natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a of the Penal Code), offering a bribe (Article 348 of the Penal Code) and offering a bribe in economic business operations (Article 294. b of the Penal Code).
116/10.) u točki 3. određena je nadležnost Ureda za kaznena djela pranja novca iz članka 279.
The term passive bribery encompasses accepting a bribe, while the term active bribery refers to offering of a bribe.
Pod pojmom pasivnog podmićivanja podrazumijeva se primanje mita, a pod pojmom aktivnog podmićivanja podrazumijeva se davanje mita.
a of the Penal Code) and Offering a bribe in economic business operations (Article 294.
a Kaznenog zakona) i davanje mita u gospodarskom poslovanju (članak 294.
b of the Penal Code).
b Kaznenog zakona).
Bribe is in everyday comunication as well as in legal terminology understood as offering of a gift or some other advantage to the official or responsible person, who, specifically because of that, either performs an activity he/she is not authorised to perform, or misses to perform an action which he/she is obliged to perform.
Pod mitom se u svakodnevnom govoru i u pravnoj terminologiji podrazumijeva davanje dara ili kakve druge koristi službenoj ili odgovornoj osobi koja upravo zbog toga ili obavlja radnju koju u okviru svoje ovlasti ne bi smjela obaviti ili ne obavlja radnju koju bi morala obaviti.
Criminal offence of accepting a bribe is a corruptive criminal offence which relates to officials.
Kazneno djelo primanja mita koruptivno je službeničko kazneno djelo.
On the basis of paragraph 2 Article 347 it is evident that this criminal offences will exist if official or responsible person solicits a gift or some other gain, accepts a gift or some other gain or when official or responsible person accepts a promise to be given a gift or some other gain, in order to perform, within the scope of his/her authority, an official or other act which he/she should perform anyway, or to omit to perform an official or other act which he/she should not perform.
Na temelju stavka 2. članka 347. proizlazi da će to kazneno djelo postojati ako službena osoba ili odgovorna osoba zahtijeva dar ili kakvu drugu korist, primi dar ili kakvu drugu korist ili kad službena ili odgovorna osoba primi obećanje dara ili kakve druge koristi da, u granicama svoje ovlasti, obavi službenu ili drugu radnju koju bi morala obaviti ili da ne obavi službenu ili drugu radnju koju ne bi smjela obaviti.
Besides mentioned, soliciting or accepting of a gift or some other gain by an official person, after he/she performed an official or other act which he/she should perform anyway, i.e. after she omitted to perform an official or other act which he/she should not perform, is also incriminated.
Osim navedenoga, inkriminirano je i zahtijevanje ili primanje dara ili kakve druge koristi od strane službene osobe nakon što je obavila službenu ili drugu radnju koju je morala obaviti odnosno nije obavila službenu ili drugu radnju koju nije smjela obaviti.
So, in this case the bribe is not given, promised or solicited in advance, but it is a matter of subsequent solicitation or acceptation of a gift or some other gain by an official or responsible person.
Dakle, u tom slučaju mito nije unaprijed dano, obećano ili zahtijevano, nego je riječ o naknadnom zahtijevanju ili primanju dara ili kakve druge koristi od strane službene ili odgovorne osobe.
For criminal offence from Paragraph 1 of this Article prescribed sanction span is one to eight years of imprisonment, for Paragraph 2 six months to five years of imprisonment, and for Paragraph 3 fine or imprisonment up to one year.
Za kazneno djelo iz stavka 1. ovog članka propisana je kazna zatvora od jedne do osam godina, za stavak 2. od šest mjeseci do pet godina, a za stavak 3. novčana kazna ili kazna zatvora do jedne godine.
Criminal offence is committed with acceptance or solicitation of a gift or some other gain, i.e. with a promise of a gift or some other material gain.
Kazneno djelo dovršeno je primanjem ili zahtijevanjem dara ili kakve druge koristi odnosno obećanjem dara ili kakve druge imovinske koristi.
