natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under the contract, […] supplied slabs to Duferco at a price calculated as (i) the selling price of Farrell's finished products; (ii) less Farrell's manufacturing costs; (iii) plus a margin.
Na temelju tog ugovora […] je društvu Duferco isporučivao bramove po cijeni koja je izračunana kao i. prodajna cijena gotovih proizvoda društva Farrell ii. umanjena za troškove prerade društva Farrell te iii. uvećana za maržu.
This contract made it possible for the Duferco Group to cover the risk that had been transferred to it from Farrell following the agreement of 15 September 2005.
Tim je ugovorom omogućeno da na razini grupe Duferco bude pokriven rizik koji je nakon sklapanja ugovora od 15. rujna 2005. prenesen s društva Farrell na grupu Duferco.
In 2006, FSIH decided to review the business case for its stake in Duferco US.
FSIH je 2006. odlučio ponovno razmotriti svoju mogućnost sudjelovanja u društvu Duferco US.
This purchase option was granted in the context of the negotiation of the strategic partnership between Duferco and NLMK.
Ta je opcija kupnje i dio konteksta pregovora o strateškom partnerstvu između grupa Duferco i NLMK.
The inclusion of Duferco US in SIF's assets was under discussion.
Naime, bila je riječ o tome hoće li Duferco US postati dio društva SIF.
On 12 December 2006, after this purchase option was exercised by […], a company in the Duferco Group which was the successor to DII for all the rights and obligations relating to this measure, FSIH withdrew from Duferco US.
Nakon što je 12. prosinca 2006. tu opciju kupnje iskoristio […], društvo grupe Duferco koje je sljednik društva DII u pogledu svih prava i obveza povezanih s ovom mjerom, FSIH je raskinuo obveze koje je imao prema društvu Duferco US.
As a result, the Duferco Group once again became the full owner of Duferco US on 12 December 2006 for USD 125,85 million (EUR 95 million).
Prema tome, grupa Duferco ponovno je 12. prosinca 2006. postala jedini vlasnik društva Duferco US za iznos od 125,85 milijuna USD (odnosno 95 milijuna EUR).
On 18 December 2006, 50 % of the shares in SIF were transferred to NLMK.
Grupi NLMK 18. prosinca 2006. preneseno je 50 % dionica društva SIF.
MEASURE 2: STAKE IN DPH (9 APRIL 2003-14 JUNE 2006)
MJERA 2.: SUDJELOVANJE U DRUŠTVU DPH (9.4.2003. – 14.6.2006.)
On 9 April 2003, FSIH acquired from [the company which controlled DPH at the time], with registered office in […], currently in […], around 25 % of DPH's capital as well as a preferred share with a preferential right to dividends.
FSIH je 9. travnja 2003. od [društva koje je u to doba kontroliralo društvo DPH], sa sjedištem u […], danas u […], stekao oko 25 % kapitala društva DPH te jednu povlaštenu dionicu („preferred share”) kojom se ostvaruje pravo prvenstva pri isplati dividende.
FSIH had previously asked the consultancy Ernst & Young to assess the value of DPH.
FSIH je prije toga od savjetodavnog društva Ernst & Young tražio procjenu vrijednosti društva DPH.
On the basis of this assessment, the value of 25 % of DPH was between USD […] and […] million, i.e. an average value of USD […] million.
Na temelju te procjene vrijednost 25 % društva DPH iznosila je između […] i […] milijuna USD, odnosno srednja je vrijednost iznosila […] milijuna USD.
The final price of the transaction between FSIH and [the company that controlled DPH at the time] would be USD 86,42 million, or some EUR 80 million using the monthly average USD/EUR exchange rate in April 2003.
Cijena transakcije između društva FSIH i [društva koje je u to doba kontroliralo društvo DPH] iznosit će u konačnici 86,42 milijuna USD, odnosno oko 80 milijuna EUR prema prosječnom mjesečnom deviznom tečaju USD/EUR za travanj 2003.
The parties agreed that because FSIH held a preferred share, it would have a preferential right to DPH dividends as follows: (i) payment of EUR 2 million for each of the financial years 2003 and 2004; (ii) payment of EUR 4 million for every subsequent financial year until 2012.
Strane su se složile da je FSIH zbog držanja jedne povlaštene dionice imao pravo prvenstva pri isplati dividende društva DPH kako slijedi: i. isplata iznosa od 2 milijuna EUR za svaku od poslovnih godina 2003. i 2004.; ii. isplata iznosa od 4 milijuna EUR za svaku od sljedećih poslovnih godina do 2012.
In January 2005, FSIH therefore received a dividend of EUR 4 million for the 2003 and 2004 financial years.
FSIH je u siječnju 2005. tako primio dividendu od 4 milijuna EUR za poslovne godine 2003. i 2004.
No dividend seems to have been paid for the 2005 financial year.
Čini se da za poslovnu godinu 2005. nije isplaćena dividenda.
The 2006 financial year had not ended before FSIH resold its stake.
Poslovna godina 2006. nije se zatvorila dok FSIH nije prodao svoj udio.
In 2006 FSIH wanted to withdraw from DPH.
FSIH je 2006. želio raskinuti svoje obveze prema društvu DPH.
In preparation for its exit, FSIH again commissioned Ernst & Young to value its 25 % stake in DPH.
Prethodno razmatrajući svoj izlazak iz društva, FSIH je ponovno imenovao društvo Ernst & Young da procijeni vrijednost njegova 25-postotnog udjela u društvu DPH.
Ernst & Young's 2006 report (‘the Ernst & Young 2006 Report’) valued the 25 % stake at between USD […] and […] million, or some EUR […] and […] million using the annual average USD/EUR exchange rate for 2006.
U izvješću društva Ernst & Young iz 2006. („izvješće društva Ernst & Young iz 2006.”) 25-postotni udio procijenjen je na iznos od […] do […] milijuna USD, odnosno na iznos od oko […] i […] milijuna EUR na temelju prosječnog godišnjeg deviznog tečaja USD-EUR za 2006.
MEASURE 3: STAKE IN DSIH (14 DECEMBER 2006)
MJERA 3.: SUDJELOVANJE U DRUŠTVU DSIH (14.12.2006.)
In addition to steel, Duferco had developed diversification activities in Belgium, which in September 2006 were incorporated into a new subsidiary affiliated to SIF: Carsid Développement.
Osim u sektoru čelika, Duferco je u Belgiji razvijao diversificirane djelatnosti koje su u rujnu 2006. objedinjene u novo društvo kćer društva SIF: Carsid Développement.
In December 2006, several days before SIF came under the partial control of NLMK, the decision was made to remove Carsid Développement from the partnership with the Russian company.
U prosincu 2006., nekoliko dana prije nego što je NLMK stekao djelomičnu kontrolu nad društvom SIF, odlučeno je da će Carsid Développement izaći iz partnerstva s ruskim društvom.
Duferco thus joined forces with FSIH to take over and develop the assets of Carsid Développement.
Duferco se zatim udružio s društvom FSIH kako bi preuzeo i razvio imovinu društva Carsid Développement.
A new company, […], was created on 29 November 2006 to host these assets.
Novo društvo, […], osnovano je 29. studenoga 2006. radi unosa te imovine.
When it was created, its shareholder was […] and its initial share capital was EUR […] million (subscribed but not paid up apart from one share with a nominal value of one euro).
U trenutku njegova osnivanja njegov je dioničar bio […], a temeljni kapital iznosio je […] milijuna EUR (upisan, ali ne i uplaćen, osim jedne dionice nominalne vrijednosti od 1 EUR).
However, at its first meeting on 7 December 2006, the board of directors of […] accepted the transfer of the existing share of […] to FSIH.
No, upravni je odbor društva […] od prvog sastanka 7. prosinca 2006. pristao na prijenos postojeće dionice od […] na društvo FSIH.
On 7 December, FSIH and Duferco thus had a new joint subsidiary, DSIH, which was able to host the assets of Carsid Développement.
FSIH i Duferco su 7. prosinca tako imali novo zajedničko društvo kćer, DSIH, koje je moglo primiti imovinu društva Carsid Développement.
On 11 and 14 December 2006, FSIH and Duferco Développement each increased the capital of DSIH by EUR [65-72] million, corresponding to a stake of 50 %, in cash.
FSIH i Duferco Développement povećali su 11. i 14. prosinca 2006. kapital društva DSIH u gotovini za po [65 – 72] milijuna EUR, što odgovara 50-postotnom novčanom udjelu.
Duferco Diversification then held 100 % of the following three companies: Duferco Environnement, Duferco Immobilière and Marcinelle Energie.
Duferco Diversification tada je bio 100-postotni vlasnik sljedećih triju društava: Duferco Environnement, Duferco Immobilière i Marcinelle Energie.
Duferco Environnement housed a project to clean up land located in […] and belonging to Duferco Développement (the project known as […]).
Duferco Environnement uglavnom se bavio projektom sanacije zemljišta koja se nalaze u […], a koja su bila u vlasništvu društva Duferco Développement (projekt pod nazivom […]).
Duferco Immobilière included a number of property assets previously held by Carsid.
Duferco Immobilière objedinjavao je sve nekretnine koje su prije bile u vlasništvu društva Carsid.
Finally, the object of Marcinelle Energie in 2006 was to build a CCGT power station (combined cycle gas turbine) in Charleroi.
Naposljetku, predmet poslovanja društva Marcinelle Energie 2006. bila je izgradnja postrojenja s plinskim turbinama s kombiniranim ciklusom (CCGT ili plinsko-parna turbina) u Charleroiu.
Graph 1
Graf br. 1
Companies involved in Measure 3 Duferco Développement
Društva uključena u mjeru br. 3
Duferco Diversification
Duferco Diversification FSIH
FSIH
Duferco Développement
In 2008, 80 % of the Marcinelle project was sold to the Italian power company ENEL for EUR [30-37] million.
Talijanskom društvu za električnu energiju ENEL prodano je 2008. 80 % projekta Marcinelle za [30 – 37] milijuna EUR.
On 26 March 2010, Duferco Développement subscribed for an additional share in DSIH, which ensured it had majority control of DSIH with 67001 shares (compared with 67000 held by FSIH).
Duferco Développement 26. ožujka 2010. upisao je dodatnu dionicu društva DSIH, što mu je, sa 67001 dionicom (u odnosu na 67000 dionica u vlasništvu društva FSIH), osiguralo većinsku kontrolu nad društvom DSIH.
In June 2011, following the end of the partnership between Duferco and NLMK, Duferco and FSIH decided to combine all their Walloon, steel and diversification assets into one new separate subsidiary: DLP.
U lipnju 2011., nakon što je završilo partnerstvo između grupa Duferco i NLMK, Duferco i FSIH odlučili su objediniti svu svoju valonsku imovinu povezanu s industrijom čelika i diversifikacijom u jedno novo društvo kćer: DLP.
The steel assets resulting from the dismantling of SIF were affiliated to DLP through a subsidiary called Duferco La Louvière Produits Longs (‘DLLPL’, see Measure 6).
Imovina povezana s industrijom čelika koja je proizašla iz prodaje društva SIF pripojena je društvu DLP putem društva kćeri pod nazivom Duferco La Louvière Produits Longs („DLLPL”, vidjeti mjeru 6.).
A series of transactions in summer 2011 also integrated the diversification activities into DLP:
U pogledu diversificiranih djelatnosti niz radnji provedenih u ljeto 2011. doveo je i do njihove integracije u društvo DLP:
After these transactions, all of Duferco's Belgian assets (including the former assets of DSIH) were then combined in DLP through its subsidiary Duferco Belgium.
nakon tih radnji sva belgijska imovina grupe Duferco (uključujući bivšu imovinu društva DSIH) objedinjena je u društvo DLP putem društva kćeri Duferco Belgium.
MEASURES 4 AND 5: LOANS TO [THE PARENT COMPANY OF DUFERCO GROUP AT THE TIME] AND TO SIF IN 2009
MJERE 4. I 5.: ZAJMOVI IZ 2009. DODIJELJENI [DRUŠTVU KOJE JE U TOM TRENUTKU BILO NA ČELU GRUPE DUFERCO] I DRUŠTVU SIF
Now it has become the company […], incorporated under the laws of […].
Danas je ono postalo društvo […], društvo […] prava.
First, pursuant to the terms of an agreement signed on 4 September 2009, FSIH granted a loan of EUR [30-40] million.
Najprije, na temelju ugovora potpisanog 4. rujna 2009.
The rate applicable to the loan was fixed at the 12-month Euribor rate (1,302 %) plus 75 basis points, i.e. 2,052 % when the agreement was concluded.
FSIH je dodijelio zajam u iznosu od [30 – 40] milijuna EUR. Stopa koja se primjenjivala na zajam utvrđena je prema 12-mjesečnoj stopi Euribor (1,302 %), kojoj je dodano 75 baznih bodova, tj. u trenutku sklapanja tog ugovora iznosila je 2,052 %.
According to the information presented by Belgium on 4 June 2013, the rate actually adopted was 2,04 %.
Na temelju informacija koje je Belgija dostavila 4. lipnja 2013. stvarno primijenjena stopa iznosila je 2,04 %.
The principal was redeemable in full on 31 December 2015 or earlier in the event of a change in control of SIF.
Glavnica se mogla in fine vratiti do 31. prosinca 2015. ili ranije u slučaju promjene u kontroli društva SIF.
The loan interest was eligible for capitalisation annually and payable in arrears on the outstanding balance from the sixth year or earlier in the event of a change of control of SIF.
Kamatna stopa zajma mogla se godišnje kapitalizirati i platiti po dospijeću na preostali iznos duga od šeste godine ili ranije u slučaju promjene u kontroli društva SIF.
Under Article 6.1 of the loan agreement between FSIH and [the parent company of the Duferco Group at the time], in the event of a change in control of SIF, the borrower was required to allocate, as a priority, the amounts paid on this occasion towards full repayment of the loan granted by FSIH.
Na temelju članka 6.1. Ugovora o zajmu između društva FSIH i [društva koje je u tom trenutku bilo na čelu grupe Duferco], u slučaju promjene u kontroli društva SIF zajmoprimac bi bio dužan prioritetno rasporediti iznose koje je tom prilikom primio za ukupan povrat zajma koji je dodijelio FSIH.
The loan had two types of guarantees:
Zajam je bio osiguran dvjema vrstama jamstava:
the obligation to make [the parent company of the Duferco Group at the time] allocate for repayment of the loan granted by FSIH the funds from the sale of Duferco's stake in SIF to NLMK following exercise of the purchase option provided for in the agreement of 1 February 2008, and
obvezom [društva koje je u tom trenutku bilo na čelu grupe Duferco] da za povrat zajma koji je dodijelio FSIH namijeni sredstva dobivena prodajom društvu NLMK udjela grupe Duferco u društvu SIF nakon izvršenja opcije kupnje predviđene Ugovorom od 1. veljače 2008., i
a pledge on […] ordinary shares in DPH.
založnim pravom na […] redovnih dionica društva DPH.
In December 2009, an amendment was added to the loan agreement of 4 September 2009.
U prosincu 2009. izmijenjen je Ugovor o zajmu od 4. rujna 2009.
According to the information presented by Belgium on 4 June 2013, the rate actually adopted was 1,99 % when the loan was released.
Na temelju informacija koje je Belgija dostavila 4. lipnja 2013. tijekom isplate zajma stvarno primijenjena stopa iznosila je 1,99 %.
The same conditions as those of the 4 September agreement apply concerning the repayment of the loan (capital and interest).
U pogledu povrata zajma (glavnica i kamate) primjenjivali su se isti uvjeti iz Ugovora od 4. rujna.
With regard to guarantees, […] additional shares in DPH were pledged.
Kada je riječ o jamstvima, založeno je […] dodatnih dionica društva DPH.
According to Duferco's annual report for 2009, the total value of the guarantee on the two loans was approximately USD […] million.
Na temelju godišnjeg izvješća društva Duferco za 2009., ukupna vrijednost jamstva obaju zajmova iznosila je oko […] milijuna USD.
According to Belgium, the value of the guarantee corresponded to this amount if it was based only on the net assets when the loan was granted.
Prema mišljenju Belgije vrijednost tog jamstva odgovarala je tom iznosu ako se temelji samo na neto imovini u trenutku dodjele zajma.
The loan was repaid early in July 2011 due to the full takeover of SIF by NLMK.
Zajam je prijevremeno vraćen u srpnju 2011. jer je NLMK u potpunosti preuzeo društvo SIF.
According to the information presented by Belgium on 4 June 2013, the rate actually adopted was 1,99 % when the two tranches of the loan were released.
Na temelju informacija koje je Belgija dostavila 4. lipnja 2013. tijekom isplate tih dvaju obroka stvarno primijenjena stopa iznosila je 1,99 %.
The capital was repayable […].
Glavnicu je trebalo vratiti […].
The interest was […].
Kamate su bile […].
Furthermore, according to Article 5 of the loan agreement, […].
Nadalje, u skladu s člankom 5. Ugovora o zajmu […].
On 29 June 2011, the parties agreed that given the negative situation of the steel sector worldwide and the change in control of SIF, SIF had to repay the loan early in three payments spread out over 2011, 2012 and 2013.
Strane su se 29. lipnja 2011. suglasile da će, s obzirom na lošu svjetsku situaciju u sektoru čelika i na promjenu u kontroli društva SIF, potonje društvo morati prijevremeno vratiti zajam u tri obroka tijekom 2011., 2012. i 2013.
In its response to the opening decision, Belgium informed the Commission that SIF's claim to FSIH had been repaid in full.
U odgovoru na odluku o pokretanju postupka Belgija je obavijestila Komisiju da je u potpunosti vraćena tražbina koju je društvo SIF imalo prema društvu FSIH.
MEASURE 6: EUR 100 MILLION INCREASE IN CAPITAL OF DLP
MJERA 6.: POVEĆANJE KAPITALA DRUŠTVA DLP ZA 100 MILIJUNA EUR
In summer 2011, FSIH injected a total of EUR 100 million into DLP, the investment vehicle under Luxembourg law created to house the parallel investments of FSIH and Duferco in Belgium.
FSIH je tijekom ljeta 2011. dokapitalizirao društvo DLP u ukupnom iznosu od 100 milijuna EUR, što je ulagački instrument u skladu s luksemburškim pravom osnovan zbog istodobnih ulaganja društva FSIH i grupe Duferco u Belgiji.
This investment was made in two stages.
To je ulaganje provedeno u dva navrata.
First, on 29 June 2011, FSIH granted a convertible loan of EUR 30 million to DLP at a 12-month Euribor rate plus 200 basis points (2,137 % + 2 % = 4,137 %).
FSIH je najprije 29. lipnja 2011. dodijelio društvu DLP konvertibilni zajam od 30 milijuna EUR po 12-mjesečnoj stopi Euribor, kojoj je dodano 200 baznih bodova (odnosno 2,137 + 2 % = 4,137 %).
This loan was concluded for 10 years.
Taj je zajam sklopljen na deset godina.
The loan did not come with any guarantee given that the aim of the parties was to convert it into capital.
Zajam nije bio osiguran nikakvim jamstvom jer su ga strane namjeravale pretvoriti u kapital.
The conversion of the loan into capital took place on 23 September 2011.
Pretvorba zajma u kapital stvarno je provedena 23. rujna 2011.
On 7 July 2011, through its subsidiary DII, Duferco took part in a capital increase of EUR 101 million in DLP, for 50,26 % of the share capital of DLP.
Duferco je 7. srpnja 2011. putem svojeg društva kćeri DII sudjelovao u povećanju kapitala društva DLP u iznosu od 101 milijun EUR radi stjecanja 50,26 % temeljnog kapitala društva DLP.
On 14 July 2011, FSIH granted EUR 70 million to DLP through a capital increase.
FSIH je 14. srpnja 2011. putem povećanja kapitala dodijelio društvu DLP 70 milijuna EUR.
After its investment, FSIH held 49,74 % of the share capital of DLP.
Nakon svojeg ulaganja FSIH je posjedovao 49,74 % temeljnog kapitala društva DLP.
The EUR 201 million capital increase (EUR 100 million injected by FSIH and EUR 101 million injected by Duferco) was subscribed with the aim of:
Povećanje kapitala za 201 milijun EUR (100 milijuna EUR koje je FSIH dokapitalizirao i 101 milijun EUR koji je dokapitalizirao Duferco) upisano je u svrhu:
purchasing the stock of Duferco La Louvière Sales [11] for EUR [50-70] million;
kupnje zaliha društva Duferco La Louvière Sales [11] za [50 – 70] milijuna EUR;
investing EUR [30-40] million in DLLPL, which became Duferco Belgium, to produce a new continuous casting line.
ulaganja [30 – 40] milijuna EUR u društvo DLLPL, koje je postalo Duferco Belgium, za proizvodnju novog kontinuiranog lijeva.
In December 2012, the decision was made to split the steel activities (which were mostly inactive) and non-steel activities of Duferco in the Walloon Region again.
U prosincu 2012. odlučeno je da će se ponovno odvojiti djelatnosti društva Duferco u Valoniji koje su povezane s čelikom (koje su većinom ugašene) od onih koje nisu povezane s čelikom.
Duferco Belgium kept the steel activities, while the diversification activities were taken by a new DLP subsidiary, Duferco Wallonie.
Duferco Belgium zadržat će djelatnosti povezane s čelikom, dok će novo društvo kći društva DLP objedinjavati diversificirane djelatnosti: Duferco Wallonie.
Following this restructuring, the organisation chart of the company was as follows:
Nakon te reorganizacije organizacijska shema grupe izgledala je kako slijedi:
Graph 2
Graf br. 2
Companies involved in Measure 6
Društva uključena u mjeru br. 6
SUMMARY OF DOUBTS RAISED IN THE OPENING DECISION
SAŽETAK SUMNJI IZNESENIH U ODLUCI O POKRETANJU POSTUPKA
MEASURE 1
MJERA 1.
The Commission points out that its doubts did not concern the conditions under which FSIH had acquired its stake in Duferco US.
Komisija podsjeća da se njezine sumnje nisu odnosile na uvjete u kojima je FSIH stekao svoj udio u društvu Duferco US.
On the other hand, the Commission doubted whether the conditions under which FSIH had allowed its stake in Duferco US to be terminated were in line with the market economy investor principle.
Naprotiv, Komisija je sumnjala u to da su uvjeti pod kojima je FSIH prestao sudjelovati u društvu Duferco US bili u skladu s načelom privatnog ulagača u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
It put forward several arguments in support of its concerns.
Kako bi potkrijepila svoje sumnje, Komisija je iznijela razne argumente.
First, the sale price in euros was the same in 2006 as the acquisition price in 2003, which suggests mediocre profitability over the holding period.
Najprije, prodajna cijena u eurima bila je u 2006. jednaka kupovnoj cijeni u 2003., što upućuje na nižu profitabilnost u razdoblju sudjelovanja u društvu.
The Commission was surprised by this, given the positive results obtained by Duferco US between 2003 and 2006, and the consequent increase in its own funds.
Komisiju je to iznenadilo s obzirom na pozitivne poslovne rezultate koje je Duferco US ostvario od 2003. do 2006. te na kasnije povećanje njegova vlasničkog kapitala.
In this respect, the Commission challenged Belgium's opinion that the return on the stake should be evaluated in US dollars (the functional currency of Duferco US) and not in euros (the functional currency of FSIH).
Komisija je u tom pogledu osporavala mišljenje Belgije da je prinos od udjela trebalo procijeniti u američkim dolarima (funkcionalnoj valuti društva Duferco US), a ne u eurima (funkcionalnoj valuti društva FSIH).
Second, the Commission was surprised that no valuation had been made before the option exercise price was set.
Zatim je Komisiju iznenadilo što nije provedeno vrednovanje prije utvrđivanja izvršne cijene opcije.
The Commission also questioned the motives behind FSIH's withdrawal, particularly its perception of an economic downturn for the coming years.
Komisija je preispitivala i razloge društva FSIH za raskid obveza te osobito njegov pogled na pogoršanje konjunkture u nadolazećim godinama.
In this respect, the Commission doubted that a private investor would have agreed to such a long option (almost 10 years), even though they claimed to anticipate an imminent economic downturn.
U tom je pogledu Komisija sumnjala u to da bi privatni ulagač pristao na toliko dugu opciju (gotovo deset godina), unatoč tome što je tvrdio da predviđa nadolazeće pogoršanje konjunkture.
It also noted that the agreements of 2005 and 2006, concluded with Duferco and […] respectively, reduced the exposure of Duferco US to market fluctuations and therefore helped make it more attractive.
Osim toga, napomenula je da je ugovorima iz 2005. i 2006., sklopljenima s grupom Duferco odnosno s […], smanjena izloženost društva Duferco US promjenama na tržištu i da je tako pospješena njegova atraktivnost.
Finally, the Commission was surprised that the purchase option had been granted at no cost when it had a certain economic value for the Duferco Group, which could exercise it to suit its interests.
Naposljetku, Komisiju je iznenadilo to što je opcija kupnje dodijeljena bez naknade, iako je ona za grupu Duferco imala određenu gospodarsku vrijednost koju je grupa mogla bolje iskoristiti.
MEASURE 2
MJERA 2.