natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [15] should apply to the activities of the Union institutions or bodies when carrying out their tasks as responsible for the operational management of EES.
Za obradu zahtjeva za izdavanje viza u konzularnim predstavništvima također je potrebna analiza dosadašnjih putovanja podnositelja zahtjeva kako bi se ocijenila upotreba prethodnih viza i utvrdilo jesu li poštovani uvjeti boravka.
Personal data obtained by a Member State pursuant to this Regulation should not be transferred or made available to any third country, international organisation or private entity established in or outside the Union.
Napuštanje postupka otiskivanja pečata u putovnice treba nadoknaditi ostvarivanjem uvida u EES.
As an exception to that rule, however, it should be possible to transfer such personal data to a third country or to an international organisation where such a transfer is subject to strict conditions and necessary in individual cases in order to assist with the identification of a third-country national in relation to his or her return.
Stoga bi podaci o dosadašnjim putovanjima koji su dostupni u EES-u trebali obuhvaćati razdoblje koje je dostatno za potrebe izdavanja vize.
In the absence of an adequacy decision by means of implementing act pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or of appropriate safeguards to which transfers are subject pursuant to that Regulation, it should be possible to exceptionally transfer, for the purposes of return, EES data to a third country or to an international organisation, only where it is necessary for important reasons of public interest as referred to in that Regulation.
Pri provođenju analiza rizika na granici i obradi zahtjevâ za izdavanje viza trebalo bi provjeriti podatke o dosadašnjim putovanjima državljana trećih zemalja kako bi se utvrdilo jesu li u prošlosti prekoračili maksimalno trajanje dopuštenog boravka.
It should also be possible to transfer personal data obtained by Member States pursuant to this Regulation to a third country in an exceptional case of urgency, where there is an imminent danger associated with a terrorist offence or where there is an imminent danger to the life of a person associated with a serious criminal offence.
Stoga je potrebno čuvati osobne podatke državljana trećih zemalja koji nisu izašli iz državnog područja država članica unutar dopuštenog razdoblja boravka na dulje razdoblje od pet godina u usporedbi s osobnim podacima državljana trećih zemalja koji su poštovali trajanje dopuštenog boravka i državljana trećih zemalja kojima je ulazak radi kratkotrajnog boravka odbijen.
An imminent danger to the life of a person should be understood as covering a danger arising from a serious criminal offence committed against that person such as grievous bodily injury, illicit trade in human organs and tissue, kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and rape.
Trebalo bi utvrditi pravila koja se odnose na odgovornosti država članica za štetu nastalu zbog bilo kakvog kršenja ove Uredbe.
Such data should only be transferred to a third country if the reciprocal provision of any information on entry/exit records held by the requesting third country to the Member States operating the EES is ensured.
Ne dovodeći u pitanje detaljnija pravila utvrđena ovom Uredbom o obradi osobnih podataka, Uredba (EU) 2016/679 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [14] trebala bi se primjenjivati na obradu osobnih podataka koju države članice obavljaju u okviru primjene ove Uredbe, osim ako takvu obradu obavljaju imenovana tijela ili središnje pristupne točke država članica za potrebe sprečavanja, istrage ili otkrivanja kaznenih djela terorizma ili drugih teških kaznenih djela.
It should be possible for the competent authorities of the Member States whose designated authorities have access to the EES pursuant to this Regulation to transfer the EES data to Member States not operating the EES and to Member States to which this Regulation does not apply.
Ne dovodeći u pitanje detaljnija pravila utvrđena ovom Uredbom o obradi osobnih podataka, nacionalni zakoni i drugi propisi doneseni u skladu s Direktivom (EU) 2016/680 primjenjuju se na obradu osobnih podataka koju obavljaju nadležna tijela država članica za potrebe sprečavanja, istrage ili otkrivanja kaznenih djela terorizma ili drugih teških kaznenih djela u skladu s ovom Uredbom.
Such provision of information should be subject to a duly motivated request, and limited to where it is necessary for the prevention, detection or investigation of a terrorist offence or another serious criminal offence.
Uredba (EZ) br.
It should be possible for a Member State that operates the EES to provide such information only if a reciprocal provision of any information on entry/exit records held by the requesting Member State to the Member States operating the EES is ensured.
45/2001 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [15] trebala bi se primjenjivati na aktivnosti institucija ili tijela Unije pri izvršavanju njihovih zadaća kada su odgovorni za operativno upravljanje EES-om.
Directive (EU) 2016/680 applies to all the subsequent treatment of data obtained from the EES.
Osobni podaci koje država članica pribavi u skladu s ovom Uredbom ne bi se smjeli prenositi ni stavljati na raspolaganje trećoj zemlji, međunarodnoj organizaciji ili privatnom subjektu s poslovnim nastanom u Uniji ili izvan nje.
In each Member State, the supervisory authority established in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States, whilst the European Data Protection Supervisor should monitor the activities of the Union institutions and bodies in relation to the processing of personal data.
Međutim, iznimno od tog pravila, trebalo bi biti moguće prenositi takve osobne podatke trećoj zemlji ili međunarodnoj organizaciji kada takav prijenos podliježe strogim uvjetima i kada je to potrebno u pojedinačnim slučajevima radi lakše identifikacije državljanina treće zemlje povezane s njegovim vraćanjem.
The European Data Protection Supervisor and the supervisory authorities should cooperate with each other in the monitoring of the EES.
U nedostatku odluke o primjerenosti putem provedbenog akta u skladu s Uredbom (EU) 2016/679 ili odgovarajućih zaštitnih mjera kojima prijenosi podliježu u skladu s tom uredbom, podatke iz EES-a trebalo bi biti moguće iznimno prenijeti, u svrhu vraćanja, trećoj zemlji ili međunarodnoj organizaciji samo ako je to potrebno zbog važnih razloga javnog interesa kako je navedeno u toj uredbi.
In each Member State, the supervisory authority established in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/680 should monitor the lawfulness of the processing by the Member States of personal data for law enforcement purposes.
Osobne podatke koje su države članice zaprimile na temelju ove Uredbe također bi trebalo biti moguće prenijeti trećoj zemlji u iznimno hitnom slučaju ako postoji neposredna opasnost povezana s kaznenim djelom terorizma ili ako postoji neposredna opasnost po život osobe povezana s teškim kaznenim djelom.
In addition to the provisions on information to be provided in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, third–country nationals whose data are to be recorded in the EES should be provided with appropriate information in relation to the recording of those data.
Neposrednu opasnost po život osobe trebalo bi tumačiti tako da obuhvaća opasnost koja proizlazi iz teškog kaznenog djela počinjenog protiv osobe, poput teške tjelesne ozljede, nezakonitog trgovanja ljudskim organima i tkivom, otmice, protupravnog oduzimanja slobode i uzimanja talaca, seksualnog iskorištavanja djece i dječje pornografije te silovanja.
This information should be provided by Member States in writing by any appropriate means, including leaflets, posters or any other appropriate electronic means.
Takvi podaci trebali bi se prenijeti u treću zemlju samo ako treća zemlja podnositeljica zahtjeva državama članicama koje upotrebljavaju EES osigura uzajamno pružanje svih informacija o bilješkama o ulasku/izlasku koje posjeduje.
In order to ensure the effective monitoring of the application of this Regulation, this Regulation should be evaluated at regular intervals.
Nadležna tijela država članica čija imenovana tijela imaju pristup EES-u u skladu s ovom Uredbom trebala bi moći prenijeti podatke iz EES-a državama članicama koje ne upotrebljavaju EES i državama članicama na koje se ova Uredba ne primjenjuje.
The Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented.
Takve informacije trebale bi se pružiti na temelju propisno obrazloženog zahtjeva i njihovo pružanje trebalo bi biti ograničeno na slučajeve u kojima je potrebno za sprečavanje, otkrivanje ili istragu kaznenog djela terorizma ili drugog teškog kaznenog djela.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Država članica koja upotrebljava EES takve informacije trebala bi moći pružati samo ako država članica podnositeljica zahtjeva državama članicama koje upotrebljavaju EES osigura uzajamno pružanje svih informacija o bilješkama o ulasku/izlasku koje posjeduje.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [16].
Direktiva (EU) 2016/680 primjenjuje se na sve naknadne obrade podataka dobivenih iz EES-a.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the establishment of the EES and the creation of common obligations, conditions and procedures for use of data cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale and impact of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
U svakoj državi članici nadzorno tijelo osnovano u skladu s Uredbom (EU) 2016/679 trebalo bi pratiti zakonitost obrade osobnih podataka u državama članicama, dok bi Europski nadzornik za zaštitu podataka trebao pratiti aktivnosti institucija i tijela Unije u vezi s obradom osobnih podataka.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Europski nadzornik za zaštitu podataka i nadzorna tijela trebali bi međusobno surađivati u pogledu praćenja EES-a.
Following the start of operations of the EES, the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [17] (‘the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement’) should be amended with regard to bilateral agreements concluded by Member States and the authorised length of stay beyond 90 days in any 180-day period of visa-exempt third–country nationals.
U svakoj državi članici nadzorno tijelo osnovano u skladu s Direktivom (EU) 2016/680 trebalo bi pratiti zakonitost obrade osobnih podataka koju obavljaju države članice za potrebe izvršavanja zakonodavstva.
In its overall evaluation of the EES, the Commission should include an assessment of the use made of the bilateral agreements of Member States.
Uz odredbe o informacijama koje je potrebno pružiti u skladu s Uredbom (EU) 2016/679 državljanima trećih zemalja čiji se podaci bilježe u EES-u trebalo bi pružiti odgovarajuće informacije u vezi s bilježenjem tih podataka.
It should be possible for the Commission to include options in the first evaluation report in view of phasing out such bilateral agreements and replacing them with a Union instrument.
Te bi informacije države članice trebale pružiti u pisanom obliku bilo kojim odgovarajućim sredstvom, među ostalim letcima, plakatima ili bilo kojim drugim odgovarajućim elektroničkim sredstvom.
The projected costs of the EES are lower than the budget earmarked for Smart Borders in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [18].
Radi osiguranja učinkovitog praćenja njezine primjene ovu bi Uredbu trebalo evaluirati u redovitim vremenskim razmacima.
Accordingly, following the adoption of this Regulation, the Commission should, by means of a delegated act provided for in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014, re-allocate the amount currently attributed for developing IT systems supporting the management of migration flows across the external borders.
Države članice trebale bi utvrditi pravila o sankcijama koje se primjenjuju na kršenja odredaba ove Uredbe te osigurati njihovu provedbu.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Directive 2004/38/EC.
Radi osiguranja jedinstvenih uvjeta za provedbu ove Uredbe provedbene ovlasti trebalo bi dodijeliti Komisiji.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Te bi ovlasti trebalo izvršavati u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br.
Given that this Regulation builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Regulation whether it will implement it in its national law.
182/2011 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [16].
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC [19]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
S obzirom na to da ciljeve ove Uredbe, to jest uspostavu EES-a i stvaranje zajedničkih obveza, uvjeta i postupaka u pogledu upotrebe podataka, ne mogu dostatno ostvariti države članice, nego se zbog opsega i učinka djelovanja oni na bolji način mogu ostvariti na razini Unije, Unija može donijeti mjere u skladu s načelom supsidijarnosti utvrđenim u članku 5.
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC [20]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ugovora o Europskoj uniji (UEU).
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [21] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [22].
U skladu s načelom proporcionalnosti utvrđenim u tom članku, ova Uredba ne prelazi ono što je potrebno za ostvarivanje tih ciljeva.
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [23] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [24] and with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/149/JHA [25].
Nakon početka rada EES-a Konvenciju o provedbi Schengenskog sporazuma od 14. lipnja 1985. između vlada država Gospodarske unije Beneluksa, Savezne Republike Njemačke i Francuske Republike o postupnom ukidanju kontrola na zajedničkim granicama [17] („Konvencija o provedbi Schengenskog sporazuma”) trebalo bi izmijeniti u pogledu bilateralnih sporazuma koje su sklopile države članice i dopuštenog trajanja boravka državljana trećih zemalja izuzetih od obveze posjedovanja vize, koji traje dulje od 90 dana u bilo kojem razdoblju od 180 dana.
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [26] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/350/EU [27] and with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/349/EU [28].
U svoju cjelovitu evaluaciju EES-a Komisija bi trebala uključiti procjenu upotrebe na temelju bilateralnih sporazuma država članica.
As regards Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia, the provisions of this Regulation relating to the SIS and the VIS constitute provisions building upon, or otherwise relating to, the Schengen acquis within, respectively, the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession, Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession and Article 4(2) of the 2011 Act of Accession read in conjunction with Council Decisions 2010/365/EU [29], (EU) 2017/733 [30] and (EU) 2017/1908 [31].
Komisija bi u prvo evaluacijsko izvješće trebala moći uključiti opcije u pogledu postupnog ukidanja takvih bilateralnih sporazuma i njihove zamjene instrumentom Unije.
In addition, the operation of the EES requires the granting of passive access to the VIS and the putting into effect of all the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS in accordance with the relevant Council Decisions.
Predviđeni troškovi EES-a manji su od iznosa proračuna namijenjenog za pametne granice u Uredbi (EU) 515/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [18].
Those conditions can only be met once the verification in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedure has been successfully completed.
Slijedom navedenog, nakon donošenja ove Uredbe Komisija bi putem delegiranog akta predviđenog u Uredbi (EU) br.
