natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· Regional competitiveness and employment: Outside the least developed Member States and regions, the Commission is proposing a two-fold approach: first, regional development programmes will help regions to anticipate and promote economic change by strengthening their competitiveness and attractiveness; and second, interventions will aim to foster job creation and gear skills more closely to economic change.
· Regional competitiveness and employment: Outside the least developed Member States and regions, the Commission is proposing a two-fold approach: first, regional development programmes will help regions to anticipate and promote economic change by strengthening their competitiveness and attractiveness; and second, interventions will aim to foster job creation and gear skills more closely to economic change.
It is suggested that around 17% (or EUR 57.9 billion) be used for this objective.
It is suggested that around 17% (or EUR 57.9 billion) be used for this objective.
As regards the operational programmes financed by the ESF, the Commission proposes to underpin the implementation of the employment recommendations and to strengthen social inclusion, in line with the objectives and guidelines of the EES.
As regards the operational programmes financed by the ESF, the Commission proposes to underpin the implementation of the employment recommendations and to strengthen social inclusion, in line with the objectives and guidelines of the EES.
Financed through the ERDF and the ESF.
Financed through the ERDF and the ESF.
· European territorial co-operation : Supporting cooperation between regions at cross-border, transnational and interregional level with a view to furthering the harmonious and balanced integration of the Union's territory is at the core of the third objective.
· European territorial co-operation : Supporting cooperation between regions at cross-border, transnational and interregional level with a view to furthering the harmonious and balanced integration of the Union's territory is at the core of the third objective.
Around 4% of the funding (or EUR 13.2 billion) will be spent on this priority.
Around 4% of the funding (or EUR 13.2 billion) will be spent on this priority.
According to the Commission's proposal the resources available for commitment from the Funds for the period 2007 to 2013 will stand at EUR 336.194 billion at 2004 prices, with the following annual breakdown:
According to the Commission's proposal the resources available for commitment from the Funds for the period 2007 to 2013 will stand at EUR 336.194 billion at 2004 prices, with the following annual breakdown:
(EUR millions – 2004 prices)
(EUR millions – 2004 prices)
Allocation (EUR billions)
Allocation (EUR billions)
The proposal is for the future enlarged European Union of 27 Member States.
The proposal is for the future enlarged European Union of 27 Member States.
The budget is equivalent to 0.41% of the gross national income of the 27-Member State European Union.
The budget is equivalent to 0.41% of the gross national income of the 27-Member State European Union.
Arvamuse koostaja soovitused
Draftswoman's recommendations
Eelarvekomisjon palub vastutaval regionaalarengukomisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised soovitused.
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following recommendations in its report:
6 arvab, et tulemuslikkuse ja kvaliteedi reservi puudutavad sätted tuleks Euroopa Parlamendiga konsulteerides läbi vaadata (artikkel 20);
Considers that the rules for the performance and quality reserve (Article 20) should be reviewed in consultation with the European Parliament ;
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek, millega nähakse ette üldsätted Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi, Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi ja Ühtekuuluvusfondi kohta
Proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
Natalie Griesbeck
Natalie Griesbeck
European Court of Auditors' Annual Report concerning the financial year 2003, paragraphs 5.67-5.69. , the draftsman remains concerned.
European Court of Auditors' Annual Report concerning the financial year 2003, paragraphs 5.67-5.69. , the draftsman remains concerned.
European Court of Auditors' Opinion No 2/2004. .
European Court of Auditors' Opinion No 2/2004. .
Eelarvekontrollikomisjon palub vastutaval regionaalarengukomisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Avalikustava avalduse allkirjastavad liikmesriigi tipp-poliitikud ja võimuesindajad (rahandusminister).
The disclosure statement shall be signed by the Member State's highest level political and managing authority (finance minister).
Artikli 45 lõike 1 teine lõik
Article 45, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
Hindamiste eesmärk on tõsta fondide toetuse kvaliteeti, mõjusust ja kooskõla ning rakenduskavade rakendamist.
Evaluations shall aim to improve the quality, effectiveness and consistency of Fund assistance and the implementation of operational programmes.
Samuti hinnatakse nende mõju ühenduse strateegilistele eesmärkide ja asutamislepingu artikli 158 ning asjaomaste liikmesriikide ja piirkondade konkreetsete struktuuriliste probleemide suhtes, võttes arvesse säästva arengu vajadusi ning ühenduse keskkonnamõju ja strateegilist keskkonna hindamist käsitlevat asjaomast seadlusandlust.
They shall also appraise their impact with respect to the strategic objectives of the Community, to Article 158 of the Treaty and to the specific structural problems affecting the Member States and regions concerned, while taking account of the needs of sustainable development and of the relevant Community legislation concerning environmental impact and strategic environmental assessment.
Hinnatakse vastavalt kohalikke, riiklikke ja ühenduse kulusid ning tulusid.
They shall evaluate local, national and Community costs and benefits respectively.
Samuti hinnatakse nende programmide mõju ühenduse strateegiliste eesmärkide ja asutamislepingu artikli 158 ning asjaomaste liikmesriikide ja piirkondade konkreetsete struktuuriliste probleemide suhtes, võttes arvesse säästva arengu vajadusi ning ühenduse keskkonnamõju ja strateegilist keskkonna hindamist käsitlevat asjaomast seadlusandlust.
They shall also appraise the impact of those programmes with respect to the strategic objectives of the Community, to Article 158 of the Treaty and to the specific structural problems affecting the Member States and regions concerned, while taking account of the needs of sustainable development and of the relevant Community legislation concerning environmental impact and strategic environmental assessment.
Artikli 46 lõike 3 kolmas lõik
Article 46, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3
Eelhindamise eesmärgiks on optimeerida rakenduskavadega seotud eelarveliste vahendite eraldamist ja parandada programmitöö kvaliteeti.
Ex-ante evaluation shall aim to optimise the allocation of budgetary resources under operational programmes and improve programming quality.
See peab kindlaks tegema keskmised ja pikemaaegsed vajadused, seatud eesmärgid, eeldatavad tulemused, mõõdetavad eesmärgid, vajaduse korral piirkonna jaoks kavandatud strateegia sidususe, ühenduse lisandväärtuse, mil määral on arvestatud ühenduse prioriteetidega, eelnevatest kavadest saadud kogemused ning rakendamist, järelvalvet, hindamist ja finantsjuhtimist käsitleva korra kvaliteedi ning hindama eelnimetatut.
It shall identify and appraise medium- and long-term needs, the goals to be achieved, the results expected, the quantified targets, the coherence , if necessary, of the strategy proposed for the region, the Community value-added, the extent to which the Community's priorities have been taken into account, the lessons drawn from previous programming and the quality of the procedures for implementation, monitoring, evaluation and financial management.
See peab kindlaks tegema keskmised ja pikemaaegsed vajadused, seatud eesmärgid, eeldatavad tulemused, mõõdetavad eesmärgid, piirkonna jaoks kavandatud strateegia sidususe, kohalike ja ühenduse kulude ning tulude analüüsi, ühenduse lisandväärtuse, mil määral on arvestatud ühenduse prioriteetidega, eelnevatest kavadest saadud kogemused ning rakendamist, järelvalvet, hindamist ja finantsjuhtimist käsitleva korra kvaliteedi ning hindama eelnimetatut.
It shall identify and appraise medium- and long-term needs, the goals to be achieved, the results expected, the quantified targets, the coherence of the strategy proposed for the region, an analysis of local and Community costs and benefits, the Community value-added, the extent to which the Community's priorities have been taken into account, the lessons drawn from previous programming and the quality of the procedures for implementation, monitoring, evaluation and financial management.
Artikli 75 lõige 3
Article 75, paragraph 3
Liikmesriigid saadavad hiljemalt iga aasta 31. jaanuariks komisjonile käesoleva eelarveaasta ja järgneva eelarveaasta maksetaotluste ajakohastatud prognoosid.
At the latest by 31 January every year, the Member States shall send the Commission an update of the payment request forecasts for the current financial year and the subsequent financial year.
Prognoosid peavad andma realistliku hinnangu liikmesriikide suutlikkusele teha kulutusi vastavatel ajavahemikel.
The forecasts should reflect a realistic assessment of Member States' spending abilities during the periods concerned.
Artikli 92 lõige 3 a (uus)
Article 92, paragraph 3 a (new)
Komisjon esitab alates 2007. aastast iga kolme aasta tagant Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule analüüsi, mis käsitleb kohustustest automaatse vabastamise eeskirjade tõhusust.
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council every three years, starting in 2007, an analysis concerning the effectiveness of the rules on automatic decommitment.
Inés Ayala Sender, Herbert Bösch, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Petr Duchoň, Szabolcs Fazakas, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ona Juknevičiene, Nils Lundgren, Hans-Peter Martin, Edith Mastenbroek, Véronique Mathieu, Jan Mulder, István Pálfi, Margarita Starkevičiutė, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Inés Ayala Sender, Herbert Bösch, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Petr Duchoň, Szabolcs Fazakas, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ona Juknevičienė, Nils Lundgren, Hans-Peter Martin, Edith Mastenbroek, Véronique Mathieu, Jan Mulder, István Pálfi, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs asks the Committee on Regional Development, in order to facilitate a positive outcome of the procedure, to present an interim report on the Commission proposal to Parliament containing recommendations for modification of the proposal, included in this opinion.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs asks the Committee on Regional Development, in order to facilitate a positive outcome of the procedure, to present an interim report on the Commission proposal to Parliament containing recommendations for modification of the proposal, included in this opinion.
New challenges for the Union
New challenges for the Union
On 10 February 2004 the European Commission presented its Communication on the new financial framework for the period after 2007.
On 10 February 2004 the European Commission presented its Communication on the new financial framework for the period after 2007.
On 18 February 2004, the Third Cohesion Report was approved.
On 18 February 2004, the Third Cohesion Report was approved.
Draft regulations to govern the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for the period 2007-2013 were published by the European Commission on 14 July 2004.
Draft regulations to govern the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for the period 2007-2013 were published by the European Commission on 14 July 2004.
In the context of an enlarged European Union which has set itself the objective of becoming the most dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion, these draft regulations have the potential to influence the effectiveness of programmes and strategies which Member States follow in pursuit of this objective
In the context of an enlarged European Union which has set itself the objective of becoming the most dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion, these draft regulations have the potential to influence the effectiveness of programmes and strategies which Member States follow in pursuit of this objective
The enlarged Union will have to address three major challenges:
The enlarged Union will have to address three major challenges:
1) a significant widening of disparities across the enlarged Union; disparities between the richest and poorest regions of the Union have doubled, while the EU average per capita income decreased by 12.5%;
1) a significant widening of disparities across the enlarged Union; disparities between the richest and poorest regions of the Union have doubled, while the EU average per capita income decreased by 12.5%;
2) an acceleration of economic and social restructuring, both as a result of globalisation and of the development of the knowledge-based economy and society;
2) an acceleration of economic and social restructuring, both as a result of globalisation and of the development of the knowledge-based economy and society;
3) the rapid ageing of the Union's population; the contraction in the labour force will have important implications in terms of employment and growth potential.
3) the rapid ageing of the Union's population; the contraction in the labour force will have important implications in terms of employment and growth potential.
The Union needs to tackle the above mentioned challenges.
The Union needs to tackle the above mentioned challenges.
To this end, the Lisbon agenda for sustainable development, full employment, greater productivity, strengthened social cohesion and environmental protection, provides the policy framework.
To this end, the Lisbon agenda for sustainable development, full employment, greater productivity, strengthened social cohesion and environmental protection, provides the policy framework.
Remarks on the Framework Regulation on the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund
Remarks on the Framework Regulation on the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (hereinafter: the Committee) has discussed the draft framework regulation on the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, with a particular focus on the European Social Fund and other matters related to its competences.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (hereinafter: the Committee) has discussed the draft framework regulation on the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, with a particular focus on the European Social Fund and other matters related to its competences.
The Committee welcomes the strengthened strategic approach to cohesion policy in the draft Regulation and acknowledges the stated desire of the European Commission to simplify the procedures concerning the Funds.
The Committee welcomes the strengthened strategic approach to cohesion policy in the draft Regulation and acknowledges the stated desire of the European Commission to simplify the procedures concerning the Funds.
However, our Committee is concerned that these new procedures may increase bureaucracy and that there may be a risk of duplication as far as the draft ESF implementing regulation is concerned.
However, our Committee is concerned that these new procedures may increase bureaucracy and that there may be a risk of duplication as far as the draft ESF implementing regulation is concerned.
The Committee considers that more simplification should be achieved.
The Committee considers that more simplification should be achieved.
The draft framework regulation should not be too prescriptive or unnecessarily detailed; thus there should be an appropriate balance between the framework regulation and the implementing regulations.
The draft framework regulation should not be too prescriptive or unnecessarily detailed; thus there should be an appropriate balance between the framework regulation and the implementing regulations.
In particular, the framework regulation should take full account of the nature and size of ESF activities.
In particular, the framework regulation should take full account of the nature and size of ESF activities.
The Committee stresses that different rules may be appropriate for ESF operations compared with ERDF operations.
The Committee stresses that different rules may be appropriate for ESF operations compared with ERDF operations.
The Committee considers that the ESF should ensure support to Member States policies aiming to achieve full employment, improve productivity and quality of work and promote social inclusion and the reduction of regional employment disparities and thereby the European Social Model.
The Committee considers that the ESF should ensure support to Member States policies aiming to achieve full employment, improve productivity and quality of work and promote social inclusion and the reduction of regional employment disparities and thereby the European Social Model.
The Committee recalls the role that the ESF plays in promoting social inclusion by helping to integrate disadvantaged people into the labour market.
The Committee recalls the role that the ESF plays in promoting social inclusion by helping to integrate disadvantaged people into the labour market.
Our Committee believes that social inclusion activities funded by the ESF improve employment opportunities.
Our Committee believes that social inclusion activities funded by the ESF improve employment opportunities.
Finally, concerning the coordinating committee referred to in Article 104 of the draft framework regulation, the Committee requests the European Commission to ensure appropriate coordination with the ESF Committee.
Finally, concerning the coordinating committee referred to in Article 104 of the draft framework regulation, the Committee requests the European Commission to ensure appropriate coordination with the ESF Committee.
Tööhõive- ja sotsiaalkomisjon palub vastutaval regionaalarengukomisjonil lisada oma resolutsiooni ettepanekusse järgmised ettepanekud:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following proposals in its motion for a resolution:
Pakett koosneb määrusest Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi kohta, määrusest Ühtekuuluvusfondi kohta ning määrusest Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi kohta.
The package consists of a Regulation on the European Social Fund, a Regulation on the Cohesion Fund and a Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund.
Paketis on määratletud eesmärgid, mille saavutamisele struktuurifondid kaasa aitavad, samuti liikmesriikidele ja piirkondadele kehtivad abikõlblikkuse kriteeriumid, olemasolevad rahalised vahendid ning kriteeriumid nende eraldamiseks;
It defines the objectives to which the Structural Funds are to contribute, the criteria for Member States and regions to be eligible under those Funds, the financial resources available and the criteria for their allocation;
4. nõuab, et nii maa- kui linnaruumis jätkatakse eelkõige tööhõive jaoks oluliste edusammudega kultuurilise arengu edendamisel, keskkonna- ja kultuurimaastiku kvaliteedi ning elutingimuste kvalitatiivse ja kultuurilise dimensiooni parandamisel, samuti turismi arendamisel, ning et nimetatud faktorite tähtsusele piirkondade atraktiivsuse parandamisel pöörataks jätkuvalt tähelepanu (artikli 3 lõige 3);
Calls for efforts, both in rural and urban areas, to build on the success achieved, particularly as regards employment, by promoting cultural development, improving the quality of the physical and cultural environment and the qualitative and cultural aspects of the conditions in which people live, and developing tourism, and calls for the importance of these factors in enhancing the attractive power of regions to continue to be taken into account (Article 3(3));
9. peab ülevaatamist korra aastas liiga bürokraatlikuks ja Euroopa Ülemkogu 22. märtsi 2005. aasta Brüsseli istungjärgu otsuste valgusel aegunuks, ning nõuab seetõttu raporti esitamist iga kolme aasta tagant;
Regards the requirement for annual examination as excessively bureaucratic and, in view of the decisions taken at the European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005 in Brussels, outdated, and therefore calls for reports to be submitted every three years;
12. nõuab, et kõik katsed esitatud finantsraamistiku kohandamiseks, kaasa arvatud koguvahendid ja nende jaotamine eri eesmärkidele ja osadele, lükatakse otsustavalt tagasi, ja on sellega seoses arvamusel, et Euroopa Komisjoni esitatud suurusjärjestus vahendite eraldamiseks eri eesmärkidele kujutab endast ausat tasakaalu konkureerivate huvide vahel;
Calls for the decisive rejection of any attempts to adjust the proposed financial framework with regard to either the total amount of resources or how they are distributed between the various objectives and components and considers, regardless of any such attempts, that the Commission's proposals concerning the approximate scale of funds to be allocated to the various objectives strike a fair balance between competing interests;
Seega palub tööhõive- ja sotsiaalkomisjon vastutaval regionaalarengukomisjonil kohaldada Euroopa Parlamendi kodukorra artikli 75 lõiget 3 ning menetluse positiivse tulemuse saavutamise lihtsustamiseks lisab soovitused muudatusteks (põhjendused 2, 3, 12, 13, 15, 26, 27 ja 41 ning artiklid 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14, 17, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 33, 36, 43, 44, 45 ja 51).
Therefore, our committee asks the committee responsible to decide to apply article 75(3) of the European Parliament Rules of Procedure and in order to facilitate a positive outcome of the procedure includes its recommendations for modification in the Annex (Recitals 2, 3, 12, 13, 15, 26, 27, 41 and Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14, 17, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 33, 36, 43, 44, 45 and 51).
SOOVITUSED MUUDATUSTEKS
recommendations for modification
Parlamendi soovitused
Recommendations by Parliament
2) Euroopa Ülemkogu Lissaboni ja Göteborgi istungjärkudel määratletud ühenduse säästva arengu prioriteetide kaasamise teel peaks ühtekuuluvuspoliitika aitama kaasa majanduskasvu, konkurentsivõime ja tööhõive suurendamisele
(2) Cohesion policy should contribute to increasing growth, competitiveness and employment by incorporating the Community’s priorities for sustainable development as defined at the European Councils in Lisbon and Göteborg.
2) Euroopa Ülemkogu Lissaboni, Nice'i ja Göteborgi istungjärkudel määratletud ühenduse säästva arengu ja tõrjutusvastase võitluse prioriteetide kaasamise teel peaks ühtekuuluvuspoliitika aitama kaasa majanduskasvu, konkurentsivõime, sotsiaalse ühtekuuluvuse , tööhõive ja sotsiaalse hõlvamise suurendamisele.
(2) Cohesion policy should contribute to increasing growth, competitiveness , social cohesion, employment and social inclusion by incorporating the Community’s priorities for sustainable development and combating exclusion as defined at the European Councils in Lisbon , Nice and Göteborg.
Cohesion policy should also be geared towards social inclusion, which is recognised as one of the Union’s overarching objectives.
Cohesion policy should also be geared towards social inclusion, which is recognised as one of the Union’s overarching objectives.
3) Majanduslikud, sotsiaalsed ja piirkondlikud erinevused on laienenud ELis kasvanud nii piirkondlikul kui ka riiklikul tasandil.
(3) Economic, social and territorial disparities at both regional and national level have increased in the enlarged Community.
Seepärast tuleks tõsta kogu ELi konkurentsivõimet ja tööhõivet.
Competitiveness and employment should therefore be increased throughout the Community.