natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The notion of the shift of the burden of proof made its way into EU law through ECJ caselaw handed down in connection with equal pay cases – where a woman could show difference in gender and difference in pay, and the court needed the employer to provide anexplanation.
Têllûin naispuo-linen tyûntekijê pystyi osoittamaan sukupuolten vêlisen erilaisen kohtelun ja erilaisen palkan, ja tuomioistuin pyysi tyûnantajaa antamaan selityksen.
The most frequently cited case in this regard is Enderby v. Frenchay Health Authority and the Secretary of State for Health, C-127/92.
Useimmiten mainittu têtê aihetta kos-keva asia on Enderby vastaan Frenchay Health Authority and Secretary of State for Health, C-127/92.
There followed Council Directive 97/80/EC on the burden of proof in cases of discriminationbased on sex.
Nêiden jêlkeen annettiin neuvoston direktiivi 97/80/EY todistustaakasta sukupuoleen perustuvis-sa syrjintêtapauksissa.
The shift of the burden of proof has been closely linked to the importance ofdelivering effective judicial protection against acts of discrimination.
Todistustaakan siirtêminen on liittynyt lêheisesti syrjiviê toimia koskevan tehokkaan oikeussuojan antamisen têrkeyteen.
The shift of the burden of proof which the Directives allow is, however, not automatic.
Direktiiveissê sallittu todistustaakan siirtêminen ei kuitenkaan ole automaattinen.
The onus of proof doesnot shift as soon as a plaintiff simply claims that he was discriminated against but only afters/he establishes facts from which it maybe presumedthat discrimination has occurred.What these facts might be is dependent on domestic legislation and case law.
Todistamisvelvollisuus ei siirry, jos valituksen esittêjê vain vêittêê joutuneensa syrjinnên kohteeksi, vaan vasta sen jêlkeen, kun hên osoittaa ne tosiseikat, joiden perusteella voidaan olettaa syrjinnên tapahtuneen.
The Directives refer to discrimination ‘on grounds of’ racial or ethnic origin, religion orbelief, disability,sexual orientation and age.
Nêmê tosiseikat riippuvat kansallisesta lain-sêêdênnûstê ja oikeuskêytênnûstê.
Key concepts in the training rejected job-seekers to seek an immediate response from the employer as to the reasons fortheir rejection.
Direktiiveissê viitataan syrjintêên rodun tai etnisen alkuperên, uskonnon tai vakaumuksen, vam-maisuuden, sukupuolisen suuntautumisen ja iên •perusteella•.
Courts and tribunals in the United Kingdom can draw inferences of discrimination from the answers given to the questionnaire or from the failure of the employer torespond in time or respond at all.
Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan kal-taisten valtioiden oikeuskêytênnûssê ja kansallisessa lainsêêdênnûssê, johon direktiivit on saatettu osaksi, on yleensê selvennetty, ettê •perusteella• voi sisêltêê suojan syrjintêê vastaan, kun uhri têyttêê asianomaiset erityspiirteet tai kun hênellê katsotaan olevan têllaisia erityispiirteitê tai kun hênet yhdistetêên henkilûihin, joilla on têllaiset erityispiirteet.
Both the Race Directive (2000/43/EC) and the Employment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC)expressly mention in their preambles that statistics may be used in cases of indirect discrimination.
Nêin ollen valituksen esittêjê, joka ei ilmoita tuomioistuimessa kuuluvansa romanivêhemmistûûn, voi samaan aikaan vêittêê joutuneensa syrjinnên kohteeksi oletetun etnisen alkuperênsê vuoksi.
This is known as the principle of ‘directeffect’.
Syrjinnên uhrit voivat kêyttêê monia oikeudenkêyntivêlineitê mahdollisen syrjinnên toteen nêyt-têmiseksi.
The aggrieved individual will have to show that the provision relied on is a preciseand unconditional principle which is sufficiently operational to be applied by a nationalcourt and which is therefore capable of governing the legal position of individuals.
Têllaisia vêlineitê ovat testit, tilastojen kêyttû, video- ja êênitallenteet ja ns. kyselyloma-kemenettely.
However, it is generally held that the principle of direct effect applies only to complaints directedagainst a public body or ‘emanation of the State’.
Yhdysvalloissa kêytetêên yleisesti testausta vêlittûmên syrjinnên osoittamiseksi tyû-paikan, asunnon tai palvelujen saannissa.
