natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Marketing costs were not calculated on a per passenger basis, but were estimated, in total, to be EUR […] in the best case and EUR […] in the worst case.
Odluka Komisije C(2013) 3546 final od 19. lipnja 2013., SA.36197(N/2013) – Portugal Privatizacija društva ANA – Aeroportos de Portugal, SL C 256, 5.9.2013., str. 3.; predmet C-40/85 Belgija protiv Komisije, ECLI:EU:C:1986:305.
(315) Table 13 shows that revenues stemming from the 2000 Agreement were expected to exceed costs, leading to an annual surplus of EUR […] in the best case and EUR […] in the worst case.
Predmet C-482/99 Francuska protiv Komisije („Stardust Marine”) ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, točka 71.
The Commission finds the approach taken by Germany sound.
Vrednovanje društva Berenberg Consult GmbH (društva kći društva Hamburger Privatbank Berenberg).
The estimated average aeronautical revenues were based on the terms of the 2000 Agreement with Ryanair.
[55] Vidjeti točku 403.
The non-aeronautical revenues were expected to be […] % of the aeronautical revenue, which seems to be in line with general expectations as regards non-aeronautical revenues at other airports (see Table 6).
izvješća Europske komisije o politici tržišnog natjecanja, 1993.; točku 4.2.3.1.
The assumption that the staff number would need to be increased when passenger numbers increase also seems reasonable.
Obavijesti Komisije o pojmu državne potpore iz članka 107. stavka 1.
The Commission notes that investments related to the expansion of Lübeck airport were not specific to Ryanair but could potentially be exploited by other airlines.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL C 262, 19.7.2016., str. 1.).
This indicates that investment costs did not have to be included in the incremental costs of the Ryanair agreement.
Vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točku 53.
In this respect, the Commission notes that Germany emphasised that FLG continuously attempted to attract other airlines and succeeded in this attempt by attracting other airlines (such as Wizz Air).
Vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točku 59.
In addition, according to Germany, Lübeck airport unsuccessfully tried to initiate negotiations for an agreement with Air Berlin for years.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije 2011/60/EU od 27. siječnja 2010. o državnoj potpori C 12/2008 (ex NN 74/07) – Slovačka – Ugovor između zračne luke Bratislava i zračnog prijevoznika Ryanair, uvodne izjave 88. i 89.
Germany submitted that in order to successfully privatise Lübeck airport, it was necessary to significantly increase passenger numbers.
(SL L 27, 1.2.2011., str. 24.).
The Commission accepts that investments were made to prepare Lübeck airport for higher passenger numbers [72].
Vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točke 57. do 59.
The Commission further notes that the 2000 Agreement did not require FLG to make investments [73].
Vidjeti u pogledu određivanja referentne vrijednosti s obzirom na profitabilnost (umjesto s obzirom na cijene) u sektoru spojene predmete T-319/12 i T-321/12 Španjolska i Ciudad de la Luz protiv Komisije ECLI:EU:T:2014:604, točku 44.
FLG could have fulfilled its obligations under the contract without investing in an expansion of the airport.
Za druge kriterije koji se ocjenjuju vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točku 60.
In the light of those considerations, the Commission concludes that Germany's approach not to attribute investments made at Lübeck airport to the agreement with Ryanair is reasonable.
Vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točke 59. i 63.
Having analysed the information provided by Germany, the Commission disagrees however on one point of the analysis and amends it accordingly.
Vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točku 63.
The 2000 Agreement sets out as its end date 30 May 2010.
Vidjeti Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točku 64.
Germany took into account incremental costs and revenues for the years 2011 and 2012 when calculating the incremental profitability of the 2000 Agreement.
Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014., točka 64.; Odluka Komisije (EU) 2015/1226 od 23. srpnja 2014. o državnoj potpori SA.33963 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) koju je provela Francuska u korist Trgovačke i industrijske komore Angoulêmea te društava SNC-Lavalin, Ryanair i Airport Marketing Services (SL L 201, 30.7.2015., str. 48.); Odluka Komisije (EU) 2015/1584 od 1. listopada 2014. o državnoj potpori SA.23098 (C 37/07) (ex NN 36/07) koju je provela Italija u korist društva Società di Gestione dell'Aeroporto di Alghero So.Ge.A.AL S.p.A. i različitih zračnih prijevoznika koji obavljaju usluge prijevoza iz zračne luke Alghero (SL L 250, 25.9.2015., str. 38.); Odluka Komisije (EU) 2016/2069 od 1. listopada 2014. o mjerama SA.14093 (C 76/2002) koje je poduzela Belgija u korist društava Brussels South Charleroi Airport i Ryanair (SL L 325, 30.11.2016., str. 63.).
The Commission considers that it is appropriate to take only into account the incremental costs and revenues generated over the duration of the contract.
Predmet T-196/04 Ryanair protiv Komisije („Charleroi”) ECLI:EU:T:2008:585, točka 59.
In view of this necessary amendment, the Commission has carried out its own analysis by using directly the incremental profitability analysis submitted by Germany and amending this analysis where necessary as summarised in Tables 14, 15 and 16:
Predmet C-305/89, Talijanska Republika protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica (Alfa Romeo) ECLI:EU:C:1991:142.
Table 14
Izvješće je prethodno spomenuto u odjeljku 7.3.1.1. u pogledu profitabilnosti ugovora koji su sklopili Hansestadt Lübeck i Infratil.
Table 15
Vidjeti Odluku (EU) 2015/1226.
Table 16
Odluka (EU) 2015/1584.
The Commission has taken out the revenues and operating costs expected for the years 2011 and 2012, as in those years, the 2000 Agreement was expected to have expired already (see Tables 14 and 15).
Izvješće društva Oxera, ekonomska ocjena načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu: zračna luka Lübeck, 1. rujna 2014.
The Commission relied instead on the revenues and operating costs expected for the years 2000-2010, resulting in the revenues and operating costs presented in Table 16.
Predmet T-210/02 RENV British Aggregates Association protiv Komisije, ECLI:EU:T:2012:110, točke 82. i 83.; spojeni predmeti C-106/09 P i C-107/09 P Komisija i Španjolska protiv Vlade Gibraltara i Ujedinjene Kraljevine EU:C:2011:732, točke 74. i 75.; predmet C-518/13 Eventech protiv The Parking Adjudicator, ECLI:EU:C:2015:9, točke 54. i 55.
As to the marketing costs, the Commission calculated the average marketing costs per passenger that could have been expected in the best case and in the worst case scenario according to the information provided by Germany.
Predmet C-524/14 P Komisija protiv Hansestadt Lübeck, ECLI:EU:C:2016:971, točka 62.
It then multiplied the average marketing costs per passenger with the number of passengers that could have been expected for the years 2000-2010, resulting in an expected marketing costs of EUR […] in the best case scenario, and EUR […] in the worst case scenario (see Table 16).
Komisija je 2002., 2003., 2004., 2005. i 2006. primila nekoliko pritužbi zračnog prijevoznika Air Berlin, jedne nevladine organizacije za zaštitu okoliša (Bund Umwelt und Naturschutz) i privatnih građana koje su se odnosile na navodnu državnu potporu društvima Flughafen Lübeck GmbH („FLG”) i Infratil Limited („Infratil”) [3] te zračnom prijevozniku Ryanair [4].
Finally, while the ex ante analysis undertaken by FLG and submitted by Germany did not discount the future payments to the date on which the contract was concluded, it is clear from the figures provided that the contract was expected to be profitable.
Komisija je 7. studenoga 2005. od Njemačke zatražila informacije koje je Njemačka dostavila 7. veljače 2006.
In addition to the data provided by Germany, Oxera has submitted a profitability analysis of the 2000 Agreement [74].
Dodatne informacije zatražene su dopisom od 22. ožujka 2006., na koji je Njemačka odgovorila 12. lipnja 2006.
Oxera used outturn data, i.e. data on the actual costs and revenues incurred, from the period prior to the agreement, where possible, to deduct assumptions about FLG's expectations at the time of signing the agreement.
Službe Komisije, Infratil, većinski vlasnik društva koje je upravitelj zračne luke, i hanzeatski grad Lübeck („Hansestadt Lübeck”) održali su sastanke 14. listopada i 4. prosinca 2006.
Oxera calculated passenger numbers based on outturn data up until the point of signing the agreement.
Komisija je dopisom od 10. srpnja 2007. obavijestila Njemačku o svojoj odluci o pokretanju postupka predviđenog člankom 108. stavkom 2.
The NPV of the 2000 Agreement with Ryanair was estimated to be EUR […].
Ispravak Odluke o pokretanju postupka iz 2007. donesen je 24. listopada 2007.
Therefore the agreement was expected to be profitable.
Odluka o pokretanju postupka iz 2007. objavljena je u Službenom listu Europske unije [5] 29. studenoga 2007.
Oxera calculated the NPV without attributing investment costs to the 2000 Ryanair agreement.
Ispravak je objavljen 7. prosinca 2007.
This is in line with the Commission's finding (see recitals 316 to 320) that investments made at Lübeck airport did not have to be attributed to the 2000 Agreement.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strane da podnesu primjedbe na predmetne mjere u roku od jednog mjeseca od dana objave.
The Commission notes that Oxera used ex ante available data for the calculation of passenger numbers, aeronautical revenues and marketing charges but based its assessment of non-aeronautical revenues and operating costs on ex post data.
Komisija je primila primjedbe društava Ryanair, Air Berlin, Infratil i FLG, dviju nevladinih organizacija [7], Industrijske i trgovinske komore grada Lübecka (IHK Lübeck) [8], udruženja njemačkih zračnih prijevoznika (Bundesverband der Deutschen Fluggesellschaften – „BDF”) i pojedinaca [9].
Oxera stated that it did not have access to ex ante projections of non-aeronautical revenues and operating costs.
Njemačka je na te primjedbe odgovorila 17. travnja 2008.
The Commission notes that only revenues and costs that the airport expected to incur ex ante, at the time when it entered into the agreement with the respective airline, can be taken into account for assessing whether such agreement was in line with the MEO principle.
Neovisni savjetnik Komisije Ecorys od Njemačke je 24. srpnja 2008. zatražio informacije kako bi mogao sastaviti izvješće o tom pitanju.
An assessment partially based on ex post data can, however, serve to support the validation of the assumptions taken to determine the ex ante expected revenues and costs.
Njemačka se 1. kolovoza 2008. obratila Komisiji kako bi osporila pravo društva Ecorys na dobivanje informacija i dokumenata.
Indeed, the ex ante data reconstructed by Oxera as regards aeronautic revenues (EUR […]) lies between the ex ante expected aeronautic revenues of FLG submitted by Germany in the best case (EUR […]) and the worst case scenario (EUR […]).
U skladu s tim zatražene informacije dobivene su 18. rujna 2008.
The ex ante data reconstructed by Oxera as regards marketing costs (EUR […]) is even lower than the one submitted by Germany: FLG expected ex ante marketing costs of EUR […] in the best case and of EUR […] in the worst case.
Komisija je 16. travnja 2009. zatražila dodatne informacije od Njemačke.
This confirms that the ex ante expectation of FLG was sufficiently conservative.
Njemačka je zatražila produljenje roka 21. travnja 2009. i ponovno 7. srpnja 2009.
The information provided by Germany indicates that FLG could have expected a positive incremental return on the 2000 Agreement.
Zatražene informacije dostavljene su 30. listopada 2009.
The assumptions on which that expectation were based appear reasonable.
Komisija je 29. listopada 2009. zatražila dodatne informacije, koje je Njemačka dostavila 16. prosinca 2009.
This is supported by the fact that the expected growth of passenger numbers was outperformed by the real growth during the years 2000-2005.
Komisija je 17. listopada 2010. primila informacije od zračnog prijevoznika Air Berlin.
The limits to the growth of the passenger number were largely due to the impossibility to obtain the planning approval and to enlarge the airport, which were not foreseeable at the time of the conclusion of the 2000 Agreement.
Komisija je 20. travnja 2011. odobrila zahtjev Njemačke za produljenje.
The expectations of FLG are supported by the study provided by Oxera.
Njemačka je 21. travnja 2011. zatražila dodatno produljenje roka, koje je Komisija odobrila 27. travnja 2011.
(329) It could therefore have been reasonably expected that the 2000 Agreement with Ryanair would be incrementally profitable for FLG.
Komisija je odgovorila 15. lipnja 2011. i zatražila informacije koje nedostaju.
Consequently, an MEO would have entered into the agreement, since it incrementally contributed, from an ex ante point of view, to the profitability of the airport.
Komisija je 8. travnja 2011. poslala upitnik prijevozniku Ryanair.
Similarly, in view of the clearly positive contribution the 2000 Agreement can also be considered to be part of the implementation of an overall strategy to lead to profitability at least in the long term.
Odgovori su joj vraćeni do 4. srpnja 2011.
The 2000 Agreement between FLG and Ryanair therefore does not confer an economic advantage that Ryanair would not have obtained under normal market conditions.
Komisija je te podneske proslijedila Njemačkoj 18. srpnja 2011. i pozvala je da podnese primjedbe do 18. kolovoza 2011.
Therefore, it does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Komisija je 7. veljače 2012. zatražila dodatne informacije od prijevoznika Ryanair o studiji društva Oxera koju je Ryanair dostavio 4. srpnja 2011.
This finding is without any prejudice to the assessment of whether the 2010 Agreements involved State aid to Ryanair.
Društvo Oxera zatražilo je 16. veljače 2012. od Komisije pojašnjenje jednog od postavljenih pitanja.
CHARGES FOR THE DE-ICING OF AIRCRAFTS
Komisija je to pojašnjenje dostavila 17. veljače 2012.
Selectivity
Ryanair je 13. travnja 2012. poslao svoje primjedbe.
To fall within the scope of Article 107(1) TFEU, a State measure must favour ‘certain undertakings or the production of certain goods’.
Komisija je te primjedbe poslala Njemačkoj 27. lipnja 2012.
Hence, only those measures favouring undertakings which grant an advantage in a selective way fall under the notion of State aid.
Njemačka je u dopisu od 10. rujna 2012. podnijela primjedbe na podneske prijevoznika Ryanair.
According to case law of the European Courts, it needs to be determined whether under a particular statutory scheme (the ‘system of reference’), a State measure is such as to favour ‘certain undertakings or the production of certain goods’ in comparison with other undertakings which are in a legal and factual situation that is comparable in the light of the objective pursued by the measure in question.
Završno izvješće društva Ecorys od 29. ožujka 2011. poslano je Njemačkoj 29. lipnja 2011., uz poziv Njemačkoj na podnošenje primjedbi.
A measure which differentiates between undertakings in a comparable situation would be prima facie selective.
Prijevod izvješća poslan je Njemačkoj 24. kolovoza 2011., a Njemačka je pozvana da podnese primjedbe do 26. rujna 2011.
If a prima facie selective measure is justified by the nature or general scheme of the system, it will not be considered selective and will thus fall outside the scope of Article 107(1) TFEU [75].
Njemačka je 10. listopada 2011. poslala svoje primjedbe.
The Commission therefore has to undertake a three-step-analysis: First, the system of reference needs to be determined.
Njemačka je 30. lipnja 2011. poslala drugi dio informacija koje je zatražila Komisija.
Second, it should be determined whether a given measure constitutes a derogation from that system insofar as it differentiates between economic operators who, in light of the objectives intrinsic to the system, are in a comparable factual and legal situation.
Njemačka je na dopis Komisije od 15. lipnja 2011. odgovorila 29. lipnja 2011.
If such a derogation exists (and therefore the measure is prima facie selective), it needs to be established, in the third step of the test, whether the derogation is justified by the nature or the general scheme of the system.
Komisija je 5. srpnja 2011. od Njemačke zatražila da dostavi informacije koje nedostaju.
In the case at hand, the Commission opened the formal investigation procedure in relation to the charges for the de-icing of aircrafts.
Njemačka je 15. srpnja 2011. dostavila te informacije.
First, the Commission has to determine the system of reference under which the charges for de-icing are to be assessed.
Ryanair je 4. srpnja 2011.
In this context, the Commission notes that the charges for de-icing of aircrafts at the airport are laid down in a scheme of special charges.
Komisiji poslao primjedbe, koje su 8. kolovoza 2011. proslijeđene Njemačkoj.
While such scheme of special charges is not part of the general schedule of charges for infrastructure use, the scheme of special charges has certain features in common with the general schedule of charges: the scheme of special charges sets out prices for certain services provided by the airport to airlines and prices for material needed for such services.
Njemačka je 8. listopada 2011. podnijela primjedbe na te podneske.
It applies to all airlines using the airport.
Njemačka je 19. ožujka 2012. zatražila produljenje roka za dostavu informacija do 17. travnja 2012.
It is adapted every few years to cater for changes in the costs of the special services.
Komisija je to odobrila 21. ožujka 2012.
In particular, the airport alone is competent to draw up the scheme of special charges.
Komisija je 18. travnja 2012. od Njemačke zatražila da do 28. travnja 2012. dostavi informacije koje nedostaju, bez mogućnosti produljenja roka.
In its Lübeck judgment, the Court of Justice held that the 2006 schedule of charges of Lübeck airport was to be considered as reference system [76].
Komisija je, nadalje, navela da će, u suprotnom, izdati nalog za dostavljanje podataka u skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 3.
In light of the similarities between the general schedule of charges and the scheme of special charges, the Commission concludes that the scheme of special charges at Lübeck airport has to be considered the reference framework under which the charges for de-icing of aircrafts at Lübeck airport are to be assessed.
Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 659/1999 [10].
Second, the Commission has to assess whether the scheme of special charges differentiates between economic operators who are in a comparable factual and legal situation.
Komisija i Njemačka održale su sastanak 2. svibnja 2012.
The Commission observes that the scheme of special charges applies to all airlines using Lübeck airport.
Komisija je 3. svibnja 2012. pristala na produljenje roka do 11. svibnja 2012.
When using the de-icing services for aircrafts, the scheme of special charges does not differentiate between the different airlines.
