natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
IX. (a) The Commission fully recognises the importance of the national ownership on a disaster response and addresses this issue both in its humanitarian assistance (requirement for partners to coordinate with national and local authorities, support to UNOCHA, field coordination by Delegations and DG ECHO) and in its development programmes. (b) The Commission fully endorses the CourtŐs recommendation to clarify the roles of DG ECHO and DG Environment (Civil Protection Mechanism) to ensure a coherent approach. (c) The Commission had already identified the delays in some project components mentioned by the Court and had taken the required action (see paragraph 35). 
IX. a) Komisjon nustub tielikult, et riigi enda reageerimisvime nnetustele on oluline ja pab parandada sellega seotud tegevust nii humanitaarabi osutamisel (nue koostpartneritele koordineerida oma tegevust riigi ja kohalike ametiasutustega, toetus RO ECHO projektidele, komisjoni delegatsiooni ja ECHO peadirektoraadi koordineerimistegevus kohapeal) kui ka komisjoni arenguprogrammides. b) Komisjon toetab tielikult kontrollikoja soovitust ECHO peadirektoraadi ja keskkonna peadirektoraadi (kodanikukaitse mehhanism) rollide selgemaks muutmise kohta, et tagada htne lhenemisviis. c) Komisjon on juba teadlik teatavate projektiosade teostamisel tekkinud viivitustest, millele kontrollikoda thelepanu juhtis, ning vtnud vajalikud meetmed (vt punkt 35).
The Commission considers that it is not appropriate to change the regulatory base in order to extend the time-frame for primary emergency and emergency humanitarian actions. (d) The Commission will reinforce the monitoring system to accommodate the CourtŐs recommendations in the most appropriate manner. (e) Following discussions with the concerned organisations, this matter was clarified and the Commission gained access to the relevant documents. 
Komisjoni arvates ei ole asjakohane muuta eeskirju, et pikendada erakorralise abi ja humanitaarabi meetmete ajakava. d) Komisjon tiustab seiressteemi, et rakendada kontrollikoja soovitusi parimal vimalikul viisil. e) Prast asjaomaste organisatsioonidega peetud arutelusid on olukord lahenenud ja komisjon sai juurdepsu asjakohastele dokumentidele.
The verification of Commission funded projects undertaken by UN Agencies is a subject that was addressed within the April 2006 meeting of the EC-UN FAFA working group. 
Komisjoni rahastatavate ja RO agentuuride kaudu teostatavate projektide kontrollimist arutati Euroopa henduse ja RO vahelise finants-ja haldusraamistiku kokkuleppe (FAFA) trhma koosolekul 2006. aasta aprillis.
INTRODUCTION 7. 
SISSEJUHATUS 7.
As regards the Rapid Reaction Mechanism and the process of linking relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD), see the CommissionŐs reply to point 26. 
Kiirreageerimise korra ning hdaabi, taastamis-ja arendustegevuse hendamiseprotsessi kohta vt komisjoni vastust punktile 26.
OBSERVATIONS 18. 
THELEPANEKUD 18.
The CommissionŐs policy is built on a needs based approach. 
Komisjoni poliitika lhtub vajadustest.
Where a partner is not able to benefit fully, then the funding is reduced by the Commission even if the initial plan was otherwise. 
Kui abisaaja ei ole vimeline kasutama abi ties mahus, vhendab komisjon omapoolset rahastamist isegi juhul, kui esialgne plaan oli toimida vastupidi.
22. (a) supported the relevant UN Agency in its role as sectorial leader for livelihood recovery. 
22. a) jaomast RO agentuuri, kes on elatusvahendite jaotamise peamine korraldaja.
As a result of these projects problems of coverage, overlap, gaps and competition were mitigated and/or limited in both countries. 
Nende projektidega seotud probleeme (kattumine, hlmamata alad ja valdkonnad, projektidevaheline konkurents) oli mlemas riigis vhe ja/vi need olid piiratud ulatusega.
The situation of overprovision of aid in some sectors and not sufficient aid in others, as described in the special report, was not related to the humanitarian aid provided by the Commission. 24 and 25. 
Eriaruandes kirjeldatud olukord, kus mnele piirkonnale osutati abi lemra ja teistes ebapiisavalt, ei olnud seotud komisjoni osutatud humanitaarabiga. 24.Đ25.
While there may have been some specific coordination difficulties at the field level, the overall level of coordination has improved compared to previous emergencies. 
Kuigi kohapeal oli teatavaid probleeme, on ldine koordineerimise tase eelnevate hdaabiolukordadega vrreldes paranenud.
Within the critical period of the emergency, Commission services kept one another regularly informed, with contacts at least twice a day on average, and an exchange of information notes and situation reports. 
Hdaabi osutamise kriitilisel perioodil teavitasid komisjoni teenistused ksteist korrapraselt, keskmisel vhemalt kaks korda pevas, ning vahetasid olukorra kohta teatisi ja aruandeid.
The Commission will seek to further improve coordination between DG ECHO and the Civil Protection Mechanism as recommended by the Court. 
Vastavalt kontrollikoja nuannetele pab komisjon ka edaspidi ECHO peadirektoraadi ja kodanikukaitse mehhanismi vahelise tegevuse koordineerimist parandada.
In both Sri Lanka and Indonesia, the Commission has 
Nii Sri Lankal kui ka Indoneesias toetas komisjon as-
C 170/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.7.2006 In addition to the projects mentioned by the Court, other Rapid Reaction Mechanism funded projects included a civil society consultation on post-tsunami reconstruction plans in the early stages of the preparation of the blueprint by the national government and a support to strengthening local government capacity in dealing with reconstruction. 
C 170/20 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21.7.2006 Lisaks kontrollikoja loetletud projektidele hlmasid muud kiirreageerimise korral phinevad projektid kodanikuhiskonna teavitamist tsunamijrgse lesehitust kavandamisest riigi valitsuse vastava kava ettevalmistamise algstaadiumis ning toetust kohaliku omavalitsuse lesehitustdega seotud suutlikkuse tstmiseks.
By the end of 2006, the Commission will have committed a total of 350 million euro for the reconstruction phase, including 12 million euro from the Rapid Reaction Mechanism. 
2006. aasta lpuks on komisjon eraldanud lesehitusele 350 miljonit eurot, millest 12 miljonit on eraldatud kiireageerimise korra kohaselt.
Where considered necessary, feedback on the project is communicated by DG ECHO (HQ) to the CommissionŐs partners. 
Vajadusel annab ECHO peadirektoraat komisjoni koostpartneritele tagasisidet.
Nevertheless, the Commission recognises the need to collate existing instructions in the form of specific guidelines. 
Komisjon tunnistab vajadust olemasolevaid juhiseid koondavate erisuuniste koostamiseks.
The Commission was aware of the short delay in reporting. 
Komisjon oli aruandluse mningasest hilinemisest teadlik.
However, given the magnitude of the disaster and the challenges faced by the implementing partners, these delays were not considered to be significant. 
Arvestades katastroofi ulatust ja vljakutseid mille ees koostpartnerid seisid, ei olnud viidatud hilinemine mrkimisvrne.
32. Concerning access to documents maintained by UN Agencies, this problem has been addressed in the context of the FAFA working group. 
32. RO agentuuride juurdepsu dokumentidele ksitleti FAFA trhma raames.
In addition to the tsunami projects controlled in the field, the Commission checks the supporting documentation when it is restituted to the partnerŐs headquarters. 
Lisaks kohapeal kontrollitud tsunamiga seotud projektidele kontrollib komisjon ka koostpartnerite peakorteritele edastatud tiendavaid dokumente.
The cases identified by the Court had already been identified by the CommissionŐs humanitarian and technical support personnel (field experts) during project monitoring and resulted in actions taken at headquarters level. 
Kontrollikoja tuvastatud juhtumid oli komisjoni humanitaar-ja tehnilise abi personal (kohal viibivad eksperdid) juba tuvastanud projektijre-levalve kigus ning vtnud meetmeid peakorteri tasandil.
In the case of the UN project mentioned in box 7 the Commission did not reimburse the cost of the treatment plant at Pramuka. 
Komisjon nudis, et koostpartner kiirendaks aeglaseid hankemeetmeid, mis phjustasid viivitusi vee-ja kanalisatsioonisektori edasisel erakorralisel rahastamisel.
Information on what has been done where is provided in partnersŐ interim, pre-final and final reports, instead of in the monitoring reports. 
Seirearuannete asemel saab teavet selle kohta, mida ja kus on tehtud, pigem koostpartnerite vahe-, eelviimastest ja lpparuannetest.
The Commission agrees with the Court that in the case of a UN Agency, sufficient information was not available during monitoring, but would like to highlight that action was taken by the Commission both at field and headquarters level and as a result detailed information on output was provided in the final report. 
Komisjon nustub kontrollikojaga, et RO agentuuriga seoses ei olnud kontrollkikude ajal piisavalt teavet, kuid rhutab, et komisjon vttis meetmeid nii kohapeal kui peakorteris ning ksikasjalik teave tulemuste kohta on esitatud lpparuandes.
The FAFA does not automatically oblige organisations to provide information on specific activities financed by the Commission. 
FAFA ei kohusta organisatsioone automaatselt komisjoni rahastatud eritegevusest teavitama.
All these incidents were detected by the CommissionŐs monitoring and have led to action being taken by the Commission. 
Kik need juhtumid avastati komisjoni kontrollkikude raames ning komisjon on vtnud vajalikud meetmed.
41. In the UNŐs case the needs assessment had been carried out in the week following the tsunami when little information was available but the need to deliver aid acute. 
41. RO hindas vajadusi tsunamijrgsel ndalal, kui teavet oli vhe, kuid vajadus abi jrele oli suur.
The fact that the UN Agency only reached 5 % of the beneficiaries does not mean that the remaining 95 % have not received assistance but rather that they were assisted by other agencies thus rendering UNŐs aid unnecessary. 
Seetttu alahinnati hinnangus rahvusvahelise ldsuse abi ulatust ning abisaajana veti arvesse kogu katastroofipiirkonna elanikkonda. Asjaolu, et RO agentuuri abi judis ainult 5 % kavandatud abivajajatest, ei thenda, et 95 % abi ei saanud.
The Commission recognised the problem at a very early stage and contributed to address it with specific actions like those described in box 4. 
Komisjon tuvastas probleemi juba varakult ja pdis seda 4. selgituses esitatud erimeetmetega parandada.
CONCLUSIONS 46. 
JRELDUSED 46.
It was therefore inevitable that the Commission should accept some standard emergency proposals in order to ensure that aid would flow quickly to the victims. 
Seeprast on enesestmistetav, et komisjon andis nusoleku teatavate standardsete hdaabi ettepanekute rahuldamiseks, et tagada abi kiire judmine ohvriteni.
Accurate needs assessments became only available in the second half of January 2005 and waiting for these would have implied that humanitarian organisations would not have received Commission funding until the end of January, which under the circumstances would have been clearly unacceptable. 
Vajaduste tpne hinnang koostati alles 2005. aasta jaanuari teisel poolel, selle jrele ootamine oleks thendanud, et humanitaar-abiorganisatsioonid ei oleks saanud kasutada komisjoni rahalisi vahendeid enne jaanuari lppu, mis oleks antud olukorda arvestades on tiesti lubamatu.
21.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 170/21 47. 
21.7.2006 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 170/21 47.
Within the critical period of the emergency, Commission services kept each other regularly informed, with contacts at least twice a day on average, and an exchange of information notes and situation reports. 
Hdaabi osutamise kriitilisel perioodil teavitasid komisjoni talitused ksteist korrapraselt, keskmisel vhemalt kaks korda pevas, ning vahetasid olukorra kohta teatisi ja aruandeid.
Following discussions with the Commission field and headquarters the partner provided detailed information on activities which have been implemented in the final report. 
Prast komisjoni kohapealsete esinduste ja peakorteri ning koostpartnerite vahel toimunud arutelusid edastasid viimased lpparuandes ksikasjaliku teabe tehtud tde kohta.
In the case of the project mentioned by the Court, the partnerŐs needs assessment was carried out in the week immediately following the tsunami when little information was available and the need to deliver aid was pressing. 
Kontrollikoja nimetatud projekti puhul hindasid koostpartnerid vajadusi tsunamijrgsel ndalal, kui teavet oli vhe, kuid vajadus abi jrele oli terav.
The fact that the UN Agency reached only 5 % of the beneficiaries does not mean that the remaining 95 % were left without assistance but rather that they were assisted by other aid agencies thus rendering UN AgenciesŐ aid unnecessary. 
Asjaolu, et RO agentuuri abi judis ainult 5 % kavandatud abivajajatest, ei thenda, et lejnud 95 % abi ei saanud, vaid seda, et neid abistasid teised agentuurid ning seetttu nad RO abi ei vajanud.
RECOMMENDATIONS 50. 
SOOVITUSED 50.
In a crisis context, the Commission works through the UN system and has been supporting OCHA (financially and operationally) in their coordination role which includes liaising with the national authorities. 
Kriisi korral tegutseb komisjon RO ssteemi kaudu ning on toetanud RO Humanitaarksimuste koordineerimise Talitust (rahaliselt ja operatiivselt) koordineeri-mistegevuses, mis hlmab koostd riigi ametiasutustega.
Further, at field level, the Commission coordinates and exchanges information with the national authorities through its Delegations and, on more technical matters, through CommissionŐs humanitarian and technical support personnel present in the field. 
Kohapeal koosklastab komisjon oma tegevust ja vahetab teavet kohalike ametiasutustega komisjoni delegatsioonide kaudu ning tehnilistes ksimustes komisjoni humanitaar-ja tehnilise toe ko-hapealoleva personali kaudu.
In addition, partners funded by the Commission are required to coordinate with national and local authorities. 
Ka komisjoni rahastatud koostpartnerid peavad oma tegevust riigi ja kohalike ametiasutustega koosklastama.
The Commission also recognises that the capacity of governments to handle donor coordination in emergencies is best supported beforehand through structural development programmes (for instance in the context of improving the countryŐs preparedness to cope with natural disasters). 
Komisjon nustub, et valitsuste suutlikkust kriisiolukorras osutatud abi koordineerida on kige thusam ennetavalt toetada lbi struktuurse arengu programmide (niteks riigi ettevalmistatuse parandamiseks looduskatastroofidega toimetulekul).
The Commission fully endorses the CourtŐs recommendation to clarify the roles of DG ECHO and DG Environment (Civil Protection Mechanism). 
Komisjon toetab tielikult kontrollikoja soovitust ECHO peadirektoraadi ja keskkonna peadirektoraadi (kodanikukaitse mehhanismi) rollide selgemaks muutmise kohta.
The roles of the two services were discussed in May 2002, and lead to a Memorandum of Understanding between DG ECHO and DG Environment in March 2003. 
Kahe teenistuse rolle arutati 2002. aasta maikuus ning selle tulemusena koostati 2003. aasta mrtsis ECHO peadirektoraadi ja keskkonna peadirektoraadi vastastikuse mistmise memorandum.
In view of the experiences since that date and of the CourtŐs recommendation, the following steps will be taken: firstly, the Commission will better inform the institutions and organisations involved in international emergency assistance about the respective roles and functions of the CommunityŐs humanitarian assistance, managed by DG ECHO, and the Community Civil Protection Mechanism, managed by DG Environment, and the additional and specific assets the mechanism can provide to the victims affected by major natural disasters. 
Lhtudes hiljem omandatud kogemustest ja kontrollikoja soovitusest, vetakse jrgmised meetmed: esiteks parandab komisjon rahvusvahelises kriisiabis osalevate institutsioonide ja organisatsioonide teavitamist henduse humanitaarabi andmist korraldava ECHO peadirektoraadi ja kodanikukaitse mehhanismi eest vastutava keskkonna peadirektoraadi rol-lidest ning mehhanismi rakendamisega kaasnevatest lisa-ja erivrtusest suurte looduskatastroofide ohvritele.
In addition, a joint note from the relevant Commission services to EC Delegations in third countries in that respect is being prepared; secondly, the Commission is committed to take on board key recommendations made by both the HAC and Civil Protection Committee, notably as regards the need to further refine the terms of reference for the MIC operations. 
Asjaomased komisjoni talitused koostavad E delegatsioonide jaoks kolmandates riikides vastavasisulise histeatise; teiseks kohustus komisjon vtma arvesse nii kriisisituatsioonides rakendatavaid tervisekaitsemeetmeid kui ka tsiviilkaitsekomitee olulisi soovitusi, eriti seoses vajadusega mratleda edaspidi tpsemalt MIC-operatsioonide sisu.
The Commission had already identified the delays in some project components mentioned by the Court and taken the required action (see paragraph 35). 
Komisjon on juba teadlik teatavate projektiosade teostamisel tekkinud viivitustest, millele kontrollikoda thelepanu juhtis, ning vtnud vajalikud meetmed (vt punkt 35).
The Commission considers that it is not appropriate to change the regulatory base in order to extend the timeframe for primary emergency and emergency humanitarian actions. 
Komisjoni arvates ei ole asjakohane muuta eeskirju, et pikendada erakorralise abi ja humanitaarabi meetmete ajakava.
The Commission will reinforce the monitoring system to accommodate the CourtŐs recommendations in the most appropriate manner. (d) The Commission believes that while it is true that emphasis for DG ECHO (and the rest of the humanitarian actors) has moved towards the evaluation of results, achievements and impact, this does not mean that DG ECHO does not adequately monitor project activities. 
Komisjon tiustab seiressteemi, et rakendada kontrollikoja soovitusi parimal vimalikul viisil. d) Komisjon on arvamusel, et kuigi ECHO peadirektoraadilt (ja teistelt humanitaarabi osutajatelt) nutakse eelkige tulemuste, saavutuste ja mjude hindamist, ei thenda see, et peadirektoraat ei kontrolli projekti rakendamist nuetekohaselt.
Information on what has been done where is furthermore provided in partnersŐ interim, pre-final and final reports instead of in the monitoring reports. 
Teavet selle kohta, mida ja kus on tehtud, leiab lisaks ka koostpartnerite vahe-, eelviimastest ja lpparuannetest.
54. The matter has been reported to the UN and was discussed at the April 2006 meeting of the FAFA Working Group. 
54. ROd on olukorrast teavitatud ning ksimust on arutatud FAFA trhma 2006. aasta aprillis toimunud kohtumisel.
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 6/2006 concerning the environmental aspects of the CommissionŐs development cooperation, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2006/C 235/01) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONSANDTERMINOLOGY .................................................... 
29.9.2006 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 235/1 I (Teave) KONTROLLIKODA ERIARUANNE nr 6/2006, komisjoni arengukoostöö keskkonnaaspektid koos komisjoni vastustega (vastavalt EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 248 lõike 4 teisele lõigule) (2006/C 235/01) SISUKORD LÜHENDIDJATERMINID.....................................................
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMMISSIONŐS ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING .......................................................... 
SISSEJUHATUS .............................................................
Progress was made in 2005 in developing country environmental analysis for new Coun-tryStrategyPapersalthoughitsimpactcannotyetbeassessed .................... 
Taust.................................................................
Little has been done to mainstream the environment into budgetary support programmes Procedures for environmental mainstreaming at project level have not been sufficiently systematic ............................................................. 
Selgejaterviklikukeskkonnastrateegiavajadus ................................
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENVIRONMENT PROJECTS AND FACTORS INFLUENCINGEFFECTIVENESS ................................................ 
Sissejuhatus............................................................
Introduction ........................................................... 
KESKKONNAPROJEKTIDE TULEMUSLIKKUSE JA SEDA MÕJUTAVATE TEGURITE HINDA-MINE.....................................................................
Assessmentofprojecteffectiveness.......................................... 
Sissejuhatus............................................................
22 ANNEX II Ń Environment projects examined and an assessment of their effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Projektidetulemuslikkusehindamine ........................................
31 Analysis of factors affecting effectiveness of environment projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Projektideliigaambitsioonikaskavandamine ..............................
Delaysinprojectpreparationandimplementation.......................... 
Rahastamiseelujõulisuseebarealistlikkäsitlus .............................
Limitedprogressininstitutionalcapacitybuilding .......................... 
JÄRELDUSEDJASOOVITUSED ................................................
CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 
Soovitused . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recommendations ...................................................... 
28 Komisjonivastused.................................................................... 31