natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, as regards the condition in the sales contract between the sellers and Capricorn which foresees that the sale of the Nürburgring assets is final only upon the existence of a non-challengeable Commission decision declaring that the aid would not be recovered from the buyer of the assets, the Commission notes that, according to the provisions included in the relevant parts of complainant 3's mark-up contracts, as submitted by the insolvency administrators and Germany, the purchaser and/or the seller had the right to withdraw from the contract if no positive decision of the Commission had been issued by 15 July 2014 (as stipulated in draft contract of 14 January 2014) or 31 December 2014 (as stipulated in draft mark-up contract of 14 February 2014).
U pogledu uvjeta izvršenja kupoprodajnog ugovora koji su sklopili prenositelji i Capricorn, u skladu s kojima se otuđenje imovine Nürburgringa provodi tek ako postoji pravomoćna odluka Komisije u kojoj je utvrđeno da se od preuzimatelja imovine neće tražiti povrat potpore, Komisija je utvrdila da su, u skladu s odredbama iz relevantnih dijelova komentara trećeg podnositelja pritužbe na ugovor koje su dostavili stečajni upravitelji i Njemačka, preuzimatelj i prenositelji mogli odustati od ugovora da do 15. lipnja 2014. (u skladu s nacrtom ugovora od 14. siječnja 2014.) odnosno do 31. prosinca 2014.
It is also noted that there was no time limit as to exercising such withdrawal right.
(u skladu s nacrtom ugovora od 14. veljače 2014.) Komisija nije donijela pozitivnu odluku. Nije postojao rok za to pravo na odustajanje.
As regards further allegations made by complainant 3, the Commission notes the following:
U pogledu ostalih tvrdnji trećeg podnositelja pritužbe Komisija je utvrdila sljedeće:
The Commission does not consider that complainant 3 was required to assume the existing contracts or obligations of NBG (with the exception of contracts that transfer automatically by operation of law, such as certain employment or rental contracts).
Komisija ne smatra da je treći podnositelj pritužbe morao preuzeti postojeće ugovore ili obveze NBG-a (osim ugovora koji se prenose na temelju zakona, kao što su ugovori o radu ili ugovori o najmu).
Moreover, the Commission has not found evidence that there had been an alteration in the transaction concept during the tender process, or that except for complainant 3 another bidder has complained about an alleged change of the transaction structure.
Osim toga, Komisija nije utvrdila nikakve naznake da se koncept otuđenja promijenio tijekom natječajnog postupka ili da su se drugi ponuditelji uz trećeg podnositelja pritužbe žalili na navodnu izmjenu strukture transakcije.
In fact, the latter absence of complaints by other bidders was communicated to complainant 3 with KPMG's letter of 11 December 2013.
Dopisom KPMG-a od 11. prosinca 2013. treći podnositelj pritužbe obaviješten je da nijedan drugi ponuditelj nije podnio pritužbu.
The duration of the tender process was not excessively long.
Natječajni postupak nije predugo trajao.
By letter of 17 December 2013, complainant 3 was informed by the sellers about the deadline of 17 February 2014 for the submission of a confirmatory bid.
Dopisom od 17. prosinca 2013. prenositelji su obavijestili trećeg podnositelja pritužbe o roku za dostavljanje konačne ponude koji traje do 17. veljače 2014.
Complainant 3 was also informed that the sellers might choose the parties qualified for the further process shortly after the end of that extended deadline.
Nadalje je obaviješten o tome da će prenositelji vjerojatno ubrzo nakon isteka produljenog roka odabrati ponuditelje koji su ispunili uvjete.
The qualified bidders were not hindered from amending their confirmatory bids or to submit the proof of their financing even after that deadline, as long as no definite asset purchase agreement had been signed [180].
Ponuditelji koji su ispunili uvjete mogli su izmijeniti svoje konačne ponude ili dostaviti svoj dokaz o financiranju nakon isteka tog roka, sve dok nije potpisan konačni kupoprodajni ugovor [180].
There is no evidence that Capricorn negotiated with a beer supplier or with ‘Rock am Ring’ before the conclusion of the asset purchase agreement.
Ne postoji dokaz da je Capricorn prije sklapanja kupoprodajnog ugovora pregovarao s dobavljačem piva ili s festivalom „Rock am Ring”.
According to the insolvency administrators, it was NBG which conducted all relevant negotiations.
Stečajni upravitelji navode da je NBG vodio sve relevantne pregovore.
The notarisation of the asset purchase agreement by the two best bidders (Capricorn and [Bidder 2]) carried out before the meeting of the creditors' committee of 11 March 2014 is not an indicator of a breach of the principles of transparency and equal treatment.
Ovjeravanje kupoprodajnog ugovora dvaju najuspješnijih ponuditelja (grupe Capricorn i [drugog ponuditelja]) kod javnog bilježnika 11. ožujka 2014. ne upućuje na kršenje načela transparentnosti i jednakog postupanja.
There is no evidence that Capricorn was notified of the result of the tender process before the meeting of the creditors' committee took place on 11 March 2014.
Ne postoji dokaz da je Capricorn prije sjednice odbora vjerovnika od 11. ožujka 2014. obaviješten o rezultatu natječajnog postupka.
None of the bidders has provided a financing guarantee for the entire purchase price.
Nijedan ponuditelj nije dostavio jamstvo financiranja za cijeli iznos kupovne cijene.
The sellers have therefore not breached the principle of equal treatment by making de facto the requirement of secure financing less strict during the tender process.
Stoga prenositelji nisu prekršili načelo jednakog postupanja kad su manje strogo primjenjivali zahtjev u pogledu sigurnosti financiranja tijekom natječajnog postupka.
The provision of a mark-up of the asset purchase agreement was part of commercial negotiation and is not a matter relevant from the State aid point of view.
Dostavljanje komentara uz kupoprodajni ugovor bilo je dio pregovora o poslu i nije važno u kontekstu pravila o državnim potporama.
The considerations of environmental aspects of complainant 3's offer by the sellers were carried out only in respect to the fact that complainant 3 had not submitted a proof of the financing of his bid.
Prenositelji su ponudu trećeg podnositelja pritužbe razmatrali s obzirom na ekološka pravila samo zato što on za svoju ponudu nije osigurao financiranje.
Such considerations were not part of the criteria for the selection of the successful bidder. These considerations therefore had no impact on the result of the tender process.
Takva razmatranja nisu bila sastavni dio kriterija za odabir uspješnog ponuditelja i stoga nisu utjecala na rezultat natječajnog postupka.
that lawyer worked for the Land from May 2012 until April 2013, i.e. before the initiation of the tender process in June 2013;
taj je odvjetnik od svibnja 2012. do travnja 2013. radio za saveznu pokrajinu Rheinland-Pfalz, tj. prije početka natječajnog postupka u lipnju 2013.;
that lawyer was not in any contact with the Land or the Federal Republic of Germany during the tender process;
taj odvjetnik tijekom natječajnog postupka nije bio u kontaktu ni sa saveznom pokrajinom Rheinland-Pfalz ni sa Saveznom Republikom Njemačkom;
that lawyer never advised the Land or the sellers in relation to the bidding process;
taj odvjetnik nikad nije savjetovao saveznu pokrajinu Rheinland-Pfalz i prenositelje u pogledu natječajnog postupka;
and (d) the same lawyer only participated as an independent expert in the hearing of the Land's parliament on 20 June 2013 concerning the law for the public access to the Nürburgring racetrack.
isti je odvjetnik sudjelovao u saslušanju vlade pokrajine Rheinland-Pfalz 20. lipnja 2013. u pogledu Zakona o javnom pristupu trkaćoj stazi Nürburgring samo kao neovisni stručnjak.
Furthermore, Germany has explained that the State aid aspects of the tender, i.e. the fact that the tender process had to be open, transparent, unconditional and non-discriminatory, in order for the buyer not to be liable for any recovery of incompatible State aid to the sellers of the Nürburgring assets, were already made aware to all bidders, as follows:
Osim toga, Njemačka je uputila na to da su svi ponuditelji upoznati s aspektima natječajnog postupka u pogledu pravila o državnim potporama, tj. s činjenicom da je natječajni postupak morao biti otvoren, transparentan, bezuvjetan i nediskriminirajući, kako preuzimatelj ne bi morao odgovarati za eventualni povrat državnih potpora za preuzimatelje Nürburgringa koje su nespojive s unutarnjim tržištem, i to na sljedeći način:
through the Commission decisions to open the formal investigation procedure on 21 March 2012 and to extend it on 7 August 2012;
odlukama Komisije od 21. ožujka 2012. (pokretanje službenog istražnog postupka) i od 7. kolovoza 2012.
The Commission therefore rejects the complaint from complainant 3 as unjustified because the assets in question have been sold to the bidder who submitted the highest bid including a proof of its financing, following an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process.
Komisija stoga odbacuje pritužbu trećeg podnositelja pritužbe kao neosnovanu jer je predmetna imovina prenesena na onog ponuditelja koji je u okviru otvorenog, transparentnog, nediskriminirajućeg i bezuvjetnog natječajnog postupka dostavio najvišu ponudu, uključujući dokaz o financiranju.
Complaint from complainant 4
Pritužba četvrtog podnositelja pritužbe
According to the comparison included in Table 10, the bid from Capricorn leads to a higher revenue from the sale in comparison to the bid from [Bidder 2]
Na temelju usporedbe u tablici 10. ponudom grupe Capricorn ostvaruju se viši prihodi od otuđenja, nego ponudom [drugog ponuditelja].
As regards the allegations made by complainant 4, the Commission notes the following:
U pogledu tvrdnji četvrtog podnositelja pritužbe Komisija je utvrdila sljedeće:
The Commission takes note of the insolvency administrators' statement that the financing of the two offers submitted by [Bidder 2] and Capricorn was sufficiently secure for the sellers, even though none of both offers reached the highest possible level of security.
Komisija prima na znanje objašnjenje stečajnog upravitelja da se ponudama [drugog ponuditelja] i grupe Capricorn za prenositelje nudi dovoljna sigurnost financiranja, čak i ako se nijednom od tih dviju ponuda ne ostvaruje najveća moguća sigurnost.
By letter dated 24 February 2014, [Bidder 2] informed the sellers about the financial capability of the [Bidder 2] group, indicating that around EUR [930-1030] million are available for investment.
Dopisom od 24. veljače 2014.
The Commission also notes that by its financing commitment dated 10 March 2014 […] established a loan facility with an aggregate maximum debt commitment equal to the amount of EUR [41-49] million to the benefit of Capricorn.
[drugi ponuditelj] obavijestio je prenositelje o financijskim kapacitetima grupe [drugog ponuditelja] i izjavio da za ulaganje ima na raspolaganju oko [930 – 1030] milijuna EUR. Komisija nadalje uzima u obzir da je […] svojom potvrdom o financiranju od 10. ožujka 2014. opravdao kreditni instrument kojim je grupi Capricorn osigurano vanjsko financiranje u iznosu od najviše [41 – 49] milijuna EUR.
As regards the up-front payments, if a non-challengeable Commission decision exists in 2014, the sellers would have access to EUR [30-33] million in case of [Bidder 2] or EUR [58-63] million (plus around EUR 6 million of cash flow of NBG) in case of Capricorn.
U pogledu plaćanja unaprijed prenositelji bi u slučaju postojanja pravomoćne odluke Komisije 2014. na temelju ponude [drugog ponuditelja] imali pristup iznosu od [30 – 33] milijuna EUR, a na temelju ponude grupe Capricorn iznosu od [58 – 63] milijuna EUR (uvećanom za oko 6 milijuna EUR iz novčanog toka NBG-a).
Taking account of the comments made by complainant 4 and the insolvency administrators, on balance, it is not evident that the execution risk was higher for Capricorn's offer compared to [Bidder 2]'s offer.
S obzirom na tvrdnje četvrtog podnositelja pritužbe i stečajnih upravitelja, ukupno gledano, ne može se utvrditi da je rizik provedbe u slučaju ponude grupe Capricorn bio veći nego u slučaju ponude [drugog ponuditelja].
In view of the selection criteria indicated in recital 48, the capability of the bidders as such was not a selection criterion.
U skladu s kriterijima za odabir navedenima u uvodnoj izjavi 48. kapacitet ponuditelja nije bio kriterij za odabir.
In view of the selection criteria indicated in recital 48, the amount of investment to be made after the sale was not a selection criterion.
U skladu s kriterijima za odabir navedenima u uvodnoj izjavi 48. iznos ulaganja nakon otuđenja nije bio kriterij za odabir.
The sellers communicated with [Bidder 2] to an acceptable standard during the tender process.
Komunikacija prenositelja s [drugim ponuditeljem] tijekom natječajnog postupka bila je prihvatljiva.
[Bidder 2] was not hindered from increasing or modifying his bid until the meeting of the creditors' committee took place on 11 March 2014.
[Drugi ponuditelj] mogao je poboljšati ili izmijeniti svoju ponudu do sjednice odbora vjerovnika 11. ožujka 2014.
The Commission has thus not found evidence proving that [Bidder 2] was discriminated in the tender process.
Komisija, prema tome, nije našla dokaz za diskriminaciju [drugog ponuditelja] u natječajnom postupku.
The claim about a worse treatment of [Bidder 2] in comparison to other bidders including Capricorn is unjustified.
Optužba da se s [drugim ponuditeljem] postupalo lošije nego s ostalim ponuditeljima, uključujući Capricorn, stoga nije opravdana.
It has to be noted that [Bidder 2] submitted a confirmatory offer, it negotiated the terms of the contract, and as the second best bidder with secured financing, [Bidder 2] was allowed to sign the final version of the draft contract.
U tom je pogledu potrebno uputiti na to da je [drugi ponuditelj] dostavio konačnu ponudu, da je pregovarao o ugovoru i kao drugi najuspješniji ponuditelj s osiguranim financiranjem mogao je potpisati konačni nacrt ugovora.
In addition, as regards the condition of a non-enforceable Commission decision, apart from an amount of EUR [7,1-7,6] million, the money provided by [Bidder 2] would be kept in a blocked account and transferred to the sellers either upon the existence of a non-challengeable Commission decision or if the buyer did not withdraw from the contract despite there being no such enforceable Commission decision by 31 March 2015 (the possibility to extend the period for the withdrawal right was not excluded)
U pogledu kriterija iz pravomoćne odluke Komisije potrebno je uputiti na to da su sredstva koja je [drugi ponuditelj] stavio na raspolaganje, uz iznimku tranše od [7,1 – 7,6] milijuna EUR, trebala ostati na blokiranom računu i, u slučaju postojanja pravomoćne odluke Komisije ili u slučaju da preuzimatelj ne odustane od ugovora ni u slučaju nepostojanja pravomoćne odluke Komisije (pri čemu nije bilo isključeno produljenje roka za odustajanje), prenesena prenositeljima do 31. ožujka 2015.
The Commission therefore rejects the complaint from complainant 4 as unjustified because the assets in question have been sold to the bidder who submitted the highest bid including a proof of its financing, following an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process.
Komisija stoga odbija pritužbu četvrtog podnositelja pritužbe kao neosnovanu jer je predmetna imovina prenesena na onog ponuditelja koji je u okviru otvorenog, transparentnog, nediskriminirajućeg i bezuvjetnog natječajnog postupka dostavio najvišu ponudu, uključujući dokaz o financiranju.
For the reasons set out above, on the basis of the available information, the Commission has not found evidence of a breach of the principles of an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and non-conditional tender process with regards to the sale of the assets of NG, MSR and CMHN, or of any offer with a higher price bid with secured financing compared to the price bid made by Capricorn.
Zbog navedenih razloga i na temelju dostupnih informacija Komisija nije pronašla dokaz da je prekršeno načelo otvorenog, transparentnog, nediskriminirajućeg i bezuvjetnog natječajnog postupka za otuđenje imovine NG-a, MSR-a i CMHN-a ili da postoji ponuda s osiguranim financiranjem koja je viša od ponuđene cijene grupe Capricorn.
The Commission finds that part of measure 2 (loans granted to FSZ), as well as measures 8, 11 and 15 do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1).
Komisija je utvrdila da dio mjere 2. (zajam FSZ-u) te mjere 8., 11. i 15. ne predstavljaju državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
The Commission finds that Germany has unlawfully implemented measure 1, part of measure 2 (loans granted by NG to EWN, MAN, TTI, Camp4Fun, BWN1, BWNB and BWN2), as well as measures 3 to 7, 9 and 10, 12 to 14, and 16 to 19 in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Komisija je utvrdila da je Njemačka mjeru 1., dio mjere 2. (zajam NG-a za EWN, MAN, TTI, Camp4Fun, BWN1, BWNB i BWN2) te mjere 3. do 7., 9. i 10., 12. do 14. i 16. do 19. provela nezakonito i time prekršila članak 108. stavak 3. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
The Commission has also concluded that:
Komisija nadalje donosi sljedeći zaključak:
Thus, any potential recovery of incompatible State aid will not concern capricorn NÜRBURGRING Besitzgesellschaft GmbH, the buyer of the assets sold following the tender process, or its subsidiaries,
Stoga se eventualni povrat potpora nespojivih s unutarnjim tržištem ne odnosi na društvo Capricorn NÜRBURGRING Besitzgesellschaft GmbH, na koje je prenesena imovina otuđena u okviru natječajnog postupka, ili na njegova društva kćeri,
The following measures which Germany has implemented do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:
Sljedeće mjere koje je Njemačka poduzela ne predstavljaju državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. UFEU-a:
Part of measure 2
dio mjere 2.
the loans in the total amount of EUR 646738,12 granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Fahrsicherheitszentrum am Nürburgring GmbH & Co. KG between 12 April 2002 and March 2008,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 646738,12 EUR koje je društvu Fahrsicherheitszentrum am Nürburgring GmbH & Co. KG odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 12. travnja 2002. do ožujka 2008.;
Measure 8
mjera 8.
Measure 11
mjera 11.
Measure 15
mjera 15.
the transfer of 49,5 % of shares of Motorsport Resort Nürburgring GmbH from Mediinvest GmbH to Nürburgring GmbH for the price in the amount of EUR 1 carried out on 25 March 2010,
prijenos 49,5 % udjela u društvu Motorsport Resort Nürburgring GmbH s društva Mediinvest GmbH na Nürburgring GmbH po cijeni od 1 EUR 25. ožujka 2010.;
the transfer of 33,8 % of shares of Motorsport Resort Nürburgring GmbH from Geisler & Trimmel General Contractor GmbH to Nürburgring GmbH for the price in the amount of EUR 1 carried out on 25 March 2010,
prijenos 33,8 % udjela u društvu Motorsport Resort Nürburgring GmbH s društva Geisler & Trimmel General Contractor GmbH na Nürburgring GmbH po cijeni od 1 EUR 25. ožujka 2010.;
The following State aid, unlawfully put into effect by Germany through the measures listed below, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is incompatible with the internal market: The State aid granted in the form of:
Sljedeće državne potpore koje je Njemačka nezakonito provela u obliku mjera navedenih u nastavku uz kršenje članka 108. stavka 3. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije nisu spojive s unutarnjim tržištem:
Measure 1
mjera 1.
the capital in the form of transfers to the capital reserve granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate to Nürburgring GmbH in the amounts of EUR 2179000 on 1 May 2002 and EUR 22839241 on 21 December 2004,
kapital u obliku izdvajanja za kapitalne rezerve koje je savezna pokrajina Rheinland-Pfalz odobrila društvu Nürburgring GmbH 1. svibnja 2002. u iznosu od 2179000 EUR i 21. prosinca 2004. u iznosu od 22839241 EUR;
the capital in the form of increases of own capital provided to Nürburgring GmbH by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate in the amounts of EUR 4398300 on 31 August 2004 and EUR 9000000 on 4 September 2007 and by the district of Ahrweiler in the amounts of EUR 488700 on 31 August 2004 and EUR 1000000 on 4 September 2007,
kapital u obliku povećanja kapitala koje je društvu Nürburgring GmbH odobrila pokrajina Rheinland-Pfalz 31. kolovoza 2004. u iznosu od 4398300 EUR i 4. rujna 2007. u iznosu od 9000000 EUR te koje mu je okrug Ahrweiler odobrio 31. kolovoza 2004. u iznosu od 488700 EUR i 4. rujna 2007. u iznosu od 1000000 EUR;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Erlebnispark Nürburgring GmbH & Co. KG in the total amount of EUR 6195170,02 between 1 January 2006 and 29 April 2009,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 6195170,02 EUR koje je društvu Erlebnispark Nürburgring GmbH & Co. KG odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 1. siječnja 2006. do 29. travnja 2009.;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Motorsport Akademie Nürburgring GmbH & Co. KG in the amount of EUR 100000 on 10 December 2002,
zajmovi u iznosu od 100000 EUR koje je društvu Motorsport Akademie Nürburgring GmbH & Co. KG 10. prosinca 2002. odobrio Nürburgring GmbH;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Test & Training International GmbH in the amount of EUR 25000 on 15 August 2002,
zajmovi u iznosu od 25000 EUR koje je društvu Test & Training International GmbH 15. kolovoza 2002. odobrio Nürburgring GmbH;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Camp 4 Fun GmbH & Co. KG in the total amount of EUR 450000 between 26 May 2009 and 18 December 2009,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 450000 EUR koje je društvu Camp 4 Fun GmbH & Co. KG odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 26. svibnja 2009. do 18. prosinca 2009.;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to BikeWorld Nürburgring Besitz GmbH in the total amount of EUR 500000 between 17 October 2003 and 27 October 2004,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 500000 EUR koje je društvu BikeWorld Nürburgring Besitz GmbH odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 17. listopada 2003. do 27. listopada 2004.;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Bike World Nürburgring GmbH in the total amount of EUR 1660000 between 4 February 2004 and 22 July 2005,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 1660000 EUR koje je društvu BikeWorld Nürburgring Besitz GmbH odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 4. veljače 2004. do 22. srpnja 2005.;
the loans granted by Nürburgring GmbH to BikeWorld Nürburgring GmbH in the total amount of EUR 1600000 between 20 September 2005 and 4 April 2007,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 1600000 EUR koje je društvu BikeWorld Nürburgring Besitz GmbH odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 20. rujna 2005. do 4. travnja 2007.;
Measure 3
mjera 3.
the loans in the total amount of EUR 399805370 granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate to Nürburgring GmbH from 30 June 2003 to 11 May 2010,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 399805370 EUR koje je društvu Nürburgring GmbH od 30. lipnja 2003. do 11. svibnja 2010. odobrila savezna pokrajina Rheinland-Pfalz;
Measure 4
mjera 4.
the loan in the amount of EUR 300000 granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Motorsport Resort Nürburgring GmbH on 27 December 2007,
zajam u iznosu od 300000 EUR koji je društvu Motorsport Resort Nürburgring GmbH 27. prosinca 2007. odobrio Nürburgring GmbH;
Part of measure 5
dio mjere 5.
the loans in the total amount of EUR 11032060 granted by Nürburgring GmbH to Cash Settlement and Ticketing GmbH from 27 August 2008 to 18 April 2011,
zajmovi u ukupnom iznosu od 11032060 EUR koje je društvu Cash Settlement and Ticketing GmbH odobrio Nürburgring GmbH od 27. kolovoza 2008. do 18. travnja 2011.;
the letter of comfort provided by NG to CST on 23 December 2009, committing NG until 31 December 2011 to take measures that are necessary for preventing insolvency of CST,
mandatno pismo NG-a za CST od 23. prosinca 2009. u kojem se NG do 31. prosinca 2011. obvezao poduzeti mjere nužne kako bi se izbjegao stečaj CST-a;
the subordination of NG's claims against CST in the amount of EUR 10,4 million declared by NG on 13 December 2010,
podređenost koju je NG proglasio 13. prosinca 2010. u pogledu svojih potraživanja od CST-a u iznosu od 10,4 milijuna EUR;
Measure 6
mjera 6.