natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Artikli 13 osas jõustavad liikmesriigid käesoleva direktiivi järgimiseks vajalikud õigusnormid hiljemalt [36 kuud pärast selle vastuvõtmise kuupäeva].
Concerning Article 13, Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [36 months after the date of its adoption].
Liikmesriigid teatavad sellest viivitamata komisjonile.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
I lisa B lisa lõige 1
Annex B to the Annex I, paragraph 1
Riiki loetakse turvaliseks päritoluriigiks, kui õigusliku olukorra, õigusaktide demokraatlikus süsteemis kohaldamise ja üldiste poliitiliste olude põhjal on võimalik tõestada, et riigis ei toimu üldist ja järjekindlat tagakiusamist vastavalt nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ artiklile 9 ega piinamist või muud inimväärikust alandavat kohtlemist või karistamist ning et seal ei ole rahvusvahelise või riigisisese relvastatud konfliktiga kaasnevast valimatust vägivallast tingitud ohtu.
A country is considered as a safe country of origin where, on the basis of the legal situation, the application of the law within a democratic system and the general political circumstances, it can be shown that there is generally and consistently no persecution as defined in Article 9 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC ; no torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; and no threat by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict.
Riiki loetakse turvaliseks päritoluriigiks, kui õigusliku olukorra, õigusaktide demokraatlikus süsteemis kohaldamise ja üldiste poliitiliste olude põhjal on võimalik tõestada, et riigis ei toimu üldist ja järjekindlat tagakiusamist vastavalt nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ artiklile 9 ega piinamist või muud inimväärikust alandavat kohtlemist või karistamist ning et seal ei ole rahvusvahelise või riigisisese relvastatud konfliktiga kaasnevast valimatust vägivallast tingitud ohtu ega ole mingeid tõendeid inimeste diskrimineerimisest seoses rassi, etnilise tausta, usu, rahvuse, mingisse konkreetsesse sotsiaalsesse gruppi kuulumise või poliitilise arvamusega .
A country is considered as a safe country of origin where, on the basis of the legal situation, the application of the law within a democratic system and the general political circumstances, it can be shown that there is generally and consistently no persecution as defined in Article 9 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC; no torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; no threat by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict ; and no evidence of discrimination against individuals on account of race, ethnic background, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion .
I lisa B lisa lõike 2 punkt d a (uus)
Annex B to the Annex I, paragraph 2, point (d a) (new)
d a) UNCHRi ja teiste inimõiguste ja üksikisikute õiguste kaitsmise valdkonnas tegelevate organisatsioonide olemasolevate ja ajakohaste aruannetega.
(da) available and up-to-date reports by the UNHCR and other organisations working in the field of human rights and the protection of individual rights.
The new draft directive was issued on 18 June 2002.
The new draft directive was issued on 18 June 2002.
The amended proposal sets out a new structure for asylum procedures in the Member States and the “general approach” text departs from a considerable number of minimum standards originally proposed by the Commission.
The amended proposal sets out a new structure for asylum procedures in the Member States and the “general approach” text departs from a considerable number of minimum standards originally proposed by the Commission.
Considering all the facts mentioned before, the rapporteur concludes that the Parliament should only adopt the proposed directive under the condition, that its amendments, particularly with regard to the following points, will be implemented by the Council in the suggested way and with regard to the Parliament's future privilege of codecision.
Considering all the facts mentioned before, the rapporteur concludes that the Parliament should only adopt the proposed directive under the condition, that its amendments, particularly with regard to the following points, will be implemented by the Council in the suggested way and with regard to the Parliament's future privilege of codecision.
The concepts of effective remedy (article 38) and accelerated procedures (articles 23-25) as well as the procedures on borders (Case of border procedures - article 35) have to be revised substantially.
The concepts of effective remedy (article 38) and accelerated procedures (articles 23-25) as well as the procedures on borders (Case of border procedures - article 35) have to be revised substantially.
Ø The article about the effective remedy does not guarantee that the appeal process has suspensive effect.
Ø The article about the effective remedy does not guarantee that the appeal process has suspensive effect.
The Directive states that Member States may "refrain from appointing a representative where the unaccompanied minor is 16 years old or older...".According to the UN-Convention on the Rights of the Child, any person under age 18 should be considered as a child, without differentiation in rights for those over 16.
The Directive states that Member States may "refrain from appointing a representative where the unaccompanied minor is 16 years old or older...".According to the UN-Convention on the Rights of the Child, any person under age 18 should be considered as a child, without differentiation in rights for those over 16.
Due to these severe reservations, the rapporteur expects the Council to give his opinion concerning the major concerns mentioned before and the further proceeding in due time.
Due to these severe reservations, the rapporteur expects the Council to give his opinion concerning the major concerns mentioned before and the further proceeding in due time.
ARVAMUS Esitaja: arengukomisjon
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT
COM(2000)0578 . on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status in September 2000.
COM(2000)0578 . on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status in September 2000.
COM(2002)0326 . and after almost two years of negotiations the Council agreed on a "general approach"
COM(2002)0326 . and after almost two years of negotiations the Council agreed on a "general approach"
CSL 14203/04, 9 November 2004 on which it decided to consult again the Parliament, which was done on 19 November 2004.
CSL 14203/04, 9.11.2004 on which it decided to consult the Parliament again, which was done on 19 November 2004.
CSL 14203/04, 9. november 2004.
CSL 14203/04, 9.11.2004
a) Käesoleva direktiivi rakendamine ja riiklikesse õigusaktidesse ülevõtmine toimub, arvestades põhiinimõigusi ja põhimõtteid, mida tunnustab esmajoones Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta ühenduse õiguse üldiste põhimõtetena.
(a) This Directive shall be implemented and transposed into national legislation with due respect for fundamental human rights and principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as general principles of Community law.
Liikmesriigid ei pea isikut kinni ainult sel põhjusel, et viimane on varjupaigataotleja.
Member States shall not hold a person in detention for the sole reason that he/she is an applicant for asylum.
Liikmesriigid ei pea isikut kinni sel põhjusel, et viimane on varjupaigataotleja.
Member States shall not hold a person in detention for the reason that he/she is an applicant for asylum.
Nõukogu võib komisjoni ettepaneku põhjal ja pärast konsulteerimist Euroopa Parlamendiga muuta kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega ühist miinimumnimekirja, lisades või kustutades kolmandaid riike vastavalt II lisale.
The Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament , amend the minimum common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II.
Komisjon vaatab läbi kõik nõukogu või liikmesriigi poolt talle suunatud taotlused ühise miinimumnimekirja muutmisettepaneku esitamiseks.
The Commission shall examine any request made by the Council or by a Member State that it submit a proposal to amend the minimum common list.
Nõukogu võib vastavalt EÜ asutamislepingu artiklis 251 sätestatud menetluskorrale muuta ühist miinimumnimekirja, lisades või kustutades kolmandaid riike vastavalt II lisale.
The Council may, acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the EC Treaty , amend the minimum common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II.
Komisjon vaatab läbi kõik nõukogu, liikmesriigi või Euroopa Parlamendi poolt talle suunatud taotlused ühise miinimumnimekirja muutmisettepaneku esitamiseks.
The Commission shall examine any request made by the Council , by a Member State or by the European Parliament that it submit a proposal to amend the minimum common list.
The aim of this amendment is to fully integrate the European Parliament in any further decision involving the adoption and modification of the minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin.
The aim of this amendment is to fully integrate the European Parliament in any further decision involving the adoption and modification of the minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin.
In fact, according to Article 67 TEC, after the approval of this Directive further decisions should be adopted with the codecision procedure.
In fact, according to Article 67 TEC, after the approval of this Directive further decisions should be adopted with the codecision procedure.
The adoption and modification of such a sensitive element as the minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin should not be an exception and therefore the European Parliament should be fully involved in its adoption and modification.
The adoption and modification of such a sensitive element as the minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin should not be an exception and therefore the European Parliament should be fully involved in its adoption and modification.
Lõigete 1 või 2 alusel ettepaneku tegemisel kasutab komisjon olemasolevat enda teavet, liikmesriikidelt ning vajaduse korral UNHCRilt, Euroopa Nõukogult ja teistelt asjaomastelt rahvusvahelistelt organisatsioonidelt saadud teavet.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States, its own information and, where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Lõigete 1 või 2 alusel ettepaneku tegemisel kasutab komisjon olemasolevat enda teavet, liikmesriikidelt ja Euroopa Parlamendilt ning vajaduse korral UNHCRilt, Euroopa Nõukogult ja teistelt asjaomastelt rahvusvahelistelt organisatsioonidelt saadud teavet.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States and the European Parliament , its own information and, where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Kui nõukogu palub komisjonil esitada ettepanek kolmanda riigi ühisest miinimumnimekirjast kustutamise kohta, peatatakse liikmesriikide artikli 30B lõikest 2 tulenev kohustus vastava kolmanda riigi suhtes järgmisel päeval pärast nõukogu otsust paluda komisjonil esitada selline ettepanek.
Where the Council requests the Commission to submit a proposal for removing a third country from the minimum common list, the obligation of Member States pursuant to Article 30B(2) shall be suspended with regard to this third country as of the day following the Council decision requesting such a submission.
Kui nõukogu või Euroopa Parlament palub komisjonil esitada ettepanek kolmanda riigi ühisest miinimumnimekirjast kustutamise kohta, peatatakse liikmesriikide artikli 30B lõikest 2 tulenev kohustus vastava kolmanda riigi suhtes järgmisel päeval pärast nõukogu otsust paluda komisjonil esitada selline ettepanek.
Where the Council or the European Parliament requests the Commission to submit a proposal for removing a third country from the minimum common list, the obligation of Member States pursuant to Article 30B(2) shall be suspended with regard to this third country as of the day following the Council decision requesting such a submission.
Komisjon esitab nõukogu taotlusel nõukogule ja Euroopa Parlamendile aruande selle kohta, kas olukord ühises miinimumnimekirjas olevas riigis on endiselt kooskõlas II lisaga.
Upon request by the Council, the Commission shall report to the Council and the European Parliament on whether the situation of a country on the minimum common list is still in conformity with Annex II.
Komisjon esitab nõukogu või Euroopa Parlamendi taotlusel nõukogule ja Euroopa Parlamendile aruande selle kohta, kas olukord ühises miinimumnimekirjas olevas riigis on endiselt kooskõlas II lisaga.
Upon request by the Council or the European Parliament , the Commission shall report to the Council and the European Parliament on whether the situation of a country on the minimum common list is still in conformity with Annex II.
Artikli 30A lõige 2
Article 30A, paragraph 2
Erandina lõikest 1 võivad liikmesriigid käesoleva direktiivi vastuvõtmise ajal säilitada kehtivad õigusaktid, mis võimaldavad määratleda kolmandad riigid, mida varjupaigataotluste läbivaatamise eesmärgil peetakse turvalisteks päritoluriikideks, kuid mis ei ole ühises miinimumnimekirjas, kui liikmesriigid on veendunud, et isikuid asjaomastes kolmandates riikides ei:
By derogation to paragraph 1, Member States may retain legislation in force at the time of adoption of this Directive that allows for the national designation of third countries, other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum where they are satisfied that persons in the third countries concerned are neither subject to:
b) piinata, kohelda ebainimlikult või inimväärikust alandavalt ega karistata.
(b) torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment .
b) piinata, kohelda ebainimlikult või inimväärikust alandavalt ega karistata ega
(b) torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; nor
c) diskrimineerita mistahes kujul usutunnistuse, etnilise päritolu, poliitiliste tõekspidamiste, rassi või soo alusel.
c) discrimination in any form on the basis of religion, ethnic origin, political belief, race or sex.
It should be stated for certain, and not 'generally', that third country nationals will not suffer any of these treatments should their application be rejected.
It should be stated for certain, and not 'generally', that third country nationals will not suffer any of these treatments should their application be rejected.
Artikli 35A lõige 3
Article 35A, paragraph 3
Nõukogu võib komisjoni ettepaneku põhjal ja pärast konsulteerimist Euroopa Parlamendiga võtta vastu või muuta kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega ühist nimekirja kolmandatest riikidest, mida peetakse lõike 1 kohaldamisel turvalisteks kolmandateks riikideks.
The Council shall, acting by qualified majority on the proposal of the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament , adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Nõukogu võib vastavalt EÜ asutamislepingu artiklis 251 sätestatud menetluskorrale võtta vastu või muuta ühist nimekirja kolmandatest riikidest, mida peetakse lõike 1 kohaldamisel turvalisteks kolmandateks riikideks.
The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the EC Treaty , adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Nimetatud maksimaalse neljanädalase ajavahemiku jooksul on varjupaigataotlejal õigus suhelda oma perekonnaliikmete ja oma õiguslike esindajatega ning saada vajalikku toetust ja abi.
During this maximum four ‑week period, the applicant for asylum shall have the right to communicate with members of his/her family and with his/her legal representatives and to receive the necessary support and assistance.
Muudetud ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu direktiiv liikmesriikides pagulasseisundi omistamise ja äravõtmise menetluse miinimumnõuete kohta
Amended proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
Margrete Auken, Alessandro Battilocchio, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Nirj Deva, Michael Gahler, Jana Hyb?škov?, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Glenys Kinnock, Girts Valdis Kristovskis, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Luisa Morgantini, Toomas Savi, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, Anna Záborská, Jan Zahradil, Mauro Zani
Margrete Auken, Alessandro Battilocchio, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Nirj Deva, Michael Gahler, Jana Hybášková, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Glenys Kinnock, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Luisa Morgantini, Toomas Savi, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, Anna Záborská, Jan Zahradil, Mauro Zani
I. Summary of the proposal
I. Summary of the proposal
(5) Käesoleva direktiivi peaeesmärk on kehtestada Euroopa Ühenduses miinimumraamistik pagulasseisundi omistamise ja äravõtmise menetluste kohta, vastavalt rahvusvahelistele standarditele, eriti pagulaste seisundit käsitlevale 1951. aasta Genfi konventsioonile ning Tampere varjupaiga-alastele lõppjäreldustele.
(5) The main objective of this Directive is to introduce a minimum framework in the European Community on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status , keeping in line with international standards, in particular the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees and the Tampere conclusions on asylum.
(8) Käesolevas direktiivis austatakse põhiõigusi ja peetakse kinni iseäranis Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartaga tunnustatud põhimõtetest ning kõikidest olemasolevatest rahvusvahelistest kohustustest, eriti 1951. a Genfi konventsioonist .
(8) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , and by international obligations, in particular the 1951 Geneva Convention.
Lisaks sellele peaks varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise menetlus üldjuhul andma taotlejale vähemalt õiguse jääda riiki, kuni menetlev asutus teeb otsuse; õiguse kasutada tõlgi teenuseid oma juhtumi esitamisel, kui asutused teda küsitlevad; võimaluse suhelda oma nimel ÜRO pagulaste ülemkomissari esindajaga või tema nimel tegutsevate organisatsioonidega; õiguse saada kohaselt teada otsusest, selle faktilisest ja juriidilisest põhjendusest; võimaluse konsulteerida õigusnõustajaga või muu nõustajaga; ning õiguse saada informatsiooni oma juriidilise staatuse kohta menetluse otsustavatel hetkedel keeles, mille puhul on põhjust oletada, et ta sellest aru saab .
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should normally provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can reasonably be supposed to understand.
(13) Genfi konventsiooni artikli 1 tähenduses pagulastena kaitset vajavate isikute nõuetekohase tunnustamise huvides peaks igal taotlejal olema teatavate eranditega juurdepääs menetlusele, võimalus teha koostööd ja nõuetekohaselt suhelda pädevate asutustega, et esitada oma juhtumi kohta asjassepuutuvaid fakte, ning protseduurilised tagatised oma juhtumi jätkuvaks menetlemiseks kõikides etappides.
(13) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, subject to certain exceptions, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to co-operate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case at and throughout all stages of the procedure.
Lisaks sellele peaks varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise menetlus andma taotlejale vähemalt õiguse jääda riiki, kuni menetlev asutus teeb otsuse; õiguse kasutada tõlgi teenuseid oma juhtumi esitamisel, kui asutused teda küsitlevad; võimaluse suhelda oma nimel ÜRO pagulaste ülemkomissari esindajaga või tema nimel tegutsevate organisatsioonidega; õiguse saada kohaselt teada otsusest, selle faktilisest ja juriidilisest põhjendusest; võimaluse konsulteerida õigusnõustajaga või muu nõustajaga; ning õiguse saada informatsiooni oma juriidilise staatuse kohta menetluse otsustavatel hetkedel keeles, millest ta aru saab .
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can understand.
Antud kontekstis peaksid liikmesriigid kooskõlas lapse õiguse konventsiooni artikliga 3 kogu varjupaigataotluse menetluse jooksul seadma esikohale lapse parimad huvid.
In this context, the best interests of the child should be the primary consideration of Member States throughout the whole asylum procedure, consistent with Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) .
Pidades silmas turvaliste päritoluriikide määratlemise poliitilist tähtsust, arvestades eelkõige päritoluriigi inimõiguste olukorra hinnangu mõjusid ja selle mõjusid Euroopa Liidu välispoliitikale, peaks nõukogu mis tahes otsused nimekirja koostamise või muutmise kohta tegema pärast konsulteerimist Euroopa Parlamendiga.
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list, after consultation of the European Parliament.
Pidades silmas turvaliste päritoluriikide määratlemise poliitilist tähtsust, arvestades eelkõige päritoluriigi inimõiguste olukorra hinnangu mõjusid ja selle mõjusid Euroopa Liidu välispoliitikale, peaks nõukogu mis tahes otsused nimekirja koostamise või muutmise kohta tegema vastavalt asutamislepingu artiklile 251.
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list pursuant to Article 251 of the Treaty.