natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the opposition is not rejected pursuant to paragraph 1, the Office shall communicate the submission of the opposing party to the applicant and shall invite it to file its observations within a period specified by the Office.
ako se prigovor temelji na nepostojanju suglasnosti nositelja kako je navedeno u članku 8. stavku 3.
Where the applicant submits no observations, the Office shall base its ruling on the opposition on the evidence before it.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaz o tome da je podnositelj prigovora nositelj ranijeg žiga i o njegovom odnosu s trgovačkim zastupnikom ili predstavnikom;
The observations submitted by the applicant shall be communicated to the opposing party who shall be invited, if the Office considers it necessary, to reply within a period specified by the Office.
ako se prigovor temelji na ranijem pravu u smislu članka 8. stavka 4.
Where, after the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party submits facts or evidence that supplement relevant facts or evidence provided within that period and that relate to the same requirement laid down in Article 7(2), the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in deciding whether to accept these supplementing facts or evidence.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaze o uporabi tog prava u trgovačkom prometu koji nema samo lokalni značaj te dokaze o njegovu stjecanju, trajnom postojanju i opsegu zaštite uključujući, ako se poziva na ranije pravo u skladu sa zakonom države članice, jasno navođenje sadržaja nacionalnog zakona na kojem se temelji navođenjem objava relevantnih odredaba ili sudske prakse;
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the facts or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the facts or evidence.
ako se prigovor temelji na ranijoj oznaci izvornosti ili oznaci zemljopisnog podrijetla u smislu članka 8. stavka 4.a Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaze o njihovu stjecanju, trajnom postojanju i opsegu zaštite uključujući, u slučaju pozivanja na raniju oznaku izvornosti ili oznaku zemljopisnog podrijetla u skladu sa zakonom države članice, jasno navođenje sadržaja nacionalnog zakona na kojem se temelji navođenjem objava relevantnih odredaba ili sudske prakse;
The Office shall invite the applicant to submit further observations in response if it deems it appropriate under the circumstances.
ako se prigovor temelji na žigu s ugledom u smislu članka 8. stavka 5.
Where the opposition has not been rejected pursuant to paragraph 1 and the evidence submitted by the opposing party is not sufficient to substantiate the opposition in accordance with Article 7 for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, uz dokaze iz točke (a) ovog stavka, dokaz da žig ima ugled u Uniji ili u predmetnoj državi članici za proizvode ili usluge navedene u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. točkom (g) ove Uredbe te dokaze ili argumente da bi se uporabom žiga za koji se podnosi prijava bez opravdanog razloga neopravdano iskoristio razlikovni karakter ili ugled ranijeg žiga ili bi im to štetilo.
Article 6(2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis after the date on which the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings is deemed to commence.
Ako su dokazi o prijavi ili registraciji ranijih prava iz stavka 2. točke (a) ili, gdje je to primjenjivo, stavka 2. točke (d) ili (e), ili dokazi povezani sa sadržajem nacionalnog zakona dostupni na internetu iz izvora koji Ured priznaje, podnositelj prigovora može dostaviti te dokaze upućivanjem na taj izvor.
Where the applicant wishes to withdraw or restrict the contested application, it shall do so by way of a separate document.
Potvrde o prijavi, registraciji ili produljenju ili jednakovrijedni dokumenti iz stavka 2. točke (a) te sve odredbe primjenjivog nacionalnog zakonodavstva kojim se uređuje stjecanje prava i njihov opseg zaštite, kako je navedeno u stavku 2. točkama (d) i (e), uključujući dokaze dostupne na internetu kako je navedeno u stavku 3., sastavljeni su na jeziku postupka ili popraćeni prijevodom na taj jezik.
In appropriate cases, the Office may invite the parties to limit their observations to particular issues, in which case it shall allow them to raise the other issues at a later stage of the proceedings.
Podnositelj prigovora dostavlja prijevod u roku navedenom za podnošenje izvornog dokumenta.
The Office shall not be required to inform a party of the possibility to produce certain relevant facts or evidence which that party previously failed to produce.
Na sve ostale dokaze koje je podnositelj prigovora dostavio za potkrjepljenje prigovora primjenjuje se članak 24.
Article 9
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.
Multiple oppositions
Prijevodi podneseni nakon isteka relevantnih rokova ne uzimaju se u obzir.
Where a number of oppositions have been entered in respect of the same application for the registration of an EU trade mark, the Office may examine them in one set of proceedings.
Ured ne uzima u obzir pisane podneske, ili njihove dijelove, koji nisu podneseni ili nisu prevedeni na jezik postupka u rokovima koje je Ured utvrdio u skladu sa stavkom 1.
The Office may subsequently decide to examine those oppositions separately.
Članak 8.
Where a preliminary examination of one or more oppositions reveals that the EU trade mark for which an application for registration has been filed may be ineligible for registration in respect of some or all of the goods or services for which registration is sought, the Office may suspend the other opposition proceedings relating to that application.
Ispitivanje prigovora
The Office shall inform the opposing parties affected by the suspension of any relevant decisions taken in the context of those proceedings which are ongoing.
Ako do isteka roka iz članka 7. stavka 1. podnositelj prigovora nije dostavio nikakve dokaze ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi očito nerelevantni ili nedovoljni da bi ispunili uvjete iz članka 7. stavka 2. za bilo koje od ranijih prava, prigovor se odbija kao neosnovan.
Once a decision rejecting an application as referred to in paragraph 1 has become final, the oppositions for which proceedings have been suspended in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be deemed to have been disposed of and the opposing parties concerned shall be informed accordingly.
Ako prigovor nije odbijen u skladu sa stavkom 1., Ured šalje podnesak podnositelja prigovora podnositelju prijave i poziva ga da dostavi svoje primjedbe u roku koji je odredio Ured.
Such a disposition shall be considered to constitute a case which has not proceeded to judgment within the meaning of Article 85(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Ako podnositelj prijave ne dostavi primjedbe, Ured temelji svoju odluku o prigovoru na dostavljenim dokazima.
The Office shall refund 50 % of the opposition fee paid by each opposing party whose opposition is deemed to have been disposed of in accordance with paragraph 3, provided that the suspension of the proceedings relating to that opposition took place before the commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings.
Primjedbe koje je dostavio podnositelj prijave dostavljaju se podnositelju prigovora koji se poziva, ako to Ured smatra nužnim, da odgovori u roku koji je Ured odredio.
Article 10
Ako nakon isteka roka iz članka 7. stavka 1. podnositelj prigovora dostavi činjenice ili dokaze kojima se dopunjuju relevantne činjenice ili dokazi dostavljeni u tom razdoblju i koji se odnose na isti uvjet iz članka 7. stavka 2., Ured na temelju diskrecijske ovlasti iz članka 76. stavka 2.
Proof of use
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 odlučuje hoće li prihvatiti te dodatne činjenice ili dokaze.
A request for proof of use of an earlier mark pursuant to Article 42(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall be admissible if it is submitted as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 8(2) of this Regulation.
U tu svrhu Ured posebno uzima u obzir fazu postupka te hoće li te činjenice i dokazi na prvi pogled biti relevantni za ishod predmeta i postoje li opravdani razlozi za njihovo dostavljanje sa zakašnjenjem.
Where the applicant has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark which complies with the requirements of Article 42(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Office shall invite the opposing party to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Ured poziva podnositelja prijave da kao odgovor dostavi dodatne primjedbe ako to smatra primjerenim s obzirom na okolnosti.
Where the opposing party does not provide any evidence or reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or where the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly insufficient or irrelevant, the Office shall reject the opposition in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Ako prigovor nije odbijen u skladu sa stavkom 1. i ako dokazi koje je dostavio podnositelj prigovora nisu dovoljni za potkrjepljenje prigovora u skladu s člankom 7. za bilo koje od ranijih prava, prigovor se odbija kao neosnovan.
The indications and evidence of use shall establish the place, time, extent and nature of use of the opposing trade mark for the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and on which the opposition is based.
8.
The evidence referred to in paragraph 3 shall be filed in accordance with Article 55(2) and Articles 63 and 64 and shall be limited to the submission of supporting documents and items such as packages, labels, price lists, catalogues, invoices, photographs, newspaper advertisements, and statements in writing as referred to in Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Članak 6. stavci 2. i 3. primjenjuju se na odgovarajući način nakon datuma kada se smatra da je započeo kontradiktorni dio postupka povodom prigovora.
A request for proof of use may be filed at the same time as observations on the grounds on which the opposition is based.
Ako podnositelj želi povući ili ograničiti prijavu protiv koje je podnesen prigovor, on to čini u zasebnom dokumentu.
Such observations may also be filed together with the observations in reply to the proof of use.
Ured može u odgovarajućim slučajevima tražiti od stranaka da ograniče svoje primjedbe na određena pitanja i u tom im slučaju dopušta da postave druga pitanja u kasnijoj fazi postupka.
Where the evidence supplied by the opposing party is not in the language of the opposition proceedings, the Office may require the opposing party to submit a translation of that evidence in that language pursuant to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
Ured nije dužan obavijestiti stranku da može dostaviti relevantne činjenice ili dokaze koje prethodno nije dostavila.
Where after the expiry of the time limit referred to in paragraph 2, the opposing party submits indications or evidence that supplement relevant indications or evidence already submitted before expiry of that time limit and relate to the same requirement laid down in paragraph 3, the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in deciding whether to accept those supplementing indications or evidence.
Članak 9.
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the indications or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the indications or evidence.
Višestruki prigovori
TITLE III
Ako je dostavljeno više prigovora u odnosu na istu prijavu za registraciju žiga EU-a, Ured ih može ispitati u jednom skupu postupaka.
AMENDMENT OF THE APPLICATION
Ured može naknadno odlučiti da će te prigovore ispitati odvojeno.
Article 11
Ako se tijekom prethodnog ispitivanja jednog ili više prigovora utvrdi da žig EU-a za koji je podnesena prijava za registraciju možda ne zadovoljava uvjete za registraciju u pogledu nekih, ili svih, proizvoda ili usluga za koje se traži registracija, Ured može obustaviti drugi postupak povodom prigovora koji se odnosi na tu prijavu.
Amendment of the application
Ured obavješćuje podnositelje prigovora na koje utječe obustava o svim relevantnim odlukama donesenima u kontekstu tekućeg postupka.
A request for amendment of an application pursuant to Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain:
Kada odluka kojom se odbija prijava iz stavka 1. postane pravomoćna, smatra se da su prigovori u odnosu na koje su postupci obustavljeni u skladu sa stavkom 2. odbijeni i u skladu s time obavješćuju se predmetni podnositelji prigovora.
the file number of the application;
Takvo odbijanje smatra se predmetom u kojem nije donesena odluka u smislu članka 85. stavka 4.
the name and address of the applicant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
an indication of the element of the application to be amended, and that element in its amended version;
Ured vraća 50 % pristojbe za prigovor koju je platio svaki podnositelj prigovora čiji se prigovor smatra odbijenim u skladu sa stavkom 3. pod uvjetom da je postupak povezan s tim prigovorom obustavljen prije početka kontradiktornog dijela postupka.
where the amendment relates to the representation of the mark, a representation of the mark as amended, in accordance with Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
Članak 10.
Where the requirements for the amendment of the application are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiency to the applicant and shall specify a time limit for remedying the deficiency.
Dokaz o uporabi
Where the applicant does not remedy the deficiency within the specified time limit, the Office shall reject the request for amendment.
Zahtjev za dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga u skladu s člankom 42. stavcima 2. ili 3.
Where the amended trade mark application is published pursuant to Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, Articles 2 to 10 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 dopušten je ako je podnesen kao bezuvjetni zahtjev u zasebnom dokumentu u roku koji je Ured odredio u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 2. ove Uredbe.
A single request for amendment may be made for the amendment of the same element in two or more applications by the same applicant.
Ako je podnositelj prijave zatražio dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga koji je u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 42. stavka 2. ili 3.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 shall apply mutatis mutandis for applications to correct the name or the business address of a representative appointed by the applicant.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, Ured poziva podnositelja prigovora da dostavi potrebni dokaz u roku koji je odredio Ured.
TITLE IV
Ako podnositelj prigovora ne dostavi dokaz ili razlog za neuporabu prije isteka roka ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi ili razlozi očito nedovoljni ili nerelevantni, Ured odbija prigovor ako se on temelji na tom ranijem žigu.
REVOCATION AND INVALIDITY OR ASSIGNMENT
Podacima i dokazima kojima se dokazuje uporaba utvrđuju se mjesto, vrijeme, opseg i priroda uporabe žiga protiv kojeg se podnosi prigovor za proizvode ili usluge za koje je registriran i na kojima se temelji prigovor.
Article 12
Dokazi iz stavka 3. dostavljaju se u skladu s člankom 55. stavkom 2. i člancima 63. i 64., a ograničeni su na podnošenje pratećih dokumenata i predmeta kao što su paketi, oznake, cjenici, katalozi, računi, fotografije, novinski oglasi i pisane izjave iz članka 78. stavka 1. točke (f) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
Application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Zahtjev za dokaz o uporabi može se podnijeti istodobno kad i primjedbe o razlozima na kojima se temelji prigovor.
An application to the Office for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity pursuant to Article 56 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain:
Te se primjedbe mogu dostaviti i zajedno s primjedbama u odgovoru na dokaz o uporabi.
the registration number of the EU trade mark in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought and the name of its proprietor;
Ako dokaz koji je dostavio podnositelj prigovora nije na jeziku postupka povodom prigovora, Ured može zatražiti od podnositelja prigovora da dostavi prijevod tih dokaza na taj jezik u skladu s člankom 24.
the grounds on which the application is based by means of a statement that the respective requirements laid down in Articles 51, 52, 53, 73, 74, 74i or 74j of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 are fulfilled;
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.
as concerns the applicant:
Ako nakon isteka roka iz članka 2. podnositelj prigovora dostavi podatke ili dokaze kojima se dopunjuju relevantni podaci ili dokazi koji su već podneseni prije isteka tog roka i odnose se na isti zahtjev iz stavka 3., Ured na temelju diskrecijske ovlasti iz članka 76. stavka 2.
the identification of the applicant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 odlučuje hoće li prihvatiti te dodatne podatke ili dokaze.
where the applicant has appointed a representative or where representation is mandatory within the meaning of Article 92(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the name and business address of the representative, in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
U tu svrhu Ured posebno uzima u obzir fazu postupka te hoće li ti podaci i dokazi na prvi pogled biti relevantni za ishod predmeta i postoje li opravdani razlozi za njihovo dostavljanje sa zakašnjenjem.
an indication of the goods or services in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought, in the absence of which the application shall be deemed to be directed against all the goods or services covered by the contested EU trade mark.
GLAVA III.
In addition to the requirements laid down in paragraph 1, an application for a declaration of invalidity based on relative grounds shall contain the following:
IZMJENA PRIJAVE
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, an identification of the earlier right on which the application is based, in accordance with Article 2(2)(b) of this Regulation, which shall apply mutatis mutandis to such an application;
Članak 11.
