natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission found no indication that an increase in sales which was that much lower than the increase in consumption could be considered a strong performance, and indeed not be indicative of material injury.
Komisija nije utvrdila ništa što bi upućivalo na to da bi se povećanje prodaje koje je bilo toliko niže od povećanja potrošnje moglo smatrati dobrim poslovnim rezultatom i ne upućivati na materijalnu štetu.
The CCCME also claimed that, according to information in the complaint, the Union producers supporting the complaint only suffered a minor decrease in market share of 2 percentage points during the period considered.
CCCME je tvrdio i da su, prema podacima u pritužbi, proizvođači iz Unije koji su podržali pritužbu tijekom razmatranog razdoblja pretrpjeli tek manje smanjenje tržišnog udjela od 2 postotna boda.
That small decrease would allegedly confirm that the complainants have not suffered material injury from imports of the product concerned.
To malo smanjenje navodno potvrđuje da podnositelji pritužbe nisu pretrpjeli materijalnu štetu zbog uvoza predmetnog proizvoda.
Pursuant to Article 3(1) of the basic Regulation the term injury is defined as ‘material injury to the Union industry’.
U skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe pojam šteta definira se kao „materijalna šteta industriji Unije”.
Thus, the Commission is required to assess injury to the Union industry as a whole, not only to the complainants.
Stoga Komisija treba procijeniti štetu za industriju Unije u cjelini, a ne samo za podnositelje pritužbe.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to sales volume and market share and further to the correction made in recital (113), the Commission confirms all other conclusions set out in recitals (173) to (176) of the provisional Regulation.
Budući da nije bilo nikakvih drugih primjedbi u pogledu obujma prodaje i tržišnog udjela te nakon ispravka iz uvodne izjave 113., Komisija potvrđuje sve ostale zaključke utvrđene u uvodnim izjavama od 173. do 176. privremene uredbe.
In the absence of comments, the Commission confirmed its conclusions set out in recital (177) of the provisional Regulation.
Budući da nije bilo nikakvih primjedbi, Komisija je potvrdila svoje zaključke utvrđene u uvodnoj izjavi 177. privremene uredbe.
Following the exclusion of certain companies from the definition of the Union industry as outlined in recitals (80) to (83), the figures for employment and productivity of the Union industry were revised.
Nakon isključivanja određenih društava iz definicije industrije Unije, kako je opisano u uvodnim izjavama od 80. do 83., revidirani su podaci za zaposlenost i produktivnost industrije Unije.
The Union industry thus increased the level of employment by 40 % over the period considered.
Stoga se razina zaposlenosti u industriji Unije u razmatranom razdoblju povećala za 40 %.
The trends described in the provisional Regulation remain the same for employment and productivity after the revision.
Kretanja za zaposlenost i produktivnost opisana u privremenoj uredbi nakon revizije ostala su ista.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to employment and productivity and further to the correction made in recital (121), the Commission confirmed all other conclusions set out in recitals (178) to (180) of the provisional Regulation.
Budući da nije bilo nikakvih drugih primjedbi u pogledu zaposlenosti i produktivnosti te nakon ispravka iz uvodne izjave 121., Komisija je potvrdila sve ostale zaključke utvrđene u uvodnim izjavama od 178. do 180. privremene uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to the magnitude of the dumping and the recovery from past dumping, the Commission confirmed its conclusions set out in recital (181) and (182) of the provisional Regulation.
Budući da nije bilo nikakvih drugih primjedbi u pogledu visine dampinga i oporavka od prethodnog dampinga, Komisija je potvrdila svoje zaključke utvrđene u uvodnim izjavama 181. i 182. privremene uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the CEIEB, the CCCME and four other exporting producers submitted that the increase of 15 % in the average prices of the Union industry contradicted the Commission's findings that Chinese imports caused price suppression or depression to the Union industry's ability to increase its prices.
Nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera CEIEB, CCCME i četiri druga proizvođača izvoznika naveli su da je povećanje prosječnih cijena industrije Unije od 15 % u suprotnosti s Komisijinim nalazom o tome da je kineski uvoz uzrokovao pritisak na cijene ili smanjio sposobnost industrije Unije da poveća svoje cijene.
First, the Commission observes that the reference year to measure this increase was 2014, when the Union industry recorded a very low level of profitability and its lowest profit margin over the period considered.
