natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Substitution treatmentis a relatively recent development in most of the new Member States, with most countries launching substitutiontreatment during the 1990s and Estonia introducing its firstprogramme only in 2001. The exception is Slovenia, whichhas had established programmes since 1990 (115).
Asendusravi onsuhteliselt uus enamikus uutest liikmesriikidest: suurem osaneist alustas asendusravi programmidega 1990ndatel jaogrammi alles 2001. aastal.ogrammid on kasvavast koolitamisest, kuigi koolituse tegelikku ulatust ja kasutusel juba 1990. aastast(115
Psychosocial support in substitutiontreatment
Psühhosotsiaalne tugi asendusravis
Social reintegration
Sotsiaalne reintegratsioon
Although it is widely acknowledged that substitutiontreatment should be accompanied by psychosocial support,this is far from being a routine component of treatment.Inthe Czech Republic, Germany and the Netherlands, ashortage of resources limits the delivery of adequatepsychosocial support. And in Norway, although, in theory,
Sotsiaalne r1) kuigi Norras peaks teoreetiliselt igal patsiendil olema oma giks on aani uuringus leiti, et uimastitarbijatest on formaalset haridust saanud suhteliselt
kg406439InsideEN 18/10/04 15:55 Page 65
kg406446InsideET 16/11/04 15:40 Page 65 obleemidega inimeste vajaduste rahuldamine
Figure 19:Quality assurance of drugrelated treatment
Joonis 19: Uimastiravi kvaliteedi tagamine muude oskuste arendamisest.
Minimum requirements of services
TRavikeskuste akrediteerimine
) aim at providing drug users (former or current) with a placeto live and/or subsidising the rent.
Sotsiaalne rkasutatav vastumeede probleemsele uimastitarbimisele jae ja aruandlus selles osas puudulikumad.
Social reintegration is a less well-established response toproblem drug use than is treatment and, consequently,monitoring and reporting in this field are also more patchy.Some Member States report that this area needs much moreattention and financial resource (Germany, Estonia,Finland).
reintegratsioon siiski suurselle kaasamisele riiklikesse narkoennetuse strateegiatesse,lisaks on hakatud seda toetama ka rahaliselt (Kreeka, Iirimaa,
Treatment demand data
Andmed ravinõudluse kohta
A centrally situated register or database keeping track of clients and/or treatment provision.Sources:Reitox national reports.
Narkootikumide ja Narkomaania Euroopa Tteabekeskuste aruanded.
Characteristics of clients demanding drugtreatment
obleemsed opiaatide- ja kokaiinitarbijad
However, the agedistribution observed across the European data set is notuniform and shows peaks among those aged over 39 andunder 20.
11 9 nooremad (pr sellistesse linnapiirkondadesse, kus uimastiprobleemidesinevad koos suure hulga muude sotsiaalsete ja
)See Figure 16 OL: Overview of social reintegration provision.)See Figure 17 OL: New clients in treatment by year in some EU countries.)See TDI_Tbl 1 and TDI_Tbl 2 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.)See TDI_Tbl 5 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.
)eintegreerimise tagamisest.)Vt joonis 17 OL: Uute ravi saavate patsientide hulk Euroopa Liidu riikides aastate kaupa.))
Annual report 2004: the state of the drugs problem in the European Union and Norway are living with children; evidence suggests that the childrenof drug users may face a range of difficulties.
Aastaaruanne 2004: Narkoprobleemide olukord Euroopa Liidus ja Norras
Drugproblems also make parenting particularly challenging(Murphy-Lawless, 2002).
Uimastiprobleemid muudavad lapsevanemaksolemise eriti keeruliseks (Murphy-Lawless, 2002).
Drug of use predominate.
liikmesriikide puhul, kus uimastiprobleem on ka sageli
In the TDI, both the primary drug for which treatment issought and the secondary substance of use, if any, arerecorded.
Tarbitavad uimastid egistreeritud nii peamine ravile soovijate hulgas suur
Although male drug users predominate in all Europeancountries, the male to female ratio varies considerablybetween countries, ranging from 3:1 to 6:1.
uimastitarbijad, on meeste ja naiste suhtarv uimastitarbijate, ulatudes 3 : 1 kuni 6 : 1.Riikidevahelised erinevused kajastavad uimastiprobleemi
Differencesbetween countries again reflect the type of drug problem aswell as region (the highest proportions of female drug usersare found in northern European countries and the new Member States) and client age.
Keeruline on saada selget pilti uimastitest, mille tarvitamisedutakse, sest uimastitarbijad oopa riikides ja uutes liikmesriikides) ja klientide vanust.
It is interesting to note that most clients seeking treatmentfor heroin, cocaine and hypnotics or sedatives consumethese drugs daily, whereas for other drugs frequency of useshows a wider distribution.
Joonis 20: Uute uimastiravipatsientide osakaal, kelle peamiseksuimastiks on heroiin, kokaiin ja kanep, 1996–2002 ravile herseotud prkuna aga muude uimastite tarvitajatel kasutussagedusvarieerub r obleemide kontekstis
NB:Countries providing data are: CZ, DK, DE, EL, ES, NL, SL, SK, FI and SE(except FI data missing 1996/97, SE data missing 2000).Figures are summed over contributing countries for each year.Sources: Reitox national reports 2003.
Allikas: gmised: CZ, DK, DE, EL,ES, NL, SI, SK, FI (v.a FI andmed aastatest 1996/1997) ja SE (v.a 2000.aasta andmed).Osalevate riikide iga-aastased arvud liidetakse kokku.Narkootikumide ja Narkomaania Euroopa Tgu riikideteabekeskuste aruanded 2003.
kg406439InsideEN 18/10/04 15:55 Page 67
kg406446InsideET 16/11/04 15:40 Page 67 obleemidega inimeste vajaduste rahuldamine
Figure 21:New clients attending drug treatment in 2002:distribution by different primary drugs
Joonis 21: Uimastiravi saavad uued patsiendid 2002.aastal:jaotumus peamiselt tarbitavate eri uimastite kaupa
In most countries, opiates (largely heroin) remain the maindrug for which clients seek treatment and typically accountfor between 40 and 90%of all demands for treatment.However, EU countries can be broadly divided into threegroups depending on the extent to which the treatmentpopulation is characterised by those with heroin problems:
Opiaadid Enamikus riikides on opiaadid (enamasti heroiin) dujatest on harilikult 40%–90%. Eur
60 below 40%— Czech Republic, Hungary, Finland,Sweden;
60 osa ravilolijatest moodustavad heroiiniprobleemidega
• over 70%— Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg,Slovenia, the United Kingdom.
• eeka, Itaalia, Leedu, Luksemburg,
Cannabis is in overall terms the second most frequentlycited drug in reports on those entering treatment.
0 uimastitest teisel kohal.
This isespecially true for new clients (Figure 21), of whom nearlyone third (29.5%) are recorded as having a primarycannabis problem.
See kehtib just uute klientide kohta(joonis21), kellest ligi kolmandikul (29,5%) on peamiseltobleemid.
The proportion of people seekingtreatment for cannabis varies widely between countries (125
suures ulatuses(125
CzechRepublic (
TšehhiVabariik (
Lithuania (
Leedu (
Sweden (
Rootsi ( erinev
Opiates
Opiaadid
Other stimulants
Muud stimulandid
Hypnotics and sedatives
Uinutid ja rahustid
NB:Total number of cases: 42568.(1) Outpatient treatment only.Sources:Reitox national reports 2003.
Märkused:Juhtumite koguarv: 42568.(1) Ajavahemiku 1996–1999 kohta on haiglaravi andmed;ajavahemiku 2000–2002 kohta on ambulatoorse ravi andmed.Allikas:Narkootikumide ja Narkomaania Euroopa Tgu riikideteabekeskuste aruanded 2003.
Other stimulants
inimesed.
Stimulants other than cocaine are infrequently reported asthe primary reason for attending drug treatment except inthe Czech Republic, Finland and Sweden, where theyaccount for between a quarter and more than half of allprimary treatment demands.
Muid stimulante, v.a kokaiin, mainitakse uimastiravileeisiti on olukord Tšehhi Vabariigis, Soomes ja Rootsis, kus need moodustavad
In the Czech Republic, morethan 50%of reported treatment demands relate to a primary methamphetamine problem.
Slovakkias peaaegu 10%, Saksamaal 7%, Taanis 6% ja
In all other countries the proportion is
Tšehhi V dujatest metamfetamiini-probleemidega
Annual report 2004: the state of the drugs problem in the European Union and Norway even lower. Data from 2002 also revealed an increase inthe number of stimulant users who reported injecting, from14%in 2000 to 27%in 2002, although this groupremains relatively small in terms of absolute numbers(Figure 22).
Aastaaruanne 2004: Narkoprobleemide olukord Euroopa Liidus ja Norras otsendilt 2000.aastal 27protsendile 2002. aastal, kuigi absoluutarvudes22).
Figure 22:Distribution of route of administration for heroin,cocaine and other stimulants among attendees at outpatienttreatment services: 2000–02
Joonis 22: Heroiini, kokaiini ja muude stimulantide kasutavate patsientide hulgas:2000–2002
Other stimulants
Suitsetamine/sissehingamine
Inject
Märkused:
NB:Data available for DK, DE, EL, ES, IE, NL, FI, SE and UK (2002 data from Ireland were not available).Base numbers of total numbers reporting route of administration are shown.Sources:Reitox national reports (2001, 2002, 2003); TDI data (2000, 2001, 2002)from outpatient treatment centres.
Narkootikumide ja Narkomaania Euroopa Tgu riikideteabekeskuste aruanded (2001, 2002, 2003); TDI andmed(2000, 2001, 2002) ambulatoorse ravi keskustest.
Chapter 8Crime and prison issues
8. peat ü kk Kuritegevuse ja vanglaga seotud küsimused
Drugrelated crime
Uimastitega seotud kuritegevus kuidas.
However, ‘reports’ of drug law offences decreased
Ajavahemikus 1997–2002 kasvas uimastialaste oopa
Psychopharmacological crimes: crimes committed underthe influence of a psychoactive substance;
•Majanduslik-kompulsiivsed kuriteod: kuriteod, mis
Economic compulsive crimes: crimes committed in orderto obtain money (or drugs) to support a drug habit;
) ja 2002. aastal Eestis(128
Finally, in Luxembourg, Portugal and Norway (130), a majority of offences relate to both drug
uimastivajaduse rahuldamiseks.
• use/dealing and drug trafficking.
Enamikus Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikides on suurem osa
Drug law offences: crimes committed against drug(andother related) legislations.
• pannakse toime ebaseaduslike uimastiturgudetoimimise raames ebaseadusliku uimastilevitamise ja gil (129
In all countries for which data were available, with theexception of Portugal, the proportion of all drug lawoffences accounted for by offences related to druguse/possession for use increased over the five-year period
Tšehhi Vuimastialaste seaduste rikkumistest seotud vahendamise ja
Data on the first three categories of crime are rare in the EU, and those that are available come from ad hoc localstudies that are generally not routinely conducted anddifficult to extrapolate from.
•Uimastialaste seaduste rikkumised: kuriteod, millekorral rikutakse uimastialaseid (ja muid sellevaldkonnaga seotud) seadusi.
In Portugal, the proportion of use-related offences started todecrease in 2000, one year before drug use and possession for use were decriminalised (in July 2001) (132).
Esimese kolme kategooria kuritegude kohta on Euroopa gis, Portugalis ja) on enamik rikkumisi seotud nii uimastite
Increaseswere particularly marked (twofold or more) in the Czech
Norras (130 eldusi teha.
In most of the Member States, cannabis is the illicit drugmost often involved in reported drug law offences (Table 4).In the countries where this is the case, cannabis-relatedoffences account for 34%(Sweden) to 87%(France) of alldrug law offences.
“Aruanded“ (126 ortugal, suurrikkumiste hulgas viie aasta jooksul, 1997–2002,rikkumiste osakaal, mis olid seotud uimastite tarbimisega / gil (131 viise, erinevusi prioriteetides ja kriminaalkohtuasutustepoolt konkreetsete kuritegude uurimiseks eraldatud gata Belgias, Luksemburgis ja Sloveenias, ning kuni 2001.aastani Iirimaal.
Heroin is the drug most frequentlyinvolved in Lithuania and Luxembourg, where it accountsfor 15%and 51%, respectively, of all drug offences, whilein the Netherlands offences involving ‘hard drugs’ (133)
Portugalis hakkas uimastite tarbimisega registreerimistavade osas, st mida registreeritakse, millal ja
(The term ‘arrests’ was used in annual reports until 2001.)
) su (politsei ettekandedemalt metodoloogiliseds kasutati kuni
The remaining drug law offences are
) ortugalis on see, et uimastite tarbimine gil
(129 (130 related to ‘drug use’ alone.
(129 (130 itega seotud
Chapter 8: Crime and prison issues
8. peatükk: Kuritegevuse ja vanglaga seotud küsimused tarbimise eesmärgil kuulutati kriminaalkorras mittekaristatavaks (juulis 2001)(132
Table 4: Drug mostly involved in ‘reports’ fordrug offences in the EU countries and Norway
Tabel 4: Uimastitega seotud õigusrikkumistearuannetes enamasti esinevad uimastid Euroopa Liidu riikides ja Norras
Proportion (%) Cannabis Heroin
Osakaal (%)Kanep
28 were available (135), except Hungary and the United
Enamikus liikmesriikides on aruannetes hõlmatuduimastialaste õigusaktide rikkumistega kõige sagedaminiseotud ebaseaduslikuks uimastiks kanep (tabel 4).
Kingdom, where it increased (136), and Lithuania, where ithas fluctuated since 2000 (137).
Sellistesriikides on kanepiga seotud 34% (Rootsi) – 87%(Prantsusmaa) kõigist uimastialaste õigusaktiderikkumistest.
2 observed for cocaine-related offences, which as aproportion of all drug offences have increased since 1997in all countries providing data, except Germany, Lithuania,Luxembourg and Hungary, which reported downward
Alates 1997. aastast on suurenenud kanepiga seotudõigusrikkumiste osakaal Saksamaal, Hispaanias,Prantsusmaal, Luksemburgis, Ungaris ja Portugalis, samason see Belgias, Itaalias, Leedus, Hollandis, Sloveenias ja Rootsis jäänud stabiilseks.
Drug users in prison
), välja arvatud
National routine information on the type and pattern ofdrug use among prisoners is rare. Much of the dataavailable in the EU come from ad hoc studies carried out atlocal level using samples of prisoners that vary considerablyin size and in terms of selection processes.
Belgia Tšehhi Vabariik Taani Saksamaa Eesti Kreeka Hispaania Prantsusmaa Iirimaa Itaalia Küpros Läti Leedu Luksemburg Ungari Malta Holland Austria Poola Portugal Sloveenia Slovakkia Soome Rootsi Ühendkuningriik Norra osakaal kasvas(136), ning Leedu, kus see on kõikunudalates 2000. aastast(137).
In addition,prisons studied are sometimes not representative of theprison system as a whole, and a lack of repeat surveysprevents analysis of trends in most countries. These factorsmake extrapolation of results very difficult.
Vastupidist suundumust võib täheldada kokaiiniga seotud õigusrikkumiste puhul, milleosakaal uimastitega seotud õigusrikkumiste hulgas onkasvanud alates 1997. aastast kõigis andmeid edastanudriikides, välja arvatud Saksamaa, Leedu, Luksemburg ja
As in the general population,
Uimastite tarbijad ja vangla
For an exact definition for each country, refer to the methodologicalnotes on definitions of ‘reports’ for drug law offences in the 2004 statistical bulletin.data not available.Among all drugs mentioned (alone or not).Among main drugs.Among all offences broken down by drug (for some offences, a breakdown by drug is not available).Among offences for drug dealing/trafficking (since offences for druguse/possession for use are not criminalised).Data under ‘heroin’ refer to ‘hard drugs’ (defined as drugs which poseunacceptable public health risks, such as heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, LSD).Some offences involve both cannabis and ‘hard drugs’ and have notbeen included here, which explains why the total is less than 100%.This proportion is underestimated as it represents offences for each drugalone, e.g. offences for cannabis only (it does not include offences for‘cannabis + other drug(s)’).Among persons given a summary fine by the prosecutor or sentenced
Märkused:Täpset määratlust iga riigi kohta vt 2004. aasta statistikabülletään,uimastitega seotud õigusrikkumiste aruannete mõistetemetodoloogilised märkused.–: andmed ei ole kättesaadavad.(1) Kõigi mainitud uimastite hulgas (eraldi või kombineeritult).(2) Peamiste uimastite hulgas.(3) Kõigi õigusrikkumiste hulgas, eri uimastite kaupa (mõnedeõigusrikkumiste korral puudub jaotus uimastite kaupa).(4) Uimastite vahendamise/äriga seotud õigusrikkumiste hulgas (sestõigusrikkumised, mis on seotud uimastite tarbimise / omamisegatarbimise eesmärgil, ei ole kriminaalkuriteod).(5) Andmed “heroiini“ all osutavad “tugevatele uimastitele“ (heroiin,kokaiin, ecstasy, LSD – uimastid, mis kujutavad vastuvõetamatutohtu inimeste tervisele). Mõned õigusrikkumised on seotud niikanepi kui “tugevate uimastitega“ ning ei ole siinkohal hõlmatud –seepärast on summa alla 100%.(6) Osakaalud on alahinnatud, sest näidatud on õigusrikkumised igauimasti kohta eraldi, näiteks ainult kanepiga seotud õigusrikkumised(see ei hõlma rikkumisi “kanep + muu(d) uimasti(d)“).(7) Isikute hulgas, kellele prokurör on määranud trahvi või kes onsaanud kohtuliku karistuse.Allikas:riikide teabekeskused.
cannabis is the most frequently reported illicit drug, withlifetime prevalence rates among inmates of between 11%and 86%.
Riikides regulaarselt kogutavat teavet vangide seastarbitavate uimastite liigi ja kasutamise struktuuri kohta onvähe.
Prisoners’ lifetime prevalence of cocaine (andcrack) use is 5–57%and that of heroin 5–66%.
Palju kättesaadavaist andmeist Euroopa Liidus
Hungary, the Netherlands (only cannabis and ‘hard drugs’), Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom (until 2000 only).(136)Data for the United Kingdom were available until 2000 only.(137)See DRCrime_Tbl 6 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.(138)See DRCrime_Tbl 7 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.(139)See Prison_Tbl 1 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.
)Seadus uimastite tarbimise ja tarbimise eesmärgil omamise kuulutamise kohta kriminaalkorras mittekaristatavaks võeti vastu 2002. aasta novembrisning jõustus juulis 2001.)Hollandis on “tugevad uimastid” määratletud kui uimastid, mis kujutavad vastuvõetamatut ohtu inimeste tervisele, näiteks heroiin, kokaiin, ecstasyja LSD.)Vt DRCrime_Tbl 5, statistikabülletään 2004.)Uimastitega seotud õigusrikkumiste ajalise jaotuse uimastite kaupa on esitanud järgmised riigid: Belgia, Saksamaa, Hispaania, Prantsusmaa,Iirimaa, Itaalia, Leedu, Luksemburg, Ungari, Holland (ainult kanep ja “tugevad uimastid”), Austria, Portugal, Sloveenia, Rootsi ja Ühendkuningriik(ainult kuni 2000. aastani).)Ühendkuningriigi kohta olid andmed ainult kuni 2000. aastani.)Vt DRCrime_Tbl 6, statistikabülletään 2004.)Vt DRCrime_Tbl 7, statistikabülletään 2004.
Annual report 2004: the state of the drugs problem in the European Union and Norway
Aastaaruanne 2004: Narkoprobleemide olukord Euroopa Liidus ja Norras oluliselt oma suuruse ja valikumeetodi poolest.
In the EU, the prevalence of regular drug use or dependence some studies have reported values as low as 1%or ashighas 69%.
Inglismaal kuulub vanglatetervishoid tervishoiuministeeriumi haldusalasse ja Walesis eldes on vangide seas suhteliseltrohkem uimastitarbijaid.
Where comparable data are available, they show thatyoung offenders are less likely to inject than adults and thatamong the prison population women are more likely to inject than men (143).
Nakkushaigused vanglates ja nende ennetamine vangidest selliseks ebaseaduslikuks uimastiks, mida vangidon elu jooksul tarvitanud.
Based on several studies in the EU,
Kokaiini (ja crack’i) on elujooksul tarvitanud 5%–57% vangidest ja heroiini 5%–66%.
Bird and Rotily (2002) have shown that around one third ofadult male prisoners are drug injectors.
esineb Euroopa Liidus 8%–73% vangidest(140
Themajority of drug users reduce or stop their drug use onadmission to prison.
Vanglad: tõsine väljakutse rahvatervisele narkootiliste ainete kuritarvitamise probleemi, kuid seda
This raises issues of access to sterile injectionequipment and hygienic sharing practices among the prisonpopulation and the potential spread of infectious diseases ifthese matters are not addressed.
vanglates viibivate naiste puhul suurem kui meestel(Mitme Eur d ja vange uimastite tarbimist harjunud viisil ning osa alustab astavalt gu
Prisons are a highrisk setting for the spread of suchdiseases. Among the practices that have proven to be ableto reduce infectious diseases are the treatment of sexuallytransmitted diseases and the provision of condoms,substitution treatment, vaccination programmes and needleand syringe exchange programmes.
Narkootikumide ja Narkomaania Euroopa T andmetele on 0,2%–34% vangidest(144 vanglas olles uimasteid ja 10%–36% tarbis seal uimasteid regulaarselt (141
In Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Austria and Sloveniasubstitution treatment is available in all prisons.
jagamisharjumuse kohta vangide seas ning potentsiaalsenakkushaiguste leviku kohta, kui nendele probleemidele
It comprises threeconsecutive weekly injections with a booster after12months and results in 99%protection at 13 months(Zuckerman, 2003).
Paljudel vangidel on tervishoiuteenustele piiratudjuur
In France, thisresponsibility was transferred to the Ministry of Health aslong ago as 1994.
V ge puudub neil tihti juurvangla tervishoiuteenuste isolatsiooni.
In England and Wales, healthcare in prisons iswithin the remit of the Department of Health and the National Assembly for Wales respectively (in privatesectorprisons, it is within the remit of the Home Officeforboth regions).
Neid probleeme on em juur piiravad nakkushaiguste levikut, kuuluvad sugulisel teelnakkavate haiguste ravimine ja kondoomide jagamine,asendusravi, vaktsineerimisprogrammid.
Infectious diseases in prisons and their prevention
Ilmnemas on suundumus anda vastutus vangla ohkem.Belgias, Taanis, Hispaanias, Austrias, Sloveenias ja vanglates.
Lifetime prevalence of injecting drug use among prisoners isgenerally reported to be between 15%and 50%; however,
Belgia, Taani, Luksemburg ja Norra
)See Prison_Annex in the 2004 statistical bulletin.)See Prison_Tbl 3 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.)See Table 10 OL: More recent prison drugs strategies, ministerial directives and service standards in the EU and Norway.)See Prison_Tbl 2 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.)See Prison_Tbl 4 in the 2004 statistical bulletin.
))))Vt tabel 10 OL: Vanglate viimase aja uimastistrateegiad, ministeeriumide direktiivid ja teenindusstandardid Euroopa Liidus ja Norras.))
kg406439InsideEN 18/10/04 15:55 Page 73
kg406446InsideET 16/11/04 15:40 Page 73 uimastiraviprotsessis (kohtunik, pr algust tavaliselt eelvangistuses viibivatel vangidel.Enamikus Saksamaa liidumaades, Hollandis, Sloveeniasning Itaalia suur guliseks tarbimise juurde. Uimastikohtud on asutatud Iirimaal ja ogramme
Chapter 8: Crime and prison issues
samasugused algatused.
2002, needle and syringe exchange programmes wereimplemented in 27 penitentiary centres in Spain and12970 syringes were distributed with no incidentsreported.
Selles programmis suunatakse eldusele, et sellised programmid on teostatavadekaudu edasikanduvate viiruste levik, kusjuures puuduvadgetestelvana arrell, 2002) ogramm 27 kinnipidamisasutuses kusjuures vahejuhtumeid ei esinenud.
The evaluation of the Dublin drug court (Farrell, 2002)concluded that that there were strong indications that thedrug court would result in cost savings to the criminal justicesystem over time.
Ptegutsevate uimastikohtute areldusele, et ravile suunamist rakendava uimastikohtu
The Ministry of Justice has extended thearea of Dublin over which the drug court has jurisdiction.
Hambur ogramm veel struktuuriabi / rahalise abi mehhanisme, mis peaksid olema
In Josefstadt Prison, Vienna, a pilot project is in preparation, and in Luxembourg it is intended to provide injection equipmentfor drug addicts in prisons under the healthcareprogramme(145).
Viinis Josefstadti vanglas onettevalmistamisel pilootprojekt ja Luksemburgis kavatsetakse tervishoiuprogrammi raames(145
Thisyear’s annual report will therefore deal with a specificaspect of alternative punishments for drug users.
Uimasteid tarbivad õigusrikkujad:alternatiivid vanglale giks on oopa karistusmenetlusega seotud konfliktid.
Emerging initiatives: drug courts and mediation between victim and offender
uimastitarbijate alternatiivsete karistuste spetsiifilist tahku.
One of the more significant developments isout-of-court mediation.
Uued algatused: uimastikohtud ning vahendus ohvrija kurjategija vahel
In the Netherlands, the police offer first-time offendersbetween the ages of 12 and 18 the option of makingreparations for their crimes through mediation.
12–18esmakoroma kuritegu lepitusmenetluse kaudu.