natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Throughout the past 20 years, the scope of the Directive has been gradually broadened to cover all industrial, agricultural and «sheryproducts.Directive98/48/ECextendedthesystemtoin-clude Information Society services since a need was felt for a mechanism for supervising this new and rapidly evolving «eld,while leaving economic operators and the Member States alike as much freedom as possible to prevent obstacles to technolog-ical developments in this sector.
Direktiivillê 98/48/EY jêrjestelmê ulotettiin tie-toyhteiskunnan palveluihin, koska oli havaittu tarve saada valvontamekanismi têlle uudelle ja nopeasti kehittyvêlle alalle. Toisaalta niin taloudellisille toimijoille kuin jêsenvaltioillekin haluttiin jêttêê mahdollisimman suuri vapaus alan teknisen ke-hityksen esteiden ennalta ehkêisemiseksi.
In 2000 the European Union launched the Lisbon Strategy › an ambitious agenda for reform whose aim was to make the EU the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based econo-my in the world by 2010.
Euroopan unioni julkisti vuonna 2000 Lissabonin strategian › kunnianhimoisen uudistusohjelman, jonka tarkoituksena on tehdê EU:sta maailman kilpailukykyisin ja dynaamisin osaami-seen perustuva talous vuoteen 2010 mennessê.
At its half-way mark, in 2005, the Com-mission proposed a renewed approach to this strategy focus-ing on growth and jobs.
Strategian puolivêlissê vuonna 2005 komissio esitteli pêivitetyn lêhesty-mistavan strategiaan. Siinê keskitytêên kasvuun ja tyûllisyy-teen.
The Commission identi«edimprovingthe quality of European and national regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market as a key challenge in this respect.
Komissio mêêritteli têltê osin keskeiseksi haasteeksi eu-rooppalaisen ja kansallisen sêêntelyn laadun parantamisen sisêmarkkinoiden moitteettoman toiminnan varmistamiseksi.
Twenty years after its entry into force the N o - t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e ( D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C , c o d i « e d b y D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C ) has proved to be a fundamental internal market in-strument.
Menettely edistêê osaltaan lêheisyysperiaatteen soveltamista mahdollistamalla sekê kansallisen lainsêêdênnûn parantami-sen ettê sellaisten alojen tunnistamisen, joilla yhdenmukaista-minen on todella tarpeen.
This procedure contributes to the application of the subsidi-arity principle, both through enabling improvements to be made to national legislation and identifying areas where har-monisation is really necessary.
Nêin pêêtûkset voidaan tehdê kul-loinkin sopivimmalla tasolla ja hajauttaa pêêtûksenteko, mikê takaa poliittisten, kulttuuristen ja alueellisten perinteiden mo-ninaisuuden sêilymisen.
Thus, the decision-making proc-ess can take place at the most appropriate level enabling de-centralisation which safeguards the diversity of political, cultural and regional traditions.
Direktiivi on antanut tietoa kansallisis-ta sêêntelyaloitteista ja johtanut aidon keskustelufoorumin syntymiseen, mikê mahdollistaa yhteisen toiminnan sisêmark-kinoiden lujittamiseksi.
The Directive has provided an insight into national regulatory initiatives, has led to the crea-tion of a genuine discussion forum, clearing the way for joint action to strengthen the internal market and has recently con-tributed to the establishment of the enlarged internal market of 25 Member States.
Se on hiljattain auttanut myûs 25 jêsen-valtion laajentuneiden sisêmarkkinoiden syntymistê.
The mechanism set up by the original Directive 83/189/EEC is based on the agreement of the Member States to inform and consult each other and the Commission before they adopt technical regulations and to modify their drafts if necessary.
Alkuperêisessê direktiivissê 83/189/ETY sêêdetty mekanismi perustuu jêsenvaltioiden sopimukseen tiedottaa toisilleen ja komissiolle aikeistaan ja neuvotella nêiden kanssa, ennen kuin ne antavat teknisiê mêêrêyksiê, ja muuttaa tarvittaessa mêêrê-ysehdotuksia.
By means of transparency and the exchange of information at the legislative proposal stage, the Member States have agreed to prevent the emergence of new obstacles to the single market.
Jêsenvaltiot ovat sopineet ehkêisevênsê uusien esteiden syntymisen sisêmarkkinoille avoimuuden ja tietojen-vaihdon avulla jo lainsêêdênnûn ehdotusvaiheessa.
Furthermore, this mechanism is a tool of better regulation since it allows the d i . e r e n t c o m p e t e n t a uijt h o r i t i e s , bo t h a t C o m mstu - n i t y and national levels, to prevent problems ex ante thus avoid-ing costly and controversial infringement proceedings which can only be launched ex post.
Lisêksi mekanismi on sêêntelyn parantamisen vêline, antaahan se yhtê lailla yhteisûn kuin jêsenvaltioidenkin kilpailuviran-omaisille mahdollisuudet ehkêistê ongelmat etukêteen. Nêin vêltetêên kalliit ja kiistoja aiheuttavat valvontamenettelyt, jot-ka voidaan kêynnistêê vasta jêlkikêteen.
The exchange and gathering of information is also an e.ectivewayofensuringthatnationalbest practices become known and are used as a model for oth-er regulatory initiatives.
Tietojen vaihdon ja keruun avulla varmistetaan niin ikêên tehokkaasti, ettê parhaat kansalliset kêytênnût tulevat tutuiksi ja ettê niitê kêytetêên malleina muissa lainsêêdêntûaloitteissa.
A pre-adoption screening procedure for all draft technical regula-tions and standards relating to products was therefore established and gradually expanded.
Têtê varten on perustettu sêêdûsten antamista edeltêvê tarkas-telumenettely kaikkien tuotteita koskevien teknisten mêêrêys-ten ja standardien ehdotuksia varten.
Following a 2002 Commission Report which analysed barriers to the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establish-ment in the Internal Market, the Commission's services are work-ing on the possible extension of Directive 98/34 to cover services other than Information Society services.
Elinkeinoelêmê osallistuu komission ja jêsenvaltioiden ohella ilmoitusmenettelyyn. Sen lisêksi, ettê jêsenvaltioissa toimivat yritykset pystyvêt selvittêmêên omien maidensa lainsêêdên-tûê, niillê on mahdollisuus tutkia sellaisten valtioiden lainsêê-
Industry, as well as the Commission and the Member States, is involved in the noti«cationprocedure.Besidesbeingabletoexamine legislation in their own countries, enterprises in the Member States have the opportunity of examining legislation proposed by countries to which they export or wish to export or to which they provide or envisage to provide Information Society services.
dêntûehdotuksia, joihin ne vievêt tai haluavat viedê tuotteitaan tai joissa ne tarjoavat tai aikovat tarjota tietoyhteiskunnan pal-veluja. Têmên seurauksena ne pystyvêt mukauttamaan tuottei-taan tai palvelujaan uusia vaatimuksia vastaaviksi.
As a consequence, they can plan to adapt their products or services to the new requirements; they can also identify protectionist elements in the drafts and take ac-tion to have them eliminated.
Ne voivat tunnistaa myûs ehdotuksiin sisêltyvêt protektionistiset piirteet ja kêydê toimeen niiden karsimiseksi.
In order to use the system to full advantage, industry must therefore know how it works and how to access the noti«edtexts.
Jotta jêrjestelmêstê saadaan têysi hyûty kêyttêjille, elinkeinoelê-mên on tunnettava jêrjestelmên toiminta ja tiedettêvê, kuinka ilmoitetuista sêêdûksistê hankitaan tietoa.
This may be done by means of a visit to our public data-base at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ enterprise/tris.
Se onnistuu vieraile-malla julkisessa tietokannassamme osoitteessa http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris.
This booklet is one of a number of Commission initiatives de-signed to bring Community law closer to those who use it.
Têmê kirjanen on yksi komission monista aloitteista, joiden tar-koituksena on lêhentêê yhteisûn lainsêêdêntûê niihin, jotka lainsêêdêntûê hyûdyntêvêt.
My hope is that its publication will help to enhance the exchange of information, dialogue and cooperation which has constitut-ed a new community culture.
Toivon, ettê kirjasen julkaiseminen lisêê entisestêên tietojenvaihtoa, vuoropuhelua ja yhteistyûtê, joiden myûtê Euroopan unioniin on syntynyt uusi yhteisûkult-tuuri.
Sabine Lecrenier Head of Unit Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry
Sabine L e c r e n i e r Y k s i k û n p ê ê l l i k k û Y r i t y s - ja teollisuustoiminnan pêêosasto
Introduction: Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market
Johdanto: Direktiivi 98/34/ey, sisêmarkkinoiden avoimuutta edistêvê vêline
At the beginning of the 1980s the Commission, basing itself on a Court of Justice ruling known as the `Cassis de Dijon' judg-ment, launched a new policy designed to complete the inter-nal market on the basis of three concepts:
Tietojen vaihto tapahtuu kaksivaiheisessa menettelyssê, koska direktiivi jakautuu kahteen erilliseen mutta toisiaan têydentê-vêên osaan.
The «rstpartrelatestotheprocedurefortheprovisionofinfor-mation on new national initiatives which should lead to the formulation of national standards between the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies, name-ly CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation) and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and the European Commission.
•Cassis de Dijon• -nimellê kutsutun Euroopan yhteisûjen tuo-mioistuimen ratkaisun perusteella komissio esitteli 1980-luvun alussa uuden politiikan, jonka tarkoituksena on toteuttaa sisê-markkinat tukeutuen kolmeen kêsitteeseen:
The Commission has given the European standardisation bodies responsibility for implement-ing this procedure, by means of an annual contract.
› jokainen jêsenvaltio hyvêksyy yhteisûn muissa jêsenvaltiois-sa laillisesti valmistetut tuotteet (•vastavuoroinen tunnusta-minen•)
› Acceptance in each Member State of products lawfully man-ufactured in the rest of the Community (`mutual recogni-tion');
Komis-sio on luovuttanut têmên menettelyn toteuttamisvastuun eu-rooppalaisille standardointielimille vuotuisella sopimuksella.
› Harmonisation limited to important economic sectors cover-ing, in particular, health, safety and the environment;
› sêêntely yhdenmukaistetaan rajoittuen têrkeisiin talouden sektoreihin, erityisesti terveys-, turvallisuus- ja ympêristû-alaan
The second part of the Directive is addressed to the Member States who have agreed to take part in a reciprocal transpar-ency and monitoring system in the regulatory «eld.Thisinitia-tive was original in several ways:
Direktiivin toinen osa on osoitettu jêsenvaltioille, jotka ovat so-pineet osallistuvansa sêêntelyn vastavuoroista avoimuutta ja seurantaa koskevaan jêrjestelmêên. Aloite oli monella tapaa erikoislaatuinen:
› A prevention-based approach to monitoring national regu-lations.
› omaksutaan ennalta ehkêisyyn perustuva lêhestymistapa kansallisen sêêntelyn seurantaan.
› The system is of a preventive nature: information is provided when technical regulations relating to products or rules on Information Society services are still at the draft stage, and may be amended in order to conform with the principles of the internal market.
› Jêrjestelmê on luonteeltaan ennalta ehkêisevê: tiedot anne-taan, kun tuotteita koskevat tekniset mêêrêykset tai tietoyhteis-kunnan palveluja koskevat mêêrêykset ovat vielê ehdotusvai-heessa ja muutettavissa sisêmarkkinoiden periaatteiden mukaisiksi.
Since 1984, Directive 83/189/EEC which, following codi«ca-tion later became Directive 98/34/EC, has laid down a preven-tive mechanism, the scope of which has been progressively extended.
Vuodesta 1984 lêhtien direktiivissê 83/189/ETY , josta tuli myû-hemmin tapahtuneen kodi«oinninjêlkeendirektiivi98/34/EY, on sêêdetty ennalta ehkêisevêstê mekanismista ja laajennettu asteittain sen soveltamisalaa.
Today, the Member States of the European Union are obliged to notify to the Commission and to the other Member States any draft technical regulation concerning products and Infor-mation Society services before they are adopted in national law.
Nykyisin Euroopan unionin jêsenvaltiot ovat velvollisia ilmoit-tamaan komissiolle ja muille jêsenvaltioille kaikki tuotteita ja tietoyhteiskunnan palveluja koskevien teknisten sêêdûsten eh-dotukset ennen niiden saattamista voimaan kansallisessa lain-sêêdênnûssê.
The concept was revolutionary at the time and has remained so - to the extent that the Commission is examining whether it could be extended to other areas.
Jêsenvaltiot ovat tunnus-taneet menettelyn edut, sillê têllê tavoin ne voivat vaikuttaa toistensa lainsêêdêntûprosesseihin.
› It is not only the Commission which can examine and mon-itor the texts through the operation of standstill periods, but also all the Member States; the latter have acknowl-edged the advantages of a procedure which allows for re-ciprocal i n ‹ u e n c e o v e r t h e i r l effg i s l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s .
› Lisêksi jêrjestelmê sallii kansallisten lainsêêdêntûehdotusten jêêdyttêmisen mêêrêtyksi ajaksi, jotta niiden aiheesta voi-
T h e T r e a - t y itself merely made provision for retrospective monitoring by the Member States, through the use of the more cum-bersome infringement procedures which are rarely applied between Member States.
Ajatus oli aikoinaan mullistava, ja sellainen se on edelleenkin › jopa siinê mêêrin, ettê komissio selvittêê parhaillaan, voidaan-ko sitê laajentaa muille aloille.
Directive of 28 March 1983. OJ L 109, 26.4.1983, p.
Direktiivi 83/189/ETY, annettu 28 pêivênê maaliskuuta 1983 (EYVL L 109, 26.4.1983, s.
8.Directive of 22 June 1998. OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.
8).Direktiivi 98/34/EY, annettu 22 pêivênê kesêkuuta 1998 (EYVL L 204, 21.7.1998, s. 37).
Moreover, by means of this legislative observa-tory, the real needs for harmonisation can be identi«edmore easily.
Têllaisen lainsêêdêntûvalvonnan avulla voidaan tunnistaa helposti myûs todelliset yhdenmukaistamistar-peet.
The application of the noti«cationprocedurehasgivenrisetonew practices. An entire philosophy of information exchange, dialogue and cooperation has evolved between the Member States.
donvaihdon, vuoropuhelun ja yhteistyûn «loso«a.Mekanismion samalla osoittautunut oivaksi benchmarking-analyysin tyû-kaluksi, jonka avulla jêsenvaltiot voivat hyûdyntêê kumppanei-densa oivalluksia teknisiin mêêrêyksiin liittyvien yhteisten on-gelmien ratkaisemiseksi.
This mechanism has also proved to be a formidable benchmarking tool which allows Member States to draw on the ideas of their partners in order to solve common problems regarding technical regulations, especially in newly regulated sectors such as GMOs, domain names and gene therapy.
Têmê koskee erityisesti hiljattain sêênneltyjê aloja, kuten muuntogeenisiê organismeja, Interne-tin verkkotunnuksia ja geenihoitoa.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
Komissio kêyttêê direktiiviê 98/34/EY myûs koulutusvêlineenê jêsenvaltioiden lainsêêdêntûtyylien hiomisessa.
Through this instrument, the Commission not only succeeds in removing provisions which are contrary to Community law, but also contributes to the formulation of provisions to be written into national legislation to ensure that economic operators are fully informed of their rights and permit application in practice of the principle of `mutual recognition' contained in the Euro-pean Court of Justice (ECJ) interpretation of Articles 28 et seq. of the Treaty.
Alussa jêhmeêsti kêynnistynyt jêrjestelmê on pêêssyt nyt vauh-tiin ja antanut komissiolle, jêsenvaltioille ja yrityksille mahdolli-suuden tarkastella kansallisten viranomaisten ja standardoin-tielinten toimintaa tekniikan alalla (tuotteiden koostumusta, merkintûjê, nimiê, testausta jne. koskevat sêênnût sekê tuotteen elinkaarta koskevat sêênnût aina hêvittêmiseen asti).
The system, which got o.toaslowstart,hasgainedmomen-tum and has provided the Commission, the Member States and enterprises with a window on the activities of national authori-ties and standardisation bodies in the technical «eld(rulesre-lating to product composition, labelling, name, testing, etc., as well as rules relating to product life cycle through to disposal).
Direktiivin soveltamisalaa on laajennettu vêhitellen, joten se kattaa nyt kaikki maataloustuotteet ja kaikki teollisesti valmistetut tuotteet ja koskee yhê useampia sêênnûksiê ja mêêrêyksiê.
The scope of the Directive has been progressively extended, so that it now covers all agricultural and industrially manufactured products and takes account of an ever growing number of pro-visions, in particular to prevent any measures which indirectly require compliance with technical speci«cationsfromslippingthrough the net.
Erityisenê tar-koituksena on estêê sellaiset toimenpiteet, joissa edellytetêên epêsuorasti tiettyjen teknisten eritelmien têyttêmistê.
In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
Vuonna 1998 menettelyê laajennettiin direktiivillê 98/48/EY kattamaan tietoyhteiskunnan palveluja koskevat sêênnût.
According to this principle, each Member State must accept the sale in its territory of any product lawfully manufactured or marketed in another Member State, subject, where legitimate interests, such as health and safety questions are at stake, to these products guaranteeing an equivalent level of protection. The corollary to this acceptance of products from the rest of
Vêlineen avulla komissio pystyy karsimaan yhteisûn lainsêê-dênnûn vastaiset sêênnûkset ja edistêmêên sellaisten sêênnûs-ten kirjaamista jêsenvaltioiden tulevaan lainsêêdêntûûn, joilla varmistetaan, ettê taloudelliset toimijat ovat têysin perillê oi-keuksistaan ja ettê jêsenvaltioissa sovelletaan kêytênnûssê •vastavuoroisen tunnustamisen• periaatetta, joka sisêltyy Eu-roopan yhteisûjen tuomioistuimen tulkintaan perustamissopi-muksen 28 artiklasta ja sitê seuraavista artikloista.
The geographical scope of the Directive was also gradually ex-tended.
Myûs direktiivin maantieteellinen soveltamisala on asteittain laajentunut.
Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
Direktiiviê 98/34/EY, joka saatettiin osin voimaan EFTA-maissa jo vuoden 1990 jêlkeen , laajennettiin osittain koskemaan Turkkia kyseisen valtion kanssa tehdyssê assosiaa-tiosopimuksessa .
The Directive has also provided a model for a Convention of the Council of Europe.
Direktiivi on myûs toiminut mallina erêêlle Euroopan neuvoston yleissopimukselle.
Directive 83/189/EEC was amended principally by Council Directive 88/182/EEC of 22 March 1988 (OJ L 81, 26.3.1988, p.
Direktiivin 83/189/ETY têrkeimmêt muutokset ovat seuraavat: neuvoston direktiivi 88/182/ETY, annettu 22 pêivênê maaliskuuta 1988 (EYVL L 81, 26.3.1988, p.
75) and by European Parliament and Council Directive 94/10/EC of 23 March 1994 (OJ L 100, 19.4.1994, p. 30).
75) ja Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivin 94/10/EY, annettu 23 pêivênê maaliskuuta 1994 (EYVL L 100, 19.4.1994, s. 30).
Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 c o d i « e d D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C a n d a l l i t s s u bse q u e n t a mffe n d - mffe n t s while Directive 98/48/EC of 20 July 1998 amended Directive 98/34/EC.
Kesêkuun 22 pêivênê 1998 annetulla direktiivillê 98/34/EY kodi«oitiindirektiivi83/189/ETYjakaikkisenmyûhemmêtmuutokset,ja20pêivênêheinêkuuta1998annetulladirektiivillê98/48/EY muutettiin direktiiviê 98/34/EY.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
EFTA-maiden ja ETY:n vêlinen sopimus tiedonantomenettelystê teknisten mêêrêysten alalla tuli voimaan marraskuussa 1990.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
Euroopan talousalueesta tehtyyn sopimukseen, jota on sovellettu 1. tammikuuta 1994 alkaen, sisêllytettiin sittemmin direktiivi 83/189/ETY tarvittavin muutoksin.
Switzerland, though not a signatory to this Agreement, continues to apply the procedure for the exchange of in-formation.
Vaikka Sveitsi ei olekaan osal-lisena têssê sopimuksessa, se jatkaa tietojenvaihtoa koskevan menettelyn soveltamista.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ C Vol. 16 No C 113, 24.12.1973) and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the «nalphaseofthecustomsunion(OJL35,13.2.1996,p.1).
Euroopan talousyhteisûn ja Turkin vêlinen assosiointisopimus (EYVL 217, 29.12.1964) ja EY›Turkki-assosiaationeuvoston pêêtûs N:o 1/95, tehty 22 pêivênê joulukuuta 1995, tulliliiton viimeisen vaiheen aloittamisesta (EYVL L 35, 13.2.1996, s. 1).
Convention No 180 of the Council of Europe on Information and Legal Co-operation concerning `Information Society Services'.
Euroopan neuvoston yleissopimus nro 180 tietoyhteiskunnan palvelujen alalla tapahtuvasta tiedonvaihdosta ja oikeudellisesta yhteistyûstê.
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
Tullakseen têmên oikeuskêytênnûn mukaiseksi hyvêksytyksi poikkeukseksi sisêmarkkinoiden perusvapauksista alalla, jota ei ole yhdenmukaistettu, kansallisen rajoituksen on noudatet-tava syrjimêttûmyyden, tarpeellisuuden ja suhteellisuuden periaatteita.
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
puolina olevista EFTA-maista perêisin oleviin tuotteisiin › on tuotteiden suunnittelua, valmistusta ja testausta koskevien mêêrêysten sekê kêytettyjen vaatimustenmukaisuuden arvi-ointimenettelyjen keskinêinen tunnustaminen. Jêsenvaltioille ja komissiolle ilmoitetaan nêistê mêêrêyksistê direktiivillê 98/34/EY perustetun tietojen ilmoittamismenettelyn avulla.
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Palvelujen tarjoamisen vapauden osalta têmê tarkoittaa sitê, ettê rajoitus on ilmeisen kohtuuton eikê siten yhteisûoikeuden kannalta hyvêksyttêvissê silloin, kun toimitus suoritetaan, ku-ten tietoyhteiskunnan palvelujen tapauksessa, ilman tarjoajan lêsnêoloa sen jêsenvaltion alueella, jossa suoritus vastaanote-taan ja kun kansallisessa sêêdûksessê ei oteta huomioon toi-mijan siinê jêsenvaltiossa, johon hên on sijoittautunut ja josta kêsin hên tarjoaa palvelujaan , jo têyttêmiê vaatimuksia.
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
Lisêksi tulliliiton viimeisen vaiheen aloittamisesta 22 pêivênê joulukuuta 1995 tehdyn EY›Turkki-assosiaationeuvoston pêê-tûksen N:o 1/95 mêêrêyksiê, jotka koskevat mêêrêllisten rajoi-tusten ja vaikutukseltaan vastaavien toimenpiteiden poista-mista EU:n ja Turkin kesken, tulkitaan niiden têytêntûûn panemiseksi ja soveltamiseksi tulliliittoon kuuluviin tuotteisiin Euroopan yhteisûjen tuomioistuimen EY:n perustamissopimus-ta ja erityisesti sen 28›30 artiklaa koskevien asiaan liittyvien pêêtûsten mukaisesti.