natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
After provisional disclosure, the complainant claimed that some exporting producers had started absorbing the imposed provisional duties by refusing to increase its prices.
Nakon privremene objave podnositelj zahtjeva tvrdio je da su neki proizvođači izvoznici počeli apsorbirati uvedene privremene pristojbe tako što su odbili povećati svoje cijene.
This claim cannot be verified in the framework of this investigation.
Ta se tvrdnja ne može provjeriti u okviru ovog ispitnog postupka.
Should a separate anti-absorption request be filed, a review under Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation could be initiated, if prima facie evidence is provided.
Bude li podnesen zasebni antiapsorpcijski zahtjev, mogla bi se pokrenuti revizija na temelju članka 12. stavka 1. Osnovne uredbe, ako budu dostavljeni dokazi prima facie.
The measures provided for in this regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Mjere predviđene ovom uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog člankom 15. stavkom 1.Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036,
A definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, or other alloy steel but excluding of stainless steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated and not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), currently falling within CN ex72091500 (TARIC code 7209150090), 72091690, 72091790, 72091891, ex72091899 (TARIC code 7209189990), ex72092500 (TARIC code 7209250090), 72092690, 72092790, 72092890, 72112330, ex72112380 (TARIC codes 7211238019, 7211238095 and 7211238099), ex72112900 (TARIC codes 7211290019 and 7211290099), 72255080 and 72269200 and originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation.
Konačna antidampinška pristojba uvodi se na uvoz plosnatih valjanih proizvoda od željeza ili nelegiranog čelika ili ostalih legiranih čelika osim nehrđajućeg čelika, svih širina, hladnovaljanih (hladnoreduciranih) koji nisu platirani niti prevučeni i samo su hladnovaljani i dalje neobrađeni (hladnoreducirani), trenutačno obuhvaćenih oznakama KN ex72091500 (oznaka TARIC 7209150090), 72091690, 72091790, 72091891, ex72091899 (oznaka TARIC 7209189990), ex72092500 (oznaka TARIC 7209250090), 72092690, 72092790, 72092890, 72112330, ex72112380 (oznake TARIC 7211238019, 7211238095 i 7211238099), ex72112900 (oznake TARIC 7211290019 i 7211290099), 72255080 i 72269200 i podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopa konačne antidampinške pristojbe primjenjive na neto cijenu franko granica Unije, neocarinjeno, proizvoda opisanog u stavku 1. koji su proizvela društva navedena u nastavku iznosi:
PAO Severstal, Cherepovets
PAO Severstal, Čerepovec
The application of the individual anti-dumping duty rates specified for the companies mentioned in paragraph 2 shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, on which shall appear a declaration dated and signed by an official of the entity issuing such invoice, identified by his/her name and function, drafted as follows: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of cold rolled flat steel products sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in the (country concerned). I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’ If no such invoice is presented, the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’ shall apply.
Primjena pojedinačnih stopa antidampinških pristojbi utvrđenih za društva navedena u stavku 2. uvjetovana je podnošenjem carinskim tijelima država članica valjanoga trgovačkog računa na kojem se nalazi datirana izjava koju je potpisao službenik tijela koje je izdalo račun, uz navođenje njegova imena i prezimena te funkcije, formulirana kako slijedi: „Ja, niže potpisani, potvrđujem da je (obujam) hladnovaljanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda koji se prodaju za izvoz u Europsku uniju, obuhvaćen ovim računom, proizveo (naziv društva i adresa) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) u (predmetna zemlja). Izjavljujem da su podaci na ovom računu potpuni i točni.” Ako se takav račun ne predoči, primjenjuje se stopa pristojbe koja vrijedi za „sva ostala društva”.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/181 shall be definitively collected.
Konačno se naplaćuju iznosi osigurani privremenim antidampinškim pristojbama na temelju Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/181.
The amounts secured in excess of the definitive rates of anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Oslobađaju se iznosi osigurani iznad konačnih stopa antidampinške pristojbe.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
SL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/181 of 10 February 2016 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation (OJ L 37, 12.2.2016, p. 1).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/181 od 10. veljače 2016. o uvođenju privremene antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenih hladnovaljanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije (SL L 37, 12.2.2016., str. 1.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2325 of 11 December 2015 making imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation subject to registration (OJ L 328, 12.12.2015, p. 104).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2325 od 11. prosinca 2015. o uvjetovanju evidentiranjem uvoza određenih hladnovaljanih plosnatih proizvoda od čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije (SL L 328, 12.12.2015., str. 104.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1329 of 29 July 2016 levying the definitive anti-dumping duty on the registered imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation (see page 27 of this Official Journal).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1329 od 29. srpnja 2016. o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na registrirani uvoz određenih hladnovaljanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije (Vidjeti stranicu 27. ovoga Službenog lista).
Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 of 22 December 2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in India and the Republic of Korea (OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 17).
SL L 332, 28.12.2000., str. 17.
The company notified the Commission that in accordance with changes in Russian law, it changed its legal form from Open Joint Stock Company (OJSC) to Public Joint Stock Company (PJSC).
Društvo je obavijestilo Komisiju da je, u skladu s promjenama u ruskom pravu, svoj pravni oblik promijenilo iz otvorenog dioničkog društva (engl. open joint stock company, OJSC) u javno dioničko društvo (engl. public joint stock company, PJSC).
This change has been effective since 1 January 2016.
Ta je promjena stupila na snagu 1. siječnja 2016.
Case C-315/90, Gimelec and Others v Commission, judgment 27 November 1991, EU:C:1991:447, para. 23.
Predmet C-315/90, Gimelec i drugi protiv Komisije, presuda, 27. studenoga 1991., EU:C:1991:447, točka 23.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3262/90 of 5 November 1990 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of audio tapes in cassettes originating in Japan, the Republic of Korea and Hong Kong (OJ L 313, 13.11.1990, p. 5).
Uredba Komisije (EEZ) br. 3262/90 оd 5. studenoga 1990. o uvođenju privremene antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz audiovrpca u kazetama podrijetlom iz Japana, Republike Koreje i Hong Konga (SL L 313, 13.11.1990., str. 5.).
Case T-210/95 European Fertiliser Manufacturer's Association (EFMA) v Council [1999] ECR II-3291.
Predmet T-210/95 Europsko udruženje proizvođača umjetnih gnojiva (EFMA) protiv Vijeća [1999.] ECR II-3291.
Council Regulation (EC) No 437/2004 of 8 March 2004 imposing definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of large rainbow trout originating in Norway and the Faeroe Islands (OJ L 72, 11.3.2004, p. 23).
SL L 72, 11.3.2004., str. 23.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, 1049 Brussels, Belgium.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, 1049 Brussels, Belgija.
Chinese cooperating exporting producers not sampled
Kineski proizvođači izvoznici koji surađuju, ali nisu uključeni u uzorak:
Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang
Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang
Handan Iron & Steel Group Han-Bao Co., Ltd, Handan
Handan Iron & Steel Group Han-Bao Co., Ltd., Handan
Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd, Shanghai
Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Shanghai
Shanghai Meishan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd, Nanjing
Shanghai Meishan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Nanjing
BX Steel POSCO Cold Rolled Sheet Co., Ltd, Benxi
BX Steel POSCO Cold Rolled Sheet Co., Ltd., Benxi
WISCO International Economic & Trading Co. Ltd, Wuhan
WISCO International Economic & Trading Co. Ltd., Wuhan
Maanshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd, Maanshan
Maanshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Maanshan
Tianjin Rolling-one Steel Co., Ltd, Tianjin
Tianjin Rolling-one Steel Co., Ltd., Tianjin
Zhangjiagang Yangtze River Cold Rolled Sheet Co., Ltd, Zhangjiagang
Zhangjiagang Yangtze River Cold Rolled Sheet Co., Ltd., Zhangjiagang
Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Union Co., Ltd, Baotou City
Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Union Co., Ltd., Baotou City
Bearing in mind that the data on file for the period 2009 to the investigation period was clearly not appropriate due to the significant presence of low priced and dumped imports and the 2009 financial crises which impacted the steel sector also in 2010 and 2011, it was evident that the Commission had reasonable grounds to go further back in time (if data was available) in order to identify the most recent representative year and that the period 2005-2008 should therefore be examined.
Uzimajući u obzir činjenicu da podaci u spisu za razdoblje od 2009. do razdoblja ispitnog postupka očito nisu bili primjereni zbog znatne prisutnosti jeftinog dampinškog uvoza i financijske krize 2009. koja je utjecala na sektor čelika i 2010. i 2011., bilo je jasno da je Komisija imala opravdane razloge vratiti se dalje u prošlost (ako su podaci bili dostupni) kako bi utvrdila posljednju reprezentativnu godinu te da se stoga trebalo ispitati razdoblje od 2005. do 2008.
It was concluded from the data available that the year 2008 was the most appropriate year for the reasons stated above.
Iz dostupnih je podataka zaključeno da je 2008. bila najprimjerenija godina zbog prethodno navedenih razloga.
The claim that this constitutes ‘cherry picking’ is baseless since the year 2008 was by no means the highest profit year from the period 2005-2008.
Tvrdnja da se na taj način „biraju samo najpovoljnije opcije” nije utemeljena jer 2008. ni u kojem slučaju nije bila najprofitabilnija godina u razdoblju od 2005. do 2008.
2008 was selected as it was the most recent year with normal conditions of competition.
Odabrana je 2008. jer je to bila posljednja godina s uobičajenim uvjetima tržišnog natjecanja.
The same exporting producers claimed that, as indicated in recital 122 above, the Commission had disregarded events that took place in 2010 from its analysis of the situation of the Union industry on the ground that they took place before the period of analysis whereas it resorted to the year 2008 to determine target profit.
Isti su proizvođači izvoznici tvrdili da je, kako je navedeno u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 122., Komisija u svojoj analizi stanja industrije Unije zanemarila događaje iz 2010. uz objašnjenje da je do njih došlo prije razdoblja analize, ali je upotrijebila 2008. kako bi odredila ciljnu dobit.
In this regard, it is noted that while the period considered for the analysis of the situation of the Union industry was limited to the period from 2011 to the investigation period, as defined in recital 20 of the provisional Regulation, there are no legal boundaries that prevent the Commission from reverting to periods outside the period considered in order to establish a reasonable target profit, as long as the period chosen is representative of the profit level that could be achieved in the absence of dumped imports.
U tom se pogledu napominje da, iako je razdoblje razmatrano za analizu stanja industrije Unije bilo ograničeno na razdoblje od 2011. do razdoblja ispitnog postupka, kako je definirano u uvodnoj izjavi 20. Privremene uredbe, ne postoje pravna ograničenja zbog kojih se Komisija ne bi mogla okrenuti razdobljima izvan razmatranog razdoblja kako bi utvrdila razumnu ciljnu dobit dok je god odabrano razdoblje reprezentativno za razinu dobiti koja bi se ostvarila da nema dampinškog uvoza.
One interested party indicated that the so-called lesser-duty rule was not adequate to remove the injury to the Union industry in the present case on the grounds that while the cost of production of the Union industry remained stable after the investigation period, import prices from the Russia and China decreased respectively by 19 % and 22 % from April to December 2015.
Jedna je zainteresirana strana navela da takozvano pravilo niže pristojbe nije primjereno za uklanjanje štete za industriju Unije u ovom slučaju jer je trošak proizvodnje industrije Unije ostao stabilan nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka iako su se cijene uvoza iz Rusije i Kine smanjile za 19 % odnosno 22 % od travnja do prosinca 2015.
On this basis, it claimed that the respective level of the provisional anti-dumping duties (26,2 % and 16 %) was insufficient as the duties were already largely or fully absorbed by the abovementioned price decreases.
Na temelju toga tvrdila je da je odgovarajuća razina privremenih antidampinških pristojbi (26,2 % i 16 %) nedovoljna jer su te pristojbe već uglavnom ili u cijelosti apsorbirane prethodno navedenim sniženjima cijena.
On the other hand, while import prices from the countries concerned have indeed decreased significantly since the end of the investigation period, there are several indications that import prices are again increasing in the second quarter of 2016.
S druge strane, iako su se cijene uvoza iz predmetnih zemalja doista znatno smanjile nakon isteka razdoblja ispitnog postupka, postoji nekoliko naznaka da se uvozne cijene ponovo povećavaju u drugom tromjesečju 2016.
Therefore, the decrease in sales prices does not appear to be of a lasting nature and it would therefore be premature to treat it as such.
Stoga se čini da smanjenje prodajnih cijena nije trajne prirode i da bi ga bilo prerano takvim smatrati.
Angang Group
Grupa Angang
Shougang Group
Grupa Shougang
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1329
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1329
levying the definitive anti-dumping duty on the registered imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na evidentirani uvoz određenih hladno valjanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 8. lipnja 2016. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije [1] („Osnovna uredba”), a posebno članak 10. stavak 4.,
On 14 May 2015, following a complaint by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’), the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the Union of certain flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, or other alloy steel but excluding of stainless steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated and not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced) (‘cold-rolled flat steel products’ or ‘CRFS’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’) and the Russian Federation (‘Russia’) (together, referred to as ‘the countries concerned’) on the basis of Article 5 of the basic Regulation.
Europska komisija („Komisija”) pokrenula je 14. svibnja 2015. antidampinški ispitni postupak u pogledu uvoza u Uniju određenih plosnatih valjanih proizvoda od željeza ili nelegiranog čelika ili ostalih legiranih čelika osim nehrđajućeg čelika, svih širina, hladno valjanih (hladno reduciranih) koji nisu platirani niti prevučeni i samo su hladno valjani (hladno reducirani) i dalje neobrađeni, („hladno valjani plosnati proizvodi od čelika”) podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine („NRK”) i Ruske Federacije („Rusija”) (zajedno dalje u tekstu „predmetne zemlje”) na temelju članka 5. Osnovne uredbe, nakon zahtjeva koji je podnijela Europska federacija proizvođača željeza („Eurofer” ili „podnositelj zahtjeva”).
The complainant submitted a request for registration pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation on 12 November 2015.
Podnositelj zahtjeva dostavio je 12. studenoga 2015. zahtjev za evidentiranje u skladu s člankom 14. stavkom 5. Osnovne uredbe.
The Commission, by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2325 [2] (the ‘registration Regulation’), made the imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation subject to registration.
Na temelju Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2325 [2] („Uredba o evidentiranju”) uvoz određenih hladno valjanih plosnatih proizvoda od čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije podliježe evidentiranju.
By Article 1(2) of that Regulation, all interested parties were invited to make their views known in writing, to provide supporting evidence or to request to be heard within a fixed deadline.
Člankom 1. stavkom 2. te Uredbe sve zainteresirane stranke pozvane su izraziti svoje stavove u pisanom obliku, dostaviti odgovarajuće dokaze ili podnijeti zahtjev za održavanje rasprave u utvrđenom roku.
Comments on the registration were received from the complainant, the China Iron & Steel Association (CISA), the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, Russian exporting producers, importers and/or users.
Primjedbe o evidentiranju zaprimljene su od podnositelja zahtjeva, Kineskog udruženja za željezo i čelik (CISA), Ministarstva gospodarskog razvoja Ruske Federacije, ruskih proizvođača izvoznika, uvoznika i/ili korisnika.
By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/181 [3], the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation.
Komisija je Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) 2016/181 [3] uvela privremenu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz određenih hladno valjanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije.
The Commission's final analysis and determination with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest are detailed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 [4] (‘definitive Regulation’).
Konačna analiza i odluka Komisije o dampingu, šteti, uzročnosti i interesu Unije detaljno su navedene u Provedbenoj uredbi Komisije (EU) 2016/1328 [4] („Uredba o konačnoj pristojbi”).
The present regulation only addresses the issue of registration, the comments received in relation to registration and retroactive levying of the anti-dumping duty in question.
Ova se Uredba odnosi samo na evidentiranje, zaprimljene primjedbe o evidentiranju i retroaktivno uvođenje predmetne antidampinške pristojbe.
Procedure with regard to retroactivity after the imposition of provisional measures
Postupak u pogledu retroaktivnosti nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera
In order to examine whether the retroactive application of the definitive duties was warranted, the Commission analysed consumption, prices, imports and sales volumes prior and subsequent to the opening of the investigation.
Kako bi ispitala opravdanost retroaktivne primjene konačnih pristojbi Komisija je analizirala potrošnju, cijene, obujam uvoza i prodaje prije i nakon pokretanja ispitnog postupka.
In order to verify the questionnaires replies mentioned in recital 5 above, on-spot verification visits were carried out of the data submitted by the following parties:
Radi provjere odgovora na pitanja iz upitnika navedenih u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi (5), tijekom posjeta na terenu provjereni su podaci koje su dostavile sljedeće stranke:
ArcelorMittal Sagunto SL, Puerto de Sagunto, Spain
ArcelorMittal Sagunto S.L., Puerto de Sagunto, Španjolska
Unrelated importers/users
nepovezani uvoznici/korisnici
Duferco SA, Lugano, Switzerland
Duferco SA, Lugano, Švicarska
Marcegaglia Carbon Steel, Mantova, Italy
Marcegaglia Carbon Steel, Mantova, Italija
On 3 May 2016 a hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings was held at the request of Eurofer.
Na dan 3. svibnja 2016. na zahtjev Eurofera održano je saslušanje pred službenikom za saslušanja u trgovinskim postupcima.
This hearing was held within the framework of the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain cold rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation and one of the issues raised was the possible retroactive collection of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Saslušanje je održano u okviru antidampinškog postupka u vezi s uvozom određenih hladno valjanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije i jedno se pitanje odnosilo na moguću retroaktivnu naplatu konačne antidampinške pristojbe.
On the request of importers, the Commission services also held two hearings regarding the issue of retroactive collection of the anti-dumping duty.
Na zahtjev uvoznika službe Komisije održale su i dva saslušanja u vezi s pitanjem retroaktivne naplate antidampinške pristojbe.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to levy a definitive anti-dumping duty on the registered imports of CRFS (‘the additional disclosure’).
Komisija je sve stranke obavijestila o osnovnim činjenicama i razlozima na temelju kojih je namjeravala uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na evidentirani uvoz hladno valjanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda („dodatna objava”).
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the additional disclosure.
Svim je strankama odobreno razdoblje za podnošenje primjedbi o dodatnoj objavi.
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Primjedbe zainteresiranih stranaka razmatrane su i uzete u obzir kada je to bilo primjereno.
Following the additional disclosure, several parties submitted comments.
Nakon dodatne objave nekoliko je stranaka dostavilo svoje primjedbe.
On 15 June 2016, one group of importers had a hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Na dan 15. lipnja 2016. jedna je skupina uvoznika saslušana pred službenikom za saslušanja u trgovinskim postupcima.
Following this hearing, one interested party submitted comments to the post-hearing submission.
Nakon tog saslušanja jedna je zainteresirana stranka dostavila svoje primjedbe.
B. RETROACTIVE LEVYING OF ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES
B. RETROAKTIVNO UVOĐENJE ANTIDAMPINŠKE PRISTOJBE
General principles for registration and retroactive levying of anti-dumping duties
Opća načela evidentiranja i retroaktivnog uvođenja antidampinških pristojbi