natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Dons’ as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) sent by Denmark, and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union.
budući da:
The Commission deemed all three objections admissible according to Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013 Komisija je ispitala zahtjev za registraciju naziva „Dons” kao zaštićene oznake izvornosti (ZOI) koji je podnijela Danska te ga objavila u Službenom listu Europske unije.
By letter dated 24 May 2016, the Commission forwarded these objections to the Danish authorities and invited them to file their related observations within two months, in line with Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009.
Dopisom od 24. svibnja 2016.
Denmark sent its observations within the required deadline, on 4 July 2016.
Komisija je proslijedila te primjedbe danskim nadležnim tijelima i pozvala ih da svoja povezana očitovanja podnesu u roku od dva mjeseca u skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 1.
As provided for in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009, the Commission communicated the observations from the Danish authorities by letters of 12 January 2017 to the three objectors, and they were given two months for possible comments.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 607/2009.
In reply, the Commission received another communication from the Italian Ministry of Agriculture on 10 March 2017, reiterating its opposition.
Danska je 4. srpnja 2016. poslala svoja očitovanja u traženom roku.
In accordance with Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009, the Commission should take a decision on the basis of the evidence available to it.
U skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 1.
All three objectors claim that certain vine varieties used for the production of ‘Dons’, namely ‘Cabernet Cortis’, ‘Orion’, ‘Regent’, ‘Rondo’ and ‘Solaris’, which they consider to be hybrids obtained from cross-breeding of the species Vitis vinifera with other species of the genus Vitis, should not be used for the production of a Protected Designation of Origin according to Article 93(1)(a)(iv) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 607/2009 Komisija je trima podnositeljima prigovora dostavila navedena očitovanja danskih nadležnih tijela u dopisima od 12. siječnja 2017. te za dostavljanje eventualnih primjedbi odredila rok od dva mjeseca.
They also claim that in no case a variety obtained from an interspecies cross could be considered as belonging to the species Vitis vinifera.
Komisija je 10. ožujka 2017. kao odgovor primila dopis talijanskog ministarstva poljoprivrede u kojem je ministarstvo ponovno izrazilo svoje protivljenje.
According to the Italian Ministry of Agriculture and FEDERDOC, in any country of the European Union, the examination of the genome makes it possible to determine whether a variety belongs to the species Vitis vinifera or a cross with another species of the genus Vitis.
U skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 3.
The Italian Ministry of Agriculture additionally claims that the reference to human factors is insufficient, as is the causal link between natural and human factors, and information on the quality and characteristics of the product attributable to the geographical environment.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 607/2009 Komisija bi trebala donijeti odluku na temelju dokaza koji su joj dostupni.
Moreover, this objector claims that the assertion that the acidity profile of the product is attributable to the ‘selection of relatively hardy varieties’ is devoid of any technical and scientific basis, taking into account that the selection of varieties is a long-term process which cannot refer to interspecies hybrid varieties.
Sva tri podnositelja prigovora tvrde da određene sorte vinove loze koje se upotrebljavaju za proizvodnju vina „Dons”, odnosno „Cabernet Cortis”, „Orion”, „Regent”, „Rondo” i „Solaris”, koje oni smatraju hibridima dobivenima križanjem vrste Vitis vinifera s drugim vrstama roda Vitis, ne bi trebalo upotrebljavati za proizvodnju zaštićene oznake izvornosti u skladu s člankom 93. stavkom 1. točkom (a) podtočkom iv.
Lastly, the Italian Ministry of Agriculture considers that it is superfluous to state the requirements about the labelling of grape varieties and the vintage year, as such requirements are laid down in Articles 61 and 62 of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013.
The Commission has assessed the arguments and evidence provided by the objectors and the applicant, and concluded that the name ‘Dons’ should be registered as Protected Designation of Origin for the following reasons.
Tvrde i da se sorta dobivena križanjem među vrstama ne može nikako smatrati da pripada vrsti Vitis vinifera.
As regards the allegations that the product is not obtained from vine varieties belonging to Vitis vinifera, several elements have to be taken into account.
Talijansko ministarstvo poljoprivrede i FEDERDOC smatraju da je u svim zemljama Europske unije ispitivanjem genoma moguće utvrditi pripada li sorta vrsti Vitis vinifera ili križanju s drugom vrstom roda Vitis.
Firstly, there is no harmonised classification of a vine variety belonging to Vitis vinifera at EU level.
Nadalje talijansko ministarstvo poljoprivrede tvrdi da su upućivanje na ljudske čimbenike, uzročna povezanost između prirodnih i ljudskih čimbenika te informacije o kvaliteti i svojstvima proizvoda koji se pripisuju zemljopisnom okruženju nedostatni.
In addition, there is no reference list or scientific document available from any official competent body, such as the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV), which currently would allow to undisputedly categorize Vitis vinifera species or a cross between the Vitis vinifera species and other species of the genus Vitis, or to distinguish between them.
K tome, navedeni podnositelj prigovora smatra da tvrdnja prema kojoj se profil kiselosti proizvoda može pripisati „izboru relativno otpornih sorti” nema nikakve tehničke ni znanstvene osnove, uzimajući u obzir to da je izbor sorti dugotrajan proces koji se ne može odnositi na hibridne sorte među vrstama.
Against this background, the issue of scientific definition should primarily be addressed in the preliminary national assessment conducted by the Member States in accordance with Article 96 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Naposljetku, talijansko ministarstvo poljoprivrede smatra da je suvišno navoditi zahtjeve u pogledu označivanja sorti vinove loze i godine berbe jer su ti zahtjevi utvrđeni u člancima 61. i 62.
Denmark relies on the German classification where all five wine grape varieties in question are classified as belonging to Vitis vinifera.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 607/2009.
Secondly, pursuant to Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 regarding the Scrutiny of an objection, the Commission shall take any decision to reject or register the designation of origin on the basis of the evidence available to it.
Komisija je procijenila argumente i dokaze koje su dostavili podnositelji prigovora i podnositelj zahtjeva te je zaključila da bi se naziv „Dons” trebao registrirati kao zaštićena oznaka izvornosti iz razloga navedenih u nastavku.
In the case at hand the objectors did not provide any solid scientific evidence or data proving that the product is not obtained from vine varieties belonging to Vitis vinifera.
Kada je riječ o navodima da proizvod nije nastao od sorti vinove loze koje pripadaju vrsti Vitis vinifera potrebno je uzeti u obzir nekoliko elemenata.
Lastly, the Commission notes that several other Member States use the wine grape varieties in question in the production of their wines with Protected Designation of Origin.
Prvo, na razini EU-a nema usklađenog razvrstavanja sorti vinove loze koje pripadaju vrsti Vitis vinifera.
For the above reasons, it is not possible to conclude that the product referred to by the name ‘Dons’ is obtained from vine varieties not belonging to Vitis vinifera.
Osim toga, ne postoji referentni popis ili znanstveni dokument koji je izdalo službeno nadležno tijelo, kao što je Međunarodna organizacija za vinovu lozu i vino (OIV), na temelju kojih bi se sada mogla neosporno kategorizirati vrsta Vitis vinifera ili križanje vrste Vitis vinifera i drugih vrsta roda Vitis, ili utvrditi razlika među njima.
The objections made on that ground therefore have to be rejected.
U tom bi kontekstu pitanje znanstvene definicije trebalo prije svega obraditi u okviru preliminarne nacionalne procjene koju provode države članice u skladu s člankom 96.
As regards the alleged missing information on the link, the Commission observes that a description of the relevant natural factors present in the geographical environment has been provided, as well as their link to the specific quality and characteristics of the product, expressed notably in a higher lactic acidity of the product distinguishing it from classical sparkling wines.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013.
It is, therefore, to conclude that the necessary elements of the link have been included in line with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 607/2009.
Danska se oslanja na njemačko razvrstavanje prema kojemu se smatra da svih pet predmetnih sorti vinove loze pripada vrsti Vitis vinifera.
As for the human factors, the acidity profile of the product is deemed attributable to the selection of relatively hardy varieties in line with Article 93(1)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Drugo, u skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 3.
As regards the allegations that it is superfluous to state the requirements which are prescribed by the Regulation, since parts of the requirements go beyond the Union law, their inclusion seems appropriate for the reasons of clarity and correct understanding of the requirements by potentially eligible producers.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 607/2009 u pogledu ocjene prigovora Komisija donosi svaku odluku o odbijanju ili registraciji oznake izvornosti na temelju dokaza koji su joj dostupni.
In the light of the above and in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission considers that the application meets the conditions laid down in that Regulation and that the name ‘Dons’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.
U predmetnom slučaju podnositelji prigovora nisu dostavili nikakve čvrste znanstvene dokaze ili podatke kojima se dokazuje da se proizvod ne dobiva od sorti vinove loze koje pripadaju vrsti Vitis vinifera.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,
Naposljetku, Komisija napominje da nekoliko drugih država članica upotrebljava predmetne sorte vinove loze u proizvodnji vina sa zaštićenom oznakom izvornosti.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Zbog prethodno navedenih razloga nije moguće zaključiti da se proizvod koji se naziva „Dons” dobiva od sorti vinove loze koje ne pripadaju vrsti Vitis vinifera.
Article 1
Stoga se primjedbe utemeljene na tim razlozima moraju odbiti.
The name ‘Dons’ (PDO) is hereby protected.
Kada je riječ o navodnom nedostatku informacija o povezanosti, Komisija smatra da je prisutan opis relevantnih prirodnih čimbenika prisutnih u zemljopisnom okruženju, njihove povezanosti s posebnom kvalitetom i svojstvima proizvoda, koja su posebno izražena u većem udjelu mliječne kiseline u proizvodu po čemu se razlikuje od klasičnih pjenušavih vina.
Article 2
Stoga se zaključuje da su u skladu s člankom 7.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 607/2009 prisutni potrebni elementi koji se odnose na povezanost.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Kada je riječ o ljudskim čimbenicima, smatra se da se profil kiselosti proizvoda može pripisati izboru relativno otpornih sorti u skladu s člankom 93. stavkom 1. točkom (a) podtočkom i.
Done at Brussels, 19 April 2018.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013.
For the Commission
Kada je riječ o tvrdnji da je suvišno navoditi zahtjeve propisane predmetnom uredbom, s obzirom na to da dio zahtjeva nadilazi pravo Unije, njihovo se uključivanje čini primjerenim kako bi se osiguralo da su zahtjevi jasni i da ih potencijalno prihvatljivi proizvođači ispravno tumače.
The President
S obzirom na prethodno navedeno i u skladu s člankom 99.
OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013 Komisija smatra da zahtjev ispunjava uvjete utvrđene u toj uredbi te da bi naziv „Dons” trebalo zaštititi i upisati u registar iz članka 104. te uredbe.
OJ C 407, 8.12.2015, p. 4.
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora za zajedničku organizaciju poljoprivrednih tržišta,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 of 14 July 2009 laying down certain detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards protected designations of origin and geographical indications, traditional terms, labelling and presentation of certain wine sector products (OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 60).
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
Objections were received by email from the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, ‘Confederazione Nazionale dei Consorzi Volontari per la Tutela delle Denominazioni dei Vini Italiani’ (FEDERDOC) and ‘L'Alleanza delle Cooperative Italiane-Agroalimentare’ in line with Articles 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and 14 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009, on 4 February 2016, 5 February 2016 and 8 February 2016 respectively.
Članak 1.
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China as extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from Morocco and the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine kako je proširena na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela poslanih iz Maroka i Republike Koreje, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz tih zemalja ili ne, nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije („Osnovna uredba”), a posebno njezin članak 11. stavak 2.,
Previous investigations and measures in force
POSTUPAK
By Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999, the Council imposed an anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’), Hungary, India, Mexico, Poland, South Africa and Ukraine.
Prethodni ispitni postupci i mjere na snazi
Those measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original measures’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Uredbom (EZ) br. 1796/1999 Vijeće je uvelo antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK”), Mađarske, Indije, Meksika, Poljske, Južne Afrike i Ukrajine.
Thereafter, it was found that circumvention of the original measures concerning imports from Ukraine and the PRC took place via respectively Moldova and via Morocco following investigations pursuant to Article 13 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Te će se mjere dalje u tekstu navoditi kao „početne mjere”, a ispitni postupak koji je doveo do mjera uvedenih Uredbom (EZ) br. 1796/1999 dalje će se u tekstu navoditi kao „početni ispitni postupak”.
Consequently, by Regulation (EC) No 760/2004, the Council extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the Ukraine to imports of the same products consigned from Moldova.
Nakon toga utvrđeno je da su se početne mjere koje se odnose na uvoz iz Ukrajine i NRK-a nakon ispitnih postupaka u skladu s člankom 13.
Similarly, the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the PRC was extended, by Council Regulation (EC) No 1886/2004, to imports of the same products consigned from Morocco.
Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 384/96 izbjegavale preko Moldove odnosno Maroka.
By Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005, the Council, following an expiry review in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, maintained the original measures imposed on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the PRC, India, South Africa and Ukraine.
Stoga je Uredbom (EZ) br. 760/2004 Vijeće proširilo konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu uvedenu na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz Ukrajine na uvoz istih proizvoda poslanih iz Moldove.
As Hungary and Poland became members of the European Union on 1 May 2004, the measures were terminated on that date.
Uredbom (EZ) br. 1858/2005 Vijeće je, nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
In May 2010, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2010 the Council extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 on imports of steel ropes and cables, originating in the PRC, to imports of steel ropes and cables, consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, as a result of an anti-circumvention investigation in accordance with Article 13 of (‘the basic Regulation’).
Uredbe (EZ) br. 384/96, zadržalo početne mjere uvedene na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz NRK-a, Indije, Južne Afrike i Ukrajine.
Certain Korean exporting producers were granted an exemption from the extended duty as they were not found to circumvent the definitive anti-dumping duties.
U svibnju 2010.
The measures applicable to imports originating in India expired on 17 November 2010.
Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 400/2010 Vijeće je konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu uvedenu Uredbom (EZ) br. 1858/2005 na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz NRK-a proširilo na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela poslanih iz Republike Koreje, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz Republike Koreje ili ne, kao rezultat ispitnog postupka u pogledu izbjegavanja mjera u skladu s člankom 13.
In January 2012, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012, the Council, following an expiry review in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, maintained the anti-dumping duty regarding the PRC as extended to Morocco and the Republic of Korea and in Ukraine as extended to Moldova.
Osnovne uredbe.
Those measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the measures in force’ and the expiry review investigation, concluded by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012, will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the previous expiry review’.
Određenim korejskim proizvođačima izvoznicima odobreno je izuzeće od proširene pristojbe jer je utvrđeno da nisu izbjegavali konačne antidampinške pristojbe.
By the same regulation the Council also terminated the proceeding with regard to South Africa.
Mjere koje su se primjenjivale na uvoz podrijetlom iz Indije istekle su 17. studenoga 2010.
The measures applicable to imports originating in South Africa expired on 9 February 2012.
U siječnju 2012.
Request for an expiry review
Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 102/2012 Vijeće je, nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
The request for review was lodged on 7 November 2016 by the Liaison Committee of E.U. Wire Rope Industries (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of steel ropes and cables (‘SRC’).
Dalje u tekstu te se mjere nazivaju „mjere na snazi”, a ispitni postupak revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera, zaključen Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 102/2012, u dalje u tekstu naziva se „prethodna revizija zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera”.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures with regard to the PRC would be likely to result in continuation of dumping and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Istom je uredbom Vijeće prekinulo i postupak u pogledu Južne Afrike.
The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that the expiry of measures in force against Ukraine would likely result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Mjere koje su se primjenjivale na uvoz podrijetlom iz Južne Afrike istekle su 9. veljače 2012.
Initiation
Zahtjev za reviziju zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera
Having determined, after consulting the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 8 February 2017, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘Notice of initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Nakon objave obavijesti o predstojećem isteku mjera Komisija je zaprimila zahtjev za reviziju u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
In the absence of a duly substantiated request for an expiry review concerning imports of SRC originating in Ukraine, the Commission gave notice that the anti-dumping measure with regard to Ukraine would expire.
Osnovne uredbe („zahtjev za reviziju”).
Consequently, the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in Ukraine expired on 10 February 2017.
Zahtjev se temeljio na činjenici da bi istekom mjera koje se odnose na NRK vjerojatno došlo do nastavka dampinga i ponavljanja štete za industriju Unije.
Review investigation period and period considered
Podnositelj zahtjeva nije dostavio dostatne dokaze da bi istekom mjera na snazi koje se odnose na Ukrajinu vjerojatno došlo do nastavka ili ponavljanja dampinga i štete.
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Pokretanje postupka
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the review investigation period - 31 December 2016 (‘the period considered’).
Nakon savjetovanja s Odborom uspostavljenim člankom 15. stavkom 1.
Interested parties
Osnovne uredbe Komisija je utvrdila da postoje dostatni dokazi koji opravdavaju pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera te je 8. veljače 2017. u obavijesti objavljenoj u Službenom listu Europske unije („Obavijest o pokretanju postupka”) najavila pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2.
In the Notice of initiation, the Commission invited all interested parties to participate in the investigation.
Osnovne uredbe.
In addition, the Commission officially advised the applicant, the other known Union producers, the exporting producers in the PRC, importers/users which were known to be concerned, as well as the authorities of the PRC the initiation of the expiry review.
Budući da nije podnesen valjano obrazložen zahtjev za reviziju zbog predstojećeg isteka mjere koja se odnosi na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz Ukrajine, Komisija je obavijestila da će ta antidampinška mjera isteći.
All interested parties were invited to make their views known, submit information and provide supporting evidence within the time-limits set out in the Notice of initiation.
Stoga je antidampinška pristojba uvedena na uvoz čelične užadi i kabela podrijetlom iz Ukrajine istekla 10. veljače 2017.
Interested parties were also granted the opportunity to request in writing a hearing by the Commission investigation services and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije i razmatrano razdoblje
Sampling
Ispitnim postupkom u pogledu nastavka ili ponavljanja dampinga obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2016. do 31. prosinca 2016. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije” ili „RIPR”).