natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As that data were evaluated by the United Kingdom as part of the procedure to amend the conditions of approval of the active substance penflufen the requirement is considered as fulfilled.
Agencija je 3. studenoga 2016.
The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Komisiji dostavila zaključak o tome može li se očekivati da nove uporabe aktivne tvari penflufen ispunjavaju mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Uredbe (EZ) br.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
1107/2009.
Article 1
Komisija je 23. siječnja 2017.
Amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
Stalnom odboru za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje predstavila nacrt dopune izvješću o pregledu za penflufen i nacrt uredbe.
The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Podnositelj zahtjeva pozvan je da dostavi primjedbe na dopunu izvješća o pregledu.
Article 2
Za jednu ili više reprezentativnih uporaba najmanje jednog sredstva za zaštitu bilja koje sadržava predmetnu aktivnu tvar, ako se to sredstvo za zaštitu bilja upotrebljava za tretiranje sjemena ili drugog reprodukcijskog sadnog materijala koji se sije ili sadi, utvrđeno je da su mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4.
Entry into force
Uredbe (EZ) br.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Stoga je primjereno ukloniti ograničenje uporabe penflufena isključivo na gomolj sjemenskog krumpira te dopustiti da se upotrebljava i na drugim vrstama sjemena ili na drugom reprodukcijskom sadnom materijalu.
Done at Brussels, 7 February 2018.
U skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 2.
For the Commission
Uredbe (EZ) br.
The President
1107/2009 u vezi s njezinim člankom 6. te s obzirom na postojeća znanstvena i tehnička saznanja, potrebno je i primjereno izmijeniti uvjete za odobrenje, uz zadržavanje određenih uvjeta i ograničenja, te od podnositelja zahtjeva zatražiti da dostavi dodatne potvrdne informacije iz prvog odobrenja.
OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p.
U skladu s Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br.
1.
1031/2013 podnositelj zahtjeva u roku od dvije godine od stupanja na snagu te uredbe mora dostaviti potvrdne informacije o dugoročnom riziku za ptice.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1031/2013 of 24 October 2013 approving the active substance penflufen, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ L 283, 25.10.2013, p.
Budući da je podnositelj zahtjeva te podatke dostavio u dokumentaciji podnesenoj uz zahtjev za izmjenu uvjeta odobrenja aktivne tvari penflufen, smatra se da je ispunio tu obvezu.
17).
Države članice trebale bi na temelju tih novih informacija prema potrebi provjeriti nacionalna odobrenja za proizvode koji sadržavaju penflufen.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p.
U skladu s Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br.
1).
1031/2013 Komisiji se moraju dostaviti i informacije o specifikaciji tehničkog materijala proizvedenog za tržište.
EFSA Journal 2016;14(11):4604.
Budući da je Ujedinjena Kraljevina ocijenila te podatke u okviru postupka za izmjenu uvjeta za odobrenje aktivne tvari penflufen, smatra se da je ta obveza ispunjena.
Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu
Prilog Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) br.
ANNEX
540/2011 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
The column ‘Specific provisions’ of row 55, penflufen, of Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is replaced by the following:
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Stalnog odbora za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje,
‘PART A
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
Only uses to treat seeds or other propagating materials before or during sowing or planting, may be authorised, limited to one application every third year on the same field.
Članak 1.
PART B
Izmjena Provedbene uredbe (EU) br.
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on penflufen, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 15 March 2013 and of the addendum to the review report on penflufen, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed on 13 December 2017 shall be taken into account.
540/2011
In this overall assessment Member States shall pay particular attention to:
Prilog Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) br.
the protection of operators;
540/2011 mijenja se u skladu s Prilogom ovoj Uredbi.
the long-term risk to birds;
Članak 2.
the protection of groundwater, when the substance is applied to regions with vulnerable soil and/or climatic conditions;
Stupanje na snagu
to the residues in surface water abducted for drinking water purposes, in or from areas where products containing penflufen are used.
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
On 10 August 2017 the European Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of certain corrosion resistant steels (‘CRS’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’) by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1444 (‘the provisional Regulation’) under Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (‘the basic Regulation’).
Privremene mjere
The investigation was initiated on 9 December 2016 following a complaint lodged on 25 October 2016 by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 53 % of the total Union production of certain corrosion resistant steels.
Europska komisija (dalje u tekstu „Komisija”) Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2017/1444 („Privremena uredba”) 10. kolovoza 2017. uvela je privremenu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz u Uniju određenih čelikâ otpornih na koroziju podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK” ili „predmetna zemlja”) na temelju članka 7.
As stated in recital 30 of the provisional Regulation the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2016 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 („Osnovna uredba”).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Ispitni postupak pokrenut je 9. prosinca 2016. nakon što je Europska federacija proizvođača željeza i čelika („Eurofer” ili „podnositelj pritužbe”) 25. listopada 2016. podnijela pritužbu u ime proizvođača koji čine više od 53 % ukupne proizvodnje određenih čelikâ otpornih na koroziju u Uniji.
Registration
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 30.
The Commission made imports of the product concerned originating in and consigned from the PRC subject to registration by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1238.
Privremene uredbe, ispitnim postupkom o dampingu i šteti obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. listopada 2015. do 30. rujna 2016. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka” ili „RIP”).
The registration of imports ceased with the imposition of provisional measures on 11 August 2017.
Ispitivanjem kretanja relevantnih za procjenu štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2013. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka („razmatrano razdoblje”).
Subsequent procedure
Evidentiranje
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (‘the provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Komisija je Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2017/1238 uvoz predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom i poslanog iz NRK-a uvjetovala evidentiranjem.
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Evidentiranje uvoza prestalo je uvođenjem privremenih mjera 11. kolovoza 2017.
During the definitive stage of the investigation, hearings took place with the International Steel Trade Association (‘ISTA’) on 13 November 2017 and the Chinese Iron and Steel Association (‘CISA’) on 17 November 2017.
Daljnji postupak
The Commission continued seeking and verifying all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Nakon objave bitnih činjenica i razmatranja na temelju kojih je uvedena privremena antidampinška pristojba („privremena objava”) nekoliko zainteresiranih strana dostavilo je pisane podneske u kojima su iznijele svoje stavove o privremenim nalazima.
In order to have at its disposal information regarding the registration of imports, the sampled Union producers, Eurofer and all known importers were requested to provide additional data.
Stranama koje su to zatražile omogućeno je da budu saslušane.
The sampled Union producers, Eurofer and six importers submitted questionnaire replies.
Tijekom konačne faze ispitnog postupka 13. studenoga 2017. održano je saslušanje s Međunarodnim udruženjem trgovaca čelikom („ISTA”) i 17. studenoga 2017. s kineskim Udruženjem proizvođača željeza i čelika („CISA”).
In order to verify the questionnaires replies mentioned in recital 7 above, on-spot verification visits were carried out of the data submitted by:
Komisija je nastavila prikupljati i provjeravati sve informacije koje je smatrala potrebnima za svoje konačne nalaze.
Eurofer, Brussels, Belgium,
Kako bi imala na raspolaganju informacije o evidentiranju uvoza, od proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku, Eurofera i svih uvoznika koji su joj poznati zatražila je da dostave dodatne podatke.
Vergalle NV, Oudenaarde, Belgium.
Proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku, Eurofer i šest uvoznika dostavili su odgovore na upitnik.
As announced in recital 22 of the provisional Regulation, at definitive stage verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following traders/importers related to sampled exporting producers in the PRC:
Kako bi provjerila odgovore na upitnike navedene u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 7., obavljeni su posjeti radi provjere na licu mjesta podataka koje su dostavili:
Hebei Iron and Steel Group (‘HBIS’):
Eurofer, Bruxelles, Belgija
Duferco Deutschland GmbH, Ratingen, Germany,
Vergalle NV, Oudenaarde, Belgija
Duferco SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Kako je najavljeno u uvodnoj izjavi 22.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of corrosion resistant steels originating in the PRC and definitively collect the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (‘the definitive disclosure’).
Privremene uredbe, u konačnoj fazi posjeti radi provjere obavljeni su u poslovnim prostorima sljedećih trgovaca/uvoznika povezanih s proizvođačima izvoznicima u uzorku iz NRK-a:
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure.
Grupa Hebei Iron and Steel („HBIS”):
Following definitive disclosure, one party requested and received additional company-specific explanations.
Duferco Deutschland GmbH, Ratingen, Njemačka
The Commission received no comments on these additional explanations.
Duferco SA, Lugano, Švicarska
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Komisija je sve strane obavijestila o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih je namjeravala uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz u Uniju čelikâ otpornih na koroziju podrijetlom iz NRK-a i konačno naplatiti iznose osigurane privremenom pristojbom („konačna objava”).
Individual treatment
Svim je stranama odobreno razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle podnijeti primjedbe na konačnu objavu.
In Recital 21 of the provisional Regulation the Commission noted that three groups of exporting producers in the PRC requested individual treatment under Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Nakon konačne objave jedna strana zatražila je i dobila dodatna objašnjenja koja se odnose na točno određeno društvo.
Recital 22 of the provisional Regulation explained the reasons why the examination of such requests was not possible at the provisional stage.
Komisija nije primila primjedbe na ta dodatna objašnjenja.
Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping measures, the group of companies referred to in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation claimed that its request for individual treatment should be examined at the definitive stage (i) on the grounds that it was the only Chinese exporting producer supplying certain products into the Union market; (ii) because of the peculiarities of its products which is a reiteration, without new elements in support, of a previous claim readdressed in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation; and (iii) because WTO law lays down the obligation to determine individual dumping margins for each known producer (unless a restricted number of exceptions occur).
Primjedbe koje su dostavile zainteresirane strane razmotrene su i uzete u obzir kad je to bilo primjereno.
The party also claimed that overall the number of exporters could not be considered to be ‘so large’ as to make the determination of individual margins impracticable.
Individualni tretman
With regard to the first two claims, it is confirmed that the product range already covered in the sample is considered representative as the sample is considered representative accounting for almost half of the total Chinese imports to the Union.
U uvodnoj izjavi 21.
With regard to the third claim, the Commission confirms the conclusion reached at the provisional stage that the number of requests for individual treatment (by three groups of exporting producers in the PRC, composed of several individual undertakings) was so large as to make individual examinations unduly burdensome and prevent the completion of the investigation in good time.
Privremene uredbe Komisija je napomenula da su tri grupe proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u zatražile individualni tretman na temelju članka 17. stavka 3.
Indeed, after an assessment of the workload expected to be generated by the requests, the Commission decided that no individual treatment could be granted at definitive stage as the number of entities to be additionally investigated and the number of different locations to be visited for the verification would have been unduly burdensome and prevented completion of the investigation in good time in view of the timeline of the investigation and the resources available on the Commission's side.
Osnovne uredbe.
The Commission already investigated 22 entities in seven locations as part of the sample.
U uvodnoj izjavi 22.
Moreover, as noted in recital 9 above, important verifications which are normally performed at the provisional stage of an investigation, had already to be postponed to the definitive stage of the investigation given the size of the case and the number of interested parties to be investigated in this case, thus putting an additional burden on the investigation.
Privremene uredbe objašnjeni su razlozi zbog kojih se ti zahtjevi nisu mogli ispitati u privremenoj fazi.
It is also recalled that the sample of the exporting producers accounts for almost half of the total Chinese import volumes of the product concerned to the Union during the investigation period.
Nakon uvođenja privremenih antidampinških mjera grupa društava iz uvodne izjave 23.
The groups requesting individual treatment would account altogether for less than 5 % of the total imports.
Privremene uredbe tvrdila je da njezin zahtjev za individualni tretman treba ispitati u konačnoj fazi i. jer je ona jedini kineski proizvođač izvoznik koji na tržište Unije dostavlja određene proizvode, ii. zbog specifičnosti njezinih proizvoda, čime je ponovila prethodnu tvrdnju koja je ponovno razmatrana u uvodnoj izjavi 23.
Finally, the Commission also refers to the principle of non-discrimination that could be breached if only one additional group is individually examined and not the other two companies/groups outside the sample who also requested individual examination.
Privremene uredbe, a da pritom nije dostavila nove elemente u potporu tome i iii. jer je u pravu WTO-a utvrđena obveza određivanja pojedinačnih dampinških marži za svakog poznatog proizvođača (osim u slučaju pojave ograničenog broja izuzeća).
Following definitive disclosure, the group of companies referred in recital 13 above reiterated its request for individual examination on the grounds that (i) it is a non-integrated producer of the product concerned with different cost structure and profit composition from the exporting producers in the sample; (ii) the Commission, allegedly, did not intend to give an earlier decision on the individual examination in order to deprive interested parties of the opportunity to provide comments on the issue; (iii) according to WTO law, refusal of requests for individual examination should be an exception; (iv) the Commission had verified all sampled exporting producers before April 2017 and (v) the principle of non-discrimination is not an issue since, according to case law, the Commission should have assessed the MET claims from the other two companies/groups outside the sample who also requested individual examination.
Ta je strana tvrdila i da se ukupan broj izvoznika ne može smatrati „toliko velikim” da bi određivanje pojedinačnih marži bilo nepraktično.
None of the grounds laid down above undermines the overall conclusion that the examination of individual examination requests was not possible.
U pogledu prvih dviju tvrdnji potvrđuje se da se asortiman proizvoda koji je već obuhvaćen u uzorku smatra reprezentativnim jer se uzorak smatra reprezentativnim ako čini gotovo polovinu ukupnog kineskog uvoza u Uniju.
Firstly, the alleged difference in cost structure and profit composition cannot on its own justify a request for individual examination.
U pogledu treće tvrdnje Komisija potvrđuje zaključak donesen u privremenoj fazi da je broj zahtjeva za individualni tretman (koje su dostavile tri grupe proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u koje se sastoje od nekoliko pojedinačnih poduzetnika) bio toliko velik da bi pojedinačna ispitivanja bila neopravdano opterećenje te da bi se time spriječio pravovremeni dovršetak ispitnog postupka.
Rather, all companies having requested an individual examination are in the same factual and legal situation.
Naime, nakon procjene očekivanog radnog opterećenja koje bi nastalo zbog tih zahtjeva Komisija je odlučila da se u konačnoj fazi ne može odobriti individualni tretman jer bi broj subjekata koje je potrebno dodatno ispitati i broj različitih lokacija koje je potrebno posjetiti radi provjere bili neopravdano opterećenje te bi se time spriječio pravovremeni dovršetak ispitnog postupka s obzirom na vremenski okvir ispitnog postupka i resurse koji su Komisiji na raspolaganju.
In addition, the company always can ask for a refund or an interim review, if the applicable conditions are met.
Komisija je u okviru uzorka već ispitala 22 subjekta na sedam lokacija.
Secondly, the Commission never prevented interested parties from providing comments on the issue.
Nadalje, kako se napominje u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 9., važne provjere koje se uobičajeno obavljaju u privremenoj fazi ispitnog postupka već su se morale odgoditi za konačnu fazu ispitnog postupka s obzirom na veličinu predmeta i broj zainteresiranih strana koje je u ovom slučaju potrebno ispitati, čime je na ispitni postupak stavljeno dodatno opterećenje.
Thirdly, the Commission recalls that WTO law clearly states, in Article 6.10 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, that in cases where the number of [exporters] involved is so large as to make [individual examination] impracticable the authorities may limit their examination to a reasonable number of interested parties by using samples.
Podsjeća se i da uzorak proizvođača izvoznika čini gotovo polovinu ukupnog obujma kineskog uvoza predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
Applying this rule does not discourage voluntary replies.
Grupe koje su zatražile individualni tretman zajedno bi činile manje od 5 % ukupnog uvoza.
Fourthly, the Commission completed the verification of the sampled groups only in October 2017.
Konačno, Komisija upućuje i na načelo nediskriminacije koje bi se moglo prekršiti ako se pojedinačno ispita samo jedna dodatna grupa, ali ne i druga dva društva/druge dvije grupe izvan uzorka koje su isto tako zatražile pojedinačno ispitivanje.
Lastly, the Commission notes that the burden of carrying out the analyses of requests from three additional companies/groups was developed ad abundum in the provisional Regulation and the recitals 15 to 17 above.
Nakon konačne objave grupa društava iz prethodne uvodne izjave 13. ponovila je svoj zahtjev za pojedinačno ispitivanje i. jer je neintegrirani proizvođač predmetnog proizvoda s drukčijom strukturom troškova i dobiti od proizvođača izvoznikâ u uzorku; ii. jer Komisija, navodno, nije namjeravala donijeti raniju odluku o pojedinačnom ispitivanju kako bi zainteresirane strane lišila mogućnosti da dostave primjedbe o tom pitanju; iii. jer bi u skladu s pravom WTO-a odbijanje zahtjevâ za pojedinačno ispitivanje trebalo biti iznimka; iv. jer je Komisija provjerila sve proizvođače izvoznike u uzorku prije travnja 2017. i v. jer načelo nediskriminacije nije upitno s obzirom na to da je, u skladu sa sudskom praksom, Komisija trebala ocijeniti zahtjeve za primjenu tretmana tržišnoga gospodarstva drugih dvaju društava/drugih dviju grupa izvan uzorka koje su isto tako zatražile pojedinačno ispitivanje.
In the absence of any further comments concerning individual examination, the provisional findings set out in recitals 21 to 24 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Nijednim se prethodno utvrđenim razlogom ne dovodi u pitanje ukupan zaključak da ispitivanje zahtjeva za pojedinačno ispitivanje nije bilo moguće.
Market economy treatment (‘MET’)
Prvo, navodnom razlikom u strukturi troškova i dobiti samom po sebi ne može se opravdati zahtjev za pojedinačno ispitivanje.
Recital 25 of the provisional Regulation noted that two groups of non-sampled cooperating producers in the PRC had submitted MET claim forms within their request for individual treatment.
Naprotiv, sva društva koja su zatražila pojedinačno ispitivanje nalaze se u istoj činjeničnoj i pravnoj situaciji.
As the Commission decided not to grant individual treatment to these groups, their MET claims were not assessed.
Uz to, društvo uvijek može zatražiti povrat ili privremenu reviziju ako su ispunjeni primjenjivi uvjeti.
In the absence of any comments concerning MET, the provisional findings set out in recital 25 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Drugo, Komisija zainteresirane strane nikad nije spriječila da dostave primjedbe o tom pitanju.
Product concerned and like product
Treće, Komisija podsjeća da je u pravu WTO-a, članku 6. stavku 10.
Recital 31 of the provisional Regulation set out the definition of the product concerned.
Sporazuma o antidampingu, jasno navedeno da, ako je broj uključenih [izvoznika] toliko velik da je [pojedinačno ispitivanje] nepraktično, nadležna tijela njihovo ispitivanje mogu ograničiti na razuman broj primjenom uzoraka.
This definition is definitively confirmed.
Primjenom tog pravila ne odvraća se strane da dobrovoljno dostave odgovore.
As mentioned at recital 34 of the provisional Regulation certain parties continued to request clarification on the definition of the product concerned.
Četvrto, Komisija je provjeru grupa u uzorku dovršila tek u listopadu 2017.