natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With a data volume this huge, one search using existing technology, without additional investment, would take 50 to 100 years.
With a data volume this huge, one search using existing technology, without additional investment, would take 50 to 100 years.
The rapid availability of the data required seems, therefore, to be in doubt.
The rapid availability of the data required seems, therefore, to be in doubt.
In comparison with the present proposal for 'blanket' data retention, storage for a specific purpose, a model laid down inter alia by the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime
In comparison with the present proposal for 'blanket' data retention, storage for a specific purpose, a model laid down inter alia by the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime
ETS No 185, 8 November 2001; the Convention has not yet been transposed in all the Member States. , could be a suitable and milder option.
ETS No 185, 8 November 2001; the Convention has not yet been transposed in all the Member States. , could be a suitable and milder option.
Looking at the Council's reasons for rejecting this alternative
Looking at the Council's reasons for rejecting this alternative
Council document 8958/04 ADD 1.
Council document 8958/04 ADD 1.
The explanatory note on the framework decision on data retention simply states that storage for a specified purpose 'will never aid in the investigation of a person who is not already suspected of involvement with a criminal or terrorist organisation'.
The explanatory note on the framework decision on data retention simply states that storage for a specified purpose 'will never aid in the investigation of a person who is not already suspected of involvement with a criminal or terrorist organisation'.
It 'is therefore not sufficient to meet the needs of the security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies in the fight against modern criminals including terrorists.' , the question arises as to the extent to which the proposed data retention arrangements are compatible with the principle of presumption of innocence.
It 'is therefore not sufficient to meet the needs of the security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies in the fight against modern criminals including terrorists.' , the question arises as to the extent to which the proposed data retention arrangements are compatible with the principle of presumption of innocence.
The proposal also fails to address the possible strains on those concerned.
The proposal also fails to address the possible strains on those concerned.
Aside from the infringement of the protection of personal data of individuals, there is a danger that enormous burdens would be placed on the European telecommunications industry, particularly on small and medium-sized telecom companies.
Aside from the infringement of the protection of personal data of individuals, there is a danger that enormous burdens would be placed on the European telecommunications industry, particularly on small and medium-sized telecom companies.
Costs would result primarily from:
Costs would result primarily from:
- technical changes to systems for data generation and storage,
- technical changes to systems for data generation and storage,
- changes to firms' in-house processes for secure data archiving, and
- changes to firms' in-house processes for secure data archiving, and
- the processing and analysis of security authorities' inquiries.
- the processing and analysis of security authorities' inquiries.
According to estimates by a variety of large firms in the Member States, this would require investment in traditional circuit-switched telephony amounting to around EUR 180m a year for each firm, with annual operating costs of up to EUR 50m.
According to estimates by a variety of large firms in the Member States, this would require investment in traditional circuit-switched telephony amounting to around EUR 180m a year for each firm, with annual operating costs of up to EUR 50m.
In the case of small and medium-sized businesses, their ability to operate would no doubt be in jeopardy.
In the case of small and medium-sized businesses, their ability to operate would no doubt be in jeopardy.
According to estimates, the Internet-related burden would exceed that within traditional circuit-switched telephony many times over.
According to estimates, the Internet-related burden would exceed that within traditional circuit-switched telephony many times over.
For this reason, the Article 36 Committee proposes that only the data currently accumulated should be covered
For this reason, the Article 36 Committee proposes that only the data currently accumulated should be covered
Council document 15098/04 of 23 November 2004. .
Council document 15098/04 of 23 November 2004. .
The Council's proposal contains no Europe-wide harmonised arrangements for spreading the cost burden it would create.
The Council's proposal contains no Europe-wide harmonised arrangements for spreading the cost burden it would create.
Distortions of competition would arise that could jeopardise competition structures that are viable in the long term, thereby preventing the completion of a single European internal market.
Distortions of competition would arise that could jeopardise competition structures that are viable in the long term, thereby preventing the completion of a single European internal market.
Compatibility with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Compatibility with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
The proposal is also incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The proposal is also incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The monitoring and storage of data must be rejected if the measures do not comply with three basic criteria in line with the European Court of Human Rights' interpretation of Article 8(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights: they must be laid down by law, necessary in a democratic society and serve one of the legitimate purposes specified in the Convention.
The monitoring and storage of data must be rejected if the measures do not comply with three basic criteria in line with the European Court of Human Rights' interpretation of Article 8(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights: they must be laid down by law, necessary in a democratic society and serve one of the legitimate purposes specified in the Convention.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Council document 11885/04 of 9 November 2004. .
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Council document 11885/04 of 9 November 2004. .
As has already been illustrated, it is debatable, to say the least, whether the proposal fulfils all the necessary criteria
As has already been illustrated, it is debatable, to say the least, whether the proposal fulfils all the necessary criteria
The European Court of Human Rights has stressed that the contracting states do not have unlimited discretion to subject individuals within their territory to clandestine surveillance.
The European Court of Human Rights has stressed that the contracting states do not have unlimited discretion to subject individuals within their territory to clandestine surveillance.
Given that corresponding powers, conferred on the ground that the intention is to defend democracy, threaten to undermine or destroy democracy, the Court stresses that contracting states are not allowed to adopt any measure they deem appropriate in order to combat espionage or terrorism. .
Given that corresponding powers, conferred on the ground that the intention is to defend democracy, threaten to undermine or destroy democracy, the Court stresses that contracting states are not allowed to adopt any measure they deem appropriate in order to combat espionage or terrorism. .
For the reasons outlined above, the rapporteur rejects the proposal for a framework decision and calls on the four Member States to withdraw their initiative.
For the reasons outlined above, the rapporteur rejects the proposal for a framework decision and calls on the four Member States to withdraw their initiative.
The rapporteur expects the Member States to produce a study proving the unquestionable need for the proposed data retention arrangements.
The rapporteur expects the Member States to produce a study proving the unquestionable need for the proposed data retention arrangements.
In addition to this, the data retention obligation, the definition of the data to be retained and the retention period should be dealt with separately from the other aspects of the proposal as the subject of a directive.
In addition to this, the data retention obligation, the definition of the data to be retained and the retention period should be dealt with separately from the other aspects of the proposal as the subject of a directive.
The Commission should draft an appropriate proposal.
The Commission should draft an appropriate proposal.
It should be pointed out that the proposal's objectives could be achieved simply by implementing the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime and improving crossborder cooperation in the area in question.
It should be pointed out that the proposal's objectives could be achieved simply by implementing the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime and improving crossborder cooperation in the area in question.
Before a final decision can be taken on new measures, the results of the requested study must be considered.
Before a final decision can be taken on new measures, the results of the requested study must be considered.
Should the Council's proposal unexpectedly obtain a majority, the requirement for a review of the measures in the form of an evaluation after three years in force should be incorporated into the text, so that the actual effectiveness of the measures can be established and the act of data retention justified.
Should the Council's proposal unexpectedly obtain a majority, the requirement for a review of the measures in the form of an evaluation after three years in force should be incorporated into the text, so that the actual effectiveness of the measures can be established and the act of data retention justified.
ÕIGUSKOMISJONI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
Hr Jean-Marie Cavada
Mr Jean-Marie Cavada
Teema: Prantsuse Vabariigi, Iirimaa, Rootsi Kuningriigi ja Ühendkuningriigi algatus, et nõukogu võtaks vastu raamotsuse eelnõu avalikkusele kättesaadavate elektroonilise side teenuste osutamisega seonduvate töödeldud ja salvestatud andmete ning avalike sidevõrkude kaudu edastatavate andmete säilitamise kohta kriminaalväärtegude ja -õigusrikkumiste, kaasa arvatud terrorismiaktide ärahoidmiseks, uurimiseks, kindlakstegemiseks ja jälitamiseks (8958/2004 - C6-0198/2004 - 2004/0813(CNS) )
Subject: Legal basis of the proposal by the French Republic, Ireland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom for the adoption by the Council of a Draft Framework Decision on the retention of data processed and stored in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or data on public communications networks for the purpose of prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of crime and criminal offences including terrorism (8958/2004 – C6‑0198/2004 – 2004/0813(CNS) )
ELTs seni avaldamata.
Not yet published in OJ .
Oma 18. jaanuari 2005. aasta kirjaga pöördus Teie eelkäija Jean-Louis Bourlanges kodukorra artikli 35 lõike 2 alusel õiguskomisjoni poole, et uuritaks teemana nimetatud ettepaneku õigusliku aluse kehtivust ja asjakohasust.
By letter of 18 January 2005 your predecessor, Mr Jean-Louis Bourlanges, asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above proposal was valid and appropriate.
Ettepanek põhineb ELi lepingu artikli 31 lõike 1 punktil c ja artikli 34 lõike 2 punktil b.
The proposal is based on Articles 31 paragraph 1(c) and 34 paragraph 2(b) of the EU Treaty.
Antud juhul on ELi lepingu artikli 39 alusel nõutav ainult konsulteerimine parlamendiga.
In this case, by application of Article 39 of the EU Treaty, Parliament need only be consulted.
Õigusasjade komisjon arutas eespool mainitud küsimust 3. veebruari ja 31. märtsi 2005. aasta koosolekutel.
The Committee considered the above question at its meetings of 3 February and 31 March 2005.
25. märtsil 2004 rõhutas Euroopa Ülemkogu, kui oluline on kehtestada eeskirjad, mis käsitlevad teenuste osutajate loodud andmete säilitamist, olles teadlik, et tänapäevased telekommunikatsioonivahendid avavad uusi teid rahvusvahelise kuritegevuse ja eelkõige terrorismi jaoks.
On 25 March 2004 the Council had called for rules to be established on the retention of data generated by service providers, in view of the fact that modern telecommunications opened up new avenues for international crime and terrorism in particular.
Vastuseks ülemkogu taotlusele ja selleks, et kaotada õiguslikud lahknevused liikmesriikide vahel, tehti nelja liikmesriigi algatusel (Prantsusmaa, Iirimaa, Ühendkuningriik ja Rootsi) ettepanek näha ette tõhus ja ühtlustatud süsteem nende töödeldud ja salvestatud andmete säilitamiseks, mis on seotud avalikkusele kättesaadavate elektroonilise side teenuste osutamisega, või nende andmete säilitamiseks, mida edastatakse avalike sidevõrkude kaudu, ning seda kriminaalväärtegude ja -õigusrikkumiste, kaasa arvatud terrorismiaktide ärahoidmiseks, uurimiseks, kindlakstegemiseks ja jälitamiseks.
In response to the Council's request and to remedy the legal disparities between the Member States, four Member States (France, Ireland, the United Kingdom and Sweden) proposed providing an efficient and harmonised system for retention of data processed and stored in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or data on public communications networks for the purpose of prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of crime and criminal offences including terrorism.
Euroopa Kohtu väljakujunenud tavadest nähtub selgelt, et õigusliku aluse puhul ei ole ühenduse seadusandjal diskretsiooni, vaid see alus peab põhinema objektiivsetel elementidel, mida kohus saab kontrollida.
It is clear from Court of Justice case-law that the choice of the legal basis is not left to the discretion of the Community legislator, but that it must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review.
Nende elementide hulga kuulub eelkõige õigusakti eesmärk ja sisu
Those factors include in particular the aim and content of the measure
Vt muu hulgas Euroopa Kohtu lahendit kohtuasjas C-42/97: Parlament versus nõukogu, lõige 36. .
See in particular ECJ, Case C-42/97, Parliament v. Council, paragraph 36 .
Esiteks tuleb ühtlustada õigusakti kohaldamisalasse kuuluvate elektroonilise side erinevate andmete liigid ja määrata kindlaks ajavahemik, mille kestel tuleb neid andmeid säilitada, ning teiseks tuleb kehtestada liikmesriikidevahelised juurdepääsutingimused kõnesolevatele andmetele kriminaalasjades antava õigusabi vahendite kaudu, mis on juba vastu võetud.
The content of the proposal specifies the means to achieve the declared aim: harmonising the categories of electronic communications data to be covered and determining how long such data must be retained; it also sets out the conditions of access to such data between Member States via the mutual assistance instruments on criminal matters that have already been adopted.
EÜT L 201, 31.07.2002, lk 37. , ning Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiviga nr 95/46/EÜ üksikisikute kaitse kohta isikuandmete töötlemisel ja selliste andmete vaba liikumise kohta
OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p.37 and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
EÜT L 281, 23.11.1995, lk 31. .
OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.31 .
Eespool nimetatud ühenduse õigusaktid, mis põhinevad EÜ asutamislepingu artiklil 95, reguleerivad niisiis juba valdkonda, mis on seotud andmetöötlusega, samal ajal kui kõnesoleva ettepaneku eesmärk on ühtlustada erinevate andmete liigid, mida teenuste osutajad peavad säilitama teatud kindla aja jooksul, samuti nimetatud perioodi kindlaksmääramine.
The Community legislation referred to above, based on Article 95 of the EC Treaty, thus already governs issues concerning the processing of data, while the proposal in question aims to harmonise the categories of data to be retained by service providers during a fixed period and to fix the length of this period.
Tuleb aga meenutada, et ELi lepingu artikkel 47 sätestab:
It should be noted that Article 47 of the EU Treaty states:
“Kui seoses Euroopa Ühenduse asutamisega Euroopa Majandusühenduse asutamislepingut muutvatest ning Euroopa Söe- ja Teraseühenduse asutamislepingut ja Euroopa Aatomienergiaühenduse asutamislepingut muutvatest sätetest ja käesolevatest lõppsätetest ei tulene teisiti, ei mõjuta miski käesolevas lepingus Euroopa ühenduste asutamislepinguid ega hilisemaid lepinguid või õigusakte, mis neid muudavad või täiendavad.”
‘ Subject to the provisions amending the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community with a view to establishing the European Community, the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and to these final provisions, nothing in this Treaty shall affect the Treaties establishing the European Communities or the subsequent Treaties and Acts modifying or supplementing them. ’
ELi lepingu artikli 47 kohaselt ei ole niisiis lubatud mõjutada mõne ELi lepingul põhineva aktiga ühenduse õigustikku.
Thus under Article 47 of the EU Treaty it is not permissible for an act based on the EU Treaty to affect the acquis communautaire .
Niisiis tuleb teha selgeks, kas kõnesolevas ettepanekus kavandatud meetmed “mõjutavad” ühenduse õigust niisugusena, nagu see on eelkõige direktiivi nr 2002/58/EÜ sätete järgi.
Therefore the question arises whether the measures envisaged by the proposal ‘affect’ Community law as expressed in particular by the provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC.
Sellega seoses tuleb juhtida tähelepanu asjaolule, et direktiiv nr 2002/58/EÜ on juba kehtestanud terve rea kohustusi, mis on seotud erinevat liiki andmetega, mida ettevõtted peavad säilitama, ja nende säilitamise ajaga.
In this connection, it should be noted that Directive 2002/58/EC has already established a whole series of obligations with regard to the categories of data to be retained by economic operators and how long they must be retained.
Sellest järeldub, et igasugune muudatus selles valdkonnas, nagu seda soovib teha raamotsuse eelnõu, ei saa olla ELi lepingul põhineva õigusakti sisuks.
It follows that any change in this area, as is intended by the draft framework decision, cannot be made by an instrument based on the EU Treaty.
Järelikult võib väita, et kõnesoleva akti vastuvõtmine võib olla ELi lepingu artikli 47 rikkumine.
Therefore it could be maintained that adoption of the measure in question could constitute an infringement of Article 47 of the EU Treaty.
31. märtsi 2005. aasta koosolekul otsustas õigusasjade komisjon 11 poolthäälega (erapooletuid 2)
At its meeting of 31 March 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, by 11 votes with two abstentions
Hääletamise ajal olid kohal Andrzej Jan Szejna (tegevesimees), Manuel Medina Ortega (arvamuse raportöör, keda esindas tema asetäitja Nicola Zingaretti), Alexander Nuno Alvaro (keda esindas asetäitja Antonio Di Pietro), Maria Berger, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Bert Doorn, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner (keda esindas asetäitja Antonio López-Istúriz White), Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Alain Lipietz, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas ja Jaroslav Zvěřina. , et:
The following were present for the vote: Andrzej Jan Szejna (acting chairman), Manuel Medina Ortega (draftsman, and for Nicola Zingaretti), Alexander Nuno Alvaro (for Antonio Di Pietro), Maria Berger, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Bert Doorn, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner (for Antonio López-Istúriz White), Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Alain Lipietz, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas and Jaroslav Zvěřina. , that:
· erinevate andmete liikide ühtlustamine, mida teenuste osutajad säilitama peavad, samuti andmete säilitamise ajavahemik kuuluvad vastavalt direktiivile nr 2002/58/EÜ ühenduse õigustiku kohaldamisalasse;
· harmonisation of the categories of data and the length of time such data must be retained by service providers is part of the acquis communautaire arising from Directive 2002/58/EC;
· raamotsus, mis põhineb ELi lepingu VI jaotisel ja mille eesmärk oleks muuta niisuguseid elemente, mõjutaks nimetatud direktiivi sätteid ja võiks järelikult olla ELi lepingu artikli 47 rikkumine;
· a framework decision based on Title VI of the EU Treaty aiming to modify these elements would affect the provisions of that directive and could in consequence constitute an infringement of Article 47 of the EU Treaty;
· mis puudutab erinevate andmete liikide ühltustamist, mida teenuste osutajad säilitama peavad, ja andmete säilitamise aega, siis on mõlema puhul sobiv õiguslik alus sama, mis on kehtestatud juba kehtiva ühenduse õigustiku raames, nimelt EÜ asutamislepingu artikliga 95;
· with regard to the harmonisation of categories of data and the length of time they must be retained by service providers, the appropriate legal basis is that established by the pre-existing Community framework, Article 95 of the EC Treaty;
· lähtudes nendest kaalutlustest oleks seega mõeldav kehtestada kaks eraldi õigusakti: esimene, mis põhineb esimesel sambal (EÜ asutamisleping) ja käsitleb erinevate andmete liikide ühtlustamist ja nende säilitamise aega, ning teine, mis põhineb kolmandal sambal (ELi leping) ning käsitleb aspekte, mis on seotud koostööga kriminaalasjades, eelkõige juurdepääsuga kõnealustele andmetele ja nende vahetamisega.
· in the light of these considerations, two separate measures could be envisaged: one based on the first pillar (ECT) on harmonisation of categories of data and the length of time such data must be retained, and the other based on the third pillar (TEU) on aspects relating to cooperation on criminal matters, in particular on the subject of access to and exchange of such data.
Prantsuse Vabariigi, Iirimaa, Rootsi Kuningriigi ja Ühendkuningriigi algatus võtta vastu raamotsuse eelnõu avalikkusele kättesaadavate elektroonilise side teenuste osutamisega seonduvate töödeldud ja salvestatud andmete ning avalike sidevõrkude kaudu edastatavate andmete säilitamise kohta kriminaalväärtegude ja -õigusrikkumiste, kaasa arvatud terrorismiaktide ärahoidmiseks, uurimiseks, kindlakstegemiseks ja jälitamiseks.
Initiative by the French Republic, Ireland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom for a Draft Framework Decision on the retention of data processed and stored in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or data on public communications networks for the purpose of prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of crime and criminal offences including terrorism.
art 39 lg 1 (EÜ)
Article 39 (1) EU
art 93, 51 ja 35
Article 93, 51 and 35
Naiste roll Türgi sotsiaal-, majandus- ja poliitilises elus
on the role of women in Turkey in social, economic and political life
naiste rolli kohta Türgi sotsiaal-, majandus- ja poliitilises elus
on the role of women in Turkey in social, economic and political life
– võttes arvesse komisjoni 2004. aasta korralist aruannet ja 6. oktoobri 2004. aasta soovitust Türgi edusammude kohta ühinemise suunas ( KOM(2004)0656 )
­ having regard to the 2004 regular report and the recommendation of the European Commission on Turkey’s progress towards accession of 6 October 2004 ( COM(2004)0656 )
ELT C 13, 19.1.2005, lk 3. ning oma 15. detsembri 2004. aasta resolutsiooni
OJ C 13, 19.1.2005, p.3. and its resolution
Vastu võetud tekst P6_TA(2004)0096 . antud aruande kohta;
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2004)0096 . of 15 December 2004 on this report,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Ülemkogu 17. detsembri 2004. aasta otsust alustada Türgiga läbirääkimisi Euroopa Liiduga ühinemise üle;
­ having regard to the decision of the European Council of 17 December 2004 to open negotiations with Turkey concerning accession to the European Union,