natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As non-aeronautical income, KFBG listed income factors such as the airport shops, the parking at the airport, the freight storehouse and the income from rent and lease agreements.
Austrija je potvrdila da nije bilo potrebe zaposliti novo osoblje ili proširiti postojeću infrastrukturu ili drugu opremu radi pružanja usluga novim zračnim prijevoznicima ili radi novih linija (primjerice, bilo je dovoljno traka za prtljagu i dovoljno zaposlenika).
The average income of these sources less the costs of these sources, measured on the basis of observed data from recent years, resulted in an average non-aeronautical income of EUR […] per passenger.
Stoga Komisija zaključuje da su dodatni troškovi bili ograničeni na poticaje ponuđene programom poticaja iz 2005.
Brought down to a round figure, KFBG indicated EUR […] of non-aeronautical income per passenger.
Uz to, KLU je očekivao da će svaki novi zračni prijevoznik ili linija donijeti nove prihode od zrakoplovnih i nezrakoplovnih usluga.
All those underlying assumptions appear reasonable.
S obzirom na to da je razina troškova ostala stabilna, prema stajalištu Austrije svaki bi novi prijevoznik ili linija pozitivno pridonijeli profitabilnosti zračne luke.
In particular, they are based on cost and revenue observations and, in the case of cost data, on an elaborate cost measurement system.
KLU je stoga iz ex ante perspektive mogao očekivati da će svaki novi zračni prijevoznik ili linija dovesti do povećanja prihoda jer nisu iziskivali nikakva istovremena ulaganja.
These established values for costs and incomes of KFBG were used subsequently in the cost-benefit analysis in different calculation models.
Komisija smatra da je program poticaja iz 2005. iz ex ante perspektive doista bio dodatno profitabilan.
These models represented different envisaged routes from and to KLU with different aircrafts and under the assumption of varying degrees of capacity utilisation.
Taj zaključak potvrđuje činjenica da je KFBG nakon uvođenja programa poticaja iz 2005. doista uspio privući niz novih zračnih prijevoznika (kao što su Air Berlin, Robin Hood, Condor, Lufthansa, Germanwings), povećati intenzitet linija do postojećih odredišta (AUA) i uspostaviti nove linije.
The routes chosen corresponded to typical routes of interest of a small regional airport such as Klagenfurt airport.
KLU-ova strategija za povećanje poslovanja utemeljena na popustima bila je uspješna.
On request of the Commission, Austria submitted additional models, with the aim of covering all typical scenarios and possible routes of interest for KFBG in 2005.
Komisija dalje primjećuje da bi prilikom procjene programa poticaja iz 2005. trebala procijeniti i u kojoj mjeri bi se ti sporazumi mogli smatrati dijelom provedbe opće strategije zračne luke u cilju ostvarivanja profitabilnosti, barem dugoročno.
Austria has submitted that KLU expected that no additional investments would be required to provide additional airport services to airlines attracted by the 2005 incentive scheme.
U tom pogledu, Komisija mora uzeti u obzir činjenične dokaze koji su bili dostupni i promjene koje su se mogle razumno očekivati u trenutku donošenja programa poticaja iz 2005., a osobito prevladavajuće uvjete na tržištu.
In this context, the Commission observes that the 2005 incentive scheme offered discounts only for new airlines, new connections, or increased passenger numbers with the consequence that it did not impact negatively on the status quo at the airport.
Konkretno, Komisija bi trebala uzeti u obzir promjene uvedene liberalizacijom tržišta zračnog prijevoza, ulazak na tržište i razvoj niskobudžetnih prijevoznika i ostalih operatora izravnih letova (eng. „point-to-point”), promjene u ustrojstvenoj i gospodarskoj strukturi sektora zračnih luka te stupanj diversifikacije i složenosti funkcija koje obavljaju zračne luke, rast tržišnog natjecanja između zračnih prijevoznika i zračnih luka, nesigurno gospodarsko okruženje zbog promjena u prevladavajućim uvjetima na tržištu ili druge nesigurnosti u gospodarskom okruženju.
Austria confirmed that there was no need to hire new staff or to expand existing infrastructure or other equipment in order to serve new airlines or connections (for instance the existing baggage belts and personnel were sufficient).
Naposljetku, Komisija napominje da je infrastruktura zračne luke KLU otvorena svim zračnim prijevoznicima i nije namijenjena isključivo određenom zračnom prijevozniku.
Hence, the Commission concludes that the incremental costs were limited to the incentives offered by the 2005 incentive scheme.
Nadalje, program poticaja iz 2005. objavljen je na web-mjestu KLU-a i bio je otvoren za sve zainteresirane zračne prijevoznike.
Moreover, KLU expected that with any new airline or connection, aeronautical as well as non-aeronautical revenues would be generated.
S obzirom na ta razmatranja, Komisija zaključuje da je pri donošenju programa poticaja iz 2005.
Given that the level of costs remained stable, any new airline or connection would, according to Austria, provide a positive contribution to the airport's profitability.
KLU djelovao kao subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
KLU could therefore expect from an ex ante perspective that any new airline or connection would lead to an increase of revenues as no investments were necessary at the same time.
Stoga uključenim zračnim prijevoznicima tom mjerom nije data nikakva gospodarska prednost i ta mjera nije činila državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The Commission is of the view that indeed the 2005 incentive scheme has been incrementally profitable form an ex ante perspective.
UFEU-a.
This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that KFBG indeed managed to attract a number of new airlines (such as Air Berlin, Robin Hood, Condor, Lufthansa, Germanwings), to intensify existing destinations (AUA), and to establish new connections after the introduction of the 2005 incentive scheme.
U tim se okolnostima pri primjeni načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu u obzir doista moraju uzeti kombinirani učinci programa poticaja i bilateralnog sporazuma.
KLU's discount-based strategy to increase its business was successful.
Sklapanje sporazuma o nagodbi s AUA-om i primjena programa poticaja iz 2005. na AUA
The available data finally demonstrates that the 2005 incentive scheme resulted in a gradual increase of revenue for the airport (aviation and non-aeronautical revenues from EUR […] in 2006 to EUR […] in 2010).
AUA pružanjem usluga zračnog prijevoza obavlja gospodarsku djelatnosti i stoga je poduzetnik u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The Commission further notes that when assessing the 2005 incentive scheme, it should also assess the extent to which the arrangements can be considered part of the implementation of an overall strategy of the airport to lead to profitability at least in the long term.
UFEU-a.
Notably, the Commission should take into account the market changes induced by the liberalisation in the air transport market, the market entry and development of low cost carriers and other point-to-point carriers, changes in the organisational and economic structure of the airport industry as well as the degree of diversification and complexity of the functions undertaken by airports, the enhancement of the competition between airlines and airports, the uncertain economic environment due to the changes in the prevailing market conditions or any other uncertainty in the economic environment.
Vremenski okvir za procjenu dodatnih troškova i prihoda
The Commission notes that, as described in recitals 279-280, several reasons (such as the shortfalls regarding the payments of airport charges from October 2003 to October 2005 by AUA as well as the departure of Ryanair as of October 2005) led KLU to consider the 2005 incentive scheme a necessary step in ensuring its future viability and profitability.
Kada odlučuje hoće li sklopiti sporazum o uslugama zračne luke i/ili sporazum o marketinškim uslugama, subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu odabrat će vremenski okvir za svoju procjenu na temelju vremena valjanosti sporazuma.
Finally, the Commission notes that the airport infrastructure of KLU is open to all airlines and not dedicated to a specific airline.
Drugim riječima, razuman subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu procijenit će dodatne troškove i prihode za razdoblje primjene sporazuma.
Likewise the 2005 incentive scheme was published on the website of KLU and was open to all interested airlines.
U ovom se predmetu mora primijetiti posebnost situacije KFBG-a u trenutku potpisivanja sporazuma s AUA-om.
In the light of these considerations, the Commission concludes that KLU acted like a MEO when adopting the 2005 incentive scheme.
AUA je jednostrano smanjio svoje isplate za u to vrijeme važeće pristojbe KLU-a za prihvat i otpremu..
Therefore, the measure did not grant the affected airlines any economic advantage and did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article of 107(1) TFEU.
Stoga je KFBG 17. studenoga 2003. podnio tužbu protiv AUA-a pred lokalnim okružnim sudom zbog nepodmirenih dugovanja za pristojbe zračne luke.
It has to be emphasised that this conclusion only holds for airlines to which the 2005 incentive scheme was applied as such.
Kada je KFBG nakon tog spora potpisivao sporazum o nagodbi od 20. listopada 2005. morao je stoga uzeti u obzir ne samo naknade zračne luke koje će AUA plaćati u budućnosti već i još nepodmirene naknade zračne luke iz prethodnog razdoblja, a za koje se KFBG nadao da će ih naplatiti.
Whenever the application of the scheme to a given airline was combined with a bilateral agreement, for instance a marketing agreement, this conclusion does not automatically apply.
Procjena
Indeed, in such circumstances, the combined effects of the incentive scheme and of the bilateral agreement have to be taken into account when applying the MEO principle.
Prvi sudski spor pred lokalnim okružnim sudom odnosio se na tužbu KFBG-a protiv AUA-a zbog nepodmirenih dugovanja za pristojbe zračne luke.
The conclusion of the settlement agreement with AUA and the application of the 2005 incentive scheme to AUA
Drugi sudski spor odnosio se na tužbu AUA protiv KFBG-a na temelju prava o tržišnom natjecanju pred nacionalnim sudom za kartele.
AUA, by providing air transport services, performs an economic activity and therefore constitutes an undertaking within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
U okviru sporazuma o nagodbi dogovorene su sljedeće točke:
In order to assess whether an agreement between a publicly-owned airport with public resources at its disposal and an airline confers an economic advantage on the latter, it is necessary to analyse whether that agreement complied with the MEO principle as described above under recitals 261 to 278.
AUA je pristao platiti KFBG-u […] EUR,
Time frame for the Assessment of incremental costs and revenues
obje su se stranke složile da program poticaja iz 2005. postajei dio sporazuma o nagodbi i da će se primjenjivati na AUA od 1. listopada 2003.
When deciding on whether to enter into an airport services agreement and/or a marketing services agreement, a MEO will choose a time frame for its assessment based on the term of the agreement.
Austrija tvrdi da KFBG/DMG prije sklapanja sporazuma o nagodbi s AUA-om nije pripremio ex ante poslovni plan.
In other words, a prudent MEO will assess the incremental costs and revenues for the term of application of the agreement.
Objasnila je da su KFBG, KLH i odvjetničko društvo koje je zastupalo KFBG u oba sudska postupka prije potpisivanja sporazuma o nagodbi detaljno procijenili pravne i gospodarske prednosti i nedostatke njegova potpisivanja.
In this case a particularity has to be observed for the situation of KFBG at the moment of signing the agreement with AUA.
Kako bi dokazala te procjene i razmatranja Austrija je dostavila velik broj izvješća i zapisnika koje je upravni odbor KFBG-a dostavio nadzornom odboru KFBG-a te dostupne pravne dokumente iz pravnih postupaka.
On 20 October 2005 KFBG had to take into consideration not only the development of its contractual relation with AUA for the future, but also the past until October 2003.
Iz tih se dokumenata može izvesti sljedeći zaključak:
Since 1 October 2003 AUA had unilaterally reduced its payments for the turnaround fees due at that time at KLU.
S jedne strane, AUA je u listopadu 2005. na ime nepodmirenih pristojbi za prihvat i opremu KLU-u dugovao ukupno […] EUR.
On 17 November 2003 KFBG therefore brought against AUA a civil law action at the local district court concerning the airport fees still due.
S druge strane, mora se primijetiti da je AUA u tom postupku 7. siječnja 2004. dostavio opširan odgovor na tužbu.
When signing the settlement agreement on 20 October 2005 following this dispute, KFBG therefore had to take into consideration not only the future airport charges to be paid by AUA but also the still outstanding airport charges of the past period, which it hoped to recover.
KFBG je stoga bio suočen sa snažnim pravnim protivljenjem AUA-a dok je od njega nastojao naplatiti svoja potraživanja cjelokupnih naknada zračne luke.
Assessment
Istodobno su nepodmirene naknade zračne luke i trajanje spora koji je bio u tijeku snažno utjecali na gospodarsko stanje KFBG-a.
On 20 October 2005 KFBG and AUA signed a settlement agreement concerning the period from 1 October 2003 to 20 October 2005.
Izvješća nadzornog odbora KFBG-a pokazuju da su nepodmirene naknade zračne luke imale vrlo negativan učinak na likvidnost KFBG-a te su zbog toga dioničari KFBG-a morali društvu dati bespovratna sredstva u iznosu od […] EUR.
In this settlement agreement the two parties agreed to end two different ongoing litigations.
Tu potrebu za novcem potvrđuju izvještaji o novčanim tokovima za godine od 2003. do 2005.
The first litigation at the local district court concerned the civil law action of KFBG against AUA concerning the airport fees still due.
Kao što se može vidjeti iz pravnih dokumenata iz postupka, KFBG nije mogao zatražiti donošenje privremene mjere radi osiguranja novčane tražbine protiv AUA-a jer u situaciji KFBG-a uvjeti za taj pravni instrument nisu bili ispunjeni.
The second litigation concerned an action of AUA against KFBG in competition law at the national cartel court.
Istodobno, AUA je odbio platiti ukupni iznos pristojbi za prihvat i otpremu tvrdeći da su te pristojbe mnogo veće od pristojbi za prihvat i otpremu koje je KLU-u u isto vrijeme plaćao Ryanair.
The following points were agreed within the settlement agreement:
AUA je zahtijevao jednako postupanje u odnosu na Ryanair i svoje navodno pravo na uvjete jednake onima koji vrijede za Ryanair temeljio na nekoliko argumenata: KLU-ovoj obvezi sklapanja ugovora i njegovoj obvezi jednakog postupanja, zlouporabi vladajućeg položaja od strane KLU-a i zaštiti od nepoštenog tržišnog natjecanja.
AUA agreed to pay EUR […] to KFBG,
Nadalje, AUA je tvrdio da je KLU prekršio članak 63. zakona Luftfahrtgesetz (Nacionalni zakon o zrakoplovstvu; dalje u tekstu: „LFG”) i članak 20. uredbe Zivilflugplatz-Betriebsordnung (Uredba o upravljanju civilnim zračnim lukama; dalje u tekstu: „ZFBO”).
both parties agreed that the 2005 incentive scheme became part of the settlement agreement and was to be applied for AUA as of 1 October 2003.
Prema članku 63.
Austria asserts that KFBG/DMG did not prepare an ex ante business plan before concluding the settlement agreement with AUA.
LFG-a civilne zračne luke moraju biti dostupne svim sudionicima zračnog prometa pod istim uvjetima.
It explained that prior to the signature of the settlement agreement, KFBG, KLH and the law firm representing KFBG in both court proceedings had evaluated in detail the legal and economic advantages and disadvantages of signing the agreement.
Prema članku 20.
To demonstrate these evaluations and considerations Austria has submitted numerous reports and protocols submitted by the management board of KFBG to the supervisory board of KFBG as well as the available legal documents of the legal proceedings.
ZFBO-a pristojbe zračne luke moraju se temeljiti na objektivnim karakteristikama.
From these documents the following conclusion can be drawn:
Budući da ti pravni argumenti prima facie nisu bili potpuno neutemeljeni, KFBG nije mogao biti siguran da će AUA izgubiti građanski postupak pred lokalnim okružnim sudom.
On the one hand, AUA had in October 2005 a total debt of EUR […] of unpaid turnaround fees towards KLU.
Nadalje, kako je vidljivo iz korespondencije između KFBG-a i AUA-a u dvama pravnim postupcima, AUA je tijekom postupaka prijetio KFBG-u da će prestati opsluživati KLU kao jedno od svojih odredišta.
For this reason KFBG had brought a civil law action at the local district court against AUA, as it believed that AUA was not entitled to unilaterally reduce its payments as of October 2003.
AUA-ova usluga zračnog prijevoza između Klagenfurta i Beča, glavnog grada Austrije, bila je i još je uvijek najvažnija zračna linija za KLU.
As KFBG had fulfilled its obligations from its air service agreement with AUA, it seemed consequent for KFBG to take legal action.
Stoga je za KFBG bilo od presudne važnosti zadržati redovnu liniju s Bečom koji je AUA-ovo čvorište.
On the other hand it has to be observed that AUA submitted on 7 January 2004 a lengthy defence plea in this proceeding.
Zbog te prijetnje KFBG je 2004. i 2005. tražio alternativne zračne prijevoznike kako bi osigurao zračnu liniju s Bečom u slučaju da AUA doista prestane opsluživati KLU.
KFBG was therefore facing strong legal opposition of AUA while trying to enforce its claims of payment of the full airport charges by AUA.
Kako je izjavila Austrija, KFBG nije uspio pronaći alternativnog zračnog prijevoznika koji bi nudio slične usluge kao AUA između KLU-a i zračne luke Beč.
At the same time, the economic situation of KFBG was seriously affected by the outstanding airport charges and the length of the ongoing dispute.
Prestanak pružanja usluga AUA-a značio bi da bi KLU izgubio glavnog zračnog prijevoznika, što bi dovelo do prezaduženosti.
The reports of the supervisory board of KFBG demonstrate that the outstanding airport charges had a very negative impact on the liquidity of KFBG and that as a consequence the shareholders of KFBG were obliged to give KFBG a grant of EUR […].
Na zahtjev Komisije Austrija je izradila detaljnu rekonstruiranu ex ante analizu financijske situacije KFBG-a 20. listopada 2005.
This need for cash is confirmed from the cash flow statements of KFBG of the years 2003-2005.
Tablica 8.
As the legal documents of the proceeding show, there was no possibility for KFBG to request a preliminary injunction against AUA for payment, as the conditions for this legal instrument were not fulfilled in the situation of KFBG.
Rekonstruirana ex ante analiza četiriju scenarija odnosa između KFBG-a i AUA
At the same time, AUA refused to pay the total amount of turnaround fees as it claimed that these turnaround fees were much higher than the turnaround fees Ryanair was paying at the same time at KLU.
Izračun scenarija na osnovi ekstrapolacije 2005.
AUA claimed equal treatment with Ryanair and based its alleged right to equal conditions with Ryanair on several arguments: KLU's obligation to contract and its duty for equal treatment; KLU's abuse of a dominant position and the protection against unfear competition.
Scenarij 1.
Moreover AUA claimed that KLU had violated § 63 Luftfahrtgesetz National Aviation Act, hereinafter ‘LFG’) and § 20 Zivilflugplatz-Betriebsordnung (Civil Airport Operating Regulation, hereinafter ‘ZFBO’).
Uključivanje AUA-a kao punog isplatitelja
According to § 63 LFG civil airports have to be made accessible under the same conditions to all participants of aviation.
Scenarij 2.
According to § 20 ZFBO the airport fees have to be based on objective characteristics.
Potpuno izostavljanje AUA-a
As these legal arguments were prima facie not completely unfounded, KFBG could not be sure that AUA would lose the civil law proceeding at the local district court.
Scenarij 3.
Moreover, as the correspondence between KFBG and AUA in the two legal proceedings demonstrates, AUA threatened KFBG during the proceedings to discontinue serving KLU as an AUA destination.
Uključivanje AUA-a s poticajima
The AUA service between Klagenfurt und the Austrian capital Vienna was and still is the most important air service connection for KLU.
Scenarij 4.
It was therefore essential for KFBG to maintain its regular connection to the AUA hub of Vienna.
AUA u godini postupka
As a consequence of this threat, KFBG searched in 2004 and 2005 for alternative airlines to ensure a flight connection to Vienna in case AUA would indeed stop its services to KLU.
Zarada
As Austria declared, KFBG did not manage to find another alternative airline that would offer similar services as AUA between KLU and Vienna airport.
Godišnja zarada
The discontinuation of the services of AUA would have meant for KLU to lose its main airline which would have led to liabilities exceeding the assets.
Novčani tok
Upon request by the Commission, Austria produced a detailed reconstructed ex ante analysis of the financial situation of KFBG on 20 October 2005.
Novčani tok nakon ulaganja
Table 8
Osnova iz 2005. u tisućama EUR
Reconstructed ex ante analysis of four different scenarios between KFBG and AUA
Odlazni putnici
Calculation of scenarios on basis of extrapolation of 2005
Prihodi od zračnog prijevoza
Scenario 1
Poticaj
Including AUA as full Paying Agent
Vrijednosno usklađenje prihoda AAG-a
Scenario 2
Zrakoplovni prihodi
Complete omission AUA
Ostali prihodi
Scenario 3
Materijalni troškovi
Including AUA with Incentive
Troškovi osoblja
Scenario 4
Amortizacija
Process year AUA
Operativni troškovi
Earnings
Troškovi projekta
Annual earnings
Nadoknade u okviru marketinških partnerstava
Cash Flow
Financijski rezultat
Cash Flow after investments
Godišnji rezultati
Basis 2005 in TEUR
Novčani tok (neto dobit i Afa)
Departing passengers
Potrebna zamjenska ulaganja godišnje u tisućama EUR 1500–2000
Revenues Aviation
Projekt AAG za odredišta Beč i Frankfurt 2005.
Incentive
MTOW (Beč i Frankfurt)
Value adjustment Revenues AAG
Odlazni putnici (Beč i Frankfurt)
Revenues Aeronautical
Povratni letovi
Other revenues
Prihodi projekta
Material expenses
Troškovi projekta/granični troškovi
Personnel expenses
Upravljanje prometom
Depreciation
Ovisno o letovima
Operating expenses
Ovisno o putnicima
Project costs
Ukupni troškovi projekta zaokruženo
Reimbursement Marketing cooperations
Uspjeh projekta zaokruženo
Financial result
Poticaj zaokruženo
Cash flow (Net profit plus Afa)
Austrija je u obzir uzela sljedeća razmatranja.
Necessary replacement investments per year TEUR 1500-2000
U analizi su prikazana četiri različita scenarija i njihovi financijski rezultati za KFBG:
Project AAG Destination Vienna and Frankfurt 2005
scenarij u kojem se i dalje primjenjuje sporazum s AUA-om u okviru kojeg on plaća cjelokupne naknade zračne luke kao i prije listopada 2003. (situacija do koje bi došlo da je AUA nastavio plaćati naknade);
MTOW (Vienna and Frankfurt)
scenarij potpunog prestanka svih AUA-ovih usluga na KLU-u;
Departing passengers (Vienna and Frankfurt)
scenarij u kojem se i dalje primjenjuje sporazum s AUA-om uz primjenu programa poticaja iz 2005. (potpisivanje sporazuma o nagodbi); i
Rotations
scenarij u kojem se i dalje primjenjuje sporazum s AUA-om u okviru kojeg on nastavlja plaćati samo dio važećih naknada zračne luke (situacija do koje bi došlo bez potpisivanja sporazuma o nagodbi).
Project revenues
Komisija napominje da su samo zadnja tri scenarija bila moguće alternative za KFBG u situaciji sudskih sporova s AUA-om, dok je prvi scenarij bio samo teoretske prirode.
Project costs/marginal costs
Međutim, od ta tri scenarija samo se treći scenarij činio razumnom alternativom za subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu u situaciji u kojoj se nalazio KFBG.
Traffic Handling
U četvrtom scenariju, u kojem KFBG ne bi potpisao sporazum o nagodbi te bi AUA nastavio plaćati samo dio naknada zračne luke, financijska situacija KFBG-a i njegova likvidnost još bi se više pogoršali.
Flight dependent
U usporedbi s ostalim scenarijima, četvrti bi scenarij u budućnosti KFBG-a doveo do jasno negativnog novčanog toka.