natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The negotiations were successfully concluded by the initialling of the Agreement on 23 September 2015.
Pregovori su uspješno zaključeni parafiranjem Sporazuma 23. rujna 2015.
Done at Luxembourg, 10 October 2016.
Sastavljeno u Luxembourgu 10. listopada 2016.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/601
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2018/601
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a), thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 207. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 6. točkom (a),
In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2018/600, the Agreement was signed on 3 July 2017.
Sporazum bi trebalo odobriti,
The purpose of the Agreement is to establish the legal basis for a cooperation framework which aims to secure the supply chain and facilitate legitimate trade, as well as enable the exchange of information to ensure the proper application of customs legislation and the prevention, investigation and combating of breaches of customs legislation.
DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
The Agreement should be approved,
Članak 1.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Sporazum između Europske unije i Novog Zelanda o suradnji i uzajamnoj administrativnoj pomoći u carinskim pitanjima odobrava se u ime Unije.
Article 1
Tekst Sporazuma priložen je ovoj Odluci.
The Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Članak 2.
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.
Predsjednik Vijeća u ime Unije šalje obavijest predviđenu u članku 21. stavku 1.
Article 2
Sporazuma.
The President of the Council shall give, on behalf of the Union, the notification provided for in Article 21(1) of the Agreement.
Članak 3.
R. Porodzanov
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2018/600 od 10. listopada 2016. o potpisivanju, u ime Europske unije, Sporazuma između Europske unije i Novog Zelanda o suradnji i uzajamnoj administrativnoj pomoći u carinskim pitanjima (vidjeti stranicu 3. ovog Službenog lista).
Consent of 13 March 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Glavno tajništvo Vijeća objavit će datum stupanja na snagu Sporazuma u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/600 of 10 October 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (see page 3 of this Official Journal).
Pregovori su uspješno zaključeni parafiranjem Sporazuma 23. rujna 2015.
The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
U skladu s Odlukom Vijeća (EU) 2018/600, Sporazum je potpisan 3. srpnja 2017.
On 27 May 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, which sets out restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).
Vijeće je 27. svibnja 2016. donijelo Odluku (ZVSP) 2016/849 kojom se utvrđuju mjere ograničavanja protiv Demokratske Narodne Republike Koreje (DNRK).
Four persons who provided for the transfer of assets or resources that could financially contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes should be added to the list of persons and entities in Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849.
Na popis osoba i subjekata u Prilogu II.
Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Odluci (ZVSP) 2016/849 trebalo bi dodati četiri osobe koje su osigurale prijenos imovine ili izvora koji bi mogli financijski doprinijeti programima DNRK-a povezanima s nuklearnim oružjem, balističkim projektilima ili drugim oružjem za masovno uništavanje.
Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Prilog II.
Done at Brussels, 19 April 2018.
Odluci (ZVSP) 2016/849 mijenja se kako je navedeno u Prilogu ovoj Odluci.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP (OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79).
Za Vijeće
Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 is amended as follows:
Odluka Vijeća (ZVSP) 2016/849 od 27. svibnja 2016. o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Demokratske Narodne Republike Koreje i o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 2013/183/ZVSP (SL L 141, 28.5.2016., str. 79.).
heading II is replaced by the following:
PRILOG
Persons and entities providing financial services or the transfer of assets or resources that could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes’;
Prilog II.
under heading II, the following entries are added under the subheading ‘A. Persons’:
Odluci (ZVSP) 2016/849 mijenja se kako slijedi:
Name
Naslov II. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Alias
Osobe i subjekti koji pružaju financijske usluge ili osiguravaju prijenos imovine ili izvora koji bi mogli doprinijeti programima DNRK-a povezanima s nuklearnim oružjem, balističkim projektilima ili drugim oružjem za masovno uništavanje”.
Identifying information
Pod naslovom II., sljedeći unosi dodaju se pod podnaslovom „A. Osobe”:
Date of designation
Ime
DOB: 2.12.1947
Identifikacijski podaci
POB: Sinuju, DPRK
Datum uvrštenja na popis
KIM Yong Nam has been identified by the Panel of Experts as an agent of the Reconnaissance General Bureau, an entity which has been designated by the United Nations.
Obrazloženje
He and his son KIM Su Gwang have been identified by the Panel of Experts as engaging in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
Datum rođenja: 2.12.1947.
KIM Yong Nam has opened various current and savings accounts in the Union and has been involved in various large bank transfers to bank accounts in the Union or to accounts outside the Union while working as a diplomat, including to accounts in the name of his son KIM Su Gwang and daughter-in-law KIM Kyong Hui.
Mjesto rođenja: Sinuju, DNRK
DOB: 11.5.1950
Povjerenstvo stručnjaka identificiralo je KIMA Yonga Nama kao agenta Glavnog ureda za prikupljanje obavještajnih podataka (Reconnaissance General Bureau), subjekta koji su Ujedinjeni narodi uvrstili na popis.
POB: Kangwon
Povjerenstvo stručnjaka identificiralo je da su on i njegov sin KIM Su Gwang uključeni u obmanjujuće financijske prakse kojima bi se moglo doprinijeti programima DNRK-a povezanima s nuklearnim oružjem, balističkim projektilima ili drugim oružjem za masovno uništavanje.
DJANG Tcheul Hy has been involved together with her husband KIM Yong Nam, her son KIM Su Gwang and her daughter-in-law KIM Kyong Hui in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
Dok je radio kao diplomat KIM Yong Nam otvorio je razne tekuće i štedne račune u Uniji te je bio uključen u razne velike bankovne doznake na bankovne račune unutar Unije ili na račune izvan Unije, među ostalim na račune koji glase na njegovog sina KIMA Sua Gwanga i snahu KIM Kyong Hui.
She was the owner of several bank accounts in the Union which were opened by her son KIM Su Gwang in her name.
Datum rođenja: 11.5.1950.
She was also involved in several bank transfers from accounts from her daughter-in-law KIM Kyong Hui to bank accounts outside the Union.
Mjesto rođenja: Kangwon
DOB: 18.8.1976
DJANG Tcheul Hy bila je uz svojeg muža KIMA Yonga Nama, sina KIMA Sua Gwanga i snahu KIM Kyong Hui uključena u obmanjujuće financijske prakse kojima bi se moglo doprinijeti programima DNRK-a povezanima s nuklearnim oružjem, balističkim projektilima ili drugim oružjem za masovno uništavanje.
POB: Pyongyang, DPRK
Bila je vlasnica više bankovnih računa u Uniji koje je njezin sin KIM Su Gwang otvorio u njezino ime.
Diplomat, DPRK Embassy Belarus
Također je bila uključena u nekoliko bankovnih doznaka s računa njezine snahe KIM Kyong Hui na bankovne račune izvan Unije.
KIM Su Gwang has been identified by the Panel of Experts as an agent of the Reconnaissance General Bureau, an entity which has been designated by the United Nations.
Datum rođenja: 18.8.1976.
He and his father KIM Yong Nam have been identified by the Panel of Experts as engaging in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
Mjesto rođenja: Pjongjang, DNRK
KIM Su Gwang has opened multiple bank accounts in several Member States, including under family members' names.
Diplomat u Veleposlanstvu DNRK-a u Bjelarusu
He has been involved in various large bank transfers to bank accounts in the Union or to accounts outside the Union while working as a diplomat, including to accounts in the name of his spouse KIM Kyong Hui.
Povjerenstvo stručnjaka identificiralo je KIMA Sua Gwanga kao agenta Glavnog ureda za prikupljanje obavještajnih podataka (Reconnaissance General Bureau), subjekta koji su Ujedinjeni narodi uvrstili na popis.
DOB: 6.5.1981
Povjerenstvo stručnjaka identificiralo je da su on i njegov otac KIM Yong Nam uključeni u obmanjujuće financijske prakse kojima bi se moglo doprinijeti programima DNRK-a povezanima s nuklearnim oružjem, balističkim projektilima ili drugim oružjem za masovno uništavanje.
KIM Kyong Hui has been involved together with her husband KIM Su Gwang, her father-in-law KIM Yong Nam and her mother-in-law DJANG Tcheul Hy in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
KIM Su Gwang otvorio je više bankovnih računa u nekoliko država članica, među ostalim pod imenima članova obitelji.
She received several bank transfers from her husband KIM Su Gwang and father-in-law KIM Yong Nam, and transferred money to accounts outside the Union in her name or the name of her mother-in-law, DJANG Tcheul Hy.’
Dok je radio kao diplomat bio je uključen u razne velike bankovne doznake na bankovne račune unutar Unije ili na račune izvan Unije, među ostalim na račune koji glase na njegovu suprugu KIM Kyong Hui.
of 7 April 2016
оd 7. travnja 2016.
on State aid SA.28876 - 2012/C (ex CP 202/2009) implemented by Greece for Container Terminal Port of Piraeus
o državnoj potpori SA.28876 – 2012/C (ex CP 202/2009) koju je provela Grčka u korist lučkog terminala za kontejnere u Pireju
On 23 March 2015, the Commission adopted a final decision (‘final decision’) with which it concluded that Greece had unlawfully put into effect in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, incompatible aid measures in favour of Piraeus Container Terminal S.A (‘PCT’) and its mother company and creditor, Cosco Pacific Limited (‘Cosco’), and ordered the abolition and the recovery of the aid measures concerned.
Komisija je 23. ožujka 2015. donijela konačnu odluku („konačna odluka”) u kojoj je zaključila da je Grčka nezakonito i protivno članku 108. stavku 3.
On 2 June 2015, Greece appealed the final decision before the General Court of the European Union.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije provela nespojive mjere potpore u korist društva Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. („PCT”) i njegova matičnog društva i vjerovnika Cosco Pacific Limited („Cosco”) te je naredila ukidanje mjera i povrat potpore dodijeljene predmetnim mjerama.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
Grčka je 2. lipnja 2015. uložila žalbu na konačnu odluku pred Općim sudom Europske unije.
The final decision
DETALJAN OPIS MJERE
In 2009 the Commission received complaints concerning several fiscal measures granted by law 3755/2009 (‘the Law’) to the concession holder of a part of the Port of Piraeus, Cosco and its subsidiary PCT.
Konačna odluka
On 11 July 2012 the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure raising doubts concerning these tax exemptions (‘opening decision’).
Komisija je 23. ožujka 2015. okončala službeni istražni postupak u tom predmetu i izrazila stajalište da sljedeće mjere predstavljaju nezakonitu i nespojivu državnu potporu:
On 23 March 2015, the Commission concluded the formal investigation of the case and considered that the following measures constituted unlawful and incompatible State aid:
oslobođenje od plaćanja poreza na dobit na nastale kamate do datuma puštanja u promet pristaništa III;
Exemption from income tax on interest accrued until the date of commencement of operation of pier III;
pravo na povrat PDV-a bez obzira na fazu provedbe predmeta ugovora; definicija pojma „sredstva rada” u svrhe primjene pravila o PDV-u; pravo na zatezne kamate od prvog dana nakon 60. dana od zahtjeva za povrat PDV-a;
Right to VAT credit refund irrespective of the stage of completion of the contract object; definition of the notion of ‘investment good’ for the purposes of VAT rules; right to arrear interests from the first day following the 60th day after the VAT refund request;
prijenos poreznog gubitka bez vremenskog ograničenja;
Loss carry forward without any temporal limitation;
izbor između tri metode amortizacije troškova ulaganja u obnovu pristaništa II. i izgradnju pristaništa III.;
Choice among three depreciation methods concerning the investment costs of the reconstruction of Pier II and the construction of Pier III;
oslobođenje od plaćanja administrativne pristojbe za ugovore o zajmovima i sve dodatne ugovore u vezi s financiranjem projekta;
Exemption from stamp duty on the loan agreements and any ancillary agreements for the funding of the project;
oslobođenje od plaćanja poreza, administrativne pristojbe, doprinosa i drugih prava u korist države ili trećih stranaka u vezi s ugovorima između vjerovnika ugovora o zajmu 8 u skladu s kojima se prenose obveze i prava koja iz njih proizlaze;
Exemption from taxes, stamp duties, contributions and any rights in favour of the State or third parties on the contracts between the creditors of the loan agreements under which are transferred the obligations and rights resulting therefrom;
oslobođenje od plaćanja administrativne pristojbe za bilo koju naknadu koju je Lučka uprava Pireja („PPA”) platila društvu PCT u skladu s ugovorom o koncesiji, koji je izvan područja primjene zakona o PDV-u;
Exemption from stamp duties for any compensation paid by Port Piraeus Authority (‘PPA’) to PCT under the Concession contract, which is outside the scope of the VAT code;
zaštita u skladu s posebnim režimom za strana ulaganja.
Protection under the special regime for foreign investments.
U istoj je odluci Komisija zaključila da Grčka nije dodijelila državnu potporu oslobađanjem društva PCT od primjene pravila o prisilnom izvlaštenju.
In the same decision the Commission concluded that Greece did not grant State aid by exempting PCT from rules concerning forced expropriation.
