natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5-(2-aminopropyl)indole, as referred to in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1876 [9].
Uredba (EZ) br.
henyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP), as referred to in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1070 [10].
1920/2006 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 12. prosinca 2006. o Europskom centru za praćenje droga i ovisnosti o drogama (SL L 376, 27.12.2006., str. 1.).”.
Methyl 2-[[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-CHMICA), as referred to in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/369 [11].
SL L 123, 12.5.2016., str. 1.”.
N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylacrylamide (acryloylfentanyl), as referred to in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1774 [12].
PRILOG
Council Decision 1999/615/JHA of 13 September 1999 defining 4-MTA as a new synthetic drug which is to be made subject to control measures and criminal penalties (OJ L 244, 16.9.1999, p. 1).
Popis tvari iz članka 1. točke 1. podtočke (b)
Council Decision 2002/188/JHA of 28 February 2002 concerning control measures and criminal sanctions in respect of the new synthetic drug PMMA (OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 14).
P-Metiltioamfetamin ili 4-Metiltioamfetamin, kako je navedeno u Odluci Vijeća 1999/615/PUP [1].
Council Decision 2003/847/JHA of 27 November 2003 concerning control measures and criminal sanctions in respect of the new synthetic drugs 2C-I, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7 and TMA-2 (OJ L 321, 6.12.2003, p. 64).
Parametoksimetilamfetamin ili N-metil-1-(4-metoksifenil)-2-aminopropan, kako je navedeno u Odluci Vijeća 2002/188/PUP [2].
Council Decision 2008/206/JHA of 3 March 2008 on defining 1-benzylpiperazine (BZP) as a new psychoactive substance which is to be made subject to control measures and criminal provisions (OJ L 63, 7.3.2008, p. 45).
2,5-dimetoksi-4-iodofenetilamin, 2,5-dimetoksi-4-etiltiofenetilamin, 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(n)-propiltiofenetilamin i 2,4,5-trimetoksiamfetamin, kako je navedeno u Odluci Vijeća 2003/847/PUP [3].
Council Decision 2010/759/EU of 2 December 2010 on submitting 4-methylmethcathinone (mephedrone) to control measures (OJ L 322, 8.12.2010, p. 44).
enzilpiperazin ili 1-benzil-1,4-diazacikloheksan ili N-benzilpiperazin ili benzilpiperazin, kako je navedeno u Odluci Vijeća 2008/206/PUP [4].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1873 of 8 October 2015 on subjecting 4-methyl-5-(4-methylphenyl)-4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-amine (4,4′-DMAR) and 1-cyclohexyl-4-(1,2-diphenylethyl)piperazine (MT-45) to control measures (OJ L 275, 20.10.2015, p. 32).
etilmetkatinon, kako je navedeno u Odluci Vijeća 2010/759/EU [5].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1874 of 8 October 2015 on subjecting 4-methylamphetamine to control measures (OJ L 275, 20.10.2015, p. 35).
etil-5-(4-metilfenil)-4,5-dihidrooksazol-2-amin (4,4′-DMAR) i 1-cikloheksil-4-(1,2-difeniletil)piperazin (MT-45), kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2015/1873 [6].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1875 of 8 October 2015 on subjecting 4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxy-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)phenethylamine (25I-NBOMe), 3,4-dichloro-N-[[1-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]methyl]benzamide (AH-7921), 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) and 2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(ethylamino)cyclohexanone (methoxetamine) to control measures (OJ L 275, 20.10.2015, p. 38).
etilamfetamin, kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2015/1874 [7].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1876 of 8 October 2015 on subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures (OJ L 275, 20.10.2015, p. 43).
odo-2,5-dimetoksi-N-(2-metoksibenzil)fenetilamin (25I-NBOMe), 3,4-dikloro-N-[[1-(dimetilamino)cikloheksil]metil]benzamid (AH-7921), 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron (MDPV) i 2-(3-metoksifenil)-2-(etilamino)cikloheksanon (metoksetamin), kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2015/1875 [8].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1070 of 27 June 2016 on subjecting 1-phenyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP) to control measures (OJ L 178, 2.7.2016, p. 18).
5-(2-aminopropil)indol, kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2015/1876 [9].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/369 of 27 February 2017 on subjecting methyl 2-[[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-CHMICA) to control measures (OJ L 56, 3.3.2017, p. 210).
enil-2-(pirolidin-1-il)pentan-1-on (α-pirolidinovalorofenon, α-PVP), kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2016/1070 [10].
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1774 of 25 September 2017 on subjecting N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylacrylamide (acryloylfentanyl) to control measures (OJ L 251, 29.9.2017, p.
metil 2-[[1-(cikloheksilmetil)-1H-indol-3-karbonil]amino]-3,3-dimetilbutanoat (MDMB-CHMICA), kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2017/369 [11].
21).
N-(1-fenilpiperidin-4-il)-N-fenilakrilamid (akriloilfentanil), kako je navedeno u Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2017/XXX [12].
Directive (EU) 2017/2108 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2017/2108 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 100. stavak 2.,
Such excursions should be undertaken by ships that meet the requirements for passenger ships of the coastal State, as stated, inter alia, by the IMO guidelines (MSC.1/Circ.
Za te bi izlete trebalo upotrebljavati brodove koji ispunjavaju zahtjeve obalne države o putničkim brodovima, kao što je, među ostalim, navedeno u smjernicama IMO-a (MSC.1/Circ.
1417 on Guidelines for passenger ship tenders).
1417 o smjernicama za tendere putničkih brodova).
The definition of pleasure yacht and craft should be better aligned with the 1974 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1974 SOLAS Convention).
Definiciju jahte za razonodu i plovila za razonodu trebalo bi bolje uskladiti s Međunarodnom konvencijom o zaštiti ljudskog života na moru iz 1974.
In view of the principle of proportionality, the current prescriptive requirements derived from the 1974 SOLAS Convention have proven difficult to adapt to small passenger vessels below 24 metres in length.
(Konvencija SOLAS 1974.).
Furthermore, small ships are primarily built in materials other than steel.
S obzirom na načelo proporcionalnosti pokazalo se da je trenutačne preskriptivne zahtjeve koji proizlaze iz Konvencije SOLAS 1974. teško prilagoditi malim putničkim plovilima duljine manje od 24 metra.
Therefore only a very limited number of such ships have been certified under Directive 2009/45/EC.
Nadalje, mali brodovi uglavnom su izgrađeni od materijala koji nisu čelik.
In the absence of specific safety concerns and adequate standards provided by Directive 2009/45/EC, ships below 24 metres in length should therefore be excluded from the scope of that Directive and should be subject to specific safety standards determined by Member States, which are better placed to assess the local limitations on navigation for those ships in terms of distance to coast or port and weather conditions.
Stoga je vrlo ograničen broj takvih brodova odobren u skladu s Direktivom 2009/45/EZ.
In determining those standards, Member States should take into account guidelines to be published by the Commission.
U nedostatku posebnih sigurnosnih problema i odgovarajućih normi predviđenih Direktivom 2009/45/EZ, brodove duljine manje od 24 metra trebalo bi stoga isključiti iz područja primjene te direktive te bi se na njih trebale primjenjivati posebne sigurnosne norme koje odrede države članice, koje mogu bolje procijeniti lokalna ograničenja plovidbe tih brodova u pogledu udaljenosti od obale ili luke i vremenskih uvjeta.
Those guidelines should take into consideration any international agreements and conventions by the IMO, as appropriate, and should avoid introducing additional requirements that go beyond existing international rules.
Države članice bi pri utvrđivanju tih normi trebale uzeti u obzir smjernice koje treba objaviti Komisija.
The Commission is invited to adopt such guidelines as soon as possible.
U tim smjernicama trebali bi se prema potrebi uzeti u obzir drugi međunarodni sporazumi i konvencije IMO-a te bi trebalo izbjegavati uvođenje dodatnih zahtjeva koji izlaze iz okvira postojećih međunarodnih pravila.
To further simplify the definitions of sea areas provided for by Directive 2009/45/EC and to minimise the burden on Member States, redundant or inadequate criteria should be removed.
Komisija se poziva da u najkraćem mogućem roku donese takve smjernice.
While maintaining the safety level, the definition of sea areas in which ships of Class C and D may operate should be simplified by removing the criterion of ‘where the shipwrecked persons can land’ and by removing the ‘distance to the place of refuge’ for the purpose of defining the sea areas.
Kako bi se dodatno pojednostavnile definicije morskih područja predviđene Direktivom 2009/45/EZ i što više smanjilo opterećenje za države članice, trebalo bi ukloniti suvišne ili neprimjerene kriterije.
