natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6. väljendab muret asjaolu üle, et kokkulepe ei käsitle piisavalt kõige vaesemate riikide (G90) mureküsimusi, mille arengut takistavad pidevad tarnepiirangud, mis ei võimalda neil kasutada ära ekspordivõimalusi ning muudavad nad haavatavateks nende siseturgudel olevast suurenenud konkurentsist tulenevate kahjude suhtes, kuna enamik vähem moonutatud põllumajandusturgudelt saadavatest hüvedest toovad kasu keskmise suurusega või suurtele arenguriikidele (G20);
6. expresses concern over the fact that the Agreement fails to address adequately the concerns of the poorest countries (the G90), which are hampered by chronic supply side constraints, preventing them from taking advantage of export opportunities, and rendering them vulnerable to losses from increased competition on their domestic markets, as most of the benefits from less distorted agricultural markets will benefit medium or large developing countries (the G20);
7. nõuab vaeste riikide ja arenguriikide arengu erinevate etappide tunnustamiseks WTO eeskirjade kehtestamist ning rõhutab, et globaalses kaubanduses edu saavutamiseks vajab G90, kaasa arvatud suur hulk Saharast lõuna poole jäävaid Aafrika riike uut kokkulepet, mis sisaldaks suurenenud abi, kaubandustingimuste muutmist ning soodustingimustel maailmaturule sisenemist lihtsustavat süsteemi, sealhulgas ka kaubanduspoliitika kasutamist vaesuse vastu võitlemise ja majanduse arengu soodustamise nende riiklike strateegiate osana;
7. calls for the WTO rules to recognise the different stages of development of poor and developing countries, and stresses that, in order to succeed in global trade, the G90, including the vast majority of Sub-Saharan African countries, require a new deal including increased aid flows, changing terms of trade and a system facilitating inclusion in the world market on preferential terms, including the use of trade policies as part of their national strategies to tackle poverty and kick start their economies;
8. mõistab hukka selle, et kokkulepe ei sisalda rakendamise küsimuse konkreetsemat sõnastust ning eri- ja diferentseeritud kohtlemise põhimõtte läbivaatamist; nõuab, et EÜ ja teised WTO arenenud liikmesriigid suurendaksid pingutusi, et tagada vaatluse all olevate artiklite olulisi tegeliku majandusliku väärtusega arendusi;
8. deplores that the Agreement did not provide stronger language on the "implementation" issue and the review of the Special and Differential (S&D) Treatment; calls for increased efforts on the part of the EC and other developed WTO members to offer substantial improvements of real economic value to the articles under review;
9. mõistab hukka, et kokkuleppes ei mainita kaubanduse liberaliseerimise võimalikke keskkonna- ja sotsiaalseid mõjusid, eriti just NAMA jaos, kus läbirääkimised võivad tuua kaasa edasise deindustrialiseerimise vaestes, eriti just Aafrika riikides, sundides neid rohkem sõltuma loodusvarade mittesäästvast ja kahjulikust ekspordist;
9. deplores that the Agreement makes no mention of the potential environmental and social implications of trade liberalisation, particularly in the NAMA section, where negotiations may result in further de-industrialisation in poor countries, especially those in Africa, forcing them to rely more heavily on unsustainable and harmful exports of natural resources;
10. rõhutab, et kõige vaesemate riikide suutlikkuse suurendamist tuleb kindlustada tehnilise abi osutamisega, mille eesmärk on tugevdada nende kaubandus- ja ekspordivõimsust ning mitmekesistada nende tootmisbaase;
10. stresses that capacity building for the poorest countries needs to be reinforced by means of technical assistance to strengthen their commercial and exporting capacity and to diversify their production bases;
11. märgib, et kokkulepe soovitab teenustesektori edasist avamist, kuid ei anna vastust vähimarenenud riikide vajadusele saada tollimaksuvaba ja kvootideta juurdepääs arenenud riikide turgudele;
11. notes that the Agreement recommends further opening up the services sector, but does not respond to the need of the least developed countries for duty-free and quota-free access to developed-country markets;
12. rõhutab, et eri- ja diferentseeritud kohtlemise põhimõtte kohaldamine arengumaadele peaks moodustama WTO kokkulepete olulise osa; asjaomased sätted peaksid olema selged ning koostatud eesmärgiga asjakohase tehnilise ja finantsabi abil edendada kaubandusest tingitud arengut;
12. stresses that the application of S&D to developing countries should form an integral part of the WTO Agreements; the relevant provisions should be clear and designed to promote trade-induced development through appropriate technical and financial assistance ;
13. toob esile, et teenustesektori avamise läbirääkimised ei tohiks sotsiaalsete ja arengueesmärkide saavutamisel ohustada riikide suutlikkust reguleerida põhiteenuseid ning peaksid kokkuleppest eemaldama sellised põhiteenused nagu haridus, vesi, tervishoid ja energia;
13. points out that the negotiations on the opening up of the service sectors should not threaten the ability of countries to regulate basic services in the pursuit of social and development goals, and should exempt from the Agreement essential services such as education, water, health, and energy;
14. rõhutab, et Doha arenguprogrammi tuleb vaadelda osana WTO pikaajalisest reformist, mis hakkab tagama arengut ning et ehkki kokkulepe on väike samm võrdsemate võimaluste tagamisel, sisaldab see väga vähe arenguriikide ainulaadseid vajadusi ja takistusi käsitlevaid sätteid;
14. stresses that the Doha Development Agenda must be seen as part of a longer term process of reform of the WTO, so that it starts to deliver on development, and that, although the Agreement represents a timid step towards a more level playing field, it contains very few provisions addressing the unique needs and obstacles faced by developing countries;
15. tõstab esile, et WTO Doha vooru edukas lõpetamine peab ülemaailmset majanduskasvu toetades aitama kaasa millenniumi arengueesmärkide saavutamisele;
15. points out that a successful conclusion of the WTO Doha Round will have to contribute to achieving the Millennium Development Goals by bolstering worldwide economic growth;
16. kordab, et vaesust ei ole võimalik vaid abiga vähendada; nõuab seetõttu järgmiste meetmete võtmist, mis aitavad koos kaubanduspoliitika meetmetega kaasa vaesuse tegelikule vähendamisele arenguriikides:
16. reiterates that poverty cannot be reduced by aid alone; calls therefore for the following measures, which - together with measures in the field of trade policies - may contribute to genuine poverty reduction in developing countries:
– väikeettevõtete loomine ja arendamine, millel on juurdepääs maailma ja kohalikele turgudele soodustingimustel; turunduse, hankimise, ärijuhtimise ja keskkonnateadlikkuse alase nõustamise pakkumine;
– creating and developing small businesses with access to world and local markets on preferential terms; provision of working capital on preferential terms; provision of advice on marketing, sourcing, business administration, and environmental awareness;
– kroonilise halva tervisliku seisundi ja lühikese eluea küsimuste lahendamine, alustades odavatest ja lihtsatest suure arvatava mõjuga sekkumismeetmetest, mida on võimalik kohe rakendada, näiteks sääsevõrgud, seep, nõustamine seoses põhiliste hügieeninõuetega, kondoomid ja vaktsiinid; need sekkumismeetmed tuleb lisada pikaajalisse poliitikaraamistikku;
– tackling chronic ill-health and short life-spans, starting with cheap and simple interventions with a high potential impact that can be immediately implemented , such as mosquito nets, soap, advice on basic hygiene, condoms and vaccines; these interventions need to be embedded in a long term policy framework;
– põhihariduse tagamine kõikidele lastele, pöörates erilist tähelepanu tüdrukutele, kes kannatavad ebaproportsionaalselt haridusele juurdepääsu puudumise all;
– ensuring that all children receive a basic education, with special attention to girls who suffer disproportionately from lack of access to education;
– laste töö vähendamine ja kaotamine;
– reducing and eventually eliminating child labour;
– elanikkonna organiseerimine, nii et rohkem inimesi tegutseks ettevõtjatena ning elanikkonna kasv ei oleks enam üks ohtudest;
– organising populations so that more people become economic actors and population-growth ceases to be a threat;
– ettevõtete sotsiaalse vastutustunde (ESV) soodustamine ning tööhõivet, tervishoidu ja haridust tagavate ESV programmide toetamine;
– encouraging corporate social responsibility (CSR), and supporting CSR programmes delivering employment, health, and education;
– lõuna–lõuna suunalise koostöö eelistamine, mis koosneb nõustamisest, kaupade pakkumisest ja teenuste osutamisest;
– giving preference to South-South cooperation in the provision of advice, goods, and services;
– kodanikukonfliktide vähendamine, rõhutades, et õigusriik kehtib kõigi suhtes;
– reducing civil conflict by insisting that the rule of law applies to everyone;
Doha vooru hindamine WTOs 1. augustil 2004. aastal sõlmitud kokkuleppe järel
Evaluering af Doha-udviklingsrunden efter WTO-aftalen af 1. august 2004
Vastutav komisjon
Korresponderende udvalg
Nõuandev komisjon istungil teada andmise kuupäev
Rådgivende udvalg Dato for meddelelse på plenarmødet
Tõhustatud koostöö
Udvidet samarbejde
nimetamise kuupäev
Ordfører Dato for valg
Arutamine komisjonis
Behandling i udvalg
Ettepanekute vastuvõtmise kuupäev
Dato for vedtagelse af forslag
Lõpphääletuse tulemused
Resultat af den endelige afstemning
Lõpphääletuse ajal kohal olnud liikmed
Til stede ved den endelige afstemning - medlemmer
Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Nirj Deva, Michael Gahler, Jana Hyb?šková, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Luisa Morgantini, Józef Pinior, José Ribeiro e Castro, Toomas Savi, Jürgen Schröder, Anna Záborská, Jan Zahradil og Mauro Zani.
Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Nirj Deva, Michael Gahler, Jana Hyb?škov?, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Mart?nez Martínez, Luisa Morgantini, Józef Pinior, José Ribeiro e Castro, Toomas Savi, Jürgen Schröder, Anna Záborská, Jan Zahradil og Mauro Zani.
Lõpphääletuse ajal kohal olnud asendusliikmed
Til stede ved den endelige afstemning - stedfortrædere
In spite of the failure of the Cancún Ministerial Conference, negotiations concerning the Doha Development Agenda have continued and the member countries of the World Trade Organisation have shown their determination to complete the work programme with the adoption by the General Council of a series of decisions on 2 August 2004 covering all areas of negotiation.
In spite of the failure of the Cancún Ministerial Conference, negotiations concerning the Doha Development Agenda have continued and the member countries of the World Trade Organisation have shown their determination to complete the work programme with the adoption by the General Council of a series of decisions on 2 August 2004 covering all areas of negotiation.
With regard to agriculture, the WTO members have decided on a framework for establishing modalities.
With regard to agriculture, the WTO members have decided on a framework for establishing modalities.
However, this agreement is only one stage in the process launched at the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha.
However, this agreement is only one stage in the process launched at the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha.
The European Union must now ensure that it participates fully in the new stages, namely in establishing the modalities of negotiations with a view to reaching a possible agreement on them at the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference in December 2005, in accordance with the mandate given by the Council and approved by the European Parliament.
The European Union must now ensure that it participates fully in the new stages, namely in establishing the modalities of negotiations with a view to reaching a possible agreement on them at the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference in December 2005, in accordance with the mandate given by the Council and approved by the European Parliament.
The European Union played a fundamental role in reaching the August 2004 agreement thanks to the efforts of Community producers in applying a series of common agricultural policy reforms.
The European Union played a fundamental role in reaching the August 2004 agreement thanks to the efforts of Community producers in applying a series of common agricultural policy reforms.
In order that the Doha Round should not present them with further constraints, it is essential that the principles of the CAP reform are taken into account in the forthcoming negotiations.
In order that the Doha Round should not present them with further constraints, it is essential that the principles of the CAP reform are taken into account in the forthcoming negotiations.
The implementation of new commitments will also need to be sufficiently flexible - in terms of both deadlines and modalities – so as not to destabilise the common organisation of markets.
The implementation of new commitments will also need to be sufficiently flexible - in terms of both deadlines and modalities – so as not to destabilise the common organisation of markets.
At the same time, the Commission must act within the multilateral framework to make room for the concerns voiced by developing countries, especially the poorest countries and those with a fragile economy sensitive to the consequences of trade liberalisation.
At the same time, the Commission must act within the multilateral framework to make room for the concerns voiced by developing countries, especially the poorest countries and those with a fragile economy sensitive to the consequences of trade liberalisation.
Põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjon palub vastutaval rahvusvahelise kaubanduse komisjonil lisada oma resolutsiooni ettepanekusse järgmised ettepanekud:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Euroopa Parlament
The European Parliament,
4. rõhutab, et põllumajanduse arengut, toiduohutust ja maamajanduse arengut silmas pidades on tundlike toodete kindlaksmääramine Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikidele eriti oluline;
Stresses that the designation of vulnerable products is particularly important for the Member States of the European Union from the point of view of agricultural development, food safety and the development of the rural economy;
7. nõuab parema kaitsesüsteemi väljatöötamist siiani äärmiselt suurel arvul pettusi põhjustanud eelistussüsteemi ärakasutamise vastu;
Calls for the development of a better system of protection against abuse of the preference system, which has been hitherto extremely susceptible to fraud;
10. kinnitab taas vajadust, et Genfis toimuvatesse läbirääkimistesse kaasataks Euroopa Liidu nõuded seoses geograafiliste tähiste, põllumajanduse multifunktsionaalse laadi ja mitteäriliste kaalutlustega, nagu näiteks keskkonnakaitse, loomade heaolu, ettevaatusprintsiip ning kohustuslik märgistamine; nõuab seetõttu, et komisjon teostaks järelevalvet nimetatud põhimõtete sisseviimise üle põllumajanduskokkuleppesse;
Reaffirms the need for the negotiations under way in Geneva to take into account the European Union's demands with regard to protected geographical indications, the multifunctional nature of agriculture and non-trade concerns such as environmental protection, animal welfare, the precautionary principle and compulsory labelling; calls on the Commission, therefore, to ensure that these principles can be incorporated into the Agriculture Agreement;
12. väljendab rahulolu vähemarenenud riikide mureküsimuste arvesse võtmise üle, vabastades nad siduvatest kohustustest; võtab arvesse, et antud raamistikus on hädavajalik, et kõik tööstusriigid ja arenevad riigid võtaksid kohustusi seoses vähemarenenud riikidest pärit toodete turulepääsuga, mis vastaksid Euroopa Liidu 2001. aasta algatuse "kõik, välja arvatud relvad" raames võetud kohustustele; tuletab meelde oma seotust arenguriikidele partnerlus- või koostöölepingute raames omistatud eelistuste säilitamise osas;
Welcomes the fact that the concerns of the least developed countries have been taken into account and they have been exempted from binding commitments; considers that, in this context, it is essential that all industrialised and emerging countries undertake commitments in relation to market access for products from the least developed countries equivalent to those undertaken by the European Union in 2001 through its 'Everything But Arms' initiative; reiterates its commitment to maintaining the preferences granted to developing countries in the partnership and cooperation agreements;
14. arvab, et rahuldavat tulemust on võimalik saavutada vaid kõikide Euroopa institutsioonide tiheda koostöö abil ning palub seetõttu nõukogul ja komisjonil ennast tulevastest aruteludest teavitada ja nendesse kaasata.
Considers that a satisfactory outcome can be obtained only by means of close cooperation between all the European institutions and, with this in mind, calls on the Council and the Commission to keep it well informed and closely involved in the coming discussions.
Doha vooru hindamine WTOs 1. augustil 2004. aastal sõlmitud kokkuleppe järel
Assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004
Javier Moreno Sánchez, 14.9.2004
Javier Moreno Sánchez, 14.9.2004
Danutė Budreikaitė, Sa?d El Khadraoui, Elisa Ferreira, Antol?n Sánchez Presedo
Danutė Budreikaitė, Saïd El Khadraoui, Elisa Ferreira, Antolín Sánchez Presedo
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1868/94, millega kehtestatakse kartulitärklise tootmise kvoodisüsteem
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1868/94 establishing a quota system in relation to the production of potato starch
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0772 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0772 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikleid 36 ja 37, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga ( C6‑0014/2005 );
– having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0014/2005 ),
– võttes arvesse põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjoni raportit ( A6‑0096/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0096/2005 ),
Euroopa Parlamendi muudatusettepanek
Amendments by Parliament
(2) Vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 1868/94 artikli 3 lõikele 2 on kohane jagada kvoot tootjaliikmesriikidele kolmeks aastaks vastavalt komisjoni poolt nõukogule esitatud aruandele.
(2) Under Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1868/94 the three-yearly quota must be allocated among producer Member States on the basis of a report from the Commission to the Council.
Seega tuleks võtta arvesse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika hiljutist muutust ja tootmist , mis toimub riikides, kes liitusid ühendusega 1. mail 2004 , ning oodates esimesi mõjusid sellele sektorile, pikendada kaheaastaseks piiratud perioodiks 2004/2005. turustusaastal kehtinud kvoote .
The recent changes in the common agricultural policy and in production in the Member States which joined the Community on 1 May 2004 should be taken into account to this end and, pending indication of the initial effects on the sector, the existing quotas for the 2004/05 marketing year should be rolled over for two more years .
(2) Vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 1868/94 artikli 3 lõikele 2 on kohane jagada kolme aasta kvoot tootjaliikmesriikidele vastavalt komisjoni poolt nõukogule esitatud aruandele.
(2) Under Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1868/94 the three-yearly quota must be allocated among producer Member States on the basis of a report from the Commission to the Council.
Seega tuleks võtta arvesse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika hiljutist muutust ja kartulitärklise tootmist, mis toimub riikides, kes liitusid ühendusega 1. mail 2004.
The recent changes in the common agricultural policy and in potato starch production in the Member States which joined the Community on 1 May 2004 should be taken into account to this end.
Sellest lähtuvalt tuleb kehtivat kvoodisüsteemi pikendada neljaks järgmiseks turustusaastaks.
The existing quota system should therefore be rolled over for the next four marketing years.
Nimetatud kvoodisüsteemi raames tuleks eelkõige kümne uue liikmesriigi huve arvestades luua võimalus kvootide piiriüleseks tasaarveldamiseks.
This quota system should allow for the possibility of transnational balancing-out with priority being given to the ten new Member States.
(3) Tootjaliikmesriigid peavad jagama oma kvoodi kaheks aastaks kõigi kartulitärklist tootvate ettevõtjate vahel 2004/2005. turustusaasta pikendatud kvootide alusel.
(3) Producer Member States should allocate their quotas for a period of two years among all potato starch manufacturers on the basis of the quotas for the 2004/05 marketing year.
(3) Tootjaliikmesriigid peavad jagama oma kvoodi neljaks aastaks kõigi kartulitärklist tootvate ettevõtjate vahel 2004 . /2005. turustusaasta kvootide alusel.
(3) Producer Member States should allocate their quotas for a period of four years among all potato starch manufacturers on the basis of the quotas for the 2004/05 marketing year.
Kartulitärklist tootvatele liikmesriikidele määratakse kvoodid 2005/2006. ja 2006/2007. turustusaastateks vastavalt lisale.
The potato-starch producing Member States shall be allocated quotas for the 2005/06 and 2006/07 marketing years in accordance with the Annex hereto.
Kartulitärklist tootvatele liikmesriikidele määratakse kvoodid 2005 . /2006., 2006 . /2007. , 2007./2008. ja 2008./2009. . turustusaastateks vastavalt lisale.
The potato-starch producing Member States shall be allocated quotas for the 2005/06 , 2006/07 , 2007/08 and 2008/09 marketing years in accordance with the Annex hereto.
Artikli 2 lõike 2 esimene lõik
Article 2, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1
Iga lisas osutatud liikmesriik jagab talle 2005/2006. ja 2006/2007. turustusaastateks määratud kvoodi tärklisevabrikutele kasutuseks vastavalt igale tärklisevabrikule 2004/2005. turustusaastal eraldatud alamkvootidele, arvestades teise lõigu tingimuste kohaldamist.
Each producer Member State referred to in the Annex shall allocate its quota among potato starch manufacturers for use in the 2005/06 and 2006/07 marketing years on the basis of the sub-quotas available to each manufacturer in 2004/05, subject to application of the second subparagraph.
Iga lisas osutatud tootjaliikmesriik jagab talle 2005 . /2006., 2006 . /2007. , 2007./2008. ja 2008./2009. turustusaastateks määratud kvoodi kartulitärklist tootvate ettevõtjate vahel vastavalt igale ettevõtjale 2004 . /2005. turustusaastal eraldatud alamkvootidele, arvestades teise lõigu sätete kohaldamist.
Each producer Member State referred to in the Annex shall allocate its quota among potato starch manufacturers for use in the 2005/06 , 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09 marketing years on the basis of the sub-quotas available to each manufacturer in 2004/05, subject to application of the second subparagraph.
Komisjon esitab nõukogule hiljemalt 30. septembril 2006 aruande kvootide jaotumisest ühenduses koos asjakohaste ettepanekutega.
The Commission shall present the Council, no later than 30 September 2006 , with a report on the allocation of quota within the Community, accompanied by appropriate proposals.
See aruanne võtab arvesse võimalikke muudatusi toetussummade maksmises kartulikasvatajatele ning samuti kartulitärklise ja teraviljatärklise turu arengut.
This report shall take account of any changes in the payments to potato producers and of developments on the potato starch and cereal starch markets.
Liikmesriigid teavitavad asjaosalisi isikuid sektori jaoks vastuvõetud eeskirjadest hiljemalt 31. jaanuaril 2007 .
No later than 31 January 2007 the Member States shall notify those concerned of the detailed rules adopted for the sector.