natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
None of the parties opposed to this approach.
Nijedna se strana nije protivila tom pristupu.
In the parallel anti-dumping investigation parties received, on 24 July 2018, final disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Sve stranke u usporednom antidampinškom ispitnom postupku primile su 24. srpnja 2018. konačnu objavnu o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih Komisija namjerava uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
Furthermore interested parties received an additional disclosure on 10 September 2018.
Nadalje, 10. rujna 2018. zainteresirane strane primile su dodatnu objavu.
As described in recital (60) above the comments submitted in the framework of those disclosures were in so far they concerned injury, causation and Union interest fully considered in this investigation and, where appropriate, taken into account and reflected in the findings of this investigation.
Kako je prethodno opisano u uvodnoj izjavi 60., primjedbe o šteti, uzročnosti i interesu Unije dostavljene nakon tih objava u cijelosti su razmotrene u ovom ispitnom postupku te su, prema potrebi, uzete u obzir u nalazima ovog ispitnog postupka.
On 28 September 2018, the Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Komisija je 28. rujna 2018. sve stranke obavijestila o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih namjerava uvesti konačnu antisubvencijsku pristojbu na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure (i.e. 8 October 2018).
Svim je strankama odobreno razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle podnijeti primjedbe na konačnu objavu (8. listopada 2018.).
Several interested parties requested an extension of the deadline.
Nekoliko zainteresiranih strana zatražilo je produljenje roka.
The Commission granted until 10 October 2018 10AM for submitting comments to those parties.
Komisija je to odobrila i rok za dostavu primjedbi produljen je do 10. listopada 2018. u 10 sati.
The CCCMC, the CRIA, three out of the four sampled Chinese exporting producers, two unrelated importers made written submissions commenting on the final disclosure.
Primjedbe o konačnoj objavi dostavili su CCCMC, CRIA, tri od četiri kineska proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku i dva nepovezana uvoznika.
Following final disclosure, the China National Tire Group claimed its rights of defence have been breached by the Commission when it rejected its request for further extension of the deadline provided for submission of comments on the final disclosure.
Nakon konačne objave Grupa China National Tire tvrdila je da je Komisija povrijedila njezino pravo na obranu odbacivši njezin zahtjev za dodatno produljenje roka za podnošenje primjedbi na konačnu objavu.
According to it, the Commission should not view the ten-day period as a fixed time limit.
Njezino je mišljenje da Komisija ne bi trebala desetodnevno razdoblje smatrati fiksnim rokom.
Furthermore, when setting out the deadline, the Commission should consider the peculiarities of the case at hand and allow sufficient time for both written and oral submissions.
Nadalje, pri utvrđivanju roka Komisija bi trebala uzeti u obzir posebnosti predmeta te osigurati dovoljno vremena za pisane podneske i usmeno očitovanje.
In respect of these claims, the Commission noted that it had fully complied with the minimum deadline of 10 days set in Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation for comments on final disclosure.
U pogledu tih tvrdnji Komisija je napomenula da je u potpunosti poštovala minimalni rok od 10 dana za dostavu primjedbi o konačnoj objavi, koji je utvrđen u članku 30. stavku 5. osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, it also granted an extension to all interested parties in the proceeding who requested so taking into account the urgency of the matter in accordance with the same Article.
Osim toga, odobrila je njegovo produljenje svim zainteresiranim stranama u postupku koje su to zatražile uzimajući u obzir hitnost predmeta u skladu s istim člankom.
The Commission observed that the EU institutions are not legally bound by the General Data Protection Regulation but by Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Komisija je primijetila da institucije EU-a nisu pravno obvezane Općom uredbom o zaštiti podataka, nego Uredbom 45/2001.
The Commission therefore concluded that Hämmerling's status as interested party in the proceeding and its rights of defence were not directly affected.
Komisija je stoga zaključila da položaj društva Hämmerling kao zainteresirane strane u postupku i njegovo pravo na obranu nisu izravno narušeni.
After final disclosure, Hämmerling reiterated its claim that ‘the right to personal data protection is an independent right, where threshold for its violation does not require an actual example, but the mere possibility of being misused in inappropriate manner, such as making it available to unverified users of database in third-countries with no adequate assessment of their observance of data protection law’.
Nakon konačne objave društvo Hämmerling ponovilo je svoju tvrdnju da je „pravo na zaštitu osobnih podataka neovisno pravo te da nije potreban stvaran primjer njegova kršenja, nego je dovoljna samo mogućnost zlouporabe, kao što je stavljanje na raspolaganje tih podataka neprovjerenim korisnicima baze podataka u trećim zemljama, bez odgovarajuće procjene njihova poštovanja zakona o zaštiti podataka.”
In relation to this claim, the Commission referred to Article 9(6) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 that allows the Commission to transfer personal data if the transfer is necessary or legally required for the defence of legal claims, and the fact that all data subjects have to sign the TRON terms of use (that stipulates amongst other that there can be no unauthorized release of any information from TRON) when entering into TRON for the first time when they were granted interested party access to a case.
U vezi s tom tvrdnjom Komisija upućuje na članak 9. stavak 6. Uredbe 45/2001 koji joj omogućuje prijenos osobnih podataka ako je on potreban ili pravno obvezan za obranu pravnih zahtjeva te na činjenicu da sve osobe na koje se podaci odnose, pri prvom ulasku u bazu podataka TRON nakon što im se odobri pristup određenom predmetu, moraju pristati na uvjete uporabe TRON-a (kojima se, među ostalim, zabranjuje neovlašteno širenje informacija iz TRON-a).
It considered therefore that the use of TRON is compliant with the applicable data protection rules.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da je uporaba TRON-a u skladu s primjenjivim pravilima o zaštiti podataka.
Following final disclosure the Giti Group requested a hearing with Hearing Officer claiming that its rights of defence have been breached by the Commission as it included the duty drawback scheme very late in the proceeding and it arrived to wrong conclusions.
Nakon konačne objave Grupa Giti zatražila je saslušanje pred službenikom za saslušanje tvrdeći da je Komisija povrijedila njezino pravo na obranu jer je program povrata uvoznih naknada u postupak uključila vrlo kasno i zato došla do pogrešnih zaključaka.
The Hearing Officer took the view that the Notice of Initiation allowed for covering the scheme under discussion.
Službenik za saslušanja smatrao je da je u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka taj program obuhvaćen.
Furthermore, the Giti Group should have been aware that this scheme is covered by the proceeding and had sufficient time to present all their comments to the Commission.
Nadalje, Grupa Giti trebala je znati da je taj program obuhvaćen postupkom i imala je dovoljno vremena da sve svoje primjedbe dostavi Komisiji.
The Hearing Officer concluded that the rights of defence of the Giti Group were respected.
Stoga je službenik za saslušanja smatrao da se pravo Grupe Giti na obranu poštovala.
Several other interested parties reiterated the same concerns as expressed after the information document and asked the Commission to make further clarifications.
Nekoliko drugih zainteresiranih strana ponovilo je nedoumice koje su već izražene nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama te je od Komisije zatražilo objašnjenje.
The Commission considered that the open file, the Information Document and the Final Disclosure contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence.
Komisija je smatrala da u otvorenom spisu, dokumentu s informacijama i konačnoj objavi već postoji dovoljno informacija kojima se svim zainteresiranim stranama omogućuje da u potpunosti ostvare pravo na obranu.
Moreover, a note for the file providing clarifications on the Information Document was included in the open file before final disclosure.
Nadalje, bilješka za spis u kojoj se nalaze pojašnjenja o dokumentu s informacijama uključena je u javni spis prije konačne objave.
It therefore rejected the request to provide further clarifications.
Stoga je odbacila zahtjev za dodatna objašnjenja.
Finally, the parties claimed that their rights of defence were seriously affected as the period for commenting on the final disclosure was too short even with the extension and did not take into consideration the peculiarities of this investigation.
Konačno, stranke su tvrdile da je njihovo pravo na obranu bilo ozbiljno ugroženo jer je razdoblje za dostavu primjedbi o konačnoj objavi bilo prekratko usprkos njegovu produljenju i jer nisu uzete u obzir posebnosti ovog ispitnog postupka.
Regarding the set deadline the Commission reiterated that it had complied with the legal deadline under Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation, as further explained in recital (65) above.
U pogledu utvrđenog roka Komisija je ponovila da je poštovala zakonski rok u skladu iz članka 30. stavka 5. osnovne uredbe, kako je dodatno objašnjeno u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 65.
It added that the parties had received an extensive disclosure by means of the Information Document in July 2018 which already set out the main considerations and conclusions for all subsidies with the exception of excess remission of natural rubber and electricity provided for less than adequate remuneration.
