natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As mentioned under Section 1 of this Decision, Germany has waived its right to have the decision adopted in German.
Jos Saksa perii takaisin ainoastaan liitteessä III olevassa 4 kohdassa esitetyt alustavat takaisinperittävät määrät, Saksan on varmistettava, että liitteessä III olevassa 4 kohdassa kuvattu korjausmekanismi pannaan täytäntöön vuoden kuluessa tämän päätöksen tiedoksiantamisesta.
The authentic language will therefore be English.
8 artikla
CONCLUSION AND RECOVERY
Saksan on toimitettava komissiolle kahden kuukauden kuluessa tämän päätöksen tiedoksiantamisesta seuraavat tiedot:
Given that the historic violation of Articles 30 and 110 of the Treaty by the EEG surcharge has been remedied, the Commission concludes that the support for EEG electricity producers, which was found to be compatible in recitals 187 and 200 of the Opening Decision, is also compliant with the internal market in so far as its financing mechanism is concerned.
luettelo tuensaajista, jotka ovat saaneet 3 artiklan 1 ja 2 kohdassa tarkoitettua tukea, ja kunkin tuensaajan tukiohjelman nojalla saaman tuen kokonaismäärä;
The Commission concludes that Germany has unlawfully implemented the aid for the support of EEG electricity production and for energy-intensive undertakings in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
kultakin tuensaajalta alustavasti takaisinperittävä kokonaismäärä (pääoma ja korot);
The aid should be recovered to the extent that it is incompatible with the internal market.
yksityiskohtainen kuvaus tämän päätöksen noudattamiseksi jo toteutetuista ja suunnitelluista toimenpiteistä, mukaan lukien liitteessä I esitetty sitoumus;
Recovery should only cover the reductions from the EEG-surcharge granted in respect of the years 2013 and 2014 (hereinafter ‘the years concerned’).
asiakirjat, jotka osoittavat, että tuensaajat on määrätty maksamaan tuki takaisin ja että liitteessä I esitettyä sitoumusta noudatetaan.
The recoverable amounts should be limited, for each of the years concerned, to the difference between the compatible amount for that year, as determined according to recitals 251, 252 and 253, and the amount of EEG-surcharge that was actually paid by the beneficiary in the year concerned.
Sen on myös annettava yksityiskohtaisia tietoja tuensaajilta takaisinperityn tuen ja koron määristä.
The amount of EEG-surcharge that was actually paid by the beneficiary in the year concerned is in principle obtained by applying the reduced surcharge for that year to the beneficiary's electricity consumption in that same year.
9 artikla
However, in order to speed up the recovery, and as the consumption data for the years concerned is not yet available for all undertakings concerned by recovery, Germany will, as a first step, use the electricity consumption that was submitted in the applications to calculate a preliminary recovery amount, to be recovered immediately.
Saksa on sitoutunut investoimaan 50 miljoonaa euroa uudelleen rajayhdysjohtoihin ja eurooppalaisiin energiahankkeisiin.
Germany will, as a second step, apply the actual consumption data of the years concerned in order to determine the final recovery amounts and take the necessary steps to ensure recovery or repayment on the basis of those final amounts (this second step in the recovery process is referred to as the ‘correction mechanism’).
Saksan on pidettävä komissio ajan tasalla tämän sitoumuksen täytäntöönpanosta.
The first step in determining the compatible amount lies in the application of Section 3.7.2 of the 2014 Guidelines.
10 artikla
The undertaking which benefited from the reduction must belong to the sectors listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines (point 185 of the 2014 Guidelines) or, failing this, the undertaking must have an electro-intensity of at least 20 % and belong to a sector with a trade intensity of at least 4 % at Union level, even if it does not belong to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines (point 186 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Tämä päätös on osoitettu Saksan liittotasavallalle.
For the application of point 186 of the 2014 Guidelines, as explained in recital 202, the data submitted in the applications made in respect of the years concerned may be used.
Tehty Brysselissä 25 päivänä marraskuuta 2014.
Moreover, if the undertaking is eligible on the basis of recital 251, the undertaking must pay at least 15 % of the additional costs without reduction (point 188 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Komission puolesta
However, the payable amount can be limited at undertaking level to 4 % of the gross value added of the undertaking concerned.
Komission jäsen
Moreover, for undertakings having an electro-intensity of at least 20 %, the payable amount can be limited to 0,5 % of the gross value added of the undertaking concerned (point 189 of the 2014 Guidelines).
EUVL C 37, 7.2.2014, s. 73, ja EUVL C 250, 1.8.2014, s. 15.
For the application of point 189 of the 2014 Guidelines, as explained in recital 202, the data submitted in the applications made in respect of the years concerned may be used.
Ks. alaviite 1.
If the undertaking is not eligible on the basis of recital 251, the payable amount is, according to Section 3.7.2 of the 2014 Guidelines, in principle equivalent to the EEG-surcharge without reduction, subject to the transit rule in point 197 of the 2014 Guidelines.
Asetus N:o 1 Euroopan talousyhteisössä käytettäviä kieliä koskevista järjestelyistä (EYVL 17, 6.10.1958, s. 385; suomenkielinen erityispainos: Luku 01, Nide 001, s. 14).
For 2014, the compatible amount should not exceed 150 % of the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 (that is to say, the previous year).
Ylärajaa sovelletaan myös rautatieyrityksiin.
As explained in recital 250, the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 and 2014 may, for the purpose of determining the preliminary recovery amount, be based on electricity consumption data included in the undertaking's application for the reduction in 2013 and 2014.
Kyseistä ylärajaa ei käsitellä tässä päätöksessä.
For the purpose of the correction mechanism, the actual electricity consumption data for 2013 and 2014 will be used once it is available.
EUVL C 200, 28.6.2014, s. 1.
If the payable amount determined on the basis of recitals 251, 252 and 253 is not higher than the amount that was actually paid by the beneficiary in either of the years concerned, there will be no recovery.
Asiat T-244/93 ja T-486/93, TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:1995:160.
Where the total amount of aid received by a beneficiary is less than EUR 200000 and where the aid meets all the other criteria of either Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 [117] or Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 [118], such aid should be deemed not to constitute State aid in the sense of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, and should therefore not be subject to recovery.
AusglMechAV-asetuksen 11 §:n mukaan verkkovirasto voi antaa säännöksiä yhteistyössä liittovaltion ympäristö-, luonnonsuojelu- ja ydinturvallisuusministeriön (nykyinen liittovaltion ympäristö-, luonnonsuojelu-, rakennus- ja ydinturvallisuusministeriö) ja liittovaltion talous- ja teknologiaministeriön (nykyinen liittovaltion talous- ja energiaministeriö) kanssa.
Where the total amount of aid received by a beneficiary is more than EUR 200000, of which an amount of less than EUR 200000 has to be recovered, Regulations (EC) No 1998/2006 and (EU) No 1407/2013 do not apply, because the aid concerns the same eligible costs and cumulation is therefore excluded (Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 and Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006).
Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivi 2009/28/EY, annettu 23 päivänä huhtikuuta 2009, uusiutuvista lähteistä peräisin olevan energian käytön edistämisestä sekä direktiivien 2001/77/EY ja 2003/30/EY muuttamisesta ja myöhemmästä kumoamisesta (EUVL L 140, 5.6.2009, s. 16).
Such amounts should therefore have to be recovered.
Asia C-379/98, PreussenElektra v. Schleswag, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160.
The Commission has further examined whether there are any obstacles to recovery pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Asia C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348.
As described in recital 172, some interested parties have argued that the adjustment in 2013 and 2014 should be as small as possible in order to safeguard the beneficiaries' legitimate expectations, and that no recovery should take place.
EYVL C 164, 10.7.2002, s. 5.
However, for the reasons stated in recitals 146 et seq., the Commission's decision in case NN 27/00 cannot give rise to legitimate expectations on the part of the beneficiaries, given that the EEG-Act 2012 is different from the EEG-Act 2000 and was adopted more than 10 years later and that in particular the BesAR did not exist in the EEG-Act 2000,
Asia C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Asia C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413.
Article 1
Asia C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851.
Article 3
Tämän väitteensä tueksi Saksa viittaa Euroopan energia-alan sääntelyviranomaisten neuvoston (CEER) 25.6.2013 päivättyyn kertomukseen ”Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe” (erityisesti taulukot sivuilla 18–20).
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking which does not belong to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines but had an electro-intensity of at least 20 % in 2012 and belonged, in that year, to a sector with a trade intensity of at least 4 % at Union level, it is compatible with the internal market if the undertaking paid at least 15 % of the additional costs faced by electricity suppliers due to obligations to buy renewable energy which were subsequently passed on to electricity consumers.
Asia T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, 82–85 kohta.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking eligible for compatible State aid on the basis of the second or third subparagraph, but the amount of the EEG-surcharge paid by that undertaking did not reach the level required by those subparagraphs, the following parts of the aid are compatible:
Asia T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, 82 kohta.
for 2013, the part of the aid which exceeds 125 % of the surcharge that the undertaking actually paid in 2013;
Asia T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, 84 kohta.
for 2014, the part of the aid which exceeds 150 % of the surcharge that the undertaking actually paid in 2013.
Asia T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, 85 kohta.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking not eligible for compatible State aid on the basis of the second or third subparagraph, and where the undertaking paid less than 20 % of the additional costs of the surcharge without reduction, the following parts of the aid are compatible:
Asia C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598, 48 kohta.
Individual aid granted on the basis of the aid schemes referred to in Articles 1 and 3 does not constitute aid if, at the time it was granted, it fulfilled the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 [119] which was applicable at the time the aid was granted.Article 5
Asia C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, 87 kohta.
Individual aid granted on the basis of the aid schemes referred to in Articles 1 and 3 which, at the time it was granted, fulfilled the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 994/98, or by any approved aid scheme, is compatible with the internal market, up to maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.
Asia C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, 89–93 kohta.
Article 6
Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivi 2009/72/EY, annettu 13 päivänä heinäkuuta 2009, sähkön sisämarkkinoita koskevista yhteisistä säännöistä ja direktiivin 2003/54/EY kumoamisesta (EUVL L 211, 14.8.2009, s. 55).
Germany shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Article 3(2) from the beneficiaries according to the method described in Annex III.
Yhdistetyt asiat 67/85, 68/85 ja 70/85, Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy ym., ECLI:EU:C:1988:38; asia T-157/01, Danske Busvognmænd v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76; yhdistetyt asiat T-254/00, T-270/00 ja T-277/00, Hotel Cipriani SpA ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2008:537.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Yhdistetyt asiat 67/85, 68/85 ja 70/85, Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy ym., ECLI:EU:C:1988:38, 30 kohta.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [120].
Asia T-157/01, Danske Busvognmænd v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76,57 kohta.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the scheme referred to in Article 3(2) with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Yhdistetyt asiat T-254/00, T-270/00 ja T-277/00, Hotel Cipriani SpA ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2008:537,185 kohta.
Article 7
Asia C-71/09 P, Comitato ”Venezia vuole vivere” ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368.
Recovery of the incompatible aid referred to in Article 3(2) shall be immediate and effective.
Asia C-71/09 P, Comitato ”Venezia vuole vivere” ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, 92 kohta.
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision by recovering the incompatible aid granted.
Asia C-71/09 P, Comitato ”Venezia vuole vivere” ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, 95 kohta.
Where Germany recovers only the preliminary recovery amounts set out in paragraph 4 of Annex III, Germany shall ensure that the correction mechanism described in paragraph 4 of Annex III is implemented within one year following the date of notification of this Decision.
Asia C-71/09 P, Comitato ”Venezia vuole vivere” ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, 96 kohta.
Article 8
Asia T-295/12, Saksa v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2014:675, 144 kohta; asia T-309/12 – Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2014:676, 261 kohta.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information:
Asia T-226/09, British Telecommunications et al. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2013:466, 71 kohta.
the list of beneficiaries that have received aid referred to in Article 3(1) and (2) and the total amount of aid received by each of them under the scheme;
Vrt. julkisasiamies Watheletin päätelmät, asia C-242/13, Commerz Nederland, ECLI:EU:C:2014:308, 75 kohta ja sitä seuraavat kohdat.
the total preliminary recovery amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
Asia C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig v. Saksa, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, 21 kohta.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision, including the commitment set out in Annex I;
Asia C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, 35 kohta.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid and that the commitment set out in Annex I is complied with.
Asia C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851,16–20 kohta.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3(2) has been completed and the commitment set out in Annex I is fully implemented.
Asia C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, 21 kohta.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Asia C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig v. Saksa, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, 21 kohta; asia 173/73, Italia v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, 35 kohta; asia 259/85, Ranska v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:1987:478, 23 kohta; asia C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, 66 kohta.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Asia 173/73, Italia v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, 16 kohta.
Article 9
Asia T-139/09, Ranska v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2012:496, 63 ja 64 kohta.
Germany has committed to reinvest EUR 50 million in interconnectors and in European energy projects.
Asia C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, 70 kohta; asia C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, 20 kohta.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the implementation of this commitment.
Asia C-72/91, Sloman Neptun v Bodo Ziesemer, ECLI:EU:C:1993:97, 19 kohta.
Article 10
Asia C-72/91, Sloman Neptun v Bodo Ziesemer, ECLI:EU:C:1993:97.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Asia C-72/91, Sloman Neptun v Bodo Ziesemer, ECLI:EU:C:1993:97, 21 kohta.
Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.
Osavaltion ylioikeuden (Oberlandesgericht Hamm) 14 päivänä toukokuuta 2013 antama tuomio, viite 19 U 180/12.
For the Commission
Vrt. asia C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig v. Saksa, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, 21 kohta.
Member of the Commission
Asia C-275/13, Elcogás, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2314, 29 kohta.
OJ C 37, 7.2.2014, p. 73, and OJ C 250, 1.8.2014, p. 15.
Asia C-399/10 P, Bouygues ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2013:175, 103 kohta.
Cf. footnote 1.
Asia C-399/10 P, Bouygues ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2013:175, 104 kohta.
Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ Series I, Volume 1952-1958, p. 59).
Asia C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, 19 kohta; asia C-275/13, Elcogás, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2314, 24 kohta.
Gesetz für den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz — EEG), as amended by Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechtsrahmens für die Förderung der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1634, and by Gesetz zur Änderung des Rechtsrahmens für Strom aus solarer Strahlungsenergie und zu weiteren Änderungen im Recht der erneuerbaren Energien vom 17.
Asia C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, 25 kohta; asia 173/73, Italia v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, 16 kohta.
August 2012, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1754.
Asia C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, 32 kohta.
Juli 2014, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1066.
Asia C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, 36 kohta.
State aid case SA.38632 (2014/N) — Germany: EEG 2014 — Reform of the Renewable Energy Law (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Asia C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, 38 kohta.
Juli 2009, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 2101, as amended by Article 2 of Gesetz vom 17.
Ks. alaviite 69.
Februar 2010, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 134, as amended by the Zweite Verordnung zur Änderung der Ausgleichsmechanismus-Ausführungsverordnung vom 19.
Asia C-279/08 P, komissio v. Alankomaat, ECLI:EU:C:2011:551, 102–113 kohta.
Februar 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 310.
Ks. alaviite 21.
The cap is also granted to railway undertakings.
Neuvoston asetus (EY) N:o 659/1999, annettu 22 päivänä maaliskuuta 1999, Euroopan unionin toiminnasta tehdyn sopimuksen 108 artiklan soveltamista koskevista yksityiskohtaisista säännöistä (EYVL L 83, 27.3.1999, s. 1).
This cap is not examined in the framework of this decision.
Tuomio asiassa Saksa ym. v. Kronofrance, C-75/05 ja C-80/05, ECLI:EU:C:2008:482, 61 kohta muine viittauksineen.
OJ C 200, 28.6.2014, p. 1.
Asianomaiset osapuolet ovat viitanneet seuraavaan oikeuskäytäntöön: asia C-260/91, Diversinte, ECLI:EU:C:1993:136, 9 kohta; asia C-63/83, Regina v. Kirk, ECLI:EU:C:1984:255, 21 kohta ja sitä seuraavat kohdat; asia C-1/73, Westzucker, ECLI:EU:C:1973:78, 5 kohta; asia C-295/02, Gerken, ECLI:EU:C:2004:400, 47 kohta ja sitä seuraavat kohdat; asia C-420/06, Jager, ECLI:EU:C:2008:152, 59 kohta ja sitä seuraavat kohdat; asia C-189/02 P, Dansk Rørindustri ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2005:408, 217 kohta.
Cases T-244/93 and T-486/93, TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:1995; 160.
Asia C-334/07 Ρ, komissio v. Freistaat Sachsen, ECLI:EU:C:2008:709, 43 kohta; asia T-176/01, Ferrière Nord ν. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2004:336, 139 kohta.
According to § 11 AusglMechV, the BNetzA can enact regulations in agreement with the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (now Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Construction and Nuclear Safety) and the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (now Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy).
Asia 68/69, Bundesknappschaft v. Brock, ECLI:EU:C:1970:24, 6 kohta; asia 1/73 Westzucker GmbH v. Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Zucker, ECLI:EU:C:1973:78, 5 kohta; asia 143/73, SOPAD v. FORMA ym., ECLI:EU:C:1973:145, 8 kohta; asia 96/77, Bauche, ECLI:EU:C:1978:26, 48 kohta; asia 125/77, KoninklijkeScholten-Honig NV ym. v. Floofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten, ECLI:EU:C:1978:187, 37 kohta; asia 40/79, Ρ v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:1981:32, 12 kohta; asia 270/84, Licata v. ESC, ECLI:EU:C:1986:304, 31 kohta; asia C-60/98, Butterfly Music v. CEDEM, ECLI:EU:C:1999:333, 24 kohta; asia C-334/07 Ρ, komissio v. Freistaat Sachsen, ECLI:EU:C:2008:709, 53 kohta; asia T-404/05, Kreikka v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2008:510, 77 kohta.
Juli 2005, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1970, 3621, as amended by Article 3(4) of Gesetz vom 4.
Asia C-169/95, Espanja v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:1997:10, 51–54 kohta; yhdistetyt asiat T-116/01 ja T-118/01, P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA v. komissio, ECLI:EU:T:2003:217, 205 kohta.
Oktober 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 3746.
Yhdistetyt asiat C-465/09 P–C-470/09 P, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya ym. v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2011:372, 125 ja 128 kohta.
Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16).
Neuvoston direktiivi 2003/96/EY, annettu 27 päivänä lokakuuta 2003, energiatuotteiden ja sähkön verotusta koskevan yhteisön kehyksen uudistamisesta (EUVL L 283, 31.10.2003, s. 51).
Case C-379/98, PreussenElektra v Schleswag, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160.
Asia C-261/01, van Calster, ECLI:EU:C:2003:571, 49 kohta; asia C-333/07, Société Régie Networks, ECLI:EU:C:2008:764, 89 kohta.
Case C-677/11, Doux Élevage.
Ks. edellä alaviite 75.
ECLI:EU:C:2013:348.
Asia C-310/99, Italia v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2002:143, 52 kohta.
OJ C 164, 10.7.2002, p. 5.
EUVL C 188, 20.6.2014, s. 4.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Yhteisön suuntaviivat valtiontuesta ympäristönsuojelulle (EUVL C 82, 1.4.2008, s. 1).
Case C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413.
KOM(2010) 2020 lopullinen, s. 10.
Case C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851.
Asia C-301/96, Saksa v. komissio, ECLI:EU:C:2003:509, 106 kohta.
Case C-573/12, Ålands Vindkraft, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2037.
Yhdistetyt asiat T-254/00, T-270/00 ja T-277/00, Hotel Cipriani SpA ym., ECLI:EU:T:2008:537, 337 kohta.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87 to 93.
SA.26036 (C24/09) – Valtiontuki energiaintensiivisille yrityksille, ekosähköä koskeva laki, Itävalta (EUVL L 235, 10.9.2011, s. 42).
The Altmark criteria have been set out by the Court of Justice to clarify under what circumstances a compensation provided by a public authority for the performance of a Service of General Economic Interest (‘SGEI’) qualifies as State aid under Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Tuomio asiassa Saksa v. komissio (”Jadekost”), C-288/96, ECLI:EU:C:2000:537, 77 kohta muine viittauksineen.
In support of this argument, Germany cites the Council of European Energy Regulators' (CEER) report of 25 June 2013, titled ‘Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe’ (in particular, the tables at pages 18-20).
Vuoden 2014 EEG-päätöksen johdanto-osan 293 kappale.