natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(beginning at 13,40) the plaintiff Bosiljka Kolarov gave an additional probatory statement indicating that the correct name of her aunt was "Ljeposava", the attorney of the plaintiff Bogdan Vidaković stated that his client was not able to testify due to ill-health and the attorney of the defendant requested a shorter deadline for the response by testimony in loco due to the old age of the defendant preventing her to attend another hearing; the court gave the defendant 8 days to respond and to pay the required advance fee, and it decided that the originals of the signed applications for the issue of the passport and the identity card for Ljeposlava Milaković, born on 29th March 1920, are to be re-requested,
( započeto u 13,40 sati ) izveden dokaz dodatnim saslušanjem tuziteljice Bosiljke Kolarov, na kojem je ročištu išla izjavila da je točno ime njezine tete glasilo "Ljeposava", punomocnik tuzitelja Bogdana Vidakovica je izjavio da isti nije u mogućnosti iskazivati jer je bolestan, a punomoćnik tuženice je zatražio kraći rok radi očitovanja po pilanju izvođenja dokaza njezinim saslušanjem na licu mjesta, obzirom na nemogućnost pristupa suda zbog visoke životne dobi, pa je sud odredio tuženici rok od 8 dana radi očitovanja i uplate odgovarajućeg predujma te odredio da se ponovno ima zatraziti izvornik kartona za izdavanje putne isprave i osobne iskaznice za osobu imena Ljeposlava Milakovic, rodena29. ožujka 1920.g,,
- on 2nd March 2009 the defendant paid the required advance fee for the expert analysis,
-da je tuženica 2. ožujka 2009.g. uplatila potreban predujam za vještačenje,
- by means of the decision of 17th September 2009 the court invited the defendant to state whether she would prefer to give her testimony in loco and if so, to pay the required advance fee,
-da je sud rješenjem od 17. rujna 2009.g. pozvao tuženicu da se očituje predlaže li izvođenje dokaza njezinim saslušanjem na licu mjesta te u tom slučaju uplati potreban predujam,
- by means of the decision of 28th October 2009 it was laid down that the defendant would give her testimony in her apartment on 15th January 2010,
-da je rješenjem od 28. listopada 2009.g. određeno izvođenje dokaza saslušanjem tuženice u njezinom slanu za dan 15. siječanj 2010.g ,
- on 15th January 2010 the defendant deposited her testimony,
-daje 15. siječnja 2010.g. izveden dokaz saslušanjem tuženice,
- on 5th February 2010 a hearing was fixed for 17th March 2010,
~da je 5. veljače 2010.g. zakazano ročište za dan 17. ožujka 2010.g.,
- by means of the letter of 8th February 2010 the plaintiffs' attorney renounced the power of attorney granted by the plaintiffs,
-da je punomoćnik tužitelja podneskom od 8. veljače 2010.g. otkazao punomoć tužiteljima,
- by means of the decision of 11th February 2010 it was established that the attorney Ibrica Zulfirkarpašić renounced the power of attorney granted by the plaintiffs, with the obligation to continue to take actions on their behalf, if necessary, in order to prevent any damage that might have occurred in that period, whilst the plaintiffs were invited at the same time to nominate a new attorney for the reception of documents in the Republic of Croatia within 15 days by means of a decision which was sent to them via diplomatic channels,
-da je rješenjem od 11. veljače 2010.g. utvrđeno da je odvjetnik lbrica Zulfikarpasic otkazao punomoć za zastupanje tužitelja, uz njegovu obvezu da za iste još mjesec dana obavlja radnje ukoliko je potrebno da od njih otkloni kakvu štetu koja bi u to vrijeme mogla nastati, time da su tužitelji istovremeno pozvani u roku od 15 dana postaviti punomoćnika za primanje pismena u Republici Hrvatskoj, koje rješenje je tužiteljima otpremljeno diplomatskim putem,
- the hearing fixed for 17th March 2010 was conducted in the absence of the plaintiffs, who were duly summoned thereto; the defendant proposed the collection of the testimony of the witness Ana Schmidt as regards the circumstances the defendant herself had stated, which proposal was accepted and it was decided that the plaintiffs would be treated in accordance with Art. 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that the next hearing would be fixed in writing,
-da je ročište zakazano za dan 17. ožujak 2010.g. provedeno u odsutnosti uredno pozvanih tužitelja, pa kako je sluzenica predložila da se izvede dokaz saslušanjem svjedoka (Ana Schmidt) na okolnosti o kojima je i ona sama iskazivala, to je isti prijedlog prihvaćen te određeno da se u odnosu na tužitelje ima postupiti prema cl.
- by means of the decision of 17th March 2010 the plaintiffs were invited to nominate an attorney for the reception of documents in the Republic of Croatia; otherwise, the court would appoint as temporary attorney Tamara Abel, attorney in Zagreb, to receive documents at plaintiffs' own expense,
-da su tužitelji rješenjem od 17. ožujka 2010.g. pozvani postaviti punomoćnika za primanje pismena u RII, jer da ce sud u suprotnom istima, a na njihov trošak, postaviti privremenog zastupnika ovlaštenog za primanje pismena u osobi Tamare Abel, odvjetnice u Zagrebu,
- the delivery note for the above documents for plaintiffs was not returned,
-da dostava za tužitelje za gore navedeno rješenje nije vraćena,
- the plaintiff Bosiljka Kolarov informed the court by means of the letter of 25th May 2010 that she had received the decision of 11th February 2010 and stated that the most practical solution would be that she came to the court without her attorney, that she and her brother were British citizens and that her brother intended to move to Zagreb, wherefore she asked to be informed on the possibility to receive state legal assistance in relation to the concerned proceedings,
-da je tužiteljica Bosiljka Kolarov u podnesku od 25. svibnja 2010.g. obavijestila sud o primitku rješenja od 11. veljače 2010.g. te izjavila da bi najpraktičnije bilo da osobno dolazi pred sud bez odvjetnika, da su ona i brat britanski državljani te da se njezin brat planira preseliti u Zagreb, time da traži da se nju obavijesti o tome postoji Si mogućnost državne legalne pomoći vezano za njihov spor,
- on 28th May 2009 and 24th August 2010 the court requested from the Ministry of justice - Directorate for the European Union and international cooperation the notification of the delivery or the delivery note for the decision of 17th March 2010.
-da je sud 28. svibnja 2009.g. i 24. kolovoza 2010.g. od Ministarstva pravosuđa, Uprave za europsku uniju i međunarodnu suradnju zatražio obavijest o dostavi odnosno dostavnici za rješenje od 17. ožujka 2010.g..
is due in the first place to the inefficient delivery of documents to plaintiffs (since the plaintiffs did not have an attorney to represent them and to receive court documents and notifications during a certain period and live abroad, and it is general knowledge that the delivery of documents via diplomatic channels requires time) and the complexity of the case (need to collect testimonies from the witnesses and parties and to carry out the handwriting analysis).
prvenstveno doprinijela neučinkovita dostava pismena tužiteljima (budući da isti kroz određeno vrijeme nisu imali punomoćnika odnosno punomoćnika za primanje pismena, a nalaze se u inozemstvu i opće je poznato da diplomatska dostava iziskuje dulje vrijeme) kao i složenost postupka (potreba za izvođenjem dokaza saslušanjem svjedoka i stranaka odnosno grafoioskog vjestačenja).
From the above it is clear that the lengthiness of this proceedings
Iz svega prethodno navedenog proizlazi da je dugotrajnosti vođenja ove parnice
Sincerely yours,
S poštovanjem,
With reference to the note on the query addressed to the member of the European Parliament, Mr. Charles Tannock, concerning the objections to the work of the Croatian judicial system, in which note the above mentioned member of the Parliament expressed his "concern due to the possibility that (in this case) the nationality of parties involved influences the lengthiness of the process", we highlight that the nationality of parties involved in this process is in no relation whatsoever with the lengthiness thereof.
U odnosu na istaknutu bilješku o upitu upućenom zastupniku u Europskom parlamentu dr Charlesu Tannocku, vezano uz primjedbe na rad hrvatskog pravosuđa, u kojoj bilješci isti izražava "zabrinutost zbog mogućnosti da (u ovom slučaju) "nacionalna pripadnost utječe na duzinu trajanja procesa" ističemo da nacionalnost bilo koje od stranaka u ovom postupku nije ni u kakvoj vezi sa duljinom trajanja parnice.
By authorisation of the president of the court, President of the Civil Proceedings Department Judge Ana Gradišek
Po ovlaštenju predsjednice suda, Predsjednica parničnog odjela Sutkinja/Ana^Sradisek
- on 22nd September 2006 the notification was received that the delivery of the above document to the plaintiffs was not executed due to the fact that they were located in London, wherefore on 27th September 2006 the copy of the above report was sent via diplomatic channels to the plaintiffs to the address: London W 392 Q 24 BUKXTON GARDENS, ENGLAND,
-da je 22. rujna 2006.g. primljena obavijest da se dostava za tužitelje nije mogla izvrsiti, jer da se isti nalaze u Londonu, slijedom čega je 27. rujna 2006.g. preslika spomenutog zapisnika otpremljena tužiteljima diplomatskim putem na adresu London W 392 Q 24 BUKXTON GARDENS, ENGLESKA,
The interview was conducted from 10,20 to 11,40 AM on the premises of the War Crimes Section.
Razgovor je obavljen u vremenu od 10,20 do 11,40 sati u prostorijama Odsjeka ratnih zločina.
On 31 October 2007 a interview was conducted with DRAGUTIN PAVOŠEVIĆ, son of Stjepan, born on 1 January 1950 in Dalj, with the address Matije Gupca 14A, Dalj, Municipality of Erdut, married to Marija (maiden surname Pilić), with whom he has a son, Mario (1973), and a daughter, Snježana Kadić (1981) (lives in Pula), with completed secondary education, working as baker; for further requirements may be contacted at the phone number 590 878.
Dana 31. listopada 2007. g. obavljen je obavijesni razgovor sa DRAGUTINOM PAVOŠEVIĆ rođen 01.
On 1 August 1991
Dana 01. kolovoza 1991. g.
immediately before the attacks on Dalj he was in his house.
uoči početka napada na mjesto Dalj nalazio se u obiteljskoj kući.
In the evening he headed towards Osijek with his family.
U večernjim satima zajedno sa obitelji krenuo je prema Osijeku.
They were held up near the train station by the members of the Yugoslav National Army (JNA).
Mještani su zaustavljeni u razini sa željezničkom stanicom gdje su ih zadržali pripadnici JNA.
They were withheld until morning hours of 2 August 1991, when they proceeded by bus to the village Bijelo Brdo, where the bus was stopped in the centre.
Zadržani sve do jutarnjih sati 02. kolovoza 1991. g. nastavili su kretanje autobusom sve do mjesta Bijelo Brdo, gdje je autobus zaustavljen u centru mjesta.
There were several other armed men with Milan, whom Mr. Pavošević did not recognise.
S Milanom je bilo još nekoliko naoružanih osoba koje predmetni nije prepoznao.
After some time the remaining persons re-entered the bus together with other men from the building and were taken back to Dalj.
Preostali mještani su nakon nekog vremena uvedeni u autobus zajedno sa ostalim muškarcima iz objekta, da bi nakon toga bili odvezenu nazad u Dalj.
Beside him, among the persons isolated from the bus were RUDOLF and ŽELJKO LOVRIĆ, DALIBOR PRUŽINAC, DANIEL PAVIĆ, ANTUN ANTUNOVIĆ, MARIO LAZAR, TOMO KOVAČEVIĆ and a person he did not know, but who according to his knowledge was living in the area of Novi Dalj.
Osim njega, tada su iz autobusa izdvojeni i RUDOLF i ŽELJKO LOVRIĆ, DALIBOR PRUŽINAC, DANIEL PAVIĆ, ANTUN ANTUNOVIĆ, MARIO LAZAR, TOMO KOVAČEVIĆ i jedna osoba koju predmetni nije poznavao a zna da je nastanjena na području Novi Dalj.
According to Mr. Pavošević, also DRAGO KOVČALIJA was separated from the others and taken by BRANISLAV OCIĆ known as TAŠAK (deceased) to the local community council building, which was used as the headquarters of the Territorial defence Dalj.
Kako predmetni navodi, osim naprijed navedenih izdvojen je i DRAGO KOVČALIJA kojeg je BRANISLAV OCIĆ zv.
Mr. Pavošević recognised at that moment in front of the headquarters of the Territorial defence Dalj ĐORĐE KLAJIĆ known as ĐOKO RUS, VASO GAVRILOVIĆ, NENAD STANOJEVIĆ and BRANKO GOJSOVIĆ (a search warrant has been issued for the latter for the criminal offence under Art. 158 of the Criminal Code), who approached him and without any reason slapped him on the face.
Tad je ispred zgrade TO Dalj predmetni prepoznao i ĐORĐA KLAJIĆ zv.
After coming in the immediate proximity of the Police station he observed significant damage on it, which he thought had been caused by bombardment.
Po dolasku na prostor neposredno ispred Policijske postaje uočio je značajna oštećenja za koja je ocijenio da su posljedica granatiranja objekta.
Nearby he noticed an inhabitant of Dalj known to him as OCIĆ, who was wearing civil clothing.
U neposrednoj blizini zamijetio je mještanina Dalja kojeg poznaje po imenu OCIĆ koji je tu stajao u civilnoj odjeći.
He did not seem to be carrying any weapons and Mr. Pavošević did not have any contact with him.
Kod navedenog nije primijetio naoružanje, niti je s njim stupio u kontakt.
He stated that there were several corpses in the cellar of the Police station, but did not recognised any of them.
Poznato mu je da je u podrumskom dijelu postaje bilo nekoliko beživotnih tijela, no misli da nikoga od tih osoba nije poznavao.
In the courtyard of a house they found the body of a person he recognised as ZDRAVKO KOVČALIJA and the bodies of three or four more persons he did know.
Tu su u jednoj kući, u dvorištu, pronašli tijelo osobe koju je prepoznao kao ZDRAVKA KOVČALIJU, te još tri ili četiri tijela ubijenih osoba koje nije poznavao.
He remembers that an armed man approached the bodies and took a neck chain from one of them.
Sječa se da je tada tijelima prilazio jedan naoružani muškarac koji je s jednog tijela skinuo lančić.
According to the information received during the interview, at the beginning of war operations in Dalj the above mentioned person lived with his family at the current address of residence and worked in the Sloboda bread factory in Osijek.
Prema podacima dobivenim u obavljenom obavijesnom razgovoru, predmetni je početkom oružanih aktivnosti na području mjesta Dalj živio s obitelji na sadašnjoj adresi prebivalište i radio kao uposlenik tvornice kruha Sloboda u Osijeku.
He states that he had no information regarding the attacks and that he did not take part in the defence of the town.
Iznosi da o samim oružanim djelovanjima nema konkretnih saznanja i da nije sudjelovao u obrani mjesta.
According to Mr. Pavošević, the members of the armed forces isolated young men from the crowd and took them to a near-by building.
Tu su pripadnici naoružanih jedinica, kako predmetni navodi, izdvajali mlađe muškarce koje su odveli u obližnji objekt.
The above mentioned person was guarding the persons in front of the building and Mr. Pavošević remembers he had a automatic rifle and visibly hung hand bombs.
Navedeni je naoružan čuvao osobe ispred objekta, a Dragutin se sječa da je imao automatsku pušku i vidljivo istaknute bombe.
He remembers that after being taken out of the bus, a part of the persons was separated, but he could not tell with certainty whether they entered the building or not.
Predmetni se nadalje sječa da je nakon izvođenja iz autobusa jedan dio osoba izdvojen, no ne može sa sigurnošću reći da li su ulazili u objekt ili ne.
He remembers that DAMIR HUBER, PERO IVIĆ, NEDELJKO PUTNIK and KREŠIMIR STRGANAC were among those who were separated from the others and he thought they were transported afterwards as captives to Borovo selo.
Kao izdvojenih se sjeća osoba po imenu DAMIR HUBER, PERO IVIĆ, NEDELJKO PUTNIK i KREŠIMIR STRGANAC za koje misli da su nakon toga odvezene u Borovo selo kao zarobljenici.
After the bus had stopped in the centre of Dalj about ten men were separated from the crowd and the others were taken back to their homes.
Nakon što je autobus zaustavljen u centru mjesta Dalj, 10-tak muškaraca je izdvojeno iz autobusa dok su ostali mještani odvezeni kućama.
Mr. Pavošević states that he was isolated from the others by BORIVOJE MILINKOVIĆ and that he noticed a number of other armed individuals, such as VESELIN AGIĆ, VESA GRUJIĆ, ĐORĐE ČALOŠEVIĆ known as BRIGA and ZORAN ČALOŠEVIĆ known as FAFRIKA.
Predmetni navodi da je njega osobno izdvojio mještanin BORIVOJE MILINKOVIĆ, dok je tada uz njega među naoružanim osobama zamijetio i VESELINA AGIĆ, VESU GRUJIĆ, ĐORĐA ČALOŠEVIĆ zv.
Mr. Pavošević states that probably ANTE RUPČIĆ (deceased) was also separated from the crowd at that occasion and possibly taken away together with Drago Kovčalija, and died at the beginning of September 1991 under suspicious circumstances.
Predmetni iznosi da je tada vjerojatno i izdvojen ANTE RUPČIĆ ( pok.
He remembers that Antunović had to drive the tractor with the trailer towards the Police station, on which trailer Čalošević was seated "feeling all important", as Mr. Pavošević stated.
Navodi da se sječa da je navedeni Antunović određen da vozi traktor s prikolicom na kojem je prema Postaji išao naprijed navedeni Čalošević, kako predmetni iznosi « stajao je sav bitan na prikolici «.
Among the dead he noticed the body of ĐURO BUTRORAC, which was lying in front of the Police station in the Street of Ivan Horvat-Bećar, and another corpse the identity of which was unknown to him and which was lying in the canal along the road on the right.
Od tijela poginulih osoba zamijetio je tijelo ĐURE BUTRORAC koje se nalazilo nasuprot Policijske postaje u ulici Ivana Horvata-Bećara, te jedno tijelo, koje nije prepoznao, u kanalu uz cestu, s desne strane.
He remembers to had recognised the body of JOSIP GLIBUŠIĆ, but he could not remember the exact position thereof.
ječa se da je prepoznao tijelo JOSIPA GLIBUŠIĆ, no ne može se sjetiti gdje se tijelo točno nalazilo.
Furthermore he states that he went together with the others from the Police station towards the exit of Dalj heading to Borovo selo.
Nadalje navodi da je zajedno sa preostalim osobama od prostora Policijske postaje otišao prema izlazu iz mjesta Dalj prema Borovu selu.
Done on 2 November 2007 by officer Tomislav Farkaš in the Police administration of the Osječko-baranjska County, Criminal Police Sector, General Criminalistics Department, War Crimes Section, as regards the interview with Dragutin Pavošević.
Sastavljeno dana 02. studeni 2007. g. po policijskom službeniku Tomislavu Farkaš u prostorijama PU Osječko-baranjske, Sektora krim. policije, Odjela općeg kriminaliteta, Odsjeka ratnih zločina, a u svezi s obavljenim obavijesnim razgovorom sa Dragutin Pavošević.
He thinks that the armed man was living in the area of Dalj and that he knew him as an inhabitant of Dalj, but he was not able to identify him.
Za naoružanu osobu misli da je sa područja Dalja i da ga poznaje kao mještanina, no nisu mu poznati podaci o identitetu te osobe.
Afterwards they went to the house of STJEPAN LIJIĆ, for whom he had known to be a carpenter, and they found his dead body in his house.
Nakon toga otišli su u kuću STJEPANA LIJIĆ, kojeg je predmetni i prije poznavao kao stolara, gdje su u kući pronašli beživotno tijelo istoga.
Older men, women and children remained in front of the building in the centre of the village and Mr. Pavošević recognised MILAN PETKOVIĆ from Bijelo Brdo, whom he had known before the war as a bus driver for the company Panturist.
Stariji muškarci, žene i djeca ostali su ispred objekta u centru sela i tom prilikom je predmetni prepoznao MILANA PETKOVIĆ iz Bijelog Brda za kojeg navodi da ga je do ratnih događanja poznavao kao vozača autobusa u Panturistu.
Then they went to the house of a man of Hungarian nationality for whom he knew to had worked as a driver for the company Autorperatura (IVAN SABO) and there they found his body.
Poslije toga otišli su u kuću mještanina za kojeg predmetni zna da je radio kao vozač Autorperature, mađarske nacionalnosti ( IVAN SABO ) gdje su isto tako pronašli tijelo te osobe.
When asked how they knew where to go and where the dead bodies were located, Mr. Pavošević said that he thought that the above mentioned Čalošević decided in which order and where they would go.
Na postavljeno pitanje kako su dobivali saznanja o lokacijama na koje je potrebno otići i gdje se nalaze tijela ubijenih, predmetni odgovara da misli da je navedeni Čalošević određivao kojim redoslijedom i gdje će ići.
According to Dragutin Pavošević, afterwards they went to the local Orthodox cemetery, where they discovered two coffins containing the bodies of GORAN MIHALJEVIĆ and SLAVKO PUTNIK. The placed the coffin with Mihaljević's body to the trailer and left the coffin with Putnik's body in the mortuary.
Prema iznesenome od strane navedenog Dragutina Pavšević, poslije toga su otišli na mjesno pravoslavno groblje gdje su pronašli dva sanduka sa tijelima GORANA MIHALJEVIĆA i SLAVKA PUTNIKA, te su sanduk sa tijelom Mihaljevića stavili u traktorsku prikolicu, dok su sanduk sa tijelom Putnika ostavili na groblju u mrtvačnici.
Then they went to the house of the RIPIĆ family, where they found a coffin with the body of ANDRIJA RIPIĆ in the courtyard, as well as a few members of his family.
Potom su otišli u kuću obitelji RIPIĆ gdje su u dvorištu zatekli sanduk sa tijelom ANDRIJE RIPIĆ, te u dvorištu nekoga od članova obitelji.
They placed that coffin to the trailer as well and took the bodies to the catholic cemetery.
Taj sanduk su isto tako stavili na traktorsku prikolicu i odvezli tijela na katoličko groblje.
After leaving the coffins in front of the old mortuary, they came back to the centre of Dalj where they found several other corpses in the Elementary school "Božidar Maslarić".
Nakon što su na groblju ostavili tijela pred objektom stare mrtvačnice, vratili su se do centra mjesta Dalj gdje su u Osnovnoj školi « Božidar Maslarić « pronašli još nekoliko tijela ubijenih osoba.
Mr. Pavošević remembers that he noticed a lot of open wounds on the bodies.
Navodi da se sječa da je na tim tijelima uočio dosta otvorenih rana.
He also states that in the hallway they found four naked bodies whom he did not recognise and another body in the gym, whom he also did not recognise.
Predmetni iznosi da su u holu pronašli gola tijela četiri osobe koje nije poznavao, dok su u dvorani pronašli jedno tijelo, isto tako njemu nepoznate osobe.
In the hallway they found the body of JOSIP KEMENJI, whose "face was all disfigured".
U hodniku škole pronašli su beživotno tijelo JOSIPA KEMENJI na kojem je predmetni zapazio « izmasakrirano lice «.
The took the dead bodies to the catholic cemetery, where they left them next to the bodies they had brought earlier, after which they went to their homes in the evening.
Tijela ubijenih odvezli su na katoličko groblje gdje su ih ostavili uz tijela prvotno dovezenih, poslije čega su otišli svojim kućama, već u večernjim satima.
The following day, on 3 August 1991, in the morning hours Mr. Pavošević learned that there was a bus to Osijek and he took that bus, which rode through the Republic of Serbia and Sombor, and met his wife and children in Osijek, who had left Dalj on 1 August 1991 already.
Sutradan, 03. kolovoza 1991. g.
When asked whether he would be willing to repeat the above in front of judicial bodies, Dragutin Pavošević gave an affirmative answer.
Upitan o voljnosti iskazivanja naprijed iznesenoga pred tijelima pravosuđa, Dragutin Pavošević odgovara potvrdno.
I submit this official authority record as a point of information and for further use.
Službenu zabilješku dostavljam znanja radi, kao i mogućnosti daljnjeg korištenja.
Police officer:
Policijski službenik:
After that Mr. Pavošević was conducted by foot together with the above mentioned persons who were taken away from the bus (except from Kovčalija and Rupčić) to the Police station of Dalj.
Nakon toga, predmetni je zajedno sa preostalim naprijed navedenim osobama izvedenim iz autobus ( osim Kovčalije i Rupčića ) odveden, pješice, do Policijske postaje Dalj.
After placing the corpses found in the Elementary school on the trailer, they went to the bakery in the current street of B.J. Jelačić, in which they found two more bodies.
Kada su u traktorsku prikolicu unijeli tijela ubijenih iz Osnovne škole, otišli su do pekarske radnje u sadašnjoj ulici B.