natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This assessment is not altered by the fact that the activities were left to the market prior to the State's activities, since it cannot matter whether the activity might be (or indeed was) pursued by a private operator [81].
Ocjenu ne mijenja činjenica da su te djelatnosti bile prisutne na tržištu prije no što ih je država počela obavljati jer ne bi smjelo biti važno bi li djelatnost mogao obavljati (ili ju je stvarno obavljao) privatni subjekt [81].
The Authority therefore concludes that the open nature of the website does not entail that the activities of NDLA are economic in nature.
Tijelo stoga zaključuje da javna priroda mrežnog mjesta ne podrazumijeva da su djelatnosti NDLA-a ekonomskog karaktera.
The legal status from ad hoc- to inter-municipal cooperation had no effect on the decision making process and cannot have an impact on the classification of the activities as non-economic
Promjena pravnog statusa iz ad hoc suradnje u međuopćinsku suradnju nije utjecala na postupak donošenja odluka i ne može utjecati na klasifikaciju djelatnosti kao neekonomske
In its judgment annulling the Decision the EFTA Court addressed several aspects relating not to the nature of the activity as such but rather to the organisational aspects of the NDLA, its financing and its autonomy.
U svojoj presudi o poništenju Odluke Sud EFTA-e iznio je nekoliko aspekata koji nisu povezani s karakterom djelatnosti kao takve, nego s ustrojstvom NDLA-a, njegovim financiranjem i samostalnosti.
These aspects relate to the practical implementation of the requirement to provide free learning materials and are addressed below.
Ti su aspekti povezani s provedbom zahtjeva za osiguranje besplatnih nastavnih materijala te su obrađeni u nastavku.
The change of legal status from ad hoc cooperation to a formal inter-municipal cooperation according to the Local Government Act Section 27 had no effect on the decision making process (nor did the change in the funding have any implications on the organisation of the NDLA).
Promjena pravnog status iz ad hoc suradnje u službenu međuopćinsku suradnju u skladu s člankom 27. Zakona o lokalnoj upravi nije utjecala na postupak donošenja odluka (niti je promjena načina financiranja imala posljedice na ustrojstvo NDLA-a).
The complainant has not alleged that the scope of the NDLA's activities changed from its ad hoc cooperation phase to its formal establishment as an inter-municipal cooperation.
Tužitelj nije tvrdio da se opseg djelatnosti NDLA-a promijenio iz faze ad hoc suradnje njegovim službenim osnivanjem kao međuopćinske suradnje.
Nevertheless, the EFTA Court points out that the lack of information about how the county authorities organised their cooperation to comply with their obligations to provide learning material in the NDLA ad hoc cooperation phase may have an impact on the classification of the activities as non-economic.
Međutim, Sud EFTA-e naglašava da nedostatak informacija o načinu na koji su okružne vlasti organizirale svoju suradnju kako bi ispunile svoje obveze dobavljanja nastavnih materijala u fazi ad hoc suradnje NDLA-a može utjecati na klasifikaciju djelatnosti kao neekonomske.
For that reason the Court emphasised that the Authority should have carried out an investigation on the effects of the change in legal status on the decision making process within the NDLA [82].
Zbog toga Sud naglašava da je Tijelo trebalo ispitati učinke promjene pravnog statusa na postupak donošenja odluka u NDLA-u [82].
The management structure of the NDLA entity did not change when it was converted into an inter-municipal cooperation under the Local Government Act [83].
Upravljačka struktura subjekta NDLA nije se promijenila pri promjeni u međuopćinsku suradnju u skladu sa Zakonom o lokalnoj upravi [83].
Furthermore, the scope of the NDLA's powers and the decision making processes did not change.
Osim toga, opseg ovlasti NDLA-a i postupak donošenja odluka nije se promijenio.
As such, the scope of the NDLA's decisional making powers did not change.
Stoga se opseg ovlasti NDLA-a u donošenju odluka nije promijenio.
The Authority has compared the structure of the NDLA in its ad hoc cooperation phase [84] with the structure in the inter-municipal cooperation phase [85] and found that there are no material differences.
Tijelo je usporedilo ustrojstvo NDLA-a tijekom faze ad hoc suradnje [84] s ustrojstvom u fazi međuopćinske suradnje [85] i ustanovilo da nema znatnih razlika.
The goal of the NDLA in both phases has been to develop and offer free digital learning material that covers all subjects in the upper secondary school [86].
Cilj NDLA-a u obje faze bio je izrada i ponuda besplatnih digitalnih nastavnih materijala za sve predmete u višim srednjim školama [86].
Furthermore, in both phases, the NDLA consisted of a similar trio of decision making bodies.
Osim toga, NDLA su u obje faze činila slična tri tijela za donošenje odluka.
The FFU became the Supervisory Board of the cooperation under the Local Government Act and its Management Board, composed of five members, was appointed by the Supervisory Board as it had been in the ad hoc cooperation phase, when the management board was appointed by the FFU.
U skladu sa Zakonom o lokalnoj upravi FFU je postao Nadzorni odbor suradnje, a njegovu je Upravu, koja se sastoji od pet članova, imenovao Nadzorni odbor kako je to bilo i tijekom faze ad hoc suradnje, kad je upravu imenovao FFU.
Also the composition of the management group/board has consisted of the same members in both phases, i.e. the leader of the FFU, and at least one representative for each of the training regions (i.e. Northern Region, South Western Region and Eastern Region) [87].
Sastav upravljačke skupine/uprave u obje se faze sastojao od istih članova, tj. voditelja FFU-a i barem jednog predstavnika iz svake obrazovne regije (tj. sjeverne regije, jugo-zapadne regije i istočne regije) [87].
Finally, the NDLA has had a team responsible for the day-to-day management in both phases [88].
Naposljetku, u NDLA-u je u obje faze postojala skupina koja je bila odgovorna za svakodnevno upravljanje [88].
As confirmed by the Norwegian authorities, the change of legal status from the ad hoc cooperation phase to an inter-municipal cooperation phase according to the Local Government Act section 27 had no effect on the decision making process, which is also illustrated and confirmed by the information summarized above [89].
Kako su potvrdila norveška nadležna tijela, promjena pravnog statusa iz faze ad hoc suradnje u fazu međuopćinske suradnje u skladu s člankom 27. Zakona o lokalnoj upravi nije utjecala na postupak donošenja odluka, što je prikazano i potvrđeno i u prethodno sažeto iznesenim informacijama [89].
The ultimate source of the NDLA funding has not changed over time (i.e. funds from the State); rather the manner in which the funds were channelled to the NDLA changed.
Glavni izvor sredstava za financiranje NDLA-a nije se mijenjao (tj. državna sredstva), ali se promijenio način dodjele sredstava NDLA-u.
Indeed, in the early stages of the NDLA, funds were received directly from the Ministry of Education and Research, whilst later on, the NDLA was funded from the participating county authorities' budgets (those budgets being funded by the general grant scheme).
Doista, u ranim fazama NDLA-a, sredstva su primana izravno od Ministarstva obrazovanja i istraživanja, a poslije se NDLA financirao iz proračunâ sudjelujućih okružnih vlasti (a proračuni su se financirali iz općeg programa bespovratnih sredstava).
The fact remains that the NDLA has been and is fully funded by public authorities and distributes the learning material free of charge.
Preostaje činjenica da su NDLA financirala i dalje financiraju tijela javne vlasti te da on distribuira besplatne nastavne materijale.
Neither the schools nor the pupils pay any contribution to the NDLA.
Škole i učenici NDLA-u ne uplaćuju nikakav doprinos.
The Authority further notes, that there are no indications that the NDLA engages in any other form of activity, which could be considered as being economic in nature.
Tijelo nadalje smatra da nema naznaka da se NDLA bavio drugim oblicima djelatnosti koje bi se po karakteru mogle smatrati ekonomskima.
There is no connection between the actual costs of the service provided and the fee paid by those benefiting from the activity.
Ne postoji veza između stvarnog troška pružene usluge i naknade koju plaćaju korisnici djelatnosti.
Further, the NDLA's activities are funded entirely by the public purse and not through remuneration [90].
Osim toga, djelatnosti NDLA-a financiraju se u cijelosti javnim sredstvima, a ne uz naknadu [90].
The county authorities pooling of State resources in order to fulfil their obligation to provide digital learning materials into an inter-municipal cooperation is non-economic in nature
Sjedinjavanje državnih sredstava u međuopćinsku suradnju kako bi okružne vlasti ispunile svoju obvezu opskrbe digitalnim nastavnim materijalima neekonomskog je karaktera
The Authority has concluded that the activities of the NDLA relating to the provision of digital learning materials is closely linked to the broader teaching mission of the county authorities and that it is non-economic in nature.
Tijelo je zaključilo da su djelatnosti NDLA-a povezane s opskrbom digitalnim nastavnim materijalima usko povezane sa širim obrazovnim ciljem okružnih vlasti i da su neekonomskog karaktera.
In the following, the Authority assesses an issue raised by the EFTA Court.
U dijelu koji slijedi Tijelo ocjenjuje pitanja koja je postavio Sud EFTA-e.
The EFTA Court found that it was unclear from the Decision whether the obligation to provide digital learning material free of charge falls upon the county authorities or upon the NDLA [91].
Sud EFTA-e ustanovio je da iz Odluke nije jasno je li opskrba besplatnim digitalnim nastavnim materijalima obveza okružnih vlasti ili NDLA-a [91].
The EFTA Court noted that in the Decision, the Authority ‘refers to the Norwegian legislation and states that it obliged the counties to provide the pupils with the necessary printed and digital learning materials free of charge’ [92].
Sud EFTA-e navodi da se u Odluci Tijelo „poziva na norveško zakonodavstvo i smatra da je obvezalo okruge da učenike opskrbe potrebnim tiskanim i digitalnim nastavnim materijalima bez naknade” [92].
The EFTA Court further noted that in the assessment on the autonomy of the NDLA, the Decision states that the NDLA cannot decide on charging fees to the end consumer ‘(…) since the legal framework obliges the NDLA to provide its services free of charge’ [93].
Sud EFTA-e nadalje navodi da se u pogledu ocjene samostalnosti NDLA-a u Odluci navodi da NDLA ne može odlučiti da od krajnjih potrošača traži naknadu „[…] jer pravni okvir obvezuje NDLA da svoje usluge pruža besplatno” [93].
The judgment also refers to the Authority's statement at the oral hearing that it is the county authorities which bear the statutory obligation to offer this service free of charge and that they had decided to offer this service jointly through the NDLA [94].
Presuda se odnosi i na izjavu Tijela danu tijekom usmene rasprave da je zakonska obveza okružnih tijela da tu uslugu pružaju besplatno i da su ih ona odlučila pružati zajednički s pomoću NDLA-a [94].
In light of this, the EFTA Court considered the above mentioned statements in the Decision to represent an implicit contradiction as it was not clear who the NDLA's client was.
U tom je pogledu Sud EFTA-e zaključio da su prethodno navedene izjave iz Odluke proturječne jer nije jasno tko je korisnik NDLA-a.
The legal framework in which the NDLA operates consists of a number of different elements.
Pravni okvir unutar kojeg djeluje NDLA sastoji se od niza različitih elemenata.
First, there are statutory obligations under national law (such as the Education Act), which are imposed upon the county authorities.
Prvo, u skladu s nacionalnim pravom (kao što je Zakon o obrazovanju) okružne vlasti moraju ispunjavati neke zakonske obveze.
The 2007 amendment to the Education Act, for instance, (see paragraph 20 above) imposed an obligation on the county authorities to provide school children with digital material free of charge.
Primjerice izmjenama Zakona o obrazovanju iz 2007. (vidjeti točku 20.) uvedena je obveza da okružne vlasti školsku djecu opskrbe besplatnim digitalnim materijalima.
Second, there were various administrative acts which were adopted in order for the county authorities to discharge this statutory obligation.
Drugo, doneseni su razni upravni akti kako bi okružne vlasti mogle ispuniti svoju zakonsku obvezu.
These included resolutions (such as the resolutions passed by the county authorities), as well as other administrative acts such as the April 2007 award of funding by the Ministry of Education and Research.
To je uključivalo rezolucije (kao što su rezolucije koje su donijele okružne vlasti) te ostale upravne akte kao što je akt o dodjeli sredstava Ministarstva obrazovanja i istraživanja iz travnja 2007.
Finally, the Articles of Association of the NDLA, and the mandate before that, implemented the county authorities' statutory obligation into a legal obligation on NDLA to provide digital materials free of charge.
Naposljetku, Statutom NDLA-a, a prije toga i mandatom, provedena je zakonska obveza okružnih vlasti u zakonsku obvezu NDLA-a da osigura besplatnu opskrbu digitalnim materijalima.
This framework was also described in the Norwegian authorities' submission of 2 May 2013 in which they confirmed (i) the county authorities' statutory obligation (see Section 1 of the submission), (ii) the obligation imposed on the NDLA's board of directors, in the ad hoc cooperation phase, to work towards offering free digital learning materials (see first bullet point under result goals of the Mandate [95]), and (iii) that the resolutions adopted by the county authorities establishing the NDLA stated that the ultimate goal of the NDLA was to offer free digital material (see p. 6 of the submission).
Taj su okvir opisala i norveška nadležna tijela u svojem podnesku od 2. svibnja 2013. u kojemu su potvrdila i. zakonsku obvezu nadležnih tijela (vidjeti točku 1. podneska); ii. obvezu Uprave NDLA tijekom faze ad hoc suradnje da radi na opskrbi besplatnim digitalnim nastavnim materijalima (vidjeti prvu točku konačnih ciljeva mandata [95]); i iii. da se u rezolucijama o osnivanju NDLA-a koje su donijele okružne vlasti navodi da je glavni cilj NDLA-a opskrba besplatnim digitalnim materijalima (vidjeti str. 6. podneska).
As such, the participating county authorities have chosen to address their statutory obligation to provide free digital material to the pupils by setting up the NDLA inter-municipal cooperation, which in turn operates within a legal framework (including the county authority resolutions and the Articles of Association) that has been established to enable the county authorities to discharge their statutory obligation.
Sudjelujuće okružne vlasti odlučile su svoju zakonsku obvezu opskrbe učenika besplatnim digitalnim materijalima ispuniti osnivanjem međuopćinske suradnje NDLA, koja djeluje unutar pravnog okvira (uključujući rezolucije okružnih vlasti i Statut) koji je uspostavljen kako bi okružne vlasti mogle ispuniti svoju zakonsku obvezu.
In summary, the NDLA can be described as a cooperation between the participating county authorities that has been created to enable the county authorities to pool their resources.
Ukratko, NDLA se može opisati kao suradnja među sudjelujućim okružnim vlastima pokrenuta kako bi okružne vlasti mogle udružiti svoje resurse.
So rather than purchasing and developing digital materials on a county authority-by-county authority basis, the vast majority of the county authorities have decided to combine their resources in order to address their statutory obligation (this type of cooperation between the county authorities was envisaged by the Ministry of Education and Research itself when it invited the county authorities to apply for funding in 2006) [96].
Stoga je, umjesto da okružne vlasti zasebno kupuju i izrađuju digitalne materijale, velika većina okružnih vlasti odlučila udružiti svoje resurse kako bi ispunile svoju zakonsku obvezu (taj tip suradnje predvidjelo je sâmo Ministarstvo obrazovanja i istraživanja pozivanjem okružnih vlasti da se prijave za dodjelu sredstava 2006.) [96].
The county authorities are therefore, though this cooperation, ‘exercising their powers in order to fulfil their duties towards their population’ [97].
Okružne vlasti stoga, s pomoću te suradnje, „izvršavaju svoje ovlasti kako bi ispunile svoje dužnosti prema stanovništvu” [97].
This has been confirmed by the Norwegian authorities in their submission of 31 March 2014 where it is reiterated that the collaboration between the county authorities is an integral part of the county authorities' efforts to provide free public upper secondary education in Norway.
To su potvrdila norveška nadležna tijela u svojem podnesku od 31. ožujka 2014. naglasivši da je suradnja među okružnim vlastima sastavni dio nastojanja okružnih vlasti da osiguraju besplatno javno više srednjoškolsko obrazovanje u Norveškoj.
As regards budget issues, the NDLA has no decisional power.
Kad je riječ o proračunskim pitanjima, NDLA nema ovlasti donošenja odluka.
Although its Management Board recommends a level of funding for the following budget, it is only a recommendation which the participating county authorities take into account when determining the NDLA's budget.
Iako Uprava preporučuje razinu financiranja za sljedeći proračun, to je samo preporuka koju pri utvrđivanju proračuna za NDLA sudjelujuće okružne vlasti uzimaju u obzir.
In terms of procurement and purchasing, the NDLA follows a public tender strategy which was adopted in order to ensure that the NDLA's public tenders are in full compliance with the Public Procurement Act [98].
Kad je riječ o nabavi i kupnji, NDLA poštuje strategiju javnih natječaja donesenu kako bi javni natječaji NDLA-a bili potpuno u skladu sa Zakonom o javnoj nabavi [98].
For purchasing more generally, the NDLA's powers are set out in the Articles of Association, which limit the scope of the NDLA's purchasing activities to the objectives that have been set for the NDLA, namely the purchasing and development of digital learning material [99].
U širem smislu ovlasti NDLA-a u pogledu kupnje utvrđene su u Statutu, kojim se opseg njegovih djelatnosti kupnje ograničava na ciljeve utvrđene za NDLA, tj. na kupnju i izradu digitalnih nastavnih materijala [99].
Clearly, the NDLA needs to be able to carry out its tasks in an effective manner and it would make little sense for the participating county authorities or the Supervisory Board to get involved with every single purchase of digital learning material for instance.
Jasna je potreba da NDLA učinkovito obavlja svoje zadaće i ne bi imalo smisla da se primjerice sudjelujuće okružne vlasti ili Nadzorni odbor uključuju za svaku pojedinačnu kupnju digitalnih nastavnih materijala.
Hence, the Articles of Association provide for some autonomy for the NDLA's day-to-day activities, specifically in terms of purchasing, but this autonomy is limited by the NDLA's stated tasks and its budget (i.e. it goes no further than what is necessary ultimately to fulfil the statutory requirements imposed by the State on the county authorities) [100].
Stoga se Statutom predviđa samostalnost svakodnevnih aktivnosti NDLA-a, posebno u smislu kupnje, ali je ta samostalnost ograničena na utvrđene zadaće NDLA-a i njegov proračun (tj. samo na ono što je potrebno za ispunjavanje zakonskih uvjeta koje je država postavila okružnim vlastima) [100].
Finally, it is worth noting that the case law of the Court of Justice makes clear that there is no need to dissociate the purchasing activities ‘from the subsequent use to which they are put in order to determine the nature of that purchasing activity’ [101].
Naposljetku, vrijedni napomenuti da sudska praksa Suda naglašava da nije potrebno odvajati djelatnosti kupnje „od naknadne upotrebe za koju je namijenjena kako bi se odredila priroda te djelatnosti kupnje” [101].
Thus, to the extent that the NDLA's activities in terms of providing free digital learning material is considered to be non-economic in nature, it follows that any related purchasing activities will also be considered non-economic.
Stoga se, u mjeri u kojoj se može smatrati da su djelatnosti NDLA-a u pogledu opskrbe besplatnim digitalnim nastavnim materijalima neekonomskog karaktera, može zaključiti i da se sve povezane djelatnosti kupnje mogu smatrati neekonomskima.
Since the Articles of Association makes clear that the NDLA may only purchase goods or services that are necessary for the fulfilment of its goal (i.e. the provision of free digital learning material), such purchasing activities will necessarily be related to the non-economic activity.
S obzirom na to da je prema Statutu jasno da NDLA može kupovati samo robe i usluge neophodne za ostvarenje njegova cilja (tj. opskrba besplatnim digitalnim nastavnim materijalima), te će djelatnosti kupnje nužno biti povezane s neekonomskom djelatnošću.
From the facts set out in Section I.4.6 above, it is apparent that the NDLA does not have any employees nor does it have its own premises or infrastructure.
Iz činjenica iznesenih u odjeljku I.4.6. jasno je da NDLA ne može imati zaposlenike, svoje prostore ili infrastrukturu.
Most of its workforce consists of county authority employees who are seconded (either part-time or full-time) to the NDLA for a certain period of time.
Većinu njegove radne snage čine zaposlenici upućeni (u nepunom ili punom radnom vremenu) u NDLA na određeno razdoblje.
The NDLA then simply reimburses the relevant county authority for the time its employee has spent working on NDLA projects.
NDLA plaća odgovarajućim okružnim vlastima za vrijeme koje su njihovi zaposlenici proveli radeći na projektima NDLA-a.
The rest of the workforce consists of external consultants which have won bids in public procurement procedures that the NDLA finances through its budget.
Preostale zaposlenike čine vanjski savjetnici odabrani putem postupaka javne nabave, a NDLA ih plaća iz svojeg proračuna.
On the one hand therefore, the NDLA has no control over the costs of the bulk of its staff and, on the other, the NDLA has limited decisional-making power in respect of the services it puts out for tender, as it is bound by its public tender strategy and its decisions are ultimately subject to the county authorities' control through the Supervisory Board.
Stoga, s jedne strane, NDLA nema kontrolu nad troškovima većine svojeg osoblja i, s druge strane, NDLA ima ograničene ovlasti donošenja odluka u pogledu usluga uključenih u javni natječaj jer je on obvezan strategijom javnih natječaja te njegove odluke podliježu kontroli okružnih vlasti preko Nadzornog odbora.
Consequently, in matters of infrastructure and personnel, the NDLA has very little autonomy.
Iz toga se može zaključiti da NDLA, u pitanjima infrastrukture i osoblja, ima jako malo samostalnosti.
In cases in which the activity in question is carried out by entities other than the State itself, one of the issues to be determined is whether the recipient of the funds (public or private) is subject to the control of the State and in particular whether the recipient merely applies the law and cannot influence the statutory conditions of the service (i.e. the amount of the contributions, the use of assets and the fixing of the level of benefits) [102].
U slučajevima kada predmetnu djelatnost obavljaju subjekti koji nisu država, jedno je od pitanja koje treba utvrditi podliježu li primatelji sredstava (javni ili privatni) kontroli države i posebno primjenjuje li primatelj samo pravo bez mogućnosti utjecanja na zakonske uvjete usluge (tj. iznos doprinosâ, upotrebu sredstava i utvrđivanje razine koristi) [102].
If, on the contrary, the recipient has significant discretion vis-a-vis the State as regards the commercial parameters of its activities (e.g. prices, costs, assets and employees), it would be more likely to constitute an undertaking.
Ako s druge strane primatelj ima znatnu slobodu prema državi u pogledu trgovačkih parametara svojih aktivnosti (npr. cijene, troškovi, imovina i zaposlenici), bilo bi vjerojatnije da je riječ o poduzetniku.