natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When the Court decides to arrange a hearing in a particular case, it fixes the exact date and time and the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute are immediately sent a letter of notice to attend by the Registry, which also notifies them of the composition of the formation to which the Court has assigned the case, of any measures of organisation of procedure decided on by the Court and, where applicable, that there is to be no Advocate General’s Opinion.
Kada Sud odluči da se u određenom predmetu održi rasprava, on određuje točan dan i sat rasprave, a tajništvo istodobno poziva stranke i zainteresirane osobe iz članka 23. Statuta, pri čemu ih također obavještava o sastavu vijeća kojem je Sud dodijelio predmet, o mjerama upravljanja postupkom koje je Sud odredio i, ako je takav slučaj, o izostavljanju mišljenja nezavisnog odvjetnika.
In order to enable the Court to arrange that hearing in the best possible conditions, the parties or abovementioned interested persons are requested to reply to the Registry’s letter within a short period stating, in particular, whether they intend actually to attend the hearing and the name of the lawyer or agent who will represent them at it.
Kako bi se Sudu omogućilo da organizira tu raspravu u optimalnim uvjetima, stranke i zainteresirane osobe pozivaju se da odgovore na poziv tajništva u kratkom roku navodeći posebice namjeravaju li sudjelovati na raspravi te ime odvjetnika ili agenta koji će ih na njoj zastupati.
A late reply to the Registry’s letter of notice to attend is likely to jeopardise the proper organisation of the hearing, both from the point of view of the speaking time allocated by the Court to the party concerned and with regard to the constraints on the operation of the interpretation service.
Zakašnjeli odgovor na poziv tajništva može dovesti u pitanje dobru organizaciju rasprave, kako u pogledu vremena koje je sud predmetnoj stranci odobrio za izlaganje tako i u pogledu ograničenja organizacije službe za usmeno prevođenje.
On account both of the sometimes difficult traffic conditions in Luxembourg and of the security measures applicable to access to the Court buildings, it is advisable to take the steps necessary to be present in the room where the hearing will take place on the day of the hearing well before it is due to start.
Zbog katkad otežanih uvjeta u prometu u Luxembourgu, kao i zbog mjera sigurnosti koje se provode prilikom ulaska u zgrade Suda, preporučuje se na dan održavanja rasprave poduzeti nužne mjere kako bi se osigurala nazočnost u raspravnoj dvorani znatno prije vremena određenog za otvaranje rasprave.
Before the hearing begins, the members of the formation of the Court usually hold a short meeting with the representatives of the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute about the organisation of the hearing.
Uobičajeno je da prije početka rasprave članovi vijeća održe kratak sastanak u vezi s odvijanjem rasprave sa zastupnicima stranaka ili zainteresiranim osobama iz članka 23. Statuta.
At that meeting the Judge-Rapporteur and the Advocate General may invite those representatives to provide, at the hearing, further information on certain questions or to develop one or more specific aspects of the case at issue.
Tom prilikom sudac izvjestitelj i nezavisni odvjetnik mogu zamoliti zastupnike da za vrijeme rasprave daju dodatna pojašnjenja o određenim pitanjima ili prošire neki određeni aspekt predmeta o kojem je riječ.
While the procedure at a hearing before the Court may vary depending on the circumstances of each case, in general it consists of three separate parts: the oral submissions proper, questions from the members of the Court and replies.
Iako njeno odvijanje može razlikovati ovisno o okolnostima svakog pojedinog predmeta, rasprava pred Sudom obično se sastoji od tri zasebna dijela: izlaganja, pitanja članova Suda i replika.
Subject to any special circumstances, the hearing usually starts with the oral submissions of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Osim u posebnim okolnostima, rasprava uobičajeno započinje izlaganjima stranaka ili zainteresiranih osoba iz članka 23. Statuta. Prvenstveni cilj tih izlaganja je odgovoriti na moguće zahtjeve da izlaganja budu usmjerena na određena pitanja i odgovoriti na pitanja koja je Sud mogao prije rasprave uputiti strankama ili zainteresiranim osobama iz članka 23.
The aim of those submissions is, firstly, to respond to any requests to concentrate on specified issues in the submissions and to answer the questions that the Court might have put to the parties or interested persons before the hearing, under Articles 61 or 62 of the Rules of Procedure, and, if applicable, then to draw attention to the points which the person presenting oral argument considers to be particularly important for the Court’s decision, in particular, in preliminary ruling proceedings, having regard to the written observations submitted by the other participants in the proceedings.
Statuta prema člancima 61. ili 62. Poslovnika i, po potrebi, istaknuti točke koje izlagatelj smatra osobito značajnim za odluku Suda, posebno kad je riječ o prethodnim postupcima, u pogledu pisanih očitovanja drugih stranaka u postupku.
In the light of the knowledge which the Court already has of the case following the written part of the procedure, it is not necessary, at the hearing, to recall the content of the written pleadings or observations lodged or, in particular, the factual or legal background to the case.
Uzimajući u obzir da nakon pisanog dijela postupka Sud već poznaje predmet, na raspravi nije potrebno ponavljati sadržaj ranije podnesenih pisanih podnesaka i očitovanja stranaka, a osobito ne pravni i činjenični okvir predmeta.
Only the decisive points for the purposes of the Court’s decision must be brought to its attention.
Pozornost Suda treba skretati samo na točke odlučujuće za donošenje odluke.
It must none the less be stated that where, before the hearing, the Court has requested the parties or the abovementioned interested persons to concentrate in their submissions on a question or a particular aspect of the case, in general only that question or that aspect should be addressed during those submissions.
Valja međutim naglasiti da se, u slučaju kada Sud prije održavanja rasprave pozove stranke ili ranije navedene zainteresirane osobe da usmjere svoja izlaganja na određeno pitanje ili neki aspekt predmeta, tada u načelu za vrijeme tih izlaganja samo o njima i raspravlja.
As far as possible, participants in the hearing who are advocating the same line of argument or adopting the same position must also liaise before the hearing to avoid repeating arguments which have already been submitted.
Sudionici na raspravi, koji zastupaju istu tezu ili dijele isto stajalište, moraju se u najvećoj mogućoj mjeri posavjetovati prije početka rasprave kako bi se izbjeglo da ponovno iznose već izložene argumente.
The speaking time is fixed by the President of the formation of the Court, after consulting the Judge-Rapporteur and, if applicable, the Advocate General responsible for the case.
Vrijeme izlaganja određuje predsjednik sastava koji odlučuje u predmetu nakon savjetovanja sa sucem izvjestiteljem i, ovisno o slučaju, s nezavisnim odvjetnikom zaduženim za predmet.
As a general rule, the speaking time is fixed at 15 minutes, irrespective of the formation of the Court to which the case has been assigned. However, that duration may be made longer or shorter depending on the nature or the specific complexity of the case, the number and procedural status of the participants in the hearing and any measures of organisation of procedure.
Općenito je vrijeme izlaganja ograničeno na petnaest minuta, neovisno o sastavu kojem je predmet dodijeljen, međutim to se trajanje može produljiti ili skratiti ovisno o naravi ili osobitoj složenosti predmeta, broju i postupovnoj ulozi sudionika na raspravi, kao i o eventualnim mjerama organizacije postupka.
An extension of the speaking time allocated may, exceptionally, be granted by the President of the formation of the Court on the duly reasoned application of a party or one of the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Produljenje odobrenog vremena izlaganja može iznimno odobriti predsjednik sastava na uredno obrazložen zahtjev stranke ili zainteresirane osobe iz članka 23. Statuta.
To be taken into account, such an application must nevertheless be made by the party or interested person concerned in his reply to the letter of notice to attend and, in any event, reach the Court at least two weeks before the actual date of the hearing.
Kako bi se mogao uzeti u obzir, taj zahtjev stranka ili zainteresirana osoba mora uputiti u svom odgovoru na poziv za raspravu, i on mora, u svakom slučaju, stići na Sud najkasnije dva tjedna prije dana održavanja rasprave.
For reasons connected with the proper conduct of the hearing, the oral submissions of the parties or the interested persons present at the hearing must, as regards each of them, be made by a single person.
Zbog razloga povezanih s dobrim odvijanjem rasprave, izlaganje stranaka ili zainteresiranih osoba prisutnih na raspravi mora za svakog pojedinačno iznijeti jedna osoba.
In exceptional circumstances, a second person may nevertheless be authorised to present oral argument where the nature or specific complexity of the case warrants this, provided a duly reasoned application to this effect has been submitted in the reply of the party or interested person concerned to the letter of notice to attend the hearing and, in any event, at least two weeks before the actual date of the hearing.
Iznimno se može još jedna osoba ovlastiti na izlaganje kada narav ili osobita složenost predmeta to opravdavaju, ali pod uvjetom da je uredno obrazložen zahtjev stranke ili zainteresirane osobe u tom smislu bio upućen u odgovoru na poziv za raspravu i, u svakom slučaju, najkasnije dva tjedna prije dana održavanja rasprave.
If it is granted, that authorisation does not however include any extension of the speaking time, and the two persons presenting oral argument must share the speaking time allocated to the party concerned.
Međutim, ako zahtjev bude odobren, to ne znači da će se vrijeme izlaganja produljiti nego to da dva izlagatelja moraju među sobom podijeliti vrijeme izlaganja dodijeljeno predmetnoj stranci.
Without prejudice to the questions which may be asked or the clarifications which may be sought by the members of the Court during the oral submissions, the persons presenting oral argument may be requested, at the end of the oral submissions, to answer additional questions from the members of the Court.
Ne dovodeći u pitanje pitanja koja se mogu postaviti ili pojašnjenja koja mogu zatražiti članovi Suda za vrijeme rasprave, izlagatelje se može nakon izlaganja pozvati da odgovore na dodatna pitanja članova Suda.
The purpose of those questions is to supplement the members’ knowledge of the file and to allow the persons presenting oral argument to explain or elaborate on certain points on which additional information may be required following the written part of the procedure and the oral submissions.
Svrha je tih pitanja da članovima Suda omoguće šire poznavanje predmeta, a izlagateljima da pojasne ili prodube određena pitanja koja bi mogla zahtijevati dodatna pojašnjenja nakon pisanog dijela postupka i izlaganja.
After that exchange, the representatives of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Staff Regulations finally have the opportunity, if they consider it necessary, of replying briefly.
Na kraju te razmjene zastupnici stranaka ili zainteresirane osobe iz članka 23. Statuta imaju napokon mogućnost, ako to smatraju potrebnim, kratko replicirati.
Those replies, of a maximum duration of five minutes each, do not constitute a second round of oral submissions.
Te replike, koje mogu trajati najviše pet minuta svaka, ne čine drugi krug izlaganja.
They are designed only to enable the persons presenting oral argument to react succinctly to observations made or questions put during the hearing by the other participants or by the members of the Court.
Njihov jedini cilj je omogućiti izlagateljima da kratko reagiraju na očitovanja ili pitanja koja su postavili drugi sudionici ili članovi Suda za vrijeme rasprave.
If two persons have been authorised to speak for a party, only one of them is authorised to reply.
Iako su dva izlagatelja ovlaštena govoriti u ime jedne stranke, samo je jedan od njih ovlašten replicirati.
Whether in their oral submissions, their replies or their responses to questions from the Court, the persons presenting oral argument must bear in mind that very frequently the members of the formation of the Court will listen to their argument by means of simultaneous interpretation.
Bilo da je riječ o izlaganjima, replikama ili odgovorima na pitanja Suda, izlagatelji trebaju imati na umu da njihov nastup članovi sastava često prate putem simultanog prijevoda.
In the interests of the proper conduct of the hearing and in order to guarantee the quality of the interpretation provided, the representatives of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute are therefore requested, if they have a text available, however short, of notes for the oral submissions or an outline of their argument, to send it in advance to the interpretation directorate, either by fax ((+ 352 43033697), or by electronic mail (interpret@curia.europa.eu). That text or those notes for the oral submissions is intended solely for the interpreters and is neither transmitted to the members of the formation of the Court and the Advocate General responsible for the case nor included in the case file.
U interesu dobrog odvijanja rasprave i kako bi se osigurala kvaliteta usmenog prevođenja, pozivaju se zastupnici stranaka ili zainteresiranih osoba iz članka 23. Statuta, ako raspolažu makar i kratkim tekstom, bilješkama izlaganja ili planom nastupa, da ih unaprijed dostave upravi za usmeno prevođenje bilo putem telefaksa ((+ 352) 43033697) bilo elektroničkom poštom (interpret@curia.europa.eu). Taj tekst ili bilješke izlaganja namijenjeni su isključivo usmenim prevoditeljima i ne prosljeđuju se članovima sastava ni nezavisnom odvjetniku kojem je predmet dodijeljen, niti se ulažu u spis predmeta.
At the hearing itself, it is however inadvisable to read out a text.
Na samoj raspravi ipak se ne preporučuje čitati tekst.
To facilitate interpretation, it is recommended to speak freely on the basis of properly structured notes.
Kako bi se olakšalo usmeno prevođenje, preporučuje se govoriti slobodno, na temelju dobro strukturiranih bilješki.
In any event, it is essential to speak directly into the microphone, at a natural pace and not too quickly, stating in advance the outline of the argument made and using short and simple sentences as a matter of course.
U svakom slučaju, nužno je govoriti odmjereno u mikrofon, prirodnim ritmom i ne prebrzo, te unaprijed najaviti plan nastupa i sustavno birati kratke i jednostavne rečenice.
The active participation of the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute comes to an end at the end of the hearing.
Aktivno sudjelovanje stranaka ili zainteresiranih osoba iz članka 23. Statuta prestaje po okončanju rasprave.
Subject to the exceptional situation in which the oral part of the procedure is reopened, pursuant to Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure, the parties or abovementioned interested persons are no longer authorised to put forward written or oral observations, in particular in response to the Advocate General’s Opinion, once the President of the formation of the Court has declared the hearing closed.
Osim u iznimnom slučaju ponovnog otvaranja usmenog dijela postupka iz članka 83. Poslovnika, nakon što predsjednik sastava proglasi zaključenje rasprave, stranke ili ranije navedene zainteresirane osobe nisu više ovlaštene davati svoja pisana ili usmena očitovanja, osobito ne kao odgovor na mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika.
The practice directions relating to direct actions and appeals of 15 October 2004 (OJ L 361, p. 15), as amended on 27 January 2009 (OJ L 29, p. 51), are hereby revoked and replaced by these Practice Directions.
Ove praktične upute ukidaju i zamjenjuju praktične upute koje se odnose na izravne tužbe i žalbe od 15. listopada 2004. (SL L 361, str. 15.), kako su izmijenjene 27. siječnja 2009. (SL L 29, str. 51.).
These Practice Directions shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ove praktične upute objavljuju se u Službenom listu Europske unije.
They shall enter into force on the day following their publication.
One stupaju na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave.
Adopted at Luxembourg, 25 November 2013.
U Luxembourgu 25. studenoga 2013.
OJ L 265, 29.9.2012, p. 1, as amended on 18 June 2013 (OJ L 173, 26.6.2013, p. 65).
SL L 265 od 29. rujna 2012., str. 1., kako je izmijenjen 18. lipnja 2013.
On 25 September 2012, the Court of Justice, with the approval of the Council, adopted new Rules of Procedure repealing the Rules of Procedure of 19 June 1991, as last amended on 24 May 2011.
25. rujna 2012. uz odobrenje Vijeća, Sud je donio novi Poslovnik kojime je stavio izvan snage Poslovnik od 19. lipnja 1991., kako je zadnje izmijenjen 24. svibnja 2011.
The new Rules entered into force on 1 November 2012 and are intended, inter alia, to ensure that the structure and content of the Rules of Procedure of the Court are adapted to changes in its caseload and, in particular, to the increasing number of references for a preliminary ruling made by the courts and tribunals of the Member States of the European Union, while at the same time supplementing and clarifying, in several important respects, the rules applicable to the conduct of proceedings before the Court.
Stupivši na snagu 1. studenoga 2012., ovaj tekst ima ponajprije za cilj prilagoditi strukturu i sadržaj poslovnika Suda promjenama koje prate predmete o kojima isti odlučuje i osobito sve većem broju zahtjeva za prethodnu odluku koje upućuju sudovi država članica Unije, a istodobno dopunjuje i pojašnjava u više važnih aspekata pravila koja se primjenjuju tijekom postupka pred Sudom.
These are set out in Article 119 et seq. (Title IV) of the Rules of Procedure and concern both the obligation for the parties to be represented by an agent or lawyer and the formal requirements linked to the content and the submission of written pleadings.
Ona su izložena u članku 119. i dalje (glava IV.) Poslovnika i odnose se kako na obvezu zastupanja stranaka od strane agenta ili odvjetnika tako i na formalne zahtjeve povezane sa sadržajem i predajom podnesaka.
The relevant rules are in Article 167 et seq. (Title V) of the Rules of Procedure, which state both the mandatory content of the appeal and of the response and the scope of the forms of order sought.
Relevantne odredbe sadržane su u člancima 167. i dalje (glava V.), koji određuju kako potreban sadržaj žalbe i odgovora na žalbu tako i doseg njihovih zahtjeva.
That application, common to the three constituent courts of the Court of Justice of the European Union, was introduced in 2011.
Ta je aplikacija, zajednička trima sudovima koji čine Sud Europske unije, u uporabi od 2011.
It allows the lodging and service of procedural documents by exclusively electronic means, without it being necessary to provide certified copies of the document transmitted to the Court or to duplicate that transmission by sending the document by post.
Ona omogućava podnošenje i dostavu postupovnih akata isključivo elektroničkim putem bez potrebe podnošenja ovjerenih preslika akta podnesenog Sudu ili potvrđivanja tog podnošenja poštanskom pošiljkom.
A hearing will not automatically be arranged.
Održavanje rasprave nije nužno.
It is apparent, in particular, from Article 120 of the Rules of Procedure, that the application initiating proceedings must, in addition to stating the name and address of the applicant and the name of the party against whom the application is made, state accurately the subject-matter of the proceedings, the pleas in law and arguments relied upon supported, as appropriate, by any evidence produced or offered, and the form of order sought by the applicant.
Iz članka 120.
Failure to comply with those requirements renders the application inadmissible.
Poslovnika slijedi da tužba, osim imena i adrese tužitelja i naznake stranke protiv koje se podnosi mora sadržavati tužbene razloge i argumente, po potrebi potkrijepljene dokazima i dokaznim prijedlozima kao i tužbeni zahtjev.
SUPPLEMENTARY RULES OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE
DODATAK POSLOVNIKU SUDA
Chapter I — Letters rogatory (Articles 1 to 3)
Poglavlje I. – Molbe za pravnu pomoć (članci 1. do 3.)
Chapter II — Legal aid (Articles 4 and 5)
Poglavlje II. – Besplatna pravna pomoć (članci 4. i 5.)
Chapter III — Reports of perjury by a witness or expert (Articles 6 and 7)
Poglavlje III. – Prijava kršenja prisege svjedokâ i vještakâ (članci 6. i 7.)
Final provisions (Articles 8 and 9)
Završne odredbe (članci 8. i 9.)
Annex I — List referred to in Article 2(1)
Prilog I. – Popis iz članka 2. stavka 1
Annex II — List referred to in Article 4(2)
Prilog II. – Popis iz članka 4. stavka 2
Annex III — List referred to in Article 6
Prilog III.
THE COURT OF JUSTICE,
Popis iz članka 6 SUD,
Having regard to Article 207 of the Rules of Procedure [1],
uzimajući u obzir članak 207. Poslovnika [1],
Having regard to Article 46(3) of the act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded [2],
uzimajući u obzir članak 46. stavak 3. Akta o uvjetima pristupanja Republike Bugarske i Rumunjske Europskoj uniji i prilagodbi Ugovora na kojima se temelji Europska unija [2],
Having regard to Article 45 of the act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community [3],
uzimajući u obzir članak 45. Akta o uvjetima pristupanja Republike Hrvatske i prilagodbama Ugovora o Europskoj uniji, Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije i Ugovora o osnivanju Europske zajednice za atomsku energiju [3],
On 25 September 2012 the Court adopted new Rules of Procedure containing various amendments, both of substance and of form, in relation to the previous Rules, which they repealed.
Sud je 25. rujna 2012. donio novi Poslovnik koji uključuje više sadržajnih i formalnih izmjena u odnosu na prijašnji Poslovnik, koji stavlja izvan snage.
Those amendments concern, in particular, the terminology used in the new Rules of Procedure and the procedure followed when legal aid is granted.
Te se izmjene posebice odnose na terminologiju korištenu u novom Poslovniku i postupak koji se provodi u slučaju odobravanja besplatne pravne pomoći.
Those alterations must, therefore, be reflected in the wording of the Supplementary Rules.
Stoga te izmjene treba prenijeti u tekst Dodatka Poslovniku.
In consequence of several Member States’ designation of new authorities responsible for the handling of the matters referred to in Articles 2, 4 and 6 of the Supplementary Rules and of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania on 1 January 2007 and of the Republic of Croatia on 1 July 2013, it would furthermore appear necessary to bring up to date the lists in the three annexes to those Rules.
S obzirom na određivanje, od strane više država članica, novih tijela zaduženih za postupanje po pitanjima iz članaka 2., 4. i 6. Dodatka Poslovniku i na pristupanje Republike Bugarske i Rumunjske Europskoj uniji 1. siječnja 2007. i Republike Hrvatske 1. srpnja 2013., čini se potrebnim ažurirati i popise u trima prilozima tom Dodatku.
With the Council’s approval given on 17 December 2013,
Uz odobrenje Vijeća od 17. prosinca 2013.,
HAS ADOPTED THESE SUPPLEMENTARY RULES:
DONOSI OVAJ DODATAK POSLOVNIKU:
Letters rogatory
Molbe za pravnu pomoć