natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The computerised databases containing the cattle records were originally set up for veterinary purposes (2), but are also used by premium managers to carry out administrative checks in the (1) Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (OJ L 204, 11.8.2000, p. 
Veiste kohta koostatud elektroonilisi andmebaase, mis loodi veterinaareesmrkidel, (2) kasutavad htse haldus-ja kontrolli-(1) Euroopa Parlamendi ja nukogu 17. juuli 2000. aasta mrus (E) nr 1760/2000 veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi loomise, veiseliha ja veiselihatoodete mrgistamise ning nukogu mruse (E) nr 820/97 kehtetuks tunnistamise kohta (ET L 204, 11.8.2000, lk 1).
(2) The preamble to Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997 p. 
(2) 21. aprilli 1997. aasta mruse (E) nr 820/97 (veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi loomise ning veiseliha ja veiselihatoodete mrgistamise kohta) phjendustes on mrgitud, et Ňvttes arvesse, et nukogu 26. juuni 1990. aasta direktiivi 90/425/EM hendusesiseses kaubanduses teatavate elusloomade ja toodete suhtes kohaldatava veterinaar-ja zootehnilise kontrolli kohta seoses siseturu vljakujundamisega artikli 3 like 1 punktis c on stestatud, et hendusesisese kaubandusega hlmatud loomad tuleb identifitseerida vastavalt henduse eeskirjadele ja registreerida viisil, mis vimaldab tuvastada pritolu-ja vahemajandi, -keskuse vi -organisatsiooniÓ (ET L 117, 7.5.1997, lk 1). ssteemi (SIGC) (3) raames teostatavas halduskontrollis ka toetuste haldajad.
The CourtŐs audit 4. 
(4) Kontrollikoja audit 4.
The Court has examined cattle identification and registration on various occasions (5). 
Kontrollikoda on veiste identifitseerimist ja registreerimist vaadelnud mitmel korral.
The observations made on the basis of these previous audits confirm that the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals is an essential part of a whole complex of control systems and that shortcomings exist in relation to the approval, management and content of the cattle identification and registration databases. 
(5) Eelnevate auditite kigus tehtud mrkused nitavad, et veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteem on kontrollissteemide heks oluliseks elemendiks ning et veiste identifitseerimiseks ja registreerimiseks kasutatavate andmebaaside kinnitamise, halduse ja sisu osas esineb puudusi.
The objective of the audit was to examine the design of the cattle identification and registration system introduced at European Union level (see paragraphs 33 to 46) and to analyse the controls and follow-up carried out by the Commission to verify that the system has been implemented correctly in the various Member States (see paragraphs 47 to 77). 
Auditi eesmrgiks oli uurida Euroopa Liidu tasandil sisseseatud veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi lesehitust (vt punktid 33Đ46) ning analsida komisjoni tehtud kontrollija jrelevalvetoiminguid, selleks et veenduda ssteemi asjakohases rakendamises erinevates liikmesriikides (vt punktid 47Đ77).
The audit also aimed to verify that an effective system for identifying and registering cattle had indeed been established and to evaluate whether, in terms of the underlying principles and implementing rules, the regulations setting up the system made it possible to achieve the prescribed objectives. 
Auditi eesmrgiks oli samuti kontrollida, kas efektiivne veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteem on loodud, ning hinnata, kas ssteemi ksitlevad igusaktid vimaldavad pstitatud eesmrkide saavutamist nii alusphimtete kui ka rakenduseeskirjade osas.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 820/97 states, ÔWhereas the management of certain Community aid schemes in the field of agriculture requires the individual identification of certain types of livestock; whereas the identification and registration systems must, therefore, be suitable for the application and control of such measures; whereas it is necessary to ensure the rapid and efficient exchange of information between Member States for the correct application of this RegulationŐ. 
(3) 21. aprilli 1997. aasta mrus (E) nr 820/97: Ňvttes arvesse, et teatavad henduse pllumajanduse valdkonnas rakendatavad toetusmeetmed nuavad teatavate koduloomade individuaalset identifitsee-rimist; et identifitseerimis-ja registreerimisssteemid peavad seetttu vimaldama nende toetusmeetmete rakendamist ja kontrollimist; vttes arvesse, et kesoleva mruse rakendamiseks tuleb tagada teabe kiire ja efektiivne vahetamine liikmesriikide vahelÓ.
(4) Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 of 11 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 (OJ L 327, 12.12.2001, p. 
(4) Komisjoni 11. detsembri 2001. aasta mruse (E) nr 2419/2001 (millega stestatakse henduse teatavate toetuskavade htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi ksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad) artikkel 16 (ET L 327, 12.12.2001, lk 11).
(5) Special Report No 4/2001 on the implementation of the integrated administration and control system (OJ C 214, 31.7.2001, p. 
(5) Eriaruanne nr 4/2001 htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi kohta (ET C 214, 31.7.2001) ja eriaruanne nr 14/2001 kontrollikoja eriaruande nr 19/98 veiste spongioosse entsefalopaatia kohta teostatava jrelevalve kohta (ET C 324, 20.11.2001, lk 1).
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/5 6. 
4.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 29/5 6.
The audit also evaluated the level of the systemŐs development in four Member States, namely Germany (Bavaria and Saxony), France, Italy and the United Kingdom (Great Britain) (see paragraphs 78 to 91). 
Auditi kigus anti samuti hinnang ssteemi arengutaseme-le neljas liikmesriigis, milleks on Saksamaa (Baieri ja Saksi liidu-maad), Prantsusmaa, Itaalia ja hendkuningriik (Suurbritannia) (vt punktid 78Đ91).
The aim was to examine the implementation of the system by checking that the proposed system ensures that cattle are traceable on the European level, thus making it possible for all movements of cattle to be tracked from birth or importation from a third country through to slaughter or export from the European Union. 
Eesmrgiks oli jlgida ssteemi rakendamist ja kontrollida, kas ssteem tagab loomade liikumiste jlgitavuse Euroopa tasandil alates nende snnist vi kolmandast riigist im-portimisest kuni looma tapmiseni vi ekspordini vljapoole Euroopa Liitu.
In 2002, 64 % of the EU bovine herd was to be found in the four Member States visited and they received almost 59 % of bovine premiums. 
Nimetatud nelja liikmesriigi omanduses oli 2002. aastal 64 % EL-i veistest ning nende osaks langes ligi 59 % eraldatud lisatasudest.
The audit also took into consideration the CommissionŐs work and, in particular, the reports on inspections in the Member States. 
Auditi kigus veti samuti arvesse komisjoni td, eesktt liikmesriikide inspekteerimise phjal koostatud aruandeid.
According to the survey carried out by Eurostat, there were 81,1 million head of cattle in the European Union in May/June 2002 (1). 
Vastavalt Eurostati korraldatud loendusele oli Euroopa Liidus 2002. aasta maisĐjuunis 81,1 miljonit veist.
France, with 20,5 million head, had more than a quarter of the European herd, followed by Germany and the United Kingdom with 14,0 and 10,4 million head respectively, i.e. 17,3 and 12,8 % of the European herd. 
(1) Enam kui veerand Euroopa veistest, 20,5 miljonit looma kuulub Prantsusmaa-le. Jrgnevad Saksamaa ja hendkuningriik vastavalt 14,0 ja 10,4 miljoni veisega, mis moodustavad vastavalt 17,3 ja 12,8 protsenti.
ItalyŐs herd, like that of Ireland, numbered more than 7,2 million head (8,9 %) and SpainŐs more than 6 million (see diagram 1). 
Itaalias ja Iirimaal on veiste arv le 7,2 miljoni (8,9 %) ning Hispaanias on veiseid le 6 miljoni (vt joonis 1).
Intra-Community movements are relatively extensive, whereas trade with third countries appears more limited. 
Loomade hendusesiseste liikumiste osa on kllaltki suur, samas kui kaubavahetus kolmandate riikidega on mnevrra piiratum.
In 2001 almost three million cattle were involved in intra-Community and extra-Community trade, which represents around 4 % of the European herd (see diagrams 2 and 3). 
2001. aastal oli hendusesiseste vi -vliste kaubanduste-hingutega seotud ligi 3 miljonit veist, see moodustab ligikaudu 4 % Euroopa veiste ldarvust (vt joonised 2 ja 3).
According to the information available, exits of cattle were very considerable in the case of France (1,4 million animals) and Germany (0,5 million animals). 
Olemasoleva teabe phjal on loomade pritoluriikide hulgas oluline osa Prantsusmaal (1,4 miljonit veist) ja Saksamaal (0,5 miljonit veist).
These two Member States account for more than 75 % of exits to other Community countries. 
Need kaks liikmesriiki on ligi 75 % teistesse henduse liikmesriikidesse vljaveetud loomade pritoluriigiks.
In contrast, exits of animals to other Member States involved fewer than 25 animals in the case of Finland, the United Kingdom, Portugal and Greece. 
Samas on liikmesriike, kust teistesse liikmesriikidesse vljaveetud veiste arv jb alla 25 looma, nagu Soome, hendkuningriik, Portugal ja Kreeka.
The same phenomenon was observed in the case of entries, where Italy (1,3 million animals), Spain (0,5 million), the Netherlands (0,4 million) and France (0,2 million) recorded 93 % of entries from other Member States. 
Samalaadne olukord on theldatav ka loomade sisseveol, kus Itaalia (1,3 miljonit veist), Hispaania (0,5 miljonit), Madalmaad (0,4 miljonit) ja Prantsusmaa (0,2 miljonit) on kokku registreerinud 93 % teistest liikmesriikidest sisseveetud veistest.
The 11 other Member States registered less than 7 % of intra-Community entries. 
Kik lejnud liikmesriigid on kokku registreerinud alla 7 % teistest liikmesriikidest prinevatest sisseveetud veistest.
The variations observed in respect of cattle flow are a reflection of the specific characteristics of the beef and veal sector in the different Member States. 
Loomade liikumiste selline theldatud eripra tuleneb veiseliha sektori eripradest erinevates liikmesriikides.
Italy, which has a deficit in beef, is a particular case in point. 
Sihtriigiks on eesktt Itaalia, kus veiselihaga varustatus ei ole piisav.
(1) Eurostat, Statistics in Focus, Agriculture and Fisheries, Theme 5 - 10/2001, bovine herd survey of November/December 2000. 
(1) Eurostat, lhistatistika, pllumajandus ja kalandus, teema 5Đ10/2001, 2000. aasta novembri/detsembri uurimus veisekasvatuse kohta.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/7 9. 
4.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 29/7 9.
Budgetary expenditure on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal, which is constantly increasing, came to 4 600 million euro, i.e. 11,5 % of total expenditure on agriculture, in 1999, and to 7 100 million euro, i.e. 16,4 % of agricultural expenditure, in 2002. 
Veiselihaturu hise korralduse eelarvelised kulutused tusid 1999. aastal 4,6 miljardi euroni, mis moodustab 11,5 % pllumajanduse kogukuludest ning 2002. aastal 7,1 miljardi euroni, mis vastab 16,4 % pllumajanduskulu-dest.
The budget provision for 2004 totalled 8 100 million euro, i.e. 17,2 % of total expenditure on agriculture (see table 1). 
2004. aastaks nhakse eelarves ette kogusumma 8,1 miljardi euro ulatuses, mis moodustab 17,2 % pllumajanduse kogukuludest (vt tabel 1).
This rapid growth in expenditure in recent years is the result of the increase in direct aid and the introduction of new forms of aid, such as the slaughter premium. 
Viimaste aastate kulude kiire kasv on seotud otsetoetuste suurenemisega ning uute toetuste vimaldamisega, nagu niteks loomade tapmise toetus.
10. lion euro in 1999 to 6 000 million euro in 2002, i.e. 80,7 % and 84,4 % respectively of total expenditure on beef and veal. 
10. Otsetoetustega seotud kulutused on tusnud 3,7 miljardilt eurolt 1999. aastal 6,0 miljardi euroni 2002. aastal, mis moodustab vastavalt 80,7 ja 84,4 protsenti veiselihasektori kogukuludest.
The budget for 2004 provides for a further increase in direct aid to 7 300 million euro, i.e. 90,2 % of total expenditure on beef and 
2004. aasta eelarves nhakse ette otsetoetuste tiendav tus kuni 7,3 miljardi euroni, mis moodustab 90,2% veiselihasektori kogukuludest.
Table 2 Direct aid paid in 2002 for bovine animals, by Member State % of total direct aid received by Germany, France, Italy and United Kingdom 58,9 % Table 3 Direct aid paid in 2002 in connection with BSE, by Member State % of total direct aid received by Germany, France, Italy and UK in connection with BSE 76,9 % 24,9 283,7 0,0 7,2 41,5 342,6 22,6 111,8 29,0 184,6 5,5 40,1 123,5 970,0 2,1% 16,2% 1 (million euro) 1 1 (million euro) 
Saksamaa, Prantsusmaa, Itaalia ja hendkuningriigi veiste spongioosse entsefalopaatia otsetoetuste osakaal 76,9 % Tabel 2 2002. aastal veiste osas makstud otsetoetused liikmesriikide kaupa maa ka paa-susmaa maa Itaalia nia Tabel 3 2002. aastal seoses BSE-ga makstud otsetoetused liikmesriikide kaupa Saksa-Kree- His-Prant- Iiri-Luk- Madal-Aust- Portu-burg 11,6 111,9 191,6 139,7 0,2% 1,9% 3,2% 2,3% 81,4 123,5 970,0 1,4% 2,1% 16,2% 0,3 0,0 7,2 36,6 41,5 342,6 17,7 22,6 111,8 17,7 29,0 184,6 1 1 riik (mln EUR) 1 (mln EUR)
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/9 Setting up the cattle identification and registration system Đ background and justification 11. 
4.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 29/9 Veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi kasutuselevtu taust ja phjendus 11.
Well before 1992, a number of Member States had set up cattle identification and registration systems on their own initiative. 
Veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemid veti mitmetes liikmesriikides nende endi algatusel kasutusele juba enne 1992. aastat.
These national systems did not guarantee that the identification numbers were unique, with the result that several animals in the same Member State could have the same identification number. 
Need siseriiklikud ssteemid ei taganud identifitseerimisnumbrite htset ssteemi, seega vis sama liikmesriigi mitmele loomale olla omistatud sama identifitseerimisnumber.
The reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP) in 1992 appreciably increased existing direct aid, such as premiums for male cattle and the suckler cow premiums, and introduced new ones such as the deseasonalisation premium (1) and the extensification premium (2). A new system for cattle identification and registration was introduced at that time to make more efficient control of budgetary expenditure possible and to avoid undue payment of premiums. 
1992. aasta htse pllumajanduspoliitika (PP) reformiga suurendati mrkimisvrselt olemasolevaid otsetoetusi, nagu isasloomatoetus ja piimalehmatoetus ning lisati uusi toetusi, nagu toetus veiste hooajavlisele tapmisele (1) ja tootmise ekstensiivis-tamistoetus. (2) Reformiga rakendati veiste uus identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteem, mis vimaldab eelarvekulutuste tpsemat kontrollimist ning vltida toetuste phjendamatut eraldamist.
The 1992 reform thus made provision for the simultaneous introduction of a compulsory cattle identification and registration system (3) and the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) and required cross-checks (4) between these databases with the aim of checking the direct payments made. 
1992. aasta reformiga nhti seega ette samaaegselt kohustusliku veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi (3) ning htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi (SIGC) rakendamine, kusjuures nutavaks muutus nende andmebaaside vaheline ristkontroll, (4) mille eesmrgiks on tegelike otseste vljamaksete tuvastamine.
The identification and registration system should have been operational on 1 October 1993 and the IACS databases on 1 January 1997. The majority of Member States complied with neither of these deadlines. 
Veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi rakendamise thtajaks oli 1. oktoober 1993 ning htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi andmebaaside rakendamise thtajaks oli 1. jaanuar 1997.
In 1997 the Council therefore decided to reinforce the legislation and to replace the Directive with a Regulation (5) setting out three main phases in order to achieve the (1) The aim of the deseasonalisation premium is to encourage slaughter of cattle outside the annual Ôoff-grassŐ period. 
Sellest tulenevalt otsustas komisjon muuta eeskirju rangemaks ning asendada kehtiv direktiiv mrusega, (5) milles nhakse pstitatud eesmrgi saavutamiseks ette kolm etappi.
(3) Council Directive 92/102/EEC of 27 November 1992 on the identification and registration of animals (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 
(3) Nukogu 27. novembri 1992. aasta direktiiv 92/102/EM loomade identifitseerimise ja registreerimise kohta (ET L 355, 5.12.1992, lk 32).
(4) Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 
(4) Nukogu mrus (EM) nr 3508/92 (ET L 355, 5.12.1992, lk 1).
(5) Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97. intended objective. 
(5) Nukogu mrus (E) nr 820/97.
As from 1 January 1998, all cattle born, imported or intended for intra-Community trade were to be given an identification number and registered. 
1998 oleks kik sndinud, imporditud vi hendusesiseseks kaubavahetuseks mratud veised pidanud olema identifitseeritavad ning registreeritud.
As from 31 December 1999 fully operational computerised databases were to make it possible to trace cattle from birth to slaughter or death, and on 1 January 2000 a compulsory labelling system was to be introduced for beef. 
Alates 31. detsembrist 1999 oleks tielikult rakendatud elektroonilised andmebaasid pidanud vimaldama veiste liikumise jlgimist alates nende snnihetkest kuni nende tapmise vi surmani ning alates 1. jaanuarist 2000 oleks tulnud rakendada veiseliha kohustuslikku mrgistamise ssteemi.
Due to the difficulties encountered by the Council and Parliament in defining labelling standards and the practical constraints pointed out by distributors, the deadline of 1 January 2000 for the implementation of a compulsory labelling system for beef was postponed until 1 January 2002 (6). 
Probleemide tttu, mis kerkisid komisjoni ja parlamendi ette mrgistamisega seotud standardite osas ning veiseliha jaotus-vrgus osalejate poolt tstatatud praktiliste takistuste tttu lkati veiseliha kohustusliku mrgistamise ssteemi rakendamise thtaeg edasi 1. jaanuarile 2002.
16. 
(6) 16.
The introduction of new premiums (slaughter premiums and additional payments (7)), in the context of the Agenda 2000 reform, made suckler cows eligible for one or more forms of direct aid. 
Uute toetuste kehtestamine (veiste tapatoetus ja tiendavad toetused) (7) Agenda 2000 raames muutis piimalehmad he vi mitme otsetoetuse jaoks abiklblikuks.
17. 
(8) 17.
In addition, cattle identification and registration, and the traceability which should be the result, are relevant to all expenditure for beef and veal (9), including expenditure on public storage and export refunds. 
Lisaks sellele on veiste identifitseerimine ja registreerimine ning sellest tulenev loomade liikumiste jlgitavus seotud kikide veiselihasektori kulutustega, (9) sealhulgas veiseliha riikliku ladustamisega seotud kulutustega ning ekspordihvitistega.
In fact, public storage and refunds can only be granted for beef and beef products which are labelled in such a way that a link can be established with the initial identification of the animal (10). 
Riiklik ladustamine ja ekspordihvitised on vimalikud vaid sellise veiseliha ja veiselihatoodete osas, mis on mrgistatud nii, et on vimalik mratleda seos vastava looma esialgse identifitseerimistunnusega.
What is the cattle identification and registration system? 
(10) Mis on veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteem?
(6) The 1997 Regulation was replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
(6) 1997. aasta mrus asendati mrusega (E) nr 1760/2000.
(7) This concerns additional payments paid from the Community budget, which the Member States may decide to grant beef producers and which are calculated per head and/or according to area subject to objective criteria, such as production conditions and structures. 
(7) Tegemist on henduse eelarvest makstavate lisatasudega, mida liikmesriigid vivad mrata veiseliha tootjatele ja mida arvestatakse he looma kohta ja/vi haritava pinna phjal lhtuvalt objektiivsetest kriteeriumidest nagu struktuurid ja tootmistingimused.
(8) Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21). 
(8) Nukogu 17. mai 1999. aasta mruse (E) nr 1254/1999 (veiseliha-ja vasikalihaturu hise korralduse kohta) artikkel 21 (ET L 160, 26.6.1999, lk 21).
(9) This system also affects the rural development sector expenditure based on per capita payments for cattle. 
(9) Ssteem hlmab ka maaelu arengu sektori kulusid, mida arvestatakse he veise kohta.
(10) Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
(10)Mruse (E) nr 1760/2000 artikli 13 lige 1.
C 29/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 19. 
C 29/10 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.2.2005 19.
All animals born on farms after 31 December 1997, or traded within the Community after this date, are identified by tags approved by the competent authority, attached to each ear. 
Kik majandites prast 31. detsembrit 1997 sndinud loomad peavad olema identifitseeritavad pdeva ametiasutuse poolt heakskiidetud mrkide abil, mis on kinnitatud looma mlemale krvale.
The two ear tags bear the same unique identification code, which makes it possible to identify each animal individually, together with the holding where it was born (see photograph 1). 
Mlemal krvamrgil on identne identifitsee-rimiskood, mis vimaldab identifitseerida konkreetse looma ning majandi, kus loom on sndinud (vt fotod 1).
Photograph 1: Ear tags, French (top left), British (top right) and German (bottom) 20. 
Fotod 1: Prantsuse krvamrgid (leval vasakul), briti krvamrgid (leval paremal) ja saksa krvamrgid (all) 20.
This core information (1) is included in the passports, in the registers and in the computerised databases. 
Phiandmed (1) on kantud loomapassidesse ning sisestatud registritesse ja elektroonilistesse andmebaasidesse.
As from 1 January 1998, for every animal that is to be identified the competent authority in the Member State issues a passport within 14 days of notification of the animalŐs birth or, in the case of animals imported from third countries, within (1) The identity code of the animal, its date of birth, gender, breed or information on the animalŐs coat. 
Alates 1. jaanuarist 1998 vljastab liikmesriigi pdev ametiasutus kahe ndala jooksul alates looma snnist teatamisest iga identifitseeritava looma kohta loomapassi, kolmandatest riikidest imporditud loomade puhul vljastatakse loomapass kahe ndala jooksul alates looma uuest identifitseerimisest.
When an animal is moved, its passport accompanies it. 
Kui loom liigub hest majandist teise, liigub loomapass koos loomaga.
In addition to the core data, the passport also provides additional information(2) (see photograph 2). 
Lisaks phiandmetele on loomapassi kantud ka teisi andmeid (2) (vt fotod 2).