natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In November 2017 the Commission published a Communication on the future of food and farming, which presents its thinking on the post-2020 CAP. 
Komisjon avaldas 2017. aasta novembris teatise toidutootmise ja pllumajanduse tuleviku kohta, milles tutvustas oma ngemust 2020. aasta jrgsest PPst.
In this document we analyse key trends and data relevant to agriculture and rural areas, present our views on the current CAP, and discuss criteria and key challenges for the new CAP. 
Selles analsitakse pllumajanduse ja maapiirkondade jaoks olulisi peamisi arengusuundi ja andmeid, tutvustatakse oma seisukohti praeguse PP kohta ning arutletakse uue PP kriteeriumide ja philiste kitsaskohtade le.
The Communication takes into account a number of recommendations the ECA has made over several years. 
Teatises on arvesse vetud mitmeid soovitusi, mille kontrollikoda on aastate jooksul esitanud.
It sets out an ambition to deliver a new performance-based framework. 
Selles seatakse suur eesmrk luua uus tulemusphine raamistik.
However we note that some of the statistics underlying the Communication do not meet the criteria we have set out in previous reports, and that the measures supported are, on the basis of the Communication, likely to be similar to those supported in the past. 
Sellest hoolimata theldab kontrollikoda, et osa teatise aluseks olevast statistikast ei vasta tema eelmistes aruannetes esitatud kriteeriumidele ning et teatise kohaselt toetatavad meetmed on tenoliselt ka tulevikus sarnased varem toetatud meetmetega.
IV. A key element of the Communication is advocacy of a “new delivery model” – based on increased flexibility and subsidiarity and giving Member States more responsibility for performance. 
IV. ks teatise phielemente on nn uue rakendamismudeli toetamine, mis phineb suuremal paindlikkusel ja subsidiaarsusel ning paneb liikmesriikidele suurema vastutuse tulemuslikkuse eest.
In our view, the success of the new delivery model requires: • Measures designed on the basis of solid scientific and statistical evidence demonstrating that they will deliver desired results; • The new “CAP strategic plans” setting relevant, ambitious and verifiable targets that are aligned with EU objectives; • A robust performance monitoring and evaluation framework; and • A solid accountability and audit chain providing assurance on both compliance and performance. 
Kontrollikoja arvates eeldab uue mudeli edukas rakendamine Ľ meetmeid, mis on vlja ttatud kindlate teaduslike ja statistiliste tendite alusel, mis nitavad, et need viivad soovitud tulemuseni; Ľ PP uusi strateegilisi kavasid, milles on seatud asjakohased suurte sihtidega ja kontrollitavad eesmrgid, mis hilduvad ELi eesmrkidega; Ľ kindlat tulemuslikkuse seire-ja hindamisraamistikku; Ľ usaldusvrset aruandlus-ja auditiahelat, mis annab kindlust nii vastavuse kui ka tulemuslikkuse suhtes.
V. The Commission’s Communication does not represent a proposal. 
V. Komisjoni teatise nol ei ole tegemist ettepanekuga.
The criteria set out in this briefing paper will inform our future review of the Commission’s proposal when that is published. 
Kontrollikoda vaatab kesolevas infodokumendis kindlaksmratud kriteeriumide alusel komisjoni ettepaneku le, kui see on 4
We envisage that the review will then lead to an opinion on the final proposal. 4 
Lbivaatamise tulemusena kujundatakse eeldatavasti arvamus lpliku ettepaneku kohta. 5
INTRODUCTION Topic and purpose 1. 
SISSEJUHATUS Teema ja eesmrk 1.
The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is up for review, as the current seven-year planning period for EU finances and policy implementation ends in 2020. 
ELi hist pllumajanduspoliitikat (PP) ootab ees lbivaatamine seoses ELi rahanduse praeguse seitsmeaastase kavandamisperioodi ja poliitika rakendamise lppemisega aastal 2020.
The Commission intends to present its legislative proposal for the next CAP together with an impact assessment in May 2018. 
Komisjon kavatseb jrgmist PPd ksitleva seadusandliku ettepaneku esitada koos mjuhinnanguga 2018. aasta mais.
A key step in preparing the CAP reform for the period after 2020 came in November 2017, when the Commission published a Communication on the future of food and farming1. 
2020. aasta jrgse perioodi PP reformi ettevalmistamisel tehti oluline samm 2017. aasta novembris, mil komisjon avaldas teatise toidutootmise ja pllumajanduse tuleviku kohta1.
When the Commission announced its intention to issue the communication, we planned a high priority task to react to it in our 2018 Work Programme. 
Kui komisjon andis teada oma kavatsusest knealune teatis avaldada, vttis kontrollikoda pevakorda esmathtsa lesande anda sellele 2018. aasta tkava raames vastus.
On 6 December 2017, we also received a request for such a reaction from the Commissioner responsible, Mr Hogan. 
6. detsembril 2017 sai kontrollikoda vastavasisulise palve ka komisjoni vastutavalt volinikult Phil Hoganilt.
The Communication focuses on: • continuation of direct support to farmers, but with greater use of risk management tools and initiatives to increase farmers’ market rewards; • contributing more to EU environmental and climate objectives; • attention to the “socio-economic fabric” of rural areas; • greater focus on sustainable agricultural production, health, nutrition, food waste and animal welfare; • better use of research, innovation and technology, and financial instruments; and • a new delivery model based on greater flexibility and subsidiarity – giving Member States more responsibility for performance. 
Teatises keskendutakse jrgmistele punktidele: Ľ pllumajandustootjatele otsetoetuste maksmise jtkamine, kasutades seejuures rohkem riskijuhtimise vahendeid ja algatusi, mis aitavad tagada pllumajandustootjatele turul suurema tasu; Ľ suurem panustamine ELi keskkonna-ja kliimaeesmrkidesse; Ľ thelepanu pramine maapiirkondade sotsiaal-majanduslikule olukorrale; Ľ suurema rhu panemine kestlikule pllumajandustootmisele, sealhulgas tervisele, toitumisele, toidu raiskamise ksimusele ja loomade heaolule; Ľ teadusuuringute, innovatsiooni ja tehnoloogia ning rahastamisvahendite parem rakasutamine; COM(2017) 713 final: komisjoni teatis Euroopa Parlamendile, nukogule, Euroopa Majandus-ja Sotsiaalkomiteele ning Regioonide Komiteele Đ ăToidutootmise ja pllumajanduse tulevikŇ. 6 1
It is not our role, as the external auditor of the European Union (EU), to design the future policy. 
Euroopa Liidu (EL) vlisaudiitorina ei ole kontrollikoja lesanne tuleviku poliitikat kujundada.
However, drawing on our audit experience, we can offer advice to EU policymakers COM(2017) 713 final : Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The Future of Food and Farming. 
Kuid oma auditeerimiskogemustele tuginedes oskab kontrollikoda anda ELi poliitikakujundajatele nu selle kohta, kuidas parandada aruandlust ning PP ldist tulemuslikkust ja thusust.
This is the purpose of this paper, which is our response to the Commission’s Communication on the future of food and farming. 
See ongi kesoleva dokumendi eesmrk, millega annab kontrollikoda htlasi vastuse komisjoni teatisele toidutootmise ja pllumajanduse tuleviku kohta.
This is not an audit report. 
Tegemist ei ole auditiaruandega.
It is a review based on publicly available information. 
See on levaade, mille aluseks on avalikult kttesaadav teave.
Approach and presentation 5. 
Lhenemisviis ja tutvustus 5.
Our views expressed in this briefing paper2 are based on: • our previous work; • reviews of external reports and consultation with external experts; • discussions with the relevant Directorates-General of the Commission3. 
Infodokumendis2 vljendatud seisukohad phinevad Ľ kontrollikoja eelneval tl, Ľ vlisaruannete levaatamisel ja vlisekspertidega peetud konsultatsioonidel; Ľ aruteludel komisjoni asjaomaste peadirektoraatidega3.
In this briefing paper, we present: • key data and trends relevant to the farming sector and rural areas; • our views on the current CAP; • conclusions, including a set of criteria for assessing the CAP legislative proposal and the resulting future policy, and key challenges for the post-2020 CAP. 
