natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the journalist was, upon her request, replied to on the same day in writing, one could expect that this written answer provided by the competent State Attorney Office will be published.
Budući da je novinarki na njen pisani upit istoga dana pisano i odgovoreno, za očekivati je da će i taj pisani odgovor nadležnog državnog odvjetništva biti objavljen.
We deem inappropriate that before a final and binding judgement is passed, in other words the final decision of a higher court acting upon appeal of the State Attorney Office, by publishing the article, evaluation of performance of the Deputy Municipal State Attorney is also published, and qualified as "omission and oversight", because if the journalists who signed the article did not act according to the professional principle "let the other side be heard" and did not include in the article the response to their inquiry which they received, it is appropriate to qualify the actions of the journalists as an omission and oversight to act according to professional rules and principles."
Smatramo neprimjerenim da se prije pravomoćnosti presude, odnosno konačne odluke višeg suda povodom žalbe državnog odvjetništva, objavom teksta ujedno objavljuje i ocjena rada zamjenice općinskog državnog odvjetnika i to kao „propust i gaf“, jer ukoliko potpisane novinarke nisu postupile po profesionalnom načelu „neka se čuje i druga strana“ i nisu u tekstu uvrstile odgovor koje su tražile i dobile, utoliko bi se kao propust i gaf mogao nazvati postupak novinara jer nije pri čitanju i odobravanju teksta za objavu postupio sukladno profesionalnim aktima i načelima.“
CASE FROM SEPTEMBER 2009
PREDMET IZ RUJNA 2009.
In a daily newspaper an article was published written by a journalist titled "A prosecutor from Zagreb "arranged" penalties below the minimum to a dealer couple".
U jednom dnevnom listu objavljen je članak novinarke pod naslovom ”Zagrebačka tužiteljica dilerskom paru ”isposlovala” kazne ispod minimuma”.
This was a criminal case in which two defendants were indicted for drug dealing.
Radilo se o kaznenom predmetu u kojem je bilo optuženo dvoje okrivljenika, zbog preprodaje opojnih droga.
However, the text of the article was correct and there was no need to deny the statements it contained.
Međutim, tekst samog članak je korektan te nije bilo potrebe za demantiranjem navoda iz članka.
However, the effect of the published title, which was of considerable size, and drew readers' attention immediately with its sensationalistic style and the effect of the later on published correction was of different intensity, so we are of opinion that layout of the articles and titles present a separate problem, even more due to the fact that the editor can argue that he/she is not accountable for the layout of the text and refuse to publish a correction.
Međutim, efekt objavljenog naslova, znatnijeg formata , koji odmah privlači pažnju čitatelja svojim senzacionalizmom i efekt kasnije objavljenog ispravka je različitog intenziteta, tako da smatramo da poseban problem predstavljaju upravo redakcijske opreme tekstova i naslovi., tim više iz razloga što je moguće da urednik navede da nije odgovoran za opremu teksta te odbije objavu ispravka naslova.
TEXT OF THE CORRECTION/DENIAL:
TEKST ISPRAVKA:
- (if necessary)
- ( ukoliko je potrebno)
"Esteemed,
„ Poštovani,
This statement presented in the title is not true.
Navedena tvrdnja, iznesena u naslovu, nije točna.
Namely, the Criminal Act in Article
Naime, Kazneni zakon u čl.
Such a title is evidently guided by sensationalism and not by quality reporting, therefore we ask you to publish a correction according to the Article
Takav naslov očito je usmjeren senzacionalizmu a ne kvaliteti informiranja, pa stoga tražimo da objavite ispravak ,sukladno čl.
The first (I) defendant
I okr.
J.M.: was accused for selling 0.7g of cocaine to the second (II) defendant
J.M: bio je optužen zbog preprodaje 0,7 g kokaina II okr.
I.Š., who bought the drugs for further sale.
I.Š., koja je tu drogu kupila radi daljnje prodaje.
During the main hearing, lead by the fact that the amount of drugs was small, that both defendants confessed the crime, and that the I defendant was a younger adult (an adult between 18-21 years), that the II defendant was never sentenced before, and having in mind that for the mentioned criminal act a very strict minimum sentence of three year imprisonment is proscribed, with an option of court reduction of the sentence by two years, and an option to, following the proposal of the State Attorney, a sentence of one year imprisonment can be set, the prosecutor suggested a one year sentence for both defendants, deeming the penalty to be adequate, considering all circumstances mentioned.
Na glavnoj raspravi, rukovodeći se činjenicom da se radi o maloj količini droge, da su oboje okrivljenika priznali djelo, da je I okr. mlađi punoljetnik , da II okr. nije nikad bila osuđivana, a imajući pritom u vidu da je za navedeno kazneno djelo predviđena vrlo stroga minimalna kazna od tri godine zatvora, uz mogućnost sudskog ublažavanja od minimalno dvije godine, te mogućnost da se na prijedlog državnog odvjetnika izrekne kazna od godinu dana, zastupnica optužbe predložila je izricanje kazne od godinu dana za oboje okrivljenika, smatrajući ttakovu kaznu dostatnom , uzimajući u obzir sve istaknute okolnosti.
Clearly, such a malicious title of the article, in which allegations were made that the prosecutor acted upon bias, was not in place.
Naravno da stoga nije bilo mjesta ovako malicioznom naslovu teksta, u kojem se insinuira pristrano postupanje tužiteljice.
Namely, since this was one of the first cases in which the Prosecutors Office used the legal option to propose a one year imprisonment sentence for the perpetrators of the drug abuse offence, for less severe forms of such crimes, the journalist posed a rhetorical question if such action of the prosecution was a sign of a more lenient sanctioning of drug abuse or was it simply an isolated case.
Naime, kako je to bio jedan od prvih slučajeva u kojima je tužilaštvo iskoristilo zakonsku mogućnost da predloži kaznu zatvora od godine dana za počinitelja kaznenog djela zlouporabe opojnih droga, za lakše oblike takovih kaznenih djela, novinarka je postavila retoričko pitanje da li je takav potez tužiteljstva naznaka ublažavanja sankcioniranja zlouporabe droge ili je tek riječ o izoliranom slučaju.
Then she presents correctly all the circumstances regarding the case and mitigating circumstances applying to both defendants, so the title of the article does not derive from the content, but is in fact in discrepancy and clearly and exclusively directed only toward sensationalism.
Potom korektno ističe sve okolnosti slučaja i olakotne okolnosti na strani oboje okrivljenika, pa naslov teksta uopće ne proizlazi iz sadržaja teksta već je u diskrepanciji i očito usmjeren samo i isključivo na senzacionalizam.
The County State Attorney Office sent a letter to the chief editor of the respective newspaper, in which it was stated that the information in the title is not correct and that the deputy prosecutor did not act unusual or against the law. The letter also contained a thorough presentation of the competences of the State Attorney to propose the length of the sentence and a request for correction was placed.
Županijsko državno odvjetništvo uputilo je dopis glavnom uredniku navedenog lista, u kojem dopisu se navodi da tvrdnja iz naslova nije točna te da u postupanju zamjenice nije bilo nikakvom nezakonitog ili neuobičajenog postupanja i pobliže su objašnjene ovlasti državnog odvjetnika za predlaganje visine kaznene sankcije, te je zatražena je objava ispravka.
in the daily newspaper "Novi list" an article was published, written by Ana Radić Knežević, on September 30 2009 and titled "A prosecutor from Zagreb "arranged" penalties below the minimum to a dealer couple".
u dnevnom listu ”Novi list” dana 30.rujna 2009. objavljen je članak Ane Raić Knežević pod naslovom ”Zagrebačka tužiteljica dilerskom paru ”isposlovala” kazne ispod minimuma”.
The deputy of the County State Attorney in Zagreb, who acted as a prosecutor in this case, did not act unusually or contrary to the law in any way.
U postupanju zamjenice Županijskog državnog odvjetnika u Zagrebu, koja je zastupala optužbu u tom predmetu, nije bilo nikakvog nezakonitog ili neuobičajenog postupanja zastupnice optužbe.
57 paragraph 3 empowers the State Attorney to propose a milder penalty from the one proscribed for certain criminal actions, within the limits of legal sanctioning, when conditions for such a proposal are met.
57 st.3 ovlašćuje državnog odvjetnika da predloži i blažu kaznu od propisane za određeno kazneno djelo, u granicama zakonskog kažnjavanja, kad se ta takav prijedlog steknu uvjeti.
The circumstances which led the prosecutor to propose a penalty below minimum are correctly cited in the text of the article, but the title maliciously insinuates that the actions of the prosecutor were, at least, suspicious.
Okolnosti koje su navele zastupnicu optužbe da predloži kaznu ispod minimuma korektno su citirane u tekstu, no naslov teksta zlonamjerno insinuira da bi postupanje tužiteljice bilo, u najmanju ruku, sumnjivo.
40, 41 and 42 of the Media Act."
40, 41 i 42 Zakona o medijima.”
HATE CRIMES IN 2009
ZLOČINI IZ MRŽNJE 2009.
Article of the Criminal Code
Članak KZ-a
Reported person
Prijavljena osoba
Location of the crime/Police Department
Mjesto počinjenja/ Policijska uprava
State of procedure
Faza postupka
Article
čl.
Zagreb, Zagreb
Zagreb, zagrebačka
paragraph 3.
stavak 3.
of the Criminal Code and Article
KZ i čl.
331, paragraph 1 and Article
331.st.1, i čl.
defendant - a sentence of 8 months in prison and 3 years of supervision was set.
Okrivljena - kazna zatvora u trajanju od 8 mjeseci s rokom provjeravanja 3 godine.
331 and 99 paragraph
331. i 99. st.
1 and paragraph
1. i st.
4 in relation to the Article
4. u vezi čl.
5 unidentified persons
5 NN osoba
Inquiries are in progress.
U tijeku su izvidi.
Identity of the perpetrators has not been determined.
Nije utvrđen identitet počinitelja.
community service), 2nd
Rad za opće dobro), II.
Petar Tomčić
Petar Tomičić
Darijo Božinović and Petar Tomčić - dismissal May 10 2006
Darijo Božinović i Petar Tomičić - odbačaj 10.05.2006. godine
Kristijan Šivak, Krešimir Baturina - dismissal May 10 2006,
Kristijan Šivak, Krešimir Baturina - odbačaj 10.05.2006. godine,
Tomislav Kardum - dismissal May 10 2006
Tomislav Kardum - odbačaj 10.05.2006.
Indictment proposal April 26 2010
Optužni prijedlog 26.04.2010. godine
paragraph
st.
paragraph 2.
stavak 2
to the Municipal Court in Kostajnica, Permanent service in Dvor against the
OS Kostajnica, Stalna služba u Dvoru optužni prijedlog protiv okr.
129, paragraph 2.
129., stavak 2.
of the Criminal Code against Zoran Rogo.
KZ na štetu Zorana Rogo.
Obrovac, Zadarska Police Department
Obrovac, PU zadarska
of the Criminal Code.
Kaznenog zakona.
Criminal charges have been filed by NGOs Iskorak and Kontra regarding this event, within the Municipal State Attorney Office a file was created under the number KM-DO-4642/2009, no State Attorney decision has been made yet.
U odnosu na ovaj događaj je zaprimljena i kaznena prijava podnesena po udrugama Iskorak i Kontra, u ODO je osnovan predmet broj KM-DO-4642/2009 te za sad nije donesena državnoodvjetnička odluka.
1 of the Criminal Code and they were sentenced to one year and six months of prison, for the crime according to Article
1 KZ utvrđena kazna zatvora u trajanju od jedne godine i šest mjeseci, za KD iz čl.
of the Criminal Code they were sentenced to ten months of prison, and finally, based on the Article
KZ kazna zatvora u trajanju od deset mjeseci te im je potom na temelju čl.
Alternative procedure upon criminal charges was implemented in this case, the institute of decision-making based on the principle of purposefulness was used, due to that reason, after the defendant had accepted the criminal responsibility for the crime and fulfilled the ordered obligation to pay a certain amount of money to the Oncology Ward of the Paediatric Clinic, of the Rijeka Clinical Hospital, charges were dismissed on April 23, 2009.
U navedenom predmetu primijenjen je alternativni način postupanja po kaznenoj prijavi, odnosno institut odlučivanja o kaznenom progonu prema načelu svrhovitosti, slijedom čega je, nakon što je osumnjičenik Mirsad Ramić, prihvatio kaznenu odgovornost za učin predmetnog kaznenog djela i ispunio naloženu mu obvezu u vidu uplate novčanog iznosa u korist Odjela onkologije Klinike za dječje bolesti, Kliničkog bolničkog centra Rijeka, donijeto rješenje o odbačaju kaznene prijave dana 23. travnja 2009. godine.
Two files were created under numbers K-DO-8128/2009 and KM-DO-14/2009
Osnovani predmeti pod broje K-DO-8128/2009 i KM-DO-14/2009
The proposal for indictment was submitted against Meho Alagić, Marijan Kulijer and Tomislav Ruklić for committing a crime of violent behaviour according to Article 331, paragraph 1, in relation to Article 89, paragraph 36
Protiv Mehe Alagića, Marijana Kulijera i Tomislava Ruklića podnesen je optužni prijedlog zbog počinjenja kaznenog djela nasilničkog ponašanja iz članka 331. stavka 1. u svezi s člankom 89. stavkom 36.
of the Criminal Code and for the crime of inflicting bodily injury according to Article 98 and in relation to Article 102 of the Criminal Code to Gabrijel Pađan, who is juvenile.
KZ te kaznenog djela tjelesne ozljede iz članka 98. u svezi članka 102 KZ na štetu maloljetnika Gabrijela Pađana.
Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb passed a convicting judgement number Ko-375/2009 on May 7 2009, pursuant to which Meho Alagić and Marijan Kuler for the crime defined by Article
Donesena je osuđujuća presuda Općinskog kaznenog suda u Zagrebu, broj Ko-375/2009 od 7.svibnja 2009. te je Mehi Alagiću i Marijanu Kulijeru za KD iz čl.
60 of the Criminal Code, they were given each a unique sentence of two years in prison, while to Tomislav Ruklić for the crime defined by Article
60 KZ izrečena jedinstvena kazna zatvora u trajanju od po dvije godine, dok je Tomislavu Rukliću za KD iz čl.
1 of the Criminal Code, a sentence was set to ten months of prison and, for the crime according to Article
KZ utvrđena kazna zatvora u trajanju od deset mjeseci i za KD iz čl.
98 of the Criminal Code, a sentence of six months in prison, according to Article
98 KZ kazna zatvora u trajanju od 6 mjeseci te na temelju čl.
60 of the Criminal Code, a unique sentence was set to one year in prison.
60 KZ izrečena jedinstvena kazna zatvora u trajanju od jedne godine.
During the entire criminal procedure, the defendants were in custody.
Tijekom čitavog trajanja kaznenog postupka okrivljenici su se nalazili u pritvoru.
No appeal was filed by the Municipal State Attorney, while the appeals filed by all the three defendants were rejected and the convicting judgement of the first degree court was confirmed.
U odnosu na osuđujuću presudu, općinsko državno odvjetništvo nije podnosilo žalbe, dok su žalbe sve trojice okrivljenika odbijene te je potvrđena prvostupanjska presuda.
A separate procedure was held against Stjepan Kolak due to the fact that he was a juvenile, and a proposal for imposing a correctional measure has been submitted due to committing a crime from Article
Odvojeni postupak vodio se prema maloljetnom Stjepanu Kolaku u odnosu na kojeg je podnesen prijedlog za izricaje odgojne mjere zbog počinjenja KD iz čl.
1 of the Criminal Code after conducting a preparatory procedure during which it has not been proven that the assault made by juvenile
1 KZ i to nakon provedenog pripremnog postupka u kojem nije dokazano da bi napad mal.
Stjepan Kolak was motivated by nationality of Gabrijel Pađan, due to which, during the main hearing, the crime was not qualified as a hate crime according to the Article
Stjepana Kolaka bio motiviran nacionalnom pripadnošću Gabriela Pađana, zbog čega je u fazi glavne rasprave izostala kvalifikacija zločina iz mržnje u smislu čl.
Pursuant to the decision of the Youth Council of the Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb, the following measures were imposed on him: correctional measures of increased care and supervision; the special obligation to accept employment and maintain employed; as well as to avoid the company of Meho Alagić.
Rješenjem Vijeća za mladež Općinskog kaznenog suda u Zagrebu, izrečene su mu odgojne mjere pojačane brige i nadzora i posebnih obveza da prihvati zaposlenje i u njemu ustraje te da se kloni društva Mehe Alagića.
Afterwards, the identity of an additional assaulter was determined, the defendant Radomir Pantić, and a supplement to the criminal charges was submitted for the crime defined by Article
Naknadno je utvrđen identitet još jednog napadača, okrivljenog Radomira Pantića u odnosu na kojeg je podnesena nadopuna kaznene prijave zbog počinjenja KD iz čl.
The judgement was made on August 18 2009
Donesena je presuda od 18. kolovoza 2009.
(Ko-682/2009) by which the defendant was pronounced guilty for both crimes and sentenced to one year and four months in prison, and ten months in prison, and a unique sentence of two years in prison was set and confirmed by the County Court in Zagreb which rejected his appeal.
(Ko-682/2009) kojom je okrivljeni proglašen krivim za oba kaznena djela te su mu utvrđene kazne zatvora u trajanju od jedne godine i četiri mjeseca, odnosno deset mjeseci, te mu je izrečena jedinstvena kazna zatvora u trajanju od dvije godine koja je potvrđena presudom Županijskog suda u Zagrebu, kojom je odbijena njegova žalba.
All four criminally charged for a crime defined by Article
Svi četvero prijavljeni za čl.
1 and in relation to the Article 33
1. u vezi članka 33.
With resepct to the first defendant Alen Baričević and second defendant Petra Mihetec, proposal for indictment was filed for a crime defined by Article
U odnosu na I.okrivljenog Alena Baričevića i II.okrivljene Petre Mihetec podnesen je optužni prijedlog zbog KD iz čl.
1 and in relation to Article
1. u svezi čl.
of the Criminal Code and the Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb (Ko-421/09) passed the following judgement - both defendants were pronounced guilty and the first defendant was sentenced to ten months in prison, but based on Article
KZ te je Općinski kazneni sud u Zagrebu (Ko-421/09) donio presudu - oboje okrivljenika su proglašeni krivima te je I. okrivljeni - kazna zatvora u trajanju od deset mjeseci s time da je na temelju čl.
of the Criminal Code, a probation sentence was proclaimed with duration of 4 years.
KZ-a primjenjena uvjetna osuda s rokom 4 godine.
First juvenile Dino Zajec - corrective measure was set and he was transferred to a Correctional Institution
I. maloljetnikA Dino Zajec - donesena je odgojna mjera upućivanja u Odgojni zavod
The second minor Filip Zubac- correctional measure of special obligation to engage in the work of humanitarian organisations or in works of utility or ecological importance in duration of 120 hours was set, as well as compulsory individual or group youth counselling.
II. maloljetnik Filip Zubac - donesena je odgojna mjera posebne obveze uključivanja u rad humanitarnih organizacija ili u poslove komunalnog ili ekološkog značenja u trajanju od 120 sati te uključivanje u pojedinačni ili skupni rad u savjetovalište za mlade.
Upon the appeal of the minor, the decision of the 1st degree court was cancelled and in a repeated procedure, by to the decision of the Youth Council of the Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb, the first juvenile was declared with a correctional measure pursuant to which he was sent to the Centre for education in a continuous period of three months, increased care and supervision and a special obligation to participate in individual or group youth counselling.
Po žalbi maloljetnika ukinitu je I. stupanjsko rješenje te je u ponovljenom postupku Rješenjem Vijeća za mladež OKS u Zagrebu I. maloljetnom izrečena odgojna mjera upućivanja u Centar za odgoj u neprekinutom trajanju od tri mjeseca, pojačane brige i nadzora i posebne obveze uključivanja u pojedinačni ili skupni rad u savjetovalište za mlade.
The second juvenile was declared with a correctional measure of special obligation to participate in individual or group youth counselling.
II. maloljetnom izrečena je odgojna mjera posebne obveze uključivanja u pojedinačni ili skupni rad u savjetovalište za mlade.
An appeal was filed by the second minor's attorney against this decision.
I protiv tog rješenja podnesena je žalba branitelja II.maloljetnika.
2nd degree judgement has not yet been passed.
Nije još donesena II. stupanjska odluka.
In regard to the juveniles, a proposal for correctional measures was made to the first juvenile (Biljan) - a correctional measure of placement in the Correctional Institution, and to the second minor - a correctional measure of increased care and supervision with compulsory psycho-social treatment in order to eliminate violent behaviour, and placement in the Centre for education for a continuous period of for committing a crime pursuant to the Criminal Code, Article
U odnosu na maloljetnike, stavljen je prijedlog za izricanjem odgojnih mjera i to I.maloljetniku (Biljan) - odgojna mjera upućivanja u Odgojni zavod, a II. maloljetnik - odgojna mjera pojačane brige i nadzora uz posebnu obvezu podvrgavanja psiho-socijalnom tretmanu radi otklanjanja nasilničkog ponašanja i upućivanja u Centar za odgoj na neprekidni boravak u maksimalnom trajanju zbog počinjenja KD iz čl.
After the preparatory procedure, the crimes were not qualified as hate crimes due to lack of evidence.
Nakon provedenog pripremnog postupka izostala je kvalifikacija ovih KD kao KD počinjenih iz mržnje zbog nedostatka dokaza.
With respect to the juveniles, the Council for Youth of the Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb has passed a valid and binding decision by which juveniles were charged with the proposed correctional measures.
U odnosu na maloljetnike Vijeće za mladež OKS u zagrebu donijelo je pravomoćno Rješenje kojim je maloljetnicima izrečena predložena odgojna mjera.
Based on the investigation activities, a decision of the County Court in Zagreb was passed to dismiss criminal charges against Damir Štampar.
Damiru Štamparu, na temelju provedenih istražnih radnji, doneseno je Rješenje Županijskog suda u Zagrebu o odbačaju kaznene prijave.
juvenile
mlt.
Regarding the juvenile
U odnosu na mlt.
Marko Biljan, preparatory procedure was cancelled by the decision of the Judge for Youth of the Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb due to lack of purpose (because against the same juvenile, a correctional measure of placement in a Correctional institute was already being executed).
Marka Biljana obustavljen je pripremni postupka Rješenjem suca za mladež OKS u Zagrebu zbog nesvrhovitosti (jer se prema istom mlt. se već provodila odgojna mjera upućivanja u odgojni zavod).
Damir Štampar - a decision was passed to dismiss criminal charges due to lack of reasonable doubt that he had committed the crimes mentioned.
Damir Štampar - donijeto je Rješenje o odbačaju kaznene prijave zbog nepostojanja osnovane sumnje da je počinio navedena kaznena djela.
Non-binding convicting judgement
Nepravomoćna osuđujuća presuda.
Dismissal, February 11 2010
Odbačaj 11.02.2010.
Criminal charges were submitted for the crime defined by Article
Podnesena je kaznena prijava zbog KD iz čl.
263 in relation to Article
263. u vezi čl.
Given their status of young adults (Adrian Lobotar, Pavao Halaman, Ivan Manaj), a decision was passed to dismiss criminal charges due to lack of reasonable doubt that they have committed the crime mentioned.
S obzirom na mlađe punoljetnike (Adrian Lobotar, Pavao Halaman, Ivan Manaj) donijeto je Rješenje o odbačaju kaznene prijave zbog nepostojanja osnovane sumnje da su počinili navedeno kazneno djelo.
With respect to the minor Vito Trinajstić, for the same reasons a decision was passed not to initiate the criminal procedure.
Prema maloljetnom Viti Trinajstiću, iz istih razloga donijeto je Rješenje o nepokretanju kaznenog postupka.
Indictment proposal dated August 28 2009, 1st degree judgement:
Optužni prijedlog 28.08.2009. godine, I. stupanjska presuda:
(& months of prison, replaced by
(& mjeseci zatvora, zamj.
degree judgement awaiting enforceability
Stupanjsak presuda čeka pravomoćnost