natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council welcomes the work already carried out by the Institutions on alternative financing methods and awaits the coming report from the Commission.
The Council welcomes the work already carried out by the Institutions on alternative financing methods and awaits the coming report from the Commission.
The Council attaches great importance to receive the information required by the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation as soon as possible.
The Council attaches great importance to receive the information required by the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation as soon as possible.
The information should include thorough need assessments and comprehensive cost-benefit analyses, the various alternatives, outlining the options to rent or buy as well as the alternative financing possibilities, and taking all financing costs into account.
The information should include thorough need assessments and comprehensive cost-benefit analyses, the various alternatives, outlining the options to rent or buy as well as the alternative financing possibilities, and taking all financing costs into account.
Well before decisions need to be taken, the information should be made available to both arms of the budgetary authority, so that they can establish their position without time pressure.
Well before decisions need to be taken, the information should be made available to both arms of the budgetary authority, so that they can establish their position without time pressure.
Moreover, it reiterates its call on the Secretaries-General of the Institutions to provide information before the presentation of the preliminary draft budget.
Moreover, it reiterates its call on the Secretaries-General of the Institutions to provide information before the presentation of the preliminary draft budget.
While recognising each Institution's own specificities and additional particularities characterising each project, the Council asks the Institutions to pursue their work towards harmonising this information through common definitions and indicators to allow comparisons of building space and building costs between the different Institutions, including the common understanding of the method for calculating annual costs of own property spread over the entire period of their utilisation.
While recognising each Institution's own specificities and additional particularities characterising each project, the Council asks the Institutions to pursue their work towards harmonising this information through common definitions and indicators to allow comparisons of building space and building costs between the different Institutions, including the common understanding of the method for calculating annual costs of own property spread over the entire period of their utilisation.
The Council encourages the Institutions to continue and to intensify the energy-efficiency and environment measures in their buildings, including the certification according to environmental standards, wherever this is appropriate and feasible with the given resources.
The Council encourages the Institutions to continue and to intensify the energy-efficiency and environment measures in their buildings, including the certification according to environmental standards, wherever this is appropriate and feasible with the given resources.
The Council takes note of the excellent cooperation between the Institutions and the administrations of their host Member States, which contribute significantly to the sound management of building issues.
The Council takes note of the excellent cooperation between the Institutions and the administrations of their host Member States, which contribute significantly to the sound management of building issues.
The Council recalls that its observations apply equally to the specific situation of the executive agencies, and where applicable to the decentralised agencies."
The Council recalls that its observations apply equally to the specific situation of the executive agencies, and where applicable to the decentralised agencies."
UNILATERAL DECLARATION FOR ENTRY IN THE COUNCIL MINUTES
UNILATERAL DECLARATION FOR ENTRY IN THE COUNCIL MINUTES
"With regard to the adoption of the Council's position on the draft budget for 2010 and in view of proceedings pending before the Court of First Instance, Germany states that the programme "Food aid for the most deprived persons in the European Union" must be implemented in accordance with Community law.
"With regard to the adoption of the Council's position on the draft budget for 2010 and in view of proceedings pending before the Court of First Instance, Germany states that the programme "Food aid for the most deprived persons in the European Union" must be implemented in accordance with Community law.
Germany states its view that market purchasing should not be used for this programme.
Germany states its view that market purchasing should not be used for this programme.
The programme must be implemented in the light of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance."
The programme must be implemented in the light of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance."
I. 2010. aasta eelarvemenetluse kontekst
I. Context of the 2010 budget procedure
Euroopa Liidu kodanikud elavad liidu teise poolsajandi künnisel kartuses ja ebakindluses.
In the beginning of the second 50 year of the European Union, its citizens live in apprehension and insecurity.
Tänased majanduskriisi, energiatarnete, kliimamuutuste, ebaseadusliku sisserände, kuritegevuse ja terrorismi probleemid näitavad, et EL peab pakkuma selget ja otsustavat abi: tahaksime pakkuda Euroopa kodanikele suuremat julgeolekut ja ohutust.
The current problems of economic crisis, energy supply, climate change, illegal immigration, crime, and terrorism show that the EU has to provide clear and determined help: we would like to give more security and safety to the European citizens.
Euroopa Liidu ühised kulutused peavad võimalikult suures ulatuses keskenduma valdkondadele, kus rahastamine pakub suuremat ohutust ja julgeolekut ning kus seda tõhusamalt kasutada saab.
Common spending of the European Union needs to focus to the largest possible extent on those areas, where funds bring more safety and security and can be used more efficiently.
Igal aastal laskuvad Euroopa Parlament ja nõukogu, kaks eelarvepädevat institutsiooni, pikkadesse ja karmidesse vaidlustesse ELi eelarve maksete assigneeringute taseme üle.
Every year the European Parliament and the Council, as two arms of the budgetary authority, engage in long and harsh debates on the level of payment appropriations of the EU budget.
Euroopa Parlamendil õnnestus seda taset teatud määral tõsta, kuid seda ei ole tõhusalt kasutatud, peamiselt liikmesriikide rakendamisvõimekuse puudumise tõttu, mis vähendab samal ajal Euroopa Parlamendi pingutusi ja alandab mainet avalikkuse silmis.
The European Parliament managed to achieve some increase with regard to this level, however this has been not used effectively, mainly due to the lack of implementation capacity of the Member States, diminish at the same time the efforts and the authority of the European Parliament in the public opinion.
Vaatamata kõnealuste lisarahade probleemsele rakendamisele kinnitab raportöör, et võrreldes Euroopa Liidu arvukate eesmärkidega on ühiskavad endiselt alarahastatud.
Despite of the problematic implementation of these "extra funds", the rapporteur states that compared to the numerous aims of the European Union, common programmes are still underfinanced.
Vaja on keskenduda nendele valdkondadele, mis vajavad tõepoolest täiendavaid rahalisi vahendeid, ning aidata samal ajal tugevdada Euroopa majandust ja parandada Euroopa kodanike heaolu.
There is a need to focus on those areas, that are really in need of additional financial resources and at the same time to help strengthening the European economy and the comfort of the European citizens.
Ülemaailmse rahandus- ja majanduskriisi ajal, millele liikmesriigid reageerivad individuaalsete abimeetmetega, on Euroopa Parlamendi ülesandeks juhtida tähelepanu, et Euroopa Liidul on olulised ja pikaajalised jooksvad vahendid majanduskasvu edendamiseks, töökohtade loomiseks ning ühtekuuluvuse edendamiseks.
In time of a global financial and economic crisis, when the Member States respond with their individual aid measures, it is the role of the European Parliament to point out, that the European Union has important and long time running tools to promote economic growth and creation of jobs as well as cohesion.
See oleks halb sõnum, kui need abinõud, mis kujutavad endast ühtlasi liikmesriikidevahelist solidaarsust, jääksid riiklike lahenduste varju.
It would be a bad message if these tools, which also constitute solidarity among Member States, were overshadowed by national solutions.
Hiljutised ülemaailmsed väljakutsed näitasid, et EL ei suuda kiiresti tegutseda.
Recent global challenges showed that the EU is not able to act rapidly.
Ühtlasi on liidul raskusi nendele väljakutsetele reageerimisega ning seni on liit pakkunud selliseid lahendusi nagu majanduse taastamise kava, toiduainete hinnatõusu rahastamisvahend, Globaliseerumisega Kohanemise Fond ja koguni Solidaarsusfond.
At the same time it is struggling to answer these challenges, and so far has responded with solutions like the Economic Recovery Plan, the "food facility", the Globalisation Adjustment Fund or even the Solidarity Fund.
Euroopa Parlament peab tegutsema 2010. aasta eelarvemenetlusega seotud institutsioonilise ja õigusliku ebakindluse taustal.
The European Parliament has to act among institutional and legal uncertainties in the 2010 budgetary procedure.
2009. aasta valimised, komisjoni uus koosseis, Lissaboni lepingu ratifitseerimisprotsess, mitmeaastase finantsraamistiku (2007–2013) vahekokkuvõte on kõik erilised väljakutsed.
The 2009 elections, a new commission, the ratification process of the Lisbon Treaty, the mid-term review of the MFF 2007-13 are all special challenges.
Olukord on keeruline, kuid me saame tugineda finantsperioodi 2007–2013 esimeste aastate raportööride tööle.
The situation is difficult, but we can build upon the work of rapporteurs of the first years of the 2007-13 financial period.
James Elles, Kyösti Virrankoski ja Jutta Haug tundsid erilist vastutust, et eelarveassigneeringuid kasutataks väärtuste loomise vahendina (hinna ja kvaliteedi suhe, tulemustepõhine eelarve).
James Elles, Kyösti Virrankoski and Jutta Haug felt special responsibility to use budgetary appropriations as a tool to create values (value for money, budget of results).
Raportöör soovib nende silmapaistvate isikute tehtud tööd jätkata.
Your rapporteur would like to continue the work done by these outstanding personalities.
Me peame astuma sammukese edasi suunas, kus me suurendame peamiselt neid eelarveridu, kus ELi hinna ja kvaliteedi suhe on tasakaalus, ja võib-olla kärbime neid eelarveassigneeringuid, millel lisandväärtus või tulemused puuduvad.
We have to take a step forward in the direction, where we increase mainly those lines on which we get value for EU money and perhaps decrease those budgetary appropriations, which have no added value or result.
Iga-aastane poliitiline strateegia – juhtimisabinõu
Annual Policy Strategy - a Governance tool
2000. aastal tunnistas Euroopa Komisjon vajadust keskendada juhtimine enam tulemustele ning otsustas üle minna tegevuspõhisele juhtimisele.
In 2000, the European Commission acknowledged the need for management focusing more closely on results and decided to switch to the concept of activity-based management (ABM).
Sellel eesmärgil jaotas komisjon oma töö poliitilist tähtsust omavateks tegevusteks.
To that end, the Commission divided up its work into a set of politically meaningful "activities'.
Nagu parlament oli palunud, muutusid tegevused tänu tegevuspõhise juhtimise ellurakendamisele juhtimise keskseks osaks.
As the Parliament had asked for, with the introduction of ABM, the 'activities' became the central element of management.
Need tegevused on aluseks prioriteetide seadmisele, eesmärkide määratlemisele, vahendite eraldamisele ja haldamisele ning edusammude jälgimisele ja sellekohasele aruandlusele.
It is with respect to these activities that priorities are set, objectives defined, resources allocated and managed and performance monitored and reported on.
Komisjoni tööd kavandatakse ja selle kohta antakse aru iga-aastases poliitilises strateegias ja programmide koostamise ning aruandlustsük
The Commission’s work is planned and reported on in an annual strategic planning and programming and reporting
Eelarveaasta 2010 algas novembris/detsembris 2008 (aasta n-2) poliitikale suunatud aruteluga.
Concerning Budget year 2010, the cycle started in November/December 2008 (year n-2) with a policy oriented debate.
Komisjon langetab praegu talituste vastavate ettepanekute põhjal otsuse oma iga-aastase p
Based on the subsequent proposals of the services, the Commission is currently deciding upon its "A
oliitilise strateeg ia kohta, milles esitatakse 2010. aasta poliitika eesmärgid ning inimressursi ja rahaliste vahendite jaotamise suunad.
nnual Policy Strategy " (APS), which will set out the political priorities for 2010 and orientations for the allocation of human and financial resources.
Aasta strateegia, mille komisjon 18. või 25. veebruaril 2009 vastu võtab, loob raamistiku esialgsele eelarveprojektile ja komisjoni iga-aastasele tööprogrammile.
The annual strategy, to be adopted by the Commission on 18 or 25 February 2009, provides the framework for the preliminary draft budget (PDB) and for the Commission’s annual work programme.
Eelarve seisukohast on oluline, et aasta poliitiline strateegia
What is important from a budgetary aspect, is that one of the objectives of the APS
http://ec.europa.eu/budget/budget_detail/deciding_en.htm. võimaldaks võtta vastu eelarveraamistiku, milles prioriteetsed algatused, kui need on kindlaks määratud, saavad vajalikud rahastamisallikad.
http://ec.europa.eu/budget/budget_detail/deciding_en.htm is to allow the adoption of a budgetary framework, in which the priority initiatives, as identified, receive the necessary resources.
Komisjoni president esitab iga-aastase poliitilise strateegia Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule.
The President of the Commission presents the APS to the European Parliament and the Council.
Kolm institutsiooni astuvad seejärel struktureeritud dialoogi ning iga volinik peab arutelusid asjaomase parlamendikomisjoniga.
The three institutions then engage in a structured dialogue and each Commissioner has a discussion with the relevant parliamentary committee.
Dialoogi tulemuseks on alusdokument, mida kasutatakse
The result of this dialogue is a stock taking document which is used to prepare the
komisjoni järgmise aasta tööprogrammi koostamiseks.
Commission work programme for the following year.
Komisjoni tööprogrammiga muudetakse poliitiline strateegia konkreetseks tegevuskavaks ja nõudmiste kogumiks.
The Commission work programme translates policy strategy into a concrete action plan and a set of deliverables.
Euroopa Komisjon koostab seejärel mitmeaastast finantsraamistikku ja aasta poliitilist strateegiat arvesse võttes esialgse eelarveprojekti ning esitab selle aprilli lõpus või mai alguses (asutamislepingu artikli 272 lõike 3 kohaselt hiljemalt 1. septembril) nõukogule.
Taking into account the Multi-annual Financial Framework and the APS, the European Commission then prepares the PDB, and submits it to the Council at the end of April or early May ("on 1st September at the latest", pursuant to article 272, par 3 of the Treaty).
Iga-aastases poliitilises strateegias määratakse kindlaks nii eelarve- kui ka õigusloometsükli raamistik ja suunised.
The APS defines the framework and guidelines for both the budgetary and legislative cycles.
Pärast strateegia vastuvõtmist liigub tsükkel edasi ühest küljest eelarvemenetluse juurde (alates esialgse eelarveprojekti koostamisest) ja teisest küljest institutsioonidevahelise dialoogi (parlamendi ja nõukoguga) juurde.
Following adoption of the strategy, the cycle moves on to the budgetary procedure on the one hand (beginning with the preparation of the preliminary draft budget) and the inter-institutional dialogue (with Parliament and Council) on the other.
Eelarvekomisjon on aktiivselt toetanud parlamendis kindlaksmääratud prioriteete ning sellepärast toetab raportöör esiteks 2010. aasta eelarveprioriteetide seadmist eelarvekomisjoni poolt ja teiseks käesoleva dokumendi piisavalt varajast õigeaegset vastuvõtmist enne esialgset eelarveprojekti, nii et see aitaks tõhusalt kaasa prioriteetide kujundamisele ja täpsustamisele.
The committee on Budgets has been active in supporting the priorities that have been identified in Parliament and this is why your Rapporteur favours first, the drafting by the Budgets committee of the budgetary priorities for 2010 and, second, the “early enough” in time adoption before the PDB of this document, so that it contributes effectively to the shaping and concretisation of the priorities.
Menetluslikud aspektid ja ajakava
Procedural aspects and calendar
Esimeeste konverentsi järel ning parlamentaarse reformi töörühma
Following the decision by the Conference of Presidents based on the proposals of the Working Group on Parliamentary Reform
http://www.sib.ep.parl.union.eu/SIB/htmlDisplay.do?organ=CPG&type=WORKGROUP&noTitle=true. ettepanekute põhjal nähakse ette strateegilise arutelu toimumine pärast seda, kui komisjon esitab iga-aastase poliitilise strateegia, mis võetakse vastu veebruaris.
http://www.sib.ep.parl.union.eu/SIB/htmlDisplay.do?organ=CPG&type=WORKGROUP&noTitle=true , a strategic debate is foreseen to take place following Commission's presentation of the Annual Policy Strategy, which is to be adopted in February.
Kaks resolutsiooni tugevdavad kõnealust arutelu.
This debate is strengthened with two resolutions.
Üks on fraktsioonide resolutsioon komisjoni iga-aastase poliitilise strateegia kohta ja teine resolutsioon 2010. aasta eelarve suuniste kohta, mille koostab eelarvekomisjon.
One resolution by the political groups on "Commission's Annual Policy Strategy" and one on "Guidelines for Budget 2010" prepared by the Committee on Budgets.
· Võimalik ajakava resolutsioonile 2010. aasta eelarve suuniste kohta võiks olla järgmine:
· A possible calendar for the resolution on "Guidelines for Budget 2010" could be:
· 10.–11. veebruar: raporti projekti esitamine, millele järgneb muudatusettepanekute esitamise tähtaeg;
· 10/11 February: presentation of draft report, followed by a deadline for amendments
· 23.–24. veebruar: raporti projekti üle hääletamine komisjonis;
· 23/24 February: vote on the draft report in the Committee.
· märtsi I täiskogu (alternatiivina märtsi II täiskogu): resolutsiooni vastuvõtmine.
· March I Plenary (alternatively March II) Adoption of the resolution.
Raportöör soovib rõhutada erilist panust, mille EP võib anda oma eelarvealaste eelisõigustega ja mida ta saab teha õigel ajal.
Your Rapporteur wishes to underline the special contribution that EP can bring by its budgetary prerogatives and to do this in due time.
Resolutsioon tuleks eelistatavalt vastu võtta märtsi I täiskogul, et see annaks sobivaima sisendi komisjoni esialgsele eelarveprojektile, mis kava kohaselt võetakse vastu 29. aprillil.
The resolution should be adopted in plenary preferably March I, in order to have optimum input for the Commissions PDB, scheduled to be adopted on 29 April.
Valimisperioodi tõttu ei ole võimalik hääletada täiskogus resolutsiooni üle, milles kommenteeritakse esialgset eelarveprojekti ja määratakse kindlaks EP delegatsiooni mandaat juulikuiseks lepituseks.
Because of the electoral period, there will be no possibility to have a resolution voted in plenary, which comments the PDB and outlines EP’s delegation mandate for the July conciliation.
Varem on eriti valimiste toimumise aastatel eelarve lepitusmenetlust puudutava mandaadi raporti üle enne nõukogu esimest lugemist hääletatud ainult eelarvekomisjonis, mitte aga täiskogus.
In the past, particularly during electoral years, the mandate report concerning the budget conciliation procedure before the Council's first reading has been voted in the committee on Budgets only, and not by Plenary.
Viimaste aastate jooksul on eelarvekomisjon pannud erilist rõhku jätkuvale ja konstruktiivsele koostööle komisjonidega, pidades silmas nende prioriteetide lisamist järgmisse iga-aastasesse eelarvemenetlusse.
Over the past years the committee on Budgets has put particular emphasis on a continuous and constructive cooperation with the committees with a view to follow their priorities for the next annual budgetary procedure.
Vastavatele EP komisjonidele on juba saadetud kiri, kus neid kutsutakse nimetama oma eelarveraportöör ja pidama perioodilisi kohtumisi, millest esimene peaks toimuma veebruari alguses, enne kui komisjon esitab iga-aastase poliitilise strateegia.
A letter has already been sent to the specialised EP committees inviting them to appoint their budget rapporteurs and to hold regular meetings, the first being proposed for early February, before the presentation of the Annual Policy Strategy by the Commission.
Kõnealune koostöö muudetakse ametlikumaks käesoleval aastal, kuna esimeeste konverents otsustas 18. septembril 2008
This cooperation will be further formalized this year as the Conference of Presidents decided on 18 September 2008
V. 2010. aasta prioriteedid
V. Priorities for 2010
Raportöör kutsub liikmesriike andma oma panus parlamendikomisjonis toimuvasse arutellu, et alustada prioriteetide kujundamist, mis peaksid ELi järgmise aasta eelarves kajastuma.
The rapporteur invites Members to contribute at the debate in Committee so as to start shaping the priorities that should be embedded in next year's EU budget.
Paljud 2009. aasta eelarves käsitletud teemad vaadatakse läbi ja neid arendatakse edasi 2010. aasta eelarves ning käsitletakse ka uusi küsimusi:
Many of the topics addressed in the 2009 budget will be followed-up and further developed in the 2010 budget, also new issues will be addressed:
· Euroopa kodanike ohutus ja julgeolek, mis hõlmab paljusid aspekte, andes vastuse kõigile ELi kodanike hirmudele ja ebakindlusele;
· "Safety and security for European citizens" which covers many aspects providing an answer to all of the fears and uncertainties of EU citizens.
· struktuurifondid: rakendamise lihtsustamine ja kiirendamine 21. novembril 2008 toimunud lepituskohtumisel koostatud deklaratsiooni tulemusena;
· Structural funds: simplifying and accelerating implementation as a follow-up to the declaration reached at the conciliation meeting on 21 November 2008
· finantskavandamise vahendid – olemasolev varu – vahekokkuvõte;
· "Instruments for financial programming" - available margins - mid term review
· ELi välistegevusega seotud praegune olukord ja uued vajadused;
· State of play and new needs relating to EU's external action
· komisjoni personali- ja kinnisvarapoliitika sõelumine.
· Screening exercise on Commission staff and building policy
Eespool mainitud huvipakkuvad punktid moodustavad lisaks esialgset eelarveprojekti, eelarveprojekti ja ameteid puudutavatele menetluslikele töödokumentidele soovitusliku töödokumentide nimekirja, mis võimaldavad sügavamat uurimist ja arutelu.
The above mentioned points of interest constitute an indicative list of working documents, additional to the "procedural ones" on the PDB, DB and Agencies, which allow deeper examination and discussion.
TÖÖDOKUMENT NR 2 – EUROOPA KODANIKE OHUTUSE TAGAMISE VAHENDID
WORKING DOCUMENT NR 2 ON INSTRUMENTS OF SAFETY FOR EUROPEAN CITIZENS
Maailmas on Euroopat pikka aega peetud rahumeelseks ja stabiilseks kohaks, mida tunnustavad kõik globaalsed jõud.
For long years Europe had been considered to be a peaceful, stable place in the World, widely acknowledged by all the global powers.
Siiski ei saa vältida aja jooksul tekkinud ning stabiilsust ja heaolu varjutavaid probleeme, nagu kliimamuutused ja üleilmastumine, piiriülene organiseeritud kuritegevus ja terrorism.
However, through the passing time this stability and prosperity could not avoid being overshadowed by problems such as climate change and globalisation, organised trans-border crime and terrorism.