natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
thus, breaching the rules of the international law in war time, although he was obligated to do so, he omitted to prevent it and in the manner already described supported the unselective attack which hit the civilians killing them and inflicting severe bodily injuries, inhumane treatment, forced displacement, looting of their property and unlawful and arbitrary destruction of property on a large scale which was not justified by military purposes, and breaching the rules of the international law during war time, although he was obligated, omitted to prevent destruction of cultural and historical monuments,
dakle, kršeći pravila međunarodnog prava za vrijeme oružanog sukoba, iako je bio dužan propustio je spriječiti te na opisani način podržavao napad bez izbora cilja kojim se pogađa civilno stanovništvo, da se civilno stanovništvo ubija, da mu se nanose teške tjelesne ozljede, da se prema njemu nečovječno postupak da se provodi raseljavanje, da se pljačka imovina stanovništva te protuzakonito i samovoljno uništava imovina velikih razmjera što nije opravdano vojnim potrebama, te je kršeći pravila međunarodnog prava za vrijeme oružanog sukoba iako je bio dužan propustio spriječiti da se uništavaju kulturni i povijesni spomenici,
Data of the ACI Marina Miho Pracat in Komolac on stolen and damaged ships
podaci ACI marine Miho Pracat u Komolcu o otuđenim i oštećenim brodovima,
List by the Dubrovnik Port Captaincy - Branch Office Cavtat on damaged, stolen and destroyed marine vehicles,
Popis Lučke kapetanije Dubrovnik - ispostava Cavtat o oštećenim, otuđenim i uništenim plovilima,
to set detention for all defendants, pursuant to article
da se protiv svih okrivljenika odredi pritvor temeljem čl.
102, paragraph 1, items 1 and 4
102.st.1.t.1.i 4.
of the Criminal Procedure Act and to issue a warrant,
ZKP-a te raspiše tjeralica,
The investigating judge of the County Court in Dubrovnik has conducted an investigation against the defendants Jevrem Cokić, Mile Ružinovski, Pavle Strugar, Miodrag Jokić, Branko Stanković, Obrad Vičić, Radovan Komar, Vladimir Kovačević, Milan Zec and Zoran Gvozdenović based on reasonable suspicion that they have committed the crimes as factually described and legally qualified in the dispositive part of this indictment.
Istražni sudac Županijskog suda u Dubrovniku proveo je istražni postupak protiv okrivljenih Jevrem Cokić, Mile Ružinovski, Pavle Strugar, Miodrag Jokić, Branka Stankovića, Obrad Vičić, Radovan Komar, Vladimir Kovačević, Milan Zec i Zorana Gvozdenovića zbog osnovane sumnje da su počinili kaznena djela činjenično opisana i pravno kvalificirana kao u dispozitivu ove optužnice.
In the course of the investigation, the defendants Jevrem Cokić, Mile Ružinovski, Pavle Strugar, Miodrag Jokić, Branko Stanković, Obrad Vičić, Radovan Komar, Vladimir Kovačević and Milan Zec were not questioned, as their whereabouts are on unknown addresses outside of the Republic of Croatia and they are not available to our criminal prosecution bodies.
Tijekom istražnog postupka nisu ispitani okrivljeni Jevrem Cokić, Mile Ružinovski, Pavle Strugar, Miodrag Jokić, Branka Stankovića, Obrad Vičić, Radovan Komar, Vladimir Kovačević i Milan Zec jer se nalaze na nepoznatim adresama izvan Republike Hrvatske i nisu dostupni našim organima kaznenog progona.
By means of international legal aid, we have questioned the defendant Zoran Gvozdenović, who refused to state his defence or answer the questions asked, ie. he chose to defend himself by silence.
Putem međunarodne pravne pomoći ispitali smo okrivljenog Zoran Gvozdenović koji nije htio iznositi svoju obranu niti odgovarati na postavljena pitanja tj. branio se šutnjom.
