natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
g) tagavad kõigi ühenduse ühiskasutuskava jaoks eraldatud kontrolli- ja inspekteerimisvahendite kasutamise vastavalt ühise kalanduspoliitika eeskirjadele.
(g) ensure that any means of control and inspection, assigned to a Community joint deployment plan carry out their activities in accordance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Ei puuduta eestikeelset versiooni.
(g) ensure that any means of control and inspection, assigned to a Community joint deployment plan , carries out its activities in accordance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy.
ARTIKKEL 14
ARTICLE 14
Agentuur viib igal aastal läbi kõigi ühiskasutuskavade tulemuslikkuse hindamise ning analüüsib olemasolevate andmete põhjal, kas valitseb oht, et kalapüügitegevus ei ole rakendatavate kaitse- ja kontrollimeetmetega kooskõlas.
The Agency shall undertake an annual assessment of the effectiveness of each joint deployment plan, as well as an analysis, on the basis of available evidence, of the existence of a risk that fishing activities are not compliant with applicable conservation and control measures.
Tulemused edastatakse koheselt komisjonile.
Such assessments shall be promptly communicated to the Commission.
Tulemused edastatakse koheselt Euroopa Parlamendile, komisjonile , liikmesriikidele ning kalanduse ja akvakultuuri nõuandekomiteele (ACFA) .
Such assessments shall be promptly communicated to the European Parliament, the Commission , the Member States and the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA) .
For reasons of transparency, the assessments cannot be sent to the Commission alone.
For reasons of transparency, the assessments cannot be sent to the Commission alone.
ARTIKLI 17 LÕIGE 1
ARTICLE 17, PARAGRAPH 1
Komisjon, agentuur ja liikmesriikide pädevad asutused edastavad üksteisele nende käsutuses olevat asjakohast teavet ühenduse piires ja rahvusvahelistel vetel teostatava kontrolli ja inspekteerimise kohta.
The Commission, the Agency and the competent authorities of Member States shall exchange relevant information available to them regarding control and inspection activities within Community and international waters.
Komisjon, agentuur, liikmesriikide pädevad asutused ja nende kolmandate riikide pädevad asutused, kellega ühendus on sõlminud kalanduskokkuleppe, mille hulka kuulub ka kokkulepe jõustamise kohta, edastavad üksteisele nende käsutuses olevat asjakohast teavet ühenduse piires ja rahvusvahelistel vetel teostatava kontrolli ja inspekteerimise kohta.
The Commission, the Agency and the competent authorities of Member States and those third countries with which the Community has negotiated a fisheries agreement that includes an enforcement agreement shall exchange relevant information available to them regarding control and inspection activities within Community and international waters.
ARTIKLI 19 LÕIGE 4
ARTICLE 19, PARAGRAPH 4
Agentuur asub Hispaanias [……….] .
The seat of the Agency shall be at [……….] , Spain.
Agentuur asub Vigos, Hispaanias.
The seat of the Agency shall be at Vigo , Spain.
The Agency must be based in Vigo, Galicia, in view of the port’s highly important status in world fishing, in terms of the sheer volume of catches and of international shipping.
The Agency must be based in Vigo, Galicia, in view of the port’s highly important status in world fishing, in terms of the sheer volume of catches and of international shipping.
Galicia has also been devastated by several accidents at sea, particularly the Prestige disaster in 2002.
Galicia has also been devastated by several accidents at sea, particularly the Prestige disaster in 2002.
By way of compensation, steps must be made which provide for Community involvement in both the fishing industry as a whole and the least-developed regions, of which Galicia is one.
By way of compensation, steps must be made which provide for Community involvement in both the fishing industry as a whole and the least-developed regions, of which Galicia is one.
ARTIKKEL 19, LÕIGE 4 a (uus)
ARTICLE 19, PARAGRAPH 4a (new)
Co-financing of the Agencies should be encouraged in order for the users to contribute to the source offered by the Community.
Co-financing of the Agencies should be encouraged in order for the users to contribute to the source offered by the Community.
In addition, the Joint Declaration adopted in the context of the revision of the Agencies’ basis acts following the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation stipulates that Member States are encouraged to contribute to the settlement of the Agencies.
In addition, the Joint Declaration adopted in the context of the revision of the Agencies’ basis acts following the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation stipulates that Member States are encouraged to contribute to the settlement of the Agencies.
ARTIKLI 24 LÕIKE 2 PUNKT c
ARTICLE 24, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (c)
c) võtab komisjoni ja liikmesriikide arvamust arvestades iga aasta 31. oktoobriks vastu agentuuri järgmise aasta tööprogrammi ning edastab selle Euroopa Parlamendile, nõukogule, komisjonile ja liikmesriikidele;
(c) adopt by 31 October each year, and taking into account the opinion of the Commission and the Member States, the work programme of the Agency for the coming year and forward it to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Member States;
c) võtab komisjoni ja liikmesriikide arvamust arvestades iga aasta 31. oktoobriks vastu agentuuri järgmise aasta tööprogrammi ning edastab selle Euroopa Parlamendile, nõukogule, komisjonile , liikmesriikidele ja ACFAle ;
(c) adopt by 31 October each year, and taking into account the opinion of the Commission and the Member States, the work programme of the Agency for the coming year and forward it to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission , the Member States and the ACFA ;
For reasons of transparency, the work programme cannot be sent to the Commission alone.
For reasons of transparency, the work programme cannot be sent to the Commission alone.
ARTIKLI 25 LÕIKE 1 ALALÕIK 1
ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1, SUBPARAGRAPH 1
Haldusnõukogusse kuulub üks esindaja igast liikmesriigist, kelle laevad on seotud mere-elusressurssidega seonduva kalapüügitegevusega, neli komisjoni esindajat ja neli komisjoni poolt määratud hääleõiguseta kalandussektori esindajat.
The Administrative Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State whose vessels are engaged in fishing activities relating to marine living resources and four representatives of the Commission as well as of four representatives of the fishing industry nominated by the Commission without the right to vote .
Haldusnõukogusse kuulub üks esindaja igast liikmesriigist, kelle laevad on seotud mere-elusressurssidega seonduva kalapüügitegevusega, neli komisjoni esindajat ja neli ACFA poolt määratud kalandussektori esindajat.
The Administrative Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State whose vessels are engaged in fishing activities relating to marine living resources and four representatives of the Commission as well as of four representatives of the fishing industry nominated by the ACFA .
Unless the Commission does not trust the fishing industry, there is no justifiable reason for it to nominate the industry’s representatives.
Unless the Commission does not trust the fishing industry, there is no justifiable reason for it to nominate the industry’s representatives.
A representative body within the industry itself should be responsible for choosing who will represent it.
A representative body within the industry itself should be responsible for choosing who will represent it.
In addition, in view of the fact that it has so few representatives on the Administrative Board, it is hard to see why the fishing industry should not be entitled to vote.
In addition, in view of the fact that it has so few representatives on the Administrative Board, it is hard to see why the fishing industry should not be entitled to vote.
ARTIKLI 25 LÕIGE 2
ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2
Kõik liikmesriigid ja komisjon määravad haldusnõukogusse oma esindajad, samuti määravad asendajad, kes asendavad haldusnõukogu liiget tema äraolekul.
Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint their members of the Administrative Board as well as an alternate who will represent the member in his/her absence.
Kõik liikmesriigid , komisjon ja ACFA määravad haldusnõukogusse oma esindajad, samuti määravad asendajad, kes asendavad haldusnõukogu liiget tema äraolekul.
Each Member State , the Commission and the ACFA shall appoint their members of the Administrative Board as well as an alternate who will represent the member in his/her absence.
See amendment 23.
See amendment 23.
ARTIKLI 27 LÕIGE 3
ARTICLE 27, PARAGRAPH 3
Haldusnõukogu korralised koosolekud toimuvad kord aastas.
The Administrative Board shall hold an ordinary meeting once a year.
Lisaks tuleb nõukogu kokku eesistuja kutsel, komisjoni või ühe kolmandiku haldusnõukogus esindatud liikmesriikide nõudmisel.
In addition it shall meet on the initiative of the Chairperson or at the request of the Commission or of one-third of the Member States represented on the Administrative Board.
Lisaks tuleb nõukogu kokku eesistuja kutsel, komisjoni , ühe kolmandiku haldusnõukogus esindatud liikmesriikide või tööstuse esindajate enamuse nõudmisel.
In addition it shall meet on the initiative of the Chairperson or at the request of the Commission , of one-third of the Member States represented on the Administrative Board or of a majority of those representing the industry .
The fishing industry may also wish to convene a meeting of the Administrative Board.
The fishing industry may also wish to convene a meeting of the Administrative Board.
ARTIKLI 27 LÕIGE 4
ARTICLE 27, PARAGRAPH 4
Konfidentsiaalse küsimuse või huvide konflikti korral võib haldusnõukogu võtta vastu otsuse arutada konkreetseid päevakorraküsimusi ilma komisjoni poolt kalandussektori esindajatena nõukogusse määratud liikmete juuresolekuta.
When there is a matter of confidentiality or conflict of interest, the Administrative Board may decide to examine specific items of its agenda without the presence of the members nominated by the Commission as representatives of the fishing industry.
Töökorraga võidakse kehtestada antud sätte rakendamiseks täpsemad eeskirjad.
Detailed rules for the application of this provision may be laid down in the rules of procedure.
ARTIKLI 28 LÕIKE 2 ALALÕIK 1
ARTICLE 28, PARAGRAPH 2, SUBPARAGRAPH 1
Kõigil liikmesriikide poolt määratud nõukogu liikmetel on üks hääl.
Each member who is appointed by a Member State shall have one vote .
Komisjoni poolt määratud liikmetel on kokku kümme häält.
The members appointed by the Commission shall jointly have ten votes.
Agentuuri tegevdirektor ei osale hääletamisel.
The Executive Director of the Agency shall not vote.
Kõigil liikmetel on üks hääl , välja arvatud komisjoni esindavad liikmed, kellel on kokku kümme häält.
Each member shall have one vote , except the members representing the Commission , who shall jointly have ten votes.
Brings the text into line with previous amendments with regard to who should nominate the representatives of the fishing industry.
Brings the text into line with previous amendments with regard to who should nominate the representatives of the fishing industry.
ARTIKLI 29 LÕIGE 1
ARTICLE 29, PARAGRAPH 1
Komisjoni poolt kalandussektori esindajatena nõukogusse määratud liikmed esitavad kohustuste deklaratsiooni ja huvide deklaratsiooni, näidates, et neil puuduvad huvid, mis võivad nende sõltumatust ohustada või siis tuues välja kõik otsesed või kaudsed huvid, mida võidakse pidada nende sõltumatust ohustavateks.
The members of the Administrative Board who are nominated by the Commission as representatives of the fishing industry shall make a declaration of commitment and a declaration of interests indicating either the absence of any interests which might be prejudicial to their independence or any direct or indirect interests which might be considered prejudicial to their independence.
Nimetatud deklaratsioonid esitatakse kirjalikult kord aastas.
Those declarations shall be made annually in writing.
Nõukogu liikmed esitavad kohustuste deklaratsiooni ja huvide deklaratsiooni, näidates, et neil puuduvad huvid, mis võivad nende sõltumatust ohustada või siis tuues välja kõik otsesed või kaudsed huvid, mida võidakse pidada nende sõltumatust ohustavateks.
The members of the Administrative Board shall make a declaration of commitment and a declaration of interests indicating either the absence of any interests which might be prejudicial to their independence or any direct or indirect interests which might be considered prejudicial to their independence.
ARTIKLI 29 LÕIGE 2
ARTICLE 29, PARAGRAPH 2
Komisjoni poolt kalandussektori esindajateks määratud nõukogu liikmed deklareerivad igal koosolekul kõik oma huvid, mida võidakse mõne päevakorrapunktiga seoses lugeda ohuks nende sõltumatusele.
The members of the Administrative Board who are nominated by the Commission as representatives of the fishing industry shall declare at each meeting any interests which might be considered prejudicial to their independence in relation to the items on the agenda.
Nõukogu liikmed deklareerivad igal koosolekul kõik oma huvid, mida võidakse mõne päevakorrapunktiga seoses lugeda ohuks nende sõltumatusele, ja neil ei ole õigust selliste päevakorraküsimuste üle hääletada .
The members of the Administrative Board shall declare at each meeting any interests which might be considered prejudicial to their independence in relation to the items on the agenda and shall not be entitled to vote on any such items .
ARTIKLI 30 LÕIKE 3 PUNKT g a (uus)
ARTICLE 30, PARAGRAPH 3, POINT (ga) (new)
g a) ta annab igal aastal Euroopa Parlamendile aru agentuuri tegevuse ja toimimise kohta.
(ga) he/she shall report annually to the European Parliament on the activities and functioning of the Agency.
ARTIKLI 31 LÕIGE 1
ARTICLE 31, PARAGRAPH 1
ARTIKLI 31 LÕIGE 3
ARTICLE 31, PARAGRAPH 3
Haldusnõukogul on õigus komisjoni ettepanekul tegevdirektorit vallandada.
Power to dismiss the Executive Director shall lie with the Administrative Board on the proposal of the Commission .
Haldusnõukogul on õigus liikme ettepanekul tegevdirektorit vallandada.
Power to dismiss the Executive Director shall lie with the Administrative Board on the proposal of one of its members.
Otsus langetatakse kahe kolmandiku liikmete nõusolekul.
The decision shall be taken by a two-thirds majority of members .
It is not clear why only the Commission should have the power to propose the dismissal of the Executive Director.
It is not clear why only the Commission should have the power to propose the dismissal of the Executive Director.
Other members of the Administrative Board may also have reason to make such a proposal.
Other members of the Administrative Board may also have reason to make such a proposal.
In addition, the dismissal procedure will be more stable if the decision is taken by two-thirds of members.
In addition, the dismissal procedure will be more stable if the decision is taken by two-thirds of members.
This will also bring the dismissal procedure into line with the procedure for appointing the Executive Director.
This will also bring the dismissal procedure into line with the procedure for appointing the Executive Director.
ARTIKLI 39 LÕIGE 1
ARTICLE 39, PARAGRAPH 1
Haldusnõukogu korraldab käesoleva määruse täitmise hindamise sõltumatu väljaspoolse hindaja poolt [viie] aasta jooksul alates päevast, mil agentuur alustab oma ülesannete täitmist, ja edaspidi kord iga viie aasta tagant.
Within [five] years from the date of the Agency having taken up its responsibilities, and every five years thereafter, the Administrative Board shall commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this Regulation.
Komisjon võimaldab agentuuril kasutada mistahes teavet, mida agentuur peab hindamise jaoks vajalikuks.
The Commission shall make available to the Agency any information the Agency considers relevant to the evaluation.
Haldusnõukogu korraldab käesoleva määruse täitmise hindamise sõltumatu väljaspoolse hindaja poolt [kolme] aasta jooksul alates päevast, mil agentuur alustab oma ülesannete täitmist, ja edaspidi kord iga viie aasta tagant.
Within [three] years from the date of the Agency having taken up its responsibilities, and every five years thereafter, the Administrative Board shall commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this Regulation.
ARTIKLI 41 LÕIGE 1
ARTICLE 41, PARAGRAPH 1
Artikli 34 c lõike 1 alalõik 1 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 2847/93)
Article 34c, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 (Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93)
Vastavalt 20. detsembri 2002. aasta määruse (EÜ) nr 2371/2002 (ühisele kalanduspoliitikale vastava kalavarude kaitse ja säästva kasutamise kohta)* artikli 30 lõikega 2 kehtestatud menetlusele ja asjaosaliste liikmesriikidega kooskõlastatult määrab komisjon, millistele kahe või enama liikmesriigiga seotud kalastuspiirkondadele kehtestatakse konkreetsed kontrolli- ja inspekteerimisprogrammid ja nende programmide rakendamise tingimused.
The Commission, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy * , and in concert with the Member States concerned, shall determine which fisheries involving two or more Member States shall be subject to specific control and inspection programmes and the conditions governing such programmes.
Komisjon, keda abistab 20. detsembri 2002. aasta ühisele kalanduspoliitikale vastava kalavarude kaitse ja säästva kasutamise kohta käiva määruse (EÜ) nr 2371/2002 artikli 30 lõikega 1 moodustatud kalanduse ja akvakultuuri korralduskomitee ja kes tegutseb 28. juuni 1999. aasta otsuse 1999/468/EÜ, millega kehtestatakse komisjoni rakendusvolituste kasutamise menetlused*, artiklites 4 ja 7 sätestatud korras ja asjaosaliste liikmesriikidega kooskõlastatult määrab komisjon, millistele kahe või enama liikmesriigiga seotud kalastuspiirkondadele kehtestatakse konkreetsed kontrolli- ja inspekteerimisprogrammid ja nende programmide rakendamise tingimused.
The Commission, assisted by the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture set up by Article 30(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy, and acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 4 and 7 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission* , and in concert with the Member States concerned, shall determine which fisheries involving two or more Member States shall be subject to specific control and inspection programmes and the conditions governing such programmes.
Otsuse 1999/468/EÜ artikli 4 lõikes 3 sätestatud tähtajaks kehtestatakse 20 tööpäeva.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468 EC shall be set at 20 working days.
This amendment seeks to clarify the Commission's text.
This amendment seeks to clarify the Commission's text.
Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 states that, where reference is made to it, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468 EC shall apply.
Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 states that, where reference is made to it, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468 EC shall apply.
It furthermore states that the period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468 EC shall be set at 20 working days.
It furthermore states that the period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468 EC shall be set at 20 working days.
The establishment of a Community Fisheries Control Agency should be welcomed in principle.
The establishment of a Community Fisheries Control Agency should be welcomed in principle.
It has the potential to contribute to the creation of more uniform and more effective control and inspection procedures and, thus, to increase compliance, both directly and as a result of a change of perceptions about the levelness of the playing field under the Common Fisheries Policy.
It has the potential to contribute to the creation of more uniform and more effective control and inspection procedures and, thus, to increase compliance, both directly and as a result of a change of perceptions about the levelness of the playing field under the Common Fisheries Policy.
It also has the potential to bring about a reduction in overall expenditure on control and inspection measures.
It also has the potential to bring about a reduction in overall expenditure on control and inspection measures.
It is unfortunate, however, that the Regulation had to be drafted in advance of the results of a feasibility study, which suggests that such potential will only be fulfilled if certain organisational and operational criteria are met.
It is unfortunate, however, that the Regulation had to be drafted in advance of the results of a feasibility study, which suggests that such potential will only be fulfilled if certain organisational and operational criteria are met.
In consequence a number of adjustments to and clarifications of the text are needed.
In consequence a number of adjustments to and clarifications of the text are needed.
Much depends on the success of joint deployment plans, involving a pooling by Member States of their inspection and control resources.
Much depends on the success of joint deployment plans, involving a pooling by Member States of their inspection and control resources.
The rapporteur believes that the role of the Agency as a facilitator, particularly in the context of the formulation of such plans, needs more adequately to be spelt out, as does also the nature of the functions of the planned fisheries monitoring centre.
The rapporteur believes that the role of the Agency as a facilitator, particularly in the context of the formulation of such plans, needs more adequately to be spelt out, as does also the nature of the functions of the planned fisheries monitoring centre.
Many of the suggested amendments are to the former purpose, with the accompanying aim of ensuring equity and cost effectiveness.
Many of the suggested amendments are to the former purpose, with the accompanying aim of ensuring equity and cost effectiveness.
For example, following points raised by the feasibility study, it is felt that the main basis for the level of contribution of resources to joint deployment plans by member state should be the relative value of catch, although some flexibility is needed.
For example, following points raised by the feasibility study, it is felt that the main basis for the level of contribution of resources to joint deployment plans by member state should be the relative value of catch, although some flexibility is needed.
As also indicated by the feasibility study, various jurisdictional issues, too, have to be addressed.
As also indicated by the feasibility study, various jurisdictional issues, too, have to be addressed.
Member States are committed, under Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, within waters under their sovereignty, to allowing inspections to be carried out by inspectors from other Member States, at least where a specific monitoring programme has been adopted.
Member States are committed, under Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, within waters under their sovereignty, to allowing inspections to be carried out by inspectors from other Member States, at least where a specific monitoring programme has been adopted.
They are similarly committed to allowing evidence from these inspectors to be admitted in their own judicial and administrative proceedings.
They are similarly committed to allowing evidence from these inspectors to be admitted in their own judicial and administrative proceedings.
At the same time, this shall not apply until implementing rules have been drawn up and it is clear that a number of difficulties in formulating these will require to be overcome.
At the same time, this shall not apply until implementing rules have been drawn up and it is clear that a number of difficulties in formulating these will require to be overcome.