natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In international terms, new vehicles produced since the start of this decade already meet high, if not optimum, standards with regard to their recyclability, re-usability and recoverability.
In international terms, new vehicles produced since the start of this decade already meet high, if not optimum, standards with regard to their recyclability, re-usability and recoverability.
Environmental protection and the degree to which vehicles are environmentally friendly are factors which influence consumers when they buy cars; as a result, they now have a bearing on competition.
Environmental protection and the degree to which vehicles are environmentally friendly are factors which influence consumers when they buy cars; as a result, they now have a bearing on competition.
The directive contains a number of provisions which are not essential to achieving the highest possible degree of environmental protection, but which would generate unnecessary administrative costs.
The directive contains a number of provisions which are not essential to achieving the highest possible degree of environmental protection, but which would generate unnecessary administrative costs.
The Commission proposal stipulates that all new vehicles must undergo the checks which make up the relevant type-approval procedure within 36 months following the entry into force of the directive.
The Commission proposal stipulates that all new vehicles must undergo the checks which make up the relevant type-approval procedure within 36 months following the entry into force of the directive.
All existing series-built vehicles, including , for example, models which are about to be replaced, would thus be required to undergo fresh checks.
All existing series-built vehicles, including , for example, models which are about to be replaced, would thus be required to undergo fresh checks.
Redesigns would be needed during the production process, seriously undermining the ability of manufacturers to deliver cars and, by extension, jeopardising their competitive position.
Redesigns would be needed during the production process, seriously undermining the ability of manufacturers to deliver cars and, by extension, jeopardising their competitive position.
In view of the existing recycling standards, referred to above, a longer transitional period which takes account of the automobile industry's normal production cycles would be appropriate.
In view of the existing recycling standards, referred to above, a longer transitional period which takes account of the automobile industry's normal production cycles would be appropriate.
A 54-month period would make sense and would have the desired effect, in that all new types which are already on the drawing board would comply with this directive.
A 54-month period would make sense and would have the desired effect, in that all new types which are already on the drawing board would comply with this directive.
From the point of view of the type-approval authorities, a 36-month period is unrealistic.
From the point of view of the type-approval authorities, a 36-month period is unrealistic.
In Europe, there are some 600 types on the market, all of which would have to undergo fresh checks during that period.
In Europe, there are some 600 types on the market, all of which would have to undergo fresh checks during that period.
It is clear that this is simply not feasible and would result in derogations being granted in individual Member States, thereby distorting the market.
It is clear that this is simply not feasible and would result in derogations being granted in individual Member States, thereby distorting the market.
The directive stipulates that, for each type of vehicle, manufacturers should provide disposal firms with a detailed description of a recycling strategy based on the technologies which are available or under development at the time the application for type-approval is submitted.
The directive stipulates that, for each type of vehicle, manufacturers should provide disposal firms with a detailed description of a recycling strategy based on the technologies which are available or under development at the time the application for type-approval is submitted.
Today, the average lifetime of a new vehicle is roughly 12 to 14 years, and in most cases it is longer.
Today, the average lifetime of a new vehicle is roughly 12 to 14 years, and in most cases it is longer.
Over the last 10 years, decisive progress has been made with disposal and recycling technologies.
Over the last 10 years, decisive progress has been made with disposal and recycling technologies.
No-one can predict today what new technologies will be developed in the future, so that a description of a recycling strategy on the basis of existing disposal technologies makes no sense.
No-one can predict today what new technologies will be developed in the future, so that a description of a recycling strategy on the basis of existing disposal technologies makes no sense.
Here is an example to illustrate that point: anyone who, in the 1980s, stipulated that data must be stored on a diskette will have problems in accessing that data using the IT technology now available.
Here is an example to illustrate that point: anyone who, in the 1980s, stipulated that data must be stored on a diskette will have problems in accessing that data using the IT technology now available.
The range of types produced by automobile manufacturers is virtually immeasurable.
The range of types produced by automobile manufacturers is virtually immeasurable.
For that reason it is essential, and also standard practice, that the type-approval authority should choose reference vehicles in agreement with the manufacturer, and not alone.
For that reason it is essential, and also standard practice, that the type-approval authority should choose reference vehicles in agreement with the manufacturer, and not alone.
In order to avoid misunderstandings, this arrangement should also be laid down in the directive.
In order to avoid misunderstandings, this arrangement should also be laid down in the directive.
The directive stipulates that components made of polymers or elastomers must be properly marked when type-approval checks are carried out.
The directive stipulates that components made of polymers or elastomers must be properly marked when type-approval checks are carried out.
This provision disregards the fact that when a new vehicle is being developed for the road small changes are often made shortly before production starts.
This provision disregards the fact that when a new vehicle is being developed for the road small changes are often made shortly before production starts.
For that reason, a more workable arrangement would be for the type-approval authority to ensure, when it carries out its checks, that the manufacturer has taken the requisite steps to mark the relevant components.
For that reason, a more workable arrangement would be for the type-approval authority to ensure, when it carries out its checks, that the manufacturer has taken the requisite steps to mark the relevant components.
Final responsibility for marking would thus lie with the manufacturer, although the type-approval authority would be able to check at any time, including during production, that the marking requirement is being met.
Final responsibility for marking would thus lie with the manufacturer, although the type-approval authority would be able to check at any time, including during production, that the marking requirement is being met.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek mootorsõidukite tüübikinnituse kohta, mis on seotud nende korduvkasutatavuse, taaskasutatavuse ja taastatavusega, ja millega muudetakse nõukogu direktiivi 70/156/EMÜ
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the type-approval of motor vehicles with regard to their re-usability, recyclability and recoverability and amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC
EÜ art 251 lg 2 ja art 95
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
EPle esitamise kuupäev
Date submitted to Parliament
Nõuandev komisjon / Nõuandvad komisjonid istungil teada andmise kuupäev
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
Teema: Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek tolueeni ja triklorobenseeni kasutusse võtmise ja kasutamise piirangute kohta (direktiivi 76/769/EMÜ 28. muudatus)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC)
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepaneku kohta, mis käsitleb tolueeni ja triklorobenseeni kasutusse võtmist ja kasutamise piiranguid (direktiivi 76/769/EMÜ 28. muudatus)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC)
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0320 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0320)
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 251 lõiget 2 ja artiklit 95, vastavalt millele Euroopa Komisjon parlamendile ettepaneku esitas ( C6‑0030/2004 );
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0030/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjoni raportit ( A6‑0005/2005 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0005/2005 ),
2. palub Euroopa Komisjonil asi uuesti parlamenti saata, kui ta kavatseb oma ettepanekut oluliselt muuta või seda teise tekstiga asendada;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Ei tohi kasutusse võtta ega kasutada mingil teisel eesmärgil, kui vaid vaheprodukti kujul valmististe aine või osana, kontsentratsiooniga 0,1% või rohkem."
May not be placed on the market or used as a substance or constituent of preparations in a concentration equal or higher than 0.1 % by mass for all uses except as an intermediate.
Ziel dieser Richtlinie ist die Einführung harmonisierter Bestimmungen im Hinblick auf Toluol und Trichlorbenzol (TCB), um gemäß Artikel 95 EG-Vertrag das Funktionieren des Binnenmarktes unter Sicherstellung eines hohen Gesundheits- und Umweltschutzniveaus zu gewährleisten.
The objective of this Directive is to introduce harmonised provisions with regard to toluene and trichlorobenzene (TCB), thus preserving the internal market whilst ensuring a high level of protection of health and the environment, as required by Article 95 of the Treaty.
Die Gesundheits- und Umweltrisiken von Toluol und TCB wurden im Rahmen der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 793/93 zur Bewertung und Kontrolle der Umweltrisiken chemischer Altstoffe bewertet.
