natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bilanss 31. detsembri 2004. aasta seisuga: 1 451 967 061
Balance sheet at 31 December 2004: 1 451 967 061
nendib, et 2004. aastal seoti 97,76% Euroopa Parlamendi eelarvesse kirjendatud assigneeringutest (tühistamismäär 2,24%) ja saavutati nagu eelnevatelgi aastatel väga kõrge eelarve täitmise tase;
Notes that, in 2004, 97,76 % of the appropriations entered in Parliament's budget were committed, with a cancellation rate of 2,24 %, and that, as in previous years, a very high level of budget implementation was achieved;
palub volitatud eelarvevahendite käsutajatel esitada oma iga-aastastes tegevusaruannetes – nagu osaliselt juba tehakse – põhjused, miks eelarveassigneeringuid ära ei kasutatud; on arvamusel, et neid põhjusi tuleb järgmise aasta eelarve arutamisel arvesse võtta;
Calls on authorising officers by delegation to set out the reasons in their annual activity reports, as has already occurred to some extent, why budget appropriations have not been fully utilised; considers that account must be taken of those reasons during the following year's budgetary discussions;
nendib, et Euroopa Parlamendi tulud 2004. aastal olid 117 409 824 EUR (2003: 98 545 334 EUR);
Notes that, in 2004, Parliament received revenue amounting to EUR 117 409 824 (2003: EUR 98 545 334);
Euroopa Parlamendi kinnisvarapoliitika rõhuasetusega Winston Churchilli (WIC) ja Salvador de Madariaga (SDM) hoonetel
Parliament's property policy, focusing on the Winston Churchill (WIC) and Salvador de Madariaga (SDM) buildings
tuletab meelde, et 2004. aasta eelarve kõrge täitmise tase on osaliselt seletatav alates 1992. aastast levinud assigneeringujääkide ümberpaigutamise tavaga, s.t kõik aasta lõpus kasutadaolevad assigneeringud kantakse üle hoonetele ettenähtud eelarveridadele, eriti kapitali ettemakseteks, et vähendada tulevasi intressimakseid: nii eraldati Louise Weissi (LOW) hoone ostmiseks Strasbourgis assigneeringujääkide ümberpaigutamisega 2003. aasta lõpus üle 70 000 000 EUR ning D4 ja D5 hoonete ostmiseks Brüsselis laekus assigneeringujääkide ümberpaigutamisest 2004. aasta lõpus üle 150 000 000 EUR, mis moodustab 12% eelarveassigneeringutest;
Recalls that the high level of implementation for the 2004 budget is partly attributable to the consistent practice since 1992 of making "mopping-up" transfers for the purposes of transferring any appropriations available at year-end to the budget lines for buildings and, in particular, for advance capital payments to reduce future interest payments, more than EUR 70 000 000 having been made available by means of a mopping-up transfer at the end of 2003 for the purchase of the Louise Weiss (LOW) building in Strasbourg and more than EUR 150 000 000 having been provided by means of the mopping-up transfer at the end of 2004 for the purchase of the D4 and D5 buildings in Brussels, which is equivalent to 12 % of budget appropriations;
on arvamusel, et tagasimaksed hoonete eest tähendavad maksumaksja jaoks suurt säästu ja seetõttu tuleks need kindlaks määrata eelarvestrateegia raames;
Considers that repayments on buildings constitute a major saving for the taxpayer and therefore should be set as part of the budgetary strategy;
palub taas kord eelarvepädevaid institutsioone koostada eelarveprognoos, mis tagab, et eelarveprojekti kirjendatud summad kajastavad Euroopa Parlamendi vastavate poliitikavaldkondade tegelikke vajadusi, et aasta lõpus ei toimuks süstemaatiliselt tohutuid assigneeringute ümberpaigutamisi kinnisvarapoliitikasse;
Calls yet again on the budgetary authority to establish budget forecasts ensuring that the amounts entered in the draft budget reflect real requirements in Parliament's various policy areas so that huge transfers of appropriations are not systematically made at year-end for property policy purposes;
nõuab, et Luxembourgis asuva KADi hoone laiendamisega seotud pakkumismenetlused oleksid läbipaistvaid ja õiglased, kuna tegemist on esimeste ehitust puudutavate pakkumismenetlustega, mida Euroopa Parlament peab ise haldama;
Calls for the tendering procedures for the building of the extension to the KAD building in Luxembourg to be transparent and fair, these being the first construction tendering procedures to be managed by the Parliament itself;
tervitab peasekretäri vastust 2004. aasta eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise küsimustikule seoses LOWi hoone kasutamisega Strasbourgis Euroopa Parlamendi poolt, milles ta selgitas, et Euroopa Parlament "on Strasbourgis asuva LOWi hoone ainuomanik ja võib seda kasutada ja käsutada nii, nagu ta õigeks peab";
Welcomes the Secretary General's answer to the 2004 discharge questionnaire regarding the Parliament's use of the LOW building in Strasbourg that Parliament "is the sole owner of the LOW building in Strasbourg, and may use or dispose of it as it thinks fit;
WIC ja SDM hooned
WIC and SDM buildings
tuletab meelde, et raporti tagasilükkamise tõttu moodustas eelarvekontrollikomisjon 2006. aasta mais mitteametliku töörühma, kelle ülesandeks oli nõustada ja abistada raportööri seoses väidetega Strasbourgis asuvate WIC ja SDM hoonete suhtes kehtivate rendisuhete ja tulevase ostu kohta Euroopa Parlamendi poolt;
Recalls that in May 2006 the Committee on Budgetary Control, in response to the referral back of its report, set up an informal Working Group tasked with advising and assisting the rapporteur in connection with allegations made over the existing lease arrangements and the prospective purchase by Parliament of the WIC and SDM buildings in Strasbourg;
avaldab sügavat kahetsust, et hoolimata eelarvekontrollipädevusest sai eelarvekontrollikomisjon nimetatud korraldusega seotud väidetest teadlikuks ajakirjanduse ja mitte Euroopa Parlamendi administratsiooni või juhatuse vahendusel, nagu oleks pidanud eeldama, sest mõlemad teadsid väidetest mitu nädalat;
Strongly regrets that, despite its budgetary control competence, the Committee only became aware of the allegations relating to the said arrangements from media reports, rather than, as should have been expected, from the administration or from the Bureau of the European Parliament, both of which had been fully aware of the allegations for several weeks;
märgib, et täieliku läbipaistvuse kindlustamiseks nõudis ja sai nimetatud töörühm viivitamatult täieliku avaliku juurdepääsu kogu asjakohasele dokumentatsioonile, mida Euroopa Parlamendi administratsioonis nende hoonete kohta leidub;
Notes that in order to ensure full transparency, the Working Group immediately called for and obtained full public access to all relevant documentation held by the Parliament's administration on these buildings;
on teadlik, et eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise raport peegeldab 2004. aasta finantsolukorda; rõhutab siiski, et selline raport mitte ainult ei juhi tähelepanu minevikus tehtud vigadele või väärtegudele, vaid peaks andma ka soovitusi, kuidas neid tulevikus vältida;
Is aware that the discharge report reflects the financial situation of 2004; stresses, however, that such a report does not merely point out mistakes or acts of wrongdoing that have occurred in the past, but should also make recommendations on how to avoid them in the future;
tuletab meelde SCI Erasme'i ja Strasbourgi linna vahelise rendilepingu olemasolu, mis lõpeb 2010. aastal; arvab kindlasti, et kui Euroopa Parlament otsustab WIC ja/või SDM hooned osta, ei saa ülalmainitud lepingul olla Euroopa Parlamendi jaoks rahalisi tagajärgi; seetõttu leiab, et sel juhul tuleks lepingu kehtivus lõpetada;
Recalls the existence of the rental agreement between SCI Erasme and the City of Strasbourg, which expires in 2010; feels strongly that when Parliament decides to purchase the WIC and/or SDM buildings, the aforementioned agreement cannot in any way have financial consequences for the Parliament; finds therefore that in that case the agreement should cease to exist;
juhib tähelepanu sellele, et kui Euroopa Parlament kavatseb hoone osta, peaks ta samal ajal omandama ka maa; rõhutab, et praeguses etapis tundub ilmne, et Euroopa Parlament võib saada ainult SCI Erasme'i valduses oleva pikaajalise rendilepingu; seetõttu usub, et maa lõplik omandamine on Euroopa Parlamendi ja Strasbourgi linna ning vajadusel Prantsuse riigiasutuste vaheline küsimus;
Points out that if its intention is to purchase the building, it should at the same time acquire the land; emphasises that at this stage it seems evident that the Parliament can only obtain the long lease held by SCI Erasme; believes therefore that the final acquisition of the land will be a matter between the Parliament and the City of Strasbourg and, if necessary, the French national authorities;
tuletab siiski meelde, et kontrollikoda viis hiljuti läbi ehituspoliitika auditi; juhib tähelepanu, et kontrollikoda on oma arvamuses väljendanud muret kahe aasta rendi kogusumma arvutamiseks kasutatud indekseerimise näitaja üle; lisaks järeldab, et kontrollikoda on selgelt öelnud, et indekseerimine võib olla Euroopa Parlamendi jaoks ebasoodus;
Recalls however that the Court of Auditors has recently conducted an audit on buildings policy; points out that in its opinion the Court expressed concerns as to the use of the indexation rates used to calculate the total amount of the bi-annual rent; concludes further that the Court made it clear that the indexation could potentially be unfavourable to Parliament;
märgib, et talle kättesaadavaks tehtud teabe põhjal on töörühm tuvastanud järgmised faktid:
Notes that the facts established by the Working Group, on the basis of information made available to it, are the following:
rendileping, mille alusel Euroopa Parlament kaht nimetatud hoonet rendib, sisaldab kolmepoolset suhet Euroopa Parlamendi enda kui WIC ja SDM hoonete rentija, Strasbourgi linna kui rendileandja ning SCI Erasme'i kui erainvestori ja hoonete omaniku vahel;
the lease agreement by virtue of which Parliament leases the said two buildings involves a triangular relationship between, on the one part, the Parliament itself as the lessee of the WIC and SDM buildings, on the second part, the City of Strasbourg as the lessor and on the third part, SCI Erasme as the private investor and owner of the buildings;
miski ei viita sellele, et rendi- ja lisalepingute sõlmimisel ja rakendamisel oleks olnud ebaseaduslikke toiminguid, kuigi samas püsib kahtlus, kas finantsmääruses sätestatud "usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise" põhimõtet on täielikult järgitud;
there appear to be no indications that there have been unlawful actions in the process of concluding and applying the leases and additional agreements, although there are nevertheless doubts as to whether the principle of "sound financial management" enshrined in the Financial Regulation has been fully respected;
ei ole täiesti usaldusväärset alust WIC ja SDM hoonete sobiva renditasu sätestamiseks, kui Euroopa Parlament on ainus võimalik rentija nagu Strasbourgis; sel juhul ei ole asjakohane ka võrdlus bürooruumide maksumusega eri riikides ja linnades; mõistetavalt muudab see käesoleval juhul raskeks "õiglase rendihinna" kehtestamise ja seega ka hindamise, kas Euroopa Parlament on aastate jooksul tõesti õiglast renti maksnud;
there is no absolutely reliable basis for setting an appropriate rent for the WIC and SDM buildings once Parliament is the only potential client, as in Strasbourg; nor is a comparison with the cost of office space in various countries and cities adequate in this case; understandably, this has made it difficult to establish a "fair price" for the rent in question and therefore to assess whether the Parliament had been paying a truly fair rent over the years;
aastate jooksul tõusnud renditasude peamine põhjus on see, et Euroopa Parlamendi otsuseid tegevad organid nõustusid 1985. aastal Strasbourgi linna ettepanekuga aastased summad indekseerida, eirates kvestorite ja eelarvekomisjoni lahkarvamusi 1980. aastast;
a fundamental reason for the fact that rents have been rising for years is that, in 1985 the Parliament's decision-making bodies agreed to the City of Strasbourg's proposal to index-link the annual amounts, disregarding dissenting opinions delivered in 1980 by the Quaestors and the Committee on Budgets;
märkimisväärne erinevus on nende summade vahel, mida Euroopa Parlament maksab rendina WIC ja SDM hoonete kasutamise eest Strasbourgi linnale ja mida Strasbourgi linn maksab igakuiste tagasimaksetena erainvestorile: Euroopa Parlamendi administratsiooni arvestuste kohaselt on pärast investeerimiskulude ja teostatud tööde kulude mahaarvamist lepingu 25-aastase kehtivusaja jooksul makstud lisasummasid vähemalt 32 000 000 EUR ulatuses; praegu, kui Strasbourgi linna ja SCI Erasme'i lisateave veel puudub, ei saa ka välistada, et lisamaksed võivad ulatuda summani vähemalt 46 000 000 EUR (siseaudit) või kuni 60 000 000 EUR (välisaudit);
there is a considerable difference between, on the one hand, the rent Parliament pays to the City of Strasbourg for use of the WIC and SDM buildings and, on the other, the monthly repayments by the City of Strasbourg to the private investor: according to its administration's calculations, the additional amounts paid over the 25 years of the lease, after deduction of the investment cost and the cost of works carried out, amount to at least EUR 32 000 000; at this point in time, pending further information from the City of Strasbourg and SCI Erasme, it cannot be ruled out that the additional payments might also total at least EUR 46 000 000 (internal audit) or just under EUR 60 000 000 (external audit);
alles 2006. aasta märtsis sai ilmseks, et Euroopa Parlamendi renditasud Strasbourgi linnale ületavad linna tagasimakseid erainvestorile; selle ajani oletas Euroopa Parlament ekslikult, et tema renditasud Strasbourgi linnale edastati täies mahus SCI Erasme'ile, kuigi tegelikult see nii ei olnud;
not until March 2006 were there indications that its rental payments to the City of Strasbourg exceeded the latter's repayments to the private investor; until then, Parliament wrongly assumed that its rental payments to the City of Strasbourg were passed on in full to SCI Erasme when, in fact, this was not the case;
kogu selle pika aja vältel ei kahelnud Euroopa Parlamendi administratsioon kunagi, et renditasud moodustavad "õiglase rendi", ega kontrollinud kordagi, kas tema renditasud edastati täies mahus SCI Erasme'ile, kuid ka Strasbourgi linn ei teavitanud teda sellest kordagi;
throughout this long period of time, its administration never questioned whether the rent payments constituted "fair rent" and never verified whether its lease payments were being passed on in full to SCI Erasme, nor was it on the other hand ever informed about this matter by the City of Strasbourg itself;
ainult Strasbourgi linn teadis kahe erineva lepingulise suhte olemasolust kolme osalise vahel ja vaid Strasbourgi linn on olnud teadlik kahe summa vahelisest erinevusest alates 1981. aastast;
only the City of Strasbourg knew of the existence of two different contractual relationships between the three parties involved and only the City of Strasbourg had been aware of the difference between the two amounts since 1981;
Strasbourgi linn teavitas Euroopa Parlamendi administratsiooni 29. novembril 2005. aastal saadetud kirjas, et läbirääkimised erainvestoriga ei ole lõppenud; hiljemalt siis oleks Euroopa Parlamendi administratsioon pidanud mõistma, et Strasbourgi linn ja erainvestor on läbirääkimisi pidanud;
its administration was notified by letter of 29 November 2005 by the City of Strasbourg that negotiations with the private investor had not been ended; at that point, at the latest, its administration should have realised that there had been negotiations between the City of Strasbourg and the private investor;
renditasu, mida Euroopa Parlament oma hoonete eest maksab, peaks katma ehitus-, ülalpidamis- ja kasutuskulud, aga mingil juhul ei tohiks see sisaldada kasumimarginaali võõrustajariigi või selle kohalike või piirkondlike omavalitsuste jaoks; samuti on tavaks, et riik annab talle kuuluvad maad ELi institutsiooni käsutusse tasuta ja piiranguteta; tuleb siiski möönda, et midagi eelnevast ei olnud lepinguga sätestatud, heade suhete tõttu Strasbourgi linnavalitsuse kui eeldatavalt kasumit mittetaotleva avaliku asutusega; peale selle pole õigusnorme, mis keelaksid riigil või kohalikul või piirkondlikul omavalitsusel kasumit saada; on siiski seisukohal, et Strasbourgi linna lähenemisviis on vähemalt ebaviisakas, kuna see on vastuolus külalislahkuse nõuetega rahvusvaheliste institutsioonide suhtes;
the rent it pays for its official premises should cover the cost of construction, upkeep and use, but should not in any way contain a profit margin for the host country or local or regional authorities in that country; equally, it is also customary that any public land made available by a Member State for the purpose of hosting an EU institution is granted to the said institution free and unencumbered; it has to be conceded, however, that none of this was contractually laid down because of the good relationship with the City of Strasbourg as a supposedly non-profit-seeking public body; besides, there are no legal provisions prohibiting a state or local or regional authority from making a profit; takes the view, however, that the City of Strasbourg's approach is discourteous, to say the very least, since it is contrary to rules on hospitality towards international institutions;
Strasbourgi linnale oli teada, et Euroopa Parlament jättis hüvitusklauslid varalistest lepingutest järjekindlalt välja, kuid ta ignoreeris seda teadlikult; see on kahjustanud Strasbourgi linna ja Euroopa Parlamendi usaldusvahekorda;
the City of Strasbourg was aware of Parliament's consistent exclusion of compensation clauses in property contracts, yet deliberately ignored it; that has dealt a blow to the relationship of trust between the City of Strasbourg and the Parliament;
taunib Strasbourgi linna tagasitõmbumist kolmepoolsetelt läbirääkimistelt Euroopa Parlamendiga, mille jooksul on talle kinnitatud, et kaotushüvitus seoses Strasbourgi linna ja SCI Erasme'i vahelise pikaajalise rendilepinguga on välistatud; seda seisukohta eirati Strasbourgi linna järgmistel kahepoolsetel läbirääkimistel SCI Erasme'iga;
deplores the City of Strasbourg's withdrawal from tripartite negotiations with the Parliament, in the course of which it had been reiterated that compensation for loss of the long lease between the City of Strasbourg and SCI Erasme was excluded; this position was then ignored in the City of Strasbourg's subsequent bilateral negotiations with SCI Erasme;
teeb neist kogemustest järgmised järeldused:
Draws the following conclusions from what has been experienced:
kahetseb sügavalt heausksuse puudumist nii Strasbourgi linna kui ka erainvestor SCI Erasme'i suhetes Euroopa Parlamendiga; samuti kahetseb Euroopa Parlamendi administratsiooni vähest otsusekindlust;
deeply regrets the lack of good faith demonstrated by both the City of Strasbourg and the private investor, SCI Erasme in their relationships with Parliament; equally regrets the lack of resolve on the part of the administration of Parliament itself;
kutsub juhatust üles rendilepingut Strasbourgi linnaga 31. oktoobriks 2006 üles ütlema, et, juhul kui hoonete müük peaks edasi lükkuma, leppida kokku uus ja asjakohane renditasu;
calls on the Bureau to give notice on the lease with the City of Strasbourg for 31 October 2006 in order - should purchase of the buildings be delayed - to negotiate a new and appropriate rent;
kutsub juhatust üles kaaluma, kas oleks asjakohane kanda Strasbourgi linnale 2006. aasta esimese poolaasta eest üle esialgu ainult summa, mis võimaldab linnal katta tagasimaksed SCI-Erasmele, mitte aga kogu renti;
calls on the Bureau to examine whether it might be appropriate to pay the City of Strasbourg, for the first half of 2006, initially only a rental amount allowing it to cover the repayments to SCI Erasme, but not the full rent;
on seisukohal, et võiks olla mõistlik jätkata WIC ja SDM hoonete ostukava, kui seejuures võetakse arvesse järgmisi tegureid: asjakohase rendi ja seetõttu ka tulevase ostuhinna suurus on ebaselge; hoonete vanus; põhimõtteliselt ei maksta hüvitust; Euroopa Parlamendi 25 aasta jooksul tasutud ja mitteõigustatud lisasummad tuleks ostuhinnaga tasaarvestada; maa ja hooned tuleks omandada üheaegselt;
considers that it might be reasonable to continue to seek to purchase the WIC and SDM buildings if, in the process, the following are factored in: that what constitutes an appropriate rent and hence a prospective purchase price remain uncertain; the age of the buildings; that no compensation can be paid on principle; that Parliament's additional and unwarranted payments over 25 years should be offset against the purchase price; and that land and buildings should be acquired simultaneously;
on seisukohal, et käesolev kolmiksuhe ei soodustanud täielikku läbipaistvust ega usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise tagamist ja on seetõttu seisukohal, et ELi institutsioonide ja organite ehituspoliitikas tuleks sellist olukorda vältida;
considers that the triangular relationship existing in this case was not conducive to full transparency or to guarantees of sound financial management and considers, therefore, that it should be avoided in the buildings policy of EU institutions and bodies;
kutsub oma pädevaid organeid üles muutma eelarve täitmise sise-eeskirja artiklit 16 selliselt, et eelarvekomisjon peab andma oma nõusoleku ehitusprojektidele, millel on Euroopa Parlamendi eelarvele märkimisväärne rahaline mõju;
calls on its competent bodies to amend Article 16 of the Internal Rules for the implementation of the European Parliament's budget to make building projects with significant financial implications for Parliament's budget subject to the agreement of the Committee on Budgets;
kutsub oma administratsiooni üles võtma vajalikke meetmeid, et korrapäraselt vähemalt iga viie aasta tagant kontrollida pikaajalisi lepingulisi kohustusi kolmandate osaliste suhtes, näiteks rendi- või teenuslepingud; nende kontrollide tulemused peaksid kajastuma ka peadirektorite tegevusaruannetes; nõuab, et esimene niisugune aruanne valmiks aegsasti enne 2005. aasta eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise menetlust ning igal järgneval aastal lisatakse see aasta tegevusaruande erijakku;
calls on its administration to take the necessary measures for a regular review, at least every five years, of long-standing contractual obligations towards third parties, e.g. leases or service contracts; the results of those checks should also be included in the activity reports of the directors-general; calls for the first such report to be completed in good time for the budget discharge procedure for 2005 and subsequently included in an ad hoc section of the annual activity report every year thereafter;
teeb oma administratsioonile ülesandeks, koostöös teiste liidu asutustega, koostada aruanne selle kohta, kas oleks võimalik asutada Euroopa Liidu Ehitusamet, mis vastutaks ELi asutuste ja organite hoonete ehituse ja korrashoiu eest; nõuab, et see aruanne edastataks eelarvekontrollikomisjonile hiljemalt 1. oktoobriks 2007;
charges its administration, in consultation with the other Union institutions, to draw up a report examining whether it might be feasible to establish a European Buildings Authority charged with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU institutions and bodies; calls for such report to be forwarded to the Committee on Budgetary Control by 1 October 2007 at the latest;
nendib, et Strasbourgi linn, eelkõige aga SCI Erasme ei ole veel vastanud kõigile Euroopa Parlamendi teabepäringutele; arutab seetõttu seda küsimust uuesti 2005. aasta eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise menetluse käigus;
notes that the City of Strasbourg, but more particularly SCI Erasme have not yet met all Parliament's requests for information; will therefore re-examine the issue at stake in the 2005 discharge procedure;
palub eelarvekontrollikomisjonil uuesti uurida Euroopa Parlamendi kinnisvarapoliitikat 2005. aasta eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise menetluse käigus ja igal järgneval aastal;
calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control to conduct a fresh examination of Parliament's property policy during the 2005 discharge procedure and thereafter on a regular basis;