natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kasutuskuluanalüüsi meetod kasutab Euroopa Keskpanga andmete alusel reaalset diskontomäära ja energiat tarbiva toote realistlikku olelustsüklit; see on müügihinna erinevuste (mis on tingitud tootmiskulude erinevustest) ja kasutuskulude erinevuste, mis tulenevad mitmesuguste tehniliste võimaluste erinevusest, summa, mis diskonteeritakse vaadeldavate tüüpiliste energiat tarbivate toodete mudelite olelustsükli jooksul.
The life cycle cost analysis method uses a real discount rate on the basis of data provided from the European Central Bank and a realistic lifetime for the EuP; it is based on the sum of the variations in purchase price (resulting from the variations in industrial costs) and in operating expenses, which result from the different levels of technical improvement options, discounted over the lifetime of the representative EuP models considered.
Kasutuskulud sisaldavad peamiselt energiatarbimist ja lisakulusid muudele ressurssidele (nagu vesi või pesuvahend).
The operating expenses cover primarily energy consumption and additional expenses in other resources (such as water or detergent).
Energia tarbimise osas kasutamisel kehtestatakse tüüpiliste energiat tarbivate toodete mudelitele spetsiaalsed keskkonnasõbraliku tootekujunduse nõuded kas turul oleva tõhusaima toote või lõpptarbijale madalaimate kasutuskulude tasemel, arvestades sealjuures ka tagajärgi muudele keskkondlikele aspektidele.
Concerning energy consumption in use, specific ecodesign requirements shall be established at either the level of the best performing product available on the market or at the level of lowest life-cycle cost to end users for representative EuP models, taking into account the consequences on other environmental aspects.
Vähimate tõhususstandardite kehtestamisel tuleb arvestada ka süsinikdioksiidi tootmise vältimisest saadavat kasu.
In the process of setting minimum efficiency standards, a value for the avoided carbon dioxide emissions should also be taken into account.
Süsinikdioksiidi tootmisest saadava kasu väärtuse määrab kindlaks Euroopa Komisjon ja ajakohastab seda regulaarselt.
The value for the avoided carbon dioxide emissions shall be determined by the Commission and be regularly updated.
Toodetud süsinikdioksiidi väliskulud kaasatakse baasarvutusse.
External costs of carbon dioxide emissions may be included in the base-case calculation.
Teiste rakendusmeetme jaoks valitud aspektide osas, v.a energiatarbimine kasutusel, määrab toote võrdlusalused sõltumatu ekspertorgan koostöös tootjatega, kes annavad vastavad andmed.
For aspects other than energy consumption in use, chosen for an implementing measure, the independent body of experts, with the cooperation of manufacturers providing data, will establish the benchmark for the product.
Konkreetsed keskkonnasõbraliku tootekujunduse nõuded kehtestatakse kas parima olemasoleva tehnoloogia või madalaimate kasutuskulude tasemel, võttes arvesse ka mõju muude keskkonnaaspektide osas.
Specific ecodesign requirements shall be established either at the level of Best Available Technology or at the level of lowest life-cycle cost , taking into account the consequences for other environmental aspects.
Teostatakse oluliste tegurite (energia või muu ressursi hind, toorainete maksumus, tootmiskulud, diskontomäärad) mõju analüüs ja vajadusel ka väliste keskkonnakulude analüüs, et kontrollida, kas on olulisi muutusi ja kas üldised järeldused on usaldatavad.
A sensitivity analysis covering the relevant factors (such as the price of energy or other resource, the cost of raw materials or production costs, discount rates) and, where appropriate, external environmental costs, will be carried out to check if there are significant changes and if the overall conclusions are reliable.
Sellele vastavalt muudetakse ka nõuet.
The requirement will be adapted accordingly.
Samu meetodeid saaks kasutada ka teiste ressursside (näiteks vee) puhul.
A similar methodology could be applied to other resources such as water.
Based on EP Amendment 67.
Based on EP Amendment 67.
Reintroduces a clear ambition level for both energy-in-use requirements and non-energy-in-use requirements (‘minimising’ instead of ‘reducing’, and use of best practice/ best performance on the market or BAT benchmarks), reintroduces the proper wording on LLCC and the internalisation of external costs of avoided CO 2 in the calculation.
Reintroduces a clear ambition level for both energy-in-use requirements and non-energy-in-use requirements (‘minimising’ instead of ‘reducing’, and use of best practice/ best performance on the market or BAT benchmarks), reintroduces the proper wording on LLCC and the internalisation of external costs of avoided CO 2 in the calculation.
IV LISA PUNKT 1
ANNEX IV, POINT 1
Käesolevas lisas kirjeldatakse korda, mille kohaselt käesoleva lisa 2. jaos talle pandud kohustusi täitev tootja või selle volitatud esindaja tagab ja deklareerib, et energiat tarbiv toode vastab rakendusmeetme selle kohta käivatele nõuetele.
This Annex describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or its authorised representative who carries out the obligations laid down in section 2 of this Annex ensures and declares that the EuP satisfies the relevant requirements of the applicable implementing measure.
Vastavusdeklaratsioon võib olla väljastatud ühe või mitme toote kohta ja see peab olema tootja valduses.
The declaration of conformity may cover one or more products and must be kept by the manufacturer.
Vastavusdeklaratsioon võib olla väljastatud ühe või mitme toote kohta ja see peab olema ühenduses tootja valduses.
The declaration of conformity may cover one or more products and must be kept within the Community by the manufacturer.
IV LISA PUNKT 3
ANNEX IV, POINT 3
Tootja peab tegema kõik selleks, et toode toodetaks kooskõlas jaos 2 viidatud kujundusspetsifikatsioonidele ja sellele kohaldatava meetme nõuetele.
The manufacturer must take all measures necessary to ensure that the product will be manufactured in compliance with the design specifications referred to in section 2 and with the requirements of the measure which apply to it.
Tootja peab tegema kõik selleks, et toode toodetaks kooskõlas jaos 2 viidatud projekteerimisspetsifikatsioonidega ja sellele kohaldatava meetme nõuetega.
The manufacturer must take all measures necessary to ensure that the product is manufactured in compliance with the design specifications referred to in section 2 and with the requirements of the measure which apply to it.
The manufacturer should ensure that an EuP is produced according to EU law, while trading companies, which buy finished products and sell them on the most convenient market, should ensure that the products they buy have been produced in compliance with the requirements established by EU legislation.
The manufacturer should ensure that an EuP is produced according to EU law, while trading companies, which buy finished products and sell them on the most convenient market, should ensure that the products they buy have been produced in compliance with the requirements established by EU legislation.
In order to place a product on the EU market, it must be ensured that it will be designed and manufactured according to the applicable legal requirements in Europe.
In order to place a product on the EU market, it must be ensured that it will be designed and manufactured according to the applicable legal requirements in Europe.
V LISA PUNKT 1
ANNEX V, POINT 1
Käesolevas lisas kirjeldatakse korda, mille kohaselt käesoleva lisa 2. jaos talle pandud kohustusi täitev tootja või selle volitatud esindaja tagab ja deklareerib, et energiat tarbiv toode vastab rakendusmeetme selle kohta käivatele nõuetele.
This Annex describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer who satisfies the obligations of section 2 of this Annex ensures and declares that the EuP satisfies the requirements of the applicable implementing measure.
Vastavusdeklaratsioon võib olla väljastatud ühe või mitme toote kohta ja see peab olema tootja valduses .
The declaration of conformity may cover one or more products and must be kept by the manufacturer.
Vastavusdeklaratsioon võib olla väljastatud ühe või mitme toote kohta ja see peab olema ühenduses tootja jaoks kättesaadav .
The declaration of conformity may cover one or more products and must be available to the manufacturer within the Community.
In order to allow market surveillance authorities to monitor the market effectively, they should be put in a position to check the technical documentation of EuP when relevant for assessing the conformity of a product.
In order to allow market surveillance authorities to monitor the market effectively, they should be put in a position to check the technical documentation of EuP when relevant for assessing the conformity of a product.
To ensure that such documentation is readily available when demanded by market surveillance authorities, the documentation should be available to the manufacturer in the Community.
To ensure that such documentation is readily available when demanded by market surveillance authorities, the documentation should be available to the manufacturer in the Community.
As a result, the manufacturer (as defined in the directive) must have the documentation when the product is placed on the market.
As a result, the manufacturer (as defined in the directive) must have the documentation when the product is placed on the market.
This will represent a deterrent for free-riders.
This will represent a deterrent for free-riders.
I lisa 1. osas mainitud keskkonnasõbraliku tootekujunduse parameetrid, mille jaoks ei ole vaja keskkonnasõbraliku tootekujunduse nõudeid;
3. the ecodesign parameters referred to in Annex I, part 1 relating to which no ecodesign requirement is necessary;
The newly introduced paragraph 3 is inadequate as it introduces the idea of the implementing measure saying that no ecodesign requirement is necessary.
The newly introduced paragraph 3 is inadequate as it introduces the idea of the implementing measure saying that no ecodesign requirement is necessary.
This is counterproductive as it will encourage industry not to improve the performance of their products with respect to these “non-requirements”.
This is counterproductive as it will encourage industry not to improve the performance of their products with respect to these “non-requirements”.
This will be an impediment for innovation and it is very unusual to state in a legal document that no performance is required.
This will be an impediment for innovation and it is very unusual to state in a legal document that no performance is required.
It would be also create an effective restriction on establishment of national requirements on aspects, despite the fact that they are not regulated at EU level .
It would be also create an effective restriction on establishment of national requirements on aspects, despite the fact that they are not regulated at EU level .
VII LISA PUNKT 6
ANNEX VII, POINT 6
6. otsuse 93/465/EMÜ alusel tehtava vastavushindamise üksikasjad
6. the details for conformity assessment under Decision 93/465/EEC
– kui kasutatav(ad) moodul(id) on moodulist A erinev(ad); konkreetse korra valimise tegurid;
- where the module(s) to be applied is (are) different from Module A; the factors leading to the selection of that specific procedure ;
– vastavushindamise korra valimise tegurid; eraldi tuleb vaadelda järgmisi faktoreid:
- the factors leading to the selection of the conformity assessment procedure ; the factors to be specifically considered are:
a) olemasolev riiklik või Euroopa keskkonnaalane ja/või turvalisusealane seadusandlus konkreetse tooterühma jaoks, mida peab testima kolmas osapool
a) existing national or European environmental and/or safety legislation for the product group in question requiring third party testing
b) ebapiisavad ise väljastatud vastavusdeklaratsioonid või ebapiisav vastavusalase keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemi kasutamine keskkonnasõbralikus tootekujunduses
b) unsatisfactory self declarations of conformity, or use of EMS of conformity in the field of ecodesign
c) keskkonnamõju või vajaliku täiustamise pakilisuse aste
c) magnitude or urgency of the environmental impact or improvements that are needed
- vajadusel kolmandate poolte heakskiidu ja/või sertifitseerimise kriteeriumid;
- where relevant the criteria for approval and/or certification of the third parties;
-vajadusel kolmandate poolte heakskiidu ja/või sertifitseerimise kriteeriumid
- where relevant the criteria for approval and/or certification of the third parties
kui sama energiat tarbiva toote jaoks on teistes CE-nõuetes sätestatud erinevad moodulid, kohaldatakse konkreetse nõude jaoks rakendusmeetmes määratud moodulit;
where different modules are laid down in other CE requirements for the same EuP, the module defined in the implementing measure will prevail for the requirement concerned;
A clear definition, including setting certain criteria for when the different modules are going to be used, needs to be given.
A clear definition, including setting certain criteria for when the different modules are going to be used, needs to be given.
VII LISA PUNKT 7 A (uus)
ANNEX VII, POINT 7 A (new)
7 a. võimalikud ökomärgised, lisaks artikli 8 lõikes 4 toodud vastavust kinnitavale ühenduse ökomärgisele, mida peetakse samuti ühenduse ökomärgise nõuetele vastavaks.
7a. possible eco-labels other than the Community eco-label, as referred to in Article 8(4) for the purpose of presumption of conformity, which are considered to fulfil conditions equivalent to the Community eco-label.
VII LISA A (uus)
ANNEX VII A (new)
VII lisa a
Annex VIIa
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatuste minimaalsed abikõlblikkuskriteeriumid seoses käesoleva direktiiviga
Minimum eligibility criteria for self-regulatory initiatives in the context of this Directive
Õiguslikud põhinõuded
Basic Legal Requirements
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatused peavad vastama kõikidele asutamislepingu sätetele (eelkõige siseturu- ja konkurentsialastele sätetele), samuti ühenduse rahvusvahelistele kohustustele, sealhulgas mitmepoolsetele kaubanduseeskirjadele.
Self-regulatory initiatives shall comply with all provisions of the Treaty (in particular internal market and competition rules), as well as with the international engagements of the Community, including multilateral trade rules.
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatused peavad olema osalemiseks avatud kolmandate maade osalejatele nii ettevalmistavas kui ka täideviimisetapis.
Self-regulatory initiatives shall be open to the participation of third country operators, both in the preparatory and in the implementation phases.
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatuste tulemuseks peab olema teatud lisaväärtus (senise olukorraga võrreldes), mis väljendub kõnealuse ETT keskkonnatulemuste paranemises.
Self-regulatory initiatives shall deliver added value (more than “business as usual”) in terms of the improved overall environmental performance of the EuP covered.
Iseregulatsioonis osalevad ettevõtted ja nende ühendused peavad esindama suurt enamust asjaomasest majandusharust võimalikult väikese arvu eranditega.
Industry and their associations taking part in a self-regulatory action shall represent a large majority of the relevant economic sector, with as few exceptions as possible.
Tagatud peab olema konkurentsireeglitest kinnipidamine.
Care shall be taken to ensure respect for competition rules.
Kvantifitseeritud ja astmelised eesmärgid
Quantified and Staged Objectives
Asjaomaste poolte määratletud eesmärgid koostatakse selgelt ja täpselt, lähtudes korrektselt määratletud alusest.
The objectives defined by the stakeholders shall be set in clear and unambiguous terms, starting from a well-defined baseline.
Kui iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatus on pikaajaline, nähakse ette vahe-eesmärgid.
If the self-regulatory initiative covers a long time-span, interim targets shall be included.
Eesmärkidest ja vahe-eesmärkidest kinnipidamist peab olema võimalik kättesaadavatel tingimustel ja usaldusväärselt kontrollida, kasutades selgeid ja usaldusväärseid kriteeriume.
It must be possible to monitor compliance with objectives and (interim) targets in an affordable and credible way using clear and reliable indicators.
Selliste näitajate väljatöötamist hõlbustavad teadusuuringute tulemused ning teaduslik ja tehniline alusteave.
Research information, scientific and technological background data shall facilitate the development of these indicators.
Kodanikuühiskonna osalus
Involvement of civil society
Läbipaistvuse tagamiseks peavad iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatused olema avalikud, sealhulgas Interneti ja muude elektrooniliste teabelevitamisvahendite kaudu.
With a view to ensuring transparency, self-regulatory initiatives shall be publicised, including through the use of the internet and other electronic means of disseminating information.
Samasugune läbipaistvuse nõue kehtib ka vahe- ja lõpparuannete kohta.
The same shall apply to interim and final monitoring reports.
Osalejatel, eelkõige ettevõtetel, keskkonnakaitsega tegelevatel valitsusvälistel organisatsioonidel ja tarbijate ühendustel peab olema võimalus väljendada oma seisukohta kõikide iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatuste suhtes.
Stakeholders - namely industry, environmental NGOs and consumers’ associations - shall have the right to comment on a self-regulatory initiative.
Järelevalve ja aruandekohustus
Monitoring and reporting
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatustes peab sisalduma läbimõeldud järelevalvesüsteem, milles määratletakse selgelt ettevõtete ja sõltumatute kontrollijate ülesanded.
Self-regulatory initiatives shall contain a well-designed monitoring system, with clearly identified responsibilities for industry and independent inspectors.
Eesmärkide täitmist palutakse kontrollida komisjoni talitustel koostöös iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatustes osalejatega.
The Commission services, in partnership with the parties to the self-regulatory initiative, shall be invited to monitor the achievement of the objectives.
Järelevalve- ja aruandlusprogramm peab olema üksikasjalik, läbipaistev ja erapooletu.
The plan for monitoring and reporting shall be detailed, transparent and objective.
Komisjoni ülesanne on artiklis 14 nimetatud komitee abiga kontrollida aluseemärkide täitmist.
It shall remain for the Commission services assisted by the Committee referred to in Article 14, to consider whether the underlying objectives have been met.
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatuse haldamise kulutõhusus
Cost-effectiveness of Administering a Self-regulatory Initiative
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatuse haldamise kulud, eelkõige kontrollimisega seotud kulud ei tohi tuua kaasa ebaproportsionaalselt suurt halduskoormust võrreldes selle eesmärkide ja muude olemasolevate poliitiliste vahenditega.
The cost of administering self-regulatory initiatives, in particular as regards monitoring, shall not lead to a disproportionate administrative burden, as compared to their objectives and to other available policy instruments.
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatused peavad vastama käesoleva direktiivi poliitilistele eesmärkidele, eelkõige integreeritud lähenemise eesmärgile, samuti säästva arengu majanduslikule ja sotsiaalsele mõõtmele.
Self-regulatory initiatives shall respond to the policy objectives of this Directive including the integrated approach and shall be consistent with the economic and social dimensions of sustainable development.
Arvesse tuleb võtta tarbijakaitsega seotud huvisid (tervis, elukvaliteet ja majanduslikud huvid).
The protection of consumers’ interests (health, quality of life and economic interests) shall be integrated.
Stimuleerivate meetmete ühilduvus
Incentive compatibility
Iseregulatsiooniga seotud algatused ei anna tõenäoliselt soovitud tulemusi, kui muud tegurid ja stimuleerivad meetmed – turusurve, maksud ja riiklikud õigusaktid – annavad algatuses osalejatele vasturääkivaid signaale.
Self-regulatory initiatives are unlikely to deliver the expected results if other factors and incentives - market pressure, taxes, and legislation at national level - send contradictory signals to participants in the commitment.
Poliitika järjepidevus on siin vältimatu ja seda tuleb algatuse tõhususe hindamisel arvesse võtta.
Policy consistency is essential in this regard and shall be taken into consideration when assessing the effectiveness of the initiative.
Reinstatement of Amendment 73 from first reading.
Reinstatement of Amendment 73 from first reading.
Council has reached a political agreement on the proposed directive on setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products (EuP) under Irish Presidency in June 2004.
Council has reached a political agreement on the proposed directive on setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products (EuP) under Irish Presidency in June 2004.
The final common position has been adopted by Council on 29 November and transmitted to the European Parliament by letter of 13 December 2004.
The final common position has been adopted by Council on 29 November and transmitted to the European Parliament by letter of 13 December 2004.
In its first reading, Parliament adopted 78 amendments to this important framework directive designed to reduce the adverse impact of energy-using products on the environment throughout the life-cycle of those products.
In its first reading, Parliament adopted 78 amendments to this important framework directive designed to reduce the adverse impact of energy-using products on the environment throughout the life-cycle of those products.
The main issues addressed in these amendments were the provisions on the implementing measures, the establishment of a working plan, the role of self-regulation, the establishment of an Eco-Design Board, the options for conformity assessment, the eco-design requirements (generic/specific), a credible system of market surveillance, support for SMEs and information to consumers as well as a review clause and a double legal base.
The main issues addressed in these amendments were the provisions on the implementing measures, the establishment of a working plan, the role of self-regulation, the establishment of an Eco-Design Board, the options for conformity assessment, the eco-design requirements (generic/specific), a credible system of market surveillance, support for SMEs and information to consumers as well as a review clause and a double legal base.
In quantitative terms, the Commission subsequently accepted roughly a third of Parliament's amendments (23 amendments fully, in substance, partially or in principle), Council followed the same approach in its common position.
In quantitative terms, the Commission subsequently accepted roughly a third of Parliament's amendments (23 amendments fully, in substance, partially or in principle), Council followed the same approach in its common position.
A more substantial analysis however reveals that only a few important requests have been taken on board in the common position.
A more substantial analysis however reveals that only a few important requests have been taken on board in the common position.
These concern in particular the market surveillance mechanisms (Article 3), the establishment of a working plan (Article 13), the establishment of a Consultation Forum similar to Parliament's Eco-Design Board (Article 14) and the review clause concerning the effectiveness of the directive and its implementing measures, market surveillance mechanisms and any relevant self regulation stimulated (Article 19).
These concern in particular the market surveillance mechanisms (Article 3), the establishment of a working plan (Article 13), the establishment of a Consultation Forum similar to Parliament's Eco-Design Board (Article 14) and the review clause concerning the effectiveness of the directive and its implementing measures, market surveillance mechanisms and any relevant self regulation stimulated (Article 19).
Council's common position however rejects third-party verification as a principle in the conformity assessment and insists on the inclusion of environmental management standards and schemes (Art. 7).
Council's common position however rejects third-party verification as a principle in the conformity assessment and insists on the inclusion of environmental management standards and schemes (Art. 7).