natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The work of ETSI is « n a n c e d i n p a r t b y t h e E C a n d E FT A i n t h e c o n t e x t of mandated work for the preparation of standards in support of Community policies.
Nêillê laitoksilla on tukenaan yleensê hajautetut elimet, jotka var-mistavat tarvittavan yksimielisyyden taloudellisten toimijoiden ja tyûmarkkinaosapuolten kesken.
Other resources come from the subscriptions of members of ETSI, contributions from the national telecommunications authorities, and a small amount from the sale of standards.
Muita esimerkkejê ovat logistista tukea tarjoavat elimet, jotka auttavat saavuttamaan asiasta yksimielisyyden ylei-sen kuulemisjêrjestelmên avulla, sekê elimet, jotka julkaisevat ja myyvêt hyvêksyttyjê standardeja.
ETSI's primary focus for its stand-ards is Europe, naturally, but with a truly international mem-bership (even most of its European members are global play-ers), the Institute seeks to develop standards for world-wide application.
Kaikki kansalliset standardointielimet ovat jêseninê eurooppa-laisissa standardointielimissê eli CENissê tai CENELECissê, yleensê myûs ISOssa tai IEC:ssê.
It was in this context that an agreement was concluded on the division of tasks for standardisation of electrical vehicles: CENELEC was given responsibility for preparing standards for vehicles connected to the electricity network, whilst CEN is re-sponsible for standards for vehicles independent of the net-work.
Têllaisessa yhteydessê tehtiin esimerkiksi sopimus sêhkûajoneu-vojen standardointitehtêvien jakamisesta. CENELECille annettiin vastuu sêhkûverkkoon kytkettyjen ajoneuvojen standardien val-mistelusta, ja CEN vastaa verkosta riippumattomien ajoneuvojen standardeista.
Furthermore, the co-operation between CENELEC and ETSI is based on a set of guidelines designed to resolve the dif-«cultiesinherentintheoverlappingofresponsibilitiesandavoid duplication offfe . o r t .
CENELECin ja ETSIn vêlinen yhteistyû perustuu niin ikêên yleisohjeisiin, joiden tarkoituksena on ratkaista pêêllekkêi-sistê vastuualueista johtuvat ongelmat ja estêê pêêllekkêinen tyû.
T h e a d op t i o n o ft h e C E N E L E C / E T S I s t a n d a r d s programme for the development of harmonised standards guaranteeing electromagnetic compatibility in the «eldoftelecommunicationsisanotherexampleofthekindofco-operation which must be extended, since the standards programmes will increasingly call for the participation of two or even three European standardisation bodies.
CENELEC-/ETSI-standardointiohjelman hyvêksyminen telealan sêhkûmagneettisen yhteensopivuuden takaavien yhdenmukais-ten standardien kehittêmiseksi on toinen esimerkki têllaisesta yh-teistyûstê, jota on laajennettava. Standardointiohjelmat edellyttê-vêt entistê useammin kahden tai kolmenkin eurooppalaisen standardointielimen osallistumista.
10) `national standardisation body': a body referred to in Annex II;
10) •kansallisella standardointielimellê• liitteessê II mainittua toi-mielintê;
Although they are precisely d e « n e d , t h e fu n c t i o n s o f C E N , C E N E L E C and ETSI inevitably overlap in a number of «elds,suchas the machinery sector or the sector of information and com-munications technology (ICT), which is situated at the cross-roads between information technology, electronic compo-nents and telecommunications networks.
Direktiivin liitteessê II mainitut kansalliset standardointielimet ovat eri jêsenvaltioiden laitoksia, jotka ovat vastuussa standar-
Co-ordination of the work of these three bodies is therefore essential.
Elimen ja valtion vêlisen suhteen oikeudellinen muoto, joka on voitu
This is mainly done through the ICT Standards Board, which is open to economic operators.
Kansallisten standardointielimen yhteystiedot on mainittu têmên kirjasen liitteessê 2.
The national standardisation bodies referred to in Annex II to the Directive are the institutions in the various Member States which are responsible for preparing and publishing standards, in accordance with a procedure which allows all economic and
Huomattakoon, ettê Yhdysvalloissa ja Kanadassa standardien julkaisu on useiden satojen alakohtaisten asiantuntijaorganisaatioiden vastuulla.
social operators concerned to take part in the work on a volun-tary basis. Their tasks are therefore of general interest.
virallistaa sopimuksellisesti (kuten Saksassa tai Yhdistynees-sê kuningaskunnassa) tai mêêrêyksin (kuten Ranskassa, Itali-assa tai Espanjassa), kuvaa têtê riippuvuutta;
France, Italy or Spain), is an indicator of this degree of de-pendence;
Â tyûn rahoituslêhteiden keskinêinen rahoitusosuus: teollisuu-den vapaaehtoiset maksut, standardien ja lisêpalvelujen (esim. serti«ointi)myynti,valtiontuet;
These bodies are, with one or two exceptions, very similar in terms of their constitution, their organs and their operating methods.
Kyseessê on toisaalta tekniset eritelmêt tai muut vaatimukset tai palveluja koskevat mêêrêykset (katso edellê olevat mêêritel-mêt), jotka jêsenvaltiot vahvistavat ja joita on sovellettava teol-lisuus- ja maataloustuotteisiin sekê tietoyhteiskunnan palvelui-hin.
› the respective share of the various sources from which the work is «nanced:voluntarycontributionsfromindustry,thesale of standards and additional services (for example, certi-«cation),Statesubsidies;
Toisena ryhmênê ovat tietytjêsenvaltioiden lait, asetukset ja hallinnolliset mêêrêykset, joilla kielletêên joukko tarkemmin mêêriteltyjê toimintoja.
They are, in most cases, centralised bodies in the form of as-sociations supported by the public authorities, which use the national standards as reference documents in speci«cationsforthe award of public contracts or for the preparation of national technical regulations.
Jotta tekninen eritelmê, •muu vaatimus• tai palveluja koskeva mêêrêys katsotaan •tekniseksi mêêrêykseksi•, sen on têytettêvê seuraavat edellytykset:
› the degree of centralisation of the organs responsible for preparing draft standards, which varies according to wheth-er these organs are linked to trade associations (as in France or in Germany), or form part of the national institution (as in the United Kingdom);
Â standardiehdotusten laadinnasta vastaavien elinten keskit-tyneisyyden aste, joka vaihtelee sen mukaan, ovatko elimet sidoksissa ammattialajêrjestûihin (kuten Ranskassa tai Sak-sassa) vai ovatko ne osa kansallista viranomaista (kuten Yh-distyneessê kuningaskunnassa);
› the degree of involvement of the national standardisation body in the organisation of the technical work of CEN or CENELEC;
Â kansallisen standardointielimen osallistumisaste CENin tai CENELECin teknisen tyûn jêrjestelyyn;
› the size of the body.
Â elimen suuruusluokka.
These institutes have the support of bodies which are normally decentralised and ensure the necessary consensus between the economic and social partners, namely sectoral technical committees composed of unpaid experts provided mainly by industry to prepare standards on subjects in the work pro-gramme; bodies providing logistical support and bringing about a consensus through a system of public enquiry; and bodies which publish and sell the standards adopted.
Â sen noudattamisen on oltava •pakollista• (eli oikeudellisesti tai tosiasiallisesti velvoittavaa, katso jêljempênê). Têmê piir-re, joka on têmên direktiivin soveltamisalaan kuuluvien, vi-ranomaisten laatimien asiakirjojen luontainen ominaisuus, on teknisen mêêrêyksen ja standardin oleellinen ero.
The national standardisation bodies are all members of the Eu-ropean standardisation bodies, whether CEN or CENELEC, and generally also of ISO or the IEC.
Standar-dien laatijoina ovat yksityiset elimet, ja niiden noudattami-nen on pohjimmiltaan vapaaehtoista;
This simpli«eddescriptionofthenationalstandardisationbod-ies does not cover di.erencesrelatingtofactorssuchas:
Â sen on vaikutettava teollisuus- tai maataloustuotteiden kau-pan pitoon tai kêyttûûn, palvelun tarjontaan tai palveluntar-joajan sijoittautumiseen jossain jêsenvaltiossa tai sen mer-kittêvêssê osassa.
11) `technical regulation', technical speci«cationsandotherre-quirements, or rules on services, including the relevant adminis-trative provisions, the observance of which is compulsory, de jure or de facto, in the case of marketing, provision of a service, estab-lishment of a service operator or use in a Member State or a major part thereof, as well as laws, regulations or administrative provi-sions of Member States, except those provided for in Article 10, prohibiting the manufacture, importation, marketing or use of a product or prohibiting the provision or use of a service, or estab-lishment as a service provider.
11) •teknisellê mêêrêyksellê• teknistê eritelmêê tai muuta vaati-musta taikka palveluja koskevaa mêêrêystê, mukaan lukien so-vellettavat hallinnolliset mêêrêykset, jonka noudattaminen on oikeudellisesti tai tosiasiallisesti pakollista ja joka koskee kaupan pitêmistê, palvelujen tarjoamista, palvelujen tarjoajien sijoittau-tumista tai kêyttûê jêsenvaltiossa tai suuressa osassa sen aluetta sekê jêsenvaltioiden lakeja, asetuksia ja hallinnollisia mêêrêyk-siê, joissa kielletêên tuotteen valmistus, tuonti, kaupan pitêminen tai kêyttû taikka joissa kielletêên palvelujen tarjoaminen, palvelu-jen kêyttû tai sijoittautuminen palvelujen tarjoajana, sanotun kuitenkaan rajoittamatta 10 artiklan sêênnûsten soveltamista.
In de«ningtheconceptof`technicalregulation',Paragraph11provides information regarding the type of texts which must
Eritelmêên, •muuhun vaatimukseen• tai palvelua koskevaan mêê-rêykseen sovellettavat hallinnolliset sêênnût voivat nekin olla di-rektiivissê tarkoitettuja teknisiê mêêrêyksiê.
The legal form of the relationship be-tween the body and the State, formalised contractually (as in Germany or the United Kingdom) or by regulations (as in
Tietyt tekniset eritelmêt, •muut vaatimukset• tai palveluja kos-kevat mêêrêykset, jotka têyttêvêt teknisten mêêrêysten mêêri-
A list of national standardisation contacts is given in annex 2 to this booklet. However, the formal list of national standardisation bodies is to be found in annex II of the directive.
Samalla kun 11 kohdassa mêêritellêên •teknisen mêêrêyksen• kêsite, siinê annetaan tietoa siitê, millaiset tekstit on annettava tiedoksi direktiivissê têllê alalla perustettavan tietojen ilmoitta-mismenettelyn mukaisesti.
In the United States and Canada, on the other hand, the publication of standards is the responsibility of several hundred specialist organisations, each in a speci«csector.
Kêsiteltêessê jêljempênê direktiivin 7 artiklan 2 kohtaa havaitaan, ettê joissain tapauksissa standardin noudattamisesta voi tulla pakollista, jolloin se saa •tekni-sen mêêrêyksen• oikeudellisen aseman.
Certain technical speci«cations,`otherrequirements'orrulesonservices which meet the de«nitionoftechnicalregulationsareexcluded from the scope of the Directive, particularly if they comply with binding Community acts or are limited to imple-menting a judgment of the European Court of Justice, as s p e c i - « e d i n A r t i c l e 1 0 o ft h e D i r e c t i v e .
telmên, eivêt kuulu direktiivin soveltamisalaan. Nêin on erityi-sesti silloin, kun niillê noudatetaan yhteisûn sitovia sêêdûksiê tai ainoastaan pannaan têytêntûûn Euroopan yhteisûjen tuo-mioistuimen pêêtûs, kuten direktiivin 10 artiklassa sêêdetêên.
On the one hand there are the technical speci«cationsorotherrequirements or rules on services (see the above de«nitions),which are laid down by the Member States and which are ap-plicable to industrial and agricultural products and to Informa-tion Society services, and on the other there are the laws, regu-lations and administrative provisions of the Member States which prohibit certain speci«edactivities.
lyohjeita, joissa itsessêên viitataan teknisiin eritelmiin tai muihin vaatimuksiin taikka palveluja koskeviin mêêrêyksiin, ja joiden noudattaminen antaa edellyttêê nêissê laeissa, asetuksissa ja hallinnollisissa mêêrêyksissê vahvistettujen vaatimusten mukai-suutta,
The `compulsory' nature of a technical speci«cation,an`otherrequirement' or a rule on services may be conferred upon them in two ways:
Teknisen eritelmên, •muun vaatimuksen• tai palveluja koske-van mêêrêyksen •pakollisuus• voi syntyê kahdella tapaa:
In order to qualify as a technical regulation, a technical speci«-cation, an `other requirement' or a rule on services must ful«lthe following conditions:
1. oikeudellisesti, kun sen noudattaminen on sêêdetty pakolli-seksi suoraan asiaan kuuluvan viranomaisen antamalla tai aiheuttamalla toimenpiteellê.
› it must be `compulsory' (i.e. `de jure' or `de facto' binding, see hereinafter). This characteristic, which is inherent in the doc-uments prepared by the public authorities, to which this Di-rective applies, constitutes the major di.erencebetweenatechnical regulation and a standard, which is prepared by pri-vate bodies and is in essence voluntary;
Têssê tarkoitetut lait, asetukset tai hallinnolliset mêêrêykset ovat kansallisten viranomaisten toimia, joissa viitataan tekni-siin eritelmiin tai •muihin vaatimuksiin• tai palveluja koske-viin mêêrêyksiin, joiden antajana on yleensê muu elin kuin val-tio (esimerkiksi kansallinen standardointielin) ja jotka eivêt sinêllêên ole pakollisia (standardit, ammatilliset sêênnût tai kêytênnesêênnût) mutta joiden noudattamiseen kehotetaan, koska têllê tavoin tuote tai palvelu oletetaan edellê mainittujen toimenpiteiden vaatimukset têyttêvêksi (vaatimustenmukai-suusolettama).
By way of example, the conditions regarding the small-scale production of jam and preserved fruit, laid down by decree, will be considered to be a technical regulation which is man-datory de jure.
Esimerkiksi hillon ja hedelmêsêilykkeiden pienimuotoista tuo-tantoa koskevat ehdot, joista sêêdetêên asetuksella, katsotaan oikeudellisesti pakolliseksi tekniseksi mêêrêykseksi.
The same will apply to a ban on using plastic bottles for the marketing of mineral water, as laid down by ordinance, etc.
Sama kos-kee muovipullojen kêytûn kieltoa kivennêisveden markkinoin-nissa, jos se perustuu mêêrêykseen tms.
› it must in‹uencethemarketingoruseofindustrialandagri-cultural products, the provision of a service or the establish-ment of a service operator, in a Member State or a signi«cantpart of that State.
Nêin on erityisesti silloin, kun esimerkiksi vakuutuksia koskeva laki vapauttaa tietyt, muut kuin pakolliset standardit têyttêvien tuotteiden kêyttêjêt velvoitteesta osoittaa pakollisten vaati-musten têyttyminen sillê perusteella, ettê kyseisiin tuotteisiin sovelletaan vaatimustenmukaisuusolettamaa.
2. de facto, where the technical specification is not laid down by a formal and binding act of the State concerned, but where the State encourages its observance.
2. tosiasiallisesti, jollei teknistê eritelmêê ole vahvistettu kysei-sen valtion virallisella ja velvoittavalla sêêdûksellê mutta val-tio kehottaa noudattamaan sitê.
As a result of the similar effects which they may have upon trade, these measures are considered equivalent to binding regula-tions.
Koska têllaisilla toimilla voi olla samanlainen vaikutus kauppaan, ne katsotaan velvoitta-vien mêêrêysten vertaisiksi.
Paragraph 11 gives three examples of the most important and the most frequent de facto technical regulations, in or-der to clarify a concept which was not de«nedintheinitialversion of the Directive and gave rise to di.erentinterpreta-tions that were prejudicial to the correct implementation of the information procedure.
Têssê 11 kohdassa annetaan kolme esimerkkiê merkittêvim-mistê ja yleisimmistê tosiasiallisista teknisistê mêêrêyksistê, koska têtê kêsitettê ei ollut mêêritelty direktiivin alkuperêisessê versiossa ja se on aiheuttanut erilaisia tulkintoja, jotka ovat hai-tanneet ilmoitusmenettelyn oikeaa têytêntûûnpanoa.
The administrative provisions applicable to a speci«cation,toan `other requirement' or to a rule on services can also consti-tute technical regulations within the meaning of the Direc-tive.
› jêsenvaltion lait, asetukset ja hallinnolliset mêêrêykset, jotka koskevat joko teknisiê eritelmiê tai muita vaatimuksia taikka pal-veluja koskevia mêêrêyksiê tai ammatillisia sêêntûjê tai menette-
These measures, as with all technical regulations, must be n o t i « e d u n d e r t h e D i r e c t i v e w h e n t h e y e m a n a t e f r o m t h e c e n t r a l governments of the Member States or from one of their authorities as s p e c i « e d i n t h e l i s t d r a w n up b y t h e C o m - m i s s i o n in the framework of the Standing Committee of the Directive.
Taloudellisten toimijoiden keskenêên tekemêt sopimukset, joilla mêêritellêên tekniset eritelmêt tai muut vaatimukset tie-tyille tuotteille tai palveluja koskevat mêêrêykset, eivêt ole sel-laisinaan velvoittavia, koska ne ovat lêhtûisin yksityiseltê sekto-rilta.
We shall see later, under Article 7(2) of the Directive that, in certain cases, compliance with the standard may become mandatory, so that it then acquires the status of a `technical regulation'.
Edellê selvitetyssê direktiivin 1 artiklan 3 ja 4 kohdan merkityksessê.
De facto technical regulations include: ing to their origin in the private sector. They are nevertheless considered to be de facto technical regulations when the State is a signatory party to one of these agreements.
suojaamiseksi, koska niiden pêêtarkoituksena on vaikuttaa vii-meksi mainittujen kêyttêytymiseen suhteessa tiettyyn tuottee-seen tai palveluun.
This circumstance is becoming increasingly frequent, since such agreements have become instruments of national regu-latory policy.
Têmê tilanne yleistyy koko ajan, koska têllaisista sopimuksista on tullut kansallisen sêêntelypolitiikan vêlineitê.
They are often used by some Member States in sectors such as the automobile industry, chemical industry and oil industry, in most cases for environmental reasons. For example to reduce pollutant vehicle emissions, the discharge of harmful substances into water, or the use of certain types of packaging, etc.
Osa jêsenvalti-oista kêyttêê niitê usein autoteollisuuden, kemian teollisuuden ja ûljyteollisuuden kaltaisilla aloilla, pêêasiassa ympêristûsyistê, esimerkiksi saastuttavien ajoneuvopêêstûjen, vahingollisten aineiden vesistûpêêstûjen tai tietynlaisten pakkausten kêytûn vêhentêmiseksi.
In the « e l d o f I n f o r m a t i o n S o c i e t y s e r v i c e s , a n o t i « e d t e x t - a d r a ft C o d e o f P r a c t i c e o n v o l u n t a r y r e t e n t i o n o f communication data- provides a good example of such voluntary agreement.
Tietoyhteiskunnan palvelujen alalla yksi ilmoi-tettu teksti › luonnos kêytênnesêênnûiksi viestintêtietojen va-paaehtoisesta sêilyttêmisestê › on oiva esimerkki vapaaehtoi-sesta sopimuksesta.
The laws, regulations or administrative provisions referred to are measures adopted by the national authorities which refer to technical speci«cationsor`otherrequirements' or to rules on servicesusually laid down by bodies other than the State (by a national standardisation body, for example), which are not compulsory as such (standards, professional codes or codes of practice), but observance of which is encouraged since it confers on the product or the service a presumption of con-formity with the provisions of the aforementioned measures.
Têmê sêênnûs on otettu direktiiviin, koska muutamissa tapauk-sissa •puhtaille ajoneuvoille• myûnnettiin verohoukuttimia, jos ne têyttivêt tietyt pêêstûrajat tai ne oli varustettu katalysaatto-rein.
These agreements allow greater ‹exibilityinimplementingthemeasures necessary to attain the objectives of the legislation, and the voluntary participation of the industry involved en-sures that they will be achieved.
Kokemus on osoittanut, ettê jêsenvaltiot monesti liittêvên houkuttimiin ehtoja, jolloin kêyttûûn otettava jêrjestelmê muuttuu yhteisûn lainsêêdênnûn vastaiseksi. On selvêê, ettê têllaiset ehdotukset on aihetta tutkia.
Such is the case, in particular, if a law relating to insurance re-leases the users of products complying with certain non-man-datory standards from the responsibility of proving conformity with mandatory requirements, since these products bene«tfrom a presumption of conformity with the requirements.
Nêmê sopimukset lisêêvêt joustavuutta lainsêêdênnûn tavoit-teiden saavuttamisen kannalta vêlttêmêttûmien toimenpitei-den toteuttamisessa, ja asiaan liittyvên toimialan vapaaehtoi-nen osallistuminen takaa, ettê tavoitteisiin pêêstêên.
The State must be involved in these agreements if they are to fall within the scope of Directive 98/34/EC.
Valtion on osallistuttava sopimuksiin, jotta ne kuuluvat direktii-vin 98/34/EY soveltamisalaan.
For the public au-thority to be able to ful«ltheinformationobligationincum-bent on it and take account of comments by the Commission or a Member State in the framework of the information proce-dure laid down by the Directive, the State must be a contract-ing party.
Jotta viranomainen pystyy têyt-têmêên sitê koskevan ilmoitusvelvoitteen ja ottamaan huomi-oon komission tai jêsenvaltioiden huomautukset direktiivissê sêêdetyn tietojen ilmoittamismenettelyn puitteissa, valtion on oltava osapuolena sopimuksessa.
› voluntary agreements to which a public authority is a con-tracting party and which provide, in the general interest, for compliance with technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsor rules on services, excluding public procurement tender speci«-cations.
› tekniset eritelmêt tai muut vaatimukset tai palveluja koskevat sêênnût, jotka liittyvêt verotus- tai rahoitustoimenpiteisiin, jotka vaikuttavat tuotteiden tai palveluiden kulutukseen rohkaisemalla nêiden teknisten eritelmien tai muiden vaatimusten taikka palve-luja koskevien mêêrêysten noudattamista; têmê ei koske kansal-lisiin sosiaaliturvajêrjestelmiin liittyviê palveluja koskevia teknisiê eritelmiê, muita vaatimuksia tai mêêrêyksiê.
Agreements entered into between economic operators which establish technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsforcer-tain products or rules on services are not binding as such ow-
Luokkaan sisêltyvêt myûs verotus- tai rahoitustoimenpiteet, jotka voivat vaikuttaa kulutukseen kannustamalla têyttêmêên direktiivissê tarkoitetut •muut vaatimukset• (esimerkiksi va-pauttamalla ympêristûverosta tiettyjen tuotteiden pakkaukset, jos niille perustetaan panttijêrjestelmê, tai tietyt tuotteet, jos niitê varten perustetaan kerêys- ja kierrêtysjêrjestelmê).
› technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsorrulesonserv-ices which are linked to «scalor«nancialmeasuresa.ectingtheconsumption of products or services by encouraging compliance with such technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsorruleson services; technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsorrules on services linked to national social security systems are not included.
Têssê kohdassa tarkoitettujen verotus- tai rahoitustoimenpitei-den vahvistajina ovat kansalliset viranomaiset, ja niiden tarkoi-tuksen on poikettava jêsenvaltioiden verolainsêêdênnûn pe-rinteisistê tarkoituksista.
In the meaning of Article 1(3) and (4) of the Directive, as explained above.
Vain teknisiin eritelmiin, •muihin vaatimuksiin• tai palveluja koske-
The «scalor«nancialmeasuresreferredtointhisparagrapharelaid down by the national public authorities for a purpose other than that traditionally pursued by the « s c a l l effg i s l a t i o n o ft h e Mffe mb e r States.
viin mêêrêyksiin liittyvêt seikat, jotka voivat aiheuttaa kaupan esteitê, tutkitaan.
Directive 98/34/EC does not cover the whole of the «scalor«-nancial legislation of the Member States; it only refers to tech-nical speci«cationsor`otherrequirements'orrulesonserviceslinked to «scalor«nancialmeasureswhichhavetheobjectiveof changing the behaviour of consumers or service recipients.
tamissopimuksen 30 tai 46 artiklan perusteella tai sillê, ettê ne ovat oikeasuhtaisia olennaisiin vaatimuksiin nêhden yhteisûjen tuomioistuimen oikeuskêytênnûn mukaisesti, ne ovat nimen-omaan tavaroiden ja palvelujen vapaan liikkuvuuden ja yhtei-sûûn sijoittautumisvapauden esteitê.