natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta leidis, et lepingus peaks pädevused olema selgemalt jagatud ning et kodanike ja rahvusparlamentide roll peab olema suurem.
Frank VANHECKE (ITS, BE) said that the Reform Treaty was being "forced down our throats" and totally undemocratic.
Dauli sõnul on tähtsust sisul ja edusammudel, mitte vormil.
The EU, he said, was causing a "brain-drain from poor African countries".
Ta tõi esile, et me ei taha superriiki, vaid supertõhusaid institutsioone, mis on võimelised otsuseid langetama.
Maciej Marian GIERTYCH (NI, PL) said that the substance of the Reform Treaty and the Constitutional Treaty were much the same.
Katsed blokeerida ELi otsuseprotsessi tuleb keelata.
The "lower ranking" of the document was a way to avoid referenda.
Martin SCHULZ (PSE, DE) märkis, et Lissabonis tuleb asjad ära otsustada ja tuleb asuda lepingu ratifitseerimisele kõikides liikmesriikides.
Opt-out, opt-in, shake it all about, the British Government will claim victory, others will publicly indulge them, knowing that any apparent concessions are really without any substance.
Võrreldes valitsustevaheliste konverentsi mandaadiga on erinevusi tema arvates suhteliselt vähe ning see on positiivne.
All this is to con the British public into believing that the Reform Treaty is actually materially different from the rejected Constitution, when patently it is not.
Schulz rõhutas, et ratifitseerimisel on saadikutel suur roll ning nad peavad tegutsema.
Now that Mr Gordon Brown has bottled out of an election, the need for a British referendum is greater than ever.
Kui lepingut ei ratifitseerita, siis Euroopa Liit oma praegusel kujul enam Schulzi sõnul ei eksisteeri.
No referendum means no mandate for Mr Brown to proceed to ratification, and that is the bottom line upon which all democrats in the United Kingdom should unite.
Graham R. WATSON (ALDE, UK) sõnas, et Portugali peaminister peab jääma ustavaks Euroopa vajadustele ning ei tohi järele anda.
Timothy KIRKHOPE (EPP-ED, UK) thanked the Council and Commission for their statements.
Ta rõhutas, et väikseima ühise nimetaja poliitika kasutamisest ei piisa ning et asjadele tuleb hakata mõtlema ELi seisukohast lähtuvalt.
The Lisbon informal summit is going to be a crucial event, having had the publication of the draft Reform Treaty which Heads of State and Government will focus on when they meet there.
Konrad SZYMAŃSKI (UEN, PL) arvas, et tuleb endalt küsida, kas on õige hetk Poolat ja Ühendkuningriiki rünnata?
The proposals are of course, as has been said by other speakers, very much the same as those contained in the original constitutional text.
Ta lisas, et mõned kardavad valitsustevahelise konverentsi tulemusi ning et kõikidel riikidel on õigus jälgida poliitilist protsessi Euroopa Liidus.
For the past few weeks he has encouraged his Ministers to talk up prospects of an election in the UK and then when the political going got rough, he backed down.
Ta märkis, et endine Saksa president Herzog küsis samuti, kas Saksamaa on veel demokraatia, kui nii palju tema õigusaktidest võetakse vastu väljaspool Bundestagi.
I think his European colleagues, fellow European leaders, should be very careful that whatever he says in Lisbon, he is likely to mean something completely different.
Monica FRASSONI (Verts/ALE, IT) avaldas arvamust, et reformileping ei tundu olevat kasutajasõbralik ning et kodanikke ei taheta kaasata, vaid vastupidi.
If the Prime Minister continues to resist that pressure, despite a clear election manifesto pledge, then the British people will have further confirmation that he cannot be trusted.
Frassoni leidis, et tegemist on pigem bürokraatliku kui demokraatliku tekstiga ning et läbipaistvus ei ole paranenud.
Richard CORBETT (PES, UK) congratulated the Portuguese Presidency on the progress they have made towards securing consensus.
Lõpetuseks märkis ta, et reformileping on parem kui ei midagi, aga mitte parim, mida on võimalik saavutada.
But, of course, we have heard from many colleagues today that there is considerable disappointment in this Parliament.
Francis WURTZ (GUE/NGL, FR) märkis, et tema fraktsioon on uuele lepingule vastu mitte natsionalismi tõttu, vaid seetõttu, et nende põhiküsimustele ei ole vastatud.
There are many who are disappointed at the loss of the idea of a constitution that would have replaced the current treaties and refounded our Union on a new legal base.
Ta viitas sellele, et isikuandmete kaitsega on probleeme, et põhiõiguste harta ei ole kõigile siduv ning et lepingu keel on väga keeruline.
There are others who are disappointed at the numerous changes that have been secured and the special provisions and derogations for certain Member States.
Seetõttu kutsus ta üles laiapõhjalisele arutelule kõikides liikmesriikides ning pidas vajalikuks referendumite läbiviimist.
But they are the price that has to be paid to secure agreement of all 27 countries capable of being ratified by all 27 countries.
Jens-Peter BONDE (IND/DEM, DK) märkis, et reformilepingu teksti on võimatu lugeda ning et selle sisu on sama, mis põhiseaduse lepingul, ainult termineid on muudetud.
That is the situation that we are faced with.
Ta lisas, et kui referendumit läbi ei viida, siis on see silmakirjalik ja väga kahetsusväärne.
There is no way around the fact that this Treaty has to be acceptable to all Member States and ratified by all Member States.
Ta märkis, et Euroopas on juba 20 miljonit töötut, sh sisserännanud, seetõttu ei tohi piire avada.
But, with years more wrangling on the institutions and the mechanics of the European Union.
Samuti korraldame ajude äravoolu vaestest maadest, mis on lubamatu.
All those things for which we need the Union, because alone and separate, we are not effective, but together we can do more.
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-003-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-001-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-005-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-003-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Euroopa Parlamendi koosseisu muutmise ettepanek
Composition of the European Parliament after European elections in June 2009
Parlament tegi otsuse oma uue koosseisu kohta pärast 2009. aasta valimisi.
MEPs adopted a report on the new allocation of seats in the European Parliament after the next legislative elections, in 2009.
Alain LAMASSOURE 'i (EPP-ED, FR) ja Adrian SEVERIN i (PSE, RO) raportis teeb parlament oma ettepaneku selle kohta, kuidas saadikukohad peaksid pärast 2009. aasta valimisi jagunema:
On the following page you will see the allocation of seats in the European Parliament for the 2009-2014 parliamentary term, as proposed by the two co-rapporteurs, Alain Lamassoure (EPP-ED, FR) and Adrian Severin (PES, RO), and which was approved:
2004. aasta valimiste järgselt oli parlamendis 732 saadikut.
(2) "Nice": Distribution of Seats according to Art. 189 TEC as modified by Art. 9 of the BG/RO - Act of Accession.
Bulgaaria ja Rumeenia liitumisega seoses 2007. aastal suurenes saadikute arv ajutiselt 785ni, et valitud saadikutelt kohti mitte ära võtta.
It also proposed that future accessions may be accompanied by a temporary increase over and above the 750-seat ceiling, as was done for Bulgaria and Romania.
Vastavalt praegu kehtivatele reeglitele (muudetud Nizza leping) peaks saadikute arv järgmise koosseisu ajal olema 736.
According to current rules, as laid down by the 2005 Accession Act of Bulgaria and Romania, the number of MEPs should be reduced to 736.
2007. aasta juunikuine Euroopa Ülemkogu kutsus parlamenti aga üles esitama 2007. aasta oktoobriks ettepanek parlamendi tulevase koosseisu kohta, määrates kohtade ülempiiriks 750 liikmekohta.
The draft Reform Treaty lays down that the new composition of the EP will be decided by the European Council acting by unanimity, on the basis of Parliament's proposal and after obtaining its consent.
Seejuures läheb 96 kohta kõige suurema rahvaarvuga riigile ja 6 kohta kõige väiksema rahvaarvuga riigile.
In the approved report, MEPs in the committee call on the Member States to adopt this proposal immediately after the Reform Treaty enters into force.
Nii esindab uue ettepaneku kohaselt nt Eesti saadik 224 000 inimesest, Saksa saadik 858 729 inimest ning Malta saadik 67 333 inimest.
The allocation of seats follows the rules established by the June European Council, which invited the Parliament to present a proposal by October.
Parlamendi esindajatel valitsustevahelisel konverentsil palutakse edastada konverentsile deklaratsiooni eelnõu, milles konverents kutsub parlamenti üles tegema ettepanekut oma liikmete valimise kohta (alates 2014. aastast), milles määratletakse mõiste "kodanikud" täpsemalt kui Euroopa Liidu lepingu artikli 9 a lõikes 2.
Alain LAMASSOURE (EPP-ED, FR) said the future treaty would make the composition of Parliament a matter of secondary law to be decided unanimously by the Council on the basis of a proposal from - and with the assent of - Parliament itself.
Deklaratsioon tuleks lisada valitsustevahelise konverentsi lõppakti.
The Council had asked Parliament to apply this provision ahead of time and "deal with this hot potato".
Reformilepingu projektis öeldakse, et parlamendi uue koosseisu kohta teeb otsuse Euroopa Ülemkogu ühehäälselt, tehes seda parlamendi ettepaneku alusel ja parlamendi nõusolekul.
Now the treaty would set a maximum size of Parliament at 750 members, with each Member State having no more than 96 and no fewer than 6 MEPs.
Parlamendi ettepanekut arutatakse nüüd 18.-19. oktoobril Lissaboni mitteametlikul ülemkogul.
Parliament had been asked to define and apply the principle of "degressive proportionality" to the dividing up of seats.
Alain LAMASSOURE (EPP-ED, FR) selgitas kohtade jaotamise põhimõtteid: esiteks, suurematel riikidel on rohkem kohti, kui väiksematel; teiseks kasutatakse nn kahaneva proportsionaalsuse põhimõtet, mille kohaselt suurema rahvaarvuga liikmesriigi parlamendiliige esindab suuremat arvu kodanikke kui väiksema rahvaarvuga liikmesriigi parlamendisaadik; kolmandaks, et saadikute maksimumarv kasutatakse ära.
By using the ceilings and floors in representation to the full, some current anomalies (like each Spanish MEP representing more citizens than each German one, despite Germany being more populous) could be eliminated.
Tulevikus oleks tema arvates parem leida sobiv matemaatiline valem, aga selleks ei olnud aega.
If the proposal was un-balanced in favour of smaller or larger states, it would not succeed in Council, he said.
Adrian SEVERIN (PSE, RO) märkis, et saadikute arv ei saa lõpmatult suureneda ning et saadikute arv peab sõltuma kodanike arvust.
Adrian SEVERIN (PES, RO) said that if adopted our proposals will mean no more artificial groupings.
Ta märkis, et saadikud esindavad nii kodanikke kui ka riike ning et kahaneva proportsionaalsuse põhimõte on oluline.
They are more representative of demographic realities, and will mean more solidarity between big and small, full legitimacy in relation to civic representation.
Ta kutsus saadikuid üles olema solidaarsed ning "tõelised eurooplased".
He concluded by saying that "I appeal to your sense of European responsibility and European solidarity."
Samuti on Friedrichi arvates vaja pikaks ajaks loogilist süsteemi, mitte iga kord uusi arvutusi.
We should be working towards a logical system for the long-term and stop this endless debate", he stated.
Ta lisas, et ükski riik peale Saksamaa ei kaota kohti ning avaldas üllatust Itaalia seisukohtade üle.
I have accepted that the UK should have one fewer than France; why should not Italy accept that they will have fewer seats than France for the same reason.
Samuti on Itaalia küsimus kodanike ning elanike kohta väga huvitav ja seda peaks uurima.
"I too regret some national delegations seeking to improve their position on the league table but all such proposals are mutually contradictory.
Duff leidis, et ettepanekut tuleb toetada ning valitsustevahelisele konverentsile tuleb viia lahendus, mitte probleem.
Meanwhile let us give solid support to the proposal and send a solution rather than a problem to the IGC."
Brian CROWLEY (UEN, IE) märkis, et ta mõistab, et liikmesriigid ei soovi kohti kaotada, vaid tahavad võimalikult palju kohti saada.
Brian CROWLEY (UEN, IE) said that "ultimately Turkeys don’t vote for Christmas so why would any MEP look to see their seat taken away and there are legitimate reasons to seek their own national numbers maintained.
Institutsioonide ja suurte-väikeste riikide vahel on vaja tema sõnul tasakaalu.
If we look back to changes since 1979 there have been phenomenal demographic and population changes, not least because of so much free movement since the 2004 enlargement of the EU."
Eurostati arvudele toetumise puhul on probleemiks see, et osad liikmesriigid on esitanud ajutised andmed.
When we look at the Eurostat figures being used, out of 27 countries, 15 sets of figures from the national statistical offices are only provisional figures.
Samuti tuleks Crowley arvates mõelda selle peale, mis saab pärast Horvaatia liitumist.
Yet this vote can have a lasting impact; and we also need to look at future enlargement to include Croatia, so I urge caution."
Johannes VOGGENHUBER (Verts/ALE, AT) märkis, et tema fraktsioon ei toeta raportit, sest selles ei arvestata elementaarsete demokraatlike õigustega ning kinnitatakse ajaloolisi ebavõrdsusi.
The Greens/EFA group would not approve the report, because it "breaches elementary principles of fairness and perpetuates historical inequalities", said Johannes VOGGENHUBER (Greens/EFA, AT)
Parlament ei ole tema sõnul sotsiaal-majandusliku võimekuse väljendus, vaid valijate esindaja.
Parliament "represents voters, not the socio-economic capacity of states.
Voggenhuber leidis, et viimast seitset aastat ei ole hästi ära kasutatud parlamendi rolli välja selgitamiseks.
If there is no demos, then there is no parliament", he continued, stressing that citizens' rights to representation do exist - they are enshrined, for example, in the existing treaties, the Charter, Court of Justice decisions and electoral law.
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN (GUE/NGL, DE) väljendas toetust raportile, mis tema arvates esitab tasakaalustatud ning läbipaistva süsteemi.
Personally, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN (GUE/NGL, DE) felt that the report approached the issues in a truly European spirit, and that its proposals constitute a "balanced, easily-graspable system" that can accommodate future enlargement of the Union and takes account of each country's key concerns.
Samas lisas Kaufmann, et tema fraktsioonis on arvamusi seinast seina.
"Only a Socialist from Yorkshire could accept that 2 + 2 = 5", he concluded.
Nõukogu peaks Kaufmanni arvates parlamendi ettepanekut rakendama enne 2009. aasta valimisi.
Luca ROMAGNOLI (ITS, IT) said that the report "should be rejected with scorn as it ignored many facts".
Seejuures tuleks arvestada nii kodanike kui ka liikmesriikides elavate kolmandate riikide kodanike arvu.
Italy, he said, had contributed greatly to the development of the EU.
Bernard Piotr WOJCIECHOWSKI ( IND/DEM, PL) märkis, et selliste raportite puhul alati võideldakse ja siis ilmneb, et Euroopa solidaarsus on suur müüt.
Why for example should Malta and Estonia have the same number of MEPs (6) even though Estonia's population is three times bigger?"
Luca ROMAGNOLI (ITS, IT) leidis, et raport tuleb tagasi lükata.
Proinsias DE ROSSA (PES, IE) stated that once we move away from strict proportionality in elections, we inevitably end up applying political compromise rather than pure mathematics.
Ta märkis, et lahendus on väga Itaalia-vastane ning rõhutas, et saadikukohtade jagamine peaks olema proportsionaalsem.
The democratic principle that all votes should have equal weight is something that cannot be applied until such time as the European Union becomes a fully federal system, he stated
Ta esitas küsimuse, miks Maltal peaks olema sama palju kohti kui Eestil, ehkki Maltal on kolm korda vähem elanikke.
While Mr De Rossa supported it, he stated that he opposed the alternative systems that are being proposed as less fair and less balanced.
Samuti märkis ta, et arvestada tohib ainult kodanike arvu, mitte ei-tea-kust kohale toodud inimeste arvu.
It is the Council that represents the state and not this House, he concluded.
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2007-0429 0 NOT XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-004-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20070910BKG10267 0 NOT XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071010IPR11464 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-004-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-003-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-006-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-005-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Ühise põllumajanduspoliitika vahendite saajad tuleb avalikustada
MEPs give green light to the EU-US Open Sky agreement
Parlament kiitis heaks Euroopa Komisjoni ettepaneku parandada põllumajanduskulude läbipaistvust ja eelarve täitmist.
In a report adopted on 11 October by 513 votes in favour to 15 against, with 35 abstentions, the European Parliament gave its green light to the EC-USA air transport agreement which was signed at the EU-US summit of 30 April 2007 and which the Council endorsed and decided to apply provisionally as from 30 March 2008.
Saadikud teevad siiski ka omapoolseid muudatusettepanekuid läbipaistvuse parandamiseks, tagades samas andmekaitse.
The agreement deals with, inter alia
2006. aastal otsustas Euroopa Liit, et ühise põllumajanduspoliitika (ÜPP) abi saajate nimed tuleks avalikustada.
• The possibility to operate flights beyond the European Union and the United States towards third countries ('5th Freedom') and to operate all-cargo flights beyond the United States to a third country, without a requirement that the service starts in the EU (7th Freedom - All Cargo).
Georgios CHATZIMARKAKIS e (ALDE, DE) konsultatsioonimenetluse raames vastu võetud raportis tervitavad saadikud komisjoni kaua oodatud ettepanekut ning teevad ka omapoolseid soovitusi.
• The possibility for any "Community air carrier" to fly between any point in the EU to any point in the US, without any restrictions on pricing or capacity.
Läbipaistvust edendavad meetmed
This freedom does not exist for the moment.
Parlamendiliikmed soovivad, et riiklikud abi saajate nimekirjad avaldataks Internetis.
• Rights in the area of ownership, investment and control of US airlines by EU investors.
Kui talu näol on tegemist juriidilise isikuga, siis tuleks parlamendiliikmete arvates ära näidata investorite ja juhtkonna ees- ja perekonnanimed.
• A number of access rights for Community airlines to the US 'Fly America' programme for the transport of passengers and cargo financed by the US Federal government.
Samuti soovivad saadikud, et Euroopa Komisjoni veebilehed ühendataks liikmesriikide makseasutuste veebilehtedega.
Such rights have never previously been granted by the United States to a third country.
Hetkel on kolmteist liikmesriiki loonud veebipõhised registrid, mis on ligipääsetavad Europa portaali kaudu.
Parliament has given its first appreciation of the draft agreement in form of a resolution on 14 March 2007.
Saadikud leiavad, et EAFRDi puhul tuleb antud abisummad esitada liigendatuna vastavalt telgedele.
In this resolution Parliament underlined that the issues not resolved in this first-stage agreement should be dealt with in the second-stage agreement.
Samuti teevad nad ettepaneku täiendavate avaldatavate miinimumandmete kohta, et suurendada liikmesriikidevahelist võrreldavust.
These issues are cabotage, right of establishment and ownership.
Liikmesriigid võiksid parlamendiliikmete arvates andmekaitseõiguse nõuete raames teavet täiendavalt liigendada.
Furthermore, the Parliament proposes the concept of 'one stop security' and emphasised the need to reduce the negative environmental impact of aviation on climate change.
Näiteks võiksid nad avaldada teabe EAFRDst tehtavate maksete kohta ka tegevustepõhiselt.
Parliament wishes to be fully informed and consulted before and throughout the second-stage negotiations by the Commission.
Kuna läbipaistvus on eelarvekontrolli parandamise oluline faktor, tuleks saadikute arvates täpsustada andmete mitte-avaldamisel kasutatavaid reegleid.
Air services between the EU and US presently operate on the basis of bilateral agreements between individual Member States and the US.
Nad leiavad, et kui liikmesriikidepoolsel iga-aastasel avaldamisel esineb andmete puudumise tõttu tõsiseid vigu, tuleb makseid vähendada 2% võrra iga aasta eest, mille jooksul tõsiseid vigu ei kõrvaldata.
These bilateral agreements contain provisions that the European Court of Justice ruled in November 2002 to be incompatible with Community law.
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-005-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-004-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-007-ET DOC XML V0//ET
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20071008BRI11349 ITEM-006-EN DOC XML V0//EN
ELi-USA lennutranspordileping
MEPs call for 'master plan' for enhanced airport capacity
Parlament kiitis heaks ELi-USA lennutranspordilepingu ehk nn avatud taeva lepingu.
Within the EU, air traffic is growing at a rate of 5.2 % per annum.
Leping allkirjastati ELi-USA tippkohtumisel 30. aprillil 2007. aastal ning see hakkab kehtima 30. märtsil 2008.
Thus, by the year 2025, the demand for flights will be 2.5 times higher than that of 2003.
ELi-USA lennuturu avamine toob endaga kaasa kuni 80 tuhat uut töökohta ning kokkuleppest tulenev majanduslik kasu järgneva viie aasta jooksul on kuni 12 miljardit eurot.
More than 60 airports would then be unable to handle the typical busy hourly demand without generating delays or unaccommodated demand (3.7 million flights a year would then be unaccommodated).
Raporti poolt hääletas 513, vastu 15 ja erapooletuks jäi 35 saadikut.
MEPs stress that adequate airport capacity and efficient ground handling and use of capacity are vital to the European economy and must be ensured.
Lepingu eesmärgiks on luua ELi ja Ameerika Ühendriikide vaheline avatud lennunduspiirkond, mis looks lennutranspordi ühtse turu, kus investeeringute tegemist ning Euroopa ja Ameerika Ühendriikide lennuettevõtjate teenuste pakkumist ei takistaks piirangud, sealhulgas mõlema poole siseturul.
Although the planning of new infrastructure remains within the competence of the Member States, the House calls on the Commission to present before 2009 a master plan for enhanced airport capacity in Europe, in order to promote and better coordinate any national and cross-border initiative for building new airport capacities dedicated to international traffic and to make better use of existing capacities.
Saïd EL KHADRAOUI (PSE, BE) raportis kiidab parlament selle esimese etapi lepingu konsultatsioonimenetluse raames heaks.
Members took the view that only the cohabitation of various airport models according to national specificities (major hubs or regional airports through point-to point travels) will enable the EU to fulfil its need in this field.
Esimese etapi leping puudutab muuhulgas:
Promoting environmentally-friendly growth
lennufirmade õigust lennata EList ja USAst kolmandatesse riikidesse ja teha transpordilende (All Cargo) USAst kolmandatesse riikidesse, ilma nõudeta alustada sõitu ELis;
Despite progress as regards the environmental performance of aviation, MEPs argue that the growth in air traffic has resulted in a "sharp increase" in the total volume of greenhouse gas emissions produced by this sector (+100 % compared to 1990), and that airport congestion is contributing significantly to this.
ühenduse lennufirmade õigust lennata USA linnade ning erinevate ELi-väliste Euroopa linnade vahel (reisilennud);
A more efficient use of airport capacity is therefore vital.
ühenduse lennufirmade õigust lennata mistahes ELi punktist mistahes USA punkti, ilma ettekirjutusteta hinna või mahu osas;
Also, the growth of air transport will have to be accompanied by technical and regulatory schemes limiting the external costs of this mode, such as the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).