natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit, EU:C:2006:310 Evidence of the sale to a single customer in Spain of concentrated fruit juices during a period of 11.5 months, with a total volume of sales of EUR 4 800, corresponding to the sale of 293 cases of 12 items each, was considered sufficient use of the earlier Spanish trade mark (paras 68-77).
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit, EU:C:2006:310 Dokazi o prodaji koncentriranih voćnih sokova jednom kupcu u Španjolskoj tijekom razdoblja od 11,5 mjeseci, s ukupnim prometom u visini 4 800 EUR, što odgovara prodaji 293 kutije od po 12 sokova svaka, smatraju se dostatnima za dokazivanje uporabe ranijeg španjolskog žiga (t. 68. - 77.).
08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298 As evidence of use, the opponent (merely) provided several catalogues for end consumers, featuring the relevant trade mark on clothing articles.
08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298 Podnositelj prigovora kao dokaz o uporabi dostavio je (samo) nekoliko kataloga za krajnje potrošače u kojima je predmetni žig prikazan na odjevnim predmetima.
The Court held that ‘…it is true that those catalogues provide no information on the quantity of goods actually sold by the intervener under the trade mark PETER STORM.
Sud je smatrao da „[...] je istina da u katalozima nema nikakvih informacija o količini proizvoda koje je posrednik stvarno prodao pod žigom PETER STORM.
However, it is necessary to take into account … the fact that a large number of items designated by the trade mark PETER STORM were offered in the catalogues and that those items were available in more than 240 shops in the United Kingdom for a significant part of the relevant period.
Ipak, treba uzeti u obzir [...] činjenicu da je velik broj predmeta označenih žigom PETER STORM bio ponuđen u katalozima i da su ti predmeti bili dostupni u više od 240 trgovina u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini tijekom znatnog dijela relevantnog razdoblja.
Those factors support the conclusion, in the context of a global assessment … that the extent of its use was fairly significant' (paras 42 to 43).
Tim se čimbenicima podupire zaključak u kontekstu cjelovite procjene [...] da je opseg njegove uporabe bio prilično značajan” (t. 42. i 43.).
04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY The sale of approximately 1 000 miniature toy vehicles was considered sufficient extent of use in light of the products being sold mainly to collectors at a high price in a particular market.
04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY Smatralo se da prodaja oko 1 000 minijaturnih vozila igračaka upućuje na dostatan opseg uporabe proizvoda koji se na određenom tržištu prodaje po visokoj cijeni i pretežno kolekcionarima.
11/10/2010, R 571/20091, VitAmour / VITALARMOR The sale of 500 kg of milk proteins for a total value of EUR 11 000 was considered sufficient to prove genuine use for milk proteins for human consumption.
11/10/2010, R 571/20091, VitAmour / VITALARMOR Prodaja 500 kilograma mliječnih bjelančevina u ukupnoj vrijednosti od 11 000 EUR smatrala se dostatnom za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe mliječnih bjelančevina za prehranu ljudi.
In view of the nature of the products, which are not consumer goods but ingredients for use by the food processing industry, the amount and values shown did demonstrate a market presence above the threshold required.
S obzirom na narav proizvoda koji nisu namijenjeni širokoj potrošnji, već je riječ o sastojcima za uporabu u industriji prerade hrane, prikazana količina i vrijednosti dokazuju prisutnost na tržištu iznad potrebnog praga.
27/07/2011, R 1123/20104, Duracryl / DURATINT et al. Eleven invoices made out to different undertakings in various regions of Spain, showing that the proprietor of the mark sold, in the relevant period and under the mark, 311 containers of the product, in different sizes, for a net amount of EUR 2 684, were deemed sufficient to prove genuine use of a mark registered for preservatives against deterioration of wood in Class 2.
27/07/2011, R 1123/20104, Duracryl / DURATINT et al. Jedanaest računa koji glase na različita poduzeća u različitim dijelovima Španjolske i koji pokazuju da je nositelj žiga u relevantnom razdoblju pod žigom prodao 311 spremnika proizvoda različitih veličina za neto iznos od 2 684 EUR, smatralo se dostatnima za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe žiga koji je registriran za konzervanse protiv propadanja drva u razredu 2.
01/02/2011, B 1 563 066 An annual turnover of more than EUR 10 million over several years was claimed for medical preparations.
01/02/2011, B 1 563 066 Nositelj je tvrdio da je ostvario godišnji promet medicinskih preparata veći od 10 milijuna EUR tijekom nekoliko godina.
The corresponding invoices (one per relevant year) only proved actual sales of about EUR 20 per year.
Odgovarajućim računima (jedan za svaku relevantnu godinu) dokazana je samo stvarna prodaja od oko 20 EUR godišnje.
In an overall assessment, and in the context of further material submitted, such as price lists, a sworn statement, packaging and advertising material, the Office found this sufficient to prove genuine use.
U cjelokupnoj procjeni i uz dodatni podneseni materijal, kao što su cjenici, prisegnute izjave, ambalaža i reklamni materijal, Ured je navedeno smatrao dostatnim dokazom stvarne uporabe.
26/01/2001, B 150 039 The Opposition Division regarded evidence of sales of around 2 000 furry toy animals in a high-priced market sector as sufficient.
26/01/2001, B 150 039 Odjel za prigovore smatrao je dostatnima dokaze o prodaji oko 2 000 plišanih igračaka životinja u tržišnom sektoru koji karakteriziraju visoke cijene.
18/06/2001, B 167 488 The opponent submitted one invoice referring to the sale of one high-precision laser cutting machine for FRF 565 000, a catalogue describing its performance and some photographs depicting the product.
18/06/2001, B 167 488 Podnositelj prigovora podnio je jedan račun koji se odnosi na prodaju jednog laserskog uređaja za rezanje visoke preciznosti za 565 000 FRF, katalog u kojemu se opisuju svojstva uređaja i nekoliko fotografija s prikazom proizvoda.
The Opposition Division considered them as sufficient evidence taking into account the nature of the product, the specific market and its considerably high price.
Odjel za prigovore smatrao ih je dostatnim dokazima, uzimajući u obzir narav proizvoda, specifično tržište i njegovu poprilično visoku cijenu.
Case No Registered mark Actual use Comment
Broj predmeta Registrirani žig Stvarna uporaba Napomena
12/12/2014, T105/13, TrinkFix Drinkfit Relevant goods were beverages in Classes 29 and 32.
12/12/2014, T105/13, TrinkFix Drinkfit Relevantni proizvodi bili su pića iz razreda 29. i 32.
The labels on bottles of beverages are narrow, so it is not unusual for a word mark to be written on two lines (para. 47).
Etikete na bocama pića uske su te stoga nije neuobičajeno da se verbalni znak piše u dva reda (t. 47.).
Registered form Actual use Case No
Registrirani oblik Stvarna uporaba Broj predmeta
‘In the present case the mark CRISTAL appears clearly four times on the neck of the bottle marketed by the intervener and twice on the main label, accompanied by the symbol ®.
„Žig CRISTAL u tom se slučaju jasno pojavljuje četiri puta na vratu boce koju je posrednik stavio na tržište i dva puta na glavnoj etiketi, a prati ga simbol ®.
On the neck, that mark is separate from the other elements.
Žig na vratu boce odvojen je od ostalih elemenata.
In addition, the mark CRISTAL appears alone on the boxes in which bottles of the mark CRISTAL are marketed.
Osim toga, žig CRISTAL pojavljuje se sam na kutijama u kojima se prodaju boce sa žigom CRISTAL.
Equally, on the invoices produced by the intervener reference is made to the term “cristal” with the mention “1990 coffret”.
