natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist nõukogule ja Euroopa Parlamendile terrorismivastaseks võitluseks võetavate meetmete ja tõsise kuriteo muude vormide kohta, eriti teabevahetuse parandamiseks (KOM(2004)221);
- having regard to the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on measures to be taken to combat terrorism and other forms of serious crime, in particular to improve exchanges of information (COM(2004) 221),
– võttes arvesse nõukogu raamotsuse eelnõud Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikide õiguskaitseasutuste vahelise teabe ja jälitusteabe vahetamise lihtsustamise kohta, eelkõige raskete õigusrikkumiste, sealhulgas terroriaktide korral (10215/04);
- having regard to the draft Council framework decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union, in particular as regards serious offences including terrorist acts (10215/04),
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artikli 114 lõiget 3 ja artiklit 94;
- having regard to Rules 114(3) and 94 of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse kodanikuvabaduste, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjoni raportit ( A6‑0166/2005 );
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0166/2005 ),
A. arvestades, et Euroopa Liidu põhiprioriteet seoses terrorirünnakuteks ettevalmistamise ja neile reageerimisega on ühenduse institutsioonide ja liikmesriikide suutlikkus tõkestada terrorirünnakuid;
A. whereas the European Union’s main priority as regards preparing for and responding to terrorist attacks is the Community institutions’ and the Member States’ ability to prevent terrorist attacks,
B. arvestades, et poliitilisest vaatenurgast on ELi institutsioonide jaoks peamine terrorismiga seotud oht see, et eurooplased tunnevad end terrorirünnakute ees kaitsetuna, eriti rünnaku toimumise hetkel;
B. whereas from the political viewpoint the main risk facing the EU institutions with regard to terrorism is that the people of Europe will feel defenceless in the face of terrorist acts, especially at the moment when an attack happens,
C. arvestades, et terrorismi tõkestamiseks ei piisa enamasti tegevusettepanekute pika, üldise nimekirja koostamisest;
C whereas in order to tackle terrorism it is not sufficient to draw up a lengthy, generic list of proposals for action,
D. arvestades, et terrorismivastane võitlus rünnakute või muul kujul nõuab igal ajal inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste kaitset kui meie institutsioonide identiteedi olulist elementi ja sümbolit ning arvestades, et tuleb tagada, et erakorralise olukorra õigusaktid ei kahjustaks inimõigusi, põhivabadusi ega andmekaitset;
D. whereas the fight against terrorism, whether as a response to terrorist attacks or not, at all times must imply the protection of human rights and respect for fundamental freedoms, as an essential element and symbol of identity of our institutions, and whereas any emergency legislation must be in accordance with the respect of human rights, fundamental freedoms and data protection requirements,
E. arvestades, et terrorismivastane võitlus nõuab erilisi strateegiaid iga terroristliku organisatsiooni jaoks, mistõttu tuleks juhul, kui selle võitluse jätkamiseks on nähtud ette uusi vahendeid, võtta arvesse nimetatud organisatsioonide sotsiaalset struktuuri ja strateegiat;
E whereas the fight against terrorism calls for specific strategies in respect of each terrorist organisation, for which reason the social structure and the strategy of such organisations should be taken into account when new means of pursuing that fight are being devised,
F. arvestades, et terroristlike organisatsioonide hajutatud laad on alati neile kasuks, kuna mitte keegi täpselt ei tea nende tegevuse ja toetuse ulatust, on vaja mõista selliseid organisatsioone ning neid kaitsvat ja toetavat sotsiaalkeskkonda, et nendevastane võitlus oleks tulemuslik;
F. whereas the diffuse and unpredictable nature of terrorist organisations always works in their favour, since no-one knows with certainty the precise scope of their activity or the extent of support they enjoy, it is essential, in order to combat them effectively, to understand these organisations and the social context which nurtures and sustains them,
G. arvestades, et neid organisatsioone ei piira riigipiirid ega teatavad geograafilised piirkonnad, kuritarvitavad nad tihti läbipaistvuse puudumist “läbikukkunud ja läbikukkuvates riikides” ning neil võib samal ajal olla laastav mõju eri riikides;
G. whereas these organisations are not limited by borders or to specific geographical areas, often abuse the lack of transparency in ‘failed and failing states’, and are capable of having devastating effects in different countries at the same time,
H. arvestades, et liidu ohtude hindamise kontekstis on tekkivaks nähtuseks terrorism kõigis oma ilmingutes, mille toimimisstruktuuri ning rünnakute ajastamist ja rütmi mõistetakse ikka veel puudulikult;
H. whereas, in the context of evaluating the threats to the Union, terrorism in all its manifestations is an emerging phenomenon which remains imperfectly understood in terms of operational structure and the timing and rhythm of attacks,
I. arvestades, et puudub vastuolu islamile lugupidamise avaldamise ja selle selgeks tegemise vahel, et radikaalsete islamirühmituste terrorism on stabiilsusele kõige tõsisem oht, millega liidu institutsioonid peavad järgmistel aastatel silmitsi seisma, ning rõhutades vajadust tagada, et islamiusulisi usulistel kaalutlustel ei diskrimineerita ja kordab, et mingil juhul ei tohi islami võrdsustada terrorismiga;
I. whereas there is no contradiction between showing respect for Islam and making it clear that terrorism by fundamentalist Islamist groups is the gravest threat to stability that EU institutions will have to face in the coming years, stresses the need to ensure that Muslims do not suffer discrimination because of their faith, and reiterates that under no circumstances should Islam be equated with terrorism,
J. arvestades, et paljususe, mitmekesisuse, inimõiguste ja rahumeelse dialoogi jõuline toetamine on tihti terroristliku nähtuse osaks või tagajärjeks oleva äärmusluse ning kahjuliku sotsiaalse polariseerumise parim ennetus- ja heastamisvahend;
J. whereas vigorously standing for pluralism, diversity, human rights and peaceful dialogue is the best means of preventing and remedying the radicalisation and harmful social polarisation that are often part and consequence of the terrorist phenomenon,
K. arvestades, et tõkestamine peab põhinema teabel, kestval terroriohtu käsitleval avalikul arutelul, poliitilise strateegiana kasutatava terrorismi ühisel tõrjumisel ning terrorismi tõrjumisest keeldumise õigustamiseks kasutatavate põhjuste analüüsimisel, pidades meeles, et alati tuleks vältida tarbetuid hoiatusi ja tegeliku ohu moonutamist;
K. whereas prevention should be based on information, on an ongoing public debate on the terrorist threat, on a collective rejection of terrorism as a political strategy, on an analysis of the reasons used by some to justify a refusal to reject terrorism, bearing in mind that there is always a need to try to avoid causing undue alarm and misrepresenting the true nature of the threat,
L. arvestades, et Euroopa Parlament on Euroopa peamine foorum dialoogi pidamiseks ühiskonnaga ja ELi eri institutsioonide vahel ning peaks seetõttu suutma jagada teavet terroristlike organisatsioonide ja nende töömeetodite ning liidu jõupingutuste kohta võitlemisel nimetatud organisatsioonide vastu;
L. whereas the EP is the main European forum for dialogue with society and between the various EU institutions, and should therefore be in a position to share information regarding terrorist organisations and their modus operandi, and the Union’s efforts to fight them,
M. arvestades, et tõkestamisel on hädavajalik ohu tõsidust ette aimata nii, et avalik arvamus taipaks, et rünnakute toimumise tõkestamiseks on tehtud kõikvõimalikke inimlikke ja poliitilisi pingutusi, ning arvestades, et põhjalik ja pidev tõkestuspoliitika peab – kui rünnakut ei suudeta tõkestada – tagama, et ei tekiks usalduskriisi Euroopa institutsioonide suhtes, mis tuleneb nende ebaõnnestumise tajumisest;
M. whereas prevention necessitates anticipating the seriousness of the risk, so that public opinion realises that all possible human and political efforts have been made to prevent attacks from happening, and whereas a thorough-going and sustained prevention policy must, in cases where an attack cannot be prevented, ensure that there is no crisis of confidence in the political project of the European institutions arising from a perception that they have failed,
N. arvestades, et selle konkreetse terrorismivormiga tegelemiseks peab EL koostama ja rakendama Euroopa kodanike poolt kergesti identifitseeritava Euroopa sise- ja välisjulgeoleku edendamist käsitleva poliitilise projekti, mitte ainult üldiste meetmete loetelu;
N. whereas, in order to deal with this specific form of terrorism, the EU needs to define and put into practice a European political project that can be easily identified by European citizens and promotes internal and external security, not only a list of general measures,
O. arvestades, et poliitiline reageering saab olemas olla üksnes tõkestamise korral, kuna vastasel juhul võib reaktsioon Euroopa tasandil olla üksnes ebapiisav ja korratu;
O. whereas a political response can only exist if there is prevention, since otherwise the reaction at European level can only be inadequate and disorganised,
P. arvestades, et ELi sise- ja välisjulgeolekupoliitika peaks olema järjepidev ja sel eesmärgil peaks seda poliitikat kajastama ELi institutsioonide toimimine;
P. whereas the EU’s internal and external security policies should be consistent and, to this end, be reflected in the functioning of its institutions,
A) tõkestamise osas kutsub nõukogu üles:
A) as regards prevention, calls on the Council to:
a) muutma olemasolev üksikasjalike ja üldiste terrorismivastaste algatuste nimekiri terviklikuks ja ühtseks Euroopa poliitiliseks projektiks terrorismi ja selle juurte vastu võitlemise eesmärgil nii liidus kui ka väljaspool seda;
(a) convert the existing list of detailed and general anti-terrorist initiatives into a comprehensive and coherent European political project for fighting terrorism and its roots, both in and outside the Union;
b) toetama täielikult praegusi pingutusi ning vajaduse korral looma uusi vahendeid ja platvorme hinnangu andmise ning teabevahetuse võimaldamiseks ja edendamiseks politsei- ja luureteenistuste vahel terroristlike organisatsioonide ja nende töömeetodi osas, tunnustades samal ajal andmekaitsepõhimõtteid;
(b) support fully the current efforts and, if necessary and appropriate, create new instruments and platforms to enable and promote diagnosis and exchange of information between police forces and between intelligence services regarding terrorist organisations and their modus operandi, while respecting data protection principles,
c) jälgima finantsasutuste rolli raha ülekandmisel, et vältida kahtlaste rahavoogude kasutamist terroristliku tegevuse rahastamiseks;
(c) monitor the role played by financial institutions in the transfer of money in order to prevent suspect financial flows from being used to fund terrorist activities;
d) välja töötama kõik vajalikud vahendid, et vahetada võimalike terroristide ja nende organisatsioonide kohta teavet kolmandate riikide ning rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonidega, tagades samal ajal privaatsus- ja andmekaitsepõhimõtete austamise;
(d) develop all necessary instruments for exchange of information regarding suspected terrorists and their organisations with third countries and international organisations, while ensuring respect for privacy and data protection principles;
e) looma foorumi teabevahetuseks kõikide Euroopa institutsioonide vahel kaks korda aastas toimuvate kohtumiste põhjal, mille eesmärgiks on kaasa aidata sellisele vahetusele – sellisel juhul mitte operatiivteabe, vaid terroristlike organisatsioonide strateegiat ja töömeetodit ning liidu jõupingutusi nende organisatsioonide vastu võitlemisel käsitlevate andmete vahetusele;
(e) create a forum for the exchange of information between all the European institutions, on the basis of twice-yearly meetings aimed at furthering such exchange in this case, not of operational information but of data on the strategy and modus operandi of the terrorist organisations and the Union’s efforts to fight these organisations;
f) ellu viima laiaulatuslikke tõkestamismeetmeid, mis põhinevad kultuuride ja usundite vahelisel dialoogil, eesmärgiga edendada vastastikust teadlikkust ja mõistmist ning piirata püüdeid kavandada fundamentalistlikku propagandat terroristide värbamise abistamiseks;
(f) conduct wide-ranging preventive action based on a dialogue between cultures and religions with a view to promoting mutual awareness and understanding and to restricting any attempt at fundamentalist propaganda designed to assist the recruitment of terrorists;
g) andma selge toetuse katseprojektidele, mida on edendanud Euroopa Parlament, eesmärgiga hõlbustada teabevahetust politseiteenistuste vahel, võttes arvesse ühenduse andmekaitset käsitlevaid õigusakte;
(g) give its clear support to the pilot project advanced by the EP with a view to facilitating the exchange of information between police forces, taking Community data protection legislation into account;
h) julgustama Europoli ja Eurojusti põhjalikumale spetsialiseerumisele kõnealuse terrorismivormi vastu võitlemisel, tugevdades nende rolli selliste Euroopa mehhanismide hindamisel ja käikulaskmisel, mis võimaldavad vahetada teavet Euroopa Liidu politseiasutuste ja liikmesriikide vahel ning edendades usaldust Euroopa teabevahetusmehhanismide vastu Euroopa Liidu politseiasutuste ja liikmesriikide vahel;
(h) encourage the increasing specialisation of Europol and Eurojust in the fight against this form of terrorism, strengthen their role in diagnosis and in the activation of the European mechanisms for exchange of information between the European Union police authorities and the Member States and promote mutual trust in European mechanisms for exchange of information between European Union police authorities and the Member States,
i) tagama, et Euroopa politseikolledži koolitus- ja spetsialiseerumiskursused võtaksid täielikult arvesse kõiki terrorismivorme, tundes selle sügavat tähtsust liidu tulevikule;
(i) ensure that the training and specialisation courses of the European Police College take full account of all forms of terrorism, given its deep significance for the Union's future;
j) kaasama Euroopa Parlamendi esindajaid kaks korda aastas toimuvatele kohtumistele eesmärgiga tagada nende osalemine mitteoperatiivse teabe andmisel, viies kokku SCIFA, CATSi, EUROPOLi, EUROJUSTi, Euroopa piirivalveagentuuri (EBA), politseijuhtide töökonna (CPTF) ja kriisivaatluskeskuse (SitCen) juhid;
(j) include representatives of the EP, with a view to ensuring their participation in non-operational information, in the twice-yearly meetings bringing together the heads of SCIFA, CATS, EUROPOL, EUROJUST, EBA, CPTF and SitCen;
k) edendada ELi õigusakte, mis on kavandatud maksimaalselt kontrollima selliste keemiliste lähteainete levitamist ja varude soetamist, mida võidakse kasutada lõhkeainete valmistamiseks;
(k) promote EU legislation designed to provide maximum control over the diversion and stockpiling of chemical precursors which may be used in the manufacture of explosives;
B) reageerimise osas kutsub nõukogu üles:
B) as regards response, calls on the Council to:
a) edasi arendama pärast rünnakut automaatselt kohaldatavaid protokolle ja meetmeid;
(a) further develop the protocols and measures to be applied automatically after an attack;
b) varustama Euroopa terrorismivastase koordinaatori bürood ressurssidega, mida on vaja selleks, et kavandada ja koordineerida reageeringut terrorirünnakutele, tagades nii, et reageering oleks võimalikult ühtne ja tõhus;
(b) provide the Office of the European Anti-Tourism Coordinator with the resources it needs in order to devise and coordinate a response to a terrorist attack, thereby ensuring that the response will be as integrated and effective as possible,
– reageering peaks hõlmama teadlikkuse tõstmist ja sotsiaalse mobilisatsiooni edendamist igas ELi liikmesriigis, mitte ainult selles, kus rünnak toimus;
– the response should involve awareness-raising and the promotion of social mobilisation in each and every one of the EU Member States and not only the one in which the attack has occurred;
– samuti tuleks reageerimisel pöörata eritähelepanu ohvrite ja nende perekondade eest hoolitsemisele;
– the response will also take into account the provision of essential care to victims and their families.
c) andma toetust järgmistele terrorismiohvrite abistamise meetmetele:
(c) give its backing to the following measures to aid the victims of terrorism:
– Euroopa Komisjoni juures asuva terrorismiohvrite abistamise Euroopa büroo kui ELi institutsioonide info- ja kontaktasutuse loomine;
– creation of a European Office to Aid Victims of Terrorism based at the Commission, as a reference and contact point vis-à-vis the EU institutions;
– terrorismiohvrite õigusi käsitleva ÜRO konventsiooni eelnõu koostamine;
– drawing-up of a draft UN convention on the rights of the victims of terrorism;
– terrorismile solidaarsusfondist abi taotlemist käsitleva Euroopa Komisjoni algatuse toetamine ja selle kasutamine hüvitusvahendina;
– support for the Commission's initiative for applying the Solidarity Fund to terrorism and using it as an instrument for compensation;
– terrorismiohvritele abi andmise katseprojekti konsolideerimine püsiva eelarverubriigi loomise abil;
– consolidation of the pilot project for aiding victims of terrorism by creating a permanent budget heading,
– terrorismiohvritele ähvarduste tegemisega seotud õigusrikkumiste ja vastavate karistuste kindlaksmääramise ühtlustamise toetamine;
– -support for harmonisation of the definition of the offence of making threats against individuals including the victims of terrorism and the corresponding penalties,
d) toetama ühenduse programme, mis pakuvad kaitset ohvritele, kes on terroriaktide tunnistajad;
(d) support Community programmes offering protection for victims who are witnesses of terrorist acts;
The greatest risk to democracy and coexistence in Europe today is the terrorism promoted by radical Islamist groups.
The greatest risk to democracy and coexistence in Europe today is the terrorism promoted by radical Islamist groups.
The role of the EU institutions in prevention may be summarised in terms of two priority objectives for preventing attacks.
The role of the EU institutions in prevention may be summarised in terms of two priority objectives for preventing attacks.
These priority terrorist prevention objectives for the institutions should be:
These priority terrorist prevention objectives for the institutions should be:
A.- to endeavour to prevent attacks by means of a European-level project for improving the information flow between the different police forces and authorities;
A.- to endeavour to prevent attacks by means of a European-level project for improving the information flow between the different police forces and authorities;
B.- to ensure that the effort being made by the EU institutions is replicated in society.
B.- to ensure that the effort being made by the EU institutions is replicated in society.
Where an attack cannot be prevented, it is essential that all the necessary effort should have been made and transferred during the time concerned, since only thus is it possible to prevent an attack leading to a generalised crisis of confidence.
Where an attack cannot be prevented, it is essential that all the necessary effort should have been made and transferred during the time concerned, since only thus is it possible to prevent an attack leading to a generalised crisis of confidence.
It is necessary to maintain the requisite political effort, developing and regularly publicising a diagnosis by the EU institutions concerning this form of terrorism, which should be the subject of regular debates in the EP where circumstances demand it.
It is necessary to maintain the requisite political effort, developing and regularly publicising a diagnosis by the EU institutions concerning this form of terrorism, which should be the subject of regular debates in the EP where circumstances demand it.
As things stand, the Council Presidency draws up a document evaluating the terrorist threat every six months, but this document is confidential.
As things stand, the Council Presidency draws up a document evaluating the terrorist threat every six months, but this document is confidential.
It would be preferable if its contents could, as far as possible, be explained to Parliament.
It would be preferable if its contents could, as far as possible, be explained to Parliament.
The greatest risk in present circumstances is that the sensation of paralysis, of inaction, of not knowing what to do should spread beyond the EU institutions, and that feelings of this nature on the part of the people of Europe towards the Union institutions should dominate at the very moment when an attack could take place.
The greatest risk in present circumstances is that the sensation of paralysis, of inaction, of not knowing what to do should spread beyond the EU institutions, and that feelings of this nature on the part of the people of Europe towards the Union institutions should dominate at the very moment when an attack could take place.
To deal with this emerging phenomenon, it is not enough to make a long list of actions, many of them general in nature.
To deal with this emerging phenomenon, it is not enough to make a long list of actions, many of them general in nature.
We need to set priorities, to be clear what kind of organisation(s) we are facing, and then communicate our effort.
We need to set priorities, to be clear what kind of organisation(s) we are facing, and then communicate our effort.
A double communication effort is required: firstly, we have to reiterate the seriousness of the threat, giving it its full weight while avoiding hysteria; and secondly, we have to put across an idea of the nature of the effort, of the European political project to counteract terrorism.
A double communication effort is required: firstly, we have to reiterate the seriousness of the threat, giving it its full weight while avoiding hysteria; and secondly, we have to put across an idea of the nature of the effort, of the European political project to counteract terrorism.
Reaction is no longer enough
Reaction is no longer enough
The terrible attacks of 11 September 2001 in New York led to a number of initiatives on the part of the EU, notably the European arrest warrant.
The terrible attacks of 11 September 2001 in New York led to a number of initiatives on the part of the EU, notably the European arrest warrant.
Following the tragic attacks of 11 March 2004 in Madrid, an anti-terrorist action plan was put in place.
Following the tragic attacks of 11 March 2004 in Madrid, an anti-terrorist action plan was put in place.
Today ever firmer action is expected of an EU which has to prove its capacity to act in the area of prevention.
Today ever firmer action is expected of an EU which has to prove its capacity to act in the area of prevention.
As the most recent attacks (the tragic attacks of Madrid) recede into the background, the political dynamic around the phenomenon is visibly lessening.
As the most recent attacks (the tragic attacks of Madrid) recede into the background, the political dynamic around the phenomenon is visibly lessening.
This is a serious error.
This is a serious error.
The best form of prevention is to draw up a political project at European level, bringing together the Council, the Commission and Parliament.
The best form of prevention is to draw up a political project at European level, bringing together the Council, the Commission and Parliament.