natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This circumstance would in any event be irrelevant to the assessment of economic continuity between SEAH and Airport Handling.
Italija je tvrdila da se činjenica da je u poslovnom planu društva Airport Handling predviđen tržišni udjel od […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
In that respect, Italy recalled that the current portfolio of clients of Airport Handling is different from that of SEAH.
, kao takva, ne može smatrati dokazom gospodarskog kontinuiteta.
Rather, Airport Handling would have concluded certain contracts with air carriers that were not already customers of SEAH, whilst at the same time failed to retain some of the former customers of SEAH.
Taj bi se tržišni udjel trebao ocijeniti u odnosu na cilj društva Airport Handling, odnosno ostvarivanje održivosti u srednjoročnom razdoblju.
Italy stated that the fact that the business plan of Airport Handling provides for a market share […] [8] Business secret.
Italija je navela i da Airport Handling nije uključen u postupak prodaje imovine SEAH-a te da, stoga, nije došlo do prijenosa imovine između tih dvaju društava.
cannot, as such, be considered proof of economic continuity.
Nadalje, Italija smatra da sama činjenica da se imovina korisnika potpore iznajmljuje trećem poduzetniku ne može biti dovoljan dokaz da je potonji ostvario konkurentsku prednost povezanu s tom potporom.
Such market share should be assessed in the light of the objective pursued by Airport Handling of reaching viability in the medium term.
Prema mišljenju Italije, kako bi to predstavljalo kontinuitet, ta se imovina mora iznajmiti po cijeni nižoj od tržišne cijene.
Italy also submitted that Airport Handling is not involved in the procedure for the sale of SEAH’s assets and, therefore, there would be no transfer of assets between the two companies.
Međutim, u ovom je predmetu cijenu najma odredilo neovisno društvo (IMQ).
Furthermore, in Italy’s view the mere fact that the assets of the beneficiary of the aid are leased to a third undertaking cannot constitute sufficient evidence that the latter enjoyed the competitive advantage linked to the aid.
Italija je podsjetila i da se vlasnička struktura društva SEA znatno razlikuje od razdoblja kad je navodna potpora dodijeljena SEAH-u.
In Italy’s view, for this to constitute an indication of continuity, the lease of those assets must take place at a price below the market price.
Dok je u razdoblju 2002.–2010.
In this case, however, the lease price would have been determined by an independent company (IMQ).
SEA bila u potpunosti u vlasništvu države, trenutačno privatni ulagač F2i drži 44,31 % njezina kapitala.
Italy also recalled that SEA’s shareholding differs significantly from the period when the alleged aid was granted to SEAH.
Nadalje, Italija smatra da je osnivanje Trusta dodatno jamstvo diskontinuiteta između SEAH-a i društva Airport Handling.
While SEA was entirely State-owned in the period 2002-2010, a private investor, F2i, currently owns 44,31 % of its capital.
Naime, kako je utvrđeno u ugovoru o trustu, djelatnosti upravitelja trebale bi biti ključne u postizanju sljedećih ciljeva:
Furthermore, in Italy’s view the setting-up of the Trust constitutes an additional guarantee of the absence of continuity between SEAH and Airport Handling.
osigurati neovisno upravljanje udjelom društva SEA u društvu Airport Handling, preuzimanjem isključive kontrole nad društvom i time osiguranjem nepostojanja interesa i/ili protoka informacija između društva Airport Handling i grupe SEA, uz posebno upućivanje na SEAH i zemaljske usluge koje je potonji prethodno pružao u milanskim zračnim lukama,
ensure the independent management of SEA’s participation in Airport Handling, assuming sole control over the company and thus ensuring the absence of any interest and/or information flow between Airport Handling and the SEA group, with particular reference to SEAH and handling activities previously carried out by the latter at Milan airports,
U tom svojstvu upravitelj ima punu i stvarnu kontrolu nad udjelom društva SEA u društvu Airport Handling.
allow the entry into the capital of Airport Handling of new private investors not connected to the SEA group, as a first step not less than […] [8] Business secret. %.
Kao jedini dioničar društva Airport Handling upravitelj, među ostalim, mora:
As a result of the transfer of 100 % of SEA’s shareholding in Airport Handling to the Trust, the Trustee was entered in the business register as sole shareholder of the company.
prava glasa u pogledu imenovanja upravljačkih tijela društva Airport Handling ostvarivati neovisno i bez uplitanja društva SEA tako da osigura da članovi tih tijela nemaju ili da nisu imali operativne uloge u društvu SEA ili SEAH-u i da nisu ovisni o njima.
In this capacity, the Trustee has full and substantial control over SEA’s participation in Airport Handling.
U trenutku prijenosa udjela društva SEA na Trust svi članovi upravljačkih tijela društva Airport Handling koje je imenovala SEA dali su otkaz i zamijenjeni su članovima koje je imenovao upravitelj,
As sole shareholder of Airport Handling the Trustee must, inter alia:
pratiti gospodarski diskontinuitet između SEAH-a i društva Airport Handling, zahtijevajući redovita izvješća o upravljanju društvom, točnoj provedbi poslovnog plana, tržišnom udjelu i izgledima za razvoj,
Exercise voting rights on the appointment of the managing bodies of Airport Handling independently and without any interference by SEA, and in such a way as to ensure that the members of those bodies do not have or have not had operational roles or dependence on SEA or SEAH.
osigurati uspostavu postupaka kako bi se spriječila neopravdana korist društvu Airport Handling od informacija koje ima SEA pri stjecanju ili zadržavanju ugovora sa zračnim prijevoznicima ili dobavljačima robe ili usluga,
At the moment of the transfer of SEA’s participation to the Trust, all members of the managing bodies of Airport Handling appointed by SEA handed in their resignation and were replaced by those appointed by the Trustee.
potvrditi nepostojanje prodajnih transakcija između SEAH-a i društva Airport Handling.
Monitor the economic discontinuity between SEAH and Airport Handling, requesting regular reports on the management of the company, the correct implementation of the business plan, the market share and development prospects.
Državna sredstva i pripisivost državi
Ensure that procedures are in place to prevent that Airport Handling unduly benefits from information held by SEA in the acquisition or maintenance of contracts with air carriers or suppliers of goods or services.
Italija smatra da se na temelju statusa društva SEA kao javnog poduzetnika ne može zaključiti da njegova sredstva ispunjuju uvjete za državna sredstva u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
Verify that no sale transaction has taken place between SEAH and Airport Handling.
Ugovora.
On States resources and imputability
U tom je pogledu Italija podsjetila da SEA ne posjeduje financijska sredstva društva Airport Handling niti ima kontrolu nad njima jer njezinim udjelom u društvu Airport Handling upravlja neovisno tijelo, Trust, potpuno neovisno od društva SEA.
In Italy’s view, SEA’s status as a public undertaking is not sufficient to conclude that its resources qualify as State resources within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
SEA stoga ne bi mogla izvršavati uobičajene ovlasti većinskog dioničara, odnosno, među ostalim, ovlast imenovanja članova upravljačkih tijela društva kćeri i, stoga, imati odlučujuću ulogu u upravljanju društvom.
In that respect, Italy recalled that Airport Handling’s financial resources are not in the possession or under the control of SEA, as its participation in Airport Handling is being managed by an independent body, the Trust, in total independence from SEA.
Prema mišljenju Italije Komisija ne može donijeti zaključak o pripisivosti osporavane mjere državi samo na temelju činjenice da je izrazito nevjerojatno da bi se te mjere poduzele bez uplitanja države.
SEA would therefore not have the possibility to exercise typical majority-shareholder powers, namely, inter alia, the power to appoint the members of the managing bodies of the subsidiary and, therefore, to participate in a decisive manner to the management of the company.
Prema mišljenju Italije Komisija je obvezna zadovoljiti visok standard dokaza.
According to Italy, the Commission cannot infer the imputability of the contested measures to the State by the mere fact that it is highly unlikely that those measures have been taken without any intervention by the State.
Predmetne mjere mogu se smatrati pripisivima državi samo u mjeri u kojoj je javni dioničar društva SEA imao ključnu ulogu u donošenju odluke o dokapitalizaciji u korist društva Airport Handling.
According to Italy, the Commission is required to meet a high standard of proof.
U tom smislu Italija smatra da je važno napomenuti da se u članku 15. statuta društva SEA, među ostalim, navodi da za povećanje kapitala društava kćeri mora glasovati najmanje šest od sedam članova, za što je potreban pristanak upravitelja koje je imenovao privatni dioničar F2i.
The measures at hand may be deemed imputable to the State only to the extent that the public shareholder of SEA played a key role in the adoption of the capital injection in favour of Airport Handling.
Stoga, bez obzira na vlasništvo društva SEA nad većinskim udjelom, javni dioničar ne može valjano razmatrati dokapitalizaciju bez traženja pristanka (ili odlučujućeg glasa) direktora koje je imenovao taj privatni dioničar.
