natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Union industry consists of 22 producers which provide users with a wide range of supply already within the Union, in addition to the option of imports from the other third countries which produce and export the like product.
To je u skladu s onim što je Komisija navela u uvodnoj izjavi 457. da bi se proizvođači iz Unije mogli djelomično oporaviti tijekom 2014. i u prvoj polovini 2015.
Therefore, the Commission rejected the claim that the imposition of measures would lead to a shortage of supply of the product concerned/like product.
Kao rezultat toga, druga polovina 2015. bolje odražava stvarni učinak prijetnje štete industriji Unije koji bi trebalo ukloniti.
With regard to any potential negative effects on the competition on the Union market, it is true that the EU competition rules impose more stringent standards of behaviour on a company that has a significant market share.
Treće, stav je Suda da je analiza podataka iz razdoblja nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka osobito primjerena u ispitnom postupku za utvrđivanje postoji li prijetnja štete zbog koje je po njezinoj samoj prirodi potrebna prognostička analiza.
In any event, the Commission is unaware of any abuse of a dominant position on the Union market of the product concerned.
Komisija smatra da druga polovina 2015. bolje odgovara tom zahtjevu jer je vremenski bliže budućim kretanjima od cijelog RIP-a.
However, and in any event, it is ultimately up to the competent competition authorities to determine whether there is a dominant position and whether it is abused.
Četvrto, izračunom na temelju cijelog razdoblja ispitnog postupka, neovisno o tome jesu li postojali znakovi negativnih kretanja, doveo bi se u pitanje cilj da se u slučaju prijetnje štete djeluje učinkovito i preventivno prije nego prijetnja štete prouzroči štetu.
Following disclosure, the GOC was of the opinion that any benefits that the definitive measures against HRF imports would have for the Union industry would be outweighed by the negative effects on users.
Osim toga, tvrdio je da se, s obzirom na to da se pravilo o nižoj pristojbi primjenjuje se na uvođenje kompenzacijskih pristojbi, što znači da bi se pristojba trebala utvrditi s pomoću subvencije i marže štete, trebalo bi biti jasno da bi se subvencija i marža štete trebale odnositi na isto razdoblje.
Moreover, it alleged that the imposition of measures would be particularly disproportionate for unrelated importers, who are in direct competition with, and already in a disadvantageous position vis-à-vis related users, who are able to set prices and who benefit from favourable commercial conditions granted by integrated producers.
Komisija je odbacila te tvrdnje zbog sljedećih razloga.
The Commission rejected this claim on the basis of the explanations in recital (607) above, since alternative sources of supply will continue to exist.
Prvo, kako je prethodno utvrđeno u uvodnoj izjavi (627), marža prijetnje štete treba odražavati prijetnju, a kad se prijetnja ostvari u kasnijoj fazi RIP-a, marža štete mora odražavati konkretni učinak prijetnje.
In view of the above, the Commission concluded that the imposition of measures would be against the interest of users, but would not have a clearly disproportionate negative effect on them.
Zbog svih prethodno navedenih razloga Komisija je zaključila da bi se razdoblje za izračun marže štete u ovom slučaju trebao temeljiti na drugoj polovini 2015., a ne na cijelom razdoblju ispitnog postupka.
In particular, even if Chinese exports would de facto stop, a wide range of supply would remain available on the market.
Kao rezultat toga, Komisija je od proizvođača koji surađuju zatražila dodatne podatke.
Moreover, the Commission found that the impact of the measures on the profitability of users that came forward was limited.
Primila je dodatne tromjesečne podatke iz RIP-a o troškovima proizvodnje po vrsti proizvoda od proizvođača iz Unije iz uzorka te ih je nakon toga provjerila.
Conclusion on Union interest
Provjere su se odnosile isključivo na dodatne podatke koji su dostavljeni, a koji prethodno nisu bili zatraženi, kako bi se osiguralo da su podaci na kojima Komisija temelji svoje nalaze pouzdani.
The Commission concluded that the imposition of measures would contribute to the recovery of the Union industry in terms of profitability.
U pogledu izračuna njegove specifične marže štete, proizvođač izvoznik Shougang Group tvrdio je da podaci za te dvije vrste proizvoda nisu uzeti u obzir.
