natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The CCIPB has disputed that the agreements covered by the formal investigation procedure are imputable to the State as it denies that the State and local authorities are involved in its decisions.
Komora CCIPB osporava pripisivost državi Ugovora iz formalnog istražnog postupka poricanjem uključenosti države i javnih vlasti u njegove odluke.
In the light of the above, this argument does not appear to stand up as the CCIPB is itself a public authority whose decisions are necessarily imputable to the State within the meaning of the case-law on State aid, regardless of the role played in its decisions by other authorities.
S obzirom na prethodno izneseno, ta se tvrdnja čini bespredmetnom jer je CCIPB javno tijelo čije su odluke nužno pripisive državi u smislu sudske prakse o državnim potporama, neovisno o ulozi drugih tijela u tim odlukama.
For the same reasons, the CCIPB’s argument that supervision by the State does not imply subordination is also without merit.
Iz istih razloga, jednako tako nije relevantan ni argument komore CCIPB prema kojem nadzor koji provodi država ne podrazumijeva da su komore podređene državi.
As already highlighted in recital 273, in its comments on the opening decision, the CCIPB presented itself as a non-profit-making public body, thus confirming the Commission’s argument that the CCIPB is a public authority and that all its decisions are imputable to the State, without the involvement of other public authorities in those decisions having to be ascertained.
Kao što je već navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 273., u svojim se opaskama na odluku o pokretanju postupka komora CCIBP predstavila kao „javna vlast čiji cilj nije ostvariti dobit” čime je potvrdila tezu Komisije prema kojoj je CCIPB javno tijelo čije su sve odluke pripisive državi, bez potrebe za provjerom jesu li druga javna tijela bila uključena u tu odluku.
Ryanair’s comments on this point are substantially similar to those of the CCIPB.
Opaske društva Ryanair u tom pogledu u bitnome su slične opaskama komore CCIPB.
Ryanair has in particular indicated that the Commission should examine the imputability criterion by assessing the involvement of ‘public authorities’ in the CCIPB’s decisions with regard to Ryanair and AMS.
Ryanair je posebno smatrao da je Komisija trebala ispitati kriterij pripisivosti analizom uključenosti „javnih tijela” u odluke komore CCIPB u pogledu društava Ryanair i AMS.
Ryanair has also cited a Council of State opinion that suggests that chambers of commerce and industry are independent from the State in the strict sense.
Ryanair je, nadalje, citirao mišljenje Državnog vijeća kojim je htio dokazati neovisnost trgovačkih i industrijskih komora u odnosu na državu u strogom smislu riječi.
According to this opinion, the fact that chambers of commerce and industry answer to the State, in so far as any public body must technically answer to a legal person, does not in itself imply any subordination.
Prema tom mišljenju, činjenica da su trgovačke i industrijske komore „povezane s državom, s obzirom na to da sve javne ustanove moraju biti tehnički povezane s pravnom osobom, ne podrazumijeva da su podređene državi”.
Ryanair argues in this respect that the State (in the strict sense) is involved only in certain decisions of the CCIPB, of which it is informed only after the fact.
Ryanair ističe u tom pogledu da je država (u strogom smislu riječi) uključena samo u određene odluke komore CCIPB te je o njima obaviještena tek a posteriori.
For all the reasons given above, this argument is without merit as there is no need to ascertain whether any public authorities, other than the CCIPB, are involved in the latter’s decisions.
Iz svih prethodno iznesenih razloga, taj argument nije relevantan jer nema potrebe preispitati jesu li u odluke komore CCIPB eventualno uključena druga javnih tijela, osim komore CCIPB.
Likewise, the CCIPB’s argument that it operates Pau airport under the rules of private law is without merit, as the measures in question were adopted by a public body and are therefore necessarily imputable to the State.
Usto, argument komore CCIPB prema kojem ona upravlja Zračnom lukom Pau „u uvjetima privatnog prava” nije relevantan jer su dotične mjere usvojile javne vlasti i stoga su nužno pripisive državi.
In conclusion, the various agreements covered by this assessment are imputable to the State and involve the use of state resources.
Zaključno, različiti ugovori koji su predmet ove istrage pripisivi su državi te podrazumijevaju uporabu državnih sredstava.
Selective advantage for Ryanair, AMS and Transavia in the agreements signed with the CCIPB during the period under review
Selektivna prednost u korist društava Ryanair, AMS i Transavia iz Ugovora sklopljenih s komorom CCIPB u ispitivanom razdoblju
In order to determine whether a state measure constitutes aid, it is necessary to establish whether the recipient undertaking receives an economic advantage that it would not have obtained under normal market conditions.
Kako bi se ocijenilo predstavlja li državna mjera potporu, potrebno je utvrditi je li poduzetnik korisnik ostvario gospodarsku prednost koju ne bi ostvario u uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima.
In order to make this assessment, the MEO test should be applied to the measures in question.
Pri provedbi ove analize potrebno je na dotične mjere primijeniti načelo subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
This involves determining whether a hypothetical MEO acting in place of the CCIPB and motivated by the prospect of profits would have entered into similar agreements.
U okviru tog načela potrebno je utvrditi bi li pretpostavljeni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu, koji bi djelovao umjesto komore CCIPB i vodio se izgledima za profitabilnost, sklopio slične ugovore.
In order to correctly apply this test, a number of general questions should be answered first, particularly the following.
Najprije je potrebno, radi ispravne primjene načela, ispitati različita sljedeća općenita pitanja:
What benefits could a hypothetical MEO acting in place of the CCIPB have expected from the marketing services agreements?
Koje bi koristi pretpostavljeni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji bi djelovao umjesto komore CCIPB mogao očekivati od ugovora o marketinškim uslugama?
What, for the purposes of applying the MEO test, is the relevance of comparing the terms of the airport services agreements covered by the formal investigation procedure with the airport charges invoiced at other airports?
Koliko je relevantna usporedba uvjeta ugovora o marketinškim uslugama iz formalnog istražnog postupka s naknadama zračne luke koje obračunavaju druge zračne luke za potrebe primjene načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu?
After answering these questions, the Commission will apply the MEO test to the various measures in question.
Nakon što ispita ta različita pitanja, Komisija će primijeniti načelo subjekta u tržišnom natjecanju na dotične različite mjere.
Joint analysis of the airport services agreements and marketing services agreements
Zajednička analiza ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i ugovora o marketinškim uslugama
In the extension decision, the Commission considered that the two types of agreement covered by the formal investigation procedure, namely the airport services agreements and the marketing services agreements, should be analysed together, for each period in question, at the time when each of the agreements was signed.
U odluci o proširenju postupka, Komisija je smatrala da je dvije vrste ugovora iz formalnog istražnog postupka, odnosno ugovore o uslugama zračne luke i ugovore o marketinškim uslugama, potrebno zajedno ocijeniti u pogledu svakog promatranog razdoblja, u trenutku sklapanja svakog od dotičnih ugovora.
This approach particularly involves each set of agreements below, entered into by the CCIPB, being treated as a single measure:
Tim se pristupom posebno podrazumijeva da se prema svakoj skupini ugovora navedenih u nastavku, a koje je sklopio CCIPB, postupa kao prema jednoj i jedinstvenoj mjeri:
airport services agreement signed on 30 June 2005 with Ryanair and marketing services agreement signed on the same date with AMS, with regard to the Pau-London Stansted route,
Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke sklopljen 30. lipnja 2005. s društvom Ryanair i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama potpisan istoga dana s društvom AMS u pogledu linije Pau – London Stansted,
letter from the CCIPB to Ryanair of 25 September 2007 extending the terms of the airport services agreement of 30 June 2005 to the Pau-Charleroi route, and the marketing services agreement signed on the same date with AMS,letter from the CCIPB to Ryanair of 17 March 2008 extending the terms of the airport services agreement of 30 June 2005 to the Pau-Bristol route, and the marketing services agreement signed on 31 March 2008 with AMS with regard to this same route,
dopis komore CCIPB društvu Ryanair od 25. rujna 2007. u kojem su prošireni uvjeti Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 30. lipnja 2005. u pogledu linije Pau – Charleroi i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen istog dana s društvom AMS,dopis komore CCIPB društvu Ryanair od 17. ožujka 2008. u kojem su uvjeti Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 30. lipnja 2005. prošireni na liniju Pau – Bristol i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen 31. ožujka 2008. s društvom AMS u pogledu iste linije,
letter from the CCIPB to Ryanair of 16 June 2009 extending the terms of the airport services agreement of 30 June 2005 to the Pau-Bristol route, and the marketing services agreement signed on the same date with AMS with regard to this same route,
dopis komore CCIPB društvu Ryanair od 16. lipnja 2009. u kojem su uvjeti Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 30. lipnja 2005. prošireni na liniju Pau – Bristol i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen istoga dana s društvom AMS u pogledu iste linije,
marketing services agreement signed on 28 January 2010 with AMS with regard to the Pau-London, Pau-Charleroi and Pau-Beauvais routes.
Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen 28. siječnja 2010. s društvom AMS u pogledu linije Pau – London, Pau – Charleroi i Pau – Beauvais.
No airport services agreement was formally signed in parallel with this marketing services agreement.
Nijedan ugovor o uslugama zračne luke nije službeno potpisan istodobno kad i ovaj Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama.
However, an ‘implicit’ airport services agreement can be identified.
Međutim, može se prepoznati „implicitni” ugovor o uslugama zračne luke.
France has stated that it agrees with the approach taken in the extension decision to analyse together the airport services agreements and marketing services agreements signed at the same time.
Francuska je izjavila da se slaže s pristupom koji je primijenjen u odluci o proširenju postupka na temelju kojeg se ugovori o uslugama zračne luke i ugovori o marketinškim uslugama sklopljeni istodobno analiziraju zajedno.
On the other hand, certain interested third parties, particularly the CCIPB and Ryanair, question this approach as they consider that the marketing services agreements should be analysed separately.
Naprotiv, određene treće zainteresirane osobe, posebno CCIBP i Ryanair, osporavaju taj pristup jer smatraju da je potrebno zasebno analizirati ugovore o marketinškim uslugama.
However, the facts on record confirm that the approach taken in the extension decision, and approved by France, is well-founded.
Međutim, elementi iz spisa potvrdili su osnovanost pristupa primijenjenog u odluci o proširenju postupka koji je odobrila Francuska.
This is clear in the case of Transavia and the agreement signed with Ryanair in 2003, as the marketing services and airport services are the subject of a single agreement.
To je jasno u slučaju društva Transavia i Ugovora sklopljenog 2003. s društvom Ryanair jer su marketinške usluge i usluge zračne luke obuhvaćene samo jednim Ugovorom.
For the reasons given in recitals 289 to 313, this is also valid for the other agreements signed with Ryanair and AMS.
Iz razloga navedenih u uvodnim izjavama od 289. do 313. to vrijedi i za ostale ugovore sklopljene s društvima Ryanair i AMS.
Firstly, each marketing services agreement was signed at virtually the same time as an airport services agreement.
Ponajprije, svaki ugovor o marketinškim uslugama sklopljen je gotovo istodobno kad i ugovor o uslugama zračne luke.
These two types of agreement were signed on each occasion on the same date, except in the case of the marketing services agreement of 31 March 2008, which, however, was signed very shortly after (14 days) an airport services agreement for the Pau-Bristol route, which was the same route covered by the marketing services agreement.
Naime, ti su ugovori svaki puta sklopljeni istoga dana, osim u slučaju Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 31. ožujka 2008. koji je, međutim, potpisan ubrzo (14 dana) nakon Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke u pogledu linije Pau – Bristol koja je predviđena Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama.
Moreover, the two types of agreement were signed by the same parties.
Usto, obje vrste ugovora sklapale su iste stranke.
AMS is actually a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ryanair and its managers are senior Ryanair executives.
Naime, AMS je društvo kći u stopostotnom vlasništvu društva Ryanair i njezin se voditeljski kadar sastoji od visokih rukovoditelja društva Ryanair.
As a result, Ryanair and AMS form a single economic entity, in the sense that AMS acts in Ryanair’s interests and under its control, and AMS’s profits go to Ryanair in the form of dividends or increased company value.
Prema tome, Ryanair i AMS predstavljaju jedan gospodarski subjekt, u smislu da AMS djeluje u skladu s interesom društva Ryanair i pod njegovom kontrolom te da su koristi koje stvara namijenjene društvu Ryanair, u obliku dividendi ili povećanja vrijednosti društva.
Moreover, as will be detailed further on, the various marketing services agreements are connected with the operation of certain routes by Ryanair from Pau airport.
Usto, kao što će biti podrobnije objašnjeno u nastavku, različiti ugovori o marketinškim uslugama povezani su s upravljanjem društva Ryanair zračnim linijama s polaskom iz Zračne luke Pau.
The marketing services agreements in fact indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate these routes, and they were also signed at the same time as airport services agreements between the CCIPB and Ryanair for these same routes.
U ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama navedeno je, naime, da proizlaze iz obveze društva Ryanair da upravlja tim linijama te su istodobno sklopljeni s ugovorima o uslugama zračne luke između komore CCIPB i društva Ryanair u pogledu istih linija.
Consequently, the fact that the marketing services agreements were signed by the CCIPB with AMS and not Ryanair cannot prevent a marketing services agreement and an airport services agreement that were signed at the same time from being regarded as forming a single transaction, particularly for the purpose of analysing these agreements in the light of the MEO test, and in the context of this analysis, Ryanair and AMS from being regarded as forming a single economic entity.
Prema tome, činjenica da je ugovore o marketinškim uslugama CCIPB sklopio s društvom ASM, a ne s društvom Ryanair, ne bi smjela spriječiti da se istodobno sklopljeni ugovori o marketinškim uslugama i ugovori o uslugama zračne luke mogu smatrati jednom i jedinstvenom transakcijom, posebno za potrebe analize tih ugovora s obzirom na načelo subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu i da se u kontekstu te analize Ryanair i AMS trebaju smatrati jednim gospodarskim subjektom.
Lastly, a number of other facts, set out in recitals 292 to 313 for each agreement, reveal additional very close links between, on the one hand, each marketing services agreement and, on the other hand, the airport services agreement signed at the same time as the latter.
Naposljetku, određeni broj drugih elemenata, iznesenih u uvodnim izjavama od 292. do 313. u pogledu svakog ugovora, ukazuju na dodatne vrlo bliske veze između svih istodobno sklopljenih ugovora o marketinškim uslugama, s jedne strane, i ugovora o uslugama zračne luke, s druge strane.
Accordingly, the marketing services agreement of 30 June 2005 was signed for a term of 5 years, just like the airport services agreement signed on the same date, through which Ryanair undertook to offer a daily service between London and Pau.
Tako je Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama od 30. lipnja 2005. potpisan na pet godina, kao i Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke sklopljen istog dana, kojim se Ryanair obvezao pružati svakodnevnu uslugu između Zračnih luka London i Pau.
Moreover, the marketing services agreement establishes an explicit link between itself and the air transport services covered by the airport services agreement:
Usto, Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama uspostavljena je izričita veza između tog Ugovora i usluga zračnog prijevoza iz Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke:
The marketing services agreement of 30 June 2005 also indicates as follows in its preamble:
U preambuli Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 30. lipnja 2005. nadalje je navedeno sljedeće:
Furthermore, according to the marketing services agreement, the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting messages and links on the Pau destination page of the Ryanair website, and inserting a link to the website designated by the CCIPB on the English homepage of the same website.
S druge strane, u skladu s Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama, usluge koje AMS treba pružiti obuhvaćaju postavljanje poruka i poveznica na stranicu namijenjenu odredištu Pau na web-mjestu društva Ryanair i postavljanje poveznice koja vodi na web-mjesto koje je odredila komora CCIPB na engleskoj početnoj stranici istog web-mjesta.
However, the Pau destination page of the Ryanair website is mainly targeted at people who have already decided to use or are likely to consider using Ryanair’s services to Pau.
Međutim, stranica namijenjena odredištu Pau na web-mjestu društva Ryanair namijenjena je uglavnom osobama koje su se već odlučile poslužiti ili koje bi se mogle poslužiti uslugama društva Ryanair u smjeru odredišta Pau.
As for the website homepage, this is certainly targeted at a much wider audience, but only its English version is covered by the marketing services agreement.
Kada je riječ o početnoj stranici web-mjesta, ona je namijenjena znatno široj javnosti, ali je Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama obuhvaćena samo njezina engleska verzija.
This further indicates that the marketing services are essentially designed to promote Ryanair’s services between Pau and London, and not equally travel to Pau and its region.
To je dodatni pokazatelj da su marketinške usluge osmišljene uglavnom kako bi se osigurala promidžba usluga društva Ryanair između Paua i Londona, a ne, neselektivno, promidžba posjeta Pauu i njegovoj regiji.
If they were designed to promote Pau and its region to all tourists and business travellers likely to be interested in the region, the CCIPB would in all likelihood have asked for the link to a website of its choosing to be placed on all, or at least several versions of, the Ryanair website homepage, and not just the English version.
Naime, ako je svrha tih usluga promicati Pau i njegovu regiju pred svim turistima i poslovnim osobama koje bi mogle iskazati interes za tu regiju, vjerojatno je da bi komora CCIPB zatražila da poveznica na web-mjesto po njezinu izboru bude postavljena na svim verzijama ili barem na više verzija početnih stranica web-mjesta društva Ryanair, a ne samo na engleskoj verziji.
Lastly, the marketing services agreement of 30 June 2005 stipulates as follows:
Naposljetku, Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama od 30. lipnja 2005. propisano je sljedeće:
‘If any of the material conditions of trading change substantially following the signature of this agreement, including the level of inbound passengers generated as a result of this Agreement, the Parties will in good faith undertake to amend the contract so as to reflect such a change’.
„u slučaju znatne izmjene ključnih komercijalnih uvjeta nakon potpisivanja ovog Ugovora, posebno razine putnika u dolasku ostvarene na temelju ovog Ugovora, Stranke se u dobroj vjeri obvezuju izmijeniti ovaj Ugovor kako bi se u obzir uzela dotična izmjena”.
The level of inbound passengers is therefore presented as a ‘material condition of trading’ of the marketing services agreement, which once again confirms that it is not so much travel to Pau and its region in general that is primarily pursued by the marketing services but, much more specifically, the maximisation of the number of passengers on Ryanair flights to Pau.
Razina putnika u dolasku stoga je predstavljena kao „ključni komercijalni uvjet” Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama, čime je dodatno potvrđeno da glavni cilj marketinških usluga nije općenita posjećenost Paua i njegove regije, nego, znatno određenije, što više povećati broj putnika na letovima društva Ryanair u smjeru Paua.
Similar elements can be found in the other marketing services agreements.
Slični su elementi navedeni u ostalim ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama.
The marketing services agreement of 25 September 2007 was concluded for a term of 5 years, which corresponds to the period for which the letter from the CCIPB to Ryanair of the same date extended the terms of the airport services agreement of 30 June 2005 to the Pau-Charleroi route.
Kada je riječ o Ugovoru o marketinškim uslugama od 25. rujna 2007., on je sklopljen na pet godina, što odgovara razdoblju za koje su istoga dana dopisom komore CCIPB društvu Ryanair prošireni uvjeti Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke od 30. lipnja 2005. na liniju Pau – Charleroi.
Moreover, the marketing services agreement indicates as follows:
Usto, Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama utvrđeno je sljedeće:
‘This Agreement is rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate on a route between PAU and CHARLEROI with a weekly service (3 frequencies per week) subject to force Majeure per full year of operation. CCIPB, therefore, has the potential to advertise the business and tourist attractions of the PAU BEARN and its region to large numbers of tourists and business travellers accessing www.ryanair.com, and to attract an increased number of BELGIUM-originating passengers with high spending ability to PAU BEARN’.
„ovaj Ugovor proizlazi iz obveze društva Ryanair da u poslovnoj godini posluje na liniji između PAUA i CHARLEROIA s tri leta tjedno, osim u slučaju više sile. Komora CCIPB u tom pogledu može oglašavati komercijalne i turističke atrakcije PAU BEARNA i njegove regije ciljajući veliki broj turista i poslovnih putnika koji posjećuju web-mjesto www.ryanair.com te u PAU BEARN privući veći broj putnika velike kupovne moći iz Belgije”.
The agreement’s preamble also states as follows:
U preambuli Ugovora nadalje je navedeno sljedeće:
Furthermore, according to the marketing services agreement, the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting a link to the website designated by the CCIPB on the Belgian and Dutch homepage of the Ryanair website.
S druge strane, u skladu s Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama, usluge koje AMS treba pružiti obuhvaćaju postavljanje poveznice na stranicu koju odredi komora CCIPB na belgijsku i nizozemsku početnu stranicu web-mjesta društva Ryanair.
The marketing services are not therefore targeted at anyone who might be convinced to stay in Pau or its region, but specifically at those people who are most likely to use Ryanair’s services between Charleroi and Pau, namely inhabitants of Belgium and the Netherlands.
Marketinške usluge stoga nisu namijenjene osobama koje bi se moglo potaknuti na boravak u Pauu ili njegovoj regiji, nego su usmjerene izričito na osobe koje bi se najvjerojatnije služile uslugama društva Ryanair između Charleroia i Paua, odnosno na stanovnike Belgije i Nizozemske.
The marketing services agreement of 31 March 2008 was concluded for a period between 16 May and 13 September 2008, which corresponds to the period for which Ryanair undertook to operate a route to Bristol, as indicated by the following wording in said agreement:
Kada je riječ o Ugovoru o marketinškim uslugama od 31. ožujka 2008., on je sklopljen na razdoblje od 16. svibnja do 13. rujna 2008. koje odgovara razdoblju u kojem se Ryanair obvezao poslovati na liniji prema Bristolu, kao što je navedeno u sljedećoj rečenici istog Ugovora: