natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
France maintains that the subsidies granted have had only a limited effect on intra-Community trade.
Francuska tvrdi da dodijeljene subvencije ograničeno utječu na trgovinu unutar Zajednice.
As regards Avignon Airport, which is less than 60 minutes away from Marseille Provence Airport, France observes that the low-cost traffic at this airport has remained stable since 2007, that further improvements have been made to the airport since 2007, with new routes having been opened, and that none of the destinations served are accessible from Marseille Provence Airport.
U pogledu Zračne luke Avignon, koja je udaljena manje od 60 minuta od Zračne luke Marseille Provence, Francuska napominje da je niskotarifni promet u toj Zračnoj luci ostao stabilan od 2007., da je Zračna luka preuređena nakon 2007. jer su se otvarale nove linije te da nijednom od opsluživanih odredišta nije moguće pristupiti iz Zračne luke Marseille Provence.
If the area is expanded to include Nîmes and Toulon Airports, France notes that these fall under the category of small regional airports and do not therefore have the same vocation as Marseille Provence Airport, where the traffic exceeds 5 million passengers.
U pogledu proširenog područja Zračnih luka Nîmes i Toulon, Francuska napominje da one pripadaju kategoriji malih regionalnih zračnih luka i da stoga nemaju istu namjenu kao Zračna luka Marseille Provence čiji promet prelazi 5 milijuna putnika.
The fact that the destinations served are not all (except for London and Brussels) accessible from Marseille Provence Airport proves that there is no competition between these airports.
Činjenica da nije svim opsluživanim odredištima (osim Londona i Bruxellesa) moguće pristupiti iz Zračne luke Marseille Provence dokazuje da ta čvorišta nisu međusobno konkurenta.
France maintains that the Departmental Council subsidy was necessary to achieve the break-even point usually demanded by operators.
Francuska tvrdi da je subvencija Općeg vijeća bila potrebna za ostvarivanje praga profitabilnosti koji uobičajeno traže prijevoznici.
As the May 2006 business plan indicated an internal rate of return of […]* % if the Departmental Council subsidy were deducted, France maintains that the project's profitability would have been reduced to […]* % in the absence of this subsidy.
Budući da je u poslovnom planu iz svibnja 2006. utvrđen USP od […]* % tako što je oduzeta subvencija Općeg vijeća, Francuska tvrdi da je profitabilnost projekta u nedostatku subvencije pala na […]* %.
France also maintains that the subsidy was proportional as it enabled a satisfactory internal rate of return to be achieved, in the absence of a less onerous option that would have allowed the same results to be achieved.
Francuska tvrdi i da je proporcionalnost primljene subvencije opravdana činjenicom da je zbog nje moguće ostvariti zadovoljavajući USP, s obzirom na to da nije bilo povoljnije mogućnosti kojom bi se mogli ostvariti jednaki rezultati.
It points out that the work on the terminal was subject to public procurement, which may confirm that the costs were minimised.
Napominje da su za radove povezane s terminalom bili objavljeni javni natječaji, što potvrđuje da su troškovi u najvećoj mjeri ograničeni.
Lastly, France notes that the subsidy granted covered only 50 % of the total amount of the Terminal mp2 project, i.e. 80 % of the work in respect of aircraft and 30 % of the work in respect of the terminal.
Naposljetku, Francuska podsjeća da dodijeljena subvencija pokriva samo 50 % ukupnog iznosa projekta terminala mp2, odnosno 80 % radova povezanih sa zrakoplovima i 30 % radova povezanih s terminalom.
Compatibility of the ERDF subsidies of 22 August 2002 for the development of air cargo
Spojivost subvencija EFRR-a od 22. kolovoza 2002. razvoju teretnog zračnog prijevoza
As a preliminary point, France notes that part of the subsidy was for investments in non-economic activities and that only the remainder of the aid granted therefore needs to be recognised as compatible with the TFEU rules [20].
Francuska najprije napominje da se dio subvencije odnosio na ulaganja povezana s negospodarskim djelatnostima, a da bi se samo preostali dio dodijeljene potpore trebao smatrati spojivim s pravilima iz UFEU-a [20].
France points out that the application for financing for Marseille Provence Airport was made to the ERDF under the programming for Objective 2 of the Structural Funds for the 2000-2006 period, for which the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region was eligible, and which was approved by the European Commission on 22 March 2001.
Francuska podsjeća na to da je zahtjev za financiranje Zračne luke Marseille-Provence podnesen EFRR-u bio razmotren u okviru programa povezanog s Ciljem br. 2 strukturnih fondova za razdoblje od 2000. do 2006., prema kojem je regija Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur bila prihvatljiva, te da ga je Europska komisija odobrila 22. ožujka 2001.
According to France, the aid granted met a clearly defined objective of general interest: optimisation of the existing infrastructure in order to develop the cargo activity, in response to the fall in tonnage transported and in connection with the pool of jobs provided by the airport [21] in an area affected by a particularly high unemployment rate.
Prema mišljenju Francuske, dodijeljena potpora odgovara jasno utvrđenom cilju od općeg interesa: optimiranje postojećih infrastruktura za razvoj djelatnosti prijevoza tereta, kao odgovor na smanjenje prevezene tonaže i s obzirom na područje zapošljavanja na koje utječe Zračna luka [21] na prostoru s izrazito visokom stopom nezaposlenosti.
France maintains that the infrastructure concerned was necessary and proportional to the objective.
Francuska tvrdi da je predmetna infrastruktura potrebna i proporcionalna tom cilju.
It explains that this infrastructure involved the construction of a new ring road and roundabout to manage road traffic flows with a view to increased traffic, redevelopment of the cargo terminals in premises left vacant, creation of aircraft parking areas close to the cargo terminals to reduce handling time, and expansion of the cargo area to increase its attractiveness.
Napominje da se ta infrastruktura sastoji od izgradnje obilaznice i kružnog toka kako bi se osigurala protočnost prometnice s obzirom na buduće povećanje prometa, od preuređenja teretnih terminala u neiskorištenim prostorijama, uvođenjem stajanki zrakoplova u blizini teretnih terminala kako bi se skratilo vrijeme prihvata i od povećanja područja za rukovanje teretom radi veće atraktivnosti.
France maintains that the traffic results [22] prove that the infrastructure had satisfactory long-term prospects for use, and points out that the infrastructure is available to all operators.
Francuska tvrdi da prometni rezultati [22] dokazuju da su dugoročni izgledi za upotrebu infrastrukture bili zadovoljavajući te da upućuju na to da je infrastruktura stavljena na raspolaganje svim prijevoznicima.
Lastly, France maintains that a subsidy justified by the need to develop an area facing structural difficulties, and which financed only 28 % of the total project cost, could not have affected intra-Community trade.
Naposljetku, Francuska tvrdi da subvencija opravdana potrebom za razvojem područja sa strukturnim teškoćama te koja je bila ograničena na financiranje 28 % ukupnog troška projekta ne može utjecati na trgovinu unutar Zajednice.
It believes that the project financing cannot be called into question as the ERDF eligibility criteria were met.
Napominje da se financiranje ne bi trebalo dovoditi u pitanje jer su ispunjeni i kriteriji prihvatljivosti EFRR-a.
France underlines that the financing granted helped to improve road access to the airport infrastructure and remedy the issues preventing the free movement of goods.
Francuska ističe da su dodijeljena financiranja omogućila pojednostavnjivanje cestovnog pristupa infrastrukturi zračne luke te uklanjanje nedostataka koji su sprječavali slobodno kretanje robe.
Compatibility of the subsidy of 26 June 2003 for the extension and restructuring of the airport
Spojivost subvencije od 26. lipnja 2003. za proširenje i restrukturiranje Zračne luke
As a preliminary point, France notes that part of the subsidy was for investments in non-economic activities and that only the remainder of the aid granted, i.e. EUR 888457,18, therefore needs to be recognised as compatible with the TFEU rules.
Francuska najprije napominje da se dio subvencije odnosio na ulaganja povezana s negospodarskim djelatnostima, a da bi se samo preostali dio dodijeljene potpore, odnosno 888457,18 EUR, trebao smatrati spojivim s pravilima iz UFEU-a.
France maintains that this subsidy met a clearly defined objective of general interest involving the economic development of the Bouches-du-Rhône department and Provence.
Francuska navodi da ta subvencija odgovara jasno utvrđenom cilju od općeg interesa koji se odnosi na gospodarski razvoj departmana Bouches-du-Rhône i Provence.
France believes that the investments concerned were necessary and proportional to that objective as they aimed to increase the number of hourly aircraft movements by renovating runway 1, constructing ramps and creating quick exits.
Tvrdi da su predmetna ulaganja bila potrebna i proporcionalna tom cilju jer se njima trebao povećati broj letova po satu obnavljanjem uzletno-sletne staze 1, izgradnjom odvojaka i brzih izlaza.
France maintains that the investments were essential in order to handle additional traffic.
Francuska tvrdi da su ulaganja bila neophodna za prihvat dodatnog prometa.
As a result, the work carried out increased the runway capacity to 140000 commercial aircraft movements per year.
Tako se provedenim radovima povećao kapacitet uzletno-sletnih staza na 140000 komercijalnih letova godišnje.
France confirms that the infrastructure is accessible to all users and maintains that the only commercial airport less than 60 minutes away by road is Avignon Airport. As this is a Category D airport, with which Marseille Provence Airport is not in competition, the aid in question has not affected intra-Community trade.
Francuska potvrđuje da svi korisnici imaju jednak pristup infrastrukturi te navodi da je Zračna luka Avignon koja pripada kategoriji D jedina komercijalna zračna luka udaljena manje od 60 minuta putovanja cestom, a s kojom Zračna luka Marseille Provence nije u konkurenciji, te stoga potpora koja se analizira ne utječe na trgovinu unutar Zajednice.
Compatibility of the subsidy of 26 July 2004 for the development of the airport
Spojivost subvencije od 26. srpnja 2004. za razvoj Zračne luke
As a preliminary point, France notes that part of the subsidy was for investments in non-economic activities and that only the remainder of the aid granted, i.e. EUR 816535, therefore needs to be recognised as compatible with the TFEU rules.
Francuska najprije napominje da se dio subvencije odnosio na ulaganja povezana s negospodarskim djelatnostima, a da se samo preostali dio dodijeljene potpore, odnosno 816535 EUR, trebao smatrati spojivim s pravilima iz UFEU-a.
France maintains that this subsidy met a clearly defined objective of general interest involving the development of the Marseille metropolis and region, by consolidating national traffic and developing international traffic at Marseille Provence Airport, as well as its rail connection.
Francuska navodi da ta subvencija odgovara na jasno utvrđeni cilj od općeg interesa koji se odnosi na prostorni razvoj Marseillea i njegove regije, oslanjajući se na jačanje nacionalnog prometa i razvoj međunarodnog prometa u Zračnoj luci Marseille Provence te povezanost željeznicom.
France asserts that meeting this objective necessitated the work carried out, namely an increase in the capacity of Hall 1 and its upgrading in line with international standards, optimisation of runway 1 and reconstruction of runway 2, and construction of a railway station accessible to the TGV.
Francuska tvrdi da su za ostvarivanje tog cilja bili potrebni provedeni radovi, odnosno povećanje kapaciteta hale 1 i njezino usklađivanje s međunarodnim normama, optimiranje uzletno-sletne staze 1 i obnova uzletno-sletne staze 2 te izgradnja željezničkog kolodvora za TGV.
France maintains that the increase in passenger traffic proves that these facilities have satisfactory long-term prospects for use.
Francuska tvrdi da razvoj ostvarenog putničkog prometa dokazuje da je ta oprema imala zadovoljavajuće dugoročne izglede za upotrebu.
It adds that the planned construction of the railway connection could only increase use of the airport.
Dodaje da je planirana izgradnja željezničke linije mogla samo pospješiti posjećenost Zračne luke.
According to France, the infrastructure is accessible to all users without discrimination.
Prema mišljenju Francuske, svi korisnici imaju nediskriminirajući pristup infrastrukturi.
It underlines that the allocation of the halls to national, Schengen and international flights is necessary for the smooth management of passenger flows in line with the rules on border control, and that the location of flights at one or other of the terminals does not alter the fact that all airlines are free to access both terminals according to the flights that they operate.
Ističe da je podjela hala prema nacionalnim letovima, letovima unutar schengenskog prostora i međunarodnim letovima bila potrebna za dobro upravljanje protokom putnika u skladu s pravilima o kontroli granica te da raspoređivanje letova između jednog ili drugog terminala ne mijenja činjenicu da svi prijevoznici mogu slobodno pristupiti obama terminalima ovisno o letovima koje opslužuju.
France notes its belief that the work carried out has not affected intra-Community trade, given the absence of any airport in the same category located within the same area of activity, and it also stresses that the investments covered by the subsidy of 26 July 2004 were not directly intended to increase the airport's capacity.
Francuska podsjeća da smatra da provedeni radovi ne utječu na trgovinu unutar Zajednice s obzirom na to da na istom području djelovanja ne postoji zračna luka iste kategorije te nadalje ističe da ulaganja obuhvaćena subvencijom od 26. srpnja 2004. nisu bila izravno namijenjena povećanju kapaciteta Zračne luke.
France maintains that the conditions for the granting of the subsidy in question were such that they guaranteed compliance with the principle of proportionality [23].
Francuska tvrdi da se načinima dodjele subvencije koja se analizira zajamčilo poštovanje načela proporcionalnosti [23].
It notes that the public authority's commitment was limited to EUR 1 million over three years.
Podsjeća da je obveza javne vlasti bila ograničena na 1 milijun EUR u tri godine.
MARKET ECONOMY OPERATOR TEST APPLIED TO TERMINAL MP2
TEST RAZUMNOG SUBJEKTA U TRŽIŠNOM GOSPODARSTVU PRIMIJENJEN NA TERMINAL MP2
France maintains that PwC's criticism that deducting a proportion of the investment subsidy from the depreciation of the Terminal mp2 infrastructure distorts the market economy operator test is unfounded.
Francuska tvrdi da je neosnovana kritika ureda PwC prema kojoj prorata oduzimanje subvencije za ulaganje u amortizaciju infrastrukture terminala mp2 narušava test razumnog subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
According to France, the accounting rules in force require equipment subsidies attributable to future years to be deducted from the net book values of fixed assets.
Prema mišljenju Francuske, računovodstvenim pravilima na snazi propisuje se da se subvencije za opremu koje su pripisive budućim poslovnim godinama oduzimaju od neto računovodstvenih vrijednosti nepokretne imovine.
Moreover, the treatment of subsidies has been the same for Terminals mp1 and mp2, which have both benefited from a subsidy amounting to 30 % of the cost of the work on the terminal.
Usto, postupano je jednako prema terminalima mp1 i mp2 u pogledu subvencija: oba su primila subvenciju u visini od 30 % iznosa radova na terminalu.
Lastly, if the gross flows had been taken into account in the basis for the passenger charge costs, this would have led the operator to invoice users for costs that it had not actually incurred.
Naposljetku, uzimanje u obzir bruto protoka kapitala pri utvrđivanju osnove troškova za naknadu po putniku navelo je upravitelja da korisnicima naplati troškove koje oni inače ne bi snosili.
More broadly, as France has judged that the subsidy received from the Departmental Council was compatible with French and EU law, it considers that the CCIMP acted as a market economy operator by not including, in the business plan produced, any costs that it may not have actually incurred.
Šire gledano, budući da je Francuska smatrala da je subvencija koju je primilo Opće vijeće bila spojiva s francuskim pravom i pravom Unije, smatra da se CCIMP ponio kao razuman subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu jer u dostavljeni poslovni plan nije uključila troškove koje neće trebati snositi.
To justify the value of 7,5 % used to reflect the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), France maintains that this is consistent with the average estimate of the WACC for French airports [24], although it is slightly higher due to the airport's regulated scope and due to the fact that the estimate was made in a period (2004) prior to the referenced estimates.
Kako bi opravdala primijenjenu vrijednost od 7,5 % koja bi trebala odražavati ponderirani prosječni trošak kapitala (PPTK), Francuska tvrdi da je ona u skladu s prosječnom procjenom PPTK-a francuskih zračnih luka [24], iako je malo viša zbog reguliranog područja zračne luke i jer je procjena provedena u razdoblju (2004.) koje prethodi procjenama navedenima u upućivanju.
France points out that the Mazars consultancy uses, in its study, the same WACC assumption as the operator of Marseille Provence Airport.
Francuska ističe da ured Mazars u svojoj studiji primjenjuje isti pretpostavljeni PPTK kao i upravitelj Zračne luke Marseille-Provence.
France maintains that the Commission has wrongly highlighted the absence of any increase in external costs associated with modulations for objectives of general interest (incentive for the creation of new routes), as these modulations were in fact taken into account, not in the costs, but as discounts on the landing, lighting and parking charges in all the cases studied.
Francuska navodi da je Komisija pogrešno utvrdila da nisu povećani vanjski rashodi povezani s mjerama prilagodbe zbog pitanja od općeg interesa (poticanje uvođenja novih linija) jer su te prilagodbe u svim razmatranim slučajevima uzete u obzir, ne kao rashodi, nego kao popusti za slijetanje, rasvjetu i parkiranje u podacima o prometu.
France adds that these modulations benefited users of both Terminal mp2 and Terminal mp1 and that their application between 2005 and 2010 reveals that, overall, the discounts granted were balanced between the two terminals (EUR […]* million for Terminal mp1 and EUR […]* million for Terminal mp2).
Francuska dodaje da su te prilagodbe jednako pogodovale korisnicima terminala mp2 i mp1 te da je o njihovoj provedbi od 2005. do 2010. sastavljen kumulativni izvještaj odobrenih popusta za oba terminala ([…]* milijuna EUR za terminal mp1 i […]* milijuna EUR za terminal mp2).
France has also submitted a business plan produced ex post for the years 2005-2010, which confirms that the business plans presented in September 2005 and May 2006 were based on forecast figures close to the actual figures, and that the profitability of Terminal mp2 has proved to be better than that envisaged at the time of the investment decision.
Francuska je dostavila i poslovni plan izrađen a posteriori za godine od 2005. do 2010., kojim je potvrđeno da su se poslovni planovi dostavljeni u rujnu 2005. i svibnju 2006. temeljili na predviđenim podatcima koji su slični ostvarenim podatcima te da se profitabilnost terminala mp2 pokazala većom od one predviđene u trenutku donošenja odluke o ulaganju.
OPERATING CONTRIBUTION GRANTED TO THE CCIMP
OPERATIVNI DOPRINOS U KORIST DRUŠTVA CCIMP
With regard to the contributions totalling EUR […]* million paid by public authorities to the CCIMP, France maintains that they do not constitute operating subsidies, but rather compensation for services rendered by the general arm of the CCI to Marseille Provence Airport.
U pogledu doprinosâ u iznosu od […]* milijuna EUR koje su javna tijela platila CCIMP-u, Francuska tvrdi da oni ne predstavljaju operativne subvencije, nego naknadu za usluge koje je opći odjel CCIMP-a pružio Zračnoj luci Marseille-Provence.
France explains that, given the accounting separation between the airport arm of the CCI and its other arms, the sums covered by this Decision correspond to the rebilling of services rendered by the general arm to the airport, and therefore constitute contributions corresponding to services billed for the 2001-2010 period.
Francuska pojašnjuje da, s obzirom na to da se računi odjela zračne luke CCI-ja i njegovih drugih odjela vode odvojeno, iznosi koji su predmet ove Odluke odgovaraju prefakturiranjima usluga koje je opći odjel pružio Zračnoj luci te stoga predstavljaju doprinose za usluge obračunane za razdoblje od 2001. do 2010.
France highlights that a certificate issued by the CCIMP's auditor confirms the absence of financial flows from the central services of the CCIMP to Marseille Provence Airport.
Francuska ističe da je u potvrdi revizora CCIMP-a potvrđen nedostatak financijskog protoka od središnjih odjela CCIMP-a prema Zračnoj luci Marseille Provence.
France has also explained how the airport tax system works in order to show that there is no State aid involved in this mechanism.
Francuska je pojasnila i funkcioniranje sustava pristojbe zračne luke kako bi isključila eventualno postojanje državne potpore povezane s tim mehanizmom.
France states that the airport tax is provided for in Article 1609 quatervicies of the General Tax Code (code général des impôts — CGI), which stipulates that it is collected for the benefit of public or private persons operating aerodromes, that it is payable by any public air transport undertaking and that it is exclusively used to reimburse costs incurred by airport operators in carrying out sovereign tasks such as fire-rescue-safety services, control of bird hazards and security.
Francuska podsjeća da je pristojba zračne luke predviđena u članku 1609.w Općeg poreznog zakonika, kojim je propisano da se ona naplaćuje u korist javnih ili privatnih osoba koje upravljaju zračnim lukama, da je plaćaju svi zračni prijevoznici i da je isključivo namijenjena naknadi troškova upravitelja zračne luke koji su nastali pri provedbi državnih zadataka, poput vatrogasnih usluga te usluga zaštite i spašavanja, suzbijanja opasnosti od naleta ptica te sigurnosne usluge.
France further states that the airport tax amount is set annually, airport by airport, according to the services provided under the regulations in force and the expected trends in traffic figures, costs and other income received by the operator.
Francuska zatim navodi da iznos pristojbe zračne luke svake godine određuje svaka zračna luka zasebno, ovisno o uslugama koje pruža u skladu s propisima na snazi i predviđenom kretanju prometnih podataka, troškova i drugih prihoda upravitelja.
France disputes the finding that this mechanism could involve elements of State aid.
Francuska osporava tvrdnju prema kojoj je taj mehanizam mogao sadržavati elemente državne potpore.
First of all, it underlines that this general system is applicable to all French airports according to the same rules.
Francuska najprije ističe da je ta mjera općenita i da se primjenjuje na sve francuske zračne luke, na temelju istih pravila.
It further states that, given the fact that the tax rate is set according to forecast cost and traffic figures, it is difficult to ensure that the tax revenue perfectly matches the costs in any given year, but disputes that there may be overcompensation.
Zatim navodi da, s obzirom na to da se stopa pristojbe određuje ovisno o predviđenim podatcima o troškovima i prometu, prihodi teško mogu savršeno odgovarati troškovima u danoj godini, ali osporava da je moglo doći do prekomjerne naknade.