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 53(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, an indication of the nature of the earlier right on which the application is based, its representation and an indication of whether this earlier right exists in the whole of the Union or in one or more Member States, and if so, an indication of those Member States;
Izmjena prijave
particulars pursuant to Article 2(2)(d) to (g), which apply mutatis mutandis to such an application;
Zahtjev za izmjenu prijave u skladu s člankom 43. stavkom 2.
where the application is entered by a licensee or by a person who is entitled under the relevant Union legislation or national law to exercise an earlier right, an indication concerning the authorisation or entitlement to file the application.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 sadržava sljedeće:
Where the application for a declaration of invalidity pursuant to Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 is based on more than one earlier mark or earlier right, paragraphs 1(b) and 2 of this Article shall apply for each of those marks or rights.
broj spisa prijave;
The application may contain a reasoned statement on the grounds setting out the facts and arguments on which it is based and supporting evidence.
ime i adresu podnositelja prijave u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
Article 13
podatke o elementu prijave koji će se izmijeniti te taj element u izmijenjenoj inačici;
Languages used in revocation or invalidity proceedings
ako se izmjena odnosi na prikaz žiga, taj izmijenjeni prikaz u skladu s člankom 3.
The applicant for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity or the proprietor of the EU trade mark may inform the Office before the expiry of a period of two months from receipt by the EU trade mark proprietor of the communication referred to in Article 17(1), that a different language of proceedings has been agreed pursuant to Article 119(7) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.
Where the application has not been filed in that language, the proprietor may request that the applicant file a translation in that language.
Ako nisu ispunjeni zahtjevi za izmjenu prijave, Ured obavješćuje podnositelja prijave o nedostatku i navodi rok za njegov ispravak.
Such a request shall be received by the Office before the expiry of the period of two months from receipt by the EU trade mark proprietor of the communication referred to in Article 17(1).
Ako podnositelj ne ispravi nedostatak u navedenom roku, Ured odbija zahtjev za izmjenu.
The Office shall specify a time limit for the applicant to file such a translation.
Ako je izmijenjena prijava žiga objavljena u skladu s člankom 43. stavkom 2.
Where that translation is not filed or filed late, the language of the proceedings shall remain unchanged.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis članci 2. do 10. ove Uredbe.
Article 14
Jedan podnositelj prijave može podnijeti jedan zahtjev za izmjenu istog elementa u dvije ili više prijava.
Information to the parties concerning an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Stavci 1., 2. i 4. primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis na zahtjeve za ispravak imena i poslovne adrese zastupnika kojeg je imenovao podnositelj prijave.
An application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity and any document submitted by the applicant, as well as any communication addressed to one of the parties by the Office prior to the finding on admissibility shall be sent by the Office to the other party for the purposes of informing of the introduction of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity.
GLAVA IV.
Article 15
OPOZIV I PROGLAŠAVANJE NIŠTAVIM ILI PRIJENOS
Admissibility of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Članak 12.
Where the fee required under Article 56(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 has not been paid, the Office shall invite the applicant to pay the fee within a period specified by it.
Zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje žiga ništavim
Where the required fee is not paid within the specified period, the Office shall inform the applicant that the application for revocation or for declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been entered.
Zahtjev Uredu za opoziv ili proglašavanje žiga ništavim u skladu s člankom 56.
Where the fee has been paid after the expiry of the specified period, it shall be refunded to the applicant.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 sadržava sljedeće:
Where the application has been filed in a language which is not one of the languages of the Office as required under Article 119(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, or it does not comply with Article 12(1)(a) or (b) or, where applicable, Article 12(2)(a) or (b) of this Regulation, the Office shall reject the application as inadmissible.
broj registracije žiga EU-a za koji se traži opoziv ili proglašavanje ništavim i ime njegova nositelja;
Where the translation required under the second subparagraph of Article 119(6) Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 is not filed within a period of one month of the date of filing an application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity, the Office shall reject the application for revocation or for declaration of invalidity as inadmissible.
osnovu na kojoj se temelji zahtjev u obliku izjave da su ispunjeni uvjeti iz članaka 51., 52., 53., 73., 74., članka 74. točke i. ili članka 74. točke (j) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009;
Where the application does not comply with the provisions laid down in Article 12(1)(c), Article 12(2)(c) or (d), the Office shall inform the applicant accordingly and shall invite the applicant to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period of two months.
u pogledu podnositelja prijave:
If the deficiencies are not remedied before the time limit expires, the Office shall reject the application as inadmissible.
i. podatke o podnositelju prijave u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;