natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Iga rakenduskava vaadatakse üle, kui tema rakendamisel on tekkinud raskusi või kui on tehtud olulisi strateegilisi muudatusi või kui soovitakse järgida usaldusväärse halduse põhimõtet ja vajaduse korral võib ühenduse või liikmesriigi algatusel kogu ülejäänud perioodi üle vaadata ka pärast seda, kui järelevalvekomitee on rakenduskava kooskõlas artikliga 61 heaks kiitnud.
Each operational programme shall be re-examined where a difficulty has arisen in implementation or if there have been significant strategic changes or for reasons of sound management and, if necessary , revised for the rest of the period on the initiative of the Member State or the Commission, after approval by the Monitoring Committee provided for in Article 61.
Ülevaatamisel pööratakse eelkõige tähelepanu komisjoni aastaaruannetes ja aastakontrollides tehtud järeldustele, eriti kui need on seotud ühise kalanduspoliitika ülevaatamise või tugevdamisega, samuti arvestatakse artiklis 48 sätestatud vahehindamise tulemuste ja järeldustega.
Revisions shall take account in particular of the Commission annual reports and any conclusions of the annual examination, particularly to revise or strengthen the priorities of the common fisheries policy and the finding and conclusions on the mid-term evaluation provided for in Article 48.
Iga rakenduskava vaadatakse üle ja vajaduse korral , kui tema rakendamisel on tekkinud raskusi või kui on tehtud olulisi strateegilisi muudatusi või kui soovitakse järgida usaldusväärse halduse põhimõtet, võib liikmesriigi või komisjoni algatusel kogu ülejäänud perioodi üle vaadata ka pärast seda, kui järelevalvekomitee on rakenduskava heaks kiitnud, nagu näeb ette artikkel 61.
Each operational programme shall be re-examined and, if necessary, where a difficulty has arisen in implementation or if there have been significant strategic changes or for reasons of sound management, revised for the rest of the period on the initiative of the Member State or the Commission, after approval by the Monitoring Committee as provided for in Article 61.
In order to enable proper evaluation, re-examination should take place in any case in order to find out if there have been difficulties in implementation.
In order to enable proper evaluation, re-examination should take place in any case in order to find out if there have been difficulties in implementation.
Artikli 46 lõige 6
Article 46, paragraph 6
Hindamise viivad läbi sõltumatud hindajad.
Evaluation shall be carried out by independent assessors.
Tulemused avaldatakse kooskõlas Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1049/2001 sätetega, kui hindamise eest vastutav asutus sellele kindlasõnaliselt vastu ei ole.
The results shall be published, unless the authority responsible for the evaluation expressly objects, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and the Council.
Tulemused avaldatakse kooskõlas Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1049/2001 sätetega.
The results shall be published, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
i a) tõhus tagasinõudmise kord.
(i a) effective recovery procedures.
j a) iga eeskirjade olulise eiramise tõttu ühenduse fondidest liigselt makstud summa tagasimaksmise tagamine, vajaduse korral koos intressiga; arvestuse pidamine tagasimakstavate summade kohta ning komisjonile nende summade, mis on määratud tagasinõutavaks järgmisest kuludeklaratsioonist mahaarvamise teel, tagasimaksmine.
(j a) ensuring the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate, keeping an account of amounts recoverable, and repaying to the Commission amounts recovered by deduction from the next statement of expenditure.
Artikli 65 lõike 2 punkt g
Article 65, paragraph 2, point (g)
g) teatis rakenduskava elluviimise vastavuse kohta ühenduse poliitikas esitatud nõuetele ja kui see on asjakohane, tekkinud probleemide ja nende lahendamiseks võetud meetmete kirjeldus;
(g) a declaration on compliance with Community policies during the implementation of the operational programme and, where appropriate, identifying any problems encountered and the taken to rectify them;
g) tekkinud probleemide ja nende lahendamiseks võetud meetmete kirjeldus ;
(g) identification of any problems encountered and the measures taken to rectify them;
Artikli 65 lõige 2 a (uus)
Article 65, paragraph 2 a (new)
Lisaks korraldusasutuse välja antavale aastaaruandele annab iga liikmesriik igal aastal tagantjärele välja kinnitava deklaratsiooni Euroopa Kalandusfondi rakendamisega seonduvate alustehingute seaduslikkuse ja korrektsuse kohta.
In addition to the annual report issued by the managing authority, each Member State shall issue an annual ex post Declaration of Assurance as regards the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions concerning the implementation of the European Fisheries Fund.
Antud deklaratsioonis võetakse arvesse vastavalt artikli 60 lõike 1 punktidele e ja ii avaldatud auditeerimisasutuse arvamust ning selle allkirjastab iga liikmesriigi kõrgeim poliitiline ja korraldusasutus (rahandusminister).
This declaration shall take into account the opinion of the audit authority issued pursuant to Article 60(1)(e)(ii) and shall be signed by each Member State's highest political and managing authority (Finance Minister).
Parliament has adopted the concept of a national ex post declaration of assurance in the 2003 Commission discharge exercise
Parliament has adopted the concept of a national ex post declaration of assurance in the 2003 Commission discharge exercise
European Parliament Resolution of 12 April 2005, P6_TA-PROV(2005)0092 , paragraph 21. .
European Parliament Resolution of 12 April 2005, P6_TA-PROV(2005)0092 , paragraph 21. .
Artikli 66 lõike 3 punkt d
Article 66, paragraph 3, point (d)
d) pärast neljanda aastaaruanne esitamist ja jälle pärast programmeerimisperioodi viimast aastat hõlmava lõpparuande esitamist tehtud kokkuvõte liikmesriikide poolt korraldatud ning komisjoni nimel läbi viidud juhtimis- ja kontrollisüsteemi audititest, liimesriikide poolt läbiviidud fondiabi auditite tulemustest ning vajaduse korral tehtud finantskorrektsioonidest.
(d) when the fourth annual report is submitted and again when the report covering the final year of programming is submitted, a summary of the audits on management and control systems set up by Member Sates carried out on behalf of the Commission and of the outcome of audits on Fund assistance carried out by the Member State and where appropriate the financial corrections made.
d) kokkuvõte liikmesriikide poolt korraldatud ning komisjoni nimel läbi viidud juhtimis- ja kontrollisüsteemi audititest, liimesriikide poolt läbiviidud fondiabi auditite tulemustest ning tehtud finantskorrektsioonidest.
(d) a summary of the audits on management and control systems set up by Member Sates carried out on behalf of the Commission and of the outcome of audits on Fund assistance carried out by the Member State and the financial corrections made.
Artikli 69 lõige 3 a (uus)
Article 69, paragraph 3 a (new)
Ilma et see piiraks lõigetes 1, 2 ja 3 toodud kohustuste kohaldamist, peab iga liikmesriik enne ühendusepoolse toetuse saamist aastal N ja kord aastas koostama ametliku eelneva avalikustamisaruande, milles avaldatakse, et käesoleva määrusega kehtestatud finantskontrollisüsteemid on loodud ja toimivad.
Without prejudice to the obligations laid down in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, each Member State shall issue, prior to receiving Community funding in year N and on an annual basis, a formal ex ante Disclosure Statement declaring that the financial control structures as laid down in this Regulation are in place and functioning.
Avalikustamisaruande peab allkirjastama iga liikmesriigi kõrgeim poliitiline ja korraldusasutus (rahandusminister).
The Disclosure Statement shall be signed by each Member State's highest political and managing authority (Finance Minister).
Parliament has adopted the concept of national ex ante disclosure statements in the 2003 Commission discharge exercise
Parliament has adopted the concept of national ex ante disclosure statements in the 2003 Commission discharge exercise
European Parliament Resolution of 12 April 2005, P6_TA-PROV(2005)0092 , paragraph 21.
European Parliament Resolution of 12 April 2005, P6_TA-PROV(2005)0092 , paragraph 21. .
Inés Ayala Sender, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Petr Duchoň, Szabolcs Fazakas, Ingeborg Gräßle, Véronique Mathieu, Jan Mulder, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiute, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Inés Ayala Sender, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Petr Duchoň, Szabolcs Fazakas, Ingeborg Gräßle, Véronique Mathieu, Jan Mulder, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
The proposal establishes a new European Fisheries Fund (EFF) for the period 2007-2013.
The proposal establishes a new European Fisheries Fund (EFF) for the period 2007-2013.
The EFF replaces the current Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG).
The EFF replaces the current Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG).
EU funding for the EFF will amount to about 0,7 billion EURO per year for 2007-2013.
EU funding for the EFF will amount to about 0,7 billion EURO per year for 2007-2013.
Three-quarters of this budget will be allocated to the regions lagging most behind.
Three-quarters of this budget will be allocated to the regions lagging most behind.
The proposal brings EU funding for the fisheries sector in line with the on-going reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), agreed by the Council in December 2002.
The proposal brings EU funding for the fisheries sector in line with the on-going reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), agreed by the Council in December 2002.
The new fund intends to help implementing the major changes under this reform such as reducing fishing pressure, in order to allow recovery of fish stocks and diversifying economic activities in fishing areas.
The new fund intends to help implementing the major changes under this reform such as reducing fishing pressure, in order to allow recovery of fish stocks and diversifying economic activities in fishing areas.
The European Fisheries Fund will be in line with the new approach guiding EU funding, which simplifies the programming and assistance mechanisms.
The European Fisheries Fund will be in line with the new approach guiding EU funding, which simplifies the programming and assistance mechanisms.
The Community will establish strategic guidelines, which serve as a framework for the preparation and implementation of the Fund.
The Community will establish strategic guidelines, which serve as a framework for the preparation and implementation of the Fund.
The main principles guiding the fund will remain unchanged: multi-annual programming, partnership, co-financing, subsidiarity, proportionality and shared management.
The main principles guiding the fund will remain unchanged: multi-annual programming, partnership, co-financing, subsidiarity, proportionality and shared management.
The new EFF sets four main objectives, also called priority axes:
The new EFF sets four main objectives, also called priority axes:
Adjustment of fishing effort and better protection for the marine environment
Adjustment of fishing effort and better protection for the marine environment
Aquaculture, processing and marketing
Aquaculture, processing and marketing
Promoting collective interests such as measures intended to protect the aquatic fauna, fishing ports and development of new markets
Promoting collective interests such as measures intended to protect the aquatic fauna, fishing ports and development of new markets
Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas
Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas
It is up to the Member States to decide which mix of measures suits their regions best.
It is up to the Member States to decide which mix of measures suits their regions best.
Draftman's remarks
Draftsman’s remarks
The Committee on Regional Development welcomes the proposal, since it strengthens its links with Regional Policy and is likely to make an increased contribution to cohesion.
The Committee on Regional Development welcomes the proposal, since it strengthens its links with Regional Policy and is likely to make an increased contribution to cohesion.
Coastal regions with fishing activities suffer from territorial disadvantages, since they are often located in the periphery.
Coastal regions with fishing activities suffer from territorial disadvantages, since they are often located in the periphery.
This has a negative impact on their economic development, in particular when it comes to diversifying economic activities.
This has a negative impact on their economic development, in particular when it comes to diversifying economic activities.
The four priorities of the fund, in particular measures of collective interest and sustainable development of coastal fishing areas, will make a contribution to improving the economic situation of coastal fishing areas.
The four priorities of the fund, in particular measures of collective interest and sustainable development of coastal fishing areas, will make a contribution to improving the economic situation of coastal fishing areas.
Importance of measures for diversification
Importance of measures for diversification
The overriding concern of the EFF, as well as for every other EU policy, must be the provision of sustainable jobs.
The overriding concern of the EFF, as well as for every other EU policy, must be the provision of sustainable jobs.
Diversification of economic activities in those areas is heavily needed following an average loss of 8.000 jobs a year in the EU catching sector.
Diversification of economic activities in those areas is heavily needed following an average loss of 8.000 jobs a year in the EU catching sector.
Priority axis 4 ("Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas") is mainly directed towards diversification of economic activities.
Priority axis 4 ("Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas") is mainly directed towards diversification of economic activities.
The promotion of multiple employment for people actively employed in the fisheries sector through the creation of additional or replacement jobs outside the fisheries sector should be given more emphasis in the proposal.
The promotion of multiple employment for people actively employed in the fisheries sector through the creation of additional or replacement jobs outside the fisheries sector should be given more emphasis in the proposal.
"Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas" key for complementing Regional Policy
"Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas" key for complementing Regional Policy
Not only is axis 4 best suited to providing a stimulus for sustainable employment opportunities outside the fisheries sector, it also plays an important role in complementing Regional Policy.
Not only is axis 4 best suited to providing a stimulus for sustainable employment opportunities outside the fisheries sector, it also plays an important role in complementing Regional Policy.
The new EFF, in particular axis 4, can provide the stimulus needed to maintain economic viability of coastal areas, in particular those over-reliant on fisheries economies, which are smaller than NUTS III.
The new EFF, in particular axis 4, can provide the stimulus needed to maintain economic viability of coastal areas, in particular those over-reliant on fisheries economies, which are smaller than NUTS III.
These areas are too small to be precisely targeted by cohesion policy and suffer persistent disadvantage due to a lack of commitment to cohesion at national level.
These areas are too small to be precisely targeted by cohesion policy and suffer persistent disadvantage due to a lack of commitment to cohesion at national level.
Securing sufficient resources for "Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas"
Securing sufficient resources for "Sustainable development of coastal fishing areas"
Given the outermost importance of the priority programming axis 4 for cohesion and sustainable employment, the proposal should set minimum amounts designated for each of the four different priority axes.
Given the outermost importance of the priority programming axis 4 for cohesion and sustainable employment, the proposal should set minimum amounts designated for each of the four different priority axes.
Even though it is necessary to leave sufficient flexibility to Member States to decide which measures match best their needs, the EU should ensure that no programming axis, in particular priority axis 4, would be neglected.
Even though it is necessary to leave sufficient flexibility to Member States to decide which measures match best their needs, the EU should ensure that no programming axis, in particular priority axis 4, would be neglected.
Setting a minimum programme funding for the axis 4, and eventually for all the different programming priorities, would increase coherence with the proposal for a European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, which sets minimum programme funding for each priority.
Setting a minimum programme funding for the axis 4, and eventually for all the different programming priorities, would increase coherence with the proposal for a European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, which sets minimum programme funding for each priority.
A strict budgetary minimum rather than sufficient resources
A strict budgetary minimum rather than sufficient resources
Furthermore, the proposal does not foresee any increase in expenditure for fisheries funding for 2007-2013.
Furthermore, the proposal does not foresee any increase in expenditure for fisheries funding for 2007-2013.
The increase from 4 billion EURO to 4.9 billion EURO for a programming period of 7 years is a pure extrapolation of the budget allocated to fisheries within a smaller Union of 15 Member States.
The increase from 4 billion EURO to 4.9 billion EURO for a programming period of 7 years is a pure extrapolation of the budget allocated to fisheries within a smaller Union of 15 Member States.
This amount should be considered as the strict minimum necessary, in order to ensure that the EFF will make a positive contribution to cohesion, given that the new Fisheries Policy to fight depletion of stocks will demand important adjustments from the coastal regions dependent on fisheries economies.
This amount should be considered as the strict minimum necessary, in order to ensure that the EFF will make a positive contribution to cohesion, given that the new Fisheries Policy to fight depletion of stocks will demand important adjustments from the coastal regions dependent on fisheries economies.
Regionaalarengukomisjon palub vastutaval kalanduskomisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(9) Fondi tegevus ja tema poolt rahastatavad tegevused peaksid olema kooskõlas ühenduse muu poliitikaga ja kõigi ühenduse õigusaktidega.
(9) The activity of the Fund and the operations it helps finance should be compatible with the other Community policies and comply with Community legislation;
(9) Fondi tegevus ja tema poolt rahastatavad tegevused peaksid olema kooskõlas ühenduse muu poliitikaga, täiendades eriti regionaalpoliitikat, ja kõigi ühenduse õigusaktidega.
(9) The activity of the Fund and the operations it helps finance should be compatible with the other Community policies, complementing in particular regional policy, and comply with Community legislation;
The European Fisheries Fund plays an important role in complementing Regional Policy at a micro level in areas disadvantaged due to their peripheral situation.
The European Fisheries Fund plays an important role in complementing Regional Policy at a micro level in areas disadvantaged due to their peripheral situation.
( 10) Ühenduse tegevus peaks liikmesriigi tegevust täiendama või sellele kaasa aitama ning selleks, et lisandväärtust oluliselt suurendada, tuleb tugevdada partnerlust.
(10) Action by the Community should be complementary to that carried out by the Member states or seek to contribute to it and in order to ensure significant added value, partnership should be strengthened.
( 24) Tarvis on tagada ühise kalanduspoliitikaga kaasnevad meetmed, eelkõige need, mis vähendavad rannavööndite arengupoliitika abil ühise kalanduspoliitika sotsiaalmajanduslikku mõju.
(24) The need to provide accompanying measures for CFP, in particular, reducing its socio-economic impact by implementing a coastal zone development policy;
Käesoleva määrusega asutatakse Euroopa Kalandusfond (edaspidi nimetatud “fondiks”) ja määratletakse ühenduse toetuse raamistik kalandussektori ja rannalähedaste kalapüügivööndite säästvaks arenguks.
This Regulation establishes a European Fisheries Fund (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Fund’) and defines the framework for Community support for the sustainable development of the fisheries sector and coastal fisheries zones.
Käesoleva määrusega asutatakse Euroopa Kalandusfond (edaspidi nimetatud “fondiks”) ja määratletakse ühenduse toetuse raamistik kalandussektori , akvakultuuride ja rannalähedaste kalapüügivööndite säästvaks arenguks.
This Regulation establishes a European Fisheries Fund (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Fund’) and defines the framework for Community support for the sustainable development of the fisheries sector , aquaculture and coastal fisheries zones.
I suggest that financial support from the EC also cover aquaculture, which is important for the successful management of aquatic areas.
I suggest that financial support from the EC also cover aquaculture, which is important for the successful management of aquatic areas.
( e) akvakultuur- veeorganismide kasvatamine, kasutades kõnesolevate organismide toodangu suurendamiseks väljatöötatud tehnikaid väljaspool keskkonna loomulikku tootmisvõimsust; organismid jäävad füüsilise või juriidilise isiku omandiks kogu kasvatamisperioodi vältel, kaasa arvatud saagi koristamine;
(e) “aquaculture” means the rearing or cultivation of aquatic organisms using techniques designed to increase the production of the organisms in question beyond the natural capacity of the environment; the organisms remain the property of a natural or legal person throughout the rearing or culture stage, up to and including harvesting ;
e) akvakultuur- veeorganismide kasvatamine, kasutades kõnesolevate organismide toodangu suurendamiseks väljatöötatud tehnikaid väljaspool keskkonna loomulikku tootmisvõimsust; seda peaks toetama üksnes määral, mis ei ole keskkonnale kahjulik ; organismid jäävad füüsilise või juriidilise isiku omandiks kogu kasvatamisperioodi vältel, kaasa arvatud saagi koristamine;
(e) “aquaculture” means the rearing or cultivation of aquatic organisms using techniques designed to increase the production of the organisms in question beyond the natural capacity of the environment; it should be supported only in so far as it is not detrimental to the environment; the organisms remain the property of a natural or legal person throughout the rearing or culture stage, up to and including harvesting ;
Artikkel 18 a (uus)
Article 18 a (new)
Artikkel 18 a
Article 18a
Ühenduse rahaline toetus IV peatüki IV jaotises toodud prioriteedile 4 ja eriti artiklis 43 toodud abikõlblikule meetmele hõlmab vähemalt 25% fondi kogutoetusest igale riiklikule programmile.
The Community financial contribution to priority axis 4 referred to in Title IV, Chapter IV, and in particular to the eligible measure referred to in Article 43, shall cover at least 25% of the Fund's total contribution to each national programme.
Given the outermost importance of the priority programming axis 4 for cohesion and sustainable employment, a minimum funding for this axis should be ensured.
Given the utmost importance of the priority programming axis 4 for cohesion and sustainable employment, a minimum funding for this axis should be ensured.