natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This document exists in English, French, Albanian, Bulgarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Russianand Serbian.
Yhteistyûhûn voivat sisêltyê kokoukset, koordinaatiotoimet sekê yhteisûn painopistealueiden mêêrittêminen.
For the participants to have explored various activities and services that NGOs canundertake and provide in order to help combat discrimination on a practical level
† Asiakirjojen ja teknisen asiantuntemuksen saanti esimerkiksi seuraavasti:
Although some people are consciously prejudiced against certain groups and knowingly discriminate against them, many more members of society are unaware that their conduct andattitudes are discriminatory.
‹ Kumppanuuksien luominen muiden jêrjestûjen kanssa erityisohjelmien soveltamiseksi.
This lack of awareness is sometimes one of the first hurdles tobe overcome in the efforts made to work towards equality.
‹ Tietoisuus kansalaisjêrjestûn ohjelmien nivoutumisesta hallituksen pitkên aikavêlin suunni-telmiin.
There are many ways for NGOsto communicate knowledge and information on equality issues to the social partners andthe wider national community.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen on pystyttêvê ilmoittamaan yhteisesti, miten niiden toimet sopivat nêihin laajempiin suunnitelmiin.
Many victims of discrimination are unaware of their rights and what to do or where to gofor help.
Samalla kun kansalaisjêrjestût kohentavat omaa profiiliaan, ne lisêêvêt myûs tietoisuutta tietyistê niitê kiinnostavista syrjinnên aloista.
Self or institutional awareness-raising
Mikê on tietoisuuden lisêêmisen tarkoitus?
Research carried out by major funders and NGO consortia has shown that, for NGOs to workeffectively,they not only need to raise awareness of the issues they espouse but also thepublic’sawareness of themselves as organisations.
† Asenteiden, kêyttêytymisten ja kaavamaisten mallien muuttaminen, uusien toimien tuen vah-vistaminen, tasa-arvoa koskevan asialistan kêyttûûnoton edistêminen jne.
It is also often overlooked.
Mitkê ovat kohderyhmêt?
NGOs specifically dealing with discrimination issues therefore need to develop parallelstrategies to raise awareness of themselvesand their own aims and objectives as well as ofthe discrimination issues their work seek to address.
† Julkinen mielipide, syrjinnên uhrit ja mahdolliset uhrit, julkisen ja yksityisen sektorin tyûnanta-jat, palvelujentarjoajat, mukaan lukien asuminen, koulutuselimet, lainvalvontaviranomaiset jne.
This strategy might include:
Tavat tietoisuuden lisêêmiseksi
Establishing a visible presence by participating in relevant meetings and events or byjoining committees/taskforces on issues of importance.
† Tietoista tai tiedotonta syrjintêê koskevien esimerkkien mêêrittêminen etenkin, kun niihin sisêl-tyy epêinhimillistê tai alentavaa kohtelua.
Such events may be ideal placesto meet and set up individual meetings with other organisations looking for partners,as well as donors, who can fund services directly.For a dialogue with the Governmenton support for such activities, where needed, NGOs can rely in particular on Article 14of Council Directive 2000/78/EC and Article 12 Council Directive 2000/43/EC.
† Sen ymmêrtêminen, miltê syrjinnên kohteeksi joutuminen tuntuu (esimerkiksi saamalla ihmiset kokemaan myûtêtuntoa syrjinnên uhreja kohtaan), ja sen kêsityksen kumoaminen, ettê uhrit ovat niitê •toisia•.
Combating Discrimination – A Training Manual
‹ syrjinnên uhrien oikeuksia koskeva laki
Acquiring materials and technical expertise – for example:
‹ valtuudet, joiden avulla ihmisiê voidaan suojella syrjinnêltê
Asking for a specialist in the discrimination field to provide technical assistance orto be seconded to that NGO;
‹ menettelyt, joiden avulla voidaan riitauttaa syrjintêê torjuvan lainsêêdênnûn rikkomukset
Requesting specific areas of training;
3.2 Politiikan ja lain kehittymisen seuranta ja siihen vaikuttaminen
Establishing partnership with other organisations to implement specific programmes;
† Lainsêêdênnûn ja politiikkojen têytêntûûnpanoa
Understanding the relationship of NGO programmes to long-term Governmentplans.
† Politiikkojen vaikutuksia haavoittuviin vêestûryhmiin.
It is important for NGOs to be able to state collectively where their activitiesfit into these larger plans.
Moitteeton seuranta on asianmukaisen ja luotettavan tiedon tae sekê tehokkaan painostuksen edellytys.
Some NGOs are often better able to address an unmetneed, offer an alternative viewpoint, and stimulate debate on issues that are notyet mainstreamed by the Government.
Tutkimusta ja painostusta kêyttêvêên seurantaan voi sisêltyê seuraavaa:
In raising their own profile, NGOs will also be raising awareness of the particular areas ofdiscrimination which are their interest.
† kysymykset pyritêên saamaan hallituksen kêsittelyyn kokouksessa tai kirjoittamalla ministereil-le ja virkamiehille
Who are the target groups?
† kuulemisasiakirjoihin vastaaminen
Public opinion, victims or potential victims, public and private sector employers, providersof services including housing, educational bodies, enforcement authorities, etc.
† tiivis yhteistyû hallituksen kanssa (tarvittaessa) aina, kun têmê on mahdollista (osallistumalla tyû-ryhmiin jne.)
By providing information, by organising campaigns, by educating and training, bydoing research and making it public, by networking and building alliances, by doingmedia work.
† uusien lakien vaikutuksen seuranta, ja kun uusilla laeilla on vahingollinen vaikutus tiettyihin ryh-miin, têstê asiasta tiedottaminen hallitukselle, muille kansalaisjêrjestûille jne.
By identifying examples of conscious or unconscious discrimination which occur,partic-ularly where these involve inhuman or degrading treatment.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen on tiedostettava valmiutensa tukea syrjinnên uhreja. Têssê yhteydessê kansa-laisjêrjestût voivat vedota neuvoston direktiivin 2000/78/EY 9 artiklan 2 kohtaan ja neuvoston direktiivin 2000/43/EY 7 artiklan 2 kohtaan.
By providing reasons, understandable by and acceptable to the community at large,why such discrimination is prohibited and the significance of the fact that this prohibition is written into law.
Tuessa on aina otettava huomioon uhrien tilanteen arkaluontoisuus ja heidên lêpikêymênsê monet tunteet (suuttumus, itsetunnon puute, haluttomuus paljastaa tai toistaa joko sanallisia tai muunlaisia loukkauksia, eris-tymisen tunne, pelko elinympêristûnsê menettêmisestê, vastatoimien pelko, uhriksi joutumisen pelko).
By personalising the understanding of what suffering discrimination is like (i.e. educat-ingpeople to empathisewith the victims of discrimination) and moving away from seeing the victims as ‘others’.
Kansalaisjêrjestûjen on tuettava uhreja ammattimaisesti mutta myûtêtuntoisesti. Tukea voi olla monenlaista › esimerkkejê seuraavassa:
– the legislation giving effect to those rights, and in particular the duty on Statesunder Article 12 Council Directive 2000/78/EC and Article 10 of Council Directive2000/43/EC to disseminate information about the content of the Directives by allappropriate means;
† Realististen tietojen ja neuvojen antaminen valituksen jatkamisen todennêkûisestê tuloksesta
– the powers that exist to protect people against discrimination;
† Ammattineuvonnan antaminen (tai sen saannin mahdollistaminen) uhrien itsetunnon palaut-tamiseksi (tai luomiseksi)
– the routes to challenging violations of anti-discrimination legislation; and
† Uhrien tavoitteiden mêêrittêminen valituksen jatkamisessa ja sen yhteensovittaminen kansa-laisjêrjestûn toimiin ja tavoitteisiin
– the details of relevant organisations and authorities specifically established to dealwith particular areas of discrimination.
† Tarvittaessa epêvirallisten ratkaisumahdollisuuksien ehdottaminen (esimerkiksi vêlimiesme-nettely uhrin, jolta on evêtty asunnon saanti, ja asunnon omistajan vêlillê, jotta hên harkitsisi uudelleen pêêtûstêên)
3.2.Monitoring/Influencing the development of policy and law
† Tasa-arvokysymyksiê koskevien asiantuntijatutkimusten ja tilastotietojen toimittaminen.
NGOs can have an important role to play in monitoring and influencing the developmentofpolicy and law as they are uniquely well-placed to bring grass roots knowledge of theproblems and thoughtful consideration of possible solutions to the attention of the authorities. NGOs need to make a policy decision as to whether this is an activity they have theexpertise and capacity to undertake (see ‘Skills and tools’ Section).
Lisêksi kansalaisjêrjestût voivat tyûtê ja ammattia koskevissa syrjintêtapauksissa › jos kansalaisjêr-jestût ovat luoneet rakentavia suhteita tyûantajaelimiin (•johtajistoon•) ja tyûsuojeluvirastojen kaltaisiin lakimêêrêisiin têytêntûûnpanoelimiin › ottaa yhteyttê tyûnantajiin yhteisesti uhreille miellyttêvêmmêllê tavalla.
Practices and attitudes in determined sectors (public administrations, employment,access to services, etc.)
Nêillê asianaja-jilla on oltava ehdottomasti riittêvê alaa koskeva asiantuntemus ja pêtevyys.
Effects of policies on vulnerable groups.
† Kansalaisjêrjestûûn liittyneen asianajajaryhmên perustaminen.
By undertaking research, by collecting data, by developing indicators.
Syrjinnên torjunta › Koulutuskêsikirja
Good monitoring will lead to relevant and reliable information and is a prerequisite foreffective lobbying.
† Suhteiden luominen lakiyrityksiin ja niiden rohkaiseminen hankkimaan tarvittavaa asiantunte-musta asioiden kêsittelemiseksi joko maksullisesti (jos têhên on saatavissa varoja) tai maksutta, jos varoja ei ole.
Monitoring the effect of new laws, and where new laws have an adverse impact onparticular groups bringing this to the attention of Government, other NGOs, etc.
† Ilmoittaminen Euroopan komissiolle direktiivejê rikkovista hallintokêytênnûistê rikkomusme-nettelyn aloittamiseksi sekê tarvittavan tiedon ja tuen tarjoamiseksi komissiolle, kun têllaiset menettelyt kêynnistetêên.
3.3.Support to individual victims
Vaihtoehtoinen riidanratkaisumenettely
NGOs must recognise their capacity in relation to supporting victims of discrimination. Inthis context, NGOs can rely on Article 9(2) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC and Article 7(2)of Council Directive 2000/43/EC.
EU:n jêsenvaltioissa ja Euroopan neuvostossa on erilaisia vaihtoehtoisia riidanratkaisumenettelyjê, esimerkiksi sovittelumenettely ja vêlimiesmenettely.
Some NGOs will have the skills and resources to provide detailed advice and support including legal representation.
Joissain valtioissa vaihtoehtoinen riidanratkaisumenettely on oikeudenkêynnin todellinen vaihto-ehto.
Other NGOs may be able to help the victim diagnose that the treatment they have received may constitute unlawful discrimination and assist with some initialinquiries.
Osapuolet voivat yleensê turvautua koulutettuun vêlittêjêên tai yhteisesti sovittuun sovitte-lijaan tai sovittelijapaneeliin, joiden avulla osapuolet pêêsevêt yhteisesti hyvêksyttyyn sopimuk-seen ja valitus/riitamenettely saadaan nêin ratkaistua.
Another group of NGOs may lack skills and experience even to embark on basicdiagnosis and should immediately refer the person to a more suitable source of advice andassistance.
Sopimuksella ei vêlttêmêttê ole lainvoimaa, mutta sen avulla pystytêên ratkaisemaan usein sekê nêkyvêt ettê taustalla olevat ongelmat oikeu-denkêyntiê tyydyttêvêmmin.
NGOs must be careful not to try to do more in this area than they feel capable ofdoing.
Jos toinen osapuoli peruuttaa sopimuksen, kumpikin osapuolista voi vielê nostaa kanteen tuomioistuimessa.
This is why conducting a skills audit is so important (see ‘Skills and tools’ Section).
Joissain oikeusjêrjestelmissê têllê tavoin saavutettu sopimus saattaa olla velvoittava ja se voidaan vahvistaa tuomioistuimissa, jos toinen osapuolista peruuttaa sen.
NGOs should provide broad-based support to individual victims of discrimination.
Vêlitysneuvottelujen lopussa saavutetut sopimukset rekisterûidêên yleensê tuomioistuimessa, ja ne voidaan panna têytêntûûn.
This support must always take into account the sensitivities of the victims and the range of emotions which they will be experiencing (anger, lack of self-esteem, reluctance to disclose or
Jos osapuolet eivêt pêêse sopimukseen, valitus voidaan jêttêê varsinaisiin tuomioistuimiin.
Providing specialist information and advice to victims as to the most appropriate mechanism for challenging the discrimination they have suffered.
4 Syrjinnên torjumisessa tarvittavat taidot ja vêlineet
Providing realistic information and advice about the likely outcome of pursuing a complaint.
† Osallistujat tietêvêt, mitê tietoja ja taitoja kansalaisjêrjestûltê vaaditaan syrjintêê torjuvana yhteiskunnan elimenê.
Identifying the victims’ objectives in pursuing a complaint and reconciling this with the NGO’s policies and objectives.
† suhteet muihin kansalaisjêrjestûihin.
Proposing, when appropriate, possibilities of informal resolution (e.g. mediatebetween a victim who has been denied an apartment and the owner in order to makehim reconsider his decision).
Têtê varten on mêêritettêvê, onko sillê ja/tai tarvitseeko se mitêên seuraavista taidoista (kaikki kansalaisjêrjestût eivêt tarvitse kaikkia taitoja).
Establishing a legal team able to provide the necessary legal support for acts of discrimination to be challenged (see Article 13 Council Directive 2000/43/EC and Article 9Council Directive 2000/78/EC).
Arvioinnin tarkoituksena on mêêrittêê ne taidot, joita kunkin kansalaisjêrjestûn tyûntekijêt tarvit-sevat jêrjestûn pêêtavoitteiden saavuttamiseksi:
Litigation
† koulutustaidot
Various options exist for NGOs wishing to use litigation to combat discrimination:
† ihmistenvêlisiê suhteita ja verkottumista koskevat taidot
The acquisition of the necessary specialist knowledge and skills bythose lawyers is essential.
† poliittisia prosesseja koskeva hyvê tietêmys ja tuntemus
Establishing a team of lawyers affiliated to the NGO with the relevant expertise whoare able and willing to litigate on behalf of individuals or groups.
† tarvittavat kielitaidot asianmukaisten kansainvêlisten asiakirjojen tai menettelyjen ymmêrtêmi-seksi
Developing a litigation policy suitable to the NGO’s policies and objectives, the national system and to the incidence of complaints.
† hyûdyntêmêllê suhteita muihin kansalaisjêrjestûihin mm. koulutuksen, ohjauksen ja taitojen vaihdon avulla
NGOs may decide to adopt a litigationstrategy, or set litigation priorities, or offer an across the board service.
† turvaamalla asianomaisten taitojen saatavuus mm. luomalla siteitê paikallisiin liikeyrityksiin, ammattilaisiin tai koulutuksen tarjoajiin
Litigating before national judicial bodies (including constitutional complaints wherethese are possible), in particular ensuring that NGOs use the rights accorded by Article9of Council Directive 2000/78/EC and Article 7 of Council Directive 2000/43/EC.
Kansalaisjêrjestûn on arvioitava vêlineitêên sen mêêrittêmiseksi, mitê •vêlineitê• se kêyttêê ja/tai voisi kêyttêê yksilûityjen pêêtavoitteidensa saavuttamiseksi.
Where discrimination-related criminal offences have been committed, such as incitement to racial hatred, homophobic assault, religiously motivated violence, ensuringthat prosecutors and investigating judges carry out their tasks with due diligence,bringing legal action where appropriate to ensure that this is done.
Kampanjat olisi kohdistettava poliitikoille, paikallisviranomaisille ja muille pêêtûksentekijûille. Kansalaisjêrjestûn olisi ilmoitettava ministereille tosiasioista, jotka koskevat kampanjassa puolus-
Where such criminal offences have been committed and no charges are brought by theprosecutor,advising victims regarding the possibility of bringing a private prosecution,where this is allowed by national law, and, where appropriate, assisting them to do so.
4 Syrjinnên torjumisessa tarvittavat taidot ja vêlineet tettavia kysymyksiê. Sen olisi tuotava lakialoitteita ja lakeja koskevat kantansa esille ja vaadittava, ettê viranomaiset ja hallituksen virastot auttavat ihmisiê asianmukaisesti.
Ensuring referrals of important points of interpretation of the EU Directives are madeto the ECJ by national courts (see Section on ‘National law and procedure’).
Ver-kottuminen auttaa nêin jêrjestûê luomaan ajantasaisia ja hyûdyllisiê kontakteja sisêltêvên tieto-kannan.
Alerting the European Commission to administrative practices which violate the Directiveswith a view to the initiation of infringement proceedings and providing the necessaryinformation and support to the Commission when such proceedings are initiated.
Kansalaisjêrjestût voivat esimerkiksi pyytêê muita samantapaisilla aloilla tyûskenteleviê jêrjestûjê osallistumaan •pyûreên pûydên• keskusteluihin, joissa jêrjestût voivat sopia painostusta ja kam-panjointia koskevista tavoitteista ja jakaa tietoja hankkeista, joihin ne osallistuvat.
Technically,of the above mentioned only complaints taken to the European Court of Human Rights are, strictly speaking, correctly classified as litigation, but the procedures are quasi judicial in nature and are thus included here rather than in the section on ADR.
Têmê on têrkeêê etenkin, jos jêrjestût kilpailevat samasta rahoituksesta. Yhteistyûn ja tietojen jakamisesta koituvat taloudelliset hyûdyt vapautta-vat myûs varoja, joita voidaan sitten kêyttêê muihin tarkoituksiin, ehkê jêlleen yhteisesti.
Conciliation procedure is specifically referred to in Article 7(1) of Council Directive2000/43/EC and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC.
Tutkimuksella on merkittêvê asema pyrittêessê vaikut-tamaan hallituksen korkeimman tason pêêtûksentekijûihin.
ADR takes many different forms in the Member States of the EU and the Council of Europe,and might include conciliation, mediation and arbitration.
Parhainta ja tehokkainta tutkimusta harjoittavat kansalaisjêrjestût, joilla on kokemusta, taitoja ja voima-varoja tyûn suorittamiseksi korkeiden ammattistandardien mukaisesti.
In some countries ADR is a true alternative to litigation.
Têmê on kansalaisjêrjestûn arvostamisen ehdoton edellytys.
The parties typically have access toatrained mediator or mutually agreed arbitrator, or a panel of arbitrators, who assist themin coming to a mutually acceptable agreement which brings the complaint/dispute processto a conclusion.
Monilla kansalaisjêrjestûillê ei ole nêitê taitoja, eikê niiden pitêisi tart-tua têllaiseen tyûhûn ilman niitê.
The agreement may have no legal force but can often solve both the surfaceand the underlying problem more satisfactorily than litigation.
Huonolaatuinen tutkimus voi vahingoittaa sekê kansalaisjêrjestûê ettê niiden puolustamaa asiaa.
If either party reneges on theagreement, both parties will still have access to court.
Kansalaisjêrjestût voivat sen sijaan usein osallistua asiantuntijoiden harjoit-tamaan tutkimukseen tarjoamalla heille nêiden tarvitsemia tietoja.
In some systems, the agreement reached in this way may be binding and can be enforcedin the courts if either party reneges on it.
Tietoja voi kerêtê myûs kêtevêsti tietoisuuskartoitusten ja tilastoanalyysien avulla kêyttêmêllê kyselylomakkeita.
Many countries of Central and Eastern Europe have developed more formal systems ofmediation which are regulated by specific laws on mediation and which involve the services of a judge as mediator or arbitrator, without recourse to formal legal proceedings.
Kansalaisjêrjestût voivat sitten yhdistêê ja laatia kattavia tutkimuskertomuksia, tyûasiakirjoja ja/tai lyhyempiê tutkimustuloksia koskevia selontekoja, todistus- ja tapaustutkimuksia, poliittisia kysy-myksiê kêsitteleviê julkaisuja, sêênnûllisiê tiedotteita, tilastokatsauksia, tulosten yhteenvetoja ja tietolehtisiê sekê julkaista niitê paperiversioina tai muilla tavoin (esimerkiksi kansalaisjêrjestûjen toimien kokoelmana tai Internet-sivustona).
Typically the agreements reached at the end of such mediated discussions will be registeredwith the court and are enforceable. If the parties cannot reach an agreement, recourse canbe had to the ordinary courts.
Kansalaisjêrjestût voivat tiedottaa asioista sêhkûisesti tai postitse tietokannassaan oleville kontak-teille useita kertoja vuodessa, ja nêmê kontaktit julkaisevat tutkimus- ja tilastotoimia poliittisissa ja tutkimusyhteisûissê.
Sometimes more than one of these systems exists and there is a certain degree of overlap.
Nêiden tietojen avulla kansalaisjêrjestû voi kehittêê helpommin pilottihankkeita teorioidensa toteuttamiseksi kêytênnûssê siellê, missê niistê on hyûtyê, eli yhteisûssê.
Both mediation and arbitration are highly-skilled professional activities.
Tiedotusvêlineet ohjaavat nyky-yhteiskunnassa pitkêlti ihmisten ajatusmaailmaa.
In many countries Colleges of Mediation and/or Arbitration have been established to ensure that the higheststandards are met.
Niiden avulla pystytêên ehkê kaikkein parhaiten tiedottamaan asioista suurelle yleisûlle ja vaikuttamaan julki-seen mielipiteeseen.
NGOs may wish to acquire those skills for themselves so that their personnel can put themselves forward as credible mediators.
Tyûskentely tiedotusvêlineiden kanssa on siksi avainkysymys ja jêrjestûjen olisi pyrittêvê aktiivisesti lûytêmêên toimittajia (radio, televisio, uutisia kêsittelevêt Internet-sivut sekê lehdistû), joiden kanssa ne voivat keskustella ja tyûskennellê.
Alternatively they may wish toforge links with trained mediators on whose services they can call on behalf of victims ofdiscrimination.
Kansalaisjêrjestûn olisi varattava paljon aikaa ja energiaa lehdistûtiedotteiden julkaisemiseen sekê tasa-arvoa ja ihmisoikeuskysy-myksiê koskevien lehdistûkampanjoiden rohkaisemiseen.
Other national and international ADR non-judicial mechanisms may also be appropriate,e.g. complaints to the relevant national ombudsman, petitioning the European Parliament.
Jêrjestûn olisi siksi turvaudut-tava tiedotusvêlineisiin, jotta asioista pystytêên tiedottamaan ihmisille, ja varmistettava samalla sanoman vêlittyminen oikeille henkilûille mêêrittêmêllê kohderyhmêt.
4.Skills and tools when workingtowards combating discrimination
† Lehdistûtiedotteiden julkaiseminen, kun paikallinen tai kansallinen hallitus esittêê uusia toi-mia
Intended learning outcomes
† Lehdistûkonferenssien pitêminen
Fortheparticipants to have explored the skills and tools required for a NGO, as anorgan of civil society, to combat discrimination
† Kirjeiden kirjoittaminen sanomalehdille, jotta ne julkaistaisiin
NGOs need to carry out a ‘skills audit’ within their organisation so as to establish what skillsare needed to achieve the organisation’smain objectivesin its work towards combatingdiscrimination, and what skills are lacking within the organisation in the context of fulfilling its identified objectives.
† Tiedostusvêlineiden seuraaminen vêêrien tietojen, yksipuolisten mielipiteiden, syrjivien kuvien ja kaavamaisten mallien havaitsemiseksi ja tyûskentely tiedostusvêlineiden kanssa niiden pois-tamiseksi.
The organisation will need to consider if it has, and/or needs to acquire, knowledge andexpertise,from:
Sen sisêltû riippuu luonnollisesti kohderyh-mêstê (lainvalvontaviranomaiset, toimittajat, koulut).
• its own staff or
Kun jêrjestû on
• its own membership or
† luonut oman profiilinsa (katso osa •Aihekohtaiset kysymykset•) ja
• links with other NGOs by identifying whether it has and/or needs any of the following (not all these skills areneeded by all NGOs).
† hankkinut tarvittavan koulutuskokemuksen se pystyy tarjoamaan tasa-arvoa edistêvêê koulutusta.
The purpose of the audit is to identify the skills that each NGO needs to carry out its mainobjectives:
Ammattitaitoiseen koulutukseen kuuluu myûs tietojen levittêmisessê hyûdyllisten koulutusmate-riaalien ja tietopakettien suunnittelu ja tarjoaminen.
Personnel with counselling skills
Syrjinnên torjunta › Koulutuskêsikirja
Personnel with good interpersonal and networking skills
† tavoitteet ja
Personnel with good public relations and communication skills
4.2.B Informaatiotekniikoita koskevat taidot
Personnel with awareness of and familiarity with political processes
Sen on pohdittava tarkkaan, mitê erityistê tarkoitusta varten Internet-sivut luodaan, ja punnittava sen kustannukset ja hyûdyt.
Personnel with the necessary language skills to access appropriate international materials or processes
Lisêksi kansalaisjêrjestûjen olisi pystyttêvê jakamaan ja vaihtamaan kontak-ti- ja muita tietoja toisten osapuolten kanssa.
Personnel with fund-raising skills
4 Syrjinnên torjumisessa tarvittavat taidot ja vêlineet