natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Organisation of oversight activities
„Članak 21.
A competent authority may carry out continuous and/or ad hoc oversight activities to assess the compliance by a SIPS operator with the requirements set out in Articles 3 to 21 or to promote the smooth operation of payment systems at systemic level.
Ovlasti nadležnog tijela
Article 21b
Nadležno tijelo ovlašteno je:
Confidentiality
u bilo koje doba od upravitelja SIPS-a dobiti sve informacije i dokumente potrebne za procjenu usklađenosti sa zahtjevima iz ove Uredbe ili promicanja nesmetanog funkcioniranja platnih sustava na sistemskoj razini.
Information shared by a SIPS operator with a competent authority on a confidential basis may be shared within the European System of Central Banks (ESCB).
Upravitelj SIPS-a dužan je dostaviti sve bitne informacije nadležnom tijelu bez nepotrebne odgode;
Such information shall be treated as confidential by the members of the ESCB, in accordance with the duty of professional secrecy laid down in Article 37.1 of the Statute of the ESCB.’;
zahtijevati od upravitelja SIPS-a da imenuje neovisnog stručnjaka radi provođenja istraživanja ili neovisne provjere djelovanja SIPS-a.
Article 22 is replaced by the following:
Nadležno tijelo može odrediti zahtjeve u pogledu vrste stručnjaka koji se imenuju, sadržaja i obuhvata izvješća koje će se izraditi, postupanje s izvješćem, uključujući dostavu podataka i javnu objavu određenih elemenata i vremena potrebnog za izradu izvješća.
‘Article 22
Upravitelj SIPS-a dužan je izvijestiti nadležno tijelo o tome na koji način je udovoljeno određenim zahtjevima;
Corrective measures
provoditi izravne inspekcije ili delegirati provođenje izravnih inspekcija.
Where a SIPS operator has not complied with this Regulation or where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a SIPS operator has not complied with this Regulation, the competent authority shall:
Kada pravilna provedba i učinkovitost inspekcije to zahtijevaju, nadležno tijelo ju može provesti bez prethodne najave.
give written notice to the SIPS operator of the nature of the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance; and
ESB je dužan donijeti odluku o postupcima i uvjetima za izvršavanje ovlasti iz stavka 1.”
give the SIPS operator the opportunity to be heard and to provide explanations.
Umeću se sljedeći članci 21.a i 21.b:
Taking into account the information provided by the SIPS operator, the competent authority may impose corrective measures on the SIPS operator to remedy the non-compliance and/or avoid repeating it.
„Članak 21.a
The competent authority may impose corrective measures immediately if it finds that the non-compliance is serious enough to require immediate action.
Organizacija nadzornih aktivnosti
It shall provide reasons for its decision.
Nadležno tijelo može vršiti trajne i/ili ad hoc nadzorne aktivnosti radi procjene usklađenosti upravitelja SIPS-a sa zahtjevima određenim u člancima 3. do 21. ili radi promicanja nesmetanog funkcioniranja platnih sustava na sistemskoj razini.
A competent authority other than the ECB shall inform the ECB of its intention to impose corrective measures on a SIPS operator without undue delay.
Članak 21.b
Corrective measures may be imposed independently of or in parallel to sanctions imposed under Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98.
Povjerljivost
The ECB shall adopt a decision on the procedure to be followed if corrective measures are imposed.
Povjerljive informacije koje je upravitelj SIPS-a razmijenio s nadležnim tijelom mogu biti razmijenjene unutar Europskog sustava središnjih banaka (ESSB).
Article 23 is replaced by the following:
Članovi ESSB-a dužni su s takvim informacijama postupati kao s povjerljivim informacijama, u skladu s obvezom čuvanja profesionalne tajne propisane u članku 37. stavku 1.
‘Article 23
Statuta ESSB-a.”
Sanctions
14.
In the case of an infringement of this Regulation, the ECB may impose sanctions.
