natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Surface temperature [6]
7 °C); vi. da deklaracija subjekta u poslovanju s hranom prati pošiljku; u toj deklaraciji mora biti navedeno trajanje hlađenja prije utovara, vrijeme početka utovara trupova, polovica trupova, četvrti trupova ili polovica trupova rasječenih u tri dijela za veleprodaju, površinska temperatura u vrijeme utovara, najviša temperatura zraka za vrijeme prijevoza kojoj trupovi, polovice trupova, četvrti trupova ili polovice trupova rasječene u tri dijela za veleprodaju smiju biti izloženi, najdulje dopušteno trajanje prijevoza, datum odobrenja i naziv nadležnog tijela koje je odobrilo odstupanje;
Maximum time to chill to surface temperature [7]
subjekt u poslovanju s hranom kojem se pošiljka šalje dužan je obavijestiti nadležno tijelo prije nego što prvi put zaprimi trupove, polovice trupova, četvrti trupova ili polovice trupova rasječene u tri dijela za veleprodaju koji prije prijevoza nisu postigli temperaturu iz točke 1.;
Maximum transportation air temperature [8]
takvo meso prevozi se u skladu sa sljedećim parametrima:
Maximum daily mean carcase aerobic colony count [9]
za trajanje prijevoza [5] od najviše šest sati:
Ovine and caprine animals
Vrsta
8 hours
Površinska temperatura [6]
Bovine animals
Najdulje dopušteno trajanje hlađenja do postizanja površinske temperature [7]
20 hours
Najviša dopuštena temperatura zraka tijekom prijevoza [8]
Porcine animals
Najveća dopuštena srednja dnevna brojnost kolonije aerobnih bakterija na trupu [9]
16 hours
Ovce i koze
for a maximum transport time [5] Maximum time allowed from the start of loading of meat into the vehicle until the completion of the final delivery.
8 sati
Loading of the meat into the vehicle may be postponed beyond the maximum time allowed for chilling of the meat to its specified surface temperature.
Goveda
If this happens, then the maximum transport time allowed must be shortened by the same length of time by which the loading was postponed.
20 sati
The competent authority of the Member State of destination may limit the number of delivery points.
Svinje
of 30 hours:
16 sati
Surface temperature (2)
za trajanje prijevoza [5] Najdulje dopušteno trajanje od početka utovara mesa u vozilo do dovršetka konačne isporuke.
Maximum time to chill to surface temperature (3)
Utovar mesa u vozilo može biti odgođen zbog čega može doći do prekoračenja najduljeg dopuštenog trajanja hlađenja mesa do postizanja utvrđene površinske temperature.
Core temperature [10]
U tom slučaju najdulje dopušteno trajanje prijevoza mora se skratiti za onoliko za koliko je utovar odgođen.
Maximum transportation air temperature (4)
Nadležno tijelo države članice odredišta može ograničiti broj točaka dostave.
Maximum daily mean carcase aerobic colony count (5)
od najviše trideset sati:
log10 4 cfu/cm2
Površinska temperatura (2)
of 60 hours:
Najdulje dopušteno trajanje hlađenja do postizanja površinske temperature (3)
Core temperature (6)
Unutarnja temperatura (u svim dijelovima mesa) [10]
12 hours
Najviša dopuštena temperatura zraka tijekom prijevoza (4)
log10 3 cfu/cm2
Najveća dopuštena srednja dnevna brojnost kolonije aerobnih bakterija na trupu (5)
24 hours
log10 4 cfu/cm2
in Section I, Chapter V, the following point 5 is added:
od najviše šezdeset sati:
Carcases, half carcases, quarters, or half carcases cut into no more than three wholesale cuts may be boned and cut prior to reaching the temperature referred to in point 2(b) when they have been transported under the derogation set out in point 3(b) of Chapter VII of Section I. In this case, throughout cutting or boning, the meat must be subjected to air temperatures that ensure a continuous decrease of the temperature of the meat.
Unutarnja temperatura (u svim dijelovima mesa) (6)
As soon as it is cut and, where appropriate, packaged, the meat must be chilled to the temperature referred to in point 2(b) if it is not already below this temperature.’
