natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 24 May 2018, the Commission published Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/756 (‘the registration Regulation’) making imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina subject to registration as of 25 May 2018 onwards.
Komisija je 24. svibnja 2018. objavila Provedbenu uredbu (EU) 2018/756 („Uredba o evidentiranju”) o uvođenju obveze evidentiranja uvoza biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine od 25. svibnja 2018.
Responding to the request for registration, interested parties submitted comments that the Commission addressed in the registration Regulation.
Kao odgovor na zahtjev za evidentiranje zainteresirane strane dostavile su primjedbe koje je Komisija razmotrila u Uredbi o evidentiranju.
The Commission had at its disposal sufficient evidence justifying the need to register imports.
Komisija je na raspolaganju imala dovoljno dokaza kojima se opravdava potreba za evidentiranjem uvoza.
Under Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product concerned are subject to registration for the purpose of ensuring that should the investigation result in findings leading to the imposition of countervailing duties, those duties can, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled, be levied retroactively on the registered imports in accordance with the applicable legal provisions.
U skladu s člankom 24. stavkom 5. osnovne uredbe uvoz predmetnog proizvoda podliježe evidentiranju kako bi se, ako se ispitnim postupkom utvrde nalazi koji dovode do uvođenja kompenzacijskih pristojbi i ako su ispunjeni potrebni uvjeti, osigurala retroaktivna naplata pristojbi na evidentirani uvoz u skladu s primjenjivim zakonskim odredbama.
Following the publication of the registration Regulation, the Commission received comments in this regard from the GOA and CARBIO.
Nakon objave Uredbe o evidentiranju Komisija je o tome primila primjedbe vlade Argentine i Argentinske komore za biogoriva.
The comments of the GOA concerned the allegation that the Commission failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence of subsidisation and to demonstrate that injury to the Union industry was caused by massive imports of Argentinian biodiesel in a relatively short period.
Primjedbe vlade Argentine odnosile su se na tvrdnju da Komisija nije dostavila dostatne dokaze o subvencioniranju te da nije dokazala štetu koja je prouzročena industriji Unije masovnim uvozom argentinskog biodizela u relativno kratkom razdoblju.
As explained in recitals (5) to (7), the Commission considered that it had sufficient evidence of subsidisation and threat of injury at the time of initiation.
Kako je objašnjeno u uvodnim izjavama od 5. do 7., Komisija je smatrala da je u trenutku pokretanja postupka imala dostatne dokaze o subvencioniranju i prijetnji štete.
In addition, in recital (14) of the registration Regulation, the Commission provided evidence of a massive increase of Argentinian imports of biodiesel in absolute terms and in terms of market share in the period between August 2017 and March 2018, which could show the existence of material injury towards the end of the investigation period.
Usto, u uvodnoj izjavi 14. Uredbe o evidentiranju, Komisija je iznijela dokaze o masovnom povećanju uvoza argentinskog biodizela u apsolutnom smislu i u smislu tržišnog udjela u razdoblju od kolovoza 2017. do ožujka 2018., što bi moglo ukazivati na postojanje materijalne štete potkraj razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
Consequently, those allegations were rejected.
Stoga su te tvrdnje odbijene.
The investigation of subsidisation and injury covered the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017 (‘the investigation period’).
Ispitnim postupkom o subvencioniranju i šteti obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2017. do 31. prosinca 2017. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka”).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2014 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Ispitivanjem kretanja važnih za procjenu štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2014. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka („razmatrano razdoblje”).
In the Notice of Initiation, interested parties were invited to contact the Commission in order to participate in the investigation.
U Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka Komisija je zainteresirane strane pozvala da joj se obrate radi sudjelovanja u ispitnom postupku.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers and the GOA, the known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Osim toga, Komisija je o pokretanju ispitnog postupka obavijestila podnositelja pritužbe, druge poznate proizvođače iz Unije, poznate proizvođače izvoznike i vladu Argentine, poznate uvoznike, dobavljače, korisnike i trgovce, te udruženja za koja se zna da se postupak na njih odnosi, te ih je pozvala na sudjelovanje.
In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample the interested parties in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
U Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka Komisija je navela da bi mogla provesti odabir uzorka zainteresiranih strana u skladu s člankom 27. osnovne uredbe.
The Commission selected the sample on the basis of the highest representative production, which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija je odabrala uzorak na temelju najveće reprezentativne proizvodnje koja se razumno mogla ispitati u raspoloživom vremenu.
The provisional sample consisted of three Union producers and represented a broad geographical spread.
Privremeni se uzorak sastojao od triju proizvođača iz Unije i imao je široku zemljopisnu zastupljenost.
The sampled Union producers accounted for 19 % of the total production volume of the Union industry.
Proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku činili su 19 % ukupnog obujma proizvodnje industrije Unije.
The Commission received substantiated comments on the provisional sample from CARBIO, Greenergy Fuels Limited and from the complainant.
CARBIO, Greenergy Fuels Limited i podnositelj pritužbe Komisiji su dostavili potkrijepljene primjedbe na privremeni uzorak.
Recitals (310) to (313) provide a more detailed analysis of those comments.
Te su primjedbe detaljnije analizirane u uvodnim izjavama od 310. do 313.
As a result, the Commission replaced one of the Union producers in the provisional sample with another.
Kao rezultat toga, Komisija je jednog od proizvođača iz Unije u privremenom uzorku zamijenila drugim.
The final sample consisted of three Union producers located in three different Member States.
Konačni uzorak sastojao se od proizvođača iz Unije iz triju različitih država članica.
It accounted for over 23 % of Union production.
Činio je više od 23 % proizvodnje u Uniji.
Two unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Dva nepovezana uvoznika dostavila su zatražene informacije i pristala na uvrštenje u uzorak.
In view of the low number of unrelated importers, the Commission decided that sampling was not necessary.
S obzirom na mali broj nepovezanih uvoznika Komisija je odlučila da odabir uzorka nije potreban.
Sampling of exporting producers in Argentina
Odabir uzorka proizvođača izvoznika iz Argentine
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in Argentina to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od svih proizvođača izvoznika iz Argentine zatražila da dostave informacije određene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
In addition, the Commission asked the authorities of Argentina to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Usto, Komisija je od argentinskih nadležnih tijela zatražila da utvrde ostale proizvođače izvoznike koji bi mogli biti zainteresirani za sudjelovanje u ispitnom postupku i/ili da stupe u kontakt s njima.
Nine producers in the country concerned provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Devet proizvođača iz predmetne zemlje dostavilo je zatražene informacije i pristalo da ih se uključi u uzorak.
The Commission excluded one company from the sample, as it did not export biodiesel to the Union in the investigation period.
Komisija je iz uzorka isključila jedno trgovačko društvo jer u razdoblju ispitnog postupka nije izvozilo u Uniju.
The remaining eight companies or groups of companies accounted for 100 % of exports to the Union during the investigation period.
Preostalih osam društava ili grupa društava tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka činilo je 100 % izvoza u Uniju.
In accordance with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the following sample of three groups of exporting producers on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available:
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 1. točkom (b) osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala sljedeći uzorak od triju grupa proizvođača izvoznika na temelju najvećeg reprezentativnog obujma izvoza u Uniju koji bi se razumno mogao ispitati u raspoloživom vremenu:
Group Renova (Molinos Agro SA, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos SACIFIyA, Vicentin SAIC), Argentina,
Grupa Renova (Molinos Agro SA, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos SACIFIyA, Vicentin SAIC), Argentina;
Group T6 (Aceitera General Deheza SA, Bunge Argentina SA), Argentina,
Grupa T6 (Aceitera General Deheza SA, Bunge Argentina SA), Argentina;
Louis Dreyfus Commodities (‘LDC’) Argentina SA, Argentina.
Louis Dreyfus Commodities („LDC”) Argentina SA, Argentina.
The sampled groups of exporting producers represented 84 % of the total exports to the Union of the product concerned during the investigation period.
Grupe proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku činile su 84 % ukupnog izvoza predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission consulted all known exporting producers concerned and the GOA on the selection of the sample.
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe Komisija se o odabiru uzorka savjetovala sa svim poznatim proizvođačima izvoznicima za koje se zna da se postupak na njih odnosi te s vladom Argentine.