Članak 22. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Article 24 is replaced by the following:
Kada upravitelj SIPS-a ne postupa u skladu s ovom Uredbom ili kada postoje opravdani razlozi za sumnju da upravitelj SIPS-a ne postupa u skladu s ovom Uredbom, nadležno tijelo dužno je:
‘Article 24
obavijestiti u pisanom obliku upravitelja SIPS-a o prirodi postupanja protivno Uredbi ili sumnji na postupanje protivno Uredbi; i
Review
dati upravitelju SIPS-a mogućnost da bude saslušan i dostavi obrazloženje.
The Governing Council shall review the general application of this Regulation by no later than two years following the date on which it enters into force, and thereafter every three years, and assess whether it needs to be amended.’.
Uzimajući u obzir informacije koje dostavi upravitelj SIPS-a, nadležno tijelo može izreći korektivne mjere upravitelju SIPS-a radi ispravljanja postupanja protivno Uredbi i/ili izbjegavanja njihova ponavljanja.
Article 2
Nadležno tijelo može naložiti korektivne mjere neposredno nakon što utvrdi da je postupanje protivno Uredbi dovoljno ozbiljno da zahtijeva neposredno djelovanje.
Final provisions
Nadležno tijelo dužno je obrazložiti svoju odluku.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Nadležno tijelo koje nije ESB, dužno je izvijestiti ESB o svojoj namjeri izricanja korektivnih mjera upravitelju SIPS-a bez nepotrebnog odgađanja.
SIPS operators who were notified of the decision of the Governing Council pursuant to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) before this Regulation enters into force shall have one year from the date of entry into force to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, except for the requirements laid down in points (5) and (6) of Article 1 in respect of which they shall have 18 months.
Korektivne mjere mogu se izreći neovisno od sankcija ili istodobno sa sankcijama izrečenim na temelju Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 2532/98.
SIPS operators who are notified of the decision of the Governing Council pursuant to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) after this Regulation enters into force shall have one year from the date of notification to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, except for the requirements laid down in points (5) and (6) of Article 1 in respect of which they shall have 18 months.
ESB donosi odluku o postupku koji treba poštovati ako se izriču korektivne mjere.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
15.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 3 November 2017.
Članak 23. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
For the Governing Council of the ECB
„Članak 23.
The President of the ECB
Sankcije
Available on the Bank for International Settlements' website at www.bis.org.
U slučaju povrede ove Uredbe, ESB može izreći sankcije.
Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank of 3 July 2014 on oversight requirements for systemically important payment systems (ECB/2014/28) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 16).
Članak 24. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35).
„Članak 24.
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
Provjera
Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Upravno vijeće dužno je provjeriti opću primjenu ove Uredbe najkasnije dvije godine nakon datuma njezina stupanja na snagu, a nakon toga svake tri godine i procijeniti je li ju potrebno izmijeniti.”
Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (OJ L 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7).’;
Članak 2.
Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank of 19 December 2014 on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2014/60) (OJ L 91, 2.4.2015, p. 3).
Završne odredbe
Guideline ECB/2014/31 of the European Central Bank of 9 July 2014 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral and amending Guideline ECB/2007/9 (OJ L 240, 13.8.2014, p. 28).’;
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p. 4).’;
Upravitelji SIPS-a koji su bili obaviješteni o odluci Upravnog vijeća u skladu s člankom 1. stavkom 2.
Regulation (EC) No 2157/99 of the European Central Bank of 23 September 1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/1999/4) (OJ L 264, 12.10.1999, p. 21).’;
Uredbe (EU) br. 795/2014 (ESB/2014/28) prije stupanja na snagu ove Uredbe imaju godinu dana od dana stupanja na snagu za usklađivanje sa zahtjevima utvrđenim ovom Uredbom, osim za zahtjeve određene u članku 1. točkama 5. i 6. u odnosu na koje će imati 18 mjeseci.
The assessment found that certain matters required improvement or clarification and, in a few cases, a need for more substantial amendments seeking to ensure the application of the highest oversight standards.
