natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Seetõttu oleks soovitav siduda ELi väliskoostöö raames antav panus struktuuri- ja institutsionaalsete reformidega, mille eesmärk on aidata kaasa terrorismi ja/või igasuguse vägivalla ja inimõiguste rikkumise kasutamise taunimisväärseks muutumisele.
It would, therefore, be a good idea to make European Union assistance in its cooperation with third countries dependent on the carrying-out of structural and institutional reforms, with the ultimate goal of completely discrediting terrorism or the use of any form of violence or violation of human rights.
Nadežda Sandolova nimetamine kontrollikoja liikmeks
on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PE 380.959v03-00
PE 380.958v03-00
ETTEPANEK VÕTTA VASTU EUROOPA PARLAMENDI OTSUS.......................................4
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
LISA 1: NADEŽDA SANDOLOVA ELULOOKIRJELDUS......................................................5
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF NADEZHDA SANDOLOVA.....................................4
LISA 2: NADEŽDA SANDOLOVA VASTUSED KÜSIMUSTIKULE.....................................8
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF NADEZHDA SANDOLOVA TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE.............7
Nadežda Sandolova kontrollikoja liikmeks nimetamise kohta
on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolava as a Member of the Court of Auditors
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 247 lõiget 3 ja EURATOMi asutamislepingu artikli 160b lõiget 3, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris Euroopa Parlamendiga ( C6-0411/2006 );
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0411/2006 ),
– arvestades, et oma 28. novembri 2006. aasta koosolekul kuulas eelarvekontrollikomisjon nõukogu esitatud kontrollikoja liikmekandidaati ning arutas tema kvalifikatsiooni vastavust EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 247 lõikes 2 ja EURATOMi asutamislepingu artikli 160b lõikes 2 sätestatud kriteeriumidele;
– whereas at its meeting of 28 November 2006 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,
– võttes arvesse eelarvekontrollikomisjoni raportit ( A6-0442/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0442/2006 ),
LISA 1: NADEŽDA SANDOLOVA ELULOOKIRJELDUS
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF NADEZHDA SANDOLOVA
Teaching micro and macroeconomics; Public control;
Teaching micro and macroeconomics ; Public control;
LISA 2: NADEŽDA SANDOLOVA VASTUSED KÜSIMUSTIKULE
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF NADEZHDA SANDOLOVA TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Within the Contact Committee of the Heads of the EU candidate country SAIs and the ECA, the Bulgarian NAO received extremely effective and crucial support in methodological and practical way for the development of audit practices and the introduction of internationally accepted auditing standards.
Within the Contact Committee of the Heads of the EU candidate country SAIs and the ECA , the Bulgarian NAO received extremely effective and crucial support in methodological and practical way for the development of audit practices and the introduction of internationally accepted auditing standards.
- it is very important that the reports and the opinions of the Audit Office are materially accurate, based on adequate, relevant and reliable information and at the same time they are understandable;
- it is very important that the reports and the opinions of the Audit Office are materially accurate , based on adequate, relevant and reliable information and at the same time they are understandable;
In his speech at the ECOFIN Council, Brussels, 7 November, 2006, Mr. Hubert Weber, President of the European Court of Auditors said that “the Court remains committed to continuing its close cooperation with the national audit bodies of the European Union.
In his speech at the ECOFIN Council, Brussels, 7 November, 2006, Mr. Hubert Weber, President of the European Court of Auditors said that “the Court remains committed to continuing its close cooperation with the national audit bodies of the European Union.
Nadežda Sandolova nimetamine kontrollikoja liikmeks
Nomination of Nadezhda Sandolava as a Member of the Court of Auditors
Ovidiu Ispiri nimetamine kontrollikoja liikmeks
on the nomination of Ovidiu Ispir as a Member of the Court of Auditors
LISA 1: OVIDIU ISPIRI ELULOOKIRJELDUS........................................................................5
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF OVIDIU ISPIR...........................................................4
LISA 2: OVIDIU ISPIRI VASTUSED KÜSIMUSTIKULE......................................................11
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF OVIDIU ISPIR TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE...................................9
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 247 lõiget 3 ja EURATOMi asutamislepingu artikli 160b lõiget 3, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris Euroopa Parlamendiga ( C6-0410/2006 );
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0410/2006 ),
– võttes arvesse eelarvekontrollikomisjoni raportit ( A6-0443/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0443/2006 ),
LISA 1: OVIDIU ISPIRI ELULOOKIRJELDUS
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF OVIDIU ISPIR
Internal Control of Public Entities; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Internal Control of Public Entities; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS. Public Reports of SAI; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS. Public Reports of SAI; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS. SAI Basic Activities; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS. SAI Basic Activities; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS. Independence and Accountability – SAI Defining Elements; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS. Independence and Accountability – SAI Defining Elements; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
External public audit in EU MS; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Credit Spending Entities Management Discharge – a Contradictory Issue; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no. /2004; “The Economic Tribune” Magazine no.
Credit Spending Entities Management Discharge – a Contradictory Issue; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no. /2004; “The Economic Tribune” Magazine no.
Strengthening Accountability for Public Money Management; “The Economic Tribune” Magazine no.
Strengthening Accountability for Public Money Management; “The Economic Tribune” Magazine no.
Public Entities Auditing Organization; “Finances Banks Insurance” Magazine no.
Public Entities Auditing Organization; “Finances Banks Insurance” Magazine no.
Internal Control of Public Entities Activities; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Internal Control of Public Entities Activities; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Financial Control Documents Capitalization; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Financial Control Documents Capitalization; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Control Documents Established by the Financial Controllers of the Court of Accounts; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Control Documents Established by the Financial Controllers of the Court of Accounts; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Control Objectives of the Court of Accounts on Examining Public Entities Execution Accounts; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
Control Objectives of the Court of Accounts on Examining Public Entities Execution Accounts; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
The Management Financial Control – Where to?; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
The Management Financial Control – Where to?; “Financial Economic Control” Magazine no.
LISA 2: OVIDIU ISPIRI VASTUSED KÜSIMUSTIKULE
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF OVIDIU ISPIR TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Application of adequate reporting systems relating to financial and management results, as well as to the audit activities results.
Application of adequate reporting systems relating to financial and management results, as well as to the audit activities results.
· in articles 139 – 147 of the Financial Regulation No. 1605/2002 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
· in articles 139 – 147 of the Financial Regulation No. 1605/2002 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Art. 248 [3] of the Treaty establishing the European Community stipulates that the audit carried out by the European Court of Auditors in the Member States shall be in cooperation with the supreme audit institutions.
Art. 248 [3] of the Treaty establishing the European Community stipulates that the audit carried out by the European Court of Auditors in the Member States shall be in cooperation with the supreme audit institutions.
Ovidiu Ispiri nimetamine kontrollikoja liikmeks
Nomination of Ovidiu Ispir as a Member of the Court of Auditors
CONT 29.11.2006
CONT 29.11.2005
Märkused (andmed on kättesaadavad ainult ühes keeles)
Comment (available in one language only)
Euroopa Liidu 2006. eelarveaasta paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 projekt
on Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006
Euroopa Liidu 2006. eelarveaasta paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 projekt, III jagu – Komisjon
on Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III – Commission
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu 2006. eelarveaasta üldeelarvet, mis võeti lõplikult vastu 15. detsembril 2005
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, as finally adopted on 15 December 2005
Kokkulepet muudeti Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsusega 2005/708/EÜ (ELT L 269, 14.10.2005, lk 24). ;
Agreement as last amended by Decision 2005/708/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 269, 14.10.2005, p.
– võttes arvesse nõukogu poolt 30. novembril 2006 koostatud paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 projekti (15635/2006 – C6‑0441/2006 );
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 6/2006, which the Council established on 30 November 2006 (15635/2006 – C6‑0441/2006 ),
– võttes arvesse eelarvekomisjoni raportit ( A6‑0444/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0444/2006 ),
A. arvestades, et paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 eesmärk on kirjutada eelarvesse sisse prognoositud tulude tõus ja maksete assigneeringute vähenemine rubriikide 1, 2 ja 7 eelarveridadel, samuti artikli 1 1 1 märkuste muutmine seoses suhkru ladustamisega ja artikli 13 03 08 märkuste muutmine;
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 6/2006 aims at budgeting an increase in the forecast of revenue and a decrease in payment appropriations in the budget lines for Headings 1, 2 and 7, as well as modifying the remarks of budget Article 1 1 1 concerning sugar storage and of Article 13 03 08,
B. arvestades, et prognoositavate tulude suurenemine 2,667 miljardi euro suuruses summas ja maksete assigneeringute vähenemine 4,706 miljardi euro võrra on üsna märkimisväärne;
B. whereas the increase in the forecast of revenue of EUR 2 667 million and the decrease in payment appropriations of EUR 4 706 million are quite substantial,
C. arvestades, et paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 vastuvõtmine toob seega kaasa liikmesriikide osamaksete vähenemise 2006. aastal kokku 7,373 miljardi euro võrra;
C. whereas an adoption of Amending Budget No 6/2006 will thus result in the Member States' contributions for 2006 decreasing by a total of EUR 7 373 million,
D. arvestades, et tulude korrapärast ja süsteemset alahindamist koos kõigi sellega kaasnevate mõjudega tuleks lugeda täiendavat kontrolli väärivaks küsimuseks;
D. whereas the regular and systematic underestimation of revenue with all its effects should be considered as an issue deserving further scrutiny,
E. arvestades, et iga-aastase eelarvemenetluse käigus heaks kiidetud maksete täitmise madal tase on jätkuvalt murettekitav teema;
E. whereas the low level of implementation of payments that were adopted in the annual budgetary procedure remains a constant cause for concern,
F. arvestades, et mõlemad eelarvepädevad institutsioonid on jõudnud 2007. aasta eelarve, sealhulgas maksete taseme osas kokkuleppele;
F. whereas the two arms of the budgetary authority have come to an agreement on the Budget for 2007, including the level of payments,
G. arvestades, et paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 on mõju tõttu, mida ta 2007. aasta eelarve maksete tasemele avaldab, sellesse kokkuleppesse kaasatud,
G. whereas Amending Budget No 6/2006, due to its effects on the level of payments in the Budget for 2007, has been included in this agreement,
Paranduseelarve esialgne projekt
Preliminary Draft Amending Budget
Komisjon esitas 31. oktoobril 2006. aasta paranduseelarve nr 6 esialgse projekti ja 17. novembril vastava õiendi eesmärgiga
On 31 October, the Commission presented Preliminary Draft Amending Budget (PDAB) No 6 for the year 2006, and on 17 November, an Amending Letter to it, aiming at
1. kanda eelarvesse prognoositud tulu märkimisväärne kasv 2,667 miljardit eurot;
1. budgeting a substantial increase in the forecast of revenue of EUR 2 667 million
2. vähendada rubriikide 1, 2 ja 7 eelarveridade maksete assigneeringuid 4,706 miljardi euro võrra;
2. decreasing payment appropriations in budget lines for Heading 1, 2 and 7 by EUR 4 706 million
3. teha ettepanek muuta eelarve artikli 1 1 1 märkusi seoses suhkru ladustamisega, samuti artikli 13 03 08 - Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi meetmete lõpuleviimine – Tehniline abi ja uuendusmeetmed – märkusi.
3. proposing the modification of the remarks of budget article 1 1 1 concerning the sugar storage, as well as of article 13 03 08 – European Development Fund (ERDF), Technical assistance and innovative measures.
Prognoositud tulude kasv (vt punkt 1) tuleneb uuest ajakohastamisest ja tähendab seda, et liikmesriigid võivad sellele vastavalt vähendada oma osamakseid 2006. aasta eelarvesse, s.t 2,667 miljardi euro võrra.
The increase in the forecast of revenue (see point 1 above) is the result of new updates and means that the Member States can reduce their contributions to the 2006 budget accordingly, i.e. by EUR 2 667 million.
Kui see summa lisada maksete assigneeringute otsesele vähendamisele 4,706 miljardi euro võrra (vt punkt 2), kahaneksid liikmesriikide osamaksed 2006. aasta eelarvesse kokku 7,373 miljardi euro võrra.
If this amount is added to the straight forward decrease in payment appropriations of EUR 4 706 million (see point 2 above), Member States' contributions for 2006 would decrease by a total of EUR 7 373 million.
Komisjoni ettepaneku esmase hindamise järel tuli raportöör järeldusele, et vähemalt osa 2006. aastal tegemata jäänud maksetest (s.t ligi 5 miljardi euro suuruses summas) tuleb suure tõenäosusega maksta välja 2007. aastal.
After his first evaluation of the Commission's proposal, your rapporteur came to the conclusion that at least part of the payments not implemented in 2006 (i.e. a sum of nearly EUR 5 billion) would, most likely, have to be served in 2007.
Seetõttu arvas raportöör, et seda paranduseelarvet ei saa käsitleda eraldiseisva küsimusena 2006. aasta eelarve raames.
This is why your rapporteur did not feel to be in a position to treat this Amending Budget as an isolated matter within the framework of Budget 2006.
Raportööri hinnangul tuli seda 2007. aasta maksete taseme määramisel arvestada.
For him it had to be taken into account when setting the level of payments for 2007.
Seetõttu pandi paranduseelarve nr 6 2007. aasta eelarve lepitusmenetluse päevakorda, et saavutada järjekindel ja kõikehõlmav kokkulepe.
Consequently, Amending Budget No 6 was put on the agenda of the Conciliation for Budget 2007 in order to achieve a consistent and comprehensive agreement.
Pärast nõukoguga 2007. aasta eelarve osas sõlmitud lõplikku kokkulepet, sealhulgas maksete taseme osas, võib raportöör nüüd soovitada paranduseelarve nr 6 vastuvõtmist.
Following the final agreement with Council on Budget 2007, including the level of payments, your rapporteur is now in a position to recommend adoption of Amending Budget No 6.
Raportöör tahab siiski rõhutada komisjoni kohustust maksete teostamisel, nii nagu eelarvepädevad institutsioonid iga-aastase eelarvemenetluse raames kokku on leppinud.
However, he still wants to underline the Commission's responsibility in implementing the payments as agreed by the budgetary authority within the framework of the annual budgetary procedure.
Maksete assigneeringute vähendamine eelarveaasta lõpus võib olla õigustatud ainult ettenägematute asjaoludega ning peaks lõplikult muutuma reegli erandiks ja mitte reegliks, nagu see praegu tundub olevat.
Decreasing payment appropriations at the end of the budgetary year can only be justified by unforeseen circumstances and should, once and for all, become an exemption to the rule rather than the "rule" it seems to be at the moment.
Euroopa Liidu 2006. eelarveaasta paranduseelarve nr 6/2006 projekt, III jagu – Komisjon
Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III - Commission
nr 6/2006 – SEK(2006)1410
No 6/2006 – SEC(2006)1410
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht, eesmärgiga võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 999/2001, millega sätestatakse teatavate transmissiivsete spongioossete entsefalopaatiate vältimise, kontrolli ja likvideerimise eeskirjad
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
nõukogu ühise seisukoha kohta, eesmärgiga võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 999/2001, millega sätestatakse teatavate transmissiivsete spongioossete entsefalopaatiate vältimise, kontrolli ja likvideerimise eeskirjad
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
– võttes arvesse nõukogu ühist seisukohta (14224/4/2006 – C6‑0432/2006 );
– having regard to the Council common position (14224/4/2006 – C6‑0432/2006 ),
ELTs seni avaldamata. kohta;
Not yet published in OJ ,
– võttes arvesse keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjoni soovitust teisele lugemisele ( A6‑0445/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0445/2006 ),
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht, eesmärgiga võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 999/2001, millega sätestatakse teatavate transmissiivsete spongioossete entsefalopaatiate vältimise, kontrolli ja likvideerimise eeskirjad
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
Lepituskomitees heakskiidetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ühine tekst, mis käsitleb põhjavee kaitset reostuse ja seisundi halvenemise eest
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration
lepituskomitees heakskiidetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ühise teksti kohta, mis käsitleb põhjavee kaitset reostuse ja seisundi halvenemise eest
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration
– võttes arvesse lepituskomitees heaks kiidetud ühist teksti (PE-CONS 3658/2006 – C6‑0382/2006 );
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3658/2006 – C6‑0382/2006 ),
ELT C 45 E, 23.2.2006, lk 15.
OJ C 45 E, 23.2.2006, p.
Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule esitatud komisjoni ettepaneku ( KOM(2003)0550 )
15. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0550 )
ELTs seni avaldamata. suhtes ning komisjoni muudetud ettepanekut ( KOM(2005)0282 );
Not yet published in OJ. and on the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0282 ),
Vastuvõetud tekstid, 13.6.2006, P6_TA(2006)0251 . nõukogu ühise seisukoha suhtes
Texts Adopted, 13.6.2006, P6_TA(2006)0251 . on the Council common position
– võttes arvesse komisjoni arvamust Euroopa Parlamendi poolt ühise seisukoha suhtes esitatud muudatusettepanekute kohta ( KOM(2006)0434 )
– having regard to the Commission’s opinion on Parliament’s amendments to the common position ( COM(2006)0434 )
– võttes arvesse lepituskomitees osaleva Euroopa Parlamendi delegatsiooni raportit ( A6‑0446/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0446/2006 ),
3. teeb peasekretärile ülesandeks allkirjastada õigusakt pärast kõikide menetluste nõuetekohase läbiviimise kontrollimist ja korraldada kokkuleppel nõukogu peasekretäriga selle avaldamine Euroopa Liidu Teatajas;
Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
Põhjavesi on oluline loodusvara, kuna see kujutab endast reservuaari, millest saadakse heakvaliteedilist vett joogiveega varustamiseks ning kasutamiseks tööstuses ja põllumajanduses.
Groundwater is an important natural resource, forming a reservoir from which high-quality water is obtained for use as drinking water and in industry and agriculture.
Põhjavee kaitset reostuse eest reguleerivad põhjavee direktiiv nr 80/68/EMÜ ja vee raamdirektiiv nr 2000/60/EÜ.
The Groundwater Directive (80/68/EEC) and the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) both contain provisions on the protection of groundwater against pollution.
1980. aasta põhjavee direktiiv tuleb 2013. aastal kehtetuks tunnistada, sest vee raamdirektiiv sisaldab ka kõiki peamisi põhjavee kaitseks kehtestatud nõudeid, v.a. kaks erandit.
However, the 1980 Groundwater Directive is to be repealed in 2013, since, with two exceptions, the Water Framework Directive also covers the key requirements for the protection of groundwater.
Euroopa Komisjon esitas 19. septembril 2003 ettepaneku võtta vastu direktiiv põhjavee kaitseks reostuse eest, nagu seda näeb ette vee raamdirektiivi artikkel 17.
On 19 September 2003 the European Commission presented a proposal for a directive on the protection of groundwater against pollution, as called for in Article 17 of the Water Framework Directive.
Ettepanekus määratletakse põhjavee keemilise seisundi hindamise ning oluliste ja jätkuvate kasvutendentside väljaselgitamise, samuti ka tendentsimuutuse nulljoone kindlaks määramise kriteeriumid ja menetlus, ning nähakse ette meetmed saasteainete põhjavette viimise piiramiseks või ärahoidmiseks.
The proposal for a directive lays down criteria and procedures to be used in assessing the chemical status of groundwater, identifying significant and sustained upward trends and defining starting points for trend reversals and provides for measures to prevent or restrict inputs of pollutants into groundwater.
Parlamendis 28. aprillil 2005 toimunud esimese lugemise järel võttis nõukogu 23. jaanuaril 2006 vastu ühise seisukoha.
Following Parliament’s first reading of 28 April 2005, the Council adopted its Common Position on 23 January 2006.
Euroopa Parlamendi arvates ei ole see sobiv vahend selge, sihikindla ja piisava Euroopa põhjavett kaitsva reeglistiku välja kujundamiseks.
Parliament did not regard that text as a suitable means of establishing a clear, effective and adequate set of rules on the protection of groundwater in Europe.