natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, the proprietor should not be entitled to prevent the fair and honest use of the EU trade mark for the purpose of identifying or referring to the goods or services as those of the proprietor.
Ekskluzivna prava koja proizlaze iz žiga EU-a ne bi nositelju trebala davati pravo da trećim stranama zabrani uporabu znakova ili oznaka koji se upotrebljavaju pošteno i stoga u skladu s dobrom poslovnom praksom u industriji i trgovini.
Use of a trade mark by third parties to draw the consumer's attention to the resale of genuine goods that were originally sold by or with the consent of the proprietor of the EU trade mark in the Union should be considered as being fair as long as it is at the same time in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
Kako bi osigurali jednake uvjete za trgovačke nazive i žigove EU-a u slučaju sukoba u s obzirom na to da se trgovačkim nazivima redovito pruža neograničena zaštita u odnosu na kasnije žigove, za takvu uporabu trebalo bi smatrati samo da uključuje uporabu osobnog imena treće strane.
Use of a trade mark by third parties for the purpose of artistic expression should be considered as being fair as long as it is at the same time in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
Nadalje, trebalo bi dopustiti uporabu opisnih ili nerazlikovnih znakova ili oznaka općenito.
Furthermore, this Regulation should be applied in a way that ensures full respect for fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the freedom of expression.
Nadalje, nositelj ne bi smio biti ovlašten spriječiti poštenu i pravednu uporabu žiga EU-a za potrebe utvrđivanja proizvoda ili usluga kao nositeljevih ili upućivanja na njih.
It follows from the principle of free movement of goods that it is essential that the proprietor of an EU trade mark not be entitled to prohibit its use by a third party in relation to goods which have been put into circulation in the European Economic Area, under the trade mark, by him or with his consent, save where there exist legitimate reasons for the proprietor to oppose further commercialisation of the goods.
Uporabu žiga od trećih strana radi skretanja pozornosti potrošača na preprodaju izvornih proizvoda koji su prvotno bili prodani od strane nositelja žiga EU-a u Uniji ili uz njegovo odobrenje trebalo bi smatrati poštenom dokle god je istodobno u skladu i s dobrom poslovnom praksom u industriji i trgovini.
In order to ensure legal certainty and safeguard legitimately acquired trade mark rights, it is appropriate and necessary to lay down, without prejudice to the principle that the later trade mark cannot be enforced against the earlier trade mark, that proprietors of EU trade marks should not be entitled to oppose the use of a later trade mark if the later trade mark was acquired at a time when the earlier trade mark could not be enforced against the later trade mark.
Uporabu žiga od trećih strana za potrebe umjetničkog izražavanja trebalo bi smatratipoštenom dokle god je istodobno u skladu s dobrom poslovnom praksom u industriji i trgovini.
There is no justification for protecting EU trade marks or, as against them, any trade mark which has been registered before them, except where the trade marks are actually used.
Nadalje, ova Uredba trebala bi se primjenjivati tako da se osigura potpuno poštovanje temeljnih prava i sloboda, posebno slobode izražavanja.
For reasons of equity and legal certainty, the use of an EU trade mark in a form that differs in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of that mark in the form in which it is registered should be sufficient to preserve the rights conferred regardless of whether the trade mark in the form as used is also registered.
Iz načela slobodnog kretanja robe proizlazi da je nužno da nositelj žiga Unije nema pravo zabraniti trećoj strani njegovu uporabu u odnosu na proizvode koje je, pod tim žigom, sam stavio u promet u europskome gospodarskom području ili je to učinjeno uz njegovu suglasnost, osim kada nositelj žiga ima opravdane razloge za protivljenje daljnjoj komercijalizaciji proizvoda.
An EU trade mark is to be regarded as an object of property which exists separately from the undertakings whose goods or services are designated by it.
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost i sačuvala zakonito stečena prava u pogledu žiga, primjereno je i nužno utvrditi da, ne dovodeći u pitanje načelo prema kojemu se prava iz kasnijeg žiga ne mogu ostvarivati protiv ranijeg žiga, nositelji žiga EU-a ne bi trebali imati pravo protiviti se uporabi kasnijeg žiga ako je kasniji žig stečen u vrijeme kada se prava iz ranijeg žiga nisu mogla ostvarivati protiv kasnijeg žiga.
