natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To be taken into account, the application to intervene must be submitted within the time-limit referred to in Article 130(1) (direct actions), or Article 190(2) (appeals) of the Rules of Procedure and meet the conditions set in Article 130(2) to (4) of those Rules.
Da bi se mogao uzeti u obzir, zahtjev za intervenciju treba podnijeti u roku iz članka 130. stavka 1. (izravne tužbe) ili članka 190. stavka 2.
If the application to intervene is granted, the intervener receives a copy of every procedural document served on the parties save, where applicable, secret or confidential items or documents, and he has one month from receipt of those documents to submit a statement in intervention.
Ako je zahtjev za intervenciju odobren, intervenijentu se dostavljaju primjerci svih postupovnih akata dostavljenih strankama, osim tajnih i povjerljivih dokaznih elemenata i dokumenata, i on za predaju intervencijskog podneska raspolaže s mjesec dana vremena od datuma primitka tih akata.
Although that statement must meet the requirements in Article 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure, its content is, however, necessarily more succinct than the written pleadings of the party supported and its length should not exceed 10 pages.
Iako taj podnesak treba biti u skladu sa zahtjevima iz članka 132. stavka 2. Poslovnika, njegov je sadržaj nužno kraći od podneska stranke koju podupire, a duljina mu ne smije prekoračivati 10 stranica.
Since the intervention is ancillary to the main proceedings, the intervener must refrain from repeating in his statement the pleas in law and arguments in the written pleadings of the party which he is supporting and must set out only additional pleas in law or arguments which bear out that party’s submissions.
S obzirom na to da je intervencija akcesorna glavnom postupku, intervenijent ne smije u svom podnesku ponavljati razloge ili argumente koji se nalaze u pismenima stranke koju podupire nego treba iznositi samo dodatne razloge i argumente koji potvrđuju tezu te stranke.
Recapitulation of the factual or legal background to the case is not necessary, except in so far as its presentation in the written pleadings of the main parties is disputed or, exceptionally, calls for further particulars.
Ponavljanje pravnog i činjeničnog okvira spora je suvišno, osim ako se ne osporava pravni i činjenični okvir iz podnesaka glavnih stranaka ili isti zahtijeva dodatna pojašnjenja.
After the statement in intervention has been lodged, the President may, if he considers this necessary, prescribe a time-limit for the submission of brief observations on that statement.
Nakon podnošenja intervencijskog podneska, predsjednik može, ako to smatra nužnim, odrediti rok za podnošenje kratkih očitovanja na taj podnesak.
The lodging of those observations, the length of which should not exceed five pages, is nevertheless optional.
Podnošenje tih očitovanja, čija duljina ne bi smjela prekoračivati 5 stranica, je fakultativno.
The purpose of such observations is merely to enable the main parties to respond to inaccurate claims or to adopt a position on new pleas in law or arguments raised by the intervener.
Cilj tih očitovanja je isključivo dopustiti glavnim strankama da reagiraju na netočne tvrdnje ili zauzmu stajalište u pogledu novih zahtjeva ili argumenata koje je istaknuo intervenijent.
Where there are no such matters, it is recommended that the parties desist from lodging those observations in order to avoid unnecessarily prolonging the written part of the procedure.
U slučaju da takvih elemenata nema, preporučljivo je ne podnositi ta očitovanja kako se ne bi nepotrebno produljivao pisani dio postupka.
In so far as it meets the conditions set out in Article 130(2) to (4) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court may also give consideration to an application to intervene made after the passing of the time-limit prescribed in Article 130(1) or 190(2) of the Rules of Procedure, provided, however, that that application reaches it before the decision to open the oral part of the procedure provided for in Article 60(4) of those Rules is adopted.
Sud također može uzeti u obzir zahtjev za intervenciju koji ispunjava uvjete iz članka 130. stavaka 2. do 4. Poslovnika, podnesen nakon isteka roka iz članka 130. stavka 1. ili članka 190. stavka 2.
In that case, the intervener will be able to submit his observations, if any, during the hearing, if it takes place.
Poslovnika, ali pod uvjetom da isti stigne prije donošenja odluke o otvaranju usmenog dijela postupka iz članka 60. stavka 4. navedenog Poslovnika.
The same is true in general in the context of an application for interim measures or where a case is to be dealt with under an expedited procedure.
U načelu isto vrijedi i u postupku povodom zahtjeva za privremenu pravnu zaštitu ili ubrzanom postupku.
If there are no special circumstances warranting the lodging of written observations, the person or entity authorised to intervene in the context of such a procedure may submit his observations only orally, if a hearing is organised.
Osim u slučaju posebnih okolnosti koje opravdavaju podnošenje pisanih očitovanja, osoba ili tijelo koje je ovlašteno intervenirati u okviru takvog postupka može svoja očitovanja iznijeti samo usmeno, ako se rasprava održi.
The above rules on intervention are, in contrast, not applicable to references for a preliminary ruling.
Navedena pravila o intervenciji ne primjenjuju se na prethodne postupke.
Due to the non-adversarial nature of that category of cases and the special function of the Court when it is called upon to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation or validity of European Union law, only the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute are authorised to submit observations, written or oral, on the questions submitted to the Court by the courts or tribunals of the Member States.
Zbog toga što ti postupci nemaju narav spora kao i zbog specifične uloge Suda gdje se od njega traži da odluči, u okviru prethodnog postupka, o tumačenju ili valjanosti prava Unije, samo su zainteresirane osobe iz članka 23. Statuta ovlaštene podnijeti svoja pisana ili usmena očitovanja o pitanjima koja su Sudu postavili sudovi država članica.
Irrespective of the foregoing matters and the prerequisites relating to the content of procedural documents resulting from the provisions of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure, the written pleadings and observations lodged before the Court must meet certain additional requirements intended to facilitate the reading and processing of those documents by the Court, in particular by electronic means.
Neovisno o prethodnim elementima i zahtjevima koji se odnose na sadržaj postupovnih akata, a koji proizlaze iz odredaba Statuta i Poslovnika, pisani podnesci i očitovanja podnesena Sudu moraju udovoljavati određenim dodatnim zahtjevima kojima je cilj olakšati Sudu čitanje i postupanje s tim aktima, osobito elektroničkim putem.
Those requirements concern the form and the presentation of procedural documents as well as their length or structure.
Ti zahtjevi tiču se kako oblika i podnošenja postupovnih akata tako i njihove strukture ili duljine.
As to the formal conditions, first of all, it is essential that the written pleadings or observations lodged by the parties are presented in a form in which they can be processed electronically by the Court and that, in particular, documents can be scanned and character recognition used.
Kad je riječ o obliku, podnesci i očitovanja stranaka moraju biti podneseni u obliku koji Sudu omogućava elektroničko postupanje s tim aktima, a osobito njihovo skeniranje i optičko prepoznavanje znakova.
To that end, the following requirements must be taken into account:
U tu svrhu treba voditi računa o sljedećim zahtjevima:
the written pleadings or observations are to be drafted on white, unlined and A4-size paper, with text on one side of the page only (recto), and not on both sides of the page (recto-verso),
podnesak ili očitovanja ispisani su na bijelom papiru, bez crta, formata A4, s tekstom na samo jednoj strani (recto), a ne na obje (recto-verso),
the text is to be in a commonly-used font (such as Times New Roman, Courier or Arial), in at least 12 point in the body of the text and at least 10 point in the footnotes, with 1,5 line spacing and horizontal and vertical margins of at least 2,5 cm (above, below, at the left and at the right of the page),
tekst mora biti u uobičajenom pismu (primjerice Times New Roman, Courrier ili Arial) i najmanje veličine 12 u tekstu i 10 u bilješkama, s razmakom između redaka od 1,5 i marginama, vodoravnim i okomitim od najmanje 2,5 cm (na vrhu, na dnu, na lijevoj i na desnoj strani stranice),
all the paragraphs of the written pleadings or observations are to be numbered consecutively,
svi odlomci podnesaka ili očitovanja moraju biti kontinuirano uzlazno numerirani,
the same is true for the pages of the written pleadings or observations, including any annexes to them and their schedule, which are to be numbered consecutively, at the top right-hand corner,
isto vrijedi za stranice podnesaka ili očitovanja, uključujući i njihove moguće dodatke i njihov popis, koji moraju biti kontinuirano uzlazno numerirani u desnom gornjem uglu stranice,
lastly, where they are not sent to the Court by electronic means, pages of written pleadings or observations are to be assembled in such a way as to be easily separable and not permanently attached by means such as glue or staples.
na kraju, kada nisu poslane Sudu elektroničkim putem, stranice podnesaka i očitovanja moraju biti povezane tako da se mogu lako razdvojiti, a nipošto sredstvima trajnog spajanja poput ljepila ili uredske spajalice.
In addition to these formal requirements, the procedural documents lodged before the Court must be drafted in a form which allows their structure and scope to be grasped from the first few pages.
Pored navedenih formalnih zahtjeva treba poštivati i onaj da postupovni akti podneseni Sudu moraju biti sastavljeni na način da je već od samog početka moguće shvatiti njihovu strukturu i sadržaj.
Besides stating, on the first page of the written pleadings or observations concerned, the title of the document, the case number (if it has already been notified by the Registry) and the parties concerned (parties to the dispute in the main proceedings, the applicant (appellant) and the defendant (respondent) or parties to the case at issue before the General Court), the written pleadings or observations lodged are to begin with a brief summary of the schema adopted by the author or by a table of contents.
Na prvoj se stranici toga podneska ili očitovanja, pored naziva akta, broja predmeta (ako ga je tajništvo već dodijelilo) i stranaka na koje se predmet odnosi (stranke glavnog postupka, tužitelj i tuženik ili stranke u predmetnom postupku pred Općim sudom) navodi kratki prikaz nacrta autora ili kazalo.
Those written pleadings or those observations must end with the forms of order sought by the author or, in preliminary ruling proceedings, by the answers which the author proposes to the questions of the referring court or tribunal.
Ti podnesci ili očitovanja moraju obavezno završavati zahtjevima njihovog autora ili, u slučaju prethodnog pitanja, odgovorima koje on daje na pitanja suda koji ih je postavio.
Although the documents which are sent to the Court are not subject, as regards their content, to any requirement other than those resulting from the Statute and the Rules of Procedure, it must nevertheless be borne in mind that such documents constitute the basis for the Court’s study of the file and that they must, as a general rule, be translated by the Court or the institution which produced them.
Iako za akte koji se podnose Sudu nisu, u pogledu njihovog sadržaja, potrebni nikakvi drugi uvjeti osim onih iz Statuta ili Poslovnika, valja ipak imati na umu da će oni Sudu biti baza za proučavanje spisa te da će ih Sud ili institucija koja ih podnosi u pravilu morati prevesti.
In the interests of the proper conduct of the procedure as in the interests of the parties themselves, the written pleadings or observations must therefore be drafted in clear, concise language, without use of technical terms specific to a national legal system.
U interesu dobrog odvijanja postupka kao i u interesu samih stranaka, podnesci ili očitovanja moraju stoga biti sastavljeni na jednostavnom i preciznom jeziku, bez utjecanja tehničkim terminima svojstvenima nacionalom pravnom sustavu.
Repetition must be avoided and short sentences must, as far as possible, be used in preference to long and complex sentences which include parenthetical and subordinate clauses.
Treba izbjegavati ponavljanje i koliko god je moguće koristiti kratke, a ne dugačke i složene rečenice popraćene umetnutim i zavisnim rečenicama.
When, in their written pleadings or observations, the parties refer to a specific text or piece of legislation, of national or European Union law, references to that text or legislation must be accurately cited, both so far as concerns the date of adoption and, where possible, the date of publication of that document and so far as concerns its temporal applicability.
Kad se stranke u svojim podnescima ili očitovanjima pozivaju na tekst ili određenu odredbu nacionalnog prava ili prava Unije, upućivanja na taj tekst ili odredbu moraju biti precizna, kako u pogledu datuma donošenja i, ako je moguće, datuma objave tog dokumenta tako i njegovog vremenskog važenja.
Likewise, when they cite an extract or a passage of a judgment or of an Opinion of an Advocate General, the parties are requested to specify both the name and number of the case concerned and the exact references of the extract or the passage at issue.
Kad se u njima navodi izvadak ili odlomak iz sudske odluke ili mišljenja nezavisnog odvjetnika, stranke se također moli da točno navedu ime i broj predmeta o kojem je riječ kao i točna upućivanja na predmetni izvadak ili odlomak.
Lastly, it must be pointed out that legal argument of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute must appear in the written pleadings or observations, and not in any attached annexes, which are not as a general rule translated.
Naposljetku, potrebno je podsjetiti da se pravna argumentacija stranaka ili zainteresiranih osoba iz članka 23. Statuta mora nalaziti u podnescima ili pisanim očitovanjima, a ne u eventualno priloženim prilozima koji se u načelu ne prevode.
Only documents mentioned in the actual body of written pleadings or observations and necessary in order to prove or illustrate its contents may be submitted as annexes.
Tim podnescima ili očitovanjima mogu se priložiti jedino dokumenti spomenuti u samom tekstu podneska ili očitovanja te oni koji su nužni za prikazivanje ili potkrjepljivanje njihova sadržaja.
Annexes are furthermore not accepted, pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Rules of Procedure, unless they are accompanied by a schedule of annexes.
U skladu s člankom 57. stavkom 4. Poslovnika, podnošenje priloga se ne prihvaća ako nije popraćeno popisom priloga.
That schedule is to indicate, for each document annexed, the number of the annex, a short description of the document and the page or paragraph of the written pleadings or observations in which the document is cited and which justifies its production.
Taj popis sadrži, za svaki priloženi dokument, broj priloga, kratak opis njegove naravi i naznaku stranice ili odlomka podneska ili očitovanja gdje se dokument navodi i koji opravdava njegovo podnošenje.
Only the documents expressly provided for by the procedural rules may be lodged at the Registry.
Samo se akti izričito predviđeni Poslovnikom mogu podnositi tajništvu.
Those documents must be lodged within the prescribed time-limits and observing the requirements set out in Article 57 of the Rules of Procedure.
Ti se akti moraju podnijeti u propisanim rokovima poštujući zahtjeve iz članka 57. Poslovnika.
Documents may be lodged electronically or by post, or delivered in person to the Court Registry or, outside the opening hours of the Registry, to the reception of the Court buildings (rue du Fort Niedergrünewald) where the janitor will acknowledge receipt of that document by recording on it the date and time of lodgement.
Oni se mogu dostavljati bilo elektroničkim putem bilo poštom, ili se predmetni akt može izravno predati tajništvu Suda ili, izvan radnog vremena tajništva, prijemnoj recepciji koja se nalazi na ulazu u zgradu Suda (rue du Fort Niedergrünewald) gdje će nadležni djelatnik potvrditi primitak tog akta naznačujući na njemu dan i sat podnošenja.
The most reliable, quickest way to lodge a procedural document is by using the e-Curia application.
Najsigurniji i najbrži način podnošenja postupovnog akta je podnošenje putem aplikacije e-Curia.
The procedure for access to the e-Curia application and its conditions of use are described in detail in the Decision of the Court of 13 September 2011 on the lodging and service of procedural documents by means of e-Curia and in the conditions of use to which that decision refers.
Načini pristupa aplikaciji e-Curia i uvjeti uporabe opisani su detaljno u odluci Suda od 13. rujna 2011. o podnošenju i dostavi postupovnih akata putem aplikacije e-Curia kao i u uvjetima korištenja na koje upućuje ta odluka.
Those documents are available on the Court’s internet site (under ‘Court of Justice — Procedure’).
Navedeni dokumenti dostupni su na internetskoj stranici Suda (u rubrikama „Sud – Postupak”).
If it is not transmitted to the Court by means of the abovementioned application, a procedural document may also be sent to the Court by post.
Ako nije upućen Sudu putem spomenute aplikacije, postupovni se akt može također poslati putem pošte.
The envelope containing that document must be addressed to the Court Registry at the following address: Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald — L-2925 Luxembourg.
Pošiljka koja sadrži taj akt mora biti naslovljena na tajništvo Suda na sljedećoj adresi: Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald – L-2925 Luxembourg.
In this connection, it is appropriate to mention that pursuant to Article 57(7) of the Rules of Procedure, only the date and time of lodgement of the original at the Registry are taken into consideration in the calculation of procedural time-limits.
Ovdje je korisno podsjetiti da se, u skladu s člankom 57. stavkom 7. Poslovnika, u pogledu postupovnih rokova u obzir uzimaju samo dan i sat podnošenja izvornika tajništvu.
To prevent any time-barring, it is therefore strongly recommended that it be sent by registered post or by express delivery, several days before the passing of the time-limit prescribed for lodgement of the document.
Kako bi se izbjegla prekluzija, preporučuje se predmetno podnošenje izvršiti preporučenom poštom ili brzom dostavom nekoliko dana prije isteka roka određenog za podnošenje akta.
At the present time, a copy of the signed original of a procedural document may also be transmitted to the Registry by fax ((+ 352 433766) or as an attachment to an electronic mail (ecj.registry@curia.europa.eu). However, a document lodged by either of these methods will be treated as complying with the relevant time-limit only if the signed original itself, together with the annexes and copies referred to in Article 57(2) of the Rules of Procedure, reaches the Registry at the latest 10 days after that electronic mail or telefax was sent. That original must therefore be sent without delay, immediately after the dispatch of the copy, without any corrections or amendments, even of a minor nature. In the event of any discrepancy between the signed original and the copy previously transmitted, only the date on which the signed original was lodged will be taken into consideration.
Danas je također moguće tajništvu uputiti presliku potpisanog postupovnog akta putem telefaksa ((+ 352) 433766) ili u prilogu elektroničke pošte (ecj.registry@curia.europa.eu). Podnošenje postupovnog akta na jedan od navedenih načina smatrat će se izvršenim u propisanom roku pod uvjetom da potpisani izvornik akta popraćen prilozima i primjercima iz članka 57. stavka 2. Poslovnika stigne u tajništvo najkasnije deset dana nakon slanja telefaksa ili elektroničke pošte. Izvornik stoga treba poslati bez odgađanja, odmah nakon slanja primjerka, ne vršeći u njemu ispravke ili izmjene, čak ni one manjeg značaja. U slučaju nepodudaranja između potpisanog izvornika i ranije upućenog primjerka, u obzir se uzima samo datum podnošenja potpisanog izvornika.
As is apparent from the fourth paragraph of Article 20 of the Statute, the oral part of the procedure essentially consists of two distinct stages: the hearing of the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute and the presentation of the Advocate General’s Opinion.
Kao što to proizlazi iz članka 20. četvrtog stavka Statuta, usmeni dio postupka u biti podrazumijeva dva različita dijela: saslušanje stranaka ili zainteresiranih osoba iz članka 23. Statuta i iznošenje mišljenja nezavisnog odvjetnika.
Under the fifth paragraph of Article 20 of the Statute, the Court may nevertheless decide, where it considers that the case raises no new point of law, that the case is to be determined without hearing the Advocate General’s Opinion.
U skladu s člankom 20. petim stavkom Statuta, Sud može uvijek kada procijeni da se u predmetu ne javlja nikakvo novo pravno pitanje odlučiti da će o predmetu odlučivati bez mišljenja nezavisnog odvjetnika.
Having regard to the importance of the written part of the procedure in cases brought before the Court and subject to the application of Article 76(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the decisive criterion for holding a hearing is not so much whether an express request has been made to that effect as the assessment made by the Court itself as to the potential contribution of that hearing to the outcome of the dispute or to determining the answers which it could provide to the questions referred by a court or tribunal of a Member State.
S obzirom na važnost pisanog dijela postupka u okviru predmeta koji su podneseni Sudu i uzimajući u obzir članak 76. stavak 3. Poslovnika, za održavanje rasprave nije toliko presudan izričit zahtjev u tom smislu već procjena samog Suda o potencijalnoj korisnosti održavanja rasprave za rješavanje spora ili utvrđivanje odgovora koje on treba dati na pitanja koja mu je postavio sud države članice.
A hearing is therefore arranged by the Court whenever it is likely to contribute to a better understanding of the case and the issues raised by it, whether or not a request to that effect has been made by the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Sud će održati raspravu uvijek kad postoji mogućnost da će ona pridonijeti boljem razumijevanju predmeta i njegovog značaja, bez obzira na to jesu li stranke ili zainteresirane osobe iz članka 23. Statuta postavile zahtjev u tom smislu.
Where those parties or interested persons consider that a hearing must be arranged in a case, the onus is on them, in any event, as soon as they have received notification of the end of the written part of the procedure, to inform the Court by letter why they wish be heard.
Ako stranke ili zainteresirane osobe procijene da bi se u nekom predmetu trebala održati rasprava, one moraju Sudu nakon obavijesti o zatvaranju pisanog dijela postupka pisano obrazložiti zašto žele biti saslušane na raspravi.
That reasoning — which is not to be confused with written pleadings or observations and should not exceed three pages — must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the documentary elements or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or disprove more fully at the hearing.
To obrazloženje – koje ne treba miješati s podnescima ili pisanim očitovanjima i koje ne smije sadržavati više od tri stranice – treba proizlaziti iz konkretne procjene korisnosti rasprave za predmetnu stranku i navoditi elemente u spisu ili argumentaciju za koju ta stranka smatra da će je biti potrebno dodatno razviti ili pobijati na toj raspravi.
It is not in itself sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring, for example, to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided by the Court.
Općenito obrazloženje koje se na primjer referira na važnost predmeta ili pitanja o kojima Sud odlučuje nije samo po sebi dovoljno.