As such, in relation to litigation between private individuals or entities, Directives also havethe so-called ‘indirect effect’.
Belgiassa testaus on laissa hyvêksytty todistuskappale.
As discussed above, States and in particular domestic courtsare obliged to do everything possible to achieve the results outlined in the Directives.
Keski- ja Itê-Euroopassa toimivat kansalaisjêrjestût kêyttêvêt myûs testaajia, esimerkiksi tyûnhaki-joita.
Indirect effect therefore requires domestic courts to interpret existing national law,as far aspossible, in line with the Directive that should have been implemented.
Nêmê valitaan siten, ettê heidên erityispiirteensê vastaavat tyûnhakijoiden kaikkia erityispiir-teitê, lukuun ottamatta yhtê erityispiirrettê (useimmiten rotu), jonka perusteella syrjintêê esiintyy.
It is ultimately for the ECJ to decide which terms of the anti-discrimination Directives havedirect or indirect effect.
Êêni- ja videotallenteita voidaan kêyttêê todisteena joissain valtioissa (esimerkiksi Tþekissê), mutta ei toisissa.
If a State fails to implement a Directive within the time frame provided, the State is liablefor damage that this causes to the individual.
Yhdistyneessê kuningaskunnassa hylêtyt tyûnhakijat voivat hakea kyselymenettelyn avulla vêlittûmêsti vastausta tyûnantajalta hylkêêmisensê perusteista.
This is referred to as Francovich damages asthe principles were first laid down in the case of Francovich and Bonifaci v. Italy (Joined Cases C-6/90 and C-9/90) decided by the European Court of Justice in 1991.
Yhdistyneen kuningaskun-nan tuomioistuimet voivat tehdê syrjintêê koskevia pêêtelmiê kyselylomakkeen vastauksista tai sen mukaisesti, onko tyûnantaja vastannut myûhêssê tai onko se vastannut ollenkaan.
In the Francovich case the ECJ listed three conditions which are both necessaryand suffi-cientto establish liability under this principle. These are:
Sekê rotudirektiivin (2000/43/EY) ettê ammattipuitedirektiivin (2000/78/EY) johdannoissa maini-taan nimenomaisesti, ettê tilastoja voidaan kêyttêê vêlillisissê syrjintêtapauksissa.
The Francovich damages remedy has been developed by the ECJ in later cases.
† Nêiden oikeuksien sisêltû on voitava yksilûidê kyseisen direktiivin sêênnûsten perusteella.
It is now clearthat it is available for all breaches of EU law by a Member State, including failure to implement a Directive properly,in addition to complete non-implementation.
Lisêksi EU:n lain rikkomisen on oltava myûs riittêvên vakava, jotta yksityinen oikeussubjekti on oikeutettu saamaan vahingonkorvauksia.
The text of the two Directives and possibly summaries (see ‘National Context’ Section).
Kummankin direktiivin sisêltû ja mahdolliset yhteenvedot (katso osa •Jêsenvaltioiden toimet•).
For the participants to have explored the roles NGOs can and should play in combatingdiscrimination
† Osallistujat tiedostavat, miten kansalaisjêrjestût voivat torjua syrjintêê ja millainen asema niillê têssê olisi oltava.
2.1.What is a NGO?
2.1 Mikê on kansalaisjêrjestû?
ANGO is a local, national, or international group, with a legally established constitution, aclear purpose and visible activities, with a governing body which has the authority to speakfor its members.
Kansalaisjêrjestû on paikallinen, kansallinen tai kansainvêlinen ryhmê, jolla on lainmukainen rakenne, selkeê tavoite ja nêkyvêt toimet ja jonka hallintoelimellê on valtuus puhua jêsentensê puolesta.
It is normally a non-profit organisation, not affiliated with any Government or private-sector entity, or any political party.
Se on yleensê yleishyûdyllinen jêrjestû, joka ei ole liittynyt mihinkêên hallitukseen tai yksityisen sektorin tahoon tai poliittiseen puolueeseen.
Its aims are usually to promote wellbeing by addressing social and legal problems, and by seeking to play an equal role withother democratic institutions in the development and progress of civil society.
Se pyrkii yleensê edistêmêên hyvinvointia kêsittelemêllê sosiaalisia ja oikeudellisia ongelmia sekê toimimaan tasavertaisesti muiden demo-kraattisten toimielinten kanssa kansalaisyhteiskunnan kehittêmiseksi.
