natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The latter, also a Turkish national, has lived since 1998 in that country where he manages a limited liability company of which he is the majority shareholder and where he possesses an unlimited‑term residence permit.
On, koji je također turski državljanin, živi u toj zemlji od 1998. i upravlja društvom s ograničenom odgovornosti u kojem ima većinu udjela te posjeduje boravišnu dozvolu neograničenog trajanja.
In January 2012, the German embassy in Ankara refused again to grant Mrs Dogan a visa for the purpose of family reunification, on the ground that she does not possess the necessary linguistic knowledge.
U siječnju 2012. njemačko je veleposlanstvo u Ankari još jednom odbilo izdati N. Dogan vizu na temelju spajanja obitelji jer nije imala potrebno znanje jezika.
Mrs Dogan therefore brought an action before the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Administrative Court, Berlin, Germany).
N. Dogan podnijela je tužbu pred Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (berlinski upravni sud, Njemačka).
That court asks the Court of Justice whether the language requirement imposed by Germany since 2007 is compatible with European Union law and, in particular, with the ‘standstill’ clause agreed at the beginning of the 1970s in the context of the Association Agreement with Turkey.
Taj sud postavio je Sudu pitanje o tome je li jezični uvjet koji od 2007. traži Njemačka u skladu s pravom Unije i osobito s klauzulom mirovanja ( standstill ) koja je ugovorena početkom 1970-ih u okviru Sporazuma o pridruživanju s Turskom 1 .
Such a language requirement makes family reunification more difficult by tightening, in relation to the rules applicable when the ‘standstill’ clause entered into force, the conditions of the first admission to the territory of the Member State concerned of the spouse of a Turkish national.
Naime, takav jezični uvjet otežava spajanje obitelji postrožujući uvjete za prvi ulazak supružnika turskih državljana na državno područje dotične države članice u odnosu na uvjete koji su bili primjenjivi do stupanja na snagu klauzule mirovanja.
Such legislation constitutes, within the meaning of that clause, a new restriction of the exercise of the freedom of establishment by Turkish nationals.
Takav propis u smislu navedene klauzule predstavlja novo ograničenje slobode poslovnog nastana turskih državljana.
The Court notes that family reunification constitutes an essential way of making possible the family life of Turkish workers who belong to the labour force of the Member States, and contributes both to improving the quality of their stay and to their integration in those Member States.
Sud podsjeća da je spajanje obitelji nužno za omogućivanje obiteljskog života turskih radnika koji sudjeluju na tržištu rada država članica te da pridonosi poboljšanju kvalitete njihova boravka kao i integraciji u tim državama.
The decision of a Turkish national, such as Mr Dogan, to establish himself in a Member State in order to exercise there a stable economic activity could be negatively affected where the legislation of that Member State makes family reunification difficult or impossible, so that that national could, as the case may be, find himself obliged to choose between his activity in the Member State concerned and his family life in Turkey.
Naime, na odluku turskog državljanina da se poslovno nastani u državi članici kako bi stabilno obavljao ekonomsku aktivnost moglo bi negativno utjecati to da zakonodavstvo države članice otežava ili onemogućuje spajanje obitelji na način da bi se navedeni državljanin mogao smatrati obveznim odabrati između aktivnosti u dotičnoj državi članici i obiteljskog života u Turskoj.
Finally, although the introduction of a new restriction may be allowed in so far as it is justified by an overriding reason in the public interest, is suitable to achieve the legitimate objective pursued and does not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain it, the Court considers that such conditions are not satisfied in the present case.
Naposljetku, iako bi se novo ograničenje moglo uvesti ako bi to bilo opravdano važnim razlogom u općem interesu, i ako bi se njime jamčilo ostvarenje legitimnog cilja i ako ono ne bi prelazilo ono što je nužno za njegovo ostvarenje, Sud smatra da ti uvjeti u ovom slučaju nisu ispunjeni.
In that regard, the Court holds that, on the assumption that the grounds set out by the German Government (namely the prevention of forced marriages and the promotion of integration) can constitute overriding reasons in the public interest, it remains the case that a national provision such as the language requirement at issue goes beyond what is necessary in order to attain the objective pursued, in so far as the absence of evidence of sufficient linguistic knowledge automatically leads to the dismissal of the application for family reunification, without account being taken of the specific circumstances of each case.
