natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
TRINITY (previous names according to NAFO, SEAFO: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTE NOVA, JAWHARA; previous names according to NEAFC: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTENOVA, JAWHARA)
TRINITY (prijašnja imena prema NAFO-u, SEAFO-u: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTE NOVA, JAWHARA; prijašnja imena prema NEAFC-u: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTENOVA, JAWHARA)
Unknown [according to NAFO, NEAFC, SEAFO], Ghana [according to GFCM] (latest known flags according to NAFO: Ghana, Panama; latest known flags according to NEAFC: Ghana, Panama, Morocco)
Nepoznato [prema NAFO-u, NEAFC-u, SEAFO-u], Gana [prema GFCM-u] (zadnje poznate zastave prema NAFO-u: Gana, Panama; zadnje poznate zastave prema NEAFC-u: Gana, Panama, Maroko)
WEN TENG No. 688/MAHKOIA ABADI No. 196
WEN TENG br. 688/MAHKOIA ABADI br. 196
YELE [according to CCAMLR], RAY [according to GFCM, NEAFC, SEAFO] (previous names according to CCAMLR: RAY, KILY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; previous names according to GFCM: KILLY, TROPIC, CONSTANT, ISLA RACIOSA; previous names according to NEAFC: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; previous names according to SEAFO: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPICS, ISLA GRACIOSA)
YELE [prema CCAMLR-u], RAY [prema GFCM-u, NEAFC, SEAFO] (prijašnja imena prema CCAMLR-u: RAY, KILY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; prijašnja imena prema GFCM-u: KILLY, TROPIC, CONSTANT, ISLA RACIOSA; prijašnja imena prema NEAFC-u: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; prijašnja imena prema SEAFO-u: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPICS, ISLA GRACIOSA)
Sierra Leone [according to CCAMLR], Belize [according to NEAFC, SEAFO] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Belize, Equatorial Guinea, South Africa; latest known flags according to NEAFC: South Africa, Equatorial Guinea, Mongolia)
Sijera Leone [prema CCAMLR-u], Belize [prema NEAFC-u, SEAFO-u] (zadnje poznate zastave prema CCAMLR-u: Belize, Ekvatorska Gvineja, Južna Afrika; zadnje poznate zastave prema NEAFC-u: Južna Afrika, Ekvatorska Gvineja, Mongolija)
YUTUNA 3 (previous names: HUNG SHENG No. 166)
YUTUNA 3 (prijašnja imena: HUNG SHENG br. 166)
YUTUNA No. 1
YUTUNA br.1
ZEMOUR 1 [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], HUIQUAN/WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44 [according to GFCM], SONGHUA [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (previous names according to CCAMLR: KADEI, SONGHUA, YUNNAN, NIHEWAN, HUIQUAN, WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44, YANGZI HUA 44, TROSKY, PALOMA V; previous name according to ICCAT, IOTC: YUNNAN; previous name according to SEAFO: SONGHUA)
ZEMOUR 1 [prema CCAMLR-u, SEAFO-u], HUIQUAN/WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44 [prema GFCM-u], SONGHUA [prema ICCAT-u, IOTC] (prijašnja imena prema CCAMLR-u: KADEI, SONGHUA, YUNNAN, NIHEWAN, HUIQUAN, WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44, YANGZI HUA 44, TROSKY, PALOMA V; prijašnje ime prema ICCAT-u, IOTC-u: YUNNAN; prijašnje ime prema SEAFO-u: SONGHUA)
Mauritania [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzania [according to GFCM], Unknown [according to ICCAT, IOTC], Equatorial Guinea [according to ICCAT] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Equatorial Guinea, Indonesia, Tanzania, Mongolia, Cambodia, Namibia, Uruguay; latest known flag according to ICCAT, IOTC: Equatorial Guinea)
Mauritanija [prema CCAMLR-u, SEAFO-u], Tanzanija [prema GFCM-u], nepoznato [prema ICCAT-u, IOTC-u], Ekvatorska Gvineja [prema ICCAT-u] (zadnje poznate zastave prema CCAMLR-u: Ekvatorska Gvineja, Indonezija, Tanzanija, Mongolija, Kambodža, Namibija, Urugvaj; zadnja poznata zastava prema ICCAT-u, IOTC-u: Ekvatorska Gvineja)
ZEMOUR 2 [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], SHAANXI HENAN 33 [according to GFCM], YONGDING [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (previous names according to CCAMLR: LUAMPA, YONGDING, CHENGDU, JIANGFENG, SHAANXI HENAN 33, XIONG NU BARU 33, DRACO I, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, SEO YANG No. 88, CARRAN; previous names according to GFCM: XIONG NU BARU 33, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, CARRAN, DRACO-1; previous name according to ICCAT, IOTC: JIANGFENG; previous name according to SEAFO: YONDING)
ZEMOUR 2 [prema CCAMLR-u, SEAFO-u], SHAANXI HENAN 33 [prema GFCM-u], YONGDING [prema ICCAT-u, IOTC-u] (prijašnja imena prema CCAMLR-u: LUAMPA, YONGDING, CHENGDU, JIANGFENG, SHAANXI HENAN 33, XIONG NU BARU 33, DRACO I, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, SEO YANG br. 88, CARRAN; prijašnja imena prema GFCM-u: XIONG NU BARU 33, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, CARRAN, DRACO-1; prijašnje ime prema ICCAT-u, IOTC-u: JIANGFENG; prijašnje ime prema SEAFO-u: YONDING)
Mauritania [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzania [according to GFCM], Unknown [according to ICCAT], Equatorial Guinea [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Equatorial Guinea, Indonesia, Tanzania, Panama, Sierra Leone, North Korea (DPRK), Togo, Republic of Korea, Uruguay)
Mauritanija [prema CCAMLR-u, SEAFO-u], Tanzanija [prema GFCM-u], nepoznato [prema ICCAT-u], Ekvatorska Gvineja [prema ICCAT-u, IOTC-u] (zadnje poznate zastave prema CCAMLR-u: Ekvatorska Gvineja, Indonezija, Tanzanija, Panama, Sijera Leone, Sjeverna Koreja (DPRK), Togo, Republika Koreja, Urugvaj)
For any additional information consult the websites of the regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs).
Dodatne informacije dostupne su na internetskim stranicama regionalnih organizacija za upravljanje ribarstvom (RFMO).
The vessel ‘Viking’ [10], which is currently included in the Union list, has been removed from the list established by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (‘CCAMLR’), since it had been sunk by the Indonesian authorities on 14 March 2016.
Plovilo „Viking” [10], koje se trenutačno nalazi na popisu Unije, uklonjeno je s popisa koji je utvrdila Komisija za očuvanje antarktičkih morskih živih resursa („CCAMLR”) jer su ga potopile indonezijske vlasti 14. ožujka 2016.
That vessel should thus be removed from the Union list despite the fact that it has not yet been deleted from the list established by the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (‘GFCM’).
Stoga bi se to plovilo trebalo ukloniti s popisa Unije iako nije još uklonjeno s popisa koji je uspostavila Opća komisija za ribarstvo u Sredozemnome moru („GFCM”).
FU HSIANG FA 18
FU HSIANG FA 18.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2179
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/2179
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz keramičkih pločica podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine nakon revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1], and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije [1], a posebno njezin članak 11. stavak 2.,
Following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed, by means of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘China’ or ‘country concerned’).
Nakon antidampinškog ispitnog postupka („početni ispitni postupak”) Vijeće je Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 917/2011 [2] uvelo konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz keramičkih pločica podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK” ili „Kina” ili „predmetna zemlja”).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty and the duty levels imposed ranged from 13,9 % [3] to 36,5 % for cooperating producers.
Mjere su bile u obliku pristojbe ad valorem, a uvedene razine pristojbe kretale su se u rasponu od 13,9 % [3] do 36,5 % za proizvođače koji surađuju.
Furthermore, a country-wide duty rate of 69,7 % was imposed on Chinese companies which either did not make themselves known or did not cooperate with the investigation.
Nadalje, uvedena je stopa pristojbe od 69,7 % na razini zemlje za kineska društva koja se nisu javila ili nisu surađivala u ispitnom postupku.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [4] of the anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of the measures in force pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (‘the basic Regulation’) (‘the request’).
Nakon objave obavijesti o predstojećem isteku [4] antidampinških mjera na snazi Komisija je zaprimila zahtjev za pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 („osnovna uredba”) („zahtjev”).
The request was lodged by the European Ceramic Tile Manufacturers' Federation (‘the applicant’ or ‘CET’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of ceramic tiles.
Zahtjev je podnio Europski savez proizvođača keramičkih pločica („podnositelj zahtjeva” ili „CET”) u ime proizvođača koji čine više od 25 % ukupne proizvodnje keramičkih pločica u Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and continuation or recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtjev se temeljio na činjenici da bi istekom mjera vjerojatno došlo do nastavka ili ponavljanja dampinga i nastavka ili ponavljanja štete za industriju Unije.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 13 September 2016, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Nakon što je utvrdila da postoje dostatni dokazi za pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera, Komisija je 13. rujna 2016. objavljivanjem obavijesti u Službenom listu Europske unije [5] („Obavijest o pokretanju postupka”) najavila pokretanje revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Ispitnim postupkom o vjerojatnosti nastavka ili ponavljanja dampinga i štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. srpnja 2015. do 30. lipnja 2016. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka revizije” ili „RIPR”).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Ispitivanjem kretanja važnih za procjenu vjerojatnosti ponavljanja štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2013. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije („razmatrano razdoblje”).
The Commission advised the applicants, other known Union producers, exporting producers in the PRC, known importers, users and traders known to be concerned, associations representing Union producers and users and representatives of the exporting countries of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o pokretanju revizije zbog predstojećeg isteka mjera obavijestila podnositelje zahtjeva, ostale poznate proizvođače iz Unije, proizvođače izvoznike iz NRK-a, poznate uvoznike, korisnike i trgovce za koje se zna da se na njih odnosi ispitni postupak, udruženja koja predstavljaju proizvođače iz Unije i predstavnike zemalja izvoznica.
Interested parties were given opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresiranim stranama pružena je prilika da iznesu svoja stajališta u pisanom obliku i zatraže saslušanje u roku utvrđenom u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
The Union producers, represented by the applicant, took this opportunity to request that their names are kept confidential for fear that they could face retaliation by customers or competitors implicated by this investigation, in line with Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation.
Proizvođači iz Unije, koje predstavlja podnositelj zahtjeva, iskoristili su tu priliku kako bi u skladu s člankom 19. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe zatražili da njihovi nazivi budu povjerljivi zbog straha od moguće odmazde kupaca ili konkurenata na koje utječe ovaj ispitni postupak.
The Commission individually examined each of these confidentiality requests for merit thereof.
Komisija je pojedinačno ispitala osnovanost svakog od tih zahtjeva za povjerljivošću.
It established that there was indeed evidence of a significant possibility of retaliation in each case and accepted that the names of these companies should not be disclosed.
Utvrdila je da zaista postoje dokazi o znatnoj mogućnosti odmazde u svakom slučaju i prihvatila da se nazivi tih društava ne otkriju.
The Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (the ‘CCCMC’) requested a hearing.
Kineska trgovačka komora uvoznika i izvoznika metala, minerala i kemikalija („CCCMC”) zatražila je saslušanje.
The hearing took place on 6 December 2016.
Ono se održalo 6. prosinca 2016.
At the hearing and in the subsequent submissions the CCCMC requested full access to the dumping margin, price effects, injury margin and injury indicators calculations, and any other confidential information on which calculations were based.
CCCMC je na saslušanju i u naknadnim podnescima zatražio potpuni pristup izračunima dampinške marže, utjecajâ na cijenu, marže štete i pokazatelja štete te svim ostalim povjerljivim informacijama na kojima su se temeljili izračuni.
The CCCMC argued that the lawyers that would be granted the access are registered at a European bar association and are subject to strict bar rules and disclosing confidential information to their clients would result in severe disciplinary actions, including disbarment and potential criminal action.
CCCMC je tvrdio da su odvjetnici kojima bi bio odobren pristup upisani u neku od europskih odvjetničkih komora i podliježu njezinim strogim pravilima te bi otkrivanje povjerljivih informacija klijentima dovelo do oštrih disciplinskih mjera, uključujući njihovo isključivanje iz odvjetničke komore i moguće pokretanje kaznenog postupka.
Therefore, the CCCMC argued that the access to the confidential file would not breach the Commission's obligation to protect confidential information whilst allowing an effective exercise of the rights of defence.
Stoga je CCCMC tvrdio da odobravanjem pristupa povjerljivom spisu Komisija ne bi povrijedila svoju obvezu zaštite povjerljivih informacija, a istodobno bi omogućila učinkovito ostvarivanje pravâ na obranu.
Article 19 of the basic Regulation stipulates that the Commission must not reveal any information which is by nature confidential without specific permission from the supplier of such information.
Člankom 19. osnovne uredbe propisano je da Komisija ne smije otkriti povjerljive podatke bez posebnog odobrenja pružatelja tih podataka.
It does not envisage that any other party, including lawyers registered at a European bar association, is granted the access.
Njime nije predviđeno odobravanje pristupa nijednoj drugoj stranci, uključujući odvjetnike upisane u europsku odvjetničku komoru.
Furthermore, the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice reveals that the protection of rights of the defence must be, where necessary, reconciled with the principle of confidentiality, which is specifically laid down in Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Nadalje, iz sudske prakse Suda proizlazi da zaštita pravâ na obranu mora prema potrebi biti usklađena s načelom povjerljivosti, koje je posebno utvrđeno u članku 19. osnovne uredbe [6].
While that reconciliation permits the receipt of non-confidential summaries of such information (carried out, for instance, in the form of ranges and/or indexed elements of information) where that information would not lead to a disclosure of business secrets, it is not absolute.
Iako je na temelju tog usklađivanja dopušteno zaprimanje sažetaka informacija koji nisu povjerljivi (na primjer u obliku rasponâ i/ili indeksiranih dijelova podataka) ako takve informacije ne bi dovele do otkrivanja poslovnih tajni, ono nije apsolutno.
Accordingly, and while the CCCMC could have been granted access to, for instance, ranges and/or indexed elements of the information requested, full disclosure of that information was not deemed reconcilable with the duty to protect confidential information.
Shodno tomu, iako se CCCMC-u mogao odobriti pristup, na primjer, rasponima i/ili indeksiranim dijelovima zatraženih informacija, nije se smatralo da je potpuno otkrivanje tih informacija usklađeno s dužnošću zaštite povjerljivih informacija.
In like measure, and because the Union legislator did not foresee this exception in the basic Regulation, the Commission considered that the fact that the lawyers registered at a European bar association are subject to strict bar rules and are potentially subject to sanctions in case of breach of these rules does not allow the Commission services to grant access contrary to the applicable legislation.
U istoj je mjeri, i budući da zakonodavac Unije nije predvidio takvo izuzeće u osnovnoj uredbi, Komisija smatrala da činjenicom da odvjetnici koji su upisani u europsku odvjetničku komoru podliježu njezinim strogim pravilima i mogućim sankcijama u slučaju povrede tih pravila službama Komisije nije dopušteno odobriti pristup u suprotnosti s primjenjivim zakonodavstvom.
The Commission thus concluded that the access to confidential information by lawyers registered at a European bar association could not be granted.
Stoga je Komisija zaključila da se odvjetnicima koji su upisani u europsku odvjetničku komoru ne može odobriti pristup povjerljivim informacijama.
In any case, an additional element for safeguarding, in this respect, the rights of defence of interested parties, is the possibility of having recourse to the Hearing Officer in Trade Proceedings under Article 15 of his terms of reference [7] who did not call into question the Commission's position on confidentiality.
U svakom slučaju, dodatni element zaštite pravâ na obranu zainteresiranih strana u tom pogledu jest mogućnost obraćanja službeniku za saslušanja u trgovinskim postupcima u skladu s člankom 15. njegova opisa poslova [7], koji nije doveo u pitanje stajalište Komisije o povjerljivosti.
Hence, the Commission deemed the information provided in the disclosure documents sufficient to satisfy the former's rights of defence.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da su informacije navedene u dokumentima o objavi dovoljne za ispunjavanje njegovih pravâ na obranu.
On the basis of information provided by the applicant, the Commission found that the PRC ceramic industry was largely fragmented with 1452 producers in 2014.
Na temelju informacija koje je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva Komisija je utvrdila da je keramička industrija NRK-a 2014. bila u velikoj mjeri rascjepkana i obuhvaćala je 1452 proizvođača.
Therefore, in view of the apparently large number of exporting producers in the PRC, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of Initiation.
Stoga je, s obzirom na očito velik broj proizvođača izvoznika u NRK-u, u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka predviđen odabir uzorka.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od svih proizvođača izvoznika iz NRK-a koji su joj poznati zatražila da dostave informacije navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
In addition, it asked the mission of the PRC to the Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Osim toga, zatražila je od misije NRK-a pri Uniji da utvrdi ostale proizvođače izvoznike koji bi mogli biti zainteresirani za sudjelovanje u ispitnom postupku, ako postoje, i/ili da s njima stupi u kontakt.
In total, the information specified in the Notice of Initiation was sent to 119 companies in the PRC.
Informacije navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka poslane su na ukupno 119 društava iz NRK-a.
Nineteen producers or group of producers in the PRC provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Devetnaest proizvođača ili skupina proizvođača iz NRK-a dostavilo je zatražene informacije i pristalo da ih se uključi u uzorak.
Given the number of companies which could have come forward, this was considered low cooperation.
S obzirom na broj društava koja su mogla dostaviti informacije, razina suradnje smatrala se niskom.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission provisionally selected a sample of four groups of exporting producers on the basis of their declared volume of exports to the Union during the review investigation period and their production capacity which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija je u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe odabrala privremeni uzorak od četiriju skupina proizvođača izvoznika na temelju njihova prijavljenog obujma izvoza u Uniju tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije i njihova proizvodnog kapaciteta koji su se razumno mogli ispitati u raspoloživom razdoblju.
Following the disclosure to interested parties of this provisional sample, the group of exporting producers with the largest production capacity withdrew its cooperation.
Nakon objave privremenog uzorka zainteresiranim stranama skupina proizvođača izvoznika s najvećim proizvodnim kapacitetom povukla je svoju suradnju.
Thus, the proposed sample was amended by adding the exporting producer with the second largest production capacity.
Stoga je predloženi uzorak izmijenjen dodavanjem proizvođača izvoznika s drugim najvećim proizvodnim kapacitetom.
Following the disclosure of the amended sample to the interested parties, no comments were received.
Nakon objave izmijenjenog uzorka zainteresiranim stranama nisu zaprimljene nikakve primjedbe.
Therefore, the sampling proposal was confirmed in accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation.
Stoga je prijedlog za odabir uzorka potvrđen u skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe.
The four sampled groups of exporting producers had an annual production of 55 million m2 of the product concerned, representing around 34 % of the overall declared production and sales of all cooperating exporting producers or groups of exporting producers of the product concerned to the Union.
Četiri skupine proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku proizvodile su 55 milijuna m2 predmetnog proizvoda godišnje, što je činilo oko 34 % ukupne prijavljene proizvodnje i prodaje svih proizvođača izvoznika ili skupina proizvođača izvoznika predmetnog proizvoda koji surađuju u Uniji.
The four sampled groups covered around 8 % of the total Chinese exports to the Union according to Eurostat in the review investigation period.
U skladu s podacima Eurostata tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka revizije četiri skupine u uzorku činile su oko 8 % ukupnog kineskog izvoza u Uniju.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales and production, taking into account geographical spread and also the high fragmentation of the ceramic tiles industry in line with the methodology detailed below in recitals (20) to (21).
U skladu s člankom 17. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala uzorak na temelju najvećeg reprezentativnog obujma prodaje i proizvodnje, uzimajući u obzir zemljopisnu rasprostranjenost i veliku rascjepkanost industrije keramičkih pločica u skladu s metodologijom koja je detaljno opisana u nastavku u uvodnim izjavama od 20. do 21.
In the original investigation the Commission concluded that the ceramic tiles sector is very fragmented.
U početnom ispitnom postupku Komisija je zaključila da je sektor keramičkih pločica vrlo rascjepkan.