natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Additional Provision and Article 15(2) of the 1998 Postal Law lists the following services included within the scope of the universal postal service: (1) money order services; (2) the regular provision of national and international postal services for postal items that incorporate an address indicated by the sender on the item itself or on its packaging.
U Dodatnim odredbama i članku 15. stavku 2. Zakona o pošti iz 1998. navedene su sljedeće usluge koje su uključene u područje primjene univerzalnih poštanskih usluga: 1. usluge platnih naloga; 2. redovito pružanje nacionalnih i međunarodnih poštanskih usluga za poštanske pošiljke koje sadržavaju adresu koju je pošiljatelj naznačio na samoj pošiljci ili na pakiranju.
These might be: (a) Letters and postcards containing written communications, up to 2 kg; (b) Parcels, with or without economic value, up to 10 kg.
To mogu biti: (a) pisma i razglednice s pisanim tekstom, do 2 kg; (b) paketi, s novčanom vrijednošću ili bez nje, do 10 kg.
Article 18 of the 1998 Postal Law defines reserved area as the following: money order services; the clearance, sorting, transport and distribution of inter-city items, certified or not, and of letters and postcards, up to 100 grams (from 1 January 2006, the weight limit was set at 50 grams); the cross-border postal services (sent to or received from another State), including letters and postcards sent and received, with the above limitations in terms of price, weight and date; the receipt of applications, letters and communications that citizens addressed to the bodies of the public administration.
U članku 18. Zakona o pošti iz 1998. rezervirano područje definirano je na sljedeći način: usluge platnih naloga; prikupljanje, razvrstavanje, prijevoz i dostava međugradskih pošiljaka, preporučenih ili ne, i pisama i razglednica, do 100 grama (od 1. siječnja 2006. ograničenje težine iznosilo je 50 grama); prekogranične poštanske usluge (slanje u drugu državu ili zaprimanje iz druge države), uključujući poslana i zaprimljena pisma i razglednice, s prethodno navedenim ograničenjima u pogledu cijene, težine i datuma; zaprimanje zahtjeva, pisama i dopisa koje građani upućuju tijelima javne uprave.
Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the further opening to competition of Community postal services (OJ L 176, 5.7.2002, p. 21).
Direktiva 2002/39/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 10. lipnja 2002. o izmjeni Direktive 97/67/EZ u vezi s daljnjim otvaranjem tržišta poštanskih usluga u Zajednici (SL L 176, 5.7.2002., str. 21).
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH EU:C:2003:415.
Predmet C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg protiv Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH EU:C:2003:415.
Communication from the Commission: European Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 15).
Komunikacija Komisije: Okvir Europske unije za državne potpore u obliku naknade za javne usluge (SL C 8, 11.1.2012., str. 15.).
Final report on costing and financing of universal service obligations in the postal sector in the European Union, November 1998, National Economic Research Associates (NERA). http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/doc/studies/1998-nera_en.pdf
Konačno izvješće o utvrđivanju troška i financiranju obveze pružanja univerzalne usluge u poštanskom sektoru u Europskoj uniji, studeni 1998., National Economic Research Associates (NERA). http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/doc/studies/1998-nera_en.pdf
See Judgement of the Court of Justice of 16 March 2006, C-234/04, Kapferer, ECLI:EU:C:2006:178, paragraphs 20 and 21; Judgement of the Court of Justice of 6 October 2009, C40/08, Asturcom Telecomunicaciones, ECLI:EU:C: 2009:615; Judgement of the Court of Justice of 11 November 2015, C-505/14, Klausner Holz Niedersachsen, ECLI:EU:C:2015:742, paragraphs 36 and 45.
Vidjeti presudu Suda od 16. ožujka 2006., C-234/04, Kapferer, ECLI:EU:C:2006:178, točke 20. i 21. Presuda Suda od 6. listopada 2009., C40/08, Asturcom Telecomunicaciones, ECLI:EU:C: 2009:615; Presuda Suda od 11. studenoga 2015., C-505/14, Klausner Holz Niedersachsen, ECLI:EU:C:2015:742, točke 36. i 45.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of 3 July 2003, joint cases C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P and C-94/01 P, Chronopost/UFEX and others, ECLI:EU:C2003:388
Presuda Suda od 3. srpnja 2003., spojeni predmeti C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P i C-94/01 P, Chronopost/UFEX i ostali, ECLI:EU:C2003:388.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of 1 July 2008, joint cases C-341-06 and C-342/06P, Chronopost and La Poste/UFEX and others, ECLI:EU:C2008:375
Presuda Suda od 1. srpnja 2008., spojeni predmeti C-341/-06 P, C-342/01 P i C-342/06P, Chronopost i La Poste/UFEX i ostali, ECLI:EU:C2008:375.
