natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the Authority noted that the analytical results provided were consistently and considerably lower (up to 360 mg/kg) than the proposed level of 620 mg/kg for ethylene glycol individually or in combination with diethylene glycol in the EU specifications for E 1209.
No Agencija je primijetila da su dostavljeni analitički rezultati redovito i znatno niži (najviše 360 mg/kg) od predložene razine od 620 mg/kg za etilen glikol pojedinačno ili u kombinaciji s dietilen glikolom u EU-ovim specifikacijama za E 1209.
It followed from the discussions with Member States at the Working Party of Governmental Experts on Food Additives that the maximum limit for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol should be kept as low as can reasonably be achieved as demonstrated by the analytical data to limit their contribution to the TDI.
U raspravi s državama članicama u okviru radne skupine vladinih stručnjaka za prehrambene aditive zaključeno je da najvišu dopuštenu količinu etilen glikola i dietilen glikola treba držati na najnižoj razumno ostvarivoj razini, prema analitičkim podacima, kako bi se ograničio njihov utjecaj na prihvatljivi dnevni unos.
When updating specifications laid down in Regulation (EU) No 231/2012, it is necessary to take into account the specifications and analytical techniques for food additives as set out in the Codex Alimentarius as drafted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).
Kada se ažuriraju specifikacije utvrđene u Uredbi (EU) br. 231/2012, potrebno je uzeti u obzir specifikacije i analitičke tehnike za prehrambene aditive kako su utvrđene u Codexu Alimentariusu kako ga je sastavio Zajednički stručni odbor FAO-a/WHO-a za prehrambene aditive (JECFA).
Consequently, it is appropriate to amend the levels of the impurities ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in the food additive polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol-graft-co-polymer (E 1209) to ‘not more than 400 mg/kg for ethylene glycol individually or in combination with diethylene glycol’.
Stoga je primjereno izmijeniti razine nečistoća etilen glikola i dietilen glikola u prehrambenom aditivu polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimeru (E 1209) na „najviše 400 mg/kg za etilen glikol pojedinačno ili u kombinaciji s dietilen glikolom”.
EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3303, 31 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3303
EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3303, 31 str. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3303
EFSA Journal 2017;15(6):4865, 23 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4865
EFSA Journal 2017;15(6):4865, 23 str. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4865
Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: eightieth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.
Ocjena određenih prehrambenih aditiva i kontaminanata: osamdeseto izvješće Zajedničkog stručnog odbora FAO/WHO za prehrambene aditive.
In the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012, as regards the purity levels for the food additive E 1209 polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft-co-polymer, the entries for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol are replaced by the following:
U Prilogu Uredbi (EU) br. 231/2012 u pogledu razina čistoće za prehrambeni aditiv E 1209 polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol graft-kopolimer, unosi za etilen glikol i dietilen glikol zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
‘Ethylene glycols (mono- and di-)
„Etilen glikoli (mono- i di-)
Not more than 400 mg/kg (singly or in combination)’
Najviše 400 mg/kg, pojedinačno ili u kombinaciji”
JECFA's specifications for polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft-co-polymer (INS 1209) were prepared at the 80th JECFA's meeting and published in the FAO JECFA Monographs 17 in 2015.
Specifikacije JECFA-a za polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol graft-kopolimer(INS 1209) pripremljene su na 80. sastanku JEFCA i objavljene 2015. u monografiji FAO JECFA br. 17.
The level for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol set therein is of ‘Not more than 400 mg/kg (singly or in combination)’.
Razina etilen glikola i dietilen glikola navedena u njoj jest „ne više od 400 mg/kg (pojedinačno ili u kombinaciji)”.
EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to food), 2013.
Znanstveni odbor EFSA-e za prehrambene aditive i hranjive tvari dodane hrani (ANS), 2013.
Scientific Opinion on the safety of polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol-graft-co-polymer as a food additive.
Znanstveno mišljenje o sigurnosti polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimera kao prehrambenog aditiva.
EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to food), 2017.
Znanstveni odbor EFSA-e za prehrambene aditive i hranjive tvari dodane hrani (ANS), 2017.
Scientific Opinion on safety of the proposed amendment of the specifications for the food additive polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol-graft-co-polymer (E 1209).
Znanstveno mišljenje o sigurnosti predložene izmjene specifikacija za prehrambeni aditiv polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimer (E 1209).
WHO Technical Report Series 995.
Tehničko izvješće WHO-a br. 995.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/682
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/682
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in emulsified sauces
o izmjeni Priloga II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) u emulgiranim umacima
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 lays down a Union list of food additives approved for use in foods and their conditions of use.
U Prilogu II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 utvrđen je Unijin popis prehrambenih aditiva odobrenih za uporabu u hrani i uvjeti njihove uporabe.
According to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) is an already authorised food additive in food category 12.6 ‘Sauces’ (at a maximum level of 4000 mg/kg), but only for dressings.
U skladu s Prilogom II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) već je odobreni prehrambeni aditiv u kategoriji hrane 12.6. „Umaci” (u najvećoj dopuštenoj količini od 4000 mg/kg), ali samo za preljeve za salatu.
Pursuant to Article 32(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) needs to be subject to a new risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’).
U skladu s člankom 32. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1333/2008 Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”) mora provesti novu procjenu rizika za poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476).
Pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 the re-evaluation of emulsifiers had to be completed by 31 December 2016.
U skladu s Uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 257/2010 ponovna procjena emulgatora trebala je biti dovršena do 31. prosinca 2016.
On 4 August 2014, an application was submitted for the authorisation of the use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as an emulsifier in emulsified sauces.
Dana 4. kolovoza 2014. podnesen je zahtjev za odobrenje uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) kao emulgatora u emulgiranim umacima.
The application was subsequently made available to the Member States by the Commission pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008.
Komisija je potom na temelju članka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1331/2008 stavila zahtjev na raspolaganje državama članicama.
Fat reduction in processed food, such as emulsified sauces, is normally achieved by the use of thickeners.
Smanjenje masti u prerađenim prehrambenim proizvodima, kao što su emulgirani umaci, obično se postiže uporabom zgušnjivača.
However, thickeners lead to an undesirable modification of the organoleptic properties of the food when used above a certain concentration.
Međutim, zgušnjivači dovode do neželjenih promjena organoleptičkih svojstava hrane ako se upotrebljavaju iznad određene koncentracije.
An additional reduction of fat content can be achieved in some foods, such as emulsified sauces, by the use of emulsifiers capable of stabilising a high content of water inside fat.
Dodatno smanjenje sadržaja masti u određenoj hrani, kao što su emulgirani umaci, može se postići uporabom emulgatora za stabilizaciju visokog sadržaja vode u masti.
In studies carried out by the applicant comparing the effectiveness of different emulsifiers for further fat reduction in emulsified sauces, polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) gave the best results both in terms of physical as well as organoleptic properties of the obtained emulsified sauce.
U studijama koje je proveo podnositelj zahtjeva i u kojima je uspoređena učinkovitost različitih emulgatora u pogledu dodatnog smanjenja masti u emulgiranim umacima poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) pokazao je najbolje rezultate u pogledu fizičkih i organoleptičkih svojstava dobivenog emulgiranog umaka.
The level of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) needed to achieve the intended technological function was 4000 mg/kg.
Količina poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) potrebna za postizanje željene tehnološke funkcije bila je 4000 mg/kg.
On 27 May 2016, the Commission requested the Authority to evaluate the safety of the proposed extension of use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in emulsified sauces in addition to the re-evaluation of the safety of this substance pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010.
Dana 27. svibnja 2016. Komisija je od Agencije zatražila ocjenu sigurnosti predloženog proširenja uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) u emulgiranim umacima zajedno s ponovnom procjenom sigurnosti te tvari u skladu s Uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 257/2010.
On 24 March 2017, the Authority delivered a Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) and established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 25 mg polyglycerol polyricinoleate/kg body weight/day.
Agencija je 24. ožujka 2017. donijela znanstveno mišljenje o ponovnoj procjeni poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) te utvrdila prihvatljivi dnevni unos (PDU) od 25 mg poliglicerol poliricinoleata po kg tjelesne mase po danu.
Considering that the exposure estimates did not exceed the ADI, the Authority concluded that polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive would not be of safety concern if used at the permitted or reported use and use levels.
S obzirom na to da procijenjena izloženost nije premašila PDU, Agencija je zaključila da poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) kao prehrambeni aditiv ne predstavlja sigurnosni rizik ako se upotrebljava prema dopuštenoj ili prijavljenoj uporabi i razinama uporabe.
The Authority also concluded that the additional use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) at the maximum level of 4000 mg/kg in emulsiﬁed sauces would not result in a total exposure to this substance exceeding the ADI.
Agencija je zaključila i da dodatna uporaba poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) u najvećoj dopuštenoj količini od 4000 mg/kg u emulgiranim umacima ne bi dovela do ukupne izloženosti toj tvari koja bi premašila PDU.
Consequently, the extension of use for polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in emulsified sauces is not of safety concern.
Stoga proširenje uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) na emulgirane umake ne predstavlja sigurnosni rizik.
In addition, the Authority recommended several amendments to the specifications of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012.
Agencija je osim toga preporučila nekoliko izmjena specifikacija poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) u Uredbi Komisije (EU) br. 231/2012.
These are to a large extent linked to the use of glycerol in the manufacturing process of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) and are therefore similar to the recommendations made by the Authority in its Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of glycerol (E 422).
Izmjene su u velikoj mjeri povezane s uporabom glicerola u postupku proizvodnje poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) i stoga su slične preporukama iz znanstvenog mišljenja Agencije o ponovnoj procjeni glicerola (E 422).
Consequently, the amendment of the specifications of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476), in line with the recommendations of the Authority, will be addressed separately, together with the specifications of glycerol (E 422) and of other glycerol-based food additives.
Slijedom toga i u skladu s preporukama Agencije, izmjena specifikacija poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) rješavat će se zasebno, zajedno sa specifikacijama glicerola (E 422) i drugih prehrambenih aditiva na bazi glicerola.
Therefore, it is appropriate to authorise the use of polyglycerol polyricinolate (E 476) as an emulsifier in emulsified sauces, including dressings, in food category 12.6 ‘Sauces’ (at a maximum level of 4000 mg/kg).
Stoga je primjereno odobriti uporabu poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) kao emulgatora u emulgiranim umacima, uključujući preljeve za salatu, u kategoriji hrane 12.6. „Umaci” (u najvećoj dopuštenoj količini od 4000 mg/kg).
EFSA Journal 2017;15(3):4743.
EFSA Journal 2017.; 15(3):4743.
EFSA Journal 2017;15(3):4720.
EFSA Journal 2017.; 15(3):4720.
In Part E of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, in food category 12.6 ‘Sauces’, the entry for polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) is replaced by the following:
U dijelu E Priloga II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008, u kategoriji hrane 12.6. „Umaci”, unos za poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Polyglycerol polyricinoleate
Poliglicerol poliricinoleat
only emulsified sauces’
samo emulgirani umaci”
Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/683
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/683
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in the People's Republic of China, and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163
o uvođenju privremene antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenih pneumatskih guma, novih ili protektiranih, od kaučuka, vrste koja se rabi za autobuse ili kamione, s indeksom opterećenja većim od 121, podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/163
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union, and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije, a posebno njezin članak 7. stavak 4.,
On 30 June 2017, the coalition against unfair tyres imports (‘the complainant’) lodged a complaint on behalf of producers representing more than 45 % of the total Union production of new and retreaded tyres for buses or lorries.
Koalicija protiv nepoštenog uvoza guma („podnositelj pritužbe”) 30. lipnja 2017. podnijela je pritužbu u ime proizvođača koji čine više od 45 % ukupne proizvodnje novih i protektiranih guma za autobuse ili kamione u Uniji.
The complaint contained sufficient evidence of dumping and of resulting injury.
Pritužba je sadržavala dostatne dokaze o dampingu i nastaloj šteti.
On 11 August 2017, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the Union of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 (‘new and retreaded tyres’ or ‘the product concerned’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the country concerned’ or ‘the PRC’) on the basis of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the basic Regulation’).
Europska komisija („Komisija”) pokrenula je 11. kolovoza 2017. antidampinški ispitni postupak u pogledu uvoza u Uniju određenih pneumatskih guma, novih ili protektiranih, od kaučuka, vrste koja se rabi za autobuse ili kamione, s indeksom opterećenja većim od 121 („nove i protektirane gume” ili „predmetni proizvod”), podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („predmetna zemlja” ili „NRK”) na temelju članka 5. Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća („Osnovna uredba”).
It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘the Notice of Initiation’).
Obavijest o pokretanju postupka objavila je u Službenom listu Europske unije („Obavijest o pokretanju postupka”).
On 21 October, the Commission issued a corrigendum to the Notice of Initiation in which it clarified the scope of the definition of the product concerned.
Komisija je 21. listopada izdala ispravak Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka u kojem je jasnije definirano područje primjene definicije predmetnog proizvoda.
On 14 October 2017, the Commission initiated an anti-subsidy investigation with regard to imports into the Union of new and retreaded tyres for buses and lorries originating in the PRC and started a separate investigation.
Komisija je 14. listopada 2017. pokrenula antisubvencijski ispitni postupak u pogledu uvoza u Uniju novih i protektiranih guma za autobuse i kamione podrijetlom iz NRK-a i započela zasebni ispitni postupak.
It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Obavijest o pokretanju postupka objavila je u Službenom listu Europske unije.
On 30 August 2016, the complainant submitted a request for registration of imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Podnositelj pritužbe podnio je 30. kolovoza 2016. zahtjev za evidentiranje uvoza predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom iz NRK-a na temelju članka 14. stavka 5. Osnovne uredbe.
On 4 October 2017, China Rubber Industry Association (‘CRIA’) and the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers and Exporters (‘CCCMC’) submitted comments on the request for registration.
Kinesko udruženje industrije gume („CRIA”) i Kineska trgovačka komora uvoznika i izvoznika metala, minerala i kemikalija („CCCMC”) 4. listopada 2017. dostavili su primjedbe na zahtjev za evidentiranje.
They claimed that the request had failed to satisfy the applicable evidentiary standard as there was no evidence of a history of dumping, a substantial rise in imports and that the imports are likely to seriously undermine the remedial effects of the duty.
Tvrdili su da u zahtjevu nije zadovoljen primjenjivi standard dokaza jer ne postoje dokazi o prethodnom dampingu, znatnom povećanju uvoza i vjerojatnosti da bi uvoz mogao ozbiljno ugroziti pozitivne učinke pristojbe.
On 19 October 2017, the Commission held a hearing at the request of CRIA during which it reiterated its earlier comments.
Komisija je 19. listopada 2017. održala saslušanje na zahtjev CRIA-e tijekom kojega je ponovila svoje ranije primjedbe.
On 2 February 2018, the Commission published Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163 (‘the registration regulation’) making imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC subject to registration as of 3 February 2018 onwards.
Komisija je 2. veljače 2018. objavila Provedbenu uredbu Komisije (EU) 2018/163 („Uredba o evidentiranju”) kojom je uvela obvezu evidentiranja uvoza predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom iz NRK-a od 3. veljače 2018. nadalje.
In that Regulation, the Commission assessed the comments made by interested parties.
U toj je uredbi Komisija ocijenila primjedbe zainteresiranih strana.
After the registration entered into force Hankook Group claimed that its rights of defence were violated as no information regarding the Commission's intention to make imports of the product concerned subject to registration had been communicated to it before the entry into force of the registration regulation.
