natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
*** nõusolekumenetlus parlamendi koosseisu enamus, v.a EÜ asutamislepingu artiklites 105, 107, 161 ja 300 ja ELi lepingu artiklis 7 toodud juhtudel
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
(Antud menetlus põhineb Euroopa Komisjoni poolt esitatud õiguslikul alusel.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission)
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek, millega muudetakse direktiivi 94/62/EÜ pakendite ja pakendijäätmete kohta
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule ( KOM(2004)0127 ))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0127 )
ELT C 98, ;
OJ C 98, ,
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 251 lõiget 2 ja artikli 95 lõiget 1, mille alusel Euroopa Komisjon parlamendile ettepaneku esitas ( C6‑0100/2004 );
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0100/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse keskkonna-, rahvatervise- ja toiduohutuse komisjoni raportit ( A6‑0027/2004 );
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0027/2004 ),
Parlamendi muudatusettepanek
Amendments by Parliament
PÕHJENDUS 1
RECITAL 1
1) Pidades silmas Euroopa Liidu laienemist, tuleb pöörata asjakohast tähelepanu erilisele olukorrale tulevastes liikmesriikides, eriti seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi 94/62/EÜ artikli 6 lõikes 1 ringlussevõtu ja taaskasutamise osas püstitatud eesmärkide saavutamisega.
(1) In view of the enlargement of the European Union, due attention needs to be paid to the specific situation in the future Member States, in particular in relation to the attainment of the recycling and recovery targets set out in Article 6(1) of European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC.
1) Pidades silmas Euroopa Liidu hiljutist laienemist, tuleb pöörata asjakohast tähelepanu erilisele olukorrale uutes liikmesriikides, eriti seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi 94/62/EÜ artikli 6 lõikes 1 ringlussevõtu ja taaskasutamise osas püstitatud eesmärkide saavutamisega.
(1) In view of the recent enlargement of the European Union, due attention needs to be paid to the specific situation in the new Member States, in particular in relation to the attainment of the recycling and recovery targets set out in Article 6(1) of European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC.
PÕHJENDUS 2
RECITAL 2
2) 16. aprilli 2003. a ühinemislepingu alusel Euroopa Liiduga ühinevad liikmesriigid vajavad rohkem aega, et kohandada oma ringlussevõtu ja taaskasutamise süsteemid direktiivi 94/62/EÜ eesmärkidega.
(2) Member States acceding to the European Union by virtue of the Accession Treaty of 16 April 2003 require additional time to adapt their recycling and recovery systems to the targets of Directive 94/62/EC.
2) 16. aprilli 2003. a ühinemislepingu alusel Euroopa Liiduga ühinenud liikmesriigid vajavad rohkem aega, et kohandada oma ringlussevõtu ja taaskasutamise süsteemid direktiivi 94/62/EÜ eesmärkidega.
(2) Member States having acceded to the European Union by virtue of the Accession Treaty of 16 April 2003 require additional time to adapt their recycling and recovery systems to the targets of Directive 94/62/EC.
Artikkel 1
ARTICLE 1
Artikli 6 lõige 11 (direktiiv 94/62/EÜ)
Article 6, paragraph 11 (Directive 94/62/EC)
16. aprilli 2003.a ühinemislepingu alusel Euroopa Liiduga ühinevad liikmesriigid võivad lõike 1 punktides b, d ja e nimetatud eesmärkide täitmise lükata edasi enda poolt valitud ajahetkeni, mis ei tohi aga olla hilisem kui 31. detsember 2012.
Member States acceding to the European Union by virtue of the Accession Treaty of 16 April 2003 may postpone the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 1(b), (d) and (e) until a date of their own choosing which shall not be later than 31 December 2012.
16. aprilli 2003.a ühinemislepingu alusel Euroopa Liiduga ühinenud liikmesriigid võivad lõike 1 punktides b, d ja e nimetatud eesmärkide täitmise lükata edasi enda poolt valitud ajahetkeni, mis ei tohi aga järgmiste riikide jaoks olla hilisem kui 31. detsember 2012: Küpros, Tšehhi Vabariik, Eesti, Ungari, Leedu, Slovakkia ja Sloveenia; Malta puhul kehtib tähtaeg 31. detsember 2013; Poola puhul 31. detsember 2014 ja Läti puhul 31. detsember 2015.
Member States having acceded to the European Union by virtue of the Accession Treaty of 16 April 2003 may postpone the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 1(b), (d) and (e) until a date of their own choosing which shall not be later than 31 December 2012 for Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 31 December 2013 for Malta; 31 December 2014 for Poland and 31 December 2015 for Latvia .
Esitatud uued tähtajad vastavad uute liikmesriikide palvetele, mis on äratoodud direktiivis 2004/12/EÜ (põhjendus 6).
The proposed new deadline corresponds to the requests from the new Member States which were mentioned in Directive 2004/12/EC (recital 6).
On 31 December 1994, Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
On 31 December 1994, Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p.
OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p.
10 (hereinafter “original packaging directive”) entered into force.
10 (hereinafter “original packaging directive”) entered into force.
On 11 February 2004, Directive 2004/12/EC
On 11 February 2004, Directive 2004/12/EC
OJ L 47, 18.2.2004, p.
OJ L 47, 18.2.2004, p.
26 (hereinafter “revised packaging directive”) amending Directive 94/62/EC was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council under the co-decision procedure, as laid down in Article 251 of the EC Treaty.
26 (hereinafter “revised packaging directive”) amending Directive 94/62/EC was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council under the co-decision procedure, as laid down in Article 251 of the EC Treaty.
Inter alia, the revised packaging directive sets increased recovery and recycling targets to be achieved by 31 December 2008
Inter alia, the revised packaging directive sets increased recovery and recycling targets to be achieved by 31 December 2008
Greece, Ireland and Portugal may postpone this deadline until 31 December 2011. .
Greece, Ireland and Portugal may postpone this deadline until 31 December 2011. .
At the time when the proposal for the revised packaging directive was submitted to the European Parliament and the Council, accession negotiations with ten countries were ongoing.
At the time when the proposal for the revised packaging directive was submitted to the European Parliament and the Council, accession negotiations with ten countries were ongoing.
These States (hereinafter “acceding States”) have now acceeded to the European Union as of 1 May 2004.
These States (hereinafter “acceding States”) have now acceeded to the European Union as of 1 May 2004.
However, at the time of the adoption of the revised packaging Directive the transition periods for the original directive were not yet finalised for all acceding States.
However, at the time of the adoption of the revised packaging Directive the transition periods for the original directive were not yet finalised for all acceding States.
Furthermore, information on the conditions for further increasing the recovery and recycling targets in the acceding States was insufficient.
Furthermore, information on the conditions for further increasing the recovery and recycling targets in the acceding States was insufficient.
Therefore, the revised packaging directive does not contain specific proposals for the acceding States in its operational part.
Therefore, the revised packaging directive does not contain specific proposals for the acceding States in its operational part.
However, its recital 6 states that "The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree on the need for temporary derogations for the acceding States with respect to the targets ..." and indicates that this "should be decided on the basis of the requests from the acceding States for derogations to run in principle until not later than 2012 for Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 2013 for Malta; 2014 for Poland and 2015 for Latvia" .
However, its recital 6 states that "The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree on the need for temporary derogations for the acceding States with respect to the targets ..." and indicates that this "should be decided on the basis of the requests from the acceding States for derogations to run in principle until not later than 2012 for Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 2013 for Malta; 2014 for Poland and 2015 for Latvia" .
The current proposal lays down a deadline of 31 December 2012 by which the 10 new Member States must fulfil the targets for recovery and recycling of packaging waste.
The current proposal lays down a deadline of 31 December 2012 by which the 10 new Member States must fulfil the targets for recovery and recycling of packaging waste.
This date differs from the above-mentioned recital 6.
This date differs from the above-mentioned recital 6.
In the opinion of the rapporteur it seems fair to follow up the signal that was given by the then candidate countries during the conciliation procedure.
In the opinion of the rapporteur it seems fair to follow up the signal that was given by the then candidate countries during the conciliation procedure.
A quick consultation with MEPs from new Member States has not changed the rapporteur's opinion.
A quick consultation with MEPs from new Member States has not changed the rapporteur's opinion.
The rapporteur, therefore, suggests to amend the Commission proposal by setting the deadline as indicated in recital 6 of the revised packaging Directive (i.e. not later than 31 December 2012 for Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 31 December 2013 for Malta; 31 December 2014 for Poland and 31 December 2015 for Latvia).
The rapporteur, therefore, suggests to amend the Commission proposal by setting the deadline as indicated in recital 6 of the revised packaging Directive (i.e. not later than 31 December 2012 for Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 31 December 2013 for Malta; 31 December 2014 for Poland and 31 December 2015 for Latvia).
During the previous revision of the directive much attention was devoted to the issue of prevention and reuse.
During the previous revision of the directive much attention was devoted to the issue of prevention and reuse.
The Commission will present a report on the implementation of the Directive by 30 June 2005.
The Commission will present a report on the implementation of the Directive by 30 June 2005.
Due to recent developments in the European Union, the rapporteur is of the opinion that the current directive can have an adverse effect on environmentally friendly reuse systems in new and old Member States.
Due to recent developments in the European Union, the rapporteur is of the opinion that the current directive can have an adverse effect on environmentally friendly reuse systems in new and old Member States.
To this end the rapporteur had proposed to clarify that the Member States are encouraged to impose reuse systems of packaging with a view to ensuring a high level of environmental protection, which is one of the objectives of the Directive.
To this end the rapporteur had proposed to clarify that the Member States are encouraged to impose reuse systems of packaging with a view to ensuring a high level of environmental protection, which is one of the objectives of the Directive.
A new compromise proposal is being prepared by the rapporteur.
A new compromise proposal is being prepared by the rapporteur.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi ettepanek, millega muudetakse direktiivi 94/62/EÜ pakendite ja pakendijäätmete kohta
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
EÜ art 251 lg 2 ja art 95 lg 1
Articles 251(2) and 95(1) EC
Raportöör: nimetamise kuupäev
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
Lihtsustatud menetlus Otsuse kuupäev
Simplified procedure Date of decision
Õigusliku aluse vaidlustamine JURI arvamuse kuupäev
Legal basis disputed Date of JURI opinion
Konsulteerimine Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteega istungil otsuse tegemise kuupäev
European Economic and Social Committee consulted Date of decision in plenary
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Johannes (Hans) Blokland, John Bowis, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Alessandro Foglietta, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetete, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Dan Jørgensen, Eija-Riitta Anneli Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-No?lle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Adriana Poli Bortone, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Asa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Johannes (Hans) Blokland, John Bowis, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Alessandro Foglietta, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Dan Jørgensen, Eija-Riitta Anneli Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Adriana Poli Bortone, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Åsa Westlund
Teema: Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanek nõukogu määruse kohta, mis käsitleb turvaelementide ja biomeetriliste andmete standardeid ELi kodanike passides
on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on standards for security features and biometrics in EU citizens' passports
Kodanikuvabaduste-, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjon
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
PE 347.098v03-00
PE 347.098v03-00
VÄHEMUSE ARVAMUS.........................................................................................................18
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................19
Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanek nõukogu määruse kohta, mis käsitleb turvaelementide ja biomeetriliste andmete standardeid ELi kodanike passides
on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on standards for security features and biometrics in EU citizens' passports
– võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut ( KOM(2004)0116 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0116 )
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 62 lõiget 2 a,
– having regard to Article 62, paragraph 2 a) of the EC Treaty,
– võttes arvesse EÜ asutamislepingu artiklit 67, mille alusel nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga ( C5‑0101/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C5‑0101/2004 ),
– võttes arvesse Schengeni acquis ' Euroopa Liitu integreerimist käsitlevat protokolli, vastavalt millele nõukogu konsulteeris parlamendiga,
– having regard to the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament,
– võttes arvesse kodukorra artiklit 51,
– having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– võttes arvesse kodanikuvabaduste, justiits- ja siseasjade komisjoni raportit ( A6‑0028/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0028/2004 ),
Parlamendi muudatusettepanekud
Amendments by Parliament
Põhjendus 2
Recital 2
2) Passide minimaalsed turvanõuded võeti kasutusele resolutsiooniga, mille võtsid vastu 17. oktoobril 2000 nõukogu raames kokku tulnud liikmesriikide valitsuste esindajad.
(2) Minimum security standards for passports were introduced by a Resolution of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on 17 October 2000.
Nüüd on sobiv asendada ja täiendada seda resolutsiooni ühenduse meetmega, et võtta passides kasutusele tõhustatud ühtlustatud turvastandardid nende kaitseks võltsimise eest.
It is now appropriate to replace and upgrade this Resolution by a Community measure in order to achieve enhanced harmonised security standards for passports to protect against falsification.
Samal ajal tuleks passi lisada biomeetrilised elemendid, et luua tegeliku omaniku ja dokumendi vahel kindel seos.
At the same time biometric elements should be integrated in the passport in order to establish a reliable link between the genuine holder and the document.
Euroopa Ülemkogu otsustas, et nüüd on sobiv asendada ja täiendada seda resolutsiooni ühenduse meetmega, et võtta passides kasutusele tõhustatud ühtlustatud turvastandardid nende kaitseks võltsimise eest.
The European Council has decided that it is now appropriate to replace and upgrade this Resolution by a Community measure in order to achieve enhanced harmonised security standards for passports to protect against falsification.
Tuleks rõhutada, et Euroopa Ülemkogu tegi poliitilise otsuse võtta ELi passides kasutusele biomeetrilised tunnused praktikutega konsulteerimata ja teadmata probleemi suurust juhul, kui probleem tõepoolest tekib.
It should be emphasised that the European Council made a political decision to introduce biometric identifiers in EU passports without any input from practitioners and without knowing the magnitude of the problem, if indeed there is a problem.
Üks tunnus, näokujutis, on sellel etapil igal juhul piisav.
One identifier, the facial image, is sufficient in any case, at this stage.
Biomeetrilisi andmeid passides tuleks kasutada üksnes dokumendi ehtsuse kontrollimiseks ja omaniku isiku tuvastamiseks otseselt käepärast olevate võrreldavate tunnuste abil, kui passi esitamist nõutakse õigusnormidega.
(2a) Biometric data in passports should be used only for verifying the authenticity of the document as well as the identity of the holder by means of directly available comparable features when the passport is required to be produced by law.
Kuna biomeetriliste tunnuste passidokumentidesse lisamise põhjus peab olema selgesõnaline, asjakohane, proportsionaalne ja selge, tuleb see lisada.
Since the reason for incorporating biometric features into passport documents has to be explicit, appropriate, proportionate and clear, it needs to be incorporated into the legal text.
Põhjendus 3
Recital 3
3) Turvaelementide ühtlustamine ja biomeetriliste tunnuste sissetoomine on tulevikuarengute perspektiivis Euroopa tasandil oluline samm uute elementide kasutamise suunas, mis muudab reisidokumendi turvalisemaks, loob kindlama seose passi ja selle omaniku vahel ning annab olulise panuse, et tagada kaitset pettuste eest.
(3) The harmonisation of security features and the integration of biometric identifiers is an important step towards the use of new elements in the perspective of future developments at European level, which render the travel document more secure and establish a more reliable link between the holder and the passport as an important contribution to ensuring that it is protected against fraudulent use.
Arvesse võetakse Rahvusvahelise Tsiviillennunduse Organisatsiooni dokumendis nr 9303 sätestatud masinloetavate reisidokumentide spetsifikaate.
The specifications set out in the document No 9303 on machine readable travel documents from the International Civil Aviation Organisation should be taken into account.
ELi määruses ei peaks viitama dokumendile nr 9303, kuna selle pidevalt toimuv muutmise menetlus pole piisavalt läbipaistev ega demokraatlikult legitiimne.
Document No 9303 should not be referred to in an EU regulation, since it is constantly being amended by means of a process which lacks transparency and democratic legitimacy.
Põhjendus 7
Recital 7
7) Isikuandmete puhul, mida seoses passiga töödeldakse, kohaldatakse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 24. oktoobri 1995. aasta direktiivi 95/46/EÜ üksikisikute kaitse kohta isikuandmete töötlemisel ja selliste andmete vaba liikumise kohta
(7) With regard to the personal data to be processed in the context of the passport, Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
Tuleb tagada, et passi ei talletata täiendavat teavet , välja arvatud juhul, kui seda nähakse ette määruses, selle lisas või mainitakse vastavas reisidokumendis.
It must be ensured that no further information shall be stored in the passport unless provided for in the regulation, its annex or unless it is mentioned in the relevant travel document.
Passi ei peaks talletama täiendavat teavet.
No further information should be stored in the passport.
Väga täpselt tuleb teha selgeks, millist teavet passi talletada; tingimuste esitamist täiendava talletatava teabe kohta tuleks vältida.
It must be made very clear exactly what information is to be stored in the passport, and no provisions should be made for further information to be stored.
Artikli 1 lõige 2
Article 1, paragraph 2
Pass hõlmab piisava mahuga salvestuskandjat , mis on väga turvaline ja sisaldab näo kujutist.
The passport shall include a storage medium with sufficient capacity , which shall be highly secured and shall contain a facial image.
Liikmesriigid võivad lisada ka sõrmejäljed ühtselt töödeldavas formaadis.
The Member States may also include fingerprints in interoperable formats.
Pass hõlmab väga turvalist piisava mahuga salvestuskandjat, mis on suuteline tagama andmete terviklikkuse, ehtsuse ja konfidentsiaalsuse.
The passport shall include a highly secure storage medium with sufficient capacity and the capability of safeguarding the integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the data stored.
See sisaldab näo kujutist.
It shall contain a facial image.
Ei looda Euroopa passide ega reisidokumentide keskandmebaasi, mis sisaldab kõikide ELi passide omanike biomeetrilisi ja muid andmeid.
No central database of European Union passports and travel documents containing all EU passport holders' biometric and other data shall be set up.
Tehnospetsifikaadid on privaatsuse kaitsmisel olulise tähtsusega.
The technical specifications are crucial to privacy.
Seepärast tuleb konkreetselt välja tuua kindlad kriteeriumid, millele nad peavad vastama.
Certain criteria with which they have to comply should therefore be specifically mentioned.
Keskandmebaasi loomine võib kahjustada eesmärki ja proportsionaalsuse põhimõtet.
The setting up of a centralised database would violate the purpose and the principle of proportionality.
Samuti võib see suurendada kuritarvituste ohtu ja eesmärkidest võõrandumist.
It would also increase the risk of abuse and function creep.
Lõpuks võib see suurendada biomeetriliste tunnuste kasutamise ohtu "sissepääsuvõtmetena" erinevatesse andmebaasidesse, ühendades seeläbi andmekogud.
Finally, it would increase the risk of using biometric identifiers as 'access keys' to various databases, thereby interconnecting data sets.
Artikli 2 lõike 1 sissejuhatav osa
Article 2, paragraph 1, introductory part
Passe puudutavad täiendavad tehnospetsifikatsioonid määratakse kindlaks vastavalt artikli 5 lõikes 2 toodud menetlusele järgnevalt:
Additional technical specifications for the passport relating to the following shall be established in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 5(2) :