natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this case, the Commission takes the view that the investment aid does not lead to such a duplication which would diminish the medium-term prospects for the use of existing infrastructure at other, neighbouring airports.
I S. 1861), viimeksi muutettu 7 päivänä syyskuuta 2007 annetun lain (BGBl.
Indeed, there are no other airports within 100 kilometres or 60 minutes travelling time from Frankfurt Hahn airport.
I, s. 2246) 8 §:llä.
The closest airports to Frankfurt Hahn are Frankfurt Main airport, which is located at 115 kilometres distance or 1 hour 15 minutes traveling time by car, and Luxembourg airport, which is located 1 hour and 30 minutes travelling time (111 kilometres) away.
Flughafen Frankfurt Hahn – Regionalökonomische Effekte, ZFL Studie, 03/2007.
Frankfurt Main airport is an international hub airport with a wide variety of destinations and is predominantly served by network carriers offering connecting traffic, whereas Frankfurt Hahn airport serves low-cost point-to-point flights.
Saksan toimittamat tiedot, syyskuu 2014.
Traffic at Frankfurt Main airport has continuously increased since 2000, from 49,4 million passengers in 2000 to approximately 58 million in 2012.
Ryanairille laadittu Oxeran selvitys ”How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test? – Practical application” ( Miten AMS:n sopimuksia pitäisi käsitellä kannattavuusanalyysissa markkinataloustoimijatestin yhteydessä – Soveltaminen käytäntöön), 31 päivänä tammikuuta 2014.
However, during that period growth has been affected by congestion problems and capacity constraints.
Se selvensi, että vuosien 1999 ja 2004 arvioita on mukautettu siten, että ne vastaavat vuoden 1999 sopimuksen alkamispäivää huhtikuussa 1999 ja päättymispäivää maaliskuussa 2004.
As pointed out by Germany, the capacity limits of Frankfurt Main airport were constantly exceeded.
Oxera selvensi, että poistot on mallinnettu nettonykyarvoneutraalisti.
Therefore, according to Germany, especially in the light of its 24 hour operating licence, Frankfurt Hahn airport played an important role in providing additional capacity in order to relieve the congestion at Frankfurt Main airport.
Oxeran mukaan näin varmistettiin, että poistojen diskontattu nykyarvo omaisuuserän käyttöaikana vastaa pääomamenojen alkuperäistä määrää.
In fact, until 2009 Fraport was the majority shareholder of FFHG, the operator of Frankfurt Hahn airport (2,7 million passengers in 2013, around 4 million passengers in 2007 at its peak) and the operator of Frankfurt-Main airport (58 million passengers and 2,1 million freight), and was as such pursuing a diversification strategy.
Oxera totesi, että tiedot esitetään nimellisinä.
Luxembourg airport, which is the nearest airport to Frankfurt Hahn but still around 111 kilometres or 1 hour 30 minutes traveling time by car away, had around 1,7 million passengers in 2008 and experienced a rapid growth to 2,2 million in 2013.
Se selvensi, että vuosien 2002 ja 2017 arvioita on mukautettu siten, että ne vastaavat Ryanairin vuoden 2002 sopimuksen alkamispäivää helmikuussa 2002 ja päättymispäivää helmikuussa 2017.
Even though Luxembourg airport is slightly smaller than Frankfurt Hahn airport in terms of passenger traffic, its freight activity is substantially larger with 674000 tonnes in 2013.
Asiat T-228/99 ja T-233/99, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v. komissio, tuomio 6.3.2003 (Kok., s. II-435, 314 kohta).
It offers a variety of scheduled flights to European capitals and charter flights to leisure destinations.
Tuomio Stardust Marine, 33 ja 34 kohta.
That selection of destinations to a large extent meets the needs of the employees of the financial and international institutions located in Luxembourg.
Komission direktiivi 2006/111/EY, annettu 16 päivänä marraskuuta 2006, jäsenvaltioiden ja julkisten yritysten välisten taloudellisten suhteiden avoimuudesta sekä tiettyjen yritysten taloudellisen toiminnan avoimuudesta (EUVL L 318, 17.11.2006, s. 17).
Saarbrücken airport is located around 128 kilometres away from Frankfurt Hahn airport which amounts to over 2 hours traveling time by car.
Asia T-196/04, Ryanair v. komissio, tuomio 17.12.2008 (Kok., s. II-3643), jäljempänä ’tuomio Charleroi’.
In addition, Frankfurt Hahn is served mainly by low-cost carriers (Ryanair) and freight constitutes a rather important element in its business model whereas Saarbrücken airport offers mainly scheduled flights to national destinations and has only limited air freight transport.
Vuoden 2005 markkinointisopimusta ei käsitelty myöskään menettelyn aloittamista koskevassa vuoden 2011 päätöksessä.
With regard to Zweibrücken airport, Germany emphasised that the distance of 127 km to Frankfurt Hahn airport translates into a travelling time of 1 hour and 27 minutes by car or around 4 hours by train.
Asia T-128/98, Aéroports de Paris v. komissio, tuomio 12.12.2000 (Kok., s. II-3929), vahvistettu asiassa C-82/01 P, Aéroports de Paris v. komissio, tuomio 24.10.2002 (Kok., s. I-9297, 75 kohta sekä muut viittaukset).
Moreover, Germany submitted that, looking at passenger and air freight traffic between 2005 and 2012, no relationship of substitution between the airports can be deduced.
Asia T-455/08, Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH ja Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG v. komissio, tuomio 24.3.2011 (Kok., s. I-00000, erityisesti 105 ja 106 kohta).
The Commission observes that there is a certain overlap in the activities of both Frankfurt Hahn and Zweibrücken airports, as Zweibrücken airport also engaged in handling air freight and the destinations served by Zweibrücken airport are predominantly for charter traffic.
Ks. erityisesti komission päätös asiassa C-29/08, annettu 17 päivänä kesäkuuta 2008, Frankfurt-Hahnin lentoasema – mahdollinen valtiontuki lentoasemalle ja sopimus Ryanairin kanssa (EUVL C 12, 17.1.2009, s. 6), johdanto-osan 204–208 kappale; komission päätös asiassa C 76/2002, annettu 21 päivänä maaliskuuta 2012, Charleroin lentoasema – mahdollinen valtiontuki lentoasemalle ja Ryanairille (EUVL C 248, 17.8.2012, s. 1).
In that regard, the Commission notes that freight is usually more mobile than passenger transport [130].
Asetuksen (EY) N:o 659/1999 1 artiklan d alakohdan mukaan ”tukiohjelmalla” tarkoitetaan ”säädöstä tai päätöstä, jonka perusteella yksittäisiä tukia voidaan myöntää yrityksille, jotka määritellään säädöksessä tai päätöksessä yleisesti ja käsitteellisesti ilman, että edellytetään muita täytäntöönpanotoimenpiteitä, sekä säädöstä tai päätöstä, jonka perusteella erityiseen hankkeeseen liittymätöntä tukea voidaan myöntää yhdelle tai useammalle yritykselle toistaiseksi ja/tai rajoittamaton määrä”.
Comments from the industry suggest that up to a half-day of trucking time (that is to say, up to 12 hours driving time by trucks) would in general be acceptable for freight forwarders to transport their goods [131].
FFHG:n tilanneselvitys 2002, s. 5.
Moreover, charter traffic is also, in general, less time sensitive and may accept traveling times of up to 2 hours by car.
Asia C-482/99, Ranska v. komissio (Stardust Marine), tuomio 16.5.2002 (Kok., s. I-4397).
At the same time it should be noted that, before Zweibrücken entered the market in 2006, Frankfurt Hahn airport was already a well-established airport with more than 3 million passengers and channelling 123000 tonnes of freight.
Yhdistetyt asiat T-267/08 ja T-279/08, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, tuomio 12.5.2011 (ei vielä julkaistu oikeustapauskokoelmassa, 108 kohta).
In view of the historical development of the two airports, their geographical location and the free capacity available at Frankfurt Hahn airport at the time when Zweibrücken airport entered the commercial aviation market in 2006, the Commission concludes that it is rather the opening of Zweibrücken airport which constituted an unnecessary duplication of infrastructure.
Ks. esimerkiksi komission päätös C 41/2005, Hukkakustannukset Unkarissa (EUVL C 324, 21.12.2005, s. 12), sekä muut viittaukset.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that the investments into Frankfurt Hahn airport do not constitute a duplication of existing non-profitable infrastructure.
Tuomio Stardust Marine, 52 ja 57 kohta.
On the contrary, Frankfurt Hahn airport has played an important role in decongesting Frankfurt Main airport without limiting the latter's plans to expand.
Hessenin osavaltio omisti 45,24 prosenttia Fraportin osakkeista, Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main Holding GmbH (joka oli kokonaan Frankfurt am Mainin kunnan omistuksessa) 28,89 prosenttia ja Saksan liittotasavalta 25,87 prosenttia.
Without the investments into Frankfurt Hahn airport there was in fact a risk that the region would be underserved in terms of its transport needs.
Tuomio Stardust Marine, 55 ja 56 kohta.
In the light of the considerations in recitals 512 to 523, the Commission therefore concludes that the investment aid directed at the construction and operation of infrastructure at Frankfurt Hahn airport meets a clearly defined objective of common interest, namely regional economic development, creation of jobs and improvement of the accessibility of the region.
Asia T-442/03, SIC – Sociedade Independente de Comunicação v. komissio, tuomio 26.6.2008 (Kok., s. II-1161, 100 kohta).
According to Germany, the investments were undertaken according to the needs (and were thus proportionate) and the constructed infrastructure was necessary for the airport in order to serve the connectivity and the development of the region and to decongest Frankfurt Main airport.
Rikoslain (Strafgesetzbuch) 11 §:n 1 momentin 2 kohdan c alakohta.
Based on the information provided by Germany, the Commission agrees that the financed investments were necessary and proportionate to the objective of common interest.
Ks. Fraportin vuosien 2001–2006 tilinpäätöstiedot (Geschäftsbericht), jotka on julkaistu osoitteessa http://www.fraport.de/de/investor-relations/termine-und-publikationen/publikationen.html.
Indeed, without those investments the conversion of the former U.S. base into a fully functioning civil aviation airport could not have been completed.
Ks. erityisesti Geschäftsbericht 2001, s. 46; Geschäftsbericht 2002, s. 66; Geschäftsbericht 2003, s. 54; Geschäftsbericht 2004, s. 80; Geschäftsbericht 2005, s. 64; Geschäftsbericht 2006, s. 72.
The construction of passenger and freight facilities, aprons and modernisation of taxiways had to be carried out in order to further develop civil flight operations.
Fraportin ja Rheinland-Pfalzin osavaltion välinen perussopimus, tehty 31 päivänä elokuuta 1999.
Hence, the constructed infrastructure was necessary for the airport in order to serve the connectivity and the development of the region.
Perussopimuksen tekeminen hyväksyttiin hallintoneuvoston kokouksessa 1 päivänä lokakuuta 1999.
Also, the infrastructure project was undertaken only to the extent it was necessary to attain the goals set: while the infrastructure was built for a maximum passenger traffic of around 4 to 5 million passengers and 500000 tonnes of freight, the traffic statistics displayed in Tables 1 and 2 show that the passenger traffic steadily increased until 2007 to reach a record of 4 million passengers (following by a decline to 2,7 million in 2013 for the reasons set out in recital 532) and that the freight volume increased to more than 500000 tonnes of freight in 2011.
Fraportin ja Rheinland-Pfalzin osavaltion välinen perussopimus, tehty 31 päivänä elokuuta 1999, ks. 4 ja 5 kohta.
This means that the expected traffic demand largely corresponded to the actual demand and that the investments were not disproportionately large.
FFHG:n yhtiöjärjestys, tehty 29 päivänä marraskuuta 2001, 13 § ”Verfügung über Geschäftsanteile” (osakkeista määrääminen).
While it is important to avoid that the investment constitutes a duplication of an existing unprofitable infrastructure, that is not the case here.
Hallintoneuvoston hankintakomitean 30 päivänä toukokuuta 2001 pidetyn kokouksen pöytäkirja.
As already explained in recitals 516 to 523, there are no other airports within 100 kilometres distance and 60 minutes travelling time, and even if a wider catchment area was to be considered there are no duplications effects.
Hallituksen (Vorstandsvorlage) toimittamat asiakirjat FFHG:n taloudellisesta kehityksestä, 14 päivänä toukokuuta 2001; ks. myös hallintoneuvoston hankintakomitean 30 päivänä toukokuuta 2001 pidetyn kokouksen pöytäkirja; ks. myös BCG:n analyysi FFHG:n potentiaalista, 14 päivänä helmikuuta 2001, s. 10.
The closest airport is Frankfurt Main airport, which Frankfurt Hahn airport was intended to decongest.
Fraportin hallintoneuvostoa varten laadittu päätösehdotus, 23 päivänä marraskuuta 2001.
In the light of those considerations, the Commission considers that this compatibility condition is met.
Asia C-39/94, Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) ym. v. La Poste ym., tuomio 11.7.1996 (Kok., s. I-3547, 60 kohta) ja asia C-342/96, Espanjan kuningaskunta v. Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio, tuomio 29.4.1999 (Kok., s. I-2459, 41 kohta).
Germany submitted that before the decision to further develop the airport infrastructure was taken, traffic forecast studies were conducted by external experts in order to identify the traffic potential for Frankfurt Hahn airport.
Asia 173/73, Italian tasavalta v. Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio, tuomio 2.7.1974 (Kok., s. 709, 13 kohta).
The information submitted shows that at that time the external experts forecasted significant growth from 0,3 million passengers in 2000 to up to 3,8 million passengers by 2010 (see Figures 2, 3 and 4).
Asia C-482/99, Ranska v. komissio (Stardust Marine), tuomio 16.5.2002 (Kok., s. I-4397, 69 kohta).
With regard to freight development, the experts projected a development from 151000 tonnes in 2001 to up to 386000 tonnes in 2010 (see Figure 5), with the growth in the freight business between 2006 and 2010 coming from the freight flights diverted from Frankfurt Main airport due to curfew.
Asia C-305/89, Italia v. komissio (Alfa Romeo), tuomio 21.3.1991 (Kok., s. I-1603, 23 kohta) ja asia T-296/97, Alitalia v. komissio, tuomio 12.12.2000 (Kok., s. II-3871, 84 kohta).
However, those projections could only be fulfilled if the investments were undertaken to the planned extent.
Asia C-40/85, Belgia v. komissio, tuomio 10.7.1986 (Kok., s. I-2321).
The Commission notes that those traffic forecasts (see recital 531) were confirmed by the actual traffic development at Frankfurt Hahn airport (see Tables 1 and 2).
Tuomio Stardust Marine, 71 kohta.
In 2007 Frankfurt Hahn airport served around 4 million passengers.
Asia C-124/10 P, Euroopan komissio v. Électricité de France (EDF), tuomio 5.6.2012 (ei vielä julkaistu oikeustapauskokoelmassa, 85 kohta).
Following a period of significant growth, air traffic in Germany and the Union in recent years has been negatively affected by the economic and financial crisis in 2008/09, which resulted in a decrease in passenger air transport in Germany in 2009.
Interplan oli konsulttiyritys, jonka Fraport oli palkannut selvittämään Frankfurt-Hahnin lentoaseman liikennepotentiaalia.
The passenger development at Frankfurt Hahn airport was further impacted by the introduction of an air passenger tax in Germany in 2011.
FFHG:n hallintoneuvoston hankintakomitean 30 päivänä toukokuuta 2001 pidetyn kokouksen pöytäkirja.
Currently Frankfurt Hahn airport serves around 2,7 million passengers p.a.
Kannattavuusarviointi, BCG, 14 päivänä helmikuuta 2001.
With regard to freight, Frankfurt Hahn airport handled 565000 tonnes of freight in 2011.
Nettonykyarvon laskennassa diskonttokoron oletettiin olevan […] prosenttia.
Due to the bankruptcy of one of its clients, the airport processed only 447000 tonnes in 2013.
Nettonykyarvo ilmaisee sen, ylittävätkö tietystä hankkeesta saatavat tulot pääoman (vaihtoehto-)kustannukset.
In the light of those considerations, it can therefore be concluded that Frankfurt Hahn airport is already using most of its capacity and that the medium-term prospects for the use of the capacity were satisfactory.
Hankkeen katsotaan olevan taloudellisesti kannattava sijoitus, jos sillä on positiivinen nettonykyarvo.
All potential users of the infrastructure have access to the airport on equal and non-discriminatory terms.
Investoinnit, joiden tuotot ovat pienemmät kuin pääoman (vaihtoehto-)kustannukset, eivät ole taloudellisesti kannattavia.
Indeed, the schedule of airport charges applicable at Frankfurt Hahn airport is publicly available and open to all potential and current users of the airport in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner.
Pääoman (vaihtoehto-)kustannukset näkyvät diskonttokorossa.
Any differences in airport charges actually paid for the use of the infrastructure were based on commercially justified differentiation [132].
SH&E: Frankfurt-Hahnin lentoaseman liikennepotentiaalia koskeva tutkimus, 18 päivänä heinäkuuta 2001.
Hence, the Commission considers that this condition is satisfied.
Nykytilanne, vaihtoehto 1 ja vaihtoehto 2 perustuvat PwC:n 24 päivänä lokakuuta 2008 laatimassa selvityksessä (s. 39) annettuihin tietoihin.
According to point 39 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines the category of an airport can provide an indication of the extent to which airports are competing with one another and therefore also the extent to which public funding granted to an airport may distort competition.
Diskonttokorko määritettiin BCG:n 14 päivänä helmikuuta 2010 laatimassa potentiaaliarvioinnissa.
Within the standard catchment area of Frankfurt Hahn airport (1 hour travelling time by car or 100 kilometres distance) there are no other commercially exploited airports.
Komissio laski nettonykyarvon käyttäen […] prosentin diskonttokorkoa, joka määritettiin BCG:n kannattavuusarvioinnissa.
Even if one were to extend the catchment area, the Commission considers that the aid does not create undue negative effects on competition and trade between the Member States.
Komissio määritti lisäksi toisen vaihtoehdon eli nykytilanteen (tappioiden kattaminen vuoteen 2005 saakka).
As far as Frankfurt Main airport (the closest airport at around 115 kilometres distance and 1 hour 15 minutes travelling time) is concerned, the investments at Frankfurt Hahn airport did not result in negative substitution effects.
Diskonttokorko määritettiin PwC:n selvityksessä, 24 päivänä lokakuuta 2008, s. 33.
In fact, before getting involved in Frankfurt Hahn airport, Fraport was already the operator of Frankfurt Main airport, but was nevertheless investing into Frankfurt Hahn airport with a view to de-congesting Frankfurt Main airport as a future capacity overload was foreseeable for that hub.
Komissio laski nettonykyarvon käyttäen PwC:n selvityksessä ilmoitettua diskonttokorkoa.
In particular, the ban on night flights at Frankfurt Main airport was one of the main factors to be taken into consideration as Frankfurt Hahn airport had a 24 hour operating license.
Asia T-214/95, Het Vlaamse Gewest v. komissio, tuomio 30.4.1998 (Kok., s. II-717).
That also applies to Zweibrücken airport, given that it is rather the latter that constitutes an unnecessary duplication of infrastructure (and would thus be responsible for any distortive effect on competition).
Liègen lentoaseman vastaus vuoden 2014 ilmailusuuntaviivoja koskevaan julkiseen kuulemiseen.
In addition, contrary to Frankfurt Main and Luxembourg airports Frankfurt Hahn airport is not served by a train connection.
Saksan osakeyhtiölain 293 §:n 1 momentti.
Overall, no substitution effect on rail transport can be expected.
Komissio on laskenut kasvuprosentit vuotuisten tulosennusteiden perusteella.
In view of the considerations in recitals 536 to 541, the Commission considers that any undue negative effects on competition and trade between Member States are limited to the minimum.
Asia C-364/92, SAT Fluggesellschaft v. Eurocontrol, tuomio 19.1.1994 (Kok., s. I-43).
The Commission must establish whether the State aid granted to Frankfurt Hahn Airport has changed the behaviour of the beneficiary in such a way that it engaged in activity contributing to the achievement of the objective of common interest that (i) it would not have carried out without the aid, or (ii) it would have carried out in a more restricted or different manner.
Asia C-118/85, komissio v. Italia, tuomio 16.6.1987 (Kok., s. 2599, 7 ja 8 kohta) ja asia C-30/87, Bodson v. Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, tuomio 4.5.1988 (Kok., s. 2479, 18 kohta).
In addition, the aid is considered to be proportionate only if the same result could not be reached with less aid and less distortion.
Asia C-343/95, Calì & Figli v. Servizi ecologici porto di Genova, tuomio 18.3.1997 (Kok., s. I-1547); komission päätös N 309/2002, tehty 19 päivänä maaliskuuta 2003; komission päätös N 438/2002, tehty 16 päivänä lokakuuta 2002, Tuki satamaviranomaisille julkisten viranomaisten tehtävien suorittamiseksi Belgiassa.
That means that the amount and intensity of the aid must be limited to the minimum needed for the aided activity to take place.
Komission päätös N 309/2002, tehty 19 päivänä maaliskuuta 2003.
According to the information submitted by Germany, without the aid the investment could not have been realised.
Ks. erityisesti asia C-364/92, SAT Fluggesellschaft v. Eurocontrol, tuomio 19.1.1994 (Kok., s. I-43, 30 kohta) ja asia C-113/07 P, Selex Sistemi Integrati v. komissio, tuomio 26.3.2009 (Kok., s. I-2207, 71 kohta).
Germany submitted that the aid was necessary as it compensated only the costs of financing and a lower amount would have led to lower levels of investment.
Ks. muun muassa asia C-172/03, Wolfgang Heiser v. Finanzamt Innsbruck, tuomio 3.3.2005 (Kok., s. I-1627, 36 kohta oikeuskäytäntöviittauksineen).
Indeed, according to the financial results summarised in Tables 3 and 4 the airport is still loss-making and not able to finance its investment costs.
Asia T-196/04, Ryanair v. komissio, tuomio 17.12.2008 (Kok., s. II-3643, 59 kohta).
Therefore, it can be concluded that the aid was necessary to make investments in order to decongest the airport infrastructure and to meet the current requirements for modern airport infrastructure.
Ks. komission päätös annettu 27 päivänä tammikuuta 2010, valtiontuesta C 12/08 (ex NN 74/07) – Slovakia – Bratislavan lentoaseman ja Ryanairin välinen sopimus (EUVL L 27, 1.2.2011, s. 24).
Without the aid, Frankfurt Hahn airport would not have been able to meet the expected demand of airlines, passengers and freight forwarders and the level of the economic activity of the airport would have been reduced.
Asia C-482/99, Ranska v. komissio (Stardust Marine), tuomio 16.5.2002 (Kok., s. I-4397, 71 kohta).
It should also be noted that the public support was granted in a period when FFHG realised very significant investments into the infrastructure (more than EUR 220 million in 2001-2012).
Ks. vuoden 2014 ilmailusuuntaviivojen 53 kohta.
It follows that the investment aid covers only a fraction of the overall investment costs.
Ks. vuoden 2014 ilmailusuuntaviivojen 59 ja 61 kohta.
The Commission therefore considers that the aid measure at stake had an incentive effect, that the amount of aid was limited to the minimum necessary for the aided activity to take place, and was thus proportionate.
Päätös 2011/60/EU.
On the basis of the above, the Commission concludes that the investment aid granted to Frankfurt Hahn airport is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty as it complies with the compatibility conditions laid down in point 61 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
Tämä perustuu seuraavaan laskelmaan: […] lentoa vuonna 1999 * […] matkustajaa lentoa kohden = […] Ryanairin matkustajaa.
COMPATIBILITY OF OPERATING AID PURSUANT TO THE 2014 AVIATION GUIDELINES
Lentoasemamaksuja koskeva selvitys – Frankfurt-Hahnin lentoasema, 1999.
Section 5.1 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines sets out the criteria that the Commission will apply in assessing the compatibility of operating aid with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Uuden terminaalin investointikustannukset […] miljoonaa Saksan markkaa / terminaalin odotettu 20 vuoden taloudellinen käyttöaika = […] Saksan markan vuotuinen poisto.