natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When, pursuant to Articles 33 and 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, Member States submit to the Commission data relating to landings of quantities of stocks caught, they shall use the stock codes set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Kada na temelju članaka 33. i 34. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1224/2009 države članice Komisiji dostavljaju podatke o iskrcanim količinama ulova, one upotrebljavaju šifre stokova koje su navedene u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.
In Annex IA to Regulation (EU) 2016/72, the entry in the table for anchovy in ICES subareas IX, X and in Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 (ANE/9/3411) is replaced by the following:
U Prilogu I.A Uredbi (EU) 2016/72, unos u tablici za inćun u potpodručjima ICES-a IX. i X. i u vodama Unije u području CECAF-a 34.1.1. (ANE/9/3411) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1
i X.; vode Unije u području CECAF-a 34.1.1.
Agreement on the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks (OJ L 189, 3.7.1998, p. 16).
Sporazum o primjeni odredaba Konvencije Ujedinjenih naroda o pravu mora od 10. prosinca 1982. u pogledu očuvanja i upravljanja pograničnim ribljim naseljima i stokovima vrlo migratornih vrsta (SL L 189, 3.7.1998., str. 16.).
In the list set out in Part 2 of this Annex, fish stocks are referred to according to the alphabetical order of the Latin names of the species.
Na popisu navedenom u dijelu 2. ovog Priloga riblji stokovi navedeni su abecednim redoslijedom latinskih imena vrsta.
However, deep-sea sharks are placed at the beginning of that list.
Međutim, dubokomorski morski psi stavljeni su na početak popisa.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following comparative table of common names and Latin names is provided:
Za potrebe ove Uredbe navodi se sljedeća usporedna tablica uobičajenih i latinskih naziva:
Great lanternshark
Veliki kostelj crnac
Annual fishing opportunities (in tonnes live weight)
Godišnje ribolovne mogućnosti (u tonama žive mase)
Union and international waters of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX
Vode Unije i međunarodne vode u zonama V., VI., VII., VIII. i IX.
Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1, 34.1.2 and 34.2
Vode Unije CECAF 34.1.1., 34.1.2. i 34.2.
Union and international waters of IX [14](SBR/09-)
vode Unije i međunarodne vode u zoni IX. [14](SBR/09-)
Exclusively for by-catches in longline fishery targeting black scabbardfish.
Isključivo za usputni ulov u ribolovu parangalom usmjeren na crnog zmijičnjaka.
No directed fishery shall be permitted.
Ne dopušta se usmjereni ribolov.
No directed fisheries are permitted under this quota.
U okviru ove kvote nije dopušten usmjereni ribolov.
No directed fisheries of roughhead grenadier are permitted.
Nije dopušten usmjereni ribolov grenadira.
By-catches of roughhead grenadier (RHG/124-) shall be counted against this quota.
Usputni ulov grenadira (RHG/124-) mora se ubrojiti u ovu kvotu.
They may not exceed 1 % of the quota.
Ne smiju premašivati 1 % kvote.
No directed fishery for roundnose grenadier shall be conducted in ICES zone IIIa.
U zoni ICES-a III.a ne smije se obavljati usmjereni ribolov tuponosoga grenadira.
By-catches of roughhead grenadier (RHG/03-) shall be counted against this quota.
Usputni ulov grenadira (RHG/03-) mora se ubrojiti u ovu kvotu.
A maximum of 10 % of each quota may be fished in Union and international waters of VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV (RNG/*8X14- for roundnose grenadier; RHG/*8X14- for roughhead grenadier by-catches)).
Najviše 10 % svake kvote smije se izloviti u vodama Unije i međunarodnim vodama u zonama VIII., IX., X., XII. i XIV. (RNG/*8X14- za tuponosog grenadira; RHG/*8X14- za usputni ulov grenadira)).
By-catches of roughhead grenadier (RHG/5B67-) shall be counted against this quota.
Usputni ulov grenadira (RHG/5B67-) mora se ubrojiti u ovu kvotu.
No directed fisheries are permitted.
Nije dopušten usmjereni ribolov.
A maximum of 10 % of each quota may be fished in Union and international waters of Vb, VI, VII (RNG/*5B67- for roundnose grenadier; RHG/*5B67- for roughhead grenadier by-catches).
Najviše 10 % svake kvote smije se izloviti u vodama Unije i međunarodnim vodama u zonama V.b, VI., VII. (RNG/*5B67- za tuponosog grenadira; RHG/*5B67- za usputni ulov grenadira).
By-catches of roughhead grenadier (RHG/8X14-) shall be counted against this quota.
Usputni ulov grenadira (RHG/8X14-) mora se ubrojiti u ovu kvotu.
