natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
an electronic copy of the patent certificate(s) showing the number and claims of the patent for a biotechnological invention and the granting authority or authorities of the patent;’;
elektronsku kopiju certifikatâ patenta s brojem i patentnim zahtjevima za biotehnološki pronalazak kao i podatke o tijelu ili tijelima koja su odobrila patent;”;
in paragraph 3, point (c) is replaced by the following:
u stavku 3. točka (c) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
an electronic copy of the patent certificate(s) showing the number and claims of the patent for a biotechnological invention and the granting authority or authorities of the patent;’
elektronsku kopiju certifikatâ patenta s brojem i patentnim zahtjevima za biotehnološki pronalazak kao i podatke o tijelu ili tijelima koja su odobrila patent;”.
In Article 45, point (a) is replaced by the following:
U članku 45. točka (a) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
the designation of the appellant as a party to appeal proceedings in accordance with Article 2, and, where the appellant has appointed a procedural representative, the name and address of the representative;’
podatke o podnositelju žalbe kao stranke u žalbenom postupku u skladu s člankom 2. i, ako je podnositelj žalbe imenovao zastupnika u postupku, ime i adresu zastupnika;”.
The following Article 51a is inserted:
Umeće se sljedeći članak 51.a:
‘Article 51a
„Članak 51.a
Several appeals
Nekoliko žalbi
If several appeals are filed against a decision, those appeals may be considered in the same proceedings.
Ako je podneseno nekoliko žalbi na istu odluku, o tim se žalbama može odlučivati u okviru istog postupka.
If appeals filed against decisions are to be examined by the Board having the same composition, that Board may deal with those appeals in joint proceedings.’
Ako žalbe na odluke Vijeće mora razmotriti u istom sastavu, Vijeće može navedene žalbe rješavati u zajedničkom postupku.”
In Article 53, the following paragraph 5 is added:
U članku 53. dodaje se sljedeći stavak 5.:
The Office shall cancel the entry in the Register of Community Plant Variety Rights or revoke the decision that contains an obvious procedural error attributable to negligence.’
Ured poništava unos u Upisnik oplemenjivačkih prava Zajednice ili opoziva odluku koja sadržava očitu postupovnu pogrešku koja se može pripisati nemaru.”
The following Article 53a is inserted:
Umeće se sljedeći članak 53.a:
‘Article 53a
„Članak 53.a
Proceedings for nullity and cancellation
Postupak za proglašenje ništavosti i ukidanje
Proceedings on nullity and cancellations as referred to in Articles 20 and 21, respectively, of the basic Regulation may be opened by the Office when there are serious doubts as regards the validity of the title.
Ured može pokrenuti postupak za proglašenje ništavosti iz članka 20. i za ukidanje iz članka 21. Osnovne uredbe ako postoje ozbiljne sumnje u pogledu valjanosti prava.
Such proceedings may be initiated by the Office on its own motion or upon request.
Taj postupak Ured može pokrenuti na vlastitu inicijativu ili na zahtjev.
A request to the Office to open the proceedings on nullity or cancellation, as referred to in Articles 20 and 21, respectively, of the basic Regulation, shall be accompanied by evidence and facts raising serious doubts as to the validity of the title and shall contain:
Uz zahtjev za pokretanje postupka za proglašenje ništavosti iz članka 20. ili ukidanje iz članka 21. Osnovne uredbe prilažu se dokazi i činjenice koji izazivaju sumnju u valjanost prava i koji sadržavaju:
as regards the registration in respect of which nullity or cancellation is sought:
u pogledu registracije za koju se traži proglašenje ništavosti ili ukidanje:
the registration number of the Community plant variety right;
i. registarski broj oplemenjivačkog prava Zajednice;
the name and address of the holder of the Community plant variety right;
ime i adresu nositelja oplemenjivačkog prava Zajednice;
as regards the grounds on which the request is based:
u pogledu razloga na kojima se zasniva zahtjev:
a statement of the grounds on which the request to open the proceedings on nullity or cancellation is based;
i. izjavu o razlozima na kojima se zasniva zahtjev za otvaranje postupka za proglašenje ništavosti ili ukidanje;
an indication of the facts, evidence and arguments presented in support of those grounds;
činjenice, dokaze i obrazloženja iznesena u prilog tih razloga;
the name and address of the person making the request and, where he has appointed a procedural representative, the name and address of that representative.
ime i adresu osobe koja podnosi taj zahtjev i, ako je imenovala zastupnika u postupku, ime i adresu zastupnika.
Any decision of the Office to reject a request as referred to in paragraph 2 shall be communicated to the person who made the request and the holder of the Community plant variety right.
O svakoj odluci Ureda o odbacivanju zahtjeva iz stavka 2. obavješćuje se osoba koja je zahtjev podnijela te nositelj oplemenjivačkog prava Zajednice.
The Office shall not take into account written submissions or documents, or parts thereof, that have not been submitted within the time limit set by the Office.
Ured ne uzima u obzir pisane podneske ili dokumente ili njihove dijelove koji nisu podneseni u roku koji je utvrdio Ured.
Any decision of the Office to declare null and void or cancel a Community plant variety right shall be published in the Official Gazette referred to in Article 87.’
Sve odluke Ureda o proglašenju ništavosti ili opozivu oplemenjivačkog prava Zajednice objavljuju se u Službenom listu iz članka 87.”
In Article 54(1), the following sentence is added:
U članku 54. stavku 1. dodaje se sljedeća rečenica:
‘That certificate shall be delivered by the Office, in the form of a digital document, to the holder of the right or his procedural representative.’
„Ured dostavlja certifikat nositelju prava ili njegovu zastupniku u postupku u obliku digitalnog dokumenta.”
Article 57 is amended as follows:
25. Članak 57. mijenja se kako slijedi:
‘Where a document is submitted to the Office by electronic means, the indication of the name of the sender and the electronic authentication, consisting of a successful submission of login and password, shall be deemed to be equivalent to the signature.’;
„Ako je dokument Uredu dostavljen elektroničkim putem, navođenje imena pošiljatelja i elektronička provjera vjerodostojnosti, koja se sastoji od uspješnog unosa korisničkog imena i lozinke, smatraju se istovjetnim potpisu.”;
Such document submitted by a party to proceedings must be communicated by electronic means or on paper to the other parties and to the Examination Office concerned.
Druge stranke u postupku i predmetni Ured za ispitivanje moraju se elektroničkim ili pisanim putem obavijestiti o dokumentima koje je podnijela stranka u postupku.
In case of paper submissions, documents relating to the proceedings, to two or more applications for a Community plant variety right or to an exploitation right, shall be filed in a sufficient number of copies.
U slučaju podnesaka u papirnatom obliku dokumenti koji se odnose na postupak, na dva ili više zahtjeva za dodjelu oplemenjivačkog prava Zajednice ili pravo iskorištavanja dostavljaju se u dovoljnom broju kopija.
Missing copies shall be provided at the expense of the party concerned.’
Kopije koje nedostaju stavljaju se na raspolaganje na trošak predmetne stranke.”
Evidence of final judgments and decisions, other than those of the Office, or other documentary evidence to be submitted by a party to proceedings, may be furnished by submitting a digital document or uncertified copy.’
Dokazi o pravomoćnim presudama ili odlukama, osim onih koje je donio Ured, ili drugi dokumentarni dokazi koje dostavlja stranka u postupku, mogu se dostavljati u obliku digitalnog dokumenta ili neovjerene kopije.”
Article 62 is amended as follows:
27. Članak 62. mijenja se kako slijedi:
Witnesses and experts who are summoned by and appear before the Office shall be entitled to appropriate reimbursement of expenses for travel and subsistence.
Svjedoci i vještaci koji su pozvani i koji se pojavljuju pred Uredom imaju pravo na odgovarajuću naknadu putnih troškova i dnevnica.
An advance may be granted to them by the Office.’;
Ured im može odobriti predujam.”;
‘The party that requested oral evidence by witnesses or experts shall reimburse the costs of that evidence to the Office, subject to the decision on apportionment and fixing costs pursuant to Article 52.’
„Stranka koja je zatražila usmene dokaze svjedoka ili vještaka nadoknađuje troškove tog dokaza Uredu u skladu s odlukom o raspoređivanju i utvrđivanju troškova u skladu s člankom 52.”
Article 63 is amended as follows:
28. Članak 63. mijenja se kako slijedi:
in paragraph 1, the following sentence is added: ‘They shall also contain the names of the officials of the Office, the parties, their procedural representatives, and of the witnesses and experts who were present.’;
u stavku 1. dodaje se sljedeća rečenica: „Zapisnici sadržavaju i imena službenika Ureda, stranaka, njihovih zastupnika u postupku i prisutnih svjedoka i vještaka.”;
The minutes shall be signed by the person who drew them up and by the person who conducted the oral proceedings or took the evidence.’
Zapisnik potpisuje osoba koja ga je sastavila i osoba koja je vodila usmenu raspravu ili provela postupak izvođenja dokaza.”
Article 64 is amended as follows:
29. Članak 64. mijenja se kako slijedi:
In proceedings before the Office, any service of documents to be made by the Office on a party to proceedings shall take the form of a digital document, an uncertified copy, a print-out or the original document.
U postupcima pred Uredom svaka dostava dokumenata stranci u postupku od strane Ureda obavlja se u obliku digitalnog dokumenta, neovjerene kopije, ispisa ili originalnog dokumenta.
Documents emanating from other parties to proceedings may be served in the form of uncertified copies.’;
Dokumenti drugih stranaka u postupku mogu se dostavljati kao neovjerene kopije.”;
Service shall be made by one or more of the following means:
Dostava se obavlja na jedan od sljedećih načina ili više njih:
by electronic means or any other technical means in accordance with Article 64a;
elektroničkim putem ili bilo kojim drugim tehničkim sredstvom u skladu s člankom 64.a;
by post in accordance with Article 65;
poštom u skladu s člankom 65.;
by delivery by hand in accordance with Article 66;
osobnom dostavom u skladu s člankom 66.;
by public notice in accordance with Article 67.
javnom obavijesti u skladu s člankom 67.
Documents or copies thereof containing actions for which service is provided for in Article 79 of the basic Regulation shall be served by electronic means to be determined by the President of the Office or by postal means by recorded delivery with advice of delivery served.’
Dokumenti ili njihove kopije koji sadržavaju radnje za koje je dostava predviđena u članku 79. Osnovne uredbe dostavljaju se elektroničkim putem koji utvrđuje predsjednik Ureda ili preporučenom poštom s povratnicom.”
The following Article 64a is inserted:
Umeće se sljedeći članak 64.a:
‘Article 64a
„Članak 64.a
Service by electronic means or other technical means
Dostava elektroničkim putem ili drugim tehničkim sredstvima
Service by electronic means shall be made by transmitting a digital copy of the document to be notified.
Dostava elektroničkim putem vrši se slanjem digitalne kopije dokumenta koji se treba uručiti.
Service shall be deemed to have taken place on the date on which the communication was received by the recipient.
Dostava se smatra izvršenom na datum kada je primatelj primio obavijest.
The President of the Office shall determine the details of service by electronic means.
Predsjednik Ureda određuje pojedinosti u vezi s dostavom elektroničkim putem.
Where service is made by electronic means, a party to proceedings, including his procedural representative, shall provide an electronic address to the Office for all official communication.
Ako se dostava provodi elektroničkim putem, stranka u postupku, uključujući njezina zastupnika u postupku, dostavlja Uredu elektroničku adresu za svu službenu komunikaciju.
The President of the Office shall determine the details of service by other technical means of communication.’
Predsjednik Ureda određuje pojedinosti povezane s dostavom ostalim tehničkim sredstvima komunikacije.”
The following Article 66a is inserted:
Umeće se sljedeći članak 66.a:
Service to procedural representatives
Dostava zastupnicima u postupku
Where a procedural representative has been appointed, or where the applicant first named in a joint application pursuant to Article 73(5) is considered to be the procedural representative, notifications shall be addressed to the procedural representative.
Ako je imenovan zastupnik u postupku ili ako se podnositelj zahtjeva koji je prvi naveden u zajedničkom zahtjevu u skladu s člankom 73. stavkom 5. smatra zastupnikom u postupku, obavijesti se upućuju zastupniku u postupku.
Where several procedural representatives have been appointed for a single party, notification to any one of those representatives shall be sufficient, unless a specific address for service has been indicated.
Ako je za jednu stranku imenovano više zastupnika u postupku, dovoljno je obavijestiti jednog od tih zastupnika, osim ako je navedena posebna adresa za dostavu.
Where several parties have appointed a common procedural representative, notification of the relevant documents to that representative shall be sufficient.’
Ako je nekoliko stranaka imenovalo zajedničkog zastupnika u postupku, dovoljno je dostaviti relevantne dokumente tom zastupniku.”
The second sentence of Article 67 is replaced by the following: ‘The President of the Office shall determine details as to the issue of a public notice and shall determine the period within which the relevant document shall be deemed to have been notified.’
U članku 67. druga rečenica zamjenjuje se sljedećim: „Predsjednik Ureda utvrđuje pojedinosti povezane s javnom obavijesti i utvrđuje rok u kojem se smatra da je dokument dostavljen.”
Article 71 is amended as follows:
33. Članak 71. mijenja se kako slijedi:
in paragraph 1, the second sentence is replaced by the following: ‘The days referred to in the first sentence shall be as stated by the President of the Office before the commencement of each calendar year and shall be published in the Official Gazette referred to in Article 87.’;
u stavku 1. druga rečenica zamjenjuje se sljedećim: „Dani navedeni u prvoj rečenici oni su koje odredi predsjednik Ureda prije početka svake kalendarske godine i objavljuju se u Službenom listu iz članka 87.”;
‘As regards documents submitted by electronic means, the first subparagraph shall apply mutatis mutandis where there is an interruption of the connection of the Office or of one of the parties to the proceedings to the electronic means of communication. Parties to the proceedings shall demonstrate the interruption of the connection with the electronic provider.’
„U pogledu dokumenata koji se dostavljaju elektroničkim putem, prvi se podstavak primjenjuje mutatis mutandis ako dođe do prekida veze Ureda ili jedne od stranaka u postupku na elektronička sredstva komunikacije. Stranke u postupku dokazuju prekid veze s pružateljem usluge.”
Article 73 is amended as follows:
34. Članak 73. mijenja se kako slijedi:
Two or more parties to proceedings acting in common shall appoint one procedural representative and notify the Office thereof.
Dvije stranke u postupku ili više njih koje zajednički nastupaju imenuju jednog zastupnika u postupku i o tome obavješćuju Ured.
Where they have not notified a procedural representative to the Office, the party to the proceedings first named in an application for a Community plan variety right or for an exploitation right to be granted by the Office or in an objection shall be deemed to be appointed as the procedural representative of the other party or parties to the proceedings.’;
Ako nisu obavijestile Ured o zastupniku u postupku, smatra se da je stranka u postupku koja je prva navedena u zahtjevu za dodjelu oplemenjivačkih prava Zajednice ili dodjelu prava iskorištavanja koje dodjeljuje Ured ili u uloženom prigovoru imenovana kao zastupnik u postupku druge stranke ili stranaka u postupku.”;
the following paragraph 6 is added:
dodaje se sljedeći stavak 6.:
Paragraph 5 shall apply where, in the course of proceedings, a transfer of a Community plant variety right is made to more than one person and where such persons have appointed more than one procedural representative.’
Stavak 5. primjenjuje se ako se tijekom postupka oplemenjivačko pravo Zajednice prenese na više od jedne osobe i ako su te osobe imenovale više od jednog zastupnika u postupku.”
Article 74 is amended as follows:
35. Članak 74. mijenja se kako slijedi:
Credentials may cover one or more proceedings.
Punomoći mogu obuhvaćati jedan ili više postupaka.
General credentials enabling a procedural representative to act in all the proceedings of the party giving the credentials may be filed.
Mogu se dostaviti i opće punomoći kojima se zastupniku u postupku omogućuje da djeluje u svim postupcima u kojima sudjeluje stranka koja ga opunomoćuje.
A single document embodying the general credentials shall be sufficient.’;
Dovoljan je jedan dokument kojim su obuhvaćene sve opće ovlasti.”;
The entry of a procedural representative in the Register of Applications for Community Plant Variety Rights shall be deleted:
Unos zastupnika u postupku u Upisnik zahtjeva za dodjelu oplemenjivačkih prava Zajednice briše se:
in the event of the death or legal incapacity of the procedural representative;
u slučaju smrti ili pravne nesposobnosti ovlaštenog zastupnika;
where the procedural representative is no longer domiciled or no longer has his seat or establishment within the European Union;
ako ovlašteni zastupnik više nema prebivalište, sjedište ili poslovni nastan u Europskoj uniji;
where the procedural representative is no longer appointed by the party to the proceedings and the party has informed the Office accordingly.’
ako ovlašteni zastupnik više nije imenovani zastupnik stranke u postupku, a stranka je o tome na odgovarajući način obavijestila Ured.”
Article 78(1) is amended as follows:
36. Članak 78. stavak 1. mijenja se kako slijedi:
a particular claim regarding priority pursuant to Article 20 of this Regulation (date and place of the earlier application);’;
posebni zahtjev u pogledu prvenstva u skladu s člankom 20. ove Uredbe (datum i mjesto prethodnog zahtjeva);”;
the following point (e) is added:
dodaje se sljedeća točka (e):
the giving of the right deriving from an application for a Community plant variety right as a security or as the object of any other rights in rem.’
dodjela prava koje proizlazi iz zahtjeva za dodjelu oplemenjivačkog prava Zajednice kao jamstvo ili predmet drugih prava in rem.”
In Article 81, paragraphs 2 and 3 are replaced by the following:
U članku 81. stavci 2. i 3. zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
Paragraph 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the institution of actions in respect of claims referred to in Articles 98 and 99 of the basic Regulation, and the final decision not subject to any appeal in, or of any other termination of, any such action.
Stavak 1. primjenjuje se mutatis mutandis na pokretanje postupaka povezanih sa zahtjevima iz članaka 98. i 99. Osnovne uredbe i na konačnu odluku na koju se ne može uložiti žalba ili na drugo okončanje tog započetog postupka.
Where varieties are identified as initial or essentially derived, respectively, a request for entry by all the parties to the proceedings may be made jointly or separately.
Ako je riječ o sortama priznatima kao inicijalne sorte odnosno kao izvedene sorte, zahtjev za unos mogu podnijeti sve stranke u postupku zajedno ili odvojeno.
A request from only one party to the proceedings shall be accompanied by documentary evidence of the elements referred to in Article 87(2)(h) of the basic Regulation to replace the request of the other party.
Zahtjevu samo jedne stranke u postupku prilažu se dokumentarni dokazi o elementima iz članka 87. stavka 2. točke (h) Osnovne uredbe, kako bi zahtjev zamijenio zahtjev druge stranke.
Such documentary evidence shall include the identification of the varieties concerned as initial and essentially derived, and the non-contentious acknowledgement by the other party or the final judgement.’
Dokumentarni dokazi obuhvaćaju označavanje sorti kao inicijalnih sorti i izvedenih sorti te neosporno priznanje druge stranke ili konačnu presudu.”
In Article 82, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
U članku 82. stavak 3. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
The President of the Office may provide for public inspection of the Registers on the premises of national agencies or sub-offices involved in the exercise of specific administrative functions, pursuant to Article 30(4) of the basic Regulation.’
Predsjednik Ureda može osigurati javni uvid u upisnike u prostorijama nacionalnih agencija ili podružnica koje obavljaju posebne upravne funkcije, u skladu s člankom 30. stavkom 4. Osnovne uredbe.”
In Article 83, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
U članku 83. stavci 1. i 2. zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
Documents relating to proceedings shall be kept in electronic format in electronic files, a file number being attached to such proceedings, except for those documents relating to the exclusion of, or objection to, members of the Board of Appeal, or to the staff of the Office or the Examination Office concerned, which shall be kept separately.
Dokumenti koji se odnose na postupke čuvaju se u elektroničkom obliku u elektroničkim spisima kojima se dodjeljuje urudžbeni broj, osim dokumenata koji se odnose na isključenje ili prigovor na članove Žalbenog vijeća ili osoblje Ureda ili Ureda za ispitivanje, koji se čuvaju odvojeno.
The Office shall keep an electronic copy of the file referred in paragraph 1 (“file copy”) which shall be considered the true and complete copy of the file.
Ured čuva elektroničku kopiju spisa iz stavka 1. (‚primjerak za arhivu’) koji se smatra vjerodostojnom i potpunom kopijom spisa.
The Examination Office shall keep a copy of the additional documents relating to such proceedings (examination copy).’
Ured za ispitivanje zadržava kopiju dodatnih dokumenata koji se odnose na takve postupke (‚kopija za ispitivanje’).”
In Article 91, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
U članku 91. stavak 3. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
At the time of transmission of the files to the courts or public prosecutor's offices of the Member States, the Office shall indicate the restrictions to which the inspection of documents relating to applications for, or to grants of Community plant variety rights is subject pursuant to Articles 33a and 88 of the basic Regulation.’
Pri predaji spisa sudovima ili državnim odvjetništvima država članica Ured navodi ograničenja koja se primjenjuju na uvid u dokumente koji se odnose na zahtjeve za dodjelu ili na dodjelu oplemenjivačkih prava Zajednice u skladu s člancima 33.a i 88. Osnovne uredbe.”
Annex I is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
41. Prilog I. mijenja se u skladu s Prilogom ovoj Uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 1 September 2016.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 1. rujna 2016.
Commission Implementing Directive 2014/97/EU of 15 October 2014 implementing Council Directive 2008/90/EC as regards the registration of suppliers and of varieties and the common list of varieties (OJ L 298, 16.10.2014, p. 16).’
Provedbena direktiva Komisije 2014/97/EU оd 15. listopada 2014. o provedbi Direktive Vijeća 2008/90/EZ u pogledu registracije dobavljača i sorti i zajedničkog popisa sorti (SL L 298, 16.10.2014., str. 16.).”
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 is amended as follows:
Prilog I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 874/2009 mijenja se kako slijedi:
In point 3, the third sentence is replaced by the following:
U točki 3. treća rečenica zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
‘Fees may be paid to an expert only if he produces evidence by supporting documents that he is not a member of the staff of an Examination Office or a technical qualified body.’
„Pristojbe se vještaku mogu isplatiti samo ako dokumentima dokaže da nije član osoblja Ureda za ispitivanje ili tehnički kvalificiranog tijela.”
Point 5 is amended as follows:
2. Točka 5. mijenja se kako slijedi: