natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should therefore be concluded that RCCs and authorised clearing houses authorised in India are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
Stoga bi trebalo zaključiti da priznata društva koja se bave poravnanjem i priznate klirinške kuće s odobrenjem za rad u Indiji podliježu djelotvornom nadzoru i izvršenju na kontinuiranoj osnovi.
According to the third condition under Article 25(6) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the legal and supervisory arrangements of India must include an effective equivalent system for the recognition of CCPs authorised under third country legal regimes (‘third-country CCPs’).
U skladu s trećim uvjetom iz članka 25. stavka 6. Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 pravni i nadzorni sustavi Indije moraju uključivati djelotvoran istovrijedan sustav za priznavanje središnjih drugih ugovornih strana koje imaju odobrenje za rad u skladu s pravnim sustavima trećih zemalja („središnje druge ugovorne strane trećih zemalja”).
Third country CCPs may apply for authorisation as an ‘authorised clearing house’ under the RBI regime, which allows third country CCPs to provide the same clearing services as CCPs established in India.
Središnje druge ugovorne strane trećih zemalja mogu u skladu sa sustavom Središnje banke Indije zatražiti odobrenje kao „priznata klirinška kuća”, što im omogućuje pružanje istih usluga poravnanja koje mogu pružati središnje druge ugovorne strane s poslovnim nastanom u Indiji.
Third country CCPs can be exempted from certain requirements applicable to RCCs and authorised clearing houses in India, provided they comply with the PFMIs and a cooperation arrangement is concluded between the RBI and the third country supervisor.
Središnje druge ugovorne strane trećih zemalja mogu biti izuzete od određenih uvjeta koji se primjenjuju na priznata društva koja se bave poravnanjem i priznate klirinške kuće s odobrenjem za rad u Indiji ako poštuju načela za infrastrukture financijskih tržišta i ako je između Središnje banke Indije i nadzornog tijela treće zemlje sklopljen dogovor o suradnji.
The assessment of the application for authorisation can be based on the information provided by the third country supervisor.
Procjena zahtjeva za odobrenje može se temeljiti na informacijama koje je dostavilo nadzorno tijelo treće zemlje.
It should therefore be concluded that the legal and supervisory arrangements of India provide for an effective equivalent system for the recognition of third-country CCPs.
Stoga bi trebalo zaključiti da je pravnim i nadzornim sustavima Indije predviđen djelotvoran istovrijedan sustav priznavanja središnjih drugih ugovornih strana trećih zemalja.
This Decision is based on the legally binding requirements relating to RCCs and authorised clearing houses applicable in India at the time of the adoption of this Decision.
Ova se Odluka temelji na pravno obvezujućim zahtjevima koji se odnose na priznata društva koja se bave poravnanjem i priznate klirinške kuće te koji su primjenjivi u Indiji u trenutku donošenja ove Odluke.
The Commission, in cooperation with ESMA, should continue monitoring on a regular basis the evolution of the legal and supervisory framework for RCCs and authorised clearing houses and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this decision has been taken.
U suradnji s ESMA-om Komisija bi trebala nastaviti redovito pratiti razvoj pravnog i nadzornog okvira za priznate društva koja se bave poravnanjem i priznate klirinške kuće te ispunjavanje uvjeta na temelju kojih je donesena ova Odluka.
The regular review of the legal and supervisory arrangements applicable in India to CCPs authorised therein should be without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to undertake a specific review at any time outside the general review, where relevant developments make it necessary for the Commission to re-assess the equivalence granted by this Decision.
Redovitim preispitivanjem pravnih i nadzornih sustava koji se u Indiji primjenjuju na središnje druge ugovorne strane s odobrenjem za rad u toj trećoj zemlji ne bi se smjela dovoditi u pitanje mogućnost da Komisija bilo kada izvan razdoblja općeg preispitivanja provede posebno preispitivanje ako zbog relevantnih događanja mora ponovno procijeniti istovrijednost odobrenu ovom Odlukom.
For the purposes of paragraph 6 of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the legal and supervisory arrangements of India consisting of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956, the Securities Contract (Regulation) (Stock Exchange and Clearing Corporations) Regulations 2012 and the Circular of 4 September 2013 and applicable to recognised clearing corporations authorised therein shall be considered to be equivalent to the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Za potrebe članka 25. stavka 6. Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 pravni i nadzorni sustavi Indije koji se sastoje od Zakona o ugovorima za vrijednosne papire iz 1956., Uredbe o ugovorima za vrijednosne papire i Uredbe o burzama i društvima koje se bave poravnanjem iz 2012. (Uredbe) te od Okružnice od 4. rujna 2013. i koji se primjenjuju na priznate klirinške korporacije koje ondje imaju odobrenje, smatraju se istovrijednima zahtjevima utvrđenima Uredbom (EU) br. 648/2012.
For the purposes of paragraph 6 of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the legal and supervisory arrangements of India consisting of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and the Payment and Settlement Systems Regulations, 2008, as complemented by the Policy Document for Regulation and Supervision of Financial Market Infrastructures, and applicable to authorised clearing houses authorised therein shall be considered to be equivalent to the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Za potrebe članka 25. stavka 6. Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 pravni i nadzorni sustavi Indije koji se sastoje od Zakona o platnom sustavu i sustavu namire iz 2007. i Uredbi o platnom sustavu i sustavu namire iz 2008., kako su dopunjeni Dokumentom o politikama za uređenje i nadzor infrastruktura financijskih tržišta, i koji se primjenjuju na priznate klirinške kuće s odobrenjem za rad u toj trećoj zemlji, smatraju se istovrijednima zahtjevima utvrđenima Uredbom (EU) br. 648/2012.
As of 1 September 2014 the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems has changed its name to Committee on Payment and Market Infrastructures..
Od 1. rujna 2014.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2270
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2016/2270
on the equivalence of approved exchanges in Singapore in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o istovrijednosti odobrenih burzi u Singapuru u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 648/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 lays down clearing and bilateral risk-management requirements for over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivative contracts as well as reporting requirements for such contracts.
Uredbom (EU) br. 648/2012 utvrđuju se zahtjevi za poravnanje i bilateralno upravljanje rizicima za ugovore o OTC izvedenicama te izvještajni zahtjevi za te ugovore.
Point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 defines OTC derivatives as derivative contracts the execution of which does not take place on a regulated market within the meaning of point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and the of the Council [2] or on a third country market considered as equivalent to a regulated market in accordance with Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
U članku 2. točki 7. Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 OTC izvedenice definirane su kao ugovori o izvedenicama koji se ne izvršavaju na uređenom tržištu u smislu članka 4. stavka 1. točke 14. Direktive 2004/39/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [2] ili na tržištu treće zemlje koje se smatra istovrijednim uređenom tržištu u skladu s člankom 2.a Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012.
The purpose of this equivalence assessment is therefore to verify that the legally binding requirements which apply to approved exchanges in Singapore are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC, and that those markets are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
Stoga je svrha ove procjene istovrijednosti provjeriti jesu li pravno obvezujući zahtjevi koji se primjenjuju na odobrene burze u Singapuru istovrijedni zahtjevima iz glave III. Direktive 2004/39/EZ te podliježu li ta tržišta učinkovitom nadzoru i izvršenju na kontinuiranoj osnovi.
Markets which are approved exchanges on the date of adoption of this Decision should be therefore identified as markets considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Stoga se tržišta koja su odobrene burze na dan donošenja ove Odluke trebaju priznati kao tržišta koja se smatraju istovrijednima uređenom tržištu u smislu Direktive 2004/39/EZ.
The Singaporean legal framework for approved exchanges consists of the Securities and Futures Act (SFA), Securities and Futures (Markets) Regulations 2005, Securities and Futures (Corporate Governance of Approved Exchanges, Approved Clearing Houses and Approved Holding Companies) Regulations 2005, Securities and Futures (Offers of Investments) (Shares and Debentures) Regulations 2005, Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct of Business) Regulations 2004 and the Guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) pursuant to section 321 of the SFA, including the Guidelines on the Regulation of Markets No SFA 02-G01 and the Guidelines on Fit and Proper Criteria No FSG-G01.
Singapurski pravni okvir za odobrene burze čine Zakon o vrijednosnim papirima i budućnosnicama (Securities and Futures Act – SFA), propisi o vrijednosnim papirima i budućnosnicama iz 2005. koji se odnose na tržišta (Securities and Futures (Markets) Regulations 2005), na korporativno upravljanje odobrenim burzama, odobrene klirinške kuće i odobrena holding društva (Securities and Futures (Corporate Governance of Approved Exchanges, Approved Clearing Houses and Approved Holding Companies) Regulations 2005), na ponude za ulaganja te udjele i zadužnice (Securities and Futures (Offers of Investments) (Shares and Debentures) Regulations 2005), propisi o vrijednosnim papirima i budućnosnicama iz 2004. koji se odnose na licencije i poslovanje (Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct of Business) Regulations 2004) te smjernice koje je izdalo Monetarno tijelo Singapura (MTS) u skladu s odjeljkom 321. SFA-a, uključujući smjernice o uređenju tržišta br. SFA 02-G01 i smjernice o kriterijima stručnosti i primjerenosti br. FSG-G01.
The Guidelines on the Regulation of Markets set out obligations for the approved exchanges such as the obligation to operate a fair, orderly and transparent market.
U smjernicama o uređenju tržišta utvrđene su obveze odobrenih burza, primjerice obveza da se osigura pošteno, uredno i transparentno funkcioniranje tržišta.
Section 321(5) of the SFA sets out that failure to comply with any guidelines may, in any proceedings whether civil or criminal, be relied upon by any party seeking to establish or to negate any liability.
Odjeljkom 321. točkom 5. SFA-a utvrđuje se da stranke u svim građanskim ili kaznenim postupcima nepoštovanje smjernica mogu upotrijebiti kao osnovu za utvrđivanje ili poništavanje obveza.
In addition, section 334(1) and 335 empowers MAS to impose fines to the approved exchange where MAS finds out that the exchange is liable for contravention of any guidelines.
Osim toga, MTS je odjeljkom 334. točkom 1. i odjeljkom 335. ovlašten novčano kazniti odobrenu burzu ako ustanovi da je burza odgovorna za kršenje smjernica.
Furthermore, some business and listing rules that further detail SFA requirements are described in a rulebook for each approved exchange.
Nadalje, određena pravila o poslovanju i uvrštavanju kojima se iscrpnije utvrđuju zahtjevi SFA-a opisana su u pravilniku svake odobrene burze.
The business and listing rules, as well as any amendment of those rules, must be submitted to MAS prior to their implementation.
Pravila o poslovanju i uvrštavanju te sve njihove izmjene moraju se prije provedbe podnijeti MTS-u.
The SFA provides for penalties where the business or listing rules are not compliant with the requirements set out by MAS.
SFA-om su predviđene kazne u slučaju neusklađenosti pravila o poslovanju ili uvrštavanju sa zahtjevima MTS-a.
Under the SFA, business rules are deemed to be a binding contract for the approved exchange and its members and therefore must be observed and complied with on an ongoing basis.
U skladu sa SFA-om pravila poslovanja smatraju se obvezujućim ugovorom za odobrenu burzu i njezine članove te se stoga moraju stalno primjenjivati i poštovati.
The legally binding requirements applicable to approved exchanges in Singapore deliver substantive results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC in the following areas: authorisation process, definitional requirements, access to the approved exchange, organisational requirements, requirements for senior management, admission of financial instruments to trading, suspension and removal of instruments from trading, monitoring of compliance with the rules of the approved exchanges and access to clearing and settlement arrangements.
Pravno obvezujućim zahtjevima primjenjivima na odobrene burze u Singapuru ostvaruju se ishodi koji su u osnovi istovrijedni ishodima zahtjeva iz glave III. Direktive 2004/39/EZ u sljedećim područjima: postupak izdavanja odobrenja za rad, zahtjevi u pogledu definicija, pristup odobrenoj burzi, organizacijski zahtjevi, zahtjevi za više rukovodstvo, uvrštavanje financijskih instrumenata za trgovanje, suspenzija ili isključenje instrumenata iz trgovanja, praćenje usklađenosti s pravilima odobrenih burzi i pristup sustavima poravnanja i namire.
Despite shares can be admitted to trading on approved exchanges in Singapore, the Commission considers that the assessment of those requirements is however not relevant for the purposes of this Decision given that its objective is to verify the equivalence of the legally binding requirements applicable to third-country markets in respect of derivatives contracts that are executed on those markets.
Iako se dionice mogu uvrstiti za trgovanje na odobrenim burzama u Singapuru, Komisija međutim smatra da procjena tih zahtjeva nije relevantna za potrebe ove Odluke s obzirom na to da je njezin cilj provjeriti istovrijednost pravno obvezujućih zahtjeva koji se primjenjuju na tržišta trećih zemalja u pogledu ugovora o izvedenicama koji se izvršavaju na tim tržištima.
It should therefore be concluded that the legally binding requirements for approved exchanges in Singapore deliver results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Stoga bi trebalo zaključiti da se pravno obvezujućim zahtjevima za odobrene burze u Singapuru ostvaruju ishodi istovrijedni ishodima zahtjeva iz glave III. Direktive 2004/39/EZ.
The approved exchanges in Singapore are subject to supervision by MAS, a public authority established under section 3 of the Monetary Authority of Singapore Act.
Odobrene burze u Singapuru nadzire MTS, tijelo javne vlasti osnovano na temelju odjeljka 3. Zakona o Monetarnom tijelu Singapura.
MAS is the primary regulator for capital market activities in Singapore.
MTS je glavni regulator za djelatnosti tržišta kapitala u Singapuru.
Section 46 of the SFA empowers MAS to issue directions to the approved exchange in relation to specific matters as specified by the SFA to ensure investor protection, the functioning of fair, orderly and transparent markets, the integrity and stability of the capital markets and compliance with any condition or restriction imposed by MAS.
Odjeljkom 46. SFA-a MTS je ovlašten izdavati smjernice za odobrene burze u vezi s određenim pitanjima koje je utvrdio SFA kako bi se osigurala zaštita ulagatelja, pošteno, uredno i transparentno funkcioniranje tržišta, integritet i stabilnost tržišta kapitala te usklađenost sa svim uvjetima ili ograničenjima koje je uveo MTS.
MAS has statutory powers to issue legally-binding notices, guidelines, codes, policy statements and practice notes.
MTS ima zakonske ovlasti za izdavanje pravno obvezujućih obavijesti, smjernica, kodeksa, izjava o politici i napomena o praksi.
MAS may impose fines and issue reprimands for the infringement of provisions of the SFA or of its secondary legislation, including notices and directions.
MTS može odrediti novčane kazne i izdati opomene zbog kršenja odredaba SFA-a ili njegovih sekundarnih propisa, uključujući obavijesti i smjernice.
MAS may also remove key officers where it considers that doing so is in the interest of the public.
MTS može smijeniti ključne službenike ako smatra da je to u interesu javnosti.
Finally, MAS supervises the approved exchange's risk management practices and controls, through on-site and off-site inspections.
Naposljetku, inspekcijama na licu mjesta i drugim vrstama inspekcija MTS nadzire praksu i kontrole upravljanja rizikom koje provode odobrene burze.
It should therefore be concluded that approved exchanges are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in Singapore on an ongoing basis.
Stoga bi se trebalo zaključiti da te odobrene burze podliježu učinkovitom nadzoru i izvršenju u Singapuru na kontinuiranoj osnovi.
The conditions laid down in Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 should therefore be considered to be satisfied with respect to approved exchanges in Singapore.
Stoga bi se u pogledu odobrenih burzi u Singapuru trebalo smatrati da su ispunjeni uvjeti iz članka 2.a Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012.
This Decision is based on the legally binding requirements relating to approved exchanges in Singapore at the time of the adoption of this Decision.
Ova se Odluka temelji na pravno obvezujućim zahtjevima koji se odnose na odobrene burze u Singapuru u trenutku donošenja ove Odluke.
The Commission should continue monitoring on a regular basis the evolution of the legal and supervisory arrangements for approved exchanges and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this Decision has been taken.
Komisija bi trebala i dalje redovito pratiti razvoj pravnog i nadzornog okvira za odobrene burze te ispunjavanje uvjeta na temelju kojih je donesena ova Odluka.
In particular, the Commission should review this Decision in light of the entry into application of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] and Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Komisija bi osobito trebala preispitati ovu Odluku s obzirom na početak primjene Uredbe (EU) br. 600/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3] i Direktive 2014/65/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4].
The regular review of the legal and supervisory arrangements applicable to approved exchanges in Singapore is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to undertake a specific review at any time where relevant developments make it necessary for the Commission to reassess the equivalence granted by this Decision.
Redovitom revizijom pravnog i nadzornog okvira primjenjivog na odobrene burze u Singapuru ne dovodi se u pitanje mogućnost da Komisija u bilo kojem trenutku provede posebnu reviziju ako zbog relevantnih događaja Komisija treba ponovno procijeniti istovrijednost utvrđenu ovom Odlukom.
Such re-assessment could lead to the repeal of this Decision.
Na temelju te ponovne procjene ova bi se Odluka mogla staviti izvan snage.
For the purposes of point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the approved exchanges in Singapore and set out in the Annex shall be considered as equivalent to regulated markets as defined in point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Za potrebe članka 2. točke 7. Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 odobrene burze u Singapuru koje su navedene u Prilogu smatraju se istovrijednima uređenim tržištima kako su definirana u članku 4. stavku 1. točki 14. Direktive 2004/39/EZ.
Approved exchanges in Singapore referred to in Article 1
Odobrene burze u Singapuru iz članka 1.:
ICE Futures Singapore.
ICE Futures Singapore
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2271
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2016/2271
on the equivalence of financial instrument exchanges and commodity exchanges in Japan in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o istovrijednosti burzi financijskih instrumenata i robnih burzi u Japanu u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 648/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories [1], and in particular Article 2a thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 648/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o OTC izvedenicama, središnjoj drugoj ugovornoj strani i trgovinskom repozitoriju [1], a posebno njezin članak 2.a,
Point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 defines OTC derivatives as derivative contracts the execution of which does not take place on a regulated market within the meaning of point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and the of the Council [2] or on a third country market considered as equivalent to a regulated market in accordance with Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
U članku 2. točki 7. Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 OTC izvedenice definirane su kao ugovori o izvedenicama koji se ne izvršavaju na uređenom tržištu u smislu članka 4. stavka 1. točke (14) Direktive 2004/39/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [2] ili na tržištu treće zemlje koje se smatra istovrijednim uređenom tržištu u skladu s člankom 2.a Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012.
Therefore, any derivative contract the execution of which takes place on a third-country market not deemed equivalent to regulated markets are classified as OTC for the purposes of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Stoga se za potrebe Uredbe (EU) br. 648/2012 svaki ugovor o izvedenicama koji se izvršava na tržištu treće zemlje koje se ne smatra istovrijednim uređenim tržištima smatra ugovorom o OTC izvedenicama.
In order for a third-country market to be considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC, the substantive outcome of the applicable legally binding requirements and supervisory and enforcement arrangements should be equivalent to Union requirements in respect of the regulatory objectives they achieve.
Kako bi se tržište treće zemlje smatralo istovrijednim uređenom tržištu u smislu Direktive 2004/39/EZ, ishod primjenjivih pravno obvezujućih zahtjeva te okvira nadzora i izvršenja trebao bi u osnovi biti istovrijedan ishodu zahtjeva Unije u pogledu regulatornih ciljeva koji se njima ostvaruju.
The purpose of this equivalence assessment is therefore to verify that the legally binding requirements which apply to financial instruments exchanges (FIEs) and commodity exchanges in Japan are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC, and that those markets are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
Stoga je svrha ove procjene istovrijednosti provjeriti jesu li pravno obvezujući zahtjevi koji se primjenjuju na burze financijskih instrumenata (financial instruments exchanges – FIE-ovi) i robne burze u Japanu istovrijedni zahtjevima iz glave III. Direktive 2004/39/EZ te podliježu li ta tržišta učinkovitom nadzoru i izvršenju na kontinuiranoj osnovi.
Markets which are authorised as FIEs or commodity exchanges on the date of adoption of this Decision should be therefore identified as markets considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Stoga se tržišta koja na dan donošenja ove Odluke imaju odobrenje za rad kao FIE-ovi ili robne burze trebaju priznati kao tržišta koja se smatraju istovrijednima uređenom tržištu u smislu Direktive 2004/39/EZ.