natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eespool nimetatud põhjustel kritiseerib Euroopa Parlament piisava demokraatliku kontrolli, läbipaistvuse ja aruandekohusluse puudumist nimetatud organi puhul nii liikmesriikide kui ka Euroopa tasandil.
However, for the reasons stated above, the European Parliament criticises the lack of sufficient democratic control, transparency and accountability of this body at both national and European levels.
Raportöör toetab igati Europoli organisatsiooni ja töösüsteemide reformimist viisil, mis annab Euroopa Parlamendile vajalikud vahendid Europoli tegevuse järelevalveks, et tagada demokraatlik kontroll, mille läbiviimine on meie institutsiooni ülesanne .
Your rapporteur strongly argues for the reform of the organisation and working system of Europol in such a way that will provide the European Parliament with the necessary instruments to supervise Europol activities to guarantee the democratic control that our institution is there to secure.
Nimetatud põhjusel ja kooskõlas Euroopa Parlamendi väljakujunenud tavaga teeb raportöör ettepaneku lükata tagasi algatus, milles käesoleval juhul Euroopa Parlamendiga konsulteeritakse.
It is for this reason, and in keeping with the Parliament’s established practice, that your rapporteur proposes the rejection of the initiative on which the Parliament is being consulted here.
Austria Vabariigi algatus eesmärgiga võtta vastu nõukogu akt, millega muudetakse Europoli personalieeskirju
Initiative by the Republic of Austria with a view to the adoption of a Council Act amending Europol's Staff Regulaions
I jagu — Euroopa Parlament
Section I – European Parliament
EUROOPA PARLAMENDI RESOLUTSIOONI ETTEPANEK
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION 5
Euroopa Liidu 2004. eelarveaasta üldeelarve (I jagu – Euroopa Parlament) täitmisele heakskiidu andmise kohta
on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section I – European Parliament
- võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi eelarve täitmise sise-eeskirja
– having regard to Article 13 of the Internal Rules for the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget
Bur/ann/fin - PE349.540. artiklit 13;
Bur/ann/fin - PE 349.540. ,
- võttes arvesse kodukorra V lisa artikli 5 lõike 1 punkti a teist lõiku;
– having regard to Article 5(1)(a), second subparagraph, of Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
- võttes arvesse eelarvekontrollikomisjoni raportit ( A6-0119/2006 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0119/2006 ),
– võttes arvesse eelarvekontrollikomisjoni ülalmainitud raporti hääletuse tulemust 27. aprilli 2006. aasta täiskogul, mis heakskiidu andmise ülekaaluka enamusega (3 häält vastuvõtmise poolt, 591 vastu ja 13 erapooletut) raportööri soovitusel tagasi lükkas, mistõttu heakskiidu andmine loetakse kodukorra V lisa artikli 5 lõike 1 punkti a teise lõigu kohaselt edasilükatuks
– having regard to the result of the vote in plenary on 27 April 2006 on the above report of the Committee on Budgetary Control, rejecting discharge by an overwhelming majority (three votes for, 591 against and 13 abstentions), at the rapporteur’s request, as a result of which, under Article 5(1)(a), second subparagraph, of Annex V of the Rules of Procedure, discharge is deemed to be postponed
Vastuvõetud tekstid, P6_TA(2006)0158 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0158 . ,
- võttes arvesse eelarvekontrollikomisjoni teist raportit ( A6-0280/2006 ),
– having regard to the second report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0280/2006 ),
A. arvestades, et, kontrollikoda juhtis tähelepanu järelevalve- ja kontrollisüsteemide puudustele (kontrollikoja aastaaruande punkt 9.16), mis olid siiski enamasti formaalset laadi; arvestades, et kontrollikoja hinnangul ei mõjutanud vead olulisel määral halduskulude aluseks olevate tehingute seaduslikkust ja korrakohasust (aastaaruande punkt 9.27);
A. whereas the Court of Auditors pointed to weaknesses in supervisory and control systems (paragraph 9.16 of the Court's Annual Report), albeit mostly of a formal nature; whereas, according to the Court, the errors did not materially affect the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying administrative expenditure (paragraph 9.27 of the Court's Annual Report),
B. arvestades, et finantsmäärus ja parlamendi kodukord 23. oktoobril 2002
B. whereas the Financial Regulation and the Rules of Procedure of Parliament as amended on 23 October 2002
3. teeb presidendile ülesandeks edastada käesolev otsus ja resolutsioon, mis on selle lahutamatu osa, nõukogule, komisjonile, Euroopa Kohtule, kontrollikojale ja Euroopa ombudsmanile ning korraldada nende avaldamine Euroopa Liidu Teatajas (L-seeria).
Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the resolution that forms an integral part of it, to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors and the European Ombudsman and to have them published in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
– võttes arvesse kodukorra V lisa artikli 5 lõike 1 punkti a teist lõiku;
– having regard to Article 5(1)(a), second subparagraph, of Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
Vastuvõetud tekstid, P6_TA(2006)0158 . ;
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0158 . ,
Euroopa Parlamendi aruandlus
The European Parliament’s accounts
kasutada olevad assigneeringud
Appropriations available
3. nendib, et 2004. aastal seoti 97,76% parlamendi eelarvesse kirjendatud assigneeringutest (tühistamismäär 2,24%) ja saavutati nagu eelnevatelgi aastatel väga kõrge eelarve täitmise tase;
Notes that, in 2004, 97.76% of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed, with a cancellation rate of 2.24%, and that, as in previous years, a very high level of budget implementation was achieved;
5. nendib, et Euroopa Parlamendi tulud 2004. aastal olid 117 409 824 eurot (2003: 98 545 334 eurot);
Notes that, in 2004, Parliament received revenue amounting to EUR 117 409 824 (2003: EUR 98 545 334);
Parlamendi kinnisvarapoliitika rõhuasetusega Winston Churchilli (WIC) ja Salvador de Madariaga (SDM) hoonetel
Parliament’s property policy, focusing on the Winston Churchill (WIC) and Salvador de Madariaga (SDM) Buildings
WICi ja SDMi hooned
WIC and SDM Buildings
12. avaldab sügavat kahetsust, et hoolimata eelarvekontrollipädevusest sai komisjon nimetatud korraldusega seotud väidetest teadlikuks ajakirjanduse ja mitte Euroopa Parlamendi administratsiooni või juhatuse vahendusel, nagu oleks pidanud eeldama, sest mõlemad teadsid väidetest mitu nädalat;
Strongly regrets that, despite its competence on Budgetary Control, the Committee only became aware of the allegations relating to the said arrangements from media reports rather than, as should have been expected, from the administration or from the Bureau of the European Parliament, both of which had been fully aware of the allegations for several weeks;
16. tuletab meelde SCI Erasme'i ja Strasbourgi vahelise rendilepingu olemasolu, mis lõpeb 2010. aastal; arvab kindlasti, et kui Euroopa Parlament otsustab WICi ja SDMi hooned osta, ei saa ülalmainitud lepingul olla parlamendi jaoks rahalisi tagajärgi; seetõttu leiab, et sel juhul tuleks lepingu kehtivus lõpetada;
Recalls the existence of the rental agreement between SCI Erasme and Strasbourg, which expires in 2010; feels strongly that when the EP decides to purchase the WIC/SDM buildings, the aforementioned agreement cannot in any way have financial consequences for the Parliament; finds therefore that in that case the agreement should cease to exist;
– rendileping, mille alusel Euroopa Parlament kaht nimetatud hoonet rendib, sisaldab kolmepoolset suhet Euroopa Parlamendi enda kui WICi ja SDMi hoonete rentija, Strasbourgi linna kui rendileandja ning SCI Erasme'i kui erainvestori ja hoonete omaniku vahel;
– The lease agreement by virtue of which the European Parliament leases the said two buildings involves a triangular relationship between, on the one part, the Parliament itself as the lessee of the WIC and SDM buildings, on the second part, the City of Strasbourg as the lessor and on the third part, SCI Erasme as the private investor and owner of the buildings;
– miski ei viita sellele, et rendi- ja lisalepingute sõlmimisel ja rakendamisel oleks olnud ebaseaduslikke toiminguid, kuigi samas püsib kahtlus, kas finantsmääruses sätestatud "usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise" põhimõtet on täielikult järgitud;
– there appear to be no indications that there have been unlawful actions in the process of concluding and applying the leases and additional agreements, although there are nevertheless doubts on whether the principle of “sound financial management” enshrined in the Financial Regulation has been fully respected;
– ei ole täiesti usaldusväärset alust WICi ja SDMi hoonete sobiva renditasu sätestamiseks, kui parlament on ainus võimalik rentija nagu Strasbourgis; sel juhul ei ole asjakohane ka võrdlus bürooruumide maksumusega eri riikides ja linnades; mõistetavalt muudab see käesoleval juhul raskeks "õiglase rendihinna" kehtestamise ja seega ka hindamise, kas Euroopa Parlament on aastate jooksul tõesti õiglast renti maksnud;
– there is no absolutely reliable basis for setting an appropriate rent for the WIC and SDM buildings once Parliament is the only potential client, as in Strasbourg; nor is a comparison with the cost of office space in various countries and cities adequate in this case; understandably, this made it difficult to establish a “fair price” for the rent in question and therefore to assess whether the Parliament had been paying a truly fair rent over the years;
– aastate jooksul tõusnud renditasude peamine põhjus on see, et parlamendi otsuseid tegevad organid nõustusid 1985. aastal Strasbourgi linna ettepanekuga aastased summad indekseerida, eirates kvestorite ja eelarvekomisjoni lahkarvamusi 1980. aastast;
– a fundamental reason for the fact that rents have been rising for years is that, in 1985 the Parliament's decision-making bodies agreed to the City of Strasbourg's proposal to index-link the annual amounts, disregarding dissenting opinions delivered in 1980 by the Quaestors and the Committee on Budgets;
– märkimisväärne erinevus on nende summade vahel, mida parlament maksab rendina WICi ja SDMi hoonete kasutamise eest Strasbourgi linnale ja mida Strasbourgi linn maksab igakuiste tagasimaksetena erainvestorile: parlamendi administratsiooni arvestuste kohaselt on pärast investeerimiskulude ja teostatud tööde kulude mahaarvamist lepingu 25-aastase kehtivusaja jooksul makstud lisasummasid vähemalt 32 miljoni euro ulatuses; praegu, kui Strasbourgi linna ja SCI-Erasme’i lisateave veel puudub, ei saa välistada, et lisamaksed võivad ulatuda ka 46 miljoni euroni (siseaudit) või kuni 60 miljoni euroni (välisaudit).
– there is a considerable difference between, on the one hand, the rent it pays to the City of Strasbourg for use of the WIC and SDM Buildings and, on the other, the monthly repayments by the City of Strasbourg to the private investor: according to its Administration's calculations, the additional amounts paid over the 25 years of the lease, after deduction of the investment cost and the cost of works carried out, amount to at least EUR 32 m; at this point in time, pending further information from the City of Strasbourg and SCI Erasme, it cannot be ruled out that the additional payments might also total at least EUR 46 m (internal audit) or just under EUR 60 m (external audit);
– alles 2006. aasta märtsis sai ilmseks, et parlamendi renditasud Strasbourgi linnale ületavad linna tagasimakseid erainvestorile; selle ajani oletas Euroopa Parlament ekslikult, et tema renditasud Strasbourgi linnale edastati täies mahus SCI Erasme'ile, kuigi tegelikult see nii ei olnud;
– not until March 2006 were there indications that its rental payments to the City of Strasbourg exceeded the latter’s repayments to the private investor; until then, Parliament wrongly assumed that its rental payments to the City of Strasbourg were passed on in full to SCI Erasme when, in fact, this was not the case;
– kogu selle pika aja vältel ei kahelnud parlamendi administratsioon kunagi, et renditasud moodustavad "õiglase rendi", ega kontrollinud kordagi, kas tema renditasud edastati täies mahus SCI Erasme'ile, kuid ka Strasbourgi linn ei teavitanud teda sellest kordagi;
– throughout this long period of time, the Parliament’s Administration never questioned whether the rent payments constituted “fair rent” and never verified whether its lease payments were being passed on in full to the SCI Erasme but nor was it ever informed about this matter by the City of Strasbourg itself;
– ainult Strasbourgi linn teadis kahe erineva lepingulise suhte olemasolust kolme osalise vahel ja vaid Strasbourgi linn on olnud teadlik kahe summa vahelisest erinevusest alates 1981. aastast;
– only the City of Strasbourg knew of the existence of two different contractual relationships between the three parties involved and only the City of Strasbourg had been aware of the difference between the two amounts since 1981;
– Strasbourgi linn teavitas parlamendi administratsiooni 29. novembril 2005. aastal saadetud kirjas, et läbirääkimised erainvestoriga ei ole lõppenud; hiljemalt siis oleks parlamendi administratsioon pidanud mõistma, et Strasbourgi linn ja erainvestor on läbirääkimisi pidanud;
– Parliament’s Administration was notified by letter of 29 November 2005 by the City of Strasbourg that negotiations with the private investor had not been ended; at that point, at the latest, Parliament’s Administration should have realised that there had been negotiations between the City of Strasbourg and the private investor;
– renditasu, mida parlament oma hoonete eest maksab, peaks katma ehitus-, ülalpidamis- ja kasutuskulud, aga mingil juhul ei tohiks see sisaldada kasumimarginaali võõrustajariigi või selle kohalike või piirkondlike omavalitsuste jaoks; samuti on tavaks, et riik annab talle kuuluvad maad ELi institutsiooni käsutusse tasuta ja piiranguteta; tuleb siiski möönda, et midagi eelnevast ei olnud lepinguga sätestatud, heade suhete tõttu Strasbourgi linnavalitsuse kui eeldatavalt kasumit mittetaotleva avaliku asutusega; peale selle pole õigusnorme, mis keelaksid riigil või kohalikul või piirkondlikul omavalitsusel kasumit saada; on siiski seisukohal, et Strasbourgi linna lähenemisviis on vähemalt ebaviisakas, kuna see on vastuolus külalislahkuse nõuetega rahvusvaheliste institutsioonide suhtes;
– the rent Parliament pays for its official premises should cover the cost of construction, upkeep and use, but should not in any way contain a profit margin for the host country or local or regional authorities in that country; equally, it is also customary that any public land made available by a host Member State for the purpose of hosting an EU institution is granted to the said institution free and unencumbered; it has to be conceded, however, that none of this was contractually laid down; because of the good relationship with the City of Strasbourg as a supposedly non-profit-seeking public body; ; besides, there are no legal provisions prohibiting a state or local or regional authority from making a profit; takes the view, however, that the City of Strasbourg's approach is discourteous, to say the very least, since it is contrary to rules on hospitality towards international institutions;
– Strasbourgi linnale oli teada, et Euroopa Parlament jättis hüvitusklauslid varalistest lepingutest järjekindlalt välja, kuid ta ignoreeris seda teadlikult; see on kahjustanud Strasbourgi linna ja parlamendi usaldusvahekorda;
– the City of Strasbourg was aware of Parliament's consistent exclusion of compensation clauses in property contracts, yet deliberately ignored it ; that has dealt a blow to the relationship of trust between Strasbourg and the Parliament;
– taunib Strasbourgi linna tagasitõmbumist kolmepoolsetelt läbirääkimistelt parlamendiga, mille jooksul on talle kinnitatud, et kaotushüvitus seoses Strasbourgi linna ja SCI Erasme'i vahelise pikaajalise rendilepinguga on välistatud; seda seisukohta eirati Strasbourgi linna järgmistel kahepoolsetel läbirääkimistel SCI Erasme'iga;
– deplores the City of Strasbourg's withdrawal from tripartite negotiations with the Parliament, in the course of which it had been reiterated that compensation for loss of the long lease between the city of Strasbourg and SCI Erasme was excluded; this position was then ignored in the City of Strasbourg's subsequent bilateral negotiations with SCI Erasme;
– kahetseb sügavalt heausksuse puudumist nii Strasbourgi linna kui ka erainvestor SCI Erasme'i suhetes parlamendiga; Samuti kahetseb parlamendi administratsiooni vähest otsusekindlust;
– Deeply regrets the lack of good faith demonstrated by both the City of Strasbourg and the private investor, SCI Erasme in their relationship with Parliament; equally regrets the lack of resolve on the part of the administration of Parliament itself
– kutsub juhatust üles rendilepingut Strasbourgi linnaga 31. oktoobriks 2006 üles ütlema, et, juhul kui hoonete müük peaks edasi lükkuma, leppida kokku uus ja asjakohane renditasu;
– calls on the Bureau to give notice on the lease with the City of Strasbourg for 31 October 2006 in order - should purchase of the buildings be delayed - to negotiate a new and appropriate rent;
– kutsub juhatust üles kaaluma, kas oleks asjakohane kanda Strasbourgi linnale 2006. aasta esimese poolaasta eest üle esialgu ainult summa, mis võimaldab linnal katta tagasimaksed SCI-Erasmele, mitte aga kogu renti;
– calls on the Bureau to examine whether it might be appropriate to pay the City of Strasbourg, for the first half of 2006, initially only a rental amount allowing it to cover the repayments to SCI Erasme, but not the full rent;
– on seisukohal, et võiks olla mõistlik jätkata WICi ja SDMi hoonete ostukava, kui seejuures võetakse arvesse järgmisi tegureid: asjakohase rendi ja seetõttu ka tulevase ostuhinna suurus on ebaselge; hoonete vanus; põhimõtteliselt ei pruugita hüvitust maksta; parlamendi 25 aasta jooksul tasutud ja mitteõigustatud lisasummad tuleks ostuhinnaga tasaarvestada; maa ja hooned tuleks omandada üheaegselt;
– considers that it might be reasonable to continue to seek to purchase the WIC and SDM Buildings if, in the process, the following are factored in: what constitutes an appropriate rent and hence a prospective purchase price remain uncertain; the age of the buildings; no compensation can be paid on principle; Parliament's additional and unwarranted payments over 25 years should be offset against the purchase price; land and buildings should be acquired simultaneously;
– on seisukohal, et käesolev kolmiksuhe ei soodustanud täielikku läbipaistvust ega usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise tagamist ja on seetõttu seisukohal, et ELi institutsioonide ja organite ehituspoliitikas tuleks sellist olukorda vältida;
– Considers that the triangular relationship existing in this case was not conducive to full transparency or to guarantees of sound financial management and considers, therefore, that it should be avoided in the buildings policy of EU institutions and bodies;
– kutsub oma pädevaid organeid üles muutma eelarve täitmise sise-eeskirja artiklit 16 selliselt, et eelarvekomisjon peab andma oma nõusoleku ehitusprojektidele, millel on parlamendi eelarvele märkimisväärne rahaline mõju;
– calls on its competent bodies to amend Article 16 of the Internal Rules on the implementation of Parliament's budget to make building projects with significant financial implications for Parliament’s budget subject to the agreement of the Committee on Budgets;
– kutsub oma administratsiooni üles võtma vajalikke meetmeid, et korrapäraselt vähemalt iga viie aasta tagant kontrollida pikaajalisi lepingulisi kohustusi kolmandate osaliste suhtes, näiteks rendi- või teenuslepingud; nende kontrollide tulemused peaksid kajastuma ka peadirektorite tegevusaruannetes; nõuab, et esimene niisugune aruanne valmiks aegsasti enne 2005. aasta eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise menetlust ning igal järgneval aastal lisatakse see aasta tegevusaruande erijakku;
– calls on its Administration to take the necessary measures for a regular review, at least every five years, of long‑standing contractual obligations towards third parties, e.g. leases or service contracts; the results of those checks should also be included in the activity reports of the directors‑general calls for the first such report to be completed in good time for the budget discharge procedure for 2005 and subsequently included in an ad hoc section of the annual activity report every year thereafter;
– kutsub oma administratsiooni üles koostöös teiste liidu asutustega koostama aruannet selle kohta, kas oleks võimalik asutada Euroopa Liidu Ehitusamet, mis vastutaks ELi asutuste ja organite hoonete ehituse ja korrashoiu eest; nõuab, et see aruanne edastataks eelarvekontrollikomisjonile hiljemalt 1. oktoobriks 2007;
– calls on its Administration, in consultation with the other Union institutions, to draw up a report examining whether it might be feasible to establish a European Buildings Authority mandated with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU Institutions and Bodies; calls for such report to be forwarded to the Committee on Budgetary Control by 1 October 2007 at the latest;
– nendib, et Strasbourgi linn, eelkõige aga SCI Erasme ei ole veel vastanud kõigile Euroopa Parlamendi teabepäringutele; arutab seetõttu seda küsimust uuesti 2005. aasta eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmise menetluse käigus;
– notes that the City of Strasbourg, but more particularly SCI Erasme have not yet met all Parliament's requests for information; will therefore re-examine the issue at stake in the 2005 discharge procedure;
21. loodab, et parlament jätkab oma tööd Strasbourgi linna, SCI Erasme'i ja parlamendi vaheliste rendi- ja lepinguliste kokkulepete ning nendega seotud dokumentide uurimisel, et tuvastada kõik faktid;
Expects the Parliament to continue its work of examining the rental and contractual agreements and related documents between the City of Strasbourg, SCI Erasme and the Parliament in order to establish all the facts;
26. peab väga oluliseks kontrollikoja märkusi, mis osaliselt kattuvad siseaudiitori tähelepanekutega, st et endiselt on puudusi järelevalve- ja kontrollisüsteemides; on arvamusel, et need puudused on äärmiselt olulised, ning palub kontrollikojal ja siseaudiitoril käsitleda järgmises aastaaruandes sõnaselgelt süsteemseid parandusi;
Attaches considerable importance to the Court of Auditors' comments, which, to some extent, tally with the Internal Auditor’s findings, i.e. that there are still weaknesses in supervisory and control systems; takes the view that those weaknesses are a matter of the utmost priority and asks the Court of Auditors and the Internal Auditor expressly to examine systemic improvements in the next annual report;
Euroopa Parlamendi finantshaldus
Parliament's financial management
28. palub peasekretäril viivitamatult täita oma ammune lubadus ning koostada igal aastal lühike, kättesaadav ja atraktiivne dokument, et anda üldsusele rohkem teavet eelarve haldamise kohta parlamendis
Calls on the Secretary-General to draw up immediately, and as long since promised, a brief, accessible and attractive annual document to provide the public with more information on budgetary management in Parliament
30. nendib, et esimesed kogemused uue finantsmääruse sätete kohaldamisel institutsioonis parlament, kes peab täitma halduseelarvet, osutavad sellele, et mõnel juhul on loodud liiga keerulised süsteemid ja finantsringlus;
Notes that initial experience with applying the new Financial Regulation in an institution such as Parliament, which has an administrative budget to manage, indicates that in some cases overly complex systems and financial circuits have been set up;
32. kinnitab veel kord oma eespool nimetatud 12. aprilli 2005. aasta resolutsiooni lõikes 34 ning 21. aprilli 2004. aasta
Reaffirms, yet again, the view expressed in paragraph 34 of its above-mentioned resolution of 12 April 2005 and in its resolutions of 21 April 2004