natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Office shall notify the applicant and the proprietor of the EU trade mark of any finding pursuant to paragraph 1 that the application for revocation or declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been entered and of any decision to reject the application for revocation or declaration of invalidity on the grounds of inadmissibility under paragraphs 2, 3 or 4.
ako je podnositelj prijave imenovao zastupnika ili ako je zastupanje obvezno u skladu s člankom 92. stavkom 2.
Where an application for revocation or declaration of invalidity is rejected in its entirety as inadmissible pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 or 4, prior to the notification of Article 17(1), no decision on costs shall be taken.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, ime i poslovnu adresu zastupnika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (e) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
Article 16
podatke o proizvodima ili uslugama u odnosu na koje se traži opoziv ili proglašavanje ništavosti, bez kojih će se smatrati da se prijava odnosi na sve proizvode ili usluge obuhvaćene osporenim žigom EU-a.
Substantiation of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Osim zahtjeva iz stavka 1., zahtjev za proglašavanje ništavosti na temelju relativnih razloga sadržava sljedeće:
The applicant shall present the facts, evidence and arguments in support of the application up to the closure of the adversarial part of revocation or invalidity proceedings.
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 1.
In particular, the applicant shall provide the following:
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, podatke o ranijem pravu na kojem se temelji prijava u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. točkom (b) ove Uredbe, koja se mutatis mutandis primjenjuje na tu prijavu;
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 51(1)(b) or (c) or Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, facts, arguments and evidence to support the grounds on which the application for revocation or declaration of invalidity is based;
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 2.
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the evidence required by Article 7(2) of this Regulation and the provisions of Article 7(3) shall apply mutatis mutandis;
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, podatke o prirodi ranijeg prava na kojem je utemeljen zahtjev, njegov prikaz i podatke o tome postoji li to ranije pravo u cijeloj Uniji ili u jednoj ili više država članica i ako postoji, imena tih država članica;
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 53(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, evidence of acquisition, continued existence and scope of protection of the relevant earlier right as well as evidence proving that the applicant is entitled to file the application, including, where the earlier right is invoked pursuant to national law, a clear identification of the contents of that national law by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or jurisprudence.
pojedinosti u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. točkama (d) do (g) koje se primjenjuju mutatis mutandis na takav zahtjev;
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of an earlier right under Article 53(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 or the evidence concerning the contents of the relevant national law is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the applicant may provide such evidence by making reference to that source.
ako zahtjev podnosi stjecatelj licencije ili osoba koja u skladu s relevantnim zakonodavstvom Unije ili nacionalnim zakonodavstvom može ostvarivati ranije pravo, podatke o odobrenju ili pravu na podnošenje prigovora.
Evidence concerning the filing, registration or renewal of earlier rights or, where applicable, the contents of the relevant national law, including evidence accessible online, as referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), shall be filed in the language of the proceedings or a translation into that language shall be filed.
Ako se zahtjev za proglašavanje ništavosti u skladu s člankom 53.
The translation shall be submitted by the applicant on the applicant's own motion within one month from the filing of such evidence.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 temelji na više ranijih žigova ili prava, stavak 1. točka (b) i stavak 2. ovog članka primjenjuju se za svaki od tih žigova ili prava.
Any other evidence submitted by the applicant to substantiate the application or, in case of an application for revocation under Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, by the proprietor of the contested EU trade mark, shall be subject to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
Zahtjev može sadržavati obrazloženu izjavu o razlozima u kojoj su navedene činjenice i argumenti na kojima se temelji te prateći dokazi.
Article 17
Članak 13.
Examination on the merits of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Jezici koji se upotrebljavaju u postupku za opoziv ili proglašavanje ništavosti
Where the application is found admissible pursuant to Article 15, the Office shall send a communication to the parties informing them that the adversarial part of the revocation or invalidity proceedings has commenced and inviting the proprietor of the EU trade mark to file observations within a specified period.
Podnositelj zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti ili nositelj žiga EU-a može obavijestiti Ured prije isteka roka od dva mjeseca otkad je nositelj žiga EU-a zaprimio obavijest iz članka 17. stavka 1. da je dogovoren drugi jezik postupka u skladu s člankom 119. stavkom 7.
Where the Office has invited a party in accordance with Article 57(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 to file observations within a specified period and that party does not submit any observations within that period, the Office shall close the adversarial part of the proceedings and base its ruling on the revocation or invalidity on the basis of the evidence before it.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
Where the applicant has not submitted the facts, arguments or evidence required to substantiate the application, the application shall be rejected as unfounded.
Ako zahtjev nije dostavljen na tom jeziku, nositelj žiga može zatražiti da podnositelj zahtjeva dostavi prijevod na tom jeziku.
Without prejudice to Article 62, all observations filed by the parties shall be sent to the other party concerned.