Dodala je da su stranke u srpnju 2018. zaprimile brojne informacije u dokumentu s informacijama, u kojem su već izneseni glavni aspekti i zaključci za sve subvencije, uz iznimku pretjeranog otpusta carina za prirodni kaučuk i električne energije koja se prodavala po cijeni manjoj od primjerene.
At that stage parties were granted a deadline of 25 days to submit comments.
U toj su fazi stranke dobile rok od 25 dana za dostavu primjedbi.
As most of the issues were therefore known to all parties, the comments received upon final disclosure were also substantial, ranging from 8 to 63 pages.
Budući da su sve stranke već bile upoznate s većinom tih pitanja, nakon konačne objave zaprimljene su i opsežne primjedbe (u rasponu od 8 do 63 stranica).
With respect to the injury aspect of this investigation, the Commission noted that parties received a final disclosure and an additional final disclosure document also in the context of the parallel anti-dumping investigation.
U pogledu aspekta štete ovog ispitnog postupka Komisija je napomenula da su stranke primile konačnu objavu i dodatni dokument o konačnoj objavi i u okviru usporednog antidampinškog ispitnog postupka.
The present investigation addressed the comments received following the two disclosures.
U ovom je ispitnom postupku odgovoreno na primjedbe primljene nakon tih dviju objava.
Therefore, the Commission considered that the open file and the disclosures already contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence within the deadline as set out in the definitive disclosure document.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da su otvoreni spis i objave već sadržavali dovoljno informacija da se svim zainteresiranim stranama omogući potpuno ostvarenje prava na obranu u roku utvrđenom u dokumentu o konačnoj objavi.
For these reasons, the Commission took the view that the rights of defence of all interested parties were fully observed during this proceeding.
Zato je Komisija smatrala da je pravo na obranu svih zainteresiranih strana tijekom ovog postupka bilo u potpunosti poštovano.
The manufacturing process of the new lorry and bus tyres involves: (1) compounding and mixing rubber; (2) tyre components preparation; (3) (green) tyre building; (4) curing (vulcanisation); and (5) final inspection.
Postupak proizvodnje novih guma za kamione i autobuse uključuje: 1. pripremu i miješanje kaučuka; 2. pripremu komponenti gume; 3. (zelenu) proizvodnju gume; 4. vulkanizaciju; i 5. završnu kontrolu.
Again, this process can involve varying technologies without impact on the Commission's interchangeability findings.
Taj postupak isto može uključivati različite tehnologije, a da to ne utječe na nalaze Komisije o međusobnoj zamjenjivosti.
Lorry and bus tyres are produced in a large variety of types and sizes found on a wide range of commercial vehicles, from local delivery lorries and buses in urban or regional settings to the long haul lorries and buses according to their size and load index specifications.
Proizvode se različite vrste i veličine guma za kamione i autobuse koje se upotrebljavaju za velik broj gospodarskih vozila, od lokalnih dostavnih kamiona i autobusa u gradskim i regionalnim područjima do kamiona i autobusa za velike udaljenosti, ovisno o njihovoj veličini i specifikacijama indeksa opterećenja.
The four categories of tyres for lorries or buses are: steer, drive, trailer and multi-position.
Četiri su kategorije guma za kamione ili autobuse: upravljačke i pogonske gume, gume za prikolice te gume za kombiniranu upotrebu.
Trailer tyres are designed to be mounted on trailers, while multi- position tyres are designed to be used in all in all positions on a vehicle depending on its use.
Gume za prikolice konstruirane su za postavljanje na prikolice, dok se gume za kombiniranu upotrebu mogu upotrebljavati u svim položajima na vozilu ovisno o namjeni vozila.
Information collected and received by the Commission indicates that the Union market for bus and lorry tyres is segmented in three tiers or segments.
Informacije koje je Komisija prikupila i primila upućuju na to da je tržište guma za autobuse i kamione u Uniji podijeljeno na tri razine ili segmenta.
While there are no clear dividing lines among tiers, there is a general agreement among interested parties and the findings of the Commission on the following categorisation.
Iako ne postoje jasne granice između razina, između zainteresiranih strana i u nalazima Komisije postoji opća suglasnost u pogledu sljedeće kategorizacije.
Brand recognition is a key factor for tyres in this tier and justifies significantly higher prices for expected high performances as well particularly strong marketing investments.
Prepoznatljivost marke ključan je čimbenik za gume te razine te opravdava znatno više cijene za očekivanu visoku izvedbu i izrazito velika ulaganja u oglašavanje.
Original equipment for lorries or buses manufacturers (‘OE1’) tyres are primarily included in that tier.
Toj razini pripadaju ponajprije gume proizvođača originalne opreme za kamione ili autobuse („OE1”).
Original equipment for trailers manufacturers (‘OE2’) tyres may be included in that tier.
U tu se razinu mogu uključiti gume proizvođača originalne opreme za prikolice („OE2”).
Tier 3 tyres cover both new and retreaded tyres with lower mileage performances and very limited retreadability, if any.
Gume 3. razine uključuju nove i protektirane gume lošije izvedbe u smislu kilometraže te vrlo ograničene mogućnosti protektiranja, ako ona uopće postoji.
They are typically priced at less than 65 % of the price and mileage performance of tier 1 tyres.
Njihova je cijena obično manja od 65 % cijene i izvedbe u smislu kilometraže guma 1. razine.
In that tier, brand recognition is almost non-existent and price becomes the determining factor in the customer's decision to purchase.
U toj razini kupci ne prepoznaju gotovo nijednu marku te cijena postaje odlučujući čimbenik u njihovoj odluci o kupovini.
Retreading is, however, quite widespread in the Union and in other markets, for example in Brazil.
Međutim, djelatnost protektiranja vrlo je raširena u Uniji i na drugim tržištima, primjerice, u Brazilu.
This corresponds to tier 2 tyres,
To odgovara gumama 2. razine,
independent retreaders which usually cover much smaller geographical markets and volumes.
neovisnih proizvođača protektiranih guma koji obično obuhvaćaju znatno manja zemljopisna tržišta i obujmove.
The Commission issued the mapping of new and retreaded tyres by brand on the basis of information provided by the complainant, which was made available to all the interested parties on 27 October 2017.
Komisija je na temelju informacija podnositelja pritužbe objavila podjelu novih i protektiranih guma prema markama, koja je svim zainteresiranim stranama stavljena na raspolaganje 27. listopada 2017.
As noted in recital (86), interested parties generally accepted the principle of the market segmentation into three tiers.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 86., zainteresirane strane općenito su prihvatile načelo podjele tržišta na tri razine.
More specifically, China National Tire Group considered its Aeolus brand as tier 3 (instead of tier 2); two importers importing the brand Double Coin claimed it should be classified into tier 2 (instead of tier 3); the Hankook Group considered that its brand Aurora belonged to tier 2 (instead of tier 3); the Giti Group considered in its questionnaire reply that its brand Primewell and GT Radial belonged to tier 2 (instead of tier 3) and an independent importer claimed that the brand Sailun should be classified into tier 2 (instead of tier 3).
Točnije, Grupa China National Tire smatrala je da njezina marka Aeolus pripada 3. razini (a ne 2. razini); dva uvoznika koja uvoze marku Double Coin tvrdila su da bi tu marku trebalo svrstati u 2. razinu (a ne u 3. razinu); Grupa Hankook smatrala je da njezina marka Aurora pripada 2. razini (a ne 3. razini); Grupa Giti u odgovoru na upitnik smatrala je da njezine marke Primewell i GT Radial pripadaju 2. razini (a ne 3. razini), a neovisni uvoznik tvrdio je da bi marku Sailun trebalo svrstati u 2. razinu (a ne u 3. razinu).
In line with the characteristics identified in recital (81), it analysed in how far the tyres from the specific brands are (1) retreadable; (2) used for original equipment for buses and lorries; and (3) marketed in a certain tier according to each company's own assessment.
U skladu sa svojstvima utvrđenima u uvodnoj izjavi 81. Komisija je analizirala u kojoj se mjeri gume određenih marki: 1. mogu protektirati; 2. upotrebljavaju kao originalna oprema za autobuse i kamione; i 3. stavljaju na tržište u određenoj razini na temelju vlastite procjene svakog društva.
However, the original equipment activities of the Giti Group do not extend to lorries and buses, but relate to passenger car tyres.
Međutim, djelatnosti Grupe Giti u pogledu proizvodnje originalne opreme ne uključuju kamione i autobuse, već se odnose na gume za osobne automobile.
For the China National Tire Group, the Commission preliminarily accepted to classify its Aeolus brand into tier 3 as requested by the company, based on the claims that its tyres are generally not retreadable and they are not sold in the OE market.