12 sati
Article 2
log10 3 cfu/cm2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
24 sati
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
u odjeljku I. poglavlju V. dodaje se sljedeća točka 5.:
Done at Brussels, 31 October 2017.
Trupovi, polovice trupova, četvrti trupova ili polovice trupova rasječene u najviše tri dijela za veleprodaju mogu se otkoštavati i rasijecati i prije nego postignu temperaturu iz točke 2. podtočke (b) ako su prevezeni na temelju odstupanja iz odjeljka I. poglavlja VII. točke 3. podtočke (b).
For the Commission
U tom slučaju tijekom rasijecanja ili otkoštavanja meso mora biti izloženo temperaturama zraka koje osiguravaju stalno smanjenje temperature mesa.
The President
Čim se rasiječe i, prema potrebi, zapakira, meso se mora ohladiti do temperature iz točke 2. podtočke (b) (ako nije već hladnije od te temperature).”
EFSA Journal 2014; 12(3):3601 [81 pp.].
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
EFSA Journal 2016; 14(6):4523 [38 pp.].
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs (OJ L 338, 22.12.2005, p. 1).
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 31. listopada 2017.
Maximum time allowed from the start of loading of meat into the vehicle until the completion of the final delivery.
Za Komisiju
Maximum surface temperature allowed at loading and thereafter measures at the thickest part of the carcase, half carcases, quarters, or half carcases cut into three wholesale cuts.
Predsjednik
Maximum time allowed from the moment of killing until the reaching of the maximum surface temperature allowed at loading.
SL L 139, 30.4.2004., str. 55.
The maximum air temperature to which the meat is allowed to be subjected from the moment loading begins, and throughout the whole duration of the transport.
EFSA Journal (2014.); 12(3):3601 [81 str.].
Slaughterhouse maximum daily mean carcase aerobic colony count using a rolling window of 10 weeks, allowed for carcases of the relevant species, as assessed by the operator to the satisfaction of the competent authority, according to the sampling and testing procedures laid out in points 2.1.1, 2.1.2 of Chapter 2, and point 3.2 of Chapter 3, of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs (OJ L 338, 22.12.2005, p. 1).
EFSA Journal (2016.); 14(6):4523 [38 str.].
The maximum core temperature of the meat allowed at the time of loading, and thereafter.’;
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 2073/2005 od 15. studenoga 2005. o mikrobiološkim kriterijima za hranu (SL L 338, 22.12.2005., str. 1.).
log10 3,5 cfu/cm2
Najdulje dopušteno trajanje od trenutka klanja do postizanja najviše dopuštene površinske temperature u vrijeme utovara.
re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by Dongguan Luzhou Shoes Co.
o ponovnom uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz određene obuće s gornjim dijelom od kože podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Vijetnama koju proizvode trgovačka društva Dongguan Luzhou Shoes Co.
Ltd, Long Son Joint Stock Company and Zhaoqing Li Da Shoes Co., Ltd, implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14
Ltd, Long Son Joint Stock Company i Zhaoqing Li Da Shoes Co., Ltd i o provedbi presude Suda u spojenim predmetima C-659/13 i C-34/14
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’), and in particular to Article 266 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije („UFEU”), a posebno njegov članak 266.,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9(4) and 14(1) and (3) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije („Osnovna uredba”), a posebno njezin članak 9. stavak 4. i članak 14. stavke 1. i 3.,
On 23 March 2006, the Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 imposing provisional anti-dumping measures on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather (‘footwear’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘China’) and Vietnam (‘the provisional Regulation’).
Komisija je 23. ožujka 2006. donijela Uredbu (EZ) br. 553/2006 o uvođenju privremenih antidampinških mjera na uvoz određene obuće s gornjim dijelom od kože („obuća”) podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK” ili „Kina”) i Vijetnama („Privremena uredba”).
By Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties ranging from 9,7 % to 16,5 % on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather, originating in Vietnam and in the PRC for two years (‘Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006’ or ‘the contested Regulation’).
Vijeće je Uredbom (EZ) br. 1472/2006 uvelo konačne antidampinške pristojbe u rasponu od 9,7 % do 16,5 % na uvoz određene obuće s gornjim dijelom od kože podrijetlom iz Vijetnama i NRK-a na dvije godine („Uredba (EZ) br. 1472/2006” ili „Sporna uredba”).
By Regulation (EC) No 388/2008 the Council extended the definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the PRC to imports consigned from the Macao Special Administrative Region (‘SAR’), whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not.
Vijeće je Uredbom (EZ) br. 388/2008 proširilo konačne antidampinške mjere na uvoz određene obuće s gornjim dijelom od kože podrijetlom iz NRK-a na uvoz koji se otprema iz Posebnog upravnog područja Makaa („PUP”), bez obzira na to je li prijavljena kao proizvod podrijetlom iz Posebnog upravnog područja Makaa.
Further to an expiry review initiated on 3 October 2008, the Council further extended the anti-dumping measures for 15 months by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009, i.e. until 31 March 2011, when the measures expired (‘Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009’).
Vijeće je nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera pokrenute 3. listopada 2008. dodatno produžilo te antidampinške mjere za 15 mjeseci Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 1294/2009, tj. do 31. ožujka 2011., kad su mjere istekle („Provedbena uredba (EU) br. 1294/2009”).
Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd and Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd as well as Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
Društva Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd i Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd te Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
Ltd (‘the applicants’) challenged the contested Regulation in the Court of First Instance (now: the General Court).
Ltd („podnositelji zahtjeva”) osporila su Spornu uredbu pred Prvostupanjskim sudom (sada: Opći sud).
By judgments of 4 March 2010 in Case T-401/06 Brosmann Footwear (HK) and Others v Council and of 4 March 2010 in Joined Cases T-407/06 and T-408/06 Zhejiang Aokang Shoes and Wenzhou Taima Shoes v Council the General Court rejected those challenges.
Opći sud odbacio je ta osporavanja presudama od 4. ožujka 2010. u predmetu T-401/06 Brosmann Footwear (HK) i ostali protiv Vijeća i od 4. ožujka 2010. u spojenim predmetima T-407/06 i T-408/06 Zhejiang Aokang Shoes i Wenzhou Taima Shoes protiv Vijeća.
In its judgments of 2 February 2012 in case C-249/10 P Brosmann Footwear (HK) and Others v Council and of 15 November 2012 in case C-247/10 P Zhejiang Aokang Shoes v Council (‘the Brosmann and Aokang judgments’), the Court of Justice set aside those judgments.
U svojim presudama od 2. veljače 2012. u predmetu C-249/10 P Brosmann Footwear (HK) i ostali protiv Vijeća i od 15. studenoga 2012. u predmetu C-247/10 P Zhejiang Aokang Shoes protiv Vijeća („presude Brosmann i Aokang”) Sud je ukinuo te presude.
It held that the General Court erred in law in so far as it held that the Commission was not required to examine requests for market economy treatment (‘MET’) under Article 2(7)(b) and (c) of the basic Regulation from non-sampled traders (paragraph 36 of the judgment in Case C-249/10 P and paragraph 29 and 32 of the judgment in Case C-247/10 P).
Smatrao je da je Opći sud povrijedio pravo tako što je smatrao da Komisija ne treba ispitati zahtjeve za tretman tržišnoga gospodarstva („MET”) prema članku 2. stavku 7. točkama (b) i (c) osnovne uredbe primljene od trgovaca koji nisu u uzorku (točka 36. presude u predmetu C-249/10 P i točke 29. i 32. presude u predmetu C-247/10 P).
It held that ‘the Commission ought to have examined the substantiated claims submitted to it by the appellants pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) and (c) of thebasic regulation for the purpose of claiming MET in the context of the anti-dumping proceeding [which is] the subject of the contested regulation.
Presudio je sljedeće: „Komisija je trebala ispitati potkrijepljene zahtjeve koje su joj dostavili žalitelji na temelju članka 2. stavka 7. točaka (b) i (c) Osnovne uredbe za potrebe zahtijevanja MET-a u kontekstu antidampinškog postupka [koji je] predmet sporne uredbe.
It must next be found that it cannot be ruled out that such an examination would have led to a definitive anti-dumping duty being imposed on the appellants other than the 16,5 % duty applicable to them pursuant to Article 1(3) of the contested regulation.
