natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The assumption of a 75 % load factor seems reasonable as it corresponds to the traffic carried during the previous period and as the correspondence exchanged between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002 did not provide for any additional marketing activities, on the part of Ryanair or the CCI, that were likely to significantly increase traffic.
Pretpostavka o faktoru iskorištenosti od 75 % čini se razumnom jer odgovara prometu ostvarenom tijekom prethodnog razdoblja i zato što ni Ryanair ni komora CCI nisu dopisima od kraja 2001. do početka 2002. predvidjeli dodatne marketinške radnje kojima bi se moglo znatno povećati promet.
This additional traffic as a result of the second daily flight during the 2002 summer season is the only incremental traffic associated with the correspondence exchanged between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002, since this correspondence did not amend, except for the 2002 summer season, the daily flight frequency stipulated in the agreement of 11 April 2000 for the Nîmes-London route.
Taj dodatni promet koji odgovara drugom letu u ljetnoj sezoni 2002. jedini je inkrementalni promet povezan s dopisima od kraja 2001. do početka 2002. jer njima nije predviđena izmjena, osim tijekom ljetne sezone 2002., svakodnevnog leta predviđenog Ugovorom od 11. travnja 2000. za liniju Nîmes – London.
The Commission has therefore included this incremental traffic in its analysis, together with the associated incremental revenues and incremental operating costs, according to the principles set out above.
Komisija je stoga u skladu s prethodno navedenim načelima svojom analizom obuhvatila taj inkrementalni promet te s njim povezane inkrementalne prihode i inkrementalne operativne troškove.
Table 7 in this recital gives the results of this analysis.
U tablici 7. iz ove uvodne izjave navedeni su rezultati te analize.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the correspondence exchanged between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti iz dopisa od kraja 2001. do početka 2002.
Correspondence exchanged in 2004
Dopisi iz 2004.
The terms of the agreement of 11 April 2000 were amended once again, but this time for a more limited period, by the exchanges of letters and emails of 10 and 16 March 2004 (‘the correspondence exchanged in 2004’).
Uvjeti Ugovora od 11. travnja 2000. ponovno su izmijenjeni dopisima i elektroničkom poštom od 10. i 16. ožujka 2004. („dopisi iz 2004.”), ali ovaj puta na kraće razdoblje.
It is apparent from this correspondence and from the explanations provided by France in this respect that this correspondence amended the agreement of 11 April 2000 by increasing the marketing payments by EUR […] per outbound passenger during the period from 29 April to 31 October 2004 (‘the 2004 summer season’), provided that Ryanair added an additional daily flight to its London route during this period.
Iz tih dopisa i obrazloženja Francuske o njima proizlazi da su ti dopisi doveli do izmjene Ugovora od 11. travnja 2000. povećanjem plaćanja za marketing od […] EUR po putniku u odlasku tijekom razdoblja od 29. travnja do 31. listopada 2004. („ljetna sezona 2004.”) pod uvjetom da Ryanair tijekom tog razdoblja uvede dodatan dnevni let na liniji prema Londonu.
According to France, this second flight meant a possible 185 additional flights during the 2004 summer season, which, based on an aircraft configured for 148 passengers and a load factor of 75 %, could have led to additional traffic totalling 41070 passengers.
Prema mišljenju Francuske, taj dodatni drugi let podrazumijeva 185 mogućih dodatnih letova tijekom ljetne sezone 2004., što bi na temelju zrakoplova sa 148 sjedala i stope popunjenosti od 75 %, moglo dovesti do dodatnog prometa koji je procijenjen na 41070 putnika.
The assumption of a 75 % load factor proposed by France seems reasonable as the correspondence exchanged in 2004 did not provide for any additional marketing activities, on the part of Ryanair or the CCI, that were likely to significantly increase traffic in relation to the traffic carried previously.
Pretpostavka o faktoru iskorištenosti od 75 % koji je predložila Francuska čini se razumnom zato što ni Ryanair ni komora CCI nisu dopisima iz 2004. predvidjeli dodatne marketinške radnje kojima bi se moglo znatno povećati promet u odnosu na prethodno ostvaren promet.
With regard to the incremental marketing costs, the Commission has included, in its analysis, the exceptional increase stipulated for the 2004 summer season for all passengers (and not just those corresponding to the additional daily flight).
U pogledu inkrementalnih marketinških troškova, Komisija je svojom analizom obuhvatila jednokratno povećanje predviđeno za ljetnu sezonu 2004. u pogledu svih putnika (a ne samo onih koji lete dodatnim letom).
