natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, the elements added, such as, ‘bio', ‘luxe', ‘mineral passion' or ‘spa world chocolate', are descriptive of the characteristics of the goods.
Nadalje, dodani elementi, kao što su „bio”, „luxe”, „mineral passion” ili „spa world chocolate” opisuju svojstva proizvoda.
The element ‘bio' may easily be perceived as an abbreviation of the term ‘biological' and refers to the origin or composition of the goods concerned.
Element „bio” može se lako shvatiti kao kratica pojma „biološki” i odnosi se na podrijetlo ili sastav predmetnih proizvoda.
The term ‘mineral' describes the components of the goods in question as minerals are commonly used in cosmetics.
Izraz „mineral” opisuje sastavnice predmetnih proizvoda jer se minerali često upotrebljavaju u kozmetici.
In addition, the word ‘spa' has a particular meaning with regard to health and wellness establishments.
Osim toga, riječ „spa” ima posebno značenje u odnosu na zdravstvene centre za opuštanje i njegu tijela.
Finally, the word ‘luxe' is intended to describe the range of goods in question.
Konačno, svrha riječi „luxe” jest opisati raspon predmetnih proizvoda.
Consequently, such additional elements do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (paras 30-32).
Slijedom toga, takvi dodatni elementi ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga (t. 30. - 32.).
The use of the earlier mark ‘PELASPAN-PAC' without the hyphen connecting the elements ‘PELASPAN' and ‘PAC' does not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered and therefore counts for the genuine use assessment.
Uporaba ranijeg žiga „PELASPAN-PAC” bez spojnice koja spaja elemente „PELASPAN” i „PAC” ne mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga kako je registriran te se stoga smatra važnom za procjenu stvarne uporabe.
‘In the case in hand, and after an examination of the proof submitted, which focuses essentially on the Spanish market, the Board is of the opinion that use of the “TENTATION” registered trade mark through use of the “TENTATIONS” sign does not alter the distinctive character of the original registered trade mark.
„U ovom slučaju i nakon ispitivanja podnesenog dokaza, koji se uglavnom odnosi na španjolsko tržište, vijeće smatra da uporaba registriranog žiga „TENTATION” kroz uporabu znaka „TENTATIONS” ne mijenja razlikovni karakter izvornog registriranog žiga.
Specifically, the mere addition of the letter “S” to the end of the trade mark does not substantially alter the visual appearance or pronunciation of the registered trade mark and does not create a different conceptual impression on the Spanish market either.
Naime, samo dodavanje slova ,S' na kraju žiga ne mijenja bitno vizualni izgled ili izgovor registriranog žiga niti na španjolskom tržištu stvara drugačiji konceptualni dojam.
The trade mark in question will be perceived merely as being in its plural form as opposed to its singular form.
Predmetni žig doživljava se samo kao oblik u množini umjesto u jednini.
Therefore, said change does not alter the distinctive character of the sign' (para. 17).
Prema tome, ta izmjena ne mijenja razlikovni karakter znaka” (t. 17.).
‘… these signs are not, as the applicant seems to suggest, significant alterations of the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered' (para. 24).
„[...] ti znakovi ne predstavljaju značajne izmjene razlikovnog karaktera ranije registriranog žiga, što podnositelj prijave nastoji dokazati” (t. 24.).
‘… whereas the German word “Feriendorf”, meaning “holiday village”, could be perceived as descriptive of the relevant [hotel] services, the same was not true for the word element “panno[n]ia”' (para. 30).
„[...] iako se njemačka riječ „Feriendorf”, što znači „turističko naselje”, može smatrati opisnom za relevantne [hotelske] usluge, isto ne vrijedi za verbalni element „panno[n]ia” (t. 30.).
Consequently, the addition of the word ‘panno[n]ia' alters the distinctive character of the mark.
Slijedom toga, dodavanje riječi „panno[n]ia” mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga.
‘It cannot be considered … that the use of CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE constitutes use of the mark CAPTAIN in a form which does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as registered, since the two signs appear essentially different' (para. 20).
„CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE [...] nije moguće tumačiti kao uporabu žiga CAPTAIN u obliku koji ne mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga kako je registriran zbog toga što se ta dva znaka doimaju bitno različitima” (t. 20.).
The addition of the semi-circular graphical element does not change the overall impression of the sign (para. 49).
Dodavanje polukružnog grafičkog elementa ne mijenja ukupni dojam znaka (t. 49.).
The figurative elements are only decorative or even negligible and do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (para. 43).
Figurativni elementi samo su dekorativni ili čak zanemarivi i ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga (t. 43.).
‘[T]his material shows that the respondent's products also contain other elements, in particular a Japanese character within a small circle, which is depicted either above or below the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 19).
„[O]vaj materijal pokazuje da proizvodi tuženika sadržavaju i neke druge elemente, konkretno japanski znak u malom krugu koji je prikazan ispod ili iznad riječi ,BIONSEN'” (t. 19.).
‘However, in the present case, the combination of the stylised form of the word “BIONSEN” and the Japanese character, independently of whether it is above or under the word “BIONSEN”, constitutes at the most use which differs from the form in which it was registered only in negligible elements.
„Ipak, u ovom slučaju, kombinacija stiliziranog oblika riječi ,BIONSEN' i japanskog znaka, neovisno o tome nalazi li se on iznad ili ispod riječi ,BIONSEN', može se smatrati samo uporabom koja se od oblika u kojemu je žig registriran razlikuje samo u zanemarivim elementima.
The word “BIONSEN” as used is merely a slight and banal stylisation of the word ‘BIONSEN'.
Riječ ,BIONSEN', kako se upotrebljava, predstavlja samo beznačajnu i običnu stilizaciju riječi ,BIONSEN'.
As to the addition of the figurative element in the form of a circular element with a Japanese character, this will hardly be noticed by the average consumer due to its relatively small size and position, either under or on the right side above the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 23).
Kada je riječ o dodavanju figurativnog elementa u obliku kružnog elementa s japanskim znakom, teško da će ga prosječni potrošač primijetiti zbog njegove relativno male veličine i položaja, ispod ili na desnoj strani iznad riječi ,BIONSEN'” (t. 23.).
The General Court considered that both the registered form of the earlier mark and the form used included the word ‘BUS' and the figurative element of ‘three interlaced triangles'.
Opći sud smatrao je da registrirani oblik ranijeg žiga i upotrijebljeni oblik uključuju riječ „BUS” i figurativni element „tri isprepletena trokuta”.
The presentation of the elements is not particularly original or unusual in either form.
Prikaz tih elemenata ni u jednom obliku nije osobito originalan ili neobičan.
The variation in them does not affect the distinctive character of the trade mark.
Različite varijante elemenata ne utječu na razlikovni karakter žiga.
As regards the omission of ‘Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e.
U pogledu izostavljanja „Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e.
V.', the latter was ‘a string of words, written in small characters and occupying a secondary position, at the bottom of the sign.
V.”, potonji se element sastojao od „niza riječi napisanih malim slovima koja zauzimaju sekundarni položaj na dnu znaka.
Its meaning (Association for the assistance of businessmen and the self-employed, registered association) refers to the services in question.
Njegovo značenje (Udruženje za pomoć poduzetnicima i samozaposlenima, registrirano udruženje) odnosi se na predmetne usluge.
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; confirmed 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; potvrđeno 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484
The Board considered that although in some pieces of evidence the earlier mark did not include the word ‘beachwear', this did not alter the distinctiveness of the earlier mark because it was plainly descriptive of the nature of the goods (t-shirts, beachwear).
Vijeće je smatralo da, iako u nekim dokazima raniji žig nije uključivao riječ „beachwear”, to ne mijenja razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga zbog toga što ona očito opisuje narav proizvoda (majice kratkih rukava, odjeća za plažu).
The General Court held: ‘In the present case, the earlier mark is a composite mark, representing a ship's wheel, that is to say, a sign with a rounded shape.
Opći sud smatrao je sljedeće: „Raniji žig u ovom je slučaju složeni žig koji predstavlja kormilo, odnosno riječ je o znaku zaobljenog oblika.
In the centre of the sign there is a fish skeleton, at the top of which is written the term “fishbone”, and at the bottom the term “beachwear”.
U sredini znaka nalazi se kostur ribe na čijem je vrhu napisan izraz ,fishbone', a na dnu izraz ,beachwear'.
The term “beachwear”, which means “beach clothing” in English, is descriptive of the nature of the goods covered by the earlier mark [emphasis added].
Izraz ,beachwear', koji na engleskom jeziku znači ,odjeća za plažu', opisuje narav proizvoda obuhvaćenih ranijim žigom [isticanje naknadno dodano].
That descriptive character is obvious in the case of the “beach clothing” covered by the earlier mark, but also in the case of “t-shirts”, for which the term “beachwear” will immediately be perceived as meaning that it refers to a t-shirt to be worn in casual situations, for example, on the beach in summer.
Taj je opisni karakter očigledan u slučaju elementa ,odjeća za plažu' koji je obuhvaćen ranijim žigom, ali i u slučaju elementa ,majica kratkih rukava' u kojem se izraz ,beachwear' odmah doživljava kao majica koja se nosi u ležernim situacijama, na primjer ljeti na plaži.
Consumers will thus understand that term as designating the type of goods and will not perceive it as an indication of their commercial origin.
Prema tome, potrošači taj izraz razumiju kao vrstu proizvoda i ne percipiraju ga kao oznaku njegova komercijalnog podrijetla.
The fact that the term “beachwear” is written in a more fanciful font than that of the term “fishbone”, which is written in ordinary capital letters, cannot alter such an assessment.
Činjenica da je izraz ,beachwear' pisan maštovitijom vrstom slova nego izraz ,fishbone', koji je pisan običnim velikim slovima, ne može promijeniti takvu procjenu.
Furthermore, … the font of the term “beachwear” cannot be regarded as uncommon, since it comprises printed lower-case characters.
Osim toga, [...] vrsta slova izraza ,beachwear' ne može se smatrati nesvakidašnjom zbog toga što se on sastoji od malih pisanih slova.
As for the horizontal position of the term “beachwear” in the earlier mark, which runs in a perpendicular sense across the bottom of a ship's wheel, it is no more graphically incisive than that of the term “fishbone” which, also written horizontally, follows the rounded shape of that wheel' (paras 6263).
Kada je riječ o vodoravnom položaju izraza ,beachwear' na ranijem žigu, koji se proteže okomito po dnu brodskog kormila, on nije grafički precizniji od izraza ,fishbone' koji, također pisan vodoravno, prati zaobljeni oblik tog kormila (t. 62.63.).
It is not considered that the absence of the word ‘de' affects the distinctive character of the trade mark.
Ne smatra se da izostavljanje riječi „de” utječe na razlikovni karakter žiga.
The Court confirmed (para. 53) the finding of the Board that the ‘distinctiveness of the mark is largely dominated by the wording ‘LIDL MUSIC' and only marginally influenced by the figurative elements used to represent the letters and the small monogram underneath' (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19).
Sud je potvrdio (t. 53.) zaključak žalbenog vijeća da „razlikovnošću ranijeg žiga znatno dominira formulacija ‚LIDL MUSIC' i samo je marginalno pod utjecajem figurativnih elemenata koji se upotrebljavaju za predstavljanje slova i malog monograma ispod” (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19.).
The omission of the transliteration of the term in Greek characters does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as the form used contains the term APALIA, which is distinctive and dominant.
Izostavljanje transliteracije izraza pisanog grčkim slovima ne mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga zbog toga što upotrijebljeni oblik sadržava pojam APALIA koji je razlikovan i dominantan.
‘[T]he absence of the word element ‘TONY' in the first two marks significantly alters the distinctive character of the registered earlier mark ‘TONY HAWK'.
„[I]zostavljanje verbalnog elementa ,TONY' u prva dva žiga značajno mijenja razlikovni karakter registriranog ranijeg žiga ,TONY HAWK'.
Therefore, these marks shall be perceived as separate marks and their use cannot be considered as the use of the word mark ‘TONY HAWK'.
Prema tome, te žigove treba smatrati zasebnim žigovima, a njihova se uporaba ne može smatrati uporabom verbalnog žiga ,TONY HAWK'.”
(in Spain) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); appeal 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 did not refer to the Spanish trade marks)
(u Španjolskoj) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); žalba 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 nije se odnosila na španjolske žigove)
‘The earlier trade mark is registered as “SP LA SPOSA”.
„Raniji žig registriran je kao ,SP LA SPOSA'.
The documents submitted as proof of use refer only to female wedding dresses.
Dokumenti koji su podneseni kao dokaz o uporabi odnose se samo na ženske vjenčanice.
The element “LA SPOSA” is a common term, which will be understood by the Italian and Spanish public as “the bride” and has a weak distinctive character for the goods in issue, namely wedding dresses.
Element ,LA SPOSA' uobičajeni je naziv koji će talijanska i španjolska javnost razumjeti kao ,nevjesta' i on ima slab razlikovni karakter u pogledu predmetnih proizvoda, odnosno vjenčanica.
The opponent itself, in its price list “tarifa de precios” which is drafted in various official languages of the EC, translated this term into the respective languages; underneath the term “LA SPOSA”, the terms “novia” are mentioned in the Portuguese version of the list, “bride” in the English version, “Braut” in the German version, and so on.
Sam podnositelj prigovora u svojem je cjeniku ,tarifa de precios', koji je izrađen na raznim službenim jezicima Europske zajednice, taj izraz preveo na predmetne jezike, pri čemu se u portugalskoj verziji troškovnika ispod izraza ,LA SPOSA' spominje izraz ,novia', u engleskoj verziji ,bride', u njemačkoj verziji ‚Braut' i tako dalje.
This shows that even the respondent itself understands the term “LA SPOSA” as a reference to the consumer targeted, namely the bride' (para. 18).
To pokazuje da čak i sam tuženik izraz ,LA SPOSA' shvaća kao upućivanje na ciljanog potrošača, odnosno nevjestu” (t. 18.).
‘Therefore the element “SP” at the beginning of the earlier mark is a distinctive element and cannot be disregarded.
„Prema tome, element ,SP' na početku ranijeg žiga predstavlja razlikovni element koji se ne može ignorirati.
This element cannot be neglected, first and foremost as it is placed at the beginning of the mark.
Taj se element ne može zanemariti, prvenstveno zato što se nalazi na početku žiga.
Also, it is meaningless and distinctive on its own, in all the languages of the European Union' (para. 19).
Osim toga, on nema značenje i razlikovan je sam po sebi, na svim jezicima Europske unije” (t. 19.).
‘[T]he omission of the letter “SP” in the word “LA SPOSA” or “LA SPOSA COLLECTION” is not an acceptable variation of the earlier mark but a significant modification to the distinctive character of the mark.
„[I]zostavljanje slova ,SP' u riječima ,LA SPOSA' ili ,LA SPOSA COLLECTION' nije prihvatljiva varijanta ranijeg žiga, već značajna izmjena razlikovnog karaktera žiga.
The documents submitted by the respondent are insufficient to prove that the mark “SP LA SPOSA” has been put to genuine use' (para. 26).
Dokumenti koje je podnio tuženik nisu dostatni za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe žiga ,SP LA SPOSA'” (t. 26.).
In this case the Court examined whether the omission, in the form as used, of the expression ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' alters the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered.
U tom je predmetu Sud ispitivao mijenja li izostavljanje izraza „La Sabiduría del Sabor”, u obliku u kojem se žig upotrebljava, razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga kako je registriran.
Firstly, the words 'Sabores de Navarra' (tastes/flavours of Navarra) refer to sensations or impressions evoking a region of northern Spain.
Prvo, riječi „Sabores de Navarra” (okusi Navarre) odnose se na osjećaje ili dojmove koji u misli dozivaju regiju u sjevernoj Španjolskoj.
Thus, the elements can be perceived by the Spanish-speaking public as descriptive of the geographical origin of the goods in question.
Stoga javnost sa španjolskog govornog područja može doživjeti elemente kao opisne u pogledu zemljopisnog podrijetla predmetnih proizvoda.
Moreover, the word ‘sabores' (favours) may be perceived as an indication of product quality, i.e. flavour.
Osim toga, riječ „sabores” (okusi) može se doživjeti kao oznaka kvalitete proizvoda, tj. okusa.
It follows that the elements ‘Sabores de Navarra' must be regarded as essentially descriptive.
Iz toga proizlazi da se elementi „Sabores de Navarra” u suštini moraju smatrati opisnima.
The elements ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor', given the meaning of the word ‘La Sabiduría' (wisdom) and the word ‘sabor' (flavour), constitutes a play of words and cannot be considered descriptive.
Elementi „La Sabiduría del Sabor”, s obzirom na značenje riječi „Sabiduría” (mudrost) i „sabor” (okus) predstavljaju igru riječi i ne mogu se smatrati opisnima.
It follows that the distinctiveness of the earlier mark comes essentially from the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor'.
Iz toga slijedi da razlikovnost ranijih žigova u suštini proizlazi iz riječi „La Sabiduría del Sabor”.
The Court found that in the present case, the omission of the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' in the form used alters the distinctive character of the mark (paras 31-45).
Sud je utvrdio da u tom predmetu izostavljanje riječi „La Sabiduría del Sabor” u obliku u kojem se žig upotrebljava mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga (t. 31. - 45.).
‘The earlier trade marks are strongly characterised by the presence of the figurative element.
„Figurativni elementi značajni su u ranijim žigovima.
However, the documents submitted during the opposition proceedings and, even if they were to be taken into account, the appeal proceedings, do not show any use of the figurative element contained in the earlier trade marks' (para. 19).
Međutim, dokumentima koji su podneseni tijekom postupka prigovora, čak i da su uzeti u obzir tijekom žalbenog postupka, ne bi se pokazala nikakva uporaba figurativnog elementa u ranijim žigovima” (t. 19.).
The Court confirmed that the use of a [standard] typeface does not alter the distinctive character of a word mark.
Sud je potvrdio da uporaba [standardnog] oblika slova ne mijenja razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga.
It rather helps to distinguish the mark from the descriptive elements ‘ron' and ‘de Cuba' (para. 34).
Umjesto toga pomoć je u razlikovanju žiga od opisnih elemenata „ron” i „de Cuba” (t. 34.).
The Board confirmed OD's views that use of the word mark ‘MILENARIO' written in stylised bold characters did not affect the distinctive character of the mark, as the word ‘MILENARIO' was considered to be the dominant element of the mark registered for sparkly wines and liquors in Class 33 (para. 13).
Vijeće je potvrdilo mišljenje Odjela za prigovore da uporaba verbalnog žiga „MILENARIO”, pisanog stiliziranim podebljanim slovima, nije utjecala na razlikovni karakter žiga zbog toga što se smatralo da je riječ „MILENARIO” dominantni element žiga koji je registriran za pjenušava vina i likere u razredu 33. (t. 13.).
Representation of the word mark, registered for pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations; plasters; materials for dressings; fungicides; disinfectants covered by the earlier trade mark in Class 5, in a stylised form together with figurative elements was not considered as substantially changing the distinctive character of the word trade mark ‘AMYCOR' as registered.
Smatra se da prikaz verbalnog žiga koji je registriran za farmaceutske i higijenske pripravke; flastere; materijale za previjanje; fungicide; dezinfekcijska sredstva koji su obuhvaćeni ranijim žigom iz razreda 5., pri čemu je znak prikazan u stiliziranom obliku zajedno s figurativnim elementima, ne mijenja značajno razlikovni karakter verbalnog žiga „AMYCOR” kako je registriran.
‘The applicant's argument that the proof of use is insufficient because it refers to the device mark … and not to the word mark ‘THE ECONOMIST' fails.
„Obrazloženje podnositelja prijave da je dokaz o uporabi nedostatan zbog toga što se odnosi na logotip [...], a ne na verbalni žig ‚THE ECONOMIST', nije prihvaćen.
First, the submitted evidence refers to both earlier marks (i.e. the word mark and the device mark).
Prvo, podneseni dokaz odnosi se na oba ranija žiga (odnosno na verbalni žig i logotip).
Furthermore, use of the earlier device mark constitutes use of the earlier word mark.
Osim toga, uporaba ranijeg logotipa predstavlja uporabu ranijeg verbalnog žiga.
In this respect it should be noted that word marks are considered used as registered, also if the typeface is different (this may be different if the typeface is a very particular one), if there is a usual change in the letter size or a usual change between lower-case and capital letters, if used in a specific colour or if used in combination with generic additions.
U tom pogledu treba napomenuti da se smatra da su verbalni žigovi u uporabi u obliku u kojem su registrirani, čak i ako je oblik slova drukčiji (to može biti drukčije ako se upotrebljava vrlo poseban oblik slova), ako je riječ o uobičajenoj promjeni veličine slova ili uobičajenom izmjenjivanju malih i velikih slova, ako se oni upotrebljavaju u određenoj boji ili ako se upotrebljavaju u kombinaciji s generičkim dodavanjima.
Use of the word “THE ECONOMIST” in a standard typeface, with the usual use of capitals at the beginning of the words “The” and “Economist”, in a white colour on a contrasting background is considered use, not only of the earlier device mark but of the earlier word mark as well' (para. 14).
Uporaba riječi ‚THE ECONOMIST' u standardnom obliku slova, uz uobičajenu uporabu velikih slova na početku riječi ‚The' i ‚Economist' pisanih bijelom bojom na kontrastnoj pozadini smatra se uporabom ne samo ranijeg logotipa, već i ranijeg verbalnog žiga” (t. 14.).
BIOTEX (various) 02/10/2001, R 812/20001 BIO TEK (fig.) / BIOTEX
BIOTEX (razna) 02/10/2001, R 812/20001 BIO TEK (fig.) / BIOTEX
‘The mark, as shown in those documents, has been variously depicted in the following styles: - The word BIOTEX in white block capitals on a dark background in advertisements.
„Dokaz o uporabi pokazuje da je žig, unatoč različitim stilskim promjenama, u biti ostao ,BIOTEX'.
- The word BIOTEX in white block capitals with the top-most point of the letter ‘I' in darker colouring.
Slova sadržana u žigu općenito su velika slova koja ne sadrže ništa neobično.
- The word BIOTEX in plain block white capitals on the labels and packaging of detergent products.
Velika su slova ponekad obična i dvodimenzionalna, a ponekad osjenčana kako bi ostavila dojam trodimenzionalnosti.
- The word BIOTEX in plain typeface on shipping invoices.
Ponekad slovo ,i' ima drukčiju boju na vrhu.
Sometimes the letter “I” has a different colour tip.
Registrirani oblik Stvarna uporaba Broj predmeta
This does not automatically mean that the mark was not used as registered.
To ne znači automatski da žig nije bio u uporabi u obliku u kojemu je registriran.
Each case must be looked at on its own merits.
Svaki slučaj treba razmotriti samostalno.
In this case, the Office finds that the mark SILVER is the actual trade mark.
Ured u ovom slučaju utvrđuje da je žig ,SILVER' stvarni žig.