natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
acid oils from chemical refining, soap stocks and crude coconut oil shall be analysed and documented as part of the HACCP system.
kisela ulja od kemijskog rafiniranja, sapunski talozi i sirovo kokosovo ulje analiziraju se i dokumentiraju kao dio sustava HACCP-a;
Fat blending establishments:
objekti za miješanje masti:
100 % of incoming batches of crude coconut oil, animal fats not covered by point (b) or (h), fish oil not covered by point (c) or (h), oils and fats recovered from food business operators falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, blended fats and oils and products derived from oils and fats, except for the following:
i. 100 % ulaznih serija sirovog kokosovog ulja, životinjskih masti koje nisu navedene u točki (b) ili (h), ribljeg ulja koje nije navedeno u točki (c) ili (h), otpadnih ulja i masti od subjekata u poslovanju s hranom obuhvaćenih područjem primjene Uredbe (EZ) br. 852/2004, mješavina masti i ulja te proizvoda dobivenih od ulja i masti osim sljedećeg:
acid oils from chemical refining, crude fatty acids from splitting, pure distilled fatty acids from splitting and soap stocks shall be analysed and documented as part of the HACCP system;
kisela ulja od kemijskog rafiniranja, sirove masne kiseline nastale cijepanjem, čiste destilirane masne kiseline nastale cijepanjem i sapunski talozi analiziraju se i dokumentiraju kao dio sustava HACCP-a
100 % of the batches of blended fats and oils intended for feed.
100 % serija mješavina masti i ulja namijenjenih za hranu za životinje.
The feed business operator shall declare to the competent authority which alternative he chooses.
Subjekt u poslovanju s hranom za životinje nadležnom tijelu daje izjavu o alternativi koju je izabrao;
Producers of compound feed for food producing animals other than those covered by point (f):
proizvođači krmnih smjesa za životinje koje proizvode hranu osim onih iz točke (f):
acid oils from chemical refining, crude fatty acids from splitting, pure distilled fatty acids from splitting; filter aids, bleaching earth and soap stocks shall be analysed and documented as part of the HACCP system;
kisela ulja od kemijskog rafiniranja, sirove masne kiseline nastale cijepanjem, čiste destilirane masne kiseline nastale cijepanjem; sredstvo za filtriranje, zemlja za bijeljenje i sapunski talozi analiziraju se i dokumentiraju kao dio sustava HACCP-a;
1 % of the batches as regards manufactured compound feed containing products referred to in (i) and (ii).
1 % serija proizvedene krmne smjese koja sadržava proizvode iz podtočaka i. i ii.;
Importers placing the following feed on the market:
uvoznici koji stavljaju na tržište sljedeću hranu za životinje:
100 % of imported batches of crude coconut oil, animal fats, fish oils, oils and fats recovered from food business operators, blended fats and oils, tocopherols extracted from vegetable oil and tocopheryl acetate made thereof and products derived from oils and fats, except for the following:
i. 100 % uvezenih serija sirovog kokosovog ulja, životinjskih masti, ribljih ulja, otpadnih ulja i masti od subjekata u poslovanju s hranom, miješanih masti i ulja, tokoferola dobivenih od biljnih ulja i tokoferil acetata dobivenog od njih te proizvoda dobivenih od ulja i masti osim sljedećeg:
acid oils from chemical refining, crude fatty acids from splitting, pure distilled fatty acids from splitting and soap stocks shall be analysed and documented as part of the HACCP system.
kisela ulja od kemijskog rafiniranja, sirove masne kiseline nastale cijepanjem, čiste destilirane masne kiseline nastale cijepanjem i sapunski talozi analiziraju se i dokumentiraju kao dio sustava HACCP-a.
points 4, 5 and 6 are replaced by the following:
točke 4., 5. i 6. zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
Where a feed business operator has documentary proof that a batch of a product or all components of a batch of a product as referred to under point 2 entering his establishment has already been analysed at an earlier stage of production, processing or distribution, the feed business operator shall be released from the obligation to analyse this batch.
Ako subjekt u poslovanju s hranom za životinje ima dokumentirani dokaz da su serija proizvoda ili sve sastavnice serije proizvoda kako je navedeno u točki 2. koje ulaze u njegov objekt već analizirane u ranijoj fazi proizvodnje, prerade ili distribucije, subjekt u poslovanju s hranom za životinje oslobađa se obveze analize te serije.
Any batch of products analysed in accordance with point 2 shall be accompanied by documentary proof that these products, or all of its constituent components, have been analysed or have been submitted for analysis to an accredited laboratory referred to in point 1, except for the batches of products referred to in point 2(a)(ii), (b)(i), (c)(iii), (c)(iv), (d)(iii), (e)(iii), (f)(ii), (g)(ii) and (h)(ii).
Svakoj seriji proizvoda analiziranoj u skladu s točkom 2. prilaže se dokumentirani dokaz da su ti proizvodi, ili svi njihovi sastavni dijelovi, bili analizirani ili dostavljeni na analizu u ovlaštenom laboratoriju iz točke 1., osim za serije proizvoda iz točke 2. podtočaka (a)ii., (b)i., (c)iii., (c)iv., (d)iii., (e)iii., (f)ii., (g)ii. i (h)ii.
The proof of analysis shall unambiguously link the delivery and the batch or batches tested.
Dokaz o analizi nedvosmisleno povezuje dostavu i testiranu seriju ili serije.
This link shall be described in the documented traceability system in place at the premises of the supplier.
Ta povezanost opisuje se u postojećem dokumentiranom sustavu sljedivosti u prostorijama dobavljača.
In particular, when the delivery is obtained from more than one batch or component, the documentary proof to be provided shall be a proof for each of the components of the delivery.
Posebno treba naglasiti da kada se dostava vrši iz više od jedne serije ili sastavnice, dokumentirani dokaz koji treba dostaviti odnosi se na sve sastavnice dostave.
In the case where the testing is performed on the outgoing product, the proof that the product has been analysed shall be the analytical report.
U slučaju kad se testiranje provodi na izlaznom proizvodu, dokaz da je proizvod analiziran analitičko je izvješće.
Any delivery of products as referred to under point 2(b) (i) or c (iii) shall be accompanied by a proof that these products are in compliance with the requirements of point 2(b)(i) or (c)(iii).
Svakoj dostavi proizvoda iz točke 2. podtočke (b)i. ili (c)iii. potrebno je priložiti dokaz da su ti proizvodi u skladu sa zahtjevima iz točke 2. podtočke (b)i. ili (c)iii.
If required, the proof of analysis that include the batch or batches delivered must be consigned to the consignee when the operator receives the analysis from the authorised laboratories.
Ako je potrebno, dokaz o analizi koja uključuje dostavljenu seriju ili serije mora biti poslan primatelju kada subjekt primi analizu ovlaštenih laboratorija.
If all incoming batches of products referred to in point 2(g)(i) entering a production process have been analysed in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation and if it can be assured that the production process, handling and storage does not increase the dioxin contamination, the feed business operator shall be released from the obligation to analyse the outgoing product and instead analyse it according to the HACCP system.’
Ako su sve ulazne serije proizvoda navedene u točki 2. podtočki (g)i. koje ulaze u proizvodni proces bile analizirane u skladu sa zahtjevima ove Uredbe i ako se može dokazati da proizvodni proces, rukovanje i skladištenje ne povećavaju kontaminaciju dioksinom, subjekt u poslovanju s hranom za životinje oslobođen je obveze analize izlaznog proizvoda te ga umjesto toga analizira u skladu sa sustavom HACCP-a.”.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (OJ L 29, 30.1.2013, p. 1).’;
Uredba Komisije (EU) br. 68/2013 od 16. siječnja 2013. o Katalogu krmiva (SL L 29, 30.1.2013., str. 1.).”.
Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed (OJ L 229, 1.9.2009, p. 1).’;
Uredba (EZ) br. 767/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 13. srpnja 2009. o stavljanju na tržište i korištenju hrane za životinje (SL L 229, 1.9.2009., str. 1.).”.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015 defining acceptability criteria for detoxification processes applied to products intended for animal feed as provided for in Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 125, 21.5.2015, p. 10).’;
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/786 оd 19. svibnja 2015. o utvrđivanju kriterija prihvatljivosti za postupke detoksifikacije koji se primjenjuju na proizvode namijenjene hrani za životinje kako je predviđeno Direktivom 2002/32/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća (SL L 125, 21.5.2015., str. 10.).”;
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1906
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1906
amending Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 on recycled plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foods
o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 282/2008 o materijalima i predmetima od reciklirane plastike koji dolaze u dodir s hranom
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC [1], and in particular Article 5(1)(n) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 1935/2004 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 27. listopada 2004. o materijalima i predmetima koji dolaze u dodir s hranom i stavljanju izvan snage direktiva 80/590/EEZ i 89/109/EEZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 5. stavak 1. točku (n),
Recital 20 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 [2] states that decisions to authorise plastic recycling processes should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure described in Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004.
U uvodnoj izjavi 20. Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 282/2008 [2] navodi se da odluke o odobrenju postupaka za recikliranje plastike treba donijeti u skladu s regulatornim postupkom iz članka 23. stavka 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004.
Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 which is concerned with such decisions refers in its paragraph 1 to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004.
Članak 6. Uredbe (EZ) br. 282/2008 odnosi se na takve odluke, a u njegovu stavku 1. upućuje se na članak 11. stavak 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004.
When Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 was adopted, both Articles 11(3) and 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 referred to the regulatory procedure established in Article 5 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC [3].
Kada je Uredba (EZ) br. 282/2008 donesena, članak 11. stavak 3. i članak 23. stavak 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004 upućivali su na regulatorni postupak utvrđen u članku 5. Odluke Vijeća 1999/468/EZ [3].
Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 was amended by Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] to introduce the regulatory procedure with scrutiny established in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC by referring to a newly inserted Article 23(4) in Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004.
Članak 11. stavak 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004 izmijenjen je Uredbom (EZ) br. 596/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [4] radi uvođenja regulatornog postupka s kontrolom iz članka 5.a Odluke 1999/468/EZ upućivanjem na novoumetnuti članak 23. stavak 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004.
Given that the authorisation of a plastic recycling process is an act of individual scope designed to implement Article 5(1)(n) of Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 and that precise criteria governing the authorisation are set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 282/2008, the regulatory procedure to which Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 refers, should apply.
S obzirom na to da je odobrenje za postupak recikliranja plastike akt pojedinačnog područja primjene namijenjen provedbi članka 5. stavka 1. točke (n) Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004 i da su precizni uvjeti za odobrenje utvrđeni u članku 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 282/2008, trebao bi se primjenjivati regulatorni postupak na koji se upućuje u članku 23. stavku 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1935/2004.
However, the regulatory procedure does not exist any more since Decision 1999/468/EC has been replaced by Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Međutim, taj regulatorni postupak više ne postoji jer je Odluka 1999/468/EZ zamijenjena Uredbom (EU) br. 182/2011 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [5].
Under Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, the examination procedure is the appropriate procedure for authorisation of plastic recycling processes.
U skladu s Uredbom (EU) br. 182/2011, postupak ispitivanja odgovarajući je postupak za odobrenje postupaka recikliranja plastike.
The reference to the adoption procedure in Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 should be adapted.
Upućivanje na postupak donošenja iz Uredbe (EZ) br. 282/2008 trebalo bi prilagoditi.
Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbu (EZ) br. 282/2008 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 is replaced by the following:
Članak 6. stavak 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 282/2008 zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
The Commission shall adopt a Decision addressed to the applicant granting or refusing authorisation of the recycling process.
Komisija donosi odluku o davanju ili odbijanju odobrenja za postupak recikliranja upućenu podnositelju zahtjeva.
Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply.The Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed established by Article 58(1) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Primjenjuje se članak 5. Uredbe (EU) br. 182/2011 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća.Komisiji pomaže Stalni odbor za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje osnovan na temelju članka 58. stavka 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 178/2002 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 282/2008 of 27 March 2008 on recycled plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foods and amending Regulation (EC) No 2023/2006 (OJ L 86, 28.3.2008, p. 9).
Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 282/2008 od 27. ožujka 2008. o materijalima i predmetima od reciklirane plastike koji dolaze u dodir s hranom i o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 2023/2006 (SL L 86, 28.3.2008., str. 9.).
Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Uredba (EZ) br. 596/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 18. lipnja 2009. o prilagodbi većeg broja instrumenata koji podliježu postupku iz članka 251. Ugovora Odluci Vijeća 1999/468/EZ u pogledu regulatornog postupka s kontrolom.
Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Four (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 14).
Prilagodba regulatornom postupku s kontrolom – četvrti dio (SL L 188, 18.7.2009., str. 14.).
Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).’.
Uredba (EZ) br. 178/2002 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 28. siječnja 2002. o utvrđivanju općih načela i uvjeta zakona o hrani, osnivanju Europske agencije za sigurnost hrane te utvrđivanju postupaka u područjima sigurnosti hrane (SL L 31, 1.2.2002., str. 1.).”
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1907
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1907
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1910
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1910
amending Annexes III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for guazatine in or on certain products
o izmjeni priloga III. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu maksimalnih razina ostataka gvazatina u ili na određenim proizvodima
For guazatine, maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO-ovi) za gvazatin utvrđene su u dijelu A Priloga III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
The European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs for guazatine in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 [2].
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane, dalje u tekstu „Agencija”, dostavila je za gvazatin obrazloženo mišljenje o postojećim MRO-ovima u skladu s člankom 12. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 [2].
All existing authorisations for plant protection products containing the active substance guazatine have been revoked.
Sva su postojeća odobrenja za sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju djelatnu tvar gvazatin ukinuta.
Neither were import tolerances reported at Union level nor were Codex MRLs available.
Nisu prijavljena uvozna odstupanja na razini Unije niti su dostupni MRO-ovi iz Codexa.
In the absence of information on specific good agricultural practices that could be used in a consumer risk assessment, the Authority concluded that a value of 0,05 mg/kg provides a satisfactory level of protection for the European consumers.
U nedostatku informacija o posebnim dobrim poljoprivrednim praksama koje bi se mogle upotrijebiti u procjeni rizika za potrošače, Agencija je zaključila da vrijednost od 0,05 mg/kg čini zadovoljavajuću razinu zaštite za europske potrošače.
Moreover, Belgium indicated that the existing MRLs for guazatine in grapefruit and oranges may raise concerns of consumer protection.
Osim toga Belgija je navela da postojeći MRO-ovi za gvazatin u grejpu i narančama mogu biti razlog za zabrinutost u vezi sa zaštitom potrošača.
In particular, an acute consumer risk could not be excluded even by a refined risk assessment, taking into account a processing factor for citrus fruit.
Naime, čak ni podrobnom procjenom rizika ne može se isključiti mogućnost akutnog rizika za potrošače ako se uzme u obzir faktor prerade agruma.
The European Commission and the Member States represented in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed considered it an appropriate risk management decision to lower the MRLs to a level that has been demonstrated to be safe for European consumers.
Europska komisija i države članice zastupljene u Stalnom odboru za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje smatraju snižavanje MRO-ova na razinu koja se pokazala sigurnom za europske potrošače primjerenom odlukom o upravljanju rizikom.
In accordance with Article 6(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 an application was submitted for guazatine used on citrus fruits.
U skladu s člankom 6. stavcima 2. i 4. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 podnesen je zahtjev za uporabu gvazatina na agrumima.
In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 this application was evaluated by the Member State concerned and the evaluation report was forwarded to the Commission.
U skladu s člankom 8. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 taj su zahtjev ocijenile predmetne države članice i Komisiji dostavile izvješće o ocjeni.
The Authority assessed the application and the evaluation report, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and, where relevant, to animals and gave a reasoned opinion on the proposed MRLs [3].
Agencija je ocijenila zahtjev i izvješće o ocjeni, posebno ispitujući rizike za potrošače i, prema potrebi, za životinje te je dala obrazloženo mišljenje o predloženim MRO-ovima [3].
It forwarded this opinion to the Commission and the Member States and made it available to the public.
To je mišljenje dostavila Komisiji i državama članicama te ga učinila dostupnim javnosti.
It concluded in the opinion that it does not recommend setting the proposed MRLs since the available data were not sufficient to exclude a risk for European consumers.
U svojem mišljenju zaključila je da ne preporučuje utvrđivanje predloženih MRO-ova jer dostupni podaci nisu dostatni da se isključi mogućnost rizika za europske potrošače.
The applicant requested an administrative review of the Authority's reasoned opinion according to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Podnositelj zahtjeva zatražio je administrativno preispitivanje obrazloženog mišljenja Agencije u skladu s člankom 13. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005.
This review led to the conclusion that no substantial flaws and errors of assessment on the part of the Authority were identified.
Tim je preispitivanjem zaključeno da nisu utvrđeni značajni nedostaci i pogreške u procjeni koju je provela Agencija.
In order to allow for the normal marketing, processing and consumption of products, this Regulation should provide for a transitional arrangement for products which have been lawfully produced before the modification of the MRLs and for which information shows that a high level of consumer protection is maintained.
Kako bi se omogućilo uobičajeno stavljanje na tržište, prerada i potrošnja proizvoda, ovom Uredbom trebalo bi utvrditi prijelazne odredbe za proizvode koji su zakonito proizvedeni prije izmjene MRO-ova i za koje postoje informacije kojima se pokazuje da je zadržana visoka razina zaštite potrošača.
The transitional arrangement provided for by this Regulation should take the concerns of consumer protection with the existing MRLs for guazatine in grapefruit and oranges into account.
U prijelaznim odredbama utvrđenima ovom Uredbom trebalo bi uzeti u obzir zabrinutost u vezi sa zaštitom potrošača u pogledu postojećih MRO-ova za gvazatin u grejpu i narančama.
A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before the modified MRLs become applicable in order to permit Member States, third countries and food business operators to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the modification of the MRLs.
Državama članicama, trećim zemljama i subjektima u poslovanju s hranom trebalo bi ostaviti razuman rok prije početka primjene izmijenjenih MRO-ova kako bi se mogli pripremiti za ispunjavanje novih uvjeta koji proizlaze iz izmjene MRO-ova.
Annexes III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilozi III. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 mijenjaju se u skladu s Prilogom ovoj Uredbi.
As regards guazatine, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to all products which were lawfully produced before 13 May 2016, except grapefruit and oranges.
U pogledu gvazatina Uredba (EZ) br. 396/2005 kako je glasila prije nego što je izmijenjena ovom Uredbom nastavlja se primjenjivati na sve proizvode koji su zakonito proizvedeni prije 13. svibnja 2016., osim na grejp i naranče.
However, it shall apply from 13 May 2016.
Međutim, primjenjuje se od 13. svibnja 2016.
European Food Safety Authority; Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for guazatine according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EFSA Journal 2013;11(5):3239.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane; Obrazloženo mišljenje o pregledu postojećih maksimalnih razina ostataka (MRO) za gvazatin u skladu s člankom 12. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005, EFSA Journal 2013.; 11(5):3239.
[20 pp.].
[20 str.].
[29 pp.].
[29 str.].
Annexes III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are amended as follows:
Prilozi III. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 mijenjaju se kako slijedi:
in Annex III, the column for guazatine is deleted;
U Prilogu III. briše se stupac koji se odnosi na gvazatin.
in Annex V, the following column for guazatine is added:
U Prilogu V. dodaje se sljedeći stupac koji se odnosi na gvazatin:
Guazatine (guazatine acetate, sum of components)
Gvazatin (gvazatin acetat, zbroj komponenti)
European Food Safety Authority; Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for guazatine in citrus fruits. EFSA Journal 2014;12(8):3818.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane; Obrazloženo mišljenje o izmjeni postojećih MRO-ova za gvazatin u agrumima, EFSA Journal 2014.; 12(8):3818.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1911
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1911