The Commission received no comments on the proposed sample.
Komisija nije primila nikakve primjedbe na predloženi uzorak.
No exporting producer, which was not included in the sample, requested individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Nijedan proizvođač izvoznik koji nije bio uključen u uzorak nije zatražio pojedinačno ispitivanje u skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 3. osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the GOA, to the three sampled groups of exporting producers, to the three sampled Union producers, and to the two unrelated importers that had come forward.
Komisija je upitnike poslala vladi Argentine, trima grupama proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku, trima proizvođačima iz Unije u uzorku i dvama nepovezanim uvoznicima koji su se javili.
The Commission received questionnaire replies from the GOA, all sampled groups of exporting producers, all sampled Union producers but only one of the two cooperating unrelated importers.
Komisiji su odgovore na upitnik dostavili vlada Argentine, sve grupe proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku, svi proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku, no samo jedan od dvaju nepovezanih uvoznika koji surađuju.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of subsidy, resulting threat of injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zatražila i provjerila sve informacije koje je smatrala potrebnima za utvrđivanje subvencije, posljedične prijetnje štete i interesa Unije.
A verification visit took place at the premises of the Argentinian Ministries of Agroindustry, Foreign Affairs, Production and Taxation, during which officials from other relevant ministries also participated.
Posjet radi provjere, u kojem su sudjelovali i službenici drugih relevantnih ministarstava, obavljen je u prostorima argentinskih ministarstava agroindustrije, vanjskih poslova, proizvodnje i oporezivanja.
Verification visits also took place at the premises of the Banco de Córdoba, the Banco de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, the Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, the Banco Central de la República Argentina and the Banco de la Nación Argentina.
Posjeti radi provjere obavljeni su i u prostorima banaka Banco de Córdoba, Banco de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Banco Central de la República Argentina i Banco de la Nación Argentina.
Verification visits under Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the EBB and the following companies:
Posjeti radi provjere u skladu s člankom 26. osnovne uredbe obavljeni su u prostorima EBB-a i sljedećih društava:
Masol Iberia Biofuel, S.L.U., El Grao (Castellón) and Barcelona, Spain,
Masol Iberia Biofuel, S.L.U., El Grao (Castellón) i Barcelona, Španjolska,
Saipol, Grand-Couronne, France,
Saipol, Grand-Couronne, Francuska,
Verbio Vereinigte BioEnergie AG, Leipzig, Germany;
Verbio Vereinigte BioEnergie AG, Leipzig, Njemačka,
Sampled exporting producers in Argentina:
proizvođači izvoznici u uzorku iz Argentine:
Vicentin SAIC, Buenos Aires;
Vicentin SAIC, Buenos Aires,
Group T6:
Grupa T6:
Bunge Argentina SA, Buenos Aires;
Bunge Argentina SA, Buenos Aires,
Given that the Commission found it necessary to collect further information on developments after the investigation period, which could further confirm the Commission's preliminary findings and shed more light on the Union interest, the Commission decided not to impose provisional measures in this case.
S obzirom na to da je Komisija utvrdila da je potrebno prikupiti dodatne informacije o razvoju događaja nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka, koje bi mogle dodatno potvrditi Komisijine privremene nalaze i više razjasniti interes Unije, Komisija je odlučila da u ovom predmetu neće uvesti privremene mjere.
On 21 September 2018, by means of an information document describing its preliminary findings, the Commission informed all interested parties that no provisional countervailing duties would be imposed on imports into the Union of biodiesel originating in Argentina.
Komisija je 21. rujna 2018. u dokumentu s informacijama u kojem je opisala svoje privremene nalaze sve zainteresirane strane obavijestila da se na uvoz biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine u Uniju neće uvesti privremene kompenzacijske pristojbe.
On 8 October 2018, six Member States (France, Spain, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal and Romania) requested the Commission to impose provisional countervailing measures in this case.
Šest država članica (Francuska, Španjolska, Bugarska, Poljska, Portugal i Rumunjska) 8. listopada 2018. zatražilo je od Komisije da uvede privremene kompenzacijske mjere u ovom predmetu.
By letter of 10 October 2018, the Commission confirmed that the investigation was ongoing and that further facts would be considered (in particular, developments immediately following the investigation period).
Komisija je dopisom od 10. listopada 2018. potvrdila da je ispitni postupak u tijeku i da će se dodatne činjenice razmotriti (konkretno razvoj događaja neposredno nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka).
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard, including with the Hearing Officer.
Stranama koje su to zatražile omogućeno je da budu saslušane, uključujući pred službenikom za saslušanje.
Following the disclosure of the information document, comments were received from the GOA, CARBIO, all sampled groups of exporting producers, and the EBB.
Nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama zaprimljene su primjedbe vlade Argentine, CARBIO-a, svih grupa proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku i EBB-a.
The information included in particular, but was not limited to, the additional questionnaire replies received from the EBB and the sampled Union producers concerning the developments after the investigation period, data on biodiesel imports to the Union after the investigation period and data provided by interested parties following the disclosure of the information document.
Te su informacije, među ostalim, sadržavale dodatne odgovore na upitnik EBB-a i proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku o razvoju događaja nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka, podatke o uvozu biodizela u Uniju nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka i podatke koje su zainteresirane strane dostavile nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama.
On 3 December 2018, the Commission disclosed to all parties the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive countervailing duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Komisija je 3. prosinca 2018. svim stranama objavila bitne činjenice i razmatranja na temelju kojih namjerava uvesti konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
Following final disclosure, the EBB, Copa (Committee of Professional Agricultural Organisations), Cogeca (General Confederation of Agricultural Cooperatives in the European Union) and the European Oilseed Alliance welcomed the Commission's intention to impose a definitive countervailing duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Nakon konačne objave EBB, Copa (Odbor profesionalnih poljoprivrednih organizacija), Cogeca (Opće udruženje poljoprivrednih zadruga u Europskoj uniji) i Europski savez za uljarice pozdravili su namjeru Komisije da uvede konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
The product concerned is fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, commonly known as ‘biodiesel’, in pure form or as included in a blend, originating in Argentina (‘the product concerned’).
Predmetni proizvod jesu monoalkilni esteri masnih kiselina i/ili parafinska plinska ulja dobivena sintezom i/ili hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnog podrijetla, uobičajeno poznat kao „biodizel”, u čistom obliku ili u mješavini, podrijetlom iz Argentine („predmetni proizvod”).
The investigation showed that biodiesel produced in Argentina is exclusively soybean methyl ester (‘SME’) derived from soybean oil, whereas biodiesel produced in the Union is mainly rapeseed methyl ester (‘RME’) but made also from other feedstock, including waste oils as well as virgin oils.
Ispitnim postupkom pokazalo se da je biodizel koji se proizvodi u Argentini isključivo metilni ester iz sojina ulja („SME”), dok je biodizel koji se proizvodi u Uniji uglavnom metilni ester iz repice („RME”), ali se dobiva i iz drugih sirovina, uključujući otpadna ulja te djevičanska ulja.
SME and RME both belong to the category of fatty-acid methyl esters (FAME).
SME i RME pripadaju kategoriji metilnih estera masnih kiselina (FAME).
The term ‘ester’ refers to the transesterification of vegetable oils, namely, the mingling of the oil with alcohol, which produces biodiesel and, as a by-product, glycerine.
Pojam „ester” odnosi se na transesterifikaciju biljnih ulja, odnosno miješanje ulja s alkoholom, čime nastaju biodizel i, kao nusproizvod, glicerin.
The term ‘methyl’ refers to methanol, the most commonly used alcohol in the process.
Pojam „metil” odnosi se na metanol, alkohol koji se najčešće upotrebljava u tom procesu.
SME biodiesel could be used in its pure form but is generally blended before being used in the Union.
SME biodizel mogao bi se upotrebljavati u čistom obliku, ali se obično miješa prije upotrebe u Uniji.
The reason for blending is that SME in its pure form does not meet the European standard EN 14214 as regards iodine and cetane numbers.
To se radi jer SME u čistom obliku nije u skladu s europskom normom EN 14214 u pogledu jodnog i cetanskog broja.
The reason for blending SME with RME is that SME has a higher Cold Filter Plugging Point (‘CFPP’) than RME and is therefore not suitable for use in its pure form during winter months in cold regions of the European Union.
SME se miješa s RME-om jer SME ima višu točku začepljenja filtra za gorivo na niskoj temperaturi (Cold Filter Plugging Point – CFPP) nego RME pa nije pogodan za upotrebu u čistom obliku tijekom zimskih mjeseci u hladnijim dijelovima Europske unije.
The blends of biodiesel and mineral diesel are ultimately used in the transport sector as a fuel in diesel powered engines of road vehicles such as cars, trucks and buses, and also in trains.
Te mješavine biodizela i mineralnih dizela na kraju se upotrebljavaju u prometnom sektoru kao gorivo za dizelske motore u cestovnim vozilima kao što su automobili, kamioni i autobusi te u vlakovima.
Biodiesel in its pure form or blended with mineral diesels can also be used as a heating fuel in domestic, commercial or industrial boilers and as a fuel for generators to produce electricity.
Biodizel u čistom obliku ili miješan s mineralnim dizelom može se upotrebljavati i kao gorivo za ogrjev u kućanskim, komercijalnim ili industrijskim kotlovima te kao gorivo za generatore koji proizvode električnu energiju.
There are trials to introduce biodiesel for air transport, in order to reduce CO2 emissions by the air industry.
Testira se uvođenje biodizela u zračni promet radi smanjenja emisije CO2 zračne industrije.
The product concerned is currently falling within CN codes ex15162098 (TARIC codes 1516209821, 1516209829 and 1516209830), ex15180091 (TARIC codes 1518009121, 1518009129 and 1518009130), ex15180095 (TARIC code 1518009510), ex15180099 (TARIC codes 1518009921, 1518009929 and 1518009930), ex27101943 (TARIC codes 2710194321, 2710194329 and 2710194330), ex27101946 (TARIC codes 2710194621, 2710194629 and 2710194630), ex27101947 (TARIC codes 2710194721, 2710194729 and 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992 (TARIC codes 3824999210, 3824999212 and 3824999220), 38260010 and ex38260090 (TARIC codes 3826009011, 3826009019 and 3826009030).
Predmetni proizvod trenutačno je razvrstan u oznake KN ex15162098 (oznake TARIC 1516209821, 1516209829 i 1516209830), ex15180091 (oznake TARIC 1518009121, 1518009129 i 1518009130), ex15180095 (oznaka TARIC 1518009510), ex15180099 (oznake TARIC 1518009921, 1518009929 i 1518009930), ex27101943 (oznake TARIC 2710194321, 2710194329 i 2710194330), ex27101946 (oznake TARIC 2710194621, 2710194629 i 2710194630), ex27101947 (oznake TARIC 2710194721, 2710194729 i 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992 (oznake TARIC 3824999210, 3824999212 i 3824999220), 38260010 i ex38260090 (oznake TARIC 3826009011, 3826009019 i 3826009030).
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical, chemical, and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses:
Ispitni je postupak pokazao da sljedeći proizvodi imaju ista osnovna fizička, kemijska i tehnička svojstva te iste osnovne namjene:
the product produced and sold on the domestic market of Argentina;
proizvod koji se proizvodi i prodaje na domaćem tržištu Argentine;
The Commission decided that those products are therefore like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je stoga odlučila da su ti proizvodi istovjetni proizvodi u smislu članka 2. točke (c) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission received no claims regarding the product scope.
Komisija nije primila nikakve tvrdnje u pogledu opsega proizvoda.
On the basis of the information available, including information contained in the complaint, the Notice of Initiation and the replies to the Commission's questionnaire, the Commission investigated the alleged subsidisation by the GOA through the following subsidy programmes:
Na temelju dostupnih informacija, uključujući informacije sadržane u pritužbi, Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka i odgovorima na Komisijin upitnik, Komisija je ispitala navodno subvencioniranje koje vlada Argentine provodi u okviru sljedećih programa subvencioniranja:
Government's support to the biodiesel industry including through the provision of soybeans for less than adequate remuneration (‘LTAR’);
vladine potpore industriji biodizela, uključujući dobavu soje uz naknadu manju od primjerene;