natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19 a) Käesoleva direktiivi kohaselt oma rakendusvolitusi teostades peaks komisjon arvesse võtma järgmisi põhimõtteid: vajadus tagada suur läbipaistvus ning konsulteerimine käesoleva direktiiviga hõlmatud asutuste ja isikutega ning Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukoguga; vajadus tagada, et pädevad asutused on võimelised järjepidevalt tagama eeskirjade täitmise; käesoleva direktiiviga hõlmatud asutuste ja isikute kulude ning kasu pikaajaline tasakaal kõikide rakendusmeetmete puhul; vajadus säilitada rakendusmeetmete kohaldamisel vajalik paindlikkus vastavalt riskiastmest sõltuvale põhilähenemisviisile; vajadus tagada kooskõla ELi muude selle valdkonna õigusaktidega ning vajadus kaitsta Euroopa Liitu, selle liikmesriike ja nende kodanikke rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tagajärgede eest.
(19a) In exercising its implementing powers in accordance with this Directive, the Commission should respect the following principles: the need for high levels of transparency and consultation with institutions and persons covered by this Directive and with the European Parliament and the Council; the need to ensure that competent authorities will be able to ensure compliance with the rules consistently; the balance of costs and benefits to institutions and persons covered by this Directive on a long-term basis in any implementing measures; the need to maintain the necessary flexibility in the application of the implementing measures in accordance with a risk-sensitive basic approach; the need to ensure coherence with other EU legislation in this area; and the need to protect the European Union, its Member States and their citizens from the consequences of money laundering and terrorist financing.
As the Directive would introduce the adoption of implementing measures, it is necessary to avoid any over-regulation in this field.
As the Directive would introduce the adoption of implementing measures, it is necessary to avoid any over-regulation in this field.
There should be a clear reference, in a recital at least, to proper consultation of interested parties for the adoption of implementing measures by the Commission.
There should be a clear reference, in a recital at least, to proper consultation of interested parties for the adoption of implementing measures by the Commission.
It should also be stipulated that a balance of costs and benefits should be ensured.
It should also be stipulated that a balance of costs and benefits should be ensured.
29 a) Käesolevas direktiivis ei peaks "fondid, õiguslikud üksused ja usaldusühingud" hõlmama:
(29a) For the purposes of this Directive ‘Foundation, legal arrangements and trusts’ should not include:
i) fondi, õiguslikku üksust või usaldusühingut, mille raames emiteeritakse juriidilise isiku võlainstrument, mis kajastub tunnustatud börsil noteeritud äriühingu bilansis;
(i) a foundation, legal arrangement or trust under which corporate debt is issued and recognised in the balance sheet of a company listed on a recognised stock exchange;
ii) isiku surma puhul kas testamendijärgselt või seadusjärgselt tekkivat fondi, õiguslikku üksust või usaldusühingut;
(ii) a foundation, legal arrangement or trust arising on the death of any person either testate or intestate;
iii) mis tahes liikmesriigi õiguses vara ühisomandi puhul nõutavat fondi, õiguslikku üksust või usaldusühingut;
(iii) a foundation, legal arrangement or trust required by the law of any Member State for the joint ownership of property,
However, this was not the intention of the drafters, as any money-laundering risk in this area is already managed by financial services regulation, which should not be duplicated.
However, this was not the intention of the drafters, as any money-laundering risk in this area is already managed by financial services regulation, which should not be duplicated.
Without this amendment, the Directive could be highly disruptive to bond markets in the European Union.
Without this amendment, the Directive could be highly disruptive to bond markets in the European Union.
The Directive extends money-laundering requirements to trusts.
The Directive extends money-laundering requirements to trusts.
Succession arrangements in other Member States are not covered by the proposed new directive and this clarification ensures that the UK and Ireland are treated in the same way as other Member States.
Succession arrangements in other Member States are not covered by the proposed new directive and this clarification ensures that the UK and Ireland are treated in the same way as other Member States.
A purchase or sale of land will already be subject to existing anti-money-laundering controls.
A purchase or sale of land will already be subject to existing anti-money-laundering controls.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et rahapesu on kuritegu .
Member States shall ensure that money laundering is a criminal offence .
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamine on kuriteod .
Member States shall ensure that money laundering and terrorist financing are criminal offences .
Artikli 1 lõike 2 esimese lõigu punkt d
Article 1, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1, point (d)
Terrorist financing must be removed from the definition of money laundering and defined separately.
Terrorist financing must be removed from the definition of money laundering and defined separately.
Even if the scope of the Directive quite properly includes terrorist financing, the definition of the latter should be distinct from money laundering.
Even if the scope of the Directive quite properly includes terrorist financing, the definition of the latter should be distinct from money laundering.
Käesolevas direktiivis käsitletakse terrorismi rahastamisena järgmist tegevust, kui see on toime pandud tahtlikult:
For the purposes of this Directive, the following conduct, when committed intentionally, shall be regarded as terrorist financing:
a) seadusliku vara hankimine või kogumine ükskõik mis viisil, kui seda vara kavatsetakse kasutada osaliselt või täielikult terrorismi toetuseks või kui teatakse sellisest kavatsusest;
(a) the provision or collection of lawful property, by any means, with the intention that it should be used or in the knowledge that it is to be used, in full or in part, for terrorism;
b) eespool nimetatud tegudes osalemine, kokkuleppimine nende toimepanemises, nende toimepanemise katsed ning nendele kaasaaitamine ja kihutamine või nende soodustamine või nendeks nõuandmine.
(b) participation in, conspiracy to commit, attempts to commit and aiding, abetting, facilitating and counselling the commission of any of the actions mentioned above.
The funding of terrorist activities must therefore be defined in a separate paragraph in Article 1.
The funding of terrorist activities must therefore be defined in a separate paragraph in Article 1.
Definitions from the Commission proposal (see Article 1(2), paragraph 1, introduction and subparagraphs (d) and (e) have been incorporated; letter e has been shortened as appropriate.
Definitions from the Commission proposal (see Article 1(2), paragraph 1, introduction and subparagraphs (d) and (e) have been incorporated; letter e has been shortened as appropriate.
Artikli 1 lõige 2 b (uus)
Article 1, paragraph 2 b (new)
Rahapesu hõlmab kuritegelikust tegevusest saadud vara omandamist, valdamist või kasutamist vastavalt lõike 2 punktile c, sealhulgas juhul, kui kuritegeliku tegevuse sooritas asjaomane isik ilma edasiste tehinguteta.
Money laundering shall include the acquisition, possession or use of property derived from criminal activity, in accordance with point (c) in paragraph 2, including in circumstances where the criminal activity was carried out by the person concerned without further transactions.
This proposed amendment would clarify the definition of 'money laundering' contained in Article 1 of the proposed Directive, which has been carried forward from the Second Directive and includes the acquisition, possession or use of property derived from criminal activity.
This proposed amendment would clarify the definition of 'money laundering' contained in Article 1 of the proposed Directive, which has been carried forward from the Second Directive and includes the acquisition, possession or use of property derived from criminal activity.
Artikli 2 lõike 1 punkti 3 alapunkti b sissejuhatav osa
Article 2, paragraph 1, point (3), point (b), introductory part
b) notarid ja teised sõltumatutel juriidilistel ametikohtadel töötajad, kui nad osalevad oma kliendi heaks või tema nimel mõnes finants- või kinnisvaratehingus või aitavad kliendil ellu viia või planeerida tehingut , mis puudutab:
(b) notaries and other independent legal professionals, when they participate, whether by acting on behalf of and for their client in any financial or real estate transaction, or by assisting in the planning or execution of transactions for their client concerning the:
b) notarid ja teised sõltumatutel juriidilistel ametikohtadel töötajad, kui sooritatakse sularahamakse vähemalt 15 000 euro väärtuses, olenemata sellest, kas tehing sooritatakse ühekordse maksena või erinevate maksetena, mis näivad olevat seotud, kuid ainult siis, kui nad osalevad oma kliendi heaks või tema nimel mõnes finants- või kinnisvaratehingus või aitavad kliendil ellu viia või planeerida finantstehingut , mis puudutab:
(b) notaries and other independent legal professionals, whenever payment is made in cash and in an amount of EUR 15 000 or more, whether the transaction is carried out in a single operation or in several operations which appear to be linked, but only when they participate, whether by acting on behalf of and for their client in any financial or real estate transaction, or by assisting in the planning or execution of financial transactions for their client concerning the:
The amendment brings notaries and legal professionals into line with the generality of service providers.
The amendment brings notaries and legal professionals into line with the generality of service providers.
Liikmesriigid võivad otsustada direktiivi mitte kohaldada finantseerimisasutuste puhul, mis osalevad finantstegevuses väga piiratud mahus või üksikutel juhtudel ja mille puhul rahapesuoht on väike.
Member States may decide not to apply this Directive in the case of financial institutions which engage in a financial activity on an occasional or very limited basis and where there is little risk of money laundering occurring.
Liikmesriigid võivad otsustada direktiivi mitte kohaldada finantseerimisasutuste puhul, mis osalevad finantstegevuses , või notarite ja teiste sõltumatutel juriidilistel ametikohtadel töötajate puhul, kes osalevad artikli 2 lõike 1 punkti 3 alapunkti b alapunktides i kuni v loetletud tegevuses väga piiratud mahus või üksikutel juhtudel ja mille puhul rahapesuoht on väike.
Member States may decide not to apply this Directive in the case of financial institutions which engage in a financial activity , or notaries and other independent legal professionals who engage in an activity listed in Article 2(1)(3)(b)(i) to (v), on an occasional or very limited basis and where there is little risk of money laundering occurring.
In order to place legal professionals on an equal footing with financial institutions Member States should be able to decide not to apply the Directive to legal professionals who are engaged in the activities mentioned in Article 2(1) only on an occasional or limited basis and where there is little risk of money laundering.
In order to place legal professionals on an equal footing with financial institutions Member States should be able to decide not to apply the Directive to legal professionals who are engaged in the activities mentioned in Article 2(1) only on an occasional or limited basis and where there is little risk of money laundering.
Liikmesriigid ei kohalda käesolevat direktiivi notarite ja teiste sõltumatutel juriidilistel ametikohtadel töötajate puhul, kui viimased tegutsevad oma kutsealal, mille suhtes kehtib ametisaladuse hoidmise kohustus või juriidilisel ametikohal töötajate suhtes kohaldatav privileeg, eriti kui nad saavad teavet, selgitades oma kliendi õiguslikku olukorda või kaitstes või esindades kõnealust klienti kohtu-, haldus-, vahekohtu- või lepitusmenetluses või nendega seoses, sealhulgas juhul, kui nad annavad kõnealuste menetluste algatamist või vältimist käsitlevat nõu, olenemata sellest, kas kõnealune teave on saadud enne sellist menetlust, selle ajal või pärast seda.
Member States shall not apply this Directive to notaries and other independent legal professionals in the exercise of their professional activity where the same is subject to professional secrecy or legal professional privilege, in particular when they obtain information in the course of ascertaining the legal position for their client or performing their task of defending or representing that client in or in relation to judicial, administrative, arbitration or mediation proceedings, including advising on the institution or avoidance of such proceedings, whether such information is received or obtained before, during or after such proceedings.
The ambit of the third Directive is strictly limited to lawyers as natural persons when they are acting for their client or when assisting him/her in the planning or execution of transactions concerning five definite items (Article 2(1 (3)(b)).
The ambit of the third Directive is strictly limited to lawyers as natural persons when they are acting for their client or when assisting him/her in the planning or execution of transactions concerning five definite items (Article 2(1 (3)(b)).
Therefore, lawyers should not be subject to due diligence or reporting of suspicious transactions falling outside the above-mentioned ambit of the provision.
Therefore, lawyers should not be subject to due diligence or reporting of suspicious transactions falling outside the above-mentioned ambit of the provision.
In addition, since one of the reasons advanced to justify the 3 rd Directive is to bring EU legislation into line with the Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Money Laundering certain words need to be added to properly bring the directive into line with these Recommendations.
In addition, since one of the reasons advanced to justify the 3 rd Directive is to bring EU legislation into line with the Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Money Laundering certain words need to be added to properly bring the directive into line with these Recommendations.
The amended wording of Article 20(2) has been moved to Article 2 because it is felt to be confusing to have the ambit of lawyers’ reporting duties in two different places in the Directive.
The amended wording of Article 20(2) has been moved to Article 2 because it is felt to be confusing to have the ambit of lawyers’ reporting duties in two different places in the Directive.
Artikli 3 punkti 7 alapunkt f
Article 3, point 7, point (f)
f) kõik õigusrikkumised, mille eest määratava karistuse ülemmääraks on üle aasta kestev vabadusekaotus või vabadust piirav julgeolekumeede või nendes riikides, mille õigussüsteemides on kehtestatud õigusrikkumiste alammäär, vähemalt kuus kuud kestva vabadusekaotuse või vabadust piirava julgeolekumeetmega karistatavad õigusrikkumised.
(f) all offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a maximum of more than one year or, as regards those States which have a minimum threshold for offences in their legal system, all offences punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a minimum of more than six months.
f) kõik õigusrikkumised, mis kuuluvad eespool punktides a kuni e loetletud valdkonda ja mille eest määratava karistuse ülemmääraks on üle aasta kestev vabadusekaotus või vabadust piirav julgeolekumeede või nendes riikides, mille õigussüsteemides on kehtestatud õigusrikkumiste alammäär, vähemalt kuus kuud kestva vabadusekaotuse või vabadust piirava julgeolekumeetmega karistatavad õigusrikkumised.
(f) all offences which fall within the ambit of (a) to (e) above and are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a maximum of more than one year or, as regards those States which have a minimum threshold for offences in their legal system, all offences punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a minimum of more than six months.
The current proposed definition of a serious crime founded on the length of the sentence of imprisonment is unworkable on an EU-wide basis and will not provide an appropriate level of harmonisation or application of the directive.
The current proposed definition of a serious crime founded on the length of the sentence of imprisonment is unworkable on an EU-wide basis and will not provide an appropriate level of harmonisation or application of the directive.
In addition the widening of the scope in the manner proposed would potentially overwhelm the system.
In addition the widening of the scope in the manner proposed would potentially overwhelm the system.
The amendment seeks to concentrate on the key offences likely to be related to money laundering.
The amendment seeks to concentrate on the key offences likely to be related to money laundering.
a) füüsiline isik, kes lõplikult omab otseselt või kaudselt või kontrollib 10 või enamat protsenti juriidilise isiku aktsiatest või hääleõigusest või kes muul viisil omab olulist mõju sellise juriidilise isiku juhtimise üle, kes ei ole börsil ametlikult noteeritud ettevõte ja kelle suhtes ei kohaldata avalikustamisnõudeid ühenduse õigusaktide alusel ega samaväärseid rahvusvahelisi standardeid ;
(a) the natural person who ultimately, directly or indirectly, owns or controls 10 % or more of the shares or of the voting rights of a legal person or who otherwise exercises a comparable influence over the management of a legal person, other than a company listed on an official stock exchange that is subject to disclosure requirements consistent with Community legislation or subject to equivalent international standards ;
a) füüsiline isik, kes valdab otseselt 25 või enamat protsenti esitajale emiteeritud aktsiatest või hääleõigustest ettevõttes, mis ei ole ametlikul börsil väärtpaberite ringlusse lubatud, ning kelle isik ja osalus on ametlikult avaldatud ;
(a) the natural person who directly holds 25% or more of the shares issued to the bearer or voting rights of a company that has not been admitted for dealings on an official stock exchange and whose identity and shareholdings have been published officially ;
The threshold of 10% is neither adequate nor practicable.
The threshold of 10% is neither adequate nor practicable.
This threshold should be increased to 25%.
This threshold should be increased to 25%.
Furthermore, institutions and persons covered by this Directive do not have access to public registers to obtain the identity and to verify the identity of shareholders in non-listed companies and other legal arrangements.
Furthermore, institutions and persons covered by this Directive do not have access to public registers to obtain the identity and to verify the identity of shareholders in non-listed companies and other legal arrangements.
The identification and verification requirements regarding the beneficial owner should therefore be subject to access to publicly available sources of information (e.g. register or gazette).
The identification and verification requirements regarding the beneficial owner should therefore be subject to access to publicly available sources of information (e.g. register or gazette).
b) füüsiline isik, kes on otseselt või kaudselt fondi , usaldusühingu või muu sarnase õigusliku üksuse varast 10 v õi enama protsendi tegelik omanik või kes omab mõju võrreldava osa üle fondi, usaldusühingu või muu sarnase õigusliku üksuse varast, kui see ei ole börsil ametlikult noteeritud ettevõte ja selle suhtes ei kohaldata avalikustamisnõudeid ühenduse õigusaktide alusel ega samaväärseid rahvusvahelisi standardeid;
(b) the natural person who is ultimate beneficiary , directly or indirectly, of 10 % or more of the property of a foundation , a trust or similar legal arrangement or who exercises influence over a comparable quantity of the property of a foundation, a trust or a similar legal arrangement, other than a company listed on an official stock exchange that is subject to disclosure requirements consistent with Community legislation or subject to equivalent international standards ;
b) füüsiline isik, kes on fondi või usaldusühingu varast vähemalt 25 protsendi otsene omanik ja kelle isik on õigusliku üksusega liitumisel ametlikult avaldatud ;
(b) the natural person who is the direct beneficiary of at least 25% of the property of a foundation or a trust and whose identity has been published officially at the time of his entering into the legal arrangement;
Therefore, the identification and verification requirements regarding the beneficial owner should be subject to access to publicly available sources of information (e.g. register or gazette).
Therefore, the identification and verification requirements regarding the beneficial owner should be subject to access to publicly available sources of information (e.g. register or gazette).
10) poliitiliselt silmapaistvad isikud – füüsilised isikud, kes täidavad või on täitnud olulisi avalikke funktsioone ja kelle mahukate või keeruliste finants- või äritehingutega võib kaasneda suurem rahapesu oht, samuti selliste isikute lähisugulased või lähedased kaastöötajad ;
(10) ‘politically exposed persons’ means natural persons who are or have been entrusted with prominent public functions and whose substantial or complex financial or business transactions may represent an enhanced money laundering risk and close family members or close associates of such persons;
10) poliitiliselt silmapaistvad isikud – füüsilised isikud, kes täidavad või on täitnud olulisi avalikke funktsioone ja kelle mahukate või keeruliste finants- või äritehingutega võib kaasneda olukord, kus on suurem maine- ja rahapesu oht, samuti isikud, keda loetakse selliste isikute lähisugulasteks või lähedasteks kaastöötajateks ;
(10) ‘politically exposed persons’ means natural persons who are or have been entrusted with prominent public functions and whose substantial or complex financial or business transactions may represent situations of enhanced reputational and money-laundering risk and those identified as close family members or close associates of such persons;
11) ärisuhe – äriline, ametialane või kaubandussuhe, millest kontakti loomise hetkel oodatakse teatavat kestvust;
(11) ‘ Business relationship’ means a business, professional or commercial relationship which is expected, at the time when the contact is established, to have an element of duration;
11) ärisuhe – äriline, ametialane või kaubandussuhe, mis on tihedalt seotud asutuse või isiku, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse käesolevat direktiivi, vastava tegevusega ning millest kontakti loomise hetkel oodatakse teatavat kestvust;
(11) ‘ business relationship’ means a business, professional or commercial relationship which is closely connected with the corresponding activity carried out by the institution or person subject to this Directive and which is expected, at the time when the contact is established, to have an element of duration;
The current definition is far from precise; it should, however, include a more targeted reference to the fact that the relevant 'business relationships' are only those specifically connected with the typical activities carried out by the institutions and persons which have to fulfil the obligations laid down by the Directive.
The current definition is far from precise; it should, however, include a more targeted reference to the fact that the relevant 'business relationships' are only those specifically connected with the typical activities carried out by the institutions and persons which have to fulfil the obligations laid down by the Directive.
Artikli 3 punkt 12 a (uus)
Article 3, point 12 a (new)