Prvo, Komisija je uočila da je referentna godina za mjerenje tog povećanja bila 2014., kada je industrija Unije zabilježila vrlo nisku razinu profitabilnosti i najmanju profitnu maržu u razmatranom razdoblju.
Third, as stated in recital (185) of the provisional Regulation, such evolution does not necessarily mean that the cost and price of a comparable product increased in the same way as the average cost and price since the product range changes every season.
Treće, kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 185. privremene uredbe, takav razvoj ne znači nužno da su se trošak i cijena usporedivog proizvoda povećali na isti način kao i prosječni trošak i cijena jer se asortiman proizvoda mijenja svake sezone.
Considering these elements and the findings concerning undercutting, the Commission therefore disagrees with the claim that the increase in the average price of the products sold by the Union industry invalidates the existence of price suppression or depression.
Uzimajući u obzir te elemente i nalaze u pogledu sniženja cijena, Komisija se stoga ne slaže s tvrdnjom da povećanje prosječne cijene proizvoda koje je prodala industrija Unije poništava postojanje pritiska na cijene ili sprečavanja povećanja cijena.
Therefore, the Commission confirmed its conclusions set out in recital (186) and (187) of the provisional Regulation.
Stoga je Komisija potvrdila svoje zaključke utvrđene u uvodnim izjavama 186. i 187. privremene uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the CEIEB claimed that the Commission could not, at the same time, define the end of the selling season in mid-July when assessing the conditions for registration and at the end of September when assessing the significance of inventories in its injury analysis.
Nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera CEIEB je tvrdio da Komisija u svojoj analizi štete nije mogla istovremeno utvrditi kraj prodajne sezone sredinom srpnja pri ocjeni uvjeta za evidentiranje i krajem rujna pri ocjeni značaja zaliha.
It further submitted that the increase in inventory between 2016 and the investigation period was insignificant.
Nadalje, tvrdio je da povećanje zaliha u razdoblju od 2016. do razdoblja ispitnog postupka nije bilo značajno.
The Commission considered that the selling season lasted from March to September.
Komisija je smatrala da prodajna sezona traje od ožujka do rujna.
In the registration Regulation, the Commission considered that it was reasonable to assume that a further substantial rise in imports was likely to undermine the remedial effect of the duty given that the deadline for imposing provisional measures was 20 July.
Komisija je u Uredbi o evidentiranju smatrala da je razumno pretpostaviti da će dodatno znatno povećanje uvoza vjerojatno ugroziti korektivni učinak pristojbi s obzirom na to da je rok za uvođenje privremenih mjera bio 20. srpnja.
Indeed, in this context, it meant that an increase in stocks levels would allow importers to supply the product concerned until the end of the selling season.
Zaista, u tom je kontekstu to značilo da bi povećanje razina zaliha uvoznicima omogućilo da opskrbljuju tržište predmetnim proizvodom do kraja prodajne sezone.
In the provisional Regulation, based on the same seasonal patterns, the Commission observed that the fact that stocks stood in September of the investigation period at a higher level than in December a year before reflected a continued and significant increase in stocks since stocks levels should normally be low at the end of the selling season.
Komisija je u privremenoj uredbi, na temelju istih sezonskih kretanja, primijetila da činjenica da su zalihe u rujnu u razdoblju ispitnog postupka bile na višoj razini nego u prosincu prethodne godine odražava stalno i znatno povećanje zaliha jer bi razine zaliha na kraju prodajne sezone obično trebale biti niske.
The Commission assessed that there was no contradiction between those two analyses and confirmed the findings outlined in recitals (188) to (191) of the provisional Regulation.
Komisija je ocijenila da te dvije analize nisu u suprotnosti i potvrdila je svoje nalaze opisane u uvodnim izjavama od 188. do 191. privremene uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the CEIEB submitted that the profit margin of the Union industry declined by only 0,4 % between 2016 and the IP when the pace of growth of Chinese imports accelerated which would show that there was no injury.
Nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera CEIEB je tvrdio da se profitna marža industrije Unije u razdoblju od 2016. do RIP-a, kada se ubrzao rast kineskog uvoza, smanjila za samo 0,4 %, što bi ukazivalo na to da nema štete.
In the same vein, the CCCME and four exporting producers claimed that the level of the profit margin of the Union industry during the IP and its evolution over the period considered did not characterize a situation of material injury.
Slično tomu, CCCME i četiri proizvođača izvoznika tvrdili su da razina profitne marže industrije Unije tijekom RIP-a i njezino kretanje tijekom razmatranog razdoblja nisu bili karakteristični za materijalnu štetu.