In order for criminal offence to be completed, it is necessary for the official or responsible person to accept a gift or some other material gain in order not to perform, within the scope of his/her authority, omits to perform an official or other act which he/she should perform.
Da bi djelo bilo dovršeno, potrebno je da službena ili odgovorna osoba primi dar ili kakvu imovinsku korist da, u granicama svoje ovlasti, ne obavi službenu ili drugu radnju koju bi morala obaviti.
According to data from the Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organized Crime (USKOK), crime reports for “regular” acceptance of bribe are submitted quite more often, while there is significantly smaller number of crime reports for “irregular” acceptance of a bribe.
Prema podacima Ureda za suzbijanje korupcije i organiziranog kriminaliteta (USKOK-a), znatno se češće podnose kaznene prijave za „pravo” primanje mita, dok je kaznenih prijava za „nepravo” primanje mita znatno manje.
Crime reports for subsequent solicitation of a bribe are proportionately rare in practice.
Prijave za naknadno zahtijevanje mita razmjerno su rijetke u praksi.
Graph 27 shows the number of reported persons for criminal offence of accepting a bribe, during the observed three-year period.
Grafikon 27. prikazuje broj prijavljenih osoba za kazneno djelo primanja mita u promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju.
For this criminal offence, public prosecutor's offices and USKOK made 174 decisions whence submitted crime report.
Za to kazneno djelo, državna odvjetništva i USKOK su donijeli 174 odluke u povodu kaznenih prijava.
Increased number of crime reports for criminal offence of accepting a bribe does not necessarily mean a significant advancement in fight against corruption, that is, decrease in the number of crime reports does not necessarily mean that measures aimed at suppression of corruptive behaviours are not implemented.
Povećan broj kaznenih prijava za kazneno djelo primanja mita ne znači i veliki napredak u borbi protiv korupcije, odnosno manji broj kaznenih prijava ne znači da se ne poduzimaju mjere radi suzbijanja koruptivnog ponašanja.
Results from the pilot survey on victims of crime, implemented in September 2008 by the Croatian Central Bureau of Statistics, show also opinions from public on high and low possibility of corruptive activities.
Rezultati pilot-istraživanja o žrtvama kriminala koje je proveo Državni zavod za statistiku u rujnu 2008. pokazuju i mišljenja javnosti o visokoj te niskoj vjerojatnosti koruptivnog ponašanja.
Pilot survey was implemented on sample of 2000 households, on the entire territory of the Republic of Croatia, and 490 questionnaires (interviews) were concluded successfully.
Pilot-istraživanje je provedeno na uzorku od 2000 kućanstava na području cijele Republike Hrvatske, a realizirano je 490 upitnika (intervjua).
Data collection has been done by Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI method).
Prikupljanje podataka provedeno je telefonskim intervjuom uz pomoć računala (metoda CATI).
On survey question on occupations which are deemed to have high probability of corruptive behaviour, almost 50% of respondents answered that here should be mentioned members of parliament, officials within ministries as well as officials from local and regional self-government.
Na anketno pitanje o tome kod kojih zanimanja postoji visoka vjerojatnost koruptivnog ponašanja, gotovo 50% ispitanika odgovorilo je da su to članovi parlamenta, službenici u ministarstvima te službenici lokalne ili regionalne samouprave.
This pilot survey showed that respondents think the low probability of corruptive behaviour is among professors, doctors and medical nurses, police officers and court officials.
Navedeno pilot anketno istraživanje pokazalo je mišljenje ispitanika o tome da je niska vjerojatnost koruptivnog ponašanja kod profesora, liječnika i medicinskih sestara, policajaca te službenika na sudu.
Graph 28 displays all types of decisions by public prosecutor's offices, made after the submission of crime report, for criminal offence of accepting a bribe, during the observed period from 2008 to 2010.
U grafikonu 28. dan je prikaz svih vrsta odluka državnih odvjetništava u povodu kaznene prijave za kazneno djelo primanja mita u promatranom razdoblju od 2008. do 2010.
With regard to decisions made by public prosecutor's offices for this criminal offences, 57 of them are crime report rejections, 2 relate to terminated investigation, while there was 114 decisions on accusation.
U odnosu na donesene odluke državnih odvjetništava za to kazneno djelo, njih 57 su odbačaji kaznenih prijava, dvije odluke odnose se na obustavljenu istragu, dok je 114 odluka o optuženju.
Number of decisions of accusation is proportionately smaller by each year of the observed period.
Broj odluka o optuženju razmjerno je manji po godinama promatranog razdoblja.
Data in the graph 29 show the number of persons accused, by decision types for criminal offence of accepting a bribe.
Podaci u grafikonu 29. pokazuju broj optuženih osoba prema vrsti odluke za kazneno djelo primanja mita.
During the observed three- year period, for these criminal offence 73 persons were accused, out of which 50 were convicted in the end.
U promatranom trogodišnjem razdoblju, za to kazneno djelo optužene su 73 osobe, od kojih je 50 proglašeno krivima.
Judgement of acquittal was issued for 12 persons and judgement rejecting charges for 8 persons.
Oslobađajuća presuda donesena je za 12 osoba, a odbijajuća presuda za osam osoba.
Criminal proceeding had been terminated for 3 persons.
Kazneni postupak obustavljen je za tri osobe.
With regard to the whole observed period, one can notice proportionately higher number of convictions and a proportionately smaller number of terminated investigations, judgements of acquittal as well as judgement rejecting charges.
U odnosu na cijelo promatrano razdoblje, uočava se razmjerno veći broj osuđujućih presuda te razmjerno manji broj obustavljenih istraga, oslobađajućih te odbijajućih presuda.
Data on structure of pronounced sanctions for criminal offence of accepting a bribe for 2008 to 2010 are shown in graph 30.
U grafikonu 30. dani su podaci o strukturi izrečenih sankcija za kazneno djelo primanja mita od 2008. do 2010.
During observed three-year period, for this criminal offence 38 sanctions of unsuspended imprisonment had been pronounced, as well as 12 suspended imprisonments.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za to kazneno djelo izrečeno je 38 bezuvjetnih kazni zatvora te 12 uvjetnih kazni zatvora.
Data on pronounced sanctions for criminal offence of accepting a bribe indicate that during the observed three-year period, more sanctions of unsuspended imprisonment had been pronounces than during the observed six- year period between 2002 and 2007.
Podaci o izrečenim sankcijama za kazneno djelo primanja mita pokazuju da je u promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju izrečeno više bezuvjetnih zatvorskih kazni nego u promatranome šestogodišnjem razdoblju od 2002. do 2007.
Looking at individual years and by comparing these two observed periods, it is evident that there is a significantly smaller number of pronounced sanctions of suspended imprisonment.
Promatrano po pojedinim godinama te usporedbom ova dva promatrana razdoblja zamjetno je da je znatno manji broj izricanja uvjetnih zatvorskih kazni.
Graph 31 shows the number of persons convicted for the criminal offence of accepting a bribe, by length of unsuspended imprisonment67).
U grafikonu 31. prikazan je broj osuđenih osoba za kazneno djelo primanja mita prema visini kazne bezuvjetnog zatvora67).
During the observed three-year period, for criminal offence of accepting a bribe 38 sanctions of unsuspended imprisonment were pronounced.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za kazneno djelo primanja mita izrečeno je 38 bezuvjetnih zatvorskih kazni.
Looking at sanction spans, 8 sanctions between 3 and 6 months of unsuspended imprisonment were pronounced, 20 sanctions between 6 and 12 months of imprisonment, 6 sanctions from 1 to 2 years of imprisonment, one sanction from 2 to 3 years of imprisonment, two sanctions from 3 to 5 years of imprisonment, as well as one sanction from 5 to 10 years of imprisonment.
Promatrano po rasponima izrečenih kazni zatvora, izrečeno je osam bezuvjetnih zatvorskih kazni od 3 do 6 mjeseci, 20 zatvorskih kazni od 6 do 12 mjeseci, šest kazni zatvora od 1 do 2 godine, jedna kazna zatvora od 2 do 3 godine, dvije kazne zatvora od 3 do 5 godina i jedna kazna zatvora od 5 do 10 godina.
Graph 32 shows the number of persons convicted for the criminal offence of accepting a bribe, by length of suspended imprisonment.
U grafikonu 32. prikazan je broj osuđenih osoba za kazneno djelo primanja mita prema visini uvjetne kazne zatvora.
During the observed three-year period, the most often suspended imprisonment sanctions was between 6 and 12 months.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju najčešće je izricana uvjetna kazna zatvora od 6 do 12 mjeseci.
Graph 33 shows the number of perpetrators against whom pecuniary gain acquired by criminal offence of accepting a bribe was confiscated.
U grafikonu 33. prikazan je broj počinitelja kojima je oduzeta imovinska korist za kazneno djelo primanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, for 32 perpetrators of this criminal offences, measure of confiscation of pecuniary gain was pronounced, which is significantly more than during twice as long period (between 2002 and 2007 pecuniary gain had been confiscated from 23 persons convicted, for criminal offence of accepting a bribe).
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za 32 počinitelja kaznenog djela primanja mita izrečena je mjera oduzimanja imovinske koristi, što je mnogo više nego u dvostruko duljemu prije promatranom razdoblju (od 2002. do 2007. imovinska korist oduzeta je u odnosu na 23 osuđene osobe za kazneno djelo primanja mita).
This criminal offence commits a person who gives or promises to give a gift or some other gain to official or responsible person in order to perform, within the scope of his/her authority, an official or other act which he/she should not perform, or to omit an official or other act which he/her should otherwise perform, or whoever mediates in bribing an official or responsible person in such a way.
Kaznenog zakona čini ona osoba koja službenoj ili odgovornoj osobi da ili obeća dar ili kakvu drugu korist da u granicama svoje ovlasti obavi službenu ili drugu radnju koju ne bi smjela obaviti ili da ne obavi službenu ili drugu radnju koju bi morala obaviti, ili tko posreduje pri takvu podmićivanju službene ili odgovorne osobe.
Therefore, in the case of „regular“ active bribery a gift of some other gain is being given to official or responsible person, in order to perform, within the scope of his/her authority, an act which is embedded with the range of his/her service, but which should not be performed with regard to the person giving a bribe and with regard to other circumstances.
Dakle u slučaju „pravoga” aktivnog podmićivanja daje se dar ili kakva druga korist službenoj ili odgovornoj osobi da u granicama svoje ovlasti obavi radnju koja spada u okvir njegove službe, ali se u konkretnom slučaju u odnosu na osobu koja daje mito i s obzirom na sve okolnosti ne bi smjela obaviti.
This will be the case, for instance, of official or responsible persons who issues certain persuasion or certificate to person giving a bribe, to which he is not entitled as he does not comply with prescribed conditions.
To će, primjerice, biti slučaj službene ili odgovorne osobe koja izdaje kakvo uvjerenje ili svjedodžbu davatelju mita, na koju on nema pravo jer ne ispunjava uvjete.
As opposed to criminal offence from the paragraph 1 of this article, in this case a gift or some other gain is given to perform an act which official or responsible person should perform or should not perform.
Za razliku od kaznenog djela iz stavka 1. ovog članka, u ovom slučaju dar ili kakva korist daje se za obavljanje radnje koju ta službena ili odgovorna osoba mora obaviti ili koju ne smije obaviti.
This will be the case, for example, if person giving a bribe has the right to certain persuasion or certificate, which is being issued by the person accepting a bribe, and he/ she urgently needs this document but knows that he/she will not be able to acquire one during some longer period of time.
To će primjerice biti slučaj kada davatelj mita ima pravo na svjedodžbu ili potvrdu koju mu treba izdati osoba koja prima mito, a koja mu je žurno potrebna i za koju zna da je neće moći dobiti u duljem razdoblju.
Situations in which, due to extensive work load as well as due to insufficient administrative capacities, clients have to wait long time to acquire their rights are exactly those which most often generate cases of bribery within the public sector.
Upravo situacije u kojima zbog opterećenosti poslom te zbog nedostatka administrativnih kapaciteta stranke dugo čekaju na ostvarenje svojih prava najčešće i generiraju slučajeve podmićivanja u javnom sektoru.
It is a kind of help to the person giving a bribe, because the intermediation is performed when a gift is given by intermediation of some other person.
Riječ je o svojevrsnom pomaganju osobi koja daje mito jer će posredovanje biti posrijedi kada se dar daje posredovanjem druge osobe.
It is not a crucial element for intermediation that a person performing intermediation keeps a part of a gift for himself, because the definition of a criminal offence is realised without that element.
Za posredovanje nije odlučujuće ako osoba koja posreduje pri podmićivanju službene osobe dio dara zadrži za sebe jer je biće kaznenog djela davanja mita ostvareno i bez toga.
Graph 34 shows the number of reported persons for criminal offence of offering a bribe.
U grafikonu 34. prikazan je broj prijavljenih osoba za kazneno djelo davanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, 229 persons had been reported for this criminal offence.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za to kazneno djelo prijavljeno je 229 osoba.
Crime report were submitted significantly more often for „regular” active bribery while there was significantly less crime reports for „irregular” bribe offering.
Kaznene prijave mnogo se češće podnose za „pravo” aktivno podmićivanje, dok je kaznenih prijava za „nepravo” davanje mita mnogo manje.
In practice most often cases are those where together with crime report for accepting a bribe, crime report against person offering a bribe is submitted as well.
U praksi su najčešći slučajevi kada se uz prijavu za primanje mita podnosi i prijava protiv osobe koja daje mito.
In addition to these cases, there is a significant number of cases where person who is solicited to give a bribe submits a crime report to USKOK.
No, uz te slučajeve, znatan je broj i onih slučajeva da osoba od koje se traži da dâ mito podnosi prijavu o tome USKOK-u.
In these cases criminal proceeding against person who submitted crime report is not initiated, because he is considered as a reliable person.
U tom slučaju ne pokreće se kazneni postupak protiv te osobe jer se ona pojavljuje u ulozi pouzdanika.
Furthermore, there are a proportionate number of cases where criminal offence of offering a bribe is reported by official persons, before all, police officers to whom perpetrators caught while committing misdemeanour or criminal offence offer money to avoid crime report or misdemeanour report for misdemeanour.
Nadalje, razmjeran je broj slučajeva da kazneno djelo davanja mita prijavljuju službene osobe, ponajprije policijski službenici kojima počinitelji zatečeni u činjenju prekršaja ili činjenju kaznenog djela nude novac kako protiv njih ne bi bila podnesena prekršajna ili kaznena prijava.
In similar cases of corruptive behaviour, crime reports are submitted by other state officials (custom officers, tax collectors, inspectors, etc.).
Ako su posrijedi slični slučajevi koruptivnog ponašanja, kaznene prijave podnose i drugi državni službenici (carinici, poreznici, inspektori i sl.).
Graph 35 shows decision types from public prosecutor's offices whence submission of crime reports for criminal offence of offering a bribe.
U grafikonu 35. prikazane su vrste odluka državnih odvjetništava u povodu kaznenih prijava za kazneno djelo davanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, public prosecutor's offices made 229 decisions upon submission of crime reports.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju državna odvjetništva donijela su 229 odluka u povodu kaznenih prijava.
Public prosecutor's offices made decisions on accusation significantly more often (85% of all decisions).
Državna odvjetništva mnogo su češće donosila odluke o optuženju (85% svih odluka).
Some crime reports were rejected due to lack of suspicion or because reported cases are not defined as criminal offence.
Neke od kaznenih prijava odbačene su zbog nedostatne sumnje ili zbog toga što prijavljeni slučajevi nemaju obilježja kaznenog djela.
Graph 36 shows data on accused persons, by decision type, for criminal offence of offering a bribe.
U grafikonu 36. prikazani su podaci o optuženim osobama prema vrsti odluke za kazneno djelo davanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, for this criminal offence 165 persons had been accused, out of whom 142 persons were convicted.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za to kazneno optuženo je 165 osoba, od kojih su 142 proglašene krivima.
Criminal proceeding had been terminated with regard to 5 persons.
Kazneni postupak obustavljen je za pet osoba.
There were 18 judgement rejecting charges, while there was no judgement of acquittal for this criminal offence.
Odbijajućih presuda je 18, a nije donesena ni jedna oslobađajuća presuda za to kazneno djelo.
Graph 37 shows the number of convicted persons, by sanctions pronounced, for criminal offence of offering a bribe.
U grafikonu 37. prikazan je broj osuđenih osoba prema izrečenim sankcijama za kazneno djelo davanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, 142 persons were convicted for this criminal offence out of which 27 were convicted to unsuspended imprisonment, and 115 to suspended imprisonment.
U grafikonu 38. prikazan je broj osuđenih osoba za kazneno djelo davanja mita prema visini, odnosno rasponima kazne bezuvjetnog zatvora.
One sanction ranging between 1 and 2 months of unsuspended imprisonment was pronounced, as well as one sanction of unsuspended imprisonment ranging between 1 and 2 years.
Izrečena je jedna kazna bezuvjetnog zatvora od 1 do 2 mjeseca te jedna kazna bezuvjetnog zatvora od 1 do 2 godine.
Graph 39 shows the number of persons convicted for criminal offence of offering a bribe, by the length of imprisonment penalty pronounced when applying conditional conviction.
U grafikonu 39. prikazan je broj osuđenih osoba za kazneno djelo davanja mita prema visini izrečene kazne zatvora kod primjene uvjetne osude.
Data indicate that that the most often pronounced sanctions of suspended imprisonment ranged between 3 and 6 months (55 of convictions), 6 and 12 months (38 of convictions) and between 2 and 3 months (18 convictions).
Podaci govore o tome da su najčešće izricane uvjetne kazne zatvora od 3 do 6 mjeseci (55 osuda), potom od 6 do 12 mjeseci (38 osuda) te uvjetne kazne od 2 do 3 mjeseca (18 osuda).
Two sanction of suspended imprisonment ranging between 1 and 2 months were pronounced, as well as two sanctions of suspended imprisonment ranging between 1 and 2 years.
Izrečene su dvije kazne uvjetnog zatvora od 1 do 2 mjeseca te dvije kazne uvjetnog zatvora od 1 do 2 godine.
Graph 40 shows the number of persons from whom pecuniary gain acquired by criminal offence of offering a bribe was confiscated.
U grafikonu 40. prikazan je broj osoba kojima je oduzeta imovinska korist zbog kaznenog djela davanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, measure of confiscation of pecuniary gain was pronounced to 11 perpetrators of this criminal offence.
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju mjera oduzimanja imovinske koristi donijeta je u odnosu na 11 počinitelja kaznenog djela davanja mita.
International conventions which deal with corruption, make difference between bribery in public and in private sector.
Međunarodne konvencije koje se odnose na korupciju razlikuju podmićivanje u javnome i privatnom sektoru.