natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. võttes arvesse kaitsealaste riigihangete majanduslikku olulisust Euroopa siseturul, liikmesriikide pingelist eelarveseisu, eelarvekulutuste piiramisi, mida liikmesriigid peavad ette võtma ning kaitsekuludest tingitud olulist koormust maksumaksjatele;
D. taking account of the economic importance of defence procurement within the European internal market, the tight budgetary position in the Member States, the restriction in terms of budgetary expenditure imposed on the Member States and the considerable burden which defence expenditure places on taxpayers,
E. olles teadlik kaitseturgude eripäradest, arvestades iseäranis riigi keskset rolli, relvahangete olulisust julgeolekule ja killustunud turustruktuuride eripärasid, nagu näiteks väga piiratud arvu pakkujaid ja nõudlust kuni monopoolsete seisunditeni välja;
E. conscious of the specific features of defence markets, in particular with regard to the dominant role of the state, the importance of armaments procurement in terms of security and the special nature of fragmented market structures, e.g. the very limited number of suppliers and demand and even monopolies;
F. arvestades, et killustunud relvastusturg Euroopas on ka üks Euroopa sõjalise võimsuse nõrkuse põhjus,
F. whereas the fragmented nature of the armaments market in Europe is one of the causes of weakness in terms of Europe's military capabilities,
G. tõdedes, et relvastusturgude hermeetiline eraldatus on ka puuduliku standardimise põhjuseks ning on toonud seega kaasa süsteemide puuduliku koostöövõime Euroopas, raskendades koostööd rahvusvahelistel operatsioonidel;
G. whereas the complete fragmentation of armaments markets is also the cause of a lack of standardisation, which has led to a lack of interoperability between systems in Europe, making cooperation in international operations more difficult,
H. arvestades, et 25 erineva hanke-eeskirja kehtimine on takistuseks Euroopa võimsuse tegevuskava ( European Capabilities Action Plan ) elluviimisel;
H. whereas the fact that 25 different sets of rules on procurement are in force constitutes an obstacle to implementation of the European Capabilities Action Plan,
I. võttes arvesse asjaolu, et relvastuse ostjad on rõhuvas enamuses eranditult 25 liikmesriigi valitsused, kusjuures neist kuus riiki ostavad ära 90% vastavast varustusest ning on osaliselt ise kaitsetööstuse osanikud,
I. whereas the relevant armaments purchasers are solely the governments of the 25 Member States, six of which account for 90% of armaments purchases and in some cases have shareholdings in the armaments industry.
3. kutsub üles liikmesriike ja tööstust loobuma aastakümneid kestnud piirangutest üleeuroopalisele relvastusturule ning alustama innovatiivse strateegiaga uut koostööetappi;
Calls on the Member States and the industry to abandon the reservations which for decades have stood in the way of a European defence market and to set in train a new phase of cooperation based on an innovative strategy;
5. nõustub komisjoniga, et Euroopa kaitseturg on vajalik selleks, et vähendada sõjalisi kulutusi ning muuta sõjaliste vahendite tootmine Euroopa maksumaksja huvides kulusäästlikumaks;
Agrees with the Commission that a European defence market is necessary to reduce military expenditure costs and make the production of military goods more cost-effective in the interest of the European taxpayer;
7. rõhutab, et tööstuse suurenenud tootlikkus peab suurendama missioonil olevate Euroopa sõdurite kaitset ning Euroopa kodanike kaitset;
Emphasises that the increased efficiency of the industry should serve to protect European soldiers in action and benefit European citizens;
10. on arvamusel, et komisjon peaks vastu võtma tõlgendusteatise, mis kajastaks tema otsustavust artikli 296 kuritarvitamise lõpetamisel, ning hakkama samaaegselt välja töötama uut kaitse eripäradele kohandatud direktiivi relvade, laskemoona ja sõjavarustuse riigihangete kohta vastavalt artiklile 296;
Believes that the Commission should both adopt an Interpretative Communication reflecting its determination to stop the misuse of Article 296 and start to develop, in parallel, a new directive tailored to the specific features of defence for the purposes of the procurement of arms, ammunition and war material subject to Article 296;
15. peab vajalikuks uue direktiivi puhul hangete korda arvestades kaaluda nii kohustuslikke kui ka valikulisi vahendeid; arvab, et rõhk tuleks asetada suurema läbipaistvuse ja õigluse saavutamisele riigihankelepingute sõlmimisel; varustuse tegeliku soetamise kõrval tuleb arvestada ka teisi aspekte, nagu teadus- ja arendustegevus, hüvituskokkulepped, tehniline hooldus, remont, relvastuse täiendamine ja koolitus;
Believes, with regard to the new directive, that both mandatory and optional instruments could be considered in connection with procurement procedures; considers that the emphasis should be placed on creating greater transparency and fairness in the award of contracts; points out that, in addition to the actual acquisition of equipment, other aspects will need to be taken into account, such as research and development, offsetting agreements, maintenance, repair, retrofitting and training;
a) pakkuma liikmesriikidele teadus- ja arendustegevuse ning riigihangetega seotud nõupidamismehhanismi;
a) provide Member States with a consultation mechanism in connection to R&D and procurement,
b) määratlema eeltingimused artikli 296 alusel kehtestatavatele eranditele ja tagama erandite tegemise ning teabe avalikustamata jätmise põhjuste nõuetekohase läbipaistvuse;
b) define preconditions for exemptions under Art 296 and ensure the required transparency of reasons for exemption and non-publication of information,
c) andma teavet piiriülese konkurentsi ja kaitsevarustuse piiriülese liikumise poliitika kohta;
c) inform policies regarding cross-border competition and transfer of defence equipment,
d) andma teavet ausa konkurentsi ja riigiabi eeskirjade kohta, et vältida konkurentsimoonutusi;
d) inform rules for fair competition and state support in order to avoid distortions on competition,
e) esitama kriteeriumid töövõtjate sobivuse ja valiku hindamiseks ning teisteks olulisteks mehhanismideks;
e) provide criteria for contractor eligibility and selection, and other important mechanisms,
f) sätestama kriteeriumid, et luua alus Euroopa kaitsevarustusturule, millest lähtuvalt võiks keskpikas perspektiivis sõltuvalt turu arengust välja töötada direktiivi;
f) set out criteria for laying the ground for a European Defence Equipment Market, which in the medium term could be developed to a directive depending on the progress in developing the market,
g) kehtestama üldised suunised, kuidas kujundada korvamismeetmetega seotud tavasid;
g) lay down general orientations on how to handle offset practices;
– piiriülese relvakaubanduse piirangud ELi sees,
- restrictions on cross-border trade in armaments within the EU,
– riiklike tellimuste otsuste poliitiline mõjutamine,
- exertion of political influence on award decisions,
– riigi tugev mõju relvatööstusettevõtetele,
- the strong state influence on armaments companies,
– puudujäägid abirahade kontrollimisel,
- the lack of controls on aid,
– puudulik teaduskoostöö (ka ELi teaduspoliitikas),
- the lack of research cooperation (within EU research policy too),
– puuduvad turutingimused globaalsel tasandil,
- the lack of market rules at the global level;
ning palub komisjonil kõrvuti selle algatusega võtta vastavaid meetmeid nimetatud probleemidega tegelemiseks;
and calls on the Commission to take appropriate measures, in tandem with this initiative, to tackle these problems;
26. palub komisjonil ja Euroopa Kaitseagentuuril esitada pikaajalisi ettepanekuid, näidates, kuidas tihedamad sidemed ELi ja USA, aga ka selliste riikide nagu Ukraina ja teatud sektorites ka Venemaa riigihangete turgude vahel võivad kaasa tuua nii suurema valiku kui ka tõhusama spetsialiseerumise;
Calls on the Commission - together with the European Defence Agency - to put forward proposals for the long term indicating how closer links between EU procurement markets and those in the United States and also in countries such as Ukraine and, in specific sectors, Russia could lead to both greater choice and more efficient specialisation;
30. peab turu avamist eelduseks, et tugevdada ELi majanduslikult kandevõimelist relvatööstust, arendada autonoomset ja tootlikku tööstuslikku baasi kulusäästlikumateks hangeteks ning tagada vajalikud kaitsevõimsused; on samaaegselt arvamusel, et relvatööstuse paratamatult tekkiv kontsentreerumine peab olema komisjoni intensiivse konkurentsiõigusliku järelevalve ja kontrolli all (konkurentsi peadirektoraat), et masstootmise eelised valdkondlike monopolide ja sellega seotud ettevõtete turuvõimu tõttu ohtu ei satuks;
Regards the opening up of the market as a precondition for strengthening a financially viable EU armaments industry, for developing an autonomous and powerful industrial basis for more cost-effective procurement and for ensuring the necessary defence capabilities; also considers that the inevitable concentration of the armaments industry should be subject to greater monitoring and control by the Commission (DG Competition) as regards competition law, so that the advantages of mass production are not jeopardised by sectoral monopolies and the resulting market power of companies;
I. Gegenstand des Grünbuches
I. Subject of the Green Paper
Jedoch unterliegt die Beschaffung von Gütern, die dem wesentlichen Sicherheitsinteresse eines Staates dienen, laut dem Ausnahmetatbestand von Artikel 296 EG-Vertrag
However, pursuant to the derogation provided for in Article 296 of the EC Treaty
Der Ausnahmetatbestand für eindeutig militärische Güter bleibt bestehen.
The exemption for goods which are clearly of a military nature will continue to apply.
Auf der anderen Seite wird das Bedenken geltend gemacht, dass mit einer Öffnung der Auftragsvergabe, der zweite Schritt vor dem ersten gemacht wird.
On the other hand, the reservation has been expressed that opening up the award of contracts would mean putting the cart before the horse.
Die von der Kommission erwogenen Maßnahmen, insbesondere eine Interpretation des Artikels 296 EG-Vertrag und eine Richtlinie über öffentliche Aufträge in sicherheitsrelevanten Bereichen gehen in die richtige Richtung.
The measures considered by the Commission, in particular an interpretation of Article 296 of the EC Treaty and a directive on public contracts in areas with relevance to security are a step in the right direction.
väliskomisjonI ARVAMUS (*)
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS (*)
Saaja: siseturu- ja tarbijakaitsekomisjon
for the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Roheline raamat kaitsealaste riigihangete kohta
on the Green Paper on Defence Procurement
Väliskomisjon palub vastutaval siseturu- ja tarbijakaitsekomisjonil lisada oma resolutsiooni ettepanekusse järgmised ettepanekud:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. nõustub komisjoniga, et Euroopa kaitseturgu on vaja sõjanduskulude vähendamiseks, arvestades turu suurust ning arenenud tehnoloogia ja suurte investeeringute vajadust;
Agrees with the Commission that a European defence market is necessary in order to minimise military expenditure costs given the size of the market, and the need for advanced technology and heavy investment;
7. nõustub seni komisjoniga, et tuleks teha jõupingutusi, et veenda riiklikke kaitsealaste hangete asutusi lõpetama artikli 296 kohaldamise suhtes tehtud üldise erandi rakendamine ja võtma meetmeid tagamaks, et kaitsealased riigihanked oleksid suuremal määral hõlmatud pigem ühenduse õigusaktidega kui üksnes riiklike õigusaktidega;
In the meantime, agrees with the Commission that every effort should be made to persuade national defence procurement agencies to discontinue the practice of general derogation from the application of Article 296 and to take measures to ensure that defence procurement is covered to a greater extent by Community legislation rather than purely by national legislation;
9. toetab täielikult komisjoni 23. septembri 2004. aasta rohelises raamatus esitatud ettepanekuid; komisjon peaks võtma vastu tõlgendava teatise, milles kinnitatakse kavatsust lõpetada artikli 296 kuritarvitamine ja koostada paralleelselt uus direktiiv, mis on kohandatud artikli 296 kohaselt toimuvate relvade, laskemoona ja sõjavarustuse hangete eripärale;
Fully supports the Commission's proposals put forward in its Green Paper of 23 September 2004; the Commission should both issue an interpretative communication stating its determination to put a stop to the abuse of Article 296 and draw up, in parallel, a new directive adapted to the specificities of defence for the procurement of arms, munitions and war material subject to Article 296;
11. rõhutab, et need tegevussuunad on täiendavad, kuna nad on üldjuhul suunatud kaitsealaste riigihangete turu erinevatele osadele ning konkreetsemalt võivad Euroopa Kaitseagentuuri tegevusjuhendiga seotud ettevalmistused anda direktiivi edasiarendamiseks sobivaid tulemusi; väljendab muret liikmesriikide poliitilise tahte puudumise üle tunnistada vajadust konkreetse direktiivi järele ja palub neil mitte lasta edusammudel tegevusjuhendi osas takistada tööd direktiivi kallal;
Stresses that such courses of action are complementary, since they will tend to address different segments of the defence procurement market, and that, more specifically, the preparatory work being undertaken by the EDA on the code of conduct may yield very relevant results for future work on the proposed directive; expresses its concern, however, about the lack of political will by Member States to embrace the need for a specific directive and calls on them not to let progress on the code of conduct preclude movement on a directive;
15. palub komisjonil ja Euroopa Kaitseagentuuril esitada pikaajalisi ettepanekuid, näidates, kuidas tihedamad sidemed ELi ja USA, aga ka selliste riikide nagu Ukraina ja teatud sektorites ka Venemaa riigihangete turgude vahel võivad kaasa tuua nii suurema valiku kui ka tõhusama spetsialiseerumise;
Calls on the Commission - together with the European Defence Agency - to put forward proposals for the long term indicating how closer links between EU procurement markets and those in the US and also in countries such as Ukraine and, in specific sectors, Russia could lead to both greater choice and more efficient specialisation;
Palub komisjonil jätkata Euroopa Parlamendiga antud teemal koostööd ning säilitada võimalikult kõrge eelneva konsulteerimise ja läbipaistvuse tase;
Requests the Commission to cooperate further with the European Parliament on this issue and to maintain the highest possible levels of prior consultation and transparency;
Roheline raamat kaitsealaste riigihangete kohta
Green Paper on Defence Procurement
tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjonI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY
Tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjon palub vastutaval siseturu- ja tarbijakaitsekomisjonil lisada oma resolutsiooni ettepanekusse järgmised ettepanekud:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. rõhutab, et turu killustatus iseenesest takistab ausa konkurentsini ja hästi toimiva ühtse turuni jõudmist; rõhutab, et ausa konkurentsi mõlemapoolsus on selle tagamise eeltingimus kõikides liikmesriikides kõikidele ELi tootjatele; märgib, et kulutusi kaitsevarustusele on oluliselt vähendatud, samal ajal kui turg on riiklike äriühingute, riigitoetuste ja konkurentsi puudumise tõttu endiselt killustatud ja moonutatud, mis viib teadusele ja arendustegevusele tehtavad kulutused tasakaalust välja, võrreldes toodetavate kogustega;
Underlines that the fragmentation of the market in itself is a crucial hindrance to fair competition and a well-functioning single market and underlines that reciprocity regarding fair competition in all Member States for all producers in the EU is a precondition for this to be achieved; notes that the amount of spending on defence equipment is strongly reduced, while the fragmentation and distortion of the market in form of state-owned companies, state subsidies and lack of competition are still the case, creating unbalanced proportions between spending on R&D in relation to the quantities produced;
4. on skeptiline tõlgendusteatisega saavutatava suhtes, kuna see vaid selgitab kehtivat õiguslikku raamistikku ega näe ette põhjalikumaid muudatusi, mille tegemine on vajalik; tervitab uue direktiivi kehtestamise ideed, kuid osutab, et ausa konkurentsi tagamiseks vajavad lahendamist probleemid, mis on seotud riigiomandisse kuuluva tööstusega ja riigi osalemisega, samuti muude turumoonutustega; arvab, et sellise direktiivi puhul tuleks artiklit 296 rakendada vaid nii palju, kui tingimata on vajalik;
Is sceptical as to what can be achieved by an interpretative communication as this only provides clarification of present legal framework, thereby not addressing the more fundamental changes that must be made; welcomes the idea of a new directive but points out the problems that must be solved regarding state-owned industry and state involvement, as well as other market distortions, in order to guarantee fair competition; considers that any such directive should reduce the use of Article 296 to the absolute minimum necessary;
7. arvab, et Euroopa Kaitseagentuur koos komisjoniga peaks kaalutlema, kuivõrd oleks võimalik ühendada Euroopa kaitsealaste riigihangete turgu Ameerika, teiste NATO riikide ja ka muude ELi väärtusi jagavate riikide turgudega ning valitud sektorites ka Vene turuga, et saavutada suurem konkurents ning suurem tehnoloogiline tõhusus;
Considers that the European Defence Agency, together with the Commission, should also consider to what extent the European defence procurement market might be networked with the US, other NATO markets and countries that share EU principles, and in selected sectors also with the Russian market, with a view to achieving more competition as well as greater technological efficiency;
Roheline raamat kaitsealaste riigihangete kohta
Green Paper on defence procurement
Vastutav komisjon loa andmisest istungil teada andmise kuupäev
Committee responsible Date authorisation announced in plenary
Vladimír Železnýlt puutumatuse äravõtmise taotlus
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Vladimír Železný
Vladimír Železnýlt puutumatuse äravõtmise taotluse kohta
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Vladimír Železný
– võttes arvesse Vladimír Železnýlt puutumatuse äravõtmise taotlust, mille Praha linnakohus edastas 30. augustil 2004. aastal ning millest anti teada 13. septembri 2004. aasta täiskogu istungil;
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Vladimír Železný, forwarded by the Prague Metropolitan Court on 30 August 2004, and announced in plenary sitting on 13 September 2004,
– olles vastavalt kodukorra artikli 7 lõikele 3 ära kuulanud Vladimír Železný, kes palus temalt parlamendiliikme puutumatust mitte ära võtta;
– having heard Vladimír Železný in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure, who requested that his parliamentary immunity not be waived,
– võttes arvesse 8. aprilli 1965. aasta Euroopa ühenduste privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli artiklit 10 ning otsestel ja üldistel valimistel esindajate Euroopa Parlamenti valimist käsitleva 20. septembri 1976. aasta akti artikli 6 lõiget 2;
– having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
Otsus kohtuasjas 101/63: Wagner v. Fohrmann ja Krier, EKL 1964, lk 195 ja otsus kohtuasjas 149/85: Wybot v. Faure ja teised, EKL 1986, lk 2391. ;
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– võttes arvesse Tšehhi Vabariigi põhiseaduse artiklit 27;
– having regard to Article 27 of the Constitution of the Czech Republic,
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artikli 6 lõiget 2 ja artiklit 7;
– having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse õiguskomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0289/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0289/2005 ),
At the sitting of 13 September 2004, the President of Parliament informed the House that he had received a letter from the Prague Metropolitan Court for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity on Vladimir Zelezný.
At the sitting of 13 September 2004, the President of Parliament informed the House that he had received a letter from the Prague Metropolitan Court for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity on Vladimir Zelezný.
The application ( suplicatoire ) was submitted by Dr Dusan Paske, Presiding Judge in the Prague Metropolitan Court to the President of Parliament.
The application ( suplicatoire ) was submitted by Dr Dusan Paske, Presiding Judge in the Prague Metropolitan Court to the President of Parliament.
The Court is requesting the waiver on parliamentary immunity of Dr Zelezný on the grounds that he is liable to criminal proceedings under Section 148 (1) and (4) of the Penal Code of the Czech Republic for persistent evasion of taxes, duties and other compulsory payments, on the basis of an indictment submitted by the Prague Public prosecutor on 8 March 2004.
The Court is requesting the waiver on parliamentary immunity of Dr Zelezný on the grounds that he is liable to criminal proceedings under Section 148 (1) and (4) of the Penal Code of the Czech Republic for persistent evasion of taxes, duties and other compulsory payments, on the basis of an indictment submitted by the Prague Public prosecutor on 8 March 2004.
The Court stresses that Dr Zelezný has remained at liberty during the above-mentioned criminal proceedings as there are no grounds for his imprisonment and nothing prevents him from continuing to perform his duties as a parliamentarian.
The Court stresses that Dr Zelezný has remained at liberty during the above-mentioned criminal proceedings as there are no grounds for his imprisonment and nothing prevents him from continuing to perform his duties as a parliamentarian.
In the application , the acting judge points out that Dr Zelezný was a senator of the Parliament of the Czech Republic before his election to the EP and that the Senate waived his immunity at its sitting of 23 January 2003.
In the application , the acting judge points out that Dr Zelezný was a senator of the Parliament of the Czech Republic before his election to the EP and that the Senate waived his immunity at its sitting of 23 January 2003.
Dr. Zelezný has acknowledged that, when he was Senator, a request to waive his parliamentary immunity had been presented by the police and that he asked the Senate to waive his immunity in the hope that it would accelerate the investigation procedure.
Dr. Zelezný has acknowledged that, when he was Senator, a request to waive his parliamentary immunity had been presented by the police and that he asked the Senate to waive his immunity in the hope that it would accelerate the investigation procedure.
The Senate waived the parliamentary immunity of Dr Zelezný apparently for the same or similar acts as those considered in connection with the present request.
The Senate waived the parliamentary immunity of Dr Zelezný apparently for the same or similar acts as those considered in connection with the present request.
When he appeared before the Committee, Dr Zelezný claimed that he has been a victim of political harassment and public intimidation for the last six years.
When he appeared before the Committee, Dr Zelezný claimed that he has been a victim of political harassment and public intimidation for the last six years.