natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See, for example, the reports drawn up by a private consultant containing an ex post assessment of the implementation of Decision 2001/431 and an analysis of the information on the inventory and utilisation of control means forwarded by the Member States in relation to Decision 2001/431 (FISH/2002/12 and FISH/2002/10, submitted in November 2003). , the financial scheme established by earlier decisions on this subject has been a contributing factor in ensuring that the Member States have strengthened their structures, equipment and information, inspection and control techniques, and have improved their inspectors' skills.
See, for example, the reports drawn up by a private consultant containing an ex post assessment of the implementation of Decision 2001/431 and an analysis of the information on the inventory and utilisation of control means forwarded by the Member States in relation to Decision 2001/431 (FISH/2002/12 and FISH/2002/10, submitted in November 2003). , the financial scheme established by earlier decisions on this subject has been a contributing factor in ensuring that the Member States have strengthened their structures, equipment and information, inspection and control techniques, and have improved their inspectors' skills.
All the studies carried out nevertheless show that many shortcomings and imbalances remain with regard to the level of capacities in the various Member States.
All the studies carried out nevertheless show that many shortcomings and imbalances remain with regard to the level of capacities in the various Member States.
The recent communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on behaviours which seriously infringed the rules of the CFP in 2003
The recent communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on behaviours which seriously infringed the rules of the CFP in 2003
COM(2005)0207 final. shows that, despite the progress achieved, all the measures necessary to combat behaviour which infringes the rules of the common fisheries policy have not yet been taken.
COM(2005)0207 final. shows that, despite the progress achieved, all the measures necessary to combat behaviour which infringes the rules of the common fisheries policy have not yet been taken.
In order to ensure that the Member States comply with their obligations under CFP rules, it is therefore essential that the Community should continue to support their control-related investment.
In order to ensure that the Member States comply with their obligations under CFP rules, it is therefore essential that the Community should continue to support their control-related investment.
The rapporteur nevertheless considers it desirable to table a number of amendments to the proposal under review.
The rapporteur nevertheless considers it desirable to table a number of amendments to the proposal under review.
As regards the dates by which the Member States must submit their annual fisheries control programmes , the aim is to correct an apparent translation error in the Portuguese version, and possibly in other language versions too, and to avoid creating retroactive obligations by adapting the dates to the current procedure.
As regards the dates by which the Member States must submit their annual fisheries control programmes , the aim is to correct an apparent translation error in the Portuguese version, and possibly in other language versions too, and to avoid creating retroactive obligations by adapting the dates to the current procedure.
The rapporteur fully agrees with the need to finance administrative agreements with the Joint Research Centre aimed at implementing new technologies in the area of control and recognises the importance of carrying out studies on control-related areas at the Commission's initiative.
The rapporteur fully agrees with the need to finance administrative agreements with the Joint Research Centre aimed at implementing new technologies in the area of control and recognises the importance of carrying out studies on control-related areas at the Commission's initiative.
Nevertheless, he takes the view that it is not appropriate to insert these two actions within the field covered by the present proposal for a decision.
Nevertheless, he takes the view that it is not appropriate to insert these two actions within the field covered by the present proposal for a decision.
This proposal relates to a 'Community financial contribution towards Member States' fisheries control programmes' and not to the Commission's internal expenditure on studies or the Joint Research Centre.
This proposal relates to a 'Community financial contribution towards Member States' fisheries control programmes' and not to the Commission's internal expenditure on studies or the Joint Research Centre.
This expenditure should be included in a budget line which covers the Commission's spending, specifically the item relating to the collection of basic data and scientific advice (item 11.07.01) or the item relating to inspections (11.07.03).
This expenditure should be included in a budget line which covers the Commission's spending, specifically the item relating to the collection of basic data and scientific advice (item 11.07.01) or the item relating to inspections (11.07.03).
Parliament should support any Commission proposal for a budget transfer aimed at financing actions covered by these two items in its proposal.
Parliament should support any Commission proposal for a budget transfer aimed at financing actions covered by these two items in its proposal.
In its recent proposal for a Council regulation establishing Community financial measures for the implementation of the common fisheries policy and in the area of the law of the sea
In its recent proposal for a Council regulation establishing Community financial measures for the implementation of the common fisheries policy and in the area of the law of the sea
COM(2005)0117 final. , the Commission itself confirms the rapporteur's position in this respect, given that it establishes a clear separation between 'expenditure incurred by Member States in implementing the monitoring and control systems applicable to the CFP' (Article 8(a)) and 'expenditure relating to administrative arrangements with the Joint Research Centre, or any other Community consultative body, to analyse the implementation of new technologies' (Article 8(b) of the above proposal).
COM(2005)0117 final. , the Commission itself confirms the rapporteur's position in this respect, given that it establishes a clear separation between 'expenditure incurred by Member States in implementing the monitoring and control systems applicable to the CFP' (Article 8(a)) and 'expenditure relating to administrative arrangements with the Joint Research Centre, or any other Community consultative body, to analyse the implementation of new technologies' (Article 8(b) of the above proposal).
At all events, the financial reference amount for the Community's contribution referred to in Article 1(3) of the proposal under review should be maintained and granted to projects linked to the type of measures currently covered by Article 4(1)(a) to (h) of Council Decision 2004/465/EC.
At all events, the financial reference amount for the Community's contribution referred to in Article 1(3) of the proposal under review should be maintained and granted to projects linked to the type of measures currently covered by Article 4(1)(a) to (h) of Council Decision 2004/465/EC.
There is no point in allocating part of this overall annual amount of EUR 35 million to the Commission's internal expenditure at a time when we are facing additional financial pressures stemming from enlargement, when a large number of weaknesses remain as regards controls by the Member States and when new challenges are arising in the field of control, such as those stemming from the new rules on the electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and means of remote sensing.
There is no point in allocating part of this overall annual amount of EUR 35 million to the Commission's internal expenditure at a time when we are facing additional financial pressures stemming from enlargement, when a large number of weaknesses remain as regards controls by the Member States and when new challenges are arising in the field of control, such as those stemming from the new rules on the electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and means of remote sensing.
Your rapporteur would also point out that this annual amount has remained unchanged for five years, and has indeed been reduced by comparison with the total annual amounts set aside for the Community's financial contribution for the period from 1996 to 2000 in Decision 95/527/EEC.
Your rapporteur would also point out that this annual amount has remained unchanged for five years, and has indeed been reduced by comparison with the total annual amounts set aside for the Community's financial contribution for the period from 1996 to 2000 in Decision 95/527/EEC.
A further amendment tabled by the rapporteur includes the definition of a set of objective criteria which should determine the Commission's decisions where the appropriations available are not sufficient to finance all the contributions required by the annual programmes submitted by the Member States.
A further amendment tabled by the rapporteur includes the definition of a set of objective criteria which should determine the Commission's decisions where the appropriations available are not sufficient to finance all the contributions required by the annual programmes submitted by the Member States.
The rapporteur takes the view that account should be taken of shortcomings in existing control systems, the size of Exclusive Economic Zones and the number of fishermen subject to controls .
The rapporteur takes the view that account should be taken of shortcomings in existing control systems, the size of Exclusive Economic Zones and the number of fishermen subject to controls .
The Commission has also stated that the main reason why the new Member States have made little use of Community funding in their control programmes is the high national contribution.
The Commission has also stated that the main reason why the new Member States have made little use of Community funding in their control programmes is the high national contribution.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the rate of the Community financial contribution should be raised (a maximum of 75% rather than 50%) for a specific type of action: the purchase and modernisation of vessels and aircraft used for inspection and surveillance of fisheries activities by the competent authorities .
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the rate of the Community financial contribution should be raised (a maximum of 75% rather than 50%) for a specific type of action: the purchase and modernisation of vessels and aircraft used for inspection and surveillance of fisheries activities by the competent authorities .
These measures account for the largest amount of spending by far, in particular owing to the cost of each unit, and the rapporteur considers it important that support for vessels and for the remaining Member States should be increased in this respect.
These measures account for the largest amount of spending by far, in particular owing to the cost of each unit, and the rapporteur considers it important that support for vessels and for the remaining Member States should be increased in this respect.
The rapporteur further recommends that the Commission should draw up a report for the Council and Parliament by the end of 2006 at the latest providing an interim assessment of the application of this system .
The rapporteur further recommends that the Commission should draw up a report for the Council and Parliament by the end of 2006 at the latest providing an interim assessment of the application of this system .
It does not appear advisable to wait until mid-2008 for such an assessment, especially since the Member States are obliged to forward a whole series of data to the Commission on an annual basis, which should be interpreted and made available in a simplified form so that a timely assessment can be made.
It does not appear advisable to wait until mid-2008 for such an assessment, especially since the Member States are obliged to forward a whole series of data to the Commission on an annual basis, which should be interpreted and made available in a simplified form so that a timely assessment can be made.
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu otsus, millega muudetakse otsust 2004/465/EÜ ühenduse rahalise toetuse kohta liikmesriikide kalanduse kontrolli programmidele
Proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2004/465/EC on a Community financial contribution towards Member States fisheries control programmes
Paulo Casaca30.8.2005
Paulo Casaca 30.8.2005
Lihtsustatud menetlus – otsuse kuupäev
Simplified procedure – date of decision Date of decision
Konsulteerimine Euroopa majandus- ja sotsiaalkomiteega – istungil otsuse tegemise kuupäev
Parliament to consult European Economic and Social Committee – date decided in plenary
Konsulteerimine regioonide komiteega – istungil otsusetegemise kuupäev
Parliament to consult Committee of the Regions – date decided in plenary
Bulgaaria valmisolek ELiga ühinemiseks
on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria
EUROOPA PARLAMENDI RESOLUTSIOONI ETTEPANEK................................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................2
Bulgaaria valmisoleku kohta ELiga ühinemiseks
on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria
– võttes arvesse 25. aprillil 2005. aastal allkirjastatud Bulgaaria Vabariigi ja Rumeenia ühinemislepingut Euroopa Liiduga;
– having regard to the Treaty of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, signed on 25 April 2005,
– võttes arvesse oma asjaomaseid resolutsioone ja raporteid, mis on välja antud alates ühinemisläbirääkimiste algusest;
– having regard to its relevant resolutions and reports since the beginning of the accession negotiations,
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Ülemkogu 16.–17. detsembri 2004. aasta Brüsseli kohtumise eesistujariigi järeldusi;
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 16-17 December 2004,
– võttes arvesse komisjoni 2005. aasta üldist seirearuannet Bulgaaria kohta ( KOM(2005)0534 );
– having regard to the Commission's 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report for Bulgaria ( COM(2005)0534 ),
– võttes arvesse ELi voliniku Olli Rehni 7. novembri 2005. aasta kirja Bulgaaria valitsusele;
– having regard to the letter of EU Commissioner Olli Rehn to the Bulgarian government of 7 November 2005,
– võttes arvesse väliskomisjoni raportit ( A6-0342/2005 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0342/2005 ),
A. arvestades, et pärast ühinemisläbirääkimiste lõpetamist 14. detsembril 2004. aastal kirjutas Bulgaaria ühinemislepingule alla 25. aprillil 2005. aastal ja ratifitseeris selle 11. mail 2005. aastal;
A. whereas, following the closure of accession negotiations on 14 December 2004, Bulgaria signed the Accession Treaty on 25 April 2005 and ratified it on 11 May 2005,
B. arvestades, et Bulgaaria liigub jätkuvalt liikmesusega seotud kohustuste õigeaegse täitmise suunas, et saavutada meie ühine eesmärk ja ühineda ELiga 1. jaanuaril 2007. aastal, mil kõik ühinemislepingus sätestatud tingimused peavad olema täidetud;
B. whereas Bulgaria remains on course to assume the obligations for membership in time to meet our common objective of her accession to the EU on 1 January 2007 , by which time she must have fulfilled the conditions laid down in the Treaty of Accession,
C. arvestades, et Euroopa Parlament on korduvalt rõhutanud, et Bulgaaria ühinemine peaks sõltuma üksnes riigi enda saavutustest ja seda ei tohiks siduda ühegi muu riigi kandideerimisega ning seda ei tohiks kahjustada asjasse mittepuutuvad ELi tulevase laienemisega seotud probleemid; väljendab sellele vaatamata jätkuvalt lootust selle üle, et Rumeenia ja Bulgaaria ühinemine saab toimuma samal ajal,
C. whereas, as the European Parliament has repeatedly emphasised, the accession of Bulgaria should depend exclusively on its own merits and should not be linked to the candidacy of any other country or indeed be disadvantaged by unrelated concerns about the course of future EU enlargement; nevertheless expresses its continued hope that the accession of Romania and Bulgaria will be able to take place at the same time,
6. tervitab 18 Bulgaaria parlamendi vaatleja saabumist Euroopa Parlamenti ja loodab, et jätkub Euroopa Parlamendi, komisjoni ja nõukogu vaheline viljakas koostöö Bulgaaria ELiga ühinemise edusamme puudutavate otsuste osas;
Welcomes the arrival of 18 Bulgarian Parliamentary Observers to the European Parliament and looks forward to continuing the fruitful cooperation between Parliament, Commission and Council in decisions relating to Bulgaria's progress towards EU membership;
8. tunnustab Bulgaaria märkimisväärset panust laiema Kagu-Euroopa piirkonna stabiilsusesse ja riigi jätkuvat rolli piirkonna turvalisuse ja jõukuse edendamisel;
Recognises Bulgaria's significant contribution to the stability of the wider south-east European region and her continuing role in the promotion of regional security and prosperity;
10. toetab igati arusaama, mille kohaselt on õigusriigi põhimõtted üldsuse usalduse jaoks hädavajalikud ning on ühtlasi majandusarengu ja sellest tulenevalt suurema jõukuse aluseks;
Strongly endorses the view that the rule of law is vital to the establishment of public trust and confidence and also provides the foundation for economic progress and therefore greater prosperity;
14. julgustab kõrgeid ametnikke oma pühendumuse märgiks avalikult lahti ütlema igasugust liiki korruptsioonist; soovitab tungivalt kõrgetel ametnikel toetada õigusakte, mis nõuavad ametnike isiklike varade ja tulude deklaratsioonide avalikustamist;
Encourages high-level officials, as a sign of their commitment, to distance themselves publicly from all kinds of corruption; strongly encourages high-level officials to support regulations demanding the disclosure of their personal assets and income-tax declarations;
18. nõuab, et suunataks rohkem vahendeid lastekodude ja erivajadustega, sealhulgas puudega laste koolide olukorra parandamiseks ning deinstitutsionaliseerimise kava kiiremaks ja tõhusamaks rakendamiseks, arvestades hooldeasutustes elavate laste kõrget osakaalu Bulgaarias; palub komisjonil läbi viia põhjalik uurimine hooldekodudes elavate puuetega inimeste olukorra kohta ning teostada vastavat järelevalvet; julgustab tegema muudatusi lapsendamisseaduses ja -praktikas, et vähendada rahvusvaheliselt lapsendatud Bulgaaria laste arvu ja edendada riigisisest lapsendamist, sealhulgas looma võimalike lapsendajate ühtset riiklikku registrit ning edendama rahvusvahelise parima tava kohast perekonnas hooldamist; nõuab psühhiaatrilise abi reformimise jätkumist; nõuab tungivalt alaealistele mõeldud kohtusüsteemi sisseviimist, mida toetavad asjakohased struktuurid ja majutusvõimalused;
Calls for more resources to be directed to improvement of orphanages and schools for disadvantaged children and those with special needs, including disabled persons, and to more rapid and effective implementation of the deinstitutionalisation plan, given that Bulgaria has a relatively high percentage of children in care; requests the Commission to undertake research and monitoring on the status of disabled persons living in residential institutions; wishes to encourage changes in the law and practice of adoption to reduce further the number of Bulgarian children adopted internationally and to promote national adoption including establishment of a unified national register for potential adopters, as well as encouraging foster care in line with international best practice; calls for continued reform of psychiatric care; urges also the establishment of a juvenile court system backed by appropriate structures and accommodation;
22. tervitab komisjoni otsust Bulgaaria erastamisprogrammi positiivse mõju kohta; märgib, et erasektori osakaal SKT-st jõudis 2005. aasta esimesel poolel 67%ni, mis tähendab võrreldes 2004. aasta esimese poolega 2,2%st tõusu; nõuab riigihangete, pakkumiste ja väljastpoolt töö tellimiste läbiviimisel suuremat läbipaistvust;
Welcomes the Commission's verdict on the positive effects of the privatisation programme in Bulgaria; notes that the share of the private sector reached 67% of GDP in the first half of 2005, an increase of 2.2% from the same period in 2004; calls for greater transparency in the processes of public procurement, tendering and contracting;
25. tuletab Bulgaariale meelde, et nagu märgiti Bulgaariat käsitlevas üldises seirearuandes, peab riik suurendama jõupingutusi siseturu kõikides valdkondades, et tagada selle tõhus toimimine;
Reminds Bulgaria that it needs to make increased efforts in all areas of the internal market, as pointed out in the latest Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Bulgaria, so as to guarantee its effective functioning;
Ühenduse õigustik
Acquis communautaire
28. rõhutab, et ühinemiseelse abi haldamist ja järelevalvet tuleb oluliselt parandada, et valmistada Bulgaariat ette ELi struktuurifondide tõhusamaks kasutamiseks; eelkõige tuleb kiirendada jõupingutusi Phare ja ISPAga seotud laiendatud detsentraliseeritud rakendussüsteemi akrediteerimiseks; komisjon peaks samas suunama edasise abi valdkondadesse, kus seda kõige rohkem vajatakse;
Stresses that the management and control of pre-accession assistance must be substantially enhanced in order to prepare Bulgaria for more efficient use of EU Structural Funds; in particular, efforts to accredit the Phare- and ISPA-related Extended Decentralised Implementation System must be accelerated; at the same time the Commission should target further assistance into those areas of greatest need;
Bulgaaria valmisolek ELiga ühinemiseks
State of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria
Nõukogu ühine seisukoht eesmärgiga võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv, mis käsitleb energia lõpptarbimise tõhusust ja energiateenuseid ning millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks nõukogu direktiiv 93/76/EMÜ
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................34
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
– võttes arvesse nõukogu ühist seisukohta (10721/3/2005 – C6‑0298/2005 );
– having regard to the Council common position (10721/3/2005 – C6‑0298/2005 ),
Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule esitatud komisjoni ettepaneku ( KOM(2003)0739 )
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0739 )
– võttes arvesse tööstuse, teadusuuringute ja energeetikakomisjoni soovitust teisele lugemisele ( A6‑0343/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0343/2005 ),
(Reinstates Amendment 2 at first reading, adopted on 7 June 2005)
(Reinstates Amendment 2 at first reading, adopted on 7 June 2005)
(3 a) Eesmärgiks seatud energia säästmise määrad ei too endaga automaatselt kaasa energiatarbimise vähenemist liikmesriikides või ELi tasandil ega võimalda automaatselt saavutada eesmärki vältida ohtlikku kliimamuutust.
(3a) The proposed targets for energy savings do not automatically lead to reduction in energy consumption in every Member State or at EU level, and therefore do not automatically achieve the general objective of preventing dangerous climate change.
(7 a) Seega ei ole käesoleva direktiivi eesmärk edaspidi edendada mitte ainult energiateenuste pakkumiste poolt, vaid luua tugevamaid stiimuleid ka nõudluse poole jaoks.
(7a) The aim of this Directive is thus not only to continue to promote the supply side of energy services, but also to create stronger incentives for the demand side.