Jednako tako, na računima posrednika navedeno je upućivanje na izraz ,cristal' nakon kojeg slijedi ,1990 coffret'.
It should be noted that the mark CRISTAL thus identifies the product marketed by the intervener' (para. 35).
Treba napomenuti da žig CRISTAL u ovom slučaju identificira proizvod koji posrednik prodaje” (t. 35.).
‘As regards the mention “Louis Roederer” on the main label, it merely indicates the name of the manufacturer's company, which may provide a direct link between one or more product lines and a specific undertaking.
„Kada je riječ o navodu ,Louis Roederer' na glavnoj etiketi, on samo upućuje na naziv poduzeća proizvođača, kojim se može uspostaviti izravna veza između jedne ili više proizvodnih linija i određenog poduzeća.
The same reasoning applies to the group of letters “lr”, which represents the initials of the intervener's name.
Isto obrazloženje primjenjuje se i na skupinu slova ,lr' koja predstavlja inicijale imena posrednika.
As pointed out by [the Office], joint use of those elements on the same bottle does not undermine the function of the mark CRISTAL as a means of identifying the products at issue' (para. 36).
Kao što je [Ured] istaknuo, zajednička uporaba tih elemenata na istoj boci ne umanjuje svrhu žiga CRISTAL kao sredstva za identificiranje predmetnih proizvoda” (t. 36.).
‘Furthermore, [the Office's] finding that the use of the word mark together with the geographical indication “Champagne” cannot be considered to be an addition capable of altering the distinctive character of the trade mark when used for champagne must be endorsed.
„Osim toga, treba podržati zaključak [Ureda] da se uporaba verbalnog žiga zajedno sa zemljopisnom oznakom ,Champagne' ne može smatrati dodatkom koji može promijeniti razlikovni karakter žiga ako se on upotrebljava za šampanjac.
In the wine sector the consumer is often particularly interested in the precise geographical origin of the product and the identity of the wine producer, since the reputation of such products often depends on whether the wine is produced in a certain geographical region by a certain winery' (para. 37).
Potrošač u sektoru vina često je posebno zainteresiran za precizno zemljopisno podrijetlo proizvoda i identitet proizvođača vina zato što ugled takvih proizvoda često ovisi o tome proizvodi li određena vinarija vino na nekom određenom zemljopisnom području” (t. 37.).
Registered form Actual use Case No
Delegirane uredbe o žigu EU-a]” (t. 38.).
L.114 is a French trade mark registered for pharmaceutical products in Class 5.
L.114 francuski je žig koji je registriran za farmaceutske proizvode u razredu 5.
The Court found that: 1) the missing full-stop between the capital letter ‘L' and the number 114 constituted a minor difference that did not deprive earlier mark L.114 of its distinctive character (para. 53).
Sud je utvrdio da: izostavljena točka između velikog slova „L” i broja 114 čini manju razliku koja nije utjecala na umanjenje razlikovnog karaktera ranijeg žiga L.114 (t. 53.).
2) ‘Lehning' was the house mark.
„Lehning” je bio matični žig.
The fact that earlier mark ‘L.114' was used together with that house mark did not alter its distinctive character within the meaning of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 [now Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR] (para. 53).
Činjenica da se raniji žig „L.114” upotrebljavao zajedno s tim matičnim žigom nije mijenjala razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga u smislu članka 15. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EZ) 207/2009 [koji je postao članak 18. stavak 1. točka (a) Uredbe o žigu EU-a] (t. 53.).
YGAY YGAY together with a number of other verbal and figurative elements 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai
YGAY YGAY zajedno s više drugih verbalnih i figurativnih elemenata 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; potvrđeno 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai
In the Board's decision (confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) it was pointed out that the trade mark YGAY appears in many photographs on both the label and the box in which the bottle is sold.
U odluci vijeća (potvrđenoj 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) istaknuto je da se žig „YGAY” pojavljuje na mnogobrojnim fotografijama na etiketi i na kutiji u kojoj se prodaje boca.
On the labels, the trade mark in question is separated from the other elements.
Predmetni je žig na etiketama odvojen od ostalih elemenata.
On some labels, it appears on its own, beneath the phrase MARQUES DE MURRIETA, written in large bold letters.
Na nekim se etiketama pojavljuje sam, ispod natpisa MARQUES DE MURRIETA, napisanog velikim podebljanim slovima.
On others, the phrase BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA is written in small letters in the upper part, while the elements CASTILLO YGAY are written in large, stylised letters across the label.
Na ostalim etiketama natpis BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA napisan je malim slovima u gornjem dijelu, a elementi CASTILLO YGAY napisani su velikim stiliziranim slovima preko etikete.
The trade mark YGAY also appears on its own or together with the phrase CASTILLO YGAY on the boxes in which the bottles are sold.
Žig YGAY pojavljuje se i samostalno ili zajedno s natpisom CASTILLO YGAY na kutijama u kojima se prodaju boce.
Reference is also made, on the invoices submitted by the opponent, to the trade mark YGAY, along with general information such as the year of production and origin, etc. It follows, therefore, that the sign YGAY functions as the trade mark identifying the goods, wine, sold by the opponent (para. 15).
Na računima koje je podnio podnositelj prigovora stoji i upućivanje na žig YGAY, uz opće informacije kao što je godina proizvodnje i podrijetlo itd. Iz toga proizlazi da žig YGAY funkcionira kao žig kojim se identificiraju proizvodi, odnosno vino, koje podnositelj prigovora prodaje (t. 15.).
Mark No 1 Mark No 2 18/04/2013, C12/12, Colloseum Holding
2 18/04/2013, C12/12, Colloseum Holding
Levi Strauss is the proprietor of the two EUTMs reproduced above.
Levi Strauss nositelj je dvaju prethodno reproduciranih žigova EU-a.
The Court found that the condition of ‘genuine use' may be fulfilled where an EU figurative mark is used only in conjunction with an EU word mark that is superimposed over it, and the combination of those two marks is, furthermore, itself registered as a European Union trade mark, to the extent that the differences between the form in which the trade mark is used and that in which it was registered do not change the distinctive character of the trade mark as registered.
2. Sud je smatrao da uvjet „stvarne uporabe” može biti ispunjen ako se figurativni žig EU-a upotrebljava samo u kombinaciji s verbalnim žigom EU-a koji se nalazi iznad njega, a kombinacija je osim toga sama po sebi registrirana kao žig Europske unije, ako se razlikama između oblika u kojem se taj žig upotrebljava i oblika u kojem je registriran ne mijenja razlikovni karakter tog žiga kako je registriran.
Specsavers commenced proceedings for trade mark infringement and passing off on the basis of the earlier EUTM SPECSAVERS (word mark), as well as the figurative signs , and , against ASDA, a supermarket chain, which relaunched its optical business and targeted Specsavers in its marketing campaign.
Grupacija Specsavers pokrenula je postupak zbog povrede žiga i zavaravajućeg označivanja na temelju ranijeg žiga EU-a SPECSAVERS (verbalni žig) i figurativnih žigova i protiv lanca supermarketa ASDA koji je ponovno pokrenuo svoje poslovanje u sektoru optike te pokrenuo reklamnu kampanju koja je bila usmjerena na Specsavers.
Specsavers used its black and white registrations in colour and acquired reputation in the UK for the colour green, using its sign as follows: .
Gurpacija Specsavers upotrebljavala je svoje crno-bijele registracije u boji i stekao ugled u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini za zelenu boju, upotrebljavajući svoj znak kako slijedi: .
ASDA also acquired reputation in the UK for another shade of green in its supermarket business and applied it to the optical business: .
Lanac ASDA je također stekao ugled u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini za drugu nijansu zelene boje u sektoru supermarketa i primijenio je na poslovanje u sektoru optike: .
The Court found that the use of with the superimposed word sign may be considered genuine use of the wordless logo mark to the extent that the wordless logo mark as registered always refers in that form to the goods of the Specsavers group (to be determined by the referring court) (para. 24).
Sud je isto tako smatrao da se uporaba s verbalnim žigom koji se nalazi iznad njega može smatrati stvarnom uporabom žiga s logotipom bez natpisa ako taj žig s logotipom bez natpisa u obliku u kojem je registriran uvijek upućuje na proizvode grupacije Specsavers (utvrdit će sud koji je uputio zahtjev) (t. 24.).
The Board of Appeal regarded the presentation of the two words as the use of two separate marks, since the evidence submitted by the opponent showed that one of them was an old brand of the opponent with its own identity and was present on the market with a number of accompanying signs, as is common practice in the labelling of the specific products (wine).
Žalbeno vijeće smatralo je prikaz dviju riječi uporabom dvaju odvojenih žigova jer su dokazi koje je podnio podnositelj prigovora pokazali da je jedan od njih bila stara robna marka podnositelja prigovora s vlastitim identitetom i da je taj žig bio zastupljen na tržištu s mnogobrojnim pratećim znakovima, što je uobičajena praksa u etiketiranju određenih proizvoda (vino).
‘“DUBOIS” and “MINUTO” are separate marks that are affixed together in the concrete product, as is common practice in the labelling of wine products (name of the winery and name of the product).
„DUBOIS” i „MINUTO” odvojeni su žigovi koji zajedno označavaju konkretan proizvod, što je uobičajena praksa u etiketiranju vinskih proizvoda (ime vinarije i naziv proizvoda).
As regards Spanish brands, see for example “TORRES” - “Sangre de Toro”, “TORRES” - “Acqua d'Or”.
U pogledu španjolskih marki pogledajte na primjer „TORRES” - „Sangre de Toro”, „TORRES” - „Acqua d'Or”.
When asking for “MINUTO” wine, the relevant consumer will be aware that such wine is included within the line of products “DUBOIS”, however, “MINUTO” will be perceived as a trade mark of its own, even if it may appear next to the sign ”DUBOIS” in the invoices, brochures and/or product labels' (para. 18).
Kada se relevantni potrošač zanima za vino „MINUTO”, on zna da je to vino dio proizvodne linije „DUBOIS”, međutim, „MINUTO” se doživljava kao žig sam za sebe, čak i ako se na računima, u brošurama i/ili etiketama proizvoda pojavljuje pored znaka „DUBOIS” (t. 18.).
The General Court confirmed that the use of the mark Coloris with additional word elements such as ‘global coloring concept' or ‘gcc' did not alter its distinctive character because the additional elements were merely used together with the mark Coloris and positioned below it and were of such a size that they were not predominant in the mark.
Opći sud potvrdio je da uporaba žiga „Coloris” s dodatnim verbalnim elementima, kao na primjer „global coloring concept” ili „gcc” nije promijenila razlikovni karakter žiga, zbog toga što su dodatni elementi samo upotrijebljeni zajedno sa žigom „Coloris” i smješteni ispod njega, pri čemu njihova veličina nije dominirala u predmetnom žigu.
The same finding applies with even greater force to the additional words (global coloring concept) as ‘they are words with a general meaning.
Isti zaključak primjenjuje se tim više na dodatne riječi (global coloring concept), zbog toga što su to „riječi općeg značenja”.
Furthermore, the word “coloring” refers to the goods concerned and, consequently, has a certain descriptive character' (para. 31).
Nadalje, riječ „coloring” odnosi se na predmetne proizvode i prema tome ima određeni opisni karakter (t. 31.).
The Court indicated that ‘the fact that, in that newspaper article, the names of the funds are composed of the term “halder”, to which a number in Roman numerals has been added, is not such as to call into question the conclusion on use of the mark, since, because of their brevity, their weak distinctive character and their ancillary position, those additions do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered' (para. 58).
Sud je naveo da „činjenica da se u tom novinskom članku imena fondova sastoje od izraza „halder” kojem je dodan rimski broj nije takav da dovede u pitanje zaključak o uporabi žiga, zato što ti dodatci, zbog svoje kratkoće, slabog razlikovnog karaktera i sporednog položaja, ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga u obliku u kojem je registriran” (t. 58.).
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; confirmed 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; potvrđeno 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI
The figurative signs reproduced in the evidence of use contain the distinctive elements of the earlier mark and those elements are clearly visible on the labels.
Figurativni znakovi reproducirani u dokazu o uporabi sadržavaju razlikovne elemente ranijeg žiga, a ti su elementi jasno vidljivi na etiketama.
The inversion of the figurative and word elements of the sign and the additional indication of the respective appellation of origin (Soave, Soave Superiore and Chianti) do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark, which appears reproduced in the sign with all its distinctive elements.
Preokretanje figurativnih i verbalnih elemenata znaka i dodatne naznake odgovarajuće oznake podrijetla (Soave, Soave Superiore i Chianti) ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga čija se reprodukcija pojavljuje u znaku sa svim njegovim razlikovnim elementima.
Consumers of wines are particularly interested in knowing the precise geographical origin of these products; however, the addition of this information about the geographical origin of the goods is not capable of altering the distinctive character of a trade mark in its essential function of identifying a particular commercial origin (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19).
Potrošači vina posebno su zainteresirani za informaciju o točnom zemljopisnom podrijetlu tih proizvoda; međutim, dodavanje takvih informacija o zemljopisnom podrijetlu proizvoda ne može promijeniti razlikovni karakter žiga pri ispunjavanju svoje osnovne funkcije utvrđivanja određenog komercijalnog podrijetla (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19).
The Court stated that the term ‘line', synonymous with the German word ‘Linie', is commonly used in advertising and business in relation to a product line.
Sud je utvrdio da se engleski izraz „line” (linija), istoznačan njemačkom izrazu „Linie”, često upotrebljava u oglašavanju i poslovanju kada je riječ o proizvodnim linijama.
It is likely to be perceived automatically as an additional element by the average consumer, particularly in Germany.
Prosječni potrošač vjerojatno će ga automatski doživjeti kao dodatni element, posebno u Njemačkoj.
The Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the term ‘line' did not alter the distinctive character of the disputed mark and that use of this trade mark in combination with this term was a use of that mark (paras 26-27).
Sud se složio sa žalbenim vijećem da izraz „line” ne mijenja razlikovni karakter osporavanog žiga te da se uporaba tog žiga u kombinaciji s tim izrazom može smatrati uporabom tog žiga (t. 26. - 27.).
AINHOA AINHOA in combination with ‘BIO', ‘LUXE', ‘MINERAL PASSION', ‘SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE' or 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669
AINHOA AINHOA u kombinaciji s „BIO”, „LUXE”, „MINERAL PASSION”, „SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE” ili 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669
The figurative element consists of a square representing the sky, with clouds concentrated in the lower part of the square.
Figurativni element sastoji se od kvadrata koji predstavlja nebo, s oblacima smještenima u donjem dijelu kvadrata.
This element has no obvious connection with the goods in question, and is not original.
Taj element nema očitu vezu s predmetnim proizvodima i nije izvorni element.
Therefore, and taking into account its size and accessory position, it does not alter the overall impression produced by the mark at issue.
Dakle, uzimajući u obzir i njegovu veličinu i sporedni položaj, on ne mijenja ukupni dojam stvoren predmetnim žigom.
The use of the figurative element must be regarded as an acceptable variation of the contested mark.
Uporaba figurativnog elementa mora se smatrati prihvatljivom varijantom osporavanog žiga.