natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Savings on climate
Uštede na klimi
Total savings
Ukupne uštede
Accordingly, the Commission considers that the construction of the Žilina-Teplička intermodal terminal may help attain an objective of common interest as it contributes to enhancing multi-modal transport and encouraging a modal shift from road to rail and inland-waterway transport, thereby reducing congestion, accidents, emissions, noise and the negative impact on the climate caused by road transport.
U skladu s tim, Komisija smatra da izgradnja intermodalnog terminala Žilina–Teplička može pomoći postizanju cilja od zajedničkog interesa jer pridonosi poboljšanju multimodalnog prijevoza i poticanju modalnog prijelaza s cestovnog na željeznički prijevoz i prijevoz unutarnjim vodenim putevima, čime se smanjuje zagušenje prometa, nesreće, emisije, buka i negativan učinak na klimu koje uzrokuje cestovni promet.
Necessity and proportionality
Potreba i proporcionalnost
In the past [23], the Commission has authorised investment aid for intermodal terminals with an aid intensity of 50 %.
Prethodno [23], Komisija je odobrila investicijsku potporu za intermodalne terminale s intenzitetom potpore od 50 %.
Recently, where Member States have demonstrated the economic need for a higher aid intensity, the Commission has been willing to accept such higher intensities in duly justified cases [24].
U posljednje vrijeme, kada su države članice iskazale ekonomsku potrebu za višim intenzitetom potpore, Komisija je bila voljna prihvatiti takve više intenzitete u valjano opravdanim slučajevima [24].
In the present case, the Slovak authorities have notified a measure which provides for aid intensity of at least 85 % in favour of the future concession holder.
U ovom predmetu, slovačka tijela najavila su mjeru koja predviđa intenzitet pomoći od najmanje 85 % u korist budućeg nositelja koncesije.
This project is different from the private terminals of Metrans, which the company built with no State aid from Slovakia, and from the nearby WienCont terminal (owned by the City of Vienna), which has been receiving aid with an average intensity of 31 % for the purchase of additional equipment since 2006.
Ovaj projekt razlikuje se od privatnih terminala Metransa, koje je društvo izgradilo bez državne potpore Slovačke, i od obližnjeg terminala WienConta (u vlasništvu Grada Beča), koji prima potporu s prosječnim intenzitetom od 31 % za nabavu dodatne opreme od 2006. godine.
In the case of WienCont the investment was not initial investment for a new terminal built from scratch, as is the case with the Žilina-Teplička terminal.
U slučaju WienConta, ulaganje nije bilo početno ulaganje za novi terminal građen od nule, kao što je to slučaj s terminalom Žilina–Teplička.
Moreover, WienCont uses the rails of the infrastructure manager and the land of the City of Vienna, for which it pays a rent that does not necessarily equal what it would cost to purchase these facilities.
Štoviše, WienCont koristi kolosijeke upravitelja infrastrukture i zemljište Grada Beča, za koje plaća najam koji ne mora nužno biti jednak cijeni kupnje tih objekata.
In any case, as the aid intensity in the Slovak case is above 50 %, the Commission has to consider whether this higher aid intensity can exceptionally be found compatible with the internal market.
U svakom slučaju, s obzirom na to da je intenzitet potpore u slovačkom slučaju iznad 50 %, Komisija treba razmotriti može li se ovaj viši intenzitet potpore smatrati iznimno u skladu s unutarnjim tržištem.
As regards the necessity of the aid, the cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities projects a negative internal rate of return for the planned transport terminal in Žilina-Teplička without public support.
U vezi s potrebom za potporom, analiza troškova i koristi koju su dostavila slovačka tijela predviđa negativnu unutarnju stopu povrata za planirani terminal za prijevoz u Žilini–Teplička bez javne potpore.
When Slovakia takes into account the entire initial investment, including the costs of purchasing the land, the funding gap of the project at a discount rate of 5 % corresponds to the initial investment of EUR 25,04 million. A discount rate of 5 % is comparable to the return on long-term public debt in Slovakia [25].
Kada Slovačka uzme u obzir ukupno početno ulaganje, uključujući troškove kupnje zemljišta, razlika u financiranju projekta po eskontnoj stopi od 5 % odgovara početnom ulaganju od 25,04 milijuna EUR. Eskontna stopa od 5 % je usporediva s povratom na dugoročni javni dug u Slovačkoj [25].
The table below summarises the investment costs, operating costs, expected return on investment and aid amount planned for the construction of the Žilina terminal as calculated in the cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities.
Donja tablica ukratko prikazuje troškove ulaganja, troškove poslovanja, očekivani povrat na ulaganje i iznos potpore planiran za izgradnju terminala u Žilini kako je izračunan u analizi troškova i koristi koju su dostavila slovačka tijela.
Slovak authorities, cost-benefit analysis
slovačka tijela, analiza troškova i koristi.
As the initial investment is limited to the funding gap of the project, the Commission concludes that the aid is necessary to ensure the construction of the intermodal transfer terminal and the development of combined transport in Slovakia.
Kako je početno ulaganje ograničeno na financijski jaz projekta, Komisija zaključuje da je potpora potrebna kako bi se osigurala izgradnja prekrcajnog intermodalnog terminala i razvoj kombiniranog prijevoza u Slovačkoj.
It also takes the view that the aid will be kept to the minimum necessary, since it is greater than the funding gap and is, therefore, proportionate for achieving the common interest objective of ensuring the shift from road transport to rail transport.
Također zauzima stajalište da će se potpora zadržati na potrebnom minimumu jer je veća od financijskog jaza pa je stoga proporcionalna za ostvarenje cilja od zajedničkog interesa, osiguranja prijelaza s cestovnog prijevoza na željeznički prijevoz.
The access to the infrastructure in question is open to all users on a non-discriminatory basis
Pristup predmetnoj infrastrukturi otvoren je za sve korisnike na nediskriminirajućoj osnovi
The purpose of the measure is to construct public intermodal transfer terminals for continental combined transport, in particular semi-trailers and swap-bodies, in order to support the shift from road to rail transport.
Svrha mjere izgraditi je javne prekrcajne intermodalne terminale za kopneni kombinirani prijevoz, posebno poluprikolica i izmjenjivih sanduka radi podrške prijelazu s cestovnog na željeznički prijevoz.
To achieve this objective, the terminals will:
Da bi se postigao ovaj cilj, terminalima će:
be operated by companies independent of the transport companies using them;
upravljati društva neovisna o prijevozničkim društvima koja ih koriste;
provide for open access;
omogućavat će otvoreni pristup;
offer non-discriminatory and transparent conditions.
nudit će nediskriminirajuće i transparentne uvjete.
In order to ensure non-discriminatory access to the terminals and to prevent a conflict of interests from arising between the selected terminal operator and the transport undertakings, the operator of the terminals will be independent of the transport undertakings.
Kako bi se osigurao nediskriminirajući pristup terminalima i spriječio sukob interesa koji bi nastao između odabranih operatora terminala i poduzetnika prijevoznika, operator terminala bit će neovisan o poduzetnicima prijevoznicima.
Moreover, the Slovak State will remain the owner of the terminals and will include in any concession agreement the obligation for the operator of the terminals to guarantee open access to all users, including all transporters and operators of intermodal transport terminals, on a non-discriminatory basis.
Štoviše, država Slovačka ostat će vlasnik terminala i u svaki ugovor o koncesiji ugradit će obvezu za operatora terminala da jamči otvoreni pristup svim korisnicima, uključujući sve prijevoznike i operatore terminala za intermodalni prijevoz, na nediskriminirajućoj osnovi.
If the selected operator fails to fulfil this condition of the concession agreement, the State will have the power to withdraw the concession and put it out to tender again.
Ako odabrani operator ne ispuni ovaj uvjet ugovora o koncesiji, država će imati ovlast povući koncesiju i ponovno ju dati na nadmetanje.
Therefore, the access to the infrastructure in question will be open to all users on a non-discriminatory basis.
Tako će pristup predmetnoj infrastrukturi biti otvoren za sve korisnike na nediskriminirajućoj osnovi.
The aid does not lead to distortions of competition contrary to the common interest
Potpora ne vodi do narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja protivno zajedničkom interesu
The measure as originally notified would affect intermodal terminal services in the Slovak Republic, which also attracts cross-border demand from Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and, to a lesser extent, Poland.
Kako je prvobitno najavljena, mjera bi utjecala na usluge intermodalnog terminala u Republici Slovačkoj, koje također privlače prekograničnu potražnju iz Austrije, Češke Republike, Mađarske i u manjoj mjeri Poljske.
In order to avoid the risk of distortion of competition, as set out in the decision initiating the procedure, and in order to test their assumption regarding the impact of the terminal on shifting goods transport from road to rail, the Slovak authorities undertook to limit the project to building a single pilot project terminal in Žilina-Teplička.
Radi izbjegavanja rizika od narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja, kako je utvrđeno u odluci kojom se pokreće postupak, te radi provjere njihove pretpostavke u pogledu učinka terminala na prijelaz prijevoza roba s cestovnog na željeznički, slovačka tijela su se obvezala ograničiti projekt na izgradnju jedinstvenog pilot-projekta terminala u Žilini–Teplički.
This terminal will be more than 200 km from the current Metrans and WienCont terminals.
Taj terminal bit će udaljen više od 200 km od postojećih terminala Metransa i WienConta.
Its catchment areas will therefore not overlap with the Metrans and WienCont areas.
Njegova gravitirajuća područja tako se neće preklapati s područjima Metransa i WienConta.
This will limit the impact of the measure on competition [26].
To će ograničiti učinak mjere na tržišno natjecanje [26].
According to the Slovak authorities, there is a temporary terminal in Žilina which belongs to Intrans.
Prema slovačkim tijelima postoji privremeni terminal u Žilini koji pripada Intransu.
Unlike the planned terminal, this terminal is small and located in the centre of the town.
Za razliku od planiranog terminala, taj terminal je mali i nalazi se u središtu grada.
At this terminal the loading ramp is accessible only from a single track 400 m long, which it is not possible to extend.
Na tom terminalu ukrcajna rampa dostupna je samo s jednog kolosijeka dugog 400 m, koji nije moguće produžiti.
The terminal is designed for sea containers and does not have any gantry cranes or equipment for transhipment of swap bodies and semi-trailers.
Terminal je projektiran za pomorske kontejnere i nema portalne dizalice niti opremu za pretovar izmjenjivih sanduka i poluprikolica.
Due to town-planning developments, the existing Žilina terminal will in any case be closed in the near future.
Zbog urbanističkih planova postojeći terminal u Žilini u svakom slučaju bit će zatvoren u bližoj budućnosti.
The Slovak authorities have confirmed that the handling charges at the public terminals will correspond to the handling charges of the intermodal transport terminals already operating in the market.
Slovačka tijela potvrdila su da će manipulativne pristojbe na javnim terminalima odgovarati manipulativnim pristojbama terminala za intermodalni prijevoz koji već posluju na tržištu.
The Commission therefore concludes that the measure does not distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Komisija stoga zaključuje da mjera ne narušava tržišno natjecanje do mjere protivne zajedničkom interesu.
In view of the above, the Commission concludes that all the conditions are fulfilled and the investment aid of EUR 25,04 million for the Žilina-Teplička terminal is compatible with the internal market.
U vezi s prethodno navedenim Komisija zaključuje da su ispunjeni svi uvjeti i da je investicijska potpora od 25,04 milijuna EUR za terminal Žilina–Teplička u skladu s unutarnjim tržištem.
Given Slovakia's original plan to build four public intermodal terminals, the Commission requires monitoring of the terminal that is to be built on the basis of the pilot project currently notified.
S obzirom na prvobitni plan Slovačke da izgradi četiri javna intermodalna terminala, Komisija zahtijeva nadzor terminala koji će se graditi na temelju pilot-projekta koji je sada najavljen.
This monitoring will allow the Commission to take a more solid decision on the necessity of the aid and its effect on competition, if at some point in the future Slovakia notifies aid for the remaining three terminals,
Taj nadzor će Komisiji omogućiti da donese čvršću odluku o potrebi za potporom i njezinom učinku na tržišno natjecanje, ako u nekom trenutku u budućnosti Slovačka najavi potporu za preostala tri terminala,
The State aid which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement for the construction of the terminal in Žilina-Teplička in the form of initial investment aid of EUR 25,04 million is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 93 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Državna potpora koju Slovačka Republika planira provesti za izgradnju terminala u Žilini–Teplička u obliku početne investicijske potpore od 25,04 milijuna EUR u skladu je s unutarnjim tržištem u smislu članka 93. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
Implementation of this aid of EUR 25,04 million is accordingly authorised.
Provedba te potpore od 25,04 milijuna EUR se u skladu s tim odobrava.
In three years' time the Slovak Republic shall provide the following information:
U roku od tri godine Slovačka Republika dostavlja sljedeće informacije:
the total volume of intermodal transport, the volume of continental transport and the volume of transport using means other than ISO containers in Slovakia and at the Žilina-Teplička terminal;
ukupni opseg intermodalnog prijevoza, opseg kopnenog prijevoza i opseg prijevoza koji koristi sredstva koja nisu ISO kontejneri u Slovačkoj i na terminalu Žilina–Teplička;
the prices charged at the Žilina-Teplička terminal;
cijene koje se naplaćuju na terminalu Žilina–Teplička;
whether the clients of the new terminals had previously been using the existing terminals and, if so, a survey on why they switched.
jesu li klijenti novih terminala već ranije koristili postojeće terminale i, ako jesu, anketu o razlozima zbog kojih su ih zamijenili.
OJ C 45, 16.2.2013, p. 13.
SL C 45, 16.2.2013., str 13.
theoretical transhipment output with existing layout and use of handling techniques and process technology
Teoretski rezultat pretovara s postojećim izgledom i korištenjem tehnika prihvata i otpreme i procesne tehnologije.
theoretical transhipment output of the new terminals after finalisation of the first stage of construction
Teoretski rezultat pretovara novih terminala nakon dovršetka prve faze izgradnje.
International Union for Road-Rail Combined Transport:
Međunarodna unija za cestovno-željeznički kombinirani prijevoz:
http://www.uirr.com/en/media-centre/annual-reports/annual-reports/mediacentre/516-annual-report-2011.html
http://www.uirr.com/en/media-centre/annual-reports/annual-reports/mediacentre/516-annual-report-2011.html.
International Union of Railways:
Međunarodna željeznička unija:
http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/2012_report_on_combined_transport_in_europe.pdf
http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/2012_report_on_combined_transport_in_europe.pdf.
See, inter alia, Case C-82/01P Aéroports de Paris [2002] ECR I-9297 and Cases T-443/08 and T-445/08 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission, not yet published in the European Court Reports.
Vidjeti, između ostalog, Predmet C-82/01P Aéroports de Paris [2002] ECR I-9297 i Predmete T-443/08 i T-445/08 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission, koji još nisu objavljeni u izvještajima Europskog suda.
See, in particular, Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11;
Vidjeti posebno Predmet 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, stavak 11.;
Case C-53/00 Ferring [2001] ECR I-9067, paragraph 21;
Predmet C-53/00 Ferring [2001] ECR I-9067, stavak 21.;
and Case C-372/97 Italy v Commission [2004] ECR I-3679, paragraph 44.
i Predmet C-372/97 Italy v Commission [2004] ECR I-3679, stavak 44.
Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717.
Predmet T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717.
See Commission Decision of 31 January 2001 in Case N 597/2000, OJ C 102, 31.3.2001, p. 8;
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 31. siječnja 2001. u Predmetu br. 597/2000, SL C 102, 31.3.2001., str. 8.;
Commission Decision of 14 September 2001 in Case N 208/2000, OJ C 315, 4.1.2000, p. 21;
Odluku Komisije od 14. rujna 2001. u Predmetu br. 208/2000, SL C 315, 4.1.2000., str. 21.;
Commission Decision of 15 November 2000 in Case N 755/1999, OJ C 71, 3.3.2001, p. 17 and 19 ;
Odluku Komisije od 15. studenoga 2000. u Predmetu br. 755/1999, SL C 71, 3.3.2001., str. 17. i 19.;
Commission Decision of 11 November 2001 in Case N 550/01, OJ C 24, 26.1.2002, p. 2.
Odluku Komisije od 11. studenoga 2001. u Predmetu br. 550/01, SL C 24, 26.1.2002., str. 2.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
Predmet C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
See Commission Decision of 11 February 2009 in Case N 651/08 — Combinant multimodal container terminal (EFRO), OJ C 60, 14.3.2009, p. 4.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 11. veljače 2009. u Predmetu br. 651/08 – Combinant multimodal container terminal (EFRO), SL C 60, 14.3.2009., str. 4.
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Uredba (EZ) br. 1370/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. listopada 2007. o uslugama javnog željezničkog i cestovnog prijevoza putnika i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba Vijeća (EEZ) br. 1191/69 i 1107/70 (SL L 315, 3.12.2007., str. 1.).
Case C-156/77 Commission v Belgium [1978] ECR I-1881, paragraph 10.
Predmet C-156/77 Commission v Belgium [1978] ECR I-1881, stavak 10.
See Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 in Case C 17/10, Firmin srl, OJ C 278, 15.10.2010, p. 28.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 20. srpnja 2010. u Predmetu C 17/10 Firmin srl, SL C 278, 15.10.2010., str. 28.
Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States (OJ L 368, 17.12.1992, p. 38).
Direktiva Vijeća 92/106/EEZ od 7. prosinca 1992. o utvrđivanju zajedničkih pravila za određene vrste kombiniranog prijevoza robe između država članica (SL L 368, 17.12.1992., str. 38.).
Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area — Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system, COM(2011)144 of 28.3.2011.
Plan za jedinstveni europski prometni prostor – prema konkurentnom i učinkovitom sustavu prometa, COM(2011)144 od 28.3.2011.
Communication ‘A European Economic Recovery Plan’, COM(2008) 800 final, 26.11.2008.
Priopćenje „Plan europskog gospodarskog oporavka”, COM(2008) 800 završna verzija, 26.11.2008.
Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community's railways (OJ L 237, 24.8.1991, p. 25).
Direktiva Vijeća 91/440/EEZ od 29. srpnja 1991. o razvoju željeznica Zajednice (SL L 237, 24.8.1991., str. 25.).
COM(2011) 650 final, OJ C 37, 10.2.2012, p. 16.
COM(2011) 650 završna verzija, SL C 37, 10.2.2012., str. 16.
See Commission Decision of 31 January 2001 in Case N 597/2000, Netherlands — Subsidieregeling voor bijzondere bedrijfsaansluitingen op vaarwegen, Commission Decision of 14 September 2001 in Case N 208/2000, Netherlands — SOIT, Commission Decision of 15 November 2000 in Case N 755/1999, Italy — Bolzano, and Commission Decision of 20 December 2010 in Case N 490/2010, Belgium — Verlenging van steunregeling N 550/2001 inzake publiek-private samenwerking voor de bouw van laad- en losinstallaties langs de waterwegen in het Vlaams Gewest.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 31. siječnja 2001. u Predmetu N 597/2000, Nizozemska – Subsidieregeling voor bijzondere bedrijfsaansluitingen op vaarwegen, Odluku Komisije od 14. rujna 2001. u Predmetu N 208/2000, Nizozemska – SOIT, Odluku Komisije od 15. studenoga 2000. u Predmetu N 755/1999, Italija – Bolzano, i Odluku Komisije od 20. prosinca 2010. u Predmetu N 490/2010, Belgija – Verlenging van steunregeling N 550/2001 inzake publiek-private samenwerking voor de bouw van laad- en losinstallaties langs de waterwegen in het Vlaams Gewest.
In September 2012, the interest on long-term public debt in Slovakia was 4,2 %, see ECB, http://www.ecb.int/stats/money/long/html/index.en.html
U rujnu 2012. godine, kamata na dugoročni javni dug u Slovačkoj iznosila je 4,2 %, vidjeti ESB, http://www.ecb.int/stats/money/long/html/index.en.html.
In its decision of 9 November 2011 in Case SA.32632 (2011/N) ETGE, OJ C 82, 21.3.2012, p. 2, paragraph 15, the Commission refers to an attraction radius of 35 km in an area with a high density of terminals (Belgian-Dutch border).
U svojoj odluci od 9. studenoga 2011. u Predmetu SA.32632 (2011/N) ETGE, SL C 82, 21.3.2012., str. 2., stavak 15., Komisija se poziva na promjer gravitiranja od 35 km u području s visokom gustoćom terminala (belgijsko-nizozemska granica).
The Slovak authorities reckon on a catchment area of 100 km.
Slovačka tijela računaju na područje zahvata od 100 km.
In the Prague area there are 7 terminals operating within an attraction radius of 70 km:
U području Praga nalazi se 7 terminala koji djeluju unutar promjera gravitiranja od 70 km:
2 large terminals in Prague, 2 in Mělník (40 km) and 3 in Lovosice (70 km).
2 velika terminala u Pragu, 2 u Mělníku (40 km) i 3 u Lovosicama (70 km).
The Commission received further information from Metrans by e-mail dated 9 June 2011.
Komisija je zaprimila dodatne informacije od Metransa putem elektroničke pošte od 9. lipnja 2011.
The complaint was registered as case SA.32828.
Prigovor je upisan kao Predmet SA.32828.
The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] on 16 February 2013.
Odluka o pokretanju postupka je objavljena u Službenom listu Europske unije [2]16. veljače 2013.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question within one month of the publication date.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strane da podnesu svoje primjedbe na predmetne mjere u roku jednog mjeseca od datuma objave.
On 7 March 2013 the Commission granted WienCont an extension until 18 March 2013.
Komisija je 7. ožujka 2013. WienContu odobrila produljenje do 18. ožujka 2013.
The Commission received the comments on the opening decision from WienCont on 18 March 2013.
Komisija je od WienConta zaprimila primjedbe na odluku o pokretanju postupka 18. ožujka 2013.
Lastly, Slovakia states that it will apply to its public intermodal terminal Articles 31 and 56(9) of Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], which will have to be transposed into national law by 16 June 2015.
Slovačka na kraju navodi da će na svoj javni intermodalni terminal primijeniti članke 31. i 56. stavak 9. Direktive 2012/34/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [5], koje je dužna prenijeti u nacionalno pravo do 16. lipnja 2015.
According to the Slovak authorities these rules will provide for an adequate regulatory framework that will reduce the effect of taking over existing customers from existing terminals.
Prema slovačkim tijelima ta pravila će predvidjeti odgovarajući regulatorni okvir koji će umanjiti učinak preuzimanja postojećih klijenata s postojećih terminala.