natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See, in particular, Judgment of the Court of 17 September 1980, Philip Morris v Commission, C-730/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:209, paragraph 11; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2001, Ferring, C-53/00, ECLI:EU:C:2001:627, paragraph 21; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 2004, Italy v Commission, C-372/97, ECLI:EU:C:2004:234, paragraph 44.
Godišnja bespovratna sredstva u iznosu do 150 milijuna EUR dodijeljena u razdoblju od 2011. do 2013. u korist TRAINOSE-a čine državnu potporu spojivu s unutarnjim tržištem na temelju članka 107. stavka 3. točke (b) Ugovora.
Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 1998, Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission, T-214/95, ECLI:EU:T:1998:77.
Prijenos 593 zaposlenika drugim poslodavcima u javnom sektoru tijekom razdoblja od 2011. do 2013. spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem na temelju članka 107. stavka 3. točke (b) Ugovora.
Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways (OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 1), Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings (OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 26), Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 29).)
Sporazumi o pružanju usluga održavanja željezničkih vozila, zakupa željezničkih vozila, osposobljavanja osoblja, najma ureda i najma autobusa ne čine državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 establishing a European Railway Agency (Agency Regulation) (OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 1), Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community's railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive) (OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 44), Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 114) and Directive 2004/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways (OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 164).
Ugovora.
A third package was adopted in 2007 comprising Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1), Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on rail passengers' rights and obligations (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 14), Directive 2007/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Communities railways, and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 44) and Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system in the Community (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 51).
Članak 3.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003, Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdenburg, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 77-81.
Ova je Odluka upućena Helenskoj Republici.
See, for instance, Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1990, Belgium v Commission (‘Tubemeuse’), C-142/87, ECLI:EU:C:1990:125, paragraph 29; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1991, Italy v Commission (‘ALFA Romeo’), C-305/89, ECLI:EU:C:1991:142, paragraphs 18 and 19; Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 1998, Cityflyer Express v Commission, T-16/96, ECLI:EU:T:1998:78, paragraph 51; Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 1999, Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke and Lech-Stahlwerke v Commission, Joined Cases T-129/95, T-2/96 and T-97/96, ECLI:EU:T:1999:7, paragraph 104; Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2003, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99, ECLI:EU:T:2003:57.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 16. lipnja 2017.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 June 2012, Commission v EDF, C-124/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraphs 79, 80 and 81; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 July 1986, Belgium v Commission, 234/84, ECLI:EU:C:1986:302, paragraph 14; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 July 1986, Belgium v Commission, 40/85, ECLI:EU:C:1986:305, paragraph 13; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 September 1994, Spain v Commission, Joined Cases C-278/92 to C-280/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:325, paragraph 22; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 28 January 2003, Germany v Commission, C-334/99, ECLI:EU:C:2003:55, paragraph 134; Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2003, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99, ECLI:EU:T:2003:57; Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2008, Kahla Thüringen Porzellan v Commission, T-20/03, ECLI:EU:T:2008:395; Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2002, Linde v Commission, T-98/00, ECLI:EU:T:2002:248.
Za Komisiju
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 June 2012, Commission v EDF, C-124/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraphs 83, 84 and 85 and 105; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 May 2002, France v Commission (Stardust), C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, paragraphs 71 and 72; Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 1998, Cityflyer Express v Commission, T-16/96, ECLI:EU:T:1998:78, paragraph 76.
Članica Komisije
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 June 2012, Commission v EDF, C-124/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraphs 82 to 85 and 105.
SL C 272, 15.9.2011., str. 7.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 June 2012, Commission v EDF, C-124/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraphs 85.
EBITDA znači dobit prije kamata, poreza i amortizacije; EBT znači dobit prije poreza.
See Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2007, Scott v Commission, T-366/00, ECLI:EU:T:2007:99, paragraph 134, and Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 December 2010, Seydaland Vereinigte Agrarbetriebe, C-239/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:778, paragraph 39.
Memorandum o razumijevanju o specifičnim uvjetima gospodarske politike, 3. svibnja 2010.
See Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2004, Valmont Nederland BV v Commission, T-274/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:266, paragraph 71.
Na temelju početnog rasporeda natječajni postupak za TRAINOSE trebao se pokrenuti u četvrtom tromjesečju 2012. i njegova imovina trebala se prenijeti u grčki fond za privatizaciju.
The IRR is not based on accounting earnings in a given year, but takes into account the stream of future cash flows that the investor expects to receive over the entire lifetime of the investment.
HRADF je uspostavljen u skladu sa Zakonom 3986/2011 o hitnim mjerama za provedbu srednjoročnog okvira fiskalne strategije za 2012.–2015., Službeni list grčke vlade A'152 /1.7.2011.
It is defined as the discount rate for which the NPV of a stream of cash flows equals zero.
Odluka br. 226 Međuministarskog odbora za restrukturiranje imovine i privatizaciju („ICARP”) od 18. siječnja 2013.
The NPV is the difference between the positive and negative cash flows over the lifetime of the investment, discounted at the appropriate return (the cost of capital).
Odluka ICARP-a br. 232 od 5. travnja 2013.
See recital 14.
(Službeni list grčke vlade B'803/5.4.2013.).
See recital 15.
Podnesak Grčke od 27. ožujka 2017., str. 1.
See Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 April 2014, ING Groep NV, C-224/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:213, paragraphs 29 to 37.
Uredba (EZ) br. 1370/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. listopada 2007. o uslugama javnog željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza putnika i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba Vijeća (EEZ) br. 1191/69 i br. 1107/70 (SL L 315, 3.12.2007., str. 1.).
See, to that effect, Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2000, Alitalia v Commission, T-296/97, ECLI:EU:T:2000:289, or Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 January 2013, Frucona v Commission, C-73/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:32, paragraphs 79 and 80.
Povjerljive informacije.
See recital 119.
SL C 249, 31.7.2014., str. 1.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 July 1996, SFEI and Others, C-39/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, paragraph 60; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 1999, Spain v Commission, C-342/96, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210, paragraph 41.
Grčki Zakon 674/1970, grčki Kraljevski dekret 404/1972, grčki Zakonodavni dekret 1300/1972 i grčki Zakon 2671/1998 (Službeni list grčke vlade A'289/28.12.1998.).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 March 1994, Banco Exterior de España, C-387/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:100, paragraph 13; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2000, Germany v Commission, C-156/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:467, paragraph 25; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 May 1999, Italy v Commission, C-6/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:251, paragraph 15; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 March 2005, Heiser, C-172/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130, paragraph 36.
Podnesak Grčke od 27. ožujka 2017., str. 1.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 July 1974, Italy v Commission, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, paragraph 13.
Spojeni predmeti 106/87 do 120/87 Asteris i drugi protiv Grčke i EEZ-a [1988.]
Commission Decision 2012/540/EU of 20 December 2011 on State aid C 25/08 (ex NN 23/08) reform of the arrangements for financing the retirement pensions of civil servants working for France Télécom implemented by the French Republic in favour of France Télécom (OJ L 279, 12.10.2012, p. 1); confirmed by Judgment of the Court of 26 October 2016 in Case C-211/15 P, Orange (France Télécom) v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2016:798 and Judgment of the Court of 22 October 2014 in Case C-620/13 P BT plc v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2309.
ECLI:EU:C:1988:457, točke 24.–25.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 June 2012, Commission v EDF, C-124/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraphs 83, 84 and 85 and 105; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 May 2002, France v Commission (Stardust), C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, paragraphs 71 and 72; Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 1998, Cityflyer Express v Commission, T-16/96, ECLI:EU:T:1998:78, paragraph 76.
Predmet C-303/88, Italija protiv Komisije [1991.]
See Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2014, Sarc v Commission, T-488/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:497, paragraph 98.
ECLI:EU:C:1991:136.
Commission Notice on the notion of State aid as referred to in Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2016/C 262/01), point 97.
Predmet T-157/01, Danske Busvognmaend protiv Komisije, [2004.]
See Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2003, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99, ECLI:EU:T:2003:57, paragraph 251.
ECLI:EU:T:2004:76.
See Bank of Greece, The real estate market: developments and prospect, Annual Report 2010 (April 2011) https://www.bankofgreece.gr/BogDocumentEn/Governor%27s_AnnualReport2010,April2011ChapterV,S,ection2.pdf
SEK je bio subjekt u javnom sektoru koji je osnovan 1920. i obavljao je djelatnost na većini grčkih željezničkih linija do 31. prosinca 1970., kad su sve željeznice u Grčkoj, osim privatnih industrijskih linija i E.I.S.-a, prenesene na novoosnovano društvo u državnom vlasništvu, Hellenic Railways Organisation S.A., odnosno OSE.
Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2004, Fleuren Compost v Commission, T-109/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4.
Službeni list grčke vlade A'188/4.1.2010.
SA.34044 (2011/N)*EL*Prolongation of the Greek temporary scheme for loan guarantees (OJ C 29, 2.2.2012, p. 4.
Podnesak Grčke od 27. ožujka 2017., str. 2.
Commission Decision of 5 February 2013 in SA.34986 (2012/NN) — Greece — Liquidity support in the energy sector — DEPA, not yet published in OJ — further extended in SA.36871 (2013/NN), DEPA Liquidity support extension (OJ C 348, 3.10.2014, p. 1) and Commission Decision of 31 July 2014 in SA.36323 — Greece — Liquidity Support to Greek PPC (2013/NN) (OJ C 348, 3.10.2014, p. 7).
Službeni list grčke vlade A'212/17.12.2010.
Commission Decision of 19 December 2016 in State aid case SA.46955 (2016/N) — Greece — Prolongation of the State Guarantee Scheme (Art. 2 law 3723/2008), not yet published in the OJ.
Direktiva Komisije 2014/106/EU оd 5. prosinca 2014. o izmjeni priloga V. i VI.
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/05/25/eurogroup-statement-greece/
Direktivi 2008/57/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o interoperabilnosti željezničkog sustava unutar Zajednice (SL L 355, 12.12.2014., str. 42.).
Commission Decision in State aid case SA.32543 (2011/N) — Measures in favour of OSE group (not yet published in the OJ).
Regulatorno tijelo za željeznice (Ρυθμιστική Αρχή Σιδηροδρόμων ili RAS).
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/eurogroup/2017/03/20/
Odluka Vijeća 88/167/EEZ od 7. listopada 1987. o Zakonu 1386/1983 kojim grčka vlada dodjeljuje potporu grčkoj industriji (SL L 76, 22.3.1988, str. 18.).
Greece was therefore especially vulnerable to the 2008/09 global financial and economic crises.
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 od 13. srpnja 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
The average capital adequacy ratio of Greek banks improved to 11,7 % at the end of 2009, partly thanks to public capital injections.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 248, 24.9.2015., str. 9.).
In April 2010, Greece asked for official financial assistance which resulted in the conclusion of the MoU 2010.
Presuda Suda od 16. svibnja 2002., Francuska protiv Komisije („Stardust Marine”), C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294.
Due the systemic importance of the Greek railway sector and its direct dependence on the Greek State budget, the MoU imposed the restructuring of the entire Greek railway sector as a condition for the payment of the financial aid requested by Greece.
Stardust Marine, točka 51. i dalje.
Therefore, the selective economic advantage granted through the planned debt cancellation in favour of TRAINOSE strengthens its economic position, as it will relieve the railway operator from debts incurred in the period 2007-2010.
Direktiva Komisije 2006/111/EZ od 16. studenoga 2006. o transparentnosti financijskih odnosa između država članica i javnih poduzeća, kao i o financijskoj transparentnosti unutar određenih poduzeća (SL L 318, 17.11.2006., str. 17.).
Consequently, TRAINOSE will be providing railway transport services in the internal market without bearing all of the relevant investment and/or operating costs in the past.
Presuda Suda od 11. srpnja 1996., Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) i drugi protiv La Poste i drugih, C-39/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, točka 60.; presuda Suda od 29. travnja 1999., Kraljevina Španjolska protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, C-342/96, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210, točka 41.; presuda Suda od 16. svibnja 2002., Francuska protiv Komisije („Stardust Marine”), C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, točka 69.
The Privatisation Programme is laid down in Table II of Chapter B' of Law 3985/2011 on Mid-Term Fiscal Strategy Framework 2012-2015.
Presuda Suda od 24. srpnja 2003., Altmark Trans i Regierungspräsidium Magdenburg, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, točke od 77. do 81.
It has 655 full time employees, possessing significant accumulated rail experience and expertise in the railway sector.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 14.
Greece already has one of the highest unemployment rates in the EU (23 %), and if TRAINOSE were to cease its operations, this situation would obviously become even worse.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 15.
OSE is 100 % owned by the Greek State.
Vidjeti presudu Suda od 3. travnja 2014., ING Groep NV, C-224/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:213, točke od 29. do 37.
Therefore, it is clearly a public undertaking within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Commission Directive 2006/111/EC.
Vidjeti u tom smislu presudu Općeg suda od 12. prosinca 2000., Alitalia protiv Komisije, T-296/97, ECLI:EU:T:2000:289, ili presudu Suda od 24. siječnja 2013., Frucona protiv Komisije, C-73/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:32, točke 79. i 80.
Alternatively, to quantify the possible advantage stemming from the transfer of employees, Greece provided a study prepared by a consultant.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 119.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/1041
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2018/1041
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 207 and 212, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a), thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegove članke 207. i 212. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 6. točkom (a),
Under the terms of Article 6(2) of the Act of Accession, Croatia's accession to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, is to be agreed by means of a Protocol to the Agreement.
Na temelju članka 6. stavka 2.
A simplified procedure is to apply whereby the Protocol is to be concluded by the Council, acting unanimously on behalf of the Member States, and by the third countries concerned.
Akta o pristupanju, o pristupanju Hrvatske Okvirnom sporazumu između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane, odlučit će se putem Protokola uz Sporazum.
The negotiations with the Republic of Korea were successfully concluded and the Protocol was signed on behalf of the Union and its Member States in Brussels on 21 June 2017.
