natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Directive 2003/81/EC of 5 September 2003 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include molinate, thiram and ziram as active substances (OJ L 224, 6.9.2003, p. 29).
Direktiva Komisije 2003/81/EZ od 5. rujna 2003. o izmjeni Direktive Vijeća 91/414/EEZ radi uvrštavanja molinata, tirama i zirama kao aktivnih tvari (SL L 224, 6.9.2003., str. 29.).
EFSA Journal 2017;15(7):4700 [29 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4700.
EFSA Journal 2017.;15(7):4700 [29 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4700.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/524 of 28 March 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances Bacillus subtilis (Cohn 1872) Strain QST 713, identical with strain AQ 713, clodinafop, clopyralid, cyprodinil, dichlorprop-P, fosetyl, mepanipyrim, metconazole, metrafenone, pirimicarb, Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain: MA 342, pyrimethanil, quinoxyfen, rimsulfuron, spinosad, thiacloprid, thiamethoxam, thiram, tolclofos-methyl, triclopyr, trinexapac, triticonazole and ziram.
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/524 оd 28. ožujka 2018. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 540/2011 u pogledu produljenja roka važenja odobrenja aktivnih tvari Bacillus subtilis (Cohn 1872) soj QST 713, identičan soju AQ 713, klodinafop, klopiralid, ciprodinil, diklorprop-P, fosetil, mepanipirim, metkonazol, metrafenon, pirimikarb, Pseudomonas chlororaphis soj MA 342, pirimetanil, kvinoksifen, rimsulfuron, spinosad, tiakloprid, tiametoksam, tiram, tolklofos-metil, triklopir, trineksapak, tritikonazol i ziram.
(OJ L 88, 4.4.2018, p. 4).
(SL L 88, 4.4.2018., str. 4).
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiram.
„Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tiram” (Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od pesticida koji sadržavaju aktivnu tvar tiram).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1501
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1501
concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance pymetrozine, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o neproduljenju odobrenja aktivne tvari pimetrozin u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja i o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 540/2011
Commission Directive 2001/87/EC included pymetrozine as an active substance in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC.
Direktivom Komisije 2001/87/EZ pimetrozin je uvršten u Prilog I. Direktivi Vijeća 91/414/EEZ kao aktivna tvar.
The approval of the active substance pymetrozine, as set out in Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, expires on 30 June 2019.
Odobrenje aktivne tvari pimetrozin, kako je navedena u dijelu A Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) br. 540/2011, istječe 30. lipnja 2019.
An application for the renewal of the approval of pymetrozine was submitted in accordance with Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010 within the time period provided for in that Article.
Zahtjev za produljenje odobrenja aktivne tvari pimetrozin podnesen je u skladu s člankom 4. Uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 1141/2010 u roku predviđenom tim člankom.
The applicant submitted the supplementary dossiers required in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010.
Podnositelj zahtjeva dostavio je dodatnu dokumentaciju u skladu s člankom 9. Uredbe (EU) br. 1141/2010.
The rapporteur Member State prepared a renewal assessment report in consultation with the co-rapporteur Member State and submitted it to the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) and the Commission on 28 June 2013.
Država članica izvjestiteljica nakon savjetovanja s državom članicom suizvjestiteljicom pripremila je izvješće o ocjeni produljenja i dostavila ga 28. lipnja 2013. Europskoj agenciji za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”) i Komisiji.
On 28 August 2014 the Authority communicated to the Commission its conclusion on whether pymetrozine can be expected to meet the approval criteria provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Agencija je 28. kolovoza 2014. Komisiji dostavila zaključak o tome može li se pretpostaviti da pimetrozin ispunjava mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
The Authority concluded that there is a high potential for the representative uses assessed to result in groundwater exposure above the parametric drinking water limit of 0,1 μg/l by the toxicologically relevant metabolite CGA371075 in all pertinent groundwater scenarios.
Agencija je zaključila da postoji velika mogućnost da procijenjene reprezentativne uporabe dovedu do izloženosti podzemnih voda toksikološki relevantnom metabolitu CGA371075 koja premašuje parametarsku graničnu vrijednost za pitku vodu od 0,1 μg/L u svim relevantnim scenarijima povezanima s podzemnim vodama.
The Authority further concluded that several other toxicologically relevant metabolites of pymetrozine are also predicted to occur above 0,1 μg/L in some or all pertinent groundwater scenarios for the representative uses evaluated.
Agencija je nadalje zaključila da se u odnosu na reprezentativne uporabe obuhvaćene evaluacijom predviđa pojava još nekoliko toksikološki relevantnih metabolita pimetrozina na razinama iznad 0,1 μg/L u nekim ili svim relevantnim scenarijima povezanima s podzemnim vodama.
It also concluded that the toxicological profile of metabolites included in the plant residue definition for risk assessment could not be confirmed and that the assessment of the risk to aquatic organisms from exposure to metabolite M3MF could not be ﬁnalised for all representative uses considered based on the information available in the dossier.
Zaključila je i to da se nije mogao potvrditi toksikološki profil metabolita uključenih u definiciju biljnih rezidua za procjenu rizika i da se procjena rizika za vodene organizme od izloženosti metabolitu M3MF nije mogla dovršiti za sve razmatrane reprezentativne uporabe na temelju informacija dostupnih u dokumentaciji.
Additionally, the Authority concluded that pymetrozine caused adverse effects on endocrine organs across different species and timelines.
Agencija je usto zaključila da pimetrozin ima negativne učinke na endokrine organe različitih vrsta i u različitim vremenskim okvirima.
However, the scientific assessment for potential endocrine disruption properties of pymetrozine could not be finalised by the Authority based on the information available in the dossier.
Međutim, agencija na temelju informacija dostupnih u dokumentaciji nije mogla dovršiti znanstvenu procjenu potencijalnih svojstava pimetrozina u pogledu endokrine disrupcije.
The Commission invited the applicant to submit its comments on the conclusion of the Authority and, in accordance with Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010, on the draft review report.
Komisija je pozvala podnositelja zahtjeva da podnese primjedbe o zaključku Agencije i, u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EU) br. 1141/2010, o nacrtu izvješća o ponovnoj ocjeni.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the applicant, the concerns related to the substance could not be eliminated.
Međutim, unatoč argumentima koje je iznio podnositelj zahtjeva, bojazni povezane s tom tvari nisu se mogle ukloniti.
Consequently, it has not been established with respect to one or more representative uses of at least one plant protection product that the approval criteria provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are satisfied.
Slijedom toga, nije utvrđeno da su ispunjena mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 u odnosu na jednu ili više reprezentativnih uporaba najmanje jednog sredstva za zaštitu bilja.
It is therefore appropriate not to renew the approval of the active substance pymetrozine in accordance with Article 20(1)(b) of that Regulation.
Stoga je primjereno ne produljiti odobrenje za aktivnu tvar pimetrozin u skladu s člankom 20. stavkom 1. točkom (b) te uredbe.
Member States should be allowed sufficient time to withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing pymetrozine.
Državama članicama trebalo bi dati vremena da oduzmu odobrenja za sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju pimetrozin.
For plant protection products containing pymetrozine, where Member States grant any grace period in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, that period should, at the latest, expire on 30 January 2020.
Ako države članice u skladu s člankom 46. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 odobre razdoblje odgode za sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju pimetrozin, to bi razdoblje trebalo isteći najkasnije 30. siječnja 2020.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/917 extended the expiry date of pymetrozine to 30 June 2019 in order to allow the renewal process to be completed before the expiry of the approval of that substance.
Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2018/917 datum isteka odobrenja za pimetrozin produljen je do 30. lipnja 2019. kako bi se omogućilo da se postupak produljenja odobrenja te tvari dovrši prije isteka odobrenja.
However, given that a decision is taken ahead of that extended expiry date, this Regulation should apply as soon as possible.
Međutim, s obzirom na to da je odluka donesena prije novog datuma isteka odobrenja, ova bi Uredba trebala stupiti na snagu što prije.
This Regulation does not prevent the submission of a further application for the approval of pymetrozine pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Ovom se Uredbom ne sprečava ponovno podnošenje zahtjeva za odobrenje pimetrozina u skladu s člankom 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
Smatralo se potrebnim donijeti provedbeni akt i predsjednik odbora podnio je nacrt provedbenog akta žalbenom odboru na daljnje razmatranje.
The approval of the active substance pymetrozine is not renewed.
Odobrenje za aktivnu tvar pimetrozin ne produljuje se.
In Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, row 23, on pymetrozine, is deleted.
U dijelu A Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) br. 540/2011 briše se redak 23. o pimetrozinu.
Member States shall withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing pymetrozine as active substance by 30 April 2019 at the latest.
Države članice oduzimaju odobrenja za sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja kao aktivnu tvar sadržavaju pimetrozin najkasnije do 30. travnja 2019.
Any grace period granted by Member States in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 shall be as short as possible and shall expire by 30 January 2020.
Sva razdoblja odgode koja države članice odobre u skladu s člankom 46. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 moraju biti što kraća i moraju isteći najkasnije 30. siječnja 2020.
Commission Directive 2001/87/EC of 12 October 2001 amending Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market to include acibenzolar-s-methyl, cyclanilide, ferric phosphate, pymetrozine and pyraflufen-ethyl as active substances (OJ L 276, 19.10.2001, p. 17).
Direktiva Komisije 2001/87/EZ od 12. listopada 2001. o izmjeni Priloga I. Direktivi Vijeća 91/414/EEZ o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja radi uvrštavanja acibenzolar-s-metila, ciklanilida, željezova fosfata, pimetrozina i piraflufen-etila kao aktivnih tvari (SL L 276, 19.10.2001., str. 17.).
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pymetrozine.
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pymetrozine (Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od uporabe aktivne tvari pimetrozin kao pesticida).
EFSA Journal 2014;12(9):3817, 102 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3817.
EFSA Journal 2014.; 12(9):3817, 102 str. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3817.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/917 of 27 June 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances alpha-cypermethrin, beflubutamid, benalaxyl, benthiavalicarb, bifenazate, boscalid, bromoxynil, captan, carvone, chlorpropham, cyazofamid, desmedipham, dimethoate, dimethomorph, diquat, ethephon, ethoprophos, etoxazole, famoxadone, fenamidone, fenamiphos, flumioxazine, fluoxastrobin, folpet, foramsulfuron, formetanate, Gliocladium catenulatum strain: J1446, isoxaflutole, metalaxyl-m, methiocarb, methoxyfenozide, metribuzin, milbemectin, oxasulfuron, Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251, phenmedipham, phosmet, pirimiphos-methyl, propamocarb, prothioconazole, pymetrozine and s-metolachlor (OJ L 163, 28.6.2018, p. 13).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/917 od 27. lipnja 2018. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 540/2011 u pogledu produljenja roka važenja odobrenja aktivnih tvari alfa-cipermetrin, beflubutamid, benalaksil, bentiavalikarb, bifenazat, boskalid, bromoksinil, kaptan, karvon, kloroprofam, ciazofamid, desmedifam, dimetoat, dimetomorf, dikvat, etefon, etoprofos, etoksazol, famoksadon, fenamidon, fenamifos, flumioksazin, fluoksastrobin, folpet, foramsulfuron, formetanat, Gliocladium catenulatum soj J1446, izoksaflutol, metalaksil-m, metiokarb, metoksifenozid, metribuzin, milbemektin, oksasulfuron, Paecilomyces lilacinus soj 251, fenmedifam, fosmet, pirimifos-metil, propamokarb, protiokonazol, pimetrozin i s-metolaklor (SL L 163, 28.6.2018., str. 13.).
Regulation (EU) 2018/1504 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2018/1504 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
repealing Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union
o stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EU) br. 256/2014 o obavješćivanju Komisije o investicijskim projektima u području energetske infrastrukture u Europskoj uniji
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed to cooperate in order to update and simplify Union legislation by means of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
Međuinstitucijskim sporazumom od 13. travnja 2016. o boljoj izradi zakonodavstva Europski parlament, Vijeće i Komisija usuglasili su se surađivati kako bi se zakonodavstvo Unije ažuriralo i pojednostavnilo.
In order to clean-up and reduce the volume of Union legislation, it is necessary to identify legislation that is obsolete or no longer fit for purpose.
Kako bi se zakonodavstvo Unije pročistilo te kako bi se smanjio njegov opseg, potrebno je odrediti propise koji su zastarjeli ili više ne odgovaraju svrsi.
Repealing such legislation keeps the legislative framework transparent, clear and easy to use.
Stavljanjem takvog zakonodavstva izvan snage zakonodavni okvir ostaje transparentan, jasan i jednostavan za upotrebu.
Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council requires Member States to notify the Commission of investment projects on which construction or decommissioning work has started or on which a final investment decision has been taken.
Uredbom (EU) br. 256/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od država članica zahtijeva se da Komisiju obavijeste o investicijskim projektima za koje su započeli radovi na izgradnji ili stavljanju izvan pogona ili za koje je donesena konačna odluka o ulaganju.
The obligations under Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 concerning the notification of investment projects, and certain information and data relating to such notification, were previously laid down in Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010.
Obveze iz Uredbe (EU) br. 256/2014 u pogledu obavješćivanja o investicijskim projektima te određenih informacija i podataka koji se odnose na to obavješćivanje prethodno su bile utvrđene u Uredbi Vijeća (EU, Euratom) br. 617/2010.
The Court of Justice annulled Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010, holding that it should have been adopted on another legal basis, but its effects were maintained until Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 entered into force.
Sud je poništio Uredbu (EU, Euratom) br. 617/2010 jer je smatrao da je trebala biti donesena na drugoj pravnoj osnovi, ali je ona proizvodila učinke do stupanja na snagu Uredbe (EU) br. 256/2014.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 was intended to provide the Commission with data and information on planned developments in production, transmission and storage capacities as well as on projects in the energy sectors.
Svrha Uredbe (EU, Euratom) br. 617/2010 bila je da Komisija dobije podatke i informacije o planiranom razvoju u pogledu proizvodnje, transporta i kapaciteta skladištenja te o projektima u energetskim sektorima.
It was intended to give the Commission an overall picture of the development of investment in energy infrastructure in the Union.
Komisija je trebala imati potpun uvid u razvoj ulaganja u energetsku infrastrukturu u Uniji.
Since the creation of the obligations laid down in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 and Regulation (EU) No 256/2014, there have been three reporting exercises: in 2011, 2013 and 2015.
Od stvaranja obveza utvrđenih Uredbom (EU, Euratom) br. 617/2010 i Uredbom (EU) br. 256/2014 provedena su tri postupka izvješćivanja: u 2011., 2013. i 2015.
Furthermore, the Commission arranged for an external study to be undertaken following three reporting exercises by Member States which took place under Regulation (EU) No 256/2014.
Osim toga, Komisija je nakon triju postupaka izvješćivanja od strane država članica koji su provedeni na temelju Uredbe (EU) br. 256/2014 organizirala provođenje vanjske studije.
Consequently, enough time has elapsed and sufficient experience has been gained for the Commission to be able to carry out an evidence-based critical analysis of whether Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 has delivered the expected results.
Proteklo je stoga dovoljno vremena i stečeno je dovoljno iskustva da bi Komisija mogla provesti kritičku analizu na temelju dokaza jesu li Uredbom (EU) br. 256/2014 postignuti očekivani rezultati.
In 2016, the Commission carried out the review provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 256/2014, including a stakeholder consultation covering all planning and reporting obligations in the energy sector.
Komisija je 2016. provela preispitivanje predviđeno člankom 11. Uredbe (EU) br. 256/2014, uključujući savjetovanje s dionicima o svim obvezama u pogledu planiranja i izvješćivanja u energetskom sektoru.
The Commission came to the conclusion that there were significant overlaps between Member States’ reporting obligations under Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 and Member States’ obligations to report to the European network of transmission system operators for electricity (‘ENTSO-E’) and the European network for transmission system operators for gas (‘ENTSOG’).
Komisija je došla do zaključka da postoje znatna preklapanja između obveza država članica u pogledu izvješćivanja na temelju Uredbe (EU) br. 256/2014 i obveza država članica da izvješćuju Europsku mrežu operatora prijenosnih sustava za električnu energiju („ENTSO-E”) i Europsku mrežu operatora transportnih sustava za plin („ENTSOG”).
It also became apparent that the quality and appropriateness of the information and data received were often poor, and that that information and data had become available to the Commission via other sources, such as the European network of transmission system operators (‘ENTSOs’), the ten-year network development plans (‘TYNDPs’), the annual reports of Transmission System Operators and utility companies, and national development plans.
Također je postalo jasno da su kvaliteta i primjerenost dobivenih informacija i podataka često nezadovoljavajući te da su te informacije i podaci već dostupni Komisiji iz drugih izvora, kao što su europske mreže operatora prijenosnih odnosno transportnih sustava („ENTSO-ovi”), desetogodišnji planovi razvoja mreže, godišnja izvješća operatora prijenosnih odnosno transportnih sustava i komunalnih poduzeća te nacionalni razvojni planovi.
Furthermore, it was noted that the Commission has direct access to market data via its Energy Market Observation System (‘EMOS’).
Osim toga, napomenuto je da Komisija ima izravan pristup podacima o tržištu preko svojeg Sustava za praćenje energetskog tržišta („EMOS”).
Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 has therefore not delivered the expected results in terms of quantity, quality and appropriateness of data and information received by the Commission.
Uredba (EU) br. 256/2014 nije stoga ostvarila očekivane rezultate u smislu količine, kvalitete i primjerenosti podataka i informacija koje Komisija prima.
Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 should therefore be repealed,
Uredbu (EU) br. 256/2014 trebalo bi stoga staviti izvan snage,
Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 is repealed.
Uredba (EU) br. 256/2014 stavlja se izvan snage.
OJ C 227, 28.6.2018, p. 103.
SL C 227, 28.6.2018., str. 103.
Position of the European Parliament of 3 July 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council decision of 27 September 2018.
Stajalište Europskog parlamenta od 3. srpnja 2018. (još nije objavljeno u Službenom listu) i odluka Vijeća od 27. rujna 2018.
Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union, replacing Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 736/96 (OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 61).
Uredba (EU) br. 256/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 26. veljače 2014. o obavješćivanju Komisije o investicijskim projektima u području energetske infrastrukture u Europskoj uniji, zamjeni Uredbe Vijeća (EU, Euratom) br. 617/2010 i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 736/96 (SL L 84, 20.3.2014., str. 61.).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 September 2012 in Case C-490/10, Parliament v Council, ECLI:EU:C:2012:525.
Presuda Suda od 6. rujna 2012. u predmetu C-490/10, Parlament protiv Vijeća, ECLI:EU:C:2012:525.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1506
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1506
on exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy
o izvanrednim mjerama potpore za sektore jaja i mesa peradi u Italiji
Between 30 April 2016 and 28 September 2017, 43 outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5 and H7 were confirmed and notified by Italy.
U razdoblju od 30. travnja 2016. do 28. rujna 2017. Italija je potvrdila i prijavila 43 slučaja izbijanja visokopatogene influence ptica podtipa H5 i H7.
The species affected are ducks, turkeys, Guinea fowls, and Gallus domesticus chicks, chickens, pullets and laying hens.
Pogođene vrste su patke, purani, biserke te pilići, kokoši, mlade kokoši i kokoši nesilice vrste Gallus domesticus.
Italy immediately and efficiently took all the necessary animal health and veterinary measures required in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC.
Italija je odmah i učinkovito poduzela sve potrebne mjere za zdravlje životinja i veterinarske mjere u skladu s Direktivom Vijeća 2005/94/EZ.
In particular, Italy took control, monitoring and preventive measures and established protection and surveillance zones (‘the regulated zones’) pursuant to Commission Implementing Decisions (EU) 2016/697, (EU) 2017/155, (EU) 2017/247 (EU) 2017/263, (EU) 2017/417, (EU) 2017/554, (EU) 2017/696, (EU) 2017/780, (EU) 2017/977, (EU) 2017/1397, (EU) 2017/1415, (EU) 2017/1484, (EU) 2017/1519 and (EU) 2017/1593.
Italija je posebice poduzela mjere kontrole i praćenja i preventivne mjere te utvrdila zaražena i ugrožena područja („regulirana područja”) u skladu s provedbenim odlukama Komisije (EU) 2016/697, (EU) 2017/155, (EU) 2017/247 (EU) 2017/263, (EU) 2017/417, (EU) 2017/554, (EU) 2017/696, (EU) 2017/780, (EU) 2017/977, (EU) 2017/1397, (EU) 2017/1415, (EU) 2017/1484, (EU) 2017/1519 (EU) i 2017/1593.