natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Case C-337/09 P, Council v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, EU:C:2012:471, paragraph 90: ‘In that regard, it must be noted that MET may only be granted to an operator if the costs to which it is subject and the prices it charges are the result of the free operation of supply and demand. That would not be the case if, for example, the State interfered directly with the price of certain raw materials or the price of labour.’
Predmet C-337/09 P, Vijeće protiv Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, EU:C:2012:471, točka 90.: „S obzirom na to, mora se napomenuti da se tretman tržišnoga gospodarstva subjektu može odobriti samo ako su troškovi koje snosi i cijene koje naplaćuje posljedica slobodnog funkcioniranja ponude i potražnje. To ne bi bio slučaj ako bi, na primjer, država izravno utjecala na cijenu određenih sirovina ili cijenu rada.”
See case T-394/13 Photo USA Electronic Graphic vs. Council ECLI:EU:T:2014:964.
Vidjeti predmet T-394/13 Photo USA Electronic Graphic protiv Vijeća ECLI:EU:T:2014:964.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/140 of 29 January 2018 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain cast iron articles originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the investigation on imports of certain cast iron articles originating in India, OJ L 25, 30.1.2018, p. 6.
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/140 оd 29. siječnja 2018. o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz određenih proizvoda od lijevanog željeza podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i o prekidu ispitnog postupka u vezi s uvozom određenih proizvoda od lijevanog željeza podrijetlom iz Indije, SL L 25, 30.1.2018., str. 6.
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam, OJ L 275, 6.10.2006, p. 1.
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1472/2006 od 5. listopada 2006. o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz određene obuće s gornjištima od kože podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Vijetnama, SL L 275, 6.10.2006., str. 1.
The company has not submitted company specific information to calculate an individual dumping margin.
To trgovačko društvo nije dostavilo informacije o sebi potrebne za izračun pojedinačne dampinške marže.
OJ L 16, 18.1.2019, p. 98.
SL L 16, 18.1.2019., str. 98.
Zhejiang Xingyue Vehicle Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Xingyue Overfly Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Xingyue Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Xingyue Vehicle Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Xingyue Overfly Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Xingyue Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd.
As to the claim that the Commission should have instead used the data from the two unrelated importers, the Commission would note the following points.
U pogledu tvrdnje da je umjesto toga trebala koristiti podatke dvaju nepovezanih uvoznika, Komisija navodi sljedeće točke.
The Commission notes that using the Union industry's data as the source for such an adjustment has been done before, in the proceeding concerning certain cast iron articles originating in the PRC, but the Commission has also used unrelated importers's data, as in the proceeding concerning certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the PRC and Vietnam.
Napominje da su i prije kao izvor za takvu prilagodbu korišteni podaci industrije Unije, i to u postupku u vezi s određenim proizvodima od lijevanog željeza podrijetlom iz NRK-a, ali da je koristila i podatke nepovezanih uvoznika, primjerice u postupku u vezi s određenom obućom s gornjištem od kože podrijetlom iz NRK-a i Vijetnama.
They further submitted that Union producers had increased their capacity from 2014 and 2016.
Nadalje, tvrdili su da su proizvođači iz Unije povećali svoj kapacitet u razdoblju od 2014. i 2016.
These interested parties claimed that it was only possible because the Union industry did not face competition until 2016 as would have been acknowledged in their complaint.
Te su zainteresirane strane tvrdile da je to bilo moguće samo zato što industrija Unije nije bila suočena s konkurencijom do 2016., kako je potvrđeno u njihovoj pritužbi.
Most of this increase occurred between 2014 and 2016.
Do tog je povećanja najviše došlo u razdoblju od 2014. do 2016.
Employment increased by 1 percentage point between 2016 and the investigation period.
Zaposlenost se povećala za 1 postotni bod od 2016. do razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
Finally, the Commission disagreed with the CCCME's claim that the low profit margin of the Union Industry in 2014 could only be its commercial fault since the complainant had admitted that imports from the PRC did not start to grow and become competitive until 2016.
Naposljetku, Komisija se nije složila s CCCME-ovom tvrdnjom da niska profitna marža industrije Unije 2014. može biti samo njezina komercijalna krivnja s obzirom na to da je podnositelj pritužbe priznao da se uvoz iz NRK-a počeo povećavati te je postao konkurentan tek od 2016.
The Commission assessed that that claim was based on an inaccurate reading of the complaint and, in any case, that it was contradicted by the investigation's findings which showed that imports from the PRC had a significant market share of 18 % in 2014 and had already doubled in volume by 2016.
Komisija je ocijenila da se ta tvrdnja temeljila na netočnom tumačenju pritužbe i da je u svakom slučaju u suprotnosti s nalazima ispitnog postupka koji je pokazao da je uvoz iz NRK-a imao znatan tržišni udio od 18 % 2014. te da se njegov obujam udvostručio do 2016.
The Commission observed that this survey took place in May 2018.
Komisija je napomenula da je ta anketa provedena u svibnju 2018.
At the time, the information available in the complaint and in the registration Regulation indicated a potential duty of 189 %.
U to su vrijeme informacije koje su bile dostupne u pritužbi i uredbi o evidentiranju upućivale na potencijalnu pristojbu od l189 %.
The CEIEB further claimed that its survey did not confirm that the majority of importers would continue its business despite the imposition of duties and referred to the information submitted during the hearing held on 5 October 2018.
CEIEB je nadalje tvrdio da njegova anketa nije potvrdila da će većina uvoznika nastaviti s poslovanjem unatoč uvođenju pristojbi te je uputio na informacije koje su dostavljene tijekom saslušanja održanog 5. listopada 2018.
The CEIEB also submitted that it never provided any evidence that the majority of them had successfully found alternative supply chains without any negative impact on their businesses.
Osim toga, CEIEB je tvrdio da anketom nije pružen dokaz da je većina uvoznika uspješno pronašla druge izvore opskrbe bez negativnog utjecaja na svoje poslovanje.
It submitted that the target profit should not be the average profit from the Union industry but the average profit from the companies not injured by Chinese imports in 2015.
Tvrdio je da ciljna dobit ne bi trebala biti prosječna dobit industrije Unije, već prosječna dobit društava koja nisu pretrpjela štetu zbog kineskog uvoza 2015.
The complainant argued since the target profit is the reasonable profit that the Union producers could achieve in the absence of injury caused by dumped/subsidised imports, the Commission could not by definition take as reference point the profitability of Union producers already materially injured by dumped/subsidised imports.
Podnositelj pritužbe tvrdio je da, budući da je ciljna dobit razumna dobit koju su proizvođači iz Unije mogli ostvariti da nije došlo do štete zbog dampinškog/subvencioniranog uvoza, Komisija po definiciji kao referentnu točku ne bi mogla uzeti profitabilnost proizvođača iz Unije koji su već pretrpjeli materijalnu štetu zbog dampinškog/subvencioniranog uvoza.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/88
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2019/88
of 18 January 2019
od 18. siječnja 2019.
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for acetamiprid in certain products
o izmjeni Priloga II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu maksimalnih razina ostataka za acetamiprid u određenim proizvodima
For acetamiprid, maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za acetamiprid utvrđene su u Prilogu II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
In the context of a procedure for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance acetamiprid on table olives and olives for oil production, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRLs.
U kontekstu postupka odobrenja uporabe sredstva za zaštitu bilja koje sadržava aktivnu tvar acetamiprid na stolnoj maslini i maslinama za proizvodnju ulja podnesen je zahtjev za izmjenu postojećih MRO-a u skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005.
Such an application was also submitted for the use of acetamiprid on barley and oats.
Takav je zahtjev podnesen i za uporabu acetamiprida na ječmu i zobi.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) assessed the applications and the evaluation reports, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and, where relevant, to animals and gave a reasoned opinion on the proposed MRLs.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”) ocijenila je zahtjeve i izvješća o ocjeni, posebno ispitavši rizike za potrošače i, prema potrebi, za životinje te je dala obrazloženo mišljenje o predloženim MRO-ima.
The Authority forwarded that opinion to the applicant, the Commission and the Member States and made it available to the public.
Agencija je to mišljenje dostavila podnositelju zahtjeva, Komisiji i državama članicama te ga je učinila dostupnim javnosti.
The Authority concluded in its reasoned opinion that all requirements with respect to data were met and that the modifications to the MRLs requested by the applicant were acceptable with regard to consumer safety on the basis of a consumer exposure assessment for 27 specific European consumer groups.
Agencija je u svojem obrazloženom mišljenju zaključila da su svi uvjeti u pogledu podataka ispunjeni i da su izmjene MRO-a koje je zatražio podnositelj zahtjeva prihvatljive u odnosu na sigurnost potrošača na temelju ocjene izloženosti potrošača za 27 specifičnih europskih potrošačkih skupina.
The Authority took into account the most recent information on the toxicological properties of the substance.
Agencija je uzela u obzir najnovije informacije o toksikološkim svojstvima tvari.
Neither the lifetime exposure to this substance via consumption of all food products that may contain it, nor the short-term exposure due to high consumption of the relevant products showed that there is a risk that the acceptable daily intake or the acute reference dose is exceeded.
Opasnost od prekoračenja prihvatljivog dnevnog unosa ili akutne referentne doze nije utvrđena ni pri izlaganju toj tvari tijekom cijelog životnog vijeka konzumiranjem svih prehrambenih proizvoda koji je mogu sadržavati ni pri kratkoročnom izlaganju zbog znatnog konzumiranja predmetnih proizvoda.
In the context of the procedure for the renewal of the approval of the active substance acetamiprid in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Authority submitted a conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment concerning that active substance, where new toxicological endpoints were proposed.
U kontekstu postupka produljenja odobrenja aktivne tvari acetamiprid u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, Agencija je dostavila zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od uporabe te aktivne tvari kao pesticida , u kojem su predloženi novi toksikološki parametri.
These endpoints were agreed by the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed on 13 December 2017.
Te je parametre potvrdio Stalni odbor za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje 13. prosinca 2017.
In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the Commission requested the Authority to assess the risks the current MRLs for acetamiprid may pose to consumers in the light of the resulting lower acute reference dose (ARfD).
U skladu s člankom 43. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 Komisija je od Agencije zatražila da ocijeni rizike za potrošače koje bi mogli uzrokovati postojeći MRO-i za acetamiprid s obzirom na utvrđenu nižu akutnu referentnu dozu.
The Authority identified in its reasoned opinion consumer intake concerns for apples, pears, peaches, head cabbages, Chinese cabbages, kales, lettuces, escaroles, spinaches, purslanes, chards and celeries.
Agencija je u svojem obrazloženom mišljenju utvrdila da postoje zabrinutosti povezane s konzumacijom za jabuku, krušku, breskvu, glavati kupus, pekinški kupus, kelj, salatu, širokolisnu endiviju, špinat, tušt, blitvu i celer.
Member States were consulted to report potential fall-back Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) that would not lead to an unacceptable risk for consumers.
Države članice zamoljene su da predlože moguće zamjenske dobre poljoprivredne prakse čijom primjenom ne bi došlo do neprihvatljiva rizika za potrošače.
Member States identified fall-back GAPs for all concerned products except for Chinese cabbages, kales and celeries, for which the MRLs should be set at the relevant limit of determination.
Države članice pronašle su zamjenske dobre poljoprivredne prakse za sve predmetne proizvode osim za pekinški kupus, kelj i celer, za koje bi MRO-e trebalo utvrditi na relevantnoj granici određivanja.
As regards escaroles, the Authority concluded that some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required.
U pogledu širokolisne endivije Agencija je zaključila da određene informacije nisu dostupne i da je potrebno da osobe koje upravljaju rizikom izvrše daljnje razmatranje.
As there is no risk for consumers in relation to the fall-back GAP, the MRL for that product should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the level identified by the Authority.
Budući da nema rizika za potrošače u pogledu dobre poljoprivredne prakse za slučaj nužde, MRO za taj proizvod trebalo bi utvrditi u Prilogu II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 na razini koju odredi Agencija.
This MRL will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.
Taj će se MRO preispitati, a pri preispitivanju će se u obzir uzeti informacije koje budu dostupne unutar dvije godine od objave ove Uredbe.
It shall apply from 13 August 2019.
Primjenjuje se od 13. kolovoza 2019.
However, for acetamiprid in olives for oil production, table olives, barley and oats, it shall apply from 13 February 2019.
Međutim, za acetamiprid u maslinama za proizvodnju ulja, stolnoj maslini, ječmu i zobi primjenjuje se od 13. veljače 2019.
Done at Brussels, 18 January 2019.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 18. siječnja 2019.
EFSA scientific reports available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu:Reasoned opinion on the focussed assessment of certain existing MRLs of concern for acetamiprid and modification of the existing MRLs for table olives, olives for oil production, barley and oats.
Znanstvena izvješća EFSA-e dostupna su na internetu: http://www.efsa.europa.eu: Reasoned opinion on the focussed assessment of certain existing MRLs of concern for acetamiprid and modification of the existing MRLs for table olives, olives for oil production, barley and oats („Obrazloženo mišljenje o ciljanoj procjeni određenih zabrinjavajućih postojećih MRO-a za acetamiprid i o izmjeni postojećih MRO-a za stolnu maslinu, masline za proizvodnju ulja, ječam i zob”).
EFSA Journal 2018;16(5):5262.
EFSA Journal 2018.;16(5):5262.
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1).
Uredba (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. listopada 2009. o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja i stavljanju izvan snage direktiva Vijeća 79/117/EEZ i 91/414/EEZ (SL L 309, 24.11.2009., str. 1.). [3] Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance acetamiprid („Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od uporabe aktivne tvari acetamiprid kao pesticida”).
Review report for the active substance acetamiprid (SANTE/10502/2017 Rev. 4).
Izvješće o pregledu za aktivnu tvar acetamiprid (SANTE/10502/2017 Rev. 4).
Reasoned opinion on the focussed assessment of certain existing MRLs of concern for acetamiprid and modification of the existing MRLs for table olives, olives for oil production, barley and oats.
Reasoned opinion on the focussed assessment of certain existing MRLs of concern for acetamiprid and modification of the existing MRLs for table olives, olives for oil production, barley and oats („Obrazloženo mišljenje o ciljanoj procjeni određenih zabrinjavajućih postojećih MRO-a za acetamiprid i o izmjeni postojećih MRO-a za stolnu maslinu, masline za proizvodnju ulja, ječam i zob”).
In Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the column for acetamiprid is replaced by the following:
U Prilogu II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 stupac koji se odnosi na acetamiprid zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 24 January 2021, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
Pri preispitivanju MRO-a Komisija će uzeti u obzir informacije iz prve rečenice ako budu dostavljene do 24 siječnja 2021. ili nedostatak informacija ako ne budu dostavljene do tog datuma.
Escaroles/broad-leaved endives’
Širokolisna endivija”
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance acetamiprid. EFSA Journal 2016;14(11):4610.
EFSA Journal 2016.;14(11):4610.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/89
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2019/89
of 18 January 2019
оd 18. siječnja 2019.
amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for bromadiolone, etofenprox, paclobutrazol and penconazole in or on certain products
o izmjeni priloga II., III. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu maksimalnih razina ostataka za bromadiolon, etofenproks, paklobutrazol i penkonazol u ili na određenim proizvodima
For etofenprox and paclobutrazol maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za etofenproks i paklobutrazol utvrđene su u dijelu A Priloga III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
For penconazole, MRLs were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
MRO-i za penkonazol utvrđeni su u Prilogu II. i dijelu B Priloga III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
For bromadiolone no MRLs are set in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, and as this active substance is not included in Annex IV to that Regulation, the default value of 0,01 mg/kg laid down in Article 18(1)(b) of that Regulation applies.
U Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 nisu utvrđeni MRO-i za bromadiolon, a s obzirom na to da ta aktivna tvar nije uvrštena u Prilog IV. toj uredbi, primjenjuje se zadana vrijednost od 0,01 mg/kg utvrđena u članku 18. stavku 1. točki (b) te uredbe.
For bromadiolone, the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”) za bromadiolon dostavila je obrazloženo mišljenje o postojećim MRO-ima u skladu s člankom 12. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 u vezi s njezinim člankom 12. stavkom 1.
All existing authorisations for plant protection products containing bromadiolone are restricted to the use as rodenticide only and are not intended for direct application on edible crops.
Sva su postojeća odobrenja za sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju bromadiolon ograničena na uporabu isključivo kao rodenticid i nisu namijenjena za izravnu primjenu na jestivim kulturama.
It is therefore appropriate to set the MRLs at the default limit of determination.
Stoga je primjereno MRO-e utvrditi na zadanoj granici određivanja.
These default values should be set in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in accordance with Article 18(1)(b) of that Regulation.
Te bi zadane vrijednosti trebalo utvrditi u Prilogu V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 u skladu s člankom 18. stavkom 1. točkom (b) te uredbe.
For etofenprox, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof.
Agencija je za etofenproks dostavila obrazloženo mišljenje o postojećim MRO-ima u skladu s člankom 12. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 u vezi s njezinim člankom 12. stavkom 1.
The Authority recommended lowering the MRLs for chestnuts, hazelnuts/cobnuts, apples, pears, apricots, cherries (sweet), plums, grapes, strawberries, blackberries, raspberries (red and yellow), blueberries, currants (black, red and white), gooseberries (green, red and yellow), figs, kaki/Japanese persimmons, granate apples/pomegranates, potatoes, garlic, onions, tomatoes, sweet peppers/bell peppers, aubergines/eggplants, Brussel sprouts, head cabbages, beans (with pods), beans (without pods), lupins/lupine beans (dry), cereals, sugar beet roots, swine (muscle, liver and kidney), bovine (muscle, liver and kidney), sheep (muscle, liver and kidney), goat (muscle, liver and kidney), equine (muscle, liver and kidney), other farmed terrestrial animals (muscle, liver and kidney) and milk (sheep and goat).
Agencija je preporučila da se snize MRO-i za kestene, lješnjake, jabuku, krušku, marelicu, trešnju (slatku), šljivu, grožđe, jagode, kupine, maline (crvene i žute), borovnice, ribize (bijele, crne i crvene), ogrozd (crveni, zeleni i žuti), smokvu, kaki/japansku jabuku, nar/šipak, krumpir, češnjak, crveni luk, rajčicu, papriku, patlidžan, kelj pupčar, glavati kupus, grah (s mahunama), grah (bez mahuna), lupine (suhe), žitarice, korijen šećerne repe, svinje (mišić, jetra i bubreg), goveda (mišić, jetra i bubreg), ovce (mišić, jetra i bubreg), koze (mišić, jetra i bubreg), konje (mišić, jetra i bubreg), ostale kopnene životinje iz uzgoja (mišić, jetra i bubreg) i mlijeko (ovčje i kozje).
For other products, it recommended raising or keeping the existing MRLs.
Za ostale proizvode preporučila je da se povise ili zadrže postojeći MRO-i.