natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, based on the grounds detailed above, the Commission considers that the benefits a prudent MEO would expect from a marketing service agreement would be strictly limited to the term of operation of the carrier at the airport, as set out in the airport service agreement.
Međutim, na temelju navedenih razloga, Komisija smatra da bi koristi koje bi razumni subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu očekivao od ugovora o marketinškim uslugama bile strogo ograničene na uvjete poslovanja prijevoznika u zračnoj luci, kako je propisano u ugovoru o uslugama zračne luke.
On this basis the Commission considers that any ‘terminal value’ aiming to reflect future benefits of the marketing services beyond the term of application of those agreements should be left out from of the analysis.
Na osnovu toga Komisija smatra da bi iz analize trebalo isključiti terminalnu vrijednost kojom se nastoje prikazati buduće koristi od marketinških usluga nakon razdoblja primjene tih ugovora.
The Commission also notes that Italy has not considered a ‘terminal value’ to account for benefits derived after expiry of the term of the agreements concluded by So.Ge.A.AL with Alitalia, Meridiana, Volare and Germanwings (see recital 528).
Komisija također napominje da Italija nije uzela u obzir terminalnu vrijednost kao odraz koristi izvedenih nakon isteka roka primjene ugovora koje je sklopilo društvo So.Ge.A.AL s društvima Alitalia, Meridiana, Volare i Germanwings (vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 528.).
Furthermore, the Commission finds that the approach taken by Italy in estimating the passenger numbers, and calculating on that basis the expected incremental aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues (without prejudice to the assessment in the previous recital concerning the ‘terminal value’), is sound.
Nadalje, Komisija smatra da je pristup Italije procjeni broja putnika i izračunu očekivanih dodatnih zrakoplovnih i nezrakoplovnih prihoda (ne dovodeći u pitanje procjenu terminalne vrijednosti iz prethodne izjave) utemeljen.
Although the Commission considers that the assumptions concerning the traffic projections should normally be exclusively based on the route frequencies and passenger targets stipulated in the ASAs and the load factor that could have been reasonably expected by So.Ge.A.AL at the time each ASA with Ryanair was concluded, given that at the time the 2006 and 2010 ASAs where signed So.Ge.A.AL expected Ryanair traffic to exceed the minimum targets set out in the agreements, the Commission agrees that So.Ge.A.AL's expectations at the time the agreements were signed, as set out in the business plans, represent the most accurate source for inferring So.Ge.A.AL's forecasts of Ryanair traffic at the time of signing the 2006 and 2010 ASAs.
Iako smatra da bi se pretpostavke u vezi s predviđanjima rasta prometa u načelu trebale temeljiti isključivo na učestalosti linija i očekivanom broju putnika predviđenom u ASA-ovima i na faktoru opterećenja koji bi društvo So.Ge.A.AL moglo razumno očekivati u trenutku sklapanja ASA-ova s društvom Ryanair, budući da je u trenutku potpisivanja ASA-ova iz 2006. i 2010. društvo So.Ge.A.AL očekivalo da će promet Ryanaira premašiti minimalne ciljeve utvrđene u ugovorima, Komisija se slaže da očekivanja društva So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku kada su potpisani ugovori, kako je propisano u poslovnim planovima, predstavljaju najtočniji izvor predviđanja društva So.Ge.A.AL o rastu prometa Ryanaira u trenutku potpisivanja ASA-ova iz 2006. i 2010.
The Commission in addition considers that So.Ge.A.AL's expectations of Ryanair's load factor, at the time of signing each of the agreements, as reasonable, since they were based on its experience and knowledge of the airline's business model.
Komisija smatra da su očekivanja koja društvo So.Ge.A.AL ima o faktoru opterećenja društva Ryanair, u trenutku potpisivanja ugovora, razumna jer su bila utemeljena na njegovom iskustvu i znanju o poslovnom modelu zračnog prijevoznika.
The Commission notes that, according to Italy, So.Ge.A.AL did not aim to recover the cost of the new passenger terminal from charges paid by Ryanair.
Komisija napominje da, prema Italiji, cilj društva So.Ge.A.AL nije bio pokriti troškove novog putničkog terminala iz pristojbi koje plaća društvo Ryanair.
In this respect, it indeed appears that it was the development of tourism in general which required the expansion of Alghero airport's terminal capacity in order to accommodate anticipated growth in traffic.
U tom se pogledu zaista čini da je da je za razvoj turizma općenito bilo potrebno širenje kapaciteta terminala zračne luke Alghero kako bi se mogao zadovoljiti predviđeni rast prometa.
Prior to the investments being undertaken at Alghero airport, despite significant potential, the development of the tourism sector was impeded by a lack of international connectivity.
Prije ulaganja u zračnu luku Alghero, unatoč znatnom potencijalu, razvoj sektora turizma onemogućen je zbog nedovoljne međunarodne povezanosti.
Alghero airport had reached capacity constraints in 2003 and 2004, and, therefore, investments were required to enable the airport to handle more passengers.
Zračna luka Alghero ostvarila je ograničenja kapaciteta 2003. i 2004. i stoga su bila potrebna ulaganja kako bi zračna luka mogla prihvatiti više putnika.
Indeed, none of the ASAs with Ryanair mentions any investments to be carried out by the airport manager.
Niti u jednom od ASA-ova s društvom Ryanair nisu spomenuta ulaganja koja će provoditi upravitelj zračne luke.
In this sense, the Commission notes that the investment in the expansion of the terminal was approved by CIPE in 1997 and therefore long before Ryanair started operations at Alghero airport.
U tom smislu Komisija napominje da je ulaganje u širenje terminala odobrio CIPE 1997. i stoga davno prije nego što je društvo Ryanair započelo s radom u zračnoj luci Alghero.
The application to ENAC for the comprehensive concession was part of So.Ge.A.AL's strategy with the objective to enhance the tourism sector by attracting low cost carriers.
Zahtjev ENAC-u za dodjelu opće koncesije bio je dio strategije društva So.Ge.A.AL u cilju jačanja sektora turizma privlačenjem niskotarifnih prijevoznika.
This strategy required the expansion of the terminal capacity to accommodate the anticipated traffic growth, a ‘comprehensive’ concession to ensure efficient and effective operations of the airport and contracts with low cost carriers.
Za provođenje te strategije bilo je potrebno širenje kapaciteta terminala kako bi se omogućio predviđeni rast prometa, „opća” koncesija za osiguranje učinkovitog i djelotvornog rada zračne luke i ugovori s niskotarifnim prijevoznicima.
On this basis, the Commission accepts that the investment costs connected to the new terminal are not imputable to any of the Ryanair agreements and therefore are not part of the incremental costs.
Na osnovu toga, Komisija prihvaća da se troškovi ulaganja povezani s novim terminalom ne mogu pripisati ugovorima društva Ryanair i stoga nisu dio dodatnih troškova.
The Commission further notes that expected incremental costs have been estimated by Italy following a bottom-up approach.
Komisija dalje napominje da je Italija procijenila predviđene dodatne troškove nakon pristupa odozdo prema gore.
A regression analysis has been followed to identify how operating costs vary as passenger numbers change, in order to estimate incremental costs which could have expected by So.Ge.A.AL at the time of signing the ASAs with Ryanair.
Provedena je regresijska analize kako bi se moglo utvrditi mijenjaju li se operativni troškovi s promjenama broja putnika kako bi se mogli procijeniti dodatni troškovi koje bi društvo So.Ge.A.AL moglo očekivati u trenutku potpisivanja ASA-ova s društvom Ryanair.
In the first step, a regression analysis has been carried out to identify the impact of a change in the airport's passenger numbers on the airport's operating costs.
U prvom je koraku provedena regresijska analiza kako bi se mogao utvrditi učinak promjene u broju putnika u zračnoj luci na operativne troškove zračne luke.
In the second step, the estimate of the additional operating costs as a result of the Ryanair agreements has been derived from the results of the first step combined with forecasts of the number of Ryanair passengers.
U drugom koraku je procjena dodatnih operativnih troškova kao rezultat ugovora s društvom Ryanair izvedena iz rezultata u prvom koraku u kombinaciji s predviđanjima broja putnika društva Ryanair.
For the 2006 and 2010 ASAs, the incremental cost data used by Italy in the regression pre-date the conclusion of the agreements which would have been available to So.Ge.A.AL at the date the airport manager entered the agreements in question.
U odnosu na ASA-ove iz 2006. i 2010., podaci o dodatnim troškovima koje je Italija upotrijebila u regresijskoj analizi prethode sklapanju ugovora koji bi bili dostupni društvu So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku kada je upravitelj zračne luke sklopio predmetne ugovore.
However, since costs data are only available for the period 1998 – 2010, if a similar approach was followed for the 2000, 2002 and 2003 agreements there would be only two, three and four data points available respectively to conduct the regression analysis.
Međutim, budući da su podaci o troškovima dostupni samo za razdoblje 1998. – 2010., da se sličan pristup slijedio za ugovore iz 2000, 2002. i 2003. postojale bi samo dvije, tri ili četiri točke za provođenje regresijske analize.
The Commission agrees that this would be insufficient to obtain robust results.
Komisija se slaže da to ne bi bilo dovoljno za dobivanje pouzdanih rezultata.
Absent sufficient ex ante data to allow to reconstruct the profitability analysis based on data which would have been available to So.Ge.A.AL at the time the agreements in question were signed, the Commission exceptionally (see recital 284) considers that for these agreements a regression based on outturn data for the whole period 1998-2010 is an acceptable proxy to what the reasonable expectations of a MEO would have been.
Bez dovoljno ex ante podataka na temelju kojih se može obnoviti rekonstruirati profitabilnosti na temelju podataka koji bi bili dostupni društvu So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku kada su potpisani predmetni ugovori, Komisija iznimno (vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 284.) smatra da je za te ugovore regresija utemeljena na podacima o rezultatima za cijelo razdoblje 1998. – 2010. prihvatljiva zamjena za ono što bi bila razumna očekivanja subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
Based on the assumptions detailed above, the Commission has reconstructed the ex ante profitability analysis of the agreements with Ryanair based on the incremental costs and revenues that could be reasonably expected by a market economy operator acting in lieu of So.Ge.A.AL at the time of the conclusion of each of the agreements under investigation in the present case.
Na temelju prethodno opisanih pretpostavki, Komisija je rekonstruirala ex ante analizu profitabilnosti ugovora s društvom Ryanair na temelju dodatnih troškova i prihoda koji bi se mogli razumno očekivati od subjekta u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji djeluje umjesto društva So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku sklapanja svakog od tih ugovora u predmetnom slučaju.
Indeed, it is clear from the various business plans drawn up by So.Ge.A.AL that the airport manager forecasted traffic growth based on its strategy to enhance the tourism sector by attracting international low-cost traffic, which was considered to produce a considerably higher passenger turnover than domestic activities [120].
Jasno je iz različitih poslovnih planova koje je izradilo društvo So.Ge.A.AL da je upravitelj zračne luke predvidio rast prometa na temelju strategije jačanja sektora turizma privlačenjem međunarodnog niskotarifnog prometa, za koji se smatra da ostvaruje znatno veći promet putnika od domaćih aktivnosti [120].
The table below presents the NPV of the cash flows expected from the Ryanair agreements based on the assumptions detailed above.
U Tablici u nastavku prikazani su NPV-ovi novčanih tokova koji se očekuju od ugovora s društvom Ryanair na temelju prethodno opisanih pretpostavki.
NPVs of the cash flows expected from the Ryanair agreements
Neto sadašnje vrijednosti novčanih tokova koji se očekuju od ugovora s društvom Ryanair
NPV over the duration of the agreement (million EUR) [121]
Neto sadašnja vrijednost tijekom trajanja ugovora (milijuni EUR) [121]
22 June 2000–21 June 2010
22. lipnja 2000. – 21. lipnja 2010.
[4–8]
[4 – 8]
1 January 2002–31 December 2012
1. siječnja 2002. – 31. prosinca 2012.
1 September 2003–1 September 2014
1. rujna 2003. – 1. rujna 2014.
1 January 2006–31 December 2010
1. siječnja 2006. – 31. prosinca 2010.
1 January 2010–31 December 2013
1. siječnja 2010. – 31. prosinca 2013.
[2–4]
[2 – 4]
As the expected discounted result is positive for each of the Ryanair agreements, the Commission is satisfied that each of the ASAs with Ryanair was expected to be profitable at the time they were concluded and therefore in concluding the agreements in question So.Ge.A.AL did not grant an economic advantage to Ryanair and therefore do not constitute State aid.
Budući da je očekivani diskontirani rezultat pozitivan za svaki od ugovora s društvom Ryanair, Komisija je primila dovoljno dokaza da se za svaki od ASA-ova s društvom Ryanair očekivalo da će biti profitabilan u trenutku kada je sklopljen i stoga društvo So.Ge.A.AL sklapanjem predmetnih ugovora nije dodijelilo gospodarsku prednost društvu Ryanair i stoga oni ne čine državnu potporu.
Agreements with carriers other than Ryanair
Ugovori s drugim zračnim prijevoznicima pored društva Ryanair
Agreements with Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana and Germanwings
Ugovori s društvima Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana i Germanwings
The Commission investigated So.Ge.A.AL's handling and marketing agreements with Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana and Germanwings, detailed in Table 12:
Komisija je istražila ugovore društva So.Ge.A.AL o zemaljskim uslugama i marketingu s društvima Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana i Germanwings, koji su opisani u Tablici 12.:
So.Ge.A.AL's agreements with Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana and Germanwings
Ugovori s društvima Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana i Germanwings
Handling agreement
Ugovor o zemaljskim uslugama
Marketing agreement
Ugovor o marketingu
2007–2009
2007. – 2009.
On the joint assessment of the handling and marketing agreements
i. O zajedničkoj ocjeni ugovora o zemaljskim uslugama i ugovora o marketingu
The Commission first notes that in each case, there are strong indications that those agreements were negotiated and concluded as part of a single transaction and are therefore to be evaluated as one single measure.
Komisija prvo napominje da u svakom slučaju postoje snažne naznake da se o ugovorima pregovaralo i da su sklopljeni kao dio jedne transakcije i stoga će se ocjenjivati kao jedna mjera.
the marketing agreement with Meridiana, which applied retroactively for the period June–October 2010 laid down in Article 1 — ‘Purpose of the Agreement’ that: ‘Meridiana undertakes to operate the abovementioned routes [Milan, Verona, Bari] according to the predefined operational programmes and therefore to operate a Communication and Marketing programme in agreement with So.Ge.A.AL’.
u ugovoru o marketingu s društvom Meridiana, koji se retroaktivno primjenjivao u razdoblju od lipnja – listopada 2010. propisano je u članku 1.
Furthermore, the agreement lays down the possibility for renewal of the agreement subject to Meridiana meeting certain passenger targets;
„Svrha ugovora” sljedeće: „Društvo Meridiana obvezuje se obavljati usluge prijevoza na navedenim linijama [Milano, Verona, Bari] u skladu s prethodno definiranim operativnim programima i stoga provoditi program za komunikacije i marketing u dogovoru s društvom So.Ge.A.AL.” Nadalje, u ugovoru je propisana mogućnost obnove ugovora ako društvo Meridiana zadovolji određene ciljeve u pogledu broja putnika;
under the marketing agreement, which applied retroactively for the period June–September 2010, Alitalia was to define a Communication and Marketing Programme having as object the promotion of the region, also by means of the start-up of the new routes (Barcelona, Paris and Brussels);
u skladu s ugovorom o marketingu, koji se retroaktivno primjenjivao u razdoblju od lipnja do rujna 2010., Alitalia je trebala definirati program za komunikacije i marketing čiji je cilj bio promidžba regije, između ostalog i pokretanjem novih linija (Barcelona, Pariz i Bruxelles);
the handling and marketing agreements with Volare were concluded on the same date.
ugovori o zemaljskim uslugama i marketingu s društvom Volare potpisani s su na isti datum.
The marketing agreement with Volare lays down: ‘This Supplemental Agreement represents a substantial part of the Standard Ground Handling Agreement. Therefore, it will remain in force until the Standard Ground Handling Agreement is terminated, for whichever reason, at which time this Supplemental Agreement and all rights and obligations provided hereby shall also terminate.’ The marketing agreement also sets passenger targets which the carrier undertakes to achieve;
U ugovoru o marketingu s društvom Volare propisano je sljedeće: „Ovaj dodatni ugovor predstavlja znatan dio standardnog ugovora o zemaljskim uslugama. Zato će ostati na snazi do raskida standardnog ugovora o zemaljskim uslugama, iz bilo kojeg razloga, i u tom se trenutku raskida i ovaj dodatni ugovor i prestaju sva prava i obveze utvrđene ovim ugovorom.” U ugovoru o marketingu također su utvrđeni ciljevi broja putnika koje prijevoznik preuzima obvezu ostvariti;
Therefore, the Commission considers that there is a clear link between the airport service agreements and the marketing agreements in that the latter were based on the conclusion of the airport services agreement and the services provided by the carriers.
Stoga Komisija smatra da postoji jasna veza između ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i ugovora o marketingu jer se potonji zasnivaju na sklapanju ugovora o uslugama zračne luke i uslugama koje pružaju prijevoznici.
On the approach followed to estimate incremental costs and revenues
O pristupu koji treba slijediti za ocjenjivanje dodatnih troškova i prihoda
No ex ante analysis of the profitability of the agreements with those airlines was carried out by So.Ge.A.AL prior to their conclusion.
Društvo So.Ge.A.AL. nije prije sklapanja tih ugovora sa zračnim prijevoznicima provelo nikakvu ex ante analizu njihove profitabilnosti.
As mentioned above, by letter dated 25 March 2014 Italy provided to the Commission a reconstructed ex ante analysis of the profitability of the agreements concluded with Air One/Alitalia, Meridiana, Volare, Germanwings based on the data which would have been available to a MEO acting in lieu of So.Ge.A.AL at the time the agreements in question were concluded as well as foreseeable developments at that time.
Kako je prethodno navedeno, Italija je dopisom od 25. ožujka 2014. dostavila Komisiji rekonstruiranu ex ante analizu profitabilnosti ugovora sklopljenih s društvima Air One/Alitalia, Meridiana, Volare, Germanwings utemeljenu na podacima koji bi bili dostupni subjektu u tržišnom gospodarstvu koji djeluje u ime društva So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku kada su sklopljeni predmetni ugovori i na promjenama koje su se u tom trenutku mogle predvidjeti.
According to Italy, the approach followed for the reconstructed analysis reflects the methodology that would have been adopted by a MEO and the results from the profitability assessment of those agreements would demonstrate that these agreements were also expected to be profitable for So.Ge.A.AL on an ex ante basis.
Italija tvrdi da se u pristupu provedbi rekonstruirane analize odražava metodologija koju bio prihvatio subjekt u tržišnom gospodarstvu i rezultati procjene profitabilnosti tih ugovora pokazali bi da se od tih ugovora također očekuje da će biti profitabilni za društvo So.Ge.A.AL. na ex ante osnovi.
The analysis is based on the approach set out in recitals 501 to 524.
Analiza se temelji na pristupu koji je utvrđen u uvodnim izjavama 501. do 524.
Incremental aeronautical revenues were derived by applying the relevant airport charges expected to be paid by each airline, combined with the traffic forecasts for the respective airline for all services other than ground handling.
Dodatni prihod od zrakoplovnih usluga dobiven je primjenom relevantnih pristojbi zračnih luka za koje se očekuje da će ih platiti svaki zračni prijevoznik, u kombinaciji s predviđanjima rasta prometa za zračnog prijevoznika za sve osim zemaljskih usluga.
Aeronautical revenues from ground handling are based on charges negotiated between So.Ge.A.AL and each airline.
Prihod od zrakoplovnih zemaljskih usluga temelji se na pristojbama koje je društvo So.Ge.A.AL ispregovaralo sa svakim zračnim prijevoznikom.
The traffic forecasts are based on either the airline's traffic levels in the year prior to signing the agreement or the traffic targets stipulated in the relevant agreements.
Predviđanja rasta prometa temelje se na razini prometa zračnog prijevoznika u godini prije potpisivanja ugovora ili na ciljevima rasta prometa predviđenima u relevantnim ugovorima.
Incremental non-aeronautical revenues are based on So.Ge.A.AL's expectations at the time the 2007 and 2010 agreements with the airlines were signed concerning non-aeronautical revenues of around EUR 5,00–6,00 per departing passenger as a result of the development of the new terminal (see also Table 9).
Dodatni prihod od nezrakoplovnih usluga temelji se na očekivanjima društva So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku kada su potpisani ugovori iz 2007. i 2010. sa zračnim prijevoznicima u pogledu prihoda od nezrakoplovnih usluga u iznosu od otprilike 5,00 – 6,00 EUR po odlaznom putniku kao rezultat razvoja novog terminala (vidjeti isto Tablicu 9.).
Incremental operating costs have been derived by taking into account the categories of incremental costs that So.Ge.A.AL expected at the time of signing each agreement with Air One/Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana and Germanwings and included: incremental staff costs, incremental handling costs, incremental costs of goods, services and materials, incremental concession costs, and the one-off marketing payments relating to new routes and success fees.
Dodatni operativni troškovi dobiveni su uzimanjem u obzir kategorija dodatnih troškova koje je društvo So.Ge.A.AL očekivalo u trenutku potpisivanja svakog ugovora s prijevoznicima Air One/Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana i Germanwings i uključivali su sljedeće: dodatne troškove osoblja, dodatne troškove zemaljskih usluga, dodatne troškove koncesija i jednokratna plaćanja za marketing za nove linije i naknade za uspjeh.
Regression analysis was carried out on passenger numbers and costs at the airport-level to identify the impact of a change in Alghero airport's passenger numbers on the airport's total costs.
Regresijska analiza provedena je na broju putnika i troškovima na razini zračne luke kako bi se utvrdio učinak promjene u broju putnika u zračnoj luci Alghero na ukupne troškove zračne luke.
For the purpose of the profitability analysis of the 2010 agreements with Alitalia and Meridiana, Italy has run the regression on cost data for the period pre-dating the signature of the agreements, i.e. 1998–2009, which would have been available to So.Ge.A.AL at the date it entered the agreements in question.
U svrhe analize profitabilnosti ugovora s prijevoznicima Alitalia i Meridiana iz 2010., Italija je provela regresijsku analizu podataka o troškovima u razdoblju prije potpisivanja ugovora, odnosno 1998. – 2009., koja bi bila dostupna društvo So.Ge.A.AL u trenutku kada je sklopilo predmetne ugovore.
However according to Italy the number of available data points prior to the signing of the 2007 agreements with Germanwings and Volare (1998–2006) is very low.
Međutim, Italija tvrdi da je broj dostupnih podatkovnih bodova prije potpisivanja ugovora iz 2007. s prijevoznicima Germanwings i Volare (1998. – 2006.) vrlo nizak.
The resulting estimates of incremental staff and materials costs are EUR 2,7 and EUR 9,3 per departing passenger respectively, which is considered as unusually high.
Rezultat procjena dodatnih troškova osoblja iznosi 2,7 EUR i materijala 9,3 EUR po odlaznom putniku, što se smatra neuobičajeno visokim.