natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11) `technical regulation', technical speci«cationsandotherre-quirements, or rules on services, including the relevant adminis-trative provisions, the observance of which is compulsory, de jure or de facto, in the case of marketing, provision of a service, estab-lishment of a service operator or use in a Member State or a major part thereof, as well as laws, regulations or administrative provi-sions of Member States, except those provided for in Article 10, prohibiting the manufacture, importation, marketing or use of a product or prohibiting the provision or use of a service, or estab-lishment as a service provider.
Need arvatakse olevat týhusad vahendid siseriiklikul tasandil kujundatud poliitikate rakendamiseks, eelkýige keskkonna kaitsmist ja teenusesaajaid (eriti tarbijaid) silmas pidades, sest need on suunatud pýhiliselt viimaste kêitumise mýjutamiseks konkreetse toote výi teenuse suhtes.
In de«ningtheconceptof`technicalregulation',Paragraph11provides information regarding the type of texts which must
Direktiiv 98/34/Eâ ei hýlma kýiki liikmesriikide maksu- výi rahandusalaseid ýigusakte, see ainult viitab tehnilistele spetsifikatsioonidele, ¶muudele nýuetele• výi teenuseid kê-sitlevatele nýuetele, mis on seotud fiskaal- výi finantsmeet-metega, mille eesmêrgiks on tarbijate výi teenusesaajate kêitumise muutmine.
› the degree of dependence of the standardisation body on the public authorities.
Fiskaal- výi finantsmeetmed sellisena ei kuulu komisjoni ja liikmesriikide jêrelevalve alla.
The legal form of the relationship be-tween the body and the State, formalised contractually (as in Germany or the United Kingdom) or by regulations (as in
Uuritakse ainult tehniliste spetsifikatsioonide, ¶muude nýuete• výi tee-nuseid kêsitlevate nýuete seda aspekti, mis výib luua kau-bandustýkkeid.
A list of national standardisation contacts is given in annex 2 to this booklet.
Direktiivi kýnealune sête lisati teatavate maksusoodustuste andmise pêrast ¶puhastele sýidukitele•, mis vastasid teatavate-le heitmete piirvêêrtustele výi olid varustatud k a t a l Ÿ Ÿ s m u u n - d u r i t effg a .
However, the formal list of national standardisation bodies is to be found in annex II of the directive.
Kogemused on nêidanud, et liikmesriigid on sageli sidunud soodustused tingimustega, mille tulemusena oli kasu-
In the United States and Canada, on the other hand, the publication of standards is the responsibility of several hundred specialist organisations, each in a speci«csector.
Tuleb rýhutada, et direktiivi kýnealune sête ei hýlma vastavalt asutamislepingu artiklitele 87 ja 88 teatavate ettevýtete výi toodete toetuseks výetavaid «skaal-výi«nantsmeetmeid,mison seotud riigiabiga ning on viimasega kehtestatud konkreet-se erikorra objektiks.
be noti«edundertheprocedurefortheprovisionofinforma-tion established by the Directive in this «eld.
Selles lýikes viidatud asutuste nimistu avaldatakse komisjoni veebilehel.
Certain technical speci«cations,`otherrequirements'orrulesonservices which meet the de«nitionoftechnicalregulationsareexcluded from the scope of the Directive, particularly if they comply with binding Community acts or are limited to imple-menting a judgment of the European Court of Justice, as s p e c i - « e d i n A r t i c l e 1 0 o ft h e D i r e c t i v e .
Vêlja on jêetud ka siseriiklike s o t s i a a l k i n d l u s t u s s Ÿ s t e e m i d e - g a seotud meetmed (nêiteks mêêrus, millega seatakse r a v i - m i h Ÿ v i t i s e andmine sýltuvusse teatavast p a k e n d i t Ÿ Ÿ b i s t ) .
On the one hand there are the technical speci«cationsorotherrequirements or rules on services (see the above de«nitions),which are laid down by the Member States and which are ap-plicable to industrial and agricultural products and to Informa-tion Society services, and on the other there are the laws, regu-lations and administrative provisions of the Member States which prohibit certain speci«edactivities.
