natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The description of tasks proposed by the Commission does not completely reflect the specific needs at EU level for Gender Equality knowledge.
The description of tasks proposed by the Commission does not completely reflect the specific needs at EU level for Gender Equality knowledge.
The need to enable the Institute to focus on the analysis and expertise delivery has to be emphasised.
The need to enable the Institute to focus on the analysis and expertise delivery has to be emphasised.
Although the knowledge on Gender discrimination is dispersed, there is already a certain quantity of data and statistics available to all Institutions, delivered by competent bodies both at EU and national level.
Although the knowledge on Gender discrimination is dispersed, there is already a certain quantity of data and statistics available to all Institutions, delivered by competent bodies both at EU and national level.
The main problem is the pertinence of this data with regard to policy making and policy implementation.
The main problem is the pertinence of this data with regard to policy making and policy implementation.
The problem of comparability of data should be dealt with through a specific cooperation with relevant statistical bodies, but the burden of data collection, which would require an amount of resources consequently heavier than the one foreseen by Commission's financial statement, should fall within the respective responsible bodies, with a view to guaranteeing the best possible use of resources.
The problem of comparability of data should be dealt with through a specific cooperation with relevant statistical bodies, but the burden of data collection, which would require an amount of resources consequently heavier than the one foreseen by Commission's financial statement, should fall within the respective responsible bodies, with a view to guaranteeing the best possible use of resources.
C. Working Method
C. Working Method
Although the Commission proposal emphasizes the need to have a knowledge exchange-based rationale for the work of the Institute, the structure of this exchange seems too static and does not guarantee an effective added value to the output of the Institute.
Although the Commission proposal emphasizes the need to have a knowledge exchange-based rationale for the work of the Institute, the structure of this exchange seems too static and does not guarantee an effective added value to the output of the Institute.
In this perspective, the Rapporteurs' proposal to create a Gender Equality Network, that would enable all pertinent actors to have a systematic knowledge exchange, focusing on best practices and the most innovative approaches to Gender Mainstreaming has been adopted by the committee.
In this perspective, the Rapporteurs ' proposal to create a Gender Equality Network, that would enable all pertinent actors to have a systematic knowledge exchange, focusing on best practices and the most innovative approaches to Gender Mainstreaming has been adopted by the committee.
The Network should be at the same time a tool to pool information and a tool to maintain a constant exchange profitable to the Institute experts, the National experts and decision-makers, as well as the non governmental organisations and the research centres.
The Network should be at the same time a tool to pool information and a tool to maintain a constant exchange profitable to the Institute experts, the National experts and decision-makers, as well as the non governmental organisations and the research centres.
D. Independence of the Institute
D. Independence of the Institute
The independence of the Institute ought to be emphasised further.
The independence of the Institute ought to be emphasised further.
Since its tasks go well beyond technical support to the Commission, there is a clear need to underline the independence of the Institute.
Since its tasks go well beyond technical support to the Commission, there is a clear need to underline the independence of the Institute.
It is surprising that there are two proposals from the Commission, one concerning the Gender Institute and the other concerning the Fundamental Rights Agency, with substantial difference concerning the independence of such bodies.
It is surprising that there are two proposals from the Commission, one concerning the Gender Institute and the other concerning the Fundamental Rights Agency, with substantial difference concerning the independence of such bodies.
E. Structure of the Institute
E. Structure of the Institute
The structure of the Institute is functional to its objectives, its tasks and its independence.
The structure of the Institute is functional to its objectives, its tasks and its independence.
In this perspective, a nomination procedure of the Management Board inspired by the regulation on the Food Safety Agency has been adopted by the committee in order to give a balanced role to the three Institutions.
In this perspective, a nomination procedure of the Management Board inspired by the regulation on the Food Safety Agency has been adopted by the committee in order to give a balanced role to the three Institutions.
The role of the Director is crucial to the good functioning of the Institute, and it should be clearly stated that his/her selection ought to be made in a transparent and open procedure in order to guarantee the most adequate profile for this role.
The role of the Director is crucial to the good functioning of the Institute, and it should be clearly stated that his/her selection ought to be made in a transparent and open procedure in order to guarantee the most adequate profile for this role.
Also the accountability of the Director should be solely towards the management board with no interference from the Commission, since this could lead to a breach of the Institute's independence.
Also the accountability of the Director should be solely towards the management board with no interference from the Commission, since this could lead to a breach of the Institute's independence.
The role of the Advisory Forum ought to be redirected with the creation of the Gender Equality Network.
The role of the Advisory Forum ought to be redirected with the creation of the Gender Equality Network.
The aim is to reinforce the connection between policy making and policy implementation as regards gender mainstreaming and gender equality.
The aim is to reinforce the connection between policy making and policy implementation as regards gender mainstreaming and gender equality.
The role of the Advisory forum should be to contribute to the strategic planning of the Institute, providing an expert input to the Director, as well as coordinating the Gender Mainstreaming activities at national level, in order to ensure a constant bridge between knowledge, policy and implementation.
The role of the Advisory forum should be to contribute to the strategic planning of the Institute, providing an expert input to the Director, as well as coordinating the Gender Mainstreaming activities at national level, in order to ensure a constant bridge between knowledge, policy and implementation.
The amendments proposed aim at enhancing the effectiveness and the pertinence of the Institute's role within the framework of EU policies.
The amendments proposed aim at enhancing the effectiveness and the pertinence of the Institute's role within the framework of EU policies.
However, it seems very difficult to reach the objectives of the Institute without an appropriate financial contribution.
However, it seems very difficult to reach the objectives of the Institute without an appropriate financial contribution.
Even if the financial statement of the commission is purely indicative, it is clear that in such circumstances we risk creating a 'paper tiger' that could lead to seriously damage the credibility of the EU commitment to Gender Equality.
Even if the financial statement of the commission is purely indicative, it is clear that in such circumstances we risk creating a 'paper tiger' that could lead to seriously damage the credibility of the EU commitment to Gender Equality.
Pr Anna Záborská
Mrs Anna Záborská
Teema: Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega luuakse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituut ( KOM(2005)0081 — C6-0083/2005 — 2005/0017(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality ( COM(2005)0081 – C6‑0083/2005 – 2005/0017(COD) )
ELTs seni avaldamata. — arvamus õigusliku aluse kohta
Not yet published in OJ.
Austatud proua esimees
Dear Madam Chairwoman,
31. jaanuari 2006. aasta kirjas palusite õiguskomisjonilt vastavalt kodukorra artikli 35 lõikele 2 arvamust Euroopa Komisjoni ülalmainitud ettepaneku õigusliku aluse kehtivuse ja sobivuse kohta.
By letter of 31 January 2006 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Parlamendikomisjon arutas eespool nimetatud küsimust 23. veebruari 2006. a koosolekul.
The Committee considered the above question at its meeting of 23 February 2006.
Ettepanek põhineb EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 13 lõike 2 ja artikli 141 lõike 3 kahekordsel õiguslikul alusel.
The proposal is based on the dual legal basis of Articles 13(2) and 141(3) of the EC Treaty.
Naiste õiguste ja soolise võrdõiguslikkuse komisjon võttis 24. jaanuaril 2006. aastal oma raportiga vastu muudatusettepaneku, millega lisatakse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 3 lõige 2 õigusliku alusena ettepaneku algsele kahekordsele õiguslikule alusele.
The Committee on Woman's Rights and Gender Equality adopted on 24 January 2006, with its report, an amendment which adds Article 3(2) of the EC Treaty as a legal basis to the original dual legal basis of the proposal.
Euroopa Kohtu väljakujunenud kohtupraktikast nähtub, et õigusliku aluse valik ei ole subjektiivne, vaid "peab põhinema kohtulikult kontrollitavatel objektiivsetel teguritel
It is clear from settled case-law of the Court of Justice that the choice of legal basis is not a subjective one, but "must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review"
Nende elementide hulka kuuluvad esmajärjekorras õigusakti eesmärk ja sisu
Among these elements are, in particular, the aim and content of the legal act.
Arvestades, et ettepaneku eesmärk ja sisu on soolise võrdõiguslikkuse instituudi loomine, mis pakuks ühenduse institutsioonidele ja liikmesriikidele tehnilist tuge soolise diskrimineerimise vastases võitluses ning meeste ja naiste võrdõiguslikkuse edendamisel ühenduse kõikides pädevusvaldkondades, on vajalik tugineda artikli 141 lõike 3 ja artikli 13 lõike 2 kombineeritud kahekordsele õiguslikule alusele.
Given the proposal's aim and content of establishing the Institute for Gender Equality, which is designed to provide technical support to the Community Institutions and the Member States in the fight against discrimination based on sex and the promotion of equality between men and women in all areas of Community competence, there is a need to have recourse to a dual legal basis of Article 141(3) and Article 13(2) combined.
Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artikli 141 lõige 3 on selliste meetmete määratud õiguslik alus, mille eesmärgiks on tagada meeste ja naiste võrdsete võimaluste ja võrdse kohtlemise põhimõte tööhõive ja elukutsega seotud küsimustes, sellal kui asutamislepingu artikli 13 lõige 2 võimaldab võtta vastu ühenduse stimuleerivad meetmed, välja arvatud liikmesriikide õigusnormide mis tahes ühtlustamine, mis toetavad ja edendavad võitlust soolise diskrimineerimisega väljaspool tööhõivevaldkonda.
Article 141(3) EC is the specific legal basis for measures aimed to ensure the application of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation, whereas Article 13(2) EC permits the adoption of Community incentive measures, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States, in order to support and promote the objective of combating discrimination on grounds of sex beyond the field of employment.
Asutamislepingu artikli 3 lõike 2 "läbilõikeline eesmärk" ei kujuta endast siiski õiguslikku alust.
However, the "cross-section purpose" of Article 3 (2) EC does not constitute a legal basis.
Selle artikli kohaselt on ühenduse eesmärk meeste ja naiste ebavõrdsuse kaotamine ja võrdõiguslikkuse aktiivne edendamine kõigis ettevõtmistes, kindlustades seega meeste ja naiste võrdõiguslikkuse dimensiooni kaasamise kogu ühenduse poliitikasse.
That Article requires the Community to aim to eliminate inequalities, and actively to promote equality, between men and women in all its activities and thus to ensure that the dimension of equality between men and women is integrated in all Community policies.
Artiklis määratletakse ühenduse kohustus kaotada ebavõrdsus ja edendada soolist võrdõiguslikkust kogu ühenduse poliitikas.
It defines an obligation of the Community to eliminate inequalities and to promote gender equality in all Community policies.
Seetõttu ei peaks lisama artikli 3 lõiget 2 määruse ettepaneku kahekordsele õiguslikule alusele.
Consequently, Article 3(2) should not be added to the dual legal basis of the proposed regulation.
23. veebruari 2006. aasta koosolekul otsustas õiguskomisjon ühehäälselt
At its meeting of 23 February 2006 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Lõpphääletuse ajal olid kohal: Giuseppe Gargani (esimees), Andrzej Jan Szenja (aseesimees), Diana Wallis (arvamuse koostaja), Maria Berger, Janelly Fourtou (Viktória Mohįcsi asendusliige), Jean-Paul Gauzčs (Kurt Lechneri asendusliige), Adeline Hazan (Katalin Lévai asendusliige), Piia-Noora Kauppi, Aloyzas Sakalas, Nicola Zingaretti ja Jaroslav Zvěřina. , et EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 13 lõike 2 ja artikli 141 lõike 3 kahekordne õiguslik alus on ettepanekule sobiv õiguslik alus.
The following were present for the vote Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Andrzej Jan Szejna (vice-chairman), Diana Wallis (draftswoman), Maria Berger, Janelly Fourtou (for Viktória Mohácsi), Jean-Paul Gauzès (for Kurt Lechner), Adeline Hazan (for Katalin Lévai), Piia-Noora Kauppi, Aloyzas Sakalas, Nicola Zingaretti and Jaroslav Zvěřina. , that the dual legal basis of Articles 13(2) and 141(3) of the EC Treaty is the appropriate legal basis for the proposal.
eelarvekomisjonI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS
Saaja: naiste õiguste ja soolise võrdõiguslikkuse komisjon
for the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality
After a positive feasibility study, the Employment, Social Affairs, Health and Consumers Affairs Council of 1-2 June 2004 fully supported the principle of setting up an Institute for Gender Equality, while it stressed the importance of a structure which would bring added value and would not duplicate existing activities.
After a positive feasibility study, the Employment, Social Affairs, Health and Consumers Affairs Council of 1-2 June 2004 fully supported the principle of setting up an Institute for Gender Equality, while it stressed the importance of a structure which would bring added value and would not duplicate existing activities.
The need for budget neutrality was also mentioned.
The need for budget neutrality was also mentioned.
Based on an ex-ante evaluation, and in line with the above-mentioned discussions, the Commission has now submitted this proposal for a Regulation establishing an Institute for Gender Equality as a new agency.
Based on an ex-ante evaluation, and in line with the above-mentioned discussions, the Commission has now submitted this proposal for a Regulation establishing an Institute for Gender Equality as a new agency.
From 2007 on a new budget heading with two budget lines will be created:
From 2007 on a new budget heading with two budget lines will be created:
- 04 05 04 01 : European Institute for gender equality - Subsidy to titles 1 & 2
- 04 05 04 01 : European Institute for gender equality - Subsidy to titles 1 & 2
- 04 05 04 02 : European Institute for gender equality – Subsidy to title 3
- 04 05 04 02 : European Institute for gender equality – Subsidy to title 3
The duration of the action/financial impact will be from 1 January 2007 – 31 December 2013.
The duration of the action/financial impact will be from 1 January 2007 – 31 December 2013.
Since from 2007 onwards the allocation of appropriations will depend on the new financial perspective 2007-2013, the annual amounts decided upon for this period, as summarised in the following table, are considered to be purely indicative:
Since from 2007 onwards the allocation of appropriations will depend on the new financial perspective 2007-2013, the annual amounts decided upon for this period, as summarised in the following table, are considered to be purely indicative:
Subsidy for Titles 1 and 2
Subsidy for Titles 1 and 2
Subsidy for Title 3
Subsidy for Title 3
Administra-tive expenditure
Administra-tive expenditure
Total indicative financial cost
Total indicative financial cost
Human resource requirements (including officials, temporary and external staff) of the institute are given as follows:
Human resource requirements (including officials, temporary and external staff) of the institute are given as follows:
Total number of statutory personnel
Total number of statutory personnel
In addition to the 23 agencies that already figure in the draft for the 2006 budget, the current proposal aims at creating the "European Institute for Gender Equality" as yet another decentralised agency.
In addition to the 23 agencies that already figure in the draft for the 2006 budget, the current proposal aims at creating the "European Institute for Gender Equality" as yet another decentralised agency.
While your draftswoman recognises the importance of decentralised agencies as a proper response to operational needs in order to improve the management of the activities of the European Union, their ever-increasing number and financial needs are a constant source of concern.
While your draftswoman recognises the importance of decentralised agencies as a proper response to operational needs in order to improve the management of the activities of the European Union, their ever-increasing number and financial needs are a constant source of concern.
The Temporary committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means has estimated the overall cost of the existing agencies for the coming seven year period at EUR 2,3 billion.
The Temporary committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means has estimated the overall cost of the existing agencies for the coming seven year period at EUR 2,3 billion.
Each new agency will further increase this amount.
Each new agency will further increase this amount.
If an agreement on the next financial framework should bring about reductions compared to the Commission's proposal, the decentralised agencies will need to participate in such a reduction, as has already been pointed out by your draftswoman on several occasions.
If an agreement on the next financial framework should bring about reductions compared to the Commission's proposal, the decentralised agencies will need to participate in such a reduction, as has already been pointed out by your draftswoman on several occasions.
The establishment of the Gender Equality Institute, or any new agency, at this point, before an agreement on the new financial perspective has been reached, can only come about against a background of significant budgetary uncertainties.
The establishment of the Gender Equality Institute, or any new agency, at this point, before an agreement on the new financial perspective has been reached, can only come about against a background of significant budgetary uncertainties.
According to the Commission proposal, the new Gender Equality Institute will require some EUR 52 million for the period from 2007 to 2013, an amount which at the moment cannot be guaranteed (Amendments 1 and 2).
According to the Commission proposal, the new Gender Equality Institute will require some EUR 52 million for the period from 2007 to 2013, an amount which at the moment cannot be guaranteed (Amendments 1 and 2).
Unlike in other cases, the creation of the Gender Equality Institute is not to the detriment of other programmes under the same policy area because it is to be fully financed through the Fifth Strand of PROGRESS.
Unlike in other cases, the creation of the Gender Equality Institute is not to the detriment of other programmes under the same policy area because it is to be fully financed through the Fifth Strand of PROGRESS.
Nevertheless, your draftswoman would still like to reiterate that she is in favour of the establishment of a binding ceiling for agencies which could only be increased by decision of the budgetary authority.
Nevertheless, your draftswoman would still like to reiterate that she is in favour of the establishment of a binding ceiling for agencies which could only be increased by decision of the budgetary authority.
Eelarvekomisjon palub vastutaval naiste õiguste ja soolise võrdõiguslikkuse komisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
ELT C ...., ..., lk .....
OJ C ...., ..., p. ....
Instituut alustab tegevust kaheteistkümne kuu jooksul alates käesoleva määruse jõustumisest.
The institute shall be operational within twelve months of the entry into force of this Regulation.
Instituut alustab tegevust kaheteistkümne kuu jooksul alates käesoleva määruse jõustumisest , kuid mitte enne lõpliku otsuse tegemist instituudi asukoha suhtes .
The institute shall be operational within twelve months of the entry into force of this Regulation but not before a final decision has been taken regarding its seat .
Instituut alustab oma tegevust lõplikul asukohal, et vältida mittevajalikke kulutusi, nagu ajutisest asukohast ümberkolimine ning muid sellega seotud kulutusi.
The institute shall operate at its final seat right from the very beginning in order to avoid unnecessary costs like removal from a temporary seat and any related expenditure.
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega luuakse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituut
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality
Jutta D. Haug 20.9.2004
Jutta D. Haug 20.9.2004
põhiseaduskomisjonI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS
Põhiseaduskomisjon palub vastutaval naiste õiguste ja soolise võrdõiguslikkuse komisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, eriti selle artikli 13 lõiget 2 ja artikli 141 lõiget 3 ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 13(2) and 141(3) thereof,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, eriti selle artikli 3 lõiget 2, artikli 13 lõiget 2 ja artikli 141 lõiget 3,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 3(2), 13(2) and 141(3) thereof,
Ettepaneku õigusliku aluse sidususe ja mõistetavuse huvides tuleks antud uut ühenduse „läbivat eesmärki” tsiteerida koos ettepaneku otseseks õiguslikuks aluseks olevate artiklitega.
This new "cross-section-purpose" of the Community ought to be quoted alongside the articles forming strictly speaking the legal base of the proposal to make it coherent and more understandable.