natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EU) No 670/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2012 amending both Decision No 1639/2006/EC establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks (OJ L 204, 31.7.2012, p. 1) and Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) br. 670/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. srpnja 2012. o izmjeni Odluke br. 1639/2006/EZ o utvrđivanju Okvirnog programa za konkurentnost i inovacije (2007. – 2013.) te Uredbe (EZ) br. 680/2007 o utvrđivanju općih pravila za dodjelu financijske potpore Zajednice u području transeuropskih prometnih i energetskih mreža (SL L 204, 31.7.2012., str. 1.) i Uredba (EZ) br. 1370/2007 od 23. listopada 2007. o uslugama javnog željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza putnika i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba Vijeća (EEZ) br. 1191/69 i (EEZ) br. 1107/70 (SL L 315, 3.12.2007., str. 1.).
In particular they mention that the PSO Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 recognises that were justified by the need to ensure the tax benefit or full capital amortisation in relation to exceptional infrastructure, rolling stock or vehicular investment, a public service contract may have a longer duration than is normally allowed.
Posebno spominju da je u Uredbi (EZ) br. 1370/2007 o obvezi obavljanja javnih usluga priznato da je to opravdano amortizacijom kapitala u vezi s izvanrednom infrastrukturom, željezničkim vozilima ili ulaganjem u vozila, odnosno ako je ugovor o javnim uslugama dodijeljen poštenim konkurentskim postupkom nadmetanja.
Joined cases C-106/09 P and C-107/09 P, Commission (C-106/09) and Kingdom of Spain (C-107/09 P) v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:732, paragraphs 90-92.
Spojeni predmeti C-106/09 P i C-107/09 P, Komisija (C-106/09) i Kraljevina Španjolska (C-107/09 P) protiv Vlade Gibraltara i Ujedinjene Kraljevine Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske, [2011.], ECLI:EU:C:2011:732, stavci 90. – 92.
Recital 115 of the opening Commission decision.
Uvodna izjava 115. odluke Komisije o pokretanju postupka.
Case C-88/03, Portugal v Commission, [2006] ECR I-7115, paragraph 81.
Predmet C-88/03 Portugal protiv Komisije [2006.] ECR I-7115, stavak 81.
Case C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline, [2001] ECR I-8384.
Predmet C-143/99, Cjevovod Adria-Wien, [2001.] ECR I-8384.
Case C-169/08, Presidente del Consiglio del Ministri v Regione Sardegna, [2009] ECR I-10821.
Predmet C-169/08, Presidente del Consiglio del Ministri protiv Regione Sardegna, [2009.] ECR I-10821.
Case T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association v European Commission, [2012].
Predmet T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association protiv Europske komisije [2012.].
See for example the General Court's analysis in this respect in Case T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association v European Commission, [2012], paragraphs 83-91.
Vidjeti, na primjer, analizu Općeg suda u tom pogledu u predmetu T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association protiv Europske komisije, [2012.], stavci 83. – 91.
Joined cases T-304/04 and T-316/04, Italy and WAM SpA v Commission, [2006] ECR II-64.
Spojeni predmeti T-304/04 i T-316/04, Italija WAM SpA protiv Komisije, [2006.] ECR II-64.
Cases COMP/M.5398 — Hutchinson/Evergreen, COMP/M.5450 — Kuhne/HGV/TIU/Hapag-Lloyd, COMP/JV.55 — Hutchinson/RCPM/ECT, COMP/JV.56 — Hutchinson/ECT, COMP/M.3863 — TUI/CP Ships, COMP/M.5398 — Hutchinson/Evergreen, COMP/M.3576 — ECT/PONL/Euromax, COMP/M.3973 — CMA CGM/Delmas, COMP/M.3829 Maersk/PONL, COMP/M.1674 — Maersk/ECT, IV/M.831 — P&O/Royal Nedlloyd.
Predmeti COMP/M.5398 – HUTCHINSON/EVERGREEN, COMP/M.5450 – KUHNE/HGV/TIU/HAPAG-LLOYD, COMP/JV.55 – HUTCHINSON/RCPM/ECT, COMP/JV.56 – HUTCHINSON/ECT, COMP/M.3863 – TUI/CP SHIPS, COMP/M.5398 – HUTCHINSON/EVERGREEN, COMP/M.3576 – ECT/PONL/EUROMAX, COMP/M.3973 –CMA CGM/DELMAS, COMP/M.3829 MAERRSK/PONL, COMP/M.1674 – MAERSK/ECT, IV/M.831 – P&O/ROYAL NEDLLOYD.
Case 409/V/2009, Decision of 23 January 2009, p. 22.
Predmet 409/V/2009, Odluka od 23. siječnja 2009., str. 22.
Port of Thessaloniki, port of Constanza in Romania, port of Koper in Slovenia and a number of ports in Italy (cf. footnote 173 of the opening decision).
Luka Solun, luka Costanza u Rumunjskoj, luka Koper u Sloveniji i niz luka u Italiji (vidjeti bilješku 173. odluke o pokretanju postupka).
Commission decision of 18 December 2009 on Case C 21/09 (ex N 105/08, N 168/08 and N 169/08) — Greece — Public financing of infrastructure and equipment at the Port of Piraeus (OJ C 402, 29.12.2012, p. 25).
Odluka Komisije od 18. prosinca 2009. o predmetu C 21/09 (ex N 105/08, N 168/08 i N 169/08) – Grčka – Javno financiranje infrastrukture i opreme u luci Pirej (SL C 402, 29.12.2012., str. 25.).
Due to: the distance of Piraeus from these areas; the lack of modern railway link and services; the additional significant cost which would be involved; and the arrangements of the major deep-sea container shipping lines which serve the central Mediterranean area through container port terminals in Malta (e.g. Maersk), Taranto (e.g. Evergreen), Venice (e.g. MSC) and Gioia Tauro (e.g. MSC)
Iz sljedećih razloga: udaljenost Pireja od tih područja; nepostojanje moderne željezničke veze i usluga, dodatni značajni trošak koji bi mogao biti uključen i sporazumi operatora kontejnerskog prijevoza koji opslužuju područje srednjeg Sredozemlja putem kontejnerskih lučkih terminala u Malti (npr. Maersk), Taranto (npr. Evergreen), Venecija (npr. MSC) i Gioia Tauro (npr. MSC).
For example Koper offers a sea depth of approximately 9 metres as opposed to 15-19 metres offered by Piraeus (which normally requires well above 12 metres for the ships it services).
Na primjer, u luci Koper dubina mora je otprilike 9 metara za razliku od 15 – 19 metara u Pireju (kojoj je obično potrebno znatno više od 12 metara za brodove koje opslužuje).
13500 TEU container ships call on Piraeus container port every week which could not be serviced by any of these ports.
U luku Pirej svaki tjedan pristaju kontejnerski brodovi 13500 TEU, koje ne bi mogla opsluživati niti jedna od navedenih luka.
The additional journey and significant cost involved in carrying transhipment traffic to any of the other ports would make these ports unattractive for this type of traffic.
Dodatni troškovi prijevoza tereta za prekrcaj u bilo koju od drugih navedenih luka umanjili bi privlačnost tih luka za takvu vrstu prometa.
The two-way distance of Piraeus from this shipping line is for a normal deep-sea vessel only approximately 16 hours' sailing time, as opposed to 44 for Thessaloniki, 120 hours for Koper and several days for Constanza (due to the need to travel through the Dardanelles and Bosphorus and the traffic congestion problems there).
Dvosmjerna udaljenost luke Pirej od te brodarske linije za obični brod za prijevoz na duge udaljenosti iznosi samo otprilike 16 sati plovidbe, dok bi do Soluna iznosila 44 sata, do Kopera 120 sati i nekoliko dana do Costanze (zbog putovanja kroz Dardaneli i Bospor i tamošnje probleme sa zagušenjem prometa).
According to paragraph 117 of the Commission decision: ‘The only EU ports which form part of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea market are the ones situated on the Black Sea (such as Constanza in Romania, Varna in Bulgaria). However, due to the special situation of the straits connecting the Black Sea with the Aegean Sea, the Black Sea ports are not the main competitors of the Port of Piraeus. Similarly, even though it cannot be fully excluded that other EU ports, such as the Adriatic ports of Italy and Slovenia, may also be in competition with the Port of Piraeus, the competition between them and the Port of Piraeus is insignificant’.
U skladu sa stavkom 117. odluke Komisije: „Jedine luke EU-a koje su dio pomorskog tržišta istočnog Sredozemlja one su koje se nalaze na Crnom moru (kao što je Constanza u Rumunjskoj, Varna u Bugarskoj). Međutim, zbog posebne situacije prolaza koji povezuju Crno i Egejsko more, luke u Crnom moru nisu glavni konkurenti luke Pirej. Slično tome, iako se ne može potpuno isključiti mogućnost da bi se druge luke u EU-u, kao što su sredozemne luke u Italiji i Sloveniji, mogle natjecati na tržištu s lukom Pirej, tržišno natjecanje između njih i luke Pirej neznatno je”.
Paragraphs 114 and 115 of Commission decision in Case C 21/09 mentioned in footnote 4.
Stavci 114. i 115. odluke Komisije u predmetu C 21/2009 spomenute u bilješci 4.
Its location amidst Greece's biggest urban area of more than 5 million people, the biggest industrial/commercial area with the best rail and road links available in the country; (ii) extensive berthing space, storage facilities, and a large anchorage; (iii) the biggest sea depth; (iv) the closest distance to the Suez/Gibraltar axis; (v) one of the most competitive bunker oil markets worldwide; (vi) extensive ship repair facilities and the broad range of services required by ship operators.
i. njegova lokacija u središtu najvećeg gradskog područja Grčke u kojem živi više od 5 milijuna ljudi i najvećeg industrijskog/trgovačkog područja s najbojim željezničkim i cestovnim vezama u zemlji, ii. prostrani vezovi, skladišni prostori i sidrišta, iii. najveća dubina mora, iv. najmanja udaljenost do osi Sueskog kanala/Gibraltarskog prolaza, v. jedno od najkonkurentnijih tržišta pogonskog ulja na svijetu, vi. prostrani objekti za popravljanje brodova i veliki raspon usluga koje su potrebne brodarima.
Commission decisions in Cases N 508/07 Ionia Odos, N 45/08 — Motorway Elefsina-Korinthos-Patras-Pirgos-Tsakona, N 566/07 Korinthos-Tripoli-Kalamata Motorway and Lefktro-Sparti Branch, N 565/07 Central Greece Motorway, N 633/07 Maliakos-Kleidi section of Patras-Athens-Thessaloniki-Evzona Motorway concession contract, N 134/07 Thessaloniki Submerged Tunnel concession contract, N 462/99 Attiki Odos, NN 143/97 Rio Antirrio Motorway Bridge, NN 27/96 Spata International Airport.
Odluke Komisije u predmetima N 508/07 Ionia Odos, N 45/08 – Autocesta Elefsina-Korinthos-Patras-Pirgos-Tsakona, N 566/07 Autocesta Korinthos-Tripoli-Kalamata i Lefktro-Sparti Branch, N 565/07 Središnja grčka autocesta, N 633/07; Ugovor o koncesiji za odjeljak Maliakos-Kleidi autoceste Patras-Athens-Solun-Evzonat, N 134/07, Ugovor o koncesiji za podmorski tunel u Solunu N 462/99 Attiki Odos, NN 143/97, Nadvožnjak autoceste Rio Antirrio, NN 27/96 Međunarodna zračna luka Spata.
Commission decision in Case NN 27/96 Spata International Airport.
Odluka Komisije u predmetu NN 27/96, međunarodna zračna luka Spata
Commission decisions in Cases N 462/99 Attiki Odos and NN 143/97 Rio Antirrio Motorway Bridge.
Odluke Komisije u predmetima N 462/99 Attiki Odos i NN 143/97 Nadvožnjak autoceste Rio Antirrio.
Joined Cases T-427/04 France v Commission and T-17/05 France Telecom v Commission, ECR [2009] II-0435, paragraphs 264-266, C-474-09 P to C-476/09 P, Territorio Historico de Vizcaya, ECLI:EU:C:2011:522, paragraph 70.
Spojeni predmeti T-427/04 Francuska protiv Komisije i T-17/05 France Telecom protiv Komisije, ECR [2009] II-0435, stavci 264. – 266., C-474-09 P do C-476/09 P, Territorio Historico de Vizcaya, ECLI:EU:C:2011:522, stavak 70.
See recital 221 of the opening decision.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 221. odluke o pokretanju postupka.
In the same line of reasoning, the Commission also approved a scheme on broadband infrastructure in rural areas (SA. 32866 (11/N) that had as legal basis Law 3389/2005 concerning PPPs that contains fiscal provisions similar to those of Law 3755/2009.
Na istoj osnovi, Komisija je odobrila i mjere za infrastrukturu širokopojasnog pristupa internetu u ruralnim područjima (SA.32866 (11/N) kojoj je pravna osnova bila Zakon 3389/2005 o PPP-ovima koji sadržava fiskalne odredbe slične Zakonu 3755/2009.
See recitals 225 and 226 of the opening decision.
Vidjeti uvodne izjave 225. i 226. odluke o pokretanju postupka.
In 2012: (a) the traffic in the Pier II has increased by 76,5 % as compared to 2011 (2,108 million TEU in 2012 as compared to 1,188 million TEU in 2011); (b) the capacity was 700000 TEU higher than what was foreseen in the concession contract; (c) the revenues increased by 43 % as compared to 2011 (from EUR 72,87 million to EUR 104,3 million).
Tijekom 2012. a) promet na pristaništu II povećao se za 76,5 % u odnosu na 2011. (2,108 milijuna TEU 2012. za razliku od 1,188 milijuna TEU 2011.), b) kapacitet je bio 700000 TEU veći nego što je predviđeno u ugovoru o koncesiji, c) prihodi su se povećali za 43 % u usporedbi s 2011. (s 72,87 milijuna EUR na 104,3 milijuna EUR).
In 2012 PCT, Trainose and Hewlett Packard signed an agreement due to which Hewlett Packard would channel its products through Greece to other neighbouring countries.
Godine 2012. društva PCT, TRAINOSE i Hewlett Packard potpisala su sporazum u skladu s kojim bi društvo Hewlett Packard usmjeravalo svoje proizvode preko Grčke do drugih susjednih zemalja.
Commission decisions in Cases C 39/09 — Latvia — Ventspills Free Port Authority (50 % aid intensity), SA.
Odluke Komisije u predmetima C 39/2009 – Latvija – Ventspills Free Port Authority (50 % intenziteta potpore), SA.
30742 Construction of Infrastructure for the Ferry Terminal in Klaipeda (65 % aid intensity), SA 34940 (2012/N) Port of Augusta (68,87 % aid intensity), N 649/01 Freight facilities grant (94 % aid intensity), C 21/09 Public financing of infrastructure and equipment at the port of Piraeus.
30742 Izgradnja infrastrukture za trajektni terminal u Klaipedi (65 % intenziteta potpore), SA 34940 (2012/N) Luka Augusta (68,87 % intenziteta potpore), N 649/2001 Bespovratna sredstva za objekte za teret (94 % intenziteta potpore), C 21/2009 Javno financiranje infrastrukture i opreme u luci Pirej.
See footnote 34.
Vidjeti bilješku 34.
Regulation (EU) No 670/2012.
Uredba (EU) br. 670/2012.
For this they refer to the fact that the China Development Bank, one of PCT's creditors, waited for the adoption of the ratification law in order to sign its loan to PCT.
Za to upućuju na činjenicu da je Kineska banka za razvoj, jedan od vjerovnika društva PCT, čekala donošenje zakona o potvrđivanju prije potpisivanja svog zajma društvu PCT.
Furthermore, they refer to an e-mail the […] sent to PCT in January 2009 expressing its main concerns about the funding of the said concession agreement.
Nadalje, oni u e-pošti upućuju na […] poslan društvu PCT u siječnju 2009. u kojem su izrazili svoju zabrinutost u vezi s financiranjem predmetnog ugovora o koncesiji.
According to this email the concession agreement did not provide protection against general or discriminatory change in law and they argue that this concerned the fiscal framework of the concession agreement.
U toj poruci e-pošte tvrde da se ugovorom o koncesiji nije osigurala zaštita od opće ili diskriminacijske promjene zakona i tvrde da se to odnosilo na fiskalni okvir ugovora o koncesiji.
The estimates provided were based on a study produced by PricewaterhouseCoopers Business Solutions SA These estimates consisted in a comparison of the assumptions of Cosco's business plan at the time of the publication of the ratification law (March 2009) and the generally applicable provisions.
Dostavljene procjene bile su utemeljene na studiji društva PricewaterhouseCoopers Business Solutions S.A. Procjene su se sastojale od usporedbe pretpostavki Costcovog poslovnog plana u trenutku objave zakona o potvrđivanju (ožujak 2009.) i opće primjenjivih odredbi.
From the result of this comparison they deducted the amount corresponding to the additional funding needs PCT would have in the absence of the fiscal measures.
Od rezultata tih usporedbi oduzeli su iznos koji odgovara dodatnim potrebama za financiranjem koje bi društvo PCT imalo da nije bilo fiskalnih mjera.
The amount deriving from these calculations was in the end calculated in discounted values (with the use of an annual discount rate of 9,0 %, i.e. the discount rate used by PPA in discounting the minimum guaranteed concession fees offered by PCT during the tender, but also an annual discount rate of 4,47 % of March 2009, i.e. reference rate provided in the Commission communication).
Iznos dobiven tim izračunima na kraju je izračunan u diskontiranim vrijednostima (primjenom godišnje diskontne stope od 9,0 %, odnosno, diskontne stope koju je društvo PPA upotrijebio za diskontiranje minimalnih zajamčenih naknada za koncesiju koje je društvo PCT ponudilo tijekom natječaja, ali i godišnje diskontne stope od 4,47 % iz ožujka 2009., odnosno, referentne stope koja je navedena u komunikaciji Komisije).
Finally these calculations do not include the measures in Articles 2.3, 2.5, 2.9, 2.10 and Article 3 of the Law.
Naposljetku, ti izračuni ne uključuju mjere iz članaka 2.3, 2.5, 2.9, 2.10 i članka 3. Zakona.
In the worst case scenario.
U scenariju najgoreg slučaja.
Commission Decision in Case SA.21918 — France — Regulated electricity tariffs in France (OJ C 398, 22.12.2012, p. 10), Commission Decision 98/353/EC of 16 September 1997 on State aid for Gemeinnützige Abfallverwertung GmbH (OJ L 159, 3.6.1998, p. 58), Commission Decision C(2007) 134 of 24 January 2007 in State aid Case NN 67/05 — Lithuania — reduction of a profit tax rate for UAB ‘Bite GSM’, Commission Decision 2003/227/EC of 2 August 2002 on various measures and the State aid invested by Spain in Terra Mítica SA, a theme park near Benidorm (Alicante) (OJ L 91, 8.4.2003, p. 23), Commission Decision of 14 April 2010 in State aid Case NN 30/09 — Ireland — Hotel capital allowances for the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Powerscourt, Co. Wicklow, Commission Decision 2003/590/EC of 5 March 2003 on the State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to grant to CDC Group plc (OJ L 199, 7.8.2003, p. 28), Commission Decision 2009/476/EC of 28 January 2009 on State aid implemented by Luxembourg in the form of the creation of a compensation fund for the organisation of the electricity market (C 43/02 (ex NN 75/01)) (OJ L 159, 20.6.2009, p. 11), Commission Decision 98/212/EC of 16 April 1997 on the aid granted by Italy to Enirisorse SpA (OJ L 80, 18.3.1998, p. 32), Commission Decision of 1 March 2007 in State aid NN4/07 — ‘Delitissue Sp. z o.o.’ under document C(2007) 769.
Odluka Komisije u predmetu SA.21918 – Francuska – Regulirane cijene električne energije u Francuskoj (SL C 398, 22.12.2012., str. 10.), Odluka Komisije 98/353/EZ od 16. rujna 1997. o državnoj potpori za društvo Gemeinnützige Abfallverwertung GmbH (SL L 159, 3.6.1998., str. 58.), Odluka Komisije C(2007) 134 od 24. siječnja 2007. u predmetu državne potpore NN 67/05 – Litva – smanjenje stope poreza na dobit za društvo UAB „Bite GSM”, Odluka Komisije 2003/227/EZ od 2. kolovoza 2002. o različitim mjerama i državnoj potpori koju je Španjolska uložila u društvo Terra Mítica SA, zabavni park u blizini Benidorma (Alicante) (SL L 91, 8.4.2003., str. 23.), Odluka Komisije od 14. travnja 2010. u predmetu državne potpore NN 30/09 – Irska – Kapitalni odbici za hotel Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Powerscourt, Co. Wicklow, Odluka Komisije 2003/590/EZ od 5. ožujka 2003. o državnoj potpori koju Ujedinjena Kraljevina planira odobriti društvu CDC Group plc (SL L 199, 7.8.2003., str. 28.), Odluka Komisije 2009/476/EZ od 28. siječnja 2009. o potpori koju je proveo Luksemburg u obliku stvaranja kompenzacijskog fonda za organizaciju tržišta električne energije (C 43/02 (ex NN 75/01)) (SL L 159, 20.6.2009., str. 11.), Odluka Komisije 98/212/EZ od 16. travnja 1997. o potpori koju je Italija odobrila društvu Enirisorse SpA (SL L 80, 18.3.1998., str. 32.), Odluka Komisije od 1. ožujka 2007. o državnoj potpori NN 4/07 – „Delitissue Sp. z o.o.” pod brojem dokumenta C(2007) 769.
According to PCT's calculations, the impact of the adoption of the fiscal provisions on the real internal rate of return (‘IRR’) taken into account in PCT's Model Business Plan of March 2009 has been estimated at […] basis points (i.e. […] %) reflecting an increase in this IRR calculated in the absence of the fiscal provisions concerned of approximately […] % (i.e. from […] % to […] %).
Prema izračunima društva PCT, procijenjeno je da učinak donošenja fiskalnih odredbi na stvarnu internu stopu povrata („IRR”) uzetu u obzir u modelu poslovnog plana društva PCT iz ožujka 2009. iznosi […] baznih bodova (tj. […] %) što odražava povećanje ovog IRR-a izračunatog bez predmetnih fiskalnih odredbi od otprilike […] % (tj. s […] % na[…] %).
Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98, Pavlov and others, [2000] ECR I-6451.
Spojeni predmeti C-180/98 to C-184/98, Pavlov i ostali, [2000] ECR I-6451.
See, inter alia, judgment of 24 October 2002, Case C-82/01P Aéroport de Paris, ECR 2002, I-9297, as well as judgment of 24 March 2011 in Joined Cases T-455/08 Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH and Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG c/Commission and Case T-443/08 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission, [2011] II-1311.
Vidjeti, inter alia, presudu od 24. listopada 2002., predmet C-82/01P Aéroport de Pariz, ECR 2002, I-9297, te presudu od 24. ožujka 2011. u spojenim predmetima T-455/08 Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH i Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG c/Komisija i predmetu T-443/08 Freistaat Sachsen i Land Sachsen-Anhalt protiv Komisije, [2011] II-1311.
Case C-39/94 SFEI and Others [1996] ECR I-3547, paragraph 60; Case C-342/96 Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraph 41.
Predmet C-39/94 SFEI i ostali [1996.] ECR I-3547, stavak 60.; predmet C-342/96 Španjolska protiv Komisije [1999] ECR I-2459, stavak 41.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 13.
Predmet 173/73 Italija protiv Komisije [1974.] ECR 709, stavak 13.
Cases C-143/99 Adria-Wien Pipeline [2001] ECR I-8365, paragraph 38; C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, paragraph 13; and Case C-200/97 Ecotrade [1998] ECR I-7907, paragraph 34.
Predmeti C-143/99 Cjevovod Adria-Wien [2001.] ECR I-8365, stavak 38.; C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, stavak 13.; i predmet C-200/97 Ecotrade [1998.] ECR I-7907, stavak 34.
Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze and others, [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 132.
Predmet C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze i ostali, [2006] ECR I-289, stavak 132.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans [2003] ECR I-7747.
Predmet C-280/00 Altmark Trans [2003] ECR I-7747.
Case C-39/94 SFEI and others [1996] ECR I-3547, paragraphs 60-61.
Predmet C-39/94 SFEI i ostali [1996.] ECR I-3547, stavci 60. – 61.
See Joined Cases C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P and C-76/09 P Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’, Hotel Cipriani Srl and Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) v Commission, [2011] I-4727, paragraphs 92 and 94 to 96, and Order of the President of the General Court in Case T-172/14 R Stahlwerk Bous v Commission, paragraphs 59 and 60.
Vidjeti spojene predmete C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P i C-76/09 P Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere”, Hotel Cipriani Srl i Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) protiv Komisije, [2011.] I-4727, stavci 92. i 94. do 96., i Nalog predsjednika Općeg suda u predmetu T-172/14 R Stahlwerk Bous protiv Komisije, stavci 59. i 60.
Cases C-143/99 Adria-Wien Pipeline [2001] ECR I-8365, paragraph 41; C-308/01 GIL Insurance and Others [2004] ECR I-4777, paragraph 68; C-172/03 Heiser [2005] ECR I-1627, paragraph 40.
Predmeti C-143/99 Cjevovod Adria-Wien [2001.] ECR I-8365, stavak 41.;C-308/01 GIL osiguranje i ostali [2004] ECR I-4777, stavak 68.; C-172/03 Heiser [2005] ECR I-1627, stavak 40.
See, Cases C-143/99 Adria-Wien, paragraph 41, Case C-308/01 GIL Insurance [2004] ECR I-4777, paragraph 68, C-172/03, Heiser [2005] ECR I-1627, paragraph 40, C-88/03, Portugal v Commission [2006] ECR I-7115, paragraph 54, T-233/04, Netherlands v Commission, paragraph 86.
Vidjeti predmeti C-143/99 Adria-Wien, stavak 41., predmet C-308/01 GIL osiguranje [2004.] ECR I-4777, stavak 68., C-172/03, Heiser [2005] ECR I-1627, stavak 40., C-88/03, Portugal protiv Komisije [2006.] ECR I-7115, stavak 54., T-233/04, Nizozemska protiv Komisije, stavak 86.
See, for instance, Case C-279/08P, Commission v Netherlands (NOx) [2011] ECR I-7671, paragraph 62.
Vidjeti, primjerice, predmet C-279/08P, Komisija protiv Nizozemske (NOx) [2011.] ECR I-7671, stavak 62.