natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pärast kultuuripealinna valimist tuleb edaspidi kontrollietapp, mille käigus hoolitsetakse kultuuriprogrammile kehtestatud kriteeriumide täitmise eest ja antakse erialast nõu ja abi.
The major innovation is the introduction of a monitoring phase after a city has been designated as a 'Capital of Culture' to ensure respect of the criteria established for the cultural programme and also to give advice and support to the city concerned.
Samuti otsustati, et kui programmil on piisav Euroopa lisandväärtus, siis antakse selle eest rahaline auhind, mis makstakse välja kõige hiljem kolm kuud enne kultuuripealinna aasta algust.
The text also specifies details of the role of the selection panel and says that the prize, in the form of a financial allocation from the Commission, should be awarded at least seven months before the beginning of the event.
Parlamendiliikmed soovivad samuti, et endised ning tulevased kultuuripealinnad teeksid suuremat koostööd ning et leiaks aset parimate tavade levitamine.
It also makes appropriate changes to deal with the forthcoming accession of Romania and Bulgaria, adding them to the list for 2007 and 2019 respectively.
Komisjon esitles teenustedirektiivi muudetud ettepanekut
It's back to the future on the Services Directive - MEPs react to new proposal
Komisjon esitles täna parlamendile muudetud ettepanekut siseturu teenuste direktiivi kohta ning teatist "Töötajate lähetamine seoses teenuste osutamisega".
MEPs had a first opportunity to react to the Commission's revised proposals on the services directive, when Commissioners Charlie McCreevy and Vladimir Spidla outlined their new draft to the House.
Nii kaasati parlamendi muudatused artiklile 16 (teenuste osutamise vabadus) ning artiklile 17 (erandid teenuste osutamise vabaduse põhimõttest).
Article 16 on freedom to provide services and article 17 on derogations to that freedom were taken on board.
Näiteks on ettepanekust välja jäetud kõik tervishoiuteenused ning komisjon esitab tulevikus tervishoiusektori jaoks eraldi ettepaneku.
All healthcare services had been excluded, and the Commission would be taking a separate initiative on the health sector.
Samuti on välja jäetud ajutist tööd vahendavad agentuurid, turvateenused ning audiovisuaalteenused.
Temporary work agencies, security services and the audiovisual sector had also been excluded.
Samas ei jäetud haldusalast välja õigusteenuseid, kuna artikkel 3 sätestab niikuinii, et sektoraalse õigusakti ning teenustedirektiivi vastuolu puhul kehtib esimene.
He said legal services had not been excluded, on the grounds that article 3 already indicated that specific directives would prevail in cases of conflict.
Avaliku võimu teostamisega seotud lõigu sõnastus viidi kooskõlla EÜ lepingu artikliga 45.
A new communication on social services of general interest would be issued within a few weeks.
Samuti täpsustab komisjon, et erandid sotsiaalhoolekande osas puudutavad sotsiaaleluasemeid, lastehoidu ning perekondade ja isikute abistamist siis, kui neid teenuseid pakub riik või riigi poolt määratud osapool.
" The decision to remove all interaction with labour law has been a major help in improving the atmosphere of this debate.
Ka esitab komisjon mõne nädala jooksul teatise sotsiaalsektori üldhuviteenuste kohta, mis peegeldab antud teenuste olulisust kodanike jaoks.
It removes the perception – which was in any case mistaken – that there is a threat to labour standards.
Uuest ettepanekust eemaldati ka tööõigusega seotud punktid ehk esialgsed artiklid 24 ja 25 (töötajate lähetamine).
Articles 24 and 25 have been removed, and the Commission has prepared a communication on the posting of workers to address the issues covered by these articles .”
Tööhõive ning sotsiaalasjade volinik Vladimír ŠPIDLA tutvustas parlamendile töötajate lähetamise teatist.
Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Vladimir SPIDLA set out the contents of a Commission communication on the posting of workers.
Ta selgitas, et komisjoni eesmärgiks on võimaldada teenuste osutamise vabadust ning ennetada sotsiaalset dumpingut.
The aim is to have freedom to provide services and to prevent social dumping .”
Teatises selgitatakse tema sõnul seda, milliseid kontrollimeetmeid liikmesriigid saavad kasutada tööstandardite tagamiseks.
The communication, he said, set out what control measures Member States can use to check on working standards.
Näiteks sätestab see tingimused nõutud dokumentide osas ning esindaja kohaloleku osas sihtriigis.
It set out various measures including the documents required and the need for a representative in the host country.
Teatise kohaselt on vaja vaid hädavajalikke dokumente.
“There is much room for improvement in all areas, in websites and other information tools, in monitoring bodies and in the exchange of documents .”
Fraktsioonide kõnevoor:
Political Group speakers
Marianne THYSSEN (EPP-ED, BE) sõnul on komisjon täitnud oma lubaduse ja uues ettepanekus suuresti arvestanud parlamendi soovidega.
For the EPP-ED group, Marianne THYSSEN (BE) said she was not at all displeased with progress of events: “ We have set the tone in the plenary debate and called for a balanced text, and we supported radical changes to original commission proposal.
Nii jäetakse üldise majandushuvi teenused direktiivi haldusalasse, aga eraldi süsteemi alusel.
Parliament has had hearty congratulations from the Council for finding a way open to keep the market functioning and to preserve our social achievements .”
Thyssen avaldas ka lootust, et nõukogu saavutab nüüd kokkuleppe, mis on kasulik FIEdele, teenuste pakkujatele, tarbijatele, töötajatele ning sobiv majanduskasvu ja uute töökohtade loomise jaoks.
“We know a balance is possible – the issue will be further addressed and we are sure the Austrian presidency will achieve a directive which is good for employers, consumers and workers – and for growth and jobs."
Evelyne GEBHARDT (PSE, DE) avaldas heameelt selle üle, et komisjon võttis oma uues ettepanekus parlamendi soove arvesse.
For the Socialist group, Evelyne GEBHARDT (DE) said the Commission had “ leapt beyond the shadow from which is suffered last week .”
Tema sõnul on sellega tehtud suur samm sotsiaalse Euroopa poole, eelkõige kuna "päritolumaa põhimõte" jäeti välja.
This was a decisive step, she said, towards a social Europe: “ The country of origin principle has been swept aside.
Samuti avaldas Gebhardt rahulolu teatud sektorite direktiivi haldusalast välja jätmise üle.
This is most important for social Europe .”
Samas tuleb tema arvates uurida sotsiaalteenuste ettepanekut.
She was pleased that sensitive sectors were being excluded, though she said the social services issue would need further discussion.
Ka see, et sektoraalsed direktiivid on ülimuslikud, on tema sõnul tervitatav.
“ We have been able to prove that we have exercised our rights to the benefit of citizens.
Gebhardt rõhutas, et "saadikud on võidelnud Euroopa kodanike õiguste eest edukalt ning nüüd peab nõukogu sama tegema" .
It is now up to the Council to deal with this and determine how rapidly we will have this legislation .”
Toine MANDERS (ALDE, NL) tänas volinikke esmalt kiire töö eest.
Speaking for the ALDE group, Toine MANDERS (NL) thanked the Commission for providing the text so rapidly.
Ta ütles, et liberaalide arvates on töökohtade loomine parim sotsiaalkindlustus.
He said this directive was a major step forward for employment in Europe.
Siseriikliku turu kaitsmine liikmesriikide poolt on liberaalide arvates protektsionism.
“ Creating jobs is the best thing for social security – it is far better than protecting at all costs our so called social achievements .”
Samas peaks Mandersi sõnul täpsustama definitsioone selles osas, millised sektorid on kaasatud ja millised mitte.
He was disappointed at the length of the list of excluded areas, which he said were areas where protectionism could continue.
Manders rõhutas, et Euroopa suudab teiste turgudega võistelda ainult siis, kui teenusteturg liberaliseeritakse.
You can see what happens in France when you try to introduce reforms to preserve our prosperity for our children...
Pierre JONCKHEER (Verts/ALE, BE) tervitas komisjoni muudetud ettepanekut, ent leidis, et teatud probleemid on lahendamata ka uues ettepanekus.
