natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For many it was the «rsttimetheyhad information on the issue of violence against children.
Paljud said esimest korda teavet las-tevastase vêgivalla kohta.
There has been a broad dissemination of the SOS helpline.
SOS usaldustelefoni levitati laialdaselt.
In the pilot phase, there were six cases of abuse revealed in « v e a r e a s o f T h e s - s a l o n i k i .
Algfaasis tuli ilmsiks kuus vêêr-kohtlemise juhtumit viies Thessalonóki piirkonnas.
The impact `Improved access to assistance' covers cases in which end-bene«ciariesreachmembers of the target groups better (also linked to the fact that target groups are more ac-cessible and more able to identify cases of violence) or are more able to access assistance (they know better who to call).
Mýju ¶Parem juurdepêês abileƒ alla kuuluvad juhtumid, kus lýppabisaajatel on sihtgruppi-deni jýuda lihtsam (see on samuti seotud faktiga, et sihtgrupid on ligipêêsetavamad ja suuda-vad paremini vêgivallajuhtumeid êra tunda) výi on nad enam výimelised abi otsima (teavad, kuhu helistada).
Such an impact is more frequent in projects coordinated by an NGO than in projects coordinated by any other type of organisation: 67 % compared with 39 % respectively.
Sellist mýju kohtab sagedamini MTâde poolt koordineeritud projektide puhul, výrreldes teist t Ÿ Ÿ p i organisatsioonidega (vastavalt 67% ja 39%).
In fact, NGOs play an important role in guiding end-bene«ciariestowardsade-quate assistance services and in interfacing with providers of services and end-bene«ciar-ies.
Tegelikult on MTâdel têhtis roll lýppabisaajate juhatamises adekvaatse abiteenuseni ning abisaajate ja teenusepak-kujate vahelises suhtluses.
The impact `Improved means of tackling their situations' refers to the case when a potential victim is better positioned to address his/her own situation. Such better position is due to:
Mýju ¶Paremad výimalused oma olukorraga toimetulekuksƒ viitab juhtumitele, kus potent-siaalsel ohvril on parem lêhteasend oma olukorraga tegelemiseks, mis tuleneb:
‡ better tools, e.g. a contact telephone number;
‡ parematest vahenditest, nt kontakttelefoni number;
‡ better knowledge: they understand their situation and know other people who are in the same situation;
‡ parematest teadmistest: nad mýistavad oma olukorda ja teavad teisi inimesi, kes on samas olukorras;
‡ increased con«dence:theyhavethecon«dencetoaddresstheirproblem.
‡ suurenenud enesekindlusest: neil on julgust probleemiga tegelemiseks.
Some illustrative cases are given below.
Jêrgnevalt on toodud mýned nêitlikud juhtumid:
We put a special search tool on the website to encourage people to get information on a low-key basis, without having to talk to anyone.
Panime v e e b i l e h e k Ÿ l j e l e spetsiaalse otsingutûûriista, et inimestel oleks výimalus teavet saada kon«dentsiaalselt,ilmakellegagirêêkimata.
There's a joined-up approach to people who have su.eredfromabuse.Theynowgetthesameservice from the national health service and police and each understands what the other is doing.
Vêgivalla all kannatanute puhul rakendatakse uut, koordineeritud lêhenemisviisi: n Ÿ Ÿ d saavad nad samu teenuseid nii riiklikult tervisetalituselt kui politseilt.
There is an increase of services in the region and these are integrated services to families.
Piirkondlikul tasemel on teenuste arv kasvanud ning need on tehtud perekeskseks.
This began in 2000 with one headquarters and now there are several.
See algas 2000. aastal Ÿhe peakorteriga › n Ÿ Ÿ d s e k s on neid mitu.
A national organisation has been founded: the Broken Rainbow, where counselling services are available for lesbians.
Loodi riiklik organisatsioon Broken Rainbow, mis pakub nýustamisteenust lesbilistele naistele.
The impact on end-bene«ciariesismoreindirectthantheimpactontargetgroups,becausethey are less involved in the process.
Mýju lýppabisaajatele on kaudsem kui sihtgruppidele, sest nemad on protsessi vêhem kaasa-tud.
End-bene«ciariesarerecipientsofthecareandservicesof the partners and target groups.
