natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court recommends that the Commission considers the merits of alternative approaches to simplify and reduce the costs of the scheme and improve the effectiveness of the aid. 
Kontrollikoda soovitab komisjonil kaaluda alternatiivsete lhenemisviiside vrtust, et lihtsustada ja vhendada toetuskava kulusid ja parandada toetuse mjusust.
The Commission should consider if this could best be achieved by aligning the schemeŐs procedures and rules for the eligibility of expenditure with those of the Rural Development investment measures. 
Komisjon peaks kaaluma, kas selle eesmrgi saavutamiseks tuleks toetuskava menetlused ja kulude abiklblikkuskriteeriumid koosklastada maaelu arendamise investeerimismeetmetega.
Whichever approach is followed, the Commission should improve its monitoring of the effectiveness of the aid and use the planned evaluation study in 2009 to establish the reasons for the relative lack of progress by producer organisations, particularly in those Member States where the fruit and vegetables sector represents the highest proportion of agricultural output. 
Sltumata lhenemisviisist peaks komisjon parandama toetuse mjususe jrelevalvet ja kasutama kavandatud 2009. aasta hindamisuuringut mratlemaks, mis phjustab tootjaorganisatsioonide suhteliselt vheseid edusamme, eriti nendes liikmesriikides, kus puu-ja kgiviljasektor esindab pllumajandustoodangu suurimat osa.
X. If the evaluation confirms that producer organisations are an effective mechanism for strengthening the position of growers in these Member States, the policy should be better targeted to achieve this. 
X. Kui hindamine kinnitab, et tootjaorganisatsioonid on nendes liikmesriikides mjusaks puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajate positsiooni tugevdamise vahendiks, peaks poliitikat paremini suunama selle saavutamisele.
If, on the other hand, the Commission cannot demonstrate that the concentration of supply in producer organisations delivers real benefits, it should reconsider this mechanism for supporting the EUŐs fruit and vegetable growers. 
Teisest kljest, kui komisjon ei suuda nidata, et pakkumise koondamine tootjaorganisatsioonidesse toob kaasa reaalset tulu, peaks kaaluma selle mehhanismi vajalikkust ELi puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajate toetamisel.
C 282/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 INTRODUCTION Objective of the aid scheme: adapting to the changing market situation 1. 
C 282/34 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 20.11.2006 SISSEJUHATUS Toetuskava eesmrk: kohanemine muutuva turuolukorraga 1.
Faced in the 1990s with a changing market for fruit and vegetables, requiring different products and increased guarantees of quality and environmental standards, the EU introduced a new aid scheme to support growers in adapting to this demand. 
1990. aastatel muutus olukord puu-ja kgiviljaturul, tekkis nudlus erinevate toodete ning paremate kvaliteeditagatiste ja keskkonnastandardite jrele. Selleks et toetada puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajaid nende nuetega kohanemisel, vttis EL kasutusele uue toetuskava.
This was the aid for Ôoperational programmesŐ, which is described below. 
Tegemist oli allpool kirjeldatud rakenduskavadele antava toetusega.
At the same time, cuts were made in the long-standing aid for withdrawals (1), providing a further incentive for the EUŐs growers to produce what the market wanted. 2. 
Samal ajal vhendati turult krvaldamise (1), pikaajalist toetust, stimuleerides ELi puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajaid tootma lhtuvalt turu nudlusest. 2.
The market situation was also changing with the increasing dominance of a few large retail and distribution groups. 
Turuolukorda muutis mnede suurte jaemgi-ja turus-tushenduste kasvav domineerimine.
In response, the EU strengthened the policy followed since the 1960s encouraging the formation of groups of growers known as Ôproducer organisationsŐ with a view to obtaining economies of scale and a stronger market presence. 
Sellele vastuseks tugevdas EL alates 1960. aastatest jrgitud poliitikat, mis innustas tootjaid rhmituste (tootjaorganisatsioonide) loomisele eesmrgiga saavutada mastaabisstu ja tugevamat turupositsiooni.
This grouping of supply (or ÔconcentrationŐ) was encouraged by making membership of a producer organisation a condition for receiving the new aid for operational programmes. 
Pakkumise rhmitamise (koondamise) toetamiseks kehtestati rakenduskavadele uue toetuse saamise tingimuseks tootjaorganisatsiooni kuulumine.
Fruit and vegetable growers not in producer organisations were not eligible for the EU aid. 
Puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajad, kes tootjaorganisatsioonidesse ei kuulu, ELi abi saamiseks klblikud ei ole.
This created an incentive for growers to form or join producer organisations. 
See andis tootjatele stiimuli tootjaorganisatsioonide loomiseks vi nendega liitumiseks.
At the same time, the EU set stricter conditions to be met by the producer organisations to ensure that they would be effective in concentrating the supply. 
Samal ajal kehtestas EL tootjaorganisatsioonidele rangemad tingimused, et tagada nende thusus pakkumise koondamisel.
The Court reported the results of its previous audit of the aids for the fruit and vegetable sector in the Annual Report for 2000 (2). 
Eelmise puu-ja kgiviljasektorile antud toetust ksitleva auditi tulemused esitas kontrollikoda oma 2000. aasta aastaaruandes (2).
At that time, few operational programmes had been completed, so the longer-term effectiveness of the aid was not apparent. 
Sel ajal oli enamik rakenduskavasid lpetamata, seega ei olnud toetuse pikaajaline mjusus ilmne.
However, the report identified weaknesses in the Member StatesŐ management of the scheme, which had reduced the effectiveness of the aid. 
Siiski toodi aruandes vlja liikmesriikide rakenduskava juhtimisega kaasnenud puudused, mis vhendasid toetuse mjusust.
Effectiveness is defined in the EUŐs Financial Regulation (3) as Ôattaining the specific objectives set and achieving the intended resultsŐ. As the objectives set for the operational programme aid scheme are not definite or quantified, in this audit, effectiveness is considered as making progress towards those objectives. 
Mjusust mratletakse ELi finantsmruses (3), jrgmiselt: Ňseatud eesmrkide ja kavandatud tulemuste saavutamineÓ. Kuna rakenduskavade toetuskavade eesmrgid ei ole kindlalt ega kvantitatiivselt mratletud, thendab mjusus selles auditis edusammude tegemist nende eesmrkide suunas.
6. (i) (ii) (iii) 7. (i) (ii) (iii) The questions set for this audit were: Has the aid scheme been implemented in a way to ensure that operational programmes are likely to be effective? 
6. i) ii) iii) 7. i) ii) iii) Auditi aluseks olid jrgmised ksimused: Kas toetuskava rakendati viisil, mis tagab rakenduskavade tenolise thususe?
Have the measures financed in operational programmes been effective? 
Kas rakenduskavade raames rahastatud meetmed olid tulemuslikud?
Haveproducerorganisationsmadeprogresstowardsachiev-ing the objectives set for the aid scheme? The audit approach consisted of: assessing the procedures established by the Commission and the Member States for implementing the policy; testing the effectiveness of a sample of operational programme actions; and examiningasampleofproducerorganisations,andCommis-sion data at EU level, for evidence of progress made by producer organisations towards the policy objectives. 
Auditi lhenemisviis hlmas: komisjoni kehtestatud menetluste hindamist ja liikmesriikide-poolset poliitika rakendamist; rakenduskavade meetmete valimi testimist; tootjaorganisatsioonide valimi kontrollimist ja komisjoni andmeid Euroopa Liidu kohta, et mrata kindlaks tootjaorganisatsioonide edusammud poliitika eesmrkide saavutamisel.
Text box 1 ÔAn intelligent aidŐ enthused the director of a fruit and vegetable producer organisation we visited. 
1. selgitus ŇIntelligentne toetusÓ, oli he klastatud puu-ja kgivilja tootva organisatsiooni direktor vaimustunud.
No longer does the EU hand out aid to growers to destroy their surplus fruit and vegetables that no one wants to buy. Now, the EU subsidises measures taken by the growers to adapt their production to the quantity and quality for which there is demand. 
