natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Afairlycomprehensivemonitoringandcontrolsystem...................... 
Teaveprojektiderakendamisethususekohta .............................
I-IX 1-7 1-3 4-5 6-7 8-11 8 9-10 11 12-44 12-21 12-15 16-17 18 19-21 22-26 22-23 24-26 27-39 27-33 34 35 36-39 Paragraphs Page 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 13 13 
IĐIX 1Đ7 1Đ3 4Đ5 6Đ7 8Đ11 8 9Đ10 11 12Đ44 12Đ21 12Đ15 16Đ17 18 19Đ21 22Đ26 22Đ23 24Đ26 27Đ39 27Đ33 34 35 36Đ39 Punktid Lk 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 13 13 C 170/2 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21.7.2006 Punktid Lk Tulemustesaavutaminejapiisavjtkusuutlikkus ...............................
CONCLUSIONS ............................................................ RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 
44 15 JRELDUSED .............................................................. 45Đ49 16 SOOVITUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50Đ54 17 LISA: Tsunami tagajrjed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........
40-43 14 44 15 45-49 16 50-54 17 ANNEX:Mapofimpactoftsunami ........................................................ 
18 Komisjoni vastused . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........
19 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BRR Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Office DG ECHO Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid DIPECHO Disaster preparedness in DG ECHO ECHO European Community Humanitarian Aid Office EU European Union (EU) FAFA Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement FPA Framework Partnership Agreement GAM Free Aceh Movement HIC Humanitarian Information Centre IDP Internally displaced person LRRD Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development LTTE Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam MIC Monitoring and Information Centre NGOs Non-governmental organisations TEC Tsunami Evaluation Coalition UN United Nations UNDAC United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 
19 LHENDID BRR Taastus-ja lesehitusamet (Badan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi) ECHO Humanitaarabi peadirektoraat (DG ECHO) DIPECHO Disaster preparedness in ECHO ECHO European Community Humanitarian Office GAM Vaba Acehi Liikumine (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka) LTTE Tamil Eelami Vabastustiigrid (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) VVO Valitsusvline organisatsioon TEC Tsunami mju hindamisrhm (Tsunami Evaluation Coalition) ROHKT RO Humanitaarksimuste Koordineerimise Talitus (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs)
21.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. On 26 December 2004, an earthquake off the west coast of Northern Sumatra triggered a massive tsunami causing widespread destruction in many countries of the Indian Ocean, killing over 200 000 people. 
21.7.2006 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja KOMMENTEERITUD KOKKUVÍTE I. 26. detsembril 2004. aastal phjustas Phja-Sumatra lneranniku lhedal toimunud maavrin vimsa tsunami, mis tekitas laiaulatuslikku hvingut paljudes India ookeani riikides ja mille tttu hukkus le 200000 inimese.
The international community responded generously with over 5 billion euro of humanitarian aid (see paragraphs 1 to 3). 
Rahvusvaheline ldsus andis ulatuslikku humanitaarabi Ń le 5 miljardi euro (vt punktid 1Đ3).
The European Commission has a specific Directorate-General, Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO), to respond to humanitarian crises. 
Euroopa Komisjonil on humanitaarkriisidele reageerimiseks spetsiaalne peadirektoraat Ń humanitaarabi peadirektoraat (ECHO).
DG ECHO does not implement relief activities directly, but through partners which consist of NGOs and international organisations, including the United Nations and Red Cross. 
ECHO ei vii hdaabimeetmeid ellu otse, vaid partnerite kaudu, kelleks on valitsusvlised organisatsioonid ja rahvusvahelised organisatsioonid, sealhulgas RO ja Punase Risti organisatsioonid.
Following the tsunami, DG ECHO granted funding of 123 million euro of humanitarian aid (see paragraphs 4 to 6). 
Tsunamijrgselt andis ECHO 123 miljoni euro vrtuses humanitaarabi (vt punktid 4Đ6).
On the basis of an examination of documentation, interviews, on-the-spot visits and a review of other audits and evaluations, the CourtŐs audit examined the CommissionŐs humanitarian aid response to the tsunami. 
