natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission considers that the relationship on its own constitutes a breach of the undertaking and that the invoices relating to the indirect sales to this importer were not made and reported in conformity with the undertaking.
Komisija smatra da je ta povezanost sama po sebi kršenje preuzete obveze i da računi koji se odnose na neizravnu prodaju tom uvozniku nisu izrađeni i iskazani u skladu s preuzetom obvezom.
In addition, the Commission notes that the invoices submitted by AE Solar do not prove that the MIP was respected for the above transactions as the resale invoices covered both solar panels and other products.
Nadalje, Komisija primjećuje da računi koje je dostavilo društvo AE Solar ne dokazuju da je u navedenim transakcijama poštovana najniža uvozna cijena zato što računi za preprodaju obuhvaćaju solarne panele i druge proizvode.
Wuxi Saijing submitted that it had never compensated the unrelated importer in the Union and submitted a corresponding global statement by an auditor.
Društvo Wuxi Saijing tvrdilo je da nikada nije kompenziralo nepovezanog uvoznika u Uniji i dostavilo je odgovarajući globalni financijski izvještaj vanjskog revizora.
The Commission cannot accept this global statement which does not contain any further evidence on the lack of compensation to the unrelated importer, in particular to refute the arguments and evidence on the compensation disclosed to Wuxi Saijing.
Komisija ne može prihvatiti taj globalni financijski izvještaj koji ne sadržava nikakve dodatne dokaze o nedostatku naknade nepovezanom uvozniku, posebno kako bi se opovrgnule tvrdnje i dokazi o naknadama koje je objavilo društvo Wuxi Saijing.
The Commission therefore rejects the argument.
Stoga Komisija odbacuje tu tvrdnju.
Both Wuxi Saijing and the unrelated importer in the Union submitted that the products referred to in recital 42 should be classified under CN code ex85414090 and referred to various technical specifications.
Društvo Wuxi Saijing i nepovezani uvoznik u Uniji tvrdili su da se proizvodi iz uvodne izjave 42. trebaju razvrstati u oznaku KN ex85414090 i uputili su na razne tehničke specifikacije.
The Commission rejects this argument as the classification of products is made following an importer's declaration and lies with the responsibility of national customs authorities who had classified the products under CN code ex85013100.
Komisija odbacuje tu tvrdnju jer se razvrstavanje obavlja na temelju deklaracije uvoznika i u nadležnosti je nacionalnih carinskih tijela koje su te proizvede razvrstale u oznaku KN ex85013100.
Any disagreement on the classification of the product should, accordingly, be addressed to the national customs authorities directly.
Prema tome, sva neslaganja u pogledu razvrstavanja proizvoda trebalo bi uputiti izravno nacionalnim carinskim tijelima.
Wuxi Saijing's unrelated importer requested access to confidential information which had been disclosed to Wuxi Saijing.
Nepovezani uvoznik društva Wuxi Saijing zatražio je pristup povjerljivim podacima koje su otkrivene društvu Wuxi Saijing.
The Commission rejects this request for disclosure as the unrelated importer is not party to the undertaking and because the disclosure contains confidential business information of Wuxi Saijing.
Komisija odbacuje taj zahtjev za pristup podacima jer nepovezani uvoznik ne sudjeluje u preuzetoj obvezi i zato što ti podaci sadržavaju povjerljive poslovne informacije društva Wuxi Saijing.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for AE Solar and Wuxi Saijing should be withdrawn.
Stoga, u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 9. Osnovne antidampinške uredbe, člankom 13. stavkom 9. Osnovne antisubvencijske uredbe te u skladu s uvjetima preuzete obveze, Komisija je zaključila da bi trebalo povući prihvaćanje preuzete obveze za društva AE Solar i Wuxi Saijing.