Enam ei jaga EL abi soovimatu letoodangu hvitamiseks. Nd toetab EL puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajate vetud meetmeid, mille eesmrgiks on toota vastavalt nud-lusele kvantiteedi ja kvaliteedi osas.
Text box 2 ÔGrowing successŐ: The aid is linked to turnover, so the more producer organisations grow, the more aid they get to finance adaptation. 
2. selgitus Toetus kasvavale edukusele on seotud kibega: mida rohkem tootjaorganisatsioonid toodavad, seda rohkem toetust nad kohandamise rahastamiseks saavad.
This success should encourage more growers to form or join producer organisations, resulting in more bargaining power and a higher turnover, and therefore more aid for further adaptation... 
Sellised edusammud peaksid innustama jrjest enam tootjaid tootjaorganisatsioone looma vi nendega liituma, see tooks kaasa suurema lbirkimisju ja kibe ning seelbi rohkem toetust edasiseks kohandamiseks.
8. random sample of 30 operational programmes completed in 2003 and 2004 in eight Member States: Greece, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. 
8. husliku 2003. ja 2004. aastal lpetatud rakenduskava valimi kontrollimisel kaheksas liikmesriigis: Kreekas, Hispaanias, Prantsusmaal, Iirimaal, Itaalias, Hollandis, Portugalis ja hendkuningriigis.
Producer organisations in the new Member States were not included as they had not completed operational programmes at the time of the audit. 
Audit ei hlmanud tootjaorganisatsioone uutes liikmesriikides, kuna need polnud auditi toimumise ajaks rakenduskavasid lpetanud.
(2) Court of Auditors Ń Annual Report concerning the financial year 2000 (OJ C 359, 15.12.2001). 
(2) Kontrollikoda Đ 2000. eelarveaasta aastaaruanne (ET C 359, 15.12.2001).
(3) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1). 
(3) Nukogu 25. juuni 2002. aasta mrus (E, Euratom) nr 1605/2002 (ET, L 248, 16.9.2002, lk 1).
The audit fieldwork was undertaken in 2005, based on a (1) Growers who ÔwithdrawŐ surplus fruit and vegetables from the market to support prices (usually by destroying the produce) are paid compensation from the EU budget. 
2005. aastal lbi viidud auditi vlitd phinesid 30 ju-(1) Tootjatele, kes leliigse puu-ja kgiviljatoodangu turult hinnatoetuse eesmrgil krvaldavad (tavaliselt toodangu hvitamise teel), makstakse ELi eelarvest hvitist.
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/35 Producer organisations 9. 
20.11.2006 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 282/35 Tootjaorganisatsioonid 9.
A producer organisation is a group of growers who act together to strengthen their position in the market. 
Tootjaorganisatsioon on oma turupositsiooni tugevdamiseks koos tegutsevate puu-ja kgiviljakasvatajate hendus.
Many are cooperatives, but they can be groups of individuals or groups of companies. 
Paljude nol on tegemist histutega, kuid tegemist vib olla ka isikute vi ettevtete rhmadega.
The conditions to be met, set out in the EU regulations (1), are to have at least five members and a minimum turnover of 100 000 euro. 
ELi mrustes(1) stestatud tingimuste kohaselt peab tootjaorganisatsiooni kuuluma vhemalt viis liiget ja selle kive peab olema vhemalt 100 000 eurot.
Producer organisations have to provide the means for storing, packaging and marketing their membersŐ produce. 
Tootjaorganisatsioonidel peavad olema vahendid liikmete toodangu ladustamiseks, pakendamiseks ja turustamiseks.
They have to be able to plan and adapt their production, and promote environmentally sound cultivation and waste-management practices. 
Nad peavad suutma toodangut planeerida ja kohandada ning keskkonna-sbralikku tootmist ja jtmekitlustavasid edendada.
Once established, Member States check that producer organisations continue to meet these conditions, although no further aid is available for this. 
Edaspidi kontrollivad liikmesriigid, et tootjaorganisatsioonid tidaksid neid nudeid jtkuvalt, kuigi selleks edasist toetust ei anta.
In principle, the EU does not support producer organisationsŐ administrative, operating or production costs (2). 
Phimt-teliselt EL tootjaorganisatsioonide haldus-, tegevus-ja tootmiskulusid ei toeta (2).
There are some 1 500 producer organisations in the 14 Member States (3) (Diagram 1). 
14 liikmesriigis on ligikaudu 1 500 tootjaorganisatsiooni (3). (1. diagramm).
There is a great diversity in the sizes and nature of producer organisations (Diagram 2). 
Tootjaorganisatsioonide suurus ja iseloom vivad vga erinevad olla (2. diagramm).
In the course of this audit, the Court visited fig growers in Greece and mushroom growers in Ireland, a citrus fruit cooperative in Portugal and tomato growers from Spain to the Netherlands. 
Auditi kigus klastas kontrollikoda viigimarjakasvatajaid Kreekas, seenekasvatajaid Iirimaal, tsitrusviljade histut Portugalis ja tomatikasvatajaid Hispaaniast Hollandini.
The average EU producer organisation in 2003 had a turnover of 9 million euro and over 300 members. 
Keskmiselt oli 2003. aastal ELi tootjaorganisatsiooni kibeks 9 miljonit eurot ja sinna kuulus le 300 liikme.
Fruit and vegetables is the largest agricultural sector by value of output in the EU-15. 
Puu-ja kgiviljakasvatus on toodangu vrtuse phjal EL-15 suurim pllumajandusvaldkond.
It is particularly important to the agricultural economies of Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, where the sector represents over 25 % of the value of agricultural output. 
Eriti olulise pllumajan-dusvaldkonnaga on tegemist Kreekas, Hispaanias, Itaalias ja Portugalis, kus puu-ja kgiviljakasvatus esindab 25 % pllumajandustoodangu vrtusest.
Spain, France and Italy together account for 70 % of EU fruit and vegetable production by value. 
Hispaania, Prantsusmaa ja Itaalia osakaal moodustab 70 % ELi puu-ja kgiviljatoodangu vrtusest.
About a third of their production was marketed by producer organisations in 2004. 
2004. aastal turustati umbes kolmandik nende toodangust tootjaorganisatsioonide kaudu.
In the Netherlands, Belgium and Ireland, the proportion of fruit and vegetable output marketed by producer organisations was much higher, at around 80 %, whereas in Greece it was 13 % and in Portugal 6 % (Diagram 3). 
Hollandis, Belgias ja Iirimaal oli tootjaorganisatsioonide kaudu turustatud puu-ja kgiviljatoodangu osakaal palju suurem, ca 80 %, Kreekas oli see aga 13 % ja Portugalis 6 % (3. diagramm).
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 
(1) Nukogu 28. oktoobri 1996. aasta mrus (E) nr 2200/96 puu-ja kgiviljaturu hise korralduse kohta (ET, L 297, 21.11.1996, lk 1) ja komisjoni 11. augusti 2003. aasta mrus (E) nr 1432/2003, millega kehtestatakse nukogu mruse (E) nr 2200/96 ksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad tootjaorganisatsioonide tunnustamise ja tootjarh-made eeltunnustamise tingimuste kohta (ET, L 203, 12.8.2003, lk 18).
(3) Luxembourg has no producer organisations. 
(3) Luksemburgis tootjaorganisatsioone ei ole.
Diagram 1 Number of producer organisations in 2004 Diagram 2 Average value of marketed production per producer organisation 2004 (Mio EUR) The aid for operational programmes 13. 
1. diagramm 2. Tootjaorganisatsioonide arv 2004. a 2. diagramm Turustatud toodangu keskmine vrtus tootjaorganisatsiooni kohta 2004. a (mln EUR) Rakenduskavadele antav toetus 13.
Producer organisations that meet the conditions in paragraph 9 can apply for aid for an Ôoperational programmeŐ. 
Tootjaorganisatsioonid, kes tidavad punktis 9 toodud tingimused, vivad rakenduskavadele toetust taotleda.
This is a programme of measures that a producer organisation undertakes to adapt its membersŐ production to market demand and strengthen its position in the marketplace (Text box 3). 
Tegemist on meetmeprogrammiga, mida tootjaorganisatsioonid rakendavad liikmete toodangu turunudlusega kohandamiseks ja turupositsiooni tugevdamiseks (3. selgitus). Konkreetsed eesmrgid,
The specific objectives that the measures should aim to achieve are set in C 282/36 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Diagram 3 the Council regulation (1) (Text box 4). 
C 282/36 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 20.11.2006 3. diagramm mille saavutamise poole meetmed peaksid pdlema, on toodud nukogu mruses (1) (4. selgitus).
The programme is drawn up by the producer organisation and approved by the Member State, which pays EU aid annually of 50 % of the costs incurred by the producer organisation in implementing the programme. 
Rakenduskava koostavad tootjaorganisatsioonid ja selle kiidab heaks liikmesriik, kes maksab igal aastal tootjaorganisatsiooni rakenduskava rakendamisel tehtud kuludele 50 % ulatuses ELi toetust.
The duration of an operational programme is between three and five years, and at the end of the period a producer organisation may apply for a new programme. 
Rakenduskava kestus on kolm kuni viis aastat ja ajavahemiku lpus vib tootjaorganisatsioon taotleda uut rakenduskava.
There is an annual ceiling on the aid, set at 4,1 % of the producer organisationŐs turnover. 
Aastane toetuse lemmr on 4,1 % tootjaorganisatsiooni kibest.
Over 70 % of producer organisations have an operational programme and the aid amounted to 500 million euro in 2004. 
Rohkem kui 70 protsendil tootjaorganisatsioonidest on rakenduskava ja 2004. aastal moodustas toetus 500 miljonit eurot.
This represented 3 % of producer organisationsŐ turnover and approximately 1 % of the total value of EU fruit and vegetable output. 
See moodustab 3 % tootjaorganisatsioonide kibest ja ligikaudu 1 % ELi puu-ja kgiviljatoodangu koguvrtusest.
Take-up of the aid has increased greatly since it was introduced in 1997, at the same time as the aid for the withdrawal of surplus production has decreased (Diagram 4). 
Toetuse kasutamine on alates selle kasutuselevtmisest 1997. aastal oluliselt kasvanud, samal ajal on letoodangu turult krvaldamiseks antav abi vhenenud (vt 4. diagramm).
The diagram also shows the aid paid through producer organisations to growers of tomatoes and fruit for processing, which is based on the volume of production. 
Diagrammis esitatakse ka andmed tootjaorganisatsioonide kaudu tomatikasvatajatele ja puuviljattlemisettevtetele antava toodangu suurusel phineva toetuse kohta.
Text box 3 Typical contents of an operational programme Ń purchase of sorting and packing machinery Ń employment of quality control staff and marketing staff Ń investments in irrigation facilities and greenhouses Ń subsidies to growers for replanting fruit trees Ń costs of natural pest and disease control approaches (1) Regulation (EC) No 2200/96. 
3. selgitus Rakenduskava sisaldab tavaliselt jrgmiseid meetmeid Ń sorteerimis-ja pakkimismasinate ostmine, Ń kvaliteedikontrolli ja turundusvaldkonna ttajate palkamine, Ń investeeringud niisutusseadmetesse ja kasvuhoonetesse, Ń toetused viljapuude taasistutamisega tegelevatele tootjatele, Ń kahjurite ja haiguste loodusliku trje rahastamine.
Text box 4 The 11 operational programme objectives Ń ensuring that production is planned and adjusted to demand, particularly in terms of quality and quantity Ń promoting the concentration of supply and the placing on the market of the products produced by its members Ń reducing production costs and Ń stabilising producer prices Ń promoting the use of environmentally-sound cultivation practices, production techniques and waste-management practices Ń improvement of product quality Ń boosting productsŐ commercial value Ń promotion of the products targeted at consumers Ń creation of organic product lines Ń the promotion of integrated production or other methods of production respecting the environment Ń the reduction of withdrawals 15. 
4. selgitus Rakenduskavade 11 eesmrki Ń tootmine peab olema kavandatud ja kohandatud vastavalt nud-lusele, iseranis kvaliteedi ja kvantiteedi osas, Ń pakkumise koondamise ja tootjaorganisatsiooni liikmete toodangu turupositsiooni edendamine, Ń tootmiskulude vhendamine, Ń tootjahindade stabiliseerimine, Ń keskkonnasbralike tootmisviiside ja -tehnikate ning jtmekit-lustavade edendamine, Ń tootekvaliteedi parandamine, Ń toodete kaubandusliku vrtuse parandamine, Ń toodete aktiivne turustamine tarbijatele, Ń orgaaniliste tooterhmade loomine, Ń integreeritud tootmise vi muude keskkonnasbralike tootmisviiside edendamine, Ń toodangu turult krvaldamise vhendamine. 15.
Implementation of the aid scheme is on the usual shared management basis whereby Member States follow detailed rules, set by the Commission, within the framework of the Council Regulation. 
Toetuse rakendamine phineb tavaprasel liikmesriikidega koosts toimuval haldusel, mille kohaselt liikmesriigid jrgivad nukogu mruste raames komisjoni poolt kehtestatud ksikasjalikke eeskirju.
They are required to cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the aid is granted according to the principles of sound financial management: economy, efficiency and effectiveness. 
Liikmesriigid peavad komisjoniga koostd tegema, et tagada toetuse andmine vastavalt usaldusvrse finantsjuhtimise phimtetele.
Value of marketed production in 2004 
Turustatud toodangu vrtus 2004. a
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/37 16. The Commission implementing regulation (1) requires producer organisations to describe in their operational programme proposal: Ń their initial situation, in particular regarding production, marketing and equipment, Ń the objectives of the programme, bearing in mind the market outlook, and Ń the concrete measures or ÔactionsŐ proposed to achieve those objectives. 
20.11.2006 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 282/37 4. diagramm Tootjaorganisatsioonidele perioodil 1996Đ2004 makstud peamised toetused (EL-15) 16. Vastavalt komisjoni rakendusmrusele (1) peavad tootjaorganisatsioonid oma rakenduskava ettepanekus kirjeldama jrgmist: Ń oma esialgset olukorda, eriti tootmise, turustamise ja seadmete osas, Ń programmi eesmrke, lhtudes turuperspektiivist, Ń nende eesmrkide saavutamiseks kavandatavaid konkreetseid meetmeid vi tegevusi.
(1) CommissionRegulation(EC)No411/1997of3March1997(OJL62, 4.3.1997, p. 9), replaced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 of 11 August 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards operational funds, operational programmes and financial assistance (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 
(1) Komisjoni3.mrtsi1997.aastamrus(E)nr411/1997(ETL62, 4.3.1997, lk 9), asendati komisjoni 11. augusti 2003. aasta mrusega (E) nr 1433/2003, milles stestati nukogu mruse (E) nr 2200/96 ksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad seoses rakendusfondi-de, tegevuskavade ja rahalise abiga (ELT L 203, 12.8.2003, lk 25).
Producer organisations have the freedom to propose operational programme measures that suit their particular situation, with the proviso that the programmes must target ÔseveralŐ of the objectives set out in the Council regulation (see Text Box 4). 
Tootjaorganisatsioonidel on vimalik esitada ettepanekuid oma konkreetse olukorraga kige paremini sobivate rakenduskava meetmete kohta, tingimusel et programmid suunatakse mitmete nukogu mrusega stestatud eesmrgi saavutamisele (vt 4. selgitus).
To complete the feedback circuit, producer organisations are required to report to the Member State at the end of the programme on the extent to which they have achieved their objectives, and the lessons to be learnt for their next programme. 
Tagasiside saamiseks peavad tootjaorganisatsioonid programmi lpus liikmesriigile esitama aruande oma eesmrkide saavutamise ja saadud kogemuse kohta, pidades silmas 5. diagrammis toodud programmit mudelit.