Table 8 in this recital gives the results of this analysis.
U tablici 8. iz ove uvodne izjave navedeni su rezultati te analize.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the correspondence exchanged in 2004
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti iz dopisa iz 2004.
2005 agreements
Ugovori iz 2005.
Through the airport services agreement of 10 October 2005 and the marketing services agreement signed on the same date (‘the 2005 agreements’), Ryanair undertook to operate:
Ugovorom o uslugama zračne luke od 10. listopada 2005. i Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama koji su sklopljeni istoga dana („Ugovori iz 2005.”) Ryanair se obvezao da će upravljati:
a daily route to London, to which a second daily service was to be added for six months during the 2005 summer season,
svakodnevnom linijom prema Londonu uz koju je u ljetnoj sezoni 2005. trebala tijekom šest mjeseci biti dodana još jedna svakodnevna linija,
a route to Liverpool four times a week,
linija prema Liverpoolu s četiri leta tjedno,
from the end of March 2006, a third route, whose launch was to be announced before the end of 2005, accounting for at least [0-50000] outbound passengers per year,
trećom linijom od kraja ožujka 2006., čije je otvaranje trebalo biti najavljeno prije kraja 2005., s najmanje [0 – 50000] putnika u odlasku godišnje,
from the end of April 2006, a fourth route, whose launch was to be announced before the end of 2005, accounting for at least [0-50000] outbound passengers per year.
četvrtom linijom od kraja travnja 2006., čije je otvaranje trebalo biti najavljeno prije kraja 2005., s najmanje [0 – 50000] putnika u odlasku godišnje.
These agreements replaced the agreement of 11 April 2000, which was therefore terminated before the end of its initial term, with totally different contractual conditions being established.
Tim je Ugovorima zamijenjen Ugovor od 11. travnja 2000., koji je tako raskinut prije prvotno predviđenog isteka te su uspostavljeni sasvim drukčiji ugovorni uvjeti.
The preamble to the 2005 airport services agreement stated that Ryanair, after having conducted ‘a prudent experimental operation’ of a daily route to London, planned to permanently establish itself at Nîmes and increase the number of routes from that airport ‘provided that both technical and financial conditions proposed by FNI were acceptable, so as to make the operation of the routes viable’ (bold added).
U preambuli Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke iz 2005. navedeno je da je Ryanair, nakon što „oprezno eksperimentalno upravljao” svakodnevnom linijom prema Londonu, odlučuje uspostaviti trajno poslovanje u Nîmesu te povećati broj linija s polaskom iz te Zračne luke „ako tehnički i financijski uvjeti koje predloži [komora CCI] budu prihvatljivi kako bi upravljanje linijama bilo održivo” (dodano isticanje masnim slovima).
This passage suggests that, if the CCI had not accepted the terms of the 2005 agreements, Ryanair would have threatened to cease all its operations at Nîmes airport, on the grounds that operating the route to London was not economically viable.
Iz ovog se odlomka naslućuje da u slučaju da komora CCI nije prihvatila uvjete Ugovora iz 2005., Ryanair bi joj zaprijetio okončanjem svih svojih djelatnosti s polaskom iz Zračne luke Nîmes pod izlikom da upravljanje linijom prema Londonu nije gospodarski održivo.
A prudent MEO would undoubtedly have taken this threat seriously, particularly as the April 2000 agreement did not contain any clear and irrevocable undertaking on the part of Ryanair to operate the route to London for the 10 years provided for by the agreement.
Oprezan subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu tu bi prijetnju nesumnjivo shvatio ozbiljno, tim više što Ugovor iz travnja 2000. nije sadržavao jasnu i neopozivu obvezu društva Ryanair da upravlja linijom prema Londonu tijekom deset godina predviđenih Ugovorom.
As a result, a prudent MEO acting in place of the CCI would have in all likelihood considered that, if it did not sign the agreements in question, Ryanair would cease all its operations at Nîmes airport.
Stoga bi oprezan subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji bi djelovao umjesto komore CCI vjerojatno procijenio da bi Ryanair okončao sve svoje djelatnosti u Zračnoj luci Nîmes ako subjekt ne bi sklopio predmetne ugovore.
The incremental traffic associated with the 2005 agreements therefore corresponds to the traffic expected for all the routes and frequencies mentioned in these agreements.
Stoga inkrementalni promet povezan s Ugovorima iz 2005. odgovara očekivanom prometu na svim linijama i broju letova iz tih Ugovora.
For each of these routes and for the reasons set out above, particularly in the light of the marketing services offered by Ryanair, an 85 % load factor has been used.
Iz prethodno navedenih razloga i osobito s obzirom na marketinške usluge koje nudi društvo Ryanair, za svaku od tih linija odabran je faktor iskorištenosti od 85 %.
As the frequencies of the third and fourth routes were not known at the time when the agreements were signed, the Commission has determined these from the minimum passenger numbers to which Ryanair committed in the 2005 agreements, in order to reconstruct the assumptions that would have been used by a prudent MEO.
Budući da tijekom sklapanja Ugovora nije bio poznat broj letova na trećoj i četvrtoj liniji, Komisija ih je odredila razmjerno najmanjem broju putnika na koji se Ryanair obvezao Ugovorima iz 2005. kako bi rekonstruirala pretpostavke na koje bi se oslonio oprezan subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
The Commission has therefore included this incremental traffic in its analysis, together with the associated incremental costs and revenues, according to the principles set out above.
Komisija je stoga u skladu s prethodno navedenim načelima svojom analizom obuhvatila taj inkrementalni promet te s njim povezane inkrementalne prihode i troškove.
It has also included the cost of the financial ‘incentives’ provided for in Article 8 of the airport services agreement of 10 October 2005, namely a payment by the CCI to Ryanair of EUR […] per outbound passenger and EUR […] per rotation.
Analizom je obuhvatila i trošak financijskih „poticaja” predviđenih u članku 8. Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 10. listopada 2005., odnosno plaćanje komore CCI društvu Ryanair u iznosu od […] EUR po putniku u odlasku i […] EUR po povratnom letu.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the agreements of 10 October 2005
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti Ugovora od 10. listopada 2005.
[200000-250000]
[200000 – 250000]
[250000-300000]
[250000 – 300000]
[300000-350000]
[300000 – 350000]
[750-800]
[750 – 800]
[800-850]
[800 – 850]
[850-900]
[850 – 900]
[900-950]
[900 – 950]
financial incentives
financijski poticaji
Amendment of 30 January 2006
Izmjena od 30. siječnja 2006.
It is clear from reading the amendment of 30 January 2006 and from France’s explanations that this amendment simply confirmed that the 2005 agreements (which were not due to expire until the end of 2009) would remain in force until the CCI stopped operating Nîmes airport.
Iz izmjene od 30. siječnja 2006. i obrazloženja Francuske proizlazi da je tom izmjenom samo potvrđeno zadržavanje na snazi Ugovora iz 2005. (koji su trebali isteći tek krajem 2009.) dok komora CCI ne prestane upravljati Zračnom lukom Nîmes.
Amendment of 17 October 2006
Izmjena od 17. listopada 2006.
It is clear from reading the amendment of 17 October 2006 and from France’s explanations that this amendment reduced the volume of marketing services provided for 2006 due to the CCI being unable to supply the marketing materials to be included on the Ryanair website and due to the provision of the marketing services being suspended for nearly six months.
Iz izmjene od 17. listopada 2006. i obrazloženja Francuske proizlazi da je tom izmjenom smanjen obujam marketinških usluga pruženih 2006. jer komora CCI nije mogla dostaviti marketinški sadržaj koji je trebalo postaviti na web-mjesto društva Ryanair i zbog obustave pružanja marketinških usluga tijekom gotovo šest mjeseci.
This situation was due to the fact that the CCI was unable to supply the texts to be included on the Ryanair website.
Do toga je došlo jer komora CCI nije mogla dostaviti tekstove koji su trebali biti postavljeni na web-mjesto društva Ryanair.
These marketing services were therefore delayed and were provided during the second half of 2006, which led to the cost of the services for 2006 being reduced.
Stoga su te marketinške usluge kasnile te su pružene u drugoj polovini 2006. zbog čega je smanjen iznos usluga za 2006.
In so far as the delay in question was attributable to the CCI and as it nevertheless obtained from AMS a reduction in the marketing payments resulting from their 2005 agreement, the CCI acted on this occasion as a prudent MEO.
Budući da je predmetno kašnjenje pripisivo komori CCI i da joj je društvo AMS svejedno smanjilo plaćanja za marketing koja proizlaze iz njihova Ugovora iz 2005., komora CCI se tom prilikom ponijela kao oprezan subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
The amendment of 17 October 2006 did not therefore confer any economic advantage on Ryanair and does not therefore constitute State aid.
Stoga izmjenom od 17. listopada 2006. društvu Ryanair nije dodijeljena gospodarska prednost pa ona ne predstavlja državnu potporu.
Agreements of 2 January 2007
Ugovori od 2. siječnja 2007.
The airport services agreement of 2 January 2007 and the marketing services agreement signed on the same date (‘the agreements of 2 January 2007’) were the first agreements to be signed between VTAN and Ryanair/AMS.
Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke od 2. siječnja 2007. i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen istoga dana („Ugovori od 2. siječnja 2007.”) prvi su koje je VTAN sklopio s društvom Ryanair/AMS.
In the absence of these agreements, Ryanair would have been free to cease all its operations at Nîmes.
Ryanair bi bez tih Ugovora mogao slobodno prekinuti sve djelatnosti u Nîmesu.
The incremental traffic associated with the agreements of 2 January 2007 therefore corresponds to the traffic expected for all the routes and frequencies mentioned in these agreements, namely for the period from 2 January to 31 October 2007:
Stoga inkrementalni promet povezan s Ugovorima od 2. siječnja 2007. odgovara očekivanom prometu na svim linijama i letovima navedenima u tim Ugovorima, odnosno u razdoblju od 2. siječnja do 31. listopada 2007.:
a daily route to London,
svakodnevna linija prema Londonu,
a route to Charleroi four times a week,
linija prema Charleroiju s četiri leta tjedno,
a route to East Midlands three times a week.
linija prema East Midlandsu s tri leta tjedno.
Using a load factor of 85 % for the reasons given previously, the Commission has included this incremental traffic in its analysis, together with the associated incremental costs and revenues, according to the principles set out above.
Primjenom, iz prethodno navedenih razloga, faktora iskorištenosti od 85 % Komisija je u skladu s prethodno navedenim načelima svojom analizom obuhvatila taj inkrementalni promet te s njim povezane inkrementalne prihode i troškove.
It has also included the cost of the financial ‘incentives’ provided for in Article 8 of the airport services agreement of 2 January 2007, namely a payment by VTAN to Ryanair per outbound passenger, which increased in stages according to the number of passengers.
Analizom je obuhvatila i trošak nastao financijskim „poticajima” predviđenima u članku 8. Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 2. siječnja 2007., odnosno plaćanje društva VTAN društvu Ryanair po putniku u odlasku koje se povećava po razredima u skladu s brojem putnika.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the agreements of 2 January 2007
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti iz Ugovora od 2. siječnja 2007.
[700000-750000]
[700000 – 750000]
Amendment of 1 August 2007
Izmjena od 1. kolovoza 2007.
The incremental traffic associated with the amendment of 1 August 2007 therefore corresponds to the traffic on these four flights a week during the period in question, which would have been ‘lost’ in the counterfactual situation.
Stoga inkrementalni promet povezan s izmjenom od 1. kolovoza 2007. odgovara prometu tih četiriju letova tjedno tijekom predmetnog razdoblja, koji bi u slučaju da ih nema bili „izgubljeni”.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the amendment of 1 August 2007
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti izmjene od 1. kolovoza 2007.
2007-2008 winter season
zimska sezona 2007.
[100-150]
[100 – 150]
Agreements of 1 November 2007
Ugovori od 1. studenoga 2007.
The airport services agreement and the marketing services agreement signed for one year on 1 November 2007 (‘the agreements of 1 November 2007’) replaced the agreements of 2 January 2007 that were due to expire.
Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljeni 1. studenoga 2007. na jednu godinu („Ugovori od 1. studenoga 2007.”) uslijedili su nakon Ugovora od 2. siječnja 2007. koji su istekli.
In the absence of these agreements, Ryanair could have ceased all its operations at Nîmes.
Ryanair bi bez tih Ugovora mogao prekinuti sve djelatnosti u Nîmesu.
As a result, the incremental traffic associated with these agreements corresponds to all the routes and frequencies mentioned in these agreements, namely:
Stoga inkrementalni promet povezan s tim Ugovorima odgovara svim linijama i letovima navedenima u tim Ugovorima:
a daily route to London during the summer season and four times a week during the winter season,
svakodnevna linija prema Londonu tijekom ljetne sezone i četiri leta tjedno tijekom zimske sezone,
a route to Liverpool four times a week during the summer season and twice a week during the winter season,
linija prema Liverpoolu s četiri leta tjedno tijekom ljetne sezone i dva leta tjedno tijekom zimske sezone,
a route to Charleroi four times a week throughout the year,a route to East Midlands twice a week during the summer season.
linija prema Charleroiu s četiri leta tjedno tijekom cijele godine,linija prema East Midlandsu s dva leta tjedno tijekom ljetne sezone.
It has also included the cost of the aforementioned financial ‘incentives’ provided for in Article 8 of the airport services agreement of 1 November 2007, namely a payment by VTAN to Ryanair per outbound passenger, which increased in stages according to the number of passengers.
Analizom je obuhvatila i trošak nastao prethodno navedenim financijskim „poticajima” predviđenima u članku 8. Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 1. studenoga 2007., odnosno plaćanje društva VTAN društvu Ryanair po putniku u odlasku koje se povećava po razredima u skladu s brojem putnika.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the agreements of 1 November 2007
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti Ugovora od 1. studenoga 2007.
winter 2007-2008
zima 2007. – 2008.
summer 2008
ljeto 2008.
[250-300]
[250 – 300]
[400-450]
[400 – 450]
[800000-850000]
[800000 – 850000]
Table 12 in the above recital shows that an MEO would have expected negative incremental flows.
Tablicom 12. iz prethodne uvodne izjave pokazano je da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao negativne inkrementalne tokove.
Consequently, the agreements of 1 November 2007 conferred an economic advantage on Ryanair/AMS.
Prema tome, Ugovorima od 1. studenoga 2007. društvu Ryanair/AMS dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost.
Agreements of 27 August 2008
Ugovori od 27. kolovoza 2008.
The airport services agreement and the marketing services agreement signed for one year on 27 August 2008 and applicable from 1 November 2008 (‘the agreements of 27 August 2008’) replaced the agreements of 1 November 2007 that were due to expire.
Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljeni 27. kolovoza 2008. na jednu godinu, a koji su stupili na snagu 1. studenoga 2008. („Ugovori od 27. kolovoza 2008.”) uslijedili su nakon Ugovora od 1. studenoga 2007. koji su istekli.
a route to Charleroi four times a week throughout the year.
linija prema Charleroiu s četiri leta tjedno tijekom cijele godine.
It has also included the cost of the financial ‘incentives’ provided for in Article 8 of the airport services agreement of 27 August 2008, namely a payment by VTAN to Ryanair per outbound passenger, which increased in stages according to the number of passengers.
Analizom je obuhvatila i trošak nastao financijskim „poticajima” predviđenima u članku 8. Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 27. kolovoza 2008., odnosno plaćanje društva VTAN društvu Ryanair po putniku u odlasku koje se povećava po razredima u skladu s brojem putnika.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the agreements of 27 August 2008
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti Ugovora od 27. kolovoza 2008.
winter 2008-2009
zima 2008. – 2009.
summer 2009
ljeto 2009.
[450000-500000]
[450000 – 500000]
[500000-550000]
[500000 – 550000]
Table 13 in the above recital shows that an MEO would have expected negative incremental flows.
Tablicom 13. iz prethodne uvodne izjave pokazano je da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao negativne inkrementalne tokove.
Consequently, the agreements of 27 August 2008 conferred an economic advantage on Ryanair/AMS.
Prema tome, Ugovorima od 27. kolovoza 2008. društvu Ryanair/AMS dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost.
Agreements of 25 August 2009
Ugovori od 25. kolovoza 2009.
As a result, the incremental traffic associated with these agreements corresponds to all the routes and frequencies mentioned in the agreements of 27 August 2008.
Stoga inkrementalni promet povezan s tim Ugovorima odgovara svim linijama i letovima navedenima u Ugovorima od 27. kolovoza 2008.
It has also included the cost of the aforementioned financial ‘incentives’ provided for in Article 8 of the airport services agreement of 27 August 2008.
Analizom je obuhvatila i trošak nastao prethodno navedenim financijskim „poticajima” predviđenima u članku 8. Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 27. kolovoza 2008.
Result of reconstructing the ex ante profitability analysis for the agreements of 25 August 2009
Bilanca rekonstrukcije ex ante analize profitabilnosti Ugovora od 25. kolovoza 2009.
winter 2009-2010
zima 2009. – 2010.
summer 2010
ljeto 2010.
winter 2010-2011
zima 2010. – 2011.
summer 2011
ljeto 2011.
winter 2011-2012 (up to 31.12.2011)
zima 2011. – 2012.
[50-100]
[50 – 100]
Table 14 in the above recital shows that an MEO would have expected negative incremental flows.
Tablicom 14. iz prethodne uvodne izjave pokazano je da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao negativne inkrementalne tokove.
Consequently, the agreements of 25 August 2009 conferred an economic advantage on Ryanair/AMS.
Prema tome, Ugovorima od 25. kolovoza 2009. društvu Ryanair/AMS dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost.
Amendment of 18 August 2010
Izmjena od 18. kolovoza 2010.