natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Czech Republic and Slovak Republic have informed the Commission about the use of pyroligneous distillate [FL no. 21.001] in the traditional spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský and asked to maintain this use for these specific spirit drinks.
Češka Republika i Slovačka Republika obavijestile su Komisiju o upotrebi piroligninskog destilata [FL br. 21.001] u tradicionalnim jakim alkoholnim pićima tuzemák i tuzemský i zatražile nastavak te upotrebe za ta jaka alkoholna pića.
According to Recital 7 of the Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 the approval of flavourings should also take into account other factors relevant to the matter under consideration, including societal and traditional factors.
U skladu s uvodnom izjavom 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1334/2008 pri odobravanju aroma trebalo bi uzeti u obzir i druge čimbenike koji su važni za problem koji se razmatra, uključujući socijalne i tradicijske čimbenike.
Since the use of this flavouring is currently necessary for maintaining the specific traditional organoleptic characteristics of the spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský in Czech Republic and Slovak Republic, it is appropriate to authorise this substance under the conditions of use laid down in the Annex to this Regulation.
Budući da je upotreba te arome zasad nužna za održavanje određenih tradicionalnih organoleptičkih svojstava jakih alkoholnih pića tuzemák i tuzemský u Češkoj Republici i Slovačkoj Republici, primjereno je odobriti tu tvar u skladu s uvjetima upotrebe utvrđenima u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.
Those spirit drinks, like all spirit drinks and alcoholic beverages in general, are not intended to be consumed by children or other vulnerable parts of the population.
Ta jaka alkoholna pića, kao sva jaka alkoholna pića i alkoholna pića općenito, nisu namijenjena djeci ni drugim ranjivim skupinama stanovništva.
In addition to existing labelling requirements, Member States should require additional information to be provided regarding the specific risks linked to the presence of pyroligneous distillate (FL no. 21.001] in those traditional alcoholic beverages.
Osim postojećih zahtjeva za označivanje, države članice trebale bi zahtijevati da se navedu dodatne informacije o posebnim rizicima povezanima s prisutnošću piroligninskog destilata (FL br. 21.001] u tim tradicionalnim alkoholnim pićima.
The spirit drinks to which pyroligneous distillate [FL no. 21.001] has been added should not be used in the manufacture of other foodstuffs.
Jaka alkoholna pića kojima je dodan piroligninski destilat [FL br. 21.001] ne bi se smjela upotrebljavati za proizvodnju druge hrane.
When reference is made to the flavouring in the labelling of the spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský, the name or the FL number should be used.
Kad se pri označivanju jakih alkoholnih pića tuzemák i tuzemský spominje ta aroma, potrebno je navesti naziv i FL broj.
In addition to the requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, when pyroligneous distillate [FL no. 21.001] is marketed as such not intended for the sale to the ultimate consumer, it should be indicated in the labelling that this flavouring may only be used for the manufacture of the spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský.
Uz zahtjeve iz članka 15. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1334/2008, kad se piroligninski destilat [FL br. 21.001] kao takav stavlja na tržište i nije namijenjen za prodaju krajnjem potrošaču, pri označivanju bi trebalo navesti da se ta aroma smije upotrebljavati samo za proizvodnju jakih alkoholnih pića tuzemák i tuzemský.
In order to ensure legal certainty, this Regulation should be applicable as from 23 April 2018.
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost, ova bi se Uredba trebala primjenjivati od 23. travnja 2018.
This Regulation should be in force for a period of 5 years in order to allow for alternatives to pyroligneous distillate [FL no. 21.001] to be developed for the use in traditional spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský.
Ova Uredba trebala bi biti na snazi pet godina kako bi se omogućio razvoj alternative piroligninskom destilatu [FL no. 21.001] za upotrebu u tradicionalnim jakim alkoholnim pićima tuzemák i tuzemský.
Part E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Dio E Priloga I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1334/2008 stoga bi trebalo na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
Part E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Dio E Priloga I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1334/2008 mijenja se u skladu s Prilogom ovoj Uredbi.
The product pyroligneous distillate [FL no.21.001] is authorized in traditional spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský subject to restrictions of use laid in the Annex to this Regulation.
Proizvod piroligninski destilat [FL br. 21.001] odobren je u tradicionalnim jakim alkoholnim pićima tuzemák i tuzemský uz ograničenja upotrebe navedena u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.
It shall apply from 23 April 2018 until 19 September 2023.
Primjenjuje se od 23. travnja 2018. do 19. rujna 2023.
EFSA Journal 2017;15(8):4897.
EFSA Journal 2017.;15(8):4897.
In Part E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 the following entry concerning pyroligneous distillate [FL no: 21.001] is added:
U dijelu E Priloga I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1334/2008 dodaje se sljedeći unos koji se odnosi na piroligninski destilat [FL br.: 21.001]:
FL no.
FL br.
CAS no
CAS br.
JECFA No.
JECFA br.
CoE No.
CoE br.
Purity of the named flavouring
Čistoća navedene arome
Restrictions of use
Ograničenja upotrebe
Footnote
Bilješka
Reference
Referentno tijelo
Pyroligneous distillate
Piroligninski destilat
Complex mixture of substances, obtained by distillation of reaction products of pyroligneous acid and ethanol.
Složena smjesa sastojaka dobivenih destilacijom produkata reakcije piroligninske kiseline i etanola.
Liquid with rum-like tasting odour and taste.
Tekućina čiji miris i okus podsjećaju na rum.
Constituents:
Sastojci:
Ethanol (determined by Gas Chromatography/Flame Ionization Detector): more than 40 % w/w)
etanol (utvrđeno plinskom kromatografijom/ionizacijskim detektorom plamena): više od 40 % masenog udjela
Ethyl acetate: less than 25 % w/w)
etil-acetat: manje od 25 % masenog udjela
Ethyl formate: less than 2 % w/w)
etil-formijat: manje od 2 % masenog udjela
Ethyl propionate: less than 4 % w/w)
etil-propionat: manje od 4 % masenog udjela
Ethyl butyrate: less than 1,5 % w/w)
etil-butirat: manje od 1,5 % masenog udjela
Methyl acetate: less than 3,5 % w/w)
metil-acetat: manje od 3,5 % masenog udjela
Furan equivalents (furan and 2 methyl furan) expressed as furan: less than 8 mg/l
ekvivalenti furana (furan i 2-metil-furan) izraženi kao furan: manje od 8 mg/l
Methanol and methanol derivatives, expressed as methanol equivalents: less than 2 % (w/w)
metanol i derivati metanola, izraženi kao ekvivalenti metanola: manje od 2 % masenog udjela
Benzopyrene: less than 1 μg/l
benzopiren: manje od 1 μg/l
Benz(a)anthra-cene: less than 2 μg/l
benz(a)antracen: manje od 2 μg/l
acids (expressed as acetic acid): less than 1,00 g/l
kiseline (izražene kao octena kiselina): manje od 1,00 g/l
In the following spirit drinks only:
Samo u sljedećim jakim alkoholnim pićima:
tuzemák and tuzemský falling under Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 when marketed in the final package intended only for the final consumer, 3800 mg/l.
tuzemák i tuzemský na koje se primjenjuje Uredba (EZ) 110/2008 kad se stavljaju na tržište u konačnom pakiranju namijenjenom samo krajnjem potrošaču, 3800 mg/l.
When reference is made in the labelling to the flavouring pyroligneous distillate [FL no: 21.001] in the spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský, the name or the FL number shall be used.
Kad se pri označivanju spominje aroma piroligninski destilat [FL br.: 21.001] u jakim alkoholnim pićima tuzemák i tuzemský, navodi se naziv ili FL broj.
Tuzemák and tuzemský to which pyroligneous distillate [FL no: 21.001] has been added shall not be used in the manufacture of other foodstuffs.
Tuzemák i tuzemský kojima je dodan piroligninski destilat [FL br.: 21.001] ne smiju se upotrebljavati se u proizvodnji druge hrane.
In addition to the requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, when this flavouring is marketed as such, it shall be indicated in the labelling that this flavouring may only be used for the manufacture of the spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský.
Uz zahtjeve iz članka 15. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1334/2008, kad se ta aroma kao takva stavlja na tržište, pri označivanju se navodi da se ta aroma smije upotrebljavati samo za proizvodnju jakih alkoholnih pića tuzemák i tuzemský.
Member States shall require additional labelling, informing consumers about the specific risks linked to the presence of pyroligneous distillate [FL no. 21.001] in the spirit drinks tuzemák and tuzemský.
Države članice zahtijevaju dodatno označivanje kako bi se potrošače obavijestilo o posebnim rizicima povezanima s prisutnošću piroligninskog destilata [FL br. 21.001] u jakim alkoholnim pićima tuzemák i tuzemský.
EFSA’
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane”
On 24 August 2017, the Authority adopted its ‘Scientific Opinion of Flavouring Group Evaluation 500 (FGE.500): rum ether’, concerning the evaluation of the safety of pyroligneous distillate [FL no. 21.001] when used as a flavouring under the category ‘other flavourings’. This product is a complex mixture composed of more than eighty individual constituents. The Authority concluded that according to the overall strategy for the risk assessment of flavouring substances, the presence of genotoxic substances as constituents of rum ether is of safety concern. It indicated serious safety concerns relating to a number of constituents like furans and derivatives, and other constituents, associated with genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and also mentioned the carcinogenicity risks involved in the presence of ethanol.
Agencija je 24. kolovoza 2017. donijela „Znanstveno mišljenje o ocjeni skupine aroma 500 (FGE.500): „eter ruma” (Scientific Opinion of Flavouring Group Evaluation 500 (FGE.500): rum ether), koje se odnosi na ocjenu sigurnosti piroligninskog destilata [FL br. 21.001] kada se upotrebljava kao aroma pod kategorijom „ostale arome”. Taj je proizvod složena smjesa koju čini više od osamdeset pojedinačnih sastojaka. Agencija je zaključila da u skladu s općom strategijom procjene rizika aromatičnih tvari prisutnost genotoksičnih tvari kao sastojaka etera ruma predstavlja sigurnosni rizik. Navela je ozbiljne sigurnosne rizike koji se odnose na niz sastojaka kao što su furani i njihovi derivati te na druge sastojke povezane s genotoksičnošću i karcinogenošću, a spomenula je i druge rizike od karcinogenosti zbog prisutnosti etanola.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1253
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1253
correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 establishing a discard plan for certain demersal fisheries in South-Western waters
o izmjeni Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2016/2374 o uspostavi plana za odbačeni ulov za ribolov određenih pridnenih vrsta u jugozapadnim vodama
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC, and in particular Articles 15(6) and 18(1) and (3) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 1380/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. prosinca 2013. o zajedničkoj ribarstvenoj politici, izmjeni uredaba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1954/2003 i (EZ) br. 1224/2009 i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba Vijeća (EZ) br. 2371/2002 i (EZ) br. 639/2004 i Odluke Vijeća 2004/585/EZ, a posebno njezin članak 15. stavak 6. i članak 18. stavke 1. i 3.,
Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 aims to progressively eliminate discards in all Union fisheries through the introduction of a landing obligation for catches of species subject to catch limits.
Uredba (EU) br. 1380/2013 za cilj ima postupno napuštanje prakse odbacivanja ulova u svim vrstama ribolova Unije uvođenjem obveze iskrcavanja ulova za vrste koje podliježu ograničenjima ulova.
In order to implement the landing obligation, Article 15(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 empowers the Commission to adopt discard plans by means of a delegated act on the basis of joint recommendations developed by Member States in consultation with the relevant Advisory Councils.
U cilju provedbe obveze iskrcavanja Komisiji su člankom 15. stavkom 6. Uredbe (EU) br. 1380/2013 dodijeljene ovlasti za donošenje planova za odbačeni ulov delegiranim aktom na temelju zajedničkih preporuka koje izrađuju države članice uz savjetovanje s relevantnim savjetodavnim vijećima.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 established a discard plan for certain demersal fisheries in South-Western waters following a joint recommendation submitted by Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain (The South Western Waters Group) in 2016.
Na temelju zajedničke preporuke koju su 2016. dostavile Belgija, Francuska, Nizozemska, Portugal i Španjolska, i („Skupina jugozapadne vode”), Delegiranom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2016/2374 uspostavljen je plan za odbačeni ulov za ribolov određenih pridnenih vrsta u jugozapadnim vodama.
On 2 June 2017 Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain have submitted a new joint recommendation suggesting a number of amendments to the discard plan.
Belgija, Francuska, Nizozemska, Portugal i Španjolska dostavile su 2. lipnja 2017. novu zajedničku preporuku u kojoj predlažu niz izmjena plana za odbačeni ulov.
Based on that, the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/44 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374.
Na temelju toga Komisija je donijela Delegiranu uredbu (EU) 2018/44 o izmjeni Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2016/2374.
On 26 October 2017 the South Western Waters Group communicated to the Commission the existence of a textual error in the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/44 as regards the description of hake fisheries subject to the landing obligation.
Dana 26. listopada 2017. „Skupina jugozapadne vode” obavijestila je Komisiju o postojanju pogreške u tekstu u Prilogu Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2018/44 u opisu ribolova oslića koji podliježe obvezi iskrcavanja.