The risks to health and the environment posed by toluene and TCB have been assessed under Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances.
Die Risikobewertungen ergaben, dass es notwendig ist, die von Toluol und TCB ausgehenden Gesundheitsrisiken zu verringern.
The risk assessments identified a need to reduce the risks to health from toluene and TCB.
Da bestimmte Verwendungen dieser Chemikalien unter bestimmten Bedingungen nicht kontrolliert werden können, kann die Sicherheit der menschlichen Gesundheit nur durch eine Beschränkung der Verwendung der betreffenden Stoffe und Zubereitungen gewährleistet werden.
Due to the fact that certain uses of these chemicals cannot be controlled under certain conditions, safety in terms of human health can only be ensured by restricting the use of the substances and preparations concerned.
Das gilt insbesondere für Verwendungen durch die Verbraucher.
That applies particularly to consumer uses.
Aufgrund seiner Lösungsfähigkeit kann Toluol in Verbrauchererzeugnissen, einschließlich Haushaltsaerosolen, Farben, Lacken und Klebstoffen, vorkommen.
Due to its solvent power toluene can be present in consumer products, including household aerosols, paints, varnishes, adhesives and glues.
Toluol ist insbesondere gefährlich, wenn es eingeatmet wird.
Toluene is particularly dangerous if breathed in.
TCB wird hauptsächlich als Zwischenprodukt bei der Herstellung von Herbiziden und als Prozesslösungsmittel in geschlossenen Systemen verwendet.
TCB is predominantly used as an intermediate in the manufacture of herbicides and as a process solvent in closed systems.
Darüber hinaus hat TCB noch andere untergeordnete Verwendungszwecke als Lösungsmittel, Farbstoffträger und Korrosionshemmstoff.
In addition, TCB has other minor uses as a solvent, a dye carrier and as a corrosion inhibitor.
Auf der Grundlage der Risikobewertungen und der empfohlenen Risikobegrenzungsstrategien schlägt die Kommission vor, das Inverkehrbringen und die Verwendung von Toluol, TCB und sie enthaltende Zubereitungen zu beschränken.
On the basis of the risk assessments and recommended risk reduction strategies the Commission is proposing that the marketing and use of toluene, TCB, and of preparations containing them, be restricted.
Empfehlung des Berichterstatters
Rapporteur's recommendation
Die vorgeschlagene Richtlinie dürfte für die Industrie und den Handel kaum Probleme mit sich bringen, da die Verwendung von Toluol und TCB in den betreffenden Fällen derzeit rückläufig ist und die Unternehmen bereits Alternativen entwickelt haben.
The proposed Directive should pose few problems for the industry or trade, as the use of toluene and TCB is declining in the cases in question, and companies have already developed alternatives.
Da der mit der vorgeschlagenen Richtlinie erzielte Nutzen dem Schutz der menschlichen Gesundheit und der Umwelt zugute käme, der Kostenaufwand gering sein dürfte, wird die Annahme der vorliegenden Richtlinie nur mit einem Änderungsantrag vorgeschlagen.