Judgement of the Spanish Supreme Court of 2 October 2006, Rec. 89/2004.
Presuda španjolskog Vrhovnog suda od 2. listopada 2006., Rec. 89/2004.
Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3).
Odluka Komisije od 20. prosinca 2011. o primjeni članka 106. stavka 2. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije na državne potpore u obliku naknade za pružanje javnih usluga koje se dodjeljuju određenim poduzetnicima kojima je povjereno obavljanje usluga od općeg gospodarskog interesa (SL L 7, 11.1.2012., str. 3.).
The Commission notes that some of these issues do not appear to constitute State aid issues (e.g. alleged predatory pricing), that others do not seem to relate directly to Correos (e.g. alleged cross-subsidization of Correos express) and that the facts do not seem to be established regarding others (e.g. alleged compensation to finance Correos' publicity and communication campaigns).
Komisija napominje da se čini da neka od tih pitanja ne čine pitanja državne potpore (npr. navodne predatorske cijene), da se neka ne odnose izravno na društvo Correos (npr. navodno unakrsno subvencioniranje društva Correos express), a da za neka nisu utvrđene činjenice (npr. navodna naknada za financiranje promidžbene i komunikacijske kampanje društva Correos).
The anonymous party also refers to the increase of the scope of the USO by the 2010 Postal Law to parcels up to 20 kg as an indication of Correos interest in expanding its business in order to compete, taking advantage of its position as USO, with the rest of the parcels service companies in the Spanish parcels service market.
Anonimna osoba upućuje i da je povećanje područja primjene obveze pružanja univerzalne usluge u Zakonu o pošti iz 2010. na pakete do 20 kg naznaka interesa društva Correos da proširi svoje poslovanje kako bi se, zahvaljujući svojem položaju pružatelja univerzalne usluge, moglo natjecati na tržištu s ostalim trgovačkim društvima koje pružaju usluge dostave paketa na španjolskom tržištu usluga dostave paketa.
The Commission will assess the USO compensations to Correos under the 2010 Postal Law in another decision (see recital 32).
Komisija će naknadu za obvezu pružanja univerzalne usluge društvu Correos u skladu sa Zakonom o pošti iz 2010. procijeniti u drugoj odluci (vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 32.).
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Predmet C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH i Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg protiv Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
See Commission Decision 2009/554/EC of 21 October 2008 on a State aid scheme implemented by Italy to renumerate Poste Italiane for distributing postal savings certificates (C 49/06 (ex NN 65/06)) (OJ L 189, 21.7.2009, p. 3).
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije 2009/554/EZ od 21. listopada 2008. u predmetu SA.20461 (C49/2006(ex NN 65/06)) – Poste Italiane (SL L 189, 21.7.2009., str. 3.).
Case T-613/97, Ufex and Others v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2006:150
Predmet T-613/97, Ufex i ostali protiv Komisije, ECLI:EU:T:2006:150.
Published by the Commission on 18 February 2013 (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/new_guide_eu_rules_procurement_en.pdf)
Komisija ga je objavila 18. veljače 2013. (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/new_guide_eu_rules_procurement_en.pdf).
Commission Decision 2012/321/EU of 25 January 2012, on the measure SA.14588(C20/09) implemented by Belgium in favour of De Post – La Poste (now bpost) (OJ L 170, 29.6.2012, p. 1).
Odluka Komisije 2012/321/EU od 25. siječnja 2012. o mjeri SA.14588(C20/2009) koju je provela Belgija u korist društva De Post – La Poste (sada bpost) (SL L 170, 29.6.2012., str. 1.).
See for instance Commission Decision of 28 March 2012 in case SA.33054 (2012/N) — Compensation for net costs incurred to keep a non-commercially viable network for the period 2012-2015 and the continuation of a working capital facility (OJ C 121, 26.4.2012, p. 1) and Commission Decision 2012/636/EU of 25 January 2012 Measures C36/07 (ex NN 25/07) implemented by Germany for Deutsche Post AG (OJ L 289, 19.10.2012, p. 1).
Vidjeti, primjerice, Odluku Komisije od 28. ožujka 2012. u predmetu SA.33054 (2012/N) – Naknada za neto troškove nastale radi zadržavanja mreže koja nije tržišno održiva u razdoblju od 2012. do 2015. i nastavak instrumenta radnog kapitala (SL C 121, 26.4.2012., str. 1.), i Odluku Komisije 2012/636/EU od 25. siječnja 2012. o mjeri C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) koju je provela Njemačka za društvo Deutsche Post AG (SL L 289, 19.10.2012., str. 1.).
