natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards cyromazine, such an application was submitted for ‘lettuces and salad plants’, ‘spinaches and similar leaves’ and ‘herbs and edible flowers’.
U pogledu ciromazina takav je zahtjev podnesen za „salate i salatno bilje”, „špinat i slične listove” i „začinsko bilje i jestive cvjetove”.
As regards dazomet, such an application was submitted for fruits of code number 0100000, carrots, radishes, fruiting vegetables (except sweetcorn), leafy brassica, ‘lettuces and salad plants’ and ‘spinaches and similar leaves’.
U pogledu dazometa takav je zahtjev podnesen za plodove pod brojčanom oznakom 0100000, mrkve, rotkve, plodovito povrće (osim slatkog kukuruza), lisnate kupusnjače, „salate i salatno bilje” i „špinat i slične listove”.
As regards fluazifop-P, such an application was submitted for celeriac, Jerusalem artichokes, peas (without pods), globe artichokes, dry beans, lentils, lupins, linseeds, poppy seeds, safflower seeds, herbal infusion (dried roots) and spices (roots or rhizome).
U pogledu fluazifop-P-a takav je zahtjev podnesen za celer korjenaš, čičoke, grašak (bez mahuna), artičoke, sušeni grah, leću, lupine, sjemenke lana, sjemenke maka, sjemenke šafranike, biljne infuzije (osušeno korijenje) i začine (korijenje ili podanak).
As regards mepanipyrim, such an application was submitted for strawberries, tomatoes, aubergines and cucumbers.
U pogledu mepanipirima takav je zahtjev podnesen za jagode, rajčice, patlidžane i krastavce.
As regards metrafenone, such an application was submitted for hops.
U pogledu metrafenona takav je zahtjev podnesen za hmelj.
As regards picloram, such an application was submitted for borage.
U pogledu piklorama takav je zahtjev podnesen za borač.
As regards propamocarb, such an application was submitted for garlic, onions and shallots.
U pogledu propamokarba takav je zahtjev podnesen za češnjake, crveni luk i ljutike.
As regards pyridaben, such an application was submitted for cucurbits (edible peel).
U pogledu piridabena takav je zahtjev podnesen za tikvenjače (jestiva kora).
As regards pyriofenone, such an application was submitted for table grapes.
U pogledu piriofenona takav je zahtjev podnesen za stolno grožđe.
As regards tebuconazole, such an application was submitted for cucumbers and courgettes.
U pogledu tebukonazola takav je zahtjev podnesen za krastavce i tikvice.
As regards tebufenpyrad, such an application was submitted for citrus fruits, plums, strawberries, tomatoes, peppers, aubergines, gherkins, melons and watermelons.
U pogledu tebufenpirada takav je zahtjev podnesen za agrume, šljive, jagode, rajčice, paprike, patlidžane, male krastavce za kiseljenje, dinje i lubenice.
In accordance with Article 6(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 an application was submitted for thiram used on avocados.
U skladu s člankom 6. stavcima 2. i 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 podnesen je zahtjev za uporabu tirama na avokadu.
The applicant claims that the authorised uses of that substance on such crop in Australia and New Zealand lead to residues exceeding the MRL contained in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that a higher MRL is necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of that crop.
Podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdi da zbog odobrene uporabe te tvari na takvoj kulturi u Australiji i na Novom Zelandu ostaci prekoračuju MRO iz Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 te da je potreban viši MRO kako bi se izbjegle trgovinske zapreke pri uvozu te kulture.
In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 these applications were evaluated by the Member States concerned and the evaluation reports were forwarded to the Commission.
U skladu s člankom 8. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005, te su zahtjeve ocijenile dotične države članice i Komisiji proslijedile izvješća o ocjenama.
The European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, assessed the applications and the evaluation reports, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and, where relevant, to animals and gave reasoned opinions on the proposed MRLs [2].
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane, dalje u tekstu: „Agencija”, ocijenila je zahtjeve i izvješća o ocjeni, posebno ispitavši opasnosti za potrošače i, prema potrebi, za životinje te je dala obrazložena mišljenja o predloženim MRO-ovima [2].
The Authority concluded in its reasoned opinions that, as regards the use of cyromazine on scarole and the use of tebufenpyrad on peppers, a risk to the consumer cannot be excluded.
Agencija je u svojim obrazloženim mišljenjima zaključila da se u pogledu uporabe ciromazina na širokolisnoj endiviji i tebufenpirada na paprikama ne može isključiti rizik za potrošače.
As regards the use of cyromazine on lamb's lettuce and fresh herbs, the use of dazomet on fruits and the use of tebufenpyrad on plums, gherkins, melons and watermelons, the submitted data support lower MRLs than the existing ones.
U pogledu uporabe ciromazina na matovilcu i svježem začinskom bilju, uporabe dazometa na plodovima i uporabe tebufenpirada na šljivama, malim krastavcima za kiseljenje, dinjama i lubenicama u podnesenim podacima potvrđuju se niži MRO-ovi od postojećih.
However, since it needs to be verified whether these lower MRLs adequately reflect the critical Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) used in the EU and given that the existing MRLs are safe to the consumer, it is appropriate not to lower the existing MRLs in the framework of the current Regulation, but to use the information derived from the submitted data when reviewing all existing MRLs for those substances.
Međutim, s obzirom na to da treba provjeriti odražavaju li prikladno ti niži MRO-ovi kritičnu dobru poljoprivrednu praksu (GAP) upotrebljavanu u EU-u te budući da su postojeći MRO-ovi sigurni za potrošače, nije prikladno smanjiti postojeće MRO-ove u okviru postojeće Uredbe, nego pri pregledavanju svih postojećih MRO-ova za te tvari koristiti se informacijama dobivenima iz podnesenih podataka.
For dithiocarbamates, the Authority concluded that a new MRL for avocados needs to be set at the level of 7 mg/kg to adequately address the use of thiram on such a crop.
Za ditiokarbamate Agencija je zaključila da se novi MRO za avokado treba odrediti na razini od 7 mg/kg za prikladno rješavanje uporabe tirama na takvoj kulturi.
The proposed MRL is considered safe to the consumer.
Predloženi MRO smatra se sigurnim za potrošače.
As regards all other applications, the Authority concluded that all requirements with respect to data were met and that the modifications to the MRLs requested by the applicants were acceptable with regard to consumer safety on the basis of a consumer exposure assessment for 27 specific European consumer groups.
U pogledu svih ostalih zahtjeva Agencija je zaključila da su s obzirom na podatke svi zahtjevi ispunjeni i da su izmjene MRO-ova koje su zatražili podnositelji zahtjeva prihvatljive u odnosu na sigurnost potrošača na temelju ocjene izloženosti potrošača za 27 specifičnih europskih potrošačkih skupina.
For sulfoxaflor, the Authority submitted a conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sulfoxaflor [3].
Za sulfoksaflor Agencija je podnijela zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene opasnosti od pesticida s aktivnom tvari sulfoksaflor [3].
In that framework, it recommended to set MRLs covering both the representative uses according to GAPs in the Union and import tolerance requests from several third countries.
U tom okviru Agencija je preporučila da se MRO-ovi odrede tako da ispunjuju i normu reprezentativne uporabe prema dobroj poljoprivrednoj praksi u Uniji i zahtjeve za uvozna odstupanja iz nekoliko trećih zemalja.
The Commission consulted the European Union reference laboratories on the appropriate limits of determination (LODs).
Komisija je zatražila mišljenje referentnih laboratorija Europske unije o potrebnim granicama određivanja (LOD-ovi).
EFSA scientific reports available online:
Znanstvena izvješća Europske agencije za sigurnost hrane (EFSA) dostupna su na internetu:
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sulfoxaflor.
Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene opasnosti od pesticida s aktivnom tvari sulfoksaflor.
EFSA Journal 2014;12(5):3692[170 pp.].
EFSA Journal 2014.;12(5):3692 (170 str.).
In Annex II, the columns for bifenazate, cyazofamid, cyromazine, dithiocarbamates, mepanipyrim, metrafenone, propamocarb, tebuconazole and thiram are replaced by the following:
U Prilogu II. stupci koji se odnose na bifenazat, ciazofamid, ciromazin, ditiokarbamate, mepanipirim, metrafenon, propamokarb, tebukonazol i tiram zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
Bifenazate (sum of bifenazate plus bifenazate-diazene expressed as bifenazate) (F)
Bifenazat (zbroj bifenazata i bifenazat-diazena izražen kao bifenazat) (F)
(+) The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(+) Primjenjiva maksimalna razina ostataka za hren (Armoracia rusticana) u skupini začina (brojčana oznaka 0840040) razina je koja je utvrđena za hren (Armoracia rusticana) u kategoriji povrća, skupini korjenastog i gomoljastog povrća (brojčana oznaka 0213040) uzimajući u obzir promjene u razinama do kojih dolazi preradom (sušenje) u skladu s člankom 20. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005.
When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 April 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
Pri preispitivanju MRO-a Komisija će uzeti u obzir informacije iz prve rečenice ako su dostavljene do 23. travnja 2016. ili nedostatak informacija ako nisu dostavljene do tog datuma,
When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 25 January 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
Pri preispitivanju MRO-a Komisija će uzeti u obzir informacije iz prve rečenice ako su dostavljene do 25. siječnja 2016. ili nedostatak informacija ako nisu dostavljene do tog datuma,
It is therefore not appropriate to use these MRLs to check compliance with a GAP.
Stoga nije primjereno koristiti navedene MRO-ove za provjeru usklađenosti s GAP-om.
code 1000000 except 1016000, 1030000 and 1040000:
brojčana oznaka 1000000 osim 1016000, 1030000 i 1040000:
N-oxide propamocarb;
N-oksid propamokarb;
codes 1016000 and 1030000:
brojčane oznake 1016000 i 1030000:
N-desmethyl propamocarb
N-dezmetil propamokarb
When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
Pri preispitivanju MRO-a Komisija će uzeti u obzir informacije iz prve rečenice ako su dostavljene do 22. ožujka 2016. ili nedostatak informacija ako nisu dostavljene do tog datuma,
When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
Pri preispitivanju MRO-a Komisija će uzeti u obzir informacije iz prve rečenice ako su dostavljene do 22. ožujka 2016. ili nedostatak informacija ako nisu dostavljene do tog datuma,
tebuconazole-code 1000000 except 1040000:
tebukonazol – brojčana oznaka 1000000 osim 1040000:
sum of tebuconazole, hydroxy-tebuconazole, and their conjugates, expressed as tebuconazole
zbroj tebukonazola, hidroksi-tebukonazola i njihovih konjugata, izražen kao tebukonazol
Thiram (expressed as thiram)
Tiram (izražen kao tiram)
As all dithiocarbamates result in the final CS2 residue, discrimination among them is generally not possible.
S obzirom na to da svi ditiokarbamati dovode do konačnog ostatka CS2, u načelu ih nije moguće razlikovati.
However single residue methods are available for propineb, ziram and thiram.
Međutim postoje metode za pojedinačne ostatke za propineb, ziram i tiram.
These methods should be implemented on a case by case basis when the specific quantification of propineb, ziram and/or thiram is required.’
Ove metode treba primjenjivati od slučaja do slučaja kada je potrebno zasebno odrediti količine za propineb, ziram i /ili tiram.”
grape leaves and similar species
(c ) listovi vinove loze i slične vrste
Annex III is amended as follows:
2. Prilog III. izmjenjuje se kako slijedi:
In Part A, the columns for boscalid, dazomet, fluazifop-P, picloram, pyridaben, pyriofenone and tebufenpyrad are replaced by the following:
U dijelu A stupci koji se odnose na boskalid, dazomet, fluazifop-P, pikloram, piridaben, piriofenon i tebufenpirad zamjenjuju se sljedećima:
Boscalid (F) (R)
Boskalid (F) (R)
Boscalid — code 1000000 except 1040000:
Boskalid – brojčana oznaka 1000000 osim 1040000:
Sum of boscalid and metabolite 2-chloro-N-(4′-chloro-5-hydroxybiphenyl-2-yl)nicotinamide (M 510F01) including its conjugates expressed as boscalid
Zbroj boskalida i metabolita 2-klor-N- (4-klor-5-hidroksibifenil-2-il) nikotinamid (M 510F01) uključujući njegove konjugate izražen kao boskalid
Dazomet (Methylisothiocyanate resulting from the use of dazomet and metam)
Dazomet (metil izotiocijanat koji proizlazi iz uporabe dazometa i metama)
Fluazifop-P-butyl (fluazifop acid (free and conjugate))
Fluazifop-P-butil (fluazifop kiselina (slobodna i konjugat))
Picloram
Pikloram
Pyridaben (F)
Piridaben (F)
In Part A, the following column for sulfoxaflor is added:
U dijelu A dodaje se sljedeći stupac koji se odnosi na sulfoksaflor:
Sulfoxaflor (sum of isomers)
Sulfoksaflor (zbroj izomera)
In Part B, the columns for dithiocarbamates and thiram are replaced by the following:
U dijelu B stupci za ditiokarbamate i tiram zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
These methods should be implemented on a case by case basis when the specific quantification of propineb, ziram and/or thiram is required.
Ove metode treba primjenjivati od slučaja do slučaja kada je potrebno zasebno odrediti količine za propineb, ziram i /ili tiram.
Pesticide-code combination for which the MRL as set in Annex III Part B applies.
Kombinacija brojčane oznake i pesticida na koju se primjenjuje MRO utvrđen u Prilogu III., dijelu B,
http://www.efsa.europa.euReasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for bifenazate in blueberries, cranberries, gooseberries and azaroles (kiwiberries).
http://www.efsa.europa.euObrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih maksimalnih razina ostataka (MRO) za bofenazat u borovnicama, brusnicama, ogrozdima i azarolama (sibirski kivi).
EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4047 [20 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for boscalid in beans and peas with pods.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4047 (20 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih maksimalnih razina ostataka (MRO-i) za boskalid u grahu i grašku s mahunama.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4045 [19 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for cyazofamid in aubergines.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4045 (19 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećeg MRO-a za ciazofamid u patlidžanima.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):3993 [19 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for cyromazine in various leaf vegetables and fresh herbs.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(1):3993 (19 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih MRO-ova za ciromazin u različitom lisnatom povrću i svježem začinskom bilju.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):4004[22 pp.].EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4049 [23 pp.].EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4059 [28 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for mepanipyrim in tomato, aubergine, strawberry and cucumber.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(1):4004 (22 str.).EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4049 (23 str.).EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4059 (28 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih maksimalnih razina ostataka (MRO-i) za mepanipirim u rajčicama, patlidžanima, jagodama i krastavcima.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4037 [24 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the setting of a new maximum residues level (MRL) for metrafenone in hop cones.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4037 (24 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o utvrđivanju nove maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za metrafenon u hmelju.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4078 [19 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue level (MRL) for picloram in borage and corn gromwell seeds.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(4):4078 (19 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojeće maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za pikloram u boraču i sjemenkama bijele biserke.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4062 [20 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue levels for propamocarb in onions, garlic, shallots and leeks.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4062 (20 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih maksimalnih razina ostataka za propamokarb u crvenom luku, češnjacima, ljutikama i porilucima.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4084 [20 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue level maximum residue level (MRL) for pyridaben in cucurbits — edible peel.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(4):4084 (20 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojeće maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za piridaben u tikvenjačama s jestivom korom.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4041 [21 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue level (MRL) for pyriofenone in table grapes.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4041 (21 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojeće maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za piriofenon u stolnom grožđu.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4071 [16 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for tebuconazole in cucumbers and courgettes.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(3):4071 (16 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih MRO-ova za tebukonazol u krastavcima i tikvicama.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):4000 [24 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for tebufenpyrad in various crops.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(1):4000 (24 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih MRO-ova za tebufenpirad u raznim kulturama.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4091 [29 pp.].Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for thiram in avocados.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(4):4091 (29 str.).Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećeg MRO-a za tiram u avokadu.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):4003 [21 pp.].
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(1):4003 (21 str.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2
of 4 January 2016
оd 4. siječnja 2016.
Done at Brussels, 4 January 2016.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 4. siječnja 2016.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/4
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/4
amending Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards essential requirements for environmental protection
o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 216/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu bitnih zahtjeva u pogledu zaštite okoliša
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC [1], and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 216/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 20. veljače 2008. o zajedničkim pravilima u području civilnog zrakoplovstva i osnivanju Europske agencije za sigurnost zračnog prometa i stavljanju izvan snage Direktive Vijeća 91/670/EEZ, Uredbe (EZ) br. 1592/2002 i Direktive 2004/36/EZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 6. stavak 2.,
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 requires products, parts and appliances to comply with the environmental protection requirements contained in Volumes I and II of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Chicago Convention’) as applicable on 17 November 2011, except for the Appendices to that Annex.
Člankom 6. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 216/2008 zahtijeva se da proizvodi, dijelovi i uređaji budu u skladu sa zahtjevima u pogledu zaštite okoliša iz svezaka I. i II. Priloga 16. Konvenciji o međunarodnom civilnom zrakoplovstvu (dalje u tekstu „Čikaška konvencija”), kako se primjenjuju na dan 17. studenoga 2011., osim dodataka tom Prilogu.
Volumes I and II of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention have been amended in 2014 by introducing new noise standards.
Svesci I. i II. Priloga 16. Čikaškoj konvenciji izmijenjeni su 2014. uvođenjem novih norma za buku.
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbu (EZ) br. 216/2008 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are based on the opinion issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency in accordance with Articles 17(2)(b) and 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom temelje se na mišljenju koje je izdala Europska agencija za sigurnost zračnog prometa u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 2. točkom (b) i člankom 19. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 216/2008.
In Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
U članku 6. Uredbe (EZ) br. 216/2008 stavak 1. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Products, parts and appliances shall comply with the environmental protection requirements contained in Amendment 11-B of Volume I and in Amendment 8 of Volume II of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention as applicable on 1 January 2015, except for the Appendices to Annex 16.’
Proizvodi, dijelovi i uređaji moraju biti u skladu sa zahtjevima u pogledu zaštite okoliša iz izmjene 11-B Sveska I. i izmjene 8. Sveska II. Priloga 16. Čikaškoj konvenciji, kako se primjenjuju na dan 1. siječnja 2015., osim dodataka Prilogu 16.”
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/5
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/5
amending Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 as regards the implementation of essential requirements for environmental protection
o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 748/2012 u pogledu provedbe bitnih zahtjeva za zaštitu okoliša
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC [1], and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 216/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 20. veljače 2008. o zajedničkim pravilima u području civilnog zrakoplovstva i osnivanju Europske agencije za sigurnost zrakoplovstva i stavljanju izvan snage Direktive Vijeća 91/670/EEZ, Uredbe (EZ) br. 1592/2002 i Direktive 2004/36/EZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 6. stavak 2.,
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 requires products, parts and appliances to comply with the environmental protection requirements contained in Volumes I and II of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Chicago Convention’) as applicable on 17 November 2011, except for Appendices to that Annex.
Člankom 6. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 216/2008 zahtijeva se da proizvodi, dijelovi i uređaji budu u skladu sa zahtjevima u pogledu zaštite okoliša iz svezaka I. i II. Priloga 16. Konvenciji o međunarodnom civilnom zrakoplovstvu (dalje u tekstu „Čikaška konvencija”), kako se primjenjuju na dan 17. studenoga 2011., osim dodataka tom Prilogu.
Those requirements were implemented in Union law by Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 [2].
Ti zahtjevi preneseni su u pravo Unije Uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 748/2012. [2]
Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbu (EU) br. 748/2012 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
In Annex I (Part-21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012, point 21.A.18(a) is replaced by the following:
U Prilogu I. (Part 21.) Uredbi (EU) br. 748/2012 točka 21.A.18. podtočka (a) zamjenjuje se sljedećim: