natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to identify at Union level the infected area for African swine fever in Hungary in collaboration with that Member State.
Direktive 2002/60/EZ utvrdila zaraženo područje na kojemu se primjenjuju mjere iz članka 15. te direktive.
Accordingly, the infected area in Hungary should be listed in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
Kao odgovor na tu situaciju donesena je Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2018/663.
This Decision should repeal and replace Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/663.
Kako bi se spriječili nepotrebni poremećaji trgovine unutar Unije i izbjeglo da treće zemlje nametnu neopravdane prepreke trgovini, potrebno je u suradnji s predmetnom državom članicom na razini Unije utvrditi područje zaraženo afričkom svinjskom kugom u Mađarskoj.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
U skladu s tim trebalo bi u Prilogu ovoj Odluci navesti zaraženo područje u Mađarskoj i utvrditi vrijeme trajanja te regionalizacije.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Ovom Odlukom trebalo bi staviti izvan snage i zamijeniti Provedbenu odluku (EU) 2018/663.
Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/663 is repealed.
Mađarska osigurava da zaraženo područje koje je utvrdila, na kojemu se primjenjuju mjere iz članka 15.
This Decision shall apply until 30 June 2018.
Članak 2.
Article 4
Provedbena odluka (EU) 2018/663 stavlja se izvan snage.
This Decision is addressed to Hungary.
Članak 3.
Done at Brussels, 4 June 2018.
Ova se Odluka primjenjuje do 30. lipnja 2018.
OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 4. lipnja 2018.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/663 of 27 April 2018 concerning certain interim protective measures relating to African swine fever in Hungary (OJ L 110, 30.4.2018, p. 136).
SL L 395, 30.12.1989., str. 13.
Areas established as Infected Area in Hungary as referred to in Article 1
Direktiva Vijeća 2002/60/EZ od 27. lipnja 2002. o utvrđivanju posebnih odredaba za kontrolu afričke svinjske kuge i o izmjeni Direktive 92/119/EEZ koja se odnosi na tješinsku bolest i afričku svinjsku kugu (SL L 192, 20.7.2002., str. 27.).
Date until applicable
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2018/663 оd 27. travnja 2018. o određenim privremenim zaštitnim mjerama povezanima s afričkom svinjskom kugom u Mađarskoj (SL L 110, 30.4.2018., str. 136.).
30 June 2018
Područja iz članka 1. utvrđena kao zaraženo područje u Mađarskoj
Council Decision (EU) 2018/839
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2018/839
On 30 November 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/2237, Mr Peter KOFOD POULSEN was replaced by Mr Niels Erik SØNDERGAARD as an alternate member.
Henrika Ringbæka MADSENA i g. Marca Perere CHRISTENSENA kao članova Odbora regija.
Two members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Henrik Ringbæk MADSEN and of Mr Marc Perera CHRISTENSEN as members of the Committee of the Regions.
Pet mjesta zamjenika članova Odbora regija postalo je slobodno istekom mandata g.
Five alternate members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Henrik BRADE JOHANSEN, Mr Martin HULGAARD, Mr Niels Erik SØNDERGAARD, Ms Jane Strange NIELSEN and Mr Henrik QVIST.
Henrika BRADEA JOHANSENA, g.
An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the appointment of Mr Per NØRHAVE as a member of the Committee of the Regions,
Martina HULGAARDA, g.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Nielsa Erika SØNDERGAARDA, gđe Jane Strange NIELSEN i g.
Article 1
Henrika QVISTA.
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:
Mjesto zamjenika člana postalo je slobodno imenovanjem g.
as members:
Pera NØRHAVEA članom Odbora regija,
Mr Arne LÆGAARD, Regional councillor, Central Denmark Region,
DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
Mr Per NØRHAVE, 1.
Članak 1.
Deputy Mayor, Municipality of Ringsted;
Sljedeće osobe imenuju se u Odbor regija do kraja tekućeg mandata koji istječe 25. siječnja 2020.:
as alternate members:
članovima:
Ms Karen MELCHIOR, Member of The City Council of Copenhagen,
g.
Mr Anders Rosenstand LAUGESEN, Councillor, Municipality of Skanderborg,
Arne LÆGAARD, Regional councillor, Central Denmark Region,
Mr Erik HØGH-SØRENSEN, Regional councillor, North Denmark Region,
g.
Mr Evan LYNNERUP, Regional councillor, Zealand Region,
Per NØRHAVE, 1.
Ms Ursula Beate DIETRICH-PETERSEN, Regional councillor, Zealand Region,
Deputy Mayor, Municipality of Ringsted,
Mr Marc Perera CHRISTENSEN, Magistrate member, Aarhus Municipality.
zamjenicima članova:
Article 2
gđa Karen MELCHIOR, Member of The City Council of Copenhagen,
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
g.
Done at Luxembourg, 4 June 2018.
Anders Rosenstand LAUGESEN, Councillor, Municipality of Skanderborg,
T. Tsacheva
g.
Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).
Evan LYNNERUP, Regional councillor, Zealand Region,
Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).
gđa Ursula Beate DIETRICH-PETERSEN, Regional councillor, Zealand Region,
Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).
g.
Council Decision (EU) 2015/2237 of 30 November 2015 appointing a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 317, 3.12.2015, p. 35).
Marc Perera CHRISTENSEN, Magistrate member, Aarhus Municipality.
On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116, (EU) 2015/190 and (EU) 2015/994 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.
Članak 2.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/840
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2018/840
establishing a watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495
o utvrđivanju popisa praćenja za tvari za koje je potrebno praćenje diljem Unije u području vodne politike u skladu s Direktivom 2008/105/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća i stavljanju izvan snage Provedbene odluke Komisije (EU) 2015/495
Having regard to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, and in particular Article8b(5) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2008/105/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 16. prosinca 2008. o standardima kvalitete okoliša u području vodne politike i o izmjeni i kasnijem stavljanju izvan snage Direktiva Vijeća 82/176/EEZ, 83/513/EEZ, 84/156/EEZ, 84/491/EEZ, 86/280/EEZ i izmjeni Direktive 2000/60/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, a posebno njezin članak 8.b stavak 5.,
Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC provides for the establishment of a watch list of substances for which Union-wide monitoring data are to be gathered for the purpose of supporting future prioritisation exercises in accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Člankom 8.b stavkom 1.
The first such watch list was to include an indication of the monitoring matrices and possible methods of analysis not entailing excessive costs for each substance.
Direktive 2008/105/EZ predviđa se utvrđivanje popisa praćenja za tvari za koje je potrebno prikupljati podatke o praćenju diljem Unije u svrhu podupiranja budućeg određivanja prioriteta u skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 2.
Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC specifies, inter alia, the conditions and modalities for the monitoring of the substances included in the watch list and for the reporting of the monitoring results by the Member States.
Direktive 2000/60/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća.
The substances in the watch list are to be selected from amongst those for which the information available indicates that they may pose a significant risk, at Union level, to or via the aquatic environment, but for which monitoring data are insufficient to come to a conclusion on the actual risk posed.
U prvom takvom popisu trebalo je navesti medije praćenja i moguće metode analize koje ne uključuju prekomjerne troškove.
Highly toxic substances, used in many Member States and discharged to the aquatic environment but not or rarely monitored, should be considered for inclusion in the watch list.
U članku 8.b Direktive 2008/105/EZ navedeni su i uvjeti i načini praćenja tvari uvrštenih u popis praćenja te izvješćivanja država članica o rezultatima praćenja.
That selection process should take into account information as itemised in points (a) to (e) of Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, giving particular consideration to emerging pollutants.
Tvari za uvrštavanje u popis praćenja treba odabrati među onima za koje dostupne informacije ukazuju na to da bi mogle predstavljati znatan rizik za vodni okoliš ili znatan rizik koji se putem njega prenosi, na razini Unije, ali za koje podaci o praćenju nisu dostatni da bi se zaključilo o stvarnom riziku.
The monitoring of the substances in the watch list should generate high-quality data on their concentrations in the aquatic environment, fit for the purpose of supporting, in a separate review exercise according to Article 16(4) of Directive 2000/60/EC, the risk assessments that underpin the identification of priority substances.
Vrlo toksične tvari, koje se upotrebljavaju u mnogim državama članicama i ispuštaju u vodni okoliš, ali ih se ne prati ili ih se rijetko prati, trebalo bi razmotriti za uvrštavanje u popis praćenja.
In that review, substances found to pose a significant risk should be considered for inclusion in the priority substances list.
Pri postupku odabira tvari trebalo bi uzeti u obzir informacije detaljno navedene u članku 8.b stavku 1. točkama od (a) do (e) Direktive 2008/105/EZ, posebno uzimajući u obzir nove onečišćujuće tvari.
An environmental quality standard would then also be set, which Member States would have to meet.
Praćenjem tvari s popisa trebali bi se dobiti visokokvalitetni podaci o njihovim koncentracijama u vodnom okolišu, koji su u okviru zasebnog preispitivanja u skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 4.
The proposal of a substance for inclusion in the priority substances list would be subject to an impact assessment.
Direktive 2000/60/EZ prikladni za podupiranje procjena rizika na kojima se temelji utvrđivanje prioritetnih tvari.
The first watch list of substances was set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495 and contained ten substances or groups of substances, together with an indication of the monitoring matrix, possible analytical methods not entailing excessive costs, and maximum acceptable method detection limits.
U tom preispitivanju, tvari za koje se utvrdi da predstavljaju znatan rizik trebalo bi razmotriti za uvrštavanje u popis prioritetnih tvari.
According to Article 8b(2) of Directive 2008/105/EC, the Commission is to update the watch list every two years.
Odredio bi se i standard kvalitete okoliša, koji bi države članice trebale dostići.
When updating the list, the Commission is to remove any substance for which a risk-based assessment as referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC can be concluded without additional monitoring data.
Prijedlog za uvrštavanje tvari u popis prioritetnih tvari bio bi podložan procjeni utjecaja.
During 2017, the Commission analysed the data from the first year of monitoring of the substances in the first watch list.
Prvi popis praćenja za tvari utvrđen je u Provedbenoj odluci Komisije (EU) 2015/495 i sadržavao je deset tvari ili skupina tvari zajedno s navedenim medijima praćenja, moguće metode analize koje ne uključuju prekomjerne troškove i najviše prihvatljive granice detekcije metoda.
On the basis of that analysis, the Commission concluded that sufficient high-quality monitoring data are available for the substances tri-allate, oxadiazon, 2,6-ditert-butyl-4-methylphenol and diclofenac, and that, therefore, those substances should be removed from the watch list.
U skladu s člankom 8.b stavkom 2.
As referred to in Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495, it would be appropriate to monitor the substance 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate in sediment.
Direktive 2008/105/EZ Komisija treba ažurirati popis praćenja svake dvije godine.
However, most monitoring data gathered are for water and the limited amount of sediment data reported are not enough to carry out a conclusive analysis for that monitoring matrix.
Pri ažuriranju popisa Komisija treba ukloniti s popisa sve tvari za koje se procjena na temelju rizika iz članka 16. stavka 2.
To ensure that the monitoring data gathered for that substance fully reflect the risk that it poses, the Commission will further investigate whether Member States could monitor it in sediment in a reliable and comparable manner.
Direktive 2000/60/EZ može izvršiti bez dodatnih podataka o praćenju.
In the meantime, that substance should be removed from the watch list.
Komisija je 2017. analizirala podatke prikupljene tijekom prve godine praćenja tvari s prvog popisa praćenja.
For the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin and for two of the neonicotinoids, namely imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, additional high-quality monitoring data are still needed to support the targeted risk-based assessment as referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Na temelju te analize Komisija je zaključila da postoje dovoljno kvalitetni podaci o praćenju tvari tri-alata, oksadiazona, 2,6-diterc-butil-4-metilfenola i diklofenaka te da bi stoga te tvari trebalo ukloniti s popisa praćenja.
Therefore those substances should be retained in the watch list.
Kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2015/495, bilo bi primjereno pratiti tvar 2-etilheksil-4-metoksicinamat u sedimentu.
Macrolide antibiotics and neonicotinoids were included as groups in the first watch list to account for the fact that substances with the same mode of action could have additive effects.
Međutim, većina je podataka o praćenju prikupljena za vodu, a ograničena količina podataka o sedimentu nije dovoljna za konačnu analizu tog medija praćenja.
This argument also justifies keeping the two groups in the watch list, despite the fact that sufficient high-quality monitoring data are available for some of the individual substances in those groups (the macrolide antibiotics clarithromycin and erythromycin, and the neonicotinoids acetamiprid, clothianidin and thiacloprid).
Kako bi se osiguralo da se u prikupljenim podacima o praćenju te tvari u potpunosti odražava rizik koji ta tvar predstavlja, Komisija će dodatno istražiti bi li države članice mogle pratiti tu tvar u sedimentu na pouzdan i usporediv način.
During 2017, the Commission also gathered data on a range of other substances that could be included in the watch list.
U međuvremenu tu bi tvar trebalo ukloniti s popisa praćenja.
It took into account the different types of relevant information referred to in Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, and consulted experts from Member States and stakeholder groups.
Za makrolidni antibiotik azitromicin i za dva neonikotinoida, konkretno imidakloprid i tiametoksan, potrebni su dodatni kvalitetni podaci o praćenju za potrebe ciljane procjene na temelju rizika iz članka 16. stavka 2.
Substances for which doubt exists about their toxicity, or for which the sensitivity, reliability or comparability of the available monitoring methods are not adequate, should not be included in the watch list.
Direktive 2000/60/EZ.
The insecticide metaflumizone, and the antibiotics amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin, were identified as suitable candidates.
Stoga bi te tvari trebalo zadržati na popisu praćenja.
The inclusion of amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin is consistent with the European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), which supports the use of the watch list to ‘improve knowledge of the occurrence and spread of antimicrobials in the environment’.
Makrolidni antibiotici i neonikotinoidi uvršteni su kao skupine tvari na prvi popis praćenja zbog činjenice da tvari koje djeluju na isti način mogu imati aditivno djelovanje.
In accordance with Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, the Commission identified possible methods of analysis for the proposed substances.
Time se opravdava i zadržavanje tih dviju skupina na popisu praćenja unatoč činjenici da su dostupni dostatni kvalitetni podaci o praćenju za pojedine tvari iz tih skupina (za makrolidne antibiotike klaritromicin i eritromicin te za neonikotinoide acetamiprid, klotianidin i tiakloprid).
The method detection limit should be, for each substance, at least as low as the substance-specific predicted no-effect concentration in the relevant matrix.
Komisija je tijekom 2017. prikupila i podatke o nizu drugih tvari koje bi se moglo uvrstiti u popis praćenja.
While reviewing the first watch list, the Commission identified new ecotoxicological information for the macrolide antibiotics clarithromycin and azithromycin, for methiocarb, and for the neonicotinoids imidacloprid, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam, which led it to revise the predicted no-effect concentrations for those substances.
Uzela je u obzir različite vrste relevantnih informacija navedene u članku 8.b stavku 1.
The maximum acceptable method detection limits set out in the watch list for those substances and groups of substances should be updated accordingly.
Direktive 2008/105/EZ te se savjetovala sa stručnjacima iz država članica i skupinama dionika.
The analytical methods indicated in the watch list are not considered to entail excessive costs.
Tvari o čijoj toksičnosti postoje dvojbe ili za koje osjetljivost, pouzdanost ili usporedivost dostupnih metoda praćenja nisu dostatne ne bi trebalo uvrštavati na popis praćenja.
If new information leads in the future to a decrease in the predicted no-effect concentration for specific substances, the maximum acceptable method detection limit may have to be lowered as long as those substances remain on the list.
Insekticid metaflumizon i antibiotici amoksicilin i ciprofloksacin određeni su kao prikladni kandidati.
For comparability, all substances should be monitored in whole water samples.
Uvrštenje amoksicilina i ciprofloksacina u skladu je s Europskim akcijskim planom „Jedno zdravlje” za borbu protiv antimikrobne otpornosti, kojim se podupire upotreba popisa praćenja „kako bi se unaprijedilo znanje o pojavi i širenju antimikrobnih sredstava u okolišu”.
Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495 should be repealed.
U skladu s člankom 8.b stavkom 1.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 21(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC,
Direktive 2008/105/EZ, Komisija je utvrdila moguće metode analize predloženih tvari.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Granica detekcije metode za svaku tvar trebala bi biti barem jednako niska kao i njezina koncentracija u odgovarajućem mediju ispod koje se ne očekuju štetni učinci (predviđena koncentracija bez učinka).
Article 1
Pri preispitivanju prvog popisa praćenja Komisija je utvrdila nove ekotoksikološke informacije o makrolidnim antibioticima klaritromicinu i azitromicinu, o metiokarbu te o neonikotinoidima imidaklopridu, tiaklopridu i tiametoksamu, na temelju čega je revidirala koncentracije bez učinka za te tvari.
The watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring referred to in Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC is set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Najviše prihvatljive granice detekcije metoda utvrđene u popisu praćenja za te tvari i skupine tvari trebalo bi izmijeniti u skladu s tim.
Article 2
Smatra se da metode analize navedene u popisu praćenja ne uključuju prekomjerne troškove.
Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495 is repealed.
Ako zbog novih podataka u budućnosti dođe do smanjenja predviđene koncentracije bez učinka za određene tvari, najviša prihvatljiva granica detekcije metode možda će se morati smanjiti dok su te tvari na popisu.
Article 3
Radi usporedivosti sve bi tvari trebalo pratiti u cjelovitim uzorcima vode.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Provedbenu odluku (EU) 2015/495 trebalo bi staviti izvan snage.
Done at Brussels, 5 June 2018.
Mjere predviđene ovom Odlukom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog na temelju članka 21. stavka 1.
For the Commission
Direktive 2000/60/EZ,
OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 84
Članak 1.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
Popis praćenja za tvari za koje je potrebno praćenje diljem Unije iz članka 8.b Direktive 2008/105/EZ utvrđen je u Prilogu ovoj Odluci.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495 of 20 March 2015 establishing a watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 78, 24.3.2015, p. 40).
Članak 2.
Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament ‘A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)’, COM(2017) 339 final.
Provedbena odluka (EU) 2015/495 stavlja se izvan snage.
Watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring as set out in Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC
Ova je Odluka upućena državama članicama.
Name of substance/group of substances
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 5. lipnja 2018.
CAS number
Za Komisiju
EU number
Član Komisije
Indicative analytical method
SL L 348, 24.12.2008., str. 84.
Maximum acceptable method detection limit (ng/l)
Direktiva 2000/60/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. listopada 2000. o uspostavi okvira za djelovanje Zajednice u području vodne politike (SL L 327, 22.12.2000., str. 1.).
17-Alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2)
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2015/495 оd 20. ožujka 2015. o utvrđivanju popisa praćenja za tvari za koje je potrebno praćenje diljem Unije u području vodne politike u skladu s Direktivom 2008/105/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća (SL L 78, 24.3.2015., str. 40.).
Large-volume SPE - LC-MS-MS
Komunikacija Komisije Vijeću i Europskom parlamentu: Europski akcijski plan „Jedno zdravlje” za borbu protiv antimikrobne otpornosti, COM(2017) 339 final.
17-Beta-estradiol (E2), Estrone (E1)
PRILOG
Macrolide antibiotics
Popis praćenja za tvari za koje je potrebno praćenje diljem Unije kako je utvrđeno u članku 8.b Direktive 2008/105/EZ
Methiocarb
Naziv tvari/skupine tvari
or GC-MS
CAS broj
Neonicotinoids
EU broj
Metaflumizone
Indikativna metoda analize
LLE - LC-MS-MS or SPE – LC-MS-MS
Najviša prihvatljiva granica detekcije metode (ng/l)
Amoxicillin
17-alfa-etinilestradiol (EE2)
Ciprofloxacin
SPE velikog volumena – LC-MS-MS
Chemical Abstracts Service
17-beta-estradiol (E2), estron (E1)
European Union number – not available for all substances
Makrolidni antibiotici
To ensure comparability of results from different Member States, all substances shall be monitored in whole water samples.
Metiokarb
Extraction methods:LLE — liquid liquid extractionSPE — solid-phase extractionAnalytical methods:GC-MS — Gas chromatography-mass spectrometryLC-MS-MS — Liquid chromatography (tandem) triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
ili GC-MS
Erythromycin (CAS number 114-07-8, EU number 204-040-1), Clarithromycin (CAS number 81103-11-9), Azithromycin (CAS number 83905-01-5, EU number 617-500-5)
Neonikotinoidi