In this sense, Italy considers it is important to note that Article 15 of SEA’s by-laws provides that the deliberations relating, inter alia, to the increase in capital of subsidiaries must be taken with the favourable vote of at least six members out of seven, which requires the consent of administrators appointed by the private shareholder F2i.
Nadalje, Italija je navela da su izjave kao što su izjave ministra za infrastrukturu i promet kojima je umirivao zaposlenike, a koje je Komisija citirala u odluci o pokretanju postupka, u potpunosti u skladu s europskom i talijanskom praksom te da se, stoga, ne mogu upotrijebiti kao dokaz pripisivosti te mjere državi.
Consequently, irrespective of their ownership of the majority of the shares of SEA, the public shareholder cannot validly deliberate a capital increase without recourse to consent (or rather, the decisive vote) of directors appointed by the private shareholder.
Predmetne izjave moraju se smatrati političkim izjavama kojima je cilj umanjiti negativne učinke nezaposlenosti.
Furthermore, Italy submitted that statements such as those made by the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport to reassure workers, quoted by the Commission in the opening decision, are fully in line with European and Italian practice and, therefore cannot be used as proof of the imputability to the State of the measure.
Na temelju toga Italija smatra da se ulaganje društva SEA u Airport Handling ne može pripisati državi i da ne uključuje državna sredstva te da, stoga, ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The statements in question must be regarded as political declarations intended to mitigate adverse effects of unemployment.
Ugovora.
On this basis, Italy considers that SEA’s investment in Airport Handling is not imputable to the State and does not involve State resources and thus does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
4.2.2.
On the existence of an economic advantage
Postojanje gospodarske prednosti
Italy recalled that the private shareholder contributes to capital injections in proportion to the share of the capital held at SEA, 44,31 %.
Italija je podsjetila da je privatni dioničar unio kapital razmjeran udjelu kapitala koji drži SEA, odnosno 44,31 %.
According to Italy, the participation of the private investor F2i has a real economic impact and is significant.
Prema mišljenju Italije udio privatnog ulagača F2i ima stvaran ekonomski učinak i značajan je.
In this respect, Italy considers it important to note that according to the Commission’s practice, private investment of around one third of the total investment was considered significant.
U tom pogledu Italija smatra da je važno napomenuti da se, u skladu s Komisijinom praksom, privatno ulaganje od oko jedne trećine ukupnog ulaganja smatralo značajnim.
In Italy’s view this is in itself sufficient to exclude the State aid qualification within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty of the capital injection.
Prema mišljenju Italije to je samo po sebi dovoljno da se isključi definiranje te dokapitalizacije kao državne potpore u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
Second, Italy submits that the business plan of Airport Handling was evaluated by an independent expert who concluded that SEA’s investment is justified from a purely economic point of view and therefore complies with the market economy investor principle.
Ugovora.
On this basis Italy considers that the SEA’s investment in Airport Handling was made in circumstances that would be acceptable to a private investor operating under normal market conditions and that, therefore, the measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Drugo, Italija je navela da je poslovni plan društva Airport Handling ocijenio neovisni stručnjak koji je zaključio da je ulaganje društva SEA opravdano s isključivo ekonomskog stajališta i da je, stoga, u skladu s načelom ulagača u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
Na temelju toga Italija smatra da je ulaganje društva SEA u Airport Handling izvršeno u okolnostima koje bi bile prihvatljive privatnom ulagaču koji posluje u uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima i da, stoga, mjera ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The Commission received comments from SEAH (in liquidation), the Milan Airport Handling Trust and Airport Handling, SEA and an interested party which asked for anonymity.
Ugovora.
Comments from the Milan Airport Handling Trust and Airport Handling (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trust’)
PRIMJEDBE ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANA
On the transfer of workforce
SEAH (u likvidaciji), Milan Airport Handling Trust i Airport Handling, SEA i zainteresirana strana koja je zatražila anonimnost dostavili su primjedbe Komisiji.
According to the Trust, Airport Handling has from the beginning of its activity structured its business model based on an economic logic different from that of SEAH, having as objective to operate on the market on a standalone basis and to reach viability without capital interventions from its shareholder.
Primjedbe subjekata Milan Airport Handling Trust i Airport Handling (dalje u tekstu „Trust”)
In particular, Airport Handling always had considered that its business model should follow a modulation of the labour force organised according to criteria of efficiency and relevance.
Prijenos radne snage
According to the Trust the handling activity is characterised by labour peaks at certain times of the year (e.g. summer).
Prema mišljenju predstavnika Trusta od početka svojeg poslovanja Airport Handling temeljio je svoj poslovni model na ekonomskoj logici koja se razlikuje od one SEAH-a te mu je cilj bio poslovati na tržištu samostalno i ostvariti održivost bez intervencija svojeg dioničara u smislu unosa kapitala.
To address those rapid changes in demand, the service provider must respond flexibly, by means of recruiting temporary staff for those periods when the recruitment is justified in relation to the volume of work required.
Konkretno, Airport Handling uvijek je smatrao da bi se u njegovu poslovnom modelu radna snaga organizirana prema kriterijima djelotvornosti i relevantnosti trebala mijenjati.
While SEAH mostly used […] [8] Business secret.
Prema mišljenju predstavnika Trusta za zemaljske usluge uobičajeni su vrhunci potrebe za radnom snagom u određenom razdoblju tijekom godine (npr. ljeti).
([…] [8] Business secret.
Kako bi se zadovoljile te brze promjene potražnje, pružatelj usluga mora fleksibilno reagirati zapošljavanjem osoblja na određeno vrijeme za ta razdoblja kad je zapošljavanje opravdano s obzirom na potrebni obujam posla.
), Airport Handling has adopted an approach based on […] [8] Business secret.
Dok je SEAH uglavnom koristio […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Although this would require more complex training, management and coordination activities, it would in turn lead to higher flexibility and, consequently, a drop in operating costs.
([…] [8] Poslovna tajna.
According to the Trust, this allowed for […] [8] Business secret.
), Airport Handling usvojio je pristup koji se temelji na […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
(On 31 December 2014, Airport Handling had […] [8] Business secret.
Iako bi za to trebale složenije aktivnosti obuke, upravljanja i koordinacije, to bi, s druge strane, dovelo do veće fleksibilnosti i, stoga, do pada operativnih troškova.
The Trust submitted that there was no transfer of employment contracts between SEAH and Airport Handling, as demonstrated by the following circumstances:
Prema mišljenju predstavnika Trusta time je omogućeno […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
Airport Handling recruited its staff according to a plan defined in complete autonomy, according to expected traffic volumes and the specific organisation of work, thereby achieving a significant reduction of the workforce compared with SEAH,
(31. prosinca 2014.
former employees of SEAH were recruited by Airport Handling based on conditions that are formally and substantially different, according to a business model different from that of SEAH.
Airport Handling imao je […] [8] Poslovna tajna.
In addition, the Trust recalled the climate of strong opposition and the very difficult relations with the trade union organisations in June 2014.
Trust je naveo da nije bilo prijenosa ugovora o radu između SEAH-a i društva Airport Handling, što se dokazuje sljedećim okolnostima:
It is in the Trust’s view evident that if indeed Airport Handling would have re-employed former SEAH employees based on the same conditions, those employees would have had no reason to complain.
u društvu Airport Handling osoblje se zapošljavalo u skladu s planom koji je utvrđen potpuno neovisno, u skladu s očekivanim obujmom prometa i specifičnom organizacijom rada, čime je ostvareno znatno smanjenje radne snage u usporedbi sa SEAH-om,
On the contrary, the strong resistance of trade unions to the agreement of June 2014 would evidence the fact that the workers were fully aware that their employment conditions had deteriorated.
bivši zaposlenici SEAH-a zaposleni u društvu Airport Handling na temelju uvjeta koji su formalno i materijalno drukčiji, u skladu s poslovnim modelom koji se razlikuje od SEAH-a.
On the contracts with the air carriers
Uz to, Trust je podsjetio na snažno protivljenje i vrlo teške odnose sa sindikalnim organizacijama u lipnju 2014.
First, the Trust submitted that the contracts with the air carriers are by nature not transferable to third parties.
Prema mišljenju predstavnika Trusta očito je da, da su se u društvu Airport Handling doista ponovno zaposlili bivši zaposlenici SEAH-a na temelju istih uvjeta, ti zaposlenici ne bi imali razloga za pritužbe.
Article 3.2 of the Standard Ground Handling Agreement expressly provides that, save in exceptional cases to be agreed with the ground handling companies, the carrier cannot assign tasks to third parties under the contract:
Naprotiv, snažan otpor sindikata sporazumu iz lipnja 2014. dokaz je da su radnici u potpunosti bili svjesni da su se njihovi uvjeti zapošljavanja pogoršali.