Kesolevas infodokumendis tutvustatakse Ľ pllumajandussektori ja maapiirkondade jaoks olulisi phiandmeid ja peamisi arengusuundi; Ľ kontrollikoja seisukohti seoses praeguse PPga; Infodokument on lbivaatamise, mitte auditeerimise tulem.
As such, it does not involve new audit work, but is based on published audit findings, conclusions and recommendations, and other publicly available information. 
See ei hlma uut audititd, vaid phineb avaldatud auditileidudel, jreldustel ja soovitustel ning muul avalikult kttesaadaval teabel.
Annex I provides a full list of our publications referred to in this paper. 
I lisas on esitatud tielik loetelu kesolevas dokumendis osutatud ja kontrollikoja avaldatud vljaannetest.
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Directorate-General for Climate Action, Directorate-General for Environment, Eurostat, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. 
Pllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu peadirektoraat, kliimameetmete peadirektoraat, keskkonna peadirektoraat, Eurostat, regionaal-ja linnapoliitika peadirektoraat, tervise ja toiduohutuse peadirektoraat.
6 2 3 
7 2 3
Figure 1 – The CAP budget has been stable over several years Source: ECA, based on EU budgets. 
Nominaalvrtuses on PP eelarve psinud suhteliselt stabiilsena (vt joonis 1).
Around 72 % of the CAP budget is spent on direct payments to farmers, and so supports their incomes. 
Ligikaudu 72% PP eelarvest kulub pllumajandustootjatele makstavatele otsetoetustele, millega toetatakse nende sissetulekut.
These payments are generally paid per hectare of agricultural land, for the most part without a link to production, and with little decrease in support paid per hectare as farm size increases. 
Vljamakseid tehakse ldjuhul pllumajandusmaa hektarite alusel ja enamasti ei ole need tootmisega seotud, kuid hektari kohta makstav toetus vheneb vhesel mral sltuvalt sellest, mida suurem on pllumajandusettevte.
Around 22 % is spent on rural development measures, half of which are also paid to farmers on a per hectare basis. 
Umbes 22% maksetest on ette nhtud maaelu arengu meetmetele, millest pool makstakse pllumajandustootjatele samuti vlja hektariphiselt. lejnud vahenditest (6%) rahastatakse turumeetmeid.
According to Eurostat’s Farm Structure Survey, in 2013 there were 10.8 million farms in the EU, a 22 % decrease compared to the 13.8 million farms registered in 2007. 
Eurostati pllumajandusettevtete struktuuriuuringute kohaselt oli 2013. aastal ELis 10,8 miljonit pllumajandusettevtet ehk 22% vhem kui 2007. aastal, mil registreeritud pllumajandusettevtteid oli 13,8 miljonit.
Their average size increased by 28 % from 12.6 ha to 16.1 ha. 
Nende keskmine suurus suurenes 28% vrra 12,6 hektarilt 16,1 hektarile.
There was a parallel decrease (by 25 %) in the agricultural workforce from 12.8 million full-time job equivalents in 2005 to 9.5 million in 2017, principally concerning non-salaried work by farm managers4 and their families. Thus an average farm provides work for less than one full-time person (two-thirds of the CAP beneficiaries for the smallest farms spend less than a quarter of their working Farm manager is defined by the Eurostat as “the natural person responsible for the normal daily financial and production routines of running an agricultural holding. 
Samal ajal vhenes pllumajandussektori ttajate arv (25% vrra) 12,8 miljonilt tistajaga ttajalt 2005. aastal 9,5 miljonile 2017. aastal ning seda peamiselt seoses pllumajandusettevtete juhtide4 ja nende perekonna tehtava tasustamata tga. ks keskmine pllumajandusettevte annab seega td vhem kui hele tistajaga ttajale (kaks kolmandikku kige viksematest pllumajandusettevtetest, kes saavad PP toetust, kulutavad pllutdele vhem kui neljandiku oma tajast Đ vt ka 1. selgitus).
The value of agricultural production fluctuated but remained broadly at the same level in real terms. 
Pllumajandustootmise vrtus kll kikus, kuid ji ldjoontes reaalarvudes samale tasemele.
While the performance of different sectors varies widely, overall this resulted in a significant increase in income from farming per full-time person (see Figure 2). 
Kuigi eri sektorites on tulemuslikkus vga erinev, suurenes pllumajandustegevusest saadav sissetulek he tistajaga ttaja kohta mrkimisvrselt (vt joonis 2).
According to the OECD, the share of EU public support in gross farm receipts was 21 % in 2016, down from 24 % in 2007 and 33 % in 20005. 
OECD andmetel oli ELi avaliku sektori toetuse osakaal pllumajandusettevtete kogusissetulekust 2016. aastal 21% ehk viksem 2007. aasta 24% ja 2000. aasta 33% osakaalust5.
EU food prices have converged with world prices and the EU has become a net exporter of food 11. 
ELi toiduainete hinnad on maailmaturu hindadega htlustunud ja EList on saanud toiduainete netoeksportija 11.
The EU produces more food than it consumes, and has become a net food exporter (see Figure 3). 
EL toodab rohkem toiduaineid kui tarbida suudab ning on saanud toiduainete netoeksportijaks (vt joonis 3).
At the same time, EU prices have converged significantly with world food prices. 
Samal ajal on ELi hinnad mrkimisvrselt htlustunud toiduainete maailmaturu hindadega.
This trade surplus results principally from the EU’s strong position in processed food and beverages. 
See kaubandusbilansi lejk tuleneb peamiselt ELi tugevast turupositsioonist tdeldud toiduainete ja karastusjookide valdkonnas.
However, the EU remains a net importer of unprocessed farm products (labelled as “commodities” and “other primary” in Figure 3). 
Ttlemata pllumajandustoodete (joonisel 3 thistatud kui ăkaubadŇ ja ămuud phisaadusedŇ) sektoris jb EL siiski netoimportijaks.
Figure 3 – EU has become a net exporter of food Source: Comext – facts and figures. 
Joonis 3. EList on saanud toiduainete netoeksportija Allikas: Comext Đ faktid ja arvud.
The average age of farm managers has increased, and the land data are inconsistent 12. 
Pllumajandusettevtete juhtide keskmine vanus on tusnud ja maaga seotud andmed ei ole jrjepidevad 12.
In 2010, for every 100 farm managers above 55, there were 14 farm managers below 35. 
2010. aastal oli iga 100 le 55-aastase pllumajandusettevtte juhi kohta 14 alla 35-aastast pllumajandusettevtte juhti.
The average age of EU 9 million euros 150 000 100 000 50 000 0 -7 538 2007 Commodities EU 28: Structure of Agri-food trade 2007-2017 with extra EU 28 20 527 50 000 100 000 150 000 2008 2009 Other primary 2010 2011 Processed 2012 Food preparations 2013 2014 2015 Beverages Non-edible 2016 2017 Balance Imports Exports 
ELi pllumajandusettevtjate keskmine vanus tusis 2004.Đ 11 miljonit eurot 150 000 100 000 50 000 0 50 000 100 000 150 000 EL 28: muude kui EL 28 riikidega aastatel 2007Đ2017 toimunud pllumajandus-ja toiduainete sektori kaubanduse struktuur -7 538 2007 Kaubad 2008 2009 Muud phisaadused 2010 2011 Tdeldud 2012 2013 Toiduained Joogid 2014 2015 Mittesdavad 2016 2017 Saldo 20 527 Import Eksport
farmers increased from 49.2 to 51.4 years over the period 2004 to 20136. 
2013. aastal 49,2 eluaastalt 51,4 eluaastani6.
This is in line with wider demographic trends. 
See on koosklas ldiste demograafiliste arengusuundadega.
We note that the smallest farms are most often those of older farmers7. 
Vib theldada, et kige viksemad pllumajandusettevtted kuuluvad tihti eakamatele pllumajandusettevtjatele7.
According to the Farm Structure Survey, the total area of land used for agriculture has remained relatively stable over the decades. 
Pllumajandusettevtete struktuuriuuringute kohaselt on pllumajanduseks kasutatava maa ldpindala jnud viimaste kmnendite jooksul laias laastus samaks.
