natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That competence granted to the Union legislator reflects the specific nature of the tasks and structure of the EPPO, which is different from that of all other bodies and agencies of the Union and requires special rules regarding judicial review.
Ovom se Uredbom od EPPO-a zahtijeva da posebno poštuje pravo na pošteno suđenje te prava na obranu i pretpostavku nedužnosti, kako su utvrđena u člancima 47. i 48.
According to Article 86(2) TFEU, the EPPO exercises its functions of prosecutor before the competent courts of the Member States.
Povelje.
Acts undertaken by the EPPO in the course of its investigations are closely related to the prosecution which may result therefrom, and thus have effects in the legal order of the Member States.
Člankom 50.
It is therefore appropriate to consider that procedural acts of the EPPO that are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties should be subject to review by the competent national courts in accordance with the requirements and procedures laid down by national law.
EPPO bi stoga trebao djelovati uz potpuno poštovanje tih prava, a ova Uredba trebala bi se primjenjivati i tumačiti na odgovarajući način.
This should ensure that the procedural acts of the EPPO that are adopted before the indictment and intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties (a category which includes the suspect, the victim, and other interested persons whose rights may be adversely affected by such acts) are subject to judicial review by national courts.
Člankom 82. stavkom 2.
Procedural acts that relate to the choice of the Member State whose courts will be competent to hear the prosecution, which is to be determined on the basis of the criteria laid down in this Regulation, are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties and should therefore be subject to judicial review by national courts, at the latest at the trial stage.
UFEU-a Uniji se dopušta da utvrdi minimalna pravila o pravima pojedinaca u kaznenom postupku kako bi se osiguralo poštovanje prava na obranu i pravičnost postupka.
Actions before competent national courts for failures of the EPPO to act are those regarding procedural acts which the EPPO is under a legal obligation to adopt and which are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties.
Ta je minimalna pravila postupno utvrdio zakonodavac Unije u direktivama o posebnim pravima.
Where national law provides for judicial review concerning procedural acts which are not intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties or for legal actions concerning other failures to act, this Regulation should not be interpreted as affecting such legal provisions.
Prava na obranu predviđena u mjerodavnom pravu Unije, poput direktiva 2010/64/EU [4], 2012/13/EU [5], 2013/48/EU [6], (EU) 2016/343 [7], (EU) 2016/1919 [8] Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, kako su provedene nacionalnim pravom, trebala bi se primjenjivati na aktivnosti EPPO-a.
In addition, Member States should not be required to provide for judicial review by the competent national courts of procedural acts which are not intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties, such as the appointment of experts or the reimbursement of witness costs.
Svaki osumnjičenik ili okrivljenik protiv kojeg EPPO pokrene istragu trebao bi imati koristi od tih prava te od prava predviđenih u nacionalnom pravu da zahtijeva određivanje vještaka ili saslušanje svjedoka ili da EPPO na neki drugi način iznese dokaze u ime obrane.
Finally, this Regulation does not affect the powers of national trial courts.
(86) Člankom 86. stavkom 3.
The legality of procedural acts of the EPPO that are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties should be subject to judicial review before national courts.
UFEU-a zakonodavcu Unije dopušta se da utvrdi pravila koja se primjenjuju na sudsko preispitivanje postupovnih mjera koje EPPO poduzima pri obnašanju svojih funkcija.
In that regard, effective remedies should be ensured in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU.
Tom se nadležnošću, dodijeljenom zakonodavcu Unije, odražava posebna priroda zadaća i strukture EPPO-a, koje se razlikuju od svih ostalih tijela i agencija Unije te zahtijevaju posebna pravila o sudskom preispitivanju.
Furthermore, as underlined by the case-law of the Court of Justice, the national procedural rules governing actions for the protection of individual rights granted by Union law must be no less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (principle of equivalence) and must not render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Union law (principle of effectiveness).
U skladu s člankom 86. stavkom 2.
When national courts review the legality of such acts, they may do so on the basis of Union law, including this Regulation, and also on the basis of national law, which applies to the extent that a matter is not dealt with by this Regulation.
UFEU-a EPPO svoje tužiteljske funkcije obnaša pred nadležnim sudovima država članica.
As underlined in the case-law of the Court of Justice, national courts should always refer preliminary questions to the Court of Justice when they entertain doubts about the validity of those acts vis-à-vis Union law.
Radnje koje EPPO poduzima tijekom svojih istraga usko su povezane s kaznenim progonom koji iz njih može proizići te stoga proizvode učinke u pravnim porecima država članica.
However, national courts may not refer to the Court of Justice preliminary questions on the validity of the procedural acts of the EPPO with regard to national procedural law or to national measures transposing Directives, even if this Regulation refers to them.
U mnogim slučajevima te radnje provodit će nacionalna tijela kaznenog progona koja postupaju prema uputama EPPO-a, a u nekim slučajevima nakon ishođenja odobrenja nacionalnog suda.
This is however without prejudice to preliminary references concerning the interpretation of any provision of primary law, including the Treaties and the Charter, or the interpretation and validity of any provision of Union secondary law, including this Regulation and applicable Directives.
Svrha je postupovnih akata koji se odnose na izbor države članice čiji će sudovi biti nadležni za odlučivanje o optužnici, koju treba odrediti na temelju kriterija utvrđenih u ovoj Uredbi, da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane te bi stoga trebali podlijegati sudskom preispitivanju nacionalnih sudova najkasnije u fazi sudskog postupka.
In addition, this Regulation does not exclude the possibility for national courts to review the validity of the procedural acts of the EPPO which are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties with regard to the principle of proportionality as enshrined in national law.
Tužbe pred nadležnim nacionalnim sudovima zbog propuštanja djelovanja EPPO-a jesu one koje se odnose na postupovne akte za koje EPPO ima pravnu obvezu donošenja i čija je svrha da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane.
The provision of this Regulation on judicial review does not alter the powers of the Court of Justice to review the EPPO administrative decisions, which are intended to have legal effects vis-à-vis third parties, namely decisions that are not taken in the performance of its functions of investigating, prosecuting or bringing to judgement.
Ako se nacionalnim pravom predviđa sudsko preispitivanje za postupovne akte čija svrha nije da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane ili za pravne postupke u vezi s drugim propuštanjima djelovanja, ovu Uredbu ne bi trebalo tumačiti kao da utječe na takve pravne odredbe.
This Regulation is also without prejudice to the possibility for a Member State of the European Union, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission to bring actions for annulment in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 263 TFEU and to the first paragraph of Article 265 TFEU, and to infringement proceedings under Articles 258 and 259 TFEU.
Osim toga, od država članica ne bi se trebalo zahtijevati da predvide sudsko preispitivanje, pred nadležnim nacionalnim sudovima, postupovnih akata čija svrha nije da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane, poput određivanja vještakâ ili naknade troškova svjedocima.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] applies to the processing of administrative personal data performed by the EPPO.
Naposljetku, ova Uredba ne utječe na ovlasti nacionalnih sudova pred kojim se vodi postupak.
Consistent and homogeneous application of the rules for the protection of individuals’ fundamental rights and freedoms with regard to the processing of personal data should be ensured throughout the Union.
Zakonitost postupovnih akata EPPO-a čija je svrha da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane trebala bi podlijegati sudskom preispitivanju pred nacionalnim sudovima.
Declaration No 21 on the protection of personal data in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, provides that specific rules on the protection of personal data and the free movement of such data in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation based on Article 16 TFEU may prove to be necessary because of the specific nature of these fields.
U tom pogledu učinkoviti pravni lijekovi trebali bi biti osigurani u skladu s člankom 19. stavkom 1. drugim podstavkom UEU-a.
The rules of this Regulation on the protection of personal data should be interpreted and applied in accordance with the interpretation and application of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10], which will apply to the processing of personal data by competent authorities of the Member States of the European Union for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Nadalje, kako je istaknuto u sudskoj praksi Suda, nacionalna postupovna pravila kojima se uređuju tužbe za zaštitu individualnih prava dodijeljenih pravom Unije ne smiju biti nepovoljnija od onih koja vrijede za slične domaće tužbe (načelo jednakovrijednosti) te se njima ne smije u praksi onemogućiti ili pretjerano otežati ostvarivanje prava dodijeljenih pravom Unije (načelo učinkovitosti).