2.2.What is the role of a NGO in the field of combating discrimination?
2.2 Mikê on kansalaisjêrjestûn asema syrjinnên torjunnassa?
When considering what role they can play in combating discrimination, NGOs should takefull advantage of the special role that has been given to them under Articles 7 and 12 of Council Directive 2000/43/EC, and Articles 9 and 14 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen olisi pyrittêvê torjumaan syrjintêê hyûdyntêmêllê têysimêêrêisesti niille neu-voston direktiivin 2000/43/EY 7 ja 12 artiklassa sekê neuvoston direktiivin 2000/78/EY 9 ja 14 artik-lassa myûnnettyê erityisasemaa.
In order for a country to achieve its goals of peace, democracy,good governance, health,prosperity and equality, NGOs are essential to successful development.
Kansalaisjêrjestûillê on olennainen asema, jotta valtio voi saavuttaa rauhaa, demokratiaa, hyvêê hallintotapaa, terveyttê, vaurautta ja tasa-arvoa koskevat tavoitteensa.
The role of NGOs as instruments of civil society in the fight against discrimination caninclude:
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen asema kansalaisyhteiskunnan vêlineinê syrjintêê vastaan voi sisêltêê seuraavia toimia:
Providing a means for expressing and actively addressing the needs of people who arediscriminated against
† syrjinnên uhrien tukeminen oikeussuojakeinojen saamisessa
Supporting victims of discrimination in their access to justice
† pêêtûksentekoon vaikuttavien mekanismien luominen
Promoting diversity and equality in society
† viranomaisten ja yritysten saaminen mukaan syrjinnên torjuntaan
Monitoring, documenting and denouncing discrimination
† syrjinnên seuranta, dokumentointi ja tuomitseminen
Maintaining equality on the political agenda and encouraging mobilisation
† tasa-arvon sêilyttêminen poliittisella asialistalla ja toiminnan rohkaiseminen.
Empower groups to engage in campaigns, to be self-advocates and to assert andenforce their rights;
† edesauttaa ryhmiê osallistumaan kampanjoihin ja puolustamaan sekê vahvistamaan ja sovelta-maan oikeuksiaan kêytênnûssê
Work, where appropriate, in partnership with Governmentsto achieve common aimsand objectives;
† tyûskennellê tarvittaessa yhteistyûssê hallitusten kanssa yhteisten pêêmêêrien ja tavoitteiden saavuttamiseksi
Work, where appropriate, against Governmentswhen those Governments are promotingpolicies which are contrary to the NGO’s objectives;
† tyûskennellê tarvittaessa hallituksia vastaan, kun ne ajavat kansalaisjêrjestûjen tavoitteiden vastaisia politiikkoja
Deliver services efficiently and effectively within the framework of Governmentpolicies,where appropriate, and to adopt, where appropriate, strategies consulted and negotiatedbetween NGOs and Government;
† suorittaa palveluja tehokkaasti tarvittaessa hallituksen politiikkojen yhteydessê ja hyvêksyê tar-vittaessa strategioita, joista on jêrjestetty kuulemisia ja kansalaisjêrjestûjen ja hallituksen vêlisiê neuvotteluja
Deliver services efficiently and effectively outside the framework of Governmentpolicieswhen this is necessary and appropriate to promote the NGO’sobjectives, and to adopt,where appropriate, strategies contrary to Government policies;
† suorittaa palveluja tehokkaasti hallituksen politiikkojen ulkopuolella, kun se on tarpeen ja aiheel-lista kansalaisjêrjestûjen tavoitteiden edistêmiseksi, sekê hyvêksyê tarvittaessa hallituksen politiikkojen vastaisia strategioita
Ensure the coordination of its own services and to engage Government in discussionson the coordination of services between the Government and NGOs;
† tarjota kêsiteltêviê aiheita koskevia asianmukaisia, ammattimaisia ja perusteellisesti tutkittuja neuvoja hallituksille
Provide professionally researched advice to Governments on issues of concern;
† kampanjoida muutoksen puolesta tarpeisiin vastaamiseksi
Challenge, by appropriately selected mechanisms acts, omissions, administrative practices or policies which are contrary to the NGO’s objectives;
† kyseenalaistaa asianmukaisesti valittujen mekanismien vêlityksellê kansalaisjêrjestûjen tavoit-teiden vastaiset toimet, laiminlyûnnit, hallintokêytênnût tai politiikat
Keep track of and ensure that advantage is taken of all new developments in combatingdiscrimination, e.g. new legislation (national, EU and international), new policies (national, EU and international), new sources of funding, and landmark judicial decisions(at national, EU and international level);
† seurata syrjinnên torjuntaa koskevia edistysaskelia ja varmistaa, ettê niitê hyûdynnetêên mah-dollisimman hyvin, esimerkiksi uutta lainsêêdêntûê (kansallinen, EU ja kansainvêlinen), uusia politiikkoja (kansallinen, EU ja kansainvêlinen), uusia rahoituslêhteitê ja uraauurtavia oikeudel-lisia pêêtûksiê (sekê kansallinen, EU:n ettê kansainvêlinen taso)
Be open, transparent and accountable to its membership and to the public;
† olla avoin ja vastuuvelvollinen jêsenilleen ja suurelle yleisûlle
Increase the strength of NGO participation in civil society by forming networks andcoalitions, and promoting original initiatives and solutions. This can help to reduceprejudice within society, thus favouring equality;
† vahvistaa kansalaisjêrjestûn osallistumista kansalaisyhteiskuntaan muodostamalla verkostoja ja yhteenliittymiê sekê edistêmêllê omaperêisiê aloitteita ja ratkaisuja, mikê voi vêhentêê yhteiskunnan epêkohtia ja edistêê nêin tasa-arvoa
Work openly and in a spirit of collaboration with other NGOs operating in related fieldsand avoid conflicts and disputes between NGOs;
† tyûskennellê avoimesti ja yhteistyûhengessê muiden alalla toimivien kansalaisjêrjestûjen kans-sa ja vêlttêê kansalaisjêrjestûjen vêliset konfliktit ja riidat
Put pressure on a state to ratify international instruments which allow for the international spotlight to be shone on Government practices;
† painostaa valtiota ratifioimaan kansainvêlisiê instrumentteja, joiden ansiosta muut valtiot saa-vat tietêê hallituksen kêytênnûistê
Supply national and international bodies with vital and reliable information which theyshould draw on when examining a country’s record on discrimination.
† toimittaa kansallisille ja kansainvêlisille elimille olennaisen têrkeitê ja luotettavia tietoja, joihin ne voivat vedota tarkastellessaan valtion mahdollisia syrjintêtoimia.
In summary, the role of many NGOs can be to check, monitor and criticise the actions of Governments and private bodies, to supplement and complement the role of Governmentin combating discrimination and to help individuals and groups assert their rights.
Lyhyesti ottaen useimpien kansalaisjêrjestûjen tehtêvênê voi olla tarkistaa, seurata ja arvostella hallitusten ja yksityisten elinten toimia, têydentêê hallituksen syrjinnên torjuntatehtêviê sekê tukea yksilûitê ja ryhmiê niiden oikeuksien puolustamiseksi.
2.3.What can a NGO do concretely to combat discrimination?
2.3 Miten kansalaisjêrjestû voi torjua konkreettisesti syrjintêê?
The following is a suggested list of activities and services that an NGO can carry out or provide in order to help combat discrimination on all grounds:
Kansalaisjêrjestû voi torjua kaikenlaisiin syihin perustuvaa syrjintêê seuraavien toimien ja palvelu-jen avulla:
Awareness-raising
† tietoisuuden lisêêminen
Monitoring/Influencing the development of policy and law
† yksityisten uhrien ja yhteisen valituksen osapuolten tukeminen
Support to individual victims and to individuals forming part of a collective complaint
† vaihtoehtoinen riidanratkaisumenettely, mukaan lukien vêlimiesmenettely
Combating Discrimination – A Training Manual
2.4 Mitê vêlineitê kansalaisjêrjestû tarvitsee syrjinnên torjunnassa?
2.4.What does a NGO need to fulfil its role?
† Inhimilliset voimavarat
Human resources
† Taidot
Expertise
† Rahoitus
Accountability (NGOs have been at the forefront of debates regarding accountabilityand transparency – key issues for voluntary action)
† Vapaaehtoisjêrjestûistê on tullut yhê useammin paikkoja, joissa ihmiset voivat keskustella heitê kos-kettavista kysymyksistê ja ottaa niihin kantaa ja joissa he tuntevat pystyvênsê muuttamaan asioita.
Voluntary organisations play a crucial role in engaging with communities at the local,regional, national and international level.
2 Kansalaisjêrjestûjen asema syrjinnên torjunnassa nût, ovat kêyneet lêpi kaikki perustamisvaiheet oikeassa jêrjestyksessê ja saaneet rekisterûin-nissê vaaditut asiakirjat.
While disaffection with politics grows, engagement in voluntary and community activities is a way for people to contribute to public life by donating their time or money and supporting issues which are of concern to them.
Jêrjestûjen on pêêtettêvê, miten têrkeêê rekisterûinti on ja kannattaako se.
Voluntary organisations have increasingly become places where people can debate andengage in issues that affect them, and where they feel they can advocate for change.
Niiden onkin varmistuttava, ettê ne tiedottavat kysymyksistê niille henki-lûille ja organisaatioille, jotka pystyvêt vaikuttamaan asioihin.
2.6.What arethe obstacles for NGOs and how might thesebe overcome?
Ne voi-vatkin tukea ja avustaa niitê tahoja, jotka pystyvêt vaikuttamaan asioihin, tai pyrkiê uudista-maan sêêntûjê.
Complex rules surrounding the requirements that NGOs must meet in order to be registered.
† Kansalaisjêrjestûê ei ehkê hyvêksytê puolueettomaksi puolestapuhujaksi, jos sillê katsotaan olevan suhteita hallitukseen tai poliittiseen puolueeseen.
NGOs seeking registration should make sure they have a detailed familiaritywith these rules and have taken the correct steps and obtained the documents requiredfor compliance.
Hyvin toimivan kansalaisjêrjestûn onkin oltava varovainen kannattaessaan jotain asiaa, eikê sillê saa olla suhteita poliittiseen puolueeseen, mikê on varmistettava erityistoimin.
Prohibition on organisations carrying out certain activities if not registered.
† Kansalaisjêrjestûllê ei ole riittêvêsti tietoja ja taitoja etenkêên organisaatiojohtamisessa ja rahoitushallinnossa tai informaatiotekniikoiden kêytûssê.
Organisations have to decide how important this is and whether or not to register.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen olisikin varmis-tettava, ettê ne ymmêrtêvêt moitteettoman organisaatiojohtamisen ja rahoitushallinnon mer-kityksen.
Perception of affiliation to Government or a political party threatening acceptance asan impartial advocate of issues.
Syrjinnên torjunta › Koulutuskêsikirja paneiksi•, joilla on tasavertainen asema, mutta erilainen ja têrkeê tehtêvê yhteiskunnan kehit-têmisessê.
A good NGO needs to be careful to espouse a cause,not to be affiliated to a political party and steps should be taken to ensure that this isthe case.
Hallitukset sêêtêvêt ja panevat têytêntûûn sêêntûjê ja asetuksia, joissa mêêritetêên kansalaisjêrjestûjen toiminnan pohjana oleva tarvittava poliittinen ympêristû.
Lack of knowledge and skills, particularly in organisational and financial managementor the use of IT.
† Yritysmaailman mahdollista tukea ei hyûdynnetê riittêvêsti.
NGOs should ensure that they understand the importance of goodorganisational and financial management.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen olisikin pyrittê-vê saavuttamaan •yritysmaailman sitoumuksia•.
They must either acquire the services (paidor unpaid) of qualified professionals or undertake appropriate training (or both).
Yhê useammat kansalaisjêrjestût luovat nykyi-sin suhteita yritysmaailmaan perustamalla •kumppanuuksia•, joiden tarkoituksena on kêsitellê yhdessê avainkysymyksiê.
Lack of funding and limited resources, lack of information and guidance on accessingavailable national, EU and international funds.
† Joihinkin yhteiskunnan osa-alueisiin ei saada kosketusta, koska ne eivêt ole asiasta kiinnostu-neita, niille on mêêrêtty ulkopuolelta valitut oikeudelliset tai poliittiset tavoitteet tai esteenê on kulttuuri tai kieli.
National equality commission, NGO coordination bodies, local EU representations and regional international donors shouldbe contacted to identify suitable sources of funding.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen olisi varmistettava, ettê niiden omilla organisaatioilla on moneen alaan perehtyneitê tyûntekijûitê, jotka ovat tietoisia syrjintêkysymyksistê, sosiaalisesta ja poliittisesta historiasta, myûs yhteiskuntaryhmien syrjinnêstê, ja ettê henkilûstûllê on tarvit-taessa riittêvê kielitaito.
Tax/other relevant laws of the donor or recipient country that may not be supportiveof NGOs.
Têstê ovat esimerkkinê organi-soidun infrastruktuurin tai hierarkian ja/tai hallintojêrjestelmên puute.
For example, a considerable obstacle to the health and sustainability of the NGO sector in Japan is the fact that previously Japan had not granted tax deductiblestatus to most of its not-for-profit organisations.
Têmê saattaa johtua erilaisista tekijûistê, kuten rahoituksen vêhyydestê, voimavaroista, ajankêytûstê, haluttomuu-desta toimia tyûnantajana, henkilûstûn jatkuvuuden puutteesta (etenkin jêrjestûssê, jossa innokkaat vapaaehtoiset vaihtuvat nopeasti), tyûntekijûiden alhaisesta tyûmoraalista tai suora-naisesta kaaoksesta, eivêtkê kansalaisjêrjestût pysty nêin hyûdyntêmêên koko potentiaaliaan.
The US experience, on the other hand,has shown that tax benefits for not-for-profit organisations help stimulate contributions from the public and promotes private charitable giving from the forprofit sector.
Tilanne voidaan korjata sopimalla hallintotehtêvien jakamisesta, jêrjestêmêllê erityistê hallinto-koulutusta, varmistamalla pêtevê sisêinen hallinto ja tarkastelemalla sêênnûllisesti hallinto- ja tyûkêytêntûkysymyksiê.
Forprofit corporations can offer know-how, resources, and technical assistance, while NGOs offer practical on-the-ground knowledge, relationships,and networks needed to get the job done in a way that renders the final product sustainable.
Têmê asiakirja on saatavilla albanian, bulgarian, englannin, latvian, liettuan, ranskan, serbin ja venêjên kielellê.
Combating Discrimination – A Training Manual that their own organisationshave a diverse workforce with personnel trained in discrimination awareness issues, awareness of the social and political history, includinghistory of exclusion and discrimination of the groups within the community and, whererelevant, a range of language skills.
† Osallistujat tuntevat erilaiset toimet ja palvelut, joiden avulla kansalaisjêrjestût voivat auttaa torjumaan syrjintêê kêytênnûssê.
Poor management or employment practices occur frequently in NGOs and can damagemorale and can impede the effectiveness of the NGO.
Kansalaisjêrjestût voivat tiedottaa tasa-arvokysymyksistê monin tavoin tyûmarkkinaosapuolille ja laajemmalle kansalliselle yhteisûlle.
Examples are lack or absence ofan organised infrastructure or hierarchy, and/or a lack or absence of a management system.
Monet syrjinnên uhrit eivêt tiedê oikeuksiaan, miten heidên on toimittava tai mistê he saavat apua.
This may be due to a number of factors, including minimal funding, resources,time, resistance to taking on the role of employer, continuity of personnel (especiallyin an organisation where there is a high turnover of enthusiastic volunteers), low staffmorale or downright chaos, and results in NGOs not reaching their full efficiencypotential.
Merkittêvimpien rahoittajien ja kansalaisjêrjestûjen yhteenliittymên suorittaman tutkimuksen mukaan kansalaisjêrjestûjen tyûn tehokkuus riippuu niiden puolustamista kysymyksistê tiedotta-misen lisêksi myûs niiden omasta ja suuren yleisûn tietoisuudesta siitê, ettê myûs ne ovat organi-saatioita.
This can be overcome by agreed allocation of management roles, specificmanagement training, competent internal administration and regular review ofadministrative and employment matters.
Kyse on erillisestê mutta asiaan liittyvêstê aiheesta, jonka avulla tiedotetaan syrjintêkysy-myksistê, joita kansalaisjêrjestût pyrkivêt kêsittelemêên. Têmê kysymys sivuutetaan usein.
For example, the Council of Europe document ‘Fundamental Principles on the Status of NGOs in Europe’ – www.coe.int/T/E/NGO/public/PrincFondam%20en%20engl.pdf.
Kansalais-jêrjestût voivat tarvittaessa vedota etenkin neuvoston direktiivin 2000/78/EY 14 artiklaan ja neuvoston direktiivin 2000/43/EY 12 artiklaan hallituksen kanssa kêytêvêssê vuoropuhelussa têllaisten toimien tukemiseksi.