natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b a) andmed Equal programmi seniste põhimõtete süvalaiendamise kohta.
ba) information on the mainstreaming of the existing principles of the EQUAL programme.
Artikli 36 lõike 3 kolmanda lõigu punkt b
Article 36, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3, point (b)
b) laiem mõju Euroopa tööhõivestrateegia põhilistele prioriteetidele ja eesmärkidele ja ühenduse eesmärkidele sotsiaalse hõlvatuse valdkonnas.
b) the leverage effect on the key priorities and goals of the European Employment Strategy and on the goals of the Community in the sphere of social inclusion.
b) laiem mõju Euroopa tööhõivestrateegia põhilistele prioriteetidele ja eesmärkidele ja ühenduse eesmärkidele sotsiaalse hõlvatuse , migrantide integratsiooni, sotsiaalse ühtekuuluvuse ning meeste ja naiste vahelise võrdsuse valdkonnas.
b) the leverage effect on the key priorities and goals of the European Employment Strategy and on the goals of the Community in the sphere of social inclusion , the social integration of migrants, social cohesion, equality between men and women and the most vulnerable sectors of the population .
Artikli 36 lõike 3 kolmanda lõigu punkt b a (uus)
Article 36, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3, point (b a) (new)
Artikli 36 lõike 4 punkt b
Article 36, paragraph 4, point (b)
b) linnaküsimustele lähenemist käsitlev teave, sealhulgas välja valitud linnade loetelu ja menetlused volituste võimalikuks edasidelegeerimiseks linnavalitsustele üldise toetuse kaudu;
b) information on the approach to the urban issue , including the list of cities chosen and the procedures for sub-delegation to urban authorities, possibly by means of a global grant;
b) linnade säästvale arengule suunatud meetmed , sealhulgas välja valitud linnade loetelu ja menetlused volituste võimalikuks edasidelegeerimiseks linnavalitsustele üldise toetuse kaudu;
b) measures for the sustainable urban development , including the list of cities chosen and the procedures for sub-delegation to urban authorities, possibly by means of a global grant;
Artikli 36 lõige 4 punkt d a (uus)
Article 36, paragraph 4, point (d a) (new)
d a) andmed Equal programmi seniste põhimõtete süvalaiendamise kohta.
(da) information on the mainstreaming of the existing principles of the EQUAL programme.
Artikli 43 lõige 3 a (uus)
Article 43, paragraph 3 a (new)
Tehnilise abi meetmete kõlblikud on majandus-, ühiskondlikud ja äriorganisatsioonid.
Economic, social or business organisations shall be eligible for the technical assistance measures.
Artikli 44 lõige 1
Article 44, paragraph 1
Liikmesriikide algatusel võidakse fondidest järgmistes piirides rahastada ettevalmistus-, haldus-, järelevalve-, hindamis-, teavitamis- ja kontrollimeetmeid ning meetmeid fondide rakendamiseks vajaliku haldussuutlikkuse tugevdamiseks:
At the initiative of the Member State, for each operational programme, the Funds may finance preparatory, management, monitoring, evaluation, information and control activities and activities to reinforce the administrative capacity for implementing the Funds within the following limits:
Liikmesriikide algatusel võidakse fondidest järgmistes piirides rahastada ettevalmistus-, haldus-, järelevalve-, hindamis-, teavitamis- ja kontrollimeetmeid ning meetmeid fondide rakendamiseks vajaliku haldussuutlikkuse, sealhulgas kodanikuühiskonna osapoolte haldussuutlikkuse tugevdamiseks:
At the initiative of the Member States, for each operational programme, the Funds may finance preparatory, management, monitoring, evaluation, information and control activities and activities to reinforce the administrative capacity, including that of civil society partners, for implementing the funds within the following limits:
Artikli 44 lõige 2 a (uus)
Article 44, paragraph 2 a (new)
Samuti hinnatakse toetuse mõju ühenduse strateegilistele eesmärkidele ja asutamislepingu artiklile 158 ning asjaomaste liikmesriikide ja piirkondade konkreetsetele struktuurilistele probleemidele, võttes arvesse säästva arengu vajadusi ning ühenduse keskkonnamõju ja strateegilist keskkonna hindamist käsitlevat asjaomast seadlusandlust.
They shall also appraise their impact with respect to the strategic objectives of the Community, to Article 158 of the Treaty and to the specific structural problems affecting the Member States and regions concerned, while taking account of the needs of sustainable development and of the relevant Community legislation concerning environmental impact and strategic environmental assessment.
Samuti hinnatakse toetuse mõju ühenduse strateegilistele eesmärkidele ja asutamislepingu artiklile 158 ning asjaomaste liikmesriikide ja piirkondade konkreetsetele struktuurilistele probleemidele, võttes arvesse säästva arengu vajadusi ning ühenduse keskkonnamõju ja strateegilist keskkonna hindamist, samuti puudega isikutele juurdepääsu tagamist käsitlevat asjaomast seadusandlust.
They shall also appraise their impact with respect to the strategic objectives of the Community, to Article 158 of the Treaty and to the specific structural problems affecting the Member States and regions concerned, while taking account of the needs of sustainable development, and of the relevant Community legislation concerning environmental impact and strategic environmental assessment , and accessibility for disabled persons .
Artikli 51 lõige 4
Article 51, paragraph 4
Fondide maksimaalne osalus võib lähenemiseesmärgi ja piirkondliku konkurentsivõime ja tööhõive eesmärgi puhul äärepoolseimates piirkondades ning lähenemiseesmärgi puhul äärealadel asuvatel Kreeka saartel tõusta kuni 85%-ni teostatavate rakenduskavade avaliku sektori kuludest.
The maximum contribution from the Funds shall be increased to 85% of public expenditure for operational programmes under the “Convergence” and the “Regional competitiveness and employment” objectives in the outermost regions and for operational programmes of the outlying Greek islands under the “Convergence” objective.
Fondide maksimaalne osalus võib lähenemiseesmärgi ja piirkondliku konkurentsivõime ja tööhõive eesmärgi puhul äärepoolseimates piirkondades ning lähenemiseesmärgi puhul äärealadel asuvatel Kreeka saartel ning lähenemiseesmärgi tegevuskavade puhul piirkondades, kus sisemajanduse kogutoodang elaniku kohta (mõõdetud ostujõu pariteetides ja arvutatud ühenduse viimase kolme aasta näitajate põhjal) on väiksem kui 60% ühenduse keskmisest, tõusta kuni 85%-ni teostatavate rakenduskavade avaliku sektori kuludest.
The maximum contribution from the Funds shall be increased to 85% of public expenditure for operational programmes under the “Convergence” and the “Regional competitiveness and employment” objectives in the outermost regions , for operational programmes of the outlying Greek islands under the “Convergence” objective and for operational programmes under the "Convergence" objective in the regions where per capita GDP, measured in purchasing power parities and calculated on the basis of Community figures for the last three years is less than 60% of the Community average .
Nõukogu määruse ettepanek, millega nähakse ette üldsätted Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi, Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi ja Ühtekuuluvusfondi kohta
Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
Ettepanek võtta vastu määrus, millega kehtestatakse Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi, Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi ja Ühtekuuluvusfondi üldsätted
on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
Keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjon palub vastutaval regionaalarengukomisjonil lisada oma resolutsiooniettepanekusse järgmised muudatusettepanekud:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. nõustub Euroopa Komisjoni seisukohaga, et on oluline, et fondide, EAFRD ja EFF poolt toetatud tegevused moodustavad osa integreeritud tegevusplaanist;
Agrees with the Commission's view that it is essential that activities supported by the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund, the EAFRD and the EFF form part of an integrated plan of action;
5. kutsub Euroopa Komisjoni ja nõukogu üles tagama, et struktuurifondid ja Ühtekuuluvusfond kaasrahastaksid bioloogiliselt mitmekesiste alade säilitamist, majandamist ja säästvat arengut, et anda Natura 2000 võrgustikule täiendavat toetust seoses põhilise rahastamisvahendiga Life+ programmi raames, mille sätted tuleks asjakohaselt ümber sõnastada; [Artikkel 3];
Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund co-finance the conservation, management and sustainable development of zones with high biodiversity value in order to give additional support to the Natura 2000 network in relation to the basic financial instrument within the Life+ programme whose provisions should be appropriately reformulated; [Article 3]
7. on seisukohal, et tehnilise abi raames peaksid fondid toetama ka struktuurifondidega koostööd tegevate valitsusväliste organisatsioonide suutlikkuse suurendamist [Artikkel 10];
Takes the view that under technical assistance, the Funds should also contribute to increasing the capacity of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) involved in Structural Funds partnerships; [Article 10]
13. leiab, et liikmesriigid peaksid täpsustama riiklike strateegiliste tugiraamistike ja meetmeprogrammide strateegilise keskkonnamõju hindamise (SEA) korra ning tagama õigeaegselt peamiste infrastruktuuriprojektide keskkonnamõju hindamised (EIA); kutsub Euroopa Komisjoni täiendavalt üles tagama, et peamised infrastruktuuriprojektid ei oleks vastuolus keskkonna kaitsmise ja parandamisega [Artiklid 38 – 40];
Considers that Member States should specify the arrangements for the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of national strategic reference frameworks and operational programmes, and ensure timely Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) of the major infrastructure projects; further calls on the Commission to ensure that major infrastructure projects do not conflict with protection and improvement of the environment; [Articles 38 to 40]
18. rõhutab, et eelrahastamise tase on oluline, eriti keskkonna valdkonnas, ja soovitab ühtset 10%-list piirmäära kõikide fondide puhul [Artikli 81 lõige 1];
Underlines that the level of pre-financing is crucial, in particular in the field of environment, and recommends a common 10% ceiling for all funds; [Article 81(1)]
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega kehtestatakse Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi, Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi ja Ühtekuuluvusfondi üldsätted
Proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Danute Budreikaite, Jerzy Buzek, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Caroline Lucas, Renate Sommer, Andres Tarand
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Danutė Budreikaitė, Jerzy Buzek, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Caroline Lucas, Renate Sommer, Andres Tarand
Ettepanek võtta vastu nõukogu määrus, millega kehtestatakse Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi, Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi ja Ühtekuuluvusfondi üldsätted
on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down the general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
The legislative background
The legislative background
The Commission's proposal for general provisions on the European Regional and Development Fund (ERDF), European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Funds forms a general basis for the reform of the structural funds.
The Commission's proposal for general provisions on the European Regional and Development Fund (ERDF), European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Funds forms a general basis for the reform of the structural funds.
The "cohesion legislative package" consists of a Regulation for the European Regional and Development Fund (ERDF)
The "cohesion legislative package" consists of a Regulation for the European Regional and Development Fund (ERDF)
COM(2004)0495 . , a Regulation for the European Social Fund (ESF)
COM(2004)0495 . , a Regulation for the European Social Fund (ESF)
COM(2004)0492 . , a Regulation for the Cohesion fund
COM(2004)0492 . , a Regulation for the Cohesion fund
COM(2004)0494 . , as well a Regulation for creating the framework for a cross-border authority to manage cooperation programmes
COM(2004)0494 . , as well a Regulation for creating the framework for a cross-border authority to manage cooperation programmes
In February 2004, the Commission presented two proposals aiming at an ambitious cohesion policy for the enlarged union of 27 or more.
In February 2004, the Commission presented two proposals aiming at an ambitious cohesion policy for the enlarged union of 27 or more.
Firstly, in the proposal for the financial perspectives of the enlarged European Union of 27 Member States for the period 2007-2013 [ COM(2004)0101 ] an allocation of EUR 336.1 billion (which equates to EUR 373.9 billion before the transfers to the proposed single rural and fisheries instruments) was proposed in support of the three priorities of the reformed cohesion policy.
Firstly, in the proposal for the financial perspectives of the enlarged European Union of 27 Member States for the period 2007-2013 [ COM(2004)0101 ] an allocation of EUR 336.1 billion (which equates to EUR 373.9 billion before the transfers to the proposed single rural and fisheries instruments) was proposed in support of the three priorities of the reformed cohesion policy.
Secondly, the Third cohesion report [ COM(2004)0107 ] presented a proposal for the priorities and delivery system for the new generation programmes under cohesion policy for the period 2007-2013.
Secondly, the Third cohesion report [ COM(2004)0107 ] presented a proposal for the priorities and delivery system for the new generation programmes under cohesion policy for the period 2007-2013.
The proposal for general provisions on the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund makes a distinction between the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion fund on the one hand and support to fisheries, agriculture and the environment under funding for "preservation and management of natural resources", on the other.
The proposal for general provisions on the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund makes a distinction between the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion fund on the one hand and support to fisheries, agriculture and the environment under funding for "preservation and management of natural resources", on the other.
Accordingly, the Commission has proposed that from 2007-2013, the aid for fisheries shall be concentrated to the new European Fisheries Fund (EFF), which will succeed the current Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG).
Accordingly, the Commission has proposed that from 2007-2013, the aid for fisheries shall be concentrated to the new European Fisheries Fund (EFF), which will succeed the current Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG).
Thus, the fisheries financing from the EFF would be separated under a separate budget heading.
Thus, the fisheries financing from the EFF would be separated under a separate budget heading.
The challenges of the new cohesion policy
The challenges of the new cohesion policy
The necessity to revise the cohesion policy regulations is partly caused by the enormous challenges which follow from enlargement.
The necessity to revise the cohesion policy regulations is partly caused by the enormous challenges which follow from enlargement.
Enlargement will have a considerable effect on the targeting of the measures belonging to the convergence objective, which will continue to have a threshold of GDP per head under 75% of the EU average.
Enlargement will have a considerable effect on the targeting of the measures belonging to the convergence objective, which will continue to have a threshold of GDP per head under 75% of the EU average.
According to the Third Cohesion report, about 92% of the people in the new Member States live in regions with GDP per head below 75% of the EU 25 average.
According to the Third Cohesion report, about 92% of the people in the new Member States live in regions with GDP per head below 75% of the EU 25 average.
This will have an effect on 18 regions with GDP per head under 75% of the EU GDP before enlargement, which will no longer belong under the convergence objective threshold.
This will have an effect on 18 regions with GDP per head under 75% of the EU GDP before enlargement, which will no longer belong under the convergence objective threshold.
The Commission has proposed a transitional mechanism whereby such “statistically affected” areas should be subject to the convergence objective until the end of 2013.
The Commission has proposed a transitional mechanism whereby such “statistically affected” areas should be subject to the convergence objective until the end of 2013.
Enlargement is an exciting opportunity for the whole of the Union but given the 12.5% reduction in the average GDP of the Union as a direct result of the accession of 10 new Member States, it is clear that the challenge for the new cohesion policy is to tackle urgently and effectively the significant socio-economic disparities that exist within the EU-25.
Enlargement is an exciting opportunity for the whole of the Union but given the 12.5% reduction in the average GDP of the Union as a direct result of the accession of 10 new Member States, it is clear that the challenge for the new cohesion policy is to tackle urgently and effectively the significant socio-economic disparities that exist within the EU-25.
Towards a Strategic approach
Towards a Strategic approach
In order to answer to the challenges of the future cohesion policy, the Commission proposes a new architecture based on a strategic approach, which while taking the Lisbon and Gothenburg agendas fully into consideration rationalises the cohesion policy by defining its priorities, ensuring the coordination with the system of economic and social governance and allowing for a regular and open review of the progress made.
In order to answer to the challenges of the future cohesion policy, the Commission proposes a new architecture based on a strategic approach, which while taking the Lisbon and Gothenburg agendas fully into consideration rationalises the cohesion policy by defining its priorities, ensuring the coordination with the system of economic and social governance and allowing for a regular and open review of the progress made.
The Commission therefore proposes that the Council should adopt, after consultation of the Parliament on the basis of a Commission proposal, an overall strategic document defining clear priorities for Member States and regions.
The Commission therefore proposes that the Council should adopt, after consultation of the Parliament on the basis of a Commission proposal, an overall strategic document defining clear priorities for Member States and regions.
The Commission would publish a yearly report summarising Member States' progress reports.
The Commission would publish a yearly report summarising Member States' progress reports.
The priority themes for programmes would be found among three new objectives of the cohesion policy: convergence, regional competitiveness and employment, and territorial co-operation.
The priority themes for programmes would be found among three new objectives of the cohesion policy: convergence, regional competitiveness and employment, and territorial co-operation.
The proposed budget for all these objectives would be € 336,1 bn (0,41 of EU GNI).
The proposed budget for all these objectives would be € 336,1 bn (0,41 of EU GNI).
The convergence objective would include regional and national programmes from the ERDF, the ESF, the Cohesion fund, including a special programme for the outermost regions, and the budget for this objective would be €264 bn (78, 5 %).
The convergence objective would include regional and national programmes from the ERDF, the ESF, the Cohesion fund, including a special programme for the outermost regions, and the budget for this objective would be €264 bn (78, 5 %).
The regional competitiveness and employment objective would consist of regional programmes from ERDF, national programmes from ESF and the budget for this objective would be € 57,9 bn (17,2 %).
The regional competitiveness and employment objective would consist of regional programmes from ERDF, national programmes from ESF and the budget for this objective would be € 57,9 bn (17,2 %).
The territorial co-operation objective would cover cross-border and transnational programmes and networking from the ERDF, with a budget of € 13,2 bn (3,94 %).
The territorial co-operation objective would cover cross-border and transnational programmes and networking from the ERDF, with a budget of € 13,2 bn (3,94 %).
Simplification of the management system and greater decentralisation of the responsibility toward the partners in the Member States, regions and local authorities are among the most ambitious aims of the reform.
Simplification of the management system and greater decentralisation of the responsibility toward the partners in the Member States, regions and local authorities are among the most ambitious aims of the reform.
The programming would be simplified by modifying the roles of the different actors: the Council would adopt strategic guidelines, on the basis of which the Member States would prepare strategic national framework documents to be negotiated with the Commission.
The programming would be simplified by modifying the roles of the different actors: the Council would adopt strategic guidelines, on the basis of which the Member States would prepare strategic national framework documents to be negotiated with the Commission.
The Commission would then adopt national and regional programmes for each Member State, but it would define the programmes only at a priority level.
The Commission would then adopt national and regional programmes for each Member State, but it would define the programmes only at a priority level.
The simplification of programming would be promoted so that the future ERDF and ESF interventions would operate with only one fund per programme, as opposed to current multi-fund programmes.
The simplification of programming would be promoted so that the future ERDF and ESF interventions would operate with only one fund per programme, as opposed to current multi-fund programmes.
Funding of the programmes would be directly linked to the main domain of intervention of each fund.
Funding of the programmes would be directly linked to the main domain of intervention of each fund.
Eligibility and the fisheries sector
Eligibility and the fisheries sector
The Commission proposes that the financial resources dedicated to cohesion policy would be distributed among the Member States applying the method based on objective criteria used at the time of the Berlin Council (1999) for the "convergence" priority (GDP per person below 75 % of the Community GDP), but, temporarily taking into account the statistical effect of enlargement.
The Commission proposes that the financial resources dedicated to cohesion policy would be distributed among the Member States applying the method based on objective criteria used at the time of the Berlin Council (1999) for the "convergence" priority (GDP per person below 75 % of the Community GDP), but, temporarily taking into account the statistical effect of enlargement.
Further, the Commission proposes that resources for the objective "regional competitiveness and employment" would be allocated between the Member States on the basis of Community economic, social and territorial criteria.
Further, the Commission proposes that resources for the objective "regional competitiveness and employment" would be allocated between the Member States on the basis of Community economic, social and territorial criteria.