natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The relevance of the Daphne objectives and their permanence are also evidenced by the growth of the funds requested by proposers between 1997 and 2002, indicating how impor-tant the demand and the needs are and remain.
Daphne eesmêrkide asjakohasus ja jêtkuvus ilmneb ka 1997.›2002. aasta jooksul laekunud rahastamistaotluste arvu suurenemises, viidates nýudmise ja vajaduse olemasolule.
The e . e c t i v e n e s s o f t h e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe i s a s s e s s e d b y t h e e x t e n t t o w h i c h t h e o u tp uijt s a n d impacts contribute to the achievement of the Daphne objectives.
Daphne programmi týhusust saab hinnata selle kaudu, mil mêêral vêljundid ja mýjud aitavad kaasa Daphne eesmêrkide saavutamisele.
For each project, a link was made between its outputs and the Daphne objectives they support.
Iga projekti puhul loodi side selle vêljundite ja toetatavate Daphne eesmêrkide vahele.
Out of 699 outputs, 601 strongly or very strongly support the Daphne objectives as follows:
699 vêljundist toetasid 601 tugevalt výi vêga tugevalt Daphne eesmêrke:
Studies, research or"""data collection"""
" andmete kogumine
Recognition"""and reportingon violence""
Vêgivalla avastamine
Information sources"""
1 7 ja sellest teatamine
Graph 1: Support of outputs to programme's objectives
Joonis 1: vêljundite toetus programmi eesmêrkidele
N = 601 outputs with high or very high contribution: iconferences, seminars, workshops; istudies, reports and books; i"information materials; i"guidelines, training packages, manuals; iwebsites, CDs and CD-ROMs
N = 601 vêljundit kýrge výi vêga kýrge panusega: i"konverentsid, seminarid, ýpikojad; i"uuringud, aruan-ded ja raamatud; i"infomaterjalid; i"suunised, koolituspaketid, kêsiraamatud; i v e e b i l e h e k Ÿ l j e d , CDd ja CD-ROMid.
Graph 1 should be interpreted as follows: 15 % of the outputs contribute to the objective `sup-port to multi-disciplinary networks', and they are composed of 38 % of `conferences, seminars and workshops', 16 % of `studies, reports and books' and 11 % of `information materials'.
Daphne kogemuse tulemused âlaltoodud joonist peaks týlgendama jêrgmiselt: 15% vêljunditest aitavad kaasa eesmêrgi ¶Toetus erialadevýrgustikeleƒ saavutamisele ning nendest omakorda 38% moodustavad ¶Kon-verentsid, seminarid ja ýpikojadƒ, 16% ¶Uuringud, aruanded ja raamatudƒ ja 11% ¶Teabealli-kadƒ.
Main impacts
Peamised mýjud
Programme⁄s objectives
Programmi eesmêrgid
Programme⁄s meta-objectives
Programmi metaeesmêrgid
Improved networking capacities 63 %
Paranenud koostûûvýime:63%
Support for multidisciplinary networks
Heade tavade vahetus
Exchange of good practices
Euroopa vastus v ê g i v a l l a k Ÿ s i m u s t e l e lêbi koostûû,heade tavade vahetamiseja uuringute
Adoption of good practices66 %
Heade tavade omandamine:66%
European response to issues of violence through networking, exchange of good practices and studies
Uuringud, teadustûû výiandmete kogumine
Studies, research or data collection
Suurenenud asjatundlikkus:64%
Improved means and/oraccess to assistance 57 %
Paremad vahendid ja/výi ligipêês abile: 57%
Prevention / protectionfrom violence
Vêgivalla preventsioon / kaitse selle eest
Increased awareness of issues of violence
Suurenenud teadlikkus vêgivalla ja lýppabisaajateolukorra kohta:76%
Visibility / discussion of violence 67 %
Vêgivalla nêhtavus/arutelu:67%
Recognition and reporting of violence
Vêgivalla tuvastamine jasellest teada andmine
Openness to experiencefrom other countries: 52 %
Avatus teiste riikidekogemustele: 52%
Graph 2: Contribution of impacts to programme's objectives
Joonis 2: mýjude panus programmi eesmêrkidele
Note: Percentages in the `Main impacts' boxes are the frequencies of projects having recorded such an impact.
(Protsendimêrgid ¶Peamiste mýjudeƒ lahtrites têhistavad, kui tihti projektid sellist mýju on têheldanud.)
Only the most important impacts (above 45 % of frequencies) are displayed and only the main relations with objectives are shown, in the interests of readability.
Loetavuse huvides on toodud vaid têhtsamad mýjud (esinemissagedusega Ÿle 45%) ja peamised seosed eesmêrkidega.
It is no surprise that the proportion of outputs supporting a given objective is commensurate with the number of projects tackling that objective.
Pole eriti Ÿllatav, et teatud eesmêrki toetavate vêljundite hulk on vastavuses seda eesmêrki saavutada p Ÿ Ÿ d v a t e projektide hulgaga.
The striking «gurehereisthattheobjective`exchangeofgoodpractice'issupportedbymorethan a third of the outputs.
Hêmmastav výib aga tunduda see, et ¶Heade tavade vahetuseƒ eesmêrki toetab enam kui kolmandik vêljunditest.
This shows (a) the importance of that objective for the participants and (b) the real added value of the Daphne programme in transferring knowledge from coun-try to country and from organisation to organisation throughout Europe.
See nêitab: a) selle eesmêrgi olulisust osalejatele ja b) Daphne prog-rammi týelist lisavêêrtust teadmiste Ÿlekandmisel riigist riiki ning organisatsioonist organi-satsiooni Ÿle kogu Euroopa.
On the other hand, the objective `information sources' is more neglected.
Samas on ¶Teabeallikateƒ eesmêrk suhteliselt kýrvalejêetud.
Special attention should therefore be devoted to this aspect in Daphne II.
Seetýttu peaks Daphne II-s sel-lele erilist têhelepanu pûûrama.
Looking at the diagram the other way round, it appears that encouraging people to work together (by `Conference, seminars and workshops') is the output that contributes most to the objectives and promotes all of them.
Teisalt tundub diagrammi vaadates, et inimeste koostûû julgustamine (¶Konverentside, semi-naride ja ýpikodadeƒ kaudu) on see vêljund, mis aitab enim kaasa eesmêrkide saavutamisele ning propageerib neid.
The output `Studies, reports and books' also signi«-cantly contributes to all the objectives.
Ka vêljund ¶Uuringud, aruanded ja t r Ÿ k i s e d ƒ toetab kýiki eesmêrke.
It is also interesting to note that `Training packages and manuals' has an in‹uenceonthreeobjectives, con«rmingtheneedtokeeptraininghighontheagenda.
On huvitav mêrkida, et vêljundil ¶Koolituspaketid ja kêsiraamatudƒ on mýju kolmele eesmêr-gile, kinnitades pêevakajalist suurt vajadust koolituse jêrele.
Moreover, there is no signi«cantdi.erenceinthequalityoftheoutputsfromoneobjectiveto the other.
Programmi mýjud toetavad kýiki eesmêrke, kuigi peamised mýjud toetavad Ÿhte výi enamat eesmêrki.
The main impacts support one or more programme objectives and all programme objectives are supported by impacts.
Seega kindlustavad Daphne programmi týhusust nii vêljundite kui mýjude panused.
The analysis produced a number of recommendations for sustaining that e.ectiveness:
A n a l Ÿ Ÿ s andis arvukalt soovitusi selle týhususe sêilitamiseks:
‡ encourage tangible outputs, such as videos or training modules, that are easy to replicate or to adapt in other areas or with other professionals working with end-bene«ciaries;
‡ julgustada kêegakatsutavaid vêljundeid, nagu video- výi koolituspaketid, mida on kerge paljundada výi kohandada teiste piirkondade výi lýppabisaajatega tûûtavate asjatundjate jaoks;
‡ increase dissemination activities so that project results get more visibility with decision-makers;
‡ suurendada levitustûûd, nii et projektide tulemused oleksid otsusetegijatele nêhtava-mad;
‡ increasingly involve target groups, end-bene«ciariesandkeystakeholdersasearlyasthedesign stage of the project.
‡ suurendada sihtgruppide, lýppabisaajate ja têhtsamate koostûûpartnerite osalust juba projekti planeerimisetapist alates.
The programme e/ciencymeasurestherelationbetweeninputsononehandandoutputsand impacts on the other hand, with a view to assessing the value for money.
Programmi kasutegur mýýdab Ÿhelt poolt sisendite ning teiselt poolt vêljundite ja mýjude suhet, pidades silmas rahalist vêêrtust.
A programme like Daphne is, however, not a production unit, the costs and bene«tsofwhichcan be precisely estimated in monetary terms.
Samas ei saa Daphne-sarnast programmi nimetada t o o t m i s Ÿ k s u s e k s , mille kulusid ja tulusid saaks rahaliselt têpselt hinnata.
Although most of the inputs are known ̌ in terms of funds ̌ it is meaningless to put a monetary value on the outputs or impacts: for example, the value of enabling children and women to protect themselves better and prevent violence cannot be expressed in commercial terms.
Kuigi suurema osa sisendite vêêrtus on rahalises mýttes vêl-jaarvutatav, ei oma see vêljundite výi mýjude puhul mýtet: nêiteks ei saa rahaliselt kirjeldada naiste ja laste výimalusi end paremini vêgivalla eest kaitsta ja selle eest hoiduda.
We can, however, gain indications of the usefulness of the programme, its outputs and impacts.
Siiski on výimalik hinnata programmi ning selle vêljundite ja mýjude kasulikkust.
Another theoretically feasible approach to assessing e/ciencywouldbetobenchmarktheinputs and outputs/impacts of Daphne in relation to a programme with comparable outputs and impacts.
Teine teoreetiline výimalus kasuteguri hindamiseks oleks Daphne sisendite ja vêljundite/mý-jude výrdlemine mýne sarnaste vêljundite ja mýjudega programmiga.
However, to our knowledge and according to the stakeholders interviewed, Daphne is unique, and no comparable programme exists, although there are national initia-tives that cover some of the Daphne areas.
Meie andmetel ning koostûûpartnerite k Ÿ s i t l u s e tulemusena selgub aga, et Daphne on unikaalne ja kuigi riiklikud algatused tegelevad mýne Daphne valdkonnaga, puuduvad výrreldavad programmid.
We have assessed e/ciencybyfollowinga p r a g m a t i c a p p r o a c h , m a k i n g t h e b e s tffu s e o f t h e d i . e r e n t k i n d s o f i nfo r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e a n d f o c u s i n g o n t h e uijt i l i tffy o f t h e p r o g r a m mffe .
Pragmaatilist lêhenemist rakendades oleme olemasoleva teabe abil hinnanud Daphne kasu-tegurit.
T h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e sample of 148 completed projects analysed can be characterised by the fol-lowing basic facts and «gures.
Jêrgnev l Ÿ h i Ÿ l e v a a d e iseloomustab nêidisvalikut a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s i t u d 148 lýpulejýudnud pro-jektist:
‡ The sample represents a total budget of nearly EUR 20 million (up to 2001), i.e. about EUR 133 000 per project and EUR 23 500 per participant.
‡ Nêidis esindab ligi 20 miljoni suurust eelarvet (kuni 2001. aastani), mis teeb 133 000 eurot projekti ning 23 500 eurot osaleja kohta.
‡ The EU funding represents some 75 % of these budgets, i.e. some EUR 17 600 per partici-pant.
‡ ELi fondid rahastasid umbes 75% sellest eelarvest, mis teeb umbes 17 600 eurot osaleja kohta.
On average this means the EU is funding two full-time equivalents (FTE) for each project for one year or 0.35 FTE per participating organisation. This also means that, on average, Daphne supports 0.8 % of the personnel of the participating organisations (13) for one year.
Keskmiselt têhendab see seda, et EL rahastab kahte têisajaekvivalenti iga projekti kohta Ÿhel aastal výi 0,35 têisajaekvivalenti iga osaleva organisatsiooni kohta ning et Daph-ne toetab keskmiselt 0,8% osalevate organisatsioonide13 personalist Ÿhel aastal.
‡ For two thirds of the projects, the remaining 25 % of the budget is covered by internal funds only.
‡ Kaks kolmandikku projektidest rahastavad Ÿlejêênud 25% eelarvest ainult sisefondidest.
Ten per cent of the projects only have access to external funding and one project out of four declares a mix of internal and external funds.
KŸmnel protsendil projektidest on ligipêês ainult vêlisfondidele ning Ÿhte projekti neljast rahastatakse nii sise- kui ka vêlisfondidest.
In particular, these «guresre‹ectthedi/cultaccesstoexternalfunding,eitherbecausethisfundingisscarceorbecausesecur-ing it is not easy.
‡ Keskmiselt on igal projektil viis vêljundit, mis aitavad mêrkimisvêêrselt kaasa kuuele peami-sele programmi eesmêrgile.
The funding is often complemented by extra work from the participating NGOs as well as by volunteers.
98% projektidest jagas laiali Ÿlisuure koguse materjali ja 90% projektidest korraldas Ÿritusi: nêiteks jagasid 27 projekti laiali 228 000 kuulutust ja 297 000 b r o þ Ÿ Ÿ r i ning erinevatel Ÿritustel osales kokku 40 000 inimest.
The volume of this e.ortisobviouslydi/cultto evaluate.
Vêljundid ja nende levita-mine aitasid kaasa sihtgruppide, lýppabisaajate, Ÿldise avalikkuse ja otsusetegijate mýju-tamisele.
) Assuming an average of 42 full-time equivalents in the participating organisations employing less than 1 000 persons.
Arvestades keskmiselt 42 täisajaekvivalenti osalevates kuni 1000 tõõtajaga organisatsioonides.
‡ On average, each project generated «veoutputsthatcontributedsigni«cantlytoachievingthe six main programme objectives.
Projektis osalemine avaldas mýju 97%-le neist: kogemuste, paranenud koostûûvýime ja heade tavade omandamise kaudu.
A very impressive volume of material was dissemi-nated by 98 % of the projects and events were organised by 90 % of them: e.g. 27 projects disseminated 228 000 posters and 297 000 brochures; various events were organised, at-
Daphne programmis osalemine on seega avaldanud kindlat ja positiivset mýju nen-dele organisatsioonidele.
The results of the Daphne experience tended by a total of 40 000 people.
Daphne kogemuse tulemused
Participation in Daphne has therefore had a de«niteand positive e.ectontheseorganisations.
Eelnev týestab, et nendel saavutustel on oluline vêêrtus, eriti silmas pidades komisjonipool-seid piiratud rahalisi výimalusi.
The evaluation did check whether there was any sig-ni«cantrelationshipbetweenthebudgetsize,ontheonehand,andthenatureandfrequen-cy of outputs and impacts on the other, and came to the conclusion that there was none.
Hindamisel kontrolliti ka seda, kas omavahel on sýltuvuses Ÿhelt poolt eelarve suurus ning teiselt poolt vêljundite ja mýjude iseloom ja esinemissagedus, ning jýuti jêreldusele, et selline sýltuvus puudub.
This is, at least partly, due to the fact that most participants in Daphne consider the budget as a tool. They invest voluntary e.ortandattributehighvaluetotheprojectresults.
See tuleneb vêhemalt osaliselt faktist, et enamik Daphne osalistest suhtub eelarvesse kui tûûvahendisse, hinnates kýrgelt projekti tu-lemusi ning tehes nende nimel vabatahtlikke jýupingutusi.
Value for money is also evidenced by the following elements:
Rahaline vêêrtus ilmneb ka jêrgmises:
‡ achievement of a high-level objective: generation of common de«nitionsoracommonapproach to a violence-related issue;
‡ Kýrgetasemelise eesmêrgi saavutamine: vêgivallaga seotud temaatika suhtes Ÿhiste de«nit-sioonide ja lêhenemisviisi loomine.
‡ quality of the outputs: some outputs are still demanded after the project's end or can be easily replicated;
‡ Vêljundite kvaliteet: mýne vêljundi jêrele on nýudlus ka pêrast projekti lýppemist ning tea-tud vêljundeid on výimalik kergelt taastoota.
‡ project sustainability: the project still exists after the end of the contract, or it laid the foun-dations for follow-up projects.
‡ Projekti jêtkusuutlikkus: Projekt eksisteerib ka pêrast lepingu lýppu výi on rajanud aluse jêtkuprojektidele.
Another con«rmationofthevalueformoneycomesfromthe ex-post evaluations, carried out by independent experts on behalf of Daphne, project by project.
Veel Ÿks kinnitus rahalise vêêrtuse kohta saadakse hilisematelt hindamistelt, mida viivad pro-jektide kaupa lêbi Daphne sýltumatud eksperdid.
Out of 76 projects evaluated in this way between 1998 and 2000, 79 % were assessed as providing good or excellent value for money.
76st sel viisil ajavahemikus 1998›2000 hin-natud projektist 79% sai head výi suurepêrast rahalist vêêrtust omava hinnangu.
Last but not least, most stakeholders interviewed ̌ who are not past or present project co-ordinators ̌ consider that Daphne has a dual utility:
Enamiku k Ÿ s i t l e t u d koostûûpartnerite hinnangul, kes ei ole hetkel výi kunagi varem olnud projekti koordinaatorid, seisneb Daphne vêêrtus jêrgmises:
‡ it is unique in addressing the issues of violence against women, young people and children in an integrated way (i.e. considering all the dimensions of violence) and on a European scale;
‡ naiste, noorte ja laste vastu suunatud vêgivalla temaatika integreeritud kêsitlemisel (s.o arvestades kýiki vêgivalla tasandeid) on Daphne Euroopa skaalal unikaalne;
‡ it brings about positive changes in the way violence is perceived and addressed in terms of prevention and protection.
‡ Daphne kutsub esile positiivseid muutusi viisis, kuidas inimesed nêevad ning suhtuvad vêgivalda selle ennetamise ja kaitse seisukohalt.
From the evidence above, we can state that the programme is e / c i e n t , i . e . w i t h l i m i t e d E U s up po r t , signi«cantachievementsandimpactswererealised.Thisassessmentcanbetem-pered by two considerations:
Eespool toodud týendite pýhjal výime vêita, et programm on kasulik, s.o piiratud ELi toetu-sega on saavutatud mêrkimisvêêrset mýju. Seda hinnangut mahendavad kaks kaalutlust:
‡ there have been additional inputs in the form of contributions in kind and the work of vol-unteers that have not been systematically calculated.
‡ arvesse ei ole výetud lisasisendeid eri abipakkumiste ning vabatahtlike tûû nêol.
These inputs have also contributed to outputs and impacts, but are not necessarily sustainable;
Need si-sendid on samuti vêljunditele ja mýjudele kaasa aidanud, kuid ei pruugi olla tingimata jêtkusuutlikud;
‡ among the partners from the social sector, only a small number have sound expertise in resource management, de«nitionofworkplans,etc.,thatfacilitatesoptimaluseofthelimited resources available and prevents exhaustion setting in.
Daphne projektide puhul kuuluvad vêl-junditesse kýik tegevused, mis on partnerite poolt projekti jooksul vêlja arendatud selleks, et toetada Daphne programmi eesmêrke ja kindlustada projekti tulemuste levitamine.
The 699 outputs identi«edaredistributedasfollows:
699 identi«tseeritudvêljunditjaotataksejêrgnevalt:
Information materials, including newsletters
Teabematerjalid, sh teabelehed
Studies, reports and books
Uuringud, aruanded ja t r Ÿ k i s e d
Guidelines, training packages, manuals
Suunised, koolituspaketid, kêsiraamatud
Direct action/«eld interventions, helplines
Otsesed tegevusvaldkondade sekkumised, abitelefonid
Videos, TV/radio spots and other audiovisual products
Videod, TV/raadio ja muud audiovisuaalsed tooted
Conferences, seminars, workshops
Andmebaasid, elektronposti výrgustikud
Outputs achieved within the project (699 outputs)
Projekti raames loodud vêljundid (699 vêljundit)
Presented di.erently,thepercentageofprojectshavinggeneratedoutputsareasfollows:
Teisiti esitatult on vêljundeid loonud projektide protsendid jêrgmised:
Guidelines, training packages, manuals
Juhtnûûrid, koolituspaketid, kêsiraamatud
Conferences, seminars, workshops
Videod, TV/raadio ja muud audiovisuaalsed tooted
Distribution of projects according to the outputs achieved (148 projects, up to three choices per project)
Projektide jaotus vastavalt loodud vêljunditele (148 projekti, kuni kolm valikut projekti kohta)
) MEANS Collection ̋ Evaluation of socioeconomic programmes, European Commission, Regional Policy DG, 1999.
Teisest k Ÿ l j e s t mýjutavad vêljundid ¶Koolituspaketidƒ, ¶Uuringudƒ ja ¶Otsesed sekkumisedƒ otseselt sihtgruppe ja lýppabisaajaid.
‡ `changed behaviour of target groups regarding prevention of violence' (53 % of these projects compared with 40 % for the entire sample);‡ `improved means for end-bene«ciariestotackletheirsituation'(70%oftheseprojectscompared with 55 % for the entire sample).
‡ ¶Lýppabisaajate paranenud výimalused oma olukorraga toimetulemiseksƒ (70% nendest projektidest výrreldes 55%ga projektide koguhulgast).
The above two points, con«rmedbytheopinionofsomestakeholders,tendtoshowthatinformation campaigns are useful for actually preventing violence.
âlaltoodud kaks punkti, mida kinnitavad mýnede koostûûpartnerite arvamused, nêitavad, et teabekampaaniad on vêgivalla tegelikuks êrahoidmiseks kasulikud.
However, in order to im-prove the situation of the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s , d i r e c t a d v o c a c y w i t h a n d s up po r t t offe n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s a r e m o r e i m po r t a n t t h a n g e n e r a l i nfo r m a t i o n a n d a w a r e n e s s - r a i s i n g .
Siiski on lýppabisaajate endi olukorra parandamiseks nende otsene toetamine têhtsam kui Ÿldine teadlikkuse týst-mine.
Of the completed projects, 97 % implemented dissemination activities along the following categories:
97% lýpetatud projektidest rakendasid levitusalaseid tegevusi jêrgmiste kategooriatena:
(N = 144 projects with dissemination)
(N = 144 levitamist kasutanud projekti)
38 % i"Distribution of materiali"Organisation of events i"Distribution of materials and organisation of events i"Distribution of materials and close contacts i"Distribution of materials, organisa-tion of events and close contacts
3 8 % i Materjalide levitaminei ârituste korraldamine i Materjalide levitamine ja Ÿrituste korraldamine i Materjalide levitamine ja head kontaktid i Materjalide levitamine, Ÿrituste korraldamine ja head kontaktid
By considering each way separately, it appears that 98 % of the projects have distributed materials, 90 % have organised events and 42 % have had close contacts.
Iga aspekti eraldi vaadeldes ilmneb, et 98% projektidest on levitanud materjale, 90% on kor-raldanud Ÿritusi ja 42%-l on olnud lêhikontakt.
Manuals/guidelines/training packs
Kêsiraamatud/juhtnûûrid/ koolitusmaterjalid
A r t i c l e s / a b s t r a c t s
Tutvustavad artiklid
Distribution of projects according to their production of materials for dissemination (144 projects)
Projektide jaotus levitamismaterjalide koostamise jêrgi (144 projekti)
Considering that most of the projects had a duration of one year, we can evidently state that partners have produced a lot of material over a short period, as indicated below:
Arvestades enamiku projektide ajalist piiratust (Ÿheaastased), výime julgelt vêita, et koostûû-partnerid on l Ÿ h i k e s e aja jooksul vêlja andnud suure hulga materjale:
227 966 posters by 27 projects 13 556 newsletters by 9 projects 297 160 brochures by 27 projects 77 272 reports by 46 projects 64 600 manuals by 7 projects 27 700 books by 19 projects 370 t-shirts by 2 projects 731 456 lea‹etsby36projects 21 553 articles by 14 projects 2 000 directories by 2 projects 1 770 videos by 5 projects 5 000 stickers by 2 projects 6 000 postcards by 4 projects 16 152 CD-ROMs by 12 projects 2 000 business cards by 2 projects 2 000 colour cartoons by 1 project 500 protocols by 1 project 200 pins by 1 project.
227 966 plakatit 27 projektilt 13 556 teabelehte 9 projektilt 297 160 b r o þ Ÿ Ÿ r i 27 projektilt 77 272 aruannet 46 projektilt 64 600 kêsiraamatut 7 projektilt 27 700 raamatut 19 projektilt 370 T-sêrki 2 projektilt 731 456 lendlehte 36 projektilt 21 553 artiklit 14 projektilt 2000 kataloogi 2 projektilt 1770 videot 5 projektilt 5000 kleepsu 2 projektilt 6000 postkaarti 4 projektilt 16 152 CD-ROMi 12 projektilt 2000 visiitkaarti 2 projektilt 2000 vêrvilist koomiksit 1 projektilt 500 protokolli 1 projektilt 200 nûûpnýela 1 projektilt
From the survey, the following «gureshavebeenextractedonthenumbersofeventsorgan-ised and their attendees:
Uurimusest on toodud jêrgmised arvud korraldatud Ÿrituste ja nendel osalejate kohta:
71 meetings organised for 19 projects, totalling 880 attendees 51 participations in conferences, for 6 projects, totalling 3 620 attendees 94 conferences organised for 62 projects, totalling 16 793 attendees 389 seminars organised for 64 projects, totalling 11 334 attendees245 workshops organised for 36 projects, totalling 4 356 attendees 56 project presentations organised for 6 projects, totalling 3 160 attendees 2 press conferences organised for 1 project, totalling 40 attendees 70 implementation meetings organised for 1 project and involving 546 persons.
‡ Selliste Ÿrituste korraldamiseks vajalikud ressursid on mahukad, výrreldes teiste levitamis-tegevustega, nêiteks v e e b i l e h e k Ÿ l j e kaudu.
Conferences, seminars and workshops are strong instruments for networking.
‡ Levitamine puudutab peamiselt kohaletulnud inimesi.