natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
67. the commission refers to its reply to paragraph 66. 
67. Komisjon viitab punktile 66 antud vastusele.
67. (a) for the 2007–13 period, working document no 4 makes clear that charging policy should take into account the projects normal profitability and the need to cover operational costs while ensuring affordability (i.e. the impact of tariffs on users’ income). 
67. a) Programmiperioodi 2007–2013 kohta antakse töödokumendis nr 4 selgelt mõista, et hinnapoliitika peaks võtma arvesse projektide normaalset kasumlikkust ja vajadust katta tegevuskulud ning samas tagada taskukohasus (s.o hindade mõju kasutajate sissetulekutele).
68–69. see reply to paragraph 9. 
68.-69. vt vastus punktile 9.
57 conclusIons and rEcommEndatIons 71. the commission welcomes the court’s conclusion that structural measures’ spending has contributed to improving supply of water for domestic use. 
Komisjon nõustub kontrollikoja järeldusega, et struktuurimeetmete toetus on aidanud kaasa kodumajapidamiste veega varustamise parandamisele.
72. (a) there has been a growing awareness of downward trends in water consumption. nonetheless, this was not evident in the projects reviewed by the court, as these trends were not well recognised in the 1990s or early 2000s, when the audited projects were prepared and implemented. 
72. a) Teadlikkus veetarbimise langussuunast on kasvanud. Seda aga ei nähtunud kontrollikoja analüüsitud projektidest, sest neid suundumusi ei olnud 1990. aastatel ja 21. sajandi esimestel aastatel, mil auditeeritud projektid koostati ja rakendati, veel eriti märgata.
72. (b) the commission agrees that there is scope for improvement, though it is difficult to achieve in each case a perfect match between ex-ante demand and savings forecasts against the real outcome. rEply of thE coMMIssIon recommendation 1 (a) (i) the commission agrees that the identified issues in the recommendations are important elements to ensure improved sustainability of the regions concerned. the commission considers that the progressive implementation of the water framework directive will significantly contribute towards addressing these issues. (a) (ii) the commission agrees on the importance of identifying all possible alternative solutions and supports this recommendation. 
72. b) Komisjon nõustub, et arenguruumi on, ent täiuslikku tasakaalu ex ante nõudluse ja säästuprognooside ning tegeliku tulemuse vahel on igal üksikul juhul raske saavutada.
It has already acknowledged the importance of those issues in its communication on water scarcity and droughts, adopted in 2007. (b) (i) In its communication on water scarcity and droughts, adopted in 2007, the commission has stressed the importance of identifying and implementing prevention measures (e.g. water saving, alternative solutions, water pricing policy). the commission considers that stricter requirements for applications, the working document on cost-benefit analysis and an updated cba guide should improve the quality of cbas and provide a common framework for project appraisal. 
Komisjon leiab, et vee raamdirektiivi järkjärguline rakendamine aitab oluliselt kaasa nende küsimuste lahendamisele. a) ii) Komisjon nõustub kõigi võimalike lahenduste tuvastamise tähtsusega ja toetab seda soovitust. Komisjon on juba tunnustanud nende küsimuste tähtsust oma 2007. aasta teatises veepuuduse ja põua kohta. b) i) 2007. aasta teatises veepuuduse ja põua kohta rõhutas komisjon ennetusmeetmete tuvastamise ja rakendamise tähtsust (nt vee säästmine, alternatiivsed lahendused, vee hinnapoliitika).
Improving water supply efficiency is crucial; other criteria also need to be taken into account as appropriate. 72. (c) the legislative framework applicable at the time of the design and submission for approval of the audited projects stipulated clearly the responsibilities of the commission with regard to the approval of cohesion fund projects and major projects. the commission considers that managing authorities have an important role in ensuring that selected projects meet these performance standards. 
Komisjon leiab, et taotlustele rangemate nõuete kehtestamine, tasuvusanalüüsi töödokument ja tasuvusanalüüsi juhendi uuendamine peaksid aitama parandada tasuvusanalüüside kvaliteeti ja moodustama üldise raamistiku projektide hindamiseks. veevarustuse tõhususe suurendamine on määrava tähtsusega; vaja on arvesse võtta ka muid tingimusi.
58 (b) (ii) the progressive implementation of the water framework directive which harmonises the rules on water management in the EU will allow more efficient water resource management. 
58 b) ii) ELi veemajanduse eeskirju ühtlustava vee raamdirektiivi järkjärguline rakendamine tagab veeressursside tõhusama majandamise.
74. the commission recognises that there were deficiencies in monitoring data. however, the commission considers that current monitoring tools (final reports for cohesion fund projects and annual and final reports for Erdf major projects) are helpful to inform on the achievements of projects. the commission verifies the respect of conditions at the time of final payment. recommendation 2 (a) the commission agrees that periods in which projects remain idle due to lack of complementary infrastructure should be reduced, even though it notes that the complexity of such projects may sometimes be an inherent factor contributing to delays. 
Sellegipoolest leiab komisjon, et olemasolevad seirevahendid (ühtekuuluvusfondi projektide lõppra-portid ja ERFi suurprojektide aasta-ja lõppraportid) annavad ülevaate projektide elluviimisest. Komisjon kontrollib tingimuste täitmist lõppmakse tegemise ajal. 2. soovitus a) Komisjon nõustub, et perioode, mil projektid toetava infrastruktuuri puudumise tõttu seisma jäävad, tuleks lühendada, ent juhib tähelepanu sellele, et niisuguste projektide keerukus võib mõnikord paratamatult viivitusi põhjustada.
In order to strengthen capacity of the new Member states to prepare mature projects, the jaspers facility was set up for the programming period 2007–13. the commission also agrees that better monitoring of achievements can help Member states improve project management. rEply of thE coMMIssIon (b) for the programme period 2007–13 and in the framework of the simplification exercise undertaken in 2008–10, the provisions for reporting on Erdf and major projects have been significantly simplified and streamlined to allow for an easier and more efficient monitoring. 
Programmiperioodiks 2007–2013 loodi rahastamisvahend jaspers, et suurendada uute liikmesriikide suutlikkust küpseid projekte ette valmistada. Komisjon nõustub ka sellega, et tulemuste parem järelevalve aitab liikmesriikidel parandada projektijuhtimise kvaliteeti.
75. (a) the commission agrees with the objective of minimising as much as possible delays in the implementation of co-financed projects. nonetheless, it notes that the complexity of such projects may sometimes be an inherent factor contributing to delays. 
KOmISjONI vASTUSED b) Programmiperioodiks 2007–2013 ja 2008.–2010. aasta lihtsustamispüüete raames on oluliselt lihtsustatud ERFi ja suurprojektide aruandlust, et tagada lihtsam ja tõhusam seire. 75. a) Komisjon nõustub võimalike viivituste miinimumini viimise eesmärgiga kaasrahastatud projektide elluviimisel.
59 recommendation 3 (a) (i) the commission supports this recommendation. the commission considers that managing authorities have an important role in ensuring that selected projects meet these performance standards. 
Eriaruanne nr 9/2010 – Kas ELi struktuurimeetmete kulutusi kodumajapidamiste veega varustamisele kasutatakse optimaalselt? 59 3. soovitus a) i) Komisjon toetab soovitust.
In this respect, to strengthen capacity in the new Member states the jaspers facility was set up for the programming period 2007–13. 
Sellega seoses loodi programmiperioodiks 2007–2013 rahastamisvahend jaspers, et suurendada uute liikmesriikide suutlikkust.
In addition, the correct implementation of the directive on environmental assessment of plans and programmes (directive 2001/42/Ec) is relevant in this regard. (a) (ii) the commission supports this recommendation and refers to its reply to (a)(i) above. the correct implementation of the directive on environmental assessment of projects (directive 85/337/EEc, as amended) is relevant in this regard. (a) (iii) the commission refers to its reply to (a)(i) above. (b) the commission intends to ensure that the reinforced provisions for the 2007–13 period are fully implemented and bring the desired results. rEply of thE coMMIssIon (b) (i) the jaspers facility provides technical assistance to the new Member states when they are preparing to submit major projects to the commission. the commission also has a contract with outside sectoral experts who can be consulted on technical and socioeconomic aspects of project applications. 
Lisaks on selles kontekstis oluline teatavate kavade ja programmide keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi (2001/42/Eü) nõuetekohane rakendamine. a) ii) Komisjon nõustub selle soovitusega ja viitab punkti a alapunktile i antud vastusele. Selles kontekstis on tähtis projektide keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi 85/337/Emü nõuetekohane rakendamine. a) iii) Komisjon viitab punkti a alapunktile i antud vastusele. b) Komisjon kavatseb tagada, et perioodiks 2007–2013 täiustatud sätteid järgitakse ja et saavutatakse soovitud tulemused.
It considers that these steps will significantly improve the quality of applications prior to submission to the commission. (b) (ii) the cost recovery principle will become applicable by the end of 2010, according to article 9 of the water framework directive. the commission considers that this will increase the efficient use of EU funds. 
Komisjon usub, et need sammud parandavad oluliselt taotluste kvaliteeti enne nende esitamist komisjonile. b) ii) Kulude katmise põhimõte rakendub 2010. aasta lõpuks kooskõlas vee raamdirektiivi artikliga 9. Komisjon leiab, et see suurendab ELi vahendite kasutamise tõhusust.
European court of auditors special report no 9/2010 Is Eu structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? luxembourg: publications office of the European Union 2010 — 59 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm Isbn 978-92-9207-845-4 doi:10.2865/16131 
Euroopa Kontrollikoda eriaruanne nr 9/2010 Kas eLi struktuurimeetmete kulutusi kodumajapidamiste veega varustamisele kasutatakse optimaalselt? Luxembourg: Euroopa Liidu väljaannete Talitus 2010 — 59 lk — 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-843-0 doi:10.2865/1452
free publications: how to obtain Eu publications • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Union’s representations or delegations. 
tasuta väljaanded: Kust saab eLi väljaandeid? • EU Bookshopi kaudu (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • Euroopa Liidu esindustest või delegatsioonidest.
You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. Priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). Priced subscriptions (e.g. annual series of the Official Journal of the European Union and reports of cases before the court of justice of the European union): • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm). 
Nende kontaktandmed saab veebisaidilt http://ec.europa.eu või saates faksi numbrile +352 2929-42758. tasulised väljaanded: • EU Bookshopi kaudu (http://bookshop.europa.eu). tasulised tellimused (nt euroopa Liidu teataja aastatellimused ja euroopa Liidu Kohtu kohtulahendite kogumikud): • Euroopa Liidu väljaannete Talituse edasimüüjate kaudu (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_et.htm).
EUropEan coUrt of aUdItors qj-ab-10-008-En-c 
EUROOPA KONTROLLIKODA Qj-AB-10-008-ET-C
european CourT of audiTors en The Commission’s managemenT of general budgeT supporT in aCp, laTin ameriCan and asian CounTries special report no 11 2010 issn 1831-0834 
EUROOPA KONTROLLIKODA ET ÜLDISE EELARVETOETUSE KOMISJONIPOOLNE HALDAMINE AKV, LADINA-AMEERIKA JA AASIA RIIKIDES Eriaruanne nr 11 2010 ISSN 1831-0818
special report no 11 2010 The Commission’s managemenT of general budgeT supporT in aCp, laTin ameriCan and asian CounTries (pursuant to article 287(4), second subparagraph, Tfeu) european CourT of audiTors 
Eriaruanne nr 11 2010 ÜLDISE EELARVETOETUSE KOMISJONIPOOLNE HALDAMINE AKV, LADINA-AMEERIKA JA AASIA RIIKIDES (vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 287 lõike 4 teisele lõigule) EUROOPA KONTROLLIKODA
european CourT of audiTors 12, rue alcide de gasperi 1615 luxembourg luXembourg Tel. +352 4398-1 fax +352 4398-46410 e-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu special report no 11 2010 a great deal of additional information on the european union is available on the internet. it can be accessed through the europa server (http://europa.eu). 
EUROOPA KONTROLLIKODA 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-post: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Eriaruanne nr 11 2010 Lisateavet Euroopa Liidu kohta saate internetist Euroopa serverist (http://europa.eu). Kataloogimisandmed on väljaande lõpus.
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication luxembourg: publications office of the european union, 2011 isbn 978-92-9237-028-2 doi:10.2865/90830 © european union, 2011 reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-026-8 doi:10.2865/90007 © Euroopa Liit, 2011 Allikale viitamisel on reprodutseerimine lubatud.
5 glossarY acP: african, Caribbean and pacific states cPIa: Country policy and institutional assessment Edf: european development funds GBs: general budget support mdG: millennium development goals PEfa: public expenditure and financial accountability Pfm: public finance management sBs: sector budget support special report no 11/2010 – The Commission’s management of general budget support in aCp, latin american and asian countries 
5 LÜHENDID AKV: Aafrika, Kariibi mere ja Vaikse ookeani piirkonna riigid CPIA: Hinnang riigi poliitikale ja institutsioonidele (Country Policy and Institutional Assessment) EAF: Euroopa Arengufondid EL: Euroopa Liit PEFA: Riiklike kulutuste ja finantsaruandluse hinnang (Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability) Eriaruanne nr 11/2010 – Üldise eelarvetoetuse komisjonipoolne haldamine AKV, Ladina-Ameerika ja Aasia riikides
II. gbs programmes typically consist of a support package involving the transfer of funds, capacity-building measures, dialogue with the partner country and the establishment of conditions for disbursement. a number of other donors use gbs and the Commission has to coordinate its programmes closely with theirs. special report no 11/2010 – The Commission’s management of general budget support in aCp, latin american and asian countries 
Komisjon on üldist eelarvetoetust viimasel kümnel aastal järjest rohkem kasutama hakanud, et saavutada oma arengupoliitika peamine eesmärk – vaesuse vähendamine. II. Üldise eelarvetoetuse programmid koosnevad tavaliselt abipaketist, mis hõlmab vahendite ülekandmist, suutlikkuse suurendamise meetmeid, dialoogi partnerriigiga ja väljamaksetingimuste kehtestamist.
III. as with other aid modalities, the ultimate impact of gbs on poverty reduction depends on the specific circumstances in each country. it also depends on the effective Commission’s management of its gbs programmes. 
III. Nagu muude abimeetmete puhul, sõltub ka üldise eelarvetoetuse lõplik mõju vaesuse vähendamisele iga riigi eritingimustest.
The Court found that, whilst the Commission has made considerable efforts over the last decade to develop its approach to providing aid through gbs, there are still weaknesses in the methodology and management of gbs programmes in aCp, latin american and asian countries, which are thus less likely to reach their full potential effectiveness. 
Kontrollikoda leidis, et komisjon on viimasel kümnel aastal teinud olulisi jõupingutusi, täiustamaks abi andmist üldise eelarvetoetuse kaudu, kuid endiselt esineb puudusi meetodites ja üldise eelarvetoetuse programmide haldamises AKV, Ladina-Ameerika ja Aasia riikides.
The Court found that, whilst a positive feature of the Commission’s approach is the systematic inclusion of macroeconomic and pfm objectives, the objectives of gbs programmes do not sufficiently take into account the specific circumstances and changing priorities of partner countries, as well as other programmes implemented by the Commission and other donors. furthermore, although some improvement has been noted in more recent programmes, the objectives of the programmes tend to be formulated in terms which are too general and this hinders the design of the various components of the programmes and makes it more difficult to hold the Commission accountable for their effectiveness. eXeCuTive summarY v. The Commission has not yet developed a sound risk management framework to properly assess and reduce the risks of its gbs programmes. 
Kontrollikoda leidis, et komisjoni lähenemisviisi puhul on positiivne makromajanduslike ja riigi rahanduse juhtimise eesmärkide süstemaatiline kaasamine, kuid üldise eelarvetoetuse programmide eesmärkides ei võeta piisavalt arvesse partnerriikide eritingimusi ja muutuvaid prioriteete, samuti komisjoni ja teiste rahastajate elluviidavaid muid programme. Lisaks on viimastes programmides täheldatud küll mõningast edasiminekut, kuid programmide eesmärgid on sageli sõnastatud liiga üldiselt, mis takistab programmi eri osade väljatöötamist ja raskendab programmide mõjususega seonduva komisjonipoolse vastutuse määratlemist. KOKKUVÕTE V. Komisjon ei ole veel välja töötanud usaldusväärset riskijuhtimise raamistikku, mille abil nõuetekohaselt hinnata ja vähendada üldise eelarvetoetuse programmide riske.
This is of particular importance in view of the high levels of fiduciary risk associated with weak pfm systems and significant levels of corruption, and of the development risk arising from weaknesses in the national development strategies of many partner countries. vI. 
See on eriti vajalik, arvestades suurt usaldusega seotud riski, mis tuleneb nõrkadest riigi rahanduse juhtimissüstee-midest ja kõrgest korruptsioonitasemest. Samuti tuleb arvesse võtta arenguriski, mida põhjustavad puudused paljude partnerriikide riiklikes arengustrateegiates.
The rationale followed by the Commission to set the amount of funds to be allocated to individual gbs programmes is not clear. it was, however, noted that the Commission has improved the predictability of its disbursements to partner countries which is important for their budgetary management. vII. 
Loogika, mille alusel määrab komisjon kindlaks rahasummad üldise eelarvetoetuse programmidele eraldamiseks, on ebaselge. Siiski täheldati, et komisjon on parandanud partnerriikidele tehtavate eraldiste prognoositavust, mis on oluline eelarve haldamise seisukohast.
The capacity-building support provided is useful in strengthening pfm, although it was not based on an appropriate assessment of priority needs. in particular, insufficient attention has been given to the need to strengthen oversight bodies such as supreme audit institutions, parliaments and civil society organisations seeking to monitor government use of budgetary resources. it has also been little used to support other gbs objectives, notably in relation to health and education. 
Suutlikkuse suurendamiseks antud abi on riigi rahanduse juhtimise tugevdamiseks oluline, ehkki abi andmisel ei lähtutud esmavajaduste nõuetekohasest hindami-sest; eelkõige on ebapiisavalt tähelepanu pööratud vajadusele tõhustada järelevalveasutusi, nagu kõrgeimad kontrolliasutused, parlamendid ja kodanikuühiskonna organisatsioonid, mille eesmärk on kontrollida, kuidas valitsus eelarvelisi vahendeid kasutab.
The Commission has often not been able to fully implement the capacity-building support within the timeframe of the gbs programmes. however, in 2008 the Commission adopted a strategy that aims to improve the effectiveness of its technical cooperation. 
Komisjonil ei ole tihti võimalik olnud suutlikkuse suurendamise abi täielikult rakendada üldise eelarvetoetuse programmide ajakava raames. Komisjon võttis aga 2008. aastal vastu strateegia, mille eesmärk on parandada komisjoni tehnilise koostöö efektiivsust.
7 special report no 11/2010 – The Commission’s management of general budget support in aCp, latin american and asian countries 
7 Eriaruanne nr 11/2010 – Üldise eelarvetoetuse komisjonipoolne haldamine AKV, Ladina-Ameerika ja Aasia riikides
vIII. 
VIII.
The performance-based conditions attached by the Commission to disbursement of gbs are generally relevant but are unlikely to achieve their intended incentive effect because of the way they are designed and implemented. it is often difficult to assess whether conditions have been met or not, in particular because of a lack of clarity over what constitutes satisfactory progress, and weaknesses in the statistical systems used for assessing results. 
Komisjoni seatud tulemuspõhised tingimused üldise eelarvetoetuse väljamaksmiseks on üldjuhul asjakohased, kuid ei saavuta oma ülesehituse ja rakendamise viisi tõttu tõenäoliselt soovitud stimuleerivat mõju. Sageli on keeruline hinnata, kas tingimused on täidetud või mitte, eelkõige seetõttu, et on ebaselge, mida pidada rahuldavaks edasiminekuks, samuti puuduste tõttu tulemuste hindamiseks kasutatud statistilistes süsteemides.
IX. whilst gbs programmes have had a catalytic effect in respect of strengthening dialogue on the national budget and pfm, the Commission does not make full use of the instrument’s potential because it has insufficient expertise in the priority areas related to the gbs programmes’ objectives and there are weaknesses in its management of the dialogue process. 
IX. Ehkki üldise eelarvetoetuse programmid on aidanud tugevdada dialoogi riigi eelarve ja riigi rahanduse juhtimise üle, ei kasuta komisjon vahendi kõiki võimalusi ebapiisavate ekspertteadmiste tõttu üldise eelarvetoetuse programmide eesmärkidega seotud esmatähtsate valdkondade kohta, samuti puuduste tõttu dialoogiprotsessi komisjonipoolses juhtimises.
X. The Commission’s external reporting on general budget support tends to focus on its potential benefits to improving aid delivery but there is relatively little information on its actual impact on poverty reduction. an evaluation methodology which provides evidence on whether, and in what circumstances, budget support can make an effective contribution to poverty reduction has not yet been established. however, the Commission is leading donor efforts to develop such a methodology. eXeCuTive summarY XI. 
X. Komisjoni välisaruandlus üldise eelarvetoetuse kohta keskendub pigem selle võimalikele kasuteguritele abi andmise parandamisel, toetuse tegeliku vaesust vähendava toime kohta on aga suhteliselt vähe teavet. Ei ole veel välja töötatud hindamismetoodikat, mille abil välja selgitada, kas ja millistel tingimustel saab eelarvetoetus vaesuse vähendamisele mõjusalt kaasa aidata. Tuleb siiski öelda, et rahastajad teevad komisjoni juhtimisel jõupingutusi sellise metoodika väljatöötamiseks.
The Commission is aware of the need to improve its management of gbs and at the end of 2009 launched a revision of its internal guidelines to address most of the issues raised by the Court in this report which contains a series of recommendations for the Commission to consider in this context. 
Komisjon on teadlik vajadusest üldise eelarvetoetuse haldamist parandada ning alustas 2009. aasta lõpus oma sisesuuniste ülevaatamist, mille käigus püütakse lahendus leida enamikule kontrollikoja poolt käesolevas aruandes tõstatatud probleemidele.
8 special report no 11/2010 – The Commission’s management of general budget support in aCp, latin american and asian countries 
8 Eriaruanne nr 11/2010 – Üldise eelarvetoetuse komisjonipoolne haldamine AKV, Ladina-Ameerika ja Aasia riikides