12) ¶tehniliste normide eelnýuƒ › tehnilise spetsi«katsiooni,muunýude výi teenuseid kêsitleva nýude tekst, sealhulgas haldusnor-mid, mis on koostatud eesmêrgiga need tehniliste normidena jýustada výi lýpuks jýustada lasta, mis on ettevalmistusetapis, kus saab veel teha olulisi muudatusi.
The `compulsory' nature of a technical speci«cation,an`otherrequirement' or a rule on services may be conferred upon them in two ways:
Viimane liik direktiivis kêsitletud tehnilisi eeskirju, mida tu-leks mêrkida (lisaks tehnilistele spetsifikatsioonidele, ¶muu-dele nýuetele• ja teenuseid kêsitlevatele nýuetele, millega kehtestatakse de jure ja de facto kohustuslikud nýuded), si-saldab toote valmistamise, importimise, turustamise ja ka-sutamise výi teenuse pakkumise výi kasutamise výi teenust pakkuva ettevýtte rajamise keelamiseks ette nêhtud siseriik-likke seadusi, mêêrusi ja haldusmeetmeid.
In order to qualify as a technical regulation, a technical speci«-cation, an `other requirement' or a rule on services must ful«lthe following conditions:
See lýige mêêratleb ¶tehnilise normi eelnýu• mýiste: selleks, et teksti kêsitletaks eelnýuna, peab tehniline norm olema etteval-mistusetapis, mis výimaldab tekstis ¶oluliste muudatuste• tege-mist.
1. de jure, when compliance with them is made compulsory by a measure emanating directly from the relevant public au-thorities or attributable to the latter.
Direktiiviga sêtestatud tehnilistest normidest teavitamise kord nêeb ette, et pêrast esitatud eelnýude lêbivaatamise lýpeta-mist výivad komisjon ja liikmesriigid taotleda seadusandjalt si-seturu ýigusnormidega vastuolus oleva teksti muutmist.
› it must be `compulsory' (i.e. `de jure' or `de facto' binding, see hereinafter).
Kýnealusesse keelamist ja sealhulgas kasutamise keelamist kêsitlevate tehniliste normide neljandasse kategooriasse kuulumiseks peab meetmete reguleerimisala ulatuma palju kaugemale toote výi teenuse kasutusalapiirangust ning ei tohi piirduda Ÿksnes nende kasutamise keelamisega.
This characteristic, which is inherent in the doc-uments prepared by the public authorities, to which this Di-rective applies, constitutes the major di.erencebetweenatechnical regulation and a standard, which is prepared by pri-vate bodies and is in essence voluntary;
See tehniliste normide kategooria on mýeldud eelkýige selliste siseriiklike meetmete hýlmamiseks, mis ei výimalda kasuta-da asjaomast toodet Ÿhelgi výimalikul mýistlikul otstarbel, vêlja arvatud ainult marginaalne otstarve.
By way of example, the conditions regarding the small-scale production of jam and preserved fruit, laid down by decree, will be considered to be a technical regulation which is man-datory de jure. The same will apply to a ban on using plastic bottles for the marketing of mineral water, as laid down by ordinance, etc.
Iga liikmesriik otsustab sýltuvalt oma seadusandlikust protses-sist ise, millises etapis tehniliste normidega eelnýud komisjoni-le esitatakse, lêhtudes tingimusest, et eelnýudesse peab olema výimalik teha sisulisi muudatusi.
› it must in‹uencethemarketingoruseofindustrialandagri-cultural products, the provision of a service or the establish-ment of a service operator, in a Member State or a signi«cantpart of that State.
Sellised keelud on niisugusena tehnilise normi êêrmuslik vorm. Vêlja arvatud juhul, kui need on ýigustatud asutamis-lepingu artiklite 30 výi 46 alusel výi need on Euroopa Kohtu praktika alusel proportsionaalsed oluliste nýuetega, on need parima nêitena týkked kaupade ja teenuste vabale liikumi-sele ja asutamisvabadusele Ÿhenduses.
2. de facto, where the technical specification is not laid down by a formal and binding act of the State concerned, but where the State encourages its observance. As a result of the similar effects which they may have upon trade, these measures are considered equivalent to binding regula-tions.
Sellega seoses tuleb arvestada, et siseriiklikku meedet, mis taasloob výi asendab uusi výi têiendavaid spetsifikatsioone lisamata olemasolevaid tehnilisi norme, millest on komisjoni ýigeaegselt teavitatud, kui need on vastu výetud pêrast di-rektiivi 83/189/EMâ jýustumist, ei saa kêsitleda tehnilise normi ¶eelnýuna• direktiivi 98/34/Eâ artikli 1 lýike 12 têhen-duses ning sellest tulenevalt ei kehti nende suhtes teavita-miskohustus.
Paragraph 11 gives three examples of the most important and the most frequent de facto technical regulations, in or-der to clarify a concept which was not de«nedintheinitialversion of the Directive and gave rise to di.erentinterpreta-tions that were prejudicial to the correct implementation of the information procedure.
Kaasa arvatakse liikmesriikide nimetatud asutuste kehtestatud tehnilised normid, mis loetletakse nimistus, mille komisjon artiklis 5 viidatud komitee tûû raames koostab enne 5. augustit 1999.
The administrative provisions applicable to a speci«cation,toan `other requirement' or to a rule on services can also consti-tute technical regulations within the meaning of the Direc-tive.
Kêesolevat direktiivi ei kohaldata nende meetmete suhtes, mida liikmesriigid peavad asutamislepingu alusel vajalikuks isikute,
We shall see later, under Article 7(2) of the Directive that, in certain cases, compliance with the standard may become mandatory, so that it then acquires the status of a `technical regulation'.
21. aprilli 2005. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-267/03: Lars Erik S t a . a n L i n d b e r g , v e e l a v a l d a m a t a . h t t p : / / e c . e u r o p a . e u / e nfft e r p r i s e / t r i s / .
For example to reduce pollutant vehicle emissions, the discharge of harmful substances into water, or the use of certain types of packaging, etc.
eelkýige tûûtajate kaitse tagamiseks toodete kasutamisel, eelda-des, et need meetmed ei avalda mýju toodetele.
These agreements allow greater ‹exibilityinimplementingthemeasures necessary to attain the objectives of the legislation, and the voluntary participation of the industry involved en-sures that they will be achieved.
See sête tugevdab juba kêesoleva artikli lýigetes 3 ja 4 vêljen-datud ideed, et hýlmatud on need tehnilised spetsi«katsioo-nid, mis mýjutavad toote omadusi.
which can reasonably be made of the product concerned oth-er than a purely marginal one.
II p e a t Ÿ k k : teavitamine seoses standarditega
The procedure for the provision of information laid down by the Directive in the field of technical regulations pro-vides that, on completion of the examination of drafts which it has been sent, the Commission and the Member States can request the regulatory authority to amend any text which is considered to be contrary to the rules of the inter-nal market.
Reeglina lisatakse Euroopa standardi tekst têispikkuses rahvus-likesse standarditesse. Rahvuslike standardite harmoneerimine on saavutatud siis, kui Ÿhe liikmesriigi rahvuslikele standardite-le vastavalt valmistatud tooteid výib neid muutmata kêsitleda vastavana teise liikmesriigi rahvuslikele standarditele.
Unless they can be ju s t i « e d u n d e r A r t i c l e 3 0 or Article 46 of the Treaty or proportionate in relation to es-sential requirements within the terms of the case law of the Court of Justice, they constitute barriers par excellence to the free movement of goods and services and to the freedom of establishment within the Community.
Komisjoni ja standardiorganisatsioonide teavitamine uutest objektidest rahvuslikes standardimisprogrammides
It is a matter for each Member State to decide, in accordance with the nature of its legislative process, the stage at which its draft technical regulations should be sent to the Commission, as long as it is still possible to make substantial amendments.
Samavêêrne Ÿlevýtmine têhendab seda, et rahvusliku stan-dardi tekstis on Euroopa baasstandardiga výrreldes teatavad tehnilise sisuga erinevused, mis ei tekita pýhimýtteliselt týkkeid kaupade vabale liikumisele ning mida rahvuslikul standardiorganisatsioonil on ýigus mêêratud Ÿleminekuaja lýpuni sêilitada.
The same procedure shall be used for amending this list;
Standarditest teavitamist hakati tegelikult kasutama 1. jaanua-ril 1985.
The list of authorities referred to in this paragraph is published on the Internet Site of the Commission.
Seoses uute standardimisalgatustega CENi ja CENELECi vastu-tusalades vastutavad need kaks Euroopa standardiorganisat-siooni korra tehnilise toimimise eest komisjoni výi EFTA sekre-tariaadiga sýlmitavate aastaste lepingute abil.
In that regard, it must be observed that a national measure which reproduces or replaces, without adding new or addition-al speci«cations,existingtechnicalregulationswhich,ifadopt-ed after the entry into force of Directive 83/189/EEC, have been duly n o t i « e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n , c a n n o t b e r effg a r d e d a s a ` d r a ft ' t e c h n i c a l regulation within the meaning of Article 1(12) of Di-rective 98/34/EC and consequently, as subject to the obligation to notify.
Artikkel 2 sêtestab, et standarditest teavitamine on piiratud rahvuslike standardiorganisatsioonide plaanitava uue tûûga selle lisamise ajal standardimisprogrammi, teiste sýnadega pii-savalt varajases etapis, mis výimaldaks liikmesriikide huvitatud sektoritel osaleda ning arvestada nende mêrkusi.
12) `draft technical regulation', the text of a technical speci«cationorother requirement or of a rule on services, including administrative provisions, formulated with the aim of enacting it or of ultimately having it enacted as a technical regulation, the text being at a stage of preparation at which substantial amendments can still be made.
Sellistest uutest algatustest tuleb teavitada direktiivi 98/34/Eâ alusel, sýltumata sellest, kas nende eesmêrk on uue standardi loomine výi olemasoleva standardi muutmine › aga ainult ju-hul, kui kavandatud standard ei teki rahvusvahelise výi Euroo-pa standardi ¶identse výi samavêêrse• Ÿlevýtmisega.
This Directive shall not apply to those measures Member States consider necessary under the Treaty for the protection of persons, in particular workers, when products are used, provided that such measures do not a.ecttheproducts.
Alates 1992. aastast on komisjon lisanud nendesse lepingutes-se kaks klauslit teabe kvaliteedi kohta, mille kohaselt CEN ja CENELEC kohustuvad esiteks mêêratlema selgelt teatamise têpsuse, selguse ja usaldusvêêrsuse tagamiseks vajalikud sise-eeskirjad ning teiseks varustama nende vastavad kesksekreta-riaadid vastuvýetava teabe kvaliteedi jêlgimiseks vajalike res-surssidega.
This paragraph de«nestheconceptof`drafttechnicalregula-tion': in order to be considered a draft, the technical regulation must be at a stage of preparation which will enable `substantial amendments' to be made to the text.
Rahvusvaheli-ne výi Euroopa standard ei tohiks pýhimýtteliselt ohustada kaupade vaba liikumist Euroopa âhenduses, sest selle tehnilis-te spetsi«katsioonideosasonsaavutatudkonsensuspaljusuu-remas ulatuses kui Ÿhe riigi piirid.
This provision reinforces a concept already expressed in para-graphs (3) and (4) of the Article, to the e.ectthattechnicalspeci«cationswhicha.ectthecharacteristicsoftheproductare covered.
Identne Ÿlevýtmine têhendab seda, et rahvuslik standard sisal-dab rahvusvahelise výi Euroopa standardi teksti výi viitab selle-le têiel mêêral.
Case C-267/03 `Lars Erik S t a . a n L i n d b e r g ' , judgment of 21 April 2005, not yet published.http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/
Tulemused salvestatakse sek-torite jêrgi perioodilisse registrisse (CENile igakuiselt ja CENELECile kvartaalselt), mis saadetakse lêbivaatamiseks ja mêrkuste esitamiseks CENi ja CENELECi liikmetele ja komisjoni asjakohastele osakondadele (ettevýtluse ja tûûstuse peadirek-toraat).
The inclusion in extenso of the European standard in sets of na-tional standards is usually the rule.
› rahvusvahelise, kuid mitte samavêêrse standardi Ÿlevýtmise-ga,
The harmonisation of na-tional standards is achieved when products manufactured in accordance with national standards of one Member State may be considered to comply, without modi«cation,withthena-tional standards of the other Member States.
On vêga têhtis, et tûûstus ja kýik huvitatud pooled oleksid sel-lest vahendist teadlikud ja omaksid sellele teabele juurdepêê-su, mis výimaldaks neil teha jêrgmist:
The Commission and the standardisation bodies referred to in Annexes I and II shall be informed of the new subjects for which the national bodies referred to in Annex II have decided, by includ-ing them in their standards programme, to prepare or amend a standard, unless it is an identical or equivalent transposition of an international or European standard.
Kolm loetletud standardite kategooriat hýlmavad tegelikult standardeid, mis ei vasta ¶rah-vusvahelise standardi identsele výi samavêêrsele Ÿlevýtmisele• ning millest tuleb seega teatada direktiivi 98/34/Eâ alusel.
Equivalent transposition means that the text of the national standard contains certain di.erences,ofatechnicalnature,compared with the European reference standard, which will not in principle create barriers to the free movement of goods, and which the national standardisation body can be author-ised to retain during a speci«edtransitionperiod.
Selle eelduseks on, et rahvuslikud standardiorganisatsioonid konsulteerivad tûûstusega, levitades registrit výimalikult laial-daselt, eelkýige teabele kerget juurdepêêsu výimaldavate edastusvahendite abil.
In practice, the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandardsbeganon1January1985.
Oluline on rýhutada, et huvitatud pooltel ja eelkýige tûûstusel on výimalik reaalselt reageerida suhteliselt l Ÿ h i k e s e s ajavahe-mikus.
Article 2 stipulates that the procedure for the provision of infor-mation in the «eldofstandardsislimitedtonewworkwhichthe national standardisation bodies are planning to initiate, at the time of its inclusion in the standards programme, in other words at a su/cientlyearlystagetoenableinterestedsectorsin the various Member States to take part and their comments to be taken into account.
› Rahvusvahelise standardi (ISO výi IEC) Ÿlevýtmisega loodud rahvuslik standard výib originaaldokumendist erineda, sest Ÿlevýtmine ei ole sellisena kohustuslik ning kuna rahvusli-kud standardiorganisatsioonid výivad neid muuta, kui nad leiavad, et tehnilised spetsi«katsioonideiolenendeturulas-jakohased. Sellisel juhul on soovitatav hinnata Ÿlevýetud standardi tehnilist spetsi«katsioonirahvusvaheliseststan-dardist erineva osa suhtes.
With regard to new standardisation initiatives in the areas of responsibility of CEN and CENELEC, the two European stand-ardisation bodies are responsible for the technical operation of the procedure by means of annual contracts concluded with the Commission and the EFTA Secretariat.
Tegelikkuses on ETSI osale-mine piiratud CENi ja CENELECi liikmete poolt esitatud ja nen-de kahe standardiorganisatsiooni peasekretariaatide poolt edastatud andmete vastuvýtmise ja hindamisega, sest tele-kommunikatsiooni valdkonnas on rahvuslik standardimistege-vus vêga piiratud.
These new initiatives must be communicated under Directive 98/34/EC, whether their objective is to establish a new stand-ard or amend an existing standard - but only if the envisaged standard does not arise from the `identical or equivalent' trans-position of an international or European standard.
CENELECi kesksekretariaatide vahendusel), nagu see oli algselt sêtestatud direktiivis 83/189/EMâ, vaid nad peavad esitama oma standardimisprogrammid têielikult výi osaliselt komisjoni taotluse korral.
Since 1992, the Commission has included two clauses in these contracts regarding the quality of the information, according to which CEN and CENELEC undertake, «rstly,tode«neclearlythe internal rules necessary to ensure the accuracy, clarity and reliability of the noti«cationsand,secondly,toequiptheirre-spective central secretariats with the resources necessary for monitoring the quality of the information received.
Kui sellise kontrollimise kêigus rahvuslikud standardiorganisat-sioonid, Euroopa standardiorganisatsioonid ja komisjon leia-vad, et kavandatav muudatus vêêrib uue uurimisobjekti loo-mist Euroopa tasandil, výivad nad teha ettepaneku uue Euroopa standardi koostamiseks.
The information is communicated by the national standardisa-tion bodies on a daily basis to the central secretariats of the two European bodies, where it is checked, processed and stored in a database.
Standardimise valdkonnas on direktiivi 98/34/Eâ eesmêrk ta-gada rahvuslike algatuste lêbipaistvus, kuid sellel on oma osa ka Euroopa standardimise arengu soodustamisel.
The results are then recorded, sector by sector, in a
Ajakohastamise eest vastutavad liikmesriigid, kes peavad esitavad komisjonile vajaliku teabe.
An international or European standard should not, in principle, jeopardise the free movement of goods within the European Community, since its technical speci«ca-tions have been the subject of consensus on a much larger scale than the limits of national boundaries.
Standardikavandite esitamine Euroopa ja rahvuslikele stan-dardiorganisatsioonidele ja komisjonile
and evaluation of data provided by the members of CEN and CENELEC and forwarded by the central secretariats of these two bodies, the reason being that national standardisation ac-tivity in the «eldoftelecommunicationsisextremelylimited.
asutus teavitab neid eelnýude kohta tehtud mêrkuste pýhjal výe-tud meetmetest.
periodical register (monthly for CEN and quarterly for CENELEC) which is distributed to the members of CEN and CENELEC, in addition to the relevant departments of the Commission (Di-rectorate-General for Enterprise and Industry) for examination and comments.
tema standardiorganisatsioon teatab týepoolest kýikidest uutest standardimisobjektidest nende lisamisel aastasesse tûû-programmi, esitab kýik teiste liikmesriikide standardiorgani-satsioonide, Euroopa standardiorganisatsiooni výi komisjoni poolt nýutud standardikavandid ning teavitab neid standardi-kavandi kohastest mêrkustest lêhtuvatest tegevustest.
The publication of this register and its distribution on a nation-al level, is a guarantee of the transparency of the information communicated under the 98/34/EC procedure.
Direktiivis 98/34/Eâ on sêtestatud, et pêrast nende teavitamist uutest standardimisalgatustest liikmesriikides on rahvuslikel standardiorganisatsioonidel, Euroopa standardiorganisatsioo-nidel ja komisjonil ýigus nýuda liikmesriigi standardiorganisat-sioonilt mis tahes tema poolt teatatud standardikavandi teksti saatmist.
› will transpose an international standard without being the equivalent,
Viimane peab sellise nýudmise rahuldama.
It is essential that industry and all interested parties know of this instrument and have access to the information in order to be able to exercise the following options open to them:
Samuti on nýutav kýikide Ÿhe sellise eelnýu kohta mêrkusi tei-nud poolte teavitamine jêrgnenud tegevustest: kas eelnýu muutmine, eelnýu tagasivýtmine výi selle kinnitamise pýhjen-damine.
› will amend a national standard.
Liikmesriigi pêdevusse kuuluvad meetmed
› to apply to take part in the work of the relevant technical committee of a standardisation body in another Member State (for example, a French company could apply to partici-pate in the German committee).
Vastavalt sellele punktile peab iga liikmesriik tagama, et tema standardiorganisatsioon annab pooltele kogu liidus výimaluse mêrkuste esitamiseks rahvuslike standardikavandite kohta.
The obligation on the national standardisation bodies to pro-vide details of the nature of the new draft standard has the ob-jective of ensuring transparency and facilitating the examina-tion of noti«cations.Itarisesdirectlyfromtheprecedingparagraph.
Sel-leks laiendatakse teistele liikmesriikidele a r v a m u s k Ÿ s i t l u s , mis on rahvuslikul tasandil vêga têhtis etapp standardi koostamise protsessi lýpuosas enne valideerimist ja lýpliku teksti avalda-mist.
The three categories of standards listed are in fact those which do not correspond to the `identical or equivalent transposition of an international standard' and must conse-quently be n o t i « e d u n d e r D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C .
See ametlik konsulteerimine kýikide sotsiaalmajanduslike ettevýtetega výimaldab rahvuslikel standardiorganisatsiooni-del veenduda têielikus konsensuses teksti suhtes.