natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of this, it is considered appropriate to remove the footnote requesting evaluation according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for this substance.
Stoga je primjereno ukloniti bilješku kojom se zahtjeva ocjena te tvari u skladu s člankom 12. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005.
Sodium hydrogen carbonate is approved as basic substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Natrijev hidrogenkarbonat odobren je kao osnovna tvar u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [5].
In view of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 [6], the Commission considers that the inclusion of that substance in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is appropriate.
Uzimajući u obzir Provedbenu uredbu Komisije (EU) 2015/2069 [6], Komisija smatra da je primjereno tu tvar uvrstiti u Prilog IV. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
As regards rescalure, the Authority concluded [7] that the inclusion of that substance in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is appropriate.
U pogledu reskalura Agencija je zaključila [7] da je primjereno tu tvar uvrstiti u Prilog IV. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
As regards Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040 and Beauveria bassiana strain GHA [8] the Authority could not conclude on the dietary risk assessment for consumers as some information was not available and further consideration by risk managers was necessary.
U pogledu Beauveria bassiana soj ATCC 74040 i Beauveria bassiana soj GHA [8] Agencija nije mogla donijeti zaključak o prehrambenom riziku za potrošače jer određene informacije nisu bile dostupne te je bilo potrebno da osobe koje upravljaju rizikom izvrše daljnje razmatranje.
Such further consideration was reflected in the respective review reports [9] [10] which concluded that the risk to humans through metabolites from these substances is negligible.
Daljnja razmatranja dostupna su u odgovarajućim izvješćima o pregledu [9] [10] u kojima je zaključeno da je rizik za ljude povezan s metabolitima tih tvari zanemariv.
In view of those conclusions, the Commission considers that the inclusion of those substances in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is appropriate.
Na temelju tih zaključaka Komisija smatra da je primjereno te tvari uvrstiti u Prilog IV. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Cydia pomonella granulovirus.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane; Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od pesticida s aktivnom tvari Cydia pomonella granulovirus.
EFSA Journal 2012;10(4):2655.
EFSA Journal 2012.; 10(4):2655.
[40 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2655.
(str. 40.) doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2655.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance calcium carbide.
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane; Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od pesticida s aktivnom tvari kalcijev karbid.
EFSA Journal 2011;9(10):2419.
EFSA Journal 2011.; 9(10):2419.
[48 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2419.
(str. 48.) doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2419.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 of 17 November 2015 approving the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ L 301, 18.11.2015, p. 42).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2069 od 17. studenoga 2015. o odobravanju osnovne tvari natrijev hidrogenkarbonat u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja i o izmjeni Priloga Provedbenoj uredbi Komisije (EU) br. 540/2011 (SL L 301, 18.11.2015., str. 42.).
EFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4031, 40 pp.
EFSA Journal 2015.; 13(2):4031, str. 40.
Review report for the active substance Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040 finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 11 July 2008 in view of the inclusion of Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040 in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Završna verzija izvješća o pregledu za aktivnu tvar Beauveria bassiana soj ATCC 74040 donesena na sastanku Stalnog odbora za prehrambeni lanac i zdravlje životinja održanom 11. srpnja 2008. s obzirom na uvrštenje Beauveria bassiana soj ATCC 74040 u Prilog I. Direktivi 91/414/EEZ.
SANCO/1546/08 — rev. 5, 11 July 2014.
SANCO/1546/08 – rev. 5, 11. srpnja 2014.
Review report for the active substance Beauveria bassiana strain GHA finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 11 July 2008 in view of the inclusion of Beauveria bassiana strain GHA in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Završna verzija izvješća o pregledu za aktivnu tvar Beauveria bassiana soj GHA donesena na sastanku Stalnog odbora za prehrambeni lanac i zdravlje životinja održanom 11. srpnja 2008. s obzirom na uvrštenje Beauveria bassiana soj GHA u Prilog I. Direktivi 91/414/EEZ.
SANCO/1547/08 — rev. 5, 11 July 2014.
SANCO/1547/08 – rev. 5, 11. srpnja 2014.
Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is amended as follows.
Prilog IV. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 mijenja se kako slijedi:
The entries ‘Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV)’, ‘calcium carbide’, ‘sodium hydrogen carbonate’, ‘rescalure’, ‘Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040’ and ‘Beauveria bassiana strain GHA’ are inserted, in alphabetical order.
Unosi „Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV)”, „kalcijev karbid”, „natrijev hidrogenkarbonat”, „reskalur”, „Beauveria bassiana soj ATCC 74040” i „Beauveria bassiana soj GH” umeću se abecednim redom.
The reference to footnote 1 after the entry ‘Potassium Iodide’ is deleted.
Upućivanje na bilješku 1. nakon unosa „Kalijev jodid” briše se.
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance rescalure.
Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od pesticida s aktivnom tvari reskalur.
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substances Beauveria bassiana strains ATCC-74040 and GHA.
Zaključak o stručnom pregledu procjene rizika od pesticida s aktivnom tvari Beauveria bassiana soj ATCC-74040 i soj GHA.
EFSA Journal 2013;11(1):3031. 44 pp.
EFSA Journal 2013.; 11(1):3031. str. 44.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/440
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/440
amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for atrazine in or on certain products
o izmjeni priloga II., III. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu maksimalnih razina ostataka za atrazin u ili na određenim proizvodima
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular Article 14(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 17 and Article 49(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 396/2005 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 23. veljače 2005. o maksimalnim razinama ostataka pesticida u ili na hrani i hrani za životinje biljnog i životinjskog podrijetla i o izmjeni Direktive Vijeća 91/414/EEZ [1], a posebno njezin članak 14. stavak 1. točku (a) u vezi s člankom 17. i člankom 49. stavkom 2.,
For atrazine, maximum residue limits (MRLs) were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Maksimalne razine ostataka (MRO-ovi) za atrazin utvrđene su u Prilogu II. i dijelu B Priloga III. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005.
All existing authorisations for plant protection products containing atrazine have been revoked.
Sva su postojeća odobrenja za sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju atrazin ukinuta.
In accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the MRLs set out for that active substance in Annexes II and III should be deleted.
U skladu s člankom 17. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 MRO-ove utvrđene za tu aktivnu tvar u prilozima II. i III. trebalo bi izbrisati.
In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the Commission requested the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, to provide a scientific opinion on the temporary MRLs, which were set for cereals, following an import tolerance request made by Argentina.
U skladu s člankom 43. Uredbe (EZ) br. 396/2005 Komisija je od Europske agencije za sigurnost hrane (dalje u tekstu: „Agencija”) zatražila da dostavi znanstveno mišljenje o privremenim MRO-ovima koji su utvrđeni za žitarice nakon zahtjeva Argentine za uvoznu tolerancu.
Based on residue trials submitted by the applicant in support of the use of atrazine on maize in accordance with Argentinian Good Agricultural Practices, the Authority concluded [2] that the MRLs for atrazine in cereals should be lowered to a level of 0,05 mg/kg.
Na temelju ispitivanja ostataka koje je podnositelj zahtjeva dostavio u prilog uporabe atrazina na kukuruzu u skladu s argentinskom dobrom poljoprivrednom praksom Agencija je zaključila [2] da bi se MRO-ovi za atrazin u žitaricama trebali sniziti na razinu od 0,05 mg/kg.
Such level corresponds to the existing relevant limit of determination for atrazine in products of plant origin.
Ta razina odgovara postojećoj relevantnoj granici određivanja za atrazin u proizvodima biljnog podrijetla.
The proposed MRLs do not pose a consumer health risk for the European consumers.
Predloženi MRO-ovi ne predstavljaju rizik za zdravlje europskih potrošača.
In order to allow for the normal marketing, processing and consumption of products, this Regulation should provide for a transitional arrangement for products which have been produced before the modification of the MRLs made by this Regulation and for which information shows that a high level of consumer protection is maintained.
Kako bi se omogućilo uobičajeno stavljanje na tržište, prerada i potrošnja proizvoda, ovom Uredbom trebalo bi predvidjeti prijelazne odredbe za proizvode koji su proizvedeni prije izmjene MRO-ova ovom Uredbom i za koje postoje podatci kojima se pokazuje da je zadržana visoka razina zaštite potrošača.
Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to products which were produced before 13 October 2016.
Uredba (EZ) br. 396/2005 kako je glasila prije nego što je izmijenjena ovom Uredbom nastavlja se primjenjivati na proizvode koji su proizvedeni prije 13. listopada 2016.
It shall apply from 13 October 2016.
Primjenjuje se od 13. listopada 2016.
Reasoned opinion on the setting of a new maximum residue level for atrazine in cereals.
Obrazloženo mišljenje o utvrđivanju nove maksimalne razine ostataka za atrazin u žitaricama.
EFSA Journal 2015;13(6):4126 [21 pp.].
EFSA Journal 2015.;13(6):4126 [21 str.].
Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are amended as follows.
Prilozi II., III. i V. Uredbi (EZ) br. 396/2005 mijenjaju se kako slijedi:
In Annex II, the column for atrazine is deleted.
U Prilogu II. briše se stupac koji se odnosi na atrazin.
In Part B of Annex III, the column for atrazine is deleted.
U dijelu B Priloga III. briše se stupac koji se odnosi na atrazin.
In Annex V, the following column for atrazine is added:
U Prilogu V. dodaje se sljedeći stupac za atrazin:
Atrazine (F)
Atrazin (F)
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/441
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/441
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of Steviol glycosides (E 960) as a sweetener in mustard
o izmjeni Priloga II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća u pogledu uporabe steviol glikozida (E 960) kao sladila u gorušici (senfu)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 [1] of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives, and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 1333/2008 [1] Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 16. prosinca 2008. o prehrambenim aditivima, a posebno njezin članak 10. stavak 3.,
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 lays down a Union list of food additives approved for use in food and their conditions of use.
U Prilogu II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 utvrđuje se popis prehrambenih aditiva Unije odobrenih za uporabu u hrani te uvjeti njihove uporabe.
That list may be updated in accordance with the common procedure referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] either on the initiative of the Commission or following an application.
Taj se popis može ažurirati u skladu sa zajedničkim postupkom iz članka 3. stavka 1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1331/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [2] na poticaj Komisije ili nakon podnošenja zahtjeva.
On 23 January 2015 an application was submitted for authorisation of the use of steviol glycosides (E 960) as a sweetener in mustard.
Dana 23. siječnja 2015. podnesen je zahtjev za odobrenje uporabe steviol glikozida (E 960) kao sladila u gorušici (senfu).
Steviol glycosides are non-caloric sweet-tasting constituents which may be used to replace sucrose in the production of mustard thus allowing for an extension of its shelf life and its microbiological stability (decreasing the content of sugar prevents the process of fermentation for which sugar is a substrate) whilst retaining the demanded organoleptic properties of the product.
Steviol glikozidi nekalorični su sastojci slatka okusa koji se mogu upotrebljavati kao zamjena za saharozu u proizvodnji gorušice (senfa), čime se produljuju njezin rok trajanja i mikrobiološka stabilnost (smanjenjem udjela šećera sprječava se proces vrenja za koje je podloga šećer) te istodobno zadržavaju tražena organoleptička svojstva proizvoda.
Permitting steviol glycosides in mustard will make it possible to widen the assortment of this product by means of a product containing a sweetener different than those applied hitherto and having slightly other flavour properties.
Dopuštenjem uporabe steviol glikozida u gorušici (senfu) omogućit će se proširenje asortimana tog proizvoda s pomoću proizvoda koji sadržava sladilo različito od dosad primjenjivanih sladila i nešto drukčijeg okusa.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) evaluated the safety of steviol glycosides, extracted from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant, as a sweetener and expressed its opinion on 14 April 2010 [3].
Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane („Agencija”) ocijenila je sigurnost steviol glikozida ekstrahiranih iz listova biljke Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni kao sladila te izrazila svoje mišljenje 14. travnja 2010.
The Authority established an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for steviol glycosides, expressed as steviol equivalents, of 4 mg/kg body weight/day.
Agencija je utvrdila prihvatljivi dnevni unos (PDU) za steviol glikozide od 4 mg/kg tjelesne mase na dan, izražen kao ekvivalenti steviola.
Authorising this sweetener in mustard at 120 mg/kg (as steviol equivalents) would lead to an increase in the intake of E960 within the following limits: between 0 up to 0,133 % of the ADI in the case of mean consumption and between 0 up to 1,143 % of the ADI in the case of high level consumption.
Odobravanje ovog sladila u gorušici (senfu) u količini od 120 mg/kg (kao ekvivalenti steviola) dovelo bi do povećanja unosa E 960 unutar sljedećih ograničenja: od 0 do 0,133 % PDU-a u slučaju srednje razine potrošnje i od 0 do 1,143 % PDU-a u slučaju visoke razine potrošnje.
This is considered to be an additional negligible exposure of the consumer and therefore is not of safety concern.
To se smatra dodatnom zanemarivom izloženosti potrošača te stoga ne predstavlja sigurnosni rizik.
Pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008, the Commission is to seek the opinion of ‘the Authority’ in order to update the Union list of food additives set out in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, except where that update is not liable to have an effect on human health.
U skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1331/2008 Komisija je dužna zatražiti mišljenje Agencije kako bi ažurirala popis prehrambenih aditiva Unije iz Priloga II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008, osim ako to ažuriranje vjerojatno neće imati utjecaj na zdravlje ljudi.
Since the authorisation of use of steviol glycosides (E 960) as a sweetener in mustard constitutes an update of that list which is not liable to have an effect on human health, it is not necessary to seek the opinion of the Authority.
Budući da se odobrenje uporabe steviol glikozida (E 960) kao sladila u gorušici (senfu) smatra ažuriranjem tog popisa koje vjerojatno neće imati utjecaj na zdravlje ljudi, nije potrebno zatražiti mišljenje Agencije.
Therefore, it is appropriate to authorise the use of steviol glycosides (E 960) as a sweetener added to mustard (food subcategory 12.4) at maximum level of 120 mg/kg.
Stoga je primjereno odobriti uporabu steviol glikozida (E 960) kao sladila dodanoga gorušici (senfu) (potkategorija hrane 12.4.) u najvećoj razini od 120 mg/kg.
Therefore, Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 should be amended accordingly.
Prilog II. Uredbi (EZ) br. 1333/2008 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
EFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1537.
EFSA Journal 2010.; 8(4):1537.
in food subcategory 12.4 Mustard, the following entry is inserted after the entry for E 959:
U potkategoriji hrane 12.4. Gorušica (senf) nakon unosa E 959 umeće se sljedeći unos:
‘E 960
„E 960
the following footnote is added:
Dodaje se sljedeća bilješka:
Expressed as steviol equivalents’.
Izraženi kao ekvivalenti steviola”.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/442
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/442
Section 2 of Chapter II of that Regulation deals with the determination and elimination of surplus quantities of sugar present in Croatia at the date of its accession.
Poglavlje II. odjeljak 2. te Uredbe odnosi se na određivanje i uklanjanje viška količina šećera prisutnog u Hrvatskoj na dan njezina pristupanja.
It also fixes reference periods to be used in the calculation of charges for Croatia if surplus sugar quantities are not eliminated.
Osim toga, utvrđuju se referentna razdoblja koja će se uzeti u obzir pri izračunu iznosa koji se naplaćuje Hrvatskoj ako se višak količina ne ukloni.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1345/2014 [3] determined the surplus quantities of sugar in Croatia stockpiled prior to its accession and which have to be eliminated from the Union market at the expense of Croatia in accordance with the deadlines set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1407 [4].
Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 1345/2014 [3] određen je višak količina šećera skladištenog u Hrvatskoj prije njezina pristupanja koji se mora ukloniti s tržišta Unije na trošak Hrvatske u skladu s rokovima iz Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 kako je izmijenjena Provedbenom uredbom (EU) 2015/1407 [4].
By its letter of 26 January 2016, Croatia has informed the Commission that, while it does not question the obligation to ensure the elimination of the surplus sugar quantities, as determined by the Commission, the unforeseen procedural difficulties in the implementation of the obligation to compel the operators concerned to eliminate those surplus quantities that led to the extension of the deadlines for elimination could not be fully solved and that some short additional time is needed.
U dopisu od 26. siječnja 2016. Hrvatska je obavijestila Komisiju da, iako ne dovodi u pitanje obvezu uklanjanja viška količina šećera, kako ju je utvrdila Komisija, nepredviđene postupovne poteškoće u provedbi obveze da osigura da predmetni gospodarski subjekti uklone taj višak količina, koje su dovele do produljenja rokova za uklanjanje, nisu se mogle u potpunosti riješiti te je potrebno određeno kraće dodatno vrijeme.
It is therefore appropriate to extend the deadlines provided for by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 by 4 months.
Stoga je primjereno produljiti rokove predviđene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 170/2013 za četiri mjeseca.
in Article 9(1), ‘31 March 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2016’;
U članku 9. stavku 1. datum „31. ožujka 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. srpnja 2016.”
‘31 March 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2016’;
datum „31. ožujka 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. srpnja 2016.”;
‘30 November 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2017’;
datum „30. studenoga 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. ožujka 2017.”
in paragraph 1, ‘30 June 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 October 2016’;
u stavku 1., datum „30. lipnja 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. listopada 2016.”;
in the fourth subparagraph of paragraph 2, ‘31 March 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2016’;
u stavku 2. četvrtom podstavku, datum „31. ožujka 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. srpnja 2016.”
in paragraph 1, ‘31 July 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 November 2016’;
u stavku 1., datum „31. srpnja 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „30. studenoga 2016.”;
in the first subparagraph, ‘31 March 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2016’;
i. u prvom podstavku, datum „31. ožujka 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. srpnja 2016.”;
in the second subparagraph, ‘30 November 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2017’;
u drugom podstavku, datum „30. studenoga 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. ožujka 2017.”;
in the third subparagraph, ‘30 September 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 January 2017’.
u trećem podstavku, datum „30. rujna 2016.” zamjenjuje se datumom „31. siječnja 2017.”
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1407 of 19 August 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of Croatia (OJ L 219, 20.8.2015, p. 1).
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1407 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 o utvrđivanju prijelaznih mjera u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske (SL L 219, 20.8.2015., str. 1.).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/443
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/443
The occurrence and relevance of recent food incidents notified through the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed, the findings of audits to third countries carried out by the Directorate for Health and Food Audits and Analysis of the Commission Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, as well as the quarterly reports on consignments of feed and food of non-animal origin submitted by Member States to the Commission in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 indicate that the list should be amended.
Pojava i važnost nedavnih incidenata u vezi s hranom prijavljenih s pomoću sustava brzog uzbunjivanja za hranu i hranu za životinje, nalazi revizija u trećim zemljama koje je provela Uprava za revizije i analize u području zdravlja i hrane Komisijine Glavne uprave za zdravlje i sigurnost hrane te tromjesečna izvješća o pošiljkama hrane za životinje i hrane neživotinjskoga podrijetla koje države članice podnose Komisiji u skladu s člankom 15. Uredbe (EZ) br. 669/2009 upućuju na to da bi taj popis trebalo izmijeniti.
In particular, for consignments of groundnuts and derived products originating from Madagascar, palm oil from Ghana, and lemons from Turkey the relevant sources of information indicate the emergence of new risks requiring the introduction of an increased level of official controls.
Posebice za pošiljke kikirikija i od njega dobivenih proizvoda podrijetlom iz Madagaskara, palmina ulja iz Gane i limuna iz Turske relevantni izvori informacija upućuju na pojavu novih rizika koji opravdavaju uvođenje povećane razine službenih kontrola.
The list should also be amended by deleting the entries for commodities for which the available information indicates an overall satisfactory degree of compliance with the relevant safety requirements provided for in Union legislation and for which an increased level of official controls is therefore no longer justified.
Osim toga popis bi trebalo izmijeniti brisanjem unosâ za robu za koju raspoložive informacije upućuju na sveukupno zadovoljavajući stupanj sukladnosti s relevantnim sigurnosnim zahtjevima predviđenima zakonodavstvom Unije i za koje povećana razina službenih kontrola stoga više nije opravdana.