natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In consequence of this type of agreement any liabilities between the parties would be protected against being separated from each other.
Sanacijskim tijelima trebalo bi dopustiti da o takvoj proširenoj zaštiti odlučuju u pojedinačnim slučajevima sanacije.
This would make the partial transfer with regard to this counterparty unmanageable, and in general would jeopardise the feasibility of the tool altogether, as the resolution authorities might even not be able to discern which liabilities are or are not covered by these arrangements.
Druge ugovorne strane institucije mogu se dogovoriti o takozvanom „sveobuhvatnom” ili „općem” sporazumu o prijeboju koji uključuje sva prava i obveze među stranama.
It should then further be clarified that ‘catch all’ or ‘sweep up’ netting and set-off agreements, including any and all assets, rights and liabilities between the parties, should not qualify as protected arrangements.
Na temelju te vrste sporazuma sve vrste obveza među stranama bile bi zaštićene od međusobnog razdvajanja.
Article 80 of Directive 2014/59/EU implies that any narrowing of the scope of the definitions of protected arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU should not affect the operation of trading, clearing and settlement systems, insofar as these systems fall within the scope of Article 2(a) of the Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Stoga djelomičan prijenos u pogledu te druge ugovorne strane ne bi bio izvediv te bi se općenito ugrozila cjelokupna izvedivost instrumenta jer sanacijska tijela možda ne bi mogla ni razlučiti koje su obveze obuhvaćene, odnosno koje nisu obuhvaćene tim sporazumima.
Resolution authorities should therefore be obliged to protect all types of arrangements referred to in Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU, which are linked to counterparty's activity as a Central Counterparty (CCP).This includes, but does not need to be limited to, the activity covered by a default fund under Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Zato bi trebalo dodatno objasniti da se „sveobuhvatni” ili „opći” sporazumi o netiranju i prijeboju, koji uključuju svu imovinu, prava i obveze među stranama, ne bi smjeli smatrati zaštićenim sporazumima.
The same applies to assets, rights and liabilities relating to payment or securities settlement systems.
Iz članka 80.
As netting arrangements falling in the scope of Directive 98/26/EC are protected in insolvency, they should also be protected, for a reason of consistency, under Article 76 of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Direktive 2014/59/EU proizlazi da suzivanje opsega definicija zaštićenih sporazuma u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2.
However, it is appropriate to extend the scope of the protection under Article 76(2) of that Directive to all arrangements with payment or securities settlement systems and their related activity, where applicable.
Direktive 2014/59/EU ne bi smjelo utjecati na funkcioniranje sustava trgovanja, kliringa i namire ako su ti sustavi obuhvaćeni područjem primjene članka 2. točke (a) Direktive 98/26/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [2].
The need for specifying the scope of the arrangement benefiting from the safeguards in certain cases under Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU should not, in general, prevent resolution authorities from protecting any classes of arrangements which can be subsumed under one of the categories in that Article, and which are protected in insolvency proceedings against a separation of assets, rights and liabilities falling under these agreements under their national insolvency law including the national transposition of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Sanacijska tijela trebala bi stoga biti obvezna zaštititi sve vrste sporazuma iz članka 76. stavka 2.
This is the case, if a creditor would still benefit from the rights arising from the arrangement unless the whole transaction was made void under national insolvency law.
Direktive 2014/59/EU koji su povezani s djelatnošću druge ugovorne strane kao središnje druge ugovorne strane.
This in particular applies to security arrangements and set-off and netting arrangements that are protected under national insolvency law,
To uključuje, ali ne treba biti ograničeno na djelatnost jamstvenog fonda iz članka 42.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3].
Article 1
Isto vrijedi i za imovinu, prava i obveze koji se odnose na platne sustave ili sustave namire vrijednosnih papira.
Definitions
Budući da su sporazumi o netiranju obuhvaćeni područjem primjene Direktive 98/26/EZ zaštićeni u slučaju insolventnosti, zbog dosljednosti bi ih trebalo zaštititi i na temelju članka 76.
For the purpose of this regulation, the definitions contained in Directive 2014/59/EU shall apply.
Direktive 2014/59/EU.
The following definitions shall also apply:
Međutim primjereno je opseg zaštite na temelju članka 76. stavka 2. te Direktive proširiti na sve sporazume s platnim sustavima ili sustavima namire vrijednosnih papira te po potrebi na njihovu povezanu djelatnost.
‘Securitisation’ means securitisation as defined in Article 4(1)(61) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Potreba da se pobliže odredi opseg sporazuma koji u određenim slučajevima podliježe zaštiti na temelju članka 76. stavka 2.
‘Contractual netting agreements’ means contractual netting agreements as defined in Article 295 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Direktive 2014/59/EU u načelu ne bi smjela spriječiti sanacijska tijela da zaštite sve razrede sporazuma koji se mogu uvrstiti u neki od razreda iz tog članka i koji su u postupku u slučaju insolventnosti zaštićeni od odvajanja imovine, prava i obveza koji su obuhvaćeni tim sporazumima u skladu s nacionalnim zakonodavstvom o insolventnosti, uključujući propise kojima je u nacionalno zakonodavstvo prenesena Direktiva 2001/24/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4].
Article 2
To bi bio slučaj kada bi vjerovnik i dalje uživao prava koja proizlaze iz sporazuma osim ako bi se u okviru nacionalnog zakonodavstva o insolventnosti cijela transakcija učinila ništavom.
Conditions relating to security arrangements, including securities financing transactions
To se posebno primjenjuje na sporazume o osiguranju te sporazume o prijeboju i netiranju koji su zaštićeni u okviru nacionalnog zakonodavstva o insolventnosti,
Security arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(a) of Directive 2014/59/EU shall include the following:
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
arrangements stipulating guarantees, personal securities and warranties;
Članak 1.
liens and other real securities interests;
Definicije
securities lending transactions which do not imply a transfer of full ownership of the collateral and which involve one party (the lender) lending securities to the other party (the borrower) for a fee or interest payment and in which the borrower provides the lender with collateral for the duration of the loan.
Za potrebe ove Uredbe primjenjuju se definicije iz Direktive 2014/59/EU.
Security arrangements shall qualify as security arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(a) of Directive 2014/59/EU only if the rights or assets to which the security interest is attached or would attach upon an enforcement event are sufficiently identified or identifiable in accordance with the terms of the arrangement and the applicable national law.
Primjenjuju se i sljedeće definicije:
Article 3
„Sekuritizacija” znači sekuritizacija kako je definirano u članku 4. stavku 1. točki 61.
Conditions relating to set-off arrangements
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [5].
Set-off arrangements entered into between an institution and a single counterparty shall qualify as set-off arrangements referred to in Article 76(2)(c) of Directive 2014/59/EU where they relate to rights and liabilities arising under financial contracts or derivatives.
„Sporazumi o netiranju” znači sporazumi o netiranju kako je definirano u članku 295.
Set-off arrangements entered into between an institution and one or more counterparties shall qualify as set-off arrangements referred to in Article 76(2)(c) of Directive 2014/59/EU in any of the following circumstances:
Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013.
where the arrangements are linked to the counterparty's activity as a central counterparty, in particular for the activity covered by a default fund as referred to Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012;
Članak 2.
where the arrangements are related to rights and obligations towards systems as defined in Article 2(a) of Directive 98/26/EC or other payment or securities settlement systems and are linked to their activity as payment or securities settlement systems.
Uvjeti povezani sa sporazumima o osiguranju, uključujući transakcije financiranja vrijednosnim papirima
Resolution authorities may decide, in individual cases, that set-off arrangements entered into between an institution and one or more counterparties so far as they relate to other types of rights and liabilities than those referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may qualify as set-off arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(c) of Directive 2014/59/EU where the arrangements are recognised for risk mitigation purposes under the applicable prudential rules and the protection, in particular by non-separability, is a condition for that recognition.
Sporazumi o osiguranju u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Direktive 2014/59/EU uključuju sljedeće:
Article 4
sporazume kojima se utvrđuju jamstva, osobna jamstva i garancije;
Conditions relating to netting arrangements
založna prava i druga realna jamstvena prava;
Contractual netting agreements entered into between the institution and a single counterparty shall qualify as netting arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(d) of Directive 2014/59/EU where they relate to rights and liabilities arising under financial contracts or derivatives.
transakcije pozajmljivanja vrijednosnih papira koje ne podrazumijevaju prijenos potpunog vlasništva nad kolateralom i koje uključuju jednu stranu (zajmodavca) koja pozajmljuje vrijednosne papire drugoj strani (zajmoprimcu) u zamjenu za naknadu ili plaćanje kamata i u kojima zajmoprimac zajmodavcu pruža kolateral tijekom trajanja zajma.
Contractual netting agreements entered into between the institution and one or more counterparties shall qualify as netting arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(d) of Directive 2014/59/EU in any of the following circumstances:
Sporazumi o osiguranju smatraju se sporazumima o osiguranju u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Direktive 2014/59/EU samo ako su prava ili imovina s kojima je založno pravo povezano ili s kojima bi bilo povezano u slučaju događaja izvršenja dostatno utvrđeni ili ih je moguće dostatno utvrditi u skladu s uvjetima sporazuma i primjenjivim nacionalnim zakonodavstvom.
Resolution authorities may decide, in individual cases, that netting arrangements entered into between an institution and one or more counterparties may qualify as a netting arrangement pursuant to Article 76(2)(d) of Directive 2014/59/EU where they are recognised for risk mitigation purposes under the applicable prudential rules and the protection, in particular by non-separability, is a condition for that recognition.
Članak 3.
Article 5
Uvjeti koji se odnose na sporazume o prijeboju
General conditions applying to security arrangements, set-off and netting arrangements and structured finance arrangements
Sporazumi o prijeboju sklopljeni između institucije i druge ugovorne strane smatraju se sporazumima o prijeboju iz članka 76. stavka 2. točke (c) Direktive 2014/59/EU ako se odnose na prava i obveze koji proizlaze iz financijskih ugovora ili izvedenica.
Articles 2, 3 and 4 are without prejudice to the following powers of the resolution authorities:
Sporazumi o prijeboju sklopljeni između institucije i druge ugovorne strane ili više njih smatraju se sporazumima o prijeboju iz članka 76. stavka 2. točke (c) Direktive 2014/59/EU u bilo kojoj od sljedećih situacija:
to protect any type of arrangements which can be subsumed under one of the classes in points (a), (c), (d) and (f) of Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU, and which are protected in normal insolvency proceedings against a temporary or indefinite separation, suspension or cancellation of assets, rights and liabilities falling under these arrangements under their national insolvency law including the national transposition of Directive 2001/24/EC,
sporazumi su povezani s djelatnošću druge ugovorne strane kao središnje druge ugovorne strane, prije svega djelatnošću jamstvenog fonda iz članka 42.
to protect any type of arrangements which do not fall within the scope of Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU and which are protected in normal insolvency proceedings against a temporary or indefinite separation, suspension or cancellation of assets, rights and liabilities falling under these arrangements under their national insolvency law including the national transposition of Directive 2001/24/EC.
Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012;
Resolution authorities may, in individual cases, exclude from the protection afforded by Article 76(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU, security arrangements, or set-off and netting arrangements which relate to contracts including any clause which, in the event of default of a counterparty, permits a non-defaulting counterparty to make limited payments only, or no payments at all, to the estate of the defaulting party, even if the defaulting party is a net creditor.
sporazumi se odnose na prava i obveze prema sustavima kako su definirani u članku 2. točki (a) Direktive 98/26/EZ ili prema drugim platnim sustavima ili sustavima namire vrijednosnih papira te su povezani s njihovom djelatnošću kao platnim sustavima ili sustavima namire vrijednosnih papira.
Article 6
Sanacijska tijela mogu u pojedinačnim slučajevima odlučiti da se sporazumi o prijeboju sklopljeni između institucije i druge ugovorne strane ili više njih, ako se odnose na vrste prava i obveza koje nisu navedene u stavcima 1. i 2., smatraju sporazumima o prijeboju u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2. točkom (c) Direktive 2014/59/EU ako se priznaju za potrebe smanjenja rizika u skladu s primjenjivim bonitetnim pravilima te ako je zaštita, prije svega na temelju neodvojivosti, uvjet za to priznavanje.
Conditions relating to structured finance arrangements, including securitisations and instruments used for hedging purposes
Članak 4.
Structured finance arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(f) of Directive 2014/59/EU shall include the following:
Uvjeti koji se odnose na sporazume o netiranju
securitisations in which the underlying exposures have been placed into tranches and transferred by a full title transfer from the balance sheet of the originator, to the institution or entity under resolution (true sale securitisation);
Ugovorni sporazumi o netiranju sklopljeni između institucije i druge ugovorne strane smatraju se sporazumima o netiranju u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2. točkom (d) Direktive 2014/59/EU ako se odnose na prava i obveze koji proizlaze iz financijskih ugovora ili izvedenica.
securitisations by means of contractual instruments, where the underlying assets remain on the balance sheet of the institution or entity under resolution (synthetic securitisation).
Ugovorni sporazumi o netiranju sklopljeni između institucije i druge ugovorne strane ili više njih smatraju se sporazumima o netiranju u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2. točkom (d) Direktive 2014/59/EU u bilo kojoj od sljedećih situacija:
In true sale securitisations, any role of the originator in the structure, including servicing the loans, providing any form of risk protection or providing liquidity, shall be considered as a liability which forms part of the structured finance arrangements.
Sanacijska tijela mogu u pojedinačnim slučajevima odlučiti da se sporazumi o netiranju sklopljeni između institucije i druge ugovorne strane ili više njih mogu smatrati sporazumima o netiranju u skladu s člankom 76. stavkom 2. točkom (d) Direktive 2014/59/EU ako se priznaju za potrebe smanjenja rizika u skladu s primjenjivim bonitetnim pravilima te ako je zaštita, prije svega na temelju neodvojivosti, uvjet za to priznavanje.
In synthetic securitisations, the security interest shall be considered as a right which forms part of the structured finance arrangements only if it is attached to specific and sufficiently identified assets or identifiable in accordance with the terms of the arrangement and the applicable national law.
Članak 5.
Agreements constituting a securitisation structure covering mutual relationships between originators, issuers, trustees, servicers, cash managers and swap and credit protection counterparties, shall be considered as forming part of structured finance arrangements if those mutual relationships are directly linked to the underlying assets and the payments to be made from the proceeds generated by these assets to the holders of the structured instruments.
Opći uvjeti koji se primjenjuju na sporazume o osiguranju, sporazume o prijeboju i sporazume o netiranju te strukturirane financijske sporazume
Those mutual relationships include liabilities and rights related to the underlying assets, liabilities under the instruments issued, and security arrangements, including derivative transactions, required for maintaining the flow of payments under these liabilities.
Člancima 2., 3. i 4. ne dovode se u pitanje sljedeće ovlasti sanacijskih tijela:
Paragraph 2 shall be without prejudice to the power of the resolution authority to decide, on a case-by-case basis and having regard to the specific structure of the structured finance arrangement pursuant to Article 76(2)(f) of Directive 2014/59/EU, that other agreements between the parties referred to in paragraph 2, such as loan servicing agreements, which are not directly linked to the underlying assets and the payments to be made, form part of such structured finance arrangement.
zaštita svih vrsta sporazuma koji se mogu uvrstiti u neki od razreda iz točaka (a), (c), (d) i (f) članka 76. stavka 2.
Article 7
Direktive 2014/59/EU, a koji su u redovnom postupku u slučaju insolventnosti zaštićeni od privremenog ili trajnog odvajanja, suspenzije ili poništenja imovine, prava i obveza obuhvaćenih tim sporazumima u okviru relevantnog nacionalnog zakonodavstva o insolventnosti, uključujući propise o prenošenju Direktive 2001/24/EZ u nacionalno zakonodavstvo;
Entry into force
zaštita svih vrsta sporazuma koji nisu obuhvaćeni člankom 76. stavkom 2.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Direktive 2014/59/EU, a koji su u redovnom postupku u slučaju insolventnosti zaštićeni od privremenog ili trajnog odvajanja, suspenzije ili poništenja imovine, prava i obveza obuhvaćenih tim sporazumima u okviru relevantnog nacionalnog prava u području insolventnosti, uključujući propise o prenošenju Direktive 2001/24/EZ u nacionalno zakonodavstvo.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Iz zaštite utvrđene člankom 76. stavkom 1.
Done at Brussels, 7 February 2017.
Direktive 2014/59/EU sanacijska tijela mogu, u pojedinačnim slučajevima, isključiti sporazume o osiguranju, sporazume o prijeboju ili sporazume o netiranju koji se odnose na ugovore koji sadržavaju bilo koju odredbu kojom se u slučaju nastanka statusa neispunjavanja obveza druge ugovorne strane drugoj ugovornoj strani koja nije u statusu neispunjavanja obveza dopušta da izvrši samo ograničena plaćanja prema ugovornoj strani koja je u statusu neispunjavanja obveza ili da uopće ne izvrši plaćanja, čak i ako je ugovorna strana koja je u statusu neispunjavanja obveza neto vjerovnik.
The President
Uvjeti povezani sa strukturiranim financijskim sporazumima, uključujući sekuritizacije i instrumente koji se rabe za zaštitu od rizika
OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190.
Strukturirani financijski sporazumi iz članka 76. stavka 2. točke (f) Direktive 2014/59/EU uključuju sljedeće:
Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems (OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p. 45).
sekuritizacije u kojima su odnosne izloženosti razvrstane u tranše i uz potpuni prijenos prava vlasništva prenesene iz bilance inicijatora na instituciju ili subjekt u sanaciji (sekuritizacija na temelju „prave prodaje”);
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1).
sekuritizacije na temelju ugovornih instrumenata, u kojima odnosna imovina ostaje u bilanci institucije ili subjekta u sanaciji (sintetske sekuritizacije).
Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions (OJ L 125, 5.5.2001, p. 15).
Pri sekuritizacijama na temelju prave prodaje svaka uloga inicijatora u strukturi, uključujući servisiranje zajmova, pružanje bilo kakvog oblika zaštite od rizika ili pružanje likvidnosti, smatra se obvezom koja čini dio strukturiranih financijskih sporazuma.
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
Pri sintetskim sekuritizacijama založno pravo smatra se pravom koje čini dio strukturiranih financijskih sporazuma samo ako je povezano s određenom imovinom koja je dostatno utvrđena ili koju je moguće dostatno utvrditi u skladu s uvjetima sporazuma i primjenjivim nacionalnim zakonodavstvom.
Done at Brussels, 19 May 2017.
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu na dan objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
On behalf of the President,
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 19. svibnja 2017.
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Indonesia's application to register the name ‘Kopi Arabika Gayo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
U skladu s člankom 50. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, zahtjev Indonezije za upis naziva „Kopi Arabika Gayo” u registar objavljen je u Službenom listu Europske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kopi Arabika Gayo’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Budući da Komisiji nije dostavljen ni jedan prigovor u smislu članka 51.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, naziv „Kopi Arabika Gayo” potrebno je upisati u registar,
The name ‘Kopi Arabika Gayo’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
Članak 1.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.8.
Naziv „Kopi Arabika Gayo” (ZOZP) upisuje se u registar.
Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 [3].Article 2
Naziv iz prvog stavka odnosi se na proizvod iz razreda 1.8.
Done at Brussels, 15 May 2017.
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
OJ C 403, 1.11.2016, p. 5.
Član Komisije
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
SL L 343, 14.12.2012., str. 1.
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of phosphoric acid — phosphates — di — tri — and polyphosphates (E 338-452) in certain meat preparations
o izmjeni Priloga II.
(Text with EEA relevance)
Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu uporabe fosforne kiseline – fosfata – di-, tri- i polifosfata (E 338–452) u određenim mesnim pripravcima
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 lays down a Union list of food additives approved for use in food and their conditions of use.
budući da: