natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C. arvestades Andrzej Pęczaki kaebust, et tema vastu algatatud kriminaalmenetlus on vastuolus süütuse presumptsiooniga ning et tema vahistamise ja eelvangistuse tingimused piiravad tema võimet ennast kaitsta;
C. whereas Andrzej Pęczak complains that those criminal proceedings brought against him are in breach of the presumption of innocence and that the conditions of his detention and arrest limit his ability to defend himself,
D. arvestades Andrzej Pęczaki kaebust, et menetlus, mille abil Sejm temalt puutumatuse ära võttis, oli "õigustühine" ning põhines ajakirjanduses ilmunud materjalidel ning et tema poolt erinevatele isikutele (nt ombudsmanile) saadetud meetmeettepanekud ei andnud tulemust;
D. whereas Andrzej Pęczak complains that the procedure by which the Sejm waived his immunity was "legally invalid" and based on publications in the media, and that his motions for action sent to various persons (such as the Ombudsman) had no effect,
E. arvestades, et saadud teabe põhjal ei ole Andrzej Pęczakil parlamendiliikme puutumatust seoses ühegi nõudega, millele on Euroopa Parlamendi presidendi tähelepanu juhitud,
E. whereas, on basis of the information obtained, Andrzej Pęczak is not protected by parliamentary immunity in respect of any of the claims which have been drawn to the attention of the President of the European Parliament,
In conclusion, Mr Pęczak asks for the defence of his parliamentary immunity in order that he may not be prosecuted.
In conclusion, Mr Pęczak asks for the defence of his parliamentary immunity in order that he may not be prosecuted.
b) in the territory of any other Member State, immunity from any measure of detention and from legal proceedings.
b) in the territory of any other Member State , immunity from any measure of detention and from legal proceedings.
Mr Pęczak does not claim that in his letter.
Mr Pęczak does not claim that in his letter.
What is protected is Member's opinions or votes in Parliament , even when they are not physically within the premises of the House, but always when they are acting entirely as parliamentarians.
What is protected is Member's opinions or votes in Parliament , even when they are not physically within the premises of the House, but always when they are acting entirely as parliamentarians.
Article 9 is therefore not applicable to Mr. Pęczak.
Article 9 is therefore not applicable to Mr. Pęczak.
Moreover, the Polish parliament (of which he was Member since 1997, elected for his second term in 2001) has waived his national parliamentary immunity in accordance with the Polish Constitution (Art. 105 par.
Moreover, the Polish parliament (of which he was Member since 1997, elected for his second term in 2001) has waived his national parliamentary immunity in accordance with the Polish Constitution (Art. 105 par.
Moreover, it is difficult to imagine Article 10 being applicable to former Members of Parliament.
Moreover, it is difficult to imagine Article 10 being applicable to former Members of Parliament.
Euroopa Parlamendi endise liikme Andrzej Pęczaki puutumatuse ja privileegide kaitse taotlus
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Andrzej Pęczak
Giovanni Claudio Fava puutumatuse ja privileegide kaitse taotlus
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Giovanni Claudio Fava
SELGITAV SISSEJUHATUS.....................................................................................................4
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................4
– võttes arvesse Giovanni Claudio Fava 1. juulil 2005. aastal esitatud taotlust kaitsta oma saadikupuutumatust, millest anti teada 6. juuli 2005. aasta täiskogu istungil;
– having regard to the request by Giovanni Claudio Fava for defence of his immunity of 1 July 2005, announced in plenary sitting on 6 July 2005,
– olles Giovanni Claudio Fava ära kuulanud vastavalt kodukorra artikli 7 lõikele 3;
– having heard Giovanni Claudio Fava in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse 8. aprilli 1965. aasta Euroopa ühenduste privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli artikleid 9 ja 10 ning Euroopa Parlamendi liikmete valimist üldistel otsevalimistel reguleeriva 20. septembri 1976. aasta õigusakti artikli 6 lõiget 2;
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduste Kohtu 12. mai 1964. aasta ja 10. juuli 1986. aasta otsuseid
– having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Kohtuasi 101/63, Wagner v Fohrmann ja Krier , kohtulahendite kogumik 1964, lk 195, ja kohtuasi 149/85, Wybot v Faure ja teised , kohtulahendite kogumik 1986, lk 2391. ;
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– võttes arvesse õiguskomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0331/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0331/2005 ),
SELGITAV SISSEJUHATUS
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
7. oktoobri 2005. aasta istungil teatas Euroopa Parlamendi president, et ta sai 1. juuli 2005. aasta kirjaga taotluse parlamendiliikme Giovanni Claudio Fava saadikupuutumatuse kaitsmise kohta, mis korrakohaselt edastati õiguskomisjonile.
At the sitting of 6 July 2005, the President of Parliament announced that he had received a request for the defence of the Parliamentary immunity of Giovanni Claudio Fava MEP by letter of 1 July 2005, which was duly forwarded to the Committee for Legal Affairs.
Taotlus on seotud Tribunale Civile di Palermo 's algatatud kohtumenetlusega hr Fava kui ajakirja Itaca mänedžeri vastu, kus teda süüdistatakse Sitsiilia maakonna valitud ametiisiku hr Cintola, kes on poliitilise partei Unione dei Democratici Cristiani e Democratici di Centro liige ja Sitsiilia maakonna Assessore al Bilancio e alle Finanze , laimamises.
The request relates to proceedings which have been brought in the Tribunale Civile di Palermo against Mr Fava, as manager of the review Itaca , where he is being sued for defamation by an elected office-holder of the Region of Sicily, Mr Cintola, a member of the political party, Unione dei Democratici Cristiani e Democratici di Centro, and Assessore al Bilancio e alle Finanze of the Region of Sicily.
Hr Cintola nõuab 1 000 000 eurot hüvitist.
Mr Cintola is claiming damages of EUR 1,000,000.
Oma Itaca artiklis "Allapoole vööd", mis on ühtaegu sõnamäng hr Cintola nimega, kirjutas hr Fava, et politsei oli filminud ja pealt kuulanud hr Cintolat, kui viimane sai tuntud maksunõunikult 25 000 eurot sisaldava ümbriku.
In an article which he wrote for Itaca , entitled "Below the belt" (which is also a pun on Mr Cintola's name), Mr Fava reported that the police had filmed and bugged Mr Cintola receiving from a well-known tax adviser an envelope containing EUR 25,000.
Artikli järgi oli maksunõunik mõned nädalad varem olnud uurimise all ühe rahapesujuhtumiga seoses.
According to the article, the tax adviser had been under investigation for a case of money laundering some weeks before.
Pealtnägijana selles kohtuasjas tunnistust andes ütles hr Cintola, et raha oli laenuks, kuid teine osapool kinnitas, et seda polnud kunagi tagasi makstud.
When giving testimony as a witness in that case, Mr Cintola said that the money was a loan, but the other party testified that it had never been repaid.
Te ei annaks, ega ju?
You wouldn't, would you?
Aga Sitsiilias on talle antud võtmed maakonna eelarvele, mõnele miljardile eurole või nii".
Well, in Sicily he has been given him the keys to the regional budget, a few billion euro or thereabouts".
Kohtumenetlus hr Fava (ning teiste ajalehe- ja ajakirjaomanike) vastu on algatatud tsiviilkohtus, kuid nõutav hüvitis (1 000 000 eurot) tundub vähemalt osaliselt põhinevat 1948. aasta ajakirjanduse kohta käiva seaduse nr 47 artiklil 12, mis võimaldab laimatud osapoolel nõuda hüvitist kriminaalkoodeksi alusel.
The case against Mr Fava (and other owners of newspapers and periodicals) has been brought in a civil court, but the damages sought (EUR 1,000,000) are based, it would seem, at least in part on Article 12 of Law No 47 of 1948 on the press, which allows the defamed party to apply for damages on the basis of the Criminal Code.
EESKIRJAD JA ÜLDISED KAALUTLUSED EUROOPA PARLAMENDI LIIKMETE IMMUNITEEDI KÜSIMUSES
LAW AND GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE IMMUNITY OF MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
8. aprilli 1965 aasta Euroopa ühenduste privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli artiklid 9 ja 10 kõlavad järgmiselt:
Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, read as follows:
Artikkel 9:
Article 9:
Assamblee liikmeid ei või üle kuulata, nende suhtes tõkendit kohaldada ega neid kohtumenetlusele allutada nende poolt oma kohustuste täitmisel avaldatud arvamuste või antud häälte tõttu.
Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties.
Artikkel 10:
Article 10:
Assamblee istungjärkude ajal on assamblee liikmetel:
During the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members shall enjoy:
a. oma riigi territooriumil samasugune immuniteet nagu selle riigi parlamendi liikmetel;
a . in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
b. teise liikmesriigi territooriumil immuniteet tõkendite ja kohtumenetluse suhtes.
b . in the territory of other Member States, immunity from any measure or detention and from legal proceedings.
Assamblee liikmete immuniteet kehtib ka siis, kui nad sõidavad assamblee istungipaika ja sealt tagasi.
Immunity shall likewise apply to Members while they are travelling to and from the place of meeting of the European Parliament.
Immuniteedile ei saa tugineda, kui assamblee liige tabatakse õiguserikkumiselt, ning see ei takista assambleel kasutamast õigust tühistada oma liikme immuniteet.
Immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members."
Menetlus Euroopa Parlamendis lähtub kodukorra artiklitest 6 ja 7.
The procedure in the European Parliament is governed by Articles 6 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure.
Asjakohased sätted kõlavad järgmiselt:
The relevant provisions read as follows:
Artikkel 6 Immuniteedi võtmine:
Rule 6 Waiver of immunity:
Artikkel 7 Immuniteediga seonduvad menetlused:
Rule 7 Procedure on immunity:
OTSUSE ETTEPANEKU PÕHJENDUS
JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED DECISION
Privileegide ja immuniteetide protokolli artikkel 9 sätestab Euroopa Parlamendi liikmete absoluutse kaitse kohtumenetluse algatamise eest " nende poolt oma kohustuste täitmisel avaldatud arvamuste ... tõttu".
Article 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities provides that Members of the European Parliament have absolute immunity from legal proceedings "in respect of opinions expressed .. in the performance of their duties".
Palermo Tribunale Civile 's algatatud kohtuasjas nõuab hageja mitmetelt kostjatelt, sealhulgas hr Favalt, 1 000 000 eurot kahjutasu karistusena avaliku ametiisiku väidetava laimamise eest tema maakonnas.
In his summons lodged with the Tribunale Civile of Palermo, the complainant seeks punitive damages of EUR 1,000,000 against a series of defendants, including Mr Fava, for allegedly libelling a public office-holder in his region.
Hageja väidab, et laim on eriti tõsine arvestades, et ta on maakonna nõunik ning et tema reputatsioonile tekitatud kahju võib kodanikes tekitada tõsist ärevust tema poolt juhitava ameti avaliku rolli suhtes.
The complainant argues that the libel is particularly serious on account of the fact that he is a regional councillor and that the resultant serious damage to his image could cause genuine social alarm to be felt by citizens with regard to the public role of the department for which he is responsible.
On siiski selge, et Itaca 's avaldatud artiklis esitas hr Fava vaid faktid, mis olid juba avaldatud ühe teise kohtumenetlustega seoses ja seega avalikkuse ees ning kommenteeris neid, tehes järeldusi poliitiku sobivuse kohta avalikule ametikohale oma maakonnas.
It is clear, however, that in his article published in Itaca , Mr Fava merely reproduced facts which had been published in connection with separate court proceedings and hence in the public domain and then commented on them, drawing inferences with a regard to a politician's suitability to hold public office in his region.
Seda tehes täitis ta oma parlamendiliikme kohust, väljendades avaliku huvi küsimuses oma arvamust oma valijatele.
In so doing he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
Lisaks sellele toob tõsiasi, et artikli teema oli poliitiku ja ametiisiku käitumine, artikli õigustatult poliitilise arutelu valdkonda.
Moreover, the fact that the subject of his article was the behaviour of a politician and the holder of a public office brings this article within the realm of legitimate political debate.
Lühidalt öeldes, hr Fava tegi lihtsalt oma tööd kui parlamendiliige.
In short, Mr Fava was simply doing his job as a Member of Parliament.
Püüda kohtumenetlust algatades parlamendiliikmeid takistada väljendamast oma arvamust õigustatud avaliku huvi küsimustes on demokraatlikule ühiskonnale vastuvõtmatu ning selgelt vastuolus protokolli 9 artikliga, mille eesmärgiks on kaitsta parlamendiliikmete sõnavabadust oma kohustuste täitmisel parlamendi kui institutsiooni huvides.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an institution.
Ülalnimetatud kaalutluste alusel ja olles läbi vaadanud puutumatuse kaitsmise poolt- ja vastuargumendid soovitab õiguskomisjon kaitsta Giovanni Claudio Fava puutumatust.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Giovanni Claudio Fava be defended.
Giovanni Claudio Fava puutumatuse ja privileegide kaitse taotlus
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Giovanni Claudio Fava
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus välisfiliaalide struktuuri ja tegevust käsitleva ühenduse statistika kohta
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on the structure and activity of foreign affiliates
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule ( KOM(2005)0088 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0088 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 251 lõiget 2 ja artikli 285 lõiget 1, mille alusel komisjon Euroopa Parlamendile ettepaneku esitas ( C6‑0084/2005 );
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0084/2005 ),
– võttes arvesse majandus- ja rahanduskomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0332/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0332/2005 ),
(11) Käesoleva määruse rakendamiseks vajalikud meetmed tuleb vastu võtta vastavalt nõukogu 28. juuni 1999. aasta otsusele 1999/468/EÜ, millega kehtestatakse komisjoni rakendusvolituste kasutamise menetlused.
(11) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission.
Euroopa Parlament taotles oma 5. veebruari 2002. aasta resolutsioonis finantsteenuseid käsitlevate õigusaktide rakendamise kohta
In its resolution of 5 February 2002 on the implementation of financial services legislation
EÜT C 284 E, 21.11.2002, lk 115.
OJ C 284 E, 21.11.2002, p.
Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule asutamislepingu artikli 251 kohaste Euroopa Parlamendi õigusloomega seotud õiguste alusel võrdset rolli komisjoni täitevvõimu teostamise järelevalves.
115. , the European Parliament requested that the European Parliament and the Council have an equal role in supervising the way in which the Commission exercises its executive role in order to reflect the legislative powers of the European Parliament under Article 251 of the Treaty.
Komisjon toetas seda taotlust pidulikus deklaratsioonis, mille komisjoni president esitas parlamendile samal päeval.
In the solemn declaration made before the European Parliament the same day by its President the Commission supported that request.
Komisjon tegi 11. detsembril 2002 ettepaneku otsust 1999/468/EÜ ( KOM(2002)0719 ) muuta ja esitas muudetud ettepaneku 22. aprillil 2004 ( KOM(2004)0324 ).
On 11 December 2002, the Commission proposed amendments to Decision 1999/468/EC ( COM( 2002)0719) and then submitted an amended proposal on 22 April 2004 ( COM(2004)0324 ).
Euroopa Parlament leiab, et nimetatud ettepanekus ei ole tema õigusloomega seotud õigused säilinud.
The European Parliament does not consider that that proposal preserves its legislative prerogatives.
Euroopa Parlament on seisukohal, et Euroopa Parlamendil ja nõukogul peaks olema võimalus hinnata komisjonile rakendusvolituste andmist kindlaksmääratud ajavahemiku jooksul.
In the view of the European Parliament, the European Parliament and the Council should have the opportunity of evaluating the conferral of implementing powers on the Commission within a determined period.
Seetõttu on asjakohane piirata ajavahemikku, mille jooksul komisjon võib rakendusmeetmed vastu võtta.
It is therefore appropriate to limit the period during which the Commission may adopt implementing measures.
(11 a) Euroopa Parlamendile tuleks anda kavandatud muudatuste ja rakendusmeetmete kontrollimist ning neid käsitleva arvamuse esitamiseks kolm kuud aega alates kavandatud meetmete esimesest esitamisest.
(11a) The European Parliament should be given a period of three months from the first transmission of draft amendments and implementing measures to allow it to examine them and to give its opinion.
Kiireloomulistel ja nõuetekohaselt põhjendatud juhtudel peaks olema võimalik seda ajavahemikku lühendada.
However, in urgent and duly justified cases, it should be possible to shorten that period.
Kui selle ajavahemiku jooksul võtab Euroopa Parlament vastu resolutsiooni, peaks komisjon kavandatud muudatused või meetmed uuesti läbi vaatama.
If, within that period, a resolution is passed by the European Parliament, the Commission should re-examine the draft amendments or measures.
Liikmesriigid võivad artiklis 6 osutatud kvaliteeditingimusi järgides koguda käesolevas määruses ettenähtud teavet ükskõik millistest allikatest, mida nad peavad olulisteks.
Member States may , whilst complying with conditions as to quality referred to in Article 6, collect the information required under this Regulation using any sources they consider relevant.
Liikmesriigid koguvad artiklis 6 osutatud kvaliteeditingimusi järgides käesolevas määruses ettenähtud teavet ükskõik millistest allikatest, mida nad peavad olulisteks.
Member States shall , whilst complying with conditions as to quality referred to in Article 6, collect the information required under this Regulation using any sources they consider relevant.
Komisjon koostab programmi prooviuuringute jaoks, mille viivad läbi riigiasutused nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 322/97 artikli 2 tähenduses vabatahtlikkuse alusel, et uurida andmete kogumise teostatavust ja maksumust lisamuutujate ja jaotuste kohta asjaomases riigis asuvate välisriigi äriühingute filiaalide statistika puhul ja andmete kogumist asjaomase riigi äriühingute välisriigis asuvate filiaalide statistika kohta
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by national authorities in the meaning of Article 2 of Council Regulation ( CE ) No 322/97 on a voluntary basis to investigate the feasibility and costs of collecting data on additional variables and breakdowns for inward statistics on foreign affiliates, and of collecting data on outward statistics of foreign affiliates.
Komisjon koostab programmi prooviuuringute jaoks, mille viivad läbi riigiasutused nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 322/97 artikli 2 tähenduses lisamuutujate ja jaotuste kohta asjaomases riigis asuvate välisriigi äriühingute filiaalide statistika puhul ja andmete kogumist asjaomase riigi äriühingute välisriigis asuvate filiaalide statistika kohta
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by national authorities in the meaning of Article 2 of Council Regulation ( EC ) No 322/97 on additional variables and breakdowns for inward statistics on foreign affiliates, and of collecting data on outward statistics of foreign affiliates.
Prooviuuringud viiakse läbi selleks, et hinnata andmete kogumise asjakohasust ja võimalikkust, võttes arvesse andmete kättesaadavuse eeliseid võrreldes statistikasüsteemi kulutuste ja ettevõtete koormusega.
The pilot studies shall be carried out in order to assess the relevance and feasibility of collecting data, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the cost of the statistical system and the burden on enterprises.
Prooviuuringute järelduste alusel võtab komisjon vajalikud rakendusmeetmed artikli 10 lõikes 2 osutatud korras.
On the basis of the conclusions of the pilot studies, the Commission shall adopt the necessary implementation measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 10(2).
Prooviuuringute tulemuste alusel võtab komisjon vajalikud rakendusmeetmed asjaomases riigis asuvate välisriigi äriühingute filiaalide statistika ja asjaomase riigi äriühingute välisriigis asuvate filiaalide statistika kohta artikli 10 lõikes 2 osutatud korras.
On the basis of the results of the pilot studies, the Commission shall adopt the necessary implementation measures for inward and outward statistics on foreign affiliates in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 10(2).
Komisjon hindab edastatud andmete kvaliteeti liikmesriikide saadetud kvaliteediaruannete alusel ning määrab kindlaks nimetatud tegevuse ajavahemiku.
The Commission shall assess the quality of the data transmitted on the basis of the quality reports transmitted by the Member States, and shall define the periodicity of such exercise.
Komisjon hindab edastatud andmete kvaliteeti ning määrab kindlaks nimetatud tegevuse ajavahemiku.
The Commission shall assess the quality of the data transmitted and shall define the periodicity of such exercise.
Üleminekuperioodi vältel, mis ei ületa nelja aastat alates esimesest vaatlusaastast, võib komisjon lubada liikmesriikidele erandeid, kui nende siseriiklikud statistikasüsteemid vajavad suuremaid kohandusi.
During a transitional period that shall not exceed four years from the first reference year, derogations may be granted by the Commission to Member States when their national statistical systems require major adaptations.
Üleminekuperioodi vältel, mis ei ületa nelja aastat alates esimesest vaatlusaastast, võib komisjon piiratud ajaks lubada liikmesriikidele erandeid käesoleva määruse sätetest artikli 10 lõikes 2 osutatud korras , kui nende siseriiklikud statistikasüsteemid vajavad suuremaid kohandusi.
During a transitional period that shall not exceed four years from the first reference year, derogations from the provisions of this Regulation may be granted for a limited period by the Commission to Member States , in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 10(2), when their national statistical systems require major adaptations.