natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ei saa me siiski nõustuda raportis esitatud lähenemisviisiga, milles sekkutakse täielikult liikmesriikide pädevusse kuuluvatesse küsimustesse, eelkõige perekonnaõigusse, kriminaalõigusse ning avalikku korda.
- We do not agree with the approach taken by the report, which goes into the merits of subjects which are within the exclusive competence of the Member States, in particular family law, criminal law and law and order;
Samuti ei ole meile vastuvõetav raporti põhjenduse S allmärkus, milles viidatakse mõistete „pereliige”, „muud pereliikmed” ja „partner” piiravale tõlgendamisele liikmesriikide poolt.
- We also find unacceptable the footnote in the report (Recital S) referring to a presumed "restrictive interpretation" by Member States of the notion of "family member", of "any other family member" and of "partner".
Allmärkuses kritiseeritakse üldist suundumust mitte tunnistada kolmandat/neljandat abikaasat ja esildatakse direktiivi 38/2004 liiga lai ja mitmeti mõistetav tõlgendus, mis võib soodustada fiktiivabieludega seotud pettusi või viia isegi polügaamia legitiimsuse paradoksaalse tunnustamiseni.
The footnote criticises the "general trend against the recognition of third/fourth spouses", proposing, therefore, a broad and ambiguous interpretation of Directive 38/2004 which could encourage the fraudulent practice of marriages of convenience, or even the paradoxical recognition of the legitimacy of polygamy.
2. märgib pettumusega, et üksnes Küprosel, Kreekas, Soomes, Luksemburgis, Maltal, Portugalis ja Hispaanias toimub direktiivi ülevõtmine rahuldavalt;
Notes with disappointment that only in Cyprus, Greece, Finland, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal and Spain is the transposition of the Directive satisfactory;
4. märgib, et kuna liikmesriigid ei ole direktiivi nõuetekohaselt kohaldanud, tuleb kaaluda kõige problemaatilisemate sätete muutmist, nimelt kolmandatest riikidest pärinevate pereliikmete sisenemis- ja riigis elamise õigust ning nõuet, mille kohaselt ELi kodanikud peavad koos elamisloa taotlusega esitama direktiivis mitte ette nähtud täiendavaid dokumente;
Notes that the failure of the correct application of the Directive by the Member States calls for consideration of amending the most problematic provisions, namely the right of entry and residence of third country family members and the requirement for EU citizens to submit, along with the applications for residence, additional documents not provided for in the Directive;
7. märgib, et käesolevast direktiivist kasu saavate registreeritud elukaaslaste olukord ei ole alati selge, eelkõige riikides, kus registreeritud partnerlussuhet ei tunnustata; palub komisjonil seda direktiivi olulist aspekti hoolikalt kontrollida;
Notes that the situation of registered partners who benefit from the Directive is not always clear, especially in those countries which do not recognise registered partnership; asks the Commission to monitor this important aspect of the Directive carefully;
It also ‘takes for granted’ that MS comply with, and adhere closely to, the dynamic jurisprudence of the ECJ on these matters, and that the European Commission can secure compliance through its Treaty-based powers (e.g. Article 226 EC Treaty) and its current human and financial resources.
It also ‘takes for granted’ that MS comply with, and adhere closely to, the dynamic jurisprudence of the ECJ on these matters, and that the European Commission can secure compliance through its Treaty-based powers (e.g. Article 226 EC Treaty) and its current human and financial resources.
This is not consistent with Article 5(2) of the Directive which allows for the entry into a MS if in possession of other documentation such as a residence card issued by another MS. According to the questionnaire from the Czech Republic “a family member of an EU citizen who is not himself a citizen of the European Union is also obliged, during border control, to present the police with a visa authorizing him to present in the territory of the country if he is subject to a visa duty”.
This is not consistent with Article 5(2) of the Directive which allows for the entry into a MS if in possession of other documentation such as a residence card issued by another MS. According to the questionnaire from the Czech Republic “a family member of an EU citizen who is not himself a citizen of the European Union is also obliged, during border control, to present the police with a visa authorizing him to present in the territory of the country if he is subject to a visa duty”.
According to the European Commission’s Report COM(2008) 840, on the basis of the Akrich judgement, Case C-109/01, Denmark, Ireland, Finland and the UK had made the right of residence conditional on their prior lawful residence in another MS. The report also highlights how other seven Member States had adopted a similar position through administrative practices.
According to the European Commission’s Report COM(2008) 840, on the basis of the Akrich judgement, Case C-109/01, Denmark, Ireland, Finland and the UK had made the right of residence conditional on their prior lawful residence in another MS. The report also highlights how other seven Member States had adopted a similar position through administrative practices.
Act No. 326/1999 Coll.
Act No. 326/1999 Coll.
Art. 40 bis, § 2, Loi 15.12.1980 sur l'accès au territoire, le séjour, l'établissement et l'éloignement des étrangers (LAT).
Art. 40 bis, § 2, Loi 15.12.1980 sur l'accès au territoire, le séjour, l'établissement et l'éloignement des étrangers (LAT).
Art. 42, §4 LAT does not refer to this obligation.
Art. 42, §4 LAT does not refer to this obligation.
§2, Dziennik Ustaw, No. 217, item 1616, read together with article 15§3 of the Aliens Act.
§2, Dziennik Ustaw, No. 217, item 1616, read together with article 15§3 of the Aliens Act.
No. 48/2002 Coll., Sec.
No. 48/2002 Coll., Sec.
See Decree 30/2007 of 6 February 2007 as amended and consolidated by Decree No. 32 of 28 February 2008, Article 20.
See Decree 30/2007 of 6 February 2007 as amended and consolidated by Decree No. 32 of 28 February 2008, Article 20.
Refer to Article 25 (2) of Law No. 260/2005, Official Gazette, No. 900, 7 October 2005.
Refer to Article 25 (2) of Law No. 260/2005, Official Gazette, No. 900, 7 October 2005.
Further, in some MS, in particular Italy and France , the expulsion of citizens of the Union after three months residence where they cannot show that they have sufficient resources seems disproportionately exercised against nationals of one particular MS: i.e. Romania .
Further, in some MS, in particular Italy and France , the expulsion of citizens of the Union after three months residence where they cannot show that they have sufficient resources seems disproportionately exercised against nationals of one particular MS: i.e. Romania .
Indeed, from the information provided by the questionnaires it appears that this requirement was misinterpreted, and at times completely ignored, in a number of MS. As a way of illustration, in Lithuania , the decision obliging an EU national or his/her family member to leave the country must be implemented without delay, within one month of the taking of the decision.
Indeed, from the information provided by the questionnaires it appears that this requirement was misinterpreted, and at times completely ignored, in a number of MS. As a way of illustration, in Lithuania , the decision obliging an EU national or his/her family member to leave the country must be implemented without delay, within one month of the taking of the decision.
See Article 17 (1) and (2) of the Royal Decree No. 240/2007 of 16 February 2007 on the entry, free movement and residence in Spain of citizens of the Member States of the EU and other States party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
See Article 17 (1) and (2) of the Royal Decree No. 240/2007 of 16 February 2007 on the entry, free movement and residence in Spain of citizens of the Member States of the EU and other States party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
Police and judicial cooperation in the European Union (Hampshire: Ashgate), pp. 289-307.
Police and judicial cooperation in the European Union (Hampshire: Ashgate), pp. 289-307.
Guild, E. (2007a), Making the EU Citizens’ Agenda Work , CEPS Policy Brief No. 122, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS): Brussels, February 2007.
Guild, E. (2007a), Making the EU Citizens’ Agenda Work , CEPS Policy Brief No. 122, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS): Brussels, February 2007.
13, Issue 5, pp. 591-622.
13, Issue 5, pp. 591-622.
13, Issue 5, pp. 623-646.
13, Issue 5, pp. 623-646.
- facilitate entry and residence for “other” family members and partners, including of same sex and how?
- facilitate entry and residence for “other” family members and partners , including of same sex and how?
Ühise kalanduspoliitika juhtimine – Euroopa Parlament, piirkondlikud nõuandekomisjonid ja teised asjaosalised
on Governance within the CFP: the European Parliament, the Regional Advisory Councils and other actors
ühise kalanduspoliitika juhtimise kohta – Euroopa Parlament, piirkondlikud nõuandekomisjonid ja teised asjaosalised
on Governance within the CFP: the European Parliament, the Regional Advisory Councils and other actors
– võttes arvesse nõukogu 20. detsembri 2002. aasta määrust (EÜ) 2371/2002 ühisele kalanduspoliitikale vastava kalavarude kaitse ja säästva kasutamise kohta
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy
– võttes arvesse nõukogu 27. märtsi 2000. aasta määrust (EÜ) 657/2000 kalandussektori ja ühise kalanduspoliitika mõjualasse kuuluvate rühmade vahelise dialoogi tõhustamise kohta
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) 657/2000 of 27 March 2000 on closer dialogue with the fishing sector and groups affected by the common fisheries policy
– võttes arvesse komisjoni otsuseid 71/128/EMÜ, 1999/478/EÜ ja 2004/864/EÜ;
– having regard to Commission Decisions 71/128/EEC, 1999/478/EC and 2004/864/EC,
– võttes arvesse komisjoni otsust 93/619/EÜ, mida on uuendatud 2005. aastal komisjoni otsusega 2005/629/EÜ;
– having regard to Commission Decision 93/619/EC, renewed in 2005 by Commission Decision 2005/629/EC,
– võttes arvesse komisjoni otsuseid 74/441/EMÜ ja 98/500/EÜ;
– having regard to Commission Decisions 74/441/EEC and 98/500/EC,
– võttes arvesse nõukogu 19. juuli 2004. aasta otsust 2004/585/EÜ, millega asutatakse ühise kalanduspoliitika raames piirkondlikud nõuandekomisjonid
– having regard to Council Decision 2004/585/EC of 19 July 2004 establishing Regional Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy
– võttes arvesse komisjoni 17. juuni 2008. aasta teatist piirkondlike nõuandekomisjonide toimimise läbivaatamise kohta ( KOM(2008)0364 );
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 17 June 2008 on the review of the functioning of the Regional Advisory Councils (COM (2008)0364),
– võttes arvesse kalanduskomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0187/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0187/2009 ),
A. arvestades, et ühise kalanduspoliitika institutsioonilisse juhtimisse on kaasatud komisjon, Euroopa Parlament, nõukogu, Regioonide Komitee, Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomitee, kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse nõuandekomitee (ACFA), kalanduse teadus-, tehnika- ja majanduskomitee (STECF), merekalapüügi alase valdkondliku sotsiaaldialoogi komitee (SSDC) ja piirkondlikud nõuandekomisjonid (PNKd);
A. whereas institutional governance of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) involves the Commission, the European Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA), the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee on Fisheries (STECF), the Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee for Sea Fisheries (SSDC) and the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs),
B. arvestades, et ühise kalanduspoliitika juhtimisse on kaasatud ka liikmesriikide riiklikud ja piirkondlikud ametiasutused;
B. whereas the governance of the CFP also involves the national and regional administrations of the Member States,
C. arvestades, et ühendus osaleb erinevates piirkondlikes kalandusorganisatsioonides ja kalandusalaseid partnerluslepinguid on sõlmitud ka kolmandate riikidega;
C. whereas the Community participates in various Regional Fisheries Organisations and Fisheries Partnership Agreements are also concluded with third countries,
D. arvestades, et Lissaboni lepingu kohaselt jäetakse Euroopa Parlament ka edaspidi kõrvale lubatud kogupüükide ja kvootide määramisest;
D. whereas, under the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament would continue to be excluded from the setting of TACs and quotas,
E. arvestades, et Euroopa Parlamendi liikmete osalemine piirkondlike kalandusorganisatsioonide kohtumistel toimub praegu ad hoc ;
E. whereas attendance of members of Parliament at meetings of Regional Fisheries Organisations is currently on an ad hoc basis,
F. arvestades, et teavitamine kalandusalaste partnerluslepingute tegelikust toimimisest, sh ühiste järelevalvekomiteede tegevusest, võiks toimuda rahuldavamal tasemel;
F. whereas communication concerning the actual operation of Fisheries Partnership agreements, including the activities of the Joint Monitoring Committees, could be more satisfactory,
G. arvestades, et kalanduse teadus-, tehnika- ja majanduskomitee asutati 1993, et kalanduse nõuandekomitee asutati 1971 ja nimetati 1999. aastal ümber kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse nõuandekomiteeks, ning et merekalapüügi alase valdkondliku sotsiaaldialoogi komitee asutati 1999, asendades alates 1974. aastast toimiva ühiskomitee;
G. whereas STECF was established in 1993, an Advisory Committee for Fisheries in 1971 and renamed as AFCA in 1999 and a Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee for Sea Fisheries in 1999, replacing a Joint Committee existing since 1974,
H. arvestades, et kõik seitse PNKd praegu tegutsevad;
H. whereas all seven RACs are now operational,
I. arvestades, et on loodud piirkondlike nõuandekomisjonidevaheline komitee, kellel toimuvad komisjoniga koordineerivad kohtumised;
I. whereas an Inter-RAC Committee has been established and has co-ordination meetings with the Commission,
J. arvestades, et komisjon on hiljuti läbi viinud ACFA ja PNKde hindamise, kuid STECFi töö hindamist veel mitte;
J. whereas the Commission has recently undertaken evaluations of AFCA and of the RACs but none so far of the work of STECF,
K. arvestades, et ACFA hindamisel esitati rida praktilisi soovitusi ja pakuti välja erinevaid alternatiive selle tegevuseks pikemas perspektiivis;
K. whereas the evaluation of AFCA has made a number of operational recommendations and suggested various options for its long term future,
L. arvestades, et hinnang PNKdele oli positiivne, kuid komisjon määratles nende toimimise parandamiseks rea meetmeid, mis ei nõua uusi õigusakte;
L. whereas the evaluation of the RACs has been positive, but the Commission has identified a number of actions, not requiring new legislation, to improve their functioning;
M. arvestades, et kõikide osalejate meelest on vaja tihedamat dialoogi teadlaste ja kalurite vahel ning et PNKd on kutsunud üles suurendama sotsiaalmajanduslikku panust otsuste tegemisel;
M. whereas all parties are agreed that a stronger dialogue between scientists and fishermen is needed and the RACs have also called for better socio-economic input into decision-taking,
N. arvestades, et teatavad PNKd ja Euroopa Parlamendi liikmed on väljendanud soovi suhete ametlikumaks muutmiseks;
N. whereas certain RACs and members of Parliament have expressed a desire for a more formal relationship,
O. arvestades, et piiratud rahastamine ja PNKdele eraldatud vahendite juhtimise ja finantskontrolliga seotud komisjoni liigselt bürokraatlik ja jäik hoiak takistavad nende aktiivsemat tegevust;
O. whereas increasing activity on the part of the RACs is hampered by limited funding and the Commission’s excessively bureaucratic and inflexible approach to management and financial control regarding the funds allocated to them,
P. arvestades, et komisjon on lubanud enne uute õigusnormide sisseviimist kuulata ära Euroopa Parlamendi, nõukogu ja sidusrühmade seisukohad;
P. whereas the Commission has said that it will listen to the views Parliament, the Council and the stakeholders before introducing new legal rules,
Q. arvestades, et komisjoni esindajad ei osale sageli PNK töörühmade koosolekutel;
Q. whereas Commission representatives frequently fail to attend RAC working group meetings,
R. arvestades siiski, et on juba tõendeid sellest, et ühise kalanduspoliitika eeskirjade suurenenud järgimine tuleneb sidusrühmade osalemisest nende loomisel ja rakendamisel;
R. whereas there is, however, already evidence that increased compliance with the rules of the CFP results from the involvement of stakeholders in their creation and implementation,
S. arvestades, et eksisteerib suur hulk erinevaid ühenduse püügipiirkondi, igaüks oma erinevate omadustega;
S. whereas there is a multiplicity of different Community fisheries, each with its own characteristics,
T. arvestades, et ühise kalanduspoliitika reformi osas toimuvad juba konsultatsioonid;
T. whereas consultations are already taking place on the reform of the CFP,
U. arvestades, et PNK soovitustele ei pühendata alati asjakohast tähelepanu, eriti kui täitevkomiteed ei ole neid ühehäälselt heaks kiitnud,
U. whereas RAC recommendations are not always given proper attention, especially when they have not been approved unanimously by the executive committees,
2. nõuab, et nõukogu, komisjon ja Euroopa Parlament viiksid lõpule oma töö, et saavutada toimiv kokkulepe, millega normaliseeritaks Euroopa Parlamendi kalanduskomisjoni liikmete osalemine piirkondlikes kalavarude majandamise organisatsioonides ja muudes rahvusvahelistes organites, mille kohtumistel arutatakse ühist kalanduspoliitikat mõjutavaid teemasid, ilma et see piiraks nende praegust vaatlejastaatust koosolekutel, mille suhtes on juba kokku lepitud;
Calls for the Council, the Commission, and Parliament to complete the work required to reach a genuine agreement laying down standard forms of participation for members of Parliament's Committee on Fisheries in regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) and other international bodies whose meetings are given over to discussion of subjects affecting the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), on the understanding that this should in no way detract from their present observer status at meetings for which such an arrangement has been agreed;
4. juhib tähelepanu sellele, et oluline on tagada komisjoni esindajate korrapärasem osalemine PNK töörühmade ja täitevkomiteede koosolekutel;
Points to the importance of ensuring that Commission representatives attend RAC working group and executive committee meetings more regularly;
- oma rolli ja eesmärkide selgem määratlus koos nendele vastava koosseisulise esindatusega ning uuemate liikmesriikide tõeline esindatus ja parem osalemine;
- a clearer definition of its role and objectives, with a representative composition adequately reflecting them and genuinely representative, and improved participation by the newer Member States;
- ACFA töömeetodid selles osas, mis puudutab tegevuse jaotamist täiskogu istungite ja töörühmade vahel, nende arv ja volitused ning kasutatavad menetlused;
- its working methods in terms of the division of activity between plenary meetings and working groups, their number and remits, and their procedures;
- esitatud probleemide parem sõnastamine;
- better formulation of the questions addressed to it;
- teavitamise ja kommunikatsiooni parandamine elektroonilise meedia kasutuse, andmetele otsesema juurdepääsu ning paremate tingimuste loomise abil suulisele ja kirjalikule tõlkimisele;
- improvement of communication and information through use of electronic media, more direct access to data and improved facilities for translation and interpretation;
- piisav rahastamine ja parimad jätkusuutlike tugifunktsioonide vahendid,
- adequacy of funding and the best means of sustaining support functions;
- suurendaks nende nähtavust ja ergutaks arvukamate sidusrühmade osalemist;
- increase their visibility and encourage participation by a wider range of stakeholders;
- parandaks nende juurdepääsu teaduslikele uurimismaterjalidele ja andmetele ning koostööle STECFiga;
- improve their access to scientific evidence and data and liaison with STECF;
- kaasaks neid nõuandeprotsessi nii varajases staadiumis kui võimalik;
- involve them as early as possible in the consultation process;
12. on veendunud, et laiem osalemine PNKdes nõuab nende koosseisu läbivaatamist, kuid et praegust tasakaalu kalatööstuse ja teiste organisatsioonide vahel ei tohiks rikkuda;
Believes that wider participation in RACs requires a review of their composition but that the current balance between the fishing industry and other organisations should not be disturbed;
- määrata igale PNK-le komisjoniliikme(te)st kontaktisik(ud) ja anda aru selle tegevusest;
- appoint member(s) of the Committee as a liaison for each RAC and to report on its activities;
- tagada, et PNKsid kutsutakse korrapäraste ajavahemike järel ja eriti siis, kui päevakorras on küsimused, milles nad annavad nõu või soovitusi, osalema parlamendi kalanduskomisjoni koosolekutel, et esitada oma nõuanded või soovitused;
- ensure that at regular intervals and, in particular, when the agenda covers matters on which they are involved in giving advice or making recommendations, RACs are invited to participate in Parliament's Committee on Fisheries in order to present their advice or recommendations,
- kehtestada kord, millega tagatakse, et kalanduskomisjoni, PNKde ja PNKde-vahelise komitee sekretariaadid oleksid regulaarselt ühenduses, et vahetada ja koguda teavet nende tegevuse, nõuannete ja soovituste kohta;
- establish a procedure to ensure that the secretariats of the Committee on Fisheries, the RACs, and the Inter-RAC Committee remain in regular contact for the purpose of exchanging and gathering information related to their activities, advice, and recommendations,
- korraldada iga-aastane konverents PNKde ja komisjoni osavõtul;
- host an annual conference involving the RACs and the Commission;
18. palub PNKdel hoida kalanduskomisjoni kursis oma tegevuse, nõuannete ja soovitustega ning kutsuda neid koosolekutel osalema;
Asks the RACs to keep members of its Fisheries Committee informed of their activities, advice and recommendations and to invite their attendance at meetings;
23. usub samuti, et tulevane ühise kalanduspoliitika reform peaks täielikult ära kasutama PNKde konsolideerumist, et muuta ühine kalanduspoliitika detsentraliseeritumaks, et vastu võetud ühiseid meetmeid saaks eri piirkondades rakendada vastavalt püügipiirkondade omapärale ja püügitingimustele;
Believes also that the coming reform of the CFP should take full advantage of the consolidation of the RACs for an increased decentralisation of the CFP, in order that common measures adopted may be applied in the different zones in line with the specific peculiarities of different fisheries and fishing conditions;
Ühise kalanduspoliitika institutsioonilisse juhtimisse on kaasatud peale komisjoni, nõukogu ja Euroopa Parlamendi mitmed organid, näiteks kalanduse teadus-, tehnika- ja majanduskomitee (STECF), kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse nõuandekomitee (ACFA), merekalapüügi alase valdkondliku sotsiaaldialoogi komitee (SSDC) ja piirkondlikud nõuandekomisjonid (PNKd).
Institutional governance of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) involves, besides the Commission, Council and the Parliament, various bodies such as the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), the Advisory Council for Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA), the Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee for Sea Fisheries (SSDC) and the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs).
Ka Regioonide Komiteel ning Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteel on täita oma osa arvamuste esitamisel.
The Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee also have a role in providing opinions.