natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The rapporteur proposes that Parliament should basically abide by its initial position, whereby shipping emissions would be reduced by approximately 80% compared with the year 2000, whereas the Council position would serve to reduce them by no more than about 10%.
The rapporteur proposes that Parliament should basically abide by its initial position, whereby shipping emissions would be reduced by approximately 80% compared with the year 2000, whereas the Council position would serve to reduce them by no more than about 10%.
For the reasons listed above and set out in more detail in the decision taken by Parliament at first reading, the latter is not enough to protect human health and the environment or achieve the EU’s approved air quality targets.
For the reasons listed above and set out in more detail in the decision taken by Parliament at first reading, the latter is not enough to protect human health and the environment or achieve the EU’s approved air quality targets.
The Council position would clean up emissions only in the SO x emission control areas, in other words the North Sea, the English Channel, and the Baltic Sea.
The Council position would clean up emissions only in the SO x emission control areas, in other words the North Sea, the English Channel, and the Baltic Sea.
Heavy fuel oil made from crude containing less sulphur would be used in those areas.
Heavy fuel oil made from crude containing less sulphur would be used in those areas.
However, the sulphur content of fuel used in other EU sea areas, the Mediterranean and the North-East Atlantic, would probably be higher than before.
However, the sulphur content of fuel used in other EU sea areas, the Mediterranean and the North-East Atlantic, would probably be higher than before.
In any event, the impact of sulphur and nitrogen oxides on cultural monuments and the harmful health effects of all shipping emissions likewise extend to the Mediterranean area and the more southern parts of Europe as a whole.
In any event, the impact of sulphur and nitrogen oxides on cultural monuments and the harmful health effects of all shipping emissions likewise extend to the Mediterranean area and the more southern parts of Europe as a whole.
The Commission is working out scenarios for future air quality requirements under the CAFE (Clean Air For Europe) programme.
The Commission is working out scenarios for future air quality requirements under the CAFE (Clean Air For Europe) programme.
The rapporteur has asked it to gauge the impact on air quality that could be brought about by enforcing marine fuel purity requirements in accordance with the proposal.
The rapporteur has asked it to gauge the impact on air quality that could be brought about by enforcing marine fuel purity requirements in accordance with the proposal.
In its proposal the Commission has estimated that the benefits would be more than double the costs.
In its proposal the Commission has estimated that the benefits would be more than double the costs.
But there is also reason to suppose that the benefits could likewise exceed the costs if a 0.5% marine fuel sulphur limit were imposed in SO x emission control areas, that is to say, the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the English Channel, and in other EU sea areas as well, namely the North-East Atlantic and the Mediterranean.
But there is also reason to suppose that the benefits could likewise exceed the costs if a 0.5% marine fuel sulphur limit were imposed in SO x emission control areas, that is to say, the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the English Channel, and in other EU sea areas as well, namely the North-East Atlantic and the Mediterranean.
The RAINS model, developed by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), has been used, among other things, to draw up the NEC directive and the CAFE programme.
The RAINS model, developed by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), has been used, among other things, to draw up the NEC directive and the CAFE programme.
The benefits calculated using that model could be as much as seven or eight times greater than the costs.
The benefits calculated using that model could be as much as seven or eight times greater than the costs.
The Beicip-Franlab model puts a higher figure on the costs than the RAINS model.
The Beicip-Franlab model puts a higher figure on the costs than the RAINS model.
But even in that case the estimated benefits amount for the most part to more than double the costs.
But even in that case the estimated benefits amount for the most part to more than double the costs.
The rapporteur maintains that it is important to make progress in the IMO, but to enable that to happen, the EU should point the way forward.
The rapporteur maintains that it is important to make progress in the IMO, but to enable that to happen, the EU should point the way forward.
Under unilateral decisions the EU has banned single-hulled tankers and ship bottom models containing organic tin compounds.
Under unilateral decisions the EU has banned single-hulled tankers and ship bottom models containing organic tin compounds.
The United States is also seeking to tighten up IMO agreements.
The United States is also seeking to tighten up IMO agreements.
It has laid down a 15 ppm (0.0015 %) sulphur limit in its territorial waters for all ships bar ocean-going vessels.
It has laid down a 15 ppm (0.0015 %) sulphur limit in its territorial waters for all ships bar ocean-going vessels.
In addition, together with Canada and Mexico, it is drawing up a proposal to the IMO to tighten up the fuel sulphur limit to apply in SO x emission control areas (SECAs) by lowering it from 1.5% to 0.1%.
In addition, together with Canada and Mexico, it is drawing up a proposal to the IMO to tighten up the fuel sulphur limit to apply in SO x emission control areas (SECAs) by lowering it from 1.5% to 0.1%.
By incorporating a second stage into the reform, going further than Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention, the EU would create its own pressure to improve the IMO agreements.
By incorporating a second stage into the reform, going further than Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention, the EU would create its own pressure to improve the IMO agreements.
It is important to promote the development of new and better environmental technology by creating a market for it.
It is important to promote the development of new and better environmental technology by creating a market for it.
The rapporteur is therefore proposing several possible ways of implementing the new purity requirements.
The rapporteur is therefore proposing several possible ways of implementing the new purity requirements.
The emission reduction corresponding to the use of cleaner fuel could also be achieved by purifying ship combustion gases, on the understanding that the purification waste would have to be treated in an environmentally appropriate way.
The emission reduction corresponding to the use of cleaner fuel could also be achieved by purifying ship combustion gases, on the understanding that the purification waste would have to be treated in an environmentally appropriate way.
By purifying the combustion gases on board, it would be possible to remove not only sulphur oxides, but also other noxious substances, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter.
By purifying the combustion gases on board, it would be possible to remove not only sulphur oxides, but also other noxious substances, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter.
The rapporteur also proposes that the Commission be given the powers to organise trading in shipping emissions.
The rapporteur also proposes that the Commission be given the powers to organise trading in shipping emissions.
This would provide an incentive to develop technology that would enable emissions to be reduced to even lower levels.
This would provide an incentive to develop technology that would enable emissions to be reduced to even lower levels.
The rapporteur believes that vessels at berth in EU ports should be dispensed from complying with the 0.1% sulphur limit if they are connected to a fixed electrical power supply.
The rapporteur believes that vessels at berth in EU ports should be dispensed from complying with the 0.1% sulphur limit if they are connected to a fixed electrical power supply.
To encourage the change to cleaner fuel or on-board emission purification, she proposes that a vessel should likewise be exempted from the fuel requirement applying to ships at berth if it always uses fuel with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.5% and the 0.5% sulphur limit has not yet entered into force in the sea area concerned.
To encourage the change to cleaner fuel or on-board emission purification, she proposes that a vessel should likewise be exempted from the fuel requirement applying to ships at berth if it always uses fuel with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.5% and the 0.5% sulphur limit has not yet entered into force in the sea area concerned.
Yet this last proposal was not accepted by the committee.
Yet this last proposal was not accepted by the committee.
ports and inland waterways
ports and inland waterways
1.5 % (North Sea May 2007)
1.5 % (North Sea May 2007)
0.1% (Greece derogation 2012)
0.1% (Greece derogation 2012)
RAPPORTEUR’S 2nd READING PROPOSAL
RAPPORTEUR’S 2nd READING PROPOSAL
North Sea)
North Sea)
* not adopted by the committee
* not adopted by the committee
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht, mis käsitleb Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsuse vastuvõtmist laevakütuste väävlisisaldust käsitleva direktiivi 1999/32/EÜ muutmiseks
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels
art 251 lg 2 ja art 175 lg 1 (EÜ)
Articles 251(2) and 175(1) EC
Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Henrik Lax, Marie-No?lle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Asa Westlund
Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Henrik Lax, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
David Casa, Christofer Fjellner, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Karin Jöns, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Caroline Lucas, Justas Vincas Paleckis
David Casa, Christofer Fjellner, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Karin Jöns, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Caroline Lucas, Justas Vincas Paleckis
Teema: Nõukogu ühine seisukoht, mis käsitleb Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi vastuvõtmist, millega luuakse raamistik nõuete kehtestamiseks energiat tarbivate toodete ökoprojekteerimisele ja muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 92/42/EMÜ ning Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiive 96/57/EÜ ja 2000/55/EÜ
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy-Using Products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................48
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................51
Nõukogu ühise seisukoha kohta, mis käsitleb Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi vastuvõtmist, millega luuakse raamistik nõuete kehtestamiseks energiat tarbivate toodete ökoprojekteerimisele ja muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 92/42/EMÜ ning Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiive 96/57/EÜ ja 2000/55/EÜ
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy-Using Products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
– võttes arvesse nõukogu ühist seisukohta (11414/1/2004 – C6-0246/2004 );
– having regard to the Council common position (11414/1/2004 – C6‑0246/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjoni soovitust teiseks lugemiseks ( A6‑0057/2005 );
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0057/2005 ),
VIIDE 1
CITATION 1
võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, eriti selle artiklit 95,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, eriti selle artikleid 95 ja 175 ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 and Article 175 thereof,
The purpose of the directive is primarily to protect, to a high level, health and the environment, promote reduced resource use and promote energy security through demand-side efficiency.
The purpose of the directive is primarily to protect, to a high level, health and the environment, promote reduced resource use and promote energy security through demand-side efficiency.
1 a) Ühenduse kuuenda keskkonnaalase tegevusprogrammi eesmärke püütakse saavutada ökoloogiliselt tõhusa ja säästliku tootekujunduse propageerimise, jäätmete vältimist soodustavate tegevuslike meetmete sõnastamise, nt et stimuleerida vastupidavust, korduvkasutamist ja ringlussevõttu, ning teatud ainete ja materjalide järkjärgulise kasutusest kõrvaldamisega toodetele kohaldatavate meetmete abil.
(1a) The Sixth Community Environmental Action Programme's objectives will be pursued taking into consideration the life cycle approach as applied in the Integrated Product Policy and the Community's strategy for waste management by means of, inter alia, encouraging ecologically sound and sustainable product design and the formulation of operational measures to encourage waste prevention, e.g. stimulating durability, re-use and recycling, and the phasing out of certain substances and materials through product-related measures .
The objectives of this Directive are based on the Community’s Environmental policy and as such should be appropriately recalled.
The objectives of this Directive are based on the Community’s Environmental policy and as such should be appropriately recalled.
This text is based on the objectives laid down in the Sixth Environmental Action Programme.
This text is based on the objectives laid down in the Sixth Environmental Action Programme.
2) Energiat tarbivate toodete (edaspidi ETT) arvele langeb suur osa ühendusesisesest loodusvarade ja energia tarbimisest.
(2) Energy using products ("EuPs") account for a large proportion of the consumption of natural resources and energy in the Community.
Neil on ka mitmeid muid olulisi keskkonnamõjusid.
They also have a number of other important environmental impacts.
Ülekaalukalt enamiku ühenduse turul saadaolevate tooteliikide osas võib täheldada vägagi erineval tasemel keskkonnamõjusid, olgugi et toodete funktsionaalne talitlus on sarnane.
For the vast majority of product categories available on the Community market, very different degrees of environmental impact can be noted though they provide similar functional performances.
Säästva arengu huvides tuleks soodustada nende toodete üldise keskkonnamõju pidevat parandamist, eelkõige võttes arvele peamised negatiivse keskkonnamõju allikad ja vältides reostuse igasugust ülekandumist , kui sellise parandamisega ei kaasne ülemääraseid kulusid .
In the interest of sustainable development, continuous improvement in the overall environmental impact of those products should be encouraged, notably by identifying the major sources of negative environmental impacts and avoiding transfer of pollution , when this improvement does not entail excessive costs .
Säästva arengu huvides tuleks soodustada nende toodete üldise keskkonnamõju pidevat parandamist, eelkõige võttes arvele peamised negatiivse keskkonnamõju allikad ja vältides reostuse igasugust ülekandumist.
In the interest of sustainable development, continuous improvement in the overall environmental impact of those products should be encouraged, notably by identifying the major sources of negative environmental impacts and avoiding transfer of pollution.
Partial reinstatement of Amendment 5 from first reading.
Partial reinstatement of Amendment 5 from first reading.
PÕHJENDUS 4 A (uus)
RECITAL 4 A (new)
4 a) EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 95 lõikes 3 sätestatakse, et komisjon võtab ettepanekutes aluseks keskkonna kaitstuse kõrge taseme, eriti võttes arvesse kõiki uusi teaduslikel faktidel põhinevaid suundumusi.
(4a) Article 95(3) of the Treaty requires the Commission to take as a base for its proposal a high level of environmental protection, taking account in particular of any new development based on scientific facts.
Reinstatement of Amendment 79 from first reading.
Reinstatement of Amendment 79 from first reading.
Notwithstanding the fact that Article 95 is the legal basis, it should be made clear that the attainment of high environmental standards is essential.
Notwithstanding the fact that Article 95 is the legal basis, it should be made clear that the attainment of high environmental standards is essential.
Põhjendus 7
RECITAL 7
7) Ökoprojekteerimisele esitatavate nõuete tase tuleb üldjuhul kehtestada, pidades silmas ühenduse kuuenda keskkonnaalase tegevusprogrammi eesmärke ja prioriteete, sealhulgas vajadusel nimetatud programmi vastavate temaatiliste strateegiate kohaldatavaid eesmärke .
(7) Ecodesign requirements should be set bearing in mind the goals and priorities of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, including as appropriate applicable goals of the relevant thematic strategies of that Programme.
7) Ökoprojekteerimisele esitatavate nõuete tase tuleb üldjuhul kehtestada, pidades silmas ühenduse kuuenda keskkonnaalase tegevusprogrammi eesmärke ja prioriteete, sealhulgas tulevasi eesmärke, mis tulenevad kuuenda keskkonnaalase tegevusprogrammi temaatilistest strateegiatest, milleks võivad muuhulgas olla näiteks loodusvarade säästva kasutamise temaatiline strateegia ning jäätmete vältimise ja ringlussevõtu temaatilised strateegiad, Euroopa kliimamuutuste programmi poliitilised soovitused, ÜRO kliimamuutuste raamkonventsioon ja Kyoto protokollist tulenevad kohustused, samuti pidades silmas näiteks vee raamdirektiivi, õhukvaliteedi raamdirektiivi, jäätmete raamdirektiivi ning ohtlike ja püsivate ainete raamdirektiivide, Kirde-Atlandi merekeskkonna kaitse konventsiooni (OSPAR), ühenduse kemikaalide poliitika ja ühenduse püsivate orgaaniliste saasteainete direktiivi olemasolevaid eesmärke .
(7) Ecodesign requirements should be set bearing in mind the goals and priorities of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, including forthcoming goals of the 6th EAP thematic strategies, such as the Thematic Strategy on Sustainable Use of Natural Resources and Thematic Strategies on Waste Prevention and Recycling, the ECCP policy recommendations, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol commitment and, inter alia, existing goals of the Water Framework Directive, the Air Quality Framework Directive, the Waste Framework Directive and those on hazardous and persistent substances, the OSPAR Convention and the Community Directive on Persistent Organic Pollutants.
Reinstatement of the missing part of Amendment 10 from first reading.
Reinstatement of the missing part of Amendment 10 from first reading.
PÕHJENDUS 12
RECITAL 12
12) Võib osutuda vajalikuks ja õigustatuks kehtestada mõnede toodete või nende keskkondlike aspektide osas teatud keskkonnasõbraliku tootekujunduse nõudeid koguse ja hulga osas, et vähendada nende toodete keskkonnamõjusid.
(12) It may be necessary and justified to establish specific quantified ecodesign requirements for some products or environmental aspects thereof in order to ensure that their environmental impact is minimised.
Arvestades suurt vajadust aidata kaasa Ühinenud Rahvaste Organisatsiooni kliimamuutuste raamkonventsiooni Kyoto protokolli raames võetud kohustuste täitmisele ning piiramata käesolevas direktiivis propageeritavat ühendatud lähenemist, tuleks veidi eelistada neid meetmeid, mis võimaldaks kasvuhoonegaaside tootmist väheste kuludega tunduvalt vähendada.
Given the urgent need to contribute to the achievement of the commitments in the framework of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changes (UNFCCC), and without prejudice to the integrated approach promoted in this Directive, some priority should be given to those measures with a high potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at low cost.
Sellised meetmed võivad soodustada ka ressursside säästlikku kasutamist ja olla oluline panus säästliku tootmise ja tarbimise kümne aasta programmide raamistikku, mille osas lepiti kokku 2002. aasta septembris Johannesburgis toimunud säästva arengu tippkohtumisel.
Such measures can also contribute to a sustainable use of resources and constitute a major contribution to the ten-year framework of programmes on sustainable production and consumption agreed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in September 2002.
Kohaselt tuleks tunnustada potentsiaalseid keskkonnale kasulikke mõjusid, mida võimaldab toodete, ja mitte ainult energiat tarbivate toodete, muutmine teenusteks.
Due recognition should be given to the potential environmental benefits provided - not least in the field of energy-using products - by turning products into services.
Tuleks uurida võimalusi äriringkondade sellesisulise tegevuse soodustamiseks, et toimuks muutus soovitud suunas.
Measures should be explored to stimulate action by the business community to bring about a shift in this direction.
The throughput of energy and materials could be significantly reduced in many product areas if consumer products were being turned into services instead.
The throughput of energy and materials could be significantly reduced in many product areas if consumer products were being turned into services instead.
There are many examples of this, for instance the leasing of a television service or a washing service instead of purchasing a television set and/or washing machine, or an answering machine being replaced by an answering service etc.
There are many examples of this, for instance the leasing of a television service or a washing service instead of purchasing a television set and/or washing machine, or an answering machine being replaced by an answering service etc.
By arranging services like this, dematerialisation is stimulated and producers are given a direct incentive to create products that are energy-efficient and can be easily maintained and improved over a long period of time.
By arranging services like this, dematerialisation is stimulated and producers are given a direct incentive to create products that are energy-efficient and can be easily maintained and improved over a long period of time.