natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Alates käesoleva artikli esimeses lõikes viidatud käesoleva määruse jõustumise kuupäevast kuni artikli 12 lõikes 2 viidatud nimekirjade vastuvõtmiseni võib esitada artikli 12 lõikes 1 viidatud tervisealaseid väiteid ettevõtjate vastutusel tingimusel, et need vastavad käesolevale määrusele ja nende suhtes kehtivatele sätetele ega piira artiklis 22 viidatud kaitsemeetmete vastuvõtmist.
From the date of entry into force of this Regulation as referred to in paragraph 1 until the adoption of the lists referred to in Article 12(2), health claims as referred to in Article 12(1) may be made under the responsibility of business operators provided that they are in accordance with this Regulation and with existing national provisions applicable to them, and without prejudice to the adoption of safeguard measures as referred to in Article 22.
The regulation should allow companies to continue to market their products currently on the market until the EFSA and the Standing Committee have taken a final decision.
The regulation should allow companies to continue to market their products currently on the market until the EFSA and the Standing Committee have taken a final decision.
Artikli 26 lõige 3 b (uus)
Article 26, paragraph 3 b (new)
Tervisealaseid väiteid, v.a artikli 12 lõikes 1 viidatud teavet, mis on esitatud toiduainete, toiduainete kategooriate või toitainete kohta käesoleva määruse jõustumise ajal, võib jätkuvalt esitada tingimusel, et taotlus loa saamiseks vastavalt artiklile 14 esitatakse 12 kuu jooksul alates käesoleva määruse rakendamise esimesest päevast ja enne kuue kuu möödumist pärast lõpliku otsuse vastuvõtmist vastavalt artiklile 16.
Health claims other than those referred to in Article 12(1) made in accordance with existing provisions in respect of foods, categories of foods, or nutrients at the time of entry into force of this Regulation may continue to be made, provided that an application for authorisation in accordance with Article 14 is submitted within 12 months of the first day of application of this Regulation, during a period not exceeding six months after a final decision has been taken in accordance with Article 16.
The regulation should allow companies to continue to market their products currently on the market until the EFSA and the Standing Committee have taken a final decision, provided that a company to which this case applies has submitted an application to enable its claim to be authorised under the authorisation procedure.
The regulation should allow companies to continue to market their products currently on the market until the EFSA and the Standing Committee have taken a final decision, provided that a company to which this case applies has submitted an application to enable its claim to be authorised under the authorisation procedure.
The above transitional provision would be to the advantage of all the parties concerned, including the authorities responsible for the authorisation procedure.
The above transitional provision would be to the advantage of all the parties concerned, including the authorities responsible for the authorisation procedure.
Lisa, punkt 7 a (uus) pärast punkti “Küllastunud rasvavaba”
Annex, point 7 a (new) after point 'Saturated Fat-Free'
PUHTAD SÜSIVESIKUD
NET CARBOHYDRATES
See mõiste tähistab netoarvu, mis on saadud kõikidest süsivesikutest nende süsivesikute lahutamisega, millel on väga väike mõju veresuhkrule; süsivesikute netokogus = süsivesikute üldkogus – glütseriin – orgaanilised happed.
This term would be a net number which subtracts from total carbohydrates those carbohydrates which have a very low impact on blood sugar; net carb = total carbohydrates - glycerine - organic acids.
Suhkrualkohole maha ei arvata, kuna need võivad mõjutada veresuhkrut olenevalt toitude töötlemisest ja koostisest.
Sugar alcohols would not be subtracted because they may affect blood sugar depending on the processing and formulation of the foods.
It has been proven that net-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
It has been proven that net-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
Claims relating to net carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about net carbohydrate content in foods.
Claims relating to net carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about net carbohydrate content in foods.
Lisa, punkt 7 b (uus) pärast punkti “Küllastunud rasvavaba”
Annex, point 7 b (new) after point 'Saturated Fat-Free'
MADALA SÜSIVESIKUSISALDUSEGA
LOW IN CARBOHYDRATES
Väidet, et toode on madala süsivesikusisaldusega, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode ei sisalda üle 5 g puhtaid süsivesikuid toote portsjoni kohta, võttes arvesse asjaolu, et puhtad süsivesikud on netoarv, mis on saadud kõikidest süsivesikutest nende süsivesikute lahutamisega, millel on väga väike mõju veresuhkrule; süsivesikute netokogus = süsivesikute üldkogus – glütseriin – orgaanilised happed.
A claim that a product is low in carbohydrates, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains no more than 5g net carbohydrates per serving of product, taking account of the fact that net carbohydrates are a net number which subtracts those carbohydrates which have a very low impact on blood sugar; net carb = total carbohydrates - glycerine - organic acids.
It has been proven that low-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
It has been proven that low-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
Claims relating to low carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about low carbohydrate content in foods.
Claims relating to low carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about low carbohydrate content in foods.
Lisa, punkt 7 c (uus) pärast punkti “Küllastunud rasvavaba”
Annex, point 7 c (new) after point 'Saturated Fat-Free'
VÄHENDATUD SÜSIVESIKUSISALDUSEGA
REDUCED CARBOHYDRATES
Väidet, et toode on vähendatud süsivesikusisaldusega, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode ei sisalda üle 10 g puhtaid süsivesikuid toote portsjoni kohta, võttes arvesse asjaolu, et puhtad süsivesikud on netoarv, mis on saadud kõikidest süsivesikutest nende süsivesikute lahutamisega, millel on väga väike mõju veresuhkrule; süsivesikute netokogus = süsivesikute üldkogus – glütseriin – orgaanilised happed.
A claim that a product is reduced in carbohydrates, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains no more than 10g net carbohydrates per serving of product, taking account of the fact that net carbohydrates are a net number which subtracts those carbohydrates which have a very low impact on blood sugar; net carb = total carbohydrates - glycerine - organic acids.
It has been proven that reduced-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
It has been proven that reduced-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
Claims relating to reduced carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about reduced carbohydrate content in foods.
Claims relating to reduced carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about reduced carbohydrate content in foods.
Lisa, punkt 18
Annex, point 18
VITAMIINIDE JA/VÕI MINERAALIDE LOODUSLIK ALLIKAS
NATURAL SOURCE OF VITAMINS AND/OR MINERALS
VITAMIINIDE JA/VÕI MINERAALIDE ALLIKAS
SOURCE OF VITAMINS AND/OR MINERALS
Väidet, et toiduaine on vitamiinide ja/või mineraalide looduslik allikas, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode sisaldab vähemalt 15% soovitatavast päevasest annusest , mis on määratletud nõukogu direktiivi 90/496/EMÜ lisas, 100 g või 100 ml kohta.
A claim that a food is a natural source of vitamins and/or minerals, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 15% of the recommended daily allowance specified in the Annex of Council Directive 90/496/EEC per 100 g or 100 ml.
Väidet, et toiduaine on vitamiinide ja/või mineraalide allikas, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode sisaldab vähemalt 15% soovitatavast toiteväärtusest (STV) 100 g kohta (tahke aine) ja 7,5% STV 100 ml kohta (vedelik) või 5% STV 100 kcal kohta (12% STV 1 MJ kohta) või 15% STV portsjoni kohta .
A claim that a food is a source of vitamins and/or minerals, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 15% of the recommended nutritional values (RNV) per 100g (solids) and 7.5% of the RNV per 100 ml (liquids), or 5% of the RNV per 100 kcal (12 % of the VNR per 1 MJ) or 15% of the RNV per portion .
Kui toiduained on vitamiinide ja/või mineraalide looduslikud allikad, siis võivad väitele eelneda sõnad “looduslikult” või “looduslik”.
If foods are natural sources of vitamins and/or minerals, the claim may be preceded by the words "naturally" or "natural".
The conditions to which the use of the claim "source of" vitamins or minerals is subject should be modelled on the conditions laid down in the Codex Alimentarius, i.e apply different thresholds establishing a distinction between solid and liquid products.
The conditions to which the use of the claim "source of" vitamins or minerals is subject should be modelled on the conditions laid down in the Codex Alimentarius, i.e. apply different thresholds establishing a distinction between solid and liquid products.
Moreover, the reference thresholds proposed by the Commission are likely to be seriously prejudicial to dairy products, despite their well-known and important contribution to calcium intake.
Moreover, the reference thresholds proposed by the Commission are likely to be seriously prejudicial to dairy products, despite their well-known and important contribution to calcium intake.
Lisa, punkt 24 a (uus)
Annex, point 24 a (new)
TÄRKLISE ALLIKAS
SOURCE OF STARCH
Väidet, et toode on tärklise allikas, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode sisaldab vähemalt 15 g tärklist 100 g kohta.
A claim that a food is a source of starch, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 15g of starch per 100g.
As some consumers require products containing starch for health reasons, it should be possible for them to be labelled as such.
As some consumers require products containing starch for health reasons, it should be possible for them to be labelled as such.
The values comply with the provisions of the Codex Alimentarius.
The values comply with the provisions of the Codex Alimentarius.
Lisa, punkt 24 b (uus)
Annex, point 24 b (new)
LIITSÜSIVESIKUTE ALLIKAS
SOURCE OF COMPLEX CARBOHYDRATES
Väidet, et toode on liitsüsivesikute allikas, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode sisaldab vähemalt 25 g liitsüsivesikuid 100 g kohta.
A claim that a food is a source of complex carbohydrates, and any other claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may be made only where the food contains at least 25 g of complex carbohydrates per 100 g.
Complex carbohydrates are made up of long chains of simple sugars.
Complex carbohydrates are made up of long chains of simple sugars.
They are found in their natural state in cereals, fruit, pulses (peas and beans), and other green vegetables.
They are found in their natural state in cereals, fruit, pulses (peas and beans), and other green vegetables.
They include every type of digestible carbohydrates except mono- and disaccharides.
They include every type of digestible carbohydrates except mono- and disaccharides.
The energy in a food is supplied essentially by the following nutrients: proteins, carbohydrates, and fats.
The energy in a food is supplied essentially by the following nutrients: proteins, carbohydrates, and fats.
According to the dietary recommendations of various European countries, the intake of the above three nutrients should be as follows:
According to the dietary recommendations of various European countries, the intake of the above three nutrients should be as follows:
- not more than 30-35% of energy should come from fats;
- not more than 30-35% of energy should come from fats;
- between 10 and 15% of energy should come from proteins;
- between 10 and 15% of energy should come from proteins;
- not less than 50% of energy should come from carbohydrates (preferably in the form of complex carbohydrates).
- not less than 50% of energy should come from carbohydrates (preferably in the form of complex carbohydrates).
It is therefore important to inform consumers about foods that are a source of, or high in, carbohydrates so as to make them opt for healthier kinds of diets.
It is therefore important to inform consumers about foods that are a source of, or high in, carbohydrates so as to make them opt for healthier kinds of diets.
Lisa, punkt 24 c (uus)
Annex, point 24 c (new)
Väidet, et toode on kõrge tärklisesisaldusega, ja tarbija jaoks tõenäoliselt samatähenduslikku väidet võib esitada ainult siis, kui toode sisaldab vähemalt 30 g tärklist 100 g kohta.
A claim that a food is high in starch, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 30g of starch per 100g.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse ettepanek toidu kohta esitatavate toitumis- ja tervisealaste väidete kohta
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods
Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Dorette Corbey, Avril Doyle, Jan Christian Ehler, Satu Hassi, Wolf Klinz, Peter Liese, Toine Manders, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Vittorio Prodi, John Purvis, Peter Skinner
Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Dorette Corbey, Avril Doyle, Jan Christian Ehler, Satu Hassi, Wolf Klinz, Peter Liese, Toine Manders, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Vittorio Prodi, John Purvis, Peter Skinner
SISETURU– JA TARBIJAKAITSEKOMISJONI arvamus
OPINION of the COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
(*) Komisjonidevaheline tõhustatud koostöö – kodukorra artikkel 47
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
The draftsperson welcomes and supports the Commission's proposal which responds to the Parliament's resolutions of March 1998 on the Green Paper on the General Principles of Food Law in the EU and of June 2001 on the White Paper on Food Safety.
The draftsperson welcomes and supports the Commission's proposal which responds to the Parliament's resolutions of March 1998 on the Green Paper on the General Principles of Food Law in the EU and of June 2001 on the White Paper on Food Safety.
The draftsperson particularly supports the introduction of general principles and conditions for the use of claims welcomes the establishment of the list of nutrition claims, conditions for comparative claims, distinction between health claims relating to bodily functions and the ones referring to reduction of disease risk or the definition of a consumer based on the ECJ rulings.
The draftsperson particularly supports the introduction of general principles and conditions for the use of claims welcomes the establishment of the list of nutrition claims, conditions for comparative claims, distinction between health claims relating to bodily functions and the ones referring to reduction of disease risk or the definition of a consumer based on the ECJ rulings.
However, there are various aspects of the proposal which require improvement.
However, there are various aspects of the proposal which require improvement.
Nutritional Profiling
Nutritional Profiling
The Commission’s proposal seek to limit nutrition and health claims to foods that are "good for you".
The Commission’s proposal seeks to limit nutrition and health claims to foods that are "good for you".
The draftsman does not believe that it should be the role of government – whether local, national or European – to take decisions as to which foods are good for consumers.
The draftsman does not believe that it should be the role of government – whether local, national or European – to take decisions as to which foods are good for consumers.
The Commission’s proposal raise a number of questions which must be answered before the principle of nutritional profiles can be considered:
The Commission’s proposal raise a number of questions which must be answered before the principle of nutritional profiles can be considered:
If different people have different dietary needs - depending on factors such as lifestyle, age, gender - can we really talk about good foods and bad foods, rather than good diets and bad diets?
If different people have different dietary needs - depending on factors such as lifestyle, age, gender - can we really talk about good foods and bad foods, rather than good diets and bad diets?
Do consumers have a right to this nutritional information regardless of any nutritional profile?
Do consumers have a right to this nutritional information regardless of any nutritional profile?
Why should it be acceptable for a low-fat cheese to claim to be high in calcium but not for a high-fat cheese that may contain as much or more calcium?
Why should it be acceptable for a low-fat cheese to claim to be high in calcium but not for a high-fat cheese that may contain as much or more calcium?
Whilst we don't want to see alcopops marketed as being good for you, is there any sense in preventing red wine producers from claiming that moderate quantities of red wine can be good for your heart?
Whilst we don't want to see alcopops marketed as being good for you, is there any sense in preventing red wine producers from claiming that moderate quantities of red wine can be good for your heart?
General health claims
General health claims
The draftsman believes that a ban on all general and implied health claims would be a disproportionate measure.
The draftsman believes that a ban on all general and implied health claims would be a disproportionate measure.
Where claims are supported by scientific knowledge and do not mislead consumers, the subject and scope of the claim should not be a matter for legislation.
Where claims are supported by scientific knowledge and do not mislead consumers, the subject and scope of the claim should not be a matter for legislation.
Existing legislation on misleading advertising and on food labelling already prohibits the use of untrue of misleading claims.
Existing legislation on misleading advertising and on food labelling already prohibits the use of untrue of misleading claims.
The draftsman believes that it would be preferable to enforce such existing legislation more consistently and more effectively rather than introduce more legislation unlikely to be enforced any better.
The draftsman believes that it would be preferable to enforce such existing legislation more consistently and more effectively rather than introduce more legislation unlikely to be enforced any better.
General claims are a common advertising tool.
General claims are a common advertising tool.
Most successful advertising campaigns claim that their product will – at some level – make you happier, healthier, richer or more attractive to the opposite sex.
Most successful advertising campaigns claim that their product will – at some level – make you happier, healthier, richer or more attractive to the opposite sex.
In many cases they are not intended to be taken literally and are not taken as being a genuine claim but just an advertising “puff”.
In many cases they are not intended to be taken literally and are not taken as being a genuine claim but just an advertising “puff”.
Whether the “claim” is made verbally or through the use of pictures or sounds.
Whether the “claim” is made verbally or through the use of pictures or sounds.
It would clearly be ludicrous to tell sweet manufacturers that they shouldn’t display pictures of happy children either in their adverts or on their packaging, or to stop a breakfast cereal from suggesting that their cereal sends children to school ready for the day ahead.
It would clearly be ludicrous to tell sweet manufacturers that they shouldn’t display pictures of happy children either in their adverts or on their packaging, or to stop a breakfast cereal from suggesting that their cereal sends children to school ready for the day ahead.
If this is allowed in advertising, why shouldn’t it be allowed on the packaging or on the in-store display?
If this is allowed in advertising, why shouldn’t it be allowed on the packaging or on the in-store display?
The Commission’s proposal threaten to create a state of legal uncertainty around the food advertising industry.
The Commission’s proposal threaten to create a state of legal uncertainty around the food advertising industry.
The draftsman is concerned that the Commission does not appear to have fully considered the position of companies whose brand names contain health claims that would be restricted under the proposed Regulation.
The draftsman is concerned that the Commission does not appear to have fully considered the position of companies whose brand names contain health claims that would be restricted under the proposed Regulation.
Unless these trademarks were to be given an exemption then the brands themselves could be threatened.
Unless these trademarks were to be given an exemption then the brands themselves could be threatened.
However, if they were to be given such an exemption, it would appear to be unfair to other manufacturers who make similar claims for similar products.
However, if they were to be given such an exemption, it would appear to be unfair to other manufacturers who make similar claims for similar products.
The draftsman believe that the answer is not for a specific exemption but for those sections of the proposals that would most severely restrict the use of brand names – particularly nutritional profiling and restrictions on general and implied health claims – should be reconsidered so as to be fair to the whole of the food industry and to avoid creating further confusion amongst consumers.
The draftsman believe that the answer is not for a specific exemption but for those sections of the proposals that would most severely restrict the use of brand names – particularly nutritional profiling and restrictions on general and implied health claims – should be reconsidered so as to be fair to the whole of the food industry and to avoid creating further confusion amongst consumers.
Barriers to Trade
Barriers to Trade
The draftsman believes that any legislation should be considered within the broader context of existing WHO, Codex Alimentarius and Council of Europe guidelines, as well as take into consideration the recent Commission proposal for a Regulation concerning common rules for the addition of vitamins and minerals to foods (‘food fortification’).
The draftsman believes that any legislation should be considered within the broader context of existing WHO, Codex Alimentarius and Council of Europe guidelines, as well as take into consideration the recent Commission proposal for a Regulation concerning common rules for the addition of vitamins and minerals to foods (‘food fortification’).
Any new standards or regulations should, as far as is possible, be in line with international standards.
Any new standards or regulations should, as far as is possible, be in line with international standards.
Authorisation Procedure
Authorisation Procedure
The draftsman is concerned that the proposed authorisation procedure is too complicated and would place a heavy burden on the European Food Safety Authority.
The draftsman is concerned that the proposed authorisation procedure is too complicated and would place a heavy burden on the European Food Safety Authority.