U dopisu od 10. travnja 2013.
Indeed, every aircraft de-iced at Lübeck airport is subject to the same charges, which depend on the take-off weight of the aircraft as well as the amount of de-icing liquid and hot water used.
Ryanair je Komisiji poslao izvješće o pristupu društva Oxera načelu subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
Therefore, the charges for the de-icing of aircrafts at Lübeck airport do not derogate from the system of reference, because they do not differentiate between airlines using the airport.
Izvješće je poslano Njemačkoj 3. svibnja 2013.
The Commission concludes that the de-icing charges are, prima facie, not selective.
Dodatni podnesci prijevoznika Ryanair poslani su Komisiji 20. prosinca 2013.
Given that the charges for de-icing are, prima facie, not selective, there is no need to assess whether such charges are justified by the nature or the general scheme of the system.
Komisija je u dopisu od 24. veljače 2014. pozvala Ryanair da podnese primjedbe na primjenu Smjernica za zračni prijevoz iz 2014.
Therefore, the charges for de-icing of aircrafts do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Komisija je 21. ožujka 2014. pozvala Infratel da podnese primjedbe na Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014.
CONCLUSION
Službeni poziv svim zainteresiranim stranama da podnesu primjedbe na Smjernice za zračni prijevoz iz 2014. objavljen je u Službenom listu 15. travnja 2014.
The Commission finds that there is no need to take a decision as to whether potential State aid to FLG constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, and if so, whether such State aid could be declared compatible.
Njemačka je 12. svibnja 2014. poslala svoje primjedbe.
Furthermore, even if there was economic continuity between FLG and Yasmina, it would not be possible to recover the aid from Yasmina anymore as Yasmina has been dissolved and its assets were sold in court supervised insolvency proceedings in line with German insolvency law.
Dodatne primjedbe podnijeli su Air Berlin, Infratil i Schutzgemeinschaft gegen Fluglärm Lübeck und Umgebung eV („SGF”) [13].
The sale of shares in FLG to Infratil in 2005 did not provide an advantage to Infratil, because Hansestadt Lübeck acted like a MEO when selling the shares.
Njemačka je zatražila produljenje roka do 15. srpnja 2011.
The renegotiation of the put option in 2009 and the taking over of further losses, investments and other costs, as laid down in the 2009 Additional Agreement did not provide an advantage to Infratil either.
Komisija je dopisom od 20. travnja 2011. pozvala Njemačku da odgovori na pitanja o pritužbama do 28. travnja 2011.
In that context also Hansestadt Lübeck acted like a MEO.
Njemačka je dopisom od 21. travnja 2011. zatražila dodatno produljenje roka.
The 2000 Agreement between FLG and Ryanair would, from an ex ante point of view, have contributed to the profitability of the airport.
Dopisom od 27. travnja 2011.
Consequently, a MEO would have entered into the agreement which does not provide an advantage to Ryanair.
Komisija je prihvatila produljenje roka do 16. svibnja 2011.
The charges for de-icing of aircrafts at the airport do not appear to be selective,
Njemačka je dostavila informacije 16. svibnja 2011.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Komisija je 20. svibnja 2011. poslala podsjetnik u skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 3.
Article 1
Uredbe (EZ) 659/1999 u kojem je navela da su poslane informacije nepotpune.
It is not necessary to decide whether the potential State aid to FLG constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union and if so, whether it could be declared compatible with the internal market, as the economic activity of FLG has ceased to exist, and as it is not possible anymore to recover the aid.
Rok za dostavu odgovora bio je 7. lipnja 2011.
Article 2
Njemačka je odgovorila dopisom od 7. lipnja 2011., u kojem je tvrdila da dopis od 20. svibnja 2011. nije podsjetnik u smislu Uredbe (EZ) br. 659/1999 jer se činilo da su dva pitanja preoblikovana i, prema njezinu mišljenju, jedno je pitanje bilo novo.
The sale of 90 % of the shares of FLG to Infratil and the conditions of the put option renegotiated in 2009 do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Dopisom od 15. lipnja 2011.
Article 3
Komisija je Njemačkoj poslala drugi podsjetnik u skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 3.
The 2000 Agreement between Ryanair and Lübeck airport does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 659/1999 i dala joj mogućnost da dostavi informacije do 29. lipnja 2011.
Article 4
U slučaju neispunjenja zahtjeva iz podsjetnika Komisija bi razmotrila izdavanje naloga za dostavljanje podataka.
The charges for the de-icing of aircrafts do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Dopisom od 5. srpnja 2011.
Article 5
Komisija je Njemačkoj poslala treći podsjetnik u skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 3.