natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Small oily fish biomass fluctuations are generally expected, since the species in question have short lifespans and relatively high natural mortality coefficients, and their recruitment is extremely dependant on environmental factors.
Općenito, fluktuacije u biomasi sitne plave ribe su očekivane s obzirom da se radi o kratko živućim vrstama s relativno visokim koeficijentom prirodne smrtnosti te čije novačenje izrazito ovisi o ekološkim faktorima okoline.
-2011) the annual median values of anchovy total body length ranged from 12.0 cm (12.39 2.76 cm; 2008) to 13.5 cm (13.83 0.54 cm; 2011)
- 2011. god.) godišnje srednje vrijednosti totalnih dužina tijela inćuna su kolebale u rasponu od 12,0 cm (12,39 2,76 cm; 2008.) do 13,5 cm (13,83 0,54 cm; 2011.)
-2011) in the sea fishing territory of the Republic of Croatia.
- 2011. god.) u ribolovnom moru RH.
-2010 period, indicates the presence of smaller units (recruits) in the 2009 and 2010 catches, and 1 or 2-year-old anchovies were prevalent in the catches (Figure 18).
- 2010. godine, ukazuje na prisustvo manjih jedinki (novaka) u lovinama tijekom 2009. i 2010. godine, te kao najučestaliji ulov inćun starosti 1 odnosno 2 godine (Slika 18.).
The age structure of the anchovy population in commercial catches landed in the sea fishing territory of the Republic of Croatia, during the 2008-2010 period.
Starosna struktura populacije inćuna u komercijalnim lovinama ostvarenim u ribolovnom moru RH, tijekom razdoblja 2008.- 2010. godina.
The evaluation models for Adriatic Sea small oily fish include: direct echo sounding method, statistical fishing data, collecting biological parameters of the population, as well as including the aforementioned data into the indirect method - Virtual Population Analyses (VPA).
Modeli procjene sitne plave ribe u Jadranskom moru uključuju direktnu metodu ehosondiranjem, statističke podatke o ulovu kao i sakupljanje bioloških parametra populacije, te uključivanje navedenih podatka u indirektnu metodu - Virtual Population Analyses (VPA).
Prohibiting fishing for small oily fish (on the entire fishing territory of the Republic of Croatia, or limiting the prohibition to spawning and maturation areas) for one month during the cold seasons of the year, which would protect the sardine during its most intense spawning period, as well as juvenile specimens of anchovy; and a one month moratorium on fishing during the warm seasons of the year, which would protect the anchovy during its most intense spawning period, as well as juvenile specimens of the sardine.
Zabrane ribolova male plave ribe (na cijelom ribolovnom području RH ili ograničeno - na područjima mriješćenja i rasta) u trajanju od mjesec dana u hladnijem dijelu godine, čime se zaštićuje srdela tijekom razdoblja najintenzivnijeg mriješćenja kao i juveniline jedinke inćuna, te zabranom u trajanju od mjesec dana ribolova tijekom toplijeg dijela godine čime se štiti inćun tijekom razdoblja najintenzivnijeg mriješćenja, ali i juveniline jedinke srdele.
Although the current regulations (Ordinance on fishing gears and commercial sea fishing equipment, The Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia 148/10; amended OG 25/11) prohibit small oily fish purse seine net fishing from December 15 to January 15, the dates for the period cannot be set in advance, but should depend on the biological behaviour of the species (start of spawning) in each individual year.
Premda je sadašnjom regulacijom (Pravilnik o ribolovnim alatima i opremi za gospodarski ribolov na moru NN148/10; dopuna NN25/11) ribolov okružujućim mrežama plivaricama za ulov sitne plave ribe zabranjen od 15. prosinca do 15. siječnja, to razdoblje ne može biti datumski unaprijed utvrđeno nego treba ovisiti o biološkom ponašanju vrste (početku mriješćenja) u svakoj pojedinoj godini.
Seining is implemented throughout the fishing sea of the Republic of Croatia, which is bathymetrically varied - from the shallow shelf of the north Adriatic to the deep slopes of central and south Adriatic.
