natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In cases when data is collected with consent of the examinee, the examinee has a right to withdraw his/her consent in any time and request cease of further processing of his/her data, except if the data is processed for statistical purposes when personal data cannot enable the identification of the person they are related to.
U slučaju kada se podaci prikupljaju uz privolu ispitanika, ispitanik ima pravo u svako doba odustati od dane privole i zatražiti prestanak daljnje obrade njegovih podataka, osim ako se radi o obradi podataka u statističke svrhe kada osobni podaci više ne omogućuju identifikaciju osobe na koju se odnose.
In cases mentioned the data processing must be specially marked and protected.
U navedenim slučajevima obrada podataka mora biti posebno označena i zaštićena.
1. A certificate regarding the processing or non-processing of personal data which relate to him/her,
1. dostaviti potvrdu o tome da li se osobni podaci koji se odnose na njega obrađuju ili ne,
2. A notice in a reasonable form about the data which relate to him/her and are being processed, as well as of the source of such data,
2. dati obavijest u razumljivom obliku o podacima koji se odnose na njega čija je obrada u tijeku te o izvoru tih podataka,
3. Ensure insight into the records of the personal data collection and into the personal data included in the personal data collection which are related to him/her and their copying,
3. omogućiti uvid u evidenciju zbirke osobnih podataka te uvid u osobne podatke sadržane u zbirci osobnih podataka koji se odnose na njega te njihovo prepisivanje,
4. Deliver excerpts, certificates or listings of personal data contained in the personal data collection related to him/her, and which must contain the statement of purpose and a legal base for collecting, processing and use of such data.
4. dostaviti izvatke, potvrde ili ispise osobnih podataka sadržanih u zbirci osobnih podataka koji se na njega odnose, a koji moraju sadržavati i naznaku svrhe i pravnog temelja prikupljanja, obrade i kori tenja tih podataka,
5. Deliver a listing of data on who and for which purposes and according to which legal base was allowed to use personal data relating to him/her,
5. dostaviti ispis podataka o tome tko je i za koje svrhe i po kojem pravnom temelju dobio na kori tenje osobne podatke koji se odnose na njega,
6. Give information on logic behind any automatic processing of data relating to him/her.
6. dati obavijest o logici bilo koje automatske obrade podataka koja se na njega odnosi.
Agency for Personal Data Protection has been established by the Personal Data Protection Act for the purposes of supervision of data processing.
Za obavljanje nadzora nad obradom osobnih podataka Zakonom o zaštiti osobnih podataka osnovana je Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka.
Funds for the operation of the Agency are ensured by the State Budget of the Republic of Croatia.
Sredstva za rad Agencije osiguravaju se u državnom proračunu Republike Hrvatske.
The organisational structure and modes of operation of the Agency is determined by its Statute which is approved by the Croatian Parliament.
Ustrojstvo i način rada Agencije uređuje se Statutom Agencije koji potvrđuje Hrvatski sabor.
The Agency is obligated to submit a report about its work to the Croatian Parliament upon request, and at least once a year.
Agencija je dužna podnijeti izvješće o svojem radu Hrvatskom saboru na njegov zahtjev, a najmanje jednom na godinu.
Accessibility
Dostupnost
Regulation on Principles for Internal Organisation of State Administration Bodies (Official Gazette, number 43/01, 8/04) regulates working hours schedule (weekly and daily working hours and daily break), working days and office hours for working with citizens and other parties.
Uredbom o načelima za unutarnje ustrojstvo tijela državne uprave („Narodne novine, broj 43/01, 8/04) uređuje se raspored radnog vremena (tjedno i dnevno radno vrijeme te dnevni odmor), održavanje uredovnih dana i uredovno vrijeme za rad sa građanima i drugim strankama.
In addition, it is proscribed that State Administration Bodies have to inform the public about the working hours through public announcements, bulletin boards of state administration bodies or in another appropriate way.
Također je propisano da su tijela državne uprave dužna putem sredstava javnog priopćavanja, na oglasnim pločama tijela državne uprave, odnosno na drugi prikladan način obavijestiti javnost o radnom vremenu tijela državne uprave, odnosno uredovnom vremenu za rad sa građanima i drugim strankama.
The State Administration System Act (Official Gazette, no.
U Zakonu o sustavu državne uprave („Narodne novine“ br.
75/93, 92/96, 48/99, 15/2000, 127/2000, 59/2001, 199/2003 and 79/2007) in the part which regulates the relationship between the state administration bodies and citizens, among other things it is stated that state administration bodies are obligated to inform the public on performing tasks within its competence and report about their work through mass media or in another appropriate way.
75/93, 92/96, 48/99, 15/2000, 127/2000, 59/2001, 199/2003 i 79/2007) u dijelu kojim se uređuju odnosi tijela državne uprave i građana, između ostalog je navedeno da su tijela državne uprave dužna upoznati javnost o obavljanju poslova iz svog djelokruga i izvješćivati o svom radu putem sredstava javnog priopćavanja ili na drugi prikladan način.
Ministers, state secretaries of central state offices, directors of state administrative organisations, heads of state administration offices in regional self government units, or a civil servant whom they authorise, can hold press conferences on important issues regarding the operation of state administration.
Ministri, državni tajnici središnjih državnih ureda, ravnatelji državnih upravnih organizacija, predstojnici ureda državne uprave u jedinicama područne (regionalne) samouprave, odnosno državni službenik kojeg oni ovlaste, mogu o značajnijim pitanjima obavljanja poslova državne uprave održavati konferencije s predstavnicima sredstava javnog priopćavanja.
Ministers, state secretaries of central state offices, directors of state administrative organisations may decide to publish in the mass media, and invite all interested parties to offer suggestions regarding the drafts of regulations they have prepared which the public considers specially interesting,
Ministri, državni tajnici središnjih državnih ureda, odnosno ravnatelji državnih upravnih organizacija mogu odlučiti da se nacrti propisa koje pripremaju, a za koje je javnost osobito zainteresirana, objave putem sredstava javnog priopćavanja, kao i da se pozovu svi zainteresirani da na nacrt propisa iznesu svoje primjedbe.
Right to a hearing
Pravo na saslušanje
- who and how the administrative procedure is initiated
- tko i kako započinje upravni postupak
According to the provisions of the Article 40, paragraph 1
Prema odredbama članka 40. stavak 1.
of LGAP, is initiated by the request of the party or by official duty.
ZUP-a, upravni postupka pokreće se na zahtjev stranke ili po službenoj dužnosti.
of LGAP, when the procedure is initiated upon the request of the party, it is considered that the procedure has been started from the moment of the submittal of a valid request to the public legal body.
ZUP-a, kad se postupak pokreće na zahtjev stranke, postupak se smatra pokrenutim u trenutku predaje urednog zahtjeva stranke javnopravnome tijelu.
of LGAP, when the procedure is initiated by official duty, it is considered that the procedure is started when the official person in the public legal body acts in any way with a purpose to carry out a procedure by official duty.
ZUP-a, kad se postupak pokreće po službenoj dužnosti, postupak se smatra pokrenutim kad službena osoba u javnopravnom tijelu poduzme bilo koju radnju sa svrhom vođenja postupka po službenoj dužnosti.
- who has a right to submitt facts, arguments or evidence in the case
- tko ima pravo podnijeti činjenice, argumente ili dokaze u slučaju
- is there any responsibility of the administrative body to inform the person in question that the administrative procedure is initiated and how is this implemented in cases with large numbers of people are in question.
- postoji li odgovornosti upravnog tijela da informira osobu koja je u pitanju da je započet upravni postupka i kako se to provodi u slučaju kada je u pitanju veliki broj ljudi
- is there a possibility for oral hearing
- postoji li mogućnost usmenog saslušanja
- as citizens they can acquire information in possession of administrative government
- kao građani mogu doći do informacija koje su u posjedu upravnih vlasti
- with a consent of the examinee, only for the purpose for which the consent was given, or - in cases proscribed by the law, or - for the purpose of fulfilling legal obligations of the personal data filing system controller, or - for the purpose of signing or executing a contract in which the examinee is a party, or - for the purpose of life or physical integrity protection of the examinee or another person in case when the examinee is not capable physically or legally to give his/her consent, or - if the data processing is necessary to perform tasks executed in the public interest or during exercise of public competences held by the personal data filing system controller collection, or - if the examinee has published the data him/herself
- uz privolu ispitanika samo u svrhu za koju je ispitanik dao privolu, ili - u slučajevima određenim zakonom, ili - u svrhu izvršavanja zakonskih obveza voditelja zbirke osobnih podataka, ili - u svrhu sklapanja i izvršenja ugovora u kojem je ispitanik stranka, ili - u svrhu zaštite života ili tjelesnog integriteta ispitanika ili druge osobe u slučaju kada ispitanik fizički ili pravno nije u mogućnosti dati svoj pristanak, ili - ako je obrada podataka nužna radi ispunjenja zadataka koji se izvršavaju u javnom interesu ili u izvršavanju javnih ovlasti koje ima voditelj zbirke osobnih podataka, ili - ako je ispitanik sam objavio te podatke.
This Agency has reviewed the text of the document delivered and from the point of personal data protection we can state that this document contains all necessary principles of personal data protection according to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Convention 108), and according to all other valid regulations by which standards of personal data protection are set.
Ova Agencija razmotrila je tekst dostavljenog dokumenta te sa stajališta zaštite osobnih podataka možemo navesti kako isti dokument sadrži sva potrebna načela zaštite osobnih podataka u smislu Konvencije za zaštitu osoba glede automatizirane obrade osobnih podataka (Konvencija 108), odnosno u smislu drugih važećih pravnih akata u okviru kojih su postavljeni standardi zaštite osobnih podataka.
In addition, the same item of the document stipulates the principle of a general prohibition of processing so-called "sensitive data", which we consider important having in mind the development of highly sophisticated information and communication technologies which allow collection and processing of a large quantities of personal data, sensitive data included, without the knowledge of the individual.
Također, u istoj točci predmetnog dokumenta određena je i načelna zabrana obrade tzv. osjetljivih podataka („sensitive data“), što smatramo važnim navođenjem obzirom na razvoj visoko sofisticiranih informacijskih i komunikacijskih tehnologija, pomoću kojih se može prikupljati i obrađivati veliki broj osobnih podataka, pa tako i osjetljivih podataka bez znanja pojedinca.
Furthermore, information are listed which the personal data filing system controller should provide to the examinee regarding collection and processing of his/her personal data in the context of profiling (item 4 and item 5 in the document), which is also in accordance with the basic principles of personal data protection set in the legal framework regulating personal data protection.
Dalje, navode se informacije koje voditelj zbirke osobnih podataka u kontekstu profiliranja treba pružiti ispitaniku te prava ispitanika odnosno na prikupljanje i obradu njegovih osobnih podataka u kontekstu profiliranja (točka 4. i točka 5. dokumenta), što je također sukladno temeljnim načelima zaštite osobnih podataka postavljenima u pravnom okviru zaštite osobnih podataka.
and a series of different data (data on the consumers' habits, their behaviour, lifestyle and daily activities).
„traffic data“), te čitav niz različitih podataka (primjerice podaci o potrošačkim navikama, odnosno ponašanjima kupaca, njihovom načinu života i uobičajenim aktivnostima).
of LGAP, during the procedure the party must be enabled to give a statement on all facts, circumstances and legal matters relevant for reaching a decision regarding the administrative matter.
ZUP-a, u postupku stranci se mora omogućiti izjašnjavanje o svim činjenicama, okolnostima i pravnim pitanjima važnim za rješavanje upravne stvari.
According to the provision of the Article 83, paragraph 1
Prema odredi članka 83. stavak 1.
Time limitation
Vremensko ograničenje
Administrative decisions
Upravne odluke
- how do the decisions must be reached
- kako se moraju donositi upravne odluke
- how is a person informed, especially if a larger number of people participate in the procedure
- kako se obavještava osoba, posebno ako u postupku sudjeluje veći broj ljudi
Administrative sanctions
Upravne sankcije
- in which circumstances administrative sanctions can be imposed, what sanctions are explicitly proscribed by the law
- u kojim okolnostima se mogu nametnuti sankcije, koje su sankcije izričito propisane zakonom
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MUNICIPAL CIVIL COURT IN ZAGREB
REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA OPĆINSK1 GRADANSKI SUD U ZAGREBU
Office of the president of the court Number: 9Su-2840/10 Zagreb, 1st September 2010
tired predsjednice suda Broj:9Su-2840/10 Zagreb, 01. rujna 20J0.g.
Ministry of Justice
Ministarstvo pravosuđa
To attn. of the director
n/r ravnateljice
Mrs. Diana Kovačević Remenarić
gđe Diane Kovacevic Remenarić
Protocol number:
Ur. broj:
Dear Madam,
Poštovani,
with reference to your letter received by the Office of the president of the court on 31st August 2010 as regards the case under the responsibility of this court with file number
vezano za Vasu predslavku, zaprimljenu u Uredu predsjednice suda dana 31. kolovoza 2010. godine u vezi sa postupanjem u predmetu koji se vodi kod ovog suda pod postupak. broj em:
Ps-1200/90, we would like to inform you that we have taken the said file of this Court and the decision of the hearing judge of the into examination on 1st September 2010.
Ps-1200/90 izvješćujemo Vas da smo izvršili uvid u navedeni spis ovog Suda i očitovanje raspravne sutkinje od 01. rujna 2010. godine.
Thereafter we have established that:
Po uvidu je utvrđeno sljedeće:
- the plaintiffs Bosiljka Kolarov and Bogdan Vidaković initiated the court proceedings by means of the lawsuit filed on 31st July 1989 against the defendant Štefica Puch due to the annulment of their tenancy right to the 3-room apartment located on the ground floor in Dvorničićeva street No 25 in Zagreb and the eviction there from,
-da su tužitelji Bosiljka Kolarov i Bogdan Vidaković pokrenuli parnični postupak tužbom od 31. srpnja 1989.g. protiv sluzenice Štefice Puch radi otkaza stanarskog prava na trosobnom stanu u prizemlju zgrade u Zagrebu, Dvorniciceva 25 i iseljenja iz istog,
- at the hearing of 12th October 1989 the defendant submitted her response to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs gave their statement as to her response and the need for a probatory hearing of the parties and the presentation of the document No Rl-2042/84 for the purpose of examination thereof has been established,
-da je na ročištu 12. listopada 1989.g. sluzenica podnijela odgovor na tužbu, tužitelji su se očilovali na taj odgovor le je utvrđena potreba za izvođenjem dokaza saslušanjem stranaka kao i prijavom spisa Rl-2042/84 radi uvida u isti,
- on 22nd January 1990 the document No Rl-2042/84 was examined,
-daje 22. siječnja 1990.g. izvršen uvid u predmet Rl -2042/84,
- on 21st March 1990 the plaintiffs were invited to submit the correct R1 file number since the examined file was not connected to the case concerned,
-da su tužitelji 21. ožujka 1990.g. pozvani očitovali se o točnom broju Rl predmeta, jer predmet u koji je izvršen uvid nije bio u vezi sa ovom pravom stvari ,
- by means of the letter of 2nd April 1990 the plaintiffs submitted the correct file number to be examined, which was R1-242/84,
-da su tužitelji podneskom od 2. travnja 1990.g. dostavili podatak o točnom broju predmeta u koji su predložili izvršili uvid - Rl-242/84,
- on 14th May 1990 the file No. R1-242/84 was examined,
-daje 14. svibnja 1990.g. priklopljen predmet Rl-242/84,
- on 25th June 1990 the main hearing was held and concluded,
-daje 25. lipnja 1990.g. provedena i zaključena glavna rasprava,
- on 25th June 1990 the claim of the plaintiffs was rejected,
-daje presudom od 25. lipnja 1990.g. odbijen tužbeni zahtjev,
-on 23rd July 1990 the plaintiffs appealed against the above decision and on 25th September 1990 the defendant submitted her response thereto,
-da su tužitelji 23. srpnja 1990.g. podnijeli žalbu protiv navedene presude, a sluzenica 25. rujna I990.g. odgovor na žalbu,
- on 16th October 1990 the District court in Zagreb repealed the decision of the Court of first instance and returned the case for repeated proceedings,
-daje 16. listopada 1990.g. rješenjem Okružnog suda u Zagrebu ukinuta prvostupanjska presuda i predmet vraćen na ponovno suđenje,
- the hearing fixed for 9th July 1991 was postponed upon proposal of the defendant and the defendant was grant a time-limit of 15 days to submit her response and proposal,
-daje ro6isle zakazano za dan 9. srpnja 1991.g. odgođeno na prijedlog sluzenice i istoj je određen rok od 15 dana radi očitovanja i isticanja prijedloga,
- on 5th November 1991 a request was sent to the Municipal Court in Bačka Palanka for the hearing of the plaintiffs,
-da je 5. studenog 1991.g.
- on 5th October 1998 the plaintiffs notified their new attorney to the court,
-da su tužitelji 5, listopada 1998.g. obavijestili sud o novom punomoćniku,
- at the hearing held on 17th April 2000 it was concluded that the request of 5th November 1991 was not executed,
-daje na ročištu održanom 17. travnja 2000.g. konstatirano da po zamolnici od 5. studenog 1991 .g. nije poslupljeno,
- on 15th November 2000 the plaintiffs were sent via diplomatic channels the summons for the hearing fixed for 8th November 2001,
-da je 15. studenog 2000.g. otpremljen poziv tužiteljima u inozemstvo (diplomatskim putem) za ročiste koje je zakazano za dan 8. studenog 2001 .g.,
- by means of the decision of 31st October 2001 it was decided that the hearing fixed for 8th November 2001 would not be held and the next hearing was fixed for 7th December 2001,
-daje rješenjem od 31. listopada 2001.g. odlučeno da se ročište zakazano za dan 8. studeni 200l.g. neće održati, a iduće je ročište zakazano za dan 7. prosinac 200l.g.,
- at the hearing of 25th March 2002 a testimony was given by one witness and the plaintiff Bogdan Vidaković and the next hearing was fixed for 27th September 2002 in order to hear the testimony of the defendant, whilst the plaintiffs were invited to notify the above hearing to Ljeposava Milaković in order to attend it,
-da je na ročištu 25. ožujka 2002.g. izveden dokaz saslušanjem jednog svjedoka te tuzitelj a Bogdana Vidakovica i iduće je zakazano za dan 27. rujan 2002.g., a radi sasiusanja tuzenice, time da su tužitelji pozvani obavijestili o tom rocistu Ljeposavu Milakovic radi pristupa na isto,
- on 17th October 2002 the request for the hearing of the witness Ljeposava Milaković and for the collection of her authentic signature was sent,
-da je 17. listopada 2002.g. sačinjena zamolnica po pitanju saslušanja svjedoka Ljeposava Milakovic te uzimanja njezinih nespornih potpisa,
- by means of the decision of 28th November 2002 it was decided that the hearing fixed for 5th December 2002 would not be held and the next hearing was fixed for 27th January 2003,
-da je rješenjem od 28. studenog 2002.g. odlučeno da se ročište zakazano za dan 5. prosinac 2002.g. neće održati, a iduće je zakazano za dan 27. siječanj 2003.g.,
- in her letter of 10th April 2003 the defendant gave a detailed statement and proposed, inter alia, that a handwriting analysis is performed on the signature of Ljeposava Milaković, and submitted detailed documentation,
-da se tuženica u podnesku od 10. travnja 2003.g. detaljnije očitovala te predložila, između ostalog, izvođenje dokaza grafoloskim vjestačenjem potpisa Ljeposave Milakovic te dostavila opseznu dokumentaciju,
- the new hearing fixed for 8th May 1991 was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the defendant,
-da je ročište zakazano za dan 8. svibnja 1991.g. odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za tuženicu,
- at the hearing of 27th January 2003 the defendant gave her testimony, whilst the plaintiffs filed a letter with detailed statement and the final claim; therefore the hearing was concluded and the next hearing was fixed for 15th May 2003 on which the testimony of a witness would be collected,
-da je 27. siječnja 2003.g. održano ročiste na kojem je izveden dokaz saslušanjem tuzenice, a tužitelji su predali u spis podnesak kojim se detaljnije očituju i postavljaju konačan tužbeni zahtjev, slijedom čega je ročište odgođeno, a iduće zakazano za dan 15. svibanj 2003.g., na kojem je određeno izvesti dokaz saslušanjem jednog svjedoka,
- at the hearing of 27th September 2002 the plaintiffs submitted the statement of Ljeposava Milaković of 15th April 2002; the hearing concerned was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the defendant and the next hearing was fixed for 5th December 2002; at the same time it was laid down to collect the probatory statement of the witness Ljeposava Milaković by means of a request addressed to the foreign competent court and to collect her authentic signature,
-da su tužitelji na rocistu 27. rujna 2002.g. predali izjavu Ljeposave Milakovic od 15. travnja 2002.g., koje ročište je odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za tuzenicu, a iduće je zakazano za dan 5. prosinac 2002.g., time da je istovremeno određeno izvođenje dokaza saslušanjem svjedoka Ljeposave Milakovic zamolbenim putem preko nadležnog suda u inozemstvu te poradi uzimanja njezinih nespornih potpisa,
- at the hearing held on 7th December 2001 a testimony was given by the plaintiff Bosiljka Kolarov, who informed the court in that occasion that the plaintiff Bogdan Vidaković lived in England and proposed that the defendant alone should be invited at the next hearing and that her former attorney should testify concerning the circumstances of the presentation of the supplement to the lawsuit; therefore the hearing was concluded and the next hearing was fixed for 25th March 2002,
-da je na ročištu održanom 7. prosinca 2001.g. izveden dokaz saslušanjem tužitelj ice Bosiljke Kolarov, koja je na rocistu obavijestila sud o tome da tužitelj Bogdan Vidaković ima adresu stanovanja u Engleskoj te predložila da se na iduće ročište pozove samo tuženica te da se izvede dokaz saslušanjem njezina bivšeg punomoćnika na okolnost priloga uz tužbu, slijedom čega je ročište odgođeno i iduće zakazano za dan 25. ožujak 2002.g.,
- the hearing fixed for 15th May 2003 was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the witness Anica Schmit and the plaintiffs submitted their application to the file,
-da je ročište zakazano za dan 15. svibanj 2003.g. odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za svjedoka (Anica Schmit), a tužitelji su u spis istom prilikom predali podnesak,
- on 27th November 2003 a letter from the Municipal court in Sombor was received,
-da je 27. studenog 2003.g. primljen dopis Opcinskog suda u Somboru,
- by means of the decision of 3rd December 2003 the plaintiffs were requested to submit the authenticated translation of the above letter, which was complied with on 12th January 2004,
-da su tužitelji rješenjem od 3. prosinca 2003.g. pozvani dostaviti oyjereni prijevod gore navedenog dopisa, sukladno kojem traženju su postupili 12. siječnja 2004.g.,