natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The waste codes listed in Annex IIIB and Part 2 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 should not be covered by the preliminary correlation table because these are applicable to shipments primarily within the European Union where customs authorities are normally not involved.
Oznake otpada navedene u Prilogu III.B i Prilogu V. dijelu 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1013/2006 ne bi trebale biti obuhvaćene preliminarnom korelacijskom tablicom jer se one prvenstveno primjenjuju na pošiljke unutar Europske unije, u koje carinska tijela uobičajeno nisu uključena.
Possible correlations for each of the entries of waste listed in Annex IIIA to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 can be derived using the correlations of the waste codes listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006.
Moguće korelacije za svaki od unosa otpada navedenih u Prilogu III.A Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006 mogu se izvesti s pomoću korelacija oznaka otpada navedenih u Prilogu III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006.
No correlation of entries of waste from Annex IVA to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 is made as this Annex is empty.
Za unose otpada iz Priloga IV.A Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006 korelacija se ne provodi jer je taj Prilog prazan.
Due to differences in the goods covered by the codes of the Combined Nomenclature provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 [2] (‘CN codes’) and the entries of waste listed in Annexes III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (‘waste codes’), it is not always possible to achieve a clear or complete match between them.
Zbog razlika između robe obuhvaćene oznakama kombinirane nomenklature predviđenima u Uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2658/87 [2] („oznake KN”) i unosa otpada navedenih u prilozima III., IV., i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006 („oznake otpada”) između njih nije moguće uvijek postići jasno ili potpuno pridruživanje.
Where there are such differences, it is necessary to establish the correlation between the codes on the basis of an approximation with a view to achieving the best match possible.
Ako takve razlike postoje, korelaciju između oznaka potrebno je uspostaviti na temelju približne procjene u cilju postizanja najboljeg mogućeg pridruživanja.
Stakeholders were consulted on the basis of a study commissioned by the Commission to assess the nature of the goods covered by the CN codes and waste codes, respectively, and the draft correlation table resulting from the study and the stakeholder consultation was endorsed by the Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section of the Customs Code Committee in January 2015.
Na temelju studije koju je Komisija naručila kako bi procijenila prirodu robe obuhvaćene oznakama KN odnosno oznakama otpada provedeno je savjetovanje s dionicima te je u siječnju 2015. Odsjek za tarifnu i statističku nomenklaturu Odbora za Carinski zakonik odobrio nacrt korelacijske tablice nastale na temelju te studije i savjetovanja s dionicima.
The preliminary correlation table should be adopted on the basis of that draft.
Preliminarnu korelacijsku tablicu trebalo bi donijeti na temelju tog nacrta.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 39 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3],
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog člankom 39. Direktive 2008/98/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [3],
A preliminary table showing the correlation between the codes of the Combined Nomenclature (‘CN codes’) provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 and the entries of waste listed in Annexes III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 is set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Preliminarna tablica s korelacijama između oznaka kombinirane nomenklature („oznake KN”) predviđenih u Uredbi (EEZ) br. 2658/87 i unosa otpada navedenih u prilozima III., IV. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006 utvrđena je u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.
Correlation table between codes of the combined nomenclature provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 and the entries of waste listed in Annexes III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006
Korelacijska tablica između oznaka kombinirane nomenklature predviđenih u Uredbi (EEZ) br. 2658/87 i unosa otpada navedenih u prilozima III., IV. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006
Introductory notes
Uvodne napomene
The correlation table between codes of the combined nomenclature (‘CN codes’) and entries of waste listed in Annexes III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (‘waste codes’) is presented in two alternative ways in Tables A and B.
Korelacijska tablica između oznaka kombinirane nomenklature („oznake KN”) i unosa otpada utvrđenih u prilozima III., IV. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006 („oznake otpada”) predstavljena je na dva različita načina u tablicama A i B.
In Table A, column 1 lists waste codes sorted in ascending alphanumerical order which are correlated with CN codes listed in column 2.
U Tablici A u stupcu 1. nalaze se oznake otpada poredane rastućim alfanumeričkim redoslijedom i u korelaciji s oznakama KN navedenima u stupcu 2.
In Table B, column 3 lists CN codes sorted in ascending numerical order which are correlated with waste codes listed in column 4.
U Tablici B u stupcu 3. nalaze se oznake KN poredane rastućim numeričkim redoslijedom i u korelaciji s oznakama otpada navedenim u stupcu 4.
The waste codes of column 1 and the CN codes of column 3 appear only once in their respective columns.
Oznake otpada u stupcu 1. i oznake KN u stupcu 3. pojavljuju se samo jednom u svojim stupcima.
The waste codes selected for correlation from the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 are those codes that were established through international agreements, in particular under the Basel Convention or by the OECD.
Oznake otpada iz priloga Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006 koje su odabrane za korelaciju oznake su utvrđene međunarodnim sporazumima, a posebno one koje su utvrđene u skladu s Baselskom konvencijom ili koje je utvrdio OECD.
For reasons of simplicity, this correlation table does not take into account that certain waste codes established through international agreements have indents or sub-indents (e.g. B3010).
U cilju pojednostavnjenja prikaza u ovoj se korelacijskoj tablici ne uzima u obzir da određene oznake otpada utvrđene međunarodnim sporazumima imaju alineje ili podalineje (npr. B3010).
In Table A, some waste codes are correlated with more than one CN code and in Table B, some CN codes are correlated with more than one waste code.
U tablici A neke oznake otpada u korelaciji su s više od jedne oznake KN, a u tablici B neke su oznake KN u korelaciji s više od jedne oznake otpada.
For the purpose of determining which of the several codes is applicable, the descriptions of the codes in their respective Regulations shall be taken into consideration.
Za potrebe određivanja koja je od više navedenih oznaka primjenjiva u obzir će se uzimati opisi oznaka iz njihovih odgovarajućih uredaba.
Column 4
Stupac 4.
Waste code [1]
Oznaka otpada [1]
CN code [2] [3]
Oznaka KN [2] [3]
The description of waste codes is provided in Annexes III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006.
Opisi oznaka otpada nalaze se u prilozima III., IV. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1013/2006.
The description of CN codes is provided in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1754 of 6 October 2015 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 285, 30.10.2015, p. 1).
Opis oznaka KN nalazi se u Provedbenoj uredbi Komisije (EU) 2015/1754 оd 6. listopada 2015. o izmjenama Priloga I. Uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2658/87 o tarifnoj i statističkoj nomenklaturi i o Zajedničkoj carinskoj tarifi (SL L 285, 30.10.2015., str. 1.).
The abbreviation ‘ex’ before a CN code implies that only part of the CN code is concerned.
Skraćenica „ex” ispred oznake KN znači da je u pitanju samo dio oznake KN.
Such CN codes may also cover goods other than the waste(s) covered by the respective waste code(s).
Takve oznake KN mogu obuhvaćati i robu koja nije otpad obuhvaćen odgovarajućom oznakom otpada (ili više njih).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1246
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1246
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz čeličnih šipki visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed on 29 January 2016 a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars (‘HFP rebars’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’) by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/113 (‘the provisional Regulation’) [2].
Europska komisija („Komisija”) uvela je 29. siječnja 2016. Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2016/113 („Privremena uredba”) [2] privremenu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz čeličnih šipki visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK” ili „predmetna zemlja”).
The investigation was initiated on 30 April 2015 [3] following a complaint lodged on 17 March 2015 by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of HFP rebars.
Ispitni postupak pokrenut je 30. travnja 2015. [3] nakon zahtjeva koji je 17. ožujka 2015. podnijela Europska federacija proizvođača željeza i čelika („Eurofer” ili „podnositelj zahtjeva”) u ime proizvođača koji čine više od 25 % ukupne proizvodnje čeličnih šipki visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton u Uniji.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Zahtjev je sadržavao dokaz dampinga navedenog proizvoda i materijalne štete koja je iz toga proizašla, što se smatralo dostatnim opravdanjem za pokretanje ispitnog postupka.
Registration of imports
Evidentiranje uvoza
By Regulation (EU) 2015/2386 [4], the Commission made imports of HFP rebars originating in the PRC subject to registration as of 19 December 2015 following a request by the complainant which contained sufficient evidence that the relevant conditions set out in Article 10 of the basic Regulation were met.
Komisija je Uredbom (EU) 2015/2386 [4] uvoz čeličnih šipki visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton podrijetlom iz NRK-a uvjetovala evidentiranjem s početkom od 19. prosinca 2015., nakon što je podnositelj zahtjeva podnio zahtjev koji je sadržavao dostatne dokaze da su ispunjeni odgovarajući uvjeti utvrđeni člankom 10. Osnovne uredbe.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (‘the provisional disclosure’), Union producers, Chinese exporting producers, importers, users, and an association of importers made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Nakon objave bitnih činjenica i razmatranja na temelju kojih je uvedena privremena antidampinška pristojba („privremena objava”) proizvođači iz Unije, kineski proizvođači izvoznici, uvoznici, korisnici i jedno udruženje uvoznika dostavili su pisane podneske u kojima su iznijeli svoje stavove o privremenim nalazima.
Hearings took place with Chinese exporting producers and with unrelated importers and users in the Union.
Saslušanja su održana s kineskim proizvođačima izvoznicima te s nepovezanim uvoznicima i korisnicima iz Unije.
The Commission considered the oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties and, where appropriate, modified the provisional findings accordingly.
Komisija je razmotrila podnesene usmene i pisane primjedbe zainteresiranih strana te je, prema potrebi, u skladu s tim izmijenila privremene nalaze.
One interested party requested the intervention of the Hearing Officer to verify the correctness of the data from the analogue country, since the data was not disclosed in the provisional disclosure due to its confidential nature.
Jedna zainteresirana strana zatražila je intervenciju službenika za saslušanje kako bi se provjerila ispravnost podataka iz analogne zemlje jer zbog njihove povjerljive naravi ti podaci nisu otkriveni u privremenoj objavi.
The Hearing Officer has verified the data and has found no errors.
Službenik za saslušanje provjerio je podatke i nije pronašao pogreške.
The same interested party also requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer in order to express its doubts on the calculation method of the duties.
Ista zainteresirana strana zatražila je saslušanje sa službenikom za saslušanje i kako bi izrazila svoje sumnje u pogledu metode izračuna pristojbi.
In conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer found that the Commission services have conducted the investigation in accordance with accepted and regular practice.
Nalaz službenika za saslušanje u zaključku saslušanja bio je da su službe Komisije ispitni postupak provele u skladu s prihvaćenom i redovitom praksom.
The complainant considered that the target profit in the provisional Regulation was not correctly established and not appropriate for the HFP rebars industry.
Podnositelj zahtjeva smatrao je da u Privremenoj uredbi ciljna dobit nije ispravno utvrđena i da nije primjerena za industriju čeličnih šipki visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton.
It questioned the method used to establish that profit and asked the Commission to deepen its investigation into that issue.
Doveo je u pitanje metodu upotrijebljenu za utvrđivanje te dobiti i od Komisije zatražio da produbi ispitni postupak u tom smislu.
Subsequent to the registration of imports, the interested parties had a period of 20 days to submit their comments.
Nakon evidentiranja uvoza zainteresirane strane imale su rok od 20 dana za podnošenje primjedaba.
Comments were received from Union producers, Chinese exporting producers, importers, users, and an association of importers.
Primljene su primjedbe od proizvođača iz Unije, kineskih proizvođača izvoznika, uvoznika, korisnika i jednog udruženja uvoznika.
In order to verify the questionnaires replies mentioned in recitals (8) and (10) above, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following parties:
Kako bi se provjerili odgovori na upitnike navedeni u prethodnim uvodnim izjavama 8. i 10., obavljeni su posjeti radi provjere u poslovnim prostorima sljedećih strana:
Union producers
proizvođači iz Unije:
Megasa Siderur, Spain
Megasa Siderur, Španjolska,
Riva Acier, France
Riva Acier, Francuska,
SN Maia, Portugal
SN Maia, Portugal;
Unrelated importers in the Union
nepovezani uvoznici iz Unije:
CMC Ltd, United Kingdom
CMC Ltd, Ujedinjena Kraljevina,
Eurosteel Ltd, United Kingdom
Eurosteel Ltd, Ujedinjena Kraljevina,
Ronly Ltd, United Kingdom.
Ronly Ltd, Ujedinjena Kraljevina.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intends to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of HFP rebars (‘the definitive disclosure’).
Komisija je sve strane obavijestila o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih namjerava uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz čeličnih šipki visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton („konačna objava”).
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the definitive disclosure.
Svim je stranama dano razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle dati primjedbe na konačnu objavu.
In the absence of comments concerning the method of sampling, the provisional findings set out in recitals (6) to (11) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Budući da nije bilo primjedaba u vezi s metodom odabira uzorka, potvrđuju se privremeni nalazi iz uvodnih izjava 6. do 11. Privremene uredbe.
As set out in recital (16) of the provisional Regulation the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015 (‘the investigation period’).
Kako je utvrđeno uvodnom izjavom 16. Privremene uredbe, ispitnim postupkom u pogledu dampinga i štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. travnja 2014. do 31. ožujka 2015. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka”).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Ispitivanjem kretanja koja su važna za procjenu štete obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2011. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka („razmatrano razdoblje”).
As set out in recitals (17) to (19) of the provisional Regulation, the product subject to investigation are high fatigue performance iron or steel concrete reinforcing bars and rods made of iron, non-alloy steel or alloy steel (but excluding stainless steel, high-speed steel and silico-manganese steel), not further worked than hot-rolled, but including those twisted after rolling; these bars and rods contain indentations, ribs, grooves or other deformations produced during the rolling process or are twisted after rolling.
Kako je utvrđeno uvodnim izjavama 17. do 19. Privremene uredbe, proizvod koji podliježe ispitnom postupku jesu željezne ili čelične šipke i žice visoke otpornosti na zamor za armirani beton od željeza, nelegiranog čelika ili legiranog čelika (osim od nehrđajućeg čelika, brzoreznog čelika ili silicijskomanganskog čelika), samo toplovaljane i dalje neobrađene, ali uključujući one usukane nakon valjanja; te šipke i žice imaju udubljenja, rebra, žljebove ili druge deformacije dobivene tijekom postupka valjanja ili su usukane nakon valjanja.
The key characteristic of high fatigue performance is the ability to endure repeated stress without breaking and, specifically, the ability to resist in excess of 4,5 million fatigue cycles using a stress ratio (min/max) of 0,2 and a stress range exceeding 150 MPa.
Ključna značajka visoke otpornosti na zamor jest sposobnost izdržljivosti uslijed opetovanog naprezanja bez lomljenja i, posebno, sposobnost izdržljivosti više od 4,5 milijuna ciklusa opterećenja s pomoću omjera naprezanja (min/max) od 0,2 i rasponom naprezanja većim od 150 MPa.
The product concerned is the product described in recital (15) above, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex72142000, ex72283020, ex72283041, ex72283049, ex72283061, ex72283069, ex72283070 and ex72283089.
Predmetni proizvod jest proizvod opisan u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 15., podrijetlom iz NRK-a, trenutačno obuhvaćen oznakama KN ex72142000, ex72283020, ex72283041, ex72283049, ex72283061, ex72283069, ex72283070 i ex72283089.
Following the provisional disclosure, an importer claimed that it would be difficult in practice to separate the product concerned from other types of rebars, falling under the same CN codes.
Nakon privremene objave jedan je uvoznik tvrdio da će u praksi biti teško odvojiti predmetni proizvod od ostalih vrsta šipki obuhvaćenih istim oznakama KN.
It alleged that the Union customs authorities could thus mistakenly impose anti-dumping duties on other products not concerned by the investigation and not impose duties on the product concerned.
Tvrdio je da bi carinska tijela Unije zbog toga mogla greškom uvesti antidampinške pristojbe na ostale proizvode na koje se ispitni postupak ne odnosi, a ne uvesti pristojbe na predmetni proizvod.
As explained in recital (18) of the provisional Regulation, the product definition exclusively corresponds to the requirements of the British Standard BS4449 and is typically distinguishable by CARES certification and markings embossed on the rebars themselves.
Kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 18. Privremene uredbe, definicija proizvoda isključivo odgovara zahtjevima iz britanskog standarda BS4449 te se obično može razlikovati na temelju CARES certifikata i reljefnih oznaka na samim šipkama.
The importer could not specify in what way the product definition would overlap or be confused with the definition of other types of rebars.
Uvoznik nije mogao precizno navesti na koji bi se način definicija proizvoda preklapala ili mogla zamijeniti s definicijom ostalih vrsta šipki.
Therefore, the Commission considered that there is no problem of practical implementation of the measures and rejected the claim.
Komisija je stoga smatrala da u pogledu praktične provedbe mjera ne postoji problem i tvrdnju je odbila.
The Commission observes that the certification has not been included in the product description in order to prevent the possibility of circumvention through imports of non-certified goods that would only be certified once inside the Union.
Komisija primjećuje da certifikat nije uključen u opis proizvoda kako bi se spriječila mogućnost izbjegavanja mjera uvozom necertificirane robe koja će se certificirati tek po ulasku u Uniju.
Following definitive disclosure, two interested parties claimed that the product concerned is in fact being sold also in Spain and in Portugal, and that as a consequence the Commission's consumption figures do not include all Union consumption.
Nakon konačne objave dvije zainteresirane strane tvrdile su da se predmetni proizvod de facto prodaje i u Španjolskoj i Portugalu te da stoga u Komisijine brojke o potrošnji nije uključena sva potrošnja u Uniji.
The interested parties based the claim on a statement on the website of a Union producer, which listed Spain and Portugal as countries that use high-ductility rebars.
Te zainteresirane strane svoju su tvrdnju temeljile na izjavi jednog proizvođača iz Unije na njegovoj internetskoj stranici u kojoj se Španjolska i Portugal navode kao zemlje koje upotrebljavaju šipke visoke duktilnosti.
The Commission reaffirms that rebars corresponding to Spanish and Portuguese standards are not included in the scope of the product concerned, because the technical requirements of the rebars in Spain and in Portugal do not correspond with the product definition of the present investigation, as set out in recital (15).
Komisija ponovno potvrđuje da šipke koje odgovaraju španjolskim i portugalskim standardima nisu uključene u opseg dotičnog proizvoda zato što tehnički zahtjevi za šipke u Španjolskoj i Portugalu ne odgovaraju definiciji proizvoda u ovom ispitnom postupku, kako je utvrđeno uvodnom izjavom 15.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the product concerned and the like product, the conclusions reached in recitals (17) to (19) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Budući da nije bilo drugih primjedaba u pogledu predmetnog proizvoda i istovjetnog proizvoda, potvrđuju se zaključci iz uvodnih izjava 17. do 19. Privremene uredbe.
The details of the dumping calculation are set out in recitals (21) to (45) of the provisional Regulation.
Pojedinosti o izračunu dampinga navedene su u uvodnim izjavama 21. do 45. Privremene uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, two interested parties repeated their concerns, described in the recital (22) of the provisional Regulation, as to the fact that both groups of companies were considered to be related for the purpose of the dumping and injury margins calculations.
Nakon privremene objave dvije zainteresirane strane ponovno su izrazile zabrinutost, kako je opisano u uvodnoj izjavi 22. Privremene uredbe, u pogledu toga što su se za potrebe izračuna dampinške marže i marže štete obje grupe društava smatrale povezanima.
These parties repeated previous arguments concerning the lack of any operational links between the two groups and the absence of involvement in each other decision making process.
Te su strane ponovile prethodne argumente o nepostojanju bilo kakvih poveznica u poslovanju između tih dviju grupa i o neuključenosti jedne u postupak donošenja odluka one druge.
Additionally the interested parties pointed out that in anti-dumping procedures conducted by third countries (namely Malaysia, Thailand and United States) they were treated as separate entities.
Zainteresirane strane dodatno su istaknule da se u antidampinškim postupcima koje su vodile treće zemlje (odnosno Malezija, Tajland i Sjedinjene Američke Države) prema njima odnosilo kao prema zasebnim subjektima.
The interested parties in question reiterated the same arguments in this regard after the definitive disclosure.
Predmetne zainteresirane strane nakon konačne objave ponovno su u tom pogledu istaknule iste argumente.