natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ba) hiljemalt 36 kuud pärast määruse (EMÜ) nr…. jõustumist on kohustuslik varustada kõik sõidukid, millele kohaldub käesolev määrus sõidumeerikutega vastavalt määruse 2135/98 (EÜ) lisale .
"(ba) No later than 36 months after the entry into force of Regulation (EEC) ..... * , all vehicles falling within the scope of this Regulation must be fitted with recording equipment in accordance with the requirements of Annex IB to Regulation (EC) No 2135/98."
This amendment reintroduces the position at first reading with regard to the compulsory fitting of the new digital recording equipment to all vehicles.
This amendment reintroduces the position at first reading with regard to the compulsory fitting of the new digital recording equipment to all vehicles.
ARTIKLI 27 PUNKT 2
ARTICLE 27, POINT 2
" Liikmesriigid võtavad vajalikud meetmed, et tagada oma suutelisus anda välja juhikaarte välja andma hiljemalt 5.maiks 2005 ."
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that they are able to issue driver cards at the latest on 5 May 2005 ."
Liikmesriigid võtavad vajalikud meetmed, et tagada oma suutelisus anda välja juhikaarte hiljemalt kaks kuud päras määruse (EMÜ)nr… jõustumist. "
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that they are able to issue driver cards at the latest two months after the entry into force of Regulation (EEC) .... ."
Since it cannot yet be predicted when the legislative procedure will be completed, the above wording seems more appropriate than the arbitrary setting of a date which may already have been superseded by the time the Regulation comes into force.
Since it cannot yet be predicted when the legislative procedure will be completed, the above wording seems more appropriate than the arbitrary setting of a date which may already have been superseded by the time the Regulation comes into force.
As part of the codecision procedure, on 14 January 2003 Parliament concluded its first reading on the Commission’s proposal on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport ( COM(2001)0573 .
As part of the codecision procedure, on 14 January 2003 Parliament concluded its first reading on the Commission’s proposal on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport ( COM(2001)0573 .
This proposal abrogates Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 and replaces it with a new regulation.
This proposal abrogates Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 and replaces it with a new regulation.
The Commission’s aim is to clarify, simplify and update the rules contained in the current Regulation.
The Commission’s aim is to clarify, simplify and update the rules contained in the current Regulation.
The Commission is seeking to define the scope of the provisions more clearly, firstly by setting out more comprehensively when the AETR (European Agreement concerning the Work of Crews of Vehicles engaged in International Road Transport) and when the regulation should apply, and secondly by setting out the categories of goods and passenger vehicles affected (goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes and passenger vehicles suitable for carrying over 9 persons).
The Commission is seeking to define the scope of the provisions more clearly, firstly by setting out more comprehensively when the AETR (European Agreement concerning the Work of Crews of Vehicles engaged in International Road Transport) and when the regulation should apply, and secondly by setting out the categories of goods and passenger vehicles affected (goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes and passenger vehicles suitable for carrying over 9 persons).
The number of current exceptions is also reduced in order to reflect changes in the road transport sector.
The number of current exceptions is also reduced in order to reflect changes in the road transport sector.
Definitive definitions are given in the proposal for the concepts used in the existing Regulation, in order to avoid different individual interpretations, which in the past have led to legal action.
Definitive definitions are given in the proposal for the concepts used in the existing Regulation, in order to avoid different individual interpretations, which in the past have led to legal action.
In addition, the obligations of employees and employers have been laid down more clearly, with the primary aim of ensuring that they are able to be enforced more effectively.
In addition, the obligations of employees and employers have been laid down more clearly, with the primary aim of ensuring that they are able to be enforced more effectively.
A new and important element introduced by this proposal is the possibility of applying the regulation extraterritorially.
A new and important element introduced by this proposal is the possibility of applying the regulation extraterritorially.
Member States will be able to impose penalties for infringements of the provisions of the regulation committed by drivers in another Member State.
Member States will be able to impose penalties for infringements of the provisions of the regulation committed by drivers in another Member State.
First reading - The most important amendments by Parliament
First reading - The most important amendments by Parliament
The most important amendments tabled by Parliament to the Commission proposal are as follows:
The most important amendments tabled by Parliament to the Commission proposal are as follows:
- It has formulated new definitions or made definitions in the proposal more precise in order to achieve greater legal certainty and flexibility for all those involved in road transport.
- It has formulated new definitions or made definitions in the proposal more precise in order to achieve greater legal certainty and flexibility for all those involved in road transport.
It should be noted that a number of terms used in the proposal are either not defined at all (for example, a definition of 'driving time'), or not adequately defined.
It should be noted that a number of terms used in the proposal are either not defined at all (for example, a definition of 'driving time'), or not adequately defined.
The definition of regular daily rest periods, for example, as proposed by Parliament (12 hours), allows greater flexibility, since it may be divided into two periods (9 and 3 hours).
The definition of regular daily rest periods, for example, as proposed by Parliament (12 hours), allows greater flexibility, since it may be divided into two periods (9 and 3 hours).
- The derogations both at Community and at national level have been clarified in order to meet the requirements of road safety and fair competition.
- The derogations both at Community and at national level have been clarified in order to meet the requirements of road safety and fair competition.
At the same time exceptions have been added in order to take into account the special character of certain services (postal services) or special situation of certain businesses (milk producers).
At the same time exceptions have been added in order to take into account the special character of certain services (postal services) or special situation of certain businesses (milk producers).
The concept of the flexible week has been abolished, in order to be consistent with the Directive on working time in road transport (2002/15/EC).
The concept of the flexible week has been abolished, in order to be consistent with the Directive on working time in road transport (2002/15/EC).
The flexible week has been replaced by the calendar week.
The flexible week has been replaced by the calendar week.
- The provisions contained in the current regulation on the minimum age for long-distance drivers are reintroduced.
- The provisions contained in the current regulation on the minimum age for long-distance drivers are reintroduced.
- A system of harmonised penalties is introduced which respects the requirement of non-discrimination and under which penalties are divided into different categories according to the severity of the infringement.
- A system of harmonised penalties is introduced which respects the requirement of non-discrimination and under which penalties are divided into different categories according to the severity of the infringement.
- Application of the Regulation to transportation by vehicles registered in a third country which is not a contracting party to the AETR agreement for the section of the route lying within Community territory.
- Application of the Regulation to transportation by vehicles registered in a third country which is not a contracting party to the AETR agreement for the section of the route lying within Community territory.
This prevents distortions of competition.
This prevents distortions of competition.
- The Commission is required to submit a proposal at the latest six months after the publication of the regulation which provides, inter alia, for the mandatory fitting of all vehicles covered by this regulation with an electric tachograph at the latest 36 months after its entry into force.
- The Commission is required to submit a proposal at the latest six months after the publication of the regulation which provides, inter alia, for the mandatory fitting of all vehicles covered by this regulation with an electric tachograph at the latest 36 months after its entry into force.
The core elements of the Council's common position
The core elements of the Council's common position
A scrutiny of the common position leads your rapporteur to the conclusion that the Council has essentially respected the spirit of the Commission proposal and has also taken Parliament's opinion fully into account.
A scrutiny of the common position leads your rapporteur to the conclusion that the Council has essentially respected the spirit of the Commission proposal and has also taken Parliament's opinion fully into account.
The following aspects of the common position differ from existing legislation:
The following aspects of the common position differ from existing legislation:
- The minimum uninterrupted daily rest period is increased from 8 to 9 hours;
- The minimum uninterrupted daily rest period is increased from 8 to 9 hours;
- The maximum driving time per calendar week is reduced to 56 hours (according to the existing Regulation 76 hours are allowed);
- The maximum driving time per calendar week is reduced to 56 hours (according to the existing Regulation 76 hours are allowed);
- During two consecutive weeks, the driver must take at least one regular weekly rest period consisting of an uninterrupted period of at least 45 hours;
- During two consecutive weeks, the driver must take at least one regular weekly rest period consisting of an uninterrupted period of at least 45 hours;
- A legal framework is created under which Member States may impose penalties, for example they may immobilise temporarily a vehicle, withdraw, suspend or restrict an undertaking's licence or a driver's driving licence.
- A legal framework is created under which Member States may impose penalties, for example they may immobilise temporarily a vehicle, withdraw, suspend or restrict an undertaking's licence or a driver's driving licence.
These penalties may be imposed even in cases of extraterritoriality.
These penalties may be imposed even in cases of extraterritoriality.
- The number of derogations at Community level is reduced;
- The number of derogations at Community level is reduced;
- Under certain conditions third parties (consignors, freight forwarders and tour operators) may be held liable for infringements of this regulation.
- Under certain conditions third parties (consignors, freight forwarders and tour operators) may be held liable for infringements of this regulation.
Finally, there is a new point in the common position which satisfies Parliament's and the Commission's demands.
Finally, there is a new point in the common position which satisfies Parliament's and the Commission's demands.
The Council has amended Regulation 3821/85/EC on digital tachographs so that inspectors are now able to check the periods up to 15 days before the current week.
The Council has amended Regulation 3821/85/EC on digital tachographs so that inspectors are now able to check the periods up to 15 days before the current week.
From 2008 this period will be increased to 28 days.
From 2008 this period will be increased to 28 days.
There are also plans to introduce the digital control equipment from 5 August 2005.
There are also plans to introduce the digital control equipment from 5 August 2005.
A comparison between Parliament's position in first reading and the common position shows clearly that the Council has taken on board a substantial number of Parliament's amendments.
A comparison between Parliament's position in first reading and the common position shows clearly that the Council has taken on board a substantial number of Parliament's amendments.
A number of amendments may be mentioned which are important for our committee: for example, the replacement of the flexible week by the calendar week (Amendments 1 and 33); the fact that a weekly rest period that falls in two weeks may now only be counted for one of the two weeks (44); the obligation for other links in the transport chain to comply with the regulation (48); the fact that Member States are entitled to exempt postal delivery (54) and the transport of animal waste (58) at national level from the scope of the regulation; the obligation of undertakings to preserve all data relevant for the application of the regulation over a period of one year (62) and, finally, the possibility of taking a vehicle into safekeeping in the event of serious infringements (65).
A number of amendments may be mentioned which are important for our committee: for example, the replacement of the flexible week by the calendar week (Amendments 1 and 33); the fact that a weekly rest period that falls in two weeks may now only be counted for one of the two weeks (44); the obligation for other links in the transport chain to comply with the regulation (48); the fact that Member States are entitled to exempt postal delivery (54) and the transport of animal waste (58) at national level from the scope of the regulation; the obligation of undertakings to preserve all data relevant for the application of the regulation over a period of one year (62) and, finally, the possibility of taking a vehicle into safekeeping in the event of serious infringements (65).
The Council also partially accepted Parliament's proposal that the regular daily rest periods may be taken in two parts consisting of 9 and 3 hours respectively (31).
The Council also partially accepted Parliament's proposal that the regular daily rest periods may be taken in two parts consisting of 9 and 3 hours respectively (31).
The Council also views it as a compromise that reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in the vehicle.
The Council also views it as a compromise that reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in the vehicle.
It is recalled that Parliament provides for this measure only in the case of daily rest periods (107).
It is recalled that Parliament provides for this measure only in the case of daily rest periods (107).
The derogations provided for in Amendments 23 and 24 (transport of dairy products, special sewerage vehicles, etc.) are only allowed at national level, instead of at Community level.
The derogations provided for in Amendments 23 and 24 (transport of dairy products, special sewerage vehicles, etc.) are only allowed at national level, instead of at Community level.
On the other hand, the Council has rejected a number of important amendments by Parliament: for example, the changes referring to the AETR agreement, the definition of driving time (29) and the minimum age for long-distance drivers (35).
On the other hand, the Council has rejected a number of important amendments by Parliament: for example, the changes referring to the AETR agreement, the definition of driving time (29) and the minimum age for long-distance drivers (35).
The Council has also rejected the amendment on the common range of penalties (64).
The Council has also rejected the amendment on the common range of penalties (64).
In order to ensure that Parliament's position is taken on board, your rapporteur intends to reintroduce the core amendments from the first reading which were not adopted by the Council.
In order to ensure that Parliament's position is taken on board, your rapporteur intends to reintroduce the core amendments from the first reading which were not adopted by the Council.
Nevertheless, your rapporteur considers it important to stress that, despite existing differences, it might be possible to conclude this matter in second reading.
Nevertheless, your rapporteur considers it important to stress that, despite existing differences, it might be possible to conclude this matter in second reading.
As part of negotiations with the Council an attempt will be made to achieve a compromise in order to avoid conciliation and to accelerate the entry into force of this regulation.
As part of negotiations with the Council an attempt will be made to achieve a compromise in order to avoid conciliation and to accelerate the entry into force of this regulation.
This regulation is an attempt to enhance road safety, ensure fair competition and protect the social interests of persons involved in road transport .
This regulation is an attempt to enhance road safety, ensure fair competition and protect the social interests of persons involved in road transport .
Both institutions have a duty to act as swiftly as possible to meet those three objectives.
Both institutions have a duty to act as swiftly as possible to meet those three objectives.
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu teatavate autovedusid käsitlevate sotsiaalõigusnormide ühtlustamist käsitleva määruse vastuvõtmiseks, millega muudetakse nõukogu määruseid (EMÜ) nr 3821/85 ja (EÜ) nr 2135/98
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98
EÜ art 251 lg 2 ja art 71
Articles 251(2) and 71
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Sa?d El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Fernand Le Rachinel, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Fernand Le Rachinel, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Bulgaaria Vabariigi avalduse kohta saada Euroopa Liidu liikmeks
on the application by the Republic of Bulgaria to become a member of the European Union
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development .....9
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...10
– võttes arvesse Bulgaaria Vabariigi poolt 14. detsembril 1995 esitatud Euroopa Liiduga ühinemise avaldust;
– having regard to the application for accession to the European Union submitted by the Republic of Bulgaria on 14 December 1995,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni 1997. aasta arvamust Bulgaaria Vabariigi avalduse kohta saada Euroopa Liidu liikmeks;
– having regard to the Commission's opinion of 1997 on the Republic of Bulgaria's application to become a member of the European Union,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni korralisi aruandeid Bulgaaria Vabariigi edusammude kohta ühinemise suunas aastatel 1998–2004 ja strateegiadokumenti laienemisprotsessi edu kohta ( KOM(2004)0657 – C6-0150/2004 );
– having regard to the Commission's Regular Reports on the Republic of Bulgaria's progress towards accession covering the years from 1998 to 2004 and its Strategy Paper on progress in the enlargement process ( COM(2004)0657 – C6-0150/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse 16.–17. detsembril 2004 Brüsselis toimunud Euroopa Ülemkogu kohtumisel tehtud eesistujariigi järeldusi;
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 16-17 December 2004,
– võttes arvesse kõiki tema resolutsioone ja aruandeid alates ühinemisläbirääkimiste algusest kuni praeguseni;
– having regard to all its resolutions and reports since the beginning of the accession negotiations to date,
– võttes arvesse komisjoni 22. veebruari 2005. aasta arvamust Bulgaaria ja Rumeenia Vabariigi Euroopa Liiduga ühinemise avalduse kohta ( KOM(2005)0055 );
– having regard to the Commission Opinion of 22 February 2005 on the applications for accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania ( COM(2005)0055 ),
– võttes arvesse Bulgaaria ja Rumeenia Vabariigi Euroopa Liiduga ühinemise lepingu projekti;
– having regard to the draft treaty on accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union,
– võttes arvesse välisasjade komisjoni raportit ja põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjon arvamust ( A6-0078/2005 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Agricultural and Rural Development ( A6‑0078/2005 ),
A. arvestades, et Bulgaaria esitas Euroopa Liiduga ühinemise avalduse 14. detsembril 1995, kuulutati ametlikult kandidaadiks 16. juulil 1997, alustas läbirääkimisi 15. veebruaril 2000 ja lõpetas ühinemisläbirääkimised edukalt 14. detsembril 2004;
A. whereas Bulgaria applied to join the European Union on 14 December 1995, was formally recognised as a candidate on 16 July 1997, opened negotiations on 15 February 2000 and successfully concluded its accession negotiations on 14 December 2004,
B arvestades, et meie ühine eesmärk on, et Bulgaaria lõpetaks rahuldavalt ettevalmistused ühinemislepingu allkirjastamiseks 25. aprillil 2005 ja ühinemiseks 1. jaanuaril 2007;
B. whereas our common objective is that Bulgaria should satisfactorily complete its preparations with a view to signature of the Accession Treaty on 25 April 2005 and accession on 1 January 2007,
C. arvestades, et Bulgaaria jätkab poliitiliste kriteeriumide täitmist ja eeldatavasti suudab täita kõik liikmesuse nõuded ettenähtud ajalises raamistikus;
C. whereas Bulgaria continues to fulfil the political criteria and is expected to be able to comply with all the requirements for membership within the envisaged timeframe,
5. tunnustab Bulgaaria panust Kagu-Euroopa piirkonna stabiilsusesse ja jätkuvasse rolli, mida ta mängib piirkonna julgeoleku ja jõukuse edendamisele kaasaaitamisel.
Recognises Bulgaria's contribution to the stability of the wider south-east European region and the continuing role that she can play in helping to promote regional security and prosperity;
7. ootab, et Euroopa Komisjon esitaks Euroopa Parlamendile korrapäraselt aruandeid Bulgaaria võetud kohustuste ellurakendamise kohta, samuti ootab, et parlamendi seisukohaga arvestataks juhul, kui kavatsetakse kohaldada kaitseklauslit;
Expects the Commission to report to Parliament at regular intervals on the progress made in implementing Bulgaria’s commitments, and expects Parliament's opinion to be taken into account in the event that the safeguard clause is considered to be invoked;