natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 833/2014 o mjerama ograničavanja s obzirom na djelovanja Rusije kojima se destabilizira stanje u Ukrajini
Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2214 of 30 November 2017 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine [1],
uzimajući u obzir Odluku Vijeća (ZVSP) 2017/2214 od 30. studenoga 2017. o izmjeni Odluke 2014/512/ZVSP o mjerama ograničavanja s obzirom na djelovanja Rusije kojima se destabilizira stanje u Ukrajini [1],
On 30 November 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/2214 in order to permit certain operations concerning hydrazine (CAS 302-01-2) in concentrations of 70 % or more, which is included in the Common Military List of the European Union, necessary for the flight of the ExoMars carrier module and tests and flight of the ExoMars descent module in the framework of the ExoMars 2020 mission.
Te su izmjene obuhvaćene područjem primjene Ugovora i stoga su, osobito kako bi se osigurala njihova ujednačena provedba u svim državama članicama, potrebne regulatorne mjere na razini Unije.
The amendments fall within the scope of the Treaty and, therefore, in particular with a view to ensuring their uniform application in all Member States, regulatory action at the level of the Union is necessary.
Uredbu (EU) br. 833/2014 trebalo bi stoga s tim u skladu izmijeniti,
Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,
DONIJELO JE OVU UREDBU:
Article 1
Članak 4.
Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 is amended as follows:
Uredbe (EU) br. 833/2014 mijenja se kako slijedi:
The prohibitions in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 shall not apply to the provision, directly or indirectly, of technical assistance, financing or financial assistance related to the sale, supply, transfer or export and the import, purchase or transport of hydrazine (CAS 302-01-2) in concentrations of 70 % or more, provided that that technical assistance, financing or financial assistance refers to hydrazine destined for:
Zabrane iz stavka 1. točaka (a) i (b) ne primjenjuju se na izravno ili neizravno pružanje tehničke pomoći, financiranja ili financijske pomoći u vezi s prodajom, opskrbom, prijenosom ili izvozom te uvozom, kupnjom ili prijevozom hidrazina (CAS 302-01-2) koncentracije 70 % ili veće, uz uvjet da se ta tehnička pomoć, financiranje ili financijska pomoć odnosi na hidrazin namijenjen za:
the tests and flight of the ExoMars descent module in the framework of the ExoMars 2020 mission, in an amount calculated in accordance with the needs of each phase of that mission, which does not exceed a total of 5000 kg for the entire duration of the mission; or
ispitivanje i let ExoMars Descent Module u okviru misije ExoMars 2020., u količini izračunanoj u skladu s potrebama svake faze te misije, koja ukupno ne premašuje 5000 kg za cjelokupno trajanje misije; ili
the flight of the ExoMars carrier module in the framework of the ExoMars 2020 mission, in an amount calculated in accordance with the needs of the flight, which does not exceed a total of 300 kg.’.
let ExoMars Carrier Module u okviru misije ExoMars 2020., u količini izračunanoj u skladu s potrebama leta, koja ukupno ne premašuje 300 kg.”
Paragraph 2b is replaced by the following:
2.
The provision, directly or indirectly, of technical assistance, financing or financial assistance, related to the operations referred to in paragraphs 2a and 2aa shall be subject to prior authorisation by the competent authorities.
Stavak 2.b zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Applicants for authorisation shall supply the competent authorities with all relevant information required.
Izravno ili neizravno pružanje tehničke pomoći, financiranja ili financijske pomoći u vezi s operacijama navedenima u stavcima 2.a i 2.aa podliježe prethodnoj dozvoli nadležnih tijela.
The competent authorities shall inform the Commission of all the authorisations granted.’.
Podnositelji zahtjeva za izdavanje dozvole nadležnim tijelima dostavljaju sve relevantne informacije koje su potrebne.
Article 2
Nadležna tijela obavješćuju Komisiju o svim izdanim dozvolama.”
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2017.
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
See page 20 of this Official Journal.
Predsjednica
Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 1).
Vidjeti str.
Whereas:
20. ovoga Službenog lista.
On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 [2].
Uredba Vijeća (EU) br. 833/2014 od 31. srpnja 2014. o mjerama ograničavanja s obzirom na djelovanja Rusije kojima se destabilizira stanje u Ukrajini (SL L 229, 31.7.2014., str. 1.).
amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of slightly modified certain aluminium foil
o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2017/271 o proširenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe uvedene Uredbom Vijeća (EZ) br. 925/2009 na uvoz određene aluminijske folije podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine na uvoz neznatno izmijenjene određene aluminijske folije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] and in particular Article 13 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije [1], a posebno njezin članak 13.,
With Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on aluminium foil originating in Armenia, Brazil and China.
Uredbom (EZ) br. 925/2009 [2] Vijeće je uvelo konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na aluminijsku foliju podrijetlom iz Armenije, Brazila i Kine.
With Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 [3] the Commission extended the measures on 17 December 2015 for another 5 years for exports from China only and terminated the measures for Brazil.
Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2015/2384 [3] Komisija je 17. prosinca 2015. na još pet godina produljila mjere za izvoz samo iz Kine i ukinula mjere za Brazil.
Article 1(1) of the Regulation refers to Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 when extending the applicable anti-dumping duties to the slightly modified certain aluminium foil.
U članku 1. stavku 1.
However, as the measures are not in force any more for Armenia and Brazil, the correct reference should have been the legal basis for the measures in force for China only, namely Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384.
Uredbe upućuje se na Uredbu (EZ) br. 925/2009 pri proširenju primjenjivih antidampinških pristojbi na neznatno izmijenjene određene aluminijske folije.
Therefore, it is appropriate to amend Article 1(1) of the Regulation retro-actively by a reference to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 instead of Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009.
Međutim, s obzirom na to da mjere više nisu na snazi za Armeniju i Brazil, ispravno upućivanje trebalo je biti pravna osnova za mjere koje su na snazi samo za Kinu, odnosno Provedbena uredba (EU) 2015/2384.
In order to limit the risk of circumvention, Article 1(3) of the Regulation states that the application of exemptions granted to the companies specifically mentioned in paragraph 2 of the same Article shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice.
Stoga je primjereno retroaktivno izmijeniti članak 1. stavak 1.
This commercial invoice must conform to the requirements set out in Article 1(3) of the Regulation.
Uredbe upućivanjem na Provedbenu uredbu Komisije (EU) 2015/2384 umjesto na Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 925/2009.
Since the entering into force of the Regulation this commercial invoice generated difficulties with national customs services as it can only be issued by the manufacturer.
Kako bi se ograničio rizik od izbjegavanja mjera, u članku 1. stavku 3.
However, the underlying investigation revealed that, normally, those exporting producers listed in Article 1(2) of the Regulation export via unrelated traders.
Uredbe navodi se da se primjena izuzeća za trgovačka društva koja su izričito navedena u stavku 2. istog članka uvjetuje predočenjem valjanog računa carinskim tijelima država članica.
Thus, they cannot meet this requirement without significant disruption to their business practices.
Taj račun mora biti u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 1. stavka 3.
Indeed, if these economic operators were required to meet the requirements of Article 1(3) of the Regulation, they would be forced to change their sales channels and start selling their products directly to the Union, because maintaining their current sales channels, i.e. selling via unrelated traders may result in them being subjected to the anti-dumping duty rate imposed by Article 1(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384.
Uredbe.
The exporting producers listed in Article 1(2) of the Regulation are producers of aluminium converter foil.
Od stupanja na snagu Uredbe taj je račun stvarao poteškoće s nacionalnim carinskim službama jer ga može izdati samo proizvođač.
Aluminium converter foil has different technical characteristics, different distribution channels, and end-use than the product concerned by the Regulation.
Međutim osnovni ispitni postupak pokazao je da proizvođači izvoznici navedeni u članku 1. stavku 2.
It is not in competition with the product concerned, nor was it intended to be part of the product scope, but could not be excluded from the product definition for reasons explained in recitals 60 to 72 in the Regulation.
Uredbe obično izvoze preko nepovezanih trgovaca.
Furthermore, these exporting producers had been verified onspot as explained in recital 80 of the Regulation, and it was established that they had not in the past produced the product concerned by the Regulation.
Stoga oni ne mogu ispuniti taj zahtjev bez znatnog remećenja svoje poslovne prakse.
Therefore the Commission considers that there is a limited risk that these exporting producers would try to circumvent the measures in the future.
Doista, kada bi se od tih gospodarskih subjekata tražilo da ispune zahtjeve iz članka 1. stavka 3.
The Commission came to the conclusion that it would be unduly burdensome to request the exempted companies listed in Article 1(2) of the Regulation to change their usual business operation and start selling directly to the Union.
Uredbe, oni bi bili prisiljeni promijeniti svoje prodajne kanale i započeti izravno prodavati svoje proizvode u Uniju jer bi zadržavanje trenutačnih prodajnih kanala, odnosno prodaje preko nepovezanih trgovaca, moglo dovesti do toga da podliježu stopi antidampinške pristojbe uvedene člankom 1. stavkom 2.
Against this background, it is appropriate to remove this requirement from the Regulation.
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2384.
Thus, exporting producers listed in Article 1(2) of the Regulation will not be obliged to issue such a commercial invoice.
Proizvođači izvoznici navedeni u članku 1. stavku 2.
In any case, the removal of this requirement should not prevent customs authorities from performing additional checks concerning the shipment in question, in line with the risk profile associated with the import concerned, until they can satisfy themselves that the manufacturer declared on the documents is correct.
Uredbe proizvođači su aluminijske konverterske folije.
In order to provide legal certainty to economic operators, it is furthermore appropriate that these amendments apply with retroactive effect as from the date of entry into force of the Regulation.
Aluminijska konverterska folija ima drukčija tehnička svojstva, drukčije kanale distribucije i krajnju uporabu od predmetnog proizvoda iz Uredbe.
This is in line with the existing case law of the European Courts, given that the amendment has been made in a reasonable period of time, so that no legitimate expectations were created for the economic operators concerned.
Ona ne predstavlja konkurenciju predmetnom proizvodu niti je trebala biti dioopsega proizvoda, ali nije mogla biti izostavljena iz definicije proizvoda iz razloga objašnjenih u uvodnim izjavama od 60. do 72.
In any case, economic operators exporting to the Union will not have their businesses unduly affected, as the deletion of this requirement creates legal certainty for the purposes of importing into the Union for both exporting producers from China as well as importers in the Union [5].
Uredbe.
On 7 August 2017, the Commission disclosed to all interested parties the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it deemed the present amendment necessary, and invited them to comment.
Nadalje, ti proizvođači izvoznici provjereni su na licu mjesta kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 80.
The applicant who lodged the request for the extension of the duties objected the Commission's proposal to remove the requirement to present a commercial invoice issued by the manufacturer.
Uredbe i ustanovljeno je da u prošlosti nisu proizvodili predmetni proizvod iz Uredbe.
It argued in particular that by removing this requirement, the Commission would be creating a risk of additional circumvention, and therefore, additional uncertainties for the Union aluminium foil industry.
Stoga Komisija smatra da je rizik da bi ti proizvođači izvoznici u budućnosti pokušali zaobići mjere ograničen.
As explained in recital 8, the removal of this requirement would not prevent customs authorities from performing additional checks to verify whether the manufacturer declared on the documents was correct.
Komisija je zaključila da bi bilo neopravdano opterećenje od izuzetih društava navedenih u članku 1. stavku 2.
If anything it would encourage the customs authorities to carry out additional checks in case of doubts that the consignments in question really comes from an exempted companies.
Uredbe zahtijevati da promijene svoje uobičajeno poslovanje i započnu prodavati izravno u Uniju.
Furthermore these exempted exporting producers were not involved in circumvention practice in the past, they do not produce the product concerned, and the customers of the aluminium converter foil are different from the customer of the product concerned.
S obzirom na ovo pojašnjenje primjereno je ukloniti taj zahtjev iz Uredbe.
The Commission therefore concluded that the removal of the requirement to produce such a commercial invoice did not create additional risk of circumvention and rejected the claim.
Stoga proizvođači izvoznici navedeni u članku 1. stavku 2.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Uredbe neće biti obvezni izdavati takav račun.
In view of the above and pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 should be amended accordingly,
U svakom slučaju, uklanjanje tog zahtjeva ne bi trebalo spriječiti carinska tijela da provedu dodatne provjere predmetne pošiljke u skladu s profilom rizičnosti povezanim s predmetnim uvozom kako bi se uvjerili da je proizvođač naveden na dokumentima ispravan.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost za gospodarske subjekte primjereno je i da se te izmjene primjenjuju s retroaktivnim učinkom od datuma stupanja na snagu Uredbe.
Article 1
To je u skladu s postojećom sudskom praksom sudova Europske unije pod uvjetom da je izmjena napravljena u razumnom roku kako ne bi došlo do opravdanih očekivanja predmetnih gospodarskih subjekata.
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 is amended as follows:
U svakom slučaju, to neće neopravdano utjecati na poslovanje gospodarskih subjekata koji izvoze u Uniju jer se brisanjem tog zahtjeva omogućuje pravna sigurnost za potrebe uvoza u Uniju i za proizvođače izvoznike iz Kine i za uvoznike u Uniji [5].
Article 1(1) is replaced by the following:
Komisija je 7. kolovoza 2017. svim zainteresiranim stranama objavila bitne činjenice i razmatranja na temelju kojih je zaključila da je ova izmjena potrebna te ih je pozvala da dostave primjedbe.
‘Article 1
Podnositelj koji je zatražio produljenje pristojbi prigovorio je Komisijinu prijedlogu za uklanjanje zahtjeva o podnošenju računa koji je izdao proizvođač.
The definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to “all other companies” imposed by Article 1(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China is hereby extended to imports into the Union of:
Tvrdio je osobito da bi uklanjanjem tog zahtjeva Komisija stvorila rizik dodatnog izbjegavanja mjera, a time i dodatnu nesigurnost za industriju aluminijske folije u Uniji.
aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,007 mm and less than 0,008 mm, regardless of the width of the rolls, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex76071119 (TARIC code 7607111930), or
Kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 8., uklanjanje tog zahtjeva ne sprečava carinska tijela da provedu dodatne provjere kako bi utvrdila je li proizvođač naveden na dokumentima bio ispravan.
aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm and in rolls of a width exceeding 650 mm, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex76071119 (TARIC code 7607111940), or
Time bi se čak moglo potaknuti carinska tijela na provođenje dodatnih provjera u slučaju sumnji da predmetne pošiljke zapravo dolaze iz izuzetih društava.
aluminium foil of a thickness of more than 0,018 mm and less than 0,021 mm, regardless of the width of the rolls, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex76071119 (TARIC code 7607111950), or
Nadalje, ti izuzeti proizvođači izvoznici u prošlosti nisu bili uključeni u praksu izbjegavanja mjera i ne proizvode predmetni proizvod, a kupci aluminijske konverterske folije nisu isti kao kupci predmetnog proizvoda.
aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,021 mm and not more than 0,045 mm, when presented with at least two layers, regardless of the width of the rolls, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex76071190 (TARIC codes 7607119045 and 7607119080).’;
Komisija je stoga zaključila da se ukidanjem zahtjeva o podnošenju takvog računa ne bi stvorio dodatni rizik izbjegavanja mjera i odbacila tvrdnju.
Article 1(3) is deleted.
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora uspostavljenog člankom 15. stavkom 1.
Article 2
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
This Regulation shall enter into force with retroactive effect as from 18 February 2017.
S obzirom na prethodno navedeno i u skladu s člankom 13.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2017.
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036, članak 1.
For the Commission
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/271 trebalo bi na odgovarajući način izmijeniti,
Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 of 24 September 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Armenia, Brazil and the People's Republic of China (OJ L 262, 6.10.2009, p.
Provedbena uredba (EU) 2017/271 mijenja se kako slijedi:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 of 17 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the proceeding for imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Brazil following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 332, 18.12.2015, p. 63).
Članak 1. stavak 1. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 of 16 February 2017 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of slightly modified certain aluminium foil (OJ L 40, 17.2.2017, p.
„Članak 1.
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/EC [1], and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 2111/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 14. prosinca 2005. o uspostavi liste Zajednice koja sadrži zračne prijevoznike na koje se primjenjuje zabrana letenja unutar Zajednice, o informiranju putnika u zračnom prometu o identitetu zračnog prijevoznika koji obavlja let i stavljanju izvan snage članka 9.
Whereas:
Direktive 2004/36/EZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 4. stavak 2.,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 [2] established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
budući da:
In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, certain Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that list.
Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 474/2006 [2] uspostavljen je popis zračnih prijevoznika na koje se primjenjuje zabrana letenja unutar Unije iz poglavlja II.
Relevant information was also communicated by third countries and international organisations.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2111/2005.
On the basis of that information, the list should be updated.
U skladu s člankom 4. stavkom 3.
The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose an operating ban on them within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the list.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 2111/2005 određene države članice i Europska agencija za sigurnost zračnog prometa („EASA”) dostavile su Komisiji informacije koje su relevantne u kontekstu ažuriranja tog popisa.
The Commission gave the air carriers concerned the opportunity to consult the documents provided by the Member States, to submit written comments and to make an oral presentation to the Commission and to the Committee established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 [3] (the ‘Air Safety Committee’).
Treće zemlje i međunarodne organizacije također su dostavile relevantne informacije.
The Commission has updated the Air Safety Committee on the on-going joint consultations, in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 473/2006 [4], with the competent authorities and air carriers of Equatorial Guinea, Nepal, Nigeria, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Thailand,Ukraine and Venezuela.
Popis je potrebno ažurirati na temelju tih informacija.
The Commission also provided information to the Air Safety Committee on the aviation safety situation in Afghanistan, Bolivia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Libya, Moldova, Mozambique and Zambia, and on technical consultations with Russia.
Komisija je izravno ili preko nadležnih tijela odgovornih za njihov regulatorni nadzor obavijestila sve predmetne zračne prijevoznike o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima koji čine osnovu za donošenje odluke da se za njih uvede zabrana letenja unutar Unije ili izmijene uvjeti zabrane letenja koja je uvedena za zračnog prijevoznika s popisa.