natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those other terminals would not be equipped, for example, with a multi-layer luggage transportation system allowing baggage handling to be processed significantly faster than with their single-layer transportation systems.
Terminal, primjerice, raspolaže sustavom za prijevoz prtljage s više razina, kojim se omogućuje znatno brža otprema od sustava za prijevoz prtljage s jednom razinom, koji se nalaze na ostalim terminalima.
The Commission also mentioned that the Regional Court (Landgericht) had established that the granting of an exclusive right to easyJet was not based on any particular reason in particular in view of the fact that other airlines also serving Schönefeld handled just as many passengers and served as many routes at Schönefeld as easyJet.
Prema navodima Komisije Pokrajinski sud ustanovio je da ne postoji razlog za davanje isključivog prava na upotrebu terminala B prijevozniku easyJet. Drugi zračni prijevoznici koji su jednako tako poslovali sa Zračnom lukom Berlin-Schönefeld na Schönefeldu su otpremili jednak broj putnika i ponudili približan broj linija kao easyJet.
Besides, the Commission took the view that the […] EUR monthly rent charged by FBS to easyJet was likely to be below market price.
Osim toga, Komisija je smatrala da je zakup u iznosu od […] EUR mjesečno koji je FBS odredio za easyJet niži od zakupa u uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima.
The Commission thus took the preliminary view that the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement may confer a selective advantage on easyJet.
Komisija je stoga zauzela preliminarni stav da je Ugovor o zakupu s prijevoznikom easyJet iz 2004. predstavljao posebnu korist za easyJet.
The Commission brought forward the same arguments as for the 2003 easyJet agreement concerning the involvement of State resources in measure 4 and the imputability of this measure to the State.
U pogledu primjene državnih sredstava u Četvrtoj mjeri i pripisivanja te mjere državi Komisija je navela iste dokumente kao za Ugovor s prijevoznikom easyJet iz 2003.
Finally, the Commission raised doubts as to the compatibility of this measure with the internal market, should it qualify as State aid, notably in view of the rules laid down in the Aviation Guidelines for start-up aid to airlines.
Naposljetku, Komisija je izrazila dvojbe u pogledu spojivosti mjere s unutarnjim tržištem u slučaju da je se može svrstati u državnu potporu, posebno u odnosu na odredbe iz Smjernica za zračni promet.
According to Air France, the reduced fees charged by FBS at Schönefeld are not a general measure, as in this case the necessary publicity did not take place.
Prema navodima prijevoznika Air France snižene naknade koje je FBS naplaćivao na Schönefeldu nisu se odnosile na opću mjeru jer u tom slučaju nije izdana potrebna javna obavijest.
Furthermore, the length of the 2003 easyJet agreement (20 years) would be at odds with the Commission’s decision-making practice.
Osim toga, trajanje Ugovora s prijevoznikom easyJet iz 2003. (20 godina) u suprotnosti je s praksom odlučivanja Komisije.
Long-term financial support could not be objectively justified and no incentive effect could be demonstrated.
Za dugoročnu financijsku potporu nema objektivnog opravdanja i ne može se dokazati poticajni učinak.
As regards the use of Terminal B by easyJet, Air France took the view that this was the only terminal which was reserved exclusively for use by one airline.
Što se tiče upotrebe terminala B prijevoznika easyJet, AirFrance je smatrao da je to bio jedini terminal predviđen za isključivu upotrebu jednog zračnog prijevoznika.
The 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement would not have been subject to any tendering procedure. easyJet would be the only airline able to offer a convenient and reliable baggage delivery service at Schönefeld.
Ugovor o zakupu s prijevoznikom easyJet iz 2004. nije bio predmet poziva na podnošenje ponuda. Društvo easyJet jedini je zračni prijevoznik koji na Schönefeldu može ponuditi udobnu i pouzdanu dostavu prtljage.
Deutsche Lufthansa AG (‘Lufthansa’) pointed out in its comments that the business development of the three Berlin airports (Tegel, Schönefeld and Tempelhof) was extremely positive and the profit-sales ratio in the last three years had been around […] %.
Društvo Deutsche Lufthansa AG („Lufthansa”) u svojim je primjedbama istaknulo da se poslovanje triju berlinskih zračnih luka (Tegel, Schönefeld i Tempelhof) razvijalo izrazito pozitivno, a prinos od prodaje u posljednje je tri godine iznosio otprilike […] %.
Lufthansa took the view that Schönefeld was subsidised by the airlines operating from Tegel.
Prema mišljenju prijevoznika Lufthansa Schönefeld su subvencionirali zračni prijevoznici koji su letjeli s Tegela.
Germania Fluggesellschaft mbH (‘Germania’) took the view that the benefits provided at Schönefeld were financed by the passengers using Tegel as a result of the control and profit transfer agreement between FBS and BFG.
Trgovačko društvo Germania Fluggesellschaft mbH („Germania”) smatralo je da su koristi koje je nudio Schönefeld financirane na temelju broja putnika zračne luke Tegel u skladu s Ugovorom o kontroli i prijenosu dobiti sklopljenim između FBS-a i BFG-a.
According to Germania, the way in which the charges were calculated and the links between the companies operating Schönefeld and Tegel, which according to Germania amounts to collusion, results in cross-subsidisation.
Prema mišljenju trgovačkog društva Germania došlo je do unakrsnog financiranja proizišlog iz načina izračuna naknada i iz veza između upravitelja zračnih luka Schönefeld i Tegel, koje Germania smatra tajnim dogovorom.
Germania considers that FBS did not act in relation to the offsetting of losses as a market economy operator would have done.
Prema mišljenju prijevoznika Germania u pogledu pokrića gubitaka FBS nije postupio kao ulagač u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
Germania considers it unlikely that operations could cover FBS’ costs at Schönefeld.
Germania smatra da nije vjerojatno da su se troškovi FBS-a na Schönefeldu mogli pokriti iz poslovanja.
Germania stated that airlines at Schönefeld would receive operating aid, as a result of individual agreements on airport charges.
Trgovačko društvo Germania pozvalo se na činjenicu da su zračni prijevoznici na Schönefeldu na temelju posebnih ugovora o naknadama zračnih luka dobivali potpore za poslovanje.
Germania added that the 2004 Schedule was neither approved nor published.
Osim toga, prema mišljenju trgovačkog društva Germania, Pravilnik o naknadama iz 2004. nije bio ni odobren ni objavljen.
Germania considered that the rent charged to easyJet for the use of Terminal B was not the normal market rate.
Trgovačko društvo Germania smatralo je da iznos zakupa za upotrebu terminala B koji je naplaćen prijevozniku easyJet nije odgovarao cijeni u uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima.
This would amount to favourable treatment and State aid.
To odgovara povlaštenom položaju i državnoj potpori.
The exclusive use of the entire terminal would allow easyJet to provide a more efficient service, whereas other airlines would not have that opportunity.
Isključivim pravom na upotrebu cijelog terminala prijevozniku easyJet omogućeno je da nudi učinkovitiju uslugu, dok ostali zračni prijevoznici nisu imali tu mogućnost.
According to DBA Luftfahrtgesellschaft (‘DBA’), a low cost airline which was controlled by Air Berlin until it ceased operations in 2008, price competition on the Berlin air transport market would be particularly strong.
Prema navodima trgovačkog društva DBA Luftfahrtgesellschaft („DBA”) koje nudi povoljne letove i koje je bilo pod kontrolom trgovačkog društva Air Berlin (poslovanje prekinuto 2008.), konkurencija u pogledu cijena na berlinskom tržištu zračnog prometa bila je izuzetno jaka.
The competitive environment would had sharpened further with the implementation of the LCC Strategy at Schönefeld, particularly with the entry of Germanwings and easyJet.
Provedbom strategije za niskotarifne prijevoznike na Schönefeldu zaoštreni su uvjeti tržišnog natjecanja, posebno dolaskom društava Germanwings i easyJet.
This would put pressure on the airlines operating out of Tegel, especially the other low-cost airlines such as Air Berlin/DBA.
Na taj način izvršen je pritisak na zračne prijevoznike koji su imali odlazne letove s Tegela, među njima ponajprije na ostale niskotarifne prijevoznike kao što je Air Berlin/DBA.
DBA took the view that the rent paid by easyJet for Terminal B could not be regarded as the normal market rate.
DBA smatra da iznos zakupa za upotrebu terminala B naplaćen prijevozniku easyJet nije odgovarao cijeni u uobičajenim tržišnim uvjetima.
Moreover, the exclusive use of the baggage handling equipment in Terminal B would represent a favourable treatment and was relevant in terms of State aid legislation.
Osim toga, isključiva upotreba sustava za prijevoz prtljage na terminalu B predstavljala je povlašten položaj, što je relevantno za pravila o državnoj potpori.
Association of European Airlines
Udruga europskih zračnih prijevoznika
The Association of European Airlines (‘AEA’), which represents the interests of European network carriers, considers that cross-subsidisation between Tegel and Schönefeld, and between the AEA members operating predominantly out of Tegel and the subsidised airlines competing against them and based at Schönefeld, constituted discrimination.
Udruga europskih zračnih prijevoznika (engl. Association of European Airlines – AEA), koja zastupa interese europskih zračnih prijevoznika, smatra da je unakrsno financiranje između zračnih luka Tegel i Schönefeld te između članova AEA-a koji su ponajprije poslovali iz Tegela te subvencioniranih konkurentnih zračnih prijevoznika sa sjedištem na Schönefeldu diskriminirajuće.
According to the AEA, without this anti-competitive cross-subsidisation, the airlines operating from Schönefeld would not be economically viable and the charges at Tegel could be significantly lower.
Prema AEA-u zračni prijevoznici koji posluju na Schönefeldu bez tog unakrsnog financiranja, koje je u suprotnosti s tržišnim natjecanjem u gospodarskom smislu, ne bi opstali, a naknade na Tegelu mogle su biti znatno niže.
As Tegel was close to Schönefeld there would be no public need for the subsidies.
Zbog zemljopisne blizine Tegela Schönefeldu nije bilo javne potrebe za subvencijama.
The AEA argued in addition that the measures referred to in the opening decision were not objectively justifiable and the reductions and incentives were arbitrary and discriminatory and therefore incompatible with the Aviation Guidelines.
Osim toga, prema mišljenju AEA-a mjere navedene u odluci u pokretanju postupka objektivno nisu bile opravdane, popusti i poticaji bili su proizvoljni i diskriminirajući te stoga nisu bili u skladu sa Smjernicama za zračni promet.
Germanwings argued that FBS had behaved vis-à-vis it at all times like a private investor would have done.
Prema navodima trgovačkog društva Germanwings FBS se prema tom poduzeću redovito ponašao kao privatni ulagač.
Germanwings pointed out that in spite of the phasing out of its discounts over time, it had extended its route network from Schönefeld.
Unatoč postupnom smanjenju odobrenih popusta, Germanwings je izgradio mrežu linija koje polaze sa Schönefelda.
Germanwings stated that it it had been confident that the financial arrangements with FBS would comply with the law, especially as the three Berlin airports would form a unified airport system.
Poduzeće je vjerovalo da su financijski sporazumi sklopljeni s FBS-om u skladu sa zakonom, posebno uzevši u obzir činjenicu da su tri berlinske zračne luke činile jedinstven sustav zračnih luka.
Germanwings indicated that that it did not regard the airports of Hamburg, Dresden, Leipzig or Lübeck [30] as suitable competitive alternatives to Schönefeld because it mainly operates on German domestic routes.
Trgovačko društvo Germanwings navelo je da se zračne luke Hamburg, Dresden, Leipzig ili Lübeck [30] nisu razmatrale kao primjerene konkurentne alternative Schönefeldu s obzirom na to da taj zračni prijevoznik u prvom redu posluje na linijama unutar Njemačke.
In view of the short flight times on domestic routes, the above-mentioned airports would be too far away from Berlin to be valid substitutes for Schönefeld.
S obzirom na kratko trajanje letova na linijama unutar zemlje, navedene su zračne luke previše udaljene od Berlina da bi se mogle smatrati primjerenim alternativama Schönefeldu.
Germanwings further stated that the letting of Terminal B to easyJet was contrary to antitrust and State aid law because easyJet was not in any way involved in the financing of Terminal B and the letting took place without a corresponding tendering procedure.
Trgovačko društvo Germanwings nadalje je navelo da se davanjem terminala B u zakup prijevozniku easyJet krše pravila tržišnog natjecanja i propisi u pogledu državnih potpora s obzirom na to da easyJet ni na koji način nije sudjelovao u financiranju terminala B i da je do zakupa došlo bez odgovarajućeg poziva na podnošenje ponuda.
Moreover, the rent would be too low given that Terminal B, unlike Terminals A and C, had a modern baggage-handling facility.
Osim toga, iznos je zakupa prenizak ako se uzme u obzir činjenica da terminal B, za razliku od terminala A i C, raspolaže modernim sustavom za prihvat i otpremu prtljage.
Lübeck Airport
Zračna luka Lübeck
Lübeck Airport indicated that it had not observed any negative impact of FBS’s commercial strategy on the market.
Zračna luka Lübeck navodi da na tržištu nisu zabilježene negativne posljedice poslovne strategije FBS-a.
Ryanair took the view that with regard to short and medium-haul flights, there was no competition between the airports of Dresden, Hamburg and Lübeck on the one hand and Schönefeld on the other hand.
Trgovačko društvo Ryanair smatra da, s obzirom na letove na kratke i srednje udaljenosti, nije bilo konkurencije između zračnih luka Dresden, Hamburg i Lübeck s jedne strane i Zračne luke Schönefeld s druge strane.
The distance between Schönefeld and, respectively, Dresden, Hamburg and Lübeck would be too great for such competition to take place.
Udaljenost između Schönefelda i Dresdena, Hamburga odnosno Lübecka prevelika je da bi nastala takva konkurencija.
An agreement regarding Schönefeld would thus have no effect on the other airports mentioned.
Stoga ugovor sa Zračnom lukom Schönefeld ne bi imao posljedice za ostale navedene zračne luke.
Ryanair claims that the charges it pays at Schönefeld would be identical to those in the schedule of charges, which were in line with standard practice in the sector.
Ryanair je naveo da naknade koje je plaćao Schönefeldu odgovaraju podatcima iz pravilnika o naknadama koji su u skladu sa standardnom praksom u tom sektoru.
The agreement with FBS would be similar to those with a number of private airports and would have been concluded in the same way by a market economy investor.
Ugovor s FBS-om sličan je ugovorima sklopljenima s nizom privatnih zračnih luka i na isti bi ga način sklopio ulagač koji djeluje u skladu s tržišnim gospodarstvom.
Ryanair provided a study by a consultancy firm ([…]), which examined the contractual arrangements between Ryanair and FBS.
Ryanair je priložio studiju društva za poslovno savjetovanje […] u okviru koje su istraženi sporazumi između društava Ryanair i FBS.
Based on a comparative analysis of Schönefeld with Liverpool and Luton airports, the consultancy firm came to the conclusion that FBS acted vis-à-vis Ryanair in line with what would be expected from a private market economy operator.
Na temelju komparativne analize Zračne luke Schönefeld sa Zračnim lukama Liverpool i Luton društvo za poslovno savjetovanje zaključilo je da ponašanje FBS-a prema prijevozniku Ryanair odgovara ponašanju koje se očekuje od privatnog ulagača u tržišnom gospodarstvu.
Ryanair also argued that Berlin, like London and Milan, was a major European economic and administrative centre and therefore an important European destination.
Prema mišljenju prijevoznika Ryanair Berlin je značajno europsko ekonomsko i upravno središte kao London ili Milano, a time i važno europsko odredište u zračnom prometu.
Airlines operating in Berlin could therefore rely on a sufficient number of passengers willing to travel there.
Zračni prijevoznici sa sjedištem u Berlinu stoga mogu biti sigurni u postojanje dovoljnog broja putnika koji bi onamo htjeli otputovati.
With respect to the 2003 easyJet agreement, easyJet argued that a market economy operator acting in lieu of FBS would also have adopted this type of strategy.
U pogledu Ugovora s trgovačkim društvom easyJet iz 2003. easyJet je tvrdio da bi ulagač u tržišnom gospodarstvu, a koji djeluje umjesto FBS-a, jednako tako primijenio takvu strategiju.
Indeed, the measure had brought FBS a substantial increase in passenger numbers and improved annual results.
Činjenica jest da je FBS na temelju te mjere uspio zabilježiti znatan rast broja putnika i poboljšane rezultate na godišnjoj razini.
easyJet further stated that the existence of an individual fee arrangement between FBS and easyJet did not necessarily mean that discriminatory rebates had been granted. easyJet took the view that other airlines operating with the same growth targets would have been granted exactly the same treatment as easyJet.
Prijevoznik easyJet dalje je naveo da postojanje posebnog sporazuma u pogledu naknada između društava FBS i easyJet ne znači nužno da su odobreni diskriminirajući popusti. Prijevoznik easyJet smatrao je da su drugim zračnim prijevoznicima sa sličnim ciljevima u pogledu rasta pruženi jednaki uvjeti kao prijevozniku easyJet.
In any event, the rebates would be justified in light of the economies of scale provided by easyJet. easyJet accounted for a large proportion of all passengers at Schönefeld and would have made a disproportionate contribution to the improvement of FBS’s results.
U svakom slučaju popusti su bili opravdani s obzirom na ekonomiju razmjera koju je nudio easyJet. Većina putnika u zračnoj luci Schönefeld bili su klijenti prijevoznika easyJet, čime je easyJet iznimno pridonio poboljšanju rezultata FBS-a.
Regarding its use of Terminal B, easyJet remarked that this was not a closed-off airport terminal.
U pogledu upotrebe terminala B easyJet je naveo da nije bila riječ o terminalu zračne luke zatvorenog tipa.
In fact the area rented by easyJet was a separate check-in area and associated office space at Schönefeld’s North Terminal.
Činjenica jest da je easyJet uzeo u zakup odvojen prostor za registraciju i pripadajuće uredske prostore na sjevernom terminalu Zračne luke Schönefeld. Površina je većim dijelom bila javno dostupna i njome su se služili i putnici drugih zračnih prijevoznika.
Most of the area was publicly accessible and was also used by other carriers’ passengers.
U trenutku potpisivanja ugovora s prijevoznikom easyJet na terminalu B bilo je dovoljno slobodnih kapaciteta. Drugi zračni prijevoznici, prema tome, nisu došli u nepovoljan položaj.
At the time when the agreement with easyJet was signed there would have been sufficient spare capacity at Terminal B. Other airlines would therefore not have suffered from any disadvantage. easyJet stressed that since it began its operations at Schönefeld in 2004, it was the airline with by far the largest passenger throughput.
Prijevoznik easyJet naglasio je da je od početka poslovanja na Schönefeldu 2004. bilo zračni prijevoznik s daleko najvećim brojem putnika.
Its exclusive use of certain parts of Terminal B would therefore be objectively justified.
Isključiva upotreba određenih dijelova terminala B stoga je objektivno opravdana.
In addition, easyJet stated that the baggage handling system at Terminal B merely reflected usual technical standards and did not provide it with any advantage over other airlines.
Nadalje, sustav za prihvat i otpremu prtljage na terminalu B prema navodima prijevoznika easyJet samo je odgovarao uobičajenim tehničkim standardima i za easyJet time nije nastala nikakva prednost pred ostalim zračnim prijevoznicima.
As regards the market value of Terminal B, easyJet stated that the rent it paid was higher than what would reflect the market value of Terminal B, given that it was insufficient to meet easyJet’s capacity requirements.
U pogledu tržišne vrijednosti terminala B easyJet je naveo da je plaćeni zakup iznosio više od tržišne vrijednosti terminala B s obzirom na to da terminal nije ispunjavao zahtjeve prijevoznika easyJet u pogledu kapaciteta.
A rent comparison could only be made with similar areas at Schönefeld airport or, in relation to the offices, with office space in the immediate vicinity of the airport.
Usporedba zakupa stoga je moguća samo sa sličnim površinama u zračnoj luci Schönefeld ili, u pogledu ureda, s uredskim prostorima u neposrednoj blizini zračne luke.
FBS referred to Berlin’s particular situation, namely the airport system (originally made up of three airports) and the plans for the construction of the central Berlin Brandenburg airport (BER).
FBS je uputio na posebnu situaciju u Berlinu, to jest na sustav zračnih luka (koji se izvorno sastojao od triju zračnih luka) i na planove izgradnje središnje zračne luke Berlin-Brandenburg (BER).
In 2003, Schönefeld was operating at about half its traffic-handling capacity only and the airport was failing to cover its costs.
U 2003. samo je otprilike polovina prometnog kapaciteta Schönefelda bila iskorištena, a iz poslovanja zračne luke nisu se pokrivali troškovi.
According to FBS, the closure of Schönefeld would have led, inter alia, to the loss of Schönefeld’s operating licence, which was essential for the running of BER.
Prema podatcima FBS-a zatvaranje Schönefelda dovelo bi, među ostalim, do gubitka operativne licencije za Schönefeld, koja je bila neophodna za rad zračne luke BER.
FBS pointed out that the allegedly competing airports mentioned by the Commission in the opening decision were not actually competing against the Berlin airports because they were too remote from it.
FBS je naglasio da zračne luke koje Komisija u Odluci o pokretanju postupka navodi kao konkurentne zapravo nisu bile konkurentne berlinskim zračnim lukama jer je zemljopisna udaljenost između pojedinih zračnih luka bila prevelika.
With regard to the control and profit transfer agreement, FBS argued that in the business world, such agreements between companies within a group were commonplace.
U pogledu Ugovora o kontroli i prijenosu dobiti FBS je obrazložio da su takvi ugovori između poduzeća jedne grupe uobičajeni u poslovnom svijetu.
FBS took the view that a transfer of profits between the three Berlin airports was a purely internal matter for the undertaking.
FBS je smatrao da je prijenos dobiti između triju berlinskih zračnih luka unutarnje pitanje poduzeća.
According to FBS, the airport system formed a single undertaking, pursuing common interests, and mutually bound by company law.
Prema mišljenju FBS-a sustav zračnih luka činio je jedinstveno poduzeće koje je imalo zajedničke interese i koje je međusobno povezano u skladu s pravom trgovačkih društava.
The airport system would constitute a single geographic and product market.
Sustav zračnih luka predstavlja jedinstveno zemljopisno i proizvodno tržište.
It would be normal market practice, and in the present case it would also make commercial sense.
Prema tome, riječ je o uobičajenoj tržišnoj praksi, a u prethodno navedenom slučaju bilo je i opravdano s gospodarskog stajališta.
FBS disputed some of the provisional findings arrived at in the opening decision as regards the involvement of State resources.
FBS je osporio neke od privremenih zaključaka iz Odluke o pokretanju postupka u pogledu upotrebe državnih sredstava.
According to FBS, the fact that the schedule of charges had to be approved by public authorities was not sufficient to conclude that FBS’s resources were under State control.
Prema mišljenju tog poduzeća činjenicom da pravilnik o naknadama trebaju odobriti javna tijela ne opravdava se zaključak da je sredstva FBS-a kontrolirala država.