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 and maintained by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by AE Solar and Wuxi Saijing as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
Sukladno tomu, u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 9. Osnovne antidampinške uredbe i člankom 13. stavkom 9. Osnovne antisubvencijske uredbe, konačna antidampinška pristojba uvedena člankom 1. Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367 i konačna kompenzacijska pristojba uvedena člankom 1. Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1239/2013 i zadržana na snazi člankom 1. Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366 automatski se primjenjuju na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom ili poslanoga iz NRK-a, koji su proizvela društva AE Solar i Wuxi Saijing, od dana stupanja na snagu ove Uredbe.
The Commission also recalls that where the customs authorities of the Member States have indications that the price presented on an undertaking invoice does not correspond to the price actually paid, they should investigate whether the requirement to include any rebates in the undertaking invoices has been violated or the MIP has not been respected.
Komisija osim toga podsjeća da bi carinska tijela država članica koja imaju naznaka da cijena iskazana na računu izdanom na temelju preuzete obveze ne odgovara stvarno plaćenoj cijeni trebala ispitati je li prekršena obveza o navođenju rabata na računima izdanima na temelju preuzete obveze i je li primijenjena najniža uvozna cijena.
Name of the company
Ime trgovačkog društva
Such information may under no circumstances be disclosed to third parties.
Te se informacije nipošto ne smiju otkriti trećim osobama.
Done at Brussels, 5 September 2017.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 5. rujna 2017.
OJ L 218, 24.8.2017, p. 10.
SL L 218, 24.8.2017., str. 10.
OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558.
SL L 343, 29.12.2015., str. 558.
List of undertaking invoices issued by Alternative Energy (AE) Solar Co. Ltd, which are declared invalid:
Popis računa na temelju preuzete obveze, koje je izdalo društvo Alternative Energy (AE) Solar Co. Ltd, a proglašavaju se nevaljanima:
List of undertaking invoices issued by Wuxi Saijing Solar Co. Ltd, which are declared invalid:
Popis računa na temelju preuzete obveze, koje je izdalo društvo Wuxi Saijing Solar Co. Ltd, a proglašavaju se nevaljanima:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1526
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1526
of 6 September 2017
оd 6. rujna 2017.
concerning the non-approval of the active substance beta-cypermethrin in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market
o neodobravanju aktivne tvari beta-cipermetrin u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the United Kingdom received an application from Cerexagri SAS on 13 November 2009 for the inclusion of the active substance beta-cypermethrin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
U skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 2. Direktive 91/414/EEZ Ujedinjena Kraljevina je 13. studenoga 2009. od društva Cerexagri SAS zaprimila zahtjev za uvrštenje aktivne tvari beta-cipermetrin u Prilog I. Direktivi 91/414/EEZ.
Implementing Decision 2011/266/EU confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Provedbenom odlukom 2011/266/EU potvrđeno je da je dokumentacija „cjelovita” te se može smatrati da u načelu ispunjava zahtjeve u pogledu podataka i informacija iz priloga II. i III. Direktivi 91/414/EEZ.
For that active substance, the assessment of the effects on human and animal health and the environment for the uses proposed by the applicant has been carried out in accordance with the procedure provided in Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Za tu je aktivnu tvar provedena ocjena učinaka na zdravlje ljudi i životinja te na okoliš za uporabu koju je predložio podnositelj zahtjeva u skladu s postupkom predviđenim u članku 6. stavcima 2. i 4. Direktive 91/414/EEZ.
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 4 April 2013.
Imenovana država članica izvjestiteljica dostavila je 4. travnja 2013. nacrt izvješća o ocjeni.
The draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’).
Nacrt izvješća o ocjeni pregledale su države članice i Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”).
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta-cypermethrin [4] on 27 May 2014.
Agencija je 27. svibnja 2014. Komisiji dostavila svoj zaključak o procjeni rizika od pesticida za aktivnu tvar beta-cipermetrin [4].
The Authority concluded that for the uses of beta-cypermethrin assessed there is a high risk to aquatic organisms, bees and non-target arthropods.
Agencija je zaključila da za ocijenjenu uporabu beta-cipermetrina postoji visok rizik za vodene organizme, pčele i neciljane člankonošce.
In addition, the risk assessment for soil and aquatic organisms and the exposure assessment for groundwater could not be finalised as insufficient information was provided in relation to the fate and behaviour of the cyclopropyl ring moiety of beta-cypermethrin.
Osim toga, procjena rizika za organizme koji žive u tlu i vodene organizme te ocjena izloženosti podzemnih voda nije se mogla dovršiti jer nije dostavljeno dovoljno informacija o zadržavanju i ponašanju ciklopropilne skupine prstena beta-cipermetrina.
Furthermore, information on metabolism in livestock, which is necessary to confirm the residue definition for animal products, and information on the toxicity profile of metabolite PBA and its relevance for consumer risk assessment, were not provided.
Nadalje, nisu dostavljene informacije o metabolizmu stoke, koje su potrebne da bi se potvrdila definicija ostatka za proizvode životinjskog podrijetla, niti informacije o toksičnosti metabolita PBA i njegovoj važnosti za procjenu rizika za potrošače.
Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that beta-cypermethrin meets the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Stoga na temelju raspoloživih informacija nije bilo moguće utvrditi da beta-cipermetrin ispunjava kriterije za uvrštenje u Prilog I. Direktivi 91/414/EEZ.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 188/2011 [5], the Commission invited the applicant to submit comments on the draft review report.
Nadalje, u skladu s člankom 9. Uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 188/2011 [5] Komisija je pozvala podnositelja zahtjeva da podnese primjedbe na nacrt izvješća o pregledu.
Despite the arguments put forward by the applicant, the concerns referred to in recital 4 could not be eliminated.
Unatoč argumentima koje je iznio podnositelj zahtjeva, bojazni u pogledu tvari iz uvodne izjave 4. nisu se mogle ukloniti.
Consequently, it has not been demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing beta-cypermethrin satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dakle, nije dokazano da se može očekivati da, u predloženim uvjetima uporabe, sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju beta-cipermetrin u načelu ispunjavaju zahtjeve iz članka 5. stavka 1. točaka (a) i (b) Direktive 91/414/EEZ.
Beta-cypermethrin should therefore not be approved in accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Beta-cipermetrin stoga ne bi trebalo odobriti u skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
This Regulation does not prevent the applicant from submitting a further application for beta-cypermethrin in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Ovom se Uredbom podnositelja zahtjeva ne sprječava da ponovno podnese zahtjev za beta-cipermetrin u skladu s člankom 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
The active substance beta-cypermethrin is not approved.
Aktivna tvar beta-cipermetrin ne odobrava se.
Commission Implementing Decision 2011/266/EU of 2 May 2011 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of beta-cypermethrin, eugenol, geraniol and thymol in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 114, 4.5.2011, p. 3).
Provedbena odluka Komisije 2011/266/EU od 2. svibnja 2011. o načelnom priznavanju cjelovitosti dokumentacije dostavljene na detaljno razmatranje s ciljem mogućeg uvrštenja beta-cipermetrina, eugenola, geraniola i timola u Prilog I. Direktivi Vijeća 91/414/EEZ (SL L 114, 4.5.2011., str. 3.).
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014, Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta-cypermethrin.
EFSA (Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane), 2014., Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od pesticida s aktivnom tvari beta-cipermetrin.
EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3717, 90 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3717.
EFSA Journal 2014.; 12(6):3717, 90 str. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3717.
For beta-cypermethrin the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Implementing Decision 2011/266/EU [3].
Provedbenom odlukom Komisije 2011/266/EU potvrđeno je da beta-cipermetrin ispunjava uvjete iz članka 80. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 [3].
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1527
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1527
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances cyflufenamid, fluopicolide, heptamaloxyloglucan and malathion
o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 540/2011 u pogledu produljenja roka valjanosti odobrenja aktivnih tvari ciflufenamid, fluopikolid, heptamaloksiloglukan i malation
Applications for the renewal of the approval of the active substances included in this Regulation were submitted in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 [3].
Zahtjevi za produljenje odobrenja aktivnih tvari obuhvaćenih ovom Uredbom podneseni su u skladu s Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 844/2012 [3].
However, the approval of those substances may expire for reasons beyond the control of the applicant before a decision has been taken on the renewal of their approval.
Međutim, iz razloga koji su izvan kontrole podnositelja zahtjeva, odobrenje za te tvari može isteći prije donošenja odluke o produljenju odobrenja tih tvari.
In view of the time and resources necessary for completing the assessment of applications for the renewal of approvals of the large number of active substances the approvals of which are expiring between 2019 and 2021, Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 6104 [4] established a work programme grouping together similar active substances and setting priorities on the basis of safety concerns for human and animal health or the environment as provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
S obzirom na vrijeme i sredstva potrebna za dovršenje procjene zahtjevâ za produljenje odobrenja velikog broja aktivnih tvari za koje odobrenja istječu između 2019. i 2021., Provedbenom odlukom Komisije C(2016) 6104 [4] utvrđen je program rada u kojemu se grupiraju slične aktivne tvari i određuju prioriteti na temelju pitanjâ sigurnosti za zdravlje ljudi i životinja ili za okoliš, kako je predviđeno člankom 18. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
The presumed low risk substances should be prioritised in accordance with Implementing Decision C(2016) 6104.
Tvarima za koje se smatra da su manjeg rizika treba dati prioritet u skladu s Provedbenom odlukom C(2016) 6104.
Taking into account the distribution of responsibilities and work among Member States acting as rapporteurs and co-rapporteurs and the available resources necessary for assessment and decision-making, that period should be of one year for the active substance heptamaloxyloglucan.
Uzimajući u obzir raspodjelu odgovornosti i rada među državama članicama koje djeluju kao izvjestiteljice i suizvjestiteljice te dostupne resurse potrebne za procjenu i donošenje odluke, to bi razdoblje za aktivnu tvar heptamaloksiloglukan trebalo trajati jednu godinu.
For active substances which do not fall in the prioritised categories in Implementing Decision C(2016)6104, the approval period should be extended by either two or three years, taking into account the current date of expiry, the fact that in accordance with Article 6(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 the supplementary dossier for an active substance is to be submitted no later than 30 months before expiry of the approval, the need to ensure a balanced distribution of responsibilities and work among Member States acting as rapporteurs and co-rapporteurs and the available resources necessary for assessment and decision-making.
Za aktivne tvari koje nisu obuhvaćene prioritetnim kategorijama u Provedbenoj odluci C(2016) 6104 rok valjanosti odobrenja trebalo bi produljiti za dvije ili tri godine, uzimajući u obzir postojeći datum prestanka odobrenja, činjenicu da se u skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 3. Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 844/2012 treba dostaviti dopunsku dokumentaciju za aktivnu tvar najkasnije 30 mjeseci prije isteka odobrenja, potrebu da se osigura ujednačena raspodjela odgovornosti i rada među državama članicama koje djeluju kao izvjestiteljice i suizvjestiteljice te raspoložive resurse potrebne za procjenu i donošenje odluke.
It is therefore appropriate to extend the approval period for active substance malathion by two years, and to extend the approval periods of active substances cyflufenamid and fluopicolide by three years.
Stoga je primjereno produljiti rok valjanosti odobrenja aktivne tvari malation za dvije godine te rok valjanosti odobrenja aktivnih tvari ciflufenamid i fluopikolid za tri godine.
In view of the aim of the first paragraph of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as regards cases where no supplementary dossier in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 is submitted no later than 30 months before the respective expiry date laid down in the Annex to this Regulation, the Commission will set the expiry date at the same date as before this Regulation or at the earliest date thereafter.
S obzirom na cilj članka 17. prvog stavka Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009, ako se dopunska dokumentacija ne dostavi u skladu s Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 844/2012 najkasnije 30 mjeseci prije datuma prestanka odobrenja utvrđenog u Prilogu toj uredbi, Komisija će kao datum prestanka odobrenja odrediti isti datum koji je vrijedio prije donošenja ove Uredbe ili najraniji mogući datum nakon tog datuma.
In view of the aim of the first paragraph of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as regards cases where the Commission will adopt a Regulation providing that the approval of an active substance referred to in the Annex to this Regulation is not renewed because the approval criteria are not satisfied, the Commission will set the expiry date at the same date as before this Regulation or at the date of the entry into force of the Regulation providing that the approval of the active substance is not renewed, whichever date is later.
S obzirom na cilj članka 17. prvog stavka Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 ako Komisija donese uredbu kojom se predviđa da se odobrenje aktivne tvari iz Priloga ovoj Uredbi ne produljuje jer nisu ispunjena mjerila za odobravanje, Komisija će kao datum isteka odrediti isti datum koji je vrijedio prije donošenja ove Uredbe ili datum stupanja na snagu uredbe kojom se predviđa da se odobrenje aktivne tvari ne produljuje, ovisno o tome koji je datum kasniji.
As regards cases where the Commission will adopt a Regulation providing for the renewal of an active substance referred to in the Annex to this Regulation, the Commission will endeavour to set, as appropriate under the circumstances, the earliest possible application date.
Ako Komisija donese uredbu kojom se predviđa produljenje odobrenja aktivne tvari iz Priloga ovoj Uredbi, Komisija će nastojati, u skladu s okolnostima, odrediti najraniji mogući datum primjene.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 540/2011 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti,
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 296, Cyflufenamid, the date is replaced by ‘31 March 2023’;
u šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 296., ciflufenamid, datum se zamjenjuje datumom „31. ožujka 2023.”;
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 297, Fluopicolide, the date is replaced by ‘31 May 2023’;
u šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 297., fluopikolid, datum se zamjenjuje datumom „31. svibnja 2023.”;
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 298, Heptamaloxyloglucan, the date is replaced by ‘31 May 2021’;
u šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 298., heptamaloksiloglukan, datum se zamjenjuje datumom „31. svibnja 2021.”;
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 300, Malathion, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2022’.
u šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 300., malation, datum se zamjenjuje datumom „30. travnja 2022.”.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1529
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1529
approving the basic substance sodium chloride in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobravanju osnovne tvari natrijev klorid u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja te o izmjeni Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi Komisije (EU) br. 540/2011
In accordance with Article 23(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the Commission received on 7 June 2016 an application from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (UK) and the Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB) for the approval of salt as a basic substance for use as a fungicide in mushrooms.
U skladu s člankom 23. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Komisija je 7. lipnja 2016. od subjekata Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (UK) i Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB) primila zahtjev za odobrenje soli kao osnovne tvari za uporabu kao fungicid na gljivama.
In addition, the Commission received on 21 July 2016 an application from ITAB for the approval of sea salt as basic substance for use as a fungicide and insecticide in grapes.
Uz to, Komisija je 21. srpnja 2016. od ITAB-a primila zahtjev za odobrenje morske soli kao osnovne tvari za uporabu kao fungicid i insekticid na grožđu.
Since both applications concern the substance sodium chloride of food-grade quality, the applications were merged.
Budući da se oba zahtjeva odnose na tvar natrijev klorid prehrambene kvalitete, zahtjevi su objedinjeni.
The applications were accompanied by the information required by the second subparagraph of Article 23(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Uz navedene zahtjeve priložene su tražene informacije iz članka 23. stavka 3. drugog podstavka Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
The Authority presented to the Commission a Technical Report on sodium chloride on 20 January 2017 [2].
Agencija je 20. siječnja 2017. Komisiji dostavila tehničko izvješće o natrijevu kloridu [2].