natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. The documents submitted (press articles, sales figures, surveys) showed that the earlier sign, CIALIS, was intensively used before the filing date of the EUTM application, that the products under the mark CIALIS were marketed in several Member States where they enjoyed a consolidated position among the leading brands, and that there was a high degree of recognition when compared with the market leader Viagra.
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. Podnesenom dokumentacijom (članci iz novina, brojčani podatci o prodaji, istraživanja) pokazano je da se raniji žig „CIALIS” intenzivno upotrebljavao prije datuma podnošenja prijave za žig EU-a, da su proizvodi koji nose žig „CIALIS” bili na tržištu u nekoliko država članica u kojima su imali konsolidirani položaj među vodećim robnim markama te da je postojala visoka razina prepoznatljivosti u usporedbi s vodećom markom na tržištu „Viagra”.
Large and constantly growing market share and sales numbers also showed ‘the vast expansion of CIALIS' (para. 55).
Velikim i stalno rastućim tržišnim udjelom te podatcima o prodaji jednako je tako pokazano „veliko širenje žiga ‚CIALIS'” (t. 55.).
Reputation was not sufficiently proven, in particular because none of the documents referred to recognition of the earlier trade mark by the relevant end consumers.
Ugled nije dovoljno detaljno dokazan, osobito jer se nijedan dokument nije odnosio na prepoznatljivost ranijeg žiga među relevantnim krajnjim potrošačima.
Nor was any evidence about the market share of the opponent's goods submitted.
Nisu priloženi ni dokazi o tržišnom udjelu proizvoda podnositelja prigovora.
Information about market share is particularly important in the sector in which the opponent had its core business (handbags, transport items, accessories and clothing), as it is ‘a quite atomized and competitive sector' and ‘there are many different competitors and designers in that product range' (paras 59 to 61).
Informacije o tržišnom udjelu posebno su važne u sektoru u kojem je podnositelj prigovora obavljao svoju osnovnu djelatnost (ručne torbe, predmeti koji se upotrebljavaju u prijevozu, dodatci i odjeća) i koji je „vrlo atomiziran i konkurentan” te „postoje mnogi različiti konkurenti i dizajneri u tom asortimanu proizvoda” (t. 59. - 61.).
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Although, for reasons of force majeure, it was not possible for the earlier trade mark to become well known by traditional methods, that is, through sales of the product, it did become extremely well known as a result of promotional activities, through the trade mark being extensively, continually and constantly publicised in the specialist press and at sector fairs, thereby reaching virtually the whole of the three relevant sectors of the public.
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Iako raniji žig zbog više sile nije mogao postati dobro poznat uporabom tradicionalnih metoda, odnosno prodajom proizvoda, on je ipak postao vrlo dobro poznat putem promidžbenih aktivnosti, odnosno opsežnim oglašavanjem žiga, stalno i neprekidno u specijaliziranim tiskovinama i na sektorskim sajmovima, čime je dospio do gotovo triju cijelih relevantnih sektora javnosti.
The limited presence of the product on the market by no means prevented it from becoming well known by the relevant public that, on the relevant date, FLATZ was the trade mark with which the opponent identified its electronic bingo machines (paras 41, 42, 50 and 51).
Ograničena prisutnost proizvoda na tržištu nikako nije onemogućila da proizvod postane dobro poznat u relevantnoj javnosti te je na relevantni datum žig „FLATZ” bio žig kojim je podnositelj prigovora identificirao svoje elektroničke uređaje za igranje tombole (t. 41., 42., 50. i 51.).
The lack of figures regarding market share held by the trade mark ARENA in the relevant countries was not in itself capable of calling the finding of reputation into question.
Nedostatak brojčanih podataka o tržišnom udjelu žiga „ARENA” u relevantnim zemljama sam po sebi nije bio dostatan da se dovede u pitanje nalaz o ugledu.
First, the list of factors to be taken into consideration in order to ascertain the reputation of an earlier mark only serves to illustrate examples, as all the relevant evidence in the case must be taken into consideration and, second, the other detailed and verifiable evidence submitted by the opponent is already sufficient in itself to prove conclusively the substantial degree of recognition of the ARENA mark amongst the relevant public (para. 59).
Kao prvo, popis čimbenika koje treba uzeti u obzir da bi se utvrdio ugled ranijeg žiga služi samo kao primjer jer se moraju uzeti u obzir svi relevantni dokazi u određenom slučaju, a kao drugo, ostali podrobni i provjerljivi dokazi koje je podnositelj prigovora podnio sami su po sebi dovoljni da bi se definitivno dokazao znatan postotak prepoznatljivosti žiga „ARENA” u relevantnoj javnosti (t. 59.).
If the earlier mark were so well known in the 27 Member States of the EU for TV broadcasting and magazines, it should have been easy for the opponent to provide information about ‘the reach of the mark' just before 2008, when the EUTM application was filed.
Ako je raniji žig bio vrlo dobro poznat u 27 država članica EU-a zbog prikazivanja na televiziji i objavljivanja u časopisima, podnositelju prigovora trebalo bi biti jednostavno pružiti informacije o „dosegu žiga” neposredno prije 2008., kada je podnesena prijava za žig EU-a.
The magazine sales figures did not cover the right period.
Brojčani podatci o prodaji časopisa nisu obuhvaćali točno razdoblje.
Nor did the documents submitted give any indication of the extent to which the public was aware of the mark (paras 16 and 18).
Jednako tako, podnesenim dokumentima nisu se pružili nikakvi pokazatelji opsega svjesnosti javnosti o žigu (t. 16. i 18.).
The evidence submitted showed a particularly impressive duration of use (over 30 years) and geographical extent of use (over seventy-five countries worldwide, including the Member States concerned) for the ARENA brand (para. 55).
Podnesenim dokazima pokazano je vrlo dojmljivo trajanje uporabe (više od 30 godina) i zemljopisni opseg uporabe (više od 75 zemalja diljem svijeta, uključujući predmetne države članice) robne marke „ARENA” (t. 55.).
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (appeal dismissed in 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) The Beatles group was considered to be a group with an exceptional reputation, lasting for more than 40 years (para. 36).
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (žalba odbačena u predmetu od 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) Skupina Beatles smatra se skupinom s iznimnim ugledom koji traje više od 40 godina (t. 36.).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Evidence of the promotion of BOTOX in English in the scientific and general-interest press was sufficient to establish the mark's reputation amongst both the general public and health-care professionals (paras 65 and 66).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Dokazi o promidžbi ranijeg žiga „BOTOX” na engleskom jeziku u znanstvenim i općim tiskovinama bili su dovoljni za utvrđivanje ugleda žiga u široj javnosti i među zdravstvenim djelatnicima (t. 65. i 66.).
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO The opponent's goods have been advertised and articles have been written about them in many of the world's leading fashion-related lifestyle magazines, and in some of Europe's leading mainstream periodicals.
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO Proizvodi podnositelja prigovora oglašavali su se i o njima se pisalo u mnogim vodećim svjetskim modnim časopisima, kao i u nekim vodećim europskim općim časopisima.
In line with the case-law, the reputation of KENZO for the said goods is confirmed.
U skladu sa sudskom praksom, potvrđen je ugled žiga „KENZO” za navedene proizvode.
The goods for which the earlier mark has reputation are cosmetics, perfumes and clothing.
Proizvodi za koje raniji žig ima ugled jesu kozmetički proizvodi, parfemi i odjeća.
Because of its substantial reputation, the earlier mark KENZO possesses an ‘undisputable allure' that can be transferred to nearly any luxury product (para. 33).
Zbog njegova znatnog ugleda, raniji žig „KENZO” ima „neospornu privlačnost” koja se može prenijeti na gotovo sve luksuzne proizvode (t. 33.).
A subsequent case confirmed this reputation (para. 33).
U kasnijem je predmetu taj ugled potvrđen (t. 33.).
It is apparent from Ferrero's various advertising campaigns on Italian television (including Rai) that the earlier mark was widely exposed to viewers in 2005 and 2006.
Iz različitih reklamnih kampanja Ferrera na talijanskoj televiziji (uključujući Rai) očito je da je raniji žig 2005. i 2006. bio u velikoj mjeri izložen gledateljima.
Many of these spots appear to have been broadcast at peak viewing times (e.g. during Formula 1 Grand Prix coverage) (para. 41).
Mnogi od tih reklamnih spotova prikazivali su se u vrijeme najveće gledanosti (npr. tijekom prijenosa utrka Grand Prix Formule 1) (t. 41.).
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (under appeal, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) The opponent's trade mark is not only known per se but, due to the high price of sports cars and the opponent's intensive expenditure on advertising, and against the background of its successes in racing, the public associates it with an image of luxury, high technology and high performance (para. 31).
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (pobijana presuda, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) Žig podnositelja prigovora nije samo poznat sam po sebi, već ga zbog visoke cijene sportskih automobila i znatnih troškova koje je podnositelj prigovora uložio u oglašavanje te prema njegovim uspjesima u utrkama javnost povezuje s imidžom luksuza, visoke tehnologije i visoke učinkovitosti (t. 31.).
It was therefore considered that the appellant successfully proved reputation in Poland for jewellery, but did not prove reputation for the other goods and services covered by its earlier signs.
Stoga se smatralo da je podnositelj žalbe uspješno dokazao ugled u Poljskoj u vezi s nakitom, ali nije dokazao ugled za ostale proizvode i usluge obuhvaćene njegovim ranijim znakovima.
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (confirmed 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) The Board of Appeal may take into consideration, in addition to the facts expressly put forward by the parties, facts that are well known, that is, which are likely to be known by anyone or that may be learnt from generally accessible sources.
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (potvrđeno 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) Žalbeno vijeće, osim činjenica koje su stranke izričito navele, može uzeti u obzir i činjenice koje su dobro poznate, odnosno koje su najvjerojatnije poznate svima ili koje se mogu saznati iz opće dostupnih izvora.
That exception must therefore be given a strict interpretation, defining its extent so as not to exceed what is necessary for achieving its object' (paras 29 to 32).
Uredbe o žigu EU-a] čini iznimku od načela ispitivanja činjenica koje provodi [Ured] na vlastitu inicijativu iznesenog na početku tom odredbom.
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO It is common knowledge that the earlier mark is indeed a very famous brand, not only in France, but in most European countries, in large part due to the public's exposure to products at airport and duty free boutiques as well as long-standing advertising in widely circulated magazines.
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO Opće je poznato da je raniji žig doista vrlo poznata robna marka, ne samo u Francuskoj, već i u većini europskih zemalja, a uglavnom zbog izloženosti javnosti proizvodima u zračnim lukama i bescarinskim trgovinama, kao i zbog dugogodišnjeg oglašavanja u visokotiražnim časopisima.
The weight of evidence required to support statements that are universally known to be true need not be great (para. 32).
Teret dokaza potreban kako bi se potkrijepile izjave koje su općepoznate kao istinite ne mora biti velik (t. 32.).
The documentation emanates, in the main, from the respondent directly and contains information taken from its trade catalogues, its own advertising and documents downloaded from its website.
Dokumentacija uglavnom proizlazi izravno od tuženika i sadržava informacije iz njegovih trgovačkih kataloga, reklama i dokumenata preuzetih s njegovog mrežnog mjesta.
There is insufficient documentation/information from third parties to reflect clearly and objectively what precisely the respondent's position on the market is.
Nema dovoljno dokumenata/informacija od trećih strana koje bi jasno i objektivno odražavale točan položaj tuženika na tržištu.
Reputation not proved (para. 26).
Ugled nije dokazan (t. 26.).
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, As regards documents in the case file that come from the company itself, the General Court has held that, to assess the evidential value of such a document, account should be taken first and foremost of the credibility of the account it contains.
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, Kada je riječ o dokumentaciji u spisu koji je podnijelo samo društvo, Opći sud utvrdio je da bi za procjenu dokazne vrijednosti takvog dokumenta trebalo prije svega uzeti u obzir vjerodostojnost iskaza koji sadržava.
The General Court added that it is then necessary to take account, in particular, of the person from whom the document originates, the circumstances in which it came into being, the person to whom it was addressed and whether, prima facie, the documents appear sound and reliable (para. 49).
Opći sud dodao je da je u tom slučaju potrebno posebno uzeti u obzir osobu od koje dokument potječe, okolnosti u kojima je nastao, osobu kojoj je bio namijenjen i čine li se na prvi pogled dokumenti utemeljenima i pouzdanima (t. 49.).
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. The statement submitted by an expert consultancy firm in the area of digital media strategy in the UK attests to the fact that the opponent is ‘the leading supplier of digital television in the UK' and that ‘Sky has an enormous and impressive reputation' (para. 37).
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. U izjavi koju je podnijelo stručno konzultantsko društvo iz područja strategije digitalnih medija iz Ujedinjene Kraljevine potvrđuje se da je podnositelj prigovora „vodeći dobavljač digitalne televizije u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini” te da žig „Sky” ima iznimno velik i dojmljiv ugled” (t. 37.).
17/12/2010, T192/09, Seve Trophy, EU:T:2010:553 As far as judgments of Spanish courts are concerned, the European Union trade mark system is an autonomous system, consisting of a set of rules and objectives that are specific and applied independently of any national system (para. 79).
17/12/2010, T192/09, SeveTrophy, EU:T:2010:553 Kada je riječ o presudama španjolskih sudova, sustav žigova Europske unije autonomni je sustav koji se sastoji od niza pravila i ciljeva koji su specifični te se primjenjuju neovisno o nacionalnom sustavu (t. 79.).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Decisions of the UK national office relating to the reputation of BOTOX are facts that may, if relevant, be taken into account by the General Court, despite the EUTM owners not being parties in those decisions (para. 78).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Odluke nacionalnog ureda Ujedinjene Kraljevine o ugledu žiga „BOTOX” činjenice su koje Opći sud može, ako su relevantne, uzeti u obzir iako nositelji žiga EU-a nisu stranke u tim odlukama (t. 78.).
(fig.) / FRESH & CLEAN et al. The cancellation applicant did not submit sufficient proof of the reputation of its trade marks.
(fig.) / FRESH & CLEAN et al. Podnositelj zahtjeva za brisanje nije podnio dovoljno dokaza ugleda svojih žigova.
According to the extracts from the 2001 survey conducted in Italy, although the level of ‘prompted recognition' stands at 86 %, the rate of ‘spontaneous recognition' is only 56 %.
U skladu s izvatcima iz istraživanja provedenog 2001. u Italiji, iako je razina „izazvane prepoznatljivosti” bila 86 %, stopa „spontane prepoznatljivosti” iznosila je samo 56 %.
Moreover, no indication is given of the questions put to the people surveyed, making it impossible to determine whether the questions were really open and unassisted.
Osim toga, nema pokazatelja o pitanjima postavljenima ispitanicima pa je nemoguće utvrditi jesu li pitanja zaista bila otvorena i bez pomoći.
The survey further fails to state for which goods the trade mark is known (para. 27).
U istraživanju se ne navodi ni za koje je proizvode žig poznat (t. 27.).
27/03/2014, R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) The surveys do not seem to be carried out by the well-known GfK company, as the applicant argues, but rather by a Mr Philip Malivore who, according to his own declaration, is only ‘a former director of GfK'.
27/03/2014,R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) Čini se da istraživanja ne provodi dobro poznato društvo GfK, kako tvrdi podnositelj prijave, nego g. Philip Malivore koji je, prema vlastitoj izjavi, samo „bivši direktor društva GfK”.
The Board is thus perplexed as to how a former employee of GfK can be authorised to use that company's logo on each and every page of the surveys when he is now ‘an independent market research consultant'.
Vijeće je stoga izrazilo čuđenje zbog činjenice da je bivši zaposlenik društva GfK ovlašten upotrebljavati logotip društva na svakoj stranici istraživanja dok trenutačno obavlja djelatnost „neovisnog konzultanta u istraživanju tržišta”.
These facts cast considerable doubt on the source, reliability and independent nature of the surveys (para. 49).
Tim se činjenicama dovode u pitanje izvor, pouzdanost i neovisnost istraživanja (t. 49.).
/ COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA The survey submitted by the opponent does not provide conclusive information to demonstrate that the earlier sign is well known to the Spanish public for aerated waters as the interviewees were carefully selected on the basis of their origin, that is, Colombians resident in Spain.
/ COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA Ispitivanjem koje je podnositelj prigovora podnio ne pružaju se uvjerljive informacije kojima bi se dokazalo da je raniji žig dobro poznat španjolskoj javnosti za gazirane vode jer su ispitanici pomno odabrani na temelju njihova podrijetla, odnosno odabrani su Kolumbijci koji žive u Španjolskoj.
This is only a very small part of the population living in Spain.
To je vrlo malen dio stanovništva Španjolske.
Moreover, the statements are not corroborated by conclusive data on the extent or turnover of the goods (para. 23).
01/06/2011, R 1345/20101, Fukato Fukato (fig.) / DEVICE OF A SQUARE (fig.) etal.
That opinion poll was conducted by an independent company.
To je ispitivanje javnog mnijenja provelo neovisno društvo.
In principle, samples of 1 000-2 000 interviewees are considered sufficient, provided they are representative of the type of consumer concerned.
U načelu, uzorci od 1 000 do 2 000 ispitanika smatraju se dovoljnima uz uvjet da su reprezentativni za predmetnu vrstu potrošača.
The opponent's opinion poll was based on a sample of 500 interviewees, which is not sufficient in respect of the services for which reputation is claimed.
Ispitivanje javnog mnijenja podnositelja prigovora temeljilo se na uzorku od 500 ispitanika, što nije dovoljno u odnosu na usluge za koje se zahtijeva ugled.
According to the opinion poll, the logo of the earlier mark has been associated especially with services in the financial and insurance fields.
Prema ispitivanju javnog mnijenja logotip ranijeg žiga povezivao se prije svega s uslugama u području financija i osiguranja.
Since the opposition is only based on Class 42 with regard to the earlier European Union trade mark, it does not cover financial and insurance services.
Budući da se prigovor temelji samo na razredu 42. u odnosu na raniji žig EU-a, njime nisu obuhvaćene financijske i osiguravateljske usluge.
Consequently, the opinion poll submitted is not suitable proof of the reputation of the opponent's European Union trade mark (para. 58).
Stoga podneseno ispitivanje javnog mnijenja nije prikladan dokaz ugleda žiga EU-a podnositelja prigovora (t. 58.).
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. The many brand awards won by the mark were, together with the huge investment in advertising and the number of articles published in different publications, considered an important part of the evidence for reputation (para. 9(iii) and para. 27).
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. Brojne nagrade za robnu marku koje su dodijeljene za žig, zajedno s golemim ulaganjima u oglašavanje i brojem članaka objavljenih u različitim izdanjima, smatrale su se važnim dijelom dokaza o ugledu (točka 9. podtočka iii.
Case No Comment
i točka 27.).
10/03/2011, R 555/20092, BACI MILANO (fig.) / BACI & ABBRACCI The reputation of the earlier trade mark in Italy was proven by the copious amount of documentation submitted by the opponent, which included, inter alia, an article from Economy revealing that in 2005 the ‘BACI & ABBRACCI' trade mark was one of the fifteen most counterfeited fashion brands in the world; an article published in Il Tempo on 05/08/2005, in which the ‘BACI & ABBRACCI' trade mark is mentioned alongside others, including Dolce & Gabbana, Armani, Lacoste and Puma, as being targeted by counterfeiters; an article published in Fashion on 15/06/2006, in which the trade mark is defined as ‘a true market phenomenon'; publicity campaigns from 2004 to 2007, with testimonials from entertainment and sports celebrities; and a market survey conducted by the renowned independent agency Doxa in September 2007, from which it emerges that the trade mark is ‘top of mind' in the fashion sector for 0.6 % of the Italian public (para. 35).
10/03/2011, R 555/20092, BACI MILANO (fig.) / BACI & ABBRACCI Ugled ranijeg žiga u Italiji bio je dokazan opsežnom dokumentacijom koju je podnio podnositelj prigovora, a koja je, među ostalim, sadržavala članak iz časopisa Economy koji pokazuje da je 2005. žig „BACI & ABBRACCI” bio jedna od petnaest najkrivotvorenijih modnih marki na svijetu; članak objavljen u novinama Il Tempo 5. kolovoza 2005. u kojem se žig „BACI & ABBRACCI” spominje uz druge žigove, uključujući „Dolce& Gabbana”, „Armani”, „Lacoste” i „Puma”, kao meta krivotvoritelja; članak objavljen u časopisu Fashion 15. lipnja 2006., u kojem se žig definira kao „istinski tržišni fenomen”; reklamne kampanje od 2004. do 2007. sa svjedočanstvima poznatih osoba iz svijeta zabave i sporta; istraživanje tržišta koje je provela poznata neovisna agencija Doxa u rujnu 2007. iz kojeg proizlazi da je žig „prvi na pameti” u sektoru mode za 0,6 % talijanske javnosti (t. 35.).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed by 10/05/2012, C100/11 P The inclusion of a word in a dictionary is the expression of a fair amount of recognition on the part of the public.
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potvrđeno 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Uvrštavanje riječi u rječnik izraz je velikog priznanja u određenom dijelu javnosti.
The references in the 2002 and 2003 editions of a number of dictionaries published in the United Kingdom constitute one of the items of evidence that may establish the reputation of the trade mark BOTOX in that country or amongst the English-speaking public of the European Union (paras 55 and 56).
Upućivanja u izdanjima iz 2002. i 2003. niza rječnika objavljenih u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini jedan su od dokaznih materijala kojima se može utvrditi ugled žiga „BOTOX” u toj zemlji ili u javnosti engleskog govornog područja u Europskoj uniji (t. 55. i 56.).
14/04/2011, R 1272/20101, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al. (08/07/2015, T357/11 INTP, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al., EU:T:2015:534) The evidence submitted shows a high level of recognition of the mark on the Spanish market.
14/04/2011, R 1272/20101, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al. (08/07/2015, T357/11 INTP, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al., EU:T:2015:534) Priloženi dokazi pokazuju visoku razinu prepoznatljivosti žiga na španjolskom tržištu.