Direktiva 2004/39/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. travnja 2004. o tržištima financijskih instrumenata te o izmjeni direktiva Vijeća 85/611/EEZ i 93/6/EEZ i Direktive 2000/12/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća te stavljanju izvan snage Direktive Vijeća 93/22/EEZ (SL L 145, 30.4.2004., str. 1.).
First, the competent authority should have the power to require a SIPS operator to appoint an independent expert to perform an investigation or independent review of the SIPS's operation.
Direktiva 2009/110/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 16. rujna 2009. o osnivanju, obavljanju djelatnosti i bonitetnom nadzoru poslovanja institucija za elektronički novac te o izmjeni direktiva 2005/60/EZ i 2006/48/EZ i stavljanju izvan snage Direktive 2000/46/EZ (SL L 267, 10.10.2009., str. 7.)”;
Regulation (EU) 2017/2095 of the European Central Bank
Uredba (EU) 2017/2095 Europske središnje banke
amending Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/2017/34)
o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 2157/1999 o ovlastima Europske središnje banke za izricanje sankcija (ESB/2017/34)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 132(3) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 132. stavak 3.,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Articles 34.3 and 19.1 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Statut Europskog sustava središnjih banaka i Europske središnje banke, a posebno njegov članak 34.3. i članak 19.1.,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions [1], and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 2532/98 od 23. studenoga 1998. o ovlastima Europske središnje banke za izricanje sankcija [1], a posebno njezin članak 6. stavak 2.,
The European Central Bank (ECB) has applied Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 of the European Central Bank (ECB/1999/4) [2] to impose sanctions in its various fields of competence, including in particular the implementation of the monetary policy of the Union, the operation of payment systems and the collection of statistical information.
ESB je primijenio Uredbu (EZ) br. 2157/1999 Europske središnje banke (ESB/1999/4) [2] za izricanje sankcija u svojim raznim područjima nadležnosti, uključujući naročito provođenje monetarne politike Unije, funkcioniranje platnih sustava i prikupljanje statističkih podataka.
Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2014/28) [3] entitles the ECB to impose sanctions on operators of systemically important payment systems (SIPS) in the case of an infringement of that Regulation.
Uredba (EU) br. 795/2014 Europske središnje banke (ESB/2014/28) [3] ovlašćuje ESB za izricanje sankcija upraviteljima sistemski važnih platnih sustava (SIPS) u slučaju povrede te Uredbe.
In the area of the oversight of SIPS, the experience gained in conducting the first comprehensive assessment under Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) has demonstrated that certain amendments need to be made to Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 (ECB/1999/4) to ensure that sanctions can be effectively imposed for oversight infringements.
U području nadzora SIPS-a, iskustvo stečeno kod provedbe prve sveobuhvatne procjene u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 795/2014 (ESB/2014/48) pokazalo je da su potrebne određene izmjene Uredbe (EZ) br. 2157/1999 (ESB/1999/4) kako bi se osiguralo učinkovito izricanje sankcija za povrede nadzora.
In particular, clarification of the definition of a competent national central bank is required to ensure consistency with the definition of a competent authority in Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
Posebno, pojašnjenje definicije nadležne nacionalne središnje banke potrebno je radi osiguravanja dosljednosti s definicijom nadležnog tijela u Uredbi (EU) br. 795/2014 (ESB/2014/28).
Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 (ECB/1999/4) should be amended accordingly,
Uredbu (EZ) br. 2157/1999 (ESB/1999/4) trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti,
Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 (ECB/1999/4) is amended as follows:
Uredba (EZ) br. 2157/1999 (ESB/1999/4) mijenja se kako slijedi:
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term ‘competent national central bank’ means the national central bank of the Member State in whose jurisdiction the alleged infringement has occurred or, for infringements in the field of oversight of systemically important payment systems, it means the Eurosystem central bank that has been identified as a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2014/28).
Definicije
Other terms used have the same meaning as defined in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2532/98.2. in Article 1b, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Za potrebe ove Uredbe, pojam ‚nadležna nacionalna središnja banka’ znači nacionalna središnja banka države članice na čijem je području nadležnosti nastala navodna povreda, ili za povrede u području nadzora sistemski važnih platnih sustava, znači središnja banka Eurosustava koja je utvrđena kao nadležno tijelu u smislu značenja članka 2. stavka 5.
For the purposes of deciding whether to initiate an infringement procedure pursuant to Article 2 and exercise the powers laid down in Article 3, the ECB shall establish an internal independent investigating unit (hereinafter ‘investigating unit’) composed of investigating officers who shall perform their investigative functions independently from the Executive Board and the Governing Council, and shall not take part in the deliberations of the Executive Board and Governing Council.
Uredbe (EU) br. 795/2014 Europske središnje banke (ESB/2014/28).
The investigating unit shall comprise investigating officers with a range of relevant knowledge, skills and experience.’;
Ostali pojmovi koji se upotrebljavaju imaju isto značenje utvrđeno u članku 1.
in Article 1b, the following paragraph 1a is inserted:
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2532/98,2.
For the investigation of infringements of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28), the ECB may appoint as investigating officers: (i) members of staff of the ECB or of a national central bank of a Member State, as long as the appointment is accepted by the relevant national central bank; or (ii) external experts acting on the basis of an appropriate mandate.
U članku 1.b, stavak 1. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
The ECB may not appoint as investigating officers members of the Market Infrastructure and Payments Committee or members of staff of the ECB or of a national central bank of a Member State who have been directly involved in the activities of the assessment group that carried out the initial oversight assessment identifying an infringement or grounds for suspecting an infringement.’;
Za potrebe donošenja odluke o pokretanju postupka radi utvrđivanja povrede u skladu s člankom 2. i izvršavanju ovlasti utvrđenih u članku 3., ESB osniva internu neovisnu istražnu jedinicu (dalje u tekstu ‚istražna jedinica’) koja se sastoji od službenika nadležnih za istragu koji obavljaju svoje istražne funkcije neovisno od Izvršnog odbora i Upravnog vijeća i ne sudjeluju u raspravama Izvršnog odbora i Upravnog vijeća.
in Article 8, the following paragraph 3 is added:
Istražna jedinica obuhvaća službenike nadležne za istragu koji imaju raspon odgovarajućih znanja, vještina i iskustva.”;
In carrying out the review, the Governing Council may:
u članku 1.b umeće se sljedeći stavak 1.a:
confirm the decision of the Executive Board;
Za istragu o povredama Uredbe (EU) br. 795/2014 (ESB/2014/28), ESB može kao službenike nadležne za istragu imenovati: i. zaposlenike ESB-a ili nacionalne središnje banke države članice, sve dok odgovarajuća nacionalna središnja banka prihvaća imenovanje; ili ii. vanjske stručnjake koji djeluju na temelju odgovarajućeg ovlaštenja.
amend the decision of the Executive Board by modifying the amount of the sanction to be imposed and/or the grounds giving rise to an infringement;
ESB ne može kao službenike nadležne za istragu imenovati članove Odbora za tržišnu infrastrukturu i platni promet, zaposlenike ESB-a ili zaposlenike nacionalne središnje banke koji su bili izravno uključeni u aktivnosti skupine za procjenu koja je provela prvotnu procjenu nadzora kojom su utvrđeni povrede ili razlozi za sumnju o počinjenoj povredi.”;
set aside the decision of the Executive Board.’;
u članku 8. dodaje se sljedeći stavak 3.:
in Article 10, the following paragraph 4 is added:
Kod provođenja preispitivanja, Upravno vijeće može:
This Article shall not apply to sanctions for infringements of ECB regulations and decisions in the field of oversight of systemically important payment systems.’.
potvrditi odluku Izvršnog odbora;
Article 2
izmijeniti odluku Izvršnog odbora izmjenom iznosa sankcije koja se treba izreći i ili/osnovu na temelju koje nastaje povreda;
Entry into force
ukinuti odluku Izvršnog odbora.”;
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
u članku 10. dodaje se sljedeći stavak 4.:
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Ovaj se članak ne primjenjuje na sankcije za povrede uredbi i odluka ESB-a u području nadzora sistemski važnih platnih sustava.”.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 3 November 2017.
Članak 2.
The President of the ECB
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana nakon dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p. 4.
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i neposredno se primjenjuje u državama članicama u skladu s Ugovorima.
Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 of the European Central Bank of 23 September 1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/1999/4) (OJ L 264, 12.10.1999, p. 21).
Sastavljeno u Frankfurtu na Majni 3. studenoga 2017.
Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank of 3 July 2014 on oversight requirements for systemically important payment systems (ECB/2014/28) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 16).
Upravno vijeće ESB-a
Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank of 3 July 2014 on oversight requirements for systemically important payment systems (ECB/2014/28) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 16).’;
Predsjednik ESB-a
setting out scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and Council
o utvrđivanju znanstvenih kriterija za određivanje svojstava endokrine disrupcije u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 528/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 5(3) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 528/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. svibnja 2012. o stavljanju na raspolaganje na tržištu i uporabi biocidnih proizvoda [1], a posebno njezin članak 5. stavak 3. prvi podstavak,
Scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 should be developed taking into account the purpose of that Regulation to improve the free movement of biocidal products within the Union while ensuring a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment.
Znanstvene kriterije za određivanje svojstava endokrine disrupcije u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 528/2012 trebalo bi utvrditi uzimajući u obzir svrhu te Uredbe, tj. poboljšanje slobodnog kretanja biocidnih proizvoda u Uniji uz istodobno osiguranje visokog stupnja zaštite zdravlja ljudi, zdravlja životinja te okoliša.
In order to implement those criteria, weight of evidence should be applied considering in particular the approach provided for in Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 and in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and Council [6] on the weight of evidence.
Za provedbu tih kriterija trebalo bi primijeniti vrijednost dokaza, posebno uzimajući u obzir pristup iz Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012 i Uredbe (EZ) br. 1272/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [6] o vrijednosti dokaza.
In addition, the implementation of the criteria should be based on all relevant scientific evidence, including studies submitted in accordance with the current regulatory data requirements of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Osim toga, provedba kriterija trebala bi se temeljiti na svim relevantnim znanstvenim dokazima, uključujući studije dostavljene u skladu s trenutačnim zahtjevima za podacima iz Uredbe (EU) br. 528/2012.
Substances whose intended biocidal mode of action, within the meaning of point 6.5, Title 1 of Annex II of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, is to control target organisms other than vertebrates via their endocrine system, therefore present a mode of action which is not expected to be relevant for vertebrates.
Tvari čiji je predviđeni biocidni način djelovanja, u smislu glave 1. točke 6.5.
These substances consequently do not generally pose a risk via this intended mode of action to humans and vertebrates in the environment and are therefore particularly effective and useful in integrated pest management.
Priloga II.
When setting the criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties that may cause adverse effects on non-target organisms, it is appropriate, in view of the objectives of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, and the principle of proportionality, to take account of the above scientific considerations.
Uredbi (EU) br. 528/2012, suzbijanje ciljnih organizama koji nisu kralježnjaci putem njihova endokrinog sustava imaju stoga način djelovanja za koji se ne očekuje da je relevantan za kralježnjake.
Therefore, where the intended mode of action consists of controlling target organisms other than vertebrates via their endocrine systems, the effects caused by that intended mode of action on organisms of the same taxonomic phylum as the targeted one should not be considered for the purposes of the identification of endocrine-disrupting properties with respect to non-target organisms.
Stoga te tvari svojim predviđenim načinom djelovanja općenito ne predstavljaju rizik za ljude i druge kralježnjake u okolišu te su stoga posebno djelotvorne i korisne u integriranoj zaštiti bilja.