natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
if he/she was not a member of the management board or a key function holder in the credit institution in question in the last five years;
ako u posljednjih pet godina nije bio član uprave ili nositelj ključne funkcije u toj kreditnoj instituciji,
if he/she is not an employee of the undertaking connected with the credit institution or has not been an employee not covered by item 3) of that credit institution or an undertaking connected with the credit institution;
ako nije zaposlenik društva koje je povezano s kreditnom institucijom ili u posljednje tri godine nije bio zaposlenik koji nije pokriven točkom 3) te kreditne institucije ili s njom povezanog društva,
if he/she, apart from the compensation received for performing the function of a supervisory board member of that credit institution and undertakings connected with the credit institution, does not receive nor has received any material compensation;
ako osim naknade za obnašanje funkcije člana nadzornog odbora od kreditne institucije i s njom povezanih društava ne prima niti je primao značajnu naknadu,
if he/she is not or was not in the last three years a member, partner or employee of an audit firm which provides or has provided audit services to the credit institution or to an undertaking connected with it;
ako nije ili u posljednje tri godine nije bio član, partner ili zaposlenik revizorskog društva koje pruža ili je pružalo revizorske usluge kreditnoj instituciji ili s njom povezanom društvu,
if he/she is not a member of the management board of another undertaking in which a member of the management board of the credit institution is a member of the supervisory board;
ako nije član uprave drugog društva u kojem je član uprave kreditne institucije član nadzornog odbora,
if he/she is not connected with members of the management board of the credit institution; and
ako nije povezan s članovima uprave kreditne institucije i
if he/she has not been a member of the supervisory board of that credit institution for over 12 years.
ako nije član nadzornog odbora te kreditne institucije više od 12 godina.
Application for prior approval for supervisory board members
Zahtjev za izdavanje prethodne suglasnosti za obavljanje funkcije člana nadzornog odbora
The application for prior approval to perform the function of a member of the supervisory board of a credit institution is to be submitted by the management board of the credit institution (or in the case of establishing a credit institution, its founders) at least three months before expiry of the term of office of an individual member of the supervisory board, for a maximum term of office of four years.
Zahtjev za izdavanje prethodne suglasnosti za obavljanje funkcije člana nadzornog odbora kreditne institucije podnosi uprava kreditne institucije (odnosno kod osnivanja kreditne institucije njezini osnivači) najmanje tri mjeseca prije isteka mandata pojedinog člana nadzornog odbora, za mandat koji ne može biti duži od četiri godine.
Statement of the Croatian National Bank regarding the issue of foreign currency savings of Croatian citizens in Ljubljanska banka
Očitovanje Hrvatske narodne banke o problemu devizne štednje hrvatskih građana u Ljubljanskoj banci
The issue of unpaid foreign currency savings of Croatian citizens in the former Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb has again come under the spotlight in connection with the intended entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka or its qualified co-owner into the Croatian banking system.
U posljednje vrijeme iznova se aktualizira pitanje neisplaćene devizne štednje hrvatskih građana u nekadašnjoj Glavnoj filijali Zagreb Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana, a vezano za željeni ulazak Nove Ljubljanske banke ili njenog kvalificiranog suvlasnika u hrvatski bankovni sustav.
This, as the Croatian National Bank has stated previously, is unacceptable, until at least resolution is found to the issue of that part of debts of Ljubljanska banka to Croatian citizens which involves the so-called untransferred foreign currency savings.
Kao što je poznato, Hrvatska narodna banka smatra da je to neprihvatljivo, dok se ne riješi barem onaj dio dugovanja Ljubljanske banke hrvatskim građanima koji se odnosi na tzv. neprenesenu deviznu štednju.
The Slovene side would not accept such an option in the past.
Slovenska strana to u proteklom razdoblju nije prihvaćala.
In defending their rejective position, some Slovene officials have gone so far as to ignore or distort irrefutable facts, or even, as we witnessed in the last few days the attempts of Slovene individuals in prominent positions, to threat to block Croatia's entry into the European Union (which, as the latest news suggest, has been denied) or to dismiss Croatia on the basis of offensive disqualifications.
Obrazlažući svoj odbijajući stav, pojedini slovenski dužnosnici nisu prezali ni od ignoriranja ili čak izvrtanja nepobitnih činjenica, a posljednjih dana pojedinci na istaknutim pozicijama nisu se suzdržavali čak ni od prijetnji blokadom Hrvatske na putu u Europsku uniju (što je, prema najnovijim vijestima, ipak opovrgnuto), pa čak i od uvredljivih diskvalifikacija.
In view of this situation, it is worth underlining some of the key Slovene positions regarding this issue and examine the extent of their "foundation in facts", leaving aside at this point the contradictory nature of some of them.
Vrijedi stoga podsjetiti na neke od osnovnih slovenskih teza koje se plasiraju oko ovog slučaja i osvrnuti se na njihovu "utemeljenost", ostavljajući ovom prigodom po strani i međusobnu kontradiktornost nekih od njih.
The branch office acts for the account of its parent bank while the parent bank guarantees for the liabilities of its branch with its entire assets, without limitation (which is not a feature specific of Croatia only but an international standard applied throughout Europe).
Filijala posluje za račun matične banke, a matična banka jamči za njene obveze cjelokupnom svojom imovinom, bez ograničenja (što nije nikakav ovdašnji specifikum, već međunarodni standard, koji vrijedi i svuda u Europi).
This means that depositors of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, which had no legal personality, were and remained in a contractual relation with the parent Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana.
To ujedno znači da su i štediše Glavne filijale Zagreb, koja nije imala status pravne osobe, bili i ostali u ugovornom odnosu s matičnom Ljubljanskom bankom d.d. Ljubljana.
Position 2 - The obligations of Ljubljanska banka terminated with Yugoslavia's dissolution, depositors' foreign currency savings had been guaranteed by the former Yugoslavia, and Nova Ljubljanska banka has nothing to do with Ljubljanska banka.
2. teza - Raspadom Jugoslavije obveza Ljubljanske banke je prestala, štedišama je za deviznu štednju jamčila bivša federacije, a Nova Ljubljanska banka nema nikakve veze s Ljubljanskom bankom.
Deposit guarantees are activated (again, not something specific to this case only) when a bank goes into bankruptcy, which was not the case with Ljubljanska banka.
Jamstvo za štednju aktivira se (što također nije nikakva ovdašnja posebnost) kad banka završi u stečaju, što kod Ljubljanske banke nije bio slučaj.
This bank continued to operate under the same name for several years after the break-up of the former Yugoslavia and was later transformed to Nova Ljubljanska banka.
Ona je još nekoliko godina nakon raspada bivše federacije redovno poslovala pod istim imenom, a zatim je pretvorena u Novu Ljubljansku banku.
This was done after courts, both in and outside Slovenia, started ruling in favour of the first depositors who initiated court proceedings to retrieve their savings.
To je učinjeno nakon što su sudovi i u Sloveniji i izvan nje počeli donositi presude u korist štediša koji su prvi pokrenuli sudske postupke da bi došli do svojih štednih uloga.
Evidently, the purpose of this transformation was to help Nova Ljubljanska banka to rid itself of the obligations of its predecessor towards depositors outside Slovenia.
Takav potez realiziran je s evidentnom namjerom da se Nova Ljubljanska banka otarasi obveza svoje prethodnice prema štedišama izvan Slovenije.
In this "transformation" Nova Ljubljanska banka took over practically the entire assets of Ljubljanska banka, including, naturally, all its depositors in Slovenia.
U toj "pretvorbi" Nova Ljubljanska banka preuzela je praktički sveukupnu imovinu Ljubljanske banke, a naravno i sve njene štediše u Sloveniji.
Moreover, the July 1994 Constitutional Act, on which this operation was based, made it impossible for non-Slovene depositors to collect their claims on the basis of court decisions.
Štoviše, Ustavnim zakonom iz srpnja 1994. godine, na kojemu se ta operacija zasnivala, ne-slovenskim štedišama je onemogućeno da naplate svoja potraživanja temeljem sudskih rješenja.
Position 3 - The obligations of Ljubljanska banka towards Croatian depositors would already have been settled had it not been for the Croatian National Bank which made the operations of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, or the entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka impossible.
3. teza - Obveze Ljubljanske banke prema hrvatskim štedišama već bi bile izmirene da Hrvatska narodna banka nije "onemogućila poslovanje zagrebačkoj filijali" odnosno ulazak Novoj Ljubljanskoj banci.
However, the facts speak of the opposite.
Činjenice govore nešto sasvim drugo.
This was never done.
To, međutim, nikad nije učinjeno.
Instead of the recapitalisation of the branch office by its parent bank, it has been suggested that Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb be recapitalised largely by funding from the Croatian Fund for Development.
Umjesto da ju dokapitalizira matična banka, predloženo je da se zagrebačka filijala Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana dokapitalizira najvećim dijelom sredstvima - Hrvatskog fonda za razvoj.
Obviously, the Croatian side was not interested in this model of revitalisation of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb.
Iz razumljivih razloga, za takav model osposobljavanja Glavne filijale Zagreb Ljubljanske banke d.d. hrvatska strana nije imala interesa.
As a token of its good will, however, and confident that the parent bank will ultimately find a mutually acceptable resolution, the Croatian National Bank tolerated some degree of operations of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb for a number of years.
No, u znak dobro volje i u uvjerenju da će matična banka ipak iznaći neko obostrano prihvatljivo rješenje, zagrebačkoj filijali je Hrvatska narodna banka još godinama tolerirala određeni opseg poslovanja.
More specifically, it allowed the bank to perform domestic payment system services in connection with collection of its claims and servicing of its liabilities.
Preciznije rečeno, dopušteni su joj poslovi domaćeg platnog prometa za potrebe naplate njenih potraživanja i izvršavanja njenih obveza.
This was not done and now repayment of savings is made conditional upon previous, direct or indirect, entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka into the Croatian financial market.
To nije učinjeno, ali se sad isplata štednje uvjetuje prethodnim, izravnim ili posrednim, ulaskom Nove Ljubljanske banke na hrvatsko financijsko tržište.
It is worth mentioning here that Bosnia and Herzegovina permitted the entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka into the country's banking system, but obligations towards depositors have nonetheless remained unsettled.
Uzgred rečeno, u Bosni i Hercegovini omogućen je ulazak Nove Ljubljanske banke u bankovni sustav, ali obveze prema štedišama ipak nisu izmirene.
Position 4 - By permitting its citizens to transfer their savings from the branch offices of banks with a head office registered outside Croatia to the Croatian banks, the Republic of Croatia has assumed an obligation to all depositors, including to those who still have valid savings books of Ljubljanska banka.
4. teza - Omogućivši svojim građanima da prenesu svoju štednju iz filijala banaka sa sjedištem izvan Hrvatske u ovdašnje banke, Republika Hrvatska preuzela je na sebe obvezu prema svim štedišama, pa i onima koji još imaju važeće štedne knjižice Ljubljanske banke.
After gaining autonomy, the Republic of Croatia permitted its citizens, with an aim of gaining the citizens' confidence in its banking system, to choose either to remain in a direct contractual relationship, under private law, with banks outside the territory of Croatia or to transfer their claims to the Republic of Croatia which would in turn guarantee a gradual repayment of savings over a ten-year period.
Republika Hrvatska je nakon osamostaljenja - u cilju izgradnje povjerenja građana u svoj bankovni sustav - omogućila svojim građanima da izaberu hoće li ostati u izravnom privatno-pravnom ugovornom odnosu s bankama sa sjedištem izvan Hrvatske ili će svoja potraživanja prepustiti Republici Hrvatskoj, a ona će im jamčiti postupnu isplatu štednje tijekom deset godina.
Approximately two-thirds of the total foreign currency savings in Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb were transferred and about one-third of depositors believed that they would obtain their money in a much faster and easier way if they retained their valid savings books of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana.
Otprilike dvije trećine štednje od ukupne devizne štednje u Glavnoj filijali Zagreb je preneseno, a vlasnici približno jedne trećine štednje vjerovali su da će lakše i brže do svog novca ako u svojim rukama zadrže važeće štedne knjižice Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana.
Consequently, according to the available data, the Croatian citizens have a direct claim of about DEM 312 million of principal plus interest, on the basis of untransferred savings in Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, while the claim of the Croatian government for the repaid transferred savings is almost double.
Dakle, temeljem neprenesene štednje u zagrebačkoj filijali Ljubljanske banke hrvatski građani izravno potražuju prema raspoloživim podacima oko 312 milijuna DEM glavnice plus kamate, a hrvatska država još gotovo dvaput toliko za isplaćenu prenesenu štednju.
Position 5 - Slovenia did not benefit from the branch offices of Ljubljanska banka in Croatia, so why expect Slovenia to have any obligations to their depositors?
5. teza - Slovenija nije imala nikakve koristi od poslovnica Ljubljanske banke u Hrvatskoj, pa zašto bi onda imala i obveze prema njihovim štedišama.
No person has ever founded a bank to benefit the local population and enterprises, but for its own business interests, which was also the case with Ljubljanska banka.
Nitko nikad nije otvarao banke iz dobročinstva prema lokalnom stanovništvu i poduzećima, već zbog vlastitih poslovnih interesa, pa tako i Ljubljanska banka.
The available data show that the total amount of foreign currency savings deposited by all banks from Slovenia (including Ljubljanska banka system in Slovenia and other banks) with the National Bank of Yugoslavia exceeded by only about twenty percent the deposited amount originating from foreign currency savings with Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb.
Raspoloživi podaci pokazuju da je ukupni iznos devizne štednje koji su sve banke iz Slovenije (dakle i cijeli tamošnji sustav Ljubljanske banke i ostale) deponirale kod Narodne banke Jugoslavije bio samo za dvadesetak posto veći od iznosa deponiranog iz same zagrebačke podružnice Ljubljanske banke.
Position 6 - The dinar amounts provided by the National Bank of Yugoslavia to Ljubljanska banka d.d., Ljubljana in the form of interest-free loans, in exchange for the foreign currency savings of Croatian citizens, have been used for extending loans to Croatian companies through Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb.
6. teza - Dinarima koje je Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana dobila u obliku beskamatnog kredita od Narodne banke Jugoslavije, kao protuvrijednost za deponiranu deviznu štednju prikupljenu od hrvatskih građana, kreditirane su putem zagrebačke filijale hrvatske tvrtke.
It is neither depositors' concern nor can they have any influence on a bank's decisions as to whom it will provide loans from its funds.
Štediša se ne tiče niti imaju ikakvog utjecaja na odluke banke koga će kreditirati raspoloživim sredstvima.
It is therefore inconceivable that in any civilized country in the world the liabilities of a bank to its depositors would be challenged on the grounds that their money has been used for financing a loan to a company which has failed to repay it.
Stoga je nezamislivo bilo gdje u civiliziranom svijetu da se obveza banke prema svom štediši osporava tvrdnjom da je njegovim novcem kreditirana neka tvrtka od koje nije naplaćen dug.
But aside from that, it should be noted that, according to the data of Ljubljanska banka d.d Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, its balance sheet at the end of 1989 stood at USD 809 million.
No, i neovisno o tome, treba reći da je prema vlastitim podacima Glavne filijale Zagreb Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana, njena bilanca na kraju 1989. godine iznosila 809 milijuna USD.
In the structure of liabilities, total savings deposits of citizens participated with as much as 83 percent and foreign currency deposits with 76 percent or USD 611.6 million (the rest related to capital accounts and interbank transactions).
U strukturi pasive čak 83 posto činila je ukupna štednja građana, a devizna štednja 76 posto odnosno 611,6 milijuna USD (ostalo se odnosilo na kapital i međubankovne transakcije).
In the structure of assets, claims on the National Bank of Yugoslavia, based on foreign currency deposits of citizens, accounted for as much as 74 percent; credit transactions with the parent bank accounted for 14 percent, while placements to the business sector and citizens from Croatia and Slovenia accounted for only 12.6 percent!
U aktivi bilance čak 74 posto odnosilo se na potraživanja od NBJ po osnovi deviznih depozita građana, 14 posto činili su uglavnom kreditni odnosi s matičnom bankom, a svega 12,6 posto plasmani gospodarstvu i građanima s područja Hrvatske i Slovenije!
Position 7 - When liabilities and claims of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb are considered, they are at least mutually offset or the Croatian debt is even higher!
7. teza - Kad se uzmu u račun dugovanja i potraživanja Glavne filijale Zagreb Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana, ona se u najmanju ruku poništavaju ili je čak hrvatski dug veći!
In that context we learnt about an interesting detail in Slovene media these days: in the balance sheet of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb as at the end of 2005 the liabilities to 132 thousands foreign currency depositors are recorded as amounting to EUR 172 million.
U tom smislu vrlo je zanimljiv još jedan detalj o kojemu ovih dana saznajemo iz slovenskih medija: u bilanci zagrebačke filijale Ljubljanske banke, sa stanjem krajem prošle godine vodi se kao obveza prema 132 tisuće deviznih ulagača ukupno 172 milijuna eura obveza.
It seems that the value of money also depends on the person that should (re)pay it.
Valjda i vrijednost novca ovisi o tome tko bi ga trebao (na)platiti.
Position 8 - The Republic of Croatia does not respect international agreements, in this case Annex C to the Agreement on Succession Issues, signed by ministers of foreign affairs of successor states to the former SFRY in Vienna on 29 June 2001.
8. teza - Republika Hrvatska ne poštuje međunarodne ugovore, u konkretnom slučaju Aneks C Ugovora o pitanjima sukcesije, koji su potpisali ministri vanjskih poslova država sljednica bivše SFRJ u Beču 29.6.2001. godine.
When it comes to liabilities arising from foreign currency savings, the representatives of Slovenia interpret the Agreement by referring to the «territorial principle» under which every successor state to the former Yugoslavia must accept guarantees for total savings deposits collected in its current territory, regardless of the bank in which the savings were deposited.
Kad je riječ o obvezama za štednju, slovenski predstavnici se u tumačenju tog Ugovora pozivaju na "načelo teritorijalnosti", tj. da svaka od država sljednica bivše federacije mora preuzeti jamstva za sveukupnu štednju prikupljenu na njenom današnjem području, bez obzira u koju banku je položena.
Without these deposits Slovenia's share in the distribution of assets would be considerably lower (about 13.26 percent).
Bez tih depozita i udjel Slovenije u raspodjeli imovine bio bi znatno niži (oko 13,26 posto).
Thus, the distribution of assets should be made according to one principle, while the liabilities towards depositors should be met according to a different one?!
Dakle, kod podjele prava trebao bi vrijediti jedan princip, kod izmirivanja obveza prema štedišama drugi?!
Position 9 - The Republic of Croatia has made an agreement within the framework of the Bank for International Settlements in Basel and the IMF impossible.
9. teza - Republika Hrvatska onemogućila je i dogovor u okviru Banke za međunarodna poravnanja u Baselu, kao i MMF-a.
No negotiations on the issue were conducted within the framework of the IMF, nor are such negotiations planned.
Nikakvih pregovora o ovom pitanju u okrilju MMF-a nije bilo, niti su predviđeni.
The negotiations in Basel indeed started a few years ago, led by the former Swiss central bank Governor.
Pregovori u Baselu doista su započeti još prije nekoliko godina, pod vodstvom bivšeg švicarskog guvernera.
However, after it has been established that the standpoints and interests of Slovenia (and its Ljubljanska banka) on one side, and Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia (and their citizens that deposited their savings with branch offices of Ljubljanska banka) on the other side, are completely opposite and irreconcilable, the negotiations ended without any results.
No, nakon što se ispostavilo da su stajališta i interesi Slovenije (i njene Ljubljanske banke) s jedne strane te Hrvatske, Bosne i Hercegovine i Makedonije (i njihovih građana koji su štedjeli u filijalama Ljubljanske banke) s druge strane oprečni i nepomirljivi, pregovori su okončani bez rezultata.
Position 10 - The Republic of Croatia, especially the Croatian National Bank and its Governor, act in an «anti-European» and discriminating way, violating the European acquis on free capital movement.
10. teza - Republika Hrvatska, a napose Hrvatska narodna banka i njen guverner, ponašaju se "neeuropski" i diskriminatorski, te krše europske pravne stečevine u pogledu slobodnog kretanja kapitala.
To accuse the state with 92 percent of its banking system in foreign ownership of restricting free movement of capital is absurd indeed.
Predbacivati državi u kojoj je 92 posto bankovnog sustava u stranom vlasništvu da onemogućava slobodno kretanje kapitala uistinu je apsurdno.
Denying the central bank of any country the right to assess whether the bank seeking to enter its banking system would contribute to its credibility and stability, while taking into account that bank's stance on legal and contractual obligations, cannot be based on any part of «European acquis».
Osporavati pravo središnjoj banci bilo koje države da procijeni da li banka koja pokušava ući u njen bankovni sustav pridonosi njegovoj vjerodostojnosti i stabilnosti, te da pritom vodi računa i o odnosu te banke prema zakonskim propisima i ugovornim obvezama, nespojivo je također s bilo kakvim "europskim pravnim stečevinama".
Insinuations that the Governor of the Croatian National Bank is closing the doors of the European Union to Croatia by demanding that Croatian depositors finally be given the possibility to access their money, as well as references to the dismissal of the Italian Governor (on account of his acting in favour of a bank connected with him via personal relations and abundant gifts to his family), represent a level of public communication that we do not want to descend to.
Podmetanje na račun guvernera Hrvatske narodne banke, kako on svojim zahtjevom da se hrvatskim štedišama konačno omogući pristup njihovom novcu zatvara Hrvatskoj vrata Europske unije, te povezivanje ovog slučaja sa smjenom talijanskog guvernera (zbog favoriziranja jedne od banaka s kojom su ga povezivale osobne veze i izdašni obiteljski pokloni), razina je javne komunikacije na koju se ne želimo spuštati.