natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court of 27 October 2005, Nazairdis SAS and others v Caisse nationale de l'organisation autonome d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic), C-266/04 to C-270/04, C-276/04 and C-321/04 to C-325/04, ECLI:EU:C:2005:657, paragraphs 46 to 49.
presuda Suda od 27. listopada 2005., Nazairdis SAS e.a./Caisse nationale de l'organisation autonome d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic), C-266/04 do C-270/04, C-276/04 i C-321/04 do C-325/04, ECLI:EU:C:2005:657, t. 46. do 49.
Judgment of the Court of 13 January 2005, Streekgewest Westelijk Noord-Brabant, C-174/02, ECLI:EU:C:2005:10, paragraph 28, and Judgment of the Court of 15 June 2006, Air Liquide, Joined Cases C-393/04 and C-41/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:403, paragraph 46.
Presuda Suda od 13. siječnja 2005., Streekgewest Westelijk Noord-Brabant, C-174/02, ECLI:EU:C:2005:10 t. 28. te presuda Suda od 15. lipnja 2006., Air Liquide, spojeni predmeti C-393/04 i C-41/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:403, t. 46.
With regard to discrimination between domestic and exported products, see, inter alia, the Judgment of the Court of 23 April 2002, Nygård, C-234/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:244, paragraphs 21-22.
U pogledu diskriminacije između domaćih i izvezenih proizvoda vidjeti, među ostalim, presudu Suda od 23. travnja 2002., Nygard, C-234/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:244, t. 21. – 22.
With regard to discrimination between domestic and imported products, see the Judgment of the Court of 11 March 1992, Compagnie Commerciale de l'Ouest, Joined Cases C-78/90, C-79/90, C-80/90, C-81/90, C-82/90 and C-83/90, ECLI:EU:C:1992:118, paragraph 26.
U pogledu diskriminacije između domaćih i uvezenih proizvoda vidjeti presudu Suda od 11. ožujka 1992., Compagnie Commerciale de l'Ouest, spojeni predmeti C-78/90, C-79/90, C-80/90, C-81/90, C-82/90 i C-83/90, ECLI:EU:C:1992:118, t. 26.
Judgment of the Court of 21 October 2003, van Calster, C-261/01 and C-262/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:571, paragraph 48.
Presuda Suda od 21. listopada 2003., Van Calster, C-261/01 i C-262/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:571, t. 48.
Judgment of the Court of 22 May 2003, Freskot, C-355/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:298, paragraphs 18-32.
Presuda Suda od 22. svibnja 2003., Freskot, C-355/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:298, t. 18. – 32.
The MFG is a Federal law which entered into force in 1952 and has since been amended several times, most recently on 31 October 2006.
MFG je njemački savezni zakon koji je stupio na snagu 1952. i otad je izmijenjen nekoliko puta, a posljednji put 31. listopada 2006.
It constitutes the legal framework for the measures at issue, and its validity is unlimited in time.
On predstavlja pravni okvir za predmetne mjere i njegovo je razdoblje valjanosti neograničeno.
Baden-Württemberg has also pointed out that the collection of the levy was suspended in Baden-Württemberg on 31 December 2012.
Osim toga, Baden-Württemberg je istaknuo da je naplata pristojbe za mlijeko u Baden-Württembergu obustavljena 31. prosinca 2012.
The dairy industry in Baden-Württemberg contributed to funding VDM in both 2013 and 2014 through Milchwirtschaftlicher Verein Baden-Württemberg e.V.
Mljekarska industrija u Baden-Württembergu je 2013. i 2014. pridonijela financiranju VDM-a preko saveza Milchwirtschaftlicher Verein Baden-Württemberg e.V.
(from members' contributions).
(doprinosima članova).
CCFH — Food Hygiene,
CCFH – Food Hygiene,
CCCF — Contaminants in Foods,
CCCF – Contaminants in Foods,
CCFA — Food Additives,
CCFA – Food Additives,
CCFICS — Food Import Certificates,
CCFICS – Food Import Certificates,
CCGP — General Principles,
CCGP – General Principles,
CCMAS — Methods of Analysis and Sampling,
CCMAS – Methods of Analysis and Sampling,
VDM's measures in this area thus regularly related to new techniques within the meaning of paragraph 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Mjere VDM-a u tom području odnose se stoga redovito na nove metode u smislu članka 14. stavka 1. Smjernica Zajednice 2000.
Since they involved the determination and dissemination of scientific knowledge, VDM's standardisation and harmonisation activities should therefore also be categorised as technical support.
2006. Stoga je i djelatnost VDM-a u području normizacije i standardizacije, potrebno pripisati tehničkoj pomoći kao utvrđivanje i širenje znanstvenih saznanja.
VDM carries out its activities under the headings ‘advice to state bodies’, ‘involvement in standardisation and harmonisation’ and ‘provision of general information’ in the interests and on behalf of its members. Those activities, which are directly related to its economic activities, save the dairies from having to implement such initiatives themselves — and from having to provide the necessary funding — in order to create a (market) environment conducive to their sales.
Djelatnosti koje VDM obavlja, odnosno „savjetovanje pred državnim tijelima”, „sudjelovanje u normizaciji i standardizaciji” te „pružanje općih informacija”, djelatnosti su koje obavlja u interesu i na zahtjev svojih članova, izravno su povezane s njihovom gospodarskom djelatnosti i oslobađaju mljekare od tereta u smislu samostalne provedbe odgovarajućih inicijativa, kao i prikupljanja potrebnih sredstava u tu svrhu, kako bi na taj način stvorile odgovarajuće (tržišno) okruženje za vlastitu prodaju.
Members of VDM include Milchindustrie-Verband e.V.
Članovi su VDM-a, među ostalim, Milchindustrie-Verband e.V.
(MIV) and Deutsche Bauernverband e.V.
(MIV) i Deutscher Bauernverband e.V.
The membership of MIV is in turn made up of German dairies, including those covered by this Decision, in the Länder that collect the milk levy.
Članovi su MIV-a pak njemačke mljekare, uključujući mljekare na koje se odnosi ova odluka u saveznim pokrajinama u kojima se naplaćuje pristojba za mlijeko.
No questions are raised in this respect by VDM's assertion that the content of its activity involved ‘channelling the democratically formulated opinion of its members into the legislative process’.
Tvrdnjom VDM-a da je njegova djelatnost uključivala „prenošenje demokratski stvorenog mišljenja članova VDM-a u zakonodavni postupak” ta se činjenica ne dovodi u pitanje.
The fact is that VDM does not represent general interests but rather the interests of its members, the aim being to channel the dairy industry's views into the legislative and regulatory process and thus to bring its influence to bear in that process
Naime, VDM ne zastupa opće interese, nego interese svojih članova kako bi se stajalište mliječne industrije uključilo u postupak donošenja zakona i normi te kako bi se utjecalo na taj postupak.
The provision of technical support is regulated by paragraph 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Pružanje tehničke pomoći uređeno je u odjeljku 14. Smjernica Zajednice 2000. – 2006.
According to the third indent of point 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines, consultant's fees are fully compatible with the internal market.
U skladu s točkom 14.1. trećom alinejom Smjernica Zajednice 2000. – 2006. naknade za savjetodavne usluge u načelu u spojive s unutarnjim tržištem.
The provision of technical support is regulated by Section IV.K of the 2007-2013 Guidelines.
Pružanje tehničke pomoći uređeno je u odjeljku IV.K Smjernica 2007. – 2013.
The aid benefited dairies in the Länder that collect the milk levy.
Potpore su koristile mljekarama u saveznim pokrajinama koje naplaćuju pristojbu za mlijeko.
The eligible costs relating to the provision of technical support are exhaustively listed in the five indents of paragraph 14.1 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Prihvatljivi troškovi nastali u okviru pružanja tehničke pomoći konačno su navedeni u pet alineja točke 14.1. Smjernica 2000.
The provision of the information in question may be regarded as measure for the dissemination of knowledge relating to new techniques pursuant to the fifth indent.
2006. Predmetno pružanje informacija može se smatrati mjerom širenja novih metoda u smislu pete alineje.
These are laid down in Section IV.K of the 2007-2013 Guidelines.
Pružanje tehničke pomoći uređeno je u odjeljku IV.K Smjernica 2007. – 2013.
Judgment of the Court of 19 December 2013, Vent de Colère, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, paragraph 11; and the opinion of Advocate-General Jääskinen of 11 July 2013, Vent de Colère, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:469, inter alia, paragraph 49.
Presuda Suda od 19. prosinca 2013., Vent de Colère, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, t. 11., i mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika Jääskinena od 11. srpnja 2013., Vent de Colère, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:469, i dr., t. 49.
(hereinafter ‘VDM’) in connection with the MFG which are the subject of this Decision, the Commission based its Opening Decision on the belief that aid had been granted and expressed doubts as to the compatibility of the measures with the internal market.
(dalje u tekstu: „VDM”) u razdoblju od 28. studenoga 2001. poduzeo u vezi s MFG-om, Komisija je u Odluci o pokretanju postupka pretpostavila postojanje potpore i izrazila sumnju u pogledu njezine spojivosti s unutarnjim tržištem.
VDM also claimed that, for the period 2001-2006, the measures related solely to milk, an Annex I product.
Nadalje, VDM je u pogledu razdoblja 2001.
The measures were concerned with the dissemination of scientific knowledge, in particular the state of the art and current best practice, forming the basis for the standards co-formulated by VDM or established with its input, or influencing new legislative initiatives.
2006. naveo da su se mjere isključivo odnosile na mlijeko kao proizvod iz Priloga I. Predmet je mjera širenje znanstvenih saznanja, posebno u pogledu trenutačnog stanja tehnike i najbolje prakse, na kojem se temelje norme i standardi u čijoj je izradi VDM sudjelovao, odnosno o kojima je savjetovao ili koje je potrebno uključiti u zakonodavne inicijative.
In their comments in the formal investigation procedure concerning the milk levy provided for in the MFG, the German Länder in question had focused on two aspects:
Predmetne savezne pokrajine u svojim su se očitovanjima u istražnom postupku u pogledu pristojbe za mlijeko u skladu s MFG-om usredotočile na dva važna elementa i to, s jedne strane, na usklađenost poduzetih mjera s materijalnim odredbama prava o državnim potporama (posebno u pogledu spojivosti mjera s odredbama Uredbe o izuzećima u poljoprivredi te s poljoprivrednim okvirom koji se primjenjuje u određenom trenutku) te, s druge strane, na okolnosti na kojima se temelji pitanje o postojanju prednosti u skladu s pravilima o državnim potporama u smislu članka 107. stavka 1.
the consistency of the measures implemented with the material requirements of the State aid rules (in particular as regards their compatibility with the requirements of the Agriculture Exemption Regulation and the current agricultural guidelines), and the question whether there was any ‘favouring’ relevant to the State aid rules within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
UFEU-a.
Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2016/296
Odluka Vijeća (EU, Euratom) 2016/296
replacing a member of the panel provided for in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
o zamjeni člana odbora predviđenog u članku 255. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije
Having regard to the initiative of the President of the Court of Justice of 27 January 2016,
uzimajući u obzir inicijativu predsjednika Suda od 27. siječnja 2016.,
Pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a panel was set up in order to give an opinion on candidates' suitability to perform the duties of Judge and Advocate-General of the Court of Justice and the General Court before the Governments of the Member States make the appointments (the ‘panel’).
Na temelju članka 255. prvog stavka Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a prije nego što vlade država članica imenuju kandidate, osnovan je odbor zadužen za davanje mišljenja o prikladnosti kandidatâ za obnašanje dužnosti suca i nezavisnog odvjetnika Suda i Općeg suda („odbor”).
By Decision 2014/76/EU [1], the Council appointed the seven members of the panel for a period of 4 years, ending on 28 February 2018.
Odlukom 2014/76/EU [1] Vijeće je imenovalo sedam članova odbora za razdoblje od četiri godine koje završava 28. veljače 2018.
By letter of 27 January 2016, the President of the Court of Justice informed the President of the Council that Mr Péter PACZOLAY had resigned from his functions as member of the panel with effect from 21 January 2016.
Dopisom od 27. siječnja 2016. predsjednik Suda obavijestio je predsjednika Vijeća da je g. Péter PACZOLAY odstupio od svoje dužnosti člana odbora s učinkom od 21. siječnja 2016.
By the same letter of 27 January 2016, the President of the Court of Justice proposed the appointment of Mr Mirosław WYRZYKOWSKI to replace Mr Péter PACZOLAY for the remainder of his term, in accordance with point 3 of the operating rules of the panel as set out in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/124/EU [2],
Istim dopisom od 27. siječnja 2016. predsjednik Suda predložio je imenovanje g. Mirosława WYRZYKOWSKOG kao zamjenu za g. Pétera PACZOLAYA tijekom preostalog trajanja mandata u skladu s točkom 3. pravila rada odbora iz Priloga Odluci Vijeća 2010/124/EU [2],
Mr Mirosław WYRZYKOWSKI is hereby appointed member of the panel provided for in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for a period ending on 28 February 2018.
G. Mirosław WYRZYKOWSKI imenuje se članom odbora predviđenog u članku 255. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije za razdoblje koje završava 28. veljače 2018.
Council Decision 2014/76/EU of 11 February 2014 appointing the members of the panel provided for in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 41, 12.2.2014, p. 18).
Odluka Vijeća 2014/76/EU od 11. veljače 2014. o imenovanju članova odbora predviđenog u članku 255. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 41, 12.2.2014., str. 18.).
Council Decision 2010/124/EU of 25 February 2010 relating to the operating rules of the panel provided for in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 50, 27.2.2010, p. 18).
Odluka Vijeća 2010/124/EU od 25. veljače 2010. o pravilima rada odbora iz članka 255. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 50, 27.2.2010., str. 18.).
Council Decision (EU) 2016/298
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2016/298
on the position to be adopted by the European Union within the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors regarding approval of derogations to the Financial Regulation of the Centre for the Development of the Enterprise (CDE)
o stajalištu koje Europska unija treba donijeti unutar Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EU u pogledu odobrenja za odstupanja od Financijskog pravilnika Centra za razvoj poduzetništva (CDE)
Having regard to Decision No 5/2004 of the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors of 17 December 2004 concerning the Financial Regulation of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise [2],
uzimajući u obzir Odluku br. 5/2004 Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EZ od 17. prosinca 2004. u pogledu Financijskog pravilnika Centra za razvoj poduzetništva [2],
At its 39th session from 19 to 20 June 2014 in Nairobi, Kenya, the ACP-EU Council of Ministers agreed, in a Joint Declaration, to proceed with the orderly closing of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise (‘CDE’), and to the amendment of Annex III to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part (‘ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’) and to that end, to delegate powers to the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors to take the matter forward with a view to the adoption of the necessary decisions.
Na 39. sjednici, održanoj 19. i 20. lipnja 2014. u Nairobiju, u Keniji, Vijeće ministara AKP-EU dogovorilo je u Zajedničkoj izjavi da će nastaviti provedbu propisanog zatvaranja Centra za razvoj poduzetništva („CDE”) i izmijeniti Prilog III. Sporazumu o partnerstvu između članica Skupine afričkih, karipskih i pacifičkih država s jedne strane i Europske zajednice i njezinih država članica s druge strane („Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-EU”) te, u tu svrhu, Odboru veleposlanika AKP-EU delegirati ovlasti za poduzimanje daljnjih koraka u cilju donošenja potrebnih odluka.
In its Decision No 4/2014 [3], the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors recalls that the closure of the CDE is to respect the competences of the CDE's supervisory authorities set out in Annex III to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement and the detailed arrangements laid down by the ACP-EU Council of Ministers in its Joint Declaration.
Odbor veleposlanika AKP-EU u svojoj Odluci br. 4/2014 [3] podsjetio je da pri zatvaranju CDE-a treba poštovati nadležnosti nadzornih tijela CDE-a utvrđene u Prilogu III. Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-EU te detaljne aranžmane utvrđene u Zajedničkoj izjavi Vijeća ministara AKP-EU.
Annex III to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement requires the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors to monitor the overall strategy of the CDE and supervise the work of the Executive Board.
U Prilogu III. Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-EU zahtijeva se da Odbor veleposlanika AKP-EU nadzire ukupnu strategiju CDE-a te rad izvršnog odbora.
Annex III to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement requires the CDE Executive Board to lay down the financial and staff regulations and the rules of operations.
Prilogom III. Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-EU od izvršnog odbora CDE-a zahtijeva se da „propisuje financijska pravila i pravila o ljudskim resursima, kao i pravilnik o radu”.
The request from the CDE Executive Board to the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors by letter dated 19 October 2015 explains that, in the context of the closing down of the CDE, the CDE Executive Board wishes to derogate from Article 27(1) and (5) of Decision No 5/2004 of the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors of 17 December 2004 concerning the Financial Regulation of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise (‘CDE Financial Regulation’) and seeks prior approval from the supervisory authorities.
U zahtjevu izvršnog odbora CDE-a iz dopisa poslanog Odboru veleposlanika AKP-EU 19. listopada 2015. objašnjeno je da izvršni odbor CDE-a u kontekstu zatvaranja CDE-a želi odstupiti od članka 27. stavaka 1. i 5. Odluke br. 5/2004 Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EZ od 17. prosinca 2004. u pogledu Financijskog pravilnika Centra za razvoj poduzetništva („Financijski pravilnik CDE-a”) i za to odstupanje traži prethodno odobrenje nadzornih tijela.
The modification of, or derogations to, the CDE Financial Regulation and CDE Staff Regulations [4], depending on the needs that may arise from the implementation of the orderly closure process of the CDE, necessitates a flexible procedure.
Za izmjene Financijskog pravilnika CDE-a i Pravilnika o osoblju CDE-a [4] ili odstupanje od tih pravilnika, ovisno o potrebama koje mogu nastati u provedbi pravilnog postupka zatvaranja CDE-a, potreban je fleksibilan postupak.
The requirement of the appointment of a firm of auditors for a period of three years, as set out in Article 27(1) of the CDE Financial Regulation, and the requirement for this firm to draw up each year a statutory audit report, in accordance with Article 27(5) of that Regulation, need to be adapted in order to ensure a more efficient procedure in the context of the closing-down of the organisation,
Radi osiguranja efikasnijeg postupka u kontekstu zatvaranja CDE-a, treba prilagoditi zahtjev za imenovanje revizorskog društva na trogodišnje razdoblje, kako je određen u članku 27. stavku 1. Financijskog pravilnika CDE-a, i zahtjev u skladu s kojim to društvo mora svake godine sastaviti obvezno izvješće o reviziji, u skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 5. tog pravilnika,
The position to be adopted by the Union in the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors regarding the approval of the derogations to the CDE Financial Regulation shall be based on the draft Decision of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors attached to this Decision.
Stajalište koje Europska unija treba donijeti u okviru Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EU u pogledu odobrenja odstupanja od Financijskog pravilnika CDE-a temelji se na nacrtu Odluke Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EU priloženog ovoj Odluci.
Minor changes to the draft Decision may be agreed by the representatives of the Union in the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors without further decision of the Council.
Predstavnici Unije u Odboru veleposlanika AKP-EU mogu prihvatiti manje izmjene nacrta Odluke bez daljnje odluke Vijeća.
After its adoption, the Decision of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Nakon njezina donošenja, Odluka Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EU objavljuje se u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Decision No 4/2014 of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors of 23 October 2014 regarding the mandate to be given to the Executive Board of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise (CDE) (OJ L 330, 15.11.2014, p. 61).
Odluka br. 4/2014 Odbora veleposlanika AKP-a i EU-a od 23. listopada 2014. o mandatu koji treba dati izvršnom odboru Centra za razvoj poduzetništva (CDE) (SL L 330, 15.11.2014., str. 61.)
Decision No 9/2005 of the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors of 27 July 2005 concerning the Staff Regulations of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise (CDE) (OJ L 348, 30.12.2005, p. 54).
Odluka br. 9/2005 Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EZ od 27. srpnja 2005. o Pravilniku o osoblju Centra za razvoj poduzetništva (CDE) (SL L 348, 30.12.2005., str. 54.).
DECISION OF THE ACP-EU COMMITTEE OF AMBASSADORS
ODLUKE ODBORA VELEPOSLANIKA AKP-EU
on the approval of derogations to the Financial Regulation of the Centre for the Development of the Enterprise (CDE)
o odobrenju za odstupanja od Financijskog pravilnika Centra za razvoj poduzetništva (CDE)
Annex III to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, (ACP EU Partnership Agreement) requires the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors to monitor the overall strategy of the CDE and supervise the work of the Executive Board.
Prilogom III. Sporazumu o partnerstvu između članica Skupine afričkih, karipskih i pacifičkih država s jedne strane i Europske zajednice i njezinih država članica s druge strane („Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-EU”) zahtijeva se da Odbor veleposlanika AKP-EU nadzire ukupnu strategiju CDE-a te rad izvršnog odbora.
The Statutes and Rules of Procedure of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise adopted by Decision No 8/2005 of the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors [3] (the ‘CDE Statutes’) and Decision No 5/2004 of the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors (‘CDE Financial Regulation’) [4] provide the safeguards in terms of information of and supervision by the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors.
Statutom i Poslovnikom Centra za razvoj poduzetništva, donesenima Odlukom br. 8/2005 Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EU [3] („Statut CDE-a”), i Odlukom br. 5/2004 Odbora veleposlanika AKP-EZ („Financijski pravilnik CDE-a”) [4] pruža se zaštita u smislu informacija koje se odnose na Odbor veleposlanika AKP-EU te nadzora koji taj odbor provodi.
At its 39th session held from 19 to 20 June in Nairobi, the ACP-EU Council of Ministers agreed, in a Joint Declaration, to proceed with the orderly closing of the CDE and to the amendment of Annex III to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement and, to that end, to delegate powers to the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors to take the matter forward with a view to the adoption of the necessary decisions.
Na 39. sjednici, održanoj 19. i 20. lipnja 2014. u Nairobiju, Vijeće ministara AKP-EU dogovorilo se u Zajedničkoj izjavi da će nastaviti provedbu propisanog zatvaranja CDE-a i izmijeniti Prilog III. Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-EU te, u tu svrhu, Odboru veleposlanika AKP-EU delegirati ovlasti za poduzimanje daljnjih koraka u cilju donošenja potrebnih odluka.