natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Raudtee-ettevõtjate esmane prioriteet on ühenduste tagamine ja veoteenuste tühistamise vältimine kõikide olemasolevate vahenditega.
The first priority for railway undertakings shall be to ensure connections and avoid cancellations with all available means.
The railway service itself, i.e. ensuring connections and avoiding cancellations, should be prior in passengers' rights ("Beförderungspflicht").
The railway service itself, i.e. ensuring connections and avoiding cancellations, should be prior in passengers' rights ("Beförderungspflicht").
Juhul kui hilinemisega kaasneb ühendusreisist mahajäämine või juhul kui rahvusvaheline veoteenus tühistatakse, kohaldatakse lõiget 2, välja arvatud siis, kui raudtee-ettevõtja suudab tõestada, et veoteenus tühistati vaid erandlike asjaolude tõttu.
In the case of a delay leading to a missed connection or a cancellation of an international service, paragraph 2 shall apply, except when the railway undertaking can prove that the service was cancelled solely because of exceptional circumstances.
Juhul kui hilinemisega , sealhulgas raudtee-ettevõtja poolt puudega inimese abistamise hilinemisega, kaasneb ühendusreisist mahajäämine või juhul kui veoteenus tühistatakse, kohaldatakse lõiget 2, välja arvatud siis, kui raudtee-ettevõtja suudab tõestada, et veoteenus hilines või tühistati vaid erandlike asjaolude tõttu.
In the case of a delay, including a delay in the provision of assistance to a person with reduced mobility by the railway undertaking, leading to a missed connection or a cancellation of a service, paragraph 2 shall apply, except when the railway undertaking can prove that the service was delayed or cancelled solely because of exceptional circumstances.
Artikli 16 lõike 2 esimene lõik
Article 16, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1
Juhul kui raudtee-ettevõtjat tabab hilinemine, millega kaasneb ühendusreisist mahajäämine, või kui raudtee-ettevõtja enne plaanipärast väljumisaega tühistab või arvab, et ta tõenäoliselt tühistab mõne rahvusvahelise raudteeveoteenuse, teeb ta kõik võimaliku, et reisijaid sellest teavitada.
When , a railway undertaking is facing a delay that will lead to a missed connection or when, before the scheduled time of departure, a railway undertaking cancels or reasonably expects to cancel an international railway service, it shall make every effort to inform the passengers.
Juhul kui raudtee-ettevõtja tabab hilinemine, millega kaasneb ühendusreisist mahajäämine või kui raudtee-ettevõtja enne plaanipärast väljumisaega tühistab või arvab, et ta tõenäoliselt tühistab mõne raudteeveoteenuse, teeb ta kõik võimaliku, et reisijaid sellest teavitada ning tagada sihtkohta jõudmine .
When a railway undertaking is facing a delay that will lead to a missed connection or when, before the scheduled time of departure, a railway undertaking cancels or reasonably expects to cancel a railway service, it shall make every effort to inform the passengers and to ensure that the final destination can be reached .
Irrespective of the cause of the delay, railway undertakings must do everything possible to inform passengers and to enable them to reach their final destination.
Irrespective of the cause of the delay, railway undertakings must do everything possible to inform passengers and to enable them to reach their final destination.
If the journey can be undertaken by another route, using the trains of another railway company, this must not constitute an obstacle..
If the journey can be undertaken by another route, using the trains of another railway company, this must not constitute an obstacle..
Artikli 16 lõike 2 teise lõigu punkt a
Article 16, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, point (a)
a) pileti maksumuse täieulatuslik tagasimakse vastavalt selle maksmise tingimustele reisi selle osa või osade eest, mida ei läbitud, ning nende osade eest, mis juba on läbitud, juhul kui rahvusvaheline reis on muutunud mõttetuks reisija algse reisikava suhtes, vajadusel koos tagasisõidu teenusega esimese lähtekohani selleks avaneval esimesel võimalusel.
(a) reimbursement of the full cost of the ticket, under the conditions by which it was paid, for the part or parts of their journey not made and for the part or parts already made if the international journey is no longer serving any purpose in relation to the passenger’s original travel plan, together with, when relevant, a return service to the first point of departure at the earliest opportunity.
Tagasimakse toimub samadel tingimustel kui artikli 15 lõikes 2 või 3 nimetatud hüvitise maksmise korral; või
The payment of the reimbursement shall be made under the same conditions as the payment for compensation referred to in Article 15 (2) or (3); or
a) pileti maksumuse täieulatuslik tagasimakse vastavalt selle maksmise tingimustele reisi selle osa või osade eest, mida ei läbitud ning nende osade eest, mis juba on läbitud, juhul kui reis on muutunud mõttetuks reisija algse reisikava suhtes, vajadusel koos tagasisõiduga esimese lähtekohani selleks avaneval esimesel võimalusel.
(a) reimbursement of the full cost of the ticket, under the conditions by which it was paid, for the part or parts of their journey not made and for the part or parts already made if the journey is no longer serving any purpose in relation to the passenger’s original travel plan, together with, when relevant, a return service to the first point of departure at the earliest opportunity.
Artikli 16 lõike 2 teise lõigu punkt b
Article 16, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, point (b)
b) esimesel võimalusel reisi jätkamine või marsruudi muutmine sihtkohta jõudmiseks võrdväärsetel transporditingimustel; või
(b) continuation or re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to the final destination at the earliest opportunity; or
b) esimesel võimalusel reisi jätkamine või marsruudi muutmine sihtkohta jõudmiseks võrdväärsetel transporditingimustel, tagades võrdväärse juurdepääsutaseme ja kasutades vajadusel kallimaid ronge ilma lisatasuta ; või
(b) continuation or re-routing, under comparable transport conditions granting an equivalent degree of accessibility , to the final destination at the earliest opportunity, possibly using more expensive trains without extra costs ; or
Comparable transport conditions must be interpreted to ensure an equivalent degree of accessibility.
Comparable transport conditions must be interpreted to ensure an equivalent degree of accessibility.
For example, if a wheelchair accessible journey is cancelled and the next train ("the earliest opportunity") is not wheelchair accessible, a passenger with a disability should not be required to accept the inaccessible train as the alternative journey.
For example, if a wheelchair accessible journey is cancelled and the next train ("the earliest opportunity") is not wheelchair accessible, a passenger with a disability should not be required to accept the inaccessible train as the alternative journey.
Artikli 16 lõike 2 teise lõigu punkt c
Article 16, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, point (c)
c) reisi jätkamine või marsruudi muutmine sihtkohta jõudmiseks võrdväärsetel transporditingimustel hilisemal kuupäeval vastavalt reisija soovile .
(c) continuation or re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to the final destination at a later date at the passenger's convenience .
c) reisi jätkamine või marsruudi muutmine sihtkohta jõudmiseks võrdväärsetel transporditingimustel hilisemal kuupäeval.
(c) continuation or re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to the final destination at a later date.
The force majeure clause should be reconsidered in relation to the right to choose whether to continue the journey or abandon it and obtain a refund of the fare in the event of a delay resulting in a missed connection or in the event of the cancellation or anticipated cancellation of a train.
The force majeure clause should be reconsidered in relation to the right to choose whether to continue the journey or abandon it and obtain a refund of the fare in the event of a delay resulting in a missed connection or in the event of the cancellation or anticipated cancellation of a train.
No matter what the reason for undertaking the journey, it might be pointless from the passenger's point of view to undertake the journey at a later time, for example if he had intended to keep an appointment which he then missed.
No matter what the reason for undertaking the journey, it might be pointless from the passenger's point of view to undertake the journey at a later time, for example if he had intended to keep an appointment which he then missed.
Moreover, it goes without saying that, whenever a transport undertaking is unable to provide a service, the fare for that service must be refunded.
Moreover, it goes without saying that, whenever a transport undertaking is unable to provide a service, the fare for that service must be refunded.
The risk of force majeure always rests with the undertaking in such cases (i.e. in other sectors too).
The risk of force majeure always rests with the undertaking in such cases (i.e. in other sectors too).
Railway undertakings should not, therefore, be able to invoke force majeure in respect of these passenger rights.
Railway undertakings should not, therefore, be able to invoke force majeure in respect of these passenger rights.
Artikli 17 lõike 2 punkt a
Article 17, paragraph 2, point (a)
a) einet ja karastusjooke ootamisajale vastaval hulgal ; ja/või
(a) meals and refreshments in a reasonable relation to the waiting time; and/or
a) võimalusel einet ja karastusjooke; ja/või
(a) meals and refreshments where possible; and/or
The amendments proposed to paragraphs(a) and (b) of this Article are aligned with European Railway Undertakings' own Charter commitment to meet these circumstances, which provide sufficient assistance for passengers' reasonable needs.
The amendments proposed to paragraphs(a) and (b) of this Article are aligned with European Railway Undertakings' own Charter commitment to meet these circumstances, which provide sufficient assistance for passengers' reasonable needs.
It should be noted that the Railway Undertakings acknowledge the need to look after their customers' safety and comfort (i.e. paragraphs (a);(b) and (c) when things go wrong even if the Railway Undertaking is not liable according to Article 11a(2)).
It should be noted that the Railway Undertakings acknowledge the need to look after their customers' safety and comfort (i.e. paragraphs (a);(b) and (c) when things go wrong even if the Railway Undertaking is not liable according to Article 11a(2)).
However the term "where possible" is necessary because there may be circumstances where the Railway Undertaking is prevented from delivering on this commitment.
However the term "where possible" is necessary because there may be circumstances where the Railway Undertaking is prevented from delivering on this commitment.
For example, many trains do not carry catering facilities and it is rarely possible to get supplies to a train away from a station, the more so if severe weather is the cause.
For example, many trains do not carry catering facilities and it is rarely possible to get supplies to a train away from a station, the more so if severe weather is the cause.
Artikli 17 lõike 2 punkt b
Article 17, paragraph 2, point (b)
b) hotellimajutust , kui on vajalik üks või mitu ööbimist või kui on vajalik lisaööbimine; ja/või
(b) hotel accommodation in cases where a stay of one or more nights becomes necessary or an additional stay becomes necessary; and/or
b) ööbimisvõimalust, välja arvatud juhul, kui see on antud tingimustes võimatu, kui on vajalik üks või mitu ööbimist või kui on vajalik lisaööbimine; ja/või
(b) overnight accommodation , unless this is not possible in the circumstances prevailing, in cases where a stay of one or more nights becomes necessary or an additional stay becomes necessary; and/or
However the words "unless this is not possible in the circumstances prevailing" are necessary because there may be circumstances where the Railway Undertaking is prevented from delivering on this commitment.
However the words "unless this is not possible in the circumstances prevailing" are necessary because there may be circumstances where the Railway Undertaking is prevented from delivering on this commitment.
Artikli 17 lõike 2 punkt c
Article 17, paragraph 2, point (c)
c) transporti raudteejaama ja majutuskoha (hotell või muu) vahel;
(c) transport between the railway station and place of accommodation (hotel or other).
c) transporti raudteejaama ja sellise majutuskoha (hotell või muu) vahel; või
(c) transport between the railway station and such place of accommodation (hotel or other); or
Artikli 17 lõike 2 punkt d
Article 17, paragraph 2, point (d)
d) transporti raudteejaama või rongi, kui see on teele jäänud, ja veoteenuse sihtkoha või alternatiivse transpordivahendi väljumiskoha vahel.
(d) transport between the railway station or the train if it is blocked on the track and the final destination of the service or the place of departure of an alternate transport means.
d) kui raudteeveoteenus lükatakse edasi määramata ajaks muul põhjusel kui artikli 11 a lõikes 2 toodud erandlikel asjaoludel, transporti asjaomase raudteejaama ja veoteenuse sihtkoha vahel alternatiivse transpordivahendiga .
(d) when the rail service is suspended indefinitely for a reason other than the exceptional circumstances identified in Article 11a(2), transport between the affected railway station and the final destination of the service by an alternate transport means.
The amendment to paragraph(d) is necessary to establish a workable set of alternatives in the railway system context.
The amendment to paragraph(d) is necessary to establish a workable set of alternatives in the railway system context.
Specific provisions for disembarking passengers from trains outside stations have safety implications and such circumstances should not be regulated by passenger rights legislation.
Specific provisions for disembarking passengers from trains outside stations have safety implications and such circumstances should not be regulated by passenger rights legislation.
Where the delay etc is due to reasons outside the control of Railway Undertakings, it is reasonable that they should not be obliged to provide alternative transport.
Where the delay etc is due to reasons outside the control of Railway Undertakings, it is reasonable that they should not be obliged to provide alternative transport.
Raudtee-ettevõtjad märgivad reisija soovil piletile, et raudteeveoteenus on hilinenud, sellega on kaasnenud ühendusreisist mahajäämine või on see tühistatud.
Railway undertakings shall, at the request of the passenger, certify on the ticket that the rail service has suffered a delay, lead to a missed connection or that it has been cancelled.
Kui raudtee-ettevõtja nõuab sellist tõendit, peab ta võtma vajalikud meetmed, et reisijad saaksid nimetatud tõendi lihtsalt ja kiiresti.
If a railway undertaking requires such certification, it must take the necessary measures to enable passengers to obtain it simply and quickly.
It is not clear how this certification is to take place or what procedures apply to it.
It is not clear how this certification is to take place or what procedures apply to it.
Should any railway official be able to issue a certificate?
Should any railway official be able to issue a certificate?
If not, would passengers have to choose between, for example, taking a subsequent train and taking time to contact a specific official to obtain a certificate?
If not, would passengers have to choose between, for example, taking a subsequent train and taking time to contact a specific official to obtain a certificate?
Railway companies which require such certification should be compelled to arrange for quick and easy certification.
Railway companies which require such certification should be compelled to arrange for quick and easy certification.
Artikli 17 lõige 4
Article 17, paragraph 4
Lõigete 1 ja 2 kohaldamisel osutab teenust pakkuv raudtee-ettevõtja erilist tähelepanu liikumispuudega reisijate ja neid saatvate isikute ning saatjata reisivate laste vajadustele.
In applying paragraphs 1 and 2, the operating railway undertaking shall pay particular attention to the needs of passengers with reduced mobility and any accompanying persons, as well as to the needs of unaccompanied children..
Lõigete 1 ja 2 kohaldamisel osutab teenust pakkuv raudtee-ettevõtja erilist tähelepanu liikumispuudega reisijate ja neid saatvate isikute ning saatjata reisivate laste vajadustele.
In applying paragraphs 1 and 2, the operating railway undertaking shall pay particular attention to the needs of passengers with reduced mobility and any accompanying persons, as well as to the needs of unaccompanied children.
Teave hilinemiste või tühistamiste, hotellimajutuse või alternatiivsete transpordivahendite, raha tagastamisskeemide, reisi jätkamise või marsruudi muutmise võimaluste kohta tuleb edastada kättesaadaval viisil.
Information regarding delays or cancellations, hotel accommodation or alternative transport arrangements, reimbursement schemes, continuation or re-routing options must be communicated in a manner that is accessible.
Liikumispuudega reisijatele raudtee-ettevõtja poolt korraldatud majutus või alternatiivne transport peab olema juurdepääsetav, samuti tuleb tagada asjakohane abi hilinemiste või tühistamiste korral.
Accommodation or alternate transport arranged for passengers with reduced mobility by the railway undertaking must be accessible and adequate assistance in cases of delay or cancellation must be provided.
Amendments to clarify the text.
Amendments to clarify the text.
The particular needs of passengers with disabilities in a situation of delay require a number of provisions.
The particular needs of passengers with disabilities in a situation of delay require a number of provisions.
Vastutust puudutavad sätted kehtivad ka, kui raudteesõidukeid transporditakse laevaga rahvusvahelise reisi osa(de)l, kuid ainult juhul, kui meretranspordi puhul kehtiv õiguskord ei ole reisijale soodsam .
The provisions relating to liability shall apply when railway vehicles are carried by ferry on part(s) of the international journey , unless the legal regime applied to the maritime transport is more favourable to the passenger.
Kui raudteesõidukeid transporditakse reisi osadel laevaga või kui raudteetransport asendatakse ajutiselt mõne muu transpordiliigiga, kohaldatakse CIV artiklit 31 .
Where railway vehicles are carried by ferry on parts of the journey or where rail transport is temporary replaced by another mode of transport, Article 31 of the CIV shall apply.
Artikli 18 lõige 2
Article 18, paragraph 2
Kui raudteetransport on ajutiselt katkestatud ja reisijaid veetakse mõne muu transpordiliigiga, vastutab raudtee-ettevõtja vastavalt käesoleva määruse sätetele.
When a transport by rail is temporarily suspended and the passengers are carried by another mode of transport, the railway undertaking is liable according to the provisions of this Regulation.
Covered by the previous amendment.
Covered by the previous amendment.
Artikkel 19
Article 19
Kui rahvusvahelist reisi teostab mitu järjestikku raudtee-ettevõtjat, vastutavad kõik asjaomased raudtee-ettevõtjad solidaarselt reisija surma või vigastuse korral, pagasi kahjustuste või hävimise, hilinemiste, ühendusreisidest mahajäämist põhjustavate hilinemiste või tühistamiste korral.
If the international journey is performed by successive railway undertakings, the railway undertakings involved in the transport shall be jointly and severally liable in the event of death or personal injuries to the passenger, or the event of damage to or loss of luggage or of delays, delays leading to missed connections or cancellations.
Kui reisi teostab mitu järjestikku raudtee-ettevõtjat, vastutavad kõik asjaomased raudtee-ettevõtjad solidaarselt reisija surma või vigastuse korral, pagasi kahjustuste või hävimise, hilinemiste, ühendusreisidest mahajäämist põhjustavate hilinemiste või tühistamiste korral.
If the journey is performed by successive railway undertakings, the railway undertakings involved in the transport shall be jointly and severally liable in the event of death or personal injuries to the passenger, or the event of damage to or loss of luggage or of delays, delays leading to missed connections or cancellations.
Artikkel 20
Article 20
Kui raudtee-ettevõtja on usaldanud veo korraldamise kas täies ulatuses või osaliselt asendavale raudtee-ettevõtjale, vastutab raudtee-ettevõtja ikkagi kogu transpordi eest.
Where a railway undertaking has entrusted the performance of the transport, in whole or in part, to a substitute railway undertaking, the railway undertaking shall nevertheless remain liable in respect of the entire transport.
Kui raudtee-ettevõtja on usaldanud veo korraldamise kas täies ulatuses või osaliselt asendavale raudtee-ettevõtjale, vastutab raudtee-ettevõtja vastavalt CIV artiklile 39 ikkagi kogu transpordi eest.
Where a railway undertaking has entrusted the performance of the transport, in whole or in part, to a substitute railway undertaking, the railway undertaking shall nevertheless remain liable in respect of the entire transport as provided for in Article 39 of the CIV.
Article 39 of the CIV contains a number of useful supplementary provisions concerning substitute railway undertakings.
Article 39 of the CIV contains a number of useful supplementary provisions concerning substitute railway undertakings.
Artikli 21 esimene lõik
Article 21, paragraph 1
Raudtee-ettevõtja vastutab oma personali ja muude isikute eest , kelle teenuseid ta veoteenuse osutamisel kasutab, kui nimetatud personal ja/või muud isikud toimivad oma ülesannete raames .
The railway undertaking shall be liable for its staff and other persons whose services it makes use of for the performance of the transport, when that staff and/or other persons are acting within the scope of their functions.
Raudtee-ettevõtja vastutab CIV artiklis 51 nimetatud isikute eest.
The railway undertaking shall be liable for persons as provided for in Article 51 of the CIV.
Article 21 entirely accords with Article 51 of the CIV.
Article 21 entirely accords with Article 51 of the CIV.
It is therefore sufficient to refer to that Convention.
It is therefore sufficient to refer to that Convention.
Artikli 21 teine lõik
Article 21, paragraph 2
Kasutatava raudteeinfrastruktuuri ettevõtja personal arvatakse isikute hulka, kelle teenuseid raudtee-ettevõtja kasutab veo korraldamisel.
The staff of the manager of the infrastructure on which the transport is performed shall be considered as persons whose services the railway undertaking makes use of for the performance of the transport.
Reisija surma või vigastuse puhul raudtee-ettevõtja vastutuse alusel esitatud kahjutasunõuete aegumistähtajad on järgmised:
The period of limitation of actions for damages based on the liability of the railway undertaking in case of death of, or personal injury to the passengers shall be:
Kahjutasunõuete aegumistähtajad on reguleeritud CIV artikliga 60.
The period of limitation for actions shall be governed by Article 60 of the CIV.
a) reisija puhul kolm aastat alates õnnetusele järgnenud päevast;
(a) in the case of the passenger, three years from the day after the accident;
b) muude õigusjärgsete isikute puhul kolm aastat alates reisija surmale järgnenud päevast, kuid maksimaalselt viis aastat pärast õnnetuse päeva.
(b) in the case of other persons entitled, three years from the day after the death of the passenger, subject to a maximum of five years from the day of the accident.
Muude veolepingust tulenevate nõuete aegumistähtaeg on kaks aastat alates juhtumi päevast.
The period of limitation for other actions arising out of the transport contract shall be two years reckoned from the date of the incident.
Artikli 24 teine lõik
Article 24, paragraph 2
Raudtee-ettevõtjal on õigus raudteeinfrastruktuuri-ettevõtjalt nõuda hüvitist, mis korvaks raudtee-ettevõtja poolt reisijale makstud hüvitise.
The railway undertaking shall have the right to claim compensation from the infrastructure manager to recover the compensation the railway undertaking has paid to the passengers.