natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the jurisprudence of the General Court whilst the Commission can rely on macroeconomic considerations such as raw material price distortions at industry/sector level, the MET determination must be made individually for each company, that is to say assessing whether the prices paid by the individual company for its input reflect market values [11].
U skladu sa sudskom praksom Općeg suda Komisija se može osloniti na makroekonomske okolnosti poput narušavanja cijena sirovina na razini industrije/sektora, no MET se mora odrediti pojedinačno za svako društvo, tj. mora se procijeniti odražavaju li cijene koje je društvo platilo za sirovine tržišne vrijednosti [11].
Furthermore, it was also clarified that the Commission may compare the Chinese domestic average prices of the raw material, with the average international prices in order to determine whether MET should be granted on this ground [12].
Nadalje, isto je tako objašnjeno da Komisija može usporediti prosječne domaće kineske cijene sirovina s prosječnim međunarodnim cijenama kako bi se utvrdilo treba li MET odobriti na toj osnovi [12].
As explained in recital 24 it was established that the observed price distortions in the market of unprocessed steel in the PRC were not found to be carried over in the prices of the processed metal parts paid by the applicant.
Kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 24., utvrđeno je da se uočeni poremećaj u cijenama na tržištu neprerađenog čelika u NRK-u nije prenio na cijene prerađenih metalnih dijelova koje je platio podnositelj zahtjeva.
This approach is in line with the jurisprudence as it considers the individual situation of the applicant and the argument of the Union industry in this regard was therefore rejected.
Taj pristup u skladu je sa sudskom praksom jer se njime uzima u obzir pojedinačna situacija podnositelja zahtjeva te je stoga argument industrije Unije u tom pogledu odbačen.
Finally, the Union industry claimed that attributing an individual anti-dumping margin to the applicant would consitute a high risk of circumvention as the applicant already purchased hand pallet trucks from another supplier in the PRC and re-exported them to the Union.
Naposljetku, industrija Unije tvrdi da bi dodjeljivanje pojedinačne antidampinške marže podnositelju zahtjeva predstavljalo velik rizik od izbjegavanja mjera jer je podnositelj zahtjeva već kupio ručne paletne viličare od drugog dobavljača u NRK-u i ponovno ih izvezao u Uniju.
The claim for an increased risk of circumvention was not supported by any evidence.
Tvrdnja o povećanom riziku od izbjegavanja mjera nije potkrijepljena nikakvim dokazima.
In particular, the applicant was found not to be related to the supplier in question or to any other supplier in the PRC.
Posebice, nije utvrđeno da je podnositelj zahtjeva povezan s predmetnim dobavljačem ni bilo kojim drugim dobavljačem u NRK-u.
The investigation did therefore not confirm any increased risk of circumvention in this specific case.
Stoga se istražnim postupkom nije potvrdio povećan rizik od izbjegavanja mjera u ovom specifičnom slučaju.
Finally, the risk of circumvention per se is not a criterion mentioned in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and it is therefore not relevant in the determination whether a company qualifies for MET.
Naposljetku, rizik od izbjegavanja mjera sam po sebi ne predstavlja kriterij iz članka 2. stavka 7. točke (c) Os novne uredbe i stoga nije relevantan za određivanje ispunjava li društvo uvjete za MET.
Consequently, this argument was rejected.
Kao rezultat toga ta je tvrdnja odbačena.
Following disclosure, the Union industry reiterated its arguments that steel prices based on publicly available information were not a suitable basis for comparison since the prices paid by smaller operators in the steel market would be above the international reference prices and also above the prices paid by the companies that were subject to the interim review investigation mentioned in recital 24 above.
Nakon objave industrija Unije ponovila je svoje argumente da cijene čelika temeljene na javno dostupnim informacijama nisu prikladna osnova za usporedbu jer su cijene koje plaćaju manji subjekti na tržištu čelika veće od međunarodnih referentnih cijena te isto tako iznad cijena koje plaćaju društva koja podliježu istražnom postupku privremene revizije iz uvodne izjave 24.
The Union industry also claimed that the price comparison made by the Commission referred to in recital 24 did not properly take into consideration the processing cost of the metal parts.
Industrija Unije tvrdi i da se usporedbom cijena koju je provela Komisija iz uvodne izjave 24. nisu propisno uzeli u obzir troškovi prerade metalnih dijelova.
The claims made by the Union industry were however not supported by any furher evidence.
No tvrdnje industrije Unije nisu potkrijepljene nikakvim dodatnim dokazima.
Therefore, it was considered that these comments were merely reiteration of the earlier arguments already addressed in recitals 32 to 37 above and they were rejected.
Stoga se smatra da su te primjedbe samo ponavljanje prijašnjih argumenata razmatranih u uvodnim izjavama 32. do 37. te su odbačene.
The Commission first examined whether the applicant ' s total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market was representative, namely whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the review investigation period in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prvo ispitala je li ukupni obujam domaće prodaje istovjetnog proizvoda podnositelja zahtjeva nezavisnim kupcima na domaćem tržištu reprezentativan, tj. je li ukupni obujam takve prodaje predstavljao barem 5 % ukupnog obujma izvozne prodaje predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju tijekom razdoblja istražnog postupka revizije u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. Osnovne uredbe.
The Commission found that the overall sales of the like product on the domestic market were not representative as they were below the 5 % threshold.
Komisija je utvrdila da ukupna prodaja istovjetnog proizvoda na domaćem tržištu nije bila reprezentativna jer je bila ispod praga od 5 %.
Since there were no representative domestic sales volume, the Commission constructed normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Budući da nema reprezentativnog obujma domaće prodaje, Komisija je utvrdila uobičajenu vrijednost u skladu s člankom 2. stavcima 3. i 6. Osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was constructed by adding to the average cost of production during the review investigation period the weighted average selling, general and administrative (SG & A) expenses incurred and the weighted average profit realised by the applicant on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the review investigation period.
Uobičajena vrijednost utvrđena je dodavanjem prosječnim troškovima proizvodnje tijekom razdoblja istražnog postupka revizije ponderiranog prosjeka prodajnih, općih i administrativnih troškova („POA”) i ponderirane prosječne dobiti koju je podnositelj zahtjeva ostvario domaćom prodajom istovjetnog proizvoda u uobičajenom tijeku trgovine, tijekom razdoblja istražnog postupka revizije.
The applicant exported hand pallet trucks but also their essential parts (hydraulics) which are also product concerned.
Podnositelj zahtjeva izvozio je ručne paletne viličare i njihove osnovne dijelove (hidraulika) koji su isto tako predmetni proizvod.
Exports of hydraulics were of relatively low value and volume during the review investigation period.
Vrijednost i obujam izvoza hidraulike tijekom razdoblja istražnog postupka revizije bili su relativno mali.
In addition, the hydraulics were not resold to independent customers by the related company in the Union.
Osim toga, povezano društvo u Uniji nije preprodavalo hidrauliku nezavisnim kupcima.
Instead, they were used exclusively for the production of hand pallet trucks by the related company in the Union which then sold the finished product (hand pallet trucks) on the Union market.
Umjesto toga, povezano društvo u Uniji upotrebljavalo ju je isključivo za proizvodnju ručnih paletnih viličara koje je zatim prodavalo kao gotovi proizvod (ručni paletni viličari) na tržištu Unije.
Consequently, there was no resale price for hydraulics.
Stoga nije postojala preprodajna cijena za hidrauliku.
Moreover, since the present review concerns only one company, there was no other data available on the basis of which a resale price of hydraulics could be reasonably established.
Nadalje, budući da se sadašnja revizija odnosi samo na jedno društvo, nije bilo drugih dostupnih podataka na temelju kojih bi bilo moguće razumno utvrditi preprodajnu cijenu hidraulike.
In light of that, no export price was established for the hydraulics.
U svjetlu toga nije utvrđena izvozna cijena za hidrauliku.
In agreement with the applicant, the export price established for the hand pallet trucks was considered to be representative for the essential parts, and it was thus used.
U dogovoru s podnositeljem zahtjeva utvrđena izvozna cijena ručnih paletnih viličara smatrala se reprezentativnom za osnovne dijelove te se kao takva upotrijebila.
Export sales were made via the related importer in the Union who resold the product further to independent customers in the Union.
Izvoznu prodaju vrše povezani uvoznici u Uniji koji proizvod dalje preprodaju nezavisnim kupcima u Uniji.
Therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union by deducting all costs, incurred between importation and re-sale (SG & A) and a reasonable profit margin.
Stoga je izvozna cijena utvrđena u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 9. Osnovne uredbe na temelju cijene po kojoj je uvezeni proizvod prvi put preprodan nezavisnim kupcima u Uniji smanjene za sve troškove nastale između uvoza i preprodaje (POA) kao i za razumnu profitnu maržu.
Actual SG & A of the related importer were used.
Korišten je stvarni POA povezanog uvoznika.
As regards the reasonable profit margin, in the absence of any other information available, an estimated profit margin of 5 % was used.
Što se tiče razumne profitne marže, u nedostatku drugih dostupnih informacija korištena je procijenjena profitna marža od 5 %.
Following disclosure the applicant contested the level of the SG & A related to the sales of the product concerned established during the investigation claiming that higher costs incurred when selling other products should not be attributed to the product concerned.
Nakon objave podnositelj zahtjeva osporio je razinu POA-a u pogledu prodaje predmetnog proizvoda utvrđenu tijekom istražnog postupka tvrdeći da se viši troškovi nastali pri prodaji ostalih proizvoda ne bi trebali pripisivati predmetnom proizvodu.
This claim contradicted the verified data.
Ta tvrdnja u suprotnosti je s provjerenim podacima.
The applicant was also not able to provide an alternative cost allocation, nor any evidence that would support its claim which was therefore rejected.
Podnositelj zahtjeva isto tako nije mogao dati alternativnu raspodjelu troškova ni ikakav dokaz kojim bi potkrijepio svoju tvrdnju koja je stoga odbačena.
Following disclosure, the applicant claimed that despite the relationship between the exporter and the related importer in the Union, the export prices were at arm ' s length and they should not be considered unreliable.
Nakon objave podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdio je da su unatoč odnosu između izvoznika i povezanog uvoznika u Uniji izvozne cijene bile postavljene po tržišnim uvjetima i da ih se ne bi trebalo smatrati nepouzdanima.
Therefore, the applicant considered that the export price should be established in accordance with the Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation as the price paid by the related importer.
Stoga podnositelj zahtjeva smatra da je izvozna cijena trebala biti utvrđena u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 8. Osnovne uredbe kao cijena koju je platio povezani uvoznik.
The evidence provided by the applicant did not support the claim that the price was established at arm ' s length.
Dokazima koje je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva nije potkrijepljena tvrdnja da je cijena utvrđena po tržišnim uvjetima.
Thus, the transfer price between the related companies was not at a level to allow the related importer to make a reasonable profit in the Union.
Stoga transferna cijena između povezanih društava nije bila na razini kojom bi se omogućilo da povezani uvoznik ostvari razumnu dobit u Uniji.
The Commission therefore concluded that the internal transfer price did not reflect the appropriate market value of the product concerned and this claim was rejected.
Komisija stoga zaključuje da interna transferna cijena ne odražava odgovarajuću tržišnu vrijednost predmetnog proizvoda te je ta tvrdnja odbačena.
The evidence provided by the applicant could not, however, demonstrate that the anti-dumping duties were duly reflected in resale prices and the subsequent selling prices in the Union.
Dokazima koje je podnio podnositelj zahtjeva ipak se nije moglo dokazati da su antidampinške pristojbe valjano uključene u preprodajne cijene i naknadne prodajne cijene u Uniji.
The evidence suggested a very minimal increase that even occurred after the investigation period.
Dokazi upućuju na vrlo minimalno povećanje koje se dogodilo čak nakon razdoblja istražnog postupka.
The normal value and the export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Uobičajena vrijednost i izvozna cijena uspoređene su s obzirom na cijene franko tvornica.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Radi osiguranja primjerene usporedbe, provedene su odgovarajuće prilagodbe cijena za razlike koje utječu na usporedivost cijena u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 10. Osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, adjustments were made for freight, packing expenses and import charges, inluding the custom duties (4 %) and anti-dumping duties (46,7 % and 70,8 %, imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 and amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 respectively) directly on the export price in all cases where demonstrated for differences affecting price comparability.
Na temelju toga provedene su prilagodbe za troškove prijevoza, pakiranja i uvoznih naknada, uključujući carine (4 %) i antidampinške pristojbe (46,7 % i 70,8 %, uvedene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 1008/2011 i izmijenjene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 372/2013) izravno na izvozne cijene u svim slučajevima u kojima je dokazano da razlike utječu na usporedivost cijena.
The aforementioned freight and packing expenses are, in accordance with the Article 19 of the basic Regulation, considered as confidential information.
Navedeni troškovi pakiranja i prijevoza, u skladu s člankom 19. Osnovne uredbe, smatraju se povjerljivim informacijama.
However, this information was verified by the Commission and it was found not to deviate from the usual levels.
Međutim, Komisija je te informacije provjerila i utvrdila da ne odstupaju od uobičajenih razina.
Following disclosure the applicant made a claim for a level of trade adjustment based on an alleged difference between sales on the domestic market and on the export market.
Nakon objave podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdio je da se razina prilagodbe trgovine temelji na navodnoj razlici između prodaje na domaćem tržištu i na izvoznom tržištu.
The applicant claimed that sales on the domestic market were all made to end-users while sales in the Union were made to dealers or importers.
Podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdio je da je prodaja na domaćem tržištu bila usmjerena na krajnje korisnike, a prodaja u Uniji na distributere ili uvoznike.
The applicant claimed that a special adjustment should be made under Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdio je da treba provesti posebnu prilagodbu u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 10. točkom (d) podtočkom ii. Osnovne uredbe.
The applicant provided no new or additional information to support its claim.
Podnositelj zahtjeva nije dostavio nikakve nove ili dodatne informacije kojima bi potkrijepio svoju tvrdnju.
On the basis of the information collected and verified during the investigation it could not be established that the discounts to dealers and importers were linked to a difference in sales functions.
Na temelju informacija prikupljenih i provjerenih tijekom istražnog postupka nije bilo moguće utvrditi da su popusti za distributere i uvoznike povezani s razlikom u funkcijama prodaje.
Therefore, it could not be demonstrated that the alleged difference in the level of trade had an impact on the sales prices and affected price comparability.
Stoga nije bilo moguće dokazati da je navodna razlika u razini trgovine utjecala na prodajne cijene i na usporedivost cijena.
On this basis, the claim was rejected.
Na temelju toga tvrdnja je odbačena.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with the weighted average of export price as established above.
U skladu s člankom 2. stavcima 11. i 12. Osnovne uredbe dampinška marža utvrđena je na temelju usporedbe ponderirane prosječne uobičajene vrijednosti i ponderirane prosječne izvozne cijene kako je prethodno utvrđeno.
The comparison showed existence of dumping at a level of 54,1 %, expressed as a percentage of the Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF) Union-frontier price, duty unpaid.
Usporedba je pokazala postojanje dampinga na razini od 54,1 %, izraženo kao postotak cijene troškova, osiguranja i prijevoza (CIF) na granici Unije, neocarinjeno.
AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES BEING REVIEWED
IZMJENA REVIDIRANIH MJERA
The dumping margin as established was below the country-wide injury elimination level which was established for the PRC in the original investigation referred to in recital 1 above.
Utvrđena dampinška marža bila je ispod razine uklanjanja štete na razini države utvrđene za NRK u početnom istražnom postupku iz uvodne izjave 1.
A duty based on the dumping margin should therefore be imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts produced by Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 should be amended accordingly.
Stoga bi trebalo uvesti carinu temeljenu na dampinškoj marži na uvoz ručnih paletnih viličara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova koje proizvodi društvo Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd. te Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 372/2013 na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
REGISTRATION
REGISTRACIJA
In the light of the above findings, the anti-dumping duty as established should be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which were made subject to registration pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 32/2014.
U svjetlu navedenih nalaza utvrđena antidampinška pristojba trebala bi se retroaktivno naplatiti na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda koji je bio podložan registraciji u skladu s člankom 3. Uredbe (EU) br. 32/2014.
DISCLOSURE AND DURATION OF THE MEASURES
OBJAVA I TRAJANJE MJERA
The parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose on imports hand pallet trucks and their essential parts from the applicant an amended anti-dumping duty and to levy this duty retroactively on imports made subject to registration.
Strane na koje se odnosi postupak bile su obaviještene o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih je bilo namjeravano uvesti izmijenjene antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz ručnih paletnih viličara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova od podnositelja zahtjeva i retroaktivno naplatiti te pristojbe za uvoz podložan registraciji.
Their comments were considered and taken into account were appropriate.
Njihovi komentari su razmotreni i prema potrebi uzeti u obzir.
This review does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ta revizija ne utječe na datum na koji mjere uvedene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 1008/2011 kako je izmijenjena Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 372/2013 istječu u skladu s člankom 11. stavkom 2. Osnovne uredbe.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation.
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora uspostavljenog člankom 15. stavkom 1. Osnovne uredbe,
In Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, which replaces Article 1(2) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, the following shall be inserted into the table regarding the People ' s Republic of China:
U članku 1.
Company
Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 372/2013, kojim se zamjenjuje članak 1. stavak 2. Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 1008/2011, u pogledu Narodne Republike Kine u tablicu se umeće sljedeće:
Rate of duty
Trgovačko društvo
The duty hereby imposed shall also be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been registered pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 32/2014.
Ovime uvedena pristojba naplaćuje se i retroaktivno na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda koji je bio evidentiran u skladu s člankom 3. Uredbe (EU) br. 32/2014.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports of the product concerned produced by Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd
Carinska tijela ovime se upućuju na prekid evidentiranja uvoza predmetnog proizvoda koji proizvodi Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China (OJ L 189, 21.7.2005, p. 1).
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1174/2005 od 18. srpnja 2005. o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz ručnih paletnih viličara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine (SL L 189, 21.7.2005., str. 1.).
Council Regulation (EC) No 684/2008 of 17 July 2008 clarifying the scope of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China (OJ L 192, 19.7.2008, p. 1).
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 684/2008 od 17. srpnja 2008. o razjašnjavanju opsega antidampinških mjera uvedenih Uredbom (EZ) br. 1174/2005 o uvozu ručnih paletnih viličara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine (SL L 192, 19.7.2008., str. 1.).
Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not (OJ L 151, 16.6.2009, p. 1).
Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 499/2009 od 11. lipnja 2009. o proširenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe uvedene Uredbom (EZ) br. 1174/2005 o uvozu ručnih viljuškara i njihovih osnovnih dijelova podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine na uvoz istog proizvoda otpremljenog iz Tajlanda, bez obzira na to je li prijavljen kao proizvod podrijetlom iz Tajlanda ili ne (SL L 151, 16.6.2009., str. 1.).