natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See keeld ei laiene M3-kategooria bussidele (III või B klass), mille tehniliselt lubatud maksimaalne tühikaal ületab 10 tonni ja milles küljega sõidu suunas olevad istmed on paigutatud rühmiti sõiduki tagumises osas, nii et need moodustavad maksimaalselt kümne istmega integreeritud salongi.
This prohibition shall not extend to coaches of category M 3 (class III or B) of a technically permissible maximum laden weight exceeding 10 tonnes in which side-facing seats are grouped together at the rear of the vehicle to form an integrated saloon of up to 10 seats.
Niisugused küljega sõidu suunas olevad istmed tuleb paigaldada koos peatoega ja tõmburiga varustatud kahepunktivööga, mille tüüp on kinnitatud vastavalt direktiivile 76/115/EÜ.
Such side-facing seats shall be fitted with, at least, a head-restraint and a two-point belt with retractor, type-approved in accordance with Directive 76/115/EC.
Antud vabastus kehtib viie aasta jooksul alates käesoleva direktiivi vastuvõtmise kuupäevast.
This exemption shall have effect for 5 years from the date of adoption of this Directive.
Võib juhtuda, et seda kehtivusaega pikendatakse, kui on olemas usaldusväärsed statistilised andmed liiklusõnnetuste kohta ja vahepeal ei ole turvavööde süsteeme edasi arendatud.
It may be extended if reliable accident statistics are available and there has been further development of safety belt systems.
ARTIKLI 1 LÕIGE 2 A (uus)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2 A (new)
Artikkel 5 a (uus) (direktiiv 74/408/EMÜ)
Article 5 a (new) (Directive 74/408/EEC)
2 a) Lisatakse järgmine artikkel:
2a) The following Article shall be inserted:
Artikkel 5a
'Article 5a
Direktiivi 70/156/EMÜ artiklite 1 ja 8 kohaselt lubatud erandeid käesoleva direktiivi sätetest ei lubata."
Exemptions from the provisions of this Directive granted pursuant to Articles 1 and 8 of Directive 70/156/EEC shall not be granted.'.
Road safety is a very serious matter where exemptions can mean as much as life or death.
Road safety is a very serious matter where exemptions can mean as much as life or death.
The Commission proposal and the common position
The Commission proposal and the common position
The Community legislation in force currently requires only passenger cars to be fitted with safety belts.
The Community legislation in force currently requires only passenger cars to be fitted with safety belts.
The installation of safety belts with additional protection features such as restraint systems, anchorages and head restraints is governed at European level by Directives 77/541/EEC, 76/115/EEC and 74/408/EEC.
The installation of safety belts with additional protection features such as restraint systems, anchorages and head restraints is governed at European level by Directives 77/541/EEC, 76/115/EEC and 74/408/EEC.
The proposal addressed in this recommendation is part of a package (COM (2003) 361, 362 and 363) to amend these three directives, making it compulsory for vehicles other than passenger cars to be equipped with safety belts.
The proposal addressed in this recommendation is part of a package (COM (2003) 361, 362 and 363) to amend these three directives, making it compulsory for vehicles other than passenger cars to be equipped with safety belts.
For technical reasons, the three directives proposed must enter into force at the same time.
For technical reasons, the three directives proposed must enter into force at the same time.
In addition to the main issue of equipping vehicles with safety belt systems, the Commission has also included in the proposal in question a provision prohibiting the installation of side-facing seats in vehicles of categories M 1 , N 1 , M 2 (of class III or B) and M 3 (of class III or B).
In addition to the main issue of equipping vehicles with safety belt systems, the Commission has also included in the proposal in question a provision prohibiting the installation of side-facing seats in vehicles of categories M 1 , N 1 , M 2 (of class III or B) and M 3 (of class III or B).
In its common position, the Council made only a few changes to the Commission's proposal.
In its common position, the Council made only a few changes to the Commission's proposal.
It defined the different seat arrangements, extended the scope of the directive to include folding seats and postponed the deadlines for entry into force.
It defined the different seat arrangements, extended the scope of the directive to include folding seats and postponed the deadlines for entry into force.
Parliament's proposed amendments from the first reading focused on the ban on side-facing seats in vehicles of category M 3 (class III or B) and have not been adopted by the Council.
Parliament's proposed amendments from the first reading focused on the ban on side-facing seats in vehicles of category M 3 (class III or B) and have not been adopted by the Council.
As was made clear in the first reading, it would be useful to press ahead with fitting vehicles with safety belts as well as extending the requirement to wear safety belts.
As was made clear in the first reading, it would be useful to press ahead with fitting vehicles with safety belts as well as extending the requirement to wear safety belts.
The fitting of all vehicles with life-saving safety belts, restraint systems and head restraints is welcomed wholeheartedly and is not at all at issue.
The fitting of all vehicles with life-saving safety belts, restraint systems and head restraints is welcomed wholeheartedly and is not at all at issue.
The rapporteur's concerns relate to just one point in the Commission proposal and now also the common position, as the Council rejected Parliament's amendments on the subject.
The rapporteur's concerns relate to just one point in the Commission proposal and now also the common position, as the Council rejected Parliament's amendments on the subject.
The newly tabled amendment addresses the ban on side-facing seats in buses belonging to vehicle category M 3 (class III or B) and, therefore, the discrimination against a small group of buses with high-quality fittings ostensibly on the grounds of 'road safety'.
The newly tabled amendment addresses the ban on side-facing seats in buses belonging to vehicle category M 3 (class III or B) and, therefore, the discrimination against a small group of buses with high-quality fittings ostensibly on the grounds of 'road safety'.
The effectiveness of safety belts or the degree to which they are effective depends on the orientation of the seat with regard to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle.
The effectiveness of safety belts or the degree to which they are effective depends on the orientation of the seat with regard to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle.
The distribution of forces varies depending on whether the accident involves a head-on impact, a side impact (usually as a result of skidding) or a rollover lengthways or diagonally.
The distribution of forces varies depending on whether the accident involves a head-on impact, a side impact (usually as a result of skidding) or a rollover lengthways or diagonally.
The belt's effectiveness is therefore particularly dependent on the type of accident.
The belt's effectiveness is therefore particularly dependent on the type of accident.
In a head-on collision, the belt is more effective on seats facing the direction of travel than on side-facing seats.
In a head-on collision, the belt is more effective on seats facing the direction of travel than on side-facing seats.
It is, however, a completely different scenario for a side-on crash or a vehicle rollover, which is typical of accidents involving M 3 category buses.
It is, however, a completely different scenario for a side-on crash or a vehicle rollover, which is typical of accidents involving M 3 category buses.
In this case, the distribution of forces is such that a side-facing seat equipped with a safety belt offers equal or sometimes better protection even than a forward-facing seat.
In this case, the distribution of forces is such that a side-facing seat equipped with a safety belt offers equal or sometimes better protection even than a forward-facing seat.
If no risk is seen for passengers on side-facing seats on urban and rural public transport buses, it is surely difficult to claim that seats of this kind present a risk on travel coaches.
If no risk is seen for passengers on side-facing seats on urban and rural public transport buses, it is surely difficult to claim that seats of this kind present a risk on travel coaches.
At this point, it should also be borne in mind that the Commission and the Council do not intend to prohibit side-facing seats in medium and heavy goods vehicles.
At this point, it should also be borne in mind that the Commission and the Council do not intend to prohibit side-facing seats in medium and heavy goods vehicles.
Any discrimination against the bus sector should be avoided in this respect.
Any discrimination against the bus sector should be avoided in this respect.
The rapporteur will, therefore, continue to insist on his amendment and asks his colleagues for their support in this matter.
The rapporteur will, therefore, continue to insist on his amendment and asks his colleagues for their support in this matter.
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi vastuvõtmiseks, millega muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 74/408/EMÜ, mis käsitleb mootorsõidukite istmeid, nende kinnituspunkte ja peatugesid
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega kehtestatakse süvalesta varude taastamise kava Loode-Atlandi Kalastusorganisatsiooni raames
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a rebuilding plan for Greenland halibut in the framework of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0640 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0640 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artiklit 37, mille kohaselt nõukogu konsulteeris Euroopa Parlamendiga ( C6-0197/2004 );
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0197/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse kalanduskomisjoni raportit ( A6-0116/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0116/2005 ),
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek, millega kehtestatakse süvalesta varude taastamise kava Loode-Atlandi Kalastusorganisatsiooni raames
Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a recovery plan for Greenland halibut in the framework of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation
( Ei puuduta eestikeelset versiooni. )
(This amendment applies throughout the text.
7) Taastamiskava tuleb rakendada alaliselt.
(7) It is therefore necessary to implement the rebuilding plan on a permanent basis.
Selle jaoks tuleb kindlaks määrata menetlus selliste aluste nimekirja edastamiseks, millele on välja antud kalapüügiluba kooskõlas nõukogu 27. juuni 1994. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 1627/94, millega nähakse ette kalapüügilube käsitlevad üldsätted.
To that end a procedure should be determined for the transmission of the list of vessels to which a special fishing permit has been issued in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1627/94 of 27 June 1994 laying down general provisions concerning special fishing permits.
7) Seetõttu tuleb taastamiskava lisada lõplikult ühenduse õigusesse.
(7) It is therefore necessary to incorporate the recovery plan into Community law on a firm basis.
9) Täiendavad kontrollimeetmed on vajalikud, et tagada taastamiskava tõhus rakendamine ühenduse tasandil ja kindlustada järjepidevus nõukogus muudel aladel vastu võetud taastamiskavadega.
(9) Additional control measures are required to ensure an effective implementation at Community level and to ensure coherence with recovery plans adopted by the Council in other areas.
Meetmed peaksid sisaldama kohustust teavitada liikmesriigi sadamat sinna sisenemisest, samuti lubatud kõikumise piiramist.
Such measures should include an obligation for prior notification of entry into port designated by Member States and to limit margins of tolerance .
Nimetatud meetmed peaksid sisaldama kohustust eelnevalt teavitada sisenemisest liikmesriikide määratud sadamatesse.
Such measures should include an obligation for prior notification of entry into port designated by Member States.
Artikli 3 lõike 1 teine lõik
Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
Kui NAFO siiski leiab, et nimetatud lubatud kogupüügi (TAC) piirangutest ei piisa süvalesta varude säästva püügi tagamiseks, muudab nõukogu komisjoni ettepaneku põhjal kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega esimeses lõikes sätestatud TACi piiranguid vastavalt NAFO otsusele.
However, where it is decided by NAFO that those TAC levels will not ensure a sustainable fishery of that stock, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall adjust the TAC provided for in the first subparagraph in conformity with the decision by NAFO.
Kui NAFO siiski leiab, et nimetatud lubatud kogupüügi (TAC) piirangutest ei piisa süvalesta varude säästva püügi tagamiseks (või kui vastupidiselt on täheldatud varude taastumist) , muudab nõukogu komisjoni ettepaneku põhjal kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega esimeses lõikes sätestatud TACi piiranguid vastavalt NAFO otsusele.
However, where it is decided by NAFO that those TAC levels will not ensure a sustainable fishery of that stock (or where, on the other hand, recovery of the stock is detected) , the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall adjust the TAC provided for in the first subparagraph in conformity with the decision by NAFO.
Iga liikmesriik jaotab oma süvalesta kvoodi lõikes 1 nimetatud loendisse kantud aluste vahel.
Each Member State shall allocate its quota for Greenland halibut among its vessels included in the list referred to in paragraph 1.
Liikmesriigid teavitavad komisjoni kvootide jaotamisest igal aastal hiljemalt 15. detsembriks.
Member States shall inform the Commission of the allocation of quotas not later than 15 December each year.
Iga liikmesriik võtab vajalikud meetmed, et jaotada oma süvalesta kvoot lõikes 1 nimetatud loendisse kantud aluste vahel.
Each Member State shall take the necessary action to allocate its quota for Greenland halibut among its vessels included in the list referred to in paragraph 1.
Liikmesriigid teavitavad komisjoni kvootide jaotamisest igal aastal hiljemalt 15. jaanuariks.
Member States shall inform the Commission of the allocation of quotas not later than 15 January each year.
Kui vastavalt lõike 1 punktile b edastatud süvalesta kogused arvatakse olevat ammendanud 70% liikmesriigi kvoodist, peavad kaptenid edastama punktis b nimetatud aruanded iga päev.
When quantities of Greenland halibut reported in accordance with paragraph 1 point (b) are deemed to have exhausted 70 % of the Member States’ quota, masters shall take transmit the reports referred to in point (b) on a daily basis .
Kui vastavalt lõike 1 punktile b edastatud süvalesta kogused arvatakse olevat ammendanud 70% liikmesriigi kvoodist, peavad kaptenid edastama punktis b nimetatud aruanded igal kolmandal päeval.
When quantities of Greenland halibut reported in accordance with paragraph 1 point (b) are deemed to have exhausted 70 % of the Member States’ quota, masters shall transmit the reports referred to in point (b) every third day .
Laeva alapiirkonnas 2 ja rajoonides 3K, 3L, 3M, 3N ja 3O viibimise ajal pardal hoitavaid süvalesta koguseid tuleb pardal säilitada eraldi ülejäänud saagist ning need peavad olema selgelt märgistatud.
The daily quantities of Greenland halibut retained on board during the vessel’s stay in NAFO Sub-area 2 and Divisions 3KLMNO shall be stored on board separately from the other catches and clearly labelled.
Võttes arvesse laevapere ja laeva liikumise ohutust, mõlemad kuuluvad laeva kapteni vastutusalasse ning pädevusse, tuleb laeva alapiirkonnas 2 ja rajoonides 3K, 3L, 3M, 3N ja 3O viibimise ajal pardal hoitavaid süvalesta koguseid pardal säilitada eraldi ülejäänud saagist ning need peavad olema selgelt märgistatud.
Taking into account the safety of the crew and the movements of the vessel, both of which fall under the powers and responsibilities of the captain, the daily quantities of Greenland halibut retained on board during the vessel’s stay in NAFO Sub-area 2 and Divisions 3KLMNO shall be stored on board separately from the other catches and clearly labelled.
Püügipäevikusse kantud hinnanguliste koguste lubatud kõikumine
Margin of tolerance in the estimation of quantities reported in the logbook
Erandina komisjoni määruse (EMÜ) nr 2807/83
By way of derogation from Article 5 (2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83
EÜT L 257, 17.09.1988, lk 20.
OJ L 257, 17.9.1988, p.
Artikli 9 lõige 4 a (uus)
Article 9, paragraph 4 a (new)
Käesolevas artiklis sätestatud meetmed kehtivad üksnes artiklis 4 osutatud kalapüügilube omavatele alustele.
The measures laid down in this Article shall apply exclusively to the vessels with a special fishing permit which are referred to in Article 4.
This paragraph is included for the purpose of identifying the vessels to which the specific rules will apply .
This paragraph is included for the purpose of identifying the vessels to which the specific rules will apply.
Artikli 10 lõige 1 a (uus)
Article 10, paragraph 1 a (new)
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega kehtestatakse süvalesta varude taastamise kava Loode-Atlandi Kalastusorganisatsiooni raames
Proposal for a Council regulation establishing a rebuilding plan for Greenland halibut in the framework of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation
PECH 1 .12.2004
PECH 1 .12.2004
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi vastuvõtmiseks, millega muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 76/115/EMÜ mootorsõidukite turvavööde kinnituspunkte käsitlevate liikmesriikide õigusaktide ühtlustamise kohta
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts
nõukogu ühise seisukoha kohta Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi vastuvõtmiseks, millega muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 76/115/EMÜ mootorsõidukite turvavööde kinnituspunkte käsitlevate liikmesriikide õigusaktide ühtlustamise kohta
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts
– võttes arvesse nõukogu ühist seisukohta (11933/3/2004 – C6-0030/2005 );
– having regard to the Council common position (11933/3/2004 – C6‑0030/2005 ),
– võttes arvesse transpordi- ja turismikomisjoni soovitust teisele lugemisele ( A6‑0117/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0117/2005 ),
9 a) Liikmesriikide pädevate asutuste lubatud erandeid konverentsibussideks ette nähtud ja väikeste seeriatena või üksikmudelitena toodetud sõidukitele tuleks teistes liikmesriikides automaatselt tunnustada ulatuses, mis puudutab selliste sõidukite kasutamist, müüki ja registreerimist.
(9a) Exemptions granted by the competent authorities of Member States for vehicles designed as conference buses and produced in small series or as individual vehicles should be automatically recognised in the other Member States as far as the use, sale and registration of those vehicles is concerned.
ARTIKLI 1 LÕIGE 1 A (uus)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 A (new)
Artikkel 5 a (uus) (direktiiv 76/115/EMÜ)
Article 5 a (new) (Directive 76/115/EEC)
1 a) Lisatakse järgmine artikkel:
1a) The following Article shall be inserted:
"Artikkel 5 a
"Article 5a
Komisjon ja liikmesriigid astuvad vajalikke samme tagamaks, et liikmesriigi pädeva asutuse poolt vastavalt direktiivi 70/156/EMÜ artikli 8 lõike 2 punktile a lubatud erandeid konverentsibussideks ette nähtud M 3 kategooria sõidukitele tunnustaksid teiste liikmesriikide pädevad asutused ulatuses, mis puudutab selliste sõidukite kasutamist, müüki ja registreerimist.".
The Commission and the Member States shall take the necessary steps to ensure that exemptions for vehicles of category M 3 designed as conference buses granted by the competent authority of a Member State pursuant to Article 8(2)(a) of Directive 70/156/EEC are recognised by the competent authorities of the other Member States as far as the use, sale and registration of those vehicles is concerned.".
ARTIKLI 1 LÕIKE 2 PUNKT B A (uus)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT B A (new)
I lisa punkt 4.3.2 (direktiiv 76/115/EMÜ)
Annex I, point 4.3.2 (Directive 76/115/EEC)
Iga istekoha turvavöö kinnituspunktide minimaalne arv on kindlaks määratud 1. liites.
4.3.2 The minimum number of safety belt anchorages for each seating position shall be as specified in Appendix 1.
ARTIKLI 1 LÕIKE 2 PUNKT C A (uus)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT C A (new)
I lisa punkt 5.4.2 (direktiiv 76/115/EMÜ)
Annex I, point 5.4.6 (Directive 76/115/EEC)
c a) punkti 5.4.6 pealkiri asendatakse järgmisega:
ca) The title of point 5.4.6 shall be amended as follows:
ARTIKLI 1 LÕIKE 2 PUNKT C B (uus)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT C B (new)
I lisa 1.liite tabel (direktiiv 76/115/EMÜ)
Annex I, Appendix 1, table (Directive 76/115/EEC)
Ettesuunatud istmed
Forward facing seating positions
Küljele suunatud
Side facing
3 või 2 Æ
3 or 2 Æ
3 või 2 *
3 or 2 *
3 või 2 z
3 or 2 z
2 või 0 #
2 or 0 #
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi vastuvõtmiseks, millega muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 76/115/EMÜ mootorsõidukite turvavööde kinnituspunkte käsitlevate liikmesriikide õigusaktide ühtlustamise kohta
The Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsus, millega muudetakse nõukogu otsust 2000/819/EÜ ettevõtteid ja ettevõtlust, eelkõige väikseid ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtteid (VKEd) käsitleva mitmeaastase programmi kohta (2001–2005)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005)
ettepaneku kohta võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsus, millega muudetakse nõukogu otsust 2000/819/EÜ ettevõtteid ja ettevõtlust, eelkõige väikseid ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtteid (VKEd) käsitleva mitmeaastase programmi kohta (2001–2005)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005)
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0781 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0781 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 251 lõiget 2 ja artikli 157 lõiget 3, mille alusel komisjon Euroopa Parlamendile ettepaneku esitas ( C6‑0242/2004 );
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 157(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0242/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0118/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0118/2005 ),
2. palub komisjonil asi uuesti Euroopa Parlamenti saata, kui ta kavatseb ettepanekut oluliselt muuta või selle teise tekstiga asendada;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Artikli 7 lõige 1 (otsus 2000/819/EÜ)
Article 7, paragraph 1(Decision 2000/819/EC)