natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Judgment of 17 July 2008, Essent Netwerk Noord and Others, C-206/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413.
Kad je riječ o kogeneraciji, Komisija pretpostavlja da su mjere energetske učinkovitosti usmjerene na negativne vanjske učinke stvaranjem pojedinačnih poticaja kako bi se postigli ciljevi zaštite okoliša za energetsku učinkovitost i za smanjenje emisija stakleničkih plinova (vidjeti točke 35. i 142.
Judgment of 10 May 2016, Germany v Commission, T-47/15, ECLI:EU:T:2016:281.
EEAG-a).
Judgment of 16 May 2002, France v Commission, C-482/99 EU:C:2002:294, paragraph 37, and judgment of 10 May 2016, Germany v Commission, T-47/15, ECLI:EU:T:2016:281, paragraph 83.
U skladu s točkom 49.
To this effect, see judgment of 22 March 1977, Steinike & Weinlig, C-78/76, EU:C:1977:52, paragraph 21; judgment of 17 March 1993, Sloman Neptun v Bodo Ziesemer, Joined Cases C-72/91 and C-73/91, EU:C:1993:97, paragraph 19, and judgment of 10 May 2016, Germany v Commission, T-47/15, ECLI:EU:T:2016:281, paragraph 81.
EEAG-a države članice moraju dokazati da potpora ima poticajni učinak koji dovodi do promjene ponašanja korisnika u skladu s ciljem od zajedničkog interesa koji se želi postići.
See also judgment of 10 May 2016, Germany v Commission, T-47/15, ECLI:EU:T:2016:281, paragraph 112, and judgment of 11 December 2014, Austria v Commission, T-251/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:1060, paragraph 76.
Iz izračuna koje su dostavila njemačka tijela (vidjeti Table 5tablicu 5.) vidljivo je da su troškovi proizvodnje električne energije iz visokoučinkovite kogeneracije (LCOE) viši od tržišne cijene električne energije i da bez potpore takva djelatnost vjerojatno ne bi bila gospodarski održiva.
Commission Decision of 27 March 2014 on State aid SA.36511 (2014/C) (ex 2013/NN) — France — Support mechanism for renewable energies and caps on the CSPE — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 348, 3.10.2014, p. 78).
Kogeneracijska postrojenja na koja se izmjena odnosi dobit će potporu samo ako budu odabrana u konkurentnom natječajnom postupku i stoga ne postoji potreba za zahtjevom obrasca iz točke 51.
Judgment of 1 February 2017, Portovesme v Commission, C-606/14 P, ECLI:EU:C:2017:75, paragraph 91.
EEAG-a (vidjeti točku 52.
Commission Decision of 22 May 2002 on State aid NN 68/2000 — Germany — Law for the protection of electricity generation on the basis of combined heat and power of 12 May 2000 (OJ C 164, 10.7.2002, p. 5).
EEAG-a).
Ibidem.
Komisija stoga zaključuje da su njemačka tijela dokazala da je potpora za kogeneracijska postrojenja koja isporučuju električnu energiju u privatne mreže nužna i da će program potpore imati poticajni učinak.
Commission Decision of 22 August 2016 on State aid SA.43666 (2015/N) — Germany — Reduction of the KWKG surcharge for railways (OJ C 406, 4.11.2016, p. 1).
Prikladnost potpore, razmjernost i izbjegavanje neopravdanog narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja
Judgment of 14 January 2009, Kronoply v Commission,T-162/06, ECLI:EU:T:2009:2, especially paragraphs 65, 66, 74 and 75.
U skladu s točkom 145.
Judgment of 7 June 2001, Agrana Zucker und Stärke v Commission, Case T-187/99, ECLI:EU:T:2001:149, paragraph 74; judgment of 14 May 2002, Graphischer Maschinenbau v Commission, Case T-126/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:116, paragraphs 41-43; judgment of 15 April 2008, Nuova Agricast, Case C-390/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:224, paragraphs 68-69.
EEAG-a državna potpora može se smatrati prikladnim instrumentom za financiranje mjera energetske učinkovitosti, bez obzira na oblik u kojem se dodjeljuje.
Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1).
Premije povrh tržišne cijene prikladni su instrumenti potpore kojima se kogeneracijskim postrojenjima nadoknađuju viši troškovi proizvodnje električne energije iz visokoučinkovite kogeneracije jer su usmjerene na element dodatnih troškova koji nije obuhvaćen tržišnom cijenom.
Conclusions of the European Council of 23-24 October 2014.
