje odrediti rok od 7 dana za dobrovoljno napuštanje državnog područja države članice, je li ta odluka odluka o vraćanju u kontekstu Direktive o vraćanju?
The scope of situations covered by Article 14(1) is broad: it covers the period for voluntary departure as well as any period for which removal has been formally or de facto postponed in accordance with Article 9 of the Return Directive (for example appeal with suspensive effect, possible violation of non-refoulement principle, health reasons, technical reasons, failure of removal efforts due to lack of identification).
Ili je to obuhvaćeno drugim pravilima EU-a o vizama?
Periods spent in detention are expressly excluded, since the related safeguards are regulated elsewhere (see section 15).
Takva odluka može se sastojati od dvaju sastavnih dijelova: odluke o ukidanju vize i odluke o vraćanju u smislu Direktive o vraćanju.
The provision of emergency healthcare and necessary treatment of the illness is a basic minimum right and access to it must not be made dependent on the payment of fees.
Ako je viza ukinuta s trenutnim učinkom, državljanin treće zemlje „nezakonito će boraviti” u smislu članka 3. stavka 2.
Access to education: the limitation of ‘subject to the length of their stay’ should be interpreted restrictively.
Direktive o vraćanju i primjenjuje se članak 6.
In cases of doubt about the likely length of stay before return, access to education should be granted rather than not.
Direktive (obveza izdavanja odluke o vraćanju).
A national practice where access to the education system is normally only established if the length of the stay is more than fourteen days may be considered acceptable.
Protiv odluke o ukidanju vize moguće je, isto tako, podnijeti žalbu u skladu s pravilima o vizama iz Zakonika o vizama [67] (mogućnost donošenja nekoliko odluka istodobno s odlukom o vraćanju izričito je predviđena u članku 6. stavku 6.
As regards practical problems, such as cases in which the minor does not have a document proving the education already obtained in other countries or cases in which the minor does not speak any language in which education can be provided in the Member State, appropriate answers need to be found at national level, taking into account the spirit of the Directive and relevant international law instruments such as the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child and General Comment No 6 thereto [72].
Direktive o vraćanju).Ako se državljanin treće zemlje nalazi na državnom području s potrebnom vizom, ali (više) ne ispunjava uvjete za boravak (članak 6.
Inspiration may also be drawn from the asylum acquis (in particular Article 14 of the Reception Conditions Directive 2013/33/EU).
Zakonika o schengenskim granicama), čini se da država članica može izdati odluku o vraćanju.
Other basic needs: in its judgement in Case C-562/13, Abdida, the ECJ found that Member States are obliged to also cover other basic needs to ensure that emergency healthcare and essential treatment of illness are in fact made available during the period in which that Member State is required to postpone removal.
Hoće li ta odluka o vraćanju (kojoj je možda pridodana zabrana ulaska) automatski značiti da je viza prestala važiti?
It is for the Member States to determine the form in which such provision for the basic needs of the third-country national concerned is to be made.
U skladu s člankom 34. stavkom 2.
The logic upon which the ECJ relied to establish this obligation was that the requirement to provide emergency healthcare and essential treatment of illness under Article 14(1)(b) of the Return Directive may be rendered meaningless if there were not also a concomitant requirement to make provision for the basic needs of the third-country national concerned.
Zakonika o vizama „viza se ukida kada postane očigledno da više nisu ispunjeni uvjeti (tj. uvjeti za ulazak Zakonika o schengenskim granicama) za njezino izdavanje”.
Based on this logic developed by the ECJ, and in light of the indications provided for in relevant case-law of the ECtHR, it can be derived that enjoyment of the other rights enumerated in Article 14(1) of the Return Directive (such as in particular access to education and taking into account needs of vulnerable persons) also give rise to a concomitant requirement to make provision for the basic needs of the third-country national concerned.
Nadležna tijela koja izdaju odluku o vraćanju moraju također osigurati ukidanje vize.
Even though there is no general legal obligation under Union law to make provision for the basic needs of all third-country nationals pending return, the Commission encourages Member States to do so under national law, in order to assure humane and dignified conditions of life for returnees.
Međutim, obje se odluke mogu donijeti u okviru jednog upravnog akta.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 14(2)
Mora se izbjeći izdavanje odluke o vraćanju i dopuštanje osobi da ode s valjanom (jedinstvenom) vizom.
Member States shall provide the persons referred to in paragraph 1 with a written confirmation in accordance with national legislation that the period for voluntary departure has been extended in accordance with Article 7(2) or that the return decision will temporarily not be enforced.
Može li se odlukom o odbijanju zahtjeva za azil odrediti obveza vraćanja?
Recital 12 of the Return Directive specifies: ‘In order to be able to demonstrate their specific situation in the event of administrative controls or checks, such persons should be provided with written confirmation of their situation.
Konačno odbijanje zahtjeva za azil i izdavanje odluke o vraćanju mogu biti jedan akt u skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 6.
Member States should enjoy wide discretion concerning the form and format of the written confirmation and should also be able to include it in decisions related to return adopted under this Directive’.
Direktive o vraćanju.
Form of the written confirmation: Member States enjoy wide discretion.
Takav se kombinirani akt sastoji, u strogo logičnom smislu, od dvije odluke koje se donose jedna za drugom i međusobno su povezane, te su odvojene „logičkim momentom”.
The confirmation can either be a separate paper issued by the national authorities or part of a formal decision related to return.
Pravna osnova: Direktiva o vraćanju – članak 12. stavci od 1. do 3.
It is important that it allows the returnee to clearly demonstrate — in case of a police control — that he/she is already subject of a pending return decision and that he/she benefits from a period for voluntary departure, a formal postponement of removal or that he/she is subject of a return decision which can temporarily not be enforced.
Odluke o vraćanju te odluke o zabrani ulaska i odluke o udaljavanju, ako su izdane, izdaju se u pisanom obliku te sadrže stvarne i pravne razloge, kao i podatke o raspoloživim pravnim lijekovima.
The confirmation should specify, if possible, the length of the period for voluntary departure or the postponement.
Podaci o činjenicama mogu biti ograničeni ako nacionalno pravo omogućava ograničenje prava na informacije, posebno zbog očuvanja nacionalne sigurnosti, obrane, javne sigurnosti te zbog sprječavanja, istrage, otkrivanja i progona za kaznena djela.
In Member States in which data exchange systems allow for the quick verification of the status of irregular migrants in case of police controls on the basis of certain personal data or reference numbers, the written confirmation requirement can be considered as fulfilled if the person is provided with (or already owns) documents or papers containing these personal data or reference numbers.
Pisana odluka osnovni je temelj postupovnih sigurnosnih mjera predviđenih u Direktivi o vraćanju.
No obligation to grant a permit to non-removable returnees: Member States are not obliged to grant a permit to returnees once it becomes clear that there is no more reasonable prospect of removal, although they may decide to do so in application of Article 6(4) of the Return Directive (see section 5.6).
Taj se zahtjev mora ispuniti.
In this regard, the ECJ expressly clarified in the judgment of Case C-146/14, Mahdi [73] (paragraphs 87 and 88): ‘[…] the purpose of the directive is not to regulate the conditions of residence on the territory of a Member State of third-country nationals who are staying illegally and in respect of whom it is not, or has not been, possible to implement a return decision. […] However, Article 6(4) of Directive 2008/115/EC enables the Member States to grant an autonomous residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay for compassionate, humanitarian or other reasons to a third-country national staying illegally on their territory’.
Informacije koje se daju povratniku, međutim, ne bi trebale biti ograničene na upućivanja na dostupne pravne lijekove: Potiče se države članice da dostave i druge informacije o praktičnim načinima ispunjenja odluke.
Criteria to take into account for granting permits: as highlighted above, there is no legal obligation to issue permits to non-removable returnees and Member States enjoy broad discretion.
Preporučuje se da bi povratniku trebalo dati informacije o tome može li, primjerice, država članica pridonijeti troškovima prijevoza, hoće li povratnik moći iskoristiti program potpomognutog dobrovoljnog vraćanja ili može li se dobiti produljenje roka za ispunjenje odluke o vraćanju.
In this context, it is recommended that the assessment criteria that could be taken into account by Member States include both individual (case-related) as well as horizontal (policy-related) elements such as in particular:
Povratnika bi trebalo obavijestiti i o obvezi napuštanja područja država članica EU-a i zemalja pridruženih Schengenu, kao i o posljedicama neispunjenja obveze vraćanja kako bi se takvu osobu potaknulo na dobrovoljni odlazak.
the cooperative/non-cooperative attitude of the returnee,
U skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 2. podstavkom 2.
the length of factual stay of the returnee in the Member State,
Direktive o sankcijama za poslodavce, povratnike se obavješćuje o njihovom pravu u skladu s navedenom Direktivom da traže plaćanje nepodmirene naknade od poslodavca te o dostupnim mehanizmima za pritužbe.
integration efforts made by the returnee,
Te bi se informacije također mogle uključiti u odluku o vraćanju ili priložiti toj odluci.
personal conduct of the returnee,
Države članice na zahtjev osiguravaju pisani ili usmeni prijevod glavnih dijelova odluke o vraćanju iz stavka 1., uključujući podatke o raspoloživim pravnim lijekovima na jeziku koji državljanin treće zemlje razumije ili se opravdano može pretpostaviti da razumije.
family links,
Zahtjev za prijevod može sastaviti povratnik ili njegov pravni zastupnik.
humanitarian considerations,
Država članica može izabrati hoće li osigurati pisani ili usmeni prijevod istodobno osiguravajući da državljanin treće zemlje može razumjeti kontekst i sadržaj.
the likelihood of return in the foreseeable future,
Ne može se tražiti naknada za osiguranje prijevoda jer bi se time ugrozio duh odredbe, odnosno da se povratniku moraju osigurati sve potrebne informacije kako bi u potpunosti mogao razumjeti svoju pravnu situaciju i ispuniti odluku o vraćanju.
need to avoid rewarding irregularity,
U skladu s nacionalnim provedbenim propisima i upravnom praksom odlučit će se za koji se jezik razumno pretpostavlja da ga državljanin treće zemlje razumije.
impact of regularisation measures on migration pattern of prospective (irregular) migrants,
Ta se procjena može izvršiti na isti način i na temelju istih kriterija kao u postupku azila (članak 12.
likelihood of secondary movements within Schengen area.
Direktive o postupcima azila, članak 22. preinačene Direktive o kvalifikaciji i članak 5.
The procedural safeguards listed in Articles 12 (form and translation) and Article 13 (effective remedy and free legal aid) of the Return Directive are express manifestations of the fundamental rights to good administration, to be heard, to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, all forming an integral part of the European Union legal order.
Direktive o uvjetima prihvata), istodobno uzimajući u obzir činjenicu da su zbog složenih postupaka azila zahtjevi za prijevod u tom području možda stroži nego u području vraćanja.
Observance of those rights is thus required also with regard to detention decisions.
U skladu s pravnom stečevinom o azilu države članice moraju poduzeti sve razumne napore da osiguraju prijevod na jezik koji predmetna osoba stvarno razumije, a nedostupnost prevoditelja može biti valjani razlog samo u slučaju vrlo rijetkih jezika za koje objektivno nema dovoljno prevoditelja.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 15(1)
Mogućnost uporabe predložaka u svrhu racionalizacije rada uprave nije ograničena na područje primjene članka 12. stavka 3. (vidjeti u nastavku).
Unless other sufficient but less coercive measures can be applied effectively in a specific case, Member States may only keep in detention a third-country national who is the subject of return procedures in order to prepare the return and/or carry out the removal process, in particular when:
Ako predložak omogućuje davanje prilagođenog prijevoda odluke na jezik koji osoba razumije ili za koji se opravdano pretpostavlja da ga razumije, takav prijevod u skladu je s člankom 12. stavkom 2.
there is a risk of absconding; or
Direktive o vraćanju i nema potrebe upotrijebiti odstupanje iz članka 12. stavka 3.