natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards Marseille airport, this is 115 km away, which is 1 hour and 15 minutes’ journey by road.
Zračna luka Marseille nalazi se 115 km od Zračne luke Nîmes, odnosno udaljena je 1 sat i 15 minuta vožnje automobilom.
It is therefore too far away to suffer too much impact from the aid in question.
Prema tome, predaleko je da bi na nju pretjerano utjecale predmetne potpore.
As indicated previously, Montpellier airport is situated just 63 km from Nîmes airport, which represents a journey time of only 49 minutes by road.
Kao što je prethodno navedeno, Zračna luka Montpellier nalazi se na samo 63 km od Zračne luke Nîmes, odnosno 49 minuta vožnje automobilom.
In so far as the Commission considers that a distance of less than 100 km and a journey time of less than one hour are criteria allowing the catchment area of an airport to be defined as a first approximation, Montpellier airport is a priori situated within the catchment area of Nîmes airport.
Budući da Komisija smatra da su udaljenost do 100 km i vožnja kraća od jednog sata kriteriji kojima se, prvom aproksimacijom, utvrđuje prihvatno područje određene zračne luke, Zračna luka Montpellier nalazi se a priori unutar prihvatnog područja Zračne luke Nîmes.
Moreover, certain routes operated from Montpellier have the same destination as certain routes from Nîmes airport.
Usto, određene linije iz Zračne luke Montpellier imaju za odredište istu zajednica naselja poput linija iz Zračne luke Nîmes.
This is particularly the case with the routes to Brussels and London, which are offered from both airports.
To je posebno slučaj s linijama prema Bruxellesu i Londonu koje se nude iz obiju zračnih luka.
In this respect, France considers that the catchment area of an airport is defined using two criteria, namely: (i) length of the journey; and (ii) cost of the journey for airports dominated by low-cost traffic, such as Nîmes airport.
U tom pogledu Francuska smatra da se prihvatno područje zračne luke utvrđuje na temelju sljedećih dvaju kriterija: (i.) trajanje putovanja i (ii.) trošak puta, u zračnim lukama s prevladavajućim niskotarifnim prometom, poput Zračne luke Nîmes.
As a result, France considers that a regional airport’s catchment area is limited to those airports that can be reached by car within a maximum of 60 minutes.
Stoga Francuska smatra da je prihvatno područje regionalne zračne luke ograničeno na zračne luke do kojih je moguće doći automobilom za najviše 60 minuta.
According to France, ‘Lastly, as regards Montpellier airport, although the above information tends to place it in the same catchment area as Nîmes airport due to the journey time of less than 60 minutes and the cost of the return journey not exceeding EUR 20, it should, however, be stressed that the Ryanair routes from Montpellier airport, which currently number four, meet a tourist demand that is situated more to the west than to the east of the airport (the route to Hahn is an example of this, even though Ryanair has withdrawn its routes to Germany from Marseille) and that Nîmes airport covers a different catchment area from part of Montpellier airport’s catchment area (in particular the Cévennes, Uzège and the northeast of Gard/south of the Ardèche in the Rhône valley). It therefore has a particular catchment area. It should also be noted that 51 % of low-cost passengers travel less than 50 km from their airport’.
Prema mišljenju Francuske, „Kada je naposljetku riječ o Zračnoj luci Montpellier, iako se prethodno navedenim elementima želi smjestiti je u istu prihvatnu zonu Zračne luke Nîmes jer ih dijeli vožnja automobilom kraća od 60 minuta i jer cijena povratne vožnje ne prelazi 20 EUR, svejedno valja istaknuti da linije društva Ryanair iz Zračne luke Montpellier, kojih danas ima četiri, odgovaraju na turističku potražnju zapadnije, a ne istočnije od Zračne luke (linija sa Zračnom lukom Frankfurt-Hahn jedan je od primjera, iako je Ryanair ukinuo svoje linije iz Marseillea prema Njemačkoj) i da Zračna luka Nîmes pokriva prihvatno područje koje se dijelom razlikuje od onog Zračne luke Montpellier (osobito Cévennes, Uzège i sjeveroistok departmana Gard/jug departmana Ardèche u dolini rijeke Rhône). Stoga raspolaže vlastitim prihvatnim područjem. Valja istaknuti i da 51 % putnika na niskotarifnim letovima putuje manje od 50 km od svoje zračne luke.”
These factors are indeed likely to mitigate the impact on Montpellier airport of the operating aid received by Nîmes airport.
Naime, ti elementi mogu ublažiti učinak koje su operativne potpore koje je primila Zračna luka Nîmes imale na Zračnu luku Montpellier.
Added to this is the fact that, throughout the period in question, Montpellier airport handled much more traffic than Nîmes airport.
Tome ide u prilog činjenica da je Zračna luka Montpellier u tom razdoblju ostvarila znatno veći promet od Zračne luke Nîmes.
In fact, its traffic fluctuated between 1,2 million and 1,6 million passengers per year.
Naime, promet je tada varirao od 1,2 milijuna do 1,6 milijuna putnika godišnje.
The aid received by Nîmes airport, which is around six times smaller, could have had, at most, only a limited impact on Montpellier airport.
Potpora koju je primila Zračna luka Nîmes, koja je oko šest puta manja, mogla je imati tek ograničen učinak na Zračnu luku Montpellier.
Lastly, the journey time between the two airports, which is less than one hour but almost 50 minutes, is also a factor likely to mitigate the impact of the aid in question on Montpellier airport.
Naposljetku, vrijeme vožnje automobilom između dviju zračnih luka, u trajanju kraćem od jednog sata, tj. skoro 50 minuta, jest jednako tako jedan od faktora koji ublažavaju učinak predmetnih potpora na Zračnu luku Montpellier.
As a result, the operating aid in question had a limited impact on the airports neighbouring Nîmes airport.
Stoga su predmetne potpore imale ograničen učinak na zračne luke koje se nalaze u blizini Zračne luke Nîmes.
Taking into account all these positive and negative effects of the aid in question, the Commission takes the view that this aid did not affect trade to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Uzevši u obzir sve te pozitivne i negativne elemente koji su općenito posljedica dotičnih potpora, Komisija smatra da te potpore nisu utjecale na trgovinu u mjeri suprotnoj zajedničkom interesu.
In the light of the information set out above regarding the impact of the aid in question on competition and trade, and given the important contribution of this aid to the economic development of the area in which Nîmes airport is located, particularly due to its beneficial impact on local tourism and the industrial hub present at the airport site, the Commission considers that the aid in question did not affect competition and trade to an extent contrary to the common interest.
S obzirom na prethodno iznesene elemente koji se odnose na utjecaj predmetnih potpora na tržišno natjecanje i trgovinu te s obzirom na važan doprinos tih potpora gospodarskom razvoju područja na kojem se nalazi Zračna luka Nîmes, osobito zbog njezina pogodna utjecaja na lokalni turizam i poslovnog središta na području Zračne luke, Komisija smatra da predmetne potpore nisu utjecale na tržišno natjecanje i trgovinu u mjeri koja je suprotna zajedničkom interesu.
Conclusion on the compatibility of the aid granted to the CCI-Airport and VTAN
Zaključak o spojivosti potpora u korist odjela CCI-zračna luka i društva VTAN
In the light of the above, the exceptional operating subsidies, repayable advances, flat-rate contribution, as established by the initial version of the CDSP and increased by Amendments Nos 1 and 3, and specific public contribution constitute aid compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
S obzirom na prethodno navedeno, jednokratne subvencije za upravljanje, povratni predujmovi, paušalni doprinos, koji je uspostavljen prvotnom verzijom ugovora CDSP te povećan izmjenama br. 1 i br. 3, te poseban javni doprinos predstavljaju potpore spojive s unutarnjim tržištem u smislu članka 107. stavka 3. točke (c) UFEU-a.
The Commission has found that Ryanair/AMS benefited from unlawful aid that was incompatible with the internal market.
Komisija je utvrdila da je društvima Ryanair/AMS primilo nezakonite potpore koje su nespojive s unutarnjim tržištem.
According to settled case-law of the Court of Justice, when the Commission has found that aid is incompatible with the internal market, it is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter it.
U skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom Suda, kada Komisija utvrdi da je neka potpora nespojiva s unutarnjim tržištem, ona je nadležna obvezati dotičnu državu članicu da ukine ili izmijeni navedenu potporu.
According to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 ‘Where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as a “recovery decision”). The Commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of Community law’.
U skladu s člankom 14. Uredbe (EZ) br. 659/1999: „U slučaju kada se u slučajevima nezakonite potpore donesu negativne odluke, Komisija donosi odluku kojom se od dotične države članice zahtijeva da poduzme sve potrebne mjere kako bi od korisnika povukla sredstva potpore (dalje u tekstu „odluka o povratu potpore”). Komisija ne smije zahtijevati povrat sredstava potpore ako bi to bilo u suprotnosti s općim načelima prava Zajednice”.
According to settled case-law of the Court of Justice, where unlawful aid is regarded by the Commission as incompatible with the internal market, the purpose of the obligation imposed on the state is to re-establish the previously existing situation.
U skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom Suda, u pogledu nezakonitih potpora koje je Komisija ocijenila nespojivima s unutarnjim tržištem, cilj je obveze koja se nameće državi ponovna uspostava prijašnjeg stanja.
In this respect, the Court of Justice considers that the purpose is achieved when beneficiaries have repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage that they enjoyed over competitors.
U tom pogledu Sud smatra da je cilj ostvaren kada su korisnici vratili nezakonito dodijeljene iznose potpora te time gube prednost koju su imale u odnosu na konkurente.
In the present case, it appears that no general principle of Union law prevents recovery of the unlawful aid identified in this Decision.
U ovom je slučaju očito da nijedno opće načelo prava Unije ne bi bilo u suprotnosti s povratom nezakonitih potpora utvrđenih u okviru ove Odluke.
In particular, neither France nor the interested third parties have presented any arguments to that effect.
Osobito, ni Francuska ni treće zainteresirane osobe nisu u tom smislu dostavile argumente.
France must therefore take all necessary measures to recover from Ryanair/AMS the unlawful aid granted through the agreements in question.
Stoga Francuska treba poduzeti sve potrebne mjere kako bi od društva Ryanair/AMS povukla nezakonito dodijeljene potpore na temelju dotičnih ugovora.
The aid amounts resulting from the agreements signed with the CCI must be repaid to the latter.
Kada je riječ o iznosima potpore koji proizlaze iz ugovora sklopljenih s komorom CCI, potrebno ih je vratiti potonjoj.
The aid amounts resulting from the agreements signed with VTAN must be repaid to the SMAN given that, as previously shown, the state resources used to finance the advantages resulting from the agreements in question came from the SMAN via the operating subsidies paid to VTAN.
Iznose potpore koji proizlaze iz ugovora sklopljenih s društvom VTAN potrebno je vratiti sindikatu SMAN jer, kao što je prethodno dokazano, potječu od sindikata SMAN putem subvencija za upravljanje plaćenih društvu VTAN, pri čemu su prednosti koje su proizašle iz predmetnih ugovora financirane iz državnih sredstava.
The aid amounts to be recovered for each agreement must be determined as follows.
Iznosi potpore koje je potrebno vratiti za svaki ugovor moraju se utvrditi kako slijedi.
Each transaction under review (consisting, where applicable, of an airport services agreement and a marketing services agreement) must be regarded as having given rise to aid amounts calculated for each year that the agreements forming the transaction applied, or for each period for which the projected incremental flows were calculated.
Svaku je ispitanu transakciju (ako je proizašla iz ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i ugovora o marketinškim uslugama) potrebno smatrati kao da je dovela do iznosa potpore izračunanih za svaku godinu u kojoj su se primjenjivali ugovori na kojima se temelji transakcija ili za svako razdoblje za koje su izračunani predviđeni inkrementalni tokovi.
Each of these amounts is calculated using the negative part of the projected incremental flow (revenues less costs) at the time when the transaction was concluded, as shown in Tables 7 to 16.
Svaki od tih iznosa izračunan je na temelju negativnog dijela inkrementalnog toka (prihodi umanjeni za troškove) procijenjenog u trenutku zaključivanja transakcije i naveden je u tablicama od 7. do 16.
These amounts in fact correspond to the sums that should be deducted each year from the amount for the marketing services (or that should be added to the airport charges and ground handling charges invoiced to the airlines) so that the net present value of the agreement is positive, in other words so that this complies with the MEO principle.
Naime, ti iznosi odgovaraju svotama koje je trebalo odbiti od iznosa marketinških usluga (ili ih je trebalo pridodati naknadama zračne luke i naknadama za zemaljske usluge koje se obračunavaju zračnim prijevoznicima) kako bi diskontirana neto vrijednost ugovora bila pozitivna, odnosno kako bi ugovor bio usklađen s načelom subjekta u tržišnoj ekonomiji.
In order to take account of the effective advantage received by Ryanair/AMS under the agreements, the amounts referred to in the above recital may be adjusted, using evidence provided by France, according to (i) the difference between, on the one hand, the actual payments, as determined ex post, that were made by Ryanair for the landing charge, passenger charge and ground handling services under the airport services agreement and, on the other hand, the ( ex ante) projected flows corresponding to these income items, as indicated in Tables 7 to 16; (ii) the difference between, on the one hand, the actual marketing payments, as determined ex post, that were made to Ryanair or AMS under the marketing services agreement and, on the other hand, the corresponding (ex ante) projected marketing costs, as indicated in Tables 7 to 16.
Kako bi se uzela u obzir stvarna prednost koju je ostvarilo društvo Ryanair/AMS u skladu s ugovorima, iznosi navedeni u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi mogu biti prilagođeni s pomoću dokaza koje će dostaviti Francuska, ovisno o (i.) razlici između, s jedne strane, stvarnih plaćanja, poput onih utvrđenih ex post, koje je izvršio Ryanair u okviru naknade za slijetanje, naknade po putniku i naknade za zemaljske usluge primjenom Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i, s druge strane, o procijenjenim ( ex ante) tokovima koji odgovaraju tim stavkama prihoda te su navedeni u tablicama od 7. do 16., te (ii.) razlike između, s jedne strane, stvarnih marketinških plaćanja, poput onih utvrđenih ex post, koja su izvršena u korist društva Ryanair ili AMS u skladu s ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama i, s druge strane, predviđenim (ex ante) odgovarajućim marketinškim troškovima koji su navedeni u tablicama od 7. do 16.
In addition, the Commission considers that the effective advantage received by Ryanair/AMS is limited to the effective term of the agreement in question.
Usto, Komisija smatra da je stvarna prednost koju je primilo društvo Ryanair/AMS ograničena na stvarno trajanje dotičnog ugovora.
In effect, after the termination of each agreement, Ryanair/AMS did not receive any payments under these agreements and did not benefit from access to the airport infrastructure and ground handling services under these agreements.
Naime, nakon raskida svakog ugovora Ryanair/AMS nije primio uplate na temelju tih ugovora i nije imao pristup infrastrukturi zračne luke niti se mogao služiti zemaljskim uslugama u skladu s tim ugovorima.
Consequently, the aid amounts calculated as indicated above and associated with a given agreement are reduced to zero for the periods during which the agreement effectively ceased to apply (particularly due to early termination by mutual agreement between the parties).
Prema tome, iznosi potpore koji su izračunani kao što je prethodno navedeno, a povezani su s dotičnim ugovorom svedeni su na nulu za razdoblja tijekom kojih se ugovor stvarno prestao primjenjivati (osobito zbog sporazumnog prijevremenog raskida).
As a result, the aid amount to be recovered from Ryanair/AMS for certain agreements that did not run to term must be reduced to zero for the period from the effective expiry date of the agreement to the expiry date stipulated when the agreement was signed.
Prema tome, iznos potpore koje društvo Ryanair/AMS mora vratiti u pogledu određenih ugovora koji nisu istekli mora se svesti na nulu za razdoblje od datuma stvarnog isteka ugovora do datuma isteka predviđenog pri sklapanju ugovora.
Table 17 below gives information on the amounts to be used to calculate the amounts to be recovered.
U prethodno navedenoj tablici 17. iznesene su relevantne informacije o iznosima na temelju kojih su izračunani iznosi povrata.
These amounts consist of the negative parts of the incremental flows (revenues less costs) established by applying the MEO test, with reductions for the Ryanair/AMS agreements for the years that these agreements did not run to term.
Ovim su iznosima obuhvaćeni negativni dijelovi inkrementalnih tokova (prihodi umanjeni za troškove) utvrđeni primjenom načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu, sa sniženjima za ugovore društva Ryanair/AMS za godine u kojima nisu istekli.
Information on the amounts to be recovered [223]Indicative amounts (in EUR)
Informacije o iznosima za povrat [223]Indikativni iznosi (EUR)
Period during which the aid amount was received
Razdoblje u kojem je primljen iznos potpore
2004 (summer season)
2004. (ljetna sezona)
2007 (January to October)
2007. (od siječnja do listopada)
2007-2008 (winter season)
2007. – 2008. (zimska sezona)
2008 (summer season)
2008. (ljetna sezona)
2008-2009 (winter season)
2008. – 2009. (zimska sezona)
2009 (summer season)
2009. (ljetna sezona)
2009-2010 (winter season)
2009. – 2010. (zimska sezona)
2010 (summer season)
2010. (ljetna sezona)
2010-2011 (winter season)
2010. – 2011. (zimska sezona) 2011. (ljetna sezona)
2011 (winter season up to 31.12)
(zimska sezona do 31.12.)
CCI period:
Razdoblje komore CCI:
correspondence exchanged between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002
dopisi od kraja 2001. do početka 2002.
correspondence exchanged in 2004
dopisi iz 2004.
VTAN period:
Razdoblje društva VTAN
agreements of 2 January 2007
Ugovori od 2. siječnja 2007.
amendment of 1 August 2007
Izmjena od 1. kolovoza 2007.
agreements of 1 November 2007
Ugovori od 1. studenoga 2007.
agreements of 27 August 2008
Ugovori od 27. kolovoza 2008.
agreements of 25 August 2009
Ugovori od 25. kolovoza 2009.
amendment of 18 August 2010
Izmjena od 18. kolovoza 2010.
amendment of 30 November 2010
Izmjena od 30. studenoga 2010.
[850000-900000]
[850000 – 900000]
As explained in Section 7.1.1.2.3, the Commission considers that Ryanair and AMS form a single economic entity, and that the marketing services agreements and airport services agreements that were signed at the same time must be regarded as forming a single transaction between this entity and, as applicable, the CCI or VTAN.
Kao što je objašnjeno u odjeljku 7.1.1.2.3., Komisija smatra da Ryanair i AMS predstavljaju jedan gospodarski subjekt te da je ugovore o marketinškim uslugama i ugovore o uslugama zračne luke koji su istodobno sklopljeni potrebno smatrati jednom i jedinstvenom transakcijom između tog subjekta i, ovisno o slučaju, komore CCI ili društva VTAN.
The French authorities must recover the amounts indicated above within four months of the date of notification of this Decision.
Francuska tijela trebaju povrat navedenih iznosa primiti u roku od četiri mjeseca od dana priopćenja ove Odluke.
In this regard, the French authorities must also add the amount of recovery interest to the aid amount to be recovered, which shall be calculated from the date on which the aid in question was put at the disposal of the undertaking, namely on each effective date of granting of the aid, until the date of its effective recovery, in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
U tom pogledu, francuska tijela trebaju osim toga iznosu potpora za povrat dodati iznos kamata na povrat koje se računaju od dana kada su predmetne potpore stavljene poduzetniku na raspolaganje, odnosno od dana kada su potpore stvarno plaćene do njihova stvarnog povrata u skladu s poglavljem V. Uredbe (EZ) br. 794/2004.
Given that, in the present case, the flows making up this aid are complex and stem from several dates during the year, and are even continuous for certain categories of revenue, the Commission takes the view that it is acceptable, in calculating the recovery interest, to consider that the moment of payment of the aid amounts concerned is the final day of the period for which the amount has been calculated (for example, 31 December if the period in question is a calendar year, or 31 October if the period in question extends from 1 January to 31 October of a given year).
Budući da su, u ovom slučaju, tokovi od kojih se sastoje te potpore složeni te da su uslijedili nekoliko puta godišnje odnosno neprekidno kada je riječ o određenim kategorijama prihoda, Komisija smatra da je prihvatljivo pri izračunu kamata na povrat smatrati da su predmetne potpore isplaćene posljednjeg dana razdoblja za koje je iznos izračunan (na primjer, 31. prosinca ako je predmetno razdoblje kalendarska godina ili 31. listopada ako predmetno razdoblje traje od1. siječnja do 31. listopada određene godine).
In this regard, by choosing the final day of the period in question, the Commission is taking the approach that is most favourable for the beneficiaries.
U tom pogledu, odabirom posljednjeg dana predmetnog razdoblja Komisija primjenjuje najpovoljniji pristup za korisnike.
In accordance with settled case-law of the Court of Justice, if a Member State encounters unforeseen and unforeseeable difficulties or perceives consequences overlooked by the Commission, it may submit those problems for consideration by the Commission, together with proposals for suitable amendments.
U skladu sa sudskom praksom Suda, u slučaju da neka država članica naiđe na nepredviđene teškoće ili na okolnosti koje Komisija nije predvidjela, ta država članica može o tim problemima obavijestiti Komisiju te o prijedlozima primjerenih izmjena kako bi ih Komisija ocijenila.
The Commission therefore asks France to submit to it any problem that it may encounter in implementing this Decision,
Komisija traži od Francuske da je obavijesti o svim teškoćama s kojima se bude suočila pri izvršenju ove Odluke,
The following measures, which contain State aid unlawfully granted by France to Ryanair in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, are incompatible with the internal market:
Sljedeće mjere, koje sadržavaju državne potpore koje je Francuska nezakonito dodijelila u korist društva Ryanair, kršeći članak 108. stavak 3. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, nespojive su s unutarnjim tržištem: