natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
AB Report Mexico-Rice, paras. 289 and 293. Panel Report, China-GOES, paras. 7.296 and 7.302
Izvješće ŽB-a u predmetu Meksiko – riža, stavci 289. i 293.; Izvješće Skupine u predmetu Kina – elektročelik usmjerenog zrna, stavci 7.296. i 7.302.
Regarding the claim that information was missing from the open file, the interested party did not specify to which information it was referring to.
(i.) U pogledu tvrdnje da su iz otvorenog spisa nedostajale informacije zainteresirana stranka nije navela na koju se informaciju poziva.
Its claim that the non-confidential version of an entire questionnaire response has not been made available was incorrect.
(ii.) Bila je netočna njezina tvrdnja da nije stavljena na raspolaganje verzija koja nije povjerljiva svih odgovora proizvođača iz Unije na upitnik.
In order to ensure the Union producers' right to anonymity, it was also ascertained that the non-confidential versions of the questionnaires did indeed not reveal the identity of the Union producer concerned.
Kako bi se osiguralo pravo proizvođača iz Unije na anonimnost, utvrđeno je i da verzije upitnika koje nisu povjerljive doista nisu otkrile identitet dotičnih proizvođača iz Unije.
In some cases, the non-confidential versions needed therefore to be corrected accordingly by the party submitting it before they could be made available for other interested parties.
Stoga je u nekim slučajevima bilo potrebno da stranke koje su dostavile verzije koje nisu povjerljive na odgovarajući način isprave te verzije prije njihova stavljanja na raspolaganje drugim zainteresiranim strankama.
To facilitate the cooperation of the GOC, it provided a list of banks/financial institutions which provided loans to sampled companies and asked again the GOC to forward Appendix A to these entities. No additional replies to Appendix A were submitted with the reply to the deficiency letter.
Kako bi potaknula suradnju kineske vlade, dostavila je popis banaka/financijskih institucija koje su davale zajmove društvima u uzorku i ponovno od kineske vlade zatražila da tim subjektima proslijedi Dodatak A. U odgovoru na pismo za dopunu podataka nije bilo nikakvih dodatnih odgovora na Dodatak A.
It must be noted that this Decision of State Council does not seem to aim exclusively on the promotion of the use of alternative energy sources. From its title (Decision of the State Council on Accelerating the Incubation and Development of Strategic Emerging Industries) as well as from the content (inter alia Articles 1(1),1(2),2(2)) it is clear that he aim is to support the development of selected industries (in this case strategic emerging industries).
Treba napomenuti da ne izgleda da je ta Odluka Državnog vijeća usmjerena isključivo na uporabu alternativnih izvora energije.
It reasoned that ‘part of dumping calculated based on an analogue country normal value is actually same subsidisation that has been countervailed in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation’. Neither of these claims would have any impact on the level of the resulting measures as in the present case the combined duties are limited by the injury margin.
Objasnila je da „dio dampinga izračunan na temelju normalne vrijednosti za analognu zemlju predstavlja isto subvencioniranje protiv kojeg su uvedene kompenzacijske mjere u istovremenom antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku”.Ni jedna od tih tvrdnji ne bi imala utjecaja na razinu konačnih mjera jer su u dotičnom slučaju kombinirane pristojbe ograničene maržom štete.
No such evidence has been provided. This argument was therefore rejected.
Takvi dokazi nisu dostavljeni te je argument stoga odbačen.
It is, however, recognized that this ability may exist to a lesser extent than assumed in the provisional anti-dumping Regulation. Its mitigating impact on job losses may therefore be less important than initially assumed.
Međutim, priznaje se da je ta sposobnost možda manje izražena nego što se u Privremenoj antidampinškoj uredbi pretpostavlja te će stoga možda gubitak radnih mjesta ublažiti u manjoj mjeri nego što se prvobitno pretpostavilo.
Zhenjiang Rietech New Energy Science Technology Co. Ltd 4,9 % 46,3 %
Zhenjiang Rietech New Energy Science Technology Co. Ltd.
The companies from which undertakings are accepted by the Commission and whose names are listed in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU and subject to certain conditions specified therein, will also issue an invoice for transactions which are not exempted from the anti-subsidy duties. This invoice shall be a commercial invoice containing at least the elements stipulated in Annex 4 of this Regulation.
Trgovačka društva od kojih je Komisija prihvatila preuzimanje obveza i čiji su nazivi navedeni u Prilogu Provedbenoj odluci 2013/707/EU i na koja se primjenjuju određeni uvjeti iz tog Priloga također izdaju račun za transakcije koje nisu izuzete od antisubvencijskih pristojbi.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1240/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1240/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI))
o upisu naziva u registar zaštićenih oznaka izvornosti i zaštićenih oznaka zemljopisnog podrijetla (Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (ZOZP))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
U skladu s člankom 50. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, zahtjev Ujedinjene Kraljevine za upis naziva „Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes” u registar objavljen je u Službenom listu Europske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Budući da Komisiji nije dostavljen ni jedan prigovor u smislu članka 51. Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, naziv „Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes” potrebno je upisati u registar,
OJ C 180, 26.6.2013, p. 17.
SL C 180, 26.6.2013., str. 17.
Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI)
Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (ZOZP)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1241/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (PDO)]
o upisu naziva u registar zaštićenih oznaka izvornosti i zaštićenih oznaka zemljopisnog podrijetla (Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (ZOI))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
U skladu s člankom 50. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, zahtjev Španjolske za upis naziva „Aceite Sierra del Moncayo” u registar objavljen je u Službenom listu Europske unije [2].
As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Budući da Komisiji nije dostavljen ni jedan prigovor u smislu članka 51. Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, naziv „Aceite Sierra del Moncayo” potrebno je upisati u registar,
OJ C 187, 29.6.2013, p. 19.
SL C 187, 29.6.2013., str. 19.
Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (PDO)
Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (ZOI)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1242/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1242/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Cordero Segureño (PGI)]
o upisu naziva u registar zaštićenih oznaka izvornosti i zaštićenih oznaka zemljopisnog podrijetla [Cordero Segureño (ZOZP)]
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Cordero Segureño’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
U skladu s člankom 50. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, zahtjev Španjolske za upis naziva „Cordero Segureño” u registar objavljen je u Službenom listu Europske unije [2].
As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cordero Segureño’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Budući da Komisiji nije dostavljen ni jedan prigovor u smislu članka 51. Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, naziv „Cordero Segureño” potrebno je upisati u registar,
OJ C 180, 26.6.2013, p. 21.
SL L 180, 26.6.2013., str. 21.
Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)
Proizvodi na osnovi mesa (kuhani, usoljeni, dimljeni itd.)
Cordero Segureño (PGI)
Cordero Segureño (ZOZP)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1243/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1243/2013
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Dinde de Bresse (PDO)]
o odobrenju izmjene specifikacije koja nije manja za naziv upisan u registar zaštićenih oznaka izvornosti i zaštićenih oznaka zemljopisnog podrijetla (Dinde de Bresse (ZOI))
By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Dinde de Bresse’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 [2] and amended on 14 May 2003 by Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2003 [3].
U skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 1. prvim podstavkom Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, Komisija je ispitala zahtjev Francuske za odobrenje izmjene specifikacije za zaštićenu oznaku izvornosti „Dinde de Bresse”, registriranu u skladu s Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 1107/96 [2] i izmijenjenu 14. svibnja 2003. Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 828/2003 [3].
Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation [4].
Budući da predmetna izmjena nije manja u smislu članka 53. stavka 2. Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, Komisija je u skladu s člankom 50. stavkom 2. točkom (a) te Uredbe zahtjev za izmjenu objavila u Službenom listu Europske unije [4].
OJ C 157, 6.4.2013, p. 4.
SL C 157, 6.4.2013., str. 4.
Dinde de Bresse (PDO)
Dinde de Bresse (ZOI)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1244/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1244/2013
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Ciliegia di Marostica (PGI)]
o odobrenju izmjene specifikacije koja nije manja za naziv upisan u registar zaštićenih oznaka izvornosti i zaštićenih oznaka zemljopisnog podrijetla [Ciliegia di Marostica (ZOZP)]
By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Ciliegia di Marostica’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 245/2002 [2].
U skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 1. prvim podstavkom Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, Komisija je ispitala zahtjev Italije za odobrenje izmjene specifikacije za zaštićenu oznaku zemljopisnog podrijetla „Ciliegia di Marostica”, registriranu u skladu s Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 245/2002 [2].
Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.
Budući da predmetna izmjena nije manja u smislu članka 53. stavka 2. Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012., Komisija je u skladu s člankom 50. stavkom 2. točkom (a) te Uredbe zahtjev za izmjenu objavila u Službenom listu Europske unije [3].
OJ C 153, 31.5.2013, p. 8.
SL C 153, 31.5.2013., str. 8.
Ciliegia di Marostica (PGI)
Ciliegia di Marostica (ZOZP)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1245/2013
approving minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Fourme de Montbrison (PDO))
o odobrenju manje izmjene specifikacije za naziv upisan u registar zaštićenih oznaka izvornosti i zaštićenih oznaka zemljopisnog podrijetla [Fourme de Montbrison (ZOI)]
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Fourme de Montbrison’ registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 917/2010 [2].
U skladu s člankom 53. stavkom 1. prvim podstavkom Uredbe (EU) br. 1151/2012, Komisija je ispitala zahtjev Italije za odobrenje izmjene specifikacije za zaštićenu oznaku izvornosti „Fourme de Montbrison”, registriranu u skladu s Uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 917/2010 [2].
The purpose of the application is to amend the specification by giving more detailed information on the proof of origin, the method of production, labelling, national requirements and the structures responsible for monitoring the designation.
Zahtjev se podnosi radi izmjene specifikacije kako bi sadržavala podrobnije informacije u odnosu na dokaz o podrijetlu, način proizvodnje, označivanje, nacionalne zahtjeve i podatke o tijelu zaduženom za nadzor oznaka.
The specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Fourme de Montbrison’ is hereby amended in accordance with Annex I to this Regulation.
Specifikacija za zaštićenu oznaku izvornosti „Fourme de Montbrison” mijenja se u skladu s Prilogom I. ovoj Uredbi.
OJ L 269, 13.10.2010, p. 21.
SL L 269, 13.10.2010., str. 21.
In the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Fourme de Montbrison’, the following amendments are approved:
Odobravaju se sljedeće izmjene specifikacije zaštićene oznake izvornosti „Fourme de Montbrison”:
Heading II ‘Description of the product’
Rubrika II. „Opis proizvoda”
The following organoleptic description supplements the description of the product: ‘Fourme de Montbrison has a homogeneous, slightly firm texture and melts in the mouth. It has a subtle, scented flavour and a fruity, milky taste with a hint of a blue cheese, making it rather mild. A hint of salt and a slight bitterness are accepted’. This description is useful for the organoleptic examination of the product during inspection.
Opis proizvoda upotpunjen je sljedećim organoleptičkim opisom: „Fourme de Montbrison ima homogenu, pomalo čvrstu teksturu topivu u ustima. Finog je i mirisnog okusa, mliječnog teka s voćnim notama i blago naglašenim okusom plavog sira koji mu daje određenu blagost. Smije biti blago slan i pomalo gorkast.” Taj je opis koristan pri organoleptičkom ispitivanju proizvoda u sklopu nadzora.
It is specified that ‘Cutting Fourme de Montbrison is authorised if it does not completely alter its texture. Rind must be present on portions weighing more than 50 grams’.
Navodi se: „Dopušta se rezanje sira Fourme de Montbrison ako to neće narušiti njegovu teksturu. Komadi teži od 50 grama moraju imati koru.”
Heading IV ‘Proof of origin’
Rubrika IV. „Dokaz o podrijetlu”
Sub-heading IV.1 ‘Declarative requirements’
Podrubrika IV.1. „Prijavne odredbe”
It is specified that the identification declaration ‘must be made in accordance with a model validated by the Director of the National institute for origin and quality’.
Navodi se: „Identifikacijska prijava napravljena je prema modelu koji je odobrio ravnatelj Nacionalnog zavoda za podrijetlo i kvalitetu”.
Prior declarations of having no intention to produce and of resuming production are provided for, enabling close monitoring of operators who wish to withdraw for a short period from the designation of origin.
Predviđeno je podnošenje prethodnih izjava o nepostojanju namjere proizvodnje i nastavka proizvodnje, što omogućuje precizno praćenje gospodarskih subjekata koji se žele trenutno povući iz oznake izvornosti.
The content of the declarations required regarding knowledge and monitoring of the products and the procedures for sending them are set out in detail.
Navedeni su sadržaj i načini prijenosa prijava potrebnih za upoznavanje i praćenje proizvoda.
These amendments are related to the reform of the system for inspecting designations of origin introduced by Order No 2006-1547 of 7 December 2006 on enhancing the value of agricultural, forestry, food and marine products.
Te su izmjene povezane s reformom sustava nadzora zaštićenih oznaka podrijetla koja je uvedena Zakonom br. 2006-1547 od 7. prosinca 2006. o vrednovanju poljoprivrednih, šumskih ili prehrambenih te morskih proizvoda.
Sub-heading IV.2 ‘Registers’
Podrubrika IV.2. „Registri”
Sub-heading IV.3 ‘Product monitoring’
Podrubrika IV.3. „Nadzor proizvoda”
The stage at which the organoleptic examination of the product must be carried out and the sampling method are specified.
Naveden je stadij u kojem se provodi ispitivanje organoleptičko ispitivanje proizvoda i metoda uzimanja uzorka.
Heading V ‘Method of production’
Rubrika V. „Način proizvodnje”
Sub-heading V.1 ‘Milk production’
Podrubrika V.1. „Proizvodnja mlijeka”
The dairy herd is defined as ‘all the dairy cows and replacement heifers present on the holding’, it being understood that ‘the dairy cows are the animals in production and the animals which have run dry’ and ‘the heifers are the animals which have been weaned but have not yet given birth.’.
Definirano je mliječno stado.
The purpose of this definition is to avoid any confusion by making clear which animals are being referred to when the terms ‘dairy herd’, ‘dairy cows’ and ‘heifers’ are used subsequently in the specification.
Radi se o „svim mliječnim kravama i junicama koje se nalaze na gospodarstvu”, s time da su „mliječne krave životinje koje daju mlijeko i zasušene životinje”, a „junice su životinje u razdoblju nakon odbijanja od mlijeka do prvog teljenja. Tom se definicijom nastoji jasno utvrditi na koje se životinje misli pri uporabi pojmova „mliječno stado”, „mliječne krave” i „junice” u nastavku specifikacije, kako bi se izbjegle zabune.
In point V.1.a, the procedures for temporary derogation from the requirements governing the provenance of the basic ration for dairy cows in the event of drought, climatic hazards or other exceptional circumstances have been removed.
Iz točke V.1.a uklonjeni su načini privremenog odstupanja od osnovnih obroka za mliječne krave u razdobljima suše, klimatskih nepogoda ili drugih izvanrednih situacija.
In point V.1.a it is made clear that the second paragraph concerns the basic ration and that cruciferous plants in the form of fodder are excluded.
U točki V.1.a se navodi da se drugi stavak odnosi na osnovni obrok te da su biljke krstašice isključene iz krmiva.
The purpose of these clarifications is to avoid any ambiguity in the text.
Tim se podrobnim uputama nastoje izbjeći sve dvosmislenosti u tekstu.
In point V.1.a, the sentence ‘The proportion of hay, grass, wilted grass, wrapped grass or grass silage, expressed as dry matter, must be greater than or equal to 80 % of the fodder in the dairy cows’ basic ration on average for all the dairy cows over the year’ replaces the sentence ‘Hay, grass, wilted grass or grass silage must form the basis of the feed’.
U točki V.1.a rečenica „Udio svježe trave, suhog ili prosušenog sijena, trave u balama ili silirane trave u suhoj tvari mora biti veći ili jednak 80 % osnovnog obroka krmiva za mliječne krave što je godišnji prosjek za sve mliječne krave zajedno” zamjenjuje rečenicu „Svježa trava, suho ili prosušeno sijeno ili silirana trava mora biti osnova prehrane”.
The proportion of grass in the basic ration is therefore clearly specified, as well as the animals to which it applies and the timescale concerned, which will facilitate checks.
Time se jasno određuje udio trave u osnovnom obroku, životinje na koje se to odnosi i vremenski razmak u kojem se daje, što će olakšati nadzor.
This provision emphasises the importance of grass-based feed for the designation of origin ‘Fourme de Montbrison’.
Tom se odredbom ističe važnost ishrane temeljene na travi za oznaku izvornosti „Fourme de Montbrison”.
In point V.1.a, the sentence ‘The proportion of maize silage, expressed as dry matter, must not exceed 20 % of the dairy cows’ basic ration on average for all the dairy cows over the year’ replaces the sentence ‘The proportion of maize silage, expressed as dry matter, must not exceed 20 % of the daily ration on average for the herd over the year’.
U točki V.1.a rečenica „Udio silažnog kukuruza u suhoj tvari ne smije biti veći od 20 % osnovnog obroka mliječnih krava, što je godišnji prosjek za sve mliječne krave zajedno” zamjenjuje rečenicu „Udio silažnog kukuruza u suhoj tvari ne smije prijeći 20 % dnevnog obroka, što je godišnji prosjek za stado”.
The restriction on the quantity of maize therefore applies to the basic ration and not the whole ration and takes into account only the dairy cows.
Dakle, ograničavanje količine kukuruza primjenjuje se na osnovni obrok, a ne na ukupni obrok i odnosi se samo na mliječne krave.
This provision is supplemented by the sentences ‘Within the dairy herd, the consumption of whole-crop maize silage is reserved for the heifers entering their last month of gestation and for the dairy cows’ and ‘The cumulation, in the dairy cows’ daily ration, of (fresh or ensilaged) whole-crop maize with grain or ear maize preserved by moisture is prohibited’.
Ta je odredba nadopunjena rečenicama „Unutar stada mliječnih krava potrošnja silažne cijele biljke kukuruza rezervirana je za junice koje ulaze u zadnji mjesec spolnog sazrijevanja i na mliječne krave” i „U dnevnom obroku mliječnih krava zabranjeno je istodobno stavljanje cijelih biljki kukuruza (svježeg ili silažnog) zajedno s kukuruzom u zrnu ili u klasu konzerviranim na vlažni način”.
Specifying the animals which may receive maize silage facilitates checking the proportion of maize silage actually given to the dairy cows.
Preciznim određivanjem životinja koje smiju dobiti silažni kukuruz olakšava se nadzor stvarno danog udjela silažnog kukuruza mliječnim kravama.
The purpose of the ban on cumulation of whole-crop maize with grain or ear maize preserved by moisture is likewise to limit the proportion of maize in the dairy cows’ feed, particularly in fermented form.
Zabrana davanja cijele biljke kukuruza zajedno s kukuruzom u zrnu ili vlažno konzerviranim klasom također ima za cilj ograničiti udio kukuruza, poglavito u fermentiranom obliku, u prehrani muzenih krava.
The purpose of all these provisions is, firstly, to give preference to grass in the dairy cows’ feed and, secondly, to facilitate checks by providing more precise references to the animals and periods concerned.
Svrha svih tih odredaba jest s jedne strane dati prednost travi u prehrani muzenih krava, a s druge strane olakšati nadzor davanjem preciznijih uputa vezanih uz životinje i razdoblja prehrane.
In point V.1.a the provision relating to the supply of hay outside the grazing period applies only to the dairy cows: in the interests of consistency, monitoring compliance with this provision is therefore carried out on all the dairy cows and not on the dairy herd.
U točki V.1.a odredba o udjelu sijena izvan razdoblja ispaše odnosi se na muzne krave: u svrhu postizanja koherentnosti, nadzor provedbe te odredbe obavlja se nad svim mliječnim kravama zajedno, a ne samo nad mliječnim stadom.
In point V.1.b, in the interests of greater clarity, it is specified that the ban on rearing only by permanent stalling and on off-land rearing applies to the dairy cows.
U točki V.1.b radi veće preciznosti naznačuje se da se zabrana uzgoja krava isključivo u stajama i uzgoja bez ispaše odnosi samo na mliječne krave.
In point V.1.b a minimum grazing period of 150 days a year is stipulated for the dairy cows.
U točki V.1.b navodi se minimalno trajanje ispaše od 150 dana godišnje za mliječne krave.