natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
22. the legislation allows for a wide interpretation of the eligibility of activities and sectors under axis 3. targeting can be achieved not only via limitation on the eligibility of activities or economic sectors, but also through regional and sectorial differentiation, selection criteria, differentiation of aid intensities as well as aid ceilings by which Member states can make a pre-selection among potential beneficiaries. 
22. Õigusaktid võimaldavad 3. telje tegevusvaldkondade ja sektorite toetuskõlblikkust laialt tõlgendada. Suunamist on võimalik saavutada mitte üksnes tegevusvaldkondade või majandussektorite toetuskõlblikkuse piiramise teel, vaid ka piirkondade ja sektorite eristamise, valikukriteeriumide, abi osatähtsuse eristamise, aga ka abi ülemmäärade kehtestamise kaudu, mille põhjal on liikmesriikidel võimalik teha toetusesaajate seas eelvalik.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 24. see replies to paragraphs 18, 20 and 22. as regards the efficiency and effectiveness of the measures proposed by Member states contributing to growth and jobs, the commission considers that it cannot be fully established ex ante (e.g. the impacts of the ongoing financial and economic crisis on rural businesses). 
Komisjoni vastused 24. Vt vastused punktidele 18, 20 ja 22. Seoses liikmesriikide kavandatud majanduskasvu ja töökohtade loomist soodustavate meetmete mõjususe ja tõhususega leiab komisjon, et seda ei ole võimalik eelnevalt täiel määral kindlaks teha (nt kestva finants-ja majanduskriisi mõju maaettevõtjatele).
Growth and jobs are not the only objectives of axis 3 of the Eu rural development policy, and are not the only territorial or structural needs that can be potentially identified by Member states in their rdps. 
Majanduskasv ja töökohad ei ole ELi maaelu arengu poliitika 3. telje ainsad eesmärgid ega kujuta endast ainsat territoriaalset või struktuurilist vajadust, mille liikmesriigid võivad oma maaelu arengukavades kindlaks määrata.
25. see reply to paragraph 22. 
25. Vt vastus punktile 22.
26. see reply to paragraph 16. the measures under axis 3 are delivered within the limitations of the general Eu state aid rules. the legislation has not imposed on Member states a legal requirement for setting of restrictive eligibility rules, unless the sWot analysis and assessment of needs require such actions at national or regional level. the commission will provide additional guidance on eligibility and selection criteria for the next programming period 2014–20. as regards the observations of the court that projects are ineligible, the following should be taken into consideration: czech republic: according to information provided by the national authorities, the project is currently under review. sweden: article 54 of regulation 1698/2005 only stipulates that support shall relate to micro-enterprises, and not that micro-enterprises should be the sole beneficiaries under the measure.10 10 thecommunitystrategicguidelinesforruraldevelopment2007–13 further define the strategic intentions behind the support provided under article 52(a)(ii) of council regulation no 1698/2005. 
Vt vastus punktile 16. 3. telje meetmeid rakendatakse üldiste ELi riigiabieeskirjade piires. Õigusaktidega ei ole liikmesriikide suhtes sätestatud õiguslikku nõuet kehtestada piiravaid toetuskõlblikkuse eeskirju, välja arvatud juhul, kui SWOT-analüüsi ja vajaduste hindamise põhjal on riigi või piirkonna tasandil selliseid meetmeid tarvis.
Key action (iv) from section 3.3: ‘developing micro-business and crafts, which can build on traditional skills or introduce new competences, particularly when combined with purchase of equipment, training and coaching, thus helping to promote entrepreneurship and develop economic fabric.’ Special report No 6/2013 – Have the Member States and the Commission achieved value for money with the measures for diversifying the rural economy? 
Vt põhimeede iv, punkt 3.3:„Mikroettevõtete ja käsitöönduse arendamine võib põhineda traditsioonilistel oskustel või luua uusi oskusi, eriti kombineerituna seadmete ostmise, koolituse ja juhendamisega, ettevõtluse edendamise aitamisega ning majandusstruktuuri arendamisega”. Eriaruanne nr 6/2013 – Kas liikmesriigid ja komisjon saavutasid maamajanduse mitmekesistamise meetmetega kulutustele vastavat tulu?
63 box 4 see reply to paragraph 26. poland implements measure 313 in an integrated way with village renewal and development (measure 322) and conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage (measure 323). the integrated measure aims also at the setting up of basic services, including cultural and leisure activities, concerning a village or group of villages, including related small-scale infrastructure as defined in article 56 of council regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005. 
Vt vastus punktile 26. Poola rakendab meedet 313 terviklikult koos külade uuendamise ja arendamisega (meede 322) ning maapiirkondade pärandi säilitamise ja selle kvaliteedi parandamisega (meede 323).
12 onlyincaseofcertainannualormultiannualmeasures,forexample agri-environment-climate measure, where the measures are implemented through standard operations which should provide equal environmental or animal welfare effects, will the use of the selection criteria be optional in case of sufficient funds. 
12 Piisavaterahalistevahenditeolemasolukorralonvalikukriteeriumide kasutamine vabatahtlik üksnes teatavate üheaastaste või mitmeaastaste meetmete, näiteks põllumajanduse keskkonna-ja kliimameetme puhul, kui meetmeid rakendatakse standardtoimingutega, mis peaksid tagama ühetaolise mõju keskkonnale või loomade heaolule. Komisjoni vastused 30.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 30. see the reply to paragraph 29. italy (campania): see reply in Box 5. box 5 — italy (campania) following the court’s audit the managing authority has recognised the weakness detected in the attribution of points to individual projects and it has acted immediately in order to remedy the mistakes in awarding the projects presented for support. the action undertaken consisted in issuing clear instruction to the staff responsible to scrutinise the projects proposed for support. in particular it was made clear to them that no points (0 points) should be attributed if the selection criteria are not met. box 5 — france (aquitaine) according to the regional authorities investments made in order to meet the criteria set out, amongst others, in the framework of the regional programme ‘destination Vigno-bles’ are eligible under measure 311. this is in line with the overall strategy of the region which aims at improving the standards of the touristic facilities in the vineyards by encouraging the managers to make the necessary investments in order to respect a quality charter. according to the rules under council regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005, the development of existing rural businesses could be supported if eligibility conditions are met. box 5 — italy (campania) the commission has reminded the italian authorities about the importance of the selection procedures in ensuring that the measures and programme objectives are achieved (see also reply to Box 5). 
5. selgitus. Vastavalt nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 kohastele eeskirjadele võib toetada olemasolevate maaettevõtjate arengut, kui toetuskõlblikkuse tingimused on täidetud.
64 box 6 — czech republic the commission has challenged this practice and addressed this issue with the managing authority during meetings and in writing at the beginning of 2010.13 box 6 — italy (campania) see replies in Box 5 and paragraph 31. box 6 — sweden according to the explanations of the swedish Board of agriculture the county board accepted applications on a running basis and only the projects that contributed to the objectives of the programme and the priorities set by the county were accepted. the quality of the projects and their capacity to satisfy these priorities was assessed on the basis of the business and project plans. this assessment shall in future be justified. 
64 6. selgitus. tšehhi vabariik Komisjon on sellise tava vaidlustanud ning arutanud seda küsimust korraldusasutusega koosolekutel ja kirja teel 2010. aasta alguses13. 6. selgitus. itaalia (Campania) Vt vastused 5. selgitusele ja punktile 31. 6. selgitus. rootsi Rootsi Põllumajandusnõukogu selgituste kohaselt võttis lääni nõukogu taotlusi vastu jooksvalt ning heaks kiideti üksnes sellised projektid, mis aitasid saavutada programmi eesmärke ja riigi kehtestatud prioriteete.
32. the audited measures contribute also to the sustainable development of rural areas and their economic environment, to safeguarding existing jobs, and to development of the conditions for economic growth. furthermore, ‘skill level’ should also be taken into account. it should be noted that costs per job differ between regions, Ms and economic sectors, and is not the only criterion for assessment of applications. cost per job may be an inappropriate indicator, for example, in the cases when investments cover highly technological activities that require little human resources for their management, when safeguarding jobs, when improving existing jobs’ quality, or when temporary employment linked to the investment is created. 
Peale selle tuleks arvesse võtta ka nn oskuste taset. Tuleb märkida, et töökohtade maksumus on piirkondade, liikmesriikide ja majandussektorite kaupa erinev ning see ei ole taotluste hindamisel ainuke kriteerium. Töökoha maksumus ei pruugi olla sobiv näitaja näiteks juhul, kui investeeringud hõlmavad äärmiselt tehnoloogilist tegevust, mille juhtimiseks on vaja vähe inimressursse, kui tegemist on töökohtade kaitsmisega, kui parandatakse olemasolevate töökohtade kvaliteeti või kui luuakse investeeringuga seotud ajutisi töökohti.
13 1. By letter of 19 March 2010 (ref. ares(2010)148269) the commission wrote to the cZ authorities indicating that it had been informed in the preparatory meeting held on 11/11/2009 before the Monitoring committee meeting of 12/11/2009 that in 2009 the selection criteria had not been applied. this issue was also discussed with the cZ authorities at the annual review meeting held in february 2010 and at the preparatory meeting held on 24/03/2010 before the Monitoring committee meeting of 25/03/2010. in its letter the commission made reference to article 43 of regulation 1974/2006 and article 71(2) of regulation 1698/2005. 
13 1) 19. märtsi 2010. aasta kirjas (viide Ares(2010)148269) juhtis komisjon Tšehhi Vabariigi ametiasutuste tähelepanu sellele, et enne 12. novembril 2009 toimunud seirekomisjoni koosolekut 11. novembril 2009 korraldatud ettevalmistaval koosolekul teavitati teda asjaolust, et 2009. aastal ei kohaldatud valikukriteeriume.
2. the cZ authorities replied by letter of 7/04/2010 ref. cj.10039/10-11200 (registered at the commission on 13/04/2010 with ref. ares(2010)189115). 
2) Tšehhi Vabariigi ametiasutused vastasid 7. aprilli 2010. aasta kirjaga (viide Cj.10039/10-11200) (registreeriti komisjonis 13. aprillil 2010, viide Ares(2010)189115).
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 34. the range of costs per job given by the court (3 000– 215 000 euro) does not relate to similar or same activities, thus recognition of the different types of investments should also be made. 
Komisjoni vastused 34. Kontrollikoja esitatud töökohtade maksumuse vahemik (3000–215 000 eurot) ei osuta sarnasele või samale tegevusele, seega tuleks arvesse võtta ka eri liiki investeeringuid.
37. the commission notes that the principles of subsidiarity and shared management hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions given that the cMEf does not specify what additional indicators are to be used by Member states when evaluating and monitoring projects. the selection of projects and their implementation monitoring lies within the responsibility of Member states. the commission makes the necessary effort in the course of its audit missions to detect inadequate practices and propose relevant measures related to it, including their correction. 
37. Komisjon märgib, et subsidiaarsuse ja liikmesriikidega koostöös toimuva eelarve täitmise põhimõtted annavad liikmesriikidele ja piirkondadele märkimisväärse kaalutlus-õiguse, sest ühises järelevalve-ja hindamisraamistikus ei ole täpsustatud, milliseid täiendavaid näitajaid peaksid liikmesriigid projektide hindamisel ja järelevalves kasutama.
However, the commission is encouraging Member states not to apply a 100 % aid intensity for private profit-generating projects within this rule. Special report No 6/2013 – Have the Member States and the Commission achieved value for money with the measures for diversifying the rural economy? 
Komisjon soovitab aga liikmesriikidel mitte kohaldada selle reegli raames 100% abi osatähtsust tulu teenivate erasektori projektide suhtes. Eriaruanne nr 6/2013 – Kas liikmesriigid ja komisjon saavutasid maamajanduse mitmekesistamise meetmetega kulutustele vastavat tulu?
65 box 8 — sweden the cMEf result indicators are set at national level. sweden has, however, 21 counties each of which face different challenges, needs and administrative problems. the final result indicators’ achievements will be collected on the basis of the finalised projects, which mean that these targets are often reached quite slowly, as the realisation of a project may take several years. 
65 8. selgitus. rootsi Ühise järelevalve-ja hindamisraamistiku tulemusnäitajad kehtestatakse riigi tasandil. Rootsis on aga 21 lääni, millest igaühe puhul on tegemist erinevate probleemide, vajaduste ja haldusküsimustega. Lõplikud andmed tulemusnäitajate saavutamise kohta kogutakse lõpuleviidud projektide põhjal, mis tähendab seda, et kõnealuste eesmärkide täitmine on sageli suhteliselt aeglane, sest projekti rakendamiseks võib kuluda mitu aastat.
By the end of 2012 axis 3 was committed at about 76 %, thus significant progress has been made between 2010 and 2012. 
2012. aasta lõpuks oli 3. teljest kulukohustustega kaetud ligikaudu 76%, seega tehti aastatel 2010–2012 suuri edusamme.
43. see reply to paragraph 42. czech republic: the commission, in the light of its competences and responsibility, has undertaken the necessary steps for ensuring that the targets set by the cZ are now more appropriate. in the annual review meetings14 in 2011 and 2012, the ‘commission pointed to the unbalance between the fulfilment of the targets for output indicators and the amounts committed and reiterated that adaptation of indicators can be done only if no other action is possible to ensure that the targets are achieved. the commission emphasised that priority should be given to projects which create jobs.’ the commission has accepted a reduction in the targets for gross number of jobs because it became clear that the initial targets were more ambitious than realistic, and that due to the economic and financial crisis such targets would not be achieved. 
Komisjon on oma pädevust ja vastutust arvestades võtnud sobivad meetmed, millega tagati, et Tšehhi Vabariigi seatud eesmärgid on nüüd sobilikumad. 2011. ja 2012. aasta läbivaatamiskoosolekutel14 „[---] osutas komisjon tasakaalu puudumisele väljundinäitajatega seotud eesmärkide täitmise ja kulukohustuste summade vahel ning kordas, et näitajaid võib kohandada üksnes juhul, kui eesmärkide saavutamise tagamiseks ei ole võimalik muid meetmeid võtta.
14 in relation to measure 311 (code in cZ rdp: iii.1.1 ‘diversification into non-agricultural activities’) and measure 313 (code in cZ rdp: iii.1.3 ‘Encouragement of tourism activities’). 
14 Seoses meetmega 311 (kood Tšehhi Vabariigi maaelu arengukavas: III.1.1 „Mitmekesistamine mittepõllumajandusliku tegevuse suunas”) ja meetmega 313 (kood Tšehhi Vabariigi maaelu arengukavas: III.1.3 „Turismi soodustamine”).
66 55. in the context of the axis 3 measures of the Eafrd, the legislation provided that the general state aid rules apply for support under article 52 of regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005 and for Leader when delivering on axis 3. these rules require that expenditure is eligible from the submission of the aid application. this requirement is stated in the state aid rules to establish the necessary incentive element.15 the same rules should apply to co-financed measures as for separate aid schemes notified under the state aid regime. furthermore, the support to projects should be granted on the basis of the assessment of whether the project contributes to the objectives of the rdp. taking account of the beneficiaries’ financial capacity in isolation to assess deadweight may entail the risk of supporting non-viable projects and increased administrative costs for the authorities and increased administrative burden for the beneficiaries. 
66 55. Seoses Maaelu Arengu Euroopa Põllumajandusfondi 3. telje meetmetega on õigusaktides sätestatud, et määruse (EÜ) nr 1698/2005 artikli 52 alusel antava toetuse suhtes ning Leaderi suhtes, kui sellega rakendatakse 3. telge, kohaldatakse üldisi riigiabi eeskirju.
57. see reply to paragraph 53 and 83. 
57. Vt vastus punktidele 53 ja 83.
58. the commission considers that if the investment support is well targeted (using among others eligibility and selection criteria, differentiation in aid rates) and based on clearly identified gaps/needs16, the risk of deadweight and displacement is minimised. the targeting of investment support (article 43) was introduced in this programming period exactly to limit deadweight and displacement effects coming out of earlier evaluations. the commission does not consider that in case a subsidy leads to increase of the marketing share at the expense of a competitor a priori is economically inefficient. the support e.g. may have led to more efficient (economically and/ or environmentally) businesses which may contribute to the overall development of the rural economy. 
58. Komisjon leiab, et kui investeerimistoetus on hästi suunatud (kasutades muu hulgas toetuskõlblikkus-ja valikukriteeriume, abi osatähtsuste eristamist) ning põhineb selgelt kindlaksmääratud lünkadel/vajadustel16, on tühimõju ja tegevuse ümberpaiknemise oht minimaalne.
15 article 8 of commission regulation (Ec) no 800/2008. its paragraph 2 states: aid granted to sMEs, covered by this regulation, shall be considered to have an incentive effect if, before work on the project or activity has started, the beneficiary has submitted an application for the aid to the Member state concerned. 
15 Komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 800/2008 artikkel 8. Selle lõikes 2 on sätestatud: „Käesoleva määruse alusel VKEdele antaval abil loetakse olevat ergutav mõju, kui abisaaja on enne projekti või tegevuse teostamiseks töö alustamist esitanud asjaomasele liikmesriigile abi saamiseks taotluse”.
16 article 43 of commission regulation (Ec) no 1974/2006. 
16 Komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 1974/2006 artikkel 43.
67 62. see reply to paragraph 83. any analysis on displacement should be thorough and detailed. its results should not lead automatically to defending national/regional/local monopolistic situations and it should rather be oriented towards the stimulation of the healthy competition between businesses with similar activities for offering high quality products/services/ activities to potential consumers. in this context, attention should be paid to quality of the services or products provided by competitors, prices, development strategies that have been or are followed, recent investments by competitors, type of structures and organisational and management matters, etc., before concluding that there have been any displacement effects. box 12 see reply to paragraph 83. box 12 — sweden see reply to paragraph 62. 
Vt vastus punktile 83. Igasugune ümberpaiknemise analüüs peaks olema põhjalik ja üksikasjalik. Selle tulemused ei tohiks automaatselt kaasa tuua riiklike/piirkondlike/kohalike monopoliolukordade kaitsmist ning see peaks olema suunatud pigem eluterve konkurentsi ergutamisele ettevõtjate vahel, kes tegelevad sarnase tegevusega võimalikele klientidele kvaliteetsete toodete/teenuste/tegevuste pakkumiseks.
Business development and investments linked to physical development are often done in stages. 
Äritegevuse arendamine ja füüsilise arenguga seotud investeeringud toimuvad sageli etappides.
Entrepreneurship and healthy competition should not be penalised nor customers should remain without a choice when making decisions, thus businesses should be allowed to introduce innovative ideas related to their medium to long-term sustainability and competitiveness, including their expansion. often, such expansion is done in stages and not in one go. 
Ettevõtlikkust ja elutervet konkurentsi ei tohiks karistada ning samuti ei tohiks jätta kliente otsuste tegemisel ilma valikuvõima-lusest, seega tuleks ettevõtjatel lubada võtta kasutusele uuenduslikke ideid seoses nende jätkusuutlikkuse ja konkurentsivõimega keskpikas ja pikas perspektiivis, sealhulgas laienemisega.
63. according to the principles of subsidiarity and shared management, the selection of projects falls under the responsibility of the Member states and the commission cannot assess the reasonableness of costs of individual projects ex ante. 
63. Subsidiaarsuse ja liikmesriikidega koostöös toimuva eelarve täitmise põhimõtete kohaselt vastutavad projektide väljavalimise eest liikmesriigid ning komisjon ei saa eelnevalt hinnata üksikute projekti kulude põhjendatust.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 65. the commission confirms that it has decided a financial correction for france because of weaknesses in the verification of the reasonableness of costs for which have been found evidence in one region in france in which concerned measures were 121 and 323. furthermore, the commission services found during a mission in 2013 similar weaknesses in another region in france which are currently being discussed with the french authorities in the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Komisjon kinnitab, et on otsustanud rakendada Prantsusmaa suhtes finantskorrektsiooni kulude põhjendatuse kontrollimisel esinevate puuduste tõttu, mille kohta leiti tõendeid ühes Prantsusmaa piirkonnas, kus oli tegemist meetmetega 121 ja 323.
66. following the court’s audit, the regional authorities took action in order to improve the verification of the reasonableness of the costs during the on-the-spot checks (new check lists). as answered by the czech authorities, there are a number of positive elements (price catalogues for building and construction, cost limits for the renewable energy projects). box 13 — sweden the estimation of the reasonability of costs is not necessarily made on the basis of comparison of offers but can be made by other means like reference costs (article 24.2d of regulation 65/2011). the commission will analyse this aspect. box 13 — italy (campania) in the case mentioned by the court, the professional fees that have been considered excessive compared to the given professional advice are in line with the indications given by the professional corporation and the national provisions on the admissibility of general costs. the regional authority has specified that a number of different consultancy services have been provided against that payment. the commission will follow up this case. 
66. Pärast kontrollikoja auditit võtsid piirkondlikud asutused meetmeid, et parandada kohapealsete kontrollide jooksul kulude põhjendatuse kontrollimist (uued kontrollnimekirjad). Tšehhi Vabariigi ametiasutuste vastusest ilmneb, et olemas on ka mitu positiivset elementi (ehituse puhul hinnakata-loogid, taastuvenergia projektide kulude piirangud).
68 67. the commission is encouraging Ms (e.g. in monitoring committees and in annual review meetings) to shorten the delay for project approval and payment to beneficiaries, and is informed that the situation is improving. 
68 67. Komisjon õhutab liikmesriike (nt seirekomisjonis ja iga-aastastel läbivaatamiskoosolekutel) lühendama projektide heakskiitmisel ja toetusesaajatele maksete tegemisel esinevaid viivitusi ning talle on teatatud, et olukord on paranemas.