Prijavljenom izmjenom dodala bi se nova kategorija operatora kogeneracije koji bi mogli sudjelovati u natječaju za dobivanje premije povrh tržišne cijene.
See Commission Decision of 23 July 2014 on State aid SA.38632 (2014/N) — Germany — EEG 2014 (OJ C 325, 2.10.2015, p. 4).
Ona odgovara operativnoj potpori za proizvodnju električne energije u energetski visokoučinkovitim kogeneracijskim postrojenjima te se stoga za ocjenu razmjernosti primjenjuje točka 151.
Commission decision of 22 May 2002 on State aid NN 68/2000 — Germany — Law for the protection of electricity generation on the basis of combined heat and power of 12 May 2000 (OJ C 164, 10.7.2002, p. 5).
EEAG-a.
See Conclusions of the European Council of 17 June 2010.
U pogledu ocjene razmjernosti u točki 151.
The Conclusions of the European Council of 17 June 2010 confirmed the energy efficiency target as one of the headline targets of the Union's new strategy for jobs and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
EEAG-a upućuje se na uvjete koji se primjenjuju na operativnu potporu za električnu energiju iz obnovljivih izvora kako je utvrđeno u odjeljku 3.3.2.1.
Under this process and in order to implement this objective at national level, Member States are required to set national targets in close dialogue with the Commission and to indicate, in their National Reform Programmes, how they intend to achieve them.
EEAG-a.
See also Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Energy 2020 — A Strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy (COM(2010) 639 final of 10 November 2010).
EEAG-a.
It places energy efficiency at the core of the Union energy strategy for 2020 and outlines the need for a new energy efficiency strategy that will enable all Member States to decouple energy use from economic growth.
(183) Kogeneracijska postrojenja na koja se izmjena odnosi pripadaju kategoriji definiranoj u točki 151. podtočki (a) EEAG-a: proizvedena električna energija prodavat će se javnosti (iako manjem broju korisnika nego u slučaju električne energije koja se prodaje u javnu mrežu).
See also Communication of 8 March 2011 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Energy Efficiency Plan 2011.
EEAG-a potpora se mora dodijeliti kao premija povrh tržišne cijene pri čemu proizvođači svoju električnu energiju prodaju izravno na tržištu.
The Communication confirmed that the Union is not on track to achieve its energy efficiency target.
Osim toga, korisnici podliježu standardnim odgovornostima za uravnoteženje, osim ako ne postoje likvidna tržišta dnevnog uravnoteženja, i, naposljetku, programom se mora osigurati da se proizvođače ne potiče na proizvodnju električne energije kad su tržišne cijene negativne.
To remedy that, the Energy Efficiency Plan 2011 spelled out a series of energy efficiency policies and measures covering the full energy chain, including energy generation of heat and electricity and underlying that waste heat should be recovered where possible and a greater use of high efficient cogeneration should be made where possible.
Program potpore u skladu je s točkom 124. podtočkom (a) EEAG-a jer će se potpora odabranim poduzetnicima isplaćivati kao premija povrh tržišne cijene i operator kogeneracijskog postrojenja mora prodati električnu energiju na tržištu (vidjeti prethodnu uvodnu izjavu 79.).
Judgment of 13 March 2001, PreussenElektra, Case C-379/98, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160.
Operator isto tako podliježe uobičajenim odgovornostima za uravnoteženje (vidjeti prethodnu uvodnu izjavu 79.).
Judgment of 22 June 2006, Forum 187 v Commission, Joined Cases C-182/03, C-217/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:266, paragraph 147.
Naposljetku, programom se ne stvaraju poticaji za proizvodnju u vrijeme negativnih cijena.
Commission Decision 2011/528/EU of 8 March 2011 on State aid measure C 24/09 (ex N 446/08) —State aid for energy-intensive businesses under the Green Electricity Act in Austria (OJ L 235, 10.9.2011, p. 42).
Time se povećavaju poticaji za prodaju električne energije u vrijeme veće potražnje jer će se time povećati prihodi i, s druge strane, smanjiti poticaji za proizvodnju u vrijeme negativnih cijena.
OJ C 83, 7.4.2009, p. 1.
Osim toga, Njemačka obustavlja potporu u vrijeme negativnih cijena (vidjeti prethodnu uvodnu izjavu 79.).
Cat.
Mjere su u skladu s odredbom o transparentnosti.
C end-consumers (non-electro-intensive)
Na temelju razloga utvrđenih u odjeljcima 7.3.1. do 7.3.4.
Germany indicated that this threshold ensures that the reductions do not fulfil all criteria of the state aid within the meaning of the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 [15] (de minimis).
DONIJELA JE OVU ODLUKU:
After the amendments introduced by the Law of 22 December 2016, beneficiaries of reductions will be electro-intensive users fulfilling the criteria described under recital 20 above.
Članak 1.
That is, electro-intensive users within the meaning of the BesAR.
Smanjenja dodatnih pristojbi za kogeneraciju koje je Njemačka provela u skladu s KWKG-om iz 2016. u suprotnosti s člankom 108. stavkom 3.
The German authorities note that the reductions have a limited impact as the CHP surcharge in relative terms is not so high.
UFEU-a spojiva su s unutarnjim tržištem u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 3. točkom (c) UFEU-a nakon izmjena od 22. prosinca 2016.
There was a burden sharing between network operators.
Članak 5.
The law, however, did not establish any CHP surcharge to finance the support and as mentioned in the previous recital there were no reduced CHP surcharges for certain categories of end-consumers.
Ova Odluka upućena je Saveznoj Republici Njemačkoj.
Second, the KWKG 2016 also provides for support for electricity that is auto-consumed, i.e. aid that is not even injected into the grids operated by network operators.
Za Komisiju
Fifth, the law contains a maximum budget that also limits the increase of the CHP surcharge.
Članica Komisije
And sixth, the KWKG 2016 provides for a cap to the CHP surcharge for Category B and Category C end-consumers.
SL C 406, 4.11.2016., str. 21.
Such a confirmation of eligibility for support did not exist under the KWKG 2000.
Odluka Komisije od 24. listopada 2016. o državnoj potpori SA.42393 (2016/C) (ex 2015/N) – Njemačka – Reforma potpore kogeneraciji u Njemačkoj – Poziv na podnošenje primjedaba u skladu s člankom 108. stavkom 2.
(111) Already the KWKG 2002 presents several important alterations to the KWKG 2000: obligation to pay a premium on top of market price (instead of mere purchase obligation of electricity for a given price), guarantee provided by law that network operators will be compensated for the extra costs resulting from the obligation to pay the premium, creation of the uniform CHP surcharge, central role of transmission network operators in centralising the financial flows linked to support payments and CHP surcharge and introduction of caps to the CHP surcharge for two categories of end-consumers (Category B and Category C).
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL C 406 od 4.11.2016., str. 21.)
Indeed, the CHP-surcharge pursues a specific objective namely financing of a support for CHP installations.
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 od 13. srpnja 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/1802
Odluka Političkog i sigurnosnog odbora (ZVSP) 2017/1802
Having regard to Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP of 3 July 2013 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) [1], and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Odluku Vijeća 2013/354/ZVSP od 3. srpnja 2013. o Policijskoj misiji Europske unije za palestinska područja (EUPOL COPPS) [1], a posebno njezin članak 9. stavak 1.,
Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 2013/354/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.
Na temelju članka 9. stavka 1.
On 17 February 2015, the PSC adopted Decision EUPOL COPPS/1/2015 [2], appointing Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 16 February 2015 to 30 June 2015.
Odluke 2013/354/ZVSP Politički i sigurnosni odbor (PSO) ovlašten je, u skladu s člankom 38. trećim stavkom Ugovora, donositi odgovarajuće odluke u svrhu obavljanja političkog nadzora i strateškog usmjeravanja Policijske misije Europske unije za palestinska područja (EUPOL COPPS), uključujući odluku o imenovanju voditelja misije.
The mandate of Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS has been extended several times, most recently by PSC Decision EUPOL COPPS/1/2016 [3], which extended his mandate as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS until 30 June 2017.
PSO je 17. veljače 2015. donio Odluku EUPOL COPPS/1/2015 [2], kojom je g.
On 22 September 2017, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Kauko AALTOMAA as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 1 October 2017 to 30 June 2018,
Rodolphe MAUGET imenovan voditeljem misije EUPOL COPPS za razdoblje od 16. veljače 2015. do 30. lipnja 2015.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Mandat g.
Article 1
Rodolphea MAUGETA kao voditelja misije EUPOL COPPS produljen je nekoliko puta, posljednji put Odlukom PSO-a EUPOL COPPS/1/2016 [3], kojom je njegov mandat kao voditelja misije EUPOL COPPS produljen do 30. lipnja 2017.
Mr Kauko AALTOMAA is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) from 1 October 2017 to 30 June 2018.
Visoki predstavnik Unije za vanjske poslove i sigurnosnu politiku predložio je 22. rujna 2017. imenovanje g.
Article 2
Kaukoa AALTOMAA voditeljem misije EUPOL COPPS od 1. listopada 2017. do 30. lipnja 2018.,
Done at Brussels, 28 September 2017.
Članak 1.
For the Political and Security Committee
G. Kauko AALTOMAA imenuje se voditeljem Policijske misije Europske unije za palestinska područja (EUPOL COPPS) za razdoblje od 1. listopada 2017. do 30. lipnja 2018.
The Chairperson
Članak 2.
OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 12.
Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan donošenja.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/381 of 17 February 2015 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/1/2015) (OJ L 64, 7.3.2015, p. 37).
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 28. rujna 2017.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2016/1193 of 12 July 2016 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/1/2016) (OJ L 197, 22.7.2016, p. 1).
Za Politički i sigurnosni odbor
Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP [1],
uzimajući u obzir Odluku Vijeća (ZVSP) 2016/849 od 27. svibnja 2016. o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Demokratske Narodne Republike Koreje i o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 2013/183/ZVSP [1],
On 27 May 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849.
Vijeće je 27. svibnja 2016. donijelo Odluku (ZVSP) 2016/849.
On 11 September 2017, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) adopted Resolution 2375 (2017) (‘UNSCR 2375 (2017)’), in which it expressed the gravest concern for both the nuclear test by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (‘DPRK’)on 2 September 2017 and the danger posed to the peace and stability of the region and beyond by the DPRK's ongoing nuclear- and ballistic missile-related activities.
Vijeće sigurnosti Ujedinjenih naroda („VSUN”) donijelo je 11. rujna 2017.
The UNSC also determined that a clear threat to international peace and security continues to exist.
Rezoluciju 2375 (2017) („RVSUN 2375 (2017)”) u kojoj je izrazilo najozbiljniju zabrinutost zbog nuklearnog pokusa koji je Demokratska Narodna Republika Koreja („DNRK”) provela 2. rujna 2017. i opasnosti koju tekuće nuklearne i balističke aktivnosti DNRK-a predstavljaju za mir i stabilnost u regiji i izvan nje.
UNSCR 2375 (2017) extends the prohibition on the export and import of certain goods to and from the DPRK and the restrictions on investment in the DPRK.
VSUN je također utvrdio da jasna prijetnja međunarodnom miru i sigurnosti postoji i dalje.
UNSCR 2375 (2017) also prohibits issuing work authorisations for DPRK nationals in the jurisdiction of Member States.
RVSUN-om 2375 (2017) proširuje se zabrana izvoza i uvoza određene robe iz DNRK-a i u DNRK, kao i ograničenje ulaganja u DNRK-u.
UNSCR 2375 (2017) furthermore provides for enhanced maritime interdiction of cargo vessels.
RVSUN-om 2375 (2017) također se zabranjuje izdavanje radnih dozvola za državljane DNRK-a u nadležnosti država članica.
Further action by the Union is necessary to implement certain measures in this Decision.
RVSUN-om 2375 (2017) nadalje se predviđa pojačana pomorska zabrana za teretna plovila.
Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Radi provedbe određenih mjera predviđenih u ovoj Odluci potrebno je daljnje djelovanje Unije.
in Article 1(1), point (b) is replaced by the following:
Odluka (ZVSP) 2016/849 mijenja se kako slijedi:
all items, materials, equipment, goods and technology, as determined by the UN Security Council or the Committee established pursuant to paragraph 12 of UNSCR 1718 (2006) (“the Sanctions Committee”) in accordance with paragraph 8(a)(ii) of UNSCR 1718 (2006), paragraph 5(b) of UNSCR 2087 (2013), paragraph 20 of UNSCR 2094 (2013), paragraph 25 of UNSCR 2270 (2016) and paragraph 4 of UNSCR 2375 (2017), which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes;’;
u članku 1. stavku 1. točka (b) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
in Article 1(1), point (i) is replaced by the following:
svih predmeta, materijala, opreme, robe i tehnologije, kako su utvrđeni od strane Vijeća sigurnosti UN-a ili Odbora osnovanog na temelju stavka 12.
any other item listed in the conventional arms dual-use list adopted by the Sanctions Committee pursuant to paragraph 7 of UNSCR 2321 (2016) and paragraph 5 of UNSCR 2375 (2017).’;
RVSUN-a 1718 (2006) („Odbor za sankcije”) u skladu sa stavkom 8. točkom (a) podtočkom ii.
the following Article is inserted:
RVSUN-a 1718 (2006), stavkom 5. točkom (b) RVSUN-a 2087 (2013), stavkom 20.
‘Article 6c
RVSUN-a 2094 (2013), stavkom 25.
The procurement of textiles (including but not limited to fabrics and partially or fully completed apparel products) from the DPRK by nationals of Member States, or using the flag vessels or aircraft of Member States, shall be prohibited, whether or not originating in the territory of the DPRK.
RVSUN-a 2375 (2017), koji bi mogli doprinijeti programima DNRK-a povezanima s nuklearnim oružjem, balističkim projektilima ili drugim oružjem za masovno uništavanje;”; 2. u članku 1. stavku 1. točka i. zamjenjuje se sljedećim: „(i)
Paragraph 1 shall not apply where the Sanctions Committee has granted approval in advance on a case-by-case basis.
umeće se sljedeći članak:
Member States may allow imports of textiles (including but not limited to fabrics and partially or fully completed apparel products) for which written contracts have been finalised prior to 11 September 2017, up to 10 December 2017, provided that the Sanctions Committee is notified by 24 January 2018 with details about those imports.’;
RVSUN-a 2375 (2017).”; 3. umeće se sljedeći članak:
Article 9 is replaced by the following:
„Članak 6.c 1.
‘Article 9
Zabranjuje se nabava tekstila (uključujući, ali ne ograničavajući se na tkanine i djelomično ili potpuno dovršene odjevne predmete) iz DNRK-a koju vrše državljani država članica ili koja se vrši uporabom plovila ili zrakoplova pod zastavama država članica bez obzira na to potječu li s državnog područja DNRK-a.
The import, purchase or transfer from the DPRK of petroleum products shall be prohibited.
2.
The direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer to the DPRK, by nationals of Member States or through or from the territories of Member States or using the flag vessels or aircraft of Member States, and whether or not originating in their territories, of all refined petroleum products shall be prohibited.
Stavak 1. ne primjenjuje se ako je Odbor za sankcije prethodno dao odobrenje na pojedinačnoj osnovi.
Paragraph 2 shall not apply with respect to the direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer to the DPRK, by nationals of Member States or through or from the territories of Member States or using the flag vessels or aircraft of Member States, and whether or not originating in their territories, of refined petroleum products in the amount of up to 500000 barrels during an initial period of three months beginning on 1 October 2017 and ending on 31 December 2017, and refined petroleum products in the amount of up to 2000000 barrels per year during a period of 12 months beginning on 1 January 2018 and annually thereafter, provided that:
Države članice mogu dozvoliti uvoz tekstila (uključujući, ali ne ograničavajući se na tkanine i djelomično ili potpuno dovršene odjevne predmete) za koje su pisani ugovori dovršeni prije 11. rujna 2017. do 10. prosinca 2017. pod uvjetom da je Odbor za sankcije obaviješten do 24. siječnja 2018. o pojedinostima o navedenom uvozu.”;
the Member State shall notify the Sanctions Committee every 30 days of the amount of such supply, sale, or transfer to the DPRK of refined petroleum products along with information about all the parties to the transaction; and
4. članak 9. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
the supply, sale, or transfer of refined petroleum products involve no individuals or entities that are associated with the DPRK's nuclear or ballistic missile programmes or other activities prohibited by UNSCRs 1718 (2006), 1874 (2009), 2087 (2013), 2094 (2013), 2270 (2016), 2321 (2016), 2356 (2017), 2371 (2017) or 2375 (2017), including designated individuals or entities, or individuals or entities acting on their behalf or at their direction, or entities owned or controlled by them, directly or indirectly, or individuals or entities assisting in the evasion of sanctions; and
„Članak 9.
the supply, sale, or transfer of refined petroleum products are exclusively for livelihood purposes of DPRK nationals and unrelated to generating revenue for the DPRK's nuclear or ballistic missile programmes or other activities prohibited by UNSCRs 1718 (2006), 1874 (2009), 2087 (2013), 2094 (2013), 2270 (2016), 2321 (2016), 2356 (2017), 2371 (2017) or 2375 (2017).
Zabranjen je uvoz, kupnja ili prijenos iz DNRK-a naftnih derivata.
The Union shall take the necessary measures in order to determine the relevant items to be covered by this Article.’;
Zabranjena je izravna ili neizravna opskrba, prodaja ili prijenos u DNRK svih rafiniranih naftnih derivata od strane državljana država članica ili preko državnih područja država članica ili s tih područja, ili uz uporabu plovila ili zrakoplova pod zastavom država članica, preko njihovih državnih područja ili od strane njihovih državljana ili uz uporabu plovila ili zrakoplova pod njihovom zastavom, bez obzira na to potječu li ti proizvodi s njihovih državnih područja.
‘Article 9b
3.