natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
23. palub nõukogul ja komisjonil arutada lisaks ühenduse uurimiskavas ette nähtud vahenditele ka tulevaste täiendavate vahendite kulude tasakaalustatud jaotamise süsteemi, et tagada teadustöö kulude kandmisel liikmesriikide majanduse osatähtsuse arvesse võtmine vastavalt teatud protsendile SKTst; kavandamise usaldusväärsuse tõstmiseks peaks see süsteem nägema ette kohustuste võtmist mitmeaastaseks perioodiks,
Calls on the Council and the Commission to study a system of balanced sharing of expenditure on additional resources to be mobilised over and above those provided for in the Community research plan, in order to ensure that the burden of the cost of research takes account of the economic weight of individual Member States, based on a percentage of GNP, and to make commitments over a multiannual period, enabling reliable planning to take place.
Konsultatsioonid ja koostöö sidusrühmadega
Consultation and cooperation with stakeholders
25. rõhutab lisandväärtust, mida pakuvad konsultatsioonid ja koostöö ekspertidega kõigist asjakohastest julgeolekualase teadustöö sidusrühmadest Euroopa julgeolekualase teadustöö nõuandekogu raames; rõhutab vajadust tasakaalustatult kaasata tööstuse esindajaid, teadustöö sponsoreid ning avaliku ja erasektori kliente, teadusasutusi, riiklikke asutusi ja kodanikuvabadustega tegelevaid organisatsioone;
Emphasises the added value of consultation and cooperation with experts from all relevant security research stakeholders groups within the European Security Research Advisory Board framework; urges however a balanced involvement of industrial representatives, research sponsors and public and private customers, scientific research bodies, public institutions and representatives of civil liberties organisations;
29. soovitab, et atlandiüleste suhete raames peaks Euroopa julgeolekualases teadustöös tagama vajalikud jõupingutused dubleerituse vältimiseks ja koostalitlusvõime edendamiseks, arvestades samas liidu teadustöö eripärasid selles valdkonnas; rõhutab siiski, et liidu julgeolekualase teadustöö eelarvet peaks kasutama ELi ettevõtete huvide edendamiseks,
Recommends that, within the framework of the Transatlantic relations, European security research should entail the necessary efforts to avoid duplication and promote interoperability, while respecting the specificities of the Union research landscape in this field; emphasises nevertheless that the Union's security research budget should be used to develop EU corporate interests;
31. kutsub komisjoni üles esitama Euroopa Parlamendile viivitamatult strateegilisi tegevusjooni ning rakendamispõhimõtete ja -mehhanismide kohta saadud soovitusi, eriettepanekuid osalemise, lepingutüüpide ja teadustegevuse EJTP kaudu rahastamise vahendite kohta ning vajalikke korraldusi intellektuaalomandi ja tehnosiirde kohta, mis on töötatud välja koos julgeolekualase teadustöö nõuandekoguga;
Calls on the Commission to present to the Parliament the strategic lines of action, as well as the advice received on principles and mechanisms of implementation, the specific proposals concerning participation, types of contracts and financing instruments for research activities within the ESRP, and the necessary arrangements on intellectual property and technology transfer worked out together with the Advisory Board for Security Research without delay;
34. on arvamusel, et tuleks täpsemalt määratleda uue Euroopa Kaitseagentuuri tegevuse üksikasjad ja parameetrid, eriti julgeolekualase teadustegevuse ja töösuhete osas EJTPga;
Considers that more precise details and parameters of the new European Defence Agency activities, especially regarding security research activities and its working relations with the ESRP, should be more precisely defined;
37. nõuab potentsiaalse sünergia tõhusat optimeerimist kaitse- ja tsiviilotstarbeliste teadusuuringute vahel rakenduste integratsiooni ja tehnosiirde kaudu mõlemas sektoris; nõuab samal ajal erivahendite selgemat määratlemist, mille abil võiks lahendada julgeolekualase teadutööga seotud konkreetseid probleeme,
Calls for an efficient optimisation of the potential synergies between defence and civil research, through integration of applications and technology transfer across both sectors; at the same time calls for a clearer definition of the specific instruments that could help tackle the particular problems of security-related research;
Euroopa julgeolekualase teadustöö programmi juhtimine
Management of the European Security Research Programme
39. toonitab, et Euroopa julgeolekualase teadustöö programmi juhtimine peaks rõhutama koostalitlusvõime ja ühenduvuse lisandväärtust, et parandada piiriülest koostööd, vältida ebavajalikku dubleerimist ning parandada liidu jõupingutuste ühtsust;
Insists that the management of the European Security Research Programme should emphasise the added value of interoperability and connectivity so as to improve cross-border cooperation, avoid unnecessary duplication and improve the coherence of the Union’s efforts;
41. rõhutab vajadust edendada süsteemset koostööd ning uurida tööstuse ja teadusringkondade kombineeritud tugevaid külgi eesmärgiga tõsta Euroopa innovatiivsus maailma kõrgeimale tasemele;
Insists on the need to foster systematic collaboration and to explore the combined strengths of industry and the research community, with a view to increasing the European innovation ratio to the highest level in the world;
In line with previous European Parliament resolutions (and in particular that dated 20 November 2003) on the EU Defence Equipment Policy
In line with previous European Parliament resolutions (and in particular that dated 20 November 2003) on the EU Defence Equipment Policy
P5_TA(2003)0522 . , and the conclusions of various European Councils at Cologne (June 1999), Helsinki (December 1999), Thessaloniki (June 2003), Lisbon (March 2000) and Barcelona (March 2002), the European Commission has been developing important initiatives to prepare a European Security Research Programme (ESRP).
