natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
218,8 92,6 50,9 159,8 91,7 125,2 708,2 632,4 126,2 74,6 21,0 9,2 474,4 22 % 108,9 14,8 3,8 369,1 17 % Local communities Processing plants Breakdown by main type of beneficiary and measure Farmers Various Measure: development and improvement of rural infrastructure Measure: improving the processing and marketing of agricultural and fishery products Measure: investments in agricultural holdings Measures: agri-environment, forestry, afforestation Measures: development and diversification of economic activities, technical assistance, training, and other ANNEX 1 EU contribution 2000-2003 by country and by main type of beneficiary and measure (in million euro) 
218,8 92,6 50,9 159,8 91,7 125,2 708,2 632,4 227,7 126,2 Meede: maapiirkondade infrastruktuuri arendamine ja parandamine Meede: põllumajandus-ja kalandustoodete töötlemise ja turustamise parandamine Meede: investeeringud põllumajandusettevõtetesse Meede: põllumajanduskesk-kond, metsamajandus, metsastamine Meede: majandustegevuse arendamine ja mitmekesistamine, tehniline abi, koolitus jm LISA 1 Eli aastatel 2000–2003 antud abi riikide ning abisaajate ja meetmete põhitüübi kaupa (miljonit eurot)
30.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 295/19 Sample No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Measure M 2 v v v v v v M 3 (4) BULGARIA Project description Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a tractor Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a combine harvester Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a combine harvester Purchase of new equipment for a meat processing plant Purchase of new equipment for a milk processing plant Purchase of new equipment for a meat processing plant Purchase of new equipment for a winery Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a combine harvester Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a combine harvester Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a combine harvester Purchase of new equipment for a meat processing plant Purchase of new equipment for a fruit and vegetable processing plant Construction of storehouses and purchase of a silos for a cereal farm Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm including a combine harvester Visit on the spot (1) v v v v v v v v Substantive test (2) v v v v v v v v v v v v v v Compliance test (3) v v v v v v M 1 M 2 M 3 M 1 v v v v v v v v Ń Ń Ń ANNEX 2 List of projects reviewed Investments in agricultural holdings Improving the processing and marketing of agricultural and fishery products Development and improvement of rural infrastructure (1) Visit on the spot to meet with the final beneficiary and to inspect the project. 
30.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja LISA 2 C 295/19 Valimi nr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Meede M 2 v v v v v v M 3 (4) BULGAARIA Projekti kirjeldus Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh traktori ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh kombaini ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh kombaini ostmine Lihatöötlemisettevõttele uute seadmete ostmine Piimatöötlemisettevõttele uute seadmete ostmine Lihatöötlemisettevõttele uute seadmete ostmine Veinitööstusele uute seadmete ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh kombaini ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh kombaini ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh kombaini ostmine Lihatöötlemisettevõttele uute seadmete ostmine Puu-ja juurviljade töötlemisettevõttele uute seadmete ostmine Teraviljatalule ladude ehitamine ja silo ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete, sh kombaini ostmine Kohapealne Vahetu test (2) külastus (1) v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v Vastavustest (3) v v v v v v M 1 M 2 M 3 M 1 v v v v v v v v — — — Läbivaadatud projektide nimekiri Investeeringud põllumajandusettevõtetesse Põllumajandus-ja kalandustoodete töötlemise ja turustamise parandamine Maapiirkondade infrastruktuuri arendamine ja parandamine (1) Kohapealne külastus lõpliku abisaajaga kohtumiseks ja projekti kontrollimiseks. (2) Toimiku ülevaatamine üldkulude, peamiste hanke-eeskirjade, eesmärkide ja teiste projektiga seotud peamiste teemade kontrollimiseks. (3) Toimiku ülevaatamine, et kontrollida järelevalve-ja kontrollisüsteemide tegelikku toimimist.
(4) Systems for the measure were not approved at the time of the audit. 
(4) Selle meetme süsteeme ei oldud auditi toimumise ajaks heaks kiidetud.
C 295/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2004 Sample No 1 v Measure M1M2M3 LITHUANIA Project description Modernisation works and purchase of new equipment for a dairy farm Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm Purchase of new equipment for a cereal farm Purchase of new equipment for a pig farm Purchase of new equipment for a dairy farm Purchase of new equipment for a dairy farm Purchase of new equipment for a meat processing plant Reconstruction works and purchase of new equipment for a meat processing plant Visit on the spot (1) v v v v v Substantive test (2) v v v v v v v v v v v Compliance test (3) v v v v v v v v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 v 6 v 7 8 9 10 11 12 v v v v v v Construction of water and sewage infrastructure Reconstruction of sewage infrastructure Construction of sewage infrastructure Construction of a slaughterhouse v (1) Visit on the spot to meet with the final beneficiary and to inspect the project. 
C 295/20 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 30.11.2004 Valimi nr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M 1 v v v v v v Meede M 2 v v M 3 LEEDU Projekti kirjeldus Piimatalu moderniseerimistööd ja uute seadmete ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete ostmine Teraviljatalule uute seadmete ostmine Seakasvatustalule uute seadmete ostmine Piimatalule uute seadmete ostmine Piimatalule uute seadmete ostmine Lihatöötlemisettevõttele uute seadmete ostmine Lihatöötlemisettevõtte rekonstrueerimistööd ja uute seadmete ostmine Vee-ja kanalisatsiooni infrastruktuuri ehitus Kanalisatsiooni infrastruktuuri rekonstrueerimine Kanalisatsiooni infrastruktuuri ehitus Tapamaja ehitus Kohapealne Vahetu test (2) külastus (1) v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v Vastavustest (3) v v v v v v v v 9 10 v 11 v 12 v v (1) Kohapealne külastus lõpliku abisaajaga kohtumiseks ja projekti kontrollimiseks.
(2) File review to check general costs, key procurement rules, objective and other key issues relating to the project. 
(2) Toimiku ülevaatamine üldkulude, peamiste hanke-eeskirjade, eesmärkide ja teiste projektiga seotud peamiste teemade kontrollimiseks.
(3) File review to check that the supervisory and control systems worked in practice. v 
(3) Toimiku ülevaatamine, et kontrollida järelevalve-ja kontrollisüsteemide tegelikku toimimist.
(3) File review to check that the supervisory and control systems worked in practice. 
(3) Toimiku ülevaatamine, et kontrollida järelevalve-ja kontrollisüsteemide tegelikku toimimist.
C 295/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2004 Sample No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 M 1 (4) Measure M 2 v v v v v M 3 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v ROMANIA Project description Reconstruction works at a meat processing plant Reconstruction works at a meat processing plant Reconstruction works at a meat processing plant Reconstruction works and purchase of new equipment for a meat processing plant Reconstruction works and purchase of new equipment for a winery Local road upgrading Local road upgrading Installation of a water supply system Construction of sewage and waste water treatment station Local road upgrading Local road upgrading Local road upgrading Local road upgrading Installation of a water supply system Installation of a water supply system Construction of a water supply system Local road upgrading Local road upgrading Local road upgrading Construction of extended water supply system Visit on the spot (1) v v v v v v v v v v v 42 Substantive test (2) v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v 75 Compliance test (3) v v v v v v v v 33 (1) Visit on the spot to meet with the final beneficiary and to inspect the project. 
C 295/22 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 30.11.2004 Valimi nr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 M 1 (4) Meede M 2 v v v v v M 3 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v RUMEENIA Projekti kirjeldus Rekonstrueerimistööd lihatöötlemisettevõttes Rekonstrueerimistööd lihatöötlemisettevõttes Rekonstrueerimistööd lihatöötlemisettevõttes Lihatöötlemisettevõtte rekonstrueerimistööd ja uute seadmete ostmine Veinitööstuse rekonstrueerimistööd ja uute seadmete ostmine Kohaliku tee parandamine Kohaliku tee parandamine Veevärgi paigaldamine Reoveepuhastusjaama ehitus Kohaliku tee parandamine Kohaliku tee parandamine Kohaliku tee parandamine Kohaliku tee parandamine Veevärgi paigaldamine Veevärgi paigaldamine Veevärgi süsteemi ehitus Kohalike teede parandamine Kohalike teede parandamine Kohalike teede parandamine Laiendatud veevärgi süsteemi ehitus Kohapealne Vahetu test (2) külastus (1) v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v Vastavustest (3) v v v v v v v v 33 (1) Kohapealne külastus lõpliku abisaajaga kohtumiseks ja projekti kontrollimiseks.
TOTAL 76 24 24 28 
KOKKU 76 24 24 28 42 75
30.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 295/23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I.-II. The Commission welcomes the audit carried out on the implementation of the Sapard instrument. The Commission considers, however, that a final analysis concerning the impact of the programme can be made only when it has been fully implemented. 
30.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 295/23 KOMISJONI VASTUSED KOMMENTEERITUD KOKKUVÕTE I.–II. Komisjon kiidab heaks SAPARDi vahendite rakendamise kohta tehtud auditi. Komisjon on siiski seisukohal, et lõplikult saab programmi mõju analüüsida alles siis, kui see on täielikult ellu rakendatud.
While the main elements of the CommissionŐs proposal on the Sapard Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 were maintained, the text of the proposal was subject to ongoing discussions (as regards the budget headings under which the pre-accession instruments should be financed, including the financial implementing mechanisms) until the final stage of its adoption. 
Kuigi komisjoni ettepanekus SAPARDi määruse nr 1268/1999 kohta esitatud põhielemendid on jäänud samaks, oli ettepaneku tekst kuni SAPARDi määruse lõpliku vastuvõtmiseni pideva arutelu teemaks (eelarve pealkirjade osas, mille kohaselt liitumiseel-sete vahendite finantseerimisse tuleks kaasata ka finantsrakendus-mehhanisme).
As long as the legal uncertainty remained, the Commission was not in a position to draw up the final legal provisions for the implementing arrangements. 
Kuni säilis õiguskindlusetus, polnud komisjonil võimalik koostada lõplikke õigusnorme rakendusmeetmete kohta.
These provisions were adopted by the Commission on 26 January 2000. 
Komisjon võttis need normid vastu 26. jaanuaril 2000. aastal.
The approach was new and this was the first time external aid was managed on a fully decentralised basis. 
Lähenemine oli uus ja esmakordselt hallati välisabi täiesti detsentraliseeritult.
One main objective of Sapard is to contribute to the implementation of the acquis. 
SAPARDi üheks põhieesmärgiks on aidata kaasa acquis’ rakendamisele.
An essential part of this is to assure a good administrative capacity able to perform the demanding tasks of rural development policy implementation according to the principles of sound financial management. 
Selle oluliseks osaks on hea haldussuutlikkuse kindlustamine, mis võimaldab lahendada raskeid probleeme maaelu arendamise poliitika elluviimisel kooskõlas usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise põhimõtetega.
This is also in line with the demand of the European Parliament, expressed in the European Parliament resolution accompanying the 1999 discharge, that Ôeffective protection of the CommunityŐs financial interest in the applicant countries should be an absolute priority in the next few yearsŐ. 
See on kooskõlas ka Euroopa Parlamendi nõudmisega, mis on lisatud Euroopa Parlamendi 1999. aasta avaldusega kaasnevasse resolutsiooni ning milles väidetakse, et “ühenduse finantshuvide tõhus kaitsmine kandidaatriikides peab järgmisel paaril aastal olema absoluutseks prioriteediks”.
The Commission is of the opinion that it has provided sufficient guidance and advice to the Sapard countries and has worked with them to prepare the setting up of the institutions and procedures. 
Komisjon on seisukohal, et SAPARDi riikidele on antud piisavalt suuniseid ja nõu ning komisjon on teinud institutsioonide ja protseduuride korralduse osas nendega koostööd.
This has been done both through extensive assistance of experts from Member States through Phare twinning arrangements, and through ongoing exchange of information in the framework of seminars and fact-finding missions (see the CommissionŐs Sapard Annual Report for 2000). 
Seda on tehtud nii liikmesriikide ekspertide abil PHARE twinning-programmide raames kui ka läbi pideva teabevahetuse seminaridel ja teabekogu-miskülastustel. (Vt komisjoni 2000. aasta SAPARDi aastaaruannet).
The Sapard budgets for 2000-2004 were drawn up on the basis of the most reliable information available at that time. 
SAPARDi eelarved aastateks 2000–2004 koostati kõige usaldusväärsema vastaval ajahetkel kättesaadava teabe põhjal.
The sizeable challenges posed by the need to set up an entirely new system and the lack of experience of the Sapard countries in this area meant that implementation took time, but in most cases no longer than could be reasonably expected, given experience from similar exercises in the Member States. 
Suur väljakutse, mis lähtus vajadusest luua täiesti uus süsteem, ja SAPARDi riikide kogenematus selles valdkonnas viitas asjaolule, et rakendamine nõuab aega, kuid enamikul juhtudel mitte rohkem, kui võis põhjendatult eeldada, võttes aluseks samalaadse töö kogemuse liikmesriikides.
The Commission is well aware of the reasons why it took longer in some countries to set up the administrative system for implementing Sapard. 
Komisjon on täiesti teadlik põhjustest, mille tõttu kulus mõnedes riikides SAPARDi rakendamiseks vajaliku haldussüsteemi loomiseks rohkem aega.
Whenever it was made aware of Ôheavy administrative proceduresŐ, the Commission advised the countries concerned by correspondence, during bilateral meetings and at the Monitoring Committee meetings. 
“Keeruliste haldusprotseduuride” ilmnemisel nõustas komisjon asjaomaseid riike kirjavahetuse teel, kahepoolsetel kohtumistel ja seirekomitee koosolekutel.
However, the exact procedural choice remains with the countries concerned. 
Täpne protseduurivalik jääb siiski asjaomase riigi pädevusse.
The Commission cannot prevent them from applying their own internal administrative arrangements as long as the Sapard rules are respected. 
Komisjon ei saa takistada neid oma siseriiklike halduskokkulepete rakendamisel seni, kuni peetakse kinni SAPARDi reeglitest.
The CommissionŐs responsibility under a system of decentralised management is to monitor the implementation of Sapard. 
Detsentraliseeritud juhtimissüsteemi kohaselt on komisjoni ülesanne jälgida SAPARDi rakendamist.
As current events show money is flowing now at a regular pace in almost all Sapard countries, based on a reliable system which can be used as a basis for the programmes as Member States. 
Praegused sündmused näitavad raha liikumise korrapärasust peaaegu kõikides usaldusväärsel süsteemil põhinevates SAPARDi riikides, mille saab võtta aluseks ka liikmesriikide programmide juhtimisel.
V. Payments made to final beneficiaries alone in 2003 amounted to EUR 288 million. 
V. Ainuüksi 2003. aastal moodustasid meetme sihtgrupile tehtud väljamaksed 280 miljonit eurot.
By 31 December 2003, against the 2000-2003 allocation of EUR 2 183 million, total commitments to final beneficiaries amounted to EUR 1 214 million (56 %) while actual payments made to the beneficiaries totalled EUR 323 million (15 % of allocation). 
Arvestades 2000–2003 aasta eraldist summas 2 183 miljonit, ulatus 31. detsembriks 2003 kogukohustus meetme sihtgrupi suhtes 1 214 miljoni euroni (56 %), kuna aga sihtgrupile tehtud tegelikud väljamaksed moodustasid kokku 323 miljonit eurot (15% eraldisest).
According to information received from the Sapard countries, at least seven out of eight countries due to join the EU will be able to contract all the available funds for the 2000-2003 period to final beneficiaries. 
SAPARDi riikidest saadud teabe põhjal suudavad vähemalt seitse kaheksast ELiga liituvast riigist sõlmida vahemikus 2000–2003 sihtgrupiga lepingud kõigi võimalike fondide kasutamiseks.
The rule on the eligibility of VAT for EU part-financing applies to the Sapard countries as well as to the Member States receiving support under the Structural Funds. 
Käibemaksu abikõlblikkuse reegel ELi kaasfinantseerimise puhul kehtib nii SAPARDi riikides kui ka struktuurifondidest toetusi saavates liikmesriikides.
Multi-annual Financing Agreement (MAFA) rules apply. 
Kohaldatakse mitmeaastase rahastamislepingu (MAFA) reegleid.
The Commission considers that increasing production capacity at project level is compatible with improving standards and the need for restructuring to improve market efficiency. 
Komisjoni hinnangul on tootmisvõimsuse tõstmine projekti tasemel kooskõlas paranevate standarditega ja ümberkorralduste tegemise vajadusega turuefektiivsuse parandamiseks.
The Commission considers institution building as one of the fundamental elements of the acquis and a pre-condition for the responsible use of EU funds. 
Komisjoni hinnangul on institutsioonide loomine üheks acquis’ põhielemendiks ja ELi fondide vastutustundliku kasutamise eeltingimuseks.
The agri-environment measure was a facility for the Sapard countries to gain administrative experience through pilot actions and was not one of the most important measures needed to restructure the agricultural sector and prepare for accession. 
Põllumajanduse keskkonnapoliitika meede oli SAPARDi riikidele vahendiks, mille abil omandada katsemeet-mete raames halduskogemusi, mitte aga olulisim põllumajandussektori ümberkorraldamise ja liitumiseks valmistumise vahend.
The Commission welcomes the CourtŐs assessment that the Sapard system generally works in practice. 
Komisjon kiidab heaks kohtu hinnangu, et üldiselt on SAPARDi süsteem tegelikkuses toimiv.
The Commission recognises that there have been some problems with the controls on compliance with minimum standards and has made recommendations for improvements. 
Komisjon tunnistab, et on olnud mõningaid probleeme miinimumnõuetele vastavuse kontrollimisega, ja on andnud soovitusi paranduste tegemiseks.
On the basis of its audits up to March 2004, the Commission considers that the situation has improved since the CourtŐs audit. 
Kuni 2004. aasta märtsini tehtud auditite põhjal on komisjon seisukohal, et pärast kohtu auditit on olukord paranenud.
X. The Commission is aware of the problem of lack of own resources and of the difficulties in obtaining credit. 
X. Komisjon teadvustab omavahendite puudumise probleemi ja raskusi krediidi saamisel.
To address this issue, the Commission, with the aid of Phare funds, is supporting a project to improve access to credit for SMEs in Sapard countries, which should help widen access to Sapard. This project THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES 
Selle küsimuse lahendamiseks toetab komisjon PHARE fondide abil SAPARDi riikide väikeste ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtete krediidivõimaluste parandamise
C 295/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2004 has recently been extended with a specific sub-window focusing on credit institutions serving farmers and small rural businesses. 
C 295/24 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 30.11.2004 projekti. Hiljuti laiendati nimetatud projekti eraldi alljaotusega, mis keskendub talunikke ja väikesi maaettevõtteid teenindavatele krediidiasutustele.
It also encourages the candidate countries to use national credit schemes as far as they are respecting Community competition rules and aid intensities of the Sapard Regulation. 
Samuti julgustab see kandidaatriike kasutama siseriiklikke krediidiskeeme, kuni nad peavad kinni ühenduse konkurentsireeglitest ja tunnistavad SAPARDi määruse abi osatähtsust.
In order to facilitate the application of national credit schemes the Commission in its recent proposal for a modification of Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 included a specific provision in this respect (see also reply to point 97). 
Siseriiklike krediidikavade rakendamise hõlbustamiseks on komisjon oma hiljutisse ettepanekusse määruse nr 1268/1999 muutmise kohta kaasanud seda käsitleva erisätte (vt ka vastust punktile 97).
Although the Commission has also identified weaknesses in some cases and has made recommendations for improvements, it considers that the situation has improved since the CourtŐs audit. 
Kuigi mõnel juhul on komisjon avastanud nõrkusi ja andnud soovitusi parandusteks, on ta seisukohal, et olukord on kohtu auditi tegemise ajast paranenud.
Where necessary, these recommendations will be followed up under the clearance of accounts procedures. 
Vajadusel jälgitakse nimetatud soovitusi raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise käigus.
While the main elements of the CommissionŐs proposal on the Sapard Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 were maintained, the text of the proposal was subject to ongoing discussions (including discussions on budget headings) until the final stage of adoption of the Sapard Regulation. 
While the main elements of the Commission’s proposal on the Sapard Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 were maintained, the text of the proposal was subject to ongoing discussions (including discussions on budget headings) until the final stage of adoption of the Sapard Regulation.
The detailed steps and the time required for elaborating and agreeing the financial implementing arrangements are outlined in the CommissionŐs Sapard Annual Report 2000. 
The detailed steps and the time required for elaborating and agreeing the financial implementing arrangements are outlined in the Commission’s Sapard Annual Report 2000.
Although the Romanian Sapard Agency has committed a large amount, the Commission is closely monitoring the situation (because of the low uptake in terms of payments) and providing advice as appropriate to reduce bottlenecks and risks in the procedures. 
Although the Romanian Sapard Agency has committed a large amount, the Commission is closely monitoring the situation (because of the low uptake in terms of payments) and providing advice as appropriate to reduce bott-lenecks and risks in the procedures.
For example, the Commission urged the Polish authorities to Ôreview the elements of Polish legislation which could slow down a smooth implementation of the programmeŐ. 
For example, the Commission urged the Polish authorities to ‘review the elements of Polish legislation which could slow down a smooth implementation of the programme’.
30.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 295/25 Notwithstanding the stricter national provisions for contracting and payments, Poland expects to commit all available funds for 2000-2003 to final beneficiaries. 
30.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 295/25 Notwithstanding the stricter national provisions for contracting and payments, Poland expects to commit all available funds for 2000-2003 to final beneficiaries.
The most experienced staff member of the CommissionŐs Sapard unit, together with the Deputy Head of Unit, monitored the Bulgaria and Romania Sapard programmes until the end of 2003. 
The most experienced staff member of the Commission’s Sapard unit, together with the Deputy Head of Unit, monitored the Bulgaria and Romania Sapard programmes until the end of 2003.
The Commission could not give a Ôcommitment to speed up implementationŐ due to the reasons the Court rightly cites. 
The Commission could not give a ‘commitment to speed up implementation’ due to the reasons the Court rightly cites.
All viable proposals were accepted via modifications to the MAFA or via changes in the relevant Regulations. 
All viable proposals were accepted via modifications to the MAFA or via changes in the relevant Regulations.
These actions have been described in detail in the CommissionŐs Sapard 2000 to 2002 annual reports. 
These actions have been described in detail in the Commission’s Sapard 2000 to 2002 annual reports.