natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Käesolevat jagu ei kohaldata allhangete ega esindussuhete puhul , kui allhanke pakkujat või agenti käsitletakse lepingu põhjal samaväärsena asutuse või isikuga, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse käesoleva direktiivi sätteid.
This Section shall not apply to outsourcing or agency relationships where on the basis of a contractual arrangement the outsourcing service provider or agent is to be regarded as synonymous with the institution or person covered by this Directive.
Käesoleva direktiivi artikleid 13 kuni 15 ei kohaldata asutuste või isikute, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse käesoleva direktiivi sätteid, ja kolmandate isikute vahelise esindussuhte puhul, mis puudutab artikli 7 lõike 1 punktidest a, b ja c tulenevate kohustuste täitmist , kui allhanke pakkujat või agenti käsitletakse lepingu põhjal samaväärsena asutuse või isikuga, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse käesoleva direktiivi sätteid.
Articles 13 to 15 of this Directive shall not apply to any agency relationship between institutions or persons covered by this Directive and third parties regarding fulfilment of the obligations arising from Article 7(1)(a), (b) and (c) where on the basis of a contractual arrangement the outsourcing service provider or agent is to be regarded as synonymous with the institution or person covered by this Directive.
Article 13 requires that third parties are equivalent to those listed in Article 2.
Article 13 requires that third parties are equivalent to those listed in Article 2.
However, some undertakings, such as motor dealers and other retailers, act in some Member States as agents to lenders and obtain the evidence on their behalf.
However, some undertakings, such as motor dealers and other retailers, act in some Member States as agents to lenders and obtain the evidence on their behalf.
Whilst the ultimate responsibility rests with the lender, the agent can carry out basic checks such as verifying photographic identity.
Whilst the ultimate responsibility rests with the lender, the agent can carry out basic checks such as verifying photographic identity.
This amendment, therefore, would expedite identity checks and remove a disproportionate barrier to the functioning of the Internal Market.
This amendment, therefore, would expedite identity checks and remove a disproportionate barrier to the functioning of the Internal Market.
Ettepanek võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv rahandussüsteemi rahapesuks, sealhulgas terrorismi rahastamiseks, kasutamise vältimise kohta
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Christopher Heaton-Harris, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Henrik Dam Kristensen, Alexander Lambsdorff, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Manuel Medina Ortega, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Andreas Schwab, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon, Barbara Weiler, Phillip Whitehead
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Christopher Heaton-Harris, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Henrik Dam Kristensen, Alexander Lambsdorff, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Manuel Medina Ortega, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Andreas Schwab, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon, Barbara Weiler, Phillip Whitehead
ÕIGUSKOMISJONI ARVAMUS
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs
The Commission's proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing is the third Directive in this field following those of 1999 and 2001.
The Commission's proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing is the third Directive in this field following those of 1999 and 2001.
This directive comes against an international backdrop of concern about terrorism and its financing; accordingly the political imperative for further legislation is strong.
This directive comes against an international backdrop of concern about terrorism and its financing; accordingly the political imperative for further legislation is strong.
In this respect it is entirely regrettable that the second directive has only recently been implemented in some Member States, with the Commission still having to take enforcement action against one Member State.
In this respect it is entirely regrettable that the second directive has only recently been implemented in some Member States, with the Commission still having to take enforcement action against one Member State.
In these circumstances there has been little or no opportunity to properly reflect on and or examine the effectiveness of the earlier legislation.
In these circumstances there has been little or no opportunity to properly reflect on and or examine the effectiveness of the earlier legislation.
The motives for a further directive are clearly the wish to deal effectively with the financing of terrorist activities and to respond to the latest recommendations of the FATF.
The motives for a further directive are clearly the wish to deal effectively with the financing of terrorist activities and to respond to the latest recommendations of the FATF.
Your draftsman acknowledges the need to strengthen EU legislation in this respect and welcomes the extension of the scope of the directive to all service providers dealing with corporate and trust matters, omitted from the 2001 directive and identified by FATF as being vulnerable to money laundering.
Your draftsman acknowledges the need to strengthen EU legislation in this respect and welcomes the extension of the scope of the directive to all service providers dealing with corporate and trust matters, omitted from the 2001 directive and identified by FATF as being vulnerable to money laundering.
However the proposed Directive again deals with the position of legal professionals in respect
However the proposed Directive again deals with the position of legal professionals in respect
of whom the Commission has not, it appears, taken steps to carry out the review provided for by Article 2 of the 2001 directive in relation to the specific treatment of lawyers and other independent legal professionals.
of whom the Commission has not, it appears, taken steps to carry out the review provided for by Article 2 of the 2001 directive in relation to the specific treatment of lawyers and other independent legal professionals.
This failure combined with the lack of any legislative impact assessment of the proposal or analysis of the effectiveness of the earlier two directives raises serious concerns about process.
This failure combined with the lack of any legislative impact assessment of the proposal or analysis of the effectiveness of the earlier two directives raises serious concerns about process.
In addition to which this proposal is now subject to the co-decision procedure and a political agreement has been reached without awaiting the Parliament’s opinion.
In addition to which this proposal is now subject to the co-decision procedure and a political agreement has been reached without awaiting the Parliament’s opinion.
Your rapporteur feels that these problems about process are compounded by the serious constitutional and fundamental rights issues which have been raised in some jurisdictions about the extent to which legal professionals should be covered by anti-money laundering legislation, having regard to the lawyer-client confidentiality principle.
Your rapporteur feels that these problems about process are compounded by the serious constitutional and fundamental rights issues which have been raised in some jurisdictions about the extent to which legal professionals should be covered by anti-money laundering legislation, having regard to the lawyer-client confidentiality principle.
Your draftsman would urge caution with regard to further immediate legislation in this particular area covered by the proposal, given the uncertainty of the current legal and constitutional situation.
Your draftsman would urge caution with regard to further immediate legislation in this particular area covered by the proposal, given the uncertainty of the current legal and constitutional situation.
Obligations arising from the second directive are being challenged through the courts by Bar Associations in both Belgium and Poland.
Obligations arising from the second directive are being challenged through the courts by Bar Associations in both Belgium and Poland.
Indeed, it is noteworthy that despite its active stance against terrorism the USA has so far not felt it appropriate to impose reporting obligations on legal professionals mainly as a result of representations from the American Bar Association raising constitutional issues.
Indeed, it is noteworthy that despite its active stance against terrorism the USA has so far not felt it appropriate to impose reporting obligations on legal professionals mainly as a result of representations from the American Bar Association raising constitutional issues.
Regard should also be had to the petition presented to the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament by a number of Member State bar associations (petition 693/2003).
Regard should also be had to the petition presented to the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament by a number of Member State bar associations (petition 693/2003).
In this situation extreme care needs to be taken in respect of the position of legal professionals and amendments are proposed by your rapporteur accordingly.
In this situation extreme care needs to be taken in respect of the position of legal professionals and amendments are proposed by your rapporteur accordingly.
Further, in order to keep this area under tight review amendments are also proposed to the activities of the Money Laundering Committee and to the Final Provisions.
Further, in order to keep this area under tight review amendments are also proposed to the activities of the Money Laundering Committee and to the Final Provisions.
Õiguskomisjon palub lisada vastutaval kodanikuvabaduste, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjonil oma raportisse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv rahandussüsteemi rahapesuks , sealhulgas terrorismi rahastamiseks , kasutamise vältimise kohta
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering , including terrorist financing
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv rahandussüsteemi rahapesuks ja terrorismi rahastamiseks kasutamise vältimise kohta
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing
Even if the scope of the Directive quite properly includes terrorist financing, the latter should be viewed as distinct from money laundering.
Even if the scope of the Directive quite properly includes terrorist financing, the latter should be viewed as distinct from money laundering.
Terrorist financing is in practice not an instrument of money laundering, but is a criminal offence in its own right.
Terrorist financing is in practice not an instrument of money laundering, but is a criminal offence in its own right.
See muudetud direktiiv rakendati mõnedes liikmesriikides alles hiljuti ja ühes liikmesriigis ei ole seda siiamaani rakendatud.
Th at Directive, as amended, has only recently been implemented in some Member States and still remains unimplemented in one Member State.
Nendes tingimustes ja vastavalt kõigi ühenduse institutsioonide kohustusele hinnata õigusaktide mõjusid on asjakohane põhjalikult hinnata, kas direktiiv 91/308/EMÜ on saavutanud oma eesmärgi kajastada parimaid rahvusvahelisi tavasid selles valdkonnas ning kehtestada kõrge standard rahandussektori ja muude ohualdiste tegevusalade kaitsmiseks kuritegelikul teel saadud tulu kahjuliku mõju eest.
In these circumstances and in compliance with the commitment of all the Community institutions to undertake a legislative impact assessment, it is appropriate to conduct a detailed assessment of whether Directive 91/308/EEC has achieved its aim of reflecting best international practice in this area and of setting a high standard in protecting the financial sector and other vulnerable activities from the harmful effects of the proceeds of crime.
Niisugune hindamine peaks tegema kindlaks ka aruandluse ja teiste selles direktiivis sisalduvate täitemehhanismide tõhususe, et anda teavet praeguste ja tulevaste õigusaktide jaoks, eriti mis puudutab rakendusmenetlusi.
Such assessment should also ascertain the effectiveness of reporting and other enforcement mechanisms contained in that Directive so as to inform current and future legislation, in particular as regards implementation procedures.
8) Lisaks tuleks käesoleva direktiivi reguleerimisalasse kuuluvat kuritegelikku tegevust laiendada nii, et hõlmatud oleks ka võitlus terrorismi ja terrorismi rahastamise vastu.
(8) Furthermore, the range of criminal activity covered by the scope of this Directive should be expanded in order to include the fight against terrorism and terrorist financing.
8 a) Üldine kohustus tõhusate, proportsionaalsete ja hoiatavate sanktsioonide võtmiseks koos artiklis 1 ettenähtud kuritegelikuks tunnistamise nõudega tähendab, et kliendi isiku tõendamise, dokumentide säilitamise ja rahapesuga seotud kahtlastest tehingutest teatamise kohustuse täitmatajätmise eest tuleks füüsiliste isikute suhtes rakendada kriminaalkaristusi , kuna selliseid isikuid tuleb vaadata kui rahapesus osalejaid.
(8a) The general obligation to adopt effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, combined with the criminalisation obligation of Article 1, means that criminal sanctions should apply to natural persons who infringe obligations on customer identification, record-keeping and reporting of suspicious transactions for the purpose of money laundering, since such persons have to be regarded as participating in the money laundering activity.
8 a) Üldine kohustus tõhusate, proportsionaalsete ja hoiatavate sanktsioonide võtmiseks koos artiklis 1 ettenähtud kuritegelikuks tunnistamise nõudega tähendab, et kliendi isiku tõendamise, dokumentide säilitamise ja rahapesuga seotud kahtlastest tehingutest teatamise kohustuse täitmatajätmise eest tuleks füüsiliste isikute suhtes rakendada karistusi , kuna selliseid isikuid tuleb vaadata kui rahapesus osalejaid.
(8a) The general obligation to adopt effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, combined with the criminalisation obligation of Article 1, means that sanctions should apply to natural persons who infringe obligations on customer identification, record-keeping and reporting of suspicious transactions for the purpose of money laundering, since such persons have to be regarded as participating in the money laundering activity.
It would be more appropriate to rely on FATF Recommendation 17, which proposes that in cases of an infringement of AML obligations countries should provide for proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, whether criminal, civil or administrative.
It would be more appropriate to rely on FATF Recommendation 17, which proposes that in cases of an infringement of AML obligations countries should provide for proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, whether criminal, civil or administrative.
The ultimate choice depends on the legal systems of the respective Member States, based on the principle of subsidiarity.
The ultimate choice depends on the legal systems of the respective Member States, based on the principle of subsidiarity.
10) Ainult rahapesu keelamisest rahapesu , sealhulgas terrorismi rahastamise , tõhusaks vältimiseks ei piisa ning tuleb kehtestada kriminaalõiguslikud sanktsioonid.
(10) The mere prohibition of money laundering is not sufficient and it is necessary to foresee criminal law sanctions in order to ensure that money laundering , including terrorist financing , is effectively prevented.
10) Ainult rahapesu keelamisest rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõhusaks vältimiseks ei piisa ning tuleb kehtestada kriminaalõiguslikud sanktsioonid.
(10) The mere prohibition of money laundering is not sufficient and it is necessary to foresee criminal law sanctions in order to ensure that money laundering and terrorist financing are effectively prevented.
The financing of terrorist acts is not a special case of money laundering, but a criminal offence in its own right.
The financing of terrorist acts is not a special case of money laundering, but a criminal offence in its own right.
Terrorist financing is in practice not an instrument of money laundering.
Terrorist financing is in practice not an instrument of money laundering.
Arvestades, et direktiiv 91/308/EMÜ mõjutab põhiõigusi ning eelkõige õigust õiguskaitse kättesaadavusele ja õigust saada õiglaselt ära kuulatud, peab komisjon vastavalt direktiivis esitatud ajakavale teostama läbivaatamise.
Given that Directive 91/308/EEC affects fundamental rights, and especially the right of access to justice and the right to a fair hearing, the Commission needs to carry out a review in accordance with the schedule laid down in the Directive.
Kui teatud kutsealade puhul on tõendeid probleemidest rakendamisel ja kohaldamisel, tuleks viivitamata teostada läbivaatamine.
Where there is evidence of problems with implementation and application for certain professions an immediate review should be undertaken.
Article 2 of Directive 91/308/EEC, as amended, stipulated that ‘Within three years of the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall carry out a particular examination, in the context of the report provided for in Article 17 of Directive 91/308/EEC, of ... the specific treatment of lawyers and other independent legal professionals, ...’.
Article 2 of Directive 91/308/EEC, as amended, stipulated that ‘Within three years of the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall carry out a particular examination, in the context of the report provided for in Article 17 of Directive 91/308/EEC, of ... the specific treatment of lawyers and other independent legal professionals, ...’.
13) Siiski ei oleks asjakohane direktiivi alusel kohustada seaduslikult tunnustatud ja kontrollitavate õigusnõu andvate kutsealade sõltumatuid esindajaid, näiteks advokaate, teatama rahapesu kahtlusest, kui nad selgitavad kliendi õiguslikku olukorda või esindavad klienti kohtumenetluses.
(13) Where independent members of professions providing legal advice which are legally recognised and controlled, such as lawyers, are ascertaining the legal position of a client or representing a client in legal proceedings, it would not be appropriate under the Directive to put these legal professionals in respect of these activities under an obligation to report suspicions of money laundering.
Enne kohtumenetlust, selle käigus või pärast seda või kliendi õigusliku olukorra selgitamisel saadud teabe osas tuleb teha erand teatamiskohustusest.
There should be exemptions from any obligation to report information obtained either before, during or after judicial proceedings, or in the course of ascertaining the legal position for a client.
Seetõttu kehtib õigusnõustamisel ametisaladuse hoidmise kohustus, välja arvatud juhul, kui õigusnõustaja osaleb rahapesus või õigusnõu antakse rahapesu eesmärgil või kui advokaat teab, et klient soovib õigusnõu rahapesu eesmärgil.
Thus, legal advice should remain subject to the obligation of professional secrecy unless the legal counsellor is taking part in money laundering activities, the legal advice is provided for money laundering purposes, or the lawyer knows that the client is seeking legal advice for money laundering purposes
Enne kohtumenetlust, selle käigus või pärast seda või kliendi õigusliku olukorra selgitamisel saadud teabe osas tuleb teha erand teatamiskohustusest.
There must be exemptions from any obligation to report information obtained either before, during or after judicial proceedings, or in the course of ascertaining the legal position for a client.
Seetõttu kehtib õigusnõustamisel ametisaladuse hoidmise kohustus, välja arvatud juhul, kui õigusnõustaja osaleb rahapesus või õigusnõu antakse rahapesu eesmärgil või kui advokaat teab, et klient soovib õigusnõu rahapesu eesmärgil , ja ei keeldu kliendi advokaadina õigusnõu andmisest .
Thus, legal advice remains subject to the obligation of professional secrecy unless the legal counsellor is taking part in money laundering activities, the legal advice is provided for money laundering purposes, or the lawyer knows that the client is seeking legal advice for money laundering purposes and fails to refrain from giving advice as the client’s lawyer.
Tuleks tagada, et neid sätteid kontrollitakse selles osas, kas need on kooskõlas põhiõiguste hartas sätestatud põhiõiguste austamise põhimõttega ja Euroopa Parlamendi 14. oktoobri 2004. aasta soovitusega.
It should be ensured that these provisions are monitored for compliance with the principle of respect for fundamental rights as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in accordance with the European Parliament's recommendation of 14 October 2004.
Recital 12 claims that the coverage in respect of legal professionals should be ‘maintained unchanged’; if this is indeed to be the case the wording should be exactly the same as in the previous directives rather than appearing to introduce changes which soften the protection of legal professional privilege.
Recital 12 claims that the coverage in respect of legal professionals should be ‘maintained unchanged’; if this is indeed to be the case the wording should be exactly the same as in the previous directives rather than appearing to introduce changes which soften the protection of legal professional privilege.
In its report ( A6-0010/2004 ) adopted in the plenary by the European Parliament on 14 October 2004, ( P6_TA(2004)0022 ) the Parliament recommended that, when defining the area of justice, security and freedom, the European Council and the Council should base their actions, among other things, on ‘promoting fundamental rights and freedoms through policies linked to the area of freedom, security and justice’.
In its report ( A6-0010/2004 ) adopted in the plenary by the European Parliament on 14 October 2004, ( P6_TA(2004)0022 ) the Parliament recommended that, when defining the area of justice, security and freedom, the European Council and the Council should base their actions, among other things, on ‘promoting fundamental rights and freedoms through policies linked to the area of freedom, security and justice’.
The list of detailed actions under this criterion includes the following: ‘calling for prior monitoring for respect for fundamental rights (as laid down by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union) of any legislative act of the Union or of the Community’.
The list of detailed actions under this criterion includes the following: ‘calling for prior monitoring for respect for fundamental rights (as laid down by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union) of any legislative act of the Union or of the Community’.
Põhjendus 19 a (uus)
Recital 19 a (new)