U tom pogledu Sud ističe da, pod pretpostavkom da se razlozi koje navodi njemačka vlada, to jest sprečavanje prisilnih brakova i promicanje integracije, mogu smatrati važnim razlozima u općem interesu, ostaje činjenica da nacionalna odredba poput ove koja se odnosi na jezik, prelazi ono što je nužno za postizanje cilja, u mjeri u kojoj izostanak dokaza o dovoljnom poznavanju jezika automatski dovodi do odbijanja zahtjeva za spajanje obitelji, bez uzimanja u obzir posebnih okolnosti svakog slučaja .
Pictures of the delivery of the judgment are available from " Europe by Satellite " (+32) 2 2964106
Snimke objave presude nalaze se na "Europe by Satellite " (+32) 2 2964106
18).
3.).
That prohibition is to be assessed by reference to the restrictions existing at the time of the entry into force of the clause for the Member State concerned (1 January 1973 in the case of Germany).
Ta se zabrana ocjenjuje u odnosu na ograničenja koja su postojala u trenutku stupanja klauzule na snagu za dotičnu državu članicu (1. siječnja 1973. u slučaju Njemačke)..
Judgment in Case C‑391/13 P
Presuda u predmetu C-391/13P
Greece v Commission
Grčka/Komisija
The Court confirms the withdrawal from Greece of more than €250 million because of recurrent deficiencies in the sectors of aid for olive oil and for arable crops
Sud potvrđuje uskratu više od 250 milijuna eura Grčkoj zbog učestalih propusta u području potpora za maslinovo ulje i ratarske usjeve
Greece has not completed the geographical information system for olive cultivation or the land parcel identification system
Grčka nije dovršila geografski informacijski sustav za maslinarstvo ni sustav za identifikaciju poljoprivrednih čestica
Under the rules governing the financing of the common agricultural policy (CAP), 1 the Commission may exclude from EU financing any expenditure that has not been effected in compliance with the rules in force.
Sukladno pravilima o financiranju zajedničke poljoprivredne politike (ZPP) 1 , Komisija može isključiti iz financiranja Unije sve izdatke koji nisu učinjeni u skladu s važećim odredbama.
In those circumstances, it is the task of the Commission to evaluate the amounts to be excluded in the light of the nature and gravity of the infringement and of the financial loss suffered by the EU.
U tom je slučaju na njoj da procijeni iznose koje treba isključiti iz financiranja, uzimajući u obzir prirodu i težinu povrede te financijsku štetu prouzročenu Uniji.
In 2007, inspectors from the Commission carried out two investigations in Greece, which revealed deficiencies in the checks carried out by the national authorities.
Tijekom 2007. inspektori Komisije proveli su u Grčkoj dvije istrage kojima je utvrđeno postojanje propusta u kontrolama nacionalnih tijela.
In the first place, with regard to aid for olive oil , the Commission found that there were such significant deficiencies 2 in the geographical information system for olive cultivation (‘olive cultivation GIS’) , used in Greece for checking aid for olive-oil production, that that system had to be regarded as not having been completed in time for the 2003/2004 marketing year (the period from which the declarations of cultivation were to be checked by means of the olive cultivation GIS).
Kada je riječ, kao prvo, o potporama za maslinovo ulje , Komisija je utvrdila da geografski informacijski sustav za maslinarstvo („GIS za maslinarstvo“), koji se u Grčkoj koristi za kontrolu potpora za proizvodnju maslinovog ulja, sadrži tako velike nedostatke 2 da ga se ne može smatrati dovršenim na vrijeme za tržišnu godinu 2003./2004. (razdoblje od kojega se deklaracije o uzgoju trebaju kontrolirati pomoću GIS-a za maslinarstvo).
In addition, the Commission found that the obligation to update the olive cultivation GIS had also not been complied with for the 2004/2005 marketing year.
Osim toga, Komisija je istaknula da ni obveza ažuriranja GIS-a za maslinarstvo za tržišnu godinu 2004./2005. nije bila ispoštovana.
€3 701 088.51 in respect of expenditure after the expiry of the period set in connection with the establishment of the olive cultivation GIS
3 701 088,51 eura za nepravovremene izdatke u okviru uspostavljanja GIS-a za maslinarstvo;
€122 425 959.66 in respect of direct aid for arable crops (2007 declarations)
122 425 959,66 eura za izravne potpore za ratarske usjeve (deklaracije iz 2007.).
The General Court confirmed that the control system applied in Greece had resulted in repeated failures and that that Member State, which had committed similar infringements, was a repeat offender.
Opći je sud potvrdio da sustav kontrole primijenjen u Grčkoj pokazuje stalne nedostatke te da je Grčka – koja je već počinila slične povrede – u situaciji recidiva.
The General Court also found that the Commission had not infringed the principle of proportionality.
Opći je sud također ustvrdio da Komisija nije povrijedila načelo proporcionalnosti.
The Commission, was justified in excluding from financing works which had been completed after the expiry of the period set, since Greece had not established that those works had in fact been completed in good time.
Naime, Komisija je imala pravo iz financiranja isključiti radove dovršene nakon roka, a s obzirom na to da Grčka nije dokazala da su radovi uistinu dovršeni pravodobno.
Greece then brought an appeal before the Court of Justice.
Nakon toga je Grčka podnijela žalbu Sudu.
It criticises the General Court for having upheld the flat-rate corrections of 15% applied, on account of recidivism, to expenditure incurred in the olive oil sector for the 2004/2005 marketing year and to expenditure incurred under the system of direct aid for arable crops in respect of the 2007 declarations.
Općem je sudu predbacila da je potvrdio korekcije – izrečene zbog ponavljanja povreda − u paušalnom iznosu od 15 %, kako na izdacima u sektoru proizvodnje maslinovog ulja tijekom tržišne godine 2004./2005. tako i na izdacima za izravne potpore za ratarske usjeve za deklaracije iz 2007.
In today’s judgment, the Court finds that Greece is in fact seeking to call into question the factual assessments made by the General Court for the purpose of establishing whether the Greek control system in respect of olive oil production presented repeated failures and whether the conditions for increasing the financial correction on account of recidivism were satisfied.
Sud je svojom današnjom presudom utvrdio da Grčka zapravo želi dovesti u pitanje činjenične ocjene Općeg suda kojima se utvrđuje sadrži li grčki sustav kontrole proizvodnje maslinovog ulja učestale nedostatke i jesu li ispunjeni uvjeti za uvećavanje korekcije zbog ponavljanja povrede.
The Court observes that that type of factual appraisal is not permitted in an appeal.
Sud je mišljenja da činjenično preispitivanje takve vrste nije dopušteno u okviru žalbe.
Moreover, the Court holds that the General Court took due account of the considerations and evidence submitted by Greece with a view to establishing that the control systems had improved and that the olive cultivation GIS operated in a more efficient manner.
Osim toga, Sud ističe da je Opći sud valjano vodio računa o argumentima i dokazima koje mu je podnijela Grčka radi dokazivanja da su se sustavi kontrole poboljšali i da GIS za maslinarstvo funkcionira na učinkovitiji način.
The Court therefore confirms that the General Court, in the exercise of its exclusive jurisdiction to determine and assess the facts, concluded correctly that the Commission had not made a manifest error in the assessment of the recurrent nature of the deficiencies and that it was fully entitled to increase the financial correction rate from 10% to 15%.
Sud dakle potvrđuje da je Opći sud, izvršavajući svoju isključivu ovlast utvrđivanja i ocjene činjenica, ispravno zaključio da Komisija nije počinila očitu pogrešku prilikom procjene ponavljanja nedostataka te da je ispravno uvećao stopu financijske korekcije s 10 na 15 %.
By contrast, Greece has not established that the General Court infringed the principle of proportionality by applying the correction rate set out in the guidelines 6 on the new CAP.
Naprotiv, Grčka nije dokazala da je Opći sud povrijedio načelo proporcionalnosti time što je primijenio stopu korekcije iz Smjernica 6 o novom ZPP-u.
In consequence, the Court dismisses the appeal brought by Greece and upholds both the judgment of the General Court and the decision of the Commission.
U skladu s navedenim, Sud je odbio žalbu Grčke i potvrdio presudu Općeg suda kao i odluku Komisije.
NOTE: An appeal, on a point or points of law only, may be brought before the Court of Justice against a judgment or order of the General Court.
NAPOMENA: Protiv odluke Općeg suda, Sudu se može podnijeti žalba ograničena na pravna pitanja.
In principle, the appeal does not have suspensive effect.
Žalba, u načelu nema suspenzivni učinak.
If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the General Court.
Ako je dopuštena i osnovana, Sud ukida odluku Općeg suda.
Where the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court of Justice may itself give final judgment in the case.
Ako je u predmetu moguće presuditi, Sud ga može i sam riješiti.
Otherwise, it refers the case back to the General Court, which is bound by the decision given by the Court of Justice on the appeal.
U suprotnom, predmet se vraća Općem sudu koji je vezan odlukom Suda donesenom povodom žalbe .
103) (applicable to expenditure effected as from 1 January 2000).
103.) (koja se primjenjuje na izdatke učinjene nakon 1. siječnja 2000.)
In order to constitute the olive cultivation GIS, Greece combined the orthophotographs from the 1997/1998 marketing year with declarations of cultivation made specifically for the constitution of the olive cultivation GIS during the 2002/2003 marketing year.
U cilju konstituiranja GIS-a za maslinarstvo Grčka je kombinirala ortofotografije iz tržišne godine 1997./1998. s deklaracijama kultura ispunjenih u specifičnu svrhu uspostavljanja GIS-a za maslinarstvo tijekom tržišne godine 2002./2003.
Those declarations did not, however, form the subject-matter of cross-checks against the declarations under the previous system, filed for the 2002/2003 marketing year, with the result that significant differences were found between the two data sources.
Te deklaracije nisu međutim bile predmetom verifikacija usporedbom s deklaracijama iz bivšeg sustava koje su predane za godinu 2002./2003., tako da su utvrđena velika odstupanja između ta dva izvora podataka.
Commission Implementing Decision 2011/244/EU of 15 April 2011 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 102, p.
Provedbena odluka Komisije 2011/244/EU od 15. travnja 2011. o isključenju iz financiranja Europske unije određenih izdataka nastalih za države članice u okviru Komponente za jamstva Europskog fonda za smjernice i jamstva u poljoprivredi (EFSJP), u okviru Europskog fonda za jamstva u poljoprivredi (EFJP) i Europskog poljoprivrednog fonda za ruralni razvoj (EPFRR) (SL L 102, str.
33).
33.).
Judgment in Case C‑421/13
Presuda u predmetu C-421/13
Apple Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
Apple Inc. / Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
The representation of the layout of a retail store, such as an ‘Apple’ flagship store, may, subject to certain conditions, be registered as a trade mark
Prikaz uređenja prodajnog prostora kao što je onaj glavne prodavaonice Apple može pod određenim uvjetima biti registriran kao žig
Such a representation must be capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings
Takav prikaz mora biti prikladan za razlikovanje proizvoda ili usluga jednog poduzetnika od onih drugog poduzetnika
In 2010, Apple registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office a three-dimensional trade mark consisting of the representation, by a multicoloured design, of its flagship stores.
Apple je 2010. registrirao kod United States Patent and Trademark Officea (Ured za patente i žigove SAD-a) trodimenzionalni žig koji se sastojao od višebojnog prikaza crteža njegovih glavnih prodavaonica ( flagship stores ).
That trade mark was registered for ‘retail store services featuring computers, computer software, computer peripherals, mobile phones, consumer electronics and related accessories and demonstrations of products relating thereto’.
Taj je žig registriran za „usluge maloprodaje koje se odnose na računala, računalne programe, periferne računalne uređaje, prenosive telefone, elektroničke uređaje za široku potrošnju i dodatke te demonstraciju s njima povezanih proizvoda“.
That representation took the following form:
Taj je prikaz izgledao ovako:
Apple subsequently sought to extend that trade mark internationally.
Apple je zatim želio proširiti zaštitu tog žiga na međunarodnoj razini.
Apple brought an appeal against that decision before the Bundespatentgericht (Federal Patents Court, Germany).
Apple je podnio žalbu protiv te odluke Bundespatentgerichtu (Savezni sud za patente, Njemačka).
In today’s judgment, the Court notes first of all that, in order to be capable of constituting a trade mark, the subject-matter of the application for registration must, in accordance with the trade marks directive, 1 satisfy three conditions, namely, that it must (1) constitute a sign, (2) be capable of graphic representation and (3) be capable of distinguishing the ‘goods’ or ‘services’ of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.
Svojom današnjom presudom Sud najprije podsjeća da kako bi mogao sačinjavati žig, predmet prijave za registraciju treba ispuniti tri uvjeta u skladu s Direktivom o žigovima 1 , to jest treba se raditi o znaku , mora se moći grafički prikazati i biti prikladan za razlikovanje „proizvoda“ ili „usluga“ jednog poduzetnika od onih drugog poduzetnika.
That could be the case where the depicted layout departs significantly from the norm or customs of the economic sector concerned.
To bi bio slučaj kada bi se prikazano uređenje značajno razlikovalo od normi ili običaja predmetnoga gospodarskog sektora.
