natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, aside from the CDSP and its amendments, which apply only to VTAN, none of these acts lays down arrangements for calculating and reviewing any financial compensation mechanism.
Međutim, osim ugovora CDSP i njegovih izmjena što se primjenjuju samo na društvo VTAN, nijednim od tih akata nisu utvrđena detaljna pravila za izračun i preispitivanje bilo kojeg mehanizma financijske naknade.
As a result, the acts having assigned obligations to the CCI-Airport do not meet the requirements of the first Altmark condition, even regardless of the fact that the obligations imposed on the CCI-Airport do not form a genuine SGEI.
Stoga akti kojima su obveze povjerene odjelu CCI-zračna luka ne ispunjavaju zahtjeve prvog uvjeta iz presude Altmark, čak i neovisno o činjenici da obveze koje ima CCI-zračna luka nisu autentične usluge od općega gospodarskog interesa.
Compensation parameters established in advance in an objective and transparent manner (second condition)
Parametri naknade unaprijed utvrđeni na objektivan i transparentan način (drugi uvjet)
CCI-Airport operating period (2000-2006)
Razdoblje upravljanja odjela CCI-zračna luka (2000. – 2006.)
The exceptional subsidies and repayable advances received by the CCI-Airport were all exceptional measures granted on an ad hoc basis to finance the airport’s operating deficit.
Sve su jednokratne subvencije i povratni predujmovi koje je primio odjel CCI-zračna luka jednokratne mjere koje su postupno dodjeljivane u svrhu financiranja operativnog manjka Zračne luke.
They did not therefore stem from calculation parameters that were established in advance.
Stoga te mjere ne proizlaze iz unaprijed utvrđenih parametara izračuna.
Likewise, the Concession Agreement, which defined the CCI-Airport’s obligations for the period from February to December 2006, also did not provide for any financial compensation mechanism for the operator.
Usto, Ugovorom o koncesiji, kojim su utvrđene obveze odjela CCI-zračna luka za razdoblje od veljače do prosinca 2006., nije predviđen ni mehanizam financijske naknade u korist upravitelja.
As a result, the financial support measures granted to the CCI-Airport do not satisfy the second Altmark condition.
Stoga mjere financijske potpore dodijeljene odjelu CCI-zračna luka ne ispunjavaju drugi uvjet iz presude Altmark.
VTAN operating period (2007-2012)
Razdoblje upravljanja društva VTAN (2007. – 2012.)
The compensation paid to VTAN by the SMAN was granted under the CDSP and its annexes, which stipulated the obligations of both parties within the airport operation task and which defined the arrangements for calculating the flat-rate contribution paid to VTAN by the SMAN.
Naknade koje je sindikat SMAN platio društvu VTAN dodijeljene su na temelju ugovora CDSP i njegovih priloga u kojima su navedene obveze obaju strana u okviru zadatka upravljanja te načini izračuna paušalnog doprinosa koji je sindikat SMAN platio društvu VTAN.
However, the arrangements for calculating this contribution were subsequently altered by four amendments.
Međutim, načini izračuna tog doprinosa izmijenjeni su a posteriori četirima izmjenama, ugovora.
In particular, amendment No 3 to the CDSP provided for the SMAN to grant VTAN a subsidy of EUR [100000-300000] for 2009 and specifically altered the wording of Clause 27-4 of the CDSP, which from that date stipulated that ‘the flat-rate contribution may be increased by the amount of subsidies received by the Delegating Authority from other authorities’.
Konkretno, izmjenom br. 3. ugovora CDSP predviđeno je da sindikat SMAN dodijeli društvu VTAN subvenciju od [100000 – 300000] EUR za 2009. te je, prije svega, unesen novi tekst odredbe 27-4 ugovora CDSP kojim je od tog datuma propisano da „paušalni doprinos može biti uvećan za iznos subvencija koje je primilo tijelo koje dodjeljuje ovlasti od drugih tijela”.
Amendment No 3 therefore introduced new calculation parameters, which were not objective because they were unconnected with VTAN’s costs and revenues.
Tako su izmjenom br. 3 uvedeni novi parametri izračuna koji nisu objektivni jer se ne odnose na troškove i prihode društva VTAN.
As a result, the flat-rate contribution does not satisfy the second Altmark condition.
Stoga paušalni doprinos ne ispunjava drugi uvjet iz presude Altmark.
The specific public contribution and equipment subsidies referred to in recital 565 also do not satisfy this condition because they involved exceptional financial support that was not established at the start.
Poseban javni doprinos i subvencije za opremu, navedeni u uvodnoj izjavi 565. ne ispunjavaju taj kriterij jer je riječ o jednokratnim financijskim potporama koje nisu bile prvotno predviđene.
Arrangements for selecting the service provider (fourth condition)
Načini odabira pružatelja usluge (četvrti uvjet)
The CCI was not chosen to operate the airport following an invitation to tender procedure and the Commission does not have any information indicating that the amounts of the financial support measures that it received may have been determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided with the relevant means, would have incurred.
Budući da komora CCI nije bila odabrana za upravljanje Zračnom lukom na temelju postupka javnog natječaja, Komisija ne raspolaže nijednim elementom koji upućuje na to da je iznose mjera financijske potpore koje je komora primila bilo moguće utvrditi na temelju analize troškova koje bi snosio tipičan poduzetnik koji ima dobru upravu i odgovarajuća potrebna sredstva.
As a result, the financial support measures granted to the CCI-Airport do not satisfy the fourth Altmark condition.
Stoga mjere financijske potpore dodijeljene odjelu CCI-zračna luka ne ispunjavaju četvrti uvjet iz presude Altmark.
Veolia Transport was selected following a negotiated procedure, which was preceded by a notice of a competitive public tender published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Veolia Transport odabrana je na temelju provedbe javne nabave uz pregovarački postupak kojem je prethodila objava javnog nadmetanja u Službenom listu Europske unije.
Under EU law, the French authorities therefore had recourse to a negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice.
U smislu prava Unije, francuska su tijela provela postupak javne nabave uz pregovarački postupak s prethodnom objavom poziva na nadmetanje.
The Commission generally takes the view that a negotiated procedure with prior publication can be deemed to satisfy the fourth Altmark condition only in exceptional cases.
Komisija općenito smatra da se samo u iznimnim slučajevima može smatrati da postupak javne nabave uz pregovarački postupak s prethodnom objavom ispunjava četvrti uvjet iz presude Altmark.
It notes, in this respect, that, once the two tenderers having responded to the invitation to tender had submitted their tenders, the SMAN initiated negotiations with each one.
U tom pogledu ističe da kada su dva kandidata koji su se javili na javni natječaj podnijela ponude, sindikat SMAN je obvezan pregovarati sa svakim od njih.
Contacts were made in particular between Veolia Transport and the SMAN in order to clarify, and even amend, certain important aspects of Veolia Transport’s tender.
Veolia Transport i sindikat SMAN međusobno su kontaktirali kako bi utvrdili odnosno izmijenili određene važne aspekte ponude društva Veolia Transport.
Moreover, in the decision awarding the contract at the end of the procedure, the SMAN stated that Veolia Transport’s tender was the most advantageous with regard to the criteria laid down by the consultation rules, in particular: (i) commercial development policy; (ii) financial control; (iii) security; and (iv) quality undertaking.
Usto, u skladu s odlukom o dodjeli ugovora, sindikat SMAN je nakon provedenog postupka smatrao da je ponuda društva Veolia Transport bila najpovoljnija u pogledu sljedećih kriterija utvrđenih specifikacijom javne nabave: (i.) politika poslovnog razvoja, (ii.) financijska sposobnost, (iii.) jamstva i (iv.) obveza osiguranja kvalitete.
However, the criteria in question left the SMAN with plenty of room for manoeuvre in the choice of service provider, as these criteria were worded very generally and went beyond the quality of the service provided and the cost to the community.
Međutim, predmetni su kriteriji sindikatu SMAN ostavili širok diskrecijski prostor pri odabiru pružatelja usluga jer su sastavljeni vrlo općenito te nadilaze kvalitetu pružene usluge i trošak za tijela.
This was particularly the case with the criterion entitled ‘commercial development policy’, which cannot be likened in any way to a quality criterion for an SGEI.
To je osobito slučaj u pogledu kriterija pod nazivom „politika poslovnog razvoja” koji je nemoguće poistovjetiti s bilo kojim kriterijem kvalitete u pogledu usluga od općega gospodarskog interesa.
For all these reasons, the procedure followed by the SMAN was unlikely to ensure that ‘the tenderer capable of providing the services concerned at the least cost to the community’ was selected.
Zbog svega navedenog, postupkom koji je proveo sindikat SMAN nije bilo moguće osigurati odabir „kandidata koji te usluge može pružiti po najnižoj cijeni za zajednicui”.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that the cost forecasts produced by VTAN, based on which the flat-rate contribution was established, corresponded to the costs that a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately equipped, would have incurred in operating the airport.
Nadalje, ništa ne ukazuje da su predviđanja troškova koje je utvrdilo društvo VTAN, i na temelju kojih je utvrđen paušalni doprinos, odgovarala troškovima koje bi za upravljanje zračnom lukom snosio tipičan poduzetnik koji ima dobru upravu i odgovarajuća potrebna sredstva.
In this respect, it seems that VTAN mainly used the CCI-Airport’s operating figures to establish its forecasts.
U tom je pogledu očito da se društvo VTAN pri utvrđivanju svojih predviđanja prije svega oslonilo na podatke o upravljanju odjela CCI-zračna luka.
However, there is nothing to confirm that the CCI-Airport acted as a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately equipped.
Međutim, ne postoji element koji bi mogao potvrditi da se odjel CCI-zračna luka ponio kao prosječan poduzetnik koji ima dobru upravu i odgovarajuća potrebna sredstva.
As a result, the financial support measures granted to VTAN do not satisfy the fourth Altmark condition.
Stoga mjere financijske potpore dodijeljene društvu VTAN ne ispunjavaju četvrti uvjet iz presude Altmark.
As established above, none of the measures in question satisfies the cumulative conditions of the Altmark judgment.
Kao što je prethodno dokazano, nijedna od predmetnih mjera ne ispunjava kumulativne uvjete iz presude Altmark.
It therefore remains to determine whether the various measures in question were likely to enable the CCI-Airport or VTAN to avoid having to bear costs that would normally have had to be met out of their own financial resources or whether these corresponded to normal market conditions.
Stoga preostaje provjeriti jesu li odjel CCI-zračna luka ili društvo VTAN različitim predmetnim mjerama mogli izbjeći plaćanje troškova koji bi uobičajeno teretili njihova financijska sredstva ili odgovaraju li uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima.
Analysis of the existence of an economic advantage — Measures likely to enable the CCI-Airport and VTAN to avoid costs that they would normally have had to bear
Analiza postojanja gospodarske prednosti – mjere kojima se izbjegavaju troškovi koje bi uobičajeno morali snositi odjel CCI-zračna luka i društvo VTAN
The ‘exceptional subsidies’ totalling EUR 1,35 million received in 2005 from the CAAC, the CANM and the CGG were non-repayable subsidies granted without any prospect of a return on their investment for the authorities concerned.
„Jednokratne subvencije” ukupnog iznosa od 1,35 milijuna EUR koje su 2005. dodijelili CAAC, CANM i CGG jesu nepovratna sredstva dodijeljena bez ikakvih izgleda da će predmetna tijela ostvariti povrat ulaganja.
With regard to the repayable advances, it should firstly be noted that these were equivalent to interest-free loans granted by the CCI’s general arm to the CCI-Airport.
U pogledu povratnih predujmova, najprije valja napomenuti da su oni istovjetni beskamatnim zajmovima koje je opći odjel komore CCI dodijelio odjelu CCI-zračna luka.
According to France, ‘The fact that the advances were made available without applying an interest rate is not moreover sufficient for the Commission to conclude that they constituted State aid. In accordance with General Court case-law, it must be accepted that lenders, due to their prior capacity as shareholders, can agree to grant interest-free loans or guarantees not remunerated by premiums. Likewise, it should be accepted that it was normal for the CCI, as the airport concession-holder, to make sufficient resources available to its airport arm so that the latter could ensure the continued operation of Nîmes airport’ (footnotes omitted).
Prema mišljenju Francuske, „Činjenica da su predujmovi beskamatno stavljeni na raspolaganje nije svejedno dovoljna da Komisija zaključi da je riječ o državnoj potpori. Naime, u skladu sa sudskim praksom Općeg suda Europske unije, valja priznati da zajmodavci, zbog svojeg prethodnog svojstva dioničara, pristaju dodijeliti beskamatne zajmove ili jamstva bez premija. Jednako tako valja priznati da je za komoru CCI, u svojstvu koncesionara Zračne luke, bilo normalno da stavi dostatna sredstva na raspolaganje svojem odjelu zračne luke kako bi mu omogućila da osigura nastavak upravljanja Zračnom lukom Nîmes.” (bilješke ispuštene).
Such an argument might be relevant only if, by granting these advances to allow the continued operation of Nîmes airport, the CCI expected the airport to become profitable in the more or less long term, allowing the CCI not only to see these advances repaid, but also to receive a ‘return on its investment’ remunerating the capital committed, through any profits made by the airport.
Takav argument može biti relevantan samo ako je dodjelom predujmova u svrhu nastavka funkcioniranja Zračne luke Nîmes komora CCI mogla očekivati da će Zračna luka tako postati manje ili više dugoročno profitabilna što bi komori CCI omogućilo ne samo da vrati svoje predujmove, nego da, povrh toga, ostvari „povrat ulaganja” kojim bi nadoknadila uloženi kapital putem eventualnih dobiti koje ostvari Zračna luka.
The Commission therefore questioned France on the profits that the CCI might have expected from granting these repayable advances.
Komisija je stoga pitala Francusku o dobitima koje je komora CCI mogla očekivati od dodjele tih povratnih predujmova.
However, in its reply, France did not mention any hypothetical profit expected from granting these subsidies.
Međutim Francuska u svojem odgovoru nije navela nikakav hipotetski dobitak koji se očekivao od dodjele tih subvencija.
It simply referred to the concession’s schedule of conditions, annexed to the 1965 Order, according to which, at the end of the concession, the state undertook to repay to the CCI the balance of the advances granted to its airport arm.
Samo se pozvala na specifikaciju koncesije, priloženu Odluci iz 1965., na temelju koje se država obvezala da će po isteku koncesije vratiti komori CCI preostali iznos predujmova odobrenih njezinu odjelu zračne luke.
In its reply, France did not mention any prospect of a ‘return’ on the repayable advances, aside from the assurance of this repayment by the state at the end of the concession.
Francuska u svojem odgovoru ne spominje izgled za „povrat” u pogledu povratnih predujmova, osim jamstva države za povrat nakon isteka koncesije.
Quite clearly, at the time when it granted the various repayable advances, the CCI could not have expected the airport’s operation to become profitable, allowing the CCI-Airport to repay the advances granted while leaving a profit margin that could remunerate the capital committed by the CCI’s general arm.
U trenutku kada je dodijelila različite povratne predujmove komora CCI očito nije mogla očekivati da će upravljanje zračnom lukom postati profitabilno i omogućiti odjelu CCI-zračna luka da vrati odobrene predujmove uz dovoljnu profitnu maržu za povrat kapitala koji je uložio opći odjel komore CCI.
In fact, the repayable advances were granted from 2002.
Naime, povratni predujmovi dodjeljivani su od 2002.
At that stage, Air France had already withdrawn from Nîmes airport and the town was already being served by the TGV.
Air France je u to doba već napustio Zračnu luku Nîmes te je grad već opsluživao vlak velikih brzina.
Furthermore, as shown by Table 2, the airport’s losses since 1999 steadily became worse from that date, increasing from EUR 269000 to EUR 796000. Its losses continued to worsen after that date, reaching EUR 2,4 million in 2003 (the year when Air Littoral terminated its services to Paris), before falling to EUR 643000 in 2005.
Nadalje, kao što je navedeno u tablici 2., rezultat Zračne luke koji je bio negativan od 1999. postupno je opadao te se s -269000 EUR pogoršao na -796000 EUR. Zatim se nastavio pogoršavati te su gubitci 2003. dosegli 2,4 milijuna EUR (godina kada je Air Littoral prestao poslovati prema Parizu) prije nego što su se 2005. smanjili na 643000 EUR. Naposljetku, kao što je dokazano u analizi ugovora između odjela CCI-zračna luka i društava Ryanair/AMS, odjel CCI-zračna luka već je 2002. počeo sklapati s društvom Ryanair ugovore koji su mogli narušiti profitabilnost Zračne luke, što je činio do uključivo 2005.
Lastly, as shown by the analysis of the agreements between the CCI-Airport and Ryanair/AMS, in 2002 the CCI-Airport had already started to sign agreements with Ryanair that would erode the airport’s profitability, which it did until 2005 inclusive. Finally, in the absence of the exceptional subsidies, the CCI-Airport’s results would have been even worse, thus ruling out any prospect of a return on the capital invested.
Konačno, rezultati odjela CCI-zračna luka bez jednokratnih subvencija bili bi još lošiji te ne bi postojao nikakav izgled za povrat uloženog kapitala.
In the light of all these factors, the CCI could not have considered that there was any likelihood of it receiving any return, in the more or less short term, on the capital that it had committed through the advances granted to the CCI-Airport.
S obzirom na sve te faktore, komora CCI nije mogla smatrati vjerojatnim da se kapital koji je uložila putem predujmova odobrenih odjelu CCI-zračna luka može na bilo koji način vratiti u manje ili više kratkom roku.
The CCI could even have legitimately harboured serious doubts that the CCI-Airport would one day be able to repay the CCI.
Komora CCI legitimno je mogla ozbiljno sumnjati u mogućnost da bi odjel CCI-zračna luka jednoga dana bio u stanju komori CCI vratiti kapital.
Very significant repayable advances therefore had to be granted every year from 2002 to 2006, totalling around EUR 7 million, which was in addition to EUR 2,7 million of repayable advances granted up to the end of 2001.
Osim toga, povratni predujmovi vrlo visokih iznosa trebali su se dodjeljivati svake godine od 2002. do 2006., u ukupnom iznosu od oko 7 milijuna EUR, koji je pribrojen pozitivnom preostalom iznosu povratnih predujmova od 2,7 milijuna EUR potkraj 2001.
In this respect, France has stated that no precise deadline was set for repayment of the advances by the CCI-Airport and that these advances were determined each year in order to balance the CCI-Airport’s budget.
U tom pogledu Francuska je pojasnila da nije bio predviđen nikakav precizan rok kada bi odjel CCI-zračna luka trebao vratiti predujmove te da su ti predujmovi bili utvrđeni svake godine kako bi se uravnotežio proračun odjela CCI-zračna luka.
Furthermore, although it was stipulated that the state would repay the balance of the repayable advances at the end of the concession, it was not planned for it to pay any interest rate correctly remunerating the credit granted by the CCI to its airport arm.
Nadalje, iako je bilo predviđeno da država nakon isteka koncesije vrati preostali iznos povratnih predujmova, nije bilo predviđeno da plati bilo kakvu kamatu kao urednu naknadu za kredit koji je komora CCI dodijelila svojem odjelu zračne luke.
Given all the above, it seems that the CCI did not act towards its airport arm as an MEO motivated by the prospect of profits would have done.
Uzevši u obzir sve prethodno navedeno, proizlazi da se komora CCI nije prema svojem odjelu zračne luke ponijela kao subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji se vodi izgledima za profitabilnost.
In conclusion, the exceptional subsidies and repayable advances each conferred an economic advantage on the CCI-Airport.
Zaključno, svim jednokratnim subvencijama i povratnim predujmovima dodijeljena je gospodarska prednost odjelu CCI-zračna luka.
In addition, as these advantages each benefited a single undertaking, they were selective.
Osim toga, te su prednosti selektivne jer je svaka od njih dodijeljena samo jednom poduzetniku.
Under the CDSP, the SMAN undertook to pay a flat-rate contribution to VTAN throughout the term of the public service delegation, amounting to EUR [1,2-1,5] million in the ‘reference scenario’ and EUR [1,0-1,3] million in the ‘downturn scenario’.
Sindikat SMAN se ugovorom CDSP obvezao da će plaćati paušalnu naknadu društvu VTAN tijekom cijelog trajanja prijenosa ovlasti za obavljanje javnih usluga u iznosu od [1,2 – 1,5] milijuna EUR u slučaju „referentnog scenarija” i [1,0 – 1,3] milijuna EUR u slučaju „rezervnog scenarija”.
VTAN undertook to pay an annual fee of one euro for the occupation of the land, structures and infrastructure.
Društvo VTAN se obvezalo plaćati godišnju državnu naknadu utvrđenu na iznos od 1 EUR za posjed zemljišta, objekata i instalacija.
As this agreement represented a significant net cost for the SMAN, which could not have expected any tangible financial return on the amounts committed under this agreement, it did not correspond to normal market conditions and conferred an economic advantage on VTAN.
Budući da taj ugovor predstavlja znatan neto trošak sindikatu SMAN, koji nije mogao očekivati nikakvu osjetnu financijsku profitabilnost od iznosa uloženih na temelju tog ugovora, on ne odgovara uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima i daje gospodarsku prednost društvu VTAN.
Amendment No 1 to the CDSP increased the flat-rate contribution by EUR [20000-50000], without any prospect of a return for the SMAN. This was intended to compensate for the loss of revenue that VTAN could have expected on becoming the airport operator, but which it was forced to relinquish subsequently.
Izmjenom br. 1 ugovora CDSP paušalni doprinos povećan je za [20000 – 50000] EUR, pri čemu sindikat SMAN nije imao ikakvih izgleda za profitabilnost, i to u svrhu naknade gubitka prihoda na koji je društvo VTAN moglo računati u trenutku kada je postalo upravitelj zračne luke, ali od kojeg je kasnije moralo odustati.
Like the CDSP itself, Amendment No 1 represented a net cost for the SMAN without any prospect of a return, and did not correspond to normal market conditions.
Izmjena br. 1, kao i sam ugovor CDSP, predstavlja neto trošak sindikatu SMAN bez izgleda za povrat te ne odgovara uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima.
It therefore conferred an economic advantage on VTAN.
Stoga daje gospodarsku prednost društvu VTAN.
The same reasoning applies to Amendment No 3, which again increased the amount of the flat-rate contribution without any prospect of a return for the SMAN, and therefore conferred an economic advantage on VTAN.
Isto se obrazloženje primjenjuje na izmjenu br. 3 kojom je ponovno povećan iznos paušalnog doprinosa bez izgleda za profitabilnost sindikata SMAN te je njome dana gospodarska prednost društvu VTAN.
However, the situation is different for Amendment No 2.
Naprotiv, isto ne vrijedi i za izmjenu br. 2.
This stipulated that VTAN would renew the terminal’s air-conditioning system and that the SMAN would compensate VTAN for the undepreciated value of the equipment at the end of the delegation.
Njome je predviđeno da društvoVTAN obnovi rashladnu jedinicu terminala i da mu sindikat SMAN, nakon isteka prijenosa ovlasti, plati naknadu u visini neamortizirane vrijednosti opreme.