natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation should be terminated (i) as dumping margins from Indonesia are de minimis and (ii) due to the fact that it cannot be established that there is a genuine and substantial causal relationship between the dumped imports from Argentina and the material injury suffered by the Union industry as required under Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation.
Ispitni bi postupak trebalo prekinuti i. jer su dampinške marže za uvoz iz Indonezije na razini de minimis te ii. zbog činjenice da se ne može utvrditi da postoji stvarna i bitna uzročno-posljedična veza između dampinškog uvoza iz Argentine i materijalne štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije, kako se zahtijeva člankom 3. stavkom 7. osnovne uredbe.
This means that existing measures which are still in force for those exporting producers from Argentina and Indonesia that had not successfully challenged the anti-dumping measures before the General Court should be repealed.
To znači da bi trebalo staviti izvan snage postojeće mjere koje su i dalje na snazi za one proizvođače izvoznike iz Argentine i Indonezije koji nisu s uspješnim ishodom osporili antidampinške mjere pred Općim sudom.
For the sake of clarity and legal certainty, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 should therefore be repealed.
Stoga bi radi jasnoće i pravne sigurnosti trebalo staviti izvan snage Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 1194/2013.
The definitive anti-dumping duties paid pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 on imports of biodiesel from Argentina and Indonesia and the provisional duties definitively collected in accordance with Article 2 of that Regulation, should be repaid or remitted insofar as they relate to imports of biodiesel sold for export to the Union by the companies which successfully challenged that Regulation in court, that is, Argentinian exporting producers Unitec Bio SA, Molinos Rio de la Plata SA, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos SACIFI y A, Vicentin SAIC, Aceitera General Deheza SA, Bunge Argentina SA, Cargill SACI, Louis Dreyfus Commodities S.A. (LDC Argentina SA), and Indonesian exporting producers PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri, PT Ciliandra Perkasa, PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia, PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas).
Konačne antidampinške pristojbe plaćene na temelju Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1194/2013 za uvoz biodizela iz Argentine i Indonezije i privremene pristojbe koje su konačno naplaćene u skladu s člankom 2. te uredbe trebalo bi vratiti ili otpisati ako se odnose na uvoz biodizela koji društva koja su uspjela osporiti tu uredbu pred sudom, odnosno argentinski proizvođači izvoznici Unitec Bio SA, Molinos Rio de la Plata SA, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos SACIFI y A, Vicentin SAIC, Aceitera General Deheza SA, Bunge Argentina SA, Cargill SACI, Louis Dreyfus Commodities S.A. (LDC Argentina SA) i indonezijski proizvođači izvoznici PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri, PT Ciliandra Perkasa, PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia, PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas), prodaju radi izvoza u Uniju.
The repayment or remission has to be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with the applicable customs legislation.
Povrat ili otpis treba zatražiti od nacionalnih carinskih tijela u skladu s primjenjivim carinskim propisima.
Following disclosure, PT Cermerlang Energi Perkasa, claimed that the repayment and remission of anti-dumping duties should be available to all companies that had incurred such duties and not only to those companies that had successfully challenged the definitive Regulation in Court.
PT Cermerlang Energi Perkasa je nakon objave iznio tvrdnju da bi povrat ili otpis antidampinških pristojbi trebao biti dostupan svim društvima koja su obuhvaćena obvezom plaćanja tih pristojbi, a ne samo onim poduzećima koja su uspjela osporiti konačnu uredbu na sudu.
It also claims that not only Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 but also amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1578 should be repealed.
Iznio je i tvrdnju da bi Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 1194/2013 i Uredbu 2017/1578 o izmjeni te uredbe trebalo staviti izvan snage.
First, the Commission recalled that Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1578 only amended Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013.
Komisija je prvo podsjetila da je Uredbom 2017/1578 samo izmijenjena Provedbena uredba (EU) br. 1194/2013.
As the latter regulation is repealed the amending regulation becomes void of any legal effect.
Ako se ta uredba stavi izvan snage, uredba o izmjeni gubi svaki pravni učinak.
Therefore, there is no need to repeal explicitly also that regulation.
Stoga nema potrebe za izričitim stavljanjem izvan snage i te uredbe.
Second, the General Court's annulment of Implementing Regulation (EC) No 1194/2013 only applies to those companies that challenged that regulation before the Court.
Drugo, poništenje Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1194/2013 po presudi Općeg suda primjenjuje se samo na društva koja su osporavala tu odluku pred Općim sudom.
Accordingly, the anti-dumping duties that have been levied on other companies have been legally collected under Union law.
Sukladno tome, antidampinške pristojbe naplaćene drugim poduzećima prikupljale su se u skladu s pravom Unije.
The Commission therefore rejected the claim that also those duties should be repaid or remitted.
Komisija je stoga odbila zahtjev za povrat ili otpis i tih pristojbi.
In view of the recent case-law of the Court of Justice, it is also appropriate to provide for the rate of default interest to be paid in case of reimbursement of definitive duties, because the relevant provisions in force concerning customs duties do not provide for such an interest rate, and the application of national rules would lead to undue distortions between economic operators depending on which Member State is chosen for customs clearance.
Uzimajući u obzir nedavnu sudsku praksu Suda, primjereno je i predvidjeti stopu zatezne kamate koja će se platiti u slučaju povrata konačnih pristojbi jer se u relevantnim odredbama na snazi u pogledu carinskih pristojbi ne predviđa ta kamatna stopa i jer bi primjena nacionalnih pravila dovela do neopravdanih poremećaja među gospodarskim subjektima, ovisno o tome koja je država članica odabrana za carinjenje.
The Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation did not deliver an opinion.
Odbor osnovan u skladu s člankom 15. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe nije dostavio mišljenje,
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend originating in Argentina and Indonesia, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098 (TARIC codes 1516209821, 1516209829 and 1516209830), ex15180091 (TARIC codes 1518009121, 1518009129 and 1518009130), ex15180095 (TARIC code 1518009510), ex15180099 (TARIC codes 1518009921, 1518009929 and 1518009930), ex27101943 (TARIC codes 2710194321, 2710194329 and 2710194330), ex27101946 (TARIC codes 2710194621, 2710194629 and 2710194630), ex27101947 (TARIC codes 2710194721, 2710194729 and 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992 (TARIC codes 3824999210, 3824999212 and 3824999220), 38260010 and ex38260090 (TARIC codes 3826009011, 3826009019 and 3826009030) (‘biodiesel’) is hereby terminated.
Prekida se antidampinški postupak koji se odnosi na uvoz monoalkilnih estera masnih kiselina i/ili parafinskih plinskih ulja dobivenih sintezom i/ili hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnog podrijetla, u čistom obliku ili u mješavini, podrijetlom iz Argentine i Indonezije, trenutačno razvrstanih u oznake KN ex15162098 (oznake TARIC 1516209821, 1516209829 i 1516209830), ex15180091 (oznake TARIC 1518009121, 1518009129 i 1518009130), ex15180095 (oznaka TARIC 1518009510), ex15180099 (oznake TARIC 1518009921, 1518009929 i 1518009930), ex27101943 (oznake TARIC 2710194321, 2710194329 i 2710194330), ex27101946 (oznake TARIC 2710194621, 2710194629 i 2710194630), ex27101947 (oznake TARIC 2710194721, 2710194729 i 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992 (oznake TARIC 3824999210, 3824999212 i 3824999220), 38260010 i ex38260090 (oznake TARIC 3826009011, 3826009019 i 3826009030) („biodizel”).
The definitive anti-dumping duties paid pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 on imports of biodiesel from Argentina and Indonesia and the provisional duties definitively collected in accordance with Article 2 of that Regulation, shall be repaid or remitted insofar as they relate to imports of biodiesel sold for export to the Union by the following companies:
Konačne antidampinške pristojbe plaćene na temelju Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1194/2013 za uvoz biodizela iz Argentine i Indonezije i privremene pristojbe koje su konačno naplaćene u skladu s člankom 2. te uredbe vraćaju se ili otpisuju ako se odnose na uvoz biodizela koji sljedeća društva prodaju radi izvoza u Uniju:
The repayment or remission shall be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with the applicable customs legislation.
Povrat ili otpis zahtijeva se od nacionalnih carinskih tijela u skladu s primjenjivim carinskim propisima.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 is repealed.
Provedbena uredba (EU) br. 1194/2013 stavlja se izvan snage.
Judgments of 15 September 2016 in Case T-80/14, PT Musim Mas v Council, Case T-111/14 Unitec Bio SA v Council of the European Union, Cases T-112/14 to T-116/14 and T-119/14, Molinos Río de la Plata SA and Others v Council of the European Union, Case T-117/14, Cargill SACI v Council of the European Union, Case T-118/14, LDC Argentina SA v Council of the European Union, Case T-120/14, PT Ciliandra Perkasa v Council of the European Union, Case T-121/14, PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri v Council of the European Union (OJ C 402, 31.10.2016, p. 28).
Presude od 15. rujna 2016. u predmetu T-80/14, PT Musim Mas protiv Vijeća, predmetu T-111/14 Unitec Bio SA protiv Vijeća Europske unije, predmetima T-112/14 do T-116/14 i T-119/14, Molinos Río de la Plata SA i drugi protiv Vijeća Europske unije, predmetu T-117/14, Cargill SACI protiv Vijeća Europske unije, predmetu T-118/14, LDC Argentina SA protiv Vijeća Europske unije, predmetu T-120/14, PT Ciliandra Perkasa protiv Vijeća Europske unije, predmetu T-121/14, PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri protiv Vijeća Europske unije (SL C 402, 31.10.2016., str. 28.).
Case T-139/14, PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia v Council of the European Union (OJ C 392, 24.10.2016, p. 26).
Predmet T-139/14, PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia i PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia protiv Vijeća Europske unije (SL C 392, 24.10.2016., str. 26.).
Argentinian exporting producers Unitec Bio SA, Molinos Rio de la Plata SA, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos SACIFI y A, Vicentin SAIC, Aceitera General Deheza SA, Bunge Argentina SA, Cargill SACI, Louis Dreyfus Commodities S.A. (LDC Argentina SA), and Indonesian exporting producers PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri, PT Ciliandra Perkasa, PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia, PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas).
Argentinski proizvođači izvoznici Unitec Bio SA, Molinos Rio de la Plata SA, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos SACIFI y A, Vicentin SAIC, Aceitera General Deheza SA, Bunge Argentina SA, Cargill SACI, Louis Dreyfus Commodities S.A. (LDC Argentina SA) i indonezijski proizvođači izvoznici PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri, PT Ciliandra Perkasa, PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia, PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas).
Orders of the President of the Court of 15 February 2018 in Joined Cases C-602/16 P and C-607/16 P to C-609/16 P, and of 16 February 2018 in cases C-603/16 P to C-606/16 P.
Rješenja predsjednika Suda od 15. veljače 2018. u spojenim predmetima C-602/16 P i C-607/16 P do C-609/16 P i od 16. veljače 2018. u predmetima C-603/16 P do C-606/16 P.
WTO, Report of the Appellate Body, AB-2016-4, WT/DS473/AB/R, 6 October 2016, and WTO, Report of the Panel, WT/DS473/R, 29 March 2016.
WTO, Izvješće Žalbenog tijela, AB-2016-4, WT/DS473/AB/R, 6. listopada 2016. i WTO, Izvješće povjerenstva, WT/DS473/R, 29. ožujka 2016.
WTO, Report of the Panel, WT/DS480/R, 25 January 2018.
WTO, Izvješće povjerenstva, WT/DS480/R, 25. siječnja 2018.
Notice of initiation regarding the anti-dumping measures in force on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, following the recommendations and rulings adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization in the EU — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel dispute (DS473) (OJ C 476, 20.12.2016, p. 3).
Obavijest o pokretanju pregleda u pogledu antidampinških mjera koje su na snazi za uvoz biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine i Indonezije u skladu s preporukama i odlukama koje je Tijelo za rješavanje sporova Svjetske trgovinske organizacije donijelo u sporu EU – Antidampinške mjere na biodizel (DS473) (SL C 476, 20.12.2016., str. 3.).
Regulation (EU) 2015/476 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (OJ L 83, 27.3.2015, p. 6).
Uredba (EU) 2015/476 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. ožujka 2015. o mjerama koje Unija može poduzeti slijedom izvješća koje je donijelo Tijelo za rješavanje sporova WTO-a u pogledu antidampinških pitanja i pitanja o zaštiti od subvencioniranog uvoza (SL L 83, 27.3.2015., str. 6.).
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1578 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 18 September 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (OJ L 239, 19.9.2017, p. 9).
Provedbena uredba (EU) 2017/1578 od 18. rujna 2017. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1194/2013 o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine i Indonezije (SL L 239, 19.9.2017., str. 9.).
Notice concerning the judgments of the General Court of 15 September 2016 in Cases T-80/14, T-111/14 to T-121/14 and T-139/14 regarding Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on Argentinian and Indonesian imports of biodiesel, and following the recommendations and rulings adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organisation in disputes DS473 and DS480 (EU — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel disputes) (OJ C 181, 28.5.2018, p. 5).
Obavijest o presudi Općeg suda od 15. rujna 2016. u predmetima T-80/14, T-111/14 do T-121/14 i T-139/14 u vezi s Provedbenom uredbom Vijeća (EU) br. 1194/2013 o nametanju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz argentinskog i indonezijskog biodizela, i u skladu s preporukama i odlukama koje je donijelo Tijelo za rješavanje sporova Svjetske trgovinske organizacije u sporovima DS473 i DS480 (sporovi EU – antidampinške mjere na biodizel) (SL C 181, 28.5.2018., str. 5.).
Case C-256/16, Deichmann SE, ECLI:EU:C:2018:187. para. 87.
Predmet C-256/16, Deichmann SE, ECLI:EU:C:2018:187. točka 87.
United States Department of Commerce, Investigation A-560-830, Memorandum, ‘Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for the Final Determination – Wilmar Trading Pte. Ltd’, 20 February 2018.
Ministarstvo trgovine Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, istraga A-560-830, memorandum, Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for the Final Determination – Wilmar Trading Pte. Ltd. („Prilagodbe troškova proizvodnje i izračunane vrijednosti za konačno određivanje”), 20. veljače 2018.
Consistent with the ruling of the WTO in EU – Countervailing Measures on Certain Polyethylene Terephtalate from Pakistan, where the Appellate Body determined that ‘The key objective of a causation analysis under Article 15.5 of the SCM Agreement is for an investigating authority to establish whether there is a ‘genuine and substantial relationship of cause and effect’ between the subsidized imports and the injury to the domestic industry. ’ Report of the Appellate Body, AB-2017-5, WT/DS486/AB/R, 16 May 2018, in par. 5.226.
Provedbena uredba (EU) 2017/1578 o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1194/2013 o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine i Indonezije (SL L 239, 19.9.2017., str. 9.).
There was a significant decrease in imports from the United States (USA), Norway and South Korea following the imposition of measures on imports from the USA in 2009 and an anti-circumvention investigation against imports consigned from Canada in 2010.
Došlo je do znatnog smanjenja uvoza iz Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (SAD), Norveške i Južne Koreje nakon uvođenja mjera na uvoz iz SAD-a 2009. i ispitnog postupka protiv izbjegavanja mjera u odnosu na uvoz poslan iz Kanade 2010.
On the other hand, imports from Indonesia increased their share from 1,4 % to 8,5 %, which represented an increase of 500 % during the period considered.
S druge strane, udio uvoza iz Indonezije povećao se s 1,4 % na 8,5 %, što je povećanje od 500 % tijekom razmatranog razdoblja.
In so far as the Indonesian WTO report found that the anti-dumping measures on imports from Indonesia should be brought into conformity with the Union's WTO obligations, the Commission has agreed with Indonesia to implement those findings by October 2018.
Kad je u pitanju nalaz iz izvješća WTO-a o Indoneziji da bi antidampinške mjere na uvoz iz Indonezije trebalo uskladiti s obvezama Unije prema WTO-u, Komisija i Indonezija suglasile su se da te preporuke iz izvješća provedu do listopada 2018.
In line with the general principles of WTO settlement, such implementation will only have effect as from the date of implementation.
U skladu s općim načelima WTO-a o rješavanju sporova ta će pravila proizvoditi učinke tek od dana početka provedbe.
In order to establish a causal link between the dumped imports and the injury to the Union industry it must be demonstrated, in accordance with Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, that the dumped imports have caused material injury to the Union industry, while the injury caused by other known factors is not attributed to the dumped imports. The notion of a causal link is interpreted in a WTO compatible manner, meaning it needs to be established that there is a genuine and substantial causal relationship between the dumped imports and the injury to the domestic industry.
Kako bi se utvrdila uzročno-posljedična veza između dampinškog uvoza i štete za industriju Unije, mora se, u skladu s člankom 3. stavcima 6. i 7. osnovne uredbe, dokazati da je dampinški uvoz prouzročio materijalnu štetu za industriju Unije, dok se šteta prouzročena drugim poznatim čimbenicima ne pripisuje dampinškom uvozu.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1571
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1571
on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 26th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080
o najnižoj prodajnoj cijeni za obrano mlijeko u prahu za dvadeset i šesti djelomični poziv za podnošenje ponuda u okviru natječajnog postupka otvorenog Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2016/2080
In the light of the tenders received for the 26th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.
U svjetlu ponuda primljenih za dvadeset i šesti djelomični poziv za podnošenje ponuda, trebalo bi odrediti najnižu prodajnu cijenu.
For the 26th partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 16 October 2018, the minimum selling price shall be 123,10 EUR/100 kg.
Za dvadeset i šesti djelomični poziv za podnošenje ponuda za prodaju obranog mlijeka u prahu u okviru natječajnog postupka otvorenog Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2016/2080, za koji je rok za podnošenje ponuda istekao 16. listopada 2018., najniža prodajna cijena iznosi 123,10 EUR/100 kg.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1579
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1579
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in the People's Republic of China and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz određenih pneumatskih guma, novih ili protektiranih, od kaučuka, vrste koja se rabi za autobuse ili kamione, s indeksom opterećenja većim od 121, podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i o stavljanju izvan snage Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/163
Provisional measures
1.1 Privremene mjere
On 4 May 2018, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) adopted Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/683 (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the European Union (‘the Union’) of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 (‘the product concerned’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Europska komisija („Komisija”) donijela je 4. svibnja 2018. Uredbu Komisije (EU) 2018/683 („privremena uredba”) o uvođenju privremene antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz u Europsku uniju („Unija”) određenih pneumatskih guma, novih ili protektiranih, od kaučuka, vrste koja se rabi za autobuse ili kamione, s indeksom opterećenja većim od 121 („predmetni proizvod”), podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK”).
The Commission had initiated the investigation on 11 August 2017 by publishing a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘the Notice of Initiation’) following a complaint lodged on 30 June 2017 by the coalition against unfair tyres imports (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of new and retreaded tyres for buses or lorries.
Komisija je 11. kolovoza 2017. pokrenula ispitni postupak objavljivanjem Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka u Službenom listu Europske unije („Obavijest o pokretanju postupka”) nakon što je 30. lipnja 2017. Koalicija protiv nepoštenog uvoza guma („podnositelj pritužbe”) podnijela pritužbu u ime proizvođača koji čine više od 25 % ukupne proizvodnje novih i protektiranih guma za autobuse ili kamione u Uniji.
The Commission made imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC subject to registration by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163.
Komisija je Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2018/163 uvela obvezu evidentiranja uvoza predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom iz NRK-a.
The registration of imports ceased with the entry into force of the provisional measures on 8 May 2018.
Evidentiranje uvoza prekinuto je 8. svibnja 2018. stupanjem na snagu privremenih mjera.
As stated in recital (10) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 (‘the investigation period’) and the examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2014 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 10. privremene uredbe, ispitnim postupkom o dampingu i šteti obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. srpnja 2016. do 30. lipnja 2017. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka”), a ispitivanjem kretanja koja su važna za procjenu štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2014. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka („razmatrano razdoblje”).