natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, in its view, the Aéroports de Paris case-law is not applicable to the present case as that ruling concerned a large European hub and dealt with a legal issue unconnected with the problem of airport financing.
Osim toga, sudska praksa iz predmeta Aéroports de Pariz nije primjenjiva u tom slučaju jer se odnosi na veliko europsko čvorište i na pravno pitanje koje nije povezano s problematikom financiranja zračnih luka.
This legislative provision has changed during the course of the period under review, i.e. from 2000 to 2010.
Ta se zakonodavna odredba mijenjala tijekom ispitivanog razdoblja, odnosno od 2000. do 2010.
It is also clear that their purpose was not to generally promote travel to Nîmes and its region, but to specifically promote the use of Ryanair’s transport services, which was the only airline offering scheduled flights from Nîmes airport from 2003 onwards.
Nadalje, iz toga proizlazi da njihov cilj nije bilo neselektivno promicanje posjećenosti Nîmesa i njegove regije, nego izričito promicanje upotrebe prijevoznih usluga društva Ryanair, jedinog prijevoznika koji je od 2003. nudio redovne letove iz Zračne luke Nîmes.
This logic is also valid for VTAN, which clearly pursued the same policy as the CCI, spurred on by the SMAN.
Ta logika vrijedi i za društvo VTAN, koje je očito provodilo istu politiku kao komora CCI pod utjecajem sindikata SMAN.
Moreover, this business plan is not likely to have been biased by the present procedure, given that the Commission initiated its action on the basis of a complaint that was only received in January 2010.
Usto, na taj poslovni plan nije mogao utjecati ovaj postupak jer je Komisija počela djelovati na temelju pritužbe primljene tek u siječnju 2010.
The examination of this business plan and associated documents has not revealed any rash or unrealistic assumptions among those used by Veolia Transport to produce this plan.
Ispitivanje tog poslovnog plana i pripadajućih dokumenata nije ukazalo da se pri njegovu sastavljanju Veolia Transport oslonila na neoprezne ili nerealne pretpostavke.
Aside from the VTAN business plan, the only economic assessment provided by France is a study of the economic impact of Nîmes airport, carried out in 2006.
Osim poslovnog plana društva VTAN, jedinu brojčanu gospodarsku procjenu koju je dostavila Francuska jest studija o gospodarskim utjecajima Zračne luke Nîmes koja je provedena 2006.
This study focuses on the economic impact of the airport’s activity, and particularly the routes operated by Ryanair from this airport, on the region’s economy.
Ta se studija većinom odnosi na gospodarski učinak djelatnosti Zračne luke i osobito linija kojima Ryanair upravlja iz te Zračne luke na gospodarstvo regije.
As a result, the method used by France involved calculating the average unit costs and revenues per passenger based on the airport’s operating costs and revenues observed during the 2000-2006 period.
Tako se metoda koju je odabrala Francuska temelji na računanju prosječnih jediničnih troškova i prihoda po putniku na temelju operativnih troškova i prihoda zračne luke promatranih u razdoblju od 2000. do 2006.
In its analysis of each agreement, France multiplied these data by the projected incremental traffic for each agreement, i.e. the traffic that, on the signature of the agreement, this could be expected to generate.
U svojoj analizi svakog ugovora Francuska se služila tim podatcima množeći ih s inkrementalnim prometom predviđenim za svaki ugovor, odnosno s prometom koji bi se mogao od tog ugovora očekivati u vrijeme njegova sklapanja.
The Commission has therefore used the figures provided by France on the commercial non-aeronautical revenue for the entire airport, observed during the 1999-2006 period.
Komisija se oslonila na podatke koje je proslijedila Francuska u pogledu komercijalnih izvanzrakoplovnih prihoda cijele Zračne luke koji su zabilježeni u razdoblju od 1999. do 2006.
The Commission takes the view that these figures offer the most reliable basis, bearing in mind that, unlike the property-related revenue, which is fixed, the commercial revenue varies according to the traffic, and in an almost proportional manner.
Komisija te podatke smatra najpouzdanijim temeljem jer, za razliku od državnih prihoda, koji su fiksni, komercijalni prihodi variraju ovisno o prometu, i to gotovo proporcionalno.
However, as Ryanair had no previous experience of operating to Nîmes and the agreement did not provide for any marketing activities comparable to those subsequently provided by AMS, the Commission takes the view that it is not appropriate to use the load factor of 85 % accepted for the agreements signed from 2005.
Međutim, iako Ryanair nije imao nikakvo prethodno iskustvo pružanja usluga prema Nîmesu te iako ugovorom nisu bile predviđene marketinške usluge usporedive s onima koje je kasnije pružalo društvo AMS, Komisija smatra da nije bilo primjereno primijeniti čimbenik od 85 % usvojen u pogledu ugovora sklopljenih od 2005.
It has therefore opted for a load factor of 75 %.
Stoga je primijenila čimbenik od 75 %.
As regards the incremental aeronautical revenue, it has taken into account the airport charges applicable in 2001.
U pogledu inkrementalnih zrakoplovnih prihoda, Komisija je uzela u obzir naknade zračne luke koje su bile primjenjive 2001.
With regard to the incremental marketing costs, the Commission has included, in its analysis, the general increase of EUR […] per outbound passenger until the 2000 agreement expired, together with the additional increase stipulated for the 2002 summer season for all passengers (and not just those corresponding to the additional daily flight).
U pogledu inkrementalnih marketinških troškova, Komisija je svojom analizom obuhvatila opće povećanje od […] EUR po putniku u odlasku do isteka Ugovora iz 2000. te dodatno povećanje predviđeno za ljetnu sezonu 2002. za sve putnike (a ne samo one koji lete dodatnim letom).
This table shows that an MEO would have expected negative annual incremental flows until the 2000 agreement expired, as amended by the correspondence exchanged between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002.
Tom je tablicom pokazano da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao negativne godišnje inkrementalne tokove do isteka Ugovora iz 2000. koji je izmijenjen dopisima od kraja 2001. do početka 2002.
Consequently, the transaction consisting of the correspondence exchanged between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002 conferred an economic advantage on Ryanair.
Prema tome, transakcijom koja je proizašla iz dopisa od kraja 2001. do početka 2002. društvu Ryanair dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost.
This additional traffic as a result of the second daily flight during the 2004 summer season is the only incremental traffic associated with the correspondence exchanged in 2004.
Taj dodatni promet koji odgovara drugom letu u ljetnoj sezoni 2004. jedini je inkrementalni promet povezan s dopisima iz 2004.
This table shows that an MEO would have expected a negative incremental flow in 2004.
Tom je tablicom pokazano da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao negativni inkrementalni tok u 2004.
Consequently, the transaction consisting of the correspondence exchanged in 2004 conferred an economic advantage on Ryanair.
Prema tome, transakcijom koja je proizašla iz dopisa 2004. društvu Ryanair dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost.
This table shows that an MEO would have expected negative annual incremental flows until the 2005 agreements expired.
Tom je tablicom pokazano da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao negativne godišnje inkrementalne tokove do isteka Ugovora iz 2005.
Consequently, the transaction consisting of the 2005 agreements conferred an economic advantage on Ryanair/AMS.
Prema tome, transakcijom koja je proizašla iz Ugovora iz 2005. društvu Ryanair/AMS dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost.
This amendment did not therefore confer any additional advantage on Ryanair/AMS over and above that resulting from the 2005 agreements.
Tom izmjenom stoga nije dodijeljena dodatna prednost društvu Ryanair/AMS u odnosu na prednost koja proizlazi iz Ugovora iz 2005.
The amendment of 30 January 2006 does not therefore constitute State aid.
Stoga izmjena od 30. siječnja 2006. ne predstavlja državnu potporu.
It is clear from these explanations that an MEO operating Nîmes airport would have expected Ryanair to stop operating its four flights a week to Charleroi during the 2007-2008 winter season if this amendment had not been made.
Iz tih obrazloženja proizlazi da bi subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji upravlja Zračnom lukom Nîmes očekivao da će društvo Ryanair, bez sklapanja te izmjene, ukinuti svoja četiri leta tjedno prema Charleroiu tijekom zimske sezone 2007. – 2008.
This assumption would have been all the more plausible as the agreements of 2 January 2007 were due to expire on 31 October 2007 and VTAN therefore had no guarantee that Ryanair would continue to operate its service to Charleroi after that date.
Ta bi pretpostavka bila tim vjerojatnija jer su Ugovori od 2. siječnja 2007. istjecali 31. listopada 2007., a društvo VTAN nije imalo nikakvo jamstvo da će Ryanair nastaviti upravljati linijom prema Charleroiu i nakon tog datuma.
On 25 August 2009 VTAN signed two agreements (‘the agreements of 25 August 2009’) with Ryanair and AMS, in the form of amendments extending until 31 December 2011 the application of the agreements of 27 August 2008, which were due to expire on 1 November 2009.
Društvo VTAN je 25. kolovoza 2009. s društvima Ryanair i AMS sklopilo dva ugovora („Ugovori od 25. kolovoza 2009.”) u obliku izmjena kojima se do 31. prosinca 2011. produljuje primjena Ugovora od 27. kolovoza 2008., koji su istekli 1. studenoga 2009.
In the absence of the agreements of 25 August 2009, Ryanair could have ceased all its operations at Nîmes.
Ryanair bi bez Ugovora od 25. kolovoza 2009. mogao prekinuti sve djelatnosti u Nîmesu.
The amendment of 18 August 2010 to the marketing services agreement of 27 August 2008 (‘the amendment of 18 August 2010’) provided for an exceptional increase of EUR [20000-50000] in the marketing payments made by VTAN under the terms of the marketing services agreement of 27 August 2008, extended by the amendment of 25 August 2009.
Izmjenom od 18. kolovoza 2010. Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 27. kolovoza 2008. („izmjena od 18. kolovoza 2010.”) jednokratno su povećana plaćanja za marketing društva VTAN za [20000 – 50000] EUR u odnosu na uvjete Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 27. kolovoza 2008. koji je produljen izmjenom od 25. kolovoza 2009.
This increase was not a condition for any undertaking by Ryanair in terms of opening new routes, increasing frequencies, not closing routes or not reducing frequencies.
To povećanje nije bilo uvjetovano nikakvom obvezom društva Ryanair da otvori nove linije, poveća broj letova, da ne zatvori linije ili ne smanji broja letova.
The amendment of 30 November 2010 to the marketing services agreement of 27 August 2008 (‘the amendment of 30 November 2010’) provided for an exceptional increase of EUR 50000 in the marketing payments made by VTAN under the terms of the marketing services agreement of 27 August 2008, extended by the amendment of 25 August 2009.
Izmjenom od 30. studenoga 2010. Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 27. kolovoza 2008. („izmjena od 30. studenoga 2010.”) jednokratno su povećana plaćanja za marketing društva VTAN za 50000 EUR u odnosu na uvjete Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 27. kolovoza 2008. koji je produljen izmjenom od 25. kolovoza 2009.
On reading the amendment of 30 November 2010, the email exchanges between Ryanair and VTAN that gave rise to this amendment, and the explanations provided by France, it appears that Ryanair made the operation of three weekly services instead of two on the Nîmes-Liverpool route during the 2011 summer season conditional upon the additional marketing payment of EUR [35000-65000]. An email from a Ryanair representative to a VTAN representative dated 29 November 2010 indicates in particular: ‘Yes the […] frequencies will be there for […] and in return you will give us the […]’.
Iz izmjene od 30. studenoga 2010., elektroničke pošte između društava Ryanair i VTAN na temelju kojih je došlo do te izmjene te i iz obrazloženja Francuske proizlazi da je društvo Ryanair uvjetovalo upravljanje trima tjednim letovima umjesto dvama na liniji Nîmes – Liverpool tijekom ljetne sezone 2011. dodatnim plaćanjem za marketing od [35000 – 65000] EUR. U elektroničkoj pošti predstavnika društva Ryanair predstavniku društva VTAN od 29. studenoga 2010. bilo je, među ostalim, navedeno sljedeće: „Da, uvest ćemo […] let za […], a u zamjenu ćete nam dati […]”.
However, these guidelines did not specifically deal with the issue of operating aid aimed at promoting outbound air traffic from regional airports.
Komisija je donijela smjernice iz 1994.. Međutim, u tim smjernicama nije pridana posebna pozornost problematici operativnih potpora čiji je cilj promidžba zračnog prometa s polaskom iz regionalnih zračnih luka.
The facts on record do not suggest that the operation of a second daily flight to London during a summer season was, between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002 or in 2004, likely to become profitable without aid.
Iz elemenata iz spisa ne proizlazi da je od kraja 2001. do početka 2002. te 2004. upravljanje drugim svakodnevnim letom prema Londonu tijekom ljetne sezone moglo postati profitabilno.
In fact it appears that the aid in question was granted so that this second flight could be operated on a limited basis for a single season, and not with a view to its operation continuing during subsequent summer seasons.
Naime, očito je da su predmetne potpore dodijeljene da bi se tim drugim letom upravljalo jednokratno, tijekom samo jedne sezone, a ne kako bi se zadržao tijekom sljedećih ljetnih sezona.
According to France, the CCI stresses that its first contacts with Ryanair were made in 1997, which resulted in an initial route — Nîmes-London Stansted — being launched in June 2000.
Prema mišljenju Francuske, komora CCI ističe da je prvi kontakt s društvom Ryanair uspostavila 1997. koji je u lipnju 2000. doveo do otvaranja prve linije, Nîmes – London Stansted.
After the TGV’s arrival in Nîmes in mid-2001, and after the withdrawal of the Paris-Nîmes route operated by Air France, the CCI apparently sought to continue this route and made contact with Air Littoral, which took over the service until July 2003.
Nakon dolaska linije vlaka velikih brzina u Nîmes sredinom 2001. i nakon zatvaranja linije Pariz – Nîmes kojom je upravljao Air France, komora CCI nastojala je zadržati tu liniju te je uspostavila kontakt s društvom Air Littoral koje je nastavilo upravljati tom linijom do srpnja 2003.
As regards the amendment of 1 August 2007, France has confirmed that this was a condition for the Ryanair service to Charleroi to be maintained for the 2007-2008 winter season.
U pogledu izmjene od 1. kolovoza 2007., Francuska je potvrdila da je njome uvjetovano zadržavanje linije društva Ryanair prema Charleroiu tijekom zimske sezone 2007.
It was not therefore linked with the opening of a new route or new frequencies.
2008. Stoga ona nije bila povezana s otvaranjem nove linije ili novih letova.
Likewise, the agreements of 27 August 2008 concerned only two routes out of the four covered by the previous agreements (London and Charleroi), with identical frequencies to those provided for in the agreements of 1 November 2007.
Usto, Ugovori od 27. kolovoza 2008. odnosili se samo na dvije od četiri linije obuhvaćene prethodnim ugovorima (London i Charleroi) s istim brojem letova koji je bio predviđen Ugovorima od 1. studenoga 2007.
The 2009 amendments, which simply extended those agreements, also did not provide for the opening of new routes or additional frequencies.
Ni izmjenama iz 2009., kojima su samo produženi ti Ugovori, nisu otvorene dodatne linije ni letovi.
France has provided emails of 23 and 29 November 2010, exchanged between Ryanair and VTAN, which prove that Ryanair was threatening to withdraw two flights from this route (reducing the number of flights from four to two) and was making the continued operation of these flights for summer 2011 (period from March 2011 to October 2011) conditional upon the purchase of additional marketing services to help promote this route, in an amount of EUR [35000-65000].
Francuska je dostavila e-poštu između društava Ryanair i VTAN od 23. i 29. studenoga 2010. kojom je dokazano da je Ryanair prijetio da će ukinuti dva leta na toj liniji (smanjiti s četiri na dva leta) te je zadržavanje tih letova ljeti 2011.
In the absence of this exceptional increase in the contribution, Ryanair might have ceased operating the route to Liverpool.
(razdoblje od ožujka do listopada 2011.) uvjetovao kupnjom dodatnih marketinških usluga kako bi pridonio promidžbi te linije iznosom od [35000 – 65000] EUR. U nedostatku jednokratnog povećanja doprinosa, Ryanair je mogao prekinuti upravljanje linijom prema Liverpoolu.
Given all the above, the Commission considers that none of the unlawful aid granted to Ryanair/AMS through the agreements covered by this investigation meets all the criteria established by the 2005 Guidelines.
S obzirom na sve prethodno iznesene elemente, Komisija smatra da nijedna od nezakonito dodijeljenih potpora društvu Ryanair/AMS putem ugovora koji su predmet ovog ispitivanja ne ispunjava kriterije predviđene smjernicama iz 2005.
Accordingly, the aid resulting from the following measures is incompatible with the internal market:
Tako su potpore koje proizlaze iz sljedećih mjera nespojive s unutarnjim tržištem:
France has also argued that the development of the air traffic task entrusted to VTAN through the CDSP ‘can be regarded as a public service obligation within the meaning of the Altmark case-law’.
Nadalje, Francuska je podržala tezu da se zadatak razvoja zračnog prometa, povjeren ugovorom CDSP društvu VTAN, „može smatrati obvezom pružanja javne usluge u smislu sudske prakse iz predmeta Altmark”.
According to France, this task concerns the ‘economic and tourism development of the area’, which requires, in its opinion, ‘(i) an increase in passenger flows, generating income and jobs for the regional economy …; and (ii) the development of the enterprise zone situated adjacent to the airport’.
Francuska smatra da se taj se zadatak odnosi na „gospodarski i turistički razvoj područja” koji zahtijeva, prema mišljenju Francuske, „(i.) povećanje priljeva putnika, što stvara prihode i nova radna mjesta u regionalnom gospodarstvu […] i (ii.) razvoj poslovne zone kraj Zračne luke”.
As regards this enterprise zone, France refers to several undertakings established there and indicates that ‘Within this industrial hub, VTAN has the task of developing aviation-related activities and building the industrial or commercial activity that can generate jobs for the area’.
U pogledu te poslovne zone, Francuska navodi više poduzetnika koji ondje posluju i napominje da „Kada je riječ o tom industrijskom središtu, društvo VTAN ima zadatak razvijati djelatnosti povezane sa zrakoplovstvom te ojačati industrijsku i trgovačku djelatnost kojom se stvaraju nova radna mjesta u području”.
It should be noted that the CCI-Airport’s tasks for the period from 2000 to February 2006 were specified in the 1965 Order and its annexed schedule of conditions and in the 1986 AOT.
Valja napomenuti da su zadatci odjela CCI-zračna luka od 2000. do veljače 2006. utvrđeni u Odluci iz 1965. i u priloženoj specifikaciji te u odluci AOT iz 1986.
However, these acts did not provide for any financial compensation mechanism for the CCI, based on parameters established in advance in an objective and transparent manner.
Međutim, tim aktima nije predviđen mehanizam financijskih naknada u korist komore CCI na temelju parametara koji su naprijed utvrđeni na objektivan i transparentan način.
France has indicated, for example, that on 20 September 2006 Veolia Transport made further proposals over and above its initial tender, in the light of information contained in the SMAN’s letter of 6 September 2006.
Naime, Francuska je, na primjer, navela da je društvo Veolia Transport 20. rujna 2006. dostavilo dodatne prijedloge u dopunu svoje početne ponude u odnosu na elemente iz dopisa sindikata SMAN od 6. rujna 2006.
Moreover, on 4 October 2006 Veolia Transport submitted a series of clarifications amending essential elements of its tender, such as (i) introducing a ‘downturn scenario’ leading to a change in the flat-rate contribution if the airport’s activity were to be reduced; (ii) changing the formulas stipulated for updating the general balance of the delegation; or even (iii) amending the undertakings made with regard to staff costs.
Usto, društvo Veolia Transport je 4. listopada 2006. iznijelo niz pojašnjenja kojima je izmijenilo ključne elemente svoje ponude, poput (i.) uvođenja „rezervnog scenarija” kojim je izmijenjen paušalni doprinos u slučaju smanjenja djelatnosti Zračne luke, (ii.) izmjene formula predviđenih za diskontiranje prihoda strukture prenesenih ovlasti ili (iii.) izmjene obveza preuzetih u pogledu troškova osoblja.
The same was true of the subsidy of EUR 200000 granted to the CCI-Airport by the CCI’s general arm in 2006.
Isto vrijedi i za subvenciju od 200000 EUR koju je opći odjel komore CCI 2006. dodijelio odjelu CCI-zračna luka.
This non-repayable subsidy was in fact granted in order to finance the operating deficit that the CCI-Airport was facing in the final year of the period during which it operated the airport, and there was consequently no prospect of profitability for the CCI’s general arm.
Ta su bespovratna sredstva dodijeljena, naime, za financiranje operativnog manjka s kojim se odjel CCI-zračna luka suočio posljednje godine svoga upravljanja Zračnom lukom i prema tome opći odjel komore CCI nije imao nikakva izgleda za profitabilnost.
Moreover, as proven above, even if all or part of the management of Nîmes airport could have been validly defined as an SGEI, none of the financial support measures covered by this assessment stemmed from a financial compensation mechanism for which the parameters were established in advance in an objective and transparent manner, accompanied by parameters for calculating, controlling and reviewing the compensation and arrangements for avoiding and repaying any overcompensation.
Usto, kao što je prethodno dokazano, čak i kad bi se upravljanje Zračnom lukom Nîmes moglo, djelomično ili u cijelosti, valjano smatrati uslugom od općega gospodarskog interesa, nijedna mjera financijske potpore koja je bila predmet ovog ispitivanja nije proizašla iz mehanizma financijske naknade čiji su parametri unaprijed utvrđeni na objektivan i transparentan način, s pripadajućim načinima kontrole i revizije naknade te načinima povrata eventualnih prekomjernih naknada i načinima za njihovo izbjegavanje.
As a result, the measures in question do not satisfy the cumulative conditions established by the European Union framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, which is applicable to this case ratione temporis.
Stoga predmetne mjere ne ispunjavaju kumulativne uvjete utvrđene Okvirom Europske unije za državne potpore u obliku naknade za javne usluge koji će na ovaj slučaj biti primjenjiv ratione temporis.
Moreover, for the same reasons and as proven in recitals 633 to 635, the measures in question also do not satisfy the cumulative conditions established by the 2005 SGEI Decision.
Usto, iz tih istih razloga i kao što je utvrđeno u uvodnim izjavama od 633. do 635., predmetne mjere ne zadovoljavaju ni kumulativne uvjete utvrđene u Odluci o uslugama od općega gospodarskog interesa iz 2005.
Consequently, these measures cannot be declared compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 106(2) TFEU.
Prema tome, te mjere ne mogu biti ocijenjene spojivima s unutarnjim tržištem na temelju članka 106. stavka 2. UFEU-a.
As already indicated, the airport recorded a very large operating deficit every year during the 2002-2011 period.
Kao što je već navedeno, Zračna luke je svake godine u razdoblju od 2002. do 2011. bilježila vrlo veliki operativni manjak.