natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The methodology for the application of Article 53(3) is set out in the Authority guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement cited in footnote 4.
Metodologija primjene članka 53. stavka 3. utvrđena je u Smjernicama Tijela za primjenu članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u, navedenima u bilješci 4.
See Case 56/65, Société Technique Minière [1966] ECR 337, and Case C-7/95 P, John Deere [1998] ECR I-3111, paragraph 76.
Vidjeti predmet 56/65, Société Technique Minière, [1966] ECR 337, i predmet C-7/95 P, John Deere, [1998] ECR I-3111, točku 76.
See in this respect, e.g. the judgment in Consten and Grundig cited in footnote 11.
U odnosu na navedeno vidjeti npr. presudu u predmetu Consten and Grundig, koja je navedena u bilješci 11.
See in this respect the judgment in Société Technique Minière cited in footnote 13 and Case 258/78, Nungesser [1982] ECR 2015.
Vidjeti u tom pogledu presudu u predmetu Société Technique Minière navedenu u bilješci 13. i predmet 258/78, Nungesser, [1982] ECR 2015.
For examples see points (126) to (127).
Vidjeti primjerice točke 126. do 127.
See in this respect, e.g. Case C-49/92 P, Anic Partecipazioni [1999] ECR I-4125, paragraph 99.
U odnosu na navedeno vidjeti, primjerice, predmet C-49/92 P, Anic Partecipazioni, [1999] ECR I-4125, točku 99.
See Joined Cases 29/83 and 30/83, CRAM and Rheinzink [1984] ECR 1679, paragraph 26, and Joined Cases 96/82 and others, Anseau-Navewa [1983] ECR 3369, paragraphs 23-25.
Vidjeti spojene predmete 29/83 i 30/83, CRAM and Rheinzink, [1984] ECR 1679, točku 26., i spojene predmete 96/82 i druge, ANSEAU-NAVEWA, [1983] ECR 3369, točke 23. – 25.
Case T-491/07 Groupement des cartes bancaires v Commission, judgment of 29 November 2012, paragraph 146.
Predmet T-491/07 Groupement des cartes bancaires v Commission, presuda od 29. studenoga 2012., točka 146.
Case C-209/07 Beef Industry Development Society and Barry Brothers [2008] ECR I-8637, paragraph 21.
Predmet C-209/07 Beef Industry Development Society and Barry Brothers [2008] ECR I-8637, točka 21.
Further guidance with regard to the notion of restriction of competition by object can be obtained in the Authority guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement cited in footnote 4.
Daljnje smjernice u odnosu na pitanje ograničenja tržišnog natjecanja po cilju mogu se naći u Smjernicama Tijela za primjenu članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u, navedene u bilješci 4.
See also Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services and Others v Commission and Others [2009] ECR I-9291, paragraphs 59 to 64.
Vidjeti i spojene predmete C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P i C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services and Others v Commission and Others [2009] ECR I-9291, točke 59. – 64.
Case C-209/07 Beef Industry Development Society and Barry Brothers [2008] ECR I-8637, paragraphs 21 to 39.
Predmet C-209/07 Beef Industry Development Society and Barry Brothers, [2008] ECR I 8637, točke 21. – 39.
Case C-8/08 T-Mobile Netherlands and Others [2009] ECR I-4529, paragraphs 31 and 36 to 39 and Case C-32/11 Allianz Hungária Biztosító and Others, judgment of 14 March 2013, paragraphs 33 to 38.
Predmet C-8/08 T-Mobile Netherlands and Others, [2009] ECR I-4529, točke 31. i 36. – 39. te predmet C-32/11 Allianz Hungária Biztosító and Others, presuda od 14. ožujka 2013., točke 33. – 38.
See the judgment in John Deere cited in footnote 13.
Vidjeti presudu u predmetu John Deere navedenu u bilješci 13.
Guidance on the issue of appreciability can be found in the Authority notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (OJ C 67, 20.3.2003, p. 20 and EEA Supplement No 15, 20.3.2003, p. 11.).
Smjernice o pitanju osjetnosti mogu se naći u Obavijesti Tijela o sporazumima male vrijednosti kojima se prema članku 53. stavku 1. Sporazuma o EGP-u (SL C 67, 20.3.2003., str. 20 i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 15., 20.3.2003., str. 11.) osjetno ne ograničava tržišno natjecanje.
