natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Underlines the need to ensure greater flexibility in the funding of the Common Security and Defence Policy's (CSDP) missions to guarantee the internal and external security of Union due to the danger posed by conflicts in countries which border it, as well as the heightened risk of possible terrorist activities connected to IS;
väljendab heameelt asjaolu üle, et valitsemisega seotud projektides on üldiselt saadud head tulemused, kuid on seisukohal, et projektide elluviimis- ja kontrollisüsteemid on nõrgad või ebatõhusad, kuivõrd kontrollikoda tuvastas olulisi puudujääke nelja puhul kaheksast auditeeritud valitsemisega seotud ühinemiseelse abi rahastamisvahendi projektist;
Urges the EEAS to maximise the benefits of economies of scale by creating new synergies within the EEAS headquarters and delegations as well as in cooperation with Member States and national diplomatic services, in the spirit of a true Union external policy and services; notes with satisfaction that the co-location of Union delegations and Member State diplomatic representations is increasing, even if it continues to be limited, and congratulates the EEAS for considering this matter as primordial in its action;
juhib tähelepanu, et õigussektori reform on alates 2007. aastast vähe edasi liikunud;
Accepts that there is still work to be done in relation to consular services;
rõhutab vajadust tugevdada rikkumisest teatajate kaitset, mida kirjeldati ajavahemiku 2013–2018 korruptsioonivastase võitluse riiklikus strateegias; nõuab, et Serbia ametiasutused kiirendaksid rikkumistest teatamist käsitlevate uute õigusaktide koostamist ning need õigusaktid peaksid sisendama usaldust ja ergutama võimalikke rikkumisest teatajaid tegutsema;
Part XVIII
toetab kontrollikoja soovitusi ning nõuab, et komisjon pööraks piisavat tähelepanu eesmärkide kindlaksmääramisele, vajaduste hindamisele ning varasematest projektidest õppimisele, samuti viivituste ning ebatõhusate või vähetulemuslike hankemenetluste vältimisele; rõhutab jätkusuutlikkuse tähtsust, sest tulemused tekitasid rea küsimusi kahe kolmandiku projektide, eriti valitsemisega seotud projektide puhul;
Special Report No 12/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Is the ERDF effective in funding projects that directly promote biodiversity under the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020?’
XXV osa
Points out that the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defines biodiversity as variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; points out, further, that the CBD recognises several major threats to biodiversity such as loss and fragmentation of habitats, overexploitation of forests, oceans, rivers, lakes and soils, pollution, climate change, and incoming species that compete with native flora and fauna;
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 20/2014 „Kas VKEdele e-kaubanduse valdkonnas antud ERFi toetus on olnud mõjus?”
Emphasises that biodiversity is essential for human life and for the wellbeing of societies; emphasises, furthermore, that climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the threats posed by invasive species and the overconsumption of natural resources are major challenges affecting every Union citizen;
tunneb heameelt kontrollikoja eriaruande nr 20/2014 üle ja ühineb selles esitatud järelduste ja soovitustega;
Regrets that the Union has been unable to meet its headline target of curbing biodiversity loss in the Union by 2010;
peab samuti kiiduväärseks komisjoni konstruktiivset reageerimist kontrollikoja soovitustele;
Notes that economically speaking, the loss of biodiversity is enormously costly to society and that not enough attention has yet been paid to this in global policies; notes, furthermore, that the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity study estimates that the cost of inaction and the deterioration of ecosystem services could amount to as much as 7 % of global GDP per year by 2050 [20];
märgib, et e-kaubanduse tehnoloogiad on väikeste ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtjate (VKE) arengu ja konkurentsivõime parandamise seisukohast üliolulised; toonitab, kui olulised on VKEd liidu majanduse arengu ja töökohtade loomise jaoks;
Is convinced that there is, therefore, an urgent need to act and attach greater political importance to biodiversity in order to meet the relevant commitments for 2020;
peab kiiduväärseks, et kontrollikoja eriaruandes rõhutatakse tulemuslikkuse mõõtmise ja Euroopa lisaväärtuse tähtsust;
Notes that project outcomes often take a long time to materialise, which makes the assessment of those outcomes difficult;