The appropriateness of a particular coastline as a place of refuge is a dynamic parameter that can only be assessed on a case by case basis by Member States.
U svrhu definiranja morskih područja definiciju morskih područja u kojima mogu ploviti brodovi klase C i D trebalo bi pojednostavniti uklanjanjem kriterija „na koje se mogu iskrcati brodolomci” i „udaljenost od mjesta zakloništa”, uz održavanje iste razine sigurnosti.
Where necessary, any operational restrictions for a particular ship related to its distance from a place of refuge should be noted in the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate.
Primjerenost određene obale kao mjesta zakloništa dinamičan je parametar koji države članice mogu procijeniti samo za svaki slučaj posebno.
Due to the specific geographical and weather characteristics and the high number of islands that need to be served regularly and frequently in Greece, both with the mainland or amongst them, and the ensuing high number of possible maritime connections, Greece should be allowed to derogate from the requirement of establishing sea areas.
Ako je potrebno, sva ograničenja za određeni brod u pogledu plovidbe koja se odnose na njegovu udaljenost od mjesta zakloništa trebalo bi navesti u Svjedodžbi o sigurnosti putničkog broda.
Instead, Greece should be allowed to classify passenger ships according to the specific sea route in which they operate, while maintaining the same criteria for classes of passenger ships and the same safety standards.
Zbog posebnih geografskih i vremenskih karakteristika te velikog broja otoka kojima su potrebne redovite i česte prometne veze u Grčkoj, i s kopnom ili između njih, te zbog velikog broja mogućih pomorskih veza koji iz toga proizlazi, Grčkoj bi trebalo dopustiti odstupanje od zahtjeva za uspostavu morskih područja.
To avoid unintended negative consequences of the current provisions, in accordance with which converted cargo ships may not be considered to be new passenger ships, it should be clarified that the conversion requirements apply not only to existing passenger ships but to any ship.
Grčkoj bi umjesto toga trebalo dopustiti da putničke brodove klasificira u skladu s posebnim morskim plovnim putem na kojem plove, pritom zadržavajući iste kriterije za klase putničkih brodova i iste sigurnosne norme.
Since, in accordance with Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], a port State may inspect a passenger ship or a high-speed passenger craft flying a flag other than that of the port State, when engaged on domestic voyages, the specific provisions of Article 5(3) of Directive 2009/45/EC are redundant and should be deleted.
Kako bi se izbjegle neželjene negativne posljedice trenutačnih odredaba prema kojima se preinačeni teretni brodovi ne mogu smatrati novim putničkim brodovima, trebalo bi pojasniti da se zahtjevi u pogledu preinake primjenjuju ne samo na postojeće putničke brodove, nego na sve brodove.
In view of the differences in approach between the 1974 SOLAS Convention requirements on damage stability and the specific Union damage stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships contained in Directive 2003/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], the need for Directive 2003/25/EC and its added value should be assessed based on whether those 1974 SOLAS Convention requirements ensure the same safety level.
Budući da u skladu s Direktivom 2009/16/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [5] država luke može obaviti inspekcijski pregled putničkog broda ili brzog putničkog plovila pod zastavom države koja nije država luke kada obavlja nacionalnu plovidbu, posebne odredbe članka 5. stavka 3.
To increase the transparency and to facilitate the notification of exemptions, equivalencies and additional safety measures by Member States, a database should be established and maintained by the Commission.
Direktive 2009/45/EZ suvišne su te bi ih trebalo izbrisati.
It should include the notified measures in their draft and adopted form.
S obzirom na razlike u pristupu između zahtjeva Konvencije SOLAS 1974. u vezi sa stabilitetom u oštećenom stanju i posebnih zahtjeva Unije u vezi sa stabilitetom u oštećenom stanju ro-ro putničkih brodova sadržanih u Direktivi 2003/25/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [6], potrebu za Direktivom 2003/25/EZ i njezinom dodanom vrijednošću trebalo bi ocijeniti na temelju toga osiguravaju li zahtjevi Konvencije SOLAS 1974. istu razinu sigurnosti.
The adopted measures should be made publicly accessible.
Kako bi se povećala transparentnost i olakšalo obavješćivanje o izuzećima, jednakovrijednim zamjenama i dodatnim sigurnosnim mjerama država članica, Komisija bi trebala uspostaviti i održavati bazu podataka.
In view of the changes brought about by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the powers conferred on the Commission to implement Directive 2009/45/EC should be updated accordingly.
Ta bi baza podataka trebala sadržavati prijavljene mjere u obliku nacrta i u donesenoj verziji.
Implementing acts should be adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Donesene mjere trebale bi biti javno dostupne.
In order to take account of developments at international level and experience and to increase transparency, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of not applying, for the purposes of this Directive, amendments to the international instruments, if necessary, and updating the technical requirements.
S obzirom na promjene uvedene Ugovorom o funkcioniranju Europske unije (UFEU) ovlasti dodijeljene Komisiji za provedbu Direktive 2009/45/EZ trebalo bi na odgovarajući način ažurirati.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
Provedbene akte trebalo bi donijeti u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 182/2011 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [7].
In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Kako bi se uzele u obzir promjene na međunarodnoj razini i iskustvo te kako bi se povećala transparentnost, Komisiji bi trebalo delegirati ovlast za donošenje akata u skladu s člankom 290.
Since the specific references in Article 14 to ongoing work in the IMO have become obsolete, that Article should be deleted.
UFEU-a u pogledu neprimjenjivanja, za potrebe ove Direktive, izmjena međunarodnih instrumenata, ako je potrebno, i ažuriranja tehničkih zahtjeva.
However, the general objectives of international action to improve passenger ship safety and to establish a level playing field remain relevant and should be pursued, in accordance with the Treaties.
Posebno je važno da Komisija tijekom svojeg pripremnog rada provede odgovarajuća savjetovanja, uključujući ona na razini stručnjaka, te da se ta savjetovanja provedu u skladu s načelima utvrđenima u Međuinstitucijskom sporazumu o boljoj izradi zakonodavstva od 13. travnja 2016.
To that end, the Member States and the Commission should work within the IMO framework to revise and to improve the regulations of the 1974 SOLAS Convention.
Osobito, s ciljem osiguravanja ravnopravnog sudjelovanja u pripremi delegiranih akata, Europski parlament i Vijeće primaju sve dokumente istodobno kada i stručnjaci iz država članica te njihovi stručnjaci sustavno imaju pristup sastancima stručnih skupina Komisije koji se odnose na pripremu delegiranih akata.
It is important that any penalties laid down by Member States be properly implemented and be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Budući da su posebna upućivanja na trenutačni rad u okviru IMO-a u članku 14. zastarjela, taj bi članak trebalo izbrisati.
In view of the full monitoring cycle of European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) visits, the Commission should evaluate the implementation of Directive 2009/45/EC by 21 December 2026 and submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report thereon.
Međutim, opći ciljevi međunarodnog djelovanja za poboljšanje sigurnosti putničkih brodova i uspostavu jednakih uvjeta i dalje su relevantni te bi se trebali ostvarivati u skladu s Ugovorima.
Member States should cooperate with the Commission to gather all information that is necessary for that evaluation.
Države članice i Komisija u tu bi svrhu trebale djelovati u okviru IMO-a s ciljem revizije i poboljšanja odredaba Konvencije SOLAS 1974.
In order not to impose a disproportionate administrative burden on landlocked Member States which have no seaports and which have no ships flying their flag that fall within the scope of this Directive, such Member States should be allowed to derogate from the provisions of this Directive.
Važno je da se sve sankcije koje utvrđuju države članice pravilno provode i budu učinkovite, proporcionalne i odvraćajuće.
This means that as long as those conditions are fulfilled, they are not obliged to transpose this Directive.
S obzirom na puni ciklus praćenja putem posjeta koje obavlja Europska agencija za pomorsku sigurnost (EMSA), Komisija bi trebala obaviti evaluaciju provedbe Direktive 2009/45/EZ do 21. prosinca 2026. te o tome podnijeti izvješće Europskom parlamentu i Vijeću.
The human element is a fundamental part of ship safety and the procedures related to it.
Države članice trebale bi surađivati s Komisijom na prikupljanju svih informacija potrebnih za tu evaluaciju.
In order to maintain a high level of safety, it is necessary to take into account the link between safety, shipboard living, working conditions and training, including training related to cross-border rescue and emergency operations in line with international requirements.
Kako se neobalnim državama članicama koje nemaju morskih luka i koje pod svojom zastavom nemaju brodove obuhvaćene područjem primjene ove Direktive ne bi nametnulo nerazmjerno administrativno opterećenje, takvim državama članicama trebalo bi dopustiti odstupanje od odredaba ove Direktive.