Whilst the investigation established the existence of a significant volume of imports at dumped and undercutting prices, it also established the strength in demand in the electric bicycle market which somewhat limited the negative effects on the profit margin of the Union Industry.
Iako je ispitnim postupkom utvrđeno postojanje znatnog obujma uvoza po dampinškim i sniženim cijenama, utvrđena je i velika potražnja na tržištu električnih bicikala koja je u određenoj mjeri ograničila negativne učinke na profitnu maržu industrije Unije.
This observation includes the period between 2016 and the IP, pointed out by the CEIEB, where the sharp increase in imports from the PRC coincided with a relatively small decline in sales of the Union industry due to the continued strength in consumption.
Ovo opažanje uključuje razdoblje od 2016. do RIP-a, koje je istaknuo CEIEB, kada se naglo povećanje uvoza iz NRK-a podudaralo s relativno malim smanjenjem prodaje industrije Unije zbog kontinuirano velike potrošnje.
Nevertheless, the Commission observed that the profit margin of the Union industry declined in all years but one and was overall at depressed levels.
Ipak, Komisija je primijetila da se profitna marža industrije Unije smanjila u svim godinama osim jedne te je sveukupno bila na niskim razinama.
Furthermore, the conclusion of material injury is not based on a single indicator.
Nadalje, zaključak o materijalnoj šteti ne temelji se samo na jednom pokazatelju.
Other indicators, of which some of financial nature such as cash flow, were analysed together with the evolution of the profit margin to conclude to a situation of material injury.
Kako bi se donio zaključak o materijalnoj šteti, zajedno s kretanjem profitne marže analizirani su i drugi pokazatelji od kojih su neki bili financijske prirode, kao što je novčani tok.
The claim had therefore to be rejected.
Stoga se tvrdnja morala odbaciti.
The CCCME further submitted that that the most likely explanation of the decline in profit margin between 2015 and the investigation period was not due to the pressure from Chinese imports but the Union industry's investments to increase its production capacity.
CCCME je nadalje tvrdio da su najvjerojatniji razlog smanjenja profitne marže u razdoblju od 2015. do razdoblja ispitnog postupka ulaganja industrije Unije u povećanje svojeg proizvodnog kapaciteta, a ne pritisci zbog kineskog uvoza.
The CCCME claimed that that argument had not been considered by the Commission.
CCCME je tvrdio da Komisija nije uzela u obzir taj argument.
That comment was analysed in section 5.2.3 of the provisional Regulation, notably under recital (221) where the Commission explained that capital expenditure did not have a material impact on the profitability of the Union Industry.
Ta je primjedba analizirana u odjeljku 5.2.3. privremene uredbe, osobito u uvodnoj izjavi 221., u kojoj je Komisija objasnila da kapitalni rashodi nisu imali materijalni učinak na profitabilnost industrije Unije.
In the absence of additional information, the claim was therefore rejected.
Stoga je ta tvrdnja odbačena budući da nije bilo novih informacija.
Following final disclosure, the CEIEB assessed that the target profit margin of 4,3 % was not significantly higher than the profit margin during the investigation period of 3,4 % and submitted that the level of profitability of the Union's industry during the investigation period was not evidence of injury.
Nakon konačne objave, CEIEB je procijenio da ciljna profitna marža od 4,3 % nije znatno viša od profitne marže tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka koja je iznosila 3,4 % te je tvrdila da razina profitabilnosti industrije Unije tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka nije dokaz štete.
As stated in recital (198) of the provisional Regulation, the electric bicycle industry is a structurally cash-intensive business.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 198. privremene uredbe, industrija električnih bicikala u strukturnom je smislu gotovinski intenzivna djelatnost.
It is therefore important to see whether the profitability achieved can generate a sufficient cash-flow to sustain the operations of the Union industry.
Stoga je važno provjeriti može li ostvarena profitabilnost stvoriti novčani tok dovoljan za očuvanje poslovanja industrije Unije.
As demonstrated in Table 11 of the provisional Regulation, the cash flow of the Union industry was weak during the investigation period, accounting for a mere 0,6 % of sales turnover.
Kako je prikazano u tablici 11. privremene uredbe, novčani tok industrije Unije bio je slab tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka i činio je samo 0,6 % prodajnog prometa.
Therefore, when assessing the financial performance of the Union industry as a whole, and not looking at the profitability in isolation, the finding concerning the poor financial performance of the Union industry is maintained.
Stoga, pri ocjeni financijskih rezultata industrije Unije u cjelini, ne analizirajući profitabilnost izolirano, potvrđuje se nalaz u pogledu loših financijskih rezultata industrije Unije.
Following final disclosure, the CCCME noted that large investments and employment could entail substantially increased fixed costs for the Union producers and have a significant impact on profitability, especially if capacity utilisation was low.
CCCME je nakon konačne objave napomenuo da velika ulaganja i zaposlenost mogu dovesti do znatnog povećanja fiksnih troškova za proizvođače iz Unije i znatno utjecati na profitabilnost, posebno ako je iskorištenost kapaciteta niska.
As regards investments, as shown in recital (197) of the provisional Regulation, during the period considered investments represented no more than 2 % of sales.
U pogledu ulaganja, kako je prikazano u uvodnoj izjavi 197. privremene uredbe, tijekom razmatranog razdoblja ulaganja nisu činila više od 2 % prodaje.
The Commission considered therefore that the Union industry made no ‘large investments’ which could have had a significant impact on profitability during the period considered.
Komisija je stoga smatrala da industrija Unije nije provela „velika ulaganja” koja su mogla znatno utjecati na profitabilnost tijekom razmatranog razdoblja.
As regards employment, the CCCME argued that the huge capacity increase was closely reflected in a substantial employee growth.
U pogledu zaposlenosti CCCME je tvrdio da se veliko povećanje kapaciteta snažno odražava u znatnom rastu broja zaposlenih.
It is, however, also clear that the increase in employment was also driven by a significant increase in production.
Međutim, također je jasno da je povećanje zaposlenosti potaknuto i znatnim povećanjem proizvodnje.
The Commission found that, in particular between 2014 and 2016, the employment mirrored the production much more closely than the production capacity.
Komisija je utvrdila, posebno u razdoblju između 2014. i 2016., da je zaposlenost jače odražavala proizvodnju nego proizvodni kapacitet.
During the investigation period, where the Union sales and production developed negatively despite a growing Union consumption, the Union industry was not able to decrease employment, leading to a decreasing productivity per employee.
Tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka, kada su kretanja u prodaji i proizvodnji u Uniji bila negativna unatoč rastućoj potrošnji u Uniji, industrija Unije nije mogla smanjiti zaposlenost, što je dovelo do smanjenja produktivnosti po zaposleniku.
Such a decreasing productivity and the consequent negative impact on the profitability of the Union industry is however directly linked to the increasing quantities of dumped imports of Chinese electric bicycles during the period considered.
Međutim, tako smanjena produktivnost i njezin negativni učinak na profitabilnost industrije Unije izravno su povezani s povećanim količinama dampinškog uvoza kineskih električnih bicikala tijekom razmatranog razdoblja.
In the absence of any other comments on profitability, cash flow, investment, return on investments and ability to raise capital, the conclusion set out in recitals (192) to (199) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Budući da nije bilo nikakvih drugih primjedbi u pogledu profitabilnosti, novčanog toka, ulaganja, povrata ulaganja i sposobnosti prikupljanja kapitala, potvrđeni su zaključci utvrđeni u uvodnim izjavama od 192. do 199. privremene uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the CCCME and four Chinese exporting producers submitted that competition factors had not been addressed in the injury analysis.
Nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera CCCME i četiri kineska proizvođača izvoznika tvrdili su da se u analizi štete u obzir nisu uzeli čimbenici tržišnog natjecanja.
They claimed that the complaint admitted that imports from the PRC had not been a market issue until 2016, as long as they focused on the low and mid-level segments of the Union market and that the injury analysis should have focused on these specific segments.
Tvrdili su da se u pritužbi priznaje da se uvoz iz NRK-a nije smatrao poteškoćom na tržištu do 2016., sve dok je bio usmjeren na niži i srednji cjenovni segment tržišta Unije te da je analiza štete trebala biti usmjerena na te specifične segmente.
One importer further claimed that injury, if proven, would essentially affect or focus on the low-end segment of electric bicycles and, based on its own experience, did not exist in the high-end segments of the market.
Jedan uvoznik nadalje je tvrdio da bi šteta, ako se dokaže, u osnovi utjecala ili bila usmjerena na segment električnih bicikala niže klase te da na temelju njegova iskustva šteta ne postoji u segmentima tržišta visoke klase.
Notwithstanding the fact that the CCCME's claims were made on an inaccurate reading of the complaint, the Commission recalls that its conclusions were not based on the complaint but on its own investigation and findings concerning dumping, injury and causality.
Unatoč činjenici da su se tvrdnje CCCME-a temeljile na pogrešnom tumačenju pritužbe, Komisija podsjeća da se njezini zaključci nisu temeljili na pritužbi, već na vlastitom ispitivanju i nalazima u pogledu dampinga, štete i uzročnosti.
As established in recital (249) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation has shown that the Union industry is active in all market segments.
Kako je utvrđeno u uvodnoj izjavi 249. privremene uredbe, ispitnim postupkom utvrđeno je da je industrija Unije aktivna u svim segmentima tržišta.
Such differentiation of the product concerned was therefore not warranted and the claim had to be rejected.
Takvo razlikovanje predmetnog proizvoda stoga nije bilo opravdano i tvrdnja se morala odbaciti.
Following final disclosure, the CCCME argued that the Commission had not described in the provisional Regulation how it characterised the ‘entry-level products’ mentioned in recital (249) of the provisional Regulation.
CCCME je nakon konačne objave tvrdio da Komisija u privremenoj uredbi nije opisala kako je definirala„proizvode s najnižom cijenom” koji se spominju u uvodnoj izjavi 249. privremene uredbe.
It also claimed that the impact of any growth in imports from the PRC (also from third countries) in recent years must be assessed having regard to the specific market segments in which those imported electric bicycles were sold.
Tvrdio je i da se utjecaj svakog rasta uvoza iz NRK-a (i iz trećih zemalja) posljednjih godina mora ocijeniti uzimajući u obzir posebne tržišne segmente u kojima su ti uvezeni električni bicikli prodani.
In that respect, ‘entry-level products’ are those electric bicycles which have the basic characteristics in the PCN structure.
U tom su smislu „proizvodi s najnižom cijenom” električni bicikli koji imaju osnovna svojstva u strukturi PCN-a.
The definition of ‘entry-level products’ is different from the alleged differentiation of the market in segments.
Definicija „proizvoda s najnižom cijenom” razlikuje se od navodne diferencijacije tržišta prema segmentima.
As stated in recital (42), although several interested parties put forward similar claims concerning segmentation, no one provided evidence that would have justified or allowed for a possible segmentation of the market.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 42., iako je nekoliko zainteresiranih strana iznijelo slične tvrdnje u pogledu segmentacije, nijedna nije dostavila dokaze koji bi opravdali ili dopustili moguću segmentaciju tržišta.
In particular, no physical or other objective criteria were provided by any interested party, which would support an analysis based on a segmentation of the market, as described in recitals (45) and (46).
Konkretno, nijedna zainteresirana strana nije dostavila fizičke ili druge objektivne kriterije kojima bi se potkrijepila analiza na temelju segmentacije tržišta, kako je opisano u uvodnim izjavama 45. i 46.
The CCCME also argued that since the loss of market share of the Union industry mostly affected Union producers other than the complainants, as explained in recital (117), the imports from the PRC and the production of the complainants has allegedly been in largely distinct market segments.
CCCME je tvrdio i da su, s obzirom na to da je gubitak tržišnog udjela industrije Unije uglavnom utjecao na proizvođače iz Unije koji nisu podnositelji pritužbe, kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 117., uvoz iz NRK-a i proizvodnja podnositelja pritužbe navodno bili u bitno različitim tržišnim segmentima.
However, as already mentioned in recital (118), the injury analysis covers the Union industry as a whole, not only the complainants.
Međutim, kako je već navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 118., analizom štete obuhvaćena je industrija Unije u cjelini, a ne samo podnositelji pritužbe.
It is undisputed that the Union industry suffered a significant loss of market share of 24 percentage points, mainly to Chinese imports, which gained 17 percentage points of market share during the period considered.
Nesporno je da je industrija Unije pretrpjela znatan gubitak tržišnog udjela od 24 postotna boda, uglavnom zbog kineskog uvoza, koji je tijekom razmatranog razdoblja pridobio 17 postotnih bodova tržišnog udjela.
The CEIEB disagreed with the Commission's conclusion on injury.
CEIEB je izrazio neslaganje sa zaključkom Komisije o šteti.
It claimed that the Union industry had performed extremely well with the exception of retention of market share.
Tvrdio je da je industrija Unije ostvarila iznimno dobre rezultate, uz iznimku zadržavanja tržišnog udjela.