‘The carrier shall not appoint any other person, company or organisation to provide the services which the handling company has agreed to provide by virtue of this Agreement, except in such special cases as shall be mutually agreed between the parties’.
Ugovori sa zračnim prijevoznicima
The Trust provided several statements by airlines which had not carried out a tender procedure within the meaning of the public procurement procedures, in order to select Airport Handling as ground handler.
Prvo, Trust je naveo da se ugovori sa zračnim prijevoznicima po svojoj prirodi ne mogu prenijeti na treće strane.
Those airlines indicated that Airport Handling had however been selected on the basis of a competitive procedure based on benchmarking with other ground handling providers.
U članku 3.2.
In addition, the Trust recalled that the duration of the handling agreement is set by the air carrier and often provides for the possibility for the latter to withdraw by notice.
Standardnog sporazuma o zemaljskim uslugama izričito se navodi da, osim u iznimnim slučajevima koji će se dogovoriti s društvima za zemaljske usluge, prijevoznik ne može prenijeti zadaće na treće strane na temelju ugovora:
For instance the IATA standard contract provides that each party may terminate the contract with a 60 days’ notice.
„Prijevoznik ne smije imenovati nijednu drugu osobu, društvo ili organizaciju za pružanje usluga koje je društvo za zemaljske usluge suglasno izvršiti na temelju ovog Sporazuma, osim u posebnim slučajevima koje će strane zajedno dogovoriti”.
Therefore, the contract with the air carrier is not necessarily a long lasting contract based on which the handler may be sheltered from competition.
Trust je dostavio nekoliko izjava zračnih prijevoznika koji nisu proveli natječajni postupak u smislu postupaka javne nabave kako bi odabrali Airport Handling kao pružatelja zemaljskih usluga.
In fact, carriers may withdraw from the contract if they obtain better conditions from other service providers.
Ti su zračni prijevoznici naveli da je Airport Handling neovisno o tome izabran na temelju natjecateljskog postupka koji se temelji na uspoređivanju s drugim pružateljima zemaljskih usluga.
According to the Trust, when SEAH exited the market and Airport Handling negotiated new contracts with the air carriers, the latter proposed to Airport Handling, as well as to the other service providers contacted, different — more favourable — conditions than those obtained from SEAH.
Uz to, Trust je podsjetio da trajanje sporazuma o pružanju zemaljskih usluga određuje zračni prijevoznik i da je često predviđena mogućnost potonjeg da se povuče uz otkazni rok.
It is, according to the Trust, quite common that an air carrier decides to terminate the contract when it receives more favourable conditions from other competing handlers; or threatens the continuation of the contract if the current handler is not willing improve its offer as compared to that of other providers.
Na primjer, u standardnom ugovoru IATA-e navodi se da svaka strana može raskinuti ugovor uz otkazni rok od 60 dana.
Airport Handling started its activity at Milan airports on 1 September 2014, after SEA’s shareholding was transferred to the Trust.
Stoga ugovor sa zračnim prijevoznikom nije nužno dugotrajni ugovor na temelju kojeg se pružatelj zemaljskih usluga može zaštititi od konkurencije.
Although Airport Handling initially notified to ENAC and to the air carriers the start of its activity on 1 July 2014, the delays arising from the transfer of the shares to the Trust and the difficulties with the trade unions have further delayed this launch of operations to 1 September 2014.
De facto, zračni prijevoznici mogu se povući iz ugovora ako dobiju bolje uvjete od drugih pružatelja usluga.
On 28 February 2015, Airport Handling had concluded ground handling contracts with […] [8] Business secret.
Prema mišljenju predstavnika Trusta SEAH je izašao s tržišta te je Airport Handling pregovarao o novim ugovorima sa zračnim prijevoznicima.
air carriers, […] [8] Business secret.
Potonji su društvu Airport Handling i drugim kontaktiranim pružateljima usluga predložili drukčije, povoljnije, uvjete od onih koje su dobili od SEAH-a.
operating at Linate and […] [8] Business secret.
Prema mišljenju predstavnika Trusta prilično je uobičajeno da zračni prijevoznik odluči raskinuti ugovor kad dobije povoljnije uvjete od drugih konkurentskih pružatelja zemaljskih usluga ili da prijeti raskidom ugovora ako trenutačni pružatelj zemaljskih usluga ne želi poboljšati svoju ponudu u usporedbi s ponudom drugih pružatelja.
operating at Malpensa.
Airport Handling počeo je poslovati u milanskim zračnim lukama 1. rujna 2014. nakon što je udjel društva SEA prenesen na Trust.