Lýppabisaajatele on suunatud partnerite ja sihtgruppide hool ning abiteenused.
They bene«tthroughtheirenhancedunderstanding,ca-pacity, performance and cooperation.
Nemad saavad kasu parema mýistmise, výimete, esituse ja koostûû nêol.
The more the representatives of target groups are lead-ers, the larger the expected impact.
Mida rohkem on juhtidest sihtgruppide esindajaid, seda suurem on oodatav mýju.
In fact, some projects were successful in reaching com-munity leaders (e.g. FGM stakeholders) or decision-makers (e.g. trade unions) and registered substantial impact on end-bene«ciariesasillustratedbelow.
Mýnel projektil ýnnestus jýuda Ÿhis-konna juhtide (nt FGMi aktsionêrid) výi otsusetegijateni (nt a m e t i Ÿ h i n g u d ) ning têheldati suurt mýju lýppabisaajatele, nagu on kirjeldatud alljêrgnevas nêites:
The project was explained in general meetings of the CCOO trade union in Spain so that sexual harassment has formed part of union negotiations and agreements.
Projekti seletati Hispaania CCOO a m e t i Ÿ h i n g u Ÿldkoosolekul nii, et seksuaalne tagakiusamine on n Ÿ Ÿ d osa a m e t i Ÿ h i n g u lêbirêêkimistest ja kokkulepetest.
Workers now get a good service and union representatives now have negotiated clauses to support prevention from sexual harassment.
Tûûlised saavad hea teeninduse ja a m e t i Ÿ h i n g u t e esindajad peavad lêbirêêkimisi seksuaalse tagakiusamise vastu.
During the project, partners discussed four times with the head of the police of the city of Frank-furt.
Projekti jooksul olid partneritel neljal korral arutelud Frankfurdi linna politseijýududega.
The aim was to change the attitude of police and see hate crimes against lesbian women as a phenomenon they have to deal with.
Ees-mêrgiks oli muuta politsei suhtumist: vaadata lesbiliste naiste vastastele kuritegudele kui nêh-tusele, millega tuleb tegelda.
As a result, the Frankfurt police has been trained.
Lýpptulemusena on Frankfurdi politseijýud lêbinud vastava koo-lituse.
Factors of impact on end-bene«ciaries(N = 113 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
(N = 113 projekti, mis on maininud kuni kolme positiivset výi negatiivset mýjufaktorit)
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 44 %
Projekti partnerite asjatundlikkuse ning nende têiendatavuse tase: 44%
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 5 %
Levitamistegevuste ýigeaegsus: 5%
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:39%
Kasutajate/lýppabisaaajate kaasatuse tase: 4%
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:4%
Kasutajate/abisaajate kaasatuse aste: 39%
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 35 %
Projekti eesmêrkide vastavus kontekstile: 35%
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 3 %
Sihtgruppide esindajate kaasatuse aste: 3%
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 33 %
Sihtgruppide esindajate kaasatuse aste: 33%
Synergies with other projects and/or other initiatives: 2 %
SŸnergiad teiste projektide ja/výi algatustega: 2%
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 19 %
Partnerluse rahvusvahelisuse aste: 19%
Resources/means allocated to the project: 17 %
Projektile eraldatud ressursid/vahendid: 17%
Other (limited access to schools): 1 %
Muud (piiratud ligipêês koolidele): 1%
Political interest/visibility: 14 %
Poliitiline huvi/nêhtavus: 14%
Synergies with other projects and/or other initiatives (EU, national, regional, local): 6 %
SŸnergiad teiste projektide ning algatustega (ELi, riiklikul, piirkondlikul ja kohalikul tasemel): 6%
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 3 %
Levitamistegevuste ýigeaegsus: 3%
Other (lobbying, appropriate and personalised methodological approach): 2 %
Muu (reklaamitûû, sobiv ning personaliseeritud metodoloogiline lêhenemine): 2%
The main factors contributing to these impacts are the quality of the outputs (54 % of the projects with impact), the level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners (44 %), the degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries(39%),theadequacyoftheprojectobjectives to the context (35 %) and the degree of involvement of representatives of target groups (33 %).
Peamised positiivsed mýjufaktorid on vêljundite kvaliteet (54% mýjudega projektidest), pro-jekti partnerite asjatundlikkuse ning nende têiendatavuse tase (44%), kasutajate/abisaajate kaasatavuse aste (39%), projekti eesmêrkide vastavus kontekstile (35%) ning sihtgruppide esindajate kaasatuse aste (33%).
The importance of the factors `involvement of end-bene«ciaries'and`involvementoftargetgroups' shows again the need to involve them in the project from the start.
¶Lýppabisaajate kaasatuseƒ ja ¶Sihtgruppide kaasatuseƒ faktorite têhtsus viitab taas vajadu-sele kaasata neid projekti kohe algusest peale.
In fact, the close involvement of target groups and end-bene«ciariesthroughouttheprojectcontributestothe production of credible and valid outputs tailored to their needs and it favours the wide reception/acceptability of these outputs.
Tegelikult toetab sihtgruppide ja lýppabisaa-jate kaasamine kogu projekti vêltel just nende vajaduste rahuldamiseks kohaldatud vêljun-dite loomist ning soodustab nende vêljundite head vastuvýttu.
Such participation is also valuable in raising their awareness and in turn encouraging them to reach broader audiences.
Samuti on lýppabisaajate projektides osalemine vajalik selleks, et týsta nende teadlikkust ja julgustada neid omakorda pûûrduma laiema kuulajaskonna poole.
The joint participation of target groups and end-bene«ciariesisalsoimportantinordertofavour exchanges and understanding between them.
Sihtgruppide ja lýppabisaajate projektides osalemine on têhtis ka nende omavahelise mýist-mise ja kogemuste vahetamise soodustamiseks.
As for the impacts on target groups, the main limiting factors of impact are the limited level of resources/means allocated to the projects (10 % of projects with impacts) and the non-timeliness of dissemination activities (5 % of projects).
Rêêkides mýjudest sihtgruppidele, on peamisteks mýju piiravateks faktoriteks projektile eral-datud ressursside/vahendite nappus (10% mýju omavatest projektidest) ja levitustegevuse hilinemine (5% projektidest).
Impacts on legislation, policy and institutional behaviours
Mýju seadusandlusele, poliitikale ja institutsioonidele
It should be « r s t nffo t e d t h a t t h e p r i m a r y a i m o f D a p h n e i s nffo t t op r o po s e l e g i s l a t i v e mffe a s u r e s o r to change policies.
Kýigepealt tuleks mainida, et Daphne peaeesmêrk ei ole mitte seadusandlike meetmete výi poliitika muutmine.
However, as a side-e.ectduetothestrongcommitmentanddedicationof some organisations, some legislative or policy changes occurred.
Siiski on mýnede organisatsioonide tugeva p Ÿ h e n d u m i s e tulemusena ka seda ette tulnud.
This can be seen as a plus.
See tuleb vaid kasuks.
These impacts are:
Sellisteks mýjudeks on:
(N = 122 projects, up to three impacts per project)
(N = 122 projekti, kuni kolm mýju projekti kohta)
Emergence of local, regional, national publicly funded initiatives
Kohalike, piirkondlike ja riiklike omarahastamisega algatuste teke
Visibility/debate of violence in the public arena
Vêgivalla nêhtavus avalikkuse silmis ning selleteemaline arutelu
More openness to experiences from other countries/settings
Suurem avatus teiste riikide výi tegevuspaikade kogemustele
The most frequent impacts concern di.erentcategoriesofinstitutionsandconsistof`in-creased awareness of issues of violence', `visibility/debate of violence in the public arena' as well as `more openness to experiences from other countries/settings'.
Kýige sagedamini ilmnevad mýjud asutuste eri kategooriates, sisaldades jêrgmisi mýjusid: ¶Suurenenud teadlikkus vêgivalla temaatikast•, ¶Vêgivalla nêhtavus avalikkuse silmis ning sel-leteemaline aruteluƒ ning ¶Suurem avatus teiste riikide výi tegevuspaikade kogemusteleƒ.
Those impacts are main-ly attributable to the distribution of materials to local/regional/national authorities, ministries and/or Members of Parliament as well as to the participation of such organisations in confer-ences, workshops and/or seminars.
Need mýjud tulenevad enamasti materjalide levitamisest kohalike, piirkondlike ja riiklike výimukand-jate, ministrite ja/výi parlamendiliikmete seas ning ka selliste organisatsioonide osalemisest konverentsidel, seminaridel ja/výi ýpikodades.
They can be summarised by saying that Daphne contrib-uted to the recognition of some issues of violence and to feeding discussions on how to «ghtagainst violence.
Kokkuvýtlikult výib nende kohta ûelda, et tênu Daphne projektidele on suurenenud teadmised mýnede v ê g i v a l l a k Ÿ s i m u s t e kohta ning alguse saanud arutlusi vêgivalla vastu výitlemise teemal.
Several project coordinators also reported that their Daphne project gave them more visibility and credibility to convince authorities.
Mitmete projektikoordinaatorite andmeil suu-rendas Daphne projekt nende nêhtavust ja usutavust výimude veenmisel.
More tangible impacts are `emergence of publicly funded initiatives' and `legislative/regulatory changes'.
Kêegakatsutavamad mýjud on ¶Omarahastamisega algatuste tekeƒ ja ¶Seadusandlikud/regu-latiivsed muutusedƒ.
They obviously are less frequent due to their higher degree of di/cultyinbeingachieved.
Kuna need on raskemini saavutatavad, esineb neid ka sagedamini.
These impacts can be, for example, the creation of a committee to assess the situation and develop strategies, additional funding or a speci«cactionlaunchedbytheauthorities.Theyare more frequently observed in projects coordinated by an NGO (37 % of the projects with this impact) than in projects coordinated by any other organisation (16 %).
Sel-listeks mýjudeks on nêiteks olukorra hindamiseks ja strateegiate vêljatûûtamiseks komitee loomine, lisarahastamine výi spetsii«linevýimudepoolnetegevus.Neidonsagedaminitêhel-datud MTâde poolt koordineeritud projektide puhul (37% sellise mýjuga projekte) kui mýne muu organisatsiooni poolt koordineeritud projektide puhul (16%).
This poses question be-cause one would have expected that projects led by (local) public authorities would have had greater facilities to approach and reach the competent (national) authority.
See týstatab k Ÿ s i m u s e , sest výiks arvata, et kohalike ametivýimude juhitud projektidel on paremad výimalused kompe-tentsete riigivýimude têhelepanu saavutamiseks.
The most illustrative cases of `emergence of local, regional, national publicly funded initiatives' are:
Kýige nêitlikumad juhtumid ¶Kohalike, piirkondlike ja riiklike omarahastamisega algatuste tekkeƒ kohta:
‡ development of Caritas a n t i - t r a / c k i n g p r o j e c t i n I t a l y s po n s o r e d b y t h e E C S T OP I I f u n d i n g l i n e and its expansion in Spain and Romania, change of the Lithuanian national strategy on t r a / c k i n g , a n d r e c e p t i o nffo f U N a n d o t h e r E u r op e a n cffo u n t r y f u n d i n g b y a L a t v i a n N G O t offe x p a n d its work on tra/cking;
‡ Caritase inimkaubanduse vastane projekt Itaalias ning selle laienemine Hispaaniasse ja Ru-meeniasse, mida rahastas Euroopa Komisjoni STOP II fond, Leedu riikliku inimkaubanduse strateegia muutus ning â R O ja Euroopa riikide rahaline toetus Lêti MTâ-le, et see saaks laiendada oma inimkaubandusevastast tûûd.
‡ launch of national laboratories of violence against women in Belgium and Ireland;
‡ Riiklike naistevastase vêgivalla laborite avamine Belgias ja Iirimaal.
‡ creation of a new information/counselling service for victims of family violence at a police setting in Portugal;
‡ Uue teabe-/nýustamisteenuse loomine perevêgivalla ohvritele politseiasutuses Portu-galis.
‡ expansion of the training sessions addressing black and migrant groups on domestic violence from local level (in the Netherlands) to Birmingham and Ireland;
‡ Mustanahaliste ja migrantide gruppe kaasavate koduvêgivalla vastaste koolitusseansside laiendamine kohalikult tasandilt (Madalmaad) Birminghami ja Iirimaale.
‡ local authority (Equal Opportunity Commission) sponsorship of a campaign against violence on women; it is still collaborating;
‡ Kohalik výim (výrdsete výimaluste komisjon) rahastas naistevastase vêgivalla vastast kam-paaniat ning koostûû jêtkub.
‡ development of a treatment programme for all Internet sex o . e n d e r s i n t h e U K a s a r e s u l t o f a n Irish-led project;
‡ Kohtlemisprogrammi loomine kýigile âhendkuningriigi seksuaalkurjategijatele internetis Ÿhe Iirimaa projekti tulemusena.
‡ creation of a Forensic Nursing Committee in Ireland for women victims of rape;
‡ Kohtuliku hoolekandekomitee loomine Iirimaal naissoost vêgistamisohvritele.
‡ creation of a working group on sexual abuse by the Belgian Flemish authorities, which fund-ed a follow-up project;
‡ Belgia ‹aamivýimud lýid seksuaalse vêêrkohtlemisega tegeleva tûûgrupi ning rahastasid ka jêtkuprojekti.
‡ provision of further funding to project activities by the Regional Government of Linz (Ûst), previously uninterested in responses to tra/cking;
‡ Linzi (Austria) piirkondliku výimukandja poolne projekti tegevuste lisarahastamine, kuigi eelnevalt olid výimud olnud inimkaubanduse suhtes Ÿkskýiksed.
‡ establishment by the Portuguese government, in May 2000, of the national helpline for vic-tims of domestic violence;
‡ Riikliku usaldustelefoni loomine koduvêgivalla ohvritele Portugali valitsuse poolt 2000. aas-ta maikuus.
‡ creation within the partner `Regione Marche' (Italy) of a regional coordination table on pros-titution and tra/ckingwiththeparticipationoftheregionalauthoritiesandthefourprov-inces.
‡ Piirkondlike výimude ja nelja provintsi osalusega regionaalse prostitutsiooni ja inimkauban-duse vastase koordineerimiskeskuse loomine ¶Regione Marcheƒ poolt (Itaalia).
The impact `legislative/regulatory change' refers more to the promotion of the circumstances favouring legislative/regulatory change than to the change itself.
Mýju ¶Seadusandlik/regulatiivne muutusƒ viitab rohkem seadusandlikke/regulatiivseid muu-tusi pooldavate asjaolude soodustamisele kui tegelikule muutusele.
This promotion notably consists of feeding debates with the expertise, the data and the results obtained through the projects.
Asjaolude soodustamine têhendab peamiselt kogemuste, andmete ja projektitulemuste arutlustesse kaasamist.
Illustrative cases are:
Hea-deks nêideteks výib nimetada:
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e c r e a t i o nffo f a n e w S e x O . e n c e B i l l i n t h e U K ;
‡ Mýju uue seksuaalkuritegude alase eelnýu loomisele âhendkuningriigis.
‡ the Defensores del Pueblo in Spain have started to take on the idea of special courts for children with rapid judgments.
‡ Defensores del Pueblo Hispaanias on hakanud jêrgima ideed, et laste puhul peaks loodama spetsiaalsed kohtud kiirotsuste tegemiseks.
The Council of Europe published a book on sexual abuse with one chapter devoted to the project work;
Euroopa Nýukogult ilmus raamat seksuaalse vêêrkohtlemise kohta, mille Ÿks p e a t Ÿ k k on p Ÿ h e n d a t u d projekti tûûle.
‡ inclusion of `same-sex partnerships' in the German civil law on protecting victims of domes-tic violence;
‡ ¶Samasooliste partnerlusteƒ kaasamine Saksa tsiviilýiguses koduvêgivalla ohvrite kaitse teemadel.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o n i n 2 0 0 2 o f t h e n e w Cffo m mstu n i tffy A c t i o n 9 7 / 15 4 / J A I i nffo r d e r t o i n c l u d e a l l the forms of contemporary slavery;
‡ Mýju uue ¶Kogukonna tegevuskava 97/154/JAIƒ (2002) vastuvýtmisele, selleks et kaasata kýiki kaasaegse orjuse vorme.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o nffo f t h e n e w G e r m a n l a w G e w a l t s c hffu t z Gesetz on domestic violence according to which women can go to courts and apply for the o.enderstoleavetheabode;
‡ Mýju uue Saksa koduvêgivalla-alase seaduse ¶Gewaltschutz Gesetzƒ vastuvýtmisele, mille kohaselt saavad naised minna kohtusse ja taotleda r Ÿ n d a j a t e elukohast lahku-mist.
‡ adoption by the Danish government of violence indicators and implementation in national action plans for violence against women;
‡ Naistevastase vêgivallaga tegelemise riiklikes tegevusplaanides výeti Taani valitsuse poolt vastu vêgivalla indikaatorite rakendamine.
‡ elaboration and approval of the Italian Regulation Act for Article 18 of the Immigration Con-solidation Act which promoted a national integrated system of social assistance and integra-tion projects and a national free hotline for the victims of tra/cking;
‡ Itaalia immigratsiooni konsolideerimisseaduse muutmisseaduse artikli 18 vêljatûûtamine ja heakskiit. Mainitud seadus edendaks riiklikku sotsiaalabi- ja integratsiooniprojektide s Ÿ s t e e m i ning tasuta riikliku valvetelefoni loomist inimkaubanduse ohvritele.
‡ amendment to the UK Mental Health Act based on evidence from the project coordinator concerning the issue of consent for women with learning disabilities, derived from the expe-rience gained in this project;
‡ âhendkuningriigi vaimse tervise seaduse muudatus ýpiraskustega naiste nýusoleku kohta, mis pýhineb projekti koordinaatori týenditel ning tuleneb sellest projektist saadud kogemus-test.
‡ new procedures in Belgium to enable Roma children to continue their schooling despite their legal status in the country.
‡ Uus kord Belgias, mis výimaldab mustlaslastel kooliteed jêtkata, hoolimata nende ýiguslikust staatusest riigis.
The main factors contributing to these impacts on legislation/policy are the `quality of the outputs' (52 % of the projects with impact), the `level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners' (47 %), the `political interest/visibility' (32 %) and the `adequacy of the project objectives to the context' (25 %).
Peamised faktorid, mis aitavad kaasa nendele mýjudele seadusandlusele/poliitikale, on ¶vêl-jundite kvaliteetƒ (52% mýjuga projektidest), ¶projekti partnerite kogemuste ja têiendavuse taseƒ (47%), ¶poliitiline huvi/nêhtavusƒ (32%) ja ¶projekti eesmêrkide vastavus kontekstigaƒ (25%).
The factor `political interest/visibility' is also a limiting factor for 13 % of the projects.
Poliitilise huvi/nêhtavuse faktor on ka piiravaks faktoriks 13% projektidest.
Some project partners might have an in‹uenceonthede«nitionofpoliticalprioritiesandtheirim-plementation. In general, the emergence of political interest can be improved as follows:
Mýnedel partne-ritel výib olla mýju poliitiliste prioriteetide mêêratlemisele výi rakendamisele. âldiselt výib poliitilise huvi teket parandada jêrgmiselt:
‡ by producing valid and credible outputs with the aim of gaining public support that in turn generates political interest;
‡ luues kehtivaid ja usutavaid vêljundeid eesmêrgiga saada avalikkuse toetust, mis oma-korda tekitaks poliitilist huvi;
‡ by having close contacts with key decision-makers and policy-makers during the project or at least by disseminating the outputs to them.
‡ omades hêid sidemeid výtmeisikute ja poliitikakujundajatega projekti jooksul výi vêhemalt neid vêljundeist teavitades.
Following this impact assessment, the Daphne programme can be seen as successful in con-tinuing the mobilisation of the NGO sector at all levels, resulting in many new partnerships and alliances that are working together for more comprehensive European policies on vio-lence.
Seda mýjude hindamist arvestades výib mêrkida, et Daphne programm on edukas MTâ sektori mobiliseerimise jêtkamisel kýikidel tasemetel, mille tulemusena tekib palju uusi partnerlus- ja koostûûsuhteid, mis p Ÿ Ÿ d l e v a d pýhjalikuma vêgivallavastase poliitika poo-le Euroopas.
Good practices
Head tavad
In order to improve project selection and to maximise achievement and impact of the objec-tives, it is interesting to understand the factors of success and therefore the good practices developed by the successful projects.
Parandamaks projektide valikut ja suurendamaks eesmêrkide saavutamist ning mýju, on va-jalik mýista edu faktoreid ja seetýttu teada edukate projektide hêid tavasid.
In Annex 2, 15 projects that have developed good prac-tices are presented.
Lisas 2 on toodud 15 projekti vêljakujunenud heade tavadega.
The criteria used for the selection of these good practices are as follows:
Heade tavade valikukriteeriumid on jêrgmised: