natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Quota of wholly milled or semi-milled rice covered by CN code 100630 as provided for in Article 1(1)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011
PRILOG
Origin
Količine koje se trebaju dodijeliti za podrazdoblje travnja 2017. i količine raspoložive za sljedeće podrazdoblje u skladu s Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 1273/2011
Order number
Kvota za bijelu ili polubijelu rižu obuhvaćenu oznakom KN 100630 iz članka 1. stavka 1. točke (a) Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1273/2011:
Allocation coefficient for the April 2017 subperiod
Podrijetlo
Total quantity available for the July 2017 subperiod (kg)
Redni broj
United States
Koeficijent dodjele za podrazdoblje travnja 2017.
Thailand
Ukupna količina raspoloživa za podrazdoblje srpnja 2017. (u kg)
Australia
Sjedinjene Američke Države
Other origins
Tajland
Applications cover quantities less than or equal to the quantities available: all applications are therefore acceptable.
Australija
Council Regulation (EU) 2017/762
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2017/762
amending Regulation (EU) No 479/2013 on the waiver from the requirement to submit entry and exit summary declarations for Union goods that are moved across the Neum corridor
o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 479/2013 o izuzimanju od obveze podnošenja ulaznih i izlaznih skraćenih deklaracija za robu Unije koja se prevozi preko neumskog koridora
Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia, and in particular Article 43 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Akt o pristupanju Hrvatske, a posebno njegov članak 43.,
Point (a) of Article 4 of Council Regulation (EU) No 479/2013 [1] provides for a waiver from the requirement to submit entry and exit summary declarations for Union goods that are moved across the Neum corridor, where the consignments of Union goods have a total value not exceeding EUR 10000 and where the Union goods are accompanied by invoices or transport documents fulfilling the conditions in point (b) of that Article (‘the waiver’).
Člankom 4. točkom (a) Uredbe Vijeća (EU) br. 479/2013 [1] predviđa se oslobođenje od zahtjeva za podnošenje ulazne i izlazne skraćene deklaracije za robu Unije koja se prevozi preko neumskog koridora ako ukupna vrijednost pošiljke robe Unije ne premašuje 10000 EUR i ako robu Unije prate računi ili prijevozne isprave koji ispunjavaju uvjete iz točke (b) tog članka („oslobođenje”).
The threshold of EUR 10000 was established by reference to the threshold of an equivalent value which was laid down in Article 317(4) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 [2].
Prag od 10000 EUR utvrđen je upućivanjem na prag jednake vrijednosti koji je bio utvrđen u članku 317. stavku 4.
Following the entry into force of the Union Customs Code in Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], Article 317(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 has been replaced by Article 126(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 [4], which provides for a threshold of EUR 15000.
Uredbe Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93 [2].
In order to ensure the uniform application of the Union customs legislation, it is therefore appropriate to align the scope of the waiver to that threshold.
Slijedom stupanja na snagu Carinskog zakonika Unije u Uredbi (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3], članak 317. stavak 4.
For reasons of legal certainty and legal clarity, certain references in Regulation (EU) No 479/2013 should be updated.
Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2454/93 zamijenjen je člankom 126. stavkom 1.
It is therefore appropriate to amend Regulation (EU) No 479/2013 accordingly,
Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2446 [4] koji predviđa prag od 15000 EUR.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Radi osiguranja jedinstvene primjene carinskog zakonodavstva Unije, primjereno je uskladiti opseg oslobođenja s tim pragom.
Article 1
Radi pravne sigurnosti i pravne jasnoće, određena upućivanja iz Uredbe (EU) br. 479/2013 trebalo bi ažurirati.
Regulation (EU) No 479/2013 is amended as follows:
Stoga je primjereno na odgovarajući način izmijeniti Uredbu (EU) br. 479/2013,
in Article 2, point (1) is replaced by the following:
DONIJELO JE OVU UREDBU:
“Union goods” means “Union goods” as defined in point (23) of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Članak 1.
Article 4 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EU) br. 479/2013 mijenja se kako slijedi:
in point (a), the figure ‘EUR 10000’ is replaced by the figure ‘EUR 15000’;
u članku 2. točka (1) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
point (b)(i) is replaced by the following:
‚roba Unije’ znači ‚roba Unije’ kako je definirana u članku 5. točki 23.
include at least the particulars referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 126(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446;
Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća;
Article 2
2. članak 4. mijenja se kako slijedi:
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
u točki (a) iznos „10000 eura” zamjenjuje se iznosom „15000 EUR”:
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
u točki (b) podtočka i. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Done at Luxembourg, 25 April 2017.
uključuju barem podatke iz članka 126. stavka 2. prvog podstavka Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2446;
Council Regulation (EU) No 479/2013 of 13 May 2013 on the waiver from the requirement to submit entry and exit summary declarations for Union goods that are moved across the Neum corridor (OJ L 139, 25.5.2013, p. 1).
Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1).
Sastavljeno u Luxembourgu 25. travnja 2017.
Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).
Za Vijeće
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 1).
Predsjednik
Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).’;
Uredba Vijeća (EU) br. 479/2013 od 13. svibnja 2013. o izuzimanju od obveze podnošenja ulaznih i izlaznih skraćenih deklaracija za robu Unije koja se prevozi preko neumskog koridora (SL L 139, 25.5.2013., str. 1.).
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske zajednice [1] („Osnovna uredba”), a posebno njezin članak 9. stavak 4.,
Provisional Measures
1.1.
On 16 November 2016 the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of certain lightweight thermal paper (‘LWTP’) originating in the Republic of Korea (‘the country concerned’) by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2005 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’).
Privremene mjere
The investigation was initiated on 18 February 2016 [3] following a complaint lodged on 4 January 2016 by the European Thermal Paper Association (‘ETPA’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of certain LWTP.
Europska komisija („Komisija”) uvela je 16. studenoga 2016.
As stated in recital (14) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2016/2005 [2] („Privremena uredba”) privremenu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz određenog laganog termalnog papira („LWTP”) podrijetlom iz Republike Koreje („predmetna zemlja”) u Uniju.
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Ispitni postupak pokrenut je 18. veljače 2016.
Subsequent procedure
[3] nakon pritužbe koju je 4. siječnja 2016. podnijelo Europsko udruženje za termalni papir („ETPA” ili „podnositelj pritužbe”) u ime proizvođača koji predstavljaju više od 25 % ukupne proizvodnje određenog laganog termalnog papira u Uniji.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (the provisional disclosure), three interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 14.
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Privremene uredbe, ispitnim postupkom o dampingu i šteti obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2015. do 31. prosinca 2015. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka”).
Both the Hansol Group and ETPA requested the intervention by the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings (‘the Hearing Officer’).
Ispitivanjem kretanja važnih za procjenu štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2012. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka („razmatrano razdoblje”).
During the hearings held on 13 December 2016 and 2 March 2017, the Hansol Group came back on issues discussed in the hearing of 10 March 2016 (i.e. on the exemption from replying to the questionnaire requested for a number of related converters) and contested the methodology used for dumping and injury calculations.
Daljnji postupak
In the hearing of 22 March 2017, the Hansol Group referred to some dumping calculations issues and proposed a change in the form of the measures.
Nakon objave bitnih činjenica i razmatranja na temelju kojih je uvedena privremena antidampinška pristojba („privremena objava”), tri zainteresirane strane dostavile su pisane podneske u kojima su iznijele stavove o privremenim nalazima.
In the hearing of 24 January 2017, ETPA expressed concern about some confidentiality issues and contested the Hansol Group's claims regarding the product scope and the level of support to measures.
Stranama koje su to zatražile omogućeno je da budu saslušane.
After the imposition of the provisional measures, the Commission continued seeking and verifying all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Društvo Hansol Group i ETPA zatražili su intervenciju službenika za saslušanje u trgovinskim postupcima („službenik za saslušanje”).
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of LWTP originating in the Republic of Korea (the definitive disclosure).
Tijekom saslušanja održanih 13. prosinca 2016. i 2. ožujka 2017. društvo Hansol Group osvrnulo se na probleme o kojima se raspravljalo na saslušanju od 10. ožujka 2016. (tj. izuzeće od odgovaranja na upitnik za određeni broj povezanih prerađivača) te je osporavalo metodologiju za izračun dampinga i štete.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the definitive disclosure.
Tijekom saslušanja održanog 22. ožujka 2017. društvo Hansol Group uputilo je na neka pitanja u pogledu izračuna dampinga i predložilo promjenu oblika mjera.
After definitive disclosure, further changes were made to the dumping and injury calculations for which all parties were informed and granted a period within which they could make comments (the additional final disclosure).
Tijekom saslušanja 24. siječnja 2017.
Subsequently, all parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the change of the form of the measures.
ETPA je izrazila zabrinutost u pogledu nekih pitanja povjerljivosti te je osporavala tvrdnje društva Hansol Group u pogledu opsega proizvoda i razine potpore mjerama.
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera Komisija je nastavila tražiti i provjeravati sve podatke koje je smatrala potrebnima za svoje konačne nalaze.
Product concerned and like product
Komisija je obavijestila sve strane o važnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih je namjeravala uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz LWTP-a podrijetlom iz Republike Koreje u Uniju („konačna objava”).
Product concerned
Svim je stranama dano razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle iznijeti primjedbe na konačnu objavu.
As set out in recital (15) of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is lightweight thermal paper weighing 65 g/m2 or less; in rolls of a width of 20 cm or more, a weight of the roll (including the paper) of 50 kg or more and a diameter of the roll (including the paper) of 40 cm or more (‘jumbo rolls’); with or without a base coat on one or both sides; coated with a thermo-sensitive substance (that is a mixture of dye and a developer that react and form an image when heat is applied) on one or both sides; and with or without a top coat, originating in the Republic of Korea, currently falling within CN codes ex48099000, ex48119000, ex48169000 and ex48239085.
Nakon konačne objave napravljene su daljnje izmjene u izračunu dampinga i štete o kojima su sve strane obaviještene te je svim stranama dano razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle iznijeti primjedbe (dodatna konačna objava).
Claims on the product scope
Nakon toga svim je stranama dano razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle iznijeti primjedbe na promjenu oblika mjera.
The Hansol Group reiterated its request for excluding phenol-free LWTP from the product scope on the grounds that the Commission failed to carry out an appropriate assessment of a series of factors.
Primjedbe koje su dostavile zainteresirane strane razmotrene su i uzete u obzir kada je to bilo primjereno.
According to the Hansol Group, phenol-free and other types of LWTP have different chemical composition, production processes and consumer perception.
Predmetni proizvod i istovjetni proizvod
In terms of chemical composition, the party stated that phenol-containing LWTP and phenol-free LWTP have a very different chemical composition on the grounds that they are treated differently in the EU market from a regulatory point of view, depending on the developer used in their production.
Predmetni proizvod
It should however be noted that only bisphenol A (‘BPA’), i.e. one of the numerous possible phenol-containing developers, was recently banned in the Union with effect in 2020, and that there is no separate legal treatment for all other phenol-containing developers.
Kako je utvrđeno u uvodnoj izjavi 15.
The alleged more strict regulatory treatment of two bisphenol-containing developers does not demonstrate that all bisphenols and phenolic substances used as developers are different from other colour developers.
Privremene uredbe, predmetni je proizvod lagani termalni papir težine 65 g/m2 ili manje; u svitcima širine 20 cm ili više, težine svitka (uključujući papir) 50 kg ili više i promjera svitka (uključujući papir) 40 cm ili više („veliki svitci”); s temeljnim premazom ili bez njega, na jednoj strani ili na obje strane; premazan toplinski osjetljivom tvari (tj. mješavinom bojila i razvijača koja reagira i stvara sliku prilikom primjene topline) na jednoj strani ili na obje strane; te s premazom na gornjoj strani ili bez njega, podrijetlom iz Republike Koreje, trenutačno obuhvaćen oznakama KN ex48099000, ex48119000, ex48169000 i ex48239085.
It is further noted that, although of key importance, the developer is just one of the numerous types of chemicals required to produce LWTP.
Tvrdnje u pogledu opsega proizvoda
In addition, nothing on file supports the allegation that LWTP containing BPA had already been banned in some Member States.
Društvo Hansol Group ponovilo je svoj zahtjev za isključenjem LWTP-a bez fenola iz opsega proizvoda na temelju činjenice da Komisija nije provela odgovarajuću procjenu niza čimbenika.
Therefore, it is concluded, from a material point of view, that phenol-containing LWTP and phenol-free LWTP do not have a different chemical composition.
Prema tvrdnjama društva Hansol Group, LWTP bez fenola i druge vrste LWTP-a imaju različit kemijski sastav, proizvodne postupke i percepciju potrošača.
The claim is therefore rejected.
U pogledu kemijskog sastava strana je navela da LWTP koji sadržava fenol i LWTP bez fenola imaju vrlo različit kemijski sastav na temelju činjenice da se s regulatornog stajališta s njima različito postupa na tržištu EU-a, ovisno o razvijaču koji se upotrebljava u njihovoj proizvodnji.
As regards production processes, the party claimed that it is not possible to produce phenol-free and BPA-free LWTP on the same production line.
Međutim potrebno je napomenuti da je samo bisfenol A („BPA”), tj. jedan od brojnih razvijača koji sadržava fenol, nedavno zabranjen u Uniji s učinkom od 2020. te da ne postoji zasebni pravni tretman za sve ostale razvijače koji sadržavaju fenol.
The investigation however showed that, technically, it is possible to produce phenol-free LWTP and phenol-containing LWTP on the same production line, albeit in different batches, and that Union producers do so.
Navodnim strožim regulatornim tretmanom dvaju razvijača koji sadržavaju bisfenol ne dokazuje se da se svi bisfenoli i fenolne tvari koje se upotrebljavaju kao razvijači razlikuju od ostalih razvijača boja.
As to consumer perception, the party alleged that consumers are aware of the presence of bisphenol in LWTP.
Dalje se naglašava da je razvijač, iako od ključne važnosti, samo jedna od brojnih vrsta kemikalija potrebnih za proizvodnju LWTP-a.
Furthermore the Hansol group claimed that an American LWTP producer started producing phenol-free LWTP in response to customer demand and that a supermarket chain in the Union expressed concerns about the type of developer used in LWTP.
Osim toga, u dokumentaciji ne postoji ništa čime bi se poduprla tvrdnja da je LWTP koji sadržava BPA već zabranjen u nekim državama članicama.
However, while there may be different consumer preferences, in general all product types are interchangeable from a demand side point of view (without any changes being made by end-users) and compete between each other.
Stoga se s materijalne točke gledišta zaključuje da LWTP koji sadržava fenol i LWTP bez fenola nemaju različit kemijski sastav.
The Hansol group also alleged that there is limited availability of Pergafast 201 (a phenol-free dye developer) and a significant price difference between phenol-free and phenol-containing LWTP in light of the purchase prices of two companies in the Union related to the Hansol Group.
Tvrdnja je stoga odbijena.
Given the existence of many types of developers, the alleged limited availability of only one specific type, i.e. the Pergafast 201 (that, in any case, the Hansol Group does not seem to have used), is irrelevant, because there are other alternative sources.
U pogledu proizvodnih postupaka strana je tvrdila da LWTP bez fenola i bez BPA-a nije moguće proizvesti na istoj proizvodnoj liniji.
For instance, in 2015 the European Chemical Agency's Committees, namely the Committee for Risk Assessment (‘RAC’) and the Committee for Socioeconomic Analysis (‘SEAC’), considered that then there were some 10 realistic alternatives to bisphenol A in thermal paper plus novel promising alternatives [4].
Ispitni je postupak, međutim, pokazao da je u tehničkom smislu moguće na istoj proizvodnoj liniji proizvesti LWTP bez fenola i LWTP koji sadržava fenol, iako u različitim serijama, te da to proizvođači iz Unije i čine.
The suppliers of chemical developers are expected to be ready for the ban on BPA mentioned in recital (10) and for the expiry of the patent on Pergafast 201 by 2019.
U pogledu percepcije potrošača strana je navela da su potrošači svjesni prisutnosti bisfenola u LWTP-u.
As to the alleged price difference, it is common that the product covered by an anti-dumping investigation includes various types with different price ranges.
Nadalje, društvo Hansol Group tvrdilo je da je američki proizvođač LWTP-a započeo s proizvodnjom LWTP-a bez fenola kao odgovor na zahtjev kupaca te da je lanac veletrgovina u Uniji izrazio zabrinutost u pogledu vrste razvijača koji se upotrebljava u LWTP-u.
This price difference is however not sufficient in itself to consider the various types as different products for the purpose of defining a product subject to an anti-dumping investigation, as long as the various types share the same basic characteristics and compete with each other, which is the case here.
Međutim iako možda postoje različite sklonosti potrošača, sve su vrste proizvoda općenito međusobno zamjenjive sa stajališta potražnje (bez ikakvih promjena od strane krajnjih korisnika) te se međusobno natječu.
In any event, any element affecting prices is taken into consideration for the purpose of the price comparison.
Društvo Hansol Group isto je tako navelo da postoji ograničena dostupnost razvijača Pergafast 201 (razvijač boje bez fenola) te znatna razlika u cijeni između LWTP-a bez fenola i LWTP-a koji sadržava fenol s obzirom na kupovne cijene dvaju društava u Uniji povezanih s društvom Hansol Group.
The Hansol group reiterated that there is a significant price difference between phenol-free and phenol containing LWTP (according to the purchase prices of its converters in the Union), which would allegedly demonstrate that they are different products.
S obzirom na postojanje brojnih vrsta razvijača, navodna ograničena dostupnost samo jedne određene vrste, tj. razvijača Pergafast 201 (za koji se čini da ga ni u jednom slučaju društvo Hansol Group nije upotrebljavalo) nije bitna jer postoje alternativni izvori.
In this respect, the overall finding in recital (113) of the provisional Regulation that the unit sales prices of phenol-free LWTP dropped less than the unit sales prices of phenol-containing LWTP cannot be contradicted by the purchase prices of two companies in the Union related to the Hansol Group, which represent a small share of the Union consumption.
Primjerice, 2015. odbori Europske agencije za kemikalije, tj.
The Hansol group initially claimed that phenol-free LWTP should not be covered by the investigation on the grounds that phenol-free LWTP is neither produced nor exported from the Republic of Korea.
Odbor za procjenu rizika („RAC”) i Odbor za socioekonomsku analizu („SEAC”) smatrali su da uz nove obećavajuće alternative postoji otprilike 10 stvarnih alternativa bisfenolu A u termalnom papiru [4].
In this respect, the Hansol Group's webpages show that this party has bisphenol-free thermal paper and LWTP without BPA on offer.
Očekuje se da će dobavljači kemijskih razvijača biti spremni na zabranu BPA-a navedenu u uvodnoj izjavi 10. te na istek patenta za Pergafast 201 do 2019.
The Hansol Group also claimed that the Commission was incorrect in defining a too broad product scope, because it will hamper future technological developments.
U pogledu navodne razlike u cijeni uobičajeno je da proizvod obuhvaćen antidampinškim ispitnim postupkom uključuje različite vrste s različitim rasponima cijena.
In particular, the party alleged that the complainants' catalogues do not show LWTP weighing less than 44 g/m2, reiterating its claim mentioned in recital (20) of the provisional Regulation that such type of LWTP should be excluded.
Međutim ta razlika u cijeni nije sama po sebi dostatna kako bi se različite vrste smatrale različitim proizvodima za potrebe definiranja proizvoda koji je predmet antidampinškog ispitnog postupka, sve dok različite vrste dijele jednaka osnovna svojstva i međusobno se natječu, a što je ovdje slučaj.
The above claim was not supported by any evidence.
U svakom slučaju, za potrebe usporedbe cijena uzimaju se u obzir svi elementi koji utječu na cijene.