natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pärast liidu laienemist 1. mail 2004 antakse Ühtekuuluvusfondist abi kümnele uuele liikmesriigile kuni 2006. aasta lõpuni samamoodi nagu kolmele endiselt abisaavale liikmesriigile (Hispaania, Portugal, Kreeka) ajavahemiku 2000–2006 lõpuni.
Following the Union's enlargement on 1 May 2004, the Cohesion Fund applies to the 10 new Member States until the end of 2006, as well as to the three Member States eligible at the end of the 2000-2006 period (Greece, Portugal and Spain).
Ühtekuuluvusfond peaks aitama kaasa kõige vähem arenenud liikmesriikide ja piirkondade lähenemise eesmärgile rahalise osalusega selle eesmärgi raames teostatavates tegevusprogrammides.
The Cohesion Fund is intended to contribute to the convergence of less developed Member States and regions through financial participation in the operational programmes of this convergence objective.
Komisjon kinnitab, et selle poliitika väärtuseks olevaid põhiprintsiipe (mitmeaastane programmitöö, partnerlus, hindamine, ühine juhtimine) järgides põhineb see reform tasakaalu leidmisel strateegilise dimensiooni tugevdamise ja rakendussüsteemi lihtsustamise vahel.
The Commission claims that while maintaining the fundamental principles which underpin the value of the policy (multiannual programming, partnership, evaluation, shared management), this reform provides a balance between an increased strategic component and a simplification of the implementation system.
Uute liikmesriikide liitumine 1. mail 2004, kes kõik täidavad Ühtekuuluvusfondist abi saamise nõudeid, ja uute ja oluliste rahastamisvajaduste olemasolu nendes maades õigustavad fondi tegevusvaldkonna laiendamist.
An extension of the domains of intervention is justified by the accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004, all of which are eligible for funding under the Cohesion Fund, and which face new and important financing needs.
Tegevusvaldkonna laiendamine on kooskõlas asutamislepingu vastavate sätetega ja vastab Euroopa Ülemkogu Lissaboni (märts 2000) ja Göteborgi (juuni 2001) istungitel kindlaks määratud prioriteetidele.
This extension of the domain of intervention is in accordance with the corresponding provisions in the Treaty, and is in line with the priorities decided by the European Council in Lisbon (March 2000) and Gothenburg (June 2001).
Ühtekuuluvusfondist abi saavad liikmesriigid peavad täitma asutamislepingus lähenemisprogrammide suhtes sätestatud tingimusi ning majandus- ja rahaliidus osalevate liikmesriikide puhul ülemäärase eelarvepuudujäägiga seotud tingimusi.
Member States benefiting from the Cohesion Fund must conform to the conditions set out in the Treaty regarding convergence programmes and those regarding excessive deficits for the Member States participating in economic and monetary union.
Ühtekuuluvusfondist antakse abi ainult juhul, kui need tingimused on täidetud.
Implementation of the Cohesion Fund is conditional upon the satisfaction of these conditions.
Kui nõukogu täheldab komisjoni ettepaneku põhjal ülemäärast riigieelarve puudujääki ja asjaomane liikmesriik ei ole võtnud tõhusaid meetmeid, peatatakse Ühtekuuluvusfondist tulenevad maksekohustused alates järgmise aasta 1. jaanuarist.
If the Council decides, on the basis of a Commission proposal, that an excessive deficit exists and that the Member State concerned has not taken effective action, the payment will be suspended as from January 1 of the following year.
Rahastamise peatamine lõpeb, kui nõukogu samades tingimustes otsustades täheldab, et asjaomane liikmesriik on võtnud parandusmeetmed, mis võimaldavad asutamislepingule ja nõukogu otsustele vastava olukorra taastamist.
The suspension ceases when the Council decides, on the same basis, that the Member State concerned has taken the measures necessary to allow a return to a situation that is in accordance with the Treaty and with the Council decisions.
RAHALINE MÕJU
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Abikõlblikud on ainult need liikmesriigid, kelle rahvamajanduse kogutulu elaniku kohta on alla 90% ühenduse keskmisest.
