natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Liikmesriigid määravad kõikide menetluste jaoks tuvastava asutuse, mis vastutab taotluste asjakohase läbivaatamise eest kooskõlas käesoleva direktiivi sätetega, eelkõige artikli 7 lõikega 2 ja artikliga 8.
Member States shall designate for all procedures a determining authority which will be responsible for an appropriate examination of the applications in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, in particular Articles 7(2) and 8.
Liikmesriigid määravad kõikide menetluste jaoks tuvastava asutuse, mis vastutab taotluste asjakohase läbivaatamise eest kooskõlas käesoleva direktiivi sätetega, eelkõige artikli 7 lõikega 2 ja artikli 10 lõikega 1.
Member States shall designate for all procedures a determining authority which will be responsible for an appropriate examination of the applications in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, in particular Articles 7(2) , 8 and 10(1) .
Artikli 3 A lõike 2 punkt b
Article 3A, paragraph 2, point (b)
b) võtta siseriiklikke julgeolekusätteid silmas pidades vastu otsus taotluse kohta tingimusel, et enne otsuse vastuvõtmist konsulteeritakse tuvastava asutusega, kas taotlejat saab nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ põhjal käsitleda pagulasena;
(b) taking a decision on the application in the light of national security provisions, provided a determining authority is consulted prior to this decision as to whether the applicant qualifies as a refugee by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;
b) võtta siseriiklikke julgeolekusätteid silmas pidades vastu otsus taotluse kohta järgides rahvusvahelisi konventsioone ning põhiõiguste ja -vabaduste hartat tingimusel, et enne otsuse vastuvõtmist konsulteeritakse tuvastava asutusega, kas taotlejat saab nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ põhjal käsitleda pagulasena;
(b) taking a decision on the application in the light of national security provisions, whilst respecting the international conventions and the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, provided a determining authority is consulted prior to this decision as to whether the applicant qualifies as a refugee by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;
As explained earlier, the autonomy of a Member State as regards public order and internal security cannot be exercised without respect for the international conventions, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and respect for the personal freedoms of all persons
As explained earlier, the autonomy of a Member State as regards public order and internal security cannot be exercised without respect for the international conventions, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and respect for the personal freedoms of all persons
Artikli 3 A lõike 2 punkt e
Article 3 A, paragraph 2, point (e)
e) keelduda artikli 35 lõigetes 2-5 sätestatud menetluse raames andmast riiki sisenemise luba vastavalt kehtestatud tingimustele ning käesolevates lõigetes sätestatule;
(e) refusing permission to enter in the framework of the procedure provided for in Article 35 (2) to (5) , subject to the conditions and as set out in these paragraphs;
e) keelduda artiklis 35 sätestatud menetluse raames andmast riiki sisenemise luba vastavalt kehtestatud tingimustele ning käesolevates lõigetes sätestatule;
(e) refusing permission to enter in the framework of the procedure provided for in Article 35, subject to the conditions and as set out in these paragraphs;
Linked to the modification of Article 35.
Linked to the modification of Article 35.
Artikli 3 A lõike 2 punkt f
Article 3 A, paragraph 2, point (f)
f) teha vastavalt artiklis 35A kehtestatud tingimustele ning sätestatule kindlaks, kas taotleja soovib siseneda või on sisenenud liikmesriiki samas artiklis määratletud turvalisest kolmandast riigist.
(f) establishing that an applicant is seeking to enter or has entered in the Member State from a safe third country pursuant to Article 35A, subject to the conditions and as set out in this Article.
The deletion of article 2 is linked to the deletion of article 35A on a "super safe" third country.
The deletion of article 2 is linked to the deletion of article 35A on a "super safe" third country.
Artikli 3 A lõige 3
Article 3A, paragraph 3
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et vastavalt lõikele 2 määratud asutuste töötajatel on nõuetekohased teadmised või nad saavad vajalikku koolitust täitmaks käesoleva direktiivi rakendamisel neile pandud kohustusi.
Member States shall ensure that where authorities are designated in accordance with paragraph 2, the personnel of such authorities have the appropriate knowledge or receive the necessary training to fulfil their obligations when implementing this Directive.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et vastavalt lõikele 2 määratud asutuste töötajatel on nõuetekohased teadmised ja koolitus , täitmaks käesoleva direktiivi rakendamisel neile pandud kohustusi.
Member States shall ensure that where authorities are designated in accordance with paragraph 2, the personnel of such authorities have the appropriate knowledge and training to fulfil their obligations when implementing this Directive.
The non-refoulement principle is the cornerstone of the Geneva Convention upon which the Tampere conclusions indicate the EU common asylum procedure will be based.
The non-refoulement principle is the cornerstone of the Geneva Convention upon which the Tampere conclusions indicate the EU common asylum procedure will be based.
Therefore it should be explicitly mentioned under basic principles and guarantees.
Therefore it should be explicitly mentioned under basic principles and guarantees.
Liikmesriigid võivad nõuda varjupaigataotluse esitamist isiklikult ja/või kindlaksmääratud kohas.
Member States may require that applications for asylum be made in person and/or at a designated place.
Teatud olukordades peaksid liikmesriigid lubama seaduslikul esindajal esitada taotlus taotleja nimel .
Member States should allow the possibility that the application is made by a legal representative on behalf of a person, in specific circumstances .
It should be possible, for example, for a person in detention to be represented by a lawyer.
It should be possible, for example, for a person in detention to be represented by a lawyer.
Saatjata laste ja teiste eriti ohualtis olukorras olevate isikute esitatud taotlused vaadatakse läbi ja nende kohta tehakse otsus esmajärjekorras vastavalt asjakohastele ametlikele ja materiaalsetele nõuetele.
Applications from unaccompanied children and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation shall be considered and decided on a priority basis and in compliance with the relevant formal and material requirements.
Esmajärjekorras peaks läbi vaatama ja otsuse tegema ka ilmselgelt põhjendatud varjupaigataotluste suhtes.
Priority shall also be given to the consideration and decision of manifestly well founded claims.
The asylum procedure should duly address the special needs of asylum-seekers who are in a particularly vulnerable situation or those who have an obviously well founded claim.
The asylum procedure should duly address the special needs of asylum-seekers who are in a particularly vulnerable situation or those who have an obviously well founded claim.
Kui ülalpeetavad täisealised on nõus enda nimel taotluse esitamisega, järgitakse kooskõlas lapse õiguse konventsiooni artikliga 3 kogu varjupaigataotluse menetluse jooksul lapse huvide põhimõtet.
In cases in which dependent adults consent to the lodging of the application on their behalf, consistent with Article 3 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the application of the best interest of the child principle shall be adhered to throughout the whole asylum procedure.
Artikli 5 lõike 4 sissejuhatav osa
Article 5, paragraph 4, introductory part
Liikmesriigid võivad siseriiklike õigusaktidega määrata kindlaks juhtumid, kus:
Member States may determine, in national legislation
Liikmesriigid võivad juhul, kui nad tegutsevad kooskõlas lapse õiguste konventsiooni artikliga 3, siseriiklike õigusaktidega määrata kindlaks juhtumid, kus:
Member States may determine, provided they act in accordance with Article 3 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), in national legislation
Artikli 5 lõike 4 punkt c
Article 5, paragraph 4, point (c)
c) esitatud varjupaigataotlust käsitatakse ka vallalise alaealise eest esitatud varjupaigataotlusena.
(c) the cases in which the lodging of an application for asylum is deemed to constitute also the lodging of an application for asylum for any unmarried minor.
The fact that a child applicant is married does not necessarily indicate that s/he is not in need of international protection.
The fact that a child applicant is married does not necessarily indicate that s/he is not in need of international protection.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et iga varjupaigataotlust esitada sooviv isik saab otsekohe ammendava teabe menetluskorra, oma õiguste ja kohustuste kohta oma emakeeles.
Member States shall ensure that each person who wishes to make an asylum application promptly receives exhaustive information about the procedure and his/her rights and obligations, in his/her own language.
The right to receive full information in a language understandable to the applicant is essential to ensure that the procedure is applied in a fair manner.
The right to receive full information in a language understandable to the applicant is essential to ensure that the procedure is applied in a fair manner.
Taotluse esitajal lubatakse jääda liikmesriiki üksnes menetluse eesmärgil kuni tuvastav asutus on vastu võtnud otsuse vastavalt III peatükis sätestatud esimese astme menetlusele.
Applicants shall be allowed to remain in the Member State, for the sole purpose of the procedure, until such time as the determining authority has made a decision in accordance with the procedures at first instance set out in Chapter III.
Õigus riiki jääda ei anna õigust saada elamisluba .
This right to remain shall not constitute an entitlement to a residence permit.
Taotluse esitajal lubatakse jääda liikmesriiki, kus ta varjupaigataotluse esitas või, kus taotlust käsitatakse kuni lõpliku otsuse langetamiseni ja edasikaebamise menetluse lõppemiseni .
Applicants shall be allowed to remain in the Member State, in which the application for asylum has been made or is being examined until a final decision has been reached and the appeals procedure exhausted.
Õigus riiki jääda ei anna õigust saada elamisluba.
This right to remain shall not constitute an entitlement to a residence permit.
Liikmesriigid võivad lõikest 1 teha erandi ainult juhul, kui on kindlaks määratud, et taotlus on selgelt alusetu või kuritahtlik.
Member States may derogate from paragraph 1 only when it has been established that the request is manifestly unfounded or clearly abusive.
Sel juhul peaks kohus või mõni sõltumatu asutus üle vaatama ja kinnitama otsuse täitmisest keeldumise, tuginedes faktidele ja edasikaebamise võimalikule edule.
In such cases, a court of law or other independent authority should review and confirm the denial of suspensive effect, based on a review of the facts and the likelihood of success on appeal.
A derogation may be possible only in cases manifestly unfounded or abusive.
A derogation may be possible only in cases manifestly unfounded or abusive.
Ilma et see piiraks artikli 23 lõike 4 punkti i kohaldamist, tagavad liikmesriigid, et varjupaigataotlusi ei lükata tagasi ega jäeta läbivaatamisest kõrvale ainult põhjusel , et neid ei esitatud niipea kui võimalik.
Without prejudice to Article 23(4)(i), Member States shall ensure that applications for asylum are neither rejected nor excluded from examination on the sole ground that they have not been made as soon as possible.
Ilma et see piiraks artikli 23 lõike 4 punkti i kohaldamist, tagavad liikmesriigid, et varjupaigataotlusi ei lükata tagasi ega jäeta läbivaatamisest kõrvale põhjusel , et neid ei esitatud niipea kui võimalik.
Without prejudice to Article 23 (4) (i), Member States shall ensure that applications for asylum are neither rejected nor excluded from examination on the grounds that they have not been made as soon as possible.
Further, in Jabari v. Turkey (ECHR) and UNCAT Committee, late submission is not inconsistent where genuine risk of persecution exists.
Further, in Jabari v. Turkey (ECHR) and UNCAT Committee, late submission is not inconsistent where genuine risk of persecution exists.
a) taotlused vaadatakse läbi ja otsused tehakse individuaalselt, objektiivselt ja erapooletult;
(a) applications are examined and decisions are taken individually, objectively and impartially;
a) taotlused vaadatakse läbi ja otsused tehakse individuaalselt, objektiivselt ja erapooletult kooskõlas käesoleva direktiivi ning inimõigusi ja pagulasi käsitleva rahvusvahelise õigusega ;
(a) applications are examined and decisions are taken individually, objectively and impartially in accordance with this Directive and international human rights and refugee law ;
b) täpset ja ajakohast teavet hangitakse erinevatest allikatest, nagu näiteks ÜRO Pagulaste Ülemkomissari Ametilt (UNHCR) üldise olukorra kohta varjupaigataotluse esitanud isiku päritoluriigis ning vajadusel transiidiriikides, mille kaudu taotleja on liikmesriiki tulnud, ning et vastav teave oleks kättesaadav taotluste läbivaatamise ja otsuste vastuvõtmise eest vastutavale personalile;
(b) precise and up-to-date information is obtained from various sources, such as information from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), as to the general situation prevailing in the countries of origin of applicants for asylum and, where necessary, in countries through which they have transited , and that such information is made available to the personnel responsible for examining applications and taking decisions;
b) täpset ja ajakohast teavet hangitakse erinevatest allikatest, nagu näiteks ÜRO Pagulaste Ülemkomissari Ametilt (UNHCR) ja teistelt kodanikuühiskonna organisatsioonidelt, mis tegutsevad taotleja päritoluriigis, üldise ühiskondliku, õigusliku ja poliitilise olukorra kohta eelkõige seoses inimõiguste ja põhivabadustega varjupaigataotluse esitanud isiku päritoluriigis ning et vastav teave oleks kättesaadav taotluste läbivaatamise ja otsuste vastuvõtmise eest vastutavale personalile;
(b) precise and up-to-date information is obtained from various sources, such as information from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other civil society organisations working in the applicants' countries of origin , as to the general civil, legal and political situation , particularly with regard to respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, prevailing in the countries of origin of applicants for asylum, and that such information is made available to the personnel responsible for examining applications and taking decisions;
Artikli 7 lõike 2 punkt c
Article 7, paragraph 2, point (c)
c) taotluste läbivaatamise ja otsuste vastuvõtmise eest vastutaval personalil oleksid vajalikud teadmised varjupaika ja pagulasi käsitlevatest õigusaktidest .
(c) the personnel examining applications and taking the decisions have the knowledge with respect to relevant standards applicable in the field of asylum and refugee law.
c) taotluste läbivaatamise ja otsuste vastuvõtmise eest vastutaval personalil oleksid vajalikud teadmised, koolitus ja juhised seoses varjupaika ja pagulasi käsitlevate õigusaktidega .
(c) the personnel examining applications and taking the decisions have the knowledge , training and instructions with respect to relevant standards applicable in the field of asylum and refugee law.
Liikmesriigid võivad ette näha eeskirjad, mis käsitlevad taotluste läbivaatamiseks vajalike dokumentide tõlkimist.
Member States may provide for rules concerning the translation of documents relevant for the examination of applications.
Liikmesriigid peavad ette nägema eeskirjad, mis käsitlevad taotluste läbivaatamiseks vajalike dokumentide tõlkimist.
Member States must provide for rules concerning the translation of documents relevant for the examination of applications.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et varjupaigataotluse kohta tehtud otsused esitatakse kirjalikult.
Member States shall ensure that decisions on applications for asylum are given in writing.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et kõik varjupaigataotluse kohta tehtud otsused esitatakse kirjalikult.
Member States shall ensure that all decisions on applications for asylum are given in writing.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et varjupaigataotluse kohta tehtud otsused esitatakse kirjalikult taotlejale arusaadavas keeles.
Member States shall ensure that decisions on applications for asylum are given in writing , in a language which the applicant understands .
Asylum seekers must be informed in a language they understand.
Asylum seekers must be informed in a language they understand.
This is particularly important in cases of rejection, so that they may be made aware of the reasons in fact or in law for the decision and of their possibilities of appeal.
This is particularly important in cases of rejection, so that they may be made aware of the reasons in fact or in law for the decision and of their possibilities of appeal.
Liikmesriigid ei pea pagulasstaatuse andmisest keeldumist otsuses põhjendama, kui taotlejale antakse staatus, mis annab talle siseriikliku ja ühenduse õiguse raames samad õigused ja eelised mis pagulasseisund nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ põhjal.
Member States need not state the reasons for not granting the refugee status in the decision where the applicant is granted a status, which offers the same rights and benefits under national and Community law as the refugee status by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC.
Sellistel juhtudel tagavad liikmesriigid, et pagulasseisundi andmisest keeldumise põhjused oleksid kirjas taotleja toimikus ning et taotlejal oleks soovi korral juurdepääs oma toimikule.
In these cases, Member States shall ensure that the reasons for not granting the refugee status are stated in the applicant's file, and that the applicant has, upon request, access to his/her file.
Sellistel juhtudel tagavad liikmesriigid, et pagulasseisundi andmisest keeldumise põhjused oleksid kirjas taotleja toimikus ning et taotlejal või tema advokaadil või seaduslikul esindajal oleks soovi korral juurdepääs tema toimikule.
In these cases, Member States shall ensure that the reasons for not granting the refugee status are stated in the applicant's file, and that the applicant or his/her lawyer or legal representative has, upon request, access to his/her file.
The applicant’s right to be kept informed at all times and in all circumstances of the progress being made in the examination of an application for asylum should never be undermined.
The applicant’s right to be kept informed at all times and in all circumstances of the progress being made in the examination of an application for asylum should never be undermined.
Above all, the applicant should be enabled to understand what is being decided about his/her case, so that he/she may have access in good time and under appropriate conditions to appeal procedures for the recognition of his/her rights.
Above all, the applicant should be enabled to understand what is being decided about his/her case, so that he/she may have access in good time and under appropriate conditions to appeal procedures for the recognition of his/her rights.
Artikli 8 lõike 2 kolmas lõik
Article 8, paragraph 2, subparagraph 3
Lisaks sellele ei pea liikmesriigid andma kirjalikku teavet eitava otsuse vaidlustamise kohta , kui taotlejat on varem teavitatud, kas kirjalikult või taotlejale sobival elektroonilisel viisil, kuidas sellist otsust vaidlustada .
Moreover, Member States need not provide information on how to challenge a negative decision in writing in conjunction with that decision where the applicant has been informed at an earlier stage either in writing or by electronic means accessible to the applicant of how to challenge such a decision .
Lisaks sellele peavad liikmesriigid andma kirjalikku teavet eitava otsuse vaidlustamise kohta .
Moreover, Member States must provide information on how to challenge a negative decision in writing in conjunction with that decision.
Artikli 9 lõike 1 punkt a
Article 9, paragraph 1, point (a)
a) varjupaigataotlejat peab teavitama keeles, mille puhul on põhjust oletada , et ta seda mõistab, sellest, millist menetlust tuleb järgida, millised on tema õigused ja kohustused menetluse ajal ning millised on võimalikud tagajärjed, kui ta ei pea kinni oma kohustustest ja ei tee koostööd ametivõimudega.
(a) they must be informed in a language which they may reasonably be supposed to understand of the procedure to be followed and of their rights and obligations during the procedure and the possible consequences of not complying with their obligations and not co-operating with the authorities.
Varjupaigataotlejat peab teavitama menetluse kestusest ning tema käsutuses olevatest vahenditest üksikasjade esitamiseks, millele on viidatud nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ artiklis 4.
They must be informed about the time-frame, as well as the means at their disposal to fulfil the obligation to submit the elements as referred to in Article 4 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC.
Teave tuleb edastada sellise ajavaruga, et varjupaigataotlejatel oleks võimalik kasutada käesoleva direktiiviga tagatud õigusi ning järgida artiklis 9A kirjeldatud kohustusi;
The information must be given in time to enable them to exercise the rights guaranteed in this Directive and to comply with the obligations described in Article 9A;
a) varjupaigataotlejat peab teavitama keeles, mille puhul on kindlalt teada , et ta seda mõistab, sellest, millist menetlust tuleb järgida, millised on tema õigused ja kohustused menetluse ajal ning millised on võimalikud tagajärjed, kui ta ei pea kinni oma kohustustest ja ei tee koostööd ametivõimudega.
(a) they must be informed in a language which they are known for certain to understand of the procedure to be followed and of their rights and obligations during the procedure and the possible consequences of not complying with their obligations and not co-operating with the authorities.
The existing wording is too vague: it must be established with certainty that those concerned understand all the information concerning their request.
The existing wording is too vague: it must be established with certainty that those concerned understand all the information concerning their request.
Artikli 9 lõike 1 punkt b
Article 9, paragraph 1, point (b)
b) varjupaigataotlejal peab olema võimalus kasutada oma juhtumi pädevale asutusele esitamisel tõlgi teenuseid alati kui see osutub vajalikuks.
(b) they must receive the services of an interpreter for submitting their case to the competent authorities whenever necessary.
Liikmesriigid peavad tõlketeenuse osutamist vajalikuks vähemalt juhul, kui tuvastav asutus palub taotlejat ilmuda küsitlusele vastavalt artiklitele 10 ja 11 ning asjakohast suhtlemist ei saa ilma nimetatud teenuseta tagada.
Member States shall consider it necessary to give these services at least when the determining authority calls upon the applicant to be interviewed as referred to in Articles 10 and 11 and appropriate communication cannot be ensured without such services.
Nimetatud juhul ja muudel juhtudel, kus pädevad asutused kutsuvad taotleja välja, makstakse teenuste eest riiklikest vahenditest;
In this case and in other cases where the competent authorities call upon the applicant, the services shall be paid for out of public funds;
b) varjupaigataotlejal peab olema võimalus kasutada oma juhtumi pädevale asutusele esitamisel kvalifitseeritud ja erapooletu tõlgi teenuseid alati, kui see osutub vajalikuks.
(b) they must receive the services of a qualified and impartial interpreter for submitting their case to the competent authorities whenever necessary.
Liikmesriigid tagavad selle teenuse osutamise kõikidel küsitluste, kaebuste arutamise ning muu suulise suhtlemise ajal pädevate asutustega, eelkõige vastavalt artiklitele 10 ja 11 ning kui asjakohast suhtlemist ei saa ilma nimetatud teenuseta tagada.
Member States shall guarantee this service during all personal interviews, appeal hearings and other verbal communications with the competent authorities, in particular as referred to in Articles 10 and 11 and when appropriate communication cannot be ensured without such services.