natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 14.12.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C338/117 Areas of Union competence Competences of the Authority as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No deriving from the Treaty 1321/2004 and as amended by European Parliament and Council Regulation Governance Resources made available to the Authority in 2009 (Data for 2008) Products and services in 2009 Competitive-ness forObjectives Tasks 1 — Administrative Board Budget Programmes growth and employment. — To manage the public interests relating to the European GNSS programmes. 
EN 14.12.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C338/117 Areas of Union competence Competences of the Authority as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No deriving from the Treaty 1321/2004 and as amended by European Parliament and Council Regulation Governance Resources made available to the Authority in 2009 (Data for 2008) Products and services in 2009 Competitive-ness forObjectives Tasks 1 — Administrative Board Budget Programmes growth and employment. — To manage the public interests relating to the European GNSS programmes.
The Authority shall: Composition 44,4 million euro (125,0 million euro), of which 7,4 million euro (10,6 million euro) was the operating subsidy from the Commission and 37,0 million euro (114,4 million euro) was operational funds from the Commission — Support to the European Commission in the implementation of the EGNOS and Galileo programmes. 
The Authority shall: Composition 44,4 million euro (125,0 million euro), of which 7,4 million euro (10,6 million euro) was the operating subsidy from the Commission and 37,0 million euro (114,4 million euro) was operational funds from the Commission — Support to the European Commission in the implementation of the EGNOS and Galileo programmes.
Source: Information supplied by the Authority. — To be the regulatory authority for the European GNSS programmes. (b) contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; — one representative from the Commission. 
Source: Information supplied by the Authority. — To be the regulatory authority for the European GNSS programmes. (b) contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; — one representative from the Commission.
Systems Security (EC) No 683/2008 (a) ensure security accreditation and the operation of the Galileo security centre; — one representative per Member State, (c) accomplish other tasks that may be entrusted to it by the Commission. — adopts the annual work programme, Staff at 31 December 2009 Tasks — Galileo and EGNOS Systems Security (Galileo Security Accreditation, System Safety and Security Committee — 3SC, GNSS Security Requirements, EGNOS Security), Table European GNSS Supervisory Authority (Brussels) — appoints the Director, — adopts the budget, — Public Regulated Service — PRS (Preparation of the PRS User Segment), — adopts the annual report on the activities and prospects of the Authority. 
Systems Security (EC) No 683/2008 (a) ensure security accreditation and the operation of the Galileo security centre; — one representative per Member State, (c) accomplish other tasks that may be entrusted to it by the Commission. — adopts the annual work programme, Staff at 31 December 2009 Tasks — Galileo and EGNOS Systems Security (Galileo Security Accreditation, System Safety and Security Committee — 3SC, GNSS Security Requirements, EGNOS Security), Table European GNSS Supervisory Authority (Brussels) — appoints the Director, — adopts the budget, — Public Regulated Service — PRS (Preparation of the PRS User Segment), — adopts the annual report on the activities and prospects of the Authority.
23 (50) establishment plan posts, of which filled: 23 (49) + 12 (3) other staff (contract staff and seconded national staff) — Galileo Security Monitoring Centre — GSMC, — GNSS Technology Control Regime. 
23 (50) establishment plan posts, of which filled: 23 (49) + 12 (3) other staff (contract staff and seconded national staff) — Galileo Security Monitoring Centre — GSMC, — GNSS Technology Control Regime.
2 — Executive Director Market development Appointed by the Adminis­ trative Board. 
2 — Executive Director Market development Appointed by the Adminis­ trative Board.
Number of staff: — — — EGNOS Market Entry (Aviation, Agriculture, Road, EDAS, Market Monitoring), 3 — System Safety and Security Committee 35 (52), of which assigned to: International activities (Latin America, Israel, China, Africa), Composed of one represen­ tative per Member State and one representative from the Commission. — operational tasks: 14 (31), Information and Outreach (EGNOS Information Portal, ‘Growing Galileo 2009’ event). 
Number of staff: — — — EGNOS Market Entry (Aviation, Agriculture, Road, EDAS, Market Monitoring), 3 — System Safety and Security Committee 35 (52), of which assigned to: International activities (Latin America, Israel, China, Africa), Composed of one represen­ tative per Member State and one representative from the Commission. — operational tasks: 14 (31), Information and Outreach (EGNOS Information Portal, ‘Growing Galileo 2009’ event).
4 — External audit — mixed tasks: 9 (8). 
4 — External audit — mixed tasks: 9 (8).
28 temporary staff were Research and development Court of Auditors. transferred to the European Commission (DG TREN) in January 2009, which left the GSA with 22 temporary staff. — Management of projects under the 6th Framework Programme and 7th Framework Programme (1st and 2nd calls) for research, 5 — Discharge authority Parliament, acting on a recommendation from the Council. — Implementation/update of a web-based knowledge management and dissemination tool. — administrative tasks: 12 (13), 
28 temporary staff were Research and development Court of Auditors. transferred to the European Commission (DG TREN) in January 2009, which left the GSA with 22 temporary staff. — Management of projects under the 6th Framework Programme and 7th Framework Programme (1st and 2nd calls) for research, 5 — Discharge authority Parliament, acting on a recommendation from the Council. — Implementation/update of a web-based knowledge management and dissemination tool. — administrative tasks: 12 (13),
EN C 338/118 Official Journal of the European Union 14.12.2010 THE AUTHORITY’S REPLIES 13. 
EN C 338/118 Official Journal of the European Union 14.12.2010 THE AUTHORITY’S REPLIES 13.
The Authority is of the opinion that the transparency of the recruitment procedures was ensured, even if the thresholds the candidates had to meet for being invited to the written tests and interviews were established after the beginning of the evaluation process. 
The Authority is of the opinion that the transparency of the recruitment procedures was ensured, even if the thresholds the candidates had to meet for being invited to the written tests and interviews were established after the beginning of the evaluation process.
The principle of sound financial management requires that the Authority invites for interview only a reasonable number of candidates. 
The principle of sound financial management requires that the Authority invites for interview only a reasonable number of candidates.
The number of candidates to be invited is a result of the ranking established and documented by the selection panel. 
The number of candidates to be invited is a result of the ranking established and documented by the selection panel.
The winner of this recruitment competition was an internal candidate who at the time of the recruitment was performing the majority of the tasks of the job, due to the departure of the former job holder. 
The winner of this recruitment competition was an internal candidate who at the time of the recruitment was performing the majority of the tasks of the job, due to the departure of the former job holder.
Notwithstanding the demonstration of his competences on the job, the candidate had to compete with external candidates in an open and fair competition. 
Notwithstanding the demonstration of his competences on the job, the candidate had to compete with external candidates in an open and fair competition.
The appointment decision grants a reduction in experience of 4 months and is reasoned with the fact that the candidate is experienced in GSA financial practices and that he has been already performing many of the tasks of the job. 
The appointment decision grants a reduction in experience of 4 months and is reasoned with the fact that the candidate is experienced in GSA financial practices and that he has been already performing many of the tasks of the job.
The Director issued in 2010 a general decision on a reduction of 10 % professional experience, which since its issue is published with the vacancy notice. 
The Director issued in 2010 a general decision on a reduction of 10 % professional experience, which since its issue is published with the vacancy notice.
The Authority has followed the rules defined by the Commission. 
The Authority has followed the rules defined by the Commission.
In particular: (a) all criteria were published either in the Guide for Applicants or in the detailed topic description (including the SME requirement, benchmarks for evaluation and the funding levels); (b) the evaluation and ranking process was fully conforming to Commission's FP7 guidelines and, accordingly, all the information was available to participants. 
In particular: (a) all criteria were published either in the Guide for Applicants or in the detailed topic description (including the SME requirement, benchmarks for evaluation and the funding levels); (b) the evaluation and ranking process was fully conforming to Commission's FP7 guidelines and, accordingly, all the information was available to participants.
The 3rd Amending Budget (Official Journal of the European Union of 31 March 2010) reflected an amendment adopted by the Administrative Board in December 2009; it entailed reduction of the staff expenditure by 450 000 euro and the increase of the budget for studies by the same amount in payment appropriations only. 
The 3rd Amending Budget (Official Journal of the European Union of 31 March 2010) reflected an amendment adopted by the Administrative Board in December 2009; it entailed reduction of the staff expenditure by 450 000 euro and the increase of the budget for studies by the same amount in payment appropriations only.
This amendment did not affect the revenue side. 
This amendment did not affect the revenue side.
Accordingly, the template of the Publications Office that was used had no revenues because these were unchanged compared to the previous published version of Budget 2009. 
Accordingly, the template of the Publications Office that was used had no revenues because these were unchanged compared to the previous published version of Budget 2009.
EN C 366/112 Official Journal of the European Union 15.12.2011 REPORT on the annual accounts of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2010, together with the Agency’s replies INTRODUCTION 1. 
FI C 366/112 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti 15.12.2011 KERTOMUS Euroopan GNSS-viraston tilinpäätöksestä varainhoitovuodelta 2010 sekä viraston vastaukset (2011/C 366/20) JOHDANTO 1.
TheEuropeanGNSS(GlobalNavigationSatelliteSystem) Agency (hereinafter ‘the Agency’), which is located in Brussels, was set up by Council Regulation (EC) No1321/2004 of 12 July 2004 (1) to manage the public interests relating to the European GNSS programmes and to act as the regulatory agency for the programme during the deployment and oper­ ational phases of the Galileo Programme. 
EuroopanGNSS-virasto(jäljempänä’virasto’)perustettiin 12 päivänä heinäkuuta 2004 annetulla neuvoston asetuksella (EY) N:o1321/2004(1). Brysselissä sijaitsevan viraston tehtä­ vänä on huolehtia eurooppalaisiin GNSS-ohjelmiin (Global Na­ vigation Satellite System) liittyvien julkisten etujen valvonnasta ja toimia ohjelman sääntelyviranomaisena Galileo-ohjelman käyttöönotto-ja käyttövaiheessa.
Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 (2) reduced the responsibilities of the Agency to the control of the security of Galileo systems and to the prep­ aration of their commercialisation. 
Euroopan parlamentin ja neu­ voston 9 päivänä heinäkuuta 2008 antamalla asetuksella (EY) N:o 683/2008 (2) rajoitettiin viraston vastuu Galileo-järjestel­ mien turvallisuuden valvontaan ja niiden kaupallistamisen val­ misteluun.
The Agency was previously known, until 2010, as the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (3). 
Virasto tunnettiin vuoteen 2010 saakka nimellä eu­ rooppalaisen GNSS-järjestelmän valvontaviranomainen (3).
TheAgency’s2010adoptedbudgetamountedto15,9 million euro, compared with 44,4 million euro the previous year. 
Virastontalousarviooli15,9miljoonaaeuroavarainhoi­ tovuonna 2010, kun se edellisenä vuonna oli 44,4 miljoonaa euroa.
The number of staff employed by the Agency at the end of the year was 42, compared with 35 the previous year. 
Virastossa työskenteli vuoden lopussa 42 henkilöä, edel­ lisenä vuonna henkilöstön määrä oli 35.
(2011/C 366/20) The Director’s responsibility 5. 
Toiminnanjohtajan vastuu 5.
Asauthorisingofficer,theDirectorimplementsthe revenue and expenditure of the budget in accordance with the financial rules of the Agency, under his own responsi­ bility and within the limits of the authorised appro­ priations (8). 
Tulojenjamenojenhyväksyjänätoiminnanjohtajato­ teuttaa tulot ja menot sisältävää talousarviota viraston va­ rainhoitoa koskevien säännösten mukaisesti omalla vastuul­ laan ja hyväksyttyjen määrärahojen rajoissa (8).
The Director is responsible for putting in place (9) the organisational structure and the internal management and control systems and procedures relevant for drawing up final accounts (10) that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and for ensuring that the transactions underlying those accounts are legal and regular. 
Toiminnan­ johtajan vastuulla on kehittää(9) sellainen organisaatiora­ kenne sekä sisäiset hallintoja valvontajärjestelmät ja -me­ nettelyt, joiden pohjalta on toisaalta mahdollista laatia tilin­ päätös (10), jossa ei ole petoksesta tai virheestä johtuvia olen­ naisesti virheellisiä tietoja, ja toisaalta varmistaa tilien perus­ tana olevien toimien laillisuus ja asianmukaisuus.
(2) OJ L 196, 24.7.2008, p. 
(2) EUVL L 196, 24.7.2008, s.
(10) The rules concerning the presentation of the accounts and accounting by the Agencies are laid down in Chapter 1 of Title VII of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 as last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 652/2008 (OJ L 181, 10.7.2008, p. 
(10) Erillisvirastojen tilinpäätöksiä ja kirjanpitoa koskevat säännöt on esitetty asetuksen (EY, Euratom) N:o 2343/2002 VII osaston 1 lu­ vussa. Asetusta on viimeksi muutettu asetuksella (EY, Euratom) N:o 652/2008 (EUVL L 181, 10.7.2008, s. 23).
23) and are integrated as such in the Financial Regulation of the Agency. 
Säännöt on liitetty sellaisenaan viraston varainhoitoasetukseen.
EN 15.12.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C366/113 the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the accounts. 
FI 15.12.2011 Euroopanunioninvirallinenlehti C366/113 Tilintarkastustuomioistuimen tarkastuksen yhteydessä arvioi­ daan myös sovellettujen tilinpäätösperiaatteiden ja johdon esittämien kirjanpidollisten arvioiden asianmukaisuutta sekä tilinpäätöksen yleistä esittämistapaa.
The Court believes that the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for its qualified opinion on the reliability of the accounts and its opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts. 
Tilintarkastustuomioistuinkatsoo,ettäsaatutodentava aineisto on riittävä ja sopiva huomautuksia sisältävälle tar­ kastuslausumalle tilien luotettavuudesta sekä lausumalle ti­ lien perustana olevien toimien laillisuudesta ja asianmukai­ suudesta.
Basis for a qualified opinion on the reliability of the accounts 10. 
Perusteet huomautuksia sisältävälle lausumalle tilien luo­ tettavuudesta 10.
During2010theAgencypurchasedtangiblefixed assets (12) related to the Galileo programme (13) in the amount of 4,4 million euro. 
Virastohankkivuoden2010aikanaaineellistakäyt­ töomaisuutta (12) Galileo-ohjelmaan (13) liittyen yhteensä 4,4 miljoonan euron arvosta.
These assets are due to be transferred by the Agency to the European Commission. 
Viraston on määrä siirtää asian­ omaiset omaisuuserät Euroopan komissiolle.
These assets have been recorded as research expenditure but should have instead been classified as assets held for transfer. 
Omaisuuserät on kirjattu tutkimusmenoihin, vaikka ne olisi pitänyt luoki­ tella siirrettäväksi varallisuudeksi.
The result of this transaction is an understatement of assets in the amount of 4,4 million euro and an under­ statement of the economic outturn account by the same amount. 
Tämän seurauksena käyttö­ omaisuuden määrä on ilmoitettu 4,4 miljoonaa euroa liian pienenä ja myös tuloslaskelma saman verran liian pienenä.
Qualified opinion on the reliability of the accounts 11. 
Huomautuksia sisältävä lausuma tilien luotettavuudesta 11.
In the Court’s opinion, except for the effect of the matter described in paragraph 10, the Agency’s Annual Accounts (14) fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regu­ lation. 
Tilintarkastustuomioistuinkatsoo,ettävirastontilin­ päätös (14) antaa kohdassa 10 kuvatun tilanteen vaikutusta lukuun ottamatta olennaisilta osiltaan oikeat ja riittävät tie­ dot viraston taloudellisesta asemasta 31. päivältä joulukuuta 2010 sekä toimien tuloksista ja rahavirroista päättyneeltä varainhoitovuodelta viraston varainhoitoa koskevien sään­ nösten mukaisesti.
Opinion on the legality and the regularity of the trans­ actions underlying the accounts 12. 
Lausuma tilien perustana olevien toimien laillisuudesta ja asianmukaisuudesta 12.
BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 14. 
TALOUSARVIO-JA VARAINHALLINTOA KOSKEVAT HUO­ MAUTUKSET 14.
AsregardstheSeventhFrameworkProgramme/Galileo/ Second Call grant procedures with a budget of 26 million euro, the evaluation process did not clearly distinguish between selection and award criteria. 
Seitsemänteen puiteohjelmaan liittyvien, Galileo-ohjel­ man toiseen ehdotuspyyntöön perustuvien avustusmenettelyiden (talousarvio 26 miljoonaa euroa) yhteydessä sovelletussa arvi­ ointiprosessissa ei tehty selvää eroa valinta-ja ratkaisuperustei­ den välillä.
Criteria for assessing the applicants’ financial capacity were not defined. 
Hakijoiden taloudellisten valmiuksien arviointiperus­ teita ei määritetty.
Although the status of the applicant determined the maximum reimbursement rate, such status was not verified by the Agency. 
Avustuksen enimmäisosuus vahvistetaan ha­ kijan aseman perusteella, mutta virasto ei tarkistanut hakijoiden asemaa.
AsregardstheSixthFrameworkProgramme(FP6)/Third Call, in two grant agreements audited, the cost claims submitted by the beneficiaries were based on standard rates, instead of actual costs. 
Kuudenteenpuiteohjelmaanliittyvänkolmannenehdo­ tuspyynnön osalta havaittiin, että kahden tarkastetun avustusso­ pimuksen tapauksessa edunsaajien toimittamat menoilmoitukset eivät perustuneet todellisiin menoihin vaan olivat vakiomääräi­ siä.
This was not in compliance with the non-profit principle for EU financial contributions. 
Tämä on vastoin periaatetta, jonka mukaan EU:n rahoi­ tusosuuksien tarkoituksena ei saa olla voiton tuottaminen.
Five audited grants, related mainly to the Sixth Framework Programme, showed delays of between one and three years for their implementation. 
Viidessätarkastetussaavustuksessa,jotkaliittyivätlähinnä kuudenteen puiteohjelmaan, havaittiin täytäntöönpanoviiveitä, joiden kesto vaihteli yhden ja kolmen vuoden välillä.
Successive increases in the initial value of the contracts were noted. 
Sopimus­ ten arvon havaittiin vähitellen kasvaneen alkuperäisestä mää­ rästä.
Following the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, most of the activities and assets related to the EGNOS and Galileo programmes were transferred to the Commission in December 2009. 
Asetuksen (EY) N:o683/2008 voimaantulon jälkeen useimmat EGNOS-ja Galileo-ohjelmiin liittyvät toimet ja omai­ suuserät siirrettiin komissiolle joulukuussa 2009.
At 31 December 2010, the status of 2 million euro held by the Agency in respect of technical support from the European Space Agency had still to be determined. 
Viraston hal­ lussa ollutta, Euroopan avaruusjärjestöltä saatavaan tekniseen tukeen liittyvää kahden miljoonan euron erää koskeva tilanne oli määrittämättä vielä 31. joulukuuta 2010.
Inthestaffselectionproceduresaudited,thresholdscores were not determined for admission to written tests and interviews or for inclusion in the list of suitable candidates. 
Tarkastettujenhenkilöstönvalintamenettelyidenyhtey­ dessä ei määritetty pisterajoja, jotka ehdokkaiden oli saavutet­ tava saadakseen kutsun kirjallisiin kokeisiin ja haastatteluihin tai tullakseen merkityksi varallaololuetteloon.
These practices jeopardised the transparency of the recruitment procedures. 
Tällaiset käytännöt vaaransivat rekrytointimenettelyjen avoimuuden.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President (12) Satellite magnetotorquers, satellite propulsion thrusters, satellite fuel tanks (In Orbit Validation) and ground rubidium atomic clocks (Full Operational Capability). 
Tilintarkastustuomioistuimen puolesta Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA presidentti (12) Satelliitin magneettivääntimet, satelliitin moottorit, satelliitin poltto­ ainesäiliöt (käytetään lentotestauksessa) ja maassa olevat rubidium-atomikellot (täyden operationaalisen kyvyn omaava lennon maaseg­ mentti).
(13) Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 on the further implementation of European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). 
(13) Asetus (EY) N:o 683/2008) eurooppalaisten satelliittinavigointiohjel­ mien (EGNOS ja Galileo) toteuttamisesta.
(14) The Final Annual Accounts were drawn up on 16 September 2011 and received by the Court on 3 October 2011. 
(14) Lopullinen tilinpäätös laadittiin 16. syyskuuta 2011 ja tilintarkas­ tustuomioistuin vastaanotti sen 3. lokakuuta 2011.
The Final Annual Accounts can be found on the following website http://eca.europa.eu or http://www.gsa.europa.eu 
Lopullinen tilin­ päätös esitetään sivustoilla http://eca.europa.eu ja http://www.gsa.europa.eu.
C 366/114 Official Journal of the European Union 15.12.2011 EN Areas of Union competence deriving from the Treaty Competences of the Agency (Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010) ANNEX European GNSS Agency (Brussels) Competences and activities — Competitiveness for growth and employment. 
C 366/114 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti 15.12.2011 FI Perussopimuksen mukainen unionin toimivalta Viraston toimivaltuudet (Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus (EU) N:o 912/2010, annettu 22 päivänä syyskuuta 2010) LIITE Еuroopan GNSS-virasto (Bryssel) Vastuualueet ja toiminnot — Kasvua ja työllisyyttä tukeva kilpailukyky.
Objectives — To manage the public interests relating to the European GNSS programmes. — To be the regulatory agency for the European GNSS programmes. 
Tavoitteet — Hallinnoida eurooppalaisiin GNSS-ohjelmiin liittyviä julkisia etuja — toimia eurooppalaisten GNSS-ohjelmien sääntelyvirastona.
Tasks The Agency shall: (a) ensure security accreditation and the operation of the Galileo security centre; (b) contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; (c) accomplish other tasks that may be entrusted to it by the Commission. 
Tehtävät Viraston on a. varmistettava turvallisuusjärjestelyjen hyväksyminen ja Galileon turvallisuuskeskuk­ sen toiminta b. edistettävä järjestelmien kaupallistamisen valmistelua, mukaan lukien tarvittava markkina-analyysi c. suoritettava muita komission sille osoittamia tehtäviä.