natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the explanatory memorandum on the Commission proposal, one of the main reasons for drawing up the new regulation, bearing in mind that more and more claims are appearing on food labels, is that there are no specific Community provisions.
According to the explanatory memorandum on the Commission proposal, one of the main reasons for drawing up the new regulation, bearing in mind that more and more claims are appearing on food labels, is that there are no specific Community provisions.
Indeed, it is pointless to regulate what is already regulated, and the above amendment is likewise designed to ensure that this will not happen.
Indeed, it is pointless to regulate what is already regulated, and the above amendment is likewise designed to ensure that this will not happen.
Wine in particular is already subject to specific Community legislation that prohibits nutrition and health claims in the labelling and presentation of the product and regulates advertising thereof.
Wine in particular is already subject to specific Community legislation that prohibits nutrition and health claims in the labelling and presentation of the product and regulates advertising thereof.
The individual acts concerned are Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002, which lays down rules governing the labelling and presentation of wine sector products.
The individual acts concerned are Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002, which lays down rules governing the labelling and presentation of wine sector products.
In addition, Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 94/2002 impose strict limits on information and promotion actions for wine on the internal market.
In addition, Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 94/2002 impose strict limits on information and promotion actions for wine on the internal market.
This specific Community legislation protects, and makes for transparency on, the market and allows wine to move freely within it; in so doing, it effectively fulfils the aims of the proposed new regulation, namely to achieve a high degree of consumer protection, enable products to move more freely within the internal market, increase legal certainty for those involved in business activity, guarantee fair competition, and foster and safeguard innovation related to the foods covered by the legislation.
This specific Community legislation protects, and makes for transparency on, the market and allows wine to move freely within it; in so doing, it effectively fulfils the aims of the proposed new regulation, namely to achieve a high degree of consumer protection, enable products to move more freely within the internal market, increase legal certainty for those involved in business activity, guarantee fair competition, and foster and safeguard innovation related to the foods covered by the legislation.
Artikli 2 lõike 2 punkt 6
Article 2, paragraph 2, point 6
6) "haiguse ohu vähenemise väide" tähendab mis tahes tervisealast väidet, mis kinnitab, vihjab või annab mõista, et toidukategooria, toiduaine või mõne selle komponendi tarbimine vähendab oluliselt mõnda haigusesse haigestumise mõnda ohutegurit;
(6) “reduction of disease risk claim” means any health claim that states, suggests or implies that the consumption of a food category, a food or one of its constituents significantly reduces a risk factor in the development of a human disease;
6) "haiguse ohu vähenemise väide" tähendab mis tahes tervisealast väidet, mis kinnitab, vihjab või annab mõista, et toidukategooria, toiduaine või mõne selle komponendi tarbimine vähendab oluliselt mõnda haigusesse haigestumise ohtu;
(6) “reduction of disease risk claim” means any health claim that states, suggests or implies that the consumption of a food category, a food or one of its constituents significantly reduces the risk of the development of a human disease;
Since the claims are intended to be understood by consumers, the definition must refer to the reduction of a risk and not of a risk factor .
Since the claims are intended to be understood by consumers, the definition must refer to the reduction of a risk and not of a risk factor .
For instance, a claim about the reduction of the risk of a disease (e.g. 'may reduce the risk of a coronary/circulatory disorder') will be easier to understand than a claim about the reduction of a risk factor relating to that disorder (e.g. 'may reduce the level of homocystein').
For instance, a claim about the reduction of the risk of a disease (e.g. 'may reduce the risk of a coronary/circulatory disorder') will be easier to understand than a claim about the reduction of a risk factor relating to that disorder (e.g. 'may reduce the level of homocystein').
8 a) „toiduainete kategooria“ tähendab samaväärsete omaduste ja kasutusega toiduainete gruppi.
(8a) “category of foods” means a group of food products with equivalent properties and uses.
Käesoleva määruse kohaldamisalasse kuuluvaid toitumis- ja tervisealaseid väiteid ei suunata ainult või peamiselt lastele.
Nutrition and health claims falling within the scope of this Regulation shall not be directed exclusively or primarily at children.
Children can't judge themselves whether nutrition and health claims are reasonable or not and therefore they shouldn't be exploited in commercial practices.
Children can't judge themselves whether nutrition and health claims are reasonable or not and therefore they shouldn't be exploited in commercial practices.
Toitumis- ja tervisealaste väidete kasutamine on lubatud ainult siis, kui on täidetud järgmised tingimused:
The use of nutrition and health claims shall only be permitted if the following conditions are fulfilled:
a) tõestatakse üldtunnustatud teaduslike andmete põhjal, et selle aine olemasolul, mille kohta väide käib, või selle puudumisel või vähendatud sisaldusel on positiivne toitumis- või füsioloogiline mõju;
(a) the presence, absence or reduced content of the substance in respect of which the claim is made has been shown to have a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect, as established by generally accepted scientific data ;
a) tõestatakse üldtunnustatud teaduslike leidude põhjal, et selle toitaine või muu aine olemasolul, mille kohta väide käib, või selle puudumisel või vähendatud sisaldusel on positiivne toitumis- või füsioloogiline mõju; kui väide avaldatakse toiduaine või toidukategooria kohta, tuleb üldtunnustatud teaduslike leidude abil tõestada, et antud toiduainel või toiduainete kategoorial on positiivne toitumis- või füsioloogiline mõju;
(a) the presence, absence or reduced content of a nutrient or other substance in respect of which the claim is made has been shown to have a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect, as established by generally accepted scientific findings ; if a claim is made about a food or a food category, the food or food category must be shown to have a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect, as established by generally accepted scientific findings;
i) sisaldub lõpptootes ühenduse õigusaktides määratletud olulises koguses või kui sellised eeskirjad puuduvad, siis koguses, millega kaasneb toiteväärtuslik või füsioloogiline mõju, mida kinnitavad üldtunnustatud teaduslikud andmed; või
(i) is contained in the final product in a significant quantity as defined in Community legislation or, where such rules do not exist, in a quantity that will produce the nutritional or physiological effect claimed as established by generally accepted scientific data; or
i) sisaldub lõpptootes ühenduse õigusaktides määratletud olulises koguses või kui sellised eeskirjad puuduvad, siis koguses, millega kaasneb toiteväärtuslik või füsioloogiline mõju,
(i) is contained in the final product in a significant quantity as defined in Community legislation or, where such rules do not exist, in a quantity that will produce the nutritional or physiological effect
mida kinnitavad üldtunnustatud teaduslikud andmed; või
claimed as established by generally accepted scientific data; or
i i) ei esine või esineb vähendatud koguses, millega kaasneb toiteväärtuslik või füsioloogiline mõju, mida kinnitavad üldtunnustatud teaduslikud andmed;
(ii) is not present or is present in a reduced quantity that will produce the nutritional or physiological effect claimed as established by generally accepted scientific data;
e) vastab olenevalt kas III peatükis või IV peatükis esitatud eritingimustele.
(e) compliance with the specific conditions set out in Chapter III or Chapter IV as appropriate.
The general conditions set out in Article 5 for the use of claims go too far.
The general conditions set out in Article 5 for the use of claims go too far.
Claims such as 'fruit or vegetables are healthy' would be prohibited in future, because fruit and vegetables are not substances within the meaning of Article 5.
Claims such as 'fruit or vegetables are healthy' would be prohibited in future, because fruit and vegetables are not substances within the meaning of Article 5.
Paragraph 1(a) should therefore be expanded to cover claims relating to foods or food categories.
Paragraph 1(a) should therefore be expanded to cover claims relating to foods or food categories.
Toitumis- ja tervisealased väited põhinevad ja on tõestatud üldtunnustatud teaduslike teadmistega või, kui see on põhjendatud tootekategooriaga, traditsioonilisest kasutusest saadud andmetega.
1.Nutrition and health claims shall be based on and substantiated by generally recognised scientific knowledge or, if justified by the category of products, the data derived from their traditional use.
Tõestuse tase vastab esitatud väidete olemusele.
The level of substantiation shall be commensurate with the nature of the claims made.
Juhised ettevõtjate esitatava tõestuse olemuse ja kontrollväärtuste kohta sellise tõestuse hindamiseks ameti poolt kehtestab viimane hiljemalt käesoleva määruse avaldamise kuupäevale järgneva kuu esimesel päeval.
Guidelines concerning the nature of the substantiation to be provided by operators and the reference values for the Authority's assessment of such substantiation shall be established by the latter by the first day of the month following the date of publication of this Regulation at the latest.
Justification (for paragraph (1))
Justification (for paragraph (1))
The evaluation of scientific findings is subject to constant change, and is not always uniform.
The evaluation of scientific findings is subject to constant change, and is not always uniform.
Against this background, generally recognised findings should be the yardstick for the purposes of authorisation.
Against this background, generally recognised findings should be the yardstick for the purposes of authorisation.
When it comes to substantiating claims, a system based solely on scientific data is not suitable for agricultural products such as herbal products.
When it comes to substantiating claims, a system based solely on scientific data is not suitable for agricultural products such as herbal products.
Knowledge derived from experience and tradition should also be taken into account.
Knowledge derived from experience and tradition should also be taken into account.
This point was recently accepted in the case of traditional herbal medicinal products (Directive 2004/24/EC), for which a special simplified registration procedure has been established which exempts them from the requirement to prove their clinical efficacy, in so far as the efficacy of the medicinal product is plausible on the basis of long-standing use and experience.
This point was recently accepted in the case of traditional herbal medicinal products (Directive 2004/24/EC), for which a special simplified registration procedure has been established which exempts them from the requirement to prove their clinical efficacy, in so far as the efficacy of the medicinal product is plausible on the basis of long-standing use and experience.
Similarly, for traditional herbal extracts, the AFSFA (French food safety agency) proposes that the beneficial effects of products be substantiated on the basis of 'a body of knowledge established on the basis of data derived from traditional use'*.
Similarly, for traditional herbal extracts, the AFSFA (French food safety agency) proposes that the beneficial effects of products be substantiated on the basis of 'a body of knowledge established on the basis of data derived from traditional use'*.
Moreover, it is important to establish that the principle of proportionality should also apply to the level of substantiation to be provided for claims about products.
Moreover, it is important to establish that the principle of proportionality should also apply to the level of substantiation to be provided for claims about products.
Otherwise, the cost of such substantiation would quickly become prohibitive and beyond the possibilities of the great majority of SMEs.
Otherwise, the cost of such substantiation would quickly become prohibitive and beyond the possibilities of the great majority of SMEs.
Finally, to meet the essential requirements of legal certainty and to safeguard consumers' rights, it is essential to ensure total transparency in relation to the nature of the substantiation required by the European Food Safety Authority and the methods that authority uses to assess such substantiation.
Finally, to meet the essential requirements of legal certainty and to safeguard consumers' rights, it is essential to ensure total transparency in relation to the nature of the substantiation required by the European Food Safety Authority and the methods that authority uses to assess such substantiation.
* "Démarche d'évaluation de la sécurité, de l'intérêt et de l'allégation des denrées alimentaires, contenant des plantes, destinées à l'alimentation humaine" - February 2003 - AFSSA http://www.afssa.fr
* "Démarche d'évaluation de la sécurité, de l'intérêt et de l'allégation des denrées alimentaires, contenant des plantes, destinées à l'alimentation humaine" - February 2003 - AFSSA http://www.afssa.fr
Justification (for paragraph (1a)):
Justification (for paragraph (1a)):
Account must be taken of the principle of proportionality, which consists in 'checking the accuracy or truthfulness of the claims made for the product on the basis of the proof provided by the manufacturer.
Account must be taken of the principle of proportionality, which consists in 'checking the accuracy or truthfulness of the claims made for the product on the basis of the proof provided by the manufacturer.
The assessment is based on the principle of proportionality between the extent of the proof required and the impact of the effect claimed, in other words the significance of the impact of the product, or of the constituent for which the claim is made, on the consumer's physiology and the significance of its health consequences'**.
The assessment is based on the principle of proportionality between the extent of the proof required and the impact of the effect claimed, in other words the significance of the impact of the product, or of the constituent for which the claim is made, on the consumer's physiology and the significance of its health consequences'**.
Liikmesriigi pädevad ametiasutused võivad kohustada toodet turustavat toiduainetootjat või isikut esitama teadustöid ja andmeid, mis tõestavad vastavust käesolevale määrusele.
The competent authorities of the Member States may request a food business operator or a person placing a product on the market to produce the scientific work and the data establishing compliance with this Regulation.
The proposed abandonment of the authorisation procedure invalidates this provision, too.
The proposed abandonment of the authorisation procedure invalidates this provision, too.
Ilma et see piiraks direktiivi 84/450/EMÜ kohaldamist, esitatakse toitumisalane väide, milles võrreldakse toitaine kogust ja/või toiduaine energiasisaldust muu toiduainega , ainult siis, kui keskmine tarbija tunneb võrreldavad toiduained hõlpsasti ära või kui need on selgelt märgitud.
Without prejudice to Directive 84/450/EEC, a nutrition claim which compares the quantity of a nutrient and/or the energy value of a food with another food shall only be made if the foods being compared are easily identified by the average consumer or clearly indicated.
Comparisons should not be limited just to foods of the same category.
Comparisons should not be limited just to foods of the same category.
Instead, in the interests of improved information it should also be possible to compare different foods, such as a comparison between the calcium content of a glass of milk and that of a glass of orange juice.
Instead, in the interests of improved information it should also be possible to compare different foods, such as a comparison between the calcium content of a glass of milk and that of a glass of orange juice.
Tervisealaseid väiteid tohib esitada, välja arvatud juhul , kui need ei vasta II peatüki üldistele nõuetele ja käesoleva peatüki erinõuetele.
Health claims shall be permitted unless they do not comply with the general requirements in Chapter II and the specific requirements in this Chapter.
Article 10(1) lays down a general ban on health claims, subject to the possibility of authorisation.
Article 10(1) lays down a general ban on health claims, subject to the possibility of authorisation.
Accordingly, health claims may only be used if they have been authorised pursuant to the provisions of the regulation.
Accordingly, health claims may only be used if they have been authorised pursuant to the provisions of the regulation.
However, this ban goes too far, since it also covers recognised and scientifically proven claims which do not mislead consumers.
However, this ban goes too far, since it also covers recognised and scientifically proven claims which do not mislead consumers.
Moreover, the authorisation procedure envisaged is bureaucratic, impractical and, especially in the light of the Lisbon strategy, unacceptable.
Moreover, the authorisation procedure envisaged is bureaucratic, impractical and, especially in the light of the Lisbon strategy, unacceptable.
The prior assessment procedure should therefore be totally abandoned.
The prior assessment procedure should therefore be totally abandoned.
Since a registration procedure evaluating the scientific substantiation is foreseen for all health claims, specific prohibitions no longer have to be expressly laid down.
Since a registration procedure evaluating the scientific substantiation is foreseen for all health claims, specific prohibitions no longer have to be expressly laid down.
All claims that are scientifically substantiated should be allowed.
All claims that are scientifically substantiated should be allowed.
b) väited, mis puudutavad psühholoogilisi ja käitumisfunktsioone;
(b)claims which make reference to psychological and behavioural functions;
A virtually exhaustive list of prohibited implicit health claims is a disproportionate measure.
A virtually exhaustive list of prohibited implicit health claims is a disproportionate measure.
Publicity indications on products must not be banned.
Publicity indications on products must not be banned.
This would effectively make the advertising of food products impossible.
This would effectively make the advertising of food products impossible.
There is other legislation intended to protect the consumer against genuinely misleading publicity.
There is other legislation intended to protect the consumer against genuinely misleading publicity.
Tervisealased väited, mis kirjeldavad toitaine või mõne muu aine üldtunnustatud tähtsust
Health claims describing a generally accepted role of a nutrient or other substance
Erandina artikli 10 lõikest 1 tohib esitada tervisealaseid väiteid, mis kirjeldavad toitaine või mõne muu aine tähtsust kasvamisele, arengule ja organismi normaalsetele füsioloogilistele funktsioonidele, kui need põhinevad juurdunud ja vaieldamatutel teaduslikel andmetel, on keskmisele tarbijale hästi mõistetavad ning kuuluvad lõikes 2 ettenähtud nimekirja.
By way of derogation from Article 10 (1), health claims describing the role of a nutrient or of another substance in growth, development and the normal functions of the body, which are based on generally accepted scientific data and well understood by the average consumer, may be made if they are included in the list provided for in paragraph 2.
Pärast ametiga konsulteerimist võetakse vastavalt artikli 23 menetlusele … [kolm aastat pärast antud määruse vastuvõtmise kuu viimast päeva] vastu ühenduse lubatud väidete nimekiri vastavalt lõikele 1, mis kirjeldab toitaine või mõne teise aine tähtsust kasvamisele, arengule ja organismi normaalsetele füsioloogilistele funktsioonidele.
After consulting the Authority, the Commission shall adopt, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23, a Community list of permitted claims as referred to in paragraph 1, describing the role of a nutrient or other substance in growth, development and normal functions of the body by … at the latest [last day of the month of adoption of this Regulation + 3 years].
Antud nimekirja muudatusettepaneku võtab komisjon vastu oma initsiatiivil või mõne liikmesriigi taotluse põhjal vastavalt artiklile 23.
Modifications to the list shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23, on the Commission's own initiative or following a request by a Member State.
Alates käesoleva määruse jõustumise kuupäevast võivad toiduainetootjad kuni lõikes 2 nimetatud nimekirja vastuvõtmiseni esitada enda vastutusel lõikes 1 nimetatud tervisealaseid väiteid, kui need vastavad käesolevale määrusele ja nende suhtes kehtivatele siseriiklikele eeskirjadele ning ei lähe vastuollu artiklis 22 viidatud kaitsemeetmetega.
From the date of entry into force of this Regulation until the adoption of the list referred to in the second paragraph of paragraph 2, health claims as referred to in paragraph 1 may be made under the responsibility of business operators provided that they are in accordance with this Regulation and with existing national provisions applicable to them, and without prejudice to the adoption of safeguard measures as referred to in Article 22.
The proposed abandonment of the general ban on health claims plus authorisation procedure envisaged in Article 10(1) makes this article meaningless, and it should therefore likewise be deleted.
The proposed abandonment of the general ban on health claims plus authorisation procedure envisaged in Article 10(1) makes this article meaningless, and it should therefore likewise be deleted.
Erandina direktiivi 2000/13/EÜ artikli 2 lõikest 1 tohib esitada haiguse ohu vähenemise väiteid, kui see on vastavalt käesolevale määrusele lubatud.
By way of derogation from Article 2 (1) of Directive 2000/13/EC, reduction of disease risk claims may be made where they are permitted under with this Regulation.
The proposed abandonment of the general ban on health claims plus authorisation procedure envisaged in Article 10(1) means that this article should be amended accordingly.
The proposed abandonment of the general ban on health claims plus authorisation procedure envisaged in Article 10(1) means that this article should be amended accordingly.
Artikli 10 lõikes 1 nimetatud loa saamiseks tuleb ametile esitada taotlus.
To obtain the authorisation referred to in Article 10 (1), an application shall be submitted to the Authority.
Kinnituses on märgitud laekumise kuupäev;
The acknowledgement shall state the date of receipt of the application;
a) taotleja nimi ja aadress;
(a) the name and address of the applicant;