natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annex 1› Contact points at the Commission and in the Member States for the `technical regulations' aspect of the Directive Annex 2› Contact points for the `standards' aspect of the Directive (Commission, European standardisation bodies, contacts at national level)
1. lisa › Direktiivi ¶tehniliste normide• aspektiga tegelevad kontaktasutused komisjoni juures ja liikmesriikides 2. lisa › Direktiivi ¶standardite• aspektiga tegelevad kontaktasutused (komisjon, Euroopa ja rahvuslikud standardiorganisatsioonid)
Throughout the past 20 years, the scope of the Directive has been gradually broadened to cover all industrial, agricultural and «sheryproducts.Directive98/48/ECextendedthesystemtoin-clude Information Society services since a need was felt for a mechanism for supervising this new and rapidly evolving «eld,while leaving economic operators and the Member States alike as much freedom as possible to prevent obstacles to technolog-ical developments in this sector.
Viimase 20 aasta vêltel on direktiivi reguleerimisala jêrk-jêrgult laienenud kýikide tûûstus-, pýllumajandus- ja kalandustoode-te hýlmamiseks. Direktiiviga 98/48/Eâ laiendati s Ÿ s t e e m i info-Ÿhiskonna teenuste hýlmamiseks, sest oli tekkinud vajadus selle uue ja kiiresti areneva valdkonna kontrollimehhanismi jê-rele, jêttes samas ettevýtjatele ja liikmesriikidele výimalikult palju vabadust selles sektoris tehnoloogilise arengu týkete vêl-timiseks.
In 2000 the European Union launched the Lisbon Strategy › an ambitious agenda for reform whose aim was to make the EU the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based econo-my in the world by 2010.
2000. aastal algatas Euroopa Liit Lissaboni strateegia › ambit-sioonika reformikava, mille eesmêrgiks oli muuta ELi majandus aastaks 2010 kýige konkurentsivýimelisemaks ja d Ÿ n a a m i l i s e - m a k s teadmistepýhiseks majanduseks.
At its half-way mark, in 2005, the Com-mission proposed a renewed approach to this strategy focus-ing on growth and jobs.
Poolel teel, 2005. aastal tegi komisjon ettepaneku strateegia uuendatud lêhenemisviisi kohta, milles keskendutakse tûûkohtade arvu suurendamisele.
The Commission identi«edimprovingthe quality of European and national regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market as a key challenge in this respect.
Komisjon tegi kindlaks, et sellega seoses on pýhivêljakutseks siseturu sujuvat toimimist tagava Euroopa ja siseriikliku regu-latsiooni kvaliteedi parandamine.
One of the most di/cultandimportanttasksinthemanage-ment of the internal market is preventing the adoption of na-tional technical regulations and standards which create new barriers to trade.
Kýnealune kord aitab kaasa subsidiaarsuspýhimýtte rakenda-misele, seda nii siseriiklike ýigusaktide parandamise výimalda-mise kui ka tegeliku Ÿhtlustamisvajadusega valdkondade kind-laksmêêramise kaudu.
Twenty years after its entry into force the N o - t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e ( D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C , c o d i « e d b y D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C ) has proved to be a fundamental internal market in-strument.
Nii saab otsustusprotsess toimuda kýige sobivamal tasandil, mis výimaldab detsentraliseerimist ja kind-lustab nii poliitiliste, kultuuriliste kui piirkondlike traditsioonide mitmekesisust.
This procedure contributes to the application of the subsidi-arity principle, both through enabling improvements to be made to national legislation and identifying areas where har-monisation is really necessary.
âks kýige raskemaid ja têhtsamaid Ÿlesandeid siseturu korral-damisel on uusi kaubandustýkkeid loovate siseriiklike tehnilis-te normide ja standardite vastuvýtmise vêltimine.
The Directive has provided an insight into national regulatory initiatives, has led to the crea-tion of a genuine discussion forum, clearing the way for joint action to strengthen the internal market and has recently con-tributed to the establishment of the enlarged internal market of 25 Member States.
20 aastat pêrast selle jýustumist on teavitusdirektiiv (direktiiviga 98/34/Eâ kodi«tseerituddirektiiv83/189/EMâ)osutunudsiseturukorraldamise peamiseks vahendiks.
The mechanism set up by the original Directive 83/189/EEC is based on the agreement of the Member States to inform and consult each other and the Commission before they adopt technical regulations and to modify their drafts if necessary.
Algse direktiiviga 83/189/EMâ loodud mehhanism pýhineb liikmesriikide kokkuleppel Ÿksteise ja komisjoni teavitamise ja nendega konsulteerimise ning vajadusel eelnýude muutmise kohta enne tehniliste normide vastuvýtmist.
By means of transparency and the exchange of information at the legislative proposal stage, the Member States have agreed to prevent the emergence of new obstacles to the single market.
Liikmesriigid on kokku leppinud uute týkete vêltimises Ÿhtsel turul lêbipaistvu-se ja teabevahetuse abil ýigusaktide ettevalmistamise etapis.
Furthermore, this mechanism is a tool of better regulation since it allows the d i . e r e n t c o m p e t e n t a uijt h o r i t i e s , bo t h a t C o m mstu - n i t y and national levels, to prevent problems ex ante thus avoid-ing costly and controversial infringement proceedings which can only be launched ex post.
Lisaks sellele on kýnealune mehhanism vahend valdkonna pa-remaks reguleerimiseks, mis výimaldab pêdevatel asutustel nii Ÿhenduse kui ka siseriiklikul tasandil vêltida probleeme eelne-valt, hoidudes nii kulukatest rikkumismenetlustest, mida saab alustada ainult tagantjêrele.
The exchange and gathering of information is also an e.ectivewayofensuringthatnationalbest practices become known and are used as a model for oth-er regulatory initiatives.
Teabevahetus ja teabe kogumine on ka týhus moodus siseriiklikest parimatest tavadest teavita-miseks ning nende kasutamiseks muude seadusandlike alga-tuste mudelina.
A pre-adoption screening procedure for all draft technical regula-tions and standards relating to products was therefore established and gradually expanded.
Sel eesmêrgil loodi kýikide toodetele kehtestatavate tehniliste normide ja standardite vastuvýtmiseelse lêbivaatamise kord, mida hiljem jêrk-jêrgult laiendati.
The Commission, the Member States, in-dustry and individuals thus have an open window upon technical activities, which enables them to eliminate at source any barriers to the free movement of goods.
Seega on komisjonil, liikmes-riikidel, tûûstusel ja eraisikutel avatud aken Ÿlevaate saamiseks tehnilistest tegevustest, mis výimaldab neil kýrvaldada mis ta-hes kaupade vaba liikumise týkked juba nende allika juures.
Following a 2002 Commission Report which analysed barriers to the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establish-ment in the Internal Market, the Commission's services are work-ing on the possible extension of Directive 98/34 to cover services other than Information Society services.
Pêrast komisjoni 2002. aasta aruannet, mis sisaldas a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s i teenuste osutamise vabaduse ja asutamisvabaduse týkete kohta siseturul, tûûtavad komisjoni talitused direktiivi 98/34/Eâ výimaliku laiendamise suunas ka muude kui i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste hýlmamiseks.
Industry, as well as the Commission and the Member States, is involved in the noti«cationprocedure.Besidesbeingabletoexamine legislation in their own countries, enterprises in the Member States have the opportunity of examining legislation proposed by countries to which they export or wish to export or to which they provide or envisage to provide Information Society services.
Teavitamismenetlusse on kaasatud tûûstus, komisjon ja liik-mesriigid. Lisaks výimalusele tutvuda oma riigi ýigusaktide eel-nýudega on liikmesriikide ettevýtetel výimalus tutvuda nende riikide seadusandlike ettepanekutega, kuhu nad ekspordivad výi soovivad eksportida výi kus nad osutavad výi kavatsevad osutada i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuseid.
As a consequence, they can plan to adapt their products or services to the new requirements; they can also identify protectionist elements in the drafts and take ac-tion to have them eliminated.
Sellest tulenevalt on neil výimalik plaanida oma toodete výi teenuste kohandamist uute nýuetega, samuti on neil výimalik teha kindlaks kaitse-elemen-did ja výtta meetmeid nende kýrvaldamiseks.
In order to use the system to full advantage, industry must therefore know how it works and how to access the noti«edtexts.
SŸsteemi kasutamiseks parima tulemusega peab tûûstus see-ga teadma, kuidas see toimib ja kuidas saada juurdepêês teata-vaks tehtud tekstidele.
This may be done by means of a visit to our public data-base at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ enterprise/tris.
Seda on výimalik teha k Ÿ l a s t a d e s meie avalikku andmebaasi jêrgmisel aadressil: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/enterprise/tris.
This booklet is one of a number of Commission initiatives de-signed to bring Community law closer to those who use it.
Kêesolev b r o þ Ÿ Ÿ r on Ÿks paljudest komisjoni algatustest Ÿhen-duse ýiguse lêhendamiseks selle kasutajatele.
My hope is that its publication will help to enhance the exchange of information, dialogue and cooperation which has constitut-ed a new community culture.
Ma loodan, et kêesolev t r Ÿ k i s aitab edendada Ÿhenduse uue kultuuri aluseks olevat teabevahetust, dialoogi ja koostûûd.
Sabine Lecrenier Head of Unit Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry
Sabine Lecrenier,ettevýtluse ja tûûstuse peadirektoraadi osakonnajuhataja
Introduction: Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market
Sissejuhatus: direktiiv 98/34/Eâ, vahend lêbipaistvuse tagamiseks siseturul
At the beginning of the 1980s the Commission, basing itself on a Court of Justice ruling known as the `Cassis de Dijon' judg-ment, launched a new policy designed to complete the inter-nal market on the basis of three concepts:
1980. aastate alguses algatas komisjon ¶Cassis de Dijoni• nime all tuntud Euroopa Kohtu otsusele pýhinedes uue poliitika, mil-le eesmêrk oli siseturu vêljakujundamine kolme idee alusel:
The «rstpartrelatestotheprocedurefortheprovisionofinfor-mation on new national initiatives which should lead to the formulation of national standards between the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies, name-ly CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation) and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and the European Commission.
Esimene osa kêsitleb uute rahvuslike standardite koostamiseks rahvuslikest algatustest teavitamist rahvuslike standardiorga-nisatsioonide, Euroopa standardiorganisatsioonide › CENi (Eu-roopa Standardikomitee), CENELECi (Euroopa Elektrotehnika Standardikomitee) ja ETSI (Euroopa Telekommunikatsiooni Standardiinstituut) › ning Euroopa Komisjoni vahel.
The Commission has given the European standardisation bodies responsibility for implement-ing this procedure, by means of an annual contract.
Euroopa standardiorganisatsioonid on komisjoniga sýlmitud aastaste lepingutega seda korda rakendama nimetatud.
› Acceptance in each Member State of products lawfully man-ufactured in the rest of the Community (`mutual recogni-tion');
›Ÿhenduses mujal seaduslikult valmistatud toodete aktsep-teerimine igas liikmesriigis (¶vastastikune tunnustamineƒ),
› Harmonisation limited to important economic sectors cover-ing, in particular, health, safety and the environment;
Direktiivi teine osa on adresseeritud nendele liikmesriikidele, kes on nýustunud osalema regulatiivse valdkonna vastastiku-ses lêbipaistvuse ja jêrelevalve s Ÿ s t e e m i s . Algatus oli omalaad-ne mitmeti:
The second part of the Directive is addressed to the Member States who have agreed to take part in a reciprocal transpar-ency and monitoring system in the regulatory «eld.Thisinitia-tive was original in several ways:
›Ÿhtlustamine, mis piirdub oluliste majandussektoritega, hýl-mates eelkýige tervishoidu, tûûohutust ja keskkonnahoidu,
› A prevention-based approach to monitoring national regu-lations.
›ennetamispýhine lêhenemisviis siseriiklike ýigusnormide jê-relevalve teostamiseks.
› The system is of a preventive nature: information is provided when technical regulations relating to products or rules on Information Society services are still at the draft stage, and may be amended in order to conform with the principles of the internal market.
› s Ÿ s t e e m on olemuselt ennetav: teavitatakse siis, kui toodete výi i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste kohased tehnilised normid on eelnýuetapis ning neid on výimalik siseturu pýhimýtetele vastavuse saavutamiseks muuta,
Since 1984, Directive 83/189/EEC which, following codi«ca-tion later became Directive 98/34/EC, has laid down a preven-tive mechanism, the scope of which has been progressively extended.
Alates 1984. aastast on kodi«tseerimisejêrelhiljemdirektiiviks98/34/Eâteisenenud direktiiviga 83/189/EMâkehtestatud ennetav mehhanism, mille ulatust on jêrk-jêrgult laiendatud.
Today, the Member States of the European Union are obliged to notify to the Commission and to the other Member States any draft technical regulation concerning products and Infor-mation Society services before they are adopted in national law.
Praegu on Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigid kohustunud teavitama komisjoni ja teisi liikmesriike kýikidest toodete ja i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n - n a teenustega seotud tehniliste normide eelnýudest enne nende vastuvýtmist siseriiklike ýigusaktidena.
The concept was revolutionary at the time and has remained so - to the extent that the Commission is examining whether it could be extended to other areas.
Kontseptsioon oli revolutsiooniline selle loomise ajal ja on seda siiani › sellisel mêêral, et komisjon kaalub selle laiendamist teis-tele valdkondadele.
› It is not only the Commission which can examine and mon-itor the texts through the operation of standstill periods, but also all the Member States; the latter have acknowl-edged the advantages of a procedure which allows for re-ciprocal i n ‹ u e n c e o v e r t h e i r l effg i s l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s .
› s Ÿ s t e e m výimaldab Ÿhtlustamisalgatusi silmas pidades Ÿhenduse tasandil toimuvate arutelude hýlbustamiseks ka siseriiklike ýigusaktide eelnýude teatavaks ajaks peatamist, lisaks sellele výimaldab selline ýigusloome jêlgimine lihtsa-malt kindlaks mêêrata tegelikud Ÿhtlustamisvajadused.
T h e T r e a - t y itself merely made provision for retrospective monitoring by the Member States, through the use of the more cum-bersome infringement procedures which are rarely applied between Member States.
Teabevahetust teostatakse vastavalt kahesuunalisele menetlu-sele, mis jagab direktiivi kaheks eristuvaks, kuid teineteist têien-davaks osaks.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
Lisaks sellele kasutab komisjon direktiivi 98/34/Eâ ýppevahen-dina liikmesriikide ýigusaktide stiili kohandamise eesmêrgil.
Through this instrument, the Commission not only succeeds in removing provisions which are contrary to Community law, but also contributes to the formulation of provisions to be written into national legislation to ensure that economic operators are fully informed of their rights and permit application in practice of the principle of `mutual recognition' contained in the Euro-pean Court of Justice (ECJ) interpretation of Articles 28 et seq. of the Treaty.
Lisaks kýnealuse vahendi kasutamisele komisjoni poolt Ÿhen-duse ýigusega vastuolus olevate sêtete kýrvaldamiseks aitab komisjon selle abil kaasa riigisisestesse ýigusaktidesse lisatava-te sêtete koostamisele, mille eesmêrk on tagada ettevýtjate têielik informeeritus nende ýiguste osas ning výimaldada asu-tamislepingu artiklit 28 ja jêrgmisi kêsitlevas Euroopa Kohtu (ECJ) týlgenduses sisalduva vastastikuse tunnustamise pýhi-mýtte praktilist rakendamist.
The system, which got o.toaslowstart,hasgainedmomen-tum and has provided the Commission, the Member States and enterprises with a window on the activities of national authori-ties and standardisation bodies in the technical «eld(rulesre-lating to product composition, labelling, name, testing, etc., as well as rules relating to product life cycle through to disposal).
Aeglaselt kêivitunud s Ÿ s t e e m on n Ÿ Ÿ d s e k s hoogustunud ja andnud komisjonile, liikmesriikidele ja ettevýtetele výimaluse jêlgida liikmesriikide ametiasutuste ja standardiorganisatsioo-nide tegevusi tehnikavaldkonnas (toote koostis, mêrgistus, nimi, katsetamine jms eeskirjad, aga ka ýigusnormid, mis regu-leerivad toote e l u t s Ÿ k l i t kuni selle kýrvaldamiseni).
The scope of the Directive has been progressively extended, so that it now covers all agricultural and industrially manufactured products and takes account of an ever growing number of pro-visions, in particular to prevent any measures which indirectly require compliance with technical speci«cationsfromslippingthrough the net.
Direktiivi reguleerimisala on jêrk-jêrgult laiendatud, nii et n Ÿ Ÿ d hýlmab see pýllumajandus- ja tûûstustooteid ning selles on výetud ar-vesse Ÿha suurenevat sêtete arvu, eelkýige kaudselt tehniliste-le kirjeldustele vastavuse nýudeid esitavate meetmete raken-damise vêltimiseks.
In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
1998. aastal laiendati korda direktiiviga 98/48/Eâ i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste hýlmamiseks.
According to this principle, each Member State must accept the sale in its territory of any product lawfully manufactured or marketed in another Member State, subject, where legitimate interests, such as health and safety questions are at stake, to these products guaranteeing an equivalent level of protection.
Samuti on jêrk-jêrgult laiendatud direktiivi geograa«listulatust.Direktiivi 98/34/Eâ, mida rakendati osaliselt EFTA riikides juba alates 1990. aastast, on samuti osaliselt laiendatud TŸrgile sel-le riigiga sýlmitud assotsiatsioonilepingu alusel.
The corollary to this acceptance of products from the rest of
Direktiivis on ette nêhtud ka Euroopa Nýukogu konventsiooni mudel.
Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
Liikmesriike ja komisjoni teavitatakse sellistest ýigusnormidest direktiiviga 98/34/Eâ kehtestatud teavitamismenetluse kohaselt.
The Directive has also provided a model for a Convention of the Council of Europe.
Lisaks sellele týlgendatakse Eâ-TŸrgi assotsiatsiooninýukogu 22. detsembri 1995. aasta otsust 1/95 tolliliidu lýppfaasi raken-
Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 c o d i « e d D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C a n d a l l i t s s u bse q u e n t a mffe n d - mffe n t s while Directive 98/48/EC of 20 July 1998 amended Directive 98/34/EC.
22. juuni 1998. aasta direktiiviga 98/34/Eâ kodi«tseeritidirektiiv83/189/EMâ ja kýik selle hilisemad muudatused, 20. juuli 1998. aasta direktiiviga 98/48/Eâ muudeti direktiivi 98/34/Eâ.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
1990. aasta novembris jýustunud EFTA liikmesriikide ja EMâ vaheline leping, milles on sêtestatud tehnilistest normidest teavitamise kord.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
Alates 1. jaanuarist 1994 kohaldatav Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna leping, millega liideti hiljem vajalike kohandustega direktiiv 83/189/EMâ.
Switzerland, though not a signatory to this Agreement, continues to apply the procedure for the exchange of in-formation.
Þveits, kes ei ole selles lepingus osa-line, jêtkab teabevahetuse korra kohaldamist.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ C Vol. 16 No C 113, 24.12.1973) and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the «nalphaseofthecustomsunion(OJL35,13.2.1996,p.1).
Euroopa M a j a n d u s Ÿ h e n d u s e ja TŸrgi vaheline assotsiatsioonileping ( E â T C 16. kûide C 113, 24.12.1973, inglise versioon) ja Eâ-TŸrgi assotsiatsiooninýukogu 22. detsembri 1995. aasta otsus 1/95 tolliliidu lýppfaasi rakendamise kohta ( E â T L 35, 13.2.1996, lk 1).
Convention No 180 of the Council of Europe on Information and Legal Co-operation concerning `Information Society Services'.
Tuleb rýhutada, et Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingu asjakohaseid sêtteid kohaldatakse ainult ¶lepinguosalistelt pêrinevate toodete suhtes• ning ei kohal-data sellest tulenevalt ainult turustatavate toodete suhtes seal.
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
guks ning on seega kýnealust teenust kêsitleva Ÿhenduse ýi-gusakti alusel vastuvýetamatud, nagu nêiteks i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste korral, mille osutaja ei pea sisenema teenuse saaja liikmesriigi territooriumile.
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
damise kohta, mis sêtestab Ÿhendusse importimise koguselis-te piirangute ja samavêêrse toimega meetmete t Ÿ h i s t a m i s e Eâ ja TŸrgi vahel, sêtteid nende rakendamise ja kohaldamise ees-mêrgiga tolliliiduga hýlmatud toodete suhtes vastavalt Euroo-pa Kohtu asjakohastele otsustele Eâ asutamislepingu sêtete, eelkýige artiklite 28›30 kohta.
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Tulenevalt teavitamismenetluse kohaldamise ulatuse laienda-misest i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuseid kêsitlevatele nýuetele tagab direktiiv 98/34/Eâ alates 1999. aasta augustist uute týkete vêl-timise asutamisvabadusele ja i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste vabale liikumisele, nêhes ette mehhanismi selle valdkonna uute sise-riiklike ýigusaktide ja Eâ asutamislepingu artiklite 43 ja 49 Ÿhil-duvuse a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s i m i s e k s .
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
Seepêrast on i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste valdkonna siseriiklike nýuete eelnýude lêbivaatamisel olnud komisjoni peamiseks eesmêrgiks nêiteks kohtuotsustel pýhinev vastuseis mis tahes siseriiklikule regulatiivsele lêhenemisviisile, mille eesmêrk on Ÿldiste territooriumivêliste meetmete kohaldamine, mis ei eris-ta teavitanud liikmesriigi ettevýtjaid nendest, kes soovivad sel-lises liikmesriigis teenuseid osutada, kuigi nad ei ole seal asuta-tud. Komisjon on taganud ka selle, et plaanitud siseriiklikud ýigusnormid ei kehtestaks ettevýtjatele ja kasutajatele asjatuid výi liialdatud kohtu- výi halduskulusid.