natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Chapter VI of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 lays down the procedure with respect to the identification of non-cooperating third countries, démarches in respect of countries identified as non-cooperating third countries, the establishment of a list of non-cooperating third countries, removal from the list of non-cooperating third countries, publicity of the list of non-cooperating third countries and any emergency measures.
U poglavlju VI. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008 utvrđuju se postupak u pogledu utvrđivanja nekooperativnih trećih zemalja, demarši u vezi s državama koje su utvrđene kao nekooperativne treće zemlje, uspostavljanje popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja, brisanje s popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja, objavljivanje popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja i sve hitne mjere.
In accordance with Article 32 of the Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the Commission notified eight third countries, by a Decision of 15 November 2012 [2], of the possibility of their being identified as countries which the Commission considers as non-cooperating third countries.
U skladu s člankom 32. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008, Komisija je Odlukom od 15. studenoga 2012. [2] obavijestila osam trećih zemalja o mogućnosti da ih se utvrdi kao zemlje koje Komisija smatra nekooperativnim trećim zemljama.
In the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission included information concerning the essential facts and considerations underlying such identification.
Komisija je u svoju Odluku od 15. studenoga 2012. uključila informacije o bitnim činjenicama i zapažanjima na kojima se temelji takvo utvrđivanje.
The Commission highlighted, in those letters, that in order to avoid being identified and proposed for formal listing as a non-cooperating third country as provided for in Articles 31 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the third countries concerned were invited to establish, in close cooperation with the Commission, an action plan to rectify the shortcomings identified in the Decision of 15 November 2012.
Komisija je u tim pismima istaknula da su dotične treće zemlje, kako bi izbjegle utvrđivanje i prijedlog za formalno uvrštavanje na popis nekooperativnih trećih zemalja kako je predviđeno u člancima 31. i 33. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008, pozvane da, u bliskoj suradnji s Komisijom, izrade plan djelovanja za ispravljanje nedostataka utvrđenih u Odluci Komisije od 15. studenoga 2012.
As a consequence, the Commission invited the eight third countries concerned: (i) to take all necessary measures to implement the actions contained in the action plans suggested by the Commission; (ii) to assess the implementation of the actions contained in the action plans suggested by the Commission; and (iii) to send detailed reports to the Commission every six months assessing the implementation of each action as regards, inter alia, their individual and/or overall effectiveness in ensuring a fully compliant fisheries control system.
Komisija je stoga pozvala osam dotičnih trećih zemalja da: i. poduzmu sve potrebne mjere za provedbu djelovanja sadržanih u planovima djelovanja koje je predložila Komisija; ii. ocijene provedbu djelovanja sadržanih u planovima djelovanja koje je predložila Komisija; iii. svakih šest mjeseci Komisiji dostavljaju detaljna izvješća s ocjenom provedbe svakog djelovanja s obzirom na, između ostalog, njihovu pojedinačnu i/ili ukupnu djelotvornost u osiguravanju sustava kontrole u ribarstvu koji u potpunosti ispunjava propisane zahtjeve.
The eight third countries concerned were given the opportunity to respond in writing to issues explicitly indicated in the Decision of 15 November 2012 as well as to other relevant information, allowing them to submit evidence in order to refute or complete the facts invoked in the Decision of 15 November 2012 or to adopt, as appropriate, a plan of action to improve and measures taken to rectify the situation.
Tih osam trećih zemalja dobilo je priliku da upute pisane odgovore na pitanja koja su izričito navedena u Odluci od 15. studenoga 2012. te na druge relevantne informacije. Na taj im je način omogućeno da predlože dokaze kako bi opovrgnule ili dopunile činjenice istaknute u Odluci od 15. studenoga 2012. ili kako bi, prema potrebi, donijele plan djelovanja za poboljšavanje stanja i poduzele mjere za ispravljanje stanja.
The eight countries were assured of their right to ask for, or to provide, additional information.
Tim je zemljama osigurano pravo da traže ili pruže dodatne informacije.
On 15 November 2012, the Commission opened a process of dialogue with the eight third countries and highlighted that it considered a period of six months as being sufficient in principle for reaching an agreement.
Komisija je 15. studenoga 2012. pokrenula postupak dijaloga s tih osam trećih zemalja te je istaknula da razdoblje od šest mjeseci u načelu smatra dostatnim za postizanje dogovora.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary.
Komisija je nastavila prikupljati i provjeravati sve informacije koje je smatrala potrebnima.
The oral and written comments submitted by the eight countries following the Decision of 15 November 2012 were considered and taken into account.
Razmotrena su i uzeta u obzir usmena i pisana očitovanja koja je dostavilo tih osam zemalja slijedom Odluke od 15. studenoga 2012.
The eight countries were kept informed, either orally or in writing, of the Commission's deliberations.
Tih je osam zemalja usmenim ili pisanim putem obavješćivano o razmatranjima Komisije.
On 24 March 2014, the Council Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU [3] was adopted.
Provedbena odluka Vijeća 2014/170/EU [3] donesena je 24. ožujka 2014.
Three of the eight countries concerned by the Decision of 15 November 2012 were listed as non-cooperating third countries as they, despite taking some measures, still failed to discharge their duties under international law as flag or coastal State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Tri od osam zemalja obuhvaćenih Odlukom od 15. studenoga 2012. uvrštene su na popis nekooperativnih trećih zemalja jer unatoč pojedinim poduzetim mjerama nisu ispunile svoje obveze prema međunarodnom pravu kao država zastave ili obalna država da poduzmu djelovanja radi sprečavanja, suzbijanja i zaustavljanja NNN ribolova.
By Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU [4], the Commission identified the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (‘Sri Lanka’) as a non-cooperating third country in fighting IUU fishing.
Komisija je Provedbenom odlukom 2014/715/EU [4] Demokratsku Socijalističku Republiku Šri Lanku („Šri Lanka”) utvrdila kao nekooperativnu treću zemlju u borbi protiv ribolova NNN.
In accordance with the Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the Commission provided the reasons why it considered that Sri Lanka failed to discharge its duties under international law as flag, port, coastal or market State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
U skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1005/2008 Komisija je navela razloge zbog kojih je smatrala da Šri Lanka nije ispunila svoje obveze prema međunarodnom pravu kao država zastave, država luke, obalna države ili država trgovine da poduzme djelovanja radi sprečavanja, suzbijanja i zaustavljanja ribolova NNN.
This Decision placing Sri Lanka on the list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing should therefore be adopted in the context of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 as a result of investigation and dialogue procedures which were carried out in line with the substantive and procedural requirements laid out in that Regulation.
Ovu Odluku o uvrštavanju Šri Lanke na popis nekooperativnih trećih zemalja u borbi protiv ribolova NNN trebalo bi stoga, u kontekstu provedbe Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008, donijeti kao rezultat istražnog postupka i postupka dijaloga provedenih u skladu sa suštinskim zahtjevima i postupovnim zahtjevima koji su utvrđeni u toj Uredbi.
This Decision is based on those investigation and dialogue procedures, including the correspondence exchanged and the meetings held, as well as the Decision of 15 November 2012 and Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU.
Ova Odluka temelji se na tim istražnim postupcima i postupcima dijaloga, uključujući razmijenjenu korespondenciju i održane sastanke kao i na Odluci od 15. studenoga 2012. i Provedbenoj odluci 2014/715/EU.
The reasons underlying those procedures and acts are the same as those underlying this Decision.
Navedeni postupci i akti zasnivaju se na istim razlozima na kojima se zasniva i ova Odluka.
This Decision placing Sri Lanka on the list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing should entail the consequences stated in Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Odluka o uvrštavanju Šri Lanke na popis nekooperativnih trećih zemalja u borbi protiv ribolova NNN trebala bi za sobom povlačiti posljedice navedene u članku 38. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008.
Upon the adoption of this Decision placing Sri Lanka on the list of non-cooperating third countries in accordance with Article 33 of the Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU identifying Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating third country is no longer relevant.
Donošenjem ove Odluke o uvrštavanju Šri Lanke na popis nekooperativnih trećih zemalja u skladu s člankom 33. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008, Provedbena odluka 2014/715/EU o utvrđivanju Šri Lanke kao nekooperativne treće zemlje više nije relevantna.
Pursuant to Article 34(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove a third country from the list of non-cooperating third countries if that country demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified.
Na temelju članka 34. stavka 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008 Vijeće kvalificiranom većinom na prijedlog Komisije briše treću zemlju s popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja ako ta zemlja dokaže da je stanje zbog kojega je bila uvrštena na taj popis ispravljeno.
A removal decision is also to take into consideration whether the identified third countries concerned have taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation.
Odlukom o brisanju s popisa treba u obzir uzeti i to jesu li utvrđene dotične treće zemlje poduzele konkretne mjere kojima se može postići trajno poboljšanje stanja.
PROCEDURE WITH RESPECT TO SRI LANKA
POSTUPAK U VEZI SA ŠRI LANKOM
The Commission provided Sri Lanka with relevant information in writing.
Komisija je relevantne informacije Šri Lanki dostavila pisanim putem.
The oral and written comments submitted by Sri Lanka following the Decision of 15 November 2012 were considered and taken into account, while Sri Lanka was kept informed either orally or in writing of the Commission's deliberations.
Razmotrena su i uzeta u obzir usmena i pisana očitovanja koja je Šri Lanka dostavila slijedom Odluke Komisije od 15. studenoga 2012., te je Šri Lanka usmenim ili pisanim putem obaviješćivana o razmatranjima Komisije.
The Commission took the view that the areas of concern and shortcomings as described in the Decision of 15 November 2012 had not been addressed sufficiently by Sri Lanka.
Komisija je zauzela stajalište da Šri Lanka nije u dostatnoj mjeri riješila pitanja koja izazivaju zabrinutost i nedostatke kako su opisani u Odluci Komisije od 15. studenoga 2012.
Moreover, the Commission concluded that the measures suggested in a plan of action had not been fully implemented.
Osim toga, Komisija je zaključila da mjere predložene u planu djelovanja nisu u potpunosti provedene.
IDENTIFICATION OF SRI LANKA AS A NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRY
UTVRĐIVANJE ŠRI LANKE KAO NEKOOPERATIVNE TREĆE ZEMLJE
In the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed the duties of Sri Lanka and evaluated its compliance with its international obligations as flag, port, coastal or market State.
U Odluci od 15. studenoga 2012. Komisija je analizirala dužnosti Šri Lanke i ocijenila njezino ispunjavanje međunarodnih obveza koje ima kao država zastave, država luke, obalna država ili država trgovine.
For the purpose of that review, the Commission took into account the parameters listed in Article 31(4) to (7) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Za potrebe tog ispitivanja Komisija je u obzir uzela parametre navedene u članku 31. stavcima od 4. do 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008.
The Commission reviewed the compliance of Sri Lanka in line with the findings of the Decision of 15 November 2012, and having regard to relevant information provided thereon by Sri Lanka, the suggested plan of action, and the measures taken to rectify the situation.
Komisija je ispitala, uzevši u obzir sve relevantne informacije koje je o tome dostavila Šri Lanka, usklađenost Šri Lanke s nalazima iz Odluke od 15. studenoga 2012., predloženi plan djelovanja i mjere poduzete za ispravljanje stanja.
The main shortcomings identified by the Commission in the suggested plan of action were related to several failures to implement international law obligations, linked in particular to the failure to adopt an adequate legal framework, the lack of an adequate and efficient monitoring system, the lack of an observer scheme, the lack of a deterrent sanctioning system, and to improper implementation of the catch certification scheme.
Glavni nedostaci koje je Komisija utvrdila u predloženom planu djelovanja odnosili su se na više propusta u ispunjavanju obveza propisanih međunarodnim pravom, posebno u vezi s nedonošenjem odgovarajućeg pravnog okvira, nepostojanjem primjerenog i učinkovitog sustava praćenja, nepostojanjem programa promatrača, nepostojanjem sustava kažnjavanja koji bi imao odvraćajući učinak te nepravilnom provedbom programa certificiranja ulova.
Other identified shortcomings relate, more generally, to compliance with international obligations, including Regional Fisheries Management Organisations recommendations and resolutions, and the conditions for registration of vessels according to international law.
Drugi utvrđeni nedostaci odnose se općenitije na nepoštovanje međunarodnih obveza, uključujući preporuke i odluke regionalnih organizacija za upravljanje u ribarstvu te uvjete za registraciju plovila u skladu s međunarodnim pravom.
A lack of compliance with recommendations and resolutions from relevant bodies such as the International Plan of Action against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing of the United Nations was also identified.
Također je utvrđeno nepoštovanje preporuka i odluka mjerodavnih tijela, kao što je Međunarodni plan djelovanja Ujedinjenih naroda za sprečavanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova.
However, the lack of compliance with non-binding recommendations and resolutions was considered only as supporting evidence and not as a basis for the identification.
Međutim, nepoštovanje neobvezujućih preporuka i odluka uzeto je u obzir samo kao popratni dokaz, a ne kao osnova za utvrđivanje.
In the Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU, the Commission identified Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating third country pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
U Provedbenoj odluci 2014/715/EU, Komisija je na temelju Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008 utvrdila Šri Lanku kao nekooperativnu treću zemlju.
With respect to the possible constraints upon Sri Lanka as a developing country, it is noted that the specific development status and overall performance of Sri Lanka with respect to fisheries are not impaired by its general level of development.
U pogledu mogućih ograničenja s kojima se Šri Lanka suočava kao zemlja u razvoju, utvrđuje se da njezina opća razina razvijenosti ne utječe negativno na specifični razvojni status i ukupne rezultate Šri Lanke u pogledu ribarstva.
Having regards to the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU, and to the dialogue process with Sri Lanka entertained by the Commission and its outcome, it can be concluded that the actions undertaken by Sri Lanka in light of its duties as flag State are insufficient to comply with Articles 94, 117 and 118 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Articles 18, 19 and 20 of United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement.
Uzimajući u obzir Odluku od 15. studenoga 2012. i Provedbenu odluku 2014/715/EU kao i postupak dijaloga koji je sa Šri Lankom provela Komisija te njegov ishod, može se zaključiti da su djelovanja koja je Šri Lanka poduzela s obzirom na njezine obveze kao države zastave nedostatna za ispunjavanje članaka 94., 117. i 118. Konvencije Ujedinjenih naroda o pravu mora i članaka 18., 19. i 20. Sporazuma Ujedinjenih naroda o ribljim stokovima.
Thus, Sri Lanka has failed to discharge its duties under international law as flag State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Prema tome, Šri Lanka nije ispunila svoje obveze prema međunarodnom pravu kao država zastave da poduzme djelovanja radi sprečavanja, suzbijanja i zaustavljanja ribolova NNN.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A LIST OF NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRIES
USPOSTAVLJANJE POPISA NEKOOPERATIVNIH TREĆIH ZEMALJA
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to Sri Lanka, that country should be added, in accordance with Article 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, to the list of non-cooperating third countries established by the Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU, as amended by Council Implementing Decision 2014/914/EU [5].
S obzirom na zaključke donesene u pogledu Šri Lanke, tu državu trebalo bi dodati, u skladu s člankom 33. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008, na popis nekooperativnih trećih zemalja uspostavljen Provedbenom odlukom 2014/170/EU kako je izmjenjena Provedbenom odlukom Vijeća 2014/914/EU [5].
Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Provedbenu odluku 2014/170/EU trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
Actions in respect of Sri Lanka in the form of measures that should be applied are listed in Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Djelovanja u odnosu na Šri Lanku u obliku mjera koje bi trebalo primijeniti navedena su u članku 38. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008.
The prohibition of importation covers all stocks and species, as defined in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, since the identification as a non-cooperating third country is not due to the lack of appropriate measures adopted in relation to IUU fishing affecting a given stock or species.
Zabranom uvoza obuhvaćeni su svi stokovi i vrste kako su definirani u članku 2. stavku 8. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008 jer razlog za utvrđivanje kao nekooperativne treće zemlje nije nepostojanje odgovarajućih mjera u pogledu ribolova NNN koji pogađa određeni stok ili vrstu.
It is noted that IUU fishing, inter alia, depletes fish stocks, destroys marine habitats, undermines the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources, distorts competition, endangers food security, puts honest fishermen at an unfair disadvantage and weakens coastal communities.
Napominje se da ribolov NNN, između ostalog, osiromašuje riblje stokove, uništava morska staništa, ugrožava očuvanje i održivo iskorištavanje morskih resursa, narušava tržišno natjecanje, ugrožava sigurnost hrane, stavlja poštene ribare u nepravedno nepovoljan položaj te slabi obalne zajednice.
In view of the magnitude of the problems related to IUU fishing, it is considered necessary for the Union to expeditiously implement the actions in respect to Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating country.
S obzirom na veličinu problema povezanih s ribolovom NNN, smatra se potrebnim da Unija žurno provede djelovanja u odnosu na Šri Lanku kao nekooperativnu zemlju.
In the light of this matter, this Decision should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
S obzirom na to pitanje, ova Odluka trebala bi stupiti na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
If Sri Lanka demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified, the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove Sri Lanka from the list of non-cooperating third countries in line with Article 34(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Ako Šri Lanka dokaže da je stanje zbog kojeg je bila uvrštena na popis ispravljeno, Vijeće kvalificiranom većinom na prijedlog Komisije briše tu zemlju s popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja u skladu s člankom 34. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008.
Any removal decision should also take into consideration whether Sri Lanka has taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation,
Odlukom o brisanju s popisa trebalo bi u obzir uzeti i to je li Šri Lanka poduzela konkretne mjere kojima se može postići trajno poboljšanje stanja,
The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka shall be added to the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU.
Demokratska Socijalistička Republika Šri Lanka dodaje se u Prilog Provedbenoj odluci 2014/170/EU.
Commission Decision of 15 November 2012 on notifying the third countries that the Commission considers as possible of being identified as non-cooperating third countries pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ C 354, 17.11.2012, p. 1).
Odluka Komisije od 15. studenoga 2012. o obavješćivanju trećih zemalja da prema mišljenju Komisije postoji mogućnost njihova utvrđivanja kao nekooperativnih trećih zemalja na temelju Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1005/2008 o uspostavi sustava Zajednice za sprečavanje, suzbijanje i zaustavljanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova (SL C 354, 17.11.2012., str. 1.).
Council Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU of 24 March 2014 establishing a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ L 91, 27.3.2014, p. 43).
Provedbena odluka Vijeća 2014/170/EU od 24. ožujka 2014. o uspostavljanju popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja borbi protiv ribolova NNN na temelju Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008 o uspostavi sustava Zajednice za sprečavanje, suzbijanje i zaustavljanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova (SL L 91, 27.3.2014., str. 43.).
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU of 14 October 2014 identifying a third country that the Commission considers as non- cooperating third country pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ L 297, 15.10.2014, p. 13).
Provedbena odluka Komisije 2014/715/EU оd 14. listopada 2014. o utvrđivanju treće zemlje za koju Komisija smatra da je nekooperativna treća zemlja u skladu s Uredbom Vijeća (EZ) br. 1005/2008 o uspostavi sustava Zajednice za sprečavanje, suzbijanje i zaustavljanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova (SL L 297, 15.10.2014., str. 13.).
Council Implementing Decision 2014/914/EU of 15 December 2014 amending Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU establishing a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing as regards Belize (OJ L 360, 17.12.2014, p. 53).
Provedbena odluka Vijeća 2014/914/EU od 15. prosinca 2014. o izmjeni Provedbene odluke 2014/170/EU o uspostavljanju popisa nekooperativnih trećih zemalja u borbi protiv ribolova NNN na temelju Uredbe (EZ) br. 1005/2008 o uspostavi sustava Zajednice za sprečavanje, suzbijanje i zaustavljanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova u pogledu Belizea (SL L 360, 17.12.2014., str. 53.).