Mjera koja se ocjenjuje: oslobođenje od plaćanja administrativne pristojbe za naknade koje je društvo PPA plaćalo društvu PCT
The measure under assessment: stamp duty exemption for compensations paid by PPA to PCT
U pogledu oslobođenja od plaćanja administrativne pristojbe za naknade koje je društvo PPA plaćalo društvu PCT, Komisija je u konačnoj odluci zaključila da je njime pružena selektivna prednost PCT-u zato što je oslobođen plaćanja administrativnih pristojbi u slučaju: a) naknade koju plaća društvo PPA zbog aktivacije kaznene odredbe u ugovoru o koncesiji i b) drugih vrsta naknade koje plaća društvo PPA, kao što su odštete povezane s ugovorom o koncesiji ili naknade za međunarodne povrede ugovora o koncesiji.
Regarding the exemption from stamp duty for compensations paid by PPA to PCT, in the final decision, the Commission concluded that it entailed a selective advantage in favour of PCT in that it alleviated it from the payment of stamp duties in the case of: (a) compensation paid by PPA due to the activation of a penalty clause of the concession contract, and (b) other types of compensation paid by PPA, such as for damages related to the concession contract or for international breach of contract.
Kad je konkretno riječ o slučaju naknade koju je platilo društvo PPA zbog aktivacije kaznene odredbe (tj. slučaj pod točkom (a) u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi), Komisija je zaključila da se prednost dodijeljena društvu PCT sastojala od toga što je u takvim slučajevima bilo oslobođeno od plaćanja fiksne administrativne pristojbe u takvim slučajevima.
Concerning in particular the case of compensation paid by PPA due to the activation of a penalty clause (i.e. under (a) in the immediately above recital) the Commission concluded that the advantage conferred to PCT consisted in its alleviation from the payment of a fixed stamp duty in such cases.
Taj se zaključak temeljio na tome da se, u skladu s opće primjenjivim okvirom, odnosno Zakona o administrativnim pristojbama kako ga se tumači u kružnom dopisu 44/1987, za aktivaciju dodatnog ugovora povezanog s ugovorom koji podliježe PDV-u plaća fiksna administrativna pristojba.
This conclusion was based on the consideration that according to the generally applicable framework, i.e. the stamp duty code as interpreted by circular 44/1987, the activation of an ancillary agreement related to a contract subject to VAT is subject to a fixed stamp duty.
Grčka je, međutim, u zahtjevu za poništenje konačne odluke pred Općim sudom navela da su fiksne administrativne pristojbe načelno ukinute od 2001., odnosno prije nego što je zakonom 3755/2009 uvedeno predmetno oslobođenje u korist društva PCT.
However, in its application for annulment of the final decision before the General Court, Greece indicated that fixed stamp duties have been generally abolished since 2001, i.e. before law 3755/2009 introduced the relevant exemption in favour of PCT.
OCJENA MJERE
ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURE
Tijekom upravnog postupka koji je doveo do donošenja konačne odluke grčka tijela ni u jednom trenutku nisu Komisiji skrenula pozornost na činjenicu da su fiksne administrativne pristojbe ukinute od 2001. na temelju članka 25.
During the administrative procedure that led to the final decision, the Greek authorities never brought to the Commission's attention the fact that fixed stamp duties have been abolished since 2001, by virtue of Article 25 of law 2873/2000.
Zakona 2873/2000.
The Greek authorities never mentioned this fact, although the opening decision had opened the formal investigation procedure of Article 108(2) TFEU with respect to the exemption of PCT from stamp duties in general (including fixed and proportional stamp duties), provided to PCT on the basis of Article 2(10) of the Law.
Grčka tijela nikad nisu spomenula tu činjenicu iako je odlukom o pokretanju postupka otvoren službeni istražni postupak iz članka 108. stavka 2.
Therefore, on the basis of the information available to the Commission when the final decision was adopted, the Commission was entitled to conclude that Article 2(10) of the Law granted incompatible State aid to PCT by exempting it from both fixed and proportional stamp duties on compensation paid by PPA to PCT under the concession contract.
UFEU-a u odnosu na potpuno oslobođenje društva PCT od plaćanja administrativnih pristojbi (uključujući fiksne i razmjerne administrativne pristojbe), koje je društvu PCT dodijeljeno na temelju članka 2. stavka 10.
Even if the Greek authorities belatedly informed the Commission on the general abolishment of fixed stamp duties, the Commission, acting as a sound administration and although not obliged to modify the final decision, wishes however to modify that final decision, in order to fully reflect the present situation.
Zakona.
Specifically, in view of Article 25 of law 2873/2000, the Commission has no longer any reason to consider that the exemption of Article 2(10) of the Law confers an advantage to PCT in case PPA pays compensations to PCT due to the activation of a penalty clause of the concession contract.
Stoga je, na temelju informacija dostupnih Komisiji u trenutku donošenja konačne odluke, Komisija imala pravo zaključiti da je člankom 2. stavkom 10. zakona društvu PCT odobrena nespojiva državna potpora time što je izuzeto od plaćanja fiksnih i razmjernih administrativnih pristojbi na naknadu koju je društvo PPA platilo društvu PCT na temelju ugovora o koncesiji.
According to the generally applicable rules for this type of compensation payment, no stamp duty was due at the time law 3755/2009 was adopted.
Iako su grčka tijela kasno obavijestila Komisiju o općem ukidanju fiksnih administrativnih pristojbi, Komisija, kao dobar upravitelj, iako nije obvezna izmijeniti konačnu odluku, ipak tu konačnu odluku želi izmijeniti kako bi u potpunosti odražavala sadašnje stanje.
Therefore, the relevant stamp duty exemption does not confer a selective advantage to PCT and, thus, does not constitute State aid, in this respect.
Konkretno, s obzirom na članak 25. zakona 2873/2000 Komisija više nema razloga smatrati da se oslobođenjem iz članka 2. stavka 10. zakona dodjeljuje prednost društvu PCT u slučaju kad društvo PPA plaća naknade PCT-u zbog aktivacije kaznene odredbe iz ugovora o koncesiji.
As the Commission was only made aware of this information after the adoption of its final decision in this case, within the spirit of good public administration, it now decides to amend its decision of 23 March 2015 as regards this specific advantage of the measure.
U skladu s opće primjenjivim pravilima za tu vrstu plaćene naknade u vrijeme donošenja zakona 3755/2009 nije bila propisana nikakva administrativna pristojba.
The final decision is not in any manner modified with respect to PCT's exemption from the (proportional) stamp duty normally due for other types of compensation paid by PPA (i.e. under (b) in recital 5 of the present decision).
Stoga se predmetnim oslobođenjem od plaćanja administrativne pristojbe ne pruža selektivna prednost društvu PCT te ono u tom smislu ne predstavlja državnu potporu.
CONCLUSION
Budući da je Komisija s tom informacijom upoznata tek nakon donošenja konačne odluke u ovom predmetu, u duhu dobre javne uprave sad odlučuje izmijeniti svoju odluku od 23. ožujka 2015. u odnosu na posebnu prednost koju donosi mjera.
The Commission has accordingly decided that Greece has not granted State aid to PCT in the form of exemption from the payment of stamp duties in case PPA pays compensation to PCT due to the activation of a penalty clause of the concession contract.
Konačna odluka ni na koji se način ne mijenja u pogledu oslobođenja društva PCT od plaćanja (razmjerne) administrativne pristojbe koja je uobičajena za druge vrste naknade koje plaća društvo PPA (tj. slučajevi opisani pod točkom (b) u uvodnoj izjavi (5) ove Odluke).
Therefore, it amends its decision of 23 March 2015 as regards this aspect of the measure.
ZAKLJUČAK
All the other conclusions of the said decision remain the same,
Komisija je u skladu s time odlučila da Grčka nije dodijelila državnu potporu društvu PCT u obliku oslobođenja od plaćanja administrativnih pristojbi u slučaju kad društvo PPA plaća PCT-u naknadu zbog aktivacije kaznene odredbe iz ugovora o koncesiji.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Stoga mijenja svoju odluku od 23. ožujka 2015. u odnosu na taj aspekt te mjere.
Article 1
Svi ostali zaključci iz navedene odluke ostaju nepromijenjeni,
In the seventh numbered point of Article 1 of the Decision in case SA.28876 regarding Container terminal Port Piraeus & Cosco Pacific Limited (OJ L 269, 15.10.2015, p. 93) a second sentence is added:
DONIJELA JE OVU ODLUKU:
‘this measure does not cover compensation to PCT due to the activation of a penalty clause of the Concession contract, where anyway no stamp duty is due;’
Članak 1.
Article 2
U sedmoj točki članka 1.
This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.
Odluke u predmetu SA.28876 u pogledu društava Container terminal Port Piraeus & Cosco Pacific Limited (SL L 269, 15.10.2015., str. 93.) dodaje se druga rečenica: