natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to terminate the investigation and were given the opportunity to comment.
Stoga se postupci sklapanja koja su izvršila vijetnamska društva koja su surađivala ne mogu smatrati izbjegavanjem mjera u smislu članka 13. stavka 2. osnovne uredbe.
The comments received were not of a nature to change the above conclusions.
Drugi kriterij: 25 % vrijednosti dodane donesenim dijelovima
The measures provided for in this regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Budući da je ispitnim postupkom utvrđeno da nije ispunjen kriterij od 60 % i postupak sklapanja ne može se smatrati izbjegavanjem mjera u smislu članka 13. stavka 2. osnovne uredbe, nije se smatralo potrebnim ispitivati ovaj kriterij.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uvjeti iz članka 13. stavka 2. točke (c): narušavanje korektivnih učinaka pristojbe i dokazi o dampingu
Article 1
Budući da je ispitnim postupkom utvrđeno da nije ispunjen kriterij od 60 % i postupak sklapanja ne može se smatrati izbjegavanjem mjera u smislu članka 13. stavka 2. osnovne uredbe, nije se smatralo potrebnim ispitivati ovaj kriterij.
The investigation initiated by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348 in order to determine if imports into the Union of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, originating in the People's Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex84279000 and ex84312000 and consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not (TARIC codes 8427900013 and 8431200013) are circumventing the measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, is hereby terminated.
Budući da dva društva na koja se odnosio ispitni postupak čine 100 % vijetnamskog uvoza tijekom izvještajnog razdoblja, nije se moglo utvrditi da se mjere na snazi u pogledu Kine izbjegavaju uvozom poslanim iz Vijetnama.
Article 2
ZAVRŠETAK ISPITNOG POSTUPKA
Customs authorities shall discontinue the registration of imports established in accordance with Article 2 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348.
S obzirom na nalaze navedene u uvodnim izjavama od 30. do 32., postojeći ispitni postupak u svrhu sprečavanja izbjegavanja mjera trebalo bi završiti.
Article 3
Stoga bi trebalo obustaviti evidentiranje uvoza ručnih paletnih viličara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova poslanih iz Vijetnama, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz Vijetnama ili ne, uvedeno Uredbom o pokretanju postupka, a tu uredbu trebalo bi staviti izvan snage.
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348 is hereby repealed.
Zainteresirane strane obaviještene su o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih je Komisija namjeravala završiti ispitni postupak te su imale mogućnost očitovanja.
Article 4
Zaprimljeni komentari nisu bili takve naravi da mogu promijeniti navedene zaključke.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora uspostavljenog člankom 15. stavkom 1.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036,
Done at Brussels, 21 February 2018.
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
The President
Završava se ispitni postupak pokrenut Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2017/1348 kako bi se utvrdilo izbjegavaju li se uvozom u Uniju ručnih paletnih viličara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova, tj. šasije i hidraulike, podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine, trenutačno razvrstanih u oznake KN ex84279000 i ex84312000 i poslanih iz Vijetnama, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz Vijetnama ili ne, (oznake TARIC 8427900013 i 8431200013) mjere uvedene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 1008/2011, kako je izmijenjena Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 372/2013.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Članak 2.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 189, 21.7.2005, p. 1).
Carinska tijela obustavljaju evidentiranje uvoza utvrđeno u skladu s člankom 2.
Council Regulation (EC) No 684/2008 of 17 July 2008 clarifying the scope of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 192, 19.7.2008, p. 1).
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1348.
Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not (OJ L 151, 16.6.2009, p. 1).
Članak 3.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 of 10 October 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China as extended to imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 268, 13.10.2011, p. 1).
Provedbena uredba (EU) 2017/1348 stavlja se izvan snage.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 of 22 April 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 112, 24.4.2013, p. 1).
Članak 4.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 946/2014 of 4 September 2014 amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti- dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China following a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 ( OJ L 265, 5.9.2014, p. 7).
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1346 of 8 August 2016 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of slightly modified hand pallet trucks originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 214, 9.8.2016, p. 1).
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2206 of 29 November 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 314, 30.11.2017, p. 12).
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 21. veljače 2018.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348 of 19 July 2017 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China by imports consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 188, 20.7.2017, p. 1).
Za Komisiju
Comext is a database on foreign trade statistics managed by Eurostat.
Predsjednik
Council Regulation (EU) 2018/264
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2018/264
of 19 February 2018
od 19. veljače 2018.
Articles 33(8) and 34(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 empowered the Commission to adopt detailed rules on the basic production levies and the coefficient for the calculation of the additional levy, to be collected from quota holders operating in the framework of the common organisation of markets in the sugar sector.
Komisija je na temelju članka 33. stavka 8. i članka 34. stavka 5.
Commission Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001 established the production levies and the coefficient for calculating the additional levy in the sugar sector.
Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 2038/1999 ovlaštena za donošenje detaljnih pravila za osnovne pristojbe na proizvodnju i koeficijenta za izračun dodatne pristojbe, koje se prikupljaju od nositelja kvota koji djeluju u okviru zajedničke organizacije tržištâ u sektoru šećera.
In the framework of the reform of the common market organisation for the sugar sector, Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999.
Uredbama Komisije (EZ) br. 2267/2000 i (EZ) br. 1993/2001 utvrđeni su iznosi pristojbi na proizvodnju i koeficijent za izračun dodatne pristojbe u sektoru šećera.
Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.
U okviru reforme organizacije zajedničkog tržišta za sektor šećera, Uredbom Vijeća (EZ) br. 1260/2001 stavljena je izvan snage i zamijenjena Uredba (EZ) br. 2038/1999.
Regulation (EC) No 318/2006, which was subsequently repealed and incorporated into Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, replaced the variable sugar production levy system of self-financing the production quota regime by a new production charge aimed at contributing to the financing of the expenditure occurring in the sugar sector under the common market organisation for sugar.
Uredbom Vijeća (EZ) br. 318/2006 stavlja se izvan snage i zamjenjuje Uredba (EZ) br. 1260/2001.
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, this temporary production charge remained applicable until 30 September 2017.
Uredbom (EZ) br. 318/2006, koja je naknadno stavljena izvan snage i ugrađena u Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 1234/2007, sustav promjenjivih pristojbi na proizvodnju šećera uz samofinanciranje režima proizvodnih kvota zamijenjen je novom pristojbom na proizvodnju čiji je cilj doprinijeti financiranju rashoda nastalih u sektoru šećera u okviru organizacije zajedničkog tržišta šećera.
In its Judgment of 9 February 2017 in Case C-585/15, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise, the Court of Justice declared invalid Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001.
Na temelju Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, kojom je stavljena izvan snage i zamijenjena Uredba (EZ) br. 1234/2007, ta se privremena pristojba na proizvodnju primjenjivala do 30. rujna 2017.
In that judgment, the Court held that Article 33(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of calculating the average loss, it is necessary to divide the total amount of the actual expenditure for export refunds for products which come under that provision by the total amount of the quantities of those products which were exported, regardless of whether or not refunds have in fact been paid in respect of the latter.
Svojom presudom od 9. veljače 2017. u predmetu C-585/15, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise Sud je proglasio nevaljanima uredbe (EZ) br. 2267/2000 i (EZ) br. 1993/2001.
Furthermore, the Court also stated that Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of the overall calculation of the production levies, it is necessary to take into account the average loss calculated by dividing the total amount of the actual expenditure for export refunds for products which come under that provision by the total amount of the quantities exported, regardless of whether or not refunds have in fact been paid in respect of the latter.
Sud je u toj presudi utvrdio da članak 33. stavak 1.
In order to comply with the Court's judgement, the production levies and the additional levies should therefore be fixed at the appropriate level.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2038/1999 treba tumačiti na način da je za izračun prosječnog gubitka potrebno podijeliti ukupni iznos stvarnih rashoda povezanih s izvoznim subvencijama za proizvode obuhvaćene tom odredbom s ukupnim izvezenim količinama tih proizvoda, bez obzira na to jesu li za te izvezene količine subvencije stvarno isplaćene.
In particular, the ‘average loss’ is to be calculated by dividing the actual total refunds paid by the total exported quantities for products which were eligible to refunds, regardless whether they were exported with or without a refund.
Nadalje, Sud je utvrdio da članak 33. stavak 2.
The application of the method indicated by the Court leads to a substantial decrease in the ‘average loss’ and the ‘overall loss’ to be covered by the levies for the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2038/1999 treba tumačiti na način da je pri ukupnom izračunu pristojbi na proizvodnju potrebno uzeti u obzir prosječni gubitak koji se izračunava dijeljenjem ukupnog iznosa stvarnih rashoda povezanih s izvoznim subvencijama za proizvode obuhvaćene tom odredbom s ukupnim izvezenim količinama tih proizvoda, bez obzira na to jesu li za te izvezene količine subvencije stvarno isplaćene.
The revision of the production levies for the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years will affect the amount payable by the sugar producers to the beet growers in respect of the difference between the maximum amount of the A or B levy and the amount of these levies charged for the marketing years concerned.
Kako bi se postupilo u skladu s presudom Suda, pristojbe na proizvodnju i dodatne pristojbe trebalo bi utvrditi na odgovarajućoj razini.
According to the rules establishing a common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector in force until 2006, the levies were paid by sugar manufacturers but the latter recovered 60 % of these costs from beet growers, by paying a lower beet price.
Konkretno, „prosječni gubitak” treba se izračunavati dijeljenjem stvarno isplaćenih ukupnih subvencija s ukupnim izvezenim količinama proizvoda koji ispunjavaju uvjete za subvenciju, bez obzira na to jesu li izvezene uz subvenciju ili bez nje.
Article 36(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 provided that when the amounts of the levies were set below the maximum level for the A or B levies (i.e. 2 % or 37,5 % of the intervention price for white sugar, respectively), sugar manufacturers had to pay beet sellers 60 % of the difference between the maximum amount of the levy in question and the amount of the base levy or the B levy actually charged.
Primjena metode koju je utvrdio Sud dovodi do znatnog smanjenja „prosječnog gubitka” i „ukupnog gubitka” koje se treba pokriti pristojbama za tržišne godine 1999./2000. i 2000./2001.
The revised amounts that sugar producers should pay back to beet sellers should therefore be established.
Revizija pristojbi na proizvodnju za tržišne godine 1999./2000. i 2000./2001. utjecat će na iznos koji su proizvođači šećera morali platiti uzgajivačima šećerne repe na temelju razlike između maksimalnog iznosa pristojbe A odnosno pristojbe B i iznosa tih pristojbi koji se zaračunavaju za dotične tržišne godine.
Only the difference between the old amounts and the new amounts should be reimbursed to beet sellers.
U skladu s pravilima kojima se uspostavlja zajednička organizacija tržištâ u sektoru šećera koja su bila snazi do 2006. pristojbe su plaćali proizvođači šećera, no oni su od uzgajivača šećerne repe naplaćivali 60 % tih troškova plaćajući nižu cijenu šećerne repe.
For the 1999/2000 marketing year, the overall loss not covered by the levies, recalculated in accordance with the method indicated by the Court, amounts to EUR 66941664.
Člankom 36. stavkom 2.
The coefficient referred to in Article 34(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 should be set accordingly and should be applicable retroactively for that marketing year.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2038/1999 bilo je predviđeno da, kada su iznosi pristojbi bili utvrđeni ispod maksimalne razine za pristojbe A ili B (tj.
For the 2000/2001 marketing year, the overall loss not covered by the levies, recalculated in accordance with the method indicated by the Court, amounts to EUR 49376802.
2 % odnosno 37,5 % interventne cijene za bijeli šećer), proizvođači šećera prodavateljima šećerne repe plaćaju 60 % razlike između maksimalnog iznosa dotične pristojbe i stvarno zaračunatog iznosa osnovne pristojbe odnosno pristojbe B.
For reasons of legal certainty, and to ensure uniform treatment of the economic operators concerned in different Member States, it is necessary to set a date by which the levies fixed by this Regulation should be established, as referred to in the second and third subparagraph of Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014.
Stoga bi trebalo utvrditi revidirane iznose koje bi proizvođači šećera trebali vratiti prodavateljima šećerne repe.
However, this deadline should not apply where Member States are required under national law to reimburse the operators concerned after that date.
Prodavateljima šećerne repe trebala bi se nadoknaditi samo razlika između starih i novih iznosa.
The difference between the sums that were unduly paid in respect of the production levies in the sugar sector determined by Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001 and the levies that are laid down by this Regulation should be reimbursed.
Za tržišnu godinu 1999./2000. ukupni gubitak koji nije obuhvaćen pristojbama, ponovno izračunan u skladu s metodom koju je utvrdio Sud, iznosi 66941664 EUR.
It follows from the Court's judgment that the corrected levies should apply from the same dates as the levies which were declared invalid.
Koeficijent iz članka 34. stavka 2.
The calculation of the production levies and the additional levies set out by this Regulation should therefore apply as from the entry into force of Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001,
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2038/1999 trebao bi se utvrditi u skladu s tim i trebao bi se primjenjivati retroaktivno za tu tržišnu godinu.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Za tržišnu godinu 2000./2001. ukupni gubitak koji nije obuhvaćen pristojbama, ponovno izračunan u skladu s metodom koju je utvrdio Sud, iznosi 49376802 EUR.
Article 1
Zbog pravne sigurnosti i radi osiguravanja jednakog postupanja prema dotičnim gospodarskim subjektima u različitim državama članicama potrebno je utvrditi datum do kojeg bi se pristojbe utvrđene ovom Uredbom trebale utvrditi, kako je navedeno u članku 2. stavku 2. drugom i trećem podstavku Uredbe Vijeća (EU, Euratom) br. 609/2014.
The production levies in the sugar sector for the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years shall be those set out in point (1) of the Annex.
Međutim, taj se rok ne bi trebao primjenjivati ako su države članice na temelju nacionalnog prava obvezne dotičnim subjektima nadoknaditi određeni iznos nakon tog datuma.
The coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the production levy for the 1999/2000 marketing year shall be that set out in point (2) of the Annex.
Trebalo bi nadoknaditi razliku između neopravdano plaćenih iznosa u pogledu pristojbi na proizvodnju u sektoru šećera utvrđene uredbama (EZ) br. 2267/2000 i (EZ) br. 1993/2001 i pristojbi utvrđenih u ovoj Uredbi.
The amounts payable by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the A and B levies for the 2000/2001 marketing year shall be those set out in point (3) of the Annex.
Iz presude Suda proizlazi da bi se ispravljene pristojbe trebale primjenjivati od istih datuma kao i pristojbe koje su proglašene nevaljanima.
Article 2
Izračun pristojbi na proizvodnju i dodatnih pristojbi utvrđenih u ovoj Uredbi trebao bi se stoga primjenjivati od datuma stupanja na snagu uredaba (EZ) br. 2267/2000 i (EZ) br. 1993/2001,
The date of establishment, as referred to in the second and third subparagraph of Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014, of the levies fixed by this Regulation shall be no later than 30 September 2018, except where Member States are prevented from respecting that deadline due to the application of national law on the recovery by economic operators of sums paid but not due.
DONIJELO JE OVU UREDBU:
The difference between the levies fixed by Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001 and the levies provided for in Article 1 of this Regulation shall be reimbursed to those economic operators that paid levies in respect of the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years, on duly justified application of the latter.
Članak 1.
Article 3
Pristojbe na proizvodnju u sektoru šećera za tržišne godine 1999./2000. i 2000./2001. utvrđene su u točki 1.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Priloga.
Article 1 shall apply from:
Koeficijent potreban za izračun dodatne pristojbe za pristojbu na proizvodnju za tržišnu godinu 1999./2000. utvrđen je u točki 2.
13 October 2000, as regards the 1999/2000 marketing year;
Priloga.
12 October 2001, as regards the 2000/2001 marketing year.
Iznosi koje proizvođači šećera plaćaju prodavateljima šećerne repe u pogledu pristojbi A i B za tržišnu godinu 2000./2001. utvrđen je u točki 3.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Priloga.
Done at Brussels, 19 February 2018.
Članak 2.
For the Council
Datum utvrđivanja, kako je naveden u članku 2. stavku 2. drugom i trećem podstavku Uredbe (EU, Euratom) br. 609/2014, za pristojbe utvrđene ovom Uredbom jest najkasnije 30. rujna 2018., osim ako države članice u poštovanju tog roka spriječi primjena nacionalnog prava o povratu gospodarskim subjektima nepravilno uplaćenih iznosa.
The President
Razlika između pristojbi utvrđenih uredbama (EZ) br. 2267/2000 i (EZ) br. 1993/2001 i pristojbi iz članka 1. ove Uredbe nadoknađuje se onim gospodarskim subjektima koji su platili pristojbe u pogledu tržišnih godina 1999./2000. i 2000./2001., uz valjano utemeljenu primjenu potonjih.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 of 13 September 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ L 252, 25.9.1999, p. 1).
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2267/2000 of 12 October 2000 fixing the production levies and the coefficient for calculating the additional levy in the sugar sector for the 1999/2000 marketing year (OJ L 259, 13.10.2000, p. 29).
Članak 1. primjenjuje se:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1993/2001 of 11 October 2001 fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the 2000/01 marketing year (OJ L 271, 12.10.2001, p. 15).
od 13. listopada 2000. u pogledu tržišne godine 1999./2000.,
Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).
od 12. listopada 2001. u pogledu tržišne godine 2000./2001.
Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1).
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1).
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 19. veljače 2018.
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671).
Za Vijeće
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 9 February 2017, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise, C-585/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:105.
Predsjednik