natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They separately identified this capacity as ‘idle capacity’ which should not be counted as capacity available for use.
Taj je kapacitet odvojeno identificiran kao „neiskorišteni kapacitet” koji se ne bi trebao smatrati kapacitetom dostupnim za upotrebu.
The capacity utilisation figures in Table 4 were therefore understated.
Podaci o iskorištenosti kapaciteta u tablici 4. stoga su bili podcijenjeni.
After close scrutiny of this resubmitted data, it was accepted and Table 4 is restated below.
Nakon temeljitog pregleda tih ponovno dostavljenih podataka, oni su prihvaćeni i tablica 4. ponovno je sastavljena u nastavku teksta.
The capacity utilisation rate, which had been from 43 % to 41 % in the provisional Regulation, was now 46 % to 55 %.
Stopa iskorištenosti kapaciteta koja je u privremenoj Uredbi iznosila od 43 % do 41 %, sada je iznosila od 46 % do 55 %.
The Union industry also corrected the production data for 2009 to produce the table below:
Za pripremu tablice u nastavku, industrija Unije ispravila je i podatke o proizvodnji za 2009.:
Recital 103 of the provisional Regulation analysed the previous capacity utilisation data, noting that production increased while capacity remained stable.
U uvodnoj izjavi 103. Privremene uredbe analizirani su prethodni podaci o iskorištenosti kapaciteta, uz napomenu da se proizvodnja povećala dok je kapacitet ostao stabilan.
With the revised data production still increases, but useable capacity decreased during the same period.
Proizvodnja se povećava i prema revidiranim podacima, ali se tijekom istog razdoblja iskoristivi kapacitet smanjio.
This shows that the Union industry was reducing available capacity in face of increased imports from Argentina and Indonesia and thereby reacting to market signals.
To pokazuje da je industrija Unije smanjivala dostupni kapacitet zbog povećanog uvoza iz Argentine i Indonezije i tako reagirala na tržišne signale.
This revised data is now more in line with the public statements of the Union industry and Union producers, stating that during the period under consideration production was stopped in several plants and that the capacity that had been installed was not immediately available for use, or only available for use with significant reinvestment.
Ti revidirani podaci sada su više usklađeni s izvještajima industrije Unije i proizvođača iz Unije u kojima se navodi da je proizvodnja tijekom razmatranog razdoblja bila obustavljena u nekoliko postrojenja i da postavljeni kapacitet nije bio odmah dostupan za upotrebu, ili da je bio dostupan za upotrebu jedino uz značajna dodatna ulaganja.
Several interested parties questioned the revised capacity and capacity utilisation data.
Nekoliko zainteresiranih strana osporavalo je revidirani kapacitet i podatke o iskorištenosti kapaciteta.
However, no alternatives were provided by any interested party.
Međutim, alternativu nije dostavila ni jedna zainteresirana strana.
The revision is based on the revised capacity data provided by the complainant, covering the entire Union industry.
Revizija se temelji na revidiranim podacima o kapacitetu koje je dostavio podnositelj pritužbe i kojima je obuhvaćena cijela industrija Unije.
The revised data was cross-referenced to publicly available data concerning in particular idle capacity as well as capacity of producers that ceased operations due to financial difficulties.
Revidirani podaci povezuju se s javno dostupnim podacima koji se osobito odnose na neiskorišteni kapacitet i kapacitet proizvođača koji su prekinuli djelovanje zbog financijskih poteškoća.
As explained above in Section 6, ‘Macroeconomic indicators’, the revised data provide a more accurate dataset of capacity available to produce biodiesel during the period under consideration than the dataset originally provided and published in the provisional Regulation.
Kao što je prethodno objašnjeno u odjeljku 6. „Makroekonomski pokazatelji”, revidiranim podacima osiguravaju se točniji potpuni podaci o kapacitetu dostupnom za proizvodnju biodizela tijekom razmatranog razdoblja od potpunih podataka koji su izvorno dostavljeni i objavljeni privremenom Uredbom.
One interested party stated that the Union industry was not injured, as production volumes rose in line with consumption.
Jedna zainteresirana strana tvrdila je da industrija Unije nije pretrpjela štetu jer je obujam proizvodnje rastao u skladu s potrošnjom.
This argument is rejected, as other important injury indicators clearly point to the existence of injury, in particular the loss of market share to imports from the countries concerned and the reduced profitability trend leading to losses.
Taj se argument odbija jer drugi važni pokazatelji štete jasno pokazuju da šteta postoji, a posebno gubitak tržišnog udjela zbog uvoza iz dotičnih zemalja i smanjeno kretanje profitabilnosti koje je dovelo do gubitaka.
Another interested party argued that the Union industry was not injured if comparing trends only between 2011 and the IP as opposed to comparing the trends during the period from 1 January 2009 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Jedna druga zainteresirana strana tvrdila je da industrija Unije nije pretrpjela štetu ako se usporede samo kretanja između 2011. i RIP-a, za razliku od usporedbe kretanja tijekom razdoblja od 1. siječnja 2009. do kraja RIP-a („razmatrano razdoblje”).
Given that the IP covers half of 2011, a comparison between 2011 and IP is not accurate.
S obzirom na to da je RIP-om obuhvaćena polovina 2011. godine, usporedba između 2011. i RIP-a nije točna.
Besides, for a comparison to be meaningful it is necessary to examine the trends relevant for the injury assessment during a period which is long enough as it was done in the present case.
Osim toga, da bi usporedba bila značajna, njome se moraju ispitati kretanja bitna za ocjenu štete tijekom dovoljno dugog razdoblja, kako je i učinjeno u ovom slučaju.
The same interested party noted that the Commission had not published the total sales value of the Union industry in the provisional Regulation and requested that this figure be published.
Ista ta zainteresirana strana napomenula je da Komisija u privremenoj Uredbi nije objavila ukupnu prodajnu vrijednost industrije Unije i zahtijevala da se ta brojka objavi.
However, all relevant factors mentioned in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation were examined, allowing a full assessment of injury.
Međutim, ispitani su svi bitni čimbenici navedeni u članku 3. stavku 5. Osnovne uredbe, čime je omogućena potpuna ocjena štete.
Sales value was collected, and verified, from sampled companies, who were representative of the Union industry as a whole.
Od trgovačkih društava u uzorku koja su bila reprezentativna za industriju Unije u cjelini prikupljeni su i potvrđeni podaci o prodajnoj vrijednosti.
The same party also noted that the Union industry was able to increase employment and therefore there was no negative effect on the Union industry during the period of investigation.
Ista ta strana napomenula je i da je industrija Unije mogla povećati zaposlenost zbog čega nije bilo negativnog utjecaja na industriju Unije tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
However, as explained in recital 106 of the provisional Regulation, employment in this capital intensive industry is relatively low.
Međutim, kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 106. Privremene uredbe, zaposlenost u ovoj kapitalno intenzivnoj industriji relativno je niska.
Therefore, small variations in the numbers can cause a large movement in the indexed data.
Zbog toga male razlike u brojkama mogu prouzročiti veliko kretanje u indeksiranim podacima.
The increase in overall employment does not negate the injury suffered by the Union industry as shown by other indicators.
Porast ukupne zaposlenosti ne negira štetu koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije kako je vidljivo iz ostalih pokazatelja.
In the absence of any further comments, recitals 103 to 110 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
U izostanku daljnjih komentara potvrđuju se uvodne izjave 103. do 110. Privremene uredbe.
As set out in recital 102 of the provisional Regulation, the following microeconomic indicators were analysed, based on data verified at the sampled Union producers: average unit prices, unit cost, labour costs, inventories, profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investments and ability to raise capital.
Kako je određeno u uvodnoj izjavi 102. Privremene uredbe, analizirani su sljedeći mikroekonomski pokazatelji na temelju podataka potvrđenih kod proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku: prosječne jedinične cijene, jedinični trošak, troškovi rada, zalihe, profitabilnost, novčani tok, ulaganja, povrat ulaganja i sposobnost prikupljanja kapitala.
In the absence of any relevant comments, recitals 111 to 117 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
U izostanku drugih bitnih komentara potvrđuju se uvodne izjave 111. do 117. Privremene uredbe.
Several parties contested the conclusion on injury put forward in the provisional Regulation on the basis that between the year 2011 and the IP some indicators appeared to have improved.
Nekoliko strana osporavalo je zaključak o šteti iznesen u privremenoj Uredbi na temelju toga što se činilo da su se neki pokazatelji popravili između 2011. godine i RIP-a.
While it is true that some indicators showed an upward trend between 2011 and the IP (e.g., production and sales), the industry was not in a position to pass on cost increases during this period as noted in recital 111 of the provisional Regulation.
Iako je istina da su neki pokazatelji između 2011. i RIP-a pokazivali pozitivno kretanje (npr. proizvodnja i prodaja), industrija nije mogla prenijeti porast troškova tijekom tog razdoblja kako je napomenuto u uvodnoj izjavi 111. Privremene uredbe.
This resulted in a further worsening of the industry’s position from losses of 0,2 % in 2011 to losses of 2,5 % in the IP.
To je uzrokovalo daljnje pogoršanje stanja industrije s gubitaka od 0,2 % u 2011. na gubitke od 2,5 % u RIP-u.
Therefore, it is considered that, even if the injury analysis were to be limited to the period 2011-IP, the industry would still be found to have suffered material injury.
Stoga se zaključuje da bi, čak i da je analiza štete bila ograničena na razdoblje od 2011. do RIP-a, ipak bilo utvrđeno da je industrija pretrpjela materijalnu štetu.
In the absence of other comments, recitals 118 to 120 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
U izostanku drugih komentara potvrđuju se uvodne izjave 118. do 120. Privremene uredbe.
Effect of the dumped imports
Učinak dampinškog uvoza
One interested party claimed that imports from Argentina could not be a cause of injury, as import volumes have remained stable from 2010 to the end of the IP, decreasing slightly from 2011 to the end of the IP.
Jedna je zainteresirana strana tvrdila da uvoz iz Argentine ne može biti uzrok štete jer je obujam uvoza ostao stabilan od 2010. do kraja RIP-a, i blago se smanjio od 2011. do kraja RIP-a.
This data was taken from Table 2 of the provisional Regulation and is accurate.
Ti podaci uzeti su iz tablice 2. Privremene uredbe i točni su.
However the Commission’s analysis runs from the start of the period considered to the end of the IP and on that basis imports have risen by 48 %, with an increase of 41 % in market share.
Međutim, analizom Komisije obuhvaćeno je razdoblje od početka razmatranog razdoblja do kraja RIP-a, a na temelju toga uvoz se povećao za 48 %, a tržišni udjel za 41 %.
In addition, as explained in recital 90 of the provisional Regulation, not only imports from Argentina but also imports from Indonesia were taken into account.
Osim toga, kako je objašnjeno u uvodnoj izjavi 90. Privremene uredbe, u obzir nije uzet samo uvoz iz Argentine, nego i uvoz iz Indonezije.
Taking a year-on-year price comparison, the same interested party noted that prices of imports from Argentina rose at a faster pace than the sales prices of the Union industry.
Uzimajući usporedbu cijena od godine do godine, ista ta zainteresirana strana napomenula je da su cijene uvoza iz Argentine rasle brže nego prodajne cijene industrije Unije.
However, imports from Argentina still undercut those of the Union industry, which would explain why the Union prices could not rise as quickly.
Međutim, uvoz iz Argentine i dalje je snižavao cijene industrije Unije, čime se može objasniti zašto cijene Unije nisu mogle rasti jednako brzo.
In the absence of any other comments as regards the effect of the dumped imports, recitals 123 to 128 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
U izostanku drugih komentara u vezi s učinkom dampinškog uvoza potvrđuju se uvodne izjave 123. do 128. Privremene uredbe.
Effect of other factors
Učinak drugih čimbenika
Imports from third countries other than the countries concerned
Uvoz iz trećih zemalja koje nisu dotične zemlje
In the absence of comments, the conclusion that imports from other countries did not cause injury, as set out in recital 129 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
U izostanku komentara potvrđuje se zaključak da uvoz iz drugih zemalja nije prouzrokovao štetu kako je utvrđeno u uvodnoj izjavi 129. Privremene uredbe.
Non-dumped imports from the countries concerned
Nedampinški uvoz iz dotičnih zemalja
Following the application of Article 2(5) as mentioned in recitals 38 and 70 above, no non-dumped imports from the countries concerned were found.
Nakon primjene članka 2. stavka 5. kako je prethodno navedeno u uvodnim izjavama 38. i 70., nije bilo nedampinškog uvoza iz dotičnih zemalja.
Therefore, recital 130 of the provisional Regulation is revised accordingly.
Stoga je uvodna izjava 130. Privremene uredbe revidirana u skladu s time.
Other Union producers
Ostali proizvođači iz Unije
In the absence of any comments recital 131 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
U izostanku komentara potvrđuje se uvodna izjava 131. Privremene uredbe.
Imports made by the Union industry
Uvoz koji je vršila industrija Unije
As set out in recitals 132 to 136 of the provisional Regulation, the Union industry imported significant quantities of biodiesel from the countries concerned during the period considered, up to 60 % of all imports in the IP from those countries.
Kako je određeno u uvodnim izjavama 132. do 136. Privremene uredbe, industrija Unije tijekom razmatranog je razdoblja uvozila značajne količine biodizela iz dotičnih zemalja, i do 60 % sveg uvoza iz tih zemalja tijekom RIP-a.
One interested party alleged that these imports, far from being in self-defence, were part of a ‘carefully matured long-term strategy’ by the Union industry to invest in, and source biodiesel from, Argentina.
Jedna zainteresirana strana navela je da taj uvoz nikako nije bio radi vlastite zaštite, nego da je bio dijelom „pažljivo planirane dugoročne strategije” industrije Unije za ulaganje u Argentinu i crpljenje biodizela iz Argentine.
They also allege that there has never been an economic rationale to import soya bean oil into the Union and process it into biodiesel within the Union, and that it is only economically feasible to process the soya bean oil in Argentina and export the resulting biodiesel.
Navela je i da nikad nije bilo gospodarski opravdano uvoziti sojino ulje u Uniju i prerađivati ga u biodizel u Uniji te da je gospodarski izvediva samo prerada sojinog ulja u Argentini te izvoz dobivenog biodizela.
These claims should be rejected.
Te tvrdnje treba odbaciti.
No evidence of such a ‘long-term strategy’ has been provided and this has been denied by the Union industry.
Nisu dostavljeni nikakvi dokazi za takvu „dugoročnu strategiju” i industrija Unije ju je zanijekala.
Clearly if the strategy of the Union industry was to supplement their biodiesel production by producing in Argentina and importing the finished product, it would be nonsensical and illogical to then launch a complaint against such imports.
Ako je strategija industrije Unije bila nadopuniti svoju proizvodnju biodizela proizvodnjom u Argentini i uvozom gotovog proizvoda, očito ne bi imalo smisla ni logike podnijeti pritužbu protiv tog uvoza.
One interested party repeated that the imports of biodiesel by the Union industry, that were made in self-defence, were in fact made as part of a long-term commercial strategy.
Jedna je zainteresirana strana ponovila da je uvoz biodizela, koji je industrija Unije vršila radi vlastite zaštite, zapravo bio dio dugoročne poslovne strategije.
This allegation, which was not substantiated, is rejected.
Taj se navod, koji nije potkrijepljen dokazima, odbacuje.
No evidence beyond mere allegations has been provided of such a strategy.
Osim samih navođenja, nije dostavljen nikakav dokaz o takvoj strategiji.
Also, it would seem illogical for the concerned Union producers to support the complaint and, in some cases, to have increased its capacity in the Union while at the same time have a strategy to fulfil production needs by imports.
Osim toga, ne bi imalo logike da dotični proizvođači Unije podupiru pritužbu i, u nekim slučajevima, povećavaju kapacitet u Uniji, dok istodobno provode strategiju o nadopuni proizvodnih potreba uvozom.
The same interested party also argued that the market share of the Union industry should be calculated by including their imports made in self-defence.
Ta je ista zainteresirana strana tvrdila da je tržišni udjel industrije Unije trebalo izračunati uključujući uvoz koji je vršila radi vlastite zaštite.
This submission was rejected as market share calculations have to reflect the sales of the Union industry of goods they produced themselves and not their trading activities in the finished product made in the face of increasing volumes of dumped imports.
Taj je podnesak odbačen s obzirom na to da izračuni tržišnih udjela moraju odražavati prodaju robe koju je industrija Unije sama proizvela, a ne njezine trgovinske djelatnosti gotovim proizvodom koje obavlja s obzirom na rastući obujam dampinškog uvoza.
The Union industry has also shown that in previous years the importation of soya bean oil — and palm oil — for processing into biodiesel was economically viable.
Industrija Unije pokazala je i da je tijekom prethodnih godina uvoz sojina ulja – i palmina ulja – radi prerade u biodizel bio gospodarski održiv.
No evidence of the contrary was provided by the interested party.
Zainteresirana strana nije dostavila nikakve dokaze koji bi pokazivali suprotno.
Only with the distortive effect of the differential export tax which makes the export of biodiesel cheaper than the raw materials does import of the finished product become economically sensible.
Uvoz gotovog proizvoda postaje gospodarski razuman jedino zbog iskrivljavajućeg učinka različitog oporezivanja kojim izvoz biodizela postaje jeftiniji od sirovina.
One interested party alleged that those imports were a cause of injury because only the Union industry had the capacity to blend the SME from Argentina and PME from Indonesia with Union produced biodiesel for resale to diesel refiners.
Jedna zainteresirana strana tvrdila je da je taj uvoz uzrok štete jer je samo industrija Unije imala kapacitet za miješanje SME-a iz Argentine i PME-a iz Indonezije s biodizelom proizvedenim u Uniji za preprodaju rafinerijama dizela.
That allegation is incorrect.
Taj je argument netočan.
Blending is a simple operation that many trading companies are capable of doing in their storage tanks.
Miješanje je jednostavan postupak koji mnoga društva za trgovinu mogu sama vršiti u svojim spremnicima.
No evidence was provided that only the Union producers are capable of such blending, and the allegation was therefore rejected.
Nisu dostavljeni nikakvi dokazi da su samo proizvođači iz Unije u mogućnosti vršiti takvo miješanje te su stoga ti navodi odbačeni.
One Indonesian exporting producer further claimed that imports by the Union industry were not made in self-defence and compared data for the calendar year 2011 with data from the IP, which contains six months of the same year.
Jedan je indonezijski proizvođač izvoznik dalje tvrdio da industrija Unije ne obavlja uvoz radi vlastite zaštite te je usporedio podatke za kalendarsku godinu 2011. s podacima iz RIP-a u koji se odnosi na šest mjeseci u istoj godini.
A comparison between the two is therefore not accurate without being able to split the IP into two halves.
Usporedba između te dvije skupine podataka nije točna jer se RIP ne može podijeliti na dvije polovice.
Therefore this argument is rejected.
Stoga se ova tvrdnja odbacuje.
In the absence of any other comments as regards the exports by the Union industry, recitals 132 to 136 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
U izostanku drugih komentara u vezi s izvozom industrije Unije potvrđuju se uvodne izjave 132. do 136. Privremene uredbe.
Capacity of the Union industry
Kapacitet industrije Unije
Recitals 137 to 140 of the provisional Regulation noted that the capacity utilisation of the Union industry remained low throughout the period under consideration, but that the situation of the sampled companies deteriorated during the period while their capacity utilisation did not decrease by the same amount.
U uvodnim izjavama 137. do 140. Privremene uredbe napomenuto je da je iskorištenost kapaciteta industrije Unije ostala niska tijekom razmatranog razdoblja, ali da se stanje trgovačkih društava u uzorku pogoršalo tijekom tog razdoblja, dok se njihova iskorištenost kapaciteta nije smanjila u istoj mjeri.
The provisional conclusion was therefore that the low capacity utilisation rate, as a constant feature, was not responsible for the injury caused to the Union industry.
Privremeni je zaključak stoga bio da niska stopa iskorištenosti kapaciteta, kao stalna pojava, nije bila odgovorna za štetu industriji Unije.
One interested party commented on the data in the provisional Regulation, noting that even in the absence of any imports at all capacity utilisation of the Union industry would only have been 53 % during the IP.
Jedna zainteresirana strana komentirala je podatke u privremenoj Uredbi, i napomenula da bi čak i u izostanku bilo kakvog uvoza ukupna iskorištenost kapaciteta industrije Unije tijekom RIP-a iznosila samo 53 %.
It also points to the increase in production capacity from 2009 to the end of the IP which has led to a reduction in capacity utilisation during the period under consideration.
Ukazala je i na porast proizvodnog kapaciteta od 2009. do kraja RIP-a, što je dovelo do smanjenja iskorištenosti kapaciteta tijekom razmatranog razdoblja.
However, the interested party did not provide any evidence to show that this low capacity utilisation was causing injury to such an extent as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the deterioration of the situation of the Union industry.
Međutim, ta zainteresirana strana nije dostavila nikakve dokaze kojima bi pokazala da je ta niska iskorištenost kapaciteta uzrokovala štetu u toj mjeri da prekine uzročno-posljedičnu vezu između dampinškog uvoza i pogoršanja stanja industrije Unije.
Fixed costs represent only a small proportion (roughly 5 %) of total production costs, which shows that the low capacity utilisation was only one factor of injury, but not a decisive one.
Fiksni troškovi predstavljaju tek nizak udjel (oko 5 %) ukupnih troškova proizvodnje, što pokazuje da je niska iskorištenost kapaciteta samo jedan čimbenik štete, ali ne i odlučujući čimbenik.
Also, one of the reasons for this low capacity utilisation rate is the fact that the Union industry, due to the particular market situation, imported the finished product itself.
Osim toga, jedan od razloga za tu nisku stopu iskorištenosti kapaciteta jest činjenica da je industrija Unije zbog specifične tržišne situacije sama uvozila gotovi proizvod.
In addition, following the inclusion of the revised data on capacity and utilisation, the Union industry decreased capacity during the period considered, and increased capacity utilisation, from 46 % to 55 %.
Uz to, nakon što su uključeni revidirani podaci o kapacitetu i iskorištenosti, industrija Unije smanjila je kapacitet tijekom razmatranog razdoblja, i povećala iskorištenost kapaciteta s 46 % na 55 %.