natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, Cevital clearly and publicly [43] indicated that it intended to incorporate FagorBrandt's assets into its own commercial strategy, as electrical household appliances already account for 10 % of the Cevital group's turnover.
Osim toga, grupa Cevital jasno je i javno [43] izjavila da namjerava imovinu društva FagorBrandt integrirati u vlastitu poslovnu strategiju, pri čemu se 10 % prihoda grupe Cevital već odnosilo na sektor električnih kućanskih uređaja.
Finally, and revealingly, Groupe Brandt inherited the right to use the company's trademarks that are most well-known in France, namely Brandt, De Dietrich, Vedette, Sauter and Easycook,
Naposljetku, društvo Groupe Brandt vrlo je očito preuzelo prava uporabe najpoznatijih marki društva u Francuskoj, odnosno Brandt, De Dietrich, Vedette, Sauter i Easycook.
Consequently, in the light of the scale of the assets transferred, the price at which the assets were transferred and the economic justification for the takeover, the Commission concludes that there is economic continuity between FagorBrandt and Groupe Brandt.
Prema tome, s obzirom na opseg prenesene imovine, cijenu po kojoj je ta imovina prenesena i gospodarsko obrazloženje preuzimanja, Komisija je zaključila da između društava FagorBrandt i Groupe Brandt postoji gospodarski kontinuitet.
Generally, the repayment of aid is intended to eliminate the distortion of competition brought about by a certain competitive advantage (in this case, the aid element contained in the FDES loan of EUR 10 million) and thus to re-establish the status quo before the aid was granted [44].
Općenito, povratom potpore želi se otkloniti narušavanje tržišnog natjecanja uzrokovano utvrđenom konkurentskom prednošću (u ovom slučaju, element potpore koji sadržava zajam FDES-a od 10 milijuna EUR) i ponovno uspostaviti situaciju koja je prethodila isplati potpore [44].
Consequently, it is no longer necessary to pursue Groupe Brandt for the recovery of the incompatible State aid which was granted to FagorBrandt.
Prema tome, više nema potrebe od društva Groupe Brandt tražiti povrat nespojive državne potpore koju je primilo društvo FagorBrandt.
Recovery of the incompatible aid from Groupe Brandt
Povrat nespojive potpore od društva Groupe Brandt
As regards the FDES loan of EUR 47,5 million granted to Groupe Brandt, only Groupe Brandt is liable for the improperly received aid.
U pogledu zajma FDES-a od 47,5 milijuna EUR koji je dodijeljen društvu Groupe Brandt, samo je to društvo dužno vratiti nepropisno stečene potpore.
The loan was granted specifically to Groupe Brandt by name, and the company is still operating as of the date on which this Decision is adopted.
Naime, zajam je osobito dodijeljen društvu Groupe Brandt koje je na dan donošenja ove Odluke i dalje aktivno.
The question of economic continuity between Cevital and Exagon on the one hand and Groupe Brandt on the other is therefore not relevant.
Stoga nije upitan gospodarski kontinuitet između grupe Cevital i, s jedne strane, društva Exagon, te s druge strane, društva Groupe Brandt.
Moreover, given that the aid measures were granted in the form of loans, the Commission considers that the aid materialised and continues in principle to materialise at the time of payment of each repayment instalment.
Osim toga, budući da su mjere potpore dodijeljene u obliku zajma, Komisija smatra da se potpora materijalizirala i da se u načelu nastavila materijalizirati u trenutku isplate svake tranše povrata.
Moreover, as regards all future due dates from 1 March 2016, the interest rate of the FDES loan was increased and set at 7,03 %.
Osim toga, u pogledu svih budućih dospijeća od 1. ožujka 2016. kamatna je stopa zajma FDES-a povećana i utvrđena na 7,03 %.
This was proven by an amendment to the loan agreement, sent to the Commission by France on 1 March 2016.
To je dokazano izmjenom ugovora o zajmu, koju je Francuska proslijedila Komisiji 1. ožujka 2016.
In the light of the above, the Commission considers that the aid element contained in the FDES loan of EUR 47,5 million has been eliminated and the status quo before the incompatible aid was granted has been re-established, in accordance with the relevant case-law [45].
U pogledu tih elemenata, Komisija smatra da je otklonjen element potpore koji je sadržavao zajam FDES-a od 47,5 milijuna EUR te da je ponovno uspostavljena situacija koja je prevladavala prije dodjele nespojive potpore, u skladu sa sudskom praksom u tom području [45].
In addition, no aid will materialise in the future.
Osim toga, u budućnosti se neće materijalizirati nijedna potpora.
Consequently, it is not necessary to pursue Groupe Brandt for the recovery of incompatible aid.
Prema tome, više nema potrebe od društva Groupe Brandt tražiti povrat nespojive potpore.
The Commission finds that, by granting FDES loans to FagorBrandt and Groupe Brandt, France has unlawfully implemented State aid in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Komisija utvrđuje da je Francuska dodjelom zajmova FDES-a društvima FagorBrandt i Groupe Brandt nezakonito provela državne potpore i time prekršila članak 108. stavak 3.
However, the repayment of the loans and the adjustment of the loan agreement to market conditions has re-established the status quo before this unlawful State aid was granted, to the extent that it is no longer necessary to order recovery and the abolition of the measures in question,
UFEU-a. Međutim, povratom zajmova i prilagodbom ugovora o zajmu tržišnim uvjetima ponovno je uspostavljena situacija koja je prevladavala prije dodjele tih nezakonitih državnih potpora, tako da više nije potrebno naložiti povrat i ukidanje predmetnih mjera,
The State aid resulting from the loans from the Economic and Social Development Fund (FDES) granted to FagorBrandt on 28 November 2013, in so far as the interest rate applied is below the rate calculated in this Decision on the basis of the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (‘the 2008 Communication’), i.e. 7,03 %, unlawfully granted by France to FagorBrandt, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is incompatible with the internal market.
Državne potpore koja su proizašle iz zajmova Fonda za gospodarski i socijalni razvoj (FDES) koji su 28. studenoga 2013. dodijeljeni društvu FagorBrandt, s obzirom na to da je primijenjena kamatna stopa niža od stope izračunane u ovoj Odluci na temelju Komunikacije Komisije o reviziji metode za utvrđivanje referentnih i diskontnih stopa (dalje u tekstu: „Komunikacija iz 2008.”), odnosno od 7,03 %, te koje je Francuska nezakonito dodijelila u korist društva FagorBrandt i time prekršila članak 108. stavak 3. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, nespojive su s unutarnjim tržištem.
The State aid resulting from the FDES loan granted to Groupe Brandt on 24 April 2014, in so far as the interest rates applied are below the rate calculated in this Decision on the basis of the 2008 Communication, i.e. 7,03 %, unlawfully granted by France to Groupe Brandt, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is incompatible with the internal market.
Državne potpore koje su proizašle iz zajma FDES-a koji je 24. travnja 2014. dodijeljen društvu Groupe Brandt, s obzirom na to da su primijenjene kamatne stope niže od stope izračunane u ovoj Odluci na temelju Komunikacije iz 2008., odnosno od 7,03 %, te koje je Francuska nezakonito dodijelila u korist društva Groupe Brandt i time prekršila članak 108. stavak 3. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, nespojive su s unutarnjim tržištem.
In consequence of its having been found that Groupe Brandt has repaid the aid referred to in Article 1, the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has become devoid of purpose.
Nakon što je utvrđeno da je društvo Groupe Brandt vratilo potpore iz članka 1., formalni istražni postupak iz članka 108. stavka 2. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije postao je bespredmetan.
OJ C 460, 19.12.2014, p. 66.
SL C 460, 19.12.2014., str. 66.
Société Générale, Natixis, CACIB, Arkea and BBVA.
Société Générale, Natixis, CACIB, Arkea i BBVA.
Claims arising in a proper manner after the issue of the commencement order for the needs of the proceedings or the observation period or as consideration for a service provided to the debtor during this period, shall be paid as they fall due.II.
Potraživanja koja uredno nastaju uslijed donošenja presude o pokretanju postupka za potrebe provedbe postupka ili razdoblja promatranja ili u zamjenu za uslugu pruženu dužniku tijekom tog razdoblja, plaćaju se po njihovu dospijeću.II.
Where they are not paid as they fall due, these claims will be paid in priority before all the other claims, whether these are secured or not by privileges or guarantees, except for those claims secured by the privilege provided for in Articles L. 143-10, L. 143-11, L. 742-6 and L. 751-15 of the Labour Code, legal fees arising in a proper manner after the issue of the commencement order for the needs of the proceedings and those claims secured by the privilege created by Article L. 611-11 of this Code.…’.
Ako se ne plate po dospijeću, ta se potraživanja prema pravu prvenstva plaćaju prije svih drugih potraživanja, s pravom prvenstva ili instrumentima osiguranja ili bez njih, ne uključujući potraživanja osigurana pravom prvenstva utvrđenim u člancima L. 3253-2, L. 3253-4 i L. 7313-8 Zakona o radu, pravosudne troškove uredno nastale uslijed donošenja presude o pokretanju postupka za potrebe provedbe tog postupka i potraživanja osigurana pravom prvenstva utvrđenim u članku L. 611-11 ovog Zakona. […]”
A seasonal credit is a short-term professional credit to meet the needs of a periodic activity, and therefore of the seasonal nature of purchases and manufacturing, or sales.
Sezonski je kredit kratkoročni, poslovni kredit kojim se odgovara na potrebe proizašle iz periodične djelatnosti pa tako i iz sezonske naravi kupnje i proizvodnje ili prodaje poduzetnika.
Initially called Electrom SAS.
Prvotni naziv društva bio je Electrom SAS.
EUR […] million in the form of a capital injection and EUR […] million in a blocked current account, payment of which was conditional on the obtainment of the bank financing and the participation of the FDES.
[…] milijuna EUR u obliku dokapitalizacije i […] milijuna EUR na blokiranom tekućem računu čije je plaćanje uvjetovano dobivanjem bankovnih financiranja i sudjelovanjem FDES-a.
Commission Decision 2013/283/EU of 25 July 2012 on state aid that France plans to grant to FagorBrandt (SA.23839 (C 44/2007)) (OJ L 166, 18.6.2013, p. 1).
Odluka Komisije 2013/283/EU od 25. srpnja 2012. o državnoj potpori koju Francuska planira dodijeliti društvu FagorBrandt (SA.23839 (C 44/2007) (SL L 166, 18.6.2013., str. 1.).
Judgments of the Court of Justice of 4 April 1995, Commission v Italy, C-348/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:95, paragraphs 24, 26 and 27, of 4 April 1995, Commission v Italy, C-350/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:96, paragraphs 19, 21 and 22, and of 29 April 2004, Germany v Commission, C-277/00, ECLI:EU:C:2004:238, paragraphs 74, 75 and 76.
Presude Suda od 4. travnja 1995., Komisija/Italija, C-348/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:95, točke 24., 26. i 27., od 4. travnja 1995., Komisija/Italija, C-350/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:96, točke 19., 21. i 22., i od 29. travnja 2004., Njemačka/Komisija, C-277/00, ECLI:EU:C:2004:238, točke 74., 75. i 76.
Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012, Ryanair v Commission, T-123/09, ECLI:EU:T:2012:164, paragraph 155.
Presuda Općeg suda od 28. ožujka 2012., Ryanair protiv Komisije, T-123/09, ECLI:EU:T:2012:164, točka 155.
See Commission Decision of 17 September 2008, State Aid N 321/08, N 322/08 and N 323/08 — Greece — Sale of certain assets of Olympic Airlines/Olympic Airways Services (OJ C 18, 23.1.2010, p. 9).
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 17. rujna 2008., Državna potpora br. N 321/08, N 322/08 i N 323/08 – Grčka – Prodaja određene imovine društva Olympic Airlines/Olympic Airways Services (SL C 18, 23.1.2010., str. 9.).
See judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2000, Alitalia v Commission, T-296/97, ECLI:EU:T:2000:289, paragraph 81.
Vidjeti presudu Općeg suda od 12. prosinca 2000., Alitalia protiv Komisije, T-296/97, ECLI:EU:T:2000:289, točka 81.
Official Journal of the French Republic, 1.12.2004.
Službeni list Francuske Republike (JORF) od 1.12.2004.
http://www.lefigaro.fr/societes/2013/12/19/20005-20131219ARTFIG00567-arnaud-montebourg-au-chevet-de-fagorbrandt.php: Le Figaro, 19.12.2013, ‘Arnaud Montebourg comes to FagorBrandt's rescue’.
http://www.lefigaro.fr/societes/2013/12/19/20005-20131219ARTFIG00567-arnaud-montebourg-au-chevet-de-fagorbrandt.php: Novine Le Figaro, 19.12.2013., „Arnaud Montebourg au chevet de FagorBrandt” ( „Arnaud Montebourg priskače u pomoć društvu FagorBrandt”).
http://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5N0IQ3HR20131105: Reuters, 5.11.2013, ‘Fagor has a future in France, says Montebourg’.
http://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5N0IQ3HR20131105: Novine Reuters, 5.11.2013., „Fagor a un avenir en France, dit Montebourg” ( „Fagor ima budućnost u Francuskoj, tvrdi Montebourg”).
http://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5N0IR2AJ20131106: Reuters, 6.11.2013, ‘FagorBrandt — Government aims to save as many jobs as it can’.
http://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5N0IR2AJ20131106: Novine Reuters, 6.11.2013., „FagorBrandt – Le gouvernement veut sauver un maximum d'emplois” ( „FagorBrandt – Vlada želi spasiti što više radnih mjesta”).
Tranche B was repaid at the end of April 2014 instead of at the end of March.
Tranša B vraćena je krajem travnja 2014. umjesto krajem ožujka.
The late payment penalties stipulated in the contract with the FDES were paid accordingly.
Kazne za kašnjenje predviđene ugovorom sklopljenim s FDES-om plaćene su u skladu s ugovornim odredbama.
Economic advantage = 0,0703 × 10000000 – [0,05-0,10] × 10000000.
Gospodarska prednost = 0,0703 × 10000000 – [0,05 – 0,10] × 10000000.
Société Générale and Natixis are leading bankers to the former FagorBrandt group: these two banks each hold EUR 3 million in unsecured debt, which became so after the pledge on stocks was lifted in FagorBrandt's observation period.
Société Générale i Natixis banke su prvog reda prethodnog društva FagorBrandt: svaka od te dvije banke ima 3 milijuna EUR neosiguranih potraživanja, koja su postala nezaštićena nakon ukidanja založnog prava na zalihama za vrijeme promatranja društva FagorBrandt.
Economic advantage = (0,0703 × 11200000 – [0,00-0,05] × 11200000) + (0,0703 × 23800000 – [0,00-0,05] × 23800000) + (0,0703 × 12500000 – [0,00-0,05] × 12500000).
Gospodarska prednost = (0,0703 × 11200000 – [0,00 – 0,05] × 11200000) + (0,0703 × 23800000 – [0,00 – 0,05] × 23800000) + (0,0703 × 12500000 – [0,00 – 0,05] × 12500000).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 July 1973, Commission v Germany, C-70/72, ECLI:EU:C:1973:87, paragraph 13.
Vidjeti presudu Suda od 12. srpnja 1973., Komisija protiv Njemačke, C-70/72, ECLI:EU:C:1973:87, točku 13.
Judgment of 14 September 1994, Spain v Commission, C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:325, paragraph 75.
Vidjeti presudu od 14. rujna 1994., Španjolska protiv Komisije, C-278/92, C-279/92 i C-280/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:325, točku 75.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 June 1999, Belgium v Commission, C-75/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:311, paragraphs 64 and 65.
Vidjeti presudu Suda od 17. lipnja 1999., Belgija protiv Komisije, C-75/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:311, točke 64. i 65.
Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2002, Keller and Keller Meccanica v Commission, T-35/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:19, paragraphs 106 to 109.
Presuda Općeg suda od 30. siječnja 2002., Keller i Keller Meccanica protiv Komisije, T-35/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:19, točke od 106. do 109.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 May 2003, Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission, C-328/99 and C-399/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:252.
Presuda Suda od 8. svibnja 2003., Italija i SIM 2 Multimedia SpA protiv Komisije, C-328/99 i C-399/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:252.
Commission Decision of 17 September 2008, State Aid N 321/08, N 322/08 and N 323/08 — Greece — Sale of certain assets of Olympic Airlines/Olympic Airways Services; Commission Decision of 12 November 2008, State Aid N 510/08 — Italy — Sale of assets of Alitalia; Commission Decision of 4 April 2012, SA.34547 — France — Takeover of SERNAM Group assets under the court-supervised administration procedure.
Odluka Komisije od 17. rujna 2008., Državne potpore N 321/08, N 322/08 i N 323/08 – Grčka – Prodaja određene imovine društva Olympic Airlines protiv Olympic Airways Services; Odluka Komisije od 12. studenoga 2008., Državne potpore N 510/08 – Italija – Prodaja imovine društva Alitalia; Odluka Komisije od 4. travnja 2012., SA.34547 – Francuska – Preuzimanje imovine grupe SERNAM u okviru predstečajnog postupka.
Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012, Ryanair Ltd v Commission, T-565/09, ECLI:EU:T:2012:164.
Presuda Općeg suda od 28. ožujka 2012., Ryanair Ltd protiv Komisije, T-123/09, Zb., ECLI:EU:T:2012:164.
With the exception of those linked to the La Roche-sur-Yon site.
Ne uključujući zalihe iz postrojenja u La Roche-sur-Yonu.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 September 2009, Commission v MTU Friedrichshafen, C-520/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:557, paragraph 57 and case-law cited, namely judgments Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission C-328/99 and C-399/00 ECLI:EU:C:2003:252, paragraph 66 and Germany v Commission C-277/00 ECLI:EU:C:2004:238, paragraphs 74 to 76.
Presuda Suda od 11. rujna 2009., Komisija protiv MTU Friedrichshafen, C-520/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:557, točka 57. i navedena sudska praksa, odnosno presude Italija i SIM 2 Multimedia protiv Komisije, C-328/99 i C-399/00 ECLI:EU:C:2003:252, točka 66. i Njemačka protiv Komisije, C-277/00 ECLI:EU:C:2004:238, točke od 74. do 76.
An additional request for information was sent on 4 April 2014, to which France replied by letters dated 15 and 28 April and 13 May.
Novi zahtjev za informacije poslan je 4. travnja 2014. na koji je Francuska odgovorila dopisima od 15. i 28. travnja te 13. svibnja 2014.
That request was followed by the request dated 27 June 2014, to which France replied on 10 July.
Taj je zahtjev dopunjen zahtjevom od 27. lipnja 2014. na koji je Francuska odgovorila 10. srpnja 2014.
After the opening of the court-supervised administration procedure, the official receiver found that the cash-flow forecasts, which had been reviewed by the consultancy Ernst&Young Advisory on 12 November 2013, showed that the company in question would be faced with a cash-flow shortfall of some EUR […] [3] million as early as January 2014 despite an order book of approximately EUR [50-100] million. The restart of part of FagorBrandt's activities would have generated positive cash flows, thereby financing the continuation of activities until at least March 2014, and resulting in the postponement of the deadline for submission of takeover bids.
Nakon pokretanja predstečajnog postupka predstečajni upravitelj utvrdio je da predviđanja novčanih tokova, koja je 12. studenoga 2013. provjerio ured Ernst&Young Advisory, ukazuju na to da će se predmetno društvo od siječnja 2014. suočiti s manjkom novčanog toka od oko […] [3] milijuna EUR, unatoč knjizi narudžbi od oko [50 – 100] milijuna EUR. Ponovna uspostava dijela djelatnosti društva FagorBrandt omogućila je stvaranje pozitivnog novčanog toka, a tako i financiranje nastavka djelatnosti do ožujka 2014., što je dovelo do odgode konačnog datuma za podnošenje ponuda za preuzimanje.
From 12 November 2013, the official receiver approached the banks Thémis and […], which are specialised in the financing of undertakings in court-supervised administration, with a view to obtaining loans of EUR 10 million. On 17 November 2013 Thémis agreed to grant a loan of EUR 5 million to FagorBrandt, on condition that another bank, […], committed itself on the same terms and that France granted a loan of the same amount to FagorBrandt.
Predstečajni se upravitelj od 12. studenoga 2013. obratio bankama Thémis i […], koje su specijalizirane za financiranje poduzetnika u predstečajnom postupku, u svrhu dobivanja zajmova u iznosu od 10 milijuna EUR. Banka Thémis pristala je 17. studenoga 2013. dodijeliti društvu FagorBrandt zajam od 5 milijuna EUR, pod uvjetom da banka […] pristane na iste uvjete i da Francuska društvu FagorBrandt dodijeli zajam istog iznosa.
At the same time, by judgment of Nanterre Commercial Court of 21 November 2013, FagorBrandt obtained the restructuring of a financing of EUR [20-50] million with a banking pool [4]. It was also authorised to pay to the creditors holding a pledge on the stocks of finished products an amount corresponding to 50 % of the value of goods as and when they were released and to borrow up to EUR 15 million, with the provision of collateral and the benefit of the privilege laid down by Article L.622-17 of the French Commercial Code [5].
Istodobno, presudom Trgovačkog suda u Nanterreu od 21. studenoga 2013. društvo FagorBrandt od bankovnog je konzorcija [4] dobilo restrukturiranje financiranja od [20–50] milijuna EUR. Bilo je ovlašteno i vjerovnicima sa založnim pravom na zalihama gotovih proizvoda isplaćivati iznos u visini od 50 % vrijednosti robe u trenutku njezina stavljanja na tržište i posuđivati do najviše 15 milijuna EUR, uz dodjelu instrumenata osiguranja i prava prvenstva iz članka L. 622-17 Trgovačkog zakonika [5].
The Cevital group employs more than 13000 staff and had a consolidated turnover of EUR 2,4 billion in 2013. Its proposed takeover involved the acquisition of FagorBrandt's assets through Exagon, a subsidiary of the Cevital group, by setting up a new company, Groupe Brandt.
Grupa Cevital imala je 2013. više od 13000 zaposlenika te je ostvarila konsolidirani prihod od 2,4 milijarde EUR. Njezin plan preuzimanja odnosio se na stjecanje imovine društva FagorBrandt posredstvom društva Exagon, društva kćeri grupe Cevital, osnivanjem novog društva, Groupe Brandt.
France granted a loan of EUR 10 million to FagorBrandt through the FDES. The loan was formally granted by an Order of 28 November 2013 of the Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs.
Francuska je posredstvom FDES-a društvu FagorBrandt dodijelila zajam od 10 milijuna EUR. Dodjela tog zajma postala je službena odlukom ministra gospodarstva i financija od 28. studenoga 2013.
France agreed to the postponement of the due date of this payment by one month, until 30 April 2014.
Francuska je pristala na odgodu naplate tog dospijeća za mjesec dana, odnosno do 30. travnja 2014.
France has confirmed that the balance on the loan, i.e. EUR 3,5 million, had been repaid on 25 April 2014.
Francuska je potvrdila da je preostali dio zajma, odnosno 3,5 milijuna EUR, vraćen 25. travnja 2014.
France granted a loan of EUR 47,5 million to Groupe Brandt through the FDES. The loan was formally granted by an Order of 10 April 2014 of the Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs, and signed on 24 April 2014.
Francuska je posredstvom FDES-a društvu Groupe Brandt dodijelila zajam od 47,5 milijuna EUR. Dodjela tog zajma postala je službena odlukom ministra gospodarstva i financija od 10. travnja 2014. koja je potpisana 24. travnja 2014.
The loan was to be used to manage cash flow needs and financing of the assets taken over.
Taj je zajam trebalo upotrijebiti za zadovoljavanje potreba novčanog toka i financiranje preuzete imovine.
Tranches B and C of the loan, totalling EUR 36,3 million, were paid on 28 April 2014.
Tranše B i C zajma, ukupnog iznosa od 36,3 milijuna EUR, plaćene su 28. travnja 2014.
Tranche A, of EUR 11,2 million, was paid on 4 July 2014.
Tranša A od 11,2 milijuna EUR plaćena je 4. srpnja 2014.
Natixis and Société Générale each granted a loan of EUR [5-10] million. These two loans each comprised two tranches: tranche A of EUR [1-5] million and tranche B of EUR [3-6] million. The terms of this financing are identical to those applied to tranches A and B of the FDES loan.
Banke Natixis i Société Générale dodijelile su svaka zajam od [5–10] milijuna EUR. Svaki se od tih zajmova sastoji od dvije tranše: tranše A od [1–5] milijuna EUR i tranše B od [3 – 6] milijuna EUR. Uvjeti tog financiranja jednaki su onima primijenjenima na tranše A i B zajma FDES-a.