The notice defines appreciability in a negative way.
U Obavijesti se osjetnost definira na negativan način.
Agreements, which fall outside the scope of the de minimis notice, do not necessarily have appreciable restrictive effects.
Sporazumi koji su izvan područja primjene de minimis obavijesti nemaju nužno osjetne ograničavajuće učinke.
An individual assessment is required.
Potrebna je pojedinačna ocjena.
Case T-321/05 Astra Zeneca v Commission [2010] ECR II-2805, paragraph 267.
Predmet T-321/05 Astra Zeneca v Commission, [2010] ECR II-2805, točka 267.
The Authority's guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement, point 26, cited in footnote 4.
Smjernice Tijela o primjeni članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u, točka 26. navedene u bilješci 4.
See Article 1(2) of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Vidjeti članak 1. stavak 2. Poglavlja II. Protokola 4. Sporazuma o nadzoru i sudu.
Notice of the EFTA Surveillance Authority on the definition of the relevant market for the purpose of competition law within the European Economic Area (EEA) (OJ L 200, 16.7.1998, p. 48 and EEA Supplement No 28, 16.7.1998, p. 3).
Obavijest Nadzornog tijela EFTA-e o utvrđivanju mjerodavnog tržišta u smislu prava tržišnog natjecanja u Europskom gospodarskom prostoru (EGP) (SL L 200., 16.7.1998., str. 48. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 28, 16.7.1998., str. 3.).
See for example Commission Decision COMP/M.5675 Syngenta/Monsanto where the Commission analysed the merger of two vertically integrated sunflower breeders by examining both: (i) the upstream market for the trading (namely the exchange and licensing) of varieties (parental lines and hybrids); and (ii) the downstream market for the commercialisation of hybrids.
Vidjeti, na primjer, Odluku Komisije COMP/M.5675 Syngenta/Monsanto, u kojoj je Komisija analizirala spajanje dvaju vertikalno integriranih uzgajivača suncokreta ispitivanjem i. uzvodne trgovine (razmjene i licenciranja) sorti (roditeljske sorte i hibridi) i ii. nizvodnog tržišta za komercijalizaciju hibrida.
In COMP/M.5406, IPIC/MAN Ferrostaal AG, the Commission defined besides a market for the production of high-grade melamine also an upstream technology market for the supply of melamine production technology.
U COMP/M.5406, IPIC/MAN Ferrostaal AG, Komisija je, uz tržište za proizvodnju melamina visokog stupnja, utvrdila i uzvodno tržište tehnologije za isporuku tehnologije za proizvodnju melamina.
See also COMP/M.269, Shell/Montecatini.
Vidjeti i COMP/M.269, Shell/Montecatini.
See also Commission Decision COMP/M.5675 Syngenta/Monsanto and Decision COMP/M.5406, IPIC/MAN Ferrostaal AG.
Vidjeti i Odluku Komisije COMP/M.5675 Syngenta/Monsanto i Odluku COMP/M.5406, IPIC/MAN Ferrostaal AG.
See also points (119) to (122) of the Authority guidelines on the applicability of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement to horizontal cooperation agreements (‘Horizontal Guidelines’) ( OJ C 362, 12.12.2013, p. 3 and EEA Supplement No 69, 12.12.2013, p. 1).
Vidjeti i točke 119. do 122. Smjernica Tijela o primjenjivosti članka 53. Sporazuma o EGP-u na horizontalne sporazume o suradnji („Horizontalne smjernice”) ( SL C 362, 12.12.2013., str. 3. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 69, 12.12.2013., str. 1.).
See also point (157).
Vidjeti i točku 157.
In a scenario where undertakings have given a general commitment to license certain intellectual property rights, the parties cannot be considered to be in a blocking position on the basis of these intellectual property rights.
U scenariju kada su se poduzetnici općenito obvezali na licenciranje određenih prava intelektualnog vlasništva ne može se smatrati da su sudionici u blokirajućem položaju na temelju tih prava intelektualnog vlasništva.
Joined Cases T-374/94, T-375/94, T-384/94 and T-388/94, European Night Services and Others v Commission [1998] ECR II-3141, paragraph 137.
Spojeni predmeti T-374/94, T-375/94, T-384/94 i T-388/94, European Night Services and Others v Commission, [1998] ECR II- 3141, točka 137.
Case T-461/07, Visa Europe Ltd and Visa International Service v European Commission [2011] ECR II-1729, paragraph 167.
Predmet T-461/07, Visa Europe Ltd and Visa International Service v European Commission, [2011] ECR II-1729, točka 167.
Case T-461/07, Visa Europe Ltd and Visa International Service v European Commission [2011] ECR II-1729, paragraph 189.
Predmet T-461/07, Visa Europe Ltd and Visa International Service v European Commission, [2011] ECR II-1729, točka 189.
See in this respect the notice on agreements of minor importance cited in footnote 22.
Vidjeti u tome smislu Obavijest o sporazumima manje vrijednosti navedenu u bilješki 22.
According to Article 3(2) of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, agreements which may affect trade between EFTA states, but which are not prohibited by Article 53, cannot be prohibited by national competition law.
U skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 2. Poglavlja II. Protokola 4. Sporazuma o nadzoru i sudu sporazumi koji bi mogli utjecati na trgovinu između država EFTA-e, ali nisu zabranjeni člankom 53., ne mogu biti zabranjeni nacionalnim pravom tržišnog natjecanja.
The TTBER could now cover the technology transfer agreement assessed in the Commission Decision in Moosehead/Whitbread (OJ L 100, 20.4.1990, p. 32), see in particular paragraph 16 of that decision.
TTBER bi se sada mogao primjenjivati na sporazum o prijenosu tehnologije iz Odluke Komisije u predmetu Moosehead/Whitbread (SL L 100, 20.4.1990., str. 32.), vidjeti posebno stavak 16. te Odluke.
See in this respect Case 262/81, Coditel (II) [1982] ECR 3381.
U vezi s tim vidjeti predmet 262/81, Coditel (II), [1982] ECR 3381.
OJ L 102, 23.4.2010, p. 1, incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Decision 77/2010 (OJ L 244, 16.9.2010, p. 35 and EEA Supplement No 49, 16.9.2010, p. 34).
SL L 102, 23.4.2010., str. 1., ugrađena u Sporazum o EGP-u Odlukom 77/2010 (SL L 244, 16.9.2010., str. 35. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 49, 16.9.2010., str. 34.).
The terms ‘licensing’ or ‘licensed’ used in these guidelines does also include assignment, non-assertion or settlement arrangements as long as a transfer of technology rights takes place as described in this section.
Termini „licenciranje” i „licencirani” iz ovih Smjernica uključuju i sporazume o ustupanju, nepozivanju na prava ili namiri, pod uvjetom da se prijenos prava na tehnologiju odvija tako kako je opisano u ovom odjeljku.
See further on settlement agreements points (234) ff.
Za više o sporazumima o namiri vidjeti točke 234. i dalje.
See recital 6 of the TTBER and further Section 3.2.6.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 6. TTBER-a i sljedeći odjeljak 3.2.6.
See for more details point (248).
Dodatne pojedinosti potražite u točki 248.
OJ C 362, 22.11.2012, p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 65, 22.11.2012, p. 1.
SL C 362, 22.11.2012., str. 1. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 65, 22.11.2012., str. 1.
OJ L 153, 18.6.1994, p. 30 and EEA Supplement No 15, 18.6.1994, p. 29.
SL L 153, 18.6.1994., str. 30. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 15, 18.6.1994., str. 29.
See point 3 of the Authority notice on subcontracting agreements cited in footnote 44.
Vidjeti točku 3. Obavijesti Tijela o ocjeni određenih ugovora o podugovaranju navedene u bilješci 44.
See also Section 3.2.6.1.
Vidjeti također odjeljak 3.2.6.1.
However, this last example is covered by Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 cited in footnote 50, see also Section 3.2.6.1 below.
Međutim, posljednji primjer obuhvaćen je Uredbom (EU) br. 1217/2010 navedenom u bilješci 50, vidjeti također odjeljak 3.2.6.1. u nastavku.
OJ L 335, 18.12.2010, p. 43, incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Decision 3/2011 (OJ L 93, 7.4.2011, p. 32 and EEA Supplement No 19, 7.4.2011, p. 7).
SL L 335, 18.12.2010., str. 43., ugrađena u Sporazum o EGP-u Odlukom 3/2011 (SL L 93, 7.4.2011., str. 32. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 19, 7.4.2011., str. 7.).
OJ L 335, 18.12.2010, p. 36, incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Decision 3/2011 (OJ L 93, 7.4.2011, p. 32 and EEA Supplement No 19, 7.4.2011, p. 7).
SL L 335, 18.12.2010., str. 36., ugrađena u Sporazum o EGP-u Odlukom 3/2011 (SL L 93, 7.4.2011., str. 32. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 19, 7.4.2011., str. 7.).
See also the brochure ‘Competition policy in Europe — The competition rules for supply and distribution agreements’, European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union 2012, Luxembourg.
Vidjeti vodič „Politika tržišnog natjecanja u Europi — Pravila tržišnog natjecanja koja se odnose na sporazume o nabavi i distribuciji”, Europska komisija, Ured za publikacije Europske unije, 2012., Luxembourg.
Respectively footnote 39 and footnote 44.
Bilješka 39 i bilješka 44
See, e.g. the case-law cited in footnote 18.
Vidjeti, primjerice sudsku praksu navedenu u bilješci 18.
See point 18 of the Authority guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement cited in footnote 4.
Vidjeti točku 18. Smjernica Tijela za primjenu članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u citiranih u bilješci 4.
Case T-17/93, Matra [1994] ECR II-595, paragraph 85.
Predmet T-17/93 Matra [1994] ECR II-595, točka 85.
See in this respect point 98 of the guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement cited in footnote 4.
U odnosu na navedeno vidjeti točku 98. Smjernica za primjenu članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u navedenih u bilješci 4.
This is also the case where one party grants a licence to the other party and accepts to buy a physical input from the licensee.
To je slučaj i kada jedan sudionik ustupa licencu drugom sudioniku i pristaje kupovati fizički proizvod od stjecatelja licence.
The purchase price can serve the same function as the royalty.
Kupovna cijena može tada imati istu funkciju kao i licencijska naknada.
See in this respect Case 193/83, Windsurfing International [1986] ECR 611, paragraph 67.
U odnosu na navedeno vidjeti predmet 193/83, Windsurfing International, [1986] ECR 611, točku 67.
See footnote 44, point 51.
Vidjeti bilješku 44. uz točku 51.
Field of use restrictions are further dealt with in points (208) ff.
Ograničenja koja se odnose na polja primjene obrađena su detaljnije u točkama (208) i dalje.
For a definition of passive sales, see point (108) of these guidelines and the Authority guidelines on vertical restraints cited in footnote 44, point 51.
Za definiciju pasivne prodaje, vidjeti točku 108. ovih Smjernica i Smjernice Tijela o vertikalnim ograničenjima navedene u bilješci 44. točka 51.
This hardcore restriction applies to technology transfer agreements concerning trade within the EEA.
Ova apsolutna zabrana ograničenja primjenjuje se na sporazume o prijenosu tehnologije koji se odnose na trgovinu unutar EGP-a.
In so far as technology transfer agreements concern exports outside the EEA or imports/re-imports from outside the EEA see judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-306/96, Javico v Yves Saint Laurent [1998] ECR I-1983.
Ako se sporazumi o prijenosu tehnologije odnose na izvoz izvan EGP-a ili uvoz/ponovni uvoz iz država izvan EGP-a, vidjeti presudu Suda Europske unije u predmetu C-306/96, Javico v Yves Saint Laurenta [1998] ECR I-1983.
In that judgment the ECJ held in paragraph 20 that ‘an agreement in which the reseller gives to the producer an undertaking that it will sell the contractual products on a market outside the Community cannot be regarded as having the object of appreciably restricting competition within the common market or as being capable of affecting, as such, trade between Member States’.
U toj je presudi Sud u točki 20. zaključio da „ne može se smatrati da sporazum u kojem se prodavatelj proizvođaču obvezuje da će ugovorene proizvode prodati na tržištu izvan Zajednice ima za cilj osjetno ograničavanje tržišnog natjecanja na zajedničkom tržištu ili da kao takav može utjecati na trgovinu između država članica”.
See in this respect Case 26/76, Metro (I) [1977] ECR 1875.
Vidjeti u tom smislu predmet 26/76, Metro (I), [1977] ECR 1875.
See in this respect Case 65/86, Bayer v Süllhofer [1988] ECR 5249.
Vidjeti predmet 65/86, Bayer v Süllhofer, [1988] ECR 5249.
Cf. in respect of challenging the ownership of a trademark Commission Decision in Moosehead/Whitbread (OJ L 100, 20.4.1990, p. 32).
U odnosu na osporavanje vlasništva žiga, Odluka Komisije u predmetu Moosehead/Whitbread (SL L 100, 20.4.1990., str. 32.).
Case 193/83 Windsurfing International [1986] ECR 611, paragraph 92.
Predmet 193/83 Windsurfing International [1986] ECR 611, točka 92.
In the context of an agreement which is technically not an exclusive agreement, and where a termination clause is thus not covered by the safe harbour of the TTBER, the licensor may, in a specific case, be in a similar situation of dependency in relation to a licensee with considerable buyer power.
U kontekstu sporazuma koji tehnički nije isključivi sporazum, i u kojem klauzula o raskidu nije stoga obuhvaćena sigurnom lukom TTBER-a, davatelj licence može, u specifičnom slučaju, biti u sličnoj situaciji u kojoj je ovisan o stjecatelju licence s velikom kupovnom moći.
Such dependency will be taken into account in the individual assessment.
Takva ovisnost uzet će se u obzir u pojedinačnoj procjeni.
See point (14) above.
Vidjeti ranije spomenutu točku 14.
See point (36) above.
Vidjeti prethodnu točku 36.
See in this respect point 42 of the Authority guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement, cited in footnote 4.
U odnosu na navedeno vidjeti točku 42. Smjernica Tijela za primjenu članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u navedenih u bilješci 4.
However, it follows from Article 7(2) of the TTBER that if an EFTA state addressee notifies the EFTA Surveillance Authority that it does not accept its recommendation, the Authority shall notify the Commission of this response.
Međutim, iz članka 7. stavka 2. TTBER-a proizlazi da ako primatelj u državi EFTA-e obavijesti Nadzorno tijelo EFTA-e da ne prihvaća njegovu preporuku, Tijelo o tom odgovoru treba obavijestiti Komisiju.
Should the Commission disagree with the position of the EFTA state in question, Article 92(2) of the EEA Agreement shall apply.
Ako se Komisija ne slaže sa stavom te države EFTA-e, primjenjuje se članak 92. stavak 2. Sporazuma o EGP-u.
See in this respect point 8 of the Authority notice on agreements of minor importance, cited in footnote 22.
Vidjeti u tome smislu točku 8. Obavijesti Tijela o sporazumima manje vrijednosti, navedene u bilješci 22.
See in this respect Case T-228/97, Irish Sugar [1999] ECR II-2969, paragraph 101.
Vidjeti u tome smislu Predmet T-228/97, Irish Sugar, [1999] ECR II-2969, točku 101.
See in this respect point 36 of the Authority guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements, cited in footnote 29.
Vidjeti u tom smislu točku 36. Smjernica Tijela o horizontalnim sporazumima o suradnji, navedenih u bilješci 29.
Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services and Others v Commission and Others [2009] ECR I-9291, paragraph 82.
Spojeni predmeti C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P i C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services and Others v Commission and Others [2009] ECR I-9291, točka 82.
See Joined Cases 25/84 and 26/84, Ford [1985] ECR 2725;
Vidjeti spojene predmete 25/84 i 26/84, Ford, [1985] ECR 2725.
Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services and Others v Commission and Others [2009] ECR I-9291, paragraph 103.
Spojeni predmeti C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P i C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services and Others v Commission and Others [2009] ECR I-9291, točka 103.
See in this respect for example Commission Decision of 3 March 1999, TPS (OJ L 90, 2.4.1999, p. 6).
Vidjeti u tome smislu Odluku Komisije od 3. ožujka 1999., TPS (SL L 90, 2.4.1999., str. 6).
Similarly, the prohibition of Article 53(1) also only applies as long as the agreement has a restrictive object or restrictive effects.
Zabrana iz članka 53. stavka 1. primjenjuje se samo dok sporazum ima ograničavajući cilj ili ograničavajuće učinke.
Cited in footnote 44.
Citirano u bilješci 44.
See in particular paragraphs 106 et seq.
Vidjeti posebno stavke 106. et seq.
As to these concepts see Section 4.4.1.
U odnosu na te pojmove vidjeti odjeljak 4.4.1.
See point 85 of the Authority guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement, cited in footnote 4.
Vidjeti točku 85. Smjernica Tijela za primjenu članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u, citiranih u bilješci 4.
Idem, paragraphs 98 and 102.
Idem, stavci 98. i 102.
See by analogy paragraph 130 of Joined Cases C-395/96 P and C-396/96 P, Compagnie Maritime Belge, cited in footnote 4.
Vidjeti prema analogiji točku 130. spojenih predmeta C-395/96 P i C-396/96 P, Compagnie Maritime Belge, naveden u bilješci 4.
Similarly, the application of Article 53(3) does not prevent the application of the EEA rules on the free movement of goods, services, persons and capital.
Isto tako, primjena članka 53. stavka 3. ne sprječava primjenu pravila EGP-a o slobodnom kretanju roba, usluga, osoba i kapitala.
These provisions are in certain circumstances applicable to agreements, decisions and concerted practices within the meaning of Article 53(1), see in this regard Case C-309/99, Wouters [2002] ECR I-1577, paragraph 120.
Te se odredbe u određenim okolnostima primjenjuju na sporazume, odluke i usklađeno djelovanje u smislu članka 53. stavka 1., vidjeti u tome smislu predmet C-309/99, Wouters, [2002] ECR I-1577, točku 120.
See in this respect Case T-51/89, Tetra Pak (I) [1990] ECR II-309.
Vidjeti u tome smislu predmet T-51/89, Tetra Pak (I), [1990] ECR II-309.
See also point 106 of the Authority guidelines on the application of Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement cited in footnote 4 above.
Vidjeti isto točku 106. Smjernica Tijela o primjeni članka 53. stavka 3. Sporazuma o EGP-u navedenih ranije u prethodnoj bilješci 4.
This is without prejudice to the possible application of Article 54 to the setting of royalties (see Case 27/76, United Brands, paragraph 250, see also Case C-385/07 P, Der Grüne Punkt — Duales System Deutschland GmbH [2009] ECR I-6155, paragraph 142).
Pritom se ne dovodi u pitanje moguća primjena članka 54. na određivanje licencijskih naknada (vidjeti Predmet 27/76, United Brands, točka 250. i Predmet C-385/07 P, Der Grüne Punkt – Duales System Deutschland GmbH [2009] ECR I-6155, točka 142).
See the judgment in Nungesser cited in footnote 15.
Vidjeti presudu u predmetu Nungesser navedenom u bilješci 15.
See in this respect the Commission's notice in the Canon/Kodak Case (OJ C 330, 1.11.1997, p. 10) and the IGR Stereo Television Case mentioned in the XI Report on Competition Policy, paragraph 94.
Vidjeti u tom smislu Obavijest Komisije o predmetu Canon/Kodak (SL C 330, 1.11.1997., str. 10.) i predmetu IGR Stereo Television iz XI. Izvješća o politici tržišnog natjecanja, točka 94.
For the applicable analytical framework see Section 4.2.7 and points 129 et seq. of the Authority guidelines on vertical restraints cited in footnote 44.
Informacije o primjenjivom analitičkom okviru potražite u odjeljku 4.2.7. i točkama 129. et seq. Smjernica Tijela o vertikalnim ograničenjima navedenih u bilješci 44.
The TTBER and its guidelines are without prejudice to the application of Article 53 to settlement agreements which do not contain a licensing agreement.
TTBER i njegove smjernice ne dovode u pitanje primjenu članka 53. na sporazume o namiri koji ne sadržavaju sporazum o licenciranju.
Case 193/83 Windsurfing v Commission [1986] ECR 611, paragraph 92.
Predmet 193/83 Windsurfing protiv Komisije [1986] ECR 611, točka 92.
Cf. Case 65/86 Bayer v Sulhofer [1988], ECR 5259, paragraph 15.
Usporedi predmet 65/86 Bayer protiv Sulhofera [1988], ECR 5259, točku 15.
See, for instance, the Commission Decision in Lundbeck, not yet published.
Vidjeti, na primjer, Odluku Komisije u predmetu Lundbeck, koja još nije objavljena.
Cf. Case C-457/10 P, AstraZeneca v Commission [2012] ECR not yet published.
Usporedi Predmet C-457/10 P, AstraZeneca v. Commission, [2012] ECR, koji još nije objavljen.
See concerning the treatment of standards and the treatment of standardisation agreements the Horizontal Guidelines, point 257 ff., cited in footnote 29.
U vezi s tretmanom standarda i sporazuma o standardizaciji vidjeti Horizontalne smjernice, točku 257 i dalje., navedeno u bilješci 29.