Zatim semora utvrditi da se ne može isključiti mogućnost da bi posljedica takvog ispitivanja bilo uvođenje konačne antidampinške pristojbe žaliteljima različite od pristojbe od 16,5 % koja se na njih primjenjuje na temelju članka 1. stavka 3.
It is apparent from that provision that a definitive anti-dumping duty of 9,7 % was imposed on the only Chinese trader in the sample which obtained MET.
Sporne uredbe.
As is apparent from paragraph 38 above, had the Commission found that the market economy conditions prevailed also for the appellants, they ought, when the calculation of an individual dumping margin was not possible, also to have benefited from the same rate’ (paragraph 42 of the judgment in Case C-249/10 P and paragraph 36 of the judgment in Case C-247/10 P).
Iz te je odredbe očito da je konačna antidampinška pristojba od 9,7 % uvedena za jedinog kineskog trgovca u uzorku kojem je dodijeljen MET.
As a consequence, it annulled the contested Regulation, in so far as it relates to the applicants concerned.
Kako je iz prethodne točke 38. očito da je Komisija utvrdila da su uvjeti tržišnog gospodarstva vrijedili i za žalitelje, i žalitelji su trebali ostvariti korist od iste te stope ako izračun pojedinačne dampinške marže nije bio moguć.” (točka 42. presude u predmetu C-249/10 P i točka 36. presude u predmetu C-247/10 P).
In October 2013, the Commission, by means of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, announced that it had decided to resume the anti-dumping proceeding at the very point at which the illegality occurred and to examine whether market economy conditions prevailed for the applicants for the period from 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005.
Stoga je Sud poništio Spornu uredbu u dijelu u kojem se odnosi na predmetne podnositelje zahtjeva.
That notice invited interested parties to come forward and make themselves known.
U listopadu 2013.
In March 2014, the Council, by Implementing Decision 2014/149/EU, rejected a Commission proposal to adopt a Council Implementing Regulation re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
Komisija je u obavijesti objavljenoj u Službenom listu Europske unije najavila da je odlučila nastaviti antidampinški postupak upravo u točki u kojoj je došlo do nezakonitosti i ispitati jesu li za podnositelje zahtjeva u razdoblju od 1. travnja 2004. do 31. ožujka 2005. prevladavali uvjeti tržišnoga gospodarstva.
Ltd and terminated the proceedings with regard to these producers.
U toj su obavijesti zainteresirane strane pozvane da se jave i iznesu svoje stavove.
The Council took the view that importers having bought shoes from those exporting producers, to whom the relevant customs duties had been reimbursed by the competent national authorities on the basis of Article 236 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (‘the Community Customs Code’), had acquired legitimate expectations on the basis of Article 1(4) of the contested Regulation, which had rendered the provisions of the Community Customs Code, and in particular its Article 221, applicable to the collection of the duties.
Vijeće je u ožujku 2014.
Three importers of the product concerned, C&J Clark International Ltd (‘Clark’), Puma SE (‘Puma’) and Timberland Europe BV (‘Timberland’) (‘the importers concerned’) challenged the anti-dumping measures on imports of certain footwear from China and Vietnam invoking the jurisprudence mentioned in recitals (5) to (7) before their national Courts, which referred the matters to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Provedbenom odlukom 2014/149/EU odbilo prijedlog Komisije o donošenju provedbene uredbe Vijeća o ponovnom uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe na određenu obuću s gornjim dijelovima od kože podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine koju su proizvela društva Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd i Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
On 4 February 2016, in the Joined Cases C-659/13 C & J Clark International Limited and C-34/14 Puma SE, the Court of Justice declared Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 invalid in so far as the European Commission did not examine the MET and individual treatment (‘IT’) claims submitted by exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam that were not sampled (‘the judgments’), contrary to the requirements laid down in Articles 2(7)(b) and 9(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Ltd i prekinulo postupak u pogledu tih proizvođača.
Regarding Case C-571/14 Timberland Europe, the Court of Justice decided on 11 April 2016 to remove the case from the register at the request of the referring national court.
Stajalište Vijeća bilo je da su uvoznici koji su kupili cipele od tih proizvođača izvoznika, kojima su nadležna nacionalna tijela nadoknadila relevantne carinske pristojbe na temelju članka 236.
Article 266 TFEU provides that the institutions must take the necessary measures to comply with the Court's judgments.
Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2913/92 o Carinskom zakoniku Zajednice („Carinski zakonik Zajednice”), imali legitimna očekivanja na temelju članka 1. stavka 4.
In case of annulment of an act adopted by the institutions in the context of an administrative procedure, such as anti-dumping, compliance with the Court's judgment consists in the replacement of the annulled act by a new act, in which the illegality identified by the Court is eliminated.
Sporne uredbe, zbog koje su odredbe Carinskog zakonika Zajednice, a posebno njegov članak 221., postale primjenjive na naplatu pristojbi.
According to the case-law of the Court, the procedure for replacing the annulled act may be resumed at the very point at which the illegality occurred.
Tri su uvoznika predmetnog proizvoda, C&J Clark International Ltd. („Clark”), Puma SE („Puma”) i Timberland Europe B.V. („Timberland”) („predmetni uvoznici”), osporavala antidampinške mjere na uvoz određene obuće iz Kine i Vijetnama pozivajući se pred svojim nacionalnim sudovima na sudsku praksu navedenu u uvodnim izjavama od 5. do 7., koji su predmete uputili Sudu na odluku o prethodnom pitanju.
That implies in particular that in a situation where an act concluding an administrative procedure is annulled, that annulment does not necessarily affect the preparatory acts, such as the initiation of the anti-dumping procedure.
Dana 4. veljače 2016. u spojenim predmetima C-659/13 C & J Clark International Limited i C-34/14 Puma SE Sud je Uredbu (EZ) br. 1472/2006 i Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 1294/2009 proglasio nevaljanima u dijelu u kojem Europska komisija nije ispitala zahtjeve za MET i individualni tretman („IT”) koje su podnijeli proizvođači izvoznici iz NRK-a i Vijetnama koji nisu uključeni u uzorak („presude”), što je protivno zahtjevima utvrđenima u članku 2. stavku 7. točki (b) i članku 9. stavku 5.
In a situation where a regulation imposing definitive anti-dumping measures is annulled, that means that, subsequent to the annulment, the anti-dumping proceeding is still open, because the act concluding the anti-dumping proceeding has disappeared from the Union legal order, except if the illegality occurred at the stage of initiation.
Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 384/96 od 22. prosinca 1995. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske zajednice.
Apart from the fact that the institutions did not examine the MET and IT claims submitted by exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam that were not sampled, all other findings made Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 remain valid.
U pogledu predmeta C-571/14, Timberland Europe, Sud je 11. travnja 2016. odlučio obrisati taj predmet iz registra na zahtjev nacionalnog suda koji mu ga je uputio.
In the present case, the illegality occurred after initiation.
U članku 266.
Hence, the Commission decided to resume the present anti-dumping proceeding that was still open following the judgments at the very point at which the illegality occurred and to examine whether market economy conditions prevailed for the exporting producers concerned for the period from 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005, which was the investigation period (‘investigation period’).
UFEU-a propisuje se da institucije moraju poduzeti potrebne mjere kako bi postupile u skladu s presudama Suda.
The Commission also examined, where appropriate, whether the exporting producers concerned qualified for IT in accordance with 9(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (the ‘basic Regulation prior to its amendment’).
U slučaju poništenja akta koji su donijele institucije u kontekstu administrativnog postupka, kao što je antidamping, usklađenost s presudom Suda sastoji se od zamjene poništenog akta novim aktom, iz kojeg je izbačena nezakonitost koju je utvrdio Sud.
By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395, the Commission re-imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty and collected definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of Clark and Puma of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the PRC and produced by thirteen Chinese exporting producers that have submitted MET and IT claims but that had not been sampled.
Prema sudskoj praksi Suda postupak za zamjenu poništenog akta može se nastaviti u točki u kojoj je došlo do nezakonitosti.
By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647, the Commission re-imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty and collected definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of Clark, Puma and Timberland of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and produced by certain Vietnamese exporting producers that had submitted MET and IT claims, but had not been sampled.
Pod time se posebno razumijeva da, ako se poništi akt kojim se zaključuje neki administrativni postupak, to poništenje ne utječe nužno na pripremne akte kao što je pokretanje antidampinškog postupka.