natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We consider that, while positive steps have been taken to improve the management and control of the ITER project construction phase, there remains a risk of further cost increases and delays in project implementation. 
Kontrollikoda on seisukohal, et hoolimata ITERi ehitusetapi juhtimisel ja kontrollimisel tehtud edusammudest psib oht, et projekti elluviimise kulud vivad endiselt kasvada ja selle lpuleviimine vib veelgi edasi lkkuda.
Other comments 20. 
Muud kommentaarid 20.
Without calling our opinions into question, we made various comments in our specific annual reports on the JUs, in order to highlight matters of importance and indicate areas for improvement related to budgetary and financial management, internal controls, leverage of contributions, and evaluations by the Commission. 
Ilma oma auditiarvamusi kahtluse alla seadmata esitas kontrollikoda iga-aastastes eriaruannetes hisettevtete kohta mitmeid kommentaare, milles rhutatakse olulisi ksimusi ja osutatakse parandamist vajavatele valdkondadele, mis on seotud eelarve haldamise ja finantsjuhtimise, sisekontrolli, toetuse vimendamise ja komisjoni tehtud hindamistega.
Shortcomings in the budget planning for payment appropriations 21. 
Puudused maksete assigneeringute eelarve planeerimises 21.
F4E had to increase significantly the 2017 payment appropriations planned in the initial budget (by around 284 million euro or 52 %) to cover its actual payment needs in 2017. 
F4E pidi esialgses eelarves kavandatud 2017. aasta maksete assigneeringuid mrkimisvrselt suurendama (ligikaudu 284 miljonit eurot ehk 52%), et oma tegelikke maksevajadusi katta.
This situation was due to serious shortcomings in the JUŐs budget planning process and affected the JUŐs 2018 budget. 
Selline olukord oli tingitud hisettevtte eelarve planeerimise tsistest puudustest ning see mjutas hisettevtte 2018. aasta eelarvet.
In two cases (SESAR, IMI), the implementation rate for payment appropriations in 2017 was significantly lower than expected. 
Kahel juhul (SESAR, IMI) oli maksete assigneeringute kasutusmr 2017. aastal oodatust oluliselt viksem.
For SESAR this was mainly due to delays in concluding Horizon 2020 grant agreements and the non-consideration of important assigned revenue stemming from recoveries for closed FP7 projects. 
SESARi puhul tulenes see peamiselt viivitustest programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň toetuslepingute slmimisel ja seitsmenda raamprogrammi lpetatud projektide tagasinutud summadest tuleneva olulise sihtotstarbelise tulu mittearvestamisest.
For IMI, the low rate of budget implementation was mainly linked to a reduction and postponement of clinical trials within some large projects, and to delays in concluding grant agreements for closed calls under Horizon 2020. 
IMI puhul oli madal eelarve titmise mr peamiselt seotud kliiniliste uuringute vhendamise ja edasilkkamisega mningate suurte projektide raames, samuti viivitustega programmi 7 CH4105458ET02-18PP-CH294-18FIN-RAS-Summary_report_JUs_2017-TR.docx 2.10.2018
The fact that the JUs may re-enter unused payment appropriations from previous years into the budget of the next three years, together with a heavy budget planning process, has an increasingly negative impact on the JUsŐ budget implementation rates for payments. 7 
Asjaolu, et hisettevtted vivad eelmiste aastate kasutamata jnud maksete assigneeringud jrgmise kolme aasta eelarvesse lisada, koos keerulise eelarve planeerimise protsessiga avaldab hisettevtete eelarve maksete kasutusmradele ha suuremat negatiivset mju.
8 Closing of the FP7 programme: JUs achieved an average implementation level of 87 % 23. 
Seitsmenda raamprogrammi lpetamine: hisettevtete keskmine eelarve titmise mr oli 87% 23.
We reported on the JUsŐ multi-annual budgetary implementation of the FP7 and TEN-T programmes (SESAR, CS, IMI, FCH, ECSEL). 
Kontrollikoda uuris, kuidas titsid hisettevtted seitsmenda raamprogrammi ja TEN-T programmide mitmeaastast eelarvet (SESAR, Clean Sky, IMI, FCH, ECSEL).
Regarding the five JUs implementing FP7 activities (SESAR, CS, IMI, FCH, ECSEL), at the end of 2017 (closing phase of the FP7 programme), the EU had made actual total cash contributions to them of 3,1 billion euro out of the agreed maximum cash contributions of 3,6 billion euro. 
EL oli 2017. aasta lpus (seitsmenda raamprogrammi lpetamise etapp) teinud viiele hisettevttele, mis seitsmenda raamprogrammi tegevusi elu viivad (SESAR, Clean Sky, IMI, FCH, ECSEL), kokku 3,1 miljardi euro ulatuses rahalisi sissemakseid kokkulepitud 3,6 miljardi euro suurusest maksimumsummast.
This shows that these JUs had achieved an average implementation level for their FP7 activities of about 87 %. 
See nitab, et nende hisettevtete poolne seitsmenda raamprogrammi eelarve titmise mr oli keskmiselt 87%.
We reported on the JUsŐ multi-annual budgetary implementation of the Horizon 2020 programme. 
Kontrollikoda uuris, kuidas titsid hisettevtted programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň mitmeaastast eelarvet.
Regarding the seven JUs implementing Horizon 2020 activities (SESAR, CS, IMI, FCH, ECSEL, BBI, S2R), at the end of 2017 (mid-term of the Horizon 2020 programme), the EU actually contributed in cash 1,6 billion euro of the agreed total maximum EU cash contributions to all JUs implementing Horizon 2020 programme of 7,2 billion euro. 
EL oli 2017. aasta lpus (programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň keskpaik) teinud seitsmele hisettevttele, mis programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň tegevusi elu viivad (SESAR, Clean Sky, IMI, FCH, ECSEL, BPT, S2R), kokku 1,6 miljardi euro ulatuses rahalisi sissemakseid 7,2 miljardi euro suurusest kokkulepitud maksimumsummast, mis on meldud kigile programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň rakendavatele hisettevtetele.
This shows that these JUs currently achieved an average implementation level for their Horizon 2020 activities of about 23 %. 
See nitab, et nende hisettevtete poolne programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň eelarve titmise mr oli keskmiselt 23%.
The current implementation level for Horizon 2020 activities was lower for IMI (11 %) mainly caused by the long time required by project consortia to conclude Horizon 2020 grant agreements, and for BBI (15 %). 
Programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň eelarve titmise mr oli madalam IMI puhul (11%), mis tulenes peamiselt projektikonsortsiumidel programmi toetuslepingute slmimiseks kulunud pikast ajast, samuti BPT puhul (15%).
In-kind contributions to additional activities outside the JU work programme represented the largest part of the contributions from private members 27. 
Mitterahaline toetus lisategevustele vljaspool hisettevtte tkava moodustas suurima osa erasektori liikmete toetusest 27.
By the end of 2017, the industry and research partners of the seven JUs implementing Horizon 2020 activities have actually contributed 2,9 billion euro or 39 % percent of the agreed total contributions of 7,5 billion euro. 
2017. aasta lpuks olid seitsme programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň rakendava hisettevtte tstusharu ja teadusasutusi esindavad partnerid tegelikult eraldanud 2,9 miljardit eurot ehk 39% kokkulepitud 7,5 miljardi euro suurusest kogutoetusest.
This amount is composed of 1 billion euro2 of in-kind contributions to the JUsŐ Horizon 2020 own operational activities (34 %) and of 2 Out of this amount only about 0,2 billion euro (20 %) were certified at the end of 2017. 
See summa koosneb 1 miljardi euro2 suurusest mitterahalisest toetusest hisettevtete programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň phitegevusele (34%) ja 1,9 miljardi euro suurusest rahalisest toetusest hisettevtete tkavast vljapoole jvatele lisategevustele (66%).
Despite of their importance, there is, however, no obligation to disclose the in-kind contributions to additional activities in the annual accounts and we have no mandate to audit them. 
Lisategevustesse investeeritud mitterahalist toetust ei pea hoolimata selle thtsusest raamatupidamise aastaaruannetes avalikustama ning kontrollikojal puudub volitus selle auditeerimiseks.
Consequently, we cannot provide an opinion on their nature, quality and quantity (CS, FCH, BBI, S2R). 
Sellest tulenevalt ei saa me esitada arvamust mitterahalise toetuse olemuse, kvaliteedi ja kvantiteedi kohta (Clean Sky, FCH, BPT, S2R).
Regarding BBI, the Commission initiated in February 2017 an amendment of the BBI founding regulation in view to enable industry members also to provide their cash contributions at project level. 
BPT puhul algatas komisjon 2017. aasta veebruaris selle asutamismruse muutmise, et vimaldada tstusharu esindavatel liikmetel anda rahalist toetust ka projekti tasandil.
However, there is a high risk that the industry members will not achieve the minimum amount of operational cash contributions (182,5 million euro) by the end of the programme. 
On aga suur oht, et tstusharu esindavad liikmed ei suuda hisettevtte tegevuskulude katmiseks enne BPT programmi lppemist eraldada kohustuslikku minimaalset rahalist osalust (182,5 miljonit eurot).
Further information on multiannual budgetary implementation may be found in the JUsŐ 2017 annual activity report. 
Rohkem teavet eelarve mitmeaastase titmise kohta leiab hisettevtete 2017. aasta tegevusaruandest.
All JUs effectively used these key controls for assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying payment transactions. 
kasutasid knealuseid phikontrolle maksetehingute seaduslikkuse ja korrektsuse hindamiseks.
For FP7 grant payments, all the Joint Undertakings (except ECSEL) calculated and reported residual error rates below 2 % based on the ex-post audit results at the end of 2017. 
Seitsmenda raamprogrammi toetusmaksete jrelauditite tulemuste phjal (2017. aasta lpu seisuga) olid kigi hisettevtete (v.a ECSEL) arvutatud ja esitatud allesjnud veamrad madalamad kui 2%.
This was confirmed by our own substantive testing and the reviews of the work of the external audit firms. 
Seda kinnitas ka kontrollikoja tehtud substantiivne testimine ja sltumatute audiitorhingute t levaatamine.
For Horizon 2020 grant payments, only three out of the seven JUs implementing Horizon 2020 projects (CS, IMI, and SESAR) could calculate and report an error rate based on sufficient ex-post audits completed by CAS. 
Programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň toetusmaksete puhul sai ksnes kolm seitsmest programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň projekte rakendavast hisettevttest (Clean Sky, IMI ja SESAR) arvutada ja esitada veamra hise audititeenistuse piisavate jrelauditite alusel.
For SESAR, the residual error rate for Horizon 2020 payments was 2,8 %. 
SESARi puhul oli programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň maksete allesjnud veamr 2,8%.
However, taking into account the rather low amount of total 9 Horizon 2020 payments compared to the total amount of SESAR payments in 2017, the overall residual error rate remained below materiality. 
Vttes aga arvesse, et kigi programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň maksete summa oli suhteliselt vike vrreldes SESARi 2017. aasta maksete kogusummaga, ji ldine allesjnud veamr alla olulisuse piirmra.
33. The remaining JUs (FCH, ECSEL, S2R, BBI) will have first ex-post audit results in 2018 as in 2017 their Horizon 2020 projects were still in an early implementation phase and their operational Horizon 2020 payments in 2017 were mainly pre-financings. 
33. lejnud hisettevtted (FCH, ECSEL, S2R, BPT) saavad esimesed jrelauditi tulemused 2018. aastal, sest 2017. aastal olid nende programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň projektid veel varases rakendusetapis ja nende programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň 2017. aasta tegevuskulude maksed olid peamiselt eelmaksed.
Weaknesses remain in the internal control and monitoring framework, procurement, grant and recruitment procedures 34. 
Sisekontrolli-ja jrelevalveraamistikus ning hanke-, toetuse andmise ja vrbamismenetlustes esineb jtkuvalt puudusi 34.
At the end of 2017, the Commission's common Horizon 2020 grant management and monitoring tools had not yet provided the specific developments needed for the processing of JUsŐ in kind contributions. 
2017. aasta lpuks ei olnud komisjoni hised programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň toetuste haldus-ja seirevahendid sellisel mral vlja arendatud, et vimaldada hisettevtetele eraldatud mitterahalise toetuse haldamist.
This affected the internal control and monitoring framework of four JUs (CS, IMI, SESAR, S2R). 
See mjutas nelja hisettevtte (Clean Sky, IMI, SESAR, S2R) sisekontrolli-ja jrelevalveraamistikku.
Several shortcomings in the application of the internal control standards were found in ECSEL, SESAR, and F4E. 
Sisekontrollistandardite rakendamisel esines mitmeid puudusi ECSELis, SESARis ja F4Es.
In ECSEL, the register of exception was not properly maintained. 
ECSELis ei hallatud korrakohaselt erandite registrit.
In SESAR, the departure of key staff and the subsequent work overload in the finance department caused financial control shortcomings. 
SESARis phjustas finantsvaldkonna vtmettajate lahkumine ning sellest tulenev finantsosakonna t lekoormatus finantskontrolli puudujke.
In F4E, significant shortcomings were found in the internal control and monitoring procedures related to the recruitment of a key management staff, follow-up on managementŐs declarations on interests, as well as internal communication strategies which could not ensure the dissemination of appropriate financial information relevant for the annual accounts. 
F4Es leiti olulisi puudusi peamiste juhtivttajate vrbamisega seotud sisekontrolli-ja jrelevalvemenetlustes, juhtkonna huvide deklaratsioonide 10 CH4105458ET02-18PP-CH294-18FIN-RAS-Summary_report_JUs_2017-TR.docx 2.10.2018 jrelkontrollis ja sisekommunikatsioonistrateegias, mis ei suutnud taganud raamatupidamise aastaaruande seisukohast asjakohase finantsteabe levitamist.
For three JUs (ECSEL, S2R, SESAR) some shortcomings were found in the management of 2017 procurement procedures. 
Kolme ettevtte (ECSEL, S2R ja SESAR) puhul leiti mningaid puudusi 2017. aasta hankemenetluste haldamises.
For BBI weaknesses were found in the design and management of the 2016 grant call for proposals resulting in a low coverage (50 %) for the call topics in the area of research and innovation actions (RIA). 
BPT puhul leiti puudusi 2016. aasta projektikonkursi kavandamises ja haldamises, mistttu said vhe toetust teadusuuringute ja innovatsioonimeetmete teemad (50%).
For a reasonable level of leverage, the minimum contributions from private members to the JUŐs activities should at least match the EUŐs cash contribution. 
Finantsvimenduse mistliku taseme saavutamiseks peaks erasektori liikmete minimaalne osalus hisettevtte tegevuses olema vhemalt vrdvrne ELi rahalise toetusega.
Annex II gives an overview of the minimum leverage ratios for the seven JUs implementing Horizon 2020 activities. 
II lisas antakse levaade seitsme programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň tegevusi ellu viiva hisettevtte minimaalse finantsvimenduse mrast.
In the case of three JUs (CS, FCH, BBI) the founding regulation does not oblige private members to make a minimum of in-kind contributions to the operational activities of the JU. 
Kolme hisettevtte (Clean Sky, FCH, BPT) puhul ei panda asutamismrusega erasektori liikmetele kohustust minimaalseks mitterahaliseks osaluseks hisettevtte phitegevuses.
The CommissionŐs evaluations and the JUsŐ related action plans 40. 
Komisjoni hindamised ja hisettevtete vastavad tegevuskavad 40.
In 2017, the Commission completed the final statutory evaluations of the JUs set up under the FP7 programme (SESAR, IMI, FCH, CS, ARTEMIS and ENIAC) and the interim statutory evaluations of the JUs set up under Horizon 2020 ( SESAR, IMI2, CS2, FCH2, ECSEL, S2R, BBI). 
2017. aastal viis komisjon lpule seitsmenda raamprogrammiga asutatud hisettevtete (SESAR, IMI, FCH, Clean Sky, ARTEMIS ja ENIAC) kohustuslikud lpphindamised ning programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň raames asutatud hisettevtete (SESAR, IMI2, Clean Sky 2, FCH2, ECSEL, S2R, BPT) kohustuslikud vahehindamised.
The evaluations were carried out with the assistance of independent experts and covered their performance in terms of relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, coherence, and EU added value, with additional consideration of openness and transparency and research quality. 
Hindamised viidi lbi sltumatute ekspertide abiga ja need hlmasid hisettevtete t asjakohasust, thusust, tulemuslikkust, sidusust ja ELi lisavrtust, prates tiendavalt thelepanu avatusele, lbipaistvusele ja teadustegevuse kvaliteedile.
In October 2017, the Commission informed the European Parliament and Council on the evaluation results. 
2017. aasta oktoobris teavitas komisjon hindamistulemustest Euroopa Parlamenti ja nukogu.
Whilst the evaluators considered the JUsŐ performance in general as positive, they recommended: to increase the participation of industry, Member States, SMEs and other stakeholders; to improve the coordination with other EU and National Research Programmes; to increase the participation of the new Member States; to further develop an accountable Performance Measurement Framework with key performance indicators to Minimum leverage ratio = total of minimum contributions of the private member as defined in the JUŐs founding regulation / maximum EU cash contribution to the JU as defined in the JUŐs founding regulation 11 3 
Hindajad leidsid, et hisettevtete tulemuslikkus oli ldiselt hea, kuid soovitasid jrgmist: suurendada tstusharude esindajate, liikmesriikide, VKEde ja muude sidusrhmade osalust; parandada koordineerimist teiste ELi ja riiklike teadusprogrammidega; arendada edasi usaldusvrset tulemuslikkuse mtmise raamistikku koos peamiste tulemusnitajatega, mille abil paremini hinnata hisettevtete mju ja sotsiaalmajanduslikku kasu; parandada hisettevtete projektide tulemuste levitamist ja kasutamist.
In response, each JU prepared an action plan and started to implement it in 2018. 
Vastuseks koostas iga hisettevte tegevuskava ja alustas selle rakendamist 2018. aastal.
During its 2018 financial audit, the ECA will follow-up the implementation of the JUsŐ action plans. 
Oma 2018. aasta finantsauditis kontrollib kontrollikoda hisettevtete tegevuskavade rakendamist.
In most cases, the JUs took corrective actions to follow-up to comments made in our specific annual reports of previous years. 
Eelmiste aastate kommentaaride phjal vetud meetmed 44.
Implementation of previous yearsŐ comments is still ongoing in ECSEL and F4E. 12 
ECSELis ja F4Es on parandusmeetmete vtmine veel pooleli.
1 Annex I Joint Undertakings' activities, budget and staff JOINT UNDERTAKING Final Budget (million euro) Staff (employed year end) Parent DG Policy Area Main Activity 2017 2016 2017 2016 BBI DG RTD Research Bio-based products and biofuels research and development 92 66 20 20 CLEAN SKY DG RTD Research Aeronautical technologies research and development 244 288 41 41 ECSEL DG CONNECT Research Electronic components and system research and innovation 290 244 29 29 F4E - FUSION FOR ENERGY DG ENER Research Nuclear fusion energy research and devel opment 865 720 447 415 FCH - FUEL CELLS AND HYDROGEN DG RTD Research Fuel cells and hydrogen research and devel opment 199 116 26 26 IMI - INNOVATIVE MEDICINES INITIATIVE DG RTD Research Pharmaceutical research and development of innovate medicines 206 209 49 41 SESAR DG MOVE Research Air traffic management system research and development 192 157 40 44 S2R-SHIFT2RAIL DG MOVE Research Railway sector research and devel opment 44 52 19 17 Total 2131 1852 671 633 
1 I lisa hisettevtete tegevusvaldkonnad, eelarve ja ttajate arv HISETTEVÍTE Lplik eelarve (miljonites eurodes) Ttajate arv (aasta lpu seisuga) Vastutav peadirektoraat Poliitikavaldkond Peamine tegevusvaldkond 2017 2016 2017 2016 BPT Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Bioressursiphiste toodete ja bioktuste teadus-ja arendustegevus 92 66 20 20 CLEAN SKY Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Lennundustehnoloogiate teadus-ja arendustegevus 244 288 41 41 ECSEL Sidevrkude, sisu ja tehnoloogia peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Elektroonikakomponentide ja -ssteemide teadus-ja arendustegevus 290 244 29 29 F4E Đ FUSION FOR EN ERGY Energeetika peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Tuumasnteesienergia teadus-ja arendustegevus 865 720 447 415 FCH Đ FUEL CELLS AND HYDROGEN Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Ktuseelementide ja vesiniku valdkonna teadus-ja arendustegevus 199 116 26 26 IMI Đ INNOVATIVE MEDICINES INITIATIVE DG RTD Teadusuuringud Farmaatsiaalane teadustegevus ja innovatiivsete ravimite vljattamine 206 209 49 41 SESAR Liikuvuse ja transpordi peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Lennuliikluse juhtimisssteemi teadus-ja arendustegevus 192 157 40 44 S2R Đ SHIFT2RAIL Liikuvuse ja transpordi peadirektoraat Teadusuuringud Raudteesektori teadus-ja arendustegevus 44 52 19 17 Kokku 2 131 1 852 671 633 CH4105458ET02-18PP-CH294-18FIN-RAS-Summary_report_JUs_2017-TR.docx 2.10.2018
EN 15.12.2009 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C304/71 REPORT on the annual accounts of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2008, together with the Agency’s replies (2009/C 304/14) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... . 
KINNITAV AVALDUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ... .
COMMENTS ON THE BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
TÄHELEPANEKUD EELARVE HALDAMISE JA FINANTSJUHTIMISE KOHTA . . . . .
Table. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Tabel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paragraph Page 1-2 72 3-12 72 13 73 14 73 . .. .. ... .. 
Punktid Lk 1–2 72 3–12 72 13 73 14 73 . .. .. ... ..
76 EN C 304/72 Official Journal of the European Union 15.12.2009 whether due to fraud or error, and for ensuring that the transactions underlying those accounts are legal and regular. 
76 ET C 304/72 Euroopa Liidu Teataja 15.12.2009 samuti on direktori ülesanne tagada, et mainitud aruande aluseks olevad tehingud on seaduslikud ja korrektsed.
TheCourt’sresponsibilityistoprovide,onthebasisof its audit, a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of the Agency and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them. 
Kontrollikojakohustuseksonesitadaomaauditipõhjal kinnitav avaldus rakendusameti raamatupidamise aasta­ aruande usaldusväärsuse ja selle aluseks olevate tehingute seaduslikkuse ja korrektsuse kohta.
TheCourtconducteditsauditinaccordancewiththe IFAC and ISSAI (11) International Auditing Standards and Codes of Ethics. 
Kontrollikoda viis auditi läbi kooskõlas IFAC ja ISSAI (11) rahvusvaheliste auditistandardite ja eetikanormi­ dega.
In making those risk assessments internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and presentation of accounts is considered in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. 
Asjakohaste auditimenetluste kavandamiseks võetakse arvesse asutuse raamatupidamise aastaaruande koostamise ja esitamisega seonduvat sisekontrollisüsteemi.
In the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s Annual Accounts (12) present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation. 
Kontrollikojahinnangulannabrakendusametiraama­ tupidamise aastaaruanne (12) kõigis olulistes aspektides tõepä­ rase pildi rakendusameti finantsolukorrast 31. detsembri 2008. aasta seisuga ning rakendusameti tehingutest ja raha­ voogudest lõppenud aastal vastavalt rakendusameti finants­ määruse sätetele.
TheExecutiveAgencyfortheTrans-EuropeanTransport Network (hereinafter ‘the Agency’), located in Brussels, was set up by the Commission Decision 2007/60/EC of 26 October 2006 (1) and amended by the Commission Decision 2008/593/EC (2). 
BrüsselisasuvÜleeuroopaliseTranspordivõrguRakendus­ amet (edaspidi „rakendusamet”) loodi komisjoni 26. oktoobri 2006. aasta otsusega 2007/60/EÜ, (1) mida muudeti komisjoni otsusega 2008/593/EÜ (2).