The imposition of measures would allow the Union producers to make the necessary investments and R&D to better equip their HRF steel production equipment and boost their competitiveness.
Komisija je tu tvrdnju analizirala i prihvatila.
If no measures were imposed, the threat of imminent injury at the end of the investigation period is likely to materialise.
Konačne mjere
Some Union hot-rolled flat steel producers might have to close down/reduce their hot-rolled flat steel products activities, dismiss employees and leave many Union users with limited sources of supply.
Antisubvencijski ispitni postupak proveden je usporedno s revizijom antidampinških mjera i bio je ograničen na prijetnju štete.
As regards the interest of unrelated importers and users, the Commission concluded that the imposition of measures at the proposed level would have only a limited impact.
S obzirom na primjenu pravila niže pristojbe i činjenicu da su konačne subvencijske marže niže od razine uklanjanja štete, Komisija bi trebala uvesti konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na razini utvrđenih konačnih subvencijskih marži, a potom uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu do relevantne razine uklanjanja štete.
More specifically, the prices, their profitability and the employment in the user's industry would not be disproportionately affected.
Međutim, s obzirom na to da je konačna antidampinška uredba već donesena 6. travnja 2017., bilo je potrebno izmijeniti tu uredbu.
Hence, the imposition of definitive countervailing measures at the proposed level only has a limited impact on the prices of the supply chain and the performance of users.
Na temelju te metodologije i činjenica iz ovog predmeta, a posebno činjenice da u trenutačnom ispitnom postupku nisu uvedene kompenzacijske mjere za izvozne subvencije, mjere su ograničene maržom štete, Komisija smatra da u ovom predmetu neće nastati pitanja u pogledu „dvostrukog brojanja”.
Weighing and balancing the strong interests of an important Union industry to be protected against unfair practices, on the one hand, and the limited likely effects of measures on unrelated importers and users, which continue to benefit from a wide array of supply in the Union, the Commission concluded that there were no compelling reasons that it was not in the Union interest to impose measures on subsidised imports of the product concerned originating in the country concerned.
S obzirom na visoku stopu suradnje kineskih proizvođača izvoznika, pristojba „svih ostalih trgovačkih društava” bila je utvrđena na razini najviše pristojbe koja će se uvesti trgovačkim društvima uključenima u uzorak ili onima koja surađuju u ispitnom postupku.
DEFINITIVE ANTI-SUBSIDY MEASURES
Pristojbe za „sva ostala poduzeća” primjenjivat će se na ona poduzeća koja nisu surađivala u ovom ispitnom postupku.
On the basis of the conclusions reached by the Commission on subsidy, threat of injury, causation and Union interest, definitive anti-subsidy measures should be imposed to prevent that the imminent threat of material injury which is caused to the Union industry by the subsidised imports would materialise.
Za ostale kineske proizvođače izvoznike iz Priloga koji surađuju, a nisu u uzorku, konačna stopa pristojbe određena je na razini ponderiranih prosječnih stopa utvrđenih za proizvođače izvoznike u uzorku koji surađuju.
Injury elimination level (Injury margin)
Na temelju prethodno navedenog, stope pristojbi koje će se uvesti određene su kako slijedi:
To determine the level of the measures, the Commission first established the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the threat of injury suffered by the Union industry.
Tablica 24.
The threat of injury would be eliminated if the Union industry was able to cover its costs of production and to obtain a profit before tax on sales of the like product (the so-called target profit) in the Union market that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition by an industry of this type in the sector, namely in the absence of dumped imports.
Konačna kompenzacijska pristojba
As regards the determination of a target profit, the Commission first analysed the proposal of the complainant in the anti-dumping investigation against China on the same product concerned, which pointed to 12,9 %, taken from a previous Commission decision on the same product [101].
Kineski proizvođači izvoznici
However, this finding dates back to the year 2000, and the data from over 15 years ago cannot be regarded as representative anymore given the technological and financial changes the Union industry faced since then and given the changes in size of the Union market since 2000 as a result of the growing number of Member States during the period 2000-2016.
Dampinška marža (utvrđena u antidampinškom ispitnom postupku)
The Government of China proposed that only a profit margin of at most 5 % can be considered reasonable [102].
