natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/1129 of 7 July 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/2/2015) (OJ L 184, 11.7.2015, p. 17).
Odluka Političkog i sigurnosnog odbora (ZVSP) 2015/1129 od 7. srpnja 2015. o produljenju mandata voditelja Policijske misije Europske unije za palestinska područja (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/2/2015) (SL L 184, 11.7.2015., str. 17.).
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2016/1194
Odluka Političkog i sigurnosnog odbora (ZVSP) 2016/1194
extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) (EU BAM Rafah/1/2016)
o produljenju mandata voditelja Misije pomoći Europske unije za granični prijelaz Rafah (EU BAM Rafah) (EU BAM Rafah/1/2016)
On 7 July 2015, the PSC adopted Decision EU BAM Rafah/1/2015 [2], appointing Ms Natalina CEA as Head of Mission of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016.
PSO je 7. srpnja 2015. donio Odluku EU BAM Rafah/1/2015 [2] kojom je gđa Natalina CEA imenovana voditeljicom misije EU BAM Rafah od 1. srpnja 2015. do 30. lipnja 2016.
On 7 July 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1107 [3], extending the mandate of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017.
Vijeće je 7. srpnja 2016. donijelo Odluku (ZVSP) 2016/1107 [3] kojom se mandat misije EU BAM Rafah produljuje od 1. srpnja 2016. do 30. lipnja 2017.
The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed to extend the mandate of Ms Natalina CEA as Head of Mission of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017,
Visoki predstavnik Unije za vanjske poslove i sigurnosnu politiku predložio je produljenje mandata gđe Nataline CEA kao voditeljice misije EUBAM Rafah od 1. srpnja 2016. do 30. lipnja 2017.,
The mandate of Ms Natalina CEA as Head of Mission of EU BAM Rafah is hereby extended from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017.
Mandat gđe Nataline CEA kao voditeljice misije EU BAM Rafah produljuje se od 1. srpnja 2016. do 30. lipnja 2017.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1195
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2016/1195
exempting courier services and other services than postal services in Poland from the application of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC
o izuzimanju kurirskih usluga i drugih usluga osim poštanskih usluga u Poljskoj od primjene Direktive 2014/25/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o nabavi subjekata koji djeluju u sektoru vodnog gospodarstva, energetskom i prometnom sektoru te sektoru poštanskih usluga i o stavljanju izvan snage Direktive 2004/17/EZ
(notified under document C(2016) 3986)
(priopćeno pod brojem dokumenta C(2016) 3986)
Having regard to Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC [1], and in particular Articles 34 and 35,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2014/25/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 26. veljače 2014. o nabavi subjekata koji djeluju u sektoru vodnog gospodarstva, energetskom i prometnom sektoru te sektoru poštanskih usluga i o stavljanju izvan snage Direktive 2004/17/EZ [1], a posebno njezine članke 34. i 35.,
Having regard to the request submitted by President of the Office of Electronic Communications on behalf of Poczta Polska S.A. by post and received on 2 February 2016,
uzimajući u obzir zahtjev koji je poštom podnio predsjednik Ureda za elektroničke komunikacije u ime Poczta Polske S.A. i koji je zaprimljen 2. veljače 2016.,
On 2 February 2016, the European Commission received by post a formal request from the President of the Office of Electronic Communications on behalf of Poczta Polska S.A. (hereinafter ‘the applicant’) pursuant to Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Dana 2. veljače 2016. Europska komisija poštom je zaprimila službeni zahtjev predsjednika Ureda za elektroničke komunikacije u ime Poczta Polske S.A. (dalje u tekstu: podnositelj zahtjeva) u skladu s člankom 35. stavkom 1. Direktive 2014/25/EU.
The request was accompanied by an opinion of the President of the Office of Electronic Communications that the services listed meet the conditions justifying their exemption on the basis of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Uz zahtjev je priloženo i mišljenje predsjednika Ureda za elektroničke komunikacije o tome da navedene usluge ispunjavaju uvjete kojima se opravdava njihovo izuzimanje na temelju članka 34. Direktive 2014/25/EU.
The Commission considers that this opinion does not qualify as a reasoned and substantiated position in the sense of Article 35(2) of Directive 2014/25/EU, since it is a simple statement that the mentioned conditions are met without providing any arguments in the support of that statement.
Komisija smatra da nije riječ o obrazloženom i opravdanom stajalištu u smislu članka 35. stavka 2. Direktive 2014/25/EU, nego o običnoj izjavi o ispunjavanju navedenih uvjeta bez navođenja argumenata u prilog tome.
Pursuant to the request, the Commission was asked to establish that the provisions of Directive 2014/25/EU, and the procurement procedures provided for in that Directive, did not apply to courier services and others services than postal services in Poland.
Na temelju zahtjeva od Komisije je zatraženo da utvrdi da se odredbe Direktive 2014/25/EU i postupci nabave iz te Direktive ne primjenjuju na kurirske usluge i druge usluge osim poštanskih usluga u Poljskoj.
The request was submitted by the competent authority — President of the Office of Electronic Communications, in accordance with Article 138f of the Public procurement law [2], at the request of Poczta Polska S.A. as contracting entity, with its registered office in Warsaw, and agreed with the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) and with the President of the Public Procurement Office (UZP).
Zahtjev je podnijelo nadležno tijelo – predsjednik Ureda za elektroničke komunikacije, u skladu s člankom 138.f Zakona o javnoj nabavi [2], na zahtjev naručitelja Poczta Polska S.A., čije se registrirano sjedište nalazi u Varšavi, a o podnesenom su se zahtjevu usuglasili predsjednik Ureda za tržišno natjecanje i zaštitu potrošača (UOKiK) i predsjednik Ureda za javnu nabavu (UZP).
In accordance with point 1 of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission has 105 working days to adopt the decision.
U skladu s točkom 1. Priloga IV. Direktive 2014/25/EU Komisija mora donijeti odluku u roku od 105 radnih dana.
The deadline expires on 7 July 2016.
Taj rok istječe 7. srpnja 2016.
According to Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU, contracts intended to enable one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14 of that Directive are not subject to that Directive if, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
U skladu s člankom 34. Direktive 2014/25/EU ugovori kojima se namjerava omogućiti obavljanje neke od djelatnosti koje se spominju u člancima od 8. do 14. te Direktive nisu predmet te Direktive ako je ta djelatnost, u državi članici u kojoj se obavlja, izravno izložena natjecanju na tržištima kojima pristup nije ograničen.
Access to a given market is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied Union legislation relating to the opening of the relevant market as set out in Annex III to Directive 2014/25/EU.
Smatra se da pristup određenom tržištu nije ograničen ako je država članica provela i primjenjuje zakonodavstvo Unije u pogledu otvaranja relevantnog tržišta, kao što je utvrđeno u Prilogu III. Direktive 2014/25/EU.
Pursuant to Point F of that Annex, Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] (hereafter ‘the Postal Services Directive’) (as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] and Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5]) constitutes relevant Union legislation relating to the opening of the postal services markets.
U skladu s točkom F tog Priloga, Direktiva 97/67/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3] (dalje u tekstu: „Direktiva o poštanskim uslugama”) (kako je izmijenjena Direktivom 2002/39/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4] i Direktivom 2008/6/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [5]) odgovarajući je propis Unije kojim se uređuje otvaranje tržišta poštanskih usluga.
Poland implemented the Postal Services Directive by the Law of 23 November 2012 — Postal law [6] which became applicable from 1 January 2013 with respect to services of the clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of courier items and services in respect of unaddressed mail items.
Poljska je provela Direktivu o poštanskim uslugama Zakonom od 23. studenoga 2012. – Zakonom o poštanskim uslugama [6] koji se primjenjuje od 1. siječnja 2013. u pogledu usluga pražnjenja, razvrstavanja, prijevoza i isporuke kurirskih pošiljaka i u pogledu usluga kad je riječ o rukovanju neadresiranim poštanskim pošiljkama.
For these services, Poland reached the sufficient level of market opening and access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted in accordance with Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Za te je usluge Poljska dostigla zadovoljavajući stupanj otvaranja tržišta te se pristup tom tržištu ne treba smatrati ograničenim u skladu s člankom 34. Direktive 2014/25/EU.
It can also be observed that none of the services for which the request has been submitted have been subject to statutory monopoly in the past.
Isto se tako može zaključiti da ni jedna od usluga za koje je podnesen zahtjev nije u prošlosti bila podložna zakonskom monopolu.
Only postal services defined in Article 7 of the Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC and Directive 2008/6/EC have been reserved for the designated universal service providers.
Samo su poštanske usluge iz članka 7. Direktive 97/67/EZ, kako je izmijenjena Direktivom 2002/39/EZ i Direktivom 2008/6/EZ, bile rezervirane za imenovane pružatelje univerzalne usluge.
With the implementation of the Directive 2008/6/EC all Member States, including Poland, completely liberalised their postal markets and, with the exception of services under Article 8 of the above Directive, no postal services should be subject to statutory monopoly.
Provedbom Direktive 2008/6/EZ sve su države članice, uključujući Poljsku, u potpunosti liberalizirale svoja poštanska tržišta i, uz iznimku usluga iz članka 8. navedene Direktive, ni jedna poštanska usluga ne bi trebala podlijegati zakonskom monopolu.
The request covers activities relating to the provision of postal services and other services than postal services on condition that such services are provided by an entity which also provides postal services, which are listed as being relevant under Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7], which was a legal basis on which the request was based.
Zahtjev obuhvaća djelatnosti povezane s pružanjem poštanskih usluga i drugih usluga osim poštanskih usluga uz uvjet da takve usluge pruža subjekt koji pruža i poštanske usluge, a koje su, prema Direktivi 2004/17/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [7], navedene kao važne, što je bila pravna osnova na kojoj se temeljio zahtjev.
These services are:
Riječ je o sljedećim uslugama:
clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of courier items;
pražnjenja, razvrstavanja, prijevoza i isporuke kurirskih pošiljaka;
printing and packaging services;
usluge tiskanja i pakiranja;
services in respect of unaddressed mail items;
usluge u pogledu rukovanja neadresiranim poštanskim pošiljkama;
services in respect of international money orders;
usluge u pogledu međunarodnih novčanih doznaka;
services in respect of payments to a bank account;
usluge u pogledu uplata na bankovni račun;
bureaux de change services;
usluge mjenjačnice;
brokering services in respect of the payment of pension benefits;
posredničke usluge u pogledu isplate mirovina;
services in respect of the sale of banking products;
usluge u pogledu prodaje bankarskih proizvoda;
services in respect of the sale of insurance products;
usluge u pogledu prodaje osiguravateljskih proizvoda;
services in respect of cash withdrawals using a payment card;
usluge u pogledu podizanja gotovine platnom karticom;
cash handling services;
usluge rukovanja gotovinom;
road freight transport services;
usluge cestovnog prijevoza tereta;
warehousing services.
usluge skladištenja.
Among the services, other than postal services, covered by the request, it is noted that the services listed from points 4 to 13 of the previous recital, although in the scope of the Directive 2004/17/EC, are not covered by Directive 2014/25/EU.
Kad je riječ o uslugama koje nisu poštanske usluge, a koje su obuhvaćene zahtjevom, napominje se da usluge navedene pod točkama od 4. do 13. prethodne uvodne izjave, iako obuhvaćene područjem primjene Direktive 2004/17/EZ, nisu obuhvaćene Direktivom 2014/25/EU.
For these services the legislator has already examined the competitive situation and found that it is such that the discipline of the later Directive is no longer needed in respect of procurement made for the pursuit of these activities which have consequently been excluded from its scope.
Za te je usluge zakonodavac već proučio stanje na tržištu i otkrio da više nije potrebno primjenjivati režim potonje Direktive u pogledu nabave koja se provodi radi obavljanja djelatnosti koje su shodno tome isključene iz njezina područja primjene.
Direct exposure to competition in a particular market is evaluated on the basis of various criteria, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Izravno izlaganje tržišnom natjecanju na određenom tržištu procjenjuje se na temelju različitih kriterija, od kojih ni jedan nije presudan sam po sebi.
In respect of the markets covered by the request, the market share of the main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account.
U pogledu tržišta na koja se odnosi ovaj zahtjev, jedan od kriterija koje bi trebalo uzeti u obzir je tržišni udio glavnih sudionika na određenom tržištu.
Finally, the question of possible barriers to entry may also be relevant.
Konačno, moglo bi biti važno i pitanje mogućih prepreka ulasku na tržište.
As the conditions vary for the different activities that are concerned by the request, the examination of the competitive situation should take into account the different situations in different markets.
S obzirom na to da se uvjeti za razne djelatnosti na koje se odnosi taj zahtjev razlikuju, za ispitivanje konkurentne situacije potrebno je uzeti u obzir različite okolnosti na različitim tržištima.
In particular, the criteria and the methodology used to assess direct exposure to competition under Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU are not necessarily identical to those used to perform an assessment under Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty or Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [8].
Konkretno, kriteriji i metodologija upotrebljeni za ocjenjivanje izravnog izlaganja tržišnom natjecanju na temelju članka 35. Direktive 2014/25/EU nisu nužno istovjetni onima upotrebljenima za ocjenjivanje na temelju članka 101. ili 102. Ugovora ili Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 139/2004 [8].
The applicant, Poczta Polska S.A., is a contracting entity in the meaning of the contracting entity within the meaning of Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2014/25/EU carrying out activity relating to postal services referred to in Article 13 of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Podnositelj zahtjeva, Poczta Polska S.A., naručitelj je u smislu članka 4. stavka 1. točke (a) Direktive 2014/25/EU i obavlja djelatnost povezanu s poštanskim uslugama iz članka 13. Direktive 2014/25/EU.
Undertakings associated with the contracting entity, at the request of which the applicant has submitted this request, which carry out the activity which is the basis of the request are the following undertakings: Pocztowe Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń Wzajemnych, Pocztowa Agencja Usług Finansowych S.A., Pocztylion-Arka Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A., Bank Pocztowy S.A.
Poduzeća povezana s naručiteljem, na čiji je zahtjev podnositelj zahtjeva podnio ovaj zahtjev, a koja obavljaju djelatnost koja je osnova tog zahtjeva sljedeća su: Pocztowe Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń Wzajemnych, Pocztowa Agencja Usług Finansowych S.A., Pocztylion-Arka Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A. i Bank Pocztowy S.A.
For the purpose of the assessment the relevant activities are the following:
U svrhu ocjenjivanja relevantne su aktivnosti sljedeće:
the services of clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of courier items;
usluge pražnjenja, razvrstavanja, prijevoza i isporuke kurirskih pošiljaka;
printing and packaging services.
usluga tiskanja i pakiranja.
Services of clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of courier items
Usluge pražnjenja, razvrstavanja, prijevoza i isporuke kurirskih pošiljaka
The Commission has held in previous decisions that the market for the mail delivery services can be segmented in basic postal service and an express or courier delivery service [9].
Komisija je već navela da se tržište usluga dostave pošte može segmentirati na osnovnu poštansku uslugu i uslugu hitne ili kurirske dostave [9].
In addition to faster and more reliable collection, transportation and delivery of the postal items, an express mail service is characterised by the provision of supplementary services, such as guarantee of delivery by a given date, delivery to the addressee in person or tracking and tracing of postal items throughout the distribution process.
Uz brži i pouzdaniji prijam, prijevoz i isporuku poštanskih pošiljaka, uslugu hitne pošte karakterizira pružanje dodatnih usluga, kao što su zajamčeno uručivanje do određenog datuma, osobno uručivanje primatelju ili slijeđenje i praćenje poštanskih pošiljaka tijekom čitavog postupka distribucije.
The definition proposed by the applicant is in line with the Commission precedents.
Definicija koju je predložio podnositelj zahtjeva u skladu je s prethodnim odlukama Komisije.
For the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the relevant product market is defined as distribution of courier items.
Za potrebe ove Odluke i ne dovodeći u pitanje pravo tržišnog natjecanja relevantno je tržište proizvoda definirano kao distribucija kurirskih pošiljaka.
As regards the geographical market, in its previous decisions, the Commission took the view that the markets for postal services, which could include narrower markets (e.g. letter mail services; small package delivery services) appeared to be national in scope [10].
Kad je riječ o geografskom tržištu, Komisija je u svojim prethodnim odlukama zauzela stajalište da su tržišta poštanskih usluga, koja mogu uključivati uža tržišta (npr. usluge slanja pisama, usluge dostave malih paketa), očito nacionalna tržišta [10].
Furthermore, the Commission also considered that for example the market for the international delivery of small packages had a national dimension [11].
Nadalje, Komisija je isto tako smatrala da npr. tržište međunarodne dostave malih paketa ima nacionalnu dimenziju [11].
The applicant's proposed definition is in line with the Commission precedents.
Definicija koju je predložio podnositelj zahtjeva u skladu je s prethodnim odlukama Komisije.
Given that there are no reasons to assume a wider or a narrower scope of the market, for the purposes of this Decision, and without prejudice to competition law the geographical market for courier services is national in scope.
S obzirom na to da pretpostavka šireg ili užeg opsega tržišta nije utemeljena, za potrebe ove Odluke i ne dovodeći u pitanje pravo u području tržišnog natjecanja, geografsko je tržište kurirskih usluga nacionalno tržište.
Regarding the assessment whether the activity is directly exposed to competition, based on the information provided by the applicant and also when looking at the last report of the postal markets in Poland [12], it can be established that there are several operators active in the market for express and courier services, including subsidiaries of all large integrators (i.e. UPS; DHL; FedEx), subsidiaries of national postal operators active in this segment of the postal market (e.g. DPD; GLS) and national providers (e.g. InPost; K-EX).According to available information [13], market share of Poczta Polska in this segment of the market was almost 12 % in terms of volume and 9 % in terms of turnover in 2014, compared to almost 3 % in terms of volume and 5 % in terms of turnover in 2013.
Kad je riječ o ocjeni je li djelatnost izravno izložena natjecanju na tržištima, na temelju podataka koje je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva i uvidom u posljednje izvješće poštanskih tržišta u Poljskoj [12] može se utvrditi da je na tržištu hitnih i kurirskih usluga aktivno nekoliko operatera, uključujući društva kćeri svih velikih integratora (tj. UPS, DHL i FedEx), društva kćeri nacionalnih poštanskih operatera aktivnih u tom segmentu poštanskog tržišta (npr. DPD i GLS) i nacionalne pružatelje usluga (npr. InPost i K-EX).Prema dostupnim informacijama [13] tržišni udio poduzeća Poczta Polska u tom je segmentu 2014. bio gotovo 12 % u pogledu količine i 9 % u pogledu prometa, u usporedbi s gotovo 3 % u pogledu količine i 5 % u pogledu prometa ostvarenih 2013.
The market shares of the competitors of Poczta Polska S.A. appear to be higher or comparable to those of Poczta Polska S.A.. The market shares of the biggest competitors in terms of turnover are respectively: […] [… %] in 2013 and […] in 2014; […] [… %] in 2013 and [… %] in 2014; […] [… %] in 2013 and [… %] in 2014; […] [… %] in 2013, [… %] in 2014; […] [… %] in 2013 and [… %] in 2014 [14].
Tržišni udjeli konkurenata poduzeća Poczta Polska S.A. čine se višima ili usporedivima onima koje drži Poczta Polska S.A. Tržišni udjeli najvećih konkurenata u pogledu prometa su: […] [… %] 2013. i […] 2014.; […] [… %] 2013. i [… %] 2014.; […] [… %] 2013. i [… %] 2014.; […] [… %] 2013., [… %] 2014.; […] [… %] 2013. i [… %] 2014. [14]
For the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the factors listed in recitals 15 to 18 should be taken as an indication of exposure to competition, of this activity in Poland.
Za potrebe ove Odluke i ne dovodeći u pitanje pravo u području tržišnog natjecanja, čimbenike navedene u uvodnim izjavama od 15. do 18. treba shvatiti kao pokazatelje izloženosti ove aktivnosti tržišnom natjecanju u Poljskoj.
Consequently, since the conditions set out in Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU are met, it should be established that Directive 2014/25/EU does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of this activity in Poland.
Slijedom toga, budući da su uvjeti utvrđeni člankom 34. Direktive 2014/25/EU ispunjeni, treba utvrditi da se Direktiva 2014/25/EU ne primjenjuje na ugovore kojima je namjena omogućivanje obavljanja te djelatnosti u Poljskoj.
Unaddressed mail services
Usluge rukovanja neadresiranom poštom
Unaddressed advertising mail is characterised by the absence of particular destination address identifying the final addressee individually.
Obilježje je neadresirane promidžbene pošte izostanak posebne odredišne adrese kojom se pojedinačno označuje konačni primatelj.
It is unsolicited advertising mail, which fulfils certain criteria such as: uniform weight, format, contents and layout for distribution to a group of recipients.
Riječ je o nezatraženoj promidžbenoj pošti koja ispunjava određene kriterije kao što su: jedinstvena težina, format, sadržaj i izgled za distribuciju skupini primatelja.
The Commission has held in previous decisions that the market for the mail delivery services can be segmented in addressed mail markets and unaddressed mail markets [15].
Komisija je u prethodnim odlukama smatrala da se tržište usluga dostave pošte može segmentirati na tržišta adresirane pošte i tržišta neadresirane pošte [15].