natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The updated figures (see paragraph 30) outstanding at 31 December 2002 should read as follows: the total irregular payments reported since 1971 represent EUR 2 983 million. 
Vastavalt 31. detsembril 2002 ajakohastatud andmetele (vt lik 30) moodustavad kik alates 1971. aastast teavitatud eiramised 2 983 miljoni euro suuruse summa.
Of this sum, EUR 603 million (20 %) have been recovered and EUR 297 million have been written off (10 %). 
Sellest summast on tagasi nutud 603 miljonit (20 %) ja 297 miljonit on kustutatud (10 %).
The amount still pending represents EUR 2 083 million (70 %). 
Seni pooleliolevad juhtumid moodustavad 2 083 miljonit eurot (70 %).
These figures include also the updates which the Commission received in the year 2003 and the financial impact of Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million). 
Need arvud sisaldavad ka ajakohastatud andmeid, mis komisjon sai 2003. aastal ja komisjoni otsuse 2003/481/E finantsmju (75 miljonit eurot).
Some Member States do not fulfil their obligation to report within two months of the end of the quarter in which an irregularity was detected and/or new information concerning an irregularity has become known (Regulation (EEC) No 595/91, Articles 3(1) and 5(1)). 
Mned liikmesriigid ei tida oma kohustust anda aru kahe kuu jooksul prast iga kvartali lppu, mil eiramist mrgati ja/vi ilmnes uus eiramisega seotud teave (mrus 595/91, artikli 3 lige 1 ja artikli 5 lige 1).
Among these Member States, Germany and Spain account for more than 50 % of the reported irregularities. 
Nende liikmesriikide hulgas hlmavad Saksamaa ja Hispaania rohkem kui 50 % teavitatud eiramistest.
The Commission has made Member States aware of this problem by reporting this in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2) and discussing the problem in several meetings as Article 280 Working Group, Cocolaf and the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
Komisjon on liikmesriike sellest probleemist teavitanud, esitades selle komisjoni 2002. aasta aruandes pettustevastase vitluse kohta (lik 10.2.2.) ja arutades probleemi mitmel artikli 280 tgrupi, COCOLAFi ning pllumajandustoodete puhul esinevaid eiramisi ja vastastikust abi ksitleva tgrupi kohtumisel.
(6) Including the accounting and recovery aspects. 
(6) Sealhulgas raamatupidamis-ja sissenudmisaspektid.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/19 As regards inconsistencies, Member States have been informed of these and were asked to update these cases by sending digital updates. 
4.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 269/19 Liikmesriike on teavitatud ebahtlusest andmete osas ja neil on palutud asjaomased andmed elektroonilisel teel ajakohastada.
In meetings of Article 280 Working group, Cocolaf and the Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ explanation and ÔtrainingŐ concerning the ECR (Electronic Case Registry) database were given to Member States. In general it can be said that Member States have improved the reporting of irregularities, but not all obligations of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 are completely complied with. 
Artikli 280 tgrupi, COCOLAFi ning pllumajandustoodete puhul esinevaid eiramisi ja vastastikust abi ksitleva tgrupi kohtumistel anti liikmesriikidele selgitusi ja ŇkoolitustÓ seoses ECR (Elektrooniliste Juhtumite Register) andmebaasiga. ldiselt vib elda, et liikmesriigid on parandanud eiramistest aruandmist, kuid mitte kiki mruse (EM) nr 595/91 kohustusi ei jrgita tielikult.
As regards discrepancies, the Commission will continue its efforts to oblige Member States to respect all provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 in order to receive within the delays provided for fully reliable data which contain homogeneous information from all Member States. 
Komisjon jtkab oma jupingutusi erinevuste krvaldamiseks ja selleks, et kohustada liikmesriike titma kiki mruse 595/91 stteid, et saada kikidelt liikmesriikidelt ettenhtud thtajaks tiesti usaldatavad andmed, mis sisaldavad htlast teavet.
The updated rate of recovery was established at 20,2 % in May 2004 (see paragraph 30). 
2004. aasta mais ajakohastatud sissenudmiste osakaal oli 20,2 % (vt liku 30).
The Commission is fully aware of the fact that the recovery rate in Member States is not optimal and has undertaken to improve it, in particular with the creation of the Task Force Recovery (see also answer to paragraph V). 
Komisjon on tiesti teadlik asjaolust, et sissenudmiste protsent liikmesriikides ei ole optimaalne ja on otsustanud seda tsta, eelkige sissenuete trhma loomise teel (vt ka V ligu vastust).
Paying agencies and administrative bodies in charge of the recovery process in some Member States (Italy and Greece) have always claimed that they had to wait for the outcome of judicial criminal procedures before proceeding with the recovery, whereas the choice of a recovery process through a civil or administrative procedure is in some cases possible and does not preclude the launching of a parallel criminal judicial procedure. 
Makse-ja haldusasutused, mis mnedes liikmesriikides vastutavad sissenudmiste eest (Itaalia, Kreeka), on alati vitnud, et nad peavad sissenudmiseks ootama kriminaalasja kohtuliku menetluste tulemusi, samas kui mnel juhul on vimalik valida sissenudmiseks tsiviil-vi haldusmenetlus, mis ei vlista paralleelse kriminaalmenetluse algatamist.
Consequently, the initial choice of the Member State (administrative procedure, civil procedure, criminal procedure) will have consequences for the recovery delay. 
Seega mjutab liikmesriikide esialgne valik (haldus-, tsiviil-, kriminaalmenetlus) sissenudmiseks kuluvat aega.
For a limited number of Member States, administrative recovery procedures can be launched only after a final decision in the criminal judicial procedure if any, bearing in mind that the latter might take 15 years or more. 
Mnedes ksiku-tes liikmesriikides saab halduslikku sissenudmismenetlust alustada ksnes prast seda ja juhul, kui kriminaalmenetluses on tehtud lplik otsus, kusjuures tuleb meeles pidada, et viimane vib kesta 15 aastat vi rohkem.
In Italy, for the pre-1995 cases, 46 % were subject to a criminal procedure whereas this percentage represented 18 % only for the cases posterior to 1995, which could be explained by the Member States deciding to take the necessary administrative steps as early as possible and as soon as there was a notification of the irregularity. In shared management, the Member State responsible is in direct contact with the debtors. 
Enne 1995. aasta kohaldati Itaalias kriminaalmenetlust 46 % juhtudest, samas kui prast 1995. aastat on see protsent 18 %, mida vib phjendada sellega, et liikmesriik otsustas vtta vajalikud haldusmeetmed nii vara kui vimalik ja niipea kui oli olemas teade eiramisest. hise juhtimise puhul on vastutav liikmesriik vlgnikega otseses kontaktis.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 the Commission is legally obliged to exclude all expenditure from Community financing where that expenditure has not been executed in compliance with Community rules. 
Vastavalt mrusele (E) nr 1258/99 on komisjon seaduslikult kohustatud jtma henduse finantseerimisest vlja kik kulud, mida ei ole tehtud henduse eeskirjade kohaselt.
Accepting compromise settlements and/or partial payments should be assessed on a case-by-case approach on the basis of national law and in conjunction with the criteria as laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999. 
Kompro-misslahenduste ja/vi osaliste maksete heakskiitmist peab hindama siseriikliku igus alusel ja vastavalt henduses mruse (E) nr 1258/99 artiklis 8 esitatud kriteeriumidele iga juhtumi puhul eraldi.
V. Following the Communication of the Commission entitled ÔImproving the recovery of Community entitlements arising from direct and shared management of Community expenditureŐ of 3 December 2002 (COM(2002) 671 final), the Commission decided to set up a joint OLAF-Directorate-General for Agriculture Task Force Recovery in order to clear the burden of the past, i.e. all the irregularity cases prior to 1999 and still open in order to prepare a decision on whether the Community or the Member State bears the financial consequences. 
V. Prast henduse kulude otsese vi hise juhtimise tagajrjel hendusele vlgnevate summade sissenudmise parandamist ksitleva henduse 3. detsembri 2002. aasta teatise avaldamist (KOM(2002) 671 lplik) otsustas komisjon luua Euroopa Pettustevastase Ameti (OLAF) ja pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi hise sissenuete trhma, et vabaneda mineviku koormast, s.t kigist enne 1991. aastat tuvastatud ja seni pooleliolevatest eiramis-juhtumitest, valmistades ette otsus selle kohta, kas finantstagajr-gede eest vastutab hendus vi liikmesriik.
As regards the CourtŐs observation on the absence of adequate criteria for deciding whether sums written off should be charged to the Member States or borne by the Community, the Commission wishes to point out that it has developed, throughout time and on account of the acquired experience applied, four guiding principles and a number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002 (see also paragraph 44). 
Kontrollikoja thelepaneku osas, et puuduvad piisavad kriteeriumid, et otsustada, kas kustutatud summad peaksid kandma liikmesriigid vi hendus, juhib komisjon thelepanu sellele, et ta on ttanud aja jooksul vlja ja rakendanud tnu saadud kogemusele nelja juhtphimtet ja rida menetluskriteeriume, mis on dokumenteeritud 2002. aasta juulis. (Vt ka lik 44).
Since the creation of the Task Force Recovery in 2003, the Commission services have drawn up a list of detailed criteria with which all the cases are audited in order to have the amounts not recovered charged either to the Community or the Member State. 
Alates sissenuete trhma loomisest 2003. aastal on henduse talitused ttanud vlja ksikasjaliku kriteeriumide loetelu, mille alusel hinnatakse kiki juhtumeid, et selgitada vlja, kas sissenudmata summad katab hendus vi liikmesriigid.
Following the allocation of responsibilities stated in Annex 2 to Commission Document SEC(95) 249 dated 10 February 1995, UCLAF/OLAF was to receive all communications notified by Member States under Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 and was responsible for the analysis and follow-up of the cases in question, including input of the data concerned into the irregularity database. 
Prast lesannete jaotamist, mis on esitatud komisjoni 10. veebruari 1995. aasta dokumendi SEC(95) 249 2. lisas, tuli kik nukogu mrusele (EM) nr 595/91 alusel esitatud liikmesriikide teated saata UCLAFile/OLAFile, kelle lesanne oli analsida ja jlgida knealuseid juhtumeid, sealhulgas sisestada asjaomased andmed eiramiste andmebaasi.
OLAF responsibility in matters of recovery action related to cases of fraud and irregularity includes the production of summary notes for each case containing a rsum of the procedures performed and the reasoning behind the proposals for possible financial correction within the clearance-of-accounts procedure undertaken under the responsibility of the Directorate-General for Agriculture as Authorising Officer. 
Sissenudmismeetmete puhul, mis on seotud pettuse ja eiramiste juhtumitega, on samuti OLAFi lesanne teha iga juhtumi kohta kokkuvte, mis sisaldab lbiviidud menetluste lhilevaadet ja kus phjendatakse vimalikke finantskorrektsioone raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise menetluse raames, mille lbiviimise eest vastutab eelarvevahendite ksutajana pllumajanduse peadirektoraat.
The clearance procedure is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, but throughout its different steps, this DG is assisted by OLAF. 
Kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise menetlust teostab pllumajanduse peadirektoraat, kuid erinevate etappide kigus aitab peadirektoraati OLAF.
See also paragraph IX. 
(Vt ka punkti IX.)
The Commission always draws the legal consequences for the fraud proofing and control capability of the existing CAP regulations, taking on board in particular the follow-up recommendations of the Office. The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities. 
Komisjon vtab alati arvesse, et hise pllumajanduspoliitika aluseks olevad normid oleksid pettusekindlad ja vimaldaksid kontrollimist, arvestades eriti jlgimistegevust ksitlevaid OLAFi soovitusi. Komisjon leiab, et OLAFi ja pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi vaheline lesannete jaotus on selgelt mratletud. Vastavalt komisjoni 10. veebruari 1995. aasta teatise SEC(95) 249 2. lisale on OLAF vastutav sissenudmise eest eiramiste puhul, millest on teatatud.
C 269/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 VII. 
C 269/20 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.11.2004 VII.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 established, in the field of EAGGF Guarantee, a system for identifying economic operators who present a high risk for the Community Budget through a communication system via the Commission. 
Nukogu mrusega (E) nr 1469/95 loodi EAGGF tagatisrahastu valdkonnas henduse eelarvele suurt ohtu kujutavate ettevtjate tuvastamiseks ssteem, mille kigus teave edastatakse lbi komisjoni.
After eight years of application of this Regulation, it appears that the number of communications is rather limited if not weak. 
Knealuse mruse 8aastase kohaldamise jrel nib, et teabevahetus on kllaltki piiratud kui mitte nrk.
The Commission has extensively discussed the matter in the framework of the Irregularities and Mutual Assistance/Agriculture products group and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the blacklist Regulation and suggested options for action. 
Komisjon on seda teemat phjalikult arutanud pllumajandus-toodetega seotud eiramiste ja vastastikuse abi trhma raames ja on otsustanud esitada Euroopa Parlamendile ja nukogule teise aruande, mis hlmab musta nimekirja mruse phjalikku hindamist ja vimalikke soovituslikke meetmeid.
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements). 
Tabelis 105 esitatud summad (kinnitatud saadaolevad summad, mis ei sltu hestki tingimusest, tpselt kindlaks mratud rahalised summad ning maksmisele kuuluvad saadaolevad summad, mille suhtes ei kohaldata maksethtaega) on EAGGFi majandusaruandes ja ECR andmebaasis asuvates andmetes erinevad (kvartaalselt esitatud eiramiste arv kindla ajavahemiku jooksul, mis vib kesoleval hetkel olla ksnes hinnanguline, kuna andmeid alles tpsustatakse).
The Commission has asked the Member States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide. 
Komisjon on palunud liikmesriikidel viia lbi ECR andmebaasi esialgne koosklastamine tabeliga 105, vttes arvesse, et mlemad andmekogumid ei saa kunagi kattuda.
Until now, the first priority was to improve the quality of the data. 
Seni oli esmathtis andmete kvaliteedi parandamine.
The data in the ECR database has now reached a level of reliability where it will be possible to compare the data. 
Nd on ECR andmebaasi andmed judnud usaldatavuse astmele, kus andmeid on vimalik vrrelda.
Member States should shift in the near future to the electronic format for reporting of irregularities. 
Lhitulevikus peaksid liikmesriigid minema le elektroonilise teadete saatmisele eiramiste kohta.
The Commission is currently assisting Member States in this respect and is also considering an increase of the threshold from EUR 4 000 to 10 000 in order to reduce dataflow and focus on the most important cases. 
Komisjon annab liikmesriikidele praegu sellealast abi ja kaalub ka lve tstmist 4 000 eurolt 10 000 eurole, et vhendada andmete voogu ja keskenduda kige olulisematele juhtumitele.
The Commission has undertaken to bring forward draft proposals to modify Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 to seek to remedy the weaknesses in reporting, recovery and write off of irregular CAP payments. The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities. 
Komisjon on otsustanud esitada ettepanekute eelnud, et muuta nukogu mrust (EM) nr 595/91 ja nukogu mrust (E) nr 1258/1999, et pda parandada aruandluses, sissenudmises ja eeskirju eirates tehtud hise pllumajanduspoliitika maksete kustutamises esinevaid nrku kohti. Komisjon leiab, et OLAFi ja pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi vaheline lesannete jaotus on selgelt mratletud. Vastavalt komisjoni 10. veebruari 1995. aasta teatise SEC(95) 249 2. lisale on OLAF vastutav sissenuete eest eiramiste puhul, millest on teatatud.
Any decision to write off irrecoverable amounts has to be taken by the Commission via the EAGGF clearance-of-accounts procedure that is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, in which OLAF assists throughout its different steps. Finally, regarding the suggested abolition of the black list, the Commission, while sharing the view of the Court that the system does not work well, thinks there is room for improvement of the scheme and would rather see the application of the tool by the Member States being improved, than simply abolished. 
Komisjon peab tegema kik sissenutamatute summade kustutamise otsused EAGGF raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise menetluse raames, mida teostab pllumajanduse peadirektoraat, saades erinevates etappides abi OLAFilt. Seoses musta nimekirja thistamise soovitusega nustub komisjon kontrollikoja seisukohaga, et musta nimekirja ssteem ei toimi hsti, kuid leiab, et knealust kava tuleks tiustada ja selle asemel, et knealune vahend lihtsalt thistada, viksid liikmesriigid parandada selle rakendamist.
There is certainly room for improvement, and the mere existence of the regulation is designed to have a preventive impact which, admittedly, diminishes if not effectively applied. 
Kindlasti on selles osas veel arenguruumi, kuna musta nimekirja mrus on loodud selleks, et sellel oleks eiramisi ennetav mju, mis loomulikult vheneb, kui seda ei rakendata thusalt.
The updated figures are (see paragraph 30): Ń irregularities notified after payment: EUR 2 983 million; Ń amount recovered from claimants: EUR 603 million; Ń amount written off against EAGGF: EUR 153 million; Ń amount charged to Member States: EUR 144 million; Ń amount to be recovered: EUR 2 083 million. 
The updated figures are (see paragraph 30): Ń irregularities notified after payment: EUR 2 983 million; Ń amount recovered from claimants: EUR 603 million; Ń amount written off against EAGGF: EUR 153 million; Ń amount charged to Member States: EUR 144 million; Ń amount to be recovered: EUR 2 083 million.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud. 
4.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud.
The Commission has informed Member States by discussing this problem in meetings as Cocolaf and Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and by publishing the relevant figures in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2). 
The Commission has informed Member States by discussing this problem in meetings as Cocolaf and Working Group ŇIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsÓ and by publishing the relevant figures in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2).
In annual reports and presentations in meetings of Coolaf, Member States have been informed that the reporting time could have an impact on the determination of the negligence of a Member State (see Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud, point 10.5). 
In annual reports and presentations in meetings of Cocolaf, Member States have been informed that the reporting time could have an impact on the determination of the negligence of a Member State (see Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud, point 10.5).
At the same time specific fields relating to ÔInterestŐ and ÔPenaltiesŐ were introduced. 
At the same time specific fields relating to ŇInterestÓ and ŇPenaltiesÓ were introduced.
The Commission is aware of the problem of inconsistencies of definition and coverage in the information supplied and has already remarked on this problem (see Commission 2002 Report on the fight against fraud, paragraph 11.2). 
The Commission is aware of the problem of inconsisten-cies of definition and coverage in the information supplied and has already remarked on this problem (see Commission 2002 Report on the fight against fraud, paragraph 11.2).
In addition, OLAF also informed Member States in several meetings that the non-reporting of the CN code (product description) would hinder the Commission in producing analyses. 
In addition, OLAF also informed Member States in several meetings that the non-reporting of the CN code (product description) would hin-der the Commission in producing analyses.
Cases and communications have been updated during the year 2003 on the basis of: Ń quality checks by OLAF, Ń findings of Member States concerning the data in the ECR database, Ń updates of old cases by Member States, Ń Commission Decision 2003/481/EC, Ń audit findings by the Task Force Recovery, Ń audit findings by the Court of Auditors. 
Cases and communications have been updated during the year 2003 on the basis of: Ń quality checks by OLAF, Ń findings of Member States concerning the data in the ECR database, Ń updates of old cases by Member States, Ń Commission Decision 2003/481/EC, Ń audit findings by the Task Force Recovery, Ń audit findings by the Court of Auditors.
However, it was already mentioned in this Report that the Ôfigures must be handled with great cautionŐ (p. 
However, it was already mentioned in this Report that the Ňfigures must be hand-led with great cautionÓ (p.
41) as Ôthere is no certainty that the total number of communications received represents the total frauds and irregularities detected by Member StatesŐ (p. 
41) as Ňthere is no certainty that the total number of communications received represents the total frauds and irregularities detected by Member StatesÓ (p.
C 269/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account. 
C 269/22 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account.