natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Stock
HER/4AB. i s tim povezan posebni uvjet HER/*4AB-C
HER/4AB. and related special condition HER/*4AB-C
Vrsta
Species
Haringa (sleđ) (Clupea harengus)
Herring (Clupea harengus)
Zona
Zone
vode Unije i norveške vode u zoni IV. sjeverno od 53° 30′ S
Union and Norwegian waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N
Datum zabrane
Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/23
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/23
Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/25
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/25
The Commission has examined France's application pursuant to Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Montravel’.
Komisija je ispitala zahtjev Francuske podnesen u skladu s člankom 105.
The Commission has published the application for the approval of amendments to the specification, as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013 za odobrenje izmjene specifikacije zaštićene oznake izvornosti „Montravel”.
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Montravel’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013.
Done at Brussels, 9 January 2018.
Odobrava se izmjena specifikacije objavljena u Službenom listu Europske unije povezana s nazivom „Montravel” (ZOI).
OJ C 255, 5.8.2017, p. 10.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 9. siječnja 2018.
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Ribeiras do Morrazo’ (PGI)
o zaštiti naziva „Ribeiras do Morrazo” (ZOZP) u skladu s člankom 99.
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 17. prosinca 2013. o uspostavljanju zajedničke organizacije tržištâ poljoprivrednih proizvoda i stavljanju izvan snage uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 922/72, (EEZ) br. 234/79, (EZ) br. 1037/2001 i (EZ) br. 1234/2007 [1], a posebno njezin članak 99.,
In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Ribeiras do Morrazo’ sent by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
budući da:
In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Ribeiras do Morrazo’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013 Komisija je ispitala zahtjev Španjolske za upis naziva „Ribeiras do Morrazo” u registar te ga objavila u Službenom listu Europske unije [2].
The name ‘Ribeiras do Morrazo’ (PGI) is hereby protected.
Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013 trebalo bi zaštiti naziv „Ribeiras do Morrazo” i upisati ga u registar iz članka 104. te uredbe.
Done at Brussels, 9 January 2018.
Naziv „Ribeiras do Morrazo” (ZOZP) zaštićuje se.
OJ C 255, 5.8.2017, p. 15.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 9. siječnja 2018.
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije [1] („osnovna uredba”), a posebno njezin članak 13.,
In 2011, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 [2], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the original measures’) following an expiry review under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 990/2011 [2] Vijeće je 2011. uvelo konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz bicikala podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („početne mjere”), nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera na temelju članka 11. stavka 2. osnovne uredbe.
In 2013, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 [3] (‘the contested Regulation’), the Council extended the original measures to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not (‘the anti-circumvention measures’ or ‘the extended measures’) following an anti-circumvention investigation under Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Vijeće je 2013., nakon ispitnog postupka za sprečavanje izbjegavanja mjera na temelju članka 13. osnovne uredbe, Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 501/2013 [3] („sporna uredba”) proširilo početne mjere na uvoz bicikala poslanih iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šri Lanke i Tunisa, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šri Lanke i Tunisa ili nemaju („mjere za sprečavanje izbjegavanja mjera” ili „proširene mjere”).
In its judgment of 19 March 2015 [5], the General Court annulled the contested Regulation to the extent that it applies to City Cycle.
Presudom od 19. ožujka 2015.
In July 2015 the Council of the European Union [6], European Commission [7] and Maxcom Ltd [8] (a Union manufacturer of bicycle), appealed the General Court's judgment.
[5] Opći je sud poništio spornu uredbu u mjeri u kojoj se ona odnosi na društvo City Cycle.
By its judgment of 26 January 2017 (‘the judgment’), the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court of Justice’) dismissed the appeals submitted by the Union industry, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union.
U srpnju 2015.
In particular, the Court of Justice found, in paragraph 73 of its judgment, that recital (78) of the contested Regulation did not contain an individual analysis of circumvention practices in which City Cycle may have been engaged.
Vijeće Europske unije [6], Europska komisija [7] i Maxcom Ltd [8] (proizvođač bicikala iz Unije), podnijeli su žalbu na presudu Općeg suda.
The Court of Justice also found in paragraphs 75 and 76, that the conclusion as to the existence of transhipment operations in Sri Lanka could not legally be based only on the two findings expressly made by the Council, that is, first, that there had been a change in the pattern of trade and, second, that some of the producer-exporters had failed to cooperate [9].
Presudom od 26. siječnja 2017. („presuda”), Sud Europske unije („Sud”) odbio je žalbe koje su dostavili industrija Unije, Europska komisija i Vijeće Europske unije.
Consequences of the judgment
Konkretno, u točki 73. presude Sud je utvrdio da uvodna izjava (78) sporne uredbe ne sadržava nikakvu pojedinačnu analizu mogućih praksi izbjegavanja mjera koje bi City Cycle obavljao.
In line with Article 266 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, the Union institutions need to take the necessary steps to comply with the judgment of 26 January 2017.
Nadalje, Sud je u točkama 75. i 76. utvrdio da se zaključak u pogledu postojanja postupaka pretovara u Šri Lanki ne može pravno temeljiti samo na dvostrukom utvrđenju koje je izričito navelo Vijeće, odnosno, s jedne strane, na postojanju promjene strukture trgovine i, s druge strane, na nesuradnji dijela proizvođača izvoznika [9].
In cases where a proceeding consists of several administrative steps, the annulment of one of those steps does not annul the complete proceeding [10].
Posljedice presude
The anti-dumping proceeding is an example of such a multi-step proceeding.
U skladu s člankom 266.
Consequently, the annulment of the contested Regulation in relation to one party does not imply the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of that Regulation.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije institucije Unije dužne su poduzeti potrebne mjere kako bi postupile u skladu s presudom od 26. siječnja 2017.
The EU institutions have the possibility to remedy the aspects of the contested Regulation which led to its annulment, while leaving unchanged the uncontested parts which are not affected by the Court judgment [11].
U predmetima u kojima se postupak sastoji od nekoliko administrativnih koraka, poništenjem jednog od tih koraka ne poništava se cijeli postupak [10].
B. PROCEDURE
Antidampinški postupak primjer je takvog postupka koji se sastoji od više koraka.
Procedure until the judgment
Stoga se poništenjem sporne uredbe u odnosu na jednu stranu ne podrazumijeva poništenje cijelog postupka provedenog prije donošenja te uredbe.
The Commission confirms recitals (1) to (23) of the contested Regulation.
Institucije EU-a mogu ispraviti aspekte sporne uredbe koji su doveli do njezina poništenja, ostavljajući pritom nepromijenjene nesporne dijelove, na koje se ne odnosi presuda Suda [11].
They are not affected by the judgment.
B. POSTUPAK
Reopening
Postupak do donošenja presude
Following the judgment, on 11 April 2017 the Commission published a Notice [12] partially reopening the anti-circumvention investigation concerning imports of bicycles consigned from Sri Lanka, whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not that led to the adoption of the contested Regulation (‘the Notice of re-opening’) and resumed it at the point at which the irregularity occurred.
Komisija potvrđuje uvodne izjave od (1) do (23) sporne uredbe.
The reopening was limited in scope to the implementation of the judgment with regard to City Cycle.
Presuda ne utječe na te uvodne izjave.
The Commission informed City Cycle, the representatives of the exporting country, the Union industry and other interested parties known to be concerned from the original investigation of the partial reopening of the investigation.
Ponovno pokretanje postupka
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limit set out in the notice.
Nakon presude Komisija je 11. travnja 2017. objavila Obavijest [12] o djelomičnom ponovnom pokretanju ispitnog postupka za sprečavanje izbjegavanja mjera u vezi s uvozom bicikala poslanih iz Šri Lanke, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz Šri Lanke ili nemaju, koji je doveo do donošenja sporne uredbe („Obavijest o ponovnom pokretanju postupka”), te ga je nastavila u točki u kojoj je došlo do nepravilnosti.
All interested parties who so requested were granted the opportunity to be heard by the Commission services and/or the Hearing officer in trade proceedings.
Ponovno pokretanje postupka bilo je ograničeno na provedbu presude Općeg suda u pogledu društva City Cycle.
Nobody requested a hearing either with the Commission services or the Hearing officer in trade proceedings.
Komisija je o djelomičnom ponovnom pokretanju ispitnog postupka obavijestila društvo City Cycle, predstavnike zemlje izvoznice, industriju Unije i druge zainteresirane strane iz početnog ispitnog postupka za koje se znalo da se postupak na njih odnosi.
Registration of imports
Zainteresirane strane dobile su priliku da iznesu svoja stajališta u pisanom obliku i da zatraže saslušanje u roku određenom u Obavijesti.
Following the judgment, the European Bicycle Manufacturers Association and Maxcom Ltd requested that imports of bicycles in so far as it concerns City Cycle are made subject to registration under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation so that measures may subsequently be applied on those imports from the date of such registration.
Svim zainteresiranim stranama koje su to zatražile omogućeno je saslušanje pred službama Komisije i/ili službenikom za saslušanje u trgovinskim postupcima.
On 11 April 2017, the Commission made imports of bicycles consigned from Sri Lanka, whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not, in so far as it concerns the Sri Lankan company City Cycle Industries subject to registration (‘Registration Regulation’) [13].
Nitko nije zatražio saslušanje pred Komisijom i/ili službenikom za saslušanje u trgovinskim postupcima.
Product under investigation
Evidentiranje uvoza
The product under investigation is the same as in the contested Regulation that is bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, originating in the People's Republic of China (‘China’ or ‘PRC’), currently falling within CN codes ex87120030 and ex87120070.
Nakon presude European Bicycle Manufacturers Association i Maxcom Ltd zatražili su da se uvoz bicikala u mjeri u kojoj se odnosi na City Cycle podvrgne evidentiranju u skladu s člankom 14. stavkom 5. osnovne uredbe tako da se mjere mogu naknadno primijeniti na taj uvoz od datuma takvog evidentiranja.
The Commission confirms recitals (25) to (27) of the contested Regulation.
Komisija je 11. travnja 2017. uvoz bicikala poslanih iz Šri Lanke, bez obzira na to imaju li deklarirano podrijetlo iz Šri Lanke ili ne, uvjetovala evidentiranjem u mjeri u kojoj se odnosi na društvo iz Šri Lanke City Cycle Industries („Uredba o evidentiranju”) [13].
C. ASSESSMENT FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT
Proizvod iz ispitnog postupka
Preliminary remarks
Proizvod iz ispitnog postupka istovjetan je onome u spornoj uredbi, odnosno to su bicikli i ostala slična vozila (uključujući dostavne tricikle, no isključujući jednocikle), bez motornog pogona, podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („Kina” ili „NRK”), koji su trenutačno obuhvaćeni oznakama KN ex87120030 i ex87120070.
First, the Court of Justice held that the contested Regulation did not contain an individual analysis of circumvention practices in which City Cycle may have been engaged.
Komisija potvrđuje uvodne izjave od (25) do (27) sporne uredbe.
The two findings expressly made by the Council, that that there had been a change in the pattern of trade and that some of the producer-exporters had failed to cooperate were found by the Court of Justice not to be sufficient to entitle the Council to conclude either that City Cycle was involved in transhipment operations or that transhipment operations existed at national level in Sri Lanka.
C. PROCJENA NAKON PRESUDE
Second, it is recognised in paragraphs 29 and 31 of the judgment that the evidence communicated by City Cycle during the investigation did not show that it was a genuine producer or that its assembly operations did not constitute circumvention practice according to the criteria laid down in Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Uvodne napomene
Recitals (124) to (127) of the contested Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Prvo, Sud je utvrdio da sporna uredba ne sadržava nikakvu pojedinačnu analizu mogućih praksi izbjegavanja mjera koje bi društvo City Cycle Industries obavljalo.
Third, it follows from the judgment, in conjunction with the judgment of the General Court, that the Council was entitled to consider City Cycle as a non-cooperating party in the investigation and that there was a certain level of non-cooperation at national level in Sri Lanka.
Sud smatra da dvostruko utvrđenje koje je izričito iznijelo Vijeće – da je došlo do promjene strukture trgovine i da neki od proizvođača izvoznika nisu surađivali, nije dostatno za zaključak Vijeća da je City Cycle sudjelovao u postupcima pretovara ili da su se takvi postupci obavljali na nacionalnoj razini u Šri Lanki.
Recitals (35) to (42) of the contested Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Drugo, u točkama 29. i 31. presude priznaje se da podatci koje je dostavio City Cycle tijekom ispitnog postupka ne dokazuju da je on stvarni proizvođač ili da njegovi postupci sastavljanja ne čine prakse izbjegavanja mjera u skladu s kriterijima utvrđenima u članku 13. stavku 2. osnovne uredbe.
Undermining of the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty
Stoga se potvrđuju uvodne izjave od (124) do (127) sporne uredbe.
The Commission had found, in recitals (93) to (96) of the contested Regulation, undermining of the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty.
Treće, iz presude Suda, u vezi s presudom Općeg suda, proizlazi da je Vijeće opravdano moglo smatrati City Cycle stranom koja ne surađuje u ispitnom postupku i da je na nacionalnoj razini u Šri Lanki postojala određena razina nesuradnje.
Those findings are confirmed.
Stoga se potvrđuju uvodne izjave od (35) do (42) sporne uredbe.
Evidence of dumping
Narušavanje korektivnog učinka antidampinške pristojbe
The Commission had found, in recitals (97) and (98) as well as (107) to (110) of the contested Regulation, evidence of dumping.
Komisija je u uvodnim izjavama od (93) do (96) sporne uredbe utvrdila narušavanje korektivnog učinka antidampinške pristojbe.
Existence of circumvention practices
Ti se nalazi potvrđuju.
The contested Regulation has been annulled because the Council failed to provide, in the contested Regulation, sufficient substantiation as to the existence of circumventing practices for City Cycle Industries.
Dokazi o dampingu
It is recalled that the existence of circumvention practices can be established, inter alia, on the basis of transhipment or on the basis of assembly operations.
Komisija je u uvodnim izjavama (97) i (98) te uvodnim izjavama od (107) do (110) sporne uredbe utvrdila postojanje dokaza o dampingu.
The reopened investigation revealed that there was no further available evidence at company level which could support the finding of transhipment.
Postojanje praksi izbjegavanja mjerâ
Therefore, no further reasoning regarding transhipment could be put forward under recital (78) of the contested Regulation.
Sporna je uredba poništena jer Vijeće u njoj nije iznijelo dostatne argumente u prilog postojanju praksi izbjegavanja mjera proizvođača City Cycle Industries.
However, available evidence shows that circumvention practices via assembly operations took place.
Podsjeća se da se postojanje praksi izbjegavanja mjera može utvrditi, među ostalim, na temelju pretovara ili na temelju postupaka sastavljanja.
The evidence was based on the data submitted by City Cycle itself during the original investigation.
Ponovno pokrenutim ispitnim postupkom utvrđeno je da na razini trgovačkog društva nisu dostupni dodatni dokazi koji bi poduprli utvrđenje postojanja prakse pretovara.
The Council had not assessed that data in detail, because it considered that that was not necessary in order to demonstrate, to the required legal standard, existence of circumvention practices.
Stoga se nisu mogla iznijeti dodatna obrazloženja u pogledu pretovara iz uvodne izjave (78) sporne uredbe.
Now that the Court has clarified the applicable legal standard, the Commission considers it appropriate to reassess all the evidence available in the administrative file in the light of the applicable legal standard.
Međutim, dostupni dokazi pokazuju da su provođene prakse izbjegavanja mjera putem postupaka sastavljanja.
During the anti-circumvention investigation City Cycle came forward and requested exemption from the possible anti-circumvention measures.
Dokazi se temelje na podatcima koje je dostavilo samo društvo City Cycle tijekom početnog ispitnog postupka.
As described in recitals (37), (38) and (144) of the contested Regulation, City Cycle was unable to prove that it merited an exemption.
Vijeće te podatke nije podrobno procijenilo jer je smatralo da to nije nužno kako bi se dokazalo postojanje praksi izbjegavanja mjera na način koji je u skladu s pravnom normom.
The company afforded insufficient cooperation and Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation was applied.
Budući da je Sud naknadno pojasnio koja se pravna norma primjenjuje, Komisija smatra primjerenim ponovno procijeniti sve dostupne dokaze iz upravnog spisa s obzirom na primjenjivu pravnu normu.
The lack of reliable information as regards the value and volume of parts of Chinese origin purchased by the company made it impossible to positively establish that City Cycle was a genuine producer not involved in circumvention or that its assembly operations were not a form of circumvention.
Tijekom ispitnog postupka za sprečavanje izbjegavanja mjera društvo City Cycle javilo se i zatražilo izuzeće od mogućih mjera za sprečavanje izbjegavanja mjera.
As explained in recitals (16) and (17) above, these findings were not affected by the judgment.
Kako je opisano u uvodnim izjavama (37), (38) i (144) sporne uredbe, City Cycle nije uspio dokazati da bi trebao dobiti izuzeće.
In any event, however, the data submitted by the company itself demonstrate that:
Društvo nije dovoljno surađivalo te se primijenio članak 18. stavak 1. osnovne uredbe.
the raw materials (bicycle parts) from China constituted more than 60 % of the total value of the parts of the assembled product (60/40 test), while
Zbog nedostatka pouzdanih informacija u pogledu vrijednosti i količine dijelova kineskog podrijetla koje je kupilo društvo nije bilo moguće sa sigurnošću utvrditi da je City Cycle stvarni proizvođač, koji nije uključen u izbjegavanje mjera, ili da njegovi postupci sastavljanja nisu oblik izbjegavanja mjera.
the value added to the parts brought in during the assembly operation, was lower than 25 % of the manufacturing cost (25 % value added test).
Kako je objašnjeno u prethodnim uvodnim izjavama (16) i (17), presuda ne utječe na te nalaze.
According to the criteria of Article 13(2)(a) and (b) of the basic Regulation, this means that such assembly operations should be considered to constitute circumvention practice given the fulfilment of the other criteria as described in recitals (18) and (19) above.
U svakom slučaju, međutim, podatci koje je dostavilo samo to društvo dokazuju sljedeće:
Consequently, the existence of circumvention practices via assembly operations should be established at country level in Sri Lanka on the basis of the above evidence available at the company level that tends to show circumvention practices and given the high level of non-cooperation in Sri Lanka.
sirovine (dijelovi za bicikle) iz Kine činile su više od 60 % ukupne vrijednosti dijelova sastavljenog proizvoda (test 60/40), a
Consequently, the existence of assembly operations within the meaning of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation was established in Sri Lanka.
vrijednost koja je dodana dovedenim dijelovima tijekom postupka sastavljanja bila je niža od 25 % troškova proizvodnje (test dodane vrijednosti od 25 %).
After disclosure, City Cycle contested the competence of the Commission to adopt findings on the existence of assembly operations within the meaning of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Prema kriterijima iz članka 13. stavka 2. točaka (a) i (b) osnovne uredbe to znači da bi takve postupke sastavljanja trebalo smatrati praksama izbjegavanja mjera s obzirom na to da su ispunjeni ostali kriteriji opisani u uvodnim izjavama (18) i (19).
It argued that the Commission could not reassess the finding on the assembly operation because it had not been challenged in the court proceedings and that the Commission was therefore obliged to abandon the pursuit of measures against City Cycle.
Stoga bi, na temelju navedenih dokaza dostupnih na razini trgovačkog društva koji upućuju na prakse izbjegavanja mjera i s obzirom na visoku razinu nesuradnje u Šri Lanki, trebalo utvrditi postojanje praksi izbjegavanja mjera putem postupaka sastavljanja na razini zemlje u Šri Lanki.
This argument should be rejected.
Stoga je u Šri Lanki utvrđeno postojanje postupaka sastavljanja u smislu članka 13. stavka 2. osnovne uredbe.
First, it results from the judgments of the Court of Justice cited in recitals (4) and (5) that the condition for imposing anti-circumvention measures relates to the existence of circumventing practices as defined in Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, and not to a specific subset of these practices.
Nakon objave društvo City Cycle osporavalo je Komisijinu nadležnost za utvrđivanje nalaza o postojanju postupaka sastavljanja u smislu članka 13. stavka 2. osnovne uredbe.
Second, City Cycle interprets incorrectly the obligation imposed on the Commission by Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) in the present case.
Tvrdilo je da Komisija ne može ponovno procijeniti nalaz o postupku sastavljanja jer on nije bio osporavan u sudskom postupku te da bi Komisija stoga trebala odustati od uvođenja mjera protiv društva City Cycle.
As made clear in recital (6) of the Notice of re-opening, it is the lack of sufficient reasoning in the contested Regulation concerning the available evidence on the existence of circumventing practices in Sri Lanka that must be corrected in the current procedure.
Taj bi argument trebalo odbaciti.