natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, the operators cannot unilaterally decide to stop the operation of unprofitable lines; neither can they influence the scope and frequency of services on the lines they operate.
Osim toga, operatori ne mogu jednostrano odlučiti o prekidu prometovanja na neprofitabilnim linijama niti mogu utjecati na opseg i učestalost usluga na linijama kojima prometuju.
The Czech authorities did not provide the average profit figures for the year 2006.
Češka tijela nisu dostavila iznose prosječne dobiti za 2006.
However, the average profit margin for 2006 is likely to be in the same range as those for 2005 and 2007 since the other relevant figures (such as the average price per kilometre amounting in 2007 to CZK 31,72, average provable loss per kilometre amounting to CZK 17,49) remained in the same range and the methodology for calculation of the reasonable profit was the same (see footnote 9).
Međutim, vjerojatno je da je prosječna profitna marža za 2006. na istoj razini kao i za 2005. i 2007. jer su se ostali relevantni iznosi (poput prosječne cijene po kilometru, koja je u 2007. iznosila 31,72 CZK/km, i prosječnog dokazivog gubitka po kilometru, koji je iznosio 17,49 CZK) zadržali na istoj razini, a metodologija izračuna razumne dobiti bila je ista (vidjeti bilješku 9.).
In addition, while the range of prices for different operators was between CZK 21,50 and CZK 37,16 per kilometre in 2005, it ranged between CZK 25,48 and CZK 45,79 per kilometre in 2007.
Osim toga, dok su se u 2005. cijene različitih operatora kretale od 21,50 CZK do 37,16 CZK po kilometru, u 2007. kretale su se od 25,48 CZK do 45,79 CZK po kilometru.
The Czech authorities argue that since the average level of the price per kilometre and the range of individual prices did not differ materially between 2005 and 2007, the prices in 2005 should be considered as corresponding to the costs of a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided with means of transport.
Češka tijela tvrde da, s obzirom na to da se prosječna razina cijene po kilometru i raspon pojedinačnih cijena nisu bitno promijenili između 2005. i 2007., treba smatrati da se cijene u 2005. podudaraju s troškovima tipičnog poduzeća, kojim se primjereno upravlja i koje ima odgovarajuća prijevozna sredstva.
DP Ústí obtained guarantees from the Municipality of Ústí nad Labem securing bank loans of CZK 35 million and CZK 5 million in 2004 and 2005.
Općina Ústí nad Labem dala je jamstva društvu DP Ústí za osiguranje bankovnih kredita u iznosu od 35 milijuna CZK, odnosno 5 milijuna CZK u 2004. i 2005.
Those loans were obtained for finalising the construction of the trolley-bus line Ústí nad Labem — Střekov.
Ti su krediti zatraženi za dovršetak izgradnje linije trolejbusa Ústí nad Labem – Střekov.
Decree of the Ministry of Transport and Communications No 50/1998, on provable loss in the public line passenger transport, was replaced by Regulation No 493/2004 as of 21 September 2004.
Dekret Ministarstva prometa i komunikacija br. 50/1998 Coll. o dokazivom gubitku u javnom linijskom prijevozu putnika zamijenjen je Uredbom br. 493/2004 Coll. od 21. rujna 2004.
Regulation No 493/2004 remained in force until 1 July 2010, that is during the period when the compensations under investigation were granted.
Uredba br. 493/2004 Coll. ostala je na snazi do 1. srpnja 2010., odnosno tijekom razdoblja u kojem su odobrene naknade koje su predmet istražnog postupka.
The Commission also refers in this respect to the reasoning developed in recitals 307 to 313 of its Decision C(2010) 975 final of 24 February 2010 in Case C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08) concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (OJ L 7, 11.1.2011, p. 1).
Komisija se u ovome pogledu poziva i na argumente navedene u uvodnim izjavama (307) do (313) svoje Odluke C (2010) 975 završna verzija od 24. veljače 2010. u predmetu C 41/08 (bivši NN 35/08) o ugovorima o uslugama javnog prijevoza između danskog Ministarstva prometa i Danske Statsbaner (SL L 7, 11.1.2011., str. 1.).
That Decision was annulled by the General Court in Case T-92/11 Jørgen Andersen v Commission [2013] ECR II-0000.
Opći sud tu je Odluku poništio u predmetu T-92/11 Jørgen Andersen protiv Komisije [2013] ECR II-0000.
The judgment is currently under appeal before the Court of Justice in Case C-303/13 P.
Ta je presuda trenutačno predmet žalbenog postupka pred Sudom u predmetu C-303/13 P.
However, according to Article 8(2), ‘without prejudice to paragraph 3, the award of public service contracts by rail and by road shall comply with Article 5 as from 3 December 2019’.
Međutim, u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 2.
On that basis, the public transport service contracts in question could be awarded directly.
„ne dovodeći u pitanje stavak 3., dodjela ugovora o javnim uslugama u željezničkom i cestovnom prijevozu u skladu je s člankom 5. od 3. prosinca 2019.” Na toj su se osnovi predmetni ugovori o pružanju usluge javnog prijevoza mogli izravno dodijeliti.
DPÚK did not comment on the notion of unforeseeable costs. Nor did it comment on the fact that the pre-establishment of a maximum price for compensation based on national statistical analysis could guarantee the absence of over-compensation for the operators.
Društvo DPÚK nije imalo primjedbi na pojam nepredvidivih troškova ni na činjenicu da se zahvaljujući prethodnom utvrđivanju najviše cijene za naknadu na temelju nacionalne statističke analize može jamčiti izostanak prekomjernih naknada operatorima.
The Commission received comments from one interested party, DPÚK, on 22 August 2008. It forwarded those comments to the Czech Republic, which was given the opportunity to respond;
Komisija je 22. kolovoza 2008. zaprimila primjedbe jedne zainteresirane strane, društva DPÚK.
The Commission notes that in the present case the guarantee was indeed properly measurable since it was directly linked to two bank loans of CZK 35 million and CZK 5 million. Moreover, those loans were obtained strictly for the financing of public transport infrastructure — the construction of the additional trolley-bus line in Ústí nad Labem.
Komisija napominje da je u ovom slučaju jamstvo uistinu pravilno mjerljivo jer je izravno povezano s dva bankovna kredita u iznosu od 35 milijuna CZK, odnosno 5 milijuna CZK. osim toga, ti su krediti dobiveni isključivo za financiranje infrastrukture javnog prijevoza – izgradnju dodatne linije trolejbusa u općini Ústí nad Labem.
on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation
o sklapanju, u ime Europske unije, Sporazuma između Europske unije i Francuske Republike o primjeni zakonodavstva Unije o oporezivanju dohotka od štednje i administrativnoj suradnji u području oporezivanja u vezi sa zajednicom Saint-Barthélemy
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 113 and 115, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(b) and (8), second subparagraph, thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegove članke 113. i 115. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 6. točkom (b) i stavkom 8. drugim podstavkom,
In accordance with Council Decision 2013/671/EU [1], the Agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (hereinafter ‘the Agreement’) was signed on 17 February 2014, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
U skladu s Odlukom Vijeća 2013/671/EU [1], Sporazum između Europske unije i Francuske Republike o primjeni zakonodavstva Unije o oporezivanju dohotka od štednje i administrativnoj suradnji u području oporezivanja u vezi sa zajednicom Saint-Barthélemy (dalje u tekstu „Sporazum”) potpisan je 17. veljače 2014., podložno njegovom kasnijem sklapanju.
The purpose of the Agreement is to ensure that the mechanisms of Council Directive 2011/16/EU [2] and Council Directive 2003/48/EC [3], designed in particular to combat fraud and cross-border tax evasion, continue to apply to Saint-Barthélemy despite its changed status.
Svrha je Sporazuma osigurati da se mehanizmi Direktive Vijeća 2011/16/EU [2] i Direktive Vijeća 2003/48/EZ [3], čiji je cilj posebno borba protiv prekogranične prijevare i prekogranične utaje poreza, nastave primjenjivati na Saint-Barthélemy usprkos promjeni njegova statusa.
The Agreement should be concluded,
Sporazum bi trebalo sklopiti,
The Agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Sporazum između Europske unije i Francuske Republike o primjeni zakonodavstva Unije o oporezivanju dohotka od štednje i administrativnoj suradnji u području oporezivanja u vezi sa zajednicom Saint-Barthélemy odobrava se u ime Unije.
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 7 of the Agreement. [4]Article 3
Predsjednik Vijeća u ime Unije šalje obavijest predviđenu u članku 7. Sporazuma [4].Članak 3.
Council Decision 2013/671/EU of 15 November 2013 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (OJ L 313, 22.11.2013, p. 1).
Odluka Vijeća 2013/671/EU od 15. studenoga 2013. o potpisivanju, u ime Europske unije, Sporazuma između Europske unije i Francuske Republike o primjeni zakonodavstva Unije o oporezivanju dohotka od štednje i administrativnoj suradnji u području oporezivanja u vezi sa zajednicom Saint-Barthélemy (SL L 313, 22.11.2013., str. 1.).
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee on Cultural Cooperation set up by the Protocol on cultural cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, as regards the establishment of a list of 15 arbitrators
o stajalištu koje treba zauzeti u ime Europske unije u okviru Odbora za suradnju u području kulture osnovanog Protokolom o suradnji u području kulture uz Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane, u pogledu sastavljanja popisa 15 arbitara
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 167(3) in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 167. stavak 3. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 9.,
The Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part [1] (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 6 October 2010. The Agreement contains a Protocol on Cultural Cooperation (‘the Protocol’) which, according to Article 1 thereof, sets up the framework within which the Parties cooperate for facilitating exchanges regarding cultural activities, goods and services, including, inter alia, in the audiovisual sector.
Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane [1] (dalje u tekstu „Sporazum”), potpisan je 6. listopada 2010. Sporazum sadrži Protokol o suradnji u području kulture („Protokol”) kojim se, u skladu s njegovim člankom 1., utvrđuje okvir unutar kojega stranke surađuju kako bi olakšale razmjenu u pogledu kulturnih djelatnosti, dobara i usluga, uključujući, između ostalog, u audiovizualnom sektoru.
Pursuant to Article 15.10.5 of the Agreement, it has been provisionally applied in part by Council Decision 2011/265/EU [2] (‘the Decision’) since 1 July 2011, pending the completion of the procedures for its conclusion.
Sporazum se, u skladu s njegovim člankom 15.10.5., djelomično privremeno primjenjuje Odlukom Vijeća 2011/265/EU [2] („Odluka”) od 1. srpnja 2011. do završetka postupaka potrebnih za njegovo sklapanje.
Pursuant to Article 6 of the Decision, the position to be taken by the Union in the Committee on Cultural Cooperation (‘the Committee’) on decisions having legal effects shall be determined by the Council acting in accordance with the Treaty.
U skladu s člankom 6. Odluke, Vijeće, odlučujući u skladu s Ugovorom, određuje stajalište koje Europska unija treba zauzeti u Odboru za suradnju u području kulture („Odbor”) o odlukama koje proizvode pravne učinke.
Article 3bis of the Protocol provides that the Committee shall, promptly after its establishment, establish a list of 15 individuals to serve as arbitrators.
Člankom 3.a Protokola predviđa se da Odbor odmah nakon svog osnivanja sastavlja popis 15 osoba koje će obavljati funkciju arbitra.
The Union should determine the position to be taken in the Committee with regard to the establishment of the list of arbitrators.
Unija bi trebala utvrditi stajalište koje treba zauzeti u Odboru u pogledu sastavljanja popisa arbitara.
The position of the Union within the Committee should therefore be based on the attached draft Decision,
Stajalište Unije u okviru Odbora trebalo bi se stoga temeljiti na priloženom nacrtu Odluke,
The position to be taken on behalf of the Union within the Committee on Cultural Cooperation, set up by the Protocol on cultural cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, as regards the establishment of the list of 15 individuals to serve as arbitrators shall be based on the draft decision of the Committee on Cultural Cooperation attached to this Decision.
Stajalište koje u ime Unije treba zauzeti u Oboru za suradnju u području kulture, osnovanom Protokolom o suradnji u području kulture uz Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane, u pogledu sastavljanja popisa 15 osoba koje će obavljati funkciju arbitra temelji se na nacrtu odluke Odbora o suradnji u području kulture priloženom ovoj Odluci.
on the establishment of a list of arbitrators referred to in Article 3bis of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part
o sastavljanju popisa 15 arbitara iz članka 3.a Protokola o suradnji u području kulture uz Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane
THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURAL COOPERATION,
ODBOR ZA SURADNJU U PODRUČJU KULTURE,
Having regard to the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 6 October 2010, and in particular Article 3bis thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Protokol o suradnji u području kulture uz Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane, potpisan u Bruxellesu 6. listopada 2010., a posebno njegov članak 3.a,
Article 3bis of the Protocol on cultural cooperation (‘the Protocol’) provides for a dispute settlement set out in Chapter Fourteen of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, whereby disputes are solved through recourse to a panel of arbitrators.
Člankom 3.a Protokola o suradnji u području kulture („Protokol”) predviđa se rješavanje sporova navedeno u četrnaestom poglavlju Sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Koreje, s druge strane, pri čemu se sporovi rješavaju uključivanjem arbitražnog vijeća.
In the event of a dispute, the Parties shall consult in order to reach an agreement on the composition of the arbitration panel.
U slučaju spora stranke se međusobno savjetuju kako bi postigle dogovor o sastavu arbitražnog vijeća.
If the Parties are unable to agree on the composition of the arbitration panel, the composition shall be determined through selection by lot from the list established in accordance with point (c) of Article 3bis of the Protocol.
Ako stranke ne mogu postići dogovor o sastavu arbitražnog vijeća, sastav se utvrđuje putem odabira ždrijebom s popisa osoba sastavljenog u skladu s člankom 3.a točkom (c) Protokola.
The Parties have agreed on a list of 15 arbitrators,
Stranke su postigle dogovor o popisu 15 arbitara,
The list of 15 arbitrators is hereby established in accordance with point (c) of Article 3bis of the Protocol.
Sastavlja se popis 15 arbitara u skladu s člankom 3.a točkom (c) Protokola.
The list is set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Popis je naveden u Prilogu ovoj Odluci.
Done at … on …
Sastavljeno u … ….
First Vice-Minister
Prvi zamjenik ministra
Director-General of the Directorate General for Education and Culture
Glavni direktor Glavne uprave za obrazovanje i kulturu
Arbitrators proposed by the EU
Arbitri koje predlaže EU
Arbitrators proposed by Korea
Arbitri koje predlaže Koreja
Florentino P. FELICIANO (Philippines)
Florentino P. FELICIANO (Filipini)
Juan Antonio DORANTES (Mexico)
Juan Antonio DORANTES (Meksiko)
Christian HÄBERLI (Switzerland)
Christian HÄBERLI (Švicarska)
Leng Sun CHAN (Malaysia)
Leng Sun CHAN (Malezija)
Teresa CHENG (China)
Teresa CHENG (Kina)
extending the application of Implementing Decision 2011/335/EU authorising the Republic of Lithuania to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o produljenju primjene Provedbene odluke 2011/335/EU kojom se Republici Litvi odobrava primjena mjere kojom se odstupa od članka 287. Direktive 2006/112/EZ o zajedničkom sustavu poreza na dodanu vrijednost
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax [1] (the VAT Directive), and in particular Article 395(1) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu Vijeća 2006/112/EZ od 28. studenoga 2006. o zajedničkom sustavu poreza na dodanu vrijednost [1] (Direktiva o PDV-u), a posebno njezin članak 395. stavak 1.,
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 16 May 2014, Lithuania requested authorisation for a measure derogating from Article 287(11) of the VAT Directive in order to continue to exempt certain taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 45000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession to the Union (‘the measure’).
Litva je pismom evidentiranim u glavnom tajništvu Komisije 16. svibnja 2014. zatražila odobrenje za mjeru kojom se odstupa od članka 287. točke 11. Direktive o PDV-u kako bi nastavila izuzimati određene porezne obveznike čiji godišnji promet ne prelazi protuvrijednost 45000 EUR u nacionalnoj valuti prema deviznom tečaju na dan njezina pristupanja Uniji („mjera”).
The measure would release those taxable persons from certain or all of the obligations in relation to value added tax (VAT) referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of the VAT Directive.
Tom bi mjerom navedeni porezni obveznici bili oslobođeni od određenih ili svih obveza u vezi s porezom na dodanu vrijednost (PDV) iz glave XI. poglavlja od 2. do 6. Direktive o PDV-u.
By letter dated 6 June 2014, the Commission informed the other Member States of the request made by Lithuania.
Komisija je pismom od 6. lipnja 2014. obavijestila ostale države članice o zahtjevu Litve.
By letter dated 12 June 2014, the Commission notified Lithuania that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
Komisija je pismom od 12. lipnja 2014. obavijestila Litvu da ima sve informacije potrebne za razmatranje zahtjeva.
A special scheme for small enterprises is already available to Member States under Title XII of the VAT Directive.
Na temelju glave XII. Direktive o PDV-u države članice već mogu primjenjivati posebne odredbe za mala poduzeća.
The extended measure derogates from Title XII of the VAT Directive only in so far as the taxable person's annual turnover threshold for the special scheme is higher than that allowed for Lithuania under Article 287(11) of the VAT Directive, which is EUR 29000.
Produljenom mjerom odstupa se od glave XII. Direktive o PDV-u samo utoliko što je prag godišnjeg prometa poreznog obveznika za te posebne odredbe viši od onoga koji je trenutačno dopušten za Litvu u skladu s člankom 287. točkom 11. Direktive o PDV-u, a koji iznosi 29000 EUR.
By Council Implementing Decision 2011/335/EU, [2] Lithuania was authorised, as a derogating measure, to exempt taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 45000 until 31 December 2014. Given that this threshold has resulted in reduced VAT obligations for smaller businesses, Lithuania should be authorised to extend the measure for a further limited period.
Provedbenom odlukom Vijeća 2011/335/EU [2] Litvi je odobreno da, u okviru mjere odstupanja, izuzme, do 31. prosinca 2014., porezne obveznike čiji godišnji promet ne prelazi 45000 EUR. Budući da su se zbog tog praga smanjile obveze malih poslovnih subjekata u vezi s PDV-om, Litvi bi trebalo odobriti da produlji mjeru za daljnje ograničeno razdoblje.
Taxable persons may still opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
Porezni obveznici se kao i ranije mogu odlučiti za uobičajene odredbe o PDV-u.
From information provided by Lithuania, the extension of the derogation will only have a negligible impact on the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the final stage of consumption.
Prema informacijama koje je dostavila Litva produljenje odstupanja imat će zanemariv utjecaj na ukupni iznos poreznog prihoda prikupljen u fazi konačne potrošnje.
In the second paragraph of Article 2 of Implementing Decision 2011/335/EU, the date ‘31 December 2014’ is replaced by ‘31 December 2017’.
U članku 2. drugom stavku Provedbene odluke 2011/335/EU datum „31. prosinca 2014.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. prosinca 2017.”.
Council Implementing Decision 2011/335/EU of 30 May 2011 authorising the Republic of Lithuania to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 150, 9.6.2011, p. 6.).
Provedbena Odluka Vijeća 2011/335/EU od 30. svibnja 2011. kojom se Republici Litvi odobrava primjena mjere kojom se odstupa od članka 287. Direktive 2006/112/EZ o zajedničkom sustavu poreza na dodanu vrijednost (SL L 150, 9.6.2011., str. 6.).
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 7 of the Agreement.
Predsjednik Vijeća u ime Unije šalje obavijest predviđenu u članku 7.
authorising the Republic of Latvia to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
kojom se Republici Latviji odobrava primjena mjere kojom se odstupa od članka 287. Direktive 2006/112/EZ o zajedničkom sustavu poreza na dodanu vrijednost
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 1 July 2014, Latvia requested authorisation for a measure derogating from Article 287(10) of the VAT Directive in order to exempt certain taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 50000 (‘the measure’).
Latvija je pismom evidentiranim u glavnom tajništvu Komisije 1. srpnja 2014. zatražila odobrenje za mjeru kojom se odstupa od članka 287. točke 10. Direktive o PDV-u kako bi izuzela određene porezne obveznike čiji godišnji promet ne prelazi 50000 EUR („mjera”).