natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court found that, in general, more advantageous prices are obtained in cases of direct purchase of products on the market, compared with using intervention stocks as a proxy for payment for the same products at the same time. 
MAJANDUSLIKULT ON SOODSAM OSTA TOOTEID TURULT KUI KASUTADA MAKSEVAHENDINA SEKKUMISVARUSID 65. Kontrollikoda leidis, et toodete ostmisel otse turult on hinnad tavaliselt soodsamad, võrreldes sellega, kui samal ajal kasutatakse sama liiki toodete eest tasumisel sekkumisvarusid.
For example, in 2007 in Poland, under the same tender procedure companies were invited to submit their bids for delivery of a product (a) in exchange for butter from intervention stocks and (b) via direct purchase. 
Näiteks 2007. aastal kutsuti Poolas samas pakkumismenetluses ettevõtteid esitama oma pakkumisi toote tarnimiseks a) vahetuskaubana sekkumisvarudest pärit või vastu ja b) otse turult ostmise teel.
The comparison of the results shows that the price for the direct purchase was lower by about 10 %33. 
Tulemuste võrdlemine näitab, et otse turult ostmisel oli hind ligikaudu 10 % madalam33.
31 OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114. 
31 ELT L 134, 30.4.2004, lk 114.
32 E.g. Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 of 28 July 1993 laying down the procedures and conditions for the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies (OJ L 191, 31.7.1993, p. 
32 Nt komisjoni 28. juuli 1993. aasta määruses (EMÜ) nr 2131/93 on sätestatud sekkumisametite valduses oleva teravilja müümise kord ja tingimused (ELT L 191, 31.7.1993, lk 76).
33 The ratio for exchange transactions reached 85 %, while the ratio for direct purchase is estimated at 94 %. 
33 Vahetustehingute suhtarv ulatus 85 %-ni, samas kui otse turult ostude puhul on see hinnanguliselt 94 %.
28 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
28 Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
The Commission has detailed information on the market price of products in the context of the intervention mechanism34. 
Komisjonil on üksikasjalik teave toodete turuhinna kohta sekkumismeh-hanismi kontekstis34.
However, in the context of the food programme for deprived persons the governing rules35 do not foresee that the competent services of the Commission are informed about the prices and conditions achieved by the tendering procedures taking place in the Member States. 
Seoses toiduprogrammiga puudustkannatavatele isikutele ei nähta aga eeskirjadega35 ette, et komisjoni pädevaid talitusi tuleks teavitada liikmesriikides toimuvate pakkumismenetlustega saadud hindadest ja tingimustest.
As a result the Commission has no assurance that the most advantageous terms have been obtained. 
Selle tulemusel puudub komisjonil kõige soodsamate tingimuste saavutamise kohta kinnitus.
TENDER PROCEDURES APPLIED BY THE MEMBER STATES DIFFER CONSIDERABLY 67. 
LIIKMESRIIKIDE PAKKUMISMENETLUSED ERINEVAD OLULISELT 67.
The Court found that national rather than EU tendering procedures are applied, with the result that they differ considerably between Member States and even within the same Member State, where more than one service is responsible for organising the tenders (Italy, France). 
Kontrollikoda leidis, et kohaldatakse pigem liikmesriigi kui ELi pakku-mismenetlusi, mille tulemuseks on nende oluline erinevus liikmesriikide vahel ja isegi ühe liikmesriigi piires, kus pakkumisi korraldab mitu asutust (Itaalia, Prantsusmaa).
In certain instances EU provisions are not respected. 
Teatud juhtudel ei peeta kinni ELi õigussätetest.
The differences concern important points of the tendering procedure such as the publicity given to the invitations to tender, the deadline for the submission of the offers, the guarantee lodged for the participation of the tenderers, the minimum number of participants and the evaluation methods and criteria used for awarding the contract (see Box 13). 
Erinevused on pakkumismenetluse olulistes punktides, nagu pakkumiskutsete avalikustamine, pakkumiste esitamise tähtaeg, pakkujate osalemiseks esitatud tagatis, osalejate miinimumarv ning hindamisel kasutatud meetodid ja kriteeriumid lepingu sõlmimisel (vt 13. selgitus).
34 The Commission follows and analyses market prices for a number of products in the context of adopting the invitation to tender procedures for the sale of agricultural products held by intervention agencies and the fixing of the minimum sale prices to be adopted by the corresponding management committee. 
34 Komisjon jälgib ja analüüsib rea toodete turuhindu seoses pakkumiskutsete heakskiitmisega sekkumisasutuste valduses olevate põllumajandustoodete müügiks ja vastava korralduskomitee poolt vastuvõetud madalamate müügihindade määramisega.
35 The obligation of the Member States to send the Commission the models of the invitations to tender (Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92) was abolished by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1127/2007 (OJ L 255, 29.9.2007, p. 18). 
35 Liikmesriikide kohustus saata komisjonile pakkumiskutsete näidised vastavalt määruse (EMÜ) nr 3149/92 artikli 4 lõikele 4 tühistati komisjoni määrusega (EÜ) nr 1127/2007 (ELT L 255, 29.9.2007, lk 18). 29 13.
29 BOX 13 Spain France36 Italy37 Poland Publication in OJ No Yes PA1: Yes PA2: No No Submission deadline (days) 15 PA1: 22 PA2: 45 PA1: 8–19 PA2: 10 20 Participation guarantee 2% PA1: 5 % PA2: 5 euro/tonne PA1: 10 % PA2: 15 euro/tonne 50 000 PLN (14 200 euro) Minimum number of participants No No Yes (2) No Number of tenderers 1–5 PA1: 6–7 PA2: 3–4 2–4 1–9 Evaluation of prices vs. market No PA1: No PA2: Yes Acceptable prices/ quantities are indicated in the invitation to tender No DIFFERENCES IN TENDER PROCEDURES AND CONDITIONS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES AUDITED 36 France: Paying Agency 1: ONIEP (Office National Interprofessionnel de l’Élevage et de ses Productions); Paying Agency 2: ONIGC (Office National Interprofessionnel des Grandes Cultures). 
SELGITUS Hispaania Prantsusmaa36 Itaalia37 Poola Avaldamine ELTs ei jah MA1: jah MA2: ei ei Esitamise tähtaeg (päevades) 15 MA1: 22 MA2: 45 MA1: 8–19 MA2: 10 20 Osaluse tagatis 2% MA1: 5 % MA2: 15 eurot tonni kohta MA1: 10 % MA2: 15 eurot tonni kohta 50 000 PLN (14 200 eurot) Osalejate miinimumarv ei ei jah (2) ei Pakkujate arv 1–5 MA1: 6–7 MA2: 3–4 2–4 1–9 Hindu võrreldakse turuhindadega ei MA1: ei MA2: jah Vastuvõetavad hinnad/kogused pakkumiskutses ei PAKKUMISMENETLUSTE JA TINGIMUSTE ERINEVUSED AUDITEERITUD LIIKMESRIIKIDE VAHEL 36 Prantsusmaa: makseasutus 1 ONIEP (Office National Interprofessionnel de l’Élevage et de ses Productions); makseasutus 2 ONIGC (Office National Interprofessionnel des Grandes Cultures).
37 Italy: Paying Agency 1: AGEA (Agencia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura); Paying Agency 2: Ente Nazionale Risi. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
37 Itaalia: makseasutus 1: AGEA (Agencia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura); makseasutus 2: Ente Nazionale Risi. Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
The auditors found weaknesses in the tender procedures examined, such as limited publicity of the tender invitations, low number of participants — which in some cases was just one — short time given between publication and the closing date for the submission of offer. 
Audiitorid leidsid kontrollitud pakkumismenetlustes puudusi, nagu pakkumiskutsete piiratud avaldamine, osalejate väike arv (paljudel juhtudel ainult üks osaleja), lühike ajavahemik pakkumiskutsete avaldamise ja pakkumise esitamise tähtaja vahel.
Additionally, the evaluation of the offers and the award of contracts are based principally on comparative data of the offers received, with no systematic comparison with other sources of information such as market prices. 
Lisaks põhineb pakkumiste hindamine ja lepingute sõlmimine peamiselt saadud pakkumiste võrdlusandmetel, ilma et neid võrreldaks süstemaatiliselt teiste teabeallikatega, nagu turuhinnad.
As such, the processes followed do not ensure the openness of the tenders, the broadest competition and that the best conditions and prices are obtained. 
Sellisel kujul ei taga järgitavad menetlused pakkumiste avatust, võimalikult laia konkurentsi ning parimaid hindu ja tingimusi.
An analysis of the tenders examined in certain Member States has shown that the contracts for several products were awarded to a limited number of companies over several years. 
Teatavates liikmesriikides kontrollitud pakkumiste analüüs on näidanud, et mitmete toodete lepingud sõlmiti mitme aasta jooksul ainult piiratud arvu ettevõtetega.
In such cases, two constraining factors apply: (a) the nature of the bartering arrangements limit the number of parties potentially interested in participating; and (b) the evaluation of the offers is difficult insofar as the paying agency cannot easily determine the expected yields which could be considered acceptable. 
Sellistel juhtudel on kaks piiravat tegurit: a) Kaubavahetuskorralduse olemus piirab osalemisest huvituvate osapoolte arvu; b) Pakkumisi on raske hinnata, kuna makseasutusel ei ole kerge määrata kindlaks eeldatavat tulemust, mida võiks lugeda vastuvõetavaks.
REFORM PROPOSAL: A RECENT COMMISSION INITIATIVE AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGRAMME 71. 
REFORMIETTEPANEK: HILJUTINE KOMISJONI ALGATUS JA PROGRAMMI MÕJU HINDAMINE 71.
A detailed analysis of the scheme was undertaken by the Commission starting in February 2008 for the preparation of a proposal for the reform of the programme. 
Alates veebruarist 2008 on komisjon teostanud skeemi üksikasjalikku analüüsi, et teha programmi reformiettepanek.
An inter-service steering group was set up, whereby 17 directorates-general were invited to participate, and a broad consultation with the Member States, the charitable organisations, academic experts in the field and a public online survey took place. 
Loodi talitustevaheline juhtgrupp, milles kutsuti osalema 17 peadirektoraati, ja reformiettepaneku üle konsulteeriti laialdaselt liikmesriikide, heategevusorga-nisatsioonide, valdkonna akadeemiliste ekspertidega, ning viidi läbi avalik Interneti-küsitlus.
30 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
30 Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
As a result the Commission adopted in September 2008 a proposal for the amendment of the Council Regulation38 and published an impact assessment report on the scheme. 
Selle tulemusel kiitis komisjon septembris 2008 heaks ettepaneku muuta nõukogu määrust38 ja avaldas skeemi mõju hindamise aruande.
This is expected to lead to a new legal framework for the 2010 programme. 
Selle eesmärk on kehtestada uus õiguslik raamistik 2010. aasta programmi jaoks.
The main elements of the Commission proposals are: (a) two sources of supply: intervention stocks or products directly purchased from the market, with priority given to the use of suitable intervention stocks; (b) wider variety of foods to be distributed: the products distributed would no longer be limited to those for which intervention applies; (c) long-term perspective: in order to enhance its efficiency, the Community food distribution plan would be established for a three year period; (d) clearer priorities: Member States would base their aid requests on national food distribution programmes, setting out their objectives and priorities; (e) co-financing: the introduction of co-financing would underpin the cohesion dimension of the scheme, ensure proper planning and reinforce synergies between the various actors; (f) reinforcing monitoring and reporting: reporting obligations at various levels would be increased. 
Komisjoni ettepanekute peamised elemendid on järgmised: a) kaks tarneallikat: sekkumisvarud või otse turult ostetud tooted, millest eelistatakse kasutada sobivaid sekkumisvarusid; b) jaotatavate toiduainete laiem valik: jaotatavad tooted ei piirdu enam üksnes sekkumisvarudest pärit toodetega; c) pikaajaline perspektiiv: tõhususe suurendamiseks kehtestatakse ühenduse kolmeaastane toidujaotusplaan; d) selgemad prioriteedid: liikmesriigid võtavad abitaotluste aluseks oma toidujaotusprogrammid, kus on määratletud nende eesmärgid ja prioriteedid; e) kaasfinantseerimine: kaasfinantseerimise kasutuselevõtmisega toetatakse skeemi ühtekuuluvuse mõõdet, tagatakse nõuetekohane planeerimine ja tugevdatakse erinevate osalejate vahelist koostoimet; f) järelevalve ja aruandluse tugevdamine: aruandluskohustust erinevatel tasanditel suurendatakse.
The Court recognises the benefit of these Commission proposals, some of which, if implemented, would help to remedy certain weaknesses identified by this audit such as the need for better targeting the EU aid, the inclusion of the programme in a broader social policy, the enlargement of the variety of products to be distributed and the need for improving management and administrative systems, especially tendering procedures. 
Kontrollikoda tunnustab komisjoni ettepanekutest saadavat kasu, kuna mõne ettepaneku rakendamine aitaks parandada käesoleva auditiga tuvastatud nõrku kohti, näiteks suunata ELi abi paremini, kaasata programm laiemasse sotsiaalpoliitikasse, laiendada jaotatavate toodete valikut ning parandada juhtimis-ja haldussüsteeme, eriti pakkumismenetlusi.
However, the Court emphasises that the reform of most of the markets under the CAP and the declining level of the intervention stocks in recent years imply that there is a need to reflect on the opportunity of continuing to finance this measure through CAP expenditure39. 
Kontrollikoda rõhutab siiski, et enamiku ÜPP turgude reform ning sekkumisvarude taseme langus viimastel aastatel tähendab, et on vaja kaalutleda, kas võimalus jätkata nimetatud meetme rahastamist ÜPP kulutustest39 on otstarbekas.
38 Proposal for a Council Regulation COM(2008) 563/3. 
38 Nõukogu määruse ettepanek KOM(2008) 563/3.
39 CAP rules and especially those for the market support measures imply certain difficulties already identified by the Commission like multiannual planning, which is hardly compatible with EAGF financing, and the impossibility of transferring non-used appropriations to the following years. 
39 ÜPP eeskirjad, eelkõige turutoetusmeetmeid käsitlevad eeskirjad, sisaldavad komisjoni poolt juba tuvastatud probleemi, nagu mitmeaastane planeerimine, mis ei ole kooskõlas Euroopa Põllumajanduse Tagatisfondi rahastamisega, ja asjaolu, et kasutamata assigneeringuid ei ole võimalik kanda üle järgmistele aastatele.
31 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
31 Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
75. 
32 75.
In this respect the Court also wishes to draw attention to the fact that the programme as implemented does not ‘give’ any right of the deprived persons to EU aid. 
Seoses sellega soovib kontrollikoda juhtida samuti tähelepanu asjaolule, et programmi rakendamisega ei anta puudustkannatavatele isikutele mingit õigust saada ELi abi.
This is not in line with the support provided traditionally by the CAP to the agricultural community. 
See ei ole kooskõlas toetusega, mida tavapäraselt antakse ÜPP raames põllumajandusega tegelevale rahvastikuosale.
Furthermore, the fact that market purchases would make no distinction between domestic and imported products further weakens the effect of the programme in terms of market intervention, as a measure directly supporting the purchase of imported products is not in line with the objectives of the CAP. 
Asjaolu, et turult ostetud toodete puhul ei tehta vahet kodumaiste ja importtoodete vahel, nõrgendab lisaks veelgi programmi mõjusust turusekkumise mõistes, kuna sellega toetatakse otseselt importtoodete ostmist, mis ei ole kooskõlas ÜPP eesmärkidega.
Source: Charitable Organisations. 32 Source: Charitable Organisations. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Allikas: Charitable Organisations. Allikas: Charitable Organisations. Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
33 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME REMAIN VALID AND IS THE APPROACH APPROPRIATE? 
33 JÄRELDUSED JA SOOVITUSED KAS PROGRAMMI EESMÄRGID ON ENDISELT KEHTIVAD JA LÄHENEMISVIIS ASJAKOHANE?
Food aid for deprived persons was first introduced in 1987 as a reaction to conditions faced by deprived persons during a particularly harsh winter. 
Esmakordselt hakati jaotama toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele 1987. aastal, kui reageeriti puudustkannatavate isikute eriti karmist talvest tingitud olukorrale.
Although it had the twin objectives of making a ‘significant’ contribution to the well-being of the most deprived citizens and the stabilisation of agricultural markets through the disposal of part of the substantial intervention stocks, its primary objective was considered to be a social measure. 
Kuigi toiduabi andmisel on kaks eesmärki: aidata oluliselt kaasa enim puudustkannatavate isikute heaolule ja stabiliseerida põllumajandusturge peamiste sekkumisvarude osalise müügi kaudu, loeti selle esmaseks eesmärgiks sotsiaalset mõõdet.
This was acknowledged in the evaluation of the measure published by the Commission in 1998. 
Seda tunnustati meetme hindamises, mille komisjon avaldas 1998. aastal.
The measure was considered appropriate for implementation ‘on a durable basis until the stocks have been run down to a normal level’. 
Meedet peeti asjakohaseks rakendada ka “edaspidi, kuni kõnealuseid varusid on vähendatud normaalkoguseni”.
The budgetary authorities consider that there is still a need for the aid as a social measure. 
Eelarvepädevad institutsioonid on seisukohal, et endiselt on vajadus abi kui sotsiaalse meetme järele.
In effect, it is estimated that some 16 % of the population of the Union accounting for some 80 million citizens fall into the definition of deprived persons used by the Commission. 
Hinnangu kohaselt on ligikaudu 16 % ühenduse elanikkonnast, s.o 80 miljonit kodanikku, komisjoni määratluse alusel puudustkannatavad isikud.
A European Parliament declaration in 2006 called for maintaining and increasing the aid as part of the efforts to reduce poverty. 
Euroopa Parlamendi 2006. aasta deklaratsioonis kutsuti üles säilitama ja suurendama toiduabi, mis täidab vaesuse vähendamise eesmärki.
The Commission’s reform proposal of September 2008 intends to improve the implementation and sound financial management of the programme and contains elements, which, if implemented, will remedy certain weaknesses identified by this report. 
Komisjoni 2008. aasta septembri reformiettepanekuga kavandatakse parandada programmi rakendamist ja usaldusväärset finantsjuhtimist ning see sisaldab elemente, mille rakendamise korral parandatakse teatavaid käesolevas aruandes tuvastatud puudusi.
However, the reform proposes to continue using agricultural funds for a measure, which is not targeted to farmers or to the farming community and with several characteristics such as multiannuality and the non-compulsory nature of support to deprived persons, which are not compatible with the CAP and especially EAGF financing. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Reformis tehakse siiski ettepanek jätkata põllumajanduse rahaliste vahendite kasutamist meetme puhul, mis ei ole suunatud põllumajandustootjatele või põllumajandusega tegelevale rahvastikuosale ning mida iseloomustab mitmeaastasus ja puudustkannatavatele isikutele antava toetuse mittekohustuslikkus, mis ei sobi kokku ÜPP ja eelkõige Euroopa Põllumajanduse Tagatisfondi rahastamisega. Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
In general the programme has operated with insufficient coordination and cooperation with other key actors for social actions in the Member States. 
Üldiselt on programmi rakendatud ilma piisava kooskõlastamise ja koos-tööta liikmesriikide teiste peamiste sotsiaalmeetmetega seotud osapooltega.
Such cooperation is necessary for better understanding and meeting the needs of the deprived persons and the charitable organisations implementing the programme. 
Selline koostöö on vajalik, et paremini mõista ja rahuldada puudustkannatavate isikute ja programmi rakendavate heategevusorganisatsioonide vajadusi.
34 RECOMMENDATION 1 The Commission should consider whether it is appropriate to continue financing such a measure from the Common Agricultural Policy. 
34 1. SOOVITUS Komisjon peaks kaaluma, kas on asjakohane jätkata sellise meetme rahastamist ÜPP raames 2.
RECOMMENDATION 2 The Commission should encourage Member States to take the necessary steps to embed the programme in the social policy framework and improve coordination and cooperation with other key actors for social actions in order to increase the synergy between bodies experienced in managing such programmes. 
SOOVITUS Komisjon peaks julgustama liikmesriike võtma vajalikke samme, et kaasata programm sotsiaalpoliitika raamistikku ning parandada kooskõlastamist ja koostööd teiste peamiste sotsiaalmeetmetega seotud osapooltega, et suurendada selliste programmide juhtimise kogemustega asutuste vahelist koostoimet.
PRIORITIES AND TARGETING OF THE RECIPIENTS WOULD INCREASE THE IMPACT OF THE PROGRAMME, ... 
PRIORITEETIDE SEADMINE JA ABI PAREM SUUNAMINE SUURENDAKS PROGRAMMI MÕJU,...
The measure was introduced primarily to alleviate the difficult situation of the most deprived persons, it was not designed to eliminate all food poverty. 
Meede võeti esmakordselt kasutusele, et leevendada enim puudustkannatavate isikute rasket olukorda, kuid sellega ei kavandatud kõrvaldada toidupuudusest tingitud vaesust.
The impact of the scheme is limited in global terms since it offers the equivalent of one meal per month to its beneficiaries. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Üldises mõttes on skeemi mõju piiratud, kuna selle abil pakutakse abisaajatele abi keskmiselt ühe toidukorra väärtuses kuus. Eriaruanne nr 6/2009 – Euroopa Liidu toiduabi puudustkannatavatele isikutele: eesmärkide, vahendite ja meetodite hindamine
There are no priorities established within the category of deprived persons to specifically target the aid. 
Puudustkannatavate isikute kategooria siseselt ei ole kehtestatud abi täpsema suunamise prioriteete.
Moreover, the charitable organisations that manage the programme at operational level, mostly staffed by volunteers, address a target group which is not sufficiently stable to facilitate full accountability for the aid received. 
Pealegi tegelevad tegevustasandil programmi haldavad ja peamiselt vabatahtlikke töötajaid koondavad heategevusorganisatsioonid sihtrühmaga, mis ei ole piisavalt stabiilne, soodustamaks aruandekohustuse täiel määral täitmist.