natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Piirivalveametnikud pööravad erilist tähelepanu alaealistele, kes reisivad kas saatjaga või saatjata.
Border guards shall pay particular attention to minors, whether travelling accompanied or unaccompanied.
Välispiiri ületavaid alaealisi tuleb sisenemisel ja väljumisel kontrollida samamoodi kui täiskasvanuidki, nagu on sätestatud käesolevas määruses.
Minors crossing the external border shall be subject to the same checks on entry and exit as adults, as provided for in this Regulation.
Saatjaga liikuvate alaealiste puhul kontrollib piirivalveametnik ka seda, et alaealisi saatev isik on nende vanemlik hooldaja, eriti juhul, kui alaealistega on kaasas vaid üks täiskasvanu ning kui on tõsine alus arvata, et alaealised on lahutatud nende seadusjärgsest vanemlikust hooldajast/seadusjärgsetest vanemlikest hooldajatest ebaseaduslikult.
In the case of accompanied minors, the border guard shall check that the persons accompanying minors have parental care over them, especially where minors are accompanied by only one adult and there are serious grounds for suspecting that they may have been unlawfully removed from the custody of the person(s) legally exercising parental care over them.
Viimasel juhul teostab piirivalveametnik edasist uurimist, et tuvastada võimalikud lahknevused või vasturääkivused esitatud andmete vahel.
In the latter case, the border guard shall carry out further investigation in order to detect any inconsistencies or contradictions between the information given.
Juhul kui alaealised reisivad saatjata, peavad piirivalveametnikud reisidokumentide ja täiendavate dokumentide põhjaliku kontrollimisega tagama, et alaealised ei lahku territooriumilt oma vanemliku hooldaja/vanemlike hooldajate tahte vastaselt.
In the case of minors travelling unaccompanied, border guards shall ensure, by means of thorough checks on travel documents and supporting documents, that the minors do not leave the territory against the wishes of the person(s) having parental care over them.
RIIGI LOGO (Ameti nimi)
LOGO OF STATE (Name of Office)
Islandilt ja Norralt ei nõuta logo.
No logo required for Iceland and Norway
LÜHIAJALISE VIIBIMISE KESTUST KÄSITLEVATE NÕUETE TÄITMISE TÕENDITE HEAKSKIITMINE JUHUTUDEL KUI REISIDOKUMENDIS EI OLE SISSESÕIDUTEMPLIT
APPROVAL OF THE EVIDENCE REGARDING THE RESPECT OF THE CONDITION OF THE DURATION OF A SHORT STAY IN CASES WHERE THE TRAVEL DOCUMENT DOES NOT BEAR AN ENTRY STAMP
Allakirjutanud asutus,, on küsitlenud järgmist isikut:
We, the undersigning authority, __________________________________________________ have before us:
Perekonnanimi __________________________________ Eesnimi __________________________________
Surname __________________________________ First name _____________________________
Sünnikuupäev ____________________________ Sünnikoht __________________________ Sugu: ______
Date of birth ___________________________ Place of birth _______________________ Sex: ______
Reisidokument: ________________________ nr
Travel document ________________________ number _______________________________
Välja antud ________________________________ (koht) ________________________________(kuupäev)
Issued in _______________________________ on _________________________________________
Viisa nr_______________ (vajadusel) välja antud (asutus)
Visa number_______________ (if applicable) issued by _________________________________________
____ päevaks järgmistel põhjustel: ________________________________________
for a period of ____ days on the following grounds: ________________________________________
Võttes arvesse isiku poolt esitatud tõendeid viibimise kestuse kohta liikmesriikide territooriumil, loetakse isik sisenenuks liikmesriigi territooriumile ______________ (riik) ___________(kuupäev) _______(koht)________ (piiripunkt)
Having regard to the evidence relating to the duration of his (her) stay on the territory of the Member States that he (she) has provided, he (she) is considered to have entered the territory of the Member State ______________on ___________at _______at the border point________
Allakirjutanud asutuse kontaktandmed:
Contact details of the undersigning authority:
Asjaomasele isikule antakse käesoleva dokumendi koopia.
The person concerned shall receive a copy of this document.
Since the Treaty of Amsterdam "standards and procedures to be followed by Member States in carrying out checks on persons at such borders [external border]" (Art. 62.2a) and "measures with a view to ensuring [...] the absence of any controls on persons [...] when crossing internal borders" (Art. 62.1) fall into the competence of the Community.
Since the Treaty of Amsterdam "standards and procedures to be followed by Member States in carrying out checks on persons at such borders [external border]" (Art. 62.2a) and "measures with a view to ensuring [...] the absence of any controls on persons [...] when crossing internal borders" (Art. 62.1) fall into the competence of the Community.
Currently it is not competent for the reintroduction of internal border controls (Art. 68.2 TEC, Art. 2.3, 3rd indent of the protocol integrating the Schengen acquis).
Currently it is not competent for the reintroduction of internal border controls (Art. 68.2 TEC, Art. 2.3, 3rd indent of the protocol integrating the Schengen acquis).
The rapporteur requests Council to adjust the power of the Court as provided for in Art. 67.2 2nd indent in order to close this gap as already requested by Parliament and Commission.
The rapporteur requests Council to adjust the power of the Court as provided for in Art. 67.2 2nd indent in order to close this gap as already requested by Parliament and Commission.
"These assessments are couched in courteous, diplomatic terms, and the procedure is basically a peer review of the relevant administrative bodies, so that what the outside observer sees is an exchange of compliments allowing the Member States being visited to basically look good (window dressing)." p.
"These assessments are couched in courteous, diplomatic terms, and the procedure is basically a peer review of the relevant administrative bodies, so that what the outside observer sees is an exchange of compliments allowing the Member States being visited to basically look good (window dressing)." p.
"But where the Community level falls short of expectations is that Schengen evaluations (Scheval) are not formalised to the extent of becoming a genuine inspection...the credibility of the management of the Union's external borders now requires greater uniformity and rigor of control ...nor is it satisfactory that the comments made give place only to purely formal answers by the services checked and that the requests for "corrections" to the situations not in conformity with Schengen law are not mandatory for the administration evaluated, that the recommendations made are not followed up in actual implementation, and lastly that no penalties are possible for serious failures by Schengen States to meet their commitments." p.
"But where the Community level falls short of expectations is that Schengen evaluations (Scheval) are not formalised to the extent of becoming a genuine inspection...the credibility of the management of the Union's external borders now requires greater uniformity and rigor of control ...nor is it satisfactory that the comments made give place only to purely formal answers by the services checked and that the requests for "corrections" to the situations not in conformity with Schengen law are not mandatory for the administration evaluated, that the recommendations made are not followed up in actual implementation, and lastly that no penalties are possible for serious failures by Schengen States to meet their commitments." p.
19 Feasibility Study on the control of the European Union's maritime borders Furthermore, evaluations of a Member State take only place every few years and cannot prevent practices which are not in conformity with the law to develop.
19 Feasibility Study on the control of the European Union's maritime borders Furthermore, evaluations of a Member State take only place every few years and cannot prevent practices which are not in conformity with the law to develop.
Council doc.
Council doc.
15275/04 This second task should therefore be a task for the Commission with the right to inspect without prior notice.
15275/04 This second task should therefore be a task for the Commission with the right to inspect without prior notice.
To this end the rapporteur supports the role of the Commission in the reintroduction of internal border controls as proposed by the Commission although Member States in the discussions in Council seem to try to limit it.
To this end the rapporteur supports the role of the Commission in the reintroduction of internal border controls as proposed by the Commission although Member States in the discussions in Council seem to try to limit it.
He also introduces amendments reinforcing the right of Parliament to be informed.
He also introduces amendments reinforcing the right of Parliament to be informed.
This was also confirmed in an empirical study; See F. Bovenkerk, Er zijn grenzen (Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1989) at pp. 13-14.
This was also confirmed in an empirical study; See F. Bovenkerk, Er zijn grenzen (Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1989) at pp. 13-14.
ÕIGUSKOMISJONI ARVAMUS ETTE PANDUD ÕIGUSLIKU ALUSE KOHTA
OPINION of the Committee ON LEGAL AFFAIRS on the proposed legal basis
30. märtsi 2005. aasta kirjas tegite te vastavalt kodukorra artikli 35 lõikele 2 õiguskomisjonile ülesandeks kontrollida eespool nimetatud komisjoni ettepaneku õigusliku aluse õigsust ja sobivust.
By letter of 30 March 2005 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Parlamendikomisjon arutas eespool nimetatud küsimust 21. aprilli 2005. aasta koosolekul.
The Committee considered the above question at its meeting of 21 April 2005.
Nimetatud määruse õigusliku alusena on esitatud EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõige 1 ja lõike 2 punkt a.
The legal basis proposed for this regulation is Article 62(1) and (2)(a) of the EC Treaty.
Seoses mõnede muudatusettepanekute sisseviimisega kavatseb kodanikuvabaduste, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjoni raportöör Michael Cashman lisada täiendava õigusliku alusena EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõike 3.
The rapporteur for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Mr Michael Cashman, proposes adding Article 62(3) of the EC Treaty as an additional legal basis made necessary by the introduction of certain amendments.
Täiendava õigusliku aluse lisamise teeb vajalikuks raportööri ettepanek tühistada 14. juuni 1985. aasta Schengeni lepingu rakenduskonventsiooni artikkel 22 (muudatusettepanekud 85 ja 70)
In this connection the rapporteur proposes repealing Article 22 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 (Amendments 85 and 70)
Schengeni konventsiooni artiklis 22 nähakse ette, et "välismaalased" peavad "riiki sisenedes või kolme tööpäeva jooksul alates riiki sisenemisest" teatama endast pädevatele ametivõimudele.
Article 22 of the Schengen Convention states that ‘aliens’ are required to report to the competent authorities ‘either on entry or within three working days of entry’.
Liikmesriigid kehtestavad vastavad tingimused ja erandid. .
The Member States are to lay down the conditions and exemptions for this. .
Siinkohal tuleb esmalt meelde tuletada, et vastavalt nõukogu 20. mai 1999. aasta otsusele 1999/436/EÜ, millega on määratud kooskõlas EÜ asutamislepingu ja EL lepingu asjakohaste sätetega kindlaks iga Schengeni a cquis' d moodustava sätte või otsuse õiguslik alus, on kõnealuse artikli 22 õiguslik alus EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõige 3 (vt lisa A ja ülalnimetatud otsuse artiklit 2).
It should first be borne in mind that, in accordance with Council Decision 1999/436/EC of 20 May 1999 determining, in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Treaty on European Union, the legal basis for each of the provisions or decisions which constitute the Schengen acquis, the legal basis for the Article 22 in question is Article 62(3) of the EC Treaty (see Annex A and Article 2 of the above Decision).
Sellest järeldub selgelt, et EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõige 3 on nõuetekohane õiguslik alus Schengeni lepingu rakenduskonventsiooni artikli 22 muutmiseks.
It follows, clearly, that Article 62(3) of the EC Treaty constitutes the appropriate legal basis for any action by the legislator the subject of which is the said Article 22 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement.
Teiseks tuleb tähele panna, et kavandatav õigusliku aluse täiendus ei muudaks õigusakti vastuvõtmise menetlust, kuivõrd vastavalt nõukogu 22. detsembri 2004. aasta otsusele (2004/927/EÜ), mis näeb ette Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artiklis 251 osutatud menetluse kohaldamist teatud valdkondade suhtes, mis on hõlmatud kõnealuse asutamislepingu kolmanda osa IV jaotisega, on mõlemal juhul nõutav kaasotsustamismenetlus.
Second, it should be observed that the proposed addition would not have the effect of changing the procedure for adopting the act, since codecision is required in both cases, under Council Decision 2004/927/EC of 22 December 2004 providing for certain areas covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure laid down in Article 251 of that Treaty.
Johtuvalt ülaltoodud tähelepanekutest ja raportöör Manuel Medina Ortega ettepanekul otsustas õiguskomisjon 21. aprilli 2005. aasta koosolekul ühehäälselt
In view of these considerations and on a proposal by its draftsman Mr Manuel Medina Ortega, at its meeting of 21 April 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided unanimously
Hääletuse ajal viibisid kohal: Giuseppe Gargani (esimees), Manuel Medina Ortega (soovituse koostaja ja Maria Bergeri asendusliige), Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Kurt Lechner (Bert Doorni asendusliige), Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas, József Szájer (Rainer Wielandi asendusliige), Nicola Zingaretti ja Jaroslav Zvěřina. anda nõusolek muudatusettepanekule, millega lisatakse komisjoni väljapakutud EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõikele 1 ja lõike 2 punktile a täiendava õigusliku alusena EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõige 3.
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Manuel Medina Ortega (draftsman and for Maria Berger), Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Kurt Lechner (for Bert Doorn), Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas, József Szájer (for Rainer Wieland), Nicola Zingaretti and Jaroslav Zvěřina. to deliver a favourable opinion on the tabling of an amendment adding Article 62(3) of the EC Treaty as an additional legal basis to Article 62(1) and (2)(a) of the EC Treaty as proposed by the Commission.
arengukomisjonI ARVAMUS
OPINION of the Committee on Development
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse ettepanek kehtestada ühenduse seadustik reeglite kohta inimeste piiriülesel liikumisel
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders
Määruse ettepaneku eesmärgiks on selgitada, ümber korraldada, konsolideerida ja arendada kehtivat seadusandlust inimeste kontrolli kohta piiril.
The objectives of the proposed regulation are to clarify, restructure, consolidate and develop existing legislation on border controls on persons.
Eelkõige üritatakse määrusega kehtestada ühenduse seadustik inimeste piiriülese liikumise reguleerimiseks.
In particular, the regulation seeks to establish a Community Code governing the movement of persons across borders.
See on üks osa lühiajalistest meetmetest, mis pakuti välja komisjoni 2002. aasta mai teatises “Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikide välispiiride ühtse haldussüsteemi loomise suunas”.
It forms part of the measures to be taken in the short term that were announced in the Commission's May 2002 Communication entitled 'Towards integrated management of the external borders of the Member States of the European Union'.
Peamine eesmärk on anda “ühenduse mõõde” reeglitele, mis on välja töötatud Schengeni valitsustevahelistes raamkokkulepetes ja integreeritud asutamislepingusse alates 1999. aastast.
The main aim is to give a more 'Community' character and form to the rules that have been developed within the Schengen intergovernmental framework and integrated into the Treaty since May 1999.
Komisjoni ettepaneku kohaselt koosneb ühenduse seadustik kahest osast: üks osa on “välispiiride”, teine “sisepiiride” kohta.
The Community Code set out in the proposal contains two sections: one on 'external borders' and the other on 'internal borders'.
Teie raporti koostaja pööras põhitähelepanu esimesele osale, mis sisaldab kõiki reegleid inimeste kontrolli kohta välispiiril, sealhulgas: välispiiride ületamise ja liikmesriiki sisenemise tingimused; välispiiride kontrolli hõlmavad põhimõtted, sealhulgas ametlike piiriületuspunktide vaheline järelevalve ja välispiirilt tagasisaatmise tingimused; ning liikmesriikidevaheline koostöö, sealhulgas piirikontrolli läbiviimine.
Your draftsman focused on the first section, which includes all the rules on the control of persons at external borders, including the following: the conditions for crossing external borders and for entry to Member States; the principles governing controls at external borders, including surveillance between authorised border crossing-points and the conditions for refusal of entry; and cooperation between Member States, including the implementation of border checks.
Seadustikuga kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud erireeglid eri liiki piiridel (maismaa, õhu, mere) piirikontrolli läbiviimiseks ja erimenetlused erinevatesse kategooriatesse kuuluvate inimeste jaoks (meremehed, piloodid, diplomaadid jne).
The Code lays down special detailed rules for border checks for different kinds of borders (land, air and maritime) and specific procedures for certain categories of persons (seamen, aircraft pilots, diplomats, etc.).
Teie raporti koostaja pooldab eelkõige välispiiride haldamise “ühtseks muutmist” kui EL reeglite lihtsustamise ja ühtlustamise üht osa.
Your draftsman strongly advocates the 'communitisation' of the management of external borders as part of the simplification and harmonisation of EU rules.
Määruse põhiosa on tehnilist laadi, mis ei kuulu arengukomisjoni lähteülesannete alla.
The main body of the regulation is of a technical nature, which goes beyond the terms of reference of the Development Committee.
Seetõttu on Teie raporti koostaja osutanud muudatusettepanekute tegemisel pöörata põhitähelepanu üksnes alljärgnevatele peamistele aspektidele:
That is why your draftsman has focused his amendments on a only few fundamental aspects, as follows:
- Piirikontrolli läbiviimisel inimeste põhiõiguste austamine, sealhulgas võitlemine mis tahes diskrimineerimise vastu, võttes aluseks Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta (määruse artiklid 3 ja 6).
- Respect for fundamental rights in the application of border controls, to include the fight against any discrimination, taking the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union as the reference point (Articles 3 and 6 of the Regulation).
- Humanitaarsete kaalutluste ja hädaabi kasutuselevõtmine põhisätetest erandite tegemise arvestatavate põhjendustena (artiklid 4 ja 5).
- Introduction of humanitarian concerns or emergency situations as valid reasons for derogating from the basic provisions (Articles 4 and 5).
- Tagatis, et piirilt tagasisaatmist põhjendatakse objektiivsetel alustel, välistamaks nii palju kui võimalik meelevaldsete otsuste tegemist, mis võivad põhjustada põhjendamatut diskrimineerimist, ning kohustus edastada kolmanda riigi kodanikele asjakohast teavet (neile arusaadavas keeles) reeglitest, mis hõlmavad piirilt tagasisaatmist, samuti nende õigusest algatada kaebuse esitamise menetlust vastavalt siseriiklikule õigusele.
- A guarantee that refusals will be substantiated and based on objective grounds, in order to rule out as far as possible arbitrary decisions which may lead to unjustified discrimination, and an obligation to provide third-country nationals with relevant information (in a language they can understand) on the rules governing refusal of entry, as well as on their right to initiate appeal proceedings in accordance with national law.
Teie raporti koostaja pidas seda põhiõiguseks, mida tuleks aktiivselt jõustada (artikkel 11).
Your draftsman considered this to be a fundamental right which should be actively enforced (Article 11).
- Võimaluse andmine kaebuse tüüpvormi täitmiseks juhul, kui kolmanda riigi kodanik peaks tundma, et teda on piiril halvasti koheldud.
- Provision for the option of filling in a standard complaint form, should a third-country national consider that he or she has been mistreated at the border post.
Diskrimineerimisvastane võitlus, eelkõige immigratsiooni valdkonnas, peaks jõudma põhimõtete deklareerimisest tegudeni ning seda peaks lihtsate, kuid tõhusate kontrollimeetmetega tugevdama.
The fight against discrimination, especially in the immigration field, should go beyond mere statements of principle and should therefore be reinforced with a simple but potentially effective control measure.
Nimetatud kaebuse tüüpvormile on viidatud muudatusettepanekus 12 (määruse VIII lisa C osa).
A model for such a complaint form is put forward in Amendment 12 (Annex VIII, Part C of the regulation).
Komisjoni iga-aastase II jao rakendamise aruande Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule esitamise kohustuse kasutuselevõtmine (välispiiride haldamine).
- Introduction of an obligation on the part of the Commission to submit an annual report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Title II (management of external borders).
Praegusel kujul sätestab määrus üksnes III jao (sisepiiride haldamine) kohta aruande esitamise kohustuse Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule kolm aastat pärast määruse jõustumist.
The regulation in its present form provides for the submission of a report to the European Parliament and the Council, three years after its entry into force, covering only Title III (management of internal borders).
Teie raporti koostaja pidas oluliseks regulaarselt jälgida piirilt tagasisaatmise ning kaebuste vormide ja vaidlusavalduste menetluse järelmeetmete rakendamise statistikat, et kindlaks teha ja lahendada peamised probleemid (artikkel 32a).
Your draftsman considered it essential to monitor on a regular basis the statistics concerning refusals of entry and the follow-up of complaint forms and appeal proceedings, in order to identify and address major difficulties (Article 32 a).
(6 a) Käesoleva määruse eesmärk on tagada inimeste turvalisus, õigused ja vabadused.
(6a) The purpose of this Regulation is to guaranteethe security, rights and freedoms of persons.
Nimetatud õigused ning paljudel juhtudel isegi isikute füüsiline puutumatus ja elu on suurel määral ohustatud, kui üldjuhul ebaseaduslikeks rändevoogudeks kasutatakse teatavaid kohti maa- või merepiiril, mis ei ole piiriületuspunktid.
These rights, and in many cases even the physical integrity and lives of persons, are endangered to a greater extent when certain crossing points on land or sea borders without border posts are used, generally for illegal migration flows.
Põhjendus 6 b (uus)
Recital 6 b (new)