natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The defendant is accused that from May 11 until June 12 2009 in Osijek, in the state of mental incapacity due to a severe mental disorder, falsely reported in numerous occasions to the Osiječko Baranjska Police department's police officers that his ex wife has been procuring juvenile female-residents of the Home for upbringing children and youth in Osijek and that he persuaded two female-residents of the mentioned Home to write letters according to his dictation in which they report prostitution and procurement of female-residents, and that he paid them a certain amount of money for this.
Optuženog se tereti da je od 11. svibnja do 12. lipnja 2009. u Osijeku, u neubrojivu stanju uslijed težeg duševnog poremećaja, u više navrata policijskim službenicima PU osječko-baranjske neistinito prijavio kako njegova bivša supruga podvodi maloljetne štićenice Doma za odgoj djece i mladeži u Osijeku te nagovorio dvije štićenice navedenog doma da po njegovom diktatu napišu pisma u kojima prijavljuju prostituiranje i podvođenje štićenica, a za što im je platio određene novčane iznose.
Letters mentioned were submitted to the police and to a larger number of the media which raised large public attention, disturbance of citizens and urgent actions of the police officers."
Navedena pisma predana su policiji i većem broju medija što je izazvalo veliku pozornost javnosti, uznemirenje građana i hitno postupanje policijskih službenika.“
In course of this and the previous month, journalists, again gave space for the 54 year old D.
Tijekom tog mjeseca i mjesec ranije, opet su novinari 54-godišnjem D.
P. to repeat his statement, refusing to accept the facts and stigmatizing the female-residents of the Home further more:
P. otvorili prostor da ponovi navode ne želeći što prihvatiti činjenice i dalje stigmatizirajući štićenice doma:
AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS NO PROSTITUTION GOING ON
A UTVRĐENO JE DA PROSTITUCIJE NIJE BILO
"This all happened because I knew too much.
„Sve se dogodilo jer sam previše znao.
I was to be put away until the whole thing settles down" (he was in custody for 5 months and 11 days)
Trebalo me je skloniti dok se cijela afera ne stiša“ (u pritvoru je bio pet mjeseci i 11 dana)
He said that his apartment was broken into - "They covered up the breaking in because he pointed at the prostitution in the Home" - here he accused the Osijek police department and the Municipal State Attorney Office in Osijek for scandalous cover up of serious theft, police, following a report from the neighbour, found the perpetrators in action.
Pravdao se da su mu provalili u stan - „Zataškali provalu u stan jer je ukazao na prostituciju u Domu“ - tu je optužio da su mu osječka policija i Općinsko državno odvjetništvo u Osijeku na skandalozan način prikrili pokušaj teške krađe, policija je pronašla na djelu, po dojavi susjeda, počinitelje.
He said that the police asked for evidence.
On kazao da je policija tražila dokaze.
It has been determined that there were no elements of the criminal act of serious theft but of high handedness which is persecuted by a private lawsuit and not by official duty.
Utvrđeno da nije bilo kaznenog djela teške krađe već samovlasti a što se progoni po privatnoj tužbi oštećene osobe a ne po službenoj dužnosti.
Municipal State Attorney Office requested that the damaged party D.
Općinsko je državno odvjetništvo tražilo ispitivanje oštećenog D.
Pocrnić should be interrogated but the judge who was handling the court file according to which Pocrnić was in custody did not allow this.
Pocrnića no sudac koji je vodio predmet zbog kojeg je Pocrnić bio u pritvoru nije to dopustio.
Two housebreakers intended to take the passport which one of them left in the apartment (expired).
Dvojica provalnika su htjela uzeti putovnicu jednog od njih koja mu je ostala u stanu (istekla valjanost)
P. was arrested on June 16 while in Osječko Baranjska Police Department a press conference was taking place, at which all allegations stated in news articles regarding existence of an organised chain of juvenile prostitution in Osijek have been denied.
