natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisjon teavitab sellest ka nõukogu, Euroopa Parlamenti ja liikmesriike.
The Commission shall also notify the Council , the European Parliament and the Member States thereof.
Artikli 22 lõige 2
Article 22, paragraph 2
Iga liikmesriik võib kooskõlas artiklitega 19, 20 või 21 tehtud otsuse saata kümne päeva jooksul nõukogule.
Any Member State may refer a decision taken in accordance with Articles 19, 20 or 21 to the Council within ten days.
Nõukogu võib kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega võtta 30 päeva jooksul vastu teistsuguse otsuse.
The Council, acting by qualified majority, may adopt a different decision within 30 days.
Nõukogu võib pärast Euroopa Parlamendi teavitamist kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega võtta 30 päeva jooksul vastu teistsuguse otsuse.
The Council, acting by qualified majority, may adopt a different decision within 30 days , after informing the European Parliament .
Artikli 25 lõige 3
Article 25, paragraph 3
Komisjon jälgib tihedas koostöös liikmesriikidega CN-koodi 0803 00 19, tariifirubriikide 0603, 1006 ja 1701 ning CN-koodide 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 14 90, 1604 19 39 ja 1604 20 70 alla kuuluvate toodete importi, et teha kindlaks, kas artiklites 20 ja 21 osutatud tingimused on täidetud.
The Commission shall, in close cooperation with Member States, monitor the imports of products of CN code 0803 00 19, of tariff headings 0603, 1006, and 1701 and of CN codes 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 14 90, 1604 19 39 and 1604 20 70 in order to determine whether the conditions referred to in Articles 20 and 21 are fulfilled.
Komisjon jälgib tihedas koostöös liikmesriikidega CN-koodi 0803 00 19, tariifirubriikide 0603, 1006 ja 1701 ning CN-koodide 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 14 90, 1604 19 39, 1604 20 70, 1604 14 16 ja 1604 19 31 alla kuuluvate toodete importi, et teha kindlaks, kas artiklites 20 ja 21 osutatud tingimused on täidetud.
The Commission shall, in close cooperation with Member States, monitor the imports of products of CN code 0803 00 19, of tariff headings 0603, 1006, and 1701 and of CN codes 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 14 90, 1604 19 39 , 1604 20 70 , 1604 14 16 and 1604 19 31 in order to determine whether the conditions referred to in Articles 20 and 21 are fulfilled.
The inclusion in Article 25 of these sections referring to tuna ribs and processed products, so that they are covered by its monitoring and follow-up procedures, is necessary because these are extremely sensitive products.
The inclusion in Article 25 of these sections referring to tuna ribs and processed products, so that they are covered by its monitoring and follow-up procedures, is necessary because these are extremely sensitive products.
Muudatusettepanek 48
Amendment 48
Artikkel 25 a
Article 25 a (new)
Komisjon teavitab Euroopa Parlamenti regulaarselt järgnevast:
The Commission shall keep Parliament periodically informed with regard to:
a) Euroopa Liidu ja GSP raames soodustatud riikide vahelise kaubanduse statistika;
(a) trade statistics between the European Union and GSP beneficiary countries;
b) III lisas esitatud konventsioonide ratifitseerimise ja tõhusa rakendamise olukord iga riigi kohta, mis saab stimuleerivast erikorrast soodustusi.
(b) the status of ratification and implementation of the conventions included in Annex III by each country benefitting from the special incentive arrangement.
Vajadusel lisab Euroopa Komisjon soovitused selle kohta, kas konkreetses riigis tuleks astuda täiendavaid samme konventsiooni tõhusaks rakendamiseks;
Where appropriate, the Commission will include recommendations on whether additional steps for the effective implementation of a convention should be taken by a specific country;
c) asjakohane info progressist millenniumi arengueesmärkide suunas, eelkõige vähimarenenud riikide kohta.
(c) relevant information on progress towards the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, especially in Least Developed Countries.
Komisjon valmistab ette üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava mõjuhindamise uuringu ajavahemiku kohta 1. juulist 2005 kuni 1. jaanuarini 2007.
The Commission shall prepare an impact assessment study of the effects of the GSP covering the period from 1 July 2005 to 1 January 2007.
Uuring edastatakse komiteele, Euroopa Parlamendile ning Euroopa majandus- ja sotsiaalkomiteele 1. märtsiks 2007.
The study shall be transmitted to the Committee, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee by 1 March 2007.
Euroopa Komisjon koostab pärast komisjoniga konsulteerimist käesoleva määruse lõikes 2 viidatud mõjude hindamise, mis sisaldab soodustatud riikide seisukohti, samuti vähemalt järgnevaid elemente:
The Commission, after consulting the Committee, will set the contents of the impact-assessment study referred to in paragraph2, which shall include the views of the beneficiary countries and in any event shall contain at least the following elements:
– põhjalik statistiline analüüs üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava kasutamise määra kohta igas riigis, mis sisaldaks ka eelnevate aastate näitajate võrdlust;
- an in-depth statistical analysis of GSP utilisation rates per country and section including a comparison with previous years;
– hinnang astmestamise sotisaalsete ja kaubandusega seotud mõjude kohta asjaomastes riikides;
- an evaluation of the social and trade-related effects of graduation on graduated countries;
– eelhinnang tulevase astmestamise mõjude kohta riikidele, millele tõenäoliselt kohaldatakse astmestamist järgmise määrusega;
- a preliminary assessment of the effects of future graduation on the countries likely to be graduated under the next regulation;
– võrdlusuuring üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava ning AKV-ELi Cotonou kokkuleppe alusel AKV riikidele pakutava sooduskohtlemise kohta, eesmärgiga pakkuda neile üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kavaga vähemalt samaväärset sooduskohtlemist kui neil oli Cotonou kokkuleppega;
- a comparative study of the preferential treatment offered by the GSP and the ACP-EU Cotonou Agreement to ACP countries, with a view to providing them, in a revised regulation, with at least an equivalent preferential treatment to the one they were granted under the Cotonou Agreement;
– soodustuste süsteemi laiendamisega tundlike toodete soodustuse ülemmäära ja/või "tundlike" toodete ümbermõistmisega "mitte-tundlike" toodete kategooriasse kaasnevate potentsiaalsete mõjude analüüs;
- an analysis of the potential effects of extending the system of preferences by increasing the preferential margin accorded for sensitive products and/or transferring 'sensitive' products to the 'non-sensitive' category;
– hinnang käesoleva määruse panusest millenniumi arengueesmärkide saavutamisel, eelkõige vähimarenenud maade osas.
- an evaluation of the contribution of this regulation to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), in particular in relation to LDCs.
Doha vooru lõppedes esitab komisjon Euroopa Parlamendile eriaruande, milles uurib läbirääkimiste mõju käesoleva määrusega kehtestatud skeemile ja kaalub üldiste soodustuste süsteemi tõhususe tagamiseks plaanitavaid meetmeid.
The Commission shall submit a special report to the European Parliament at the conclusion of the Doha Round, examining the impact of the negotiations on the scheme established in this Regulation and considering the measures to be adopted to ensure the effectiveness of the generalised system of preferences.
Artikli 26 lõige 3
Article 26, paragraph 3
Komitee uurib ühenduse üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava mõjusid ajavahemikku 1. aprillist 2005 kuni 31. detsembrini 2008 käsitleva komisjoni aruande põhjal.
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of a report from the Commission covering the period 1 April 2005 to 31 December 2008.
Kõnealune aruanne hõlmab kõiki artikli 1 lõikes 2 osutatud sooduskordi.
This report shall cover all preferential arrangements referred to in Article 1(2).
Komitee uurib ühenduse üldiste tariifsete soodustuse kava mõjusid artikli 25 a osutatud mõjuhindamise uuringu põhjal .
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 25a.
In order to adequately review the Regulation in 2008, a good impact-assessment study on the functioning of the system during the period 2005 to 2007 is necessary.
In order to adequately review the Regulation in 2008, a good impact-assessment study on the functioning of the system during the period 2005 to 2007 is necessary.
Artikli 30 lõige 1
Article 30, paragraph 1
Käesolev määrus jõustub 1. aprillil 2005.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 2501/2001 tunnistatakse kehtetuks 1. aprillil 2005.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 is repealed with effect from 1 April 2005.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 2501/2001 tunnistatakse kehtetuks 1. aprillil 2005 piiramata lõiget 1 a.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 is repealed with effect from 1 April 2005 without prejudice to paragraph 1a .
Artikli 30 lõige 1 a (uus)
Article 30, paragraph 1 a (new)
Nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 2501/2001 sätted, mis sisalduvad II jao 2. ja 4. jaotises, III jao 1. ja 2. jaotises ning IV jaos säilitatakse, kuni Euroopa Liidu Teatajas avaldatakse nimekiri nendest soodustatud riikidest, kellel on õigus osa saada käesoleva määruse jaotises 2 sätestatud stimuleerivast erikorrast.
Sections 2 and 4 of Title II, Sections 1 and 2 of Title III, and Title IV of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 shall remain applicable until the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the list of the beneficiary countries entitled to benefit from the special incentive arrangement provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation.
Nõukogu määruses (EÜ) nr 2501/2001 kehtestatud stimuleeriv erikord jääb kehtima kuni 31. detsembrini 2005, ja seda kohaldatakse neile soodustatud riikidele, keda ei ole käesoleva määruse jaotises 2 loetud stimuleerivast erikorrast kasu saavate riikide hulka.
The special incentive arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 shall remain applicable until 31 December 2005 to the beneficiary countries that are not included in the list of beneficiary countries for the special incentive arrangement provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation.
This provision presents the possibility of a loophole for beneficiary countries in the interim period between the repeal of the previous special incentive arrangements and the entry into force of the new one.
This provision presents the possibility of a loophole for beneficiary countries in the interim period between the repeal of the previous special incentive arrangements and the entry into force of the new one.
This could also facilitate an early application of the new Regulation in accordance with Amendment 2 in order to guarantee the principle of legitimate trust and sound administration, and in order to prevent undesirable and unwanted damage to beneficiary countries and economic operators.
This could also facilitate an early application of the new Regulation in accordance with Amendment 2 in order to guarantee the principle of legitimate trust and sound administration, and in order to prevent undesirable and unwanted damage to beneficiary countries and economic operators.
Artikli 30 lõige 2 a (uus)
Article 30, paragraph 2 a (new)
Komisjon edastab 1. juuniks 2007 nõukogule, Euroopa parlamendile ning majandus- ja sotsiaalkomiteele ajavahemikku 1. jaanuarist 2009 kuni 31. detsembrini 2011 hõlmava muudetud määruse ettepaneku.
The proposal for a revised regulation covering the period 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 shall be transmitted by the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee by 1 June 2007.
Uues ettepanekus võetakse nõuetekohaselt arvesse artikli 25 a lõikes 2 osutatud mõjuhindamise uuringu tulemusi.
The new proposal shall duly take into consideration the results of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 25a(2).
In order to comply with the requirement of one-year predictability requested by beneficiary countries and economic operators, the revised Regulation should be approved by 1 January 2008.
In order to comply with the requirement of one-year predictability requested by beneficiary countries and economic operators, the revised Regulation should be approved by 1 January 2008.
In order to allow for a meaningful consultation with the European Parliament and relevant stakeholders, the proposal should be issued at least six months in advance (1 June 2007).
In order to allow for a meaningful consultation with the European Parliament and relevant stakeholders, the proposal should be issued at least six months in advance (1 June 2007).
This timing enables the Commission to incorporate the findings of the impact-assessment study, which shall be published by 1 March 2007.
This timing enables the Commission to incorporate the findings of the impact-assessment study, which shall be published by 1 March 2007.
Ideally this timing of reporting and revision should be incorporated in future Regulations.
Ideally this timing of reporting and revision should be incorporated in future Regulations.
At all events, this report avoids taking up positions on matters requiring in-depth sectoral analysis which should have been the subject of prior consideration by other committees.19.1.2005
At all events, this report avoids taking up positions on matters requiring in-depth sectoral analysis which should have been the subject of prior consideration by other committees.19.1.2005
ARENGUKOMISJONI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT
Saaja: rahvusvahelise kaubanduse komisjon
for the Committee on International Trade
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek üldiste tariifsete soodustuse kava kohaldamise kohta
on the proposal for a Council regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences
Arvamuse koostaja (*): Margrietus van den Berg
Draftsman(*): Margrietus van den Berg
The proposed regulation for a new scheme of generalised tariff preferences was issued by the Commission on 20 October 2004, and, according to the text proposed by the Commission, should regulate the GSP from 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2008.
The proposed regulation for a new scheme of generalised tariff preferences was issued by the Commission on 20 October 2004, and, according to the text proposed by the Commission, should regulate the GSP from 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2008.
The proposal follows a Communication dated 7 July 2004 setting out the guidelines of the new GSP system for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015.
The proposal follows a Communication dated 7 July 2004 setting out the guidelines of the new GSP system for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015.
Following the presentation of oral questions to the Commission and the Council by the DEVE and INTA Committees, this Communication was widely debated in Plenary on 14 October, and was the subject of a resolution adopted practically unanimously.
Following the presentation of oral questions to the Commission and the Council by the DEVE and INTA Committees, this Communication was widely debated in Plenary on 14 October, and was the subject of a resolution adopted practically unanimously.
Since its creation in 1971, the GSP has been a key instrument of the EU's Development Policy.
Since its creation in 1971, the GSP has been a key instrument of the EU's Development Policy.
Indeed, every year the EU "donates" 2.2 billion USD dollars in the form of trade preferences, which is actually superior to the level of official development aid.
Indeed, every year the EU "donates" 2.2 billion USD dollars in the form of trade preferences, which is actually superior to the level of official development aid.
It is the responsibility of the Development Committee in particular and of the European Parliament in general to maintain this strong development focus of the GSP system.
It is the responsibility of the Development Committee in particular and of the European Parliament in general to maintain this strong development focus of the GSP system.
The reforms proposed in the draft regulation were previously outlined by the Commission in its Communication of 7 July, to which the Parliament reacted on 14 October with a resolution adopted by a large majority.
The reforms proposed in the draft regulation were previously outlined by the Commission in its Communication of 7 July, to which the Parliament reacted on 14 October with a resolution adopted by a large majority.
As the EP stated in that resolution, the draftsman strongly supports the objectives set out in the Communication and further developed in the draft regulation, such us the simplification, stabilisation and clarification of the arrangements, the concentration of preferences on those developing countries most in need, and the enhancement of the sustainable development component.
As the EP stated in that resolution, the draftsman strongly supports the objectives set out in the Communication and further developed in the draft regulation, such us the simplification, stabilisation and clarification of the arrangements, the concentration of preferences on those developing countries most in need, and the enhancement of the sustainable development component.
There are, however, some discrepancies between the Communication and the draft regulation issued by the Commission, about which the Parliament should ask for clarification or further information.
There are, however, some discrepancies between the Communication and the draft regulation issued by the Commission, about which the Parliament should ask for clarification or further information.
The first discrepancy between the Communication and the legislative text, observed by the draftsman, is the proposed timing of application of the regulation.
The first discrepancy between the Communication and the legislative text, observed by the draftsman, is the proposed timing of application of the regulation.
Since the beginning of the revision process, and until the 20 of October (the very day this draft regulation was published), the Commission maintained that the date for the new regulation's entry into force would be 1 January 2006.
Since the beginning of the revision process, and until the 20 of October (the very day this draft regulation was published), the Commission maintained that the date for the new regulation's entry into force would be 1 January 2006.
This date was confirmed by Commissioner Pascal Lamy in his speech at the European Parliament plenary session on 14 October.
This date was confirmed by Commissioner Pascal Lamy in his speech at the European Parliament plenary session on 14 October.
As mentioned by many parliamentarians during the debate with Pascal Lamy, this date already implied a tight timetable for consultation with the EP and stakeholders.
As mentioned by many parliamentarians during the debate with Pascal Lamy, this date already implied a tight timetable for consultation with the EP and stakeholders.
For the Commission, it has always been a priority that the GSP instrument should be predictable, and it has always insisted that the new GSP regulation should be adopted at least 12 months before its entry into force.
For the Commission, it has always been a priority that the GSP instrument should be predictable, and it has always insisted that the new GSP regulation should be adopted at least 12 months before its entry into force.
Commissioner Lamy agreed that this period could be shortened to nine months, to provide enough time for a meaningful consultation with the EP.
Commissioner Lamy agreed that this period could be shortened to nine months, to provide enough time for a meaningful consultation with the EP.
The Council recognised, in its conclusions adopted on 12 October, the need for a meaningful consultation with the EP and other stakeholders on the GSP reform, as well as the need to give economic operators adequate time to adapt to the new rules.
The Council recognised, in its conclusions adopted on 12 October, the need for a meaningful consultation with the EP and other stakeholders on the GSP reform, as well as the need to give economic operators adequate time to adapt to the new rules.
Now that the Commission draft has been published, we see that the proposed date for entry into force is 1 July 2005.
Now that the Commission draft has been published, we see that the proposed date for entry into force is 1 July 2005.
The Commission explains that this change was related to a WTO panel brought by India to challenge the GSP drugs regime.
The Commission explains that this change was related to a WTO panel brought by India to challenge the GSP drugs regime.
The ruling obliges the EU to implement changes by 1 July 2005 and the Commission proposes to do this through the proposed reform.
The ruling obliges the EU to implement changes by 1 July 2005 and the Commission proposes to do this through the proposed reform.
However, the draftsman considers that the EU should consider the following factors:
However, the draftsman considers that the EU should consider the following factors:
ü If the new regulation enters into force on 1 July 2005, this could potentially cause enormous damage for the countries currently benefiting from the GSP special arrangements (labour rights, protection of the environment and to combat drug production and trafficking), including the Andean Community and Central American countries.
ü If the new regulation enters into force on 1 July 2005, this could potentially cause enormous damage for the countries currently benefiting from the GSP special arrangements (labour rights, protection of the environment and to combat drug production and trafficking), including the Andean Community and Central American countries.
They will, in theory, qualify for a similar regime (GSP plus) but they will need more than three months to prepare for it.
They will, in theory, qualify for a similar regime (GSP plus) but they will need more than three months to prepare for it.
Some countries, like El Salvador, would need to reform their Constitutions before ratifying some of the conventions.
Some countries, like El Salvador, would need to reform their Constitutions before ratifying some of the conventions.
ü The timetable proposed by the Commission goes against some of the principles previously stated by the Commission itself:
ü The timetable proposed by the Commission goes against some of the principles previously stated by the Commission itself:
- the need for a meaningful consultation with stakeholders
- the need for a meaningful consultation with stakeholders
- the need for predictability for economic operators
- the need for predictability for economic operators
- the need for customs administrations to prepare themselves to apply a new system
- the need for customs administrations to prepare themselves to apply a new system
- the risk of creating a dangerous legal vacuum if the previous regime is repealed by 30 June 2005 (as stated in the proposal), but the new regime is not yet in place.
- the risk of creating a dangerous legal vacuum if the previous regime is repealed by 30 June 2005 (as stated in the proposal), but the new regime is not yet in place.
It would be too optimistic to think that the Commission and the Council will be able to adopt the list of "GSP plus" beneficiaries by 1 July 2005.
It would be too optimistic to think that the Commission and the Council will be able to adopt the list of "GSP plus" beneficiaries by 1 July 2005.
In consequence, in his amendments the draftsman proposes to return to the scheduled date of 1 January 2006, while he encourages the Commission and the Council to look for alternative solutions in order to comply with the WTO ruling without bringing forward the date of entry into force of the current regulation.
In consequence, in his amendments the draftsman proposes to return to the scheduled date of 1 January 2006, while he encourages the Commission and the Council to look for alternative solutions in order to comply with the WTO ruling without bringing forward the date of entry into force of the current regulation.