natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These interruptions, some of which stretch over several months, pose a whole series of problems for the fishing industry, with vessels lying idle, crews unemployed and no way of supplying products for buyers on the Community markets.
These interruptions, some of which stretch over several months, pose a whole series of problems for the fishing industry, with vessels lying idle, crews unemployed and no way of supplying products for buyers on the Community markets.
Objective and analysis of the proposal
Objective and analysis of the proposal
With the aim of avoiding these problems, and given that provisional application is no longer a solution in an increasing number of cases, the Commission has submitted this proposal for a regulation which will allow the European Union to ask the third country to issue licences authorising the fleet to fish on the date laid down in the exchange of letters, even if the Council decision has not yet been adopted.
With the aim of avoiding these problems, and given that provisional application is no longer a solution in an increasing number of cases, the Commission has submitted this proposal for a regulation which will allow the European Union to ask the third country to issue licences authorising the fleet to fish on the date laid down in the exchange of letters, even if the Council decision has not yet been adopted.
This will avoid the situation where, once the protocol has finally been adopted by the Council, a fresh waiting period begins while the Commission forwards the licence applications and the third country authorises them, so that in theory the fleet would already be able to start fishing pending the adoption of the Council act.
This will avoid the situation where, once the protocol has finally been adopted by the Council, a fresh waiting period begins while the Commission forwards the licence applications and the third country authorises them, so that in theory the fleet would already be able to start fishing pending the adoption of the Council act.
Bearing in mind the inconvenience caused to firms by any interruption of fishing activities, your rapporteur cannot but warmly welcome the Commission proposal and call for its entry into force as soon as possible.
Bearing in mind the inconvenience caused to firms by any interruption of fishing activities, your rapporteur cannot but warmly welcome the Commission proposal and call for its entry into force as soon as possible.
Nevertheless, the situation is far from satisfactory and your rapporteur would appeal for a more stable solution to be found which would avoid having to continue to invent new combinations of provisional procedures.
Nevertheless, the situation is far from satisfactory and your rapporteur would appeal for a more stable solution to be found which would avoid having to continue to invent new combinations of provisional procedures.
First we had provisional application, now we have the issuing of licences in advance, but what shall we do next, unless a solution is found to the Community's slow administrative workings?
First we had provisional application, now we have the issuing of licences in advance, but what shall we do next, unless a solution is found to the Community's slow administrative workings?
When Community citizens and businesses complain about the red tape sometimes found in third countries, situations such as this do nothing to help improve our image, quite apart from the damage caused to those directly affected.
When Community citizens and businesses complain about the red tape sometimes found in third countries, situations such as this do nothing to help improve our image, quite apart from the damage caused to those directly affected.
It should be pointed out that the delays have reached a point where in some cases the Council act does not arrive in time to pay the first instalment of the financial contribution.
It should be pointed out that the delays have reached a point where in some cases the Council act does not arrive in time to pay the first instalment of the financial contribution.
This is at the very least regrettable even when it does not cause greater harm, for example when the third country grows tired of waiting for the payment and decides to withhold licences from the fleet, as occurred in the case of Angola, creating a situation which can only be described as serious.
This is at the very least regrettable even when it does not cause greater harm, for example when the third country grows tired of waiting for the payment and decides to withhold licences from the fleet, as occurred in the case of Angola, creating a situation which can only be described as serious.
It should also be borne in mind that, except where the initial negotiating process has taken an inordinate amount of time, or where there are delays in issuing licences, the third country is entirely innocent but nevertheless also has to bear the consequences: it has no access to financial compensation, it cannot make a start on the planned partnership measures, seamen from the third country cannot embark and in many cases activities in unloading areas and refrigerated stores come to a standstill, as may local processing firms which depend upon the Community fleet for supplies.
It should also be borne in mind that, except where the initial negotiating process has taken an inordinate amount of time, or where there are delays in issuing licences, the third country is entirely innocent but nevertheless also has to bear the consequences: it has no access to financial compensation, it cannot make a start on the planned partnership measures, seamen from the third country cannot embark and in many cases activities in unloading areas and refrigerated stores come to a standstill, as may local processing firms which depend upon the Community fleet for supplies.
Rapporteur's proposals: a commitment to speed up procedures
Rapporteur's proposals: a commitment to speed up procedures
As part of this draft report, your rapporteur proposes that Parliament make contact with the Commission to seek a formula which, through a mutual commitment, would make it possible to speed up the procedures involving the two institutions so that the time which elapses between the signing of the protocol and its adoption by the Council is made as short as possible and both provisional application and the advance issuing of licences become no more than safeguard mechanisms in exceptional cases.
As part of this draft report, your rapporteur proposes that Parliament make contact with the Commission to seek a formula which, through a mutual commitment, would make it possible to speed up the procedures involving the two institutions so that the time which elapses between the signing of the protocol and its adoption by the Council is made as short as possible and both provisional application and the advance issuing of licences become no more than safeguard mechanisms in exceptional cases.
A commitment would be sought to the effect that, whenever a fisheries protocol arrives in the in-tray, it would be processed immediately, further action would be taken without delay and procedures would be kept to a minimum, without of course neglecting any of the steps required to guarantee transparency.
A commitment would be sought to the effect that, whenever a fisheries protocol arrives in the in-tray, it would be processed immediately, further action would be taken without delay and procedures would be kept to a minimum, without of course neglecting any of the steps required to guarantee transparency.
The rapporteur has consulted the Commission, which has been highly receptive to the setting of time limits agreed between the two institutions.
The rapporteur has consulted the Commission, which has been highly receptive to the setting of time limits agreed between the two institutions.
This would prevent significant problems for both the fleet and the third country's industry, as well as avoiding the impression that, when it comes to bureaucracy and sluggishness, the EU is as much a developing country as many of those we seek to help improve.
This would prevent significant problems for both the fleet and the third country's industry, as well as avoiding the impression that, when it comes to bureaucracy and sluggishness, the EU is as much a developing country as many of those we seek to help improve.
With these remarks, your rapporteur urges that Parliament should approve the Commission proposal.
With these remarks, your rapporteur urges that Parliament should approve the Commission proposal.
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 3317/94, mis käsitleb kalastuslubade taotluste edasiandmist kolmandatele riikidele
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 3317/94 as regards the transmission of applications for fishing licences to third countries
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu otsus, millega võimaldatakse tulevasest Euroopa naaberluse ja partnerluse rahastamisvahendist toetust saavatel riikidel saada abi tehnilise abi ja teabevahetuse programmi (TAIEX) raames
on the proposal for a Council decision enabling countries eligible for the future European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) to benefit from the Technical Assistance and Information Exchange Programme (TAIEX)
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule ( KOM(2005)0321 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0321 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 181a lõiget 2, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris Euroopa Parlamendiga ( C6‑0283/2005 );
– having regard to Article 181a(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0283/2005 ),
– võttes arvesse väliskomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0388/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0388/2005 ),
(-1) Liidu ühise välis- ja julgeolekupoliitika üks eesmärke on arendada ja tugevdada demokraatiat, õigusriigi põhimõtteid ning inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste austamist.
(-1) It is an objective of the common and foreign security policy of the Union to develop and consolidate democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Nõukogu 23. juuli 1996. aasta määruse (EÜ) 1488/1996 (Euroopa-Vahemere partnerluse raames toimuva majandus- ja sotsiaalstruktuuride reformiga kaasnevate finants- ja tehniliste meetmete (MEDA) kohta) ja nõukogu 29. detsembri 1999. aasta määruse (EÜ, Euratom) 99/2000 (abi andmise kohta partnerriikidele Ida-Euroopas ja Kesk-Aasias (TACIS)) kohaldamisel võib komisjon kooskõlas finantsmääruse artikli 54 lõikega 2 otsustada anda avaliku võimu teostamisega seotud ülesandeid, eelkõige käesolevale otsusele järgnevaid eelarve täitmisega seotud ülesandeid, üksustele, kes rakendavad TAIEX programmi, mida rakendatakse nõukogu 18. detsembri 89. aasta määruse (EMÜ) 3906/1989 (teatavatele Kesk- ja Ida-Euroopa riikidele antava majandusabi kohta (PHARE)), nõukogu 5. detsembri 2000. aasta määruse (EÜ) 2666/2000 (mis käsitleb Albaania, Bosnia ja Hertsegoviina, Horvaatia, Jugoslaavia Liitvabariigi ning endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi abistamist (CARDS)) ja nõukogu 17. detsembri 2001. aasta määruse (EÜ) 2500/2001 (milles käsitletakse ühinemiseelset finantsabi Türgile) alusel.
For the purposes of implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1488/1996 of 23 July 1996 concerning financial and technical measures to accompany the reform of economic and social structures in the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (MEDA) and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom ) No 99/2000 of 29 December 1999 concerning the provision of assistance to the partner States in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (Tacis), the Commission may, in accordance with Article 54 (2) of the Financial Regulation, decide to entrust tasks of public authority, and in particular budget implementation tasks following from this Decision, to the body implementing the TAIEX programme implemented under Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on economic aid to certain countries of Central and Eastern Europe (PHARE), Council Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000 of 5 December 2000 on assistance for Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (CARDS), and Council Regulation (EC) No 2500/2001 of 17 December 2001 concerning pre-accession financial assistance for Turkey.
Käesolevat otsust ei kohaldata määruse 99/2000 alusel rakendatud meetmete suhtes, mis kuuluvad Euratomi asutamislepingu reguleerimisalasse.
This Decision does not apply to actions implemented under Regulation (EC) No 99/2000 that fall within the scope of the Euratom Treaty.
Asjakohaselt võetakse arvesse vajadust vältida vahendite ebaproportsionaalset eraldamist mis tahes üksikule riigile, kahjustades teiste partnerite õigustatud vajadusi.
Due regard shall be paid to the need to avoid the disproportionate allocation of funding to any individual country, to the detriment of the legitimate needs of other partners.
Hinnangutes käsitletakse nii haldusstruktuuride kui ka rahastatud tegevuse tõhusust, läbipaistvust ja aruandekohustust.
Evaluations shall address the effectiveness, transparency and accountability both of management structures and of funded activities.
This proposal is therefore a transitional measure, designed to allow funding of suitable activities in the period up to the entry into force of the new framework regulation.
This proposal is therefore a transitional measure, designed to allow funding of suitable activities in the period up to the entry into force of the new framework regulation.
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu otsus, millega võimaldatakse tulevasest Euroopa naaberluse ja partnerluse rahastamisvahendist toetust saavatel riikidel saada abi tehnilise abi ja teabevahetuse programmi (TAIEX) raames
Proposal for a Council decision enabling countries eligible for the future European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) to benefit from the Technical Assistance and Information Exchange Programme (TAIEX)
Konsulteerimine Euroopa majandus- ja sotsiaalkomiteegaistungil otsuse tegemise kuupäev
Parliament to consult European Economic and Social Committee – date decided in plenary
Nõukogu aastaaruanne Euroopa Parlamendile ÜVJP peamiste aspektide ja põhiliste valikuvõimaluste, sealhulgas nende rahalise mõju kohta Euroopa ühenduste üldeelarvele – 2004
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities - 2004
nõukogu aastaaruande kohta Euroopa Parlamendile ÜVJP peamiste aspektide ja põhiliste valikuvõimaluste, sealhulgas nende rahalise mõju kohta Euroopa ühenduste üldeelarvele – 2004
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities - 2004
– võttes arvesse nõukogu aastaaruannet (7961/2005 PESC 272 FIN 117 PE 70);
– having regard to the annual report from the Council (7961/2005 PESC 272 FIN 117 PE 70),
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi, nõukogu ja komisjoni vahel 6. mail 1999 sõlmitud institutsioonidevahelist kokkulepet eelarvemenetluse parandamise ja eelarvedistsipliini kohta
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
EÜT C 172, 18.6.1999, lk 1. , eriti selle lõiget 40;
OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p.1. , and in particular paragraph 40 thereof,
– võttes arvesse 16.–17. juunil 2005 Brüsselis kokku tulnud Euroopa Ülemkogu eesistujariigi järeldusi ja eriti selle deklaratsiooni Euroopa põhiseaduse lepingu ratifitseerimise kohta;
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 16-17 June 2005 and in particular to its declaration on the ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe,
– võttes arvesse oma 12. jaanuari 2005. aasta resolutsiooni Euroopa põhiseaduse lepingu kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 12 January 2005 on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
– võttes arvesse oma 14. aprilli 2005. aasta resolutsiooni ühise välis- ja julgeolekupoliitika rakendamisel tehtud edusammude kohta (2003)
– having regard to its resolution of 14 April 2005 on the progress achieved in the implementation of the common foreign and security policy (2003)
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0132 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0132 . ,
– võttes arvesse oma 14. aprilli 2005. aasta resolutsiooni Euroopa julgeolekustrateegia kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 14 April 2005 on the European Security Strategy
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0133 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0133 . ,
– võttes arvesse oma 9. juuni 2005. aasta resolutsiooni Ühinenud Rahvaste Organisatsiooni reformi kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on the reform of the United Nations
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0237 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0237 . ,
– võttes arvesse oma 6. juuli 2005. aasta resolutsiooni ülemaailmse üleskutse kohta: vaesuse minevikuks muutmine
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the Global Call to Action: Making Poverty History
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0289 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0289 . ,
– võttes arvesse oma 26. mai 2005. aasta resolutsiooni ELi ja Venemaa suhete kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 26 May 2005 on EU-Russia relations
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0207 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0207 . ,
– võttes arvesse oma 9. juuni 2005. aasta resolutsiooni atlandiüleste suhete kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on Transatlantic relations
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0238 . ning viimasel ELi ja USA tippkohtumisel Washington DCs 20. juunil 2005 vastu võetud kaheksat ühisdeklaratsiooni;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0238 . and to the eight joint declarations resulting from the last EU-US Summit in Washington DC on 20 June 2005,
– võttes arvesse oma 23. oktoobri 2003. aasta resolutsiooni rahu ja väärikuse kohta Lähis-Idas
– having regard to its resolution of 23 October 2003 on peace and dignity in the Middle East
– võttes arvesse oma 27. jaanuari 2005. aasta resolutsiooni olukorra kohta Lähis-Idas
– having regard to its resolution of 27 January 2005 on the situation in the Middle East
– võttes arvesse oma 6. juuli 2005. aasta resolutsiooni Euroopa Liidu ja Iraagi ning nende suhete arendamise raamistiku kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the European Union and Iraq - A framework for engagement
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0288 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0288 . ,
– võttes arvesse oma 28. aprilli 2005. aasta resolutsiooni inimõiguste aastaaruande kohta maailmas 2004. aastal ja Euroopa Liidu poliitika kohta inimõiguste valdkonnas
– having regard to its resolution of 28 April 2005 on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2004 and the EU's policy on the matter
Vastu võetud tekstid , P6_TA(2005)0150 . ;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0150 . ,
– võttes arvesse väliskomisjoni raportit ( A5-0389/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A5-0389/2005 ),
A. arvestades, et nõukogu säilitab jätkuvalt a posterkori -lähenemisviisi, mis seisneb selles, et ta edastab üksnes kirjeldava nimekirja eelmisel aastal läbi viidud ÜVJP tegevustest, selle asemel et konsulteerida parlamendiga eelnevalt, nagu on ette nähtud Euroopa Liidu lepingu artiklis 21 ja 6. mai 1999. aasta institutsioonidevahelise kokkuleppes;
A. whereas the Council continues to maintain the a posteriori approach of merely submitting a descriptive list of CFSP activities carried out in the previous year, instead of consulting Parliament beforehand as provided for in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union and the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999,
B. arvestades, es parlament on korduvalt palunud nõukogul asendada see tava tõelise parlamendiga konsulteerimisega tagamaks, et parlamendi seisukohtadel on reaalne mõju järgmiseks aastaks tehtavatele valikutele;
B. whereas Parliament has repeatedly asked the Council to replace this practice with a genuine consultation of Parliament in order to ensure that Parliament's views have a real impact on the choices made for the following year,
C. arvestades, et vastavalt Brüsselis 16.–17. juunil 2005 kokku tulnud Euroopa Ülemkogu otsusele peaks põhiseaduse lepingu ratifitseerimisprotsessis võetud järelemõtlemisaeg nüüd käima käsikäes kehtivate lepingute optimaalse rakendamisega, et viia ellu ÜVJP, mis on suuteline astuma kindlalt vastu tänapäeva maailma ähvardustele ja väljakutsetele ning tulema toime ülejäänud maailma ees võetud kohustustega;
C. whereas the period of reflection on the process of ratification of the Constitutional Treaty, as decided on by the Brussels European Council of 16-17 June 2005, should now go hand in hand with the optimum implementation of the existing treaties in order to achieve a CFSP capable of facing up to the global responsibilities, threats and challenges of today's world,
D. arvestades, et parlament on korduvalt väljendanud seisukohta, et liidu suhted kõikide kolmandate riikide ja piirkondadega peaksid olema asjakohasel tasandil, võttes arvesse liidu huve, asjaomaste kolmandate riikide ja piirkondade lähedust Euroopa mudelile ja väärtustele ning tõsiasja, et liidust on saamas üks tähtsamaid geopoliitilisi osalejaid maailmaareenil ning seetõttu vajab ta tugevaid ja usaldusväärseid poliitilisi ja majanduspartnereid;
D. whereas Parliament has repeatedly expressed its view that the Union's relations with each third country and region should be at an appropriate level, taking into account the interests of the Union, the closeness of each third country and region to the European model and values and the fact that the Union is becoming one of the major geopolitical actors on the world stage and therefore needs strong and reliable political and economic partners,
E. arvestades, et demokraatia ning õigusriigi arendamine ja tugevdamine ning inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste austamine on liidu ühise välis- ja julgeolekupoliitika üldised eesmärgid;
E. whereas developing and consolidating democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms are general objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the EU,
F. arvestades, et usaldusväärsuse tagamiseks peab ÜVJPle ja ESDPle eraldama eelarve, mis oleks kooskõlas nende ambitsioonidega, ja mõistes hukka asjaolu, et käesoleval ajal on nende kahe poliitikavaldkonna jaoks eraldatud vahendid jäänud ebapiisavaks; viimasena avaldab kahetsust, et Euroopa Liidu sõjaliste operatsioonide rahastamine on endiselt liialt sageli väljaspool demokraatlikku kontrolli,
F. whereas in order to be credible the CFSP and ESDP must be allocated budgets which are commensurate with their ambitions, and deploring the fact that, at present, the financial resources allocated to those two policies remain insufficient; regretting, finally, the fact that the funding of military operations by the European Union is still too frequently outside democratic control,