P5_TA(2003)0522 . , and the conclusions of various European Councils at Cologne (June 1999), Helsinki (December 1999), Thessaloniki (June 2003), Lisbon (March 2000) and Barcelona (March 2002), the European Commission has been developing important initiatives to prepare a European Security Research Programme (ESRP).
To this aim, it convened in October 2003 a "Group of personalities in the field of Security Research" (GoP) co-chaired by European Commissioners Philippe Busquin and Erkki Liikanen which also included eight industry Chairmen and Chief Executives, four EP Members, four Directors of Research Institutes and two Ministry of Defence officials.
To this aim, it convened in October 2003 a "Group of personalities in the field of Security Research" (GoP) co-chaired by European Commissioners Philippe Busquin and Erkki Liikanen which also included eight industry Chairmen and Chief Executives, four EP Members, four Directors of Research Institutes and two Ministry of Defence officials.
The primary mission of the Group was to propose principles and priorities of an ESRP in line with the European Union’s foreign, security and defence policy objectives and its ambition to construct an area of freedom, security and justice .
The primary mission of the Group was to propose principles and priorities of an ESRP in line with the European Union’s foreign, security and defence policy objectives and its ambition to construct an area of freedom, security and justice .
The group presented its report entitled "Research for a Secure Europe" on 15 March 2004.
The group presented its report entitled "Research for a Secure Europe" on 15 March 2004.
After stating that Europe should take advantage of its technological strengths and that technology itself cannot guarantee security, although security without technological support would be impossible, the GoP made a number of proposal, including:
After stating that Europe should take advantage of its technological strengths and that technology itself cannot guarantee security, although security without technological support would be impossible, the GoP made a number of proposal, including:
q A Community-funded ESRP ensuring the involvement of all Member States should be launched as early as 2007.
q A Community-funded ESRP ensuring the involvement of all Member States should be launched as early as 2007.
Minimum funding should be €1 billion per year, additional to existing funding.
Minimum funding should be €1 billion per year, additional to existing funding.
q In closing the gap between civil and defence research, the ESRP should seek to maximise the benefits of multi-purpose aspects of technology.
q In closing the gap between civil and defence research, the ESRP should seek to maximise the benefits of multi-purpose aspects of technology.
q The ESRP should focus on interoperability and connectivity as key elements of cross-border and inter-service cooperation.
q The ESRP should focus on interoperability and connectivity as key elements of cross-border and inter-service cooperation.
q New financing instruments should be created to enable research funding to be reimbursed, if justified, at up to 100% of cost.
q New financing instruments should be created to enable research funding to be reimbursed, if justified, at up to 100% of cost.
q A 'Security Research Advisory Board' should be established to draw strategic lines of action to prepare the ESRP research agenda as well as to advise on the principles and mechanisms for implementation.
q A 'Security Research Advisory Board' should be established to draw strategic lines of action to prepare the ESRP research agenda as well as to advise on the principles and mechanisms for implementation.
q The Commission and the Council should ensure an effective and efficient liaison between the ESRP and the European Defence Agency.
q The Commission and the Council should ensure an effective and efficient liaison between the ESRP and the European Defence Agency.
The Commission Communication dated 7 September 2004
The Commission Communication dated 7 September 2004
European Commission Communication "Security Research: The next Steps", COM(2004) 590, 7.9.2004. welcomed the recommendations contained in the GoP Report and further identified the basis and next steps to be taken in security research.
European Commission Communication "Security Research: The next Steps", COM(2004) 590, 7.9.2004. welcomed the recommendations contained in the GoP Report and further identified the basis and next steps to be taken in security research.
From the EP point of view, the development of a research and development programme in the area of security and defence constitutes a major priority
From the EP point of view, the development of a research and development programme in the area of security and defence constitutes a major priority
As the Balkans conflict clearly illustrated, Europe's security aspirations remain largely unsupported by industrial capabilities and credible research.
As the Balkans conflict clearly illustrated, Europe's security aspirations remain largely unsupported by industrial capabilities and credible research.
The persistent gap in military capabilities and defence technology between the United States and Europe are exacerbated by the disparities regarding investment in research and development.
The persistent gap in military capabilities and defence technology between the United States and Europe are exacerbated by the disparities regarding investment in research and development.
Recent studies show clear under-investment in research and development within the defence sector in comparison to other world regions.
Recent studies show clear under-investment in research and development within the defence sector in comparison to other world regions.
In this sector, Member States' budgets for research and development remain five times lower than in the United States (€10 versus €54 billion annually).
In this sector, Member States' budgets for research and development remain five times lower than in the United States (€10 versus €54 billion annually).
In fact, defence research and development expenditure in Europe have remained unchanged or even declined over the last ten years.
In fact, defence research and development expenditure in Europe have remained unchanged or even declined over the last ten years.
Though Europe's military equipment policy is not intended to copy that of the United States, it is clear that these significant disparities constitute a major obstacle to the necessary interoperability of the military resources of the allies in any theatre of operations.
Though Europe's military equipment policy is not intended to copy that of the United States, it is clear that these significant disparities constitute a major obstacle to the necessary interoperability of the military resources of the allies in any theatre of operations.
This gap is also accentuated by the high level of fragmentation and compartmentalisation of European security research.
This gap is also accentuated by the high level of fragmentation and compartmentalisation of European security research.
Currently there is no coherent approach to defence research at Union level.
Currently there is no coherent approach to defence research at Union level.
The limited cooperation between the Member States and the lack of effective coordination of European efforts provoke additional problems regarding interoperability and cost-efficiency of security programmes.
The limited cooperation between the Member States and the lack of effective coordination of European efforts provoke additional problems regarding interoperability and cost-efficiency of security programmes.
Furthermore, these problems assume a more significant dimension given the artificial separation between civil and defence research that hampers the potential for cross-fertilisation between the two research fields.
Furthermore, these problems assume a more significant dimension given the artificial separation between civil and defence research that hampers the potential for cross-fertilisation between the two research fields.
To overcome these deficiencies, using its technological strengths to build deployment capability for essential resources in ESDP operations as well as for tackling new and more sophisticated security challenges, Europe clearly needs to undertake a coherent and structured research and development programme in the area of defence.
To overcome these deficiencies, using its technological strengths to build deployment capability for essential resources in ESDP operations as well as for tackling new and more sophisticated security challenges, Europe clearly needs to undertake a coherent and structured research and development programme in the area of defence.
In addition, security research could also play a decisive role in the Lisbon Strategy by enhancing Europe's industrial competitiveness and by strengthening its scientific and technological base.
In addition, security research could also play a decisive role in the Lisbon Strategy by enhancing Europe's industrial competitiveness and by strengthening its scientific and technological base.
It could then contribute to the Lisbon and Barcelona objectives of investing 3% of GDP in research and development by 2010 and making Europe the most competitive knowledge-based economy in the world.
It could then contribute to the Lisbon and Barcelona objectives of investing 3% of GDP in research and development by 2010 and making Europe the most competitive knowledge-based economy in the world.
Therefore, by addressing existing and future security challenges, ensuring European credibility in ESDP operations and stimulating innovation and competitiveness in the European economy, the European Security Research Programme (ESRP) finds its "raison d'être".
Therefore, by addressing existing and future security challenges, ensuring European credibility in ESDP operations and stimulating innovation and competitiveness in the European economy, the European Security Research Programme (ESRP) finds its "raison d'être".
A flexible, coherent and coordinated approach for the European Security Research Programme
A flexible, coherent and coordinated approach for the European Security Research Programme
In addressing the need for more efficient security research, the Commission proposes the launching of an ESRP starting in 2007.
In addressing the need for more efficient security research, the Commission proposes the launching of an ESRP starting in 2007.
The future ESRP should be based on a flexible, coherent and coordinated approach to security research.
The future ESRP should be based on a flexible, coherent and coordinated approach to security research.
First of all, as a mean of addressing the new security context, the future ESRP should focus on research activities and technology areas that would enable the Union to concretely meet the current security needs.
First of all, as a mean of addressing the new security context, the future ESRP should focus on research activities and technology areas that would enable the Union to concretely meet the current security needs.
It should be based on a European agenda that identifies the most efficient and appropriate technological instruments to feasibly accomplish EU security missions.
It should be based on a European agenda that identifies the most efficient and appropriate technological instruments to feasibly accomplish EU security missions.
Thus, in order to provide the necessary capabilities in the field of detection, protection, surveillance and monitoring, systems interoperability - key areas in tackling the new security challenges - progress in sensors systems, biotechnology, space and IT technology, should be sought.
Thus, in order to provide the necessary capabilities in the field of detection, protection, surveillance and monitoring, systems interoperability - key areas in tackling the new security challenges - progress in sensors systems, biotechnology, space and IT technology, should be sought.
The five research project priority areas identified by the ESPR-Preparatory action
The five research project priority areas identified by the ESPR-Preparatory action
The ESPR-Preparatory action, entitled "Enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of Security research 2004-2006", was launched by Commission’s Security Research Communication “Towards a programme to advance European security through research and technology”, COM(2004) 72, 3.2.2004. - improving situation awareness; optimising security and protection of network systems; protection against terrorism, including bio-terrorism and incidents with biological, chemical and other substances; enhancing crisis management; and interoperability and integrated systems for information and communication – constitute crucial research areas for the development of the necessary European capabilities and address the "immediate security challenges" facing Europe.
The ESPR-Preparatory action, entitled "Enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of Security research 2004-2006", was launched by Commission’s Security Research Communication “Towards a programme to advance European security through research and technology”, COM(2004) 72, 3.2.2004. - improving situation awareness; optimising security and protection of network systems; protection against terrorism, including bio-terrorism and incidents with biological, chemical and other substances; enhancing crisis management; and interoperability and integrated systems for information and communication – constitute crucial research areas for the development of the necessary European capabilities and address the "immediate security challenges" facing Europe.
In this context, the key role of the so called C4ISR systems (command, control, communications, computing, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) as essential potential capabilities to the "modern security challenges" should be stressed, in order to fill the persistent gap existing in most Member States.
In this context, the key role of the so called C4ISR systems (command, control, communications, computing, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) as essential potential capabilities to the "modern security challenges" should be stressed, in order to fill the persistent gap existing in most Member States.
Important initiatives and instruments have already been launched to make advances in the space domain, as the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) programme or the GALILEO satellite radionavigation programme.
Important initiatives and instruments have already been launched to make advances in the space domain, as the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) programme or the GALILEO satellite radionavigation programme.
Other actions are foreseen, especially in the context of the White Paper on European Space Policy
Other actions are foreseen, especially in the context of the White Paper on European Space Policy
White Paper "Space : a new European frontier for an expanding Union – An action plan for implementing the European Space Policy", COM(2003) 673, 11.11.2003. .
White Paper "Space : a new European frontier for an expanding Union – An action plan for implementing the European Space Policy", COM(2003) 673, 11.11.2003. .
However, considerable efforts are yet to be made to improve technologies such as digitalisation, data processing and global positioning.
However, considerable efforts are yet to be made to improve technologies such as digitalisation, data processing and global positioning.
In particular space and cyberspace, optimal bases for worldwide observation and data collection are becoming crucial dimensions in Union security missions and should be underlined in the future programme.
In particular space and cyberspace, optimal bases for worldwide observation and data collection are becoming crucial dimensions in Union security missions and should be underlined in the future programme.
Moreover, although these technological instruments are defined according to the key threats in the current security context as identified by the 2003 European security strategy, it should be pointed out that the concept of security is continually changing and will change rapidly in the coming years.
Moreover, although these technological instruments are defined according to the key threats in the current security context as identified by the 2003 European security strategy, it should be pointed out that the concept of security is continually changing and will change rapidly in the coming years.
It is difficult to foresee the future evolution of threats, and thus, to anticipate future technological needs.
It is difficult to foresee the future evolution of threats, and thus, to anticipate future technological needs.
Therefore, a comprehensive and continuous analysis of security-related capability needs should be ensured in the future ESRP.
Therefore, a comprehensive and continuous analysis of security-related capability needs should be ensured in the future ESRP.
A most flexible and coherent approach to security research supposes simultaneously an efficient exploitation of the potential synergies between the traditionally distinct sectors of defence and civil research.
A most flexible and coherent approach to security research supposes simultaneously an efficient exploitation of the potential synergies between the traditionally distinct sectors of defence and civil research.
Clear potential exists on the dual character of many technologies.
Clear potential exists on the dual character of many technologies.
Indeed, the technology bases for defence and civil applications are increasingly inter-related.
Indeed, the technology bases for defence and civil applications are increasingly inter-related.
On one hand, many technologies initiated for defence purposes have led to important commercial applications (for example, fibre optics, global positioning system (GPS)).
On one hand, many technologies initiated for defence purposes have led to important commercial applications (for example, fibre optics, global positioning system (GPS)).