natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the withdrawal of preferences may be decided now not only on the basis of economic considerations, as before, but also on the basis of violations of principles laid down in the conventions listed in Annex III, the consultation with the civil society (including social partners such as Trade Unions) and the other EU institutions (including the European Parliament) is obligatory.
Since the withdrawal of preferences may be decided now not only on the basis of economic considerations, as before, but also on the basis of violations of principles laid down in the conventions listed in Annex III, the consultation with the civil society (including social partners such as Trade Unions) and the other EU institutions (including the European Parliament) is obligatory.
Muudatusettepanek 19
Amendment 19
Artikli 26 lõige 2 a (uus)
Article 26, paragraph 2 a (new)
Muudatusettepanek 20
Amendment 20
Artikli 26 lõige 2 b (uus)
Article 26, paragraph 2 b (new)
Komitee määrab mõjuhindamise uuringu sisu, mis igal juhul hõlmab vähemalt järgmisi punkte:
The Committee will set the contents of the impact-assessment study which will in any event cover at least the following points:
– võrdlusuuring üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava kasutamise määra kohta käesoleva määruse ja varasemate määruste ajal, et teha kindlaks positiivsed ja negatiivsed trendid;
- a comparative study of GSP utilisation rates under this Regulation and the previous ones, in order to identify the positive and negative trends;
– hinnang astmestamise mõjude kohta asjaomaste riikide vaesusnäitajatele;
- an evaluation of the effects of the graduation in the poverty indicators of the countries affected;
– eelhinnang (ekstrapoleerimise teel) tulevase astmestamise mõjude kohta riikidele, millele tõenäoliselt kohaldatakse astmestamist järgmise määrusega;
- a preliminary assessment (by extrapolation) of the effects of future graduation on the countries likely to be graduated in the next regulation;
– võrdlusuuring üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava ning AKV-ELi Cotonou kokkuleppe alusel AKV riikidele pakutava sooduskohtlemise kohta, eesmärgiga viia muudetavasse määrusesse sisse vajalikud muudatused, et võtta arvesse teatud AKV riikide majanduse spetsiifilisust.
- a comparative study of the preferential treatment offered by the GSP and the ACP-EU Cotonou Agreement to ACP countries, with a view to incorporating into a revised regulation those changes necessary to take into account the specificity of some ACP economies.
There are some elements that should be included in it, and they are listed here.
There are some elements that should be included in it, and they are listed here.
Muudatusettepanek 21
Amendment 21
Komitee uurib ühenduse üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava mõjusid ajavahemikku 1. juulist 2005 kuni 31. detsembrini 2008 käsitleva komisjoni aruande põhjal.
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of a report from the Commission covering the period 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2008.
Komitee uurib ühenduse üldiste tariifsete soodustuse kava mõjusid artikli 26 lõikes 2 a osutatud mõjuhindamise uuringu põhjal .
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 26(2a).
Muudatusettepanek 22
Amendment 22
Maade puhul, millel on õigus soodustustele käesoleva määruse 2. jaotises sätestatud sooduskohtlemise alusel, kuid mis ajapuudusel ei ole suutnud täita haldusmenetlusi, säilitatakse nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 2501/2001 sätted, mis sisalduvad II jao 2. ja 4. jaotises, III jao 1. ja 2. jaotises ning IV jaos.
The provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 contained in Title II, Sections 2 and 4, Title III, Sections 1 and 2 and Title IV shall be maintained for the countries that are eligible under the preferential treatment provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation but which, due to lack of time, have not been able to comply with the administrative procedures.
The objective of this amendment is to maintain the preferential treatment of the countries currently benefiting from GSP special incentives (drugs, labour rights or environment) until they are ready to comply with the heavy administrative procedure necessary to benefit from the GSP plus.
The objective of this amendment is to maintain the preferential treatment of the countries currently benefiting from GSP special incentives (drugs, labour rights or environment) until they are ready to comply with the heavy administrative procedure necessary to benefit from the GSP plus.
The Commission claims that everything will be ready by 1 July 2005.
The Commission claims that everything will be ready by 1 July 2005.
The draftsman does not have strong arguments to disbelieve the Commission, and therefore maintains the date of entry into force of the new Regulation (1 July 2005).
The draftsman does not have strong arguments to disbelieve the Commission, and therefore maintains the date of entry into force of the new Regulation (1 July 2005).
The draftsman withdraws, in consequence, his previous amendments 2, 3 and 7.
The draftsman withdraws, in consequence, his previous amendments 2, 3 and 7.
However, in order to respect the need for predictability for economic operators, the need for customs administrations to prepare themselves to apply a new system, and in order to avoid the risk of creating a dangerous legal vacuum if the previous regime is repealed by 30 June 2005 but the new regime is not yet in place, the rapporteur proposes this amendment.
However, in order to respect the need for predictability for economic operators, the need for customs administrations to prepare themselves to apply a new system, and in order to avoid the risk of creating a dangerous legal vacuum if the previous regime is repealed by 30 June 2005 but the new regime is not yet in place, the rapporteur proposes this amendment.
This new formulation of the entry into force of the current Regulation is more respectful with the WTO ruling but at the same time avoids damaging beneficiary countries and economic operators, given the high degree of predictability.
This new formulation of the entry into force of the current Regulation is more respectful with the WTO ruling but at the same time avoids damaging beneficiary countries and economic operators, given the high degree of predictability.
Muudatusettepanek 23
Amendment 23
Artikli 30 lõige 3 a (uus)
Article 30, paragraph 3 a (new)
Uues ettepanekus võetakse nõuetekohaselt arvesse artikli 26 lõikes 2 a osutatud mõjuhindamise uuringu tulemusi.
The new proposal shall duly take into consideration the results of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 26(2a).
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek üldiste tariifsete soodustuste kava kohaldamise kohta
Proposal for a Council regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences
Raportöör(id) nimetamise kuupäev
Draftsman Date appointed
Alessandro Battilocchio, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Nirj Deva, Koenraad Dillen, Alexandra Dobolyi, Fernando Fern?ndez Mart?n, Michael Gahler, Jana Hybášková, Glenys Kinnock, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Girts Valdis Kristovskis, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Luisa Morgantini, Józef Pinior, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, José Ribeiro e Castro, Toomas Savi, Frithjof Schmidt, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, María Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco, Anna Záborská, Jan Zahradil, Mauro Zani
Alessandro Battilocchio, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Nirj Deva, Koenraad Dillen, Alexandra Dobolyi, Fernando Fernández Martín, Michael Gahler, Jana Hybášková, Glenys Kinnock, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Luisa Morgantini, Józef Pinior, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, José Ribeiro e Castro, Toomas Savi, Frithjof Schmidt, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, María Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco, Anna Záborská, Jan Zahradil, Mauro Zani
EÜ art 133
Article 133 EC
Kader Arif, Enrique Barón Crespo, Françoise Castex, Giulietto Chiesa, Jan Christian Ehler, Glyn Ford, Sajjad Karim, Alain Lipietz, Caroline Lucas, Erika Mann, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Bogusław Rogalski, Tokia Saifi, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna and Zbigniew Zaleski
Kader Arif, Enrique Barón Crespo, Françoise Castex, Giulietto Chiesa, Jan Christian Ehler, Glyn Ford, Sajjad Karim, Alain Lipietz, Caroline Lucas, Erika Mann, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Bogusław Rogalski, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna and Zbigniew Zaleski
Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Antol?n S?nchez Presedo and Jonas Sjöstedt
Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Antolín Sánchez Presedo and Jonas Sjöstedt
Esitamise kuupäev – A6
Date tabled – A6-
Teadus ja tehnoloogia – Euroopa Liidu poliitika suunised teaduse toetamiseks
on Science and technology- Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research
teadus ja tehnoloogia – Euroopa Liidu teaduse toetamisega seotud poliitiliste suuniste kohta
on Science and technology - Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist "Teadus ja tehnoloogia, Euroopa tuleviku võtmed – Euroopa Liidu poliitika suunised teaduse toetamiseks" ( KOM(2004)0353 );
– having regard to the Commission's Communication “Science and technology, the key to Europe's future - Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research”( COM(2004)0353 ),
– võttes arvesse eesistuja riigi järeldusi Euroopa teadusuuringute toetamise poliitika kohta, mille kiitsid heaks suur osa konkurentsinõukogu 25.–26. novembril 2004. a koosolekul osalenud delegatsioonidest
– having regard to the Presidency's conclusions on future European policy to support research endorsed by a substantial majority of the delegations at the Competitiveness Council meeting of 25/26 November 2004
Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu, 26/11/2004 (English) – 14687/04 (Press: 323). ;
Council of the European Union, 26/11/2004 (English) – 14687/04 (Press: 323). ,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 27. juuni 2002. a otsust nr 1513/2002/EÜ teadusuuringute ja tehnoloogiaarenduse 6. raamprogrammi kohta, mis aitab kaasa Euroopa teadusruumi loomisele ja uuendustele (2002–2006)
– having regard to Decision Nº 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 June 2002 concerning the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 - 2006)
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni tegevuskava teadusuuringutesse tehtavate investeeringute suurendamiseks ( KOM(2003)0226 );
– having regard to the Commission's action plan aimed at increasing investment in research ( COM(2003)0226 ),
– võttes arvesse 18. novembri 2003. aasta resolutsiooni – teadusuuringutesse tehtavad investeeringud: Euroopa tegevuskava
– having regard to its resolution of 18 November 2003 on investing in research: an action plan for Europe
- võttes arvesse 1. aprilli 2004. a resolutsiooni rahvusvahelise taastuvenergia konverentsi (Bonn, juuni 2004) kohta
- having regard to its resolution of 1 April 2004 on the International Conference for Renewable Energies (Bonn, June 2004)
Vastuvõetud tekstid, P5_TA(2004)0276 . , milles parlament rõhutas vajadust suurendada toetust teadus- ja arendustegevusele ning innovatsioonile taastuvenergia valdkonnas ning levitada ja propageerida tulemusi kõikides ühiskonnasektorites;
Texts adopted, P5_TA(2004)0276 . , in which it stresses the need to increase support for R&D and innovation in renewable energies and to disseminate and promote the results to all sectors of society,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatisi naiste ja teaduse kohta, ülikoolide rolli kohta teadmiste Euroopas, Euroopa teadusruumi mobiilsuse kohta, Euroopa teadlaste karjääri kohta, põhiuuringute kohta, nanotehnoloogia kohta, julgeoleku-uuringute kohta ja Euroopa teadusruumi piirkondlikku mõõtme kohta ( KOM(1999)0076 , KOM(2003)0058 , KOM(2001)0331 , KOM(2003)0436 , KOM(2004)0009 , KOM(2004)0338 , KOM(2004)0590 ), KOM(2001)0549 );
– having regard to the Commission’s communications on women and science, on the role of universities in the Europe of knowledge, on a mobility strategy for the European Research Area and on the careers of European researchers, on basic research, on nanotechnology, on security research, and on the regional dimension of the European research area ( COM(1999)0076 , COM(2003)0058 , COM(2001)0331 , COM(2003)0436 , COM(2004)0009 , COM(2004)0338 , COM(2004)0590 , COM(2001)0549 ),
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist finantsperspektiivide kohta ajavahemikuks 2007–2013 ( KOM(2004)0101 , KOM(2004)0487 );
– having regard to the Commission's Communications on the Union's financial perspectives for the period 2007 – 2013 ( COM(2004)0101 , COM(2004)0487 ),
– võttes arvesse Federico Mayor'i juhitud Euroopa teadusnõukogu ekspertgrupi raportit
– having regard to the report of the European Research Council Expert Group chaired by Mr Federico Mayor
– võttes arvesse Ramon Marimoni juhitud ekspertide kogu raportit "Hinnang kuuenda raamprogrammi uute instrumentide tõhususele"
– having regard to the “Evaluation of the effectiveness of the New Instruments of Framework Programme VI”, Report of a High-Level Expert Panel chaired by Professor Ramon Marimon
– võttes arvesse Wim Kok'i juhitud Lissaboni strateegia kõrgetasemelise töörühma raportit
– having regard to the report on the Lisbon Strategy by the High-Level Group chaired by Mr Wim Kok
– võttes arvesse viie aasta hindamisaruannet teadusuuringute ja tehnoloogilise arengu kohta infoühiskonna tehnoloogiates, mille valmistas ette hr J. M. Gago juhitud vaekogu
– having regard to the report on the five year assessment of research and technology development (RTD) in information society technologies, prepared by the panel chaired by Mr J.M. Gago
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni teatist väljakutsete kohta Euroopa infoühiskonnale pärast 2005. aastat ( KOM(2004)0757 );
– having regard to the Commission’s communication on the challenges for the European information society beyond 2005 ( COM(2004)0757 ),
– võttes arvesse keskkonnatehnoloogia tegevuskava, milles tõdeti, et nii avaliku kui ka erasektori investeeringud teadusuuringutesse on ELi majandusele, sealhulgas ökoloogilistele majandusharudele eluliselt tähtsad ( KOM(2004)0038 );
– having regard to the environmental technologies action plan, which recognised that ‘investing in research, from both public and private sources, is vital for the EU economy, including eco-industries’ ( COM(2004)0038 ),
– võttes arvesse komisjoni teatist taastuvenergia osa kohta ELis, milles komisjon tõdeb, et on vaja kiirendada avalikkuse toetuse kasvu taastuvaid energiaallikaid puudutavatele teadusuuringutele, nende tehnoloogilisele arengule ja nende kasutamisvõimaluste demonstreerimisele Euroopas ( KOM(2004)0366 );
– having regard to the Commission’s communication on the share of renewable energy in the EU, in which it accepts that it is ‘necessary to ... accelerate the pace of public support for research, technological development and demonstration in renewables ... in Europe’ ( COM(2004)0366 ),
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni direktiivi ettepanekut ja kahte soovitust kolmandate riikide kodanikele sissepääsu lubamiseks teadustöö tegemise eesmärgil Euroopa Ühenduses ( KOM(2004)0178 );
– having regard to the Commission's proposals for a Directive and two Recommendations on the admission of third-country nationals to carry out scientific research in the European Community ( COM(2004)0178 ),
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni tehnoloogiaplatvormide alase teenistustevahelise rühma raportit
– having regard to the report compiled by a Commission Inter-Service Group on Technology Platforms
– võttes arvesse innovatsiooni tegevuskava uut redaktsiooni puudutavat ettevalmistustööd ning käimasolevaid konsultatsioone konkurentsivõime ja innovatsiooni raamprogrammi koostamiseks;
– having regard to the preparatory work towards a new version of the Action Plan on Innovation, and to the ongoing consultations with a view to a framework programme for competitiveness and innovation,
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artikli 45;
– having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjoni raportit ( A6-0046/2005 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0046/2005 ),
A. edusammud Euroopa teadusruumi loomisel on esimene samm Lissaboni strateegia, sealhulgas nii kuuenda raamprogrammiga kui ka muude teadusuuringute ja tehnoloogilise arenguga seotud algatuste elluviimiseks , mis lisas teadustegevusse uut dünaamikat ning millega määratleti uued vahendid Euroopa teadusruumi (ERA) loomiseks;
A. progress in the establishment of the European Research Area (ERA) is a first step in the implementation of the Lisbon strategy, including both the FP6 and other RTD policy initiatives, which created a new dynamic for research and defined new instruments to establish the ERA,
B. Euroopa Komisjon tegutses järjekindlalt, pidades ELi uue finantsperspektiivi ettepanekutes esmatähtsaks teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, samuti tehes ettepaneku seitsmenda raamprogrammi eelarve kahekordistamiseks; mõned netomaksjatest liikmesriigid on nõudnud ühenduse eelarve kärpimist nii, et see ei ületaks 1% Euroopa Liidu SKTst, ning finantsperspektiiv 2007–2013 peab olema kooskõlas Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekuga seitsmenda raamprogrammi eelarve kahekordistamise kohta;
B. the Commission acted consistently by attributing primary importance to research and innovation in its proposals for the EU's new financial perspectives, as well as when it made the proposal to double the budget for the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7); and whereas some Member States which are net contributors have called for the Community budget to be cut to no more than 1% of the Union's GDP, and the 2007-2013 financial perspective has to be consistent with the Commission proposal to double the budget for FP7,
C. Kok'i raportis tunnistati "Euroopa atraktiivsuse tõstmine teadlastele" ning "teadus- ja arendustegevuse prioriteetseks muutmine" sellisteks poliitikavaldkondadeks, mis nõuavad viivitamatut tegutsemist ja on vältimatuks eelduseks Lissaboni eesmärkide saavutamisele , samuti peeti selles vajalikuks rakendada terviklähenemist, et tagada info- ja sidetehnoloogia areng ning omaksvõtmine;
C. the Kok report has identified ‘increasing Europe’s attractiveness for researchers and scientists’ and ‘making R&D a top priority’ among the policy areas requiring urgent action and as being essential requirements for achieving the Lisbon goals, and has also identified the need to adopt a holistic approach in order to ensure the development and uptake of ICT,
D. Marimon'i raportis toetatakse kuuenda raamprogrammi vahendeid ja rõhutatakse järjepidevuse tähtsust teadusprogrammide planeerimisel, aga soovitatakse ka mitmeid korrigeerivaid meetmeid;
D. the Marimon report endorses the FP6 instruments and underlines the necessity of continuity in the planning of research programmes, but proposes a series of corrective measures,
E. kontrollikoja eriaruandes nr 1/2004, mis käsitleb viienda raamprogrammi teadusuuringuid ja tehnoloogilist arengut puudutava kaudse tegevuse haldamist, märgitakse, et Euroopa teadusuuringute ja tehnoloogia raamprogrammides osalemise reeglid on liiga keerulised ning see on toonud kaasa tõsiseid probleeme, eriti vähem arenenud haldusstruktuuridega väikestele organisatsioonidele;
E. the Court of Auditors’ special report No 1/2004 on the management of indirect RTD actions under FP5 noted that the rules of participation in the European RTD framework programmes are too complex, and this has presented serious problems, especially for small organisations with less developed administrative structures,
E. alusuuringud on eduka innovatsiooni aluseks ning viimase kahe aasta jooksul on Euroopa tasandil arutletud teatud struktuuri (Euroopa teadusnõukogu) vajalikkuse üle, et toetada Euroopa tasandil teaduslikult autonoomseid alusuuringuid;
F. basic research is crucial for successful innovation and the long-term competitiveness of the European Union, and a lengthy debate has been ongoing at European level during the past two years on the need for a structure (European Research Council) to support at European level basic research enjoying scientific autonomy,
G. arvutuste kohaselt vajab EL 2010. aastaks 700 000 uut, kvalifitseeritud teadlast, kui soovitakse saavutada eesmärk eraldada 3% SKTst teadus- ja arendustegevusele; eduka Marie Curie programmil on eriti tähtis roll teadlaste toetamisel;
G. it is estimated that the EU needs 700 000 new, adequately skilled researchers by 2010 if the target of 3% of GDP investment in R&D is to be reached; and whereas the successful Marie Curie Programme has a particularly important role to play in supporting researchers,
H. kiired ja suure läbilaskevõimega elektroonilised sidevõrgud ning muud info- ja sidetehnoloogia vahendid ja infrastruktuurid muudavad teadlaste suhtlemis-, koostöö- ja innovatsiooni viise ja seetõttu on vaja tagada ühenduse järjepidev ja adekvaatne toetus teadusuuringute võrgustiku infrastruktuuridele projekti GEANT raames;
H. high-speed, high-capacity electronic communication networks and other ICT tools and infrastructures are changing the way researchers communicate, cooperate and innovate, and it is necessary to provide continuous and adequate Community support to research network infrastructures within the GEANT project,
I. tuleb parandada eraõiguslike teadusuuringute raamtingimusi, kuna kaks kolmandikku investeeringutest teadusuuringutesse, mis on vajalikud 3% eesmärgi saavutamiseks, peaks tulema ettevõtlussektorist;
I. it is necessary to improve framework conditions for private research, since two thirds of the investment in research needed to reach the 3% target should come from the business sector,
J. noorte hulgas on vaja tekitada uut huvi teaduse vastu ning edendada teadusega seotud erialasid, pöörates erilist tähelepanu naiste osaluse suurendamisele;
J. it is necessary to create new enthusiasm among young people for science and to promote scientific careers with special attention paid to fostering the participation of women,
K. teadlaste liikumine Euroopa Liidus, samuti kahesuunaline liikumine ELi ja kolmandate riikide, riiklike ja erasektori teaduskeskuste, ülikoolide ja tööstuse vahel ning erinevate ettevõtlussektorite vahel on võtmeelement teadmiste, uuenduste ja säästva arengu loomisel;
K. mobility of researchers within the EU, as well as two-way mobility between the EU and third countries, public and private research centres, universities and industry, and between different business sectors is an essential element for the creation of new knowledge, innovation and sustainable development,
L. madala ja keskmise tehnoloogilise tasemega väikestel ja mikroettevõtetel, sealhulgas traditsioonilistel ettevõtetel on märkimisväärne varjatud potentsiaal innovatsiooniks, tehnosiirdeks ning teadusuuringuteks ja arendustegevuseks, mida ei ole seni piisavalt ära kasutatud, kuid mida vastavalt Euroopa väikeettevõtete harta mõttele ja hartas sätestatud suunistele tuleks tugevdada;
L. low- and medium-technology small- and micro-scale enterprises, including traditional businesses, have a considerable reserve of hidden potential for innovation, technology transfer, and research and development that as yet has not been sufficiently tapped, but should be fostered in accordance with the spirit of, and the guidelines set out in, the European Charter for Small Enterprises,