natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consulting services that were ongoing or were called upon at regular intervals (such as tax and legal advice or advertising) were not eligible for funding.
Smjernica Zajednice o državnim potporama za oglašavanje poljoprivrednih proizvoda utvrđene su mjere koje su se smatrale oblikom tehničke potpore u poljoprivrednom sektoru u smislu točke 14.
Germany argues that it thus constitutes a subsidised service.
Smjernica 2000.–2006.
According to the views expressed by Rhineland-Palatinate, consulting assistance pursuant to the third indent of point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines is not dependent on the dissemination of new methodologies.
Njemačka je dodala da su mjere RP 1 i SL 2, čak i ako ih se, suprotno mišljenju Njemačke, smatra državnom potporom, bile barem u skladu s prethodnom praksom donošenja odluka i stoga bi ih se moglo smatrati materijalno zakonitima.
Such an obligation unquestionably applies to the promotion of ‘other activities for the dissemination of new methods’, in accordance with the fifth indent of point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Njemačka smatra da mjere „aktivnosti odnosa s javnošću” nisu bile ograničene na pojedinu skupinu, nego se njima općenito podupirao cijeli sektor mlijeka i mliječnih proizvoda.
In addition, consulting services that were ongoing or were called upon at regular intervals were expressly excluded from funding under this measure.
U skladu s točkom 14.3. subvencije su mogle pokriti do 100 % troškova.
The conditions laid down in points 14.2 and 14.3 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines are fulfilled, according to the views expressed by Germany, since membership of LKVRP or the service provider is not necessary.
U svojem dopisu od 27. veljače 2015.
Germany gave assurances that the total aid amount of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years was not exceeded.
Njemačka je tvrdila da je državna potpora dodijeljena tijekom razdoblja od tri godine uz najviši iznos od 100000 EUR po korisniku iznosila od 46 EUR do 73 EUR godišnje po korisniku [30].
About 300 milk producers were advised in Rhineland-Palatinate per year and about 100 in Saarland.
RP 5 i SL 5
Given an annual appropriation of about EUR 59000 in Rhineland-Palatinate and about EUR 13000 in Saarland, the average funding per beneficiary is around EUR 197 in Rhineland-Palatinate and EUR 130 in Saarland.
Porajnje-Falačka i Saarland dodijelili su financijsku potporu za programe savjetovanja i osposobljavanja za proizvođače mlijeka radi poboljšanja higijenskih uvjeta opreme za prikupljanje i kvalitete isporučenog mlijeka (podmjere RP 5 i SL 5).
The beneficiaries were farmers (SMEs) and producer associations.
Dokazani troškovi savjetovanja subvencionirani su do najvišeg iznosa od 75000 EUR godišnje u Porajnju-Falačkoj i do 15000 EUR godišnje u Saarlandu.
TH 3 and TH 4
Stalne savjetodavne usluge isključene su iz subvencije.
In addition, the publication of factual information about producers from the region was also subsidised (general public relations, International Day of Milk and Thüringer Milchkönigin) (sub-measure TH 4).
2006.
Material and personnel costs were both eligible for aid.
(94) Cilj je mjera bilo ponuditi stručno savjetovanje u području tehnologije mlijeka i osigurati povezane savjete i osposobljavanje za proizvođače mlijeka odabrane ad hoc nakon što su utvrđeni problemi (kao što je povećanje broja somatskih stanica) u kontekstu ispitivanja kvalitete isporučenog mlijeka, uz sudjelovanje veterinara radi poboljšanja zdravlja vimena, a time i kvalitete sirovog mlijeka.
The beneficiary was LVTM.
Svi proizvođači mlijeka u Porajnju-Falačkoj ili Saarlandu mogli su ostvariti korist od te ponude.
In its comments of 20 September 2013 [32], Germany argued that measure TH 3 should be considered compatible with the internal market (point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines).
Nije bilo nužno članstvo u LKVRP-u ili LVMS-u.
