natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Their added value for dissemination and generation of impact is, however, more questionable.
Konverentsid, seminarid ja ýpikojad on vajalikud juhul, kui nad jýuavad ka sihtgrupi liikmete ja lýppabisaajate výi poliitiliste výtmeisikuteni, nýnda suuremat mýjupinda saavutades.
‡ The resources required to organise such events are substantial, compared with other dis-semination activities such as dissemination through a website.‡ Dissemination mainly concerns the people attending.
‡ Enamikul juhtudel on konverentsid Ÿhekordsed Ÿritused ja nende lýppedes ei toimu min-git jêtkutegevust olukorra muutmise nimel.
They therefore conclude the project activities instead of being a link in the dissemination and impact chain.‡ They often take place at the end of the project, which is probably too late to have an impact.
‡ Tihti leiavad konverentsid aset projekti lýppedes, siis on aga mýjustamiseks juba liiga hilja.
In fact, having an impact on target groups, end-bene«ciariesandpublicauthoritiesimpliesengaging them earlier in the project.
Mýjutamaks sihtgruppe, lýppabisaajaid ja riigivýime, peaksid need toimuma projekti va-rasemas etapis.
Nevertheless, conferences, seminars and workshops allow contact with a larger audience than through «eldactionsorspeci«ctraining.Toreinforcetheconferencesasinstrumentsforfur-ther dissemination and impacts, it is suggested to:
Siiski on suurema rahvahulgaga kontakti výimalik saada pigem konverentside, seminaride ja ýpikodade kui valdkonnategevuse výi erialase koolitusega. Selleks, et konverentsid oleksid paremad vahendid projektide edasise mýju ja levitamistûû jaoks, soovitatakse:
‡ make sure key decision-makers and policy-makers are invited and do attend;
‡ teha kindlaks, et výtmeisikud poliitiliste ja muude têhtsate otsuste tegemisel oleksid kut-sutud ja kohal;
‡ carry out follow-up actions after the conference to keep the issue in the minds of the at-tendees.
‡ pêrast konverentsi teostada jêtkutegevusi, et antud teemat osalejate mýtteis edasi hoida.
Some projects were successful in reaching key people through events, as illustrated below.
Mýned projektid on Ÿrituste kaudu výtmeisikuteni jýudmises edu saavutanud, nagu výib lugeda jêrgmisest nêitest:
An expert meeting was organised at month 11 of the project. It brought together 50 European FGM stakeholders.
Projekti 11. kuul korraldati ekspertide kohtumine, mis týi kokku 50 Euroopa FGMi aktsionêri.
[It fostered the] development of a di.erentiatedandintegratedtrainingsystemaddressingplay-ers in a multi-disciplinary approach: social intervention bodies both from the public and the non-pro«tsector,law-enforcementagenciesandthejudicialsystem,playersinthelabourmar-ket, local political representatives.
Diferentseeritud ja integreeritud k o o l i t u s s Ÿ s t e e m i loomine kaasab multidistsiplinaarse lêhene-misega osalisi: sotsiaalse sekkumise organid nii avalikust kui mittetulundussektorist, ý i g u s k a i t - s e b Ÿ r o o d ja k o h t u s Ÿ s t e e m , tûûturg ning kohalikud výimuesindajad.
Such a di.erentiatedandintegratedtrainingsystemimprovedthe expertise of the di.erentplayersandde«nedgoodnetworkingstrategiesandpractices.
Sarnane diferentseeritud ja integreeritud k o o l i t u s s Ÿ s t e e m suurendas osaliste asjatundlikkust ning mêêratles head koostûûstrateegiad ja tavad.
Reaching target groups and end-bene«ciaries
Sihtgruppide ja lýppabisaajateni jýudmine
In addition to the distribution of materials and the organisation of events, 60 projects had close contacts with target groups and/or end-bene«ciaries.Suchcontactshavemainlybeenvisits and discussions with the members of target groups working with the end-bene«ciaries,with the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s a n d a l s o w i t h t a r g e t g r o up s nffo t w o r k i n g d i r e c t l y w i t h e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s s u c h a s n a t i o n a l a uijt h o r i t i e s , ju d i c i a l s t a . a n d Mffe m b e r s o f t h e E u r op e a n P a r l i a mffe n t .
Lisaks materjalide levitamisele ja s Ÿ n d m u s t e korraldamisele olid 60 projektil lêhikontaktid sihtgruppide ja/výi lýppabisaajatega. Suhtlemine toimus peamiselt k Ÿ l a s t u s t e ja arutluste nêol sihtgruppide liikmetega, kes tûûtavad lýppabisaajatega, lýppabisaajate eneste ja sel-liste sihtgrupi liikmetega, kes otseselt lýppabisaajatega ei tegele, nagu riigi- ja kohtuvýimud ning Euroopa Parlamendi liikmed.
For 49 projects, those contacts took place during the project.
49 projekti puhul toimus see suhtlemine projekti ajal. âheksa projekti puhul toimus suhtlus projekti ajal ja pêrast seda ning kahe projekti puhul pêrast projekti lýppemist.
For nine projects, they took place during and after the project and for two projects, they took place after completion of the project.
Lêhikontakt loodi jêrgmistes kategooriates:
Close contacts occurred within the following categories.
Sihtgrupid‡ Ýpetajad: 17 projekti
E n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s A . e c t e d w o mffe n : 9 p r o j e c t s Y o u n g people: 8 p r o j e c t s C h i l d r e n : 8 projects
‡ Politseijýud ja sotsiaaltûûtajad: kumbki 13 projekti mýlemal
Target groups‡ Teachers: 17 projects‡ Police and social workers: 13 projects each‡ Educational sta.(educators,parents):12projects
Lýppabisaajad‡ Naised: 9 projekti‡ Noored inimesed: 8 projekti‡ Lapsed: 8 projekti
‡ Local/national authorities, Members of Parliaments, deputies: 12 projects
‡ Kohalikud/riiklikud výimuesindajad, parlamendiliikmed, saadikud: 12 projekti
End-bene«ciariesingeneral:5 projects.
‡ Meditsiinitûûtajad, p s Ÿ h h o l o o g i d : 8 projekti‡ MTâd: 8 projekti
‡ Medical sta.,psychologists:8projects‡ NGOs: 8 projects‡ EU authorities, MEPs, politicians: 12 projects‡ Judicial sta.:4projects
‡ ELi výimud, Euroopa Parlamendi liikmed, poliitikud: 12 projekti
‡ Other: 14 projects (associations, charities, journalists, practitioners, volunteers, rapporteur for United Nations, experts, trade unions, employers' organisations, representatives of religious communities).
‡ Muud: 14 projekti (assotsiatsioonid, heategevusasutused, ajakirjanikud, harrastajad, vabatahtlikud, â R O aruandja, eksperdid, a m e t i Ÿ h i n g u d , tûûlisorganisatsioonid, usuliste ringkondade esindajad).
The European label helped some partners to get in close contact with political authorities, as illustrated below.
Euroopa mêrge výimaldas mýnedel partneritel poliitiliste výimudega lêhikontakti astuda, nagu nêha alljêrgnevas nêites:
Having the EU as a political backbone opened doors that had been closed for a long time.
Kui projektidel on ELi poliitiline toetus, avab see kaua lukus hoitud uksi.
Net-works working in those «eldstookthephenomenonofhatecrimesagainstlesbianwomenandof domestic violence more seriously.
Týsisemalt on vastava-tes valdkondades hakatud výtma selliseid nêhtusi nagu kodune vêgivald ja lesbiliste naiste vastased kuriteod.
Still it was di/culttoovercomethe`friendly'listeningandgetting them into action.
Siiski on raske olnud Ÿle saada nn sýbraliku êrakuulamise faasist ning tegu-deni jýuda.
However, «nallytheydidlisten.
Lýpuks on hakatud aga kuulda výtma.
Dissemination activities were mainly carried out during the project.
Levitustegevust viidi peamiselt lêbi projekti ajal.
Some 88 % of the project coordinators were keen to continue the project after its end but only 11 % received addi-tional funds for dissemination, as illustrated below.
Umbes 88% projekti koordinaatoritest soo-visid projekti jêtkamist pêrast selle lýppu, kuid ainult 11% said levitustûûks lisaressursse, nagu nêha alljêrgnevas nêites:
Grant from Leeds Health Action Zone Community for free dissemination of the video pack to all Leeds primary and secondary schools after the contractual period.
Abiraha Leeds Health Action Zone Community'lt videomaterjali tasuta levitamiseks kýikidele Leedsi alg- ja keskkoolidele pêrast lepingulise perioodi lýppu.
The Catholic Church funded the production of 2 000 copies of our report in book form.
Katoliku kirik rahastas meie aruande vêljaandmist 2000se tiraa™iga raamatu vormis.
Getting funds to continue the Daphne projects after closure is critical.
âlimalt têhtis on saada toetusi Daphne projektide jêtkamiseks pêrast nende lýppemist.
Daphne funding al-lowed great things to start but there is a general lack of possibilities for follow-up to ensure continuity of project activities as both the EC and local governments refuse to take them in charge.
Daph-ne rahastamine oli suureks alguseks, aga projektide jêtkusuutlikkus on nýrk, sest nii Euroopa Komisjon kui kohalikud výimud keelduvad vastutusest.
For example, updating a website with information at European level or maintaining a European network of local crisis centres takes time and money.
Nêiteks nýuab Ÿhe v e e b i l e h e k Ÿ l j e Euroopa tasemel teabega uuendamine výi Euroopa kohalike kriisikeskuste výrgustiku Ÿlalpi-damine aega ja raha.
Often, local governments refuse to fund such follow-up activity because it is not a local project.
Tihti keelduvad kohalikud výimud selliseid jêtkutegevusi rahastamast, kuna tegemist ei ole kohaliku projektiga.
On the EC side, Daphne is the only EC programme for such actions but it does not consider continuing to fund ex-penses linked to the updating of a website or the maintaining of a network.
Euroopa Komisjoni poolt on Daphne ainus prog-ramm selliste tegevuste jaoks, aga selles ei arvestata v e e b i l e h e k Ÿ l j e uuendamise výi výrgus-tiku alalhoidmisega seotud kulutuste katmise jêtkamist.
The results of the Daphne experience ing training modules for trainers on the prevention of violence in children's behaviour, elaborat-ing a research agenda for academics on female genital mutilation, and many others.
Daphne kogemuse tulemused âks huvitavamaid arenguid projektide puhul on uudsed ideed, mida rakendati mýne kriitilise teema puhul.
Some project methods were innovative, such as a pilot training module based on a drama workshop for the self-empowerment of girls and preventing sexual abuse, and a training resource pack to be used within the workplace to increase awareness of domestic violence.
Mýne pro-jekti puhul oli tegu uuendusliku metoodikaga, nagu nêitlemisýpikojal pýhinev pilootkoolitus t Ÿ t a r l a s t e enesekindluse týstmiseks ning seksuaalse vêêrkohtlemise êrahoidmiseks, samuti tûû-kohas kasutatav koolituskomplekt suurendamaks inimeste teadlikkust koduvêgivalla suhtes.
The multiplier ef-fects of new methodologies, multi-agency cooperation, training programmes, audiovisual and information technology materials and other outcomes/products of some of the projects are far-reaching and impressive.
Uute metoodikate, mitmete agentuuride koostûû, koolitusprogrammide, audiovisuaalsete ja infotehnoloogiliste materjalide ning muude vêljundite/toodete mýju on kaugeleulatuv ning muljetavaldav.
The «nalevaluationalsostudiedtheimpactsoftheprogramme.Theyarede«nedashumanand social changes brought about by Daphne or one of its projects.
Lýpliku hindamise kêigus uuriti ka programmi mýjusid, mida mêêratleti Daphne výi mýne selle projekti poolt esile kutsutud muutustena inimeses ja Ÿhiskonnas.
These impacts were measured along three axes: impacts on the partners, on the target groups and on the end-bene«ciaries.Furthermore,thefactorsa.ecting,positivelyornegatively,theseimpactswere identi«edinordertoimprovetheunderstandingofthemechanismsleadingtoimpact.
Neid mýjusid hinnati kolmel teljel: mýjud partneritele, sihtgruppidele ja lýppabisaajatele. Lisaks tuvastati faktorid, mis positiivselt výi negatiivselt neid mýjutasid, selleks et paremini mýista muutusi pýhjustavaid mehhanisme.
Impacts on partners
Mýjud koostûûpartneritele
The graph below presents the six categories of impact on partners as experienced by them.
Allpool toodud joonis nêitab kuut mýjukategooriat, mida on kogenud koostûûpartnerid.
(N = 143 projects, up to three impacts per project)
(N = 143 projekti, i g a Ÿ h e l kuni kolm mýju)
Improved expertise
Paranenud asjatundlikkus
Adoption of good practices
Paranenud týsiseltvýetavus ja haaratavus
Improved credibility and outreach
Paranenud koostûûvýime
Improved networking capacities
Ligipêês lisaressurssidele
Access to additional funding
Muutus tûû iseloomus
Nearly all the projects (97 %) have impacts on the partners.
Peaaegu kýik projektid (97%) on oma koostûûpartneritele mýju avaldanud.
`Improved expertise' is linked to gains in understanding or new understanding of the issue of vio-lence, learning from the experience of other partners and target groups, improved skills/perform-ance and increased knowledge of how an issue is addressed across Europe.
¶Paranenud asjatundlikkusƒ on seotud vêgivallateema paranenud výi uue arusaamaga, ýp-pides teiste partnerite ja sihtgruppide kogemustest, samuti uute oskuste ning teadmistega, kuidas mingit teemat Ÿle kogu Euroopa kêsitletakse.
Improved expertise must be linked to the transnational character of the partnerships, allowing partners to work and exchange knowledge with complementary partners with a high level of expertise.
Paranenud asjatundlikkus tuleneb part-nerluse rahvusvahelisusest, mille týttu partnerid saavad omavahel teadmisi vahetada ja tûûta-da kýrgel tasemel.
For 76 % of the partners, it was the « r s t t i mffe t h e y p a r t i c i p a t e d i n a D a p h n e p r o j e c t : t h i s i s a h i g hp e r c e n t a g e o f ` n e w cffo mffe r s ' , illustrating the pioneering role of Daphne for the partners concerned.
76% partneritest osales Daphne projektis esmakordselt: see uustulnukate kýrge osakaal kirjeldab hêsti Daphne teedrajavat rolli.
`Adoption of good practices' refers to cases where, due to the project, partners acted di.er-ently in their work, became more professional and adapted good practices to their own use.
¶Paranenud koostûûvýimeƒ viitab kolmele výimalikule olukorrale:
`Change of the nature of work' refers typically to projects with a research component, where the results of the project overturn the previous conception of work.
‡ projektijêrgselt on partneritevaheline koostûû týenêolisem ja kergemini saavutatav.
After the project, partners operate di.erentlyduetonewinformationandunderstandingcomingfromtheproject.
¶Heade tavade omandamineƒ viitab juhtumitele, kus projekt parandas partnerite tûûkêitumist, suurendas professionaalsust ning pakkus kasulikke hêid tavasid.
Factors of impact on the partners(N = 137 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
(N = 137 projekti, mis on maininud kuni kolme soodustavat výi piiravat mýjufaktorit)
Contributing factors
Soodustavad faktorid
Limiting factors
Piiravad faktorid
Resources/means allocated to the project: 10 %
Projektile eraldatud ressursid/vahendid: 10%
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 69 %
Projekti partnerite asjatundlikkuse ja têiendatavuse tase: 69%
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 4 %
Partnerluse rahvusvahelisuse tase: 49%
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 49 %
Projekti partnerite asjatundlikkuse ja têiendatavuse tase: 4%
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 3 %
Levitustegevuse ýigeaegsus: 3%
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 31 %
Projekti eesmêrkide vastavus kontekstile: 31%
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 1 %
Partnerluse rahvusvahelisuse tase: 1%
Resources/means allocated to the project: 24 %
Projektile eraldatud ressursid/vahendid: 24%
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:1%
Kasutajate/abisaajate kaasatuse tase: 1%
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 1 %
SŸnergiad teiste projektide ja/výi algatustega: 1%
Political interest/visibility: 1 %
Poliitiline huvi/nêhtavus: 1%
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:15%
Kasutajate/abisaajate kaasatuse tase: 15%
Political interest/visibility: 12 %
Poliitiline huvi/nêhtavus: 12%Levitustegevuse ýigeaegsus: 7%
Other (project duration; for small NGOs, constraints linked to a European project): 1 %
Muud (projekti kestvus; vêikeste MTâde puhul Euroopa projektidega seotud kitsendused): 1%
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 7 %
SŸnergiad teiste projektide ja/výi algatustega: 7%
The «rsttwocontributingfactorsclearlyemphasisetheneedforacarefullydesignedpartner-ship.
Kaks esimest soodustavat faktorit rýhutavad selgelt vajadust hoolikalt planeeritud partner-luse jêrele.
This is con«rmedbytheimportancegiventothelevelofexpertiseofthesepartnersalsoin the limiting factors.
Seda kinnitab ka piiravates faktorites êra toodud partnerite asjatundlikkuse taseme têhtsus.
Therefore this point seems crucial and will be regularly recalled by the Commission in its guidelines: good partnership with appropriate expertise favours the project's achievements but an ill-designed partnership penalises it.
Seega on antud k Ÿ s i m u s mêêrava têhtsusega ja seda mainitakse regulaarselt Euroopa Komisjoni suunistes: hea partnerlus sobiva asjatundlikkusega soodustab projekti saavutusi, halvasti planeeritud partnerlus mýjub saavutustele negatiivselt.
In addition, 10 % of the quotations for limiting factors mention quite logically that the resources allocated to the project are important.
Lisaks sellele on 10% piira-vate faktorite noteeringutes Ÿsna loogiliselt mainitud, et projektile eraldatud ressursid on têhtsad.
Impacts on target groups
Mýjud sihtgruppidele
A total of 93 % of the projects present an impact on the target groups.
93% projektidest omavad mýju sihtgruppidele.
(N = 137 projects, up to three impacts per project)
(N = 137 projekti, kuni kolm mýju projekti kohta)
Increased awareness of issues of violence
Suurenenud teadlikkus vêgivalla k Ÿ s i m u s t e s
Changed behaviour regarding prevention of violence
Suurenenud asjatundlikkus
Changed behaviour regarding protection from violence
Muutus kêitumises seoses vêgivalla ennetamisega
More openness to practices from other countries/organisations
Muutus kêitumises seoses kaitsega vêgivalla eest
Increased knowledge of legislative framework
Paremad teadmised seadusandlikust raamistikust
`Increased awareness of issues of violence' results from proper dissemination activities (ma-terials distributed and events organised) towards members of the target groups.
¶Suurenenud teadlikkus vêgivalla k Ÿ s i m u s t e s ƒ tuleneb korralikust levitamistegevusest (levi-tatud materjalid ja korraldatud Ÿritused) teiste sihtgrupi liikmete seas.
The impact `more willingness/capacity to cooperate' refers to a better implementation of the outputs of the project because the target groups:
Mýju ¶Paranenud koostûûvalmidusƒ viitab projektivêljundite paremale rakendamisele, sest sihtgrupid:
‡ are more interested in working together;
‡ on koostûûst rohkem huvitatud;
‡ are more able to work together;
‡ on koostûûks enam valmis;
‡ understand each other better.
‡ mýistavad Ÿksteist paremini.
The impact `increased expertise' refers to a better understanding or a new understanding of the issue of violence, exchange of experience and practices with partners and other target groups leading to a more integrated approach on the issue of violence and to an increased knowledge of activities in the sector across Europe.
Mýju ¶Suurenenud asjatundlikkusƒ viitab paranenud výi uuele arusaamale v ê g i v a l l a k Ÿ s i m u - s e s t , kusjuures kogemuste ja tavade vahetamine partnerite ning teiste sihtgruppidega viib kompaktsema lêhenemise ja suurenenud teadlikkuseni Ÿle Euroopa antud sektoris toimu-vast.
`Changed behaviour regarding prevention from violence' mostly corresponds to an intention to better focus on actions of prevention, in two ways:
¶Muutus kêitumises seoses vêgivalla ennetamisegaƒ on vastavuses peamiselt kavatsusega paremini keskenduda ennetustegevustele kahel viisil:
‡ target groups do more preventing actions than before;
‡ sihtgrupid teevad rohkem ennetustûûd;
‡ target groups have changed their way of working because they know the problem better and are consequently more able to address it.
‡ sihtgrupid on muutnud oma tûûtamisviisi, sest nad mýistavad probleemi paremini ja on seega enam valmis sellega tegelema.
The drive is more focused on prevention.
Suurem têhelepanu on pûûratud ennetusele.
They use preventing instead of reporting, counselling or use of social circles.
Enne-tust kasutatakse aruandmise, nýustamise výi sotsiaalsete ringkondade asemel.
This is typi-cally the case of projects with a research component that has allowed a deeper understand-ing of prevention.
Nii on ta-valiselt uurimistûûd sisaldavate projektidega, mis on kujundanud s Ÿ g a v a m a arusaama en-netusest.
Factors of impact on target groups(N = 133 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
(N = 133 projekti, milles on mainitud kuni kolme soodustavat výi piiravat mýjufaktorit)
Resources/means allocated to the project: 13 %
Projektile eraldatud ressursid/vahendid: 13%
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 50 %
Projekti partnerite asjatundlikkuse ning nende têiendatavuse tase: 50%
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 8 %
Levitamistegevuste ýigeaegsus: 8%
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 34 %
Sihtgruppide esindajate kaasatuse aste: 34%
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 4 %
Sihtgruppide esindajate kaasatuse aste: 4%
Political interest/visibility: 3 %
Poliitiline huvi/nêhtavus: 3%
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 32 %
Projekti eesmêrkide vastavus kontekstile: 32%
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:2%
Kasutajate/abisaajate kaasatuse aste: 2%
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 26 %
Partnerluse rahvusvahelisuse aste: 26%
Resources/means allocated to the project: 25 %
Projektile eraldatud ressursid/vahendid: 25%
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 1 %
Projekti partnerite asjatundlikkuse ning nende têiendatavuse tase: 1%
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:21%
Kasutajate/abisaajate kaasatuse aste: 21%
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 1 %
Partnerluse rahvusvahelisuse aste: 1%
Political interest/visibility: 20 %
Poliitiline huvi/nêhtavus: 20%
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 1 %
Projekti eesmêrkide vastavus kontekstiga: 1%
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 6 %
Levitamistegevuste ýigeaegsus: 6%
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 4 %
SŸnergiad teiste projektide ning algatustega: 4%
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 1 %
SŸnergiad teiste projektide ning algatustega: 1%
Other (new topic of great interest): 1 %
Muud (uus huvitav teema): 1%
Here again, there is an important factor that can both favour or penalise the project: this is the degree of involvement of representatives of the target groups.
Siinkohal on jêllegi Ÿks têhtis faktor, mis výib projektile kas kasuks výi kahjuks tulla: sihtgrup-pide esindajate kaasatuse tase.
There is room for another piece of advice to future projects: an adequate involvement of the target groups, be it during design, implementation or dissemination phases. `Quality of the output' is another important factor contributing to a good impact.
Tulevastele projektidele on Ÿks soovitus: kindlustada on vaja sihtgruppide piisav kaasatus nii planeerimise, elluviimise kui ka levitamise faasis. ¶Vêljundite kvaliteetƒ on samuti oluline faktor, mis soodustab head mýju.
(N = 117 projects, up to three impacts per project)
(N = 117 projekti, kuni kolm mýju projekti kohta)
Increased awareness of their situation
Kasvanud teadlikkus oma olukorrast
Improved means of tackling their situations
Paremad výimalused oma olukorraga toimetulemiseks
Improved access to assistance
Parem juurdepêês abile
Improving their skills
Oma oskuste parandamine
`Increased awareness' is the result of dissemination activities, contacts with representatives of target groups and/or direct involvement in partnerships.
¶Kasvanud teadlikkusƒ on levitustegevuse, otsese partnerluses osalemise ja/výi kontakti tule-mus sihtgruppide esindajatega.
In some projects, end-bene«ciar-ies did not even know before the project about their rights and existing services, as illustrated below.
Mýne projekti puhul ei teadnud lýppabisaajad enne pro-jekti oma ýigustest ja pakutavatest teenustest midagi:
The information campaign broadly touched public opinion.
Teabekampaania puudutas laialdaselt avalikku arvamust.