natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ pilot projects and subsidies to NGOs or voluntary organisations working towards these aims, in particular working for the rights and the protection of children, young people and women, in particular regarding sexual abuse.
‡ selles suunas tûûtavate valitsusvêliste ja vabatahtlike organisatsioonide katseprojektid ning rahaline toetus, eelkýige nende organisatsioonide, mis tûûtavad laste, noorte ja naiste ýi-guste ning kaitse eest, eelkýige seksuaalse vêêrkohtlemise vastu.
The 1997 priorities clearly re‹ectedthepoliticalimpetusbehindtheinitiativeinthewakeofthe `Dutroux a . a i r ' i n B e l g i u m a n d t h e W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a - t i o n of Children.
1997. aasta prioriteedid peegeldasid selgelt algatust mýjutanud poliitilist impulssi, mille and-sid Dutroux' juhtum Belgias ja laste seksuaalse ekspluateerimise vastane maailmakongress.
Sexual violence is mentioned in three of the six stated measures and the call for actions `aimed at tackling international paedophile rings' is a clear if unrealistic echo of public and political concerns of the time.
Kuuest nimetatud tegevusest kolmes nimetatakse seksuaalvêgivalda ning Ÿleskutse výtta meetmeid, mis on suunatud rahvusvaheliste pedo«iliagruppidetakistamisele,kajastabselgelt,kuid ebarealistlikult tolle aja avalikkuse ja poliitiliste ringkondade muresid.
In fact, it was unlikely that NGOs would consider themselves as the appropriate instigators of actions targeting international paedophile rings and indeed it is unlikely that the selection panel formed to review the submissions would have looked favourably on any project that demonstrated ignorance of the limits of NGO actions in what is clearly primarily a police investigation and law-enforcement task.
Tegelikult oli ebatýenêoline, et valitsusvêlised organisatsioonid peaksid ennast sobivateks rahvusvaheliste pedo«iliagruppidevastasetegevusealgatajateks,javeelgiebatýenêolisem,etprojektitaot-luste lêbivaatamiseks moodustatav hindamiskomitee oleks toetanud projekte, mis oleks il-mutanud výhiklikkust valitsusvêliste organisatsioonide pêdevuspiiride suhtes olukorras, kus tegemist on selgelt eelkýige politsei ja ýiguskaitseasutuste Ÿlesannetega.
The call for a Community-wide child helpline was also from the political wish-list rather than from «eldexperience.Therehadbeenanumberofsuccessfulnationalchildren'shelplinessetup in Europe (in the UK, for example, and in Italy) in the 1990s, and it is understandable that the Commission might have wished to explore the possibility of extending this experience across the Community.
Kogu Euroopa âhendust hýlmava laste usaldustelefoni loomine kuulus ka rohkem poliiti-liste soovide kui praktiliste kogemuste kategooriasse. Euroopas oli 1990ndatel aastatel loodud hulgaliselt riigi tasandil edukalt toimivaid laste usaldustelefone (nt âhendkuning-riigis ja Itaalias) ja arusaadavalt soovis komisjon p Ÿ Ÿ d a seda laiendada kogu Ÿhendusele.
In practice, however, a number of exploratory e . o r t s bo t h i n D a p h n e - f u n d e d projects, and through a working conference supported by EU-wide research and con-vened by the Commission itself in 1998, showed that varied and deeply established technical, u s e r - p r o « l e a n d l o g i s t i c a l i s s u e s i n t h e Mffe m b e r S t a t e s m a d e a s i n g l e Cffo m mstu n i tffy - w i d e h e l - p l i n e service impossible to achieve (at least given realities then current in telephone technol-ogy, structures and use).
Tegelikult nêitasid nii Daphne rahastatud projektide raames tehtud uuringud kui tûûkon-verents, mida toetasid kýikjal liidus lêbiviidud uuringud ning mille kutsus kokku komisjon 1998. aastal, et liikmesriikide erinevad ja s Ÿ g a v a l t juurdunud tehnilised, kasutajaeelistus-tega seotud ja logistilised lahendused ei výimalda Ÿhtse, kogu Ÿhendust hýlmava usaldus-telefoni loomist (vêhemalt mitte nendes oludes, mis sel ajal telefonitehnoloogias, -struk-tuurides ja kasutustes valitsesid).
