natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘This Agreement is rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate on a route between PAU and BRISTOL with a weekly service (3 frequencies per week), from May 16th 2008 to September 13th 2008 subject to force Majeure, for one year of operation. CCIPB, therefore, has the potential to advertise the business and tourist attractions of the PAU BEARN and its region to large numbers of tourists and business travellers accessing www.ryanair.com, and to attract an increased number of ENGLISH-originating passengers with high spending ability to PAU BEARN’.
„ovaj Ugovor proizlazi iz obveze društva Ryanair da od 16. svibnja 2008. do 13. rujna 2008., tijekom jedne poslovne godine, tjedno posluje na liniji između PAUA i BRISTOLA s tri leta tjedno, osim u slučaju više sile. U tom pogledu CCIPB može promicati turističke i komercijalne atrakcije PAU BEARNA i njegove regije pred velikim brojem turista i poslovnih putnika koji posjećuju web-mjesto www.ryanair.com te u PAU BEARN privući sve veći broj putnika engleskog podrijetla velike kupovne moći”.
The agreement’s preamble also states as follows:‘… [Airport Marketing Services] is the only company that has the potential to target large numbers of potential Ryanair passengers in order to promote the tourist and business attractions in the region’.
U njegovoj je preambuli nadalje navedeno sljedeće: „[…] [Airport Marketing Services] jedini je u mogućnosti ciljati veliki broj potencijalnih putnika društva Ryanair radi promidžbe turističkih i komercijalnih atrakcija regije”.
Furthermore, according to the marketing services agreement, the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting a link to the website designated by the CCIPB on the English homepage of the Ryanair website.
S druge strane, u skladu s Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama, usluge koje AMS treba pružiti obuhvaćaju postavljanje poveznice na stranicu koju odredi komora CCIPB na englesku početnu stranicu web-mjesta društva Ryanair.
The marketing services agreement of 16 June 2009 was concluded for a period between 1 April and 24 October 2009, which corresponds to the period for which Ryanair undertook to operate a Pau-Bristol route, as indicated by the following wording in said agreement:
Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama od 16. lipnja 2009. sklopljen je na razdoblje od 1. travnja do 24. listopada 2009. koje odgovara razdoblju u kojem se Ryanair obvezao poslovati na liniji Pau – Bristol, kao što je navedeno u sljedećoj rečenici istog Ugovora:
‘This Agreement is rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate on a route between PAU and BRISTOL with a weekly service (2 frequencies per week), from April 1st 2009 to October 24th 2009, that is 60 projected flights for the complete 2009 schedule, subject to force Majeure, for one year of operation. CCIPB, therefore, has the potential to advertise the business and tourist attractions of the PAU BEARN and its region to large numbers of tourists and business travellers accessing www.ryanair.com, and to attract an increased number of ENGLISH-originating passengers with high spending ability to PAU BEARN’.
„ovaj Ugovor proizlazi iz obveze društva Ryanair da od 1. travnja 2009. do 24. listopada 2009., tijekom jedne poslovne godine, tjedno posluje na liniji između PAUA i BRISTOLA s dva leta tjedno, odnosno 60 predviđenih letova za cijeli program 2009., osim u slučaju više sile. Komora CCIPB u tom pogledu može oglašavati komercijalne i turističke atrakcije PAU BEARNA i njegove regije ciljajući veliki broj turista i poslovnih putnika koji posjećuju web-mjesto www.ryanair.com te u PAU BEARN privući veći broj putnika velike kupovne moći iz Engleske”.
The marketing services agreement of 28 January 2010 stipulated that it would apply for one year from the launch of the air transport services that Ryanair had undertaken to operate from Pau to London, Charleroi and Beauvais according to Article 1 of this same agreement.
U pogledu Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama od 28. siječnja 2010., njime je predviđeno da se primjenjuje tijekom jedne godine nakon početka pružanja usluga zračnog prijevoza koje se Ryanair obvezao pružati iz Paua prema Londonu, Charleroiu i Beauvaisu u skladu s člankom 1. istog Ugovora.
This provision in itself reveals a clear link between the marketing services agreement and these air transport services.
Ta odredba predstavlja jasnu i očitu vezu između Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama i tih usluga zračnog prijevoza.
Moreover, Article 1 of the marketing services agreement stipulates as follows:
Usto, člankom 1. Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama utvrđeno je sljedeće:
‘This Agreement is rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to establish and to operate routes between:
„Ovaj Ugovor proizlazi iz obveze društva Ryanair da uspostavi linije i posluje na sljedećim linijama:
PAU and LONDON Stansted from 30 March 2010 with three flights per week during the whole year …
PAU i LONDON-Stansted od 30. ožujka 2010. s tri leta tjedno cijele godine,
PAU and CHARLEROI from 30 March 2010 with three flights per week for summer schedule …
PAU i CHARLEROI od 30. ožujka 2010. s tri leta tjedno u ljetnom razdoblju,
PAU and BEAUVAIS, from April 2010, with three flights per week for summer schedule …
PAU i BEAUVAIS od travnja 2010. s tri leta tjedno u ljetnom razdoblju.
CCIPB therefore, has the potential to advertise the business and tourist attractions of PAU and its region to large numbers of tourists and business travellers accessing www.ryanair.com, and to attract an increased number of inbound passengers with high spending ability’.
U tom pogledu komora CCIPB može promicati poduzetnike te komercijalne i turističke atrakcije PAU BEARNA i njegove regije pred velikim brojem turista i poslovnih putnika koji posjećuju web-mjesto www.ryanair.com te u PAU BEARN privući sve veći broj putnika velike kupovne moći”.
‘… [Airport Marketing Services] is the only company that has the potential to target large numbers of potential Ryanair passengers in order to promote the tourist and business attractions in the region’.
„[…] [Airport Marketing Services] jedini je poduzetnik koji može privući veliki broj potencijalnih putnika društva Ryanair u svrhu promidžbe poduzetnika te turističkih i komercijalnih atrakcija regije”.
Furthermore, like the 2005 marketing services agreement, the 2010 agreement stipulates that the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting messages and links on the Pau destination page of the Ryanair website, and inserting a link to the website designated by the CCIPB (i) on the English homepage of the Ryanair website for the route to London, (ii) on the Belgian and Dutch homepage of the Ryanair website for the route to Charleroi, and (iii) on the French homepage of the Ryanair website for the route to Beauvais.
S druge strane, kao i Ugovorom o marketinškim uslugama iz 2005., Ugovorom iz 2010. predviđene su usluge koje AMS mora pružiti, a koje obuhvaćaju postavljanje poruka i poveznica na stranicu namijenjenu odredištu Pau na web-mjestu društva Ryanair te postavljanje poveznice koja vodi na web-mjesto koje je odredila komora CCIPB na (i.) engleskoj početnoj stranici web-mjesta društva Ryanair u pogledu linije prema Londonu, (ii.) belgijskoj i nizozemskoj početnoj stranici web-mjesta društva Ryanair u pogledu linije prema Charleroiu te (iii.) francuskoj početnoj stranici web-mjesta društva Ryanair u pogledu linije prema Beauvaisu.
Lastly, the agreement stipulates that, if Ryanair’s air transport services to London, Charleroi and Beauvais, as defined in Article 1, are not announced or launched by February 2010, the agreement will lapse without liability to either party.
Naposljetku, Ugovorom je utvrđeno da ako usluge zračnog prijevoza društva Ryanair prema Londonu, Charleroiu i Beauvaisu navedene u njegovu članku 1. ne budu najavljene ili otvorene do veljače 2010., Ugovor će isteći bez odgovornosti prema ijednoj od stranaka.
This provision therefore establishes an additional link between the marketing services agreement and the Ryanair services to London, Charleroi and Beauvais.
Tom je odredbom stoga utvrđena dodatna veza između Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama i uslugama društva Ryanair prema Londonu, Charleroiu i Beauvaisu.
These elements of the various marketing services agreements show that the marketing services stipulated in these agreements are, in terms of both their duration and their nature, closely linked to the air transport services offered by Ryanair, as defined in the marketing services agreements and covered by the corresponding airport services agreements.
Ti elementi povezani s različitim ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama ukazuju na to da su marketinške usluge iz tih ugovora usko povezane, u pogledu njihova trajanja i prirode, s uslugama zračnog prijevoza koje nudi Ryanair i koje su navedene u ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama te su predmet odgovarajućih ugovora o uslugama zračne luke.
The marketing services agreements even indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate the transport services in question.
U ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama navedeno je i da proizlaze iz obveze društva Ryanair da upravlja dotičnim uslugama prijevoza.
Far from being designed to generally and equally increase travel to Pau and its region by tourists and business travellers, the marketing services specifically target those persons likely to use the Ryanair transport services covered by the marketing services agreements, and therefore have the primary objective of promoting those services.
Iako nisu osmišljene da bi turisti i poslovni ljudi općenito i nedvojbeno više posjećivali Pau i njegovu regiju, marketinške su usluge usmjerene posebno na osobe koje bi se mogle služiti prijevoznim uslugama društva Ryanair koje su predviđene ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama te je njihov glavni cilj promicati te usluge.
The marketing services agreements are therefore indissociable from the airport services agreements that they echo and from the air transport services that form their purpose.
Ugovori o marketinškim uslugama stoga su neodvojivi od ugovora o uslugama zračne luke na koje se odražavaju te od usluga zračnog prijevoza koje su predmet tog Ugovora.
The facts presented in recitals 286 to 305 also indicate that, in the absence of the routes in question (and therefore the associated airport services agreements), the marketing services agreements would not have been signed.
Iz činjenica iznesenih u uvodnim izjavama od 286. do 305. tim više proizlazi da kada ne bi bilo dotičnih zračnih linija (a time ni ugovora o uslugama zračne luke koji se na njih odnose), ugovori o marketinškim uslugama ne bi bili sklopljeni.
As shown in recitals 286 to 305, the marketing services agreements explicitly indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate certain routes. They also provide for marketing services that are essentially intended to promote those routes.
Naime, kao što je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama od 286. do 305., u ugovorima o marketinškim uslugama navedeno je i da proizlaze iz obveze društva Ryanair da upravlja određenim zračnim linijama te su tim ugovorima predviđene marketinške usluge čija je svrha osigurati promidžbu tih linija.
In this respect, the CCIPB’s argument that these two types of agreement should be analysed separately because they each have a different purpose is without merit.
U tom je pogledu bespredmetan argument komore CCIBP prema kojem je potrebno te dvije vrste ugovora analizirati zasebno jer „su njihovi ciljevi različiti”.
It is in fact clear from the above that the marketing services agreements form an integral part, together with the airport services agreements, of the commercial relations between Ryanair and the CCIPB with regard to the operation of those routes covered by these two types of agreement.
Naime, iz prethodno iznesenoga jasno slijedi da su ugovori o marketinškim uslugama sastavni dio, zajedno s ugovorima o uslugama zračne luke, komercijalnog odnosa između društva Ryanair i komore CCIPB kojima je uređeno upravljanje zračnim linijama iz tih dvaju ugovora.
Furthermore, it seems that, before signing the marketing services agreements in question, the CCIPB did not organise an invitation to tender open to all companies offering this type of service, nor did it consult various potential providers in order to compare their offers.
Nadalje, čini se da prije potpisivanja dotičnih ugovora o marketinškim uslugama komora CCIPB nije objavila javni natječaj otvoren za sve prijevoznike koji pružaju usluge te vrste, a nije čak ni razmotrila različite potencijalne pružatelje usluga kako bi usporedila njihove ponude.
More generally, it did not consider any providers other than the airlines concerned or their subsidiaries for the marketing services in question.
Općenito, komora CCIPB je kao pružatelje usluga uzela u obzir samo dotične zračne prijevoznike ili njihova društva kćeri za pružanje dotičnih marketinških usluga.
This confirms the close link of dependency between the marketing services agreements and the routes operated by Ryanair from Pau.
Time je potkrijepljena uska povezanost ugovora o marketinškim uslugama sa zračnim linijama s polaskom iz Paua kojima upravlja Ryanair.
If the marketing services agreements had been truly independent of the airport services agreements, the CCIPB would in all likelihood have consulted other providers in addition to AMS, particularly as it is a public body that routinely uses competitive procurement procedures.
Naime, da su ugovori o marketinškim uslugama bili doista neovisni o ugovorima o uslugama zračne luke, komora CCIPB bi vjerojatno, uz društvo AMS, tražila ponude od različitih pružatelja usluga tim više što je riječ o javnom tijelu koje često objavljuje javne natječaje za potrebe svoje nabave.
Moreover, it also seems that the signature of all the airport services agreements was dependent upon the signature of the marketing services agreements.
Usto, čini se i da je sklapanje svih ugovora o uslugama zračne luke bilo uvjetovano sklapanjem ugovora o marketinškim uslugama.
Firstly, according to France, the 2005 agreements (airport services agreement and marketing services agreement of 30 June 2005), although legally independent, were, however, closely linked, and the close link between the airport services agreement signed with Ryanair and the marketing services agreement signed with AMS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ryanair, cannot be denied.
Naime, kao prvo, prema mišljenju Francuske, oba su Ugovora iz 2005. (Ugovor o uslugama zračne luke i Ugovor o marketinškim uslugama od 30. lipnja 2005.), „iako pravno neovisna, svejedno usko povezana” te se „ne može poreći bliska veza između Ugovora o uslugama zračne luke sklopljenog s društvom Ryanair i Ugovora o marketinškim uslugama sklopljenog s društvom AMS, društvom kćeri u stopostotnom vlasništvu prijevoznika Ryanair”.
Given the significant similarities between the 2005 agreements and the agreements signed subsequently with Ryanair and AMS, France’s aforementioned comments can be easily applied to these subsequent agreements.
Uzevši u obzir izrazite sličnosti između Ugovora iz 2005. i kasnije sklopljenih ugovora s društvima Ryanair i AMS, prethodno navedene primjedbe Francuske mogu se lako primijeniti na te kasnije ugovore.
This tends to indicate that, at least in certain cases, Ryanair would not agree to operate a route and pay the airport’s general charges without a marketing services agreement signed between the airport operator and AMS.
To bi moglo ukazivati na to da, barem u nekim slučajevima, Ryanair nije htio upravljati zračnom linijom za koju mu se obračunavaju opće naknade zračne luke bez ugovora o marketinškim uslugama sklopljenog između upravitelja zračne luke i društva AMS.
This approach was also highlighted by the CRC in its report of 5 January 2007.
Takvo je mišljenje izrazio i CRC u svojem izvješću od 5. siječnja 2007..
It is clear from all the above that each marketing services agreement is indissociable from the underlying airport services agreement, forms a single transaction with the latter, and in all likelihood would not have been signed in the absence of the corresponding airport services agreement and the routes covered by these two agreements.
Iz prethodno navedenoga slijedi da je svaki ugovor o marketinškim uslugama neodvojiv od ugovora o uslugama zračne luke na kojem se temelji, da s njim predstavlja jednu transakciju i da vrlo vjerojatno ne bi bio sklopljen bez odgovarajućeg ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i zračnih linija koje su predviđene tim dvama ugovorima.
Consequently, each marketing services agreement and the airport services agreement signed at the same time should be analysed as a single measure in order to determine whether this agreement constitutes State aid.
Stoga, u pogledu utvrđivanja predstavlja li taj ugovor o marketinškim uslugama državnu potporu, potrebno je svaki ugovor o marketinškim uslugama i ugovor o uslugama zračne luke, koji su istodobno sklopljeni, analizirati kao jednu i jedinstvenu mjeru.
Application of the MEO test to the CCIPB with regard to the marketing services agreements
Primjena kriterija subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu na komoru CCIPB u pogledu ugovora o marketinškim uslugama
In order to apply the MEO test with regard to the marketing services agreements, the hypothetical MEO to be used for analysing the conduct of the CCIPB must be identified.
Radi primjene načela subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu u pogledu ugovora o marketinškim uslugama, potrebno je utvrditi na koji se pretpostavljeni tržišni subjekt treba pozvati za potrebe analize ponašanja komore CCIPB.
One approach would be to consider that the CCIPB signed the marketing services agreements as the airport operator, and therefore to compare its conduct with that of a hypothetical airport operator motivated by the prospect of profits.
Prvi pristup polazi od toga da je komora CCIPB sklopila ugovore o marketinškim uslugama u svojstvu upravitelja zračne luke, te se, prema tome, njezino ponašanje uspoređuje s onim pretpostavljenog upravitelja zračne luke koji se vodi izgledima za profitabilnost.
Another approach would be to consider that the CCIPB acted as a public body entrusted with a general interest mission, in this case the economic development of Pau and its region, and that it purchased these marketing services in order to fulfil that mission, regardless of its capacity as the operator of Pau airport.
Drugi pristup polazi od toga da je komora CCIPB djelovala u svojstvu javnog subjekta zaduženog za zadatak od općeg interesa, u ovom slučaju za gospodarski razvoj Paua i njegove regije te da je marketinške usluge kupila radi provedbe tog zadatka, neovisno o svojem svojstvu upravitelja Zračne luke Pau.
In the context of this second approach, according to the case-law, it needs to be verified, firstly, that the services in question met the ‘actual needs’ of the public purchaser and, secondly, that they were purchased at a price equal to or below a ‘market price’ or, in other words, that an MEO motivated by the prospect of profits and needing equivalent services (without necessarily being an airport operator) would have been prepared to accept similar conditions to those accepted by the CCIPB.
U okviru tog drugog pristupa, potrebno je u skladu sa sudskom praksom provjeriti, s jedne strane, odgovaraju li dotične usluge „stvarnim potrebama” javnog kupca i, s druge strane, jesu li one kupljene po cijeni koja je niža ili jednaka „tržišnoj cijeni” ili, drugim riječima, bi li subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji se vodi izgledima za profitabilnost i koji treba jednakovrijedne usluge (a da nije nužno upravitelj zračne luke) bio spreman prihvatiti uvjete slične onima koje je prihvatila komora CCIPB.
The comments of certain interested third parties tend to favour the second approach, at least implicitly.
Opaske određenih trećih zainteresiranih osoba sklonije su, barem implicitno, drugom pristupu.
In particular, notably in its aforementioned study of 20 December 2013, Ryanair has provided information intended to show that the price of the AMS marketing services did not exceed what may be regarded as a market price for such services. Further to this argument, it has noted that airport operators cannot be distinguished from other types of AMS customer.
Osobito, Ryanair je, posebno u svojoj prethodno navedenoj studiji od 20. prosinca 2013., iznio elemente čija je svrha dokazati da cijene marketinških usluga društva AMS nisu veće od cijena koje se mogu smatrati tržišnim cijenama za takve usluge, dodajući tom argumentu da se upravitelji zračnih luka ne razlikuju od ostalih vrsta klijenata društva AMS.
The CCIPB has provided information leading in the same direction and has also noted that it is responsible for developing the economic attractiveness of the area falling within its competence.
Komora CCIPB dostavila je elemente u kojima je u istom smislu navedeno sljedeće:
The Commission notes in this respect, firstly, that this argument contradicts the theory that the decisions of the CCIPB on the measures in question are not imputable to the State.
Komisija u tom pogledu zamjećuje, s jedne strane, da je taj argument suprotan pretpostavci prema kojoj odluke komore CCIPB o dotičnim mjerama nisu pripisive državi.
If the CCIPB maintains that it signed these agreements to fulfil its local economic development task, then it must necessarily accept that its conduct is typically that of a local public authority.
Ako komora CCIPB smatra da je ugovore potpisala kako bi ispunila svoj zadatak razvoja lokalnog gospodarstva, svakako treba priznati da je njezino ponašanje svojstveno ponašanju lokalnog javnog tijela.
Secondly, the Commission considers that, out of the two solutions indicated above, the second one must be rejected because it inherently ignores the indissociable nature of the airport services agreements and corresponding marketing services agreements, as found previously.
S druge strane, Komisija smatra da je, između dva prethodno navedena rješenja, potrebno odbaciti drugo jer se njime zanemaruje da su ugovori o uslugama zračne luke i odgovarajući ugovori o marketinškim uslugama neodvojivi, kao što je to prethodno utvrđeno.
This approach would essentially mean considering that the CCIPB signed the marketing services agreements without any regard to the routes offered by Ryanair from the airport that it operates, and that it would have signed these agreements even in the absence of the routes in question and the corresponding airport services agreements.
Tim bi se pristupom ponovno polazilo od toga da je komora CCIPB ugovore o marketinškim uslugama potpisala neovisno o zračnim linijama društva Ryanair s polaskom iz Zračne luke kojom ona upravlja te da bi te ugovore potpisala čak i bez dotičnih zračnih linija i odgovarajućih ugovora o uslugama zračne luke.
For the reasons detailed in recitals 286 to 313, such an assumption is highly unlikely.
Iz razloga navedenih u uvodnim izjavama od 286. do 313., takva je pretpostavka vrlo malo vjerojatna.
Moreover, even if this second approach were used, it would not lead to the conclusion that the marketing services agreements do not confer an economic advantage on Ryanair and AMS.
Usto, čak i da je odabran taj drugi pristup, on ne bi doveo do zaključka da ugovori o marketinškim uslugama ne predstavljaju gospodarsku prednost u korist društava Ryanair i AMS.
In fact, as noted in recital 316, in order for purchases made by a public entity not to confer an economic advantage on the seller, it is not enough for them to have been made at a price equal to or below ‘market price’.
Naime, kao što je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 316., da nabave koje je proveo javni subjekt ne bi predstavljale gospodarsku prednost u korist prodavatelja, nije dovoljno da su provedene po cijeni koja je niža ili jednaka „tržišnoj cijeni”.
They must also meet an ‘actual need’ of the public purchaser.
Te bi nabave javnom kupcu trebale biti „stvarna potreba”.
It cannot be categorically ruled out that, in fulfilling its economic development mission for Pau and its region, the CCIPB may feel the need to resort to commercial providers in order to promote the area.
Nije moguće izričito isključiti da pri provedbi zadatka gospodarskog razvoja Paua i njegove regije komora CCIPB ima potrebu obratiti se pružateljima komercijalnih usluga u svrhu promidžbe tog podneblja.