natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An application submitted pursuant to Article 270 TFEU shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and the decision responding to the complaint, together with an indication of the dates on which the complaint was submitted and the decision notified.’;
Tužbi podnesenoj na temelju članka 270. UFEU-a po potrebi se prilažu žalba u smislu članka 90. stavka 2. Pravilnika o osoblju i odluka o žalbi uz naznake dana podnošenja žalbe i dana dostave odluke.”;
in paragraph 5, which is renumbered paragraph 6, the reference to ‘paragraphs 1 to 4’ is replaced by a reference to ‘paragraphs 1 to 5’;
u stavku 5., koji postaje stavak 6., tekst „iz stavaka 1. do 4.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „iz stavaka 1. do 5.”
in Article 80(2), the reference to ‘Article 78(5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(6)’;
U članku 80. stavku 2. dio rečenice „člankom 78. stavkom 5.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „člankom 78. stavkom 6.”
in Article 81(2), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
U članku 81. stavku 2. tekst „članak 78. stavci 3. do 5.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavci 4. do 6.”
Article 86 is amended as follows:
7. Članak 86. mijenja se kako slijedi:
paragraphs 3 to 6 are renumbered paragraphs 4 to 7;
mijenja se numeracija stavaka 3. do 6., koji postaju stavci 4. do 7.;
the following is inserted as paragraph 3:
sljedeći tekst unosi se kao stavak 3.:
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the modification of the application must be made by a separate document and, by way of derogation from paragraph 2, within the time limit laid down in Article 91(3) of the Staff Regulations within which the annulment of the measure justifying the modification of the application may be sought.’;
U postupcima pokrenutim na temelju članka 270. UFEU-a prilagodba tužbe mora se izvršiti zasebnim aktom i, iznimno od stavka 2., u roku predviđenom člankom 91. stavkom 3. Pravilnika o osoblju, u kojem se može zahtijevati poništenje akta koji opravdava prilagodbu tužbe.”
in Article 110, the following paragraph 4 is added:
U članku 110. dodaje se stavak 4., koji glasi:
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the members of the formation of the Court and the Advocate General may in the course of the hearing invite the parties themselves to express their views on certain aspects of the case.’;
U postupcima pokrenutim na temelju članka 270. UFEU-a članovi sastava suda kao i nezavisni odvjetnik mogu tijekom rasprave pozvati stranke da se same izjasne o pojedinim aspektima predmeta.”
in Article 120, the words ‘or on the Civil Service Tribunal’ are deleted;
U članku 120. briše se dio rečenice „i Službeničkom sudu”.
in Article 124(1), the words ‘If, before the General Court has given its decision, the main parties reach a settlement of their dispute’ are replaced by the words ‘If, before the General Court has given its decision, the main parties reach an out-of-court settlement of their dispute’;
U članku 124. stavku 1. dio rečenice „Ako se, prije nego što je Opći sud donio odluku, glavne stranke nagode o rješenju spora” zamjenjuje se tekstom „Ako se, prije nego što je Opći sud donio odluku, glavne stranke izvan Općeg suda nagode o rješenju spora”.
after Article 125, a new chapter comprising four articles is added:
Nakon članka 125. dodaje se novo poglavlje s četiri članka:
‘Chapter 11a
„Poglavlje 11.a
PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO AMICABLE SETTLEMENTS INITIATED BY THE GENERAL COURT IN CASES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 270 TFEU
POSTUPAK MIRNOG RJEŠAVANJA SPOROVA NA INICIJATIVU OPĆEG SUDA U POSTUPCIMA POKRENUTIM NA TEMELJU ČLANKA 270. UFEU-a
Procedure
Način postupanja
The General Court may, at all stages of the procedure, examine the possibilities of an amicable settlement of all or part of the dispute between the main parties.
Opći sud u svakom stadiju postupka može ispitati mogućnosti mirnog rješavanja dijela spora ili cijelog spora između glavnih stranaka.
The General Court shall instruct the Judge-Rapporteur, assisted by the Registrar, to seek the amicable settlement of a dispute.
Opći sud povjerava sucu izvjestitelju, kojemu pomaže tajnik, da ispita mogućnosti mirnog rješavanja spora.
He may, in particular:
Osobito može:
invite the main parties to supply information or particulars;
pozvati glavne stranke da daju informacije ili pojašnjenja;
invite the main parties to produce documents;
pozvati glavne stranke da podnesu dokumente;
invite to meetings the main parties' representatives, the main parties themselves or any official or servant of the institution empowered to negotiate an agreement;
pozvati na sastanke zastupnike glavnih stranaka, same glavne stranke ili bilo kojeg dužnosnika ili službenika institucije ovlaštenog za pregovaranje o eventualnoj nagodbi;
on the occasion of the meetings referred to in point (c), have contact with each of the main parties separately, if they consent to that.
u slučaju sastanaka iz točke (c), imati odvojene kontakte sa svakom od glavnih stranaka, ako one na to pristanu.
Paragraphs 1 to 3 shall apply to proceedings for interim measures also.
Stavci 1. do 3. također se primjenjuju u okviru postupka privremene pravne zaštite.
Effect of the main parties' agreement
Učinak nagodbe glavnih stranaka
Where the main parties come to an agreement before the Judge-Rapporteur on a solution which brings the dispute to an end, they may request that the terms of that agreement be recorded in a document signed by the Judge-Rapporteur and by the Registrar.
Ako se glavne stranke pred sucem izvjestiteljem nagode o rješenju kojim se završava spor, mogu zatražiti da se sadržaj te nagodbe utvrdi aktom koji potpisuju sudac izvjestitelj i tajnik.
That document shall be served on the main parties and shall constitute an official record.
Taj se akt dostavlja glavnim strankama i javna je isprava.
At the request of a main party with the agreement of the other main party, the terms of the agreement reached by the main parties shall be recorded in the order removing the case from the register.
Na zahtjev jedne glavne stranke uz suglasnost druge, sadržaj nagodbe koju su glavne stranke postigle navodi se u rješenju o brisanju.
Where appropriate, he shall give a decision as to the costs of an intervener in accordance with Article 138.
Po potrebi, odlučuje o troškovima intervenijenta u skladu s člankom 138.
Article 125c
Članak 125.c
Specific register and file
Poseban upisnik i spis
Material produced in the context of the amicable settlement procedure as provided for in Article 125a:
Dokazni elementi podneseni u okviru postupka mirnog rješavanja spora u smislu članka 125.a:
shall be entered in a specific register which shall not be subject to the rules laid down in Articles 36 and 37,
upisuju se u poseban upisnik na koji se ne primjenjuju odredbe članaka 36. i 37.,
shall be placed in a file separate from the case file.
ulažu se u spis različit od spisa predmeta.
Material produced in the context of the amicable settlement procedure as provided for in Article 125a shall be brought to the attention of the main parties, with the exception of material which either of them has communicated to the Judge-Rapporteur in the separate meetings provided for in Article 125a(3)(d).
Glavne stranke upoznaju se s dokaznim elementima podnesenima u okviru postupka mirnog rješavanja spora u smislu članka 125.a, osim s onima koje je svaka od njih tijekom odvojenih kontakata predviđenih člankom 125.a stavkom 3. točkom (d) podnijela sucu izvjestitelju.
The main parties may have access to the material in the file separate from the case file as referred to in paragraph 1, with the exception of material which either of the main parties has communicated to the Judge-Rapporteur in the separate meetings provided for in Article 125a(3)(d).
Glavne stranke imaju pristup dokaznim elementima u spisu iz stavka 1., različitom od spisa predmeta, osim onim dokaznim elementima koje je svaka od njih podnijela sucu izvjestitelju tijekom odvojenih kontakata predviđenih člankom 125.a stavkom 3. točkom (d).
An intervener may not have access to material in the file separate from the case file as referred to in paragraph 1.
Intervenijent nema pristup dokaznim elementima u spisu iz stavka 1., različitom od spisa predmeta.
The parties may examine the specific register referred to in paragraph 1 at the Registry.
Uvid u poseban upisnik iz stavka 1. stranke mogu izvršiti u tajništvu.
Article 125d
Članak 125.d
Amicable settlement and judicial proceedings
Mirno rješavanje sporova i sudski postupak
No opinion expressed, suggestion made, proposal put forward, concession made or document drawn up for the purposes of the amicable settlement may be relied upon as evidence by the General Court or the main parties in the judicial proceedings.’;
Opći sud i glavne stranke ne mogu se u okviru sudskog postupka koristiti mišljenjima koja su izražena, prijedlozima koji su formulirani, tvrdnjama koje su istaknute, ustupcima koji su učinjeni ili dokumentima koji su sastavljeni u svrhu mirnog rješavanja spora.”
Article 127 is amended as follows:
12. Članak 127. mijenja se kako slijedi:
the heading ‘Referral of a case to the Court of Justice or to the Civil Service Tribunal’ is replaced by ‘Referral of a case to the Court of Justice’;
tekst naslova „Upućivanje predmeta Sudu ili Službeničkom sudu” zamjenjuje se tekstom „Upućivanje predmeta Sudu”;
the words ‘and in Article 8(2) of Annex I to the Statute’ are deleted;
briše se dio rečenice „i članka 8. stavka 2. Priloga I. Statutu”.
in Article 130(7), the second sentence, ‘It shall refer the case to the Court of Justice or to the Civil Service Tribunal if the case falls within their jurisdiction.’ is replaced by ‘It shall refer the case to the Court of Justice if the case falls within the latter's jurisdiction.’;
U članku 130. stavku 7. tekst druge rečenice „Predmet upućuje Sudu ili Službeničkom sudu, ako je on u njihovoj nadležnosti.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „Predmet upućuje Sudu, ako je on u njegovoj nadležnosti.”
in Article 135(1), the word ‘Exceptionally,’ is deleted;
U članku 135. stavku 1. briše se riječ „iznimno”.
in Article 143(4), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
U članku 143. stavku 4. tekst „članak 78. stavci 3. do 5.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavci 4. do 6.”
in Article 147(5):
U članku 147. stavku 5.:
the reference to ‘Article 78(3).’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4).’;
tekst „članka 78. stavka 3.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članka 78. stavka 4.”;
the reference to ‘Article 78(5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(6)’;
tekst „članak 78. stavak 5.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavak 6.”.
Article 156 is amended as follows:
17. Članak 156. mijenja se kako slijedi:
paragraphs 3 and 4 are renumbered paragraphs 4 and 5;
mijenja se numeracija stavaka 3. i 4., koji postaju stavci 4. i 5.;
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, an application of a kind referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may be presented as soon as the complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations has been submitted, on the conditions laid down in Article 91(4) of those Regulations.’;
U postupcima pokrenutim na temelju članka 270. UFEU-a zahtjevi iz stavaka 1. i 2. mogu se podnijeti prilikom podnošenja žalbe iz članka 90. stavka 2. Pravilnika o osoblju, u skladu s pretpostavkama iz članka 91. stavka 4. istog.”
in Article 173(5), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
U članku 173. stavku 5. tekst „članak 78. stavci 3. do 5.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavci 4. do 6.”
in Article 175(4), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
U članku 175. stavku 4. tekst „članak 78. stavci 3. do 5.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavci 4. do 6.”
Article 193 is amended as follows:
20. Članak 193. mijenja se kako slijedi:
in paragraph 1, the words ‘or at the Registry of the Civil Service Tribunal’ are deleted;
u stavku 1. briše se dio rečenice „ili Službeničkog suda”;
paragraph 2 is deleted;
briše se stavak 2.;
the number preceding the first paragraph is deleted;
briše se broj ispred stavka 1.
in Article 196(2), the words ‘Civil Service Tribunal’ are replaced by ‘General Court ruling as a court of first instance’, and the words ‘ruling as a court of appeal’ are added after the words ‘General Court’;
U članku 196. stavku 2. riječi „Službeničkom sudu” zamjenjuju se riječima „Općem sudu koji odlučuje kao prvostupanjski sud”, a riječi „kao žalbeni sud” dodaju se nakon riječi „Opći sud”.
in Article 213(3), the words ‘and to the Civil Service Tribunal’ are deleted.
U članku 213. stavku 3. briše se dio rečenice „i Službeničkom sudu”.
These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, authentic in the languages referred to in Article 44 of those Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on 1 September 2016.
Ove izmjene Poslovnika, vjerodostojne na jezicima iz članka 44. tog Poslovnika, objavljuju se u Službenom listu Europske unije i stupaju na snagu 1. rujna 2016.
Amendments of the Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court
Izmjene Praktičnih pravila za provedbu Poslovnika Općeg suda
Having regard to Article 224 of its Rules of Procedure;
uzimajući u obzir članak 224. svojeg Poslovnika,
Having regard to the Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court;
uzimajući u obzir Praktična pravila za provedbu Poslovnika Općeg suda,
HAS ADOPTED THESE AMENDMENTS OF THE PRACTICE RULES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE GENERAL COURT:
DONOSI OVE IZMJENE PRAKTIČNIH PRAVILA ZA PROVEDBU POSLOVNIKA OPĆEG SUDA:
After point 14, the following is inserted as point 14a:
Nakon točke 14. umeće se sljedeći tekst kao točka 14.a:
In accordance with Article 125c of the Rules of Procedure, material produced in the context of the amicable settlement procedure referred to in Articles 125a to 125d of the Rules of Procedure shall be entered in a specific register which shall not be subject to the rules set out in Articles 36 and 37 of those Rules.’
U skladu s člankom 125.c Poslovnika, dokazni elementi podneseni u okviru postupka mirnog rješavanja sporova iz članaka 125.a do 125.d Poslovnika upisuju se u poseban upisnik na koji se ne primjenjuju odredbe članaka 36. i 37. tog Poslovnika.”
After point 24, the following is inserted as point 24a:
Nakon točke 24. umeće se sljedeći tekst kao točka 24.a:
Material produced in the context of the amicable settlement procedure as provided for in Article 125a of the Rules of Procedure shall be placed in a file separate from the case-file.’
Dokazni elementi podneseni u okviru postupka mirnog rješavanja sporova u smislu članka 125.a Poslovnika ulažu se u spis različit od spisa predmeta.”
In point 26, the first sentence is replaced by the following:
U točki 26. prva rečenica zamjenjuje se sljedećim tekstom:
At the close of the proceedings before the Court, the Registry shall arrange for the case-file and the file referred to in Article 125c(1) of the Rules of Procedure to be closed and archived.’
Po okončanju postupka pred Općim sudom, tajništvo zaključuje i arhivira spis predmeta kao i spis iz članka 125.c stavka 1. Poslovnika.”
After point 33, the following is inserted as point 33a:
Nakon točke 33. umeće se sljedeći tekst kao točka 33.a:
The requirements of points 28 to 33 above do not apply to access to the file referred to in Article 125c(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Odredbe iz točaka 28. do 33. gore ne odnose se na pristup spisu iz članka 125.c stavka 1. Poslovnika.
Access to that specific file is governed by Article 125c of the Rules of Procedure.’
Na pristup tom posebnom spisu primjenjuje se ista ta odredba Poslovnika.”
In point 110, the reference to ‘Article 78(5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(6)’.
U točki 110. tekst „člankom 78. stavkom 5.,” zamjenjuje se tekstom „člankom 78. stavkom 6.,”.
Point 114 is replaced by the following:
7. Točka 114. zamjenjuje se sljedećim tekstom:
In direct actions within the meaning of Article 1 of the Rules of Procedure, the maximum number of pages shall be as follows.
U izravnim tužbama u smislu članka 1. Poslovnika najveći dopušteni broj stranica podnesaka je sljedeći:
50 pages for the application and for the defence,
50 stranica za tužbu i za odgovor na tužbu,
25 pages for the reply and for the rejoinder,
25 stranica za repliku i za odgovor na repliku,
20 pages for a plea of inadmissibility and for observations thereon,
20 stranica za podnesak o prigovoru nedopuštenosti i za očitovanja na njega,
30 pages for the application and for the defence,
30 stranica za tužbu i za odgovor na tužbu,
15 pages for the reply and for the rejoinder,
15 stranica za repliku i za odgovor na repliku,
10 pages for a plea of inadmissibility and for observations thereon,
10 stranica za podnesak o prigovoru nedopuštenosti i za očitovanja na njega,
After point 140, the following is inserted as point 140a:
Nakon točke 140. umeće se sljedeći tekst kao točka 140.a:
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the institutions should preferably annex to the defence any acts of general application cited which have not been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, together with details of the dates of their adoption, their entry into force and, where applicable, their repeal.’
U postupcima pokrenutima na temelju članka 270. UFEU-a poželjno je da institucije odgovoru na tužbu prilože opće akte koje navode, a koji se ne objavljuju u Službenom listu Europske unije, uz naznaku dana njihova donošenja, njihova stupanja na snagu i, prema potrebi, njihova stavljanja izvan snage.”
In point 243, the reference to ‘Article 78(3)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4)’.
U točki 243. tekst „članka 78. stavka 3.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članka 78. stavka 4.”.
In point 264, the reference to ‘Article 156(4)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 156(5)’.
U točki 264. tekst „člankom 156. stavkom 4.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „člankom 156. stavkom 5.”.
Annex 1 is amended as follows:
11. Prilog 1. mijenja se kako slijedi:
in the introductory part, the reference to ‘Article 78(5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(6)’;
u uvodnom dijelu tekst „člankom 78. stavkom 5.,” zamjenjuje se tekstom „člankom 78. stavkom 6.,”;
in point (b), the reference in the first column to ‘Article 78(3)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4)’;
u točki (b) tekst u prvom stupcu „članak 78. stavak 3.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavak 4.”;
points e) to g) are renumbered points f) to h);
točke (e) do (g) postaju točke (f) do (h);
the following is inserted in the first column as point (e):
sljedeći tekst umeće se u prvom stupcu kao točka (e):
production of the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and the decision responding to the complaint (Article 78(2) of the Rules of Procedure)’;
podnošenje žalbe u smislu članka 90. stavka 2. Poslovnika o osoblju i odluke o žalbi (članak 78. stavak 2. Poslovnika)”;
in point (e), now point (f), the reference in the first column to ‘Article 78(2)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(3)’;
u točki (e), koja postaje točka (f), tekst u prvom stupcu „članak 78. stavak 2. Poslovnika” zamjenjuje se tekstom „članak 78. stavak 3. Poslovnika”;
the following is inserted in the first column as point (h):
sljedeći tekst umeće se u prvom stupcu kao točka (h):
indication of the dates on which the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations was submitted and the decision responding to the complaint notified (Article 78(2) of the Rules of Procedure)’.
naznaka dana podnošenja žalbe u smislu članka 90. stavka 2. Pravilnika o osoblju i dostave odluke o žalbi (članak 78. stavak 2. Poslovnika)”.
They shall enter into force on 1 September 2016.
Stupaju na snagu 1. rujna 2016.
The text must be presented in accordance with the requirements set out in point 96(c) of these Practice Rules.’
Tekst mora biti u obliku u skladu s odredbama točke 96. podtočke (c) ovih praktičnih provedbenih pravila.”
The Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court [1] are hereby amended as follows:1.
Praktična pravila za provedbu Poslovnika Općeg suda [1] mijenjaju se kako slijedi:1.
In point 14, the words ‘in the cases provided for in the first paragraph of Article 54 of the Statute and in Article 8(1) of the Annex to the Statute, the date on which the procedural document was lodged with the Registrar of the Court of Justice or with the Registrar of the Civil Service Tribunal.’ are replaced by ‘in the cases provided for in the first paragraph of Article 54 of the Statute, the date on which the procedural document was lodged with the Registrar of the Court of Justice.’.
U točki 14. dio rečenice „u slučajevima predviđenima člankom 54. stavkom 1. Statuta i člankom 8. stavkom 1. Priloga tom Statutu, dan podnošenja postupovnog akta tajniku Suda ili tajniku Službeničkog suda.” zamjenjuje se tekstom „u slučajevima predviđenima člankom 54. stavkom 1. Statuta, dan podnošenja postupovnog akta tajniku Suda.”.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1
amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for bifenazate, boscalid, cyazofamid, cyromazine, dazomet, dithiocarbamates, fluazifop-P, mepanipyrim, metrafenone, picloram, propamocarb, pyridaben, pyriofenone, sulfoxaflor, tebuconazole, tebufenpyrad and thiram in or on certain products
o izmjeni prilogâ II. i III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o maksimalnim razinama ostataka za bifenazat, boskalid, ciazofamid, ciromazin, dazomet, ditiokarbamate, fluazifop-P, mepanipirim, metrafenon, pikloram, propamokarb, piridaben, piriofenon, sulfoksaflor, tebukonazol, tebufenpirad i tiram u ili na određenim proizvodima
For bifenazate, cyazofamid, cyromazine, mepanipyrim, metrafenone, propamocarb and tebuconazole maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO) za bifenzat, ciazofamid, ciromazin, mepanipirim, metrafenon, propamokarb i tebukonazol utvrđene su u Prilogu II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
For dithiocarbamates and thiram MRLs were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
MRO-ovi za ditiokarbamate i tiram utvrđeni su u Prilogu II. i dijelu B Priloga III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
For boscalid, dazomet, fluazifop-P, picloram, pyridaben, pyriofenone and tebufenpyrad MRLs were set in Part A of Annex III to that Regulation.
MRO-ovi za boskalid, dazomet, fluazifop-P, pikloram, piridaben, piriofenon i tebufenpirad utvrđeni su u dijelu A Priloga III. toj Uredbi.
For sulfoxaflor no specific MRLs were set nor was the substance included in Annex IV to that Regulation, so the default value of 0,01 mg/kg laid down in Article 18(1)(b) applies.
Za sulfoksaflor specifični MRO-ovi nisu bili utvrđeni niti je tvar bila navedena u Prilogu IV. navedenoj Uredbi, stoga se primjenjuje zadana vrijednost od 0,01 mg/kg utvrđena u članku 18. stavku 1. točki (b) te Uredbe.
In the context of a procedure for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance bifenazate on blueberries, cranberries, gooseberries and azaroles, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRLs.
U okviru postupka odobrenja uporabe sredstva za zaštitu bilja koje sadržava aktivnu tvar bifenazat na borovnicama, brusnicama, ogrozdima i azarolama podnesen je zahtjev za izmjenu postojećih MRO-ova u skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005.
As regards boscalid, such an application was submitted for beans and peas (with pods).
U pogledu boskalida takav je zahtjev podnesen za grah i grašak (s mahunama).
As regards cyazofamid, such an application was submitted for aubergines.
U pogledu ciazofamida takav je zahtjev podnesen za patlidžane.