natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
72. for the purpose of measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of rural development spending, the common Monitoring and Evaluation framework has been developed in 2006 and Member states were requested to set relevant targets and expected output indicators to each measure programmed under the Eafrd for the programming period 2007–13. 
72. Maaelu arengu kulutuste mõjususe ja tõhususe mõõtmiseks töötati 2006. aastal välja ühine järelevalve-ja hindamisraamistik ning liikmesriikidel paluti kehtestada iga Maaelu Arengu Euroopa Põllumajandusfondi raames programmitöö perioodiks 2007–2013 kavandatud meetme kohta asjakohased eesmärgid ja prognoositud väljundinäitajad.
74. the commission has addressed the question of reliability of indicators in several cases; in the context of examination of the annual reports, annual review meetings and at the meetings of monitoring committees. to compile result indicators such as ‘increase of gross value added (GVa)’, Ms have been invited17 to capture relevant information on GVa from the supported enterprises when the application is approved and 2 years after the investment completion in order to integrate as much as possible the long-term effect of the investments. in the preparation of the monitoring and evaluation system for the next programming period 2014–20, account is being taken of weaknesses observed during this period. therefore, indicators will rather be assessed as part of the rdp evaluation. it will also be done by developing more precise explanatory documents (fiches) for each indicator to avoid potential inconsistencies in data collection through misinterpretation. 
74. Komisjon on käsitlenud näitajate usaldusväärsuse küsimust mitmel korral: aastaaruannete kontrollimise kontekstis, iga-aastastel läbivaatamiskoosolekutel ja seirekomitee koosolekutel.
17 WorkingdocumentprovidingguidancetoMsfortheresultindicator ‘increase of GVa’: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload. cfm?id=84053593-c697-ff89-Ed5c-51797d9754fd. 
17 Töödokument, milles antakse liikmesriikidele suuniseid seoses tulemusnäitajaga „kogulisandväärtuse suurenemine”: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id =84053593-C697-FF89-ED5C-51797D9754FD.
69. see reply to paragraph 67. the commission has been informed that action has since been taken to reduce the processing time in the Ms mentioned by the court. sweden: the implementation of axis 3 measures was regularly discussed in the monitoring committees’ meetings and the annual review meetings. in the autumn of 2012 the managing authority has fixed maximum delays for the handling of the applications (4 months) and also for the processing of the payments (90 days). box 15 — italy (campania) as underlined by the regional authorities, the procedure for granting the advance payment to the beneficiaries and for releasing the insurance policy guaranteeing the amount requested by the beneficiaries as an advanced payment has been revised by the paying agency (aGEa). 
69. Vt vastus punktile 67. Komisjonile on teatatud, et kontrollikoja nimetatud liikmesriigis on võetud meetmeid töötlemisaja lühendamiseks. rootsi: 3. telje meetmete rakendamist on korrapäraselt arutatud seirekomisjoni koosolekutel ja iga-aastastel läbivaatamiskoosolekutel.
77. see reply to paragraph 74. in respect of the principles of subsidiarity and shared management, the cMEf handbook describes globally the monitoring and evaluation tasks but also offers some flexibility to Ms on how they implement their monitoring and evaluation. 
Vt vastus punktile 74. 77. Subsidiaarsuse ja liikmesriikidega koostöös toimuva eelarve täitmise põhimõtteid järgides on ühise järelevalve-ja hindamisraamistiku käsiraamatus üldiselt kirjeldatud järelevalve- ja hindamisülesandeid, kuid pakutud liikmesriikidele järelevalve ja hindamise rakendamisel ka teatavat paindlikkust.
Ms should identify the right balance to ensure good quality data at an acceptable cost in terms of monitoring procedures. box 17 see reply to paragraph 74. 
Liikmesriigid peaksid kindlaks tegema, milline on järelevalvemenetluse puhul õige tasakaal, et tagada kvaliteetsed andmed vastuvõetavate kuludega. 17. selgitus Vt vastus punktile 74. 79.
79. see reply to paragraph 74 and 83. 
Vt vastus punktidele 74 ja 83.
80. italy (campania): the regional authorities consider that the audited projects are pertinent with the objectives of the measures and contribute to reach the overall objectives set down for axis 3 in terms of diversification of rural activities into non-agricultural activities. this is also the case for projects number 2 and 3 cited by the court. in the case of project number 3 the regional authorities maintained the position that the refurbishment of the external court yard is linked to the diversification projects ‘fatto-ria didattica’ because it is essential for ensuring a proper access to the farm. the commission will analyse this case. 
80. itaalia (Campania). Piirkondlikud ametiasutused leiavad, et auditeeritud projektid on meetme eesmärkide seisukohast asjakohased ning aitavad saavutada 3. telje puhul kehtestatud üldeesmärki seoses maapiirkondades tegevuse mitmekesistamisega mittepõllumajandusliku tegevuse suunas.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 82. Estimation of GVa increases is a complex issue, because beneficiaries may need time to stabilise their new or expanded economic activity. short delays between project realisation and time for assessment may result in underestimation of the GVa increase. furthermore, attention should be paid to the type of investment as some investments may not lead to immediate or a direct GVa increase (e.g. signposting, information centres, marketing studies, etc.). 
Kogulisandväärtuse suurenemise hindamine on keeruline küsimus, sest toetusesaajad võivad vajada aega oma uue või laiendatud majandustegevuse stabiliseerimiseks. Projektide elluviimise ja hindamise aja vahelise lühikese ajavahemiku tõttu võidakse kogulisandväärtuse suurenemist alahinnata. Peale selle tuleks pöörata tähelepanu investeeringu liigile, sest teatavad investeeringud ei pruugi tuua kaasa kogulisandväärtuse kohest või otsest suurenemist (nt vaatamisväärsuste tähistamine, infopunktid, turundus-uuringud jne).
83. the assessment of deadweight and displacement can be better established at evaluation stage. as regards deadweight, and in relation to the 20 projects marked by the court with a ‘strong’ label for indications of deadweight in annex ii, the Eu legislation provides that the general state aid rules for the support provided under article 52 of council regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005 and for Leader when delivering on axis 3. these rules stipulate that that expenditure is eligible from the submission of the aid application. this requirement is stated in the state aid rules to establish necessary incentive element.18 the same rules should apply to co-financed measures as for separate aid schemes notified under the general state aid regime. see also replies to paragraph 52, 53 and 55. as regards displacement see replies to paragraph 58, 59, 61, 62 and Box 12. 
83. Tühimõju ja ümberpaiknemist saab paremini hinnata hindamisetapis. Seoses tühimõjuga ning 20 projektiga, mille puhul kontrollikoda tegi II lisas tühimõju näitajate kohta märke „suur”, on ELi õigusaktides sätestatud, et määruse (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 artikli 52 alusel antava toetuse suhtes ning Leaderi suhtes, kui sellega rakendatakse 3. telge, kohaldatakse üldisi riigiabi eeskirju.
Economic situation changes over time, especially with the entry of the economic and financial crisis in 2008–09. it is therefore possible that ex ante-made assumptions do not fully realise within the course of the projects’ implementation. 
Majandusolukord muutub aja jooksul, eelkõige tingituna 2008.–2009. aastal alanud majandus-ja finantskriisist. Seepärast on võimalik, et eelnevad eeldused ei realiseeru täielikult projekti rakendamise käigus.
Moreover, for projects aiming at medium to long-term sustainability, these indicators could be reached at a later stage (than immediately after the investment is finalised). 
Peale selle võidakse keskpikale kuni pikaajalisele jätkusuulikkusele suunatud projektide puhul saavutada need näitajad hilisemas etapis (mitte vahetult pärast investeeringute lõpuleviimist).
18 article 8 of commission regulation (Ec) no 800/2008. its paragraph 2 states: aid granted to sMEs, covered by this regulation, shall be considered to have an incentive effect if, before work on the project or activity has started, the beneficiary has submitted an application for the aid to the Member state concerned.. 
18 Komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 800/2008 artikkel 8.
70 84. the commission considers that safeguarding of existing jobs through support to existing businesses is one of the major value-added aspects of the Eafrd alongside the temporary job creation linked to the implementation of investment projects in certain fields (e.g. construction activities). the 5-year durability period also ensures that a certain safeguarding element exists for every supported project. 
70 84. Komisjon leiab, et olemasolevate töökohtade kaitsmine tegutsevatele ettevõtjatele toetuse andmise kaudu on üks Maaelu Arengu Euroopa Põllumajandusfondi suurim lisaväärtus lisaks ajutiste töökohtade loomisele, mis on seotud investeerimisprojektide rakendamisega teatavates valdkondades (nt ehitustegevus).
However, lessons have been learned which will be applied for the next programming period 2014–20 especially through guidance within the programming process. 
Saadud on aga kogemusi, mida kasutatakse järgmisel programmitöö perioodil (2014–2020), eelkõige suuniste andmise teel programmitöö raames.
19 council regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005 and commission regulation (Ec) no 1974/2006 (article 18 of council regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005. 
19 Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 ja komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1974/2006 (nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 artikkel 18).
71 the commission has proposed for the next programming period 2014–20 that the three measures audited by the court be merged into one single measure with a better beneficiary focus, improved eligibility conditions and better rules for payments reducing the administrative burden that could be associated with these measures. the commission is foreseeing further reduction of the administrative burden in the form of introducing simplified costs. as a result, the process of claiming, administering and auditing reimbursements for payments made will be easier for both the beneficiaries and the administration itself. 
Komisjoni vastused Järgmiseks programmitöö perioodiks (2014–2020) on komisjon teinud ka ettepaneku koondada need kolm meedet üheks meetmeks, pöörata rohkem tähelepanu toetusesaajatele, täiustada toetuskõlblikkuse tingimusi ja tõhustada makseid käsitlevaid eeskirju, mis vähendavad kõnealuste meetmetega seotud halduskoormust. Kaasseadusandjad määratlevad kavandatud uue meetme lõpliku ulatuse. 87.
90. as regards objectives in the current period, Member states must identify the rationale for intervention, the objectives, the scope and actions. furthermore, there has to be evidence that for investment measures support is targeted on clearly defined objectives reflecting identified territorial needs and structural disadvantages (article 43 and annex ii of regulation (Ec) no 1974). 
90. Seoses praeguse perioodi eesmärkidega peavad liikmesriigid kindlaks määrama sekkumise põhjendused, eesmärgid, ulatuse ja tegevused. Peale selle peab olema tõendeid selle kohta, et investeerimismeetmete toetus on suunatud selgelt määratletud eesmärkidele, mis väljendavad kindlaksmääratud struktuuri-ja territoriaalseid vajadusi ning struktuurilist halvemust (määruse (EÜ) nr 1974/2006 artikkel 43 ja II lisa).
When approving the rdps, the commission carries out an analysis to assess that programmes and measures are consistent with the community strategic guidelines21, the relevant national strategy plans and that they comply with the relevant legal provisions22. the commission, being aware of some weaknesses in the measurability, has proposed, for the next programming period, that appropriate targets should be set for each of the focus areas of the union priorities, on the basis of common indicators, and that the selected measures in relation to the union priorities should be based on sound intervention logic supported by an ex ante evaluation. 
Maaelu arengukavade heakskiitmisel koostab komisjon analüüsi, et hinnata, kas programmid ja meetmed on kooskõlas ühenduse strateegiasuuniste,21 asjakohaste riiklike strateegiakavade ja vastavate õigusnormidega22. Komisjon on teadlik teatavatest puudustest seoses mõõ-detavusega ning on soovitanud kehtestada järgmiseks programmitöö perioodiks kõikides liidu prioriteetidega seotud põhivaldkondades ühiste näitajate põhjal sobilikud eesmärgid ning tagada, et liidu prioriteetidega seotud valitud meetmed põhinevad usaldusväärsel sekkumisloogikal, mida toetab eelhindamine.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN While noting that the measures subject to audit have wider objectives than just redressing market failures related to barriers to employment and growth, the commission agrees that the rdps should present measurable objectives contributing to the policy aims. the commission, being aware of some weaknesses in this field, has proposed, for the Eafrd for the next programming period 2014–20, to strengthen the legal framework so that ex ante quantified targets are set for each of the focus areas of the union priorities. the content of the programme shall contain a description of the strategy, and that the selected measures in relation to the union priorities are based on sound intervention logic supported by an ex ante evaluation. 
23 Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 ja komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1974/2006 (nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 artikkel 18). Komisjoni vastused Kuigi komisjon märgib, et auditeeritud meetmete eesmärgid on laiemad kui tööhõive ja majanduskasvu tõketega seotud turutõrgete kõrvaldamine, nõustub ta, et maaelu arengukavades tuleks esitada mõõdetavad eesmärgid, mis aitavad saavutada poliitilisi eesmärke.
Where a proposed programme does not contain such a strategy and adequate targets, the commission will not approve it. 
Kui kavandatud programm sellist strateegiat ja piisavaid eesmärke ei sisalda, ei kiida komisjon seda heaks.
However, the commission will provide additional guidance in this matter. 
Komisjon esitab aga selles küsimuses täiendavaid suuniseid.
92. the commission considers there was an improvement in the implementation of the programmes alongside the progress of programming period. the commission, being aware of certain problems in this area, has introduced in its proposal for the new Eu rural development policy for the next programming period 2014–20 a specific compulsory requirement in relation to the setting up and use of selection criteria (with the exception of some areas of animal-related measures for which such compulsory use may not be appropriate). recommendation 1 the principles of subsidiarity and shared management hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions. 
92. Komisjon leiab, et programmitöö perioodi edenedes paranes ka projektide rakendamine. Komisjon on teadlik teatavatest probleemidest selles valdkonnas ning on oma ettepanekus ELi maaelu arengu poliitika kohta järgmisel programmitöö perioodil (2014–2020) kehtestanud konkreetse kohustusliku nõude valikukriteeriumide koostamise ja kasutamise kohta (välja arvatud mõni loomadega seotud meede, mille puhul selline kohustuslik kasutamine ei pruugi olla sobilik).
Special report No 6/2013 – Have the Member States and the Commission achieved value for money with the measures for diversifying the rural economy? 72 recommendation 2 the broad scope of the audited measures should be recognised, as they not only bring impact on employment and income but also contribute to the sustainability of rural areas. the commission has insisted on several occasions during the current programming period on the need for greater selectivity and is prepared to further encourage Member states to apply such an approach. the application of selection criteria or equivalent targeting mechanism is examined by the commission in its audit missions and several observations in this regard have been made to the Member states. if needed, the commission proposes financial corrections. the commission agrees with the recommendation and has, in the proposal on the Eu rural development policy for programming period 2014–20 foreseen that the selection criteria shall be defined for all measures and shall aim to ensure equal treatment of applicants, better use of financial resources and targeting of measures in accordance with the union priorities for rural development. the use of selection criteria is proposed to be generally compulsory even in the case where available funds are sufficient, except in the case of some compensatory area and animal-related measures.24 the commission also agrees that the project selection system of the Member states should take into account the quality of the projects and use a minimum scoring system. the commission will present guidelines to the Member states on the use of eligibility and selection criteria for the next programming period. 
Eriaruanne nr 6/2013 – Kas liikmesriigid ja komisjon saavutasid maamajanduse mitmekesistamise meetmetega kulutustele vastavat tulu? 72 2. soovitus Tunnistada tuleks auditeeritud meetmete laiaulatuslikkust, sest need ei mõjuta mitte üksnes tööhõivet ja sissetulekuid, vaid aitavad kaasa ka maapiirkondade jätkusuutlikkusele.
24 thelegalbasisistheproposalfortheruraldevelopmentregulation and its article 49, as well as the related implementing/delegated acts. see coM(2011) 627 final/2 dated 19.10.2011. 
24 Õiguslikalusonmaaeluarengumäärusjaselleartikkel49,samutiseotud rakendusaktid / delegeeritud aktid. Vt KOM(2011) 627 (lõplik/2), 19.10.2011.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN therefore, the commission does not consider the question to the beneficiary of whether he needs the grant as an appropriate tool to assess deadweight. the assessment of deadweight is more complex and should be part of the evaluation of programmes. the commission considers that if the investment support is well targeted (using among others eligibility and selection criteria, differentiation in aid rates) and based on clearly identified gaps/needs, the risk of deadweight and displacement is minimised. the targeting of investment support (article 43 of regulation 1974/2006) was introduced in this programming period exactly to limit deadweight and displacement effects coming out of earlier evaluations. as regards the displacement, the commission does not consider that in case a subsidy leads to increase of the marketing share at the expense of a competitor a priori is economically inefficient. the support e.g. may have led to more efficient (economically and/or environmentally) businesses which may contribute to the overall development of the rural economy. the commission has included in the legal proposal for the next programming period requirement that specific needs linked with specific conditions at regional or sub-regional level are taken into account and concretely addressed through adequately designed combinations of measures or thematic subprogrammes. the commission has also proposed that appropriate targets are set for each of the focus areas of the union priorities, on the basis of common result indicators, and that the selected measures in relation to the union priorities are based on sound intervention logic supported by an ex ante evaluation. 
Komisjoni vastused Seepärast ei leia komisjon, et tühimõju hindamiseks on piisav, kui küsida toetusesaajalt, kas ta vajab toetust. Tühimõju hindamine on keerulisem ja see peaks moodustama osa programmide hindamisest. Komisjon leiab, et kui investeerimistoetus on hästi suunatud (kasutades muu hulgas toetuskõlblikkus-ja valikukriteeriume, abi osatähtsuste eristamist) ning põhineb selgelt kindlaksmääratud lünkadel/vajadustel, on tühimõju ja tegevuse ümberpaiknemise oht minimaalne.
94. the risk of overspending is to be considered. the aid-inten-sity rates should contribute to reduce such risks. recommendation 4 the commission notes that this recommendation is for the Member states and that the principles of subsidiarity and shared management hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions. the commission covers the issue of evaluation of the reasonableness of costs during its audit missions on investment measures. it verifies that the Member state has established an effective system to evaluate the reasonableness of costs. 
Selliseid riske peaksid aitama vähendada abi osatähtsuse määrad. 4. soovitus Komisjon märgib, et see soovitus on suunatud liikmesriikidele ning et subsidiaarsuse ja liikmesriikidega koostöös toimuva eelarve täitmise põhimõtted annavad liikmesriikidele ja piirkondadele märkimisväärse kaalutlusõiguse.
25 article8ofcommissionregulation(Ec)no800/2008.itsparagraph2 states: aid granted to sMEs, covered by this regulation, shall be considered to have an incentive effect if, before work on the project or activity has started, the beneficiary has submitted an application for the aid to the Member state concerned. 
25 Komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 800/2008 artikkel 8. Selle lõikes 2 on sätestatud: „Käesoleva määruse alusel VKEdele antaval abil loetakse olevat ergutav mõju, kui abisaaja on enne projekti või tegevuse teostamiseks töö alustamist esitanud asjaomasele liikmesriigile abi saamiseks taotluse”.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 95. in the preparation of the monitoring and evaluation system for the future period, account is being taken of weaknesses observed during this period. in practice, it has been difficult for Mas to compile the necessary data and conduct the analysis required to establish values for these types of result indicators (GVa ...) as part of their regular annual monitoring activities. therefore, for the next programming period, result indicators will rather be assessed as part of the rdp evaluation. it will also be done by developing more precise explanatory document (fiches) for each indicator to avoid potential inconsistencies in data collection through misinterpretation. the collection of information and the monitoring of projects’ implementation lies within the responsibilities of the Member states and the commission cannot be requested to actively manage this process as it goes against the subsidiarity and shared management principle. recommendation 5 objectives and their targets at programme level are set up by the managing authority as part of the programme strategy. at the project level estimated/predicted results/outcomes by which the project in question will contribute to the programme objectives are set ex ante by potential beneficiaries in their applications. 
Komisjoni vastused 95. Tulevase perioodi järelevalve-ja hindamissüsteemi koostamisel võetakse arvesse praegusel perioodil täheldatud puudusi. Tegelikult on korraldusasutustel olnud keeruline koguda oma korrapärase iga-aastase järelevalvetegevuse käigus vajalikke andmeid ja teostada nõutavaid analüüse seda liiki näitajate (kogulisandväärtus ...) väärtuste kindlakstegemiseks.
However, there are always uncertainties and external factors in the achievement of the targets set, so the targets should also be able to be adjusted accordingly, if need to be. the commission agrees with the recommendation and is taking care that in the preparation of the common Monitoring and Evaluation framework for the future period, which is currently being elaborated26, weaknesses observed during this period are taken into account. therefore, for the next programming period, result indicators will rather be assessed as part of the rdp evaluation. it will also be done by developing more precise explanatory documents (fiches) for each indicator to avoid potential inconsistencies in data collection through misinterpretation. 
Kehtestatud sihtide saavutamisel on aga alati tegemist ebakindluse ja väliste teguritega, mistõttu selliseid sihte peaks olema võimalik vajaduse korral vastavalt kohandada. Komisjon nõustub soovitusega ja hoolitseb selle eest, et praegu sõnastatava tulevase perioodi ühise järelevalve-ja hindamisraamistiku26 koostamisel võetakse arvesse praegusel perioodil täheldatud puudusi.