natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We found that most actions had produced the expected outputs and that Member States generally checked the reasonableness of costs, but had made little use of simplified cost options. 
Leidsime, et enamik tegevusi oli oodatud tulemusi andnud ja et liikmesriigid kontrollisid ldiselt kulude mistlikkust, kuid lihtsustatud kuluvimalusi kasutati vhe.
We focused on their use of result indicators for 113 rural development payments and 95 direct payments. 
Keskendusime tulemusnitajate kasutamisele 113 maaelu arengu makse ja 95 otsetoetuse makse puhul.
In line with the findings of our previous audits on performance measurement in agricultural and rural development spending, we identified several weaknesses in the way in which the Commission and Member States had applied the CMEF result indicators to measure and report on the performance of spending. 
Sarnaselt meie varasemate auditite leidudele pllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu kulutuste tulemuslikkuse mtmise kohta, leidsime mitmeid puudusi viisis, kuidas komisjon ja liikmesriigid rakendasid CMEFi tulemusnitajaid kulutuste tulemuslikkuse mtmiseks ja neist aru andmiseks.
In our opinion No 7/2018 on the proposal, while we welcomed the shift to a performance-based model, we found that these indicators were not yet fully developed and made specific comments on the proposed indicators. 
Oma arvamuses nr 7/2018 mainitud ettepaneku kohta pooldasime leminekut tulemusphisele mudelile, kuid leidsime, et knealused nitajad ei ole veel tielikult vlja ttatud ja esitasime kavandatud nitajate kohta konkreetseid thelepanekuid.
What we recommend In our 2017 annual report, we made three recommendations to the Commission with a target implementation date end of 2019. 
Meie soovitused Oma 2017. aasta aastaaruandes esitasime komisjonile kolm soovitust, mille titmise thtaeg oli 2019. aasta lpp.
They were related to the Member StatesŐ actions to address the causes of errors and the quality of the work of certification bodies. 
Need puudutasid liikmesriikide meetmeid vigade phjuste krvaldamiseks ja sertifitseerimisasutuste t kvaliteeti.
These recommendations are also relevant to this yearŐs findings and conclusions, and we will follow them up in due course. 
Soovitused kehtivad ka selle aasta leidude ja jrelduste kohta ja me teeme nende titmise le igeaegselt jrelevalvet.
This year, we also recommend that the Commission, for the post-2020 period, take into account the weaknesses we identified in the current framework, in order to ensure that result indicators properly measure the effects of actions and that they have a clear link to the related interventions and policy objectives. 
Sel aastal soovitame komisjonil ka 2020. aastale jrgneva perioodi tarbeks arvesse vtta puudusi, mis me praeguses raamistikus tuvastasime, tagamaks, et tulemusnitajad mdavad nuetekohaselt meetmete mju ning on selgelt seotud asjaomaste sekkumiste ja poliitikaeesmrkidega.
Want to know more? Full information on our audit of EU expenditure on ÔNatural resourcesŐ can be found in Chapter 7 of our 2018 annual report. 
Tielik teave meie auditi kohta, mis ksitleb ELi kulutusi loodusvarade valdkonnas, on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 7. peatkis.
33 Security and citizenship Total: Ű3.1 billion What we audited This spending area groups various policies whose common objective is to strengthen the concept of European citizenship by creating an area of freedom, justice and security without internal borders. 
33 Julgeolek ja kodakondsus Kokku: 3,1 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Knealune kuluvaldkond koondab erinevaid poliitikavaldkondi, mille hine eesmrk on tugevdada Euroopa kodakondsuse kontseptsiooni, luues vabadusel, turvalisusel ja igusel rajanev sisepiirideta ala.
ÔMigration and securityŐ is largely implemented through shared management between the Member States and the CommissionŐs Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs (DG Migration and Home Affairs). 
Rnde ja julgeoleku valdkonna eelarve titmine toimub suuremas osas liikmesriikide ja komisjoni rnde ja siseasjade peadirektoraadi koosts.
The most important funds under this heading are: o the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) which aims to contribute to the effective management of migration flows and bring about a common EU approach to asylum and immigration; o the Internal Security Fund (ISF), which aims to achieve a high level of security in the EU. 
Selle rubriigi thtsaimad fondid on o Varjupaiga-, Rnde-ja Integratsioonifond (AMIF), mille eesmrk on edendada rndevoogude thusat haldamist ning varjupaiga-ja sisserndeksimuste ELi hise lhenemisviisi saavutamist; o Sisejulgeolekufond (ISF), mille eesmrk on saavutada ELis julgeoleku krge tase.
These funds began in 2014, when they replaced the SOLID programme (ÔSolidarity and Management of Migration FlowsŐ), and will run until 2020. 
Fondid alustasid tegevust 2014. aastal, mil nad vahetasid vlja SOLID programmi (Solidaarsus ja rndevoogude juhtimine), ning nad tegutsevad kuni 2020. aastani.
In 2018, they account for around half (45 %) of EU spending in this area. 
2018. aastal moodustasid need umbes poole (45 %) ELi kulutustest selles valdkonnas.
Spending by 13 decentralised agencies that are active in the implementation of key EU priorities in the areas of migration and security, judicial cooperation and health accounts for another 27 %. 
13 detsentraliseeritud asutuse rahastamine, kes rakendavad ELi peamisi prioriteete rnde ja julgeoleku, igusalase koost ja tervishoiu valdkonnas, moodustab veel 27 %.
We report separately on EU agencies in our specific annual reports and an annual summary ÔAudit of EU agencies in briefŐ. 
ELi asutuste auditi kohta anname eraldi aru iga-aastastes eriaruannetes ja iga-aastases kokkuvtvas dokumendis ăELi asutuste auditi lhikokkuvteŇ.
For 2018, the expenditure subject to audit in this area was Ű3.0 billion. 
2018. aastal moodustasid selle valdkonna auditeeritud kulud 3,0 miljardit eurot.
What we found In 2018, we reviewed selected systems covering the main policies of this spending area and examined a small number of transactions. 
Auditi tulemused 2018. aastal vaatasime valikuliselt lbi ssteemid, mis hlmavad knealuse kuluvaldkonna peamisi poliitikavaldkondi, ja kontrollisime vikest arvu tehinguid.
We found DG Migration and Home AffairsŐ management of calls for proposals and grant applications to be effective. 
Leidsime, et projektikonkursside ja toetusetaotluste haldamine rnde ja siseasjade peadirektoraadi poolt oli thus.
At the same time, our examination revealed deficiencies in the application of public procurement rules, and some system weaknesses in the management of AMIF and the ISF and in the controls of the Food and Feed programme by the Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. 34 
Samas leidsime puudusi riigihanke-eeskirjade kohaldamisel, mningaid ssteemi puudusi AMIFi ja ISFi haldamisel ning toidu-ja sdaprogrammi kontrollimisel tervise ja toiduohutuse peadirektoraadi poolt. 34
What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: o ensure that, when making administrative checks of payment claims, it systematically uses the documentation it has required from grant beneficiaries to properly examine the legality and regularity of the procurement procedures these beneficiaries have organised; and o instruct the Member State authorities responsible for national AMIF and ISF programmes to adequately check the legality and regularity of the procurement procedures organised by beneficiaries of the funds when making administrative checks of their payment claims. 
Meie soovitused Esitame komisjonile jrgmised soovitused: o tagada, et ta kasutaks maksetaotluste halduskontrolli tegemisel sstemaatiliselt kiki dokumente, mida ta on oma toetusesaajatelt nudnud, et tielikult kontrollida nende toetusesaajate korraldatud hankemenetluste seaduslikkust ja korrektsust; o anda riiklike AMIFi ja ISFi programmide eest vastutavatele liikmesriikide ametiasutustele korraldus kontrollida nuetekohaselt fondi toetusesaajate korraldatud hankemenetluste seaduslikkust ja korrektsust, kui nad teevad nende maksetaotluste halduskontrolli. Soovite tiendavat teavet?
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure for ÔSecurity and citizenshipŐ can be found in Chapter 8 of our 2018 annual report. 35 
Tielik teave meie auditi kohta, mis ksitleb ELi kulutusi valdkonnas ăJulgeolek ja kodakondsusŇ, on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 8. peatkis. 35
Global Europe Total: Ű9.5 billion What we audited This spending area covers expenditure in the fields of foreign policy, the promotion of EU values, support for EU candidate and potential candidate countries, and development assistance and humanitarian aid for developing and neighbouring countries (with the exception of the European Development Funds Đ see pages 40 to 42). 
Globaalne Euroopa Kokku: 9,5 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Knealune rubriik hlmab kulutusi vlispoliitika valdkondades, ELi vrtuste propageerimist, toetust ELi kandidaatriikidele ja potentsiaalsetele kandidaatriikidele ning arenguabi ja humanitaarabi arengu-ja naaberriikidele (vlja arvatud Euroopa Arengufondid Đ vt lk 40Đ42).
Spending is implemented either directly by a number of Directorates-General at the Commission (either from their headquarters in Brussels or through EU delegations in more than 150 recipient countries), or indirectly by beneficiary countries and international organisations, using a broad range of cooperation instruments and delivery methods. 
Kulutusi haldavad mitu komisjoni peadirektoraati kas otse, tehes seda Brsselis asuvast peakorterist vi enam kui 150 abisaajariigis paiknevatest ELi delegatsioonidest, vi kaudselt abisaajariikide ja rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonide kaudu.
For 2018, the expenditure subject to audit in this area was Ű8.0 billion. 
2018. aastal moodustasid selle valdkonna auditeeritud kulud 8,0 miljardit eurot.
What we found In 2018, we found some cases of ineligible expenditure and non-compliance with the legal and financial rules for awarding contracts, but we also came across examples of effective external controls. The uncooperativeness shown by international organisations in not forwarding essential supporting documents seriously delayed our audit work. 
Auditi tulemused 2018. aastal leidsime mned rahastamisklbmatute kulude ning lepingute slmimise igus-ja finantsnormide rikkumise juhtumeid, kuid leidsime ka niteid thusast vliskontrollist. Koostst keeldumine rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonide poolt oluliste tendavate dokumentide edastamisel tekitas meie ts tsiseid viivitusi.
We consider that this constitutes an infringement of our audit rights under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. 
Oleme seisukohal, et see kujutab endast meie ELi toimimise lepingust tulenevate auditeerimisiguste rikkumist.
Annual activity reports and other governance arrangements In 2018, the Directorate-General for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations commissioned its fourth annual residual error rate (RER) study from an external contractor. 
Aasta tegevusaruanded ja muu juhtimiskord 2018. aastal tellis Euroopa naabruspoliitika ja laienemislbirkimiste peadirektoraat vliselt tvtjalt neljanda allesjnud veamra kokkuleppelise toimingu.
The purpose of the RER study is to measure Ôerrors that have evaded all prevention, detection and correction controlsŐ. 
Allesjnud veamra kokkuleppelise toimingu eesmrk on mta vigu, mida ei ole hegi kontrolli abil ennetatud, avastatud ega parandatud.
However, in 2018, for around 24 % of the sampled transactions, the RER relied fully on the results of previous controls, without any additional checks. 
2018. aastal tugineti aga ligikaudu 24 % puhul valimis sisaldunud tehingutest tielikult varasemate kontrollide tulemustele, ilma hegi tiendava kontrollita.
This share had almost doubled since 2017. 
Vrreldes 2017. aastaga on see osakaal peaaegu kahekordistunud.
The Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations has made additional efforts to exclude recoveries on pre-financing, cancelled recovery orders and earned interest from the calculation of the estimated amount at risk. 
Euroopa elanikkonnakaitse ja humanitaarabioperatsioonide peadirektoraat on teinud tiendavaid jupingutusi, et jtta hinnangulise veamra arvutusest vlja eelmaksete tagasimaksenuded, thistatud tagasimaksenuded ja teenitud intressid.
We found nevertheless that the reliability of the 2018 figure presented in the DG's AAR was impaired by undetected errors that led to an overstatement of the DGŐs corrective capacity. 36 
Sellest hoolimata leidsime, et peadirektoraadi 2018. aasta tegevusaruandes esitatud nitaja usaldusvrsust vhendavad avastamata vead, mis viisid peadirektoraadi korrektsioonivime lehindamiseni. 36
Performance assessment In addition to checking regularity, we assessed performance aspects for 15 completed projects. 
Tulemuslikkuse hindamine Lisaks korrektsuse kontrollimisele hindasime ka 15 lpule viidud projekti tulemuslikkuse aspekte.
All but one of the projects we examined had clear and relevant performance indicators. 
Kigil kontrollitud projektidel peale he olid selged ja asjakohased tulemusnitajad.
Logical frameworks were well structured, and output objectives were realistic and achievable. 
Loogilised raamistikud olid hsti struktureeritud ning vljundid realistlikud ja saavutatavad.
What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: o take all the necessary steps to reinforce the obligation on international organisations to provide us with any document or information we need for our work; o take steps to adapt DG European Neighbourhood Policy and EnlargementŐs methodology to limit full-reliance decisions, and that it monitors its implementation closely; o amend the way corrective capacity is to be calculated in 2019 by excluding recoveries of unspent pre-financing. Want to know more? 
Meie soovitused Esitame komisjonile jrgmised soovitused: o vtta kik vajalikud meetmed, tagamaks, et rahvusvahelised organisatsioonid tidavad oma kohustust edastada meile mis tahes dokument vi teave, mis on vajalik meie lesannete titmiseks; o kohandada Euroopa naabruspoliitika ja laienemislbirkimiste peadirektoraadi metoodikat nii, et teiste tle tuginevate otsuste osakaal vheneks, ning tagada phjalik kontroll metoodika rakendamise le; o muuta 2019. aasta korrektsioonivime arvutamist, jttes sellest vlja kasutamata eelmaksete tagasimaksenuded.
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure for ÔGlobal EuropeŐ can be found in Chapter 9 of our 2018 annual report. 37 
Tielik teave meie auditi kohta, mis ksitleb ELi kulutusi rubriigis ăGlobaalne EuroopaŇ, on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 9. peatkis. 37
Administration Total: Ű9.9 billion What we audited Our audit covered the administrative expenditure of the EU institutions and certain other bodies: the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council of the European Union, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman, the European Data Protection Supervisor, and the European External Action Service. 
Haldus Kokku: 9,9 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Meie audit hlmas ELi institutsioonide ja mningate muude organite (Euroopa Parlament, Euroopa lemkogu ja Euroopa Liidu Nukogu, Euroopa Komisjon, Euroopa Kohus, Euroopa Kontrollikoda, Euroopa Majandus-ja Sotsiaalkomitee, Regioonide Komitee, Euroopa Ombudsman, Euroopa Andmekaitseinspektor ja Euroopa vlisteenistus) halduskulusid.
In 2018, the institutions and bodies had a total of 9.9 billion euros in administrative expenditure. 
2018. aastal moodustasid institutsioonide ja asutuste halduskulud kokku 9,9 miljardit eurot.
This amount comprised spending on human resources (about 60 % of the total), buildings, equipment, energy, communications and IT. 
Knealune summa sisaldas peamiselt personalikulusid, mis moodustavad kogusummast ca 60 %, ning hoonete, seadmete, energia, side ja infotehnoloogiaga seotud kulusid.
We publish the results of our audits of the EU agencies, other decentralised bodies and the European Schools separately, in specific annual reports. 
Me avaldame Euroopa Liidu asutusi, teisi detsentraliseeritud organeid ja Euroopa koole ksitlevate auditite tulemused eraldi iga-aastastes eriaruannetes.
We also publish a consolidated summary of these audits. 
Me avaldame ka nende auditite koondkokkuvtte.
An external auditor audits our own financial statements. 
Meie enda finantsaruandeid auditeerib vlisaudiitor.
The audit opinion and report are published in the Official Journal of the European Union and on our website. 
Auditiarvamus ja -aruanne avaldatakse Euroopa Liidu Teatajas ja meie veebisaidil.
For 2018, the expenditure subject to audit in this area was Ű9.9 billion. 
2018. aastal moodustasid selle valdkonna auditeeritud kulud 9,9 miljardit eurot.
What we found In 2018, we examined 45 transactions in this area of the budget. 
Auditi tulemused 2018. aastal kontrollisime selles eelarvevaldkonnas 45 tehingut.
As in previous years, we estimated that the level of error is below the materiality threshold. 
Veamr jb meie hinnangul alla olulisuse piirmra, nagu ka varasematel aastatel.
However, this year we detected a greater number of internal control weaknesses at the Commission in its management of family allowances payable to staff. 
Sel aastal tuvastasime aga suuremal arvul puudusi komisjoni sisekontrollimehhanismides, mis puudutab ttajatele makstavate peretoetuste haldamist.
Procurement procedures to improve the security of people and premises In response to the spate of terrorist attacks in recent years, the EU institutions have adopted measures to strengthen the protection of their staff and premises as a matter of urgency. 
Riigihankemenetlused, mille eesmrk on parandada inimeste ja hoonete turvalisust Viimastel aastatel toimunud terrorirnnakute laine tttu on ELi institutsioonid vtnud meetmeid, et kiiresti parandada oma ttajate ja hoonete turvalisust.
We examined 13 procurement procedures relating to these measures and organised by the institutions between 2015 and 2018. 
Vaatasime lbi 13 nimetatud meetmetega seotud hankemenetlust, mille institutsioonid on korraldanud aastail 2015Đ2018.
We focused in particular on the definition of needs, the nature of the procurement procedure used, the implementation of the procedure and the selection of contractors. 
Keskendusime eelkige vajaduste kindlakstegemisele, kasutatud hankemenetluse laadile, menetluse rakendamisele ja tvtjate valikule.
We found weaknesses, usually tied to the urgency of concluding contracts, in procedures organised by the Parliament and by the Commission. 
Leidsime parlamendis ja komisjonis korraldatud menetlustes puudusi, mis ldjuhul tulenesid kiirustamisest lepingute slmimisel.
Ű9.9 billion No - Free from material error in 2018 and 2017 
9,9 miljardit eurot Tulud ei sisaldanud olulisel mral vigu (2018 ja 2017)
What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: o improve its systems for managing statutory family allowances. It should reassess staff membersŐ personal situation more frequently and strengthen its checks on the declaration of allowances received from other sources. 
Meie soovitused Esitame komisjonile jrgmised soovitused: o parandada kohustuslike peretoetuste haldamise ssteeme, kontrollida ttajate isiklikku olukorda senisest sagedamini ja thustada teistest allikatest saadud toetuste deklareerimise kontrollimist.
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure for ÔAdministrationŐ can be found in Chapter 10 of our 2018 annual report. 
Tielik teave meie auditi kohta, mis ksitleb ELi kulutusi rubriigis ăHaldusŇ, on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 10. peatkis.
European Development Funds Total: Ű4.1 billion What we audited The European Development Funds (EDFs) are the main instrument by which the EU provides development cooperation aid. 
Euroopa Arengufondid Kokku: 4,1 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Euroopa Arengufondid (EAFid) on ELi peamine arengukoost abi andmise vahend.
EDF spending and cooperation instruments aim to overcome poverty and to promote sustainable development and the integration of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries and overseas countries and territories (OCTs) in the world economy. 
EAFide kulutused ja koostvahendid on suunatud vaesuse likvideerimisele; lisaks edendatakse sstvat arengut ning Aafrika, Kariibi mere ja Vaikse ookeani piirkonna (AKV) riikide ning lemeremaade ja -territooriumide (MT) integreerimist maailmamajandusse.
We also conclude that the revenue of the EDFs was free from material error. 
Samuti jreldame, et EAFide tulud ei olnud olulisel mral vigadest mjutatud.
In 2018, we examined a representative sample of 125 transactions drawn from the full range of payments from the EDFs. 
2018. aastal kontrollisime 125 tehingust koosnevat esinduslikku valimit, mis esindab EAFide kiki makseid.
Since part of this expenditure was covered by the residual error rate (RER) study made by Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG International Cooperation and Development), we included 14 further transactions in our sample, to which we applied, after adjustment, the results of this study. 
Kuna osa knealustest kuludest oli hlmatud rahvusvahelise koost ja arengu peadirektoraadi tehtud allesjnud veamra kokkuleppelise toiminguga, lisasime oma valimisse veel 14 tehingut, mille suhtes kohaldasime prast kohandusi knealuse toimingu tulemusi.
On the basis of the 39 errors we have quantified, and the adjusted results of the 2018 RER study, we estimate the level of error to be 5.2 %. 
Kvantifitseeritud 39 vea alusel ja 2018. aasta allesjnud veamra kokkuleppelise toimingu phjal on meie hinnanguline veamr 5,2 %.
We found that most errors related to non-compliance with procurement rules, expenditure that either had not been incurred or was ineligible, overheads claimed as direct costs, and the absence of supporting documents. 
Leidsime, et enamik vigu oli seotud hankemenetluste mittejrgimisega, kandmata vi rahastamisklbmatute kuludega, otsekuludena deklareeritud ldkuludega ja tendavate dokumentide puudumisega.
For some transactions implemented by international organisations, they did not forward essential supporting documents within a reasonable time frame. 
Rahvusvahelised organisatsioonid ei edastanud mne tehingu kohta meile mistliku aja jooksul olulisi tendavaid dokumente.
This had a negative impact on the planning and execution of our audit work and goes against the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, which establishes the ECAŐs right to be sent the information it requests. 
See mjutas negatiivselt meie auditit kavandamist ja rakendamist ning on vastuolus Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepinguga, milles stestatakse kontrollikoja igus saada taotletud teavet.
Estimated most likely level of error Ű3.7 billion Yes 5.2 % (2017: 4.5 %) 
Hinnanguline kige tenolisem veamr 3,7 miljardit eurot Jah 5,2 % (2017. aastal 4,5 %)
41 Example: Procurement error The Commission concluded a contribution agreement with an international organisation to support public finance management in Jamaica. 
41 Nide: hankeviga Komisjon slmis he rahvusvahelise organisatsiooniga rahalist toetust ksitleva lepingu Jamaica riigi rahanduse juhtimise toetamiseks.
The total contract value and EU contribution was Ű5 million. 
Lepingu kogumaht ja ELi rahaline osalus oli 5 miljonit eurot.
When procuring supplies (Ű193 700) for the project, the organisation considered only its member countries as eligible suppliers. 
Projekti jaoks tarnete hankimisel (193 700 eurot) luges see organisatsioon nuetele vastavateks pakkujateks vaid oma liikmetest riikide ettevtteid.
This excluded several countries, including some EU Member States, which should be eligible for EDF-funded projects. 
Seetttu ji vlja mitu riiki, sealhulgas mned ELi liikmesriigid, kellel peaks samuti olema igus EAFist rahastatavates projektides osaleda.