natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The sample involved different types of asset and fraud mechanisms (false customs values, false prices and false declara-tions of origin).
Valitud juhtumid h÷lmasid erinevaid varasid ja olid seo-tud erinevate pettuseskeemidega (valeandmete esitamine tolliväärtuse, hinna ja päritoludek-laratsioonide kohta).
The Commission observed a steady improvement in the effective rate of debt recovery (2 % for the sample examined in 1994, 12 % in 1998 and 15 % in 2003).
Komisjon on täheldanud, et v÷lgade tegelik sissen÷udmismäär on pide-valt kasvanud (1994. aastal 2%, 1998. aastal 12% ja 2003. aastal 15% uuritud valimist).
Member States are also responsible for entering all cases of detected fraud and irregularities in the OWNRES database if they have a potential financial impact of traditional own resources over EUR 10 000.
Samuti peavad liikmesriigid registreerima andmed k÷ikide tuvastatud pettustest ja eeskirjade eiramise kohta andmebaasis OWNRES, kui nende finantsm÷ju traditsioonilistele oma-vahenditele v÷ib ületada 10 000 eurot.
Because it is to be expected that customs debts over EUR 10 000 will appear not only in OWNRES but also in the B accounts, the Commission, in 2003, compared the two.
Kuna need juhtumid peavad üldjuhul kajastuma ka B-raamatupidamisarvestuses, siis v÷rdles komisjon neid andmeid omavahel.
The results of this comparison were not very satisfactory.
Tulemus v÷iks olla parem.
When the Commission did the exercise in 2004 significant improvements became evident.
Kui komisjon v÷rdles uuesti andmeid 2004. aastal, oli v÷imalik näha olulist edasiminekut.
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2028/2004 (60) obliges Member States to treat as irrecovera-ble amounts of traditional own resources in excess of EUR 50 000 which have not been recovered within five years from the request for payment became definitively enforceable.
Määruses (EÜ, Euratom) nr 2028/200460 on sätestatud, et liikmesriigid peavad kuulutama mittesissen÷utavateks traditsiooniliste omavahendite summad, mis ületavad 50 000 eurot ja mida ei ole tagasi saadud viie aasta jooksul pärast kuupäeva, mil maksetaotlus on põõra-tud l÷plikult täitmisele.
This means that all such cases (including very difficult to recover debts arising from fraud and irregularities) must be presented to the Commission for evaluation.
See tähendab, et sellised juhtumid (kaasa arvatud pettuse ja eeskirjade eiramisega seotud v÷lad, mida on väga keeruline tagasi n÷uda) tuleb edastada komis-jonile hindamiseks.
Direct expenditure
Otsetoetused
The new financial regulation
Uus finantsmäärus
The new financial regulation (61) significantly improves the effectiveness of recovery of direct expenditure.
Uue finantsmäärusega61 parandatakse oluliselt otsetoetuste sissen÷udmise t÷husust.
From now on, systematic use will be made of offsetting (Article 73), whereby any claim that the Communities have on a debtor who himself has a claim on the Communities that is confirmed, quantified and due will be offset as to an equivalent amount.
Nüüd kasutatakse korrapäraselt tasaarvestamist (artikkel 73): ühenduste n÷udeid tasaarvestatak-se v÷lgnikele samaväärsete n÷uetega, mis on v÷lgnikel ühenduste suhtes ning mis on kind- lad, kindlasummalised ja kuuluvad maksmisele.
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000, OJ L 130, 31.5.2000.Commission report on the follow-up of traditional own resources in cases of fraud and irregularities of 7.1.2005, COM(2004) 850.OJ L 352, 27.11.2004.Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 248, 16.9.2002.
Määrus (EÜ) nr 1150/2000, (EÜT L 130, 31.5.2000).Komisjoni aruanne traditsiooniliste omavahendite järelevalve kohta pettuse ja eeskirjade eiramise korral, KOM(2004) 850, 7.1.2005.ELT L 352, 27.11.2004.N÷ukogu määrus (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1605/2002 (EÜT L 248, 16.9.2002).
Article 72(2) also confirms that the institution can `formally establish an amount as receiv-able from persons other than States by means of a decision which is enforceable'.
Samuti on artikli 72 l÷ikes 2 sätestatud, et institutsioon v÷ib ‡täitmisele põõratava otsusega kindlaks määrata summasid, mis on saada teistelt isikutelt peale riikideƒ.
This possibility was provided for in Article 256 of the EC Treaty, but no implementing regulations had been issued.
See säte on ette nähtud juba asutamislepingu artiklis 256, kuid vastavaid rakenduseeskirju ei olnud seni täpsustatud.
In addition, the new financial regulations introduce automatic collection of late payment interest for any debt not repaid on the due date (62), and significantly increase the amount
62, suurendades oluliselt tagasimakstavat summat
Contractual warranties for better contract management
Tagatised parandavad lepingute haldamist
Payment of advances or granting of pre-financing without consideration at the time of payment constitutes an appreciable risk for the Communities' financial interests.
Ettemakse sooritamine v÷i eelfinantseerimine ilma tagatiseta on oluline risk ühenduste fi-nantshuvidele.
However, such payments are an essential tool for carrying out certain actions that meet Community policy objectives.
Siiski on see teatavate meetmete elluviimiseks hädavajalik, et saavutada ühenduse poliitikavaldkondades püstitatud eesmärgid.
The new financial regulations, and in particular the regulation laying down detailed rules for its implementation, provide for a number of measures that miti-gate this risk.
Uues finantsmääruses, eriti määru-ses, millega kehtestatakse selle rakenduseeskirjad, on ette nähtud teatavad meetmed selle riski vähendamiseks.
Thus, in the cases provided for by the implementing rules, the contractors or beneficiaries must provide a guarantee in advance before receiving pre-financing.
Nii on rakenduseeskirjades nendeks puhkudeks kehtestatud, et lepin-guosalised v÷i abisaajad peavad enne eelmakse saamist esitama tagatise.
The Commission's departments, through standard contracts or conventions (including agreements with candidate and third countries in the area of foreign aid or participation in Community programmes), ensure that effective provisions on recovery are included.
Komisjoni talitused kontrollivad, et tüüplepingud v÷i kokkulepped (kaasa arvatud kandi-daatriikidega v÷i kolmandate riikidega s÷lmitud kokkulepped, mis on seotud välisabi v÷i ühenduse programmides osalemisega) sisaldaksid ka t÷husaid meetmeid sissen÷udmiste kohta.
Recovery by joining a civil action to criminal proceedings and precautionary measures under Member States' legislation
Sissen÷udmine tsiviilhagi kaudu ja ettevaatusabin÷ud liikmesriikide ÷igusaktides
The study published in last year's report (64) showed that, in the majority of Member States, the Commission is entitled to join a civil action to ongoing criminal proceedings with a view to obtaining damage to secure recovery of Community entitlements related to direct expenditure.
Eelmise aasta aruandes avaldatud uurimusest64 selgus, et enamikus liikmesriikidest saab komis-jon ühenduste otsetoetuste tagasisaamiseks esitada kahjutasu ja intresside sissen÷udmiseks tsi-viilhagi.
Launching a civil action within criminal proceedings is considered an effec-tive instrument to facilitate the Commission's efforts to recover debts in the field of direct expenditure.
Tsiviilhagi esitamist kriminaalmenetluse raames peetakse t÷husaks vahendiks, et h÷l-bustada komisjoni j÷upingutusi otsetoetustega seotud v÷lgade tagasisaamisel.
It offers several advantages, including the shortening of legal proceedings.
Selles peitub mitu eelist, eelk÷ige menetluse tähtaja lühendamine.
In Member States having common law systems (65), although the Commission would not be entitled to launch `civil action within criminal proceedings', it would nevertheless be allowed to make a request for a compensation order.
Kuigi komisjon ei saa tava÷igusega ÷igussüstee-miga riikides65 esitada tsiviilhagi, saab ta taotleda tasaarvestamist.
The 2003 report also established that the Commission may usually apply for precautionary measures (66) as from the investigation phase of criminal proceedings.
2003. aasta aruandest selgus ka, et komisjon v÷ib üldjuhul kriminaalmenetluse uurimiseta-pis taotleda ettevaatusabin÷ude66 v÷tmist.
In 2004, the Commission wished to make a more detailed assessment of the conditions under which it may represent the Community in legal proceedings relating to direct ex-penditure.
2004. aastal soovis komisjon p÷hjalikumalt analüüsida tingimusi, mille alusel ta saaks esin-dada ühendust otsetoetustega seotud kohtumenetlustes.
The questionnaire submitted to the Member States took the form of a case study
K÷ik vastused on esitatud komisjoni talituste tõõdokumendis.
Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, Article 86.The rate of late payment interest applicable is the reference rate of the European Central Bank plus 7 percentage points for service and supply contracts and the reference rate plus 3.5 percentage points in other cases.
Komisjoni määruse (EÜ, Euratom) nr 2342/2002 (millega kehtestatakse n÷ukogu määruse (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1605/2002 üksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad) artikkel 86 (EÜT L 357, 31.12.2002).Maksetähtpäevaks maksmata saadaolevate summade viivise määr on määr, mida Euroopa Keskpank kohaldab oma peamiste refinantseerimistoimingute suhtes, mida suurendatakse seitsme protsendi v÷rra, kui saadaolev summa tule-neb tarne- ja teenuslepingust, ning kolme ja poole protsendi v÷rra k÷ikidel muudel juhtudel.
This is a significant increase with respect to the previous rate (the reference rate plus 1.5 percentage points).COM(2004) 573.Ireland, United Kingdom.
V÷rreldes varasema mää-raga, on tegemist olulise suurenemisega: varem v÷eti aluseks viitemäär, mida suurendati 1,5 protsendipunkti v÷rra.KOM(2004) 573.Iirimaa ja Ühendkuningriik.Ettevaatusabin÷ud on meetmed, mida prokuratuur v÷i kohtunik v÷ib ette kirjutada, et takistada kahtlustataval oma varasid enne l÷pliku kohtuotsuse tegemist laiali jaotada.
Precautionary measures are those measures which the prosecutor or the court may order to prevent the defendant from dispersing his assets before the court reaches its decision.
Ettevaatusabin÷ud h÷lmavad uurimise all oleva isiku varade külmutamist ja arestimist.Luksemburg ja Malta.
They include the freezing and seizing of the defendant's assets.
Samuti tuleb märkida, et teatavate liikmesriikide vastused ei olnud piisavalt üksikasjalikud, et nende alusel oleks olnud v÷imalik määrata kindlaks olulised andmed, mida komisjon peab oma hagis esitama.
2 7 involving an economic operator defrauding the Commission.
Vaatamata sarnasustele, on eri riikide ÷igussüsteemides kehtestatud väga erinevad tingi-mused, mille alusel komisjon saaks tsiviilhagi algatada.
Two Member States were not able to provide answers to this part of the questionnaire (67).
See toob veelgi selgemini välja va-jaduse tihedaks koostõõks komisjoni ja kohtuorganite vahel.
The full text of the responses is available in the form of a Commission services' working document.
Samuti oli komisjonil 2004. aasta aruande p÷hjal v÷imalik ÷ppida paremini tundma riikide ÷iguses kehtestatud tingi-musi, mis on vajalikud selleks, et esitada taotlus ettevaatusabin÷ude v÷tmiseks.
This highlights the need for the Commission to have close cooperation with national judicial authorities.
Soomes ja Portugalis v÷ib prokuratuur sellise menetluse algatada, kui ta peab seda asjakohaseks.
The 2004 report also gives the Commission a better under-standing of the conditions under which applications for precautionary measures should be made following national legislations.
Sel juhul ei pea komisjon avaldust esitama. Soome r÷hutas aga, et kui komisjon n÷uab kahju hüvitamist, toetudes faktidele, mis ei sisaldu prokuratuuri esitatud süüdistusaktis, peab komisjon esi-tama avalduse, mis sisaldab k÷nealuseid asjaolusid koos t÷estusmaterjaliga.
Civil action within criminal proceedings.
Samuti tuleb teatavates liikmesriikides esitada oma avalduse toetuseks k÷ik faktid68ja/v÷i kahjutasuks taotletav summa69.
The application for `civil action within criminal proceedings'.
Lisaks peab teatavates liikmesriikides70olema avalduses selges÷naliselt esitatud p÷hjuslik seos pettuse ja ühenduse eelarvele tekitatud kahju vahel.
The majority of Member States' answers show that the claim must be filed by the Commission.
Ainult kaks liikmesriiki71 nimetasid v÷imalust esitada hagi pärast kohtuistungi algust.
In Sweden, the prosecutor is entitled to submit the claim.
N÷uded t÷endite kohta tsiviilhagi esitamisel.
In Finland and Portugal, it can be made by the prosecutor if he considers it appropriate.
Üheski liikmesriigis ei seata piiranguid t÷endi-te esitamise kohta: seda v÷ib teha nii tunnistajate ülekuulamise näol kui ka kirjalikult.
In this case, there will be no need for the Commission to make an application.
Sa-mas v÷ivad kohtud vabalt otsustada esitatud t÷endite piisavuse üle.
Finland pointed out that, if the Commission applies for damages on the basis of facts which are not shown in the charge drawn up by the prosecutor, those facts should be presented in the claim together with the supporting evidence.
See tähendab, et üksi komisjoni esitatud kahjuga seotud t÷estusmaterjal, kaasa arvatud volitatud eksperdi koos-tatud auditiaruanne, ei ole tingimata iseenesest piisav lepinguosalise süü t÷estamiseks.
In certain Member States, it is also necessary to state all the facts supporting the object of
Kuigi t÷endite esitamiseks ei esitata üldjuhul eritingimusi, nimetasid kolm liikmesriiki tea-tavaid piiranguid, mis on seatud audiitori koostatud aruandele (m÷nikord n÷utakse, et
68) and/or the amount sought for compensation (
72 v÷i kohtu määratud ekspert
Additionally, in some the claim (
Itaalias kehtib menetlusosalistele ja seega ka komisjonile arvuline piirang: kohtusse ei v÷i kutsuda tunnistama üle kahe eksperdi.
Member States (70), the link of causality between the fraud and the loss to the Community budget must be clearly demonstrated in the application.
Teistes liikmesriikides ei ole audiitorite aruannetele kehtestatud eritingimusi, kuid neid hinnatakse teatavate eritingimuste alusel.74
Requirements as to evidence in relation to civil action within criminal proceedings.
Ettevaatusabin÷ud.
All the Member States who answered apply the rule of evidence by all means, whether by a witness statement or in a written report.
K÷ikides liikmesriikides, kus on v÷imalik tsiviilhagi esitada, on luba-tud ka taotleda ettevaatusabin÷ude v÷tmist.
However, the courts are also bound to apply the rule of the free assessment of evidence.
Ettevaatusabin÷ude taotleja.
This means that no piece of evidence in relation to the damage produced by the Commission, even a report of a certified auditor, might be in it-self sufficient enough to prove an infringement of a criminal provision by the contractor.
Üldjuhul peab kahjukannataja ehk siis komisjon esitama taot- luse prokuratuuri v÷i kohtunikule.75 Ainult kaks liikmesriiki teatasid, et nii komisjon kui ka prokuratuur v÷ivad taotleda menetluse ajal ettevaatusabin÷ude v÷tmist.76
(Sometimes, it is necessary that the report be written by a registered expert (72), or one that has been appointed by the court (73)).
Ettevaatusabin÷ude taotlemine.
In the Czech Republic, the admissibility of the statement is subject to inclusion of specific clauses in the claim.
Taotluses n÷utavad andmed erinevad liikmesriigiti oluli-
The expert must be a court expert or a person who is known to possess adequate knowledge in a given field.Thus, in Sweden, the report must be presented in person during the hearings.
Ekspert peab olema kohtu juures tõõtav ekspert v÷i konkreetses valdkonnas pädev isik.Rootsis tuleb aruanne kohtuistungil isiklikult ette kanda.
Initiator of precautionary measures.
Teatavates riikides77 ei ole selleks erin÷udeid kehtestatud.
The general rule is that it is the damaged party, and therefore the Commission, which must initiate the application before the public prosecu- tor or the court (75).
Teistes riikides aga peavad esitatud andmed olema väga üksikasjalikud ja sisaldama teavet taotluse ÷igusliku aluse kohta, ettevaatusabin÷usid ÷igustavate asjaolude kirjeldust, t÷estusmaterjali vara kadumise kohta ning tõõettev÷tja teadaolevate varade kirjeldust ja nende asukohta.
Only two Member States reported that it is possible for both the Commission and the prosecutor to apply for a precautionary measure during the trial (76).
Slovakkias n÷u-takse, et taotlus sisaldaks ettepanekut ettevaatusabin÷u v÷tmiseks.
Slovakia imposes the condition that the application includes a proposal of a pre-cautionary measure.
L÷puks tuleks märkida, et ettevaatusabin÷udega samaväärsed meetmed on olemas ka teatavates tava÷igusega liikmes- riikides.
Finally, it should be noted that an equivalent of precautionary measures may be found in certain Member States who have
Nendeks on arestimisotsused79 ja konfiskeerimisotsused80
In 2002, the total arrears of recoverable amounts relating to irregularities in the EAGGF Guarantee Section were estimated at EUR 2.2 billion, according to data provided by Member States under Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 (81).
Vastavalt andmetele, mis liikmesriigid edastasid määruse (EMÜ) nr 595/9181 artiklite 3 ja 5 kohaselt, oli 2002. aastal EAGGF tagatisrahastu valdkonnas eeskirjade eiramisega seotud sissen÷udmata v÷lgade kogusumma hinnanguliselt 2,2 miljardit eurot.
In its communication of December 2002 (82), the main aim of which was to improve recovery, the Commission decided to set up a Recovery Task Force (RTF) made up of officials from OLAF and the Agriculture and Rural Development DG.
Oma 2002. aasta detsembri teatises82, mille eesmärk oli eelk÷ige parandada sissen÷udmist, otsustas komis-jon luua vastava tõõrühma (TFR - Task Force Recouvrement), mis koosneb OLAFi ja p÷l-lumajanduse peadirektoraadi tõõtajatest.
The Recovery Task Force was charged with clari-fying the situation of unrecovered debt and drawing up decisions on financial liability under the formal clearance procedure in the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
TRFi ülesanne oli selgitada välja tagasisaamata summade suurus ja valmistada ette otsused rahalise vastutuse kohta ametliku kontrollimi-se ja heakskiitmise menetluse raames EAGGF tagatisrahastu valdkonnas.
It started its audit work in 2003 for unrecovered amounts dating from before 1999 exceeding EUR 500 000 each.
Enne 1999. aastat tagasisaamata summadega seotud juhtumeid, mille puhul kahju ületas 500 000 eurot, hak-kas rühm auditeerima 2003. aastal.
This exercise, involving nine Member States, revealed that the total amount of unre-covered debt was EUR 765 million (83).
Üheksat liikmesriiki h÷lmanud auditi käigus selgus, et tagasisaamata kogusumma ulatus 765 miljoni euroni.83 2004. aasta l÷pus sai p÷llumajandu-se peadirektoraat alustada raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollimist ja heakskiitmist.
At the end of 2004, the clearance procedure was initiated by the Agriculture and Rural Development DG; formal letters under Article 8 of
Vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 1663/95 (rahalise kohustuse kohta) artiklile 8 saadeti asjaomastele riikidele ametlikud kirjad koos komisjoni ettepanekutega rakendamist vajavate finantskor-rektsioonide kohta.
In the pre-trial proceedings, the prosecutor may secure the claim even without application by the injured if the protection of the latter's interest calls for it and, in particular, if there is a danger of omission.Belgium, Greece, Italy, Austria.Finland is the only reported exception to this rule: application for a precautionary measure such as a transfer prohibi-tion or seizure will not require any evidence of that risk.
Austria, Belgia, Itaalia ja Kreeka.Ainult Soome teatas erandist selle p÷him÷tte suhtes: selliste ajutiste meetmete rakendamise puhul nagu üleandmise keeld v÷i arestimine ei n÷uta ohu t÷estamist.
In principle, it is enough to claim that the risk is rather likely.
P÷him÷tteliselt piisab, kui taotluses kinnitatakse, et oht on küllalt t÷enäo-line.
However, the application should describe how the risk is manifesting itself in the case in question.England and Wales.Scotland.OJ L 67, 14.3.1991.COM(2002) 671 final.This amount does not include 32 cases communicated before 1999 for an amount exceeding EUR 500 000, which revealed inconsistencies when the communications were compared with the results of the audit.
Sellegipoolest tuleb taotluses kirjeldada, milles oht konkreetsel juhul väljendub.Inglismaa ja Wales.Ùotimaa.EÜT L 67, 14.3.1991.KOM(2002) 671 (l÷plik).K÷nealune summa ei h÷lma 32 juhtumit, millest teatati enne 1999. aastat ja kus asjassepuutuv summa ületas 500 000 eurot.
Priority will be given to dealing with these cases in 2005.
Nende juhtumite puhul tuvastati teatistes sisalduva teabe ja auditi tulemustest v÷rdlemisel vastuolusid.
Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 on financial liability were sent to the nine Member States in question with the financial corrections proposed by the Commission.
TRFi tõõ tulemusena paranes liikmesriikide edastatud andmete tõõtlemine.
The RTF also began the audits of around 3 400 cases for an amount of under EUR 500 000 each, which had been communicated before 1999 and not recovered to date (the total financial impact was estimated at around EUR 200 million).
See tulemus on koosk÷las tahteavaldusega ‡parandada ühise p÷llumajanduspoliitika raames eeskirjade vastaselt tehtud maksete kohta kättesaadavate andmete kvaliteetiƒ.
The RTF will verify the data sent in 2005; the formal clearance proce-dure will begin after completion of the verifications and any necessary supplementary audits.
Sellise kohustuse v÷ttis komisjon oma vastustes kontrollikoja eriaruandele nr 3/200484.
In the area of the Structural Funds, the recovery of unduly paid amounts due to irregular-ity or fraud is carried out by Member States.
Struktuurifondide puhul peavad liikmesriigid tagama nende summade sissen÷udmise, mis on makstud p÷hjendamatult eeskirjade eiramise v÷i pettuse tagajärjel.
The recovery of those amounts at Commu-nity level can be done by reduction or cancellation of the financial contribution with the possibility of a transfer of funds to other operations when the programme concerned has not yet been closed.
K÷nealuste summa-de tagasimaksmiseks komisjonile v÷ib vähendada liikmesriigi rahalist toetust v÷i selle tü-histada, kusjuures rahalised vahendid v÷ib paigutada ümber muudest meetmete rahastami-seks, kui asjaomast programmi ei ole l÷petatud.
The programmes co-financed by the Structural Funds are multiannual and based on interim payments.
Struktuurifondidest kaasrahastatavad programmid on mitmeaastased ja neid rahastatakse vahemaksete teel.
Recovery of amounts unduly paid may take place before or after conclusion of the programme.
Alusetult makstud summasid v÷ib sisse n÷uda enne v÷i pärast program-mi l÷ppemist.
For the 1994«99 programming period, the deadline for presentation of the request for final payment to the Commission was 31 March 2003.
Ajavahemikuks 1994«1999 kehtestatud programmi tõõperioodi puhul oli komisjonile l÷ppmaksete taotluste esitamise tähtpäev 31. märts 2003.
The Commission's authorising and managing de-partments (Regional Policy DG, Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG, Agriculture and Rural Development DG, Fisheries and Maritime Affairs DG), assisted by the European Anti-Fraud Office, are responsible for administrative and financial follow-up once these programmes have been concluded.
Sellel ajavahemikul kaasrahastas ühendus ligikaudu 1000 programmi kogusummas ligi 159 miljardit eurot.85Komisjoni eelarvevahendeid käsutavad talitused (regionaalpoliitika, tõõh÷ive-, p÷lluma-janduse ja kalanduse peadirektoraadid) koos OLAFiga tagavad k÷nealuste programmide l÷petamiseks nende haldus- ja finantsjärelevalve.
This follow-up is based in particular on the communications, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 (86), of irregularities by Member States that have been recorded in the External Communications Registry database.
Seda järelevalvet teostatakse eelk÷ige vas- tavalt määrusele (EÜ) nr 1681/9486liikmesriikide edastatud ja eriandmebaasi (External Communications Registry) sisestatud teatiste alusel eeskirjade eiramise kohta.