Dana 14. rujna 2012.
The Protocol should therefore be approved,
Vijeće je ovlastilo Komisiju da otvori pregovore s dotičnim trećim zemljama.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Pregovori s Republikom Korejom uspješno su završeni te je Protokol potpisan u ime Unije i njezinih država članica u Bruxellesu dana 21. lipnja 2017..
Article 1
Protokol bi stoga trebalo odobriti,
The Protocol to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the Union and its Member States.
DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, give the notification provided for in Article 4(1) of the Protocol.
Odobrava se, u ime Europske unije i njezinih država članica, Protokol uz Okvirni sporazum između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane, kako bi se uzelo u obzir pristupanje Republike Hrvatske Uniji.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Predsjednik Vijeća u ime Unije i njezinih država članica izdaje obavijest predviđenu člankom 4. stavkom 1.
Done at Brussels, 13 July 2018.
Protokola.
Consent of the European Parliament given on 3 May 2018.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 13. srpnja 2018.
OJ L 20, 23.1.2013, p. 2.
Za Vijeće
Council Decision (EU) 2018/902 of 21 April 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, and provisional application of a Protocol to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (OJ L 161, 26.6.2018, p. 1).
Predsjednik
The Protocol has been published in OJ L 161 of 26.6.2018, p. 3 together with the Decision on signature.
Suglasnost Europskog parlamenta od 3. svibnja 2018.
of 23 July 2018
оd 23. srpnja 2018.
(notified under document C(2018) 4795)
(priopćeno pod brojem dokumenta C(2018) 4795)
Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 also lays down that the measures to be applied in the protection and surveillance zones, as provided for in Article 29(1) and Article 31 of Directive 2005/94/EC, are to be maintained until at least the dates for those zones set out in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
Provedbenom odlukom (EU) 2017/247 predviđeno je da zaražena i ugrožena područja koja su uspostavila nadležna tijela u predmetnim državama članicama u skladu s Direktivom 2005/94/EZ obuhvaćaju barem područja koja su u Prilogu toj provedbenoj odluci navedena kao zaražena i ugrožena.
The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 was last amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/894, following the notification by Bulgaria of a new outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in a poultry holding in the Dobrich region of that Member State.
Direktive 2005/94/EZ uspostavljaju u predmetnim državama članicama nakon jednog ili više slučajeva izbijanja visokopatogene influence ptica i određuje trajanje mjera koje se primjenjuju na tim područjima.
Since the date of the last amendment made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 by Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/894, Bulgaria has notified the Commission of a further outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5 in a poultry holding again in the Dobrich region of that Member State.
Nadalje, Prilog Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2017/247 više je puta izmijenjen, ponajprije kako bi se u obzir uzele izmjene granica zaraženih i ugroženih područja koja su uspostavile predmetne države članice u skladu s Direktivom 2005/94/EZ.
Bulgaria has also notified the Commission that it has taken the necessary measures required in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC following that new outbreak, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around the infected poultry holding in that Member State.
Prilog Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2017/247 zadnji je put izmijenjen Provedbenom odlukom Komisije (EU) 2018/894 nakon što je Bugarska Komisiji prijavila novi slučaj izbijanja visokopatogene influence ptica podtipa H5N8 na gospodarstvu za uzgoj peradi u regiji Dobrich u toj državi članici.
The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with Bulgaria, and the Commission is satisfied that the boundaries of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority of Bulgaria, are at a sufficient distance to the poultry holding where the new outbreak was confirmed.
Bugarska je obavijestila Komisiju i da je nakon tog novog slučaja izbijanja bolesti propisno poduzela potrebne mjere u skladu s Direktivom 2005/94/EZ, uključujući uspostavu zaraženih i ugroženih područja oko zaraženog gospodarstva za uzgoj peradi.
In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union, and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at Union level, in collaboration with Bulgaria, the protection and surveillance zones established in Bulgaria, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, following the new outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in that Member State.
Od datuma zadnje izmjene Provedbene odluke (EU) 2017/247 Provedbenom odlukom (EU) 2018/894 Bugarska je Komisiji prijavila novi slučaj izbijanja visokopatogene influence ptica podtipa H5 na gospodarstvu za uzgoj peradi ponovno u regiji Dobrich u toj državi članici.
Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 should therefore be updated to take account of the up-to-date epidemiological situation in Bulgaria, as regards highly pathogenic avian influenza.
Bugarska je obavijestila Komisiju i da je nakon tog novog slučaja izbijanja bolesti poduzela potrebne mjere u skladu s Direktivom 2005/94/EZ, uključujući uspostavu zaraženih i ugroženih područja oko zaraženog gospodarstva za uzgoj peradi u toj državi članici.