natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 of 23 July 1992 on licensing of air carriers (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1), Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8), and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 of 23 July 1992 on fares and rates for air services (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 15).
Danska je odgovorila dopisom od 28. ožujka 2011.
This is without prejudice to any amendment or replacement of the 1999 agreements or any other supplementary agreement concluded between Ryanair directly or any other entity controlled by Ryanair and the manager of Aarhus airport.
Dopisom od 8. travnja 2011.
By letter dated 25 March 2011, the Commission requested further information.
Komisija je od Ryanaira zatražila dodatne informacije.
Denmark responded by letter dated 28 March 2011.
Ryanair je odgovorio dopisom od 15. srpnja 2011.
By letter dated 8 April 2011, the Commission requested Ryanair to provide further information.
Zapažanja Ryanaira proslijeđena su Danskoj dopisom od 5. kolovoza 2011.
Ryanair responded by letter dated 15 July 2011.
Danska je dostavila dodatne informacije u dopisima od 8. rujna 2011. i 22. rujna 2011. te 12. travnja 2012. i 22. svibnja 2012.
Ryanair's observations were forwarded to Denmark by letter dated 5 August 2011.
Odluka o pokretanju postupka odnosi se na ugovore sklopljene 1999. između Ryanaira i Zračne luke Aarhus.
Additional information was provided by Denmark by letters dated 8 September 2011 and 22 September 2011, 12 April 2012 and 22 May 2012.
Ova odluka, dakle, ne dovodi u pitanje bilo koje izmjene ili zamjenu ugovora iz 1999. ili bilo koji dopunski ugovor sklopljen nakon toga.
The opening decision relates to the agreements concluded between Ryanair and Aarhus airport in 1999.
Danska pojašnjava da su prema Zračnoj luci Aarhus preliminarni pregovori između Zračne luke Aarhus i Ryanaira počeli već početkom 1998.
This decision is thus without prejudice to any amendment or replacement of the 1999 agreements or any complementary agreement concluded thereafter.
Danska nadalje navodi da su ti pregovori privremeno prekinuti u proljeće 1999., jer stranke nisu mogle postići dogovor.
Denmark clarifies that according to Aarhus airport the preliminary negotiations between Aarhus airport and Ryanair started already at the beginning of 1998.
Danska dalje navodi da je u lipnju 1999.
Denmark clarifies further that these negotiations were temporarily suspended in spring 1999, because the parties could not reach an agreement.
SAS najavio zatvaranje dionice Aarhus-London do kojeg će doći krajem listopada 1999.
Denmark further states that in June 1999 SAS announced that it would close the Aarhus-London route with effect from the end of October 1999.
U tom smislu, Danska ističe da su tijekom ljeta 1999. pregovori između Ryanaira i Zračne luke Aarhus, koju zastupa ravnatelj nadležan za komunalno partnerstvo, nastavljeni.
In this regard, Denmark points out that in the course of summer 1999 negotiations between Ryanair and Aarhus airport, represented by its director responsible for utility partnership, resumed.
Prema tome, Danska je mišljenja da ni dioničari zračne luke, ni tijela za civilno zrakoplovstvo nisu bili izravno ili neizravno uključeni u pregovore o ugovorima s Ryanairom iz 1999.
Consequently, Denmark is of the opinion that neither the shareholders of the airport, nor the civil aviation authorities were directly or indirectly involved in the negotiations of the 1999 Ryanair agreements.
Danska stoga smatra da se ti ugovori ne mogu pripisati toj državi članici.
Decision (EU) 2018/546 of the European Central Bank
Odluka (EU) 2018/546 Europske središnje banke
of 15 March 2018
od 15. ožujka 2018.
