natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Neither OLAF nor the Directorate-General for Agriculture has maintained records of such accounts written off, nor reconciled them with the amounts of the related clearance-of-accounts corrections. 
Ei OLAF ega pllumajanduse peadirektoraat ei silitanud andmeid selliste kustutamiste kohta ega viinud andmeid vastavusse andmetega seotud raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrolli ja heakskiitmise korrektsioonide summadega.
The total amount written off in this way is therefore not known. 
Seetttu on kogu sellisel viisil kustutatud summa suurus teadmata.
(2) Five files could not be found; four cases had been treated as being already covered by flat rate corrections and in one case the amount had been charged to the budget not to the Member State. 
(2) Viit toimikut ei suudetud leida, nelja juhtumit ksitleti juba kaetuna kindlasummalise korrektsiooniga ja hel juhul kanti summa eelarve vahendite arvele, mitte liikmesriigi kuludesse.
(3) For example, bankruptcy or winding up orders. 
(3) Nt pankroti-vi likvideerimiskorraldused.
(4) There were reasoned arguments in eight of the 30 files examined. 
(4) Analsitud 30 toimikust kaheksa olid phjendatult argumenteeritud.
Live bovine animals for slaughter, exported to Poland with refunds in 1990, were misdeclared as pure-bred animals with resulting irregular payments in three cases of 2,6 million euro. 
1990. aastal eksporditoetustega Poolasse tapmiseks eksporditud elusveised deklareeriti vralt kui tupuhtad loomad, phjustades kolmel juhul eeskirjade vastaseid makseid 2,6 miljoni euro ulatuses.
These cases were excluded from a clearance-of-accounts financial correction in 1994 for similar cases pending the result of recovery action. 
Need juhtumid eemaldati 1994. aastal samasuguste sissenudmise tulemust ootavate juhtumite raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrolli ja heakskiitmise finantskorrektsioo-nist.
In 1999 the Court of Justice upheld the CommissionŐs financial correction. 
1999. aastal kinnitas Euroopa Kohus komisjoni finantskorrektsiooni.
The Commission has since however failed to follow up the three cases excluded. 
Komisjonil ei ole prast seda siiski nnestunud kolme eemaldatud juhtumit edasi ksitleda.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/11 49. 
4.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 269/11 49.
OLAF initiated a special exercise in March 1999 to examine pre-1996 amounts to be recovered. 
OLAF algatas 1999. aasta mrtsis erianalsi 1996. aastale eelnevate ja sissenudmisele kuuluvate summade kohta.
Old cases were defined as cases with administrative delays exceeding four years and/or judicial delays exceeding eight years (1). 
Vanad juhtumid mratleti kui administratiivsed viivitused, mis letasid nelja aastat, ja/vi kohtulikud viivitused, mis letasid kaheksat aastat.
Those less than 50 000 euro were to be subject to a less rigorous review. 
Juhtumeid, kus tasumata summa oli alla 50 000 euro, ksitleti viksema rangusega.
The Commission Decision (2) on these cases was published on 28 June 2003. 
Komisjoni otsus (2) nende juhtumite kohta avaldati 28. juunil 2003.
The amount of 69,4 million euro was written off against the budget and 5,3 million charged to Member States. 
69,4 miljonit eurot kustutati ELi eelarve summadest ja 5,3 miljonit eurot kanti liikmesriikide kuludesse.
Italian cases, which account for 66 % (750 million euro) of the amount to be recovered for pre-1995 cases, were excluded from the recommendations and decision. 
Soovitustes ja otsuses ei ksitletud Itaalia juhtumeid, mis moodustasid 66 % (750 miljonit eurot) 1995. aastale eelnenud juhtumite puhul sissenudmisele kuuluvatest summadest.
As was the case for recommendations made under the normal procedure, there was no systematic analysis in the files of the reasons leading to the recommendations. 
Nagu ka tavamenetluse raames tehtud soovituste puhul, ei analsitud toimikutes soovituste aluseks olevaid phjendusi sstemaatiliselt.
The Commission has now set up a task force to examine pre-1999 cases for amounts in excess of 500 000 euro. 
Komisjon on ndseks moodustanud eritrh-ma, et uurida enne 1999. aastat aset leidnud juhtumeid vrtuses le 500 000 euro. lesannete jagunemine komisjonis 52.
As explained above, OLAF manages the ECR database. 
Nagu eespool selgitatud, haldab OLAF komisjoni andmebaasi.
The Directorate-General for Agriculture is responsible for clearance-of-accounts decisions. 
Pllumajanduse peadirektoraat vastutab raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollija heakskiitmisotsuste eest.
There are instances in which this division of responsibilities causes problems of communication: (a) there was no provision for the Directorate-General for Agriculture to transmit systematically to OLAF copies of all clearance decisions whereby Member States have been charged with the financial consequences of irregularities. 
Mnedel juhtudel phjustab see kohustuste lahusus teabevahetusprobleeme: a) pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi kohustus edastada OLAFile kontrollija heakskiitmisotsuste koopiaid, mille alusel kanti eeskirjade eiramiste finantstagajrjed liikmesriikide kuludesse, ei olnud hegi igusaktiga reguleeritud.
Consequently there was no systematic evidence in the OLAF files that the amounts recorded as having been charged to Member States had actually been recovered under the clearance-of-accounts procedure; (b) the 1995 decision (3) to write off amounts against the budget was not reflected in the ECR database. 
Seetttu ei olnud OLAFi toimikutes sstemaatilisi andmeid selle kohta, et liikmesriikide kuludena kirjendatud summad on raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrollija heakskiitmismenetluses tegelikult sisse nutud; b) 1995. aasta otsus (3) kustutada summasid eelarvevahendite arvelt ei kajastunud komisjoni andmebaasis. Seeprast uuriti knealuseid juhtumeid 2003. aastal uuesti ja mne juhtumi osas oli otsus 1995. aasta otsusele vastupidine; c) mned liikmesriigid kustutasid summasid OLAFi soovituste alusel enne komisjoni otsust.
(1) This definition is derived from the judgment in European Court of Justice Case No C-34/89. 
(1) See mratlus tuleneb kohtuasja C-34/89 Euroopa Kohtu otsusest.
(2) Commission Decision 2003/481/EC of 27 June 2003 (OJ L 160, 28.6.2003, p. 83). 
(2) Komisjoni 27. juuni 2003. aasta otsus 2003/481/E (ELT L 160, 28.6.2003, lk 83).
(3) This was the last of the annual decisions dealing with cases recommended for writing off by Member States. 53. 
(3) See oli viimane selle aasta otsustest, mis ksitles liikmesriikide poolt kustutamiseks soovitatud juhtumeid.
Current arrangements split nominal and effective responsibility for this procedure in a way which reduces accountability. 
53. kohustused selle menetluse osas viisil, mis vhendab aruandekohustust.
Recommending writing off is not a function that fits well the role of a fraud investigation and coordination body. 
Kustutamise soovitamine ei ole tegevus, mis sobiks kuigi hsti pettuste uurimis-ja koordineerimisorgani rolliga.
The Commission makes little use of its experience of irregularities 54. Notifications to OLAF for input to the ECR were intended, amongst other things, to intensify the campaign against fraud and irregularities. 
Komisjoni andmebaasi sisestamiseks meldud ja OLAFile saadetud teadete eesmrk oli muu hulgas tugevdada pettuste ja eeskirjade eiramise vastast kampaaniat.
In this context, the Council (4) requested the Commission to develop an investigation policy based upon strategic and operational analysis of information on fraud, irregularities and recoveries reported by Member States. 
Sellega seoses soovis nukogu, (4) et komisjon ttaks vlja uurimispoliitika, mis phineks pettuste, eeskirjade eiramise juhtumite ja tagasisaadud summade kohta liikmesriikidelt saadud andmete strateegilisel ja tulemusanalsil.
Parliament (5) has criticised the fact that the debt arising from irregularities and fraud has built up to an unacceptable level and that the recovery procedures do not work. 
Parlament (5) on kritiseerinud asjaolu, et eeskirjade eiramise ja pettuse tttu kogunenud vlad on judnud vastuvetamatule tasemele ja et sissenudmine ei toimi.
It called upon the Commission to submit a detailed analysis of the causes of this problem and proposals to remedy it. 
Parlament kutsus komisjoni les esitama ksikasjalikku analsi selle probleemi phjuste kohta ja ettepanekuid selle probleemi krvaldamiseks.
The Commission (6) submitted a communication on improving the recovery of Community entitlements in December 2002. 
Komisjon (6) esitas teatise henduse summade sissenudmise parandamise kohta detsembris 2002.
Parliament expressed doubts that the recovery procedures could be improved without clarification of the division of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture. 
Parlament kahtles, kas sissenudmist saab tiustada, selgitamata OLAFi ja pllumajanduse peadirektoraadi vahelist kohustuste jaotust.
The Commission has drawn attention to the poor quality of information provided by Member States in its Annual Report on the fight against fraud 2002. 
Oma pettusevastase vitluse 2002. aasta aruandes juhtis komisjon thelepanu liikmesriikide edastatud teabe halvale kvaliteedile.
It quotes the example that in 47 % of cases reported, the products involved were not identified, which does not facilitate risk analysis and which makes it harder to draw appropriate lessons. 
Ta toob nite, et teatatud juhtudest 47 % osas ei olnud asjassepuutuvaid tooteid tpsustatud, mis raskendab riskianalsi ning asjakohaste jrelduste tegemist.
It is attempting to improve the quality and timeliness of notifications by the introduction of direct input to the ECR by Member States, coupled with a programme of training courses and the provision of an ECR user manual. 
Komisjon pab teadete kvaliteeti ja igeaegsust parandada, juurutades andmete sisestamist komisjoni andmebaasi otse liikmesriikide poolt, millega kaasneb koolituskursuste programm ning komisjoni andmebaasi kasutusjuhend.
(4) Council conclusions on protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud 13244/1/02 REV 1 of 6 November 2002. 
(4) Nukogu 6. novembri 2002. aasta jreldused henduse finantshuvide kaitse ja pettusevastase vitluse kohta 13244/1/02 REV 1.
(5) Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control on the Annual Report on the fight against fraud 2001, PE 315.805 of 3 March 2003. 
(5) Eelarvekontrollikomisjoni aruanne pettusevastase vitluse kohta 2001. aasta PE 315.805, 3. mrts 2003.
(6) COM(2002) 671 final of 3 December 2002. 
(6) KOM (2002) 671 (lplik), 3.12.2002.
In the framework of the clearance of accounts for 1993, the Commission proposed to charge Germany 8,2 million euro for 21 cases where it considered Germany to have been negligent in its recovery action. 
1993. aasta raamatupidamisarvestuse kontrolli ja heakskiitmise raames tegi komisjon ettepaneku kanda Saksamaa kuludesse 8,2 miljonit eurot 21 juhtumi osas, kus Saksamaa oli komisjoni arvates olnud sissenudmisel hooletu.
The financial correction was however not implemented because of inadequate bilateral consultation. 
Ebapiisavate kahepoolsete konsultatsioonide tttu seda finantskorrektsiooni siiski ei rakendatud.
All but two of the cases were reconsidered for the 1995 decision and were charged to the EAGGF. 
Kik nimetatud juhtumid, vlja arvatud kaks, vaadati 1995. aasta otsuses le ja kanti EAGGFi kuludesse.
The Commission has not documented the reasons for reversing its original proposal. 
Komisjon ei ole dokumenteerinud oma esialgse ettepaneku muutmise phjuseid.
C 269/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 57. 
C 269/12 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 4.11.2004 57.
However there are other weaknesses to be addressed in the design of ECR information. 
Siiski on veel teisi puudusi, mis tuleb komisjoni andmebaasi teabe koostamisel krvaldada.
There are too many descriptions for the type of fraud and irregularities, 79 in all, some of which are ambiguous (see Table 4); the budget headings have not been entered in a consistent format and there are 46 codes for method of detection, some of which are again ambiguous (see Table 5). 
Pettuste ja eeskirjade eiramiste kirjeldusi on liiga palju, kokku 79, millest mned ei ole selged (vt tabel 4); eelarveread ei ole sisestatud htses formaadis ja avastamismeetodite koode on 46, millest mned on jllegi ebaselged (vt tabel 5).
