natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Joseph Daul (esimees), Jean-Claude Fruteau (aseesimees), Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf (aseesimees), Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, María Esther Herranz García, Heinz Kindermann, Albert Jan Maat, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Kyösti Tapio Virrankosk
Joseph Daul (chairman), Jean-Claude Fruteau (vice-chairman), Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf (vice-chairman), Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, María Esther Herranz García, Heinz Kindermann, Albert Jan Maat, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
ühendusesiseseks kaubanduseks ette nähtud veiste sperma ladustamist puudutava direktiivi 87/328/EMÜ muutmist käsitleva nõukogu direktiivi ettepaneku kohta
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 87/328/EEC as regards the storage of semen of bovine animals intended for intra-Community trade
ühendusesiseseks kaubanduseks ette nähtud veiste sperma ladustamist puudutava direktiivi 87/328/EMÜ muutmist käsitleva nõukogu direktiivi ettepaneku kohta
on the proposal for a Council directive on amending Directive 87/328/EEC as regards the storage of semen of bovine animals intended for intra-Community trade
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0563 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0563 )
ELTs seni avaldamata. ;
OJ C ..., ..., p. ... ,
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artiklit 37, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga ( C6‑0117/2004 );;
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0117/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artiklit 51 ja artikli 43 lõiget 1;
– having regard to Rule 51 and Rule 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse põllumajanduskomisjoni raportit (A6‑0000/2004);
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture ( A6‑0035/2004 ),
Nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek, millega muudetakse direktiivi 87/328/EMÜ ühendusesiseseks kaubanduseks ette nähtud veiste sperma ladustamise kohta
Proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 87/328/EEC as regards the storage of semen of bovine animals intended for intra-Community trade
51 ja 43, lg 1
Rules 51 and 43(1)
AGRI 13.10.2004
AGRI 13.10.2004
Joseph Daul (esimees), Jean-Claude Fruteau (aseesimees), Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf (Vice-président), Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, María Esther Herranz García, Heinz Kindermann, Albert Jan Maat, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Joseph Daul (chairman), Jean-Claude Fruteau (vice-chairman), Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf (vice-chairman), Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, María Esther Herranz García, Heinz Kindermann, Albert Jan Maat, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Esitamise kuupäev – A6
Date tabled – A[6]
Teema: Nõukogu määruse ettepanek, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1782/2003, millega kehtestatakse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika raames kohaldatavate otsetoetuskavade ühiseeskirjad ning teatavad toetuskavad põllumajandustootjate jaoks, ning määrust (EÜ) nr 1788/2003, millega kehtestatakse tasu piima- ja piimatootesektoris
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector
nõukogu määruse ettepaneku kohta, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1782/2003, millega kehtestatakse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika raames kohaldatavate otsetoetuskavade ühiseeskirjad ning teatavad toetuskavad põllumajandustootjate jaoks, ning määrust (EÜ) nr 1788/2003, millega kehtestatakse tasu piima- ja piimatootesektoris
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0710 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0710 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 37 lõike 2, kolmandat lõiku, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga ( C6‑0170/2004 );
– having regard to Article 37(2)(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0170/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse põllumajanduskomisjoni raportit (A6‑0000/2004);
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture ( A6‑0036/2004 ),
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1782/2003, millega kehtestatakse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika raames kohaldatavate otsetoetuskavade ühiseeskirjad ning teatavad toetuskavad põllumajandustootjate jaoks, ning määrust (EÜ) nr 1788/2003, millega kehtestatakse tasu piima- ja piimatootesektoris
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector
EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 37 lõike 2 kolmas lõik
Article 37(2), subparagraph 3 EC
Joseph Daul (esimees), Jean-Claude Fruteau (aseesimees), Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf (aseesimees), Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, María Esther Herranz García, Heinz Kindermann, Albert Jan Maat, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Joseph Daul (chairman), Jean-Claude Fruteau (vice-chairman), Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf (vice-chairman), Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, María Esther Herranz García, Heinz Kindermann, Albert Jan Maat, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Teema: määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 850/98 süvavee korallriffide kaitse kohta traalimise mõjude eest Atlandi ookeani teatud aladel
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 850/98 as regards the protection of deep-water coral reefs from the effects of trawling in certain areas of the Atlantic Ocean
PE 347.075v02-00
PE 347.075v02-00
Keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjoni ARVAMUS ........12
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 12
määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 850/98 süvavee korallriffide kaitse kohta traalimise mõjude eest Atlandi ookeani teatud aladel
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 850/98 as regards the protection of deep-water coral reefs from the effects of trawling in certain areas of the Atlantic Ocean
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0058 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0058 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artiklit 37, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga ( C5‑0074/2004 );
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C5‑0074/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse kalanduskomisjoni raportit ja keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjon arvamust ( A6‑0037/2004 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0037/2004 ),
1 a) Määruse (EÜ) nr 2371/2002 artikkel 2 sätestab ka, et ühise kalanduspoliitika hea juhtimistava põhimõtted sisaldavad otsuste tegemise protsessi, mille aluseks on usaldusväärsed teadusalased nõuanded ning sidusrühmade laialdane kaasamine kõigil etappidel.
(1a) Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 also stipulates that the principles of good governance by which the Common Fisheries Policy should be guided include a decision-making process based on sound scientific advice and broad involvement of stakeholders at all stages.
See tähendab, et kalavarude majandamise asjus tuleb konsulteerida piirkondlike nõuandekomisjonidega valdkondades, kus pakutakse ühenduse alalhoiu- ja haldusmeetmeid.
This implies that the Regional Advisory Councils shall be consulted on the management of fisheries in those areas where Community measures addressing conservation and management are proposed.
Kalanduspoliitika raammääruses (EÜ) nr 2371/2002 sätestatud menetluskriteeriumitele mitteviitamine ei oleks õige.
It would be inappropriate not to refer to the procedural requirements of the CFP Framework Regulation (EC) 2371/2002.
3 a) Nende piirkondade kaitsmine kalapüügi erinevate mõjude eest on täielikult vastavuses 1995. a ÜRO kalavarude kokkuleppe artiklitega 5 ja 6, eriti nende sätetega, mis nõuavad ettevaatuspõhimõtte rakendamist ja bioloogilise mitmekesisuse kaitsmist merekeskkonnas.
(3a) The protection of these areas from the adverse impact of fishing is entirely consistent with, and required under, Articles 5 and 6 of the 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement, in particular the provisions requiring the application of the precautionary approach and the protection of biodiversity in the marine environment.
PÕHJENDUS 4
RECITAL 4
4) Vastavalt teaduslikele tõenditele on mööda merepõhja veetud traalnootadest kahjustatud elupaikade taastumine võimatu või väga raske ja aeglane.
(4) According to scientific evidence, recovery from damage to these habitats produced by trawl gear towed through the bottom is either impossible or very difficult and slow.
Seega on asjakohane keelustada põhjatraalnootade ja sarnaste seadmete kasutamine piirkondades, kus nimetatud elupaigad on jätkuvalt soodsas kaitsestaatuses.
It is therefore appropriate to prohibit the use of bottom trawls and similar gear in areas where these habitats are still in a favourable conservation status.
Seega on asjakohane keelustada selliste kalapüügivahendite kasutamine, mis tõenäoliselt põhjustavad tõsiseid kahjustusi korallriffidele piirkondades, kus nimetatud elupaigad on jätkuvalt soodsas kaitsestaatuses.
It is therefore appropriate to prohibit the use of fishing gear likely to cause real damage to coral reefs in areas where these habitats are still in a favourable conservation status.
Tuleb selgitada, et Euroopa Komisjoni meetmed käsitlevad korallriffe kahjustavaid kalapüügivahendeid.
It should be made clear that the Commission’s measures apply to fishing gear which damages coral reefs.
EI oleks õige mitte viidata uue kalanduspoliitika raammäärusele, nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 2371/2002.
It would be inappropriate not to refer to the Framework Regulation for the new CFP, Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Lõikes 4 sätestatud keeld ning punktides a ja b toodud koordinaadid vaadatakse üle viimaste olemasolevate teaduslike andmete alusel kaks aastat pärast nende jõustumist.
The ban laid down in paragraph 4 and the definition of coordinates contained in subparagraphs (a) and (b) thereof shall be reviewed, in the light of new scientific information available, two years after its entry into force.
Euroopa Komisjoni ettepaneku alus on suhteliselt ebakindlad teaduslikud andmed.
The Commission has based its proposal on a series of rather inconclusive scientific reports.
Kahe aasta pärast on võimalik nimetatud uuringuid täiendada, siis saab vööndeid täpsemalt määratleda ning kontrollida merepõhja kaitsmisel tehtud edusamme.
These studies could be completed in two years' time, and it would then be possible to define the areas more precisely and assess what progress has been made in protecting the sea bottom.
The aim of this Commission proposal is to protect the Atlantic deep-water coral reefs from trawling in certain areas of the Atlantic Ocean, those around the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands.
The aim of this Commission proposal is to protect the Atlantic deep-water coral reefs from trawling in certain areas of the Atlantic Ocean, those around the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands.
In order to achieve this objective, the measure proposed by the Commission is to include a ban on the use of trawls in the areas concerned by way of an amendment to the existing technical measures regulation (Regulation (EC) No 850/98).
In order to achieve this objective, the measure proposed by the Commission is to include a ban on the use of trawls in the areas concerned by way of an amendment to the existing technical measures regulation (Regulation (EC) No 850/98).
As stated in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, ‘the Common Fisheries Policy shall ensure exploitation of living aquatic resources that provides sustainable economic, environmental and social conditions’, an objective which the rapporteur shares and which entails a rigorous assessment of the economic, environmental and social impact of proposed legislation under the CFP.
As stated in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, ‘the Common Fisheries Policy shall ensure exploitation of living aquatic resources that provides sustainable economic, environmental and social conditions’, an objective which the rapporteur shares and which entails a rigorous assessment of the economic, environmental and social impact of proposed legislation under the CFP.
Nevertheless, the principle of protecting the environment cannot be accepted absolutely and unconditionally on the basis of an unrestricted, unbalanced and disproportionate precautionary principle which would eliminate or drastically restrict the possibility of exploiting resources through fishing.
Nevertheless, the principle of protecting the environment cannot be accepted absolutely and unconditionally on the basis of an unrestricted, unbalanced and disproportionate precautionary principle which would eliminate or drastically restrict the possibility of exploiting resources through fishing.
With regard to the environment, every effort must be made to minimise the impact of fishing activities on marine ecosystems, without forgetting other activities which also have an impact such as maritime transport and pollution.
With regard to the environment, every effort must be made to minimise the impact of fishing activities on marine ecosystems, without forgetting other activities which also have an impact such as maritime transport and pollution.
In economic and social terms, and with regard to the areas concerned by the proposed regulation, it must be borne in mind that these are highly sensitive outermost regions with a fragile economy where fishing and traditional fishing communities can account for more than 10% of the active population, as in the Azores.
In economic and social terms, and with regard to the areas concerned by the proposed regulation, it must be borne in mind that these are highly sensitive outermost regions with a fragile economy where fishing and traditional fishing communities can account for more than 10% of the active population, as in the Azores.
Although your rapporteur fully supports the aim of protecting the deep-water coral reefs, bearing in mind that these are threatened and vulnerable habitats which need special protection (as is recognised by the OSPAR Convention and UNICPOLOS) in the areas concerned, he is not convinced that the best way to guarantee it is by amending the technical measures regulation, which would be a last resort.
Although your rapporteur fully supports the aim of protecting the deep-water coral reefs, bearing in mind that these are threatened and vulnerable habitats which need special protection (as is recognised by the OSPAR Convention and UNICPOLOS) in the areas concerned, he is not convinced that the best way to guarantee it is by amending the technical measures regulation, which would be a last resort.
It should be stressed that, with their national jurisdictions over their exclusive economic zones (EEZs), the Member States have succeeded in managing and conserving resources in their waters, bearing in mind that, if only because of their proximity, it is the Member States that are most aware of the state of stocks in their waters and their specific ecosystems, which are sometimes ‘under attack’ when the opening of access for fleets from other countries increases the pressure on fishery resources.
It should be stressed that, with their national jurisdictions over their exclusive economic zones (EEZs), the Member States have succeeded in managing and conserving resources in their waters, bearing in mind that, if only because of their proximity, it is the Member States that are most aware of the state of stocks in their waters and their specific ecosystems, which are sometimes ‘under attack’ when the opening of access for fleets from other countries increases the pressure on fishery resources.
This is particularly true of Portugal and Spain, whose access derogations flowing from the accession treaties came to an end following the reform of the CFP.
This is particularly true of Portugal and Spain, whose access derogations flowing from the accession treaties came to an end following the reform of the CFP.
As the Commission states in its explanatory memorandum, ‘the Community fishing zone around the Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands contains several known or potential deep water habitats that have so far been preserved from trawling due to the special access regime defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/95 .
As the Commission states in its explanatory memorandum, ‘the Community fishing zone around the Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands contains several known or potential deep water habitats that have so far been preserved from trawling due to the special access regime defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/95 .
As this regime will cease to apply in 2004, it is now important [to] guarantee a continuity of the protection of these areas as part of Community legislation’.
As this regime will cease to apply in 2004, it is now important [to] guarantee a continuity of the protection of these areas as part of Community legislation’.
The rapporteur wishes to highlight that until recently, the deep-water habitats in question - coral aggregations, thermal vents and carbonate mounds - have been protected through national bans on bottom trawling in Spain and Portugal, as well as through restrictions on access to the waters concerned from other Member States.
The rapporteur wishes to highlight that until recently, the deep-water habitats in question - coral aggregations, thermal vents and carbonate mounds - have been protected through national bans on bottom trawling in Spain and Portugal, as well as through restrictions on access to the waters concerned from other Member States.
Restrictions of access have been based on the exclusive economic zones granted to these countries.
Restrictions of access have been based on the exclusive economic zones granted to these countries.
For this reason, the rapporteur is concerned at the attribution of exclusive competence for the ‘conservation of marine biological resources’ under Article 12 of the ‘constitutional treaty’ now in the process of being ratified, since it will tend to marginalise the competence of national and regional authorities which have in the past succeeded in preserving resources which are now under threat and whose protection is sought.
For this reason, the rapporteur is concerned at the attribution of exclusive competence for the ‘conservation of marine biological resources’ under Article 12 of the ‘constitutional treaty’ now in the process of being ratified, since it will tend to marginalise the competence of national and regional authorities which have in the past succeeded in preserving resources which are now under threat and whose protection is sought.
According to Article 9 of the Framework Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, Member States may take non-discriminatory measures for the conservation and management of fisheries resources and to minimise the effect of fishing on the conservation of the marine eco-systems within the zones where they have exclusive fishing rights, provided that the Community has not adopted measures addressing conservation and management specifically for this area.
According to Article 9 of the Framework Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, Member States may take non-discriminatory measures for the conservation and management of fisheries resources and to minimise the effect of fishing on the conservation of the marine eco-systems within the zones where they have exclusive fishing rights, provided that the Community has not adopted measures addressing conservation and management specifically for this area.
This provision should not be interpreted so that the Community does not respect the national provisions or the provisions relating to the national exclusive zones, while adopting technical conservation measures relating to these areas.
This provision should not be interpreted so that the Community does not respect the national provisions or the provisions relating to the national exclusive zones, while adopting technical conservation measures relating to these areas.
For the rapporteur, the fundamental question underlying the proposal seems to concern the relationship between the competences of the Community and those of the Member States under the CFP.
For the rapporteur, the fundamental question underlying the proposal seems to concern the relationship between the competences of the Community and those of the Member States under the CFP.
As regards the appropriateness of the conservation measures to be chosen under the new CFP, important questions of principle arise from the Commission’s proposal concerning the need to respect the national jurisdictions covering the exclusive economic zones.
As regards the appropriateness of the conservation measures to be chosen under the new CFP, important questions of principle arise from the Commission’s proposal concerning the need to respect the national jurisdictions covering the exclusive economic zones.
It must be remembered that an underlying reason for having exclusive national coastal zones limited to traditional fisheries is to conserve traditional fisheries in these ecologically fragile areas.
It must be remembered that an underlying reason for having exclusive national coastal zones limited to traditional fisheries is to conserve traditional fisheries in these ecologically fragile areas.
As to the proper Community measures to be taken to protect the European deep-water coral reefs, it is essential that all the relevant stakeholders, and in future the Regional Advisory Councils concerned, are consulted in time and regularly on the management of the sites.
As to the proper Community measures to be taken to protect the European deep-water coral reefs, it is essential that all the relevant stakeholders, and in future the Regional Advisory Councils concerned, are consulted in time and regularly on the management of the sites.
The rapporteur therefore considers it more appropriate to define the areas in which the ban applies as being the three respective EEZs of the Azores, Madeira and the Canaries as defined in Regulation No 2027/95.
The rapporteur therefore considers it more appropriate to define the areas in which the ban applies as being the three respective EEZs of the Azores, Madeira and the Canaries as defined in Regulation No 2027/95.
State of coral reefs as part of the wider European problem
State of coral reefs as part of the wider European problem