natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the Commission considers that the requirements of point 43 of the R&R Guidelines have been fulfilled.
Stoga Komisija smatra da su ispunjeni zahtjevi iz točke 43. Smjernica za sanaciju i restrukturiranje.
Finally, point 72 of the R&R Guidelines, which provides that a company that has received rescue and restructuring aid in the past 10 years is not eligible for rescue or restructuring aid (the ‘one time, last time’ principle), must be respected.
Naposljetku, treba voditi računa o točki 72. Smjernica za sanaciju i restrukturiranje u kojoj je predviđeno da potporu za sanaciju i restrukturiranje ne može dobiti društvo koje je u posljednjih deset godina primilo potporu za sanaciju i restrukturiranje (načelo jednokratne dodjele).
Since measures 1, 4 and 5 do not entail state aid, they are not to be taken into account for the purposes of the ‘one time, last time’ principle.
Budući da 1., 4. i 5. mjera ne predstavljaju državnu potporu, one se ne uzimaju u obzir u svrhe načela jednokratne dodjele.
Moreover, the Latvian authorities have confirmed that airBaltic has not benefited from any rescue or restructuring aid in the past 10 years.
Osim toga, latvijska su nadležna tijela potvrdila da airBaltic nije imao koristi od potpore za sanaciju i restrukturiranje u posljednjih 10 godina.
The Commission therefore considers that the ‘one time, last time’ principle is respected.
Komisija stoga smatra da je poštovano načelo jednokratne dodjele.
CONCLUSION AS REGARDS MEASURES 2, 3 AND 6
ZAKLJUČAK O 2., 3. I 6. MJERI
In view of the above, the Commission finds that Latvia unlawfully implemented measures 2, 3 and 6 in favour of airBaltic, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
S obzirom na navedeno, Komisija smatra da je Latvija nezakonito provela 2., 3. i 6. mjeru u korist društva airBaltic, što predstavlja povredu članka 108. stavka 3. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
However, the Commission considers that the measures and the restructuring plan meet the conditions required by the R&R Guidelines.
Međutim, Komisija smatra da mjere i plan restrukturiranja ispunjuju uvjete propisane Smjernicama za sanaciju i restrukturiranje.
The Commission therefore considers the aid compatible with the internal market.
Komisija stoga smatra da je potpora spojiva s unutarnjim tržištem.
Finally, the Commission notes that Latvia agreed to have the present decision adopted and notified in English.
Naposljetku, Komisija napominje da je Latvija suglasna da se ova odluka donese i priopći na engleskom,
The first State loan of LVL 16 million which the Republic of Latvia granted to airBaltic in 2011, as well as the acquisition by the State of 0 %-coupon bonds from airBaltic in April 2010 and the payment of EUR 2,8 million by Latvijas Krājbanka to airBaltic in November 2011, do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Prvi državni zajam u iznosu od 16 milijuna LVL koji je Republika Latvija odobrila društvu airBaltic 2011., stjecanje bezkuponskih obveznica od društva airBaltic koje je u travnju 2010. ostvarila država i uplata banke Latvijas Krājbanka društvu airBaltic u iznosu od 2,8 milijuna EUR u studenome 2011. ne predstavljaju državnu potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
The second State loan of LVL 67 million and the capital increase of airBaltic, which the Republic of Latvia implemented in 2011, as well as the attribution to airBaltic of a claim of EUR 5 million, which the Republic of Latvia implemented in 2012, constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Drugi državni zajam u iznosu od 67 milijuna LVL i povećanje kapitala društva airBaltic koje je Republika Latvija provela 2011., te ustupanje društvu airBaltic potraživanja od 5 milijuna EUR koje je Republika Latvija izvršila 2012., predstavljaju potporu u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
Done at Brussels, 9 July 2014,
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 9. srpnja 2014.
OJ C 69, 8.3.2013, p. 40.
SL C 69, 8.3.2013., str. 40.
Exchange rate of EUR 1 = LVL 0,7063.
Tečaj 1 EUR = 0,7063 LVL.
Source: Riga International Airport Yearbook 2011, available at http://www.riga-airport.com/en/main/about-company/gada-gramata.
Izvor: Godišnjak međunarodne zračne luke Riga za 2011., dostupan na http://www.riga-airport.com/en/main/about-company/gada-gramata.
See http://bnn-news.com/airbaltic-shareholders-structure-11608.
Vidjeti http://bnn-news.com/airbaltic-shareholders-structure-11608.
The press reports some links between Taurus and a Russian entrepreneur Mr Vladimir Antonov.
Novinari su izvješćivali o nekim vezama između Taurusa i ruskog poduzetnika g. Vladimira Antonova.
The former main shareholder and chairman of the Lithuanian bank Snoras was Mr Vladimir Antonov.
Bivši glavni dioničar i predsjednik litavske banke Snoras bio je g. Vladimir Antonov.
The Central Bank of Lithuania explained that it needed to nationalise Snoras because of the failure to meet regulatory requirements, failure to provide requested information, and the poor condition of assets.
Središnja banka Litve objasnila je da mora nacionalizirati Snoras jer on nije ispunio regulatorne zahtjeve, nije dostavio tražene informacije i jer je njegova imovina u lošem stanju.
See http://en.rian.ru/ business/20120523/173624459.html and http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-19/antonov-says-he-invested-50-million-euros-in-latvia-s-airbaltic.html.
Vidjeti http://en.rian.ru/ business/20120523/173624459.html i http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-19/antonov-says-he-invested-50-million-euros-in-latvia-s-airbaltic.html.
See http://www.fktk.lv/en/publications/other_publications/2012-02-07_jsc_latvijas_krajbanka_c/.
Vidjeti http://www.fktk.lv/en/publications/other_publications/2012-02-07_jsc_latvijas_krajbanka_c/.
The Minister of Transport explained that the goal of the acquisition was to protect the depositors of Latvijas Krājbanka.
Ministar prometa objasnio je da je cilj stjecanja bio zaštititi ulagače Latvijas Krājbanke.
Apparently, BAS' financial problems threatened to prevent the State from investing in airBaltic's capital and thus the Government decided to act in the defence of its interests and take control of airBaltic.
Čini se da je postojala opasnost da zbog financijskih problema BAS-a država neće moći ulagati u kapital airBaltica i zato je Vlada odlučila zaštiti svoje interese i preuzeti kontrolu nad airBalticom.
See http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-01/latvia-buys-out-minority-shareholder-in-airbaltic-ministry-says.html and http://www.sam.gov.lv/?cat=8& art_id=2598.
Vidjeti http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-01/latvia-buys-out-minority-shareholder-in-airbaltic-ministry-says.html i http://www.sam.gov.lv/?cat=8& art_id=2598.
See http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/transport/?doc=54423.
Vidjeti http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/transport/?doc=54423.
The press also reports that BAS allegedly owed LVL 14 million to Latvijas Krājbanka (see for instance http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/transport/?doc=53861).
Novine su također izvijestile da je BAS navodno dugovao 14 milijuna LVL banci Latvijas Krājbanka (vidjeti na primjer http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/transport/?doc=53861).
According to Latvia, as of August 2013, BAS had not been declared bankrupt despite the attempts of several of its creditors.
Prema Latviji, od kolovoza 2013., BAS nije proglasio stečaj unatoč pokušajima nekoliko vjerovnika.
In addition, it seems that at least since 2010 the main shareholders of airBaltic — the Latvian State and BAS — remained in conflict: the press reports on numerous legal actions between the Latvian State and BAS (see for instance http://atwonline.com/airline-finance-data/news/airbaltic-files-bankruptcy-0921).
Osim toga, čini se da su barem od 2010. glavni dioničari društva airBaltic – latvijska država i BAS – bili u sukobu: novine su izvješćivale o brojnim sudskim postupcima između Latvije i BAS-a (vidjeti na primjer http://atwonline.com/airline-finance-data/news/airbaltic-files-bankruptcy-0921).
See http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/airbaltics-restructuring-plan-is-in-full-swing-but-competition-from-estonian-air-is-rising-74754.
Vidjeti http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/airbaltics-restructuring-plan-is-in-full-swing-but-competition-from-estonian-air-is-rising-74754.
See https://www.airbaltic.com/en/bottom_menu/press-room/press_releases/2011/airbaltic-files-for-legal-protection-airbaltic-to-continue-operations.
Vidjeti https://www.airbaltic.com/en/bottom_menu/press-room/press_releases/2011/airbaltic-files-for-legal-protection-airbaltic-to-continue-operations.
The Latvian Ministry of Transport placed an advertisement in the European and British editions of the Financial Times on 27 August 2012 inviting non-binding expressions of interest to participate in the sale of shares issued by airBaltic.
Latvijsko ministarstvo prometa objavilo je 27. kolovoza 2012. u europskom i britanskom izdanju novina Financial Times poziv na neobvezujući iskaz interesa za sudjelovanje u prodaji dionica airBaltica.
See http://prudentia.lv/upload_file/27082012-ABC%20ad%20EN.pdf.
Vidjeti http://prudentia.lv/upload_file/27082012-ABC%20ad%20EN.pdf.
The Latvian State apparently exercised this right on 8 June 2012 (see recital 23 above).
Latvijska država očito je ostvarila to pravo 8. lipnja 2012. (vidjeti prethodnu uvodnu izjavu 23.).
Contrary to what is stated in recital 80 of the opening decision, during the formal investigation procedure the Commission observed that BAS was not obliged under the Agreement to provide a convertible loan on pari passu terms alongside the second State loan.
Protivno onome što je navedenu u uvodnoj izjavi 80. odluke o pokretanju postupka, za vrijeme formalnog istražnog postupka, Komisija je primijetila da BAS prema Sporazumu nije bio obavezan osigurati konvertibilni zajam pod istim uvjetima kao i drugi državni zajam.
On 10 July 2012 airBaltic signed a letter of intent with Bombardier to acquire 10 CS300 aircraft and take purchase rights on a further 10 CS300 jetliners.
Društvo AirBaltic potpisalo je 10. srpnja 2012. pismo namjere s Bombardierom za kupnju 10 zrakoplova CS300 i preuzimanje prava kupnje za dodatnih 10 zrakoplova CS300.
Based on the list price of the CS300 airliner, a firm-order contract will be valued at approximately USD 764 million (EUR 621,74 million), and could increase to USD 1,57 billion (EUR 1,28 billion) should the purchase rights be converted to firm orders.
Na temelju prodajne cijene zrakoplova CS300 bit će potpisan ugovor o narudžbi u vrijednosti od otprilike 764 milijuna USD (621,74 milijuna EUR) koji bi se mogao povećati na 1,57 milijarde USD (1,28 milijardi EUR) ako se prava na kupnju pretvore u čvrste narudžbe.
See http://www.airbaltic.com/public/49780.html.
Vidjeti http://www.airbaltic.com/public/49780.html.
The first State loan of LVL 16 million and the second State loan of LVL 67 million (including the second tranche of LVL 25,4 million, which following the reShape plan was provided to the company in the second half of 2012).
Prvi državni zajam u iznosu od 16 milijuna LVL i drugi državni zajam u iznosu od 67 milijuna LVL (uključujući drugi obrok od 25,4 milijuna LVL, koji je nakon plana reShape isplaćen društvu u drugoj polovici 2012.).
The EUR […] million figure is claimed by Latvia but does not result from the Agreement.
Iznos od […] milijuna EUR je iznos koji navodi Latvija, ali nije naveden u Sporazumu.
Ryanair referred to Case C-405/11 P, Buczek Automotive, not yet published, at paras 55-57.
Ryanair je uputio na predmet C-405/11 P, Buczek Automotive, koji još nije objavljen, u stavcima 55. – 57.
See http://atwonline.com/airline-finance-data/news/airbaltic-files-bankruptcy-0921.
Vidjeti http://atwonline.com/airline-finance-data/news/airbaltic-files-bankruptcy-0921.
Source: airBaltic's annual report for 2011.
Izvor: godišnje izvješće airBaltica za 2011.
See for instance the press release of the Cabinet of Minister of Latvia of 7 September 2011 (http://www.mk.gov.lv/en/aktuali/zinas/2011/09/070911-cm-01/), where the Prime Minister at the time is reported as having stated that ‘it is essential to maintain airBaltic as the national air operator which creates substantial advantages for Latvia in the area of logistics, tourist attraction and as a significant employer, however, emphasizes the need to choose the solutions which are most favorable to the public interest’.
Vidjeti primjerice priopćenje za tisak Kabineta Ministra Latvije od 7. rujna 2011. (http://www.mk.gov.lv/en/aktuali/zinas/2011/09/070911-cm-01/), u kojem je tadašnji predsjednik Vlade rekao „od ključne je važnosti očuvati airBaltic kao nacionalnog zračnog prijevoznika koji Latviji donosi brojne prednosti u području logističke, turističke privlačnosti i kao važan poslodavac, međutim, upućuje da je potrebno odbrati rješenja koja su najpovoljnija za javni interes”.
Case T-565/08 Corsica Ferries v Commission, judgment of 11 September 2012, not yet reported, at para 122.
Predmet T-565/08 Corsica Ferries protiv Komisije, presuda od 11. rujna 2012., još nije prijavljena, u stavku 122.
See footnote 24.
Vidjeti bilješku 24.
The base rate for Latvia on 3 October 2011 was 2,2 %.
Osnovna stopa za Latviju na dan 3. listopada 2011. iznosila je 2,2 %.
To this figure a margin of 400 basis points should be added, considering the difficulties of airBaltic at the time and the significant level of collateralisation of the loan, resulting in a rate of 6,2 %.
Tom bi podatku trebalo dodati maržu od 400 osnovnih bodova uzimajući u obzir teškoće airBaltica u tom trenutku i značajnu razinu osiguranja zajma jamstvom, zbog čega je utvrđena stopa od 6,2 %.
The Commission nonetheless observes that the first State loan was capitalised on 29 December 2011 as part of measure 3.
Komisija svejedno primjećuje da je prvi državni zajam kapitaliziran 29. prosinca 2011. kao dio 3. mjere.
The assessment of measure 3 is presented in section 7.2.4 below.
Ocjena 3. mjere prikazana je u odjeljku 7.2.4. u nastavku.
The guarantee letter, dated 3 October 2011, states that the guarantee is void if the State ‘has used its rights according to […] Clause 7.4 [of the Agreement] and the State has become no less than 99,78 % shareholder of voting shares of [airBaltic]’.
U dopisu o jamstvu, od 3. listopada 2011., navedeno je da je jamstvo ništavo ako je država „iskoristila svoja prava u skladu s […] klauzulom 7.4 [Sporazuma] i postala je vlasnik najmanje 99,78 % dionica [airBaltica] s pravom glasa”.
Indeed, Latvia became 99,8 % shareholder of airBaltic on 30 November 2011.
Latvija je zaista postala vlasnik 99,8 % dionica društva airBaltic 30. studenoga 2011.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (Altmark), [2003] ECR I-7747, para 81.
Predmet C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH i Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (Altmark), [2003] ECR I-7747, stavak 81.
Commission Decision 2011/414/EU of 14 December 2010 on the State aid C 8/10 (ex N 21/09 and NN 15/10) implemented by Greece in favour of Varvaressos S.A. (OJ L 184, 14.7.2011, p. 9).
Odluka Komisije 2011/414/EU od 14. prosinca 2010. o državnim potporama C 8/10 (ex N 21/09 i NN 15/10) koje je provela Grčka u korist Varvaressos S.A. (SL L 184, 14.7.2011., str. 9.).
See Commission decision in case SA.30908 — CSA — Czech Airlines — Restructuring plan, at para. 107 and Commission decision in case SA.33015 — Air Malta plc. at para. 93.
Vidjeti odluku Komisije u predmetu SA.30908 – CSA – Czech Airlines – Plan restrukturiranja, u stavku 107., i odluku Komisije u predmetu SA.33015 – Air Malta plc., u stavku 93.
See as well Commission Decision 2010/137/EC of 28 August 2009 on State aid C 6/09 (ex N 663/08) — Austrian Airlines — Restructuring Plan (OJ L 59, 9.3.2010, p. 1) at para. 296 and Commission Decision 2012/542/EU of 21 March 2012 on the measure SA.31479 (2011/C) (ex 2011/N) which the United Kingdom plans to implement for Royal Mail Group (OJ L 279, 12.10.2012, p. 40), at para. 217.
Vidjeti također Odluku Komisije 2010/137/EZ od 28. kolovoza 2009. o državnim potporama C 6/09 (ex N 663/08) – Austria Austrian Airlines – Plan restrukturiranja (SL L 59, 9.3.2010., str. 1.), u stavku 296., i Odluku Komisije 2012/542/EU od 21. ožujka 2012. o mjeri SA.31479 (2011/C) (ex 2011/N) koju Ujedinjena Kraljevina planira provesti za Royal Mail Group (SL L 279, 12.10.2012., str. 40.), u stavku 217.
Respectively revenue per available seat kilometre (RASK) and cost of available seat kilometre (CASK).
Prihod od raspoloživih kapaciteta (RASK) i trošak raspoloživih kapaciteta (CASK).
See recital 194 below.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 194. u nastavku.
Namely the routes between […].
To su linije između […].
The Commission understands that the closures of these routes are pure compensatory measures since nothing suggests that they were closed as a necessary consequence of the reduction of the fleet.
Komisija shvaća da su zatvaranja tih linija čiste kompenzacijske mjere jer ništa ne upućuje na to da su zatvorene kao nužna posljedica smanjenja flote.
See Commission decision in case SA.30908 — CSA — Czech Airlines — Restructuring plan, at para.130 and 131.
Vidjeti odluku Komisije u predmetu SA.30908 – CSA – Czech Airlines – Plan restrukturiranja, stavke 130. i 131.
Fully coordinated airports are defined in Article 2(g) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports (OJ L 14, 22.1.1993, p. 1).
Potpuno koordinirane zračne luke definirane su u članku 2. točki (g) Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 95/93 od 18. siječnja 1993. o zajedničkim pravilima za dodjelu slotova u zračnim lukama Zajednice (SL L 14, 22.1.1993., str. 1.).
According to Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93, these airports experience, at least during certain periods, capacity constraints.
Prema članku 3. stavku 4. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 95/93, te zračne luke imaju problema s kapacitetom, barem u nekim razdobljima.
See Commission decision of 13 September 2006 in State aid case N 447/2006 — Latvia — Regional aid map 2007-2013.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 13. rujna 2006. u predmetu o državnim potporama N 447/2006 – Latvija – Zemljovid regionalnih potpora 2007. – 2013.
The total costs for transitioning the aircraft from an operator in default to meeting the delivery requirements for a new customer can easily run to up to […] % of the aircraft's book value.
Ukupni troškovi prijenosa zrakoplova sa subjekta koji nije ispunio uvjete isporuke na novog klijenta mogu jednostavno narasti do […] % knjigovodstvene vrijednosti zrakoplova.
See Czech Airlines decision, para.119 and 145.
Vidjeti odluku o Czech Airlines, stavci 119. i 145.
A meeting with the Latvian authorities and their advisers took place on 27 October 2011, after which the Latvian authorities submitted supplementary information by letter of 7 November 2011.
Sastanak s latvijskim nadležnim tijelima i njihovim savjetnicima održan je 27. listopada 2011. i nakon tog sastanka latvijska su nadležna tijela dostavila dodatne informacije dopisom od 7. studenoga 2011.
The Commission requested additional information by e-mails of 16 November 2011, 17 November 2011, 1 December 2011, and 9 December 2011, to which the Latvian authorities respectively replied by e-mails of 16 November 2011, 22 November 2011, 7 December 2011, and 13 December 2011.
Komisija je zatražila dodatne informacije porukama e-pošte od 16. studenoga 2011., 17. studenoga 2011., 1. prosinca 2011. i 9. prosinca 2011. na što su latvijska nadležna tijela odgovorila porukama e-pošte od 16. studenoga 2011., 22. studenoga 2011., 7. prosinca 2011. i 13. prosinca 2011.
By letter of 23 January 2012, the Commission sent the complaint for comments to Latvia, who replied on 13 March 2012.
Dopisom od 23. siječnja 2012. Komisija je pritužbu proslijedila Latviji, koja je odgovorila 13. ožujka 2012.
By letter of 14 May 2012, the Commission requested additional information from Latvia, provided on 16 July 2012.
Dopisom od 14. svibnja 2012. Komisija je od Latvije zatražila dodatne informacije i dobila ih je 16. srpnja 2012.
Latvia submitted comments on the opening decision by letter dated 23 January 2013.
Latvija je u dopisu od 23. siječnja 2013. dostavila primjedbe na odluku o pokretanju postupka.
The Commission requested information to Latvia by letter of 6 March 2013, replied to on 8 April 2013.
Komisija je od Latvije zatražila informacije dopisom od 6. ožujka 2013., te je dobila odgovor 8. travnja 2013.
In addition, a meeting with the Latvian authorities took place on 25 June 2013, after which Latvia submitted additional information on 14 August, 18 September, 9 and 25 October 2013.
Povrh toga, 25. lipnja 2013. održan je sastanak s latvijskim nadležnim tijelima nakon kojeg je Latvija dostavila dodatne informacije 14. kolovoza, 18. rujna, 9. i 25. listopada 2013.
Additional meetings with the Latvian authorities and their legal representatives took place on 22 October and 22 November 2013, as well as on 10 January 2014.
Dodatni sastanci s latvijskim nadležnim tijelima i njihovim pravnim zastupnicima održani su 22. listopada i 22. studenoga 2013. te 10. siječnja 2014.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] on 8 March 2013.
Komisijina odluka o pokretanju postupka objavljena je u Službenom listu Europske unije [3] 8. ožujka 2013.
Between 2003 and 2007, the annual average growth of passengers at Riga International Airport — including point-to-point and transfer passengers — reached 47 %, passing from approximately 700000 passengers in 2003 to 3,2 million in 2007.
Prosječni godišnji rast broja putnika u zračnoj luci Riga – uključujući putnike koji putuju od točke do točke i transferne putnike – dostigao je 47 % kada se broj putnika povećao s 700000 u 2003. na 3,2 milijuna u 2007.
The entry of low-cost carriers, especially Ryanair, contributed to the market growth as substantial new demand was created with the opening of new routes.
Ulazak niskotarifnih prijevoznika, posebno Ryanaira, pridonio je rastu tržišta jer se otvaranjem novih linija znatno povećala potražnja.
From information published in the press, it appears that BAS was set up as a private company wholly owned by Mr Bertolt Flick until December 2010, when 50 % of its shares were transferred to the Bahamas-registered Taurus Asset Management Fund Ltd (‘Taurus’). [5]
Na temelju informacija objavljenih u novinama, čini se da je BAS osnovan kao privatno trgovačko društvo u cijelosti u vlasništvu g. Bertolta Flicka do prosinca 2010. kada je 50 % njegovih dionica preneseno na fond za upravljanje imovinom Taurus Asset Management Fund Ltd („Taurus”) sa sjedištem na Bahamima [5].
Latvia granted the first State loan to airBaltic on 21 October 2011 (see recital 3 above).
Latvija je odobrila prvi državni zajam društvu airBaltic 21. listopada 2011. (vidjeti prethodnu uvodnu izjavu 3.).
BAS granted the BAS loan on 1 November 2011.
BAS je odobrio zajam BAS-a 1. studenoga 2011.
The first tranche of the second State loan of LVL 41.6 million (EUR 58,89 million) was immediately made available to airBaltic by agreement of 14 December 2011.
Prvi obrok drugog državnog zajma u iznosu od 41,6 milijuna LVL (58,89 milijuna EUR) odmah je stavljen na raspolaganje društvu airBaltic sporazumom od 14. prosinca 2011.
The second tranche of LVL 25,4 million (EUR 35,96 million) was made available to the company on 14 December 2012, i.e. after the Commission had adopted its opening decision.
Drugi obrok od 25,4 milijuna LVL (35,96 milijuna EUR) stavljen je na raspolaganje društvu 14. prosinca 2012., odnosno, nakon što je Komisija donijela svoju odluku o pokretanju postupka.