natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Your rapporteur stresses that the EGCC must confine its activities to carrying out specific tasks .
Your rapporteur stresses that the EGCC must confine its activities to carrying out specific tasks .
The EGCC acts in performance of the tasks delegated to it, which may be assigned to one of its members.
The EGCC acts in performance of the tasks delegated to it, which may be assigned to one of its members.
Moreover, the EGCC must exist as a legal entity (with or without legal personality) by virtue of binding national legislation such as the law on associations (amendments 19, 21 and 31) .
Moreover, the EGCC must exist as a legal entity (with or without legal personality) by virtue of binding national legislation such as the law on associations (amendments 19, 21 and 31) .
Setting up the EGCC : The Commission proposal offers two possibilities (Article 2(3) of the Commission proposal):
Setting up the EGCC : The Commission proposal offers two possibilities (Article 2(3) of the Commission proposal):
- the members of the EGCC can set it up as a separate legal entity if they wish, in which case the EGCC itself carries out the relevant cross-border cooperation tasks, or
- the members of the EGCC can set it up as a separate legal entity if they wish, in which case the EGCC itself carries out the relevant cross-border cooperation tasks, or
- the members set up an EGCC and the EGCC decides, according to its own decision-making system, to delegate to a regional or local authority which is a member of the EGCC the tasks of the EGCC.
- the members set up an EGCC and the EGCC decides, according to its own decision-making system, to delegate to a regional or local authority which is a member of the EGCC the tasks of the EGCC.
This authority will then carry out the tasks delegated to the EGCC.
This authority will then carry out the tasks delegated to the EGCC.
Your rapporteur considers that the text should not state that members ‘can decide to set up the’ EGCC in accordance with one of these two options, but that they ‘set up’ the EGCC (amendment 18) .
Your rapporteur considers that the text should not state that members ‘can decide to set up the’ EGCC in accordance with one of these two options, but that they ‘set up’ the EGCC (amendment 18) .
Ø The tasks and competencies of the EGCC must be specified by its members in a convention of European cross-border cooperation (Article 4 of the Commission proposal).
Ø The tasks and competencies of the EGCC must be specified by its members in a convention of European cross-border cooperation (Article 4 of the Commission proposal).
Your rapporteur considers that the EGCC is the subject of the convention of European cross-border cooperation drawn up by its members (amendment 25).
Your rapporteur considers that the EGCC is the subject of the convention of European cross-border cooperation drawn up by its members (amendment 25).
Ø The convention specifies:
Ø The convention specifies:
- the tasks of the EGCC, its duration and the conditions for its dissolution(Article 4(2))
- the tasks of the EGCC, its duration and the conditions for its dissolution(Article 4(2))
- the responsibilities of each of the members with respect to the EGCC and with respect to third parties (Article 4(4));
- the responsibilities of each of the members with respect to the EGCC and with respect to third parties (Article 4(4));
- the law applicable to its interpretation and enforcement (Article 4(5)).
- the law applicable to its interpretation and enforcement (Article 4(5)).
The applicable law is that of one of the Member States concerned, either by virtue of its participation in the EGCC, or by virtue of the participation of a local authority or public body situated on the territory of that Member State.
The applicable law is that of one of the Member States concerned, either by virtue of its participation in the EGCC, or by virtue of the participation of a local authority or public body situated on the territory of that Member State.
It may also be the law of the Member State where the EGCC has its seat;
It may also be the law of the Member State where the EGCC has its seat;
- the modalities of mutual recognition with regard to control (Article 4(6));
- the modalities of mutual recognition with regard to control (Article 4(6));
in addition, the convention must be notified to all its members and to the Member States involved (Article 4(8)).
in addition, the convention must be notified to all its members and to the Member States involved (Article 4(8)).
Your rapporteur considers that:
Your rapporteur considers that:
- Article 4(2): the Convention must specify, in particular (the list is not exhaustive) the operating principles of the EGCC , the tasks of the EGCC , its duration and the conditions for its dissolution (amendment 26);
- Article 4(2): the Convention must specify, in particular (the list is not exhaustive) the operating principles of the EGCC , the tasks of the EGCC , its duration and the conditions for its dissolution (amendment 26);
- Article 4(4): the question of the responsibilities of each of the members is adequately covered by Article 7(2) concerning the responsibilities of the Member States (amendment 28);
- Article 4(4): the question of the responsibilities of each of the members is adequately covered by Article 7(2) concerning the responsibilities of the Member States (amendment 28);
- Article 4(6): the modalities of mutual recognition as regards the right of supervision should be specified in the text of the regulation itself, not in the convention.
- Article 4(6): the modalities of mutual recognition as regards the right of supervision should be specified in the text of the regulation itself, not in the convention.
Your rapporteur proposes, therefore, adding a new paragraph to Article 1(3) on this subject (see amendment 16) (amendment 30);
Your rapporteur proposes, therefore, adding a new paragraph to Article 1(3) on this subject (see amendment 16) (amendment 30);
- the law applying to the EGCC should be the law governing associations in the Member State concerned (amendment 31);
- the law applying to the EGCC should be the law governing associations in the Member State concerned (amendment 31);
- Article 4(8): the Convention should also be notified to the Committee of the Regions (amendment 33).
- Article 4(8): the Convention should also be notified to the Committee of the Regions (amendment 33).
Ø The EGCC shall adopt its statutes (Article 5 of the Commission proposal) and equip itself with its own organs (Article 6 of the Commission proposal) .
Ø The EGCC shall adopt its statutes (Article 5 of the Commission proposal) and equip itself with its own organs (Article 6 of the Commission proposal) .
The EGCC always has a director.
The EGCC always has a director.
However, the EGCC is free to decide whether to equip itself with an assembly consisting of representatives of its members or of other bodies.
However, the EGCC is free to decide whether to equip itself with an assembly consisting of representatives of its members or of other bodies.
- Your rapporteur considers that the statutes should also include provisions concerning the r epresentation of the EGCC, including an assembly consisting of representatives of its members and an executive committee (amendment 34).
- Your rapporteur considers that the statutes should also include provisions concerning the r epresentation of the EGCC, including an assembly consisting of representatives of its members and an executive committee (amendment 34).
To that end, he proposes deleting Article 6 on the organs of the EGCC and including those provisions in the article on the statutes of the EGCC (amendment 36) .
To that end, he proposes deleting Article 6 on the organs of the EGCC and including those provisions in the article on the statutes of the EGCC (amendment 36) .
Ø The setting up of the EGCC is announced in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ø The setting up of the EGCC is announced in the Official Journal of the European Union.
As of that instant, the legal capacity of the EGCC is recognised in each Member State ( Article 7 of the Commission proposal) .
As of that instant, the legal capacity of the EGCC is recognised in each Member State ( Article 7 of the Commission proposal) .
Your rapporteur considers that, once the EGCC has been invested with legal personality in accordance with the applicable national law in the Member State concerned, the statutes setting up the EGCC should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union (amendment 37).
Your rapporteur considers that, once the EGCC has been invested with legal personality in accordance with the applicable national law in the Member State concerned, the statutes setting up the EGCC should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union (amendment 37).
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus Euroopa piiriülese koostöö rühmituse (EPKR) asutamise kohta
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a European grouping of cross-border cooperation (EGCC)
art 251 lg 2 ja art 159 lg 3 (EÜ)
Articles 251(2) and 159(3) TEC
Alfredo Antoniozzi, Inés Ayala Sender, Jan Březina, Simon Busuttil, Den Dover, Mojca Drčar Murko, Richard Falbr, Věra Flasarová, Louis Grech, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Richard Seeber, Thomas Ulmer
Alfredo Antoniozzi, Inés Ayala Sender, Jan Březina, Simon Busuttil, Den Dover, Mojca Drčar Murko, Richard Falbr, Věra Flasarová, Louis Grech, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Richard Seeber, Thomas Ulmer
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht eesmärgiga võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv arvutil põhinevate leiutiste patenditavuse kohta
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
EXPOSE DES MOTIFS............................................................................................................21
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................22
nõukogu ühise seisukoha kohta eesmärgiga võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv arvutil põhinevate leiutiste patenditavuse kohta
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
– võttes arvesse nõukogu ühist seisukohta (11979/1/2004 – C6‑0058/2005 );
– having regard to the Council common position (11979/1/2004 – C6‑0058/2005 ),
ELT C 077, 26.3.2004, lk 87.
OJ C 77, 26.3.2004, p.
Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule esitatud komisjoni ettepaneku ( KOM(2002)0092 )
87. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0092 )
– võttes arvesse õiguskomisjoni soovitust teisele lugemisele( A6‑0207/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0207/2005 ),
5 a) 5. oktoobril 1973. aastal Münchenis allkirjastatud Euroopa patentide väljaandmise konventsiooni sätteid, eelkõige artiklis 52 sisalduvaid patentsust määratlevaid sätteid, tuleb kinnitada ja täpsustada.
(5a) The rules of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents signed in Munich on 5 October 1973, and in particular Article 52 thereof concerning the limits to patentability, should be confirmed and clarified.
8 a) Liikmesriigid peaksid käesoleva direktiivi sätteid võtma arvesse juhul, kui nende tegevus langeb Euroopa patendikonventsiooni reguleerimisalasse.
(8a) Member States should respect the provisions of this Directive when acting within the framework of the European Patent Convention.
8 b) Euroopa patendikonventsioon näeb ette, et Euroopa Patendiameti üle teostab järelevalvet Euroopa Patendiorganisatsiooni haldusnõukogu ja Euroopa Patendiameti president peab haldusnõukogule oma tegevuse kohta aru andma.
(8b) The European Patent Convention provides that the European Patent Office is supervised by the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation, and that the President of the European Patent Office is answerable for its activities to the Administrative Council.
Haldusnõukogu koosneb Euroopa patendikonventsiooniga liitunud riikide esindajatest, kellest selge enamuse moodustavad ELi liikmesriigid.
The Administrative Council is composed of representatives of the Contracting States of the European Patent Convention, a clear majority of which is formed by Member States of the European Union.
Kõnealused esindajad peavad võtma kõik nende pädevuses olevad meetmed tagamaks, et Euroopa Patendiamet järgib käesolevat direktiivi.
These representatives should take such measures as are within their authority to ensure compliance by the European Patent Office with this Directive.
Põhjendus 10 a (uus)
Article 10 a (new)
10 a) Kui tehnilised kaalutlused aitavad kaasa tehnilise probleemi lahendamisele, siis on tehnilise panuse tingimus täidetud.
(10a) A technical contribution is present if technical considerations contribute to the solution of a technical problem.
Tehnilise panuse tingimus ei ole täidetud, kui objekti, millele patenti taotletakse, moodustavad üksnes avastused, teaduslikud teooriad, matemaatilised meetodid, esteetiline looming, äri- ja mõttetegevuse ning mängude plaanid, reeglid ja meetodid, arvutiprogrammid või info esitamine, piirdumata vaid uue, erineva ja tehnilise objektiga, mis on toodetud või mida on võimalik kasutada mingis majandustegevuse valdkonnas.
A technic al contribution is not present if the subject-matter claimed in the patent solely consists of discoveries, scientific theories, mathematical methods, aesthetic creations, schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, programs for computers, or presentations of information, without being limited to new, non-obvious and technical subject matter that can be made or used in any kind of industry.
11) Selleks et leiutist loetaks patenditavaks, peab ta olema tehnilise iseloomuga ja kuuluma seega tehnikavaldkonda.
(11) In order for any invention to be considered as patentable it should have a technical character, and thus belong to a field of technology.
Lisaks peab ta olema tööstuslikult kasutatav, uus ja omama leiutustaset.
It must also be capable of industrial application, be new, and involve an inventive step.
12) Kõigi leiutiste suhtes kehtib tingimus, et leiutustaseme omamiseks peavad leiutised andma tehnilise panuse tehnika tasemesse.
(12) It is a condition for inventions in general that, in order to involve an inventive step, they should make a technical contribution to the state of the art.
12) Kõigi leiutiste suhtes kehtib tingimus, et leiutustaseme omamiseks peavad leiutised andma uue tehnilise panuse tehnika tasemesse.
(12) It is a condition for inventions in general that, in order to involve an inventive step, they should make a new technical contribution to the state of the art.
14 a) Mõiste "andmetöötlus" käesoleva direktiivi tähenduses ei hõlma füüsikaliste mõjude kindlaks tegemist ega nende teisendamist andmeteks.
(14a) Data processing within the meaning of this Directive does not cover the identification of physical effects and their conversion into data.
15) Kui panus tehnika tasemesse on seotud üksnes mittepatenditava objektiga, ei saa olla tegemist patenditava leiutisega, sõltumata sellest, kuidas seda patendinõudluses esitatakse.
(15) If the contribution to the state of the art relates solely to unpatentable matter, there can be no patentable invention irrespective of how the matter is presented in the claims.
Näiteks, tehnilise panuse nõudest ei saa kõrvale hoida üksnes tehniliste vahendite nimetamisega patendinõudluses.
For example, the requirement for technical contribution cannot be circumvented merely by specifying technical means in the patent claims .
15) Kui panus oskuste tasemesse on seotud üksnes mittepatenditava objektiga, ei saa olla tegemist patenditava leiutisega, sõltumata sellest, kuidas seda patendinõudluses esitatakse.
(15) If the contribution to the state of the art relates solely to unpatentable matter, there can be no patentable invention irrespective of how the matter is presented in the claims.
Näiteks, tehnilise panuse nõudest ei saa kõrvale hoida üksnes tehniliste vahendite nimetamisega patendinõudluses.
For example, the requirement for technical contribution cannot be circumvented merely by specifying technical means in the patent claim .
On peut en revanche parler d'état de l'art pour les domaines non techniques.
(First part of amendment does not affect English version.)
17 a) Liikmesriigid tagavad, et kirjelduses esitatakse avastused, millele patenti taotletakse, niisugusel viisil, et tehniline probleem ja selle lahendus ning samuti leiutustase oleksid arusaadavad.
(17a) Member States shall ensure that the description discloses the invention as claimed in such terms that the technical problem and its solution as well as the inventive step can be understood.
20) Ühenduse tööstuse konkurentsivõime paraneb tema põhiliste kaubanduspartneritega võrreldes, kui olemasolevad erinevused arvutil põhinevate leiutiste õiguskaitses on kõrvaldatud ja õiguslik seisund on läbipaistev.
(20) The competitive position of Community industry in relation to its major trading partners will be improved if the current differences in the legal protection of computer-implemented inventions are eliminated and the legal situation is transparent.
Arvestades traditsioonilise töötleva tööstuse praegust suundumust viia oma tegevus väljaspool ühendust asuvatesse odavatesse majanduspiirkondadesse, on intellektuaalomandi kaitse ja eelkõige patendikaitse tähtsus iseenesest mõistetav.
With the present trend for traditional manufacturing industry to shift their operations to low-cost economies outside the Community, the importance of intellectual property protection and in particular patent protection is self-evident.
20 a) Väikesed ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtted (VKEd) on Euroopa Liidu ja selle liikmesriikide majandusliku edu ja ülemaailmse konkurentsivõimelisuse jaoks olulise tähtsusega.
(20a) Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are essential to the economic success and global competitiveness of the European Union and its Member States.
Intellektuaalomandi õigustest saavad kasu nii väikesed ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtted kui ka suuremad ettevõtted.
Intellectual property rights benefit small and medium-sized enterprises just as they do larger entities.
Tagamaks, et käesolev direktiivi teeniks VKEde huvisid, tuleks luua väikeste ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtete sektoris tehnoloogilise innovatsiooni komisjon.
To ensure that this Directive advances the interests of SMEs, a Committee on Technological Innovation in the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Sector should be formed.
See komisjon peaks eelkõige tegelema patentidega seotud ettevõtteid puudutavate küsimustega ja juhtima vajadusel Euroopa Komisjoni tähelepanu neile küsimustele.
This Committee should focus on patent-related issues relevant to such enterprises and should bring these issues to the attention of the Commission as necessary.
21) Käesoleva direktiivi sätted ei tohiks piirata asutamislepingu artiklite 81 ja 82 kohaldamist, eelkõige kui valitsevat positsiooni omav tarnija keelab patenditud meetodi kasutamise, mida on vaja üksnes kahes erinevas arvutisüsteemis või -võrgus kasutatavate reeglistike teisendamiseks, et võimaldada nendevahelist suhtlust ja andmevahetust.
(21) This Directive should be without prejudice to the application of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty , in particular where a dominant supplier refuses to allow the use of patented technique which is needed for the sole purpose of ensuring conversion of the conventions used in two different computers systems or networks so as to allow communication and exchange of data content between them .
21) Käesoleva direktiivi sätted ei tohiks piirata konkurentsieeskirjade, eelkõige asutamislepingu artiklite 81 ja 82 kohaldamist.
(21) This Directive should be without prejudice to the application of the competition rules, in particular Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty.
21 a) Patentidel on innovatsiooni edendamisel Euroopas oluline roll.
(21a) Patents play an important role in European innovation.
Tõhusa patendisüsteemi toimimise tagamiseks on tähtis jälgida arenguid antud valdkonnas, kaasa arvatud arengud arvutil põhinevate leiutiste patentide osas.
To ensure effective functioning of the patent system, it is important to monitor developments in this sector, including developments involving patents on computer-implemented inventions.
Selleks tuleks koguda asjakohaseid andmeid ja koostada kasutuskõlblikke aruandeid.
To this end, relevant data should be gathered and appropriate reports produced.
Need aruanded peaksid sisaldama teavet, mis käsitlevad konkreetselt väikeste ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtete osalust patendisüsteemis seoses arvutil põhinevate leiutistega.
Such reports should include information pertaining specifically to participation by small and medium-sized enterprises in the system of patents for computer-implemented inventions.
Käesolev direktiiv sätestab arvutil põhinevate leiutiste patenditavuse eeskirjad.
This Directive lays down rules for the patentability of computer - implemented inventions.
Käesolev direktiiv sätestab arvuti abil juhitavate leiutiste patenditavuse eeskirjad.
This Directive lays down rules concerning the patentability of computer-assisted inventions.
a) arvutil põhinev leiutis – igasugune leiutis, mille töö hõlmab arvuti, arvutivõrgu või muu programmeeritava seadme kasutamist, kusjuures leiutisel on üks või mitu tunnust, mida teostatakse täielikult või osaliselt arvutiprogrammi või -programmide abil;
(a) computer- implemented invention means any invention the performance of which involves the use of a computer, computer network or other programmable apparatus, the invention having one or more features which are realised wholly or partly by means of a computer program or computer programs ;
a) arvutitoega leiutis – igasugune leiutis, mille töö hõlmab arvuti, arvutivõrgu või muu programmeeritava seadme kasutamist;
(a) computer- aided invention means any invention the performance of which involves the use of programmable apparatus;
b) tehniline panus – tehnikavaldkonna tehnika tasemesse antav panus, mis on uus ja ei ole vastava ala asjatundja jaoks endastmõistetav.
(b) “technical contribution” means a contribution to the state of the art in a field of technology which is new and not obvious to a person skilled in the art.
Tehnilist panust hinnatakse, kaaludes erinevust tehnika taseme ja patendinõudluse tervikliku ulatuse vahel, kusjuures patendinõudlus peab sisaldama tehnilisi tunnuseid, olenemata sellest, kas nendega kaasneb mittetehnilisi tunnuseid või mitte.
The technical contribution shall be assessed by consideration of the difference between the state of the art and the scope of the patent claim considered as a whole, which must comprise technical features , irrespective of whether or not these are accompanied by non-technical features.
b) tehniline panus – tehnikavaldkonna tehnika tasemesse antav panus.
(b) “technical contribution” means a contribution to the state of the art in a field of technology.
Kõnealune panus on tunnuste kogum, mille põhjal väidetakse, et patendinõudluse terviklik ulatus erineb tehnika senisest tasemest.
The technical contribution is the set of features by which the scope of the patent claim as a whole is considered to differ from the state of the art .
Panus peab olema tehniline, st see peab sisaldama tehnilisi tunnuseid j a kuuluma tehnikavaldkonda.
The contribution must be technical, that is , comprise technical features and belong to a field of technology.
Ilma tehnilise panuseta ei ole objekt patentne ega kujuta endast leiutist.
Without a technical contribution, there is no patentable subject-matter.
Tehniline panus peab vastama patentsuse tingimustele.
The technical contribution must fulfil the conditions for patentability.
Eriti peab tehniline panus olema uus ega tohi olla endastmõistetav vastava ala asjatundja jaoks.
In particular, it must be novel and not obvious to a person skilled in the art.
Artikli 2 punkt b a (uus)
Article 2, point (b a) (new)