natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those negotiations have been successfully concluded, and the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part (‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 21 March 2017.
Ti su pregovori uspješno zaključeni, a Sveobuhvatni i pojačani sporazum o partnerstvu između Europske unije i Europske zajednice za atomsku energiju i njihovih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Armenije, s druge strane („Sporazum”) parafiran je 21. ožujka 2017.
Article 385 of the Agreement provides for the provisional application of the Agreement, in whole or in part, before its entry into force.
U članku 385. Sporazuma predviđena je privremena primjena Sporazuma u cijelosti ili djelomično, prije njegova stupanja na snagu.
The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union and applied in part on a provisional basis, pending the completion of the procedures necessary for its entry into force.
Sporazum bi trebalo potpisati u ime Unije i djelomično primjenjivati na privremenoj osnovi do završetka postupaka potrebnih za njegovo stupanje na snagu.
The signing of the Agreement on behalf of the Union and the provisional application of parts of the Agreement between the Union and the Republic of Armenia is without prejudice to the allocation of competences between the Union and its Member States in accordance with the Treaties,
Potpisivanjem Sporazuma u ime Unije i privremenom primjenom dijelova Sporazuma između Unije i Republike Armenije ne dovodi se u pitanje raspodjela nadležnosti između Unije i njezinih država članica u skladu s Ugovorima,
The signing on behalf of the Union of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement.
Odobrava se potpisivanje, u ime Unije, Sveobuhvatnog i pojačanog sporazuma o partnerstvu između Europske unije i Europske zajednice za atomsku energiju i njihovih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Armenije, s druge strane, podložno sklapanju navedenog Sporazuma.
Pending the completion of the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement, in accordance with Article 385 of the Agreement and subject to the notifications provided for therein, the following parts of the Agreement shall be applied on a provisional basis between the Union and the Republic of Armenia, but only to the extent that they cover matters falling within the Union’s competence, including matters falling within the Union’s competence to define and implement a common foreign and security policy:
Do završetka postupaka potrebnih za stupanje Sporazuma na snagu, u skladu s člankom 385. Sporazuma i podložno obavijestima koje su u njemu predviđene, sljedeći dijelovi Sporazuma primjenjuju se privremeno između Unije i Republike Armenije, ali samo u mjeri u kojoj obuhvaćaju pitanja koja su u nadležnosti Unije, uključujući pitanja u nadležnosti Unije za utvrđivanje i provedbu zajedničke vanjske i sigurnosne politike:
Chapter 1 with the exception of point (a) of Article 38(3);
i. poglavlje 1. uz iznimku članka 38. stavka 3. točke (a);
Chapter 2 with the exception of the reference to nuclear safety in point (f) of Article 42(2) and of point (g) of Article 42(2);
poglavlje 2. uz iznimku reference na nuklearnu sigurnost u članku 42. stavku 2. točki (f) i članku 42. stavku 2. točki (g);
Chapter 3 with the exception of points (a), (c) and (e) of Article 46(1); and
poglavlje 3. uz iznimku članka 46. stavka 1. točaka (a), (c) i (e); te
Title VI with the exception of points (b) and (c) of Article 205(2); Article 203 shall be applied provisionally only insofar as it concerns direct investment;
glava VI. uz iznimku članka 205. stavka 2. točaka (b) i (c); članak 203. privremeno se primjenjuje samo u mjeri u kojoj se tiče izravnog ulaganja;
Title VIII with the exception of Article 380(1), to the extent that the provisions of that Title are limited to the purpose of ensuring provisional application of the Agreement; and
glava VIII. uz iznimku članka 380. stavka 1., u mjeri u kojoj su odredbe te glave ograničene na svrhu osiguranja privremene primjene Sporazuma; i
Annex I, Annex II with the exception of the references to Euratom relating to infrastructure, implementing regulations and nuclear, Annexes III, VI, VIII, IX, X, XI and XII as well as Protocol I to Title VII financial assistance and anti-fraud and control provisions Chapter 2: anti- fraud and control provisions and Protocol II on mutual administrative assistance in customs matters.
Prilog I., Prilog II. uz iznimku referenci na Euratom povezanih s infrastrukturom, provedbenim uredbama, i nuklearnim pitanjima, prilozi III., VI., VIII., IX., X., XI. i XII. kao i Protokol I. uz glavu VII. financijska pomoć i odredbe o sprječavanju prijevara i nadzoru poglavlje 2.: odredbe o sprječavanju prijevara i nadzoru te Protokol II. o uzajamnoj administrativnoj pomoći u carinskim pitanjima.
For the purposes of Article 240 of the Agreement, any amendments to the Agreement through decisions taken by the Sub-committee on Geographical Indications shall be approved by the Commission on behalf of the Union.
Za potrebe članka 240. Sporazuma, sve izmjene Sporazuma putem odluka Pododbora za oznake zemljopisnog podrijetla odobrava Komisija u ime Unije.
Where interested parties cannot reach agreement after objections have been raised concerning a geographical indication, the Commission shall adopt a position on the basis of the procedure laid down in Article 57 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Ako zainteresirane strane ne mogu postići dogovor nakon prigovora uloženih u vezi s oznakom zemljopisnog podrijetla, Komisija donosi stajalište na temelju postupka iz članka 57. Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća.
For the purpose of the first sentence of Article 270(2) of the Agreement, the Commission is authorised to approve the Union position with regard to amendments to Annex XI to the Agreement.
Za potrebe članka 270. stavka 2. prve rečenice Sporazuma Komisija je ovlaštena odobriti stajalište Unije u pogledu izmjena Priloga XI. Sporazumu.
For the purpose of the second sentence of Article 270(2) of the Agreement, the Commission is authorised to raise objections to a modification or rectification of Annex XI proposed by the Republic of Armenia.
Za potrebe članka 270. stavka 2. druge rečenice Sporazuma Komisija je ovlaštena uložiti prigovore na izmjenu ili ispravak Priloga XI. koji predloži Republika Armenija.
The Agreement shall not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations that can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts and tribunals.
Sporazum se ne smije tumačiti kao da se njime dodjeljuju prava ili nameću obveze na koje se može izravno pozvati pred sudovima Unije ili država članica.
Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/109
Odluka Vijeća (EU, Euratom) 2018/109
appointing six members of the Court of Auditors
o imenovanju šest članova Revizorskog suda
Having regard to the proposals by the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland,
uzimajući u obzir prijedloge Republike Bugarske, Kraljevine Danske, Kraljevine Španjolske, Talijanske Republike, Portugalske Republike i Republike Finske,
Having regard to the opinions of the European Parliament,
uzimajući u obzir mišljenja Europskog parlamenta,
The terms of office of Ms Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN, Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, Mr Pietro RUSSO, Mr João FIGUEIREDO and Mr Ville ITÄLÄ are due to expire on 28 February 2018.
Mandati gđe Bettine Michelle JAKOBSEN, g. Baudilija TOMÉA MUGURUZE, g. Pietra RUSSA, g. Joãa FIGUEIREDA i g. Villea ITÄLE istječu 28. veljače 2018.
The term of office of Ms Iliana IVANOVA is due to expire on 31 December 2018.
Mandat gđe Iliane IVANOVE istječe 31. prosinca 2018.
The following are hereby appointed members of the Court of Auditors:
Članovima Revizorskog suda imenuju se sljedeće osobe:
for the period from 1 March 2018 to 29 February 2024:
za razdoblje od 1. ožujka 2018. do 29. veljače 2024.:
Ms Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN,
gđa Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN,
Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA,
g. Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA,
Mr Pietro RUSSO,
g. Pietro RUSSO,
Mr João FIGUEIREDO,
g. João FIGUEIREDO,
Mr Hannu TAKKULA;
g. Hannu TAKKULA;
for the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2024:
za razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2019. do 31. prosinca 2024.:
Ms Iliana IVANOVA.
gđa Iliana IVANOVA.
Opinions of 14 November 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mišljenja od 14. studenoga 2017.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/110
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2018/110
On 15 June 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/947, Mr João CUNHA E SILVA was replaced by Mr Mário Sérgio Quaresma GONÇALVES MARQUES as an alternate member.
Odlukom Vijeća (EU) 2015/947 15. lipnja 2015. g. Mário Sérgio Quaresma GONÇALVES MARQUES zamijenio je g. Joãoa CUNHU E SILVU u svojstvu zamjenika člana.
An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Mário Sérgio Quaresma GONÇALVES MARQUES,
Mjesto zamjenika člana Odbora regija postalo je slobodno istekom mandata g. Mária Sérgia Quaresme GONÇALVESA MARQUESA.
Ms Paula Cristina DE ARAÚJO DIAS CABAÇO DA SILVA, Secretária Regional do Turismo e Cultura da Região Autónoma da Madeira.
Gđa Paula Cristina DE ARAÚJO DIAS CABAÇO DA SILVA, Secretária Regional do Turismo e Cultura da Região Autónoma da Madeira.
Council Decision (EU) 2015/947 of 15 June 2015 appointing two Portuguese members and one Portuguese alternate member of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 154, 19.6.2015, p. 14).
Odluka Vijeća (EU) 2015/947 od 15. lipnja 2015. o imenovanju dvaju portugalskih članova i jednog portugalskog zamjenika člana Odbora regija (SL L 154, 19.6.2015., str. 14.).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/114
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2018/114
of 16 January 2018
od 16. siječnja 2018.
amending Decision 2009/11/EC authorising methods for grading pig carcasses in Spain
o izmjeni Odluke 2009/11/EZ o odobrenju metode razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova u Španjolskoj
(notified under document C(2018) 87)
(priopćeno pod brojem dokumenta C(2018) 87)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(Vjerodostojan je samo tekst na španjolskom jeziku)
Point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 provides that, for the classification of pig carcasses, the lean-meat content has to be assessed by means of grading methods authorised by the Commission and only statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcass may be authorised.
U odjeljku B.IV. točki 1.
The authorisation of grading methods should be subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment.
Priloga IV. Uredbi (EU) br. 1308/2013 predviđeno je da se pri klasiranju svinjskih trupova udio mišićnog tkiva ocjenjuje metodama razvrstavanja koje odobri Komisija te da se mogu odobriti samo metode ocjenjivanja koje su statistički dokazane i koje se temelje na fizičkom mjerenju jednog ili više anatomskih dijelova trupa svinje. Da bi se metoda razvrstavanja mogla odobriti, ona mora biti takva da se njome ne premaši najveća dopuštena statistička pogreška pri ocjenjivanju.
That tolerance is defined in Article 23(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
To je odstupanje definirano u članku 23. stavku 3. Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 1249/2008.
By Commission Decision 2009/11/EC, the use of seven methods for grading pig carcasses in Spain was authorised.
Odlukom Komisije 2009/11/EZ u Španjolskoj je odobrena primjena sedam metoda razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova.
Spain has requested the Commission to authorise one new method for grading pig carcasses on its territory and has presented a detailed description of the dissection trial, indicating the principles on which this method is based, the results of its dissection trial and the equation used for assessing the percentage of lean meat in the protocol provided for in Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
Španjolska je od Komisije zatražila odobrenje nove metode razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova na njezinu državnom području i dostavila detaljan opis postupka disekcije, naznačujući načela na kojima se temelji ta metoda, rezultate postupka disekcije i jednadžbu upotrijebljenu za procjenu postotka mišićnog tkiva u protokolu predviđenom u članku 23. stavku 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1249/2008.
This grading method should therefore be authorised in Spain.
Stoga je potrebno odobriti tu metodu razvrstavanja u Španjolskoj.
Modifications of the apparatus or grading methods should not be allowed, unless they are explicitly authorised by Commission Implementing Decision.
Izmjene uređaja ili metoda ocjenjivanja nisu dopuštene, osim ako su izričito odobrene Provedbenom odlukom Komisije.
the “Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex;
uređaj ‚Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 1. Priloga;
the “Fully automatic ultrasonic carcase grading (Autofom)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex;
uređaj ‚Fully automatic ultrasonic carcase grading (Autofom)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisani u dijelu 2. Priloga;
the “Ultrafom 300” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 3 of the Annex;
uređaj ‚Ultrafom 300’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 3. Priloga;
the “Automatic vision system (VCS2000)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 4 of the Annex;
uređaj ‚Automatic vision system (VCS2000)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisani u dijelu 4. Priloga;
the “Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex;
uređaj ‚Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 5. Priloga;
the “AutoFOM III” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex;
uređaj ‚AutoFOM III’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 6. Priloga;
the “manual method (ZP)” with a ruler and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 7 of the Annex;
‚ručna metoda (ZP)’ i s njom povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 7. Priloga;
the “CSB-Image-Meater” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 8 of the Annex.
uređaj ‚CSB-Image-Meater’ i s njim povezane metode ocjenjivanja opisane u dijelu 8. Priloga.
The manual method ZP with a ruler, referred to in point (g) of the first paragraph, shall only be authorised for abattoirs:
Upotreba ručne metode ZP s pomičnim mjerilom navedena u prvom stavku točki (g) odobrava se samo u klaonicama:
where the number of slaughters does not exceed 500 pigs per week on yearly average basis; and
u kojima se u prosjeku u godinu dana zakolje najviše 500 svinja tjedno i
having a slaughter line with a capacity to process no more than 40 pigs per hour.
koje imaju linije klanja kapaciteta za obradu najviše 40 svinja po satu.
This Implementing Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Ova je Odluka upućena Kraljevini Španjolskoj.
Done at Brussels, 16 January 2018.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 16. siječnja 2018.
Commission Decision 2009/11/EC of 19 December 2008 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Spain (OJ L 6, 10.1.2009, p. 79).
Odluka Komisije 2009/11/EZ od 19. prosinca 2008. o odobrenju metode razvrstavanja svinjskih trupova u Španjolskoj (SL L 6, 10.1.2009., str. 79.).
In the Annex to Decision 2009/11/EC the following Part 8 is added:
U Prilogu Odluci 2009/11/EZ dodaje se dio 8.:
‘Part 8
„Dio 8.
The rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “CSB-Image-Meater”.
Pravila predviđena u ovom dijelu primjenjuju se kada se razvrstavanje svinjskih trupova vrši s pomoću uređaja ‚CSB-Image-Meater’.
The CSB-Image-Meater consists in particular of a video camera, a PC equipped with an image-analysis card, a screen, a printer, a command mechanism, a rate mechanism and interfaces.
CSB Image-Meater sadržava videokameru, računalo s karticom za analizu slika, zaslon, pisač, mehanizam naredbi, mehanizam procjene i sučelja.
The 4 CSB-Image-Meater variables are all measured at the split line in the ham area (around gluteus medius muscle); the measured values are transformed into estimation of a lean meat percentage by a central unit.
Sve četiri varijable uređaja CSB-Image-Meater mjere se na rascjepnoj liniji na šunki (oko mišića gluteus medius); izmjerene vrijednosti pretvaraju se u procjenu postotka krtog mesa po središnjoj jedinici.
Ŷ = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass.
Ŷ = procijenjeni postotak krtog mesa u trupu.
F = fat thickness as thinnest layer above muscle gluteus medius (in millimetres).
F = debljina masti na najtanjem mjestu iznad mišića gluteus medius (u milimetrima).
V4F = Average fat thickness of the complete bacon layer above the four lumbar vertebra (called VaF, VbF, VcF, VdF) (in millimetres).
V4F = prosječna debljina masti sloja cjelovite slanine iznad četiri slabinska kralješka (VaF, VbF, VcF, VdF) (u milimetrima).
M = Meat thickness from the cranial edge of muscle gluteus medius and the vertebrae canal (in millimetres).
M = debljina mesa između prednjeg (kranijalnog) završetka mišića gluteus medius i kralježničkoga kanala (u milimetrima).
V4M = Average meat thickness above the four lumbar vertebra (called VaM, VbM, VcM, VdM) (in millimetres).
V4M = prosječna debljina mesa iznad četiri slabinska kralješka (VaM, VbM, VcM, VdM) (u milimetrima).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/115
Provedbena odluka Komisije (EU) 2018/115
of 24 January 2018
оd 24. siječnja 2018.
amending, as regards the location of the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre, Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/413 determining the location of the ground-based infrastructure of the system established under the Galileo programme and setting out the necessary measures to ensure that it functions smoothly, and repealing Implementing Decision 2012/117/EU
o izmjeni, kad je riječ o lokaciji Galileova centra za nadzor sigurnosti, Provedbene odluke Komisije (EU) 2016/413 o određivanju lokacija zemaljske infrastrukture sustava uspostavljenoga u okviru programa Galileo i propisivanju mjera nužnih za osiguravanje rada tog sustava te o stavljanju izvan snage Provedbene odluke 2012/117/EU
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the implementation and exploitation of European satellite navigation systems and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and in particular Article 12(3)(c) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 1285/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. prosinca 2013. o provedbi i uporabi europskih sustava za satelitsku navigaciju i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 876/2002 i Uredbe (EZ) br. 683/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, a posebno njezin članak 12. stavak 3. točku (c),
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/413 provides in its Annex that the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre (GSMC) will be spilt into two locations and will be developed in stages in France and the United Kingdom.
U Prilogu Provedbenoj odluci Komisije (EU) 2016/413 navodi se da je Galileov centar za nadzor sigurnosti (GSMC) smješten na dvjema lokacijama te je predviđeno da ga se postupno uspostavlja u Francuskoj i Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini.
On 29 March 2017 the United Kingdom notified the European Council of its intention to withdraw from the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ujedinjena Kraljevina je 29. ožujka 2017. obavijestila Europsko vijeće o svojoj namjeri povlačenja iz Unije, u skladu s člankom 50. Ugovora o Europskoj uniji.
For reasons relating to the security of the European Union and its Member States, and in particular taking into account the rules on the protection of classified information and the restrictions on the export of cryptographic equipment and PRS technology, the GSMC should be located on the territory of a Member State of the European Union.
Međutim, GSMC bi se zbog razloga povezanih sa sigurnošću Unije i njezinih država članica trebao nalaziti na području države članice Unije, uzimajući posebice u obzir pravila o zaštiti klasificiranih informacija i ograničenja izvoza kriptografske opreme i tehnologije javno reguliranih usluga (PRS).
In the guidelines adopted on 29 April 2017 following the notification by the United Kingdom, the European Council stated that the matter of the future location of the seats of EU facilities located in the United Kingdom should be settled rapidly and that arrangements should be made to facilitate their transfer.
Europsko vijeće je u smjernicama koje je slijedom obavijesti Ujedinjene Kraljevine donijelo 29. travnja 2017. navelo da pitanje budućeg sjedišta instalacija Unije smještenih u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini treba brzo riješiti i olakšati njihov premještaj.
It is thus important to make provision without delay for the transfer of the United Kingdom GSMC to the territory of another EU Member State.
Stoga je važno bez odlaganja pokrenuti postupak premještanja GSMC-a iz Ujedinjene Kraljevine na područje druge države članice Unije.
Therefore, the Commission launched an open and transparent selection procedure under Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 to determine the new location of the GSMC up to now located in the United Kingdom.
Komisija je u skladu s tim, a prema članku 12. Uredbe (EU) br. 1285/2013, pokrenula postupak otvorenog i transparentnog odabira kako bi se odredila nova lokacija za GSMC, koji je dosad bio smješten u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini.
The procedure took place in two stages: the Commission first sent the Member States a call for expression of interests, and then invited the candidate Member States to present their detailed proposals.
U tom postupku Komisija u prvoj fazi državama članicama upućuje zahtjev za iskaz interesa, a u drugoj države članice kandidatkinje poziva da predstave detaljne prijedloge.
Following the evaluation procedure, Spain's proposal was deemed to meet the assessment criteria best, given the suitability of the technical solution proposed for the provision of facilities and of services essential to the functioning of the centre, the accurate identification and management of risks, in particular risks relating to security and timing constraints, Spain's acceptance of the terms of the establishment agreement to be concluded with the Commission and the additional privileges granted, the thoroughness and transparency of the description of the construction and operating costs, and the proposal's favourable financial terms for the EU budget.
U pogledu odabranih kriterija provedene evaluacije najboljim se pokazao prijedlog Španjolske, s obzirom na relevantnost tehničkog rješenja predloženog za stavljanje instalacija na raspolaganje i pružanje usluga neophodnih za funkcioniranje centra, preciznost u utvrđivanju rizika i njihovu upravljanju, posebice rizika povezanih sa sigurnošću i s ograničenjima vremenskog rasporeda, španjolsko prihvaćanje uvjeta sporazuma o uspostavi koji se sklapa s Komisijom i dodjeljivanje dodatnih povlastica, kao i s obzirom na stupanj podrobnosti i transparentnosti opisa troškova izgradnje i funkcioniranja centra te na financijske prednosti koje prijedlog ima za proračun Unije.
It is therefore appropriate to select Spain's proposal.
Stoga bi trebalo odabrati prijedlog Španjolske.