Aims and priorities
Eesmêrgid ja prioriteedid pýhimýtte mýistlikest kokkupuutepunktidest.
Proposals were to meet the following criteria:
Taotlused pidid vastama jêrgmistele kriteeriu-mitele:
‡ ability to present added value at European Union level ̌ projects focusing not only on the immediate (local, regional or national) situation but seeking to contribute to development at a European level;
‡ suutlikkus pakkuda lisavêêrtust Euroopa Liidu tasandil: projektide têhelepanu keskmes ei pidanud olema mitte ainult vahetu (kohalik, piirkondlik výi riigi) olukord, vaid need pidid kaasa aitama arengule kogu Euroopa tasandil;
‡ innovation in terms of content and organisation;
‡ sisuline ja organisatsiooniline novaatorlikkus;
‡ aims to promote best practice in the area(s) concerned;
‡ eesmêrk edendada head tava asjaomases valdkonnas (asjaomastes valdkondades);
‡ ability to permit transnational exchanges;
‡ riikidevahelise vahetuse výimaldamine;
‡ a target of transferable results, containing result indicators related to the objectives, with detailed provisions for monitoring against these indicators.
‡ Ÿlekantavate tulemuste eesmêrk, sisaldades eesmêrkidega seotud tulemusnêitajaid ning nendele nêitajatele vastava seire Ÿksikasjalikku kirjeldust.
The Commission believed that the thematic and programmatic aims outlined in the call for proposals were most likely to be achieved through projects that included the following ac-tivities:
Komisjon arvas, et projektikonkursiks vêljatûûtatud temaatiliste ja programmiliste eesmêr-kide saavutamiseks sobivad kýige enam jêrgmisi tegevusi sisaldavad projektid:
‡ training and exchanges, primarily for personnel of NGOs and private associations;
‡ eelkýige valitsusvêliste ja e r a Ÿ h i n g u t e tûûtajate koolitus ja vahetus;
‡ pilot projects demonstrating clear European interest and value added;
‡ katseprojektid, mis vêljendavad selget Euroopa huvi ja annavad lisavêêrtust;
‡ the setting-up or reinforcement of European networks, particularly for the promotion and coordination of information and focused on protection and prevention;
‡ Euroopa výrgustike loomine ja tugevdamine, mis on eelkýige suunatud infovahetuse eden-damisele ja kooskýlastamisele ning keskendatud kaitse- ja ennetustegevusele;
‡ studies and research;
‡ uuringud ja teadustûû;
‡ dissemination of information including through campaigns, brochures, newsletters, media presentations, etc. to raise awareness of the problems and to encourage non-violence;
‡ info levitamine koos kampaaniate, b r o þ Ÿ Ÿ r i d e , u u d i s b Ÿ l l e t ê ê n i d e , meediaesitlustega jne, mis teadvustaks probleeme ja soodustaks vêgivallatut suhtlemist;
‡ promotion of cooperation between NGOs and public authorities, including law-enforce-ment and judicial bodies.
‡ koostûû edendamine valitsusvêliste organisatsioonide ja ametiasutuste vahel, sh ýigus-kaitseasutuste ja kohtutega.
Although these criteria, aims and priorities presented a formidable challenge to the planning capacity of NGOs, many of whom had worked broadly in child protection but not speci«callyon violence and rarely at pan-European level, the 47 projects selected in 1997 were well fo-cused and succeeded in `tuning in' to the Commission's multi-faceted guidelines.
Kuigi need kriteeriumid, eesmêrgid ja prioriteedid olid Ÿliraskeks vêljakutseks valitsusvêliste organisatsioonide planeerimissuutlikkusele, sest paljud neist tegutsesid peamiselt lastekait-sega, kuid mitte konkreetselt vêgivallaga ja mitte Ÿleeuroopalisel tasandil, valiti 1997. aastal vêlja 47 projekti, mille eesmêrgid olid ýigesti seatud ja mis sobisid hêsti komisjoni mitmeta-huliste suunistega.
Since the Daphne initiative and programme comprise projects submitted rather than projects commissioned, the eventual focus of the projects depends entirely on what the proposing organisations wish to work on (within the general guidelines provided).
Kuna Daphne algatus (ja programm) rajaneb projektitaotlustel, mitte tellitud projektidel, sýl-tub iga projekti konkreetne sisu têielikult sellest, millega taotluse esitanud organisatsioon soovib tegelda (vastavalt antud Ÿldsuunistele).
Consequently, by the second call for proposals in March 1998, there were already `gaps' in the range of project ac-tivity being undertaken, so the 1998 call listed these areas and stated that priority would be given to «llingthem.
Sellest tulenevalt tekkisid teisel projektikon-kursil 1998. aasta mêrtsis ¶ l Ÿ n g a d ƒ , mille tulemusena jêid mýned tegevused katmata, ning 1998. aasta konkursi puhul loeti prioriteetseteks just sellised katmata tegevused.
The lessons of 1997 had been well learned and the call for proposals to set up an EU-wide helpline was not repeated in the general call (9).
1997. aasta ýppetunnid omandati hêsti ning Ÿldkonkursis ei korraldatud enam kogu ELi hýl- mava usaldustelefoni projektikonkurssi.9 Selle asemel sisaldasid Ÿldtegevused jêrgmist:
) In fact, a separate call for a project in which this issue could be researched thoroughly was issued in 1999 and preceded by a meeting of all European helpline operators, and some from the candidate countries, jointly hosted by the Commission and Unicef. 葵emeetingcon#rmedthedivergence of opinions and structures, and the subsequent round of project submissions proved to be inadequate, focusing more on extending current national experience rather than fully exploring the divergences and potential noted in the conference.
Tegelikult kuulutati 1999. aastal välja eraldi projektikonkurss küsimuse p÷hjalikuks uurimiseks ning sellele eelnes komisjoni ja UNICEFi ühiselt korraldatud kohtumine, kus osalesid k÷ik Euroopa ning m÷ned kandidaatriikide usaldustelefonide operaatorid. Kohtumine kinnitas nii arvamuste kui ka struktuuride lahknevust ning laekunud projekte peeti ebapiisavaks, sest nende sisuks oli olemasoleva riigisisese kogemuse levitamine kaugemale, mitte konverentsil r÷hutatud lahknevuste ja v÷imaluste täielikum uurimine.
No projects were recommended as a result and the issue disappeared altogether from the Daphne radar screen.
Ühtki projekti ei soovitatud ja küsimus kadus Daphne huviorbiidist täielikult.
‡ promoting the introduction of instruments designed to encourage the reporting of vio-lence against children, young people and women, and forms of tra/ckinginwomenforthe purpose of sexual exploitation in accordance with arrangements which are similar in all Member States.
Ebarealistlik projektikonkurss ¶rahvusvaheliste pedo«iliagruppidetakistamiseksƒvýetiprio-riteetsete tegevuste hulgast maha ja sýnastati valitsusvêliste organisatsioonide tarvis sobiva-malt selliste tegevuste nimekirjas, ¶mis ei ole piisavalt hêsti kaetudƒ:
A brief history of Daphne
Eesmêrgid ja prioriteedid
This left the possibilities open for broader exploration of reporting mechanisms beyond telephone helplines (for example drop-in centres, police help-desks, etc.).
‡ laste kaitsmine p e d o « i l i d e e e s t , t ý s t e s Ÿ l d s u s e t e a d l i k k u s t p e d o « i l s e k ê i t u m i s e o l e m u s e s t , r e t s i d i v i s m i s t ja pedo«iliavýrkudeloomisestningpornograa«akasutamisest, millega muutus see uurimuslikuks ning asja olemust lahtimýtestavamaks, mitte enam otseselt ¶takistavaksƒ meetmeks.
The unrealistic call for projects `to tackle international paedophile rings' was removed from the priority areas and r e d e « n e d i n m o r e a p p r op r i a t e N G O t e r m s i n t h e l i s t o f ` a r e a s w h i c h h a v e nffo t yet been adequately covered' as:
Lisas nimetusega ¶âlevaade 1997. aastal programmi kaetud tegevustest ja teatavatest veel katmata tegevustestƒ tehti esimesi katseid, et organisatsioonid ei dubleeriks juba alustatud tegevusi, selle asemel julgustati neid mitmekesistama výi edasi arendama eelnevalt omanda-tud kogemust, mis ideaalkujul peaks laiendama olemasoleva kogemuse, ýppetundide výi materjalide kasutusvêlja teistesse liikmesriikidesse. Vêljatoodud katmata tegevused olid all-jêrgnevad:
‡ protecting children from paedophile activity by increasing understanding of the nature of paedophile behaviour, recidivism and the role of paedophile networking and use of pornography, thus becoming a research/understanding action rather than direct `tackling'.
‡ kaitsetustegurite ja kaitset vajavate gruppide mêêratlemine ning nendest tulenevate kait-semehhanismide vêljaarendamine: jêllegi p Ÿ Ÿ e mýista olemust kui tegevuse alust;
In an annex entitled `Summary of the areas of activity covered by the programme in 1997 and of certain areas not yet covered', «rstattemptsweremadetoencourageorganisationstoavoidduplicating actions that had already been taken and to either diversify or develop ways to build on previous experience, ideally by broadening the application of existing experiences, lessons or materials to other Member States. Gaps identi«edwere:
‡ vêêrkohtlemine laiemas p e r e r Ÿ h m a s , m e e s t e r Ÿ h m i t u s t e s (nt sýjavêgi, meestest koosnev suletud Ÿhiskond) ja kýnealuse r Ÿ h m i t u s e vêêrkohtlemise kirjeldus: vastukaaluks seksuaal-sele ekspluateerimisele ning laiemale vêêrkohtlemise ja soolise vêgivalla kêsitlusele, mis peegeldab nendes k Ÿ s i m u s t e s toimuva rahvusvahelise arutelu trende;
‡ the identi«cationofvulnerabilityfactorsandgroupsandthedevelopmentofprotectionmechanisms based on these ̌ again an attempt to prompt understanding as a basis for action;
‡ ýpetajate, hooldajate, ýdede-vendade, perekonna, Ÿhiskonna ja muude potentsiaalsete kaitsjate roll ning kuidas suurendada nende mýju naiste ja laste kaitsmisel vêêrkohtlemise eest: l Ÿ h i k e katse leida výimalusi k o d a n i k u Ÿ h i s k o n n a kaitse mobiliseerimiseks ja týhusta-miseks;
‡ abuse within the extended family group, within male groupings (e.g. armed forces, closed male society) and the abuse pro«leofsuchgroupingšade-emphasisonsexualexploi-tation and a broadening to wider issues of abuse and gendered violence, re‹ectingemerg-ing trends in international debate on these issues;
‡ vêêrkohtlemise tunnused ja kuidas neid êra tunda, nendest teatada ning sekkuda vêêrkoht-lemise ajal: oluline eesmêrgistatud ¶teadlikkuse týstmiseƒ variant, mille eesmêrgiks on anda vahendeid neile, kellel on výimalik vêêrkohtlemise eest kaitsta, nii et nad tunneksid êra, millal tuleks vêêrkohtlemise lýpetamiseks tegutseda ja kuidas ohvrit aidata;
‡ the role of teachers, carers, siblings, family, society and other potential protectors and how to maximise their impact to protect women and children from abuse ̌ a concise attempt to «ndwaystomobiliseandempowercivilsocietyprotectionagents;
‡ alaealiste ýigused ja ohvri kaitsmine, et ta uuesti ohvriks ei saaks: suurenev probleem rahvusvahelisel tasandil ja Euroopas, eelkýige seoses inimkaubanduse ohvrite kriminali-seerumisega;
‡ the signs of abuse and how to recognise and report them with a view to intervening during abuse ̌ an important, targeted version of `awareness-raising' which aimed to provide tools so that those who are in a position to protect from abuse can recognise when they should act to stop the abuse and support the victim;
‡ vêgivallatsejate kêitumismudelid ja kriminaalse koostûû meetodid: oluline esimene samm kuritegude toimepanijate valdkonda sekkumisel ning têhtis vêide vajadusest mýista, kuidas nad tegutsevad;
‡ juvenile justice and protecting the victim from being re-victimised ̌ an emerging issue at international level and in Europe in particular in relation to the criminalisation of tra/ck-ing victims;
‡ vêêrkoheldud naiste ja laste toetusmehhanismid, týhus teatamine ja sekkumine: esimene konkreetse otsese toetusmeetme mainimine, mis viis selleni, et valitsusvêliste organisat-sioonide ringis hakati Daphnet pidama ¶ohvripýhiseksƒ programmiks;
‡ behaviour patterns of abusers and methods of criminal cooperation ̌ an important «rststep in intervening in the area of the perpetrator and an important statement of the need to understand how they work;
‡ vêgivallaohvrite eneseabimehhanismid: ettepanek edendada ohvrite têielikku osalemist ja neile volituste andmine, see ongi kogu algatuste ja programmi lêbiv teema;
‡ support mechanisms for women and children being abused and e.ectivereportingandintervention ̌ « r s t mffe n t i o nffo f s p e c i « c d i r e c t s up po r t a c t i o n , w h i c h l e d t o D a p h n e b e i n g cffo n s i d e r e d in NGO circles as a `victim-based' programme;
‡ statistilised uuringud vêêrkohtlemise mudelitest, demograa«listesttrendidest,kaitsetutestgruppidest jne: tunnistuseks, et Euroopa vêgivallaprobleemi statistiline kaardistamine on êêrmiselt puudulik, see on jêrgmistel aastatel Ÿha uuesti esile kerkiv teema;
‡ self-help mechanisms for victims of violence ̌ a suggestion to promote full participation of victims and their empowerment, a theme that continued throughout the initiative and programme;
‡ vêêrkohtlejate ja ohvrite kêitumise muutumine: ettepanek, mis p Ÿ Ÿ d i s leida teed, kuidas ¶teadlikkuse týstmisestƒ edasi liikuda kêitumise tegeliku muutumiseni;
‡ statistical overviews of patterns of abuse, demographic trends, vulnerable groups, etc. ̌ recognition of the dire paucity of statistical mapping of the problem of violence in Europe, a recurring theme in subsequent years;
‡ eraelu puutumatuse ja avalikustamise roll: vastusena esimeste aastate projektikonkursside a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s i l e , kus paljud projektid osutasid nýrgale ohvrite ja vêêrkohtlejate kon«dentsiaal-susýiguste mýistmisele, see on mis tahes andmete kogumise ja sêilitamise eeltingimus;
‡ behaviour modi«cationofabusersandvictimšsuggestingthoughtonwaystomovebeyond `awareness-raising' to promote actual change in behaviour;
‡ lapse ja naise imago ning reklaami, ringhêêlingu ja t r Ÿ k i m e e d i a ning muu massimeedia roll kaitse- ja ennetustegevuses: p Ÿ Ÿ e teavitada Euroopa pressitegelasi ja neid mobiliseerida ajal, mil laialdane kýnealuse teema kêsitlus nêitab jêtkuvat vêhest mýistmist;
‡ role of privacy and disclosure ̌ a response to analysis of the «rstyear'sproposals,wheremany projects demonstrated poor understanding of the rights of con«dentialityofbothvictims and perpetrators, and a prerequisite for any work on data collection and storage;
‡ pornograa«a,eritilastepornograa«amýju:mýeldudtêiendusenamujalkomisjonisteh-tavale tûûle vahendite osas, mida kasutatakse pornograa«aedastamiseks.
In the event, the projects subsequently accepted for funding did indeed re‹ectthesesugges-tions, even if they did not in most cases exactly reproduce them.
Rahastamisele minevad projektid kajastasidki neid eesmêrke, kuigi need ei olnud alati Ÿ k s Ÿ h e - s e s vastavuses.
Many more projects in the second year of the Daphne initiative aimed to undertake research or studies as a basis for then developing actions or tools for action.
Daphne algatuse teisel aastal oli palju rohkem projekte suunatud teadustûû-le výi uuringutele, mis on seejêrel arendatavate tegevuste výi tegevusvahendite aluseks.
Many of the projects aimed to «lltheidenti«edgapsin a modest way by «rstpilotingactionswithindistinctvulnerablegroupssuchasruralwom-en, or young people living in institutions.
Pal-jude projektide eesmêrk oli têita tagasihoidlikul kombel l Ÿ n g a d ning esmalt alustati katsete-gevustega sellistes selgelt kaitsetutes gruppides nagu maanaised výi hooldusasutustes elavad noored.
In this way, the Daphne initiative began to lay the foundations of much more solid and usable knowledge and practical experience.
Nii hakkas Daphne algatus looma alust kindlamatele ja kasutatavamatele teadmis-tele ja praktilisele kogemusele.
E . o r t s t o l e a r n l e s s o n s f r o m i n i t i a l e x p e r i e n c e s o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e , a n d t o bu i l d t h e s e i n t o an improved programme that would be more likely to have real impact, grow the knowl-edge base in Europe and produce value for the European Commission, were supported by the creation in 1998 of a simple newsletter called Daphne News.
Daphne algatust esimeste ýppetundide kogemuste levitamisel ja nende kogumisel têiustatud programmi tervikuks, mis týenêolisemalt suudaks tegelikku mýju avaldada, suurendada teadmistebaasi Euroopas ja luua komisjonile lisavêêrtust, toetati 1998. aastal lihtsa uudiste-lehe Daphne News loomisega.
This Commission initiative was designed s p e c i « c a l l y t o ` po s i t i o n ' D a p h n e a s a p r o g r a m mffe t h a t s up po r t e d a n a l y s i s a n d r e ‹ e c t i o n , i nfo r m a t i o n e x c h a n g e a n d n e t w o r k i n g nffo t o n l y b y o t h e r a g e n c i e s bu t w i t h t h e a c t i v e participation of the Commission.
See komisjoni algatus oli mýeldud konkreetselt selleks, et ku-jundada Daphnest programm, mis toetab a n a l Ÿ Ÿ s i ja tagasisidet, infovahetust ja výrkude loomist mitte ainult teiste ametiasutuste poolt, vaid komisjoni aktiivsel osavýtul.
Daphne News took an informal tone in sharing information on the Daphne initiative itself and on projects that had received monitoring visits.
Daphne News výttis mitteametliku hoiaku teabe jagamisel nii Daphne algatuse kui ka projek-tide suhtes, mis olid lêbinud k o n t r o l l k Ÿ l a s t u s e d .
It was used to share with organisations that were implementing projects or that had already completed project activity ideas about inter-esting projects as well as lists, for example, of newly selected projects.
See leidis kasutamist teabe vahetamisel pro-jekte elluviivate organisatsioonide výi nende, kes olid projektid juba ellu viinud, huvitavate ideede kohta, ning seal esitati nêiteks hiljuti vêljavalitud projektide nimekirjad.
Through this list, in particular, organisations were able to learn about other organisations working in the same area as them in other Member States.
Just nende nimekirjade abil said teised organisatsioonid teada, millised on samal elualal teistes liikmes-riikides tegutsevad organisatsioonid.
Over time, many of the organisations contacted each other and proposed partnerships for new Daphne projects ̌ to the extent, in fact, that peo-ple within the organisations and indeed at the Commission began to talk about `the Daphne family'.
Aja jooksul výtsid paljud organisatsioonid omavahel Ÿhendust ja pakkusid partnerlust uutes Daphne projektides. Asi arenes sellise ulatuseni, et organisatsioonide ning ka komisjoni tûûtajad hakkasid rêêkima ¶Daphne perekonnastƒ.
These partnerships have in many cases continued long beyond the duration of the Daphne project that gave rise to them and in some cases have become structural.
Sel-lised partnerlused on paljudel juhtudel jêtkunud ka pêrast Daphne projekti lýppu ja mýnel juhul on saanud struktuurseks.
For exam-ple, a 1998 project implemented by Radda Barnen (Save the Children Sweden) that identi«eda small NGO as a partner in Spain resulted in the Spanish organisation in time becoming Save the Children Spain.
Nêiteks 1998. aasta projekt, mille viis ellu Rêdda Barnen (Save the Children Sweden), leidis endale partneri Ÿhe vêikese Hispaania m i t t e t u l u n d u s Ÿ h i n g u nêol, aja jooksul kujunes sellest organisatsioonist vêlja Ÿhing Save the Children Spain.
Unfortunately, the compilation, writing and distribution of Daphne News was time-consuming for the small team of people working on the Daphne initiative.
Kahjuks oli vêljaande Daphne News toimetamine, kirjastamine ja levitamine Daphne algatuse raames tûûtavale vêikesele meeskonnale liiga aeganýudev.
Daphne News ceased to exist after the third issue in May 1999 and is now replaced by a website, regularly updated.
Daphne News lýpetas ilmumise pêrast kolmandat numbrit 1999. aasta mais, selle asemel on n Ÿ Ÿ d veebileht, mida ajakohas-tatakse regulaarselt.
Its ad-dress is: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Selle aadress: h t t p : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / fu n d i n g / d a p h n e / fu n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m