natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the light of the foregoing the conclusions set out in recitals (153) to (158) to the provisional Regulation, i.e. that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, are confirmed.
Na temelju navedenog potvrđuju se zaključi iz uvodnih izjava (153) do (158) Privremene uredbe, tj. da je industrija Unije pretrpjela materijalnu štetu u smislu članka 3. stavka 5. Osnovne uredbe.
After the provisional disclosure, several interested parties claimed that the causation analysis conducted did not separate, distinguish and quantify the injurious effects of the dumped imports from the effects of other known factors which at the same time are injuring the Union industry.
Nakon privremene objave nekoliko zainteresiranih strana tvrdilo je da u analizi uzročnosti štetni učinci dampinškog uvoza nisu odvojeni, prepoznati i kvantificirani u odnosu na ostale poznate čimbenike koji istodobno nanose štetu industriji Unije.
Moreover, it was claimed that the Commission failed to undertake a collective analysis of these other known factors.
Nadalje, tvrdi se da Komisija nije provela zajedničku analizu ostalih poznatih čimbenika.
In reply to this claim it should be noted that the Commission, as per established practice, first examined whether there is a causal link between the dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry and secondly examined whether any of the other known factors had broken the causal link established between the material injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports.
U odgovoru na tu tvrdnju potrebno je napomenuti da je Komisija, prema ustaljenoj praksi, prvo ispitala postoji li uzročno-posljedična veza između dampinškog uvoza i štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije, a zatim je li neki od ostalih poznatih čimbenika prekinuo uzročno-posljedičnu vezu između materijalne štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije i dampinškog uvoza.
In this analysis, the effects of the other known factors on the situation of the Union industry were assessed, distinguished and separated from the injurious effects of the dumped imports to ensure that injuries caused by these factors were not attributed to the dumped imports.
U okviru te analize ocijenjeni su učinci ostalih poznatih čimbenika na stanje industrije Unije te su prepoznati i odvojeni od štetnih učinaka dampinškog uvoza kako bi se osiguralo da se šteta koju su prouzročili ti čimbenici ne pripisuje dampinškom uvozu.
It was found that none of them had a significant impact, if any, on the situation of the industry that could reverse the fact that the material injury assessed must be attributed to the dumped imports.
Utvrđeno je da je učinak bilo kojeg od navedenih čimbenika na stanje industrije bio malen ili nikakav te da nije mogao osporiti činjenicu da se utvrđena materijalna šteta mora pripisati dampinškom uvozu.
On these grounds the argument was dismissed.
Na temelju toga tvrdnja je odbačena.
Following the final disclosure, several interested parties reiterated the above arguments.
Nakon konačne objave nekoliko zainteresiranih stranaka ponovilo je navedene tvrdnje.
In this regard it was claimed that the Commission should establish explicitly, through a reasoned and adequate explanation, that the injury caused by factors other than the dumped imports is not attributed to these imports.
S tim u vezi tvrdili su da bi Komisija odgovarajućim i utemeljenim objašnjenjem trebala izričito potvrditi da se šteta koju su prouzročili čimbenici koji nisu dampinški uvoz ne može pripisati tom uvozu.
In this investigation, it was concluded, after examining all the facts, that the dumped imports taken in isolation have caused material injury to the Union industry.
U ovom je ispitnom postupku, nakon ispitivanja svih činjenica, zaključeno da je dampinški uvoz, analiziran zasebno, prouzročio materijalnu štetu industriji Unije.
In this respect, quantifying the effects of other known factors was not possible and therefore a qualitative assessment was carried out as set out in recitals (164) to (222) to the provisional Regulation.
U tom smislu nije bilo moguće kvantitativno odrediti posljedice ostalih čimbenika pa je provedena kvalitativna analiza, kao što se navodi u uvodnim izjavama (164) do (222) Privremene uredbe.
In conclusion, it was confirmed that the material injury of the Union industry was caused by the dumped imports.
U zaključku je potvrđeno da je dampinški uvoz uzrok materijalne štete industriji Unije.
Indeed the effects of other factors on the Union's industry's negative development were considered to be limited.
Učinci ostalih čimbenika na negativni razvoj industrije Unije smatraju se ograničenima.
It should be noted that, under Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, no obligation is imposed as to the form of the attribution and non attribution analyses which should be carried out.
Potrebno je napomenuti da prema članku 3. stavcima 6. i 7. Osnovne uredbe ne postoji obveza upotrebe određenog oblika analize radi pripisivanja ili nepripisivanja uzroka.
On the contrary, under Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, those analyses must be carried out in such a way as to enable the injurious effects of the dumped imports to be separated and distinguished from the injurious effects caused by other factors.
Baš nasuprot, prema članku 3. stavcima 6. i 7. Osnovne uredbe, te se analize moraju provesti na način kojim se omogućuje prepoznavanje i odvajanje štetnih učinaka dampinškog uvoza od štetnih učinaka drugih čimbenika.
The investigation did not reveal any evidence that all other known factors which may have contributed to the injury suffered, together or in isolation, broke the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
U ispitnom postupku nisu pronađeni dokazi da su ostali poznati čimbenici koji su mogli pridonijeti nastanku štete, zajedno ili odvojeno, prekinuli uzročno-posljedičnu vezu između dampinškog uvoza i štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije.
Given the above analysis, it was confirmed that other known factors were not such as to reverse the finding that the material injury suffered by the Union industry must be attributed to the dumped imports.
Uzimajući u obzir navedenu analizu, potvrđeno je da ostali poznati čimbenici nisu mogli osporiti nalaz da se materijalna šteta koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije mora pripisati dampinškom uvozu.
On these grounds these arguments were dismissed.
Na temelju toga te su tvrdnje odbačene.
After the provisional disclosure some interested parties objected to the finding in recital (160) to the provisional Regulation.
Nakon privremene objave nekoliko zainteresiranih stranaka osporilo je nalaz u uvodnoj izjavi (160) Privremene uredbe.
They reiterated that market conditions of the product under investigation differ per Member State and that therefore the causation analysis should be made at the level of each Member State separately.
Ponovili su da se tržišni uvjeti proizvoda koji se istražuje razlikuju od jedne do druge države članice pa bi se stoga analiza uzročnosti trebala provesti za svaku državu članicu zasebno.
In addition, these parties argued that the national support schemes, the sun exposure and the electricity prices (including regulatory charges) differ per Member State and that furthermore there are different market segments in each market (the residential- installations of less than 40 kW, commercial and industrial- installations between 40 kW and 1MW and the utility market segment- installations between 1 MW and 10 MW).
Osim toga, te su stranke tvrdile da se nacionalni programi potpore, uvjeti osunčanja i cijene električne energije (uključujući regulatorne naknade) razlikuju od jedne do druge države članice i da nadalje na svakom tržištu postoje različiti tržišni segmenti (stambeni – instalacije slabije od 40 kW, komercijalni i industrijski – instalacije između 40 kW i 1MW te tržišni segment javnih usluga – instalacije između 1 MW i 10 MW).
In view of this they claimed that the causation analysis should be conducted separately for each Member State on the one hand and for the large-scale and the residential segments on the other hand.
S obzirom na to tvrdili su da analizu uzročnosti treba provesti odvojeno za svaku državu članicu, kao i za stambeni segment i segment velikih instalacija.
After the final disclosure some interested parties reiterated their claim that the causation analysis should be conducted on a per Member State basis, without however providing further arguments or new evidence in this respect.
Nakon konačne objave određene zainteresirane stranke ponovile su tvrdnju da analizu uzročnosti treba provesti zasebno za svaku državu članicu, iako u vezi s tim nisu dostavile dodatne argumente ili nove dokaze.
The investigation has shown that sales and import prices are similar across the Union.
Ispitnim postupkom dokazano je da su prodajne i uvozne cijene slične po cijeloj Uniji.
It can therefore be considered that there is indeed one market for the product under investigation.
Stoga se može smatrati da doista postoji jedno tržište za proizvod koji se istražuje.
The investigation did also not reveal that producers in each Member State or region concentrated their activities in this specific market or that the dumped imports concentrated in one Member State or region.
Ispitnim postupkom nije dokazano ni da su proizvođači u svakoj državi članici ili regiji svoje djelatnosti koncentrirali na tom posebnom tržištu ili da je dampinški uvoz koncentriran u jednoj državi članici ili regiji.
Moreover, none of the interested parties argued that dumping and injury should be analysed on a per Member States basis which would however be a pre-condition for conducting a separate causation analysis per Member State.
Štoviše, nijedna zainteresirana stranaka nije tvrdila da damping i štetu treba analizirati za svaku državu članicu zasebno, što je preduvjet za provedbu zasebne analize uzročnosti za svaku državu članicu.
The investigation did not reveal any evidence that this would have been an appropriate approach, in particular given that there were similar prices across the Union of the product under consideration at Union level.
U ispitnom postupku nije se pokazalo da bi taj pristup bio primjeren, osobito uzimajući u obzir činjenicu da su cijene proizvoda iz ispitnog postupka, razmatranog na razini Unije, bile slične posvuda u Uniji.
Moreover, it is noted that the sun exposure can be different in different regions of the same Member States, e.g. Southern France has more sun exposure than Northern France, or different regions within one Member State can have different support schemes (e.g. Belgium) and that therefore the impact of these factors on the demand may vary from one region to another within the same Member State.
Osim toga, napominje se da se uvjeti osunčanja mogu razlikovati u različitim područjima iste države članice, na primjer, jug Francuske ima bolje uvjete osunčanja od njezina sjevera ili da se u različitim područjima u jednoj državi članici mogu primjenjivati različiti programi potpore (na primjer, Belgija) te da stoga učinak tih čimbenika na potražnju može varirati od područja do područja u istoj državi članici.
However, the differences in the regulatory framework of each Member State and/or region and the differences in conditions such as sun exposure do not warrant a separate causation analysis, and thus separate injury and dumping analysis.
Međutim, razlike među regulatornim okvirima država članica i/ili regija te razlike u uvjetima, poput uvjeta osunčanja, ne opravdavaju zasebnu analizu uzročnosti, a time i zasebnu analizu dampinga i štete.
Therefore, these arguments had to be rejected.
Stoga su ti argumenti morali biti odbačeni.
Another interested party argued that while other factors are relevant, the national support schemes remain the main factor in determining the demand.
Druga zainteresirana stranka tvrdila je da su nacionalni programi potpore, bez obzira na važnost drugih čimbenika, glavni čimbenik koji određuje potražnju.
The same party also contested that grid parity was already reached in some locations arguing that prices of modules increased since the IP while electricity prices decreased.
Ta je stranka osporila i da je na nekim lokacijama već ostvaren paritet mreže tvrdeći da su od RIP-a cijene modula porasle, a cijene električne energije pale.
It further argued that, in any event, at least in certain Member States, the regulatory, economic and technical conditions do not allow for the connection to the grid and for those Member States it was therefore irrelevant whether or not grid parity was reached.
Dodatno je tvrdila da u svakom slučaju u određenim državama članicama regulatorni, gospodarski i tehnički uvjeti ne dopuštaju priključivanje na mrežu pa je za te države članice nebitno je li paritet mreže ostvaren ili nije.
This party however did not provide any supporting evidence for the above allegations.
Međutim, ta stranka nije dostavila nikakve dokaze kojima bi te navode potkrijepila.
In any event the above arguments confirm that the situation with regard to national support schemes as well as grid parity may be different to a certain extent between Member States.
U svakom slučaju, navedeni argumenti potvrđuju da se okolnosti u vezi s nacionalnim programima potpore i paritetom mreže u određenoj mjeri mogu razlikovati među državama članicama.
However, none of the information submitted was of such a nature as to show that an analysis separately per Member State would be warranted.
Međutim, nijedan od dostavljenih podataka nije takve prirode da bi mogao opravdati provedbu zasebne analize za svaku državu članicu.
Following the final disclosure, the same interested party reiterated the claim and provided some information allegedly showing the different market conditions per Member State and per segment.
Nakon konačne objave jedna je zainteresirana stranka ponovila tvrdnju i dostavila određene podatke kojima se navodno pokazuju različiti tržišni uvjeti po državama članicama i po segmentu.
However, the information submitted could not be considered as conclusive as it consisted of a power point presentation without any supporting evidence, and therefore, did not show that an analysis separately per Member State would be warranted.
Međutim, dostavljeni podaci ne mogu se smatrati uvjerljivima jer je riječ o prezentaciji u programu Power point koja nije potkrijepljena dokazima pa stoga nije pokazala opravdanost zasebne analize za svaku državu članicu.
The claim of this party was therefore rejected.
Stoga su se tvrdnja te stranke morale odbaciti.
