natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Checks shall at least include: (i) an unannounced check of the processing undertakingŐs stocks, (ii) a check when the tobacco leaves the place in which it was under supervision, having undergone first processing and market preparation (see note 8). 
Kontroll hõlmab: i) töötlemisettevõtte varude etteteatamata kontrolli, ii) kontrolli lehttubaka ärasaatmisel järelevalve alt pärast esmast töötlemist ja pakendamist (vt märkust 8).
Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1636/98 defines Ôfirst processingŐ as the processing of raw tobacco delivered by a producer into a stable, storable product put up in uniform bales of a quality meeting final user (manufacturer) requirements. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 1636/98 artikli 1 punktis 3 määratletakse “esmane töötlemine” kui “tootja tarnitud toortubaka töötlemine stabiilseks ladusta-tavaks tooteks, mis on pakitud ühtlasteks pallideks ja vastab lõppkasutaja (valmistaja) kvaliteedinõuetele”.
Since the 1993 harvest, producer groups can obtain the status of Ôrecognised producer groupsŐ by complying with a number of requirements specified in the provisions of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 84/93. 
1993. aasta saagikoristusest alates saavad tootjarühmad omandada staatuse “tunnustatud tootjarühm”, kui vastavad mitmetele määruse (EMÜ) nr 84/93 artikli 2 lõikes 1 kirjeldatud nõuetele.
From the 1999 harvest the requirements are specified in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98. 
1999. aasta saagikoristusest alates on nõuded sätestatud määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 3 lõikes 1.
According to Article 3(f) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 members of the producer group who wish to withdraw from membership, may do so after they have been members of the group for a minimum of one year following its recognition. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 43 punkti f järgi võivad tootjarühma liikmed, kes soovivad oma liikmestaatusest loobuda, seda teha, kui nad on vähemalt ühe aasta selle rühma liikmed olnud pärast selle rühma tunnustamist.
The provisions of Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 prohibit producer groups from carrying out first processing of tobacco. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 2 lõige 2 keelab tootjarühmadel teostada tubaka esmatöötlemist.
Article 4(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 provides for the granting of specific aid to recognised producer groups, Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 84/93 and Article 40(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 provide the details of the purposes for which specific aid may be used. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2075/92 artikli 4 punktis a sätestatakse eriabi andmine tunnustatud tootjarühmadele, määruse (EMÜ) nr 84/93 artiklis 7 ja määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 40 lõikes 2 täpsustatakse need eesmärgid, milleks eriabi võib kasutada.
In 1995 the Commission (DG VI/E3) issued an interpretative note (No VI/5711/95) to Member States on the use of the specific aid in particular to ensure the effect of additionality of this subsidy. 
1995. aastal avaldas komisjon (peadirektoraat VI/E3) liikmesriikidele tõlgendusdokumendi (nr VI/5711/95) eriabi kasutamise kohta, et tagada eelkõige selle subsiidiumi täiendavus.
According to Article 6(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 recognition of producer groups shall be withdrawn by the Member State concerned if specific aid is used for other than the purposes laid down in Article 40(2). 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 6 lõike 1a järgi tühistab asjaomane liikmesriik tootjarühma tunnustamise, kui eriabi on kasutatud muudel kui artikli 40 lõikes 2 ettenähtud eesmärkidel.
Only recognised producer groups may be paid the specific aid and the variable part of the premium. 
Eriabi ja lisatasu muutuvkomponenti võib maksta üksnes tunnustatud tootjarühmadele.
According to Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92, it is a condition for granting of premiums to producers that leaf tobacco delivered is covered by a cultivation contract with an approved first processor. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2075/92 artikli 5 järgi makstakse tootjatele lisatasu juhul, kui tarnitud lehttubakas on kaetud tunnustatud esmatöötlejaga sõlmitud külvieelse lepinguga.
The contract must be concluded at the latest by 30 May of the year of harvest. 
Leping tuleb sõlmida hiljemalt saagikoristusaasta 30. maiks.
According to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98, where a cultivation contract is concluded between a processor and a producer group, it shall be accompanied by a list containing the names of the producers concerned. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artiklis 11 sätestatakse, et kui külvieelse lepingu sõlmivad töötleja ja tootjarühm, lisatakse lepingule asjaomaste tootjate loetelu.
The provisions of Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 require the competent body to pay the premiums to the producer groups within 30 days of submitting the required documentation. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 18 lõikes 2 nõutakse, et pädev asutus peab lisatasu maksma tootjarühmadele 30 päeva jooksul pärast nõutud dokumentide esitamist.
Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 provides for an arrangement of prior granting of entitlement to first processors to sign cultivation contracts if they comply with certain specific conditions. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2075/92 artikli 6 lõikes 2 sätestatakse esmatöötlejatele külvieelsete lepingute sõlmimiseks õiguse varasema andmise kord, kui nad vastavad teatud konkreetsetele tingimustele.
Cultivation contracts must be signed on 30 May at the latest. 
Külvieelsed lepingud tuleb sõlmida hiljemalt 30. maiks.
According to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 the Member States shall decide on approval of the first processors also taking into account other conditions, which they have laid down themselves. 
Määruse (EÜ) nr 2848/98 artikli 7 järgi otsustavad liikmesriigid esmatöötlejate tunnustamise, võttes arvesse teisi, iseenda sätestatud tingimusi.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/23 Checks carried out (Yes/No): Physical on-the-spot field control On-the-spot control of delivery On-the-spot control of processing No No No Yes (3) Yes (5) No Yes No No Yes (4) Yes Yes No No (6) No No No No No No Dates of control Nature of control 12 to 16.7.1999 22 to 26.1.2001 8.2.2001 8 to 12.9.2003 Conformity audit 20 to 24.9.1999 2 to 6.7.2001 Conformity audit 14 to 18.5.2001 Conformity audit 10 to 14.11.2003 Conformity audit Feoga years covered 1998, 1999 1999, 2000 2002 1998, 1999 1999, 2000 1999, 2000 2002 contracts 2003 Preventive audit (1) (Field control Ń Conformity audit) Conformity audit (2) Preventive audit (Field control Ń Conformity audit) Italy Member State Spain France Greece ANNEX 6 Registration of coverage by the clearance of accounts units of Member States administration and control systems (limited to systems classified by the Commisison as key controls) 1999 to 2003 (1) The objective of preventive audits is to deal with Member StatesŐ questions on the interpretation of the EU legislation. 
17.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 41/23 Läbiviidud kontrollid: Jah/Ei Füüsiline kohapealne põllu kontroll Saadetise kohapealne kontroll Töötlemise kohapealne kontroll Ei Ei Ei Jah (3) Jah Jah (5) Ei Ei Ei Jah (4) Jah Jah Ei Ei (6) Ei Ei Ei Ei Ei Ei Kontrolli kuupäevad Kontrolli laad 12.–16.7.1999 22.–26.1.2001 8.–12.9.2003 8.2.2001 20.–24.9.1999 2.–6.7.2001 Vastavusaudit 14.–18.5.2001 10.–14.11.2003 Vastavusaudit Vastavusaudit Käsitletud aastad 1998, 1999 1999, 2000 2002 1998, 1999 1999, 2000 1999, 2000 2002 lepingud 2003 Ennetav audit (1) (Põllu kontroll — vastavusaudit) Vastavusaudit (2) Vastavusaudit Ennetav audit (Põllu kontroll — vastavusaudit) Itaalia Hispaania Prantsusmaa Kreeka (1) Ennetavate auditite eesmärk on käsitleda liikmesriikide küsimusi ELi õigusaktide tõlgendamise kohta.
(2) The objective of conformity audits is to verify Member StatesŐ compliance with the EU legislation as requested by Regulation (EC) No 1287/95. 
(2) Vastavusauditite eesmärk on kontrollida liikmesriikide vastavust ELi õigusaktidele, sätestatud määrusega (EÜ) nr 1287/95.
(3) The check covered an assessment of irregularities already found by the control CSIA in respect of the 2000 harvest. 
(3) Kontroll hõlmas eeskirjade eiramiste hindamist, mis olid avastatud CSIA teostatud kontrolli käigus 2000. aasta saagikoristuse kohta.
(4) Only in part, Burley parcels had already been harvested rendering, physical control ÔimpossibleŐ. 
(4) Ainult osaliselt, Burley maatükid olid juba koristatud, mis muutis füüsilise kontrolli võimatuks.
(5) The control was limited to the classification of the tobacco delivered and the moisture measurement (6) Considering that the mission report only includes the description Ôvia les tests de corroboration, au travers de lŐexistence de bons dŐapport pour le contrle des livraisonsŐ the control appears to be an ex post control with a limited scope. 
(5) Kontroll piirdus tarnitud tubaka liigitamise ja niiskuse mõõtmisega. (6) Arvestades, et missiooni aruanne sisaldab vaid kirjeldust: “via les tests de corroboration, au travers de l’existence de bons d’apport pour le contrôle des livraisons”, tundub kontroll olevat piiratud ulatusega järelkontroll.
Sources: The mission reports transmitted to the Court and additional information submitted. 
Allikas: Kontrollikojale esitatud missiooni aruanded ja täiendavad andmed.
No C 41/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 ANNEX 7 Key controls additional to those identified by the Commission No 1 2 3 4 Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 Article 46 Article 47(2) Article 48(2)(a) Article 40(2), (2a) and (3) Article 51(2) The control measure On-the-spot checks of parcels in respect of an assessment of the reliability of the quantity of tobacco (the production yield) actually delivered. 
C 41/24 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 17.2.2005 7. LISA Võtmekontrollid lisaks komisjoni poolt kindlaksmääratutele Nr 1 2 3 4 Määrus (EÜ) nr 2848/98 Artikkel 46 Artikli 47 lõige 2 Artikli 48 lõige 2 punkt a Artikli 40 lõiked 2, 2a ja 3 Artikli 51 lõige 2 Kontrollimeede Maatükkide kohapealne inspekteerimine, et hinnata tegelikult tarnitud tubaka (saagi) koguse usaldusväärsust Kaugelasuvate ostukeskuste ja esmatöötlusettevõtte vahelise transpordi kohapealne kontroll Etteteatamata kohapealne kontroll ettevõtte varude esmatöötlemise ja turustamiseks ettevalmistamise käigus Tootjarühmade eriabi kohapealne inspekteerimine
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/25 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The Commission welcomes the report of the Court of Auditors, but has difficulty in endorsing a number of the CourtŐs conclusions. 
17.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 41/25 KOMMENTEERITUD KOKKUVÕTE I. Komisjon tervitab kontrollikoja aruannet, kuid komisjonil on raskusi mõnede koja järelduste jõustamisega.
V. The CommissionŐs proposal for the 1998 reform was based on a report presented in 1996. 
V. Komisjoni ettepanek 1998. aasta reformiks põhines 1996. aastal esitatud aruandel.
This report was based on the most reliable data available at that time, which suffered from some limitations. 
See aruanne põhines tolle aja kõige usal-dusväärsematel kättesaadavatel andmetel, mis olid mõneti piiratud.
The Commission does not consider that its market analysis was affected by this lack of data. 
Komisjon ei leia, et see andmelünk oleks mõjutanud turua-nalüüsi.
The reform did significantly reduce the production of the two lowest quality groups of tobacco, thereby addressing the problem that the qualities grown were not suited for the market demand. 
Reform vähendas märkimisväärselt kahe kõige madalama kvaliteedigrupi tubaka tootmist ning käsitles kasvava kvaliteedi turunõuetele mittevastavuse probleemi.
The alleged anti-competitive behaviour within the tobacco sector is being followed up by the Commission (see also point X). 
Komisjon jälgib väidetavat konkurentsivastast käitumist tubakasektoris (vt ka punkt X).
The CommissionŐs clearance of accounts departments were not inactive as regards tobacco. Based on their own risk analysis, and taking into account certain preliminary remarks of the Court of Auditors, they launched an investigation into tobacco in 2001 (audits in Greece, Italy, France and Germany) plus another three audits in 2003 (Greece, Italy and Spain). 
Komisjoni aruannete kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise talitus ei olnud tubaka küsimuses passiivne ning viis oma riskianalüüsi tulemusena ja kontrollikoja teatavaid eelmärkusi arvesse võttes 2001. aastal läbi tubakauuringu (kontrollimised Kreekas, Itaalias, Prantsusmaal ja Saksamaal), lisaks kolm kontrollimist 2003. aastal (Kreekas, Itaalias ja Hispaanias).
The procedures following the 2001 audits have been finalised for Germany and France. 
2001. aasta kontrollimisele järgnenud protseduurid on Saksamaa ja Prantsusmaa osas lõpetatud.
For some of the other Member States, however, the Commission is aware of some delays and will attempt to finalise its investigations as soon as possible. 
Teatavate teiste liikmesriikide puhul tunnistab komisjon siiski teatavat viivitust ja teeb pingutusi, et lõpetada uurimine nii pea kui võimalik.
The Commission notes the extended list of key controls now proposed by the Court. 
Komisjon võtab arvesse koja poolt pakutud võtmetähtsusega kontrollimiste laiendatud nimekirja.
However, the Commission defined the key controls to be carried out in the tobacco sector in 2001 and is of the opinion that they cover the essential controls laid down in the Regulation. 
Komisjon määras 2001. aastal kindlaks tubakasektoris läbiviidavad võtmetähtsusega kontrollimised ning on arvamusel, et need katavad määrusega ette nähtud põhilise kontrollivajaduse.
The Commission is of the opinion that its monitoring proved satisfactory. 
Komisjon on arvamusel, et komisjoni järelevalvemenet-lus on osutunud küllaldaseks.
Article 26 of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 required the Commission to submit a report on the functioning of the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco to the European Parliament and to the Council before 1 April 2002. 
Vastavalt määruse (EMÜ) nr 2075/92 artiklile 26 pidi komisjon enne 1. aprilli 2002 Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule esitama aruande ühise turukorralduse toimimisest toortubaka sektoris.
The Commission submitted the requested report (1) in November 2002, seven months behind deadline. 
Komisjon edastas nõutud aruande (1) seitsmekuulise viivitusega novembris 2002.
(1) Report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco, SEC(2002) 1183, 6.11.2002. 
(1) Aruanne Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule ühise turukorralduse toimimisest toortubaka sektoris. Dokument SEK(2002) 1183, 6.11.2002.
In the meantime, the Commission had employed an external evaluator to examine the CMO. 
Vahepeal oli komisjon tellinud välishindajalt ühise turukorralduse hindamisuuringu.
This evaluation (2), was available in October 2003. 
See uuring (2) valmis oktoobris 2003.
Furthermore, in preparation for a reform of the raw tobacco sector, the Commission carried out an Extended Impact Assessment (3), which was completed on 23 September 2003. 
Lisaks sellele viis komisjon toortubakasektori reformi ette valmistades läbi laiendatud mõjuhinnangu uuringu, (3) mis jõudis lõpule 23. septembril 2003.
On 22 April 2004 the Council of Agriculture Ministers decided to fundamentally reform the support for the tobacco sector. 
22. aprillil 2004 võttis põllumajandusministrite nõukogu vastu otsuse tubakasektori toetamine põhimõtteliselt ümber korraldada.
The 2004 Reform provides that, from 2010 onwards, tobacco aid will be completely decoupled from production. 
2004. aasta reform näeb ette, et alates 2010. aastast on tubakatoetus tootmisest täielikult lahutatud.
Half of the aid will be transferred to the single farm payment and the remaining half will be used for restructuring tobacco-producing regions under the rural development policy. 
Pool toetusest viiakse üle üksikmajandi toetuse alla ning ülejäänud poolt kasutatakse maaelu arenduspoliitika raames tubakatootmis-piirkondade ümberstruktureerimiseks.
In a four-year transition period, between 2006 and 2009, at least 40 % of the aid will be decoupled and integrated in the single farm payment. 
Nelja-aastase üleminekuperioodi jooksul aastatel 2006−2009 seotakse lahti vähemalt 40 % toetusest ning integreeritakse üksikmajandi toetusse.
Member States may decide to retain up to 60 % as a coupled payment. 
Liikmesriigid võivad otsustada säilitada kuni 60 % seotud toetusena.
The coupled payment has to be granted in such a way as to ensure equal treatment between farmers and/or according to objective criteria such as for tobacco producers situated in Objective I regions or for tobacco farmers producing varieties of a certain quality. 
Seotud toetust tuleb jagada sellisel viisil, et tagatud oleks põllumajandustootjate võrdne kohtlemine ja/või objektiivsete kriteeriumide järgimine nagu toetus tubakatootjatele eesmärgi I piirkondades või toetus teatava kvaliteediga tubakasortide kasvataja-tele.
Further criteria may be considered in the future. 
Edaspidi võib arvesse võtta täiendavaid kriteeriume.
The 2004 reform should in principle resolve all of the present difficulties. 
2004. aasta reform peaks põhimõtteliselt lahendama kõik praegused raskused.
X. The Commission has issued Statements of Objections concerning alleged cartels in the raw tobacco markets in Spain and Italy (in December 2003 and February 2004 respectively). 
X. Komisjon on esitanud vastuväiteid väidetavate kartellide kohta toortubakaturgudel Hispaanias ja Itaalias (vastavalt detsembris 2003 ja veebruaris 2004).
These Statements of Objections contain the preliminary conclusions of the CommissionŐs investigations on alleged anti-competitive behaviour by producer groups and processors in the two Member States which started in October 2001 and January 2002 respectively. 
Need vastuväited sisaldavad esialgseid järeldusi kahe liikmesriigi tootjagruppide ning töötlejate väidetavalt konkurentsivastase käitumise komisjonipoolsetest uuringutest, mis algasid vastavalt oktoobris 2001 ja jaanuaris 2002.
Issuing a statement of objections is a preliminary step in the procedure that may lead to the adoption of a prohibition decision imposing fines on the companies concerned. 
Vastuväidete esitamine on ettevalmistav etapp menetlusele, mis võib viia keelustamisotsuse vastuvõtmiseni ning asjaomaste äriühingute trahvimiseni.
As regards possible financial corrections the Commission refers to the ongoing clearance of accounts procedure following the 2001 and 2003 audits. 
Võimalike finantskorrektuuride osas viitab komisjon käimasolevale aruannete kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise menetlusele, mis on 2001. ja 2003. aasta kontrollimiste järg.
(2) Evaluationofthecommonorganisationofthemarketinrawtobacco, COGEA, 2003. Rome. 
COGEA, 2003. Rooma.
220 pp. (3) Tobacco sector, Extended Impact Assessment, COM(2003) 554 final, SEC(2003) 1023. 
(3) Tubakasektor, laiendatud mõjuhinnangu uuring. KOM(2003) 554 lõplik, SEK(2003) 1023.
C 41/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 PREPARATION FOR THE 1998 REFORM 21. to 23. 
C 41/26 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 17.2.2005 PREPARATION FOR THE 1998 REFORM 21. to 23.
The Eurostat figure is 126070 annual working units, corresponding to 212 960 people as the share of seasonal and part-time employment is remarkably high. 
The Eurostat figure is 126 070 annual working units, corresponding to 212 960 people as the share of seasonal and part-time employment is remar-kably high.
The majority of the agricultural population in such specialised regions is occupied in production, first processing, transport or supply of materials involved in the production of this crop. 
The majority of the agricultural population in such specialised regions is occupied in production, first proces-sing, transport or supply of materials involved in the production of this crop.
The evaluation study used quantitative parameters (% tobacco farms over total farms versus % tobacco area over total agricultural area) to describe the degree of specialisation of tobacco-producing regions (3), thus providing evidence for tobacco productionŐs importance in relation to other crops. 
The evaluation study used quantitative parameters (% tobacco farms over total farms versus % tobacco area over total agricultural area) to describe the degree of specialisation of tobacco-producing regions (3), thus providing evidence for tobacco production’s importance in relation to other crops.
The Commission took account of the fact that price is affected by supply (production, import, stocks) and demand (consumption, export) as well as exchange rates. 
The Commission took account of the fact that price is affected by supply (production, import, stocks) and demand (con-sumption, export) as well as exchange rates.
The post-1998 CMO took into account the concentration of purchasing by a limited number of multinational first processors, merchants and manufacturers and their more important role in price setting. 
The post-1998 CMO took into account the concentration of purchasing by a limited number of multinational first processors, merchants and manufacturers and their more important role in price setting.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/27 33. 
17.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 41/27 33.
The CommissionŐs 1993 prohibition on producer groups from carrying out first processing aimed to separate the functions of producer (organisation) and first processor in order to avoid conflicts of interests between the two parties. 
The Commission’s 1993 prohibition on producer groups from carrying out first processing aimed to separate the functions of producer (organisation) and first processor in order to avoid conflicts of interests between the two parties.
The recently adopted reform of (1) Report from the Commission to the Council on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco (COM(96) 554 final, 18.12.1996). the tobacco CMO should alleviate any potential distorting effect of the present scheme as, when it is fully implemented, there will be no link between the aid and production. 
The recently adopted reform of the tobacco CMO should alleviate any potential distorting (1) Report from the Commission to the Council on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco (COM(96) 554 final, 18.12.1996). effect of the present scheme as, when it is fully implemented, there will be no link between the aid and production.
As total EU production is limited by quantitative thresholds, the total production area has considerably decreased as a result of the higher yields. 
As total EU production is limited by quantitative thres-holds, the total production area has considerably decreased as a result of the higher yields.
From a solely environmental point of view it would have been desirable to have a system with area references (limitations) rather than quantitative thresholds. 
From a solely environmental point of view it would have been de-sirable to have a system with area references (limitations) rather than quantitative thresholds.
At the Gothenburg European Council in 2001, the Commission proposed reorienting support from the CAP to reward Ôhealthy, high-quality products and practices rather than quantityŐ (see COM (2001) 264 final). 
At the Gothenburg European Council in 2001, the Commission proposed reorienting support from the CAP to reward ‘healthy, high-quality products and practices rather than quantity’ (see COM (2001) 264 final).
C 41/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 39. 
C 41/28 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 17.2.2005 39.
In order to measure the impact the Commission used the term Ôfair incomeŐ as in the Treaty, set as a quantifiable target an overall improvement in price (and quality), and used information on production costs and income (1), available from the FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network). 
In order to measure the impact the Commission used the term ‘fair income’ as in the Treaty, set as a quantifiable target an overall improvement in price (and quality), and used information on production costs and income (1), available from the FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network).
The impact of premiums on growersŐ income was evaluated in the 2003 extended impact assessment. 
The impact of premiums on gro-wers’ income was evaluated in the 2003 extended impact assessment.