natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Question (c) Do these alternatives present a significantly lower overall risk for human health, animal health and the environment?
Ultrazvuk
According to agreed Union guidance, this question should only be addressed if the considered alternatives are sufficiently effective and do not present other significant economic or practical disadvantages (see sections addressing Questions (d) and (e)).
Glodavci se odbijaju ultrazvukom jačine 70 – 140 dB.
Based on the conclusions reached for questions (a), (b), (d) and (e), the opinion considered that addressing Question (c) was not necessary.
Pitanje (c): Predstavljaju li te alternative znatno manji opći rizik za zdravlje ljudi, zdravlje životinja i okoliš?
Question (d): Are these alternatives sufficiently effective?
Prema dogovorenim smjernicama Unije to bi se pitanje trebalo razmatrati samo ako su razmotrene alternative dovoljno učinkovite i ne uzrokuju druge znatne ekonomske ili praktične poteškoće (vidjeti odjeljke o razmatranju pitanja (d) i (e)).
The authorised biocidal products identified under Question (b) include active substances that have been approved and therefore considered effective for the specified uses.
Na temelju zaključaka donesenih za pitanja (a), (b), (d) i (e) u mišljenju je utvrđeno da razmatranje pitanja (c) nije potrebno.
Since being sufficiently effective is a criterion for granting an authorisation in Article 19(1)(b)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, those products are considered as being sufficiently effective.
Pitanje (d): Jesu li te alternative dovoljno učinkovite?
Regarding the non-chemical alternatives identified under Question (b), according to the opinion each of the alternatives, on their own or in combination with other alternatives may provide sufficient efficacy in certain, perhaps limited, circumstances.
Među odobrenim su biocidnim proizvodima navedenima u okviru pitanja (b) aktivne tvari koje su odobrene te se stoga smatraju učinkovitima za navedene uporabe.
However, there is insufficient scientific evidence to prove that any of the non-chemical alternatives reviewed are sufficiently effective according to agreed Union guidance (i.e. providing similar levels of protection or control of rodent populations under field conditions) to negate the need for anticoagulant rodenticides for the specified uses.
Budući da je dostatna učinkovitost kriterij za izdavanje odobrenja iz članka 19. stavka 1. točke (b) podtočke i.
As the condition of being sufficiently effective in Article 23(3)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 is not met, no further investigation was made for the identified non-chemical alternatives.
Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012, ti se proizvodi smatraju dovoljno učinkovitima.
Question (e): Do these alternatives present no other significant economic or practical disadvantages?
Kad su u pitanju nekemijske alternative navedene u okviru pitanja (b), u mišljenju stoji da svaka od tih alternativa u određenim, možda ograničenim, okolnostima, sama ili u kombinaciji s drugim alternativama, može biti dovoljno učinkovita.
According to agreed Union guidance, the assessment of the practical and economical disadvantages is to be done with those alternatives meeting the eligibility criteria.
Međutim, nema dovoljno znanstvenih dokaza o tome da je u skladu s dogovorenim smjernicama Unije ijedna preispitana nekemijska alternativa dovoljno učinkovita (tj. da pruža sličnu razinu nadzora ili zaštite od populacija glodavaca u terenskim uvjetima) da bi se zanijekala potreba za antikoagulantnim rodenticidima za navedene uporabe.
Therefore, only the authorised biocidal products identified in table 2 were assessed for the purpose of this question.
Budući da uvjet dostatne učinkovitosti iz članka 23. stavka 3. točke (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 nije ispunjen, u pogledu utvrđenih nekemijskih alternativa nisu provedena nikakva daljnja ispitivanja.
According to the opinion, the use of aluminium phosphide releasing phosphine and carbon dioxide leads to significant practical or economical disadvantages compared to anticoagulant rodenticides, as the control of target organisms would be at very high efforts and/or disproportionate cost.
Pitanje (e): Uzrokuju li te alternative ikakve druge znatne ekonomske ili praktične poteškoće?
Therefore, the condition of presenting no other significant economic or practical disadvantage in Article 23(3)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 is not met for the above-mentioned authorised biocidal products.
Prema dogovorenim smjernicama Unije, ocjena praktičkih i ekonomskih poteškoća radi se ako te alternative ispunjavaju kriterije prihvatljivosti.
