natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An extra field will be added to the module to create a link between CMS and the ECR database, making it also possible to access the information on the financial recovery situation provided by the Member State. operation prudently thanks to specific, clear-cut criteria and transparent legal procedure in particular based on: Ń annual global communications by Member States regarding the stage of their national recovery procedures, Ń attentive scrutiny of the files examined by the Task Force Recovery, Ń approved criteria to determine whether the non-recovered amounts should be charged to the Community Budget or to the Member State. 
An extra field will be added to the module to create a link between CMS and the ECR database, making it also possible to access the information on the financial recovery situation provided by the Member State. operation prudently thanks to specific, clear-cut criteria and transparent legal procedure in particular based on: Ń annual global communications by Member States regarding the stage of their national recovery procedures, Ń attentive scrutiny of the files examined by the Task Force Recovery, Ń approved criteria to determine whether the non-recovered amounts should be charged to the Community Budget or to the Member State.
The Commission wishes to point out that this case was not included in the TFR audit selection on account of the wrong amount reported in ECR. (b) The objective of the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 is, inter alia, to address the shortcomings pointed out by the Court by making Member Sates more responsible and by providing ex post controls in the clearance-of-accounts framework. (c) According to Article 280(2) of the EC Treaty ÔMember States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interestsŐ. 
The Commission wishes to point out that this case was not included in the TFR audit selection on account of the wrong amount reported in ECR. (b) The objective of the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 is, inter alia, to address the shortcomings pointed out by the Court by making Member Sates more responsible and by providing ex post controls in the clearance-of-accounts framework. (c) According to Article 280(2) of the EC Treaty ÔMember States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interestsŐ.
In its Communication COM(202) 671 final of 3 December 2002, the Commission recommended the initiation of corrective measures, namely: Ń setting up of the Task Force Recovery to speed up the treatment of the backlog, Ń modifying Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and therefore Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 to prevent new backlogs in the future. 
In its Communication COM(202) 671 final of 3 December 2002, the Commission recommended the initia-tion of corrective measures, namely: Ń setting up of the Task Force Recovery to speed up the treatment of the backlog, Ń modifying Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and therefore Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 to prevent new backlogs in the future.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law. 
4.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law.
However this does not amount to conferring a preferential status on CAP debts. 
However this does not amount to confering a preferential status on CAP debts.
Accepting transactions or partial payments are conditions to be assessed on a case-by-case approach on the basis of national law and in conjunction with the criteria as laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999. 
Accepting transactions or partial payments are conditions to be assessed on a case-by-case approach on the basis of national law and in conjunction with the criteria as laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999. been conducted with all the diligence required, the amounts in question are charged to defaulting Member States.
Ń the recovery procedure must be started as soon as possible after the irregularity has been detected and should be completed within four years of the fraud or irregularity first being reported. 
Ń the recovery procedure must be started as soon as possible after the irregularity has been detected and should be completed within four years of the fraud or irregularity first being reported.
If not, the Member State must show there has been no negligence. 
If not, the Member State must show there has been no negligence.
Ń the treatment of individual cases must be discussed in detail with all the Member States concerned. 
Ń the treatment of individual cases must be discussed in detail with all the Member States concerned.
As regards the procedural criteria, the questions to be answered are: Ń Has the recovery procedure started? 
As regards the procedural criteria, the questions to be answered are: Ń Has the recovery procedure started?
Can it be completed within a reasonable period? 
Can it be completed within a reasonable period?
Ń Has the recovery procedure not been completed for reasons of force majeure or for other compelling reasons? 
Ń Has the recovery procedure not been completed for reasons of force majeure or for other compelling reasons?
Ń Was recovery not initiated because of the negligence of the Member State or its failure to take action? 
Ń Was recovery not initiated because of the negligence of the Member State or its failure to take action?
The updated figures are: Ń charged to Member States: EUR 144 million, Ń charged to EAGGF: EUR 153 million. 
The updated figures are: Ń charged to Member States: EUR 144 million, Ń charged to EAGGF: EUR 153 million.
As regards the guiding principles: Ń if the whole amount cannot be recovered for objective reasons and the Member State has done all it can to recover the amount on time without displaying any negligence, the unrecovered amounts are charged to the Community budget. 
As regards the guiding principles: Ń if the whole amount cannot be recovered for objective reasons and the Member State has done all it can to recover the amount on time without displaying any negligence, the unre-covered amounts are charged to the Community budget.
Ń in all other cases, where the irregularity is attributed to the Member State or where the recovery procedures have not been conducted with all the diligence required, the amounts in question are charged to defaulting Member States. The Commission has undertaken to bring forward pro- 
Ń in all other cases, where the irregularity is attributed to the Member State or where the recovery procedures have not The Commission has undertaken to bring forward pro-
C 269/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions. 
C 269/24 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions.
In total, 443 cases were examined in the course of this audit, among them 343 cases for Italy. 
In total, 443 cases were examined in the course of this audit, among which them 343 cases for Italy.
In the (1) Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, United Kingdom. year 2003 the first basic analyses on the basis of the data of ECR database have been presented to Member States in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
The related clearance-of-accounts procedure for the bulk of examined files is ongoing. year 2003 the first basic analyses on the basis of the data of ECR database have been presented to Member States in the framework of the Working Group ŇIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsÓ.
The Commission endorses the CourtŐs statement on the weaknesses of the ECR system and has performed some analyses in which the use and the frequency of codes were examined. 
The Commission endorses the CourtŐs statement on the weaknesses of the ECR system and has performed some analyses in which the use and the frequency of codes were examined.
The Commission has asked Member States to update these cases during the Article 280 Working Group meeting of 12 March 2003 and Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ of 11 March 2003 (see paragraph 25). 
The Commission has asked Member States to update these cases the during Article 280 Working Group meeting of 12 March 2003 and Working Group ŇIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsÓ of 11 March 2003 (see paragraph 25).
The competent authorities of Member States are faced with some delicate legal interpretation of questions and this notwithstanding the guidance provided by the Commission for a uniform interpretation of the black list tool. 
The competent authorities of Member States are faced with some delicate legal interpretation of questions and this not-withstanding the guidance provided by the Commission for a uniform interpretation of the black list tool.
Among the difficulties put forward by Member States are: Ń the concept of Ôserious negligenceŐ is a legal concept unknown in certain Member States in civil law, having in some Member States more affinity with the criminal process, Ń the absence of an explicit clause which regulates liability in the case of a consortium or associated operators, Ń the risk of having to pay for damages for a blacklisting that was ultimately overturned, which could have serious financial consequences for the Member State involved. 
Among the difficulties put forward by Member States are: Ń the concept of Ňserious negligenceÓ is a legal concept unknown in certain Member States in civil law, having in some Member States more affinity with the criminal process, Ń the absence of an explicit clause which regulates liability in the case of a consortium or associated operators, Ń the risk of having to pay for damages for a blacklisting that was ultimately overturned, which could have serious financial consequences for the Member State involved.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/25 66. and 67. 
4.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 269/25 66. and 67.
Table 105 aims at: Ń overseeing and control of amounts of liabilities held by Member States, Ń reflection on the level of liabilities, Ń a tentative reconciliation of the data of Table 105 and the Paying AgenciesŐ debtorsŐ ledgers, and Table 104 with the ECR data base managed by OLAF. 
Table 105 aims at: Ń overseeing and control of amounts of liabilities held by Member States, Ń reflection on the level of liabilities, Ń a tentative reconciliation of the data of Table 105 and the Paying AgenciesŐ debtorsŐ ledgers, and Table 104 with the ECR data base managed by OLAF.
The Commission services are giving increased attention to this question through a scrutiny of the annual reports of the Certification Bodies. 
The Commission services are giving increased attention to this question through a scrutiny of the annual reports of the Certifi-cation Bodies.
The Commission informs Member States of OLAFŐs recommendations, which are only mere proposals at that stage, the final decision being taken by the College. 
The Commission informs Member States of OLAFŐs recommendations, which are only mere proposals at that stage, the final decision being taken by the College.
It is not excluded that some Member States already ÔanticipateŐ these recommendations and take them for granted. 
It is not excluded that some Member States already ŇanticipateÓ these recommendations and take them for granted.
During the clearance-of-accounts procedure, the Commission has very substantial powers; firstly, it is responsible for auditing and evaluating the Member StateŐs management of EAGGF Guarantee expenditure, and secondly, it is the institution which unilaterally decides which amounts to refuse for financing. 
During the clearance-of-accounts procedure, the Commission has very substantial powers; firstly, it is responsible for auditing and evaluating the Member StateŐs management of EAGGF Guarantee expenditure, and secondly, it is the institution which unilaterally decides which amounts to refuse for financing.
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements). 
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any con-dition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements).
The Commission has asked Members States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with the data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide. 
The Commission has asked Members States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with the data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide.
In 2000, on the initiative of the Commission and based on the same observations as the Court, proposals were discussed with Member States to remedy the situation of the ÔpendingŐ cases. 
In 2000, on the initiative of the Commission and based on the same observations as the Court, proposals were discussed with Member States to remedy the situation of the ŇpendingÓ cases.
Detailed instructions on the audit of the debtorsŐ ledgers have been provided to the Certifying Bodies. 
Detailed instructions on the audit of the debtorsŐ ledgers have been provided to the Certifying Bodies.
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing a comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action. 
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ŇIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsÓ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing a comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action.
C 269/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures. 
C 269/26 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures.
Some of the changes welcomed by the Court are already in place. 
Some of the changes welcomed by the Court are already in place.
Ń Ń Ń Ń The Commission has invited Member States to proceed to a tentative reconciliation of OLAF ECR/595 data and the debtorsŐ ledgers data. 
Ń Ń Ń Ń The Commission has invited Member States to proceed to a tentative reconciliation of OLAF ECR/595 data and the debtorsŐ ledgers data.
However this does not amount to conferring a preferential status to CAP debts. 
However this does not amount to confering a preferential status to CAP debts.
Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń The quality of the available data related to CAP irregular payments should be improved. 
Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń The quality of the available data related to CAP irregular payments should be improved.
The recovery of irregulary paid amounts should be speeded up by the introduction by Member States of efficient measures. The Commission has undertaken to bring forward proposals to this effect (see paragraphs 39 and 41). 
The recovery of irregulary paid amounts should be speeded up by the introduction by Member States of efficient measures. The Commission has undertaken to bring forward proposals to this effect (see paragraphs 39 and 41).
77. number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002. 
The Commission applied four guiding principles and a number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002.
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action (see also answer in paragraph IX). 
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ŇIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsÓ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action (see also answer in paragraph IX).
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 4/2004 on the programming of the Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation Đ Interreg III, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph of the EC Treaty) (2004/C 303/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 
7.12.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 303/1 I (Teave) KONTROLLIKODA ERIARUANNE nr 4/2004, üleeuroopalist koostööd puudutava ühenduse algatuse Interreg III programmitöö kohta koos komisjoni vastustega (esitatud vastavalt Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artikli 248 lõike 4 teisele lõigule) (2004/C 303/01) SISUKORD KOKKUVÕTE .............................................................. SISSEJUHATUS .............................................................
Context ............................................................... MainfeaturesoftheInitiativefortheperiod2000to2006....................... TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................ 
Taust................................................................. Algatusepõhijoonedperioodil2000–2006 ...................................
THECOMMISSIONGUIDELINES ............................................... 
Kasabikõlblikudpiirkonnadontäpseltmääratletud? ............................
Objectivesandindicators ............................................. 
KOOSTÖÖETTEVALMISTUS-JAELLUVIIMISETAPIL...............................
Aretheeligibleareasclearlydefined? ........................................ 
Kaseelhindaminetoetabprogrammideettevalmistamist?.........................
TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
Kaseelmiseprogrammitööperiooditulemusivõetiarvesse? ......................
Is there complementarity between the Interreg III CIPs and traditional ERDF interven-tions?................................................................. 
Kas Interreg III ühenduse algatusprogrammid ja traditsioonilised ERF sekkumistegevused täiendavadüksteist?......................................................
Conclusion ............................................................ 
SAAVUTATUDEDUJÄRELHINDAMISEVÕIMALUS ...............................
Preparation and the start of implementation are generally characterised by coopera-tion.............................................................. 
Järeldus ...............................................................
Analyses are generally integrated but of little use; no connection exists between analyses and the definition of programme measures; the added value of projects needstobeenhanced ................................................ The available tools are inadequate to the task of measuring the impact of CIPs in rela-tiontotheirobjectives ............................................... 97-99 17 
Analüüsid on üldiselt integreeritud, kuid neist on vähe tulu; puudub seos analüüside ja programmimeetmete vahel; projektide lisaväärtust tuleb tõsta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Olemasolevate vahenditega ei saa mõõta ühenduse algatusprogrammide mõju nen-deeesmärkideseisukohast ............................................
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/3 CI CIP EEIG ERDF ESDP JTS Managing authority Monitoring committee NUTS Objective 1 Objective 2 Paying authority ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY Community Initiative. 
7.12.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 303/3 ERF Ettevalmistav komitee Euroopa majandushuvigrupp Euroopa ruumi arenguplaan Haldusasutus Järelevalvekomitee Makseasutus NUTS SF Eesmärk 1 Eesmärk 2 SWOT LÜHENDID JA SÕNASTIK Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fond Komitee, kes tagab projektide ühise väljavalimise ning järelevalve nende projektide käivitamise üle.
EEIGs are legal instruments established under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2137/85 of 25 July 1985 (OJ L 199, 31.7.1985, p. 
Tegemist on õigusliku struktuuriga, mis asutati nõukogu 25. juuli 1985. aasta määrusega (EMÜ) nr 2137/85 (EÜT L 199, 31.7.1985, lk 1).
1) to permit legal entities and natural persons from different Member States to form legal groupings. 
Euroopa majandushuvigrupp võimaldab eri liikmesriikide juriidilistel ja füüsilistel isikutel õiguslikul alusel ühendusi moodustada.
European Regional Development Fund European Spatial Development Perspective. A discretionary and non-binding intergovernmental document adopted in Potsdam in May 1999 by the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning. 
Valitsustevaheline soovitusliku iseloomuga ja õiguslikke piiranguid mittekehtestav dokument, mis võeti vastu Potsdamis 1999. aasta mais toimunud maakorralduse eest vastutavate ministrite mitteametlikul nõukogul.
It is a policy framework that was adopted to improve cooperation between Community sectoral policies with significant spatial impacts. 
Tegemist on poliitiliste suundumuste raamistikuga, mille eesmärgiks on parandada koostööd ühenduse sektoripõhiste poliitikate osas, millel on märkimisväärne mõju territooriumile.
An authority or body designated to manage an intervention programme. 
Ametivõim või asutus, kelle ülesandeks on tegevusprogrammi haldamine.
It is responsible, on the one hand, for the efficiency and correctness of management and, on the other hand, for implementation (receiving, examining and evaluating proposed operations, gathering data, drawing up the annual report, organising the mid-term evaluation, etc.). 
Haldusasutus vastutab ühelt poolt halduse tõhususe ja õiguspärasuse ning teiselt poolt programmi elluviimisega seotud küsimuste eest (tegevusettepanekute vastuvõtmine, läbivaatus ja hindamine, andmete kogumine, aastaaruannete ja vahehinnangute esitamine jne).
Body appointed for each programme by the Member States concerned. 
Asutus, mille on liikmesriigid määranud igale programmile.