natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5 Declaration of the Conference on the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Initiative and the African Water Facility, Marseille, 14 March 2012 (http://www.afdb.org/fihttp:// www.afdb.org/fileadmin/ uploads/afdb/Documents/ Generic-Documents/RWSSI-AWF%20Conference%20 Declaration%20Final%20 14%20Mar%202012.pdf ). 
5 Maapiirkondade veevarustuse ja sanitaartingimuste ning Aafrika veerahastu konverentsi deklaratsioon, Marseille, 14. märts 2012 (http://www.afdb.org/ fileadmin/uploads/afdb/ Documents/Generic-Documents/RWSSI- AWF%20Conference%20 Declaration%20Final%20 14%20Mar%202012.pdf ).
6 COM(2002) 132 final of 12 March 2002 — Water management in developing countries: Policy and priorities for EU development cooperation. 
6 KOM(2002) 132 (lõplik), 12. märts 2002:„Veemajandus arengumaades: ELi arengukoostööpoliitika ja prioriteedid”.
7 Council document 9696/02. 
7 Nõukogu dokument 9696/02.
8 Paragraphs 80 and 81 of the European Consensus on Development (OJ C 46, 24.2.2006): water (together with energy) is included amongst the nine priority areas for EU development policy. 
8 Euroopa konsensus arengu küsimuses (ELT C 46, 24.2.2006), punktid 80 ja 81: vesi (koos energiaga) kuulub ELi arengupoliitika üheksa prioriteetse valdkonna hulka.
8 Special Report No 13/2012 – European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in sub-Saharan countries 
8 Eriaruanne nr 13/2012 – Euroopa Liidu arenguabi Sahara-taguse Aafrika joogiveega varustamisele ja sanitaarvaldkonnale
Stemming from the communication, at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg the EU launched a Water Initiative (EUWI) designed to help achieve the MDGs for drinking water and sanitation (see Box 1). 
Teatise alusel tegi EL 2002. aasta maailma säästva arengu tippkohtumisel Johannesburgis teatavaks oma veealgatuse, mille eesmärk oli kaasa aidata vee ja sanitaartingimuste alaste aastatuhande arengueesmärkide saavutamisele (vt 1. selgitus).
FINANCING 11. 
RAHASTAMINE 11.
The EU channels funds for water and sanitation through both thematic and geographical (national and regional) programmes9. 
EL rahastab vee-ja sanitaarvaldkonnale antavat abi nii valdkondlike kui ka geograafiliste (riigi ja piirkondliku tasandi) programmide kaudu9.
Furthermore, the EU provides funds in the context of humanitarian aid operations. 
Samuti rahastab EL antud valdkonda oma humanitaarabitegevuse raames.
The Commission’s external actions information system, the Common Relex Information System (CRIS), shows that expenditure on water and sanitation in sub-Saharan countries between 2001 and 2010 was 1 010 million euro (see Annex I). 
Komisjoni arenguabiprogrammide teabesüsteemi (CRIS) kohaselt oli perioodil 2001–2010 Sahara-taguses Aafrikas vee ja sanitaarvaldkonnas tehtud kulutuste mahuks 1,01 miljardit eurot (vt I lisa).
However, since funding for water and sanitation also features in other sectors of assistance, such as rural development, agriculture, environment, health and education, the total amount of the support provided by the Commission will have been higher. 
Kuna aga vee ja sanitaarvaldkonda rahastatakse ka teiste abivaldkondade eelarvest (nt maaelu areng, põllumajandus, keskkond, tervis ja haridus), siis on komisjoni tegelik abisumma eelpool mainitust suurem.
9 European Development Funds (EDF) for the ACP countries and, for the 2007–2013 financial framework, the Development Cooperation Instrument for Asia and Latin America and the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument for neighbourhood countries. 
9 Euroopa Arengufondid AKV riikides ning finantsraamistiku 2007– 2013 puhul Aasia ja Ladina-Ameerika riikide arengukoostöö rahastamisvahend ning naaberriikides Euroopa naabrus-ja partnerlusinstrument.
9 BOX 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE EU WATER INITIATIVE The EUWI aims to: — reinforce political commitment to action and raising the profile of water and sanitation issues in the context of poverty reduction efforts; — promote better water governance arrangements (through strengthening institutional capacity and public–private partnerships); — improve coordination and cooperation in the implementation of water and sanitation-related interventions; — encourage regional and subregional cooperation in the framework of integrated water resource management; and — catalyse additional funding. 
9 1. SELGITUS ELi VEEALGATUSE EESMÄRGID Veealgatusel on järgmised eesmärgid: — poliitilise tegutsemiskohustuse tugevdamine ja vaesuse vähendamiseks tehtavate pingutuste kontekstis vee-ja sanitaarküsimuste esiletõstmine; — veevarude parema haldamise edendamine (tugevdades haldussuutlikkust ning edendades avaliku ja erasektori partnerlusi); — koordineerimise ja koostöö parandamine vee ja sanitaarvaldkonna abi rakendamisel; — veeressursside integreeritud haldamise raames piirkondliku ja allpiirkondliku koostöö julgustamine — täiendava rahastamise ligimeelitamine.
10 AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 13. 
10 AUDITI LÄHENEMISVIIS JA ULATUS 13.
It focused on the following two questions: (a) Were the planned results of the projects financed by the EU achieved, and are they sustainable? (b) Did the Commission take appropriate steps to ensure sustainable results in water supply and sanitation? 
Auditis keskenduti kahele küsimusele. a) Kas ELi rahastatud projektide kavandatud tulemused saavutati ja kas need on püsivad? b) Kas komisjon võttis asjakohaseid samme selleks, et tagada vee ja sanitaarvaldkonnas osutatud arenguabi püsivad tulemused?
The audit considered whether projects met the technical, financial and institutional conditions necessary for them to be sustainable. 
Auditiga uuriti, kas projektide juures olid täidetud tehnilised, rahalised ja halduslikud tingimused, mis olid vajalikud nende jätkusuutlikkuse tagamiseks.
To the extent possible, consideration was also given to whether the projects also had social and environmental impacts10. 
Võimaluste piires uuriti ka seda, kas projektid avaldasid sotsiaalset ja keskkonnamõju10.
The audit work was carried out between February and December 2011. 
Auditeeriti ajavahemikus veebruar–detsember 2011.
It included detailed examination of EU-funded water and sanitation projects in six beneficiary countries: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Nigeria and Tanzania (see Annex II). 
Töö sisaldas ELi rahastatud vee ja sanitaarvaldkonna projektide üksikasjalikku kontrollimist kuues riigis: Angolas, Beninis, Burkina Fasos, Ghanas, Nigeerias ja Tansaanias (vt II lisa).
Visits to Burkina Faso, Nigeria and Tanzania were carried out between April and July 2011. 
Kontrollkäigud Burkina Fasosse, Nigeeriasse ja Tansaaniasse tehti vahemikus aprill–juuli 2011.
The total cost of these contracts was over 400 million euro, 49 % of which was funded by the EU. 
Lepingute kogumaht oli enam kui 400 miljonit eurot, millest 49% rahastas EL.
Annex III provides a list of all projects and programmes selected for the audit. 
Kõik auditi jaoks valitud projektid ja programmid on loetletud III lisas.
10 In line with the Commission position as expressed in COM(2002) 132 final, ‘The strategic approach for sustainable access to and management of water resources integrates sectoral and cross-cutting issues and encompasses all aspects of sustainability. 
10 Kooskõlas komisjoni dokumendis KOM(2002) 132 (lõplik) esitatud seisukohaga „sisaldab strateegiline lähenemine veevarude jätkusuutlikuks hõlvamiseks ja haldamiseks valdkondlikke ja valdkondadevahelisi küsimusi ning hõlmab jätkusuutlikkuse kõiki aspekte.
Economic, social and environmental sustainability ...’. 
Majanduslik, sotsiaalne ja keskkonnaalane jätkusuutlikkus ...”.
The Court’s visits and analyses of reports showed that appropriate equipment for water supply had been installed for all the projects. 
Kontrollikoja auditikäigud ja aruannete analüüs näitasid, et kõigi projektide puhul olid paigaldatud asjakohased seadmed.
In some cases the original plans were adjusted in terms of quantity, technical specifications, location and timing in order to meet the local conditions encountered during implementation (see Annex IV and Box 2). 
Mõnel juhul oli algseid plaane projektide elluviimise käigus kohandatud: kohalikest oludest tulenevalt muudeti koguseid, tehnilisi kirjeldusi, asukohta ja ajakava (vt IV lisa ja 2. selgitus).
Standpipe in a school in Kilolo - Tanzania © European Court of Auditors 18. 
Püsttoru ühes Kilolo koolis – Tansaania © Euroopa Kontrollikoda. 18.
At the time of the audit, information was available (either from EU delegations or as a result of inspection by the Court’s auditors) about the current operation of: — water-supply equipment in 18 of the 23 projects; — sanitation facilities in 10 of the 17 projects with a sanitation component. Special Report No 13/2012 – European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in sub-Saharan countries 
Auditi tegemise ajal omas kontrollikoda (kas ELi delegatsioonidelt saadud või kontrollikoja audiitorite tehtud auditikäikudel kogutud) teavet järgmiste projektide hetkeseisukorra kohta: — 18 veevarustusseadmeid sisaldavat projekti 23st; — sanitaarsõlmed kümne sanitaarolude parandamist sisaldava projekti puhul 17st. Eriaruanne nr 13/2012 – Euroopa Liidu arenguabi Sahara-taguse Aafrika joogiveega varustamisele ja sanitaarvaldkonnale
12 BOX 2 ‘CLOSING THE GAP’: IMPROVING WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROVISION FOR SMALL TOWNS IN NIGERIA The ‘Closing the gap’ project contributed to the provision of clean water and sanitation in 12 small towns of the state of Jigawa, in the north of Nigeria. 
2. SELGITUS 12 EBAVÕRDSUSE VÄHENDAMINE: VEEVARUSTUSE JA SANITAARTINGIMUSTE PARANDAMINE NIGEERIA VÄIKELINNADES Projekt „Ebavõrdsuse vähendamine” (Closing the gap) aitas kaasa puhta veega varustamise ja sanitaartingimuste parandamisele Nigeeria põhjaosa Jigava osariigi 12 väikelinnas.
The project financed the construction of simple water-supply systems (boreholes and a water network) which were in good condition and functioning correctly at the time of the auditors’ visit (July 2011). 
Projekti raames rahastati lihtsate veevarustussüsteemide (puuraugud ja veetorustik) rajamist. Taristu oli audiitorite kontrollkäigu ajal (2011. aasta juulis) heas seisukorras ning toimis korralikult.
In addition, household latrines were built using locally available materials. 
Lisaks ehitati majapidamistele kohalikest materjalidest kuivkäimlaid.
The project did more than provide infrastructure. 
Projektiga saavutati enamat kui taristu rajamine.
By helping local communities identify for themselves what they needed from the project, it aimed to make long-lasting changes in behaviour. 
Kohalikul kogukonnal aidati otsustada, mida nad projektilt ootavad, ning seeläbi püüti inimeste käitumist pikaajaliselt muuta.
Water consumer associations participated in the discussions on the technical specifications of the water-supply and sanitation systems, taking into account the needs of the customers, and were in charge of the day-to-day operation of the systems. 
Veetarbijate ühendused osalesid veevarustuse ja sanitaarsüsteemide tehnilisi kirjeldusi puudutavates aruteludes (arvesse võeti klientide vajadusi) ning tegele-Veekraanid Jigawas – Nigeeria © Euroopa Kontrollikoda.
They received support from the water and sanitation state agency when maintenance and repairs were needed. 
Vajalike hooldus-ja remonditööde korral toetas neid riiklik vee-ja sanitaaramet.
Water kiosk, Jigawa - Nigeria © European Court of Auditors The project has had positive effects on the lives of local communities. 
Projekt on avaldanud kohalikele kogukondadele positiivset mõju.
The small towns were visibly free from the problem of open defecation and there has been a decrease in water-borne illnesses. 
Väikelinnad vabanesid avalikus kohas roojamise probleemist ning vähenenud on ka veega levivate nakkushaiguste esinemine.
At the time of the audit, the project was replicated in over 100 small towns. 
Auditi tegemise ajal teostati analoogsed projektid enam kui 100 väikelinnas.
‘CROSS RIVER STATE RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION’, NIGERIA The beneficiary of the grant submitted an ‘Interim narrative report’ on 7 June 2011. 
NIGEERIA CROSS RIVERI OSARIIGI VEEVARUSTUS-JA SANITAARPROJEKT 2011. aasta 7. juunil esitas abisaaja esialgse aruande, mis hõlmas kogu projekti rakendusperioodi (1. jaanuar 2005 – 31. detsember 2010).
According to the interim narrative report, the main outputs of the project had been implemented as provided by the project proposal and the grant agreement, with two main exceptions, namely, (a) the reduction of the number of boreholes that had been repaired to 61 (against 120 in the agreement) and (b) the abandoning of the construction of sanitation centres and latrines. 
Aruande kohaselt vastas projekti elluviimine enamjaolt projektiettepanekule ja toetuslepingule. Kaks erandit siiski tehti: a) remonditud puuraukude arvu vähendati 61ni (lepingu kohaselt pidi neid olema 120) ning b) sanitaarkeskused ja kuivkäimlad jäeti ehitamata.
In order to compensate for the reduction of the number of repaired boreholes, the grant beneficiary constructed 15 additional new boreholes. 
Remon-ditud puuraukude väiksemat arvu kompenseeriti 15 täiendava uue puuraugu rajamisega.
In 10 out of the 18 projects for which information was available, the water-supply equipment installed was maintained in clean and good condition and was operating. 
18 projektist kümne puhul, mille kohta andmed olid olemas, olid paigaldatud veevarustusseadmed puhtad ja heas korras ning töötasid.
Seven projects suffered from minor weaknesses affecting part of the project while for one serious weaknesses were noted (see Box 3). 
Seitsme projekti puhul täheldati mõningaid puudusi, mis projekti osaliselt mõju-tasid, ning ühe projekti puhul leiti tõsiseid puudusi (vt 3. selgitus).
Out of the 10 projects with a sanitation component for which information is available, five were successful, in two cases the facilities constructed were not in operation or in adequate working order, and in three other cases there were minor weaknesses (see Annex IV). 
Sanitaartingimuste parandamist sisaldanud kümnest projektist (mille kohta teave olemas oli) olid edukad viis, kahel juhul ei olnud seadmed kasutuses või asjakohases töökorras ning kolmel juhul täheldati väiksemat laadi puudusi (vt IV lisa).
13 Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Programme - Nigeria © European Court of Auditors BOX 3 ‘RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION IN THE NORTHERN REGION’, GHANA According to the project's final evaluation report, hand pumps were sited in areas known to be prone to regular flooding, susceptible to contamination and periodically inaccessible. 
13 Väikelinnade veevarustuse ja sanitaartingimuste programm – Nigeeria © Euroopa Kontrollikoda. 3. SELGITUS GHANA PÕHJAOSA MAAPIIRKONDADE VEEVARUSTUS JA SANITAARTINGIMUSED Projekti lõpliku hindamisaruande kohaselt paigaldati käsipumbad piirkondadesse, kus esineb tihti üleujutusi, mis muudavad need perioodiliselt ligipääsmatuks ning millega kaasneb saasteoht.
As regards the boreholes rehabilitated in East Gonja and West Mamprusi, the following problems were reported by a verification mission carried out in 2010: ο in East Gonja, out of 17 boreholes inspected, five were not functioning and three were not in use, and ο in West Mamprusi district, out of seven boreholes inspected, one was not functioning. 
Ida-Gonja ja Lääne-Mamprusi remonditud puuraukude juures avastati 2010. aastal tehtud kontrollkäigu ajal järgmised probleemid: ο Ida-Gonjas kontrollitud 17 puuraugust viis ei olnud töökorras ning kolm ei olnud kasutuses; ο Lääne-Mamprusis kontrollitud seitsmest puuraugust üks ei olnud töökorras.
Following a first visit carried out in 2009, it had been reported that, out of seven boreholes selected for inspection in the two districts, one had not been found and three were in bad working condition. 
Peale 2009. aastal tehtud esimest kontrollkäiku teatati, et kõnealuses kahes piirkonnas kontrollitud seitsmest puuraugust ühte ei leitud ning kolm olid halvas töökorras.
In addition, out of the 40 boreholes inspected in the West Gonja district in the context of the project’s technical and financial audits conducted in 2009, three were not functioning. Special Report No 13/2012 – European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in sub-Saharan countries 
Lisaks ei olnud kasutuses kolm puurauku 40st, mida kontrolliti Lääne-Gonja piirkonnas 2009. aastal tehtud projekti tehnilise ja finantsauditi raames Eriaruanne nr 13/2012 – Euroopa Liidu arenguabi Sahara-taguse Aafrika joogiveega varustamisele ja sanitaarvaldkonnale
The needs of beneficiaries as defined in the projects were clearly met in only two of the 23 projects audited, and met with minor weaknesses in a further six cases. 
Auditeeritud 23 projektist vastasid abisaajate projektides määratletud vajadustele selgelt vaid kaks, väikeste puudustega vastasid vajadustele veel kuus projekti.
In other cases there were more serious weaknesses (see Annex IV and Box 4). 
Ülejäänud juhtudel täheldati tõsisemaid puudusi (vt IV lisa ja 4. selgitus).
With two exceptions, the entities running the facilities did not carry out regular checks to ensure that the water quality meets the minimum standards required for human consumption (see Box 5). 
Kui kaks erandit välja arvata, siis ei kontrollinud veeseadmeid käitavad üksused regulaarselt vee kvaliteeti, et tagada vee vastavus inimtarbimiseks mõeldud veele seatud minimaalsetele kvaliteedinõuetele (vt 5. selgitus).
Difficulty in organising regular tests and the risk of contamination11 were among the most common obstacles to achieving these standards. 
Kvaliteedinõuetele vastamist takistasid tavaliselt probleemid regulaarsete analüüside tegemisel ning saastatuse oht11.
Therefore, the populations served are often strongly advised to boil the water before using it for drinking or cooking. 
Seetõttu soovitatakse tarbijatel tihti tungivalt vett enne joomist või söögitegemist keeta.
The Court assessed the technical, financial and institutional sustainability of the projects audited and, where possible, their social and environmental impact, by analysing technical documents and inspecting projects (see paragraph 14 and Annex IV). 
Kontrollikoda hindas auditeeritud projektide tehnilist, rahalist ja halduslikku jätkusuutlikkust ning võimaluse korral ka nende ühiskondlikku ja keskkonnamõju. Selleks analüüsiti tehnilisi dokumente ja kontrolliti projekte kohapeal (vt punkt 14 ja IV lisa).
11 Old water distribution pipelines and insufficiently protected water sources are among the factors that more significantly contribute to contamination of the water supplied. 
11 Kõige levinumad vee saastumise põhjused on vanad veetorud ja ebapiisavalt kaitstud veeallikad.
Even where facilities are new, if piped distribution systems are not used the processes of transport and house storage of water add to the risk of its contamination. 
Isegi juhul, kui tegemist on uute süsteemidega, ent vee transpordiks ei kasutata torustikke, suurendavad transport ja kodune hoiustamine vee saastumise ohtu.
14 Special Report No 13/2012 – European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in sub-Saharan countries 
14 Eriaruanne nr 13/2012 – Euroopa Liidu arenguabi Sahara-taguse Aafrika joogiveega varustamisele ja sanitaarvaldkonnale
15 BOX 4 ‘SMALL TOWNS WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROGRAMME (STWSSP)’, NIGERIA The programme included construction of boreholes, pumps and distribution networks in 24 small towns in Adamawa, Delta and Ekiti states. 
15 4. SELGITUS NIGEERIA VÄIKELINNADE VEEVARUSTUSE JA SANITAARTINGIMUSTE PROGRAMM Programm sisaldas puuraukude, pumpade ja veetorustike rajamist Adamawa, Delta ja Ekiti osariigi 24 väikelinnas.
The plans had relied on the electricity grid to power the pumps, but in the event this supply is almost non-existent. 
Plaanid põhinesid eeldusel, et pumpade käitamiseks on olemas elektrivõrk, mis tegelikkuses aga peaaegu täielikult puudus.
Although standby generators were installed, sufficient diesel to run them on a routine basis is too expensive. 
Paigaldati küll tagavarageneraatorid, ent küllaldase koguse diislikütuse ostmine pumpade pidevaks käitamiseks on liiga kallis.
Potential users therefore continued to use their previous sources of water, and the programme aimed at providing a reliable improved source of drinking water had delivered practically no benefits. 
Sellest tulenevalt jätkasid potentsiaalsed kasutajad oma varasemate veeallikate kasutamist ning usaldusväärse parandatud kvaliteediga joogivee tagamiseks mõeldud programmist ei olnud praktiliselt mingit kasu.
‘WATER SUPPLY PROGRAMME REGIONAL CENTRES PHASE I’, TANZANIA In Mwanza, the construction of the waste water treatment plant originally planned was postponed to Phase II, albeit the implementation of the water-supply component of the project was already completed. 
TANSAANIA PIIRKONDLIKE KESKUSTE VEEVARUSTUSE PROGRAMMI 1. ETAPP Mwanzas algselt kavandatud reoveepuhasti ehitamine lükati edasi 2. etappi, kuigi projekti veevarustust hõlmav osa oli juba lõpetatud.
BOX 5 WATER QUALITY IN ANGOLA AND TANZANIA In the city of Tombwa, Angola, the entity in charge of the management of the water supply system declared that water analyses were carried out daily; however, no records of these analyses were provided to the auditors. 
5. SELGITUS VEE KVALITEET ANGOLAS JA TANSAANIAS Tombwa linnas Angolas kinnitas veevarustusega tegelev ettevõte, et analüüse tehti iga päev.
Water provided to the suburban areas of Luanda was chemically treated in the water treatment plant before distribution, and according to the reports it met the criteria suggested by WHO guidelines. 
Luanda eeslinnade vett töödeldi keemiliselt enne selle jaotussüsteemi pumpamist ning dokumentide kohaselt vastas vee kvaliteet WHO soovituslike juhendite kriteeriumidele.
However, the water network was subject to frequent breakages which increased the possibility of water contamination during distribution to the users. 
Veevõrgustikus esines aga tihti torude puru-nemist, mis suurendas tõenäosust, et vesi võis torustikus teel tarbijateni saastuda.
In the rural areas, for the project to supply 10 villages of the northern province of Uige no water analyses were carried out due to logistical difficulties in reaching the water catchment area. 
Maapiirkondades, kus põhjapoolses Uige provintsis teostatud projekti käigus rajati kümne küla veevarustus, ei tehtud veeanalüüse, kuna veehaardeni jõudmine oli logistiliselt keeruline.
In Tanzania, the rural project to supply water to villages in Njombe could count on support from the local laboratory for water analysis, although quality tests were carried out irregularly. 
Tansaanias Njombes maapiirkondade külade veevarustuse projektis oli veeanalüüside tegemisel abiks kohalik labor, ehkki kvaliteedianalüüse tehti ebaregulaarselt.
However, local farmers had recently planted barley near the water catchment area, using chemical fertilisers and pesticides. 
Kohalikud põllumehed olid aga veehaarde lähedale hiljuti otra külvanud ning kasutasid selle kasvatamisel keemilisi väetisi ja pestitsiide.
The local laboratory was not equipped for detecting these kinds of contamination and the water samples had to be sent to the capital, which implied long waiting periods for the results of the analysis to be known and increased costs. Special Report No 13/2012 – European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in sub-Saharan countries 
Kohalikul laboril puudusid seadmed sedalaadi saaste avastamiseks ning veeproovid tuli saata pealinna, millega kaasnesid pikad ooteajad proovitulemuste saamisel ja suuremad kulud. Eriaruanne nr 13/2012 – Euroopa Liidu arenguabi Sahara-taguse Aafrika joogiveega varustamisele ja sanitaarvaldkonnale
TECHNICAL SUSTAINABILITY 25. 
TEHNILINE JÄTKUSUUTLIKKUS 25.
Overall the projects audited promoted the use of standard technology and locally available materials for both water-supply and sanitation components. 
Üldiselt kasutati auditeeritud projektide puhul standardset tehnoloogiat ning kohalikke materjale nii veevarustuse kui ka sanitaartingimuste parandamisega tegelevate projektide puhul.