natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Seaduslikke õigusi omandile tuleb järgida.
Legitimate rights to property must be upheld.
Hispaanias 2004. aastal korraldatud esimese teabekogumiskülastuse aruandes kirjeldati juba põhjalikult seal toimuvat ja selle tagajärgi.
The report of the first fact-finding visit to Spain in 2004 already described in great detail what was going on and its implications.
Teise külastuse ajal läksid teatavad poliitikud ja arendajad, istudes samas koosolekuruumis külg külje kõrval, justkui rõhutamaks oma äärmist toetust, isegi nii kaugele, et süüdistasid kõnealuses olukorras petitsioonikomisjoni, kes oli süüdi investeeringute kaotamises Valencia piirkonnas, ja väljendasid seda üsna otse antud komisjoni delegatsiooni esindajatele.
During the second visit certain politicians and developers, sitting side by side in the same meeting room as if to emphasise their umbilical support, even went so far as to say that the situation was the fault of the Petitions Committee which was responsible for loss of investment in the Valencian region, and they said as much directly to the members of the Committee delegation.
Kolmanda külastuse ajal Valenciasse 2007. aastal jõudis jultumus haripunkti, kui delegatsiooni liikmetele öeldi, et saadud petitsioonid on petitsioonikomisjoni kollektiivse ettekujutuse vili.
During the third visit to Valencia in 2007, arrogance was at its height, and members of the delegation were told that the petitions received were fabrications of the Committee's collective imagination.
Jaanuaris oli mul võimalik arutada seda teemat avameelselt Valencia asjaomase nõunikuga, kuid riigi tasandil osutus arutelu võimatuks.
In January I was able to discuss the issue frankly with the Valencian minister responsible though at national level this proved not to be possible.
Ei ole ilmselt kokkusattumus, et paralleelselt petitsioonikomisjoni jätkuvate uuringutega on uuringuid teostanud ka Hispaania õigus- ja täitevasutused.
It is perhaps no coincidence that in parallel to the Committee's ongoing investigations the Spanish judicial and enforcement authorities have also been conducting their inquiries.
Kõigile teada tulemus on peaaegu lõputu nimekiri kohalikest poliitikutest ja ametnikest nii Hispaania mandriosas kui saartel, kes on võetud vahi alla korruptsioonisüüdistuste alusel, mis on seotud viimastel aastatel sõlmitud massiliste linnaehitustehingutega.
The result has been, as we all know, an almost endless list of local politicians and officials on mainland Spain and on the islands who have been arrested on corruption charges related to the massive urbanisation deals which have been concluded in the recent period.
Laialt on teada fakt, et viimasel kümnendil on Hispaanias elamuehituses kasutatud rohkem tsementi ja betooni kui Prantsusmaal, Saksamaal ja Ühendkuningriigis kokku.
The fact that more cement and concrete have been used to build homes in Spain during the last decade than in France, Germany and the UK combined has become a well known fact.
See tragöödia on muidugi varju heitnud väärtuslikule argumendile, mida on kasutanud paljud inimesed, kes komisjoni uuringute suhtes kriitilised on.
This tragedy has of course hidden a valid point made by many people who are critical of the Committee's investigations.
See argument on, et loomulikult mitte kõik kohalikud ametiasutused ei ole korrumpeerunud ega sattunud kiusatusse teenida kergelt rahalist kasu.
That is that, of course, not all local authorities are corrupt, not all have fallen into the honey-trap of easy financial gain.
Paljud on tegutsenud vastutustundeliselt, enamikke kohalikke linnapeasid huvitab üksnes oma kogukondade heaolu; kuid kurb fakt on see, et ka nemad on olnud massilise linnaehituse ohvrid.
Many have acted responsibly, most local mayors only have the interests of their communities at heart; but the sad fact is that they have also become the victims of massive urbanisation.
Paljud ehitussektori liikmed, kellega raportöör on kohtunud, on samuti suurimate osalejate jõukusele ja poliitilisele võimule peetava tormijooksu ohvrid.
Many members of the building industry, with whom your Rapporteur has held meetings, are also victims of the rush to wealth and political power of the biggest players.
Kahtlemata on lõpuks säästval viisil, kooskõlas kohalike vajaduste ja tagasihoidlikumate, kuid siiski keskkonnasõbralike eesmärkidega, tegutsevad väiksemad ehitusettevõtjad need, kes kerkivad esile, et sektorit uuendada, kui korra- ja reguleerimismehhanismid kehtestatakse ja neid järgitakse.
It will no doubt be the rather smaller building companies who act in a sustainable manner, in association with local requirements and more modest yet environmentally sound objectives who will ultimately emerge to regenerate the industry when once order and regulatory mechanisms are established and respected.
Petisioonikomisjoni käsutuses on sadu uuringuid üksikjuhtumite kohta, mis sisalduvad petitsioonide esitajate saadetud dokumentides.
The Petitions Committee has hundreds of individual case studies contained in the documents submitted by petitioners.
Need hõlmavad üsna mitmesuguseid konkreetseid situatsioone, nagu võib näha käesolevale raportile lisatud tabelist.
They cover a rather wide variety of specific situations as can be seen in the table which is annexed to this report.
Enamiku petitsioone on esitanud üksikisikud konkreetse kogukonna elanike nimel; teistel on laiem toetuspind, mõned petitsioonid on väga kaitsetutelt eakatelt inimestelt, kes tunnevad muret, et nende eluaegsed säästud, mille nad on investeerinud pensionile minnes oma kodusse, võivad minna hoolimatute ja vastutustundetute kohalike vahendajate kätte.
Most petitions have been submitted by individuals on behalf of the residents of a particular community; others have a wider basis of support, some are from very vulnerable elderly persons who feel afraid that their life savings, invested in their retirement home, is to be swallowed up by unscrupulous and irresponsible local dealers.
Petitsioonikomisjon on püüdnud neid petitsioone liigitada, et neil, kellel on võim lahendusi leida, olgu lahendused siis juriidilised või poliitilised, oleks kergem identifitseerida probleeme, millega Euroopa kodanikud silmitsi seisavad.
The Petitions Committee has tried to categorise these petitions in order to make the problems faced by European citizens more easily identifiable to those with the power to deliver solutions, whether the remedy be legal or political.
Oma resolutsioonis on antud komisjon välja pakkunud teatavaid võimalusi, mida võiks uurida, et tagada Euroopa kodanikele maa sundvõõrandamisest tuleneva kahju nõuetekohane hüvitamine.
It has, in the resolution suggested certain avenues which could be explored in order to ensure that European citizens are properly compensated for their losses as a result of the land-grab which has been practised.
Komisjon on nõudnud ennetavate meetmete kehtestamist.
It has called for preventive measures to be established.
Ettevaatusprintsiip peab reguleerima kõigi programmide keskkonnamõju hindamisi.
The precautionary principle must govern the environmental impact assessment of all programmes.
Eelkõige nõuab antud komisjon rohkem õiguskindlust ja seaduslike kinnisvaraomanike ja nende õiguste suuremat austamist.
Above all it is calling for more legal certainty and greater respect for legitimate property owners and their rights.
Taastada tuleb usaldus Hispaania kohtusüsteemi vastu, eelkõige nende avalduste valguses, mille tegid Valencia advokatuuri mõjukad liikmed, kes väljendasid selgelt, et massilise linnaehituse ohvrite jaoks ei ole ühtegi õiguskaitsevahendit.
Confidence in the Spanish judicial system needs to be restored particularly in the light of statements made by prominent members of the Valencian Bar who said clearly that there was no legal remedy for victims of massive urbanisation.
See on nii kodanike kui omavalitsuste huvides.
This is in the interests of citizens and municipalities alike.
Petitsioonikomisjon nõuab täpsema teabe avaldamist ning kõigi arenduste läbipaistvamaks muutmist, kus valitseks selgus kinnisvaraomanikele tulenevate tagajärgede osas.
It is calling for more precise information to be made available and for all developments to be made more transparent with the implications for property owners made clear.
Kui tekivad kulud, peavad need olema õigustatud ja mõistlikud; mitte meelevaldsed, nagu see praegu liiga sageli on.
Where charges are to be incurred these must be justifiable and reasonable; not arbitrary, which is too often the case at the moment.
Kedagi ei tohiks jätta ilma maa või koduta nõuetekohase menetluse ning küllaldase ja õiglase hüvitiseta, kooskõlas Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohtu kohtuotsustega, mida kõik liikmesriigid peavad Euroopa Liidu lepingu artikli 6 lõike 2 kohaselt järgima.
No person should be deprived of their land or their homes without due process and adequate and proper compensation, in conformity with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights which all Member States are bound to respect under Article 6(2) of the Treaty on the European Union.
Petitsioonikomisjon palub Hispaania pädevatel ametiasutustel vaadata õigusaktid uuesti läbi ja neid vajaduse korral muuta, et tagada kinnisvaraomanikele asutamislepingus nende kohta sätestatud õigused, ja tühistada kõik arendused, milles ei järgita või ei kohaldata ELi õigust.
The Committee asks the responsible authorities in Spain to look again and eventually revise legislation where necessary to guarantee the rights contained in the Treaty for property owners, and to cancel all developments where EU law is not respected or applied.
Käesolevas resolutsioonis tsiteeritakse Hispaania põhiseaduse paragrahvi 33; samas ei ole selle sätted selgelt määratletud selles osas, kuidas põhiseaduskohus neid seoses massiliste linnaehitusprojektidega kohaldab.
Article 33 of the Spanish Constitution is cited in the resolution; yet its provisions have not been clearly defined in their application by the Constitutional Court as they apply to massive urbanisation projects.
Kõik uued linnaarenduskavad, milles ei järgita keskkonna säästmist ja sotsiaalset vastutust ning seaduslike kinnisvaraomanike õigusi, tuleks peatada ja läbi vaadata.
New urbanisation plans which do not respect environmental sustainability and social responsibility and the rights of legitimate property owners should be suspended and reviewed.
Kinnisvaraarendajate roll ja tingimused, mille alusel kohalikud ametiasutused on neile pakkumised andnud, on olnud mitmete petitsioonide teema ning on Euroopa Kohtus praegu arutlusel olevate rikkumismenetluste teema.
The role of the urbanising agent and the conditions under which tenders have been granted to them by local authorities has been the subject of many petitions and is currently the subject of infringement proceedings before the European Court of Justice.
Seetõttu ei tee raportöör selles küsimuses rohkem tähelepanekuid, välja arvatud see, et petitsioonikomisjon on Euroopa Komisjoni tegevust täielikult toetanud, mida on teinud ka paljud petitsioonide esitajad.
For that reason your rapporteur will not comment any further except to say that the Committee has supported the European Commission fully with this action as have many petitioners.
Petitsioonikomisjon mõistab ja toetab Hispaania ametiasutuste püüdlusi säilitada rannikukeskkond ja võimaluse korral see taastada.
The Committee understands and supports the Spanish authorities in their attempts to preserve and where possible restore the coastal environment.
Ta ei mõista, miks on praeguses etapis võetud taas kasutusse 1988. aasta rannikuseadus, kui seda praktiliselt ei kasutatud 30 aastat, mil leidis aset nii suur laastamine.
What it fails to understand is why the 1988 Coastal Law has been resurrected at this stage, in this time, when it has been in practical abeyance for thirty years when so much devastation took place.
Miks on selle seaduse kohaldamine nii kaootiline ja meelevaldne, miks lammutatakse maha traditsioonilisi elamuid rannikul ja lubatakse uute modernsete korterelamute ehitamist?
Why is its application such a shambles and so arbitrary when traditional coastal housing is being demolished and newly developed modern apartments being tolerated?
