natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In so doing, and having regard to the special circumstances in Île-de-France, as stated in recitals 16 and 17, the mechanisms in question contributed to the attainment of the objective of common interest, as defined by the 2011 White Paper on the single European transport area [37], which is modal transfer from the private vehicle to public transport.
Uzimajući u obzir to i specifičnu situaciju u regiji Île-de-France opisanu u uvodnim izjavama 16. i 17., predmetnim se mehanizmima pridonosilo postizanju cilja od zajedničkog interesa koji je određen u Bijeloj knjizi o jedinstvenom europskom prometnom prostoru iz 2011. [37], a riječ je o prijelazu s vozila pojedinačnog prijevoza na sredstva zajedničkog prijevoza.
Without the subsidies, carriers would not have been able to implement those improvements.
Bez tih subvencija prijevoznici ne bi mogli poboljšati usluge.
The subsidised routes were in fact running at a loss and their economic balance already depended on the public-service compensations awarded.
Financirane linije bile su zapravo na gubitku i njihova je gospodarska ravnoteža već ovisila o dodijeljenim naknadama za javne usluge.
The mechanisms in question therefore had an incentive effect.
Iz toga proizlazi da su predmetni mehanizmi imali poticajni učinak.
The Commission notes that the eligible costs and rates for the subsidies were capped, so that only part of the investment costs were taken over directly by the Region and then by STIF.
Komisija zaključuje da su i iznos i stopa subvencija bili ograničeni jer je samo jedan dio troškova ulaganja izravno snosila najprije regija, a zatim STIF.
The maximum subsidy rates reached 50 % for ordinary buses and 60 % for ecological buses, in other words the aid percentages were moderate.
Najviši iznos subvencija dosezao je 50 % za obične autobuse te 60 % za ekološke autobuse, odnosno za potpore srednjeg intenziteta.
What is more, the equipment subsidised, very largely buses, could only be marginally assigned to uses or routes other than those for which the subsidy had primarily been granted.
Tome treba pridodati činjenicu da je subvencionirana oprema, uglavnom autobusi, mogla biti upotrijebljena samo na onim linijama one za koje je subvencija prvotno dodijeljena, a ne na drugim linijama ili u druge svrhe.
Firstly, assignment to uses other than the public passenger service was regulated, or indeed prohibited: under the CT1, and in the regional riders from 1999 onwards, any reassignment was prohibited during the period of write-off of the subsidy; before 1999, that practice was regulated for the first five years.
S jedne strane, upotreba opreme u druge svrhe osim za javni prijevoz putnika ograničena je ili čak zabranjena: u okviru ugovora CT1 te u regionalnim dopunama od 1999. nadalje zabranjena je svaka upotreba opreme u druge svrhe tijekom razdoblja amortizacije subvencije; prije 1999. ta je praksa bila ograničena na prvih pet godina.
Secondly, vehicles intended for urban transport services carrying passengers most of whom are standing do not lend themselves well to occasional transport requiring the use of coaches fitted out for the transport of seated passengers using seat belts.
S druge strane, vozila namijenjena gradskom prijevozu putnika nisu pogodna za povremeni prijevoz za koji su primjereniji turistički autobusi opremljeni za sjedeći prijevoz putnika sa sigurnosnim pojasevima.
Lastly, though the possibility of effects on trade between Member States could not be ruled out, for the reasons described in recitals 226 and 228, the effects were very probably limited because the markets in question were local in scale, and it was contractually or materially difficult, not to say impossible, to reassign the subsidised equipment to other geographical areas (in France or in Europe).
Konačno, iako se ne može isključiti mogućnost utjecaja na trgovinu među državama članicama zbog razloga opisanih u uvodnim izjavama 226. i 228., ona je bila ograničena s obzirom na dimenziju predmetnih tržišta i težinu, odnosno nemogućnost da se ugovorno ili materijalno subvencionirana oprema ponovno financira u drugim zemljopisnim zonama (u Francuskoj ili u Europi).
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that trading conditions were not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest, and that the two mechanisms at issue are compatible with the internal market owing to their conformity with Article 107(3) TFEU.
U svjetlu prethodno navedenoga Komisija zaključuje da nije bilo utjecaja na trgovinske uvjete u mjeri u kojoj bi to bilo suprotno zajedničkom interesu te da su dva predmetna mehanizma spojiva s unutarnjim tržištem jer su u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 3. UFEU-a.
The C2 contribution in the CT2
Doprinos C2 ugovora CT2
The Commission has already concluded in recital 217 that, unlike the subsidies awarded by the Region up to 2008 or by STIF under Rider No 3 to the CT1, the C2 contribution in the CT2 had to be treated as a public-service compensation.
Komisija je već u uvodnoj izjavi 217. zaključila da bi, za razliku od subvencija koje je dodjeljivala regija do 2008. ili STIF na temelju Dopune br. 3. ugovora CT1, doprinos C2 ugovora CT2 trebalo smatrati naknadom za obavljanje javne usluge.
The compatibility of the aid awarded to reimburse the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service is considered by the yardstick of Article 93 TFEU.
Procjena spojivosti s unutarnjim tržištem potpora dodijeljenih kao odšteta za obveze koje su svojstvene konceptu javne usluge provodi se na temelju članka 93. UFEU-a.
Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 provides as follows: ‘Where a competent authority decides to grant the operator of its choice an exclusive right and/or compensation, of whatever nature, in return for the discharge of public-service obligations, it shall do so within the framework of a public-service contract.’
U članku 3. stavku 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 navodi se: „Ako nadležno tijelo odluči dodijeliti isključivo pravo i/ili naknadu bilo kakve naravi operatoru po svom izboru u zamjenu za ispunjavanje obveza obavljanja javne usluge, to čini u okviru ugovora o javnim uslugama”.
STIF, under Decree No 2005-664 of 10 June 2005, is the organising body for scheduled passenger transport services in Île-de-France, which makes it a competent awarding authority for public-service compensation.
STIF je u skladu s dekretom br. 2005-664 od 10. lipnja 2005. subjekt koji organizira redoviti prijevoz putnika u regiji Île-de-France što ga čini nadležnim tijelom za dodjelu naknada za obavljanje javne usluge.
Such compensation, be it component C1 or C2, is awarded in the framework of the CT2, which is a public-service contract.
Njegove naknade, bez obzira na to radi li se o doprinosima C1 ili C2, dodijeljene su na temelju ugovora CT2, odnosno ugovora o javnim uslugama.
The requirements of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 are therefore met.
Promatra se usklađenost s člankom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 sets out the mandatory content of public-service contracts.
U članku 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 definira se obvezan sadržaj ugovora o javnim uslugama:
Under paragraph 1, public-service contracts must:
primjenom stavka 1. navedenog članka ugovorima o javnim uslugama:
clearly define the PSOs with which the public-service operator is to comply, and the geographical areas concerned,
jasno se određuju obveze obavljanja javne usluge kojih se operator javne usluge treba pridržavati, kao i predmetno zemljopisno područje,
establish in advance, in an objective and transparent manner, the parameters on the basis of which the compensation payment is to be calculated, and the nature and extent of any exclusive rights granted, in a way that prevents overcompensation,
unaprijed se utvrđuju, na objektivan i transparentan način, parametri na temelju kojih se izračunava plaćanje naknade te priroda i doseg svih dodijeljenih isključivih prava na način koji onemogućuje prekomjernu naknadu,
determine the arrangements for the allocation of costs connected with the provision of services.
određuju se uvjeti raspodjele troškova povezanih s pružanjem usluga.
Under paragraph 2, public-service contracts must determine the arrangements for the allocation of revenue from the sale of tickets.
Primjenom stavka 2. istog članka ugovorima o javnim uslugama određuju se načini raspoređivanja prihoda od prodaje karata.
Paragraph 3 lays down that the duration of public-service contracts for transport by bus may not exceed 10 years.
U stavku 3. istog članka navodi se da trajanje ugovora o javnim uslugama ne smije prelaziti deset godina za usluge autobusnog prijevoza.
Paragraph 6 states that, where operators are required to comply with quality standards, these standards shall be clearly included in the contract.
U stavku 6. istog članka navodi se da ako su operatorima nametnute obveze usklađenja s određenim standardima kvalitete, ti standardi moraju biti jasno izraženi u ugovoru.
As regards CT2, the Commission finds as follows:
U pogledu ugovora CT2 Komisija zaključuje sljedeće:
The CT2 contract can be described as a public-service contract insofar as, as demonstrated in recitals 214 and 216, it confers responsibility on an operator for the management and operation of the public passenger transport services subject to PSOs.
ugovor CT2 može se smatrati ugovorom o javnim uslugama ako se, kako je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama 214. i 216., operatoru povjerava upravljanje i obavljanje javne usluge putničkog prijevoza koje su obuhvaćene obvezama obavljanja javne usluge.
The contract provides for a C1 contribution and a C2 contribution which are defined, in a transparent and objective manner, in Article 53 of the CT2.
Tim ugovorom predviđa se dodjela doprinosa C1 i C2 koji su na objektivan i transparentan način definirani u članku 53. ugovora CT2.
The existence of a unified financial account for the service means that the costs of providing the services can be allocated in a detailed manner.
Postojanje financijskog izvješća za usluge omogućuje preciznu raspodjelu troškova povezanih s pružanjem usluga.
The requirements of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 are therefore met.
Zaključuje se da postoji usklađenost s člankom 4. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
The mechanisms for allocating the revenue from ticket sales are very precisely described in Article 50 of the CT2.
Mehanizmi raspodjele prihoda povezanih s prodajom prijevoznih karata vrlo su precizno opisani u članku 50. ugovora CT2.
The requirements of Article 4(2) are therefore met.
Time se potvrđuje usklađenost sa stavkom 2. istog članka.
The CT2 includes quality standards which are clearly defined in the contract.
Ugovor CT2 uključuje standarde kvalitete koji jasno definirani u ugovoru.
The requirements of Article 4(6) are therefore met.
Time se potvrđuje usklađenost sa stavkom 6. istog članka.
Lastly, Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 and the annex thereto describe the main principles governing the determination of public-service compensation:
Konačno, u članku 6. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 i u njezinu Prilogu opisuju se glavna načela na temelju kojih se određuje naknada za javne usluge:
method of calculating ‘the net financial effect’ of complying with the PSO on the public-service operator's costs and revenues;
način izračuna „neto financijskog učinka” obveze obavljanja javne usluge u pogledu troškova i prihoda operatora javne usluge;
accounting separation of activities covered by PSOs and those operated commercially;
odvojeni računovodstveni prikaz djelatnosti u okviru obveza obavljanja javne usluge obavljanja i onih u komercijalnom poslovanju;
definition of the ‘reasonable profit’ which can be expected by the operator through payment of public-service compensation;
definicija „razumne dobiti” koju operator može očekivati kroz isplatu naknade za javne usluge;
incentives to maintain or develop effective management capable of providing services of a high standard.
promicanje očuvanja i razvoja učinkovitog upravljanja u cilju pružanja usluga po zadovoljavajuće visokim standardima.
The Commission's scrutiny on this point is confined to contribution C2 in the CT2, as contribution C1 does not fall within the scope of the investigation as defined in the opening decision.
Procjena Komisije u ovoj se točki ograničava na doprinos C1 ugovora CT2 jer doprinos C1 nije obuhvaćen opsegom procjene definiranim u odluci o pokretanju postupka.
It is, nevertheless, necessary to explain the relationship between C1 and C2 in order to be able to rule on contribution C2.
Međutim, potrebno je objasniti povezanost doprinosa C1 i C2 kako bi se mogao donijeti zaključak o doprinosu C2.
The purpose of contribution C1 is to compensate for the operating deficit, calculated as the sum of the operating costs (excluding elements relating to investment, such as depreciation), plus a contractually negotiated margin, and minus all the revenues and operating subsidies.
Cilj doprinosa C1 jest nadoknada deficita poslovanja izračunanog kao zbroj troškova poslovanja (osim elemenata povezanih s ulaganjem, poput amortizacije) uvećanog za ugovorenu maržu i umanjenog za sve prihode i subvencije povezane s obavljanjem usluge.
Contribution C2, in contrast, is calculated as the sum of depreciation and is, therefore, only intended to cover costs incurred by the requirements to invest laid down in the contract.
S druge strane, doprinos C2 računa se kao zbroj amortizacije i pokriva samo troškove nastale obvezama ulaganja definiranima ugovorom.
The method of calculating these two contributions is clearly set out in the CT2 and the annexes thereto, in accordance with recital 256(a).
Metoda izračuna ovih dvaju doprinosa jasno je opisana u ugovoru CT2 i njegovim prilozima, u skladu s točkom (a) uvodne izjave 256.
According to the information supplied by STIF, routes for which there is a CT2 all show an operating deficit (even before costs relating to investment have been taken into account), so that the C1 contribution is always positive [38].
Prema podacima koje je podnio STIF sve linije koje su bile predmet ugovora CT2 imale su deficit u poslovanju (prije uračunavanja troškova ulaganja), dok je doprinos C1 uvijek pozitivan [38].
As the revenue and subsidies relating to operation are not enough to cover even a fraction of the annualised investment costs, contribution C2 is in reality equal to the sum of the depreciations (plus the financial costs) recorded in the unified financial account.
Budući da prihodi i subvencije povezane s obavljanjem usluge nisu dovoljni za pokrivanje čak ni dijela godišnjih troškova ulaganja, doprinos C2 u stvarnosti je jednak iznosu amortizacije (uvećanom za troškove financiranja) navedenom u jedinstvenom financijskom izvješću.
This distinction makes clear that the definition of ‘reasonable profit’, to use the wording of Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, depends entirely on contribution C1 and not on contribution C2.
Iz navedenoga proizlazi da se definicija „razumne dobiti” u skladu s člankom 6. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 u potpunosti odnosi na doprinos C1, a ne na doprinos C2.
Recital 256(c) cannot, therefore, apply to contribution C2 considered in isolation.
Prema tome, točka (c) uvodne izjave 256. ne može se primijeniti na doprinos C2 koji se promatra zasebno.
It can, on the other hand, be established that contribution C2 cannot in any way overcompensate the transport operator, as it only covers investment costs actually recorded and entered as depreciation in the financial account for each route.
Naprotiv, može se ustanoviti da doprinos C2 ni na koji način nije prekomjerna naknada prijevozniku jer pokriva samo troškove ulaganja koji se u financijskom izvješću svake linije smatraju i koji su navedeni kao amortizacija.
As regards recital 256(b), the Commission observes that the existence of this financial account for the service, which is specific to each route for which there is a public-service contract, makes it possible, firstly, to ensure that there is accounting separation from any other activities of the operator and, secondly, to record all the costs and revenue linked to performance of the public service, in line with the principles set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
U pogledu točke (b) uvodne izjave 256. Komisija primjećuje da financijsko izvješće usluga, posebno izrađeno za svaku liniju koja je predmet ugovora o javnim uslugama, s jedne strane omogućuje računovodstveno odvajanje djelatnosti koje ne provodi operator, a s druge strane utvrđivanje svih troškova i prihoda povezanih s pružanjem javne usluge u skladu s načelima navedenima u Prilogu Uredbi (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
Lastly, as regards recital 256(d), Article 49 of the CT2 lays down that ‘besides the remuneration it receives, the undertaking is subject to incentives, bonuses or penalties linked to its [operational] performance in performing the reference service’.
U pogledu točke (d) uvodne izjave 256. ugovor CT2 predviđa člankom 49. da „osim naknade, poduzeće podliježe podjeli dobiti, bonusima ili kaznama povezanima s poslovanjem u pružanju predmetnih usluga”.
The public-service compensation, of which contribution C2 is a part, is therefore combined with a system of incentives developed enough to ensure that Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 is deemed to be complied with.
Naknada za obavljanje javne usluge, u koju pripada i doprinos C2, ostvaruje se kroz sustav inicijativa koji je dovoljno razvijen da bi se smatralo da je u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1370/2007.
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that contribution C2 in the CT2 complies with the main principles defined in Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 with respect to calculating public-service compensation and hence that it can be declared compatible with the internal market under Article 93 TFEU.
U svjetlu prethodno navedenoga Komisija zaključuje da je doprinos C2 ugovora CT2 spojiv s glavnim načelima definiranima Uredbom (EZ) br. 1370/2007 u pogledu izračuna naknada za obavljanje javne usluge te se stoga može smatrati i spojivim s unutarnjim tržištem na temelju članka 93.
This conclusion, which is limited to contribution C2, is without prejudice to the compatibility of the CT2 contributions as a whole (since contribution C1 is not within the scope of application of this Decision).
UFEU-a. Ovaj je zaključak ograničen na doprinos C2 te se ne odnosi na spojivost svih naknada ugovora CT2 (doprinos C1 ne ulazi u područje primjene ove odluke).
The investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region through the successive decisions of 1994, 1998 and 2001 constitute State aid implemented unlawfully, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Subvencije za ulaganja koje je regija Île-de-France dodijelila na temelju uzastopnih odluka iz 1994., 1998. i 2001. smatraju se nezakonito provedenom državnom potporom koja krši članak 108. stavak 3. UFEU-a.
However, in view of its compliance with Article 107(3) TFEU, the Commission declares this aid to be compatible with the internal market.
Međutim, u pogledu njihove usklađenosti s člankom 107. stavkom 3. UFEU-a Komisija izjavljuje da su te potpore spojive s unutarnjim tržištem.
The investment subsidies awarded by STIF under Rider No 3 to CT1 constitute State aid implemented unlawfully, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Subvencije za ulaganja koje je STIF dodijelio na temelju Dopune br. 3 ugovora CT1 smatraju se nezakonito provedenom državnom potporom kojom se krši članak 108. stavak 3. UFEU-a.
The public-service compensation awarded by STIF in the form of contribution C2 under the CT2 constitutes State aid which, as it does not satisfy certain formal criteria laid down by Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, is not covered by the exemption from the notification requirement granted by that Regulation.
Naknade za obavljanje javne usluge koje je STIF dodijelio u obliku doprinosa C1 ugovora CT2 smatraju se državnim potporama koje ne ispunjavaju određene uvjete Uredbe (EZ) br. 1370/2007 te time nisu izuzete od obveze obavještavanja Komisije.
However, in view of its compliance with Article 93 TFEU, the Commission declares this aid to be compatible with the internal market,
Međutim,u pogledu njihove usklađenosti s člankom 93. UFEU-a Komisija izjavljuje da su te potpore spojive s unutarnjim tržištem,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
DONIJELA JE SLJEDEĆU ODLUKU:
The aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 in the form of investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region by way of decisions CR 34-94, CR 44-98 and CR 47-01 is compatible with the internal market.
Program potpora, koji je Francuska nezakonito provodila u razdoblju od 1994. do 2008. u obliku subvencija za ulaganja, koje je regija Île-de-France dodijelila u okviru odluka CR 34-94, CR 44-98 i CR 47-01, spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem.
The aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France from 2008 onwards in the form of investment subsidies awarded by STIF under Rider No 3 to CT1 is compatible with the internal market.
Program potpora, koji je Francuska nezakonito provodila u razdoblju od 2008. u obliku subvencija za ulaganja, koje je STIF dodijelio u okviru Dopune br. 3 ugovora CT1, spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem.
The aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France in the form of C2 contributions awarded by STIF under CT2 is compatible with the internal market.
Program potpora, koji je Francuska nezakonito provodila u obliku doprinosa C2, koje je STIF dodijelio u okviru ugovora CT2, spojiv je s unutarnjim tržištem.
This decision is addressed to the French Republic.
Ova je odluka upućena Francuskoj Republici.
Done at Brussels, 2 February 2017.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu, 2. veljače 2017.
OJ C 141, 9.5.2014, p. 38.
SL C 141, 9.5.2014. str. 38.
Judgment of 6 October 2015 in Case C-303/13P Commission v Jørgen Andersen, ECLI:EU:C:2015:647.
Presuda Suda od 6. listopada 2015., Europska komisija protiv Jørgena Andersena, C-303/13P, ECLI:EU:C:2015:647.
Report by the Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme d'Île-de-France published in March 2013 and accessible on line: www.omnil.fr/IMG/pdf/la_circulation_routiere_en_idf_en_2010.pdf.
Izvješće Instituta za prostorno uređenje i urbanizam regije Île-de-France, objavljeno u ožujku 2013. i dostupno na francuskom jeziku na: www.omnil.fr/IMG/pdf/la_circulation_routiere_en_idf_en_2010.pdf
Decision CR 34-94 of 20 October 1994 on aid for the improvement of public road transport services operated by private undertakings or undertakings under local authority control.
Odluka CR 34-94 regionalnog vijeća regije Île-de-France od 20. listopada 1994. o potpori za poboljšanje usluga javnog cestovnog prijevoza koji obavljaju privatna ili javna poduzeća.
Decision CR 79-21 of 10 July 1979.
Odluka CR 79-21 od 10. srpnja 1979.
Judgment No 0417015/7-1.
Presuda br. 0417015/7-1
Judgment No 08PA04753.
Presuda br. 08PA04753
Judgment No 343440.
Presuda br. 343440
Judgment No 0817138/2-1.
Presuda br. 0817138/2-1
Judgment No 13PPA03174.
Presuda br. 13PA03174
Judgment of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Presuda Suda od 24. srpnja 2003., Altmark Trans GmbH i Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg protiv Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Uredba (EZ) br. 1370/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. listopada 2007. o uslugama javnog željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza putnika i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba Vijeća (EEZ) br. 1191/69 i (EEZ) br. 1107/70 (SL L 315, 3.12.2007., str. 1).
Judgement of 15 June 2000 in Case T-298/97 Alzetta Maura v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2000:151.
Presuda Općeg suda od 15. lipnja 2000., Alzetta Maura protiv Komisije, T-298/97, ECLI:EU:T:2000:151.