natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In practice, the prohibition on credit institutions entering into or continuing a correspondent banking relationship with a respondent bank which permits its accounts to be used by shell banks (i.e. indirect relationships with shell banks) cannot be applicable, as banks would have no means of verifying whether their respondents have relations with shell banks.
In practice, the prohibition on credit institutions entering into or continuing a correspondent banking relationship with a respondent bank which permits its accounts to be used by shell banks (i.e. indirect relationships with shell banks) cannot be applicable, as banks would have no means of verifying whether their respondents have relations with shell banks.
An obligation to know 'the customer's customer' is generally not workable, regardless of whether the customer is another credit institution, legal entity or natural person.
An obligation to know 'the customer's customer' is generally not workable, regardless of whether the customer is another credit institution, legal entity or natural person.
This inapplicable provision would only lead to bureaucracy and red tape, i.e. sending and filing questionnaires without any possibility of verification.
This inapplicable provision would only lead to bureaucracy and red tape, i.e. sending and filing questionnaires without any possibility of verification.
Liikmesriigid võivad lubada asutustel ja isikutel, kelle suhtes käesolevat direktiivi kohaldatakse, usaldada artikli 7 lõike 1 punktides a, b ja c sätestatud nõuete täitmise kolmandatele isikutele.
Member States may permit the institutions and persons covered by this Directive to rely on third parties to perform the requirements laid down in Article 7(1)(a), (b) and (c).
Liikmesriigid võivad lubada asutustel ja isikutel, kelle suhtes käesolevat direktiivi kohaldatakse, usaldada artikli 7 lõike 1 punktides a, b ja c sätestatud nõuete täitmise kolmandatele isikutele , kelle suhtes kohaldatakse samuti käesolevat direktiivi .
Member States may permit the institutions and persons covered by this Directive to rely on third parties that are also covered by this Directive to perform the requirements laid down in Article 7(1)(a), (b) and (c).
The amendment seeks to deliver some real benefits from the possibility of third compliance; as currently proposed those subject to the Directive would clearly have to duplicate compliance in order protect themselves from liability thus negating any advantage from such a system.
The amendment seeks to deliver some real benefits from the possibility of third compliance; as currently proposed those subject to the Directive would clearly have to duplicate compliance in order protect themselves from liability thus negating any advantage from such a system.
Lõplikult vastutab sellistel juhtudel kolmas isik .
The ultimate responsibility shall remain with the third party in such cases .
The Directive permits those covered to rely on third parties to carry out the due diligence checks in Article 12.
The Directive permits those covered to rely on third parties to carry out the due diligence checks in Article 12.
Although this rule might enhance the readiness of third parties to pass on information, it does not reduce the considerable burden placed on the institutions or persons concerned.
Although this rule might enhance the readiness of third parties to pass on information, it does not reduce the considerable burden placed on the institutions or persons concerned.
Faced with ultimate responsibility, there is no incentive for them to rely on information by the introducer without double-checking, which means that, in practice, identification checks would be duplicated anyway.
Faced with ultimate responsibility, there is no incentive for them to rely on information by the introducer without double-checking, which means that, in practice, identification checks would be duplicated anyway.
Igal juhul tunnustab ja aktsepteerib iga liikmesriik mis tahes muu liikmesriigi käesoleva direktiivi rakendamisest tulenevaid siseriiklikke õigusakte oma siseriiklike õigusaktidega täielikult kooskõlas olevana.
In any event, each Member State shall recognise and accept the domestic laws of any other Member State arising out of the implementation of this Directive as being in full compliance with its domestic laws.
Selle tulemusena peavad ühes liikmesriigis käesoleva direktiivi reguleerimisalasse kuuluvad asutused ja isikud aktsepteerima kliendi isiku tõendamise menetlusi, mida viivad läbi nemad või nende filiaalid, tütar- ja sidusettevõtted mõnes teises liikmesriigis vastavalt selle teise liikmesriigi siseriiklikele õigusaktidele, mis tulenevad käesoleva direktiivi rakendamisest.