The Member States and the Commission should therefore play a proactive role at an international level in order to monitor and improve the social dimension for seafarers on board ships.
To znači da one nisu obvezne prenijeti ovu Direktivu sve dok su ispunjeni ti uvjeti.
In order to facilitate the implementation process, EMSA should support the Commission and the Member States in accordance with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8].
Ljudski čimbenik ključan je za sigurnost na brodu i procedure koje su s njom povezane.
Directive 2009/45/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Kako bi se održala visoka razina sigurnosti, nužno je uzeti u obzir povezanost sigurnosti, života na brodu, uvjeta rada i osposobljavanja, uključujući osposobljavanje povezano s prekograničnim spašavanjem i hitnim djelovanjem u skladu s međunarodnim zahtjevima.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Države članice i Komisija trebale bi stoga imati proaktivnu ulogu na međunarodnoj razini s ciljem praćenja i poboljšanja socijalne dimenzije za pomorce na brodovima.
Article 1
Kako bi se olakšao proces provedbe, EMSA bi trebala podupirati Komisiju i države članice u skladu s odgovarajućim odredbama Uredbe (EZ) br. 1406/2002 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [8].
Amendments to Directive 2009/45/EC
Direktivu 2009/45/EZ trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti,
Directive 2009/45/EC is amended as follows:
DONIJELI SU OVU DIREKTIVU:
Article 2 is amended as follows:
Članak 1.
point (a) is replaced by the following:
Izmjene Direktive 2009/45/EZ
“International Conventions” means the following conventions, including their Protocols and amendments thereto, in their up-to-date versions:
Direktiva 2009/45/EZ mijenja se kako slijedi:
the 1974 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (the 1974 SOLAS Convention); and
1. članak 2. mijenja se kako slijedi:
the 1966 International Convention on Load Lines;’;
i. točka (a) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
point (b) is replaced by the following:
‚međunarodne konvencije’znači sljedeće konvencije uključujući protokole uz njih i njihove izmjene, u ažuriranim verzijama:
point (g)(ii) is replaced by the following:
Međunarodna konvencija o zaštiti ljudskog života na moru iz 1974.
their maximum speed, as defined in Regulation 1.4.30 of the 1994 High Speed Craft Code and Regulation 1.4.38 of the 2000 High Speed Craft Code, is less than 20 knots;’;
(Konvencija SOLAS 1974.); i
point (m) is replaced by the following:
Međunarodna konvencija o teretnim linijama iz 1966.;”;
“bow height” means the bow height defined in Regulation 39 of the 1966 International Convention on Load Lines;’;
i. točka (b) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
in point (q), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
‚Kodeks o stabilitetu u neoštećenom stanju’ znači ‚Kodeks o stabilitetu u neoštećenom stanju za sve vrste brodova obuhvaćene instrumentima IMO-a’ koji je dio Rezolucije Skupštine IMO-a A.749(18) od 4. studenoga 1993. ili ‚Međunarodni kodeks o stabilitetu u neoštećenom stanju iz 2008.’ koji je dio Rezolucije IMO-a MSC.267(85) od 4. prosinca 2008., u ažuriranim verzijama;”; (c) točka (g) podtočka ii. zamjenjuje se sljedećim: „ii.
“sea area” means any sea area or sea route established pursuant to Article 4;’;
Međunarodnog pravilnika o brzim plovilima iz 1994. i pravilu 1.4.38.
point (r) is replaced by the following:
Međunarodnog pravilnika o brzim plovilima iz 2000., manja od 20 čvorova;”;
“port area” means an area other than a sea area established pursuant to Article 4, defined by the Member State with jurisdiction over it, extending to the outermost permanent harbour works forming an integral part of the harbour system, or to the limits defined by natural geographical features protecting an estuary or similar sheltered area;’;
točka (m) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
point (s) is deleted;
‚visina pramca’ znači visina pramca definirana pravilom 39.
point (u) is replaced by the following:
Međunarodne konvencije o teretnim linijama iz 1966.;”;
“port State” means a Member State to or from whose port or ports a ship or craft flying a flag other than the flag of that Member State is carrying out domestic voyages;’;
u točki (q) prvi podstavak zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
point (v) is replaced by the following:
‚morsko područje’ znači morsko područje ili morski plovni put utvrđen u skladu s člankom 4.;”;
“recognised organisation” means an organisation recognised in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
točka (r) zamjenjuje se sljedećim: