natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commencement of the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings and prior closure of the proceedings
Početak kontradiktornog dijela postupka povodom prigovora i prethodno okončanje postupka
Where the opposition is found admissible pursuant to Article 5, the Office shall send a communication to the parties informing them that the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings shall be deemed to commence two months after receipt of the communication.
Ako je utvrđeno da je prigovor dopušten u skladu s člankom 5., Ured strankama šalje obavijest u kojoj ih obavješćuje da će se smatrati da je kontradiktorni dio postupka povodom prigovora započeo dva mjeseca nakon primitka obavijesti.
That period may be extended to a total of 24 months if both parties request an extension before the two-month period expires.
To se razdoblje može produljiti na ukupno 24 mjeseca ako obje stranke zatraže produljenje prije isteka roka od dva mjeseca.
Where, within the period referred to in paragraph 1, the application is withdrawn or restricted to goods or services against which the opposition is not directed, or the Office is informed about a settlement between the parties, or the application is rejected in parallel proceedings, the opposition proceedings shall be closed.
Ako se, u roku i stavka 1., prijava povuče ili ograniči na proizvode ili usluge na koje se prigovor ne odnosi, Ured bude obaviješten o nagodbi između stranaka ili zahtjev bude odbijen u usporednom postupku, postupak povodom prigovora okončava se.
Where, within the period referred to in paragraph 1, the applicant restricts the application by deleting some of the goods or services against which the opposition is directed, the Office shall invite the opposing party to state, within such a period as it may specify, whether it maintains the opposition, and if so, against which of the remaining goods or services.
Ako, u razdoblju iz stavka 1., podnositelj prijave ograniči prijavu brisanjem nekih proizvoda ili usluga na koje se prigovor odnosi, Ured poziva podnositelja prigovora da se izjasni, u roku koji je on odredio, ostaje li pri svom prigovoru i, ako ostaje, protiv kojih preostalih proizvoda ili usluga.
Where the opposing party withdraws the opposition in light of the restriction, the opposition proceedings shall be closed.
Ako podnositelj prigovora povuče prigovor zbog ograničenja, postupak povodom prigovora okončava se.
Where, before the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, the opposition proceedings are closed pursuant to paragraphs 2 or 3, no decision on costs shall be taken.
Ako je prije isteka razdoblja iz stavka 1. postupak povodom prigovora okončan u skladu sa stavcima 2. ili 3., ne donosi se odluka o troškovima.
Where, before the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, the opposition proceedings are closed following a withdrawal or restriction of the application pursuant to paragraph 2 or following a withdrawal of the opposition pursuant to paragraph 3, the opposition fee shall be refunded.
Ako je prije isteka razdoblja iz stavka 1. postupak povodom prigovora okončan nakon povlačenja ili ograničenja prijave u skladu sa stavkom 2. ili nakon povlačenja prigovora u skladu sa stavkom 3., izvršava se povrat pristojbe za prigovor.
Substantiation of the opposition
Potkrjepljenje prigovora
The Office shall give the opposing party the opportunity to submit the facts, evidence and arguments in support of the opposition or to complete any facts, evidence or arguments that have already been submitted pursuant to Article 2(4).
Ured daje podnositelju prigovora priliku da podnese činjenice, dokaze i argumente kojima će potkrijepiti prigovor ili da nadopuni činjenice, dokaze ili argumente koji su već podneseni u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 4.
For that purpose, the Office shall specify a time limit which shall be at least two months, starting on the date on which the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings are deemed to commence in accordance with Article 6(1).
U tu svrhu Ured navodi rok koji iznosi najmanje dva mjeseca počevši od datuma kada se smatra da je započeo kontradiktorni dio postupka povodom prigovora u skladu s člankom 6. stavkom 1.
Within the period referred to in paragraph 1, the opposing party shall also file evidence of the existence, validity and scope of protection of its earlier mark or right, as well as evidence proving its entitlement to file the opposition.
Podnositelj prigovora dostavlja u roku iz stavka 1. i dokaze o postojanju, valjanosti i opsegu zaštite svojega ranijeg žiga ili prava te dokaze o svojem pravu na podnošenje prigovora.
In particular, the opposing party shall provide the following evidence:
Podnositelj prigovora posebno dostavlja sljedeće dokaze:
where the opposition is based on an earlier trade mark within the meaning of Article 8(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, which is not an EU trade mark, evidence of its filing or registration, by submitting:
ako se prigovor temelji na ranijem žigu u smislu članka 8. stavka 2. točaka (a) i (b) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, koji nije žig EU-a, dokaze o podnošenju prijave ili registraciji dostavljanjem sljedećeg:
a copy of the relevant filing certificate or an equivalent document from the administration with which the trade mark application was filed, if the trade mark is not yet registered; or
i. preslike potvrde o podnošenju ili jednakovrijednog dokumenta koji izdaje uprava kojoj je podnesena prijava žiga, ako žig još nije registriran; ili
where the earlier trade mark is registered, a copy of the relevant registration certificate and, if applicable, of the latest renewal certificate, showing that the term of protection of the trade mark extends beyond the time limit referred to in paragraph 1 or any extension thereof, or equivalent documents from the administration by which the trade mark was registered;
ako je raniji žig registriran, preslike odgovarajuće potvrde o registraciji i, ako je primjenjivo, najnovije potvrde o produljenju, iz kojih je razvidno da se razdoblje zaštite žiga produljuje izvan roka iz stavka 1. ili njegova produljenja, ili jednakovrijednog dokumenta uprave kod koje je žig registriran;
where the opposition is based on a well-known mark within the meaning of Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, evidence showing that that mark is well known in the relevant territory for the goods or services indicated in accordance with Article 2(2)(g) of this Regulation;
ako se prigovor temelji na dobro poznatom žigu u smislu članka 8. stavka 2. točke (c) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaz da je žig dobro poznat na predmetnom državnom području za proizvode ili usluge navedene u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. točkom (g) ove Uredbe;
where the opposition is based on the absence of the proprietor's consent as referred to in Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, evidence of the opposing party's proprietorship of the prior trade mark and of its relationship with the agent or representative;
ako se prigovor temelji na nepostojanju suglasnosti nositelja kako je navedeno u članku 8. stavku 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaz o tome da je podnositelj prigovora nositelj ranijeg žiga i o njegovom odnosu s trgovačkim zastupnikom ili predstavnikom;
where the opposition is based on an earlier right within the meaning of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, evidence showing use of that right in the course of trade of more than mere local significance, as well as evidence of its acquisition, continued existence and scope of protection including, where the earlier right is invoked pursuant to the law of a Member State, a clear identification of the contents of the national law relied upon by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or jurisprudence;
ako se prigovor temelji na ranijem pravu u smislu članka 8. stavka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaze o uporabi tog prava u trgovačkom prometu koji nema samo lokalni značaj te dokaze o njegovu stjecanju, trajnom postojanju i opsegu zaštite uključujući, ako se poziva na ranije pravo u skladu sa zakonom države članice, jasno navođenje sadržaja nacionalnog zakona na kojem se temelji navođenjem objava relevantnih odredaba ili sudske prakse;
where the opposition is based on an earlier designation of origin or geographical indication within the meaning of Article 8(4a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, evidence of its acquisition, continued existence and scope of protection including, where the earlier designation of origin or geographical indication is invoked pursuant to the law of a Member State, a clear identification of the content of the national law relied upon by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or jurisprudence;
ako se prigovor temelji na ranijoj oznaci izvornosti ili oznaci zemljopisnog podrijetla u smislu članka 8. stavka 4.a Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, dokaze o njihovu stjecanju, trajnom postojanju i opsegu zaštite uključujući, u slučaju pozivanja na raniju oznaku izvornosti ili oznaku zemljopisnog podrijetla u skladu sa zakonom države članice, jasno navođenje sadržaja nacionalnog zakona na kojem se temelji navođenjem objava relevantnih odredaba ili sudske prakse;
if the opposition is based on a mark with a reputation within the meaning of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, in addition to the evidence referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, evidence showing that the mark has a reputation in the Union or in the Member State concerned for the goods or services indicated in accordance with Article 2(2)(g) of this Regulation, as well as evidence or arguments showing that use without due cause of the trade mark applied for would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.
ako se prigovor temelji na žigu s ugledom u smislu članka 8. stavka 5. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, uz dokaze iz točke (a) ovog stavka, dokaz da žig ima ugled u Uniji ili u predmetnoj državi članici za proizvode ili usluge navedene u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. točkom (g) ove Uredbe te dokaze ili argumente da bi se uporabom žiga za koji se podnosi prijava bez opravdanog razloga neopravdano iskoristio razlikovni karakter ili ugled ranijeg žiga ili bi im to štetilo.
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of the earlier rights referred to in paragraph 2(a) or, where applicable, paragraph 2(d) or (e), or the evidence concerning the contents of the relevant national law, is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the opposing party may provide such evidence by making reference to that source.
Ako su dokazi o prijavi ili registraciji ranijih prava iz stavka 2. točke (a) ili, gdje je to primjenjivo, stavka 2. točke (d) ili (e), ili dokazi povezani sa sadržajem nacionalnog zakona dostupni na internetu iz izvora koji Ured priznaje, podnositelj prigovora može dostaviti te dokaze upućivanjem na taj izvor.
Any filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents referred to in paragraph 2(a), (d) or (e), as well as any provisions of the applicable national law governing the acquisition of rights and their scope of protection as referred to in paragraph 2(d) and (e), including evidence accessible online as referred to in paragraph 3, shall be in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language.
Potvrde o prijavi, registraciji ili produljenju ili jednakovrijedni dokumenti iz stavka 2. točke (a) te sve odredbe primjenjivog nacionalnog zakonodavstva kojim se uređuje stjecanje prava i njihov opseg zaštite, kako je navedeno u stavku 2. točkama (d) i (e), uključujući dokaze dostupne na internetu kako je navedeno u stavku 3., sastavljeni su na jeziku postupka ili popraćeni prijevodom na taj jezik.
The translation shall be submitted by the opposing party on its own motion within the time limit specified for submitting the original document.
Podnositelj prigovora dostavlja prijevod u roku navedenom za podnošenje izvornog dokumenta.
Any other evidence submitted by the opposing party to substantiate the opposition shall be subject to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
Na sve ostale dokaze koje je podnositelj prigovora dostavio za potkrjepljenje prigovora primjenjuje se članak 24. Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.
Translations submitted after the expiry of the relevant time limits shall not be taken into account.
Prijevodi podneseni nakon isteka relevantnih rokova ne uzimaju se u obzir.
The Office shall not take into account written submissions, or parts thereof, that have not been submitted in or not been translated into the language of the proceedings within the time limit set by the Office in accordance with paragraph 1.
Ured ne uzima u obzir pisane podneske, ili njihove dijelove, koji nisu podneseni ili nisu prevedeni na jezik postupka u rokovima koje je Ured utvrdio u skladu sa stavkom 1.
Examination of the opposition
Ispitivanje prigovora
Where, until the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party has not provided any evidence, or where the evidence provided is manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient to meet the requirements laid down in Article 7(2) for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Ako do isteka roka iz članka 7. stavka 1. podnositelj prigovora nije dostavio nikakve dokaze ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi očito nerelevantni ili nedovoljni da bi ispunili uvjete iz članka 7. stavka 2. za bilo koje od ranijih prava, prigovor se odbija kao neosnovan.
Where the opposition is not rejected pursuant to paragraph 1, the Office shall communicate the submission of the opposing party to the applicant and shall invite it to file its observations within a period specified by the Office.
Ako prigovor nije odbijen u skladu sa stavkom 1., Ured šalje podnesak podnositelja prigovora podnositelju prijave i poziva ga da dostavi svoje primjedbe u roku koji je odredio Ured.
Where the applicant submits no observations, the Office shall base its ruling on the opposition on the evidence before it.
Ako podnositelj prijave ne dostavi primjedbe, Ured temelji svoju odluku o prigovoru na dostavljenim dokazima.
The observations submitted by the applicant shall be communicated to the opposing party who shall be invited, if the Office considers it necessary, to reply within a period specified by the Office.
Primjedbe koje je dostavio podnositelj prijave dostavljaju se podnositelju prigovora koji se poziva, ako to Ured smatra nužnim, da odgovori u roku koji je Ured odredio.
Where, after the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party submits facts or evidence that supplement relevant facts or evidence provided within that period and that relate to the same requirement laid down in Article 7(2), the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in deciding whether to accept these supplementing facts or evidence.
Ako nakon isteka roka iz članka 7. stavka 1. podnositelj prigovora dostavi činjenice ili dokaze kojima se dopunjuju relevantne činjenice ili dokazi dostavljeni u tom razdoblju i koji se odnose na isti uvjet iz članka 7. stavka 2., Ured na temelju diskrecijske ovlasti iz članka 76. stavka 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 odlučuje hoće li prihvatiti te dodatne činjenice ili dokaze.
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the facts or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the facts or evidence.
U tu svrhu Ured posebno uzima u obzir fazu postupka te hoće li te činjenice i dokazi na prvi pogled biti relevantni za ishod predmeta i postoje li opravdani razlozi za njihovo dostavljanje sa zakašnjenjem.
The Office shall invite the applicant to submit further observations in response if it deems it appropriate under the circumstances.
Ured poziva podnositelja prijave da kao odgovor dostavi dodatne primjedbe ako to smatra primjerenim s obzirom na okolnosti.
Where the opposition has not been rejected pursuant to paragraph 1 and the evidence submitted by the opposing party is not sufficient to substantiate the opposition in accordance with Article 7 for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Ako prigovor nije odbijen u skladu sa stavkom 1. i ako dokazi koje je dostavio podnositelj prigovora nisu dovoljni za potkrjepljenje prigovora u skladu s člankom 7. za bilo koje od ranijih prava, prigovor se odbija kao neosnovan.
Article 6(2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis after the date on which the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings is deemed to commence.
8. Članak 6. stavci 2. i 3. primjenjuju se na odgovarajući način nakon datuma kada se smatra da je započeo kontradiktorni dio postupka povodom prigovora.
Where the applicant wishes to withdraw or restrict the contested application, it shall do so by way of a separate document.
Ako podnositelj želi povući ili ograničiti prijavu protiv koje je podnesen prigovor, on to čini u zasebnom dokumentu.
In appropriate cases, the Office may invite the parties to limit their observations to particular issues, in which case it shall allow them to raise the other issues at a later stage of the proceedings.
Ured može u odgovarajućim slučajevima tražiti od stranaka da ograniče svoje primjedbe na određena pitanja i u tom im slučaju dopušta da postave druga pitanja u kasnijoj fazi postupka.
The Office shall not be required to inform a party of the possibility to produce certain relevant facts or evidence which that party previously failed to produce.
Ured nije dužan obavijestiti stranku da može dostaviti relevantne činjenice ili dokaze koje prethodno nije dostavila.
Multiple oppositions
Višestruki prigovori
Where a number of oppositions have been entered in respect of the same application for the registration of an EU trade mark, the Office may examine them in one set of proceedings.
Ako je dostavljeno više prigovora u odnosu na istu prijavu za registraciju žiga EU-a, Ured ih može ispitati u jednom skupu postupaka.
The Office may subsequently decide to examine those oppositions separately.
Ured može naknadno odlučiti da će te prigovore ispitati odvojeno.
Where a preliminary examination of one or more oppositions reveals that the EU trade mark for which an application for registration has been filed may be ineligible for registration in respect of some or all of the goods or services for which registration is sought, the Office may suspend the other opposition proceedings relating to that application.
Ako se tijekom prethodnog ispitivanja jednog ili više prigovora utvrdi da žig EU-a za koji je podnesena prijava za registraciju možda ne zadovoljava uvjete za registraciju u pogledu nekih, ili svih, proizvoda ili usluga za koje se traži registracija, Ured može obustaviti drugi postupak povodom prigovora koji se odnosi na tu prijavu.
The Office shall inform the opposing parties affected by the suspension of any relevant decisions taken in the context of those proceedings which are ongoing.
Ured obavješćuje podnositelje prigovora na koje utječe obustava o svim relevantnim odlukama donesenima u kontekstu tekućeg postupka.
Once a decision rejecting an application as referred to in paragraph 1 has become final, the oppositions for which proceedings have been suspended in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be deemed to have been disposed of and the opposing parties concerned shall be informed accordingly.
Kada odluka kojom se odbija prijava iz stavka 1. postane pravomoćna, smatra se da su prigovori u odnosu na koje su postupci obustavljeni u skladu sa stavkom 2. odbijeni i u skladu s time obavješćuju se predmetni podnositelji prigovora.
Such a disposition shall be considered to constitute a case which has not proceeded to judgment within the meaning of Article 85(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Takvo odbijanje smatra se predmetom u kojem nije donesena odluka u smislu članka 85. stavka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
The Office shall refund 50 % of the opposition fee paid by each opposing party whose opposition is deemed to have been disposed of in accordance with paragraph 3, provided that the suspension of the proceedings relating to that opposition took place before the commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings.
Ured vraća 50 % pristojbe za prigovor koju je platio svaki podnositelj prigovora čiji se prigovor smatra odbijenim u skladu sa stavkom 3. pod uvjetom da je postupak povezan s tim prigovorom obustavljen prije početka kontradiktornog dijela postupka.
Proof of use
Dokaz o uporabi
A request for proof of use of an earlier mark pursuant to Article 42(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall be admissible if it is submitted as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 8(2) of this Regulation.
Zahtjev za dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga u skladu s člankom 42. stavcima 2. ili 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 dopušten je ako je podnesen kao bezuvjetni zahtjev u zasebnom dokumentu u roku koji je Ured odredio u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 2. ove Uredbe.
Where the applicant has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark which complies with the requirements of Article 42(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Office shall invite the opposing party to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Ako je podnositelj prijave zatražio dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga koji je u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 42. stavka 2. ili 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009, Ured poziva podnositelja prigovora da dostavi potrebni dokaz u roku koji je odredio Ured.
Where the opposing party does not provide any evidence or reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or where the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly insufficient or irrelevant, the Office shall reject the opposition in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Ako podnositelj prigovora ne dostavi dokaz ili razlog za neuporabu prije isteka roka ili ako su dostavljeni dokazi ili razlozi očito nedovoljni ili nerelevantni, Ured odbija prigovor ako se on temelji na tom ranijem žigu.
The indications and evidence of use shall establish the place, time, extent and nature of use of the opposing trade mark for the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and on which the opposition is based.
Podacima i dokazima kojima se dokazuje uporaba utvrđuju se mjesto, vrijeme, opseg i priroda uporabe žiga protiv kojeg se podnosi prigovor za proizvode ili usluge za koje je registriran i na kojima se temelji prigovor.
The evidence referred to in paragraph 3 shall be filed in accordance with Article 55(2) and Articles 63 and 64 and shall be limited to the submission of supporting documents and items such as packages, labels, price lists, catalogues, invoices, photographs, newspaper advertisements, and statements in writing as referred to in Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Dokazi iz stavka 3. dostavljaju se u skladu s člankom 55. stavkom 2. i člancima 63. i 64., a ograničeni su na podnošenje pratećih dokumenata i predmeta kao što su paketi, oznake, cjenici, katalozi, računi, fotografije, novinski oglasi i pisane izjave iz članka 78. stavka 1. točke (f) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009.
A request for proof of use may be filed at the same time as observations on the grounds on which the opposition is based.
Zahtjev za dokaz o uporabi može se podnijeti istodobno kad i primjedbe o razlozima na kojima se temelji prigovor.
Where the evidence supplied by the opposing party is not in the language of the opposition proceedings, the Office may require the opposing party to submit a translation of that evidence in that language pursuant to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
Ako dokaz koji je dostavio podnositelj prigovora nije na jeziku postupka povodom prigovora, Ured može zatražiti od podnositelja prigovora da dostavi prijevod tih dokaza na taj jezik u skladu s člankom 24. Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.