P. uhićen 16. lipnja, dok je u PU osječko-baranjskoj trajala konferencija za novinare na kojoj su demantirani napisi o postojanju organiziranog lanca maloljetničke prostitucije u Osijeku.
Misdemeanour judge sentenced him to14 days of prison - he breached the restraining order for his child.
sutkinja za prekršaje ga osudila na 14 dana zatvora - prekršio sudsku zabranu približavanja djetetu.
"before the 14 day prison sentence expired, an order was given for psychiatric expert evaluation - he has been evaluated as mentally unsound and dangerous for his environment, next day he was accused for a criminal act
„prije isteka 14-dnevnog zatvora dan je nalog za psihijatrijsko vještačenje - proglašen neuračunljivim i opasnim po okolinu, dan kasnije je optužen za kazneno djelo
"Everything which happened to me was because I had discovered about the sexual exploitation of girls from the Home and of the people who participated in it"
„Sve što mi se događalo bila je posljedica onoga što sam saznao o seksualnom iskorištavanju djevojčica iz Doma i tko je sve u tome sudjelovao“
THE JOURNALIST CONTINUES TO REPEAT ALREADY DENIED STATEMENTS on organised chain of prostitution, as an addition to these new information.
NOVINAR I DALJE PONAVLJA DEMANTIRANE TVRDNJE o organiziranom lancu prostitucije, kao dodatak ovim novim informacijama.
"At the press conference in the Osijek Police Department on June 16 this year it was said that the 54 year old citizen of Osijek, and it was Dragutin Pocrnić, persuaded female-residents of the Home for Upbringing of Youth to write letters according to his dictation about a non-existent chain of prostitution and involvement of certain highly positioned persons.
„Na konferenciji za novinare u osječkoj policiji 16. lipnja ove godine rečeno je kako je 54-godišnji Osječanin, a radilo se o Dragutinu Pocrniću, nagovarao štićenice Doma za odgoj mladeži da prema njegovu diktatu pišu pisma o izmišljenom lancu prostitucije i upletenosti nekih visokopozicioniranih osoba.
The Police stated that Pocrnić wanted to get even with them in such a way.
Policija je tvrdila da im se Pocrnić na taj način želio osvetiti.
It was attempted to present to the public that Jutarnjii list bought the story.
Javnosti se pokušalo prikazati da je Jutarnji list nasjeo na priču.
However, Jutarnji list, never used in any of their articles information originating from Pocrnić.
Jutarnji list, međutim, ni u jednom od tekstova nije koristio Pocrnićeve informacije.
Pocrnić only assisted the journalist in making contact with the female-residents, because he knew them and since his son was also a resident of the Home.
Pocrnić je novinaru pomogao samo u kontaktu sa štićenicama jer ih je poznavao s obzirom na to da mu je i sin štićenik doma.
Information we have specified in the articles were first handed, from the female-residents themselves."
Podaci koje smo naveli u tekstovima bili su iz prve ruke, od samih štićenica.“
Six months later, by mid March 2010, another journalist of the same newspaper repeats the statements, again as a sensation, but in a different context:
Nakon šest mjeseci, sredinom ožujka 2010., drugi novinar istog lista ponavlja tvrdnje, opet senzacionalno, ali u drugačijem kontekstu:
"Retired officer of the Croatian Army has been warning for months about the immoral activities in the Osijek Home for Upbringing children and youth.
„Umirovljeni časnik HV-a mjesecima upozorava na nemoralne radnje u osječkom Domu za odgoj djece i mladeži.
Some of the parents also testified about the atrocities through which the residents are going trough in the Home in which sex, drugs and alcohol rule"
I neki roditelji svjedočili su o strahotama koje prolaze štićenici Doma u kojem caruju seks, droga i alkohol“
"Next week the Police Department in Osijek will face personnel rotation.
„Idućeg tjedna Policijsku upravu u Osijeku zadesit će smjene.
