natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This does not prejudice the Commission's assessment on the merits, namely its analysis of whether the measure adopted may form a barrier to trade in any way.
Lisaks sellele on ¶Unileveriƒ kohtuotsuses sêtestatud, et eraisikuid ei saa sundida têitma ka selliseid meetmeid, millest on teavitatud, kuid mis on hiljem vastu výetud direktiivi 98/34/Eâ artikliga 9 ette nêhtud ooteajal.
If the Member States adopt the same set of rules as required by a Community Directive, trade barriers and di.erencesbetweennational laws are removed at the same time, and the procedure laid down by Directive 98/34/EC is no longer needed.
Alalise komitee 8. juuni 1995. aasta dokumendi 94/94 lýplik versioon ja alalise komitee dokument S-42/98 (def).Kýnealuste otsuste viited on esitatud valitud kirjanduse V punktis.Kohtuasi C-194/94: CIA Security, EKL 1996, I-2201 ja kohtuasi C-226/97: Lemmens EKL 1998, I-3711.Kohtuasi C-443/98: Unilever, EKL 2000, I-7535.
within this exception; if these are measures adopted to con-form with an international agreement to which not all the Member States are party, they must be noti«ed.
› mêêratleks valdkonnad, kus Ÿhtlustamine tundub vajalik, ja niisuguse olukorra tekkimisel výtaks ette asjakohase Ÿhtlusta-mise selles sektoris.
This Article lays down in paragraph 10 that `The harmonisation measures (....) shall, in appropriate cases, include a safeguard clause author-ising the Member States to take, for one or more of the non-eco-nomic reasons referred to in Article 30, provisional measures sub-ject to a Community control procedure'.
Liikmesriikide nimetatud esindajatest luuakse alaline komitee, kes výib paluda ekspertide výi nýustajate abi, komitee esimees on ko-misjoni esindaja.
These non-economic reasons can relate to public morality, public order or public security; the protection of the health and life of humans, animals or plants, the protection of national treasures possessing artistic or archaeological value or the pro-tection of industrial and commercial property.
b) teabe esitamise Ÿhtsete reeglite, samuti standardimisprog-rammide esitamisplaani ja kriteeriumide kehtestamisel (artikli 2 lýige 2);
This Article provides that `where a Member State adopts or de-cides to adopt, recommend or agree with producers and distribu-tors, whether on a compulsory or voluntary basis, measures or ac-
Komitee tuleb kokku vêhemalt kaks korda aastas koos I ja II lisas nimetatud standardiorganisatsioonide esindajatega.
RAPEX, whose legal basis is Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety, serves as a single rapid alert system for dangerous consumer products.
Komitee tuleb kokku erakorralises koosseisus, kui on vaja kêsitle-da i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuseid kêsitlevaid k Ÿ s i m u s i .
cerning a subject covered by current or imminent Community work, do not apply to voluntary agreements.
d) kui kontrollib kêesoleva direktiiviga ettenêhtud s Ÿ s t e e m i toi-mimist; e) lýike 3 esimeses taandes viidatud standardiorganisatsioonide-le esitatud nýuete Ÿle.
Article 9 shall not apply to the laws, regulations and administra-tive provisions of the Member States prohibiting manufacture in-sofar as they do not impede the free movement of products.
Komisjon esitab komiteele aruande kêesolevas direktiivis ette-nêhtud korra rakendamise ja kohaldamise kohta ning ettepane-kud olemasolevate výi prognoositavate kaubandustýkete kýrval-damiseks.
Article 9 (3) to (6) shall not apply to the voluntary agreements referred to in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 11 of Article 1.
Komitee avaldab arvamust lýikes 2 nimetatud teavitamise ja ettepanekute kohta ning výib sellega seoses teha eelkýige ettepa-neku, et komisjon:
Article 9 shall not apply to the technical speci«cationsorotherrequirements or the rules on services referred to in the third indent of the second subparagraph of point 11 of Article 1.
Kêesoleva direktiivi rakendamisega seotud k Ÿ s i m u s e d výib ko-miteele kêsitlemiseks esitada selle eesistuja výi liikmesriigi algatu-sel.
In the second case, it was considered inopportune to require postponement of adoption of measures linked to the « s c a l s y s t e m o ft h e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s .
Komitee menetlused ja talle esitatav teave on kon«dentsiaal-sed.
When the Member State concerned does not comply, the pro-cedure leads to a judgment of failure to fu l « l o b l i g a t i o n s b y t h e C o u r t of Justice.
› kaubandustýkete ohu vêltimiseks tagaks vajaduse korral, et asjaomased liikmesriigid otsustaksid esialgu omavahel vajali-ke meetmete Ÿle,
As far as draft regulations concerning «scalor«nancialmeas-ures are concerned, the absence of the standstill obligation for the notifying Member State does not exclude the Commission or another Member State from reacting to these drafts by means of comments or detailed opinions (See Article 8 (1)).
Komitee ja siseriiklikud asutused výivad eksperdiarvamuse saami-seks siiski nýu pidada f Ÿ Ÿ s i l i s t e výi juriidiliste isikutega, sealhulgas erasektorisse kuuluvatega, kui nad kasutavad vajalikke ettevaa-tusabinýusid.
Under the terms of paragraph (3), the blockage and the stand-still obligations applicable to draft national regulations con-
› výtaks kýik asjakohased meetmed,
them.Furthermore, the Unilever judgment laid down that even a measure which is noti«edbutwhichissubsequentlyadopted during the standstill period laid down in Article 9 of Directive 98/34/EC, cannot be enforced against individuals.
erandlikult kon«dentsiaalsena.Selliseljuhulpeabkomiteera-kendama vajalikke ettevaatusabinýusid kaitsmaks liikmesriiki-de ýigustatud ja nýuetekohaselt pýhjendatud huve.
› identify the areas where harmonisation appears necessary, and, should the case arise, undertake appropriate harmonisa-tion in a given sector.
Lisaks sellele peab teatavates k Ÿ s i m u s t e s komiteega konsul-teerima komisjon, sealhulgas direktiiviga sêtestatud teabeva-hetuseks praktikas kasutatava s Ÿ s t e e m i valimises.
A Standing Committee shall be set up consisting of representa-tives appointed by the Member States who may call on the assist-ance of experts or advisers; its chairman shall be a representative of the Commission.
Sellise dialoogi ergutamine on kooskýlas direktiivi 98/34/Eâ eesmêrgiga, milleks on týkete kýrvaldami-ne nende allika juures, eelistades sunnivahendite kasutamise vajadusele ennetavaid tegevusi.
The Committee shall draw up its own rules of procedure.
Selline abi výib olla praktikas hêdavajalik, sest liikmesriigi riigiasutu-sed ei oma alati vajalikku teadmist ja ressursse.
b) when drawing up the rules for the consolidated presentation of information and the plan and criteria for the presentation of standards programmes (Article 2 (2));
Komisjon esitab komiteele iga kahe aasta jêrel direktiivi kohal-damise tulemusi kêsitleva aruande, mille ta saadab Euroopa Parlamendile, nýukogule ja Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalko-miteele (vt artiklit 11).
Article 6 c) when deciding on the actual system whereby the exchange of information provided for in this Directive is to be e.ectedandon any change to it;
Sellest ka nimetus: ¶standardite ja tehniliste normide komiteeƒ výi ¶98/34/Eâ komitee•.
The Commission shall submit to the Committee a report on the implementation and application of the procedures set out in this Directive, and shall present proposals aimed at eliminating exist-ing or foreseeable barriers to trade.
Erivolitused seoses tehnilistest normidest teavitamise korraga korra rakendamisel tekkinud praktiliste probleemide lahenda-mist, siseriiklike ýigusnormide eelnýudest mitteteavitamise týttu komisjoni poolt algatatud rikkumismenetluste lýpetamist výimaldavate lahenduste leidmist výi selliste menetluste vêlti-mist.
The Committee shall express its opinion on the communications and proposals referred to in paragraph 2 and may in this connec-tion propose, in particular, that the Commission:
Komisjon peab konsulteerima alalise komiteega seoses kýikide vastavalt direktiivi I ja II lisas esitatud Euroopa ja rahvuslike standardiorganisatsioonide nimistute muudatustega ning seo-ses rahvuslike ja Euroopa standardimisprogrammide esitusvor-minguga.