Case C-124/10 P, Commission v EDF, ECLU:EU:C:2012:318.
Predmet C-124/10 P, Komisija protiv ERF-a, ECLU:EU:C:2012:318.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of 3 July 2003, joint cases C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P and C-94/01 P, Chronopost/UFEX and others, ECLI:EU:C2003:388.
Presuda Suda od 3. srpnja 2003., spojeni predmeti C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P i C-94/01 P, Chronopost/UFEX i ostali, ECLI:EU:C2003:388.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of 1 July 2008, joint cases C-341-06 and C-342/06P, Chronopost and La Poste/UFEX and others, ECLI:EU:C2008:375.
Presuda Suda od 1. srpnja 2008., spojeni predmeti C-341/-06 P, C-342/01 P i C-342/06P, Chronopost i La Poste/UFEX i ostali, ECLI:EU:C2008:375.
Commission Decision 98/365/EC of 1 October 1997 concerning alleged State aid granted by France to SMFI-Chronopost (OJ L 164, 9.6.1998, p. 37).
Odluka Komisije 98/365/EZ od 1. listopada 1997. od navodnoj državnoj potpori koju je Francuska dodijelila društvu SMFI-Chronopost (SL L 164, 9.6.1998., str. 37.).
Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia: the CNMC will adopt resolutions once the net cost of the universal postal service and the unfair burden has been established for these different years.
Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia: CNMC će donijeti odluke kada budu utvrđeni neto trošak pružanja univerzalne poštanske usluge i nepošteno opterećenjeza te različite godine.
C-460/07, Sandra Puffer v Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz, ECLI:EU:C:2009:254
C-460/07, Sandra Puffer protiv Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz, ECLI:EU:C:2009:254.
Commission Decision 2011/3/EU of 24 February 2010 concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (Case 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (OJ L 7, 11.1.2011, p. 1).
Odluka Komisije 2011/3/EU od 24. veljače 2010. o ugovorima o javnim uslugama prijevoza između danskog ministarstva prometa i Danske Statsbaner (Državna potpora C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (SL L 7, 11.1.2011., str. 1.).
The cost allocation methodology consists in calculating the net cost of a public service obligation such as the USO) as the costs incurred minus the revenues obtained when discharging the public service obligations.
Prema metodologiji raspodjele troškova neto trošak obveze pružanja javne usluge kao što je USO razlika je između nastalih troškova i prihoda ostvarenih izvršavanjem obveze pružanja javne usluge.
Under the cost allocation methodology, a reasonable profit can be added to that net cost to calculate the maximum amount of allowable compensation.
U skladu s metodologijom raspodjele troškova, tom neto trošku može se dodati razumna dobit kako bi se izračunao najveći iznos dopuštene naknade.
The Return on Sales is a profitability measure, also known as operating profit margin.
Povrat na prodaju je mjera profitabilnosti koja se naziva još i marža operativne dobiti.
It is calculated as the ratio between net operating profit (before interest and tax) and sales revenues.
Izračunava se kao omjer između neto operativne dobiti (prije kamata i poreza) i prihoda od prodaje.
More precisely, net operating profit is the difference between revenues and costs at operational level.
Drugim riječima, neto operativna dobit je razlika između prihoda i troškova na operativnoj razini.
Case T-358/94 Compagnie nationale Air France v Commission of the European Communities EU:T:1996:194, paragraph 56.
Predmet T-358/94 Compagnie nationale Air France protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:1996:194, točka 56.
Case 248/84 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities EU:C:1987:437, paragraph 17; and Joined Cases T-92/00 and T-103/00 Territorio Histórico de Álava — Diputación Foral de Álava (T-92/00), Ramondín, SA and Ramondín Cápsulas, SA (T-103/00) v Commission of the European Communities EU:T:2002:61, paragraph 57.
Predmet 248/84 Savezna Republika Njemačka protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, EU:C:1987:437, točka 17.; i spojeni predmeti T-92/00 i T-103/00 Territorio Histórico de Álava - Diputación Foral de Álava (T-92/00), Ramondín, SA i Ramondín Cápsulas, SA (T-103/00) protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:2002:61, točka 57.
Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavel Pavlov and Others v Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten EU:C:2000:428, paragraph 74.
Spojeni predmeti C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavel Pavlov i ostali protiv Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten EU:C:2000:428, točka 74.
Case C-41/90 Höfner & Fritz Elser v Macrotron GmbH EU:C:1991:161, paragraph 21 and Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavel Pavlov and Others v Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten EU:C:2000:428, paragraph 74.
Predmet C-41/90 Höfner & Fritz Elser protiv Macrotron GmbH EU:C:1991:161, točka 21. i spojeni predmeti od C-180/98 do C-184/98 Pavel Pavlov i ostali protiv Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten EU:C:2000:428, točka 74.
Case C-118/85 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic EU:C:1987:283, paragraph 7.
Predmet C-118/85 Komisija Europskih zajednica protiv Talijanske Republike EU:C:1987:283, točka 7.
Case C-82/01 P Aéroports de Paris v Commission of the European Communities EU:C:2002:617, paragraph 74; and Case C-49/07 Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) v Elliniko Dimosio EU:C:2008:376, paragraph 25.
Predmet C-82/01 P Aéroports de Pariz protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, EU:C:2002:617, točka 74.; i predmet C-49/07 Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) protiv Elliniko Dimosio EU:C:2008:376, točka 25.
See also Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (2012/C 8/02), paragraph 9.
Vidjeti i Komunikaciju Komisije o primjeni pravila o državnim potporama Europske unije na naknadu koja se dodjeljuje za obavljanje usluga od općeg gospodarskog interesa, (2012/C 8/02), točka 9.
Case C-49/07 Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) v Elliniko Dimosio EU:C:2008:376, paragraph 27; and Case C-244/94 Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurance, Société Paternelle-Vie, Union des Assurances de Paris-Vie and Caisse d'Assurance et de Prévoyance Mutuelle des Agriculteurs v Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche EU:C:1995:392, paragraph 21.
Predmet C-49/07 Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) protiv Elliniko Dimosio EU:C:2008:376, točka 27.; i predmet C-244/94 Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurance, Société Paternelle-Vie, Union des Assurances de Pariz-Vie i Caisse d'Assurance et de Prévoyance Mutuelle des Agriculteurs protiv Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche EU:C:1995:392, točka 21.
Case C-39/94 Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others EU:C:1996:285, paragraph 60; and Case C-342/96 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities EU:C:1999:210, paragraph 41.
Predmet C-39/94 Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) i ostali protiv La Poste i ostali EU:C:1996:285, točka 60. i predmet C-342/96 Kraljevina Španjolska protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:C:1999:210, točka 41.
Case C-173/73 Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities EU:C:1974:71, paragraph 13.
Predmet C-173/73 Talijanska Republika protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:C:1974:71, točka 13.
See paragraphs 71-82 of the 2016 Opening Decision.
Vidjeti točke od 71. do 82. Odluke o pokretanju postupka iz 2016.
See recitals 296-320 of Decision 2012/321/EU.
Vidjeti uvodne izjave od 296. do 320. Odluke 2012/321/EU.
In the case of bpost a reasonable profit level of 4,8 % was applied for the years 2004 and 2005 and of 7,4 % ROS for the years 2006-2010.
U slučaju bposta primijenjena je razumna razina dobiti od 4,8 % za 2004. i 2005. godinu i od 7,4 % ROS za godine od 2006. do 2010.
On the basis of these reasonable profit levels the Commission concluded that bpost had been overcompensated which led to the recovery of EUR 417 million (see http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-45_en.htm).
Na temelju tih razumnih razina dobiti Komisija je zaključila da je društvu bpost isplaćena prekomjerna naknada na temelju čega je izvršen povrat 417 milijuna EUR (vidjeti http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-45_en.htm)
Given that the comments of the Spanish State and Correos are very convergent, the Commission will refer to comments made by the Spanish authorities and/or Correos in the following of the document.
Budući da su primjedbe Španjolske i društva Correos slične, Komisija će dalje u dokumentu upućivati na primjedbe španjolskih nadležnih tijela i/ili društva Correos.
In most cases, the same comment is made by both parties.
U većini slučajeva obje strane iznijele su istu primjedbu.
In some cases, it is only made by one of them.
U nekim slučajevima primjedbu je dala samo jedna strana.
Communication from the Commission: European framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (2005) (OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4).
Komunikacija Komisije: Okvir Europske unije za državne potpore u obliku naknade za javne usluge (2005.) (SL C 297, 29.11.2005., str. 4.).
See in particular Decision 2012/321/EU and Decision 2012/636/EU.
Vidjeti posebno Odluku 2012/321/EU i Odluku 2012/636/EU.
As for example described in the Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Postal Services Directive and in particular the Annex on the calculation of the net cost of the postal universal service obligation.
Kako je, primjerice, opisano u Radnom dokumentu službi Komisije uz Izvješće Komisije Europskom parlamentu i Vijeću o primjeni Direktive o poštanskim uslugama, a posebno u Prilogu o izračunu neto troška obveze pružanja univerzalne usluge.
Further guidance can be found in the Commission's State aid decision practice since 2012.
Dodatne smjernice dostupne su u Komisijinoj praksi odluka o državnim potporama od 2012.
Case C-471/09 P Diputación Foral de Vizcaya and Others v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2011:521, paragraph 65.
Predmet C-471/09 P Diputación Foral de Vizcaya i ostali protiv Komisije, ECLI:EU:C:2011:521, točka 65.
Press releases, publication of decisions on its website.
Priopćenja za tisak, objava odluka na njezinu web-mjestu.
E.g. Hellenic Post, Poste Italiane.
Npr. Hellenic Post, Poste Italiane.
See Commission Decision of 20 November 2012 in Case SA.33989 (2012/NN) implemented by Italy in favour of Poste Italiane (OJ C 77, 15.3.2013, p. 12) and Commission Decision in Case SA.35608 (2014/C) implemented by Greece in favour of Hellenic Post (ELTA).
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 20. studenoga 2012. u predmetu SA.33989 (2012/NN) koju je provela Italija u korist društva Poste Italiane (SL C 77, 15.3.2013., str. 12.) i Odluku Komisije u predmetu SA.35608 (2014/C) koju je provela Grčka u korist društva Hellenic Post (ELTA).
See paragraph 50 of the Commission Decision in Case SA.33989 (2012/NN) implemented by Italy in favour of Poste Italiane.
Vidjeti stavak 50. Odluke Komisije u predmetu SA.33989 (2012/NN) koju je Italija provela u korist društva Poste Italiane.
Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities EU:C:1980:209, paragraph 11; and Joined cases T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 to 607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 to T-6/98 and T-23/98 Alzetta Mauro and others v Commission of the European Communities EU:T:2000:151, paragraph 80.
Predmet 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:C:1980:209, točka 11.; i spojeni predmeti T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 do 607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 do T-6/98 i T-23/98 Alzetta Mauro i ostali protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:2000:151, točka 80.
Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities, EU:C:1980:209 paragraphs 11 and 12; and Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flemish Region) v Commission of the European Communities EU:T:1998:77, paragraphs 48-50.
Predmet 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, EU:C:1980:209 točke 11. i 12. i predmet T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flamanska regija) protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:1998:77, točke 48. – 50.
Case C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances EU:C:1994:311, paragraphs 28 and 35.
Predmet C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances EU:C:1994:311, točke 28. i 35.
See Joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01 Government of Gibraltar v Commission EU:T:2002:111, paragraph 111.
Vidjeti spojene predmete T-195/01 i T-207/01 Vlada Gibraltara protiv Komisije EU:T:2002:111, točka 111.
According to article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1), modifications of a purely formal or administrative nature which cannot affect the evaluation of the compatibility of the aid measure with the common market as well as an increase in the original budget of an existing aid scheme by up to 20 % shall not be considered an alteration to existing aid.
U skladu s člankom 4. Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 794/2004 od 21. travnja 2004. o provedbi Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za primjenu članka 108. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 140, 30.4.2004., str. 1.), izmjene formalne ili administrativne prirode koje ne mogu utjecati na evaluaciju spojivosti mjere potpore sa zajedničkim tržištem i povećanje izvornog proračuna postojeće mjere potpore za do 20 % ne smatraju se izmjenom postojeće potpore.
For example, if the USO services were loss making but overall the company was profit making, no compensation was to be granted while some could be granted after the change.
Na primjer, ako se uslugama obuhvaćenima obvezom univerzalne usluge ostvaruju gubici, ali trgovačko društvo ostvaruje dobit, nije se odobravala naknada, dok se nakon izmjene može dodijeliti nekakva naknada.
Alternatively, if the company would be loss-making overall with a very profitable USO, it could receive compensation.
S druge strane, trgovačko društvo moglo bi dobiti naknadu ako bi općenito ostvarivalo gubitke iako je obveza pružanja univerzalne usluge profitabilna.
Decision 2012/21/EU.
Odluka 2012/21/EU.
Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, (OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4).
Okvir Zajednice za državnu potporu u obliku naknade za javne usluge (SL C 297, 29.11.2005., str. 4.).
See paragraph 11 of the 2012 SGEI Framework.
Vidjeti stavak 11. Okvira za usluge od općeg gospodarskog interesa iz 2012.
See recital 28.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 28.