natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The task of the Commission is to evaluate the conformity of textbooks and auxiliary teaching materials with the ethical requirements of the Textbook Standard, and with the provisions of the Act on Elementary and High School Textbooks, which regulate that textbooks and auxiliary teaching materials must not be contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, or to the established principles of democratic society which primarily pertains to the protection of human rights and rights of minorities, fundamental liberties and rights of people and citizens, and gender equality.
Zadaća Povjerenstva je izvršiti prosudbu udžbenika i dopunskih nastavnih sredstava s etičkim zahtjevima Udžbeničkog standarda, kao i s odredbama Zakona o udžbenicima za osnovnu i srednju školu koji propisuju da udžbenici i dopunska nastavna sredstva ne smiju biti protivni Ustavu Republike Hrvatske, kao i utvrđenim načelima demokratskog društva koja se posebice odnose na zaštitu ljudskih i manjinskih prava, temeljnih sloboda i prava čovjeka i građanina te ravnopravnost spolova.
In the provisions of Art.
Ustavotvorac je temeljem odredbe čl.
of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, the framers of the Constitution laid down three preconditions whose realisation may justify the decision on curtailing individual constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms and rights.
Ustava Republike Hrvatske predvidio tri pretpostavke nakon čijeg se ostvarenja može donijeti odluka o ograničenju pojedinih sloboda i prava zajamčenih Ustavom.
The said preconditions are:
Navedene pretpostavke su:
1) a state of war, 2) any clear and present danger to the independence and unity of the state, and 3) a natural disaster.
1) ratno stanje, 2) neposredna ugroženost neovisnosti i jedinstvenosti države te 3) velike prirodne nepogode.
Although the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia does not specify which freedoms and/or rights may be curtailed, it is paramount to emphasise that such curtailment shall depend on the nature of the individual precondition whose realisation may justify the decision on restricting individual freedoms and rights, whereby the extent of such restrictions, pursuant to the provisions of Art.
Iako Ustavom Republike Hrvatske nije propisano koja se sloboda i/ili pravo može ograničiti, nužno je naglasiti kako to ovisi o samoj naravi pojedine pretpostavke za donošenje odluke o ograničenju pojedinih sloboda i prava, pri čemu opseg tog ograničenja, prema odredbi čl.
of the Constitution must be "adequate to the nature of the threat, and may not result in the inequality of citizens with respect to race, colour, gender, language, religion, national or social origin".
Ustava, mora biti „primjeren naravi pogibelji, a za posljedicu ne može imati nejednakost osoba s obzirom na rasu, boju kože, spol, jezik, vjeru, nacionalno ili socijalno podrijetlo.“.
In summation, it can be concluded that the Croatian Parliament, or the President of the Republic, must comply with the following two criteria when deciding to curtail individual freedoms and rights: first - the extent of the restrictions must be adequate to the nature of the threat (therefore, what is being applied here is the same proportionality principle used in Article 4
Iz navedenog proizlazi da se Hrvatski sabor, odnosno predsjednik Republike, pri donošenju odluke o ograničenju pojedinih sloboda i prava mora pridržavati sljedećih dvaju kriterija: prvo, opseg ograničenja uvijek mora biti primjeren naravi pogibelji (riječ je, dakle, o primjeni načela proporcionalnosti koje je sadržano i u članku 4.
of the Covenant with the wording "to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation"); second - the consequence (scope) of the restrictions may not result in the inequality of persons with respect to race, colour, gender, language, religion, national or social origin, which adheres in full to the wording in Article 4
Pakta, kroz formulaciju „u opsegu koji je strogo određen tim izvanrednim prilikama“); drugo, posljedica (opseg) ograničenja ne smije biti nejednakost osoba s obzirom na rasu, boju kože, spol, jezik, vjeru, nacionalno ili socijalno podrijetlo, što u cijelosti odgovara formulaciji u članku 4.
of the Covenant ("do not involve discrimination solely on the ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion or social origin").
Pakta („da ne povlače za sobom diskriminaciju temeljenu na rasi, boji kože, spolu, jeziku, vjeri ili socijalnom podrijetlu“).
Furthermore, the inalienable nature of individual rights, even in a time of public emergency, is highlighted by the provisions of Art.
Nadalje, neupitnost pojedinih prava i u stanju nužde istaknuta je odredbom čl.
of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia which states:
Ustava Republike Hrvatske kojim je propisano da:
Upholding the ban on restricting the aforementioned rights includes, of course, the inviolable constitutional prohibition of abolishing those rights.
