natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(20) Tulenevalt Bulgaaria ja Rumeenia staatusest Euroopa Liidu kandidaatriikidena ja nende riikide tehtud edusammudest liikmeks saamiseks, tuleks neid käesoleva direktiivi tähenduses pidada turvalisteks päritoluriikideks kuni nende riikide liitumiseni Euroopa Liiduga.
(20) It results from the status of Bulgaria and Romania as candidate countries for the accession to the European Union and the progress made by these countries for membership that they should be regarded as constituting safe countries of origin for the purposes of this Directive until the date of their accession to the European Union.
It is premature to consider Romania and Bulgaria safe country of origin.
It is premature to consider Romania and Bulgaria safe country of origin.
Despite the adoption of asylum provisions, there are still shortcomings in the legislation and in the implementation.
Despite the adoption of asylum provisions, there are still shortcomings in the legislation and in the implementation.
(21) Kolmanda riigi määratlemine turvalise päritoluriigina käesoleva direktiivi tähenduses ei saa selle riigi kodanikele tagada absoluutset turvalisust.
(21) The designation of a third country as a safe country of origin for the purposes of this Directive cannot establish an absolute guarantee of safety for nationals of that country.
Oma olemuse tõttu saab määratlemise aluseks oleva hinnangu tegemisel võtta üksnes arvesse antud riigi tsiviil-, õiguslikku ja poliitilist olukorda ning seda, kas asjaomases riigis tagakiusamise, piinamise või ebainimliku või alandava kohtlemise või karistamise eest vastutavate inimeste suhtes kohaldatakse sanktsioone ka tegelikult.
By its very nature, the assessment underlying the designation can only take into account the general civil, legal and political circumstances in that country and whether actors of persecution, torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are subject to sanction in practice when found liable in the country concerned.
Sellel põhjusel on oluline, et kui taotleja toob kaalukad põhjused, miks tema olukorras ei saa antud riiki pidada tema jaoks turvaliseks, ei ole tema puhul enam asjakohane käsitada seda riiki turvalisena.
For this reason, it is important that, where an applicant shows that there are serious reasons to consider the country not to be safe in his/her particular circumstances, the designation of the country as safe can no longer be considered relevant for him/her.
Oma olemuse tõttu saab määratlemise aluseks oleva hinnangu tegemisel võtta üksnes arvesse antud riigi tsiviil-, õiguslikku ja poliitilist olukorda, sealhulgas inimõiguste, põhiõiguste ja pagulaste kaitsega seotud rahvusvahelise õiguse normide täitmine, ning seda, kas asjaomases riigis tagakiusamise, piinamise või ebainimliku või alandava kohtlemise või karistamise eest vastutavate inimeste suhtes kohaldatakse sanktsioone ka tegelikult.
By its very nature, the assessment underlying the designation can only take into account the general civil, legal and political circumstances in that country , including adherence to the rules of international law on human rights, fundamental freedoms and refugee protection, and whether actors of persecution, torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are subject to sanction in practice when found liable in the country concerned.
Adherence to the rules laid down in international law on human rights, fundamental freedoms and refugee protection should be included among the basic criteria used in assessing whether to designate a third country as a safe country (see Annex II of the Directive).
Adherence to the rules laid down in international law on human rights, fundamental freedoms and refugee protection should be included among the basic criteria used in assessing whether to designate a third country as a safe country (see Annex II of the Directive).
(22) Liikmesriigid peaksid kontrollima kõikide taotluste sisu, st tuvastama, kas taotlejat saab käsitada pagulasena vastavalt nõukogu direktiivile 2004/83/EÜ kolmandate riikide kodanikele ja kodakondsuseta isikutele pagulasseisundi või muud liiki rahvusvahelist kaitset vajava isiku staatuse omistamise miinimumnõuete ja pakutava kaitse sisu kohta, kui käesolevas direktiivis ei sätestata teisiti, eelkõige juhul, kui on põhjust oletada , et teine riik korraldab tuvastamise või võimaldab piisavat kaitset.
(22) Member States should examine all applications on the substance, i.e. assess whether the applicant in question qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Council Directive 2004/83/EC on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, except where this Directive provides otherwise, in particular where it can be reasonably assumed that another country would do the examination or provide sufficient protection.
Eriti ei tohiks liikmesriike kohustada hindama varjupaigataotluse sisu, kui esimene varjupaigariik on taotlejale andnud pagulasseisundi või muul moel piisava kaitse ja taotleja lubatakse sinna riiki tagasi .
Especially, Member States should not be obliged to assess the substance of an asylum application where a first country of asylum has granted the applicant refugee status or otherwise sufficient protection and the applicant will be readmitted to this country.
(22) Liikmesriigid peaksid kontrollima kõikide taotluste sisu, st tuvastama, kas taotlejat saab käsitada pagulasena vastavalt nõukogu direktiivile 2004/83/EÜ kolmandate riikide kodanikele ja kodakondsuseta isikutele pagulasseisundi või muud liiki rahvusvahelist kaitset vajava isiku staatuse omistamise miinimumnõuete ja pakutava kaitse sisu kohta, kui ei ole sätestatud , et teine riik on pädev korraldama tuvastamist ning suudab pakkuda tõhusat, asjakohast ja piisavat kaitset vastavalt nõukogu18. veebruari 2003. a määrusele (EÜ) nr 343/2003, millega kehtestatakse kriteeriumid ja mehhanismid selle liikmesriigi määramiseks, kes vastutab mõnes liikmesriigis kolmanda riigi kodaniku esitatud varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise eest*.
(22) Member States should examine all applications on the substance, i.e. assess whether the applicant in question qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Council Directive 2004/83/EC on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, except where it is established that another country is competent to do the examination and can provide effective, equivalent and adequate protection in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national*.
The term "sufficient" appears to indicate a lower degree of protection and should be replaced by effective.
The term "sufficient" appears to indicate a lower degree of protection and should be replaced by effective.
(23) Liikmesriike ei tohiks samuti kohustada varjupaigataotluse sisu hindama, kui siseriiklikus õiguses määratletud sideme tõttu kolmanda riigiga on põhjust eeldada, et taotleja otsib kaitset nimetatud kolmandalt riigilt.
(23) Member States should also not be obliged to assess the substance of an asylum application where the applicant, due to a connection to a third country as defined by national law, can reasonably be expected to seek protection in that third country.
Liikmesriigid peaksid tegutsema lähtuvalt sellest üksnes siis, kui asjassepuutuv taotleja oleks kõnealuses kolmandas riigis kaitstud.
Member States should only proceed on this basis where this particular applicant would be safe in the third country concerned.
Varjupaigataotlejate edasise liikumise vältimise huvides tuleks kehtestada ühised eeskirjad liikmesriikidele kolmandate riikide turvaliseks päritoluriigiks tunnistamiseks.
In the interest of avoiding secondary movements of applicants, common principles for the consideration or designation by Member States of third countries as safe should be established.
(24) Eriti kõrgeid inimõiguste ja pagulaste kaitse nõudeid järgivate Euroopa kolmandate riikide puhul tuleks liikmesriikidel lubada jätta varjupaigataotlused läbi vaatamata või teha seda osaliselt selliste taotlejate puhul, kes sisenevad nende territooriumile sellistest Euroopa kolmandatest riikidest.
(24) Furthermore, with respect to certain European third countries, which observe particularly high human rights and refugee protection standards, Member States should be allowed to carry out no or no full examination of asylum applications regarding applicants who enter their territory from such European third countries.
Arvestades piiratud või ärajäänud läbivaatamise võimalikke tagajärgi taotleja jaoks, peaks turvalise kolmanda riigi mõiste kohaldamine piirduma juhtumitega, mis hõlmavad kolmandaid riike, mille puhul nõukogu on veendunud, et käesolevas direktiivis sätestatud asjassepuutuva kolmanda riigi turvalisuse kõrgeid nõudeid järgitakse.
Given the potential consequences for the applicant of a restricted or omitted examination, this application of the safe third country concept should be restricted to cases involving third countries with respect to which the Council has satisfied itself that the high standards for the safety of the third country concerned, as set out in this Directive, are fulfilled.
Nõukogu peaks tegema otsused selles küsimuses pärast konsulteerimist Euroopa Parlamendiga.
The Council should take decisions in this matter after consultation of the European Parliament.
See justification to Am 35 A.
See justification to Am.
(25) Tulenevalt käesolevas direktiivis sätestatud mõlemat turvalise kolmanda riigi mõistet käsitlevate ühiste nõuete olemusest sõltub nende mõistete tegelik mõju sellest, kas kõnealune kolmas riik lubab kõnealusel taotlejal siseneda oma territooriumile.
(25) It follows from the nature of the common standards concerning both safe third country concepts as set out in this Directive, that the practical effect of the concepts depends on whether the third country in question permits the applicant in question to enter its territory.
(25) Tulenevalt käesolevas direktiivis sätestatud turvalise kolmanda riigi mõistet käsitlevate ühiste nõuete olemusest sõltub selle mõiste tegelik mõju sellest, kas kõnealune kolmas riik lubab kõnealusel taotlejal siseneda oma territooriumile.
(25) It follows from the nature of the common standards concerning the safe third country concept as set out in this Directive, that the practical effect of the concept depends on whether the third country in question permits the applicant in question to enter its territory.
The only concept accepted by the Rapporteur is the safe country of origin, not the "super safe".
The only concept accepted by the Rapporteur is the safe country of origin, not the "super safe".
(26) Seoses pagulasseisundi äravõtmisega peab liikmesriik tagama, et pagulasseisundiga kaasnevaid eeliseid kasutavaid isikuid teavitatakse nõuetekohaselt nende staatuse võimalikust uuesti läbivaatamisest ning et neil on võimalus esitada oma seisukoht enne, kui asutused võivad teha põhjendatud otsuse nende pagulasseisundi äravõtmiseks.
(26) With respect to the withdrawal of refugee status, Member States shall ensure that the persons benefiting from the refugee status are duly informed of a possible reconsideration of their status and have the opportunity to submit their point of view before the authorities can take a motivated decision to withdraw their status.
Nendest tagatistest võib siiski loobuda, kui pagulasseisundi peatamise põhjused ei ole seotud tingimuste muutumisega, millel tunnustamine põhines.
However, these guarantees can be dispensed with where the reasons for the cessation of the refugee status is not related to a change of the conditions on which the recognition was based.
(27) Asjaolu, et varjupaigataotluse ja pagulasseisundi äravõtmise otsuseid peab Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artikli 234 mõistes saama kohtus vaidlustada, peegeldab ühenduse õiguse üldpõhimõtet.
(27) It reflects a basic principle of Community law that the decisions taken on an application for asylum and on the withdrawal of a refugee status must be subject to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal in the meaning of Article 234 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Õiguskaitsevahendi tõhusus, ka seoses asjassepuutuvate faktide läbivaatamisega, sõltub iga liikmesriigi haldus- ja õigussüsteemist kui tervikust.
The effectiveness of the remedy, also with regard to the examination of the relevant facts, depends on the administrative and judicial system of each Member State seen as a whole.
Varjupaigataotlusega seoses langetatud otsused peaksid kuuluma edasikaebamisele, mille hulka kuulub nii faktide kui ka õigusküsimuste uurimine.
Decisions taken on an application for asylum should be subject to an appeal consisting of an examination on both facts and points of law by a court of law.
Taotlejal peaks olema õigus riigist mitte väljasaatmisele kuni kohus langetab otsuse õiguse üle jääda ootama edasikaebuse tulemuste selgumist.
The applicant should be entitled not to be expelled until a court has ruled on the right to remain pending the outcome of this appeal.
The principle of effective remedy is a general principle of international law and it is embodied in EC Law (e.g. C-222/84), In Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
The principle of effective remedy is a general principle of international law and it is embodied in EC Law (e.g. C-222/84), In Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
The effective remedy implies that the appeal should have a suspensive effect.
The effective remedy implies that the appeal should have a suspensive effect.
Põhjendus 28
Recital 28
(28) Kooskõlas Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artikliga 64 ei mõjuta käesolev direktiiv nende kohustuste täitmist, mis on liikmesriikidel avaliku korra säilitamiseks ja sisejulgeoleku kaitseks.
(28) In accordance with Article 64 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, this Directive does not affect the exercise of the responsibilities incumbent upon Member States with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security.
This recital has nothing to do with the Directive.
This recital has nothing to do with the Directive.
(29 a) Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 24. oktoobri 1995. a direktiivi 95/46/EÜ üksikisikute kaitse kohta isikuandmete töötlemisel ja selliste andmete vaba liikumise kohta
(29a) Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
EÜT L 281, 23.11.1995, lk 31 , kohaldatakse käesoleva direktiivi rakendamisel isikuandmete suhtes.
OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.31 shall apply to personal data treated in application of this directive.
Direktiivi 95/46/EÜ kohaldatakse ka liikmesriikide andmete edastamisel ÜRO pagulaste ülemkomissarile (UNHCR) oma ülesannete täitmiseks vastavalt Genfi konventsioonile.
Directive 95/46/EC shall also apply to the transmission of data from Member States to the UNHCR in the exercise of its mandate under the Geneva Convention.
Kõnealuste andmete edastamisel rakendatakse isikuandmete kaitset, mida UNHCR peab piisavaks.
This transmission is subject to the level of personal data protection in the UNHCR being considered as adequate.
This recital is very important and it was in the revised Commission proposal on the Directive.
This recital is very important and it was in the revised Commission proposal on the Directive.
Põhjendus 29 d (uus)
Recital 29 d (new)
(29 d) Vastavalt käesolevale direktiivile vastu võetud siseriiklike õigusnormide rikkumisel peaks liikmesriikidel olema ette nähtud karistused.
(29d) Member States should provide for penalties in the event of infringement of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive.
Käesoleva direktiivi eesmärgiks on kehtestada liikmesriikides pagulasseisundi omistamise ja äravõtmise menetluse miinimumnõuded.
The purpose of this Directive is to establish minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status.
Käesoleva direktiivi eesmärgiks on kehtestada liikmesriikides pagulasseisundi omistamise ja äravõtmise menetluse miinimumnõuded , mis on kooskõlas Genfi konventsiooni ja direktiiviga 2004/83/EÜ .
The purpose of this Directive is to establish minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status which are in line with the Geneva Convention and with Directive 2004/83/EC.
The respect of fundamental rights should be underscored also in an article, not only in the recital, in particular the reference to the right to asylum in the Charter.
The respect of fundamental rights should be underscored also in an article, not only in the recital, in particular the reference to the right to asylum in the Charter.
Artikli 2 punkt e
Article 2, point (e)
e ) tuvastav asutus – liikmesriigi kohtu laadne asutus või haldusorgan, mis vastutab varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise eest ning on pädev võtma vastu esimese astme otsuseid, kui I lisast ei tulene teisiti;
(e) "Determining authority" means any quasi- judicial or administrative body in a Member State responsible for examining applications for asylum and competent to take decisions at first instance in such cases, subject to Annex I;
e) tuvastav asutus – liikmesriigi kohtu- või haldusorgan, mis vastutab varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise eest ning on pädev võtma vastu esimese astme otsuseid, kui I lisast ei tulene teisiti;
(e) "Determining authority" means any judicial or administrative body in a Member State responsible for examining applications for asylum and competent to take decisions at first instance in such cases, subject to Annex I;
The determining authority is either competent to examine asylum applications or is not qualified to carry out this function and hence cannot carry it out.
The determining authority is either competent to examine asylum applications or is not qualified to carry out this function and hence cannot carry it out.
The term ‘quasi-judicial’ casts doubt on the legitimacy of the body itself.
The term ‘quasi-judicial’ casts doubt on the legitimacy of the body itself.
Artikli 2 punkt g
Article 2, point (g)
g) pagulasseisund – kolmanda riigi kodaniku või kodakondsuseta isiku pagulaseks tunnistamine liikmesriigi poolt;
(g) "Refugee Status" means the recognition by a Member State of a third country national or stateless person as a refugee;
g) pagulasseisund – taotlejale vastava staatuse andmise tunnistamine liikmesriigi poolt;
(g) "Refugee Status" means the recognition by a Member State of such status granted to the applicant ;
In the same way as for the previous amendment it is stressed that the concept of ‘refugee’ covers anyone who meets the criteria laid down in the Geneva Convention.
In the same way as for the previous amendment it is stressed that the concept of ‘refugee’ covers anyone who meets the criteria laid down in the Geneva Convention.
Any description or specification may be restrictive.
Any description or specification may be restrictive.
Refugee status is the recognition given to the applicant by a Member State.
Refugee status is the recognition given to the applicant by a Member State.
Artikli 2 punkt h
Article 2, point (h)
h) saatjata alaealine – alla 18-aastane isik, kes saabub liikmesriigi territooriumile tema eest seaduste või tavade kohaselt vastutava täiskasvanuta, ja seda senikaua kuni selline täiskasvanu ei ole teda tegelikult oma hoole alla võtnud; see mõiste hõlmab ka alaealist, kes on jäänud saatjata pärast tema sisenemist liikmesriikide territooriumile;
(h) "Unaccompanied minor " means a person below the age of eighteen who arrives in the territory of the Member States unaccompanied by an adult responsible for him/her whether by law or by custom, and for as long as he/she is not effectively taken into the care of such a person; it includes a minor who is left unaccompanied after he/she has entered the territory of the Member States;
h) saatjata laps või saatjast eraldatud laps – alla 18-aastane isik, kes saabub liikmesriigi territooriumile tema eest seaduste või tavade kohaselt vastutava täiskasvanuta, ja seda seni, kuni selline täiskasvanu ei ole teda tegelikult oma hoole alla võtnud; see mõiste hõlmab ka last , kes on jäänud saatjata pärast tema sisenemist liikmesriikide territooriumile; saatjata laps tähendab last, kes on eraldatud mõlemast vanemast, teistest sugulastest või seaduslikust või tavapärasest eestkostjast; saatjast eraldatud laps tähendab last, keda saadab täiskasvanu, kes ei soovi või ei ole võimeline võtma endale vastutust lapse pikaajalise hooldamise eest.
(h) " Unaccompanied child" or "separated child" means a person below the age of eighteen who arrives in the territory of the Member States unaccompanied by an adult responsible for him/her whether by law or by custom, and for as long as he/she is not effectively taken into the care of such a person; it includes a minor who is left unaccompanied after he/she has entered the territory of the Member States; "unaccompanied child" refers to a child who has been separated from both parents and other relatives or legal or customary guardians; "separated child" refers to a child who is accompanied by an adult who is unwilling or unable to assume responsibility for long-term care of the child.
Käesoleva direktiivi kohaldamisel hõlmab mõiste "saatjata alaealine"mõisteid "saatjata laps" ja "saatjast eraldatud laps".
For the purpose of this Directive, the term "unaccompanied minor" covers both "unaccompanied children" and "separated children";
Artikli 3 lõike 1 punkt a (uus)
Article 3, paragraph 1, point (a) (new)
a) Käesoleva direktiivi rakendamine ja riiklikesse õigusaktidesse ülevõtmine toimub, arvestades põhiinimõigusi ja põhimõtteid, mida tunnustab esmajoones Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta ühenduse õiguse üldiste põhimõtetena .
(a) This Directive shall be implemented and transposed into national legislation with due respect for fundamental human rights and principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as general principles of Community law.
Järgida tuleb rahvusvahelist õigust ja Ühinenud Rahvaste Organisatsiooni kokkuleppeid.
International law and United Nations agreements shall be observed.
Artikli 3 lõike 1 punkt b (uus)
Article 3, paragraph 1, point (b) (new)
b) Käesoleva direktiivi rakendamine ja riiklikesse õigusaktidesse ülevõtmine toimub ELi ja tema liikmesriikide kõiki rahvusvahelisi kohustusi ning eriti Genfi konventsiooni ning kolmandate riikidega sõlmitud partnerlus- ja koostööleppeid arvestades.
(b) This Directive shall be implemented and transposed into national legislation with due respect for all the existing international obligations of the EU and its Member States and, in particular, the Geneva Convention and partnership and cooperation agreements concluded with third countries.
Käesolevat direktiivi kohaldatakse kedagi mingil viisil diskrimineerimata asutamislepingu artikli 13 ning rahvusvaheliste inimõiguste ja pagulaste kaitse konventsioonide kohaselt.
This Directive shall be applied without discrimination of any form in accordance with Article 13 of the Treaty and international conventions on human rights and refugee protection.
In applying the Directive, Member States must take account of the principle of non-discrimination as laid down in Article 13 of the Treaty and in international conventions on human rights and refugee protection.
In applying the Directive, Member States must take account of the principle of non-discrimination as laid down in Article 13 of the Treaty and in international conventions on human rights and refugee protection.
Artikli 3 A lõike 1 esimene lõik
Article 3A, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1