natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Also it is evident from the transcript of the testimony that the witness continued with his regular activities already on the 5th of August.
Također je iz transkripta svjedočenja vidljivo kako je svjedok već 5. kolovoza nastavio s redovitim aktivnostima.
In fact, when asked by Mr.
Naime, na upit g.
Du Toit to explain his statement in the previous report he stated as follows:
Du Toit-a, da pojasni navod iz ranijeg izvješća:
In Article 1234 it is stated that " Serbs were forced to leave Krajina during the Operation Storm".
U članku 1234. navodi se kako su „Srbi bili prisiljeni napustiti Krajinu tijekom operacije Oluja“.
They attempt to establish the coercion in President Tuđman's words "Serbs must disappear".
Prisila se pokušava utemeljiti u riječima predsjednika Tuđmana kako „Srbi moraju nestati“.
However, several convoys of civilians left the area of so called
Međutim, nekoliko konvoja civila napustilo je područje tzv.
RSK /Republic of Serbian Krajina/ even before the Operation Storm.
RSK i prije početka „Oluje“.
The Serbian leadership in so called
Time je vodstvo Srba u tzv.
RSK thereby showed that the loss of power in the occupied areas must be followed by the exodus of the civilians.
RSK pokazalo da gubitak vlasti na okupiranim područjima mora biti praćen i odlaskom civila.
We find confirmation of this in testimonies of several witnesses, for example witness Mira Grubor stated (transcript, p.
Potvrdu nalazimo i u svjedočenjima nekoliko svjedoka, primjerice svjedokinja Mira Grubor izjavila je (transkript, str.
1388) that she had sent her five years old daughter to Serbia 6 days before the beginning of the MPO Storm and after the fall of Bosansko Grahovo.
1388) kao je 6 dana prije početka VRA Oluje i nakon pada Bosanskog Grahova petogodišnju kćer poslala u Srbiju.
In several places it is stated that Serbs were victims when the civilians were pulled out of the convoys (Article
Na nekoliko se mjesta navode i podaci o tomu kako su Srbi bili žrtve i tijekom izvlačenja civila u kolonama (čl.
For example in Article
Primjerice u čl.
1233 it is stated that one of the extraction routes for Serbs was direction Topusko-Glina-Petrinja-Sisak and then along the highway via Lipovac towards Serbia.
1233. navode se kako je jedan od smjerova izvlačenja Srba bio i pravac Topusko-Glina-Petrinja-Sisak i autocestom preko Lipovca za Srbiju.
The Serbian counter-claim does not contain the fact that the mentioned exodus of Serbs was the result of the decision of the leadership of local Serbs and the agreement between the two sides reached after the surrender of the of military forces of so called
U srbijanskoj protutužbi ne navode se činjenice kako je navedeni izlazak Srba bio posljedica odluke vodstva lokalnih Srba i dogovora dviju strana nakon predaje vojnih snaga tzv.
RSK to Croatian Army in Banovina area.
RSK Hrvatskoj vojsci na području Banovine.
Further on, Croatia provided the exit route and provisions at several rest posts.
Nadalje, Hrvatska je osigurala prometnicu za izlazak, pomoć u namirnicama na nekoliko odmorišta.
The mentioned convoy was escorted by several representatives if various bodies (UN, EU and other), that certainly would not be there if this was the case of ethnic cleansing.
Navedeni je konvoj pratilo i više predstavnika različitih tijela (UN, EU i sl.), koji zasigurno tamo ne bi bili ukoliko je bila riječ o etničkom čišćenju.
Also, there was a possibility to leave the convoy and return home, something only a few families did.
Također je postojalo i mogućnost napuštanja konvoja i povratka kući, što je iskoristilo svega nekoliko obitelji.
The first section of the mentioned convoy consisted mostly of private vehicles with members of the military and the police of so called
Prvi dio navedenog konvoja činila su osobna vozila ponajviše s predstavnicima vojske i milicije tzv.
1234 it is stated that between 180000 and 220000 was forced to leave Krajina.
1234. navodi se kako je između 180.000 i 220.000 bilo prisiljeno napustiti Krajinu.
However, the real problem arises when attempting to determine the precise information on the number of Serb refugees from Croatia (in Serbia).
Međutim, pravi problem nastaje kada se pokušaju utvrditi precizni podaci o broju izbjeglih Srba iz Hrvatske (u Srbiji).
However, several months after the Operation Storm, UNHCR numbers show 330000 of displaced persons and refugees in Serbia and Montenegro.
Međutim, nekoliko mjeseci nakon Oluje, UNHCR u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori bilježi 330.000 prognanika i izbjeglica.
The significantly smaller number of refugees in Serbia, after the Operation Storm, indicates a lack of updating of the records as well as manipulation with the refugee issue by the Serbian government.
Značajno smanjivanje broj izbjeglica u Srbiji, nakon proteka oluje, govori samo o neažurnom vođenju evidencije ali i o manipulaciji srbijanskih vlasti s izbjegličkom problematikom.
1237 the defendant stated that so far there is no precise number of persons killed during the MPO Storm because Croatian bodies „subsequently limited the movement of everyone, including the representatives of the international community in order to cover up the crimes“.
1237. tuženik navodi do sada nije utvrđen precizan broj ubijenih osoba tijekom VRA Oluja budući da su hrvatska tijela „svima, uključujući predstavnike međunarodne zajednice, naknadno ograničila kretanjem područjem kako bi prikrile zločine“.
Referring to the testimony of the UN military observer Tor Munkelien (sometime his name is written as - Ton, last name- Minkuielien) dated 15.04.2008.
Pri tomu se tuženik poziva na svjedočenje vojnog promatrača UN-a Tora Munkelien (ime se ponegdje navodi - Ton, prezime - Minkuielien) od 15.04.2008.
However, the transcript contains the following wording by Edward Russo for the Office of the Prosecutor :„During some of these patrols, Mr.
Međutim u transkriptu se nalazi slijedeća formulacija koju je izrekao Edward Russo for the Office of the Prosecutor :„During some of these patrols, Mr.
Munkelien and his fellow UNMOs were restricted in their movements by HV soldiers or civilian police who had set up checkpoints on the main roads leading into Knin.“ However, during the testimony the witness also stated the following „We put it into the sitrep and I think we covered most of the areas.
Munkelien and his fellow UNMOs were restricted in their movements by HV soldiers or civilian police who had set up checkpoints on the main roads leading into Knin.“ Međutim svjedok je tijekom izlaganja rekao i slijedeće „We put it into the sitrep and I think we covered most of the areas.
We were all over the area during the period that I was there.“ (transcript, p.
We were all over the area during the period that I was there.“ (transkript, str.
Also, later in the text the witness responds to a following conclusion made by Attorney Cayley:
Također, kasnije u tekstu svjedok je na konstataciju odvjetnika Cayleya:
„So it would be fair to say that you had freedom of movement subject to the security considerations that were agreed between the UNCRO military commander in Sector South and the Croatian authorities; yes?“ and the witness responds as follows:
„So it would be fair to say that you had freedom of movement subject to the security considerations that were agreed between the UNCRO military commander in Sector South and the Croatian authorities; yes?“ rekao slijedeće:
„Yes, we had the freedom of movement“ (transcript, p.
„Yes, we had the freedom of movement“ (transkript, str.
The witness also stated the following:
Svjedok je također rekao i slijedeće:
"But even when it was restricted, we managed to find other roads and to reach the areas he we wished to visit“ (transcript, p.
"But even when it was restricted, we managed to find other roads and to reach the areas he we wished to visit“ (transkript, str.
In line with the stated views of the witness, the initial position of the defendant, according to which the restriction of movement made it impossible to determine the precise number of victims after the MPO Storm, cannot be corroborated.
Sukladno navedenim stajalištima svjedoka nije moguće potkrijepiti početni stav tuženika prema kojemu je ograničavanje kretanja onemogućilo utvrđivanje preciznog broja žrtava nakon VRA Oluja.
In Article 1273 the defendant states that 13 Serbs were killed in the village of Plavno.
U članku 1273. tuženik navodi kako je 13 Srba ubijeno u mjestu Plavno.
Testimony of Aleksandar Tchernetsky is mentioned as one of the sources of information (transcript, p.
Kao jedna od izvora informacije navodi se i svjedočenje Aleksandra Tchernetskyja (transkript, str.
3209) regarding the finding of a body of a man who was killed together with several sheep and a dog during the sweeping operation in the village of Plavno.
3209.) o pronalasku tijela muškarca ubijenog zajedno s nekoliko ovaca i psom tijekom akcije čišćenja u mjestu Plavno.
However, during the testimony and cross examination by Defence Counsel Kuzmanović it was determined that the witness had not seen the body of the man, not did he have any information on the perpetrator of the nurser, as the witness himself stated:
Međutim, tijekom svjedočenja i ispitivanja odvjetnika Kuzmanovića utvrđeno je kako svjedok nije vidio tijelo muškarca, niti raspolaže podatke o počinitelju ubojstva, budući da je sam svjedok rekao:
I didn't see the man“ (transcript, p.
I didn't see the man“ (transkript, str.
3212) and that it was a member of his patrol that actually saw the body.
3212) te da je tijelo muškarca vidio član njegove patrole.
Also, the witness was unable to confirm the existence of a written report on the mentioned finding of the body.
Također, svjedok nije mogao potvrditi da je uopće postojalo pisano izvješće o navedenom pronalasku tijela muškarca.
Further on, in Article
Nadalje, u čl.
1355 it is stated that the Croatian authorities settled Croats into Serbian houses.
1355 navodi se kao su hrvatske vlasti naselile srpske kuće Hrvatima.
At the same time forgetting the fact that after the Operation Storm the exodus of the non-Serbian population from BiH continued.
Pri tomu se zaboravlja kako je nakon Oluje nastavljen progon nesrpskog stanovništva iz BiH.
According to UNHCR data (Information Notes on former Yugoslavia, UNHCR, 10/95, October 1995.) between 14th of August and 21st of September 1995 22077 persons, mostly Croats and Bosniaks, were forced to leave north-east Bosnia and fled to Croatia (crossing Sava River and the village of Davor), and that many Croats and Bosniaks were forced to leave as they were forcefully removed from their homes.
Prema podacima UNHCR-a (Information Notes on former Yugoslavia, UNHCR, 10/95, October 1995.) navodi se kako je između 14. kolovoza i 21. rujna 1995. iz sjeveroistočne Bosne u Hrvatsku (preko Save i mjesta Davor) protjerano 22.077 osoba, uglavnom Hrvata i Bošnjaka, te kako su mnogi Hrvati i Bošnjaci prisiljeni otići zbog protjerivanja iz njihovih kuća.
And they had to be housed as soon as possible.
A njih je u kratkom roku negdje trebalo ipak smjestiti.
During that period, according to the same source, there was 463000 displaced persons and refugees (from BiH) in Croatia.
U tom razdoblju, prema istom izvoru, u Hrvatskoj je bilo smješteno 463.000 prognanika i izbjeglica (iz BiH).
Several times Krajina is referred to as a separate entity, and in Article
U nekoliko je navrata pisano kao o Krajini kao zasebnom entitetu, te u čl.
1390 it is concluded that so called
1390. zaključeno kako je tzv.
RSK is „a specific geographic area in Croatia with primarily Serbian population, for whom this area represents a historical, religious and cultural seat“.
RSK „specifično zemljopisno područje u Hrvatskoj pretežito naseljeno Srbima, kojima je to područje bilo povijesno, vjersko i kulturno središte“.
Further on , it is stated that "Krajina as such received a status of an UN protected zone."
Dalje se kaže kako je „Krajina kao takva dobila status zone pod zaštitom UN-a.“
However, there is nothing that would suggest the existence of a separate entity, except for a rebel military force, that would provide to what is in an essence a historical category, (Venetian and Austrian military border intended for a creation of a protection zone with regard tot he rest of the empire and to prevent attacks from the Ottoman Empire) , meaning that it never objectively had.
Međutim, ne postoji ništa što bi sugeriralo postojanje zasebnog entiteta, osim pobunjeničke vojne sile, koji jednoj povijesnoj kategoriji (mletačkoj i austrijskoj vojnoj krajini namijenjenoj stvaranju zaštitne zone prema ostatku carstva i prevenciji napada iz Otomanskog carstva) daje tumačenje koje ono objektivno nije imalo.
(2) For the participant in in-service training the Judicial Academy shall cover the cost of the premises as well as the cost of development and production of educational materials, and the judicial body referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall cover the travelling and accommodation expenses as well as the daily allowance.
(2) Za polaznike stručnog usavršavanja Pravosudna akademija snosi troškove osiguranja prostora te troškove razvoja i izrade obrazovnih materijala, a pravosudno tijelo iz stavka 1. ovog članka putne troškove, troškove smještaja te troškove dnevnica.
(3) For the managers of the in-service training the Judicial Academy shall cover the cost of the reward for the preparation and conducting of the educational activity, as well as travelling and accommodation expenses.
(3) Za voditelje stručnog usavršavanja Pravosudna akademija snosi troškove nagrade za pripremu i vođenje obrazovne aktivnosti, putne troškove i troškove smještaja.
of the Courts Act (Official Gazette, no.
Zakona o sudovima (»Narodne novine« br.
150/05, 16/07, 113/08, 153/09) i and Article 122
150/05, 16/07, 113/08, 153/09) i članka 122.
of the Act on the State Attorney's Office(Official Gazette, no.
Zakona o državnom odvjetništvu (»Narodne novine« br.
76/09, 153/09), the Minister of Justice adopts the
76/09, 153/09), ministar pravosuđa donosi
REGULATIONS
PRAVILNIK
ON ADMISSION TO IN-SERVICE TRAINING
O PRISTUPU STRUČNOM USAVRŠAVANJU
(1) Provisions of this Regulations shall determine the competent authority, type, modality, duration and evaluation of the continuous in-service training of judicial officials.
(1) Odredbama ovog Pravilnika utvrđuju se nositelj, vrsta, način, trajanje i vrednovanje stalnog stručnog usavršavanja pravosudnih dužnosnika.
(2) Provisions of this Regulations shall apply, in an appropriate manner, to court and state attorney advisors.
(2) Odredbe ovog Pravilnika na odgovarajući način se primjenjuju i na sudske i državnoodvjetničke savjetnike.
(1) Continuous in-service training of judicial officials represents a permanent completion and improving of knowledge and skills necessary in order to conduct duties of a judge or a state attorney.
(1) Stalno stručno usavršavanje pravosudnih dužnosnika predstavlja trajno upotpunjavanje i unapređivanje znanja i vještina za obnašanje sudačke i državnoodvjetničke dužnosti.
(2) Judges, state attorneys and deputy state attorneys are the judicial officials.
(2) Pravosudni dužnosnici su suci i državni odvjetnici te zamjenici državnih odvjetnika.
(1) A judicial official has a right and an obligation to participate in in-service training and in training programs of the Judicial Academy , and he/ she can also participate in other forms of education and in-service training.
(1) Pravosudni dužnosnik ima pravo i obvezu stručno se usavršavati i sudjelovati u programima obrazovanja i usavršavanja Pravosudne akademije, a može sudjelovati i u drugim oblicima obrazovanja i stručnog usavršavanja.
(2) A judicial official has an obligation to respond when asked by the Judicial Academy to participate in the in-service training programs either as a lecturer - team leader or an attendant.
(2) Pravosudni dužnosnik je dužan odazvati se na poziv Pravosudne akademije da sudjeluje kao predavač - voditelj ili polaznik u programima stručnog usavršavanja.
IN-SERVICE TRAINING COMPETENT AUTHORITY
NOSITELJ STRUČNOG USAVRŠAVANJA
(1) The Judicial Academy is the competent authority for the in-service training.
(1) Nositelj stručnog usavršavanja pravosudnih dužnosnika je Pravosudna akademija.
(2) The in-service training of the judicial officials shall also be conducted at the subsidiaries- Regional centres in Zagreb, Split, Rijeka, Osijek and Varaždin.
(2) Stručno usavršavanje pravosudnih dužnosnika obavlja se i u podružnicama - Regionalnim centrima u Zagrebu, Splitu, Rijeci, Osijeku i Varaždinu.
TYPES AND DURATION OF THE IN-SERVICE TRAINING
VRSTE I TRAJANJE STRUČNOG USAVRŠAVANJA
(1) The in-service training of judicial officials is achieved through various educational activities.
(1) Stručno usavršavanje pravosudnih dužnosnika ostvaruje se kroz različite vrste obrazovnih aktivnosti.
(2) Types of in-service training of the Judicial Academy, that is, types of educational activities are:
(2) Vrste stručnog usavršavanja odnosno obrazovnih aktivnosti Pravosudne akademije su:
- workshops
- radionice
- seminars
- seminari
- round tables
- okrugli stolovi
- conferences and
- konferencije te
- study visits and exchange.
- studijske posjete i razmjene.
(3) Regarding the duration, particular educational activities in paragraph 2 of this Article can last for:
(3) S obzirom na vrijeme trajanja, pojedine obrazovne aktivnosti iz stavka 2. ovog članka mogu biti:
- half a day
- poludnevne
- one day
- jednodnevne
- two days or
- dvodnevne ili
- several days.
- višednevne.
APPLYING FOR PARTICIPATION IN PARTICULAR TYPES OF IN-SERVICE TRAINING
NAČIN PRIJAVLJIVANJA ZA SUDJELOVANJE U POJEDINIM VRSTAMA STRUČNOG USAVRŠAVANJA
(1) The Judicial Academy shall send the invitation to participate in a particular type of in-service training to a Court President or to a Chief State Attorney of the Republic of Croatia as soon as possible, and at the latest, 20 days before the start of the educational activity.
(1) Pravosudna akademija dostavlja poziv za sudjelovanje u pojedinoj vrsti stručnog usavršavanja predsjedniku suda odnosno Glavnom državnom odvjetniku RH, što je moguće ranije, a najkasnije 20 dana prije održavanja obrazovne aktivnosti.
The invitation states the number of judges or state attorneys that can participate in a specific educational activity.
U pozivu je određen broj sudaca odnosno državnih odvjetnika koji mogu sudjelovati u konkretnoj obrazovnoj aktivnosti.
(2) President of the Court or the Chief State Attorney of the Republic of Croatia, after receiving the invitation of the Judicial Academy, shall select the judges or state attorneys respectively, that have shown interest to participate in a particular educational activity and they shall inform the Judicial Academy of their selection.
(2) Predsjednik suda odnosno Glavni državni odvjetnik RH, na poziv Pravosudne akademije, odabire one suce odnosno državne odvjetnike koji su pokazali interes za sudjelovanje u pojedinoj obrazovnoj aktivnosti te o istima izvještava Pravosudnu akademiju.
(3) When selecting the judges or the state attorneys for participation in a particular educational activity of the Judicial Academy, the President of the Court or the Chief State Attorney of the Republic of Croatia shall make sure of an even participation of judges or state attorneys from their court or state attorney's office, of the scope of work of a judge or a state attorney, as well as of target group for which the educational activity was intended.
(3) Pri odabiru sudaca odnosno državnih odvjetnika koji će prisustvovati pojedinoj obrazovnoj aktivnosti Pravosudne akademije, predsjednik suda odnosno Glavni državni odvjetnik RH vodi računa o ravnomjernom prisustvovanju sudaca odnosno državnih odvjetnika sa svojega suda odnosno državnog odvjetništva, o području kojim se sudac odnosno državni odvjetnik bavi, kao i o ciljnoj skupini kojoj je pojedina obrazovna aktivnost namijenjena.
(4) Subsequent applications, in terms of a provision in paragraph 3 of this Article, shall be taken in consideration only if there are vacancies.
(4) Naknadne prijave, u smislu odredbe stavka 3. ovoga članka, uzimaju se u obzir samo ako ima slobodnih mjesta.
Judicial officials need to plan in advance the participation in in-service training programs of the Judicial Academy and to timely inform the head of the judicial body of their employment of their intention to participate in the in-service training.
Sudjelovanje u programima stručnog usavršavanja Pravosudne akademije pravosudni dužnosnik treba pravodobno planirati te o namjeri istoga pravodobno obavijestiti čelnika pravosudnog tijela u kojem je zaposlen.
(1) The Judicial Academy shall keep an appropriate records on the in-service training of judicial officials pursuant to the provisions of this Regulations.
(1) O stručnom usavršavanju pravosudnih dužnosnika Pravosudna akademija vodi odgovarajuću evidenciju u skladu s odredbama ovog Pravilnika.
(2) Information on in-service training at the Judicial Academy and other forms of in-service training of the judicial officials shall be contained in an appropriate records of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Croatia, and they shall be taken into consideration when determining if a judicial official is fulfilling his/hers duties and also for the evaluation of judicial officials.
(2) Podaci o stručnom usavršavanju u Pravosudnoj akademiji i drugim oblicima stručnog usavršavanja pravosudnih dužnosnika sadržani su i u odgovarajućoj evidenciji Ministarstva pravosuđa Republike Hrvatske, a uzimaju se u obzir prilikom utvrđivanja ispunjava li pravosudni dužnosnik svoje dužnosti, kao i prilikom ocjenjivanja pravosudnog dužnosnika.
(1) A judicial official is obligated to participate in at least two of the Judicial Academy educational activities a year.
(1) Pravosudni dužnosnik je dužan sudjelovati u najmanje dvije obrazovne aktivnosti Pravosudne akademije godišnje.
(2) Information on the participation of the judicial officials in the educational activities, the Judicial Academy shall submit to the courts or state attorney offices on a regular basis, once a year or once every six months.
(2) Podatke o sudjelovanju pravosudnih dužnosnika u obrazovnim aktivnostima Pravosudna akademija redovito, godišnje ili polugodišnje, dostavlja sudovima odnosno državnim odvjetništvima.
RECORDS ON THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE IN-SERVICE TRAINING AT THE JUDICIAL ACADEMY
EVIDENCIJA O SUDIONICIMA STRUČNOG USAVRŠAVANJA U PRAVOSUDNOJ AKADEMIJI
(1) The Judicial Academy shall regularly keep and improve the appropriate records - data base on participants for all forms of in-service training at the Judicial Academy.
(1) Pravosudna akademija redovito vodi i unapređuje odgovarajuću evidenciju - bazu podataka o sudionicima u svim vrstama stručnog usavršavanja u Pravosudnoj akademiji.
(2) Records referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall contain the following:
(2) Evidencija iz stavka 1. ovoga članka sadrži:
- first and last name of a participant
- ime i prezime sudionika
- name of the institution in which the participant is employed and the participant's function at the said institution
- naziv institucije u kojoj je polaznik zaposlen i njegovu funkciju
- contact details
- kontakt-podatke
- topic and form of in-service training
- temu i oblik stručnog usavršavanja
- time and place where the in-service training is held and
- vrijeme i mjesto održavanja obrazovne aktivnosti te
- information whether the participant was the lecturer, attendant or developer of working materials for a particular activity of the in-service training.
- podatak je li sudionik bio predavač, polaznik ili je izrađivao radne materijale za pojedinu aktivnost stručnog usavršavanja.
(3) Information on the participation of judicial officials in particular forms if in-service training of the Judicial Academy shall be delivered either on the personal request of the participant and/or at the request of a court chamber.
(3) Podaci o sudjelovanju pravosudnih dužnosnika u pojedinim vrstama stručnog usavršavanja Pravosudne akademije dostavljaju se na njihov osobni zahtjev i/ili na zahtjev sudačkih vijeća.
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION IN FORMS OF IN-SERVICE TRAINING
POTVRDE (CERTIFIKATI) O SUDJELOVANJU U VRSTAMA STRUČNOG USAVRŠAVANJA