natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This proposal for a Council regulation requires special attention, as it represents a kind of codification of existing regulations for the conservation of fishery resources in the Baltic Sea through the application of appropriate technical measures.
This proposal for a Council regulation requires special attention, as it represents a kind of codification of existing regulations for the conservation of fishery resources in the Baltic Sea through the application of appropriate technical measures.
It brings together the rules drawn up before 2004, i.e. before the accession of the 10 new Member States to the EU.
It brings together the rules drawn up before 2004, i.e. before the accession of the 10 new Member States to the EU.
It was, therefore, primarily the 'old 15' that took part in the extensive negotiations held on the regulation in 2004.
It was, therefore, primarily the 'old 15' that took part in the extensive negotiations held on the regulation in 2004.
The possibility for the other European countries concerned to be involved was limited, as Parliament's new elected representatives were of course unable to participate in the talks.
The possibility for the other European countries concerned to be involved was limited, as Parliament's new elected representatives were of course unable to participate in the talks.
Although originally drafted in the above manner, the document is now before the new-look European Parliament, which now includes the EU-10.
Although originally drafted in the above manner, the document is now before the new-look European Parliament, which now includes the EU-10.
In practice, this means that the four existing EU Baltic partners have been joined by four more (which are at the same time direct neighbours of Russia, which remains outside of the integrated structures).
In practice, this means that the four existing EU Baltic partners have been joined by four more (which are at the same time direct neighbours of Russia, which remains outside of the integrated structures).
In view of the Baltic's specific environmental characteristics and the significant differences between its western and eastern parts, it was imperative that the new Member States had a strong say on this regulation.
In view of the Baltic's specific environmental characteristics and the significant differences between its western and eastern parts, it was imperative that the new Member States had a strong say on this regulation.
The rapporteur on this subject, a Member representing a region in the southern Baltic, faced an inordinately difficult task in examining numerous proposals for amendments and some more or less specific suggestions.
The rapporteur on this subject, a Member representing a region in the southern Baltic, faced an inordinately difficult task in examining numerous proposals for amendments and some more or less specific suggestions.
What is worse, he had to deal with the need to combine these opinions with the position adopted in the 1990s by members of the Committee on Fisheries.
What is worse, he had to deal with the need to combine these opinions with the position adopted in the 1990s by members of the Committee on Fisheries.
Many of those members are still part of the committee.
Many of those members are still part of the committee.
The authors of the regulation generally concentrate on simplifying existing regulations by reducing the number of categories of fishing equipment, standardising the dates for closed seasons and establishing minimum landing sizes.
The authors of the regulation generally concentrate on simplifying existing regulations by reducing the number of categories of fishing equipment, standardising the dates for closed seasons and establishing minimum landing sizes.
There is good reason to believe that their consultations with the new Member States were restricted in the main to those involved in fisheries administration.
There is good reason to believe that their consultations with the new Member States were restricted in the main to those involved in fisheries administration.
The rapporteur, however, believes that consultations with representatives of the fishing and processing sectors are also necessary.
The rapporteur, however, believes that consultations with representatives of the fishing and processing sectors are also necessary.
Experts in these sectors have repeatedly painted a black picture of the situation for fishermen in the southern Baltic, and part of the proposal for a regulation has been firmly rejected.
Experts in these sectors have repeatedly painted a black picture of the situation for fishermen in the southern Baltic, and part of the proposal for a regulation has been firmly rejected.
The suggestions from Parliament's Committee on Fisheries, on the other hand, appear to tend towards the adjustment to Baltic conditions of equipment used in other seas.
The suggestions from Parliament's Committee on Fisheries, on the other hand, appear to tend towards the adjustment to Baltic conditions of equipment used in other seas.
Although the premise is generally sound, in some cases serious doubts arise, as some of the proposed solutions would hit fisherman too hard (and not entirely justifiably).
Although the premise is generally sound, in some cases serious doubts arise, as some of the proposed solutions would hit fisherman too hard (and not entirely justifiably).
The suggestions gave rise to differences in interpretation and disputes, becoming a source of conflict between old and new Member States.
The suggestions gave rise to differences in interpretation and disputes, becoming a source of conflict between old and new Member States.
Both sides' persistence in their stances was unfortunately reflected in the rapporteur's amendments to the regulation presented at the Committee on Fisheries' meeting of 11 July 2005, when some articles or parts thereof were explicitly questioned.
Both sides' persistence in their stances was unfortunately reflected in the rapporteur's amendments to the regulation presented at the Committee on Fisheries' meeting of 11 July 2005, when some articles or parts thereof were explicitly questioned.
The dispute, though skirted around in the course of the official discussion, was very real, or at least that is how it appeared to your rapporteur.
The dispute, though skirted around in the course of the official discussion, was very real, or at least that is how it appeared to your rapporteur.
Following the meeting, it was then time for other Members to table amendments and for further rapporteur's amendments, and to seek a final and satisfactory resolution of the matter.
Following the meeting, it was then time for other Members to table amendments and for further rapporteur's amendments, and to seek a final and satisfactory resolution of the matter.
Fortunately, the fresh negotiations opened up clear possibilities for resolving the fundamental disagreements.
Fortunately, the fresh negotiations opened up clear possibilities for resolving the fundamental disagreements.
They allowed the rapporteur and his advisers – with due regard for the main intentions of the authors of the regulation and the interests of the directly affected Baltic fishing community – to interpret some of the articles in a more flexible manner, encouraging committee members to look at them in a new light.
They allowed the rapporteur and his advisers – with due regard for the main intentions of the authors of the regulation and the interests of the directly affected Baltic fishing community – to interpret some of the articles in a more flexible manner, encouraging committee members to look at them in a new light.
The negotiations also made it possible to make a new attempt to meet the expectations of many Members.
The negotiations also made it possible to make a new attempt to meet the expectations of many Members.
The undoubted weakness in the regulation was the failure to define an extension piece, which is referred to in several articles.
The undoubted weakness in the regulation was the failure to define an extension piece, which is referred to in several articles.
This omission was pointed out during one of the meetings of the Committee on Fisheries.
This omission was pointed out during one of the meetings of the Committee on Fisheries.
The authors' decision to correct this error is to be welcomed.
The authors' decision to correct this error is to be welcomed.
The rapporteur drafted a definition of the extension piece, treating it primarily as a part of the trawl increasing the capacity of the codend.
The rapporteur drafted a definition of the extension piece, treating it primarily as a part of the trawl increasing the capacity of the codend.
This approach automatically improved the situation for many of the provisions concerning the extension piece, freeing them all controversy as to their meaning.
This approach automatically improved the situation for many of the provisions concerning the extension piece, freeing them all controversy as to their meaning.
This meant that Amendment 16 could be withdrawn completely and that the restrictive Amendments 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 could be toned down, reducing them to appropriate fine-tuning of the proposal for a regulation.
This meant that Amendment 16 could be withdrawn completely and that the restrictive Amendments 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 could be toned down, reducing them to appropriate fine-tuning of the proposal for a regulation.
At the same time, the 'restrictive' Article 6, a source of worry for the entire fishing sector, takes on a different meaning and becomes less of an 'irritation'.
At the same time, the 'restrictive' Article 6, a source of worry for the entire fishing sector, takes on a different meaning and becomes less of an 'irritation'.
The rapporteur also saw that it was possible to withdraw his Amendments 12, 13, 14 and 17.
The rapporteur also saw that it was possible to withdraw his Amendments 12, 13, 14 and 17.
The awareness that the renewal of intensive efforts by the Commission and Council to improve the regulation was already producing results (thanks in part to their consideration of the Committee on Fisheries' criticisms) allowed the rapporteur to concern himself once again with the issues that had so far provoked the most discussion.
The awareness that the renewal of intensive efforts by the Commission and Council to improve the regulation was already producing results (thanks in part to their consideration of the Committee on Fisheries' criticisms) allowed the rapporteur to concern himself once again with the issues that had so far provoked the most discussion.
Within the Committee on Fisheries, the amendment by the rapporteur to Article 12 proved particularly controversial.
Within the Committee on Fisheries, the amendment by the rapporteur to Article 12 proved particularly controversial.
It should be acknowledged that the salmon driftnets used in the southern Baltic pose a minimal threat to porpoise, which are now extremely rare in the area.
It should be acknowledged that the salmon driftnets used in the southern Baltic pose a minimal threat to porpoise, which are now extremely rare in the area.
It is also true that the abolition of this sort of equipment, as proposed in the regulation in line previous resolutions of the Committee on Fisheries, would prevent around 60 Polish shipowners from fishing for salmon.
It is also true that the abolition of this sort of equipment, as proposed in the regulation in line previous resolutions of the Committee on Fisheries, would prevent around 60 Polish shipowners from fishing for salmon.
However, the worrying reports over the last few days of the declining porpoise population calls for particular prudence and a thorough examination of this problem.
However, the worrying reports over the last few days of the declining porpoise population calls for particular prudence and a thorough examination of this problem.
In his amendments, the rapporteur endeavoured, therefore, to take into account the intentions of the regulation's authors.
In his amendments, the rapporteur endeavoured, therefore, to take into account the intentions of the regulation's authors.
Nevertheless, the issue of the Baltic fishermen's justifiable fears about their future requires remedial action, and in particular serious attempts to establish the real state of affairs.
Nevertheless, the issue of the Baltic fishermen's justifiable fears about their future requires remedial action, and in particular serious attempts to establish the real state of affairs.
An evaluation of the effects on sea mammals of using driftnets and other entangling equipment should be carried out up to 1 January 2008.
An evaluation of the effects on sea mammals of using driftnets and other entangling equipment should be carried out up to 1 January 2008.
The results of this thorough evaluation would then determine the final decision as to the continued use or withdrawal of driftnets.
The results of this thorough evaluation would then determine the final decision as to the continued use or withdrawal of driftnets.
The possibility of a compromise solution to the issue of cod-fishing gear is also emerging.
The possibility of a compromise solution to the issue of cod-fishing gear is also emerging.
The Commission and Council seem increasingly to favour the possibility of using the tried and tested T90 codend, in addition to the BACOMA-type exit window (for young fish) recommended in the regulation.
The Commission and Council seem increasingly to favour the possibility of using the tried and tested T90 codend, in addition to the BACOMA-type exit window (for young fish) recommended in the regulation.
The rapporteur included the technical specifications of this equipment in the relevant amendment, confident that the proposal will find support in the Committee on Fisheries.
The rapporteur included the technical specifications of this equipment in the relevant amendment, confident that the proposal will find support in the Committee on Fisheries.
In summary, it should be stressed that the proposal for a Council regulation dated 14 March 2005 is in the process of being extensively altered.
In summary, it should be stressed that the proposal for a Council regulation dated 14 March 2005 is in the process of being extensively altered.
After the Commission had completed the groundwork, the Council began the task of making changes and is holding extensive negotiations with the countries concerned.
After the Commission had completed the groundwork, the Council began the task of making changes and is holding extensive negotiations with the countries concerned.
The opinion of the Committee on Fisheries will be of key importance for the work ahead.
The opinion of the Committee on Fisheries will be of key importance for the work ahead.
The continued participation of MEPs in the consultations would also be advisable.
The continued participation of MEPs in the consultations would also be advisable.
In conclusion, I should like to stress that the importance of the proposal, its special nature and its significance to the development of Baltic fishing (particularly in maintaining fish stocks) all require thorough recognition of the problem and sound judgment when the final decisions are made.
In conclusion, I should like to stress that the importance of the proposal, its special nature and its significance to the development of Baltic fishing (particularly in maintaining fish stocks) all require thorough recognition of the problem and sound judgment when the final decisions are made.
These decisions will be useful only if they properly reflect the spirit and the letter of the Baltic situation.
These decisions will be useful only if they properly reflect the spirit and the letter of the Baltic situation.
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega käsitletakse Läänemere, Suur- ja Väike-Belti ning Sundi kalavarude kaitsmist tehniliste meetmete abil ning muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1434/98
Proposal for a Council regulation on the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures in the Baltic Sea, the Belts and the Sound and amending Regulation (EC) No 1434/98
art 37 EÜ
Article 37 EC
TEINE RAPORT
SECOND REPORT
ettepaneku kohta võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määruseid (EMÜ) nr 2759/75, (EMÜ) nr 2771/75, (EMÜ) nr 2777/75, (EÜ) nr 1254/1999, (EÜ) nr 1255/1999 ja (EÜ) nr 2529/2001 erandlike turutoetusmeetmete suhtes
on the proposal for a Council regulation on amending Regulations (EEC) No 2759/75, (EEC) No 2771/75, (EEC) No 2777/75, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1255/1999 and (EC) No 2529/2001 as regards exceptional market support measures
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut nõukogule (KOM(2004)712)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0712 )
ELTs seni veel avaldamata. ;
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artikleid 51, 52 (3 ja 4) ja 168;
– having regard to Rules 51, 52 (3 and 4) and 168 (1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjoni raportit ( A6‑0126/2005 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0126/2005 ),
– võttes arvesse põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjoni teist raportit ( A6‑0266/2005 ),
– having regard to the second report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0266/2005 ),
3 a) Liikmesriigid peavad tagama, et tootjate osaluse puhul liikmesriigi kantavate kulude katmisel ei kaasneks konkurentsi moonutamist erinevate liikmesriikide tootjate vahel.
(3a) Member States should ensure that distortion of competition does not arise in the event that Member States involve producers in providing part of the funding which they have taken on.
Artikli 20 lõige 2 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 2759/75)
Article 20, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75)
Ühendus osaleb lõikes 1 osutatud meetmete rahastamises 50% ulatuses liikmesriikide kantud kuludest.
The Community shall provide part-financing for the measures referred to in paragraph 1 equivalent to 50% of the expenditure borne by Member States.
Ühendus osaleb lõikes 1 osutatud meetmete rahastamises 75% ulatuses liikmesriikide kantud kuludest.
The Community shall provide part-financing for the measures referred to in paragraph 1 equivalent to 75% of the expenditure borne by Member States.
Artikli 20 lõike 2 esimene lõik a (uus) (määrus (EÜ) nr 2759/75)
Article 20, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75)
Liikmesriigid peavad tagama, et tootjate osaluse puhul liikmesriigi kantavate kulude katmisel ei kaasneks konkurentsi moonutamist erinevate liikmesriikide tootjate vahel.
Member States must ensure that, where producers contribute to the expenditure borne by Member States, this does not result in distortion of competition between producers in different Member States.
Komisjon jälgib, kas ei leia aset taolisi konkurentsi moonutamisi ning võtab asjakohaseid meetmeid.
The Commission shall monitor whether any such distortion of competition is taking place and shall take action as appropriate.
Komisjon esitab kord kuue kuu jooksul Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule aruande konkurentsi moonutamist puudutava olukorra kohta.
The Commission shall report every six months to the European Parliament and the Council on the situation regarding distortion of competition.
Artikli 14 lõige 2 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 2771/75)
Article 14, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75)
Artikli 14 lõike 2 esimene lõik a (uus) (määrus (EÜ) nr 2771/75)
Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75)
Artikli 14 lõige 2 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 2777/75)
Article 14, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75)
Artikli 14 lõike 2 esimene lõik a (uus) (määrus (EÜ) nr 2777/75)
Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75)
Artikli 39 lõige 2 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 1254/1999)
Article 39, paragraph 2, (Regulation (EEC) No 1254/1999)
Ühendus osaleb lõikes 1 osutatud meetmete rahastamises 60% ulatuses liikmesriikide kantud kuludest.
The Community shall provide part-financing for the measures referred to in paragraph 1 equivalent to 60% of the expenditure borne by Member States.
Artikli 39 lõike 2 esimene lõik a (uus) (määrus (EÜ) nr 1254/1999)
Article 39, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 1254/1999)
Artikli 36 lõige 2 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 1255/1999)
Article 36, paragraph 2, (Regulation (EEC) No 1255/1999)
Artikli 36 lõike 2 esimene lõik a (uus) (määrus (EÜ) nr 1255/1999)
Article 36, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 1255/1999)
Artikli 22 lõige 2 (määrus (EMÜ) nr 2529/2001)
Article 22, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 2529/2001)
Artikli 22 lõike 2 esimene lõik a (uus) (määrus (EÜ) nr 2529/2001)
Article 22, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 2529/2001)
OJ C 85, 23.5.2000, p.
OJ C 85, 23.5.2000, p.
1-28. of the Court of Auditors on classical swine fever, in which the Court recommended a strict parallelism between the co-financing of veterinary measures and market support measures.
1-28. of the Court of Auditors on classical swine fever, in which the Court recommended a strict parallelism between the co-financing of veterinary measures and market support measures.
This is by the way a valid point that has also been raised in the report of Mr. Busk.
This is by the way a valid point that has also been raised in the report of Mr. Busk.
art 36 ja 37 (EÜ)
Article 36 and 37 EC
TAGASISAATMINE PARLAMENDIKOMISJONILE
REFERRAL BACK TO COMMITTEE
Komisjonile tagasisaatmise kuupäev Menetlusalus
Date referred back to committee Basis in Rules of Procedure
art 52 lg 3 art 168 lg 1
Rule 52(3) Rule 168(1)
Raporti esitamise tähtaeg
Deadline for reporting back
Raportöör(id) kinnitamise/nimetamise kuupäev
Rapporteur (s) Date confirmed/appointed
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsus, millega luuakse ühtne tegevusprogramm elukestva õppe alal
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................28
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................28
VÄLISKOMISJONI ARVAMUS .............................................................................................34
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................34
eelarvekomisjoni arvamus .......................................................................................42
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................42
Tööhõive- ja sotsiaalkomisjoni arvamus .........................................................51
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............51
Tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjoni arvamus ............73
OPINION of the Committee on INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............77
Kodanikuvabaduste, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjoni arvamus ...........83
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 87
Naiste õiguste ja soolise võrdõiguslikkuse komisjioni arvamus .......91
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...94
ettepaneku kohta võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsus, millega luuakse ühtne tegevusprogramm elukestva õppe alal
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0474 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0474 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 251 lõiget 2 ja artikli 149 lõiget 4 ning artikli 150 lõiget 4, mille alusel komisjon Euroopa Parlamendile ettepaneku esitas ( C6‑0095/2004 );
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 149(4) and 150(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0095/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse regioonide komitee arvamust
- having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions