natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The appearance of the other word elements “Bière sans alcool”, “Bière de haute qualité”, “pur malt” and “Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg” and the figurative element is only secondary to the mark SILVER.
Izgled ostalih verbalnih elemenata ,Bière sans alcool', ,Bière de haute qualité', ,pur malt' i ,Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg' te figurativnog elementa tek je sekundaran žigu ,SILVER'.
It is also clear from the marketing study, the newspaper extract and the invoices that the actual trade mark is SILVER.
Iz marketinške studije, novinskog isječka i računa jasno proizlazi da je stvarni žig ,SILVER'.
The Office finds that the use of the word SILVER is so dominant in the figurative mark that it fulfils the requirements of having been used as registered.'
Ured smatra da je uporaba riječi ,SILVER' toliko dominantna u figurativnom žigu da ispunjava zahtjeve uporabe u obliku u kojem je registriran”.
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; dismissed 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Quantum, EU:C:2007:171
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; odbačeno 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2007:171
In any case, since the stylisation of the letter “q” suggests, as has just been said, the face of a watch, it is not particularly distinctive for goods in Class 14, the only goods for which the applicant has furnished proof of use of the earlier mark.
U svakom slučaju, kao što je prethodno navedeno, budući da stilizirano slovo ,q' predstavlja brojčanik sata, ono nije osobito razlikovno u pogledu proizvoda iz razreda 14. - jedinih proizvoda za koje je podnositelj prijave dostavio dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga.
The word ‘vigar' is an invented word and is, therefore, inherently distinctive.
Riječ „vigar” izmišljena je te stoga ima svojstven razlikovni karakter.
Given the fact that the word ‘vigar' is the only word element, and given its inherent distinctiveness, its central position and the fact that the additional elements highlight its presence, the word is the most distinctive element of the earlier mark.
S obzirom na činjenicu da je riječ „vigar” jedini verbalni element i s obzirom na njegovu svojstvenu razlikovnost, središnji položaj i činjenicu da dodatni elementi naglašavaju njegovu prisutnost, riječ je najrazlikovniji element ranijeg žiga.
The form as used differs from the earlier mark as registered only in the ascending orientation of its oval background, the use of lower case instead of upper case letters and the replacement of the crown element by a sequence of three dots.
Oblik žiga kako se upotrebljava razlikuje se od ranijeg žiga kako je registriran samo u uzlaznoj orijentaciji njegove ovalne pozadine, uporabi malih slova umjesto velikih slova i zamjeni elementa krune nizom od triju točaka.
The Court agreed that a different orientation of the same background, the use of upper case or lower case letters when they are standard letters that reproduce the same term, or the substitution of an ornamental element (the sequence of dots) for a laudatory element when both of those elements serve to reinforce the term ‘vigar', are minor differences that do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier trade mark as registered.
Sud se složio da drukčija orijentacija iste pozadine, uporaba velikih i malih slova kada je riječ o standardnim slovima kojima se prikazuje isti izraz ili zamjena ukrasnog elementa (niz točaka) pohvalnim elementom kada oba ta elementa služe za pojačanje pojma „vigar”, čine manje razlike koje ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga kako je registriran.
That finding is not called into question if the second form of use is taken into account, inasmuch as, even though, in that case, the basic background disappears and the word ‘spain' is present, the latter will be understood as a merely descriptive addition (paras 70-74).
Taj se nalaz ne dovodi u pitanje ako se u obzir uzme drugi oblik uporabe zato što će se, čak i ako u tom slučaju nestane osnovna pozadina i doda se riječ „spain”, potonje shvatiti samo kao opisni dodatak (t. 70. - 74.).
The distinctive character of the mark is essentially derived, not from its figurative elements, but from the word ‘vieta'.
Razlikovni karakter žiga u osnovi ne proizlazi iz njegovih figurativnih elemenata, već iz riječi „vieta”.
The element has a high level of distinctive character and occupies an important position in the overall impression created by the mark as registered, whilst the figurative elements have only weak distinctive character and occupy merely an ancillary position in the overall impression.
Taj element ima visoku razinu razlikovnog karaktera i zauzima važan položaj u ukupnom dojmu koji stvara žig kako je registriran, dok figurativni elementi imaju slab razlikovni karakter i zauzimaju samo sporedan položaj u stvaranju ukupnog dojma.
Those figurative elements, including the typeface used, have a relatively marginal visual impact.
Ti figurativni elementi, uključujući tipografska obilježja, imaju relativno marginalan vizualni utjecaj.
The rectangular border does not present any originality in relation to usual commercial use.
Pravokutni obrub ne predstavlja nikakvu originalnost u odnosu na uobičajenu komercijalnu uporabu.
As regards the figurative elements made up of, on the one hand, grey rectangles separating the letters of the word ‘vieta' and, on the other hand, white rectangles appearing in the middle of the sides of the rectangular border, they are very small in size, are not striking and do not present any originality (paras 47 and 48).
Kada je riječ o figurativnim elementima sastavljenima od, s jedne strane, sivih pravokutnika koji rastavljaju slova u riječi „vieta” i, s druge strane, bijelih pravokutnika koji se pojavljuju na sredini pravokutnih obruba s lijeve i desne strane riječi, oni su vrlo maleni, nisu upečatljivi i ne predstavljaju nikakvu originalnost (t. 47. i 48.).
The two Greek flags do not possess any distinctive character in relation to the products at hand which are commonly known to be food specialities originating from Greece.
Dvije grčke zastave ne posjeduju nikakav razlikovni karakter u odnosu na proizvode koji su dobro poznati kao specijaliteti podrijetlom iz Grčke.
This is supported by the whole get-up of the product, coloured in blue and white in accordance with the colours of the Greek flag, the depiction of scenery which calls to mind a Mediterranean scene and the symbol for a Protected Designation of Origin below the picture' (para. 39).
To podupire cjelokupni izgled proizvoda - plava i bijela boja u skladu s bojama grčke zastave, prikaz krajolika koji podsjeća na Mediteran i simbol zaštićene oznake izvornosti ispod slike” (t. 39.).
The Court took the view that, if no colour is claimed in the application, the use of different colour combinations ‘must be allowed, as long as the letters contrast against the background.'
Sud je smatrao da se, ako se u prijavi ne navodi nikakva boja, uporaba različitih kombinacija boja „mora dopustiti ako su slova u kontrastu s pozadinom”.
The Court also noted that the letters M, A, D were arranged in a particular way in the EUTM.
Sud je napomenuo i da su slova M, A, D u žigu EU-a raspoređena na poseban način.
Accordingly, representations of the sign that do not alter the arrangement of the letters, or the contrast of colour, constitute genuine use (paras 41 and 45).
U skladu s tim, prikazi znaka kojima se ne mijenja raspored slova ili kontrast boja predstavljaju stvarnu uporabu (t. 41. i 45.).
The word element was considered to be the dominant feature of the figurative mark, since it was in a central position and in large letters.
Smatra se da je verbalni element dominantno obilježje figurativnog žiga jer se nalazi u sredini i pisan je velikim slovima.
It was considered that the distinctive character was not changed (para. 15).
Procijenjeno je da razlikovni karakter nije izmijenjen (t. 15.).
‘The orange background is the colour of packaging of the products.
„Narančasta pozadina predstavlja boju ambalaže proizvoda.
The mark is used in black on a white background, outlined in silver similar to the earlier registered mark.
Za žig je upotrijebljena crna boja na bijeloj podlozi, s obrisom u srebrnoj boji, nalik ranijem registriranom žigu.
The typeface has been slightly modernised and the small hyphen between “Bi” and “Fi” has been deleted.
Oblik slova blago je moderniziran, a spojnica između ,Bi' i ,Fi' obrisana je.
