natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, Annex V to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should be amended accordingly.
Odbor Vijeća sigurnosti Ujedinjenih naroda dodao je 21. srpnja 2017. plovilo Capricorn na popis plovila koja podliježu mjerama ograničavanja.
In order to ensure that the measures provided for in this Regulation are effective, this Regulation should enter into force immediately,
Prilog V. Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Kako bi se osigurala učinkovitost mjera predviđenih u ovoj Uredbi, ova bi Uredba trebala odmah stupiti na snagu,
Annex V to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Članak 1.
Article 2
Prilog V. Uredbi Vijeća (EU) 2016/44 mijenja se kako je utvrđeno u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 4 August 2017.
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
For the Commission,
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 4. kolovoza 2017.
OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p.
Voditelj Službe za instrumente vanjske politike
34.
SL L 206, 1.8.2015., str. 34.
OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p.
SL L 12, 19.1.2016., str. 1.
ANNEX
Prilog V. Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Annex V to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is replaced by the following:
PRILOG V.
ANNEX V
POPIS PLOVILA IZ ČLANKA 1.
LIST OF VESSELS REFERRED TO IN POINT (H) OF ARTICLE 1 AND ARTICLE 15 AND APPLICABLE MEASURES AS SPECIFIED BY THE SANCTIONS COMMITTEE
TOČKE (H) I ČLANKA 15.
Listed pursuant to paragraphs 10(a) and 10 (b) of resolution 2146 (2014), as extended and modified by paragraph 2 of resolution 2362 (2017) (prohibition to load, transport or discharge; prohibition to enter ports).
Dodan na popis u skladu sa stavkom 10. točkama (a) i (b) Rezolucije 2146 (2014), kako je produljena njegova primjena i kako je izmijenjen stavkom 2.
Pursuant to paragraph 11 of resolution 2146, this designation is valid from 21 July to 21 October 2017, unless terminated earlier by the Committee pursuant to paragraph 12 of resolution 2146.
Rezolucije 2362 (2017) (zabrana utovara, prijevoza i ispuštanja; zabrana ulaska u luke).
Flag State: Tanzania.
U skladu sa stavkom 11.
supplementing Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the European Union trade mark and repealing Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96
o dopuni Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 207/2009 o žigu Europske unije i kojom se stavljaju izvan snage uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 2868/95 i (EZ) br. 216/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark [1], and in particular Article 42a, Article 43(3), Article 57a, Article 65a, Article 77(4), Article 78(6), Article 79(5), Article 79b(2), Article 79c(5), Article 80(3), Article 82a(3), Article 93a, Article 136b, Article 154a(3) and Article 156(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 207/2009 od 26. veljače 2009. o žigu Europske unije [1], a posebno njezin članak 42.a, članak 43. stavak 3., članak 57.a, članak 65.a, članak 77. stavak 4., članak 78. stavak 6., članak 79. stavak 5., članak 79.b, stavak 2., članak 79.c stavak 5., članak 80. stavak 3., članak 82.a stavak 3., članak 93.a, članak 136.b, članak 154.a stavak 3. i članak 156. stavak 4.,
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [2], which was codified as Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, created a system specific to the Union for the protection of trade marks to be obtained at the level of the Union on the basis of an application to the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’).
Uredbom Vijeća (EZ) br. 40/94 [2], koja je kodificirana kao Uredba (EZ) br. 207/2009, stvoren je za Europsku uniju specifičan sustav zaštite žigova koji se stječu na razini Unije na temelju prijave koja se podnosi Uredu Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo („Ured”).
Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] amending Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 aligns the powers conferred therein upon the Commission to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Uredbom (EU) 2015/2424 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3] o izmjeni Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 207/2009 usklađuju se ovlasti dodijeljene Komisiji s člancima 290. i 291.
In order to conform with the new legal framework resulting from that alignment, certain rules should be adopted by means of implementing and delegated acts.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske Unije.
The new rules should be applied instead of the existing rules which are laid down in Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 [4] and (EC) No 216/96 [5] and aim at implementing Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Radi prilagodbe novom pravnom okviru proizašlom iz tog usklađivanja, potrebno je provedbenim i delegiranim aktima donijeti određena pravila.
Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96 should therefore be repealed.
Novim pravilima trebala bi se zamijeniti postojeća pravila utvrđena uredbama Komisije (EZ) br. 2868/95 [4] i (EZ) br. 216/96 [5], a kojima je cilj provedba Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
The procedural rules on opposition should ensure an effective, efficient and expeditious examination and registration of EU trade mark applications by the Office using a procedure which is transparent, thorough, fair and equitable.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2868/95 i (EZ) br. 216/96 treba stoga staviti izvan snage.
In order to enhance legal certainty and clarity, those opposition rules should take account of the extended relative grounds for refusal laid down in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, in particular as regards the requirements for admissibility and substantiation of opposition proceedings, and be adjusted to better reflect the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and to codify the practice of the Office.
Pravilima o postupku povodom prigovora trebalo bi se osigurati da Ured učinkovito, djelotvorno i brzo obavlja ispitivanje i registraciju prijava žiga EU-a primjenom transparentnog, podrobnog, pravičnog i ravnopravnog postupka.
In order to allow for a more flexible, consistent and modern trade mark system in the Union, while ensuring legal certainty, it is appropriate to reduce the administrative burden for the parties in inter-partes proceedings by relaxing the requirements for the substantiation of earlier rights in cases where the content of the relevant evidence is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, as well as the requirement of submitting evidence in the language of the proceedings.
U cilju povećanja pravne sigurnosti i jasnoće, tim pravilima o postupku povodom prigovora trebali bi se uzeti u obzir prošireni relativni razlozi za odbijanje propisani u Uredbi (EZ) br. 207/2009, posebno u pogledu zahtjeva za dopuštenost i potkrjepljenje postupaka povodom prigovora, i prilagoditi kako bi se više temeljili na sudskoj praksi Suda Europske unije i radi kodifikacije prakse Ureda.
In the interest of clarity and legal certainty, it is important to specify the requirements for amending an application for an EU trade mark in a clear and exhaustive manner.
Kako bi se omogućilo stvaranje fleksibilnijeg, usklađenijeg i modernijeg sustava žiga u Uniji i istodobno osiguranje pravne sigurnosti, primjereno je smanjiti administrativno opterećenje stranaka u postupku inter partes ublažavanjem zahtjeva za potkrjepljenje ranijih prava u slučajevima ako je sadržaj relevantnih dokaza dostupan na internetu iz izvora kojeg Ured priznaje te zahtjeva za podnošenje dokaza na jeziku postupka.
The procedural rules governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark should ensure that an EU trade mark can be revoked or declared invalid in an effective and efficient way by means of transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedures.
U interesu jasnoće i pravne sigurnosti važno je navesti uvjete za izmjenu prijave žiga EU-a na jasan i iscrpan način.
For the sake of greater clarity, consistency as well as efficiency and legal certainty, the procedural rules governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark should be aligned with those applicable to opposition proceedings, retaining only those differences which are required due to the specific nature of revocation and declaration of invalidity proceedings.
Postupovnim pravilima kojima se uređuje opoziv i proglašavanje ništavosti žiga EU-a trebalo bi se osigurati da se žig EU-a može opozvati ili proglasiti ništavim na djelotvoran i učinkovit način u transparentnom, podrobnom, poštenom i ravnopravnom postupku.
Furthermore, requests for assignment of an EU trade mark registered in the name of an unauthorised agent should follow the same procedural path as invalidity proceedings, serving in practice as an alternative to invalidating the mark.
Za potrebe veće jasnoće, usklađenosti i učinkovitosti te radi pravne sigurnosti, postupovna pravila kojima se uređuje opoziv i proglašavanje ništavosti žiga EU-a trebalo bi uskladiti s pravilima koja se primjenjuju na postupke povodom prigovora i zadržati samo one razlike koje su potrebne zbog posebne prirode postupka opoziva ili proglašavanja ništavosti.
According to settled case-law of the Court of Justice [6], unless otherwise provided, the Office enjoys discretionary powers when examining belated evidence, submitted for the purpose of either substantiating an opposition or proving genuine use of the earlier mark in the context of opposition or invalidity proceedings.
Nadalje, zahtjevi za prijenos žiga EU-a registriranog na ime neovlaštenog zastupnika trebali bi se rješavati u istom postupku kao i postupci za proglašavanje ništavosti koji u praksi služe kao alternativa za poništenje žiga.
In order to ensure legal certainty the relevant boundaries of such discretion should be accurately reflected in the rules governing opposition proceedings or proceedings for the declaration of invalidity of EU trade marks.
U skladu s utvrđenom sudskom praksom Suda EU-a [6], ako nije predviđeno drugačije, Ured ima diskrecijske ovlasti u postupku ispitivanja zakašnjelih dokaza koji su podneseni radi potkrjepljenja prigovora ili radi dokazivanja stvarne uporabe ranijeg žiga u kontekstu postupka povodom prigovora ili postupka za proglašavanje ništavosti.
In order to allow for an effective, efficient and, within the scope of the appeal defined by the parties, complete review of decisions taken by the Office in the first instance by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and impartial appeal procedure suited to the specific nature of intellectual property law and taking into account the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, it is appropriate to reinforce legal certainty and predictability by clarifying and specifying the procedural rules and the parties' procedural guarantees, in particular where a defendant makes use of the right to file a cross appeal.
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost, odgovarajuće granice te diskrecijske ovlasti trebale bi biti točno utvrđene u pravilima koja se primjenjuju na postupak povodom prigovora ili postupak za proglašavanje ništavosti žigova EU-a.
In order to ensure an effective and efficient organisation of the Boards of Appeal, the President, the chairpersons and the members of the Boards of Appeal should, in the exercise of their respective functions conferred upon them by Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and by this Regulation, be required to ensure a high quality and consistency of the decisions taken independently by the Boards on appeal as well as the efficiency of the appeal proceedings.
Kako bi se omogućilo djelotvorno, učinkovito i, unutar opsega žalbe koji su definirale stranke, potpuno preispitivanje odluka koje je donio Ured u prvom stupnju provedbom transparentnog, podrobnog, poštenog i nepristranog žalbenog postupka prilagođenog posebnoj prirodi prava intelektualnog vlasništva te uzimajući u obzir načela iz Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, primjereno je pojačati pravnu sigurnost i predvidljivost pojašnjavanjem i preciziranjem postupovnih pravila i postupovnih jamstava stranaka, posebno ako branjenik iskoristi pravo podnošenja protužalbe.
In order to ensure the independence of the President, the chairpersons and the members of the Boards of Appeal as provided in Article 136 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Management Board should take the latter Article into account when adopting appropriate implementing rules to give effect to the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants in accordance with Article 110 of the Staff Regulations.
Kako bi se osigurala djelotvorna i učinkovita organizacija žalbenih vijeća, od predsjednika, predsjedatelja i članova žalbenih vijeća trebalo bi se tražiti da, pri obavljanju svojih zadaća koje su im dodijeljene Uredbom (EZ) br. 207/2009 i ovom Uredbom, osiguraju visoku kvalitetu i usklađenost odluka koje donose žalbena vijeća i učinkovitost žalbenog postupka.
In order to enhance the transparency and predictability of the appeal proceedings, the rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal currently laid down in Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96, should be set out in a single text and properly interlinked with the procedural rules applicable to the instances of the Office whose decisions are subject to appeals.
U cilju osiguranja neovisnosti predsjednika, predsjedatelja i članova žalbenih vijeća kako je predviđeno u članku 136.
For the sake of clarity and legal certainty, it is required to codify and clarify certain procedural rules governing oral proceedings, in particular relating to the language of such proceedings.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, Upravljački odbor trebao bi uzeti u obzir navedeni članak pri donošenju odgovarajućih provedbenih pravila za primjenu Pravilnika o osoblju za dužnosnike i Uvjeta zaposlenja ostalih službenika Europske unije u skladu s člankom 110.
It is further appropriate to provide greater efficiency and flexibility by introducing the possibility of taking part in oral proceedings by technical means and of substituting the minutes of oral proceedings by their recording.
Pravilnika o osoblju.
In order to further streamline proceedings and render them more consistent, it is appropriate to set out the basic structure and format of evidence to be submitted to the Office in all proceedings, as well as the consequences of not submitting evidence in accordance with that structure and format.
Kako bi se povećala transparentnost i predvidljivost žalbenog postupka, poslovnici žalbenih vijeća koji su trenutačno utvrđeni uredbama (EZ) br. 2868/95 i (EZ) br. 216/96 trebali bi se utvrditi u jednom tekstu i ispravno povezati s pravilima postupka koja se primjenjuju na odjele Ureda protiv čijih se odluka moguće žaliti.
In order to modernise the trade mark system in the Union by adapting it to the internet era, it is further appropriate to provide for a definition of ‘electronic means’ in the context of notifications and for forms of notification that are not obsolete.
Za potrebe jasnoće i pravne sigurnosti, treba kodificirati i pojasniti određena postupovna pravila kojima se uređuju usmeni postupci, posebno u pogledu jezika tih postupaka.
In the interest of efficiency, transparency and user-friendliness, the Office should make available standard forms in all the official languages of the Office for communication in proceedings before the Office, which may be completed online.
Potom je primjereno osigurati veću učinkovitost i fleksibilnost uvođenjem mogućnosti sudjelovanja u usmenom postupku tehničkim sredstvima i zamjenom zapisnika s usmene rasprave snimkom iste.
For the purposes of greater clarity, consistency and efficiency, a provision on the suspension of opposition, revocation, invalidity and appeal proceedings should be introduced, laying down also the maximum duration of a suspension requested by both parties.
U cilju daljnjeg usklađivanja postupaka i povećanja njihove usklađenosti, primjereno je utvrditi osnovnu strukturu i oblik dokaza koji se podnose Uredu u svim postupcima te posljedice njihova nepodnošenja u skladu s tom strukturom i oblikom.
The rules governing the calculation and duration of time limits, the procedures for the revocation of a decision or for cancellation of an entry in the Register, the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings, and the details on representation before the Office need to ensure a smooth, effective and efficient operation of the EU trade mark system.
U cilju modernizacije sustava žiga u Uniji njegovom prilagodbom dobu interneta, primjereno je predvidjeti definiciju „elektroničkih sredstava” u kontekstu obavijesti te oblike obavješćivanja koji nisu zastarjeli.
It is necessary to ensure the effective and efficient registration of international trade marks in a manner that is fully consistent with the rules of the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks.
U interesu učinkovitosti, transparentnosti i jednostavnosti, Ured bi trebalo staviti na raspolaganje standardne obrasce na svim službenim jezicima Ureda za komunikaciju u postupcima pred Uredom koji se mogu popuniti na internetu.
It is therefore necessary to defer the applicability of those rules until the same date.
Pravilima kojima se uređuju izračunavanje i trajanje rokova, postupci za opoziv odluke ili za brisanje unosa iz registra, detaljni mehanizmi za nastavak postupka i pojedinosti o zastupanju pred Uredom mora se osigurati nesmetan, djelotvoran i učinkovit rad sustava žiga EU-a.
Notwithstanding the repeal of Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96, it is necessary to continue to apply specific provisions of those Regulations to certain proceedings that had been initiated before the abovementioned date until the conclusion of those proceedings,
Nužno je osigurati djelotvornu i učinkovitu registraciju međunarodnih žigova na način koji je potpuno u skladu s pravilima iz Protokola koji se odnosi na Madridski sporazum o međunarodnoj registraciji žigova.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ne dovodeći u pitanje stavljanje izvan snage uredaba (EZ) br. 2868/95 i (EZ) br. 216/96, nužno je nastaviti primjenjivati specifične odredbe tih uredaba na određene postupke započete prije gore navedenog datuma do njihova okončanja,
GENERAL PROVISIONS
GLAVA I.
Article 1
OPĆE ODREDBE
Subject matter
Članak 1.
This Regulation lays down rules specifying:
Sadržaj
the details of the procedure for filing and examining an opposition to the registration of an EU trade mark at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’);
Ovom se Uredbom propisuju pravila kojima se određuje sljedeće:
the details of the procedure governing the amendment of an application for an EU trade mark;
pojedinosti postupka za podnošenje i ispitivanje prigovora na registraciju žiga EU-a pri Uredu Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo („Ured”);
the details governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark, as well as the transfer of an EU trade mark registered in the name of an unauthorised agent;
pojedinosti o postupku izmjene prijave žiga EU-a;
the formal content of a notice of appeal and the procedure for the filing and the examination of an appeal, the formal content and form of the Boards of Appeal's decisions and the reimbursement of the appeal fee, the details concerning the organisation of the Boards of Appeal, and the conditions under which decisions on appeals are to be taken by a single member;
pojedinosti o postupku opoziva i proglašavanja ništavosti žiga EU-a te o prijenosu žiga EU-a registriranog na ime neovlaštenog zastupnika;
the detailed arrangements for oral proceedings and for the taking of evidence;
formalni sadržaj žalbe i postupak za podnošenje i ispitivanje žalbe, formalni sadržaj i oblik odluka žalbenog vijeća te povrat pristojbe za podnošenje žalbe, pojedinosti o ustrojstvu žalbenih vijeća i uvjeti pod kojima odluke o žalbi donosi jedan član;
the detailed arrangements for notification by the Office and the rules on the means of communication with the Office;
detaljna pravila za usmene postupke i izvođenje dokaza;
the details regarding the calculation and duration of time limits;
detaljna pravila za obavješćivanje Ureda i pravila o sredstvima za komunikaciju s Uredom;
the procedure for the revocation of a decision or for the cancellation of an entry in the Register of EU trade marks;
pojedinosti o izračunu i trajanju rokova;
the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings before the Office;
postupak za opoziv odluke ili za brisanje upisa iz registra žigova EU-a;
the conditions and the procedure for the appointment of a common representative, the conditions under which employees and professional representatives shall file an authorisation, and the content of that authorisation, and the circumstances in which a person may be removed from the list of admitted professional representatives;
detaljna pravila o nastavku postupka pred Uredom;
the details of the procedure concerning international registrations based on a basic application or basic registration relating to a collective mark, certification mark or guarantee mark, and the procedure for the filing and examination of an opposition to an international registration.
uvjeti za imenovanje zajedničkog predstavnika i postupak njegova imenovanja, uvjeti pod kojima zaposlenici i ovlašteni zastupnici podnose ovlaštenje i sadržaj tog ovlaštenja te okolnosti pod kojima se osoba može ukloniti s popisa prihvaćenih ovlaštenih zastupnika;
TITLE II
pojedinosti postupka za međunarodne registracije na temelju osnovne prijave ili osnovne registracije zajedničkog žiga, certifikacijskog ili jamstvenog žiga i postupka za podnošenje i ispitivanje prigovora na međunarodnu registraciju.
PROCEDURE FOR OPPOSITION AND PROOF OF USE
GLAVA II.
Article 2
POSTUPAK POVODOM PRIGOVORA I DOKAZ O UPORABI
Notice of opposition
Članak 2.
A notice of opposition may be entered on the basis of one or more earlier marks or other rights within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, provided that the proprietors or authorised persons entering the notice pursuant to Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 are entitled to do so for all the earlier marks or rights.
Obavijest o prigovoru
Where an earlier mark has more than one proprietor (co-ownership) or where an earlier right may be exercised by more than one person, an opposition pursuant to Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 may be filed by any or all of the proprietors or authorised persons.
Obavijest o prigovoru može se podnijeti na temelju jednog ili više ranijih žigova ili drugih prava u smislu članka 8.
The notice of opposition shall contain:
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 pod uvjetom da nositelji ili ovlaštene osobe koji podnose prigovor u skladu s člankom 41.
the file number of the application against which opposition is entered and the name of the applicant for the EU trade mark;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 imaju ovlasti to učiniti za sve ranije žigove ili prava.
a clear identification of the earlier mark or right on which the opposition is based, namely:
Ako raniji žig ima više nositelja (suvlasnici) ili ako ranije pravo može ostvarivati više osoba, prigovor u skladu s člankom 41.
where the opposition is based on an earlier mark within the meaning of Article 8(2)(a) or (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the file number or registration number of the earlier mark, an indication of whether the earlier mark is registered or an application for registration of that mark, as well as an indication of the Member States including, where applicable, the Benelux, in or for which the earlier mark is protected, or, if applicable, the indication that it is an EU trade mark;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 mogu podnijeti bilo koji ili svi nositelji ili ovlaštene osobe.
where the opposition is based on a well-known mark within the meaning of Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the indication of the Member State(s) where the mark is well-known and a representation of the mark;
Obavijest o prigovoru sadržava sljedeće: