natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This publication shall be made in the Official Journal of the European Union for
This publication shall be made in the Official Journal of the European Union for
authorisations concerning Article 12(2)(b) and for all other authorisations in any appropriate manner which makes the necessary information available in a timely way to any person interested in the process.
authorisations concerning Article 12(2)(b) and for all other authorisations in any appropriate manner which makes the necessary information available in a timely way to any person interested in the process.
The competent authority shall ensure that full documentation is communicated to interested parties requesting it.
The competent authority shall ensure that full documentation is communicated to interested parties requesting it.
The documentation given to potential providers shall include at least the following elements:
The documentation given to potential providers shall include at least the following elements:
authorisation criteria adopted in accordance with Article 7(2) as well as selection criteria;
authorisation criteria adopted in accordance with Article 7(2) as well as selection criteria;
award criteria that define the grounds on which the authority will make its choice from among the proposals meeting the selection criteria;
award criteria that define the grounds on which the authority will make its choice from among the proposals meeting the selection criteria;
regulatory and organisational conditions for the provision of the service, including the requirements that the authorisation will cover and identifying any tangible and intangible assets to be placed at the disposal of the selected service provider together with the relevant terms and applicable rules;
regulatory and organisational conditions for the provision of the service, including the requirements that the authorisation will cover and identifying any tangible and intangible assets to be placed at the disposal of the selected service provider together with the relevant terms and applicable rules;
penalties and the terms governing cancellation in the event of non-compliance; and
penalties and the terms governing cancellation in the event of non-compliance; and
the authorisation period.
the authorisation period.
The procedure shall provide for an interval of at least 52 days between the dispatch of the call for proposals and the latest date for receiving them.
The procedure shall provide for an interval of at least 52 days between the dispatch of the call for proposals and the latest date for receiving them.
For each procedure, the competent authority shall make public the decision resulting from the selection procedure.
For each procedure, the competent authority shall make public the decision resulting from the selection procedure.
Where as a result of a selection procedure no suitable service provider could be found for a specific port service, the managing body of the port may, under the conditions of Article 19, reserve the provision of this service for itself for a period, which may not exceed five years, following which a new selection procedure for granting an authorisation shall be launched.
Where as a result of a selection procedure no suitable service provider could be found for a specific port service, the managing body of the port may, under the conditions of Article 19, reserve the provision of this service for itself for a period, which may not exceed five years, following which a new selection procedure for granting an authorisation shall be launched.
The managing body of the port shall be compensated by the newly selected service provider for all relevant investments it made during this period, which has not yet been fully amortised and which the newly selected service provider takes over, taking into account the overall economic balance of the service provided during the previous period, according to clear and pre-established criteria.
The managing body of the port shall be compensated by the newly selected service provider for all relevant investments it made during this period, which has not yet been fully amortised and which the newly selected service provider takes over, taking into account the overall economic balance of the service provided during the previous period, according to clear and pre-established criteria.
Compromise 7
Compromise 7
Member States shall enact provisions whereby newly authorised service providers are required to pay compensation to the former service provider, corresponding to the fair market value of the former service provider’s port undertaking, or at least to the current market value of the immovable assets and the comparable movable capital assets, if this is higher than the market value of the undertaking.
Member States shall enact provisions whereby newly authorised service providers are required to pay compensation to the former service provider, corresponding to the fair market value of the former service provider’s port undertaking, or at least to the current market value of the immovable assets and the comparable movable capital assets, if this is higher than the market value of the undertaking.
If the newly authorised service provider takes on none or only some of the previous service provider’s personnel, he shall participate in the costs of the social plan of the previous service provider.
If the newly authorised service provider takes on none or only some of the previous service provider’s personnel, he shall participate in the costs of the social plan of the previous service provider.
Article 15(3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Article 15(3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Compromise 8
Compromise 8
This Article shall apply to any authorisation in existence on the date on which this Directive enters into force.
This Article shall apply to any authorisation in existence on the date on which this Directive enters into force.
Where the number of providers of port services in a port is not limited pursuant to Article 8, existing authorisations may remain in force unchanged until such time as the number becomes limited.
Where the number of providers of port services in a port is not limited pursuant to Article 8, existing authorisations may remain in force unchanged until such time as the number becomes limited.
Where the number of providers of port services in a port is limited, existing authorisations may remain in force unchanged until they expire, but within the periods provided for in Article 12 reckoned from the date of transposition of this Directive.
Where the number of providers of port services in a port is limited, existing authorisations may remain in force unchanged until they expire, but within the periods provided for in Article 12 reckoned from the date of transposition of this Directive.
Where the number of providers of port services in a port becomes limited after the date of entry into force of this Directive, existing authorisations may remain in force unchanged until they expire, but within the periods provided for in Article 12 reckoned from the date of appearance of such limitation.
Where the number of providers of port services in a port becomes limited after the date of entry into force of this Directive, existing authorisations may remain in force unchanged until they expire, but within the periods provided for in Article 12 reckoned from the date of appearance of such limitation.
The competent authority shall, within a period of one year following transposition of the Directive, complete an assessment of all existing authorisations within the port and on the maritime access routes under its jurisdiction.
The competent authority shall, within a period of one year following transposition of the Directive, complete an assessment of all existing authorisations within the port and on the maritime access routes under its jurisdiction.
Compromise 9
Compromise 9
Article 11 paragraph 4
Article 11 paragraph 4
Technical-nautical services as defined in Article 3 paragraph 6 are excluded from the provisions of this article for reasons of port security and safety and public service requirements.
Technical-nautical services as defined in Article 3 paragraph 6 are excluded from the provisions of this article for reasons of port security and safety and public service requirements.
Compromise 10
Compromise 10
Article 12
Article 12
Authorisations shall be granted and concluded for a limited but renewable period of time which is in proportion to the investments made by the service providers, allowing a normal return on these investments.
Authorisations shall be granted and concluded for a limited but renewable period of time which is in proportion to the investments made by the service providers, allowing a normal return on these investments.
The following maximum durations shall apply:
The following maximum durations shall apply:
In cases where no investments which are considered significant by the competent authority in order to carry out the provision of services are involved, the maximum duration of its authorisation shall be 10 years.
In cases where no investments which are considered significant by the competent authority in order to carry out the provision of services are involved, the maximum duration of its authorisation shall be 10 years.
In cases where investments which are considered significant by the competent authority involve:
In cases where investments which are considered significant by the competent authority involve:
(a) movable assets, the maximum period shall be 15 years;
(a) movable assets, the maximum period shall be 15 years;
(b) immovable assets and comparable movable capital assets, such as container bridges, ship-to-shore gantry cranes and bridge unloaders, the maximum period shall be 36 years, irrespective of whether or not their ownership will revert to the managing body of the port.
(b) immovable assets and comparable movable capital assets, such as container bridges, ship-to-shore gantry cranes and bridge unloaders, the maximum period shall be 36 years, irrespective of whether or not their ownership will revert to the managing body of the port.
If the investments made by the service provider include both movable and immovable assets, the maximum period shall be the longer of the maximum periods considered.
If the investments made by the service provider include both movable and immovable assets, the maximum period shall be the longer of the maximum periods considered.
Member States may establish a procedure which allows a service provider who intends to make or irrevocably contract for significant investments in immovable assets during the last 10 years before the end of the existing authorisation and can demonstrate that these investments will lead to an improvement in the overall efficiency of the service concerned, to request the competent authority to launch a selection procedure in accordance with Article 8 for a new authorisation before the authorisation in question expires or to extend the existing authorisation for a period of 10 years once during the last 10 years of validity of the authorisation.
Member States may establish a procedure which allows a service provider who intends to make or irrevocably contract for significant investments in immovable assets during the last 10 years before the end of the existing authorisation and can demonstrate that these investments will lead to an improvement in the overall efficiency of the service concerned, to request the competent authority to launch a selection procedure in accordance with Article 8 for a new authorisation before the authorisation in question expires or to extend the existing authorisation for a period of 10 years once during the last 10 years of validity of the authorisation.
Competent authorities shall make public, for the general information of the sectors concerned in the Community the authorisations which are going to expire, at least one year before their date of expiry.
Competent authorities shall make public, for the general information of the sectors concerned in the Community the authorisations which are going to expire, at least one year before their date of expiry.
Compromise 11
Compromise 11
Technical-nautical services
Technical-nautical services
With regard to the technical-nautical services, Member States may submit the granting of the authorisation referred to in Article 7 to particularly strict criteria relating to maritime safety and public service requirements.
With regard to the technical-nautical services, Member States may submit the granting of the authorisation referred to in Article 7 to particularly strict criteria relating to maritime safety and public service requirements.
