natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
South Africa ZA-1
SL L 18, 23.1.2003., str. 11.
in Part 3, the entry for Zimbabwe is replaced by the following:
Odluka Komisije 2007/777/EZ od 29. studenoga 2007. o utvrđivanju uvjeta za zdravlje životinja i javno zdravlje te obrazaca certifikata za uvoz iz trećih zemalja određenih mesnih proizvoda i obrađenih želudaca, mjehura i crijeva za prehranu ljudi i o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 2005/432/EZ (SL L 312, 30.11.2007., str. 49.).
Zimbabwe
Uredba Komisije (EU) br. 206/2010 od 12. ožujka 2010. o utvrđivanju popisa trećih zemalja, državnih područja ili njihovih dijelova odobrenih za unos u Europsku uniju određenih životinja i svježeg mesa te zahtjeva veterinarskog certificiranja (SL L 73, 20.3.2010., str. 1.).
XXX’.
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 798/2008 od 8. kolovoza 2008. o utvrđivanju popisa trećih zemalja, državnih područja, zona ili kompartmenta iz kojih je dozvoljen uvoz i provoz peradi i proizvoda od peradi kroz Zajednicu te o zahtjevima veterinarskog certificiranja (SL L 226, 23.8.2008., str. 1.).
Farmed feathered game (except ratites)
PRILOG
Farmed ratites
Prilog II.
Having regard to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 7c(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 98/70/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 13. listopada 1998. o kakvoći benzinskih i dizelskih goriva i izmjeni Direktive Vijeća 93/12/EEZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 7.c stavak 4. drugi podstavak,
Having regard to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC [2], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 18(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2009/28/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. travnja 2009. o promicanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih izvora te o izmjeni i kasnijem stavljanju izvan snage direktiva 2001/77/EZ i 2003/30/EZ [2], a posebno njezin članak 18. stavak 4. drugi podstavak,
Articles 7b and 7c of, and Annex IV to, Directive 98/70/EC and Articles 17 and 18 of, and Annex V to, Directive 2009/28/EC lay down similar sustainability criteria for biofuels and bioliquids, and similar procedures for the verification of compliance with those criteria.
Člancima 7.b i 7.c Direktive 98/70/EZ i Prilogom IV. toj direktivi te člancima 17. i 18.
Where biofuels and bioliquids are to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in Article 17(1)(a), (b) and (c) of Directive 2009/28/EC, Member States must require economic operators to show the compliance of biofuels and bioliquids with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(2) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Direktive 2009/28/EZ i Prilogom V. toj direktivi utvrđeni su slični kriteriji održivosti za biogoriva i tekuća biogoriva te slični postupci za provjeru usklađenosti s tim kriterijima.
The Commission may decide that voluntary national or international schemes setting standards for the production of biomass products contain accurate data for the purposes of Article 17(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC, and/or demonstrate that consignments of biofuel or bioliquid comply with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(3), (4) and (5), and/or that no materials have been intentionally modified or discarded so that the consignment or part thereof would fall under Annex IX.
Ako se biogoriva i tekuća biogoriva uzimaju u obzir za potrebe navedene u članku 17. stavku 1. točkama (a), (b) i (c) Direktive 2009/28/EZ, države članice moraju od gospodarskih subjekata zahtijevati da dokažu da biogoriva i tekuća biogoriva ispunjavaju kriterije održivosti iz članka 17. stavaka od 2. do 5.
When an economic operator provides proof or data obtained in accordance with a voluntary scheme that has been recognised by the Commission, to the extent covered by the recognition decision, a Member State is barred from requiring the supplier to provide further evidence of compliance with the sustainability criteria.
Direktive 2009/28/EZ.
16, 53177 Bonn, Germany
Ako gospodarski subjekt podastre dokaze ili podatke dobivene u skladu s dobrovoljnim programom koji priznaje Komisija, u mjeri obuhvaćenoj tom odlukom o priznavanju, država članica ne smije od dobavljača zahtijevati dodatne dokaze o usklađenosti s kriterijima održivosti.
covers covers a wide range of feedstocks including wastes and residues and the entire chain of custody.
Sjedište programa nalazi se na adresi Schwertberger Str.
The recognised scheme documents will be made available at the transparency platform established under Directive 2009/28/EC.
16, 53177 Bonn, Njemačka
Assessment of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme found it to cover adequately the sustainability criteria of Directive 98/70/EC and of Directive 2009/28/EC, as well as applying a mass balance methodology in line with the requirements of Article 7c(1) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 18(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
, a program obuhvaća širok raspon sirovina, uključujući otpad i ostatke, te cijeli lanac nadzora.