Therefore, the EES should be operated only by those Member States which fulfil those conditions by the start of operations of the EES.
515/2014 trebala preraspodijeliti iznos koji je trenutačno namijenjen za razvoj sustava informacijske tehnologije kojima se podupire upravljanje migracijskim tokovima preko vanjskih granica.
Member States not operating the EES from the initial start of operations should be connected to the EES in accordance with the procedure set out in this Regulation as soon as all of those conditions are met.
Ovom se Uredbom ne dovodi u pitanje primjena Direktive 2004/38/EZ.
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and delivered an opinion on 21 September 2016.
U skladu s člancima 1. i 2.
This Regulation establishes strict rules concerning access to the EES, as well as the necessary safeguards for such access.
Protokola br.
It also sets out the individuals’ rights of access, rectification, completion, erasure and redress, in particular the right to a judicial remedy and the supervision of processing operations by public independent authorities.
22 o stajalištu Danske, priloženog UEU-u i Ugovoru o funkcioniranju Europske unije, Danska ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Uredbe te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje.
This Regulation therefore respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular the right to human dignity, the prohibition of slavery and forced labour, the right to liberty and security, respect for private and family life, the protection of personal data, the right to non-discrimination, the rights of the child, the rights of the elderly, the integration of persons with disabilities and the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial.
S obzirom na to da ova Uredba predstavlja daljnji razvoj schengenske pravne stečevine, Danska, u skladu s člankom 4. navedenog protokola, u roku od šest mjeseci nakon što Vijeće odluči o ovoj Uredbi odlučuje hoće li je provesti u svojem nacionalnom pravu.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the obligations deriving from the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967,
Ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u kojoj Ujedinjena Kraljevina ne sudjeluje, u skladu s Odlukom Vijeća 2000/365/EZ [19]; Ujedinjena Kraljevina stoga ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Uredbe te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u kojoj Irska ne sudjeluje, u skladu s Odlukom Vijeća 2002/192/EZ [20]; Irska stoga ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Uredbe i ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje.
CHAPTER I
U pogledu Islanda i Norveške ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u smislu Sporazuma između Vijeća Europske unije i Republike Islanda i Kraljevine Norveške o pridruživanju tih država provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine [21], koje pripadaju području iz članka 1. točke A Odluke Vijeća 1999/437/EZ [22].
GENERAL PROVISIONS
U pogledu Švicarske ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u smislu Sporazuma između Europske unije, Europske zajednice i Švicarske Konfederacije o pridruživanju Švicarske Konfederacije provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine [23], koje pripadaju području iz članka 1. točke A Odluke 1999/437/EZ u vezi s člankom 3.
Article 1
Odluke Vijeća 2008/146/EZ [24] i člankom 3.
Subject matter
Odluke Vijeća 2008/149/PUP [25].
This Regulation establishes an ‘Entry/Exit System’ (EES) for:
U pogledu Lihtenštajna ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u smislu Protokola između Europske unije, Europske zajednice, Švicarske Konfederacije i Kneževine Lihtenštajna o pristupanju Kneževine Lihtenštajna Sporazumu između Europske unije, Europske zajednice i Švicarske Konfederacije o pridruživanju Švicarske Konfederacije provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine [26], koje pripadaju području iz članka 1. točke A Odluke 1999/437/EZ u vezi s člankom 3.
the recording and storage of the date, time and place of entry and exit of third–country nationals crossing the borders of the Member States at which the EES is operated;
Odluke Vijeća 2011/350/EU [27] i člankom 3.
the calculation of the duration of the authorised stay of such third-country nationals;
Odluke Vijeća 2011/349/EU [28].
the generation of alerts to Member States when the authorised stay has expired; and
U pogledu Cipra, Bugarske, Rumunjske i Hrvatske, odredbe ove Uredbe koje se odnose na SIS i VIS predstavljaju odredbe koje se temelje na schengenskoj pravnoj stečevini ili su na drugi način s njom povezane u smislu članka 3. stavka 2.
the recording and storage of the date, time and place of refusal of entry of third-country nationals whose entry for a short stay has been refused, as well as the authority of the Member State which refused the entry and the reasons therefor.
Akta o pristupanju iz 2003., članka 4. stavka 2.
For the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences, this Regulation also lays down the conditions under which Member States’ designated authorities and Europol may obtain access to the EES for consultation.
Akta o pristupanju iz 2005. odnosno članka 4. stavka 2.
Article 2
Akta o pristupanju iz 2011., u vezi s odlukama Vijeća 2010/365/EU [29], (EU) 2017/733 [30] i (EU) 2017/1908 [31].