märgib, et kuigi internetipõhised äriteenused on muutunud kättesaadavamaks, olid investeerimiseks valitud projektid nõrgad; märgib, et taotluste võrdleva valikukorra ja projektitaotluste põhjaliku ärialase teabe puudumise tõttu rahastati enam kui kolmandikul juhtudest projekte, mis ei taganud kulutasuvust või tagasid seda vähesel määral;
Takes the view that despite the limitations relating to the low level of funding allocated to biodiversity and to the difficulties involved in assessing the way in which such funding is used, it is essential to maintain the funding at this stage;
juhib tähelepanu asjaolule, et 30st auditeeritud kaasrahastatud projektist kümme oleks ellu viidud ka siis, kui avaliku sektori kaasrahastamist ei oleks saadud, viis neist olid enne toetuse saamisest teatamist juba alanud ning kolme neist alustati üldse enne, kui ettevõte kaasrahastamistaotluse esitas;
Emphasises the fact that protecting biodiversity is not just a noble environmental aim, but that such a policy also has significant potential to create new skills, jobs and business opportunities;
on seisukohal, et kohustuslikuks tuleks muuta äriplaani esitamine, mis näitaks Euroopa lisaväärtust, et vältida tühimõju;
Emphasises the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation in the development, setting-up and financing of all other Union policies (including agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional development and cohesion, energy, industry, transport, tourism, development cooperation and aid, and research and development) so as to make Union sector-specific and budget policies more consistent and to ensure that the Union honours its binding commitments to protect biodiversity; points out, in this context, that cooperation between local, regional, national and Union authorities should be stepped up;
rõhutab, et liikmesriigid peaksid kehtestama valikukriteeriumid ja -menetlused, mille abil tagada, et valitud projektid annavad võimalikult palju lisaväärtust, aidates kaasa e-kaubanduse arengule VKEdes ja Euroopa digitaalse tegevuskava eesmärkide saavutamisele;
Notes that, despite the guidance and impetus provided by the Commission, it is for the Member States alone to set financing priorities in accordance with their own needs, and that the vast majority of Member States does not use the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as an instrument with which to protect biodiversity;
märgib, et komisjoni ebapiisava järelevalve tõttu oli võimatu hinnata, mil määral on Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi (ERF) toetus aidanud infotehnoloogia vallas kaasa riiklike ja liidu tasandi eesmärkide saavutamisele ning VKEde oma äriplaanide täitmisele;
Takes the view, therefore, that given the low take-up rate (0,79 %) there is a need to consider making it mandatory for a proportion of ERDF funding (percentage to be confirmed) to be earmarked for the promotion of biodiversity;
on veendunud, et komisjon peaks tagama liikmesriikidelt järjepideva ja usaldusväärse teabe saamise ERFist saadavate vahendite kasutamise kohta; on seisukohal, et sellest teabest peaksid nähtuma rakenduskavade edusammud ning seda mitte ainult rahanduslikust, vaid ka tulemuslikkuse seisukohast;
Part XIX
jagab kontrollikoja arvamust, et tulemuslikkuse hindamiseks tuleks toetuslepingutes kehtestada minimaalne arv usaldusväärseid näitajaid ja nendega seotud eesmärgid, mida hinnatakse ja mille täitmist jälgitakse nii siis, kui projekt on elluviidud ja toimiv, kui ka hiljem;
Special Report No 13/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti’
XXVI osa
Welcomes the Special Report No 13/2014 evaluating the Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti as an important contribution to the overall political debate about the Union's external humanitarian and development policies; takes note of the findings and recommendations;
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 21/2014 „ELi rahastatud investeeringud lennujaamade infrastruktuuri: kuludele vastav tulu jäi saamata”
Welcomes and takes note of the main conclusions and recommendations of the final report on the evaluation of the Union cooperation with the Republic of Haiti carried out by the Commission's Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development — EuropeAid at the request of the Parliament and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
tõdeb, et komisjon on juba viinud sisse muudatused, et lahendada paljud selles eriaruandes välja toodud küsimused, ning toetab täielikult komisjoni kirjeldatud uut reguleerivat raamistikku; teeb seda silmas pidades ettepaneku, et komisjon annaks aasta jooksul pärast selle resolutsiooni vastuvõtmist Euroopa Parlamendi eelarvekontrollikomisjonile aru edasimineku kohta nende soovituste elluviimisel;
General comments
toetab kontrollikoja soovitust, et liikmesriigid koostaksid lennujaamade väljaarendamiseks sidusad kavad, ning soovitab, et komisjon kiidaks need kavad heaks, enne kui konkreetseteks projektideks eraldatakse rahalised vahendid; soovitab ühtlasi võtta nendes piirkondlikes, üleriigilistes või riigiülestes kavades arvesse mitte ainult õhutransporti, vaid ka lennuaegadega sarnaste sõiduaegadega muid ühissõidukeid, sh ronge ja busse, et hoida ära turu küllastumine ning suurendada teenuste osutamise elujõulisust;
Reiterates the overall satisfaction with the work and efforts carried out by the Commission's services in response to the earthquake in Haiti in 2010 and this, in an extremely critical situation for the Union delegation and its staff; welcomes in this respect the Commission's ability to withhold payments and disbursements as a consequence to unsatisfactory progress in the Government's financial management and deficiencies in national public procurement procedures;
soovitab võimaldada rahastamist ainult majanduslikult elujõulistele lennujaamadele;
Regrets the weaknesses identified in the coordination between donors and within the Commission's services as also elaborated by an evaluation of the Union's cooperation with the Republic of Haiti (2008-2012) [21], which was issued on behalf of the Commission; calls, in this respect, for a better articulation of the humanitarian aid and development aid with a stronger link between relief, rehabilitation and development by means of a permanent LRRD (linking of relief, rehabilitation and development) framework; considers that integrated approaches with clearly stated coordination objectives and a coherent country strategy between the Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department (ECHO) and EuropeAid, alongside the sharing of best practices, have to be set up wherever possible; welcomes, in this respect, the inclusion of the systematic integration of the LRRD approach in the funding cycle covering the period 2014-20; calls furthermore on the Commission's services to improve the transition from short-term humanitarian activities to long-term development interventions and to develop a coherent coordination, not only among different Union actors but also with national priorities through a common strategy by means of a joint humanitarian and development framework; invites the Commission to enter into a dialogue with Parliament if an effective coordination among the various financial instruments in humanitarian and development aid is hindered by the existing legal framework; believes furthermore that the involvement of local civil society non-governmental organisations can strengthen the use of the local knowledge base in order to better identify rehabilitation needs and to supervise progress achieved by national authorities;
soovitab komisjonil vaadata kõik uued projektid läbi teeninduspiirkonna analüüsi arvestades, et tagada nende elujõulisus, võttes igal erijuhul arvesse piirkondlike lennujaamade tähtsust juurdepääsetavuse ja liikuvuse seisukohast liidus;
Recalls the recommendations in the aftermath of the visit by the delegation of Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control to Haiti in February 2012 and insists, as a constant principle, on the salient issue of traceability and accountability of Union development funds, in particular by linking budget support to performance, in particular with a clear definition of obligations and duties in the national administration to ensure adequate transparency, traceability and accountability; reiterates its call for putting more emphasis on the fight against endemic corruption; points out that humanitarian aid should be based on an exit strategy and stresses that funds should be channelled through the Haitian institutions whenever possible, within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement, in order to ensure ownership and to support the strengthening of the national organs, including the Procurement Agency, which should act as a control filter; invites the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to emphasise the conditionality matrix for sectorial budget support;
on seisukohal, et komisjon peaks esmajärjekorras jälgima tähelepanelikult liikmesriike, mille kohta on aruandes öeldud, et neil on minevikus olnud eriti probleemseid projekte;
Recalls that ‘State building’ is at the centre of the Union development strategy and the cornerstone of any such crisis situation, in line with the principles for intervention in fragile contexts; notes that this includes supporting institutional building, the transparency and efficiency of public financial management, budgetary allocations and effectiveness of public expenditure, with reinforced political and policy dialogues;
teeb presidendile ülesandeks edastada käesolev resolutsioon nõukogule, komisjonile, Euroopa Liidu Kohtule ja kontrollikojale ning korraldada selle avaldamine Euroopa Liidu Teatajas (L-seerias).
Calls for the definition of a good policy mix in the logic of the Union intervention through a comprehensive approach to state and non-state/non-governmental stakeholders and to the sectors support to be provided through rapid sectorial needs assessment and this, to the benefit of the viability, complementarity and sustainability of projects;
ELT L 66, 8.3.2013.
Orientations for the future
ELT C 403, 13.11.2014, lk 1.
Considers that beyond the Haitian situation, measures need to be discussed and improved in order to strengthen the policy framework of intervention and disaster risk reduction with the ultimate purpose of limiting the risk for human lives and their human living conditions to a minimum; believes that investment in disaster risk reduction is crucial as a full component of sustainable development, as well as highly cost-effective, as it allows for a significantly more efficient and effective use of resources than paying the bill for disaster response;
ELT C 398, 12.11.2014, lk 1.
Considers that situations of crisis and fragility require the development of policies which call for new approaches, new methods and expertise, particularly concerning activities such as (i) identifying risks at different operational levels, (ii) making scenario and projections of likely consequences and (iii) designing instruments to avoid, reduce and prepare for risks and potential disaster; calls for a flexible approach in order to allow the Commission to adapt its measures and instruments for assistance adequately and rapidly to a crisis and post-crisis situation; notes in this context that in the meantime the Commission has set up a system to mobilise experts in various fields of competence in order to allow at short notice the deployment of additional staff to Union delegations or headquarter services in the case of staff shortage;
ELT C 403, 13.11.2014, lk 128.
Encourages the Commission and the EEAS to work systematically on the four phases of the disaster management cycle namely mitigation and preparedness, response and recovery towards the definition of strategic framework for disaster risk management and resilience-building; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to inform Parliament about the developments in particular with regard to risk management and the preparedness to implement and achieve programme objectives in a post-disaster context;
Vastuvõetud tekstid, P8_TA(2015)0118 (vt käesoleva Euroopa Liidu Teataja lk 25).
Recalls that in the circumstances of any such crisis, due care has to be attributed to the soundness and operational effectiveness of the national governance framework for managing disaster risk reduction as a pre-condition for the success of the Union intervention; recalls that the assessment of any national governance framework should take into account, inter alia, the existing accountability frameworks for outcomes, the existing definition and decision of responsibilities at central and local levels, a clear chain of commands and controls, information channels among various actors/donors alongside with feedback mechanisms on projects;
EÜT L 248, 16.9.2002, lk 1.
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendations with regard to Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti and welcomes the Commission's response to also accept the recommendations;
ELT L 298, 26.10.2012, lk 1.
Part XX
Nõukogu 15. juuli 2003. aasta määrus (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1287/2003 rahvamajanduse kogutulu ühtlustamise kohta turuhindades (rahvamajanduse kogutulu määrus) (ELT L 181, 19.7.2003, lk 1).
Special Report No 14/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’
Nõukogu 22. mai 2000. aasta määrus (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1150/2000, millega rakendatakse ühenduste omavahendite süsteemi käsitlev otsus 94/728/EÜ, Euratom (EÜT L 130, 31.5.2000, lk 1).
Believes that all Union institutions and bodies should aim at a common approach to their greenhouse gas emissions and their possible reduction; considers that in order to achieve this they need to comprehensively calculate their greenhouse gas emissions and should not refrain from publishing their results;
Euroopa Parlamendi 3. aprilli 2014. aasta resolutsioon tähelepanekutega, mis on Euroopa Liidu 2012. aasta üldeelarve (III jagu – komisjon ja rakendusametid) täitmisele heakskiidu andmist käsitlevate otsuste lahutamatu osa (ELT L 266, 5.9.2014, lk 32).
Believes that the Commission, in order to maintain its reliability in environmental negotiations with third parties, should put more effort in collecting more data on its own greenhouse gas emissions;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 21. mai 2013. aasta määrus (EL) nr 525/2013 kasvuhoonegaaside heite seire- ja aruandlusmehhanismi ning kliimamuutusi käsitleva muu olulise siseriikliku ja liidu teabe esitamise kohta ning otsuse nr 280/2004/EÜ kehtetuks tunnistamise kohta (ELT L 165, 18.6.2013, lk 13).
Invites those Union institutions and bodies who have no Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) certificate to consider applying it promptly; emphasises, however, that EMAS should be considered as a tool to structure, inter alia, greenhouse gas emissions and should not be considered as the sole ultimate goal of the green policy of the institutions;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 17. detsembri 2013. aasta määrus (EL) nr 1301/2013, mis käsitleb Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fondi ja majanduskasvu ja tööhõivesse investeerimise eesmärgiga seonduvaid erisätteid ning millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks määrus (EÜ) nr 1080/2006 (ELT L 347, 20.12.2013, lk 289).
Points out that offsetting greenhouse gas emissions can be used by the Union institutions and bodies to a greater degree to reduce their carbon footprint; agrees with the Court of Auditors that using high-quality offsets in addition to emission reduction measures (and not instead of such reduction measures) would address these issues appropriately; notes however that offsetting should come second to investing these funds to further improvement of environmental policy of the Union institutions and bodies;
Komisjoni 23. detsembri 2002. aasta määrus (EÜ, Euratom) nr 2342/2002, millega kehtestatakse Euroopa ühenduste üldeelarve suhtes kohaldatavat finantsmäärust käsitleva nõukogu määruse (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1605/2002 üksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad (EÜT L 357, 31.12.2002, lk 1).
Welcomes the fact that some of the Union institutions have started pilot projects of green procurement; hopes that the results prove to be promising and that green procurement will become a standard procedure of the Union institutions and bodies in the future;
Komisjoni 29. oktoobri 2012. aasta delegeeritud määrus (EL) nr 1268/2012, mis käsitleb Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EL, Euratom) nr 966/2012 (mis käsitleb Euroopa Liidu üldeelarve suhtes kohaldatavaid finantseeskirju) kohaldamise eeskirju (ELT L 362, 31.12.2012, lk 1).
Stresses that in the implementation of these policies, human factors remain a key aspect; urges therefore the management in the Union institutions and bodies responsible for these policies to train and improve further their skills and understanding of the importance of the greenhouse gas emissions of the institutions; hopes that the establishment of the new College of Commissioners in 2014 provides an opportunity of a new opening in implementation of higher standards in the Commission and its agencies;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 23. oktoobri 2000. aasta direktiiv 2000/60/EÜ, millega kehtestatakse ühenduse veepoliitika alane tegevusraamistik (EÜT L 327, 22.12.2000, lk 1).
Part XXI
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 23. aprilli 2009. aasta direktiiv 2009/28/EÜ taastuvatest energiaallikatest toodetud energia kasutamise edendamise kohta ning direktiivide 2001/77/EÜ ja 2003/30/EÜ muutmise ja hilisema kehtetuks tunnistamise kohta (ELT L 140, 5.6.2009, lk 16).
Special Report No 15/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’
Nõukogu 19. jaanuari 2009. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 73/2009, millega kehtestatakse ühise põllumajanduspoliitika raames põllumajandustootjate suhtes kohaldatavate otsetoetuskavade ühiseeskirjad ja teatavad toetuskavad põllumajandustootjate jaoks, muudetakse määruseid (EÜ) nr 1290/2005, (EÜ) nr 247/2006, (EÜ) nr 378/2007 ning tunnistatakse kehtetuks määrus (EÜ) nr 1782/2003 (ELT L 30, 31.1.2009, lk 16).
Notes with concern that the strategic objectives of the External Borders Fund (EBF) have not been clear, and that, in particular, there is tension between the general nature of the EBF as solidarity mechanism and its concentration on concrete objectives for better cooperation in the field of border controls and visas;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 17. detsembri 2013. aasta määrus (EL) nr 1308/2013, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandustoodete ühine turukorraldus ning millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks nõukogu määrused (EMÜ) nr 922/72, (EMÜ) nr 234/79, (EÜ) nr 1037/2001 ja (EÜ) nr 1234/2007 (ELT L 347, 20.12.2013, lk 671).
Notes that for the Commission the successful launch of SIS II, VIS and Eurosur in all Member States indicates the contribution of the EBF; is of the opinion, however, that such a general statement can never be used as a satisfactory reply to the Court of Auditors' specific criticisms of lacking performance indicators;
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 17. juuni 2008. aasta direktiiv 2008/56/EÜ, millega kehtestatakse ühenduse merekeskkonnapoliitika-alane tegevusraamistik (merestrateegia raamdirektiiv) (ELT L 164, 25.6.2008, lk 19).