A similar picture emerges from the Commission data on the areas declared for CAP direct payments. 
Sama pildi annavad komisjoni andmed PP otsetoetuste taotlemisel teatatud pindala kohta.
However, a different trend (an 11.5 % decrease in the agricultural land declared) emerged from the Commission data underlying permanent grassland ratio reporting (see SR 21/2017). 
Psirohumaa pindala osakaalu ksitleva aruandluse aluseks olevate komisjoni andmete phjal on aga olukord teistsugune (teatatud pllumajandusmaa pindala on vhenenud 11,5%, vt eriaruanne 21/2017).
Crop statistics show a 4 % decline from 186.6 million hectares in 2006 to 178.8 million hectares in 2015. 
Kasvatatavate kultuuride statistika nitab 4%-list vhenemist 2006. aasta 186,6 miljonilt hektarilt 178,8 miljonile hektarile 2015. aastal.
More significant changes affect land allocation between different types of agricultural production8. 
Veel thelepanuvrsemad muutused on toimunud maa jaotuses pllumajandustootmise eri liikide vahel8.
Insufficient progress on environmental care and climate action 14. 
Ebapiisav areng keskkonnahoiu ja kliimameetmete vallas 14.
CAP context indicator C.23 (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_en); https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Eurostat’s Farm Structure Survey (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/farm-structure) and crop statistics (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database). CAP context indicators C.35, C 40, C.41, C.45 (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_en); JRC (2012) State of Soil in Europe (http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR25186.pdf); EEA (2015) State of the Nature in the EU (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu); DG AGRI, Facts and figures on EU agriculture and the CAP (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/facts-and-figures_en). 
Pllumajandustegevusega seonduvad keskkonnamured on seotud nelja alljrgneva phiprobleemiga9. USAs on peamise ettevtja keskmine vanus tusnud samal ajavahemikul veelgi enam (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/015_en.pdf). PP taustanitaja C.23 (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_et); https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Eurostati pllumajandusettevtete struktuuriuuring (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/farm-structure) ja pllumajanduskultuuride statistika (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database). PP taustanitajad C.35, C 40, C.41, C.45 (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_et); Teadusuuringute hiskeskus (2012): Euroopa mullastiku olukord (http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR25186.pdf); Euroopa Keskkonnaamet (2015): ELi looduse olukord (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu); pllumajanduse ja maaelu peadirektoraat: fakte ja numbreid ELi pllumajanduse ja PP kohta (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/facts-and-figures_et).
10 6 7 8 9 
12 6 7 8 9
(ii) Water quality: There is a persistent nitrogen surplus on EU farmland, averaging 50 kg nitrogen/ha. 
ELi pllumajandusmaadel on psiv lmmastikuliig: keskmiselt 50 kg N/ha.
Since 1993, levels of nitrates have decreased in rivers, but not in groundwater. 
Alates 1993. aastast on vhenenud nitraatide tase jgedes, kuid mitte phjavees.
Nitrate concentrations are still high in some areas, leading to pollution in many lakes and rivers, mainly in regions with intensive agriculture. (iii)Air: Ammonia is an important air pollutant. 
Mnes piirkonnas on nitraadisisaldus jtkuvalt suur, phjustades paljude jrvede ja jgede reostust Đ peaasjalikult piirkondades, kus tegeldakse intensiivpllumajandusega. iii) Íhk.
Farming generates almost 95 % of ammonia emissions in Europe. 
Peaaegu 95% Euroopa ammoniaagiheitest tekib pllumajandustegevuse tagajrjel.
While emissions have decreased by 23 % since 1990, they started to increase again in 2012. (iv) Soil: Around 45 % of mineral soils in the EU have low or very low organic carbon content (0-2 %) and 45 % have a medium content (2-6 %). 
Kui 1990. aastast peale on heitkogused 23% vrra vhenenud, siis 2012. aastal hakkasid need taas suurenema. iv) Muld. Ligikaudu 45% ELi mineraalmuldadest sisaldab kas vhe vi vga vhe orgaanilist ssinikku (0Đ2%) ja 45%-l mineraalmuldadest jb see sisaldus keskmisele tasemele (2Đ 6%).
Soil trends are difficult to establish due to data gaps, but declining levels of organic carbon content contribute to declining soil fertility, and increased risks of desertification. 
Andmete lnklikkuse tttu on mullastiku muutusi raske jlgida, kuid ha viksem orgaanilise ssiniku sisaldus vhendab mullaviljakust ning suurendab krbestumise ohtu.
The main concern regarding climate change is greenhouse gas emissions. 
Kliimamuutustega seoses on phimure kasvuhoonegaaside heide.
Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture accounted for 11 % of EU emissions in 2015. 
Pllumajanduse kasvuhoonegaaside heide moodustas 2015. aastal ELi heitkogustest 11%.
These emissions decreased by 20 % between 1990 and 2013, but started to rise again in 2014. 
Aastatel 1990Đ 2013 vhenes pllumajanduse kasvuhoonegaaside heide 20% vrra, kuid alates 2014. aastast on see taas suurenenud.
Net removals from land use, land use change and forestry offset around 7 % of all EU greenhouse gas emissions in 2015. 
Maakasutuse, maakasutuse muutuse ja metsandusega seotud netosidumine kompenseeris 2015. aastal ligikaudu 7% ELi kasvuhoonegaaside koguheitest.
At the same time, agriculture is uniquely vulnerable to climate change, which is one factor contributing to the stagnation of wheat yields in parts of Europe, despite continued progress in crop breeding. 
Samal ajal on pllumajandus erakordselt haavatav kliimamuutuste suhtes, mis on ks tegureist, mis phjustab Euroopa eri osades nisu saagikuse stagnatsiooni vaatamata 13
Agriculture accounts for more than 50 % of freshwater use in Europe. 
Pllumajandus tarbib enam kui 50% Euroopas tarbitavast mageveest.
Climate change has led to an increase in irrigation10. 
Kliimamuutused on suurendanud niisutamise vajadust10.
Economic differences between rural and other areas have become less significant 17. 
Majanduslik lhe maa-ja teiste piirkondade vahel on vhenenud 17.
According to Eurostat, in 2016 around 19.1 %11 of people in the EU lived in rural areas, compared to 19.7 % in 2007. 
Eurostati andmetel elas 2016. aastal umbes 19,1%11 ELi elanikkonnast maapiirkondades, mille vrdluseks vib tuua 2007. aasta 19,7%.
In 2013, GDP per capita in rural areas was 73 % that of the EEA (2017). Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. 
2013. aastal moodustas maapiirkondade SKP elaniku kohta 73% kogumajanduse SKPst, olles seega tusnud 2008. aasta 70%-lt.
The EU average employment rate for rural areas is the same as for other areas, although rates differ between Member States. 
ELi keskmine thive mr on maapiirkondades sama mis teistes piirkondadeski, kuigi liikmesriigiti on see mr erinev.
The poverty rate declined in rural areas from 31.4 % in 2007 to 25.4 % in 2016. 
Vaesuse mr vhenes maapiirkondades 2007. aasta 31,4%-lt 25,4%-le 2016. aastal.
The economy of rural areas – like that of towns and cities – is dominated by the industrial and service sectors. 
Maapiirkondade majanduses Đ nagu ka vike-ja suurlinnade majanduses Đ on valdavad tstus-ja teenindussektor.
Together (according to Eurostat), these represent 96 % of the gross value added generated in rural areas. 
Kokku moodustavad need (Eurostati andmetel) 96% maapiirkondade kogulisandvrtusest.
Agriculture, forestry and fishery represents 4 % of the gross value added generated in rural areas, compared to 1.5 % in the whole economy. 
Pllumajandus, metsandus ja kalandus moodustavad maapiirkondade kogulisandvrtusest 4% ning kogumajanduse kogulisandvrtusest 1,5%.
This share has been stable over the last five years. 
See osakaal on psinud viimase viie aasta jooksul stabiilsena.
OUR REVIEW 19. 
KONTROLLIKOJA TEHTUD LBIVAATAMINE 19.