natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zrinka Odrčić, who became Head of the Safety at Work and Environment Department on 1/12/2006, and who, knowing that "CO2 is the primary source of danger in the work of a brewery", in spite of the obligation from the Article 23
Zrinke Odrčić, koja je od 1.12.2006. postala rukovoditelj Odjela sigurnosti zaštite na radu i okoliša, te koja, znajući da je „CO2 prvi izvor opasnosti u radu pivovare“, usprkos obveze iz članka 23.
Of the Safety at work Act, which provides that carrying out internal supervision over implementation of the Rules of safety at work, did not carry out a single activity of supervision.." (all page 42), and for the V def.
Zakona o zaštiti na radu, kojom je propisano provođenje unutarnjeg nadzora nad primjenom Pravila zaštite na radu, nije poduzela niti jednu radnju tog nadzora....“ (sve str.42), a i za V okr.
of the Safety at Work Act, i.e. by omitting to act according to taken obligations, he agreed to occurrence of any consequence which could derive from his omission (page 43).
Zakona o zaštiti na radu tj. propuštanjem da postupi prema preuzetim obvezama, pristao na nastup svake posljedice koja iz njegovaog propusta može nastupiti (str.43).
Court rejected the defences of I to V def. and representative of the legal entity "Karlovačka pivovara" in the part where they decline any responsibility for the occurrence of the harmful consequence... (page 45).
Sud nije prihvatio obrane I do V okr. te predstavnice pravne osobe „Karlovačke pivovare“ u onom dijelu gdje otklanjaju bilo kakvu odgovornost za nastup štetne posljedice......(str.45).
of the Safety at work Act, Ordinance on internal organisation and systematisation of work posts in Karlovačka pivovara and Employment contracts with "Karlovačka pivovara") all in positions stated in the judgement disposition, and III def. Zrinka Odrčić, also, based on Art. 23
Zakona o zaštiti na radu, Pravilnika o unutarnjoj organizaciji i sistematizaciji radnih mjesta u „Karlovačkoj pivovari“ i Ugovora o radu s „Karlovačkom pivovarom“) svi u svojstvima naznačenim u izreci presude, a III okr.Zrinka Odrčić i temeljem čl.23.
Of the Safety at work Act, and omitted, after 25 November 2006 to carry out a revision of the danger assesment due to changed technology of operations, and contrary to provision of Article 12 and 13
Zakona o zaštiti na radu, te propustili, nakon 25. studenog 2006.g. izvršiti reviziju procjene opasnostu zbog izmijenjene tehnologije rada, a protivno odredbi članka 12. i 13.
Of the Safety at Work Act, have all agreed to the consequences which could occur from their omission to act, due to this omission of I-V defendants on 23 February 2007, outside the factory premises, at the gorge of the Pivarski creek the level of oxygen in the air was decreased, and Zdravko Martinović, who walked with his dog along the Pivarski creek, lost consciousness and remained laying down, and later on died from hypoxic suffocation on 19 March 2007 in the General Hospital in Karlovac, and by that the court determined that I to V def. as responsible persons did not act according to the regulations and technical rules on protection measures and by that caused peril for the life and body of people causing the death of one person (al pages 46) and the very omission of I to V def. caused the occurrence of the dangerous situation in the area of Pivarski creek and surrounding area, and consequently to health impairment and death the injured Zdravko Martinović, which is confirmed by the records of on-site investigation from 3.3.2007.
Zakona o zaštiti na radu, svi pristali na sve posljedice koje usljed njihovih propusta mogu nastupiti, zbog kojih propusta I do V okrivljenih je dana 23. veljače 2007., izvan kruga tvornice, u usjeku Pivarskog potoka bila smanjena koncentracijak kisika u zraku, pa je Zdravko Martinović, koji je s psom šetao uz Pivarski potok, izgubio svijest i ostao ležati, a potom 19. ožujka 2007.g. od posljedica hipoksičnog gušenja umro u Općoj bolnici u Karlovcu, pa je time, sud utvrdio da I do V okr. kao odgovorne osobe nisu postupali po propisma i tehničkim pravilima o zaštitnim mjerama te su time izazvali opasnost za život i tijelo ljudi uslijed čega je prouzročena smrt jedne osobe (sve str.46) pa da je upravo propustima I do V okr. došlo do stvaranja opasne situacije na području Pivarskog potoka i okolnog područja, te da je stoga došlo do oštećenja zdravlja i smrti oštećenog Zdravka Martinovića, a što potvrđuje i zapisnik o očevidu od 3.3.2007.g.
(pages 480-482 of the file), statement of witness Čepelak on oxygen concentration at the outlet of precipitation sewage into the Pivarski creek (page 47) so, the court found that I to V def. as responsible persons, due to their omissions and inactivity, caused the occurrence of such harmful consequence, and that they acted with the form of culpability identified as indirect intention because:
(list 480-482 spisa), iskaz svjedoka Čepelaka o koncentraciji kisika na ispustu oborinske kanalizacije u Pivarski potok (str.47) pa je sud utvrdio da su upravo I do V okr., kao odgovorne osobe, zbog svih svojih propusta i nečinjenja, izazvali nastup ovakve štetne posljedice, te da su postupali s oblikom krivnje koji se naziva neizravna namjera jer:
"I, II, IV and V defendants neither as authorised persons by employers for the area of safety at work, did not carry out a single check in order to determine where the impure CO2 drainage pipe is located and ends, to which 26/11/2006 the total quantity of produced CO2 in the process of fermentation was directed, nor did they ensure alternative safe way to dispose CO2 before the CO2 liquification installation removal" (page 47), and that in spite of the CO2 liquification installation was removed, the production (beer) was continued by which the complete daily production of CO2 was poured into the sewage system, more correctly to the channel for precipitation and waste waters drainage, outside of the factory premises to Pivarski creek (Grabica Creek) where on 23 February 2007, due to the release of a large quantity of CO2 in the gorge of the creek, health impairment and later on death of Zdravko Martinović occurred.
„ I, II i IV i V okrivljenici ni kao ovlaštenici poslodavca za područje zaštite na radu nisu izvršili niti jednu provjeru da bi utvrdili gdje se nalazi i gdje završava cijev za odvodnju nečistog CO2 u koju je od 26.11.2006.g. odlazio sveukupno proizveden CO2 u pogonu fermentacije niti su osigurali da se na drugi način sigurno zbrine CO2 prije izmiještanja stroja za ukapljivanje CO2“ (str.47), te da je unatoč izmiještanju stroja za ukapljivanje CO2, proizvodnja (pive) nastavljena čime je cjelokupno dnevno proizvedna količina CO2 istjecala u kanalizacijski sustav, točnije kanal za odvodnju oborinskih i otpadnih voda van kruga tvornice do Pivarskog potoka (potoka Grabica) gdje je dana 23. veljače 2007 godine zbog ispuštanja velike količine CO2 u usjeku potoka, došlo do oštećenja zdravlja i kasnije smrti Zdravka Martinovića.
And by agreeing to the continuation of production, with no checks of the CO2, being the primary source of danger in brewery production and harmful for life and health of people, is no longer being liquified, I to V def. agreed to the occurrence of any harmful consequence that may arise due to their omissions and with such behaviour, I to V def., as responsible persons, the Court identifies al subjective and objective characteristics of the criminal offence from the Article 271 paragraph 2.
Te je upravo takvim pristajanjem na nastavak proizvodnje, bez ikakve provjere što se CO2, koji je prvi izvor opasnosti u radu pivovare i štetan za život i zdravlje ljudi, više ne ukapljuje, I do V okr. pristali na nastup svake štetne posljedice koja može nastupiti zbog njihovih propusta pa je u tako utvrđenom ponašanju, I do V okr., kao odgovornih osoba, sud utvrdio sva subjektiva i objektivna obilježja kaznenog djela iz članka 271. stavak 2.
of CC and the Court for this crime found them guilty (al page 48)
KZ te ih je sud za to djelo proglasio krivim (sve str.48).
Karlovac, the Court states that it is undoubtedly determined that I to V def., as responsible persons in Karlovačka pivovara, in position from the deposition of judgement, omitted to act in accordance with regulations and technical rules on protection measures and thus caused danger for life and body of people which led to the death of one person (page 48), and:
Karlovac, sud navodi da je nedvojbeno utvrđeno da su I do V okr., kao odgovorne osobe Karlovačke pivovare, u svojstvu iz izreke presude, propustili postupati po propisima i tehničkim pravilima o zaštitnim mjerama i time izazvali opasnost za život i tijelo ljudi usljed čega je prouzročena smrt jedne osobe (str.48), te :
"the employer "Karlovačka pivovara" according to the Article 44 paragraph 1
„poslodavac „Karlovačka pivovara“ prema članku 44. stavak 1.
Of the Safety at Work Act has a duty to plan, prepare and carry out the work process in a way that will ensure protection of workers and effective protection of the environment, which in concrete case was not done.. equally so, it has been undeniably determined in the proceedings that the employer Karlovačka pivovara acted contrary to the provision of Article 43 paragraph 2
Zakona o zaštiti na radu ima dužnost takvog planiranja, pripremanja i provođenja procesa rada kojom će se osigurati zaštita radnika i djelotvorno zaštita okoliša a što u konkretnom slučaju nije učinjeno....jednako tako nesporno je u postupku utvrđeno da je poslodavac Karlovačka pivovara postupila protivno odredbi članka 43. stavak 2.
Of the Safety at Work Act, because it did not ensure that the equipment is in good condition at all times... according to the Article 23 paragraph 1 lines 2 and 3
Zakona o zaštiti na radu jer nije osigurala da sredstva rada u svakom trenutku budu u ispravnom stanju....prema članku 23. stavak 1. alineja 2. i 3.
During the proceeding it has been determined that the employer Karlovačka pivovara omitted to act according to this legal obligation..
Tijekom postupka je utvrđeno da je poslodavac Karlovačka pivovara propustila postupiti po ovoj propisanoj zakonskoj obvezi .....
from the findings and opinions of the safety at work expert Ana Šijaković Bsc., it is clear that in the Danger assessment of the Karlovačka pivovara, as the basic act of the employer in the area of safety at work, changes of technology of safe disposal of CO2 were not elaborated, given the fact that the CO2 liquification device was removed and following these changes of the technological process, informed the company who drafted this act.
iz nalaza i mišljenja vještaka zaštite na radu dipl.ing.sig.Ane Šijaković proizlazi da u Procjeni opasnosti Karlovačke pivovare, kao temeljnom aktu poslodavca iz područja zaštite na radu, nisu razrađene promjene tehnologije sigurnog zbrinjavanja CO2 s obzirom na činjenicu da je uklonjen uređaj za ukapljivanje CO2 i nisu sljedom tih izmjena tehnološkog procesa, obavijestile tvrtku koja je izrađivala taj akt.
Consequently, on 23 February 2007, danger occurred for the life of people causing the death of one person...
Zbog toga je dana 23. veljače 2007. nastupila opasnost za život ljudi usljed čega je jedna osoba smrtno stradala....
Provided by Article 3
Odredbom članka 3.
Legal entity will be punished for criminal offences provided by the Criminal Code and other Codes which regulate criminal offences...
Pravna osoba kaznit će se za kaznena djela propisana kaznenim zakonikom i drugim zakonima u kojima su propisana kaznena djela.....
criminal offences of responsible persons in this concrete case the obligation of "Karlovačka pivovara" is violated to organise its work in a way to ensure effective protection of the environment... provision of Article 5.
kazenim djelima odgovornih osoba u ovom konkretnom slučaju povrijeđena je obveza „Karlovačke pivovare da svoj rad organizira na način da se osigura djelotvorna zaštita okoliša.....odredbom članka 5.
"the Court found that the responsible persons of the Company "Karlovačka pivovara" , namely, I, II, III, IV and V def. were found guilty, therefore, the legal entity Karlovačka pivovara was found guilty for committing the criminal offence from Article 271 paragraph 2
„sud našao utvrđenim da su odgovorne osobe trgovačkog društva „Karlovačka pivovara“ i to I, II, III, IV i V okr., proglašeni krivima to je i pravna osoba Karlovačka pivovara proglašena krivom da je počinila kazneno djelo iz članka 271. stavak 2.
of ALLECO" (all page 49)
ZOPOKD“ (sve str.49).
(page 50 and 51), and for the VI defendant Company "Karlovačka pivovara" d.o.o. the Court appreciated the information of competent authorities on assets and equity of the company, so for the criminal offence from Article 271 paragraph 2
(str.50. i 51.), a za VI okrivljenu TD „Karlovačka pivovara“ d.o.o. sud je cijenio podatke nadležnih tijela o imovini i temeljnom kapitalu društva, pa je za kazneno djelo iz članka 271. stavak 2.
of ALLECO, VI def.
ZOPOKD, VI okr.
of ALLECO in accordance with Article 52 paragraph 1
ZOPOKD-a u vezi članka 52. stavak 1.
of the CC the accused legal entity is to pay the fine in the period of 3 months after legal validity of this judgement,... the Court deems that with such a fine to which the legal entity "Karlovačka pivovara" is sentenced will adequately influence this legal entity and other legal entities in order to respect the legislative of this country and ensure that their authorised persons work in accordanc with legislation in power, respecting their work duties" (all page 51 of the judgement).
KZ okrivljena pravna osoba dužna je novčanu kaznu platiti u roku od 3 mjeseca od pravomoćnosti presude,......sud smatra da će se ovakvom novčanom kaznom na koju je osuđena pravna osoba „Karlovačka pivavara“ u dovoljnoj mjeri utjecati kako na tu pravnu osobu tako i druge pravne osobe da poštuju pravni poredak ove zemlje i osiguraju da njihove ovlaštene osobe rade u skladu sa važećim zakonskim odrebama poštujući svoje radne obveze“ (sve str.51 presude).
02/2007; the entire medical documentation of the General Hospital in Karlovac (I.13.-15. of the file) it is clear that as the cause of the event on 23/02/2007 ammonia was identified.
02.2007.g.; cjelokupne liječničke dokumentacije Opće bolnice Karlovac (l.13.-15. spisa) proizlazi da je kao uzrok događaja od 23.02.2007.g. naznačen amonijak.
unusually high level of ammonium was found in the blood and that in the course of his carrier:
„neuobičajeno visoki postotak amonijaka u krvi, te da se on tijekom svoga rada:
"he has not met with such a clinical picture of the state", and that they, in spite of all efforts made could not establish a causal link for his state.
„sa ovakvom slikom sveukupnog stanja nije sreo“, te da oni, unatoč svih nastojanja nisu mogli uspostaviti niti otkriti uzročno-posljedičnu vezu njegovog stanja.
"it was simply not clear to him what was the fact in this concrete case" (I.30. of the file).
„ jednostavno nije bilo jasno o čemu se u konkretnom slučaju radi“ (l.30. spisa).
32 of the file there is a statement of the witness
32. spisa nalazi se iskaz svjedokinje dr.
"said with full responsibility that there is no patient with ammonium poisoning and that
„ sasvim odgovorno rekla da nema pacijenta koji ima trovanje amonijakom te da:
"the cause is unknown, so .. biological blood samples, urin samples, stomach content should be kept for later toxicological analysis".
„ ima očito nepoznati uzrok, pa da.. treba uzeti biološke uzroke krvi, urina, želučanog sadržaja i sačuvati za kasniju toksikološku analizu „.
Intoxicatio cum NH3 (p. 34 -50, p.88, p.97-99 of the file).
Intoxicatio cum NH3 (l.34.-50., l.88., l.97.-99. spisa).
Only the toxicologists opinion of the case of possible poisoning of Mr.
Tek toksikološko mišljenje o slučaju mogućeg otrovanja g.
Zdravko Martinović (p.129 of the file) of the Croatian Institute for Toxicology from 28/02/2007
Zdravka Martinovića (l.129.spisa) Hrvatskog zavoda za toksikologiju od 28.02.2007.g.
excludes the possibility of ammonium poisoning, and the opinion on meteorological conditions at the day of the incident with carbon dioxide compiled by the Director of the same Institute prof.dr.
isključuje mogućnost otrovanja amonijakom, a mišljenje o meteorološkom uvjetima na dan incidenta s ugljikovim dioksidom ravnatelja istog Zavoda prof.dr.
(p 130, 410 of the file) speaks that:
(l.130.;410. spisa) govori o tome da su se:
"all conditions were met for an accident at the day in question based on the data of Meteorological and Hydrological Service from 02/03/2007
„ stekli svi uvjeti za nesreću rečenog dana na temelju podataka Državnog hidrometeorološkog zavoda od 02.03.2007.g.
(p. 412- 416 of the file)
(l.412.-416 spisa).
Medical documentation of the General Hospital in Karlovac on six examined patients in ER, especially Curman Kata (I.247-254 of the file) indicates Intoxicatio hum NH3
Liječnička dokumentacija Opće bolnice Karlovac o šest pregledanih pacijenata u HIA, a osobito Curman Kate (l.247.-254.spisa) ukazuje na Intoxicatio cum NH3 .
of the CC and in decision exposition it is pointed out that the contract between Karlovačka pivovara and Frigoterma d.o.o. from Sesvetski Kraljevec on construction works for the reconstruction of the cooling section, points out the letter of the director of the Croatian institute for toxicology prof. dr. Franjo Plavšić (p. 129 of the file) and the witness statement of Rajka Turk Msc on exclusion of ammonium as the cause of the accident.
KZ-a a u obrazloženju rješenja ukazuje se na ugovor između „Karlovačke pivovare“ i „Frigoterma“ d.o.o. iz Sesvetskog Kraljevca o izvođenju radova na rekonstrukciji rashladnog postrojenja, ukazuje se na dopis ravnatelja Hrvatskog zavoda za toksikologiju prof.dr.Franje Plavšića (l.129 spisa) te iskaz svjedokinje Rajke Turk mr.ph. o isključenju amonijaka kao uzroka nesreće.
Already in the Apeal of the VI def.
Već u žalbi VI okr.
against the decision of the investigation judge of the County Court in Karlovac, number KIO-14/07 from 13 March 2007, the VI def.
protiv rješenja istražne sutkinje Županijskog suda u Karlovcu, broj Kio-14/07 od 13. ožujka 2007.g., VI. okr.
Karlovačka pivovara d.o.o. stated that:
TD „Karlovačka pivovara“ d.o.o., je navela da je:
The disputed decision was unjustified because, based on the documentation which can be found in the file and "by now collected data" there is no reasonable doubt that a causal link existed between (the alleged) leak of carbon dioxide in Pivarski creek and the fact of injury of the injured Martinović; that the witnessing of
Pobijano rješenje neosnovano, jer da na temelju dokumentacije koja se nalazi u spisu i „do sada prikupljenih podataka“ ne proizlazi osnovana sumnja da bi postojala uzročna veza između (navodnog) istjecanja ugljičnog dioksida u Pivarski potok i činjenice stradavanja oštećenika Martinovića; da je svjedočenje mr.ph.
Rajka Turk Msc was extremely useful in the earliest phase of so called emergency investigative activities because from her statement it is clear:
Rajke Turk bilo izuzetno korisno u najranijoj fazi provođenja tzv. hitnih istražnih radnji jer iz njezinog iskaza proizlazi:
"that high levels of ammonium in the blood of the injured found upon the first drawing of blood, were not a sign of ammonium poisoning, ..., therefore
„da to što je nađen visok amonijak u krvi oštećenika i to prilikom prvog vađenja nije znak da je došlo do trovanja amonijakom, ...., dakle, mr.ph.
Franjo Plavšić (in his letter) stated that according to the data of the MHS at the time of the incident the conditions (wind, pressure, humidity) were such that:
Franjo Plavšić (u dopisu) naveo je i to prema podacima iz DHMZ-a da su u vrijeme incidenta uvjeti (vjetar, tlak, vlažnost) bili takvi da su se:
"conditions for the accident were created on the day in question and just for the accident related to CO2 release", so prof.dr.
„stekli uvjeti za nesreću rečenog dana i to upravo nesreću u vezi s ispuštanjem CO2“, pa, niti prof.dr.
Franjo Plavšić was also not the one to determine the cause of the accident from 23 February 2007; Therefore, in the file there are no data that due to release of large quantities of carbon dioxide on 23 February 2007, caused the presence of large quantities of carbon dioxide in the gorge of the creek, decreasing the oxygen levels in the air, and that due to large concentration of carbon dioxide a dog died, and due to low levels of oxygen severe damage and weakening of some organic functions occurred in Zdravko Martinović; it is not determined that the dog died "due to high concentration of carbon dioxide" and especially it was not determined that severe damage and weakening of organic functions of Zdravko martinović were caused by "low oxygen levels"!; therefore, it was proposed to the Panel of the County Court in Karlovac to request an investigation by the MSAO in Karlovac from 08/03/2007, and in relation to VI def., to reject as justified.
Franjo Plavšić nije utvrdio uzroke nesreće od 23. veljače 2007.g.; Dakle, u spisu nema podataka da bi zbog ispuštanja velike količine ugljičnog dioksida, dana 23. veljače 2007.g., došlo do prisutnosti velike količine ugljičnog-dioksida u usjeku potoka, pa da bi time bila smanjena količina kisika u zraku, te da je uslijed visoke koncentracije ugljičnog-dioksida došlo do uginuća psa, te da je zbog niske razine kisika kod Zdravka Martinovića došlo do teškog oštećenja i slabljenja pojedinih organskih funkcija; nije utvrđeno da je do uginuća psa došlo „uslijed visoke koncentracije ugljičnog-dioksida“, a pogotovo nije utvrđeno da bi teška oštećenja i slabljenja pojedinih organskih funkcija Zdravka Martinovića bila posljedicom „niske razine kisika“ !; stoga je predloženo Vijeću Županijskog suda u Karlovcu zahtjev za provođenje istrage ODO-a u Karlovcu od 08. ožujka 2007.g., u odnosu na VI. okr., odbiti kao neosnovan.
On pages 611-613 of the file forensic medicine expertise can be found, made by dr. Josip Škavić and Zdravko Kovačić Bsc who compiled it upon the Court order from 7.3.2007.
Na listu 611-613 spisa nalazi se sudskomedicinsko vještačenje po vještacima dr.Josipu Škaviću i dipl.ing.Zdravku Kovačiću koji su izradili temeljem naloga suda od 7.3.2007.g.
(page 118 of the file), in which experts "responding to questions of the court state that:
(list 118 spisa), u kojem vještaci „odgovarajući na pitanja suda navode da:
The health impairment found in the injured Martinović Zdravko is of such characteristics that it could have occurred as a consequence of carbon dioxide inhalation.
Oštećenje zdravlja utvrđeno kod oštećenika Martinović Zdravka takvih je karakteristika da je moglo nastati kao posljedica udisanja ugljik dioksida,
During on-site investigation performed on 1 and 2 March 2007 on the premises of the Company "Karlovačka pivovara" d.o.o.
Očevidom koji je proveden dana 1. i 2. ožujka 2007. godine u krugu trgovačkog društva „Karlovačka pivovara“ d.d.
Karlovac and at the Pivarski creek it has been determined that from the facilities of the company mentioned carbon dioxide was flowing out through the drainage channels at the Pivarski creek where on 23/2/2007 the injured party Zdravko Martinović was found.
Karlovac i na Pivarskom potpku utvrđeno je da iz pogona navedenog trgovačkog društva ugljični dioksid odvodnim kanalima istječe kod Pivarskog potpka na kojem je mjestu 23.2.2007. godine pronađen oštećenik Zdravko Martinović.
In such circumstances hypoxic suffocation with carbon dioxide could have occurred in the injured party.
U takvim je okolnostima moglo doći do hipoksičnog gušenja oštećenika ugljik dioksidom.
Findings of high concentration of ammonium in blood samples (1333 I. micro mol/L)... is not evidence that the injured Zdravko Martinović had ammonium poisoning".
Nalaz visoke koncentracije amonijaka u krvi (1333 l. mikromola/L)...nije dokaz da je kod oštećenika Zdravka Martinovića došlo do otrovanja amonijakom“.
Of the Pathology department of the Croatian Veterinary Institute from 21/03/2007
Odjela za patologiju Hrvatskog veterinarskog instituta od 21.III 2007.
(page 660-665 of the file), in the opinion it is stated:
(list 660-665 spisa), u mišljenju se navodi:
"based on patomorphological and other laboratory tests we cannot determine the cause of death of the animal in question.
„osnovom provedenih patomorfoloških kao i dodatnih laboratorijskih pretraga nismo u mogućnosti odrediti uzrok uginuća predmetne životinje.