natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this case, it would have to be found that the criterion regarding an effect on competition and trade between Member States was not met on the date when the scheme was established, since the French market in scheduled public transport by road was not open to competition.
U pogledu programa koje je provodio STIF, jasno je da je program subvencija uveden 2008.
The consequence of this would be that the scheme was not aid at the time it was established.
Dopunom br. 3 ugovora CT1 i da se ne može smatrati nastavkom programa regije unatoč sličnostima obaju programa jer nadležno tijelo koje dodjeljuje subvencije nije isto u oba slučaja.
The Commission cannot accept these two arguments.
U pogledu programa potpora regije strane u postupku koje su izjavile da se radi o postojećem programu potpora naglasile su da je pravna osnova na temelju koje je uveden mehanizam subvencija regije bio dekret br. 49-1473 od 14. studenoga 1949. o koordinaciji i harmonizaciji željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza.
As regards the principal argument, the Commission points out that the 1949 decree did not precisely define any of the key parameters of the scheme: duration, budget, definition of the beneficiaries, type of asset eligible for the subsidy, subsidy rates.
Tim dekretom, ukinutim u rujnu 2012., bilo je predviđeno da „teritorijalna jedinica uprave može subvencionirati uslugu cestovnog prijevoza ako zaključi ugovor s poduzećem kojim će se odrediti obveze koje će morati ispunjavati poduzeće uz obveze koje proizlaze iz njegova pravilnika o poslovanju (članak 19. stavak 1.)”.
On its own, that enactment did not establish any entitlement to receive subsidies.
U tom bi slučaju trebalo zaključiti da je pravna osnova programa prethodila Rimskim ugovorima po čemu bi se mehanizam koji je uvela regija trebao smatrati postojećim programom potpora.
Therefore, the 1949 decree cannot be regarded as the legal basis for the aid mechanism set up by the Region, as described in this Decision.
Nadalje, ako Komisija smatra da nije dovoljna činjenica da je mehanizam koji je uvela regija proveden u općem okviru predviđenom dekretom iz 1949. po kojem se smatra postojećim programom potpora, te iste strane naglašavaju da bi trebalo uzeti u obzir datum na koji je Regionalno vijeće službeno uvelo mehanizam.
As regards the argument in the alternative, it is clear that the case made by the interested parties is vitiated by error.
To bi značilo da program potpora nije bio financijska potpora u vrijeme kada je uspostavljen.
Even if the 1984 decision were to be taken as the legal basis on which the Region's mechanism was established, the Commission points out that the criterion regarding an effect on competition and trade between Member States was already met by that date, for the reasons stated in recital 226.
Komisija ove argumente smatra neutemeljenima.
It should not, therefore, be considered that the mechanism set up by the Region did not constitute aid at the time of its establishment, whatever date is taken as that on which the scheme was established between 1979 and 2008.
U pogledu glavnog argumenta Komisija primjećuje da dekretom iz 1949. nije precizno određen nijedan ključni parametar programa: trajanje, proračun, definicija korisnika, vrsta dobara za koje se može dodijeliti subvencija te stopa subvencije.
If, however, it were to be considered that the establishment of the Region's mechanism dated back to one of the decisions prior to 1994, the question of whether the measures at issue were barred by limitation could arise, since the legal basis for them would date back to more than 10 years prior to the suspension of the limitation, which took effect in May 2004.
Na temelju samog tog teksta ne nastaje nikakvo pravo na dodjelu subvencija.
On this question, the Commission would reply that, even supposing the scheme had been set up before 1994 (for example, by the 1984 decision), the rules on limitation applying with respect to State aid would not jeopardise the conclusion that the aid paid by the Region since 1984 was new aid.
Prema tome, dekret iz 1949. ne može se smatrati pravnom osnovom onakvog mehanizma potpora koji je uvela regija, kakav proizlazi iz opisa sadržanog u ovoj odluci.
Limitation, in fact, attaches only to the payments made before the date of the limitation, and not to the scheme in its entirety.
Mišljenje koje su zainteresirane strane iznijele u pomoćnom argumentu pogrešno je.
The limitation was suspended, however, by the appeal lodged with the national court in May 2004.
Naime, čak i kad bi se odluka iz 1984. smatrala pravnom osnovom na temelju koje je uveden mehanizam regije, Komisija podsjeća da je kriterij utjecaja na tržišno natjecanje i trgovinu među državama članicama na taj datum već bio ispunjen prema mišljenju izraženom u uvodnoj izjavi 226.
This suspension of limitation before the national court also applies to the Commission, as the purpose of the powers of the national court is to safeguard the prerogatives granted to the Commission by Article 108(3) TFEU.
Bez obzira na to koji se datum između 1979. i 2008. smatra datumom uvođenja programa potpora, ne može se smatrati da program nije bila financijska potpora.
Any aid paid by the Region after May 1994, even if the legal basis authorising the award of such aid were to be deemed to be prior to that date, must therefore be considered as being new aid in the current proceedings.
Ako se smatra da je program potpora uveden jednom od odluka donesenih prije 1994., postavlja se pitanje propisivanja spornih mjera jer bi u tom slučaju njihova pravna osnova bila donesena više od deset godina prije no što je u svibnju 2004. prekinuto propisivanje mjera.
Now that the questions relating to existing aid and the possibility of time-barring of the measures at issue have been clarified, the question of the lawfulness of the aid must be addressed.
Komisija po tom pitanju odgovara da, čak i u slučaju da je program uveden prije 1994. (npr. odlukom iz 1984.), na temelju primjenjivih pravila propisivanja mjera državnih potpora ne osporava se zaključak prema kojem su financijske potpore koje je regija dodijelila nakon 1994. zapravo nove financijske potpore.
The investment subsidies awarded by the Region and then by STIF under Rider No 3 to the CT1 were not notified to the Commission.
Naime, propisivanje mjera odnosi se samo na isplate provedene prije datuma propisivanja mjera, a ne na program u cijelosti.
They therefore constitute unlawful aid.
Propisivanje mjera prekinuto je žalbom podnesenom nacionalnom sudu u svibnju 2004.
In the case of the C2 contribution under CT2, Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 provides that compensation awarded in accordance with its principles is exempt from the prior notification requirement referred to in Article 108(3) TFEU.
Ovaj prekid propisivanja mjera vrijedi i za Komisiju jer je nacionalni sud dužan očuvati povlastice dodijeljene Komisiji člankom 108. stavkom 3.
In its judgment in Dilly's Wellnesshotel [35], the Court of Justice made clear that all the conditions of an exemption regulation, including formal conditions, had to be met in order for exemption from the notification requirement to apply.
UFEU-a.
In the case in point, it will be shown in Section 6.3.2 of this Decision that contribution C2 under CT2 meets the substantive criteria laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Svaka potpora koju je regija isplatila nakon svibnja 1994. u okviru ovog postupka smatra se novom potporom, čak i ako je pravna osnova na temelju koje se dopušta dodjela tih potpora prethodila tom datumu.
The Commission notes, however, that the publication requirements laid down in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 were not complied with by STIF.
Budući da je razjašnjeno pitanje postojećih potpora i eventualnog propisivanja spornih mjera, sada se nameće pitanje zakonitosti predmetnih potpora.
The French authorities in fact acknowledged that, as regards the OPTILE undertakings, it was not possible to publish the award notices, despite the requirement to do so in Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Komisija nije obaviještena o subvencijama za ulaganja koje je dodjeljivala regija, a potom i STIF na temelju Dopune br. 3 ugovoru CT1.
As regards the contracts with RATP and SNCF Mobilités, the Commission observes that the award notices were published in the Bulletin officiel des annonces de marché public (Official Bulletin of Public Procurement Notices) and in the Official Journal of the European Union after the award of the contracts and not, as required, at least one year before the direct award date.
Stoga se te potpore smatraju nezakonitima.
Consequently, the provisions of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 were not complied with and the aid awarded by STIF under CT2 was not covered by the exemption from the notification requirement provided for in Article 9 of the Regulation.
U pogledu doprinosa C2 ugovora CT2 u članku 9.
As it was not notified, the Commission concludes that it is unlawful aid.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 navodi se da se naknade dodijeljene u skladu s načelima Uredbe izuzimaju od obveze obavještavanja Komisije u skladu s člankom 108. stavkom 3.
The Commission points out that it is for the national authorities to draw all the necessary conclusions that flow from the unlawfulness of the aid, particularly as regards the recovery of interest in respect of the period of unlawfulness as defined in the CELF judgment [36].
UFEU-a.
Assessment of the compatibility of the measures with the applicable State aid rules
U okviru predmeta Dilly's Wellnesshotel [35] Sud Europske unije objasnio je da svi uvjeti uredbe o izuzeću, uključujući i one službene, moraju biti ispunjeni da bi se izuzeće od obavještavanja moglo primijeniti.
The investment subsidies awarded by the Region and then by STIF under Rider No 3 to the CT1
U tom slučaju u odjeljku 6.3.2. ove odluke bit će dokazano da doprinos C2 ugovora 2.tipa ispunjava samostalne kriterije navedene u Uredbi (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
Having regard to the great similarity between the subsidies awarded by STIF under Rider No 3 to the CT1 and those awarded by the Region during the preceding period, the same reasoning regarding compatibility with the internal market applies to both mechanisms.
S druge strane, Komisija zaključuje da STIF nije ispunio obvezu obavještavanja navedenu u članku 7. stavku 2.
These investment subsidies did not meet the needs of coordination of transport or represent reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service, as was concluded in recitals 206 and 213.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
The Commission cannot, therefore, take Article 93 TFEU (or the secondary legislation deriving from it) as a basis for assessing compatibility with the internal market.
Naime, francuska nadležna tijela priznala su da obavijesti u slučaju dodjele potpora poduzećima organizacije OPTILE nisu mogle biti objavljene unatoč obvezi navedenoj u Uredbi (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
However, under Article 107(3) TFEU, aid may be considered to be compatible with the internal market if it is granted to promote the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
U pogledu ugovora zaključenih s RATP-om i SNCF Mobilités Komisija primjećuje da su obavijesti o dodjeli potpora objavljene u francuskom biltenu javne nabave Bulletin officiel des annonces de marché public i Službenom listu Europske unije tek nakon dodjele ugovora, a ne kako je uvjetovano najmanje godinu dana prije izravne dodjele ugovora.
This can be the case, in particular, with aid for investment which improves the way in which the economic activity in question is carried on.
Prema tome, odredbe članka 7.
The French authorities cite the applicability of this provision to the investment aid mechanism put in place by the Île-de-France Region.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 nisu poštovane, a financijske potpore STIF-a dodijeljene u okviru ugovora CT2 nisu izuzete od obveze obavještavanja Komisije predviđene člankom 9. te Uredbe.
The implementation of an investment aid mechanism for equipment to enable quantitative or qualitative improvements to be made to the supply of scheduled public transport by bus, in excess of the level of obligations which the recipients were required to discharge in providing their services before the subsidies were awarded, was such as to enhance the attractiveness of the services supplied as compared to alternative methods involving travelling by private vehicle.
Budući da nije bila obaviještena o tim potporama, Komisija zaključuje da su te potpore nezakonite.
In so doing, and having regard to the special circumstances in Île-de-France, as stated in recitals 16 and 17, the mechanisms in question contributed to the attainment of the objective of common interest, as defined by the 2011 White Paper on the single European transport area [37], which is modal transfer from the private vehicle to public transport.
Komisija podsjeća da nacionalna nadležna tijela snose sve posljedice nezakonitosti potpora, posebno one koje se odnose na naknade nezakonitih kamata koje su određene u presudi CELF [36].
Without the subsidies, carriers would not have been able to implement those improvements.
Procjena spojivosti mjera s primjenjivim pravilima o državnim potporama
The subsidised routes were in fact running at a loss and their economic balance already depended on the public-service compensations awarded.
Subvencije za ulaganja koje je dodjeljivala regija, a potom i STIF na temelju Dopune br. 3 ugovoru CT1
The Commission notes that the eligible costs and rates for the subsidies were capped, so that only part of the investment costs were taken over directly by the Region and then by STIF.
Te subvencije za ulaganja nisu odgovarale ni potrebama koordinacije prijevoza ni odšteti za obveze koje se mogu pripisati obavljanju javne usluge, kako je zaključeno u uvodnim izjavama 206. i 213.
The maximum subsidy rates reached 50 % for ordinary buses and 60 % for ecological buses, in other words the aid percentages were moderate.
Stoga, pri procjeni spojivosti s unutarnjim tržištem Komisija odluku ne može temeljiti na članku 93.
What is more, the equipment subsidised, very largely buses, could only be marginally assigned to uses or routes other than those for which the subsidy had primarily been granted.
UFEU-a (ili pravu koje iz njega proizlazi).
Firstly, assignment to uses other than the public passenger service was regulated, or indeed prohibited: under the CT1, and in the regional riders from 1999 onwards, any reassignment was prohibited during the period of write-off of the subsidy; before 1999, that practice was regulated for the first five years.
S druge strane, u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 3.
Secondly, vehicles intended for urban transport services carrying passengers most of whom are standing do not lend themselves well to occasional transport requiring the use of coaches fitted out for the transport of seated passengers using seat belts.
UFEU-a mogu se smatrati spojive s unutarnjim tržištem potpore namijenjene olakšavanju razvoja određenih gospodarskih djelatnosti ili određenih gospodarskih regija ako takve potpore ne utječu negativno na trgovinske uvjete u mjeri u kojoj bi to bilo suprotno gospodarskom interesu.
Lastly, though the possibility of effects on trade between Member States could not be ruled out, for the reasons described in recitals 226 and 228, the effects were very probably limited because the markets in question were local in scale, and it was contractually or materially difficult, not to say impossible, to reassign the subsidised equipment to other geographical areas (in France or in Europe).
To može biti slučaj jer se radi o potporama za ulaganja kojima se poboljšava način na koji se predmetna gospodarska aktivnost obavlja.
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that trading conditions were not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest, and that the two mechanisms at issue are compatible with the internal market owing to their conformity with Article 107(3) TFEU.
Francuska nadležna tijela pozivaju se na primjenjivost te odredbe na mehanizam potpora za ulaganja koji je provodila regija Île-de-France.
The C2 contribution in the CT2
Provedba mehanizma potpore za ulaganja u opremu koja omogućuje kvantitativno i kvalitativno poboljšanje ponude redovnog javnog cestovnog prijevoza, koja premašuje razinu obveza na kojoj su prijevoznici morali pružati svoje usluge prije dodjele subvencija, povećala je privlačnost ponude u odnosu na alternativne načine individualnog prijevoza.
The Commission has already concluded in recital 217 that, unlike the subsidies awarded by the Region up to 2008 or by STIF under Rider No 3 to the CT1, the C2 contribution in the CT2 had to be treated as a public-service compensation.
Uzimajući u obzir to i specifičnu situaciju u regiji Île-de-France opisanu u uvodnim izjavama 16. i 17., predmetnim se mehanizmima pridonosilo postizanju cilja od zajedničkog interesa koji je određen u Bijeloj knjizi o jedinstvenom europskom prometnom prostoru iz 2011.
The compatibility of the aid awarded to reimburse the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service is considered by the yardstick of Article 93 TFEU.
[37], a riječ je o prijelazu s vozila pojedinačnog prijevoza na sredstva zajedničkog prijevoza.
With regard to the application of Article 93 TFEU, the Commission takes its inspiration from the broad principles defined in the secondary legislation deriving from Article 93 TFEU, particularly Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, which has been in force since 3 December 2009.
Bez tih subvencija prijevoznici ne bi mogli poboljšati usluge.
The Commission checks, in particular, that the principles set out in Articles 3, 4 and 6 of the Regulation are complied with.
Financirane linije bile su zapravo na gubitku i njihova je gospodarska ravnoteža već ovisila o dodijeljenim naknadama za javne usluge.
Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 provides as follows: ‘Where a competent authority decides to grant the operator of its choice an exclusive right and/or compensation, of whatever nature, in return for the discharge of public-service obligations, it shall do so within the framework of a public-service contract.’
Iz toga proizlazi da su predmetni mehanizmi imali poticajni učinak.
STIF, under Decree No 2005-664 of 10 June 2005, is the organising body for scheduled passenger transport services in Île-de-France, which makes it a competent awarding authority for public-service compensation.
Komisija zaključuje da su i iznos i stopa subvencija bili ograničeni jer je samo jedan dio troškova ulaganja izravno snosila najprije regija, a zatim STIF.
Such compensation, be it component C1 or C2, is awarded in the framework of the CT2, which is a public-service contract.
Najviši iznos subvencija dosezao je 50 % za obične autobuse te 60 % za ekološke autobuse, odnosno za potpore srednjeg intenziteta.
The requirements of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 are therefore met.
Tome treba pridodati činjenicu da je subvencionirana oprema, uglavnom autobusi, mogla biti upotrijebljena samo na onim linijama one za koje je subvencija prvotno dodijeljena, a ne na drugim linijama ili u druge svrhe.
Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 sets out the mandatory content of public-service contracts.
S jedne strane, upotreba opreme u druge svrhe osim za javni prijevoz putnika ograničena je ili čak zabranjena: u okviru ugovora CT1 te u regionalnim dopunama od 1999. nadalje zabranjena je svaka upotreba opreme u druge svrhe tijekom razdoblja amortizacije subvencije; prije 1999. ta je praksa bila ograničena na prvih pet godina.
Under paragraph 1, public-service contracts must:
S druge strane, vozila namijenjena gradskom prijevozu putnika nisu pogodna za povremeni prijevoz za koji su primjereniji turistički autobusi opremljeni za sjedeći prijevoz putnika sa sigurnosnim pojasevima.
clearly define the PSOs with which the public-service operator is to comply, and the geographical areas concerned,
Konačno, iako se ne može isključiti mogućnost utjecaja na trgovinu među državama članicama zbog razloga opisanih u uvodnim izjavama 226. i 228., ona je bila ograničena s obzirom na dimenziju predmetnih tržišta i težinu, odnosno nemogućnost da se ugovorno ili materijalno subvencionirana oprema ponovno financira u drugim zemljopisnim zonama (u Francuskoj ili u Europi).
determine the arrangements for the allocation of costs connected with the provision of services.
UFEU-a.
Under paragraph 2, public-service contracts must determine the arrangements for the allocation of revenue from the sale of tickets.
Doprinos C2 ugovora CT2
Paragraph 3 lays down that the duration of public-service contracts for transport by bus may not exceed 10 years.
Komisija je već u uvodnoj izjavi 217. zaključila da bi, za razliku od subvencija koje je dodjeljivala regija do 2008. ili STIF na temelju Dopune br. 3. ugovora CT1, doprinos C2 ugovora CT2 trebalo smatrati naknadom za obavljanje javne usluge.
Paragraph 6 states that, where operators are required to comply with quality standards, these standards shall be clearly included in the contract.
Procjena spojivosti s unutarnjim tržištem potpora dodijeljenih kao odšteta za obveze koje su svojstvene konceptu javne usluge provodi se na temelju članka 93.
As regards CT2, the Commission finds as follows:
UFEU-a.
The CT2 contract can be described as a public-service contract insofar as, as demonstrated in recitals 214 and 216, it confers responsibility on an operator for the management and operation of the public passenger transport services subject to PSOs.
U članku 3. stavku 1.
The contract provides for a C1 contribution and a C2 contribution which are defined, in a transparent and objective manner, in Article 53 of the CT2.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 navodi se: „Ako nadležno tijelo odluči dodijeliti isključivo pravo i/ili naknadu bilo kakve naravi operatoru po svom izboru u zamjenu za ispunjavanje obveza obavljanja javne usluge, to čini u okviru ugovora o javnim uslugama”.
The existence of a unified financial account for the service means that the costs of providing the services can be allocated in a detailed manner.
STIF je u skladu s dekretom br. 2005-664 od 10. lipnja 2005. subjekt koji organizira redoviti prijevoz putnika u regiji Île-de-France što ga čini nadležnim tijelom za dodjelu naknada za obavljanje javne usluge.
The requirements of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 are therefore met.
Njegove naknade, bez obzira na to radi li se o doprinosima C1 ili C2, dodijeljene su na temelju ugovora CT2, odnosno ugovora o javnim uslugama.
The mechanisms for allocating the revenue from ticket sales are very precisely described in Article 50 of the CT2.
Promatra se usklađenost s člankom 3.
The requirements of Article 4(2) are therefore met.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
The CT2 replaced the CT1, from 2008 onwards, for the remaining period of the term up to 31 December 2016.
U članku 4.
The requirements of Article 4(3) are therefore met.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 definira se obvezan sadržaj ugovora o javnim uslugama:
The CT2 includes quality standards which are clearly defined in the contract.
primjenom stavka 1. navedenog članka ugovorima o javnim uslugama:
The requirements of Article 4(6) are therefore met.
jasno se određuju obveze obavljanja javne usluge kojih se operator javne usluge treba pridržavati, kao i predmetno zemljopisno područje,
Lastly, Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 and the annex thereto describe the main principles governing the determination of public-service compensation:
unaprijed se utvrđuju, na objektivan i transparentan način, parametri na temelju kojih se izračunava plaćanje naknade te priroda i doseg svih dodijeljenih isključivih prava na način koji onemogućuje prekomjernu naknadu,
method of calculating ‘the net financial effect’ of complying with the PSO on the public-service operator's costs and revenues;
određuju se uvjeti raspodjele troškova povezanih s pružanjem usluga.
accounting separation of activities covered by PSOs and those operated commercially;
Primjenom stavka 2. istog članka ugovorima o javnim uslugama određuju se načini raspoređivanja prihoda od prodaje karata.