Its purpose was to improve the efficiency and professionalism of agriculture in the Community, thus contributing to the long-term economic viability of the sector.
Stalne savjetodavne usluge ili one koje su se redovito upotrebljavale (kao što su porezno i pravno savjetovanje ili oglašavanje) nisu bile prihvatljive za financiranje.
Participation in trade shows and consumer exhibitions representing the Thuringian dairy industry (e.g. Grüne Tage Thüringen) was governed by the fourth indent of point 14.1, ‘Organisation of Competitions, Exhibitions and Fairs’.
Poljoprivrednicima nisu izvršena nikakva izravna plaćanja.
Germany argued that the measure was not limited to a particular group, but served to support the entire dairy sector in a general manner (see point 14.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines).
Porajnje-Falačka smatra da pomoć u obliku savjetovanja u skladu s točkom 14.1. trećom alinejom Smjernica 2000. – 2006. ne ovisi o širenju novih metodologija.
Earmarked aid did not exceed EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a three-year period.
Smjernica 2000. – 2006. ispunjeni jer nije bilo nužno članstvo u LKVRP-u ili pružatelju usluge.
In its comments dated 20 September 2013 [33], Germany also argued that measure TH 4 focused on ‘general public relations’.
Njemačka je dala jamstva da ukupan iznos potpore od 100000 EUR po korisniku tijekom razdoblja od tri godine nije premašen.
Its purpose was the broad dissemination of up-to-date scientific findings related to the properties of milk and dairy products and therefore constituted a form of technical assistance within the meaning of point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Oko 300 proizvođača mlijeka godišnje primilo je usluge savjetovanja u Porajnju-Falačkoj, a oko 100 u Saarlandu.
The activities of the Landesvereinigung Thüringer Milch e.V. could be classified as consulting fees under the scope of the third indent of point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
S obzirom na godišnja odobrena sredstva od oko 59000 EUR u Porajnju-Falačkoj i oko 13000 EUR u Saarlandu prosječna financijska sredstva po korisniku iznose oko 197 EUR u Porajnju-Falačkoj i 130 EUR u Saarlandu.
Spending on stands and consumer campaigns at trade fairs could be assigned under the fourth indent of point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines (organisation of competitions, exhibitions and fairs).
Korisnici su bili poljoprivrednici (MSP-ovi) i udruženja proizvođača.
Multiplier events disseminating new methods and findings could be assigned under the fifth indent (other activities for the dissemination of new methods).
TH 3 i TH 4
The measure as a whole was not limited to a particular group, but benefited the entire dairy sector in a general manner (point 14.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines).
Tiringija je udruženju Landesvereinigung Thüringer Milch e.V.
The amount of aid granted per beneficiary did not exceed EUR 100000 over a period of three years.
(LVTM) dodijelila financijsku potporu za sudjelovanje u izložbama namijenjenima trgovcima i potrošačima (Grüne Tage Thüringen) te za organizaciju konferencija za širenje znanstvenih informacija (Thüringer Milchtag) (podmjera TH 3).
TH 9 and TH 10
Osim toga, subvencionirano je i objavljivanje činjeničnih informacija o proizvođačima iz regije (odnosi s javnošću, Svjetski dan mlijeka i Thüringer Milchkönigin) (podmjera TH 4).
Thuringia granted financial support for the training of employees in dairy farms (sub-measure TH 9) and for the promotion of professional competitions (sub-measure TH 10).
Za potporu su bili prihvatljivi troškovi materijala i osoblja.
The training courses were aimed at workers on dairy farms and aimed at improving the skills of agricultural workers (certificate of competence in ‘milking’).
Korisnik je bio LVTM.
The measure was coordinated by the Verein Landvolksbildung Thüringen (VLT).
U svojim primjedbama od 20. rujna 2013.
The second measure funded the organisation of professional competitions in the fields of breeding and milking.
[32] Njemačka je tvrdila da bi mjeru TH 3 trebalo smatrati spojivom s unutarnjim tržištem (točka 14.1.
The competitions were organised by Thüringer Landjugendverband e.V.
Smjernica 2000.–2006.).
(TLJV) and Thüringer Melkergemeinschaft e.V.
Njezina je svrha bila poboljšati učinkovitost i stručnost poljoprivrede u Zajednici te time pridonijeti dugoročnoj gospodarskoj održivosti sektora.
(TMG).
Njemačka je tvrdila da mjera nije bila ograničena na pojedinu skupinu, već je općenito služila kao potpora cijelom sektoru mlijeka i mliječnih proizvoda (točka 14.2.
As part of the measure, the preparation and running of competitions and participation in transregional competitions were subsidised.
Smjernica 2000.–2006.).
In its comments of 20 September 2013 [34], Germany claimed that training under sub-measure TH 9 was aimed at employees working at dairy cow farms.
Namijenjena potpora nije premašivala 100000 EUR po korisniku tijekom razdoblja od tri godine.
Training was carried out by Verein Landvolkbildung Thüringen.
U svojim primjedbama od 20. rujna 2013.
Payments were to be classified as a service fee paid to the association in return for services actually provided, calculated and reimbursed at market rates.
[33] Njemačka je tvrdila i da je mjera TH 4 bila usmjerena na „odnose s javnošću”.
Germany thus maintained its view that the State aid conditions pursuant to Article 107 TFEU are not met.
Izdatci za štandove i kampanje za informiranje potrošača na trgovinskim sajmovima mogli bi se svrstati pod točku 14.1. četvrtu alineju Smjernica 2000.–2006. (organizacija natjecanja, izložbi i sajmova).
State aid conditions pursuant to Article 107 TFEU were similarly not met with regard to the training offer to employees either, since the payments were not company-specific.
Sveobuhvatna događanja za širenje novih metoda i nalaza mogla bi se svrstati pod petu alineju (druge aktivnosti za širenje novih metoda).
In the alternative, it was argued that the requirements laid down in point 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines for this measure were satisfied.
Mjera u cjelini nije bila ograničena na pojedinu skupinu, već je općenito koristila cijelom sektoru mlijeka i mliječnih proizvoda (točka 14.2.
This case relates to training for farmers on the abovementioned subjects and thus the requirements laid down in the first indent of point 14.1 were satisfied.
Smjernica 2000.–2006.).
All persons who were active in the area concerned had the opportunity to participate in further training of the type described above, on the basis of objectively defined criteria.
Iznos dodijeljene potpore po korisniku nije premašio 100000 EUR tijekom razdoblja od tri godine.
The maximum allowable limit of EUR 100000 per beneficiary per three-year period was not exceeded (point 14.3).
TH 9 i TH 10
Rather, the cumulative amount of aid under this sub-measure did not exceed EUR 100000 over three years.
Tiringija je dodijelila financijsku potporu za osposobljavanje zaposlenika na mljekarskim gospodarstvima (podmjera TH 9) i za promicanje strukovnih natjecanja (podmjera TH 10).
In its comments of 20 September 2013 [35], Germany also argued in connection with sub-measure TH 10 that the organisation and running of professional competitions in the fields of animal breeding and milk production had been financed under this measure.
Tečajevi su bili usmjereni na radnike na mljekarskim gospodarstvima i na poboljšanje vještina poljoprivrednih radnika (potvrda o osposobljenosti za „prikupljanje mlijeka”).
The competitions were organised by TLJV and TMG.
Mjeru je koordinirao Verein Landvolksbildung Thüringen (VLT).
The organisers received standard market-calculated fees for the organisation and execution of, or participation in, transregional events.
Drugom mjerom financirala se organizacija strukovnih natjecanja u područjima uzgoja i prikupljanja.
As the payments are considered service fees to be offset against equivalent expenses, there was no favourable treatment and hence no legal relevance with respect to State aid.
Njemačka je tvrdila da je osposobljavanje na temelju podmjere TH 9 usmjereno na zaposlenike na gospodarstvima na kojima se drže muzne krave.
In the alternative, it was argued that the requirements laid down in the fourth indent of point 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines for this measure were satisfied.
Osposobljavanje je provodio Verein Landvolkbildung Thüringen.
All persons who were active in the area concerned had the opportunity to participate in professional competitions of the type described above, on the basis of objectively defined criteria.
Plaćanja su se trebala smatrati naknadom za usluge koja se plaća udruženju za usluge koje su stvarno pružene, izračunane i nadoknađene po tržišnim stopama.
Therefore, the conditions laid down in point 14.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines were satisfied.
Njemačka je stoga zadržala svoj stav da uvjeti za državnu potporu iz članka 107.
The maximum allowable limit of EUR 100000 per beneficiary per three-year period laid down in point 14.3 of the Guidelines was not exceeded.
UFEU-a nisu ispunjeni.
Technical assistance from 2007 onwards
Slično tomu, uvjeti za državnu potporu iz članka 107.
Rhineland-Palatinate granted financial support to processing and marketing companies for their participation in events to share knowledge between businesses, competitions, exhibitions and fairs (sub-measure RP 2).
UFEU-a nisu ispunjeni ni kad je riječ o ponudi osposobljavanja za zaposlenike jer se plaćanja nisu odnosila na pojedina društva.
Aid intensity was limited to 10 % of proven costs, but not more than EUR 5200 per business and event.
Najveće dopušteno ograničenje od 100000 EUR po korisniku u razdoblju od tri godine nije premašeno (točka 14.3.).
According to point 105 of the Community guidelines for State aid in the agriculture and forestry sector 2007 to 2013 [36] (hereinafter ‘the 2007-2013 Guidelines’), State aid for the provision of technical support granted to companies active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products must fulfil all the conditions of Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 [37], subsequently replaced by Article 27(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 [38].
Zapravo ni kumulativni iznos potpore na temelju predmetne podmjere nije premašio 100000 EUR tijekom tri godine.
According to those rules, the aid intensity must not exceed 50 % of the eligible costs.
U svojim primjedbama od 20. rujna 2013.
The eligible costs shall be the costs incurred for renting, setting up and running the stand for the first participation of an undertaking in any particular fair or exhibition.
[35] Njemačka je u pogledu podmjere TH 10 tvrdila i da su organizacija i održavanje strukovnih natjecanja u području uzgoja životinja i proizvodnje mlijeka financirani u okviru te mjere.
Point 106 of the 2007-2013 Guidelines provides that state aid towards the cost covered by points 104 and 105 may not be granted to large companies.
Natjecanja su organizirali TLJV i TMG.
Since Germany did not prove that any of the above conditions laid down for technical assistance had been satisfied in relation to this measure, the Commission expressed doubts in the Opening Decision as to its compatibility with the internal market.
Organizatori su primili uobičajene tržišne naknade za organizaciju i provedbu transregionalnih događanja ili sudjelovanje u njima.
The Opening Decision invited Germany to provide a full assessment of the respective measures in the light of the above criteria and to provide appropriate documentation substantiating its answers [39].
Budući da se plaćanja smatraju naknadama za usluge koje se prebijaju istovjetnim izdatcima, nije bilo stavljanja u povoljniji položaj, a time ni pravne relevantnosti s obzirom na državnu potporu.
In its comments dated 20 September 2013 [40], Germany explained that Rhineland-Palatinate would address the concerns of the Commission and amend the eligibility rules for future subsidies such that only the first participation of an undertaking in a particular fair or exhibition could be subsidised.
U slučaju da to nije tako, tvrdilo se da su zahtjevi utvrđeni u točki 14. četvrtoj alineji Smjernica 2000.–2006. za tu mjeru ispunjeni.
Germany argued that the requirements laid down in Section IV.K of the 2007-2013 Guidelines in connection with Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 [41] were thus fulfilled.
Sve osobe koje su djelovale u predmetnom području imale su mogućnost sudjelovanja u strukovnim natjecanjima prethodno opisane vrste, na temelju objektivno utvrđenih kriterija.
The funded projects were re-evaluated by the German authorities having regard to this additional requirement.
Stoga su uvjeti utvrđeni u točki 14.2.
In individual years, the following payments were made in relation to the repeated participation of an enterprise in a particular fair or exhibition.
Smjernica 2000.–2006. ispunjeni.
Year
Najveće dopušteno ograničenje od 100000 EUR po korisniku u razdoblju od tri godine utvrđeno u točki 14.3.
Number
Smjernica nije premašeno.
On 30 June 2016, the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture informed the Commission (see paragraph 16) that measure RP 2 was not limited to SMEs in the period from 2007 onwards.
Porajnje-Falačka dodijelilo je financijsku potporu društvima za preradu i stavljanje na tržište za sudjelovanje u događanjima za dijeljenje znanja među poduzećima, natjecanjima, izložbama i sajmovima (podmjera RP 2).
The two undertakings Hochwald Foods GmbH and MUH Arla eG had also received aid under this measure.
Ta potpora nije bila ograničena na prvo sudjelovanje poduzetnika u pojedinom sajmu ili izložbi.
In its comments dated 13 January 2017, Germany stated that the eligible costs for the sub-measure in question in the period from 2007 onwards had related exclusively to setting up an exhibition stand.
Intenzitet potpore bio je ograničen na 10 % dokazanih troškova, ali potpora nije mogla iznositi više od 5200 EUR po poduzeću i događanju.
No additional costs had been subsidised during this period.
(120) U skladu s točkom 105.
State aid for improving the quality of delivered milk (2001-2006)
Smjernica Zajednice za državne potpore u sektoru poljoprivrede i šumarstva 2007.–2013.
Baden-Württemberg, Lower Saxony and Thuringia (sub-measures BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) granted financial support for improving the quality of the delivered milk through advice and training of dairy producers, the compilation and updating of databases and checks of dairy producers, parallel with the introduction of the ‘Quality Management QM Milk’ quality assurance systems [42].
[36] (dalje u tekstu: „Smjernice 2007.–2013.”) državne potpore za pružanje tehničke pomoći dodijeljene društvima koja djeluju u području prerade i stavljanja na tržište poljoprivrednih proizvoda moraju ispuniti sve uvjete iz članka 5.
The aim of the measures was to improve the quality of delivered milk.
Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 70/2001 [37], koji je poslije zamijenjen člankom 27. stavkom 3.
Neither the training of inspectors with the purpose of obtaining specialised knowledge nor the accreditation of approved laboratories were subsidised.
Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 800/2008 [38].
The final beneficiaries of these sub-measures were milk-producing agricultural SMEs in the primary sector.
U skladu s tim pravilima intenzitet potpore ne smije premašivati 50 % prihvatljivih troškova.
According to Germany, the aid was available to all the farmers in the area concerned who were eligible based on objectively defined conditions [43].
Opravdani troškovi jesu troškovi nastali iznajmljivanjem, postavljanjem i vođenjem štanda za prvo sudjelovanje poduzetnika u pojedinom sajmu ili izložbi.
Between 2001 and 2011, the expended budget (all Länder combined) amounted to EUR 3,3 million.
Točkom 106.
According to information provided by the German authorities, aid intensity was a maximum of 100 % of eligible costs in the years 2001-2011.
Smjernica 2007.–2013. predviđeno je da se državna potpora za troškove obuhvaćene točkama 104. i 105. ne može dodijeliti velikim društvima.
In the Opening Decision, Germany was requested to provide a detailed assessment according to the 2000-2006 Guidelines (in particular point 13.2: maximum 50 % of eligible costs or EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years, whichever is the greater) [44].
U Odluci o pokretanju postupka Njemačka je pozvana da dostavi potpunu procjenu pojedinih mjera s obzirom na navedene kriterije i odgovarajuću dokumentaciju kojom potkrepljuje svoje odgovore [39].
BW 10 and BW 11
U svojim primjedbama od 20. rujna 2013.
According to Germany, the beneficiaries of the activity were milk-producing farms (milk producers) who participated in the QM Milch quality assurance system.
Njemačka je tvrdila da su stoga ispunjeni zahtjevi iz odjeljka IV.K Smjernica 2007.–2013. u vezi s člankom 15. stavkom 2.
In the case of measure BW 10, the performance of audits at dairy farms [46] and the cost of initial certification (introductory farm audit and possibly a follow-up audit) by a recognised certification body were subsidised.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1857/2006 [41].
In the case of measure BW 11, informational and advisory functions were funded in connection with the introduction of quality assurance systems [47].
Njemačka tijela ponovno su ocijenila financirane projekte uzimajući u obzir taj dodatni zahtjev.
According to Germany, these payments are proportionally dependent on the number of milk producers entering the quality management system (QM-Milch).
U svakoj pojedinoj godini sljedeća su plaćanja izvršena u pogledu ponovnog sudjelovanja poduzeća u pojedinom sajmu ili izložbi.
According to Germany, total expenses amounted to EUR 478575.
Godina
Lower Saxony granted financial support for the implementation of a quality assurance system for milk producers (not for processing and marketing firms).
Savezno ministarstvo hrane i poljoprivrede 30. lipnja 2016. obavijestilo je Komisiju (vidjeti točku 16.) da mjera RP 2 nije bila ograničena na MSP-ove u razdoblju od 2007. nadalje.
Since 2003, the costs for the coordination of the quality assurance system and the creation of a database have also been financed.
Njemačka je navela da su se prihvatljivi troškovi za predmetnu podmjeru u razdoblju od 2007. nadalje isključivo odnosili na postavljanje izložbenog štanda.
In its comments of 20 September 2013 [49], Germany argued that the aid granted for consulting services amounted to 50 % of the cost and an amount of EUR 12,78 per case for each farmer, not exceeding the upper threshold indicated in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Tijekom tog razdoblja nisu subvencionirani nikakvi dodani troškovi.
Germany has confirmed that the checks on the farm audits were carried out by or on behalf of third parties.
Baden-Württemberg, Donja Saska i Tiringija (podmjere BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 i TH 5) dodijelili su financijsku potporu za poboljšanje kvalitete isporučenog mlijeka putem savjetovanja i osposobljavanja proizvođačâ mlijeka, izrade i ažuriranja baza podataka te provjera proizvođačâ mlijeka, uz istodobno uvođenje sustavâ osiguranja kvalitete „Upravljanje kvalitetom QM Milch” [42].
The Landeskontrollverband Niedersachsen was commissioned as an independent audit institution.
Cilj je mjera bio poboljšati kvalitetu isporučenog mlijeka.
The measure was introduced in 2004 [50].
Nije subvencionirano osposobljavanje inspektora u svrhu stjecanja specijaliziranog znanja ni akreditiranje odobrenih laboratorija.
According to Germany, expenses for the initial certification, a necessary revision audit after three years and the construction and maintenance of databases were funded from the levy.
Njemačka navodi da je potpora bila dostupna svim poljoprivrednicima u predmetnom području koji su bili prihvatljivi na temelju objektivno utvrđenih uvjeta [43].
In the period 2004-2006, producers were only subsidised with respect to initial certification.
Od 2001. do 2011. potrošena proračunska sredstva (za sve savezne pokrajine) iznosila su 3,3 milijuna EUR.
The average aid granted to individual producers amounted to approximately EUR 83.
U Odluci o pokretanju postupka od Njemačke se zatražilo da dostavi detaljnu procjenu u skladu sa Smjernicama 2000.–2006. (konkretno s točkom 13.2.: najviše 50 % prihvatljivih troškova ili 100000 EUR po korisniku tijekom razdoblja od tri godine, ovisno o tome koji je iznos veći) [44].
The beneficiaries of this measure were milk producers.
BW 10 i BW 11
GROUNDS FOR INITIATING THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
U svojim primjedbama od 20. rujna 2013.