natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist nõukogule ja Euroopa Parlamendile "Ühise varjupaigamenetluse ja kogu liidus ühtse pagulasseisundi kehtestamise suunas" ( KOM(2000)0755 );
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament ‘Towards a common asylum procedure and a uniform status, valid throughout the Union, for persons granted asylum’ ( COM(2000)0755 ),
– võttes arvesse UNHCRi täitevkomitee poolt vastu võetud kaitsekava või -programmi, mille ÜRO Peaassamblee 2002. a pärast ülemaailmseid rahvusvahelist kaitset puudutavaid konsultatsioone vastu võttis;
– having regard to the Agenda or Programme for Protection, adopted by the Executive Committee of the UNHCR and welcomed by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2002 after worldwide consultations on international protection,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist nõukogule ja Euroopa Parlamendile ühise varjupaigapoliitika ja kaitsekava kohta ( KOM(2003)0152 );
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the common asylum policy and the Agenda for protection ( COM(2003)0152 ),
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist nõukogule ja Euroopa Parlamendile "Juurdepääsetavama, õiglasema ja paremini reguleeritud varjupaigasüsteemi suunas" ( KOM(2003)0315 );
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament ‘Towards more accessible, equitable and managed asylum systems’ ( COM(2003)0315 ),
– võttes arvesse kodanikuvabaduste, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjoni raportit ja välisasjade komisjoni arvamust ( A6-0051/2004 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0051/2004 ),
A. arvestades, et Thessaloniki Euroopa Ülemkogu kutsus lõppjärelduse punktis 26 Euroopa Komisjoni üles "uurima kõiki parameetreid, et tagada rahvusvahelist kaitset vajavate isikute korrakohane ja paremini korraldatud sisenemine ELi ning välja selgitada viisid ja vahendid päritolupiirkondade kaitsesuutlikkuse suurendamiseks ning esitada nõukogule enne 2004. a asjakohane ulatuslik raport koos ettepanekutega meetmete, sh nende õigusliku mõju, kohta";
A. whereas point 26 of the conclusions of the European Council in Thessaloniki called on the Commission ‘to explore all parameters in order to ensure more orderly and managed entry in the EU of persons in need of international protection and to examine ways and means to enhance the protection capacity of regions of origin with a view to presenting to the Council, before June 2004, a comprehensive report suggesting measures to be taken, including legal implications’,
B. arvestades, et käesoleva resolutsiooni aluseks olevad Euroopa Komisjoni teatised tuleks koos läbi vaadata, sest vaatamata nende erinevale tagapõhjale on nad ühtlasi Euroopa Komisjoni vastus Thessaloniki Euroopa Ülemkogu lõppjäreldustele 26 ja 27 ning käsitlevad võimaliku uue lähenemise eeldusi ja põhilisi eesmärke liikumisel paremini korraldatud, juurdepääsetavamate ja õiglasemate varjupaigasüsteemide suunas, samal ajal tuleks leida uusi viise Tamperes määratletud järkjärgulise lähtepunkti saavutamiseks;
B. whereas the Commission’s two communications which are the subject of this resolution should be considered together, since although the reasons behind them are different, they constitute the Commission’s response to points 26 and 27 respectively of the conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council, and tackle the premises and basic objectives of a possible new approach to better managed, more accessible and fair asylum systems, exploring new ways of achieving the gradual approach defined at Tampere,
C. arvestades, et jätkuvalt tuleks lähtuda Genfi konventsioonist ja rahvusvahelisest kohustusest võtta vastu kõik piiril varjupaika taotlevad isikud;
C. whereas the Geneva Convention and the international obligation to receive any person requesting asylum at borders should remain the rule,
D. arvestades vajadust sõlmida kokkuleppeid ELi ja kolmandate riikide vahel, et parandada juurdepääsu jagatud vastutuse põhimõttele tuginevatele kestvatele lahendustele pagulaste ning kaitset või poliitilist varjupaika vajavate isikute osas;
D. whereas there is a need to conclude agreements between the EU and third countries in order to improve access to durable solutions for refugees or persons in need of protection or political asylum based on the principle of shared responsibility,
1. mõistab hukka asjaolu, et edu Tampere Euroopa Ülemkogu lõppjäreldustes määratletud Euroopa ühist varjupaigasüsteemi esimest etappi puudutava õigusloome programmi vastu võtmisel saavutati hilinemisega ja et ühtlustamine on toimunud vaid liikmesriikide madalaimate ühiste nimetajate alusel ning et nõukogu ei suutnud 29. aprillini 2004 liikmesriikides pagulasseisundi andmise või äravõtmise menetluste miinimumnõudeid käsitleva direktiivi ettepaneku osas poliitilist kokkulepet saavutada;
Deplores the fact that the progress made in the adoption of the legislative programme for the first stage of a European common asylum system defined in the conclusions of the Tampere European Council has been delayed, that harmonisation is based on the lowest common denominator of the Member States, and that the Council was unable until 29 April 2004 to reach a political agreement on the modified proposal for a directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
4. usub, et on veel palju teha tagamaks, et EList saab ühtne varjupaigaala ja et meie kodanikud usaldavad süsteemi, mis toimib õiglaselt, tõhusalt ja kiiresti, osutades nii kaitset neile, kes seda vajavad, kui tegeledes nendega, kes kaitset ei vaja;
Believes that much further work remains to be done to safeguard the EU as a single asylum space and ensure that our citizens have confidence in a system which acts fairly, efficiently and promptly both in giving protection to those who need it and in dealing with those without protection requirements;
a) parandada varjupaigaga seotud otsuste tegemise kvaliteeti Euroopa Liidus,
(a) to improve the quality of asylum decision-making in the European Union,
b) täita põhirolli suutlikkuse suurendamise tagamisel ja aidata riikidel pakkuda varjupaigataotlejatele ja pagulastele tõhusat kaitset, kasutades mõõdupuuna rahvusvahelisi inimõiguste norme;
(b) to be a key player in ensuring capacity-building and to help countries provide effective protection for asylum-seekers and refugees, using international human rights standards as a benchmark,
c) kaitsetaotlustega tegelemine vajadustele võimalikult lähedasel tasandil ja osa rahvusvahelist kaitset vajavate isikute turvalise Euroopa Liitu korrakohase ja korraldatud sisenemise reguleerimine,
(c) to deal with applications for protection at a level as close as possible to needs and to regulate safe access to the EU by means of orderly and managed entry for some of the persons in need of international protection,
d) solidaarsuspõhimõte ja vastutuse õiglane jagamine,
(d) the principle of solidarity and the fair sharing of responsibility,
e) välja töötada terviklik lähenemine, et seada varjupaiga- ja tagasipöördumisalal sisse viivitamatu ja tõhus otsustusprotsess;
(e) to develop an integrated approach with a view to establishing, in the area of asylum and return, a prompt and efficient decision-making process;
8. on taotlusprotsessi “delegeerimise” vastu, mille puhul pagulasseisundi taotlejad saadetakse kolmandasse riiki, sest see raskendab esindusprotsessi ja likvideerib demokraatliku kontrolli;
Rejects ‘outsourcing’ of the process of application by sending applicants for refugee status to a third country, not least because it makes the process of representation more difficult and removes it from democratic oversight;
13. usub, et sellised ümberasumisprogrammid, kui neid õigesti hallatakse ja piisavalt rahastatakse, võivad aidata kaasa pagulaste üldisele mõistmisele ja nende põhjuste mõistmisele, miks pagulased ja teised rahvusvahelist kaitset vajavad inimesed neid vastu võtvates riikides kaitset otsivad ning aitavad kaasa ELi tegevuse tõhustamisele inimkaubandusega võitlemisel;
Trusts that such resettlement programmes, if properly managed and adequately resourced, and sensibly publicised by Member States and the EU, can assist in the development of a public understanding of refugees and their reasons for seeking protection in the countries receiving those refugees and others in need of international protection and in enhancing the efficiency of the EU in combating human trafficking;
15. kutsub ELi üles tõestama nähtavalt ja järjepidevalt oma valmisolekut abistada kolmandate riikide päritolupiirkondi, et suurendada nende kaitsesuutlikkust kooskõlas UNHCRi algatusega Convention Plus ja muude soovitustega;
Calls on the EU to demonstrate in a visible and consistent way its readiness to assist third countries in the regions of origin to enhance their protection capacities according to the UNHCR Convention Plus initiative and other recommendations;
17. kutsub ELi üles tagama vajalike eelarvevahendite kättesaadavaks tegemist lisaks nendele, mis on juba eraldatud kolmandate riikide abistamiseks eesmärgiga suurendada nende arenguriikide rahalist ja institutsionaalset kaitsesuutlikkust, kes on valmis jagama vastutust ELiga antud valdkonnas;
Calls on the EU to ensure that the necessary budgetary means, other than those already envisaged as development aid to third countries, would be made available to enhance financial and institutional protection capacities in developing countries that are ready to share responsibility with the EU in this field;
19 on arvamusel, et otsustav ühine välis- ja julgeolekupoliitika, milles EL seab esikohale pikaajaliste konfliktide lahendamise ja konfliktide vältimise, on äärmiselt oluline, aitamaks neid, kes otsivad kaitset; tervitab seetõttu Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut edendada ELi piirkondlikke kaitseprogramme ja palub, et teda kaasatakse nende väljatöötamise ja rakendamisele vajaliku hinnangu andmise ning järelevalve protsessi;
19 Considers that a decisive common foreign and security policy committing the EU as a matter of priority to the resolution of long-term conflicts and conflict prevention is essential in order to help those seeking protection; therefore welcomes the Commission’s proposals to bring forward EU Regional Protection Programmes and asks to be involved in their development and in the necessary assessment and monitoring of their implementation;
21. rõhutab, et päritolupiirkondade suurendatud kaitsesuutlikkus ja kaitstud riiki sisenemise menetluste loomine viib korrakohase ja ennetatud ELi sisenemise tagamiseni, säilitades olemasoleva varjupaiga taotlemise õiguse spontaanse saabumise korral ELi liikmesriiki;
Stresses that enhancing protection capacity in the regions of origin and creation of the Protected Entry Procedures leads to ensuring an orderly and anticipated manner of entry into the EU, while further maintaining the existing right of application for asylum upon spontaneous arrival in an EU Member State.
24. tunnistab nende riikide toetamise tähtsust, kes võtavad vastu suurema osa varjupaika otsivatest isikutest ja peab oluliseks, et nendes pakutavad tingimused vastaksid tingimustele, mis Euroopa Komisjon oma teatise KOM(2004)0410 lõike 45 punktides a) ja e) esitas;
Recognises the value of supporting those countries which receive the majority of those seeking sanctuary and considers it important that the conditions offered there meet at least those outlined by the Commission in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 45 of communication COM(2004)0410 ;
27. tervitab Euroopa Komisjoni teatist KOM(2004)0503 kaitse tagamise osas esinevate lünkade täitmise protsessi edendamise ja ühise varjupaigapoliitika esimese etapi rakendamise tõhustamise kohta;
Welcomes the Commission's submission of the communication COM(2004)0503 , the purpose of which is to develop the process which would close the protection gap and lead to the effective implementation of the first stage of the common asylum policy;
30. rõhutab vajadust töötada välja ühtlustatud lähenemine, üldised tegevuskavad ja erikokkulepped, mille raames on võimalik sõnastada ja tagada tõhus reageerimine pagulaste kaitseks ja/või saavutada püsivad lahendused päritoluriikides, strateegiad, milles võetakse arvesse parimaid toimimisviise haldusaktide korraldamisel ning võimaldatakse teabevahetust päritolu- ja lähteriikide kohta;
Stresses the need to devise harmonised approaches, general action plans and special agreements capable of formulating and guaranteeing effective responses for the protection of refugees and/or achieving lasting solutions in the countries of origin, strategies which take account of best practices in the management of administrative acts and allow the exchange of information on the countries of origin and provenance;
33. palub, et juhtumite puhul, kui rahvusvahelise kaitse andmisest keeldutakse, kuna need ei vasta nõuetele, tuleks negatiivset otsust asjakohaselt põhjendada ja see edastada kirjalikult kinnitatud dokumendina taotleja emakeeles;
Requests that in cases where any of the types of status of international protection should be refused because the requirements are not met, the unfavourable decision should be duly reasoned and communicated in writing in an authenticated document in the applicant's own language;
36. väljendab sügavat muret olukorra pärast, mis tulevikus paratamatult tekib, kui liikmesriigid peavad rakendama nõukogu 29. aprilli 2004. a direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ miinimumnõuetest selle kohta, millal kolmanda riigi kodanikke või kodakondsuseta isikuid tuleb käsitleda pagulastena või muud rahvusvahelist kaitset vajavate isikutena ja neile antava kaitse tüübi kohta
Expresses its deep concern at the serious situation which will inevitably arise in future if, on the one hand, Member States have to apply Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted
38. on veendunud, et kui direktiivi pagulasseisundi andmise ja äravõtmise menetluse miinimumnorme kehtestava direktiivi kohaldamisala ei laiendata põhjendatud ajutise täiendava kaitse taotlustele, siis tekitaks see kaitse andmise alal põhjendamatu õigusvaakumi, mille tagajärgi muudaks veelgi tõsisemaks see, kui liikmesriigid, andes rahvusvahelist kaitset, lähtuksid eelkõige ajutise täiendava kaitse põhimõtetest, mitte nendest, mis on kehtestatud Genfi konventsioonis pagulasseisundi andmise kohta;
Is convinced that if the Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status is not extended to cases justifying requests for subsidiary protection this would constitute an unjustifiable legal vacuum in the field of protection, the consequences of which would be aggravated by the fact that when the Member States grant international protection they do so on the basis of the reasons for subsidiary protection rather than on those justifying the application of the Geneva Convention on the granting of refugee status;
41. ei näe põhjust anda varjupaigataotluste üle otsustamist liikmesriikidelt üle kesksele ELi asutusele või ELi varjupaigamenetluskeskustele, pidades silmas õiguslikke, praktilisi ja poliitilisi raskusi;
Sees no case for transferring responsibility for deciding asylum claims from the Member States to a central EU authority or EU asylum processing centres in view of the legal, practical and political difficulties;
44. tervitab Euroopa Pagulaste Fondi 2005–2010 asutamist ning rõhutab liikmesriikide suurt vajadust säilitada kuni ühise varjupaigapoliitika sisseseadmiseni piisavad varjupaigasüsteemid ning vastuvõturajatised;
Welcomes the establishment of the European Refugee Fund for 2005-2010 and stresses the urgent need for Member States to maintain adequate asylum systems and reception facilities in the run-up to the establishment of the common asylum procedure;
In general, your rapporteur welcomes these two communications from the Commission concerning the future development of a common asylum policy.
In general, your rapporteur welcomes these two communications from the Commission concerning the future development of a common asylum policy.
She feels it important, however, to establish a clear framework for such future development.
She feels it important, however, to establish a clear framework for such future development.
Parliament has repeatedly stressed the need for a high quality asylum procedure, firmly entrenched in the Geneva Convention and other international instruments.
Parliament has repeatedly stressed the need for a high quality asylum procedure, firmly entrenched in the Geneva Convention and other international instruments.
We took the same view with regard to those in need of international protection (subsidiary protection).
We took the same view with regard to those in need of international protection (subsidiary protection).
Speed and administrative efficiency are important in assessing any system but they cannot be the only criteria when people’s futures are at risk.
Speed and administrative efficiency are important in assessing any system but they cannot be the only criteria when people’s futures are at risk.
The current figures for non-founded asylum claims are often misrepresented as they frequently omit those cases overturned on appeal or inadequately assessed after being fast-tracked through a dubious 'safe-country' assessment.
The current figures for non-founded asylum claims are often misrepresented as they frequently omit those cases overturned on appeal or inadequately assessed after being fast-tracked through a dubious 'safe-country' assessment.
Thus the Commission’s proposal to 'front-load' the assessment process is a welcome one: a single procedure which contains all the information and which is assessed firstly on the basis of the criteria for full refugee status and then, only if those are not met, on a subsidiary protection basis, simplifies the process both for the applicant and the administration.
Thus the Commission’s proposal to 'front-load' the assessment process is a welcome one: a single procedure which contains all the information and which is assessed firstly on the basis of the criteria for full refugee status and then, only if those are not met, on a subsidiary protection basis, simplifies the process both for the applicant and the administration.
However, the quality of the procedure then becomes crucial and the Commission’s aim to improve training, in-country assessment and the related information and judicial procedures is to be welcomed: your rapporteur recalls Parliament’s repeated demands to include the rights to mother-tongue communication, adequate time, legal assistance to prepare and follow through applications and the right of in-country appeal with suspensive effect.
However, the quality of the procedure then becomes crucial and the Commission’s aim to improve training, in-country assessment and the related information and judicial procedures is to be welcomed: your rapporteur recalls Parliament’s repeated demands to include the rights to mother-tongue communication, adequate time, legal assistance to prepare and follow through applications and the right of in-country appeal with suspensive effect.
A procedure to monitor what happens to those who are returned to their country of origin after having their applications rejected is a crucial test of the system’s quality.
A procedure to monitor what happens to those who are returned to their country of origin after having their applications rejected is a crucial test of the system’s quality.
Your rapporteur notes the tension between the requirements of the Qualifications Directive concerning a single procedure and those of the Minimum Requirements Directive, which does not apply to countries not already implementing the practice of providing subsidiary protection.
Your rapporteur notes the tension between the requirements of the Qualifications Directive concerning a single procedure and those of the Minimum Requirements Directive, which does not apply to countries not already implementing the practice of providing subsidiary protection.
Given that the Minimum Requirements Directive, as currently agreed by Council, has given rise to considerable concerns on a number of grounds, Parliament should be consulted again under the new procedures, in accordance with the Amsterdam and Nice Treaties.
Given that the Minimum Requirements Directive, as currently agreed by Council, has given rise to considerable concerns on a number of grounds, Parliament should be consulted again under the new procedures, in accordance with the Amsterdam and Nice Treaties.
Indeed, provision should be made in Tampere 2 for the assessment of the current package of directives dealing with asylum and related issues, with a view to ensuring their coherence and compliance with human rights instruments.
Indeed, provision should be made in Tampere 2 for the assessment of the current package of directives dealing with asylum and related issues, with a view to ensuring their coherence and compliance with human rights instruments.
Given that in 2003 some 70% of the world’s refugees remained in their region of origin (with only around 20% arriving in the EU), it has long seemed sensible to offer greater protection of better quality in those regions, but to be clear that this is in addition to the EU’s current responsibilities to offer protection under international agreements.
Given that in 2003 some 70% of the world’s refugees remained in their region of origin (with only around 20% arriving in the EU), it has long seemed sensible to offer greater protection of better quality in those regions, but to be clear that this is in addition to the EU’s current responsibilities to offer protection under international agreements.
The additional measures proposed, which offer the means for managed, legal entry into the EU are to be welcomed, not least if they help to reduce trafficking, although that is often connected to migration rather than a need to seek sanctuary.
The additional measures proposed, which offer the means for managed, legal entry into the EU are to be welcomed, not least if they help to reduce trafficking, although that is often connected to migration rather than a need to seek sanctuary.
However, the nature of the fear of persecution means that people do not always flee 'neatly' through regulated channels with the appropriate documents.
However, the nature of the fear of persecution means that people do not always flee 'neatly' through regulated channels with the appropriate documents.
The intention to develop high quality protection regimes in conjunction with receiving countries is to be welcomed but should not become a means to enhance border control with the intent of preventing people moving on or a way of abdicating our own protection responsibilities.
The intention to develop high quality protection regimes in conjunction with receiving countries is to be welcomed but should not become a means to enhance border control with the intent of preventing people moving on or a way of abdicating our own protection responsibilities.
The aim must be, in full partnership, to improve the conditions of both those seeking sanctuary and those giving it, in order to avoid additional tensions in countries which are often poor and themselves have unstable governments.
The aim must be, in full partnership, to improve the conditions of both those seeking sanctuary and those giving it, in order to avoid additional tensions in countries which are often poor and themselves have unstable governments.
This is an ambitious but necessary goal.
This is an ambitious but necessary goal.
Such an approach will require increased resources for the UNCHR, which is playing a key role in this process.
Such an approach will require increased resources for the UNCHR, which is playing a key role in this process.