Razina uklanjanja štete
In this regard, it referred to Commission past practice, whereby 4,8 % and 3 % target profit was found to be appropriate in respectively the Rebars case [103] and the Seamless Pipes and Tubes case [104].
Stopa kompenzacijske pristojbe
However, these products are downstream steel products, which are not similar to the product concerned.
Antidampinška pristojba
The Commission then turned to the profitability data of the year 2008, which it had regarded as the most representative year for a downstream product, namely cold-rolled steel products.
Društvo nije uključeno u uzorak u antidampinškom ispitnom postupku
The product concerned of the current investigation is similar in many aspects to certain cold-rolled flat steel products (cold-rolled products) for the following reasons:
Ostala društva koja surađuju i u antidampinškom i u antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku
For both products (iron ore and coking coal) certain alloys are major parts of their cost of production and they go through similar processes (furnace, hot strip mill).
Ostala društva koja surađuju u antidampinškom ispitnom postupku, ali ne i u antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku
As set out in recital (40) above, the product concerned is the primary material for the production of various value-added downstream steel products, starting with cold-rolled products.
Stopa pojedinačne antidampinške i antisubvencijske pristojbe za svako društvo koja je određena u ovoj Uredbi utvrđena je na temelju nalaza trenutačnih ispitnih postupaka.
On this basis, the Commission found a profit margin of 14,4 %.
Ona stoga odražava stanje utvrđeno tijekom tih ispitnih postupaka u odnosu na predmetno društvo.
However, various elements in that case relating to injurious dumping from China and Russia are not present in the current case, where the Commission found a threat of injury from Chinese subsidised exports, which involves a prospective analysis.
Ta se stopa pristojbe (za razliku od pristojbe na državnom području cijele zemlje koja se primjenjuje na „sva ostala društva”) primjenjuje isključivo na uvoz proizvodā podrijetlom iz predmetne zemlje i koje proizvodi navedeno društvo.
In particular, in that case, imports at low prices from the countries under investigation had taken place throughout the four-year period prior to the investigation period.
Uvezeni proizvodi koje proizvodi neko drugo društvo koje se posebno ne spominje u izvršnom dijelu ove Uredbe, uključujući subjekte povezane s onima koji se posebno spominju, ne mogu imati koristi od tih stopa i podložni su stopi pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na „sva ostala društva”.
The Commission then tried to establish a target profit by simulating how the recovery of the Union industry from the recession caused by the economic and financial crisis in 2009 might have developed if it had not been interrupted by the high volumes of price-depressing Chinese imports.
Komisija je primila na znanje promjene naziva.
For this exercise, it relied on more recent data and a prospective analysis presented to the OECD's Steel Committee in December 2013.
Društvo može zatražiti primjenu pojedinačne stope pristojbe ako naknadno promijeni naziv subjekta.
In a study entitled ‘Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry’ an expert opinion looked at the profitability of the global steel industry in recent years and fixed a long-term sustainability profit threshold.
Zahtjev se mora uputiti Komisiji.
In particular, this study argued in favour of 17 % global average EBITDA margin (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) [106].
Zahtjev mora sadržavati sve relevantne informacije kojima je moguće dokazati da ta promjena ne utječe na pravo društva na ostvarivanje koristi od stope pristojbe koja se na njega primjenjuje.
The report also points to an average of 7 % investment costs and an average debt cost of 3 %.
Ako promjena naziva tog društva ne utječe na njegovo pravo na ostvarivanje koristi od stope pristojbe koja se na njega primjenjuje, obavijest o promjeni naziva objavit će se u Službenom listu Europske unije.
The Commission deducted these two cost categories, and arrived at level of 7 % for earnings before taxes (EBT).
Kako bi se osigurala propisna provedba kompenzacijske pristojbe, razinu pristojbe za sva ostala društva potrebno je primjenjivati ne samo na proizvođače izvoznike koji ne surađuju, nego i na one proizvođače koji tijekom RIP-a nisu izvozili u Uniju.
Absent any other reliable data, it equated these figures made for the steel industry as a whole to the product concerned, as HRF makes up a big proportion of the crude steel production.
OBJAVA
In conclusion, the Commission established that a target profit of 7 % can be used to calculate the threat of injury margin for the Union HRF industry.
Zainteresirane stranke obaviještene su o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih se namjeravalo preporučiti uvođenje konačne kompenzacijske pristojbe na uvoz premazanog finog papira podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine.
The period to be used for the injury margin calculation in a threat of injury case
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog člankom 15. stavkom 1.
First, the Commission recalls that the determination of subsidy and injury is made on the basis of an investigation period and a period considered defined in line with the relevant provisions of the basic Regulation and announced in the Notice of Initiation.
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [107].
On the other hand, the basic Regulation does not provide any specific method for the calculation of the injury margin used for the application of the lesser-duty rule.
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
Second, the basic Regulation also does not provide specific criteria for the definition of the period during which the parameters for the calculation of the injury margin are assessed.
Članak 1.
In the present case, the Commission needed to consider that the period chosen reflects the specificity of the case and is appropriate in the context of a prospective analysis.
Uvodi se konačna kompenzacijska pristojba na uvoz određenih plosnatih valjanih proizvoda od željeza, nelegiranog čelika ili drugog legiranog čelika, bilo da su u kolutima ili ne (uključujući proizvode koji su odrezani na određenu dužinu i „uske trake”), samo toplovaljanih i dalje neobrađenih, koji nisu platirani niti prevučeni, podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine.
In this respect, the Commission was of the opinion that it could not apply a standard material injury approach by taking the average injury margin over the whole IP (i.e. 2015): the threat of injury margin needs to reflect the threat, and when the threat materialises later on during the IP, the injury margin must reflect the concrete impact of the threat.
Predmetni je proizvod trenutačno obuhvaćen oznakama KN 72081000, 72082500, 72082600, 72082700, 72083600, 72083700, 72083800, 72083900, 72084000, 72085210, 72085299, 72085310, 72085390, 72085400, 72111300, 72111400, 72111900, ex72251910 (oznaka TARIC 7225191090), 72253090, ex72254060 (oznaka TARIC 7225406090), 72254090, ex72261910 (oznaka TARIC 7226191090), 72269191 i 72269199.
In order to effectively remove the impact of the threat of injury the Commission therefore looked at those parts of the IP where the threat of injury started to materialise as follows: It referred inter alia to recital (549) stating that ‘while the Union industry was recovering during 2014 and the first two quarters of 2015, almost all injury indicators started to fall dramatically during the second half of 2015.
Stopa konačne kompenzacijske pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na neto cijenu franko granica Unije, neocarinjeno, za proizvod opisan u stavku 1. koji proizvode društva u nastavku, jest sljedeća:
The investigation revealed that this negative trend, which started in the second half of 2015, was not invalidated during the first half of 2016.’
Društvo
It further provided in recital (554) that ‘In view of the coincidence in time between, on the one hand, the ever-increasing level of subsidised imports at continuously decreasing prices and, on the other hand, the Union industry's loss of market share and price depression resulting in further losses, in particular from the second half of 2015 onwards, the Commission concluded that the subsidised imports had a negative impact on the situation of the Union industry.’
Konačna kompenzacijska pristojba
Second, as to the substance of the matter, the Commission established that, as laid out in recital (462), the negative trend started in the second half of 2015 and led to a clearly foreseeable and imminent change in circumstances at the end of the investigation period, which would create a situation in which the subsidisation would cause injury, if no measures were taken.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
This is in line with what was stated by the Commission in recital (457) that ‘the Union producers could partly recover during 2014 and the first half of 2015’.
Narodna Republika Kina
As a result, the second half of 2015 better reflects the actual impact of the threat of injury to the Union industry that should be removed.
Ostala društva koja surađuju navedena u Prilogu
Third, the Court held that the analysis of the post-investigation period data is particularly appropriate in an investigation to determine whether there is a threat of injury which, by its very nature, requires a prospective analysis.
Vidjeti Prilog
For the Commission, the second half of 2015 seems to better respond to this requirement, as it is closer to future developments than the full IP.
Uvjet za primjenu pojedinačnih stopa kompenzacijskih pristojbi utvrđenih za društva navedena u stavku 2. podnošenje je carinskim tijelima država članica valjanog trgovačkog računa na kojem se nalazi datirana izjava koju je potpisao službenik subjekta koji izdaje račun, uz navođenje njegova imena i funkcije, koja glasi: „Ja, dolje potpisani, potvrđujem da je (obujam) toplovaljanih plosnatih proizvoda od čelika s ovog računa koji se prodaje za izvoz u Europsku uniju proizvelo društvo (naziv društva i adresa) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) u (predmetna zemlja).