The competent authorities may also recognise the compulsory nature of pilotage and prescribe such organisational rules for the service as they deem appropriate for reasons of safety and of public service requirements, including, when the circumstances in a port or a group of ports and/or its access so require, the possibility of reserving for themselves the service in question or assigning it, directly if appropriate, to a single provider.
The competent authorities may also recognise the compulsory nature of pilotage and prescribe such organisational rules for the service as they deem appropriate for reasons of safety and of public service requirements, including, when the circumstances in a port or a group of ports and/or its access so require, the possibility of reserving for themselves the service in question or assigning it, directly if appropriate, to a single provider.
In particular they may require that such service be provided by competent persons meeting equitable and non-discriminatory conditions laid down in national law.
In particular they may require that such service be provided by competent persons meeting equitable and non-discriminatory conditions laid down in national law.
Where exemption from compulsory pilotage or the exemption of certain categories of vessel from compulsory pilotage, possibly through pilotage exemption certificates, is subject to special authorisation, the conditions for this authorisation must be appropriate, objective, transparent and non-discriminatory, taking account of the various special conditions and constraints of the different ports on the basis of which the authorisations are given.
Where exemption from compulsory pilotage or the exemption of certain categories of vessel from compulsory pilotage, possibly through pilotage exemption certificates, is subject to special authorisation, the conditions for this authorisation must be appropriate, objective, transparent and non-discriminatory, taking account of the various special conditions and constraints of the different ports on the basis of which the authorisations are given.
Member States shall report to the Commission no later than five years following the entry into force of this Directive on measures to improve the effectiveness of technical-nautical services.
Member States shall report to the Commission no later than five years following the entry into force of this Directive on measures to improve the effectiveness of technical-nautical services.
Compromise 12
Compromise 12
Transparency of State funding
Transparency of State funding
The Commission shall draw up, no later than one month from the date of the entry into force of this Directive, common guidelines for funding given to ports by Member States or out of public funds and shall indicate which funding to ports is compatible with the internal market.
The Commission shall draw up, no later than one month from the date of the entry into force of this Directive, common guidelines for funding given to ports by Member States or out of public funds and shall indicate which funding to ports is compatible with the internal market.
The guidelines shall be subject to evaluation 3 years after entry into force of this directive.
The guidelines shall be subject to evaluation 3 years after entry into force of this directive.
Compromise 13
Compromise 13
Recital 34
Recital 34
Regulation of self-handling should be left to national rules and arrangements.
Regulation of self-handling should be left to national rules and arrangements.
In cases where a Member State has already thought fit or thinks fit to authorise it, self-handling should not serve to undermine the degree of protection afforded under the rules on health and safety at work or lower the standard of worker training.
In cases where a Member State has already thought fit or thinks fit to authorise it, self-handling should not serve to undermine the degree of protection afforded under the rules on health and safety at work or lower the standard of worker training.
tööhõive- ja sotsiaalkomisjoni arvamus
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
Transpordi- ja turismikomisjonile
for the Committee on Transport and Tourism
Tööhõive- ja sotsiaalkomisjon palub vastutaval transpordi- ja turismikomisjonil, soovitada direktiivi ettepaneku tagasilükkamist ning kutsuda komisjoni üles esitama direktiivi ettepanekut vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi kodukorra artiklile 39 sadamatevahelise läbipaistvuse ja võrdsete turutingimuste kohta.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to recommend rejection of the proposal for a directive and to request the Commission, in accordance with Rule 39, to submit a proposal for a directive on transparency and equal market conditions between ports.
Die Europäische Kommission macht nicht deutlich, dass es einen unzureichenden Zugang zum Markt für Hafendienste gibt.
The European Commission does not make clear that there is insufficient access to the market of port services.
Der Vorschlag der Kommission untergräbt die einzelstaatlichen Regelungen und führt zu einer größeren Rechtsunsicherheit für alle Betroffenen.
The Commission proposal undermines national rules and brings more legal insecurity for all concerned.
Der Vorschlag wird nicht zu faireren Wettbewerbsbedingungen zwischen den Häfen führen.
The proposal shall not lead to more equal competition conditions between ports.
Das Parlament hatte ernste Bedenken in Bezug auf die möglichen sozialen und ökologischen Auswirkungen der Vorschläge für die Selbstabfertigung und die Lotsendienste geäußert.
The Parliament expressed serious concerns about the possible social and environmental consequences of the proposals on self handling and pilotage.
Da die Kommission diese Bedenken nicht in Betracht gezogen und keine Anhörung der wichtigsten Beteiligten organisiert hat, schlagen wir vor, diesen neuen Vorschlag abzulehnen und der Kommission damit ein klares Signal zu geben, dass eine ernsthafte Anhörung aller Beteiligten organisiert werden muss, bevor ein Vorschlag angenommen wird.
As the Commission has not taken into account these concerns and has not organised a consultation with the most important stakeholders, we propose to reject this new proposal giving a clear signal to the Commission that serious consultation with all stakeholders has to be organised before adopting a proposal.
Wie dies vom Europäischen Parlament bereits gefordert wurde, sollte im Mittelpunkt der Richtlinie als Hauptziel vor allem der Wettbewerb zwischen den Häfen und nicht innerhalb der Häfen stehen.
As stated by the European Parliament the main objective of the Directive should concentrate on competition between the ports rather than within ports.
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv turulepääsu kohta sadamateenuste valdkonnas
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on market access to port services
Jan Andersson, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Sepp Kusstatscher, Thomas Mann, Mario Mantovani, Ana Mato Adrover, Ria Oomen-Ruijten und Anne Van Lancker
Jan Andersson, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Sepp Kusstatscher, Thomas Mann, Mario Mantovani, Ana Mato Adrover, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Anne Van Lancker
Mihael Brejc, Udo Bullmann, Gintaras Didžiokas, Marian Harkin, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Elisabeth Schroedter, Marc Tarabella und Georgios Toussas
Mihael Brejc, Udo Bullmann, Gintaras Didžiokas, Marian Harkin, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Elisabeth Schroedter, Marc Tarabella, Georgios Toussas
Vittorio Agnoletto, Bairbre de Brún, Eva Lichtenberger und Erik Meijer
Vittorio Agnoletto, Bairbre de Brún, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer
SISETURU- JA TARBIJAKAITSEKOMISJONI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv turulepääsu kohta sadamateenuste valdkonnas
On the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on market access to port services
Die Infrastruktur im Hafen spielt natürlich eine große Rolle, wenn die Schiffe gut an den Kaianlagen angekommen sind, jedoch ist die Wahl eines Hafens in erster Linie unabhängig von den internen Voraussetzungen des Hafens.
Intra-port infrastructure obviously plays a major role once the vessel has docked, but the choice of port is not made primarily on the basis of the internal qualities of the port.
Siseturu- ja tarbijakaitsekomisjon palub vastutaval transpordi- ja turismikomisjonil komisjoni ettepanek tagasi lükata.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to reject the Commission proposal.
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv turulepääsu kohta sadamateenuste valdkonnas
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Market Access to Port Services
Vote on the legislative resolution in TRAN Committee: 26:24.
Vote on the legislative resolution in TRAN Committee: 26:24.
Komisjoni neljas aruanne liidu kodakondsuse kohta (1. mai 2001 kuni 30. aprill 2004)
on the Commission's Fourth report on Citizenship of the Union (1 May 2001 – 30 April 2004)
PÕHISEADUSKOMISJONI ARVAMUS ................................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................11
PETITSIOONIKOMISJONI ARVAMUS ................................................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................15
ETTEPANEK VÕTTA VASTU EUROOPA PARLAMENDI RESOLUTSIOON
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
komisjoni neljanda aruande kohta, mis käsitleb liidu kodakondsust (1. mai 2001 kuni 30. aprill 2004)
on the Commission's Fourth report on Citizenship of the Union (1 May 2001 – 30 April 2004)
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartat ja eriti selle V jaotist "Kodanike õigused";
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Chapter V thereof entitled 'Citizens' Rights',
– võttes arvesse 15. ja 16. oktoobril 1999. aastal toimunud Euroopa Ülemkogu Tampere istungi järeldusi;
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Tampere European Council meeting of 15 and 16 October 1999,
– võttes arvesse komisjoni neljandat aruannet liidu kodakondsuse kohta (1. mai 2001 kuni 30. aprill 2004) ( KOM(2004)0695 );
– having regard to the Commission's Fourth Report on Citizenship of the Union (1 May 2001 – 30 April 2004) ( COM(2004)0695 ),
– võttes arvesse komisjoni teatist sisserände, integratsiooni ja tööhõive kohta, milles komisjon esitas oma seisukoha illegaalsete sisserändajate naturaliseerimise kohta ( KOM(2003)0336 );
– having regard to the Commission communication on immigration, integration and employment, in which the Commission sets out its position on the naturalisation of illegal immigrants ( COM(2003)0336 ),