natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As demonstrated in recitals (26) to (30), the provisional sample was changed further to comments from interested parties.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama od 26. do 30., privremeni uzorak promijenjen je na temelju primjedbi zainteresiranih strana.
In addition, it requested the authorities of the PRC to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Osim toga, zatražila je od nadležnih tijela NRK-a da utvrde ostale proizvođače izvoznike, ako takvi postoje, koji bi mogli biti zainteresirani za sudjelovanje u ispitnom postupku i/ili da s njima stupe u kontakt.
44 exporting producers/group(s) of exporting producers in the country concerned provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Ukupno je 44 proizvođača izvoznika/grupa proizvođača izvoznika u predmetnoj zemlji dostavilo zatražene informacije i pristalo da ih se uključi u uzorak.
In accordance with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the following sample of four groups of exporting producers on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available:
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 1. točkom (b) osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala sljedeći uzorak od četiriju grupa proizvođača izvoznika na temelju najvećeg reprezentativnog obujma izvoza u Uniju koji bi se razumno mogao ispitati u raspoloživom vremenu:
China National Tire Group, China;
Grupa China National Tire, Kina,
Giti Group, China;
Giti Group, Kina,
Hankook Group, China;
Hankook Group, Kina,
Xingyuan Group, China.
Xingyuan Group, Kina.
The sampled groups of exporting producers represented more than 50 % of the total imports of the product concerned to the Union.
Grupe proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku činile su više od 50 % ukupnog uvoza predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the GOC, were consulted on the selection of the sample.
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe provedeno je savjetovanje o odabiru uzorka sa svim poznatim proizvođačima izvoznicima na koje se postupak odnosi te s kineskom vladom.
Comments on the proposed sample were received from the European Retreading Association (‘BIPAVER’), which claimed that the finally selected sample could lead to a strong imbalance in the product mix between tier 2 and tier 3 tyres.
Zaprimljene su primjedbe Europskog udruženja proizvođača protektiranih guma („BIPAVER”), koje je tvrdilo da konačno odabrani uzorak može prouzročiti velike neravnoteže u ponudi proizvoda između guma 2. i 3. razine.
In their view, the average import prices might not accurately reflect the part of import volumes that are most harmful to the Union industry.
Smatrali su da se u prosječnim uvoznim cijenama ne mora točno odražavati dio obujmova uvoza koji su najštetniji za industriju Unije.
Therefore, they urged the Commission to reassess and amend the sample.
Stoga su od Komisije zatražili da ponovno procijeni i izmijeni uzorak.
The Commission assessed whether it would be practically feasible to further enlarge the sample.
Komisija je procijenila bi li se dodatno povećanje uzorka moglo provesti u praksi.
It pointed out that the groups of exporting producers selected in the sample consisted of: (1) 13 legal entities that were involved in the production and domestic sales of the product concerned; (2) two related exporters located outside of the Union; and (3) more than ten related importers located in the Union.
Istaknula je da se grupe proizvođača izvoznika odabrane u uzorku sastoje od: 1. 13 pravnih subjekata uključenih u proizvodnju i domaću prodaju predmetnog proizvoda; 2. dvaju povezanih izvoznika sa sjedištem izvan Unije; i 3. više od deset povezanih uvoznika sa sjedištem u Uniji.
The data provided by each of these entities needed to be processed and verified.
Bilo je potrebno obraditi i provjeriti podatke koje je dostavio svaki od tih subjekata.
Therefore, the Commission considered that more exporting producers could not be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da u raspoloživom vremenu ne bi mogla u razumnoj mjeri ispitati veći broj proizvođača izvoznika.
BIPAVER also considered that two of the sampled companies were not representative recipients of countervailable subsidies because they have their headquarters and some production facilities outside of the PRC.
BIPAVER je smatrao i da dva društva u uzorku nisu reprezentativni primatelji subvencija protiv kojih se mogu uvesti kompenzacijske mjere jer im se sjedišta i dio proizvodnih postrojenja nalaze izvan NRK-a.
The Commission noted that the fact that an individual company might not have received directly a specific type of alleged subsidy did not render the sample non-representative, as the purpose of the sample was to represent the overall tyres industry in the PRC with regard to eligibility for all types of alleged subsidies.
Komisija je napomenula da činjenica da pojedinačno društvo možda nije izravno dobilo posebnu vrstu navodne subvencije ne čini uzorak nereprezentativnim jer je svrha uzorka predstavljati cjelokupnu industriju guma u NRK-u s obzirom na prihvatljivost za sve vrste navodnih subvencija.
The four sampled groups of exporting producers were representative in terms of eligibility for the subsidies alleged in the complaint.
Četiri grupe proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku bile su reprezentativne u smislu prihvatljivosti za subvencije navedene u pritužbi.
Hence, the Commission considered that the selected sample represents a proper basis to examine the existence and the extent of the alleged subsidisation.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da odabrani uzorak predstavlja odgovarajuću osnovu za ispitivanje postojanja i opsega navodnog subvencioniranja.
The proposed sample hence complies with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Predloženi uzorak stoga je u skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 1. točkom (b) osnovne uredbe.
In addition to the four sampled exporting producers, six exporting producers declared that, in the event that they are not selected to be in the sample, they would like to receive a questionnaire and other claim forms in order to claim an individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Osim tih četiriju proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku, šest je proizvođača izvoznika izjavilo da bi, ako ne budu odabrani u uzorak, željeli primiti upitnik i druge obrasce zahtjeva kako bi podnijeli zahtjev za pojedinačno ispitivanje na temelju članka 27. stavka 3. osnovne uredbe.
As requested, the Commission sent questionnaires to these six exporting producers.
U skladu sa zahtjevom Komisija je poslala upitnike na adrese tih šest proizvođača izvoznika.
However, none of them replied to the questionnaire.
Međutim, nijedan od njih nije odgovorio na te upitnike.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the four sampled Chinese exporting producers; the non-sampled exporting producers as well as the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je poslala upitnike na adrese četiriju kineskih proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku, proizvođača izvoznika koji nisu odabrani u uzorak te proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku.
None of the non-sampled exporting producers sent a reply to the questionnaires.
Nijedan od proizvođača izvoznika koji nisu odabrani u uzorak nije poslao odgovor na upitnike.
A questionnaire was also sent to the GOC.
Upitnik je poslan i kineskoj vladi.
It included specific questionnaires for the China Development Bank (‘CDB’), Export Import Bank of China (‘EXIM’), Agricultural Bank of China (‘ABC’), Bank of China (‘BOC’), and the Chinese Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (‘Sinosure’).
Obuhvaćao je posebne upitnike za Kinesku razvojnu banku („CDB”), Kinesku izvozno-uvoznu banku („EXIM”), Poljoprivrednu banku Kine („ABC”), Banku Kine („BOC”) te Kinesko društvo za osiguranje izvoza i kredita („Sinosure”).
Those financial institutions had been specifically referred to in the complaint as public bodies or bodies directed and entrusted granting subsidies.
Te financijske institucije posebno su navedene u pritužbi kao javna tijela ili tijela koja upravljaju dodjelom subvencija i nadležna su za nju.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward the specific questionnaire for financial institutions to any other financial institution that provided loans or export credits to the sampled companies, or to the buyers of the sampled companies.
Osim toga, kineska vlada pozvana je da taj posebni upitnik za financijske institucije proslijedi svim drugim financijskim institucijama koje su davale kredite ili izvozne kredite društvima u uzorku ili kupcima društava u uzorku.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these financial institutions and to send them directly to the Commission.
Od kineske vlade zatraženo je i da prikupi sve odgovore koje te financijske institucije dostave te da ih izravno pošalje Komisiji.
Furthermore, the questionnaire for the GOC included specific questionnaires for those producers of natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black and nylon cord which, according to the complaint, provided inputs at less than adequate remuneration to the sampled companies, i.e. Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd and Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
Nadalje, upitnik za kinesku vladu obuhvaćao je posebne upitnike za one proizvođače prirodnog kaučuka, sintetičkog kaučuka, ugljene čađe i najlonske kordne niti koji su, prema navodima iz pritužbe, društva u uzorku opskrbljivali ulaznim materijalima uz neprimjereno nisku naknadu, tj. za društva Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd i Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward that specific questionnaire to all other producers and distributors of the raw materials in question which had provided inputs to the sampled companies.
Osim toga, od kineske vlade zatraženo je da taj posebni upitnik proslijedi svim ostalim proizvođačima i distributerima predmetnih sirovina koji su društva u uzorku opskrbljivali ulaznim materijalima.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these producers and to send them directly to the Commission.
Od kineske vlade zatraženo je i da prikupi sve odgovore koje ti proizvođači dostave te da ih izravno pošalje Komisiji.
The Commission received questionnaire replies from the GOC, which included replies to the specific questionnaire from EXIM, BOC, ABC and Sinosure.
Komisija je od kineske vlade primila odgovore na upitnik koji su uključivali odgovore na posebni upitnik dobivene od EXIM-a, BOC-a, ABC-a i društva Sinosure.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidy, injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zatražila i provjerila sve informacije koje je smatrala neophodnima za utvrđivanje subvencije, štete i interesa Unije.
A verification visit took place at the premises of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, during which officials from other relevant ministries also participated.
U prostorima kineskog ministarstva trgovine obavljen je posjet radi provjere tijekom kojeg su sudjelovali i dužnosnici drugih relevantnih ministarstava.
Moreover, representatives from the following financial institutions were present during this verification visit;
Osim toga, tijekom tog posjeta radi provjere bili su prisutni i predstavnici sljedećih financijskih institucija:
Agricultural Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Poljoprivredna banka Kine, Peking, Kina,
Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Banka Kine, Peking, Kina,
Sinosure, Beijing, China.
Sinosure, Peking, Kina.
Moreover, verification visits pursuant to Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Osim toga, posjeti radi provjere u skladu s člankom 26. osnovne uredbe obavljeni su u prostorima sljedećih društava:
Sampled Union producers
proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poland;
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poljska,
Wetest, Czech Republic;
Wetest, Češka,
Pneumatici, Italy;
Pneumatici, Italija,
Banden plant, the Netherlands;
postrojenje Banden, Nizozemska,
Marangoni SpA Ltd Italy;
Marangoni SpA Ltd. Italija,
Roline N.V., the Netherlands;
Roline N.V., Nizozemska,
four Union producers which requested confidentiality.
četiri proizvođača iz Unije koja su zatražila povjerljivost;
Sampled unrelated importers in the Union
nepovezani uvoznici iz Unije u uzorku
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, the Netherlands;
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, Nizozemska,
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Germany.
društvo Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Njemačka;
Sampled producers in the PRC
proizvođači iz NRK-a u uzorku
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, NRK,
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Beijing, PRC;
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Peking, NRK,
Chemchina Corporation, Beijing, PRC;
Chemchina Corporation, Peking, NRK,
Chemchina Finance, Beijing, PRC;
Chemchina Finance, Peking, NRK,
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd., Peking, NRK,
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd, Taiyuan, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd., Taiyuan, NRK,
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd., Peking, NRK,
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, NRK,
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd:, Jining, PRC;
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd.:, Jining, NRK,
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC;
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd., Jining, NRK,
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd., Qingdao, NRK,
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd., Qingdao, NRK,
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., Jining, NRK;
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Shanghai, PRC;
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Šangaj, NRK,
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd., Hefei, NRK,
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd., Hefei, NRK,
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd., Hefei, NRK,
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd, Hualin, PRC;
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd., Hualin, NRK,
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd, Fujian, PRC;
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd., Fujian, NRK,
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, NRK,
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, NRK,
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd., Chongqing, NRK,
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd, Hubei, PRC;
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd., Hubei, NRK,
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd., Šangaj, NRK,
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC.
