natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ühenduse rahastamine võib hõlmata kulusid, mis on seotud käesoleva määruse rakendamiseks ja selle eesmärkide saavutamiseks otseselt vajalike ettevalmistamis-, jälgimis-, järelevalve-, auditi- ja hindamistoimingutega, nt uuringud, kohtumised, teave, teadlikkuse tõstmine, koolitus ja kirjastamistegevus, kulusid, mis on seotud teabevahetuse arvutivõrkudega, ning muid haldus- või tehnilise abi kulusid, mis võivad komisjonil tekkida programmi haldamisel.
Community financing may cover expenditure associated with the preparation, follow-up, monitoring, auditing and evaluation activities directly necessary for the implementation of this Regulation and the achievement of its objectives, e.g. studies, meetings, information, awareness-raising, training and publication activities, expenditure associated with computer networks for the exchange of information and any other administrative or technical assistance expenditure that the Commission may incur for the management of the programme.
See katab ka kulud abihaldustöötajatele, kes haldavad komisjoni delegatsioonides käesoleva määruse alusel rahastatavaid projekte.
It shall also cover expenditure on administrative support staff employed at Commission Delegations to manage projects funded under this Regulation.
Lisaks loob see admebaasi kõigi omandatud kogemuste säilitamiseks.
Lastly, it shall create a database in which to store all the experience acquired.
Andmebaasile on juurdepääs kõigil üksustel, kes on abikõlblikud käesoleva määruse artikli 12 alusel.
The database shall be accessible to any actor eligible under Article 12 of this Regulation.
Artikli 15 lõike 1 esimene taane
Article 15, paragraph 1, indent 1
– liikmesriigid ja eelkõige nende avalik-õiguslikud ja riigi osalusega asutused;
– Member States, and in particular their public and parastatal agencies;
– liikmesriigid , eelkõige nende avalik-õiguslikud ja riigi osalusega asutused ning nende detsentraliseeritud organid ;
– Member States, in particular their public and parastatal agencies and their decentralised bodies ;
Käesoleva määruse alusel rahastatavaid meetmeid rakendatakse kooskõlas Euroopa Ühenduste üldeelarve suhtes kohaldatava finantsmäärusega.
The measures financed under this Regulation shall be implementing in accordance with the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Käesoleva määruse alusel rahastatavaid meetmeid rakendatakse kooskõlas Euroopa ühenduste üldeelarve suhtes kohaldatava finantsmäärusega.
The measures financed under this Regulation shall be implemented in accordance with the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Sellest hoolimata esitab komisjon hiljemalt aasta pärast käesoleva määruse jõustumist nõukogule ettepaneku finantsmääruse läbivaatamiseks, et lisada sinna erandlik menetlus välisabi rahastamise meetmete jaotamise ja järelevalve jaoks.
However, no later than one year following the entry of force of this Regulation, the Commission shall propose to the Council a revision of the Financial Regulation with a view to incorporating into it a dispensatory procedure for granting and monitoring measures for financing external aid.
Nende erireeglite eesmärgiks on lihtsustada mitteriiklike osalejate ühenduse välisabile juurdepääsu tingimusi ning hõlbustada väikeste ja keskmise suurusega projektide rahastamist.
These special rules are intended to ease the terms of access to external Community aid for non-state actors and to facilitate the financing of micro- and medium-scale projects.
Detsentraliseeritud haldamise korral võib komisjon otsustada kasutada soodustatud riigi või piirkonna hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkurssi.
In the case of decentralised management, the Commission may decide to use the procurement or grant procedures of the beneficiary country or region.
Detsentraliseeritud haldamise korral võib komisjon otsustada kasutada soodustatud riigi või piirkonna hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkurssi , olles kontrollinud, et viimaste puhul järgitakse finantsmääruse olulisemaid põhimõtteid .
In the case of decentralised management, the Commission may decide to use the procurement or grant procedures of the beneficiary country or region after verifying that they respect the basic principles of the Financial Regulation .
Käesoleva määruse alusel rahastatavate hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkursil võivad osaleda kõik Euroopa Ühenduse liikmesriikide füüsilised või juriidilised isikud, kes kuuluvad asutamislepingute reguleerimisalasse.
Participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts financed under this Regulation shall be open to all natural or legal persons from Member States of the European Community coming within the scope of the Treaties.
Käesoleva määruse suhtes kohaldatakse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruses nr .../... välisabi kättesaadavuse kohta [seni avaldamata] sätestatud osalemist ja päritolu käsitlevaid eeskirju.
The rules on participation and origin which are applicable to this Regulation shall be those laid down in European Parliament and Council Regulation No…/… on access to external assistance [not yet published].
Käesoleva määruse alusel rahastatavate hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkursil võivad osaleda ka kõik järgmiste riikide füüsilised ja juriidilised isikud:
Participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts financed under this Regulation shall be also open to all natural and legal persons from:
– mis tahes riik, kes on ühinemiseelse vahendi soodustatu,
– any country that is beneficiary of the Instrument for Pre-Accession,
– ELi väline riik, mis kuulub Euroopa Majanduspiirkonda, ja
– any non-EU Member State of the European Economic Area, and
– mis tahes kolmas riik või territoorium, juhul kui on kehtestatud vastastikune juurdepääs välisabile.
– any other third country or territory in cases where reciprocal access to external assistance has been established.
Meetmete korral, mis on võetud kolmandas riigis, mida peetakse vähimarenenud riigiks vastavalt OECD sätestatud kriteeriumidele, lubatakse hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkursil osaleda üldistel alustel.
In the case of measures taken in any third country considered a Least Developed Country according to the criteria laid down by the OECD, participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts shall be open on a global basis.
Artiklis 4 osutatud eriabimeetmete ja vaheprogrammide puhul lubatakse hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkursil osaleda üldistel alustel.
In the case of exceptional assistance measures and interim programmes referred to in Article 4, participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts shall be open on a global basis.
Hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkursil võivad osaleda:
Participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts, and rules of origin shall be open:
– artikli 4 lõikes 4 määratletud liiki temaatilise strateegia alusel võetud meetmete korral arengumaa või üleminekuriigi (vastavalt OECD määratlusele) või temaatiliste programmide alusel mis tahes muu abikõlbliku riigi mis tahes füüsilised või juriidilised isikud;
– in the case of measures adopted under a thematic strategy of the type defined in Article 4(4), to any natural or legal person of a developing country or country in transition, as defined by the OECD, and of any other country eligible under the thematic programme;
– artikli 4 lõike 4 punktis b sätestatud riikliku või piirkondliku strateegia alusel võetud meetmete korral mis tahes füüsilised või juriidilised isikud, kes on abikõlblikud vastavalt põhiõigusaktile, mille alusel strateegia vastu võeti;
– in the case of measures adopted under a country or regional strategy provided for under article 4(4)b, to any natural or legal person eligible according to the basic act under which the strategy was adopted;
– artikli 4 lõike 4 punkti a alusel sätestatud piirkondliku strateegia alusel võetud meetmete korral mis tahes füüsilised või juriidilised isikud riikidest või territooriumidelt, millele selline strateegia on suunatud.
– in the case of measures adopted under a regional strategy provided for under article 4(4)a), to any natural or legal person from the countries or territories addressed by such strategy.
Käesoleva määruse raames rahastatavate hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkurssidel on õigus osaleda rahvusvahelistel organisatsioonidel.
Participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts financed under this Regulation shall be open to international organisations.
Hanke- või toetuslepingute sõlmimise konkursside raames soovitatud eksperdid ei pea vastama eespool sätestatud päritolureeglitele.
Experts proposed in the context of procedures for the award of contracts need not comply with the nationality rules set out above.
Mis tahes kaubad ja seadmed, mis ostetakse käesoleva määruse raames rahastatavate lepingute alusel, peavad pärinema ühendusest või käesoleva artikli lõigetes 2 ja 5 loetletud kriteeriumidele vastavast riigist.
All supplies and materials purchased under contracts financed under this Regulation shall originate from the Community or a country eligible under paragraphs 2 to 5 above.
Selliste riikide või territooriumide füüsiliste ja juriidiliste isikute osalemine, millel on partnerriigiga tavapärased majanduslikud, kaubanduslikud või geograafilised sidemed, otsustatakse iga juhtumi puhul eraldi.
Participation by natural and legal persons from third countries or territories with traditional economic, trade or geographical links to the partner country may be authorised on a case-by-case basis.
Nõuetekohaselt põhjendatud juhtudel võib komisjon lisaks sellele lubada muude riikide füüsiliste või juriidiliste isikute osalemist või muud päritolu vahendite ja materjalide kasutamist.
The Commission may, moreover, in duly substantiated cases authorise the participation of natural and legal persons from other countries, or the use of supplies and materials of different origin.
The terms and conditions governing participation and origin should therefore be gleaned from this most recent piece of legislation.
The terms and conditions governing participation and origin should therefore be gleaned from this most recent piece of legislation.
Kõnealuse määruse rakendamiseks kindlaksmääratud soovituslik finantsraamistik seitsmeaastaseks ajavahemikuks, mis algab 1. jaanuaril 2007, ulatub 4455 miljoni euroni.
The indicative financial framework for the implementation of this Regulation is set at EUR 4 455 million for a period of seven years beginning on 1 January 2007.
Juhul kui kõnealuse määruse kohaldamisala muudetakse, esitab komisjon ettepaneku võrdlussumma vastavaks muutmiseks.
If the legal scope of this Regulation is revised, the Commission shall present a proposal to adjust the financial reference amount accordingly.
Määruse vahehindamine
Mid-term review of this Regulation
Komisjon esitab Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule 31. detsembriks 2011 mis tahes ettepanekud käesoleva määruse tuleviku ja mis tahes muudatuste kohta, mis võivad olla vajalikud .
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council , by 31 December 2011, any proposals concerning the future of this Regulation and any amendments that may be necessary .
Komisjon esitab Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule hiljemalt 30. juuniks 2010 aruande, milles antakse ühine hinnang käesoleva määruse rakendamise esimesele kolmele aastale, vajadusel koos õigusakti ettepanekuga, mis sisaldab vajalikke muudatusi .
Not later than 30 June 2010, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report evaluating the implementation of this Regulation in the first three years together, if appropriate, with a legislative proposal introducing the necessary modifications hereto .
Käesolevat määrust kohaldatakse alates 1. jaanuarist 2007.
It shall apply from 1 January 2007.
Komisjon vaatas mainitud küsimuse läbi 13. juulil 2005 toimunud koosolekul.
The Committee considered the above question at its meeting of 13 July 2005.
Ettepanek põhineb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklil 308 ning EURATOMi asutamislepingu artiklil 203.
The proposal is based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty in conjunction with Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty.
EURATOMi asutamislepingul põhinev õiguslik alus pidi olema vajalik, et hõlmata ettepaneku tuumaohutuse aspektid.
The Euratom legal basis is said to be necessary in order to cover the nuclear safety aspects of the proposal.
Käesoleval juhul on nõutav parlamendiga konsulteerimine.
In this instance, consultation of Parliament is required.
Euroopa Ühenduste Kohtu kohtupraktikast tuleneb selgelt, et õigusliku aluse valik ei ole ühenduse seadusandja võimuses, vaid see peab põhinema objektiivsetel teguritel, mida on võimalik kohtulikult kontrollida.
The case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly indicates that the choice of legal basis is not at the discretion of the Community legislator but must be determined by objective facts which can be subject to judicial control.
Nende tegurite hulka kuuluvad eriti õigusakti eesmärk ja sisu
These facts include, in particular, the objective and substance of the legislative instrument
Määruse eesmärk on täpselt määratletud 1. artiklis: „Ühendus rahastab meetmeid, millega edendatakse rahu ja stabiilsust ning tagatakse tsiviilelanikkonna ohutus ja julgeolek kolmandates riikides ja territooriumidel kooskõlas käesoleva määruse sätetega.”.
The objective of the regulation is stated precisely in Article 1: 'The Community shall finance measures to promote peace and stability and assure the safety and security of the civilian population in third countries and territories in line with the provisions of this Regulation.'
Ettepaneku sisu viitab selgelt finants-, majandus- ja tehnilisele abile täiendavalt abile, mida tavapäraselt antakse humanitaarabivahendi, integreeritud ühinemiseelse vahendi, Euroopa naabrus- ja partnerlusvahendi ning arengukoostöö- ja majanduskoostöö vahendi alusel (artikkel 2).
The substance of the proposal is clearly concerned with providing financial, economic and technical assistance complementary to any assistance that is normally provided for under the Humanitarian Aid instrument, the Integrated Pre-accession instrument, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership instrument and the Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation instrument (Article 2).
EÜ asutamislepingu artikkel 308 võimaldab ühendusel kohandada oma volitusi seoses pädevusega ja lepingu eesmärkide saavutamisega.
Article 308 of the EC Treaty permits the Community to adjust its powers in the light of the powers and with a view to attaining the objectives of the Treaty.
Et kohaldada mainitud artiklit õigusliku alusena, peab vastavalt Euroopa Kohtu pretsedendiõigusele täitma järgnevad tingimused:
In order to take the aforementioned article as a legal basic for a legislative instrument, the Court of Justice has consistently held that the following conditions must be met:
· kavandatud tegevus peab olema suunatud ühenduse ühe eesmärgi saavutamisele;
● the action envisaged must have the aim of attaining one of the objectives of the Community;
· tegevus peab olema vajalik selle eesmärgi saavutamiseks;
● the action must be necessary for the attainment of that objective;
· leping ei pea muuhulgas ette nägema selleks vajalikke tegevusvolitusi.
● the Treaty must not otherwise confer powers to act for this purpose.
Ettepaneku eesmärgi ja sisu uurimisel võib näha, et kriisile reageerimise tsiviilaspektid pigem kuuluvad EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 179 ja 181a reguleerimisalasse, mis ei põhjenda EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 308 valikut õigusliku alusena.
From a consideration of the subject and substance of the proposal it may be concluded that the civil aspects of tackling crises fall rather under Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty, which does not justify the choice of Article 308 of the EC Treaty as a legal basis.
Õiguskomisjon on seega teinud järelduse, et EÜ asutamislepingu artiklid 179 ja 181a moodustavad sobiva õigusliku aluse ning et arvestades nimetatud artiklite ja EURATOMi asutamislepingu artikli 203 õigusliku kooskõla puudulikkust, tuleks tuumaohutust puudutavaid meetmeid hõlmavate aspektide suhtes esitada eraldi ettepanek.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs has accordingly concluded that Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty are the appropriate legal basis and that, in view of the incompatibility between those articles and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, it is necessary to submit a separate proposal concerning the aspects relating to nuclear safety measures.
Järelikult tuleb kohaldada kaasotsustamismenetlust.
The codecision procedure would therefore apply.
Arvestades eespoolnimetatuga, ning õiguslike aluste raportööri Antonio López-Istúriz White soovitusel, otsustas õiguskomisjon oma 13 juuli 2005. aasta koosolekul ühehäälselt
At its meeting of 13 July 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Hääletuse ajal viibisid kohal Giuseppe Gargani (esimees), Katalin Lévai (eseesimees), Antonio López-Istśriz White (arvamuse koostaja), Maria Berger, Monica Frassoni, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega (Nicola Zingaretti asemel), Viktória Mohįcsi, Aloyzas Sakalas ja Tadeusz Zwiefka. , et:
The following were present for the vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Katalin Lévai (vice-chairwoman), Antonio López-Istúriz White (draftsman), Maria Berger, Monica Frassoni, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega (for Nicola Zingaretti), Viktória Mohácsi, Aloyzas Sakalas and Tadeusz Zwiefka , on the basis of the above considerations and at the proposal of the rapporteur for legal bases, Mr Antonio López-Istúriz White, that:
· käesoleva määruse ettepaneku õiguslikuks aluseks peaks olema EÜ asutamislepingu artiklid 179 ja 181a, mitte EÜ asutamislepingu artikkel 308;
● the legal basis for the above proposal for a regulation should be Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty, not Article 308 of the EC Treaty;
· arvestades nimetatud artiklite ja EURATOMi asutamislepingu artikli 203 vastuolulisusega peaks komisjon esitama eraldi ettepaneku tuumaohutust puudutavaid meetmeid hõlmavate aspektide kohta.
● in view of the incompatibility between those articles and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, the Commission should submit a separate proposal concerning the aspects involving nuclear safety measures.
arengukomisjon I ARVAMUS (*)
OPINION of the Committee on Development (*)
The Instrument for Stability is one of the four new external-assistance instruments proposed by the Commission in the 'Prodi package'.
The Instrument for Stability is one of the four new external-assistance instruments proposed by the Commission in the 'Prodi package'.
Unlike the other three (which are geographically based), it is a thematic instrument.
Unlike the other three (which are geographically based), it is a thematic instrument.
The purpose of the Instrument for Stability is to provide a rapid, flexible and integrated response to crisis situations in third countries by means of a single legal instrument, until such time as normal cooperation can be resumed under one of the other instruments used for financing external relations.
The purpose of the Instrument for Stability is to provide a rapid, flexible and integrated response to crisis situations in third countries by means of a single legal instrument, until such time as normal cooperation can be resumed under one of the other instruments used for financing external relations.
As things stand at present, responses to crisis situations (such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq) may be triggered by means of no fewer than seven different EU financial instruments, each of which has its own decision-making procedures and its own budget constraints.
As things stand at present, responses to crisis situations (such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq) may be triggered by means of no fewer than seven different EU financial instruments, each of which has its own decision-making procedures and its own budget constraints.
The Instrument for Stability will serve to consolidate and unify the crisis-response mechanisms and hence to improve the response to crisis situations.
The Instrument for Stability will serve to consolidate and unify the crisis-response mechanisms and hence to improve the response to crisis situations.
In addition to responses to immediate crises the Instrument for Stability covers long-term cooperation within a stable environment for the purpose of dealing with global and regional trans-border challenges such as civil security (combating the various forms of trafficking, organised crime and terrorism), major technological threats and the development of peacekeeping capability.
In addition to responses to immediate crises the Instrument for Stability covers long-term cooperation within a stable environment for the purpose of dealing with global and regional trans-border challenges such as civil security (combating the various forms of trafficking, organised crime and terrorism), major technological threats and the development of peacekeeping capability.
Since there are limits imposed on the length of justifications, only the two main amendments proposed will be mentioned here.
Since there are limits imposed on the length of justifications, only the two main amendments proposed will be mentioned here.
- exclusion of points (b) and (c) of Article 2 of the Regulation.
- exclusion of points (b) and (c) of Article 2 of the Regulation.
In this opinion it is being proposed that the Regulation under consideration be stripped of everything which concerns long-term cooperation in a stable environment for the purpose of dealing with particular global and regional trans-border challenges (Article 2(b) and (c)).
In this opinion it is being proposed that the Regulation under consideration be stripped of everything which concerns long-term cooperation in a stable environment for the purpose of dealing with particular global and regional trans-border challenges (Article 2(b) and (c)).
It is not a question of rejecting such tasks as such but, rather, of calling for them to be performed within a more appropriate framework than the Instrument for Stability.
It is not a question of rejecting such tasks as such but, rather, of calling for them to be performed within a more appropriate framework than the Instrument for Stability.
To where and by what means could those tasks be transferred?
To where and by what means could those tasks be transferred?
Here are two possibilities:
Here are two possibilities:
- The tasks could be incorporated into the various geographical instruments as thematic programmes.
- The tasks could be incorporated into the various geographical instruments as thematic programmes.
All the geographical instruments contain clauses which link their various geographical areas in cases where the programme envisaged is global, horizontal, regional or cross-border in nature (see Article 22 of the Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation Instrument [DCECI] proposal and Article 27 of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument [ENPI]).
All the geographical instruments contain clauses which link their various geographical areas in cases where the programme envisaged is global, horizontal, regional or cross-border in nature (see Article 22 of the Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation Instrument [DCECI] proposal and Article 27 of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument [ENPI]).
Parliament and the Council would be involved in determining the political objectives and priorities assigned to the thematic programmes pursuant to the thematic-strategy document-adoption procedure laid down in the geographical financial instruments.
Parliament and the Council would be involved in determining the political objectives and priorities assigned to the thematic programmes pursuant to the thematic-strategy document-adoption procedure laid down in the geographical financial instruments.
- Alternatively, they could be placed within a single thematic framework instrument to be devised.
- Alternatively, they could be placed within a single thematic framework instrument to be devised.