natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission carried out the on-the-spot check at the consultant's premises to verify the reliability of the methodology and data supplied.
Kako bi provjerila pouzdanost metodologije i dostavljenih podataka, Komisija je izvršila provjeru prostora konzultanta na licu mjesta.
The on-the-spot check was carried out as a follow-up of the cross-checking of the data by the Commission and to obtain further assurance as regards the reliability and quality of the data and related methodology.
Provjera na licu mjesta izvršena je u cilju potpore unakrsnoj provjeri podataka koju je izvršila Komisija i kako bi se dobilo dodatno jamstvo u pogledu pouzdanosti i kvalitete podatka i povezane metodologije.
As a result, the Commission was further reassured of the reliability of the data provided by the consultant.
Tako je Komisija dobila dodatno jamstvo pouzdanosti podataka primljenih od konzultanta.
As far as the other sources used to cross check the data provided by the consultant are concerned, these were reports published by the JRC and by ‘EPIA’ on the same topics.
Kao ostali izvori za unakrsnu provjeru podataka koje je dostavio konzultant upotrijebljena su izvješća JRC-a i EPIA-e o istim temama.
As for the comparison of data with other sources it is noted that they showed not only similar trends but also similar magnitudes.
U pogledu usporedbe podataka s drugim izvorima, napominje se da su podaci pokazali ne samo slične trendove nego i slične vrijednosti.
The consultant's main activity is collecting data linked to the PV sector and developing an up-to-date database of companies active in the PV market.
Glavna djelatnost konzultanta jest prikupljanje podataka povezanih s fotonaponskim sektorom i održavanje baze podataka poduzeća aktivnih na fotonaponskom tržištu.
These data are published in specialised photovoltaic magazines and also used by individual companies for which it carries out specialised research.
Ti podaci objavljuju se u specijaliziranim časopisima o fotonaponskom sektoru, a njima se služe i pojedinačna poduzeća za koja provodi specijalizirana istraživanja.
The database developed by Europressedienst is regularly up-dated and re-published.
Baza podataka Europressediensta redovito se ažurira i nanovo objavljuje.
To this end, it collects the data via standard questionnaires sent to the companies listed in the database or via phone, especially from the Union producers, or during the specialised fairs, notably from producers in third countries.
U tom cilju konzultant podatke prikuplja s pomoću standardnih upitnika koje šalje poduzećima navedenima u bazi podataka ili s pomoću telefonskih poziva, prvenstveno podatke o proizvođačima iz Unije ili, kad je riječ o specijaliziranim sajmovima, uglavnom o proizvođačima iz trećih zemalja.
When the information cannot be obtained through the channels just mentioned, Europressedienst checks the financial reports of companies in the photovoltaic sector or co-operates on a freely basis with other research institutes with a view to obtaining or cross-checking the data.
Kad se do informacija ne može doći navedenim kanalima, Europressedienst provjerava financijske izvještaja poduzeća u fotonaponskom sektoru ili na dobrovoljnoj osnovi surađuje s ostalim istraživačkim centrima kako bi dobio podatke ili ih unakrsno provjerio.
It was verified that these sources were used by the consultant in its daily activity.
Ustanovljeno je da se konzultant tim izvorima svakodnevno služi.
In the light of the above, it was considered appropriate to make use of Europressedienst's services in the present investigation and the parties' claims in this respect were therefore rejected.
U svjetlu navedenog, smatralo se primjerenim iskoristiti usluge Europressediensta u tekućem ispitnom postupku te su tvrdnje stranke u tom smislu odbijene.
With regard to the Best Practices for the submission of economic evidence issued by the competent service of the Commission (‘the Best Practices’), the following remarks should be made.
Kad je riječ o Najboljoj praksi za podnošenje gospodarskih dokaza koju je izdala Komisija („Najbolja praksa”), treba uzeti u obzir sljedeće napomene.
First of all, it is a document that cannot engage the Commission, as it has not been adopted by the College, but published by the competent service with the purpose of providing recommendations to parties as to how to present economic evidence.
Prvo, riječ je o dokumentu koji ne obvezuje Komisiju jer ga nije donio Kolegij, nego ga je objavila nadležna služba radi davanja preporuka zainteresiranim strankama u pogledu iznošenja gospodarskih dokaza.
Secondly, the Best Practices concern the submission of economic analysis and data used in competition investigations pursuant to Article 101 and 102 TFEU and in merger cases.
Drugo, Najbolje prakse odnose se na podnošenje gospodarske analize i podataka upotrijebljenih u postupcima za utvrđivanje narušavanja tržišne utakmice, u skladu s člancima 101. i 102. UFEU-a i u slučajevima koncentracije poduzetnika.
The applicable rules, standards of proof and investigating powers of the Commission in those competition cases cannot be compared to trade defence investigations, to which an entirely different set of rules applies.
Primjenjiva pravila, standardi dokazivanja i ovlasti Komisije u ispitnom postupku za utvrđivanje narušavanja tržišne utakmice ne mogu se uspoređivati s postupcima u području zaštite trgovine na koje se primjenjuje potpuno drugačiji skup pravila.
Several parties contested the methodology used by the consultant claiming that it would not reach recognised scientific standards.
Nekoliko je stranaka osporavalo metodologiju kojom se koristio konzultant tvrdnjama da se njima ne mogu zadovoljiti priznate znanstvene norme.
However, as mentioned above in recital (481) above, the methodology was assessed and the resulting data were cross-checked and verified and as a result were considered in line with other published data and therefore reasonably reliable.
Međutim, kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi (481), izvršeno je procjenjivanje metodologije, a dobiveni podaci unakrsno su provjereni i potvrđeni te su se stoga smatrali sukladnima ostalim objavljenim podacima te time i opravdano pouzdanima.
Specific points raised by certain interested parties, were clarified bilaterally and made available in the open file of the investigation for inspection by interested parties.
Nekoliko specifičnih primjedbi koje su iznijele određene zainteresirane stranke razjašnjene su na bilateralnoj osnovi te zainteresiranim strankama radi provjere stavljene na raspolaganje u otvorenom spisu o ispitnom postupku.
This claim was rejected as the relevant information was made available to all interested parties in the file open for inspection by interested parties.
Ta je tvrdnja odbačena jer su zainteresiranim strankama radi provjere relevantne informacije stavljene na raspolaganje u otvorenom spisu.
After final disclosure, several parties reiterated their concerns on the selection of the consultant by the Commission and on the quality of the data supplied.
Nakon konačne objave nekoliko stranaka ponovilo je svoju zabrinutost u vezi s Komisijinim odabirom konzultanta i kvalitetom dostavljenih podataka.
In this respect it was claimed that the consultant's data can be ordered and purchased on an ad hoc basis to meet the specifically identified requests of potential clients and may therefore not be objective.
U tom pogledu tvrdili su da se podaci konzultanta mogu naručiti i kupiti na ad hoc osnovi kako bi se ispunili posebno utvrđeni uvjeti potencijalnih klijenata te stoga mogu biti neobjektivni.
In addition, CCCME contested that the data collected by the consultant can be considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation since the data was to a large extent based on assumptions and estimations.
Osim toga, CCCME je osporavao da se podaci koje je prikupio konzultant mogu smatrati pozitivnim dokazom u smislu članka 3. stavka 2. Osnovne uredbe jer se podaci velikim dijelom temelje na pretpostavkama i procjenama.
Furthermore, it was claimed that the data supplied were not sufficiently supported by evidence in the file and that they were not of an affirmative, objective and verifiable character.
Nadalje, tvrdilo se da dostavljeni podaci nisu dovoljno potkrijepljeni dokazima u spisu te da nisu potvrdni, objektivni i provjerljivi.
In respect of these claims, reference is made to the recitals (481) — (482) above where additional information was provided regarding the selection of the consultant.
U vezi s tim tvrdnjama upućuje se na prethodne uvodne izjave (481) i (482), u kojima se navode dodatni podaci o odabiru konzultanta.
In addition, it is noted that the Commission hired the consultant on the basis of the best available information at that moment in time and in full compliance with the Commission Financial Regulation applicable to the procedure.
Nadalje, napominje se da je Komisija konzultanta odabrala na temelju najboljih informacija dostupnih u tom trenutku i potpuno u skladu s Financijskom uredbom Komisije koja se primjenjuje na taj postupak.
Furthermore, it is recalled that the consultant's capacity to provide all the needed data in due time was of great importance since the Commission was bound to statutory deadlines for the publication of the provisional findings in the on-going investigation.
Nadalje, podsjeća se da je sposobnost konzultanta da pravodobno osigura sve potrebne podatke bila veoma važna jer je za tekući ispitni postupak Komisija dužna privremene nalaze objaviti u propisanim rokovima.
As regards the quality of the data supplied and whether it can be considered as positive evidence in accordance with Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation, as mentioned above in recital (482), the consultant's methodology for collecting the data was examined and it was assessed that it was of satisfactory quality.
U pogledu kvalitete dostavljenih podataka i dvojbe mogu li se oni smatrati pozitivnim dokazima u smislu članka 3. stavka 2. Osnovne uredbe, kao što se prethodno navodi u uvodnoj izjavi (482), ispitana je metodologija konzultanta za prikupljanje podataka i ocijenjeno je da je zadovoljavajuće kvalitete.
In addition, as also mentioned above in the same recital, the data supplied by the consultant were cross-checked when possible with other sources and found to be reasonably accurate.
Nadalje, kao što se navodi u istoj uvodnoj izjavi, podaci koje je dostavio konzultant unakrsno su provjereni s drugim izvorima kad je to bilo moguće te je utvrđeno da su u razumno točni.
Several interested parties requested further information concerning the methodology used by the consultant such as the average response rates to the questionnaires/interviews, the percentage of data collected through each channel, how these were verified, the approximations/assumptions used to generate the data, the number of companies for which approximations were made, and at least a range of the number of employees of the consultant.
Nekoliko zainteresiranih stranaka zatražilo je dodatne informacije o metodologiji kojom se konzultant služio poput prosječnog broja odgovora na upitnik/intervjue, postotka podataka prikupljenih iz svakog izvora, načina njihove provjere, približnih vrijednosti i pretpostavki rabljenih za izradu podataka, broja društava za koje su izrađene približne vrijednosti te barem okvirnog broja zaposlenika konzultanta.
In respect of these claims, it is noted that subsequently to the imposition of the provisional measures, the Commission provided interested parties with the methodology and with the sources used by the consultant in aggregating the data and addressed specific questions of the interested parties in this regard following the provisional anti-dumping disclosure.
U pogledu tih tvrdnji napominje se da je nakon uvođenja privremenih mjera Komisija zainteresiranim strankama dostavila metodologiju i izvore kojima se konzultant poslužio u agregiranju podataka te u tom pogledu nakon privremene objave o antidampinškim mjerama odgovorila na posebna pitanja zainteresiranih stranaka.
The additional requests for information of the interested parties concerned following final disclosure are considered to be covered by the information made available after the imposition of provisional duties to the extent that the confidentiality limitations allowed it.
Dodatni zahtjevi zainteresiranih stranaka za informacije o konačnoj objavi smatraju se obuhvaćenima informacijama stavljenima na raspolaganje nakon određivanja privremenih pristojbi u mjeri u kojoj to dopuštaju ograničenja povjerljivosti.
In addition, it is underlined that the Commission verified on-the-spot the way the data had been collected and aggregated by the consultant and the relevant underlying assumptions for aggregating the data.
Osim toga, naglašava se da je Komisija na licu mjesta provjerila način na koji je konzultant prikupio i agregirao podatke te osnovne pretpostavke za njihovo agregiranje.
The results of the verification were satisfactory and the Commission was reassured of the reasonableness of the underlying assumptions and of the quality of the data supplied by the consultant.
Rezultati provjere bili su zadovoljavajući te se Komisija uvjerila u utemeljenost osnovnih pretpostavki i kvalitete podataka koje je dostavio konzultant.
Furthermore, the parties did not contest the data as such.
Osim toga, stranke nisu osporile te podatke.
After final disclosure, another party requested clarifications with regard to the number of Union producers considered by the consultant in its data collection and the overlap between these and the around 215 Union producers known to the Commission.
Nakon konačne objave jedna druga stranka zatražila je objašnjenje u pogledu broja proizvođača iz Unije koje je konzultant razmatrao u prikupljanju podataka i njihova preklapanja s oko 215 proizvođača iz Unije poznatih Komisiji.
In this respect, it is clarified that the Union producers considered by the consultant are largely the same than the ones known to represent the Union industry in this investigation mentioned in recital (475) above.
U tom pogledu daje se objašnjenje da su proizvođači iz Unije koje je razmatrao konzultant uglavnom oni za koje se zna da predstavljaju industriju Unije u ispitnom postupku navedenom u uvodnoj izjavi (475).
After final disclosure, one party claimed that the Commission has conducted the injury analysis in an inconsistent manner since it was done separately for modules and cells while the injury and subsidy margin calculations had been established as a weighted average for modules and cells together.
Nakon konačne objave, jedna stranka tvrdila je da je Komisija nedosljedno provela analizu štete jer je ta analiza provedena posebno za module i ćelije, a marža štete i subvencijska marža utvrđena je kao ponderirani prosjek za module i ćelije zajedno.
In this respect, it is noted that while indicators were shown separately for each product type, the conclusions reached for each indicator refer to the product under investigation as a whole.
S tim u vezi treba napomenuti da, iako su pokazatelji navedeni zasebno za svaku vrstu proizvoda, zaključci dobiveni za svaki pokazatelj odnose se na proizvod iz ispitnog postupka u cjelini.
It is also recalled that modules and cells are one single product and therefore the subsidy margins and the injury elimination level were established on this basis.
Također je navedeno da su moduli i ćelije jedinstveni proizvod i da su stoga subvencijske marže i razina uklanjanja štete utvrđene na toj osnovi.
Therefore, the claim was rejected.
Stoga je ta tvrdnja odbačena.
Finally, another party claimed that the calculation of the values of macroeconomic indicators during the IP was wrongly based on a simple average of the years 2011 and 2012 as such methodology would not be objective and would not lead to results reflecting the reality during the IP.
Naposljetku, jedna druga stranka tvrdila je da je izračun vrijednosti makroekonomskih pokazatelja tijekom RIP-a za 2011. i 2012. pogrešno temeljen na jednostavnom prosjeku jer takva metodologija ne bi bila objektivna i ne bi tijekom RIP-a dala rezultate koji odražavaju stvarno stanje.
It is clarified that a simple average of the data was only used in case where there were similar trends in the periods concerned.
Objašnjava se da je jednostavni prosjek tih podataka rabljen samo ako su u dotičnim razdobljima zabilježena slična kretanja.
In case trends were different, the methodology was adapted accordingly by taking into consideration market reality.
Kada su kretanja bila drugačija, metodologija je bila prilagođena uzimajući u obzir tržišnu stvarnost.
The party concerned did not develop to what extend the results of the methodology used would not reflect market reality.
Dotična stranka nije obrazložila u kojoj mjeri rezultati rabljene metodologije ne bi odrazili tržišnu stvarnost.
Part of the Union industry is vertically integrated and a substantial part of the Union industry's production was destined for captive use, in particular for the production of cells.
Dio industrije Unije vertikalno je integriran, a znatan dio proizvodnje industrije Unije namijenjen je vlastitoj uporabi, posebno proizvodnji ćelija.
In order to establish whether or not the Union industry suffered material injury and to determine consumption and other economic indicators, it was examined whether and to what extent the subsequent use of the Union industry's production of the like product (‘captive’ use) had to be taken into account.
Kako bi se utvrdilo je li industrija Unije pretrpjela štetu i kako bi se utvrdila potrošnja i drugi gospodarski pokazatelji, ispitano je je li i u kojoj je mjeri trebalo uzeti u obzir naknadno korištenje proizvodnje industrije Unije u pogledu istovjetnog proizvoda („vlastita” uporaba).
In order to provide a picture as complete as possible of the situation of the Union industry, data have been analysed for the entire activity of the like product and it was subsequently determined whether the production was destined for captive use or free market.
Kako bi se dobila što potpunija slika stanja industrije Unije, analizirani su podaci za cjelokupnu aktivnost u vezi s istovjetnim proizvodom te je naknadno utvrđeno je li proizvodnja bila namijenjena za vlastitu uporabu ili za slobodno tržište.
It was found that the following economic indicators related to the Union industry should be examined by referring to the total activity (including the captive use of the industry): consumption, sales volume, production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, growth, investments, stocks, employment, productivity, cash flow, return on investment, ability to raise capital and magnitude of the amount of the countervailable subsidies.
Utvrđeno je da bi u pogledu ukupne aktivnosti (uključujući vlastito korištenje industrije) trebalo ispitati sljedeće gospodarske pokazatelje koji se odnose na industriju Unije: potrošnju, obujam prodaje, proizvodnju, proizvodni kapacitet, iskorištenost kapaciteta, rast, ulaganja, zalihe, zaposlenost, produktivnost, novčani tok, povrat ulaganja, sposobnost prikupljanja kapitala i visinu iznosa subvencija protiv kojih se mogu uvesti kompenzacijske mjere.
This is because the investigation showed that those indicators could reasonably be examined by referring to the whole activity as the production destined for captive use was equally affected by the competition of imports from the country concerned.
Razlog tomu je činjenica da je u ispitnom postupku pokazano da bi se ti pokazatelji mogli razumno ispitati u pogledu ukupne aktivnosti jer je proizvodnja namijenjena vlastitoj uporabi bila jednako pogođena konkurencijom uvoza iz dotične zemlje.
Hereinafter the captive and the free market together are referred to as ‘total market’.
Dalje u tekstu vlastito i slobodno tržište zajedno se navode kao „ukupno tržište”.
As regards profitability, the analysis focused on the free market since prices in the captive market were found not to always reflect market prices and did not have an impact on this indicator.
Kad je riječ o profitabilnosti, analiza je bila usmjerena na slobodno tržište jer je utvrđeno da cijene na vlastitom tržištu nisu uvijek odražavale tržišne cijene i nisu imale učinak na taj pokazatelj.
Several parties argued that the injury should have been assessed separately for the captive and for the free market.
Nekoliko je stranaka tvrdilo da je štetu trebalo procijeniti posebno za vlastito i za slobodno tržište.
One party argued that data relating to cells destined for captive use should have been excluded from the injury assessment on the grounds that they were not affected by the subsidised imports.
Jedna stranka tvrdila je da je podatke povezane s ćelijama namijenjene vlastitoj uporabi trebalo isključiti iz procjene štete jer na njih nije utjecao subvencionirani uvoz.
The investigation has shown that vertically integrated Union producers were forced to import subsidised products (cells) and to cease production of these products at cost above the import price, as a consequence of the price pressure exerted by the subsidised imports.
U ispitnom postupku ustanovljeno je da su vertikalno integrirani proizvođači u Uniji morali uvoziti subvencionirane proizvode (ćelije) i prestati proizvoditi te proizvode po cijeni iznad uvozne cijene zbog cjenovnog pritiska subvencioniranog uvoza.
Furthermore, the investigation also revealed that the free market and the captive market displayed the same trends in prices, which also showed that they were equally affected by the imports concerned.
Osim toga, u ispitnom je postupku ustanovljeno i da se na slobodnom i vlastitom tržištu slijede isti cjenovni trendovi, što upućuje i na to da je dotični uvoz na njih jednako utjecao.
After final disclosure, several parties reiterated that the Commission failed to provide an adequate and reasoned analysis of the captive market or why a separate analysis had not been carried out.
Nekoliko stranaka ponovilo je nakon konačne objave da Komisija nije dostavila primjerenu i razumnu analizu vlastitog tržišta ili obrazložila zašto nije provela posebnu analizu.
One party claimed that no information was provided about the significance of the Union production destined for captive use.
Jedna strankaa tvrdila je da nisu dostavljene informacije o značaju proizvodnje Unije namijenjenu vlastitom tržištu.
In addition, it was claimed that recital (106) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation concluding that prices in the captive market did not always reflect market prices, contradicted the conclusions set out in recital (503) above that the free market and captive market displayed similar trends in prices.
Osim toga, tvrdilo se da je uvodna izjava (106) Privremene antidampinške uredbe u kojoj se zaključuje da cijene na vlastitom tržištu ne odražavaju uvijek tržišne cijene proturječna zaključcima uvodne izjave (503) ove Uredbe da slobodno tržište i vlastito tržište u pogledu cijena pokazuju slična kretanja.
It is firstly noted that recital (105) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation sets out the reasons as to why it was considered appropriate to examine injury indicators (except for profitability) referring to the total activity of the Union industry including captive use.
Prvo, napominje se da se u uvodnoj izjavi (105) Privremene antidampinške uredbe iznose razlozi zašto se smatra primjerenim ispitati pokazatelje štete (osim u pogledu profitabilnosti) uz upućivanje na djelatnost industrije Unije uključujući za vlastite potrebe.
In this regard it is recalled, as set out in the same recital, that the investigation revealed that the production destined for captive use was equally affected by the competition of the imports from the PRC, which as such was not contested by the interested parties concerned.
Kako je izneseno u istoj uvodnoj izjavi, u tom pogledu podsjeća se da je u ispitnom postupku ustanovljeno da je na proizvodnju za vlastite potrebe jednako utjecala uvozna konkurencija iz NRK-a, što dotične zainteresirane strankse nisu osporavale.
Therefore, the claim that no explanations were given as to why no separate analysis took place had to be rejected.
Stoga se mora odbaciti tvrdnja da nije objašnjeno zašto nije provedena posebna analiza.