Komisija je privremeno prihvatila zahtjev Grupe China National Tire da se njezina marka Aeolus svrsta u 3. razinu na temelju tvrdnji da se njezine gume općenito ne može protektirati i da se ne prodaju na tržištu originalne opreme.
The importers making the claims on the brands Double Coin and Sailun were not sampled companies, so the Commission could not verify their claims at this stage.
Uvoznici koji su podnijeli zahtjev za marke Double Coin i Sailun nisu bili društva u uzorku pa Komisija u ovoj fazi nije mogla provjeriti istinitost njihovih tvrdnji.
Therefore, while not calling into question the evidence submitted by the importers on their experience of their customers with the tyres from such brands, the Commission did not take any position on their claims at this stage.
Stoga, ne dovodeći u pitanje dokaze koje su dostavili izvoznici o iskustvu njihovih kupaca s gumama tih marki, Komisija u ovoj fazi nije donijela nikakvu odluku o njihovim zahtjevima.
CRIA and CCCMC as well as China National Tire Group claimed that either new tyres or retreaded tyres should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned, because:
CRIA i CCCMC te Grupa China National Tire tvrdili su da bi iz definicije predmetnog proizvoda trebalo isključiti nove gume ili protektirane gume zbog sljedećih razloga:
new tyres and retreaded tyres have different essential physical, technical and chemical characteristics,
nove gume i protektirane gume imaju različita bitna fizička, tehnička i kemijska svojstva,
retreaded tyres have a shorter lifespan than new tyres,
protektirane gume imaju kraći životni vijek od novih guma,
new tyres and retreaded tyres have different uses, sales channels, applications and consumer perception.
nove gume i protektirane gume imaju različitu namjenu, prodajne kanale, primjene i kupci ih različito percipiraju.
In particular, retreaded tyres are not used in the original equipment market, and they are not generally fitted on the steering axle and onto lorries carrying dangerous goods,
Konkretno, protektirane gume ne upotrebljavaju se na tržištu originalne opreme te se načelno ne postavljaju na upravljačku osovinu ni na kamione koji prevoze opasnu robu,
After the final disclosure, Pirelli reiterated a similar claim.
Nakon konačne objave društvo Pirelli ponovilo je sličnu tvrdnju.
Those parties also observed that the Commission and the European Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) in several competition cases concluded that new tyres and retreaded ones constitute two different relevant markets in terms of price, structure of supply, structure of demand, supply channels and substitutability.
Navedene su stranke primijetile i da su Komisija i Sud u nekoliko predmeta u pogledu tržišnog natjecanja zaključili da nove i protektirane gume čine dva različita relevantna tržišta u smislu cijene, strukture ponude, strukture potražnje, opskrbnih kanala i zamjenjivosti.
The CRIA and the CCCMC also pointed out that other anti-dumping investigating authorities treated new and retreaded tyres separately.
CRIA i CCCMC istaknuli su i da su druga tijela u antidampinškim ispitnim postupcima odvojeno promatrala nove i protektirane gume.
After the final disclosure, Hämmerling reiterated a similar claim.
Nakon konačne objave društvo Hämmerling ponovilo je sličnu tvrdnju.
The CRIA and the CCCMC submitted that the Commission erred in its assessment with regard to the factors of relevance, by not treating new and retreaded tyres separately.
CRIA i CCCMC naveli su da je Komisija pogriješila u svojoj procjeni relevantnih čimbenika jer nije odvojeno promatrala nove i protektirane gume.
The Giti Group claimed that retreadable or multi-life tyres should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned as retreadable tyres are more sophisticated than non-retreadable tyres with distinctive technical features.
Grupa Giti tvrdila je da bi protektirane gume ili one koje se mogu obnavljati više puta trebalo isključiti iz definicije predmetnog proizvoda jer su zbog svojih posebnih tehničkih svojstava protektirane gume naprednije od guma koje se ne mogu protektirati.
The main difference in technical characteristics between a newly produced tyre and a retreaded tyre built on its casing is that a retreaded tyre may indeed have a shorter lifespan and the retreaded tyre may be perceived as a less safe option.
Glavna je razlika u tehničkim svojstvima novoproizvedene gume i protektirane gume izrađene na njezinu plaštu u tome što protektirana guma zaista može imati kraći vijek trajanja te se može smatrati manje sigurnom opcijom.