natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It SHALL include both ‘PostalAddress’ (i.e. street address, locality, [state or province], [postal code] and ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code) as compliant with clause 5.3.5.1; and ‘ElectronicAddress’ (i.e. e-mail and/or website URI) as compliant with clause 5.3.5.2.
Siinä PITÄÄ olla sekä ”PostalAddress” (eli lähiosoite, postitoimipaikka, [osavaltio tai maakunta], [postinumero] ja standardin ISO 3166-1 mukainen kaksimerkkinen maakoodi) lausekkeen 5.3.5.1 mukaisesti että ”ElectronicAddress” (eli sähköpostiosoite ja/tai verkkosivuston URI) lausekkeen 5.3.5.2 mukaisesti.
Scheme name (clause 5.3.6)
Scheme name (lauseke 5.3.6)
This field is REQUIRED specifying the name under which the scheme operates.
Tämä kenttä on PAKOLLINEN, ja siinä määritetään nimi, jolla järjestelmä toimii.
It SHALL be a sequence of multilingual character strings (with EN as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages) defined as follows:
Sen PITÄÄ olla monikielisten merkkijonojen jakso (pakollisena kielenä EN ja mahdollisesti yksi tai useampi kansallinen kieli) seuraavasti:
The EN version SHALL be a character string structured as follows:
EN-toisinnon PITÄÄ olla seuraavasti jäsentyvä merkkijono:
Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers, which are supervised/accredited by the referenced Scheme Operator Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC.
”EN_name_value” on Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers, which are supervised/accredited by the referenced Scheme Operator Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC.
Any Member State’s national language version SHALL be a character string structured as follows:
Mahdollisen jäsenvaltion kansallisen kielitoisinnon PITÄÄ olla seuraavasti jäsentyvä merkkijono:
The scheme name is required to uniquely identify, by name, the scheme referred to by the Scheme information URI, and also to ensure that in case a scheme operator operates more than one scheme, there is a distinct name given to each of them.
Järjestelmän nimen tulee tunnistaa yksiselitteisesti nimeltä järjestelmä, johon kenttä ”Scheme information URI” viittaa, ja varmistaa, että yhden järjestelmäoperaattorin ylläpitäessä useampaa kuin yhtä järjestelmää jokaiselle järjestelmälle on annettu erottuva nimi.
Member States and Scheme operators SHALL make sure that when a Member State or a Scheme Operator operates more than one scheme, there is a distinct name given to each of them.
Jäsenvaltioiden ja järjestelmäoperaattorien PITÄÄ varmistaa, että kun jäsenvaltiossa tai järjestelmäoperaattorilla on käytössä useampi kuin yksi järjestelmä, jokaiselle järjestelmälle on annettu erottuva nimi.
Scheme information URI (clause 5.3.7)
Scheme information URI (lauseke 5.3.7)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the URI(s) where users (relying parties) can obtain scheme-specific information (with EN as the mandatory language and with potentially one or more national languages).
Tämä kenttä on PAKOLLINEN, ja siinä PITÄÄ määritellä URI(:t), jo(i)sta käyttäjät (varmenteeseen luottavat osapuolet) voivat saada järjestelmäkohtaista tietoa (pakollisena kielenä EN ja mahdollisesti yksi tai useampi kansallinen kieli).
This SHALL be a sequence of multilingual pointers (with EN as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages).
Sen PITÄÄ olla monikielisten osoittimien jakso (pakollisena kielenä EN ja mahdollisesti yksi tai useampi kansallinen kieli).
The referenced URI(s) MUST provide a path to information describing ‘appropriate information about the scheme’.
Mainitun/mainittujen URI:(e)n PITÄÄ sisältää polku tietoon, jossa kuvataan ”asianmukaiset tiedot järjestelmästä”.
The appropriate information about the scheme SHALL include as a minimum:
”Asianmukaisiin tietoihin järjestelmästä” PITÄÄ sisällyttää ainakin seuraavat:
General introductory information that would be common to all Member States with regard to the scope and context of the Trusted List, and the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s).
Yleiset johdantotiedot, jotka olisivat kaikille jäsenvaltioille yhteisiä ja koskisivat luotettavan luettelon soveltamisalaa ja käyttöyhteyttä sekä sen laadintaan vaikuttaneita valvonta-/akkreditointijärjestelmiä.
The common text to be used is as follows:
Käytettävä yhteinen teksti on seuraavanlainen:
‘The present list is the TSL implementation of [name of the relevant Member State] “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
”The present list is the TSL implementation of [name of the relevant Member State] ”Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
The Trusted List of a Member State provides a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3,3, 3.2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
The Trusted List of a Member State provides a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3.3, 3.2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
Specific information on the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s), in particular [16]: Information on the supervision system applicable to any CSPQC;
Erityiset tiedot käytetyistä valvonta-/akkreditointijärjestelmistä, erityisesti seuraavat [16]: tiedot hyväksyttyjä varmenteita myöntäviin varmennepalvelujen tarjoajiin (CSPQC) sovellettavasta valvontajärjestelmästä,
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSPQC;
tiedot hyväksyttyjä varmenteita myöntäviin varmennepalvelujen tarjoajiin (CSPQC) sovellettavasta kansallisesta ”vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvasta akkreditointijärjestelmästä”, mikäli sellainen on,
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs;
tiedot niihin varmennepalvelujen tarjoajiin, jotka eivät myönnä hyväksyttyjä varmenteita (QC), sovellettavasta kansallisesta ”vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvasta akkreditointijärjestelmästä”, mikäli sellainen on.
This specific information SHALL include, at least, for each underlying scheme listed above:
Edellä mainittujen tietojen PITÄÄ sisältää jokaisesta edellä luetellusta järjestelmästä ainakin seuraavat tiedot:
General description;
yleiskuvaus,
Information about the process followed by the Supervisory/Accreditation Body to supervise/accredit CSPs and by the CSPs for being supervised/accredited;
tiedot prosessista, jota valvonta-/akkreditointilaitos noudattaa valvoessaan/akkreditoidessaan varmennepalvelujen tarjoajia ja joita valvotut/akkreditoidut varmennepalvelujen tarjoajat noudattavat,
Information about the criteria against which CSPs are supervised/accredited.
tiedot kriteereistä, joiden perusteella varmennepalvelujen tarjoajia valvotaan/akkreditoidaan.
Specific information, when applicable, on the specific qualifications some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level including the meaning of such a qualification and the associated national provisions and requirements.
Mahdolliset erityiset tiedot joillekin varmennepalvelun tarjonnan tuloksena luoduille tai myönnetyille fyysisille tai binaarisille (loogisille) kohteille annetuista erityisistä ”kelpuutuksista”, jotka on myönnetty sillä perusteella, että tarjoajat täyttävät kansallisella tasolla annetut säännökset ja vaatimukset, samoin kuin tiedot tällaisen ”kelpuutuksen” ja siihen liittyvien kansallisten säädösten ja vaatimusten merkityksestä.
Additional Member State specific information about the scheme MAY additionally be provided on a voluntary basis.
Muita jäsenvaltiokohtaisia erityisiä tietoja järjestelmästä SAA lisäksi tarjota vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvana.
This SHALL include:
Niiden PITÄÄ sisältää seuraavat:
Information about the criteria and rules used to select supervisors/auditors and defining how CSPs are supervised (controlled)/accredited (audited) by them;
tiedot kriteereistä ja säännöistä, joilla valvojat/auditoijat valikoidaan ja määritellään, millä tavoin valvojat/auditoijat valvovat (tarkastavat) / akkreditoivat (auditoivat) varmennepalvelujen tarjoajia (CSP),
Other contact and general information that applies to the scheme operation.
muut yhteys- ja yleistiedot järjestelmän toiminnasta.
Status determination approach (clause 5.3.8)
Status determination approach (lauseke 5.3.8)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the identifier of the status determination approach.
Tämä kenttä on PAKOLLINEN, ja siinä PITÄÄ määritellä statuksen määrityksessä käytetyn lähestymistavan tunniste.
The following specific URI SHALL be used, as registered and described as follows:
Seuraavaa erityistä URI:tä PITÄÄ käyttää ja se PITÄÄ rekisteröidä ja kuvata seuraavasti:
Description Services listed have their status determined by or on behalf of the Scheme Operator under an appropriate system for a referenced Member State that allows for ‘supervision’ (and, when applicable, for ‘voluntary accreditation’) of certification service providers who are established on its territory (or established in a third country in the case of ‘voluntary accreditation’) and issue qualified certificates to the public according to Art. 3,3 (respectively Art. 3,2 or Art. 7.1(a)) of the Directive 1999/93/EC, and, when applicable, that allows for the ‘supervision’/‘voluntary accreditation’ of certification service providers not issuing qualified certificates, according to a nationally defined and established recognised ‘approval scheme(s)’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance of services from CSPs not issuing QCs with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and potentially extended by national provisions with regard to the provision of such certification services.
Kuvaus Luettelossa olevien palvelujen statuksen on määrittänyt järjestelmäoperaattori tai se on määritetty järjestelmäoperaattorin puolesta kyseisen jäsenvaltion asianmukaisessa järjestelmässä, joka mahdollistaa sen alueelle sijoittautuneiden (tai ”vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvan akkreditoinnin” yhteydessä, mikäli sellainen on käytössä, kolmanteen maahan sijoittautuneiden), direktiivin 1999/93/EY 3 artiklan 3 kohdan (tai 3 artiklan 2 kohdan tai 7 artiklan 1 kohdan a alakohdan) mukaisesti hyväksyttyjä varmenteita yleisölle myöntävien varmennepalvelujen tarjoajien ”valvonnan” (ja ”vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvan akkreditoinnin”), sekä tarvittaessa sellaisten varmennepalvelujen tarjoajien, jotka eivät myönnä hyväksyttyjä varmenteita, ”valvonnan” / ”vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvan akkreditoinnin” kansallisesti määriteltyjen ja käyttöön otettujen ”tunnustettujen hyväksymisjärjestelmien” mukaisesti, jotka on toteutettu kansallisesti sen valvomiseksi, että varmennepalvelujen tarjoajien, jotka eivät myönnä hyväksyttyjä varmenteita, suorittamat palvelut ovat direktiivin 1999/93/EY säännösten ja niiden täydennykseksi mahdollisesti kansallisesti voimaan saatettujen, kyseisten varmennepalvelujen tarjontaa koskevien säännösten mukaisia.
Scheme type/community/rules (clause 5.3.9)
Scheme type/community/rules (lauseke 5.3.9)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL contain at least the following registered URIs:
Tämä kenttä on PAKOLLINEN, ja sen PITÄÄ sisältää ainakin seuraavat rekisteröidyt URI:t:
A URI common to all Member States' Trusted Lists pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to all TLs:
Kaikkien jäsenvaltioiden luotettavien luetteloiden yhteinen URI viittaa kuvaustekstiin, jota PITÄÄ soveltaa kaikkiin luotettaviin luetteloihin:
By which participation is denoted of the Member State’s scheme (identified via the TSL type (clause 5.3,3) and Scheme name (clause 5.3.6)) in a scheme of schemes (i.e. a TSL listing pointers to all Member States publishing and maintaining a TL in the form of a TSL);
Sen avulla jäsenvaltion järjestelmän (joka yksilöidään kentissä ”TSL type” (lauseke 5.3.3) ja ”Scheme name” (lauseke 5.3.6)) ilmoitetaan kuuluvan järjestelmien järjestelmään (eli TSL-listausosoittimet kaikkiin niihin jäsenvaltioihin, jotka julkaisevat ja ylläpitävät luotettavaa luetteloa TSL-muodossa).
Where users can obtain policy/rules against which services included in the list SHALL be assessed and from which the type of the TSL (see clause 5.3.3) can be determined;
Tästä URI:stä voidaan saada selville politiikka/säännöt, jonka/joiden suhteen luetteloon sisällytettyjä palveluja PITÄÄ arvioida ja määritellä TSL:n tyyppi (ks. lauseke 5.3.3).
Where users can obtain description about how to use and interpret the content of the TSL implementation of the Trusted List.
Tästä URI:stä käyttäjät voivat saada kuvauksen siitä, miten luotettavan luettelon TSL-toteutuksen sisältöä käytetään ja tulkitaan.
These usage rules SHALL be common to all Member States' Trusted Lists whatever the type of listed service and whatever the supervision/accreditation system(s) is (are).
Näiden käyttösääntöjen PITÄÄ olla yhteiset kaikkien jäsenvaltioiden luotettaville luetteloille riippumatta luettelon palvelun tyypistä ja käytössä olevista valvonta-/akkreditointijärjestelmistä.
Descriptive text:
Kuvausteksti:
‘Participation in a scheme
”Participation in a scheme
Each Member State must create a “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
Each Member State must create a ”Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
The Trusted List of a Member State must provide a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3.3, 3,2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the Qualified Certificate (QC) supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
The Trusted List of a Member State must provide a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3.3, 3.2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the Qualified Certificate (QC) supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
The applicable “supervision” system (respectively “voluntary accreditation” system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11).
The applicable ’supervision’ system (respectively ’voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3.3, Art. 8.1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art. 2.13, Art. 3.2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8.1, Art. 11).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a “voluntary accreditation” system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined “recognised approval scheme” implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a ’voluntary accreditation’ system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined ”recognised approval scheme” implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2.11 of the Directive).
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific “qualification” on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a “qualification” is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific ”qualification” on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a ”qualification” is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
indicates that from the “Service digital identifier” (Sdi) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the “Sdi” identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate ETSI TS 101 862 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcC, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI TS 101 456 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
indicates that from the ”Service digital identifier” (”Sdi”) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the ”Sdi” identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate ETSI TS 101 862 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcC, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI TS 101 456 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
Note: if no “Sie”“Qualification” information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not “further identified” through a related Sie entry, then the “machine-processable” information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
Note: if no ”Sie””Qualification” information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not ”further identified” through a related ”Sie” entry, then the ”machine-processable” information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
“QCWithSSCD” qualifier value meaning “QC supported by an SSCD”, or
”QCWithSSCD” qualifier value meaning ”QC supported by an SSCD”, or
“QCNoSSCD” qualifier value meaning “QC not supported by an SSCD”, or
”QCNoSSCD” qualifier value meaning ”QC not supported by an SSCD”, or
“QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the “Sdi”-“Sie” provided information in this CA/QC entry;
”QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the ”Sdi”-”Sie” provided information in this CA/QC entry;
“QCForLegalPerson” qualifier value meaning “Certificate issued to a Legal Person”
”QCForLegalPerson” qualifier value meaning ”Certificate issued to a Legal Person”
The general interpretation rule for any other “Sti” type entry is that the listed service named according to the “Sn” field value and uniquely identified by the “Sdi” field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the “Scs” field value as from the date indicated in the “Current status starting date and time”.
The general interpretation rule for any other ”Sti” type entry is that the listed service named according to the ”Sn” field value and uniquely identified by the ”Sdi” field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the ”Scs” field value as from the date indicated in the ”Current status starting date and time”.
Specific interpretation rules for any additional information with regard to a listed service (e.g. “Service information extensions” field) may be found, when applicable, in the Member State specific URI as part of the present “Scheme type/community/rules” field.
Specific interpretation rules for any additional information with regard to a listed service (e.g. ”Service information extensions” field) may be found, when applicable, in the Member State specific URI as part of the present ”Scheme type/community/rules” field.
Please refer to the Technical specifications for a Common Template for the “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” in the Annex of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC for further details on the fields, description and meaning for the TSL implementation of the Member States' Trusted Lists.’
Please refer to the Technical specifications for a Common Template for the ”Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” in the Annex of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC for further details on the fields, description and meaning for the TSL implementation of the Member States’ Trusted Lists.”
A URI specific to each Member State’s Trusted List pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to this Member State TL:
Kunkin jäsenvaltion luotettavan luettelon erityinen URI viittaa kuvaustekstiin, jota PITÄÄ soveltaa kyseisen jäsenvaltion luotettavaan luetteloon:
where CC = the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 Country Code used in the ‘Scheme territory’ field (clause 5.3.10)
jossa CC on ”Scheme territory” -kentässä (lauseke 5.3.10) käytetty standardin ISO 3166-1 kaksimerkkinen maakoodi.
Where users can obtain the referenced Member State’s specific policy/rules against which services included in the list SHALL be assessed in compliance with the Member State’s appropriate supervision system and voluntary accreditation schemes.
Tästä URI:stä käyttäjät voivat saada selville kyseisen jäsenvaltion erityisen politiikan/säännöt, jonka/joiden suhteen luetteloon sisällytettyjä palveluja PITÄÄ arvioida jäsenvaltion asianmukaisen valvontajärjestelmän ja vapaaehtoisuuteen perustuvien akkreditointijärjestelmien mukaisesti.