The assessment of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme found that it meets adequate standards of reliability, transparency and independent auditing and also complies with the methodological requirements in Annex IV to Directive 98/70/EC and Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC.
Dokumenti o priznatom programu bit će dostupni na platformi za transparentnost uspostavljenoj Direktivom 2009/28/EZ.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Sustainability of Biofuels and Bioliquids,
Procjenom dobrovoljnog programa „REDcert” utvrđeno je da on na odgovarajući način obuhvaća kriterije održivosti iz Direktive 98/70/EZ i Direktive 2009/28/EZ te da se u okviru programa primjenjuje metodologija masene bilance u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 7.c stavka 1.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Direktive 98/70/EZ i članka 18. stavka 1.
Article 1
Direktive 2009/28/EZ.
The ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme (hereinafter ‘the scheme’), submitted for recognition to the Commission on 24 May 2017, demonstrates that consignments of biofuels and bioliquids produced in accordance with the standards for the production of biofuels and bioliquids set in the scheme comply with the sustainability criteria as laid down in Article 7b(3), (4) and (5) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 17(3), (4) and (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Procjenom dobrovoljnog programa „REDcert” utvrđeno je da on ispunjava odgovarajuće norme pouzdanosti, transparentnosti i neovisne revizije te da je u skladu s metodološkim zahtjevima iz Priloga IV.
The scheme also contains accurate data for the purposes of Article 17(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC and Article 7b(2) of Directive 98/70/EC.
Direktivi 98/70/EZ i Priloga V. Direktivi 2009/28/EZ.
Article 2
Mjere predviđene ovom Odlukom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora za održivost biogoriva i tekućih biogoriva,
If the contents of the scheme, as submitted for recognition to the Commission on 24 May 2017, change in a way that might affect the basis of this Decision, such changes shall be notified to the Commission without delay.
DONIJELA JE OVU ODLUKU:
The Commission shall assess the notified changes with a view to establish whether the scheme is still adequately covering the sustainability criteria for which it is recognised.
Članak 1.
Article 3
Dobrovoljnim programom „REDcert” (dalje u tekstu: „program”), podnesenim Komisiji 24. svibnja 2017. u svrhu priznavanja, dokazuje se da pošiljke biogoriva i tekućih biogoriva proizvedenih u skladu s normama za njihovu proizvodnju utvrđenima u okviru programa ispunjuju kriterije održivosti utvrđene u članku 7.b stavcima 3., 4. i 5.
The Commission may repeal this Decision, inter alia, under the following circumstances:
Direktive 98/70/EZ te članku 17. stavcima 3., 4. i 5.
if it has been clearly demonstrated that the scheme has not implemented elements considered to be decisive for this Decision or if severe and structural breach of those elements has taken place;
Direktive 2009/28/EZ.
if the scheme fails to submit annual reports to the Commission pursuant to Article 7c(6) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 18(6) of Directive 2009/28/EC;
Program sadržava i točne podatke za potrebe članka 17. stavka 2.
if the scheme fails to implement standards of independent auditing specified in implementing acts referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 7c(5) of Directive 98/70/EC and the third subparagraph of Article 18(5) of Directive 2009/28/EC or improvements to other elements of the scheme considered to be decisive for a continued recognition.
Direktive 2009/28/EZ i članka 7.b stavka 2.
Article 4
Direktive 98/70/EZ.
It shall apply until 12 August 2022.
Ako se sadržaj programa, kako je podnesen Komisiji 24. svibnja 2017. u svrhu priznavanja, promijeni tako da bi to moglo utjecati na osnovu ove Odluke, o tome je potrebno bez odgode obavijestiti Komisiju.
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2017.
Komisija procjenjuje promjene o kojima je obaviještena kako bi se utvrdilo obuhvaća li program i dalje na odgovarajući način kriterije održivosti za koje je priznat.
The President
Komisija može ovu Odluku staviti izvan snage, među ostalim u sljedećim slučajevima:
OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58.
ako se jasno pokaže da u programu nisu provedeni elementi koji se smatraju ključnima za ovu Odluku ili ako su oni teško i strukturno narušeni;
OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16.
ako se za program Komisiji ne podnesu godišnja izvješća kako je predviđeno člankom 7.c stavkom 6.
The request to recognise that the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme demonstrates that consignments of biofuel comply with the sustainability criteria set out in Directive 98/70/EC and Directive 2009/28/EC was submitted to the Commission on 24 May 2017.
Direktive 98/70/EZ i člankom 18. stavkom 6.
On 10 March 2015 the CARIFORUM-EU Special Committee on Customs Cooperation and Trade Facilitation adopted Decision No 1/2015 [2] granting a derogation from the rules of origin with regard to certain textile products imported into the Union in accordance with Article 39(2) and Article 39(6)(b) of Protocol I to the EPA, from 10 March 2015 to 9 March 2017.
Nadalje, člankom 39. stavkom 6. točkom (b) tog Protokola predviđa se da pri razmatranju zahtjevâ za odstupanje posebno treba uzeti u obzir one slučajeve u kojima bi primjena postojećih pravila o podrijetlu znatno utjecala na sposobnost postojeće industrije u državi ili državama CARIFORUM-a da nastavi izvoziti u EU, a posebno ako bi to moglo dovesti do prekida njezinih djelatnosti.
In accordance with Article 13 of Protocol I to the EPA, the conditions for acquiring originating status set out in Title II of Protocol I must be fulfilled without interruption in the CARIFORUM States or the EU.
Odluku br. 1/2015 [2] o odobravanju odstupanja od pravila o podrijetlu u odnosu na određene tekstilne proizvode koji se uvoze u Uniju u skladu s člankom 39. stavkom 2. i člankom 39. stavkom 6. točkom (b) Protokola I. uz SGP u razdoblju od 10. ožujka 2015. do 9. ožujka 2017.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 [3] lays down rules for the management of tariff quotas.
Odstupanje bi se moglo produljiti za jednu godinu ako Haiti ne dovrši postupak ratifikacije tijekom prve godine odstupanja.
Article 1
Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 [3] utvrđuju se pravila o upravljanju carinskim kvotama.
(notified under document C(2017) 439)
(priopćeno pod brojem dokumenta C(2017) 439)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 108. stavak 2. podstavak 1.,
By letter of 25 November 2008, the Commission sent the French authorities a request for information relating to the complaint.
Dopisom od 25. studenoga 2008.
By letter of 13 January 2009, the French authorities asked the Commission to allow them extra time in which to reply to the Commission's questions.
Komisija je francuskim nadležnim tijelima poslala zahtjev za dostavljanje informacija koje se odnose na navedenu pritužbu.
The time limit for replying was extended to 18 February 2009.
Francuska nadležna tijela odgovorila su 26. veljače 2009. na zahtjev Komisije za dostavljanje informacija.
The French authorities replied to the Commission's request for information on 26 February 2009.
Dopisima od 20. travnja, 2. rujna i 17. studenoga 2010. podnositelj pritužbe Komisiji je dostavio dodatne informacije o mjerama koje je odobrila regija.
By letters of 20 April, 2 September and 17 November 2010, the complainant sent the Commission further information regarding the measures awarded by the Region.
Budući da nisu zaprimila nikakav zahtjev za dodatne informacije, francuska nadležna tijela dopisom od 31. svibnja 2011. zatražila su od Komisije pismenu potvrdu zaključenja postupka prikupljanja informacija.
Having received no request for further information, the French authorities, by letter of 31 May 2011, asked the Commission for written confirmation that the investigation procedure had been closed.
Dopisom od 8. lipnja 2011.
By letter of 8 June 2011, the Commission asked the French authorities to comment on the additional information supplied by the complainant.
Komisija je od francuskih nadležnih tijela zatražila da dostave komentare o dodatnim informacijama koje je dostavio podnositelj pritužbe.
The Commission sent reminders by letter on 14 November 2011 and 29 February 2012 and by email on 22 September and 8 December 2011, but did not receive any response.
Unatoč pismima opomene od 14. studenoga 2011. i 29. veljače 2012. te dopisima od 22. rujna i 8. prosinca 2011., Komisija na svoj zahtjev za informacije nije dobila odgovor.
On 11 March 2014, and without ever having received the said information, the Commission therefore initiated the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).
Budući da tražene informacije nisu dostavljene, Komisija je 11. ožujka 2014. pokrenula službeni istražni postupak u skladu s člankom 108. stavkom 2.
The Commission also received comments from seven interested third parties.
U dopisu od 3. rujna 2014.
The Commission forwarded them to France, giving France the opportunity to comment on them.
Francuska je izjavila da nema komentara.
By letter of 3 September 2014, France informed the Commission that it had no comment to make.
Nakon isteka dogovorenoga roka Komisija je 21. lipnja 2016. zaprimila zajedničku bilješku četiriju od sedam zainteresiranih strana.
On 21 June 2016, outside the deadline, the Commission received a joint note from four of the seven interested third parties.
Svrha ove bilješke bila je razjašnjavanje položaja tih trećih strana nakon donošenja presude Suda u postupku Europska Komisija protiv Jorgena Andersena (dalje u tekstu: „presuda Jorgen Andersen”) [3].
The purpose of this note was primarily to set out the position of the third parties concerned following the judgment by the Court in European Commission v Jørgen Andersen (‘the Jørgen Andersen judgment’) [3].
Regija je naposljetku u dodatnoj bilješci od 9. studenoga 2016. dopunila svoje primjedbe.
Lastly, the Region added to its comments by sending a supplementary note on 9 November 2016.
KONTEKST I PRIKAZ NAVEDENIH MJERA
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES
S više od 12 milijuna stanovnika, u regiji Île-de-France živi 18,8 % ukupnog stanovništva Francuske, što je čini najnapučenijom i najgušće naseljenom regijom (996 st./km2).
Île-de-France, with more than 12 million inhabitants, alone accounts for 18,8 % of the population of France, which makes it the most heavily and the most densely populated region of the country (996 inhabitants per sq. km).
Prema Institutu za prostorno uređenje i urbanizam regije Île-de-France (fr.
According to the Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme d'Île-de-France [4], Île-de-France holds the European records for traffic volumes, with an average of more than 240000 vehicles per day on five of its sections of road (three sections of the ring road, one section of the A1 and one of the A4), which greatly exceeds the load on the busiest stretches of the motorways in London, Berlin or Milan.
Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme d'Île-de-France [4]) pet dionica cestovne mreže te regije drži europski prometni rekord s prosječno više od 240000 vozila dnevno: tri dionice perifernog bulevara, dionica autoceste A1 i dionica autoceste A4 koje nadaleko premašuju najprometnije dionice londonskih, berlinskih i milanskih autocesta.
One in two counting stations on the network run by the Île-de-France Road Directorate exceeds a figure of 18000 vehicles per day and per carriageway, although this level of traffic is considered characteristic of a very serious situation on the major national motorways in the rest of France.
Svakom drugom stanicom mreže kojom upravlja Uprava cestovnog prometa regije Île-de-France (Direction des routes d'Île-de-France) po danu i po cesti prođe više od 18000 vozila.
23 million motorised journeys are made in Île-de-France (representing two thirds of journeys made).
Međutim, takav se intenzitet prometa u kontekstu velikih nacionalnih autocesta u ostatku Francuske smatra značajkom vrlo lošeg stanja.
More than half of these journeys are made using private vehicles (there are more than four million cars in the region) or utility vehicles.
U regiji Île-de-France otprilike 23 milijuna putovanja obavlja se vozilima (odnosno dvije trećine ukupnih putovanja).
The remainder are made using public transport.
Više od polovine putovanja odnosi se na privatne automobile (vozni park s više od četiri milijuna vozila) ili teretna vozila.
A sign of the over-use of the main network in Île-de-France is also the consistently heavy traffic: the hourly flow often stays at maximum level from 6 am to 9 pm, with daily throughput virtually stable throughout the year.
Ostatak čine sredstva javnog prijevoza.
At such levels of use, slight variations in vehicle numbers can lead to widely differing speeds and quickly result in congestion.
Preopterećenje glavne mreže regije Île de France odražava se trajno gustom cirkulacijom prometa: protok prometa po satu često je najviši između 6 sati i 21 sat, a dnevni promet gotovo je stabilan tijekom cijele godine.
The negative externalities associated with such levels of congestion are plain: air pollution, time wasted, increased numbers of accidents, a fall in the attractiveness of the area, etc.
Pri ovakvoj gustoći prometa već i manja variranja mogu dovesti do velikih odstupanja u brzini te stvoriti prometna zagušenja.
In this situation, it is essential to develop and provide forms of public transport which attract users if sustainable mobility is to be achieved.
Prisutne su i negativne posljedice takvih zagušenja: zagađenje zraka, gubitak vremena, porast broja nesreća, opadanje privlačnosti područja itd.
The Commission's in-depth investigation focused on a support system for investment in undertakings providing scheduled public transport services by road under public-service contracts, in the specific circumstances in Île-de-France, which should be taken into account.
U ovakvoj situaciji neophodno je razviti atraktivnu ponudu javnog prijevoza kako bi se postigla održiva mobilnost.
This system has developed over time depending on the arrangements for organising scheduled public transport by road in Île-de-France, which prompted the Commission to draw a distinction between two periods:
Temeljita istraga Komisije usmjerena je na sustav potpora za ulaganja dodijeljenih poduzećima javnog cestovnog prijevoza koja su potpisala ugovor o pružanju javne usluge u regiji Île-de-France, čiju je specifičnost potrebno uzeti u obzir.
the period from 1994 to 2008, during which the Region granted investment subsidies in return for the signing of a rider to operating agreements already reached between a transport undertaking and a public authority;
Ovaj se sustav s vremenom mijenjao ovisno o organizaciji redovnog javnog cestovnog prijevoza u regiji Île-de-France, zbog čega Komisija razlikuje dva razdoblja:
the period from 2008 to 2016, during which subsidies were awarded by the Syndicat des Transports d'Île-de-France (Île-de-France Transport Authority) (‘STIF’) as part of the new system of organising transport in Île-de-France in place since 2007.
razdoblje od 1994. do 2008. tijekom kojeg je subvencije za ulaganja dodjeljivala regija nakon potpisivanja dopune ugovora prethodno sklopljenih između prijevoznog poduzeća i jedinice javne uprave;
This period itself subdivides into two subperiods, corresponding to the two types of public-service contract set up successively by STIF.
razdoblje od 2008. do 2016. tijekom kojeg je financijske potpore dodjeljivao sindikat prijevoznika regije Île-de-France (Syndicat des Transports d'Île-de-France, STIF) u okviru nove strukture javnog prijevoza koja prevladava u regiji od 2007.
Measures implemented by the Region
Ovo se razdoblje dijeli na dva podrazdoblja u kojima je STIF uveo dva tipa ugovora o javnim uslugama.
On 20 October 1994, the Region adopted a decision [5] aimed at renewing a set of measures introduced in 1979 [6] for the benefit of undertakings operating scheduled public transport services by road in the Île-de-France region.
Mjere koje je provodila regija
Before the 1994 decision, there had already been two decisions amending the original 1979 mechanism, one in 1984 (CF 84-07) and one in 1987 (CR 87-07).
Regija je 20. listopada 1994. donijela odluku [5] o daljnjoj provedbi mjera uvedenih 1979.
Two other decisions came after it, in 1998 (CR 44-98) and in 2001 (CR 47-01), until the mechanism was finally repealed in 2008.
[6] u korist poduzeća koja su obavljala usluge javnog cestovnog prijevoza u regiji Île-de-France.
Under these decisions, the Region was able to grant financial aid to public authorities which had either signed a contract for scheduled bus services with a private undertaking or were operating them directly under local authority control.
Prije odluke iz 1994. dvjema prethodnim odlukama već je izmijenjena prvobitna mjera iz 1979.: odlukom iz 1984.
The public authorities paid this aid over to the transport undertaking where the latter was the owner of the subsidised investment.
(CR 84-07) i odlukom iz 1987.
The subsidies granted were mainly intended to be used for the acquisition of new vehicles in return for a quantitative improvement in the service (increased frequencies or capacity, extension of routes or creation of new routes), a qualitative improvement in the service (adherence to a quality charter, buses with lowered decks), the installation of new equipment on board the vehicles (audio or visual stop announcement systems), the introduction of systems to issue and validate tickets, the upgrading of bus-stops and signs, or the carrying out of studies.
(CR 87-07).
The local authorities had to send their applications for subsidies to the Region.
Uslijedile su još dvije odluke 1998.
The rate of subsidy varied between 25 % and 60 % of costs excluding tax.
(CR 44-98) i 2001.
There were ceilings on the amount of subsidy depending on the type of costs involved.
(CR 47-01), sve dok mjera napokon nije ukinuta 2008.
Recipients of the aid had to undertake to maintain the quantitative and qualitative improvements in the service supplied, the vehicles and the equipment for at least five years from the date on which they were brought into service.
Provedbom ovih odluka regija je mogla dodijeliti financijsku potporu jedinicama javne uprave koje su ili sklopile ugovor s privatnim poduzećima o obavljanju prijevoza na redovnim autobusnim linijama ili su ga obavljale izravno preko javnog poduzeća.
For those five years, vehicles benefiting from the subsidies had to be used essentially and as a matter of priority on the routes concerned.
Jedinice javne uprave isplaćivale su tu potporu prijevoznom poduzeću kada je to poduzeće bilo vlasnik subvencioniranih ulaganja.