natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, the FTC, along with enforcement partners in the European Union and around the globe, last year launched an alert system within the Global Privacy Enforcement Network (‘GPEN’) to share information about investigations and promote enforcement coordination.
FTC je posebno, zajedno s partnerima u izvršenju u Europskoj uniji i cijelom svijetu, prošle godine pokrenuo sustav upozoravanja u okviru Globalne mreže za zaštitu privatnosti (dalje u tekstu „GPEN”) radi razmjene informacija o istragama i promicanja koordinacije izvršenja.
This GPEN Alert tool could be particularly useful in the context of the Privacy Shield Framework.
Taj alat za upozoravanje GPEN-a posebno bi mogao biti koristan u kontekstu okvira sustava za zaštitu privatnosti.
The FTC and EU DPAs could use it to coordinate with respect to the Framework and other privacy investigations, including as a starting point for sharing information in order to deliver coordinated and more effective privacy protection for consumers.
FTC i nadležna tijela EU-a za zaštitu privatnosti mogla bi ga upotrebljavati za koordinaciju u pogledu Okvira i drugih istraga privatnosti, među ostalim kao početnu točku za razmjenu informacija u cilju pružanja koordinirane i učinkovitije zaštite privatnosti potrošača.
We look forward to continuing to work with participating EU authorities to deploy the GPEN Alert system more broadly and develop other tools to improve enforcement cooperation in privacy cases, including those involving the Framework.
Veselimo se daljnjoj suradnji s uključenim nadležnim tijelima EU-a u široj primjeni sustava upozoravanja GPEN-a i razvoju drugih alata za poboljšanje suradnje u izvršenju u predmetima povezanima s privatnošću, među ostalima onima koji se odnose na Okvir.
The FTC is pleased to affirm its commitment to enforcing the new Privacy Shield Framework.
FTC sa zadovoljstvom potvrđuje svoju opredijeljenost za provedbu novog Okvira sustava za zaštitu privatnosti.
We also look forward to continuing engagement with our EU colleagues as we work together to protect consumer privacy on both sides of the Atlantic.
Veselimo se i daljnjoj suradnji sa svojim kolegama iz EU-a na zaštiti privatnosti potrošača s obje strane Atlantika.
Chairwoman
Predsjednica
We provide additional information about U.S. federal and state privacy laws in Attachment A. In addition, a summary of our recent privacy and security enforcement actions is available on the FTC's website at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy-data-security-update-2015.
Dodatne informacije o saveznim i državnim zakonima SAD-a o privatnosti navodimo u Prilogu A i sažetak nedavnih mjera za osiguranje privatnosti i sigurnosti na stranici: https://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy-data-security-update-2015.
See FTC Policy Statement on Deception, appended to Cliffdale Assocs., Inc., 103 F.T.C.
Vidjeti Izjava politike FTC-a o prijevari, priložena Cliffdale Assocs., Inc., 103 F.T.C.
110, 174 (1984), available at https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1983/10/ftc-policy-statement-deception.
110, 174 (1984), https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1983/10/ftc-policy-statement-deception.
See 15 U.S.C § 45(n); FTC Policy Statement on Unfairness, appended to Int'l Harvester Co., 104 F.T.C.
Vidjeti 15 U.S.C. članak 45. točka (n); Izjava politike FTC-a o nepoštenju, priložena Int'l Harvester Co., 104. F.T.C.
949, 1070 (1984), available at https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1980/12/ftc-policy-statement-unfairness.
949, 1070 (1984), https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1980/12/ftc-policy-statement-unfairness.
See California Dental Ass'n v. FTC, 526 U.S.
Vidjeti California Dental Ass'n protiv FTC-a, 526 U.S.
See FTC v. Accusearch, Inc., No 06CV015D (D. Wyo. Dec. 20, 2007), aff'd 570 F.3d 1187 (10th Cir. 2009).
Vidjeti FTC protiv Accusearcha, Inc., br. 06CV015D (D. Wyo. 20. prosinca 2007.), aff'd 570 F.3d 1187 (10. Cir. 2009.).
See In the Matter of True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc., No. C-4512 (F.T.C. Mar. 12, 2015) (decision and order), available at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/150318trust-edo.pdf.
Vidjeti In the Matter of True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc., br. C-4512 (F.T.C. 12. ožujka 2015.) (odluka i nalog), dostupno na https://www ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/150318trust-edo.pdf.
See In the Matter of Google, Inc., No. C-4336 (F.T.C. Oct. 13 2011) (decision and order), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/03/ftc-charges-deceptive-privacy-practices-googles-rollout-its-buzz; In the Matter of Facebook, Inc., No. C-4365 (F.T.C. July 27, 2012) (decision and order), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2012/08/ftc-approves-final-settlement-facebook; In the Matter of Myspace LLC, No. C-4369 (F.T.C. Aug. 30, 2012) (decision and order), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2012/09/ftc-finalizes-privacy-settlement-myspace.
Vidjeti U predmetu u vezi s Googleom, Inc., br. C-4336 (F.T.C. 13. listopada 2011.) (odluka i nalog), dostupno na https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/03/ftc-charges-deceptive-privacy-practices-googles-rollout-its-buzz; U predmetu u vezi s Google, Inc., br. C-4365 (F.T.C. 27. srpnja 2012.) (odluka i nalog), dostupno na https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2012/08/ftc-approves-final-settlement-facebook; U predmetu Myspace LLC, br. C-4369 (F.T.C. 30. kolovoza 2012.) (odluka i nalog), dostupno na https://www.ftc.gov/news- events/press-releases/2012/09/ftc-finalizes-privacy-settlement-myspace.
See FTC v. Karnani, No 2:09-cv-05276 (C.D. Cal. May 20, 2011) (stipulated final order), available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2011/06/110609karnanistip.pdf; see also Lesley Fair, FTC Business Center Blog, Around the World in Shady Ways, https://www.ftc.gov/blog/2011/06/around-world-shady-ways (June 9, 2011).
Vidjeti FTC protiv Karnanija, br. 2:09-cv-05276 (C.D. Cal. 20. svibnja 2011.) (propisani konačni nalog), dostupno na https://www ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2011/06/110609karnanistip.pdf; vidjeti isto Lesley Fair, FTC Business Center Blog, Around the World in Shady Ways, https://www.ftc.gov/blog/2011/06/around-world-shady-ways (9. lipnja 2011.).
Letter from Ken Hyatt, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade, International Trade Administration, to Věra Jourová, Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality.
Dopis Kena Hyatta, zamjenika Ministarstva trgovine za međunarodnu trgovinu Věri Jourovoj, povjerenici za pravosuđe, zaštitu potrošača i ravnopravnost spolova.
In determining whether to exercise its U.S. SAFE WEB Act authority, the FTC considers, inter alia: ‘(A) whether the requesting agency has agreed to provide or will provide reciprocal assistance to the Commission; (B) whether compliance with the request would prejudice the public interest of the United States; and (C) whether the requesting agency's investigation or enforcement proceeding concerns acts or practices that cause or are likely to cause injury to a significant number of persons.’ 15 U.S.C.
Kada utvrđuje treba li izvršavati svoje ovlasti u skladu s američkim Zakonom o sigurnom internetu, FTC razmatra, među ostalim, sljedeće: „(A) je li se agencija koja podnosi zahtjev složila pružati ili će pružati uzajamnu pomoć Komisiji; (B) hoće li se postupanjem u skladu sa zahtjevom dovesti u pitanje javni interes Sjedinjenih Američkih država; i (C) odnosi li se istraga agencije koja podnosi zahtjev ili provodi ovršni postupak na postupke ili praksu kojima se uzrokuje, ili bi se mogla uzrokovati šteta velikom broju osoba.” 15 U.S.C. članak 46. točka (j) podtočka 3.
Although the FTC does not resolve or mediate individual consumer complaints, the FTC affirms that it will prioritize Privacy Shield referrals from EU DPAs.
Iako FTC ne rješava pojedinačne pritužbe potrošača niti u njima posreduje, on potvrđuje da će davati prednost predmetima upućenima od nadležnih tijela za zaštitu podataka iz EU-a u vezi sa sustavom zaštite privatnosti.
In addition, the FTC uses complaints in its Consumer Sentinel database, which is accessible by many other law enforcement agencies, to identify trends, determine enforcement priorities, and identify potential investigative targets.
Nadalje, FTC upotrebljava pritužbe u svojoj bazi potrošača Sentinel, kojoj mogu pristupiti mnoge druge agencije za provedbu zakona, za utvrđivanje trendova, prioriteta za izvršenje i za utvrđivanje mogućih predmeta istrage.
EU individuals can use the same complaint system available to U.S. citizens to submit a complaint to the FTC at www.ftc.gov/complaint.
Građani EU-a mogu upotrijebiti isti sustav pritužbi koji je dostupan građanima SAD-a za podnošenje pritužbe FTC-u www ftc.gov/complaint.
For individual Privacy Shield complaints, however, it may be most useful for EU individuals to submit complaints to their Member State DPA or alternative dispute resolution provider.
Međutim, za pojedinačne pritužbe u okviru sustava za zaštitu privatnosti, pojedinicima iz EU-a može biti najkorisnije podnijeti pritužbe nadležnom tijelu za zaštitu privatnosti njihove države članice ili alternativnom pružatelju usluge rješavanja sporova.
The EU-U.S.
Dodatak A
Privacy Shield Framework in Context: An Overview of the U.S. Privacy and Security Landscape
Okvir europsko-američkog sustava zaštite privatnosti u kontekstu: pregled sigurnosnih mjera i mjera za zaštitu privatnosti u SAD-u
The protections provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework (the ‘Framework’) exist in the context of the broader privacy protections afforded under the U.S. legal system as a whole.
Zaštita koju pruža okvir europsko-američkog sustava zaštite privatnosti („okvir”) postoji u širem kontekstu mjera za zaštitu privatnosti koje je uspostavio cijeli američki pravni sustav.
First, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (‘FTC’) has a robust privacy and data security program for U.S. commercial practices that protects consumers worldwide.
Prvo, Savezna trgovinska komisija („FTC”) ima čvrst sigurnosni sustav za zaštitu privatnosti i podataka za trgovinske prakse SAD-a kojim se štite potrošači diljem svijeta.
Second, the landscape of consumer privacy and security protection in the United States has evolved substantially since 2000 when the original U.S.-EU Safe Harbor program was adopted.
Drugo, mjere za privatnost i sigurnost potrošača stalno se razvijaju u SAD-u od 2000. kad je donesen prvi program „sigurne luke” između EU-a i SAD-a.
Since that time, many federal and state privacy and security laws have been enacted, and public and private litigation to enforce privacy rights has increased significantly.
U međuvremenu su doneseni brojni zakoni o privatnosti i sigurnosti na državnoj i federalnoj razini, a brojn privatnih i javnih sudskih postupaka o izvršenju prava privatnosti znatno se povećao.
The broad scope of U.S. legal protections for consumer privacy and security applicable to commercial data practices complements the protections provided to EU individuals by the new Framework.
Široki raspon pravnih zaštita SAD-a za privatnost i sigurnost potrošača koje se primjenjuju na tržišne podatke nadopunjuje zaštite koje pojedincima iz EU-a omogućuje novi Okvir.
I. THE FTC'S GENERAL PRIVACY AND SECURITY ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
I. PROGRAM PROVEDBE OPĆEG PROGRAMA FTC-A ZA SIGURNOST I PRIVATNOST
The FTC is the leading U.S. consumer protection agency focused on commercial sector privacy.
FTC je vodeća agencija za zaštitu potrošača u SAD-u s naglaskom na privatnost u trgovinskom sektoru.
The FTC has authority to prosecute unfair and deceptive acts or practices that violate consumer privacy, as well as to enforce more targeted privacy laws that protect certain financial and health information, information about children, and information used to make certain eligibility decisions about consumers.
FTC ima ovlasti za sudski progon nepoštenih i prijevarnih radnji ili praksi kojima se krši privatnost potrošača te za provedbu ciljanih zakona o privatnosti kojima su zaštićeni određeni financijski ili zdravstveni podaci, podaci o djeci te podaci na temelju kojih se donose određene odluke o prihvatljivosti o potrošačima.
The FTC has unparalleled experience in consumer privacy enforcement.
FTC ima bogato iskustvo u provođenju zakona o zaštiti potrošača.
The FTC's enforcement actions have addressed unlawful practices in offline and online environments.
U provedbi FTC je rješavao pitanja nezakonitih praksi na internetu i izvan njega.
For example, the FTC has brought enforcement actions against well-known companies, such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Wyndham, Oracle, HTC, and Snapchat, as well as lesser- known companies.
Naprimjer, FTC je pokrenuo mjere protiv poznatih poduzeća, kao što su Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Wyndham, Oracle, HTC i Snapchat, ali i protiv manje poznatih poduzeća.
The FTC has sued businesses that allegedly spammed consumers, installed spyware on computers, failed to secure consumers' personal information, deceptively tracked consumers online, violated children's privacy, unlawfully collected information on consumers' mobile devices, and failed to secure internet-connected devices used to store personal information.
FTC je pokrenuo tužbe protiv poduzeća koja su navodno slala neželjenu poštu potrošačima, postavila softver za prisluškivanje na računala, nisu osigurala osobne podatke potrošača, na prijevaru pratila potrošače na internetu, prekršila pravo djece na privatnost, nezakonito prikupljala podatke o potrošačima na njihovim mobilnim uređajima te koja nisu osigurala uređaje koji se mogu spojiti na internet na kojima se nalaze osobni podaci.
The resulting orders have typically provided for ongoing monitoring by the FTC for a period of 20 years, prohibited further law violations, and subjected the businesses to substantial financial penalties for order violations [1].
Nalozi nakon tih istraga uglavnom su za rezultat imali trajni nadzor FTC-a za razdoblje od dvadeset godina, zabranu daljnjeg kršenja zakona i izdavanje financijskih sankcija za poduzeća zbog kršenja naloga [1].
Importantly, FTC orders do not just protect the individuals who may have complained about a problem; rather, they protect all consumers dealing with the business going forward.
Što je još važnije, nalozima FTC-a ne štite se samo pojedinci koji su uložili pritužbu na određeni problem, već se njima štite svi potrošači koji posluju s poduzećima koja su predmet istrage.
In addition to these cases, the FTC has also issued and publicized warning letters [4].As part of its history of strong privacy enforcement, the FTC has also regularly looked for potential violations of the Safe Harbor program.
Uz te slučajeve, FTC je izdao javna pisma upozorenja [4].U okviru svojeg nastojanja da osigura zaštitu privatnosti FTC je istraživao i eventualna kršenja programa „sigurne luke”.
Since the Safe Harbor program was adopted, the FTC has undertaken numerous investigations into Safe Harbor compliance on its own initiative and has brought 39 cases against U.S. companies for Safe Harbor violations.
Od donošenja programa „sigurne luke” FTC je na vlastitu inicijativu pokrenuo brojne istrage o usklađenosti programa i pokrenuo 39 postupaka protiv američkih poduzeća zbog kršenja pravila programa „sigurne luke”.
The FTC will continue this proactive approach by making enforcement of the new Framework a priority.
FTC će nastaviti s tim proaktivnim pristupom u kojem je provedba novog okvira prioritet.
FEDERAL AND STATE PROTECTIONS FOR CONSUMER PRIVACY
MJERE ZA ZAŠTITU PRIVATNOSTI POTROŠAČA NA DRžAVNOJ I FEDERALNOJ RAZINI
The Safe Harbor Enforcement Overview, which appears as an annex to the European Commission's Safe Harbor adequacy decision, provides a summary of many of the federal and state privacy laws in place at the time the Safe Harbor program was adopted in 2000 [5].
Pregled provedbe „sigurne luke”, prilog odluci Europske komisije o odgovarajućoj razini zaštite „sigurne luke”, daje sažetak niza zakona o privatnosti na federalnoj i državnoj razini koji su bili na snazi kad je program „sigurne luke” donesen 2000.
Since 2000, there have been numerous developments at both the federal and state level that provide additional consumer privacy protections [6].
Od 2000. poduzeti su brojni koraci na federalnoj i državnoj razini za pružanje dodadtne zaštite privatnosti potrošača [6].
At the federal level, for example, the FTC amended the COPPA Rule in 2013 to provide a number of additional protections for children's personal information.
Naprimjer, FTC je na federalnoj razini izmijenio pravilo COPPA-e kako bi se dodatno zaštitili osobni podaci djece.
The FTC also issued two rules implementing the Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act — the Privacy Rule and the Safeguards Rule — which require financial institutions [7] to make disclosures about their information sharing practices and to implement a comprehensive information security program to protect consumer information [8].
FTC je izdao i dva propisa o privatnosti i mjerama zaštite kojima se provodi Zakon Gramm- Leach-Bliley kojima se od financijskih institucija [7] zahtijeva da otkriju svoje prakse dijeljenja podataka te da u praksi provedu sveukupni program sigurnosti podataka u cilju zaštite podataka o potrošačima [8].
Similarly, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act ( ‘FACTA’), enacted in 2003, supplements longstanding U.S. credit laws to establish requirements for the masking, sharing, and disposal of certain sensitive financial data.
Slično tome, Zakon o poštenim i pouzdanima kreditnim transakcijama (FACTA), donesen 2003., dopunjuje starije zakone SAD-a u cilju uspostave zahtjeva za prikrivanje, dijeljenje i uporabu određenih financijskih podataka osjetljive prirode.
The FTC promulgated a number of rules under FACTA regarding, among other things, consumers' right to a free annual credit report; secure disposal requirements for consumer report information; consumers' right to opt out of receiving certain offers of credit and insurance; consumers' right to opt out of the use of information provided by an affiliated company to market its products and services; and requirements for financial institutions and creditors to implement identity theft detection and prevention programs [9].
FTC je donio niz propisa u okviru FACTA-e o, među ostalim, pravu potrošača na besplatno godišnje financijsko izvješće, zahtjevima za sigurno brisanje podataka o potrošaču u izvješću, pravu potrošača da traži izuzeće od primanja ponuda o financijskim uslugama i osiguranju, pravu potrošača da traži izuzeće od primanja ponuda pridruženih poduzeća u kojima oglašavaju svoje proizvode i usluge i zahtjeva za financijske institucije i vjerovnike da provedu programe za utvrđivanje krađe identiteta i zaštite [9].
In addition, rules promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act were revised in 2013, adding additional safeguards to protect the privacy and security of personal health information [10].
Osim toga, propisi doneseni u okviru Zakona o zdravstvenom osiguranju (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) revidirani su 2013. i uvele su se dodatne zaštitne mjere za zaštitu i sigurnost podataka osobnih podataka u području zdravstva [10].
Rules protecting consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls, robocalls, and spam have also gone into effect.
Na snagu su stupili i propisi kojima se potrošači štite od neželjenih poziva telemarketinga, automatskih poziva i neželjene pošte.
Congress has also enacted laws requiring certain companies that collect health information to provide consumers with notification in the event of a breach [11]. States have also been very active in passing laws related to privacy and security.
Kongres je donio i zakone kojima se od određenih poduzeća koja prikupljaju zdravstvene podatke zahtijeva da potrošače obavijeste ako se krše njihova prava [11].Države su također donijele niz zakona o privatnosti i sigurnosti.
Since 2000, forty-seven states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have enacted laws requiring businesses to notify individuals of security breaches of personal information [12].
Od 2000. 47 država, Okrug Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico i Djevičanski otoci donijeli su zakone kojima se od poduzeća zahtijeva da obavijeste potrošače o sigurnosnim povredama osobnih podataka [12].
At least thirty-two states and Puerto Rico have data disposal laws, establishing requirements for the destruction or disposal of personal information [13].
Barem 32 države i Puerto Rico imaju zakone o brisanju podataka kojima se uvode zahtjevi za uništenje ili brisanje privatnih podataka [13].
A number of states also have enacted general data security laws.
Niz je država donio zakone o općoj sigurnosti podataka.
In addition, California has enacted various privacy laws, including a law requiring companies to have privacy policies and disclose their Do Not Track practices [14], a ‘Shine the Light’ law requiring greater transparency for data brokers [15], and a law that mandates an ‘eraser button’ allowing minors to request the deletion of certain social media information [16].
Osim toga, Kalifornija je donijela niz zakona o zaštiti privatnosti, uključujući zakon kojim se od poduzeća zahtijeva da provode vlastite pravila o zaštiti privatnosti te otkriju svoje prakse nepraćenja (Do Not Track) [14], Zakon „Shine the Light” za povećanje transparentnosti za posrednike podataka [15] i zakon kojim se uvodi opcija „eraser button” kojim se omogućuje maloljetnicima da zatraže brisanje podataka na društvenim medijima [16].
Using these laws and other authorities, federal and state governments have levied significant fines against companies that have failed to protect the privacy and security of consumers' personal information [17].Private lawsuits have also led to successful judgments and settlements that provide additional privacy and data security protection for consumers.
Na temelju tih zakona i drugih nadležnosti tijela na federalnoj i državnoj razini izdali su znatan broj kazni poduzećima koja nisu zaštitila privatnost osobnih podataka potrošača [17].Privatne tužbe imale su za rezultat uspješne presude i nagodbe kojima je omogućena dodatna sigurnost i zaštita osobnih podataka potrošača.
For example, in 2015, Target agreed to pay USD 10 million as part of a settlement with customers who claimed their personal financial information was compromised by a widespread data breach.
Naprimjer, poduzeće Target pristalo je isplatiti 2015. 10 milijuna USD u okviru nagodbe s potrošačima koji su tvrdili da je narušena sigurnost njihovih osobnih financijskih podataka zbog veće povrede podataka.
In 2013, AOL agreed to pay a USD 5 million settlement to resolve a class action involving alleged inadequate de- identification related to the release of search queries of hundreds of thousands of AOL members.
Poduzeće AOL pristalo je 2013. isplatiti 5 milijuna USD u okviru nagodbe nakon zajedničke tužbe koja se odnosila na navodno nedostatni postupak anonimizacije nakon što su objavljene pretrage stotine tisuća korisnika AOL-a.
Additionally, a federal court approved a USD 9 million payment by Netflix for allegedly keeping rental history records in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988.
Osim toga, federalni sud izdao je Netflixu obvezu isplate odštete u iznosu od 9 milijuna USD jer je sačuvao prijašnju evidenciju posudbe čime se prekršio Zakon o pravu na video privatnost iz 1988. (Video Privacy Protection Act).
Federal courts in California approved two separate settlements with Facebook, one for USD 20 million and another for USD 9,5 million, involving the company's collection, use, and sharing of its users' personal information.
Federalni sudovi u Kaliforniji odobrili dvije zasebne nagodbe s Facebookom, jednu u iznosu od 20 milijuna USD, a drugu u iznosu od 9,5 milijuna USD zbog načina na koji je poduzeće prikupljalo, dijelilo i koristile osobne podatke korisnika.
And, in 2008, a California state court approved a USD 20 million settlement with LensCrafters for unlawful disclosure of consumers' medical information.
Sud u Kaliforniji odobrio je 2008. nagodbu u visinu od 20 milijuna USD jer je poduzeće LensCrafters nezakonito otkrivalo zdravstvene podatke potrošača.