Pierre JONCKHEER (BE), for the Greens / European Free Alliance Group said he was pleased that the Commission had taken into account the suggestions of the Parliament and the Council.
Ta viitas üldise majandushuvi teenuste kaasamisele, mis roheliste arvates peaks olema hõlmatud eraldi direktiiviga.
However, he said that his Group still had problems with the scope of the Directive and the Inclusion of Services of General Interest.
Samuti avaldas ta rahulolematust artikliga 16, kus Euroopa Kohtule jääb ikka liiga suur tõlgendamisruum.
Mr Jonckheer also said that agreement on Article 16 does not in their view present a sound legal basis.
Ta ütles siiski, et näha on, et parlament on kaalu juurde saanud.
He added that his Group would " examine the Commission proposals under a microscope ".
Wurtzi sõnul juhindutakse ettepanekus aga ikka veel turu liberaliseerimisest ning mitte suuremast solidaarsusest.
He did however say that the changes showed the growing importance of the Parliament in the EU's institutional triangle and the weight of the people who had demonstrated against the Directive.
Adam Jerzy BIELAN (UEN, PL) avaldas ettepaneku üle pettumust.
He noted that under the proposals the rules of integration were still led by freedom of the market and not a wider solidarity.
Ta ütles, et uues ettepanekus on palju " umbmääraseid väljendeid ", mida tema arvates hakatakse uute liikmesriikide vastu ära kasutama.
Adam Jerzy BIELAN (PL), on behalf of the UEN Group, said that he " could not hide his disappointment " and that the amended version was full of " ambiguous statements " which will be tested by opponents of the liberal market.
"Uus direktiiv peegeldab 15 "vana" liikmesriigi lühinägelikku ning isekat hoiakut," ütles ta.
He criticised the " short-sighted and selfish attitude " of some leaders of the "old" EU-15 in their opposition to open markets and labour mobility.
Bielani sõnul on raske mõista komisjoni passiivsust, sest too peaks ju aitama kaasa Lissaboni eesmärkide saavutamisele.
He also criticised the " passive and apathetic " Commission for not acting in the Union's interest.
Ta lisas, et artiklid 24 ja 25, mis pidid tööliste lähetamise takistused eemaldama, kustutati ise.
Finally, on Article 24/25 he said that the better solutions promised by the Commission were merely the "status quo".
Bielani arvates on uue ettepaneku näol tegemist häbiväärse kompromissiga.
The proposed text, he said, "certainly isn't a diluted and weak legislation".
Finantsperspektiivi osas saavutati tagasihoidlik edu
EU budget 2007-2013: a deal is done - €4 billion more but some dissatisfaction
Parlament nõudis summa suurendamist ning ka kulutuste struktuuri muutmist ning see ka saavutati, ehkki väiksemas ulatuses, kui saadikud oleksid soovinud.
As you are aware, Parliament had set a number of cumulative and quantitative objectives for the financial perspective, namely an increase in overall resources and an improved structure and improved modes of implementation for the budget.
Eelarvet suurendati Ülemkogul kokku lepituga võrreldes 4 miljardi euro võrra (täpsem info artikli lõpus).
With respect to the Council's position of December, the ceiling has been raised by EUR 4 bn of 'fresh money', to be added to the resources of certain programmes which would have suffered severe cuts.
President ütles, et eile õhtul toimunud finantsperspektiivi neljanda kolmepoolse kohtumise tulemusel said lisaraha sellised varem alafinantseeritud, ent samas Euroopa jaoks prioriteetsed valdkonnad nagu Erasmuse programm, elukestev õpe, teadusuuringud, innovatsioon ja VKEd.
These include Erasmus, the lifelong learning programmes, innovation and aids to SMEs.
Euroopa Investeerimispanga garantiifondile antakse 2,5 miljardit juurde, seeläbi saab suurendada üleeuroopaliste võrgustike ning VKEde rahastamist.
To these additional resources should be added an increase of EUR 2500 m in the EIB's reserves, to fund programmes in the fields of R&D, transport networks and aids to small businesses.
Parlamendi eelarve raportöör Reimer BÖGE (EPP-ED, DE) ütles, et ta pole tulemusega rahul.
Parliament's rapporteur Reimer BÖGE (EPP-ED, DE) said he was not satisfied with this result.
Böge sõnul ei jõutud detailanalüüsi, laienenud ELi ning ajutise komisjoni tööd arvesse võttes nende tulemusteni, mida oleks vaja Euroopa lisandväärtuse jaoks.
The Financial Perspective for the enlarged Europe and what was needed in terms of added value had vanished, he said.
Siiski jõudsid kõik institutsioonid tema sõnul oma piirideni, et institutsioonidevahelist kokkulepet saavutada.
However, he said, “ in current circumstances we have reached the very limits for an acceptable solution.
Böge sõnul oli kvalitatiivne edasiminek enam-vähem rahuldav ning meil on nüüd parem eelarvepoliitika.
As far as the figures are concerned, all sides have reached the pain threshold .”
Elukestvale õppele ja konkurentsivõimele nähakse ette 2,1 miljardit rohkem ehk 40 000 üliõpilast rohkem saab osaleda vahetusprogrammides.
There was, he said, more funding for Life Long Learning and competitiveness and an additional 40,000 students would be able to take part in European exchanges.
Fraktsioonide voor:
He congratulated all involved.
Ta ütles, et parlamendil on suur vastutus ELi ees, sest me ei räägi ainult rahast, vaid demokraatiast.
“ This is not just about the figures, it is also about sound financial management principles, transparency, accountability and the quality of the way we work together .”
Ta nõudis, et 2008/2009 oleks parlament eelarve läbivaatamisse kaasatud.
“ We are not entirely happy, but we know that more could not be achieved .”
Viimase mõne kuu jooksul toimunu ei tohi tema sõnul korduda.
He too praised the EP negotiating team.
Me peame vaatama, kuidas saab liidule anda omavahendid, ilma et see kahjustaks kodanikke.
He called for national authorities to shoulder their responsibility for proper handling of EU funds, not just blaming the EU for any deficiencies.
Martin SCHULZ (PSE, DE) ütles oma sõnavõtus, et saime vähem kui soovisime, ent rohkem kui julgesime loota.
For the Socialist group, Martin SCHULZ (DE) said that while the agreement was “ less that what we wanted, it was more than many expected.
Tegemist on aga mõistuse võiduga.
It was a victory for common sense. ”
Schulz ütles, et 2008 vaadatakse raamistik läbi, nii et rahulolematud peavad mõistma, et tegemist on osaga ELi eelarve reformist.
He said the review clause was especially valuable.
Usaldusväärne finantsjuhtimine on kokkuleppes olulisel kohal ja kõik on lubanud seda põhimõtet järgida.
He noted the Commission had undertaken to present proposal for the review.
Samuti on kokkuleppe oluline osa see, et liikmesriikide vastutus suureneb - nad peavad tõestama, et nad on raha mõistlikult kulutanud.
He looked forward to improved financial management, saying the EU must spend money properly – and that there was a general agreement to make progress.
Samuti on usaldusväärsuse tagasivõitmiseks vaja tagada, et eelarve täitmise aruanded saaksid tulevikus kinnitatud.
I know if is fashionable in some national capitals to pour cold water on our common endeavour... if the central force for developing our Union is no longer visionary leadership from within, then perhaps developments beyond our borders will persuade us to provide the Union with the resources we need .”
Monica FRASSONI (Verts/ALE, IT) sõnas, et rohelised ei ole kokkuleppega rahul ning ei usu, et poleks olnud võimalik rohkem saavutada.
On behalf of the Greens, Monica FRASSONI (IT) declared that they were "not terribly pleased" with the agreement and not particularly convinced that the Parliament could not have got more.
Tema sõnul on põhiprobleem sama: liikmesriigid ei soovi maksta selle eest, mida EL peaks tegema.
She noted how the "basic problem is the same: the unwillingness by MEPs to pay for what's necessary in the EU" .
Finantsperspektiiv on konservatiivse ülesehitusega.
She thanked the negotiating team, whilst noting that it was entirely composed of men.
Näiteks Natura 2000 ei saa piisavalt raha.
Ms. Frassoni spoke of her concerns that the revision clause was not included in the agreement, she asked what the fate of this clause will be and what the EU decision making process will be in terms of its external progress.
Francis WURTZ (GUE/NGL, FR) ütles oma sõnavõtus, et eelarve väljendab meie poliitilist tahet ja seetõttu ei ole õiglane reklaamida ambitsioonikaid eesmärke, kui me selleks raha ei taha anda.
Francis WURTZ (GUE/NGL, FR) said that the EU budget is "not the only instrument to foster plans for development and growth", suggesting the Central Bank as an example of another instrument.
Wurtzi sõnul oli juba enne laienemist teada, et selleks on vaja uut raha, suurendada tõukefondide ning Ühtekuuluvusfondi rahastamist.
He described the budget as "an expression of political will" and in correlation, mentioned the lack of Members' States willingness to pay for the political decisions they take, suggesting enlargement, the structural funds and the cohesion funds as examples of this.
Ent sellest hoolimata rahastamist vähendatakse.
Mr. Wurtz noted the "dreadful effects on research and cooperation" that the rejection of the December compromise - "a negative compromise " - had.
Ta avaldas arvamust, et kokkulepe on ebarahuldav ning tuleb seega tagasi lükata.
He considered the Parliaments' budgetary demands to be "very modest indeed" and accordingly advised: "we have to reject this farce, we have to be responsible" .
Wojciech ROSZKOWSKI (UEN, PL) ütles samuti, et kokkulepe on pettumustvalmistav.
Wojciech ROSZKOWSKI (UEN, PL) spoke of his mixed feelings.
Tema sõnul peaksid sissetulekud 2007-2013 suurenema 15%, ent kulutused suurenevad vaid 2%.
He talked firstly of his relief that a decision has been made after 15 months, and that the pressure on EU finances is behind us.
Seega kodanike soovidele ei vastata ja kodanikud uutest liikmesriikidest kindlasti ei mõista kulutuste vähendamist.
Consequently he said that he could almost understand the Euro-scepticism and Europhobia, mentioning the stinginess of Member States.
Ta avaldas arvamust, et kui rahastamist ei suurendata, siis ootab Euroopat tume tulevik.
He declared that his group "will support this proposal", warning however that "if we are below the threshold in the annual budgets, the future of the Union is black" .
Nigel Paul FARAGE (IND/DEM, UK) küsis, kas me ikka kõneleme asjadest, millest peaks rääkima - Kontrollikoda on 11 aastat järjest keeldunud eelarve täitmise aruannet kinnitamast ning kas meil on üldse vaja eelarvet?
Nigel FARAGE (UK) for the Independence and Democracy group, opened by saying that the EU was "indulging in its favourite sport and past-time, that of navel-gazing".
Ta esitas ka küsimuse, miks peavad Briti maksumaksjad maksma metroo ehitamise eest Varssavis ning ütles, et mõne aasta pärast ei saa EL enam Ühendkuningriigist raha.
He wondered when Members would start "addressing the real issues of the EU budget", declaring it to be "totally flawed" and asking "do we need a budget at all?".
Euroopa Naabrus- ja Partnerlusinstrument
President Borrell's conclusion to the debate
Samuti otsustati, et paindlikkusinstrumendiga ette nähtud 200 miljonit eurot aastas saab kasutamata jäämise puhul kasutada veel kahe järgneva aasta jooksul (n+2 põhimõte).
In concluding the debate, President Borrell said: " The political groups have expressed different degrees of dissatisfaction.
tuleb parandada programmide ning liidu eelarve rakendamist finantsmäärustiku lisatavate põhimõtete alusel;
We are sure that the future of the Union depends on it , with better budgets to reach the Union 's objectives .
Euroopa ja Vahemeremaade dialoogi tugevdamine
Reinforcing Euro-Mediterranean dialogue
EP President Borrell and Tuneesia Saadikutekoja Presiden­t Mebazaa
EP President Borrell and President of the Tunisian Chamber of Deputies Mebazaa
Seekordse istungiga lõppes Euroopa Parlamendi presidentuur assamb­lees.
This session marked the end of the European Parliament's presidency of the Assembly.
EP president Josep Borrell ütles kohtu­misel, et “ ta ei taipa siiani täielikult Vahe­mere piirkonna probleemide komplekssust, mis on inimkonna ees seisvate probleemide kontsentraat .”
At the meeting EP President Josep Borrell said he "still did not fully understand all the complexities of the Mediterranean, which is a concentrate of all the problems facing humanity."
Ta oli siiski “ rohkem veendu­nud kui kunagi varem, et Euroopa suhted islamimaailmaga saavad järgnevatel aasta­tel Euroopa peamiseks katsumuseks ”, selgitades, et Vahemerepiirkond on ühest küljest “ äärmiselt dünaamiline ”, kuid teisest küljest “ muutub üha hapramaks ”.
However, he was "more convinced than ever that Europe's relations with the Muslim world will be the major challenge facing Europe in the years ahead", explaining that the Mediterranean region is on the one hand "extremely dynamic" and on the other hand "becoming increasingly fragile".
Oluline foorum aruteluks
Important forum for discussion
EMPA on osa Barcelona protsessist, mis käivitati 1995. aastal ja mille eesmärgiks on olla Vahemere kahel kaldal elavaid koda­nikke lähendavaks juhtivaks jõuks.
EMPA is part of the Barcelona-process, launched in 1995, and it aims to play a strong role in bringing citizens from the two shores of the Mediterranean closer to one another.
Organi­satsiooni lähenemisviis on vastandamise atmosfääri asendamine dialoogiga.
Its approach is to replace an atmosphere of confrontation with one of dialogue.
Tege­mist on olulise tõsiste arutelude fooru­miga ja pea ainus võimalus Palestiina ja Iisraeli esindajate kohtumiseks võrdsetena.
It is an important forum for in-depth discussions and almost the only opportunity for Palestinian and Israeli representatives to meet as equals.
240 liikmest koosnev EMPA koondab Euroopa Parlamendi ja ELi riiklike parlamentide liikmeid ning Vahemerepiirkonna 10 ELi partnerriigi (Alžeeria, Egiptus, Iisrael, Liibanon, Jordaania, Maroko, Palestiina Omavalitsus, Süüria, Tuneesia ja Türgi) parlamentide saadikuid.
The 240-strong EMPA brings together Members of the European Parliament, EU national parliaments and parliaments of the EU's 10 partner countries around the Mediterranean (Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Morocco, Palestinian Authority, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey).
Hr Borrell selgitas, et “ meie eesmärk on luua “tsivilisatsioonide liit” ajal, mil mõned inimesed soovivad toetada “tsivilisat­siooni­de kokkupõrget ”.
Mr Borrell explained that "our aim is to establish an 'Alliance of Civilisations' at the very time when some people are seeking to promote a 'Clash of Civilisations'".
Anna Lindhi Euroopa – Vahemerepiirkonna Kultuuridevahelise Dia­loogi Fondi loomine on oluline samm selles suunas.
The creation of the “Anna Lindh Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue between Cultures” is an example of an important action in this direction.
Fond toetab kultuuridevahelist dia­loogi ja soodustab Euroopa – Vahemere partnerlust intellektuaalse, kultuurilise ja kogukondliku vahetuse kaudu.
The Foundation promotes the dialogue between cultures and contributes to the visibility of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership through intellectual, cultural and civil society exchanges.
Kui puhkes kriis prohvet Muhamedi kuju­tavate Taani karikatuuride üle, oli EMPA juhatus esimene Euroopa ja Araabia ühendatud organisatsioon, kes sellel teemal ühel häälel rääkis.
When the crisis over the Danish cartoons of prophet Mohammed broke out, the EMPA Bureau was the first joint European and Arab body to speak on the subject with a single voice.
EMPA mõistis sel nädalal tugevalt hukka “ kõik usuliste veendumuste vastu suunatud solvangud ” ja soovis, et valitsused “ tagaksid usuliste veendumuste austamise (...) ja soodustak­sid tolerantsust, vabadust ja multikultuur­seid väärtuseid ”.
EMPA this week strongly condemned "any offences against religious values" and urged governments "to ensure respect for religious beliefs…and to promote the values of tolerance, freedom and multiculturalism".