natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the party to the agreement does not use all or part of the framework capacity for a period of more than one month and has not informed the infrastructure manager of its intention not to use it at least one month in advance, the infrastructure manager shall reduce the capacity allocated to this party for the current timetable period, unless such failure to use the capacity is due to reasons beyond its control.
Ako stranka sporazuma ne upotrebljava dio ili cijeli okvirni kapacitet u razdoblju duljem od jednog mjeseca, a o tome nije najmanje jedan mjesec unaprijed obavijestila upravitelja infrastrukture niti tu odluku obrazložila okolnostima izvan svoje kontrole, tada upravitelj infrastrukture smanjuje kapacitet dodijeljen toj stranci u važećem razdoblju voznog reda.
The infrastructure manager may reduce the framework capacity allocated to this party for the time after the current timetable period.
Upravitelj infrastrukture može smanjiti okvirni kapacitet dodijeljen toj stranci za razdoblje nakon isteka važećeg razdoblja voznog reda.
The infrastructure manager shall offer to an applicant the framework capacity notwithstanding a possible right of the party to the agreement to request that capacity in accordance with the provisions on ad-hoc-requests referred to in Article 48(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Upravitelj infrastrukture mora podnositelju zahtjeva ponuditi okvirni kapacitet bez obzira na moguće pravo stranke sporazuma da zatraži taj kapacitet u skladu s odredbama o ad hoc zahtjevima u skladu s člankom 48. stavkom 1. Direktive 2012/34/EU.
When offering new framework capacity to an applicant, the infrastructure manager shall consider any failure to use framework capacity or to request train paths on the basis of a framework agreement and the reasons for it.
Kada upravitelj infrastrukture podnositelju zahtjeva ponudi novi okvirni kapacitet, u obzir mora uzeti sve slučajeve u kojima podnositelj zahtjeva nije uporabio dodijeljeni okvirni kapacitet ili nije zatražio trase vlakova na temelju okvirnog sporazuma, kao i obrazloženja takvih postupaka.
Cooperation in the allocation of framework capacity on more than one network
Suradnja u dodjeli okvirnog kapaciteta na više mreža
The infrastructure managers concerned with a service crossing more than one network of the rail system within the Union shall ensure as far as possible that:
Upravitelji infrastrukture nadležni za uslugu koja prelazi više mreža željezničkog sustava Unije moraju u najvećoj mogućoj mjeri osigurati sljedeće preduvjete:
if one or more framework agreements have been concluded for such a train service, the time frames requested match those agreed under the framework agreement or requested under it and the anticipated available capacity under each framework agreement matches with one another;
ako je za tu željezničku uslugu sklopljen jedan ili više okvirnih sporazuma, zatraženi vremenski okviri trebaju odgovarati okvirima dogovorenima ili zatraženima na temelju okvirnog sporazuma, a očekivani raspoloživi kapaciteti obuhvaćeni svakim okvirnim sporazumom trebaju međusobno odgovarati;
during the scheduling of the train paths, the train paths match with one another.
raspored trasa vlakova treba tako planirati da trase međusobno odgovaraju.
When a framework agreement is requested or is in operation for a train service crossing more than one network, upon request of the applicant, the infrastructure managers concerned shall designate one of the infrastructure managers concerned with a view to coordinating the requests for framework agreements or requests to modify framework agreements.
Ako je okvirni sporazum zatražen ili se primjenjuje na uslugu koja prelazi više mreža, na zahtjev podnositelja nadležni upravitelji infrastrukture imenuju jednog od upravitelja infrastrukture radi provedbe koordinacije zahtjeva za okvirne sporazume ili njihove izmjene.
If it is not possible to match the time frames and train paths, the infrastructure managers concerned shall coordinate to provide an appropriate alternative or justify in writing where no appropriate alternative can be provided.
Ako nije moguće uskladiti vremenske okvire i trase vlakova, nadležni upravitelji infrastrukture rade na pružanju odgovarajuće alternative ili u pisanom obliku obrazlažu nemogućnost pružanja alternative.
The applicant shall inform the infrastructure managers that received the request about any possible or actual request for another framework agreement concerning the same train service.
Podnositelj zahtjeva mora obavijestiti upravitelja infrastrukture koji je zaprimio zahtjev o svim mogućim ili stvarnim zahtjevima za drugi okvirni sporazum koji obuhvaća istu željezničku uslugu.
During the coordination, the infrastructure managers shall take into account capacity restrictions such as those resulting from maintenance works, as soon as they are known.
Upravitelji infrastrukture tijekom postupka koordinacije u obzir uzimaju ograničenja kapaciteta poput onih koja proizlaze iz radova na održavanju, čim su s njima upoznati.
For the purpose of implementing this Regulation, the infrastructure managers concerned shall cooperate in accordance with Article 40 of Directive 2012/34/EU, including when one or more of them do not propose framework agreements and when they associate for the purpose of capacity allocation.
Za potrebe provedbe ove Uredbe, nadležni upravitelji infrastrukture surađuju u skladu s člankom 40. Direktive 2012/34/EU, što obuhvaća slučajeve kada jedan ili više upravitelja infrastrukture ne predloži okvirne sporazume i kada suradnju ostvaruju u svrhu dodjele kapaciteta.
If one party requests penalties to be foreseen in the framework agreement in accordance with Article 42(4) of Directive 2012/34/EU, it shall not reject comparable penalties requested by the other party.
Ako jedna stranka u skladu s člankom 42. stavkom 4. Direktive 2012/34/EU zatraži da se u okvirnom sporazumu predvide sankcije, ne smije odbiti usporedive sankcije koje zatraži druga stranka.
The framework agreement shall not set penalties at a level exceeding the costs, direct losses and expenses (including loss of revenue) reasonably incurred or which can reasonably be expected to be incurred by the party indemnified as a consequence of the modification or termination of the agreement.
Okvirnim sporazumom ne smiju se odrediti sankcije u iznosu većem od izdataka, izravnih gubitaka i troškova (uključujući gubitak prihoda) razumno nastalih ili koji se mogu razumno očekivati da bi nastali za stranku obeštećenu zbog izmjene ili raskida sporazuma.
The party indemnified shall take reasonable steps to prevent or reduce the modification of the agreement, or to prevent its termination or to reduce its impact, and to recover any costs, losses and expenses or to otherwise mitigate the costs, direct losses and expenses (including loss of revenue).
Obeštećena stranka poduzima razumne mjere za sprječavanje ili ograničavanje izmjena sporazuma, ili za sprječavanje raskida sporazuma ili smanjenje učinka tog raskida te mjere za povrat izdataka, gubitaka i troškova ili druge mjere za smanjivanje tih izdataka, izravnih gubitaka i troškova (uključujući gubitak prihoda).
The infrastructure manager shall not request the payment of penalties in excess of the administrative costs for modifying or terminating the framework agreement in any of the following cases:
Upravitelj infrastrukture ne smije zahtijevati plaćanje sankcija čiji iznosi premašuju administrativne troškove izmjene ili raskida okvirnog sporazuma u bilo kojem od sljedećih slučajeva:
the cause for the modification or termination of the agreement was outside the applicant's control and the infrastructure manager had been informed thereof without delay;
uzrok je izmjene ili raskida sporazuma izvan kontrole podnositelja zahtjeva i upravitelj infrastrukture je o tome odmah obaviješten;
the applicant had a complementary request for framework capacity rejected without which the envisaged train service was not viable;
podnositelju zahtjeva odbijen je dodatni zahtjev za okvirni kapacitet bez kojeg predviđena željeznička usluga nije održiva;
the infrastructure manager could reallocate train paths and framework capacity in a way that the losses incurred by the modification or the termination of the framework agreement have already been recovered.
upravitelj infrastrukture može preraspodijeliti trase vlakova i okvirni kapacitet na način kojim bi se pokrili gubici nastali izmjenom ili raskidom okvirnog sporazuma.
The framework agreement shall not contain a provision waiving a penalty in the case where the applicant requests separately other capacity than the cancelled capacity.
Okvirni sporazum ne sadržava odredbu o odustajanju od naplate sankcija ako podnositelj zahtjeva u odvojenom postupku zatraži drugi kapacitet od otkazanoga kapaciteta.
Penalties shall not be requested if a modification involves only a marginal change in the agreed capacity.
Sankcije se ne smiju zatražiti ako izmjena obuhvaća samo neznatne promjene u dogovorenom kapacitetu.
Upon the request of the regulatory body, the infrastructure manager shall provide evidence that penalty payments have been made on time.
Na zahtjev regulatornog tijela upravitelj infrastrukture mora pružiti dokaze o pravodobnom isplaćivanju sankcija.
If an infrastructure manager does not propose framework agreements and does not have such agreements in operation, Articles 1 to 11 and Article 13 shall not apply to its network.
Ako upravitelj infrastrukture ne predloži okvirne sporazume i nema takvih sporazuma na snazi, članci od 1. do 11. i članak 13. ne primjenjuju se na njegove mreže.
A statement to this effect shall be published in the network statement.
U tu svrhu objavljuje se izjava u izvješću o mreži.
Member States may decide not to apply Articles 1 to 11 to framework agreements concluded before 15 March 2003.
Države članice mogu odlučiti ne primjenjivati članke od 1. do 11. na okvirne sporazume sklopljene prije 15. ožujka 2003.
Non-application of certain provisions
Neprimjenjivanje određenih odredaba
For framework agreements concluded before 28 April 2016, Member States may decide not to apply Articles 6(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 13 for a maximum period of five years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Za okvirne sporazume sklopljene prije 28. travnja 2016., države članice mogu odlučiti najdulje pet godina od datuma stupanja ove Uredbe na snagu ne primjenjivati članak 6. stavak 2. te članke 7., 8., 9., 10., 11. ili 13.
By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall not have the option referred to in the first sentence for amendments to framework agreements, which are agreed after 28 April 2016 and which would involve a increase of the allocated framework capacity or an extension of the duration of the framework agreement.
Odstupajući od prvog stavka, države članice nemaju pravo primijeniti mogućnost navedenu u prvoj rečenici za izmjene okvirnih sporazuma koje su dogovorene nakon 28. travnja 2016. i kojima je predviđeno povećavanje dodijeljenog okvirnog kapaciteta ili produljenje trajanja okvirnog sporazuma.
Done at Brussels, 7 April 2016.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 7. travnja 2016.
Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22.)
Uredba (EU) br. 913/2010 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. rujna 2010. o europskoj željezničkoj mreži za konkurentni prijevoz robe (SL L 276, 20.10.2010., str. 22.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/546
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/546
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/548
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/548
of 8 April 2016
оd 8. travnja 2016.
approving the basic substance diammonium phosphate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobravanju osnovne tvari diamonijev fosfat u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja i o izmjeni Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi Komisije (EU) br. 540/2011
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular Article 23(5) in conjunction with Article 13(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. listopada 2009. o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja i stavljanju izvan snage direktiva Vijeća 79/117/EEZ i 91/414/EEZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 23. stavak 5. u vezi s člankom 13. stavkom 2.,
In accordance with Article 23(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the Commission received on 29 September 2014 an application from the Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB) for the approval of diammonium phosphate as a basic substance.
U skladu s člankom 23. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Komisija je 29. rujna 2014. primila zahtjev od subjekta Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB) za odobrenje diamonijeva fosfata kao osnovne tvari.
That application was accompanied by the information required by the second subparagraph of Article 23(3).
Uz navedeni zahtjev priložene su tražene informacije iz članka 23. stavka 3. drugog podstavka.
The Authority presented to the Commission a Technical Report on the substance concerned on 6 October 2015 [2].
Agencija je 6. listopada 2015. Komisiji dostavila tehničko izvješće o predmetnoj tvari [2].
The Commission presented the review report [3] and a draft of this Regulation to the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed on 11 December 2015 and finalised them for the meeting of that Committee on 8 March 2016.
Komisija je Stalnom odboru za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje 11. prosinca 2015. predočila izvješće o pregledu [3] i nacrt ove Uredbe te pripremila njihove završne verzije za sastanak tog odbora održan 8. ožujka 2016.
Diammonium phosphate is authorised to be used in oenology by Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 [4].
Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 606/2009 [4] diamonijev fosfat odobren je za uporabu u enologiji.
The documentation provided by the applicant shows that diammonium phosphate is not predominantly used for plant protection purposes but nevertheless is useful in plant protection in a product consisting of the substance and water.
Dokumentacija koju je dostavio podnositelj zahtjeva pokazuje da je diamonijev fosfat koristan u zaštiti bilja u proizvodu koji se sastoji od te tvari i vode iako se ne upotrebljava pretežno za zaštitu bilja.
It has appeared from the examinations made that diammonium phosphate may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Provedena ispitivanja pokazala su da se za diamonijev fosfat može očekivati da načelno ispunjava zahtjeve utvrđene člankom 23. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009, posebno u pogledu uporaba koje su ispitane i iscrpno opisane u Komisijinu izvješću o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to approve diammonium phosphate as a basic substance.
Stoga je primjereno odobriti diamonijev fosfat kao osnovnu tvar.
In accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 thereof and in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge, it is, however, necessary to include certain conditions for the approval which are detailed in Annex I to this Regulation.
Međutim, u skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 u vezi s njezinim člankom 6. te s obzirom na postojeća znanstvena i tehnička saznanja, potrebno je uvrstiti određene uvjete za odobrenje koji su iscrpno opisani u Prilogu I. ovoj Uredbi.
The substance diammonium phosphate as specified in Annex I is approved as a basic substance subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Tvar diamonijev fosfat, kako je navedena u Prilogu I., odobrava se kao osnovna tvar u skladu s uvjetima utvrđenima u tom Prilogu.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Regulation.
Provedbena uredba (EU) br. 540/2011 mijenja se u skladu s Prilogom II. ovoj Uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 8 April 2016.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 8. travnja 2016.
EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-873.
EFSA, povezana publikacija 2015:EN-873.
34 pp.
34 str.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 of 10 July 2009 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards the categories of grapevine products, oenological practices and the applicable restrictions (OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 606/2009 od 10. srpnja 2009. o utvrđivanju određenih detaljnih pravila za provedbu Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 479/2008 u pogledu kategorija proizvoda od vinove loze, enoloških postupaka i primjenjivih ograničenja (SL L 193, 24.7.2009., str. 1.).
Diammonium phosphate
Diamonijev fosfat
CAS No: 7783-28-0
CAS br.: 7783-28-0
Diammonium hydrogen phosphate
Diamonijev hidrogenfosfat
Oenological grade
Enološki stupanj
29 April 2016
29. travnja 2016.
Diammonium phosphate shall be used in accordance with the specific conditions included in the conclusions of the review report on diammonium phosphate (SANTE/12351/2015) and in particular Appendices I and II thereto.
Diamonijev fosfat mora se upotrebljavati u skladu s posebnim uvjetima navedenima u zaključcima izvješća o pregledu za diamonijev fosfat (SANTE/12351/2015), a posebno njegovim dodacima I. i II..
In Part C of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, the following entry is added:
U dijelu C Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi (EZ) br. 540/2011 dodaje se sljedeći unos:
Diammonium phosphate shall be used in accordance with the specific conditions included in the conclusions of the review report on diammonium phosphate (SANTE/12351/2015) and in particular Appendices I and II thereto.’
Diamonijev fosfat mora se upotrebljavati u skladu s posebnim uvjetima navedenima u zaključcima izvješća o pregledu za diamonijev fosfat (SANTE/12351/2015), a posebno njegovim dodacima I. i II.”
Technical report on the outcome of the consultation with Member States and EFSA on the basic substance application for diammonium phosphate for use in plant protection as a non-lethal food attractant for fruit flies.
Tehničko izvješće o rezultatima savjetovanja s državama članicama i EFSA-om o zahtjevu za odobrenje diamonijeva fosfata kao osnovne tvari za primjenu u sredstvima za zaštitu bilja kao nesmrtonosni hranidbeni atraktant za voćne mušice.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/549
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/549
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances bentazone, cyhalofop butyl, diquat, famoxadone, flumioxazine, DPX KE 459 (flupyrsulfuron-methyl), metalaxyl-M, picolinafen, prosulfuron, pymetrozine, thiabendazole and thifensulfuron-methyl
o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 540/2011 u pogledu produljenja roka odobrenja aktivnih tvari: bentazon, cihalofop butil, dikvat, famoksadon, flumioksazin, DPX KE 459 (flupirsulfuron-metil), metalaksil-M, pikolinafen, prosulfuron, pimetrozin, tiabendazol i tifensulfuron-metil
The approval periods of the active substances bentazone, cyhalofop butyl, diquat, famoxadone, flumioxazine, DPX KE 459 (flupyrsulfuron-methyl), metalaxyl-M, picolinafen, prosulfuron, pymetrozine, thiabendazole and thifensulfuron-methyl were extended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1885 [3].
Rokovi odobrenja aktivnih tvari bentazon, cihalofop butil, dikvat, famoksadon, flumioksazin, DPX KE 459 (flupirsulfuron-metil), metalaksil-M, pikolinafen, prosulfuron, pimetrozin, tiabendazol i tifensulfuron-metil produljeni su Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2015/1885 [3].
Due to the fact that the assessment of the substances has been delayed for reasons beyond the control of the applicants, the approvals of those active substances are likely to expire before a decision has been taken on their renewal.
Zbog činjenice da je ocjenjivanje tvari odgođeno iz razloga koji su izvan kontrole podnositelja zahtjeva, odobrenja tih aktivnih tvari vjerojatno će isteći prije donošenja odluke o njihovu produljenju.
It is therefore necessary to extend their approval periods.
Stoga je potrebno produljiti rokove tih odobrenja.
In view of the aim of the first paragraph of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as regards cases where the Commission will adopt a Regulation providing that the approval of an active substance referred to in the Annex to this Regulation is not renewed because the approval criteria are not satisfied, the Commission will set the expiry date at the same date as before this Regulation or at the date of the entry into force of the Regulation providing that the approval of the active substance is not renewed, whichever date is later.
S obzirom na cilj članka 17. stavka 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009, u slučajevima u kojima će Komisija donijeti uredbu kojom se odobrenje aktivne tvari iz Priloga ovoj Uredbi ne produljuje jer nisu ispunjena mjerila za odobrenje, Komisija će kao datum prestanka roka trajanja odrediti isti datum koji je vrijedio prije donošenja ove Uredbe ili datum stupanja na snagu uredbe kojom se predviđa da se odobrenje aktivne tvari ne produljuje, ovisno o tome koji je datum kasniji.
As regards cases where the Commission will adopt a Regulation providing for the renewal of an active substance referred to in the Annex to this Regulation, the Commission will endeavour to set, as appropriate under the circumstances, the earliest possible application date.
U slučajevima u kojima Komisija donese uredbu o produljenju aktivne tvari iz Priloga ovoj Uredbi, Komisija će nastojati, u skladu s okolnostima, odrediti najraniji mogući datum primjene.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1885 of 20 October 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances 2,4-D, acibenzolar-s-methyl, amitrole, bentazone, cyhalofop butyl, diquat, esfenvalerate, famoxadone, flumioxazine, DPX KE 459 (flupyrsulfuron-methyl), glyphosate, iprovalicarb, isoproturon, lambda-cyhalothrin, metalaxyl-M, metsulfuron methyl, picolinafen, prosulfuron, pymetrozine, pyraflufen-ethyl, thiabendazole, thifensulfuron-methyl and triasulfuron (OJ L 276, 21.10.2015, p. 48).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1885 od 20. listopada 2015. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 540/2011 u pogledu produljenja rokova odobrenja aktivnih tvari: 2,4-D, acibenzolar-s-metil, amitrol, bentazon, cihalofop butil, dikvat, esfenvalerat, famoksadon, flumioksazin, DPX KE 459 (flupirsulfuron-metil), glifosat, iprovalikarb, izoproturon, lambda-cihalotrin, metalaksil-M, metsulfuron-metil, pikolinafen, prosulfuron, pimetrozin, piraflufen-etil, tiabendazol, tifensulfuron-metil i triasulfuron (SL L 276, 21.10.2015., str. 48.).
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 11, Bentazone, the date of ‘30 June 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2017’;
U šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 11., bentazon, datum „30. lipnja 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „30. lipnja 2017.”
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 15, Diquat, the date of ‘30 June 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2017’;
U šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 15., dikvat, datum „30. lipnja 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „30. lipnja 2017.”
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 17, Thiabendazole, the date of ‘30 June 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2017’;
U šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 17., tiabendazol, datum „30. lipnja 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „30. lipnja 2017.”
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 19, DPX KE 459 (flupyrsulfuron-methyl), the date of ‘30 June 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2017’;
U šestom stupcu, prestanak odobrenja, u retku 19., DPX KE 459 (flupirsulfuron-metil), datum „30. lipnja 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „30. lipnja 2017.”