natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission and the Air Safety Committee took note of this and welcomed the confirmation from both the air carrier and from EASA that the processing of this new TCO application will receive all due attention within the framework of Regulation (EU) No 452/2014.
Komisija i Odbor za sigurnost zračnog prometa primili su to na znanje i pozdravili potvrdu tog zračnog prijevoznika i EASA-e da će obradi novog zahtjeva za izdavanje odobrenja TCO biti posvećena posebna pozornost, kako se zahtijeva Uredbom (EU) br. 452/2014.
The information available at present, based on EASA's TCO safety assessment of International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’, together with the information provided by the SAAU and International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’, shows that the implementation of the corrective actions to address the safety concerns raised by EASA is not yet sufficiently completed.
Iz trenutačno raspoloživih informacija, koje se temelje na EASA-inoj ocjeni sigurnosti zračnog prijevoznika International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA” potrebnoj za izdavanje odobrenja TCO te na informacijama koje su dostavili SAAU i International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA”, vidljivo je da provedba korektivnih mjera namijenjenih uklanjanju sigurnosnih nedostataka koje je utvrdila EASA nije zadovoljavajuća.
That information also shows that the air carrier is currently not able to itself identify non-compliances in all of its processes and activities.
Iz informacija je isto tako vidljivo da zračni prijevoznik trenutačno nije u mogućnosti samostalno utvrditi neusklađenosti u svim svojim postupcima i radnjama.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union should be amended to include the air carrier International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 474/2006.
U skladu sa zajedničkim kriterijima iz Priloga Uredbi (EZ) br. 2111/2005 Komisija smatra da bi popis zračnih prijevoznika na koje se primjenjuje zabrana letenja u Uniji trebalo izmijeniti dodavanjem zračnog prijevoznika International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA” u Prilog A Uredbi (EZ) br. 474/2006.
Member States are to continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Ukraine, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Države članice moraju, davanjem prednosti inspekcijskim pregledima na stajanci koje treba izvršiti nad zračnim prijevoznicima certificiranima u Ukrajini, i dalje provjeravati stvarno poštovanje odgovarajućih standarda sigurnosti u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 965/2012.
Air carriers from Zimbabwe
Zračni prijevoznici iz Zimbabvea
On 12 April 2016, the air carrier Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, registered in Zimbabwe, applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation.
Dana 12. travnja 2016. zračni prijevoznik Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, certificiran u Zimbabveu, podnio je zahtjev EASA-i za izdavanje odobrenja TCO.
EASA assessed that application in accordance with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 452/2014 and raised fundamental concerns regarding the failure by Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 452/2014.
EASA je ocijenila zahtjev u skladu sa zahtjevima utvrđenima u Uredbi (EU) br. 452/2014 i izrazila zabrinutost jer Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd nije pokazao da je ispunio primjenjive zahtjeve utvrđene u članku 3. Uredbe (EU) br. 452/2014.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd because it did not meet those requirements.
EASA je stoga zaključila da daljnja ocjena ne bi završila izdavanjem odobrenja TCO zračnom prijevozniku Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd jer on ne ispunjava navedene zahtjeve.
Therefore, on 7 November 2016, EASA rejected the application on safety grounds.
Stoga je EASA 7. studenoga 2016. odbila zahtjev iz sigurnosnih razloga.
On 3 March 2017, the Commission requested information from the Civil Aviation Authority of Zimbabwe (‘CAAZ’) on the measures it has taken following EASA's rejection of the TCO application of Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. That letter opened official consultations with the CAAZ, pursuant to the provisions laid down in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006.
Komisija je 3. ožujka 2017. zatražila informacije od zimbabveanskog tijela za civilno zrakoplovstvo („CAAZ”) o mjerama koje su poduzete nakon što je EASA odbila zahtjev zračnog prijevoznika Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd za izdavanje odobrenja TCO. Tim su dopisom započete službene konzultacije s CAAZ-om, u skladu s odredbama članka 3. stavka 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 473/2006.
Since the safety concerns resulting from the TCO safety assessment by EASA of Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd had not been resolved, both the CAAZ and Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd were given the opportunity to be heard on 26 April 2017 by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
S obzirom na to da sigurnosni nedostaci utvrđeni EASA-inom ocjenom sigurnosti potrebnom za izdavanje odobrenja TCO nisu uklonjeni, CAAZ i Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd dobili su mogućnost da ih 26. travnja 2017. saslušaju Komisija i Odbor za sigurnost zračnog prometa, u skladu s člankom 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 2111/2005.
During that hearing, amongst other elements the CAAZ provided information with respect to its oversight responsibilities with respect to Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. The CAAZ provided a summary of the actions it has taken in relation to the rejection on safety grounds by EASA of the application for a TCO authorisation by Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. EASA provided information on the serious safety concerns which formed the basis for its negative TCO decision.
Tijekom tog saslušanja CAAZ je među ostalim iznio informacije o svojim odgovornostima nadzora nad zračnim prijevoznikom Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. CAAZ je ukratko naveo i mjere koje je poduzeo nakon što je EASA iz sigurnosnih razloga odbila zahtjev zračnog prijevoznika Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd za izdavanje odobrenja TCO. EASA je dostavila informacije o ozbiljnim sigurnosnim nedostacima na kojima se temeljila njezina negativna odluka u pogledu izdavanja odobrenja TCO.
During that hearing, Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd provided information on the corrective actions that were initiated and that are ongoing since EASA's rejection of the TCO application by that air carrier.
Tijekom tog saslušanja Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd dao je informacije o korektivnim mjerama koje su pokrenute nakon što je EASA odbila njegov zahtjev za izdavanje odobrenja TCO i koje se još provode.
However, the information provided by Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, including the elements concerning the limited progress it has made in relation to the development of its safety and quality management systems, was insufficient to alleviate the concerns raised.
Međutim, i dalje postoje razlozi za zabrinutost jer je iz informacija koje je dostavio Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd vidljivo da je ostvaren ograničeni napredak u razvoju njegovih sustava upravljanja sigurnošću i kvalitetom.
The information available at present, including the information relating to EASA's TCO safety assessment of Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, together with the information provided by the CAAZ and by Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, clearly shows serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. It is considered that Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd is at present not able to address those safety deficiencies.
Iz trenutačno raspoloživih informacija, uključujući informacije povezane s EASA-inom ocjenom sigurnosti zračnog prijevoznika Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd potrebnom za izdavanje odobrenja TCO, i informacija koje je predstavio taj zračni prijevoznik vidljivo je da postoje ozbiljni sigurnosni nedostaci kad je riječ o zračnom prijevozniku Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. Smatra se da Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd trenutačno ne može ukloniti navedene sigurnosne nedostatke.
In fact, the ongoing safety actions of Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd are largely at the development stage only and the corrective action plan which Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd presented in response to the findings identified during the TCO safety assessment, is not robust, in particular with regard to the necessary root cause analysis.
Ustvari, njegove su trenutačne sigurnosne radnje uglavnom u razvojnoj fazi, a korektivni akcijski plan koji je Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd predstavio kao odgovor na nedostatke utvrđene ocjenom sigurnosti potrebnom za izdavanje odobrenja TCO nije dovoljno razvijen, posebno kad je riječ o potrebnoj analizi temeljnih uzroka.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union should be amended to include the air carrier Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 474/2006.
U skladu sa zajedničkim kriterijima iz Priloga Uredbi (EZ) br. 2111/2005 Komisija smatra da bi popis zračnih prijevoznika na koje se primjenjuje zabrana letenja u Uniji trebalo izmijeniti dodavanjem zračnog prijevoznika Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd u Prilog A Uredbi (EZ) br. 474/2006.
Member States are to continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Zimbabwe, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Države članice moraju, davanjem prednosti inspekcijskim pregledima na stajanci koje treba izvršiti nad zračnim prijevoznicima certificiranima u Zimbabveu, i dalje provjeravati stvarno poštovanje odgovarajućih standarda sigurnosti u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 965/2012.
Annex A is replaced by the text set out in Annex I to this Regulation;
Prilog A zamjenjuje se tekstom iz Priloga I. ovoj Uredbi;
Annex B is replaced by the text set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Prilog B zamjenjuje se tekstom iz Priloga II. ovoj Uredbi.
INTERNATIONAL JOINT-STOCK AVIATION COMPANY ‘URGA’
INTERNATIONAL JOINT-STOCK AVIATION COMPANY „URGA”
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), including
Svi zračni prijevoznici koje su certificirala tijela Demokratske Republike Kongo (DRK) nadležna za regulatorni nadzor, među ostalim
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of the Republic of Gabon, with the exception of Afrijet and SN2AG put in Annex B, including
Svi zračni prijevoznici koje su certificirala tijela Gabonske Republike nadležna za regulatorni nadzor, osim prijevoznika Afrijet i SN2AG koji su uvršteni u Prilog B, među ostalim
AIR BISHKEK (formerly EASTOK AVIA)
AIR BISHKEK (nekadašnji EASTOK AVIA)
(formerly S GROUP AVIATION)
(nekadašnji S GROUP AVIATION)
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra Leone, including
Svi zračni prijevoznici koje su certificirala tijela Sijere Leonea nadležna za regulatorni nadzor, među ostalim
All fleet with the exception of: aircraft within the Boeing B737-700 fleet, as mentioned on the AOC; aircraft within the Boeing B777-200 fleet, as mentioned on the AOC; aircraft within the Boeing B777-300 fleet, as mentioned on the AOC and aircraft within the Boeing B777-300ER fleet, as mentioned on the AOC.
Cjelokupna flota, osim: flote zrakoplova tipa Boeing B737-700, kako je navedeno u AOC-u; flote zrakoplova tipa Boeing B777-200, kako je navedeno u AOC-u; flote zrakoplova tipa Boeing B777-300, kako je navedeno u AOC-u, i flote zrakoplova tipa Boeing B777-300ER, kako je navedeno u AOC-u.
All aircraft of type Fokker F100 and of type Boeing B747
Svi zrakoplovi tipa Fokker F100 i tipa Boeing B747.
Aircraft of type Fokker F100 as mentioned on the AOC; aircraft of type Boeing B747 as mentioned on the AOC
Zrakoplovi tipa Fokker F100, kako je navedeno u AOC-u; zrakoplovi tipa Boeing B747, kako je navedeno u AOC-u.
Afrijet is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current level of operations within the Union.
Prijevozniku Afrijet za tekuće je prometovanje u Europskoj uniji dopuštena upotreba samo ovdje navedenih zrakoplova.
During that meeting, the PCAA provided information, including an overview of its certification and oversight obligations and a summary of inspection data for the period from 2011 to 2016.
Tijekom tih konzultacija PCAA je iznio podatke koji su obuhvaćali pregled njegovih obveza certificiranja i nadzora, uključujući sažete podatke o inspekcijama provedenima u razdoblju od 2011. do 2016.
In particular, the PCAA's responsibilities relating to the safety oversight of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd were discussed at that meeting.
Na tim se konzultacijama posebno raspravljalo o odgovornostima koje PCAA ima u pogledu nadzora sigurnosti zračnog prijevoznika Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd.
The SAAU and International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ were heard by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee on 25 April 2017.
Komisija i Odbor za sigurnost zračnog prometa saslušali su SAAU i zračnog prijevoznika International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA” 25. travnja 2017.
Among other elements, the SAAU reported that the oversight activities on air carriers certified in Ukraine are adjusted with SAFA records as well as with any information stemming from the TCO authorisation process.
SAAU je među ostalim izvijestio da su aktivnosti nadzora provedene nad zračnim prijevoznicima certificiranima u Ukrajini usklađene s rezultatima programa SAFA, kao i sa svim informacijama dobivenima u postupku izdavanja odobrenja TCO.
In that letter, the Commission also recalled that on 13 January 2016 EASA rejected, on safety grounds, the TCO application made by the cargo carrier AHS International (Pvt) Ltd, also certified in Pakistan. In addition, the Commission indicated in that letter that the Commission is opening official consultations with the PCAA, pursuant to the provisions laid down in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006.
U tom je dopisu Komisija isto tako podsjetila da je EASA 13. siječnja 2016. iz sigurnosnih razloga odbila zahtjev za izdavanje odobrenja TCO još jednog zračnog prijevoznika certificiranog u Pakistanu, odnosno teretnog prijevoznika AHS International (Pvt) Ltd. Uz to, Komisija je u dopisu navela da započinje službene konzultacije s PCAA-om, u skladu s odredbama članka 3. stavka 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 473/2006.
Republic of Angola AIR GICANGO 009 Unknown
Republika Angola
AO 006-01/11-MBC MBC
Nepoznata
AIR NAVE
AIR JET
AIR26
AIR NAVE
DCD
Nepoznata
ANGOLA AIR SERVICES
AIR26
DIEXIM
Nepoznata
135-054
135–054
121-003
121–003
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/831
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/831
approving the active substance Beauveria bassiana strain 147, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobravanju aktivne tvari Beauveria bassiana soj 147, u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja, i o izmjeni Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi Komisije(EU) br. 540/2011
In accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 France received on 6 November 2012 an application from Arysta Lifescience SAS for the approval of the active substance Beauveria bassiana strain 147.
U skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Francuska je 6. studenoga 2012. od subjekta Arysta Lifescience SAS primila zahtjev za odobrenje aktivne tvari Beauveria bassiana soj 147.
In accordance with Article 9(3) of that Regulation, France, as rapporteur Member State, notified the applicant, the other Member States, the Commission and the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) on 5 February 2013 of the admissibility of the application.
U skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 3. te Uredbe Francuska je, kao država članica izvjestiteljica, 5. veljače 2013. obavijestila podnositelja zahtjeva, ostale države članice, Komisiju i Europsku agenciju za sigurnost hrane (dalje u tekstu „Agencija”) o prihvatljivosti zahtjeva.
On 2 October 2014 the rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report to the Commission with a copy to the Authority, assessing whether that active substance can be expected to meet the approval criteria provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Država članica izvjestiteljica dostavila je 2. listopada 2014. nacrt izvješća o ocjeni Komisiji, pri čemu je jedan primjerak poslala Agenciji, u kojem je ocijenila može li se za tu aktivnu tvar očekivati da ispunjuje mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
The assessment of the additional information by the rapporteur Member State was submitted to the Authority in the format of an updated draft assessment report on 3 July 2015.
Država članica izvjestiteljica dostavila je Agenciji ocjenu dodatnih informacija 3. srpnja 2015. u obliku ažuriranog nacrta izvješća o ocjeni.
On 6 October 2015 the Authority communicated to the applicant, the Member States and the Commission its conclusion [2] on whether the active substance Beauveria bassiana strain 147 can be expected to meet the approval criteria provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Agencija je 6. listopada 2015. podnositelju zahtjeva, državama članicama i Komisiji dostavila svoj zaključak [2] o tome može li se za aktivnu tvar Beauveria bassiana soj 147 očekivati da ispunjuje mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009.
On 8 March 2016 the Commission presented to the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed the review report for Beauveria bassiana strain 147 and a draft Regulation providing that Beauveria bassiana strain 147 is approved.
Komisija je 8. ožujka 2016. Stalnom odboru za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje dostavila izvješće o pregledu za tvar Beauveria bassiana soj 147 i nacrt uredbe kojom se predviđa odobrenje tvari Beauveria bassiana soj 147.
It has been established with respect to one or more representative uses of at least one plant protection product containing the active substance, and in particular the uses which were examined and detailed in the review report, that the approval criteria provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are satisfied.
S obzirom na jednu reprezentativnu uporabu ili više njih najmanje jednog sredstva za zaštitu bilja koje sadržava predmetnu aktivnu tvar, a posebno s obzirom na uporabe koje su ispitane i opisane u izvješću o pregledu, utvrđeno je da su mjerila za odobravanje iz članka 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 ispunjena.
It is therefore appropriate to approve Beauveria bassiana strain 147.
Stoga je primjereno odobriti tvar Beauveria bassiana soj 147.
In accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 thereof and in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge, it is, however, necessary to include certain conditions and restrictions.
U skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 u vezi s njezinim člankom 6. te s obzirom na postojeća znanstvena i tehnička saznanja, potrebno je, međutim, utvrditi određene uvjete i ograničenja.
The active substance Beauveria bassiana strain 147, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Aktivna tvar Beauveria bassiana soj 147, kako je navedena u Prilogu I., odobrava se u skladu s uvjetima utvrđenima u tom Prilogu.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(10):4261 [35 pp.]. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4261.
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(10):4261 [35 str.]. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4261.
Beauveria bassiana strain 147
Beauveria bassiana soj 147
Accession number in the CNCM (Collection nationale de cultures de micro-organismes) — Institut Pasteur, Paris, France: I-2960.
Referentni broj u zbirci CNCM (Collection nationale de cultures de microorganismes – Nacionalna zbirka kultura mikroorganizama) – Institut Pasteur, Pariz, Francuska: I-2960.
Max. level of beauvericin: 24 μg/L
Maksimalna razina beauvericina: 24 μg/L
6 June 2017
6. lipnja 2017.
6 June 2027
6. lipnja 2027.
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on Beauveria bassiana strain 147, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, shall be taken into account.
Za provedbu jedinstvenih načela iz članka 29. stavka 6. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 uzimaju se u obzir zaključci izvješća o pregledu za tvar Beauveria bassiana soj 147, a posebno njegovi dodaci I. i II.
the protection of operators and workers, taking into account that Beauveria bassiana strain 147 is to be considered, as any micro-organism, as a potential sensitizer, and paying special attention to exposure through inhalation,
zaštitu korisnika sredstva i djelatnika, uzimajući u obzir to da se smatra da tvar Beauveria bassiana soj 147, kao i svaki drugi mikroorganizam, može uzrokovati preosjetljivost,te posebno pazeći na izloženost udisanjem;
the maximum level of the metabolite beauvericin in the formulated product.
maksimalnu razinu metabolita beauvericina u formuliranom proizvodu.
Further details on identity and specification of active substance are provided in the review report.
Dodatni podaci o identifikaciji i specifikaciji aktivne tvari navedeni su u izvješću o pregledu.
Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.’
Uvjeti uporabe prema potrebi trebaju uključivati mjere za smanjenje rizika.”
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/832
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/832
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Bürgstadter Berg (PDO)
o zaštiti naziva Bürgstadter Berg (ZOI) na temelju članka 99. Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 [1], and in particular Article 99 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 17. prosinca 2013. o uspostavljanju zajedničke organizacije tržišta poljoprivrednih proizvoda i stavljanju izvan snage uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 922/72, (EEZ) br. 234/79, (EZ) br. 1037/2001 i (EZ) br. 1234/2007 [1], a posebno njezin članak 99.
In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, Germany's application to register the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ was examined by the Commission and subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
U skladu s člankom 97. stavcima 2. i 3. Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013, Komisija je ispitala zahtjev Njemačke za upis naziva „Bürgstadter Berg” te ga potom objavila u Službenom listu Europske unije [2].
No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Komisiji nije dostavljen niti jedan prigovor u smislu članka 98. Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013.
In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of the Regulation.
U skladu s člankom 99. Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013, naziv „Bürgstadter Berg” trebalo bi zaštititi i upisati u registar iz članka 104. te Uredbe.
The name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ (PDO) is hereby protected.
Naziv „Bürgstadter Berg” (ZOI) zaštićuje se.
OJ C 384, 18.10.2016, p. 4.
SL C 384, 18.10.2016., str. 4.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/833
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/833
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Terrasses du Larzac (PDO)
o zaštiti, u skladu s člankom 99. Uredbe (EU) br. 1308/2013, naziva Terrasses du Larzac (ZOI)