› request the European standards institutions to draw up a Euro-pean standard within a given time limit,
Ta peab andma oma arvamuse teabe s Ÿ s t e m a t i s e e r i t u d esita-mist kêsitlevate ýigusnormide kohta, seda nii nende ýigusnor-mide koostamisel kui ka nende kohandamisel kýikide direktiivi teatise muudatusega.
However, the Committee and the national authorities may, provided that the necessary precautions are taken, consult, for an expert opin-ion, natural or legal persons, including persons in the private sector.
Lisaks arvatud 98/34/Eâ komitee koosolekutele laiendavad liik-mesriikides korraldatud koosolekud ehk ¶pakettkoosolekud• vajaduse korral otsekontakte eelnýu koostamise eest vastuta-vate riigiasutuste esindajate ja komisjoni osakondade vahel.
› ensure where necessary, in order to avoid the risk of barriers to trade, that initially the Member States concerned decide amongst themselves on appropriate measures,
Enne standardiorganisatsioonidele mandaadi andmist veen-dub komisjon alati selles, et tal on liikmesriikide poliitiline toe-tus, konsulteerides sel eesmêrgil komitee vahendusel Euroopa tasandil alustatava standardimistûû asjakohasuse ja ýigeaeg-suse k Ÿ s i m u s t e s .
› take all appropriate measures,
Sel ajal výtavad liikmesriigid kýik
In this case, the Committee must take the necessary precautions in order to safeguard the legitimate and duly ju s t i - « e d i n t e r e s t s o ft h e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s .
Alaline komitee jêlgib ka mandaadi alusel tehtava tûû edene-mist ning arutab mitmeid probleeme seoses standardimisega direktiivi 98/34/Eâ raames.
Articles 5 and 6 describe the composition and role of the Stand-ing Committee, which is referred to repeatedly in the provisions of Directive 98/34/EC.
vajalikud meetmed selle tagamiseks, et nende standardiorga-nisatsioonid ei koosta ega kehtesta standardeid samas vald-konnas (vt artiklit 7).
Because of its varied responsibilities, the Standing Committee has general powers, common to the two aspects of Directive 98/34/EC, and speci«cpowerslimitedtoeachofthem.
Seetýt-tu on neil ajend standardiorganisatsioonide tûû hýlbustami-seks ning Euroopa standardite têieliku kohaldamise výimalike takistuste kýrvaldamiseks.
It has competence for standards and techni-cal regulations, and constitutes the focal point for discussion of all the problems connected with the implementation of the Directive.
Lisaks sellele konsulteeritakse alalise komiteega vastavalt uue lêhenemisviisi direktiividele ka seoses výimalike puudustega mandaadi alusel koostatavates standardites.
Any question relating to the implementation of the Directive can be brought before the Standing Committee at the request of its Chairman or of a Member State.
See menetlus on tuntud kui Ÿhtlustatud standardite kohaste ametlike vastuvêi-dete menetlus.
In addition, it must be consulted by the Commission on certain points, including the choice of the system to be used in prac-tice for the exchange of information laid down by the Direc-tive.
Vt Euroopa standardimise teatmikku: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/standards_policy/vademecum/index.htm.
Speci«cpowersundertheprocedureapplicabletotechni-cal regulations.
Komisjoni aruanded Euroopa Parlamendile, ministrite nýuko-gule ja Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteele kirjeldavad di-rektiivi toimivust výrdlusajal.
The meetings of the Standing Committee enable the Commis-sion departments and the Member States to exchange views on all aspects of the application of the `technical regulations' part of the Directive.
Samuti on vahetult kêttesaadavad komisjoni poolt CENile, CENELECile výi ETSI-le antud Ÿlesannete loend (¶mandaadid•) ja komisjoni poolt direktiivi 98/34/Eâ alusel saadud teabe pýh-jal koostatud statistika, mis avaldatakse igal aastal Euroopa Lii-du Teatajas (ELT).
The Standing Committee must be consulted by the Commis-sion on any amendment to the lists of European or national standardisation bodies shown in the Annexes I and respective-ly II of the Directive, and on the presentation format of national and European standards programmes.
Hiljemalt kaks aastat pêrast 1999. aasta 5. augustit esitab komis-jon Euroopa Parlamendile ja nýukogule hinnangu direktiivi 98/34/Eâ kohaldamise kohta, eelkýige artikli 1 punktis 2 viidatud teenuste tehnoloogia ja turu arengu kohta.
It must give its opinion on the rules regarding the codi«edpresen-tation of information, both when these rules are drafted and when they are adapted to each amendment of the Noti«cationdirective.
Kui liikmesriigid tehnilised normid vastu výtavad, lisavad nad nendesse normidesse výi nende ametliku avaldamise korral nen-de juurde viite kêesolevale direktiivile. Viitamise viisi nêevad ette liikmesriigid.
It draws up a list of national authorities, other than cen-tral governments, whose technical regulations fall within the scope of the Directive and examines any draft amendment to this list.
Selleks výtab komisjon arvesse kýiki talle liikmesriikide poolt edas-tatud têhelepanekuid.
The Committee is also the forum for discussion of numerous issues, from technical problems encountered in the exchange of information by electronic mail, to the di/cultiesarisingfromtheoverlapping of the 98/34/EC procedure with the noti«cationpro-cedures provided for by other Community acts; certain noti«eddraft technical regulations are placed on the agenda with a view to «ndingsolutionstospeci«cproblemsraised.
See artikkel nýuab liikmesriikidelt nende poolt vastu výetud uute tehniliste normide teksti avaldamisel sellesse výi selle juurde viite lisamist direktiivile 98/34/Eâ. Viite sýnastuse otsus-tavad liikmesriigid.
It must also be consulted on any request (mandate) which the Commission plans to give to CEN, CENELEC or ETSI, for the preparation of harmonised European standards.
Kuigi see viide ei taga direktiivi sêtete absoluutset jêrgimist liik-mesriikide poolt, výimaldab see vêhemalt eeldada, et tehnili-sest normist on nýuetekohaselt teavitatud.
Apart from the 98/34/EC Committee, meetings organised with-in the Member States, known as `package' meetings, extend, where necessary, direct contacts between the representatives
Selles artiklis on sêtestatud komisjoni kohustused seoses teabe lêbipaistvuse tagamisega direktiivi 98/34/Eâ kohaldamisel, seda nii liidu kodanike poliitilisi ja majanduslikke huve esinda-vate Ÿhenduse asutuste ja organisatsioonide kui ka kodanike endi suhtes.
Before giving a mandate to the standardisation bodies, the Commission always ensures that it has the political support of the Member States by consulting them through the Commit-
23. mail 2003. aastal avaldatud viimase aruande KOM(2003) 200 lýplik versioon, mis hýlmab ajavahemikku 1999›2001.KOM(2003) 69 lýplik,13.2.2003.
tee on the relevance and timeliness of undertaking standardi-sation work on a European level.
peamiselt selle kohaldamise laiendamiseks i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a tee-nustele. Kýnealune laiendus jýustus 5. augustil 1999.
tive to facilitate the work of the standardisation bodies and en-deavour to remove any possible obstacles to the full applica-tion of European standards.
Sellel kohustusel on oluline têhtsus seoses eraisikute informee-ritusega, kes výivad tehnilise normi sellest eelnevalt teavitama-ta vastuvýtmisel kasutada oma vastavaid ýigusi (vt jêrgmises p e a t Ÿ k i s viidatud ¶CIA Securityƒ kohtuotsust).
The Standing Committee also reviews progress of mandated work and discusses several problems relating to standardisa-tion in the framework of Directive 98/34/EC.
Kýnealuste direktiivide Ÿlevýtmise viis jêeti nagu muudegi di-rektiivide korral liikmesriikide otsustada vastavalt asutamisle-pingu artiklile 249, milles on sêtestatud: ¶Direktiiv on saavutata-va tulemuse seisukohalt siduv iga liikmesriigi suhtes, kellele see on adresseeritud, kuid jêtab vormi ja meetodite valiku selle riigi ame-tiasutustele•.
A positive response from the Standing Committee leads the Commission to invite the European standardisation bodies to prepare one or more standards within a given period.
Direktiiv 83/189/EMâ výeti vastu 28. mêrtsil 1983 ning see jýus-tus 1. aprillil 1984.
During this period, the Member States will take all necessary measures to ensure that their respective standardisation bodies neither prepare nor introduce standards in the same « e l d ( s e e A r t i c l e 7 ) .
Direktiivi muudeti esimest korda direktiiviga 88/182/EMâ, mis jýustus 1. jaanuaril 1989. Direktiivi teine muu-datus jýustus 1. juulil 1995 ning see tehti direktiiviga 94/10/Eâ.
The fact that the national authorities participate in the award of mandates has the result of involving them in the results of European standardisation work. They therefore have an incen-
Kord kodi«tseeriti22.juuni1998.aastadirektiiviga98/34/Eâning seda muudeti 20. juuli 1998. aasta direktiiviga 98/48/Eâ,
Moreover this standing Committee is also consulted on pos-sible shortcoming in mandated standards, as stipulated in New Approach Directives. This procedure is known as the procedure for formal objections against an harmonised standard.
Direktiivi 98/34/Eâ iseloomustab asjaolu, et see sisaldab palju menetluseeskirju, mida liikmesriigid peavad rakendama, asuta-des selleks asjakohased asutused ja kehtestades asjakohased haldusmehhanismid.
See the Vademecum on European Standardization: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/standards_policy/vademecum/index.htm
Vastupidiselt mêêrusele, mis ¶on tervikuna siduv• ja ¶vahetult kohaldatav kýikides liikmesriikides•.
Chapter V: The Application of the Directive
dete ja i n f o Ÿ h i s k o n n a teenuste kêttesaadavust p i i r i Ÿ l e s e l tasandil.
Reports and statistics
VI p e a t Ÿ k k : eraisikute ja tûûstuse juurdepêês teabele ning nende výimalikud ýiguskaitsevahendid
The reports which the Commission must submit to the Euro-pean Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Economic and Social Committee describe the operation of the Directive during the reference period. A speci«creportfromthe Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the evaluation of the application of Directive 98/34/EC in the « e l d o f I n f o r m a t i o n S o c i e t y s e r v i c e s w a s p u b l i s h e d i n 2 0 0 3 t o take stock of the situation since the Directive was extended to this sector in August 1999.
Kuigi direktiivi 98/34/Eâ rakendamine on eelkýige standardi-test ja tehnilistest normidest teavitamise korraga seotud pool-te › komisjon, liikmesriigid, Euroopa ja rahvuslikud standardi-organisatsioonid › asi, on rahvuslike standardite ja tehniliste normide eelnýude kohane teave oluline kýikide liidu kodanike huvidest lêhtuvalt.
The Commission shall report every two years to the European Par-liament, the Council and the Economic and Social Committee on the results of the application of this Directive.
Need mêrkused výib saata otse komisjoni asjaomastele osa-kondadele výi tehniliste normide korral direktiivi 98/34/Eâ haldamise eest vastutavatele siseriiklikele asutustele.
Lists of standardisa-tion work entrusted to the European standardisation organisa-tions pursuant to this Directive, as well as statistics on the noti«ca-tions received, shall be published on an annual basis in the O / c i a l Jo u r n a l of the European Communities.
Ko-misjon ja liikmesriigid výivad seejêrel saata neile esitatud mêrkuste alusel teatanud liikmesriigile oma mêrkused výi Ÿksikasjalikud aruanded, pidades silmas eelnýus leitud pro-tektsionistlike elementide kýrvaldamist.
The list of tasks entrusted by the Commission to CEN, CENELEC or ETSI (`mandates'), and the statistics prepared by the Com-mission on the basis of communications received under Direc-tive 98/34/EC, are also directly accessible, since they are pub-lished every year in the O / c i a l Jo u r n a l o ft h e E u r op e a n U n i o n ( O J E U ) .
Euroopa Liidu kodanikele ja ettevýtjatele direktiiviga 98/34/Eâ antud výimaluste têielikuks êrakasutamiseks peavad eraisikud ja ettevýtjad kasutama komisjoni poolt kêttesaadavaks tehtud teabeallikaid. Sellised teabeallikad on:
Not later than three years from the above mentioned date, the Commission shall, if neces-sary, make proposals to the European Parliament and to the Coun-cil for a revision of the said Directive.
› osalema nende tegevusvaldkonnaga seotud standardite koostamisel sellise tûû algatanud rahvusliku asutuse stan-dardimiskomitees,
When Member States adopt a technical regulation, it shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such refer-ence on the occasion of its o/cialpublication.Themethodsofmaking such reference shall be laid down by Member States.
› Komisjon avaldab igal aastal Euroopa Liidu Teatajas loendi uuest standardimistûûst, mille ta on mandaatidega CENile, CENELECile výi ETSI-le teha andnud (vastavalt direktiivi ar-tiklile 11).
To this end, the Commission shall take into account any observa-tions that might be communicated to it by Member States.
Nii on tootjad výimelised selliste standardi-te ja tehniliste normide kehtestamisel kohe eksportima nendele têielikult vastavaid tooteid,
This Article sets out the Commission's obligations in respect of guaranteeing the transparency of information on the applica-tion of Directive 98/34/EC, both as regards the Community insti-tutions and bodies representing the political and economic in-terests of the citizens of the Union, and the citizens themselves.
› Komisjon avaldab igal aastal ELTs saadud teated, reageerin-gud nendele teadetele ja direktiiviga kehtestatud kohustus-te mittetêitmise pýhjusel aasta jooksul algatatud rikkumis-menetlused (vastavalt direktiivi artiklile 11).
This Article requires Member States to make reference to Direc-tive 98/34/EC either in the text of the new technical regulations they adopt or as an accompaniment to this text at the time of its publication.
› esitama oma seisukohti vajalike muudatuste kohta kavan-datavates tehnilistes normides, mille vastuvýtmine výib pýhjustada kaubandustýkete tekkimist, et hýlbustada too-
The last report, published under the reference COM(2003) 200 «nal,23May2003coverstheperiod1999›2001.COM(2003) 69 «nal,13.2.2003.
› Komisjon avaldab igal nêdalal ELTs direktiiviga 98/34/Eâ kehtestatud korra alusel teavitatud siseriiklike tehniliste
Statistics relating to technical regulations n o t i « e d i n 2 0 0 4 u n d e r D i r e c t i v e 98/34/EC were published in OJ C 158, 29.6.2005, p. 20.
Vt 2004. aastal direktiivi 98/34/Eâ alusel teatatud statistilisi andmeid ELT C 158, 29.6.2005, lk 20.
The procedure was then c o d i « e d b y D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C o f 2 2 Juffn e 1998 and m o d i « e d b y D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 4 8 / E C o f 2 0 Ju l y 1 9 9 8 , m a i n l y to extend its application to Information Society services.
normide pealkirjad ning kýikide juhtumite kohta direktiivi-ga ette nêhtud algse kolmekuulise ooteaja lýppemise kuu-pêevad (kui komisjon aktsepteerib liikmesriigi kiireloomuli-suse taotluse, siis avaldatakse ka see teave ELTs).
Although this reference is not an absolute guarantee of com-pliance by the Member State with the provisions of the Direc-tive, it does at least establish a presumption that the technical regulation has been duly noti«ed.
› Kasutajad výivad rahvuslikesse standardimisprogrammi-desse lisatud eelnýude tekstide hankimiseks pûûrduda rah-vuslike standardiorganisatsioonide poole, kes on CENi výi CENELECi liikmed.
This obligation is of fundamental importance for the informa-tion of private individuals, who are authorised to assert their rights in the case of the adoption of a technical regulation with-out prior noti«cation(seethe`CIASecurity'judgment,referredto in the following Chapter).
› Tûûstuse juurdepêêsu hýlbustamiseks siseriiklikele tehnilis-tele normidele on komisjon loonud kýiki teavitatud tekste sisaldava ulatusliku andmebaasi nimega TRIS (tehniliste eeskirjade t e a b e s Ÿ s t e e m ) , mis on avalikkusele juurdepêêse-tav Euroopa veebilehel.