Concerning alpha chloralose products, their temperature-dependent efficacy would compromise the use of this alternative in locations where the temperature cannot be controlled, resulting in a practical disadvantage for use in warm environments.
Stoga su za potrebe ovog pitanja ocjenjivani samo odobreni biocidni proizvodi iz tablice 2.
Moreover, considering the lack of chemical diversity (see section addressing Question (a), replacing or restricting the use of anticoagulant rodenticides with only this substance would not be advised in order to minimize the occurrence of resistance.
Prema mišljenju, uporaba aluminijeva fosfida koji oslobađa fosfin i ugljikova dioksida uzrokuje znatne praktične ili ekonomske poteškoće u usporedbi s antikoagulantnim rodenticidima jer bi u nadzor nad ciljnim organizmima trebalo uložiti vrlo velike napore i/ili nesrazmjerno velika sredstva.
Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/778 of 18 May 2015 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA) [1], and in particular Article 6 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Odluku Vijeća (ZVSP) 2015/778 od 18. svibnja 2015. o vojnoj operaciji Europske unije na južnom središnjem Sredozemlju (operacija EUNAVFOR MED SOPHIA) [1], a posebno njezin članak 6.,
Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/778, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take decisions on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA (‘EU Force Commander’).
Na temelju članka 6. stavka 1.
On 29 March 2017, the PSC adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/681 [2], appointing Rear Admiral (LH) Andrea ROMANI as EU Force Commander.
Odluke (ZVSP) 2015/778, Vijeće je ovlastilo Politički i sigurnosni odbor (PSO) za donošenje odluka o imenovanju zapovjednika snaga EU-a za operaciju EUNAVFOR MED SOPHIA („zapovjednik snaga EU-a”).
The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Rear Admiral (LH) Javier MORENO SUSANNA to succeed Rear Admiral (LH) Andrea ROMANI as the new EU Force Commander for EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA as from 1 September 2017.
PSO je 29. ožujka 2017. donio Odluku (ZVSP) 2017/681 [2] o imenovanju kontraadmirala (LH) Andree ROMANIJA zapovjednikom snaga EU-a.
On 23 June 2017, the EU Military Committee supported that recommendation.
Zapovjednik operacije EU-a preporučio je imenovanje kontraadmirala (LH) Javiera MORENA SUSANNE na mjesto kontraadmirala (LH) Andree ROMANIJA kao novog zapovjednika snaga EU-a za operaciju EUNAVFOR MED SOPHIA od 1. rujna 2017.
Decision (CFSP) 2017/681 should therefore be repealed.
Vojni odbor EU-a podupro je 23. lipnja 2017. tu preporuku.
In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,
Odluku (ZVSP) 2017/681 trebalo bi stoga staviti izvan snage.
Rear Admiral (LH) Javier MORENO SUSANNA is hereby appointed as EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA) as from 1 September 2017.
DONIO JE OVU ODLUKU:
Decision (CFSP) 2017/681 is hereby repealed.
Kontraadmiral (LH) Javier MORENO SUSANNA imenuje se zapovjednikom snaga EU-a za vojnu operaciju Europske unije na južnom središnjem Sredozemlju (operacija EUNAVFOR MED SOPHIA) od 1. rujna 2017.
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 September 2017.
Odluka (ZVSP) 2017/681 stavlja se izvan snage.
Done at Brussels, 31 August 2017.
Članak 3.
For the Political and Security Committee
Ova Odluka stupa na snagu 1. rujna 2017.
The Chairperson
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 31. kolovoza 2017.
OJ L 122, 19.5.2015, p. 31.
Za Politički i sigurnosni odbor
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/681 of 29 March 2017 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2016/1079 (EUNAVFOR MED/1/2017) (OJ L 98, 11.4.2017, p. 18).
Predsjednik
adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2017
o donošenju stajališta Vijeća o nacrtu izmjene proračuna br. 4 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2017.
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 314., u vezi s Ugovorom o osnivanju Europske zajednice za atomsku energiju, a posebno njegovim člankom 106.a,
Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [1] and in particular Article 41 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU, Euratom) br. 966/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 25. listopada 2012. o financijskim pravilima koja se primjenjuju na opći proračun Unije i o stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ, Euratom) br. 1605/2002 [1], a posebno njezin članak 41.,
the Union's budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016 [2],on 27 June 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2017,
proračun Unije za financijsku godinu 2017. konačno je donesen 1. prosinca 2016.
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
[2],Komisija je 27. lipnja 2017. podnijela prijedlog koji sadrži nacrt izmjene proračuna br. 4 za opći proračun za financijsku godinu 2017.,
The Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 was adopted on 4 September 2017.
Jedini članak
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/
Stajalište Vijeća o nacrtu izmjene proračuna br. 4 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2017. doneseno je 4. rujna 2017.
Done at Brussels, 4 September 2017.
Cjeloviti tekst dostupan je za čitanje ili preuzimanje na internetskim stranicama Vijeća: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/.
For the Council
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 4. rujna 2017.
OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.
Predsjednik
OJ L 51, 28.2.2017, p. 1.
SL L 298, 26.10.2012., str. 1.
Council Decision (EU) 2017/1537
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2017/1537
adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2017
o donošenju stajališta Vijeća o nacrtu izmjene proračuna br. 3 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2017.
the Union's budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016 [2],on 30 May 2017, he Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 3 to the general budget for the financial year 2017,
proračun Unije za financijsku godinu 2017. konačno je donesen 1. prosinca 2016.
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
[2],Komisija je 30. svibnja 2017. podnijela prijedlog koji sadrži nacrt izmjene proračuna br. 3 za opći proračun za financijsku godinu 2017.,
The Council's position on draft amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 was adopted on 4 September 2017.
Jedini članak
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/
Stajalište Vijeća o nacrtu izmjene proračuna br. 3 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2017. doneseno je 4. rujna 2017.
Done at Brussels, 4 September 2017.
Cjeloviti tekst dostupan je za čitanje ili preuzimanje na internetskim stranicama Vijeća: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/
By letter dated 7 January 2015, France notified the Commission of an invitation to tender for the installation and operation of a combined cycle gas (‘CCG’) [2] power station in Brittany.
Dopisom od 7. siječnja 2015.
France provided additional information to the Commission by letters dated 5 June 2015 and 10 and 17 September 2015.
Francuska je Komisiji dostavila poziv na podnošenje ponuda za izgradnju i korištenje postrojenja za proizvodnju električne energije u Bretanji, i to kombinirane elektrane na plin [2].
By letter dated 13 November 2015, the Commission informed France that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) in respect of the measure (‘the opening decision’).
Dopisima od 5. lipnja 2015. te 10. i 17. rujna 2015.
The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Francuska je Komisiji dostavila dodatne informacije.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je dopisom od 13. studenoga 2015. obavijestila Francusku o odluci o pokretanju postupka predviđenog člankom 108. stavkom 2.
The Commission received comments from several interested parties.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije („UFEU”), koji se odnosi na prethodno navedenu mjeru („odluka o pokretanju postupka”).
It forwarded those observations to France, giving it the opportunity to comment on them, and received France's comments by letter dated 8 June 2016.
Odluka Komisije o pokretanju postupka objavljena je u Službenom listu Europske Unije [3].
On 5 September the Commission sent a new list of questions to the French authorities, who replied on 5 October 2016.
Komisija je zaprimila primjedbe zainteresiranih strana.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
Proslijedila ih je Francuskoj uz mogućnost dostavljanja komentara o podnesenim primjedbama, koje je i zaprimila u dopisu od 8. lipnja 2016.
The invitation to tender and the background to it are described in detail in the opening decision (paragraphs (4) to (29)).
DETALJAN OPIS MJERE
That description is summarised in the sections below.
Poziv na podnošenje ponuda i kontekst koji je doveo do njegove objave detaljno su opisani u odluci o pokretanju postupka (uvodne izjave (4) i (29)).
The invitation to tender
U narednim poglavljima dan je sažetak opisa.
The French authorities consider that the security of electricity supply in Brittany is under threat because of the low capacity of power stations in the region, network constraints, growth in consumption, and high levels of temperature sensitivity.
Poziv na podnošenje ponuda
In 2010 a number of French authorities signed the Breton Electricity Pact (Pacte Électrique Breton, ‘PEB’), which is based on three pillars, of which the first is demand management, and the second is the production of renewable energy and the security of the electricity supply.
Francuska nadležna tijela smatraju da je pouzdanost opskrbe električnom energijom u Bretanji ugrožena zbog niskog kapaciteta proizvodnje električne energije u toj regiji, ograničenja mreže, rasta potrošnje te visoke toplinske osjetljivosti.
The third pillar comprises the strengthening and development of the local electricity network and the setting up of a conventional electricity production plant.
Nekoliko francuskih nadležnih tijela potpisalo je 2010.
It is this last which is the subject of the measure notified by France.
Pacte Electrique Breton („PEB”) koji se temelji na sljedeća tri stupa: prije svega, na kontroli potražnje, a zatim na proizvodnji obnovljive energije i osiguravanju opskrbe električnom energijom.
The tender notice, No 2011/S 120-198224, was published by the Minister for Energy in the Official Journal of the European Union on 25 June 2011.
Taj treći stup predmet je mjere koju je prijavila Francuska.
The Minister selected the winning project following an opinion given by the Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission de Régulation de l'Énergie, ‘CRE’), which had examined the projects in accordance with the relevant French regulations [4].
Poziv na podnošenje ponuda objavljen je na temelju članka L. 311-10 Zakona o energiji.
have a guaranteed active power of 450 MW (+ 15/-10 %) which the producer undertakes to be able to inject into the network;
imati zajamčenu aktivnu snagu od 450 MW (+ 15/– 10 %) za koju se proizvođač obvezuje da će moći dobaviti u mrežu;
guarantee that the delay in activating offers will not exceed 15 hours when the unit is at rest and two hours when the unit is in operation;
jamčiti da rok za pokretanje ponude za prilagodbu neće biti dulji od petnaest sati kada je postrojenje u mirovanju te dva sata kada je postrojenje u pogonu;
It is anticipated that the unit will operate for a duration of around 3000 hours/year full load equivalent from the date of entry into service.
Predviđeno je da postrojenje bude u pogonu otprilike 3000 sati godišnje pri punom opterećenju od datuma puštanja elektrane u pogon.
The total amount of the premium paid under the invitation to tender will be a maximum of EUR 94000/MW/year, value at 31 November 2011.
Premije isplaćene u okviru poziva na podnošenje ponuda iznosit će najviše 40 milijuna EUR godišnje.
The premium will be paid for a period of 20 years and will be indexed throughout the lifetime of the project to take account of operating and maintenance costs.
Premija se indeksira u visini od 20 % na proizvodne cijene, 20 % na troškove rada, 50 % na tarife za prijenos u regionalnoj mreži, 5 % na troškove električnog priključka i 5 % na troškove plinskog priključka.
The total amount paid will not exceed EUR 40 million a year.
Francuska nadležna tijela navela su da je iznos koji je predložio odabrani ponuditelj zbroj i. vrijednosti kapaciteta u iznosu od [50000 – 60000] [8] EUR/MW godišnje te tri uvjeta povezana sa zemljopisnom lokacijom projekta, odnosno: ii. dodatnog troška prijenosa plina u iznosu od [20000 – 40000] EUR/MW godišnje, iii. dodatnog troška priključivanja u iznosu od 6000 EUR/MW godišnje te iv. dodatnog troška provođenja posebnih okolišnih mjera u iznosu od 2000 EUR/MW godišnje.
Of this premium 20 % is indexed by reference to production prices, 20 % by reference to operating costs, 50 % by reference to transport costs on the regional grid, 5 % by reference to the cost of connection to the electricity grid, and 5 % by reference to the cost of connection to the gas grid.
Vrijednost kapaciteta odgovara iznosu pokrivenom dodatnim troškom povezanim s predviđenim datumom puštanja postrojenja u pogon.
The French authorities have specified that the total sum proposed by the successful tenderer is the result of (i) a capacity value equal to EUR [50000-60000] [8]/MW/year, and three values relating to the geographical location of the project, namely (ii) the additional cost of the transport of gas, EUR [20000-40000]/MW/year, (iii) the additional cost of connection, EUR 6000/MW/year, and (iv) the additional cost of special environmental measures, EUR 2000/MW/year.
Kandidati su taj dodatni trošak izračunali kao razliku prihoda od prodaje energije na tržištu i troškova brzog puštanja elektrane u pogon.
The capacity value corresponds to the total amount of the additional cost deriving from the anticipated date on which the plant is to start production.
CRE primjećuje da: „uzimajući u obzir trenutačne uvjete na tržištu te stanje potražnje za električnom energijom, korištenje kombinirane elektrane na plin nije ekonomski isplativa.
The candidates calculated this additional cost by subtracting the revenue generated by energy sales on the market from the costs resulting from the rapid start-up of the plant.
Ta će centrala postati isplativa tek kroz nekoliko godina.
The CRE observes that ‘given current market conditions and demand for electricity, the operation of a CCG plant is not economically viable.
Stoga kandidat trpi gubitak zbog prijevremenog puštanja postrojenja u pogon, za koji se smatra da je obuhvaćen tim elementom premije”.
A new 111 km gas pipeline is needed to supply the plant.
CEB će pridonijeti isplativosti elektrane plaćanjem tarife prijenosa plina.
The estimated cost of this project is around EUR 100 million, which will be prefunded by GRTgaz, a French company set up in 2005 to manage the gas transport network in France.
Naknada koja će se elektrani isplatiti za taj mehanizam u tom će se slučaju odbiti od premije isplaćene u okviru poziva na podnošenje ponuda.
CEB will contribute to the profitability of the project when it pays the gas transport price.
Trajanje
Law 2010-1488 of 7 December 2010 on the new organisation of the electricity market (the ‘NOME’ Act) introduced a capacity mechanism with the aim of ensuring security of supply for electricity in France [9].
Premija se dodjeljuje dvadeset godina od datuma puštanja postrojenja u pogon.
The facility in Brittany that has been selected following the invitation to tender will be required to participate in the national capacity mechanism.
Korisnik/Korisnici
Revenue received by the plant from this mechanism will be deducted where applicable from the premium actually paid in accordance with the invitation to tender.
Na temelju savjeta CRE-a ministar energetike odabrao je projekt u općini Landivisiau koji provodi Compagnie Electrique de Bretagne („CEB”), konzorcij Direct Energie – Siemens.
Duration
Odabrani ponuditelj mali je proizvođač na tržištu francuske proizvodnje i ne posjeduje drugo konvencionalno postrojenje u Bretanji.
The premium is granted for 20 years from the entry into service of the plant.
Zajamčena snaga postrojenja koju nudi CEB iznosi 422 MW.
Beneficiary(ies)
Odabrani ponuditelj bio je obvezan svoje postrojenje za proizvodnju električne energije pustiti u pogon najkasnije […].
The Minister for Energy, acting on the opinion of the CRE, selected a project located in the municipality of Landivisiau that had been put forward by Compagnie Electrique de Bretagne (‘CEB’), a consortium between Direct Energie and Siemens.
Francuska nadležna tijela u bilješci od 5. listopada 2016. navela su kašnjenje projekta.
The successful tenderer is a minor producer on the French energy production market and has no other conventional production facility in Brittany.
Novi datum puštanja postrojenja u pogon predviđen je za […].
The guaranteed power of the plant proposed by CEB is 422 MW.
Prema podacima koje je komisiji CRE dostavio odabrani ponuditelj, ponuditelj nije koristio i trenutačno ne koristi niti jednu drugu potporu koja bi se mogla pridodati potpori dodijeljenoj u okviru poziva na podnošenje ponuda.
CEB undertook to put its plant into industrial service no later than […].
Nadalje, naknada koja bi elektrani eventualno bila isplaćena na budućem tržištu kapaciteta odbit će se od premije isplaćene u okviru poziva na podnošenje ponuda.
In a memorandum dated 5 October 2016, the French authorities describe delays affecting the project.
Poslovni plan koji je dostavio CEB
The revised date anticipated for entry into service is […].
CEB je francuskim nadležnim tijelima kao popratnu dokumentaciju ponudi dostavio poslovni plan.
The business plan submitted by CEB
Prihodi nastali na temelju tolling ugovora određuju se prema uvjetima poslovnog plana koje bi CEB trebao ispuniti u trenutku poziva na podnošenje ponuda.
In support of the tender submitted to the French authorities, CEB also submitted a business plan.
Iznos tolling naknade procjenjuje se na temelju stohastičkog predviđanja.
The business plan shows an internal rate of return (‘IRR’) after tax of [5-10] %.
Za ažuriranje premije za kapacitet primjenjuje se pokazatelj paušalne naknade.
Revenue is based partly on a premium of EUR […]/MW/year and partly on net contractual remuneration from a tolling agreement representing an average remuneration of EUR […] per year.
Naknada uključuje i varijabilnu komponentu kojom se pokrivaju troškovi dobave, rada i održavanja pogona.