According to the current version of that Annex, hake fisheries carried out in ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Seas) divisions VIIIc and IXa with bottom trawls and seines are subject to the landing obligation if the total hake landings in the period 2014/2015 exceeded 5 % of all landed species and more than 5 metric tons.
Prema sadašnjoj verziji tog priloga ribolov oslića koji se provodi u zonama ICES-a (Međunarodno vijeće za istraživanje mora) VIII.c i IX.a pridnenim povlačnim mrežama (koćama) i mrežama potegačama podliježe obvezi iskrcavanja ako je ukupni iskrcani ulov oslića u razdoblju 2014.–2015. činio više od 5 % svih iskrcanih vrsta i više od 5 metričkih tona.
That condition however is no longer applicable.
Taj uvjet međutim više nije primjenjiv.
There is therefore a need to correct Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 as amended by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/44.
Delegiranu uredbu (EU) 2016/2374 kako je izmijenjena Delegiranom uredbom (EU) 2018/44 stoga je potrebno ispraviti.
Since the textual error in the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 has been introduced by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/44, and in order to avoid any discontinuity and legal uncertainty in the application of the landing obligation, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication and should apply retroactively from the date of application of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/44,
Budući da je pogreška u tekstu u Prilogu Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2016/2374 uvedena Delegiranom uredbom (EU) 2018/44 te kako bi se izbjegli diskontinuitet i pravna nesigurnost u primjeni obveze iskrcavanja, ova Uredba trebala bi stupiti na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave i trebala bi se primjenjivati retroaktivno od datuma primjene Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2018/44,
In the fourth column of the table ‘3. Hake (Merluccius merluccius) fisheries’ of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 the text:
U četvrtom stupcu tablice „3. Ribolov oslića (Merluccius merluccius)” u Prilogu Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2016/2374, tekst:
‘Vessels which fulfil the following cumulative criteria:
„Plovila koja ispunjavaju sve sljedeće kriterije:
Total hake landings in the period 2014/2015 (1) consist of: more than 5 % of all landed species and more than 5 metric tons.’
Ukupni iskrcani ulov oslića u razdoblju 2014. – 2015.
is replaced by the following:
čini: više od 5 % svih iskrcanih vrsta i više od 5 metričkih tona.”; zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
‘Use mesh size larger or equal to 70 mm’.
„Koriste se veličinom oka od 70 mm ili većom.”
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 of 12 October 2016 establishing a discard plan for certain demersal fisheries in South-Western waters (OJ L 352, 23.12.2016, p. 33.)
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2374 оd 12. listopada 2016. o uspostavi plana za odbačeni ulov za ribolov određenih pridnenih vrsta u jugozapadnim vodama (SL L 352, 23.12.2016., str. 33.).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/44 of 20 October 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2374 establishing a discard plan for certain demersal fisheries in South-Western waters (OJ L 7, 12.1.2018, p. 1.)
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/44 оd 20. listopada 2017. o izmjeni Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2016/2374 o uspostavi plana za odbačeni ulov za ribolov određenih pridnenih vrsta u jugozapadnim vodama (SL L 7, 12.1.2018., str. 1.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1254
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1254
concerning the denial of authorisation of riboflavin (80 %) produced by Bacillus subtilis KCCM-10445 as a feed additive belonging to the functional group of vitamins, pro-vitamins and chemically well-defined substances having similar effect
o uskraćivanju odobrenja riboflavina (80 %) dobivenog od Bacillus subtilis KCCM-10445 kao dodatka hrani za životinje koji pripada funkcionalnoj skupini vitamina, provitamina i kemijski točno definiranih tvari sličnog učinka
Riboflavin (vitamin B2) was authorised without a time limit by Directive 70/524/EEC as a feed additive belonging to the group of vitamins, pro-vitamins and chemically well-defined substances having similar effect, for all animal species.
Riboflavin (vitamin B2) odobren je bez vremenskog ograničenja u skladu s Direktivom 70/524/EEZ kao dodatak hrani za životinje koji pripada funkcionalnoj skupini vitamina, provitamina i kemijski točno definiranih tvari sličnog učinka za sve životinjske vrste.
In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 in conjunction with Article 7 thereof, an application was submitted for the authorisation of riboflavin, with a purity of minimum 80 %, produced by the genetically modified strain Bacillus subtilis KCCM-10445, as a feed additive for all animal species.
U skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003 u vezi s njezinim člankom 7., podnesen je zahtjev za odobrenje riboflavina minimalne čistoće od 80 %, dobivenog od genetski modificiranih sojeva Bacillus subtilis KCCM-10445, kao dodatka hrani za sve životinjske vrste.
The applicant requested that the additive be classified in the additive category ‘nutritional additives’.
Podnositelj zahtjeva zatražio je da se dodatak razvrsta u kategoriju dodataka „nutritivni dodaci”.
In 2010, in accordance with Article 7(3)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005, the applicant sent samples of the feed additive, in a form in which the feed additive was intended to be placed on the market, to the Reference Laboratory under Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 (‘the Reference Laboratory’).
Godine 2010., u skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 3. točkom (f) Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003 i člankom 3. Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 378/2005, podnositelj zahtjeva poslao je referentnom laboratoriju iz Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003 („referentni laboratorij”) uzorke dodatka hrani za životinje u obliku u kojem se namjeravao staviti na tržište.
In 2013, in accordance with Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 378/2005, the applicant supplied the Reference Laboratory with new samples to replace those expired.
Godine 2013., u skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 378/2005, podnositelj zahtjeva dostavio je referentnom laboratoriju nove uzorke kao zamjenu za one kojima je istekao rok.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 4 December 2013 that neither the production strain nor its recombinant DNA (‘rDNA’) was detected in the final product having regard to the information provided by the applicant and that therefore, the final product did not raise any safety concern with regard to the genetic modification of the production strain.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”) u svojem je mišljenju od 4. prosinca 2013. zaključila da proizvodni soj i njegova rekombinantna DNK („rDNK”) nisu otkriveni u konačnom proizvodu s obzirom na informacije koje je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva i da stoga za konačni proizvod nije utvrđen razlog za zabrinutost u vezi s genetskom modifikacijom proizvodnog soja.
It was also concluded that the additive did not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment.
Također je zaključeno da dodatak nema štetan učinak na zdravlje životinja, zdravlje ljudi ili na okoliš.
However, the Commission was informed by the Reference Laboratory that, in the context of an official control performed by a national competent authority, the presence of viable cells and of rDNA from the production strain was detected in some reference samples of the additive by a national laboratory competent for official controls.
Međutim, referentni laboratorij obavijestio je Komisiju da je, u kontekstu službene kontrole koju provodi nacionalno nadležno tijelo, nacionalni laboratorij nadležan za službene kontrole otkrio prisutnost živih stanica i rDNK iz proizvodnog soja u nekim referentnim uzorcima dodatka.
The Commission and the Reference Laboratory informed the applicant on those findings and gave him the opportunity to provide a suitable method of analysis both for the detection of rDNA and for the presence of viable cells from the production strain in order to proceed to further analysis of various samples of the additive.
Komisija i referentni laboratorij obavijestili su podnositelja zahtjeva o tim nalazima i dali mu mogućnost da osigura prikladnu metodu analize za otkrivanje rDNK i prisutnosti živih stanica iz proizvodnog soja kako bi se nastavilo s daljnjom analizom različitih uzoraka dodatka.
For that purpose, the applicant requested several laboratories, established both in China and in a Member State, to perform new analyses of the samples.
U tu je svrhu podnositelj zahtjeva zatražio od nekoliko laboratorija, osnovanih u Kini i u državi članici, provedbu novih analiza uzoraka.
The results of those analyses were negative as regards the detection of both rDNA and viable cells from the specific production strain.
Rezultati tih analiza bili su negativni u pogledu otkrivanja rDNK i živih stanica iz određenog proizvodnog soja.
However, it appeared that the new analyses carried out by the applicant did not concern the samples submitted in 2010 to the Reference Laboratory.
Međutim, činilo se da se nove analize koje je provodio podnositelj zahtjeva nisu odnosile na uzorke koji su 2010. dostavljeni referentnom laboratoriju.
In parallel, at the request of the Commission and the Reference Laboratory, further analyses of the samples of the additive were carried out by a national laboratory competent for official controls.
Istodobno su na zahtjev Komisije i referentnog laboratorija daljnje analize uzoraka dodatka proveli nacionalni laboratoriji nadležni za službene kontrole.
On its basis, it was concluded that viable cells from the production strain were present in the samples of 2010 and that rDNA from the production strain was present in the samples of 2010 and 2013.
Na temelju toga je zaključeno da su žive stanice iz proizvodnog soja bile prisutne u uzorcima iz 2010. i da je rDNK iz proizvodnog soja bio prisutan u uzorcima iz 2010. i 2013.