natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
9) Seetõttu peavad liikmesriigid jätkama jõupingutusi Rahvusvahelise Mereorganisatsiooni (IMO) raames, et saavutada ranged ja täitmisele pööratavad kokkulepped seoses ülemaailmse võitlusega kutsetunnistustega seotud pettuste vastu ning kasutusele võtma ja jõustama kindlaid meetmeid, et takistada ja karistada nende territooriumil väljastatud kutsetunnistustega seotud petturlikku tegevust.
(9) Member States should therefore pursue their efforts within the IMO to achieve strict and enforceable agreements on the world-wide combating of fraudulent practices associated with certificates of competency and take and enforce specific measures to prevent and penalise fraudulent practices associated with certificates of competency issued in their territory.
Meremeeste kutsetunnistustega seotud pettus on põhiliselt probleemiks väljaspool Euroopa Liitu.
Fraud involving certificates is mainly a problem outside the European Union.
Kuid laevad kolmandatest riikidest pärit meeskonnaga või nende riikide lippude all sõitvad laevad sisenevad ka Euroopa sadamatesse ja kujutavad seeläbi riski liidu meresõiduohutusele.
However, vessels flying the flag of, and with crews from, third countries also enter European ports and so constitute a risk to safety at sea in the Union.
Seetõttu ei piisa ELi sisesest võitlusest pettusega.
It is not therefore sufficient to combat fraud within the EU.
Liikmesriigid peaksid jätkama oma tuntavat kohalolekut IMOs kuni see eesmärk on saavutatud.
The Member States should continue to make their presence felt within the IMO to this end.
Artikli 2 punkt a
Article 2, point (a)
a) "meresõidu elukutsed" : reguleeritud ametialased tegevused, mida teevad meremehed, kes on koolitatud vähemalt vastavalt direktiivi 2001/25/EÜ I lisas sätestatud STCW konventsiooni nõuetele;
(a) “seafaring professions” means the regulated professional activities carried out by seafarers trained at least in accordance with the requirements of the STCW Convention, as laid down in Annex I to Directive 2001/25/EC;
a) "meremees" : isik , kes on koolitatud vähemalt vastavalt direktiivi 2001/25/EÜ I lisas sätestatud nõuetele;
(a) “seafarer” means a person trained at least in accordance with the requirements laid down in Annex I to Directive 2001/25/EC;
Terminit "meresõidu elukutsed" ei ole kasutatud ettepaneku tekstis kogu ulatuses.
The term ‘seafaring professions’ is not used throughout the whole of the proposal.
Seega tuleks nimetatud terminit selgitada.
The definition in question should consequently be clarified.
Artikli 2 punkt b
Article 2, point (b)
b) "tunnistus" tähendab kehtivat dokumenti vastavalt direktiivi 2001/25/EÜ artiklile 4; selle definitsiooni alla käivad kaptenite ja ohvitseride tunnistused, kinnituslehed, eritunnistused, arstitõendid, väljaõpet tõestavad dokumendid, kaasa arvatud merepraktikat tõestavad dokumendid, mis antakse välja igale meremehele vastavalt direktiivile 2001/25/EÜ;
(b) “certificate” means a valid document within the meaning of Article 4 of Directive 2001/25/EC ; covered under this definition are certificates of competency for masters and officers, endorsements, special certificates, medical certificates and documentary evidence of training, including sea service time, that are issued to any seafarer in accordance with Directive 2001/25/EC;
b) "tunnistus" tähendab mis tahes nimetusega kehtivat dokumenti , mille on välja andnud või mille on volitanud välja andma liikmesriigi pädev asutus ja mis lubab selle omanikul töötada kõnealuses dokumendis märgitud või siseriiklike õigusaktidega sätestatud ametikohal ; selle definitsiooni alla käivad kaptenite ja ohvitseride tunnistused, kinnituslehed, eritunnistused, arstitõendid, väljaõpet tõestavad dokumendid, kaasa arvatud merepraktikat tõestavad dokumendid, mis antakse välja igale meremehele vastavalt direktiivile 2001/25/EÜ;
(b) “certificate” means a valid document by whatever name it may be known, issued by or under the authority of the competent authority of a Member State, authorising the holder to serve as stated in that document or as authorised by national regulations ; included within this definition are certificates of competency for masters and officers, endorsements, special certificates, medical certificates and documentary evidence of training, including sea service time, that are issued to any seafarer in accordance with Directive 2001/25/EC;
Vahe "tunnistuse" ja "asjakohase tunnistuse" vahel ei ole ilmne.
The difference between "certificate" and "appropriate certificate" is not self-evident.
Et vältida väärtõlgendamist, peaks kasutama direktiivis 2001/25/EÜ toodud sõnastust, mitte ainult viidet sellele direktiivile.
To avoid misinterpretations, the full definition as formulated in Directive 2001/25/EC, should be given instead of just a reference to this directive.
Artikli 2 punkt c
Article 2, point (c)
c) "asjakohane tunnistus" tähendab kaptenite, ohvitseride ja sideohvitseride tunnistust vastavalt direktiivi 2001/25/EÜ artikli 1 punktile 27 ;
(c) “appropriate certificate” means a certificate of competency for masters, officers and radio officers as defined in Article 1 point 27) of Directive 2001/25/EC ;
c) "asjakohane tunnistus" tähendab kaptenite, ohvitseride ja sideohvitseride tunnistust, mis on direktiivi 2001/25/EÜ kohaselt väljaantud ja kinnitatud tunnistus, mis lubab selle seaduslikul omanikul töötada ametikohal ning täita ettenähtud vastutustasandiga seotud ülesandeid asjaomase reisi jooksul laeval, mille liik, tonnaaž, võimsus ja asjaomased peamasinad vastavad tunnistusel kindlaksmääratule ;
(c) “appropriate certificate” means a certificate of competency for masters, officers and radio officers issued and endorsed in accordance with Directive 2001/25/EC and entitling the lawful holder thereof to serve in the capacity and perform the functions involved at the level of responsibility specified therein on a ship of the type, tonnage, power and means of propulsion concerned while engaged on the particular voyage concerned ;
Kõik liikmesriigid tunnustavad teise liikmesriigi poolt liikmesriikide kodanikele või mittekodanikele antud vastavaid kutsetunnistusi või muid meremehe kutsetunnistusi vastavalt direktiivis 2001/25/EÜ kindlaksmääratud nõuetele.
Every Member State shall recognise the appropriate certificates or any other certificate of seafarers awarded to nationals or non-nationals of Member States by another Member State in accordance with the requirements laid down in Directive 2001/25/EC.
Kõik liikmesriigid tunnustavad ühe kuu jooksul alates tunnustamise taotluse kättesaamisest teise liikmesriigi poolt liikmesriikide kodanikele või mittekodanikele antud vastavaid kutsetunnistusi või muid meremehe kutsetunnistusi vastavalt direktiivis 2001/25/EÜ kindlaksmääratud nõuetele.
Every Member State shall , within one month of receiving an application for a recognition, recognise the appropriate certificates or any other certificate of seafarers awarded to nationals or non-nationals of Member States by another Member State in accordance with the requirements laid down in Directive 2001/25/EC.
Artikli 3 lõige 1 a (uus)
Article 3, paragraph 1a (new)
Liikmesriigid tagavad õiguse vastavalt artiklile 1 vastu võetud või vastu võtmata tunnustamise otsuseid lõikes 1 toodud aja jooksul edasi kaevata siseriikliku õigusloomega ja menetlustega ettenähtud kohtusse või tribunali.
Member States shall guarantee a right of appeal against recognition decisions taken pursuant to paragraph 1, or the absence thereof within the period laid down therein, before a court or a tribunal in accordance with national legislation and procedures.
Muudatusettepanek selgitab tunnistuste tunnustamise nõudmised.
The amendment clarifies the requirements for recognition of certificates.
3) Põhjendatud kahtluse korral võib vastuvõttev liikmesriik nõuda teise liikmesriigi pädevatelt asutustelt kirjalikku kinnitust meremehe kutsetunnistuste autentsuse kohta, vastavaid kinnituslehti või mõnda muud selles teises liikmesriigis välja antud dokumentaalset kinnitust väljaõppest.
3) In the event of justified doubts, the host Member State may require of the competent authorities of another Member State to furnish written confirmation of the authenticity of seafarers’ certificates, corresponding endorsements or any other documentary evidence of training issued in that other Member State.
3) Vastuvõtva liikmesriigi nõudel peavad teise liikmesriigi pädevad asutused väljastama kirjaliku kinnituse või eituse meremehe kutsetunnistuse autentsuse kohta, vastavad kinnituslehed või mõne muu selles teises liikmesriigis välja antud dokumentaalse kinnituse väljaõppest.
3) At the request of a host Member State , the competent authorities of another Member State must furnish written confirmation or denial of the authenticity of seafarers’ certificates, corresponding endorsements or any other documentary evidence of training issued in that other Member State.
Käesolev sõnastus on liiga ebatäpne.
The existing wording is too loose.
Direktiiv peab liikmesriikidelt nõudma soovitud teabe edastamist.
The directive must require Member States to supply the requested information.
Artikkel 8 a
Article 8 a (new)
Mitte hiljem kui [5 aastat pärast direktiivi jõustumiskuupäeva] peab Euroopa Komisjon parlamendile ja nõukogule esitama hindamisaruande vastavalt artiklile 6 saadud informatsiooni põhjal.
No later than [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Directive] the Commission must submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation report drawn up on the basis of the information obtained pursuant to Article 6.
Selles aruandes analüüsib komisjon liikmesriigi vastavust direktiivile ja vajaduse korral teeb ettepaneku lisameetmeteks.
In this report the Commission will analyse the Member States' compliance with this Directive and, where necessary, make proposals for additional measures.
Hindamisaruande esitamisega pärast 5 aastat võimaldab komisjon Euroopa Parlamendil ja nõukogul hinnata, kas liikmesriigid on oma eesmärgid saavutanud ja kas oleks vaja rakendada lisameetmeid.
By submitting an evaluation report after 5 years, the Commission will enable the European Parliament and the Council to judge whether the Member States have met their obligations and whether there is a need for additional measures.
Recognition of seafarers' certificates
Recognition of seafarers' certificates
Training and certification requirements for seafarers are prescribed by the IMO Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW Convention), which also contains agreements about the recognition of certificates.
Training and certification requirements for seafarers are prescribed by the IMO Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW Convention), which also contains agreements about the recognition of certificates.
These international requirements were transposed into Community legislation by way of Directive 2001/25/EC.
These international requirements were transposed into Community legislation by way of Directive 2001/25/EC.
However, this directive refers, for the recognition of certificates, to two other European directives which provide for a separate recognition procedure.
However, this directive refers, for the recognition of certificates, to two other European directives which provide for a separate recognition procedure.
This reference is superfluous and undesirable, principally because minimum requirements for professionals in the maritime transport sector have been laid down at European level for some time.
This reference is superfluous and undesirable, principally because minimum requirements for professionals in the maritime transport sector have been laid down at European level for some time.
In other words, all Member States already have to comply with the same rules for certification, and do not therefore need a complicated procedure to check this with each other.
In other words, all Member States already have to comply with the same rules for certification, and do not therefore need a complicated procedure to check this with each other.
In addition, the recognition of certificates issued by third countries has now also been simplified.
In addition, the recognition of certificates issued by third countries has now also been simplified.
This leads to the paradoxical situation that the recognition of certificates from outside the EU is now simpler than that of certificates from within the EU.
This leads to the paradoxical situation that the recognition of certificates from outside the EU is now simpler than that of certificates from within the EU.
This is discriminatory and unnecessarily hinders the free movement of seafarers.
This is discriminatory and unnecessarily hinders the free movement of seafarers.
The decline in the number of EU seafarers makes it all the more necessary that there should be free movement of workers in this sector.
The decline in the number of EU seafarers makes it all the more necessary that there should be free movement of workers in this sector.
Accordingly, this Commission proposal seeks first of all to simplify the recognition procedure.
Accordingly, this Commission proposal seeks first of all to simplify the recognition procedure.
It also regulates a number of specific issues:
It also regulates a number of specific issues:
Language proficiency
Language proficiency
Directive 2001/25/EC only partially transposed the STCW rules on communication into EU law.
Directive 2001/25/EC only partially transposed the STCW rules on communication into EU law.
In the interest of safety at sea, improving social conditions on board, and the mobility of workers, the Commission now proposes that the relevant provisions of the STCW Convention – namely a satisfactory command of English – be transposed into EU law.
In the interest of safety at sea, improving social conditions on board, and the mobility of workers, the Commission now proposes that the relevant provisions of the STCW Convention – namely a satisfactory command of English – be transposed into EU law.
Prevention of fraud
Prevention of fraud
A recent IMO study has shown that fraud involving seafarers’ certificates is a regular occurrence.
A recent IMO study has shown that fraud involving seafarers’ certificates is a regular occurrence.
The directive requires the Member States to take appropriate measures to prevent this.
The directive requires the Member States to take appropriate measures to prevent this.
The Commission, supported by the Maritime Safety Agency, periodically checks whether the Member States are complying with these requirements.
The Commission, supported by the Maritime Safety Agency, periodically checks whether the Member States are complying with these requirements.
Rapporteur’s view
Rapporteur’s view
Your rapporteur welcomes this Commission proposal as a necessary corrective to the existing European directive 2001/25/EC.
Your rapporteur welcomes this Commission proposal as a necessary corrective to the existing European directive 2001/25/EC.
The proposal would restrict administrative burdens, combat discrimination and promote the mobility of workers in the maritime sector.
The proposal would restrict administrative burdens, combat discrimination and promote the mobility of workers in the maritime sector.
European rules should as far as possible be in line with international agreements, in this case the STCW Convention.
European rules should as far as possible be in line with international agreements, in this case the STCW Convention.
This is in the interest of transparency, legal certainty and reducing the burden of regulation.
This is in the interest of transparency, legal certainty and reducing the burden of regulation.
In your rapporteur’s view, the Commission proposal meets this requirement.
In your rapporteur’s view, the Commission proposal meets this requirement.
However, your rapporteur wishes to make a small number of amendments to tighten up parts of the directive.
However, your rapporteur wishes to make a small number of amendments to tighten up parts of the directive.
While considering an earlier amendment to Directive 2001/25/EC in 2003, the European Parliament expressed its concern about fraud involving seafarers’ certificates.
While considering an earlier amendment to Directive 2001/25/EC in 2003, the European Parliament expressed its concern about fraud involving seafarers’ certificates.
Your rapporteur notes with approval that the Commission now proposes concrete measures to prevent such fraud.
Your rapporteur notes with approval that the Commission now proposes concrete measures to prevent such fraud.
Your rapporteur wishes to stress, however, by an amendment to Recital 9, that Member States should also keep up their efforts in the context of the IMO towards the world-wide combating of fraud, since vessels and crews from third countries not covered by this directive - which also enter European waters and ports - may constitute a safety risk.
Your rapporteur wishes to stress, however, by an amendment to Recital 9, that Member States should also keep up their efforts in the context of the IMO towards the world-wide combating of fraud, since vessels and crews from third countries not covered by this directive - which also enter European waters and ports - may constitute a safety risk.
Confirmation of authenticity
Confirmation of authenticity
The Commission proposes that in the event of ‘justified doubts’, the host country may ask the competent authorities of another Member State to provide confirmation of the authenticity of seafarers’ certificates.
The Commission proposes that in the event of ‘justified doubts’, the host country may ask the competent authorities of another Member State to provide confirmation of the authenticity of seafarers’ certificates.
However, the proposal does not impose a requirement on the other Member States to provide such confirmation.
However, the proposal does not impose a requirement on the other Member States to provide such confirmation.
Your rapporteur wishes to tighten this provision by requiring Member States to supply a written confirmation to the host country if it requests one.
Your rapporteur wishes to tighten this provision by requiring Member States to supply a written confirmation to the host country if it requests one.
Evaluation report
Evaluation report
Following a number of shipwrecks off the European coast, the European Parliament has repeatedly asserted that safety at sea needs to be improved first and foremost not by imposing yet more new rules, but by improving the implementation and enforcement of those which already exist.
Following a number of shipwrecks off the European coast, the European Parliament has repeatedly asserted that safety at sea needs to be improved first and foremost not by imposing yet more new rules, but by improving the implementation and enforcement of those which already exist.
The Commission should ensure that the Member States comply with their obligations.
The Commission should ensure that the Member States comply with their obligations.
By submitting an evaluation report after 5 years, the Commission will enable the European Parliament and the Council to judge whether the Member States have met their obligations and whether there is a need for additional measures.
By submitting an evaluation report after 5 years, the Commission will enable the European Parliament and the Council to judge whether the Member States have met their obligations and whether there is a need for additional measures.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek liikmesriikide poolt väljastatud meremeeste kutsetunnistuste tunnustamise kohta, millega muudetakse direktiivi 2001/25/EÜ
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of seafarers’ certificates issued by the Member States and amending Directive 2001/25/EC
EÜ art 251 lg 2 ja art 80 lg 2
Articles 251(2) and 80(2) EC
Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Etelka Barsi Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Sa?d El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zile
Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Etelka Barsi Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Teema: Nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek, millega muudetakse direktiivi 77/388/EÜ seoses Tšehhi Vabariigi, Eesti, Küprose, Läti, Leedu, Ungari, Malta, Poola, Sloveenia ja Slovakkia ühinemisega
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EC by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
Raportöör: Ian Stewart Hudghton
Rapporteur: Ian Stewart Hudghton
nõukogu direktiivi ettepaneku kohta, millega muudetakse direktiivi 77/388/EÜ seoses Tšehhi Vabariigi, Eesti, Küprose, Läti, Leedu, Ungari, Malta, Poola, Sloveenia ja Slovakkia ühinemisega
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EC by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule (8754/2004 - KOM(2004)0295 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (8754/2004 - COM(2004)0295 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artiklit 93, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga ( C6–0074/2004 );
– having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0074/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse majandus- ja rahanduskomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0058/2004 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0058/2004 ),
A. kinnitab uuesti parlamendi 20. novembri 2002
A. reaffirming its support for the experimental scheme of reduced rates of value added tax for labour-intensive services, as expressed in its positions of 20 November 2002
ELT C 25 E, 29.1.2004, lk 177. , 4. detsembri 2003
OJ C 25 E, 29.1.2004, p.
Selle eesmärk on uurida alandatud maksumäära – loodetavasti positiivset – mõju töökohtade säilitamisele ja loomisele teenindussektori teatud töömahukates valdkondades.
Its objective is to study the - hopefully beneficial - effect of reduced taxation on job preservation and creation in specific, labour-intensive sectors of the service industry.
Siinkohal tuleks meenutada, et antud eksperiment pidi algselt lõpetatama 31. detsembril 2002, kuid siis pikendati selle kehtivusaega kuni 31. detsembrini 2003.
It should be recalled that this experiment was originally due to expire by 31 December 2002, and was then extended until 31 December 2003.
Seega oleks rakendamise aeg igal juhul lõppenud enne 1. mail 2004 toimunud laienemist .
As such, it would close in any case before enlargement became effective on 1 May 2004.
Seetõttu ei käsitletud antud küsimust ühinemisläbirääkimiste raames ja asjakohane direktiivi 77/388/EÜ (ajutine) muutmine ei kajastu vastavates ühinemisaktides.
It was therefore not included in the accession negotiations, and the relevant - temporary - modification to Directive 77/388(CE) is not covered by the respective Acts of Accession.