Miks inimestel lubati sellist kinnisvara viimase 30 aasta jooksul osta, järgides kõiki asjaomaseid juriidilisi nõudeid, kui nüüd tuleb neil kokku puutuda seadusega, millel on tagasiulatuv mõju ning mis jätab nad ilma seadusliku omandiõigusega seotud õigustest?
Why were people allowed to buy such property during the last thirty years, respecting all the legal requirements with which they were faced, only to be confronted today with a law with retro-active effect which denies them the rights associated with legitimate ownership?
On mõistlik, et karistada tuleks spekulante ja kinnisvaraarendajaid, kellel olid õigusvahendid, et olukorraga kursis olla; ei tohi olla nii, et inimesed, kes ostsid heas usus oma vara, järgides kõiki nendele seatud nõudeid, kaotaksid oma õigused, samuti nende perede ja järeltulijate õigused oma kodudele.
That speculators and property developers who had the legal resources to know better should be penalised is reasonable; what is not is that people who have bought their property in good faith respecting all the demands made upon them should lose their rights, and that of their families and descendents to their homes.
Euroopa Komisjon võib kasutada rikkumismenetlust, et tagada, et liikmesriik täidaks talle asutamislepingutest või ELi direktiividest tulenevaid kohustusi.
The European Commission may use the infringement procedure to ensure the compliance of a Member State with its responsibilities under the Treaties or under the terms of EU Directives.
Euroopa Parlament, kelle käsutuses ei ole seda vahendit, võib, nõuetekohaselt õigustatud juhtudel, kasutada eelarvepädevust, et saavutada sarnaseid tulemusi, kui ta otsustab seda teha.
The European Parliament, which does not have this weapon at its disposal, may, in duly justifiable cases, use its budgetary authority to achieve similar ends if it decides to do so.
Piisab sellest, kui öelda, et praegu on palju näiteid, kus massilises linnaehituses on üldise programmi raames kasutatud ELi rahastamise elemente uute infrastruktuuride jaoks, mis võimaldab parlamendil ja eelarvekontrollikomisjonil uurida selliseid juhtumeid täpsemalt, kui petitsioonide esitajate poolt Euroopa Parlamendile tõstatatud küsimustele lahenduste leidmisel edusamme ei tehta.
Suffice it to say at this stage that there are many instances where massive urbanisation has incorporated elements of EU funding for new infrastructure into the overall programme to allow the Parliament, and its Budgetary Control Committee, to look into such cases more closely if progress is not made to resolve the issues raised by the petitioners with the European Parliament.
Raportöörina loomulikult loodan, et selle meetme kohaldamine ei ole vajalik.
As rapporteur I naturally very much hope that this will not be necessary.
by Mr. Federico Arrizabalaga Moreno (Spanish), on behalf of Residentes Montañeta S.Jose - Oropesa, on alleged abuses by local authorities in connection with the urban development plans in Montañeta S.Jose - Oropesa
by Mr. Federico Arrizabalaga Moreno (Spanish), on behalf of Residentes Montañeta S.Jose - Oropesa, on alleged abuses by local authorities in connection with the urban development plans in Montañeta S.Jose - Oropesa
by Mr. Javier Sanchis Marco (Spanish), on lack of measures for the protection of the environment in Masalaves (Valencia) in connection with the activity of a local brick factory
by Mr. Javier Sanchis Marco (Spanish), on lack of measures for the protection of the environment in Masalaves (Valencia) in connection with the activity of a local brick factory
by Mr. José Morales Roselló (Spanish), on his personal experience with one of the well-known developers in Valencia (Spain)
by Mr. José Morales Roselló (Spanish), on his personal experience with one of the well-known developers in Valencia (Spain)
by Mr. Diego de Ramón Hernández (Spanish), on behalf of Unión Democrática Región de Murcia, on the need to control excessive urbanization plans in Murcia
by Mr. Diego de Ramón Hernández (Spanish), on behalf of Unión Democrática Región de Murcia, on the need to control excessive urbanization plans in Murcia
by Mr. Allan Gulliver (British), on behalf of Valle Romano, on unjust charges for new infrastructure in Estepona (Spain)
by Mr. Allan Gulliver (British), on behalf of Valle Romano, on unjust charges for new infrastructure in Estepona (Spain)
Petition 0513/2007 by Mr. José-Domingo López Manchón (Spanish), on behalf of Grup Ecologista Maigmó (GREMA), on the incorporation of a public property road in the urbanization project "Valle de Sabinar" (Alicante, Spain)
Petition 0513/2007 by Mr. José-Domingo López Manchón (Spanish), on behalf of Grup Ecologista Maigmó (GREMA), on the incorporation of a public property road in the urbanization project "Valle de Sabinar" (Alicante, Spain)
Petition 0515/2007 by Ms. Odorinda Tena Llorens (Spanish), bearing 4 signatures, on problems related to the approval of the Marina d'Or-Golf project (Castellon, Spain)
Petition 0515/2007 by Ms. Odorinda Tena Llorens (Spanish), bearing 4 signatures, on problems related to the approval of the Marina d'Or-Golf project (Castellon, Spain)
Petition 0516/2007 by Ms. Liliane Rocher (Spanish), on behalf of Asociación de Vecinos Partida Pitchell, on detrimental environmental effects of the Revised Urban Development Plan of Peniscola (Castellón) on the Serra d'Irta protected area
Petition 0516/2007 by Ms. Liliane Rocher (Spanish), on behalf of Asociación de Vecinos Partida Pitchell, on detrimental environmental effects of the Revised Urban Development Plan of Peniscola (Castellón) on the Serra d'Irta protected area
by Mr. Pedro Garcia Moreno (Spanish), on behalf of Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste (ANSE), on alleged breaches of EC environmental legislation by regional and local authorities in the Autonomous Community of Murcia (Spain)
by Mr. Pedro Garcia Moreno (Spanish), on behalf of Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste (ANSE), on alleged breaches of EC environmental legislation by regional and local authorities in the Autonomous Community of Murcia (Spain)
by Mr. Jose Rodriguez Hernandez and Ms. María Belmonte Núnez (Spanish) on expropriation and illegal demolition of their house as result of the approval of an urban development plan in Calpe (Alicante)
by Mr. Jose Rodriguez Hernandez and Ms. María Belmonte Núnez (Spanish) on expropriation and illegal demolition of their house as result of the approval of an urban development plan in Calpe (Alicante)
by Mr. David Chervin (French), on urban abuses resulting in the expropriation of his land in Polop de la Marina (Alicante, Spain)
by Mr. David Chervin (French), on urban abuses resulting in the expropriation of his land in Polop de la Marina (Alicante, Spain)
by Ms. Francisca Talens Sapina (Spanish), on breaches of her property rights and of EC public procurement legislation in connection with the implementation of the urban development plan of Cullera (Valencia) adopted on the basis of the LRAU (Ley Reguladora de Actividades Urbanisticas)
by Ms. Francisca Talens Sapina (Spanish), on breaches of her property rights and of EC public procurement legislation in connection with the implementation of the urban development plan of Cullera (Valencia) adopted on the basis of the LRAU (Ley Reguladora de Actividades Urbanisticas)
by Ms. Jennifer Harvey (British), on problems with her property in Spain
by Ms. Jennifer Harvey (British), on problems with her property in Spain
by Mrs. Esther Morales Valero (French), on alleged urban abuse resulting from the implementation of the General Urban Development Plan (PGOU) 2005 of Santa Pola
by Mrs. Esther Morales Valero (French), on alleged urban abuse resulting from the implementation of the General Urban Development Plan (PGOU) 2005 of Santa Pola
by Mr. Jose Ortega (Spanish), on the alleged abusive application of the Spanish law of the coasts in relation to property rights
by Mr. Jose Ortega (Spanish), on the alleged abusive application of the Spanish law of the coasts in relation to property rights
by Mr. Alberto Mayor Barajona (Spanish), on behalf of Ecologistas en Acción (Guadalajara), on alleged breaches of EC environmental legislation in connection with the approval of an urban development project concerning Vega del Henares area (Castilla-La Mancha)
by Mr. Alberto Mayor Barajona (Spanish), on behalf of Ecologistas en Acción (Guadalajara), on alleged breaches of EC environmental legislation in connection with the approval of an urban development project concerning Vega del Henares area (Castilla-La Mancha)
by Ms. E. W.(British), on problems with the house she purchased in Murcia (Spain)
by Ms. E. W.(British), on problems with the house she purchased in Murcia (Spain)
by Ms. Karin Koberling (German), on alleged abusive application of the law of the coast by the Spanish authorities
by Ms. Karin Koberling (German), on alleged abusive application of the law of the coast by the Spanish authorities
Hr Marcin LIBICKI
Mr Marcin LIBICKI
Teema: Arvamus kirja vormis raporti kohta, mis käsitleb Hispaania ulatusliku linnaehituse mõju Euroopa kodanike õigustele, keskkonnale ja ELi õiguse kohaldamisele (saadud petitsioonide põhjal) (petitsioonid 00/00 ja 00/00)
Subject: Opinion in the form of a letter on the draft report on the impact of extensive urbanization in Spain on individual rights of European citizens, on the environment and on the application of EU law, based upon petitions received (Petitions 00/00 and 00/00 ) ( 2008/2248(INI) )
Austatud hr Libicki
Dear Mr Libicki,
Õiguskomisjonil on eespool nimetatud raporti projekti teatavate, rangelt õiguslike aspektide kohta järgmised tähelepanekud.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has the following observations to make on certain strictly legal aspects of the draft report cited above.
Petitsioonikomisjoni raportööri koostatud raporti projektis esineb siseriikliku õiguse ulatuse ja kohaldatavuse osas teatavat vääritimõistmist, mis võib lugejaid eksitada, pannes neid ülehindama seda, mida Euroopa Liit saab teha juhtudel, kui liikmesriik või riiklikud ametiasutused on väidetavalt rikkunud Euroopa inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste kaitse konventsioonis ja Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartas sätestatud põhiõigusi.
The draft report drawn up by the rapporteur of the Petitions Committee contains certain misconceptions as to the scope and applicability of national law which are liable to mislead its readers into overestimating what the European Union can do in cases where a Member State or national authorities have allegedly acted in breach of fundamental rights as set out in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union .
Selleks et ühenduse institutsioonid (komisjon, Euroopa Kohus) saaksid sellistel puhkudel liikmesriigi vastu tegutseda, peab põhiõiguse rikkumine olema seostatav ühenduse pädevuse teostamisega.
In order for the Community institutions (the Commission, the Court of Justice) to be able to act against a Member State in such circumstances, the violation of a fundamental right must be referable to the exercise of Community competence.
Üksnes asjaolu, et mõned inimesed, kes kandsid eeldatavalt kahju Euroopa inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste kaitse konventsioonis ja põhiõiguste hartas sätestatud põhiõiguse väidetava rikkumise tõttu, olid kasutanud ühenduse vaba liikumise ja asutamisõigust, ei ole piisav selle küsimuse toomiseks ühenduse pädevusse.
The mere fact that some of the persons who purportedly suffered injury as a result of an alleged infringement of a fundamental right enshrined in the ECHR and the Charter had exercised their Community rights of free movement or freedom of establishment does not suffice to bring the matter within the jurisdiction of the Community.
Seoses väidetava omandiõiguse rikkumisega (Euroopa inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste kaitse konventsiooni esimese lisaprotokolli artikkel 1) ei suudeta raporti projektis näidata mingit seost ühenduse õigusega.
As regards the alleged breach of the right to property (Article 1 of the first Additional Protocol to the ECHR), the draft report fails to show any connection whatsoever with Community law.