natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The discontinuation of the services of AUA would have meant for KLU to lose its main airline which would have led to liabilities exceeding the assets.
Prestanak pružanja usluga AUA-a značio bi da bi KLU izgubio glavnog zračnog prijevoznika, što bi dovelo do prezaduženosti.
Upon request by the Commission, Austria produced a detailed reconstructed ex ante analysis of the financial situation of KFBG on 20 October 2005.
Na zahtjev Komisije Austrija je izradila detaljnu rekonstruiranu ex ante analizu financijske situacije KFBG-a 20. listopada 2005.
Reconstructed ex ante analysis of four different scenarios between KFBG and AUA
Rekonstruirana ex ante analiza četiriju scenarija odnosa između KFBG-a i AUA
Calculation of scenarios on basis of extrapolation of 2005
Izračun scenarija na osnovi ekstrapolacije 2005.
Including AUA as full Paying Agent
Uključivanje AUA-a kao punog isplatitelja
Complete omission AUA
Potpuno izostavljanje AUA-a
Including AUA with Incentive
Uključivanje AUA-a s poticajima
Process year AUA
AUA u godini postupka
Earnings
Zarada
Annual earnings
Godišnja zarada
Cash Flow after investments
Novčani tok nakon ulaganja
Basis 2005 in TEUR
Osnova iz 2005. u tisućama EUR
Departing passengers
Odlazni putnici
Revenues Aviation
Prihodi od zračnog prijevoza
Incentive
Poticaj
Value adjustment Revenues AAG
Vrijednosno usklađenje prihoda AAG-a
Revenues Aeronautical
Zrakoplovni prihodi
Other revenues
Ostali prihodi
Material expenses
Materijalni troškovi
Personnel expenses
Troškovi osoblja
Project costs
Troškovi projekta
Reimbursement Marketing cooperations
Nadoknade u okviru marketinških partnerstava
Financial result
Financijski rezultat
Annual results
Godišnji rezultati
Cash flow (Net profit plus Afa)
Novčani tok (neto dobit i Afa)
Necessary replacement investments per year TEUR 1500-2000
Potrebna zamjenska ulaganja godišnje u tisućama EUR 1500–2000
Project AAG Destination Vienna and Frankfurt 2005
Projekt AAG za odredišta Beč i Frankfurt 2005.
MTOW (Vienna and Frankfurt)
MTOW (Beč i Frankfurt)
Departing passengers (Vienna and Frankfurt)
Odlazni putnici (Beč i Frankfurt)
Rotations
Povratni letovi
Project revenues
Prihodi projekta
Project costs/marginal costs
Troškovi projekta/granični troškovi
Traffic Handling
Upravljanje prometom
Flight dependent
Ovisno o letovima
Passenger dependent
Ovisno o putnicima
Total project costs rounded
Ukupni troškovi projekta zaokruženo
Project success rounded
Uspjeh projekta zaokruženo
Incentive rounded
Poticaj zaokruženo
In preparing the analysis in Table 8, Austria took the following considerations into account.
U pripremi analize iz tablice 8. Austrija je u obzir uzela sljedeća razmatranja.
The analysis presents four different scenarios and their respective financial results for KFBG:
U analizi su prikazana četiri različita scenarija i njihovi financijski rezultati za KFBG:
the scenario of continuing the agreement with AUA paying the full airport charges as prior to October 2003 (the situation if AUA would have continued to pay the charges);
scenarij u kojem se i dalje primjenjuje sporazum s AUA-om u okviru kojeg on plaća cjelokupne naknade zračne luke kao i prije listopada 2003. (situacija do koje bi došlo da je AUA nastavio plaćati naknade);
the scenario of a complete discontinuation of all services at KLU by AUA;
scenarij potpunog prestanka svih AUA-ovih usluga na KLU-u;
the scenario of continuation of the agreement with AUA with application of the 2005 incentive scheme (signing the settlement agreement); and
scenarij u kojem se i dalje primjenjuje sporazum s AUA-om uz primjenu programa poticaja iz 2005. (potpisivanje sporazuma o nagodbi); i
the scenario with a continuation of the agreement with AUA continuing to pay only part of the airport charges due (the situation without signing the settlement agreement).
scenarij u kojem se i dalje primjenjuje sporazum s AUA-om u okviru kojeg on nastavlja plaćati samo dio važećih naknada zračne luke (situacija do koje bi došlo bez potpisivanja sporazuma o nagodbi).
The Commission takes note, that only the last three scenarios were possible alternatives for KFBG in the situation of the litigations with AUA, as the first scenario was only of theoretical nature.
Komisija napominje da su samo zadnja tri scenarija bila moguće alternative za KFBG u situaciji sudskih sporova s AUA-om, dok je prvi scenarij bio samo teoretske prirode.
Out of these three scenarios however only the third scenario seemed to be a reasonable alternative for a MEO being in the situation of KFBG.
Međutim, od ta tri scenarija samo se treći scenarij činio razumnom alternativom za subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu u situaciji u kojoj se nalazio KFBG.
In the fourth scenario in which KFBG would not have signed the settlement agreement and AUA would have continued to pay only part of the airport charges, the financial situation of KFBG and its liquidity would have further deteriorated.
U četvrtom scenariju, u kojem KFBG ne bi potpisao sporazum o nagodbi te bi AUA nastavio plaćati samo dio naknada zračne luke, financijska situacija KFBG-a i njegova likvidnost još bi se više pogoršali.
In comparison with the other scenarios the scenario four would have led to a clear negative cash flow for the future of KFBG.
U usporedbi s ostalim scenarijima, četvrti bi scenarij u budućnosti KFBG-a doveo do jasno negativnog novčanog toka.
Even worse would have been the result in scenario two, in case AUA would have discontinued its services to KLU as a result of not signing the settlement agreement and continuation of the litigations.
Još bi gori bio rezultat drugog scenarija, kada bi zbog nepotpisivanja sporazuma o nagodbi i nastavka sudskih sporova AUA prestao pružati svoje usluge KLU-u.
In this scenario the cash flow would have been even worse for KFBG for the future.
U tom bi se scenariju novčani tok KFBG-a u budućnosti još više pogoršao.
In light of these considerations, the Commission notes that the third scenario was the only reasonable scenario to choose for a MEO in the situation of KFBG in October 2005.
S obzirom na ta razmatranja Komisija konstatira da je, za subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu u situaciji u kojoj se KFBG nalazio u listopadu 2005., treći scenarij bio jedini koji ima smisla.
The third scenario meant that AUA would pay the airport charges due, but not the full amount, i.e. only EUR […] of the total debt of EUR […].
Treći scenarij značio je da bi AUA platio dospjele naknade zračne luke, ali ne puni iznos, već samo […] EUR od ukupnog duga koji je iznosio […] EUR.
A MEO would have taken the partial losses of the airport charges into account in evaluating the positive effects of the settlement agreement: Due to the settlement agreement nearly two thirds of the total debt would be paid by AUA, leading to a positive cash flow in the future, removing the liquidity problems of KLU and assuring at the same time the continuation of the regular air services of AUA at KLU.
Subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu uzeo bi u obzir djelomične gubitke naknada zračne luke pri procjeni pozitivnih učinaka sporazuma o nagodbi: sklapanjem sporazuma o nagodbi AUA bi platio gotovo dvije trećine ukupnog duga, što bi dovelo do pozitivnog novčanog toka u budućnosti, a time bi se uklonili problemi likvidnosti KLU-a i istodobno osigurao nastavak redovnih usluga zračnog prijevoza koje AUA pruža na KLU-u.
The expected discounted result of the third scenario was positive.
Očekivani diskontirani rezultat trećeg scenarija bio je pozitivan.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that from an ex ante perspective, a private MEO would have signed the settlement agreement instead of choosing one of the other alternatives.
Stoga Komisija zaključuje da bi iz ex ante perspektive privatni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu potpisao sporazum o nagodbi umjesto da odabere jednu od ostalih alternativa.
The Commission finds that KFBG/DMG acted like a MEO in concluding the settlement agreement with AUA.
Komisija zaključuje da je KFBG/DMG pri sklapanju sporazuma o nagodbi s AUA-om djelovao kao subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
Therefore, the decision to conclude the settlement agreement did not grant AUA any economic advantage and does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Stoga odlukom o sklapanju sporazuma o nagodbi AUA-u nije data nikakva gospodrska prednost i odluka ne čini državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. UFEU-a.
The 2002 agreements with Ryanair, LV and AMS
Sporazumi s Ryanairom, LV-om i AMS-om iz 2002.
Providing such services is an economic activity.
Pružanje tih usluga gospodarska je djelatnost.
Ryanair, LV and AMS therefore constitute undertakings within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Ryanair, LV i AMS stoga su poduzetnici u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. UFEU-a.
For the criteria used to assess the existence of State resources and imputability to the State reference is made to recitals 224 to 232.
Za kriterije za procjenu postojanja državnih sredstava i mogućnost pripisivanja državi vidjeti uvodne izjave od 224. do 232.
The Commission notes that KFBG/DMG are owned 100 % by the State.
Komisija napominje da je KFBG/DMG u 100-postotnom vlasništvu države.
Until 2003 the shares of KFBG/DMG were held by the Republic of Austria 60 %, the State of Carinthia 20 % and Klagenfurt city 20 %.
Do 2003. dionice KFBG/DMG-a bile su u vlasništvu Republike Austrije (60 %), pokrajine Koruške (20 %) i grada Klagenfurta (20 %).
In April 2003 the State of Carinthia took over the shares of the Republic of Austria.
U travnju 2003. pokrajina Koruška preuzela je dionice Republike Austrije.
Since 2003 the shares were therefore held by the State of Carinthia 80 % and Klagenfurt city 20 %.
Stoga su od 2003. dionice bile u vlasništvu pokrajine Koruške (80 %) i grada Klagenfurta (20 %).
KFBG/DMG must thus be considered public undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Commission Directive 2006/111/EC whose funds are State resources.
KFBG/DMG stoga se mora smatrati javnim poduzećem u smislu članka 2. točke (b) Direktive Komisije 2006/111/EZ čija su sredstva državna sredstva.
The 2002 agreements with Ryanair, AMS and LV are also imputable to the State.
Državi se mogu pripisati i sporazumi s Ryanairom, AMS-om i LV-om iz 2002.
First, this was declared by Austria with the explanation that the State of Carinthia was involved in the conclusion of all marketing agreements between KFBG/DMG and the airlines.
Prvo, to je izjavila Austrija u objašnjenju da je pokrajina Koruška bila uključena u sklapanje svih tržišnih sporazuma između KFBG/DMG-a i zračnih prijevoznika.
More generally, the State of Carinthia was kept informed about the evolution related to all agreements via the management and supervisory boards of KFBG and DMG.
Općenito, pokrajina Koruška bila je informirana o razvoju svih sporazuma preko upravnog odbora i nadzornog odbora KFBG-a i DMG-a.
The State of Carinthia saw the conclusion of the different agreements as being in the interest of Carinthia.
Pokrajina Koruška smatrala je da je sklapanje različitih sporazuma bilo u interesu Koruške.
Second, the State of Carinthia financed the marketing costs occurred through the marketing agreements concluded by KFBG/DMG.
Drugo, pokrajina Koruška financirala je troškove marketinga proizašle iz tržišnih sporazuma sklopljenih od strane KFBG/DMG-a.
Austria also explicitly confirmed this involvement with reference to the 2002 agreements with Ryanair and AMS.
Austrija je izričito potvrdila tu uključenost i s obzirom na sporazume s Ryanairom i AMS-om iz 2002.
This participation and involvement of the government in the 2002 agreements is further confirmed by the minutes of the meetings of the government of the State of Carinthia, in which the conclusion of the air service agreements as well as the marketing agreements were discussed.
To sudjelovanje i uključenost vlade u sporazume iz 2002. dodatno potvrđuju zapisnici sa sastanaka vlade pokrajine Koruške na kojima se raspravljalo o sklapanju sporazuma o zračnim uslugama i o sporazumima o marketingu.
Further, the costs of these 2002 agreements were borne by the State of Carinthia and the City of Klagenfurt (see Section 7.1), a financing by the State which was agreed prior to the conclusion of the agreement with the airline and which required that the State of Carinthia at least implicitly agrees with the agreements.
Nadalje, troškove tih sporazuma iz 2002. snosili su pokrajina Koruška i grad Klagenfurt (vidjeti odjeljak 7.1.), a to je državno financiranje dogovoreno prije sklapanja sporazuma sa zračnim prijevoznikom i zahtijevalo je da pokrajina Koruška barem implicitno odobri sporazume.
The organic structure and influence chain is a further indicator of imputability of the conclusion of the agreement package to the State.
Organizacijska struktura i lanac utjecaja daljnji su pokazatelji mogućnosti pripisivanja sklapanja paketa sporazuma državi.
As described in recitals 228 to 232, the decisions of the State of Carinthia and the city of Klagenfurt were imputable to the State.
Kako je opisano u uvodnim izjavama od 228. do 232., odluke pokrajine Koruške i grada Klagenfurta mogu se pripisati državi.
Both shareholders of KFBG appointed the supervisory board of KFBG/DMG (which in turn appointed the management) with the result that the supervisory board (and management) of KFBG also represented the proportions of the political parties represented in the government of the State of Carinthia.
Oba dioničara KFBG-a imenovala su nadzorni odbor KFBG/DMG-a (koji je pak imenovao upravu), a kao rezultat toga sastav nadzornog odbora (i uprave) KFBG-a odražavao je odnos snaga političkih stranaka zastupljenih u parlamentu pokrajine Koruške.
The state of Carinthia and the city of Klagenfurt, as the sole shareholders of KFBG/DMG and by appointing the supervisory boards of KFBG/DMG (which in turn appoint the management), can be presumed to have a dominant influence over KFBG/DMG, and can control its resources.
Budući da su pokrajina Koruška i grad Klagenfurt jedini dioničari KFBG/DMG-a i imenuju nadzorne odbore KFBG/DMG-a (koji pak imenuju upravu), može se pretpostaviti da imaju dominantan utjecaj nad KFBG/DMG-om i da mogu kontrolirati njegova sredstva.
When concluding the agreements with Ryanair, KFBG also actively represented the State of Carinthia's interest in the existence and maintenance of a viable and performing airport at Klagenfurt for the State of Carinthia.
Pri sklapanju sporazuma s Ryanairom KFBG je aktivno zastupao interes pokrajine Koruške u postojanju i očuvanju održive i uspješne zračne luke u Klagenfurtu za pokrajinu Korušku.
Austria confirmed that the agreements concluded between KFBG/DMG and Ryanair and its subsidiaries are imputable to the State of Carinthia in the sense of the Stardust Marine jurisprudence.
Austrija je potvrdila da se sporazumi koje je KFBG/DMG sklopio s Ryanairom i njegovim društvima kćerima mogu pripisati pokrajini Koruški u smislu sudske prakse u predmetu Stardust Marine.
In the light of these considerations, the Commission considers that there are sufficient indicators to find that the conclusion of the 2002 agreements between KFBG/DMG and Ryanair/LV/AMS are imputable to the State.
S obzirom na ta razmatranja, Komisija smatra da postoji dovoljno pokazatelja kako bi se utvrdilo da se sklapanje sporazuma iz 2002. između KFBG/DMG-a i Ryanaira/LV-a/AMS-a može pripisati državi.
Application of the Market Economy Operator Principle to the 2002 agreements with Ryanair, LV and AMS
Primjena načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu na sporazume s Ryanairom, LV-om i AMS-om iz 2002.
With regard to the application of the MEO principle reference is made to the description at recitals 261 to 278 above.
S obzirom na primjenu načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu upućuje se na opis u uvodnim izjavama od 261. do 278.
In order to apply this principle, taking into account the facts of this case, the Commission considers that the first step should be to address the following issues:
U svrhu primjene tog načela i uzimajući u obzir činjenice o okolnostima ovog predmeta, Komisija smatra da najprije treba odgovoriti na sljedeća pitanja:
whether the marketing services agreement and the airport services agreements should be analysed separately or together,
Bi li sporazum o marketinškim uslugama i sporazum o uslugama zračne luke trebalo analizirati zajedno ili odvojeno?
what benefits a hypothetical MEO acting in place of KFBG/DMG could have expected to gain from marketing services agreements,
Koje bi koristi pretpostavljeni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji djeluje umjesto KFBG/DMG-a mogao očekivati od sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama?
the relevance, for the purposes of applying the MEO principle, of comparing the terms of the airport services agreements referred to in the formal investigation procedure with the airport charges billed at other airports.
Za potrebe primjene načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu, koliko je relevantna usporedba uvjeta sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke na koji se upućuje u formalnom istražnom postupku s naknadama zračne luke koje naplaćuju druge zračne luke?
After addressing the above issues, the next step for the Commission will be to apply the MEO principle to the 2002 agreements with Ryanair, LV and AMS.
Nakon razmatranja prethodno navedenih pitanja, sljedeći korak za Komisiju bit će primjena načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu na sporazume s Ryanairom, LV-om i AMS-om iz 2002.
Regarding an analysis of the marketing services agreements and the airport services agreement together
O zajedničkoj analizi sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama i sporazuma o uslugama zračne luke
The Commission considers that in applying the MEO test, two types of measures covered by the formal investigation in this case, namely the airports service agreement and the three marketing services agreements, must be evaluated together as one single measure.
Komisija smatra da se pri primjeni testa subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu dvije vrste mjera obuhvaćenih službenom istragom u ovom predmetu, odnosno sporazum o uslugama zračne luke i tri sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama, moraju evaluirati zajedno, kao jedna mjera.
This approach concerns the airport services agreement concluded between Ryanair and KFBG, on the one hand, and the marketing services agreements between DMG and LV as well as AMS, on the other hand.
Taj se pristup odnosi na sporazum o uslugama zračne luke između Ryanaira i KFBG-a s jedne strane i sporazume o marketinškim uslugama između DMG-a i LV-a te AMS-a s druge strane.
There are several indications pointing towards the fact that those agreements should be evaluated as one single measure since they were entered into within the framework of a single transaction.
Postoji nekoliko naznaka koje upućuju na to da bi te sporazume trebalo evaluirati kao jednu mjeru jer su sklopljeni u okviru jedne transakcije.
First of all, the contracts were entered into by essentially the same parties:
Prvo, ugovore su u biti sklopile iste stranke:
LV is a 100 % subsidiary of Ryanair.
LV je društvo kći u 100-postotnom vlasništvu Ryanaira.
The two marketing services agreements were signed on behalf of LV by Mr Sean Coyle, director of LV who had also a number of managerial positions at Ryanair such as director of scheduled revenue as well as head of route selection, profitability, network strategy, capacity allocation, investor relations and commercial director.
Dva sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama u ime LV-a potpisao je Sean Coyle, direktor LV-a koji je obnašao i nekoliko rukovodećih funkcija u Ryanairu, konkretno bio je direktor prihoda od redovnih linija te voditelj odabira linija, profitabilnosti, strategije mreže, raspodjele kapaciteta, odnosa s ulagačima i komercijalni direktor.
For the purpose of the application of State aid rules, LV and Ryanair are considered to be a single undertaking, in the sense that LV acts as an intermediary in the interest and under the control of Ryanair.
Za potrebe primjene pravila o državnim potporama, LV i Ryanair smatraju se jednim poduzetnikom, u smislu da LV djeluje kao posrednik u interesu Ryanaira i pod njegovom kontrolom.
This can also be inferred from the fact that the two marketing services agreements state in their preamble that ‘DMG wishes to appoint LV to […] provide new scheduled passenger air services from locations within the United Kingdom and/or continental Europe to using environmentally-friendly modern jet aircraft with a capacity of not less than 140 sets (‘the Services’)’.
To se može zaključiti i na temelju činjenice da se u preambulama dvaju sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama navodi da „DMG želi imenovati LV […] radi pružanja usluga redovnog zračnog prijevoza putnika na novim linijama s lokacija u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini i/ili kontinentalnoj Europi upotrebom modernog ekološki prihvatljivog mlaznog zrakoplova s kapacitetom od najmanje 140 sjedala (‚Usluge’)”.
The first marketing agreement of 22 January 2002 also states that ‘Operation of the Services should continue to be 348 rotations per annum (87 rotations per quarter) with effect from […].’ These statements demonstrate how strongly these marketing agreements are interlinked with the airport services agreement between Ryanair and KFBG.
U prvom tržišnom sporazumu od 22. siječnja 2002. navodi se i da bi se „obavljanje Usluga trebalo nastaviti sa 348 povratnih letova godišnje (87 povratnih letova po tromjesečju), s učinkom od […]”. Te izjave pokazuju u kojoj su mjeri ti sporazumi o marketingu međusobno povezani sa sporazumom o uslugama zračne luke između Ryanaira i KFBG-a.
AMS is also a 100 % subsidiary of Ryanair.
I AMS je društvo kći u 100-postotnom vlasništvu Ryanaira.
The marketing services agreement was signed on behalf of AMS by Mr Eddie Wilson, director of AMS who had also managerial positions at Ryanair such as director of personnel and in-flight.
Sporazum o marketinškim uslugama u ime AMS-a je potpisao Eddie Wilson, direktor AMS-a koji je obnašao i rukovodeće funkcije u Ryanairu, konkretno bio je direktor za osoblje i uslugu u zrakoplovu.
For the purpose of the application of State aid rules, AMS and Ryanair are considered to be a single undertaking, in the sense that AMS acts as an intermediary in the interest and under the control of Ryanair.
Za potrebe primjene pravila o državnim potporama, društvo AMS i Ryanair smatraju se jednim poduzetnikom u smislu da društvo AMS djeluje kao posrednik u interesu Ryanaira i pod njegovom kontrolom.
For this agreement, this can also be inferred from the fact that the marketing services agreement refers in its preamble several times to the website of Ryanair: ‘DMG wishes to appoint AMS to provide internet links to the highly successful travel website www.ryanair.com. […] AMS has successfully developed and continues to operate the travel website www.ryanair.com. […] the parties have decided involving the use of the www.ryanair.com website as a marketing tool[…].’ These statements show the identical interest of AMS and Ryanair in this agreement.
Kad je riječ o ovom sporazumu, to se može zaključiti i iz činjenice da se u preambuli sporazuma o marketinškim uslugama nekoliko puta upućuje na web-mjesto Ryanaira: „DMG želi imenovati AMS radi uspostave internetskih poveznica na vrlo uspješno web-mjesto za putovanja – www.ryanair.com. […] AMS je uspješno razvio i nastavlja upravljati web-mjestom za putovanja www.ryanair.com. […] su stranke odlučile što uključuje upotrebu web-mjesta www.ryanair.com kao marketinškog alata […].” Iz tih se izjava može vidjeti identičan interes AMS-a i Ryanaira u tom sporazumu.
DMG is a 100 % subsidiary of KFBG.
DMG je društvo kći u 100-postotnom vlasništvu KFBG-a.
As it was noted in recital 313 et seq., the decisions of KFBG to conclude airport services agreements with airlines such as Ryanair were imputable to the State.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama 313. i dalje, odluke KFBG-a da sklopi sporazume o uslugama zračne luke sa zračnim prijevoznicima kao što je Ryanair mogu se pripisati državi.
The controlling influence over KFBG/DMG was, in this regard, exercised by the State of Carinthia.
Kontrolni utjecaj nad KFBG/DMG-om u tom je pogledu imala pokrajina Koruška.