natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Emphasises the fact that priority should be given to redevelopment that gives the opportunity for economic activities, such as job creation, and believes that the end use concept should be the core point in Union spending; underlines that the brownfields should be regenerated, and the use of greenfields should be considered as the last option only when dire economic necessities prevail;
tõdeb, et ajavahemikul 2007–2013 sai Egiptus liidu toetust umbes 1000 miljoni euro suuruses summas: 60 % valdkondliku eelarvetoetuse kaudu Egiptuse valitsusele ja ülejäänud Egiptuse valitsusega kokkulepitud projektide kaudu; märgib, et eelarvetoetus on komisjoni jaoks peamine Egiptusele abi andmise mehhanism; teeb siiski järelduse, et Euroopa välisteenistus ja komisjon ei ole suutnud Egiptuse valitsemise parandamiseks antavat liidu toetust tulemuslikult juhtida ja kontrollida;
Stresses the need for reliable data for the purposes of ensuring effectiveness and performance assessment, and calls on the Commission to take steps that such data are collected (inventory, level of contamination, etc.); invites Member States to develop inventories of brownfields and to assemble data on each brownfield’s condition (level of contamination), thus allowing for prioritising of Union funding;
märgib, et Morsi valitsuse ajal sai kriminaaltulu jälitamine esmatähtsaks ning et see on toonud kaasa olulisi edusamme; võtab teadmiseks, et kriminaaltulu jälitamine nõuab kõrgetasemelisi rahvusvahelistele standarditele vastavaid õigusalaseid jõupingutusi, mis toob seega kaasa menetluste ja rahanduse juhtimise parandamise; võtab teadmiseks, et Egiptus on korruptsiooni tajumise tabelis endiselt madalal kohal, kuid jõupingutused ei ole olnud asjatud ning edusammud on nähtavad; märgib, et liidu abiga on hiljuti valminud tunnistajate kaitset käsitleva seaduse eelnõu ning nimetatud seadus koos kahe teise seadusega, mis puudutavad huvide konflikti ja dokumentidele juurdepääsu, on vastuvõtmiseks valmis;
Calls on the Commission and the Members States to apply a reimbursement clause in each grant agreement; believes that the reimbursement clause should take into account a long term/life cycle approach, and that reassessment should take account of a 15 years period, when a regeneration project should mature and generate revenue;
EL ja Ameerika Ühendriikide rahvusvahelise arengu amet (USAID) on riigi rahanduse juhtimise valdkonna abiandjatest koordinaatorid Egiptuses; märgib, et EL koordineerib ka Egiptuse ja liikmesriikide vahelist koostööd kriminaaltulu jälitamise valdkonnas ning et ülemaailmselt on külmutatud 1,2 miljardi euro väärtuses varasid;
Regrets that while authorities are aware of the polluter pays principle, in none of the audited cases did the polluter bear the full cost of decontamination; acknowledges that applying the polluter pays principle in practice is a difficult challenge; invites Member States, nevertheless, to take measures to overcome any difficulties in identifying the polluter and urges the Commission to require implementation of polluter pays principle as condition for granting Union funding;
leiab, et programmide järelevalve valdkondliku eelarvetoetuse kaudu on oluline ning et sama oluline on nõuda Egiptuse ametiasutustega peetavas dialoogis rahvusvahelise riiklike kulutuste ja finantsaruandluse puhul järjepidevalt aruandluse ja läbipaistvuse parandamist; on arvamusel, et valdkondliku eelarvetoetuse programmide lõpetamise võimalus on selle eesmärgi aspektist kasulik ja vajalik vahend;
Welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a Soil Framework Directive (COM(2006) 232), which comprises provisions addressing a number of issues identified by the Court of Auditors and its recommendations and urges the Council to support the Commission’s proposal;
Järeldused
Part XIII
märgib, et see eriaruanne ELi ja Egiptuse valitsemistava alase koostöö kohta sisaldab mitmeid olulisi tähelepanekuid ning on oluline, et kontrollikoda ei hinda vaid rahanduse juhtimise kvaliteeti, vaid vaatab läbi ka liidu programmidega saavutatud tulemused; kutsub seetõttu komisjoni üles saavutatud tulemusi korrapäraselt hindama;
Special Report No 24/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: The relevance and cost of operations’
märgib, et Euroopa Parlament peab investeerima rohkem oma poliitilisse kohustusse jälgida tähelepanelikult sedalaadi ja muude poliitikameetmete rakendamist;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report 24/2012 [20], despite the delay of more than one year; notes that with this report, a Union institution finally provides Parliament and Union taxpayers with answers to some of the questions regarding the management of Union funds in the Abruzzi region after the 2009 earthquake;
XIX osa
Congratulates the Court of Auditors for safeguarding the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 [21]) concerning the type of shelter that can be provided under the Regulation;
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 5/2013 „Kas ELi ühtekuuluvuspoliitika vahendeid on maanteedele kasutatud asjakohaselt?”
Totally agrees with the statement from the Court of Auditors that ‘around 30 % (EUR 144 million) of the EUSF contributions was earmarked for operations which were fully eligible under the EUSF Regulation; however, the CASE project (Italian acronym for ‘Complessi Antisisminici Sostenibili Ecocompatibiliti’, i.e. seismically isolated and environmentally sustainable housing), while relevant to the actual needs, did not comply with specific provisions of the EUSF Regulation; this was because it constructed new permanent buildings instead of temporary houses; the CASE project took 70 % of the funding — EUR 350 million; the strategy chosen for CASE project addressed the housing needs of 15.000 of the earthquake-affected population, but did not respond in a timely manner and with sufficient capacity to the actual needs of the population; the CASDE houses were more expensive than standard houses’ [22]; notes that this was explained by emergency conditions;
tervitab kontrollikoja järeldusi, mis kinnitavad liiklusohutuse märkimisväärset paranemist ja suremuskordaja olulist vähenemist (mõnel juhul kuni nulli surmajuhtumini); märgib, et lisaks on teede parandamine kaasa toonud sõiduaegade üldise vähenemise;
Notes that the Decree of the Prefect Gabrielli, 1462, 3 April 2012, confirms the assessment of the Court of Auditors, hence the decree, which transfers the CASE properties of the City of Aquila, defines C.A.S.E in Article 1 as ‘housing units intended for permanent use’ [23];
võtab teadmiseks kontrollikoja soovitused, aktsepteerides samas mitmeid selgitusi, mida on andnud komisjon;
Takes note of the irregularities detected by the Commission in its 2012 audit report; regrets that the Commission’s preliminary audit report is confidential, which means that Union citizens do not have access to the information about how their tax money has been used; takes note that the final Italian version of the report can be disclosed under the usual rules to protect personal data;
märgib, et kuigi maanteeprojektidele seati eesmärgid, ei saanud nende mõju majanduslikule arengule hinnata, kuna puudusid asjakohased näitajad; kutsub komisjoni ja liikmesriike üles selle küsimuse lahendamiseks kehtestama seoses uue programmiperioodiga usaldusväärse ja mõõdetava näitajate komplekti;
Calls on the Commission to clarify why i) although alerted to the inquiries by Aquila’s prosecutor, the Commission has always refused to investigate whether or not Union funds have been paid out to economic operators linked to criminal organisations; ii) although the Commission was alerted to the fact that there could be problems with the cost of the CASE project, the Commission did not follow-up on this point;
märgib, et auditeeritud liikmesriikide riigihankemenetlustes esineb siiski erinevusi; on seisukohal, et Euroopa riigihangete direktiivi tuleks kohaldada rangelt kõikides liikmesriikides, et saavutada kõrgeim tasuvuse ja tõhususe tase; leiab ka, et tulevikus peaks teeprojektide kaasrahastamine sõltuma liikmesriikide võetud meetmetest eesmärgiga tagada konkurents ehitusturgudel, keskendudes majanduslikult kõige soodsamaid pakkumusi väljavalivatele hankesüsteemidele ja vältides samas turgudele sisenemise tõkkeid;
Notes that more than 42 % of CASE has been built by using Union taxpayers’ money;
kutsub komisjoni üles jätkama kõigi projektide kohta kehtiva investeerimisprojektide tasuvusanalüüsi ajakohastamist ja muutmist ning juhiste jagamist liiklusprognooside korraldamiseks;
Regrets that Parliament is still waiting to be informed by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) as to whether or not any irregularities were found to have taken place and if a further follow-up was required;
palub komisjonil hõlbustada parimate tavade vahetamist liikmesriikide vahel seoses ühelt poolt usaldusväärsete liiklusprognooside kehtestamise ning teiselt poolt teedeehituse võimaliku majandusliku mõju arvutamisega;
Is concerned by the fact that eight individuals have been taken into custody by the Italian police, and are currently under suspicion of manipulating building licenses for the reconstruction works that are taking place in the Abruzzi region and in the city of L’Aquila; asks the Commission to monitor the development thereof and to report to Parliament on these developments including the criminal cases;
on arvamusel, et teedeehituse kulud sõltuvad ka maapinna morfoloogiast, seismilisest ohust, keskkonna-, arheoloogia- ja kultuurialastest ning muudest piirangutest, samuti vajaminevate tehniliste objektide (näiteks sillad, tunnelid) arvust; leiab, et neid muutujaid tuleks kontrollikoja auditis nõuetekohaselt arvesse võtta;
Welcomes the discussions relating to the revision of the EUSF Regulation, picking up ‘lessons learned’ in the Abruzzi earthquake;
palub komisjonil ja kontrollikojal esitada rohkem teavet võimaluse kohta kehtestada kogu liidus kehtiv teave ühikuhinna kohta inseneride jaoks, kes koostavad uute projektide jaoks hinnanguid, eesmärgiga aidata abisaajatel vähendada hankekulusid;
Part XIV
XX osa
Special Report No 25/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers?’
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 6/2013 „Kas liikmesriigid ja komisjon saavutasid maamajanduse mitmekesistamise meetmetega kulutustele vastavat tulu?”
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report ‘Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers?’, and makes the following comments in relation to its recommendations;
Üldised tähelepanekud
Welcomes the fact that some issues raised by the Court of Auditors, including a stronger emphasis on performance, have been addressed in the Commission’s proposed regulations for the new programming period 2014–2020 and encourages Member States to support the line taken by the Commission;
väljendab muret selle pärast, et liidu rahastatavate programmide hea haldamine ning algatused on ohus, kui avaliku sektori kärped mõjutavad töötajate arvu asjaomastes asutustes;
Emphasises the fact that while minimising error rate is vitally important, this is sometimes detrimental to the overall performance of a programme or project; notes that paying increasing attention to regularity and legality, rather than encouraging better performance, leads to less innovative uses of the European Social Fund (ESF);
tunneb muret, et liikmesriigid rakendavad meetmeid erineval viisil ning et kontrollikoja märkused on paljudel juhtudel neile suunatud;
Notes that the increased emphasis on performance and results does not translate into willingness on the part of Member States to contribute to a performance reserve, which is not a suitable solution during this period of economic uncertainty;
juhib tähelepanu sellele, et rõhku tuleks panna selgetele vajadustele või konkreetsetele eesmärkidele ning abi osutamise võimele seda kõige rohkem vajavates valdkondades;
Invites the Member States to design their Operational Programmes in such a way that the performance of the ESF can be measured, in particular, to set quantified operational goals and indicators to measure outputs, results and specific impacts, and to set intermediate milestones, as well as to establish a hierarchy of target values, and to incorporate the Operational Programme’s result and specific impact goals at project level, thus enabling payments to be linked to performance;
juhib tähelepanu vajadusele keskkonnahoidlikuma, õiglasema ja täielikult õiguspärase ühise põllumajanduspoliitika järele, mis esindaks avalikeks hüvedeks tehtavate riiklike kulutuste põhimõtet; usub, et vahendite sotsiaal-poliitilise kasutamise suurendamine maaelu arenguks annab tõuke majanduskasvule ja töökohtade loomisele maapiirkondades;
Invites the Member States to design their monitoring and evaluation systems in such a way that the progress towards all target values set can be measured in a timely and understandable way and at appropriate intervals, thereby allowing corrective actions to be taken and lessons learned for future decision-making, and to ensure timely collection of relevant and verifiable data, on-going evaluations, and the measurement of the net employment effect of the ESF actions aimed at increasing employment;
juhib tähelepanu sellele, et projektide asjakohase mitmekesistamise eesmärk peaks olema kohaliku infrastruktuuri ja kohalike põhiteenuste arendamine maapiirkondades, et hoida ära rahvaarvu vähenemise suundumust; leiab, et projektide eesmärk peaks olema ka muuta maapiirkonnad noortele ligitõmbavamaks ning luua uusi korralikke ja hästi tasustatud töökohti;
Calls on the Commission to promote these recommendations when negotiating Operational Programmes; calls on the Commission to provide appropriate data on the means mobilised and the results achieved by the ESF to ensure the submission of consistent and reliable information by Member States, inter alia, by issuing common indicators to be included by Member States in their Operational Programmes; calls on the Commission to analyse in depth performance issues when assessing the management and control systems;
Kontrollikoja lähenemisviis
Part XV
võtab teadmiseks, et selles eriaruandes keskenduti mitmekesistamise eesmärgile kolmanda põhisuuna raames, ning leiab, et kasuks tuleks ka maapiirkondades elukvaliteedi parandamise ning majandustegevuse mitmekesistamise eesmärgi uurimine;
Special Report No 1/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘- Has the EU support to the food-processing industry been effective and efficient in adding value to agricultural products?’
märgib, et auditeeritud meetmete eesmärk on avaldada suuremat mõju kui tööhõive ja sissetulek ning need on kavandatud maapiirkondade jätkusuutlikkusele kaasaaitamiseks;
Takes note of the Court of Auditors’ Special Report ‘Has the EU support to the food-processing industry been effective and efficient in adding value to agricultural products?’, and its recommendations;
Arenguperspektiivid
Is concerned about the considerable number of shortcomings found by the Court of Auditors at the time of audit, in particular, that the design and the programming of the measure makes it difficult for Member States to avoid risks and ensure effectiveness and efficiency when selecting the individual projects for support and the monitoring and evaluation arrangements do not collect information on added value or on the effects on competitiveness of agriculture; observes that as a result, there is not a satisfactory basis for monitoring and evaluation, and for accountability;
väljendab heameelt asjaolu üle, et komisjon tegi järgmiseks programmiperioodiks mitmeid parandusettepanekuid, mis peaksid käsitlema mitmeid kontrollikojale muret tegevaid punkte, eelkõige järgmist:
Regrets that limiting the rules to a minimum and simplification has resulted in a measure with a highly questionable added value; namely that the legislation itself does not specify what the added value is intended to be, nor to whom such added value should accrue;
a. tugevam õigusraamistik täieliku strateegia kirjeldamise ja eelhindamisega;
Believes that the current level of flexibility is excessive, as the measure has lost its focus and has become a general subsidy, risking becoming a handout to the food-processing companies;
b. kolme meetme asemel üks meede, millega kaasneks parem keskendumine, selgemad abikõlblikkuse tingimused (koos juhistega) ja makse-eeskirjad ning lihtsustatud kulude kasutamine;
Notes with concern that out of 24 projects audited by the Court of Auditors, only six had a clear effect in adding value and that these were classified as ‘high added value’, while further 12 projects were assessed as medium by the Court of Auditors and the remaining six projects resulted in little or no adding of value to the agricultural products;
c. nende valikukriteeriumide parem määratlemine, mille kasutamine peaks olema kohustuslik;
Believes that Member States should clearly identify in their Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) where and why public intervention is necessary to improve the added value of agricultural produce and the competitiveness of agriculture; believes that the RDPs should set specific and measurable objectives in relation to these needs; urges the Commission to approve only those RDPs that present substantiated and comprehensive strategies with a clear rationale to demonstrate how the financial support for the food industry will improve the competitiveness of agriculture;
d. parimate tavade vahetamine tühimõju ja tegevuse ümberpaigutamise vähendamise osas;
Invites Member States to define and apply criteria that ensure the selection of effective, sustainable projects with respect to Member States’ specific objectives; calls on the Commission to ensure that these criteria are correctly and continuously applied and welcomes the Commission’s proposal for the next programming period stipulating that selection criteria should be defined for operations under all measures;
e. tulemusnäitajad kui maaelu arengukava hindamise osa;
Reiterates the belief that the Commission and Member States should promote the adoption of best practices in respect of the mitigation of deadweight and displacement risks; invites Member States to consider deadweight and displacement risks, both when drawing up their RDP and in project selection, and to target the aid to projects for which there is a demonstrable need for public support and which deliver added value; requests that the Commission report back to the discharge authority on the progress made as regards exchange of best practices on the mitigation of deadweight and displacement risks with Member States;
f. ühine järelevalve- ja hindamisraamistik ühiselt määratletud tulemusnäitajate hindamiseks;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation that in the new programming period, the Commission should improve the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) in a way that it provides useful information on the achievements of the projects and measures financed by means of enhancement of on-going evaluation activities; believes that current methodology, using lengthy mid-term evaluation reports, has proven to be inadequate;
palub liikmesriikidel oma maaelu arengukavades selgelt välja tuua, kas riiklik sekkumine mittepõllumajanduslikule tegevusele suunatud investeeringutesse aitab leevendada näiteks turutõrkeid, mis on seotud takistustega tööhõives ja majanduskasvus; usub, et seejärel peaksid liikmesriigid määrama konkreetsed ja mõõdetavad eesmärgid seoses asjaomaste vajadustega ning et komisjon peaks heaks kiitma vaid need maaelu arengukavad, milles on esitatud põhjendatud ja kõikehõlmav strateegia koos selge arutluskäiguga, kuidas poliitikameede aitab saavutada majanduskasvu tingimuste ja tööhõivevõimaluste loomise strateegilisi eesmärke ning võidelda elanike arvu vähenemisega maapiirkondades;
Welcomes the Commission’s proposals for the monitoring and evaluation system for the period 2014–2020, replacing the requirement of a mid-term evaluation by extended annual implementation reports (in 2017 and 2019), which are to assess progress towards achieving the objectives of the programme, and the provision that Member States should carry out evaluations during the programming period according to an evaluation plan; reminds the Commission that collecting detailed data at measure level is indispensable for enabling the CMEF to provide details as to the success of the measures;
palub liikmesriikidel kehtestada kriteeriumid, mis tagaksid liikmesriikide konkreetseid eesmärke arvesse võttes kõige mõjusamate ja jätkusuutlikumate projektide väljavalimise, ning neid kriteeriume järjekindlalt rakendama; leiab, et komisjon peaks tagama nende kriteeriumide nõuetekohase ja järjepideva rakendamise mis tahes ajal, mitte ainult eelarvepuudujäägi korral;
Part XVI
palub komisjonil ja liikmesriikidel vahetada ja edendada parimate tavade kasutuselevõtmist, millega vähendada tühimõju ja tegevuse ümberpaiknemise ohtu;
Special Report No 2/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled - ‘Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?’
palub komisjonil julgustada liikmesriike järgima tava, mille kohaselt on investeerimiskulud abikõlblikud alles toetuse heakskiitmise kuupäevast alates;
Simplification
palub komisjonil tagada, et liikmesriikidel oleksid mõjusad süsteemid kulutuste põhjendatuse kontrollimiseks;
Agrees with the overall evaluation of the Court of Auditors that ‘the Commission has taken a number of steps to simplify the rules for participation’ by introducing a number of administrative and financial simplifications to FP7 rules for participation which reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries and facilitate their access to the programme; believes, however, that the periods could be further shortened based on improved internal communication and the sharing of best practices among DGs, as well as the timely introduction of effective new IT tools;
kutsub komisjoni ja liikmesriike üles suurendama oma jõupingutusi selle nimel, et halduskoormus väheneks ja maksed tehtaks mõistliku aja jooksul;
Welcomes the increased application of flat rates on direct and indirect costs, including the introduction of average personnel costs; emphasises, at the same time, the need for continued efforts towards the standardisation of reimbursement practices;
palub komisjonil ja liikmesriikidel tagada tulevaseks programmitöö perioodiks 2014–2020 asjakohase ja usaldusväärse teabe laekumise, mis hõlbustaks meetmete haldamist ja järelevalvet ning näitaks, mil määral aitab eraldatud toetus saavutada liidu üldisi prioriteete; leiab, et töökohtade loomise eesmärgid peaksid olema realistlikud ja loodud töökohtade arvu tuleks täpselt jälgida; leiab, et meetmeid tuleks paremini hallata kogu programmitöö perioodi vältel ja ennekõike siis, kui ilmneb, et seatud eesmärke ei saavutata;
Expresses its concerns about the unsuccessful efforts to establish a certification mechanism for the approval of cost methodologies that would give assurance to the beneficiaries on their methodologies; considers that the wide-spread implementation of flat rate on indirect costs in Horizon 2020 will contribute further to preventing possible financial abuses and decreasing the error rates, thereby benefiting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), thus making the participation of potential beneficiaries from the new EU-12 Member States easier;
XXI osa