natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Part XXI
peab kahetsusväärseks kontrollikoja tähelepanekuid, mille kohaselt komisjon ja Euroopa välisteenistus ei ole pööranud piisavat tähelepanu PEGASE rahastamise asendatavusele; väljendab muret ka kontrollikoja mainitud ohu pärast, et Palestiina omavalitsus võib kasutada PEGASE rahalist otsetoetust omaenda eelarve asemel selleks, et toetada oma poliitika ühise julgeolekupoliitika komponenti (toetus avalikele teenistujatele ja pensionäridele), sh võimalikku politsei ja turvapersonali rahastamist, mis ei ole PEGASE rahalise otsetoetuse suhtes abikõlblikud; nõuab, et komisjon tagaks, et rahastamine tehakse kättesaadavaks üksnes lõplikele abisaajatele, kes on kantud isikute kokkulepitud loetelusse;
Special Report No 7/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Has the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund delivered EU added value in re-integrating redundant workers?’
nõuab PEGASE rahalise otsetoetuse õiguslikku auditeerimist 2014. aasta lõpuks, et tagada, et mitte mingit osa sellest toetusest ei makstaks välja ega suunataks ebaseaduslikult abikõlbmatutele rühmadele, ja nõuab, et komisjon ja Euroopa välisteenistus püüaksid teha täielikku koostööd Palestiina omavalitsusega, et vältida PEGASE rahastamise võimalikku kõrvalesuunamist; kutsub kontrollikoda üles pakkuma abi nõuetekohase auditimetoodika kasutamisel;
Emphasises the importance it attaches to performance audits in addition to legality and regularity checks and welcomes, therefore, the Court of Auditors’ Special Report which sets out positive and negative performance aspects, thus giving a balanced overall viewpoint;
peab muret tekitavaks ka kontrollikoja tähelepanekut üha suureneva Palestiina omavalitsuse avalike teenistujate hulga kohta, kes saavad PEGASE-lt palka, ent ei käi tööl; kiidab seetõttu heaks nende programmide muutmise, et saavutada jätkusuutlik tööhõive väljavaade ning haldussuutlikkuse paranemine;
Is, however, aware that performance can only be evaluated if the objectives and indicators were decided upon in the underlying regulation; calls, therefore, on the Commission to take Parliament’s view on performance audits into consideration when it drafts new legislative proposals;
nõuab tungivalt, et komisjon ja Euroopa välisteenistus arutaksid Palestiina omavalitsusega viivitamatult vajadust kehtestada usaldusväärne sisekontrollimehhanism, et hoida ära avalike vahendite iga võimalikku kõrvalesuunamist selle eelarvest või PEGASE rahalisest otsetoetusest mis tahes füüsilisele või juriidilisele isikule, kes esindab Hamasi (mis on alates 2003. aastast ELi terrorirühmituste nimekirjas) või on sellega seotud;
Welcomes the fact that most workers affected by mass redundancies as a result of globalisation and the crisis benefitting from European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) measures were offered personalised and well-coordinated measures;
tunnistab piiranguid, mis Iisraeli valitsus on Palestiina omavalitsusele kehtestanud, muu hulgas:
Notes with satisfaction that EGF measures were generally well-coordinated with national and European Social Fund (ESF) measures;
Iisraeli valitsus peatab aeg-ajalt tollitulude ülekandmise Palestiina omavalitsusele – need on kaudsed maksud, mida Iisrael Palestiina omavalitsuse nimel imporditud kaupadelt kogub ja mis moodustavad umbes 70 % Palestiina omavalitsuse eelarvest;
Takes note of the arguments offered by the Member States who did not want to take the EGF very seriously; notes that the arguments were the following:
läbipaistvuse puudumine tasude osas, mida Iisrael Palestiina omavalitsuselt kaupade ja teenuste eest võtab;
the higher co-financing rate for the ESF (in some cases up to 85 %) than for the EGF (up to 65 %) is a disincentive to apply for the latter; welcomes therefore the Commission reconsideration of the co-financing rates for the forthcoming EGF period;
Iisraeli jätkuv kontroll Jordani Läänekalda piirkonna C üle, mis on oluline takistus Palestiina omavalitsuse pikaajalisele ja jätkusuutlikule arengule;
the ESF can be implemented more swiftly than the EGF, or national administrations are more familiar with the ESF;
Iisraeli valitsuse kehtestud piirangud Palestiina ettevõtjate suhtes, mida on kirjeldatud kontrollikoja auditiauruandes;
the lack of EGF pre-financing;
kutsub komisjoni ja Euroopa välisteenistust üles jätkama nende probleemide lahendamist Iisraeli valitsusega ja tuletama Iisraelile meelde tema kui okupeeriva võimu rahvusvahelisest õigusest tulenevaid kohustusi;
the more restrictive EGF conditions, in particular the trade criterion as the main intervention criterion for applications based on globalisation;
kutsub komisjoni ja Euroopa välisteenistust üles tulevikus PEGASE otsetoetuste mehhanismi läbi vaadates täielikult arvesse võtma kontrollikoja tähelepanekuid ja järeldusi ning täielikult täitma tema soovitusi;
the length of the procedure for approving EGF application;
arvestades programmitöö perioodiga 2014–2020 ning ELi ja Palestiina omavalitsuse uue tegevuskavaga kaasnevaid võimalusi, soovitab kontrollikoda Euroopa välisteenistusel ja komisjonil PEGASE rahastamismehhanism põhjalikult üle vaadata, võttes arvesse järgmises punktis loetletud alapunkte;
Reiterates the fact, nevertheless, that the EGF and the ESF can be seen as complementary instruments; asks the Commission, however, to make clear the rationale for setting the EGF apart from the ESF, as the ESF turns out to be in some cases better adjusted at delivering timely results and has in some cases better co- and pre-financing rates; notes, moreover, that the ESF is more well-known among the Union public in some Member States than the EGF [27];
Euroopa välisteenistus ja komisjon peaksid tulevase PEGASE rahastamismehhanismi kavandamist tõhustama, eelkõige:
Emphasises that it is in the interest of sound financial management that the reintegration of the unemployed into the labour market following their participation in EGF measures can be reliably determined; believes that the EGF Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [28]) should therefore encourage Member States to measure re-integration beyond the end of the implementation period and in addition, that these data should be comparable and preferably interlinked with quantitative objectives;
siduma selle tihedamalt ELi ja Palestiina omavalitsuse uue tegevuskavaga;
Welcomes, in the context of the new EGF Regulation for the 2014-2020 programming period (Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [29]), the fact that the Commission has proposed a re-integration objective of 50 % of the redundant workforce to have found new jobs after 12 months of implementation; asks, however, on what rationale this figure is based;
planeerima assigneeringuid mitme aasta põhiselt;
Holds the firm view that EGF assistance should primarily be used for retraining and qualification and other targeted active labour market measures, and not on income support which would in any case be paid by national unemployment schemes; asks therefore for income support to be limited to 25 % per EGF measures;
töötama välja tulemusnäitajad, eriti tervishoiu, hariduse ja riigi avaliku finantsjuhtimise valdkondades, et toetuse tulemusi paremini hinnata ja näidata;
Underlines the fact that Union financial assistance should create European added-value; asks, therefore, that the Union added value of the EGF measures, as compared to the Union added value of the ESF measures, be considered in its quantitative and qualitative aspects in the annual discharge procedure in order to ensure the most effective policy measurements or to provide the reasons for not including these figures; shares the Court of Auditors’ view that a period of 41 weeks between submitting an application for EGF assistance and payments is unacceptably high and that such a duration discourages applicant countries in distress and in need of Union solidarity; notes, however, the information supplied by the Commission in its replies; reminds all parties concerned of the Union’s budgetary authorities’ decision not to integrate the EGF into the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which means that all applications have to undergo a specific budgetary procedure, and notwithstanding the above explanations, calls on all the parties concerned to switch to e-applications and to limit additional information after the original application to exceptional cases, and in any case, no later than three months after the original application;
töötama välja usaldusväärse sisekontrollimehhanismi, et tagada väljamaksekriteeriumidest kinnipidamine ja vältida PEGASE rahalise otsetoetuse mis tahes kõrvalejuhtimist;
Holds the view, however, that such an important policy instrument should be thoroughly evaluated and proposes, therefore, to link the review of the EGF 2014-2020 to the proposed mid-term review of the MFF 2014-2020;
Komisjon peaks PEGASE rahastamismehhanismi haldamise kulusid vähendama,
Part XXII
kasutades võimalusel võistlevat hankemenetlust lepingute puhul, mis on seotud PEGASE juhtimise ja kontrolliga;
Special Report No 8/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development’
lihtsustades PEGASE juhtimissüsteemi, tehes ELi esindajale Palestiinas ülesandeks hallata PEGASE andmebaasi ja teha ise osa kontrollidest, mida praegu teostavad töövõtjad;
Notes that the Commission should:
teeb presidendile ülesandeks edastada käesolev resolutsioon nõukogule, komisjonile, Euroopa Liidu Kohtule ja kontrollikojale ning korraldada selle avaldamine Euroopa Liidu Teatajas (L-seerias).
define and assess Union needs for improving the economic value of the forests and in that respect integrate efforts and insights of related policy fields;
Vastuvõetud tekstid, P7_TA(2014)0287 (vt käesoleva Euroopa Liidu Teataja lk 30).
clearly define the key features that would ensure that Union support is targeted to address those needs, and thus create Union added value;
Maailma Terviseorganisatsiooni (WHO) hinnangul aitaksid parem veevarustus, paremad sanitaartingimused ja hügieen kogu maailmas suremust 6,3 % (vaid arenguriike arvestades oleks see määr 8 %) võrra vähendada.
Notes that the Member States should:
Eelkõige aitaks see vähendada arenguriikide laste suremust.
adequately describe in their RDPs the specific economic needs and opportunities of the different types of forest areas and beneficiaries;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 29. aprilli 2004. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 882/2004 ametlike kontrollide kohta, mida tehakse sööda- ja toidualaste õigusnormide ning loomatervishoidu ja loomade heaolu käsitlevate eeskirjade täitmise kontrollimise tagamiseks (ELT L 165, 30.4.2004, lk 1).
enhance forest management by providing for the elaboration of forest management plans for the bulk of forest holdings and the promotion of certification of forest areas;
ELT L 286, 17.10.2012, lk 376.
set adequate requirements to ensure that forestry support within the rural development policy is consistent, in line with state aid and other policy areas provisions, thus maximising its effectiveness;
ELT L 286, 17.10.2012, lk 387.
put in place adequate procedures to ensure that support is effective so as to actually increase the economic value of the forest areas where the investments take place;
Vastuvõetud tekstid, P7_TA(2013)0187.
Notes that the Commission should improve its monitoring of the measure in order to ensure that the Member States implement it in line with the specific objectives set and in order to obtain short and long term sustainability; notes that in concrete terms, the Member States should require beneficiaries to provide details of the value of their forest areas both prior to and after the aided investments and managing bodies should be required to validate these values;
COM(2013) 246, 22. aprill 2013.
Part XXIII
ELT C 99 E, 3.4.2012, lk 64.
Special Report No 9/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU support for governance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’
ELT C 169 E, 15.6.2012, lk 66.
In close coordination with the national authorities and other development partners, notably Member States, the Commission and the EEAS should:
ELT L 315, 14.11.2012, lk 1.
with a view to programming for the 11th EDF and the design of future Union programmes, (i) pay increased attention to ensuring an appropriate balance of aid between provinces, especially the poorer ones, in order to avoid geographical disparities in the distribution of development aid while bearing in mind the importance of stabilising the Great Lakes region as a whole; (ii) combine support at a central level with programmes at the provincial level that link political and territorial decentralisation with improved natural resource management strategies and infrastructure rehabilitation and development; and (iii) reconsider Union support for improved management of natural resources on the basis of a comprehensive needs assessment;
KOM(2011) 751, 15. november 2011.
place greater emphasis, in its dialogue with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) government, on the fact that democratic elections are a key component of governance and carefully assess all risks to ensure that Union programmes in this area do not support regime entrenchment;
KOM(2011) 752, 15. november 2011.
promote improved DRC government accountability by considering increased support to strengthen the capacity of national oversight institutions, in particular the specialised committees of the National Assembly and the supreme audit institution;
KOM(2011) 752, artikli 50 lõige 6.
in all governance areas covered by the Union cooperation strategy, systematically consider the need to support the fight against fraud and corruption, as well as the reform of the judiciary;
Euroopa Kontrollikoja presidendi Victor Caldera kiri, 10. detsember 2010 – CPT11656EN01-10PP-OR.doc.
The Commission should:
EÜT L 311, 14.11.2002, lk 3.
at the outset of programmes and regularly during their implementation, assess the likelihood and potential impact of the main risks to the achievement of programme objectives; notes that this will involve (i) appraising the relevance and credibility of the country’s policies and action plans for improving governance in relation to the available institutional and financial resources and (ii) monitoring progress against commitments made by the DRC authorities;
Euroopa Kontrollikoja pressiteade ECA/13/05.
establish measures to prevent or mitigate risks and clearly define the course of action to be followed if risks become reality, bearing in mind the risks of fraud and corruption in particular;
Komisjon on seisukohal, et „alaline” ei ole „durabile” õige tõlge.
focus objectives on a limited number of priorities;
Õige oleks „püsiv”.
set out a time frame, including mid-term evaluations, which is better adapted to the programme environment;
COM(2013) 623, 10. september 2013.
provide for flexibility during programme implementation so that objectives can be reviewed promptly where appropriate;
ELT C 168 E, 14.6.2013, lk 72.
The Commission and the EEAS should:
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 11. detsembri 2013. aasta määrus (EL) nr 1315/2013 üleeuroopalise transpordivõrgu arendamist käsitlevate liidu suuniste kohta ja millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks otsus nr 661/2010/EL (ELT L 348, 20.12.2013, lk 1).
strengthen their structured political and policy dialogue with the country; notes that this will involve, in full respect of the provisions of the Cotonou Agreement (notably article 96) (i) setting clear, relevant, realistic and time-bound targets which are mutually agreed upon with the national authorities, (ii) periodically assessing compliance with the agreed targets as part of the regular political dialogue with the government, and (iii) if the DRC government shows insufficient commitment to compliance, consider, after careful deliberation, adapting or in exceptional cases, suspending or terminating the programme;
ELT L 406, 30.12.2006, lk 1.
urge the DRC government to adopt the necessary measures for improving, where necessary, the functioning of the thematic working groups, and monitor the implementation of those measures;
ELT L 347, 20.12.2013, lk 855.
take a more active leadership role towards Member States to encourage coordinated policy dialogue and increase Union leverage over the DRC government;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 17. detsembri 2013. aasta määrus (EL) nr 1307/2013, millega kehtestatakse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika raames toetuskavade alusel põllumajandustootjatele makstavate otsetoetuste eeskirjad ning tunnistatakse kehtetuks nõukogu määrused (EÜ) nr 637/2008 ja (EÜ) nr 73/2009 (ELT L 347, 20.12.2013, lk 608).
provide Parliament by May 2014 with an overview of the state of play of the projects visited by the Court of Auditors, and
Raamistik ja järelevalve
provide Parliament by June 2014 with an overview of all on-going projects in DRC and inform it on how much money will be still available and from which funds;
Art.
Part XXIV
I. I moduli abitativi destinati ad una durevole utilizzazione di cui all’articolo 2 del decreto legge 28 aprile 2009, n.
Special Report No 10/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Common Agricultural Policy: Is the specific support provided under Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 well designed and implemented?’
39, convertito con modificazione alla legge 24 giugno 2009, 11.77, identificati dalle corrispondenti unita immobiliari riepilogate nell’allegato n.
Specific support for certain agricultural activities should be based on a strict understanding of the provisions of Article 68 and the new delegated acts should require that the granting of such coupled support should be adequately justified to the Commission and checked by it; notes that to be able to assume its ultimate responsibility under the system of shared management, the Commission should play a more active role in establishing the criteria governing the implementation of the measures, and in assessing measures in a comparative way to avoid unexplained and extreme variations in prices, such as those identified in the examples for goats in this Special Report; notes that the legal tools to do this should be established in the new delegated acts; notes that the Member States should be required, in the new delegated acts, to demonstrate that each specific support measure which they intend to introduce is necessary (in terms of the need for and added value of an approach based on derogations), relevant (in terms of implementation arrangements, award criteria and aid levels), and that it satisfies the criteria of sound financial management; in particular and in response to the point expressed by the Court of Auditors that ‘clearly defined cases’ were not clearly defined, implementation of the new Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [30] should overcome the problems identified, by Member States:
1, che costituisce parte integrante e sostanziale del presente decreto, sono assegnati in proprietą a titolo gratuito al Comune di L’Aquila.
establishing clear targets (as per Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012);
„Parem koolitus ohutuma toidu nimel”
creating systematic monitoring systems for all measures taken under the new Articles 52-55 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013;
võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu 2012. aasta üldeelarvet [1],võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu 2012. aasta konsolideeritud raamatupidamise aastaaruannet (COM(2013) 570 – C7-0237/2013) [2],võttes arvesse Euroopa Kontrollikoja aastaaruannet eelarveaasta 2012 eelarve täitmise kohta koos institutsioonide vastustega [3] ja kontrollikoja eriaruandeid,võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 287 kohaselt 2012. aasta kohta koostatud kontrollikoja kinnitavat avaldust, [4] mis kinnitab raamatupidamiskontode usaldatavust ja nende aluseks olevate tehingute seaduslikkust ja korrektsust,võttes arvesse oma 3. aprilli 2014. aasta otsust Euroopa Liidu 2011. aasta üldeelarve (III jagu – komisjon) täitmisele heakskiidu andmise kohta [5] ning oma resolutsiooni tähelepanekutega, mis on kõnealuse otsuse lahutamatu osa,võttes arvesse vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 287 lõike 4 teisele lõigule koostatud kontrollikoja eriaruandeid,
respecting uniformity in application across the Union so that management and control systems can be streamlined, simple, and comparable;
tähelepanekutega, mis on Euroopa Liidu 2012. aasta üldeelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmist käsitleva Euroopa Parlamendi otsuse lahutamatu osa, X jagu – Euroopa välisteenistus
ensuring documentation of all measures/sub-measures and the use of up to date integrated administration control system (IACS) information where relevant;
võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu 2012. aasta üldeelarvet [1],võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu 2012. aasta konsolideeritud raamatupidamise aastaaruannet (COM(2013) 570 – C7-0282/2013) [2],võttes arvesse kontrollikoja aastaaruannet 2012. aasta eelarve täitmise kohta ning institutsioonide vastuseid [3],võttes arvesse vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklile 287 tehtud kontrollikoja avaldust, mis kinnitab 2012. aasta raamatupidamiskontode usaldatavust ja nende aluseks olevate tehingute seaduslikkust ja korrektsust [4],võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 314 lõiget 10 ning artikleid 317, 318 ja 319,
establishing rigorous on-the-spot checks at regional and Member State level;
võttes arvesse nõukogu 25. juuni 2002. aasta määrust (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1605/2002 (mis käsitleb Euroopa ühenduste üldeelarve suhtes kohaldatavat finantsmäärust), [5] eriti selle artikleid 50, 86, 145, 146 ja 147,võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 25. oktoobri 2012. aasta määrust (EL, Euratom) nr 966/2012 (mis käsitleb Euroopa Liidu üldeelarve suhtes kohaldatavaid finantseeskirju ning millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks nõukogu määrus (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1605/2002), [6] eriti selle artikleid 164, 165, 166 ja 167,võttes arvesse oma varasemaid eelarve täitmisele heakskiidu andmist käsitlevaid otsuseid ja resolutsioone,
Taking account of the variety of possible measures an appropriate system of monitoring should be established to facilitate subsequent evaluation;
võttes arvesse eelarvekontrollikomisjoni raportit ning väliskomisjoni arvamust (A7-0199/2014),
Once measures have been introduced, the Member States should establish suitable and comprehensive management and control systems to ensure that all the requirements of the Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 can be satisfied; notes that in order to avoid generating disproportionate costs on the limited scale of a specific support measure, the requirement for controls should already be taken into account during the measure’s design phase (simplicity of implementation, ‘controllability’ of criteria, etc.) or possibly even in the decision on whether or not to introduce a given measure;
märgib, et kontrollikoda jõudis oma audititööle tuginedes järeldusele, et institutsioonide ja asutuste 31. detsembril 2012 lõppenud eelarveaasta haldus- ja muude kulude maksed tervikuna ei sisaldanud olulisi vigu;
Part XXV
väljendab heameelt selle üle, et Euroopa välisteenistus on jätkanud teisel eelarveaastal eelarve täitmist, ilma et kontrollikoda oleks tuvastanud olulisi vigu, ning selle üle, et enamus kontrollikoja 2011. aasta aruandes välja toodud teenistuse asutamisest tingitud probleemidest ei ole kordunud;
Special Report No 12/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent?’
juhib tähelepanu asjaolule, et oma aruandes 2012. aasta kohta ei leidnud kontrollikoda olulisi puudusi seoses Euroopa välisteenistuse juures auditeeritud teemadega; märgib, et esineb veel mõningaid puudusi seoses sotsiaaltoetuste haldamisega, ning väljendab kahetsust, et samadest probleemidest, mis esinesid 2011. aastal, teatati uuesti kontrollikoja aruandes 2012. aasta kohta; nõuab, et Euroopa välisteenistus viiks ellu kõik soovitused; tervitab samme, mis Euroopa välisteenistus on seni sellega seoses astunud, ning ergutab teda kiirendama uue programmi kasutuselevõttu probleemi lahendamiseks;