Nakon što je evidentiranje stupilo na snagu Grupa Hankook tvrdila je da su povrijeđena njezina prava na obranu jer prije stupanja na snagu Uredbe o evidentiranju nije primila obavijest o namjeri Komisije da uvede obvezu evidentiranja predmetnog proizvoda.
For that reason the Hankook Group claimed that there was a breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Zbog toga je Grupa Hankook tvrdila da je povrijeđen članak 41. Povelje Europske unije o temeljnim pravima.
The Commission observed that prior disclosure is mandatory under Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation before the imposition of definitive measures.
Komisija je primijetila da je u skladu s člankom 20. stavkom 2. Osnovne uredbe prethodna objava obvezna prije uvođenja konačnih mjera.
The same does not apply to a registration decision under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
To se ne primjenjuje na odluku o evidentiranju na temelju članka 14. stavka 5. Osnovne uredbe.
That Article only provides for the prior information to Member States in due time.
U tom je članku predviđeno samo da države članice treba obavijestiti na vrijeme.
Moreover, the right to be heard under Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union only applies to individual adverse measures.
Nadalje, pravo na saslušanje iz članka 41. stavka 2. točke (a) Povelje Europske unije o temeljnim pravima primjenjuje se samo na pojedinačne mjere s negativnim učincima.
In this case, the Commission directed the Union customs authorities to register imports.
U ovom predmetu Komisija je carinskim tijelima Unije naredila da evidentiraju uvoz.
The registration regulation is not an individual measure affecting the Hankook Group adversely.
Uredba o evidentiranju nije pojedinačna mjera koja ima negativan učinak na Grupu Hankook.
It was neither addressed to the Hankook Group nor did it produce individual negative effects for that group.
Nije bila upućena Grupi Hankook niti je proizvela pojedinačne negativne učinke za tu grupu.
Therefore, neither the rights of defence of the Hankook Group nor Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union were violated.
Stoga nisu povrijeđena ni prava Grupe Hankook na obranu ni članak 41. Povelje Europske unije o temeljnim pravima.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 (‘the investigation period’).
Ispitnim postupkom o dampingu i šteti obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. srpnja 2016. do 30. lipnja 2017. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka”).
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it to participate in the investigation.
Komisija je u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka pozvala zainteresirane strane da joj se obrate radi sudjelovanja u ispitnom postupku.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers, the authorities of the People's Republic of China, known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Uz to, Komisija je posebno obavijestila podnositelja pritužbe, druge proizvođače iz Unije koji su joj poznati, proizvođače izvoznike koji su joj poznati, vlasti Narodne Republike Kine, uvoznike, dobavljače, korisnike i trgovce koji su joj poznati te udruženja za koja se zna da se na njih odnosi pokretanje ispitnog postupka te ih je pozvala na sudjelovanje.
Two Union producers, represented by the complainant, took this opportunity to request the Commission to keep their names confidential for fear that they could face retaliation by customers or competitors concerned by this investigation, in accordance with Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation.
Dva proizvođača iz Unije, koje predstavlja podnositelj pritužbe, iskoristila su tu priliku kako bi u skladu s člankom 19. stavkom 1. Osnovne uredbe zatražili od Komisije da njihovi nazivi budu povjerljivi zbog straha od moguće osvete kupaca ili konkurenata na koje utječe ovaj ispitni postupak.
Moreover, two cooperating Union producers requested the same status subsequently.
Nadalje, dva proizvođača iz Unije koja surađuju naknadno su zatražila isti status.
The Commission individually examined the merits of each confidentiality request.
Komisija je pojedinačno ispitala osnovanost svakog zahtjeva za povjerljivošću.
It established that there was indeed evidence of a significant possibility of retaliation in each case and accepted that the names of those companies should not be disclosed.
Utvrdila je da zaista postoje dokazi o znatnoj mogućnosti osvete u svakom slučaju i prihvatila da se nazivi tih društava ne otkriju.