natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taking into account only the incremental costs and revenues associated with the agreements concluded with Ryanair would reflect the conduct of a prudent market economy operator.
Uzimanje u obzir samo graničnih troškova i prihoda povezanih s ugovorima sklopljenima s društvom Ryanair odražava ponašanje razumnog subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
Ryanair adds that the costs associated with investments made before its arrival and fixed operating costs must not be taken into account.
Ryanair dodaje da nije potrebno uzeti u obzir troškove povezane s ulaganjima provedenima prije njegova dolaska i s fiksnim operativnim troškovima.
Ryanair further states that whether the airport in general is profitable or loss making is irrelevant in terms of the existence of aid for the benefit of the airline.
Dodaje da profitabilnost ili deficitarnost zračne luke uglavnom nije relevantna za postojanje potpore u korist zračnog prijevoznika.
Ryanair maintains that the cost analysis conducted by the Commission for the prudent operator test is incorrect as it fails to take account of the service level offered at Terminal mp2, which is below the level of the services offered to traditional airlines and is therefore in line with the applicable level of charges.
Ryanair tvrdi da je analiza troškova koju je Komisija provela u svrhu testa razumnog subjekta pogrešna jer njome nije uzeta u obzir razina usluga pruženih u terminalu mp2, koja je niža od usluga pruženih tradicionalnim prijevoznicima te stoga odgovara razini naknade na snazi.
Ryanair asserts that Terminal mp2 offers only basic infrastructures [37] and has a considerably smaller area per passenger compared with the main terminal (1,66 m2 as opposed to 6,06 m2).
Napominje da terminal mp2 nudi samo osnovnu infrastrukturu [37] i da po putniku nudi znatno manju površinu u odnosu na glavni terminal (1,66 m2 naspram 6,06 m2).
Ryanair argues that low-cost airlines should not pay charges for services that they do not use, or that they use to a lesser extent than traditional airlines [38].
Ryanair tvrdi da niskotarifni prijevoznici ne bi trebali plaćati naknade za usluge kojima se ne služe ili kojima se služe u manjoj mjeri od tradicionalnih prijevoznika [38].
Ryanair points out that it applies baggage fees to encourage its passengers not to check luggage, which has had the result that only one-third of Ryanair passengers check baggage.
Ryanair podsjeća da on primjenjuje naknade za prtljagu kako bi putnike potaknuo da ne predaju prtljagu, što je dovelo do toga da samo jedna trećina putnika društva Ryanair predaje prtljagu.
Moreover, Ryanair passengers take their baggage themselves from the check-in desks to security, which eliminates the need for any infrastructure at the terminal.
Usto, putnici društva Ryanair sami prenose svoju prtljagu od šaltera za registraciju putnika do osiguranja zračne luke, zbog čega je cjelokupna infrastruktura terminala beskorisna.
By comparison, Ryanair notes that Air France makes extensive use of the ground handling services associated with baggage at the airport.
Radi usporedbe, Ryanair ističe da se Air France više služi zemaljskim uslugama povezanima s prihvatom prtljage u zračnoj luci.
Ryanair maintains that its aircraft are the largest operating at Marseille Provence Airport, which means that the airport does not have to incur the opportunity costs associated with the operation of small aircraft in relation to the number of passengers carried.
Ryanair tvrdi da on upravlja najvećim zrakoplovima koji se upotrebljavaju u Zračnoj luci Marseille Provence, čime se izbjegava da Zračna luka snosi oportunitetne troškove povezane s upravljanjem malih zrakoplova zbog malog broja prevezenih putnika.
Ryanair stresses that it operates on the basis of 25-minute rotations, whereas the traditional airlines, such as Air France, have rotation times between 45 and 60 minutes.
Ryanair ističe da se između povratnih letova na tlu zadržava 25 minuta, dok taj vremenski razmak kod tradicionalnih prijevoznika, poput društva Air France, iznosi od 45 do 60 minuta.
A reduced rotation time limits the amount of time that ground areas are used by aircraft and passengers.
Međutim, kraćim zadržavanjem na tlu ograničava se vrijeme upotrebe korisne površine po zrakoplovu i po putniku.
Ryanair also notes that the criteria for using Terminal mp2 include the requirement to use C-type aircraft that can accommodate up to 200 seats and operate with reduced rotation times.
Ryanair podsjeća da se, uostalom, kriteriji upotrebe terminala mp2 temelje na zahtjevu upotrebe zrakoplova kategorije C koji mogu primiti do 200 putnika i kraće se zadržavati na tlu.
Lastly, Ryanair criticises the fact that the Commission has not taken into account in its decision the positive externalities associated with Ryanair's presence at the airport, namely the fact that the infrastructure's value has increased due to its presence, bearing in mind the risks inherent in operating the initial routes from the airport.
Naposljetku, Ryanair kritizira činjenicu da Komisija u svojoj odluci ne uzima u obzir pozitivne vanjske učinke povezane s prisutnošću društva Ryanair u zračnoj luci, odnosno činjenicu da vrijednost infrastrukture raste s njezinom posjećenosti, uzimajući u obzir rizike povezane s upravljanjem prvih linija u čvorištu.
Moreover, Ryanair claims that the presence of an airline at an airport creates a ripple effect leading to an increase in passenger numbers at that airport, and therefore an improvement in its commercial and transport infrastructures, which makes the airport more attractive.
Usto, Ryanair navodi da prisutnost zračnoj prijevoznika u zračnoj luci stvara povoljan učinak koji dovodi do povećanja broja putnika u tom čvorištu i tako do poboljšanja komercijalne i transportne infrastrukture zračne luke, što pospješuje atraktivnost čvorišta.
Ryanair underlines that it contractually undertook to carry a certain number of passengers to and from Marseille Provence Airport, which has therefore helped to generate these externalities, as apparently proven, firstly, by the increase in traffic at the airport, and particularly at Terminal mp2, and secondly by the increase in the number of airlines operating from the airport.
Ryanair ističe da se ugovorom obvezao na prijevoz određenog broja putnika u Zračnoj luci Marseille, i time pridonio stvaranju takvih vanjskih učinaka, kao što to dokazuju, s jedne strane, povećanje prometa u čvorištu, osobitu u terminalu mp2, i, s druge strane, povećanje broja zračnih prijevoznika koji posluju iz Zračne luke.
Ryanair also highlights that this type of undertaking means that it is the airline that bears all the risk associated with operating the route, which proves that the airport is in a position to accept a lower rate of return than it would have required in the absence of such undertakings.
Osim toga, Ryanair ističe da se takvom obvezom želi na zračnog prijevoznika prebaciti sav rizik povezan s upravljanjem linije te obrazlaže da Zračna luka može pristati na nižu stopu povrata ulaganja od one koju bi zahtijevala u nedostatku takvih obveza.
Ryanair encourages the Commission to adopt the ‘single till’ approach in its analysis, which involves taking joint account of both the aeronautical revenue and the commercial revenue generated by the presence of an airline at an airport.
Ryanair potiče Komisiju da u svojoj analizi primijeni pristup „jedne blagajne” kojim se u obzir uzimaju svi zrakoplovni i komercijalni prihodi koji proizlaze iz prisutnosti zračnog prijevoznika u čvorištu.
Ryanair notes in this respect that it carries more passengers per flight than Air France and that it operates ‘point-to-point’ flights where the passengers, in its opinion, are more likely to generate commercial revenue than transit passengers.
U tom pogledu napominje da prevozi više putnika po letu od društva Air France i da upravlja izravnim letovima na kojima putnici, smatra Ryanair, mogu stvoriti više komercijalnih prihoda od tranzitnih putnika.
Ryanair underlines that, since it started operating at Marseille Provence Airport, numerous businesses and several vehicle rental companies have set up in Terminal mp2 and that the non-aeronautical revenue generated by these activities contributes to the terminal's profitability.
Ryanair ističe da su od početka njegova djelovanja u Zračnoj luci Marseille Provence u terminalu mp2 počele poslovati brojne trgovine i nekoliko društava za iznajmljivanje vozila te da su izvanzrakoplovni prihodi nastali tim djelatnostima pridonijeli profitabilnosti tog terminala.
Ryanair argues further that the fact that the charges set for Terminal mp2 meet the market economy operator test proves that there has been no redistribution to Ryanair of the public resources allocated to the airport operator.
Naposljetku, Ryanair tvrdi da činjenica da je naknadama određenima za terminal mp2 poštovan test razumnog subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu dokazuje da na društvo Ryanair nisu prenesena javna sredstva dodijeljena upravitelju Zračne luke.
Even if it is proven that the airport has benefited from aid, Ryanair claims that it cannot be concluded that it has been the final beneficiary of that aid.
Iako je još potrebno dokazati postojanje potpore u korist Zračne luke, Ryanair osporava da bi to dovelo do zaključka da je on bio krajnji korisnik.
Next, Ryanair maintains that the charges applied at Terminal mp2 are not in any way selective, as the Commission has not proven that Ryanair has benefited from more favourable conditions than other airlines at Marseille Provence Airport.
Ryanair zatim tvrdi da naknade primijenjene u terminalu mp2 nisu ni u kojem slučaju selektivne jer Komisija nije utvrdila da je Ryanair ostvario povoljnije uvjete od drugih zračnih prijevoznika u Zračnoj luci Marseille.
Ryanair underlines that it is not enough to find that different levels of charges are applied to different airlines in order to reach this conclusion, but that the Commission should take account of the cost of the services offered to each airline by the airport as well as the positive externalities and non-aeronautical revenue generated by each airline.
Ističe da za taj zaključak nije dovoljno utvrditi da su se različite razine naknada primjenjivale na različite zračne prijevoznike, nego da je Komisija trebala uzeti u obzir trošak usluga koje Zračna luka nudi tim prijevoznicima, kao i pozitivne vanjske učinke i izvanzrakoplovne prihode koje proizvodi svaki prijevoznik.
Ryanair notes that its business model means that it carries, on each flight, a higher number of passengers than other airlines and that this saving made by the airport in the opportunity costs thus avoided must be reflected in the level of charges applied to Ryanair.
Ryanair podsjeća da se njegov poslovni model temelji na tome da na svakom letu prevozi veći broj putnika od ostalih prijevoznika te da se ta ušteda koju zračna luka ostvaruje u pogledu tako izbjegnutih oportunitetnih troškova treba odrazit u stopi naknada primijenjenih na Ryanair.
Lastly, Ryanair claims that the differentiation of charges between national flights and international flights constitutes abusive discrimination pursuant to Article 102 TFEU as it results from a decision made by the airport, given its dominant position in terms of the infrastructure's availability.
Naposljetku, Ryanair navodi da razlikovanje cijena između nacionalnih i međunarodnih letova predstavlja zlouporabnu diskriminaciju u smislu članka 102. UFEU-a jer ono proizlazi iz odluke zračne luke, s obzirom na njezin dominantni položaj pri stavljanju na raspolaganje infrastrukture.
Ryanair maintains that the services provided to passengers do not fundamentally differ according to their destination (domestic, national or international flight) and that the checking of international passengers' travel documents is a state responsibility and should not therefore be funded through the airport charges.
Ryanair tvrdi da usluge pružene putnicima nisu temeljno različite u pogledu njihova odredišta (nacionalni i međunarodni letovi) i da je provjera putnih dokumenata međunarodnih putnika dio državnih ovlasti i stoga se ne treba financirati naknadama zračne luke.
Ryanair regrets that France has not extended the finding made on the differentiation between national flights and Schengen flights to non-Schengen flights, which has resulted in the application of a charge that is 56 % higher than at the main terminal.
Žali što Francuska nije tvrdnju o razlikovanju između nacionalnih letova i letova unutar schengenskog prostora proširila na letove izvan schengenskog prostora, na koje se u glavnom terminalu primjenjuje naknada veća za 56 %.
Ryanair also maintains that this differentiation mechanism constitutes State aid.
Ryanair tvrdi i da taj sustav razlikovanja predstavlja državnu potporu.
Ryanair points out that Air France and its affiliated companies operate most of the domestic flights and therefore benefit from the system of differentiated charges.
Ističe da Air France i prijevoznici koji su s njime povezani uglavnom upravljaju nacionalnim letovima i stoga se na njih primjenjuje sustav razlikovanja cijena.
Consequently, Ryanair asks the Commission to include, in the measures covered by this investigation, the advantage granted to Air France resulting from the differentiation of charges between Schengen flights and non-Schengen flights so that it can seek damages before the French courts.
Prema tome, Ryanair od Komisije traži da mjerama koje su predmet ovog ispitivanja obuhvati prednost dodijeljenu društvu Air France koja je proizašla iz razlikovanja naknada između letova unutar i izvan schengenskog prostora kako bi pred francuskim sudovima dobio naknadu štete.
Ryanair has submitted additional information on the subject of AMS and the analysis to be conducted by the Commission.
Ryanair je proslijedio dodatne informacije u pogledu društva AMS i analize koju treba provesti Komisija.
Ryanair maintains that the existence of aid in the AMS agreement should be assessed separately from the other measures.
Navodi da je postojanje potpore u ugovoru s društvom AMS potrebno ocijeniti odvojeno od ostalih mjera.
However, if the Commission decides to assess this together with the conditions from which Ryanair has benefited at the airport, Ryanair has submitted an economic analysis and concludes on this basis that the AMS agreement would have been profitable for the airport in the short term.
Ipak, ako ga Komisija odluči ocijeniti zajedno s uvjetima koje je Ryanair ostvario u Zračnoj luci, Ryanair predlaže gospodarsku analizu i zaključuje da bi na toj osnovi ugovor s društvom AMS Zračnoj luci donio kratkoročnu profitabilnost.
The CCIMP agrees with France's arguments that the subsidies subject to limitation and the subsidies allocated to finance non-economic activities cannot be classed as State aid.
CCIMP se slaže s argumentima Francuske da se zastarjele subvencije i subvencije namijenjene financiranju negospodarskih djelatnosti ne mogu kvalificirati kao državne potpore.
The CCIMP agrees with France's view on the compatibility of the aid under investigation with the conditions laid down by the guidelines, in particular the conditions of proportionality and necessity.
CCIMP dijeli mišljenje Francuske o spojivosti ispitanih potpora u pogledu uvjeta predviđenih Smjernicama, posebno uvjeta proporcionalnosti i potrebe.
The CCIMP underlines the direct and indirect economic impact of the new terminal in the Marseille region and its role in reducing congestion at the central airports, ensuring European territorial cohesion and airport capacity-building given the risks of saturation [39].
CCIMP naglašava izravan i neizravan gospodarski utjecaj novog terminala na regiju Marseillea i svoju ulogu u rasterećenju središnjih zračnih luka, europskoj prostornoj povezanosti i povećanju kapaciteta zračnih luka kako ne bi došlo do zasićenosti [39].
The CCIMP considers that the development of a new terminal was essential to attract low-cost airlines that rarely operate from traditional infrastructures, which have characteristics that do not fit with their business model.
CCIMP smatra da je uređenje novog terminala bilo neophodno za dolazak niskotarifnih prijevoznika koji rijetko posluju u tradicionalnim infrastrukturama, čije karakteristike ne odgovaraju njihovom gospodarskom modelu.
The CCIMP states that only the creation of a low-cost terminal could meet the requirements of the low-cost airlines in terms of airport charges, under conditions of transparency and non-discrimination.
CCIMP podsjeća da je samo izgradnjom niskotarifnog terminala omogućeno ispunjavanje zahtjeva niskotarifnih prijevoznika u području naknada zračne luke, pod transparentnim i nediskriminirajućim uvjetima.
OPERATING SUBSIDIES GRANTED TO THE CCIMP
OPERATIVNE SUBVENCIJE U KORIST CCIMP-a
The CCIMP explains, in line with the comments made by France, that the financial flows totalling EUR […]* million involved contributions paid to the CCI's general arm for services rendered.
CCIMP navodi, uz razmatranja koja je iznijela Francuska, da se financijski tokovi u ukupnom iznosu od […]* milijuna EUR odnose na doprinose plaćene općem odjelu Zračne luke u zamjenu za pružene usluge.
It stresses that there was no financial transfer of resources from the CCI to Marseille Provence Airport.
Ističe da CCI nije prenio nikakva sredstva na Zračnu luku Marseille Provence.
It notes that, like any other business in the region, Marseille Provence Airport must pay the tax to cover the costs of chambers of commerce and industry, which totalled EUR 213553 in 2010.
Podsjeća da je Zračna luka Marseille Provence, kao i svaki poduzetnik prisutan u regiji, obveznik pristojbe za troškove trgovačkih i industrijskih komora, koju je za 2010. platila u iznosu od 213553 EUR.
The CCIMP points out that the low-cost Terminal mp2 offers simplified services, which allows differentiated charges to be applied, and confirms that all costs were taken into account when setting those charges.
CCIMP podsjeća da niskotarifni terminal mp2 nudi jednostavne usluge i različite cijene te potvrđuje da su pri određivanju tih cijena uzeti u obzir svi troškovi.
The CCIMP therefore concludes that Marseille Provence Airport is able to invoke the prudent operator principle to justify the existence of differentiated charges at each of the terminals.
CCIMP iz toga zaključuje da se Zračna luka Marseille Provence može pozvati na načelo razumnog subjekta kako bi opravdala postojanje različitih naknada u svakom od terminala.
The CCIMP takes the view that the ‘contributory’ method used to calculate the rate of return of Terminal mp2 is the only one that can take into account the transfer of an airline from one terminal to the other, with economies of scale resulting in stability of the costs concerned, whereas their distribution by terminal would have led to a reduction at the main terminal.
CCIMP smatra da jedino tzv. metoda „doprinosa” primijenjena pri izračunu stope profitabilnosti terminala mp2 omogućuje uzimanje u obzir prijenosa prijevoznika s jednog terminala na drugi, pri čemu ekonomija razmjera podrazumijeva stabilnost predmetnih troškova, dok njihova podjela na terminale dovodi do smanjenja na glavnom terminalu.
It notes that the construction of Terminal mp2 resulted in certain costs being pooled between the two terminals, which had the effect of reducing costs at the main terminal, and certain investments being postponed (delay of the construction of the Europe check-in area and the Europe/International departure hall).
Podsjeća da je izgradnja terminala mp2 imala za posljedicu podjelu određenih troškova između dvaju terminala, s učinkom smanjenja troškova glavnog terminala, odgode određenih ulaganja (odgoda izgradnje prostora za registraciju putnika i prtljage na europskim letovima te dvorane za ukrcavanje putnika na europskim i međunarodnim letovima).
INCENTIVE MEASURES FOR THE LAUNCH OF NEW ROUTES
POTICAJNI ZA ZAPOČINJANJE POSLOVANJA NOVIH LINIJA
The CCIMP states that it adopted a development plan intended to increase the number of passengers at the airport, particularly through the launch of new routes.
CCIMP izjavljuje da je izradila plan razvoja namijenjen povećanju posjećenosti Zračne luke, posebno putem otvaranja novih linija.
According to the CCIMP, the incentive measures were designed to achieve that objective, in line with the normal practice of airport operators, as apparently accepted by the Commission in its decision on Manchester Airport [40].
Poticaji su, prema mišljenju CCIMP-a, namijenjeni ispunjenju tog cilja, u skladu s uobičajenom praksom upraviteljâ zračnih luka, kao što je Komisija istaknula u svojoj Odluci o Zračnoj luci Manchester [40].
The CCIMP believes that the arrangement introduced must be regarded as a commercial practice excluding any aid pursuant to Article 107 TFEU, given that the arrangement was open, non-discriminatory and applied for a limited time based on objective criteria.
Prema mišljenju CCIMP-a, potrebno je na temelju objektivnih kriterija uspostavljeni sustav smatrati komercijalnom praksom koja isključuje svaku potporu u smislu članka 107. UFEU-a jer je otvoren, nediskriminirajući te jer je na snazi ograničeno vrijeme.
The CCIMP further maintains that this arrangement cannot be classed as aid because a prudent operator acting under normal market economy conditions could have taken the same approach.
CCIMP tvrdi da je potrebno odbaciti kvalifikaciju mjere kao potpore jer bi razuman subjekt koji djeluje u uobičajenim uvjetima tržišnog gospodarstva mogao intervenirati u jednakim uvjetima.
The CCIMP adds that, when its conduct is assessed in the light of normal market practices, the arrangement introduced remains reasonable.
CCIMP dodaje da je, s obzirom na uobičajene tržišne prakse u odnosu na koje je potrebno ocijeniti njegovo ponašanje, uspostavljeni sustav i dalje razuman.
MARKETING AID — AGREEMENT CONCLUDED WITH AMS
POTPORE ZA MARKETING – UGOVOR SKLOPLJEN S DRUŠTVOM AMS
The CCIMP maintains that it acted as a market economy operator by concluding the agreement with AMS.
CCIMP tvrdi da se ponio kao razuman subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu kada je sklopio Ugovor s društvom AMS.
It states that it paid a price that was clearly proportionate and reasonable given the services provided and practices in the sector, and disputes the relevance of the study submitted by Air France, which covers only general websites.
Napominje da je za pružene usluge platio očito proporcionalnu i razumnu cijenu s obzirom na prakse u sektoru te osporava relevantnost studije koju je iznio Air France, a koja se odnosi samo na web-mjesta namijenjena širokoj publici.
The CCIMP notes that, conversely, products advertised on the Ryanair website reach a large audience of internet users looking for flight tickets.
Naprotiv, CCIMP podsjeća da su proizvodi istaknuti na web-mjestu društva Ryanair namijenjeni širokoj publici korisnika interneta u potrazi za zrakoplovnim kartama.
The CCIMP notes that the annual cost of the AMS agreement according to the number of passengers carried was in the order of EUR […]* in 2010.
CCIMP podsjeća da je godišnji trošak Ugovora s društvom AMS sveden na broj prevezenih putnika 2010. iznosio otprilike […]* EUR.
ASSOCIATION OF EUROPEAN AIRLINES
UDRUGA EUROPSKIH ZRAČNIH PRIJEVOZNIKA
SUBSIDIES GRANTED TO THE CCIMP
SUBVENCIJE DODIJELJENE CCIMP-u
The Association of European Airlines (AEA) states that it supports all measures likely to contribute to regional development, but that subsidies granted to small regional airports must not have the effect of distorting competition.
Udruga europskih zračnih prijevoznika (Association of European Airlines, AEA) podsjeća da podržava sve mjere koje mogu pridonijeti regionalnom razvoju, ali da učinak subvencija dodijeljenih malim regionalnim zračnim lukama ne smije dovesti do narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja.
According to the AEA, the aviation sector should be regarded as a business sector in which any intervention, whether regulatory or financial, may cause distortions of competition.
Sektor zračnog prometa potrebno je, prema mišljenju AEA-a, smatrati sektorom djelatnosti u kojem bilo kakva intervencija, zakonodavna ili financijska, može uzrokovati narušavanje tržišnog natjecanja.