Fourth, a calculation on the basis of a full investigation period, irrespective whether there were signs of negative trends, would undermine the objective of a threat of injury case to act effectively and preventively before the threat of injury has caused injury.
Izjavljujem da su podaci na ovom računu potpuni i točni.”.
After disclosure, the exporting producer Shougang Group disagreed with the Commission's approach of only taking data with respect to the second half of 2015 for the determination of the injury margin.
Ako se takav račun ne predoči, primjenjuje se stopa pristojbi koja se primjenjuje na „sva ostala društva”.
It argued that an investigation period is set at the beginning of an investigation in order to avoid any subjective determinations by investigating authorities.
Osim ako je drukčije određeno, primjenjuju se važeće odredbe o carinskim pristojbama.
The Commission rejected these claims for the following reasons: First, as stated in recital (627) above, the threat of injury margin needs to reflect the threat, and when the threat materialises later on during the IP, the injury margin must reflect the concrete impact of the threat.
1.
Second, under Articles 11 and 5 of the basic Regulation, which equally apply to investigations initiated on the basis of allegations of threat of injury, representative findings have to be based on a period ending before the initiation of proceedings (see recital (475)).
Članak 1. stavak 2.
Finally, as set out in recital (626), the basic Regulation does not provide any specific method for the calculation of the injury margin used for the application of the lesser-duty rule.
Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 2017/649 zamjenjuje se sljedećim.
For all the reasons above, the Commission concluded that the period for calculating the injury margins in this particular case should be based on the second half of 2015 and not on the entire investigation period.
Stopa konačne antidampinške pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na neto cijenu franko granica Unije, neocarinjeno, za proizvod opisan u stavku 1. koji proizvode društva u nastavku jest sljedeća:
As a result, the Commission requested additional data to co-operating producers.
Konačna antidampinška pristojba
It received additional quarterly IP data on the cost of production per product type from the sampled Union producers and verified these data afterwards.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
The verifications concerned solely the additional data provided which were not requested before and ensured that the data on which the Commission eventually based its findings were reliable.
2.
With respect to the calculation of its specific injury margin, the exporting producer Shougang Group submitted that the data for two product types were not taken into consideration.
Članak 1. stavak 5.
After the analysis of this claim, the Commission accepted it.
Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 2017/649 zamjenjuje se sljedećim.
Therefore, the injury margin for the Shougang Group decreased from 31,9 % to 31,5 %.
Ako neki novi proizvođač izvoznik iz Narodne Republike Kine Komisiji dostavi sljedeće dostatne dokaze:
Definitive measures
da od 1. siječnja 2015. do 31. prosinca 2015. (razdoblje ispitnog postupka) nije izvozio u Uniju proizvod opisan u stavku 1.,
The anti-subsidy investigation was carried out in parallel with an investigation concerning the anti-dumping measures, limited to the threat of injury.
da nije povezan niti s jednim izvoznikom ili proizvođačem u Narodnoj Republici Kini na kojeg se primjenjuju antidampinške mjere uvedene ovom Uredbom,
In view of the use of the lesser duty rule, and the fact that the definitive amounts of countervailable subsidies expressed on ad valorem basis are lower than the injury elimination level, the Commission should impose the definitive countervailing duty at the level of the established definitive amounts of countervailable subsidies and then impose the definitive anti-dumping duty up to the relevant injury elimination level.
da je stvarno u Uniju izvozio predmetni proizvod nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka na kojem se temelje mjere ili je preuzeo neopozivu ugovornu obvezu za izvoz znatne količine u Uniju,
However, as the definitive anti-dumping regulation was already adopted on 6 April 2017, it was necessary to amend that regulation to take account of the findings present herein.
članak 1. stavak 2. može se izmijeniti dodavanjem novog proizvođača izvoznika na popis društava navedenih u tablici i na koje se primjenjuje pojedinačna pristojba ne veća od stope pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na društva koja su surađivala u antidampinškom ispitnom postupku, ali ne i u antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku, tj.