natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Certain interested parties challenged the stockpiling argument claiming that the finding of stockpiling was not supported by evidence.
Određene zainteresirane stranke osporile su argument o stvaranju zaliha, tvrdeći da nalaz o stvaranju zaliha nije potkrijepljen dokazima.
However, it is clear that imports post investigation period increased substantially as compared to pre initiation levels and that cooperating importers and/or users reported increases in stocks.
Međutim, jasno je da se nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka uvoz značajno povećao u usporedbi s razinama prije pokretanja postupka i da su uvoznici i/ili korisnici koji surađuju prijavili povećanje zaliha.
In addition, the cold rolled market is characterised by imports by both traders and final users.
Osim toga, obilježje je tržišta hladno valjanih proizvoda da se uvozom bave i trgovci i krajnji korisnici.
Despite the fact that prices were falling in the months following the initiation of this investigation the traders and users were motivated to increase their monthly average import levels and stock levels, which they did.
Unatoč činjenici da su u mjesecima nakon pokretanja ovog ispitnog postupka cijene padale, trgovci i korisnici bili su motivirani za povećanje svojih prosječnih mjesečnih razina uvoza i zaliha te su to i učinili.
Therefore, it is clear that stockpiling took place.
Stoga je jasno da je došlo do stvaranja zaliha.
One group of importers claimed that it had provided evidence that the level of its stocks showed a decreasing trend and that its purchases in the period following the initiation were not aimed at stockpiling.
Jedna skupina uvoznika tvrdila da je dostavila dokaze da je razina njezinih zaliha pokazala trend smanjivanja i da cilj njezinih kupnji u razdoblju nakon pokretanja postupka nije bio stvaranje zaliha.
The same interested party claimed that the periods for comparing the level of stock were not appropriate as stocks at the end of 2014 were abnormally low in view of the banks' unwillingness to finance stocks.
Ista zainteresirana stranka tvrdila je da razdoblja za usporedbu razina zaliha nisu primjerena jer su zalihe na kraju 2014. bile iznimno niske zbog nevoljkosti banaka da financiraju zalihe.
Eventually it claimed that the Commission has not demonstrated that the goods concerned are still in stock and indicated that it expected that the material purchased in the registration period would be sold before provisional measures were imposed.
Na kraju je tvrdila da Komisija nije dokazala da je predmetna roba i dalje u zalihama, navodeći kako očekuje da će roba kupljena u razdoblju evidentiranja biti prodana prije uvođenja privremenih mjera.
In this regard, it is first noted that the assessment with regard to the level of stock may show individual differences among the companies importing the product concerned.
U tom se pogledu prvo napominje da procjena u pogledu razine zaliha može pokazati pojedinačne razlike među poduzećima koja uvoze predmetni proizvod.
However the Commission's assessment shall not be limited to individual companies and the information on the file, including that of this group of importers, shows that there was increase by 22 %.
Međutim Komisijina procjena nije ograničena na pojedinačna poduzeća i informacije u spisu, uključujući i to da ta skupina uvoznika pokazuje da je povećanje iznosilo 22 %.
Second it is noted that this claim is not substantiated by supporting evidence as far as banks or the volumes on stock are concerned.
Drugo, potrebno je napomenuti da zahtjev nije potkrijepljen popratnim dokazima u vezi s bankama i obujmom zaliha.
Should the claim regarding the availability of finance still be true, the Commission wonders how importers could finance the significant increase in imports that took place after the initiation of the investigation without the availability of finance.
Ako se tvrdnje o raspoloživosti financiranja pokažu točnima, Komisija se pita kako bi uvoznici bez raspoloživih financijskih sredstava mogli financirati značajno povećanje uvoza do kojeg je došlo nakon pokretanja ispitnog postupka.
On the basis of the above, these claims have to be rejected.
Na temelju navedenoga te tvrdnje treba odbaciti.
On the basis of the above, the Commission concludes that the substantial rise in imports subsequent to the investigation period has seriously undermined the remedial effect of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Na temelju navedenog Komisija zaključuje da je značajno povećanje uvoza nakon ispitnog razdoblja ozbiljno ugrozilo korektivni učinak konačne antidampinške pristojbe.
Several Russian exporting producers submitted that Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation does not indicate support for a cumulative assessment as regards the conditions stipulated in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation.
Nekoliko ruskih proizvođača izvoznika iznijelo je tvrdnju da se, u svjetlu uvjeta navedenih u njemu, u članku 10. stavku 4. Osnovne uredbe ne upućuje na potporu kumulativnoj procjeni.
They further submitted that in their view conditions for retroactive imposition of anti-dumping duties are not fulfilled as far as Russian imports of CRFS are concerned.
Osim toga su ustvrdili kako smatraju da nisu ispunjeni uvjeti za retroaktivno uvođenje antidampinških pristojbi u pogledu uvoza ruskih hladno valjanih plosnatih proizvoda od čelika.
Without a reference in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation to cumulative assessment, there would be no legal basis for the Commission to retro-actively apply definitive anti-dumping duties on imports from Russia.
Tako da, u nedostatku upućivanja na kumulativnu procjenu u sklopu članka 10. stavka 4. Osnovne uredbe, Komisija ne bi imala pravni temelj za retroaktivnu primjenu konačnih antidampinških pristojbi na uvoz iz Rusije.
In this light, reference was also made to the fundamental principle of non-discrimination.
U tom se smislu ukazuje i na temeljno načelo nediskriminacije.
It needs to be reiterated that the Commission does not agree with the argument that the conditions as stipulated in Article 10(4) are not met.
Potrebno je ponoviti da se Komisija ne slaže s tvrdnjom da nisu ispunjeni uvjeti iz članka 10. stavka 4.
In this case, it is underlined that in both the cumulative assessment of the countries concerned as well as in the individual assessment of the countries concerned, the conditions of Article 10(4) are met for both countries.
Naglašava se da su u ovom predmetu i u kumulativnoj i u pojedinačnoj procjeni predmetnih zemalja ispunjeni uvjeti iz članka 10. stavka 4. za obje zemlje.
Various interested parties submitted that due to the registration, importers and/or users found themselves in a situation of legal uncertainty and that this has had a detrimental impact on the business of importers and/or users.
Razne zainteresirane stranke iznijele su tvrdnju da su se zbog evidentiranja uvoznici i/ili korisnici našli u stanju pravne nesigurnosti te da je to imalo poguban učinak na poslovanje uvoznika i/ili korisnika.
They further submitted that a retroactive imposition of anti-dumping duties on registered imports would further exacerbate the detrimental effect on Union importers and/or users, who reasonably relied on their suppliers, under the assumption that they are not involved in dumping.
Još su ustvrdile da bi retroaktivno uvođenje antidampinških pristojbi na evidentirani uvoz dodatno pojačalo pogubni učinak na uvoznike i/ili korisnike iz Unije, koji su se s razlogom pouzdavali u svoje dobavljače pod pretpostavkom da ne sudjeluju u dampingu.
It was further argued that the retroactive measures would hurt importers and/or users as regards imports linked to contracts concluded before the initiation of the proceeding.
Iznesena je i tvrdnja da bi retroaktivne mjere naštetile uvoznicima i/ili korisnicima u pogledu uvoza povezanog s ugovorima sklopljenim prije pokretanja postupka.
In this regard, the Commission firstly notes that the right of the investigating authority to register imports when certain conditions are met, is stipulated in the basic Regulation under which this investigation was initiated and that it proceeds with registration only in exceptional cases as it interprets the legal conditions, as set out in Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, strictly.
U tom pogledu Komisija najprije navodi da je pravo tijela koje provodi ispitni postupak da evidentira uvoz kad se ispune određeni uvjeti navedeni u Osnovnoj uredbi, na temelju koje je ispitni postupak i pokrenut, i da ono nastavlja evidentiranje samo u iznimnim slučajevima u skladu sa svojim strogim tumačenjem pravnih uvjeta iz članka 14. stavka. 5. Osnovne uredbe.
As already explained, the Commission considers that in this case the conditions for registration were clearly met.
Kao što je već objašnjeno, Komisija smatra da su u ovom predmetu nedvojbeno ispunjeni uvjeti za evidentiranje.
Secondly, the actual registration only took place seven months after the initiation of this investigation.
Kao drugo, stvarno evidentiranje dogodilo se tek sedam mjeseci poslije pokretanja ispitnog postupka.
Therefore, it relates to imports that have been made under the full knowledge of an on-going anti-dumping investigation and the resulting possibility of imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Stoga se ono odnosi na uvoz ostvaren uz punu svijest o tome da je u tijeku antidampinški ispitni postupak i da je zbog toga moguće uvođenje antidampinških pristojbi.
Furthermore, the Commission underlines that the basic Regulation as well as the WTO ADA allow for an eventual retroactive application of anti-dumping measures if certain conditions are met.
Komisija usto naglašava da i Osnovna uredba i WTO ADA dopuštaju mogućnost retroaktivne primjene antidampinških mjera ako se ispune određeni uvjeti.
In view of the above, the Commission does not contest that registration of imports as such may bring certain legal uncertainty to importers and/or users concerned as it is not automatically resulting in a retroactive collection of the definitive duties, if any.
S obzirom na navedeno, Komisija ne spori činjenicu da evidentiranje uvoza može kod predmetnih uvoznika i/ili korisnika izazvati određenu pravnu nesigurnost jer ne dovodi automatski do retroaktivnog uvođenja antidampinških pristojbi.
The Commission neither contests that if duties are eventually levied retroactively on registered imports, this may negatively affect parties that have imported the subject merchandise during the two months period of registration, which ended with the imposition of provisional duties.
Komisija ne spori ni činjenicu da retroaktivno uvođenje pristojbi na evidentirani uvoz može imati negativni učinak na stranke koje su uvezle predmetnu robu tijekom dvomjesečnog razdoblja evidentiranja koje je završilo uvođenjem privremenih pristojbi.
However, the Commission recalls that the purpose of registration is to avoid the undermining of the remedial effect of duties, which could occur, for example, by significant imports during registration, following a substantial increase in imports and stock-piling that already took place prior to registration.
No, Komisija podsjeća da je svrha evidentiranja sprečavanje ugroze korektivnog učinka pristojbi koju bi, na primjer, mogao izazvati značajan uvoz tijekom evidentiranja, nakon značajnog povećanja uvoza i stvaranja zaliha u razdoblju prije evidentiranja.
Where registration remains ineffective, because operators ignore the warning in the form of registration, it is necessary to retroactively apply duties in order to ensure that the remedial effect of duties is not further delayed due to imports that take place after registration.
Ako evidentiranje ostane bez učinka zato što subjekti zanemare upozorenje u obliku evidentiranja, retroaktivna primjena pristojbi neophodna je kako bi se osiguralo da se korektivni učinak pristojbi još dodatno ne odgađa zbog uvoza ostvarenog nakon evidentiranja.
It is likely that in respect of this case a number of importers and/or users, aware of the clear warning that retroactive duties may be imposed, stopped importing but that others decided to take the risk.
Vjerojatno je da je u ovom predmetu više uvoznika i/ili korisnika, svjesno jasnog upozorenja da mogu biti uvedene retroaktivne pristojbe, prestalo uvoziti, no drugi su odlučili riskirati.
The Commission therefore is satisfied that it has not breached the principle of legal certainty.
Komisija stoga smatra da nije prekršila načelo pravne sigurnosti.
In addition, where dumping stops after registration, importers can request the refund of duties paid.
Osim toga, ako nakon evidentiranja prestane damping, uvoznici mogu zatražiti povrat plaćenih pristojbi.
Conclusion on retroactive levying
Zaključak o retroaktivnom uvođenju pristojbi
Pursuant to Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation, anti-dumping duties may be levied retro-actively, provided that imports have been registered in accordance with Article 14(5), the Commission has given the importers concerned an opportunity to comment whether the criteria laid down in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation are met.
U skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 4. Osnovne uredbe, antidampinške pristojbe mogu se uvesti retroaktivno, pod uvjetom da je uvoz evidentiran u skladu s člankom 14. stavkom 5. Komisija je predmetnim uvoznicima omogućila da se očituju o tome jesu li ispunjeni kriteriji iz članka 10. stavka 4. Osnovne uredbe.
These large and low priced quantities of the product concerned have already had a further negative bearing on the prices and Union market share of the Union industry.
Te velike i jeftine količine predmetnog proizvoda već su se dodatno negativno odrazile na cijene i na udio Unijine industrije na Unijinu tržištu.
As the import volumes, combined with the above described pricing behaviour and the market share developments are substantial and come on top of significantly increased stocks, the imports that were imported after registration are likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Budući da je obujam uvoza, zajedno s već opisanim ponašanjem u pogledu određivanja cijena i kretanjima tržišnih udjela, iznimno važan i da se njime povećavaju ionako značajno povećane zalihe, uvoz ostvaren nakon evidentiranja vjerojatno će ozbiljno ugroziti korektivni učinak konačne antidampinške pristojbe.
On this basis, the Commission concludes that the conditions as set out in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation for the retro-active application of the definitive anti-dumping duty are met.
Komisija na temelju toga zaključuje da su ispunjeni uvjeti iz članka 10. stavka 4. Osnovne uredbe o retroaktivnoj primjeni konačne antidampinške pristojbe.
A definitive anti-dumping duty should therefore be levied on the product concerned, which was made subject to registration by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2325.
Konačna antidampinška pristojba trebala bi biti uvedena za predmetni proizvod koji je bio podložan evidentiranju u skladu s Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2015/2325.
In accordance with article 10(3) of the basic Regulation, the level of the duty to be collected retroactively should be set at the level of the provisional duties imposed under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/181, to the extent that they are lower than the level of the definitive duties imposed under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328.
U skladu s člankom 10. stavkom 3. Osnovne uredbe, razinu carina koje se prikupljaju retroaktivno treba utvrditi na razini privremenih pristojbi uvedenih Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2016/181, u mjeri u kojoj su niže od razine konačnih pristojbi uvedenih Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2016/1328.
The Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 did not deliver an opinion,
Odbor osnovan člankom 15. stavkom 1. Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 nije dostavio mišljenje,
A definitive anti-dumping duty is levied on imports of flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, or other alloy steel but excluding of stainless steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated and not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), currently falling within CN ex72091500 (TARIC code 7209150090), 72091690, 72091790, 72091891, ex72091899 (TARIC code 7209189990), ex72092500 (TARIC code 7209250090), 72092690, 72092790, 72092890, 72112330, ex72112380 (TARIC codes 7211238019, 7211238095 and 7211238099), ex72112900 (TARIC codes 7211290019 and 7211290099), 72255080 and 72269200 and originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation, which have been registered by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2325.
Konačna antidampinška pristojba uvodi se na uvoz plosnatih valjanih proizvoda od željeza ili nelegiranog čelika, ili ostalih legiranih čelika osim nehrđajućeg čelika, svih širina, hladno valjanih (hladno reduciranih), koji nisu platirani niti prevučeni, hladno valjanih (hladno reduciranih) i dalje neobrađenih, obuhvaćenih oznakom KN ex72091500 (oznaka TARIC 7209150090), 72091690, 72091790, 72091891, ex72091899 (oznaka TARIC 7209189990), ex72092500 (oznaka TARIC 7209250090), 72092690, 72092790, 72092890, 72112330, ex72112380 (oznake TARIC 7211238019, 7211238095 i 7211238099), ex72112900 (oznake TARIC 7211290019 i 7211290099), 72255080 i 72269200 podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije, evidentiranih u Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) 2015/2325.
flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, of all width, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated, not further worked than cold-rolled, whether or not in coils, of all thickness, electrical,
plosnati valjani proizvodi od željeza ili nelegiranog čelika, svih širina, hladno valjani (hladno reducirani), koji nisu platirani niti prevučeni, hladno valjani i dalje neobrađeni, u kolutima ili nenamotani, svih debljina, električni,
flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, of all width, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated, in coils, of a thickness of less than 0,35 mm, annealed (known as ‘black plates’),
plosnati valjani proizvodi od željeza ili nelegiranog čelika, svih širina, hladno valjani (hladno reducirani), koji nisu platirani niti prevučeni, u kolutima, debljine manje od 0,35 mm, žareni (poznati i kao „crne ploče”),
flat-rolled products of other alloy steel, of all width, of silicon-electrical steel, and
plosnati valjani proizvodi od ostalih legiranih čelika, svih širina, od silicijskog elektročelika, i
flat-rolled products of alloy steel, not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), of high-speed steel.
plosnati valjani proizvodi od legiranog čelika, samo hladno valjani (hladno reducirani) i dalje neobrađeni, od brzoreznog čelika.
The rates of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stope konačne antidampinške pristojbe koje se primjenjuju na neto cijenu franko granica Unije, neocarinjeno, za proizvod opisan u stavku 1. koji proizvode društva navedena u nastavku jesu sljedeće:
Definitive duty rate (%)
Stopa konačne pristojbe ( %)
Tianjin Angang Tiantie Cold Rolled Sheets Co. Ltd, Tianjin
Tianjin Angang Tiantie Cold Rolled Sheets Co. Ltd., Tianjin
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2325 of 11 December 2015 making imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation subject to registration (OJ L 328, 12.12.2015, p. 104).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2325 оd 11. prosinca 2015. o uvjetovanju evidentiranjem uvoza određenih hladnovaljanih plosnatih proizvoda od čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije (SL L 328, 12.12.2015., str. 104.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/181 of 10 February 2016 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation (OJ L 37, 12.2.2016, p. 1).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/181 оd 10. veljače 2016. o uvođenju privremene antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenih hladnovaljanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije (SL L 37, 12.2.2016., str. 1.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 of 29 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain cold rolled flat steel products originating in the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation (see page 1 of this Official Journal).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1328 od 29. srpnja 2016. o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenih hladno valjanih plosnatih čeličnih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Ruske Federacije (vidjeti stranicu 1. ovoga Službenog lista).
COM(2016) 155 final of 16 March 2016
COM(2016) 155 final od 16. ožujka 2016.
Panel Report, US — Hot-Rolled Steel, para. 7.166.
Izvješće odbora, SAD – vruće valjani čelik, točka 7.166.
Registration of imports made under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation is another condition to levy the definitive duty retroactively.
Evidentiranje uvoza u skladu s člankom 14. stavkom 5. Osnovne uredbe drugi je uvjet za retroaktivno uvođenje konačne pristojbe.
As done in order to establish Union consumption at provisional stage (see recital 99 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/181), import volumes of the CN ex codes have been accounted fully to establish import volumes because the product concerned falls mostly in full CN codes.
Kao što je učinjeno da bi se utvrdila potrošnja u Uniji na privremenoj razini (vidjeti uvodnu izjavu (99) Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/181), za utvrđivanje obujma uvoza uzet je u obzir cjelokupni obujam uvoza oznaka KN ex jer predmetni proizvod većinom spada u potpune oznake KN.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429 of 26 August 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan (OJ L 224, 27.8.2015, p. 10).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1429 оd 26. kolovoza 2015. o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz hladno valjanih plosnatih proizvoda od nehrđajućeg čelika podrijetlom iz Narodne Republike Kine i Tajvana (SL L 224, 27.8.2015., str. 10.).
In the absence of more precise statistics and in order to ensure fair comparison with other statistical data sources, import statistics for the registration period were assessed on the basis of imports in December 2015 and January 2016.
U nedostatku preciznije statistike i radi osiguranja pravedne usporedbe s drugim izvorima statističkih podataka, statistike uvoza tijekom razdoblja evidentiranja procjenjivale su se na temelju uvoza u prosincu 2015. i siječnju 2016.
In the absence of more precise statistics and in order to ensure fair comparison with other statistical data, import statistics for the period from initiation to registration were assessed on the basis of imports from June to November 2015.
U nedostatku preciznije statistike i radi osiguranja pravedne usporedbe s drugim izvorima statističkih podataka, statistike uvoza tijekom razdoblja od pokretanja postupka do evidentiranja procjenjivale su se na temelju uvoza od lipnja do studenoga 2015.
In the framework of that analysis the Commission also sent questionnaires to importers and/or users of the product concerned concerning their import volumes, import prices and inventories in the period following the investigation period, i.e. from 1 April 2015 to 31 January 2016.
Komisija je u okviru te analize poslala i upitnike uvoznicima i/ili korisnicima predmetnog proizvoda s pitanjima o obujmu njihova uvoza, uvoznim cijenama i zalihama u razdoblju nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka, odnosno od 1. travnja 2015. do 31. siječnja 2016.
Replies were received from 22 unrelated and related importers and/or users.
Zaprimljeni su odgovori od 22 nepovezana i povezana uvoznika i/ili korisnika.
Furthermore, questionnaires were sent to the complainant and the five sampled Union producers concerning the sales in the period following the investigation period (‘IP’), i.e. from 1 April 2015 to 31 January 2016.
Upitnici su poslani i podnositelju zahtjeva i petorici proizvođača iz Unije iz uzorka s pitanjima o prodaji u razdoblju nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka, odnosno od 1. travnja 2015. do 31. siječnja 2016.