natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(2) Oma erakorralisel istungil Tamperes 15. ja 16. oktoobril 1999 otsustas Euroopa Ülemkogu püüelda sellise Euroopa ühise varjupaigasüsteemi loomise poole, mis põhineb pagulaste seisundit käsitleva 28. juuli 1951. aasta Genfi konventsiooni, nagu seda on täiendatud 31. jaanuari 1967. aasta New Yorgi protokolliga (“Genfi konventsioon”), täielikul kohaldamisel, millega kinnitatakse mittetagasisaatmise põhimõtet ja tagatakse, et kedagi ei sunnita naasma tagakiusajate küüsi .
(2) The European Council, at its special meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, agreed to work towards establishing a Common European Asylum System, based on the full and inclusive application of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 ("Geneva Convention"), thus affirming the principle of non-refoulement and ensuring that nobody is sent back to persecution .
(2) Oma erakorralisel istungil Tamperes 15. ja 16. oktoobril 1999 otsustas Euroopa Ülemkogu püüelda sellise Euroopa ühise varjupaigasüsteemi loomise poole, mis põhineb pagulaste seisundit käsitleva 28. juuli 1951. aasta Genfi konventsiooni, nagu seda on täiendatud 31. jaanuari 1967. aasta New Yorgi protokolliga (“Genfi konventsioon”), täielikul kohaldamisel, millega kinnitatakse mittetagasisaatmise põhimõtet ja tagatakse, et kedagi ei sunnita naasma riikidesse ega territooriumidele, kus võidakse ohustada nende elu või vabadust .
(2) The European Council, at its special meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, agreed to work towards establishing a Common European Asylum System, based on the full and inclusive application of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 ("Geneva Convention"), thus affirming the principle of non-refoulement and ensuring that nobody is sent back to countries or territories where their life or freedom could be at risk .
It is necessary to stress the principle of non-refoulement, as the cornerstone of the Common European Asylum System.
It is necessary to stress the principle of non-refoulement, as the cornerstone of the Common European Asylum System.
(3 a) 4. ja 5. novembri 2004. aasta kohtumisel Haagis kinnitas Euroopa Ülemkogu Tamperes vastu võetud lähenemise ja nõustus 2010. aastaks looma ühise varjupaigamenetluse ning ühtse pagulasstaatuse neile, kelle varjupaigataotlus rahuldatakse ning kellele pakutakse subsidiaarset kaitset.
(3a) The European Council, at its meeting in Den Haag on 4 and 5 November 2004, confirmed the approach adopted in Tampere and agreed on the establishment of a common asylum procedure and uniform status for those who are granted asylum or subsidiary protection, by 2010.
It is important to mention the Den Haag Programme, which is the follow up of Tampere.
It is important to mention the Den Haag Programme, which is the follow up of Tampere.
(5) Käesoleva direktiivi peaeesmärk on kehtestada Euroopa Ühenduses miinimumraamistik pagulasseisundi omistamise ja äravõtmise menetluste kohta.
(5) The main objective of this Directive is to introduce a minimum framework in the European Community on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status.
(5) Käesoleva direktiivi peaeesmärk on kehtestada Euroopa Ühenduses miinimumraamistik pagulasseisundi omistamise ja äravõtmise menetluste kohta, tagades et ükski liikmesriik ei saada varjupaigataotlejat ühelgi viisil riigist välja või tagasi piirkonda, kus tema rassi, soo, usu, rahvuse, keele, seksuaalse orientatsiooni, sotsiaalsesse gruppi kuulumise, poliitiliste vaadete või vähemuse hulka kuulumise tõttu on ohus tema elu või vabadus, vastavalt rahvusvahelistele standarditele, eriti pagulaste seisundit käsitlevale 1951. aasta Genfi konventsioonile ning Tampere varjupaiga-alastele lõppjäreldustele.
(5) The main objective of this Directive is to introduce a minimum framework in the European Community on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status, ensuring that no Member State expels or returns an applicant for asylum in any manner whatsoever to the frontier of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, sex, religion, nationality, language, sexual orientation, membership of a particular social group or political opinion or minority, keeping in line with international standards, in particular the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees and the Tampere conclusions on asylum.
The non - refoulement principle is the cornerstone of the Geneva Convention and of the Tampere conclusions on asylum and should be mentioned explicitly in the text from the beginning as a general rule.
The non - refoulement principle is the cornerstone of the Geneva Convention and of the Tampere conclusions on asylum and should be mentioned explicitly in the text from the beginning as a general rule.
(8) Käesolevas direktiivis austatakse põhiõigusi ja peetakse kinni iseäranis Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartaga tunnustatud põhimõtetest.
(8) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
(8) Käesolevas direktiivis austatakse põhiõigusi ja peetakse kinni iseäranis Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartaga tunnustatud põhimõtetest, kui ühenduse õiguse üldpõhimõtetest ning kõikidest olemasolevatest rahvusvahelistest kohustustest, eriti Genfi konventsioonist.
(8) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as general principles of Community law, and by all the existing international obligations, in particular the Geneva Convention .
The necessity to respect all existing international law, the Charter and the general principles of Community law needs to be underscored and to be applied to the entire Directive.
The necessity to respect all existing international law, the Charter and the general principles of Community law needs to be underscored and to be applied to the entire Directive.
(9) Käesoleva direktiivi kohaldamisalasse kuuluvate isikute kohtlemise osas on liikmesriigid seotud kohustustega, mis tulenevad rahvusvahelistest õigusaktidest, millega nad on ühinenud ja mis keelustavad diskrimineerimise.
(9) With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party and which prohibit discrimination.
(9) Käesoleva direktiivi kohaldamisalasse kuuluvate isikute kohtlemise osas on liikmesriigid seotud kohustustega, mis tulenevad rahvusvahelistest õigusaktidest, millega nad on ühinenud ja mis keelustavad igasuguse diskrimineerimise.
(9) With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party and which prohibit all forms of discrimination.
It needs to be stated explicitly that all forms of discrimination are prohibited in the application of the Directive.
It needs to be stated explicitly that all forms of discrimination are prohibited in the application of the Directive.
(11) Varjupaigataotluste kohta võimalikult kiiresti otsuse tegemine on nii liikmesriikide kui ka varjupaigataotlejate huvides.
(11) It is in the interest of both Member States and applicants for asylum to decide as soon as possible on applications for asylum.
Varjupaigataotluste läbivaatamine korraldatakse liikmesriikide äranägemisel, et nad saaksid vastavalt oma siseriiklikele vajadustele vaadata mis tahes taotluse läbi eelisjärjekorras või selle läbivaatamist kiirendada, võttes arvesse käesoleva direktiivi nõudeid.
The organisation of the processing of applications for asylum is left to the discretion of Member States, so that they may, in accordance with their national needs, prioritise or accelerate the processing of any application, taking into account the standards in this Directive.
(11) Varjupaigataotluste kohta võimalikult kiiresti otsuse tegemine on nii liikmesriikide kui ka varjupaigataotlejate huvides ning seetõttu on vaja kiireid ja tõhusaid menetlusi, mis ei kestaks rohkem kui kuus kuud.
(11) It is in the interest of both Member States and applicants for asylum to decide as soon as possible on applications for asylum , and there therefore need to be fast and efficient procedures which should not take longer than 6 months .
Fast and effective procedures are crucial.
Fast and effective procedures are crucial.
Given the enormous variations in time-periods between Member States, it is essential to establish a common average, since this will create fairer conditions for both asylum seekers and the Member States in terms of an equitable division of responsibilities.
Given the enormous variations in time-periods between Member States, it is essential to establish a common average, since this will create fairer conditions for both asylum seekers and the Member States in terms of an equitable division of responsibilities.
(13) Genfi konventsiooni artikli 1 tähenduses pagulastena kaitset vajavate isikute nõuetekohase tunnustamise huvides peaks igal taotlejal olema teatavate eranditega juurdepääs menetlusele, võimalus teha koostööd ja nõuetekohaselt suhelda pädevate asutustega, et esitada oma juhtumi kohta asjassepuutuvaid fakte, ning küllaldased protseduurilised tagatised oma juhtumi jätkuvaks menetlemiseks kõikides etappides.
(13) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, subject to certain exceptions, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to co-operate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and sufficient procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case at and throughout all stages of the procedure.
Lisaks sellele peaks varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise menetlus üldjuhul andma taotlejale vähemalt õiguse jääda riiki, kuni menetlev asutus teeb otsuse; õiguse kasutada tõlgi teenuseid oma juhtumi esitamisel, kui asutused teda küsitlevad; võimaluse suhelda oma nimel ÜRO pagulaste ülemkomissari esindajaga või tema nimel tegutsevate organisatsioonidega; õiguse saada kohaselt teada otsusest, selle faktilisest ja juriidilisest põhjendusest; võimaluse konsulteerida õigusnõustajaga või muu nõustajaga; ning õiguse saada informatsiooni oma juriidilise staatuse kohta menetluse otsustavatel hetkedel keeles, mille puhul on põhjust oletada, et ta sellest aru saab .
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should normally provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can reasonably be supposed to understand .
(13) Genfi konventsiooni artikli 1 tähenduses pagulastena kaitset vajavate isikute nõuetekohase tunnustamise huvides peaks igal taotlejal olema juurdepääs menetlusele, võimalus teha koostööd ja nõuetekohaselt suhelda pädevate asutustega, et esitada oma juhtumi kohta asjassepuutuvaid fakte, ning protseduurilised tagatised oma juhtumi jätkuvaks menetlemiseks kõikides etappides.
(13) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to co-operate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case at and throughout all stages of the procedure.
Lisaks sellele peaks varjupaigataotluse läbivaatamise menetlus andma taotlejale vähemalt õiguse jääda riiki, kuni menetlev asutus teeb otsuse; õiguse kasutada tõlgi teenuseid oma juhtumi esitamisel, kui asutused teda küsitlevad; võimaluse suhelda oma nimel ÜRO pagulaste ülemkomissari esindajaga või tema nimel tegutsevate organisatsioonidega; õiguse saada kohaselt teada otsusest, selle faktilisest ja juriidilisest põhjendusest; võimaluse konsulteerida õigusnõustajaga või muu nõustajaga; ning õiguse saada informatsiooni oma juriidilise staatuse kohta menetluse otsustavatel hetkedel keeles, millest ta aru saab .
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she understands .
"On põhjust oletada" kustutamine kehtib kogu tekstis.
(The deletion of "can reasonably be supposed to" applies throughout the text.
Käesoleva muudatusettepaneku vastuvõtmise korral tuleb sisse viia vastavad muudatused kogu tekstis).
Adopting this amendment will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
The principles of effective remedy should always apply.
The principles of effective remedy should always apply.
Asylum seekers should be informed in a language that they understand, not in a language they may reasonably be supposed to understand.
Asylum seekers should be informed in a language that they understand, not in a language they may reasonably be supposed to understand.
(14) Lisaks tuleks saatjata alaealiste kohta nende haavatavuse tõttu sätestada eraldi protseduurilised tagatised.
(14) In addition, specific procedural guarantees for unaccompanied minors should be laid down, because of their vulnerability.
Antud kontekstis peaksid liikmesriigid seadma esikohale lapse parimad huvid.
In this context, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration of Member States.
(14) Lisaks tuleks saatjata laste kohta nende vastuvõtlikkuse tõttu sätestada eraldi protseduurilised tagatised.
(14) In addition, specific procedural guarantees for unaccompanied children should be laid down, because of their vulnerability.
Antud kontekstis peaksid liikmesriigid kooskõlas lapse õiguse konventsiooni artikliga 3 kogu varjupaigataotluse menetluse jooksul seadma esikohale lapse parimad huvid.
In this context, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration of Member States throughout the whole asylum procedure, consistent with Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) .
(Antud muudatus kehtib kogu tekstis.
(This amendment applies throughout the text.
Selle vastuvõtmise korral tuleb sisse viia vastavad muudatused kogu tekstis).
Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
It is better to use the term "child" instead of "minor", in line with the terminology of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
It is better to use the term "child" instead of "minor", in line with the terminology of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
(16) Paljud varjupaigataotlused tehakse piiril või liikmesriigi transiitalas enne taotleja riiki lubamise otsust.
(16) Many asylum applications are made at the border or in a transit zone of a Member State prior to a decision on the entry of the applicant.
Liikmesriigid peaksid suutma kohandada olemasolevaid menetlusi piiril vastavalt selliste taotlejate eriolukordadele.
Member States should be able to keep existing procedures adapted to the specific situation of these applicants at the border.
Määratleda tuleks ühised eeskirjad võimalike erandite jaoks, mis tehakse sellistes olukordades varjupaigataotlejatele üldiselt antavates tagatistes .
Common rules should be defined on possible exceptions made in these circumstances to the guarantees normally enjoyed by applicants .
Piirimenetlusi tuleks peamiselt kohaldada nende taotlejate suhtes, kes ei vasta liikmesriigi territooriumile sisenemise tingimustele.
Border procedures should mainly apply to those applicants who do not meet the conditions for entry into the territory of the Member States.
The principle of non-discrimination requires that all asylum-seeker, irrespective of whether they apply at the border or inside the country, benefit from the same basic principles and guarantees.
The principle of non-discrimination requires that all asylum-seeker, irrespective of whether they apply at the border or inside the country, benefit from the same basic principles and guarantees.
Here is no reason for requirements of due process of law in asylum cases submitted at the border to be less than for those submitted within the territory.
Here is no reason for requirements of due process of law in asylum cases submitted at the border to be less than for those submitted within the territory.
(17 a) Tunnistades inimkaubanduse olemasolu ja võttes arvesse varjupaigataotleja huve, ei tohi varjupaigataotlejat taotlemisel mingil viisil diskrimineerida selle tõttu, et ta sisenes liikmesriiki sellisel viisil.
(17a) Acknowledging the existence of trafficking in human beings and having regard to the best interests of the asylum applicant, he/she must not be discriminated against in any way in his/her application for having entered the Member State in such a manner.
18) Arvestades kolmandate riikide kodanike ja kodakondsuseta isikute pagulaseks tunnistamise ühtlustamise taset, tuleks kehtestada ühised tingimused kolmandate riikide tunnistamiseks turvalisteks päritoluriikideks.
(18) Given the level of harmonisation achieved on the qualification of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees, common criteria for designating third countries as safe countries of origin should be established.
18) Arvestades kolmandate riikide kodanike ja kodakondsuseta isikute pagulaseks tunnistamise ühtlustamise taset, tuleks kehtestada ühised tingimused kolmandate riikide tunnistamiseks turvalisteks päritoluriikideks ning tuleb tagada nõuetekohane ja tõhus hindamine ja rakendamine.
(18) Given the level of harmonisation achieved on the qualification of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees, common criteria for designating third countries as safe countries of origin should be established and it must be ensured that evaluation and implementation are carried out correctly and efficiently .
Optimum results will only be achieved on the basis of proper implementation.
Optimum results will only be achieved on the basis of proper implementation.
(19) Kui nõukogu on veendunud, et päritoluriik on need tingimused täitnud, ning on seejärel lisanud selle riigi käesoleva direktiivi kohaselt vastuvõetavale turvaliste päritoluriikide ühisesse miinimum nimekirja, peaksid liikmesriigid olema kohustatud läbi vaatama avaldused selle riigi kodakondsusega isikutelt või kodakondsuseta isikutelt, kelle peamine elukoht oli varem selles riigis, tuginedes sellele, et selle riigi eeldatav turvalisus on vaidlustatav.
(19) Where the Council has satisfied itself that those criteria are met in relation to a particular country of origin, and has consequently included it in the minimum common list of safe countries of origin to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, Member States should be obliged to consider applications of persons with the nationality of that country, or of stateless persons formerly habitually resident in that country, on the basis of the rebuttable presumption of the safety of that country.
Pidades silmas turvaliste päritoluriikide määratlemise poliitilist tähtsust, arvestades eelkõige päritoluriigi inimõiguste olukorra hinnangu mõjusid ja selle mõjusid Euroopa Liidu välispoliitikale, peaks nõukogu mis tahes otsused nimekirja koostamise või muutmise kohta tegema pärast konsulteerimist Euroopa Parlamendiga.
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list , after consultation of the European Parliament .
(19) Kui nõukogu on veendunud, et päritoluriik on need tingimused täitnud, ning on seejärel lisanud selle riigi käesoleva direktiivi kohaselt vastuvõetavale turvaliste päritoluriikide ühisesse nimekirja, võivad liikmesriigid läbi vaadata avaldused selle riigi kodakondsusega isikutelt või kodakondsuseta isikutelt, kelle peamine elukoht oli varem selles riigis, tuginedes sellele, et selle riigi eeldatav turvalisus on vaidlustatav.
(19) Where the Council has satisfied itself that those criteria are met in relation to a particular country of origin, and has consequently included it in the common list of safe countries of origin to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, Member States may consider applications of persons with the nationality of that country, or of stateless persons formerly habitually resident in that country, on the basis of the rebuttable presumption of the safety of that country.
Pidades silmas turvaliste päritoluriikide määratlemise poliitilist tähtsust, arvestades eelkõige päritoluriigi inimõiguste olukorra hinnangu mõjusid ja selle mõjusid Euroopa Liidu välispoliitikale, peaks nõukogu Euroopa Parlamendiga kaasotsustamisel tegema otsuseid nimekirja koostamise või muutmise kohta.
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council , in co-decision with the European Parliament, should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list.
The Rapporteur considers that the Member States who have not a list on safe countries should not be obliged to adopt it.
The Rapporteur considers that the Member States who have not a list on safe countries should not be obliged to adopt it.
Moreover the common list at European level should be the only list allowed, not a minimum one allowing Member States to have national lists.
Moreover the common list at European level should be the only list allowed, not a minimum one allowing Member States to have national lists.
The list, which will be established not by this Directive, but by a further legislative act, shall be agreed in co-decision by the Council and the European Parliament.
The list, which will be established not by this Directive, but by a further legislative act, shall be agreed in co-decision by the Council and the European Parliament.
In fact, according to the EC Treaty (article 67-§5, first indent), once the Council has adopted the legislation defining the common rules and basic principles on asylum, the procedure to apply is the co-decision one.
In fact, according to the EC Treaty (article 67-§5, first indent), once the Council has adopted the legislation defining the common rules and basic principles on asylum, the procedure to apply is the co-decision one.