natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The on-the-spot checks carried out by the Member States (see table 6) were evaluated as follows. 
Liikmesriikide poolt teostatud kohapealsed kontrollid (vt tabel 6) toimusid alljrgnevalt.
In Germany, the on-the-spot checks were organised at Lnder level. 
Saksamaal toimusid kohapealsed kontrollid liidumaade tasandil.
In Bavaria, the minimum checking rate of 10 % was not respected, the method of selecting the beneficiaries to be audited was not based on an annual risk analysis, the legal penalties were not applied and the results of on-the-spot checks were not systematically forwarded to the premium administrators. 
Baieris ei peetud kinni kontrolli nutavast 10 % tasemest, kontrollitavate majandite valik ei toimunud riskianalsi alusel, igusaktidega ette nhtud karistusi ei rakendatud ning kohapealsete kontrollide tulemusi ei edastatud sstemaatiliselt lisatasude haldajatele.
France and Great Britain did not comply with the minimum rate of 10 % for on-the-spot checks. 
Prantsusmaal ja Suurbritannias ei jrgitud kontrollile kehtestatud 10 % miinimumnuet.
In Italy, the quality of the checks, the recording of the results of those checks, the application of penalties and the forwarding of the results to the premium managers all raised doubts about the reliability of the on-the-spot checks. 
Itaalias panid kontrollide kvaliteet, kontrollitulemuste vormista-mine, karistuste rakendamine ja tulemuste edastamine lisatasude haldajatele kahtluse alla kohapealsete kontrollide usaldusvrsuse.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 92. 
JRELDUSED JA SOOVITUSED 92.
Considering that the objective of the legislation on cattle identification and registration is to ensure the traceability of all cattle movements on the territory of the European Union, the regulatory framework put in place has some conceptual shortcomings (paragraphs 33 to 46). 
Silmas pidades asjaolu, et veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise alaste igusaktide eesmrgiks on tagada kikide Euroopa Liidu territooriumil toimuvate veiste liikumiste jlgita-vus, tuleb mrkida, et rakendatud iguslik raamistik sisaldab mitmeid phimttelisi lnki (punktid 33Đ46).
For example, Community legislation makes no provision for procedures to monitor movements of cattle between Member States, although between 3 and 4 % of cattle change Member State every year. 
Niteks ei nhta henduse igusaktides ette veiste liikmesriikidevahelise liikumise alast jrelevalvet, kuigi igal aastal liigub hest liikmesriigist teise 3Đ4 % veistest.
The databases developed in the Member States are very heterogeneous, which is a barrier to interconnection of the databases (paragraphs 40 and 41). 
Liikmesriikides vljattatud andmebaaside osas on theldatav suur ebahtlus, mis takistab teabevahetust nende andmebaaside vahel (punktid 40Đ41).
Ń The Commission should be empowered to draw up, within the framework of existing or amended procedures, precise criteria for operation of the national databases (common administrative rules, quality indicators, definition of a format for the exchange of data between national databases, etc.) (paragraphs 86 to 90). 
Ń Komisjon peaks mratlema olemasolevate vi muudetavate menetluste raames riiklike andmebaaside kasutuselevtu konkreetsed tingimused (htse halduse eeskirjad, kvaliteedinitajad, formaat teabe vahetamiseks siseriiklike andmebaaside vahel jne) (punktid 86Đ90).
The legislation stipulates, without laying down rules on the procedures, that the Commission is to assess whether the databases are fully operational. 
Íigusaktides on meetodeid mratlemata ette nhtud, et komisjon otsustab, kas andmebaasid on tielikult tle rakendatud.
This justification reduces the impact of recognition that databases are operational (paragraphs 55 to 64). 
See phjendus vhendab andmebaaside tieliku kasutuselevtu tunnustamise mju (punktid 55Đ64).
Ń If the aim is to have databases which are operational, the procedure for recognising databases should be strengthened by redefining the objective and detailing the criteria that must be met, in respect of both design and operation, in order for the Commission to award recognition and renew it periodically (paragraphs 55 to 65). 
Ń Kui eesmrgiks on seatud andmebaaside korrakohane tle-rakendamine, tuleks andmebaaside tunnustamise menetlust thustada, muutes eesmrgi pstitust ning tpsustades andmebaaside tunnustamisel jrgitavaid komisjoni kriteeriume nii ldphimtte kui toimimise osas, htlasi muutes nimetatud tunnustuse perioodiliselt uuendatavaks (punktid 55Đ65).
The Commission should therefore take on a guiding role in the system of cattle identification and registration (paragraphs 38 to 40 and 47) and carry out regular checks to ensure that the databases are fully operational (paragraphs 55 to 59, 65 to 69 and paragraph 71) by setting up a coherent procedure for verifying the operation of the system in the Member States, including annual certification of the quality of information in the national databases (paragraphs 37 and 69). 
Sealjuures peaks komisjon tagama veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi keskse rolli (punktid 38Đ40, 47) ning kontrollima perioodiliselt andmebaaside tielikku kasutuselevttu (punktid 55Đ59, 65Đ69 ja punkt 71), rakendades veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi sidusat toimimiskontrolli liikmesriikides, mis hlmab riiklikes andmebaasides sisalduvate andmete kvaliteedi iga-aastast sertifitseerimist (punktid 37, 69).
The current legislation has inconsistencies and impreci-93. sions, which give rise to differences in treatment among Member States (paragraph 38). 
93. sidususe puudumist, mis on tingitud liikmesriikide rakendatavate ksitluste erinevustest (punkt 38).
In addition, the existence of options in the application of the legislation complicates the system (paragraph 39). 
Lisaks sellele muudavad igusaktide rakendamisel pakutavad valikuvimalused ssteemi keerulisemaks (punkt 39).
Ń All keepers of cattle should be included in the identification and registration system (see paragraph 32). 
Ń Veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteem peaks hlmama kiki loomapidajaid (vt punkt 32).
The reports should be subject to precise rules which are identical in all Member States. 
Edastatavate teadete suhtes peaksid kehtima ksikasjalikud eeskirjad, mis oleksid olema kikides liikmesriikides hesugused.
The keeping of registers should be adapted to the activities of the various keepers and take into account technological developments (machine-readable bar codes, Internet, etc.). 
Registri pidamine peaks olema kohandatud erinevate loomapidajate tegevusele ning vtma arvesse tehnoloogia arengut (vt-koodide optiline lugemine, Internet jne).
Procedures for checking and returning passports to the issuing body should be implemented. 
Tuleks vlja ttada loomapasside kontrollimise ja vljaandnud asutusele tagastamise menetlused.
In addition, identification numbers should be rendered more compatible (paragraphs 38 and 39). 
Lisaks sellele tuleks identifitseerimisnumbrite osas kehtestada rangemad hilduvusnuded (punktid 38Đ39).
C 29/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 97. 
C 29/30 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.2.2005 97.
The on-the-spot checks to be carried out by Member States are not appropriate for all types of keepers of cattle. 
Liikmesriikide teostatavad kohapealsed kontrolle ei ole kohandatud erinevate loomapidajate tpidele.
In this way multiple checks ignore potential synergy effects (paragraphs 42 to 46). 
Nii eirab mitmene kontrollimine snergiast tulenevaid vimalikke mjusid (punktid 42Đ46).
Ń A comparative analysis of the administrative checks in force in the different Member States should result in controls being defined which cover all the conditions governing eligibility for premiums, as well as the cross-checks to be made between the IACS databases and the identification and registration databases before premiums are paid (paragraphs 72 to 74). 
Ń Erinevates liikmesriikides lbiviidavate halduskontrollide vrdlev anals peaks vimaldama mratleda sellised kontrolle, mis hlmaks kiki abiklblikkuse tingimusi lisatasude suhtes ning lisatasude maksmisele eelnevaid ristkontrolle veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi ning htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi andmebaaside vahel (punktid 72Đ74).
In addition, the system of on-the-spot checks should be reviewed (including the penalty mechanisms), approaches which are specific to the type of keeper should be laid down and, especially in the case of farmers, an approach which is fully integrated with IACS should be imposed, while purely welfare matters should be covered by veterinary legislation (paragraphs 43 to 46 and paragraph 71). 98. 
Lisaks sellele tuleks le vaadata kohapealsete kontrollide ssteem (sealhulgas ka karistusmehhanismid), mratleda erinevat tpi loomapidajate suhtes rakendatavad lhenemisviisid ning kehtestada eesktt loomakasvatajate suhtes htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemiga tielikult hilduv lhenemine. Ainult sanitaarksimusi hlmavaid aspekte tuleks ksitleda veterinaariat puudutavates igusaktides (punktid 43Đ46 ja punkt 71).
The legislative arrangements in force in the United Kingdom do not require animals to be identified and registered in accordance with the identification and registration regulation in order to be eligible for payments granted in the case of slaughter and destruction of cattle which are over 30 months old. 
98. hendkuningriigi suhtes kehtivates igusaktides ei nuta loomade identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemis identifitseerimist ja registreerimist, tendamaks nende sobivust le 30 kuu vanuste veiste tapmise ja hvitamise hvitise saamiseks.
Ń The legislation should be amended to guarantee equality of treatment in future between the other Member States and the United Kingdom in the context of the exceptional support measures in connection with BSE (paragraphs 75 to 77). 
Ń Eeskirju tuleks muuta, et tagada tulevikus teiste liikmesriikide ja hendkuningriigi vrdset kohtlemist BSE-ga seonduvate erakorraliste toetusmeetmete rakendamise osas (punktid 75Đ77).
The CourtŐs inquiry, carried out in 2002, at the Community authorities and in four Member States showed that the objective of establishing an effective system of cattle identification and registration at the production stage has not been fully attained. 
Kontrollikoja poolt 2002. aastal henduse asutuste tasandil ja neljas liikmesriigis lbi viidud uurimus nitas, et pstitatud eesmrki, efektiivse veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi rakendamist, ei ole tiel mral saavutatud.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 7 and 8 July 2004. 
Kontrollikoda vttis kesoleva aruande vastu 7. ja 8. juuli 2004. aasta istungil LuxembourgŐis.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/31 SUMMARY I to IV. auditors during their missions carried out from October 2001 to June 2002 in the four Member States concerned. 
4.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 29/31 KOKKUVÍTE I.ĐIV. Komisjon vtab arvesse oktoobrist 2001 kuni juunini 2002 neljas asjaomases liikmesriigis lbi viidud auditi tulemusi.
The Commission has noted the shortcomings in the management of passports for bovine animals which are traded within the Community. 
Komisjon on mrganud puudusi hendusesisese vahetuse objektiks olnud veiste passide haldamisel.
According to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Member States Ômay issue a passport for animals from another Member State. 
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nukogu mruse (E) nr 1760/2000 artikli 6 kohaselt vivad liikmesriigid Ňanda loomapassi ka teisest liikmesriigist prit loomadele.
In such cases, the passport accompanying the animal on its arrival shall be surrendered to the competent authority, which shall return it to the issuing Member State (...) 
Sel juhul loovutatakse loomaga kaasasolev pass looma saabudes pdevale asutusele, kes tagastab selle passi vljaandnud liikmesriigileÓ.
In the case of death of an animal, the passport shall be returned by the keeper to the competent authority within seven days after the death of the animal. 
ŇLooma surma korral tagastab loomapidaja passi pdevale asutusele seitsme peva jooksul prast looma surma.
If the animal is sent to the slaughterhouse, the operator of the slaughterhouse shall be responsible for returning the passport to the competent authorityŐ. The legislator, the Council and the European Parliament, laid down no detailed implementing rules on this issue. 
Kui loom saadetakse tapamajja, vastutab tapamaja valdaja passi tagastamise eest pdevale asutuseleÓ. ksikasjalikke rakenduseeskirju ei ole seadusandja, nukogu ega Euroopa Parlament selles ksimuses ette ninud.
It is the responsibility of Member States to have in place a national database for bovine animals and to ensure that the requirements are met. 
Liikmesriik vastutab selle eest, et oleks olemas riiklik veiste andmebaas, ja tagab nuete titmise.
The database must contain up-to-date information on all bovine animals and all movements whereby the traceability is ensured. 
Andmebaas peab sisaldama ajakohast teavet kikide veiste kohta ja kikide liikumiste kohta, mis tagab jlgitavuse.
Furthermore, with regard to the traceability of animals in intra-Community trade it should be noted that such animals must be accompanied by a health certificate in accordance with Council Directive 64/432/EEC, which includes information on the official individual identification of the animals concerned. 
Lisaks sellele tuleks seoses loomade jlgitavusega hendusesiseses kaubanduses mrkida, et vastavalt nukogu direktiivile 64/432/EM peab hendusesiseses kaubanduses olema veistega kaasas veterinaarsertifikaat, mis sisaldab asjaomase looma ametlikke individuaalseid identifitseerimisandmeid.
V. Responsibility for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 lies with the Member States. 
V. Mruse (E) nr 1760/2000 rakendamise eest vastutavad tegelikult liikmesriigid.
Bovine animals must be identified within a period determined by the Member State as from the date of birth of the animal, at the latest at the age of 20 days and in any event before the animal leaves the holding of birth (Article 4); births, deaths and movements must be notified to the competent authority within a period fixed by the Member State of between three and seven days (Article 7); and passports must be returned to the competent authority by the last keeper (Article 6). 
Veised identifitseeritakse liikmesriigi mratud ajavahemiku jooksul alates looma snnikuupevast kuni hiljemalt 20 peva vanuselt ning igal juhul enne looma lahkumist majandist, kus ta on sndinud (artikkel 4); pdevat asutust teavitatakse sndidest, surmadest ja liikumistest liikmesriigi poolt kehtestatud ajavahemiku jooksul, mis on kolm kuni seitse peva (artikkel 7); viimane pidaja tagastab loomapassid pdevale asutusele (artikkel 6).
However, the Commission has acknowledged the need for precision of the deadline for notification by the keeper of births to the competent authority. 
Siiski on komisjon tunnistanud vajadust tpsustada thtaega, mille jooksul pidaja teavitab sndidest pdevat asutust.
To this effect Regulation (EC) No 911/2004 has been adopted which clarifies this issue. 
Selleks on vastu vetud mrus (E) nr 911/2004, mis selgitab seda ksimust.
The Commission takes note of the auditorsŐ statement that the current provisions for controls and penalties are not adapted to the activity of all categories of keepers. 
Komisjon vtab arvesse audiitorite seisukohta, et kehtivad kontrolli ja sanktsioone ksitlevad stted ei ole kohandatud kigi kategooriate loomapidajate tegevusega.
However, it should be noted that the detailed rules laid down concern the minimum level of controls and the minimum administrative penalties leaving the option open to Member States to go beyond these requirements. 
Siiski tuleb mrkida, et kehtestatud ksikasjalikud eeskirjad ksitlevad kontrollimise miinimumtaset ja minimaalseid haldussanktsioone, mis jtab liikmesriikidele vimaluse olla nendest nuetest rangem.
For controls it is specified that the minimum rate shall be increased immediately when it is established that Community legislation regarding identification has not been complied with. 
Kontrollimise puhul on mratletud, et miinimumtaset suurendatakse kohe, kui on kindlaks tehtud, et identifitseerimist ksitlevaid henduse igusakte ei ole tidetud.
According to the detailed rules for controls, which were laid down in 1997 and codified by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003, the criteria for selecting holdings for on-the-spot inspections must include proper communication of the data to the competent authority. 
1997. aastal stestatud ja komisjoni mrusega (E) nr 1082/2003 kodifitseeritud ksikasjalike kontrollieeskirjade kohaselt vetakse kohapealsete kontrollide jaoks majandite valikul teiste kriteeriumide hulgas arvesse nuetekohast andmete edastust pdevale asutusele.
The legislation places a clear obligation on the Member States to put in place a national database for bovine animals, which should be fully operational by 31 December 1999 and must be able to supply, at any time, the identification number of all animals present on a holding and a list of all movements to and from the holding. 
Íigusaktides on ette nhtud liikmesriikide selge kohustus riikliku veiste andmebaasi loomiseks, mis peaks olema tiesti tvalmis 31. detsembriks 1999 ja peab suutma igal ajal kajastada kigi majandis peetavate loomade identifitseerimisnumbreid ja majandite vahel toimuvate liikumiste nimekirju.
The limited role of the CommissionŐs recognition of the fully operational character of the national databases as laid down in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 is in line with the political choice made by the legislator of having separate national databases in the different Member States instead of a single Community database. 
Mruse (E) nr 1760/2000 artikli 6 likes 3 ette nhtud komisjoni piiratud roll riiklike andmebaaside tieliku tvalmiduse tuvastamisel on koosklas seadusandja poliitilise valikuga luua eri liikmesriikides eraldi riiklikud andmebaasid hise henduse andmebaasi asemel.
It is also clear that harmonisation of the characteristics of the national databases has not been considered a desirable objective by the legislator, which has left the Member States free to design their own databases. 
Samuti on selge, et riiklike andmebaaside omaduste htlustamist ei ole seadusandja pidanud soovitud eesmrgiks, mis on liikmesriikidele oma andmebaasi kavandamisel jtnud vabad ked.
Despite the legal vacuum, the Commission services are pursuing the review and consolidation of the criteria and benchmarks currently used. 
Vaatamata iguslngale, taotlevad komisjoni teenistused hetkel kasutatavate kriteeriumide ja etalonide lbivaatamist ning tugevdamist.
The IACS concerns itself, inter alia, with animals for which CAP premium has been claimed; therefore the only relevant Ôreconciliation controlŐ to be made, is to ensure that such animals appear in the SIEB. 
IACS tegeleb muuhulgas loomadega, kelle jaoks on taotletud PP lisatasu, jrelikult ainus nn vastavuskontroll, mida tuleb teha, on tagada, et need loomad kajastuvad SIEBis. KOMISJONI VASTUSED
C 29/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 In drafting IACS legislation and interpretations thereof, due care has been taken to ensure that aid reductions or exclusions are applied in proportion to the offence and only where appropriate. 
C 29/32 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.2.2005 IACSi igusaktide vljattamisel ja tlgendamisel on nuetekohaselt hoolt kantud, et tagada abi vhendamise ja vlistamise kohaldamine proportsionaalselt igusrikkumisele ja ainult siis, kui asjakohane.
The Commission believes that regulatory controls should be as practical and efficient as possible, whilst providing the necessary financial safeguards. 
Komisjon usub, et iguslikud kontrollid peaksid olema nii praktilised ja thusad kui vimalik, pakkudes vajalikke finantstagatisi.
FINDINGS CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM AT COMMUNITY LEVEL 34. The Commission has adopted detailed rules in all the fields where it has competence under Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
FINDINGS CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM AT COMMUNITY LEVEL 34. The Commission has adopted detailed rules in all the fields where it has competence under Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/33 It should be noted that: Under Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000, Member States may issue a passport for animals from another Member State. 
4.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 29/33 It should be noted that: Under Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000, Member States may issue a passport for animals from another Member State.
C 29/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 53. 
C 29/34 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.2.2005 53.
FINDINGS OF THE COURTŐS AUDITS IN THE MEMBER STATES VISITED 83. 
FINDINGS OF THE COURTŐS AUDITS IN THE MEMBER STATES VISITED 83.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 7/2004 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 41/01) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY ...................................................... 
17.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 41/1 I (Teave) KONTROLLIKODA ERIARUANNE nr 7/2004 toortubakaturu ühise korralduse kohta koos komisjoni vastustega (vastavalt EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 248 lõike 4 punktile 2) (2005/C 41/01) SISUKORD KOMMENTEERITUDKOKKUVÕTE .............................................
INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 
Ühiseturukorralduseeesmärgid ............................................
ObjectivesoftheCMO ................................................... 
ÜHISE TURUKORRALDUSEGA EI OLE JÕUTUD LOODETUD TULEMUSTENI . . . . . . . . . . .
Auditobjectives ........................................................ 
Asjaajamisteisuudetudlihtsustada..........................................
PREPARATIONFORTHE1998REFORM ........................................ 
Menetlusedkontrollitõhustamisekseiandnudtulemusi .........................
Inappropriatepriceagreements............................................. 
Hinnangühiseturukorraldusereformivõimalustele .............................
Non-compliancewithregulations ........................................... 
Kuidas aitaks väljapakutud reform parandada auditis kindlakstehtud puudusi . . . . . . . . .
MONITORINGANDEVALUATIONOFTHEREFORMEDCMO ....................... 
Järeldused .............................................................
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Komisjonivastused.........................................................
C 41/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The EU produces about 5 % of the worldŐs raw tobacco making it the fifth largest producer. 
C 41/2 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja KOMMENTEERITUD KOKKUVÕTE I. EL toodab u 5 % maailma toortubakast, olles seega suuruselt viies tootja.
It exports more than half its own production however, because the aroma and taste of most of the tobacco cultivated is not in demand within the EU. 
Üle poole toodangust aga eks-porditakse, sest suurema osa kasvatatava tubaka aroom ja maitse ei vasta siseturu nõudlusele.
This production is predominantly of Virginia and Burley varieties of neutral aroma and taste used as the main cigarette filler. 
Toodangu põhiosa moodustavad neutraalse aroomi ja maitsega Virginia ja Burley sordid, mida kasutatakse peamise mater-jalina sigarettide valmistamisel.
Smaller quantities of oriental varieties are also grown which have the required aroma and taste in demand. 
Väiksemas koguses kasvatatakse idamaiseid sorte, mille aroom ja maitse vastab nõudlusele.