Two Heads are leaving their posts", " The story in the corridors is that they are connected to the local members of the power structure who survived political clashes"
Čelna mjesta napuštaju dvojica načelnika“, „U kuloarima ih se povezuje s lokalnim moćnicima koji su preživjeli političke obračune“
"These connections might have remained undercover if there was not for Dragutin Pocrnić (54), a retired officer of the Croatian Army."
„Možda te veze i ne bi postale toliko vidljive da nije bilo Dragutina Pocrnića (54), umirovljenog časnika HV-a.“
"for months now, he has been writing reports and knocking at doors of social institutions, police, prosecution authorities in order to win a judicial battle against his ex wife who took children custody from him after a court proceeding.
„on već mjesecima piše prijave i obilazi urede socijalnih ustanova, policije, tužiteljstva kako bi dobio pravnu bitku protiv bivše supruge koja mu je sudskim putem oduzela skrbništvo nad djecom.
He, also accuses his wife Biljana for organising juvenile prostitution in the Osijek Home for Upbringing of Children and Youth, neglect and abuse of children, possession and selling drugs."
On, naime, optužuje suprugu Biljanu i zbog organiziranja maloljetničke prostitucije u osječkom Domu za odgoj, zanemarivanja i zlostavljanja djece, posjedovanja i prodaje droge.“
All these reports were rejected, he states, because his ex wife "services" the police officials, judicial officials, local power groups, directors and owners of companies.
Sve su te prijave odbačene, tvrdi on, jer njegova bivša supruga “opslužuje” i dužnosnike policije, pravosuđa, lokalne moćnike i direktore i vlasnike tvrtki.
Pocrnić claims that it is the case of retribution from the consumers of the juvenile prostitution, among which most influential city figures can be found, some of them mentioned by the female-residents of the Home.
Pocrnić tvrdi da je riječ o osveti korisnika maloljetničke prostitucije, među kojima su i najutjecajnije gradske figure od kojih su neke spominjale i štićenice doma,
The position of the Principal of the Home, who resigned this month, has been adopted by the committee of the Ministry of Heath - after internal audit was performed and the committee found no evidence of prostitution.
Stajalište ravnateljice Doma, koja je ovog mjeseca dala ostavku, zauzela je i komisija Ministarstva zdravstva - nakon provedene interne revizije komisija je ustanovila da nema dokaza o prostituciji
life of Dragutin Pocrnić has changed during last few days - expert evaluation performed by the psychiatric hospital in Vrapče are more in favour of his sanity, and the court annulled the decision of the Centre for Social Welfare by which he was deprived of custody over his children.
život Dragutina Pocrnića posljednjih se dana promijenio - završena su vještačenja psihijatrijske bolnice u Vrapču koja idu u prilog njegovoj uravnoteženosti, a sud je poništio odluku Centra za socijalnu skrb kojom mu se oduzimaju djeca
In his new report against his ex wife Biljana Pocrnić, Dragutin Pocrnić has enclosed a statement given by his daughter in which all the allegations about the prostitution were confirmed, it also names a police officer from Osijek who was, allegedly, a regular customer of his ex wife.
U novoj prijavi protiv bivše supruge Biljane Pocrnić Dragutin Pocrnić je priložio i iskaz svoje kćeri, u kojem se potvrđuju navodi o prostituciji, navodi i ime jednog osječkog policijskog službenika koji je, navodno, bio redoviti klijent njegove bivše supruge.
Based on the appeal of the Municipality State Attorney Office Osijek, the County Court Osijek abrogated the first degree judgement and returned the judgement for repeated proceedings.
Povodom žalbe ODO Osijek, Županijski sud u Osijek ukinuo je prvostupanjsku presudu i predmet vratio na ponovno suđenje.
Facts:
Činjenice:
- Council has during procedures concluded that there were no evidence that the defendant has committed the criminal crime - procedure has been returned to the beginning
- Vijeće je tijekom postupka zaključilo da nema dokaza kako je okrivljeni počinio kazneno djelo - postupak je sada vraćen na početak
- the very procedure as well as the reading of judgement explanation were closed for the public in order to protect the dignity of juvenile persons connected with the scandal.
- Sami postupak kao i čitanje obrazloženja presude bili su zatvoreni za javnost zbog čuvanja digniteta maloljetnih osoba povezanih s aferom.
By a court order Pocrnić has been released from the Zagreb Hospital for Persons in Custody - who protected the dignity of girls during the media coverage which lasted for several months and which ended up being false, did anyone warn the media that they were crossing the line with repeated publishing of false information and statements of female-residents, photographs of the home, who protected the dignity of the defendant's son from the accused, since he himself was not protecting it
Pocrnić je odlukom suda pušten iz zagrebačke Bolnice za osobe lišene slobode - tko je štitio dignitet djevojka tijekom višemjesečnih napisa koji su se pokazali netočnima, je li netko upozorio medije da prelaze granicu opetovanom objavom netočnosti i izjava štićenica, fotografija doma, tko je štitio dignitet tog sina od okrivljenog budući da ga ni sam nije štitio
- immediately after the scandal broke the police top officials denied existence of the organised chain of prostitution in the Osijek Home for Upbringing Children and Youth, claiming that none of the persons stated in the letters written by juvenile girls was not involved in such an activity.
- odmah po izbijanju afere sam policijski vrh demantirao postojanje organiziranog lanca prostitucije u osječkom Domu za odgoj djece i mladeži navodeći kako nitko od osoba navedenih u pismima maloljetnih djevojaka nije upleten u tako što.
- Pocrnić, whose child was also placed in this Home, organized it all to discredit his ex wife and some distinguished persons with whom he was in some kind of conflict.
- Pocrnić, kojemu je i dijete smješteno u taj Dom, sve je to organizirao kako bi diskreditirao svoju bivšu suprugu kao i dio uglednih osoba s kojima je bio u nekoj vrsti sukoba.
was it necessary to reveal the history of illness of the defendant
je li bilo potrebno otkrivanje povijesti bolesti okrivljenika
was it necessary to reveal details by which girls could be recognised, even by their immediate environment
je li bilo nužno otkrivanje pojedinosti po kojima su se djevojke mogle prepoznati pa čak i njihova okolina ih je mogla prepoznati
what could have the State Attorney's Office done and has it done all in its power- asked for investigation, did not reveal nor it appeared in the media without determined facts, not even when the indictment proposal was filed, but only when the appeal was announced
što je državno odvjetništvo moglo učiniti i je li učinilo sve - zatražilo je provođenje istražnih radnji, nije iznosilo i nije se pojavljivalo u medijima bez utvrđenih činjenica pa ni kada je podnijet optužni prijedlog, teka kada je najavljena žalba
if the State Attorney must protect juvenile girls, according to the law, and if it is obligated to treat ill persons with special care according to the law, how to fight the media which continue repeating "their own truth"?
ako državno odvjetništvo mora štiti maloljetne djevojke, sukladno zakonu, i ako mora se s posebnom pažnjom odnositi prema bolesnim osobama, sukladno zakonu, kako se boriti s medijima koji i dalje ponavljaju „svoju istinu“?
I would like to, after more than a year of publishing fabricated allegations, and less determined facts, give the whole file to all "hungry" journalists, but we are not allowed to do that, and the question remains how to present facts and the determined truth
najradije bi, nakon više od godine dana objavljivanja iskonstruiranih navoda, a manje utvrđenih činjenica, cijeli spis dao na listanje svim tim „gladnim“ novinarima, a što mi ne smijemo, i pitanje je kako iznijeti činjenice odnosno utvrđenu istinu
we remind of the Article
podsjećamo, čl.
36 of the Law on State Attorney: in the work of the State Attorney the following are considered confidential, files in the competence of the State Attorney for Youth, files of the State Attorney during inquest and other activities of the State Attorney until the decision on reporting is made, files of the State Attorney on collecting evidence before the investigation, even when there is no ongoing investigation, files of the State Attorney during investigation
36 Zakona o državnom odvjetništvu: u radu državnog odvjetništva smatraju se tajnima, predmeti iz nadležnosti državnog odvjetnika za mladež, spisi državnog odvjetništva za vrijeme provođenja izvida i drugih radnji u državnom odvjetništvu do donošenja odluke o prijavi, spisi državnog odvjetništva o dokaznim radnjama prije pokretanja istrage i kada se ne provodi istraga, spisi državnog odvjetništva tijekom istrage,
had in mind the Law on Juvenile Courts
imalo je umu Zakon o sudovima za mladež
children ombudsman was extremely lenient, since in some other cases she was much more harsh!, her reaction in form of action was absent, not only in speaking, she mentioned the essential point: it is important to protect the children also from media exposure"
izrazito je bila blaga pravobraniteljica za djecu budući da je u nekim slučajevima bila puno oštrija!, izostala je njena reakcija u vidu činjenja a ne samo govorenja, rekla je bit: važno je zaštiti djecu i od medijske izloženosti“
The State Attorney Office positioned itself well in these writings and the procedure, although, after repeated allegations, it asked itself the question "what is the point in determining facts when journalists do not care about the facts and when the journalists will continue to take sides with the alleged fighter for justice
državno odvjetništvo se dobro pozicioniralo u tim napisima i postupku, iako je, slijedom kasnijih ponovo objavljenih navoda, postavljalo si pitanje „čemu utvrđivati činjenice kada do činjenica novinarima nije stalo i kada će novinari i dalje zauzeti stranu navodnog borca za pravde
could we have and what could we have done more?
je li se i što moglo drugo poduzeti?
" Denial of incorrect statements published in weekly magazine Nacional"
„Ispravak netočnih tvrdnji objavljenih u tjedniku Nacional
736 on December 22 2009, untruths were presented, or to be more precise, repeated, about the work of the State Attorney Office of Republic of Croatia and the Chief Prosecutor Mladen Bajić
736. od 22. prosinca 2009., iznesene su ili, bolje rečeno, ponovljene, neistine o radu Državnog odvjetništva Republike Hrvatske i Glavnog državnog odvjetnika Mladena Bajića.
This communique of the same content was sent to the weekly magazine Nacional for publishing according to the Articles
Ovo priopćenje u istom je sadržaju upućeno i tjedniku Nacional radi objave sukladno čl.
of the Media Act
Zakon o medijima:
It is the case of an ordinary repeated malicious imputation and an attempt of defamation of SAORH and the Chief Prosecutor Mladen Bajić.
Radi se o najobičnijem ponovljenom zlonamjernom podmetanju i pokušaju blaćenja DORH-a i Glavnog državnog odvjetnika Mladena Bajića.
Evidently, if such check up was performed, it would have been determined that neither the Chief Prosecutor nor the SAORH never received such reports.
Naravno, da je takva provjera učinjena, utvrdilo bi se da Glavnom državnom odvjetniku niti DORH-u takva izvješća nikada nisu ni dostavljena.
SAORC has on several occasions informed the public about the international legal assistance to the competent bodies of many countries and about the exceptionally good cooperation with competent bodies of Republic of Austria, with a goal to check the cash transfers under suspicion of being misappropriated by a larger number of persons from the funds allocated for reconstruction and defence of sovereignty of Republic of Croatia.
DORH je već u niz navrata izvješćivao javnost o međunarodnoj pravnoj pomoći prema nadležnim tijelima mnogih država te o izuzetno dobroj suradnji s nadležnim tijelima Republike Austrije, a u cilju provjere tijekova novca za koji postoji sumnja da je otuđen od strane većeg broja osoba iz sredstava namijenjenih obnovi i obrani suvereniteta Republike Hrvatske.
The denial was published in the next issue of the weekly magazine Nacional.
Tekst ispravka je objavljen u tjedniku Nacional, naredni broj.
On that occasion he repeated the false statements which were previously already officially denied.
Tom je prilikom ponovio netočne tvrdnje a koje su već ranije demantirane.
"A journalist Hrvoje Appelt was a guest of a Croatian television show "Croatia live" on August 13 2010.
„U emisiji „Hrvatska uživo“ Hrvatske televizije od 13. kolovoza 2010. gostovao je novinar Hrvoje Appelt.
On criminal nature of its operation".
O kriminalnom načinu njezina poslovanja“.
The quoted statement is not true.
Navedena tvrdnja nije točna.
Such statement, published in a weekly magazine and repeated in your show, is a case of malicious imputation and an attempt of defamation of SAORH and the Chief Prosecutor Mladen Bajić.
Takva tvrdnja, objavljena u tjedniku a ponovljena u Vašoj emisiji, predstavlja zlonamjerno podmetanje i pokušaj blaćenja DORH-a i Glavnog državnog odvjetnika Mladena Bajića.
Namely, your guest by no means proved or explained to the viewers if or when such reports were compiled by HANFA and CNB, and if and when were they delivered to the Chief Prosecutor.
Naime, Vaš gost nije ničime gledateljima dokazao niti razjasnio jesu li i kada sastavljena takva izvješća od strane HANFA-e i HNB-a, i jesu li i kada dostavljena Glavnom državnom odvjetniku.
Therefore, we stress out once more, that such reports were never delivered neither to the Chief Prosecutor Mladen Bajić nor to SAORC.
Stoga, ponovo naglašavamo, kako niti Glavnom državnom odvjetniku Mladenu Bajiću niti DORH-u takva izvješća nikada nisu dostavljena.
It is the journalists' rule of conduct to check the accuracy of information, in this case no inquiry from the journalist was placed, just a statement, untrue.
pravilo je novinara provjeriti točnost informacija, u ovom slučaju nije bilo novinarskog upita već samo tvrdnja, netočna.
Even the source of information was not quoted, just their unofficial but highly reliable sources,
Čak se nije ni citirao izvor informacija, već njihovi neslužbeni ali dobro provjereni izvori,
The journalist who presented his statements on television additionally encouraged the public to believe the inaccurate statements, although they have been denied and accurate information was presented
Novinar koji je iznio svoje tvrdnje na televiziji dodatno je ponukao javnost da povjeruje u netočne tvrdnje iako se one opovrgnute i dana je točna informacija
of course, we should have in mind that journalists have their agenda and that they will make an effort to "sell their story"
naravno, treba imati na umu da novinari imaju svoj cilj i da će svoju priču „nastojati prodati“
the State Attorney office is in a weaker position because the denials are rarely read and the first information is more likely to be remembered, not the reaction, but by publishing on the website we ensure the possibility to get to the facts by browsing
državno odvjetništvo je u slabijoj poziciji jer tekstove ispravaka malo tko čita i prije se zapamti prvotna informacija a ne reagiranje., no upravo objavom na internetskoj stranici dajemo mogućnost da pretraživanjem dođu do činjenica
The Media have a duty to respect the privacy, dignity, reputation and honour of the citizens.
Mediji su dužni poštovati privatnost, dostojanstvo, ugled i čast građana.
A weekly magazine Nacional published an article containing false information and statements upon which the State Attorney Office of Republic of Croatia reacted according to the Media Act
U tjedniku Nacional je objavljen tekst s netočnim informacijama i tvrdnjama na koje je Državno odvjetništvo Republike Hrvatske reagiralo sukladno Zakonu o medijima.
Following text was sent to the magazine Nacional and was published in its full length on the website:
Tekst upućen i tjedniku Nacional i objavljen u cijelosti na internetskoj stranici: