natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nendel ja muudel juhtudel, kus pädevad asutused kutsuvad taotleja välja, makstakse teenuste eest riiklikest vahenditest;
In these and in other cases where the competent authorities call upon the applicant, the services shall be paid for out of public funds;
Artikli 9 lõike 1 punkt c
Article 9, paragraph 1, point (c)
c) varjupaigataotlejal peab olema võimalus võtta ühendust UNHCRiga või mõne muu liikmesriigi territooriumil vastava liikmesriigiga sõlmitud kokkuleppe alusel UNHCRi nimel tegutseva organisatsiooniga;
(c) they must not be denied the opportunity to communicate with the UNHCR or with any other organisation working on behalf of the UNHCR in the territory of the Member State pursuant to an agreement with that Member State;
c) varjupaigataotlejale tuleb anda võimalus võtta ühendust UNHCRiga või mõne muu UNHCRi nimel või sõltumatult varjupaigataotlejatega töötava organisatsiooniga liikmesriigi territooriumil;
(c) they must be given an effective opportunity to communicate with the UNHCR or with any other organisation working on behalf of the UNHCR or independently with asylum seekers in the territory of the Member State;
The amendment is self-evident.
The amendment is self-evident.
Artikli 9 lõike 1 punkt d
Article 9, paragraph 1, point (d)
d) varjupaigataotlejat peab mõistliku aja jooksul teavitama tuvastava asutuse otsusest tema varjupaigataotluse kohta.
(d) they must be given notice in reasonable time of the decision by the determining authority on their application for asylum.
Kui varjupaigataotlejat esindab ametlikult juriidiline nõustaja või muu nõustaja, võivad liikmesriigid otsusest teavitada teda ja mitte varjupaigataotlejat;
If a legal adviser or other counsellor is legally representing the applicant, Member States may choose to give notice of the decision to him/her instead of to the applicant for asylum;
d) varjupaigataotlejat peab mitte hiljem kui kuue kuu jooksul teavitama tuvastava asutuse otsusest tema varjupaigataotluse kohta.
(d) they must be given notice , within a time-limit which shall not exceed 6 months, of the decision by the determining authority on their application for asylum.
If the procedures are to be swift and efficient, a maximum time-limit for decision must be set, based on the Community average.
If the procedures are to be swift and efficient, a maximum time-limit for decision must be set, based on the Community average.
Artikli 9 A lõike 2 punkt d
Article 9A, paragraph 2, point (d)
d) pädevad asutused võivad taotleja ja temaga kaasas olevad asjad läbi otsida ;
(d) the competent authorities may search the applicant and the items he/she carries with him/her;
d) pädevad asutused võivad kindlaks teha, et taotleja ei ole ohtlik, ja kontrollida temaga kaasas olevaid asju ;
(d) the competent authorities may ascertain that the applicant does not constitute a danger and check the items he/she carries with him/her;
Applicants for asylum should be treated as persons in need of help and it should not be assumed that they constitute a danger and hence are subject to prosecution.
Applicants for asylum should be treated as persons in need of help and it should not be assumed that they constitute a danger and hence are subject to prosecution.
They are entitled to fair treatment and the appropriate safeguards.
They are entitled to fair treatment and the appropriate safeguards.
Enne, kui tuvastav asutus võtab vastu otsuse, antakse varjupaigataotlejale võimalus tema varjupaigataotlusega seonduvaks küsitluseks, mille viib läbi siseriiklike seaduste alusel pädevaks tunnistatud isik.
Before a decision is taken by the determining authority, the applicant for asylum shall be given the opportunity of a personal interview on his/her application for asylum with a person competent under national law to conduct such an interview.
Enne, kui tuvastav asutus võtab vastu otsuse, antakse varjupaigataotlejale võimalus tema varjupaigataotlusega seonduvaks küsitluseks, mille viib vajaduse korral tõlgi ja varjupaigataotleja advokaadi või seadusliku esindaja juuresolekul läbi varjupaigaõigust ja pagulasi puudutavaid menetlusi sätestavate siseriiklike õigusaktide alusel kutsealaselt sobivaks ja kvalifitseerituks tunnistatud isik.
Before a decision is taken by the determining authority, the applicant for asylum shall be given the opportunity of a personal interview , if necessary in the presence of an interpreter and his/her lawyer or legal representative on his/her application for asylum with a person professionally appropriate, and qualified under national law governing the procedures concerning right of asylum and refugees, to conduct such an interview.
Laste ning füüsilise või vaimse häirega isikute ja rasedate naiste või seksuaalse vägivalla ohvrite korral tuleb kehtestada kindlad menetluslikud tagatised ja vajaduse korral kaasata erikvalifikatsiooniga kutsetöötajad.
In the case of children or persons with physical or mental limitations and pregnant women or victims of sexual violence, specific procedural guarantees should be provided and, if necessary, specifically qualified professionals should be brought in.
The interview should be held in the presence of qualified and appropriate personnel.
The interview should be held in the presence of qualified and appropriate personnel.
Knowledge of national legislation is not sufficient to safeguard applicants for asylum, who are mainly protected by international conventions.
Knowledge of national legislation is not sufficient to safeguard applicants for asylum, who are mainly protected by international conventions.
They often require psychological support and need formal legal advice.
They often require psychological support and need formal legal advice.
Thus only the specific qualities of the persons assisting in the interview can help to provide elements useful for the successful outcome of the application.
Thus only the specific qualities of the persons assisting in the interview can help to provide elements useful for the successful outcome of the application.
Artikli 10 lõike 1 esimene lõik
Article 10, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
Liikmesriigid võivad anda ka igale artikli 5 lõikes 3 viidatud ülalpeetavatele täisealisele isikule võimaluse lasta end küsitleda .
Member States may also give the opportunity of a personal interview to each adult among the dependants referred to in Article 5(3) .
Ka artikli 5 lõikes 3 viidatud ülalpeetavatel on õigus lasta end küsitleda .
The dependants referred to in Article 5(3) shall also have the right to a personal interview.
Acknowledgement of cases where the applicant is not familiar with all the relevant activities or events relating to the dependent, for example in case the wife did not tell her husband about sexual abuse by government authorities or other actors out of shame and/or fear.
Acknowledgement of cases where the applicant is not familiar with all the relevant activities or events relating to the dependent, for example in case the wife did not tell her husband about sexual abuse by government authorities or other actors out of shame and/or fear.
Here, the wife has the right to be heard separately and have her own personal interview.
Here, the wife has the right to be heard separately and have her own personal interview.
Artikli 10 lõike 1 kolmas lõik
Article 10, paragraph 1, subparagraph 3
Liikmesriigid võivad määrata siseriiklike õigusaktidega ära juhtumid, kus küsitluse võimalus antakse alaealisele.
Member States may determine in national legislation the cases in which a minor shall be given the opportunity of a personal interview.
Liikmesriigid võivad määrata siseriiklike õigusaktidega ära juhtumid, kus küsitluse võimalus antakse lapsele , võttes arvesse isiku küpsusastet ja kõiki läbielatud psühholoogilisi traumasid .
Member States may determine in national legislation the cases in which a child shall be given the opportunity of a personal interview , taking into account the individual's level of maturity and any psychological trauma he/she has endured.
Küsitleja peab meeles pidama, et vanuse tõttu võivad lapse teadmised päritoluriigi tingimuste kohta olla piiratud.
The interviewer shall bear in mind that due to his/her age, the child's knowledge of conditions in the country of origin may be limited.
Artikli 10 lõike 2 punkt a a (uus)
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (a a) (new)
a a) pädev asutus ei saa küsitlust läbi viia kuna taotleja on mõjuva põhjuseta kohale mitte ilmunud;
(aa) the competent authority is not able to conduct the interview, because the applicant has, without good reasons, not complied with invitations to appear;
The exceptions provided under article 2(b)(c) and 3 undermine the fairness of procedures and the accuracy of decisions.
The exceptions provided under article 2(b)(c) and 3 undermine the fairness of procedures and the accuracy of decisions.
Interviews are necessary in order to allow the applicant to provide all relevant information and to clarify any discrepancies or inconsistencies in his/her account.
Interviews are necessary in order to allow the applicant to provide all relevant information and to clarify any discrepancies or inconsistencies in his/her account.
In the absence of an interview, Member States will not be able to fulfil their obligations under international law and this would inevitably result in the refoulement of individuals.
In the absence of an interview, Member States will not be able to fulfil their obligations under international law and this would inevitably result in the refoulement of individuals.
Only very limited exceptions shall be allowed.
Only very limited exceptions shall be allowed.
Artikli 10 lõike 2 punkt a b (uus)
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (a b)(new)
a b) taotleja vaimne häire või hingeline erutus takistavad tema juhtumi tavapärast läbivaatamist;
(ab) the person has a mental or emotional disturbance which impedes a normal examination of his/her case;
Artikli 10 lõike 2 punkt b
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (b)
b) pädev asutus on taotlejaga juba kohtunud seoses tema abistamisega taotluse täitmisel ning taotlust puudutava olulise teabe esitamisega
(b) the competent authority has already had a meeting with the applicant for the purpose of assisting him/her with filling his/her application and submitting the essential information regarding the
Artikli 10 lõike 2 punkt c
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (c)
c) tuvastav asutus leiab taotleja poolt esitatud teabe põhjalikul uurimisel, et taotlus on artikli 23 lõike 4 punktides a, c, g, h ja j nimetatud asjaolude tõttu põhjendamatu.
(c) the determining authority, on the basis of a complete examination of information provided by the applicant, considers the application as unfounded in the cases where the circumstances mentioned in Article 23(4)(a), (c), (g), (h) and (j) apply.
See justifications to Article 10, paragraph 2 (b).
See justifications to Article 10, paragraph 2 (b).
Artikli 10 lõige 3
Article 10, paragraph 3
Küsitluse võib ka ära jätta, kui see pole praktikas mõistlikult läbiviidav, eelkõige juhul, kui pädev asutus on seisukohal, et taotleja pole temast mitteolenevatel püsivatel asjaoludel küsitluseks võimeline või suuteline.
The personal interview may also be omitted, where it is not reasonably practicable, in particular where the competent authority is of the opinion that the applicant is unfit or unable to be interviewed owing to enduring circumstances beyond his/her control.
Kahtluse korral võivad liikmesriigid nõuda arsti või psühhiaatri tõendit.
When in doubt, Member States may require a medical or psychological certificate.
Kui liikmesriik ei taga isiku või vajaduse korral ülalpeetava küsitluse võimalust vastavalt käesolevale lõikele, tuleb teha asjakohaseid jõupingutusi võimaldamaks taotlejal või ülalpeetaval esitada lisateavet muul viisil.
Where the Member State does not provide the opportunity for a personal interview pursuant to this paragraph, or where applicable, to the dependant, reasonable efforts must be made to allow the applicant or the dependant to submit further information.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et taotlejale, kes ei saa oma meditsiinilise või psühholoogilise tervisliku seisundi, füüsilise või vaimse puude või konkreetse emotsionaalse häirituse tõttu küsitluses osaleda või seda lõpuni teha, pööratakse erilist tähelepanu, et tagada õiglane menetlemine.
Member States shall ensure that an applicant who cannot attend or complete a personal interview owing to his/her state of medical and/or psychological health, physical or mental disability, or particular emotional disturbance, is given specific attention in order to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings.
Artikli 10 lõige 4
Article 10, paragraph 4
Käesoleva artikli kohase küsitluse läbiviimata jätmine ei takista tuvastavat asutust võtmast vastu otsust varjupaigataotluse kohta.
The absence of a personal interview in accordance with this Article shall not prevent the determining authority from taking a decision on an application for asylum.
Käesoleva artikli kohase küsitluse läbiviimata jätmine ei takista tuvastavat asutust võtmast vastu otsust varjupaigataotluse kohta, kui küsitlus on jäetud läbi viimata artikli 2 punktides b ja c, artikli 10 lõikes 3, artikli 20 lõikes 1, artikli 23 lõike 4 punktides a, c, g, h ja j ning käesoleva artikli lõikes 3 loetletud põhjustel.
The absence of a personal interview in accordance with this Article shall not prevent the determining authority from taking a decision on an application for asylum if the absence is for reasons connected with Articles 2(b) and (c), 10(3), 20(1), 23(4)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j), and paragraph 3 of this Article .
Artikli 10 lõige 5
Article 10, paragraph 5
Lõike 2 punktide b ja c ning lõike 3 kohase küsitluse läbiviimata jätmine ei mõjuta tuvastava asutuse otsust ebasoodsas suunas .
The absence of a personal interview pursuant to paragraph 2(b) and (c) and paragraph 3 shall not adversely affect the decision of the determining authority.
Küsitluse läbiviimata jätmine ei mõjuta tuvastava asutuse otsust negatiivselt .
The absence of a personal interview shall not negatively impact on the decision of the determining authority.
Sellistel juhtudel tuleb igale inimesele anda võimalus olla esindatud eestkostja või seadusliku esindaja poolt laste puhul või vastavalt vajadusele nõustaja või õigusnõustaja poolt.
In such cases, each person must be given the opportunity to be represented, by a guardian or a legal representative in the case of children, or a counsellor or legal adviser as appropriate.
Artikli 10 lõige 6
Article 10, paragraph 6
Olenemata artikli 20 lõikest 1 võivad liikmesriigid võtta varjupaigataotluse kohta otsuse tegemisel arvesse asjaolu, et taotleja ei ilmunud küsitlusele, välja arvatud juhul, kui tal oli mitteilmumiseks mõjuv põhjus.
Irrespective of Article 20 (1), Member States, when deciding on the application for asylum, may take into account the fact that the applicant failed to appear for the personal interview, unless he or she had good reasons for the failure to appear.
Olenemata artikli 20 lõikest 1 võivad liikmesriigid võtta varjupaigataotluse kohta otsuse tegemisel arvesse asjaolu, et taotleja ei ilmunud küsitlusele, välja arvatud juhul, kui tal oli mitteilmumiseks mõjuv põhjus, või kui küsitlus ei toimunud või lõpetati taotleja psühholoogilise ja/või tervisliku seisundi tõttu.
Irrespective of Article 20 (1), Member States, when deciding on the application for asylum, may take into account the fact that the applicant failed to appear for the personal interview, unless he or she had good reasons for the failure to appear , or the interview failed to materialise or was terminated due to the applicant's psychological and/or medical state .
Artikli 11 lõike 3 punkt a
Article 11, paragraph 3, point (a)
a) tagavad, et küsitlust läbiviiv isik oleks piisavalt pädev, et võtta võimalikult palju arvesse taotlusega seotud isiklikke või üldisi asjaolusid, kaasa arvatud taotleja kultuurilist tausta ja kaitsetut olekut; ning
a) ensure that the person who conducts the interview is sufficiently competent to take account of the personal or general circumstances surrounding the application, including the applicant’s cultural origin or vulnerability, insofar as it is possible to do so, and
a) tagavad, et küsitlust läbiviiv isik ja tõlk on saanud sobivat koolitust ning omavad asjakohast ametialast pädevust ning õiglase ja täpse hindamise oskust , et võtta võimalikult palju arvesse taotlusega seotud isiklikke või üldisi asjaolusid, kaasa arvatud taotleja kultuurilist tausta ja kaitsetut olekut; ning
a) ensure that the person who conducts the interview and the interpreter have received the appropriate training and have appropriate professional competence and the ability to make a fair and accurate assessment of the personal or general circumstances surrounding the application, including the applicant’s cultural origin or vulnerability, insofar as it is possible to do so, and
The person who conducts the interview with the applicant for asylum needs to have the right professional qualifications and abilities to enable him to make accurate assessments that do not damage the applicant’s interests.
The person who conducts the interview with the applicant for asylum needs to have the right professional qualifications and abilities to enable him to make accurate assessments that do not damage the applicant’s interests.
Artikli 11 lõike 3 punkt b
Article 11, paragraph 3, point (b)
b) valivad tõlgi, kes on võimeline tagama asjakohase suhtlemise taotleja ja küsitlust läbiviiva isiku vahel.
(b) select an interpreter who is able to ensure appropriate communication between the applicant and the person who conducts the interview.
Suhtlemiskeeleks ei pea olema keel, mida varjupaigataotleja eelistab, kui on mõni teine keel, mille puhul on põhjust oletada, et varjupaigataotleja seda mõistab ja on võimeline selles keeles suhtlema .
The communication need not necessarily take place in the language preferred by the applicant for asylum if there is another language which he/she may reasonably be supposed to understand and in which he/she is able to communicate in.
Suhtlemiskeeleks ei pea olema keel, mida varjupaigataotleja eelistab, kui on mõni teine keel, millest ta saab aru ja milles ta suudab suhelda .
The communication need not necessarily take place in the language preferred by the applicant for asylum if there is another language which he/she is able to understand and communicate in.
Liikmesriigid võivad ette näha eeskirjad, mis puudutavad kolmandate isikute viibimist küsitluse juures.
Member States may provide for rules concerning the presence of third parties at the personal interview.
Liikmesriigid näevad ette eeskirjad, mis puudutavad kolmandate isikute viibimist küsitluse juures, kui need eeskirjad on kooskõlas rahvusvaheliste standarditega.
Member States shall provide for rules concerning the presence of third parties at the personal interview , provided such rules are in accordance with international standards .
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et iga küsitluse kohta koostatakse kirjalik aruanne, mis sisaldab vähemalt taotleja poolt taotluse kohta esitatud olulist teavet nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ artikli 4 lõike 2 tingimustel.
Member States shall ensure that a written report is made of every personal interview, containing at least the essential information regarding the application, as presented by the applicant, in terms of Article 4(2) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et iga küsitluse kohta koostatakse kirjalik aruanne, mis sisaldab taotleja poolt taotluse kohta esitatud teavet nõukogu direktiivi 2004/83/EÜ artikli 4 lõike 2 tingimustel.
Member States shall ensure that a written report is made of every personal interview, containing the information regarding the application as presented by the applicant, in terms of Article 4(2) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC.
The Council proposal states that the report does not have to be a transcript of what has been said (as proposed by the Commission in 2002).
The Council proposal states that the report does not have to be a transcript of what has been said (as proposed by the Commission in 2002).
The interview, however, is the main fact-finding possibility.
The interview, however, is the main fact-finding possibility.
The failure to fully record the personal interview is condemned by the ECtHR in Chahal case.
The failure to fully record the personal interview is condemned by the ECtHR in Chahal case.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et taotlejal oleks võimalus pääseda küsitlust käsitlevale aruandele juurde õigeaegselt.
Member States shall ensure that applicants have timely access to the report of the personal interview.
Kui juurdepääs võimaldatakse alles pärast seda, kui tuvastav asutus on otsuse teinud, tagab liikmesriik juurdepääsu niipea kui võimalik, et apellatsioonikaebust saaks õigeaegselt ette valmistada ja esitada.
Where access is only granted after the decision of the determining authority, Member States shall ensure that access is possible as soon as necessary for allowing an appeal to be prepared and lodged in due time.
Liikmesriigid tagavad, et taotlejal oleks võimalus pääseda küsitlust käsitlevale aruandele juurde õigeaegselt talle arusaadavas keeles või mõnes muus sobivas vormis.
Member States shall ensure that applicants have timely access to the report of the personal interview in a language they understand or in another form considered appropriate .
The report should be accessible, if possible in a language that applicant understands, but, above all, the timing of its being made available should not prevent an appeal from being lodged.
The report should be accessible, if possible in a language that applicant understands, but, above all, the timing of its being made available should not prevent an appeal from being lodged.
Artikli 12 lõike 3 esimene lõik
Article 12, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1
Liikmesriigid võivad nõuda küsitlust käsitlevale aruandele taotleja heakskiitu .
Member states may request the applicant's approval on the contents of the report of the personal interview.
Liikmesriigid peavad laskma taotlejal küsitlust käsitlevat aruannet kontrollida, et vältida vääritimõistmisi või vastuolusid või taotluse hilisemat kehtetuks tunnistamist
Member States must have the applicant verify the contents of the report of the personal interview , in order to avoid misunderstandings or contradictions or invalidation of the application at a later date.
Artikli 12 lõike 3 teine lõik
Article 12, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2
Kui taotleja keeldub küsitlust käsitlevat aruannet heaks kiitmast , märgitakse keeldumise põhjused taotleja toimikusse.
Where an applicant refuses to approve the contents of the report, the reasons for this refusal shall be entered into the applicant's file.
Kui taotleja keeldub küsitlust käsitlevat aruannet kontrollimast , märgitakse keeldumise põhjused taotleja toimikusse.
Where an applicant refuses to verify the contents of the report, the reasons for this refusal shall be entered into the applicant's file.
Artikli 12 lõike 3 kolmas lõik
Article 12, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3
Taotleja keeldumine kiita heaks küsitlust puudutav aruanne ei takista tuvastavat asutust võtmast vastu otsust taotluse kohta.
The refusal of an applicant to approve the contents of the report of the personal interview shall not prevent the determining authority from taking a decision on his/her application.
Varjupaigataotleja peaks paluma aruande heakskiitmist.
Approval of the asylum applicant should be requested.
Taotleja keeldumine kiita heaks küsitlust puudutav aruanne ei või takistada tuvastavat asutust võtmast vastu otsust taotluse kohta.
The refusal of an applicant to approve the contents of the report of the personal interview may not prevent the determining authority from taking a decision on his/her application.
The approval of the asylum seeker should be requested to verify the content of the report, to avoid misunderstanding and facilitate the clarification of contradictions.
The approval of the asylum seeker should be requested to verify the content of the report, to avoid misunderstanding and facilitate the clarification of contradictions.