natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is clear from this statement that the marketing payments were an integral part of the commercial relationship between the CCI and Ryanair for the operation and development of routes.
Iz te tvrdnje proizlazi da su plaćanja za marketing bila sastavni dio poslovnog odnosa između komore CCI i društva Ryanair u svrhu poslovanja na tim linijama i njihova razvoja.
Moreover, the Commission notes that the provisional operating accounts, based on which the flat-rate contribution granted to VTAN from 1 January 2007 was calculated, take into account the payments made to Ryanair and AMS, with fixed amounts of around EUR 1,6 million per year on average throughout the term of the CDSP, in the reference scenario.
Usto, Komisija podsjeća da su u referentnom scenariju predviđenim financijskim izvještajima poslovanja na temelju kojih je utvrđen paušalni doprinos koji se od 1. siječnja 2007. dodjeljivao društvu VTAN uzeta u obzir plaćanja društvima Ryanair i AMS na temelju prosječnih paušalnih iznosa u visini od oko 1,6 milijuna EUR godišnje tijekom cijelog trajanja ugovora CDSP.
The Commission therefore understands that the marketing payments made to Ryanair/AMS were regarded by VTAN and the SMAN as an integral part of the commercial framework between the airport and Ryanair.
Komisija stoga razumije da su društvo VTAN i sindikat SMAN smatrali plaćanja za marketing društvu Ryanair/AMS sastavnim dijelom poslovnog okvira Zračne luke i društva Ryanair.
An examination of each marketing services agreement signed by AMS also reveals the extremely close link between each of these agreements and the airport services agreement signed in parallel by Ryanair.
Ispitivanje svakog ugovora o marketinškim uslugama koji je sklopilo društvo AMS pokazalo je i da je usko povezan s ugovorom o uslugama zračne luke koji se istodobno sklopio s društvom Ryanair.
Accordingly, the marketing services agreement signed between the CCI and AMS on 10 October 2005 was concluded for a term of five years, just like the airport services agreement signed on the same date.
Stoga je Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen 10. listopada 2005. između komore CCI i društva AMS potpisan na pet godina, kao i ugovor o uslugama zračne luke sklopljen istoga dana.
Moreover, it stipulates, in relation to its object, that it ‘is based on Ryanair’s commitment’ to operate certain routes, which are identical to those referred to in the airport services agreement.
Usto, u njegovom je predmetu utvrđeno da se „temelji na obvezi” prijevoznika Ryanair da upravlja određenim linijama, i to istim onima koje su navedene u ugovoru o uslugama zračne luke.
This wording unequivocally shows that the marketing services agreement would very likely not have existed if Ryanair had not operated the routes covered by the airport services agreement.
Ta rečenica nedvosmisleno upućuje na to da ugovor o marketinškim uslugama vrlo vjerojatno ne bi postojao da Ryanair ne posluje na linijama predviđenima ugovorom o uslugama zračne luke.
The preamble to the marketing services agreement also states as follows:‘… [Airport Marketing Services] is the only company that has the potential and technical ability to target large numbers of potential Ryanair passengers in order to promote the tourist and business attractions in the region’.
U preambuli Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama nadalje je navedeno sljedeće: „[…] Airport Marketing Services Limited jedino je društvo koje ima potencijal i tehnički kapacitet da cilja veliki broj potencijalnih putnika društva RYANAIR kako bi promicao turističke i poslovne atrakcije u regiji”.
This wording tends to confirm that the primary objective of the marketing services agreement is not to promote Nîmes and its region in general, but, much more specifically, to maximise sales of Ryanair tickets to Nîmes by promoting this region.
Svrha je te rečenice potvrditi da ključni cilj Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama nije općenita promidžba Nîmesa i njegove regije, nego, znatno određenije, promidžbom te regije što više povećati prodaju karata društva Ryanair u smjeru odredišta Nîmes.
Furthermore, according to the marketing services agreement, the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting messages and links on the Nîmes destination page of the Ryanair website, and inserting a link to the website designated by the CCI on the English homepage of the same website.
S druge strane, u skladu s Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama, usluge koje AMS treba pružiti obuhvaćaju postavljanje poruka i poveznica na stranicu namijenjenu odredištu Nîmes na web-mjestu društva Ryanair i postavljanje poveznice koja vodi na web-mjesto koje je odredila komora CCI na engleskoj početnoj stranici istog web-mjesta.
However, the Nîmes destination page of the Ryanair website is mainly targeted at people who have already decided to use or are likely to consider using Ryanair’s services to Nîmes.
Međutim, stranica namijenjena odredištu Nîmes na web-mjestu društva Ryanair namijenjena je uglavnom osobama koje su se već odlučile poslužiti ili koje bi se mogle poslužiti uslugama društva Ryanair u smjeru odredišta Nîmes.
This further indicates that the marketing services are essentially designed to promote Ryanair’s services between Nîmes and London, and not equally passenger traffic to Nîmes and its region.
To je dodatni pokazatelj da su marketinške usluge osmišljene uglavnom kako bi se osigurala promidžba usluga društva Ryanair između Nîmesa i Londona, a ne neselektivna promidžba posjeta Nîmesu i njegovoj regiji.
If they were designed to promote Nîmes and its region to all tourists and business travellers likely to be interested in the region, the CCI would in all likelihood have asked for the link to a website of its choosing to be placed on all, or at least several versions of, the Ryanair website homepage, and not just the English version.
Naime, ako je svrha tih usluga promicati Nîmes i njegovu regiju pred svim turistima i poslovnim osobama koje bi mogle iskazati interes za tu regiju, vjerojatno je da bi komora CCI zatražila da poveznica na web-mjesto po njezinu izboru bude postavljena na svim verzijama ili barem na više verzija početnih stranica web-mjesta društva Ryanair, a ne samo na engleskoj verziji.
Lastly, the marketing services agreement of 10 October 2005 stipulates about itself as follows: ‘As it is rooted in Ryanair presence in Nimes airport, this agreement will be terminated if Ryanair ceases to be present in Nimes airport for any reason or if the airport services agreement between Ryanair and [CCI] dated 10 October 2005 is terminated’.
Naposljetku, Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama od 10. listopada 2005. utvrđeno je sljedeće u pogledu samog Ugovora: „Budući da se temelji na prisutnosti društva RYANAIR u Zračnoj luci Nîmes, ovaj će se Ugovor raskinuti ako društvo RYANAIR iz bilo kojeg razloga prestane biti prisutno u Zračnoj luci Nîmes ili ako se raskine Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke od 10. listopada 2005. između društva RYANAIR i [komore CCI]”.
This provision clearly links the applicability of the two agreements and therefore highlights the link between them.
Tom je odredbom jasno povezana primjenjivost obaju ugovora te je time naglašena njihova međusobna povezanost.
Similar elements can be found in the marketing services agreements signed by VTAN and AMS on 2 January 2007, 1 November 2007 and 27 August 2008. Each of these agreements was in fact concluded for an identical term to that of the airport services agreement signed on the same date.
Slični su elementi navedeni u Ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama koje su društva VTAN i AMS sklopila 2. siječnja 2007., 1. studenoga 2007. i 27. kolovoza 2008.. Naime, svaki od tih ugovora sklopljen je na jednako razdoblje kao i ugovor o uslugama zračne luke potpisan istoga dana.
Moreover, each of these agreements explicitly stipulates that it is rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate certain routes, accompanied by certain frequencies, which are identical to those indicated in the corresponding airport services agreement.
Usto, u svakom od tih ugovora izričito je navedeno da se „temelji na obvezi društva Ryanair da upravlja” određenim linijama s određenim brojem letova koji su jednako navedeni u povezanom ugovoru o uslugama zračne luke.
The preamble of each of these agreements also states as follows: ‘… [Airport Marketing Services] is the only company that has the potential and technical ability to target large numbers of potential Ryanair passengers in order to promote the tourist and business attractions in the region’.
U preambuli svakog od tih ugovora nadalje je navedeno sljedeće: „[…] Airport Marketing Services Limited jedino je društvo koje ima potencijal i tehnički kapacitet da cilja veliki broj potencijalnih putnika društva RYANAIR kako bi promicao turističke i poslovne atrakcije u regiji”.
Furthermore, according to these marketing services agreements, the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting messages and links on the Nîmes destination page of the Ryanair website, inserting a link to the website designated by the CCI on the English, Belgian and Dutch homepages of the same website (quite clearly reflecting the points of origin of the Ryanair air routes to Nîmes airport) and, in certain cases, inserting a ‘button’ on the ‘Discover Europe’ page of the website.
S druge strane, u skladu s tim ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama, usluge koje AMS treba pružiti obuhvaćaju postavljanje poruka i poveznica na stranicu namijenjenu odredištu Nîmes na web-mjestu društva Ryanair, postavljanje poveznice koja vodi na web-mjesta koja je odredila komora CCI na engleskoj, belgijskoj i nizozemskoj početnoj stranici istog web-mjesta (na kojoj su jasno istaknute polazišne točke zračnih linija društva Ryanair prema Zračnoj luci Nîmes) te, u određenim slučajevima, „gumb” na stranici „Discover Europe” tog web-mjesta.
The ‘Discover Europe’ page is easily accessible from all versions of the Ryanair homepage.
Stranici „Discover Europe” može se lako pristupiti sa svih verzija početne stranice web-mjesta društva Ryanair.
Although it promotes the attractions of various destinations by means of ‘buttons’, it specifically promotes Ryanair flights to those destinations.
Iako se na toj stranici putem „gumba” promiču atrakcije različitih odredišta, na njoj se prije svega promiču letovi društva Ryanair prema tim odredištima.
The marketing services are therefore, once again, primarily targeted at those people who are most likely to use Ryanair’s services to Nîmes.
Stoga su i tu marketinške usluge prvenstveno usmjerene na osobe koje će se vjerojatno služiti uslugama društva Ryanair prema Nîmesu.
On reading the amendment of 30 November 2010 and the email exchanges between Ryanair and VTAN that gave rise to this amendment, and in the light of the explanations provided by France, it appears that Ryanair made the operation of three weekly services instead of two on the Nîmes-Liverpool route during the 2011 summer season conditional upon the additional marketing payment of EUR [35000-65000] stipulated in the amendment.
S obzirom na obrazloženja Francuske, iz izmjene od 30. studenoga 2010. te elektroničke pošte između društava Ryanair i VTAN na temelju koje je došlo do te izmjene proizlazi da je društvo Ryanair uvjetovalo upravljanje trima tjednim letovima umjesto dvama na liniji Nîmes – Liverpool tijekom ljetne sezone 2011. dodatnim plaćanjem za marketing od [35000 – 65000] EUR koje je predviđeno u izmjeni.
An email from a Ryanair representative to a VTAN representative dated 29 November 2010 indicates in particular: ‘Yes the … frequencies will be there for … and in return you will give us the …’.
U poruci e-pošte predstavnika društva Ryanair predstavniku društva VTAN od 29. studenoga 2010. bilo je, među ostalim, navedeno sljedeće: „Da, uvest ćemo […] let za […], a u zamjenu ćete nam dati […]”.
This email illustrates the close link between Ryanair and AMS, by showing that Ryanair was negotiating conditions with VTAN that concerned both the airport services and the marketing services provided and billed by AMS.
Tom je porukom e-pošte prikazana uska povezanost između društava Ryanair i AMS jer je vidljivo da Ryanair pregovara s društvom VTAN o uvjetima koji se istodobno odnose na usluge zračne luke i marketinške usluge koje pruža i obračunava AMS.
Once again, the existence of a close link between the amendment and certain routes operated by Ryanair (in this case, Nîmes-Liverpool) cannot be disputed.
Jednako tako, nije moguće dovesti u pitanje usku povezanost između izmjene i određenih linija kojima upravlja Ryanair (u ovom slučaju Nîmes – Liverpool).
The same is true for the amendment of 1 August 2007, which, according to France, ‘was a condition for the Ryanair service to Charleroi to be maintained for the 2007-2008 winter season’.
Isto vrijedi i za izmjenu od 1. kolovoza 2007., kojom je, prema mišljenju Francuske, „uvjetovano zadržavanje linije društva Ryanair prema Charleroiu tijekom zimske sezone 2007. – 2008.”.
These elements of the various marketing services agreements show that the marketing services stipulated in these agreements are, in terms of both their duration and their nature, closely linked to the air transport services offered by Ryanair, as defined in the marketing services agreements and covered by the corresponding airport services agreements.
Ti elementi povezani s različitim ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama upućuju na to da su marketinške usluge iz tih različitih ugovora usko povezane u pogledu njihova trajanja i vrste s uslugama zračnog prijevoza koje nudi Ryanair i koje su navedene u ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama te su predmet odgovarajućih ugovora o uslugama zračne luke.
The marketing services agreements even indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate the transport services in question.
U ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama navedeno je i da proizlaze iz obveze društva Ryanair da upravlja dotičnim prijevoznim uslugama.
Far from being designed to generally and equally increase travel to Nîmes and its region by tourists and business travellers, the marketing services specifically target those persons likely to use the Ryanair transport services covered by the marketing services agreements, and therefore have the primary objective of promoting those services.
Iako nisu osmišljene kako bi turisti i poslovni putnici općenito i nedvojbeno više posjećivali Nîmes i njegovu regiju, marketinške su usluge usmjerene posebno na osobe koje bi se mogle služiti prijevoznim uslugama društva Ryanair koje su predviđene ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama te je njihov glavni cilj promicati te usluge.
The marketing services agreements are therefore indissociable from the airport services agreements signed at the same time and from the air transport services that form their purpose.
Ugovori o marketinškim uslugama stoga su neodvojivi od istodobno sklopljenih ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i od usluga zračnog prijevoza koje su predmet tih ugovora.
The facts presented in the above recitals also indicate that, in the absence of the air routes in question (and therefore the associated airport services agreements), the marketing services agreements would not have been signed.
Iz činjenica iznesenih u prethodnim uvodnim izjavama tim više proizlazi da kada ne bi bilo dotičnih zračnih linija (a time ni ugovora o uslugama zračne luke koji se na njih odnose), ugovori o marketinškim uslugama ne bi bili sklopljeni.
As stated in recital 321, the marketing services agreements explicitly indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate certain air routes. They also provide for marketing services that are essentially intended to promote those routes.
Naime, kao što je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 321., u ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama izričito se navodi i da proizlaze iz obveze društva Ryanair da upravlja određenim zračnim linijama te su tim ugovorima predviđene marketinške usluge čija je svrha osigurati promidžbu tih linija.
In this respect, the Operators’ argument that these two types of agreement should be analysed separately because they ‘have very different objects and the conditions of one do not in any way depend on the conditions of the other’ is without merit.
U tom je pogledu bespredmetan argument Upravitelja da se te dvije vrste ugovora trebaju zasebno analizirati jer su, „naime, njihovi predmeti vrlo različiti, a uvjeti jednog ugovora nipošto ne ovise o uvjetima drugog”.
It is in fact clear from the above that the marketing services agreements form an integral part, together with the airport services agreements, of the commercial relations between Ryanair and the Operators with regard to the operation of those air routes covered by these two types of agreement.
Naime, iz prethodno navedenog jasno slijedi da su ugovori o marketinškim uslugama, zajedno s ugovorima o uslugama zračne luke, sastavni dio poslovnog odnosa između društva Ryanair i Upravitelja kojim je uređeno upravljanje zračnim linijama iz tih dviju vrsta ugovora.
Furthermore, it seems that, before signing the marketing services agreements in question, the Operators did not organise an invitation to tender nor did they consult various potential providers in order to compare their offers.
Nadalje, čini se da prije potpisivanja dotičnih ugovora o marketinškim uslugama Upravitelji nisu objavili javni natječaj, a nisu čak ni razmotrili različite potencijalne pružatelje usluga kako bi usporedili njihove ponude.
More generally, they did not consider any providers other than AMS for the services in question.
Općenito gledano, za predmetne usluge nisu predvidjeli druge pružatelje usluga osim društva AMS.
This confirms the existence of the close link of dependency between the marketing services agreements and the air routes operated by Ryanair from Nîmes airport.
Time je potkrijepljeno postojanje uske povezanosti ugovora o marketinškim uslugama sa zračnim linijama s polaskom iz Zračne luke Nîmes kojima upravlja Ryanair.
If the marketing services agreements had been truly independent of the airport services agreements, the Operators would in all likelihood have consulted other providers in addition to AMS.
Naime, da su ugovori o marketinškim uslugama zaista bili neovisni o ugovorima o uslugama zračne luke, Upravitelji bi vrlo vjerojatno, osim društvu AMS, uputili upite različitim pružateljima usluga.
In conclusion, given all the above, each marketing services agreement and the corresponding airport services agreement should be analysed as a single measure in order to determine whether this agreement constitutes State aid.
Zaključno, s obzirom na sve prethodno navedeno, kako bi se utvrdilo predstavlja li taj ugovor o marketinškim uslugama državnu potporu, potrebno je svaki ugovor o marketinškim uslugama i odgovarajući ugovor o uslugama zračne luke analizirati kao jednu i jedinstvenu mjeru.
Method of applying the MEO test to the Operators in order to assess the marketing services agreements
Način primjene načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu na Upravitelje za potrebe analize ugovora o marketinškim uslugama
In order to apply the MEO test to the marketing services agreements, the hypothetical MEO to be used for analysing the conduct of the Operators must be identified.
Radi primjene načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu na ugovore o marketinškim uslugama potrebno je utvrditi na koji se pretpostavljeni tržišni subjekt treba pozvati za potrebe analize ponašanja Upravitelja.
One approach would be to consider that the Operators signed the marketing services agreements as airport operators, and therefore to compare their conduct with that of a hypothetical airport operator motivated by the prospect of profits.
Kod prvog se rješenja polazi od toga da su Upravitelji sklopili ugovore o marketinškim uslugama u svojstvu upravitelja zračne luke te se, prema tome, njihovo ponašanje uspoređuje s onim pretpostavljenog upravitelja zračne luke koji se vodi izgledima za profitabilnost.
Another approach would be to consider that the Operators acted as bodies entrusted with a general interest task, namely the economic development of Nîmes and its region, and that they purchased these marketing services in order to perform that task, regardless of their capacity as the operator of Nîmes airport.
Kod drugog rješenja polazi se od toga da su Upravitelji djelovali u svojstvu subjekata zaduženih za zadatak od općeg interesa, odnosno za gospodarski razvoj Nîmesa i njegove regije te da su marketinške usluge kupili radi provedbe tog zadatka, neovisno o svojem svojstvu upravitelja Zračne luke Nîmes.
This second approach would be based in the fact that the CCI is invested by law with such an economic development task, whilst, according to France, VTAN was entrusted with this task by the SMAN through the CDSP.
To se drugo rješenje temelji na činjenici da je komora CCI za takav zadatak gospodarskog razvoja zadužena na temelju zakona, dok je sindikat SMAN, prema mišljenju Francuske, za taj zadatak zadužio društvo VTAN putem ugovora CDSP.
As indicated above, according to France and the Operators, the CDSP entrusted VTAN with the task of the ‘economic and tourism development of the area’.
Naime, kao što je prethodno navedeno, prema mišljenju Francuske i Upravitelja, društvo VTAN je ugovorom CDSP zaduženo za zadatak „gospodarskog i turističkog razvoja područja”.
In the context of this second approach, according to the case-law, it would need to be verified, firstly, that the services in question met the ‘actual needs’ of the public purchaser and, secondly, that they were purchased at a price equal to or below a ‘market price’, i.e. that an MEO motivated by the prospect of profits and needing equivalent services (without necessarily being an airport operator) would have been prepared to accept similar conditions to those accepted by the Operators.
U okviru tog drugog pristupa potrebno je u skladu sa sudskom praksom provjeriti, s jedne strane, odgovaraju li dotične usluge „stvarnim potrebama” javnog kupca i, s druge strane, jesu li one kupljene po cijeni koja je niža ili jednaka „tržišnoj cijeni”, odnosno bi li subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji se vodi izgledima za profitabilnost i koji treba jednakovrijedne usluge (a da nije nužno upravitelj zračne luke) bio spreman prihvatiti uvjete slične onima koje su prihvatili Upravitelji.
The comments of certain interested third parties tend to favour the second approach, at least implicitly.
Neke treće zainteresirane osobe u svojim su primjedbama pokazale, barem implicitno, sklonost drugom rješenju.
In particular, notably in its study of 20 December 2013, Ryanair has provided information intended to show that the price of the AMS marketing services did not exceed what may be regarded as a market price for such services. Further to this argument, it has noted that airport operators cannot be distinguished from other types of AMS customer.
Konkretno, Ryanair je, posebno u svojoj studiji od 20. prosinca 2013., iznio elemente čija je svrha dokazati da cijene marketinških usluga društva AMS nisu veće od cijena koje se mogu smatrati tržišnim cijenama za takve usluge, dodajući tom argumentu da se upravitelji zračnih luka ne razlikuju od ostalih vrsta klijenata društva AMS.
As regards the period after 31 December 2006, the Operators have provided information along the same lines, in particular: ‘it should be recalled that, during the VTAN operating period, all or part of the AMS expenditure was actually incurred within the context of VTAN’s public service mission to promote the area and its economic and tourism development’.
Upravitelji su u pogledu razdoblja nakon 31. prosinca 2006. dostavili elemente u istom smislu u kojima je navedeno sljedeće: „valja podsjetiti da su tijekom razdoblja upravljanja društva VTAN svi troškovi društva AMS ili dio njih stvarno nastali u okviru zadatka pružanja javne usluge društva VTAN u svrhu promidžbe područja te gospodarskog i turističkog razvoja”.