The Court emphasises, however, that the fact that a sign is generally capable of constituting a trade mark does not imply that the sign necessarily possesses a distinctive character within the meaning of the directive.
Sud stoga ističe da općenita sposobnost znaka da može činiti žig ne znači da taj znak nužno ima razlikovni karakter u smislu direktive.
It is also by a case-by-case assessment that the competent authority must determine whether the sign is descriptive of the characteristics of the goods or services concerned, or whether it gives rise to one of the other grounds for refusing the registration laid down in the directive.
Nadležno tijelo također treba utvrditi ispitivanjem od slučaja do slučaja je li znak opisan ili nije u odnosu na obilježja predmetnih proizvoda ili usluga te sadrži li neki od drugih razloga za odbijanje registracije navedenih u direktivi.
The Court holds that, as regards a design representing the layout of a retail store, the assessment criteria that the competent authority must apply do not differ from those used for other types of sign.
Sud utvrđuje da u pogledu crteža koji prikazuje uređenje prodajnog prostora kriteriji ocjene koje nadležno tijelo treba slijediti nisu različiti od onih koji se koriste za druge vrste znakova.
Services which, like those mentioned in Apple’s application, consist, for example, of carrying out, in such stores, demonstrations of the products by means of seminars may in themselves constitute remunerated services falling within the concept of ‘service’.
Usluge koje se kao one spomenute u Appleovoj prijavi sastoje na primjer od pokazivanja proizvoda u tim prodavaonicama na seminarima mogu same za sebe činiti naplatne usluge koje spadaju pod pojam „usluge“.
Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 2008 L 299, p.
Direktiva 2008/95/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. listopada 2008. o usklađivanju zakonodavstava država članica o žigovima (SL L 299, str.
25).
149.).
Judgment in Joined Cases C‑ 358/13 and C-181/14
Presuda u spojenim predmetima C-358/13 i C-181/14
D. and G.
D. i G.
Mixtures of herbs containing synthetic cannabinoids consumed as a marijuana substitute are not medicinal products
Mješavine aromatičnog bilja koje sadrže sintetske kanabinoide i konzumiraju se kao zamjena za marihuanu nisu lijekovi
At the material time, synthetic cannabinoids did not fall under the German law on narcotic drugs, so that the German authorities were unable to instigate criminal law proceedings on the basis of that law.
U vrijeme činjeničnog stanja u glavnom postupku sintetski kanabinoidi nisu bili obuhvaćeni njemačkim zakonom o narkoticima, tako da njemačka tijela nisu mogla pokrenuti kaznene postupke na temelju tog zakona.
The consumption of the synthetic cannabinoids in question generally induces a state of intoxication which may range from intense excitement to hallucinations.
Konzumacija sintetskih kanabinoida u pitanju općenito uzrokuje stanje opijenosti koje može prerasti u halucinacije.
They may also cause nausea, intense vomiting, heart-racing, disorientation, delusions and even cardiac arrest.
Također može uzrokovati mučnine, jako povraćanje, tahikardiju i dezorijentiranost, delirij odnosno kardiocirkulatorni zastoj.
The synthetic cannabinoids have been tested by the pharmaceutical industry in pre-experimental studies.
Te sintetske kanabinoide farmaceutska industrija testirala je u okviru predeksperimentalnih studija.
The series of tests were discontinued at the first experimental/pharmacological stage: it was apparent that the desired health effects of those substances could not be achieved and considerable side effects were foreseeable due to the psychoactive effects of the substances.
Niz testova prekinut je u prvoj farmakološkoj eksperimentalnoj fazi: nije bilo moguće postići željene učinke tih tvari na zdravlje i mogle su se predvidjeti znatne popratne pojave zbog njihovih psihoaktivnih svojstava.
The Court observes that, according to the Bundesgerichtshof, the mixtures in question are consumed not for therapeutic but for purely recreational purposes and that they are, as such, harmful to human health.
Sud ističe da se, prema Bundesgerichtshofu, sporne mješavine konzumiraju u svrhe koje nisu terapeutske nego strogo rekreativne i koje su kao takve štetne za zdravlje ljudi.
The fact that that conclusion may mean that the marketing of the substances at issue is not subject to any criminal law sanction cannot call the Court’s finding into question.
Činjenica da bi ovaj zaključak za posljedicu mogao imati onemogućivanje svakog kaznenog progona stavljanja u promet tvari u pitanju ne može dovesti u pitanje ocjenu Suda.