natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We made recommendations to the Commission in relation to the selection of indicators, the setting of targets, obtaining timely information and the reporting on achievements. 
Esitasime komisjonile soovitusi seoses nitajate valimise, eesmrkide seadmise, igeaegse teabe hankimise ja saavutuste kohta aru andmisega.
Thirty-five special reports across the different areas of EU spending published in 2018 In line with our 2018-2020 strategy, we have been increasing our focus on assessing performance in EU action. 
2018. aastal avaldati ELi eri kuluvaldkondade kohta 35 eriaruannet Vastavalt meie strateegiale aastateks 2018Đ2020 keskendume ha enam ELi tegevuse tulemuslikkuse hindamisele.
In our special reports, we examine whether the objectives of selected EU policies and programmes have been met, whether results have been achieved effectively and efficiently and whether the EU funding has added value Đ i.e. whether it has delivered more than could be achieved with actions at the national level alone. 
Oma eriaruannetes uurime, kas valitud ELi poliitikavaldkondade ja programmide eesmrgid saavutati, kas tulemused olid saavutatud mjusalt ja thusalt ning kas ELi toetusega loodi lisavrtust Đ st kas see andis rohkem tulemusi kui oleks saavutatud ksnes liikmesriikide tasandil vetud meetmetega.
Figure 6 presents all 35 special reports published in 2018. 18 
Joonisel 6 on toodud kik 2018. aastal avaldatud 35 eriaruannet. 18
Figure 6 Đ Special reports published in 2018 19 Our special reports Đ which are mainly performance audits Đ are available in 23 EU languages on our website (eca.europa.eu). 
Joonis 6. 2018. aastal avaldatud eriaruanded 19 Meie eriaruanded, peamiselt tulemusauditid, on ELi 23 keeles kttesaadavad meie veebisaidil (eca.europa.eu).
The Commission implements a high proportion of our recommendations We review annually the extent to which the Commission has taken corrective action related to our recommendations. 
Komisjon viib suure hulga meie soovitustest ellu Uurime igal aastal seda, mil mral on komisjon vtnud meie soovituste alusel parandusmeetmeid.
In line with our strategy for 2018-2020, we will be following up all performance audit recommendations we made to the Commission three years earlier. 
Koosklas meie strateegiaga aastateks 2018Đ2020 kavatseme teha jrelkontrolli kigi tulemusauditi soovituste le, mille oleme kolm aastat varem komisjonile esitanud.
This yearŐs analysis of follow-up covered 184 recommendations issued in the 25 special reports published in 2015. 
Kesoleva aasta soovituste jrelkontrolli anals hlmas 2015. aastal avaldatud 25 eriaruandes esitatud 184 soovitust.
The Commission has implemented 76 % of the recommendations fully or in most respects. 
Komisjon on 76 % soovitustest kas tielikult vi suuremas osas titnud.
We found that 11 recommendations had not been implemented at all (see Figure 7). 
Leidsime, et tiesti titmata on 11 soovitust (vt joonis 7).
Full information on the main findings on the performance of the EU budget can be found in Chapter 3 of our 2018 annual report. 
Tielik teave peamistest leidudest ELi eelarve tulemuslikkuse teemal on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 3. peatkis. 20
A closer look at revenue and spending areas Revenue Ű159.3 billion What we audited Our audit covered the revenue side of the EU budget, which finances the EUŐs expenditure. 
Tulu-ja kuluvaldkondade tpsem levaade Tulud 159,3 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Meie audit hlmas ELi eelarve tulude osa, millega rahastatakse ELi kulusid.
We examined certain key control systems for managing own resources, and a sample of revenue transactions. 
Kontrollisime omavahendite haldamiseks kasutatavaid peamisi ssteeme ja tulutehingutest moodustatud valimit.
Contributions from Member States based on their gross national income (GNI) accounted for 66 % of the EUŐs total revenue in 2018, while revenue from value added tax (VAT) accounted for 11 %. 
Liikmesriikide kogurahvatulul phinevad osamaksed moodustasid 2018. aastal ELi kogutuludest 66 % ja kibemaksul phinevad tulud 11 %.
These contributions are calculated using macroeconomic statistics and estimates provided by Member States. 
Nimetatud maksed arvutatakse liikmesriikide esitatud makromajandusliku statistika ja prognooside alusel.
Traditional own resources (TOR), consisting mainly of customs duties on imports collected by Member State administrations on the EUŐs behalf, provided a further 13 % of EU revenue. 
Lisaks moodustavad traditsioonilised omavahendid (peamiselt impordi tollimaksud, mida koguvad ELi nimel liikmesriikide ametiasutused) veel 13 % ELi tuludest. lejnud 10 % prines muudest allikatest (nt ELi lepingutest ja programmidest tulenevad sissemaksed ja tagasimaksed, viivised ja trahvid ning muud tulud).
What we found Preventive and corrective measures Overall, the revenue-related systems we examined were effective, while the key internal TOR controls we assessed at the Commission and in certain Member States were partially effective. 
Auditi tulemused Ennetus-ja parandusmeetmed Meie kontrollitud tuludega seotud ssteemid olid kokkuvttes thusad; komisjonis ja teatavates liikmesriikides hinnatud traditsiooniliste omavahendite peamised sisekontrollimehhanismid olid osaliselt thusad.
We found that the CommissionŐs inspection plan was not sufficiently supported by a structured and documented risk assessment. 
Leidsime, et komisjoni kontrollikava ei phinenud piisavalt struktureeritud ja dokumenteeritud riskihindamisel.
This affected the CommissionŐs verification of the Member StatesŐ TOR statements. We also found weaknesses in the Member StatesŐ management of customs duties, in particular concerning the compilation of TOR statements, delays in enforcing recovery of customs debts and the late recording of such debts in the accounting system. 
Samuti leidsime puudusi tollimaksude haldamisel liikmesriikides, eelkige seoses traditsiooniliste omavahendite aruannete koostamisega, viivitustega tollivlgade sissenudmisel ja selliste vlgade hilise kajastamisega raamatupidamisssteemis.
In addition, we noted that for the third year in a row, the Commission, in its annual activity report, had set a reservation regarding the accuracy of the value of TOR collected. 
Lisaks theldasime, et kolmandat aastat jrjest esitas komisjon oma aasta tegevusaruandes reservatsiooni kogutud traditsiooniliste omavahendite vrtuse tpsuse kohta.
This resulted from the evasion of customs duties on textile and footwear by some importers. 
Selle phjuseks oli tekstiilitoodete ja jalatsite tollimaksudest krvalehoidumine mningate importijate poolt.
What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: o implement a more structured and documented risk assessment for its TOR inspection planning, including an analysis of each Member StateŐs level of risk and of risks in relation to the drawing up of the accounts on the customs duties; o reinforce the scope of its monthly and quarterly checks of TOR statements by carrying out a deeper analysis of the unusual changes in order to ensure a prompt reaction to potential anomalies. Want to know more? 
Meie soovitused Esitame komisjonile jrgmised soovitused: o rakendada traditsiooniliste omavahendite kontrolli kavandamiseks paremini struktureeritud ja dokumenteeritud riskihindamist, mis hlmab ka analsi iga liikmesriigi riskitaseme ja riskide kohta seoses tollimaksude arvepidamisega; o thustada traditsiooniliste omavahendite aruannete kuu-ja kvartalikontrollide katvust, tehes phjalikumat analsi ebaharilike muutuste kohta, et kiiresti tuvastada vimalikud krvalekalded.
Full information on our audit of EU revenue can be found in Chapter 4 of our 2018 annual report. 22 
Tielik teave meie auditi kohta, mis ksitleb ELi tulusid, on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 4. peatkis. 22
Competitiveness for growth and jobs Total: Ű21.4 billion What we audited Spending programmes in this policy area play an important role in stimulating growth and creating employment in the EU. 
23 Konkurentsivime majanduskasvu ja thive tagamiseks Kokku: 21,4 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Selle poliitikavaldkonna kuluprogrammidel on oluline roll majanduskasvu edendamisel ja tkohtade loomisel ELis.
The Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) and Horizon 2020 (H2020) for research and innovation, and Erasmus+ for education, training, youth and sport account for the bulk of expenditure. 
Seitsmes raamprogramm ja programm ăHorisont 2020Ň teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni valdkonnas ning ăErasmus+Ň hariduse, koolituse, noorte ja spordi valdkonnas moodustavad suurema osa kuludest.
Other programmes provide funding for the space programme Galileo (the EUŐs global satellite navigation system), the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and the International Thermonuclear Reactor. 
Muude programmidega rahastatakse kosmoseprogrammi Galileo (ELi lemaailmne satelliitnavigatsioonissteem), Euroopa hendamise rahastut (CEF) ja rahvusvahelist katsetermotuumareaktorit.
For 2018, expenditure of Ű17.9 billion was subject to audit in this area. 
Selles valdkonnas auditeeriti 2018. aastal 17,9 miljardi euro ulatuses kulutusi.
Most of that amount was directly managed by the Commission and took the form of grants to public or private beneficiaries participating in projects. 
Suuremat osa sellest summast haldas komisjon otse ja see sisaldas projektides osalevatele avaliku vi erasektori toetusesaajatele tehtavaid toetusmakseid.
Research and innovation programmes accounted for 45 % of the spending we audited in 2018. 
Teadus-ja innovatsiooniprogrammid moodustasid 45 % kulutustest, mida me 2018. aastal auditeerisime.
What we found In 2018, 54 of the 130 transactions we examined (42 %) were affected by errors. 
Auditi tulemused 2018. aastal oli 130-st meie poolt kontrollitud tehingust vigadest mjutatud 54 (42 %).
We estimate the most likely level of error to be 2.0 %. 
Meie hinnangul on veamr 2,0 %.
This figure is lower than in 2017, but still considered to be material. 
See nitaja on viksem kui 2017. aastal, kuid seda peetakse endiselt oluliseks.
Preventive and corrective measures As in previous years, the principal risk to the regularity of transactions is that beneficiaries declare ineligible costs, which are neither detected nor corrected before the Commission reimburses them. 
Ennetus-ja parandusmeetmed Nagu varasematel aastatel, seisneb peamine tehingute korrektsusega seotud risk selles, et toetusesaajad deklareerivad rahastamisklbmatuid kulusid, mida enne nende komisjonipoolset hvitamist ei avastata ega parandata.
We found that most errors related to ineligible costs (e.g. travel and equipment costs unconnected with the project), personnel costs not incurred directly for the project, and large research infrastructure costs wrongly declared by beneficiaries. 
Leidsime, et enamik vigu oli seotud rahastamisklbmatute kuludega (nt projektiga mitteseotud reisija seadmekulud), projektiga otseselt mitteseotud personalikuludega ning toetusesaajate poolt valesti deklareeritud suurte teadustaristute kuludega.
23 Amount subject to audit Affected by material error? Estimated most likely level of error Ű17.9 billion Yes 2.0 % (2017: 4.2 %) Example Đ multiple errors in a single claim A small healthcare company participating for the first time in an EU project declared Ű1.1 million in personnel, subcontracting and other costs. 
Hinnanguline kige tenolisem veamr 17,9 miljardit eurot Jah 2,0 % (2017. aastal 4,2 %) Nide Đ mitu viga hes maksetaotluses ks tervishoiuvaldkonna vikeettevte, kes osales ELi projektis esimest korda, deklareeris 1,1 miljoni euro suuruses summas personali-, alltvtu-ja muid kulusid.
The vast majority of the items we examined contained errors. 
Suur enamik kontrollitud kuluartiklitest sisaldas vigu.
In particular, the beneficiary did not use a method to calculate personnel costs in line with H2020 rules. 
Eelkige ei kasutanud toetusesaaja personalikulude arvutamisel meetodit, mis oleks vastanud programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň eeskirjadele.
The Commission had applied corrective measures that directly affected four of the 130 transactions examined. 
Komisjon oli vtnud parandusmeetmeid, mis puudutasid otseselt nelja meie uuritud 130 tehingust.
Without these measures, our estimated level of error for this chapter would have been higher by 0.1 percentage point. 
Ilma nende meetmeteta oleks meie hinnanguline veamr selle peatki kohta olnud 0,1 protsendipunkti vrra krgem.
At the same time, sufficient information was available to prevent, or to detect and correct, eight other cases where we found, and quantified, errors. 
Samas oli olemas piisavalt teavet, et ra hoida vi avastada ja parandada kaheksa muud juhtumit, kus me leidsime kvantifitseeritavaid vigu.
Had this information been used to correct the errors, the estimated overall level of error for spending on ÔCompetitiveness for growth and jobsŐ would have been 0.3 percentage point lower and thus below the materiality threshold. 
Kui seda teavet oleks kasutatud vigade parandamiseks, oleks valdkonna ăKonkurentsivime majanduskasvu ja thive tagamiseksŇ kulude ldine hinnanguline veamr olnud 0,3 protsendipunkti madalam ja seega allpool olulisuse piirmra. ăHorisont 2020Ň ja ăErasmus+Ň Oleme varem mrkinud, et programmil ăHorisont 2020Ň on vrreldes oma eelkija, seitsmenda raamprogrammiga, lihtsamad rahastamiseeskirjad.
In addition, under H2020, beneficiaries can declare capitalised and operating costs for large research infrastructure (LRI) if they comply with certain conditions and have first obtained a positive ex-ante assessment of their costing methodology from the Commission. 
Lisaks sellele saavad toetusesaajad programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň raames deklareerida oma suure teadustaristu kapitaliseeritud ja tegevuskulud, kui need vastavad teatavatele tingimustele ja kui komisjon on andnud nende kuluarvestusmetoodika kohta eelnevalt positiivse hinnangu.
However, this yearŐs audit showed that the ex-ante assessment had little impact on error prevention. 
Selle aasta audit nitas siiski, et eelhindamisel oli vigade ennetamisele vhe mju.
For H2020, we also reviewed audits carried out by both the Commission and contracted external auditors. 
Programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň puhul vaatasime samuti le nii komisjoni enda kui ka lepinguliste vlisaudiitorite tehtud auditid.
In some of the files we reviewed, we found inconsistent sampling approaches and weaknesses in the documentation and reporting of audit findings, as well as in the quality of audit procedures. 
Mne lbivaadatud toimiku puhul leiti ebajrjekindlust valimite moodustamises ja puudusi auditileidude dokumenteerimises ja aruandluses, samuti auditiprotseduuride kvaliteedis.
We also found a methodological weakness relating to the error rate calculation: although ex-post audits rarely achieve their aim of maximum coverage of accepted costs, the error rate is systematically calculated based on all accepted costs instead of the amount actually audited. 
Lisaks leidsime veamra arvutamisel metoodikaalase puuduse: ehkki jrelauditid saavutavad harva oma eesmrgi kontrollida maksimaalselt suurt hulka heakskiidetud kulusid, arvutatakse veamra sstemaatiliselt kigi heakskiidetud kulude, mitte tegelikult auditeeritud summa phjal.
This leads to an understatement of the error rate. For Erasmus+, we note that, like last year, the Education, Audio-visual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) has issued a reservation concerning the effectiveness of its internal controls for managing grants. 
Programmi ăErasmus+Ň puhul mrgime, et sarnaselt eelmisele aastale esitas Hariduse, Audiovisuaalvaldkonna ja Kultuuri Rakendusamet (EACEA) reservatsiooni seoses oma toetuste haldamisega seotud sisekontrollimehhanismide thususega.
In addition, our audits of Erasmus+ projects showed that some national rules were not fully aligned with the principles applied by the EU, in particular as regards maximum amounts payable and funding arrangements. 
Lisaks nitasid programmi ăErasmus+Ň projektide auditid, et mned riigisisesed eeskirjad ei olnud tielikult koosklas ELi kohaldatavate phimtetega, eriti mis puudutab vljamaksmisele kuuluvat maksimummra ja rahastamiskorda.
Commission reporting on legality and regularity The 2018 AAR of the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (DG Research and Innovation), the EACEA and the Executive Agency for SMEs (EASME) gave a fair assessment of their financial management and the regularity of underlying transactions. 
Komisjoni aruandlus seaduslikkuse ja korrektsuse kohta Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraadi, EACEA ning Vikeste ja Keskmise Suurusega Ettevtjate Rakendusamet (EASME) 2018. aasta tegevusaruandes anti iglane hinnang nende finantsjuhtimisele ja selle aluseks olevate tehingute korrektsusele.
Overall, the information they provided corroborated our findings and conclusions. 
Esitatud teave kinnitab ldiselt meie leide ja jreldusi.
Performance assessment We assessed the CommissionŐs reporting on the performance of 50 research and innovation projects in our sample. 
Tulemuslikkuse hindamine Hindasime 50 meie valimisse kuulunud teadus-ja innovatsiooniprojekti tulemuslikkuse kohta koostatud komisjoni aruandlust.
According to the progress reports for these projects, most of them had achieved the expected outputs and results. 
Projektide eduaruannete kohaselt saavutas enamik neist oodatud vljundid ja tulemused.
However, in some cases, the reported progress was only partly in line with the agreed objectives or the reported costs were disproportionate 24 to the progress made. 
Mnel juhul olid aga aruannetes loetletud edusammud kokkulepitud eesmrkidega ainult osaliselt koosklas, vi siis ei olnud teatatud kulud tehtud 24
Furthermore, in some cases, the project outputs and results had not been disseminated as intended. 
Lisaks ei levitatud mnel juhul projektide vljundeid ja tulemusi nii, nagu kavandatud.
What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: o inform SMEs more effectively about the applicable funding rules and carry out more targeted checks of cost claims of SMEs; for the next Research Framework Programme, further simplify the rules for declaring personnel costs and large research infrastructure costs; o for H2020, take measures to address the observations made on ex-post audits concerning sampling consistency, documentation and reporting of audit findings, as well as the quality of audit procedures; and o promptly address the findings of the CommissionŐs Internal Audit service concerning: (i) the EACEAŐs internal control systems on the grant management process for Erasmus+; and (ii) the monitoring of compliance with contractual obligations and reporting requirements on dissemination and exploitation in research and innovation projects. .. 
Meie soovitused Esitame komisjonile jrgmised soovitused: o parandada VKEde teavitamist kohaldatavatest rahastamiseeskirjadest ja kontrollida sihiprasemalt VKEde maksetaotlusi; lihtsustada veelgi jrgmise teadusuuringute raamprogrammi personalikulude ja suurte teadustaristute kulude deklareerimist; o vtta programmi ăHorisont 2020Ň raames meetmeid, et krvaldada jrelauditites avastatud puudused, mis puudutavad valimite moodustamise jrjepidevust, auditileidude dokumenteerimist ja aruandlust ning auditiprotseduuride kvaliteeti; o vtta viivitamata meetmeid komisjoni siseauditi talituse thelepanekute suhtes, mis puudutavad i) EACEA sisekontrollissteeme programmi ăErasmus +Ň toetuste haldamise protsessi jaoks; ii) selle jlgimist, kas toetusesaajad jrgivad lepingulisi kohustusi ning aruandlusnudeid, mis on seotud teadus-ja innovatsiooniprojektide tulemuste levitamise ja kasutamisega. Soovite tiendavat teavet?
Want to know more? Full information on our audit of EU expenditure on ÔCompetitiveness for growth and jobsŐ can be found in Chapter 5 of our 2018 annual report. 
Tielik teave meie auditi kohta, mis ksitleb ELi kulutusi valdkonnas ăKonkurentsivime majanduskasvu ja thive tagamiseksŇ, on esitatud meie 2018. aasta aastaaruande 5. peatkis.
25 26 Economic, social and territorial cohesion Total: Ű54.5 billion What we audited Spending under this policy area focuses on reducing development disparities between the different Member States and regions of the EU and strengthening competitiveness. 
25 26 Majanduslik, sotsiaalne ja territoriaalne htekuuluvus Kokku: 54,5 miljardit eurot Mida me auditeerisime Selle poliitikavaldkonna kulutuste eesmrk on ELi eri liikmesriikide ja regioonide arengutaseme vaheliste erinevuste vhendamine ning konkurentsivime parandamine.
These objectives are implemented mainly through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund (CF) and the European Social Fund (ESF), which involves the co-financing of multiannual operational programmes (OP) from which projects are funded. 
Neid eesmrke tidavad peamiselt Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fond (ERF), htekuuluvusfond (F) ja Euroopa Sotsiaalfond (ESF). Eesmrkide hulka kuulub ka selliste mitmeaastaste rakenduskavade kaasrahastamine, millest rahastatakse projekte.
The management of expenditure is shared by the Commission and the Member States. 
Kulusid haldab komisjon koosts liikmesriikidega.
Within the Commission, the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG Regional and Urban Policy) is responsible for implementing the ERDF and the CF, and the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion) for the ESF. 
Komisjonis vastutab ERFi ja Fi rakendamise eest regionaal-ja linnapoliitika peadirektoraat ning ESFi rakendamise eest thive, sotsiaalksimuste ja sotsiaalse kaasatuse peadirektoraat.
In 2018, expenditure that was subject to our audit in this area amounted to Ű23.6 billion and was significantly higher than in 2017 (Ű8.0 billion). 
2018. aastal auditeerisime selles valdkonnas kulutusi 23,6 miljardi euro suuruses summas, mida on tunduvalt rohkem kui 2017. aastal (8,0 miljardit eurot).
We examine payments once expenditure has been incurred, recorded and accepted. 
Me auditeerime makseid, kui kulud on kantud, kirjendatud ja heaks kiidetud.
In line with this approach the amount subject to audit for the 2018 annual report also included Ű16.5 billion worth of expenditure from previous years that the Commission had accepted or cleared in 2018. 
Selle lhenemisviisi kohaselt hlmas 2018. aasta aruande jaoks auditeeritud summa ka 16,5 miljardi euro vrtuses eelmiste aastate kulusid, mille komisjon oli 2018. aastal heaks kiitnud vi tasaarvestanud.
Payments made in 2018 amounting to Ű47.4 billion and relating to expenditure it had not yet accepted, were not part of our audit population. 
Meie andmekogum ei hlmanud makseid, mida tehti 2018. aastal summas 47,4 miljardit eurot ja mis olid seotud kulutustega, mida komisjon ei olnud veel heaks kiitnud.
What we found Preventive and corrective measures In 2018, we drew a statistically representative sample of 220 transactions which Member States audit authorities had already examined. 
Auditi tulemused Ennetus-ja parandusmeetmed Koostasime 2018. aastal statistiliselt esindusliku valimi 220 tehingust, mida liikmesriikide auditeerimisasutused olid juba uurinud.
We found and quantified 36 errors in these 220 transactions. 
Leidsime ja kvantifitseerisime neis 220 tehingus 36 viga.
The management and audit authorities in the Member States had not detected these errors. 
Liikmesriikide korraldus-ja auditeerimisasutused ei olnud neid vigu avastanud.
Taking account of the 60 errors that the audit authorities had found, and the financial corrections applied by programme authorities (amounting to a total of Ű314 million for the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming period taken together), we estimate the level of error to be 5.0 %. 
Vttes arvesse auditeerimisasutuste leitud 60 viga ja rakenduskavu haldavate asutuste kohaldatud korrektsioone (kogusummas 314 miljonit eurot programmit perioodide 2007Đ2013 ja 2014Đ 2020 peale kokku), on veamr meie hinnangul 5,0 %.
Estimated most likely level of error Ű23.6 billion Yes 5.0 % (2017: 3.0 %) 
Hinnanguline kige tenolisem veamr 23,6 miljardit eurot Jah 5,0 % (2017. aastal 3,0 %)