natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
definition of the ‘reasonable profit’ which can be expected by the operator through payment of public-service compensation;
U stavku 3. istog članka navodi se da trajanje ugovora o javnim uslugama ne smije prelaziti deset godina za usluge autobusnog prijevoza.
incentives to maintain or develop effective management capable of providing services of a high standard.
U stavku 6. istog članka navodi se da ako su operatorima nametnute obveze usklađenja s određenim standardima kvalitete, ti standardi moraju biti jasno izraženi u ugovoru.
The Commission's scrutiny on this point is confined to contribution C2 in the CT2, as contribution C1 does not fall within the scope of the investigation as defined in the opening decision.
U pogledu ugovora CT2 Komisija zaključuje sljedeće:
It is, nevertheless, necessary to explain the relationship between C1 and C2 in order to be able to rule on contribution C2.
ugovor CT2 može se smatrati ugovorom o javnim uslugama ako se, kako je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama 214. i 216., operatoru povjerava upravljanje i obavljanje javne usluge putničkog prijevoza koje su obuhvaćene obvezama obavljanja javne usluge.
The purpose of contribution C1 is to compensate for the operating deficit, calculated as the sum of the operating costs (excluding elements relating to investment, such as depreciation), plus a contractually negotiated margin, and minus all the revenues and operating subsidies.
Tim ugovorom predviđa se dodjela doprinosa C1 i C2 koji su na objektivan i transparentan način definirani u članku 53. ugovora CT2.
Contribution C2, in contrast, is calculated as the sum of depreciation and is, therefore, only intended to cover costs incurred by the requirements to invest laid down in the contract.
Postojanje financijskog izvješća za usluge omogućuje preciznu raspodjelu troškova povezanih s pružanjem usluga.
The method of calculating these two contributions is clearly set out in the CT2 and the annexes thereto, in accordance with recital 256(a).
Zaključuje se da postoji usklađenost s člankom 4. stavkom 1.
According to the information supplied by STIF, routes for which there is a CT2 all show an operating deficit (even before costs relating to investment have been taken into account), so that the C1 contribution is always positive [38].
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
As the revenue and subsidies relating to operation are not enough to cover even a fraction of the annualised investment costs, contribution C2 is in reality equal to the sum of the depreciations (plus the financial costs) recorded in the unified financial account.
Mehanizmi raspodjele prihoda povezanih s prodajom prijevoznih karata vrlo su precizno opisani u članku 50. ugovora CT2.
This distinction makes clear that the definition of ‘reasonable profit’, to use the wording of Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, depends entirely on contribution C1 and not on contribution C2.
Time se potvrđuje usklađenost sa stavkom 2. istog članka.
Recital 256(c) cannot, therefore, apply to contribution C2 considered in isolation.
Ugovor CT2 uključuje standarde kvalitete koji jasno definirani u ugovoru.
It can, on the other hand, be established that contribution C2 cannot in any way overcompensate the transport operator, as it only covers investment costs actually recorded and entered as depreciation in the financial account for each route.
Time se potvrđuje usklađenost sa stavkom 6. istog članka.
As regards recital 256(b), the Commission observes that the existence of this financial account for the service, which is specific to each route for which there is a public-service contract, makes it possible, firstly, to ensure that there is accounting separation from any other activities of the operator and, secondly, to record all the costs and revenue linked to performance of the public service, in line with the principles set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Konačno, u članku 6.
Lastly, as regards recital 256(d), Article 49 of the CT2 lays down that ‘besides the remuneration it receives, the undertaking is subject to incentives, bonuses or penalties linked to its [operational] performance in performing the reference service’.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 i u njezinu Prilogu opisuju se glavna načela na temelju kojih se određuje naknada za javne usluge:
The public-service compensation, of which contribution C2 is a part, is therefore combined with a system of incentives developed enough to ensure that Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 is deemed to be complied with.
način izračuna „neto financijskog učinka” obveze obavljanja javne usluge u pogledu troškova i prihoda operatora javne usluge;
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that contribution C2 in the CT2 complies with the main principles defined in Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 with respect to calculating public-service compensation and hence that it can be declared compatible with the internal market under Article 93 TFEU.
odvojeni računovodstveni prikaz djelatnosti u okviru obveza obavljanja javne usluge obavljanja i onih u komercijalnom poslovanju;
This conclusion, which is limited to contribution C2, is without prejudice to the compatibility of the CT2 contributions as a whole (since contribution C1 is not within the scope of application of this Decision).
definicija „razumne dobiti” koju operator može očekivati kroz isplatu naknade za javne usluge;
CONCLUSION
promicanje očuvanja i razvoja učinkovitog upravljanja u cilju pružanja usluga po zadovoljavajuće visokim standardima.
The investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region through the successive decisions of 1994, 1998 and 2001 constitute State aid implemented unlawfully, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Procjena Komisije u ovoj se točki ograničava na doprinos C1 ugovora CT2 jer doprinos C1 nije obuhvaćen opsegom procjene definiranim u odluci o pokretanju postupka.
However, in view of its compliance with Article 107(3) TFEU, the Commission declares this aid to be compatible with the internal market.
Međutim, potrebno je objasniti povezanost doprinosa C1 i C2 kako bi se mogao donijeti zaključak o doprinosu C2.
The investment subsidies awarded by STIF under Rider No 3 to CT1 constitute State aid implemented unlawfully, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Cilj doprinosa C1 jest nadoknada deficita poslovanja izračunanog kao zbroj troškova poslovanja (osim elemenata povezanih s ulaganjem, poput amortizacije) uvećanog za ugovorenu maržu i umanjenog za sve prihode i subvencije povezane s obavljanjem usluge.
The public-service compensation awarded by STIF in the form of contribution C2 under the CT2 constitutes State aid which, as it does not satisfy certain formal criteria laid down by Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, is not covered by the exemption from the notification requirement granted by that Regulation.
S druge strane, doprinos C2 računa se kao zbroj amortizacije i pokriva samo troškove nastale obvezama ulaganja definiranima ugovorom.
However, in view of its compliance with Article 93 TFEU, the Commission declares this aid to be compatible with the internal market,
Metoda izračuna ovih dvaju doprinosa jasno je opisana u ugovoru CT2 i njegovim prilozima, u skladu s točkom (a) uvodne izjave 256.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Prema podacima koje je podnio STIF sve linije koje su bile predmet ugovora CT2 imale su deficit u poslovanju (prije uračunavanja troškova ulaganja), dok je doprinos C1 uvijek pozitivan [38].
Article 1
Budući da prihodi i subvencije povezane s obavljanjem usluge nisu dovoljni za pokrivanje čak ni dijela godišnjih troškova ulaganja, doprinos C2 u stvarnosti je jednak iznosu amortizacije (uvećanom za troškove financiranja) navedenom u jedinstvenom financijskom izvješću.
The aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 in the form of investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region by way of decisions CR 34-94, CR 44-98 and CR 47-01 is compatible with the internal market.
Iz navedenoga proizlazi da se definicija „razumne dobiti” u skladu s člankom 6.
Article 2
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 u potpunosti odnosi na doprinos C1, a ne na doprinos C2.
The aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France from 2008 onwards in the form of investment subsidies awarded by STIF under Rider No 3 to CT1 is compatible with the internal market.
Prema tome, točka (c) uvodne izjave 256. ne može se primijeniti na doprinos C2 koji se promatra zasebno.
Article 3
Naprotiv, može se ustanoviti da doprinos C2 ni na koji način nije prekomjerna naknada prijevozniku jer pokriva samo troškove ulaganja koji se u financijskom izvješću svake linije smatraju i koji su navedeni kao amortizacija.
The aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France in the form of C2 contributions awarded by STIF under CT2 is compatible with the internal market.
U pogledu točke (b) uvodne izjave 256.
Article 4
Komisija primjećuje da financijsko izvješće usluga, posebno izrađeno za svaku liniju koja je predmet ugovora o javnim uslugama, s jedne strane omogućuje računovodstveno odvajanje djelatnosti koje ne provodi operator, a s druge strane utvrđivanje svih troškova i prihoda povezanih s pružanjem javne usluge u skladu s načelima navedenima u Prilogu Uredbi (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
This decision is addressed to the French Republic.
U pogledu točke (d) uvodne izjave 256. ugovor CT2 predviđa člankom 49. da „osim naknade, poduzeće podliježe podjeli dobiti, bonusima ili kaznama povezanima s poslovanjem u pružanju predmetnih usluga”.
Done at Brussels, 2 February 2017.
Naknada za obavljanje javne usluge, u koju pripada i doprinos C2, ostvaruje se kroz sustav inicijativa koji je dovoljno razvijen da bi se smatralo da je u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
For the Commission
U svjetlu prethodno navedenoga Komisija zaključuje da je doprinos C2 ugovora CT2 spojiv s glavnim načelima definiranima Uredbom (EZ) br. 1370/2007 u pogledu izračuna naknada za obavljanje javne usluge te se stoga može smatrati i spojivim s unutarnjim tržištem na temelju članka 93.
Member of the Commission
UFEU-a.
OJ C 141, 9.5.2014, p. 38.
Ovaj je zaključak ograničen na doprinos C2 te se ne odnosi na spojivost svih naknada ugovora CT2 (doprinos C1 ne ulazi u područje primjene ove odluke).
See footnote 1.
ZAKLJUČAK
Judgment of 6 October 2015 in Case C-303/13P Commission v Jørgen Andersen, ECLI:EU:C:2015:647.
Subvencije za ulaganja koje je regija Île-de-France dodijelila na temelju uzastopnih odluka iz 1994., 1998. i 2001. smatraju se nezakonito provedenom državnom potporom koja krši članak 108. stavak 3.
Report by the Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme d'Île-de-France published in March 2013 and accessible on line: www.omnil.fr/IMG/pdf/la_circulation_routiere_en_idf_en_2010.pdf.
UFEU-a.
Decision CR 34-94 of 20 October 1994 on aid for the improvement of public road transport services operated by private undertakings or undertakings under local authority control.
Međutim, u pogledu njihove usklađenosti s člankom 107. stavkom 3.
Decision CR 79-21 of 10 July 1979.
UFEU-a Komisija izjavljuje da su te potpore spojive s unutarnjim tržištem.
Judgment No 0417015/7-1.
Subvencije za ulaganja koje je STIF dodijelio na temelju Dopune br. 3 ugovora CT1 smatraju se nezakonito provedenom državnom potporom kojom se krši članak 108. stavak 3.
Judgment No 08PA04753.
UFEU-a.
Judgment No 343440.
Naknade za obavljanje javne usluge koje je STIF dodijelio u obliku doprinosa C1 ugovora CT2 smatraju se državnim potporama koje ne ispunjavaju određene uvjete Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 te time nisu izuzete od obveze obavještavanja Komisije.
Judgment No 0817138/2-1.
Međutim,u pogledu njihove usklađenosti s člankom 93.
Judgment No 13PPA03174.
UFEU-a Komisija izjavljuje da su te potpore spojive s unutarnjim tržištem,
Judgment of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
DONIJELA JE SLJEDEĆU ODLUKU:
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Članak 1.
Judgement of 15 June 2000 in Case T-298/97 Alzetta Maura v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2000:151.
Program potpora, koji je Francuska nezakonito provodila u razdoblju od 1994. do 2008. u obliku subvencija za ulaganja, koje je regija Île-de-France dodijelila u okviru odluka CR 34-94, CR 44-98 i CR 47-01, spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem.
Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 156, 28.6.1969, p. 1).
Članak 2.
Decree No 49-1473 of 14 November 1949 on the coordination and harmonisation of rail and road transport.
Program potpora, koji je Francuska nezakonito provodila u razdoblju od 2008. u obliku subvencija za ulaganja, koje je STIF dodijelio u okviru Dopune br. 3 ugovora CT1, spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1) (‘the 1999 Procedural Regulation’).
Članak 3.
Commission Decision 98/693/EC of 1 July 1998 concerning the Spanish Plan Renove Industrial system of aid for the purchase of commercial vehicles (August 1994 — December 1996) (OJ L 329, 5.12.1998, p. 23); Commission Decision 98/182/EC of 30 July 1997 concerning aid granted by the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (Italy) to road haulage companies in the Region (OJ L 66, 6.3.1998, p. 18).
Program potpora, koji je Francuska nezakonito provodila u obliku doprinosa C2, koje je STIF dodijelio u okviru ugovora CT2, spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem.
See, for example, judgment of 6 September 2006 in Case C-88/03 Portugal v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2006:511, paragraphs 56-58.
Članak 4.
See, for example, judgment of 7 March 2012 in Case T-210/02 British Aggregates v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2012:110.
Ova je odluka upućena Francuskoj Republici.
OJ C 184, 22.7.2008, p. 13.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu, 2. veljače 2017.
Commission Decision of 16 April 2008 on State aid N 350/2007 implemented by the Czech Republic in favour of Autobus pořízení.
Za Komisiju
Judgment of 16 March 2004 in Case T-157/01 Danske Busvognmænd v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76.
Članica Komisije
Ibid., paragraph 86.
SL C 141, 9.5.2014. str. 38.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/635 of 15 October 2014 on State aid SA.20580 (C 31/07) (ex NN 17/07) implemented by Ireland for Córas Iompair Éireann Bus Companies (Dublin Bus and Irish Bus) (OJ L 104, 23.4.2015, p.
Vidjeti bilješku br. 1.
17).
Presuda Suda od 6. listopada 2015., Europska komisija protiv Jørgena Andersena, C-303/13P, ECLI:EU:C:2015:647.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9).
Izvješće Instituta za prostorno uređenje i urbanizam regije Île-de-France, objavljeno u ožujku 2013. i dostupno na francuskom jeziku na: www.omnil.fr/IMG/pdf/la_circulation_routiere_en_idf_en_2010.pdf
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87 to 95.
Odluka CR 34-94 regionalnog vijeća regije Île-de-France od 20. listopada 1994. o potpori za poboljšanje usluga javnog cestovnog prijevoza koji obavljaju privatna ili javna poduzeća.
OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 4.
Odluka CR 79-21 od 10. srpnja 1979.
See recital 135 and footnote 21 to this Decision.
Presuda br. 08PA04753
Judgment No 0417015 of the Paris Administrative Court.
Presuda br. 343440
Ruling No 08PA04753 of the Administrative Appeal Court of Paris.
Presuda br. 0817138/2-1
Comments by STIF, paragraph 40.
Presuda br. 13PA03174
Judgment of the Court of 21 July 2016 in Case C-493/14 Dilly's Wellnesshotel GmbH v Finanzamt Linz, ECLI:EU:C:2016:577, paragraph 47.
Uredba (EZ) br. 1370/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. listopada 2007. o uslugama javnog željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza putnika i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba Vijeća (EEZ) br. 1191/69 i (EEZ) br. 1107/70 (SL L 315, 3.12.2007., str. 1).
Judgment of the Court of 12 February 2008 in Case C-199/06 Centre d'exportation du livre français (CELF) and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d'édition (SIDE), ECLI:EU:C:2008:79, paragraph 55.
Presuda Općeg suda od 15. lipnja 2000., Alzetta Maura protiv Komisije, T-298/97, ECLI:EU:T:2000:151.
On average, contribution C1 accounts for 61 % of the operating costs and the contractual profit.
Dekret br. 49-1473 od 14. studenoga 1949. o koordinaciji i usklađivanju željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza.
On average, operating revenue accounts for 31 % of the operating costs and the contractual profit.
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 659/1999 od 22. ožujka 1999. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
The Commission agreed to their request by letter of 14 January 2009.
UFEU-a (SL L 83, 27.3.1999., str. 1.) („postupovna uredba iz 1999.”).
France submitted its comments on 30 April 2014.
(SL L 329, 5.12.1998., str. 23); Odluka Komisije 98/182/EZ od 30. srpnja 1997. o potporama koje je regija Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Italija) dodijelila poduzećima cestovnog prijevoza robe u regiji (SL L 66, 6.3.1998., str. 18.).
The Commission also received comments from seven interested third parties.
Vidjeti npr.
s were signed with 75 private transport undertakings on 13 December 2006 and entered into force on 1 January 2007.
Presudu Suda od 7. ožujka 2012., British Aggregates protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, T-210/02, ECLI:EU:T:2012:110
They followed on from the previous operating agreements, while at the same time paving the way for the transition to the ‘target’ form of contract, the CT2.
SL C 184, 22.7.2008., str. 13.
Under Article 2-1 of the CT1, the object of the contract was to lay down ‘the terms on which the Undertaking would provide the public scheduled passenger transport service by road which it operates in Île-de-France’.
Odluka Komisije od 16. travnja 2008. o državnim potporama br. 350/2007 koje je Češka Republika dodijelila poduzeću Autobus Porizeni.
It laid down the practical arrangements for relations between STIF and the service provider with regard to:
Presuda Suda od 16. ožujka 2004., Danske Busvognmænd protiv Komisije, T-157/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76.
In 1994, the economic sector concerned was closed to competition, as the decisions adopted by the Commission in 1997 and 1998 [18] show.
Ibidem, točka 86.
The criterion concerning the effects on trade between Member States was therefore not satisfied.
Odluka Komisije (EU) 2015/635 od 15. listopada 2014. o državnoj potpori SA.20580 (C 31/07) (ex NN 17/07) koju je pružila Irska za autobusne prijevoznike u sklopu trgovačkog društva Córas Iompair Éireann Bus Companies (Dublin Bus i Irish Bus) (SL L 104, 23.4.2015., str. 17.)..
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 [26] (‘the Procedural Regulation’) defines as an aid scheme ‘any act on the basis of which, without further implementing measures being required, individual aid awards may be made to undertakings defined within the act in a general and abstract manner and any act on the basis of which aid which is not linked to a specific project may be awarded to one or several undertakings for an indefinite period of time and/or for an indefinite amount’.
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 od 13. srpnja 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
It follows from this definition that, in order to distinguish an aid scheme from a set of individual aid measures, the Commission must give particular attention to evaluating how much margin for discretion the authority providing the aid has on a case by case basis.
UFEU-a (SL L 248, 24.9.2015., str. 9.).
Thus, during the first five years, the equipment concerned could be assigned, outside the normal periods of utilisation, to other uses, including uses in the occasional transport market.
Primjedbe STIF-a, točka 40.
In the case of France, it began opening up its market prior to 1995, as early as 1993 [34].
Presuda Suda od 12. veljače 2008., Centre d'exportation du livre français (CELF) i Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication protiv Société internationale de diffusion et d'édition (SIDE), C-199/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:79, točka 55.
The public-service compensation, of which contribution C2 is a part, is therefore combined with a system of incentives developed enough to ensure that Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 is deemed to be complied with.
Ugovori CT1 zaključeni su 13. prosinca 2006. sa 75 privatnih prijevoznika i stupili su na snagu 1. siječnja 2007.
The Region lodged a final appeal against that judgment with the Council of State.
Ti se ugovori nastavljaju na prethodne ugovore o obavljanju prijevoza te služe kao priprema za prijelaz na „ciljni” oblik ugovora, tj. ugovor CT2.
Having regard to Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 [1], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 3(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Odluku br. 406/2009/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. travnja 2009. o naporima koje poduzimaju države članice radi smanjenja emisija stakleničkih plinova s ciljem ostvarenja ciljeva Zajednice vezanih za smanjenje emisija stakleničkih plinova do 2020. godine [1], a posebno njezin članak 3. stavak 2. četvrti podstavak,
After the adoption of Decision 2013/162/EU, Article 6 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 666/2014 [3] required Member States to report greenhouse gas inventories determined in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reporting guidelines on annual inventories as set out in Decision 24/CP.19 of the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC.
Nakon donošenja Odluke 2013/162/EU člankom 6.
Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] requires the Commission to examine the impact of the use of the 2006 IPCC guidelines, or of changes to UNFCCC methodologies used, on the Member State's total greenhouse gas emissions relevant for Article 3 of Decision No 406/2009/EC by December 2016, with a view to ensuring consistency between the methodologies used for the determination of the AEAs and the annual reporting by Member States after the date of that examination.
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 666/2014 [3] zahtijevalo se da države članice izvijeste o inventarima stakleničkih plinova utvrđenima u skladu sa smjernicama za nacionalne inventare stakleničkih plinova IPCC-a iz 2006. i UNFCCC-ovim (Okvirna konvencija Ujedinjenih naroda o promjeni klime) smjernicama za izvješćivanje o godišnjim inventarima kako su utvrđene Odlukom 24/CP.19 Konferencije stranaka UNFCCC-a.
In accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and based on the GHG inventory data as reviewed under Article 19 of that Regulation, the Commission examined the impact of the use of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines, and of changes to UNFCCC methodologies used, on Member State's GHG inventories.
Člankom 27.
The difference in the total greenhouse gas emissions relevant for Article 3 of Decision No 406/2009/EC exceeds 1 % for most Member States.
Uredbe (EU) br. 525/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4] zahtijeva se da Komisija do prosinca 2016. ispita utjecaj korištenja smjernica IPCC-a iz 2006. godine ili značajne promjene korištenih metodologija UNFCCC-a na ukupne emisije stakleničkih plinova države članice koje se odnose na članak 3.
Such revision should be done using the same methodology as the one used for determining the annual emission allocations by Decision 2013/162/EU.
Komisija je u skladu s člankom 27.