Kontrollikoja auditis analsiti dokumentide, intervjuude, kohapealsete klastuste ning teiste auditite ja hindamiste phjal komisjoni humanitaarabi tsunami ohvritele.
IV. Commission procedures enabled a rapid response to the tsunami, granting 3 million euro the same day as the disaster, followed by a further 20 million euro within five days. 
Kesolevas aruandes esitatakse jrgmised phiksimused (vt punktid 8Đ11): C 170/3 a) b) c) d) IV. dati 3 miljonit eurot; jrgmise viie peva jooksul eraldati veel 20 miljonit eurot.
An additional 80 million euro was granted in February 2005, followed by 20 million euro in December 2005, making a total of 123 million euro. 
2005. aasta veebruaris eraldati ligikaudu 80 miljonit eurot; sama aasta detsembris eraldati veel 20 miljonit eurot, mis teeb kokku 123 miljonit eurot.
The high level of funding proved appropriate particularly due to the longer than expected transition from the relief phase to the reconstruction phase (see paragraphs 12 to 15). 
Suurt toetussummat igustab eriti asjaolu, et leminek hdaabietapist lesehitusetappi vttis kavandatust rohkem aega (vt punktid 12Đ15).
V. DG ECHO had been working in Sri Lanka prior to the tsunami on projects with the conflict affected population. 
V. ECHO oli enne tsunamit Sri Lankal ttanud projektidega, mis keskendusid sjalistes konfliktides kannatanud elanikkonna abistamiseks.
Following the tsunami, DG ECHO chose to work with existing partners in Sri Lanka who knew the situation well, enabling it to fund relevant projects in spite of the situation of over-funding and overcrowding caused by the large number of newly arrived NGOs. 
Tsunamijrgselt otsustas ECHO jtkata koostd olemasolevate Sri Lanka partneritega, kes tundsid hsti kohalikku olukorda, mis vimaldas ECHO-l rahastada olulisi projekte, hoolimata suure hulga hiljuti saabunud valitsusvliste organisatsioonide phjustatud lerahastamisest ja lerahvas-tatusest.
In Aceh DG ECHO did not have a presence in the field before the tsunami. 
Acehis ei olnud ECHO-l enne tsunamit kohapealset esindust.
Due to difficult access and lack of reliable information some early project proposals were a standard response to an emergency situation. 
Raske ligipsetavuse ja usaldusvrse teabe puudumise tttu kujutasid mningad varased projektiettepanekud endast pelgalt eriolukorras esitatavat standardvastust.
Later project proposals from February 2005 onwards were based on more reliable needs assessments (see paragraphs 16 to 21). 
Hilisemad, alates 2005. aasta veebruarist esitatud projektiettepanekud phinesid usaldusvr-semal vajaduste analsil (vt punktid 16Đ21).
Regarding coordination with other Commission services, there has been good coordination to ensure a smooth link between short-term relief efforts and longer term reconstruction. 
Koosklastus teiste komisjoni talitustega on olnud thus, tagamaks sujuvat leminekut lhiajalistelt hdaabitdelt pikaajalisele lesehitusele.
C 170/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.7.2006 VII. 
C 170/4 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21.7.2006 VII.
DG ECHOŐs system for monitoring and controlling projects consists of monitoring visits of field experts and desk officers, reports of partners, on-the-spot visits of the DG ECHO Finances and Audit Unit, checks prior to final payment and later external audits. Procedures generally enabled projects to be modified to meet evolving needs. 
ECHO projektide seire-ja kontrollissteem koosneb kohapealsete ekspertide ja projektiametnike kont-rollkikudest, partnerite aruannetest, ECHO finants-ja auditiksuse kohapealsetest klastustest, kontrollidest enne lppmakse sooritamist, ja hilisematest vlisaudititest. ldjuhul vimaldasid menetlused projekte muuta vastavalt esilekerkinud vajadustele.
However, there is scope to develop comparative cost information, to provide more details on organisational arrangements and to quantify the achievement of project outputs (see paragraphs 27 to 39). 
Siiski tuleks veel tiustada vrdlevat kuluteavet, esitada ksikasjalikumat teavet organisatoorse korralduse kohta ning projekti vljundite saavutamist kvantitatiivselt vljendada (vt punktid 27Đ39).
Projects funded by the Commission have been implemented, though in some cases project outputs have been less than planned due to inflation and difficulties in obtaining goods and recruiting qualified staff. 
Komisjoni rahastatud projektid viidi ellu, kuigi mnel juhul osutusid projekti tulemused oodatust nrgemaks inflatsiooni, samuti kaupade hankimisel ja kvalifitseeritud personali vrbamisel esinenud raskuste tttu.
Projects managed by DG ECHO partners contributed to covering the basic needs of the population in terms of shelter, food, water and sanitation, health, psychosocial support, child and family care and telecommunications. 
ECHO koostpartnerite juhitud projektid aitasid katta elanikkonna phivajadusi peavarju, toidu, vee-ja sanitaarssteemide, tervishoiu, pshhosotsiaalse toetuse, laste-ja perehoolduse ning sidevahendite osas.
The Commission is also financing projects to support disaster preparedness. 
Komisjon rahastab ka katastroofiks valmisolekut toetavaid projekte.
The audit work confirmed the findings of other evaluations that the relief effort was effective, though poorly coordinated. 
Audit kinnitab teiste hindamiste leide, mille kohaselt olid hdaabitd thusad, kuigi ebapiisavalt koordineeritud.
In particular, the water and sanitation component of a UN agency project in Aceh reached 100 000 people, representing only 5 % of the originally planned 2 million beneficiaries (see paragraphs 40 to 44). 
Niteks he RO agentuuri projekti puhul Acehis judis vee ja sanitaarssteemide projektiosa 100 000 inimeseni, mis on ainult 5 % algselt planeeritud 2 miljonist abisaajast (vt punktid 40Đ44).
The recommendations made on the basis of the CourtŐs observations and conclusions are the following: (a) the Commission should consider the role it could play in helping affected governments to manage donor coordination more effectively; (b) the roles of DG ECHO and DG Environment (Civil Protection Mechanism) should be clarified to ensure a coherent approach; (c) a longer timeframe for emergency operations should be considered in order to provide sufficient time for implementation; (d) DG ECHO should strengthen its monitoring system in order to include written feedback to partners following monitoring visits, the development of comparative cost information, an explanation of the implementing arrangements and information on what has been done where; (e) the difficulties of access to documentation of projects implemented by UN agencies should be taken into account in the context of the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA). 
Kontrollikoda esitab oma thelepanekute ja jrelduste phjal jrgmised soovitused: a) komisjon peaks kaaluma vimalusi katastroofis kannatanud riikide valitsuste aitamiseks, et rahastamise koordineerimist thustada; b) ECHO ja keskkonna peadirektoraadi (kodanikukaitse mehhanism) rollid tuleks muuta selgemaks, et tagada htne lhenemisviis; c) hdaabioperatsioonidele tuleks ette nha pikem ajakava, et vimaldada nende elluviimiseks piisav aeg; d) ECHO peaks tugevdama oma seiressteemi ja lisama sellesse kirjaliku tagasiside partneritele prast kont-rollklastusi, vrdleva kuluteabe tiustamise, selgituse rakenduskorra kohta, samuti teabe selle kohta, kus milliseid tegevusi on ellu viidud; e) finants-ja haldusraamistiku lepingu raames tuleks arvesse vtta raskusi RO agentuuride poolt elluviidud projektide dokumentidele juurdepsul.
21.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 170/5 INTRODUCTION The tsunami of 26 December 2004 1. 
21.7.2006 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 170/5 SISSEJUHATUS 26. detsembri 2004. aasta tsunami 1.
On 26 December 2004, an earthquake off the west coast of Northern Sumatra triggered a massive tsunami causing widespread destruction in many countries of the Indian Ocean, killing over 200 000 people. 
26. detsembril 2004. aastal phjustas Phja-Sumatra lneranniku lhedal toimunud maavrin vimsa tsunami, mis tekitas laiaulatuslikku hvingut paljudes India ookeani riikides ja mille tttu hukkus le 200000 inimese.
The Indonesian province of Aceh suffered the worst of the devastation where over 160 000 people were dead or missing and over half a million were displaced. 
Suurimat hvingut phjustas hiidlaine Indoneesias Acehi provintsis, kus hukkus vi ji kadunuks le 160 000 inimese ning le poole miljoni elaniku asustati mber.
In Sri Lanka, the second worst affected country, some 35 000 people were dead or missing and half a million were displaced. The map in the Annex summarises the impact of the tsunami. 
Teiseks kige enam sai kannatada Sri Lanka, kus hukkus vi ji kadunuks le 35 000 inimese ning pool miljonit elanikku asustati mber. Lisas toodud kaardil vetakse kokku tsunami tagajrjed.
By January 2006, the global level of humanitarian assistance in response to the tsunami had reached some 5,1 billion euro, of which 3,4 billion euro (67 %) came from private donors (1). 
2006. aasta jaanuariks oli tsunami ohvritele antud humanitaarabi kokku ligikaudu 5,1 miljardit eurot, millest 3,4 miljardit eurot (67 %) prines eraannetajatelt.
In Aceh a 30-year conflict between the Government of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) had claimed 15 000 lives. 
Acehis on 30 aastat kestnud konflikt Indoneesia valitsuse ja Vaba Acehi Liikumise (GAM) vahel nudnud 15 000 inimelu.
In Sri Lanka there has been on-and-off civil war between the Government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) since 1983 leaving 60 000 people dead. 
Sri Lankal on alates 1983. aastast va-heaegadega kestnud kodusjas valitsusvgede ja Tamil Eelami Va-bastustiigrite (LTTE) vahel surma saanud 60 000 inimest.
After three years of ceasefire and the return of 400 000 people to their places of origin, there are still an estimated 400 000 cases of displacement. 
Prast seda, kui relvarahu on kestnud kolm aastat ja 400 000 inimest on naasnud oma kodudesse, on mberasustatuid ikka veel hinnanguliselt 400 000.
Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO) 4. 
Humanitaarabi peadirektoraat (ECHO) 4.
The European Commission has a specific Directorate-General, DG ECHO, to respond to humanitarian crises. 
Euroopa Komisjonil on humanitaarkriisidele reageerimiseks spetsiaalne peadirektoraat, ECHO.
DG ECHOŐs mandate is described in Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid (3) and includes saving and preserving life during emergencies, carrying out short-term rehabilitation work, helping those affected gain a level of self-sufficiency, taking long-term development objectives into account where possible and ensuring preparedness for risks of natural disasters. 
Selle mandaati on kirjeldatud nukogu 20. juuni 1996. aasta mruses (E) nr 1257/96 humanitaarabi kohta (3) ja see hlmab inimelude pstmist ja hoidmist hdaolukorras, lhiajaliste taastamis-ja lesehitustde lbiviimist, kannatanute abistamist piisava toimetuleku taseme saavutamisel, vttes vimalusel arvesse pikaajalisi arengueesmr-ke, ning valmisoleku tagamist loodusnnetustega seotud ohtudeks.
Average annual EU humanitarian aid funding is in the order of 600 million euro. 
ELi antava humanitaarabi keskmine aastaeelarve on suurusjrgus 600 miljonit eurot.
Although Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 allows for the direct implementation of relief activities by the Commission, in practice DG ECHO entrusts the implementation (1) Source: UN Financial Tracking Service. 
Ehkki mrus (E) nr 1257/96 humanitaarabi kohta vimaldab komisjonil hdaabitid otse ellu (1) Allikas: RO finantsjrelevalvetalitus.
(2) Source: UN Office of the Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery. 
(2) Allikas: tsunamijrgset lesehitust kontrolliva RO erisaadiku broo.
(3) OJ L 163, 2.7.1996, p. 1. of aid to its partners which consist of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and international organisations (e.g. International Committee of the Red Cross, International Organisation for Migration and United Nations (UN) organisations). 
(3) ET L 163, 2.7.1996, lk 1. viia, usaldab ECHO tegelikkuses abimeetmete elluviimise oma partneritele, kelleks on valitsusvlised organisatsioonid (VVOd) ja rahvusvahelised organisatsioonid (nt Rahvusvaheline Punase Risti Komitee, Rahvusvaheline Migratsiooniorganisatsioon ning RO organisatsioonid).
The roles and responsibilities of NGOs and international organisations (other than UN) which have been assessed as suitable partners are defined in Framework Partnership Agreements (FPAs). 
Sobivateks koostpartneriteks loetava-te valitsusvliste ja rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonide (muud kui RO organisatsioonid) rollid ja lesanded on mratletud partnerluse raamlepingutes.
Other Commission instruments involved in the response to the tsunami 6. 
Muud tsunamijrgsesse tegevusse kaasatud komisjoni vahendid 6.
Complementing DG ECHO interventions, other Commission instruments were involved in the response to the tsunami, including, at the initial stage, the Civil Protection Mechanism, set up by Council Decision 2001/792/EC of 23 October 2001 (4) and based in DG Environment. 
Lisaks ECHO sekkumistele kaasati tsunami ohvrite abistamiseks teisi komisjoni vahendeid. Abi andmise algfaasis osales niteks nukogu 23. oktoobri 2001. aasta otsusega 2001/792/E (4) loodud ja keskkonna peadirektoraadis baseeruv kodanikukaitse mehhanism.
Through its Monitoring and Information Centre (MIC) the Civil Protection Mechanism appointed teams of experts and sent them to the tsunami affected region to help assess the situation and coordinate the arrival and distribution of civil protection assistance offered by Member States. 
Oma seire-ja teabekeskuse kaudu mras kodanikukaitse mehhanism ekspertide rhmad, kes saadeti tsunamist kannatada saanud piirkonda, et aidata olukorda hinnata ning koordineerida liikmesriikide poolt saadetava kodanikukaitse alase abi kohalejudmist ja jagamist.
Longer term rehabilitation, reconstruction and recovery are under the responsibility of the Directorates-General for External Relations (RELEX) and European Aid (AIDCO), whilst DG ECHO is responsible for the humanitarian response consisting of emergency relief and short-term rehabilitation. The grey area between short-term relief and longer term development is addressed by the process of linking relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD) (5). 
Pikaajaline taastamis-ja lesehitustegevus kuulub vlissuhete peadirektoraadi ning koosttalituse EuropeAid vastutusalasse. ECHO vastutab humanitaarabi eest, mille alla kuulub hdaabi ja lhiajaline taastamistegevus. leminekuks lhiajaliselt hdaabilt pikaajalisemale arendustle on loodud hdaabi, taastamis-ja arendustegevuse hendamise protsess (5).
The Rapid Reaction Mechanism, set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 381/2001 of 26 February 2001 (6) and based in DG RELEX, is designed to assist in this process by allowing the Commission to respond, in a rapid and flexible manner to crises, by helping to create the conditions under which longer term development can be pursued. 
Nukogu 26. veebruari 2001. aasta mrusega (E) nr 381/2001 (6) loodud ja vlissuhete peadirektoraadi vastutusalasse kuuluva kiirreageerimise korra lesandeks on sellele protsessile kaasa aidata, et vimaldada komisjonil kriisidele kiiresti ja paindlikult reageerida, aidates luua tingimused pikaajaliseks arendustegevuseks.
THE COURTŐS AUDIT Reasons to carry out the audit 8. 
KONTROLLIKOJA AUDIT Auditi lbiviimise phjused 8.
In view of the high level of funding by institutions and individuals in the response to the tsunami, and given the interest shown by the European Parliament and the Council, the Court decided to audit the EU humanitarian response. 
Kontrollikoda otsustas auditeerida ELi poolt tsunami ohvritele antud humanitaarabi, vttes arvesse nii asutuste kui ksikisikute poolt antud abi ulatuslikkust, samuti Euroopa Parlamendi ja nukogu poolt lesnidatud huvi.
(4) OJ L 297, 15.11.2001, p. 
(4) ET L 297, 15.11.2001, lk 7.
(5) Commission Communication COM(96) 153 on Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) and COM(2001) 153 on Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Ń An assessment. 
(5) Komisjoni teatis KOM(96) 153 hdaabi, taastus-ja arendustegevuse hendamise kohta ja KOM(2001) 153 hdaabi, taastus-ja arendustegevuse hendamise kohta Ń hinnang.
(6) OJ L 57, 27.2.2001, p. 5. 
(6) ET L 57, 27.2.2001, lk 5.
C 170/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.7.2006 Scope and objectives of the audit 9. 
C 170/6 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21.7.2006 Auditi ulatus ja eesmrk 9.
The scope of this audit is limited to the CommissionŐs humanitarian aid response. 
Auditi ulatus on piiratud komisjoni antud humanitaarabiga.
The financial decisions corresponding to the audit scope are shown in table 1. 
Auditi ulatusse kuuluvad rahastamisotsused on toodud 1. tabelis.
The audit has also examined entities on the periphery of DG ECHO, such as the Civil Protection Mechanism, when they impact on DG ECHOŐs humanitarian response. 
Samuti vaadeldi auditis ECHO keskmest vlja jvaid ksusi, nagu kodanikukaitse mehhanism, kui nad avaldasid mju ECHO antavale humanitaarabile.
Date 26 December 2004 30 December 2004 31 December 2004 9 February 2005 15 December 2005 Decision Duration Amount Regional Indonesia 3 months 3,0 3,0 6 months 10,0 6 months 10,0 10,0 18 months 80,0 13,7 30,5 18 months 20,0 10,0 Allocation of funding Sri Lanka India (million euro) Maldives Thailand Table 1 Humanitarian aid granted by Commission Total decisions 123,0 16,7 50,5 24,3 10,0 8,0 2,0 40,6 12,0 32,5 10,0 24,8 6,5 1,0 0,5 2,7 0,5 2,7 0,5 2,2 0,4 8,3 1,7 Total contracted by December 2005 Total disbursed by December 2005 Source: DG ECHO. 10. 
1. tabel Komisjoni antud humanitaarabi Kuupev 26.12 2004 30.12 2004 31.12 2004 9.2.2005 15.12.2005 Otsus Kestus Summa Kohalik 3 kuud 3,0 3,0 6 kuud 10,0 6 kuud 10,0 18 kuud 80,0 13,7 18 kuud 20,0 Otsused kokku 123,0 16,7 (miljonit eurot) Eraldatud abi Indoneesia Sri Lanka India Maldiivid Tai 8,3 1,7 10,0 30,5 24,3 10,0 1,0 0,5 10,0 8,0 2,0 50,5 40,6 12,0 2,7 0,5 40,2 32,5 10,0 2,7 0,5 31,3 24,8 6,5 2,2 0,4 d) kas ECHO partnerite poolt elluviidud projektid titsid kavandatud eesmrgid ja kas lhiajalised taastamistd olid piisavalt jtkusuutlikud?
Audit approach 11. 
Auditi lhenemisviis 11.
DG ECHOŐs management, monitoring of other Commission services, international organisations and control systems were assessed at HQ level and corroborated and other countries? by visits to DG ECHOŐs field offices, partners and projects in Sri Lanka and Indonesia. 
ECHO juhtimis-, seire-ja kontrollissteeme hinnati peakontori tasandil ning saadud andmete tesust kontrolliti, klastades ECHO kohalikke esindusi, partnereid ja projekte Sri Lankal ja Indoneesias.
Table 2 shows projects and partners visited on the spot. 
2. tabelis on ra toodud kohapeal klastatud projektid ja partnerid.
Projects for on-the-spot visits were selected according to criteria of sector, location, amount, stage of implementation and type of partner in order to obtain a reasonable overall (c) Were DG ECHOŐs monitoring and control procedures picture. 
Projektid valiti kohapealseks klastuseks valdkonna, asukoha, abisumma, rakendusetapi ja partneri liigi phjal, et saada usaldusvrne levaade.