The distinctive character of the earlier mark is still based on the large black letters “Bi Fi”, the “B” and “F” being in capital letters and the two “i” letters in lower case, on a white background and outlined in silver' (para. 45).
Razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga i dalje se temelji na velikim crnim slovima ,Bi Fi', pri čemu su slova ,B' i ,F' pisana velikim slovima, a dva slova ,i' malim slovima, na bijeloj pozadini i s obrisom u srebrnoj boji” (t. 45.).
(with word mark John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (AG case)
(s verbalnim žigom John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (predmet AG)
‘The colours covered by the application for registration were designated using the Munsell system as: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (green) and 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (yellow).
„Boje obuhvaćene prijavom za registraciju navedene su uporabom Munsellovog sustava boja: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (zelena) i 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (žuta).
The arrangement is described as being ‘green for the vehicle body and yellow for the wheels', as is shown by a picture attached to the application and reproduced below ' (para. 3).
Raspored je opisan na sljedeći način: ,zelena za karoseriju vozila i žuta za kotače‚, kako je prikazano na slici priloženoj uz prijavu i reproduciranoj u nastavku ” (t. 3.).
‘[A]lthough it is true that the disputed mark was used and promoted in conjunction with the word mark John Deere [underlining added] and that the intervener's advertising expenditure in the European Union was presented as a whole and not individually for each country, the applicant is wrong to claim that it was not proved to the required legal standard that the intervener had used the combination of the colours green and yellow on its goods as a trade mark and that the market penetration of its goods had been deep and long-lasting in all the Member States of the European Union as at 1 April 1996' (para. 46).
„[I]ako je istina da je osporavani žig bio u uporabi i promoviran zajedno s verbalnim žigom John Deere [isticanje naknadno dodano] i da je posrednikov trošak za oglašavanje u Europskoj uniji prikazan kao cjelina, a ne pojedinačno za svaku zemlju, podnositelj prijave je u krivu kada tvrdi da nije u dovoljnoj mjeri dokazano da je posrednik upotrebljavao kombinaciju zelene i žute boje kao žig na svojim proizvodima i da je prodor njegovih proizvoda na tržište bio intenzivan i dugotrajan u svim državama članicama Europske unije 1. travnja 1996.” (t. 46.).
In this case the use of the mark with a different spelling and the addition of the letter ‘C' alter the distinctive character of the registered sign, because the letters ‘VIT' are now seen as a descriptive element, namely ‘VIT C' (which refers to ‘Vitamin C').
U tom slučaju uporaba žiga uz izmijenjeni način pisanja i dodavanje slova „C” mijenja razlikovni karakter registriranog znaka zbog toga što se sada slova „VIT” percipiraju kao opisni element, odnosno „VIT C” (koji se odnosi na „Vitamin C”).
‘[T]he ‘NOVEDADES' catalogues dated 2004-2009 consistently show the mark and only this version.
„[K]atalozi ,NOVEDADES' s datumom iz 2004. - 2009. dosljedno prikazuju žig i to samo ovu inačicu.
This does not constitute use of the mark [as registered] (with or without colour) as admissible under Article 15(1)(a) CTMR [now Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR].
To se ne smatra uporabom znaka [u obliku u kojemu je registriran] (sa ili bez boje) kako je dopuštena na temelju članka 15. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe o žigu Zajednice [koji je postao članak 18. stavak 1. točka (a) Uredbe o žigu EU-a].
The mere fact that both marks include a word element LLOYD'S is not enough for that purpose, also the figurative elements of the earlier mark must appear in the form as used.
Sama činjenica da oba žiga uključuju verbalni element ,LLOYD'S' nije dostatna u tu svrhu, a i figurativni elementi ranijeg žiga moraju se pojaviti u obliku u kojem se upotrebljavaju.
The form as used is in a different font, lacks the single letter L at the end and surrounded by an orbital device, and lacks the circular or orbital device around the word ‘LLOYD'S'.
Oblik koji je u uporabi ima drukčiju vrstu slova, nedostaje mu samostalno slovo ,L' na kraju i okružuje ga element koji nalikuje orbiti, a nedostaje mu kružni ili orbitalni element oko riječi ,LLOYD'S'.
In other words, all its figurative elements are missing in the form as used.
Drugim riječima, nedostaju svi figurativni elementi u obliku koji je u uporabi.
On top, the form as used contains the conspicuous device of a flying bird with a long beak.
Oblik u uporabi na vrhu ima upadljivi element ptice u letu s dugim kljunom.
The omission of all the figurative elements of the mark as registered and the addition of another figurative element does alter, in the form as used, the distinctive character of the mark and is much more than a mere variation or modernisation' (para. 35).
Izostavljanje svih figurativnih elemenata žiga kako je registriran i dodavanje drugog figurativnog elementa u obliku koji je u uporabi mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga i on predstavlja više od same varijante ili modernijeg izričaja” (t. 35.).
There are significant differences between the sign used and the earlier mark in its registered form.
Postoje znatne razlike između žiga koji se upotrebljava i ranijeg žiga u obliku u kojem je registriran.
Those differences are such as to alter, from the perspective of the average French consumer to whom the goods in Class 25 are addressed, the distinctiveness of the earlier mark in its registered form.
Iz perspektive prosječnog francuskog potrošača kojemu su namijenjeni proizvodi iz razreda 25., te su razlike takve da mijenjaju razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga u obliku u kojem je registriran.
The graphic element of that mark, consisting of a stylised signature, disappears entirely from the sign used and is replaced by a radically different graphic element which is very classical, symmetrical and static.
Grafički element tog znaka, koji se sastoji od stiliziranog potpisa, potpuno nestaje iz znaka u uporabi i zamjenjuje ga izrazito različit grafički element koji je vrlo klasičan, simetričan i statičan.
The earlier mark in its registered form attracts attention by its asymmetry and the dynamism conferred by the movement of the letters from left to right.
Raniji žig u obliku u kojem je registriran privlači pažnju svojom asimetrijom i dinamikom koja se postiže kretanjem slova slijeva nadesno.
The differences between the abovementioned mark and sign are not negligible and the mark and sign cannot be regarded as being broadly equivalent within the meaning of the case-law.
Razlike između prethodno spomenutog žiga i znaka nisu zanemarive, a žig i znak ne mogu se smatrati umnogome jednakima u smislu sudske prakse.
03/10/2008, R 1533/20074, Geo Madrid (fig.) / GEO Telecommunication services in Class 38.
03/10/2008, R 1533/20074, Geo Madrid (fig.) / GEO Telekomunikacijske usluge iz razreda 38.
Disposable diapers of paper and cellulose (Class 16).
Jednokratne pelene za djecu od papira i celuloze (razred 16.)
Not OK (para. 29).
Nije u redu (t. 29.).
Administration of funds and personal assets or real estate affairs (Class 36).
Upravljanje sredstvima i osobnom imovinom ili nekretninama (razred 36.)
Not OK (para. 39).
Nije u redu (t. 39.).
Advertising, business management, business administration, office functions in Class 35.
Oglašavanje, poslovno upravljanje; upravljanje poduzećima, uredski poslovi iz razreda 35.
If a trade mark is registered for the general indications in Class 35, but use is proven only for retail services for particular goods, this cannot amount to valid proof of use for any of the specific indications of Class 35 or the class heading as a whole (para. 25 by analogy).
Ako je žig registriran za opće oznake iz razreda 35., ali je njegova uporaba dokazana samo za maloprodajne usluge za određene proizvode, to se ne smatra valjanim dokazom o uporabi bilo koje oznake iz razreda 35. ili naslova razreda u cjelini (t. 25., analogijom).
Contested sign Case No
Osporavani znak Broj predmeta
CARRERA 09/09/2009, R 260/20094, (revocation)
CARRERA 09/09/2009, R 260/20094, (opoziv)
The proven use of a trade mark for: decorative lettering; increased performance packages; covers for storage compartments; wheel sets and complete wheel sets for summer and winter; and door sill cover plates was considered sufficient proof of use for motor vehicle and land vehicle parts overall, for which the mark was registered.
Dokazana uporaba žiga za: ukrasna slova; pakete za bolju učinkovitost; presvlake za pretince namijenjene skladištenju; komplete kotača i potpune komplete kotača za ljeto i zimu; i pokrovne pločice za pragove vrata. smatra se općenito dostatnim dokazom o uporabi za dijelove motornih vozila i kopnenih vozila za koje je žig registriran.
The main arguments were that it was used for numerous different motor vehicle parts and the goods for which use had been proven thus covered a wide spectrum of motor vehicle parts: elements of the chassis, the bodywork, the engine, the interior design and decorative elements.
Glavni argumenti bili su da se žig upotrebljavao za brojne različite dijelove motornih vozila i da su proizvodi za koje je uporaba dokazana obuhvaćali širok spektar dijelova motornih vozila: dijelove šasije, karoseriju, motor, dizajn interijera i dekorativne elemente.
G&S: polish for metals in Class 3.
Proizvodi i usluge: pripravci za poliranje metala u razredu 3.
Assessment of PoU: the earlier mark was registered for polish for metals in Class 3, but was actually used genuinely only for magic cotton (a product for polishing metals consisting of cotton impregnated with a polishing agent).
Procjena dokaza o uporabi: raniji žig registriran je za pripravke za poliranje metala u razredu 3., ali se zapravo upotrebljavao samo za čarobni pamuk (proizvod za poliranje metala koji se sastoji od pamuka impregniranog sredstvom za poliranje).
The Court held that ‘polish for metals', which in itself is already a subcategory of the class heading term polishing preparations, is sufficiently precise and narrowly defined in terms of the function and intended purpose of the claimed goods.
Sud je smatrao da su pripravci za poliranje metala, koji su već sami po sebi potkategorija pojma iz naslova razreda pripravci za poliranje, dovoljno precizan i usko definiran pojam u pogledu funkcije i namjene predmetnih proizvoda.
No further subcategory can be established without being artificial, and thus, use for the entire category of polish for metals was assumed.
S obzirom na to da nije bilo moguće odrediti nijednu daljnju potkategoriju koja pri tom ne bi zvučala neprirodno, prihvaćena je uporaba cijele kategorije pripravci za poliranje metala.
Turbo 19/06/2007, R 378/20062, TURBO Revocation
Turbo 19/06/2007, R 378/20062, TURBO Opoziv
G&S: clothing in Class 25.
Proizvodi i usluge: odjeća u razredu 25.
Assessment of PoU: the Board found that, in addition to swimwear, other types of clothing were referred to in the invoices and could be found in the catalogues.
Procjena dokaza o uporabi: vijeće je utvrdilo da su u računima osim kupaćih kostima bile navedene i druge vrste odjeće koje su se mogle pronaći u katalozima.
Thus, the Board found that use of the contested mark had been proved for clothing (para. 22).
Prema tome, vijeće je utvrdilo da je uporaba osporavanog žiga za odjeću dokazana (t. 22.).
The Board, moreover, found it almost impossible and certainly unduly onerous to impose on the proprietor of a registered EUTM for clothing the obligation to demonstrate use in all possible subcategories that could be endlessly subdivided by the applicant (para. 25).
Nadalje, vijeće je utvrdilo da je gotovo nemoguće, a svakako neopravdano opterećujuće, nametnuti nositelju registriranog žiga EU-a za odjeću obvezu dokazivanja uporabe u svim mogućim potkategorijama koje podnositelj prijave može u nedogled dijeliti u potkategorije (t. 25.).
19/01/2009, R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); confirmed 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
19/01/2009, R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); potvrđeno 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
G&S: measuring apparatus and instruments in Class 9.
Proizvodi i usluge: aparati i instrumenti za mjerenje u razredu 9.
Assessment of PoU: the mark was used for apparatus and parts thereof for the measurement of temperature, pressure and level.
Procjena dokaza o uporabi: žig se upotrebljavao za aparate za mjerenje temperature, tlaka i razine, te za njihove dijelove.
The contested decision considered that the original specification of the earlier mark for measuring apparatus and instruments was a ‘very wide' one, and determined, applying the criteria established in the Aladin judgment, that use had in fact only been shown for a subcategory of goods, namely: measuring apparatus, all being for the measurement of temperature, pressure and level; parts for the aforesaid apparatus.
U osporavanoj odluci procijenjeno je da je izvorna specifikacija ranijeg žiga za aparate i instrumente za mjerenje bila „vrlo široka” pa je, primjenom kriterija koji su utvrđeni u presudi „Aladin”, zaključeno da je uporaba zapravo dokazana samo za jednu potkategoriju proizvoda, odnosno za: aparate za mjerenje, uključujući sve aparate za mjerenje temperature, tlaka i razine te dijelove navedenih aparata.
The Board found that approach to be a reasonable one in the circumstances of the case and endorsed the reasoning and findings of the contested decision in this regard (para. 29).
Vijeće je utvrdilo da je taj pristup razuman u okolnostima predmeta te je u tom pogledu podržalo obrazloženje i zaključke osporavane odluke (t. 29.).
ICEBERG 23/07/2009, R 1166/20081, ICEBERG Revocation
ICEBERG 23/07/2009, R 1166/20081, ICEBERG Opoziv
G&S: apparatus for heating, steam generating, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and water supply purposes in Class 11.
Proizvodi i usluge: uređaji za grijanje, proizvodnju pare, hlađenje, sušenje, ventilaciju i vodoopskrbu u razredu 11.
Assessment of PoU: the Board concluded that the trade mark use was only proven for fridges, freezers and air-conditioning modules for yachts and boats (para. 26).
Procjena dokaza o uporabi: vijeće je zaključilo da je uporaba žiga dokazana samo za hladnjake, zamrzivače i uređaje za klimatizaciju na jahtama i brodovima (t. 26.).
These goods were included in the subcategories apparatus for heating (insofar as an air-conditioning machine can also perform as a heater), apparatus for refrigerating (insofar as an air-conditioning machine, a fridge and a freezer can keep air/things cold), and apparatus for ventilating (insofar as an air-conditioning machine, a fridge and a freezer all include ventilation circuits), for which the mark was registered.
Ti su proizvodi uključeni u potkategorije uređaji za grijanje (ako uređaj za klimatizaciju može obavljati funkcije grijača), uređaji za hlađenje (ako uređaj za klimatizaciju, hladnjak i zamrzivač mogu hladiti zrak/predmete), i uređaji za ventilaciju (ako uređaj za klimatizaciju, hladnjak i zamrzivač uključuju ventilacijski krug) za koje je žig registriran.
Therefore, the Board thought it should remain registered for those subcategories (para. 27).
Prema tome, vijeće je smatralo da žig treba ostati registriran za te potkategorije (t. 27.).
However, the Board did not consider it appropriate to limit the scope of protection of the trade mark to yachts and boats.
Međutim, nije smatralo da je primjereno ograničiti opseg zaštite žiga na jahte i brodove.
This would have further split the ‘subcategories' and would amount to unjustified limitation (para. 28).
Time bi se „potkategorije” dodatno podijelile, što bi podrazumijevalo neopravdano ograničenje (t. 28.).
Conclusion: use was considered proven for apparatus for heating, refrigerating and ventilating.
Zaključak: uporaba je dokazana za uređaje za grijanje, hlađenje i ventilaciju.
LOTUS 02/12/2008, R 1295/20074, LOTUS Revocation
LOTUS 02/12/2008, R 1295/20074, LOTUS Opoziv