Plivaričarski ribolov se obavlja u cijelom ribolovnom moru RH, koji se razlikuje po batimetriji: od plitkog šelfa u sjevernom Jadranu pa sve do dubokih dijelova srednjeg i južnog Jadrana.
Average length of trawlers in the Republic of Croatia is 14.39 meters.
Srednja dužina koćara u RH iznosi 14.39 metara.
Average engine power of trawlers in Croatia is 142.82 kW.
Srednja snaga motora hrvatskih koćara u RH iznosi 142.82 kW.
Average engine power in the Istria county is 138.51 kW.
Srednja snaga motora u Istarskoj županiji iznosi 138.51 kW.
A similar situation exists in other fishing zones of channel areas E and F: Vessels under than 15 m of LoA do not have the technical prerequisites for leaving the coastal area.
Slična je situacija i u ostalim ribolovnim zonama kanalskih područja E i F: plovila manja od 15 m LoA nemaju trehničkih mogućnosti napustiti priobalno područje.
Zagreb, 9 February, 2009
Zagreb, 29. rujna 2009.
the Act on the State Commission for Supervision of Public Procurement Procedure (Official Gazette no. 117/03) issues the following
Zakona o Državnoj komisiji za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave (Narodne novine broj 117/03) donosi slijedeće
Open public procurement procedure no.
Poništava se otvoreni postupak javne nabave broj:
N-02-V-120510-150409, published in the Electronic Public Procurement Classifieds on 14 April 2009, by the Client the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development,
N-02-V-120510-150409, objavljen u Elektroničkom oglasniku javne nabave 16. travnja 2009., naručitelja Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja.
Zagreb, for the procurement and installation of a device for the fishing vessel monitoring system via satellite (VMS), is thus annulled.
Zagreb, za nabavu i instalacije uređaja za satelitski sustav nadzora ribarskih plovila (VMS).
The Client the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, Zagreb, is obligated to reimburse the costs of initiating an appeal procedure to the appellant the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, within 8 days in the amount of HRK 7,570.00.
Dužan je naručitelj Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja, Zagreb, u roku od 8 dana nadoknaditi troškove pokretanja žalbenog postupka žalitelj u Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb, u iznosu od 7.570,00 kuna.
Explanation
Obrazloženje
Pick & Place d.o.o., Portorož, the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing (hereinafter FER),
Pick & Place d.o.o., Portorož, Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva (dalje II tekstu:
Zagreb, Telefon d.o.o., Knin and Ema d.o.o., Celje, and the Client decided only the offer by the Pick & Place d.o.o., Portorož, was unacceptable.
FER), Zagreb, Telefon d.o.o., Knin i Ema d.o.o., Celje, a miručitelj je samo ponudu Pick & Place d.o.o., Portorož, ocijenio neprihvatljivom.
In the appeal, the appellant FER, Zagreb, requests their costs of initiating an appeal be reimbursed by the Client in the total amount of HRK 7,570.00.
Žalitelj FER, Zagreb, u svojoj žalbi zahtijeva da mu naručitelj nadoknadi troškove pokretanja žalbenog postupka u ukupnom iznosu od 7.570,00 kuna.
Propositions to order temporary injunction by the appellant the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, and the appellant Telefon d.o.o., Knin, are dismissed as groundless.
Prijedlozi za određivanje privremene mjere žalitelj a Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb i žalitelja Telefon d.o.o., Knin, odbijaju se kao neosnovani.
Both appellants proposed ordering a temporary security injunction in their appeals.
Oba žalitelja su u svojim žalbama postavila prijedloge za određivanjem privremene mjere osiguranja.
Propositions by the appellants for ordering temporary injunction are found ungrounded.
Prijedlozi žalitelja za određivanje privremene mjere su neosnovani.
Subject of the proposition can be a prohibition of entering into the procurement contract and of the performance of the obligations under the procurement procedure, but also any other injunction the purpose of which would be to prevent damages which can arise unless the proposed injunction is adopted.
Predmet prijedloga može biti zabrana potpisivanja ugovora o javnoj nabavi i izvršavanja ugovornih obveza koje su predmet nabave predmetnog postupka ali i koja druga mjera kojoj bi cilj bio sprječavanje nastanka štete do koje bi moglo doći ako se ne usvoji predložena mjera.
In proposing the ordering of temporary injunction, the appellant must prove probable the circumstances upon which the proposition is based.
U prijedlogu za određivanje privremene mjere žalitelj mora učiniti vjerojatnim postojanje okolnosti na kojima temelji svoj zahtjev.
After the review, analysis and the evaluation of the above mentioned evidence, the facts, mentioned in the Decision, were determined and positive regulations were applied to them.
Nakon pregleda, analize i ocjene gore navedenog dokaznog materijala utvrđene su, u rješenju navedene, činjenice, na koje su primijenjeni pozitivni propisi.
of the Public Procurement Act (hereinafter: the Act),
Zakona o javnoj nabavi (dalje u tekstu:
for the purpose of determining significant violations pertaining to Article 140
Zakon), a radi utvrđenja bitnih povreda iz članka 140.
of the Act, this body determined the following.
Zakona ovo je tijelo utvrdilo slijedeće.
After reviewing the entire tendering documentation of the procedure in question, it was determined that the Client failed to request a permission of the Croatian Post and Electronic Communications Agency (hereinafter:
Pregledom cjelokupne dokumentacije za nadmetanje predmetnog postupka utvrđeno je da naručitelj istom nije tražio odobrenje Hrvatske agencije za poštu i elektroničke komunikacije (dalje u tekstu:
of the Ordinance, which meets all important demands set forth in Article 4
Pravilnika, koja udovoljava bitnim zahtjevima iz članka 4.
of the Ordinance must first obtain an approval from HAKOM.
Pravilnika mora prethodno pribaviti odobrenje HAKOM~a.
In a letter CLASS:
HAKOM je dopisom KLASE:
please contact the Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure."
Molimo vas da se obratite Ministarstvu mora, prometa i infrastrukture."
For official interpretation of the provisions in the Ordinance,
Za službeno tumačenje odredbi Pravilnika.
Following the above mentioned, this body requested a reply from the Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure. In a letter CLASS:
Slijedom navedenog, ovo je tijelo zatražilo očitovanje Ministarstva mora prometa i infrastrukture koje je dopisom KLASE:
of the Ordinance, a legal entity or a natural person must first obtain the approval of the Croatian Post and Electronic Communications Agency."
Pravilnika, pravna ili fizička osoba mora prethodno pribaviti odobrenje Hrvatske agencije za poštu i elektroničke komunikacije."
Following the above mentioned, in compliance with Article 9
Slijedom navedenog, u skladu s člankom 9.
Therefore, based on all of the above, it can be concluded that the Client failed to request necessary approval in the tendering documentation, upon which the Client would be able to determine whether the bidders are even authorised to provide the procurement subject.
Dakle, iz svega navedenoga proizlazi da naručitelj nije dokumentacijom za nadmetanje tražio potrebno odobrenje temeljem kojega bi utvrdio jesu li pojedini ponuditelji uopće ovlašteni nuditi predmet nabave.
of the Public Procurement Act.
Zakona o javnoj nabavi.
In their appeal, the appellant Telefon d.o.o., Knin, also requested their costs of initiating an appeal be reimbursed.
Žalitelj Telefon d.o.o., Knin, je također u svojoj žalbi postavio zahtjev za naknadom troškova postupka.
INSTRUCTIONS ON LEGAL REMEDY:
POUKA O PRAVNOM LIJEKU
Telefon d.o.o., Knin, business unit Zagreb, Orlanska 1
Telefon d.o.o., Knin, poslovna jedinica Zagreb, Orlanska 1
The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Unska 3
Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb, Unska 3
The Ministry of the Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship, Directorate for Public Procurement System, Zagreb, Ul.
Ministarstvo gospodarstva, rada i poduzetništva, Uprava za sustav javne nabave, Zagreb, Ul.
Archive, here
Pismohrana, ovdje
The Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, Zagreb, Ulica grada Vukovara 78
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja, Zagreb, Ulica grada Vukovara 78
Therefore, by submitting an appeal to this body ex lege, the open public procurement procedure shall be stopped until a final decision is reached with regards to the Client's decision, that is, in this specific case there was no need to order the prohibition requested by the appellant.
Dakle, ulaganjem žalbe ovome tijelu ex lege se otvoreni postupak: javne nabave zaustavlja dok se ne donese konačna odluka u pogledu naručitelj eve odluke, odnosno u konkretnom predmetu nije bilo potrebe za određivanjem zabrane kojuje žalitelj tražio.
Four bids were submitted in response to the procedure in question:
Na predmetni postupak pristigle su četiri ponude i to:
State Commission for the Supervision of the Public Procurement Procedure, acting on account of the appeal by the appellant Telefon d.o.o.,
Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave, postupajući povodom žalbe žalitelja Telefon d.o.o.
of the Act on the State Commission for Supervision of Public Procurement Procedure (Official Gazette, no. 21/10) and Article 134 and 151
Zakona o Državnoj komisiji za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave (Narodne Novine, broj 21/10) i članka 134. i 151.
of the Public Procurement Act (Official Gazette, no. 110/07 and 125/08), issues the following
Zakona o javnoj nabavi (Narodne Novine, broj 110/07 i 125108). donosi slijedeće
Decision on the selection as of 31 August 2010, by the Client the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, Zagreb, in an open public procurement procedure no. N-02-V-106332-190210, the procurement and installation of a device for the fishing vessel monitoring system, is thus annulled.
Poništava se Odluka o odabiru od 3 I. kolovoza 2010., naručitelja Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja iz Zagreba, u otvorenom postupku javne nabave broj N-02-V-l 06332-19021 0, nabava i instalacija uređaja za sustav nadzora ribarskih plovila.
The Client the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, Zagreb, announced the open public procurement procedure no. N-02-V-106332-190210, the procurement and installation of a device for the fishing vessel monitoring system.
Naručitelj Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja iz Zagreba, objavio je otvoreni postupak javne nabave broj N-02-V -106332-190210, nabava i instalacija uređaja za sustav nadzora ribarskih plovila.
Three bidders submitted their bids in response to the tender in question.
Na predmetno nadmetanje ponude su dostavila tri ponuditelja.
Celje, Slovenia.
Celje, Slovenija.
Zagreb, this body issued a Decision Class:
Zagreb ovo tijelo donijelo je rješenje Klasa:
On account of the appeal by the appellant Končar-elektrotehnika i informatika d.d.
Povodom žalbe žalitelja Končar-elektrotehnika i informatika d.d.
Only the Client was able to successfully test the device, since only the Client had the necessary parameters, codes, keys and specifically developed software because the tendering documentation did not anticipate the delivery of such information to bidders.
Naime, testiranje uređaja uspješno je mogao izvršiti samo naručitelj budući raspolaže parametrima, šiframa, kodovima i individualno izrađenim softverom jer dokumentacija za nadmetanje nije mtI predviđala dostavu takvih podataka ponuditeljima.
Furthermore, the appellant states it was only on 19 April 2010 that they received a letter from the Client, explicitly informing them that they are expected to perform the testing on the Client's testing server, and are expected to do it on the following day, but failed to deliver necessary parameters for sending and display of calls on the Client's server, and failed to give them minimal time required for the software adjustment, stressing out the confidentiality of the matter.
Nastavno, navodi kako ga je naručitelj tek dopisom od 19. travnja 20 10. izričito obavijestio da se od njega očekuje da provede testiranje na testnom serveru naručitelja i to već idućeg dana, ali i dalje ne dostavljajući potrebne parametre za slanje i prikaz poziva na server naručitelja niti dobiva minimalno vrijeme potrebno za prilagodbu softvera uz napomenu da se radi o poslovnoj tajni.
The appellant states it was only on 28 April that they received most of the parameters form the Client's system maintenance supplier, company Gisdata d.o.o., and that they managed to connect and send all data to the Client's server on 30 April at 8:44 a.m., and as a proof of it delivers a server print out.
Navodi kako tek dana 28. travnja dobiva od održavatelja sustava naručitelja, trgovačkog društva Gisdata d.o.o. većinu parametara te se uspijeva obaviti spajanje i slanje podataka na server naručitelja s danom 30. travnja u 8,42 sata, o čemu kao dokaz dostavlja i ispis sa servera.
However, the testing deadline was 30 April at 10:00 a.m., and from a letter of an authorised person from FER, received on 14 May, and an enclosed print out, it is evident that the appellant attempted to connect to the server again on the same day at 10:35 a.m., but the Client was informed about it only after 11:00 a.m., at the time the review and evaluation of bids was under progress.
Međutim, rok za testiranje bio je 30. travnja u 10,00 sati, a iz dopisa ovlaštene osobe FER-a od 14. svibnja i priloženog ispisa, vidljivo je da je žalitelj ponovno izvršio spajanje istog dana u 10,35 sati, ali je naručitelju obavijest o tome poslana tek iza 11,00 sati, tijekom trajanja pregleda i ocjena ponuda.
The appellant claims the Client, during the second evaluation and review of bids, completely disregarded the fact that the appellant managed to perform the signal transmission and proved the device functionality and was formally informed of it in a letter from FER received on 14 May 2010.
Žalitelj navodi kako je naručitelj prilikom ponovnog pregleda i ocjene ponuda u cijelosti zanemario činjenicu da je žalitelj uspio ostvariti slanje signala i dokazao je funkcionalnost uređaja, a o čemu je formalno i obaviješten dopisom od strane FER-a od 14. svibnja 20 l O.
The appellant requests the annulment of the decision and of the procedure in the part relating to the evaluation and review of the bids.
Traži poništenje odluke i postupka u dijelu koji se odnosi na pregled i ocjenu ponuda.
The appellant requests the costs of procedure in the total amount of HRK 51,213.35, of that HRK 35,539.31 for the appeal, HRK 8,174.04 of VAT, and HRK 7,500.00 of reimbursement for the procedure and administrative taxes.
Traži troškove postupka u ukupnom iznosu od 51.213,35 kuna i to 35.539,3 l kunu za sastav žalbe, 8.174,04 kn PDV-a, 7.500,00 kn naknade postupka te upravnu pristojbu.
Furthermore, in the open deadline for bids delivery the appellant failed to deliver the mentioned complaint and request additional explanation.
Nastavno, u otvorenom roku za dostavu ponuda žalitelj je propustio dostaviti navedenu primjedbu ili tražiti dodatna pojašnjenja.
Furthermore, the Client did not respond to the invitation and came to FMC to demonstrate the signal transmission from their assembled testing device to the Client's server, although they were invited.
Također navodi kako se naručitelj nije odazvao pozivu i došao u FMC demonstrirati slanje signala sa svog montiranog testnog uređaja na server naručitelja, iako je bio uredno pozvan.
Resulting report delivered by the FER undoubtedly confirmed that the appellant's testing device failed to transmit a signal to the Client's testing server.
Izrađeni elaborat dostavljen od strane FER-a nedvojbeno je potvrdio da testni uređaj žalitelja ne šalje signal na testni server naručitelja.
The appeal is accepted as grounded.
Žalba je osnovana.
By the Decision of this body Class:
Rješenjem ovog tijela Klasa:
of the Public Procurement Act, related to failures in the segment of evaluation and review of bids, that is, non-existence of valid reasons and evidence based on which the decision was made.
Zakona o javnoj nabavi, u vezi sa propustima vezanim za postupak pregleda, ocjene i odabira ponuda odnosno nepostojanja valjanih razloga i dokaza na temelju kojih je donesena odluka.
of the Public Procurement Act, prescribes that in the legal protection process the State Commission is authorised to annul the decision, procedure or action in the part which is found to be illegal.
Zakona o javnoj nabavi propisano je da u postupku pravne zaštite Državna komisija može poništiti odluku, postupak ili radnju u dijelu kojem je zahvaćena nezakonitošću.
of the Public Procurement Act, related to failures in the segment of evaluation, review and the selection of bids.
Zakona o javnoj nabavi, u vezi sa propustima vezanim za postupak pregleda, ocjene i odabira ponuda.
In the Record no. 2 of the bid review and evaluation, as a reason for rejecting the appellant's bid, the Client invokes provision of Article 46, paragraph 2, item 5
Naručitelj u Zapisniku broj 2 o pregledu i ocjeni ponuda kao razlog isključenja ponude žalitelja navodi odredbu članka 46. stavak 2. točka 5.
Invoking failure to deliver adequate competency evidence as a reason to reject a bid, is contradictory to the analysis of requested and given competency evidence.
Navođenje kao razloga neprihvatljivosti nedostavljanje odgovarajućeg dokaza o sposobnosti je kontradiktoran samoj analizi traženih i danih dokaza o sposobnosti.
The record of bid review and evaluation must contain clear and valid reasons for bids rejection and selection.
Naime, zapisnik o pregledu i ocjeni ponuda mora sadržavati jasne i valjane razloga isključenja i odabira ponuda.
The appellant requests their costs of appeal procedure be reimbursed in the total amount of HRK 51,213.35, of that HRK 35,539.31 for the appeal composition, HRK 8,174.04 of VAT, and HRK 7,500.00 of reimbursement for the procedure and administrative taxes.
Žalitelj je postavio zahtjev za naknadom troškova žalbenog postupka u ukupnom iznosu od 51.213,35 kuna i to 35.539,31 kunu za sastav žalbe, 8.174,04 kn PDV-a, 7.500,00 kn naknade postupka te upravnu pristojbu.
of the Public Procurement Act, it was decided that the Client shall reimburse to the appellant the costs of appeal procedure in the amount of HRK 7,500.00.
Zakona o javnoj nabavi odlučeno je da naručitelj nadoknadi žalitelju troškove žalbenog postupka u iznosu od 7.500,00 kuna za naknadu.
Given the fact that the appeal was accepted pursuant to Article 158, paragraph 4
Obzirom da je žalba usvojena sukladno članku 158. stavak 4.
Article 158, paragraph 2
Člankom 158. stavkom 2.
of the Public Procurement Act prescribes that the State Commission makes decisions on the appeal procedure costs, determines who shall bear the procedure costs and their amount, who shall be paid and the due deadline, and pursuant to paragraph 4 of the same Article, the party who initiated the procedure, and who is the loosing party in the procedure, shall reimburse to the opposing party reasonable costs accrued as a result of participating in the procedure.
Zakona o javnoj nabavi propisano je da Državna komisija rješava o troškovima žalbenog postupka, određuje tko snosi troškove postupka i njihov iznos, te kome se i u kojem roku moraju platiti, a prema stavku 4. istoga članka propisano je da stranka koja je izazvala postupak, a na čiju je štetu postupak okončan, dužna protivnoj stranci nadoknaditi opravdane troškove koji su joj nastali sudjelovanjem u postupku.
However, in relation to the procedure in question, this body finds that the attorney representation related to the appeal composition is unreasonable.
Međutim, ovo tijelo je ocijenilo da u predmetnom postupku zastupanje odvjetnika kod sastava žalbe nije bilo opravdano.
Article 143, paragraph 1
Naime, člankom 143. stavkom I.
of the Public Procurement Act prescribes the appeal composition, and Article 145 of
Zakona o javnoj nabavi propisan je sadržaj žalbe, a u članku 145.
the Act, prescribes the submission process of the appeal.
Zakona način njenog izjaVljivanja.
To act upon the appeal, in accordance with Article 144, paragraph 2
Za postupanje po žalbi, sukladno članku 144. stavku 2.