natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this context, the Court has established that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored.
U tim okolnostima Sud je ocijenio da je cilj postignut kada korisnik povrati iznose nezakonito dodijeljene potpore.
In line with the case-law, Article 16(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 stated that ‘where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary (…)’.
Naime, tim povratom korisnik gubi prednost koju je na tržištu imao u odnosu na svoje konkurente i ponovno se uspostavlja stanje koje je postojalo prije isplate potpore.
Therefore, since the measures in question were implemented in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU and are incompatible with the internal market, the aid must be recovered in order to restore the existing market situation before they were granted.
U skladu s tom sudskom praksom, u članku 16. stavku 1.
The recovery must cover the period from the moment the advantage was granted to the beneficiaries, i.e. from the moment the aid was made available to the beneficiaries until it was actually recovered.
Uredbe (EU) 2015/1589 propisano je da „[k]ada se u slučajevima nezakonite potpore donesu negativne odluke, Komisija donosi odluku kojom se od dotične države članice zahtijeva da poduzme sve potrebne mjere za povrat sredstava potpore od korisnika […]”.
The sums to be recovered must therefore attract interest until the moment they are actually recovered.
Prema tome, budući da su predmetne mjere provedene protivno članku 108. stavku 3.
By letter of 20 March 2017, Belgium informed the Commission of the withdrawal of the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 by Royal Decree of 15 March 2017.
UFEU-a i da su nespojive s unutarnjim tržištem, moraju biti predmet povrata sredstava kako bi se ponovno uspostavilo stanje na tržištu koje je postojalo prije njihove dodjele.
Furthermore, by letter of 16 May 2017, Belgium provided all the necessary evidence that Brussels Airlines, TUI Airlines Belgium and Thomas Cook Airlines Belgium had repaid, pursuant to the Royal Decree of 15 March 2017, the amounts of aid received and interest calculated from 22 September 2014, on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004, i.e. respectively EUR 16779819 of aid and EUR 543546,30 of interest, EUR 2143621 of aid and EUR 69438,01 of interest, and EUR 76560 and EUR 2480 of interest.
Dakle, iznosi koje valja povratiti trebaju stvarati kamate do trenutka stvarnog povrata potpore.
In this light, taking account of the reimbursement of the amounts of aid received and the corresponding interest, the Commission considers that the beneficiaries have lost the advantage they had enjoyed in the market in relation to their competitors, and that the competitive situation prior to the payment of the aid has been reinstated.
Nadalje, Belgija je dopisom od 16. svibnja 2017. isto tako dostavila sve elemente potrebne kako bi se dokazalo da su zračni prijevoznici Brussels Airlines, TUI Airlines Belgium i Thomas Cook Airlines Belgium u skladu s kraljevskim dekretom od 15. ožujka 2017. vratili primljene iznose potpore, zajedno s kamatama obračunatima od 22. rujna 2014., na temelju osnovice sastavljene u skladu s poglavljem V. Uredbe (EZ) br. 794/2004 i Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 271/2008 o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 794/2004, odnosno 16779819 EUR potpore i 543546,30 EUR kamata, 2143621 EUR potpore i 69438,01 EUR kamata i 76560 EUR potpore i 2480 EUR kamata.
In the light of the above, there is no reason to require Belgium to abolish the measure or recover the incompatible aid from the beneficiaries since it has already taken that action.
U pogledu tih elemenata, uzimajući u obzir povrat plaćenih iznosa potpore i odgovarajućih kamata, Komisija smatra da su korisnici izgubili prednost koju su uživali na tržištu u odnosu na konkurenciju i da je ponovno uspostavljeno stanje u pogledu tržišnog natjecanja koje je postojalo prije isplate potpore.
CONCLUSION
S obzirom na prethodno navedeno nema potrebe za time da se Belgiji naloži da provede ukidanje mjere i povrat nespojive potrebe od korisnika jer je već provela te radnje.
The Commission finds that Belgium has unlawfully implemented State aid for airlines satisfying the conditions set out in Article 2(1) of the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
ZAKLJUČAK
Since no grounds of compatibility can be identified for the scheme in question, it is found to be incompatible with the internal market.
Komisija utvrđuje da je Belgija nezakonito provela državnu potporu u korist zračnih prijevoznika koji su ispunjavali uvjete utvrđene člankom 2. točkom 1. kraljevskog dekreta od 7. siječnja 2014., protivno članku 108. stavku 3.
However, since Belgium has withdrawn the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 and recovered the aid and corresponding interest, the situation prevailing before the granting of the unlawful and incompatible State aid has been re-established.
UFEU-a.
There is therefore no need to order the repeal of the measure or the recovery of the aid in question.
Budući da ne postoji nikakav element spojivosti, zaključeno je da je program nespojiv s unutarnjim tržištem.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Međutim, budući da je Belgija povukla kraljevski dekret od 7. siječnja 2014. i provela povrat iznosa potpore i odgovarajućih kamata, ponovno je uspostavljeno stanje prisutno prije dodjele te nezakonite i nespojive državne potpore.
Article 1
Stoga nema potrebe za time da se naloži ukidanje mjere i povrat predmetne potpore,
The subsidy granted by the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 to certain airlines constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
DONIJELA JE OVU ODLUKU:
This State aid granted unlawfully by the Kingdom of Belgium, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is incompatible with the internal market.
Članak 1.
Article 2
Subvencija dodijeljena kraljevskim dekretom od 7. siječnja 2014. u korist određenih zračnih prijevoznika predstavlja državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
Done at Brussels, 18 July 2017.
Potpora iz stavka 1. koju je Kraljevina Belgija nezakonito provela protivno članku 108. stavku 3.
For the Commission
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije nespojiva je s unutarnjim tržištem.
OJ C 24, 23.1.2015, p. 10.
Ova je Odluka upućena Kraljevini Belgiji.
See footnote 1.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 18. srpnja 2017.
The figures in brackets represent the change in the number of passengers or movements compared with the previous year.
Za Komisiju
The Royal Decree of 27 May 2004 on the transformation of Brussels International Airport Company into a private limited-liability company and on airport facilities (Belgian Official Gazette of 24 June 2004, p. 51750).
Članica Komisije
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan.
SL C 24, 23.1.2015., str. 10.
MAp Airports via Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund I and Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund III.
Vidjeti bilješku na 1. stranici.
Special Law of 8 August 1980 on institutional reform (Belgian Official Gazette, 15 August 1980, p. 9434).
Brojke u zagradama predstavljaju promjenu u broju putnika ili letova u odnosu na prethodnu godinu.
Royal Decree of 21 June 2004 granting the operating licence for Brussels airport to the limited-liability company BIAC (Belgian Official Gazette, 15 July 2004, p. 55640).
Kraljevski dekret od 27. svibnja 2004. o preoblikovanju društva Brussels International Airport Company u privatnopravno dioničko društvo i o objektima zračnih luka (belgijski službeni list Moniteur belge od 24. lipnja 2004., str. 51750.).
Article 1(12) and Article 30(7) of the Royal Decree of 27 May 2004.
MAp Airports putem Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund I i Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund III.
Article 35(1) of the Royal Decree of 27 May 2004.
Posebni zakon od 8. kolovoza 1980. o institucionalnim reformama (Moniteur belge od 15. kolovoza 1980., str. 9434.).
Response of 12 March 2015 to Request for Information of 10 February 2015 (reply to question 5(b)).
Kraljevski dekret od 21. lipnja 2004. o dodjeli operativne licencije za zračnu luku Bruxelles-National dioničkom društvu B.I.A.C.
Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 granting a subsidy to Brussels Airport Company, holder of the operating licence for Brussels airport, to support security-related infrastructure (Belgian Official Gazette, 23 April 2014, p. 34506).
(Moniteur belge od 15. srpnja 2004., str. 55640.).
In this context, the term ‘users of Brussels airport’ means the airlines operating flights departing from that airport.
Članak 1. točka 12. i članak 30. točka 7. kraljevskog dekreta od 27. svibnja 2004.
Response of 12 March 2015 to the request for information of 10 February 2015.
Članak 35. stavak 1. kraljevskog dekreta od 27. svibnja 2004.
Royal Decree of 15 March 2017 repealing the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 granting a subsidy to Brussels Airport Company, holder of the operating licence for Brussels airport, to support security-related infrastructure (Belgian Official Gazette of 24 March 2017).
Odgovor od 12. ožujka 2015. na zahtjev za informacijama od 10. veljače 2015. (odgovor na pitanje 5.b).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Kraljevski dekret od 7. siječnja 2014. o dodjeli subvencije društvu Brussels Airport Company, nositelju operativne licencije za zračnu luku Bruxelles National, za potporu objektima povezanima sa sigurnošću (Moniteur belge, 23. travnja 2014., str. 34506.).
Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2014 (published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1)) (OJ C 2, 7.1.2014, p. 7).
U ovom kontekstu izraz „korisnici zračne luke Bruxelles-National” znači zračni prijevoznici koji polijeću iz te zračne luke.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3).
Odgovor od 12. ožujka 2015. na zahtjev za informacijama od 10. veljače 2015.
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
Kraljevski dekret od 15. ožujka 2017. o stavljanju izvan snage Kraljevskog dekreta od 7. siječnja 2014. dodjeli subvencije društvu Brussels Airport Company, nositelju operativne licencije za zračnu luku Bruxelles National, za potporu objektima povezanima sa sigurnošću (Moniteur belge, 24. ožujka 2017.).
Point 145 of the aviation guidelines.
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 794/2004 od 21. travnja 2004. o provedbi Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za primjenu članka 108.
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2069 of 1 October 2014 concerning measures SA.14093 (C76/2002) implemented by Belgium in favour of Brussels South Charleroi Airport and Ryanair (OJ L 325, 30.11.2016, p. 63).
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 140, 30.4.2004., str. 1.).
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Obavijest Komisije o aktualnim državnim potporama oporavak referentnih kamatnih stopa i/diskontna stopa za 28 država članica primjenjuje od 1. siječnja 2014.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9).
(Objavljeno u skladu s člankom 10.
OJ L 325, 30.11.2016, p. 63.
Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 794/2004 od 21. travnja 2004.
Belgian Official Gazette of 31 December 2001.
(SL L 140, 30.4.2004., str. 1.))
In particular Article 158(1), (2) and (4) thereof.
(SL C 2, 7.1.2014., str. 7.).
Convention on International Civil Aviation, Chicago, 7 December 1944, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol.
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 800/2008 od 6. kolovoza 2008. o ocjenjivanju određenih kategorija potpora spojivima sa zajedničkim tržištem u primjeni članaka 87. i 88.
15, No 102, Article 15.
Ugovora (Uredba o općem skupnom izuzeću) (SL L 214, 9.8.2008., str. 3.).
Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on airport charges (OJ L 70, 14.3.2009, p. 11).
Komunikacija Komisije – Smjernice o državnim potporama zračnim lukama i zračnim prijevoznicima (SL C 99, 4.4.2014., str. 3.).
See, for example, the judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 January 2006, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze C-222/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:8, paragraph 129.
Točka 145.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 June 1998, Commission v Italy, C-35/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, paragraph 36; judgment of 23 April 1991, Höfner and Elser, C-41/90, ECLI:CU:C:1991:161, paragraph 21; judgment of 16 November 1995, Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances v Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, C-244/94, ECLI:EU:C:1995:392, paragraph 14, and judgment of 11 December 1997, Job Centre, C-55/96, ECLI:EU:C:1997:603, paragraph 21.
Smjernica o zrakoplovstvu.
Judgments of the Court of Justice of 16 June 1987, Commission v Italy, C-118/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, paragraph 7, and of 18 June 1998, Commission v Italy, C-35/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, paragraph 36.
Odluka Komisije (EU) 2016/2069 od 1. listopada 2014. o mjerama SA.14093 (C 76/2002) koje je poduzela Belgija u korist društava Brussels South Charleroi Airport i Ryanair (SL L 325, 30.11.2016., str. 63.).
See, for instance Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 July 2008, Essent Netwerk Noord, C-206/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, paragraphs 58-74.
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 659/1999 od 22. ožujka 1999. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za primjenu članka 108. ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 83, 27.3.1999., str. 1.).
See, inter alia, judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 February 1990, France v Commission, C-301/87, ECLI: EU: C: 1990: 67, paragraph 41.
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 od 13. srpnja 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 July 1974, Italy v Commission, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71 paragraph 27.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 248, 24.9.2015., str. 9.).
The term ‘State intervention’ refers not only to positive actions by the State but also covers cases where the authorities do not take measures in certain circumstances, for example to enforce debts.
SL L 325, 30.11.2016., str. 63.
See, for example, Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 October 2000, Magefesa, C-480/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:559, paragraphs 19 and 20.
Moniteur belge od 31. prosinca 2001.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 July 1974, Italy v Commission, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71 paragraph 13.
Osobito njegov članak 158. stavak 1. točke 2. i 4.
Commission Decision 2004/339/EC of 15 October 2003 on the measures implemented by Italy for RAI SpA (OJ L 119, 23.4.2004, p. 1), recital 69; opinion of Advocate General Fennelly of 26 November 1998, France v Commission, C-251/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:572, paragraph 26.
Konvencija o međunarodnom civilnom zrakoplovstvu, Chicago, 7. prosinca 1944., Ujedinjeni narodi, Zbornik ugovora, svezak 15., br. 102, članak 15.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003, Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87-93.
Direktiva 2009/12/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. ožujka 2009. o naknadama zračnih luka (SL L 70, 14.3.2009., str. 11.).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 December 2016, Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck, C-524/14 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:971.
Vidjeti, na primjer, presudu Suda od 10. siječnja 2006., Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze protiv Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, C-222/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:8, točku 129.
Judgment in Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck, cited in footnote 36, paragraph 62.
Vidjeti presude Suda Europske unije od 18. lipnja 1998., Komisija/Italija, C-35/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, t.
Belgium's arguments in this regard were essentially put forward in its answer of 2 April 2014 to the request for information of 11 February 2014, in its comments on the opening decision and in its reply of 12 March 2015 to the request for information of 10 February 2015.
36.; presudu od 23. travnja 1991., Höfner and Elser, C-41/90, ECLI:CU:C:1991:161, t.
Comments from Belgium on the opening decision (letter of 15 January 2015).
21.; presudu od 16. studenoga 1995., Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances protiv Ministarstva poljoprivrede i ribarstva, C-244/94, ECLI:EU:C:1995:392, t.
Annex 2 to the response of 2 April 2014 to the request for information of 11 February 2014.
14. i presudu od 11. prosinca 1997., Job Centre, C-55/96, ECLI:EU:C:1997:603, t.
Response of 2 April 2014 to question 14 of the request for information of 11 February 2014.
21.
See the third recital of the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014, which sets out this objective.
Vidjeti presudu Suda Europske unije od 16. lipnja 1987., Komisija protiv Italije, C-118/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, t.
Belgium's response of 12 March 2015 to question 2 of the Commission's request for information of 10 February 2015.
7., i presudu od 18. lipnja 1998., Komisija protiv Italije, C-35/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, t.
Response of 2 April 2014 to the request for information of 11 February 2014 and response of 12 March 2015 to the request for information of 10 February 2015.
36.
Response of 14 March 2015 to the request for information of 10 February 2015.
Vidjeti, na primjer, presudu Suda od 17. srpnja 2008., Essent Netwerk Noord, C-206/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, točke 58. do 74.
Judgment of the Court of 30 April 1998, Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission, T-214/95, ECLI:EU:T:1998:77, paragraphs 46 and 49-53.
Vidjeti, među ostalim, presudu Suda od 14. veljače 1990., Francuska protiv Komisije, C-301/87, ECLI:EU:C:1990:67, točka 41.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 January 2015, Eventech v The Parking Adjudicator, C-518/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:9, paragraph 65; judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 May 2013, Libert and others, Joined Cases C-197/11 and C-203/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:288, paragraph 76.
Presuda Suda od 2. srpnja 1974., Italija protiv Komisije, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, točka 27.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 January 2015, Eventech v The Parking Adjudicator, C-518/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:9, paragraph 66; judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 May 2013, Libert and others, Joined Cases C-197/11 and C-203/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:288, paragraph 77; judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2001, Friulia Venezia Giulia, T-288/97, ECLI:EU:T:2001:115, paragraph 41.
Termin „državne intervencije” ne odnosi se samo na pozitivne akcije države, nego obuhvaća i činjenicu da tijela vlasti u nekim okolnostima ne poduzimaju mjere, na primjer za naplatu dugova.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
Vidjeti, na primjer, presudu Suda od 12. listopada 2000., Magefesa, C-480/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:559, točke 19. i 20.
Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3).
Presuda Suda od 2. srpnja 1974., Italija protiv Komisije, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, točka 13.
OJ C 312, 9.12.2005, p. 1.
Odluka Komisije 2004/339/EZ od 15. listopada 2003. o mjerama koje je Italija provela za društvo RAI SpA (SL L 119, 23.4.2004., str. 1.), uvodna izjava 69.; Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika Fennellyja od 26. studenoga 1998., Francuska protiv Komisije, C-251/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:572, točka 26.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 82, 25.3.2008, p. 1).
Presuda Suda Europske unije od 24. srpnja 2003., Trans GmbH i Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg protiv Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, točke 87. do 93.
Belgium responded on 12 March 2015.
Presuda Suda Europske unije od 21. prosinca 2016., Komisija protiv Hansestadt Lübeck, C-524/14 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:971.
Belgium provided additional information by letters of 20 March and 16 May 2017.
Presuda Suda Europske unije od 21. prosinca 2016., Komisija protiv Hansestadt Lübeck, C-524/14 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:971, točka 62.
Pursuant to Article 55(1) of the Royal Decree of 21 June 2004, in the absence of notification of a substantiated disagreement of an airport user with BAC's tariff proposal, there is a tacit agreement between the parties on the tariff system and the rate control formula.
Argumenti Belgije u ovom pogledu u biti su navedeni u njezinu odgovoru od 2. travnja 2014. na zahtjev za informacijama od 11. veljače 2014., u njezinim primjedbama o odluci o pokretanju postupka i u njezinu odgovoru od 12. ožujka 2015. na zahtjev za informacijama od 10. veljače 2015.
If at least two unrelated airlines, each representing at least 1 % of annual movements or 1 % of annual passengers, and representing together at least 25 % of annual movements or 25 % of passengers over the last calendar year preceding the consultation of airport users, refuse the tariff control formula or the tariff system, they may lodge a reasoned appeal with the economic regulatory authority.
Primjedbe Belgije o Odluci o pokretanju postupka (Dopis od 15. siječnja 2015.).
Article 4 of the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 stipulates that this budget measure will be assessed in the course of 2015 so that it can be adjusted before the start of the new 2016-2021 tariff period.
Prilog 2. odgovoru od 2. travnja 2014. na zahtjev za informacijama od 11. veljače 2014.
The tariff period referred to in this provision corresponds to the five-year tariff schedule period for airport charges at Brussels airport, as provided for in Article 43 of the Royal Decree of 21 June 2004.
Odgovor od 2. travnja 2014. na 14. pitanje zahtjeva za informacijama od 11. veljače 2014.
The amount of the security charge payable by each airline, month by month, for each passenger carried, over and above the first 400000 passengers carried since 1 January 2013 was then calculated.
Vidjeti treću uvodnu izjavu kraljevskog dekreta od 7. siječnja 2014. u kojoj je utvrđen taj cilj.
This amount corresponds to the subsidy that would be due to the airline pursuant to the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014 in the absence of a budget ceiling.
Odgovor Belgije od 12. ožujka 2015. na 2. pitanje iz zahtjeva Komisije za informacijama od 10. veljače 2015.
Following the opening of the formal investigation procedure, Belgium decided, as a precautionary measure and without prejudice to its position on the preliminary assessment made by the Commission in the opening decision, to suspend from 3 December 2014 the implementation of the Royal Decree of 7 January 2014.
Odgovor od 2. travnja 2014. na zahtjev za informacijama od 11. veljače 2014. i odgovor od 12. ožujka 2015. na zahtjev za informacijama od 10. veljače 2015.