natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ report on the four selected agencies because they have the highest exposure to an impartiality risk, due to their significant decision-making powers in areas of vital importance to the health and safety of consumers; notes that this report is a result of Parliament asking the Court of Auditors to undertake a comprehensive analysis of the agencies’ approach to the management of situations where there are potential conflicts of interest; supports all the Court of Auditors’ recommendations;
on mures suure hulga puudujääkide pärast, mis kontrollikoda auditi käigus tuvastas, eelkõige järgmiste puudujääkide pärast:
Points out that the agencies carry out technical, operational and regulatory tasks and play a vital role in implementing and raising the profile of Union policies; stresses the importance of the agencies being autonomous and independent;
õigusaktid võeti vastu liiga hilja, komisjon esitas liiga hilja rakenduseeskirjad ja põhisuunised;
Notes that all the Union institutions, agencies and joint undertakings, without exception, are exposed to the risk of conflict of interest; stresses, nevertheless, the specific needs of the decentralised agencies in terms of conflict of interest management, given the broad diversity of actors involved in their work;
fondide mõjusust ei saanud mõõta, sest liikmesriigid ei olnud loonud tõhusaid järelevalve- ja hindamissüsteeme programmide edust teavitamiseks;
Points out that the poor management of conflicts of interest may have a strong and lasting negative impact on the image of the Union institutions and on citizens’ confidence in their ability to serve the interests of society;
auditeeritud liikmesriigid ei seadnud oma iga-aastastes programmides nõuetekohaseid eesmärke või näitajaid ja see takistas asjakohaselt hindamast fondide panust integratsiooni;
Recalls that Parliament postponed its approval of the 2010 accounts of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) [10] and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [11] partly due to what it considered to be an unsatisfactory management of conflict of interest;
püsivad puudused ja tegematajätmised seoses sertifitseerimis- ja auditeerimisasutustega; puudusi esines liikmesriikide juhtimis- ja kontrollisüsteemide heakskiitmisel komisjoni poolt;
Regrets that there is currently no comprehensive Union regulatory framework dedicated to conflict of interest which would make it possible to impose comparable basic requirements in terms of independence and transparency applicable to all Union agencies;
fondide mõjusust on pärssinud programmi SOLID (üldprogramm „Solidaarsus ja rändevoogude juhtimine aastatel 2007–2013”) ülesehitus, sest see on killustatud ja ebapiisavalt kooskõlastatud teiste ELi fondidega;
Recognises the value of the OECD guidelines on managing conflicts of interest, which set an international benchmark on this issue; stresses, however, that although the OECD guidelines offer an international benchmark, they relate essentially to conflicts of interest concerning public sector employees and cannot, therefore, provide an adequate basis for an effective response in the case of potential conflicts of interests among the governing bodies and other bodies involved in the agencies’ work, such as management boards and expert panels; recognises, nevertheless, the value of the OECD’s toolkit, and especially the checklist for gifts and benefits etc., as well as recommendations made concerning penalties, the need to check the completeness and content of declarations of interests and the requirement to harness expertise and identify potential conflicts of interest;
Euroopa Pagulasfondi ja Euroopa Integratsioonifondi loomisel ei ole arvesse võetud struktuurifondidega saadud kogemusi;
Recalls that in July 2012, after three years of analysis and negotiations, the Commission, the Council and Parliament finally adopted the ‘Common Approach’, a political agreement concerning the future and the reform of the decentralised agencies; welcomes the fact that the Commission soon adopted thereafter a roadmap for the implementation of this Common Approach; notes that the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in the agencies was one of the Commission’s priority actions for 2013 but regrets that it intended to implement and launch this action alone;
komisjoni vahearuanne, mille aluseks on liikmesriikide aruanded, esitati hilinemisega ja programmide kvantitatiivsed tulemused piirdusid vaid igas liikmesriigis rahastatud projektide arvuga ning aruanne põhines kavadel, mitte tegelikul rakendamisel; aruandes ei viidata kulutatud summadele;
Draws the Commission’s attention to the need for a common regulatory framework on this matter; stresses the importance of it being a concerted action and calls for Parliament to be closely involved; asks the Commission to respect the proposed deadline for implementing this action and to report to the discharge authority on its outcome by May 2014, attaching the relevant legislative proposals to its report;
kolme ametkonda hõlmav pikk kontrolliahel, mis on liigne halduskoormus, arvestades fondide mahtu;
Asks the Commission to bear in mind the need to maintain a balance between the risks and the benefits, in particular as regards the management of conflicts of interest on the one hand, and the objective of obtaining the best possible scientific advice on the other; notes with concern, furthermore, that the adoption of ethical standards, codes and guidelines does not guarantee the absence of conflicts of interest; observes that this will require the implementation of simple and applicable standards, together with regular and effective ex ante and ex post controls and clear sanctions, thereof, in the context of a culture of honesty, integrity and transparency;
tervitab komisjoni ettepanekut võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega luuakse Varjupaiga- ja Rändefond, [17] ning ettepanekut võtta vastu Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus, millega kehtestatakse Varjupaiga- ja Rändefondi ning politseikoostöö, kuritegevuse tõkestamise ja piiriülese, raske ja organiseeritud kuritegevuse vastu võitlemise rahastamisvahendi suhtes kohaldatavad üldsätted [18];
Notes that the Court of Auditors identified a number of significant shortcomings relating to post-employment issues (‘revolving doors’, ‘insider information’); stresses that this issue is not solely limited to the agencies; notes that in light of its impact on its image and on Union citizens’ trust, the Commission needs to address these issues without delay by means of action to be taken by both the agencies and by all Union institutions;
peab tervitatavaks asjaolu, et komisjon on võtnud kuulda mitut kontrollikoja soovitust ja lisanud vastavad sätted oma uutesse Varjupaiga- ja Rändefondi käsitlevatesse ettepanekutesse, ning kutsub nõukogu üles neid sätteid toetama;
Welcomes the European Ombudsman’s decision to conduct an own initiative inquiry into cases of ‘revolving door-type’ conflicts of interest in several recently reported cases at the Commission; echoes the warning issued by the Ombudsman to the effect that although the effective management of conflicts of interest is a key part of good governance and sound ethical conduct, not all problems relating to governance and ethics necessarily imply a conflict of interest, meaning that conflicts of interest need to be viewed within their strict limits and training and prevention strategies promoted in respect of conflicts of interest in Union institutions;
tervitab komisjoni ettepanekut kohustuslike ühiste näitajate kehtestamise kohta alates ajavahemiku 2014–2020 uue programmi algusest ning selget viidet näitajate andmete säilitamise ja edastamise arvutipõhisele süsteemile;
Expresses its concern at the fact that none of the four agencies selected managed conflicts of interest in a fully satisfactory manner at the time of the Court of Auditors’ analysis;
peab väga tähtsaks, et liikmesriikidel oleks võimalik koguda andmeid kogu programmitöö perioodil;
Considers that the main added value of Special Report No 15/2012 of the Court of Auditors lies in the regular monitoring of the agencies’ progress as regards management and prevention of conflicts of interest; welcomes the fact that following the Court’s audits and Parliament’s review and approval procedures for the 2010 and 2011 discharges, significant improvements have already been implemented by the relevant agencies;
ergutab liikmesriike kehtestama riiklikul tasandil vastavad oma näitajad ja riiklike programmide sihtväärtused ning esitama oma hindamisaruanded õigeks ajaks;
Calls on the Court of Auditors to continue monitoring the measures put in place by the agencies to follow-up on its recommendations, to extend the scope of its audit to the other agencies and to present its observations in a special report on this matter in the near future; urges the agencies to continue to report to the discharge authority on the progress made in this area;
palub komisjonil võtta 31. oktoobriks 2012 esitatavate riiklike hindamisaruannete põhjal järelmeetmeid;
Stresses the importance of coordination and the exchange of information and good practice between Union agencies; reiterates the important role of the network of agencies in coordinating information exchange, both among the agencies themselves and between the agencies and the Commission, the Court of Auditors and Parliament;
märgib murelikult, et kontrollikoja 2007.–2013. aasta auditis tuvastati, et teatavates liikmesriikides ei konsulteerita partneritega piisavalt; tunneb muret, et partnerluse puudumist täheldati eriti seoses ESFi asutustega ning see põhjustas kattuvusi ja võimaliku sünergia kasutamata jätmist;
Emphasises the importance of determining which agencies and which of their areas of operation are most at risk from conflicts of interest; welcomes, in that context, the review of the Transparency Register for lobby groups at the Union institutions and urges the Commission and the agencies to implement the measures stemming from that review concerning potential conflicts of interest;
tervitab selles kontekstis aastate 2014–2020 ettepaneku tugevdatud sätteid, kus partnerlus hõlmab pädevaid piirkondlikke, kohalikke, linna- ja muid avalikke asutusi;
Points out that a high-level of transparency is essential to mitigate risks of conflict of interest; calls on all the agencies to publish a list of their management boards members, management staff, external and in-house experts, together with their respective declarations of interest and curricula vitae on their websites; suggests, also, that the minutes of the meetings of their management boards should be systematically published;
väljendab heameelt järelevalvekomisjonide loomise üle „riiklike programmide rakendamise toetamiseks”; soovitab kasutada võimalikult palju ära kogemust, mis saadi sama mehhanismi kasutamisel struktuurifondide puhul;
Notes that because of the austerity policies currently being pursued, staff cuts in public administrations and the outsourcing of tasks to the private sector are greatly increasing the risk of conflicts of interest; calls for a strengthening of the Union civil service;
märgib murelikult, et aastapõhise programmitöö süsteem kujutab endast liigset halduskoormust nii liikmesriikide kui ka komisjoni jaoks; tervitab uut ettepanekut, millega asendatakse aastapõhised programmid riiklike programmidega, mis kestavad 1. jaanuarist 2014 kuni 31. detsembrini 2020;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation calling on all Union institutions and decentralised bodies to examine whether the recommendations of its Special Report No 15/2012 are relevant and applicable to them;
toetab komisjoni ettepanekut luua liikmesriikidest ja komisjonist koosnev järelevalve- ja hindamisvõrgustik, et hõlbustada heade järelevalve- ja hindamistavade vahetamist;
Part VI
väljendab rahulolu sertifitseerimisasutuse kaotamise üle ja on veendunud, et kahetasandiline struktuur (vastutav asutus, auditeerimisasutus) saavutab suurema tõhususe ja kontrollide lihtsustamise;
Special Report No 16/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States’
nõuab, et komisjon arutaks liikmesriikidega uue fondi rakendamise suuniseid ja võtaks need võimalikult kiiresti vastu, võttes nõuetekohaselt arvesse uue fondi vastuvõtmise ajakava;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report on the effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States, and endorses its recommendations;
rõhutab etteteatamata kohapealsete kontrollide tähtsust;
Believes that in future, income support should be directed to active farmers who engage in agricultural activities; believes, in particular, that public entities managing state land and not otherwise involved in farming should be excluded from Single Area Payment Scheme (SAPS) income support; notes, with a view to the new CAP, that the Member States should ensure that aid is only paid to active farmers and that no derogations from this principle are applied; is of the opinion that the Commission should ensure that the rules are implemented consistently among Member States in order to ensure, for example, that the same types of beneficiary are excluded in all Member States;
on veendunud, et liikmesriike ei tohiks vabastada nende kohustustest, ja on seetõttu seisukohal, et komisjoni ettepanek kuni 100 % maksmise kohta erakorralise abi vajaduse korral tuleks asendada väljendiga „üle 90 %”;
Stresses that the eligibility of land for aid should be clearly defined and limited to parcels on which Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAEC) standards require agricultural activities to be carried out; notes, with a view to the new CAP, that the eligibility of land should be clearly defined so as to exclude land that does not contribute to increasing agricultural productivity or to actively maintaining the environmental value of the land; believes, furthermore, that aid should only be paid for land on which well-defined and regular activities are carried out;
toetab komisjoni ettepanekut riiklike programmide regulaarse toetamise kohta kuni 75 % ulatuses; on veendumusel, et asjakohaselt ja rangelt tuleks määratleda „nõuetekohaselt põhjendatud juhtumid”, mille puhul luuakse võimalus anda liidu eelarvest 90 %-list toetust;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation and the Commission’s proposal for a more balanced distribution of aid through several measures such as the progressive reduction and capping of direct payments and the regional allocation of national ceilings;
on veendunud, et lisaks 4 % esialgsele eelmaksele kogu programmitöö perioodiks tuleks lisada 2,5 % iga-aastane eelrahastamine, et vähendada likviidsusprobleeme;
Calls on the Commission to analyse the extent to which the effectiveness and efficiency of direct payments are adversely affected by structural weaknesses and land prices; believes that on the basis of this analysis, the Commission should take complementary measures to restructure the sector and render it more competitive;
märgib, et Varjupaiga- ja Rändefondi ning ESFi poliitilistes prioriteetides on kattuvusi, eelkõige seoses kolmandate riikide kodanike integreerimisega, ja tervitab komisjoni kavatsust võtta „arvesse ka vastastikust täiendavust erimääruste alusel rakendatud meetmete ja teiste asjaomaste ühenduse poliitikavaldkondade, vahendite ja algatuste raames rakendatud meetmete vahel” [19];
Invites Member States to consult with the Commission as they prepare for the introduction of a future entitlement-based scheme; believes in particular that Member States could use the Commission’s assistance to help identify key requirements for national administrations and farmers;
on siiski veendunud, et oleks asjakohane ja kooskõlas subsidiaarsuse põhimõttega anda seda soovivatele liikmesriikidele võimalus näha oma programmides ette kahe kõnealuse fondi sünergia ja vastastikuse täiendavuse tase ja ulatus; kutsub sellega seoses komisjoni üles võtma asjakohaselt arvesse ja kasutama kahe fondi vahelise sünergia suurendamise võimalust liikmesriikidega sõlmitavates partnerluslepingutes;
Regrets the fact that the new CAP, especially the pillar for direct payments, does not contain specific objectives, targets or anticipated results; observes that this means that the single biggest item in the Union budget is being paid out without any clear objectives or anticipated results;
palub komisjonil ergutada liikmesriike esitama üksikasjalikumat teavet liidu fondide sidususe ja vastastikuse täiendavuse kohta;
Part VII
kiidab edukat tööd Euroopa struktuuri- ja investeerimisfondidega ühise IT-süsteemi tagamisel;
Special Report No 17/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The European Development Fund (EDF) contribution to a sustainable road network in sub-Saharan Africa’
XII osa
Welcomes the fact that in many of the partner countries visited, technical cooperation has also contributed to the drafting of road sector strategies and improved the supervision of road maintenance and that training activities have been well-organised and effective while technical studies in a wide range of areas have provided useful information for policy decision-making;
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 23/2012 „Kas ELi struktuurimeetmed on edukalt toetanud mahajäetud tööstus- ja militaaralade taaselustamist?”
Regrets that, in general, the support provided by Commission is not totally effective in promoting the adoption and implementation of the policy reforms that are required to address the existing obstacles to a sustainable road network in sub-Saharan Africa;
rõhutab militaar- ja tööstusalade taaselustamise olulist rolli esimese sammuna piirkonna atraktiivsuse suurendamise suunas, sest see on eelduseks töökohti loovatele majandustegevustele, avalike ruumide loomisele jne;
Notes that partner countries do not do enough to ensure the sustainability of road infrastructure and that roads are affected to varying degrees by premature deterioration; acknowledges that most of the partner countries have made significant progress on road maintenance but notes that it remains insufficient and maintenance is often carried out late or incompletely; notes, furthermore, that most of the partner countries have made unsatisfactory progress on vehicle overloading, which has an important impact on road life expectancy and maintenance costs;
võtab teadmiseks kontrollikoja eriaruande „Kas ELi struktuurimeetmed on edukalt toetanud mahajäetud tööstus- ja militaaralade taaselustamist?” ja selle soovitused;
Takes the view that the maintenance of roads should be preferably done on a local level basis when outsourced to private business-contractors, thereby supporting small undertakings and local communities and ensuring the creation of skilled labour pools;
väljendab heameelt selle üle, et kõikidel projektidel oli teatavaid põhiomadusi, mis avaldasid nende jätkusuutlikkusele positiivset mõju ning et 22st lõpetatud projektist 18 saavutas täielikult oma füüsilistele väljunditele seatud eesmärgid ning neli projekti saavutas 90–100 % oodatud füüsilistest väljunditest;
Calls on the Commission to attach mandatory conditions to its financial support and to react appropriately when partner countries fail to comply with their commitments; encourages the Commission to use policy dialogue to its full potential; takes note that this dialogue has been instrumental in promoting progress in some areas, notably where the institutional framework and road maintenance funding are concerned; is of the opinion that funded projects may only be approved if the necessary technical equipment to maintain the road is available beforehand or can be assured when needed;
toonitab, et prioriteetsena tuleks käsitada ümberehitusprojekte, mis loovad võimalusi majandustegevuseks, näiteks töökohade loomiseks, ning usub, et liidu kulutuste keskmes peaks olema lõppkasutuse kontseptsioon; toonitab, et mahajäetud tööstusalasid tuleks taaselustada, ning et rohealade kasutamist tuleks näha viimase võimalusena ainult äärmise majandusliku vajaduse korral;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation that the Commission should focus EDF funding in the road sector where the greatest impact can be achieved by (i) focusing resources on road sectors in partner countries which implement appropriate sector policies, (ii) focusing EDF resources in countries where the EDF has financed substantial road infrastructure investments in the past, and (iii) raising the leverage effect of EDF resources by combining these grants with loans and promoting private sector participation in financing the upgrading and expansion of the road network;
rõhutab vajadust usaldusväärsete andmete järele tõhususe ja tulemuste hindamise tagamiseks ning kutsub komisjoni üles astuma samme selliste andmete kogumiseks (loetelu, saastatuse tase jne); kutsub liikmesriike koostama mahajäetud tööstusalade loetelusid ja koondama andmeid kõigi selliste alade seisukorra kohta (saastatuse tase), mis võimaldaks määrata liidu rahastamise prioriteete;
Fully endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation that the Commission should define clear, measurable and time-bound formal conditions that address the main policy reform needs in relation to road maintenance and vehicle overloading and carry out periodic and structured analyses of the fulfilment of conditions, as well as periodic country road sector evaluations and ex post project evaluations;
kutsub komisjoni ja liikmesriike üles kohaldama kõigis toetuslepingutes tagasimakseklauslit; usub, et tagasimakseklausel peaks võtma arvesse pikaajalisuse/olelustsükli põhimõtet ning et korduvhindamine peaks arvestama 15-aastast perioodi, mil taaselustamisprojekt peaks küpsema ja tooma tulu;
Invites the Commission to present a report, within six months, on how defining the Commission policy on road infrastructure takes into account the protection of the environment and the promotion of road safety; notes in this regard that the road network in sub-Saharan Africa is used for all sort of transit activities, mixing slow and fast traffic including for example road walking schoolchildren and therefore, safety concerns are of major importance; would also like to be informed about how Union funded projects are coordinated with other donors and organisations, not only in the field of road construction but also in matters concerning planning and maintenance;
peab kahetsusväärseks, et kuigi ametiasutused on teadlikud põhimõttest „saastaja maksab”, ei ole saastaja kandnud ühelgi auditeeritud juhtumil kõiki saastatusest puhastamise kulusid; tunnistab, et põhimõtte „saastaja maksab” rakendamine on keeruline ülesanne; kutsub liikmesriike siiski võtma meetmeid selleks, et ületada saastaja kindlakstegemisel esinevad raskused, ja nõuab tungivalt, et komisjon nõuaks liidu rahastamise tingimusena põhimõtte „saastaja maksab” rakendamist;
Recommends that the Commission responds firmly, proportionately and in a timely manner when governments show unsatisfactory commitment to addressing the issues raised and recommendations made including to assess the suspension or cancellation of EDF funding to individual programmes or the road sector as a whole;
tervitab komisjoni ettepanekut võtta vastu mullakaitse raamdirektiiv (KOM(2006) 232), mis sisaldab mitmeid kontrollikoja poolt kindlaks tehtud ja kontrollikoja soovitustes nimetatud probleeme käsitlevaid sätteid, ning palub tungivalt, et nõukogu toetaks komisjoni ettepanekut;
Supports the Court of Auditors’ proposal that the Commission should endeavour to ensure that there is credible government ownership of the planned activities, increase its focus on the root causes of vehicle overloading and provide support to help partner countries perform sound economic analysis for deciding on the appropriate balance to be ensured between the maintenance and the expansion of their road network, taking into account all the relevant economic, social, environmental, financial, technical and operational criteria;
XIII osa
Part VIII
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 24/2012 „Euroopa Liidu solidaarsusfondi abi seoses 2009. aasta Abruzzo maavärinaga: tegevuse asjakohasus ja maksumus”