As the proposed Directive would yield benefits in terms of protecting human health and the environment and this should be achieved at little cost, it is proposed that the Directive be adopted with just one amendment.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek tolueeni ja triklorobenseeni kasutusse võtmise ja kasutamise piirangute kohta (direktiivi 76/769/EMÜ 28. muudatus)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC)
Karl-Heinz Florenz 1.9.2004
Karl-Heinz Florenz 1.9.2004
Teema: Taotlus Koldo Gorostiaga immuniteedi ja privileegide kaitsmiseks
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Koldo Gorostiaga
Koldo Gorostiaga immuniteedi ja privileegide kaitsmise taotluse kohta
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Koldo Gorostiaga
- võttes arvesse Koldo Gorostiaga taotlust tema immuniteedi kaitsmiseks seoses Prantsuse kohtus 7. juulil 2004. a toimunud menetlusega, millest teavitati 22. juuli 2004. a täiskogu istungil;
- having regard to the request by Koldo Gorostiaga for defence of his immunity in connection with legal proceedings pending before a French court, of 7 July 2004, announced in plenary sitting on 22 July 2004,
– võttes arvesse 8. aprilli 1965. a privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli artikleid 8, 9 ja 10 ja 20. septembri 1976. a Euroopa Parlamendi liikmete valimist puudutava akti artikli 6 lõiget 2;
– having regard to Articles 8, 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, of 8 April 1965, and Article 6(2) of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, of 20 September 1976,
- võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduste Kohtu 12. mai 1964. a ja 10. juuli 1986. a otsuseid
- having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Vt kohtuasja 101/63: Wagner versus Fohrmann ja Krier, EKL 1964, lk 195 ning kohtuasja 149/85: Wybot versus Faure ja teised, EKL 1986, lk 2391. ;
See Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. ,
- võttes arvesse parlamendi kodukorra artikli 6 lõiget 3 ja artiklit 7;
- having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
- võttes arvesse õigusasjade komisjoni raportit ( A6-0006/2005 );
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0006/2005 ),
A. arvestades, et Koldo Gorostiaga valiti Euroopa Parlamenti 13. juunil 1999. a toimunud viiendatel otsestel valimistel, ja arvestades et tema volitusi kontrolliti 15. detsembril 1999, ja tema ametiaeg lõppes 19. juulil 2004;
A. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga was elected to the European Parliament in the fifth direct elections held on 13 June 1999, and whereas his credentials were verified on 15 December 1999, and his term of office expired on 19 July 2004,
B. arvestades, et Koldo Gorostiaga kaebuse kohaselt arestiti teatav osa temale kuuluvast rahast Pariisi esimese astme kohtu poolt ja arvestades, et vastavalt tema väidetele oli nende summade näol tegemist talle parlamendi poolt makstud lisatasudega;
B. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga complains that a certain amount of his money was seized by the Court of First Instance of Paris and whereas he claims that these monies were allowances paid to him by Parliament,
C. arvestades, et Koldo Gorostiaga kinnitab, et väidetavalt talle kuuluva vara arestimine on privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli rikkumine;
C. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga asserts that the seizure of his alleged property constituted a violation of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities,
D. arvestades, et Koldo Gorostiaga kaebuse kohaselt olevat ta vastavalt 11. juuni 2004. a otsusele Pariisi apellatsioonikohtu teise uurimisega tegeleva koja „kohtueelse uurimise all“ ning et selle näol on tegemist privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli rikkumisega;
D. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga complains that he would have been declared "under examination" by the second investigating Chamber of the Court of Appeals of Paris, in its judgment of 11 June 2004, and that this was a violation of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities,
E. arvestades, et Koldo Gorostiaga esitatud tõenditest lähtuvalt ei ole ta parlamentaarse immuniteediga kaitstud ühegi süüdistuse eest, millest on teavitatud Euroopa Parlamendi presidenti;
E. whereas, on basis of the evidence that he has provided, Koldo Gorostiaga is not protected by Parliamentary immunity in respect of any of the claims which have been drawn to the attention of the President of the European Parliament,
otsustab mitte kaitsta Koldo Gorostiaga immuniteeti ja privileege.
Decides not to defend the immunity and privileges of Koldo Gorostiaga.
I. Facts of the case
I. Facts of the case
Taotlus Koldo Gorostiaga immuniteedi ja privileegide kaitsmise kohta
Request for the defence of the immunity and privileges of Koldo Gorostiaga
esitaja taotluse esitamise kuupäev istungil teada andmise kuupäev
Request for defence of immunity from Date of request Date announced in plenary
Koldo Gorostiaga 7 .7.2004 22.7.2004
Koldo Gorostiaga 7 .7.2004 22.7.2004
art 6 lg 3 ja art 7
Rules 6(3) and 7
Teema: ühelt poolt Euroopa Ühenduse ja selle liikmesriikide ning teiselt poolt Tšiili Vabariigi assotsiatsioonilepingu lisaprotokolli sõlmimist käsitlev nõukogu otsuse ettepanek, et võtta arvesse Tšehhi Vabariigi, Eesti Vabariigi, Küprose Vabariigi, Ungari Vabariigi, Läti Vabariigi, Leedu Vabariigi, Malta Vabariigi, Poola Vabariigi, Sloveenia Vabariigi ja Slovakkia Vabariigi ühinemist Euroopa Liiduga
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
ühelt poolt Euroopa Ühenduse ja selle liikmesriikide ning teiselt poolt Tšiili Vabariigi assotsiatsioonilepingu lisaprotokolli sõlmimist käsitleva nõukogu otsuse ettepaneku kohta, et võtta arvesse Tšehhi Vabariigi, Eesti Vabariigi, Küprose Vabariigi, Ungari Vabariigi, Läti Vabariigi, Leedu Vabariigi, Malta Vabariigi, Poola Vabariigi, Sloveenia Vabariigi ja Slovakkia Vabariigi ühinemist Euroopa Liiduga
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
– võttes arvesse nõukogu otsuse ettepanekut ( KOM(2004)0566 );
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0566 )
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artiklit 75 ja artikli 83 lõiget 7 ja artikli 43 lõiget 1;
– having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse rahvusvahelise kaubanduse komisjoni soovitust (A6‑0000/2005);
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0007/2005 ),
Ühelt poolt Euroopa Ühenduse ja selle liikmesriikide ning teiselt poolt Tšiili Vabariigi assotsiatsioonilepingu lisaprotokolli sõlmimist käsitlev nõukogu otsuse ettepanek, et võtta arvesse Tšehhi Vabariigi, Eesti Vabariigi, Küprose Vabariigi, Ungari Vabariigi, Läti Vabariigi, Leedu Vabariigi, Malta Vabariigi, Poola Vabariigi, Sloveenia Vabariigi ja Slovakkia Vabariigi ühinemist Euroopa Liiduga
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 300 lõike 3 teine lõik
Article 300(3), second subparagraph, EC Treaty
Art 83 lg 7, art 75 lg 1 ja art 43
Rules 83(7), 75(1) and 43
Art 43 lg 1 14.9.2004
Rule 43(1) 14.9.2004
Teema: Euroopa keskkonna- ja tervisealane tegevuskava 2004–2010
on the European Environment & Health Action Plan 2004-2010
EUROOPA PARLAMENDI RESOLUTSIOONI ETTEPANEK................................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...................................................3
Euroopa keskkonna- ja tervisealase tegevuskava 2004–2010 kohta
on the European Environment & Health Action Plan 2004-2010
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist nõukogule, Euroopa Parlamendile ning Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteele Euroopa keskkonna- ja tervisealase tegevuskava 2004–2010 kohta ( KOM(2004)0416 );
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on the European Environment & Health Action Plan 2004-2010 ( COM(2004)0416 ),
– võttes arvesse 31. märtsi 2004. aasta resolutsiooni Euroopa keskkonna- ja tervisestrateegia kohta
– having regard to its resolution of 31 March 2004 on a European Environment and Health Strategy
Tekst P5_TA(2004)0246 vastu võetud. ;
Text adopted, P5_TA(2004)0246 . ,
– võttes arvesse Maailma Tervishoiuorganisatsiooni tegevuskava neljandal üleeuroopalisel keskkonna- ja tervisealasel ministrite konverentsil Budapestis 23.–25. juunil 2004;
– having regard to the action plan of the World Health Organisation adopted at the Fourth Pan-European Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health held in Budapest from 23 to 25 June 2004,