natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Artikli 5 punkt a
Article 5, point (a)
a) ühtse põllumajanduspoliitika analüüsiks, halduseks, jälgimiseks, infovahetuseks ning rakendamiseks vajalikud tegevused ning kontrollsüsteemide ja tehnilise ning haldustoe rakendamisega seotud tegevused;
(a) measures required for the analysis, management, monitoring, information exchange and implementation of the common agricultural policy, as well as measures relating to the implementation of control systems and technical and administrative assistance;
a) ühtse põllumajanduspoliitika analüüsiks, halduseks, jälgimiseks, infovahetuseks ning rakendamiseks vajalikud meetmed ning kontrollsüsteemide ja tehnilise ning haldustoe rakendamisega seotud tegevused , välja arvatud kulutused, mis artikli 13 kohaselt ei ole EAGGFi kanda;
(a) measures required for the analysis, management, monitoring, information exchange and implementation of the common agricultural policy, as well as measures relating to the implementation of control systems and technical and administrative assistance , with the exception of expenditure that, pursuant to Article 13, is not to be borne by the EAGF ;
Durch die Ausdehnung der technischen Hilfe werden Gemeinschaftsmittel für den eigentlichen Zweck der Fonds, die Förderung von Landwirtschaft und Landentwicklung, abgezogen.
Extending technical assistance will reduce the amount of Community money available for fulfilling the actual purpose of the Funds, namely to promote agriculture and rural development.
Eine Finanzierung sollte deshalb nur soweit erfolgen, als Artikel 13 gewahrt wird, der festlegt, dass Aufwendungen der Mitgliedstaaten und der Begünstigten für Verwaltungs- und Personalkosten vom EGFL nicht getragen werden, vorbehaltlich der nach dem Verfahren von Artikel 41, Absatz 2 vorgesehenen Ausnahmen.
Financing should therefore only be provided in so far as Article 13, which lays down that expenditure relating to administrative and personnel costs incurred by Member States and beneficiaries of aid from the EAGF shall not be borne by the Fund, except where provided for under the procedure referred to in Article 41(2), is complied with.
Igal juhul ei tohi otsemaksete sooritamine toimuda hiljem kui vastava eelarveaasta 15. oktoobril.
However, direct payments shall under no circumstances be made after 15 October of the budget year concerned.
Die Regelung muss einen gewissen Spielraum für besondere Ausnahmefälle zulassen, die sich insbesondere durch die Umstellung auf das neue System der Betriebsprämie ergeben könnten.
A certain amount of scope must be allowed for exceptional cases, which could arise in particular as a result of the switch to the new farm payments system.
Artikli 31 lõike 4 punkt a
Article 31, paragraph 4, point (a)
a) artikli 3 lõikes 1 sätestatud kulutusi, mis teostati enam kui 36 kuud enne komisjoni kirjalikku teadet asjaomasele liikmesriigile kontrolli tulemuste kohta;
(a) expenditure as indicated in Article 3(1) that is incurred more than thirty-six months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings;
a) artikli 3 lõikes 1 sätestatud kulutusi, mis teostati enam kui 24 kuud enne komisjoni kirjalikku teadet asjaomasele liikmesriigile kontrolli tulemuste kohta;
(a) expenditure as indicated in Article 3(1) that is incurred more than twenty-four months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings;
Verordnung EWG Nr. 1258/1999 – die derzeit gültig ist – sieht eine Frist von 24 Monaten vor, die zweckmäßigerweise auch eingehalten werden sollte.
Regulation (EC) 1258/1999 which is in force today provides for 24 months, which should be retained.
Artikli 31 lõike 4 punkt b
Article 31, paragraph 4, point (b)
b) mitmeaastaseid meetmeid puudutavaid kulutusi, mis on osa artikli 3 lõikes 1 sätestatud kulutustest, mille puhul viimane kohustus kasusaajale tekkis enam kui 36 kuud enne komisjoni kirjalikku teadet asjaomasele liikmesriigile kontrolli tulemuste kohta;
(b) expenditure on multiannual measures falling within the scope of Article 3(1) where the final obligation on the recipient occurs more than thirty-six months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings;
b) mitmeaastaseid meetmeid puudutavaid kulutusi, mis on osa artikli 3 lõikes 1 sätestatud kulutustest, mille puhul viimane kohustus kasusaajale tekkis enam kui 24 kuud enne komisjoni kirjalikku teadet asjaomasele liikmesriigile kontrolli tulemuste kohta;
(b) expenditure on multiannual measures falling within the scope of Article 3(1) where the final obligation on the recipient occurs more than twenty-four months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings;
Artikli 31 lõige 4 punkt c
Article 31, paragraph 4, point (c)
c) artiklis 4 sätestatud programme puudutavaid kulutusi, mille lõppmakse teostati enam kui 36 kuud enne komisjoni kirjalikku teadet asjaomasele liikmesriigile kontrolli tulemuste kohta.
(c) expenditure on programmes, as indicated in Article 4, payment of the balance of which is made more than thirty-six months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings.
c) artiklis 4 sätestatud programme puudutavaid kulutusi, mille lõppmakse teostati enam kui 24 kuud enne komisjoni kirjalikku teadet asjaomasele liikmesriigile kontrolli tulemuste kohta.
(c) expenditure on programmes, as indicated in Article 4, payment of the balance of which is made more than twenty-four months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings.
Artikli 32 lõike 5 esimene lõik
Article 32, paragraph 5
Kui tagasinõudmine ei ole toimunud nelja aasta jooksul alates esmakordsest administratiivsest või kohtulikust tuvastamisest, või kuue aasta jooksul, kui tagasinõudmine toimub riikliku kohtu kaudu , kantakse tagasinõudmata jätmise rahalised tagajärjed pärast lõikes 2 sätestatud kinnipidamise rakendamist 50% ulatuses asjaomase liikmesriigi ja 50% ulatuses ühenduse eelarvest.
If recovery has not taken place within four years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within six years where recovery action is taken in the national courts, 50% of the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50% by the Community budget, after application of the deduction provided for in paragraph 2.
Kui tagasinõudmine ei ole toimunud nelja aasta jooksul alates esmakordsest administratiivsest tuvastamisest, või kuue kuu jooksul pärast lõpliku kohtuotsuse teatavakstegemist, kantakse tagasinõudmata jätmise rahalised tagajärjed pärast lõikes 2 sätestatud kinnipidamise rakendamist 50% ulatuses asjaomase liikmesriigi ja 50% ulatuses ühenduse eelarvest.
If recovery has not taken place within four years of the primary administrative finding, or within six months after the issue of the final judicial decision, 50% of the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50% by the Community budget, after application of the deduction provided for in paragraph 2.
Artikkel 43:
Article 43
Enne igale eelarveaastale järgneva aasta esimest septembrit koostab komisjon finantsaruande FEAGA ja FEADER’i juhtimisest möödunud eelarveaasta jooksul
By 1 September of each year following the budget year, the Commission shall draw up a financial report on the administration of the EAGF and the EAFRD during the previous financial year.
Enne igale eelarveaastale järgneva aasta esimest septembrit esitab komisjon Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule finantsaruande FEAGA ja FEADER’i juhtimisest möödunud eelarveaasta jooksul
By 1 September of each year following the budget year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a financial report on the administration of the EAGF and the EAFRD during the previous financial year
Art. 32 und 33 des Entwurfs sehen besondere Bestimmungen für den EGFL bei Unregelmäßigkeiten oder Versäumnissen bei der Wiedereinziehung von Beträgen vor.
Articles 32 and 33 of the proposal for a regulation lay down provisions specific to the EAGF in connection with recovering sums in the event of irregularities or negligence.
Diese Fristen sind zu kurz bemessen.
These periods are too short.
EELARVEKONTROLLIKOMISJONI ARVAMUS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL
põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjonile
for the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
nõukogu määruse ettepaneku kohta ühtse põllumajanduspoliitika rahastamiseks
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the financing of the common agricultural policy
On 2 February 2005 the draftsman submitted his draft opinion for the Temporary Committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary means 2007-2013 (FINP) to CONT.
On 2 February 2005 the draftsman submitted his draft opinion for the Temporary Committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary means 2007-2013 (FINP) to CONT.
There he outlined horizontal items of concern for budgetary control, which apply for the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013 as a whole.
There he outlined horizontal items of concern for budgetary control, which apply for the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013 as a whole.
The draft opinion at issue is concerning the concrete legislative Commission proposal on the financing of the common agricultural policy for the period 2007-2013.
The draft opinion at issue is concerning the concrete legislative Commission proposal on the financing of the common agricultural policy for the period 2007-2013.
The proposal's overall aim is to simplify the financial instruments in agriculture.
The proposal's overall aim is to simplify the financial instruments in agriculture.
In addition, it seeks to strengthen control structures at Member State level.
In addition, it seeks to strengthen control structures at Member State level.
Finally, modifications to the recovery mechanism are addressed.
Finally, modifications to the recovery mechanism are addressed.
The draftsman supports the idea of an annual disclosure statement by Member States' highest level political and managing authorities.
The draftsman supports the idea of an annual disclosure statement by Member States' highest level political and managing authorities.
This instrument for strengthening Member States' responsibility for EU funds was introduced in CONT's agenda via the 2003 draft Commission discharge report.
This instrument for strengthening Member States' responsibility for EU funds was introduced in CONT's agenda via the 2003 draft Commission discharge report.
It is being further developed through CONT's draft opinion for FINP.
It is being further developed through CONT's draft opinion for FINP.
The draftsman holds the view that this concept will only take effect when transposed into the concrete legislative proposals for the period 2007-2013.
The draftsman holds the view that this concept will only take effect when transposed into the concrete legislative proposals for the period 2007-2013.
He welcomes first signs from the Commission in this direction.
He welcomes first signs from the Commission in this direction.
The proposal contains the introduction of a declaration of assurance signed by the head of the paying agencies.
The proposal contains the introduction of a declaration of assurance signed by the head of the paying agencies.
In addition, the draftsman suggests to further improve the Commission's monitoring of the paying agencies: The example of the Commission's monitoring of paying agencies in the "new" Member States should also be applied in the "old" Member States.
In addition, the draftsman suggests to further improve the Commission's monitoring of the paying agencies: The example of the Commission's monitoring of paying agencies in the "new" Member States should also be applied in the "old" Member States.
As regards the new recovery mechanism, the draftsman considers the proposal to be a step forward for two reasons.
As regards the new recovery mechanism, the draftsman considers the proposal to be a step forward for two reasons.
The proposal introduces a general rule of equal burden-sharing in case of non-recovery: 50 % for the EC budget and 50 % for the budget of the Member State concerned.
The proposal introduces a general rule of equal burden-sharing in case of non-recovery: 50 % for the EC budget and 50 % for the budget of the Member State concerned.
The proposal also tightens the deadlines for recovery by Member States (4 years or 6 years in case of court action respectively).
The proposal also tightens the deadlines for recovery by Member States (4 years or 6 years in case of court action respectively).
However, the proposal still enables Member States to profit from delaying recovery for the following reasons: It foresees that, if recovery is successful after the 4/6 years' deadlines have expired, the Member State can keep 50% of the amounts recovered.
However, the proposal still enables Member States to profit from delaying recovery for the following reasons: It foresees that, if recovery is successful after the 4/6 years' deadlines have expired, the Member State can keep 50% of the amounts recovered.
If the Member State concerned can prove the absence of irregularity by a definitive administrative or court decision it may even keep 100% of the amounts recovered successfully, but late.
If the Member State concerned can prove the absence of irregularity by a definitive administrative or court decision it may even keep 100% of the amounts recovered successfully, but late.
Eelarvekontrollikomisjon palub vastutaval põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu komisjonil lisada oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud.
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the Committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report.
Artikli 6 lõige 4 a (uus)
Article 6, paragraph 4 a (new)
Juhul kui akrediteeritud makseasutus ei vasta või enam ei vasta ühele või enamale lõikes 1 sätestatud tingimusele, võib komisjon akrediteeringu tühistada, välja arvatud juhul, kui asjaomane liikmesriik täidab oma lõikes 4 sätestatud kohustuse.
Where an accredited paying agency does not meet or no longer meets one or more of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, the Commission may withdraw accreditation unless the Member State concerned complies with its obligation as set out in paragraph 4.
Artikli 9 lõike 1 esimene lõik a (uus)
Article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Ilma et see piiraks ülaltoodud kohustuste kohaldamist, peab iga liikmesriik enne ühendusepoolse toetuse saamist aastal N ja kord aastas koostama eelneva avalikustamisaruande, milles avaldatakse, et ühenduse õigusaktidega nõutud finantskontrollisüsteemid on loodud ja toimivad.
Without prejudice to the abovementioned obligations, each Member State shall issue, prior to receiving Community funding in year N and on an annual basis, an ex ante disclosure statement declaring that the financial control structures required by Community law are in place and functioning.
Avalikustamisaruande peab allkirjastama liikmesriigi kõrgeima taseme poliitiline ja haldusasutus (rahandusminister).
The disclosure statement shall be signed by the Member State's highest level political and managing authority (finance minister).
Artikli 32 lõike 5 kolmas lõige
Article 32, paragraph 5, subparagraph 3
Kooskõlas esimese lõiguga ei piira sissenõudmise puudumisest tulenev finantskohustuse jagamine asjaomase liikmesriigi kohustust viia läbi sissenõudmisprotseduurid, vastavalt käesoleva määruse artikli 9 lõikele 1.
The distribution of the financial burden of non-recovery in line with the first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the requirement that the Member State concerned must pursue recovery procedures in compliance with Article 9(1) of this Regulation.
N ii kogutud summad kantakse 50% ulatuses FEAGA arvele.
50% of the amounts recovered in this way shall be credited to the EAGF.
Nii kogutud summad kantakse FEAGA arvele.
The amounts recovered in this way shall be credited to the EAGF.
Artikkel 43
Article 43
Enne igale eelarveaastale järgneva aasta esimest septembrit koostab komisjon finantsaruande FEAGA ja FEADER’i juhtimisest möödunud eelarveaasta jooksul.
By 1 September of each year following the budget year, the Commission shall draw up a financial report on the administration of the EAGF and the EAFRD during the previous financial year.
Enne igale eelarveaastale järgneva aasta esimest septembrit esitab komisjon Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule finantsaruande FEAGA ja FEADER’i juhtimisest möödunud eelarveaasta jooksul.
By 1 September of each year following the budget year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a financial report on the administration of the EAGF and the EAFRD during the previous financial year
ettepanek nõukogu määruse ettepaneku kohta ühtse põllumajanduspoliitika rahastamiseks
Proposal for a Council regulation on the financing of the common agricultural policy
Inés Ayala Sender, Herbert Bösch, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Petr Duchoň, Szabolcs Fazakas, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ona Juknevičiene, Nils Lundgren, Hans-Peter Martin, Edith Mastenbroek, Véronique Mathieu, Jan Mulder, István Pálfi, Margarita Starkevičiute, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Inés Ayala Sender, Herbert Bösch, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Petr Duchoň, Szabolcs Fazakas, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ona Juknevičienė, Nils Lundgren, Hans-Peter Martin, Edith Mastenbroek, Véronique Mathieu, Jan Mulder, István Pálfi, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek ühise põllumajanduspoliitika rahastamise kohta
Proposal for a Council regulation on the financing of the common agricultural policy
art 37 lg 2 (EÜ)
Article 37(2) EC
Arvamuse esitamisest loobumine otsuse kuupäev
Not delivering opinions Date of decision
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu ettepanek võtta vastu määrus toidu toitumis- ja tervisealaste väidete kohta
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods
Alexander Stubb , siseturu- ja tarbijakaitsekomisjon
Alexander Stubb , Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
PE 353.302v03-00
PE 353.302v04-00
TÖÖSTUSE, TEADUSUURINGUTE JA ENERGEETIKAKOMISJONI ARVAMUS............39
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............40
SISETURU– JA TARBIJAKAITSEKOMISJONI arvamus ................................................76
OPINION of the COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION 79
– võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule (KOM(2003)0424)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2003)0424)
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 251 lõiget 2 ja artiklit 95, vastavalt millele komisjon parlamendile ettepaneku esitas (C5‑0329/2003);
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5‑0329/2003),
– võttes arvesse keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjoni raportit ning tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjoni ja siseturu- ja tarbijakaitsekomisjoni arvamusi (A6–0128/2005);
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6‑0128/2005),
Põhjendus -1 a (uus)
Recital -1 a (new)
- 1 a) Mitmekesine, tasakaalustatud toitumine on hea tervise eeltingimus.
(- 1a) A varied, balanced diet is a prerequisite for good health.
Üksikute toodete tähtsus võrreldes toitumise kui tervikuga on suhteline ja toitumine on ainult üks paljudest teguritest, mis mõjutavad teatavate haiguste tekkimist inimesel.
Products taken separately are only of relative importance compared to diet as a whole and diet is only one among many factors which influence the development of certain diseases in humans.
Inimhaiguste põhjustamisel on oma osa ka sellistel muudel teguritel nagu vanus, geneetiline eelsoodumus, kehalise aktiivsuse tase, tubaka ja muude ainete kasutamine, keskkonnamõjud ja stress.
Other factors such as age, genetic predisposition, the level of physical activity, use of tobacco and other drugs, environmental exposure and stress can also play a role in triggering human diseases.
Euroopa Liit peab tervisealaste soovituste koostamisel võtma arvesse kõiki neid tegureid.
These factors must all be taken into account in the recommendations drawn up by the European Union in the area of health.
The legislative text should begin with this reminder.
The legislative text should begin with this reminder.
3 a) Käesolevat määrust ei kohaldata lihtteadetele, ükskõik, kas need on tervisekaitseasutuste kampaaniate kommertsteadaannetes või mitte, mis kutsuvad üles teatavate toiduainete tervislikule tarbimisele, näiteks puuvilja, köögivilja ja rasvase kala portsjonite soovitavad kogused.
(3a) This Regulation should not apply to simple messages, whether or not included in commercial communications, related to campaigns by public health authorities to encourage healthy eating of particular foods, for example recommended numbers of portions of fruit, vegetables and oily fish.
The Regulation should not ban communication of healthy eating messages in campaigns by national authorities and their representation in the labelling, advertising or presentation of foods.
The Regulation should not ban communication of healthy eating messages in campaigns by national authorities and their representation in the labelling, advertising or presentation of foods.
There are campaigns in Member States to promote the consumption of fruit and vegetables and oily fish, for example.
There are campaigns in Member States to promote the consumption of fruit and vegetables and oily fish, for example.
6) Toiduaineid, millele tehakse vastavate väidetega reklaami, võivad tarbijad tajuda kui tooteid, mis võrreldes sarnaste või teiste toodetega, millele niisuguseid toitaineid pole lisatud, annavad toiteväärtust puudutava, psühholoogilise või mõne muu tervist puudutava eelise.
(6) Foods promoted with claims may be perceived by consumers as having a nutritional, physiological or other health advantage over similar or other products without such nutrients added.
See võib ajendada tarbijat tegema otsuseid, mis mõjutavad otseselt tema konkreetsete toitainete või muude ainete tarbimist viisil, mis ei vasta teaduslikele soovitustele.
This may encourage consumers to make choices, which directly influence their total intake of individual nutrients or other substances in a way which would run counter to scientific advice.
Selleks, et vältida seda võimalikku soovimatut mõju, on kohane kehtestada väiteid kandvatele toodetele teatud piirangud.
To counter this potential undesirable effect, it is appropriate to impose certain restrictions as regards the products bearing claims.
Selles kontekstis on faktorid nagu teatud ainete olemasolu – nagu toote alkoholisisaldus või toote toitaineprofiil – sobiv kriteerium otsustamaks, kas toode võib väiteid kanda.
In this context, factors such as the presence of certain substances such as the alcohol content of the product or the nutrient profile of the product are appropriate criteria for determining whether the product can bear claims.
Merely asserting the 'undesirable' effect of nutrition and health claims in a recital cannot justify 'nutrient profiles' and the further bans on nutrition and health claims in the Commission proposal.
Merely asserting the 'undesirable' effect of nutrition and health claims in a recital cannot justify 'nutrient profiles' and the further bans on nutrition and health claims in the Commission proposal.
This applies in particular to the supposed justification of the total ban on nutrition and health claims in relation to beverages containing more than 1.2% by volume of alcohol.
This applies in particular to the supposed justification of the total ban on nutrition and health claims in relation to beverages containing more than 1.2% by volume of alcohol.