Table 4 Types of irregularity Value of irregularities reported (million euro) 984 379 270 208 201 169 148 120 97 91 91 91 71 Percentage of total reported value Cumulative percentage 23 23 9 32 6 38 5 43 5 48 4 52 3 55 3 58 2 60 2 62 2 64 2 66 2 68 Source: OLAF ECR database of irregularities reported under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91. 
Eeskirjade eiramise liik Tabel 4 Eeskirjade eiramise liigid Teatatud eeskirjade Osakaal teatatud eiramiste koguvrtuses vrtus (%) Kumulatiivne osakaal (%) 23 32 38 43 48 52 55 58 60 62 64 66 68 Kumulatiivne osakaal (%) 27 49 55 60 64 68 71 74 76 78 80 82 (miljonit eurot) Fiktiivne kasutamine vi ttlemine 984 Valed vi vltsitud ridokumendid 379 Ebatpne kogus 270 Vale vi vltsitud abitaotlus 208 Fiktiivne liikumine 201 Krvalekalle kvaliteedis vi sisus 169 Muud eeskirju eiravate dokumentide juhud 148 Muud eeskirjade eiramised 120 Ringlusest eemaldatud vi varuks soetatud too-97 dete ebaseaduslik edasimk Vltsitud tollidokumendid 91 Sihtkoha muutmine 91 Lplikku sihtkohta mitte saabumine 74 Muude nuete eiramine 71 31. detsembri 2002. aasta seisuga. Allikas: OLAFi komisjoni andmebaas mruse 595/91 alusel teatatud eeskirjade eiramiste kohta.
Table 5 Detection methods Value of irregularities reported (million euro) Detection method Percentage of total reported Cumulative percentage Documentary checks Judicial enquiry National fiscal control Routine control Accounting control EU initiative 1 137 950 253 237 180 153 126 123 92 90 85 27 27 22 49 6 55 6 60 4 64 4 68 3 71 3 74 2 76 2 78 2 80 2 82 Judicial enquiry Interservice collaboration Laboratory analysis of samples National customs control Control on the premises of the beneficiary Other 81 Situation as at 31 December 2002. 
Tabel 5 Avastamismeetodid Teatatud eeskirjade eiramiste vrtus (miljonit eurot) 23 9 6 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Avastamismeetod Dokumendikontroll Kohtulik uurimine Riiklik maksukontroll Korraline kontroll Raamatupidamiskontroll ELi algatus Osakaal teatatud koguvrtuses (%) Kohtulik uurimine Talitustevaheline koost Nidiste laboratoorne anals Riiklik tollikontroll Abisaaja tegevusruumide kontroll Muu 81 31. detsembri 2002. aasta seisuga.
Source: OLAF ECR database of irregularities reported under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91. 
Allikas: OLAFi komisjoni andmebaas mruse 595/91alusel teatatud eeskirjade eiramiste kohta.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/13 58. 
4.11.2004 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 269/13 58.
The Court also found that there were significant errors in the data recorded in the ECR and even the absence of financial data of any kind for 91 cases (see paragraph 25). 
Kontrollikoda leidis ka, et komisjoni andmebaasis salvestatud andmetes oli olulisi vigu ja et 91 juhtumi kohta puudusid igasugused finantsandmed (vt punkt 25).
The ECR records the identities of persons consulting the database and the number of times it has been consulted. 
Komisjoni andmebaasis on salvestatud andmebaasiga tutvunud isikute andmed ja pringute arv.
From October 2001 to September 2002 there were 11 direct consultations by Commission Directorates-General. 
Oktoobrist 2001 septembrini 2002 tegid komisjoni peadirektoraadid andmebaasi 11 otsest pringut.
OLAF, however, has not carried out an evaluation of the use of the ECR data to determine whether or not it has provided useful information and has thus contributed to the fight against fraud. 
OLAF ei ole aga komisjoni andmebaasi kasutamist hinnanud, et otsustada, kas andmebaas andis kasulikku teavet vi mitte ja kas see aitas seega kaasa pettusevastasele vitlusele.
The Commission is required to study the information of which it has been notified and to inform Member StatesŐ representatives (meeting in the EAGGF Committee (1)) of any conclusions it intends to draw from them (2). 
Komisjon peab analsima talle esitatud teavet ja teatama liikmesriikide esindajatele (kes kohtuvad EAGGFi komitees (1)) kikidest jreldustest, mida ta kavatseb selle teabe phjal teha.
Although some information has been provided to the ÔIrregularities GroupŐ (3), neither OLAF nor its predecessor UCLAF has made such a report to the EAGGF Committee (4). 
(2) Kuigi osa teabest esitati nn eeskirjade rikkumise trh-male, (3) ei teatanud ei OLAF ega tema eelkija UCLAF sellest EAGGFi komiteele.
The blacklist 61. 
(4) Must nimekiri 61.
Member States are required to notify the Commission of the identity of operators who have committed irregularities exceeding 100 000 euro over a period of one year, together with details of the measures taken against those operators. 
Liikmesriigid peavad komisjonile teatama ettevtjatest, kes on aasta jooksul toime pannud eeskirjade eiramisi le-100 000 euro vrtuses, ning tpsustama nende ettevtjate suhtes vetud meetmed.
Member States have in general considered it impossible effectively to exclude entities found to have been involved in irregular or fraudulent operations from claiming further payments (e.g. the business can be transferred to another legal entity with the same shareholders etc). 
Liikmesriigid on ldjuhul leidnud, et on vimatu takistada eeskirjade vastaste vi pettusega seotud rihingutel esitada taotlusi edasiste maksete tegemiseks (nt saab ritegevuse kanda samade osanikega teisele juriidilisele isikule le jne).
Only six Member States have ever notified a company or individual under these arrangements (see also Special Report No 8/98, paragraphs 4.12 to 4.14 (5)). 
Selle korra alusel on rihingutest vi ksikisikust teatanud ldse ksnes kuus liikmesriiki (vt ka eriaruanne nr 8/98, punktid 4.12Đ4.14).
Comments received from Member States visited indicated that the greatest hindrance to the regulation was the fact that placing a company or individual on the blacklist may leave them open to legal redress and possible damages. 
(5) Klastatud liikmesriikide esitatud mrkus-tes ilmnes suurima takistusena see, et ettevtjate vi ksikisikute kandmine musta nimekirja vib phjustada regressi-vi vimalike kahjunuete tekkimist knealuste riikide vastu.
Until fraud is proven in a court of law (often a very lengthy process) it is uncertain whether a Member State can itself legally notify the names of companies and or individuals. 
Pettuse ten-damiseni kohtus (mis on sageli vga pikaajaline protsess) ei ole kindel, kas liikmesriigil on igus ettevtjate ja/vi ksikisikute nimed teatada.
(1) The EAGGF (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund) Committee and Irregularities Group are advisory bodies to the Commission. 
(1) EAGGFi (Euroopa Pllumajanduse Arendus-ja Tagatisrahastu) komitee ja eeskirjade eiramise trhm on komisjoni nuandeorganid.
They are chaired by a Commission official and consist of representatives from Member States. 
Nende eesotsas on komisjoni ametnik ja need koosnevad liikmesriikide esindajatest.
(2) Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991. 
(2) Nukogu 4. mrtsi 1991. aasta mruse (EM) nr 595/91 artikli 2 lige 3.
(3) Group ÔIrregularites and mutual assistance, agricultural productsŐ, Regulations (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991 (OJ L 67, 14.3.1991, p. 11) and (EC) No 515/97 of 13 March 1997 (OJ L 83, 25.3.1997, p. 1). 
(3) Trhm ŇEeskirjade eiramised ja vastastikune abi, pllumajandustootedÓ, 4. mrtsi 1991. aasta mrus (EM) nr 595/91 (ET L 67, 14.3.1991, lk 11) ja 13. mrtsi 1997. aasta mrus (E) nr 515/97 (ET L 83, 25.3.1997, lk 1).
(4) Irregularities and Mutual Assistance - Agricultural Products, Regulations (EEC) No 595/91 and (EC) No 515/97. 
(4) Eeskirjade eiramised ja vastastikune abi, pllumajandustooted Ń mrused 595/91 ja 515/97.
(5) OJ C 230, 22.7.1998, p. 16. 
(5) ET C 230, 22.7.1998, lk 16.
Recording of debts 63. 
Vlgade kirjendamine 63.
Since 1996 Member StatesŐ CAP paying agencies have been required to establish a list of debts (6) due to the Community under the CAP (debtorsŐ ledger). 
1996. aastast on liikmesriikide PP makseasutused kohustatud koostama PP raames hendusele vlguolevate summade nimekirja (6) (vlgnike arvestusraamat).
Since 2000, Member States have been required to inform the Commission (Directorate-General for Agriculture) twice yearly of the debt situation and progress of recoveries, as recorded in the debtorsŐ ledger, in an account known as Table 105 (7). 
2000. aastast on liikmesriigid kohustatud komisjonile (pllumajanduse peadirek-toraadile) kaks korda aastas nn tabelis 105 (7) teatama vlgade seisu ja sissenudmisel tehtud edusammud vastavalt vlgnike arvestusraamatu andmetele.
The amounts notified via Table 105 are included in the CommissionŐs consolidated balance sheet (8). 
Tabelis 105 teatatud summad kantakse komisjoni konsolideeritud bilanssi.
64. 
(8) 64.
So far as Table 105 material is concerned, the Directorate-General for Agriculture concluded in 1999, on the basis of audits carried out in Member States, that there were some doubts over the completeness and accuracy of some paying agenciesŐ debtorsŐ ledgers and that there was no guarantee that Member States were consistent in their approach to recording debt. 
Tabeli 105 materjali osas otsustas pllumajanduse peadirektoraat 1999. aastal liikmesriikides lbiviidud auditite alusel, et mnede makseasutuste vlgnike arvestusraamatute tielikkus ja igsus oli mnevrra kaheldav ja et ei olnud mingeid garantiisid selle kohta, et liikmesriigid oleksid vlgade kirjendamisel jr-jepidevad.
The ensuing report recommended that Commission services, paying agenciesŐ internal audit services and certifying bodies should make further efforts to improve the management of debts. 
Jrgnevas aruandes soovitati, et komisjoni talitused, makseasutuste siseauditi talitused ja akrediteerimisasutused peaksid veelgi pdma parandada vlgade juhtimist.
Since 2001 certifying bodies have had to certify the accuracy of Table 105. 
2001. aastast on akrediteerimisasutused kohustatud tendama tabeli 105 andmete igsust.
Certifying bodies do not use information held by the various control and fraud investigation bodies to check the completeness of debtorsŐ ledgers. Using information held on debtors at paying agencies, three certifying bodies qualified their certificates and nine certifying bodies noted serious weaknesses in the procedures for recording and recovering debts (see Annex B). 
Makseasutustes vlgnike kohta silitatud andmeid kasutades andis kolm akrediteerimisasutust mrkustega sertifikaadi ja heksa akrediteerimisasutust theldas tsiseid puudusi vlgade kirjendamis-ja sisse-nudemenetlustes (vt lisa B).
The Court also noted that, in nine cases, the scope of the certifying bodiesŐ audits of debtors did not meet the CommissionŐs guidelines. 
Kontrollikoda mrkis ka, et heksal juhul ei vastanud akrediteerimisasutuste teostatud vlgnike auditite ulatus komisjoni suunistele.
All Member States have set up debtorsŐ ledgers and since 2000 have submitted Table 105 to the Commission containing the required information. 
Kik liikmesriigid koostasid vlgnike arvestusraamatuid ja esitasid alates 2000. aastast komisjonile nutud teavet sisaldavat tabelit 105.
The audit did not reveal any material errors in the recording of new debts. 
Auditi kigus ei leitud mingisuguseid olulisi vigu uute vlgade kirjendamisel.
The requirement to maintain a debtorsŐ ledger was introduced with effect from 1996. 
Vlgnike arvestusraamatu pidamise nue viidi tegelikult sisse 1996. aastal.
However, some Member States (Denmark, Germany, Greece and the United Kingdom) have still not registered all debts incurred before that year in the debtorsŐ ledgers. Member States have also written (6) Including irregularities and other amounts due, for example, irregularities less than 4 000 euro, official error, etc. 
Siiski ei ole mned liikmesriigid (Taani, Saksamaa, Kreeka ja hendkuningriik) veel kirjendanud vlgnike arvestusraamatus kiki enne seda (6) Sealhulgas eeskirjade eiramised ja teised vlgu olevad summad, nt alla 4 000 euro suurused eeskirjade eiramise juhtumid, ametnike vead jne.