Accordingly, it should be capable of being transferred, of being charged as security in favour of a third party and of being the subject matter of licences.
Nema opravdanja za zaštitu žigova ili, u odnosu na njih, svakog žiga registriranog prije njih, osim ako se ti žigovi stvarno rabe.
Administrative measures are necessary at Union level for implementing in relation to every trade mark the trade mark law laid down by this Regulation.
Zbog pravičnosti i pravne sigurnosti uporaba žiga EU-a u obliku koji se razlikuje u elementima koji ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga, u odnosu na oblik u kojem je registriran, treba biti dovoljna za očuvanje prava koja proizlaze iz njega, neovisno o tome je li žig registriran i u obliku u kojem se rabi.
It is therefore essential, while retaining the Union's existing institutional structure and balance of powers, to provide for a European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’) which is independent in relation to technical matters and has legal, administrative and financial autonomy.
Žig EU-a trebao bi se smatrati predmetom vlasništva koji postoji neovisno o poduzećima čiji su proizvodi ili usluge njime obilježeni.
To this end it is necessary and appropriate that the Office should be a body of the Union having legal personality and exercising the powers which are conferred on it by this Regulation, and that it should operate within the framework of Union law without detracting from the competences exercised by the Union institutions.
Sukladno tome, on bi trebao biti prenosiv, biti predmetom zaloga u korist treće strane, odnosno predmetom licencije.
EU trade mark protection is granted in relation to specific goods or services whose nature and number determine the extent of protection afforded to the trade mark proprietor.
Upravne mjere potrebne su na razini Unije za provedbu, u odnosu na svaki žig, pravnog propisa o žigu utvrđenog ovom Uredbom.
It is therefore essential to lay down rules for the designation and classification of goods and services in this Regulation and to ensure legal certainty and sound administration by requiring that the goods and services for which trade mark protection is sought are identified by the applicant with sufficient clarity and precision to enable the competent authorities and economic operators, on the basis of the application alone, to determine the extent of the protection applied for.
Stoga je potrebno, zadržavajući istodobno postojeći institucionalni ustroj Unije i ravnotežu ovlasti, osnovati Ured Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo („Ured”) koji je neovisan u odnosu na tehnička pitanja, te posjeduje pravnu, upravnu i financijsku autonomiju.
The use of general terms should be interpreted as only including all goods and services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the term.
U tu je svrhu potrebno i primjereno da Ured bude tijelo Unije koje posjeduje pravnu osobnost i izvršava ovlasti koje su mu dodijeljene ovom Uredbom, te da djeluje u okviru prava Unije bez umanjivanja nadležnosti koje imaju institucije Unije.
Proprietors of EU trade marks, which because of the practice of the Office prior to 22 June 2012 were registered in respect of the entire heading of a class of the system of classification established by the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, should be given the possibility to adapt their lists of goods and services in order to ensure that the content of the Register meets the requisite standard of clarity and precision in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Zaštita žiga EU-a dodjeljuje se za određene proizvode ili usluge čija narav i broj određuju opseg zaštite koja se pruža nositelju žiga.
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in registering an EU trade mark, it is appropriate to lay down a regime of optional EU and national trade mark searches that should be flexible in terms of user needs and preferences.
Stoga je ključno utvrditi pravila za označivanje i klasifikaciju proizvoda i usluga u ovoj Uredbi te osigurati pravnu sigurnost i dobro upravljanje zahtijevajući da podnositelj prijave dovoljno jasno i precizno naznači proizvode i usluge za koje se traži zaštita žiga kako bi se nadležnim tijelima i gospodarskim subjektima omogućilo da na temelju same prijave odrede opseg zaštite za koju je podnesena prijava.
The optional EU and national trade mark searches should be complemented by the making available of all-encompassing, fast and powerful search engines for the use of the public free of charge within the context of cooperation between the Office and the central industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property.
Uporabu općenitih izraza trebalo bi tumačiti kao da uključuje samo sve proizvode i usluge jasno obuhvaćene doslovnim značenjem izraza.
It is necessary to ensure that parties who are affected by decisions made by the Office are protected by the law in a manner which is suited to the special character of trade mark law.
Nositelji žigova EU-a, koji su zbog prakse Ureda prije 22. lipnja 2012. bili registrirani u odnosu na cijeli naslov razreda sustava klasifikacije ustanovljenoga Nicanskim sporazumom o međunarodnoj klasifikaciji roba i usluga u svrhu registriranja žigova od 15. lipnja 1957., trebali bi imati mogućnost prilagodbe svojih popisa proizvoda i usluga kako bi se osiguralo da sadržaj registra zadovoljava potreban standard jasnoće i preciznosti u skladu sa sudskom praksom Suda Europske unije.
To that end, provision should be made for an appeal to lie from decisions of the various decision-making instances of the Office.
Kako bi se izbjegla nepotrebna kašnjenja prilikom registracije žiga EU-a, primjereno je utvrditi režim neobaveznog pretraživanja žigova EU-a i nacionalnih žigova koji treba biti fleksibilniji u pogledu potreba i izbora korisnika.
A Board of Appeal of the Office should decide on the appeal.
Neobavezno pretraživanje žiga EU-a i nacionalnih žigova trebalo bi dopuniti stavljanjem na raspolaganje sveobuhvatnih, brzih i snažnih tražilica koje javnost može besplatno upotrebljavati u kontekstu suradnje Ureda s središnjim uredima država članica za industrijsko vlasništvo, uključujući Ured Beneluksa za intelektualno vlasništvo.
Decisions of the Boards of Appeal should, in turn, be amenable to actions before the General Court, which has jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.
Potrebno je osigurati da su stranke na koje se odnose odluke Ureda zaštićene zakonom na način koji odgovara posebnom karakteru zakona o žigu.
In order to ensure the protection of EU trade marks the Member States should designate, having regard to their own national system, as limited a number as possible of national courts of first and second instance having jurisdiction in matters of infringement and validity of EU trade marks.
U tu je svrhu potrebno predvidjeti žalbu koja bi se trebala uvažiti na temelju odluka ispitivača i različitih tijela Ureda nadležnih za odlučivanje.
It is essential that decisions regarding the validity and infringement of EU trade marks have effect and cover the entire area of the Union, as this is the only way of preventing inconsistent decisions on the part of the courts and the Office and of ensuring that the unitary character of EU trade marks is not undermined.
Žalbeno vijeće pri Uredu treba odlučiti o žalbi.
The provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] should apply to all actions at law relating to EU trade marks, save where this Regulation derogates from those rules.
Potrebno je da i same odluke žalbenih vijeća podliježu tužbama pred Općim sudom, koji je nadležan za poništenje ili izmjenu osporavane odluke.
Contradictory judgments should be avoided in actions which involve the same acts and the same parties and which are brought on the basis of an EU trade mark and parallel national trade marks.
Kako bi osigurale zaštitu žigova EU-a, države članice trebale bi odrediti, uzimajući u obzir svoj nacionalni sustav, što je moguće manji broj nacionalnih sudova prvog i drugog stupnja koji bi imali nadležnost u pitanjima povrede i valjanosti žigova EU-a.
For this purpose, when the actions are brought in the same Member State, the way in which this is to be achieved is a matter for national procedural rules, which are not prejudiced by this Regulation, whilst when the actions are brought in different Member States, provisions modelled on the rules on lis pendens and related actions of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 appear appropriate.
Nužno je da odluke u vezi s valjanošću i povredom žigova EU-a imaju učinak na cijelom području Unije i da pokrivaju cijelo područje Unije, s obzirom da je to jedini način sprečavanja donošenja nedosljednih odluka od strane sudova i Ureda, te osiguranja da se neće narušiti jedinstveni karakter žigova EU-a.
With the aim of promoting convergence of practices and of developing common tools, it is necessary to establish an appropriate framework for cooperation between the Office and the industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property, defining key areas of cooperation and enabling the Office to coordinate relevant common projects of interest to the Union and the Member States and to finance, up to a maximum amount, those projects.
Pravila sadržana u Uredbi (EU) br. 1215/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 12. prosinca 2012.
Those cooperation activities should be beneficial for undertakings using trade mark systems in Europe.
[9] trebala bi se primjenjivati na sve postupke prema zakonu vezane za žigove EU-a, osim kada ova Uredba odstupa od tih pravila.
For users of the Union regime laid down in this Regulation, the projects, particularly the databases for search and consultation purposes, should provide additional, inclusive, efficient tools that are free of charge to comply with the specific requirements arising from the unitary character of the EU trade mark.
Trebalo bi izbjegavati proturječne presude u postupcima u koje su uključene iste stranke, o istim činjenicama na temelju žiga EU-a i usporednih nacionalnih žigova.
It is desirable to facilitate friendly, expeditious and efficient dispute resolution by entrusting the Office with the establishment of a mediation centre the services of which could be used by any person with the aim of achieving a friendly settlement of disputes relating to EU trade marks and Community designs by mutual agreement.
U tu svrhu ako se postupci vode u istoj državi članici, način na koji se to postiže jest pitanje nacionalnih postupovnih pravila koja se ne dovode u pitanje ovom Uredbom, dok se u slučaju kada se postupci vode u različitim državama članicama, odredbe donesene po uzoru na pravila o lis pendens i povezanim postupcima iz gore spomenute Uredbe (EU) br.
The setting up of the EU trade mark system has resulted in increased financial burdens for the central industrial property offices and other authorities of the Member States.
1215/2012 čine primjerenima.
The additional costs are related to the handling of a higher number of opposition and invalidity proceedings involving EU trade marks or brought by proprietors of such trade marks; to the awareness-raising activities linked to the EU trade mark system; as well as to activities intended to ensure the enforcement of EU trade mark rights.
S ciljem promicanja konvergencije praksi i razvoja zajedničkih alata potrebno je uspostaviti prikladan okvir za suradnju između Ureda i uredâ država članica za industrijsko vlasništvo, uključujući Ured Beneluksa za intelektualno vlasništvo, određujući pritom ključna područja suradnje i omogućujući Uredu koordinaciju odgovarajućih zajedničkih projekata u interesu Unije i država članica te financiranje tih projekata do najvećeg mogućeg iznosa.
It is, therefore, appropriate to ensure that the Office offset part of the costs incurred by Member States for the role they play in ensuring the smooth functioning of the EU trade mark system.
Navedene aktivnosti suradnje trebale bi biti korisne za poduzeća koja rabe sustave žiga u Europi.
The payment of such offsetting should be subject to the submission, by Member States, of relevant statistical data.
Za korisnike režima Unije utvrđenoga u ovoj Uredbi projekti bi, posebice baze podataka za pretraživanje i pregled, trebali pružiti dodatne, uključive, učinkovite i besplatne alate radi usklađenosti s posebnim zahtjevima koji proizlaze iz jedinstvenog karaktera žiga EU-a.
The offsetting of costs should not be of such an extent that it would cause a budgetary deficit for the Office.
Poželjno je omogućiti prijateljsko, brzo i učinkovito rješavanje sporova na način da se Uredu povjeri osnivanje centra za posredovanje čijim bi se uslugama mogle služiti sve osobe s ciljem prijateljskog rješavanja sporova koji se odnose na žigove EU-a i dizajne Zajednice.
In order to guarantee the full autonomy and independence of the Office, it is considered necessary to grant it an autonomous budget whose revenue comes principally from fees paid by the users of the system.
Uspostava sustava žiga EU-a dovela je do većih financijskih opterećenja središnjih ureda za industrijsko vlasništvo i drugih tijela država članica.
However, the Union budgetary procedure remains applicable as far as any subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the Union are concerned.
Dodatni troškovi povezani su s obradom većeg broja postupaka prigovora i postupaka za proglašenje ništavosti koji uključuju žig EU-a odnosno koje su pokrenuli nositelji takva žiga, s aktivnostima podizanja svijesti povezanima sa sustavom žiga EU-a kao i aktivnostima namijenjenima osiguravanju izvršenja prava žiga EU-a.
Moreover, the auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors.
Stoga je primjereno osigurati da Ured nadoknadi dijelove troškova država članica za ulogu koju imaju u osiguravanju neometanog funkcioniranja žiga EU-a.
In the interest of sound financial management, the accumulation by the Office of significant budgetary surpluses should be avoided.
Takvu nadoknadu trebalo bi uvjetovati podnošenjem, od strane država članica, odgovarajućih statističkih podataka.
This should be without prejudice to the Office maintaining a financial reserve covering one year of its operational expenditure to ensure the continuity of its operations and the performance of its tasks.
Nadoknada troškova ne bi smjela biti tolika da izazove proračunski deficit Ureda.
That reserve should only be used to ensure the continuity of the tasks of the Office as specified in this Regulation.
Kako bi se zajamčila potpuna autonomija i neovisnost Ureda, smatra se potrebnim odobriti mu samostalan proračun čiji prihod u načelu proizlazi iz pristojbi koje uplaćuju korisnici sustava.
Given the essential importance of the amounts of fees payable to the Office for the functioning of the EU trade mark system and its complementary relationship as regards national trade mark systems, it is necessary to set those fee amounts directly in this Regulation in the form of an annex.
Međutim, proračunski postupak Unije i dalje se primjenjuje kad se radi o svim subvencijama koje se isplaćuju iz glavnog proračuna Unije.
The amounts of the fees should be fixed at a level which ensures that: first, the revenue they produce is in principle sufficient for the budget of the Office to be balanced; second, there is coexistence and complementarity between the EU trade mark and the national trade mark systems, also taking into account the size of the market covered by the EU trade mark and the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises; and third, the rights of proprietors of an EU trade mark are enforced efficiently in the Member States.
Nadalje, reviziju financijskih izvještaja trebao bi obaviti Revizorski sud.
In order to ensure an effective, efficient and expeditious examination and registration of EU trade mark applications by the Office using procedures which are transparent, thorough, fair and equitable, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the procedures for filing and examining an opposition and on the procedures governing the amendment of the application.
U interesu dobrog financijskog upravljanja trebalo bi izbjegavati nakupljanje znatnih proračunskih viškova Ureda.
In order to ensure that an EU trade mark can be revoked or declared invalid in an effective and efficient way by means of transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedures, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the procedures for revocation and declaration of invalidity.
Time se ne bi smjelo dovesti u pitanje zadržavanje financijske rezerve Ureda kojom se pokriva jedna godina njegovih operativnih rashoda kako bi se osigurao kontinuitet njegova poslovanja i izvršavanje njegovih zadaća.
In order to allow for an effective, efficient and complete review of decisions of the Office by the Boards of Appeal by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedure which takes into account the principles laid down in this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the formal content of the notice of appeal, the procedure for the filing and examination of an appeal, the formal content and form of the Board of Appeal's decisions, and the reimbursement of the appeal fees.
Tom rezervom trebalo bi se koristiti isključivo kako bi se osigurao kontinuitet zadaća Ureda kako su navedene u ovoj Uredbi.
In order to ensure a smooth, effective and efficient operation of the EU trade mark system, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the requirements as to the details on oral proceedings and the detailed arrangements for taking of evidence, the detailed arrangements for notification, the means of communication and the forms to be used by the parties to proceedings, the rules governing the calculation and duration of time limits, the procedures for the revocation of a decision or for cancellation of an entry in the Register, the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings, and the details on representation before the Office.
S obzirom na ključnu važnost iznosa pristojbi koje se plaćaju Uredu za funkcioniranje sustava žiga EU-a i njihove komplementarnosti u pogledu nacionalnih sustava žigova, potrebno je iznose pristojbi odrediti izravno u ovoj Uredbi u obliku priloga.
In order to ensure an effective and efficient organisation of the Boards of Appeal, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the organisation of the Boards of Appeal.
Visinu iznosa pristojbi trebalo bi utvrditi na razini koja osigurava da: prvo, prihodi od pristojbi u načelu budu dostatni za uravnoteženi proračun Ureda; drugo, žig EU-a i nacionalni sustavi žigova postoje koegzistiraju i nadopunjuju se, također uzimajući u obzir veličinu tržišta obuhvaćenog žigom EU-a i potrebe malih i srednjih poduzeća; i, treće, da se prava nositelja žiga EU-a učinkovito izvršavaju u državama članicama.