natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annex XIV is amended as follows:
2. Prilog XIV. mijenja se kako slijedi:
in Chapter II, Section 1, in Table 2, row number 12 is replaced by the following:
u tablici 2 odjeljka 1. poglavlja II. redak 12. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
Petfood, including dogchews
Hrana za kućne ljubimce, uključujući žvakalice za pse
In the case of processed petfood and of dogchews: materials referred to in Article 35(a)(i) and (ii).
U slučaju prerađene hrane za kućne ljubimce i žvakalica za pse: materijali iz članka 35. točke (a) podtočaka i. i ii.;
In the case of raw petfood: materials referred to in Article 35(a)(iii).
U slučaju sirove hrane za kućne ljubimce: Materijali iz članka 35. točke (a) podtočke iii.
The petfood and the dogchews must have been produced in accordance with Chapter II of Annex XIII.
Hrana za kućne ljubimce i žvakalice za pse moraju biti proizvedeni u skladu s poglavljem II. Priloga XIII.
In the case of raw petfood:
U slučaju sirove hrane za kućne ljubimce:
Third countries listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 or in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008, from which Member States authorise imports of fresh meat from the same species and where only bone-in meat is authorised.
Treće zemlje s popisa iz dijela 1. Priloga II. Uredbi (EU) br. 206/2010 ili Priloga I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 798/2008, iz kojih države članice dopuštaju uvoz svježega mesa istih životinjskih vrsta i u kojima je dopušteno samo meso s kostima.
In the case of fish materials, third countries listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC.
U slučaju materijala od riba, treće zemlje s popisa iz Priloga II. Odluke 2006/766/EZ.
In the case of dogchews and petfood other than raw petfood:
U slučaju žvakalica za pse i hrane za kućne ljubimce, osim sirove hrane za kućne ljubimce:
Third countries listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, and the following countries:
treće zemlje s popisa iz dijela 1. Priloga II. Uredbi (EU) br. 206/2010 i sljedeće zemlje:
(EC) Ecuador
(EC) Ekvador,
(LK) Sri Lanka
(LK) Šri Lanka,
(TW) Taiwan.
(TW) Tajvan.
In the case of processed petfood derived from fish materials, third countries listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC.
U slučaju prerađene hrane za kućne ljubimce dobivene od materijala od riba, treće zemlje s popisa iz Priloga II. Odluci 2006/766/EZ.
In the case of canned petfood: Annex XV, Chapter 3(A).
U slučaju konzervirane hrane za kućne ljubimce: Točka A poglavlja 3. Priloga XV.
In the case of processed petfood other than canned petfood: Annex XV, Chapter 3(B).
U slučaju prerađene hrane za kućne ljubimce, osim konzervirane hrane za kućne ljubimce: Točka B. poglavlja 3. Priloga XV.
In the case of dogchews: Annex XV, Chapter 3(C).
U slučaju žvakalica za pse: Točka C poglavlja 3. Priloga XV.
In the case of raw petfood: Annex XV, Chapter 3(D).’
U slučaju sirove hrane za kućne ljubimce: Točka D poglavlja 3. Priloga XV.”;
the following Chapter V is added:
dodaje se sljedeće poglavlje V.:
RULES FOR THE EXPORT OF CERTAIN DERIVED PRODUCTS
PRAVILA ZA IZVOZ ODREĐENIH DOBIVENIH PROIZVODA
Rules applicable to the export of the derived products listed below as referred to in Article 25(4):
Pravila koja se primjenjuju na izvoz dobivenih proizvoda navedenih u nastavku u skladu s člankom 25. stavkom 4: Dobiveni proizvodi Pravila za izvoz 1.
Derived products Rules for export
Prerađeni stajski gnoj i organska gnojiva, komposti ili ostaci digestije od pretvorbe u bioplin koji osim prerađenog stajskog gnoja ne sadržavaju ni jedan drugi nusproizvod životinjskog podrijetla niti dobiveni proizvod
1 Processed manure and organic fertilizers, compost or digestion residues from biogas transformation containing no other animal by-products or derived products than processed manure Processed manure and organic fertilizers, compost or digestion residues from biogas transformation containing no other animal by-products or derived products than processed manure must comply at least with the conditions set out in points (a), (b), (d) and (e) of Section 2 of Chapter I of Annex XI.’
Prerađeni stajski gnoj i organska gnojiva, komposti ili ostaci digestije od pretvorbe u bioplin koji osim prerađenog stajskog gnoja ne sadržavaju ni jedan drugi nusproizvod životinjskog podrijetla niti dobiveni proizvod moraju ispunjavati barem uvjete iz točaka (a), (b), (d) i (e) odjeljka 2. poglavlja I. Priloga XI.”
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/173
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/173
amending Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011, as regards the name of the holder of the authorisation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 and Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515
o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 1292/2008 i Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 887/2011 u pogledu naziva nositelja odobrenja za Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 i Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515
Norel SA has submitted an application in accordance with Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 proposing to change the name of the holder of the authorisation as regards Commission Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 [2] and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 [3].
U skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003 trgovačko društvo Norel SA podnijelo je zahtjev za promjenu naziva nositelja odobrenja iz Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 1292/2008 [2] i Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) br. 887/2011 [3].
The proposed change of the authorisation holder is purely administrative in nature and does not entail a fresh assessment of the additives concerned.
Predložena promjena nositelja odobrenja u potpunosti je administrativne prirode i ne podrazumijeva novu procjenu predmetnih dodataka.
In order to allow Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH to exploit its marketing rights, it is necessary to change the terms of the respective authorisations.
Kako bi se trgovačkom društvu Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH omogućilo korištenje pravima stavljanja proizvoda na tržište, potrebno je izmijeniti uvjete predmetnih odobrenja.
Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Stoga je Uredbu (EZ) br. 1292/2008 i Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 887/2011 potrebno na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the amendments made by this Regulation to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period during which existing stocks may be used up.
Budući da ne postoje sigurnosni razlozi zbog kojih bi bilo potrebno odmah primjenjivati izmjene Uredbe (EZ) br. 1292/2008 i Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 887/2011 predviđene ovom Uredbom, primjereno je osigurati prijelazno razdoblje tijekom kojeg se mogu potrošiti postojeće zalihe.
Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008
Izmjena Uredbe (EZ) br. 1292/2008
In column 2 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 the term ‘Norel SA’ is replaced by the term ‘Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH’.
U stupcu 2. Priloga Uredbi (EZ) br. 1292/2008 naziv „Norel SA” zamjenjuje se nazivom „Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH”.
Amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011
Izmjena Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 887/2011
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 is amended as follows:
Provedbena uredba (EU) br. 887/2011 mijenja se kako slijedi:
in the title, the term ‘Norel SA’ is replaced by the term ‘Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH’;
u naslovu, naziv „Norel SA” zamjenjuje se nazivom „Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH”;
in column 2 of the Annex, the term ‘Norel SA’ is replaced by the term ‘Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH’.
u stupcu 2. Priloga, naziv „Norel SA” zamjenjuje se nazivom „Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH”.
Existing stocks of the additives which are in conformity with the provisions applying before the date of entry into force of this Regulation may continue to be placed on the market and used until they are exhausted.
Postojeće zalihe tih dodataka koji su u skladu s odredbama koje se primjenjuju prije datuma stupanja na snagu ove Uredbe mogu se nastaviti stavljati na tržište i upotrebljavati do njihova isteka.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 of 18 December 2008 concerning the authorisation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 (Ecobiol and Ecobiol plus) as a feed additive (OJ L 340, 19.12.2008, p. 36).
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 1292/2008 od 18. prosinca 2008. o odobrenju Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 (Ecobiol i Ecobiol plus) kao dodatka hrani za životinje (SL L 340, 19.12.2008., str. 36.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 of 5 September 2011 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 as feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation Norel SA) (OJ L 229, 6.9.2011, p. 7).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 887/2011 od 5. rujna 2011. o odobrenju pripravka Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 kao dodatka hrani za tovne piliće (nositelj odobrenja Norel SA) (SL L 229, 6.9.2011., str. 7.).
The applicant claims that Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH has acquired from Norel SA the marketing rights for the feed additives Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 and Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 with effect from 4 July 2016.
Podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdi da je društvo Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH od društva Norel SA steklo prava stavljanja na tržište dodataka hrani za životinje Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 i Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 s učinkom od 4. srpnja 2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/174
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/174
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/180
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/180
supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for benchmarking portfolio assessment standards and assessment-sharing procedures
o dopuni Direktive 2013/36/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu regulatornih tehničkih standarda za standarde procjene referentnih portfelja i postupke razmjene tih procjena
Having regard to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 78(7) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2013/36/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 26. lipnja 2013. o pristupanju djelatnosti kreditnih institucija i bonitetnom nadzoru nad kreditnim institucijama i investicijskim društvima, izmjeni Direktive 2002/87/EZ te stavljanju izvan snage direktiva 2006/48/EZ i 2006/49/EZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 78. stavak 7. treći podstavak,
It is necessary to lay down standards for the assessment by competent authorities of the internal approaches adopted by institutions' calculating own funds requirements and set out detailed rules in respect of the procedures for sharing of those assessments between competent authorities empowered to monitor the range of risk-weighted exposure amounts or own funds requirements by institutions permitted to use internal approaches for the calculation of those amounts or own fund requirements.
Potrebno je utvrditi standarde na temelju kojih nadležna tijela procjenjuju interne pristupe institucija za izračun kapitalnih zahtjeva i odrediti detaljna pravila o postupcima razmjene tih procjena među nadležnim tijelima ovlaštenima za nadzor raspona iznosa izloženosti ponderirane rizikom ili kapitalnih zahtjeva institucija kojima je odobrena upotreba internih pristupa za izračun tih iznosa ili kapitalnih zahtjeva.
The assessment of the quality of advanced approaches of institutions allows for the comparison of internal approaches at the Union level, whereby the European Banking Authority (EBA) assists competent authorities with their assessment of potential underestimation of own funds requirements.
Procjena kvalitete naprednih pristupa institucija omogućuje usporedbu internih pristupa na razini Unije, pri čemu Europsko nadzorno tijelo za bankarstvo (EBA) pomaže nadležnim tijelima pri procjeni potencijalnog podcjenjivanja kapitalnih zahtjeva.
The rules on the procedures for sharing assessments should contain appropriate provisions on the timing of the sharing of the assessments with the relevant competent authorities and EBA.
Pravila o postupcima razmjene procjena trebala bi sadržavati odgovarajuće odredbe o vremenskom rasporedu razmjene procjena između relevantnih nadležnih tijela i EBA-e.
Competent authorities responsible for the supervision of institutions belonging to a group subject to consolidated supervision have a legitimate interest in the quality of internal approaches used by those institutions, as they contribute to the joint decision of the approval of the internal approaches in the first place, by virtue of Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Tijela nadležna za nadzor institucija koje pripadaju grupi koja podliježe konsolidiranom nadzoru imaju legitiman interes u pogledu kvalitete internih pristupa koje upotrebljavaju te institucije jer se njima prije svega pridonosi zajedničkoj odluci o odobrenju internih pristupa, na temelju članka 20. Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [2].
Rules on the procedures for sharing assessments made in accordance with Article 78(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU should also specify how the general cooperation and information-sharing obligations within colleges apply in the particular context of the benchmarking exercise.
U pravilima o postupcima razmjene procjena izrađenih u skladu s člankom 78. stavkom 3. Direktive 2013/36/EU trebalo bi navesti i kako se opće obveze o suradnji i razmjeni informacija u okviru kolegijâ primjenjuju u konkretnom kontekstu postupka ocjenjivanja.
In order to ensure that the assessments made in accordance with Article 78(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU are shared in an efficient and practicable manner, competent authorities should make known their estimate or views on the level of potential underestimation of own fund requirements stemming from the internal approaches used by the institutions and the reasoning behind the conclusions of the competent authorities' assessment.
Kako bi se osigurala učinkovita i praktična razmjena procjena izrađenih u skladu s člankom 78. stavkom 3. Direktive 2013/36/EU, nadležna tijela trebala bi objaviti svoju procjenu ili stajalište o razini potencijalnog podcjenjivanja kapitalnih zahtjeva koji proizlaze iz internih pristupa koje upotrebljavaju institucije te obrazložiti zaključke na kojima se temelji procjena nadležnih tijela.
In addition, actual or envisaged corrective actions by competent authorities in accordance with Article 78(4) of that Directive are also relevant for all other competent authorities responsible for the supervision of institutions belonging to a group subject to consolidated supervision as they have a legitimate interest in the continuous quality of an internal approach used by those institutions.
Nadalje, konkretne ili predviđene korektivne mjere nadležnih tijela u skladu s člankom 78. stavkom 4. te Direktive mjerodavne su i za sva ostala tijela nadležna za nadzor institucija koje pripadaju grupi koja podliježe konsolidiranom nadzoru jer imaju legitiman interes u pogledu kontinuirane kvalitete internih pristupa koje upotrebljavaju te institucije.
Furthermore, actual or envisaged corrective actions by competent authorities should also be made known to EBA in accordance with Article 107(1) of that Directive, as they are necessary for EBA to carry out its tasks.
Osim toga, konkretne ili predviđene korektivne mjere nadležnih tijela potrebno je i priopćiti EBA-i u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 1. te Direktive jer su EBA-i potrebne za obavljanje njezinih zadaća.
The EBA report produced to assist competent authorities in their assessment of the quality of the internal approaches is a cornerstone of the benchmarking exercise, given that such report contains the results of the comparison of relevant institutions with their peers at the Union level.
Izvješće EBA-e izrađeno radi pomoći nadležnim tijelima pri procjeni kvalitete internih pristupa kamen je temeljac postupka ocjenjivanja jer to izvješće sadržava rezultate usporedbe relevantnih institucija s usporedivim institucijama na razini Unije.
Therefore, the information contained in the EBA report should constitute the basis on which competent authorities decide which firms and portfolios should be assessed with ‘particular attention’ as required by the first subparagraph of Article 78(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Stoga informacije sadržane u izvješću EBA-e trebaju biti temelj odlukama nadležnih tijela o tome koja društva i portfelje treba procijeniti s „posebnom pozornošću”, kao što je propisano u članku 78. stavku 3. prvom podstavku Direktive 2013/36/EU.
The results of the assessment of the quality of internal approaches depend on the quality of the data reported by relevant institutions under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 [3], which also need to be consistent and comparable.
Rezultati procjene kvalitete internih pristupa ovise o kvalitete podataka koje relevantne institucije dostavljaju u skladu s Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2016/2070 [3], koji trebaju biti usklađeni i usporedivi.
Therefore, competent authorities should be required to confirm the correct application of that Implementing Regulation by institutions, especially with regard to the application of the option available to institutions to refrain from reporting of certain individual portfolios.
Stoga bi nadležna tijela trebala imati obvezu potvrditi da institucije tu provedbenu uredbu pravilno primjenjuju, posebno u pogledu primjene mogućnosti dostupne institucijama da ne moraju dostaviti podatke o određenim pojedinačnim portfeljima.
Where competent authorities compute benchmarks based on the standardised approach, an adjustment should be made to the own fund requirements for credit risk that result from the application of the standardised approach, for reasons of prudence.
Ako nadležna tijela izračunavaju referentne vrijednosti na temelju standardiziranog pristupa, potrebno je radi opreza izvršiti prilagodbu kapitalnih zahtjeva za kreditni rizik koji proizlazi iz primjene standardiziranog pristupa.
This adjustment should be established at the level applied for the computation of the transitional Basel I floor based on Article 500 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Ta se prilagodba treba odrediti na razini na kojoj se izračunava prijelazni prag iz Basela I na temelju članka 500. Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013.
Benchmarks based on the standardised approach are not currently considered appropriate to be computed in the case of market risk, as they can lead to distortions.
Trenutačno se smatra da u slučaju tržišnog rizika nije primjereno izračunavati referentne vrijednosti na temelju standardiziranog pristupa jer mogu dovesti do iskrivljavanja.
Due to major methodological differences in the computation of own funds requirements according to the standardised and internal approaches, mainly due to sharp differences in aggregation or diversification of individual positions, a comparison between the two metrics under market risk for small portfolios would not provide a meaningful indication of potential underestimation of own funds requirements.
Zbog bitnih metodoloških razlika pri izračunavanju kapitalnih zahtjeva u skladu sa standardiziranim i internim pristupima, uglavnom zbog velikih razlika u pogledu agregiranja ili diversifikacije pojedinačnih pozicija, usporedbom dvaju parametara pod tržišnim rizikom za male portfelje ne bi se dobila smislena naznaka potencijalnog podcjenjivanja kapitalnih zahtjeva.
Where standardised approach computations are considered in the assessment of credit risk models, their use should be only intended as benchmarks for assessment, rather than as floors.
Ako se pri procjeni modela kreditnog rizika razmatraju izračuni prema standardiziranom pristupu, oni se trebaju upotrebljavati samo kao referentna mjerila za procjenu, a ne kao pragovi.
When assessing the overall quality of institutions' internal approaches and the degree of variability observed in particular approaches, competent authorities should not focus solely on the outcomes but should aim at determining the key variability drivers and at extracting conclusions in the different modelling approaches.
Pri procjeni sveukupne kvalitete internih pristupa institucija i stupnja odstupanja utvrđenih u konkretnim pristupima nadležna tijela ne bi se trebala usredotočiti isključivo na ishode, nego bi trebala nastojati i utvrditi ključne uzroke odstupanja i donijeti zaključke o različitim pristupima modeliranju.
Competent authorities should therefore be required to take into account the results of the alternative value-at-risk (VaR) and stressed value-at-risk (sVaR) calculations based on the profit-and-loss time-series.
Stoga bi nadležna tijela trebala obvezno uzimati u obzir rezultate alternativnih izračuna vrijednosti adherentne riziku (VaR) i vrijednosti adherentne riziku u stresnim uvjetima (sVaR) na temelju vremenskih serija podataka iz računa dobiti i gubitka.
Given that the role of the competent authorities in investigating and confirming the quality of internal approaches is fundamental, in addition to the information reported by institutions in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070, competent authorities should use the powers they have under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 for approving and reviewing internal approaches, in a proactive manner, by seeking any further information that will be useful for their on-going assessment of the quality of internal approaches.
S obzirom na ključnu ulogu nadležnih tijela pri ispitivanju i potvrđivanju kvalitete internih pristupa, nadležna tijela trebala bi pri odobravanju i reviziji internih pristupa proaktivno upotrebljavati svoje ovlasti na temelju Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013 te uz informacije koje institucije dostavljaju u skladu s Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2016/2070 zahtijevati sve dodatne podatke koje im mogu koristiti pri kontinuiranoj procjeni kvalitete internih pristupa.
For the assessment of market risk, back-testing, based both on hypothetical and actual changes in a portfolio's value, is already required to be conducted on a daily basis for the end-of-day positions of the whole portfolio, as set out in Article 366(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Za potrebe procjene tržišnog rizika retroaktivno testiranje, temeljeno na hipotetskim i stvarnim promjenama u vrijednosti portfelja, već se obvezno provodi svakog dana za pozicije na kraju dana za cijeli portfelj, kao što je propisano člankom 366. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EU) br. 575/2013.
The number of over-shootings has to be communicated to competent authorities and is regularly used to assess model performance and to determine add-on factors to the regulatory VaR and sVaR multipliers.
Nadležnim tijelima mora se dostaviti podatak o broju prekoračenja, koji se redovito koristi za procjenu učinkovitosti modela i utvrđivanje faktora uvećanja regulatornih multiplikatora VaR-a i sVaR-a.
Accordingly, no additional back-testing should be applied or assessed for the portfolios relating to market risk internal approaches.
U skladu s time, ne bi trebalo provoditi ili procjenjivati dodatno retroaktivno testiranje za portfelje povezane s internim pristupima za izračun tržišnog rizika.
The fact that the outcome of the benchmarking exercise for an individual portfolio is an extreme value or is identified in the EBA report as to be reviewed by competent authorities should not necessarily imply that the model used by the institution is incorrect or wrong.
Činjenica da je ishod postupka ocjenjivanja pojedinačnih portfelja od iznimne važnosti ili se u izvješću EBA-e navodi da ga treba ocijeniti nadležno tijelo ne bi trebala nužno podrazumijevati da je model kojim se institucija koristi nepravilan ili netočan.
In this regard the assessments conducted by competent authorities should be used as a tool to get a more in-depth knowledge of institutions' models and modelling assumptions.
U tom bi se smislu procjene koje provode nadležna tijela trebale upotrebljavati kao alati za temeljitije upoznavanje modela i pretpostavki modela institucija.