natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Loodan, et saame aasta lõpuks otsad kokku tõmmata, sest see on meie ühine vastutus alustamaks 1. jaanuaril korraliku finantskeemiga.
However, Parliament's negotiating team has already expressed the hope that the leaders of the member states will break the deadlock at their meeting in December, in time for the budget to be formally approved before year-end.
Institutsioonidevahelised pinged ja mängud ei tohiks kunagi olulisemad olla kui asi ise - programmid.
As EP general budget rapporteur and Polish MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska (EPP) pointed out after the meeting, "there is a growing discrepancy between what the Member States expect the EU to do and the willingness of the Member States to finance those new tasks".
Sidonia Jędrzejewska Pressiteade
Press release EP Press conference following Monday's meeting Press conference, Council and Commission EuroparlTV Budget Q&A
Eelarvekomisjon hääletas 2011. eelarve üle
The 2011 Budget: going for growth
Komisjoni eelarve ettepanek, nõukogu positsioon, parlamendi eelarve komisjoni ettepanek 2011 on aasta, mil majandus teeb tõenäoliselt sammu suure elavnemise suunas ja ELi eelarve on selles osas üks oluline vahend.
Next year is the year the economy could make a decisive step in its recovery and the EU budget is one vital instrument in this path to redemption for post-crisis Europe.
Samas muutsid nii nõukogu ja nüüd ka parlament tugevalt komisjoni esialgseid eelarve ettepanekuid ning pärast esimest hääletust eelarvekomisjonis võitleb parlament selle eest, et viia rahastamine vastuvõetavale tasemele.
However, the initial budget proposals by the Commission were severely trimmed by the Council of Ministers and now Parliament, following the first vote in the Budgets Committee, is fighting to restore funding to more acceptable levels.
Eelarvekomisjon töötas terve nädala, et jätkata rahastamist sama tõhusalt kui Euroopa Komisjon algselt ette pani - parlamendikomisjoni meelest peaks eelarve olema 3,5 miljardit kõrgem kui nõudis nõukogu.
However, the Budgets Committee, in a procedure that lasted an entire week, has voted to restore funding to effectively the same level as initially proposed by the European Commission, a figure 3,5 billion euros higher than demanded by the Ministers in the Council.
Tegu on väikese kasvuga võrreldes 2010. aastaga ja on lähedal komisjoni esialgsele ettepanekule.
This represents a slight increase above 2010 levels and is close to the original Commission proposal, with MEPs striving to strike the right balance between the obvious need for economies and the equally obvious need to sufficiently fund EU action.
EP raportöör eelarve küsimuses Sidonia Jędrzejewska, poola konservatiiv, selgitas: "Olen teadlik, et majanduskriisi ajal peame tegema kärpeid ja soodustusi, kuid me ei saa unustada, et meie tulevane majanduskasv sõltub tänastest investeeringutest, eelkõige hariduse, teaduse ning innovatsiooni valdkondades."
Pointing out at the needs of the moment, the EP rapporteur for the budget, Polish centre right MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska, explained during last week's debate that "I am aware that in the times of economic crisis we have to make cuts and concessions, but we cannot forget that our future economic growth will depend on today’s investments, especially in the area of education, research an innovation".
Komisjonis 27. aprillil 2010 vastu võetud ELi 2011. aasta eelarveprojekti peamised prioriteedid on majanduse elavdamine, investeeringud Euroopa noortesse ja tuleviku infrastruktuuridesse.
The draft 2011 budget presented by the Commission in April foresees 142.56 billion euros or 1.13% of EU GNI in commitments and 130.13 billion or 1,06% of EU GNI in actual payments.
Lisaks on ELi 2020. aasta tööhõive ja majanduskasvu strateegia suurprojektide toetamiseks ette nähtud 57,9 miljardit eurot, mis moodustab eelarvest ligikaudu 40%.
However, the Council in August only agreed to an overall budget of 141.77 billion in commitments and 126,53 billion in payments, trimming more than 3,5 billion euros from the EC proposal, especially funds for Europe's poorer regions, for agriculture and for international aid.
Lamassoure: 2011. aasta eelarve toetab majandustegevust
2011: A budget for today and tomorrow
EP eelarvekomisjoni juht Alain Lamassoure Järgmisel nädalal hääletab EP ELi 2011. aasta eelarve projekti üle, pärast seda, kui eelarvekomisjon on suurendanud eelarvenumbrid samale tasemele, mis komisjon algselt ette pani.
Frenchman Alain Lamassoure (EPP) who heads Parliament's powerful Budget Committee The EP is set to vote next week (15-22 October) on its version of the EU 2011 draft budget, with the Budgets Committee having already restored most of the funding originally proposed by the Commission but subsequently cut by the governments in Council.
EP eelarvekomisjoni juht Alain Lamassoure, prantsuse konservatiiv, seletas meile, mis on läbirääkimiste keerulised punktid ning mida tuleva nädala hääletuselt oodata.
Why has the EP insisted in restoring the spending, what are its red lines in the negotiations with the Council that are expected to follow next week's vote and how should the budget be financed in the future?
Eelarvekomisjon taastas oma hääletusel enamiku nõukogu tehtud kärbetest 2011. aasta eelarve projekti osas.
Mr Lamassoure, the Budgets Committee has voted to restore most of the cuts made to the 2011 draft budget by the Council of ministers.
Euroopa tasandil on samad raskused ja dilemmad, mis riiklikul tasandil.
We are at European level are in the same difficulties, the same dilemmas as at the national level.
Eelarve osas peab ühest küljest kokku hoidma, samas säilitama tulevaste kulutuste taseme: kulutused teadusuuringutele, haridusele, innovatsioonile, sotsiaalraha inimestele, kes kaotanud oma töökoha ning püüavad uut leida.
It takes time to make budget savings but at the same time preserve future spending: spending on research, education, innovation and social spending for workers who lost their jobs and who are trying to retrain.
Iga riik püüab leida hea tasakaalu nende kahe vahel, kuigi alguses võib tunduda see veidi vastuoluline.
Each State is trying to find a good balance between these two concerns, which may seem a bit contradictory.
Kuna halduskulude osakaal ELi eelarvest on vaid 6%, siis on Euroopa Parlament veendunud, et ELi eelarve on majandusliku tegevuse ettevalmistamise ja toetamise eelarve, toetades eelkõige majanduse elavdamist.
The European Parliament insists that the EU budget is essentially a budget of economic action, preparing and supporting future income and thus supports the request to help support the recovery and so the budget contains only 6% in administrative expenses.
See eelarve toetabki majandustegevust, mistõttu me Euroopa Parlamendis usume, et me ei peaks ohverdama liiga palju Euroopa poliitikatest, sest see oleks vastuolus meie taotletud eesmärkidega.
This budget supports economic activity, so the European Parliament believes that we should not sacrifice too many European policies which would be contrary to the objective sought by us all.
Arvan, et punane joon ei peitu 2011. aasta eelarves.
I think the main red line is not on the 2011 budget.
Liikmesriigid, kes rahastavad Euroopa Liidu eelarvet on sel aastal panuseid väga vähe suurendanud.
We know that the member states who finance the EU budget have barely increased their contributions this year.
Aga valitsused peavad nõustuma, et sellise kriisi ajal tuleb säilitada kulutuste nivoo alates 2012. aastast.
But governments must accept that it takes this time of crisis to agree to preserve future expenditures from 2012.
Juba on tunda majanduse elavnemist.
The economic recovery is being felt in 2010.
Need on poliitikad, milleks meil on vaja ressursse.
The contributors are national budgets that are ruined.
On aeg mõelda uute omavahendite peale, mida saab toita riigieelarveid koormamata otse ELi eelarvest.
It is time to reflect on new own resources that can feed directly into the EU budget without burdening the national budget.
Kas valitsused nõustuvad sellega?
Will governments be able to accept this?
Praegu ei.
Not at the moment.
Aga mõttetalgud pole veel alanud - tegu on algusega.
But thinking has not yet begun, it is really just beginning.
Loodan, et nad nõustuvad aasta lõpuks.
I hope they will accept it by the end of the year.
EP teeb 2011. aastaks mõõduka eelarveettepaneku, ent soovib kõneleda tulevikust
2011 budget: The EP position
2011. aasta eelarve Saadikud soovivad suurendada investeeringuid teadusuuringutesse, innovatsiooni, haridusse ja energiasse ning eraldada rohkem vahendeid Palestiinale, ent samas ei suurenda nad märkimisväärselt üldist kulutuste taset.
Budget 2011 A more restrictive 2011 budget which will, however, allow the EU to overcome the crisis through investment in research, education and "green" energy, while safeguarding future spending, was voted by MEP on Wednesday 20 October.
Lisaks soovivad parlamendiliikmed Lissaboni lepingust tulenevalt alustada kõnelusi praeguse pikaajalise eelarveraamistiku ning uute rahastamisallikate osas.
With the vote, the stage is set for the tough negotiations with the Council leading to the final vote in the November plenary.
P arlament teeb ettepaneku suurendada 2011. aasta eelarvet 2010. aasta eelarvega võrreldes 0,8%.
Recognising the budgetary constraints faced by most member states, Parliament voted on Wednesday 20 October for just a 0,8% increase in commitments compared to 2010.
Saadikud mõistavad, et liikmesriikide eelarved on terava surve all ning seetõttu ei taotle nad Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekust märkimisväärselt suuremat eelarvet.
However, it rejected the Council's proposed spending mix and set different priorities, pointing out that "arbitrary reductions" are "not in line with sound budgeting".
Parlamendiliikmete ettepanek maksete assigneeringuteks on 130,56 miljardit eurot ning kulukohustuste assigneeringuteks 143,07 miljardit eurot.
He asked however, whether it is "reasonable" to expect that the EUs new policies, competences and strategies, all decided by the governments, will be carried out without "a single extra euro".
Euroopa Komisjon pakkus vastavalt 130,14 miljardit ja 142,56 miljardit eurot.
In all Parliament voted for funding of approximately 130.56 billion euros in payments and 143.07 billion in commitments, or 1.14% of EU GNI, in line with what the Commission had originally proposed but still lower than originally envisaged by the 2007-2013 long term financial framework.
Parlament "mõistab muret, mida mõned delegatsioonid väljendasid nõukogus selle kohta, et liikmesriikide eelarvetele avalduv surve on 2011. aastal eriti suur ja kokkuhoid on seda vajalikum," ütlevad saadikud vastu võetud resolutsioonis.
In major departures from the Council's position, the EP increased funding for lifelong learning, innovation and "intelligent" energy, the Baltic Sea strategy, restored funding for agriculture, youth, sport and programmes against domestic violence, as well as assistance to the Palestinians.
Seetõttu ei toeta saadikud nõukogu poolt välja pakutud kärpeid.
Commitments: The maximum amounts available for all actions and programmes scheduled to start during the year.
Olulisemad eelarve suurendamised ning kärped
May be disbursed over several years
Lisaks võttis parlament vastu näiteks järgmised eelarve muudatused:
Sidonia Jędrzejewska: "we are not blind to the concerns of the member states"
1a Konkurentsivõime - saadikud soovivad lisaraha elukestva õppe jaoks (+18 miljonit eurot), ettevõtluse ja uuendustegevuse programmi jaoks (+10 miljonit eurot) ning Euroopa aruka energeetika programmi jaoks (+10 miljonit eurot).
Centre right Polish MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska (EPP) is the EPs general rapporteur on the 2011 Budget The approval process for the European Union's 2011 budget is entering its most decisive phase, the negotiations between Parliament and the member states on the exact amounts to be spent during the year, amid ongoing discussions on the future funding of the budget.
Vastukaaluks kärpisid saadikud tuumasünteesienergeetika programmi 47 miljoni euro võrra.
Centre right Polish MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska is has been guiding Parliament through the process and agreed to answer our questions.
1b Ühtekuuluvus - saadikud lisasid eelarverea Läänemere strateegia jaoks ja soovivad eraldada selleks veel 2,5 miljonit eurot.
Parliament's budget figures are well within the multiannual framework and in line with Commission proposals, but have been attacked as excessive at a time when there are cuts in many member states.
2 Loodusressursid - Life+ programmile soovitakse eraldada +6,7 miljonit eurot ning kalavarude majandamise toetamiseks +2 miljonit eurot
What is the real difference with what the Council proposed and why was it necessary?
3a Justiits- ja siseküsimused - Daphne programmile tahetakse anda +2,35 miljonit eurot ning terrorismi ennetamiseks +1 miljonit eurot.
Indeed the European Parliament's position adopted last week is within the limits set by the multiannual financial framework.
3b Kodakondsus - Ülemaailmsele eriolümpiale Ateenas soovitakse eraldada +4 miljonit eurot ning programmile "Aktiivsed noored" +3 miljonit eurot.
This is worth underlining because it is new.
Kõik summad on kulukohustuste assigneeringud.
One is that in 2006, under the British presidency of the EU, we agreed on several multiannual programmes and we should not forget these decisions.
Pikaajaline eelarve tuleb kiiremas korras läbi vaadata
Not to respect them puts ongoing programmes at risk.
Resolutsioonis märgitakse, et mitmeaastases finantsraamistikus (finantsperspektiiv) sätestatud varud ei jäta tegelikku liikumisruumi.
The second thing is that many political events have taken place over the last years.
Saadikud nõuavad, et "ELile tagatakse piisaval tasemel kulutused" ning et "Euroopa Parlament kaasatakse nõuetekohaselt mitmeaastast finantsraamistikku / institutsioonidevahelist kokkulepet käsitlevatesse institutsioonidevahelistesse läbirääkimistesse".
The EU is under enormous pressure to implement space policy, to introduce European diplomacy, to meet its commitments linked to the EU 2020 strategy and we just don’t have resources for this.
Läbirääkimised uute rahastamisallikate üle
What the Council proposed in August is a de facto cut, when we need more.
Parlament soovib lisaks alustada läbirääkimisi eelarve uute rahastamisallikate üle, sh võimalus kanda kasutamata jäänud vahendid üle tulevastesse eelarvetesse, selle asemel, et need liikmesriikidele tagasi anda.
To be honest, the Council should either drop some of its priorities or be willing to go for an increase, which is by the way only a small one.
Eesmärk on veel sel aastal alustada läbirääkimisi selle osas, millised peaks rahastamisallikad olema pärast 2011. aastat.
The EU budget is usually compared to national budgets but is the comparison realistic, given the EU budget's mission and composition?
Stabiilsusmehhanismi sätted
They are totally different things.
Hetkel on need eelarveread veel tühjad.
It is also investment oriented.
Järgmised sammud
Is the time ripe to re-examine budget funding?
27. oktoobril algab parlamendi ja nõukogu vaheline lepitusprotsess, mis kestab 21 päeva ja mille eesmärk on jõuda ühise tekstini.
We have two months ahead of us and it is completely unrealistic to believe we can get to any conclusions on so controversial an issue.
Kui kompromiss saavutatakse, hääletatakse lõplikku eelarveettepanekut novembris.
Myself, I am not a fan of linking the debate on new financing mechanisms and the debate on the 2011 budget.
Kulukohustused ja maksed
On 2011 we need pragmatism and goodwill to conclude.
Iga eelarverea jaoks on kahte liiki assigneeringud - kulukohustuste ja maksete assigneeringud.
We have a number of amendments on the expenditure side that are a signal to the member states that they are giving more and more tasks to the EU but are unwilling to shift money to the EU level to implement those tasks.
Kulukohustused ütlevad, kui palju kohutustusi (nt lepingu sõlmimine või pakkumise algatamine) EL endale vastaval aastal tohib võtta.
I think this is a political problem we have to tackle, a form of political hypocrisy.
Maksete assigneeringud määravad vastaval aastal reaalselt tehtavate maksete piirid.
The final phase, conciliation between the Parliament and Council, is about to begin.
ELi eelarve KKK (inglise keeles) Vastu võetud tekstid leiate alates 21. oktoobrist siit (klikata 20. oktoobril 2010)
Do you fear deadlock in the negotiations?
Kõige lihtsamal kujul saab ELi eelarvet vaadelda nii, kui jaotada see seitsmeks osaks Kõige lihtsamal kujul saab ELi eelarvet vaadelda nii, kui jaotada see seitsmeks osaks.
But if the Council is completely unwilling to give more, it has to forget about some of its dreams like the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) or foreign policy.
Mitmeaastane raamprogramm seab ELi meetmetele piirid ja üldised eesmärgid.
The multiannual framework sets the limits and general targets for EU action.
Aasta eelarve katab iga kuluartiklit alates pastapliiatsitest ametnikele, toetustest ELi põllumajandustootjatele kuni majanduslikult vähem arenenud piirkondade aitamiseni.
The annual budget covers every single item of expenditure, from pencils for administrators, to subsidies for EU farmers and help for its economically less-developed regions.
Veelgi olulisem on, et see ei ole Euroopa luksus - see on aastakümneid olnud Euroopa majanduse lahutamatu osa ja tõeline jõudude kordaja, mis suurendab kogu ELi jõukust ja tõhusust.
More importantly, it is not a luxury for Europe: it is and has been for decades, an integral part of the European economy, a true force multiplier that increases the whole Union's wealth and effectiveness.
Igal aastal kulutavad kodanikud ELi nimel peaaegu 1% ELi rahvamajanduse kogutulust (RKT), mis tähendab umbes 130 miljardit eurot.
In all, every year the EU spends on behalf of the citizens almost exactly 1% of the EU Gross National Income (GNI) or about €130 billion.
See tähendab umbes 235 eurot iga ELi kodaniku kohta aastas.
This translates into about €235 from each EU citizen per year.
Praegusest finantsraamistikust tehakse peagi vahekokkuvõte.
The current financial framework is about to undergo a mid-term review.
Euroopa Komisjon esitab oma ettepanekud 19. oktoobril, kuid juba 22. septembril palus parlament palju suuremat paindlikkust vahendite kasutamisel, et paremini sobitada võimalused ja vajadused, samuti selleks, et teha eelarvesse suuremad rahalised marginaalid, et olla valmis erinevateks olukordadeks tulevikus.
The European Commission will be presenting its proposals on 19 October, but on 22 September Parliament called for far greater flexibility in handling the funds, in order to better match capabilities and needs, as well as for greater financial margins to be built into the budget to allow for future contingencies
Raha voolab eelarvesse nn omavahenditest, mis kogutakse liikmesriikides ja seejärel kantakse üle ELi eelarvesse.
The revenue - money flowing into the budget - comes from "own resources", which are generally collected by the member states and then transferred to the EU budget.
Omavahenditel on kolm liiki:
They are:
"Traditsioonilised omavahendid" tollimaksudest vastavalt kaupadele, mis on imporditud riikidest väljaspool ELi ja suhkru lõivudest.
"Traditional own resources" from customs duties and sugar levies - money collected when goods are imported from outside the EU and when sugar is exported from the EU to other countries.
See moodustab umbes 12% tuludest.
This accounts for about 12% of revenue.
"Käibemaksu-omavahendid" on osa laekuvast käibemaksutulust liikmesriikides.
The "VAT resource" is a proportion of VAT revenue collected by the Member States, representing 11% of the EU budget revenue.
Moodustab 11% ELi eelarvetuludest.
The "GNI resource" is an annual direct contribution by each member state according to its wealth, as measured by its GNI.
"RKT allikad" - liikmesriikide iga-aastased otsesed panused vastavalt oma rikkusele, mõõdetuna tema RKTst (rahvuslik koguprodukt).
It accounts for 75% of all EU revenue and there are various fine tuning mechanisms, such as the UK rebate, which returns to the UK a percentage of what it has contributed to the budget.
Moodustab kolm neljandikku kõikidest ELi tuludest.
A review of these revenues is being discussed, though not yet formally negotiated.
Ülevaade nendest tuludest on tehtud ja neid parasjagu arutatakse (kuigi mitte veel ametlikult) ja üks ettepanek on asendada mõned või kõik need vahendid üldise ELi maksuga, mis tagab piisava eelarve rahastamise ilma lisakuludeta maksumaksjale.
One proposal is to replace some or all of these resources by an EU-wide tax that would ensure adequate financing for the budget without any additional cost to the taxpayer.
EL ei ole oma kulude katmiseks võimeline laenama.
There is therefore no public budgetary deficit (or surplus) at EU level.
Seega ei ole ELi tasandil avalikku eelarvedefitsiiti (või ülejääki). ... ja kulutused...
... and spending...
Kulude poolel domineerivad eelarves kaks valdkonda: (1) rahaline toetus Euroopa Liidu maapiirkondade ja põllumajandustootjatele ja (2) toetused vähem arenenud piirkondadele lõhe vähendamiseks rikaste ja vaeste vahel.
There are two big areas of expenditure: (i) financial support for the Union's rural regions and the farmers that bring them to life and (ii) support for the less developed regions to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
2007-2013 raamistikus on kulutuste osas kuus peamist "rubriiki", mis on jagatud lugematuteks "eelarve objektideks".
The 2007-2013 framework includes six main "headings" for spending, subdivided into innumerable budget "items", each covering specific expenditure authorised by specific legislation, and into "commitments" and the slightly lower "payments", the money actually disbursed.
Kokku on ELi kulutusi kuni umbes 925 miljardit eurot seitsme aasta jooksul või siis peaaegu täpselt 1% ELi RKTst.
EU expenditure adds up to about €925 billion for the seven years or almost exactly 1% of EU GNI.
Protsess on üksikasjalikult sätestatud ELi lepingutes ja Euroopa parlamendi, nõukogu ja komisjoni kokkuleppes.
After the multiannual framework is set, the exact amounts to be spent every year by the EU are decided in, often, tough negotiations between Parliament and Council, a process set out in detail by the EU Treaties and an inter-institutional agreement between Parliament, Council and Commission.
Lissaboni leping, mis on alates käesoleva aasta algusest ELi peamine reegliraamat, on protsessi demokraatlikku kontrolli oluliselt täiustanud ja parandanud, samuti suurendanud Euroopa Parlamendi rolli, muutes viimase täiesti pädevaks, sealhulgas valdkondades nagu põllumajandus ja välissuhted.
The Lisbon Treaty has streamlined the process and improved democratic scrutiny by substantially enhancing the role of the European Parliament in the process, extending its powers to agriculture and foreign relations.
Pärast institutsioonide vaheliste läbirääkimiste esimest vooru aasta alguses lepitakse kokku peamistes prioriteetides, misjärel Euroopa Komisjon esitab oma ettepaneku või eelnõu aprillis või mai alguses.
After a first round of talks between institutions early in the year to agree on the main priorities, the European Commission presents its proposal, or draft budget, at the and of April or beginning of May.
Nõukogu esitab oma versiooni eelarveprojektist enne suve lõppu.
Council presents its own version of the draft budget before the end of the summer.
Nõukogu versiooni eelarvest vaatab läbi Euroopa Parlamendi eelarvekomisjon.
Council's version of the budget is examined by the Parliament's Budgets Committee.
Pärast konsultatsioone teiste spetsialiseerunud komisjonidega võtab eelarvekomisjon oktoobri alguses vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi prioriteetidele vastu muudatused nõukogu arvude osas.
After a process of consultation with other committees specialising in various policy areas, in early October the Budgets Committee adopts amendments to the Council's figures based on Parliament's priorities.
Eelarveprojekti parandatud versioon läheb terve parlamendi ees hääletusele oktoobri istungil.
The revised version of the draft budget is put to Parliament as a whole for adoption during its October sitting.