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, and in particular Article 26(3) and Articles 28, 29, 77 and 78 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 575/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 26. lipnja 2013. o bonitetnim zahtjevima za kreditne institucije i investicijska društva i o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012, a posebno njezin članak 26. stavak 3., i članke 28., 29., 77. i 78.,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions, and in particular Article 4(1)(d) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća (EU) br. 1024/2013 od 15. listopada 2013. o dodjeli određenih zadaća Europskoj središnjoj banci u vezi s politikama bonitetnog nadzora kreditnih institucija, a posebno njezin članak 4. stavak 1. točku (d),
Having regard to Decision (EU) 2017/933 of the European Central Bank of 16 November 2016 on a general framework for delegating decision-making powers for legal instruments related to supervisory tasks (ECB/2016/40), and in particular Article 4 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Odluku (EU) 2017/933 Europske središnje banke od 16. studenoga 2016. o općem okviru za prenošenje ovlasti za donošenje odluka za pravne instrumente povezane s nadzornim zadaćama (ESB/2016/40), a posebno njezin članak 4.,
Pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, the European Central Bank (ECB), as the competent authority for significant supervised entities, is responsible for evaluating whether issuances of Common Equity Tier 1 instruments meet the criteria set out in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
U skladu s člankom 4. stavkom 1. točkom (d) Uredbe (EU) br. 1024/2013, Europska središnja banka (ESB), kao tijelo nadležno za značajne nadzirane subjekte, odgovorna je za ocjenjivanje ispunjavaju li izdanja instrumenata redovnog osnovnog kapitala kriterije navedene u Uredbi (EU) br. 575/2013.
The inclusion of a type of instrument in the EBA list implies that it meets the eligibility criteria set out in Article 28 or, where applicable, Article 29 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013.
According to recital 75 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, that Regulation does not prevent competent authorities from maintaining prior permission processes regarding the contracts governing Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments.
Kada ESB ocjenjuje zahtjeve značajnih nadziranih subjekata za donošenje prethodnog odobrenja za smanjenje regulatornog kapitala, primjenjuje članak 78.
Accordingly, the laws of some Member States establish such processes for the classification of capital instruments as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments.
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 i odjeljak 2. poglavlja IV.
The ECB is the competent authority to grant such permission to significant supervised entities pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 241/2014.
The ECB is also responsible, pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, for granting prior permission to significant supervised entities to reduce, redeem or repurchase Common Equity Tier 1 instruments issued by them in a manner that is permitted under national law and to effect the call, redemption, repayment or repurchase of Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments, prior to the date of their maturity.
Od ESB-a kao nadležnog tijela svake godine se zahtijeva donošenje značajnog broja odluka o regulatornom kapitalu.
When the ECB assesses requests from significant supervised entities for prior permission to reduce own funds, it applies Article 78 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Section 2 of Chapter IV of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 241/2014.
Radi olakšavanja postupka donošenja odluka, potrebna je odluka o prenošenju ovlasti u odnosu na donošenje takvih odluka.
The ECB, as the competent authority, is required to adopt a substantial number of own funds decisions each year.
Sud Europske unije prepoznao je da je prenošenje ovlasti neophodno radi omogućavanja instituciji od koje se zahtijeva donošenje značajnog broja odluka da obavlja svoje dužnosti.
To facilitate the decision-making process a delegation decision is necessary in relation to the adoption of such decisions.
Slično tomu, Sud Europske unije prepoznao je potrebu osiguravanja da tijela nadležna za donošenje odluka mogu djelovati po načelu svojstvenom svim institucionalnim sustavima.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has recognised delegation of authority to be necessary to enable an institution required to adopt a considerable number of decisions to perform its duties.
Prenošenje ovlasti za donošenje odluka trebalo bi biti ograničeno i razmjerno, a opseg prenošenja treba biti jasno utvrđen.
Similarly, it has recognised the need to ensure that decision-making bodies are able to function as a principle inherent to all institutional systems.
Odluka (EU) 2017/933 (ESB/2016/40) utvrđuje postupak koji je potrebno poštovati za donošenje odluka o prenošenju ovlasti u vezi s nadzorom i osobe kojima se mogu prenijeti ovlasti za donošenje odluka.
Delegation of decision-making powers should be limited and proportionate, and the scope of the delegation should be clearly defined.
Ta odluka ne utječe na izvršavanje ESB-ovih nadzornih zadaća i bez utjecaja je na nadležnost Nadzornog odbora za predlaganje potpunih nacrta odluka Upravnom vijeću.
Decision (EU) 2017/933 (ECB/2016/40) specifies the procedure to be followed for adopting delegation decisions concerning supervision and the persons who may be delegated decision-making powers.
Kada nisu ispunjeni kriteriji za donošenje delegirane odluke, kako su utvrđeni u ovoj Odluci, odluke je potrebno donijeti u skladu s postupkom neisticanja prigovora iz članka 26. stavka 8.
That Decision does not affect the ECB's exercise of its supervisory tasks and is without prejudice to the Supervisory Board's competence to propose complete draft decisions to the Governing Council.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1024/2013 i člankom 13.g Odluke ESB/2004/2.
Where the criteria for the adoption of a delegated decision, as laid down in this Decision, are not met, decisions should be adopted in accordance with the non-objection procedure set out in Article 26(8) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Article 13g of Decision ECB/2004/2.
Nadalje, ako voditelji radnih jedinica imaju nedoumica o tome jesu li ispunjeni kriteriji procjene za oduke o regulatornom kapitalu zbog nedovoljnih informacija koje je dostavilo nacionalno nadležno tijelo ili zbog složenosti procjene, trebalo bi također koristiti postupak neisticanja prigovora.
Furthermore, if the heads of work units have concerns regarding the fulfilment of assessment criteria for own funds decisions due to insufficient information being provided by the significant supervised entity or the complexity of the assessment, the non-objection procedure should also be used.
Nadzorne odluke ESB-a mogu biti podvrgnute administrativnom preispitivanju u skladu s člankom 24.
ECB supervisory decisions may be subject to administrative review pursuant to Article 24 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and as further specified in Decision ECB/2014/16.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1024/2013, a kako je dalje utvrđeno Odlukom ESB/2014/16.
‘own funds reduction’ means any action referred to in Article 77 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
„smanjenje regulatornog kapitala” znači svaka radnja određena u članku 77.
‘reductions with replacement’ means own funds reductions as referred to in Article 78(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘reductions without replacement’ means own funds reductions as referred to in Article 78(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
„smanjenja sa zamjenom” znači smanjenje regulatornog kapitala kako je navedeno u članku 78. stavku 1. točki (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘EBA list’ means a list established, maintained and published by the EBA pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, containing all the forms of capital instruments in each Member State that qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 instruments on the basis of information from each competent authority;
„smanjenja bez zamjene” znači smanjenje regulatornog kapitala kako je navedeno u članku 78. stavku 1. točki (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘Common Equity Tier 1 instrument’, ‘Additional Tier 1 instrument’ and ‘Tier 2 instrument’ mean a capital instrument which qualifies as Common Equity Tier 1 instrument, Additional Tier 1 instrument or Tier 2 instrument, respectively, under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
„popis EBA-e” znači popis koji EBA uspostavlja, vodi i objavljuje u skladu s trećim podstavkom članka 26. stavka 3.
‘replacing instrument’ means the capital instrument which replaces the capital instrument to be reduced, repurchased, called or redeemed within the meaning of Article 78(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013, koji sadržava sve oblike instrumenata kapitala u svakoj državi članici koji ispunjavaju uvjete za instrumente redovnoga osnovnoga kapitala na temelju informacija od svakog nadležnog tijela;
‘replaced instrument’ means the capital instrument to be subject to an action referred to in Article 77 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and replaced by a replacing instrument in a reduction with replacement pursuant to Article 78(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
„instrument redovnog osnovnog kapitala”, „instrument dodatnog osnovnog kapitala” i „instrument dopunskog kapitala” znači instrument kapitala koji ispunjava uvjete za instrument redovnog osnovnog kapitala, instrument dodatnog osnovnog kapitala odnosno instrument dopunskog kapitala, u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio’, ‘Tier 1 capital ratio’ and ‘total capital ratio’ mean Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio and total capital ratio, respectively, as referred to in Article 92(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
„zamjenski instrument” znači instrument kapitala koji zamjenjuje instrument kapitala koji se treba smanjiti, ponovno kupiti, otkupiti ili se treba izvršiti opcija kupnje tog instrumenta u smislu članka 78. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘SREP decision’ means the decision adopted by the ECB on the basis of Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 following the annual supervisory review and evaluation process within the meaning of Article 97 of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and which establishes prudential requirements;
„zamijenjeni instrument” znači instrument kapitala u odnosu na koji se provodi radnja navedena u članku 77.
‘delegation decision’ and ‘delegated decision’ have the same meaning as in point (2) and point (4) of Article 3 of Decision (EU) 2017/933 (ECB/2016/40), respectively;
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 i koji je zamijenjen zamjenskim instrumentom kod smanjenja sa zamjenom u skladu s člankom 78. stavkom 1. točkom (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘heads of work units’ means the heads of work units of the ECB to whom the power to adopt own funds decisions is delegated;
„stopa redovnog osnovnog kapitala”, „stopa osnovnog kapitala” i „stopa ukupnog kapitala” znači stopa redovnog osnovnog kapitala, stopa osnovnog kapitala odnosno stopa ukupnog kapitala kako su navedene u članku 92. stavku 2.
‘non-objection procedure’ means the procedure set out in Article 26(8) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and further specified in Article 13g of Decision ECB/2004/2;
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013;
‘negative decision’ means a decision that does not or does not fully grant the permission as requested by the significant supervised entity.
„odluka donesena na temelju SREP-a” znači odluka donesena na temelju članka 16.
A decision with ancillary provisions such as conditions or obligations shall be considered as a negative decision unless such ancillary provisions (a) ensure that the supervised entity fulfils the requirements of relevant Union law referred to in Articles 3(4), 4(3) and 5(6) and have been agreed in writing or (b) merely restate one or more of the existing requirements that the institution has to comply with pursuant to provisions referred to in Articles 3(4), 4(3) and 5(6) or require information on the fulfilment of one or more of such requirements;
Uredbe (EU) br. 1024/2013 nakon godišnjeg postupka nadzorne provjere i ocjene u smislu članka 97.
‘significant supervised entity’ means a significant supervised entity as defined in point (16) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2014/17).
Direktive 2013/36/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, a koja utvrđuje bonitetne zahtjeve;
Article 2
„odluka o prenošenju ovlasti” i „delegirana odluka” imaju isto značenje kao u članku 3. točkama 2. odnosno 4.
Delegation of own funds decisions
Odluke (EU) 2017/933 (ESB/2016/40);
In accordance with Article 4 of Decision (EU) 2017/933 (ECB/2016/40), the Governing Council hereby delegates the adoption of decisions on (a) prior permission for the classification of capital instruments as Common Equity Tier 1 instruments under Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; (b) prior permission for the classification of capital instruments as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments, where required by national law; and (c) prior permission for own funds reductions under Article 77 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, to the heads of work units nominated by the Executive Board in accordance with Article 5 of that Decision.
„voditelji radnih jedinica” znači voditelji radnih jedinica ESB-a kojima je prenesena ovlast za donošenje odluka o regulatornom kapitalu;
The own funds decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted by means of a delegated decision if the criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions, as set out in Articles 3, 4 and 5, are fulfilled.
„postupak nepodnošenja prigovora” znači postupak utvrđen člankom 26. stavkom 8.
Own funds decisions shall not be adopted by means of a delegated decision if insufficient information or the complexity of assessment require that they are adopted under the non-objection procedure.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1024/2013 i dalje razrađen u članku 13.g Odluke ESB/2004/2;
Article 3
„negativna odluka” znači odluka kojom se ne daje odobrenje koje zahtijeva značajni nadzirani subjekt ili kojom se to odobrenje ne daje u potpunosti.
Criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on prior permission to classify instruments as Common Equity Tier 1 instruments
Odluka s dodatnim odredbama kao što su uvjeti ili obveze smatra se negativnom odlukom osim ako se tim dodatnim odredbama (a) osigurava da nadzirani subjekt ispunjava zahtjeve mjerodavnog prava Unije navedenog u članku 3. stavku 4., članku 4. stavku 3. i članku 5. stavku 6., a koji su dogovoreni u pisanom obliku, ili (b) samo potvrđuje jedan ili više zahtjeva koje institucija mora ispuniti u skladu s odredbama navedenim u članku 3. stavku 4., članku 4. stavku 3. i članku 5. stavku 6. ili se zahtijevaju informacije o ispunjavanju jednog ili više takvih uvjeta;
Decisions on the classification of capital instruments as Common Equity Tier 1 instruments shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if the type of instruments in respect of which prior permission is sought has been included, at the time the application was received by the ECB, in the EBA list.
„značajni nadzirani subjekt” znači značajni nadzirani subjekt kako je definiran u članku 2. točki 16.
Negative decisions and decisions pursuant to Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall not be adopted by means of a delegated decision.
Uredbe (EU) br. 468/2014 Europske središnje banke (ESB/2014/17).
Where, pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2, a decision on the classification of capital instruments as Common Equity Tier 1 instruments cannot be adopted by means of a delegated decision, it shall be adopted in accordance with the non-objection procedure.
Članak 2.
The assessment on the classification of capital instruments as Common Equity Tier 1 instruments shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 27, 28 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Articles 4 to 11 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 241/2014.
Prenošenje odluka o regulatornom kapitalu
Article 4
U skladu s člankom 4.
Criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on prior permission to classify instruments as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments
Odluke (EU) 2017/933 (ESB/2016/40), Upravno vijeće ovime prenosi ovlast za donošenje odluka o (a) prethodnom odobrenju za raspoređivanje instrumenata kapitala kao instrumenata redovnog osnovnog kapitala prema članku 26. stavku 3.
Where prior permission is required under national law, decisions on prior permission to classify capital instruments as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments shall be taken by means of a delegated decision.
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013; (b) prethodnom odobrenju za raspoređivanje instrumenata kapitala kao instrumenata dodatnog osnovnog kapitala i dopunskog kapitala kada se to zahtijeva na temelju nacionalnog prava; i (c) prethodnom odobrenju za smanjenje regulatornog kapitala prema članku 77.
Negative decisions shall not be adopted by means of a delegated decision and shall be adopted in accordance with the non-objection procedure.
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013, voditeljima radnih jedinica koje je imenovao Izvršni odbor u skladu s člankom 5. te odluke.
The assessment on the classification of instruments as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 52 to 54 and 63 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Articles 8, 9 and 20 to 24a of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 241/2014.
Odluke o regulatornom kapitalu navedene u stavku 1. donose se putem delegirane odluke samo ako su ispunjeni kriteriji za donošenje delegirane odluke, kako su navedeni u člancima 3., 4. i 5.
Article 5
Odluke o regulatornom kapitalu se ne donose putem delegirane odluke ako se zbog nedovoljnih informacija ili složenosti procjene zahtijeva da se donose temeljem postupka neisticanja prigovora.
Criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on prior permission for own funds reductions
Članak 3.
Decisions on prior permission for own funds reductions shall be taken by means of a delegated decision where the conditions of either paragraph 2 or 3 are fulfilled.
Kriteriji za donošenje delegiranih odluka o prethodnom odobrenju za raspoređivanje instrumenata kao instrumenata redovnog osnovnog kapitala
For reductions with replacement, decisions shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if:
Odluke o raspoređivanju instrumenata kapitala kao instrumenata redovnog osnovnog kapitala donose se putem delegiranih odluka ako je vrsta instrumenata u odnosu na koje se zahtijeva prethodno odobrenje, u vrijeme kada je ESB zaprimio zahtjev, bila navedena u popisu EBA-e.
the replacing instrument is a Common Equity Tier 1 instrument with an aggregate nominal amount at least equal to the nominal amount of the replaced instrument; or
Negativne odluke i odluke u skladu s člankom 31.
the replacing instrument is an Additional Tier 1 instrument with an aggregate nominal amount at least equal to the nominal amount of the replaced instrument, if the replaced instrument is an Additional Tier 1 instrument; or
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 ne donose se putem delegiranih odluka.
the replacing instrument is an Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instrument with an aggregate nominal amount at least equal to the nominal amount of the replaced instrument, if the replaced instrument is a Tier 2 instrument.
Ako se, sukladno stavcima 1. i 2., odluka o raspoređivanju instrumenata regulatornog kapitala ne može donijeti putem delegirane odluke, donosi se u skladu s postupkom neisticanja prigovora.
For reductions without replacement, decisions shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if:
Procjena raspoređivanja instrumenata kapitala kao instrumenata redovnog osnovnog kapitala donosi se u skladu s člancima 27., 28. i 29.