On this basis, it was concluded that an analysis of the causation per Member State and/or region and per segment would not correspond to market reality.
Na temelju toga zaključeno je da analiza uzročnosti za svaku državu članicu i/ili regiju i za svaki segment ne bi odgovarala stvarnom stanju na tržištu.
In absence of any other comment in this regard the findings made in recitals (159) and (160) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Budući da u tom pogledu nisu dostavljene dodatne primjedbe, potvrđuju se nalazi iz uvodnih izjava (159) do (160) Privremene uredbe.
The GOC claimed that the Commission has conducted the causation analysis in an inconsistent manner as the injury analysis was done separately for modules and cells, while the causation analysis did not separate between product types.
Kineska vlada tvrdila je da je Komisija nedosljedno provela analizu uzročnosti jer je analiza štete provedena odvojeno za module i ćelije, a u analizi uzročnosti nisu se zasebno razmatrale vrste proizvoda.
In this respect, it is noted that while the injury indicators were indeed shown separately for each product type, the conclusions reached for each indicator refer to the product under investigation as a whole.
S tim u vezi treba napomenuti da se zaključci dobiveni za svaki pokazatelj, iako su pokazatelji štete navedeni zasebno za svaku vrstu proizvoda, odnose na proizvod iz ispitnog postupka u cjelini.
It is also recalled that modules and cells are one single product and therefore the causation analysis was conducted on this basis.
Također se podsjeća da su moduli i ćelije jedan jedinstveni proizvod i da je stoga analiza uzročnosti provedena na toj osnovi.
One interested party contested that there was a sufficient correlation between the dumped imports of the product concerned from the PRC and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Jedna je zainteresirana stranka osporila postojanje dovoljne korelacije između dampinškog uvoza dotičnog proizvoda iz NRK-a i materijalne štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije.
It was argued that this would be supported, on the one hand, by the fact that from 2009 to 2010 the Union industry's profit margin for cells significantly increased (from loss making to 12 % profit) while Chinese imports were 36 % lower priced than Union industry's prices and doubled their market share during the same period.
Tvrdila je da tome u prilog govori činjenica da se u razdoblju 2009. – 2010. profitna marža industrije Unije za ćelije znatno povećala (od gubitka do dobiti od 12 %), dok je kineski uvoz u istom razdoblju imao cijene 36 % niže od cijena industrije Unije i podvostručio je svoj tržišni udio.
On the other hand, between 2010 and 2011 Chinese imports only gained 6 percentage points of market share, even though consumption increased much more during the same period, while the Union industry realised nonetheless a loss of 36 %.
S druge strane, u razdoblju 2010 – 2011. kineski uvoz povećao je svoje tržišni udio samo za 6 postotnih bodova iako se potrošnja tijekom istog razdoblja puno više povećala, a industrija Unije svejedno je zabilježila gubitak od 36 %.
This party argued further that as regards the IP, imports of cells from other third countries were at the same price level as Chinese imports but gained more market share corresponding to the loss of market share of the Union industry.
Ta je stranka nadalje tvrdila da je tijekom razdoblja RIP-a uvoz ćelija iz ostalih trećih zemalja, jednake razine cijene kao i kineski uvoz, povećao svoj tržišni udio za postotak koji odgovara gubitku tržišnog udjela industrije Unije.
The investigation showed that there was a constant increase of Chinese market share for all product types over the period considered (17 percentage points for modules, 17 percentage points for cells).
Ispitnim postupkom dokazano je neprestano povećanje kineskog tržišnog udjela za sve vrste proizvoda tijekom razmatranog razdoblja (17 postotnih bodova za module, 17 postotnih bodova za ćelije).
Dumped imports from the PRC increased by more than 300 % for modules and by 482 % for cells.
Dampinški uvoz iz NRK-a povećao se za više od 300 % za module i 482 % za ćelije.
At the same time there was a considerable and constant decrease of the Chinese import prices (64 % for modules and, 42 % for cells during the period considered) and in the IP they were significantly undercutting the Union industry's prices.
Istovremeno su cijene kineskog uvoza neprestano i znatno padale (64 % za module i 42 % za ćelije tijekom razmatranog razdoblja), a tijekom RIP-a znatno su snižavale cijene industrije Unije.
In parallel, the Union industry lost market share over the period considered and as described in recitals (153) and (154) to the provisional Regulation all main injury indicators showed a negative trend.
Istovremeno je industrija Unije tijekom razmatranog razdoblja izgubila tržišni udio, a kako se navodi u uvodnim izjavama (153) i (154) Privremene uredbe, svi glavni pokazatelji štete kretali su se u negativnom smjeru.
Therefore it is confirmed that there is a clear coincidence in time between the increase in dumped imports and the loss of market share of the Union industry.
Prema tome, potvrđeno je da postoji jasno vremensko poklapanje povećanja dampinškog uvoza i gubitka tržišnog udjela industrije Unije.
As shown in recitals (161) and (162) to the provisional Regulation, this correlation in time was established for all product types separately.
Kako se navodi u uvodnim izjavama (161) i (162) Privremene uredbe, ta je vremenska korelacija utvrđena zasebno za sve vrste proizvoda.
In addition, the analysis of the impact of the imports on the Union industry's profit margin separately for each year of the period considered does not lead to meaningful results as the existence of dumping and material injury as well as a causal link between them does not need to be established for each year separately.
Nadalje, zasebna analiza učinka uvoza na profitne marže industrije Unije za svaku godinu razmatranog razdoblja ne daje smislene rezultate jer se postojanje dampinga i materijalne štete i uzročno-posljedične veze između njih ne treba utvrditi zasebno za svaku godinu.
The correlation between the dumped imports and the material injury is sufficiently demonstrated when analysing the developments over the whole period considered.
Korelacija između dampinškog uvoza i materijalne štete u dovoljnoj je mjeri dokazana kada se analiziraju kretanja tijekom cijelog razmatranog razdoblja.
It is also noted that the profitability of the Union industry is one of the factors mentioned in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation which should be investigated when examining the impact of the dumped imports on the Union industry's situation.
Napominje se i da je profitabilnost industrije Unije jedan od čimbenika iz članka 3. stavka 5. Osnovne uredbe koji treba ispitati pri analizi učinka dampinškog uvoza na stanje industrije Unije.
The fact alone that the Union industry was profitable during a specific year does not necessarily mean that it did not suffer any material injury.
Sama po sebi činjenica da je industrije Unije tijekom određene godine bila profitabilna ne mora značiti da nije pretrpjela nikakvu materijalnu štetu.
Moreover, the loss of the market share of the Union industry does not need to correspond exactly to the increase of the market share of the dumped imports in order to establish a causal link between the injury and the dumped imports.
Nadalje, gubitak tržišnog udjela industrije Unije ne mora točno odgovarati povećanju tržišnog udjela dampinškog uvoza da bi se mogla utvrditi uzročno-posljedična veza između štete i dampinškog uvoza.
Finally, other factors (e.g. imports of other third countries or development of the consumption) which could have had an impact on the injurious situation of the Union industry were examined and addressed separately in recitals (164) to (224) to the provisional Regulation.
Na kraju, ispitani su i ostali čimbenici (npr. uvoz iz ostalih trećih zemalja ili kretanje potrošnje) koji su mogli utjecati na štetno stanje industrije Unije te je na njih odgovoreno zasebno u uvodnim izjavama (164) do (224) Privremene uredbe.
The coincidence in time of increasing dumped imports in significant quantities, which undercut prices of the Union industry and the increasingly precarious situation of the Union industry is a clear indicator of causation in the present case, as established in recitals (161) to (163) to the provisional Regulation.
Vremenska podudarnost znatnog količinskog povećanja dampinškog uvoza, koji je snizio cijene industrije Unije, i sve neizvjesnijeg položaja industrije Unije jasan je pokazatelj uzročnosti u ovom predmetu, kao što je utvrđeno u uvodnim izjavama (161) do (163) Privremene uredbe.
The claims with regard to the lack of any correlation between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry were therefore rejected.
Stoga su odbačene tvrdnje o nepostojanju bilo kakve korelacije između dampinškog uvoza i materijalne štete koju je pretrpjela industrija Unije.
Following the final disclosure, the same interested party continued to contest the causation analysis as the profitability of the Union industry was not analysed specifically in relation to certain years (in particular 2010), but for the whole period considered.
Nakon konačne objave ista je zainteresirana stranka i dalje osporavala analizu uzročnosti jer profitabilnost industrije Unije nije analizirana posebno za određene godine (osobito za 2010.), nego za cijelo razmatrano razdoblje.