Only those Members States whose per capita gross national income (GNI) is less than 90% of the Community average are eligible.
Komisjoni ettepaneku põhjal ja finantsperspektiiviga seotud töö tulemusi oodates on kasutada olevad kulukohustuste assigneeringud ajavahemikuks 2007–2013 kõikide struktuurifondide jaoks 336,194 miljardit eurot 2004. aasta hindades.
On the basis of the Commission proposal and until such time as the work on the financial perspective is known, the commitment appropriations available for all the Structural Funds for the period 2007 to 2013 will stand at EUR 336.194 billion, at 2004 prices.
Ühtekuuluvusfondist rahastatakse "lähenemise" eesmärki, millele kulub 264 miljardit eurot (78,54% koguvahenditest).
The Cohesion Fund finances the 'convergence' objective, which shall amount to EUR 264 billion (78.54% of the resources).
Ettepanek on koostatud tulevase, 27 liikmesriigiga Euroopa Liidu jaoks.
The proposal covers the future 27-Member State European Union.
Eelarvekomisjoni kutsub vastutavat regionaalarengukomisjoni lisama oma resolutsiooni projekti järgmisi soovitusi:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to include the following recommendations in its report:
5. palub nõukogul ja komisjonil kanda finantsdokumentidesse (vastavalt finantsmääruse artiklile 3) komisjoni esitatud kulukohustuste assigneeringute iga-aastane jaotus;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to transfer to the financial documents (in accordance with Article 3 of the Financial Regulation) the annual breakdown of commitment appropriations proposed by the Commission,
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega asutatakse Ühtekuuluvusfond
Proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega asutatakse Ühtekuuluvusfond
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund
Transpordi- ja turismikomisjon palub vastutaval regionaalarengukomisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Lisada artikli 2 lõike 1 lõppu järgmine täiendus:
To add the following wording at the end of Article 2(1):
Lisada artikli 4 lõikesse 5 järgmine lause:
To add the following fifth paragraph to Article 4:
"Käesolev määrus ei sea takistusi nõukogu õigusele jätkata Ühtekuuluvusfondi toetuse rakendamist perioodi 2007–2013 jooksul aastast aastasse üha kahanevas ulatuses neile liikmesriikidele, kelle rikkus ületas 90% Euroopa keskmisest lihtsalt statistilise efekti tõttu, mille tekitas kümne uue riigi ühinemine Euroopa Liiduga 1. mail 2004."
‘This Regulation shall not prevent the Council from extending application of the Cohesion Fund on an annually decreasing basis over the period 2007-2013 to Member States whose wealth has exceeded 90% of the European average purely as a result of the statistical effect of the accession to the European Union of 10 new Member States on 1 May 2004.’
Artikli 2 lõike 3 sõnastus peaks olema järgmine:
Article 2, point 3 should read as follows:
"säästvat arengut soodustavates ja selget keskkondlikku mõõdet omavates valdkondades, nagu energiatõhusus ja taastuvad energiaallikad, ning transpordivaldkonna osas väljaspool üleeuroopalisi võrke teelõike, mis on samaväärsed üleeuroopalisi võrke ühendavate kiir- ja peateedega, raudtee- (kaasa arvatud veeremid), sisevee- ja meretransporti, mitmeliigilisi transpordisüsteeme ja nende omavahelist toimimist, maantee- ja õhuliikluse mahtude kontrollimist, puhast linnatransporti ja ühistransporti (kaasa arvatud veeremid ja bussitranspordile mõeldud teede infrastruktuur)."
‘areas that can be developed on a sustainable basis and clearly present environmental benefits, namely energy efficiency and renewable energy and, in the transport sector outside the trans-European networks, sections equivalent to motorways or trunk roads connecting the trans-European networks, rail (including rolling stock), river and sea transport, intermodal transport systems and their interoperability, management of road and air traffic, clean urban transport and public transport (including rolling stock and road infrastructure for coach and bus transport).’.
The Commission has proposed a new Council regulation on the Cohesion Fund.
The Commission has proposed a new Council regulation on the Cohesion Fund.
The procedure for adopting this proposal for a regulation is the assent procedure.
The procedure for adopting this proposal for a regulation is the assent procedure.
The main objective of this proposal for a regulation is to specify the tasks of the Cohesion Fund and the specific ways in which it is applied, particularly as regards assistance under the Fund and its scope.
The main objective of this proposal for a regulation is to specify the tasks of the Cohesion Fund and the specific ways in which it is applied, particularly as regards assistance under the Fund and its scope.
It should be noted that eligibility of Member States and regions to financial assistance under the Fund is regulated in accordance with the Proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund ( COM(2004)0492 ).
It should be noted that eligibility of Member States and regions to financial assistance under the Fund is regulated in accordance with the Proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund ( COM(2004)0492 ).
The present proposal for a regulation lays down the scope of assistance and the conditionality rules governing assistance under the Fund.
The present proposal for a regulation lays down the scope of assistance and the conditionality rules governing assistance under the Fund.
It is envisaged that the Fund will provide support for trans-European transport networks, particularly projects of European interest as identified by Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (OJ L 228 of 9.9.1996, p.
It is envisaged that the Fund will provide support for trans-European transport networks, particularly projects of European interest as identified by Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (OJ L 228 of 9.9.1996, p.
Your draftsman of course wishes to make certain that the projects concerned will include those annexed to Decision No 884/2004/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 (OJ L 167 of 30.4.2004, p.
Your draftsman of course wishes to make certain that the projects concerned will include those annexed to Decision No 884/2004/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 (OJ L 167 of 30.4.2004, p.
1) last amending the above-mentioned Decision, which currently includes an expanded list of projects to take account of the requirements of the new Member States and the priorities of the other Member States.
1) last amending the above-mentioned Decision, which currently includes an expanded list of projects to take account of the requirements of the new Member States and the priorities of the other Member States.
Your draftsman also notes that, beyond the trans-European networks, the Cohesion Fund will also promote rail, river and sea transport, intermodal transport systems and their interoperability, management of road and air traffic, clean transport and public transport.
Your draftsman also notes that, beyond the trans-European networks, the Cohesion Fund will also promote rail, river and sea transport, intermodal transport systems and their interoperability, management of road and air traffic, clean transport and public transport.
The other relevant article of the proposal for a regulation concerns the action to be taken within the Cohesion Fund framework if the Council determines that an excessive government deficit exists in a Member State.
The other relevant article of the proposal for a regulation concerns the action to be taken within the Cohesion Fund framework if the Council determines that an excessive government deficit exists in a Member State.
The proposal for a regulation differs from the previous regulation in two important aspects.
The proposal for a regulation differs from the previous regulation in two important aspects.
It does not lay down a system for managing and controlling the Fund, and it does not provide an indicative programme of annual expenses for a planning period (e.g. 2007-2013).
It does not lay down a system for managing and controlling the Fund, and it does not provide an indicative programme of annual expenses for a planning period (e.g. 2007-2013).
As regards the first aspect, the management and control rules are contained in the proposal for a regulation laying down general provisions.
As regards the first aspect, the management and control rules are contained in the proposal for a regulation laying down general provisions.
This is an understandable approach which aims to coordinate planning between the three funds (regional, social and cohesion) to better achieve the objectives of convergence, regional competitiveness and territorial cooperation.
This is an understandable approach which aims to coordinate planning between the three funds (regional, social and cohesion) to better achieve the objectives of convergence, regional competitiveness and territorial cooperation.
Nevertheless, neither this proposal for a regulation nor the proposal for a regulation laying down general provisions sets out the Fund’s expenditure allocation on a year-by-year basis or by programming period.
Nevertheless, neither this proposal for a regulation nor the proposal for a regulation laying down general provisions sets out the Fund’s expenditure allocation on a year-by-year basis or by programming period.
Consequently, it is impossible to evaluate the support the Cohesion Fund could provide to transport policy, including trans-European networks, in the countries concerned, even if the sum allocated to the ‘convergence’ objective is known.
Consequently, it is impossible to evaluate the support the Cohesion Fund could provide to transport policy, including trans-European networks, in the countries concerned, even if the sum allocated to the ‘convergence’ objective is known.
It should be noted that only countries whose GDP does not exceed 90% of the EU average are eligible under the Cohesion Fund.
It should be noted that only countries whose GDP does not exceed 90% of the EU average are eligible under the Cohesion Fund.
However, enlargement has created a statistical effect which causes certain countries of the former Union of Fifteen to be excluded.
However, enlargement has created a statistical effect which causes certain countries of the former Union of Fifteen to be excluded.
Your draftsman believes the Commission should apply a degree of flexibility in this area as regards approval of Cohesion Fund assistance.
Your draftsman believes the Commission should apply a degree of flexibility in this area as regards approval of Cohesion Fund assistance.
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Said El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Dirk Sterckx, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zile
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Dirk Sterckx, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega asutatakse Ühtekuuluvusfond
Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund
art 161 (EÜ)
Article 161 EC
TRAN art 75 lg 3
TRAN Rule 75(3)
Komisjoni heakskiitmise suunised
on guidelines for the approval of the European Commission
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artikleid 213 ja 214 ja Euroopa Aatomienergiaühenduse asutamislepingu artiklit 126
– having regard to Articles 213 and 214 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 126 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community
Nice’i lepingu laienemise protokolli artikliga 4 muudetud kujul, nagu seda on muudetud 16. aprilli 2003. aasta ühinemisakti artikliga 45 (jõustunud 1. mail 2004). ;
As amended by Article 4 of the Protocol on enlargement of the Treaty of Nice, as modified by Article 45 of the 2003 Accession Act. ,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa põhiseaduse lepingu artikleid 26, 27, 28, 348 ja 350 ja valitsustevahelise konverentsi lõppaktile lisatud Euroopa põhiseaduse artikli 27 deklaratsiooni 7;
– having regard to Articles 26, 27, 28, 348 and 350 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, and to Declaration 7 on Article 27 of the Constitution for Europe, annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference,
– võttes arvesse 20. septembri 1976. aasta akti artiklit 10 Euroopa Parlamendi saadikute otsese ja üldise valimise kohta
– having regard to Article 10 of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage
EÜT L 278, 8.10.1976. ;
OJ L 278, 8.10.1976. ,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja komisjoni vaheliste suhete raamlepingut;
– having regard to the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission,
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artikleid 45, 98 ja 99;
– having regard to Rule 45 and to Rules 98 and 99 of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse põhiseaduskomisjoni raportit ( A6-0179/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0179/2005 )
A. komisjoni kandidaatide kuulamised parlamendis, mida esmakordselt kasutati 1994. aastal ja mida pärast seda on edasi arendatud, on saavutanud õiguspärasuse, mida aktsepteerivad täielikult lisaks parlamendile ja komisjonile ka nõukogu ja liikmesriigid;
A. Parliamentary hearings of Commission candidates, first used in 1994 and developed since, have acquired a legitimacy which is fully accepted not only by Parliament and the Commission but also by the Council and the Member States;
B. komisjoni demokraatlikku kontrolli suurendab ka parlamendi tunnustamisprotsess, mis on avatud, õiglane ja pidev ning mille käigus iga volinikukandidaat avaldab parlamendile kogu asjakohase teabe;
B. The Commission's democratic accountability is greatly enhanced by a Parliamentary approval process which is open, fair and consistent, and in which each Commissioner-designate discloses to Parliament all relevant information;
1. võtab vastu järgmised põhimõtted, kriteeriumid ja korra, millega pannakse kogu komisjoni kolleegium nõusolekuhääletusele,
Adopts the following principles, criteria and arrangements for making the whole college of the Commission subject to its vote of consent:
Hindamise kriteeriumid
Criteria for assessment
a) vastavalt põhiseaduse artikli I-26 lõikele 4 hindab parlament volinikukandidaate nende üldise asjatundlikkuse, Euroopa asjadesse pühendumuse ja kaheldamatu sõltumatuse alusel.
(a) In accordance with Article I-26(4) of the Constitution, Parliament will evaluate Commissioners-designate on the ground of their general competence, European commitment and indubitable independence.
Parlament hindab vastava haldusala teadmisi ja suhtlemisoskust;
It will assess knowledge of the relevant portfolio and communication skills.
b) parlament peab eriti silmas naiste ja meeste võrdset esindatust.
(b) Parliament will have special regard for gender balance.
See võib väljenduda portfellide jaotamises presidendikandidaadi poolt;
It may express itself on the disposition of portfolio responsibilities by the President-elect.
c) parlament võib taotleda mis tahes teavet, mis aitab teha otsust kandidaatide sobivuse kohta.
(c) Parliament may seek any information relevant to its reaching a decision about the aptitude of the candidates.
Parlament soovib finantshuvidega seotud teabe täielikku avaldamist;
It will expect full disclosure of information pertaining to financial interests.
d) iga volinikukandidaat kutsutakse ühekordseks kolmetunniseks kuulamiseks parlamendi asjaomase komisjoni või komisjonide ette.
(d) Each Commissioner-designate will be invited to appear before the appropriate parliamentary committee or committees for a single hearing of three hours.
Kuulamised on avalikud;
The hearings will be in public.
e) kuulamisi organiseeritakse koos esimeeste konverentsi ja komisjonide esimeeste konverentsiga.
(e) The hearings will be organised jointly by the Conference of Presidents and the Conference of Committee Chairs.
Asjaomaste komisjonide kaasamiseks antakse kohased korraldused, kui haldusalad segunevad.
Appropriate arrangements will be made to associate relevant committees where portfolios are mixed.
On kolm võimalust:
There are three possibilities:
– volinikukandidaadi portfell langeb kokku üheainsa parlamendikomisjoni pädevusvaldkondadega; sel juhul kuulatakse volinikukandidaat ära ainult selles parlamendikomisjonis;
– if the portfolio of the Commissioner-designate falls within the remit of only one parliamentary committee, he/she will be heard by that committee alone;
– volinikukandidaadi portfell sisaldab võrdsetes osades mitme parlamendikomisjoni pädevusvaldkondi; sel juhul kuulatakse volinikukandidaat ära kõigis nendes parlamendikomisjonides;
– if the portfolio of the Commissioner-designate falls more or less equally within the remit of several parliamentary committees, he/she will be heard jointly by these committees;
– volinikukandidaadi portfell sisaldab väga suures osas ühe parlamendikomisjoni pädevusvaldkondi ja vaid väikses osas ühe või mitme teise parlamendikomisjoni pädevusvaldkondi; sel juhul kuulatakse volinikukandidaat ära selles parlamendikomisjonis, mis on põhiosas pädev, kusjuures viimane kutsub teised parlamendikomisjonid kuulamisest osa võtma.
– if the portfolio of the Commissioner-designate falls mainly within the remit of one parliamentary committee and only to a small extent within the remit of one or more other parliamentary committees, he/she will be heard by the committee mainly responsible, which will invite the other committee or committees to attend the hearing.
Korra osas peetakse üksikasjalikult nõu komisjoni presidendikandidaadiga;
The President-elect of the Commission will be fully consulted about the arrangements.
f) parlamendikomisjonid esitavad kirjalikult vastatavad küsimused volinikukandidaatidele aegsasti enne kuulamisi.
(f) The parliamentary committees will submit written questions to the Commissioners-designate in good time before the hearings.
Iga pädev parlamendikomisjon võib esitada kuni viis olulist kirjalikult vastatavat küsimust;
The number of substantive written questions shall be limited to five per parliamentary committee responsible.
g) kuulamised toimuvad sellistel asjaoludel ja tingimustel, mille korral volinikukandidaatidel on võrdne ja õiglane võimalus end ja oma arvamusi esitleda;
(g) Hearings will take place in circumstances and under conditions whereby Commissioners-designate enjoy an equal and fair opportunity to present themselves and their opinions.