natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ZEMOUR 2 [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], SHAANXI HENAN 33 [according to GFCM], YONGDING [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (previous names according to CCAMLR: LUAMPA, YONGDING, CHENGDU, JIANGFENG, SHAANXI HENAN 33, XIONG NU BARU 33, DRACO I, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, SEO YANG No. 88, CARRAN; previous names according to GFCM: XIONG NU BARU 33, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, CARRAN, DRACO-1; previous name according to ICCAT, IOTC: JIANGFENG; previous name according to SEAFO: YONDING)
SAMUDERA PASIFIK br.
Mauritania [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzania [according to GFCM], Unknown [according to ICCAT], Equatorial Guinea [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Equatorial Guinea, Indonesia, Tanzania, Panama, Sierra Leone, North Korea (DPRK), Togo, Republic of Korea, Uruguay)
18 (prijašnja imena prema ICCAT-u: KAWIL br.
International Maritime Organization.
03, LADY VI-T-III)
For any additional information consult the websites of the regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs).
Indonezija
The vessel ‘Viking’ [10], which is currently included in the Union list, has been removed from the list established by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (‘CCAMLR’), since it had been sunk by the Indonesian authorities on 14 March 2016.
SAMUDRA PERKASA 12 [prema IOTC-u], SAMUDERA PERKASA 12 [prema ICCAT-u]
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz keramičkih pločica podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1], and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije [1], a posebno njezin članak 11. stavak 2.,
Measures in force
A. POSTUPAK
Following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed, by means of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘China’ or ‘country concerned’).
Mjere na snazi
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty and the duty levels imposed ranged from 13,9 % [3] to 36,5 % for cooperating producers.
Nakon antidampinškog ispitnog postupka („početni ispitni postupak”) Vijeće je Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 917/2011 [2] uvelo konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz keramičkih pločica podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK” ili „Kina” ili „predmetna zemlja”).
Furthermore, a country-wide duty rate of 69,7 % was imposed on Chinese companies which either did not make themselves known or did not cooperate with the investigation.
Mjere su bile u obliku pristojbe ad valorem, a uvedene razine pristojbe kretale su se u rasponu od 13,9 % [3] do 36,5 % za proizvođače koji surađuju.
Request for an expiry review
Nadalje, uvedena je stopa pristojbe od 69,7 % na razini zemlje za kineska društva koja se nisu javila ili nisu surađivala u ispitnom postupku.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [4] of the anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of the measures in force pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (‘the basic Regulation’) (‘the request’).
Zahtjev za reviziju zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera
The request was lodged by the European Ceramic Tile Manufacturers' Federation (‘the applicant’ or ‘CET’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of ceramic tiles.
Nakon objave obavijesti o predstojećem isteku [4] antidampinških mjera na snazi Komisija je zaprimila zahtjev za pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and continuation or recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 („osnovna uredba”) („zahtjev”).
Initiation of an expiry review
Zahtjev je podnio Europski savez proizvođača keramičkih pločica („podnositelj zahtjeva” ili „CET”) u ime proizvođača koji čine više od 25 % ukupne proizvodnje keramičkih pločica u Uniji.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 13 September 2016, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zahtjev se temeljio na činjenici da bi istekom mjera vjerojatno došlo do nastavka ili ponavljanja dampinga i nastavka ili ponavljanja štete za industriju Unije.
Review investigation period and period considered
Pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Nakon što je utvrdila da postoje dostatni dokazi za pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera, Komisija je 13. rujna 2016. objavljivanjem obavijesti u Službenom listu Europske unije [5] („Obavijest o pokretanju postupka”) najavila pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe.
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije i razmatrano razdoblje
Parties concerned by the investigation
Ispitnim postupkom o vjerojatnosti nastavka ili ponavljanja dampinga i štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. srpnja 2015. do 30. lipnja 2016. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije” ili „RIPR”).
The Commission advised the applicants, other known Union producers, exporting producers in the PRC, known importers, users and traders known to be concerned, associations representing Union producers and users and representatives of the exporting countries of the initiation of the expiry review.
Ispitivanjem kretanja važnih za procjenu vjerojatnosti ponavljanja štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2013. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije („razmatrano razdoblje”).
Interested parties were given opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Stranke na koje se odnosi ispitni postupak
The Union producers, represented by the applicant, took this opportunity to request that their names are kept confidential for fear that they could face retaliation by customers or competitors implicated by this investigation, in line with Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je o pokretanju revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera obavijestila podnositelje zahtjeva, ostale poznate proizvođače iz Unije, proizvođače izvoznike iz NRK-a, poznate uvoznike, korisnike i trgovce za koje se zna da se na njih odnosi ispitni postupak, udruženja koja predstavljaju proizvođače iz Unije i predstavnike zemalja izvoznica.
The Commission individually examined each of these confidentiality requests for merit thereof.
Zainteresiranim stranama pružena je prilika da iznesu svoja stajališta u pisanom obliku i zatraže saslušanje u roku utvrđenom u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
It established that there was indeed evidence of a significant possibility of retaliation in each case and accepted that the names of these companies should not be disclosed.
Proizvođači iz Unije, koje predstavlja podnositelj zahtjeva, iskoristili su tu priliku kako bi u skladu s člankom 19. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe zatražili da njihovi nazivi budu povjerljivi zbog straha od moguće odmazde kupaca ili konkurenata na koje utječe ovaj ispitni postupak.
The Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (the ‘CCCMC’) requested a hearing.
Komisija je pojedinačno ispitala osnovanost svakog od tih zahtjeva za povjerljivošću.
The hearing took place on 6 December 2016.
Utvrdila je da zaista postoje dokazi o znatnoj mogućnosti odmazde u svakom slučaju i prihvatila da se nazivi tih društava ne otkriju.
At the hearing and in the subsequent submissions the CCCMC requested full access to the dumping margin, price effects, injury margin and injury indicators calculations, and any other confidential information on which calculations were based.
Kineska trgovačka komora uvoznika i izvoznika metala, minerala i kemikalija („CCCMC”) zatražila je saslušanje.
The CCCMC argued that the lawyers that would be granted the access are registered at a European bar association and are subject to strict bar rules and disclosing confidential information to their clients would result in severe disciplinary actions, including disbarment and potential criminal action.
Ono se održalo 6. prosinca 2016.
Therefore, the CCCMC argued that the access to the confidential file would not breach the Commission's obligation to protect confidential information whilst allowing an effective exercise of the rights of defence.
CCCMC je na saslušanju i u naknadnim podnescima zatražio potpuni pristup izračunima dampinške marže, utjecajâ na cijenu, marže štete i pokazatelja štete te svim ostalim povjerljivim informacijama na kojima su se temeljili izračuni.
Article 19 of the basic Regulation stipulates that the Commission must not reveal any information which is by nature confidential without specific permission from the supplier of such information.
CCCMC je tvrdio da su odvjetnici kojima bi bio odobren pristup upisani u neku od europskih odvjetničkih komora i podliježu njezinim strogim pravilima te bi otkrivanje povjerljivih informacija klijentima dovelo do oštrih disciplinskih mjera, uključujući njihovo isključivanje iz odvjetničke komore i moguće pokretanje kaznenog postupka.
It does not envisage that any other party, including lawyers registered at a European bar association, is granted the access.
Stoga je CCCMC tvrdio da odobravanjem pristupa povjerljivom spisu Komisija ne bi povrijedila svoju obvezu zaštite povjerljivih informacija, a istodobno bi omogućila učinkovito ostvarivanje pravâ na obranu.
Furthermore, the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice reveals that the protection of rights of the defence must be, where necessary, reconciled with the principle of confidentiality, which is specifically laid down in Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Člankom 19. osnovne uredbe propisano je da Komisija ne smije otkriti povjerljive podatke bez posebnog odobrenja pružatelja tih podataka.
While that reconciliation permits the receipt of non-confidential summaries of such information (carried out, for instance, in the form of ranges and/or indexed elements of information) where that information would not lead to a disclosure of business secrets, it is not absolute.
Njime nije predviđeno odobravanje pristupa nijednoj drugoj stranci, uključujući odvjetnike upisane u europsku odvjetničku komoru.
Accordingly, and while the CCCMC could have been granted access to, for instance, ranges and/or indexed elements of the information requested, full disclosure of that information was not deemed reconcilable with the duty to protect confidential information.
Nadalje, iz sudske prakse Suda proizlazi da zaštita pravâ na obranu mora prema potrebi biti usklađena s načelom povjerljivosti, koje je posebno utvrđeno u članku 19. osnovne uredbe [6].
In like measure, and because the Union legislator did not foresee this exception in the basic Regulation, the Commission considered that the fact that the lawyers registered at a European bar association are subject to strict bar rules and are potentially subject to sanctions in case of breach of these rules does not allow the Commission services to grant access contrary to the applicable legislation.
Iako je na temelju tog usklađivanja dopušteno zaprimanje sažetaka informacija koji nisu povjerljivi (na primjer u obliku rasponâ i/ili indeksiranih dijelova podataka) ako takve informacije ne bi dovele do otkrivanja poslovnih tajni, ono nije apsolutno.
The Commission thus concluded that the access to confidential information by lawyers registered at a European bar association could not be granted.
Shodno tomu, iako se CCCMC-u mogao odobriti pristup, na primjer, rasponima i/ili indeksiranim dijelovima zatraženih informacija, nije se smatralo da je potpuno otkrivanje tih informacija usklađeno s dužnošću zaštite povjerljivih informacija.
In any case, an additional element for safeguarding, in this respect, the rights of defence of interested parties, is the possibility of having recourse to the Hearing Officer in Trade Proceedings under Article 15 of his terms of reference [7] who did not call into question the Commission's position on confidentiality.
U istoj je mjeri, i budući da zakonodavac Unije nije predvidio takvo izuzeće u osnovnoj uredbi, Komisija smatrala da činjenicom da odvjetnici koji su upisani u europsku odvjetničku komoru podliježu njezinim strogim pravilima i mogućim sankcijama u slučaju povrede tih pravila službama Komisije nije dopušteno odobriti pristup u suprotnosti s primjenjivim zakonodavstvom.
Hence, the Commission deemed the information provided in the disclosure documents sufficient to satisfy the former's rights of defence.
Stoga je Komisija zaključila da se odvjetnicima koji su upisani u europsku odvjetničku komoru ne može odobriti pristup povjerljivim informacijama.
Sampling
U svakom slučaju, dodatni element zaštite pravâ na obranu zainteresiranih strana u tom pogledu jest mogućnost obraćanja službeniku za saslušanja u trgovinskim postupcima u skladu s člankom 15. njegova opisa poslova [7], koji nije doveo u pitanje stajalište Komisije o povjerljivosti.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da su informacije navedene u dokumentima o objavi dovoljne za ispunjavanje njegovih pravâ na obranu.
Sampling of exporting producers in the PRC
Odabir uzorka
On the basis of information provided by the applicant, the Commission found that the PRC ceramic industry was largely fragmented with 1452 producers in 2014.
U Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka Komisija je navela da bi mogla provesti odabir uzorka zainteresiranih strana u skladu s člankom 17. osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, in view of the apparently large number of exporting producers in the PRC, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of Initiation.
Odabir uzorka proizvođača izvoznika iz NRK-a
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Na temelju informacija koje je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva Komisija je utvrdila da je keramička industrija NRK-a 2014. bila u velikoj mjeri rascjepkana i obuhvaćala je 1452 proizvođača.
In addition, it asked the mission of the PRC to the Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Stoga je, s obzirom na očito velik broj proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u, u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka predviđen odabir uzorka.
In total, the information specified in the Notice of Initiation was sent to 119 companies in the PRC.
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od svih proizvođača izvoznika iz NRK-a koji su joj poznati zatražila da dostave informacije navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
Nineteen producers or group of producers in the PRC provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Osim toga, zatražila je od misije NRK-a pri Uniji da utvrdi ostale proizvođače izvoznike koji bi mogli biti zainteresirani za sudjelovanje u ispitnom postupku, ako postoje, i/ili da s njima stupi u kontakt.
Given the number of companies which could have come forward, this was considered low cooperation.
Informacije navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka poslane su na ukupno 119 društava iz NRK-a.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission provisionally selected a sample of four groups of exporting producers on the basis of their declared volume of exports to the Union during the review investigation period and their production capacity which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Devetnaest proizvođača ili skupina proizvođača iz NRK-a dostavilo je zatražene informacije i pristalo da ih se uključi u uzorak.
Following the disclosure to interested parties of this provisional sample, the group of exporting producers with the largest production capacity withdrew its cooperation.
S obzirom na broj društava koja su mogla dostaviti informacije, razina suradnje smatrala se niskom.
Thus, the proposed sample was amended by adding the exporting producer with the second largest production capacity.
Komisija je u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe odabrala privremeni uzorak od četiriju skupina proizvođača izvoznika na temelju njihova prijavljenog obujma izvoza u Uniju tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije i njihova proizvodnog kapaciteta koji su se razumno mogli ispitati u raspoloživom razdoblju.
Following the disclosure of the amended sample to the interested parties, no comments were received.
Nakon objave privremenog uzorka zainteresiranim stranama skupina proizvođača izvoznika s najvećim proizvodnim kapacitetom povukla je svoju suradnju.
Therefore, the sampling proposal was confirmed in accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation.
Stoga je predloženi uzorak izmijenjen dodavanjem proizvođača izvoznika s drugim najvećim proizvodnim kapacitetom.
The four sampled groups of exporting producers had an annual production of 55 million m2 of the product concerned, representing around 34 % of the overall declared production and sales of all cooperating exporting producers or groups of exporting producers of the product concerned to the Union.
Nakon objave izmijenjenog uzorka zainteresiranim stranama nisu zaprimljene nikakve primjedbe.
The four sampled groups covered around 8 % of the total Chinese exports to the Union according to Eurostat in the review investigation period.
Stoga je prijedlog za odabir uzorka potvrđen u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe.
Sampling of Union producers
Četiri skupine proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku proizvodile su 55 milijuna m2 predmetnog proizvoda godišnje, što je činilo oko 34 % ukupne prijavljene proizvodnje i prodaje svih proizvođača izvoznika ili skupina proizvođača izvoznika predmetnog proizvoda koji surađuju u Uniji.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
U skladu s podacima Eurostata tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije četiri skupine u uzorku činile su oko 8 % ukupnog kineskog izvoza u Uniju.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales and production, taking into account geographical spread and also the high fragmentation of the ceramic tiles industry in line with the methodology detailed below in recitals (20) to (21).
Odabir uzorka proizvođača iz Unije
In the original investigation the Commission concluded that the ceramic tiles sector is very fragmented.
Komisija je u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka navela da je odabrala privremeni uzorak proizvođača iz Unije.
Therefore, in order to ensure that the results of large companies did not dominate the injury analysis and to ensure that the situation of the small and medium-sized companies, collectively accounting for the largest share of the Union production, was adequately reflected, the Commission decided to establish three segments based on the volume of yearly production:
U skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala uzorak na temelju najvećeg reprezentativnog obujma prodaje i proizvodnje, uzimajući u obzir zemljopisnu rasprostranjenost i veliku rascjepkanost industrije keramičkih pločica u skladu s metodologijom koja je detaljno opisana u nastavku u uvodnim izjavama od 20. do 21.
Segment 1: large companies — production in excess of 10 million m2,
U početnom ispitnom postupku Komisija je zaključila da je sektor keramičkih pločica vrlo rascjepkan.
Segment 2: medium-sized companies — production between 5 and 10 million m2,
Kako bi osigurala da rezultati velikih društava ne prevladavaju u analizi štete i da se na odgovarajući način odražava stanje malih i srednjih društava, koja zajedno čine najveći udio proizvodnje u Uniji, Komisija je odlučila utvrditi tri segmenta na temelju obujma godišnje proizvodnje:
Segment 3: small companies — production below 5 million m2.
prvi segment: velika društva s proizvodnjom većom od 10 milijuna m2,
The Commission's investigation did not reveal any changes to the ceramic tiles market, which continues to be fragmented, and thus dominated by small Union producers as opposed to larger producers able to influence the market's direction.
drugi segment: srednja društva s proizvodnjom između 5 i 10 milijuna m2,
Accordingly, the Commission considered that the high fragmentation of the ceramic tiles sector should also be taken into consideration in the current expiry review.
treći segment: mala društva s proizvodnjom manjom od 5 milijuna m2.
It, therefore, decided to apply the same methodology for the selection of the sample as in the original investigation and considered that all segments, namely small, medium-sized and large companies should be represented in the sample.
U ispitnom postupku Komisije nisu otkrivene nikakve promjene na tržištu keramičkih pločica, koje je i dalje rascjepkano i na kojem prevladavaju mali proizvođači iz Unije za razliku od velikih proizvođača koji mogu utjecati na smjer tržišta.
The provisional sample consisted of nine Union producers.
Shodno tomu, Komisija je smatrala da bi u trenutačnoj reviziji zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera trebalo uzeti u obzir i veliku rascjepkanost sektora keramičkih pločica.
Companies from all of the three sectors were represented: Two companies were from the segment of large companies, three companies were from the segment of medium-sized companies and four companies were from the segment of small companies.
Privremeni se uzorak sastojao od devet proizvođača iz Unije.
The sample thus covered Member States where approximately 90 % of the production is situated.
Stoga su uzorkom bile obuhvaćene države članice u kojima je smješteno otprilike 90 % proizvodnje.
Thus the methodology applied by the Commission ensured that the sample was representative of the Union production as a whole and complied with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Tako je metodologijom koju je primijenila Komisija osigurano da je uzorak reprezentativan za proizvodnju u Uniji u cjelini i usklađen s člankom 17. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe.
The new sample accounted for 7,7 % of the total Union production.
Novi uzorak činio je 7,7 % ukupne proizvodnje u Uniji.
The new sample covered Member States where approximately 80 % of the production is situated.
Njime su bile obuhvaćene države članice u kojima je smješteno otprilike 80 % proizvodnje.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the sample of the unrelated importers on the basis of the size of the imports taking into accounts the geographical spread.
U skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala uzorak nepovezanih uvoznika na temelju obujma uvoza uzimajući u obzir zemljopisnu rasprostranjenost.