Ured mora zaprimiti taj zahtjev prije isteka roka od dva mjeseca otkad je nositelj žiga EU-a zaprimio obavijest iz članka 17. stavka 1.
Where the proprietor surrenders the EU trade mark subject to an application as referred to in Article 12 to cover only goods or services against which the application is not directed, or the EU trade mark is cancelled in parallel proceedings, or expires, the proceedings shall be closed except where Article 50(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall apply or the applicant shows a legitimate interest in obtaining a decision on the merits.
Ured određuje rok u kojem podnositelj zahtjeva treba dostaviti taj prijevod.
Where the proprietor partially surrenders the EU trade mark by deleting some of the goods or services against which the application is directed, the Office shall invite the applicant to state, within such a period as it may specify, whether it maintains the application and if so, against which of the remaining goods or services.
Ako taj prijevod nije dostavljen ili je dostavljen sa zakašnjenjem, jezik postupka ne mijenja se.
Where the applicant withdraws the application in light of the surrender, or the Office is informed about a settlement between the parties, the proceedings shall be closed.
Članak 14.
Where the proprietor wishes to surrender the contested EU trade mark, it shall do so by way of a separate document.
Informacije strankama o zahtjevu za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti
Article 8(9) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti i svaki dokument koji je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva te sve obavijesti koje je Ured uputio jednoj od stranaka prije odluke o dopuštenosti, Ured šalje drugoj stranci kako bi je obavijestio o podnošenju zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti.
Article 18
Članak 15.
Multiple applications for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Dopuštenost zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti
Where a number of applications for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity have been filed relating to the same EU trade mark, the Office may examine them in one set of proceedings.
Ako pristojba propisana člankom 56. stavkom 2.
The Office may subsequently decide to examine those applications separately.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 nije plaćena, Ured poziva podnositelja zahtjeva da plati pristojbu u određenom roku.
Article 9(2), (3) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Ako potrebna pristojba nije plaćena u propisanom roku, Ured obavješćuje podnositelja zahtjeva da se smatra da zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti nije podnesen.
Article 19
Ako je pristojba plaćena nakon isteka propisanog roka, iznos pristojbe vraća se podnositelju zahtjeva.
Proof of use in relation to an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Ako je zahtjev podnesen na jeziku koji nije jedan od jezika Ureda kako je propisano člankom 119. stavkom 5.
In the case of an application for revocation based on Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Office shall invite the proprietor of the EU trade mark to provide proof of genuine use of that mark or of proper reasons for non-use, within such period as it shall specify.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 ili ako nije u skladu s člankom 12. stavkom 1. točkom (a) ili (b) i, prema potrebi, s člankom 12. stavkom 2. točkom (a) ili (b) ove Uredbe, Ured odbija zahtjev kao nedopušten.
Where the proprietor does not provide such proof or reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly insufficient or irrelevant, the EU trade mark shall be revoked.
Ako prijevod koji se zahtijeva u skladu s člankom 119. stavkom 6. drugim podstavkom Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 nije podnesen u roku od jednog mjeseca od datuma podnošenja zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti, Ured odbija zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti kao nedopušten.
Article 10(3), (4), (6) and (7) of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Ako zahtjev nije u skladu s odredbama iz članka 12. stavka 1. točke (c) i članka 12. stavka 2. točke (c) ili (d), Ured o tome obavješćuje podnositelja zahtjeva i poziva ga da ispravi utvrđene nedostatke u roku od dva mjeseca.
A request for proof of use pursuant to Article 57(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall be admissible if the proprietor of the EU trade mark submits it as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 17(1) of this Regulation.
Ako nedostaci nisu ispravljeni prije isteka roka, Ured odbija zahtjev kao nedopušten.
Where the proprietor of the EU trade mark has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark or of proper reasons for non-use which complies with the requirements of Article 57(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Office shall invite the applicant for a declaration of invalidity to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Ured obavješćuje podnositelja zahtjeva i nositelja žiga EU-a o zaključcima u skladu sa stavkom 1. da se smatra zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim nije podnesen i o odluci o odbijanju zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim zbog nedopuštenosti u skladu sa stavcima 2., 3. ili 4.
Where the applicant for a declaration of invalidity does not provide such proof or reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly insufficient or irrelevant, the Office shall reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Ako je zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti u cijelosti odbijen kao nedopušten u skladu sa stavkom 2., 3. ili 4 prije obavijesti iz članka 17. stavka 1., ne donosi se odluka o troškovima.
Article 10(3) to (7) of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Članak 16.
Article 20
Potkrjepljenje zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti
Request for assignment
Podnositelj zahtjeva dostavlja činjenice, dokaze i argumente u potporu zahtjevu do zaključivanja kontradiktornog dijela postupka za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim.
Where the proprietor of a trade mark requests, in accordance with Article 18(1) and (2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, an assignment instead of a declaration of invalidity, the provisions of Articles 12 to 19 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Podnositelj zahtjeva posebno dostavlja sljedeće:
Where a request for assignment pursuant to Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 is partially or totally granted by the Office or by an EU trade mark court and the decision or judgment has become final, the Office shall ensure that the resulting partial or total transfer of the EU trade mark is entered in the Register and published.
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 51. stavkom 1. točkom (b) ili (c) ili člankom 52.
TITLE V
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, činjenice, argumente i dokaze o osnovi na kojoj se temelji zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim;
APPEALS
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 1.
Article 21
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaze propisane člankom 7. stavkom 2. ove Uredbe, a odredbe članka 7 stavka 3. primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis;
Notice of Appeal
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 2.
A notice of appeal filed in accordance with Article 60(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain the following:
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaze o stjecanju, trajnom postojanju i opsegu zaštite mjerodavnog ranijeg prava te dokaze da podnositelj zahtjeva ima pravo podnijeti zahtjev uključujući, ako se poziva na ranije pravo u skladu s nacionalnim pravom, jasno navođenje sadržaja nacionalnog zakona na kojem se temelji navođenjem objava relevantnih odredaba ili sudske prakse.
the name and address of the appellant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
Ako su dokazi o podnošenju prijave ili registraciji ranijeg prava iz članka 53. stavka 2. točke (d) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 ili dokazi povezani sa sadržajem nacionalnog zakona dostupni na internetu iz izvora koji Ured priznaje, podnositelj zahtjeva može dostaviti te dokaze upućivanjem na taj izvor.
where the appellant has appointed a representative, the name and the business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
Dokazi o podnošenju prijave, registraciji ili produljenju ranijih prava ili, ako je primjenjivo, sadržaju relevantnog nacionalnog zakona, uključujući dokaze dostupnima na internetu, kako je navedeno u stavku 1. točkama (b) i (c), podnose se na jeziku postupka ili se podnosi njihov prijevod na taj jezik.
where representation of the appellant is mandatory pursuant to Article 92(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the name and the business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
Prijevod dostavlja podnositelj zahtjeva na vlastitu inicijativu u roku od mjesec dana od podnošenja takvih dokaza.
a clear and unambiguous identification of the decision subject to appeal indicating the date on which it has been issued and the file number of the proceedings to which the decision subject to appeal relates;
Na sve ostale dokaze koje je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva u potporu zahtjeva ili, u slučaju zahtjeva za opoziv iz članka 51. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, nositelj osporenog žiga EU-a, primjenjuje se članak 24.
where the decision subject to appeal is only contested in part, a clear and unambiguous identification of the goods or services in respect of which the decision subject to appeal is contested.
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.
Where the notice of appeal is filed in another official language of the Union than the language of proceedings, the appellant shall provide a translation thereof within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal.
Članak 17.
Where in ex parte proceedings the decision subject to appeal has been taken in an official language other than the language of proceedings, the appellant may file the notice of appeal either in the language of the proceedings or in the language in which the decision subject to appeal was taken; in either case, the language used for the notice of appeal shall become the language of the appeal proceedings and paragraph 2 shall not apply.
Ispitivanje osnovanosti zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti
As soon as the notice of appeal has been filed in inter partes proceedings, it shall be notified to the defendant.
Ako je utvrđeno da je zahtjev dopušten u skladu s člankom 15., Ured strankama šalje obavijest kojom ih obavješćuje da je započeo kontradiktorni dio postupka za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim i poziva nositelja žiga EU-a da u određenom roku dostavi primjedbe.
Article 22
Ako je Ured pozvao stranku u skladu s člankom 57. stavkom 1.
Statement of Grounds
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 da podnese primjedbe u određenom roku i ta stranka u tom roku ne podnese nikakve primjedbe, Ured zaključuje kontradiktorni dio postupka i svoju odluku o opozivu ili proglašavanju ništavim temelji na dokazima kojima raspolaže.
A statement setting out the grounds of appeal filed pursuant to the fourth sentence of Article 60(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain a clear and unambiguous identification of the following:
Ako podnositelj zahtjeva nije dostavio potrebne činjenice, argumente ili dokaze za potkrjepljenje zahtjeva, zahtjev se odbija kao neosnovan.
the appeal proceedings to which it refers by indicating either the corresponding appeal number or the decision subject to appeal in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 21(1)(d) of this Regulation;
Ne dovodeći u pitanje članak 62., sve primjedbe koje su stranke dostavile šalju se drugoj uključenoj stranci.
the grounds of appeal on which the annulment of the contested decision is requested within the extent identified in accordance with Article 21(1)(e) of this Regulation;
Ako se nositelj odrekne žiga EU-a na temelju zahtjeva iz članka 12. da njime budu obuhvaćeni samo proizvodi ili usluge na koje se zahtjev ne odnosi, ili ako žig EU-a bude proglašen ništavim u usporednom postupku ili istekne, postupak se okončava, osim ako se primjenjuje članak 50. stavak 2.
the facts, evidence and arguments in support of the grounds invoked, submitted in accordance with the requirements set out in Article 55(2).
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 ili ako podnositelj zahtjeva pokaže zakoniti interes za odlučivanje o meritumu.
The statement of grounds shall be filed in the language of the appeal proceedings as determined in accordance with Article 21(2) and (3).
Ako se nositelj djelomično odrekne žiga EU-a brisanjem nekih proizvoda ili usluga na koje se zahtjev odnosi, Ured poziva podnositelja zahtjeva da se izjasni, u roku koji je on odredio, ostaje li pri svom zahtjevu i, ako ostaje, protiv kojih preostalih proizvoda ili usluga.
Where the statement of grounds is filed in another official language of the Union, the appellant has to provide a translation thereof within one month of the date of the submission of the original statement.
Ako podnositelj zahtjeva povuče zahtjev na temelju tog odricanja ili ako Ured bude obaviješten o nagodbi između stranaka, postupak se okončava.
Article 23
Ako nositelj želi povući ili ograničiti osporavani žig EU-a, on to čini u zasebnom dokumentu.
Admissibility of an appeal
8.
The Board of Appeal shall reject an appeal as inadmissible in any of the following events:
Članak 8. stavak 9. primjenjuje se mutatis mutandis.
where the notice of appeal has not been filed within two months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
Članak 18.
where the appeal does not comply with Articles 58 and 59 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, or with those laid down in Article 21(1)(d) and Article 21(2) and (3) of this Regulation, unless those deficiencies are remedied within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
Višestruki zahtjevi za opoziv ili za proglašavanje žiga ništavim
where the notice of appeal does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article 21(1)(a), (b), (c) and (e), and the appellant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied those deficiencies within the time limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect;
Ako je podneseno više zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim u odnosu na isti žig EU-a, Ured ih može ispitati u jednom skupu postupaka.
where the statement of grounds has not been filed within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
Ured može naknadno odlučiti da će te zahtjeve ispitati odvojeno.
where the statement of grounds does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article 22(1)(a) and (b), and the appellant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied those deficiencies within the time-limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect or has not submitted the translation of the statement of grounds within one month of the date of the submission of the original statement in accordance with Article 22(2).
2.
Where the appeal appears to be inadmissible, the chairperson of the Board of Appeal to which the case has been allocated pursuant to Article 35(1) may request the Board of Appeal to decide without delay on the admissibility of the appeal prior to the notification to the defendant of the notice or of the statement of grounds, as the case may be.
Članak 9. stavci 2., 3. i 4. primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis.
The Board of Appeal shall declare an appeal as deemed not to have been filed where the appeal fee has been paid after the expiry of the time limit set out in the first sentence of Article 60(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Članak 19.
In such a case, paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply.
Dokaz o uporabi u vezi sa zahtjevom za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti
Article 24
U slučaju zahtjeva za opoziv na temelju članka 51. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, Ured poziva nositelja žiga EU-a da u roku koji je on odredio dostavi dokaz o stvarnoj uporabi tog žiga ili opravdane razloge zašto se on ne upotrebljava.
Response
Ako nositelj žiga ne dostavi taj dokaz ili razloge za neuporabu prije isteka vremenskog roka ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi ili razlozi očito nedovoljni ili nerelevantni, žig EU-a opoziva se.
In inter partes proceedings, the defendant may file a response within two months of the date of notification of the appellant's statement of grounds.
Članak 10. stavci 3., 4., 6. i 7. ove Uredbe primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis.
In exceptional circumstances, that time-limit may be extended upon reasoned request by the defendant.
Zahtjev za dokaz o uporabi u skladu s člankom 57. stavcima 2. ili 3.
The response shall contain the name and address of the defendant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431 and shall comply, mutatis mutandis, with the conditions laid down in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d), Article 22(1)(a) and (c) and Article 22(2) of this Regulation.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 dopušten je ako ga je nositelj žiga EU-a dostavio kao bezuvjetni zahtjev u zasebnom dokumentu u roku koji je Ured odredio u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. ove Uredbe.
Article 25
Ako je nositelj žiga EU-a zatražio dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga ili o opravdanim razlozima zašto se on ne upotrebljava koji je u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 57. stavka 2. ili 3.
Cross appeal
Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, Ured poziva podnositelja zahtjeva za proglašavanje ništavim da dostavi potrebni dokaz u roku koji je odredio Ured.