natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The German public understands the meaning of these two basic words as well as the combination thereof (paras 31-35).
Njemačka javnost razumije značenje tih dviju osnovnih riječi kao i njihovu kombinaciju (točke 31. - 35.).
Furthermore, for some goods in Class 12, it must be held that that word can also designate one of their purposes.
Nadalje, za određene proizvode iz razreda 12. treba smatrati da ta riječ može označavati i jednu od njihovih namjena.
Furthermore, as is apparent from the evidence adduced by the applicant, the word ‘force' is commonly used, on the European market, in trade marks in the domain of cycling, thus rendering it banal (paras 38-39).
Osim toga, kao što je očito iz dokaza koje je iznio podnositelj prijave, riječ „force” obično se na europskom tržištu upotrebljava u žigovima iz područja biciklizma, što je čini banalnom (t. 38. - 39.).
Even if it is not negligible in terms of its size, the figurative element of the contested EUTM is likely to be perceived by consumers essentially as a mere decorative element, and not as an element indicating the commercial origin of the goods (para. 43).
Čak i ako nije zanemariv u pogledu veličine, figurativni element osporavanog žiga EU-a potrošači će vjerojatno u osnovi percipirati tek kao ukrasni element, a ne kao element koji označava trgovačko podrijetlo proizvoda (t. 43.).
The marks are visually highly similar and phonetically and conceptually identical (paras 45-48).
Žigovi su vizualno vrlo slični te fonetski i konceptualno istovjetni (t. 45. - 48.).
Sign Dominant component and reasoning Case No
Znak Dominantna sastavnica i obrazloženje Predmet br.
RPT: ‘the dominant element of the earlier marks is the acronym RPT, in which the letter “p” predominates' (para. 33).
RPT: „dominantni element ranijih žigova jest akronim RPT na kojem je istaknuto slovo ‚p' (t. 33.).
Free: ‘the word “free” dominates the visual impression created by the mark of which it forms part, because it is considerably larger than the other components and, in addition, is much easier to remember and pronounce than the slogan in question' (para. 39).
Free: „riječ ‚free' (besplatno) ističe se u vizualnom dojmu koji ostavlja žig čiji je ona dio jer je ta riječ znatno veća od drugih sastavnica i usto ju je jednostavnije zapamtiti i izgovoriti od predmetnog slogana” (t. 39.).
Xtreme: ‘On the visual level, it must be concluded that in the mark applied for, the term “XTREME” occupies a central position.
Xtreme: „Na vizualnoj razini mora se zaključiti da na žigu za koji je podnesena prijava pojam „XTREME” zauzima središnji položaj.
(by missako) GREEN by missako: ‘It must be noted, as a first point, that the representation of the sun has an important place within the mark applied for, in that it is positioned in the centre and covers almost two thirds of the area.
(by missako) GREEN by missako: „Mora se napomenuti da je, kao prvo, prikaz sunca na žigu za koji je podnesena prijava važan jer se nalazi u središtu i obuhvaća gotovo dvije trećine cijelog žiga.
Next, the position of the word element “green” is also important within the mark, as it is portrayed in large-typeface, stylised upper case letters in black and takes up about one third of the area.
Zatim, položaj verbalnog elementa „green” također je važan na žigu jer je element prikazan velikim crnim stiliziranim slovima i zauzima gotovo trećinu cijelog žiga.
As observed by the Board of Appeal in para. 28 of the contested decision, those two elements thus occupy the major portion of the mark applied for and are, therefore, striking in the overall impression of the mark.
Kao što je napomenulo Žalbeno vijeće u t. 28. pobijane odluke, ta dva elementa stoga zauzimaju većinu žiga za koji je podnesena prijava zbog čega se ističu u ukupnom dojmu žiga.
Lastly, as regards the word element “by missako”, the Board of Appeal correctly held, in para. 28 of the contested decision, that those words were almost illegible because of their size and that the handwriting made them difficult to decipher.
Konačno, u pogledu verbalnog elementa „by missako”, Žalbeno vijeće točno je utvrdilo u t. 28. pobijane odluke da su te riječi gotovo nečitljive zbog svoje veličine i da ih je zbog rukopisa teško odgonetnuti.
It follows, first, that the dominant nature of the word “green” and of the representation of the sun are thereby further reinforced and, secondly, that the word element “by missako” is negligible in nature' (paras 37-39).
Iz toga slijedi da su, kao prvo, dominantna priroda riječi „green” i prikaza sunca time dodatno pojačani te, kao drugo, da je verbalni element „by missako” sam po sebi zanemariv.” (t. 37. - 39.).
BÜRGER: The dominant element of the mark applied for is undeniably the word element in upper case letters that stands out, simply because of its position and the very large size of its lettering, from all the other elements that make up the label (para. 38).
BÜRGER: Dominantni element žiga za koji je podnesena prijava neosporno je riječ pisana velikim slovima koja se već zbog svojeg položaja i veličine slova ističe u odnosu na sve druge elemente koji sačinjavaju naljepnicu (t. 38.).
BABIDU babilu 31/01/2013, T66/11, EU:T:2013:48 (high)
BABIDU babilu 31/01/2013, T66/11, EU:T:2013:48 (visoka)
MEDINETTE MESILETTE 13/06/2012, T342/10, EU:T:2012:290 (average)
MEDINETTE MESILETTE 13/06/2012, T342/10, EU:T:2012:290 (prosječna)
FORTIS FORIS 17/03/2003, R 49/20024 (high)
FORTIS FORIS 17/03/2003, R 49/2004 (visoka)
ARTEX ALREX 17/11/2005, T154/03, EU:T:2005:401 (very high)
ARTEX ALREX 17/11/2005, T154/03, EU:T:2005:401(vrlo visoka)
MARILA MARILAN 27/01/2011, R 799/20101 (high)
MARILA MARILAN 27/01/2011, R 799/20101 (visoka)
EPILEX E-PLEX 24/05/2011, T161/10, EU:T:2011:244 (average)
EPILEX E-PLEX 24/05/2011, T161/10, EU:T:2011:244 (prosječna)
CHALOU CHABOU 16/11/2011, T323/10, EU:T:2011:678 (high)
CHALOU CHABOU 16/11/2011, T323/10, EU:T:2011:678 (visoka)
CAPOL ARCOL 25/03/2009, T402/07, EU:T:2009:85; 04/03/2010, C193/09 P, EU:C:2010:121;
CAPOL ARCOL 25/03/2009, T402/07, EU:T:2009:85; 04/03/2010, T193/09 P, EU:C:2010:121;
The Board held that although those marks shared the letter ‘a' and the ending ‘ol', they ‘clearly differ[ed]' visually.
Vijeće je smatralo da iako ti žigovi imaju zajedničko slovo „a” i završetak „ol”, očito se „vizualno razlikuju”.
The General Court agreed.
Opći je sud bio suglasan.
It held that the same number of letters in two marks is not, as such, of any particular significance for the relevant public, even for a specialised public.
Smatrao je da jednak broj slova kod dvaju žigova sam po sebi nije posebno važan relevantnoj javnosti, pa ni stručnoj javnosti.
Since the alphabet is made up of a limited number of letters, which, moreover, are not all used with the same frequency, it is inevitable that many words will have the same number of letters and even share some of them, but they cannot, for that reason alone, be regarded as visually similar.
Budući da se abeceda sastoji od ograničenog broja slova koja se, štoviše, ne upotrebljavaju jednakom učestalošću, neizbježno je da će brojne riječi imati jednak broj slova i čak njihov udio, no samo iz tog razloga ne može ih se smatrati vizualno sličnima.
In addition, the public is not, in general, aware of the exact number of letters in a word mark and, consequently, will not notice, in the majority of cases, that two conflicting marks have the same number of letters (paras 81-82).
Osim toga, javnost općenito nije svjesna točnog broja slova u žigu i stoga u većini slučajeva neće primijetiti da dva oprečna žiga imaju jednak broj slova (t. 81. - 82.)
The Court held that what matters in the assessment of the visual similarity of two word marks is the presence, in each of them, of several letters in the same order (para. 83).
Sud je smatrao da je u procjeni vizualne sličnosti žigova bitna prisutnost nekoliko slova u jednakom redoslijedu u svakom od njih (t. 83.).
The ending ‘ol' of the marks at issue constituted a common element of the marks but comes at the end and is preceded by completely different groups of letters (‘arc' and ‘cap' respectively), so the Board of Appeal correctly concluded that that this commonality does not render the marks visually similar (para. 83).
Završetak „ol” u predmetnim žigovima zajednički je element žigova no stoji na kraju i prethodi mu potpuno različita skupina slova („arc” i „cap”), stoga je Žalbeno vijeće točno zaključilo da to zajedničko obilježje ne čini žigove vizualno sličnima (t. 83.).
The Court of Justice upheld this assessment from a visual perspective (para. 74).
Sud je podržao tu procjenu iz vizualne perspektive (t. 74.).
VITAFIT 25/10/2012, T552/10, EU:T:2012:576 (average)
VITAFIT 25/10/2012, T552/10, EU:T:2012:576 (prosječna)
COTO DE IMAZ 04/02/2010, R 409/20091 (high)
COTO DE IMAZ 04/02/2010, R 409/20091 (visoka)
vendus sales & communication group 15/07/2010, R 994/20094 (high)
vendus sales & communication group 15/07/2010, R 994/20094 (visoka)
15/03/2012, T379/08, EU:T:2012:125 (average)
15/03/2012, T379/08, EU:T:2012:125 (prosječna)
11/03/2009, B 1 157 769 (medium)
11/03/2009, R 1 157 769 (srednja)
11/10/2010, B 1 572 059
11/10/2010, R 1 572 059
03/09/2007, R 1454/20054; confirmed 18/06/2009, T418/07, EU:T:2009:208 (average)
03/09/2007, R 1454/20054; potvrđeno 18/06/2009, T418/07, EU:T:2009:208 (prosječna)
16/01/2014, T383/12, EU:T:2014:12 (high)
16/01/2014, T383/12, EU:T:2014:12 (visoka)
14/12/2006, T81/03, T82/03 & T103/03, EU:T:2006:397 (significant)
14/12/2006, T81/03, T82/03 i T103/03, EU:T:2006:397 (znatna)
(i) (ii) 17/11/2010, R 144/20102 (low)
(i) (ii) 17/11/2010, R 144/20102 (niska)
30/05/2002, B 134 900 The marks were considered visually dissimilar
30/05/2002, B 134 900 Utvrđeno je da su žigovi vizualno različiti.
That dominant element makes an immediate impression and is remembered.
Dominantni element trenutno ostavlja dojam i pamti se.
Conversely, the graphic differences between the trade marks in question - namely the shape of the background (oval for the trade mark applied for and square for the earlier trade mark), the position of the letter on that background (in the centre in the case of the trade mark applied for and in the lower right-hand corner in the case of the earlier trade mark), the thickness of the line used to represent that letter (the trade mark applied for uses a slightly broader line than that used in the earlier trade mark) and the calligraphic details of the letters of the respective marks - are minor and do not constitute elements that will be remembered by the relevant public as effective distinguishing features.
S druge strane, grafičke razlike između predmetnih žigova, konkretno oblik pozadine (ovalan za prijavljeni žig i pravokutan za raniji žig), položaj slova na pozadini (u središtu u slučaju prijavljenog žiga i u donjem desnom kutu u slučaju ranijeg žiga), debljina crte kojom se prikazuje slovo (prijavljeni žig ima malo širu crtu od ranijeg žiga) i kaligrafski detalji slova na žigovima, neznatne su i ne predstavljaju elemente koje će relevantna javnost upamtiti kao djelotvorna razlikovna obilježja.
Consequently, the conflicting signs are very similar from the visual point of view.
Stoga su suprotstavljeni znakovi vrlo slični s vizualnog aspekta.
The outcome of this case: likelihood of confusion for identical goods and services (this part of the BoA decision was not challenged before the General Court).
Ishod ovog predmeta: vjerojatnost dovođenja u zabludu u pogledu istovjetnih proizvoda i usluga (ovaj dio odluke Žalbenog vijeća nije osporavan pred Općim sudom).
No likelihood of confusion for the similar and dissimilar goods and services (inter alia, electric energy emanating from wind power; plants for the production of renewable energy; leasing of wind power energy generating facilities) for which the relevant public has a high degree of attention.
Ne postoji vjerojatnost dovođenja u zabludu za slične i različite proizvode i usluge (među ostalim, električna energija koja proizlazi iz vjetra; postrojenja za proizvodnju obnovljive energije, iznajmljivanje postrojenja za proizvodnju električne energije iz vjetra) na koje relevantna javnost iznimno obraća pozornost.
A phonetic comparison was not possible, as it was found that the public would most likely not pronounce the contested trade mark given the particular graphic design (para. 32).
Fonetska usporedba nije bila moguća jer je utvrđeno da javnost vjerojatno ne bi izgovarala osporeni žig s obzirom na konkretni grafički dizajn (t. 32.).
Please note that the outcome in this case was that of no likelihood of confusion, although the Court found low visual similarity between the signs.
Treba napomenuti da je ishod ovog slučaja bilo nepostojanje vjerojatnosti dovođenja u zabludu iako je Sud utvrdio malu vizualnu sličnost između znakova.
The outcome of this case was that of no likelihood of confusion.
Ishod je tog predmeta bilo nepostojanje vjerojatnosti zablude.
The EUTM applied for is a complex graphic device that includes a black lowercase letter ‘m' and in addition, other significant figurative elements, namely a bold curved dark line placed above a background circle in which the letter ‘m' is almost included.
Prijavljeni žig EU-a složeni je grafički prikaz koji uključuje crno malo slovo „m” i druge značajne figurativne elemente, konkretno podebljanu zakrivljenu tamnu crtu postavljenu iznad pozadinskog kruga u koji je slovo „m” gotovo uključeno.
These additional elements are of particular importance since the heavy bold line echoes the form of the background circle and the dark shade of the letter ‘m', which is placed over the background.
Ti su dodatni elementi posebno važni jer krupna podebljana crta odražava oblik pozadinskog kruga i tamni obris slova „m” koje je postavljeno preko pozadine.
In the earlier mark, the letter ‘m' appears in outline font with a characteristic inclination to the right and an uneven height so that the right-hand size of the letter is lower.
U ranijem se žigu slovo „m” pojavljivalo u obrisima uz svojstveno naginjanje udesno i nejednaku visinu tako da je desna strana slova niža.
Consequently, these dissimilarities between the signs are sufficient for it to be held that they do not give the consumer the same visual impression (para. 18).
Stoga su te različitosti između znakova dovoljne da bi se smatralo kako ti znakovi na potrošača ne ostavljaju jednak vizualni dojam (t. 18.).
04/10/2010, R 576/20102; confirmed 24/01/2012, T593/10, EU:T:2012:25
04/10/2010, R 576/20102; potvrđeno 24/01/2012, T593/10, EU:T:2012:25
Visually, the earlier mark can be perceived as a boomerang, accompanied by the letter ‘B', which is the first letter of ‘boomerang'.
Vizualno se raniji žig može percipirati kao bumerang uz koji stoji slovo „B”, prvo slovo riječi „bumerang”.
09/11/2010, R 806/20094, para. 19 (low)
09/11/2010, R 806/20094, t. 19 (niska)
04/03/2010, T24/08, EU:T:2010:71 (low)
04/03/2010, T24/08, EU:T:2010:71 (niska)
Earlier sign Contested sign Relevant territory Case No
Raniji znak Osporavani znak Relevantno područje Predmet br.
CAMEA BALEA EU 14/01/2015, T195/13, EU:T:2015:6 (low)
CAMEA BALEA EU 14/01/2015, T195/13, EU:T:2015:6 (niska)
PT: the part of the relevant public that has some knowledge of the English language will read and pronounce the earlier mark in the same way as the mark applied for insofar as the latter uses the English word ‘forever' (para. 70).
PT: dio relevantne javnosti koja posjeduje određeno znanje o engleskom jeziku čitat će i izgovarati raniji znak jednako kao prijavljeni žig ako je u potonjem engleska riječ „forever” (zauvijek) (t. 70.).
16/01/2014, T528/11, EU:T:2014:10 (identity/average)
16/01/2014, T528/11, EU:T:2014:10 (istovjetno/prosječno)
FEMARA EU 12/02/2010, R 722/20084 (above average)
FEMARA EU 12/02/2010, R 722/20084 (iznad prosjeka)
BX 16/09/2010, R 166/20101 (identity)
BX 16/09/2010, R 166/20101 (istovjetno)
DE 09/06/2010, R 1071/20091 (low)
DE 09/06/2010, R 1071/20091 (niska)
OLI SONE 16/04/2010, B 1 269 549
OLI SONE 16/04/2010, R 1 269 549
DNG 15/09/2010, R 160/20102 The ampersand ‘&' will be pronounced in most European Union languages and is recognised as the corresponding translation of the conjunction ‘and'.
DNG 15/09/2010, R 160/20102 Znak „&” izgovara se u većini jezika Europske unije i prepoznaje kao odgovarajući prijevod veznika „i”.
VODAFONE AT HOME 30/08/2010, R 138/20102 @ will be pronounced as ‘at' or ‘arobase' in the Benelux (para. 21).
VODAFONE AT HOME 30/08/2010, R 138/20102 @ se izgovara kao „at” ili „arobase” u Beneluksu (t. 21.).
03/02/2011, R 719/20101; dismissed 19/09/2012, T220/11, EU:T:2012:444; dismissed 14/11/2013, C524/12 P, EU:C:2013:874 The @ will be perceived as the letter ‘a' by (at least) the EN public (para. 25).
03/02/2011, R 719/20101; odbačen 19/09/2012, T220/11, EU:T:2012:444; odbačen 14/11/2013, T524/12 P, EU:C:2013:874 (Barem) engleski potrošači smatrat će znak @ slovom „a” (t. 25.).
20/07/2016, T745/14, EU:T:2016:423 The symbol ‘@' will easily be understood by the consumer as replacing the letter ‘a' (para. 26).
20/07/2016, T745/14, EU:T:2016:423 Potrošači će odmah razumjeti da „@” zamjenjuje slovo „a” (t. 26.).
AirPlus International 03/03/2010, T321/07, EU:T:2010:64; dismissed 25/11/2010, C216/10 P, EU:C:2010:719
AirPlus International 03/03/2010, T321/07, EU:T:2010:64; odbačen 25/11/2010, T216/10 P, EU:C:2010:719
Sign Explanation
Znak Obrazloženje
T593/10 In this figurative mark, the letter ‘B' can be read.
T593/10 Slovo „B” na ovom figurativnom žigu može se pročitati.
The mark must, therefore, be assessed phonetically.
Žig stoga mora proći fonetsku procjenu.
T593/10 In this figurative mark, the letter ‘B' is so highly distorted that the Court found that for part of the public it is difficult to clearly identify if it is indeed the letter ‘b' or the figure ‘8'.
T593/10 Na ovom je figurativnom žigu slovo „B” toliko izobličeno da je Sud utvrdio da je dijelu javnosti teško jasno odrediti je li doista riječ o slovu „B” ili broju „8”.
22/06/2011, R 1779/20104 It is very difficult to determine the pronunciation of the sign.
22/06/2011, R 1779/20104 Vrlo je teško utvrditi izgovor znaka.
An aural comparison may, therefore, lead to very different results, ranging from identity to dissimilarity.
Zvučna bi usporedba stoga mogla dovesti do vrlo različitih rezultata, od istovjetnosti do različitosti.
28/01/2009, B 1 127 416 In this figurative mark the letter ‘H' can be read and, therefore, must be assessed phonetically.
28/01/2009, R 1 127 416 Slovo „H” na ovom figurativnom žigu može se pročitati i stoga mora proći fonetsku procjenu.
28/01/2009, B 1 127 416 In this sign, the pattern makes it unlikely that consumers will read an ‘H' (or rather several ‘H's).
28/01/2009, R 1 127 416 Na ovom znaku uzorak onemogućuje potrošačima čitanje slova „H” (ili nekoliko slova „H”).
This mark cannot be assessed phonetically.
Taj se znak ne može fonetski procijeniti.
16/10/2013, T282/12, EU:T:2013:533 The Court held that, although hardly legible at first sight, the words ‘FREE' and ‘STYLE' in both of the signs are pronounced identically regardless of the language of the public.
16/10/2013, T282/12, EU:T:2013:533 Sud je smatrao da, iako su na prvi pogled teško čitljive, riječi „FREE” i „STYLE” na oba znaka izgovaraju se jednako, neovisno o jeziku javnosti.
VITS4KIDS Kids Vits 09/12/2009, T484/08, EU:T:2009:486; dismissed 22/10/2010, C84/10 P, EU:C:2010:628 (significant)
VITS4KIDS Kids Vits 09/12/2009, T484/08, EU:T:2009:486; odbačen 22/10/2010, T84/10 P, EU:C:2010:628 (znatna)
11/06/2009, T67/08, EU:T:2009:198 (high)
11/06/2009, T67/08, EU:T:2009:198 (visoka)
LIDL LIFEL 19/10/2010, R 410/20101 The first two letters and the last one are the same in both marks.
LIDL LIFEL 19/10/2010, R 410/20101 Prva dva slova i posljednje slovo jednaki su u oba žiga.
Aurally, the similarity is even stronger because LIDL will often be pronounced as if spelt LIDEL.
Na zvučnoj razini sličnost je još veća jer se LIDL često izgovara kao da je napisano LIDEL.
For phonological reasons, ‘D' and ‘L' are nearly impossible to pronounce in most languages without inserting a vowel between them.
Iz fonoloških je razloga u većini jezika gotovo nemoguće izgovoriti D i L bez umetanja samoglasnika između njih.
Therefore, the marks would be pronounced LIFEL and LIDEL in languages like French, German, Italian and Spanish.
Stoga bi se znakovi izgovarali LIFEL i LIDEL u jezicima kao što su francuski, njemački, talijanski i francuski.
KAN-OPHTAL PAN-OPHTAL BAÑOFTAL 12/07/2012, T346/09, EU:T:2012:368 The relevant territory is Germany.
KAN-OPHTAL PAN-OPHTAL BAÑOFTAL 12/07/2012, T346/09, EU:T:2012:368 Relevantno je područje Njemačka.
The Court found a phonetic similarity.
Sud je utvrdio fonetsku sličnost.
The German consumer will probably pronounce the letters ‘N' and ‘Ñ' in the same way.
Njemački potrošači vjerojatno izgovaraju slova N i Ñ na isti način.
GLANZ GLÄNSA 13/07/2011, T88/10, EU:T:2011:368 The GC concluded that the umlaut would not alter the overall phonetic impression for EN, ES and FR speakers, since the languages in question do not have the letter ‘ä' (para. 40).
GLANZ GLÄNSA 13/07/2011, T88/10, EU:T:2011:368 Opći sud zaključio je da prijeglas ne mijenja cjelokupni fonetski dojam za govornike engleskog, španjolskog i francuskog jer ti jezici nemaju slovo „ä” (t. 40.).
WRITE RIGHT (example only) English: highly similar aurally
WRITE RIGHT (Samo primjer) Engleski jezik: zvučno vrlo slični
Spanish: dissimilar aurally
Španjolski jezik: zvučno različiti
BAMIX KMIX 21/02/2013, T444/10, EU:T:2013:89 The GC noted that the word element ‘kmix' does not correspond to any existing word in the European Union and that it may be pronounced by part of the relevant public as it is written, as a single syllable.
BAMIX KMIX 21/02/2013, T444/10, EU:T:2013:89 Opći sud naveo je da verbalni element „kmix” ne odgovara nijednoj postojećoj riječi u Europskoj uniji i stoga ga dio relevantne javnosti može izgovarati onako kako je napisan, tj. kao jedan slog.
However, it also considered it possible that the mark applied for would be pronounced as a two-syllable word, namely ‘ka' and ‘mix'.
Međutim, smatrao je i da je moguće da će se prijavljeni žig izgovarati kao riječ od dva sloga, tj. „ka” i „mix”.
In certain languages of the European Union (in particular French and German), the letter ‘k' is pronounced as ‘ka' and the pronunciation ‘km' is not usual (para. 32).
U određenim jezicima Europske unije (posebno u francuskom i njemačkom) slovo „k” izgovara se „ka”, a izgovor „km” nije uobičajen (t. 32.).
‘Hellim' is the Turkish translation of ‘Halloumi' (Greek) (a type of cheese).
„Hellim” je turski prijevod grčke riječi „Halloumi” (vrsta sira).
The relevant territory was Cyprus.
Relevantno je područje Cipar.
The Court held that while Turkish is not an official language of the EU, it is one of the official languages of the Republic of Cyprus.
Sud je utvrdio da je turski jedan od službenih jezika Republike Cipar iako nije službeni jezik EU-a.
Therefore, Turkish is understood and spoken by part of the population of Cyprus (para. 38).
Stoga dio stanovništva Cipra razumije turski i koristi se turskim jezikom (t. 38.).
Therefore, the Court found that the average consumer in Cyprus, where both Greek and Turkish are official languages, will understand that the words HALLOUMI or HELLIM both refer to the same specialty cheese from Cyprus.
Stoga je Sud utvrdio da prosječni potrošač na Cipru, gdje su grčki i turski službeni jezici, razumije da se riječi HALLOUMI ili HELLIM obje odnose na isti sir koji je specijalitet na Cipru.
Consequently, there is some conceptual similarity between these words (para. 41).
Uslijed toga, postoji konceptualna sličnost između tih riječi (t. 41.).
Sign Territory Concept Case No
Znak Područje Koncept Predmet br.
Mirto ES [in EN: myrtle] in Spanish describes a shrub of the family Myrtaceae, two to three metres high.
Mirto ES [na engleskom: myrtle (mirta)] na španjolskom označuje dva do tri metra visok grm obitelji Myrtaceae.
Storm EN Bad weather T30/09
Storm EN Loše vrijeme T30/09
--- STAR SNACKS EU The terms ‘star snacks' and ‘star foods' will be understood as referring to quality food not only by English speakers, but also by most of the relevant public.
--- STAR SNACKS EU Pojmove „star snacks” i „star foods” u smislu kvalitetne hrane razumiju govornici engleskog jezika, ali i većina relevantne javnosti.