As a result, institutions and persons subject to this Directive in one Member State shall be required to accept customer identification procedures carried out by them in or through their branches, subsidiaries and affiliates in any other Member State in accordance with the domestic laws of that other Member State arising out of the implementation of this Directive.
There is currently no consistency in the way that each Member State is enacting the Second Money-Laundering Directive (Member States have differing prescriptive documentary requirements regarding client identification).
There is currently no consistency in the way that each Member State is enacting the Second Money-Laundering Directive (Member States have differing prescriptive documentary requirements regarding client identification).
This failure is resulting in additional costs to customers and regulated businesses and hindering business in the European Union at a practical level, as well as giving an unfair advantage to one State at the expense of another, depending on how different the level of requirements might be.
This failure is resulting in additional costs to customers and regulated businesses and hindering business in the European Union at a practical level, as well as giving an unfair advantage to one State at the expense of another, depending on how different the level of requirements might be.
Vastava päringu korral edastab kolmas isik kohe asutusele või isikule, kelle juurde klient suunatakse, asjakohased koopiad kliendi isikut tõendavatest või isikusamasust tuvastatavatest andmetest ja muudest kliendi või tegelikult tulu saava omaniku isikut tõendavatest dokumentidest; käesolevat ja eelmist lõiku kohaldatakse sõltumatutel juriidilistel ametikohtadel töötajate suhtes ainult nende kliendi nõusolekul .
Relevant copies of identification or verification data and other relevant documentation on the identity of the customer or the beneficial owner shall immediately be forwarded by the third party to the institution or person to which the customer is being referred on request , save that this and the preceding paragraph shall apply to independent legal professionals only when their client has consented .
It would be a breach of the client/lawyer professional relationship for legal professionals to pass on information without the permission of the client.
It would be a breach of the client/lawyer professional relationship for legal professionals to pass on information without the permission of the client.
Artikli 21 lõige 3 a (uus)
Article 21, paragraph 3 a (new)
Kutsealad, mille õigusliku seisundi tõttu on teenuse osutamine kuni selge ebaseaduslikkuse ilmnemiseni kohustuslik, vabastatakse teenuse osutamisest hoidumise kohustusest.
Those professions the legal status of which makes the provision of the service in question obligatory, up to the limits of manifest illegality, shall be exempt from the requirement to refrain therefrom.
It is unacceptable for professional operators who suspect money-laundering activity to have to refrain from carrying out their own services (Article 21) if the financial intelligence unit so instructs them.
It is unacceptable for professional operators who suspect money-laundering activity to have to refrain from carrying out their own services (Article 21) if the financial intelligence unit so instructs them.
In the field of private transactions legislators can only set a clear, unambiguous and non-discretionary limit to the power to refuse to provide a professional service, in defence of the right of individuals to make their own legal arrangements in exercising their constitutional economic freedoms.
In the field of private transactions legislators can only set a clear, unambiguous and non-discretionary limit to the power to refuse to provide a professional service, in defence of the right of individuals to make their own legal arrangements in exercising their constitutional economic freedoms.
This rule provides that a service may be refused only in the case of manifest (doubt is not enough) illegality; and there are no legal hypotheses of temporary suspension.
This rule provides that a service may be refused only in the case of manifest (doubt is not enough) illegality; and there are no legal hypotheses of temporary suspension.
Asutused ja isikud, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse käesoleva direktiivi sätteid, ning nende juhid ja töötajad, välja arvatud sõltumatutel juriidilistel ametikohtadel töötajad , kes on seotud õigusnõu andmisega kliendile või ükskõik millisele isikule seoses kohtumenetlusega või sellise menetluse kaalumisel , ei avalikusta asjaomasele kliendile või teistele kolmandatele isikutele, et rahapesu andmebüroole on esitatud teavet vastavalt artiklile 19, 20 ja 21 või et rahapesuga seoses on või võib olla algatatud uurimine.
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive and their directors and employees , not including independent legal professionals in connection with the giving of legal advice to a client or to any person in connection with or in contemplation of legal proceedings, shall not disclose to the customer concerned nor to other third persons that information has been transmitted to the financial intelligence unit in accordance with Articles 19, 20 and 21 or that a money laundering investigation is being or may be carried out.
The right to inform the client should be retained for legal professionals in order to recognise their special duties to their clients.
The right to inform the client should be retained for legal professionals in order to recognise their special duties to their clients.
Mitteavalikustamise kohustust ei kohaldata, kui isikul või asutusel, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse käesolevat direktiivi, on siseriiklike õigusaktide kohaselt erilised avalikustamiskohustused.
The non-disclosure obligation shall not be applied when a person or institution subject to this Directive is charged with specific disclosure obligations under national legislation.
Liikmesriigid tagavad nende statistiliste aruannete koondülevaate avaldamise.
Member States shall ensure that a consolidated review of these statistical reports is published.
Statistics on the number of investigations, prosecutions and convictions following suspicious activity reports must be improved.
Statistics on the number of investigations, prosecutions and convictions following suspicious activity reports must be improved.
In this context, statistics should cover not only the number of suspicious transaction reports but also the follow-up given to those reports, the number of cases investigated, the number of persons prosecuted and the number of persons convicted.
In this context, statistics should cover not only the number of suspicious transaction reports but also the follow-up given to those reports, the number of cases investigated, the number of persons prosecuted and the number of persons convicted.
Artikli 37 lõike 1 sissejuhatav osa
Article 37, paragraph 1, introductory part
Selleks et võtta arvesse tehnilisi edusamme rahapesuvastases võitluses ja tagada käesoleva direktiivi ühtne kohaldamine, võtab komisjon artikli 38 lõikes 2 osutatud korras vastu järgmised rakendusmeetmed:
In order to take account of technical developments in the fight against money laundering and to ensure uniform application of this Directive, the Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 38(2), adopt the following implementing measures:
Selleks et võtta arvesse tehnilisi edusamme rahapesu- ja terrorismi rahastamise vastases võitluses ja tagada käesoleva direktiivi ühtne kohaldamine, võtab komisjon artikli 38 lõikes 2 osutatud korras vastu järgmised rakendusmeetmed:
In order to take account of technical developments in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing and to ensure uniform application of this Directive, the Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 38(2), adopt the following implementing measures:
This amendment follows on from the amendment that terrorist financing should be defined as a separate criminal offence alongside the definition of money laundering (see amendment to Article 1, paragraph 1, and Article 1, paragraph 3 (new).
This amendment follows on from the amendment that terrorist financing should be defined as a separate criminal offence alongside the definition of money laundering (see amendment to Article 1, paragraph 1, and Article 1, paragraph 3 (new).
Artikli 37 lõike 1 punkt a
Article 37, paragraph 1, point (a)
a) Artikli 1 lõikes 2, artikli 3 punkti 2 alapunktides a ja d ning punktides 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 ja 12 esitatud määratluste tehniliste aspektide selgitamine;
(a) clarification of the technical aspects of the definitions in Article 1(2 ) and in Article 3(2)(a) and (d), (5), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12);
a) Artikli 1 lõigetes 2 ja 2 a , artikli 3 punkti 2 alapunktides a ja d ning punktides 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 ja 12 esitatud määratluste tehniliste aspektide selgitamine;
(a) clarification of the technical aspects of the definitions in Article 1(2) and 2a and in Article 3(2)(a) and (d), (5), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12);
Artikli 38 lõige 1
Article 38, paragraph 1
Komisjoni abistab rahapesu vältimise komitee, edaspidi "komitee".
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on the Prevention of Money Laundering, hereinafter “the Committee”.
Komisjoni abistab rahapesu vältimise komitee, edaspidi "komitee" ; nimetatud komitee esitab koos komisjoniga Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule oma tegevuse ja arutelude kohta aastaaruande .
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on the Prevention of Money Laundering, hereinafter “the Committee” , which Committee shall, together with the Commission, deliver an annual report on its activities and deliberations to the European Parliament and to the Council .
The issues to be dealt with by the Committee are not just technical and reflect on the overall functioning and content of the Directive.
The issues to be dealt with by the Committee are not just technical and reflect on the overall functioning and content of the Directive.
There should therefore be some democratic oversight.
There should therefore be some democratic oversight.
Aruandes käsitletakse eelkõige vastavalt direktiivi 2001/97/EÜ artiklis 2 sätestatu kohaselt ülevaadatavaid valdkondi.
The report shall relate, in particular, to the fields to be reviewed as laid down in Article 2 of Directive 2001/97/EC.
To ensure that the review provided for in the second directive (Directive 2001/97/EC) is also carried out under the third.
To ensure that the review provided for in the second directive (Directive 2001/97/EC) is also carried out under the third.
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Marcin Libicki, Alain Lipietz, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Viktória Mohácsi, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Daniel Stroz, Theresa Villiers, Diana Wallis, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Marcin Libicki, Alain Lipietz, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Viktória Mohácsi, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Daniel Stroz, Theresa Villiers, Diana Wallis, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Alexander Nuno Alvaro, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Adeline Hazan, Barbara Kudrycka, Kurt Lechner, Evelin Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, József Szájer
Alexander Nuno Alvaro, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Adeline Hazan, Barbara Kudrycka, Kurt Lechner, Evelin Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, József Szájer
PETITSIOONIKOMISJONI ARVAMUS
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS
Teema: Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek rahandussüsteemi rahapesuks, sealhulgas terrorismi rahastamiseks kasutamise vältimise kohta
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing
JUSTIFICATION SUCCINTE
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
Ce n’est pas la première fois que le Parlement européen est confronté au délicat problème de la proportionnalité entre les exigences en matière d’ordre et de sécurité publique et celles relatives aux droits fondamentaux.
This is not the first time that Parliament has had to address the delicate issue of balancing the need to maintain public order and security and the need to safeguard fundamental rights.
La commission des libertés civiles a récemment présenté et fait approuver par le Parlement européen un rapport d’initiative sur le futur de l’Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice, rapport Bourlanges ( A6-0010/2004 ), adopté le 14 octobre 2004 (T6-0022/2004), auquel il a été ajouté en plénière - avec 329 voix pour - un amendement qui prévoit l’évaluation préalable de toute nouvelle proposition d’acte législatif sur la base du respect des droits fondamentaux (exiger l'évaluation préalable du respect des droits fondamentaux (tels que définis par la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union) pour tout acte législatif de l'Union ou de la Communauté).
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs has recently submitted (and secured Parliament's adoption of) an own-initiative report on the future of the area of freedom, security and justice (the Bourlanges report [ A6-0010/2004 ], which was adopted on 14 October 2004 [T6-0022/2004]), and also an amendment (adopted in plenary with 329 votes in favour) which provides for the preliminary assessment of any new proposal for a legislative act from the point of view of upholding fundamental rights.
La proposition de directive relative à la prévention de l’utilisation du système financier aux fins de blanchiment de capitaux, y compris le financement du terrorisme, devrait donc s’inscrire dans cette zone grise où les droits et les libertés individuelles risquent d’être supprimés en vertu d’un intérêt général supérieur à la prévention et à la répression des activités terroristes.
Prior assessment intended to ensure that the fundamental rights defined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights are upheld will have to be carried out in respect of any EU or EC legislative act.
En fait, le législateur semble conscient du fait que la portée et le champ d’application de la réglementation en question risquent de faire naître un conflit d’intérêts.
The proposal for a directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering (including terrorist financing) therefore belongs in the grey area in which individual rights and freedoms may have to be sacrificed in the higher general interest of preventing and repressing terrorist activity.
Tant il est vrai qu’il s’évertue dans le dernier considérant de la proposition (considérant 29) à réitérer la conformité de la présente directive aux droits fondamentaux et aux principes reconnus dans la Charte de Nice, aujourd’hui incorporée à la partie II du Traité constitutionnel, ainsi qu’à la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme.
The legislator does certainly appear to be aware of the danger that the scope of the proposed legislation may give rise to a conflict of interests - so much so that in the proposal's final recital (recital 29) he makes a point of emphasising that the directive 'respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised' in the Nice Charter (which has now been incorporated into the second part of the Constitutional Treaty), and also complies with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Toutefois, dans le corps des dispositions normatives composant la proposition, cette affirmation se traduit par une banale requête de principe, ce qui offense l’éthique politique du Parlement européen qui, depuis la proclamation de la Charte à Nice, s’est engagé à en respecter le fond dans l’exercice de ses pouvoirs institutionnels.
However, the substance of the provisions laid down in the proposal embodies merely a commonplace statement of principle that falls short of the political ethic adopted by Parliament, which - ever since the Charter was proclaimed in Nice - has endeavoured to abide by the substance of that charter as it exercises the powers conferred upon it as an institution.
Celui-ci se prépare, à l’occasion de l’avis sur le traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe, à reconnaître que cette obligation s’étend à toutes les institutions de l’Union: l’incorporation de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’UE dans la partie II de la Constitution, ce qui signifie que toutes les dispositions du droit de l’Union européenne et que toutes les mesures prises par les institutions de l’UE ou fondées sur le droit de l'Union devront respecter ces normes (résolution du PE sur le T6 0004/2005 du 12/1/05).
In its opinion on the Constitutional Treaty it recognises that all the EU institutions are bound by the same obligation: the incorporation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in part II of the Constitution, which means that all provisions of European Union law and all measures taken by the EU institutions or based on EU law will have to comply with those standards (EP resolution T6 0004/2005 of 12/1/05).
La Commission européenne a également toujours montré sa volonté d’adhérer à cette approche proactive vis-à-vis de la Charte constitutionnelle, comme son ex-président, R. Prodi, l’a souligné au terme de la dernière CIG, dans un message adressé à ses fonctionnaires: «L'inclusion de la Charte des droits fondamentaux dans ce texte, la claire affirmation des valeurs et des objectifs de l'Union ainsi que des principes de base qui régissent les relations entre l'Union et ses États membres, nous permettent d'appeler ce texte de base notre Constitution».
The Commission too has always demonstrated that it wishes to adopt a similar pro-active approach to the Constitutional Charter, as emphasised by its former President - Mr Prodi - at the end of the last IGC in a message addressed to his own officials: 'The inclusion of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in this text and the clear statement of the EU's values and objectives and of the basis principles governing relations between the EU and its Member States mean that we can describe this basic text as our Constitution'.
Dans le cas de l’objet de la pétition n° 693/2003
In the case referred to in Petition 693/2003
Fdr CM\528795). , concernant les activités normales de conseil et de représentation procédurale réalisées par les avocats, sous différents profiles, les libertés et les droits fondamentaux peuvent être mis en danger, à commencer par la protection des données à caractère personnel (II-68 du Traité constitutionnel) et des libertés d’expression et d’information (II-71 du Traité constitutionnel), la liberté d’exercice d’une profession choisie librement (II-75.2 du Traité constitutionnel ) et le droit de recourir à un juge impartial.
This applies to the protection of personal data (II-68 of the Constitutional Treaty), freedom of expression and information (II-71 of the Constitutional Treaty), the freedom to choose an occupation and the right to engage in work (II-75.2 of the Constitutional Treaty), and the right to appeal to an impartial judge.