natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
David CASA (EPP-ED, MT) raportis toetavad saadikud Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut ning pooldavad euro kasutuselevõttu Slovakkias 1. jaanuaril 2009. aastal.
The European Parliament calls on Member States to put in place a physical single entry point for any consumer information request, for example through national energy regulators, thus facilitating consumer access to information and at the same time ensuring that information is available as close to consumers as possible in terms of place, time, tools and thoroughness.
Parlamendiliikmed kutsuvad lisaks Slovakkia tööturu osapooli üles hoidma lähemas tulevikus palkade kasv kooskõlas tootlikkuse kasvuga.
The House considers therefore that all consumers should be informed in an objective, transparent and non-discriminatory way about the sources of energy available to them.
Lisaks palutakse Slovakkia valitsusel kindlustada vajalike struktuurireformide jätkumine tööjõu-, teenuste- ja kaubaturul ning valitsust kutsutakse üles tagama konkurentsi eelkõige sellistes tundlikes sektorites nagu energiasektor.
Parliament calls on Member States to invest as a priority in comprehensive energy efficiency measures for low-income households, thereby addressing in a strategic manner both the problem of fuel poverty and the "20% by 2020" energy efficiency target adopted at the 2007 Spring European Council.
Valitsusel soovitatakse luua vaatluskeskus valitud arvu peamiste kaupade hindade iganädalaseks jälgimiseks, et võidelda hindade tõusuga seotud väärarusaamadega.
NRAs should be made responsible for monitoring the process of such development and for laying down common standards for that purpose.
Järgmised sammud Euroopa Ülemkogu peaks 19.-20. juuni tippkohtumisel tegema Slovakkia euroalaga liitumise osas poliitilise otsuse.
Member States, say MEPs, should be required to ensure that standards establishing the minimum technical design and operational requirements for meters address interoperability issues to provide maximum benefit at minimum cost to consumers.
Seejärel pannakse vastav seadusandlus hääletusele rahandusministrite kohtumisel.
Finally, the report asks the Commission to carry out an in-depth study on the current use of smart meters in private households and, if necessary to carefully examine the possibility of developing and, after consulting Parliament, financing with a view to promoting best practices.
Parlamendil on euroala laienemise osas nõuandev roll.
The report underlines the importance of promoting and supporting industry in its efforts in this regard.
David CASA (EPP-ED, MT) Dokument: A6-0231/2008 Menetlus: Nõuandemenetlus (*) Arutelu: 17.06.2008 Hääletus: 17.06.2008
Text, as adopted by the EP, will be available here (click on 19 June)
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-006-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-007-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Euroopa Ülemkogu ettevalmistused pärast Iirimaa referendumit
MEPs give green light for new EU waste legislation with binding 2020 targets
Täiskogul arutati 19. ja 20. juunil aset leidnud Euroopa Ülemkogu ettevalmistusi, eelkõige seoses Iirimaa referendumi tulemusega.
The EU will have new waste legislation which includes targets for re-use and recycling of waste to be attained by 2020 after MEPs adopted amendments.
Teised saadikud leidsid, et ratifitseerimisprotsess tuleb koheselt peatada.
Waste prevention targets will be considered by the Commission in the future.
Nõukogu kõnevoor Sloveenia välisminister Janez LENARČIČ märkis, et esimese teemana käsitletakse ülemkogul Iiri referendumi tulemust.
Incineration of waste will be categorised as a recovery operation rather than disposal, provided it meets a certain energy efficiency standard.
Lisaks sellele arutatakse ülemkogule veel mh järgmisi teemasid: kütuse hinnatõus, toiduainete hinnatõus, Lääne-Balkan, aastatuhande arengueesmärkide saavutamine, energia- ja kliimapakett ning Euroopa naabruspoliitika.
In the debate on Monday 16 June, Parliament's rapporteur Caroline JACKSON (EPP-ED, South West, Conservative UK) said: "It has been a long and tortuous road to this second reading.
Komisjoni kõnevoor José Manuel BARROSO nentis, et ülemkogul räägitakse tõenäoliselt eelkõige Iirimaast.
There was much resistance to what we wanted to do and the Council drove a very hard bargain...
Barroso märkis veel, et valitsustel on suur vastutus ratifitseerimisprotsessis ning et kui kodus süüdistatakse esmaspäevast laupäevani Brüsselit, siis pole mõtet loota, et pühapäeval hääletavad kodanikud Euroopa poolt.
The compromise was supported by many speakers during yesterday's debate though several speakers would have liked to achieve more.
Fraktsioonide kõnevoor Joseph DAUL (EPP-ED, FR) ütles, et i irlased väljendasid oma vastuseisu Lissaboni lepingule ning et tema fraktsioon austab seda, nagu ka nende liikmesriikide otsust, kes lepingu on ratifitseerinud.
Several MEPs were unhappy that the compromise was too weak and criticised that no binding waste prevention target is included or would have preferred to have even tougher targets for recycling and re-use.
"Oleme demokraatia poolt ja seetõttu soovime, et kõik riigid ütleksid välja oma otsuse," kinnitas ta.
Inclusion of targets for re-use and recycling
Ta lisas, et Iirimaa "ei" tähendab seda, et me peame defineerima oma eesmärgid paremini ning arvestama inimeste muredega, eelkõige mis puudutab toiduainete ning kütuse hinnatõusu.
MEPs managed in including in the directive a new article on re-use and recycling targets, which was foreseen neither by the original Commissions' proposal nor by the Common Position.
Daul leidis ka, et Euroopa endassevaatamise periood peaks võimalikult kiiresti lõppema.
The compromise states that Member Sates "shall take the necessary measures designed to achieve the following targets":
Martin SCHULZ (PSE, DE) märkis, et liit on juba 8 aastat püüdnud erinevaid lepinguid ratifitseerida, kuid ei suuda sellega hakkama saada.
- by 2020 for re-use and recycling of waste materials such as paper, metal glass from households and similar waste streams: 50 %
Tema sõnul näitab Iirimaa "ei", et tegemist on usalduskriisiga nii riiklikul kui ka liidu tasandil.
In the debate Commissioner Dimas underlined that "it was hard to persuade the Member States for objectives".
Schulz leidis, et volinik McCreevylt tuleks portfell ära võtta, sest ta pole oma ülesandeid täitnud - ta ainult dereguleerib, ent ei võta vastu sotsiaalmeetmeid.
Answering several MEPs who criticised the targets for being too weak, he confirmed that: "If these targets are not met in 2020, the Commission can take Member States to court for non-compliance with the requirements of the Directive."
Schulz tahtis ka teada, kuhu on jäänud iirlaste kirg ELi suhtes ja miks suhtuvad inimesed liitu nii halvasti, ning ta rõhutas, et kodanike usaldus tuleb tagasi võita.
A special target for manufacturing and industrial waste, as demanded by MEPs is not included in the compromise but the Commission has to examine the targets by 2020 and eventually reinforce them or consider setting targets for other waste streams.
Graham R. WATSON i (ALDE, UK) sõnul on ring saanud täis ja me oleme tagasi Nice'i lepingu juures.
Waste prevention is reinforced - targets to be considered in the future
Ta avaldas veendumust, et enamik inimestest siiski toetavad liitu, ehkki usaldus institutsioonide vastu kahaneb.
The new directive will oblige Member States to establish waste management plans and waste prevention programmes with waste prevention objectives 5 years after entry into force of the directive.
Watson rõhutas, et nüüd tuleb aeg ära kasutada ja tuleb käivitada kampaania, et selgitada Euroopa vajalikkust inimeste jaoks ja seda, "miks see teile hea on".
Further to this duty the compromise includes a new article on waste prevention.
Frassoni soovis, et lepingut veel mitte ratifitseerinud riigid läbiksid ratifitseerimisprotsessi.
For MEPs, a crucial aim is to reduce the amount of landfill and incineration, both of which cause pollution.
Tema sõnul on vaja "positiivset teksti, mis pärineb veendunud riikidelt ja demokraatlikelt jõududelt, ning mis on piisav selleks, et protsessiga edasi minna."
Members were divided over whether incineration of municipal solid waste should be regarded as a "disposal" or a "recovery" operation, the latter one being a better option regarding the waste hierarchy.
Brian CROWLEY (UEN, IE) sõnul on keeruline öelda, miks öeldi "ei" ning ta lisas, et vaja on aega, et arutada põhjuseid.
In the vote, MEPs backed the Commission and Council position that it should be categorised as recovery, provided it meets a certain energy efficiency standards (energy efficiency formula in annex II to the directive).
Ta avaldas arvamust, et ehk peaks kodanikelt endalt küsima, kuidas edasi minna ja toime tulla probleemidega.
According to the Commission this has the effect that only the most energy efficient existing municipal solid waste incinerators will be classified as recovery installations.
Ta leidis ka, et Lissaboni leping on mõistetamatu ning pärit "elevandiluust tornist".
But it is important to recognise that the Parliament has now ensured, by writing in targets for recycling and emphasising waste prevention objectives, that incineration of residual waste will have to go hand in hand with recycling."
Ta avaldas lõpetuseks lootust, et Euroopa poliitika muutub edaspidi õiglasemaks.
MEPs also managed to include a revision after 6 years of the energy efficiency provisions into the compromise.
Nigel Paul FARAGE (IND/DEM, UK) ütles iirlastele: "Tublid olete!".
Member States to stick to binding five-stage hierarchy
Ta lisas, et lepingu ratifitseerimine peab nüüd lõppema.
The five-stage waste hierarchy, which is designed to prevent and reduce waste production, is made more certain and comprehensive and moved to a more prominent place.
Eesti saadiku sõnavõtt Tunne KELAM (EPP-ED, EE) märkis, et loomulikult tuleb austada Iiri valijate otsust, kuid et me "peame austama ka 18 demokraatlikult valitud parlamendi otsuseid".
The hierarchy lays down an order of preference for waste operations: prevention, re-use, recycling, other recovery operations and, as a last resort, safe and environmentally sound disposal.
"Veelgi enam - oleme kohustatud näitama samasugust respekti ülejäänud kaheksa liikmesriigi suhtes sellega, et võimaldame ka neil vabalt Lissaboni reformilepingu üle otsustada," ütles Kelam.
Member States shall treat it "as a priority order", in waste prevention and management legislation rather than as a "guiding principle" as proposed by Council.
"Kõige lugupidamise juures Iiri referendumi vastu ei tohi 27-liikmelisest Euroopast saada piiratud arvuga reformilepingu vastaste poliitiline pantvang," kinnitas kõneleja.
Departing from the hierarchy may be possible where it is justified by "life cycle" thinking on the overall impacts of the generation and management of such waste.
Kelam leidis ka, et liidu reformile pole alternatiivi, sest Euroopa võib peatuda, kuid "maailm meie ümber ei peatu meie pärast".
The directive includes furthermore a definition on by-products and of the "end-of-waste" status.
Kelami arvates on antud olukorral moraalne mõõde.
The 1.8 billion tonnes of waste generated each year in Europe works out at 3.5 tonnes per person.
"See on äratuskella signaal, mis kutsub meid usutavalt pühenduma Euroopa põhiväärtustele," väitis kõneleja.
This consists mainly of waste from households, commercial activities (e.g., shops, restaurants, hospitals etc.), industry (e.g. pharmaceutical companies, clothes manufacturers etc.), agriculture (e.g. slurry), construction and demolition projects, mining and quarrying activities and from energy generation.
"Meie kodanikud ei tea ehk lepingute üksikasju, ent nad suudavad alati ja eksimatult ausust ning ehtsat pühendumist eristada pooltõdedest ja pragmaatilisest reaalpoliitikast," lisas Kelam.
Municipal waste generation averages 530kg per person per year, an average that masks significant differences among Member States.
"Aeg on esitada endile ja meie kodanikele küsimus: mida me saame teha oma ühise Euroopa heaks?
For example, per capita waste generation is 300 to 350 kg per annum in the EU-10 Member States, but around 570 kg in the EU-15.
Kui poliitilised liidrid selles veenvat eeskuju näitavad, siis tulevad kodanikud kaasa, " uskus Kelam.
In 2005, 49% of EU municipal waste was disposed of through landfill, 18% was incinerated and 27% recycled or composted.
Audio, 26:21, ingliskeelne Audio, 30:23, ingliskeelne
75/439/EEC, 75/442/EEC and 91/689/EEC) Text, as adopted by the EP, will be available here (click on 17 June)
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-007-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-008-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Jacques Barrot ja Antonio Tajani said volinikena parlamendi toetuse
Water pollutants to be more strictly controlled as MEPs adopt legislation
Täiskogu toetas Euroopa Komisjoni asepresidendile Jacques Barrot'le justiitsküsimuste, vabaduse ja julgeoleku portfelli andmist ja Antonio Tajani volinikuks nimetamist.
Environmental quality standards (EQS), which take the form of maximum allowable concentrations and annual average values, for 33 pollutants like pesticides, heavy metals and others are proposed.
Jacques Barrot pädevusvaldkonna muutmise poolt hääletas 489, vastu 52 ja erapooletuks jäi 19 saadikud.
These substances may endanger the survival of ecosystems, and via the food chain, human health, says the report drafted by Anne Laperrouze (ALDE, FR).
Antonio Tajani volinikuks nimetamise poolt hääletas 507, vastu 53 ja erapooletuks jäi 64 saadikut.
C easing or phasing out emissions, discharges and losses of "priority hazardous substances" will be required by 2018.
Volinike kuulamine parlamendis leidis aset esmaspäeval, 16. juunil.
In order to classify these 13 new substances as "priority" or "hazardous" ones, the Commission will make a new legislative proposal in 2011.
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2008-0290 0 NOT XML V0//ET
Inventory of discharges, maps if available
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-008-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-009-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Meetmed nafta hinna tõusu vastu
MEPs adopt legislation on higher safety standards for road infrastructure
Täiskogu arutas võimalikke nafta hinna tõusu vastu võetavaid meetmeid.
The aim is to establish EU-wide standards on road infrastructure management.
Nii nõukogu kui ka komisjon nentisid, et eelkõige tuleb keskenduda alternatiivsetele energiaallikatele ja energiatõhususele.
Safety standards for roads, in particular in road design maintenance, differ greatly between the Member States.
Mitmed saadikud leidsid, et komisjon ja nõukogu on lubamatult passiivsed.
To raise standards, the draft directive provides for impact assessments of the effect of road building on safety, safety audits and inspections, and improved safety in the existing road network.
Ta lisas, et nõukogu on vastu "moonutavatele maksumeetmetele" ning nentis lõpetuseks, et "odava energia ajastu on läbi".
The EP rapporteur is Helmuth Markov (GUE/NGL, DE) and was adopted with 498 votes in favour, 8 against and 6 abstentions.
Komisjoni kõnevoor Andris PIEBALGS kinnitas, et ta kontrollib igal hommikul nafta hinda.
The substance of the legislation is contained in the annexes to the directive but, under the compromise, these will be non-binding on Member States.
Piebalgs tunnistas, et kõrgemad naftahinnad tekitavad inflatsiooni ja see mõjutab kõiki elanikke.
Road signs MEPs say that Member States must ensure that signs are in place to warn road users of road infrastructure segments that are undergoing repairs and which may thus jeopardise the safety of road users.
Ta märkis ka, et keskenduda tuleb alternatiivsetele energiaallikatele ning energiatõhususele.
Roadside parking Parliament underlines that sufficient roadside parking areas are very important not only for crime prevention but also for road safety.
Marco CAPPATO (ALDE, IT) leidis, et hinnapiiranguid ei ole vaja kehtestada ning et selle asemel oleks vaja ambitsioonikamaid energiatõhususe eesmärke.
The regulation replaces the Directive 2005/66/EC and the Directive 2003/102/EC, some of whose requirements have now been deemed by an independent study not to be feasible.
Ta märkis ka, et gaasiturg näitab, et Euroopa valitsused ei soovi tõelist konkurentsipoliitikat.
The new standards relate essentially to a number of performance tests that vehicles and frontal protection systems are required to pass, and the compulsory introduction of brake assistance systems.
"Ärgem palugem Euroopal lahendada probleeme, mille põhjustajaks on rahvuslikud poliitikud," ütles ta lõpetuseks.
Differentiated timetables for the introduction of these standards will apply to "new vehicles" (new cars made under an existing design) and "new vehicle types" (cars made under new, not yet existent, designs).
Claude TURMES (Greens/EFA, LU) leidis, et kütusehinna tõusu vastu tuleks koheselt võtta meetmeid, nt tuleb maksustada spekuleerimine.
In particular, MEPs have successfully pushed for the new requirements to be introduced more quickly than the Commission had proposed.
Ka tema rõhutas energiatõhususe olulisust.
The main points covered by the agreement are as follows:
Gintaras DIDŽIOKAS (UEN, LT) märkis, et hiljutised streigid näitavad, et kodanikud ei ole rahul Euroopa Liidu tegevusetusega.
In addition, thanks to MEPs, no time distinction is to be allowed between lighter and heavier cars as far as the introduction of BAS is concerned.
Ta tahtis teada, kuidas komisjon õigustab oma sõnumit, et kodanikud peavad lihtsalt suurenevate hindadega harjuma?
Under the Commission's proposal, manufacturers of certain types of SUV would have had more time to comply.
Soovimatus muuta maksupoliitikat ei ole tema arvates õigustatud ning ta leidis, et tuleb olla paindlikum.
- Frontal protection systems (FPS), better known as bull bars, will have to pass the same performance tests as the vehicles on which they are intended to be installed.
Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS (GUE7NGL, EL) leidis, et riigieelarved saavad hinnatõusust kasu ning et seda lisaraha tuleks kasutada selleks, et leevendada hinnatõusu mõju kõige haavatavametele gruppidele.
- With regard to collision avoidance systems (for example, future technology such as infra-red systems that can identify pedestrians and other obstacles and avoid collisions with them more reliably than the car driver), it was agreed that once any such a system is developed, the EU co-legislators (EP and Council) will have the right to assess the effective potential of this active safety measure, and that there will be no automatic trade-off between passive safety requirements and anti-collision systems.
Audio, 18:22, ingliskeelne Audio, 13:22, ingliskeelne
Directives 2003/102/EC and 2005 Text, as adopted by the EP, will be available here (click on 18 June)
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-007-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-009-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-009-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-011-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Jäätmete raamdirektiiv sai parlamendi toetuse
Intelligent car technology take-up too slow, says European Parliament
Parlament kiitis teisel lugemisel heaks jäätmete raamdirektiivi ettepaneku, mis sisaldab mh jäätmete korduskasutamise ning ringlussevõtu eesmärke 2020. aastaks.
Take-up of intelligent car technologies remains very low, given their potential, says Parliament in an own-initiative report adopted by MEPs.
Kuna nõukoguga jõuti kokkuleppele lõpeb menetlus teise lugemisega.
The House backs plans to roll out the pan-European emergency call system eCall by 2010.
Caroline F. JACKSON i (EPP-ED, UK) raporti vastu võtmisega kiitis parlament heaks Euroopa Komisjoni ettepaneku, mille eesmärgiks on edendada jäätmete vältimist ning ringlussevõtmist ning millega muudetakse 1975. aastast pärinevat jäätmedirektiivi.
In the event of an accident, this system alerts the emergency services automatically, providing the exact location of the vehicle.
Jäätmetekke vältimine Nõukoguga saavutatud kompromissi kohaselt peavad liikmesriigid koostama jäätmekavad.
If fully deployed across the EU, eCall technology, combined with the 112 emergency number, could save up to 2,500 lives a year.
Hiljemalt viie aasta möödudes pärast direktiivi jõustumist peavad liikmesriigid koostama konkreetseid eesmärke sisaldavad jäätmetekke vältimise programmid.
The report calls on the 14 Member States that have yet to sign a Memorandum of Understanding on the system's introduction to do so by mid-2008.
Komisjon peab lisaks vajaduse korral esitama 2014. aasta lõpuks jäätmetekke vältimise ja lahutamise eesmärgid 2020. aastaks.
The Commission is also asked to further develop the regulatory framework for the full harmonisation of 112 emergency call standards and for EU-wide eCall technology using 112.
Lisaks peab Euroopa Komisjon enne 2020. aastat eesmärgid läbi vaatama ning neid vajadusel karmistama või laiendama teistele jäätmevoogudele (nt tööstusjäätmed).
MEPs also asked the European Commission to develop a methodology for measuring the impact of Information and communication technologies (ICTs) on CO2 emissions, arguing that this could help to cut fuel consumption and emissions.
Osad saadikud ei pooldanud jäätmete põletamise klassifitseerimist taaskasutamistoiminguna, ent enamik toetas siiski nõukogu ja Euroopa Komisjoni arvamust, et teatud tingimustel võib seda teha.
The proposed Directive aims to simplify and update the existing dangerous goods rules and at the same time extend the scope of the current rules by including inland waterways.
Täiskogu poolt heaks kiidetud teksti kohaselt võib jäätmete põletamist pidada taaskasutamistoiminguks (Vs. jäätmete kõrvaldamine) juhul, kui täidetakse teatud jäätmete põletamise tõhususe kriteeriumeid, mis on ära toodud direktiivi lisas.
The proposal also endorses a user-friendly single set of rules for the inland transport of dangerous goods in the European Union.
Saadikud saavutasid siiski selle, et energiatõhususe sätted tuleb kuue aasta jooksul pärast direktiivi jõustumist kaasotsustamismenetluse raames läbi vaadata.
The proposed directive will make an important contribution to ensuring the safety and security of the transport of dangerous goods in the European Union.
Direktiiv sisaldab lisaks sätteid kõrvalsaaduste ja biojäätmete kohta ning selles laiendatakse tootja vastutust.
It updates the existing four directives and four Commission decisions on this issue and merges them into one piece of legislation.
Taustateave Igal aastal toodetakse Euroopa Liidus umbes 3,5 tonni tahkeid jäätmeid inimese kohta, kokku 1,8 miljardit tonni ning jäätmete hulk inimese kohta aina kasvab.
Parliament's vote approved the common position where the Council introduced several modifications, which are summarised as follows:
Eestis tekkis 2003. aastal 18,4 miljonit tonni jäätmeid ehk 13,6 tonni inimese kohta, sh 418 kg majapidamisjäätmeid.
those Member States which have no railway systems will be exempted from transposing and implementing the proposed directive, insofar as rail is concerned;
2005. aastal läks 49% jäätmetest ELis prügimäele, 18% põletati ning vaid 27% läks ringlusse või kompostiks.
all Member States, which have no inland waterways or whose inland waterways are not linked to those of other Member States, will be given the possibility of not applying the Directive, insofar as inland waterway transport of dangerous goods is concerned;
Eestis läks 2003. aastal prügimäele 65% jäätmetest.
a transitional period of up to two years for the application of inland waterways;
Caroline F. JACKSON (EPP-ED, UK) Dokument: A6-0162/2008 Menetlus: Kaasotsustamismenetlus (***II) Arutelu: 16.06.2008 Hääletus: 17.06.2008
provisions provided for to allow sufficient time for the adoption of national provisions, the establishment of legal frameworks and the training of personnel.
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-008-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-011-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-010-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080613BRI31573 ITEM-013-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Puhas pinnavesi 2018. aastaks
High oil prices: structural causes, speculation and taxes debated by MEPs