natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Belgium, not all types of movement were recorded in the database and the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly. 
Belgias ei registreeritud loomade kiki liikumisi andmebaasis ning pdeval ametiasutusel puudus vimalus esinevate vigade ja lnkade kiireks parandamiseks vi titmiseks.
In the Netherlands, the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly, the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths was more than seven days and the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 were not applied correctly. 
Madalmaades puudus pdeval ametiasutusel vimalus esinevate vigade ja lnkade kiireks parandamiseks vi titmiseks; liikumisest, snnist ja surmast teatamise thtaeg oli pikem kui seitse peva ning lisaks sellele ei olnud mruse (E) nr 2630/97 stteid nuetekohaselt rakendatud.
In Austria, not all animal movements were registered, there were delays in corrections of errors and national legislation on deadlines for reporting movements was not complied with. 
Austrias ei registreeritud andmebaasis loomade kiki liikumisi, vigade parandamine toimus hilinemisega ning ei jrgitud riiklikke igusakte loomade liikumisest teatamiseks kehtestatud thtaegade osas.
In Sweden, neither slaughterings nor movements to knackersŐ yards were reported. 
Rootsis ei laienenud teatamiskohustus tapamajadele ega loomade liikumisele kogumispunktidesse.
They were also to improve the procedures for authentification and validation of passports. 
Ametiasutustel paluti samuti tiustada loomapasside autentsuse ja kehtivuse tuvastamisega seonduvaid menetlusi.
In France, the authorities were recommended to reduce the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths to seven days, to record all animal movements and to correct rapidly any error or omission discovered during on-the-spot checks. 
Prantsusmaal paluti vhendada liikumistest ja snnist ning surmast teatamiseks kehtestatud ajavahemikku seitsmele pevale, registreerida andmebaasis loomade kik liikumised ning vimaldada kohapealse kontrolli kigus tuvastatud vigade ja lnkade kiiret parandamist ja vi titmist.
The conditions entered in the CommissionŐs decisions recognising the fully operational character of the databases and the findings of the Food and Veterinary Office and the Directorate-General for Agriculture concerning cattle identification and registration did not guarantee that the system in place allowed the conditions required by the legislation to be verified, in respect of reporting deadlines, the absence of reports, or penalties. 
Komisjoni otsustes andmebaaside tieliku kasutuselevtu kohta sisalduvad tingimused, Veterinaar-ja Toiduameti ning pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi tehtud mrkused veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise kohta ei taga seda, et kasutuseleve-tud ssteem vimaldaks kontrollida teatamisthtaegade, mittetea-tamiste vi karistuste osas igusaktidega mratletud tingimusi.
The sole purpose of the decision to recognise the fully operational character of a database was to confirm that the database was fully operational in the technical sense. 
Andmebaasi kasutuselevtu tunnustamise ainsaks eesmrgiks oli tendada, et andmebaas ttab tehniliselt vastavalt kehtestatud korrale.
Furthermore, the Commission has not applied precise management rules or predefined quality indicators as to the basis for its evaluation of the actual operation of the databases. 
Lisaks sellele ei ole komisjon andnud ssteemi tegeliku toimimise hinnangut lhtuvalt ksikasjalikest halduseeskirjadest vi eelnevalt mratletud kvaliteedikriteeriumi-dest.
The practical operation and ultimate reliability of the database thus depend on the keepers who are to input complete data and update the base rapidly. 
Kuid andmebaasi tegelik toimimine ja selles sisalduvate andmete lplik usaldusvrsus sltuvad loomapidajatest, kes peavad andmebaasi varustama ammendavate ja ajakohastatud andmetega.
In addition, all decisions recognising databases to be fully operational contain conditions with suspensive effect linked to a formal commitment by the Member States concerned to make a certain number of improvements to the operation of the databases before the date on which formal recognition comes into effect. 
Lisaks sellele sisaldavad kik andmebaaside kasutuselevtu tunnustamisotsused justumist edasilkkavaid tingimusi, mis seonduvad asjassepuutuvate liikmesriikide kohustustega teha enne ametliku tunnustuse justumist andmebaasidesse teatud hulk parandusi.
Since 2001, the Commission has undertaken to monitor, systematically, whether the recommendations issued have actually been implemented. 
Alates 2001. aastast on komisjon tegelenud sstemaatilise jrelevalvega esitatud soovituste jrgimise osas.
Since 2001, the Food and Veterinary Office has carried out various audit missions concerning traceability, and the findings are taken into account in the evaluation of the design and functioning of the databases. 
Alates 2001. aastast on Veterinaar-ja Toiduamet korraldanud liikumiste jlgitavuse kohta mitmeid auditikike, mille jooksul tuvastatud leidudega arvestatakse andmebaaside lesehituse ja toimimise hindamisel.
Although this approach has been adopted, it was not applied at the time of the first evaluations of the operational character of the databases. 
Kuigi selline lhenemine on heaks kiidetud, et kasutatud seda andmebaaside toimimise esmakordsel hindamisel.
For this reason the Commission is attaching greater importance to the database recognition procedure and to the role it can play in this field. 
Seetttu prab komisjon endisest enam thelepanu andmebaaside tunnustamise menetlusele ja selle rollile.
At the beginning of 2004, the databases of nine Member States and that of Northern Ireland had been recognised by the Commission, on the dates shown in table 5. 
2004. aasta alguse seisuga oli komisjon tunnustanud heksa liikmesriigi ja Phja-Iirimaa andmebaase, kuupevad on esitatud tabelis 5.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/21 Table 5 Dates of Commission decisions recognising the fully operational character of databases Member State (or region) Decision 1999/317/EC 1999/375/EC 1999/376/EC 1999/377/EC 1999/546/EC 1999/571/EC 1999/693/EC 1999/696/EC France Germany 2002/67/EC Date of decision Finland Actual date of recognition 1 May 1999 1 August 1999 1 October 1999 1 July 1999 1 October 1999 1 October 1999 1 November 1999 1 November 1999 2 September 2001 Not specified 62. the draft recognition decision has been suspended by the Commission. 
4.2.2005 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 29/21 Tabel 5 Andmebaaside tielikku kasutuselevttu tunnustavate komisjoni otsuste kuupevad Soome Liikmesriik (vi regioon) Tunnustamise justumiskuupev 1.5.1999 1.8.1999 1.10.1999 1.7.1999 1.10.1999 1.10.1999 1.11.1999 1.11.1999 2.9.2001 Tpsustamata 62. kuningriik) on tunnustamisotsuse justumine komisjoni poolt edasi lkatud. Otsuse menetlemise edasilkkamise phjused on seotud asjassepuutuvate liikmesriikidega. Lisaks sellele on kaks liikmesriiki hakanud ise kasutama tunnustamisega seonduvaid soodustusi, alandades kohapeal lbiviidavate kontrollide mra kmnelt protsendilt viiele, ja seda ilma komisjoni ametliku tunnustamisotsuseta.
This is counter to the objectives of the legislation which, from the outset, combined health regulation and premium management objectives. Luxembourg Denmark Belgium Netherlands Austria Sweden United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) 5 11 28 April 1999 19 May 1999 19 May 1999 19 May 1999 13 July 1999 28 July 1999 October 1999 October 1999 2001/399/EC 7 May 2001 28 January 2002 61. 
Otsus 1999/317/E 1999/375/E 1999/376/E 1999/377/E 1999/546/E 1999/571/E 1999/693/E 1999/696/E Prantsusmaa Saksamaa 2002/67/E Otsuse kuupev 28.4.1999 19.5.1999 19.5.1999 19.5.1999 13.7.1999 28.7.1999 5.10.1999 11.10.1999 7.5.2001 28.1.2002 Luksemburg Taani Belgia Madalmaad Austria Rootsi hendkuningriik (Phja-Iirimaa) 2001/399/E 61.
The databases of six Member States had still not been recognised at the beginning of 2004. 
2004. aasta alguse seisuga ei ole kuue liikmesriigi andmebaase veel tunnustatud.
These were Greece, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom (Great Britain). 
Nendeks liikmesriikideks on Kreeka, Hispaania, Iirimaa, Itaalia, Portugal ja hendkuningriik (Suurbri-tannia).
The situation is set out in detail in box 7. 
Olukorra ksikasjalik kirjeldus on esitatud lahtris 7.
Box 7 In the case of Portugal, the Commission has suspended the draft recognition decision as from the date of their visit on 19 October 2000, because of the weaknesses found during the visit by DG SANCO inspectors. 
Lahter 7 Portugali suhtes lkkas komisjon tunnustamisotsuse eelnu menetlemise edasi prast klastust 2000. aasta 19. oktoobril.
The Spanish authorities returned the CommissionŐs questionnaire on 24 July 2001. 
Hispaania ametiasutused tagastasid komisjoni ksimustiku 24. juulil 2001.
They claimed they were ready for the CommissionŐs visit in connection with the official recognition of their database, but asked that the date on which recognition took effect should be the date on which the questionnaire was sent to the Commission. 
Nad teatasid, et on valmis komisjoni klastuseks andmebaasi ametlikuks tunnustamiseks, kuid avaldasid soovi, et tegeliku tunnustamise alguseks loetaks ksimustiku komisjonile tagasisaatmise kuupev.
Since 2002, the rate of on-the-spot checks has been reduced to 5 %. 
Alates 2002. aastast on kohapeal lbi viidavate kontrollide osakaal vhenenud viie protsendini.
The Commission visited Great Britain on 20 and 21 November 2001. 
Komisjon klastas Suurbritanniat 20. ja 21. novembril 2001.
A draft decision was drawn up proposing 1 April 2002 as the date on which the decision should come into effect, but here, too, the Commission has suspended the decision because of weaknesses found during an inspection. In a letter of 23 January 2002, the Irish authorities simply informed the Commission that their database was fully operational and for this reason they were reducing the rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 %. 
Koostati otsuse eelnu, mille kohaselt oleks justumisajaks 1. aprill 2002, kuid ka sel juhul lkkas komisjon kohapeal tuvastatud puuduste tttu justumisaja edasi 23. jaanuari 2002. aasta kirjas teatasid Iirimaa ametiasutused komisjonile lihtsalt, et nende andmebaas on tielikult kasutusele vetud ning et seetttu vhendavad nad kohapeal lbiviidavate kontrollide mra kmnelt protsendilt viiele.
As far as Italy is concerned, the Commission received the completed standard questionnaire on 28 February 2002. 
Itaalia tagastas korrakohase ksimustiku komisjonile 28. veebruaril 2002.
The Italian authorities said that they were ready to receive the CommissionŐs visit for official recognition of their database. 
Itaalia ametiasutused on kinnitanud, et nad on valmis vastu vtma komisjoni delegatsiooni andmebaasi ametlikuks tunnustamiseks.
In a letter of 24 July 2001, the Greek authorities informed the Commission about their plans for setting up the database, which was scheduled to become operational in June 2002. 
24. juuli 2001. aasta kirjas teatasid Kreeka ametiasutused komisjonile, et nad kavandavad andmebaasi loomist ning et andmebaasi tegelik rakendamine on kavandatud 2002. aasta juunisse.
C 29/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 64. 
C 29/22 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.2.2005 64.
The Commission recognised the database for Northern Ireland as fully operational as from 1 November 1999. 
Komisjon tunnustas Phja-Iirimaa andmebaasi tielikku kasutuselevttu 1. novembril 1999.
The setting-up of two separate databases in the United Kingdom and the individual recognition of one of them by the Commission is not in conformity with Community legislation. 
Kahe andmebaasi kasutuselevtt hendkuningriigis ning neist he eraldi tunnustamine komisjoni poolt ei ole henduse igusaktidega koosklas.
Supervision by the Commission 65. 
Komisjoni jrelevalve 65.
Until 1999 responsibility for identification and registration lay with DG Agriculture. 
Identifitseerimise ja registreerimise valdkonna pdevaks ametiasutuseks oli kuni 1999. aastani pllumajanduse peadirektoraat.
Since then, the responsibility has been transferred to the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection (1). 
Alates 1999. aastast lks pdevus selles valdkonnas le tervise ja tarbijakaitse peadirektoraadile.
Nevertheless, it is DG Agriculture (IACS) which is responsible for control and payment of animal premiums. 
(1) Samas on loomakasvatusega seotud lisatasude maksmise ja kontrolli pdevaks ametiasutuseks pllumajanduse peadirektoraat (htne haldus-ja kontrollissteem).
Since 1999 it has only been possible for animal premiums for cattle to be paid if the cattle in question have been correctly identified and registered in the Community system (2). These two Directorates-General are therefore required to supervise the Community identification and registration system. The IACS legislation, like the legislation on the identification system, allows Member States to reduce the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 % when the national database is fully operational and has allowed effective cross-checks to be carried out within the IACS framework for more than one year (3). 
Alates 1999. aastast vib lisatasusid maksta ksnes veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemis nuetekohaselt identifitseeritavate ja registreeritud veiste kohta. (2) Seega tegeleb veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi jrelevalvega kaks peadirektoraati. htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemiga seonduvad igusaktid, niteks igusaktid veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi kohta, vimaldavad liikmesriikidel langetada minimaalsete kohapeal teostatavate kontrollide mra kmnelt protsendilt viiele, kui riiklik andmebaas on tielikult kasutusele vetud ja selle andmete kohta saab teha efektiivset ristkontrolli htses haldus-ja kontrollissteemis he aasta ulatuses.
66. 
(3) 66.
Health and Consumer Protection DG is in charge of the procedure for recognising the fully operational character of the national databases (see paragraphs 55 to 62) and is also responsible for monitoring the statistics of on-the-spot identification and registration checks which Member States are required to draw up (see paragraph 46). 
Tervise ja tarbijakaitse peadirektoraat vastutab riiklike andmebaaside tieliku kasutuselevtu tunnustamise menetluse eest (vt punktid 55Đ62) ning jrelevalve eest veiste identifitseerimise ja jrelevalve ssteemi raames lbiviidavate kohapealsete kontrollide statistika osas, mille koostamise kohustus on pandud liikmesriikidele (vt punkt 46).
The Food and Veterinary Office is part of Health and Consumer Protection DG and is responsible for routine monitoring of the identification and registration system. 
Veterinaar-ja Toiduamet, mis kuulub tervise ja tarbijakaitse peadirektoraadi koosseisu, tegeleb veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi ldise jrelevalvega.
At the beginning of 2002 the Food and Veterinary Office began a series of audit (1) Health and Consumer Protection DG has legislative responsibilities in the food, veterinary, phytosanitary and public health fields. 
2002. aasta (1) Tervise-jatarbijakaitsepeadirektoraadiigusjrgseksvastutusalakson toiduained, veterinaar-ja ftosanitaarksimused ning tervishoid.
Health and Consumer Protection DG is the result of the reorganisation of several units from three Directorates-General (DG III - Internal Market, DG VI - Agriculture and DG XXIV - Consumer Protection). 
Tervise-ja tarbijakaitse peadirektoraat moodustati kolme peadirektoraadi (III peadirektoraat Ń siseturg, VI peadirektoraat Ń pllumajandus ja XXIV peadirektoraat Ń tarbijakaitse) mitme allksuse henda-misega.
(2) Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999. 
(2) Mruse (E) nr 1254/1999 artikkel 21.
(3) Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001. visits to the Member States to evaluate the conduct of the checks on the traceability of beef and beef products. 
(3) Mruse (E) nr 2419/2001 artikkel 18. alguses kivitas Veterinaar-ja Toiduamet liikmesriikides mitmeid auditikike, mille eesmrgiks oli anda hinnang veiseliha ja veiselihatoodete jlgitavuse kontrollile.
The reports containing the observations and recommendations are subject to contradictory procedures between the Office and the Member States, and the final report is published on the CommissionŐs Internet site. 
Mrkusi ja soovitusi sisaldavad aruanded arutati lbi ameti ja liikmesriikide poolt kahepoolsetel lbirkimiste kigus ning lpparuanne avaldati komisjoni kodulehekljel.
The Food and Veterinary Office visits the 15 Member States over a period of 12 months in connection with this work. 
Nende tde teostamiseks klastasid Veterinaar-ja Toiduameti esindajad 12 kuu jooksul viitteist liikmesriiki.
DG Agriculture is involved at Member State level as part of the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Pllumajanduse peadirektoraat sekkub liikmesriikide toimingutesse raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise menetluse tasandil.
Negligence in the organisation of identification checks may also be detected, such as an absence of checks on keepers other than those applying for premiums or failure to communicate the results of checks between the departments responsible for managing premiums and those in charge of identification. 
Samuti on vimalik tuvastada puudusi identifitseerimise kontrolli korralduses, kontrolli puudumist muude loomapidajate kohta, kes ei taotle lisatasusid, samuti kontrollitulemuste mitteedastamist lisatasude haldamise ja identifitseerimisega tegelevate osakondade vahel.
69. Coordination of the work of the various Commission departments involved in the Member States has improved with time. 
69. henduse erinevate asutuste esindajate t koordineerimine liikmesriikides on aja jooksul paranenud.
However, as there are no quantified quality indicators that are used by all those involved, they have no means of assessing whether the national databases are acceptable or not. 
Samas, kuivrd puuduvad mdetavad kvaliteedinitajad, mida kasutaksid kik osapooled, ei ole henduse teenistustel vrdlusalust riiklike andmebaaside nuetekohasuse le otsustamiseks.
With the exception of the weaknesses discussed in paragraphs 44 and 92, the statistics drawn up by Member States on on-the-spot checks on identification and registration are not analysed or used as a tool for guidance by the Commission (see table 6). 
Liikmesriikide koostatud veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi raames lbiviidud kohapealsete kontrollide statistikat ei ole lisaks punktides 44 ja 92 esitatud puudustele ka analsitud ega kasutatud komisjonipoolse abivahendina (vt tabel 6).
The data concerning Ôpenalties imposedŐ do not allow comparison of Member States, as the information forwarded has not been standardised; some Member States provide the number of penalties imposed (BE, IT), others the number of holdings and animals to which penalties are applied (FR, LU, PT, FI, UK-GB), or merely the number of holdings penalised (DK), or the number of cattle subject to penalties (SE); one Member State gives the number of cases subject to legal proceedings (ES). 
NB 2: Kohaldatud sanktsioone puudutavad andmed ei vimalda liikmesriike vrrelda, sest saadetud teave pole htne; teatud liikmesriigid esitasid kohaldatud karistuste arvu (Belgia, Itaalia), teised aga majandite ja loomade arvu, kelle suhtes kohaldati karistusi (Prantsusmaa, Luksemburg, Portugal, Soome, hendkuningriik), vi ksnes karistatud majandite arvu (Taani), vi karistuste phjuseks olnud loomade arvu (Rootsi), vi on liikmesriik andnud juhtumite arvu (Hispaania).
Greece has not yet implemented the Integrated Administration and Control System. 
NB 3: Kreekas ei ole veel rakendatud haldus-ja kontrollissteemi.
No statistics are available. the Annual Reports required by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2630/97. 
Allikas: Komisjoni mruse (E) nr 2630/97 phjal esitatud aastaaruanded. hendkuningriik
C 29/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 71. 
C 29/24 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.2.2005 71.
The legislation on that system, like other veterinary provisions, does not lay down any financial penalties in the case of non-compliance with the rules in force. 
Veiste identifitseerimise ja registreerimise ssteemi aluseks olevad igusaktid, nagu ka muud veterinaaria alased stted, ei sisalda mingeid rahalisi sanktsioone kehtivate eeskirjade eiramise korral.
The work of DG Agriculture may thus result in financial corrections (1) in cases where serious anomalies relating specifically to identification are found during audits. 
Seega vib pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi tegevus tuua kaasa muudatusi rahaeraldistes, (1) kui kontrolli kigus tuvastatakse tsiseid identifitseerimisega seotud krvalekaldeid.
Inconsistencies in the management of premiums Bovine premiums subject to controls in the context of the Integrated Administration and Control System 72. The legislation on the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) stipulates that Member States are to carry out administrative checks to verify that the conditions of eligibility for the granting of aid and premiums are fulfilled. 
Vastuolud lisatasude haldamisel Veisekasvatajatele makstavad lisatasud, mis on llitatud htsesse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi 72. htse haldus-ja kontrollissteemi aluseks olevates igusaktides stestatakse, et liikmesriigid viivad lbi halduskontrolli, mis vimaldab tagada abiklblikkuse tingimustele vastavuse toetuste ja lisatasude eraldamisel.
73. 
(2) 73.
The Commission ensures that all the Member States put administrative checks in place. 
Komisjon jlgib, et liikmesriigid rakendaks nimetatud halduskontrolli.
The Commission has provided a precise definition of the administrative checks to be carried out in the context of bovine premiums by breaking the checks down into key checks and auxiliary checks. 
Komisjon on vga tpselt mratlenud sooritatava halduskontrolli korra, kontrollid on jagatud veisekasvatuse sektoris lbiviidavaks phikontrolliks ja lisakontrolliks.
Box 8 below shows examples of movement anomalies. (1) The clearance of accounts procedure provides for financial corrections equivalent to the amount of the risk incurred for Community funds. 
Lahtris 8 on esitatud levaade loomade liikumisega seonduvatest krvalekalletest. (1) Raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollimise ja heakskiitmise menetluses nhakse ette finantskorrigeerimisi henduse fondide poolt kaetavate riskisummade ulatuses.
(2) Article 16(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001. 
(2) Mruse (E) nr 2419/2001 artikli 16 lige b.
Box 8 Examples of movement anomalies: an off-farm movement which is not followed by any entry record by another keeper (farmer, trader, slaughterhouse, etc.), a date of exit after the date of entry at the next farm, gaps between the date of exit recorded by one keeper and the date of entry recorded by the next keeper (possibility that an intermediate movement has not been recorded, with resultant loss of audit trail). 
Lahter 8 Niteid loomade liikumisega seonduvatest krvalekalletest: teade majandist vljaveo kohta, millele ei jrgne teise loomapidaja (pllumajandustootja, kaubastaja, tapamaja) teadet sisseveo kohta, teade majandist vljaveo kohta, mille kuupev on hilisem kui teise majandisse sisseveo kuupev, ajavahe he loomapidaja poolt registreeritud vljaveo ja jrgmise loomapidaja poolt registreeritud sisseveo vahel (on seotud looma vahepealse liikumise registreerimine puudumisega, tuues kaasa looma liikumise jlgitavuse kadumise).
Exceptional support measures for the beef market following the BSE crisis 75. 
Veiste spongioosse entsefalopaatia (BSE) kriisi tttu veiselihaturule kohaldatavad lisatoetusmeetmed 75.
During the BSE crisis in 1996 the Commission introduced a regulation which was applicable exclusively in the United Kingdom (3) and provided for the slaughter and destruction of cattle over 30 months old. 
1996. aasta BSE kriisi kigus kehtestas komisjon ksnes hendkuningriigile laieneva mruse, mille kohaselt kuulusid kik le 30 kuu vanused veised tapmisele ja hvitamisele.