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd., Šangaj, NRK;
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd., Šangaj, NRK,
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Chongqing, NRK,
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Jiangsu, PRC;
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Jiangsu, NRK;
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, NRK,
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, NRK,
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, NRK,
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd, Dongying, PRC.
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd., Dongying, NRK.
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
Neuvođenje privremenih mjera i daljnji postupak
Given that it had imposed provisional measures in the parallel anti-dumping case in May 2018, the Commission decided not to impose provisional measures in the present case.
Budući da je u svibnju 2018. uvela privremene mjere dok je trajao usporedni antidampinški predmet, Komisija je u ovom predmetu odlučila da neće uvesti privremene mjere.
On 13 July 2018, all interested parties received an Information Document describing the Commission's preliminary findings on the alleged subsidy schemes and the Commission's preliminary conclusions as far as injury, causation and Union interest were concerned, as set out in the provisional anti-dumping Regulation.
Sve zainteresirane strane primile su 13. srpnja 2018. dokument s informacijama u kojem su navedeni preliminarni nalazi Komisije o navodnim programima subvencija i preliminarni zaključci Komisije u pogledu štete, uzročnosti i interesa Unije, kako je utvrđeno u Privremenoj antidampinškoj uredbi.
Several interested parties made written submissions on the information document.
Nekoliko zainteresiranih strana dostavilo je pisane podneske o dokumentu s informacijama.
Following the disclosure of the Information Document, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd claimed that it should not be considered as a related company of China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd (‘CNRC’).
Nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. tvrdilo je da ga ne bi trebalo smatrati povezanim društvom društva China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd. („CNRC”).
In this sense, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd disagreed with the application of Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 (the ‘Union Customs Code’) for the purpose of calculating a weighted average amount of subsidisation for related companies.
U tom se smislu društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. nije složilo s primjenom članka 127. Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 o Carinskom zakoniku Unije („Carinski zakonik Unije”) za izračun ponderiranog prosječnog iznosa subvencioniranja za povezana društva.
Instead, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd referred to the definition of Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement, which requires control of one company over another, in order to establish the relation between companies.
Umjesto toga društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. uputilo je na definiciju iz članka 16. Sporazuma o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama, prema kojem jedno društvo mora kontrolirati drugo društvo da bi ona bila povezana.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd then argued that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd would not qualify as a related company under this standard, as it was allegedly not controlled by CNRC.
Zatim je tvrdilo da se prema toj normi društvo Pirelly Tyre Co. Ltd. ne može smatrati povezanim društvom jer ga navodno ne kontrolira CNRC.
In addition, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd noted that the basic Regulation did not make any reference to the Union Customs Code.
Osim toga, primijetilo je da se u osnovnoj uredbi nigdje ne upućuje na Carinski zakonik Unije.
The Commission recalled that Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement is mirrored in Article 9(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je podsjetila na članak 16. Sporazuma o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama koji odgovara članku 9. stavku 2. osnovne uredbe.
However, both articles refer only to the definition of the Union industry and the relationship of Union producers to exporting producers.
Međutim, u oba se članka upućuje samo na definiciju industrije Unije i odnos proizvođača iz Unije i proizvođača izvoznika.
In that context, a Union producer may be taken from the definition of the Union industry if it is controlled by an exporting producer.
U tom se kontekstu proizvođač iz Unije može izuzeti iz definicije industrije Unije ako ga kontrolira proizvođač izvoznik.
In contrast, both the ASCM Agreement and the basic Regulation are silent about the method how to assess the relationship between exporting producers for the purpose of establishing the amount of subsidisation.
Nasuprot tome, ni u Sporazumu o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama ni u osnovnoj uredbi ne spominje se način ocjenjivanja odnosa među proizvođačima izvoznicima za potrebe utvrđivanja iznosa subvencioniranja.
In order to ensure that measures can be enforced effectively, particularly to avoid channelling exports through a related company with the lowest duty, it is the Commission's practice to establish the relationship between exporting producers through the criteria laid down in Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015.
Kako bi se osigurala djelotvorna provedba mjera, a posebno kako bi se izbjeglo preusmjeravanje izvoza preko povezanog društva s najnižom pristojbom, Komisija u svojoj praksi utvrđuje odnos među proizvođačima izvoznicima na temelju kriterija iz članka 127. Provedene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 od 24. studenoga 2015. o Carinskom zakoniku Unije.
This was clearly communicated to all parties in the Notice of initiation at the start of the proceeding.
To je nedvosmisleno priopćeno svim strankama u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka na njegovu početku.
In addition, reference to Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementation Act is explicitly contained in Article 2(1) of the basic Anti-dumping Regulation and the Commission should have the same treatment of parties in both anti-dumping and anti-subsidy cases.
Osim toga, upućivanje na članak 127. Provedbene uredbe o Carinskom zakoniku Unije izričito je sadržano u članku 2. stavku 1. osnovne antidampinške uredbe i Komisija bi trebala postupati na isti način sa strankama u antidampinškim predmetima i strankama u antisubvencijskim predmetima.
As of today, it still holds 46 % of the shares.
Trenutačno i dalje drži 46 % dionica.
Therefore, in the context of this investigation, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd and CNRC are considered to be related.
Stoga se u kontekstu ovog ispitnog postupka smatra da su društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. i CNRC međusobno povezani.
The claim was thus rejected.
Stoga je tvrdnja odbačena.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd also commented that it should be considered only as a cooperating party, and not as an exporting producer, since the company stopped the production of the product concerned in November 2017.
Društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. dostavilo je i primjedbu da bi se ono trebalo smatrati samo stranom koja surađuje, a ne proizvođačem izvoznikom, s obzirom na to da je društvo prestalo s proizvodnjom predmetnog proizvoda u studenome 2017.
The Commission established that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd was an exporting producer during the entire investigation period.
Komisija je utvrdila da je društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. bilo proizvođač izvoznik tijekom cijelog razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
The fact that subsequently the company ceased the production does not alter the result of the investigation.
Činjenica da je društvo kasnije prestalo s proizvodnjom ne mijenja rezultate ispitnog postupka.
Following final disclosure Pirelli reiterated its claim that it functions independently from the China National Tire Group.
Nakon konačne objave društvo Pirelli ponovilo je svoju tvrdnju da djeluje neovisno o Grupi China National Tire.
However, none of the claims was substantiated with additional evidence.
Međutim, nijedna tvrdnja nije potkrijepljena dodatnim dokazima.
In particular, Pirelli did not contest the ownership structure described by the Commission in annex 2 of its final disclosure.
Konkretno, društvo Pirelli nije osporilo vlasničku strukturu koju je Komisija opisala u Prilogu 2. konačnoj objavi.
The Commission continued seeking and verifying all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je nastavila prikupljati i provjeravati sve informacije koje je smatrala potrebnima za donošenje svojih konačnih nalaza.
Given that the injury period and the investigation period are the same as in the parallel anti-dumping investigation, the Commission informed, on 1 June 2018, interested parties that the information and comments submitted concerning injury in the framework of the anti-dumping investigation were also going to be taken into account for this investigation.
S obzirom na to da su razdoblje štete i razdoblje ispitnog postupka jednaki kao u usporednom antidampinškom ispitnom postupku Komisija je 1. lipnja 2018. obavijestila zainteresirane strane da će informacije i primjedbe o šteti dostavljene u okviru antidampinškog ispitnog postupka uzeti u obzir i u ovom ispitnom postupku.