The data protection principle of fair processing is a distinct notion from the right to a fair trial as defined in Article 47 of the Charter and in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Kada nacionalni sudovi preispituju zakonitost takvih akata, to mogu činiti na temelju prava Unije, među ostalim na temelju ove Uredbe, kao i na temelju nacionalnog prava koje se primjenjuje u onoj mjeri u kojoj neko pitanje nije obuhvaćeno ovom Uredbom.
The data protection provisions of this Regulation are without prejudice to the applicable rules on the admissibility of personal data as evidence in criminal court proceedings.
Kako je istaknuto u sudskoj praksi Suda, nacionalni sudovi trebali bi uvijek uputiti prethodna pitanja Sudu kada imaju dvojbe o valjanosti tih akata u odnosu na pravo Unije.
All Member States of the European Union are affiliated to the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol).
Međutim, nacionalni sudovi ne mogu upućivati prethodna pitanja Sudu o valjanosti postupovnih akata EPPO-a s obzirom na nacionalno postupovno pravo ili nacionalne mjere za prenošenje direktiva, čak ni ako se u ovoj Uredbi upućuje na nacionalno postupovno pravo ili nacionalne mjere za prenošenje direktiva.
To fulfil its mission, Interpol receives, stores and circulates personal data to assist competent authorities in preventing and combating international crime.
Time se, međutim, ne dovode u pitanje prethodna pitanja u vezi s tumačenjem svih odredaba primarnog prava, uključujući Ugovore i Povelju, ili u vezi s tumačenjem i valjanosti svih odredaba sekundarnog prava Unije, uključujući ovu Uredbu i primjenjive direktive.
It is therefore appropriate to strengthen cooperation between the Union and Interpol by promoting an efficient exchange of personal data whilst ensuring respect for fundamental rights and freedoms regarding the automatic processing of personal data.
Osim toga, ovom se Uredbom ne isključuje mogućnost da nacionalni sudovi preispitaju valjanost postupovnih akata EPPO-a čija je svrha da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane s obzirom na načelo proporcionalnosti kako je utvrđeno u nacionalnom pravu.
Where operational personal data are transferred from the EPPO to Interpol, and to countries which have delegated members to Interpol, this Regulation, in particular the provisions on international transfers, should apply.
Odredbom ove Uredbe o sudskom preispitivanju ne mijenjaju se ovlasti Suda za preispitivanje administrativnih odluka EPPO-a čija je svrha da proizvode pravne učinke u odnosu na treće strane, odnosno odluka koje se ne donose u obavljanju njegovih funkcija vođenja istraga, kaznenog progona ili podizanja optužnica.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the specific rules laid down in Council Common Position 2005/69/JHA [11] and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA [12].
Ovom se Uredbom ne dovodi u pitanje ni mogućnost da država članica Europske unije, Europski parlament, Vijeće ili Komisija pokrenu postupak za poništenje u skladu s člankom 263. drugim stavkom UFEU-a i člankom 265. prvim stavkom UFEU-a niti se njome dovodi u pitanje postupak zbog povrede obveze na temelju članaka 258. i 259.
When the EPPO transfers operational personal data to an authority of a third country or to an international organisation or Interpol by virtue of an international agreement concluded pursuant to Article 218 TFEU, appropriate safeguards for the protection of privacy and the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals should ensure that the data protection provisions of this Regulation are complied with.
UFEU-a.
In order to ensure effective, reliable and consistent monitoring of compliance with and enforcement of this Regulation as regards operational personal data, as required by Article 8 of the Charter, the European Data Protection Supervisor should have the tasks laid down in this Regulation and should have effective powers, including investigative, corrective, and advisory powers which constitute the necessary means to perform those tasks.
(90) Uredba (EZ) br. 45/2001 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [9] primjenjuje se na obradu administrativnih osobnih podataka koju obavlja EPPO.
However, the powers of the European Data Protection Supervisor should not unduly interfere with specific rules for criminal proceedings, including investigation and prosecution of criminal offences, or the independence of the judiciary.
Širom Unije trebalo bi osigurati dosljednu i ujednačenu primjenu pravila o zaštiti temeljnih prava i sloboda pojedinaca u vezi s obradom osobnih podataka.
In order to enable the EPPO to fulfil its tasks and to take account of developments in information technology, and in light of the state of progress in the information society, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of listing and updating the list of the categories of operational personal data and the categories of data subjects listed in an Annex.
U Izjavi br. 21 o zaštiti osobnih podataka u područjima pravosudne suradnje u kaznenim stvarima i policijske suradnje, priloženoj UEU-u i UFEU-u, stoji da se posebna pravila o zaštiti osobnih podataka i slobodnom kretanju takvih podataka u područjima pravosudne suradnje u kaznenim stvarima i policijske suradnje na temelju članka 16.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 [13].
UFEU-a mogu pokazati potrebnima zbog posebne naravi tih područja.
In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council should receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts should systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert group dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Pravila ove Uredbe o zaštiti osobnih podataka trebalo bi tumačiti i primjenjivati u skladu s tumačenjem i primjenom Direktive (EU) 2016/680 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [10], koja će se primjenjivati na obradu osobnih podataka od strane nadležnih tijela država članica Europske unije u svrhu sprečavanja, istrage, otkrivanja ili progona kaznenih djela ili izvršavanja kaznih sankcija.
The EPPO should work closely with other institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union in order to facilitate the exercise of its functions under this Regulation and establish, where necessary, formal arrangements on detailed rules relating to exchange of information and cooperation.
Načelo poštene obrade iz područja zaštite podataka koncept je koji je odvojen od prava na pošteno suđenje, kako je definirano u članku 47.
Cooperation with Europol and OLAF should be of particular importance to avoid duplication and enable the EPPO to obtain the relevant information in their possession, as well as to draw on their analysis in specific investigations.
Povelje i članku 6.
The EPPO should be able to obtain any relevant information that falls within its competence stored in databases and registers of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union.
Europske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda.
The EPPO and Eurojust should become partners and should cooperate in operational matters in accordance with their respective mandates.
Odredbama o zaštiti podataka u ovoj Uredbi ne dovode se u pitanje primjenjiva pravila o dopuštenosti osobnih podataka kao dokaza u sudskim postupcima u kaznenim predmetima.
Such cooperation may involve any investigations conducted by the EPPO where an exchange of information or coordination of investigative measures in respect of cases within the competence of Eurojust is considered to be necessary or appropriate.
Sve države članice Europske unije učlanjene su u Međunarodnu organizaciju kriminalističke policije (Interpol).
Whenever the EPPO is requesting such cooperation of Eurojust, the EPPO should liaise with the Eurojust national member of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor’s Member State.
Kako bi ispunio svoju misiju, Interpol prima, pohranjuje i prosljeđuje osobne podatke radi pružanja pomoći nadležnim tijelima u sprečavanju i suzbijanju međunarodnog kriminala.
The operational cooperation may also involve third countries that have a cooperation agreement with Eurojust.
Stoga je primjereno ojačati suradnju između Unije i Interpola poticanjem učinkovite razmjene osobnih podataka, osiguravajući pritom poštovanje temeljnih prava i sloboda u vezi s automatskom obradom osobnih podataka.
The EPPO and OLAF should establish and maintain a close cooperation aimed at ensuring the complementarity of their respective mandates, and avoiding duplication.
Ako se operativni osobni podaci iz EPPO-a prenose Interpolu i zemljama koje imaju svoje predstavnike u Interpolu, trebala bi se primjenjivati ova Uredba, a osobito odredbe o međunarodnim prijenosima.
In that regard, OLAF should in principle not open any administrative investigations parallel to an investigation conducted by the EPPO into the same facts.
Ovom se Uredbom ne bi trebala dovoditi u pitanje posebna pravila utvrđena u Zajedničkom stajalištu Vijeća 2005/69/PUP [11] i Odluci Vijeća 2007/533/PUP [12].
This should, however, be without prejudice to the power of OLAF to start an administrative investigation on its own initiative, in close consultation with the EPPO.
Kada EPPO operativne osobne podatke prenosi tijelu treće zemlje ili međunarodnoj organizaciji ili Interpolu na temelju međunarodnog sporazuma sklopljenog u skladu s člankom 218.
In all actions in support of the EPPO, OLAF will act independently of the Commission, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [14].
UFEU-a, odgovarajućim zaštitnim mjerama za zaštitu privatnosti i temeljnih prava i sloboda pojedinaca trebalo bi osigurati poštovanje odredaba o zaštiti podataka iz ove Uredbe.
In cases where the EPPO is not conducting an investigation, it should be able to provide relevant information to allow OLAF to consider appropriate action in accordance with its mandate.
Kako bi se osiguralo djelotvorno, pouzdano i dosljedno praćenje poštovanja ove Uredbe i njezine provedbe u vezi s operativnim osobnim podacima, kako se zahtijeva člankom 8.
In particular, the EPPO could consider informing OLAF of cases where there are no reasonable grounds to believe that an offence within the competence of the EPPO is being or has been committed, but an administrative investigation by OLAF may be appropriate, or where the EPPO dismisses a case and a referral to OLAF is desirable for administrative follow-up or recovery.
Povelje, Europski nadzornik za zaštitu podataka trebao bi imati zadaće utvrđene u ovoj Uredbi i trebao bi imati stvarne ovlasti, među ostalim istražne, korektivne i savjetodavne ovlasti koje predstavljaju sredstva potrebna za obavljanje tih zadaća.
When the EPPO provides information, it may request that OLAF considers whether to open an administrative investigation or take other administrative follow-up or monitoring action, in particular for the purposes of precautionary measures, recovery or disciplinary action, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013.
Međutim, ovlastima Europskog nadzornika za zaštitu podataka ne bi trebalo nepotrebno ometati posebna pravila kaznenog postupka, uključujući istragu i progon kaznenih djela, kao ni neovisnost pravosuđa.
To the extent that recovery procedures are deferred as a result of decisions taken by the EPPO in connection with investigations or prosecutions under this Regulation, Member States should not be considered at fault or negligent for the purposes of recovery procedures within the meaning of Article 122 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [15].
Kako bi se EPPO-u omogućilo ispunjavanje njegovih zadaća i uzelo u obzir razvoj u informacijskoj tehnologiji te s obzirom na stanje napretka informacijskog društva, Komisiji bi trebalo delegirati ovlast za donošenje akata u skladu s člankom 290.
The EPPO should enable the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union and other victims to take appropriate measures.
UFEU-a u vezi s izradom i ažuriranjem popisa kategorija operativnih osobnih podataka i kategorija ispitanika navedenih u Prilogu.
This may include taking precautionary measures, in particular to prevent any continuous wrongdoing or to protect the Union from reputational damage, or to allow them to intervene as a civil party in the proceedings in accordance with national law.
Posebno je važno da Komisija tijekom svojeg pripremnog rada provede odgovarajuća savjetovanja, uključujući ona na razini stručnjaka, te da se ta savjetovanja provedu u skladu s načelima utvrđenima u Međuinstitucionalnom sporazumu o boljoj izradi zakonodavstva od 13. travnja 2016.
The exchange of information should take place in a manner that fully respects the independence of the EPPO, and only to the extent possible, without any prejudice to the proper conduct and confidentiality of investigations.
Osobito, s ciljem osiguravanja ravnopravnog sudjelovanja u pripremi delegiranih akata, Europski parlament i Vijeće trebali bi primiti sve dokumente istodobno kada i stručnjaci iz država članica te bi njihovi stručnjaci trebali sustavno imati pristup sastancima stručne skupine Komisije koji se odnose na pripremu delegiranih akata.