natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Annex VI, in the table in the Appendix to Model A, Item 1 shall be deleted.
U Prilogu VI. u tablici u Dodatku modelu A briše se stavka 1.
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 1 shall be deleted;
briše se stavka 1. u tablici u Dodatku 1.;
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 2 shall be deleted;
briše se stavka 1. u tablici u Dodatku 2.;
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 3 shall be deleted;
briše se stavka 1. u tablici u Dodatku 3.;
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 4 shall be deleted;
briše se stavka 1. u tablici u Dodatku 4.;
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 5 shall be deleted.
briše se stavka 1. u tablici u Dodatku 5.
Article 4(1) and (2)
Članak 2. Članak 4. stavci 1. i 2.
Article 4(3) and (4)
Članak 4. stavci 3. i 4.
Annex I, point 1
Prilog I. točka 1.
Annex I, point 3
Prilog I. točka 3.
Annex I, point 2
Prilog I., Dodatak 2. Prilog I. točka 2.
Annex I, point 4
Prilog I. točka 4.
Annex I, point 5
Prilog I. točka 5.
Annex I, point 6
Prilog I. točka 6.
Annex I, Appendix 1
Prilog I., Dodatak 1.
Annex I, Appendix 2
Prilog I., Dodatak 2.
Annex IX, points 1, 2, 3 and 4
Prilog II., točke 1., 2., 3. i 4.
Annex II, points 5 and 6
Prilog IX., točke 1., 2., 3. i 4. Prilog VI., točke 5. i 6.
Annex IX, points 7 and 8
Prilog IX., točke 7. i 8.
Annex II, Appendix 1
Prilog II., Dodatak 1.
Annex IX, Appendix 1
Prilog IX., Dodatak 1
Annex II, Appendix 2
Prilog II., Dodatak 2.
Annex IX, Appendix 2
Prilog IX., Dodatak 2.
Annex II, Appendix 3
Prilog II., Dodatak 3.
Annex IX, Appendix 3
Prilog IX., Dodatak 3.
The new method should be based on the test method published by the UNECE Working Party on Noise (GRB) in 2007 which incorporated a 2007 version of the standard ISO 362.
Novi bi se način trebao temeljiti na načinu ispitivanja koji je 2007. objavila UNECE-ova radna skupina za buku (GRB) i koji uključuje normu ISO 362 iz 2007.
The results of monitoring of both the old and the new test methods were submitted to the Commission.
Rezultati proučavanja starog i novog načina ispitivanja dostavljeni su Komisiji.
The Sixth Community Environment Action Programme [11] set out the framework for environmental policy-making in the Union for the period 2002-2012.
U Šestom akcijskom programu o okolišu [11] utvrđen je okvir za oblikovanje politike u području okoliša u Uniji za razdoblje 2002.–2012.
That programme called for actions in the field of noise pollution to substantially reduce the number of people regularly affected by long-term average levels of noise, particularly from traffic.
Taj program zatražio je djelovanje u području onečišćenja bukom kako bi se značajno smanjio broj osoba koje su redovito izložene dugotrajnim prosječnim razinama buke, osobito iz prometa.
The Commission shall carry out and publish a detailed study on sound level limits by 1 July 2021.
Komisija je dužna provesti i objaviti detaljnu studiju o graničnim vrijednostima razine buke najkasnije do 1. srpnja 2021.
The study shall be based on vehicles meeting the latest regulatory requirements.
Studija se mora temeljiti na vozilima koja zadovoljavaju najnovije regulatorne zahtjeve.
In selecting the vehicle representative of the type, the technical service responsible for the tests shall do so to the satisfaction of the approval authority.
Pri odabiru vozila reprezentativnog za tip, tehnička služba čini to tako da zadovolji tijelo za homologaciju.
Virtual testing methods may be used to aid decision-making during the selection process.
Kao pomoć pri donošenju odluke u postupku odabira mogu se koristiti metode virtualnog ispitivanja.
k = (a wot ref – a wot (i+1))/(a wot (i) – a wot (i+1))
k = (a wot ref – a wot (i+1))/(a wot(i) – a wot (i+1));
Lcrs rep = Lcrs(i+1) + k * (Lcrs (i) – Lcrs (i+1))
Lcrs rep = Lcrs(i+1) + k * (Lcrs(i) – Lcrs (i+1))
≤ 120 kW/1000 kg
≤ 120 kW/1000kg
andn
i;n
LASEP_k,j = Lanchor_k + (Slopek – Y) * (nBB_k,j – nanchor,k)/1000
LASEP_k,j = Lučvršćenje_k + (Nagibk - Y) * (nBB_k,j - nučvršćenje,k)/1000
LASEP_k,j = Lanchor_k + (Slopek + Y) * (nBB_k,j – nanchor,k)/1000
LASEP_k,j = Lučvršćenje_k + (Nagibk + Y) * (nBB_k,j - nučvršćenje,k)/1000
Lref = Lanchor_K + SlopeK * (nref_K – nanchor_K)/1000
Lref = Lučvršćenje_K + Nagibk * (nref_K - nučvršćenje_K)/1000
Lurban = Lwot rep – kP * (Lwot rep – Lcrs rep)
Lurban = Lwot rep – kP * (Lwot rep– Lcrs rep)
kP ASEP = 1 – (aurban/awot test ASEP)
kP ASEP = 1 - (aurban/awot test ASEP)
Lurban normalized = Lurban measured ASEP – Lurban
Lurban normaliziran = Lurban izmjeren ASEP – Lurban
n anchor,i
L učvršćenje,i
v anchor,i
n učvršćenje,i
n anchor,i+1
L učvršćenje,i+1
v anchor,i+1
n učvršćenje,i+1
TESTING PROCEDURE The test site and measuring instruments shall be those described in Annex II.
POSTUPAK ISPITIVANJA
This Annex describes a measuring method to evaluate compliance of the vehicle with the additional sound emission provisions (ASEP) set out in Article 7. It is not mandatory to perform actual tests when applying for EU type-approval.
Ovaj Prilog opisuje mjernu metodu za procjenu usklađenosti vozila s dodatnim odredbama za emisiju zvuka (ASEP) utvrđenima u članku 7.
Determination of the anchor point for each gear ratio For measurements in gear i and lower, the anchor point consists of the maximum sound level Lwoti, the reported engine speed nwoti and vehicle speed vwoti at BB' of gear ratio i of the acceleration test in Annex II. L anchor,i
Utvrđivanje točke učvršćenja za svaki prijenosni omjer
For measurements in gear i+1 the anchor point consists of the maximum sound level Lwoti+1, the reported engine speed nwoti+1 and vehicle speed vwoti+1 at BB' of gear ratio i+1 of the acceleration test in Annex II. L anchor,i+1
vBB,woti,Prilog II.
Lurban measured ASEP =
Lurban izmjeren ASEP =
When the replacement silencing system, or components thereof, is mounted on the vehicle described in point 1.3.3, the sound levels obtained shall satisfy one of the following conditions: (i) the value measured (rounded to the nearest integer) shall not exceed by more than 2 dB(A) the type-approval value obtained under this Regulation with the type of vehicle concerned;
Ako se zamjenski sustav za prigušivanje, ili njegovi sastavni dijelovi, ugrađuju na vozilo opisano u točki 1.3.3., postignute razine zvuka moraju ispunjavati jedan od sljedećih uvjeta:
Where the replacement silencing system, or components thereof, is a system or components with variable geometry, in the application for type-approval the manufacturer shall provide a statement in conformity with the Appendix to Annex VII that the silencing system type to be approved complies with the requirements of point 5.2.3 of this Annex. The approval authority may require any relevant test to verify the compliance of the silencing system type to the additional sound emission provisions.
Za zamjenske sustave za prigušivanje namijenjene za tipove vozila homologirane u skladu s Direktivom 70/157/EEZ zahtjevi iz Priloga VII. kao ni specifikacije iz točaka od 5.2.3.1. do 5.2.3.3. ovog Priloga ne primjenjuju se.
Article 1 —
Članak 1.
Annex I, point 5 Annex I, Appendix 1
Prilog I. točka 5.
Annex III Annex II, points 1, 2, 3 and 4
Prilog III.
Regulation (EU) No 542/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) br. 542/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
amending Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 as regards the rules to be applied with respect to the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice
o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 u pogledu pravila koja se primjenjuju na Jedinstveni sud za patente i Sud Beneluksa
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a), (c) and (e) of Article 81(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 81. stavak 2. točke (a), (c) i (e),
On 19 February 2013, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland signed the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court [3] (the ‘UPC Agreement’).
Dana 19. veljače 2013. Kraljevina Belgija, Republika Bugarska, Češka Republika, Kraljevina Danska, Savezna Republika Njemačka, Republika Estonija, Irska, Helenska Republika, Francuska Republika, Talijanska Republika, Republika Cipar, Republika Latvija, Republika Litva, Veliko Vojvodstvo Luksemburg, Mađarska, Republika Malta, Kraljevina Nizozemska, Republika Austrija, Portugalska Republika, Rumunjska, Republika Slovenija, Slovačka Republika, Republika Finska, Kraljevina Švedska i Ujedinjena Kraljevina Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske potpisale su Sporazum o Jedinstvenom sudu za patente („Sporazum o UPC-u”) [3].
The UPC Agreement provides for its entry into force not prior to the first day of the fourth month after the date of entry into force of the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] concerning the relationship of that Regulation with the UPC Agreement.
Sporazumom o UPC-u predviđa se da on ne stupa na snagu prije prvog dana četvrtog mjeseca od dana stupanja na snagu izmjena Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4] u vezi s odnosom te Uredbe sa Sporazumom o UPC-u.
On 15 October 2012, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, parties to the Treaty of 31 March 1965 concerning the establishment and statute of a Benelux Court of Justice (the ‘Benelux Court of Justice Treaty’), signed a Protocol amending that Treaty.
Dana 15. listopada 2012. Kraljevina Belgija, Veliko Vojvodstvo Luksemburg i Kraljevina Nizozemska, stranke Ugovora od 31.ožujka 1965. o uspostavi i statutu Suda Beneluksa („Ugovor o Sudu Beneluksa”), potpisale su Protokol o izmjeni tog Ugovora.
That Protocol made it possible to transfer jurisdiction to the Benelux Court of Justice in specific matters falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Tim Protokolom omogućeno je prenošenje ovlasti Sudu Beneluksa u određenim stvarima iz okvira Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012.
It is necessary to regulate the relationship of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 with the UPC Agreement and with the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty by way of amendments to that Regulation.
Potrebno je regulirati vezu Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 sa Sporazumom o UPC-u i sa Ugovorom o Sudu Beneluksa putem izmjene te Uredbe.
The Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice should be deemed to be courts within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 in order to ensure legal certainty and predictability for defendants who could be sued in those two Courts at a location situated in a Member State other than the one designated by the rules of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Jedinstveni sud za patente i Sud Beneluksa trebali bi se smatrati sudovima u smislu Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost i predvidivost za tuženike koji bi mogli biti tuženi pred ta dva suda na mjestu koje se nalazi u državi članici koja nije država članica određena pravilima Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012.
The amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 provided for in this Regulation with regard to the Unified Patent Court are intended to establish the international jurisdiction of that Court and do not affect the internal allocation of proceedings among the divisions of that Court nor the arrangements laid down in the UPC Agreement concerning the exercise of jurisdiction, including exclusive jurisdiction, during the transitional period provided for in that Agreement.
Izmjene Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 predviđene ovom Uredbom u vezi s Jedinstvenim sudom za patente namijenjene su uspostavi međunarodne nadležnosti tog suda i ne utječu na unutarnju raspodjelu postupaka među odjelima tog suda niti na aranžmane iz Sporazuma o UPC-u u vezi s izvršavanjem nadležnosti, uključujući isključivu nadležnost, u prijelaznom razdoblju predviđenom u tom Sporazumu.
As courts common to several Member States, the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice cannot, unlike a court of one Member State, exercise jurisdiction on the basis of national law with respect to defendants not domiciled in a Member State.
Kao sudovi koji su zajednički za više država članica, Jedinstveni sud za patente i Sud Beneluksa ne mogu, za razliku od suda jedne države članice, izvršavati nadležnost na temelju nacionalnog prava prema tuženicima koji nemaju domicil u državi članici.
To allow those two Courts to exercise jurisdiction with respect to such defendants, the rules of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 should therefore, with regard to matters falling within the jurisdiction of, respectively, the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice, also apply to defendants domiciled in third States.
Kako bi se omogućilo tim dvama sudovima da izvršavaju nadležnost u odnosu na takve tuženike, pravila Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 u vezi sa stvarima koje potpadaju pod nadležnost Jedinstvenog suda za patente odnosno Suda Beneluksa trebala bi se primjenjivati i na tuženike koji imaju domicil u trećim državama.
The existing rules of jurisdiction of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 ensure a close connection between proceedings to which that Regulation applies and the territory of the Member States.
Postojeća pravila o nadležnosti Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 osiguravaju usku povezanost između postupaka na koje se ta Uredba odnosi i državnog područja država članica.
It is therefore appropriate to extend those rules to proceedings against all defendants regardless of their domicile.
Stoga je primjereno proširiti navedena pravila na postupke protiv svih tuženika, bez obzira na njihov domicil.
When applying the rules of jurisdiction of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice (hereinafter individually referred to as a ‘common court’) should apply only those rules which are appropriate for the subject-matter for which jurisdiction has been conferred on them.
Pri primjeni pravila nadležnosti Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012, Jedinstveni sud za patente i Sud Beneluksa (dalje u tekstu pojedinačno kao „zajednički sud”) trebali bi primjenjivati samo ona pravila koja su primjerena predmetima za koje im je dodijeljena nadležnost.
A common court should be able to hear disputes involving defendants from third States on the basis of a subsidiary rule of jurisdiction in proceedings relating to an infringement of a European patent giving rise to damage both inside and outside the Union.
Zajednički sud trebao bi moći rješavati sporove koji uključuju tuženike iz trećih država na temelju supsidijarnog pravila nadležnosti u postupcima u vezi s povredom europskog patenta koji je doveo do štete unutar i izvan Unije.
Such subsidiary jurisdiction should be exercised where property belonging to the defendant is located in any Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court and the dispute in question has a sufficient connection with any such Member State, for example because the claimant is domiciled there or the evidence relating to the dispute is available there.
Takvu supsidijarnu nadležnost trebalo bi izvršavati ako se imovina koja pripada tuženiku nalazi u bilo kojoj državi članici stranci instrumenta o uspostavi zajedničkog suda, a dotični spor dovoljno je povezan s tom bilo kojom državom članicom jer, na primjer, jer tužitelj ondje ima domicil ili se ondje nalaze dokazi povezani s tim sporom.
In establishing its jurisdiction, the common court should have regard to the value of the property in question, which should not be insignificant and which should be such as to make it possible to enforce the judgment, at least in part, in the Member States parties to the instrument establishing the common court.
Pri uspostavi svoje nadležnosti, zajednički sud trebao bi uzeti u obzir vrijednost dotične imovine koja ne bi trebala biti beznačajna i koja bi trebala omogućiti barem djelomično izvršenje sudske presude u državama članicama strankama instrumenta o uspostavi zajedničkog suda.
The rules of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on lis pendens and related actions, aimed at preventing parallel proceedings and irreconcilable judgments, should apply when proceedings are brought in a common court and in a court of a Member State in which the UPC Agreement or, as the case may be, the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty does not apply.
Pravila Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 u vezi s litispendencijom i povezanim postupcima, kojima je cilj spriječiti paralelne postupke i proturječne odluke, trebala bi se primjenjivati u postupcima pred zajedničkim sudom primjenjuje i pred sudom države članice u kojoj se Sporazum o UPC-u ili, ovisno o slučaju, Ugovor o Sudu Beneluksa ne primjenjuju.
Judgments given by the Unified Patent Court or by the Benelux Court of Justice should be recognised and enforced in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 in a Member State not party to, as the case may be, the UPC Agreement or the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty.
Sudske presude koje donosi Jedinstveni sud za patente ili Sud Beneluksa trebale bi se priznavati i izvršavati u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 1215/2012 u državi članici koja nije stranka, ovisno o slučaju, Sporazuma o UPC-u ili Ugovora o Sudu Beneluksa.
Judgments given by the courts of a Member State not party to, as the case may be, the UPC Agreement or the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty should be recognised and enforced in another Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Sudske odluke koje donose sudovi države članice koja nije stranka, ovisno o slučaju, Sporazuma o UPC-u ili Ugovora o Sudu Beneluksa trebale bi se priznavati i izvršavati u drugoj državi članici u skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 1215/2012.
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbu (EU) br. 1215/2012 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
S obzirom na to da cilj ove Uredbe ne mogu dostatno ostvariti države članice, nego se zbog svojeg opsega i učinaka, on na bolji način može ostvariti na razini Unije, Unija može donijeti mjere u skladu s načelom supsidijarnosti, utvrđenim u članku 5.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Ugovora o Europskoj uniji (UEU). U skladu s načelom proporcionalnosti utvrđenim u tom članku, ova Uredba ne prelazi ono što je potrebno za ostvarivanje tog cilja.
In accordance with Article 3 and Article 4a(1) of the Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), those Member States have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
U skladu s člankom 3. i člankom 4.a stavkom 1. Protokola (br. 21) o stajalištu Ujedinjene Kraljevine i Irske u pogledu područja slobode, sigurnosti i pravde, priloženog UEU-u i Ugovoru o funkcioniranju Europske unije (UFEU), te države članice obavijestile su o svojoj želji da sudjeluju u donošenju i primjeni ove Uredbe.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application, without prejudice to the possibility for Denmark of applying the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 laid down in this Regulation pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement of 19 October 2005 between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [5],
U skladu s člancima 1. i 2.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Protokola (br. 22) o stajalištu Danske priloženom UEU-u i UFEU-u, Danska ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Uredbe, ona ju ne obvezuje niti se na nju primjenjuje, ne dovodeći u pitanje mogućnost da Danska primjenjuje izmjene Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012 utvrđene u ovoj Uredbi sukladno članku 3. Sporazuma od 19. listopada 2005. između Europske zajednice i Kraljevine Danske o nadležnosti, priznavanju i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima [5], DONIJELI SU OVU UREDBU:
In Chapter VII of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, the following Articles are inserted:
U poglavlju VII. Uredbe (EU) br. 1215/2012, umeću se sljedeći članci:
‘Article 71a
„Članak 71.a
For the purposes of this Regulation, a court common to several Member States as specified in paragraph 2 (a ‘common court’) shall be deemed to be a court of a Member State when, pursuant to the instrument establishing it, such a common court exercises jurisdiction in matters falling within the scope of this Regulation.
Za potrebe ove Uredbe, sud koji je zajednički za više država članica kako je utvrđeno u stavku 2. („zajednički sud”) smatra se sudom države članice kada, u skladu sa instrumentom o njegovu uspostavljanju, takav zajednički sud izvršava nadležnost u stvarima koje spadaju pod okvir ove Uredbe.
For the purposes of this Regulation, each of the following courts shall be a common court:
Za potrebe ove Uredbe, svaki je od sljedećih sudova zajednički sud:
the Unified Patent Court established by the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court signed on 19 February 2013 (the ‘UPC Agreement’); and
Jedinstveni sud za patente uspostavljen na temelju Sporazuma o Jedinstvenom sudu za patente potpisanog 19. veljače 2013. („Sporazum o UPC-u”); i
the Benelux Court of Justice established by the Treaty of 31 March 1965 concerning the establishment and statute of a Benelux Court of Justice (the ‘Benelux Court of Justice Treaty’).
Sud Beneluksa uspostavljen Ugovorom od 31. ožujka 1965. o uspostavi i statutu Suda Beneluksa („Ugovor o Sudu Beneluksa”).
Article 71b
Članak 71.b
a common court shall have jurisdiction where, under this Regulation, the courts of a Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court would have jurisdiction in a matter governed by that instrument;
zajednički sud nadležan je ako, u skladu s ovom Uredbom, sudovi države članice stranke instrumenta kojim se uspostavlja zajednički sud budu nadležni za pitanja uređena tim instrumentom.
where the defendant is not domiciled in a Member State, and this Regulation does not otherwise confer jurisdiction over him, Chapter II shall apply as appropriate regardless of the defendant’s domicile.
ako tuženik nema domicil u državi članici, a ovom Uredbom nadležnost nije drukčije prenesena, prema potrebi se primjenjuje Poglavlje II. bez obzira na domicil tuženika.
Application may be made to a common court for provisional, including protective, measures even if the courts of a third State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter;
Zajedničkom sudu može se podnijeti prijedlog za privremene mjere, uključujući zaštitne, čak i kada sudovi treće države imaju stvarnu nadležnost;
where a common court has jurisdiction over a defendant under point 2 in a dispute relating to an infringement of a European patent giving rise to damage within the Union, that court may also exercise jurisdiction in relation to damage arising outside the Union from such an infringement.
ako zajednički sud ima nadležnost nad tuženikom prema točki 2. u sporu povezanom s povredom europskog patenta koji je doveo do štete unutar Unije, taj sud može izvršavati nadležnost i nad štetom koja je nastala izvan Unije zbog takve povrede.