Poštivanje zabrane ograničavanja navedenih prava uključuje, dakako, i nepovredivu ustavnu zabranu ukidanja tih prava.
Although the aforementioned rights and freedoms do not explicitly state, for example, the right laid down in Article 8, Paragraph 2
Iako među navedenim pravima i slobodama nije izrijekom navedeno, primjerice, pravo iz članka 8. stavka 2.
of the Covenant ("No one shall be held in servitude."), the requirement for this right to be observed is implied in a series of constitutional provisions, such as the provisions of Art.
Pakta („Nitko se ne smije držati u odnosu sličnom ropstvu.“), zahtjev za njegovim poštivanjem proizlazi iz niza ustavnih odredbi, poput odredbi čl.
of the Constitution ("All persons shall be equal before the law."), Art.
Ustava („Svi su pred zakonom jednaki.“), čl.
("Human liberty and personality shall be inviolable."), Art.
(„Čovjekova je sloboda i osobnost nepovrediva.“), čl.
("Forced and compulsory labour shall be forbidden."), and especially in the general constitutional principles laid down in Article 3
(„Zabranjen je prisilni i obvezatni rad.“), a napose iz općih ustavnih načela koja su sadržana u članku 3.
of the Constitution and defined as the "highest values of the constitutional order of the Republic of Croatia" which serve - and this should also be highlighted in other legislative examples - as the "basis for the interpretation of the Constitution".
Ustava i određena kao „najviše vrednote ustavnog poretka Republike Hrvatske“ te koja služe - što posebno valja podcrtati i u drugim pravnim primjerima - kao „temelj za tumačenje Ustava“.
Finally, it should be remarked that the provision of Art.
Naposljetku, potrebno je napomenuti kako odredba čl.
of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, pursuant to which the President of the Republic "may issue decrees with the force of law", does not offer the constitutional possibility of de facto derogation of Covenant rights by circumventing the restrictions of the provisions of Art.
Ustava Republike Hrvatske, prema kojoj predsjednik Republike „može donositi uredbe sa zakonskom snagom“, ne otvara ustavnu mogućnost de facto derogacije prava iz Pakta zaobilaženjem ograničenja iz odredbe čl.
of the Constitution, which is evident from the provisions of Art.
Ustava, što je razvidno iz odredbe čl.
of the Constitution, pursuant to which:
Ustava, prema kojem:
"In the Republic of Croatia, laws shall comply with the Constitution. Other regulations shall comply with the Constitution and law.". Since the legislative force of the decrees with the force of law is weaker than that of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, pursuant to the provisions of Art.
„U Republici Hrvatskoj zakoni moraju biti u suglasnosti s Ustavom, a ostali propisi i s Ustavom i sa zakonom.“ Kako su uredbe sa zakonskom snagom po svojoj pravnoj snazi ispod Ustava Republike Hrvatske, u skladu s odredbom čl.
of the Constitution, all decrees with the force of law must comply with the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia and no constitutional provisions can be derogated by them, including the provisions of Art.
Ustava, sve uredbe sa zakonskom snagom moraju biti u skladu s Ustavom Republike Hrvatske i njima se ne može derogirati nijedna ustavna odredba, pa tako ni one iz odredbe čl.
of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia.
Ustava Republike Hrvatske.
In view of the aforementioned, the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia are fully compliant with the provisions of Article 4 of the
Slijedom svega navedenog, odredbe Ustava Republike Hrvatske u cijelosti su u skladu s odredbama članka 4.
Covenant regarding the actions taken in a time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation.
Pakta u pogledu postupanja u vrijeme izvanrednog stanja u kojemu je ugrožen opstanak naroda.
A working meeting of the Chief State Attorney, municipal and county state attorneys, officials of the General Police Directorate, and commissioners of police administrations of the Republic of Croatia was held in mid-December 2012, with the aim of undertaking activities in the field of investigating and prosecuting war crimes committed during and after "Operation Storm".
U cilju poduzimanja aktivnosti u području istraživanja i procesuiranja ratnih zločina počinjenih tijekom i nakon Operacije „Oluja“, sredinom prosinca 2012. godine održan je radni sastanak Glavnog državnog odvjetnika, općinskih i županijskih državnih odvjetnika te čelnika ravnateljstva policije i načelnika policijskih uprava Republike Hrvatske.
At the meeting it was highlighted that it is of particular importance that in the following months activities be focused in the field of war crimes, specifically towards the discovery and prosecution of the perpetrators of war crimes who were set as national and regional priorities, and of crimes committed during the military and police operation "Storm" and immediately after its conclusion.
Na sastanku je naglašeno kako je posebno važno u tijeku idućih mjeseci usmjeriti rad na području ratnih zločina na otkrivanje i progon počinitelja ratnih zločina, određenih kao nacionalni i regionalni prioriteti, te zločina počinjenih za vrijeme Vojnoredarstvene akcija „Oluja“ i neposredno nakon njezina dovršetka.
In regard to war crimes committed during and after "Operation Storm", the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia requested from the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (hereinafter:
U vezi s ratnim zločinima počinjenima tijekom i nakon „Oluje“, Državno odvjetništvo Republike Hrvatske zatražilo je od Ureda tužiteljstva Međunarodnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju (dalje:
ICTY) in The Hague that they deliver all the materials contained in the files from the proceedings the said Office instituted against Ante Gotovina, Mladen Markač and Ivan Čermak, in order for the said materials to be used in further actions of the state attorneys involving war crimes, on the prosecution of which competent county state attorneys' offices are already working.
MKSJ) u Den Haag-u dostavu cjelokupnih materijala spisa iz postupka tog Ureda protiv Ante Gotovine, Mladena Markača i Ivana Čermaka, a za potrebe daljnjeg državnoodvjetničkog postupanja u predmetima zbog kaznenih djela ratnih zločina na kojima već postupaju nadležna županijska državna odvjetništva.
Most of the documentation from the aforementioned proceedings was unavailable until recently, since the final verdicts in the ICTY proceedings were not yet reached.
Dokumentaciju iz tog predmeta u najvećem dijelu nije bilo moguće ranije dobiti budući da postupak pred MKSJ nije bio pravomoćno završen.
The trial of the case "Grubori" against two members of the special police troops is currently being heard. In the case "Crimes in Prokljan and Mandići" the verdicts against four members of the Croatian Army were returned; one defendant was convicted with a non-final verdict, and three defendants were acquitted with non-final verdicts.
U tijeku je postupak suđenja u predmetu „Grubori“ protiv dvojice pripadnika specijalne postrojbe Policije, dok su u predmetu „Zločin u Prokljanu i Mandićima“ protiv četvorice pripadnika Hrvatske vojske donesene nepravomoćna osuđujuća presuda za jednog osumnjičenika te nepravomoćna oslobađajuća presuda za trojicu osumnjičenika.
The new, revised list of national priorities contains two cases related to war crimes committed by the members of the Croatian Army and police during and after the military and police operation "Storm".
U novoj revidiranoj listi nacionalnih prioriteta dva su predmeta povezana s ratnim zločinima počinjenim od strane pripadnika hrvatske vojske i policije tijekom i nakon vojno-redarstvene operacije „Oluja“.
A table overview with aggregated statistical data on war crime cases as of 5 June 2013 can be found in Annex II.
Tabelarni prikaz sa zbirnim statističkim podacima o predmetima ratnih zločina sa stanjem na dan 5. lipnja 2013. godine nalazi se u Prilogu II.
With the aim of implementing the Instruction number O-4/08 related to the handling of war crime cases and supporting the implementation of the Ministry of Justice Strategy for the Investigation and Prosecution of War Crimes Committed in the Period 1991-1995, the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia drew up an Operational Programme which lays down in detail all the immediate obligations of all state attorneys, especially obligations of coordinating their activities with police officers, as well as deadlines and control and evaluation methods for the progress achieved.
U svrhu provedbe Naputka broj O-4/08 u vezi rada na predmetima ratnih zločina i podrške u provođenju Strategije Ministarstva pravosuđa u vezi obveza pojedinih tijela u istraživanju i procesuiranju ratnih zločina počinjenih u razdoblju od 1991. do 1995., u Državnom odvjetništvu Republike Hrvatske sačinjen je Operativni program kojim su detaljno propisane neposredne obveze svih državnih odvjetnika, posebno obveze u koordinaciji rada s djelatnicima policije, a također su određeni rokovi i načini kontrole i vrednovanja ostvarenih napredaka.
The following was achieved in relation to the implementation of the Strategy of the Ministry of Justice and the implementation of the Operational Programme:
U svezi provedbe Strategije Ministarstva pravosuđa i provedbe Operativnog programa učinjeno je sljedeće:
The Amendments to the Act on the Implementation of the Statute of the International Criminal Court and Prosecution of Crimes against International Law of War and Humanitarian Law define that, in cases provided by law, the four largest County Courts of the Republic of Croatia (Osijek, Rijeka, Split, and Zagreb) have jurisdiction, and consequently so do the four largest County State Attorneys Offices in those seats, where special War Crime Departments were established.
Izmjenama Zakona o primjeni Statuta međunarodnog kaznenog suda i progonu za kaznena djela protiv međunarodnog ratnog i humanitarnog prava određeno je da su, u zakonom određenim slučajevima, nadležna četiri najveća Županijska suda u Republici Hrvatskoj (Osijek, Rijeka, Split i Zagreb), a time i četiri najveća Županijska državna odvjetništva u njihovim sjedištima, u kojima su osnovani posebni Odsjeci za ratne zločine.
The four largest police administrations were deemed as specialised for actions in war crime cases.
Četiri najveće policijske uprave određene su kao specijalizirane za postupanje u ratnim zločinima.
Based on the amendments to the Act, the activities of certain bodies were reorganised in 2011 by creating a "vertical" management system for efficient work on those cases.
Na osnovu izmjena zakona tijekom 2011. godine došlo je do reorganizacije rada u pojedinim tijelima na način da je stvorena „vertikala“ za učinkovit rad na tim predmetima.
In July 2010, eight crimes in which the perpetrators were never discovered were prioritised on national level.
U srpnju 2010. godine na nacionalnoj razini određeno je osam zločina u kojima počinitelji nisu bili otkriveni.
By mid 2012, the perpetrators were discovered and prosecuted for six of the eight crimes.
Do polovice 2012. godine počinitelji su otkriveni i procesuirani u šest od osam zločina.
Amendments to laws, specialisation, and creating "vertical" management systems in the police, state attorneys offices, and courts have contributed to the discovery and prosecution of war crimes.
Izmjene zakona, specijalizacija i stvaranje „vertikala“ u policiji, državnom odvjetništvu i na sudovima, doprinijeli su otkrivanju i procesuiranju ratnih zločina.
The progress achieved and the evaluation that it is necessary to take additional measures and actions in order to discover and prosecute perpetrators, or the persons who have issued the orders for the most serious crimes in which the perpetrators have not yet been discovered, required further measures and actions to be taken.
Postignut napredak s jedne strane i ocjena kako je nužno poduzeti dodatne mjere i radnje kako bi se otkrili i procesuirali počinitelji, odnosno naredbodavci u najtežim zločinima u kojima počinitelji do sada nisu otkriveni, tražilo je poduzimanje daljnjih mjera i radnji.
In September 2012, upon reviewing what was achieved thus far, it was decided that the following actions needed to be taken:
U rujnu 2012. godine, a nakon razmatranja dotad postignutog, odlučeno je kako je potrebno poduzeti sljedeće:
Revision of priorities - given that the best results are achieved at national level, due to the quality of investigators and their experience, as well as due to the level of supervision, the decision was reached to set new national priorities and revise regional priorities in order to concentrate activities and increase discovery success.
Revizija prioriteta - imajući u vidu da se upravo na nacionalnoj razini postižu najbolji rezultati, kako zbog kvalitete istražitelja i iskustva, tako i zbog razine nadzora, donesena je odluka o određivanju novih nacionalnih prioriteta te reviziji regionalnih prioriteta radi koncentracije rada i povećanja uspješnosti u otkrivanju.
Once the regional priorities were revised, all cases were evaluated at national level.
Nakon revidiranja regionalnih prioriteta, svi predmeti razmotreni su na nacionalnoj razini.
On the basis of the evaluation, the basic criteria of which was the seriousness of a crime and the method by which it was executed, new national priorities were set for two crimes related to war crimes during or immediately following the military and police operation "Storm".
Na osnovu razmatranja, pri čemu je osnovni kriterij bila težina zločina i način izvršenja, određeni su novi nacionalni prioriteti od čega se dva zločina odnose na ratne zločine u vezi VRA Oluja.
Operative methods - in order to retain operative efficiency regarding national level priorities and increase operative efficiency regarding regional level cases, operative and reporting methods were set.
Način rada - Kako bi se zadržala učinkovitost u radu na prioritetima na nacionalnoj razini i povećala učinkovitost u radu na predmetima na regionalnoj razini, dogovoreni su načini rada i izvješćivanja.
The current progress achieved with the discovery of perpetrators in six of eight national level crimes, and in eleven regional level cases, gives us grounds to conclude that what we have planned is attainable.
Dosadašnji napredak postignut kroz otkrivanje počinitelja u šest od osam zločina na nacionalnoj razini te u jedanaest predmeta na regionalnoj razini daje osnova za zaključak o ostvarivosti planiranog.
In addition to working on cases in which the perpetrators were never discovered, the Action Plan requires that state attorneys offices continuously audit proceedings which were initiated with too broad a scope in the early 1990s.
Osim rada na predmetima u kojima počinitelji nisu otkriveni, u državnim odvjetništvima Akcijskim planom kontinuirano se vrše revizije postupaka preširoko pokrenutih tijekom ranih 90-tih godina.
In relation to ensuring a uniform application of prosecuting standards for war crime trials and eliminating the disparities in charges and court rulings for similar cases, we emphasise that the state attorneys offices apply equal standards to all defendants regardless of their membership in armed forces.
Vezano za osiguranje jedinstvene primjene tužiteljskih standarda u suđenjima ratnih zločina i otklanjanje razlika u optuženjima i sudskim odlukama u sličnim predmetima, ističe se da državno odvjetništvo primjenjuje jednake standarde u odnosu na okrivljenike bez obzira na pripadnost oružanim snagama.
In the period from when the Strategy was adopted until today, proceedings were discontinued against 57 perpetrators, either during the preliminary investigation proceedings or after indictment.
Tako je u razdoblju od donošenja Strategije pa do danas, što tijekom istražnog postupka, što nakon podizanja optužnice, postupak obustavljen u odnosu na 57 počinitelja.
Moreover, since the Criminal Procedure Act was amended to allow in absentia renewal of proceedings in which a final verdict was reached, requests for renewal were filed for 127 defendants.
Također, od promjene Zakona o kaznenom postupku kojim se dozvoljava obnova pravomoćno završenog postupka i bez prisutnosti okrivljenika, ukupno je podneseno zahtjeva za obnovu u odnosu na 127 okrivljenika.
Of the aforementioned number, competent state attorneys offices requested renewals of proceedings for 95 defendants, 30 convicted persons filed the requests by themselves, 12 of which were filed in absentia.
Od toga su nadležna državna odvjetništva zatražila obnove u odnosu na 95 okrivljenika, 30 osuđenika su sami stavili zahtjeve, od čega 12 u odsutnosti.
In the vast majority of cases, the proceedings were discontinued.
U najvećem broju slučajeva postupci su obustavljeni.
The Republic of Croatia continuously cooperates with prosecutors' offices in accordance with agreements stipulated between prosecutors' offices.
Republika Hrvatska svakodnevno surađuje s tužiteljskim uredima i to na temelju sporazuma između tužiteljskih ureda.
In addition to individual actions of assisting in specific cases, data and evidence were submitted to the prosecutors' offices in the region for certain cases in which it had been established that the perpetrators reside in state territories in which the respective prosecutors' offices have jurisdiction and are nationals of those states.
Pored pojedinačnih radnji pružanja pomoći u konkretnim predmetima, tužiteljskim uredima u regiji predani su i podaci i dokazi u određenim predmetima u kojima je utvrđeno kako počinitelji prebivaju na teritorijima njihovih država te imaju državljanstva tih država.
On 3 June 2013, the Protocol on the Cooperation between the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia and the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the prosecution of perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, was signed in Sarajevo.
Dana 3. lipnja 2013. godine u Sarajevu je potpisan Protokol između Državnog odvjetništva Republike Hrvatske i Tužiteljstva Bosne i Hercegovine o suradnji u progonu počinitelja kaznenih djela ratnih zločina, zločina protiv čovječnosti i genocida.
In relation to the 2011 Act on the Invalidation of Certain Legal Acts of the Judicial Bodies of the Former Yugoslav National Army, the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Serbia, the President of the Republic of Croatia filed a request for the evaluation of the constitutionality of the aforementioned Act to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia in late December 2012.
U odnosu na Zakon o ništetnosti određenih pravnih akata pravosudnih tijela bivše JNA, bivše SFRJ i Republike Srbije iz 2011. godine, predsjednik Republike Hrvatske je krajem prosinca 2012. godine podnio Ustavnom sudu Republike Hrvatske zahtjev za ocjenom ustavnosti zakona.
The Government of the Republic of Croatia proposed that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia reaches a decision which would establish that the aforementioned Act was unconstitutional, and that the Act be repealed in full.
Vlada Republike Hrvatske Ustavnome sudu Republike Hrvatske predložila je da donese odluku kojom se utvrđuje neustavnost navedenog Zakona te da se Zakon ukine u cjelini.