natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Paragraph 25 The contract for 19 572 euro was established and signed by the Temporary Administrator of the SJU in 2007, at a time where the SJU had no staff nor internal organisation. 
Kohta 25 Tämä 19 572 euron sopimuksen laati ja allekirjoitti SJU:n tilapäinen hallinnoitsija vuonna 2007, aikana, jolloin SJU:lla ei ollut henkilökuntaa eikä sisäistä organisaatiota.
The SJU has launched in 2009 the correct procurement procedure to replace the contract. 
SJU on käynnistänyt vuonna 2009 asian­ mukaisen hankintamenettelyn sopimuksen korvaamiseksi.
The SJU acknowledges the Court’s finding that it should have been able to obtain better evidence to support the payment of 922 000 euro and it already ensures that formal statements of services rendered are available. 
SJU myöntää tilintarkastustuomioistuimen havainnon mukaisesti, että sen olisi pitänyt pystyä hankkimaan parempaa näyttöä 922 000 euron maksamisen tueksi.
However, the contract comprised support activities and professional legal advice to be charged on a time basis; these activities were performed on a continuous if not daily basis, in a very dense period of activity for the SJU (completion of negotiations with members) and were continuously monitored by the SJU. 
Sopimukseen kuului myös tukitoimintoja ja ammatillista oikeus­ neuvontaa, joista laskutettiin käytetyn ajan perusteella. Näitä toimintoja suoritettiin jatkuvasti lähes päivittäin SJU:n kannalta erittäin kiireisenä ajanjaksona (neuvottelujen päätökseen saattaminen jäsenten kanssa) ja SJU seurasi niitä jatkuvasti.
The outputs of the contract, such as draft membership and multilateral framework agreements, were worked on by SJU staff and support contractors in close and continuous cooperation, in particular through multiple exchanges of documents by email. 
SJU:n työntekijät ja tukisopimuskumppanit käsittelivät sopimusten tuloksina synty­ neitä jäsenyyssopimusten ja monikantaisten puitesopimusten luonnoksia läheisessä ja jatkuvassa yhteistyössä, erityisesti usein tapahtuneena asiakirjojen vaihtona sähköpostin avulla.
Paragraph 26 The SJU inherited the rental contract for the former premises of the Galileo Joint Undertaking in 2007 which were soon found to be inadequate for its needs, as agreed by the Administrative Board in 2008. 
Kohta 26 SJU peri aikaisempien toimitilojen vuokrasopimuksen Galileo-yhteisyritykseltä vuonna 2007. Tilat huomat­ tiin pian riittämättömiksi SJU:n tarpeita ajatellen, kuten hallintoneuvostokin totesi vuonna 2008.
The SJU, consequently, had to balance the risk of delaying the programme launch with the cost of moving to adequate premises. 
Tämän seurauksena SJU:n oli etsittävä tasapainoa yhtäällä ohjelman käynnistymisen viivästymisriskin ja toisaalla asianmukaisiin toimitiloihin muuttamisen kustannusten välillä.
The SJU negotiated the contract for its new premises within its rental budget without the need to request additional resources from the Administrative Board. 
SJU neuvotteli uusia toimitiloja koskevan sopimuksen vuokria varten käytössä olleiden talousarviomäärärahojen puitteissa tarvitsematta pyytää lisäre­ sursseja hallintoneuvostolta.
Paragraph 28 The SJU acknowledges the Court’s concern but remains confident that it will be able to identify the funding source and costs necessary to activate assets at a proper value when required. 
Kohta 28 SJU yhtyy tilintarkastustuomioistuimen huolenaiheeseen, mutta on edelleen luottavainen sen suhteen, että se pystyy yksilöimään rahoituslähteen ja tarpeelliset menot voidakseen tarpeen tullen aktivoida omaisuutta sen oikeasta arvosta.
Paragraph 30 The SJU is undertaking the necessary measures together with the EC services to implement the recom­ mendations contained in the Court’s Opinion No 2/2010. 
Kohta 30 SJU on ryhtynyt tarvittaviin toimenpiteisiin yhdessä Euroopan komission osastojen kanssa tilintarkastus­ tuomioistuimen lausuntoon nro 2/2010 sisältyneiden suositusten toteuttamiseksi.
Paragraph 31 The SJU will consider the necessity to amend its Statutes taking into account the opinion of the EC services. 
Kohta 31 SJU harkitsee, onko sen tarpeen muuttaa yhtiöjärjestystään ottamalla tällöin huomioon Euroopan komission osastojen lausunnon.
EN C 368/32 Official Journal of the European Union 16.12.2011 INTRODUCTION (2011/C 368/05) 5. 
EN C 368/32 Official Journal of the European Union 16.12.2011 INTRODUCTION (2011/C 368/05) 5.
The SESAR JU started to work autonomously on REPORT on the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2010, together with the replies of the Joint Undertaking 1. 
The SESAR JU started to work autonomously on REPORT on the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2010, together with the replies of the Joint Undertaking 1.
The SESAR Joint Undertaking was set up in February 2007 (1), located in Brussels, in order to manage the activities of the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) project. 
The SESAR Joint Undertaking was set up in February 2007 (1), located in Brussels, in order to manage the activities of the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) project.
The SESAR project aims to modernise Air Traffic Management (ATM) in Europe and is divided into three phases: (a) ‘Definition phase’ started in 2005 and led by the European Organisation for Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol), with co-financing from the European Union (EU) budget through the Trans-European Network — Transport programme. 
The SESAR project aims to modernise Air Traffic Management (ATM) in Europe and is divided into three phases: (a) ‘Definition phase’ started in 2005 and led by the European Organisation for Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol), with co-financing from the European Union (EU) budget through the Trans-European Network — Transport programme.
The outcome is the European ATM Master Plan, which defines the content, the development and deployment plans of the next generation of ATM systems. (b) ‘Development phase’ (2008-2013) managed by the SESAR Joint Undertaking (2) and leading to the production of new technological systems, components and operational procedures as defined in the European ATM Master Plan. (c) ‘Deployment phase’ (2014-2020) to be led by industry and stakeholders, for the large-scale production and implemen­ tation of the new air traffic management infrastructure. 
The outcome is the European ATM Master Plan, which defines the content, the development and deployment plans of the next generation of ATM systems. (b) ‘Development phase’ (2008-2013) managed by the SESAR Joint Undertaking (2) and leading to the production of new technological systems, components and operational procedures as defined in the European ATM Master Plan. (c) ‘Deployment phase’ (2014-2020) to be led by industry and stakeholders, for the large-scale production and implemen­ tation of the new air traffic management infrastructure.
The founding members are the European Union repre­ sented by the European Commission, and Eurocontrol repre­ sented by its Agency. 
The founding members are the European Union repre­ sented by the European Commission, and Eurocontrol repre­ sented by its Agency.
Following a call for expressions of interest, 15 public and private enterprises from the air navi­ gation industry are members of the Joint Undertaking. 
Following a call for expressions of interest, 15 public and private enterprises from the air navi­ gation industry are members of the Joint Undertaking.
These include air navigation service providers, ground and aerospace manufacturing industry, aircraft manufacturers, airport authorities and airborne equipment manufacturers. 
These include air navigation service providers, ground and aerospace manufacturing industry, aircraft manufacturers, airport authorities and airborne equipment manufacturers.
ThebudgetforthedevelopmentphaseoftheSESAR project is 2,1 billion euro, to be provided in equal parts by the EU, by Eurocontrol and by the participating public and private partners. 
ThebudgetforthedevelopmentphaseoftheSESAR project is 2,1 billion euro, to be provided in equal parts by the EU, by Eurocontrol and by the participating public and private partners.
The EU contribution is funded from the Seventh Research Framework Programme and the Trans-European Networks — Transport programme. 
The EU contribution is funded from the Seventh Research Framework Programme and the Trans-European Networks — Transport programme.
Around 90 % of the funding from Eurocontrol and the other stakeholders is in the form of in-kind contributions. 
Around 90 % of the funding from Eurocontrol and the other stakeholders is in the form of in-kind contributions.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) (OJ L 64, 2.3.2007, p. 
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) (OJ L 64, 2.3.2007, p.
1) amended by Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 (OJ L 352, 31.12.2008, p. 
1) amended by Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 (OJ L 352, 31.12.2008, p.
(2) The Annex summarises the Joint Undertaking's competences and activities. 
(2) The Annex summarises the Joint Undertaking's competences and activities.
10 August 2007. 
10 August 2007.
PursuanttotheprovisionsofArticle287(1),second paragraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court has audited the annual accounts (3) of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, which comprise the ‘financial statements’ (4) and the ‘reports on implementation of the budget’ (5) for the financial year ended 31 December 2010 and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts. 
PursuanttotheprovisionsofArticle287(1),second paragraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court has audited the annual accounts (3) of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, which comprise the ‘financial statements’ (4) and the ‘reports on implementation of the budget’ (5) for the financial year ended 31 December 2010 and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
The Director's responsibility 8. 
The Director's responsibility 8.
Asauthorisingofficer,theDirectorimplementsthe revenue and expenditure of the budget in accordance with the financial rules of the Joint Undertaking (7) under his own responsibility and within the limits of the authorised appro­ priations (8). 
Asauthorisingofficer,theDirectorimplementsthe revenue and expenditure of the budget in accordance with the financial rules of the Joint Undertaking (7) under his own responsibility and within the limits of the authorised appro­ priations (8).
The Director is responsible for putting in place the organisational structure and the internal management and control systems and procedures relevant for drawing up final accounts(9) that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and for ensuring that the transactions underlying those accounts are legal and regular. 
The Director is responsible for putting in place the organisational structure and the internal management and control systems and procedures relevant for drawing up final accounts(9) that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and for ensuring that the transactions underlying those accounts are legal and regular.
(3) These accounts are accompanied by a report on the budgetary and financial management during the year which gives inter alia an account of the rate of implementation of the appropriations with summary information on the transfers of appropriations among the various budget items. 
(3) These accounts are accompanied by a report on the budgetary and financial management during the year which gives inter alia an account of the rate of implementation of the appropriations with summary information on the transfers of appropriations among the various budget items.
(7) SESAR Financial Rules adopted by the Administrative Board on 28 July 2009. 
(7) SESAR Financial Rules adopted by the Administrative Board on 28 July 2009.
(8) Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 
(8) Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
(9) The rules concerning the presentation of the accounts and accounting by EU bodies are laid down in Chapter 1 of Title VII of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 652/2008 (OJ L 181, 10.07.2008, p. 
(9) The rules concerning the presentation of the accounts and accounting by EU bodies are laid down in Chapter 1 of Title VII of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 652/2008 (OJ L 181, 10.07.2008, p.
23) and are incorporated in the Financial Rules of the SESAR Joint Undertaking. 
23) and are incorporated in the Financial Rules of the SESAR Joint Undertaking.
EN 16.12.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C368/33 The Court's responsibility 9. 
EN 16.12.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C368/33 The Court's responsibility 9.
The Court's responsibility is to provide, on the basis of its audit, a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them. 
The Court's responsibility is to provide, on the basis of its audit, a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them.
TheCourt'sauditinvolvesperformingproceduresto obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the accounts and about the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying them. 
TheCourt'sauditinvolvesperformingproceduresto obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the accounts and about the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying them.
In making those risk assessments internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and presentation of accounts is considered in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. 
In making those risk assessments internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and presentation of accounts is considered in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances.
The Court's audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and, the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the accounts. 
The Court's audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and, the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts 13. 
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts 13.
In the Court's opinion, the SESAR Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regu­ lation. 
In the Court's opinion, the SESAR Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regu­ lation.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts 14. 
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts 14.
In the Court's opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year ended 31 December 2010 are, in all material respects, legal and regular. 
In the Court's opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year ended 31 December 2010 are, in all material respects, legal and regular.
ThecommentswhichfollowdonotcalltheCourt's opinions into question. 
ThecommentswhichfollowdonotcalltheCourt's opinions into question.
BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 16. 
BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 16.
Thefinal2010budgetadoptedbytheAdministrative Board included commitment appropriations of 135 million euro and payment appropriations of 143 million euro. 
Thefinal2010budgetadoptedbytheAdministrative Board included commitment appropriations of 135 million euro and payment appropriations of 143 million euro.
The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 97,3 % and 82,2 % respectively. 
The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 97,3 % and 82,2 % respectively.
In2010,thecontributionsfrommembers(55,6million euro) together with the outturn of the previous year (86,5 million euro) amounted to 142,1 million euro, against payments of 84,9 million euro and the carryover of appro­ priations of 3,7 million euro. 
In2010,thecontributionsfrommembers(55,6million euro) together with the outturn of the previous year (86,5 million euro) amounted to 142,1 million euro, against payments of 84,9 million euro and the carryover of appro­ priations of 3,7 million euro.
This led to a positive budget outturn of 53,5 million euro and deposits in bank accounts at the end of the year totalling 57,2 million euro. 
This led to a positive budget outturn of 53,5 million euro and deposits in bank accounts at the end of the year totalling 57,2 million euro.
This is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. 
This is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium.
AccordingtoArticle6oftheSESARJointUndertaking Financial Rules, no expenditure may be committed or auth­ orised in excess of the appropriations authorised by the budget. 
AccordingtoArticle6oftheSESARJointUndertaking Financial Rules, no expenditure may be committed or auth­ orised in excess of the appropriations authorised by the budget.
For two budget headings — administrative expenditure and studies and development — authorised expenditure exceeded budgetary appropriations by 11% and 9% respectively. 
For two budget headings — administrative expenditure and studies and development — authorised expenditure exceeded budgetary appropriations by 11% and 9% respectively.
OTHER MATTERS Internal control systems 19. 
OTHER MATTERS Internal control systems 19.
In 2010, the Joint Undertaking began to use the financial reporting systems also used by the Commission (ABAC and SAP). 
In 2010, the Joint Undertaking began to use the financial reporting systems also used by the Commission (ABAC and SAP).
However, the SESAR Joint Undertaking operational programme management system is not integrated into these financial reporting systems. 
However, the SESAR Joint Undertaking operational programme management system is not integrated into these financial reporting systems.
At the end of 2010, the underlying business processes had not been validated by the Accounting Officer as required by the Financial Rules of the Joint Under­ taking. 
At the end of 2010, the underlying business processes had not been validated by the Accounting Officer as required by the Financial Rules of the Joint Under­ taking.
Late payment of membership contributions 20. 
Late payment of membership contributions 20.
The deadline of 1 July 2010 for payment to the Joint Undertaking of the cash contributions for the year from its members was not respected. 
The deadline of 1 July 2010 for payment to the Joint Undertaking of the cash contributions for the year from its members was not respected.
Delays in payment ranged from 12 to 113 days. 
Delays in payment ranged from 12 to 113 days.
Two members had paid no contribution at all by the end of 2010. 
Two members had paid no contribution at all by the end of 2010.
C 368/34 Official Journal of the European Union 16.12.2011 EN Internal Audit Function and Commission Internal Audit Service 21. 
C 368/34 Official Journal of the European Union 16.12.2011 EN Internal Audit Function and Commission Internal Audit Service 21.
In its previous report, the Court pointed out the need to clarify the provision in the Statutes of the Joint Undertaking on the role of the Commission's internal auditor. 
In its previous report, the Court pointed out the need to clarify the provision in the Statutes of the Joint Undertaking on the role of the Commission's internal auditor.
While the Statutes have not been amended, the Court notes that the Commission and the Joint Undertaking have taken action to ensure a clearer definition of the respective operational roles of the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) and of the internal auditing function of the Joint Undertaking. 
While the Statutes have not been amended, the Court notes that the Commission and the Joint Undertaking have taken action to ensure a clearer definition of the respective operational roles of the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) and of the internal auditing function of the Joint Undertaking.
In line with the views expressed by the Court, the Director-General of the IAS has confirmed in a note to all EU Joint Undertakings the responsibilities of the IAS under the general Financial Regulation to act as Internal Auditor of the Joint Undertakings. 
In line with the views expressed by the Court, the Director-General of the IAS has confirmed in a note to all EU Joint Undertakings the responsibilities of the IAS under the general Financial Regulation to act as Internal Auditor of the Joint Undertakings.
The Administrative Board of the SESAR Joint Undertaking has modified the charter of its internal auditing function accordingly. 
The Administrative Board of the SESAR Joint Undertaking has modified the charter of its internal auditing function accordingly.
This report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mr Harald NOACK, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 12 October 2011. 
This report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mr Harald NOACK, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 12 October 2011.
EN 16.12.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C368/35 Areas of EU competence deriving from the Treaty (Article 187) Competences of the Joint Undertaking (Council Regulation (EC) 219/2007, as last modified by Council Regulation (EC) 1361/2008) ANNEX SESAR Joint Undertaking (Brussels) Competences and activities Research and technological development and space. 
EN 16.12.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C368/35 Areas of EU competence deriving from the Treaty (Article 187) Competences of the Joint Undertaking (Council Regulation (EC) 219/2007, as last modified by Council Regulation (EC) 1361/2008) ANNEX SESAR Joint Undertaking (Brussels) Competences and activities Research and technological development and space.
Efficient execution of EU research, technological development and demonstration programmes. 
Efficient execution of EU research, technological development and demonstration programmes.
Main objectives The aim of the SESAR Joint Undertaking shall be to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic management system by coordinating and concentrating all relevant research and development efforts in the EU. 
Main objectives The aim of the SESAR Joint Undertaking shall be to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic management system by coordinating and concentrating all relevant research and development efforts in the EU.