natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the required fee is not paid within the specified period, the Office shall inform the applicant that the application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been entered.
Ako potrebna pristojba nije plaćena u propisanom roku, Ured obavješćuje podnositelja zahtjeva da se smatra da zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti nije podnesen.
Where the application has been filed in a language which is not one of the languages of the Office as required under Article 146(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, or it does not comply with Article 12(1)(a) or (b) or, where applicable, Article 12(2)(a) or (b) of this Regulation, the Office shall reject the application as inadmissible.
Ako je zahtjev podnesen na jeziku koji nije jedan od jezika Ureda kako je propisano člankom 146. stavkom 5. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ili ako nije u skladu s člankom 12. stavkom 1. točkom (a) ili (b) i, prema potrebi, s člankom 12. stavkom 2. točkom (a) ili (b) ove Uredbe, Ured odbija zahtjev kao nedopušten.
Where the translation required under the second subparagraph of Article 146(7) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 is not filed within a period of one month of the date of filing an application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity, the Office shall reject the application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity as inadmissible.
Ako prijevod koji se zahtijeva u skladu s člankom 146. stavkom 7. drugim podstavkom Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 nije podnesen u roku od jednog mjeseca od datuma podnošenja zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti, Ured odbija zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti kao nedopušten.
The Office shall notify the applicant and the proprietor of the EU trade mark of any finding pursuant to paragraph 1 that the application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been entered and of any decision to reject the application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity on the grounds of inadmissibility under paragraphs 2, 3 or 4.
Ured obavješćuje podnositelja zahtjeva i nositelja žiga EU-a o zaključcima u skladu sa stavkom 1. da se smatra zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim nije podnesen i o odluci o odbijanju zahtjeva za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim zbog nedopuštenosti u skladu sa stavcima 2., 3. ili 4.
Where an application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity is rejected in its entirety as inadmissible pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 or 4, prior to the notification of Article 17(1), no decision on costs shall be taken.
Ako je zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavosti u cijelosti odbijen kao nedopušten u skladu sa stavkom 2., 3. ili 4 prije obavijesti iz članka 17. stavka 1., ne donosi se odluka o troškovima.
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 58(1)(b) or (c) or Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, facts, arguments and evidence to support the grounds on which the application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity is based;
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 58. stavkom 1. točkom (b) ili (c) ili člankom 59. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, činjenice, argumente i dokaze o osnovi na kojoj se temelji zahtjev za opoziv ili za proglašavanje ništavim;
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the evidence required by Article 7(2) of this Regulation and the provisions of Article 7(3) shall apply mutatis mutandis;
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 60. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, dokaze propisane člankom 7. stavkom 2. ove Uredbe, a odredbe članka 7. stavka 3. primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis;
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 60(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, evidence of acquisition, continued existence and scope of protection of the relevant earlier right as well as evidence proving that the applicant is entitled to file the application, including, where the earlier right is invoked pursuant to the law of a Member State, a clear identification of the content of the national law relied upon by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or jurisprudence.
u slučaju zahtjeva u skladu s člankom 60. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, dokaze o stjecanju, trajnom postojanju i opsegu zaštite mjerodavnog ranijeg prava te dokaze da podnositelj zahtjeva ima pravo podnijeti zahtjev uključujući, ako se poziva na ranije pravo u skladu s pravom države članice, jasno navođenje sadržaja nacionalnog zakona na kojem se temelji navođenjem objava relevantnih odredaba ili sudske prakse.
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of an earlier right under Article 60(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 or the evidence concerning the contents of the relevant national law is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the applicant may provide such evidence by making reference to that source.
Ako su dokazi o podnošenju prijave ili registraciji ranijeg prava iz članka 60. stavka 2. točke (d) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ili dokazi povezani sa sadržajem nacionalnog zakona dostupni na internetu iz izvora koji Ured priznaje, podnositelj zahtjeva može dostaviti te dokaze upućivanjem na taj izvor.
Evidence concerning the filing, registration or renewal of earlier rights or, where applicable, the content of the relevant national law, including evidence accessible online, as referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), shall be filed in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language.
Dokazi o podnošenju prijave, registraciji ili produljenju ranijih prava ili, ako je primjenjivo, sadržaju relevantnog nacionalnog zakona, uključujući dokaze dostupne na internetu, kako je navedeno u stavku 1. točkama (b) i (c), podnose se na jeziku postupka ili ih prati prijevod na taj jezik.
The translation shall be submitted by the applicant of the applicant's own motion within one month from the filing of such evidence.
Prijevod dostavlja podnositelj zahtjeva na vlastitu inicijativu u roku od mjesec dana od podnošenja takvih dokaza.
Where the Office has invited a party in accordance with Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 to file observations within a specified period and that party does not submit any observations within that period, the Office shall close the adversarial part of the proceedings and base its ruling on the revocation or invalidity on the basis of the evidence before it.
Ako je Ured pozvao stranku u skladu s člankom 64. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 da podnese primjedbe u određenom roku i ta stranka u tom roku ne podnese nikakve primjedbe, Ured zaključuje kontradiktorni dio postupka i svoju odluku o opozivu ili proglašavanju ništavim temelji na dokazima kojima raspolaže.
Where the proprietor surrenders the EU trade mark subject to an application as referred to in Article 12 to cover only goods or services against which the application is not directed, or the EU trade mark is revoked or declared invalid in parallel proceedings, or expires, the proceedings shall be closed except where Article 57(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall apply or the applicant shows a legitimate interest in obtaining a decision on the merits.
Ako se nositelj odrekne žiga EU-a na temelju zahtjeva iz članka 12. da njime budu obuhvaćeni samo proizvodi ili usluge na koje se zahtjev ne odnosi, ili ako žig EU-a bude opozvan ili proglašen ništavim u usporednom postupku ili istekne, postupak se okončava, osim ako se primjenjuje članak 57. stavak 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ili ako podnositelj zahtjeva pokaže zakoniti interes za odlučivanje o meritumu.
Article 8(9) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Članak 8. stavak 9. primjenjuje se mutatis mutandis.
Article 9(2), (3) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Članak 9. stavci 2., 3. i 4. primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis.
In the case of an application for revocation based on Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Office shall invite the proprietor of the EU trade mark to provide proof of genuine use of that mark or of proper reasons for non-use, within such period as it shall specify.
U slučaju zahtjeva za opoziv na temelju članka 58. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, Ured poziva nositelja žiga EU-a da u roku koji je on odredio dostavi dokaz o stvarnoj uporabi tog žiga ili opravdane razloge zašto se on ne upotrebljava.
Where the proprietor does not provide any evidence of genuine use or of reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient, the EU trade mark shall be revoked.
Ako nositelj žiga ne dostavi dokaz stvarne uporabe ili razloga za neuporabu prije isteka vremenskog roka ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi ili razlozi očito nerelevantni ili očito nedovoljni, žig EU-a opoziva se.
A request for proof of use pursuant to Article 64(2) or (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall be admissible if the proprietor of the EU trade mark submits it as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 17(1) of this Regulation.
Zahtjev za dokaz o uporabi u skladu s člankom 64. stavkom 2. ili 3. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 dopušten je ako ga je nositelj žiga EU-a dostavio kao bezuvjetni zahtjev u zasebnom dokumentu u roku koji je Ured odredio u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. ove Uredbe.
Where the proprietor of the EU trade mark has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark or of proper reasons for non-use which complies with the requirements of Article 64(2) or (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Office shall invite the applicant for a declaration of invalidity to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Ako je nositelj žiga EU-a zatražio dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga ili o opravdanim razlozima zašto se on ne upotrebljava koji je u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 64. stavka 2. ili 3. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, Ured poziva podnositelja zahtjeva za proglašavanje ništavim da dostavi potrebni dokaz u roku koji je odredio Ured.
Where the applicant for a declaration of invalidity does not provide any evidence of genuine use or of reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient, the Office shall reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Ako podnositelj zahtjeva za proglašenje ništavnosti ne dostavi dokaz stvarne uporabe ili razloge za neuporabu prije isteka roka ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi ili razlozi očito nerelevantni ili očito nedovoljni, Ured odbija zahtjev za proglašenje ništavnosti ako se on temelji na tom ranijem žigu.
Where the proprietor of a trade mark requests, in accordance with Article 21(1) and (2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, an assignment instead of a declaration of invalidity, the provisions of Articles 12 to 19 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Ako nositelj žiga umjesto proglašavanja ništavim zatraži prijenos, u skladu s člankom 21. stavcima 1. i 2. točkom (a) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, primjenjuju se mutatis mutandis odredbe iz članaka od 12. do 19. ove Uredbe.
Where a request for assignment pursuant to Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 is partially or totally granted by the Office or by an EU trade mark court and the decision or judgment has become final, the Office shall ensure that the resulting partial or total transfer of the EU trade mark is entered in the Register and published.
Ako je Ured ili sud za žig EU-a djelomično ili u cijelosti odobrio zahtjev za prijenos u skladu s člankom 21. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 i odluka ili presuda postane pravomoćna, Ured osigurava da se konačni djelomični ili potpuni prijenos žiga EU-a upisuje u registar i objavljuje.
Notice of appeal
Obavijest o žalbi
A notice of appeal filed in accordance with Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall contain the following:
Obavijest o žalbi podnesena u skladu s člankom 68. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 sadržava sljedeće:
the name and address of the appellant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
ime i adresu podnositelja žalbe u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
where the appellant has appointed a representative, the name and the business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
ako je podnositelj žalbe ovlastio zastupnika, ime i službenu adresu zastupnika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (e) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
where representation of the appellant is mandatory pursuant to Article 119(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the name and the business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
ako je zastupanje podnositelja žalbe obavezno u skladu s člankom 119. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, ime i poslovnu adresu zastupnika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (e) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
a clear and unambiguous identification of the decision subject to appeal indicating the date on which it was issued and the file number of the proceedings to which the decision subject to appeal relates;
jasno i nedvosmisleno navedenu odluku protiv koje se podnosi žalba s datumom kada je donesena i brojem spisa u postupku na koji se odnosi odluka protiv koje se podnosi žalba;
Where in ex parte proceedings the decision subject to appeal has been taken in an official language other than the language of proceedings, the appellant may file the notice of appeal either in the language of the proceedings or in the language in which the decision subject to appeal was taken; in either case, the language used for the notice of appeal shall become the language of the appeal proceedings and paragraph 2 shall not apply.
U svakom slučaju, jezik koji se upotrebljava za obavijest o žalbi postaje jezik žalbenog postupka i ne primjenjuje se stavak 2.
Statement of grounds
Obrazloženje žalbe
A statement setting out the grounds of appeal filed pursuant to the fourth sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall contain a clear and unambiguous identification of the following:
U obrazloženju žalbe podnesenom u skladu s člankom 68. stavkom 1. četvrtom rečenicom Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 jasno i nedvosmisleno se navodi sljedeće:
Where the statement of grounds is filed in another official language of the Union, the appellant shall provide a translation thereof within one month of the date of the submission of the original statement.
Ako je obrazloženje podneseno na drugom službenom jeziku Unije, podnositelj žalbe dostavlja prijevod obrazloženja u roku od mjesec dana od datuma podnošenja izvornog obrazloženja.
where the appeal does not comply with Articles 66 and 67 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, or with those laid down in Article 21(1)(d) and Article 21(2) and (3) of this Regulation, unless those deficiencies are remedied within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
ako žalba nije u skladu s člancima 66. i 67. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ili s onima iz članka 21. stavka 1. točke (d) i članka 21. stavaka 2. i 3. ove Uredbe, osim ako su ti nedostaci ispravljeni u roku od četiri mjeseca od datuma obavijesti o odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba;
where the statement of grounds does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article 22(1)(a) and (b), and the appellant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied those deficiencies within the time limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect or has not submitted the translation of the statement of grounds within one month of the date of the submission of the original statement in accordance with Article 22(2).
ako obrazloženje žalbe nije u skladu s uvjetima propisanima u članku 22. stavku 1. točkama (a) i (b) podnositelj žalbe, unatoč tome što ga je žalbeno vijeće obavijestilo, nije ispravio te nedostatke u roku koji je ono za to odredilo ili nije dostavio prijevod obrazloženja u roku od mjeseca dana od podnošenja izvornog obrazloženja u skladu s člankom 22. stavkom 2.
The Board of Appeal shall declare an appeal as deemed not to have been filed where the appeal fee has been paid after the expiry of the time limit set out in the first sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Žalbeno vijeće izjavljuje da se smatra da žalba nije podnesena ako je pristojba za podnošenje žalbe plaćena nakon isteka roka utvrđenog u članku 68. stavku 1. prvoj rečenici Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.
In exceptional circumstances, that time limit may be extended upon reasoned request by the defendant.
U iznimnim okolnostima taj se rok može produljiti na temelju obrazloženog zahtjeva branjenika.
The response shall contain the name and address of the defendant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626 and shall comply, mutatis mutandis, with the conditions laid down in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d), Article 22(1)(a) and (c) and Article 22(2) of this Regulation.
Odgovor sadržava ime i adresu branjenika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626 i u skladu je, mutatis mutandis, s uvjetima iz članka 21. stavka 1. točaka (b), (c) i (d), članka 22. stavka 1. točaka (a) i (c) i članka 22. stavka 2. ove Uredbe.
Where the defendant seeks a decision annulling or altering the contested decision on a point not raised in the appeal, pursuant to Article 68(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, that cross appeal shall be filed within the time limit for filing a response in accordance with Article 24(1) of this Regulation.
Ako branjenik traži donošenje odluke kojom se poništava ili izmjenjuje osporena odluka u točki koja nije navedena u žalbi, u skladu s člankom 68. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, ta se protužalba podnosi u roku za podnošenje odgovora u skladu s člankom 24. stavkom 1. ove Uredbe.
The cross appeal shall contain the name and address of the defendant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626 and shall comply mutatis mutandis with the conditions laid down in Article 21(1)(b) to (e) and Article 22 of this Regulation.
Protužalba sadržava ime i adresu branjenika u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 1. točkom (b) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626 i u skladu je, mutatis mutandis, s uvjetima iz članka 21. stavka 1. točaka od (b) do (e) i članka 22. ove Uredbe.
where it has not been filed within the time limit laid down in paragraph 1;
ako nije podnesena u roku propisanom u stavku 1.;
where it does not comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 3, and the defendant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied these deficiencies within the time limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect or has not submitted the translation of the cross appeal and the corresponding statement of grounds within one month of the date of submission of the original.
ako nije u skladu s uvjetima propisanima u stavku 3. i branjenik, unatoč tome što ga je žalbeno vijeće o tome obavijestilo, nije ispravio te nedostatke u roku koji je ono za to odredilo ili nije dostavio prijevod protužalbe i pripadajućeg obrazloženja u roku od mjeseca dana od podnošenja izvorne protužalbe.
In exceptional circumstances, that time limit may be extended by the Board of Appeal upon the reasoned request of the appellant.
U iznimnim slučajevima žalbeno vijeće može produljiti rok na temelju obrazloženog zahtjeva podnositelja žalbe.
Upon the appellant's reasoned request filed within two weeks of the notification of the response, the Board of Appeal may, pursuant to Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, authorise the appellant to supplement the statement of grounds with a reply within a period specified by the Board of Appeal.
Na temelju obrazloženog zahtjeva podnositelja žalbe koji je podnesen u roku od dva tjedna od obavijesti o odgovoru, žalbeno vijeće može, u skladu s člankom 70. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, ovlastiti podnositelja žalbe da replikom nadopuni obrazloženje u roku koji ono odredi.
In such a case, the Board of Appeal shall also authorise the defendant to supplement the response with a rejoinder within a period specified by the Board of Appeal.
U tom slučaju žalbeno vijeće može ovlastiti branjenika da odgovor nadopuni odgovorom na repliku u roku koji ono odredi.
In ex parte proceedings, and with respect to those goods or services which form part of the subject matter of the appeal, the Board of Appeal, in compliance with Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, shall proceed in accordance with Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 where it raises a ground for refusal of the trade mark application which had not already been invoked in the decision subject to appeal in application of that provision.
U postupku ex parte i u pogledu proizvoda ili usluga koje čine dio predmeta žalbe, žalbeno vijeće, u skladu s člankom 45. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, postupa u skladu s člankom 42. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 kada navodi osnovu za odbijanje prijave žiga na koju se nije već pozvalo u odluci protiv koje se podnosi žalba na temelju primjene te odredbe.
Matters of law not raised by the parties shall be examined by the Board of Appeal only where they concern essential procedural requirements or where it is necessary to resolve them in order to ensure a correct application of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 having regard to the facts, evidence and arguments presented by the parties.
Pravna pitanja koja stranke nisu navele žalbeno vijeće razmatra samo ako se odnose na bitne postupovne zahtjeve ili ako ih je nužno riješiti kako bi se osigurala ispravna primjena Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 uzimajući u obzir činjenice, dokaze i argumente koje su navele stranke.
The examination of the appeal shall include the following claims or requests provided that they have been raised in the statement of grounds of the appeal or, as the case may be, in the cross appeal and provided that they were raised in due time in the proceedings before the instance of the Office which adopted the decision subject to appeal:
Ispitivanje žalbe uključuje sljedeće tvrdnje ili zahtjeve, pod uvjetom da su navedene u obrazloženju žalbe ili, ovisno o slučaju, u protužalbi te pod uvjetom da su na vrijeme uvedene u postupak pred odjelom Ureda koji je donio odluku protiv koje se podnosi žalba:
distinctiveness acquired through use as referred to in Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;
razlikovni karakter stečen uporabom kako je navedeno u članku 7. stavku 3. i članku 59. stavku 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001;
recognition of the earlier trade mark on the market acquired through use for the purposes of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;
prepoznatljivost ranijeg žiga na tržištu stečenu uporabom za potrebe članka 8. stavka 1. točke (b) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001;
proof of use pursuant to Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 or Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
dokaz o uporabi u skladu s člankom 47. stavcima 2. i 3. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ili člankom 64. stavcima 2. i 3. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.
In accordance with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Board of Appeal may accept facts or evidence submitted for the first time before it only where those facts or evidence meet the following requirements:
U skladu s člankom 95. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, žalbeno vijeće može prihvatiti činjenice ili dokaze koji su prvi puta podneseni samo ako te činjenice i dokazi ispunjavaju sljedeće zahtjeve:
The Board of Appeal shall, at the latest in its decision on the appeal and, as the case may be, the cross appeal, decide on requests for restriction, division or partial surrender of the contested mark declared during the appeal proceedings by the applicant or the proprietor in accordance with Articles 49, 50 or 57 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Žalbeno vijeće, najkasnije u svojoj odluci o žalbi i, ovisno o slučaju, protužalbi, odlučuje o zahtjevima za ograničavanje, razdvajanje ili djelomično odricanje od osporenog žiga koje je podnositelj zahtjeva ili vlasnik dostavio tijekom žalbenog postupka u skladu s člankom 49., 50. ili 57. Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.