Operational Group of the ex JNA and attack parts of Konavle from the Adriatic motorway to the border with Bosnia and Herzegovina, and regardless of the fact that he witnessed, while visiting the occupied areas, that units under his command excessively and unselectively with artillery weapons and mine throwers, shelled populated villages, killing civilians who should be protected from any kind of violence originating from military operations, detained them, harassed and forced them to flee, and upon entrance into populated villages destroyed civil, culture and business objects, loot them and set on fire thus acting against the provisions of the Article 3, paragraph 1, item 1 and paragraph 2, items a, 27, 32, 33 and 53
Operativne grupe bivše JNA napadaju dijelove Konavala od Jadranske magistrale do granice sa Bosnom i Hercegovinom, pa iako je obilazio napadnuta i okupirana područja u uvjerio se da njemu podređene postrojbe prekomjerno i bez izbora cilja artiljerijskim oružjem i minobacačima granatiraju naselja i ubijaju civilno stanovništvo koje je moralo biti zaštićeno od svakog nasilja koje proizlazi iz vojnih operacija zatvaraju ga, maltretiraju i natjeravaju ga u bijeg, a po ulasku u naseljena mjesta ruše civilne, kulturne i gospodarske objekte, pljačkaju ih i pale te da postupaju protivno odredbama čl.3. st.1.t.1. i st.2.t.a, 27., 32., 33. i 53.
Against the defendants Pavle Strugar and Miodrag Jokić, criminal procedures were conducted by the International Tribunal in The Hague for the war crimes committed in the shelling of Dubrovnik on 6th December 1991 by the former JNA units, and in those cases, a valid sentence of unconditional prison was imposed.
Protiv okrivljenih Pavla Strugara i Miodraga Jokića pred Međunarodnim sudom u Hagu vođeni su kazneni postupci zbog kaznenih djela ratnog zločina počinjenih bombardiranjem Dubrovnika 6. prosinca 1991. od strane jedinica bivše JNA i u tim predmetima istima su pravomoćno izrečene bezuvjetne kazne zatvora.
Therefore, the defendants Pavle Strugar and Miodrag Jokić are not charged for this event in this indictment.
Zbog toga se ovom optužnicom okrivljenima Pavlu Strugaru i Miodragu Jokiću ne stavlja na terete taj događaj.
Protocol additional to the Geneva conventions of 12 August 1949 and related to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I), although he was obligated to do so he omitted to perform actions in order to prevent such illegal behaviour and sanction the perpetrators, instead by behaving as he did, supported such behaviour, allowing units under his superior authority to continue such activities and agreed to the consequences of such actions, so the presently unknown members of units under his command in the field and during the period previously mentioned, from artillery and infantry weapons killed 10 civilians:
Dopunskog protokola Ženevskim konvencijama od 12. kolovoza 1949. o zaštiti žrtava međunarodnih oružanih sukoba (Protokol I ), premda je bio dužan nije ništa poduzeo da se takvo nedopušteno ponašanje spriječi i počinitelji kazne, već je takvim svojim ponašanjem to podržavao, pristajući da njemu podređene vojne postrojbe nastave s takvim postupanjem i pristao na njihove posljedice pa su tako za sada nepoznati pripadnici njemu podređene postrojbi na terenu u naznačenom vremenu iz artiljerijskog i pješačkog oružja ubili 10 civilnih osoba
With regard of the defendant Vladimir Kovačević, nicknamed Rambo, commander of the 3rd battalion of the 472nd Motor Brigade, charged with the shelling of Dubrovnik on 6th December 1991, the International Criminal Tribunal has ceded criminal prosecution to the War Crimes Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Serbia, which indicted the above named for war crimes against the civilian population on 26th July 2007, based on article
U odnosu na okrivljenog Vladimira Kovačevića zvanog Rambo, zapovjednika 3. bataljuna 472. mtbr, koji se tereti za granatiranje Dubrovnika 6. prosinca 1991., Međunarodni sud u Hagu ustupio je kazneni progon Tužilaštvu za ratne zločine Republike Srbije koje je 26. srpnja 2007. protiv istog podiglo optužnicu zbog kaznenog djela ratnog zločina protiv civilnog stanovništva iz čl.
142, paragraph 2 , in relation with paragraph 1
142.st.2. u vezi sa st.1.
of the Criminal Act of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, in relation with article
Krivičnog zakona Savezne Republike Jugoslavije u vezi sa čl.
There was no first instance judgement in this case, nor has a main hearing been set up at this point, for reasons of the alleged mental illness of the defendant. Thus, this criminal procedure represents no obstruction to conduct a criminal procedure against him in the Republic of Croatia.
U tom predmetu nije donesena prvostupanjska presuda niti je do sada zakazana glavna rasprava, zbog navodnog psihičkog oboljenja okrivljenika i taj kazneni postupak ne predstavlja zapreku da se protiv njega u Republici Hrvatskoj provede kazneni postupak.
- partially destroyed, set on fire and looted villages Ljuta, Gruda, Zastolje, Kuna, Komaje, Lovorno, Pridvorje, Mihanići, Drvenik, Gabrile, Uskoplje, Čilipe, Močiće, Zvekovica, Obod, Duba, Plat causing large scale damages and forced displacement of 3649 residents, and destroyed the Čilipi airport completely, and took from there equipment and vehicles in the value of 10,500,000 Deutch Marks.
-djelomično razrušile, zapalile i opljačkale mjesta Ljuta, Gruda, Zastolje, Kuna, Komaje, Lovorno, Pridvorje, Mihanići, Drvenik, Gabrile, Uskoplje, Čilipe, Močiće, Zvekovicu, Obod, Duba, Plat počinivši štetu velikih razmjera te iz istih protjerale 3649 stanovnika a potpunosti uništili Zračnu luku Čilipi i iz iste otuđili opreme i vozila u vrijednosti 10.500,000,00 DEM
Before stating the facts which lead us to believe that during the attack of the former JNA, war crimes have been committed in the Dubrovnik area, we deem it necessary to briefly describe the circumstances prior to the attack of the former JNA and the goal of that attack.
Prije iznošenja činjenica temeljem kojih smatramo da su na Dubrovačkom području tijekom agresije bivše JNA počinjeni ratni zločini smatramo da je potrebno ukratko navesti okolnosti koje su prethodile agresiji bivše JNA i cilju te agresije.
In the course of 1991, the referendums on independence conducted in the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Slovenia lead to the break-up of former Yugoslavia.
Naime, tijekom 1991. došlo je to raspada bivše Jugoslavije temeljem referenduma o nezavisnosti provedenih u Republici Hrvatskoj i Republici Sloveniji.
The referendum in the Republic of Croatia showed Croatia's wish for independence. Thus, on 21st June 1991,
Referendum u Republici Hrvatskoj 25. travnja 1991. pokazao je da Republika Hrvatska želi biti neovisna pa je 21. lipnja 1991.
the Croatian Parliament reached the decision on the sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Croatia, and on 8th October 1991,
Hrvatski sabor donio odluku o suverenitetu i nezavisnosti Republike Hrvatske a 8. listopada 1991.
the Republic of Croatia declared its independence.
Republika Hrvatska je proglasila neovisnost.
Before the attack of the former JNA on the Republic of Croatia, the Presidency of Yugoslavia had control over the armed forces of the former JNA and the territorial defence of Yugoslavia, and before the declaration of independence of the Republic of Croatia, the former JNA units attacked the city of Vukovar with armed forces, under the pretence of defending the Serbs in Croatia from the "Ustasha regime", aided by the propaganda of the Greater-Serbian nationalists, who claimed that Yugoslavia could only fall apart in the way that all territories of former Yugoslavia with Serbian population would become part of the Republic of Serbia.
Prije napada bivše JNA na Republiku Hrvatsku kontrolu nad oružanim snagama bivše JNA i teritorijalne obrane Jugoslavije imalo je predsjedništvo SFRJ a prije proglašenja neovisnosti Republike Hrvatske jedinice bivše JNA oružanim snagama su napale grad Vukovar pod izgovorom da brane Srbe u Hrvatskoj od „ustaškog režima“, potpomognute propagandom velikosrpskih nacionalista koji su tvrdili da se Jugoslavija jedino može raspasti na način da Republici Srbiji pripadnu svi oni teritoriji bivše Jugoslavije na kojima su živjeli Srbi.
That was the excuse for the creation of the so-called Greater Serbia on the territory of the former Yugoslavia,
Ovo je bio izgovor da se nakon raspada SFRJ na njezinom području stvori tzv.
after its break-up.
Velika Srbija.
According to the latest population census, there were less than 5% Serbs in the Dubrovnik area, and their rights were by no means threatened. For this reason, the attack of the former JNA units on this area was justified by the attack of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Croatia on Montenegro, with the intention of conquering the Boka Kotorska Bay.
Po posljednjem popisu stanovništva na Dubrovačkom području živjelo je manje od 5 % Srba i njihova prava ničim nisu bila ugrožena pa se stoga napad jedinica bivše JNA na ovo područje opravdavao navodnim napadom Oružanih snaga Republike Hrvatske na Crnu Goru u namjeri zauzimanja Boko kotorskog zaljeva.
thus, breaching the rules of the international law in war time, although he was obligated to do so, he omitted to prevent it and in the manner already described supported the unselective attack which hit the civilians, to kill the killing them and inflicting severe bodily injuries, inhumane treatment, forced displacement, looting of their property and unlawful and arbitrary destruction of property on a large scale which was not justified by military purposes, and breaching the rules of the international law during war time, although he was obligated to do so, he omitted to prevent destruction of cultural and historical monuments,
dakle, kršeći pravila međunarodnog prava za vrijeme oružanog sukoba, iako je bio dužan propustio je spriječiti te na opisani način podržavao napad bez izbora cilja kojim se pogađa civilno stanovništvo, da se civilno stanovništvo ubija, da mu se nanose teške tjelesne ozljede da se prema njemu nečovječno postupak da se provodi raseljavanje, da se pljačka imovina stanovništva te protuzakonito i samovoljno uništava imovina velikih razmjera što nije opravdano vojnim potrebama, te je kršeći pravila međunarodnog prava za vrijeme oružanog sukoba iako je bio dužan propustio spriječiti da se uništavaju kulturni i povijesni spomenici,
Thus, on 1st October 1991, in the Montenegro Government headquarters, the defendant Pavle Strugar, the then-commander of the Montenegro Territorial Defense, along with the President of Montenegro, Momir Bulatović, announced that Montenegro had been attacked, ie. that around 30 000 Ustashas were ready to attack Montenegro.
Tako je 1. listopada 1991. u sjedištu Vlade Crne Gore, okrivljeni Pavle Strugar koji je tada bio zapovjednik TO Crne Gore, zajedno sa predsjednikom Crne Gore Momirom Bulatovićem, objavio da je Crna Gora napadnuta tj. da je oko 30000 ustaša spremno napasti Crnu Goru .
At the same time, the head of the Trebinje Municipality Assembly, Božidar Vučurević, announced by mass media that the Trebinje municipality area had been attacked by the Croatian forces and that the former JNA had to counter-attack.
Također u to vrijeme predsjednik Skupštine općine Trebinje Božidar Vučurević putem sredstava javnog priopćavanja je izjavio da je od strane hrvatskih snaga napadnuto područje općine Trebinje i da bivša JNA mora preći u kontranapad.
The facts that all the heavy weaponry remained under the control of the former JNA units, that the Republic of Croatia was under an international embargo on the import of weapons and that the National Guard Corps was at that time armed only with light infantry weapons, prove that the allegations were common lies.
Da su to bile obične laži proizlazi iz činjenice da je sve teško naoružanje ostalo pod kontrolom jedinica bivše JNA, da je Republika Hrvatska bila pod međunarodnim embargom na uvoz oružja i da je tadašnji Zbor narodne garde bio naoružan samo lakim pješačkim oružjem.
Even though the military reports of the former JNA from 1991 state that around 30,000 armed Croatian soldiers were stationed in the Dubrovnik area and thus represented a security threat for Montenegro, it is indisputable that the allegations were lies used in an attempt to justify the attack on the Republic of Croatia, but also for propaganda purposes, in order to motivate the citizens of Montenegro and Serbia for war.
Premda se u vojnim izvješćima bivše JNA tijekom 1991. navodi kako je na Dubrovačkom području stacionirano oko 30 000 naoružanih hrvatskih vojnika koji prijete sigurnosti Crne Gore, nesporno je da su to bile laži kojima se pokušavala opravdati agresija na Republiku Hrvatsku a služile su i u propagandne svrhe da bi se na rat motiviralo stanovništvo Crne Gore i Srbije.
The intelligence services of the former JNA most definitely knew how small the number of Croatian soldiers in this area was and what their weaponry was like.
Obavještajne službe bivše JNA sa sigurnošću su znale koliki je mali broj hrvatskih vojnika na ovom području i kakvo je njihovo naoružanje.
According to the documentation of the Croatian Armed Forces, the witness testimony of the Croatian Army General Nojko Marinković, commander of the South Front, as well as the European Community observers, who had been situated in Dubrovnik and have given a testimony to the International Criminal Tribunal, the armed forces had only approximately 700 members of the National Guard Corps, armed with light infantry weapons, with a couple of mortars and small-calibre cannons, distributed over the 75 kilometres long area from the Montenegrin border to Pelješac, at the time of the attack by the former JNA on the Dubrovnik region.
Prema dokumentaciji Hrvatskih oružanih snaga, svjedočkom iskazu generala Hrvatske vojske Nojka Marinovića zapovjednika Južnog bojišta, te promatrača Europske zajednice koji su se nalazili u Dubrovniku i koji su dali iskaz pred Haškim sudom proizlazi, da su u trenutku napada bivše JNA na Dubrovačko područje Hrvatske oružane snage imale samo oko 700 pripadnika Zbora narodne garde koji su bili naoružani lakim pješačkim naoružanjem sa nekoliko minobacača i topova malog kalibra, koji su bili raspoređeni na prostoru dužine 75 kilometara od granice sa Crnom Gorom do Pelješca.
Therefore, the motive for the attack of the former JNA on the Republic of Croatia, ie. the Dubrovnik region, was neither the security threat to the Serbian population in this area, nor the attack of the Republic of Croatia on Montenegro, ie. the municipality of Trebinje, but solely the idea of Greater-Serbian nationalists to create the so-called Greater Serbia, which would also encompass the Dubrovnik region,
Stoga povod za napad na Republiku Hrvatsku odnosno Dubrovačko područje od strane bivše JNA nije bila ugroženost srpskog stanovništva na ovom područja a niti napad Republike Hrvatske na Crnu Goru odnosno općinu Trebinje, već isključivo zamisao velikosrpskih nacionalista da nakon raspada bivše Jugoslavije okupacijom dijelova Republike Hrvatske stvore tzv.
by occupying parts of the Republic of Croatia after the break-up of Yugoslavia.
Veliku Srbiju u čijem bi sastavu bilo i područje Dubrovnika.
Army Naval Sector of the ex JNA and attack parts of Dubrovnik hinterland from the direction of Trebinje towards Brgat, Dubrovnik, Mokošica and Zaton, and regardless of the fact that they witnessed, while visiting the occupied areas, that units under their command excessively and unselectively, with artillery weapons and mine throwers, shelled villages, killing civilians who should be protected from any kind of violence originating from military operations, detained them, harassed and forced them to flee, and upon entrance into populated villages destroyed civil, cultural and business objects, looted them and set on fire, thus acting against the provisions of the Article 3, paragraph 1, item 1 and paragraph 2, items a, 27, 32, 33 and 53
Vojno pomorskog sektora bivše JNA napadaju dijelove dubrovačkog zaleđa iz pravca Trebinja prema Brgatu, Dubrovniku, Mokošici i Zatonu, pa iako su obilazili napadnuta i a kasnije okupirana područja i uvjerili se da njima podređene postrojbe prekomjerno i bez izbora cilja artiljerijskim oružjem i minobacačima granatiraju naselja i ubijaju civilno stanovništvo koje je moralo biti zaštićeno od svakog nasilja koje proizlazi iz vojnih operacija zatvaraju ga, maltretiraju i natjeravaju ga u bijeg, a po ulasku u naseljena mjesta ruše civilne, kulturne i gospodarske objekte, pljačkaju ih i pale te da postupaju protivno odredbama čl.3. st.1.t.1. i st.2.t.a, 27., 32., 33. i 53.
This was the goal of the attack of the former JNA on the Dubrovnik region, which started on 1st October 1991. The war activity and occupation of this region lasted until 26th October 1992, when the former JNA units withdrew from the occupied area in consequence of attacks by the Croatian Army and the pressure of the International Community.
S takvim ciljem počela je 1. listopada 1991. agresija bivše JNA na Dubrovačko područje a ratna djelovanja i okupacija ovog područja trajala su 26. listopada 1992. kada su se jedinice bivše JNA pred napadima Hrvatske vojske i pritiskom međunarodne zajednice povukle sa okupiranog područja.
The former JNA had all locations from the Montenegrin border to Pelješac, ie. the border with Bosnia and Herzegovina, under occupation, except the city of Dubrovnik.
Od strane bivše JNA bila su okupirana sva mjesta od granice Crne Gore do Pelješca odnosno do granice sa Bosnom i Hercegoviom, osim grada Dubrovnika.
Protocol additional to the Geneva conventions of 12 August 1949 and related to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I), although they were obligated to do so, they omitted to perform actions in order to prevent such illegal behaviour and sanction the perpetrators, instead by behaving as they did, supported such behaviour, allowing units under their superior authority to continue such activities and agreed to the consequences of such actions, so the presently unknown members of units under their command in the field and during the period previously mentioned, from artillery and infantry weapons killed 65 civilians:
Dopunskog protokola Ženevskim konvencijama od 12. kolovoza 1949. o zaštiti žrtava međunarodnih oružanih sukoba (Protokol I ), premda su bili dužni nisu ništa poduzeli da se takvo nedopušteno ponašanje spriječi i počinitelji kazne, već su takvim svojim ponašanjem to podržavali, pristajući da njima podređene vojne postrojbe nastave s takvim postupanjem i pristali na njihove posljedice pa su tako za sada nepoznati pripadnici njemu podređenih postrojbi na terenu u naznačenom vremenu iz artiljerijskog i pješačkog oružja ubili 65 civilnih osoba