Catches in the GFCM area 37.1.1 shall nevertheless be reported (SBR/F3711).
Ulovi u području GFCM-a 37.1.1 svejedno se prijavljuju (SBR/F3711).
Catches in the CECAF area 34.1.11 shall nevertheless be reported (SBR/F34111).
Ulovi u području CECAF-a 34.1.11 svejedno se prijavljuju (SBR/F34111).
A maximum of 8 % of this quota may be fished in Union and international waters of VI, VII and VIII (SBR/*678-).
Najviše 8 % ove kvote smije se izloviti u vodama Unije i međunarodnim vodama u zonama VI., VII. i VIII. (SBR/*678-).
A maximum of 8 % of this quota may be fished in Union and international waters of VIII and IX (GFB/*89-).
Najviše 8 % ove kvote smije se izloviti u vodama Unije i međunarodnim vodama u zonama VIII. i IX. (GFB/*89-).
A maximum of 8 % of this quota may be fished in Union and international waters of V, VI, VII (GFB/*567-).
Najviše 8 % ove kvote smije se izloviti u vodama Unije i međunarodnim vodama u zonama V., VI. i VII.
ICES advises that there should be no catches of orange roughy until 2020.
ICES je preporučio da ne bi smjelo biti ulova zvjezdooka do 2020.
In the past, TACs have been established for orange roughy (those TACs have been set at zero since 2010).
U prošlosti su utvrđeni TAC-ovi za zvjezdooka (ti su TAC-ovi od 2010. utvrđeni na nulu).
The fishing opportunities for anchovy in ICES subareas IX and X and in Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/72 apply from 1 January 2016.
Ribolovne mogućnosti za inćune u potpodručjima ICES-a IX. i X.; i u vodama Unije u području CECAF-a 34.1.1. predviđene Uredbom (EU) 2016/72 primjenjuju se od 1. siječnja 2016.
The amending provisions set out in this Regulation should also apply from that date.
Odredbe o izmjeni utvrđene u ovoj Uredbi trebale bi se također primjenjivati od tog datuma.
In order to avoid the interruption of fishing activities and to ensure the livelihood of the fishermen of the Union, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2017.
Kako bi se izbjegli prekidi ribolovnih aktivnosti i osigurala egzistencija ribara Unije, ovu bi Uredbu trebalo primjenjivati od 1. siječnja 2017.
However, Article 8 shall apply from 1 January 2016.
Međutim, članak 8. primjenjuje se od 1. siječnja 2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2286
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2286
laying down detailed rules on the application of fair use policy and on the methodology for assessing the sustainability of the abolition of retail roaming surcharges and on the application to be submitted by a roaming provider for the purposes of that assessment
o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila o primjeni politike pravedne uporabe, o metodologiji procjene održivosti ukidanja maloprodajnih dodatnih naknada za roaming te o zahtjevu koji podnosi pružatelj usluga roaminga za potrebe te procjene
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union [1], and in particular Article 6d(1) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 531/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 13. lipnja 2012. o roamingu u javnim pokretnim komunikacijskim mrežama u Uniji [1], a posebno njezin članak 6.d. stavak 1.,
After consulting the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC),
Nakon savjetovanja s Tijelom europskih regulatora za elektroničke komunikacije (BEREC),
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, roaming providers should not levy any surcharge additional to the domestic retail price on roaming customers in any Member State, for any regulated roaming call made or received, any regulated roaming SMS message sent or any regulated data roaming service used, including MMS messages, subject to a ‘fair use policy’.
Na temelju Uredbe (EU) br. 531/2012 pružatelji usluga roaminga, u skladu s „politikom pravedne uporabe”, ne bi korisnicima roaminga uz domaće maloprodajne cijene smjeli ni u jednoj državi članici naplaćivati nikakve dodatne naknade za dolazne ili odlazne pozive u reguliranom roamingu, poslane regulirane SMS poruke ni za regulirane podatkovne usluge u roamingu, uključujući MMS poruke.
This provision applies from 15 June 2017, provided that the legislative act to be adopted further to the proposal on the wholesale roaming market referred to in Article 19(2) of that Regulation has become applicable by that date.
Ta se odredba primjenjuje od 15. lipnja 2017., uz uvjet da se do tog dana već počeo primjenjivati zakonodavni akt koji je donesen na temelju prijedloga o veleprodajnom tržištu roaminga iz članka 19. stavka 2. te Uredbe.
Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 provides that in specific and exceptional circumstances a roaming provider may apply to its national regulatory authority for an authorisation to apply a surcharge on its roaming customers.
U Uredbi (EU) br. 531/2012 predviđeno je da u posebnim i iznimnim okolnostima pružatelj usluga roaminga može svojem državnom regulatornom tijelu poslati zahtjev za odobrenje naplate dodatne naknade svojim korisnicima roaminga.
Any such request for authorisation is to be accompanied by all the information necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of any retail roaming surcharges, the provider is unable to recover its costs of providing regulated retail roaming services, so that the sustainability of its domestic charging model is undermined.
Uz sve takve zahtjeve za odobrenje treba priložiti sve potrebne podatke kojima se dokazuje da bez maloprodajnih dodatnih naknada za usluge u roamingu pružatelj usluga ne bi mogao nadoknaditi troškove pružanja reguliranih maloprodajnih usluga roaminga, što bi ugrozilo održivost njegova domaćeg modela naplate.
In order to ensure a consistent application across the Union of any policy which aims at preventing abusive or anomalous usage of roaming services (‘fair use policy’) and of authorisations to apply a surcharge, it is necessary to lay down detailed rules on the application of such fair use policy and on the methodology for assessing the sustainability of the abolition of retail roaming surcharges and on the application to be submitted by a roaming provider for the purposes of that assessment.
Radi ujednačene primjene diljem Unije svih politika kojima je cilj sprječavanje zloporabe i prekomjerne uporabe usluga roaminga („politika pravedne uporabe”) te radi odobrenja dodatne naplate, potrebno je utvrditi detaljna pravila primjene politike pravedne uporabe, pravila u pogledu metodologije procjene održivosti ukidanja maloprodajnih dodatnih naknada za roaming te zahtjeva koji pružatelj usluga roaminga treba podnijeti u svrhu te procjene.
According to Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, the objective of a fair use policy is to prevent abusive or anomalous usage by roaming customers of regulated retail roaming services at the applicable domestic price, such as the use of such services for purposes other than periodic travel, for instance the use of such services on a permanent basis.
U skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 531/2012, politikom pravedne uporabe nastoji se spriječiti da korisnici roaminga zlorabe i prekomjerno rabe regulirane maloprodajne usluge roaminga po primjenjivim domaćim maloprodajnim cijenama, primjerice u svrhe osim povremenog putovanja, kao što je svakodnevna uporaba takvih usluga.
The implementing measures should ensure that the possibility to apply a roaming fair use policy to pursue this objective is not exploited by roaming providers for other purposes, to the detriment of roaming customers engaged in any form of periodic travel.
Provedbenim mjerama trebalo bi se osigurati da mogućnost primjene politike pravedne uporabe roaminga radi ostvarenja tog cilja pružatelji usluga roaminga ne iskorištavaju u druge svrhe na štetu korisnika roaminga koji na bilo koji način povremeno putuju.
With the abolition of retail roaming surcharges in the Union, the same tariff conditions apply for the use of mobile services while roaming abroad in the Union and at home (i.e. in the country of the mobile subscription of the customer).
Ukidanjem maloprodajnih dodatnih naknada u Uniji primjenjuju se jednaki tarifni uvjeti na uporabu mobilnih usluga u roamingu u inozemstvu unutar Unije kao u matičnoj državi (npr. u državi u kojoj korisnik ima pretplatu).
Use of regulated retail roaming services at the applicable domestic price on a permanent basis for purposes other than periodic travel would be likely to distort competition, put upward pressure on domestic prices in home markets and put at risk investment incentives in both home and visited markets.
Trajnom uporabom reguliranih maloprodajnih usluga roaminga po primjenjivim domaćim maloprodajnim cijenama osim za potrebe povremenog putovanja vjerojatno bi se narušilo tržišno natjecanje, vršio bi se pritisak povećanja domaćih cijena na domaćem tržištu te bi se ugrozili poticaji za ulaganja na domaćim i posjećenim tržištima.
On the visited market, visited operators would have to compete directly with domestic service providers of other Member States, where prices, costs, regulatory and competitive conditions may be very different, and on the basis of wholesale roaming conditions set close to cost for the sole purpose of facilitating periodic roaming.
Na posjećenim tržištima posjećeni operatori trebali bi se izravno natjecati s domaćim pružateljima usluga iz drugih država članica u kojima se cijene, troškovi, regulatorni uvjeti i uvjeti u pogledu tržišnog natjecanja mogu znatno razlikovati te na temelju uvjeta veleprodajnih usluga roaminga koji su utvrđeni isključivo za olakšavanje povremenog roaminga.
For the home operator the permanent use of domestic tariffs while roaming may lead to the denial or restriction of wholesale roaming services by visited operators, or the provision by the home operator of restricted domestic volumes or the application of higher domestic prices, with consequential effects on the home operator's ability to serve its normal domestic clients both at home and abroad.
Kad je riječ o domaćim operatorima, trajna uporaba domaćih tarifa u roamingu može dovesti do odbijanja pristupa ili do ograničenja veleprodajnih usluga roaminga od strane posjećenog operatora, do toga da domaći operator ograniči količine domaćih podataka ili do primjene viših domaćih cijena koje utječu na sposobnost domaćeg operatora da pruža usluge uobičajenim domaćim korisnicima i kod kuće i u inozemstvu.
It is necessary to lay down implementing rules based on clear and generally applicable principles capable of encompassing the many and varied patterns of periodic travel by roaming customers, in order to ensure that fair use policy does not act as a barrier to full enjoyment of ‘roam-like-at-home’ by such customers.
Potrebno je utvrditi provedbena pravila utemeljena na jasnim i općeprimjenjivim načelima koja obuhvaćaju brojne i različite obrasce povremenih putovanja korisnika roaminga kako bi se osiguralo da politika pravedne uporabe ne bude prepreka takvim korisnicima u potpunom iskorištavanju usluga „u roamingu kao kod kuće”.
For the purpose of a fair use policy to be applied by a roaming provider, a customer should ordinarily be considered to be periodically travelling abroad in the Union when that customer is normally residing in the Member State of the roaming provider or has stable links with that Member State entailing frequent and substantial presence on its territory, and consumes regulated retail roaming services in any other Member State.
Da bi pružatelj usluga roaminga primjenjivao politiku pravedne uporabe, trebalo bi se uobičajeno smatrati da korisnik povremeno putuje u inozemstvo unutar Unije kada taj korisnik uobičajeno boravi u državi članici pružatelja usluga roaminga ili ima stabilne veze s tom državom članicom zbog kojih često i dulje boravi na njezinu državnom području, a ostvaruje potrošnju reguliranih maloprodajnih usluga roaminga u bilo kojoj drugoj državi članici.
Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 provides that any fair use policy has to enable the roaming provider's customers to consume volumes of regulated retail roaming services at the applicable domestic retail price that are consistent with their respective domestic tariff plans.
Uredbom (EU) br. 531/2012 predviđeno je da se svakom politikom pravedne uporabe korisnicima pružatelja usluga roaminga mora omogućiti potrošnja količine reguliranih maloprodajnih usluga roaminga po primjenjivoj domaćoj maloprodajnoj cijeni koja je u skladu s njihovim domaćim tarifnim planovima.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the possibility for roaming providers to offer, and for roaming customers to deliberately choose, an alternative roaming tariff in accordance with Article 6e(3) of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, which could include contractual usage conditions falling outside a fair use policy established in accordance with this Regulation.
Ova Uredba ne bi trebala dovesti u pitanje mogućnost da pružatelji usluga roaminga nude, a korisnici roaminga svjesno da izaberu alternativnu tarifu za roaming u skladu s člankom 6.e stavkom 3. Uredbe (EU) br. 531/2012, što bi moglo uključivati ugovorne uvjete uporabe koji nisu obuhvaćeni politikom pravedne uporabe uspostavljene u skladu s ovom Uredbom.
In order to ensure that retail roaming services are not subjected to abusive or anomalous usage unrelated to periodic travel outside the Member State of residence of the customer or with which the customer has stable links entailing frequent and substantial presence on its territory, roaming providers may need to determine the normal place of residence of their roaming customers or the existence of such stable links.
Kako se maloprodajne usluge roaminga ne bi zlorabile ili prekomjerno rabile osim za potrebe povremenog putovanja izvan države članice boravišta korisnika ili države članice s kojom korisnik ima druge stabilne veze zbog kojih često i dulje boravi na njezinu državnom području, pružatelji usluga roaminga možda će trebati odrediti uobičajeno boravište korisnika svojih usluga roaminga ili postojanje takve stabilne veze.
Having regard to the forms of proof which are customary in the respective Member States and to the perceived level of risk of abusive or anomalous usage, the roaming provider should be able to specify the reasonable evidence of the place of residence to be provided, under the supervision of the national regulatory authority as to the proportionality of the overall documentary burden and its appropriateness in the national context.
S obzirom na uobičajene oblike dokaza u pojedinim državama članicama i percipirane razine rizika zloporabe ili prekomjerne uporabe, pružatelj usluga roaminga trebao bi, pod nadzorom državnog regulatornog tijela, moći odrediti razuman dokaz mjesta boravišta koji mu je potrebno dostaviti, a s obzirom na proporcionalnost općenitog dokumentacijskog opterećenja i njegovu prikladnosti u nacionalnom kontekstu.
Such evidence, as regards individual users, could include a declaration by the customer, presentation of a valid document confirming the customer's Member State of residence, specification of the postal address or the billing address of the customer for other services provided in the Member State of the roaming provider, a declaration by a third-level educational institution of enrolment for full-time courses, proof of registration on local electoral rolls or of payment of local/poll taxes.
Takvi dokazi mogu za individualne korisnike podrazumijevati izjavu korisnika, valjanu ispravu kojom se potvrđuje njegova država članica boravišta, poštansku adresu ili adresu naplate za druge usluge u državi članici pružatelja usluge roaminga, visokoškolske obrazovne ustanove o redovitom upisu, potvrdu o prijavi za lokalne izbore ili o plaćanju lokalnih poreza/glavarine.
In the case of business customers, such evidence could include documentation on the place of incorporation or of establishment of the corporate entity, the place of effective performance of its main economic activity, or the principal place where employees identified as using a given SIM card perform their tasks.
Za poslovne korisnike takav dokaz može podrazumijevati dokumentaciju o mjestu osnivanja ili poslovnog nastana gospodarskog subjekta, mjesto stvarnog obavljanja glavne gospodarske djelatnosti ili glavno mjesto gdje zaposlenici koji se koriste predmetnom SIM karticom obavljaju svoje poslove.
Stable links with a Member State entailing frequent and substantial presence on its territory can arise from a full-time and durable employment relationship, including that of frontier workers; durable contractual relations entailing a similar degree of physical presence of a self-employed person, participation in full-time recurring courses of study; or from other situations, such as those of posted workers or retired persons, whenever they involve an analogous level of territorial presence.
Stabilne veze s državom članicom zbog kojih korisnik učestalo i dugo boravi na njezinu državnom području mogu proizlaziti iz stalnog i trajnog radnog odnosa, među ostalim i kada je riječ o pograničnim radnicima, trajnih ugovornih odnosa koji od samozaposlene osobe zahtijevaju sličan stupanj fizičke prisutnosti, pohađanja redovnih studijskih programa ili iz drugih situacija, primjerice upućeni radnici ili umirovljenici koji u jednakoj mjeri moraju biti prisutni na tom području.
Roaming providers should limit requests for the submission of evidence of normal residence or other stable links entailing frequent and substantial presence on its territory after the conclusion of a given contract strictly to circumstances in which data that have to be collected for billing purposes appear to provide indications of abusive or anomalous usage unrelated to periodic travel.
Pružatelji usluga roaminga trebali bi zahtjeve za podnošenje dokaza o uobičajenom boravištu ili drugim stabilnim vezama zbog kojih korisnik često i dulje boravi na državnom području određene države članice nakon sklapanja predmetnog ugovora ograničiti izričito na slučajeve u kojima podaci koji se prikupljaju u svrhu naplate upućuju na zloporabu ili prekomjernu uporabu koje nisu povezane s povremenim putovanjima.
The evidence requested should only comprise what is strictly necessary and proportionate to confirm the customer's attachment to the Member State of the roaming provider.
Zatraženi dokazi trebali bi sadržavati samo ono što je nužno i razmjerno da bi se potvrdila povezanost potrošača s državom članicom pružatelja usluga roaminga.
No documentation requirements should be imposed on customers for asserting compliance with the conditions for fair use policy absent such grounds.
Od potrošača se ne bi trebala zahtijevati dokumentacija kojom se potvrđuje poštovanje uvjeta politike pravedne uporabe ako za to ne postoje navedeni razlozi.
In particular, there should be no requirement for recurrent submission of such documentation unrelated to a risk-based assessment of the probability of abusive or anomalous usage.
Posebno se ne bi trebalo zahtijevati periodično podnošenje takve dokumentacije koja nije povezana s procjenom vjerojatnosti zloporabe ili prekomjerne uporabe temeljenom na riziku.
In order to enable customers to consume volumes of regulated retail roaming services at the applicable domestic retail price that are consistent with their respective domestic tariff plans, the roaming provider should as a general rule not impose a limit on the volumes of mobile services available to the roaming customer other than the domestic limit, when that customer is periodically travelling in the Union.
Kako bi korisnicima omogućili uporabu količina reguliranih maloprodajnih usluga roaminga po primjenjivoj domaćoj maloprodajnoj cijeni koja je u skladu s njihovim domaćim tarifnim planovima, pružatelj usluga roaminga povrh domaćih ograničenja količina mobilnih usluga koje su na raspolaganju korisniku roaminga ne bi smio uvesti druga ograničenja ako predmetni korisnik povremeno putuje unutar Unije.