natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Samuti ei olnud mitmed saadikud rahul sellega, et komisjon ei arvestatud parlamendi soovidega omakäitluse ning lootsiteenuste osas.
The next step forward would be reaching a new Inter-institutional agreement.
Komisjoni ettepaneku tagasilükkamise poolt hääletas 532 ja vastu 120 saadikut, erapooletuid oli 25.
Extra effort would be required in the fields of citizenship, culture and youth.
Volinik Jacques BARROT ei võtnud komisjoni ettepanekut siiski tagasi, vaid lubas enne volinike kolleegiumiga nõu pidada.
The Commission, he said, would be putting forward a draft inter-institutional agreement on 1 February 2006.
Sellega läheb Georg JARZEMBOWSKI (EPP-ED, DE) raport transpordikomisjoni tagasi.
The priority of European citizens, he said, was growth and jobs.
Siinkohal on oluline parlamendi kodukorra artikkel 52.3, mis sätestab:
The spring summit, under the Austrian presidency, would be the first real test to see if Europe has delivered.
Kui Euroopa Komisjon oma ettepanekut tagasi ei võta, saadab parlament selle õigusloomega seotud resolutsiooni projekti hääletusele panemata tagasi vastutavale komisjonile.
The Member States, he recalled, had delivered their national action plans and they would be examined during the spring summit.
Parlamendi määratud aja jooksul, kuid mitte hiljem kui kahe kuu pärast, esitab vastutav komisjon sama ettepaneku kohta uue suulise või kirjaliku ettekande.
There was consensus on the revised Lisbon strategy, but now it was time to deliver " vision into action and words into deeds to achieve more and better jobs" .
Euroopa Komisjon esitas seejärel uue ettepaneku, mis aga erines esimest väga vähe, ning seda panid paljud saadikud pahaks.
The Commission would be coming forward with proposals on research and education, on a European Institute of Technology, and a road map for gender equality.
Raportööri kõnevoor
The Commission would be coming forward with a new communication on bio-fuels as well as working towards a real pan-European energy policy.
Georg JARZEMBOWSKI (EPP-ED, DE) ütles oma sõnavõtus, et ta ei mõista miks neli fraktsiooni tahavad ettepaneku tagasi saata, kui kõik ometi tahavad õiglast konkurentsi. "
The Commission President recalled that in the Spring, the Commission would publish its progress reports on Bulgaria and Romania and their readiness for accession on 1 January 2007.
Meil on vaja üle-euroopalisi reegleid turulepääsu osas, et ka sadamates oleks samasugused reeglid ."
He also welcomed that fact that the Austrian presidency had made progress on relations with the Western Balkans a priority.
Marianne THYSSEN (EPP-ED, BE) ütles oma sõnavõtus, et EK saatis peale esimese ettepaneku tagasilükkamist selle tagasi vaid marginaalselt muudetud kujul.
The leader of the EPP-ED group, Hans-Gert POETTERING (DE), told Mr Schüssel: " We expect a great deal from you.
See näitab, et EK ei võta parlamendi soove tõsiselt.
Europe needs confidence and to make progress.
Thysseni sõnul on tema fraktsioon kaldumas ettepaneku tagasilükkamise poole ka seekord, kuna omakäitlust ei saa kindlasti toetada ning kogupakett on vastuvõetamatu.
He spoke to the need to reinforce citizens' confidence in European institutions, but also confidence among heads of state and government: " The Council must work together, not each pushing their personal interest ."
Wilhelm Ernst PIECYK (PSE, DE) ütles, et tema fraktsioon lükkab ettepaneku tagasi, kuna " komisjoni ettepanek ei vasta Euroopa sadamate reaalsusele ".
Mr Poettering strongly rejected the statement from the Netherlands foreign minister that the constitution is dead.
Uus direktiiv tähendaks tema sõnul vaid bürokraatia suurenemist ning töökohtade ohtu seadmist.
He agreed on the need to promote SMEs, not through subsidies but by relief from the tax burden and bureaucracy.
Ta lisas, et osades sadamates on konkurents juba praegu väga tihe.
If we don't have single market Europe will be weak in dealing with globalisation ," he said.
Lõpetuseks palus ta komisjonil tulla välja tõeliselt uue ja korraliku ettepanekuga.
On the constitution he wanted a timetable to have a result all can accept.
Anne Elisabet JENSEN (ALDE, DK) ütles, et 50 aastat pärast ELi asutamist ei ole sadamateenuste jaoks ühtset õiguslikku raamistikku.
Finally on energy, he said prosperity was worth nothing if not based in democracy. "
Seda on tema sõnul väga vaja, ent mitte sellist, nagu EK on esitanud. "
We will not accept a G8 country making difference in price between a democracy like Ukraine and horrific dictatorship like Belarus ."
Mind üllatasid vägivaldsed demonstratsioonid EK ettepaneku vastu, millel ei ole eriti suurt võimalust vastuvõetuks saada ."
Martin SCHULZ (DE), leader of the Socialist group, said the presidency must have the necessary perspectives of growth and jobs.
Jenseni sõnul tuleb õiglase konkurentsi saavutamiseks arvestada ka sellega, et teenustepakkujad peavad suuri investeeringuid tegema, ehk uued pakkujad peavad võrreldes vanade turulolijatega palju rohkem kulutama.
He agreed that citizens do not want Javier Solana and Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner having " to pass the hat round to stabilise energy supplies, create stability in hotspots of world, work for peace in the Middle East.
Tema sõnul on liberaalide arvamus selles küsimuses lõhenenud, ent paljud hääletavad ettepaneku vastu.
We will have citizens on our side if there is an effective fight against terrorism with an effective European police force supporting Member States in tackling organised crime ."
Joost LAGENDIJK (Verts/ALE, NL) leidis, et on suur "saavutus" kulutada nii palju aega ettepanekule, mida nii karmilt kritiseeritakse.
He concluded: " The European Parliament is prepared to work towards the objectives you have set, but only with necessary resources and structures.
Ta avaldas kahetsust selle üle, et sadamatööliste demonstratsioon üle käte läks.
The Council, he said, wanted to cut funding for successful programmes like Erasmus and to cut the research spending that might lead to future successes like Airbus.
Samas on tema sõnul probleem selge: kvalifitseeritud tööjõud asendataks kvalifitseerimata odava tööjõuga.
He continued: " Growth and jobs mean embracing opportunities offered by EU, not shrinking under pressure from protectionists.
Erik MEIJER (GUE/NGL, NL) ütles oma sõnavõtus, et " direktiiv tekitaks rohkem probleeme kui ta neid lahendaks ".
Francis WURTZ (GUE/NGL, FR) commenced by noting that the presidency was "starting at top speed", but warned that the directive on port services, and the Presidency's financial plans would be called into question.
Direktiivi vastuvõtmisele järgneks tema arvates töökohtade kadumine ning madalapalgalise võõrtööjõu sissetoomine.
He called on the Commission to withdraw the directive on services, noting that "all Unions reject this; employers in Europe reject this out of hand".
Patrick LOUIS (IND/DEM, FR) avaldas arvamust, et sadamateenuste direktiivi on küll vaja, aga komisjoni ettepanek ei ole vastuvõetav.
Roger KNAPMAN (IND/DEM, UK) opened his speech with "so wonderful was Mr. Blair's presidency to Euro-Sceptics that we had hoped for an encore, but it was not to be".
Tema sõnul on muudatused, mis ettepanekusse on tehtud võrreldes kahe aasta tagusega, minimaalsed ning ei paranda ettepanekut mingil moel.
He warned that, after listening to the President's speech, the " Constitution is not dead but merely sleeping".
Roberts ZĪLE (UEN, LV) viitas sellele, et Balti riikide sadamad oleksid direktiivi vastuvõtmise puhul ebasoodsas olukorras võrreldes Vene sadamatega.
Christiana MUSCARDINI (IT), speaking for the UEN group, declared her full confidence in the Austrian Presidency's capacity to fulfil their promises on the EU and to deliver what the European people need.
Ta lisas, et komisjon on ettepanekuga välja tulnud ilma, et eelnevalt oleks tehtud mõju-uuringut.
However, she advised that Europe needs a coherent economic policy with competition and openness, and that it "has to find new strengths and the will to work together" .
Eesti delegatsiooni liige
She also urged the presidency to open up the debate on the constitution, to create a streamlined text and to have the "boldness to dare to commit to a more united Europe, with clearly defined tasks and clearly defined powers" .
Marianne MIKKO (PSE, EE) ütles oma sõnavõtus, et Eesti jaoks sadamateenuste direktiivi rakendamine suuri muudatusi kaasa ei tooks, kuna sadamateenuste turg liberaliseeriti peagi peale vabanemist nõukogude käsumajandusest.
Hans-Peter MARTIN (NI, AT) was concerned with the financial aspects of the President's agenda, and noted that "you can do something with money" but "more money doesn't mean you can achieve something better ".
Samas ütles ta, et: " Euroopa Komisjoni poolt ettepandud direktiiv sekkub laialdaselt detailidesse, nagu litsentseerimise protsess ning lepingute kestvus, jättes aga vastutuse olulistes valdkondades liikmesriikide kanda.
He accused the Austrians of favouritism when it came to spending, alleging that 427 Austrian farmers get more than €72,000 in direct payments, and accordingly declared a need for greater transparency: "who's going to get what from the pot?".
Ühtsed ning selged kvaliteedi, keskkonna ja ohutuse standardid oleksid siseturu konkurentsi parandamiseks vajalikumad kui detailsed ettekirjutused.
In creating this transparency he also encouraged taking a look at the media landscape as well, and advised the Austrians to put an end to their silence on domestic policy.
Ühtlasi jagan ma vana Euroopa sadamatööliste kartusi.
He welcomed Chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel's comments on the European Court of Justice stating that the Court had extended its competences into areas where there was no European law.
Näib, et efektiivsuse tõusu tahab komisjon saavutada peamiselt kvalifitseeritud töötegijate arvelt. "
Mr Kirkhope said that it would be better if the Constitution was not " resurrected ".
Mikko lisas, et Eesti sadamad " konkureerivad kvaliteedi, mitte odava tööjõuga " ning lubas hääletada ettepaneku vastu.
Europe's citizens were concerned with jobs, growth, the environment, fighting terrorism and crime in order to achieve a better quality of life.
Georg JARZEMBOWSKI (EPP-ED, DE)
Andrew DUFF (ALDE, UK) gave an overview of various politicians' positions on the Constitution. "
Komisjoni neljas aruanne liidu kodakondsuse kohta
He also defended his government's record on rights for minority populations in Austria.
Täiskogu lükkas teisipäeval, 17. jaanuaril tagasi Giusto CATANIA (GUE/NGL, IT) raporti ELi kodakondsuse kohta.
On the labour market, he pointed out that the transitional periods had been agreed by all sides in drawing up the accession treaties, and that should be respected.
Raporti poolt oli 276 ja vastu 347 saadikut, erapooletuid oli 22.
Regarding the Court of Justice, he said " We need balance on respect for and implementation of community law and subsidiarity.
Raport käsitles muuhulgas kolmandate riikide kodanikele valimisõiguse andmist kohalikel ja riiklikel valimistel ning Euroopa Parlamendi valimistel.
We have national legislation and case law as well as European.
Tekstis oli mitmeid vastuolulisi lõike.
The proportionality principle is also important ."
Raport, mis oleks pidanud olema parlamendi vastuseks Euroopa Komisjoni neljandale aruandele liidu kodakondsuse kohta, jäi seega vastu võtmata.
President Barroso , in his response to the debate, said that the two key points of the Austrian Presidency would be the Spring European Council and the June European Council.
Giusto CATANIA (GUE/NGL, IT)
MEPs call for a Constitution by 2009
Parlament lükkas kolmapäeval, 18. jaanuaril tagasi Ülemkogul detsembris finantsperspektiivi osas saavutatud kokkuleppe ning kutsub nõukogu üles alustama läbirääkimisi nii vahendite mahu kui ka kulutuste iseloomu osas.
By approving, by 385 in favour, 125 against and 51 abstentions, the report by Andrew DUFF (ALDE, UK) and Johannes VOGGENHUBER (Greens/EFA, AT), MEPs want to ensure that the new debate delivers tangible results.
Parlament ei pea nõukogu ettepanekut piisavaks, sest selles nähakse kulukohustuste assigneeringutena ette 862,363 miljardit eurot (1,045% ELi RKTst).
Comprehensive institutional reform is seen as necessary to ensure that an enlarged EU functions properly, since the Nice Treaty is inappropriate for the continuation of the integration process.
Parlamendi 5. juunil 2005 vastu võetud seisukoht on, et kulukohustuste assigneeringutena tuleb ette näha 974,837 miljardit eurot (1,18% ELi RKTst).
MEPs also criticise the suggestion that a core group of Member States could start implementing reforms, leaving the other countries behind.
Tagasilükkamise poolt oli 541 ja vastu 56 saadikut, erapooletuid oli 76.
The EP also confirmed its endorsement of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and asked the Council to declare its commitment for a settlement on the future of Europe.
Parlament lükkab Euroopa Ülemkogu ühise seisukoha praegusel kujul tagasi, " sest see ei taga ELile eelarvet, mis suurendab tulevikus heaolu, konkurentsivõimet, solidaarsust, ühtekuuluvust ja julgeolekut nõukogu enda kokku lepitud poliitika kohaselt ".
Different outcomes of the debate are envisaged in the report, from abandoning the constitutional project to continuing with ratification, from seeking to clarify the present text to complete re-drafting.
Parlament leiab samuti, et kokkulepe " ei lase ei täita uute liikmesriikide ees võetud kohustusi ega sisalda piisavat ja üksikasjalikku paindlikkusmehhanismi, vankumatut tahet alustada läbivaatamist Euroopa Parlamendi osalusel ega lisameetmeid näiteks selleks, et tagada parem täitmine ja vahendite kulutamise kontroll liikmesriikides ".
Although Members agree that it is important not to pre-empt the outcome of such a debate, there were differences of views among the groups that supported the report.
Siiski tervitati seda, et " Euroopa Ülemkogu saavutas lõpuks liikmesriikide vahel ühise seisukoha, mis võimaldab alustada järgmise finantsperspektiivi üle läbirääkimisi Euroopa Parlamendiga ".
Richard CORBETT (PES, UK), and Alexander STUBB (EPP-ED, FI), shadow rapporteurs for their groups, considered that a positive outcome of the debate would be to keep the current text, although only if accompanied by significant measures.
Parlament tuletas ka meelde, et ta peab olema kaasatud ELi eelarve ülevaatamisse ning et ta "peab suuremat paindlikkust väga tähtsaks".
Eventually, these measures could be declarations or extra protocols to be added to the constitutional Treaty.
Saadikud lisavad, et nad on valmis alustama läbirääkimisi nõukoguga eeldusel, et eesistujariik Austria saab tõelised läbirääkimisvolitused.
On the contrary, the two co-rapporteurs support the idea of keeping only the constitutional core of the current text and use it as a basis to substantially improve the Treaty.
Läbirääkimised jätkuvad 23. jaanuaril trialoogi raames.
Finally, Members opted for the first alternative.
Kolmapäeval, 18. jaanuaril arutasid Borrell, Barroso ja Schüssel läbirääkimiste ajakava ning ülesehitust.
Format for the new public debate Members agree that, to increase public participation, the proposed European debate should be guided by common topics and have clear political goals.
Komisjon peaks institutsioonidevahelise kokkuleppe ettepaneku esitama 1. veebruaril, seda kasutatakse edasiste läbirääkimiste alusena.
As part of the process, MEPs are calling for a number of conferences and meetings to be held as a way of advancing the debate on the future of the EU.
Osapooled loodavad läbirääkimistega lõpule jõuda kevadiseks Ülemkoguks.
These would be known as Parliamentary Forums and Citizens' Forums.
Seda tänu seadusandlusele, mille Euroopa Parlament kolmapäeval, 18. jaanuaril suure häälteenamusega (584 poolt, 11 vastu, 56 erapooletut) heaks kiitis.
Under the proposed schedule, the Parliamentary Forums, a number of conferences between national parliaments and the EP, would be held in Spring this year.
Vastav teave pannakse üles ka supluskohtadesse.
The first forum is scheduled for 9 May 2006.
Läbirääkimised nõukoguga kestsid kolm aastat ning lõppesid standardite karmistamisega, parandamaks suplusvee kvaliteeti terves ELis.
At the same time, to ensure public participation, the EP asks to Member States to hold a large number of Citizens Forums, i.e. public meetings and media debates at national and local level.
Euroopa Liit on juba aastaid püüdnud välja vahetada olemasolevat suplusvee direktiivi, mis pärineb aastast 1976.
The two co-rapporteurs stressed that all these debates should be structured around specific topics to deliver clear results.
Parlament ja nõukogu püüdsid seejuures leida tasakaalu tervishoiustandardite ning haldus- ja finantskoormuse vahel.
They should involve political parties, employers' and employees' representatives, civil society, the academic community and the media.
Direktiiv puudutab nii siseveekogusid kui ka rannikuvett.
According to the approved report, the public is concerned more about the context, i.e. the EU's political role and policies, than the constitutional text itself.
Raportöör Jules MAATEN (ALDE/ADLE, NL) on tulemusega rahul, kuna uus direktiiv parandab olemasolevat põhiliselt kolmel moel:
MEPs believe the main issues on which the debate should focus are: the integration process, the EU's global role, the European social and economic model, security and justice and the financing of the Union.
suplejate tervishoiurisk langeb oluliselt.
Therefore the EP asks for the prolongation of the period of reflection.
Hetkel on suplejal 12% oht haigestuda, see oht langeb 7,5%ni, kusjuures riski vähendamisega seotud kulud on mõistlikud;
In fact, after taking into account the results of the debate, a clear decision on the way forward should be taken by second half of 2007.
oluliselt paraneb avalikkuse teavitamine.
The European Parliament will monitor the whole process and summarise the proposals put forward during the debates.
Teave (mida tuleb pidevalt uuendada) on tulevikus saadaval Internetis ning supluskohtades.
Structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
on vähem bürokraatlik kui eelmine.
Many MEPs demanded in its place legislation on transparency and fair competition between ports.
Tulevikus keskendutakse uuringutes kahele tervishoiu seisukohast kõige olulisemale näitajale.
The European Parliament rejected a conciliation agreement between the Council and Parliament on port services in November 2003.
Varem oli näitajaid 19, millest osad olid kaotanud oma tähtsuse.
At the end of Commission's last term in office, the Commission presented fresh proposals, to the dismay of many MEPs.
"Piisava kvaliteediga" suplusvesi on uus kategooria, mille tõi sisse nõukogu ning mis on madalam kategooria, kui "väga hea kvaliteediga" või "hea kvaliteediga" suplusvesi.
Commissioner Barrot stated that he would consult the college of Commissioners before deciding whether or not to withdraw the proposal.
Parlament nõustus uue kategooriaga peale seda, kui karmistati uuelt kategoorialt nõutavaid näitajaid.
Debate preceding the vote Transport Commissioner Jacques BARROT said the package met the needs first identified by the Commission when it came up with its first proposal in 2001.
"Piisava kvaliteediga" suplusvee soole enterokoki näitaja ei tohi vastavalt kokkuleppele siseveekogudes olla üle 330 (pmü/100 ml) ning rannikuvetes üle 185.
The goals of the present proposal, presented by former Commissioner Loyola de Palacio, were to establish freedom to provide port services, reflecting the Treaties, the Lisbon strategy and the aim of reducing road congestion.
Escherichia coli bakteri näitajaid ei muudetud.
It included respect for environmental rules and safety at sea, along with employment and social security concerns.
Komisjon peab parlamendile 2008. aastal esitama raporti suplusvee kvaliteedi kohta ning raport peab sisaldama ka analüüsi viiruste osas.
The package called for guidelines on port services and financial transparency. "
Raporti alusel peab komisjon direktiivi 2020. aastaks läbi vaatama ning on võimalik, et "piisava kvaliteediga" suplusvee kategooriast tuleb siis loobuda.
I want to underline the importance of efficient ports as an essential link in the transport chain and development of sea motorways.
Direktiivi tuleb hakata rakendama kaks aastat pärast selle jõustumist.
Ninety per cent of our external trade goes through sea ports.
Austria eesistumise tegevuskava
There were no major amendments to transparency provisions. "
Kolmapäeva, 18. jaanuari hommikul arutati 1. jaanuaril alanud Austria eesistumise tegevuskava.
I find it incomprehensible why four groups want to refer this back to the committee ...
Eesistujariiki esindas kantsler Wolfgang SCHÜSSEL .
European rules are needed.
Eesistujariigi kõnevoor
Mr Jarzembowski made five specific points.
Eesistujariigi esindajana sai sõna kantsler Wolfgang SCHÜSSEL , kes ütles, et: " Euroopa ei ole ühevärviline, vaid kirju, nagu ka Austria eesistumise logo ."
Firstly, if there was to be opening of market access for new service providers, this means opening up leases and introducing calls for tender.
Schüsseli sõnul oli 2005. aasta liidu jaoks väga raske ning ta esitas küsimuse - miks nii paljud kodanikud on Euroopa suhtes skeptilised?
Secondly, the transitional rules meant leases could continue for up to 45 years, so there was no risk to jobs or present IT contracts.
Austria püüdleb tema sõnul selle poole, et eesistumise lõpuks oleks kodanike usaldus ELi suhtes, liikmesriikide vastastikune usaldus ning institutsioonidevaheline usaldus jälle kasvuteel.
Thirdly, self handling should be removed from the directive, but there was no risk of social dumping as the Member States' social rules and collective bargaining arrangements would not be affected.
Schüssel kinnitas, et energia tarnekindlus on oluline teema, mida arutatakse ka kevadisel Ülemkogul.
Fourthly, market access for new companies would mean the most efficient, best priced bid winning.
Ta rõhutas, et tuleb mitmekesistada energiaallikaid ning vähendada sõltuvust ühest tarnijast.
Fifthly, Europe's import and export businesses require efficient and cost effective ports, in a way that respects the interests of existing providers and supports employment in the sector.
Samuti on kevadisel Ülemkogul keskseks teemaks majanduskasv ja tööhõive.
" If it is to be rejected, there will be no European rules, which would create planning and legal uncertainty.
Riikide vastavad kavad on juba esitatud ning komisjon hindab neid hetkel.
I want to say to my colleagues, try not to worry too much about yesterday's strikes.
Austria soovib nendest kavadest parimad ideed välja noppida ning siis ühise programmiga välja tulla.
We should not allow the actions of some to influence us ," he said.
Ta lisas, et igal juhul on vaja pöörata rohkem tähelepanu VKEdele ning nende halduskoormust vähendada.
Speaking for the Employment Committee, Stephen HUGHES (PES, UK) said that yesterday's violence was unacceptable, but that MEPs should understand the frustration of dockers.
Kantsler jätkas, öeldes et ka Euroopa sotsiaalpartneritele on vaja tähelepanu pöörata, kuna Austria kogemus on, et demokraatia ja turumajanduse õnnestumiseks on vaja tugevaid sotsiaalpartnereid.
It was ill informed and an insult to the European Parliament to bring back an almost unchanged proposal only 18 months after MEPs rejected it. "
Oluline on ka edasiminek finantsperspektiivi osas.
Opening pilot services to tender at the lowest price is ludicrous.
Schüsseli arvates on vaja rohkem investeerida teadus- ja arendustegevusse.
In my area of Teesside, with its major chemical industries, it would expose the entire population to danger.
Ent ta ütles: " Euroopa vajab suuremat omafinantseerimist.
The Commission should revise its proposal completely before bringing it forward ."
Pingutatud riiklikest eelarvetest ei saa veel rohkem välja pigistada ."
The Commission's proposal ignores Parliament's voice.
Laienemine sõltub tema sõnul ka ELi vastuvõtuvõimest ning ei ole geograafiline, vaid poliitiline otsus.
The rapporteur is worthy of our respect, but he no longer has the opportunity to find a majority for a feasible and useful solution.
Fraktsioonide kõnevoor
Such acts of violence were unacceptable.