natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the competent authority of a Member State notifies the President of the end of the term of office of a Member of the European Parliament pursuant to the provisions of the law of that Member State, as a result either of incompatibilities within the meaning of Article 7(3) of the [1976 Act] or withdrawal of the mandate pursuant to Article 13(3) of that Act, the President shall inform Parliament that the mandate ended on the date communicated by the Member State and invite the Member State to fill the vacant seat without delay.
Kui liikmesriigi pädev asutus teavitab presidenti Euroopa Parlamendi liikme volituste lõppemisest selle liikmesriigi õigusnormide kohaselt […] 1976. aasta akti artikli 7 lõikes 3 nimetatud kokkusobimatuse tõttu või mandaadi kehtetuks tunnistamise tõttu nimetatud akti artikli 13 lõike 3 kohaselt, teavitab president parlamenti mandaadi lõppemisest liikmesriigi teatatud kuupäeval ja palub liikmesriigil vaba koht viivitamatult täita.
Where the competent authorities of the Member States or of the Union or the Member concerned notify the President of an appointment or election to an office incompatible with the office of Member of the European Parliament within the meaning of Article 7(1) or (2) of the [1976 Act], the President shall inform Parliament, which shall establish that there is a vacancy.’
Kui mõni liikmesriigi või liidu pädev ametiasutus või asjaomane parlamendiliige teatab presidendile parlamendiliikme sellisesse ametisse nimetamisest või valimisest, mis on kokkusobimatu Euroopa Parlamendi liikme ametiga […] 1976. aasta akti artikli 7 lõigete 1 või 2 tähenduses, informeerib president sellest parlamenti, mis võtab seejärel vastu otsuse parlamendiliikme koha vabaks jäämise kohta.”
This Statute shall enter into force on the first day of the European Parliament parliamentary term beginning in 2009.’
Käesolev põhimäärus jõustub 2009. aastal algava Euroopa Parlamendi ametiaja esimesel päeval.”
Moreover, recital 4 of the Statute for Members reads as follows:
Parlamendiliikmete põhimääruse põhjendus 4 on sõnastatud järgmiselt:
‘The freedom and independence of Members, which are enshrined in Article 2 and which are not mentioned in any provision of primary law, should receive statutory protection .
„Artiklis 2 kaitstava parlamendiliikmete vabaduse ja sõltumatuse tarvis on samuti vajalikud asjakohased eeskirjad, mida aga aluslepingute tekstides kusagil ei nimetata.
Undertakings made by Members to relinquish their office at a given time, or declarations of their intent to relinquish office on an unspecified date, which political parties can make use of at their discretion, should be considered as incompatible with Members’ freedom and independence and should therefore not be binding in law.’
Avaldusi, millega parlamendiliikmed kohustuvad mandaadist teatud ajahetkel loobuma või blankoavaldusi mandaadist loobumise kohta, mida erakond saab kasutada vastavalt oma äranägemisele, tuleks käsitleda parlamendiliikme vabaduse ja sõltumatusega mitteühildatavana ning seega ei tohiks need olla õiguslikult siduvad.”
At the elections to the European Parliament, held on 12 and 13 June 2004, Beniamino Donnici, the applicant, was a candidate on the ‘Società Civile — Di Pietro Occhetto’ list, in the Italy South constituency.
Euroopa Parlamendi liikmete valimistel, mis toimusid 12. ja 13. juunil 2004, kandideeris hageja Beniamino Donnici ühisnimekirjas „Società Civile – Di Pietro Occhetto” Lõuna-Itaalia valimisringkonnas.
That list won two seats, the first in that constituency and the second in the Italy North-West constituency. Mr A .
Nimekiri sai kaks mandaati – esimese selles valimisringkonnas ja teise Loode-Itaalia valimisringkonnas.
Di Pietro was elected in both constituencies and opted for the Italy South constituency.
A. Di Pietro, kes sai mõlemas valimisringkonnas enim hääli, otsustas Lõuna-Itaalia valimisringkonna kasuks.
Mr A . Occhetto was second on the electoral lists in the light of the number of votes obtained in the two constituencies, coming ahead of the applicant in the Italy South constituency and of Mr G. Chiesa in the Italy North-West constituency.
A. Occhetto oli valimisnimekirjas teisel kohal, võttes arvesse mõlemas valimisringkonnas saadud häälte arvu, ning edestas hagejat Lõuna-Itaalia valimisringkonnas ja G. Chiesat Loode-Itaalia valimisringkonnas.
Since Mr Di Pietro opted to take his seat for the Italy South constituency, Mr Occhetto should have been declared elected in the Italy North-West constituency. However, by a written declaration, signed before a notary on 6 July 2004 and received by the Ufficio elettorale nazionale per il Parlamento europeo presso la Corte di cassazione
Kuna A. Di Pietro valis Lõuna-Itaalia valimisringkonna mandaadi, oleks A. Occhetto pidanud kuulutatama valituks Loode-Itaalia valimisringkonnas.
(National Electoral Office for the European Parliament at the Court of Appeal; ‘the National Electoral Office’) on 7 July 2004, Mr Occhetto, who at the time was a member of the Italian Senate, ‘irrevocably’ withdrew as a candidate for election to the European Parliament in both constituencies.
Corte di cassazione’sse (Euroopa Parlamendi valimisteks Corte di cassazione juurde moodustatud riiklik valimiskomisjon, edaspidi „Itaalia valimiskomisjon”), „pöördumatult” Euroopa Parlamendi liikme mandaadist kummaski valimisringkonnas.
Following that withdrawal, on 12 November 2004 the National Electoral Office notified the Parliament of the official results of the European elections with the list of the candidates elected and their substitutes.
Pärast loobumist edastas Itaalia valimiskomisjon 12. novembril 2004 parlamendile Euroopa Parlamendi valimiste ametlikud tulemused koos valituks osutunud kandidaatide ja nende asendusliikmete nimekirjaga.
The National Electoral Office declared Mr Chiesa elected in the Italy North-West constituency and Mr Di Pietro elected in the Italy South constituency, the applicant becoming the first on the list of the candidates who had not been elected in the latter constituency.
Itaalia valimiskomisjon kuulutas G. Chiesa valituks Loode-Itaalia valimisringkonnas ja A. Di Pietro Lõuna-Itaalia valimisringkonnas, mistõttu hageja oli viimati mainitud valimisringkonnas esimene valimata jäänud kandidaat.
In the parliamentary elections held in Italy on 9 and 10 April 2006, Mr Di Pietro was elected as a Member of the Italian Parliament and opted to take his seat in the National Parliament, with effect from 28 April 2006.
Itaalia seadusandliku võimu valimistel 9. ja 10. aprillil 2006 valiti A. Di Pietro Itaalia parlamendi saadikuks ning ta otsustas siseriikliku mandaadi kasuks alates 28. aprillist 2006.
Since, pursuant to Article 7(2) of the 1976 Act, that office was incompatible with the office of Member of the European Parliament, on 27 April 2006 the Parliament established that the seat in question was vacant, with effect from the following day, and informed the Italian Republic .
Kuna parlamendiliige ei või vastavalt 1976. aasta akti artikli 7 lõikele 2 seda ülesannet täita, tõdes parlament 27. aprillil 2006, et alates järgmisest päevast on kõnealune koht vaba, ning teavitas sellest Itaalia Vabariiki.
By declaration of 27 April 2006, addressed to the National Electoral Office, Mr Occhetto revoked his withdrawal of 7 July 2004, expressing ‘his intention, as the first of the candidates who had not been elected in the [Italy South] constituency, of succeeding Mr [Di] Pietro, so that any previous declaration of a different intent … should be regarded as invalid and without effect and, in any event, revoked, and that in any event it [was] necessary in that regard to take account of the intent expressed on the date of the proclamation of the names of the candidates elected’.
Itaalia valimiskomisjonile 27. aprillil 2006 saadetud avalduses võttis A. Occhetto oma 7. juuli 2004. aasta loobumise tagasi, väljendades „tahet olla [Lõuna-Itaalia] valimisringkonna esimese valimata jäänud kandidaadina A. [Di] Pietro mantlipärija, mistõttu tuleb mis tahes varem tehtud teistsugune tahteavaldus lugeda kehtetuks, mõjutuks ja igal juhul tagasi võetuks […] ning igal juhul tuleb arvesse võtta kandidaatide valituks kuulutamise päeval väljendatud tahet”.
Following that declaration, on 8May 2006 the National Electoral Office declared Mr Occhetto elected as Member of the European Parliament .
Selle avalduse alusel kuulutas Itaalia valimiskomisjon 8. mail 2006 A. Occhetto parlamendiliikmena valituks.
By judgment of 21 July 2006, the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio (Lazio Regional Administrative Court, Italy) dismissed as unfounded the applicant’s action for annulment of that proclamation.
Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio (Lazio piirkondlik halduskohus, Itaalia) jättis 21. juuli 2006. aasta otsusega kaebuse, mille hageja esitas kõnealuse valituks kuulutamise tühistamiseks, põhjendamatuse tõttu rahuldamata.
In essence, the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio considered that Mr Occhetto’s withdrawal of 7 July 2004 in respect of the proclamation of elected representatives did not constitute a withdrawal from his position on the post-electoral list .
Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio leidis sisuliselt, et A. Occhetto 7. juuli 2004. aasta loobumine, mis puudutas kandidaatide valituks kuulutamist, ei ole käsitletav loobumisena kohast valimistejärgses järjestuses.
The grounds for its decision were that respect for the will of the people requires that electoral results be regarded as inalienable and unalterable, that such a withdrawal has no effect when any acts of substitution are being adopted in the event of incompatibility, loss of civil rights, ineligibility or resignation from an appointment or position on the part of those officially entitled to them, and that a candidate who has withdrawn from an election is entitled, where the prerequisites for substitution are verified, to withdraw his act of withdrawal in order to take over a seat to be recovered by means of substitution.
Ta põhjendas oma otsust, rõhutades, et rahva tahte austamine sunnib valimistulemusi pidama vääramatuteks ja muutmatuteks, et selline loobumine ei mõjuta võimalike asendamisaktide vastuvõtmist õigustatud isikute ülesannete kokkusobimatuse, mandaadi kehtetuks tunnistamise, valimiskõlbmatuse või ametisse nimetamisest või mandaadist loobumise korral ning et järelikult on valituks osutumisest loobunud kandidaadil õigus juhul, kui on täidetud asendamise tingimused, oma loobumisotsus tagasi võtta, et asuda asendamise teel täidetavale kohale.
The applicant also appealed before Parliament against the declaration of Mr Occhetto as Member of the European Parliament in place of Mr Di Pietro.
Hageja vaidlustas ka parlamendis selle, et A. Occhetto nimetati A. Di Pietro asemel Euroopa Parlamendi liikmeks.
His objection was examined by the Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs at its meeting held on 21 June 2006.
Parlamendi õiguskomisjon vaatas vaide läbi oma 21. juuni 2006. aasta koosolekul.
After establishing that, under Article 12 of the 1976 Act, the objection was inadmissible because it was founded on Italian electoral law, the Committee on Legal Affairs passed a unanimous resolution proposing that the Parliament validate Mr Occhetto’s mandate with effect from 8May 2006.
Olles tuvastanud, et vastavalt 1976. aasta akti artiklile 12 ei ole vaie vastuvõetav, kuna see tugineb Itaalia valimisseadusele, tegi õiguskomisjon ühehäälselt parlamendile ettepaneku kinnitada A. Occhetto mandaadi kehtivust alates 8. maist 2006.
On 3 July 2006, the Parliament confirmed Mr Occhetto’s mandate.
Parlament kinnitas A. Occhetto mandaadi 3. juulil 2006.
By final judgment of 6 December 2006, having the force of res judicata, the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State), allowed the applicant’s appeal against the aforementioned ruling of the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio, amended that ruling and annulled the proclamation of Mr Occhetto as a Member of the European Parliament
6. detsembri 2006. aasta lõpliku otsusega, millel on seadusjõud, rahuldas Consiglio di Stato (riiginõukogu) hageja poolt Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio eespool viidatud otsuse peale esitatud apellatsioonkaebuse, tegi uue otsuse ja tühistas A. Occhetto parlamendiliikmena valituks kuulutamise, mille Itaalia valimiskomisjon
The Consiglio di Stato held, first, that the distinction between withdrawing from an election and withdrawing from a position on a list was illogical, since election is an effect of a position on a list, and withdrawal from an election entails the removal of the individual concerned from the list and whatever effects may follow.
Consiglio di Stato leidis esiteks, et valituks osutumisest loobumise ja järjekohast loobumise eristamine on ebaloogiline, kuna valituks osutumine on järjekoha omamise tagajärg ning valituks osutumisest loobumine tähendab, et asjaomane isik ei ole enam järjestuses koos kõigi sellest tulenevate tagajärgedega.
It held, secondly, that it was contradictory to assert that withdrawal from election as a Member of the European Parliament has no bearing on substitution and that the withdrawing candidate is entitled to withdraw the withdrawal in cases where substitution is called for .
Consiglio di Stato leidis teiseks, et vastuoluline on väide, et valituks osutumisest loobumisel puudub mõju asendamisele ja et Euroopa Parlamendi liikme mandaadist loobuval kandidaadil on asendamise korral õigus loobumine tagasi võtta.
Thirdly and finally, the Consiglio di Stato considered that withdrawal from an election constituted an irrevocable declaration, once the competent body or office to which the announcement of withdrawal is sent has taken note thereof, which has the effect of amending the original list drawn up by the electoral office .
Kolmandaks leidis Consiglio di Stato, et valituks osutumisest loobumine on pöördumatu, kui pädev organ või valimiskomisjon, kellele loobumine esitati, on selle teadmiseks võtnud, mille tagajärjel on muudetud valimiskomisjoni koostatud algset järjestust.
On 29March 2007, the National Electoral Office took note of the aforementioned judgment of the Consiglio di Stato and declared the applicant as Member of the European Parliament for the Italy South constituency, and accordingly revoked Mr Occhetto’s mandate.
Itaalia valimiskomisjon võttis 29. märtsil 2007 Consiglio di Stato eespool viidatud otsuse teadmiseks ja kuulutas hageja parlamendiliikmena valituks Lõuna-Itaalia valimisringkonnas ning tunnistas ühtlasi A. Occhetto mandaadi kehtetuks.
That declaration was notified to the European Parliament, which took note of it in the minutes of the plenary session of 23 April 2007 in the following terms:
Valituks kuulutamisest teavitati parlamenti, kes tegi selle kohta 23. aprilli 2007. aasta istungi protokolli märke järgmises sõnastuses:
‘The Italian authorities had notified Parliament that the announcement of the election of [Mr Occhetto] had been annulled and that the resulting vacancy would be filled by [the applicant].
„Itaalia pädevad ametivõimud teatasid, et [A. Occhetto] valituks kuulutamine tühistati ja et seetõttu vabaks jäänud koht anti [hagejale].
Parliament noted these decisions with effect from 29March 2007 .
Parlament võtab need otsused teadmiseks alates 29.3.2007.
Under Rule 3(2) [of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament], until such time as [his] credentials had been verified or a ruling had been given on any dispute, and provided that [he] had previously made [a] written [declaration] stating that [he] did not hold any office incompatible with that of Member of the European Parliament, … [the applicant] … would take [his] seat in Parliament and on its bodies and would enjoy all the rights attaching thereto.’
Vastavalt [Euroopa Parlamendi kodukorra] artikli 3 lõikele 2, kuni [hageja] volitusi ei ole kontrollitud või vaidluse kohta pole veel otsust vastu võetud ja tingimusel, et [ta] on eelnevalt alla kirjutanud deklaratsioonile selle kohta, et [tal] ei ole ühtki Euroopa Parlamendi liikme ametiga kokkusobimatut ametit, võtab […] [hageja] täievoliliselt parlamendi ja selle organite istungitest osa.”
Meanwhile, by letter of 5 April 2007, which was supplemented by a note of 14 April 2007, Mr Occhetto raised an objection and requested the Parliament to ratify his mandate and not to validate that of the applicant .
Vahepeal esitas A. Occhetto 5. aprilli 2007. aasta kirjas, mida ta täiendas 14. aprilli 2007. aasta märkusega, vaide ja palus parlamendil tema mandaati kinnitada ning jätta hageja mandaat kinnitamata.
By decision of 24May 2007 (‘the contested decision’), adopted on the basis of a report of the Committee on Legal Affairs of 22May 2007 (A6-0198/2007), the Parliament declared that the mandate as Member of the European Parliament of the applicant, whose election had been notified by the competent national authorities, was invalid, and ratified Mr Occhetto’s mandate.
Parlament tunnistas 24. mai 2007. aasta otsusega (edaspidi „vaidlustatud otsus”), mille ta võttis vastu õiguskomisjoni 22. mai 2007. aasta raporti (A6-0198/2007) alusel, hageja – kelle valituks osutumisest olid liikmesriigi pädevad ametivõimud teatanud – parlamendisaadiku mandaadi kehtetuks ja kinnitas A. Occhetto mandaati.
The Parliament also instructed its President to forward that decision to the competent national authorities, to the applicant and to Mr Occhetto.
Parlament tegi ka oma presidendile ülesandeks edastada see otsus liikmesriigi pädevale ametivõimule ning hagejale ja A. Occhettole.
Procedure and forms of order sought by the parties
Menetlus ja poolte nõuded
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 22 June 2007, the applicant brought an action, pursuant to the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC, for the annulment of the contested decision.
Hageja esitas EÜ artikli 230 neljanda lõigu alusel vaidlustatud otsuse tühistamiseks hagiavalduse, mis registreeriti Esimese Astme Kohtu kantseleis 22. juunil 2007.
By separate document lodged at the Court Registry on the same day, the applicant brought this application for interim measures, pursuant to Article 104 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance and Article 242 EC, claiming that the Court should suspend the operation of the contested decision and order the Parliament to pay the costs of these proceedings or reserve the costs.
Hageja esitas Esimese Astme Kohtu kodukorra artikli 104 ja EÜ artikli 242 alusel samal päeval Esimese Astme Kohtu kantseleisse saabunud eraldi dokumendina taotluse ajutiste meetmete kohaldamiseks, paludes vaidlustatud otsuse täitmise peatada ja mõista käesoleva menetlusega kaasnevad kohtukulud välja parlamendilt või lahendada see küsimus edaspidi.
In its written observations, lodged at the Court Registry on 8 July 2007, the Parliament contends, primarily, that the Court should dismiss the application for interimmeasures as inadmissible, alternatively dismiss the application as unfounded and, finally, order the applicant to pay the costs of these proceedings.
Parlament palus 8. juulil 2007 Esimese Astme Kohtu kantseleisse saabunud kirjalikes märkustes esimese võimalusena ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse vastuvõetamatuse tõttu läbi vaatamata jätta, teise võimalusena taotluse põhjendamatuse tõttu rahuldamata jätta ning lõpuks mõista kohtukulud välja hagejalt.
By document lodged at the Court Registry on 5 July 2007, Mr Occhetto applied for leave to intervene in these proceedings in support of the form of order sought by the Parliament .
A. Occhetto palus 5. juulil 2007 Esimese Astme Kohtu kantseleisse saabunud avalduses luba astuda käesolevasse menetlusse parlamendi nõuete toetuseks.
The main parties submitted their observations on the application to intervene within the prescribed period.
Põhimenetluse pooled esitasid oma märkused selle taotluse kohta neile selleks antud tähtaja jooksul.
By order of 13 July 2007, the judge hearing the application for interimmeasures granted Mr Occhetto leave to intervene and invited him to lodge a statement in intervention.
Ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise üle otsustav kohtunik lubas 13. juuli 2007. aasta määrusega A. Occhettol menetlusse astuda ja palus tal oma seisukohad esitada.
In his statement in intervention, lodged at the Court Registry on 29 July 2007, Mr Occhetto claimed that the Court should dismiss the application for interimmeasures and order the applicant to pay the costs or reserve the costs.
Menetlusse astuja seisukohtades, mis saabusid Esimese Astme Kohtu kantseleisse 29. juulil 2007, palus A. Occhetto ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse rahuldamata jätta ja mõista kohtukulud välja hagejalt või lahendada see küsimus edaspidi.
By document lodged at the Court Registry on 2 August 2007, the Italian Republic applied for leave to intervene in these proceedings in support of the form of order sought by the applicant .
Itaalia Vabariik palus 2. augustil 2007 Esimese Astme Kohtu kantseleisse saabunud avalduses luba astuda käesolevasse menetlusse hageja nõuete toetuseks.
The Italian Republic was invited to present its observations at the hearing, the decision as to whether to grant it leave to intervene having been reserved.
Itaalia Vabariigil paluti märkused esitada kohtuistungil, kuna otsus tema lubamise kohta menetlusse astuda otsustati teha edaspidi.
The parties presented oral argument at a hearing held on 12 September 2007 .
Poolte suulised seletused kuulati ära 12. septembril 2007 toimunud kohtuistungil.
At the hearing, the parties were invited to present their oral observations on the application to intervene lodged by the Italian Republic .
Kohtuistungil paluti pooltel esitada suuliselt oma märkused Itaalia Vabariigi menetlusse astumise avalduse kohta.
The parties raised no objections in that regard.
Pooled ei esitanud selle kohta vastuväiteid.
In those circumstances, and in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, applicable to the Court of First Instance by virtue of the first paragraph of Article 53 thereof, the judge hearing the application for interimmeasures granted the Italian Republic leave to intervene; this was noted in the record of the hearing.
Neil asjaoludel ja võttes arvesse Euroopa Kohtu põhikirja artikli 40 esimest lõiku, mida kohaldatakse Esimese Astme Kohtu suhtes vastavalt põhikirja artikli 53 esimesele lõigule, lubas ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise üle otsustav kohtunik Itaalia Vabariigil menetlusse astuda ning tegi selle kohta märke kohtuistungi protokolli.
In its oral observations presented at the hearing, the Italian Republic claimed that the Court should grant the application for interimmeasures .
Itaalia Vabariik palus kohtuistungil esitatud suulistes märkustes ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse rahuldada.
At the hearing, the judge hearing the application for interimmeasures decided to add to the documents in the case an extract from the minutes of the plenary sitting of the Parliament of 23 April 2007, reproducing point 10 thereof, and a copy of the second report of the Parliament’s Committee on Verification of Credentials of 7 January 1983.
Kohtuistungil otsustas ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise üle otsustav kohtunik võtta kohtuasja toimikusse esiteks parlamendi 23. aprilli 2007. aasta istungi protokolli väljavõtte, mis kajastab protokolli punkti 10, ja teiseks parlamendis tegutseva volituste kontrollimise komisjoni 7. jaanuari 1983. aasta aruande koopia.
The parties raised no objection in that regard.
Pooled ei esitanud selle kohta vastuväiteid.
Under the combined provisions of Articles 242 EC and 243 EC, on the one hand, and Article 225(1) EC, on the other, the Court may, if it considers that the circumstances so require, order that application of a contested act be suspended or prescribe any necessary interimmeasures . For that purpose, it takes account of the
Vastavalt esiteks EÜ artiklitele 242 ja 243 nende koostoimes ja teiseks EÜ artikli 225 lõikele 1 võib Esimese Astme Kohus, kui tema arvates asjaolud seda nõuavad, teha vaidlustatud õigusakti kohaldamise peatamise määruse või vajalikke ajutisi meetmeid
DONNICI v PARLIAMENT conditions laid down in Article 104(2) of the Rules of Procedure, as defined by the case-law.
PARLAMENT ette kirjutada. Selles suhtes võtab ta arvesse kodukorra artikli 104 lõikes 2 ette nähtud tingimusi, nii nagu neid kohtupraktikas on täpsustatud.