natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If you consider that your EU rights have not been upheld and have exhausted the above means of redress, you can also lodge your complaint with the European Commission at http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/your_rights/your_rights_forms_en.htm
Kui leiate, et teie ELi kodaniku õigused ei ole tagatud ning te olete juba kasutanud eespool nimetatud edasikaebamisvõimalusi, võite esitada oma kaebuse Euroopa Komisjonile aadressil http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/your_rights/your_rights_forms_et.htm
You are also entitled to lodge a petition with the European Parliament.
Lisaks on teil õigus esitada petitsioon Euroopa Parlamendile.
To lodge a petition, please go to www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=49 & language=EN
Petitsiooni saate esitada aadressil http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=49 & language=ET
This brochure is the result of a number of recent initiatives, including the « n a l e v a l u a t i o nffo f t h e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe c a r r i e d out between May and October 2003.
Kêesolev b r o þ Ÿ Ÿ r on erinevate hiljuti tehtud tûûde tulemus, mille hulgas on ka 2003. aasta maist oktoobrini lêbiviidud Daphne programmi lýpphinnang.
This brochure is also largely indebted to Dr June Kane for her extensive detailed knowledge gained during monitoring visits to many Daphne projects.
B r o þ Ÿ Ÿ r i koostajad on tênu výlgu dr June Kane'ile tema ulatuslike Ÿksikasjalike teadmiste eest, mis saadi k o n t r o l l k Ÿ l a s t u s t e ajal.
Ç European Communities, 2005 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
Ç Euroopa Ÿhendused, 2005Allikale viitamisel on reprodutseerimine lubatud.
Aims and priorities
Eesmêrgid ja prioriteedid
So what is violence anyway?
Mida kujutab endast vêgivald?
The results of the Daphne experience
Daphne kogemuse tulemused
Conclusion
Jêreldused
Information and contacts
Informatsioon ja kontaktid
Raison d'ðtre and the April 1997 hearing
Pýhjendus ja aprillis 1997 toimunud êrakuulamine
On 11 April 1997, representatives of 30 non-governmental organisations (NGOs), Members of the European Parliament, European Commission sta.members,law-enforcementrepresent-atives and individuals with expertise in the area of child protection gathered in Brussels for a hearing on the subjects of tra/ckingandsexualexploitationofchildren.
11. aprillil 1997 kogunesid B r Ÿ s s e l i s s e lastekaubanduse ja seksuaalse ekspluateerimise alasele êrakuulamisele 30 valitsusvêlise organisatsiooni esindajad, Euroopa Parlamendi liikmed, Eu-roopa Komisjoni tûûtajad, ýiguskaitsespetsialistid ning lastekaitse alal pêdevad eraisikud.
The hearing was one element of a broad-ranging response from the Commission to the events of 1996 that had shaken Europe and galvanised public and political opinion.
Êrakuulamine oli Ÿheks osaks komisjoni laia kýlapinnaga vastusest 1996. aasta s Ÿ n d m u s - t e l e , mis vapustasid Euroopat ning mýjutasid avalikku ja poliitilist arvamust.
The discovery of the bodies of a number of missing girls in premises in Belgium in late summer 1996 raised questions about what Europe could do to protect children from those who wished to abuse or exploit them for p r o « t .
Paljude Bel-gias kadunud t Ÿ t a r l a s t e laipade leidmine 1996. aasta suve lýpul týstatas k Ÿ s i m u s e , mida saab Euroopa teha laste kaitseks nende vêêrkohtlemise výi kasu saamise eesmêrgil eksplua-teerimise vastu.
T h e « r s t W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a t i o nffo f C h i l d r e n , held in Stockholm in August that same year, provided more information on such issues and, in a Declaration and Agenda for Action, suggested some possible actions that could be taken.
Esimene laste seksuaalse ekspluateerimise vastane maailmakongress, mis toimus Stockholmis sama aasta augustis, andis selliste k Ÿ s i m u s t e suhtes enam informat-siooni ning vastuvýetud deklaratsioon ja tegevuskava pakkusid vêlja výimalikke meet-meid, mida tuleks výtta.
Commissioner with special responsibility for coordinating the Commission's activities against tra/ckingandsexualexploitationofchildren,declaredthat:
Maailmakongressi jêrel kinnitas komisjoni lastekaubanduse ja seksuaalse ekspluateerimise k Ÿ s i m u s i kureeriv volinik Anita Gradin komisjoni mêrgukirjas1 jêrgmist:
`the Commission endorses the analysis made in Stockholm concerning the existence of mul-tiple, in many respects interlinked, factors of an economic, social, cultural and political nature which conspire to create an environment leading to the sexual exploitation of chil-dren'.
¶Komisjon kiidab heaks Stockholmis tehtud a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s i , mille alusel týdetakse, et eksisteerivad paljud omavahel seotud majandusliku, sotsiaalse, kultuurilise ja poliitilise iseloomuga faktorid, mille koostoime loob laste seksuaalset ekspluateerimist soodustava keskkonna.ƒ
In the face of these challenges, Mrs Gradin said, the Commission also:
Gradin Ÿtles, et nende vêljakutsete valguses komisjon:
The Commissioner presented a number of new measures in f u l « l mffe n t o f t h e S t o c k h o l m A g e n - d a for Action, including a communication on tra/ckinginwomenandgirlsforthepurpose
¶toetab têielikult Stockholmi deklaratsiooni ja kutsub Ÿles výtma kooskýlastatud meetmeid riigi, piirkondlikul ja rahvusvahelisel tasandil, mille eelduseks on kýigi asjakohaste partnerite (riigiasutused, rahvusvahelised agentuurid, valitsusvêlised organisatsioonid ning eraýiguslikud Ÿhingud, k o d a n i k u Ÿ h i s k o n n a organisatsioonid ja turismitûûstus) mobiliseerimine ja vajaliku rahastamise tagamine.
) and draft rec- ommendations to Member States; a Green Paper on new audiovisual services such as the
Seetýttu tuleb Euroopa Liidul lêbi oma institutsioonide kanda vastutust selle probleemi vastu výitlemise eest oma territooriumil„ƒ
European Union to intensifying the #ghtagainst the sexual abuse and exploitation of children (SG/T/TLM/md D(96)II), aide-memoire presented by Commissioner Gradin (Brussels, 25 September 1996).
2 matu uute audiovisuaalsete teenuste jaoks, nagu internet, ning kahjuliku ja ebaseadusliku
The April 1997 hearing was therefore called to seek the views of grassroots organisations on how European-level cooperation and exchange could function and where the focus of e.orts
Märgukiri, mille esitas volinik Gradin (Brüssel, 25. september 1996).KOM(96) 567 (l÷plik), 20.11.1996.KOM(96) 547 (l÷plik), 20.11.1996.KOM(96) 487 (l÷plik), 16.10.1996.Praegune laste seksuaalse ekspluateerimise vastase maailmakongressi kom-munikatsioonikoordi-naator ja eestk÷neleja dr June Kane oli 1997. a UNICEFi konsultant.
( 5 should be placed. A moderator was provided by the Unicef Regional O / c e f o r E u r op e (5), and the conclusions of the hearing were to feed into a new initiative to be launched by the Com-mission s p e c i « c a l l y t op r o m o t e N G O a c t i o n .
Osalejad olid vêga selgesýnalised selle suhtes, mida nende arvates tuleks teha:
The participants were clear about what they felt was needed:
‡ organiseeritud lobitûû ja teadvustamise abil laste vêêrkohtlemise ja seksuaalse eksplua-teerimisega seotud k Ÿ s i m u s t e hoidmine poliitilisel esiplaanil;
‡ keeping the issues of abuse and sexual exploitation of children high on the political agenda through organised lobbying and awareness-raising;
‡ týhusamad sidustatud ýigusraamistikud riigi tasandil ja ýigusreformid Ÿhtluse saavutami-seks Euroopa tasandil;
‡ improved coherent legislative frameworks at national level and legal reforms to move to-wards harmonisation at European level;
‡ valitsusvêliste organisatsioonide koostûû ja kooskýlastamine ning parem valdkondadeva-heline koostûû, mis toob kaasa têiuslikuma info- ja heade tavade vahetuse;
‡ mapping of problems and resources to avoid duplication and produce added value;
‡ probleemide ja ressursside kaardistamine dubleerimise vêltimiseks ja lisavêêrtuse andmi-seks;
‡ the involvement of children in all prevention and rehabilitation programmes, acknowledg-ing that they are not passive victims but important resources with needs that they should de«nethemselves (6).
‡ laste kaasahaaramine kýigisse ennetus- ja rehabilitatsiooniprogrammidesse, teadvustades, et nad ei ole passiivsed ohvrid, vaid têhtsad isikud, kellel on vajadused, mida nad ise peak- sid mêêratlema.6
Launch of the Daphne initiative, May 1997
Daphne algatuse kêivitamine mais 1997
These concerns were integrated into the design of the Daphne initiative (7), announced just after the hearing and which was launched in May 1997.
Need k Ÿ s i m u s e d integreeriti Daphne algatuse kavasse,7 mis kuulutati vêlja ja kêivitati vahetult pêrast êrakuulamist 1997. aasta mais.
Logically attached to the Commission's services in charge of justice and home a.airsandfundamentalrights,thisone-yearfundingline of ECU 3 million would be used to support modest projects (up to ECU 100 000 in the «rstyear) that would bring together NGOs from at least two Member States to cooperate in re-search, data collection and analysis, good practice identi«cationandsharing,training,ex-change and networking, awareness-raising and information campaigns, direct action to sup-port victims of violence, and the production of tools for policy and practice, such as guidelines and protocols.
Loogiliselt kuulub see k Ÿ s i m u s t e r i n g komisjoni justiits- ja s i s e k Ÿ s i m u s t e ning pýhiýiguste valdkonda ning Ÿheaastane 3 miljoni e k Ÿ Ÿ suurune raha-line abi pidi toetama tagasihoidlikumaid projekte (kuni 100 000 e k Ÿ Ÿ d esimese aasta jooksul), mis kêivitaks vêhemalt kahe liikmesriigi valitsusvêliste organisatsioonide koostûû sellistel ala-del nagu teadustûû, andmekogumine ja a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s , hea tava kindlaksmêêramine ja vahetus, vêljaýpe, kogemuste vahetus ja výrgustiku loomine, teadvustamine ja teabekampaaniad, otsene tegevus vêgivallaohvrite toetuseks, selliste poliitika- ja praktikavahendite loomine nagu suunised ja protokollid.
The Daphne initiative was open to all Member States, and NGOs submitting projects were additionally encouraged to «ndpartnersamongresearchinstitutes,law-en-forcement bodies, public authorities, schools and training establishments, the media and other sectors whose cooperation might be vital in combating violence.
Daphne algatus oli avatud kýigile liikmesriikidele ning projekte esitavatel valitsusvêlistel organisatsioonidel soovitati lisaks leida partnereid teadusasutustest, ýiguskaitseasutustest, riigiasutustest, koolidest ja ýppeasutustest, meediast ja muudest sek-toritest, millega koostûû oleks vêgivalla vastu výitlemisel oluline.
In early anticipation of the planned European Campaign against Violence against Women in 1999, and recognising the links between violence against women and violence against chil-dren and young people, the Daphne initiative aimed to promote actions to combat not only violence against children but also against young people and women (8).
Enne planeeritud Euroopa kampaaniat naistevastase vêgivalla vastu 1999. aastal ning mýistes naiste-, laste- ja noortevastase vêgivalla seotust, seati Daphne algatuse eesmêrgiks hoogustada tegevusi, mis ei oleks suunatud Ÿksnes laste-, vaid ka noorte- ja naistevastase vêgivalla vastu.8
The one-year Daphne initiative of 1997 struck a chord with NGOs, and response to the two calls for proposals (the « r s t i n M a y a n d t h e s e cffo n d i n S e p t e m b e r ) w a s h i g h .
1997. aasta Ÿheaastane Daphne algatus leidis Ÿhise keele valitsusvêliste organisatsioonidega ning kaks projektikonkurssi (esimene oli mais ja teine septembris) leidsid elavat vastukaja.
A s a r e s u l t , f u n d - i n g for the initiative was renewed in 1998 and increased to ECU 5 million.
Selle tulemusena korrati 1998. aastal algatuse rahastamist, mille kogusummat suurendati 5 miljoni e k Ÿ Ÿ n i .
When the budget line was renewed for a third time in 1999, with a modest increase in project funding to a maximum of EUR 125 000, it was with a view to continuing action while a legal base was iden-ti«edandprocesseswerecompletedforamultiannualprogrammetobelaunchedin2000.
Kolmanda eelarve alusel 1999. aastal, kui projektide rahastamist suurendati tagasihoidlikult kuni 125 000 euroni, oli eesmêrgiks olukorras, kus ýiguslik alus oli mêêratletud ja protsess lýpetati, jêtkata tegevust mitmeaastase programmi raames, mida kavatseti kêi-vitada 2000. aastal.
In fact, in the tradition of many Commission programmes that have names sourced from the classics, Daphne makes reference to the young woman of Greek mythology who was chased by the god Apollo, who wished to ravage her.
Tegelikult järgiti traditsiooni kasutada komisjoni programmidel klassikalisi nimetusi, Daphne oli Kreeka mütoloogias noor naine, keda ihaldas ja jälitas jumal Apollo, soovides teda hävitada.
The Daphne programme 2000›03 continued the work of the initiative, with funding of EUR 20 million over four years.
Daphne programm 2000›03 jêtkas algatuse tûûd, rahastades seda enam kui nelja aasta jook-sul 20 miljoni euroga.
Learning from the lessons drawn each year from the Daphne initia-tive, the programme was extended to EFTA/EEA and central and east European countries, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey; local authorities were able to submit proposals; and associate part-
Daphne algatuse kêigus igal aastal saadud ýppetundide alusel laien-dati programmi EFTA/EMP ning Kesk- ja Ida-Euroopa riikidele, KŸprosele, Maltale ja TŸrgile; ettepanekuid výisid esitada ka kohalikud omavalitsused ja assotsieerunud partneritel ELi kan-didaatriikidest lubati ka osaleda (projektide rahastamine nimetatud maades ei olnud siiski veel výimalik). Daphne programmi alusel oli výimalik rahastada projekte kestusega Ÿks, kaks výi kolm aastat.
Submissions received and projects funded, 1997›2003
Saadud taotluste arv ja rahastatud projektid aastatel 1997›2003
Submissions received4282703544152752662582 266
Saadud taotlused4282703544152752662582266
Projects funded4649544735 (*)3933303
Rahastatud projektid4649544735*3933303
(*) Note that, since the Daphne programme 2000›03 also funded multiannual projects from 2000, some projects continued in subsequent years and thus reduced the budget available for new projects.
* Pange têhele, et kuna Daphne programmist 2000›03 rahastati mitmeaastaseid projekte alates aastast 2000, jêtkusid mýned projektid jêrgmistel aastatel, mis omakorda vêhendas eelarvet uute projektide kêivitamiseks.
This explains why fewer projects «gureintheannualselectionroundfrom2001onwards.
See seletab, miks alates 2001. aastast on uute projektide arv vêiksem.
The future: the Daphne II programme 2004›08
Tulevik: Daphne II programm 2004›08
In February 2003, the European Commission adopted a proposal establishing a second phase of the Daphne programme for the period 2004›08.
2003. aasta veebruaris výttis Euroopa Komisjon vastu eelnýu Daphne programmi teise etapi loomise kohta aastateks 2004›08.
A decision on Daphne II was approved by the Council on 30 March 2004. The new programme was launched in May 2004.
Otsuse Daphne II suhtes kiitis nýukogu heaks 30. mêrtsil 2004. Uus programm kêivitati 2004. aasta mais.
The Commis-sion has not substantially changed the objectives, the mechanisms or the targets of the Daphne programme, but it has proposed a number of improvements with a view to enhanc-ing the impact of the programme.
Komisjon ei ole oluliselt muutnud Daphne programmi eesmêrke, mehhanismi ega sihte, kuid on teinud rea parandusettepanekuid, mil-le eesmêrgiks on programmi mýju suurendamine.
(a) An important improvement is the increase of the budget: EUR 50 million will be available for the period 2004›08, compared with EUR 20 million of the «rstprogramme.Anincreasein the budget is necessary in order to face both the consequences of enlargement to cen-tral and east European countries and the large demand from organisations in order to at least reduce frustration that sometimes appears among the applicants.
a) Oluliseks muutuseks on eelarve suurenemine: výrreldes 20 miljoni euroga esimese prog-rammi puhul eraldatakse 2004.›08. aasta eelarveks umbes 50 miljonit eurot. Eelarve suu-rendamine on oluline nii ELi laienemise týttu Kesk- ja Ida-Euroopa riikidesse kui ka organi-satsioonidepoolse suure nýudluse týttu, et vêhemalt vêhendada taotlejate pettumust, mida mýnikord ilmneb.
Daphne II is pro-posed for a period of « v e y e a r s . T h i s p r o v i d e s a n a n n u a l bu d g e t o f E U R 1 0 m i l l i o n i n s t e a d o f EUR 5 million.
Daphne II kavandatav kestus on 5 aastat.
(b) The second improvement is the list of activities that can be supported.
b) Teiseks têiustuseks on toetatavate meetmete loetelu.
The Daphne II pro-gramme is more exhaustive, compared with Daphne I, about the types of activity, the ar-eas of action, which can be funded.
Daphne II programm on výrreldes Daphne I-ga têielikum rahastatavate meetmete ja tegevusvaldkondade osas.
It is foreseen that the programme comprise the fol-lowing types of activities:
Nêhakse ette, et programm toetab jêrgmisi meetmeid:
‡ identi«cationandexchangesofgoodpracticeandworkexperiencewithaviewinparticular to implementing preventive measures and assistance to victims;
‡ hea tava ning tûûkogemuse mêêratlemine ja vahetus, pidades silmas eriti ennetusmeet-mete rakendamist ja ohvrite abistamist;
‡ mapping surveys, studies and research;
‡ k a a r d i s t u s Ÿ l e v a a t e d , uuringud ja teadustûû;
‡ creation of sustainable multidisciplinary networks; more broadly de#nedtore$ectprevailingnational attitudes and legislation, and generally ranges from around 16 to 25 years of age.
‡ ohvrite ja r i s k i r Ÿ h m a kuuluvate inimeste (sh kodust vêgivalda pealt nêgevad lapsed ja noored) kohtlemisprogrammide ja toetuse vêljatûûtamine ning rakendamine; kuid vastav iga jääb üldiselt 16 ja 25 eluaasta vahele.
Clearly this also overlaps into `adulthood' as generally de#ned.葵isre$ectsthe general confusion about when childhood ends and adulthood begins, and the fact that in most programming worldwide people moving from one into the other ̋ adolescents or young people ̋ are o挨enoverlookedbecause they are too d i L c u l t t o c a t e g o r i s e . 葵 e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe has taken a pragmatic approach to this and, in not imposing de#nitions,has le挨ittotheindividual projects to #nda`comfortableplace' between national needs and international frameworks.
Kahtlemata kattub see m÷iste ‡täisealisusƒ üldise de#nitsiooniga.Siinonka tegemist üldise segadusega, millal täpselt lapsep÷lv l÷peb ja täisealisus algab, ning asjaoluga, et kuna ülemaailmselt on raske määratleda inimese siirdumist ühest kategooriast teise, jäetaksegi terminid ‡noorukiigaƒ v÷i ‡nooredƒ täpsemalt lahti seletamata. Daphne programm on selles suhtes valinud pragmaatilise lähenemise ja s÷ltumata de#nitsioonistlubabigal üksikul projektil leida ‡sobiva kohaƒ riiklike vajaduste ja rahvusvaheliste raamistike vahel.
‡ training and design of educational packages;
‡ kurjategijate kohtlemisprogrammide vêljatûûtamine ja rakendamine, kindlustades samal ajal ohvrite ning laste ohutuse;
‡ development and implementation of awareness-raising activities targeted to speci«caudi-ences, design of materials to supplement those already available, or adaptation and use of existing materials in other geographical areas or for other target groups;
‡ konkreetsetele gruppidele mýeldud, teadlikkust týstvate Ÿrituste ettevalmistamine ja lêbiviimine, saadaval olevate materjalide têiendamine výi olemasolevate materjalide kohandamine ja kasutamine teistes geograa«listespiirkondadesvýiteistessihtgruppi-des;
‡ dissemination of the results obtained under the Daphne I and II programmes including their adaptation, transfer and use by other bene«ciariesorinothergeographicalareas;
‡ Daphne I ja II programmide raames saadud tulemuste levitamine, sh nende tulemuste kohandamine, kasutamine ja edastamine teistele abisaajatele výi teistesse geograa«lis-tesse piirkondadesse;
‡ assessment and development of activities contributing to positive treatment for people vulnerable to violence, that is to an approach which encourages respect for them and pro-motes their well-being and self-ful«lment.
‡ vêgivalla ees kaitsetute inimeste heale kohtlemisele kaasa aitavate tegevuste hindamine ja vêljatûûtamine, pidades silmas sellist lêhenemisviisi, mis aitab suurendada austust nende suhtes ja edendab nende heaolu ning eneseteostust.
(c) The Commission has also set aside around 15 % of the budget of the programme in order to enable the Commission to improve the programme's impact and to play a more proac-tive rule with a view to the dissemination of good practices.
c) Komisjon on eraldanud 15% programmi eelarvest selleks, et komisjon saaks programmi mýju suurendada ja mêngida aktiivsemat rolli heade tavade levitamisel.
Activities to be covered are threefold.
Sellised tegevused jagunevad kolmeks.
A «rstaxisistodevelopindicatorsonviolence,sothatthequanti«edimpactofpolicies and projects can be measured.
Kýigepealt vêgivallaindikaatorite vêljatûûtamine nii, et saaks mýýta poliitikate ja projektide kvantitatiivset mýju.
In complement to these indicators, it will seek to set up a procedure for regular and sustainable data collection, preferably with the assist-ance of Eurostat, in order to be able to quantify violence in the Union more accurately.
Lisaks nendele indikaatoritele p Ÿ Ÿ t a k s e eelis-tatavalt EUROSTATi abiga sêtestada korralise ja jêtkusuutliku andmekogumise protseduur, et oleks têpsemalt výimalik mêêratleda vêgivalla ulatust liidus.
A second axis will be to extract and deduce policy issues, wherever possible, from the work achieved by funded projects, with the aim of suggesting common policies on violence at Community level and reinforcing judicial practice.
Teiseks tegevusteljeks on výimaluse korral eraldada ja tuletada poliitikavaldkonna teemad rahastatud projektide saavutatud tulemuste alusel, mille eesmêrk on Ÿhise vêgivallapoliitika vêljapakkumine Ÿhenduse tasandil ja kohtute tûû týhustamine.
Finally, the third axis would be to dis-seminate, on a Europe-wide scale, good practices stemming from funded projects.
Kolmandaks tegevusteljeks on rahastatud projektidest tuleneva hea tava levitamine Ÿle Euroopa.
The Daphne initiative in 1997, 1998 and 1999
Daphne algatus aastatel 1997, 1998 ja 1999
In the « r s tffy e a r o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e ( 1 9 9 7 ) , t h e c a l l f o r p r o po s a l s w a s f a i r l y s p e c i « cffo n priority actions to be taken:
Daphne algatuse esimesel aastal (1997) hýlmas projektikonkurss jêrgmisi spetsii«lisipriori-teetseid tegevusi:
‡ setting up networks or reinforcement of networks at European level to promote and coor-dinate information and actions on measures aimed at protecting, and preventing violence towards children, young people and women, including the promotion of cooperation be-tween NGOs and voluntary organisations and authorities involved in these areas;
‡ výrgustike loomine výi nende tugevdamine Euroopa tasandil, arendamaks ja kooskýlas-tamaks teavet ja tegevusi, mis on suunatud laste, noorte ja naiste kaitseks vêgivalla eest ning selle ennetamiseks, sealhulgas seotud valitsusvêliste ja vabatahtlike organisatsiooni-de ning riigiasutuste koostûû edendamine;
‡ promotion of the establishment of a `child helpline' on a similar basis in every Member State;
‡ igas liikmesriigis samadel alustel tegutsevate laste usaldustelefonide loomise edendamine;
‡ special measures at European level for the protection of children, young people and wom-en, with primary consideration being given to them in all actions concerning them, their rights being enjoyed without discrimination of any kind;
‡ laste, noorte ja naiste kaitseks výetavad erimeetmed Euroopa tasandil, diskrimineerimata mingil moel nende ýigusi;
‡ prevention and protection of children, young people and women from all kinds of violence and commercial sexual exploitation, tra/ckingandotherabuse;
‡ laste, noorte ja naiste kaitse igasuguse vêgivalla ja seksuaalse ekspluateerimise, inimkau-banduse ning muu vêêrkohtlemise eest ning selle ennetamine;
‡ actions aimed at tackling international paedophile rings;
‡ tegevused, mille eesmêrk on rahvusvaheliste pedo«iliagruppidetakistamine;