natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 of 2 April 2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], the Commission recognises the equivalence of aviation security standards of third countries under the condition that the criteria set out in that Regulation are met.
U skladu s Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 272/2009 od 2. travnja 2009. o dopunjavanju zajedničkih osnovnih standarda zaštite civilnog zračnog prometa utvrđenih u Prilogu Uredbi (EZ) br. 300/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća [2], Komisija priznaje istovrijednost standarda zaštite zračnog prometa trećih zemalja uz uvjet da su ispunjeni kriteriji iz navedene Uredbe.
The Commission has verified that Vagar airport in Faroe Islands and Kangerlussuaq airport in Greenland fulfil the criteria set out in Part E of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 272/2009.
Komisija je utvrdila da zračna luka Vagar na Farskim otocima i zračna luka Kangerlussuaq na Grenlandu ispunjavaju kriterije iz Dijela E Priloga Uredbi (EZ) br. 272/2009.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 [3], lists in its Annex the third countries recognised as applying security standards equivalent to the common basic standards that Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 establishes.
U prilogu Uredbi Komisije (EU) br. 185/2010 [3] navedene su treće zemlje za koje se priznaje da primjenjuju standarde zaštite jednakovrijedne zajedničkim osnovnim standardima utvrđenima Uredbom (EZ) br. 272/2009.
Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredba Komisije (EU) br. 185/2010 trebala bi se stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
OJ L 91, 3.4.2009, p. 7.
SL L 91, 3.4.2009., str. 7.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 of 4 March 2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (OJ L 55, 5.3.2010, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) br. 185/2010 od 4. ožujka 2010. o utvrđivanju detaljnih mjera za provedbu zajedničkih osnovnih standarda o zaštiti zračnog prometa, SL L 55, 5.3.2010., str. 1.
in Chapter 3, Attachment 3-B, the following entries are added:
U glavi 3., Prilogu 3-B, dodaju se sljedeći unosi:
‘Vagar airport in Faroe Islands
„Zračna ruka Vagar na Farskim otocima
Kangerlussuaq airport in Greenland’
Zračna luka Kangerlussuaq na Grenlandu”
in Chapter 4, Attachment 4-B, the following entries are added:
U glavi 4., Prilogu 4-B, dodaju se sljedeći unosi:
in Chapter 5, Attachment 5-A, the following entries are added:
U glavi 5., Prilogu 5-A, dodaju se sljedeći unosi:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1104/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1104/2013
entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Basterdsuiker’/‘Basterdsuicker’/‘Basterdsuijcker’/‘Basterdsuijker’/‘Basterd’/‘Bastardsuiker’/‘Bastardsuicker’/‘Bastardsuijcker’/‘Bastardsuijker’/‘Bastard’/‘Bastert’/‘Bastertsuiker’ (TSG))
o upisu naziva u registar garantirano tradicionalnih specijaliteta [„Basterdsuiker”/„Basterdsuicker”/„Basterdsuijcker”/„Basterdsuijker”/„Basterd”/„Bastardsuiker”/„Bastardsuicker”/„Bastardsuijcker”/„Bastardsuijker”/„Bastard”/„Bastert”/„Bastertsuiker” (GTS)]
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (UE) br. 1151/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. studenoga 2012. o sustavima kvalitete za poljoprivredne i prehrambene proizvode [1], a posebno njezin članak 52. stavak 2.,
Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, the Netherlands’ application to register the name ‘Basterdsuiker’/‘Basterdsuicker’/‘Basterdsuijcker’/‘Basterdsuijker’/‘Basterd’/‘Bastardsuiker’/‘Bastardsuicker’/‘Bastardsuijcker’/‘Bastardsuijker’/‘Bastard’/‘Bastert’/‘Bastertsuiker’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
U skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EZ) br. 509/2006, zahtjev Nizozemske za upis naziva „Basterdsuiker”/„Basterdsuicker”/„Basterdsuijcker”/„Basterdsuijker”/„Basterd”/„Bastardsuiker”/„Bastardsuicker”/„Bastardsuijcker”/„Bastardsuijker”/„Bastard”/„Bastert”/„Bastertsuiker” objavljen je u Službenom listu Europske unije [3].
As no statement of objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Basterdsuiker’/‘Basterdsuicker’/‘Basterdsuijcker’/‘Basterdsuijker’/‘Basterd’/‘Bastardsuiker’/‘Bastardsuicker’/‘Bastardsuijcker’/‘Bastardsuijker’/‘Bastard’/‘Bastert’/‘Bastertsuiker’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Kako Komisija nije primila nijedan prigovor u smislu članka 9. Uredbe (EZ) br. 509/2006, naziv „Basterdsuiker”/„Basterdsuicker”/„Basterdsuijcker”/„Basterdsuijker”/„Basterd”/„Bastardsuiker”/„Bastardsuicker”/„Bastardsuijcker”/„Bastardsuijker”/„Bastard”/„Bastert”/„Bastertsuiker” potrebno je upisati u registar,
OJ C 363, 23.11.2012, p. 8.
SL C 363, 23.11.2012., str. 8.
Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex I, point II, to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:
Poljoprivredni i prehrambeni proizvodi navedeni u Prilogu I. točki II. Uredbi (UE) br. 1151/2012:
Basterdsuiker/Basterdsuicker/Basterdsuijcker/Basterdsuijker/Basterd/Bastardsuiker/Bastardsuicker/Bastardsuijcker/Bastardsuijker/Bastard/Bastert/Bastertsuiker (TSG)
Basterdsuiker/Basterdsuicker/Basterdsuijcker/Basterdsuijker/Basterd/Bastardsuiker/Bastardsuicker/Bastardsuijcker/Bastardsuijker/Bastard/Bastert/Bastertsuiker (GTS)
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013.
Uredba (UE) br. 1151/2012 stupila je na snagu 3. siječnja 2013.
It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed [2].
Njome je stavljena izvan snage i zamijenjena Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 509/2006 od 20. ožujka 2006. o poljoprivrednim i prehrambenim proizvodima kao garantirano tradicionalnim specijalitetima [2].
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2013
Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1105/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013
Provedbena uredba Vijeća (EU) br. 1106/2013
of 5 November 2013
od 5. studenoga 2013.
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India
o uvođenju konačne antidampinške pristojbe i konačnoj naplati privremene pristojbe uvedene na uvoz određenih žica od nehrđajućeg čelika podrijetlom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘the basic Regulation’) [1], and in particular Article 9 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća (EZ) br. 1225/2009 od 30. studenoga 2009. o zaštiti od dampinškog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske zajednice („Osnovna uredba”) [1], a posebno njezin članak 9.,
Provisional Measures
Privremene mjere
On 3 May 2013, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed, by means of Regulation (EU) No 418/2013 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’), a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the European Union (‘the Union’) of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (‘the country concerned’).
Dana 3. svibnja 2013. Europska komisija („Komisija”) je Uredbom (EU) br. 418/2013 [2] („Privremena uredba”) uvela privremenu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz u Europsku uniju („Unija”) određenih žica od nehrđajućeg čelika podrijetlom iz Indije („dotična zemlja”).
The investigation was initiated following a complaint lodged on 28 June 2012 by the European Confederation of Iron and Steel Industries (Eurofer) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of Union producers representing more than 50 % of the total Union production of certain stainless steel wires.
Ispitni je postupak pokrenut nakon pritužbe koju je 28. lipnja 2012. podnijela Europska federacija proizvođača željeza i čelika (Eurofer) („podnositelj pritužbe”) u ime proizvođača Unije koji predstavljaju više od 50 % ukupne proizvodnje određenih žica od nehrđajućeg čelika u Uniji.
In the parallel anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission imposed a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in the country concerned by means of Regulation (EU) No 419/2013 [3] and a definitive countervailing duty by means of Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 [4].
U usporednom antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku, Komisija je Uredbom (EU) br. 419/2013 [3] uvela privremenu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na uvoz određenih žica od nehrđajućeg čelika podrijetlom iz dotične zemlje, a Uredbom (EU) br. 861/2013 [4] konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu.
At the provisional stage of the investigation, sampling was applied for the Indian exporting producers and the Union producers.
U privremenoj fazi ispitnog postupka uzorkovanje je primijenjeno na indijske proizvođače izvoznike i na proizvođače Unije.
At the provisional stage, sampling was envisaged also regarding unrelated importers.
U privremenoj fazi ispitnog postupka, uzorkovanje je predviđeno i za nepovezane uvoznike.
However, as two out of three importers chosen for the sample did not submit questionnaire replies, sampling for importers could not be applied.
Međutim, s obzirom na to da dva od tri uvoznika odabrana za uzorak nisu odgovorila na upitnik, uzorkovanje uvoznika nije bilo moguće nastaviti.
Therefore, all available information pertaining to all cooperating importers was used to reach definitive findings; in particular as far the Union interest is concerned.
Stoga su za utvrđivanje konačnih nalaza korišteni svi dostupni podaci o svim uvoznicima koji surađuju, a posebno oni koji se odnose na interes Unije.
One exporting producer alleged that since no sales from non-complainants were used for the determination of the injury suffered by the Union industry, the selected sample of Union producers could not be considered representative.
Jedan proizvođač izvoznik navodi da se izabrani uzorak proizvođača Unije ne može smatrati vjerodostojnim jer pri utvrđivanju štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije nisu korišteni podaci o prodaji proizvođača koji nisu podnijeli pritužbu.
That claim was rejected because the sample was selected on the basis of the replies received from all cooperating Union producers regardless their support for the complaint at the stage of determination of standing, and was made on the basis of production volumes.
Ta tvrdnja je odbačena jer je uzorak odabran na temelju odgovora primljenih od svih proizvođača Unije koji su surađivali neovisno o njihovom podržavanju pritužbe u fazi utvrđivanja stanja i određen je na temelju obujma proizvodnje.
One exporting producer, related to a Union producer, opposed the complaint, and requested individual examination, because it was not included in the sample of exporting producers, as a result of its low export volumes.
Jedan proizvođač izvoznik povezan s proizvođačem Unije usprotivio se pritužbi i zatražio individualno ispitivanje zato što nije bio uključen u uzorak proizvođača izvoznika zbog svojeg malog obujma izvoza.
The Union producer itself was also not included in the Union industry sample because of its low production volumes.
Proizvođač Unije nije bio uključen ni u uzorak industrije Unije zbog svojeg malog obujma proizvodnje.
The individual examination was granted by the Commission, but the exporting producer withdrew its request.
Komisija je odobrila individualno ispitivanje, ali je proizvođač izvoznik povukao svoj zahtjev.
Two of them replied to the questionnaires and five did not.
Dvoje ih je odgovorilo na upitnike, a petero nije.
Out of the two which replied to the questionnaire, one withdrew its individual examination request.
Od njih dvoje koji su odgovorili na upitnik, jedan je povukao svoj zahtjev za individualno ispitivanje.
As a result, the Commission has examined the request of one Indian exporting producer outside the sample, namely:
Komisija je stoga ispitala zahtjev jednog indijskog proizvođača izvoznika izvan uzorka, i to:
The Commission decided to extend the sample with three companies, based on their export volumes and their willingness to cooperate, as expressed following the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je odlučila proširiti uzorkovanje na tri trgovačka društva na temelju obujma njihovog izvoza i njihove volje za suradnjom koja je izražena nakon početka postupka.
As a result, the Commission has examined the questionnaire replies and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following Indian exporting producers:
Stoga je Komisija ispitala odgovore iz upitnika i obavila posjete radi provjere u poslovnim prostorijama sljedećih indijskih proizvođača izvoznika:
Garg Inox, Bahadurgarh, Haryana
Garg Inox, Bahadurgarh, Haryana,
Macro Bars and Wires, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Macro Bars and Wires, Mumbai, Maharashtra,
Apart from the above, recitals 4 to 7 and 14 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Osim prethodno navedenog, potvrđuju se uvodne izjave 4. do 7. i 14. Privremene uredbe.
As set out in recital 20 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 20. Privremene uredbe, ispitnim postupkom povezanim s dampingom i štetom bilo je obuhvaćeno razdoblje od 1. travnja 2011. do 31. ožujka 2012. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka” ili „RIP”).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 March 2012 (‘period considered’).
Ispitivanjem kretanja bitnih za procjenu štete bilo je obuhvaćeno razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2009. do 31. ožujka 2012. („razmatrano razdoblje”).
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures (‘provisional disclosure’), several interested parties, namely the 3 sampled exporting producers, the one exporting producer which withdrew its individual examination request, the complainant, and 11 users submitted comments.
Nakon objave bitnih činjenica i razmatranja na temelju kojih je odlučeno uvesti privremene antidampinške mjere („privremena objava”), nekoliko zainteresiranih strana, odnosno tri uzorkovana proizvođača izvoznika, jedan proizvođač izvoznik koji je povukao svoj zahtjev za individualno ispitivanje, podnositelj pritužbe i jedanaest korisnika podnijelo je svoje primjedbe.
The parties who so requested were granted a hearing.
Saslušanje je odobreno strankama koje su ga zatražile.
The Commission continued to seek information which it deemed necessary for the definitive findings.
Komisija je nastavila prikupljati podatke koje je smatrala potrebnima za svoje konačne nalaze.
All comments received were considered and taken into account, where appropriate.
Sve zaprimljene primjedbe propisno su razmotrene te prema potrebi uzete u obzir.
The Commission informed the interested parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in the country concerned and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (‘final disclosure’).
Komisija je obavijestila sve zainteresirane strane o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih je namjeravala preporučiti uvođenje konačne antidampinške pristojbe na uvoz određenih žica od nehrđajućeg čelika podrijetlom iz dotične zemlje i konačne naplate iznosa osiguranih privremenom pristojbom („konačna objava”).
The parties were also granted a period within which they could comment on the final disclosure.
Uz to, svim je strankama odobreno razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle podnijeti primjedbe na konačnu objavu.
Following the comments received on the final disclosure, the Commission informed the interested parties of changes in the findings concerning the level of dumping of certain exporting producers.
Nakon što je primila primjedbe na konačnu objavu, Komisija je obavijestila zainteresirane strane o izmjenama nalaza povezanih s razinom dampinga određenih proizvođača izvoznika.
The parties were again granted a period within which they could comment on the additional disclosure.
Strankama je opet odobreno razdoblje u kojem su mogle podnositi primjedbe na dodatnu objavu.
One interested party, the complainant, criticised the fact that the findings concerning the level of dumping of certain exporting producers were altered on the basis of new data and comments received after the provisional disclosure and at the definitive stage of the investigation.
Jedna zainteresirana strana, podnositelj pritužbe, požalio se na činjenicu da su nalazi povezani s razinom dampinga određenih proizvođača izvoznika izmijenjeni na temelju novih podataka i primjedbi zaprimljenih nakon privremene objave i u konačnoj fazi ispitnog postupka.
It also alleged that its procedural rights were infringed.
Također je navodio da su prekršena njegova postupovna prava.
The Commission, however, considered that it was to take into account the submissions received from the interested parties and, if necessary, alter the findings when the comments were justified.
Komisija međutim smatra da je morala uzeti u obzir ono što su zainteresirane strane podnijele i prema potrebi izmijeniti nalaze kada su primjedbe bile opravdane.
In none of these instances, new unverified data was used for the dumping determination.
Ni u jednom od navedenih primjera nisu korišteni novi neprovjereni podaci za utvrđivanje dampinga.
Moreover, the procedural rights of all interested parties were respected as they were duly and timely informed and given the same deadlines within which to submit comments.
Nadalje, poštovana su postupovna prava svih zainteresiranih strana jer su sve zainteresirane strane dužno i pravovremeno obaviještene te im je dodijeljen isti rok za podnošenje primjedbi.
As stated in recital 21 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is defined as stainless steel wires containing by weight:
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 21. Privremene uredbe, dotični proizvod definiran je kao žice od nehrđajućeg čelika:
2,5 % or more of nickel, other than wire containing by weight 28 % or more but not more than 31 % of nickel and 20 % or more but not more than 22 % of chromium,
s masenim udjelom nikla od 2,5 % ili više, osim žice s masenim udjelom od 28 % ili više, ali ne više od 31 % nikla te 20 % ili više, ali ne više od 22 % masenog udjela kroma,
less than 2,5 % of nickel, other than wire containing by weight 13 % or more but not more than 25 % of chromium and 3,5 % or more but not more than 6 % of aluminium,
s manje od 2,5 % masenog udjela nikla, osim žice s masenim udjelom od 13 % ili više, ali ne više od 25 % kroma i 3,5 % ili više, ali ne više od 6 % masenog udjela aluminija,
currently falling within CN codes 72230019 and 72230099, originating in the country concerned.
trenutačno obuhvaćene oznakama KN 72230019 i 72230099, podrijetlom iz dotične zemlje.
Some users expressed concerns about the apparent lack of distinction between the various types of the product concerned and the like product because a wide product mix exists among all the product types.
Pojedini su korisnici izrazili zabrinutost zbog očitog nedostatka razlikovanja različitih vrsta dotičnog proizvoda i istovjetnog proizvoda jer u svim vrstama proizvoda postoji široki raspon proizvoda.
As is the case in most investigations, the definition of the product concerned covers a wide variety of product types which share the same or similar basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics.
Kao što je to slučaj u većini ispitnih postupaka, definicijom dotičnog proizvoda obuhvaćen je čitav niz različitih vrsta proizvoda s jednakim ili sličnim osnovnim fizičkim, tehničkim i kemijskim obilježjima.
The fact that these characteristics can vary from product type to product type may indeed lead to cover a wide range of types.
Činjenica da se ta obilježja mogu razlikovati od jedne vrste proizvoda do druge mogla bi uistinu dovesti do obuhvaćanja širokog raspona vrsta.
The number depended on the main characteristics of the product — in this case: the steel grade, the tensile strength, the coating, the surface, diameter, and shape.
Broj je ovisio o glavnim obilježjima proizvoda, u ovom slučaju o vrsti čelika, vlačnoj čvrstoći, premazu, površini, promjeru i obliku.
All these types fell within the definition of the product concerned and the like product in the notice of initiation [5] and in the provisional Regulation.
Sve te vrste obuhvaćene su definicijom dotičnog proizvoda i istovjetnog proizvoda u obavijesti o pokretanju postupka [5] i u Privremenoj uredbi.
One party reiterated its claim that the so-called ‘highly technical’ product types are different and not interchangeable with other types of the product concerned.
Jedna je stranka ponovila svoju tvrdnju da su takozvane „visokotehnološke” vrste proizvoda drukčije i da se ne mogu zamijeniti s ostalim vrstama dotičnog proizvoda.
Hence, they should be excluded from the product definition.
Stoga ih je potrebno isključiti iz definicije proizvoda.
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union [6], when determining whether products are alike so that they form part of the same product, an assessment as to whether they share the same technical and physical characteristics, and have the same basic end-uses and the same price-quality ratio, has to be carried out.
U skladu sa sudskom praksom Suda Europske unije [6], kako bi se utvrdilo je li riječ o sličnim ili jednakim proizvodima, potrebno je izvršiti procjenu imaju li jednaka tehnička i fizička obilježja, jednake osnovne krajnje namjene i jednak omjer cijene i kvalitete.
In that regard, the interchangeability of, and competition between, those products should also be assessed.
U tom pogledu potrebno je procijeniti i zamjenjivost i međusobnu konkurentnost tih proizvoda.
The investigation found that the ‘highly technical’ product types referred to by the party have the basic physical, chemical, and technical characteristics as the other products subject to the investigation.
Ispitnim je postupkom utvrđeno da „visokotehnološke” vrste proizvoda koje je stranka navela imaju osnovna fizička, kemijska i tehnička obilježja kao ostali proizvodi koji su predmet ispitnog postupka.
They are made from stainless steel and they are wires, and the production process is similar, using similar machines, such that producers can switch between different variants of the product according to demand.
Riječ je o žicama koje se proizvode od nehrđajućeg čelika. Proizvodni postupak je sličan, uz korištenje sličnih strojeva, tako da proizvođači ovisno o potražnji mogu prijeći s jedne vrste proizvoda na drugu.
Therefore, although different types of wires are not directly interchangeable and do not directly compete, producers are competing for contracts covering a broad range of stainless steel wires.
Stoga, iako različite vrste žica nisu izravno zamjenjive niti su izravni konkurenti, proizvođači se natječu za ugovore kojima je obuhvaćen široki raspon žica od nehrđajućeg čelika.
Moreover, these product types are produced and sold by both the Union industry and the Indian exporting producers using a similar production method.
Štoviše, te vrste proizvoda proizvode te prodaju i industrija Unije i indijski proizvođači izvoznici pri čemu koriste sličnu metodu proizvodnje.
Therefore, the claim cannot be accepted.
Tvrdnja se, stoga, ne može prihvatiti.
In response to final disclosure, one party claimed that the analysis carried out by the Commission in terms of establishing whether the so-called highly technical product types should be included in the investigation was insufficient.
U odgovoru na konačnu objavu jedna je stranka navela da analiza koju je provela Komisija nije bila dostatna kako bi se utvrdilo je li potrebno vrste takozvanih visokotehnoloških proizvoda uključiti u ispitni postupak.