natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Passenger dependent
Još bi gori bio rezultat drugog scenarija, kada bi zbog nepotpisivanja sporazuma o nagodbi i nastavka sudskih sporova AUA prestao pružati svoje usluge KLU-u.
Total project costs rounded
U tom bi se scenariju novčani tok KFBG-a u budućnosti još više pogoršao.
Project success rounded
S obzirom na ta razmatranja Komisija konstatira da je, za subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu u situaciji u kojoj se KFBG nalazio u listopadu 2005., treći scenarij bio jedini koji ima smisla.
Incentive rounded
Treći scenarij značio je da bi AUA platio dospjele naknade zračne luke, ali ne puni iznos, već samo […] EUR od ukupnog duga koji je iznosio […] EUR.
In preparing the analysis in Table 8, Austria took the following considerations into account.
Subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu uzeo bi u obzir djelomične gubitke naknada zračne luke pri procjeni pozitivnih učinaka sporazuma o nagodbi: sklapanjem sporazuma o nagodbi AUA bi platio gotovo dvije trećine ukupnog duga, što bi dovelo do pozitivnog novčanog toka u budućnosti, a time bi se uklonili problemi likvidnosti KLU-a i istodobno osigurao nastavak redovnih usluga zračnog prijevoza koje AUA pruža na KLU-u.
The analysis presents four different scenarios and their respective financial results for KFBG:
Očekivani diskontirani rezultat trećeg scenarija bio je pozitivan.
the scenario of continuing the agreement with AUA paying the full airport charges as prior to October 2003 (the situation if AUA would have continued to pay the charges);
Stoga Komisija zaključuje da bi iz ex ante perspektive privatni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu potpisao sporazum o nagodbi umjesto da odabere jednu od ostalih alternativa.
the scenario of a complete discontinuation of all services at KLU by AUA;
Komisija zaključuje da je KFBG/DMG pri sklapanju sporazuma o nagodbi s AUA-om djelovao kao subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
the scenario of continuation of the agreement with AUA with application of the 2005 incentive scheme (signing the settlement agreement); and
Stoga odlukom o sklapanju sporazuma o nagodbi AUA-u nije data nikakva gospodrska prednost i odluka ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
the scenario with a continuation of the agreement with AUA continuing to pay only part of the airport charges due (the situation without signing the settlement agreement).
UFEU-a.
The Commission takes note, that only the last three scenarios were possible alternatives for KFBG in the situation of the litigations with AUA, as the first scenario was only of theoretical nature.
Sporazumi s Ryanairom, LV-om i AMS-om iz 2002.
Out of these three scenarios however only the third scenario seemed to be a reasonable alternative for a MEO being in the situation of KFBG.
Pružanje tih usluga gospodarska je djelatnost.
In the fourth scenario in which KFBG would not have signed the settlement agreement and AUA would have continued to pay only part of the airport charges, the financial situation of KFBG and its liquidity would have further deteriorated.
Ryanair, LV i AMS stoga su poduzetnici u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
In comparison with the other scenarios the scenario four would have led to a clear negative cash flow for the future of KFBG.
UFEU-a.
Even worse would have been the result in scenario two, in case AUA would have discontinued its services to KLU as a result of not signing the settlement agreement and continuation of the litigations.
Za kriterije za procjenu postojanja državnih sredstava i mogućnost pripisivanja državi vidjeti uvodne izjave od 224. do 232.
In this scenario the cash flow would have been even worse for KFBG for the future.
Komisija napominje da je KFBG/DMG u 100-postotnom vlasništvu države.
In light of these considerations, the Commission notes that the third scenario was the only reasonable scenario to choose for a MEO in the situation of KFBG in October 2005.
Do 2003. dionice KFBG/DMG-a bile su u vlasništvu Republike Austrije (60 %), pokrajine Koruške (20 %) i grada Klagenfurta (20 %).
The third scenario meant that AUA would pay the airport charges due, but not the full amount, i.e. only EUR […] of the total debt of EUR […].
U travnju 2003. pokrajina Koruška preuzela je dionice Republike Austrije.
A MEO would have taken the partial losses of the airport charges into account in evaluating the positive effects of the settlement agreement: Due to the settlement agreement nearly two thirds of the total debt would be paid by AUA, leading to a positive cash flow in the future, removing the liquidity problems of KLU and assuring at the same time the continuation of the regular air services of AUA at KLU.
Stoga su od 2003. dionice bile u vlasništvu pokrajine Koruške (80 %) i grada Klagenfurta (20 %).
The expected discounted result of the third scenario was positive.
KFBG/DMG stoga se mora smatrati javnim poduzećem u smislu članka 2. točke (b) Direktive Komisije 2006/111/EZ čija su sredstva državna sredstva.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that from an ex ante perspective, a private MEO would have signed the settlement agreement instead of choosing one of the other alternatives.
Državi se mogu pripisati i sporazumi s Ryanairom, AMS-om i LV-om iz 2002.
The Commission finds that KFBG/DMG acted like a MEO in concluding the settlement agreement with AUA.
Prvo, to je izjavila Austrija u objašnjenju da je pokrajina Koruška bila uključena u sklapanje svih tržišnih sporazuma između KFBG/DMG-a i zračnih prijevoznika.
Therefore, the decision to conclude the settlement agreement did not grant AUA any economic advantage and does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Općenito, pokrajina Koruška bila je informirana o razvoju svih sporazuma preko upravnog odbora i nadzornog odbora KFBG-a i DMG-a.
The 2002 agreements with Ryanair, LV and AMS
Pokrajina Koruška smatrala je da je sklapanje različitih sporazuma bilo u interesu Koruške.
Ryanair provides air transport services.
Drugo, pokrajina Koruška financirala je troškove marketinga proizašle iz tržišnih sporazuma sklopljenih od strane KFBG/DMG-a.
LV and AMS provide marketing services.
Austrija je izričito potvrdila tu uključenost i s obzirom na sporazume s Ryanairom i AMS-om iz 2002.
Providing such services is an economic activity.
To sudjelovanje i uključenost vlade u sporazume iz 2002. dodatno potvrđuju zapisnici sa sastanaka vlade pokrajine Koruške na kojima se raspravljalo o sklapanju sporazuma o zračnim uslugama i o sporazumima o marketingu.
Ryanair, LV and AMS therefore constitute undertakings within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Nadalje, troškove tih sporazuma iz 2002. snosili su pokrajina Koruška i grad Klagenfurt (vidjeti odjeljak 7.1.), a to je državno financiranje dogovoreno prije sklapanja sporazuma sa zračnim prijevoznikom i zahtijevalo je da pokrajina Koruška barem implicitno odobri sporazume.
For the criteria used to assess the existence of State resources and imputability to the State reference is made to recitals 224 to 232.
Organizacijska struktura i lanac utjecaja daljnji su pokazatelji mogućnosti pripisivanja sklapanja paketa sporazuma državi.
The Commission notes that KFBG/DMG are owned 100 % by the State.
Kako je opisano u uvodnim izjavama od 228. do 232., odluke pokrajine Koruške i grada Klagenfurta mogu se pripisati državi.
Until 2003 the shares of KFBG/DMG were held by the Republic of Austria 60 %, the State of Carinthia 20 % and Klagenfurt city 20 %.
Oba dioničara KFBG-a imenovala su nadzorni odbor KFBG/DMG-a (koji je pak imenovao upravu), a kao rezultat toga sastav nadzornog odbora (i uprave) KFBG-a odražavao je odnos snaga političkih stranaka zastupljenih u parlamentu pokrajine Koruške.
In April 2003 the State of Carinthia took over the shares of the Republic of Austria.
Budući da su pokrajina Koruška i grad Klagenfurt jedini dioničari KFBG/DMG-a i imenuju nadzorne odbore KFBG/DMG-a (koji pak imenuju upravu), može se pretpostaviti da imaju dominantan utjecaj nad KFBG/DMG-om i da mogu kontrolirati njegova sredstva.
Since 2003 the shares were therefore held by the State of Carinthia 80 % and Klagenfurt city 20 %.
Pri sklapanju sporazuma s Ryanairom KFBG je aktivno zastupao interes pokrajine Koruške u postojanju i očuvanju održive i uspješne zračne luke u Klagenfurtu za pokrajinu Korušku.
KFBG/DMG must thus be considered public undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Commission Directive 2006/111/EC whose funds are State resources.
Austrija je potvrdila da se sporazumi koje je KFBG/DMG sklopio s Ryanairom i njegovim društvima kćerima mogu pripisati pokrajini Koruški u smislu sudske prakse u predmetu Stardust Marine.
The 2002 agreements with Ryanair, AMS and LV are also imputable to the State.
S obzirom na ta razmatranja, Komisija smatra da postoji dovoljno pokazatelja kako bi se utvrdilo da se sklapanje sporazuma iz 2002. između KFBG/DMG-a i Ryanaira/LV-a/AMS-a može pripisati državi.
First, this was declared by Austria with the explanation that the State of Carinthia was involved in the conclusion of all marketing agreements between KFBG/DMG and the airlines.
Primjena načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu na sporazume s Ryanairom, LV-om i AMS-om iz 2002.
More generally, the State of Carinthia was kept informed about the evolution related to all agreements via the management and supervisory boards of KFBG and DMG.
S obzirom na primjenu načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu upućuje se na opis u uvodnim izjavama od 261. do 278.
The State of Carinthia saw the conclusion of the different agreements as being in the interest of Carinthia.
U svrhu primjene tog načela i uzimajući u obzir činjenice o okolnostima ovog predmeta, Komisija smatra da najprije treba odgovoriti na sljedeća pitanja:
Second, the State of Carinthia financed the marketing costs occurred through the marketing agreements concluded by KFBG/DMG.
Bi li sporazum o marketinškim uslugama i sporazum o uslugama zračne luke trebalo analizirati zajedno ili odvojeno?
Austria also explicitly confirmed this involvement with reference to the 2002 agreements with Ryanair and AMS.
Koje bi koristi pretpostavljeni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji djeluje umjesto KFBG/DMG-a mogao očekivati od sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama?
This participation and involvement of the government in the 2002 agreements is further confirmed by the minutes of the meetings of the government of the State of Carinthia, in which the conclusion of the air service agreements as well as the marketing agreements were discussed.
Za potrebe primjene načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu, koliko je relevantna usporedba uvjeta sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke na koji se upućuje u formalnom istražnom postupku s naknadama zračne luke koje naplaćuju druge zračne luke?
As described in recitals 228 to 232, the decisions of the State of Carinthia and the city of Klagenfurt were imputable to the State.
Komisija smatra da se pri primjeni testa subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu dvije vrste mjera obuhvaćenih službenom istragom u ovom predmetu, odnosno sporazum o uslugama zračne luke i tri sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama, moraju evaluirati zajedno, kao jedna mjera.
Both shareholders of KFBG appointed the supervisory board of KFBG/DMG (which in turn appointed the management) with the result that the supervisory board (and management) of KFBG also represented the proportions of the political parties represented in the government of the State of Carinthia.
Taj se pristup odnosi na sporazum o uslugama zračne luke između Ryanaira i KFBG-a s jedne strane i sporazume o marketinškim uslugama između DMG-a i LV-a te AMS-a s druge strane.
The state of Carinthia and the city of Klagenfurt, as the sole shareholders of KFBG/DMG and by appointing the supervisory boards of KFBG/DMG (which in turn appoint the management), can be presumed to have a dominant influence over KFBG/DMG, and can control its resources.
Postoji nekoliko naznaka koje upućuju na to da bi te sporazume trebalo evaluirati kao jednu mjeru jer su sklopljeni u okviru jedne transakcije.
When concluding the agreements with Ryanair, KFBG also actively represented the State of Carinthia's interest in the existence and maintenance of a viable and performing airport at Klagenfurt for the State of Carinthia.
Prvo, ugovore su u biti sklopile iste stranke:
Austria confirmed that the agreements concluded between KFBG/DMG and Ryanair and its subsidiaries are imputable to the State of Carinthia in the sense of the Stardust Marine jurisprudence.
LV je društvo kći u 100-postotnom vlasništvu Ryanaira.
In the light of these considerations, the Commission considers that there are sufficient indicators to find that the conclusion of the 2002 agreements between KFBG/DMG and Ryanair/LV/AMS are imputable to the State.
Dva sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama u ime LV-a potpisao je Sean Coyle, direktor LV-a koji je obnašao i nekoliko rukovodećih funkcija u Ryanairu, konkretno bio je direktor prihoda od redovnih linija te voditelj odabira linija, profitabilnosti, strategije mreže, raspodjele kapaciteta, odnosa s ulagačima i komercijalni direktor.
Application of the Market Economy Operator Principle to the 2002 agreements with Ryanair, LV and AMS
Za potrebe primjene pravila o državnim potporama, LV i Ryanair smatraju se jednim poduzetnikom, u smislu da LV djeluje kao posrednik u interesu Ryanaira i pod njegovom kontrolom.
With regard to the application of the MEO principle reference is made to the description at recitals 261 to 278 above.
To se može zaključiti i na temelju činjenice da se u preambulama dvaju sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama navodi da „DMG želi imenovati LV […] radi pružanja usluga redovnog zračnog prijevoza putnika na novim linijama s lokacija u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini i/ili kontinentalnoj Europi upotrebom modernog ekološki prihvatljivog mlaznog zrakoplova s kapacitetom od najmanje 140 sjedala (‚Usluge’)”.
In order to apply this principle, taking into account the facts of this case, the Commission considers that the first step should be to address the following issues:
U prvom tržišnom sporazumu od 22. siječnja 2002. navodi se i da bi se „obavljanje Usluga trebalo nastaviti sa 348 povratnih letova godišnje (87 povratnih letova po tromjesečju), s učinkom od […]”.
whether the marketing services agreement and the airport services agreements should be analysed separately or together,
Te izjave pokazuju u kojoj su mjeri ti sporazumi o marketingu međusobno povezani sa sporazumom o uslugama zračne luke između Ryanaira i KFBG-a.
what benefits a hypothetical MEO acting in place of KFBG/DMG could have expected to gain from marketing services agreements,
I AMS je društvo kći u 100-postotnom vlasništvu Ryanaira.
the relevance, for the purposes of applying the MEO principle, of comparing the terms of the airport services agreements referred to in the formal investigation procedure with the airport charges billed at other airports.
Sporazum o marketinškim uslugama u ime AMS-a je potpisao Eddie Wilson, direktor AMS-a koji je obnašao i rukovodeće funkcije u Ryanairu, konkretno bio je direktor za osoblje i uslugu u zrakoplovu.
After addressing the above issues, the next step for the Commission will be to apply the MEO principle to the 2002 agreements with Ryanair, LV and AMS.
Za potrebe primjene pravila o državnim potporama, društvo AMS i Ryanair smatraju se jednim poduzetnikom u smislu da društvo AMS djeluje kao posrednik u interesu Ryanaira i pod njegovom kontrolom.
Regarding an analysis of the marketing services agreements and the airport services agreement together
Kad je riječ o ovom sporazumu, to se može zaključiti i iz činjenice da se u preambuli sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama nekoliko puta upućuje na web-mjesto Ryanaira: „DMG želi imenovati AMS radi uspostave internetskih poveznica na vrlo uspješno web-mjesto za putovanja – www.ryanair.com. […] AMS je uspješno razvio i nastavlja upravljati web-mjestom za putovanja www.ryanair.com. […] su stranke odlučile što uključuje upotrebu web-mjesta www.ryanair.com kao marketinškog alata […].”
The Commission considers that in applying the MEO test, two types of measures covered by the formal investigation in this case, namely the airports service agreement and the three marketing services agreements, must be evaluated together as one single measure.
Iz tih se izjava može vidjeti identičan interes AMS-a i Ryanaira u tom sporazumu.
First of all, the contracts were entered into by essentially the same parties:
Kontrolni utjecaj nad KFBG/DMG-om u tom je pogledu imala pokrajina Koruška.
The two marketing services agreements were signed on behalf of LV by Mr Sean Coyle, director of LV who had also a number of managerial positions at Ryanair such as director of scheduled revenue as well as head of route selection, profitability, network strategy, capacity allocation, investor relations and commercial director.
Kad je riječ o poslovnom odnosu između Ryanaira i KFBG-a s jedne te LV-a i DMG-a s druge strane, Komisija smatra da su interesi KFBG-a i DMG-a da sklope odgovarajuće sporazume konvergirali u vrlo velikoj mjeri: oba su društva bila zainteresirana za povećanje prometa u zračnoj luci i nije bilo važno hoće li KFBG sklopiti oba ugovora ili će sporazum o marketingu umjesto toga sklopiti DMG.
For the purpose of the application of State aid rules, LV and Ryanair are considered to be a single undertaking, in the sense that LV acts as an intermediary in the interest and under the control of Ryanair.
U tom svjetlu, činjenica da je sporazum o uslugama zračne luke sklopljen s KFBG-om, a sporazum o marketinškim uslugama s njegovim ovisnim društvom kćeri, ne utječe na to da se sporazumi mogu procjenjivati kao jedna poslovna transakcija.
This can also be inferred from the fact that the two marketing services agreements state in their preamble that ‘DMG wishes to appoint LV to […] provide new scheduled passenger air services from locations within the United Kingdom and/or continental Europe to using environmentally-friendly modern jet aircraft with a capacity of not less than 140 sets (‘the Services’)’.
Drugo, četiri sporazuma sklopljena su istodobno, jer sva četiri sporazuma potpisana su 22. siječnja 2002.
The first marketing agreement of 22 January 2002 also states that ‘Operation of the Services should continue to be 348 rotations per annum (87 rotations per quarter) with effect from […].’
Četvrto, prema prvom tržišnom sporazumu „ako bi usluge zračne luke pale ispod navedene minimalne razine u bilo kojem tromjesečju, DMG ima pravo bez odgode obavijestiti LV u pisanom obliku da namjerava obustaviti plaćanje iznosa […] i da se ovaj sporazum raskida bez odgode ako se razina usluge ne vrati na tu najmanju razinu u tom tromjesečju […]”.
These statements demonstrate how strongly these marketing agreements are interlinked with the airport services agreement between Ryanair and KFBG.
To opet pokazuje da su sporazum o marketinškim uslugama i sporazum o uslugama zračne luke neodvojivo povezani.
AMS is also a 100 % subsidiary of Ryanair.
Peto, iz zapisnika sa sastanaka vlade pokrajine Koruške može se vidjeti da je pokrajina Koruška razmatrala potpisivanje različitih sporazuma kao jednu operaciju.
The marketing services agreement was signed on behalf of AMS by Mr Eddie Wilson, director of AMS who had also managerial positions at Ryanair such as director of personnel and in-flight.
Odluka o sklapanju sporazuma o marketingu s LV-om i AMS-om bila je izravno povezana s odlukom o sklapanju sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke s Ryanairom.
For the purpose of the application of State aid rules, AMS and Ryanair are considered to be a single undertaking, in the sense that AMS acts as an intermediary in the interest and under the control of Ryanair.
Zaključno, sporazumi o marketinškim uslugama koje su sklopili DMG i LV te AMS neodvojivo su povezani sa sporazumom o uslugama zračne luke koji su potpisali Ryanair i KFBG.
For this agreement, this can also be inferred from the fact that the marketing services agreement refers in its preamble several times to the website of Ryanair: ‘DMG wishes to appoint AMS to provide internet links to the highly successful travel website www.ryanair.com. […] AMS has successfully developed and continues to operate the travel website www.ryanair.com. […] the parties have decided involving the use of the www.ryanair.com website as a marketing tool[…].’
Iz prethodnog je jasno da sporazumi o marketinškim uslugama ne bi bili potpisani bez sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke.
These statements show the identical interest of AMS and Ryanair in this agreement.
U sporazumima o marketinškim uslugama doista se izričito navodi da se oni temelje na novoj usluzi zračnog prijevoza putnika od Ujedinjene Kraljevine do Klagenfurta, i u biti se predviđaju marketinške usluge upotrebom web-mjesta za putovanja www.ryanair.com u cilju promicanja te usluge.
DMG is a 100 % subsidiary of KFBG.
Istodobno se čini da je i sklapanje sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke bilo usko povezano sa sporazumima o marketinškim uslugama: kao obveze Ryanaira na temelju sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke navodi se da „Ryanair zajedno s DMG-om izrađuje periodični plan marketinga za usluge o kojem se raspravlja i o kojem se informira KLU […], uz povezivanje odgovarajućih turističkih web-mjesta s web-mjestom Ryanaira i inkorporiranje odgovarajućih logotipa kad god je to izvedivo”.
As it was noted in recital 313 et seq., the decisions of KFBG to conclude airport services agreements with airlines such as Ryanair were imputable to the State.
Ova izjava jasno povezuje sporazum o uslugama zračne luke s sporazumima o marketingu između DMG-a i AMS-a te LV-a od istog datuma.
The controlling influence over KFBG/DMG was, in this regard, exercised by the State of Carinthia.
Ti elementi različitih sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama pokazuju da su marketinške usluge navedene u tim sporazumima usko povezane, i u pogledu njihova trajanja i u pogledu njihove prirode, s uslugama zračnog prijevoza koje nudi Ryanair, koje su navedene u sporazumima o marketinškim uslugama te su predmet odgovarajućeg sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke.
Considering, however, that it was always the State of Carinthia which appointed KFBG's and DMG's supervisory boards, and that the State of Carinthia effectively financed part of the losses of KFBG/DMG (thereby having significant influence on both and a larger financial interest in these undertakings), it can safely be considered that the State of Carinthia had effective control over KFBG/DMG.
U sporazumima o marketinškim uslugama čak je navedeno da proizlaze iz obveze društva Ryanair da upravlja predmetnim uslugama prijevoza.
As regards the commercial relationship between Ryanair and KFBG on the one hand, and LV and DMG on the other hand, the Commission finds that the interest of KFBG and DMG in entering into the respective agreements converged to a very large degree: both were interested in increasing traffic at the Airport, and it made little difference whether KFBG concluded both contracts or whether DMG concluded the marketing contract instead.
Sporazumi o marketinškim uslugama stoga su neodvojivi od sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke čije odjeke sadržavaju i u kojem je njihova svrha.
In this light, the fact that the airport service agreement was concluded with KFBG while the marketing services agreement was concluded with its dependent subsidiary cannot militate against assessing the agreements as one commercial transaction.
Iz tih razloga Komisija zajedničku analizu sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke i sporazumâ o marketinškim uslugama od 22. siječnja 2002. smatra primjerenom u cilju utvrđivanja čine li oni državnu potporu.
Second, the four agreements were also all concluded at the same point in time, as they were all four signed on 22 January 2002.
Austrija se u svojim primjedbama na odluku o proširenju postupka složila s pristupom koji je primijenjen u odluci o proširenju postupka da se sporazum o uslugama zračne luke i sporazumi o marketinškim uslugama sklopljeni istodobno analiziraju zajedno.