natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The actual accommodation needs were finally identified on the basis of a census carried out at the beginning of August 2009, i.e. four months after the earthquake and more than two months after the contracts for the construction of CASE housing had been awarded. 
Tegelik majutusvajadus tehti lõpuks kindlaks 2009. aasta augusti alguses tehtud rahvaloenduse abil ehk neli kuud pärast maavärinat ja enam kui kaks kuud pärast seda, kui CASE-majutuse ehitamise lepingud olid sõlmitud.
The census provided reliable information on the actual needs of the population, as it also provided information on the people’s preferences concerning temporary accommodation ar-rangements17 and led to the subsequent construction of 19 additional apartment blocks18. 
Loenduse abil saadi usaldusväärne teave elanike tegelike vajaduste kohta, sest see kajastas ka inimeste eelistusi seoses ajutise majutuskorraga17. Selle tulemusel ehitati juurde 19 korterelamut18.
16 The European Civil Protection Mechanism’s technicians participated in the assessment. 
16 Hindamises osalesid Euroopa kodanikukaitse mehhanismi asjatundjad.
They were satisfied with the quality of the assessment of buildings. 
Nad jäid hoonete hindamise kvaliteediga rahule.
See Community Civil Protection Mechanism,‘Technical Report — Community Civil Protection Mechanism Assessment Mission — Italy Earthquake 2009’, April 2009. 
Vt aruanne Community Civil Protection Mechanism – Technical Report – Community Civil Protection Mechanism Assessment Mission, Italy Earthquake 2009, aprill 2009.
17 The choice was between CASE or lump sum grants for people who found accommodation by themselves. 
17 Valida sai kas CASE-majutuse või kindlasummalise toetuse vahel neile, kes endale ise majutuse leidsid.
18 The number of blocks was initially increased from 150 to 166 and, after the census, to 185. 
18 Korterelamute arvu suurendati alguses 150lt 166ni ning pärast rahvaloendust 185ni.
17 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
17 Eriaruanne nr 24/2012 – Euroopa Liidu solidaarsusfondi abi seoses 2009. aasta Abruzzo maavärinaga: tegevuse asjakohasus ja maksumus
As the data concerning displaced population were not available on a timely basis, it was only on the basis of the census in August 2009 that it became clear that the housing needs exceeded the planned number of apartments, which had to be assigned on the basis of priority criteria. 
Elanikkonna ümberpaigutamist käsitlev teave ei olnud õigeaegselt kättesaadav ning seetõttu sai alles augustis 2009 tehtud rahvaloenduse abil selgeks, et majutusvajadused ületasid kavandatud korterite arvu. Korterid tuli inimeste vahel jagada prioriteetsuse kriteeriumide alusel.
Table 3 shows the number of families requesting temporary housing and the number of available CASE apartments. 
Tabelis 3 on esitatud ajutist majutust vajanud perede ning saadaolnud CASE-korterite arv.
According to these data, requests for a CASE apartment could not be met for 4 294 families, or around 8 800 people. 
Nende andmete kohaselt ei saanud CASE-korterit võimaldada 4 294 perele (ligikaudu 8 800 inimesele).
Although the number of CASE blocks was increased from 150 to 185, in April 2012 there were still 11 292 people receiving lumps sums for rent at a monthly cost of more than 3 million euro, 162 people living in hotels and 142 in Guardia di Finanza barracks19. 
Kuigi CASE-korterelamute arvu suurendati 150lt 185ni, sai 2012. aasta aprilli seisuga 11 292 inimest ikka veel kindlasummalist toetust üüri maksmiseks (igakuine kulu üle 3 miljoni euro), 162 inimest elasid hotellides ja 142 Guardia di Finanza kasarmutes19.
18 TABLE 3 FAMILIES REQUESTING AND HOUSED IN CASE APARTMENTS Total Requesting CASE accommodation Assigned a CASE apartment Families assessed 15 752 8 715 4 421 With more than 6 members 69 49 26 With 6 members 202 168 120 With 5 members 708 536 408 With 4 members 2 407 1 750 1 309 With 3 members 3 046 1 998 1 486 With 2 members 3 883 2 203 935 With 1 member 5 437 2 011 137 Source: Department of Civil Protection. 
18 TABLE 3 CASE‐KORTERIT TAOTLENUD JA SELLE SAANUD PEREKONNAD Kokku Taotlesid CASE-majutust Said CASE-majutuse Küsitletud perekonnad 15 752 8 715 4 421 Üle kuue liikme 69 49 26 6 liiget 202 168 120 5 liiget 708 536 408 4 liiget 2 407 1 750 1 309 3 liiget 3 046 1 998 1 486 2 liiget 3 883 2 203 935 1 liige 5 437 2 011 137 Allikas: kodanikukaitse osakond.
... MOST OF THE APARTMENTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE BEFORE WINTER 27. The aim of accommodating the population in apartments before the winter (see paragraph 21) was not completely achieved. 
...SUUREM OSA KORTEREID EI OLNUD ENNE TALVE KÄTTESAADAVAD 27. Eesmärki majutada elanikkond korteritesse enne talve tulekut (vt punkt 21) ei saavutatud täielikult.
Even though the first apartments were ready by the end of September 2009 (less than six months after the earthquake) and the apartment blocks were constructed according to plan, only around 6 300 of the 15 000 people envisaged in the implementation agreement could be housed before the end of November. 
Kuigi esimesed korterid valmisid 2009. aasta septembri lõpuks (vähem kui kuus kuud pärast maavärinat) ja korterid ehitati vastavalt ajakavale, oli enne novembri lõppu võimalik rakendamislepingus kavandatud 15 000 inimesest majutada vaid 6 300.
The last apartments were made available in March 2010 (see Table 4). 
Viimased korterid said valmis märtsis 2010 (vt tabel 4).
Therefore, additional accommodation costs could not be avoided as, in the meantime, people in need of accommodation spent the winter in hotels. 
Seega ei olnud võimalik vältida lisakulutusi majutusele, sest peavarju vajavad inimesed pidid veetma talve hotellides.
This delay was a consequence of the time needed to launch the necessary procurement procedures and of the need to identify suitable construction sites, which had to be analysed with regard to their seismic, hydrological and geological safety. 
Viivitus tulenes sellest, et vajalike hankemenetluste käivitamiseks oli vaja aega ning ühtlasi tuli leida sobivad ehitusplatsid, mille seismilist, hüdro-loogilist ja geoloogilist ohutust tuli omakorda analüüsida.
Although Italy is at high seismic risk (see Annex III), it was the first time that the Department of Civil Protection adopted such a strategy. 
Kuigi Itaalias on suur maavärinaoht (vt III lisa), võttis kodanikukaitse osakond sellise strateegia vastu esmakordselt.
Thus, the technical specifications and tender documents for the CASE houses were only prepared after the earthquake20. 
Seetõttu koostati CASE-majade tehnilised kirjeldused ja hankedokumendid alles pärast maavärinat20.
Nevertheless, it was possible to launch the first procurement procedures on 22 May 2009, only one and a half months after the earthquake. 
Sellegipoolest käivitati esimesed hankemenetlused 22. mail 2009, kõigest poolteist kuud pärast maavärinat.
TABLE 4 PROGRESSION IN THE DELIVERY OF CASE APARTMENTS 20 Recently, the Department of Civil Protection drafted technical specifications for different solutions to be procured via framework contracts. 
20 Hiljuti koostas kodanikukaitse osakond raamlepingute alusel teostatavate lahenduste tehnilised kirjeldused.
An ad hoc agreement for this purpose was signed on 13 March 2012 with CONSIP, a public stock company acting as central purchasing body for the Italian public administration. 
Selleks sõlmiti 13. märtsil 2012 ajutine leping CONSIPiga, mis on riiklik aktsiaselts ja toimib Itaalia riigiasutuste keskse hankijana.
19 Date Apartments delivered People accommodated 29.9.2009 300 1 042 30.10.2009 825 2 973 30.11.2009 1 694 6 328 31.12.2009 2 941 10 625 31.1.2010 3 588 12 772 28.2.2010 4 357 14 554 10.3.2010 4 415 14 649 Source: Department of Civil Protection. 
19 TABEL 4 CASE‐KORTERITE ÜLEANDMISE AJAKAVA Kuupäev Üle antud korterid Majutatud inimeste arv 29.9.2009 300 1 042 30.10.2009 825 2 973 30.11.2009 1 694 6 328 31.12.2009 2 941 10 625 31.1.2010 3 588 12 772 28.2.2010 4 357 14 554 10.3.2010 4 415 14 649 Allikas: kodanikukaitse osakond.
For the CASE project, the Department of Civil Protection signed contracts for a total amount of 710 million euro (excluding VAT)21, including civil works, green areas, furniture and other costs. 
Kodanikukaitse osakond sõlmis CASE-projekti jaoks lepinguid kogusummas 710 miljonit eurot (käibemaks maha arvatud)21, summa sisaldas ehitustöid, haljasalade rajamist, mööblit ja muid kulusid.
A breakdown of the costs that are relevant for the calculation of the cost of the CASE apartments per square metre, i.e. excluding costs for furniture, civil works, demolition, electro-mechanic works and green areas (amounting to 112,5 million euro, see Annex II), is shown in Table 5. 
Tabelis 5 on esitatud nende kulude jaotus, mis on olulised CASE-korterite ruutmeetri maksumuse arvutamiseks, st välja arvatud kulud mööblile, ehitustöödele, lammutamisele, elektritöödele ja haljastusele (mis olid kokku 112,5 miljonit eurot, vt II lisa).
The average construction cost of each of the 185 apartment blocks was 3 230 629 euro, giving a construction cost for each of the 4 449 apartments of 134 337 euro. 
Iga korterelamu (kokku 185) keskmine ehituskulu oli 3 230 629 eurot, mis teeb iga korteri (kokku 4 449) ehituskuluks 134 337 eurot.
21 In addition, there were costs amounting to 9 million euro for connecting the apartments to the electricity and gas grids and 11 million euro in technical costs that were not relevant for the calculation of the construction cost. 
21 Lisaks veel 9 miljoni euroni ulatuvad korterite elektri-ja gaasivõrku ühendamise kulud ning 11 miljoni euro suurused tehnilised kulud, mida ehituskulude arvutamisel ei arvestatud.
20 TABLE 5 CASE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IN EURO Type of works Contracted % of total Elevators 9 810 023 1,6 Buildings 425 305 706 71,2 Casting/concrete reinforcement 55 160 175 9,2 Concrete 27 344 339 4,6 Welded steel mesh 15 927 758 2,7 Pillars 37 562 778 6,3 Seismic isolators 12 013 512 2,0 Excavations 14 542 086 2,4 TOTAL 597 666 377 100,0 Source: European Court of Auditors’ analysis based on documents delivered by the Department of Civil Protection. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
20 TABEL 5 CASE‐HOONETE EHITUSE MAKSUMUS EURODES Tööde liik Kohustusi võetud % kogusummast Liftid 9 810 023 1,6 Hooned 425 305 706 71,2 Valutööd / betooni sarrustamine 55 160 175 9,2 Betoon 27 344 339 4,6 Keevitatud terasvõrk 15 927 758 2,7 Postid 37 562 778 6,3 Seismilised isolaatorid 12 013 512 2,0 Kaevetööd 14 542 086 2,4 KOKKU 597 666 377 100,0 Allikas: Euroopa Kontrollikoja analüüs kodanikukaitse osakonna esitatud dokumentide alusel. Eriaruanne nr 24/2012 – Euroopa Liidu solidaarsusfondi abi seoses 2009. aasta Abruzzo maavärinaga: tegevuse asjakohasus ja maksumus
The Court compared the cost of the CASE houses with standard costs applied in Italy (see Figure 3) on the basis of a commonly used reference manual22. 
Kontrollikoda võrdles üldkasutatava käsiraamatu22 alusel CASE-majade maksumust Itaalias kohaldatavate standardkuludega (vt joonis 3).
Thus, the number of square metres was calculated in accordance with the calculation method used in that manual. 
Seega arvutati ruutmeetrite arv vastavalt käsiraamatus kasutatavale arvutus-meetodile.
The basis for calculating the cost per square metre was 1 960 square metres per apartment block23. 
Ruutmeetri hind arvutati 1 960 ruutmeetri alusel korterelamu kohta23.
The unit cost was 1 648 euro/square metre of living area24, including the cost of parking spaces. 
Ühe korterelamu maksumus oli 1 648 eurot elamispinna ruutmeetri kohta24, mis sisaldab parkimiskohtade maksumust.
The reference manual establishes, for social housing, a base price of around 1 153 euro/square metre, including parking spaces25, compared to which the CASE blocks were, on average, 43 % more expensive. 
Käsiraamatus on sätestatud sotsiaalelamute baashinnaks 1 153 eurot ruutmeetri eest (koos parkimiskohtadega)25, CASE-korterelamud olid keskmiselt 43% kallimad.
However, for prefabricated apartments the standard cost was around 640 euro/square metre26 for 5 964 square metre blocks, against which the CASE housing was, on average, 158 % more expensive27 28. 
Kokkupandavate korterelamute standardkulud olid aga 640 eurot ruutmeetri kohta26 5 964 ruutmeetrise korterelamu puhul, millega võrreldes oli CASE-majutus keskmiselt 158% kallim27 28.
IMPACT OF THE EMERGENCY AND SEISMIC ISOLATION 33. 
HÄDAOLUKORRA JA SEISMILISE ISOLATSIOONI MÕJU 33.
According to the Department of Civil Protection, the requirement to implement the project rapidly had an impact on the selection of construction materials, working methods and contractors. 
Kodanikukaitse osakonna hinnangul avaldas projekti kiire rakendamise nõue mõju ehitusmaterjalide, töömeetodite ja töövõtjate valikule.
The Court quantified the impact of these factors to have been around 27 million euro: (a) The pillars for the construction of the CASE houses were made of steel because these could be delivered more rapidly than the concrete pillars used under normal circumstances. 
Kontrollikoda kvantifitseeris nimetatud faktorite mõju ning leidis, et see oli ca 27 miljonit eurot: a) CASE-hoonete ehitusel kasutati terasposte, kuna neid oli võrreldes tavaolukorras kasutatavate betoonpostidega võimalik kiiremini kohale tuua.
However, they were also more than twice as expensive as the price negotiated for concrete pillars29, which implied additional costs amounting to more than 21 million euro. (b) The concrete needed to be workable under all possible weather conditions and had to dry rapidly, which necessitated the use of very high-quality concrete with expensive chemical additives that implied a supplement of around 16 %, or 4 million euro30. 
Teraspostide maksumus oli aga kahekordne võrreldes betoonpostide kokkulepitud hinnaga29, mis tähendas üle 21 miljoni euro suuruseid lisakulusid. b) Betoon pidi olema kõikvõimalikes ilmastikuoludes töödeldav ning kiiresti kuivav, mis tingis vajaduse väga kõrge kvaliteediga ja kalleid keemilisi lisandeid sisaldava betooni järele, mis suurendas kulusid ligikaudu 16% ehk 4 miljoni euro võrra30.
22 Prezzi Tipologie Edilizie, Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano, 2010, Edizione Dei. 
22 Prezzi Tipologie Edilizie, Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano, 2010 – Edizione Dei.
23 The reference manual refers to the total walkable surface. 
23 Käsiraamat viitab kogu elamispinnale.
Thus, the Court took the average of 1 834 square metres offered by the successful bidders, which included 30 % of around 180 square metres in balconies and staircases, and added the remaining 70 % of those areas. 
Seega võttis kontrollikoda aluseks edukate pakkujate pakutud keskmise –1 834 ruutmeetrit –, mis hõlmas 30% ligikaudu 180 ruutmeetri suurusest rõdude ja treppide pindalast, ning lisas ülejäänud 70%.
24 The cost calculated by the Court differs from the cost declared by the Italian Department of Civil Protection (1 314 euro/square metre) mainly because of a different calculation of the square metres of surface area. 
24 Kontrollikoja arvutatud kulud erinevad Itaalia kodanikukaitse osakonna deklareeritud kuludest (1 314 eurot ruutmeetri kohta) peamiselt selle tõttu, et pindala ruutmeetreid arvutati erinevalt.
The Department of Civil Protection based its calculation on a surface of 2 333 square metres, which differs from the method used by the reference manual. 
Kodanikukaitse osakonna kalkulatsioon põhines 2 333 ruutmeetri suurusel pindalal, mis erineb käsiraamatus kasutatud meetodist.
Therefore, the cost declared by the Department of Civil Protection is not comparable with the cost reported in the manual. 
Kodanikukaitse osakonna deklareeritud kulud ei ole seega käsiraamatus esitatud kuludega võrreldavad.
25 Social housing (edificio in edilizia convenzionata); the cost without parking was reported at 1 066 euro/square metre. 
25 Sotsiaalelamud, edificio in edilizia convenzionata; kulud (parkimiskulud välja arvatud) olid 1 066 eurot ruutmeetri kohta.
26 Industrialised building for civil accommodation (edificio di civile abitazione industrializzato), Prezzi Tipologie Edilizie, Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano, 2010, Edizione Dei. 
26 Inimeste majutamine kokkupandavates majades – Edificio di civile abitazione industrializzato, Prezzi Tipologie Edilizie, Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano, 2010 – Edizione Dei.
28 A higher-standard residential building of a similar size (1 754 square metres), including a large number of more expensive garages instead of parking spaces, costs 1 294 euro/square metre of living area (including parking and garages), against which the cost of the CASE apartments was still 27 % higher. 
21 28 Kõrgematele standarditele vastavad sama suurusega (1 754 ruutmeetrit) korterelamud, mis hõlmavad suuremal arvul kallimaid garaaže parkimiskohtade asemel, maksavad 1 294 eurot elamispinna ruutmeetri kohta (sh parkimiskohad ja garaažid). CASE-korterite maksumus oli nendega võrreldes ikkagi 27% kõrgem.
29 The average unit price for steel pillars was 6 061,45 euro, whereas the final unit price of concrete pillars was 2 743,23 euro. 
29 Teraspostide keskmine ühikuhind oli 6 061,45 eurot, betoonpostide lõplik ühikuhind oli 2 743,23 eurot.
30 This difference corresponds to the average price difference between concrete class XC4 (Rck 30 N/mm2), used for the seismically isolated platform, or class XF1 (Rck 40 N/mm2) used for the basement platform, and cheaper types of concrete (respectively class XC1 or Xf2). Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
30 Erinevus vastab keskmisele hinnavahele betooni klassi XC4 (Rck 30 N/mm2), mida kasutatakse seismiliselt isoleeritud paneeli puhul, või klassi XF1 (Rck 40N/mm2), mida kasutatakse keldripaneeli puhul, ning odavamate betooni tüüpide vahel (vastavalt klass XC1 või Xf2). Eriaruanne nr 24/2012 – Euroopa Liidu solidaarsusfondi abi seoses 2009. aasta Abruzzo maavärinaga: tegevuse asjakohasus ja maksumus
(c) Because only a few companies offered to construct more than one of the 30 lots within the short deadlines, the contracts were awarded to 16 different bidders. 
c) Kuna vaid üksikud ettevõtted pakkusid lühikese aja jooksul ehitustööde tegemist rohkem kui ühel 30 maatükist, sõlmiti lepingud 16 erineva pakkujaga.
Had it been possible to award the contracts to the nine highest-ranked bidders, savings of around 2 million euro could have been achieved. (d) Because the contractors had to implement a big project within a short time, they also had to pay more for materials and labour, as works were carried out in three shifts. 
Kui oleks olnud võimalik sõlmida lepingud üheksa kõige kõrgemalt hinnatud pakkujaga, oleks säästetud ligikaudu 2 miljonit eurot. d) Kuna töövõtjad olid kohustatud suure projekti ühikese aja jooksul ellu viima, pidid nad materjalide ja tööjõu eest ka rohkem maksma, sest töö toimus kolmes vahetuses.
These additional costs are not precisely quantifiable. 
Need lisakulud ei ole täpselt kvantifitseeritavad.
Part of the additional cost is due to the choice of seismically isolated building structure, which required not only seismic isolators, but also additional lifts and staircases connecting the isolated platform with the non-isolated basement. 
Osa lisakuludest tuleneb sellest, et valiti seismiliselt isoleeritud ehitus-konstruktsioon, mistõttu vajati mitte ainult seismilisi isoleermaterjale, vaid ka täiendavaid lifte ja treppe, mis ühendasid isoleeritud paneeli isoleerimata keldrikorrusega.
The Court has estimated this additional cost at around 23 million euro31. 
Kontrollikoja hinnangul oli lisakulude suuruseks ca 23 miljonit eurot31.
The revised price per square metre, without the cost due to the emergency situation and the additional cost for seismic isolation, was 1 510 euro (see Table 6), still considerably higher than for standard constructions (see Figure 3). 
Ülevaadatud ruutmeetrihind, mis ei sisalda hädaolukorrast tingitud kulusid ja seismilise isolatsiooni lisakulusid, oli 1 510 eurot (vt tabel 6), mis on ikkagi oluliselt kallim standardkonstruktsioonide hinnast (vt joonis 3).
TABLE 6 RECTIFIED COST OF THE CASE APARTMENTS 31 This cost includes 12 million euro for seismic isolators, around 3,5 million euro for the additional lifts (19 000 each), and 7,5 million euro for the additional staircases and lift frames (40 000 each). 
31 Lisakulud hõlmavad 12 miljonit eurot seismilisteks isoleermaterjalideks, ca 3,5 miljonit eurot lisaliftideks (19 000 eurot lifti kohta) ja 7,5 miljonit eurot täiendavateks treppideks ja liftišahtideks (40 000 trepi/ šahti kohta).
22 Description Amount (euro) Total construction cost 597 666 377 Minus: cost of urgent working methods – 27 000 000 Minus: cost of seismic isolation – 23 000 000 Rectified cost 547 666 377 Unit cost for 185 apartment blocks 2 960 358 Unit cost for 4 449 apartments 123 098 Price per m2 total surface (1 960 m2) 1 510 Source: European Court of Auditors’ own calculations. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
22 TABEL 6 CASE‐KORTERITE PARANDATUD MAKSUMUS Kirjeldus Summa (eurodes) Ehituskulud kokku 597 666 377 Miinus hädaolukorra töömeetodite kulud - 27 000 000 Miinus seismilise isolatsiooni kulud - 23 000 000 Parandatud kulusumma 547 666 377 185 korterelamu ühikukulud 2 960 358 4 449 korteri ühikukulud 123 098 Kogupindala hind ruutmeetri kohta (1 960 m2) 1 510 Allikas: Euroopa Kontrollikoja arvutused. Eriaruanne nr 24/2012 – Euroopa Liidu solidaarsusfondi abi seoses 2009. aasta Abruzzo maavärinaga: tegevuse asjakohasus ja maksumus
The cost incurred because of the emergency and the choice of equipping the buildings with seismic isolation could explain part of the additional cost of the CASE apartments. 
CASE-korterite lisakulusid võib osaliselt seletada hädaolukorraga ning otsusega varustada hooned seismilise isolatsiooniga.
However, it was also partly due to the limited number of bidders, short time limits and low importance accorded to the price when awarding contracts. 
Osaliselt olid lisakulud aga tingitud pakkujate arvu piiratusest, lühikestest tähtaegadest ja lepingute sõlmimisel hinnale omistatud vähesest tähtsusest.
THE NUMBER OF BIDDERS WAS LIMITED EXTREMELY SHORT TIME LIMITS FOR THE RECEIPT OF TENDERS 37. 
PAKKUJATE ARV OLI PIIRATUD ÄÄRMISELT LÜHIKESED TÄHTAJAD PAKKUMUSTE ESITAMISEKS 37.
Despite the possibilities offered by emergency procurement rules, the time limits for the receipt of tenders and requests to participate should be sufficiently long to allow interested parties a reasonable and appropriate period to prepare and submit their tenders, taking particular account of the complexity of the contract32. 
Hoolimata tingimustest, mida võimaldavad hädaolukorras kohaldatavad hanke-eeskirjad, peavad pakkumuste esitamise ja hankemenetluses osalemise taotluste esitamise tähtajad olema piisava pikkusega, et huvitatud osapooltel oleks võimalik mõistliku ja asjakohase perioodi jooksul oma pakkumus koostada ja esitada.
Longer deadlines facilitate broader competition and a higher quality of tenders, thus favouring the project’s success and the due consideration of economy factors. 
Pikemad tähtajad võimaldavad suuremat konkurentsi ja parema kvaliteediga hankeid, aidates kaasa projekti edenemisele ning säästlikkustegurite nõuetekohasele arvessevõtmisele.
FIGURE 3 COST COMPARISON OF CASE WITH STANDARD HOUSING 32 Article 70(12) of Decreto Legislativo of 12 April 2006, No 163 (the Italian Public Procurement Law), provides that whenever urgency situations make it impossible to comply with the minimum time limits envisaged by the law, the administration establishes the limits possibly taking due account of the complexity of the works and of the time necessary for preparing the bids. 
32 12. aprilli 2006. aasta Decreto Legislativo (Itaalia riigihankeseadus) nr 163 artikli 70 lõikes 12 sätestatakse, et kui hädaolukorrast tulenevalt on võimatu täita seadusega ette nähtud miinimumtähtaegu, kehtestavad ametivõimud piirangud, milles võetakse võimalusel nõuetekohaselt arvesse ehitustööde keerukust ja pakkumuste koostamiseks vajaminevat aega.