natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Strongly supports the opening of fully fledged Union delegations in all the countries of Central Asia as a means of increasing the presence and visibility of the Union in the region and long-term cooperation and engagement with all sectors of society and of fostering progress towards better understanding and the emergence of the rule of law and respect for human rights; considers that the presence of such delegations will greatly contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the development assistance;
väljendab tõsist muret selle pärast, et komisjon ei ole asjakohaselt hinnanud kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepete kogu majanduslikku mõju ning ka asjaolu, et tulu täielik sissenõudmine ei ole tagatud;
Calls on the Commission to set up a system for calculating and reporting on the overall administrative cost involved in delivering its development assistance;
tuletab meelde, kui oluline on teavitada poliitikuid, eri sidusrühmi ja liidu maksumaksjaid asjakohaselt eri kaubanduspoliitiliste valikute ja stsenaariumide peamisest lisaväärtusest ja puudustest;
Requests that the Commission define and apply robust and objectively verifiable conditions for any continuing budget support programmes, in particular giving sufficient attention to support for anti-corruption mechanisms;
peab vastuvõetamatuks, et mõnel juhul ei ole tehtud jätkusuutlikkuse mõjuhindamisi või ei ole need täielikud või põhinevad aegunud või vananenud teabel või avaldati mõnel juhul (Tšiili) alles pärast kokkuleppele all kirjutamist;
Recalls that corruption is a serious problem in Central Asian countries; points out that in Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index, all Central Asian countries were rated at less than 28 out of 100 in 2011, with Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan in the bottom 10 % of the 182 countries surveyed;
rõhutab, et enne igale uuele kokkuleppele alla kirjutamist tuleks selle aluseks olev jätkusuutlikkuse mõjuhindamine lõpule viia ja avalikustada;
Considers that such pervasive corruption may affect the Commission's reputation and reduce the effectiveness of the support programmes;
väljendab kahetsust selle üle, et üldise soodustuste süsteemi partnerriigid ei ole mitte iga kord kirjutanud alla inimõiguste ja töötajate õiguste rahvusvahelistele konventsioonidele; kutsub komisjoni üles panema kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepetes suuremat rõhku keskkonnale ja heale juhtimistavale;
Is of the opinion that disbursement decisions should be based on progress achieved by partner countries rather than on their commitments to reform; underlines the importance of ensuring an appropriate policy dialogue based on an incentive-based approach and a continuous monitoring of sector reforms and programmes measuring performance and the sustainability of the results;
soovib teada, milliseid meetmeid on komisjon 2015. aasta oktoobriks Euroopa Parlamendi ja kontrollikoja soovituste ja tähelepanekute põhjal võtnud;
Calls for greater transparency in the allocation of funds by Union and Member States' embassies to support genuinely independent non-governmental partners so as to help them play an effective role in the development and consolidation of civil society;
on arvamusel, et selleks et parandada kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepete majandusliku mõju hindamist, peaks komisjon
Requests that the Commission improve the programme design and delivery in light of lessons learnt and changing circumstances;
tegema kõikide kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepete mõjuhindamise ja jätkusuutlikkuse mõjuhinnangu, mis võimaldaks soovitud majandusliku mõju põhjalikku, terviklikku ja kvantifitseeritud analüüsi, sh saamatajäänud tulu täpset hindamist;
Asks the Commission to report on results and impact in a way that allows comparison with plans and objectives;
kaasama Eurostati jätkusuutlikkuse mõju hindamisel kasutatavate statistiliste andmeallikate kvaliteedi tavapärasesse hindamisse ning tagama, et läbirääkijatele mõeldud analüüsid tehakse õigeaegselt;
Part III
tegema kõikide kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepete puhul vahe- ja järelhindamised, et hinnata, millises ulatuses täidab olulise mõjuga kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepe oma poliitikaeesmärgi ning kuidas parandada selle tulemuslikkust peamistes majandussektorites, mis sisaldab ka hinnangut saamatajäänud tulu kohta;
Special Report No 15/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Has the Environment component of the LIFE programme been effective?’
kutsub komisjoni üles tegema liidu finantshuvide paremaks kaitsmiseks järgmist:
Highlights the need for the LIFE Programme to act as a catalyst for changes in policy development and implementation; stresses the need for the Commission to set clear, specific, measurable and achievable objectives for projects to be funded;
looma kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepete kohta liidu riskiprofiilid, et liikmesriigid kasutaksid riskianalüüsiks ühesugust lähenemist, millega vähendatakse kahju liidu eelarvele;
Emphasises the need for projects financed by the LIFE Programme to contribute to the achievement of the specific objectives of more than one of the Programme's priority areas; underlines the need of the funded projects to avoid isolation and on the contrary to encompass transnational character, and to contribute in a measurable fashion to dissemination, sustainability and replication of their output across other Member States;
kontrollima, kas liikmesriigid muudavad oma riskihaldussüsteemid ja kontrollistrateegia mõjusamaks, et vähendada kahju liidu eelarvele;
Notes that selection of the best projects can sometimes be distorted by the national allocations; encourages the Member States to keep a geographical balance by proposing more integrated projects, but reiterates that the funds should be first of all distributed based on the merits of the projects and not in a manner detrimental to the quality of the projects;
kannustama liikmesriike võtma vastastikuse abi teatiste saamisel asjakohaseid ettevaatusabinõusid;
Notes that particular attention should be paid to potential of projects to be disseminated, sustained and replicated; calls on the Commission to set clear indicators assessing dissemination, sustainability and replication potential of assessed projects in order to achieve the programme's objectives; encourages the Commission to follow up on these objectives;
tegema riskipõhiseid hindamisi ja kontrollkülastusi soodustusi saavates riikides, eriti seoses päritolu ja kumuleerimise eeskirjadega;
Calls on the Commission to improve its programme management tools in order to avoid non-transparent selection procedures; considers that this includes improvement of the project selection evaluation forms, introducing detailed templates for assessments of the claimed costs, appropriate project monitoring, introducing adequate common output and result indicators, and thorough follow-up of project monitoring;
kohustama liikmesriike parandama halduskoostööalase teabe kvaliteeti;
Part IV
parandama Euroopa Pettustevastase Ameti (OLAF) uurimiste rahanduslikke järelmeetmeid, et hoida ära aegumisest tulenev kahju ELi eelarvele;
Special Report No 16/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Taking stock of “single audit” and the Commission's reliance on the work of national audit authorities in cohesion’
tugevdama liidu positsiooni vastastikuse kaubanduse sooduskorra kokkulepete puhul ning kasutama rohkem ettevaatusabinõusid ja kaitsemeetmeid, lisades need kõikidesse tulevastesse kaubanduslepetesse;
Emphasises the potential efficiency gains from a single audit chain based on common principles and standards; encourages the Member States, the Commission and the Court of Auditors to continue their efforts in this respect; considers that such a single audit system should also take account of multiannual programme cycles;
andma viivitamata ülevaate ajavahemikul 2010–2014 saadud tagasimaksetest;
Reminds the Commission of Parliament's remarks [10] concerning the Court of Auditors' findings in its 2012 Annual Report: ‘[s]tresses that the findings of the Court of Auditors' audit indicate weaknesses in the “first-level checks” on expenditure [in Member States]; observes that, for 56 % of the regional policy transactions affected by error (quantifiable and/or non-quantifiable), the Court of Auditors considers that sufficient information was available for the Member State authorities to have detected and corrected one or more of the errors before certifying the expenditure to the Commission’; notes that this is why Parliament endorsed the reservation issued by the Director-General of DG REGIO concerning ERDF/Cohesion Fund/IPA management and control systems for the 2007-2013 programming period in 17 Member States (72 programmes) and asked for rapid actions to be taken;
teavitama Euroopa Parlamenti Bangladeshis käivitatud algatuse Global Sustainability Compact tulemustest;
Remains therefore convinced that Member States must become much more vigilant when managing structural funds;
IX osa
Emphasises in this context the significance of introducing national declarations, signed at the appropriate, preferably political, level, and building on annual management declarations (Article 59(5) of the Financial Regulation);
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 3/2014 „Teise põlvkonna Schengeni infosüsteemi (SIS II) Euroopa Komisjoni poolsest arendamisest saadud kogemused”
Welcomes the fact that since 2009 the Commission has carried out extensive audits on the spot to review the work of audit authorities; notes that it carried out 269 audit missions and reviewed 47 and 84 Audit Authorities for ERDF and ESF, respectively; notes that the missions covered approximately 96 % and 99 % of the total allocations, respectively; is of the opinion that during a financing period the Commission should audit all operational programmes (OP) at least once;
peab kiiduväärseks kontrollikoja eriaruandes nr 3/2014 esitatud leide ja soovitusi;
Welcomes the Commission's use of payment interruptions and suspensions when errors exceed the 2 % materiality threshold; considers that these are useful instruments to protect the Union's financial interests and is convinced that the Commission should concentrate their own audit efforts on ‘bad performers’;
kritiseerib komisjoni selle eest, et komisjon ei eraldanud projekti algusetapis piisavalt eksperte ei SIS II projektiga seotud tehniliseks rakendamiseks ega kvaliteedi hindamiseks;
Is of the opinion that Member States should supply the Commission with sufficiently detailed information about their audits;
soovitab integreerida kõik suuremahulised IT-projektid IT juhtimisemenetluse alla ning kaasata eksperdid mitte ainult komisjoni informaatika peadirektoraadist, vaid ka teistest peadirektoraatidest ja väljastpoolt komisjoni, et sisemisi eksperditeadmisi paremini ära kasutada;
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendation that the Commission should take appropriate measures so that audit authorities can draw on a stable and binding methodological framework which ensures that Union spending in all Member States is checked according to the same standards and that the results are reported accurately;
soovitab komisjonil kasutada liikmesriikide eksperditeadmisi juba iga suuremahulise projekti algusetapis ning moodustada eksperdirühm, kuhu kuuluvad projekti eest vastutavate liikmesriikide esindajad; on seisukohal, et rühma ülesanne ja selle liikmete pädevusvaldkonnad tuleks selgelt kindlaks määrata;
Notes with satisfaction that the Commission presented on 13 December 2013 a communication on the application of net financial corrections on Member States for Agriculture and Cohesion Policy (COM(2013) 934); emphasises however that it will depend on many factors whether the new instrument will lead to more net corrections and hence to a lower error rate in cohesion policy;
kritiseerib asjaolu, et ei komisjon, kes pidi muu hulgas esindama SIS II lõppkasutajate huve, ega juhtivad sidusrühmad ei olnud projekti algetapis isegi teadlikud tehnilistest ja lõppkasutajate esitatud nõuetest;
Calls on the Court of Auditors and the Commission to develop an audit instrument which, on the one hand, records annually errors and irregularities while, on the other hand, also takes into consideration financial correction during the programming period;
ootab, et tulevaste projektide puhul koostab komisjon koostöös liikmesriikidega projekti alguses täpse tehniliste ja lõppkasutajate esitatud nõuete kirjelduse;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has updated the roadmap for the implementation and monitoring of the correct implementation of the ‘single audit’ principle in September 2013, compliance with which should put national authorities in a position to obtain the ‘single audit status’; requests a copy of this document;
peab maksumaksjate raha raiskamiseks seda, et komisjon avaldas üldise projektikonkursi kutse ilma nõudeid selgelt kindlaks määramata;
Is sensitive to the idea that control of expenditure could represent an administrative burden; considers that the obligation of accountability must not discourage potential beneficiaries from applying for financial assistance;
soovitab komisjonil koostada tulevaste IT-projektide puhul realistliku äriplaani ja ajakava, mis põhinevad selgelt kindlaks määratud vormi- ja sisunõuetel ning kulude ja ajalise kavandamise selgel analüüsil, võttes arvesse projekti riske ja keerukust;
Part V
kritiseerib asjaolu, et komisjon püüdis mitmel korral viivitusi ja kasvanud kulusid varjata;
Special Report No 17/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU Climate Finance in the context of External Aid’
nõuab tulevaste IT-projektide puhul võimalikult suurt läbipaistvust asjaomase pädeva parlamendikomisjoni pideva teavitamise kaudu, eriti seoses oluliste otsustega, mis mõjutavad projekti järgmisi etappe, toovad kaasa ettenägemata muutusi kuludes või ajakavas või alternatiivseid lahendusi;
Welcomes the special report examining Union climate finance in the context of external aid as an important contribution to the overall political and financial debate about the Union's climate policy and diplomacy; takes note of the findings, conclusions and recommendations and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
on seisukohal, et hüvitamise nõuete esitamise tingimusi ei tuleks lepingus kohaldada ainult peatöövõtja suhtes; on seisukohal, et tulevastes lepingutes tuleks ette näha tõhus karistusmehhanism, et tagada nõuetele vastavad ja õigeaegsed tulemused;
Welcomes the findings of the report which show that the Commission has managed Union climate-related spending from the Union budget and the European Development Funds (EDF) well;
kritiseerib asjaolu, et komisjon ei lõpetanud lepingut peatöövõtjaga, vaatamata kehvadele tulemustele projekti esimeses etapis;
Welcomes also the work begun by the Commission and Member States on a common Union standard for monitoring, reporting and verification of public climate finance;
kritiseerib komisjoni selle eest, et ta ei nõudnud SIS II rakendamisel moodulitel põhineva arendussüsteemi kasutamist; usub, et kui oleks kasutatud omavahel sobivaid mooduleid, oleks saanud valminud tööd ühelt töövõtjalt teisele üle anda ja vältida enda sidumist ühe konkreetse töövõtjaga;
Reiterates Parliament's position, of which the Court of Auditors took note in its special report, which insists that climate finance should be additional to the 0,7 % target; regrets the failure to confirm Parliament's concept of additionality in the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) negotiations;
kritiseerib komisjoni selle eest, et lepingu esialgne maksumus ületati lepingu üle peetud uute läbirääkimiste tulemusel kaheksakordselt, vaatamata komisjoni määruse (EÜ, Euratom) nr 2342/2002 [13] artikli 126 lõike 1 punktile e, milles on sätestatud, et lepingu väärtus ei või ületada 50 % esialgse lepingu summast;
Points out however that there is a need for the Commission to exercise sufficient leadership to maximise its international impact and to consolidate the tools for shaping conditions for the Union's climate/green diplomacy in future years, in particular to deliver the climate-related benchmarks within the DCI as adopted in December 2013, stating that it ‘should contribute to the overall objective of addressing at least 20 % of the Union budget to low carbon and climate resilient society, and that GPGC should use at least 25 % of its funds to cover climate change and environment (Recital 20 of the DCI)’; points out that Annex IV to the DCI also specifies that under the Global Public Goods and Challenges (GPGC) programme, 27 % of the funds are allocated to Environment and Climate Change and at least 50 % of the GPGC programme will serve for climate related action and environment-related objectives;
märgib sellega seoses, et komisjoni delegeeritud määruse (EL) nr 1268/2012 [14] artikli 134 lõike 1 punkt b tuleb võib-olla üle vaadata, sest tehnilistel või kunstilistel põhjustel lepingu sõlmimisel ühe teatava töövõtjaga ei tohi kõrvale jätta kaitseklauslit sama lõike punktis e ja lubada põhilepingu esialgse summa ebaproportsionaalset mitmekordistumist;
Welcomes the fact that a commitment to improving EU Joint Programming since 2011 has been made in some 40 countries; points out however that coordination between the Commission and Member States in climate finance for developing countries still needs to be improved considerably to not only meet the 2020 commitment but to also allow the Union to stay a frontrunner in terms of climate actions and to combat corruption in developing countries;
märgib, et projekti esialgse maksumuse olulise suurenemise korral või oluliste muutuste korral seoses eeldatava kasu, riskide või alternatiivsete lahendustega peavad eelarvepädevad institutsioonid eelnevalt oma heakskiidu andma;
Reiterates Parliament's support for joint programming and its recognition of the significant progress made on this; looks forward to being re-consulted, as promised by the Commission, if such programming leads to changes in the DCI programming;
mõistab hukka eelarvevahendite eraldamise muudatused mitmel korral ilma eelarvepädevate institutsioonide heakskiiduta;
Notes the explanations about the difficulties in tracking and reporting due to the divergent reporting practices of Member States given in the Accountability Report from the Commission on Financing for Development, published on 3 July 2014 in the form of a Staff Working Paper, including a section in Volume I on Climate Finance which provides information on Union climate financing; notes that the report repeats the figure of EUR 7,3 billion of Fast Start Finance made available by the Union and Member States, and urges further improvements in reporting on the impact and results of development aid;
kiidab heaks informaatika peadirektoraadi poolt alates 2011. aastast soovitatavad projektijuhtimise suunised; on seisukohal, et nende suuniste põhjal peab projekti juhtkomitee andma iga järgmise etapi alustamiseks heakskiidu;
Future developments
rõhutab tulevikku suunatud tegevuse vajalikkust, sest selle aastakümne lõpuks võib SIS II end ammendada ja tekib vajadus SIS III järele; loodab sellega seoses, et SIS III ettevalmistused viiakse ellu oluliselt paremini;
Calls for more earmarking of funds to specific sectors, including climate finance when channelled via Budget Support, and more transparency over the use of funds overall;
X osa
Considers that the Commission and the EEAS should strengthen their communication policy, both on the support provided globally or to individual recipient countries and to project the Union's values;
Kontrollikoja eriaruanne nr 4/2014 „ELi veepoliitika eesmärkide integreerimine ühisesse põllumajanduspoliitikasse: osalised edusammud”
Recognises that corruption remains a significant barrier to effective climate finance and urges the Commission to step up its efforts in regards to working with development partners on anti-corruption issues;
kutsub komisjoni üles esitama liidu seaduseandjale ettepaneku vajalike muudatuste tegemiseks praegustes vahendites (nõuetele vastavus ja maaelu areng), et tagada kooskõla Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiviga 2000/60/EÜ [15] (veepoliitika raamdirektiiv), või vajaduse korral uute vahendite kohta, mille abil on võimalik saavutada ambitsioonikamaid eesmärke veepoliitika eesmärkide integreerimisel ühisesse põllumajanduspoliitikasse;
Requests that the Commission propose a road map to the Council for the scaling-up of climate finance towards the Copenhagen Accord 2020 target, including a definition of private finance;
kutsub liikmesriike üles tegema veepoliitika raamdirektiivist lähtuvalt järgmist:
Requests that the Commission make an independent evaluation of the Global Climate Change Alliance, including an examination of why most Member States did not choose to co-finance it;
parandama puudused, mis selgitati välja nõuetele vastavuse kontrollimiseks tehtud auditi käigus;
Asks the Commission and the EEAS to report on the extent to which the target of spending 20 % of the Union budget and the EDF over 2014 to 2020 on climate related action is implemented in development aid, specifying what has been committed and disbursed;
kehtestama rikkumiste korral süstemaatiliselt asjakohased karistused;
Calls on the Commission and Member States, in the framework of Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] (Monitoring Mechanism Regulation), to agree common standards for monitoring, reporting and verification, in particular with respect to the definition of ‘new and additional’, the application of the Rio Markers and reporting on the disbursement of climate finance;
keskenduma maaelu arendamise programmides endisest rohkem veevarudega seotud probleemide tuvastamisele ja lahendamisele ning programmide sobivuse tagamisele veemajanduskavadega;
Invites the Commission and Member States to intensify their cooperation to implement the EU Code of Conduct on Division of Labour in the field of climate finance, notably with respect to the exchange of information on allocations by countries, joint programming and preventing and combatting corruption in climate finance;
looma ja rangelt rakendama kaitsemehhanisme, et vältida maaelu arengu raames rahastatava tegevuse negatiivset kõrvalmõju veevarudele;
Part VI
aktiivselt uurima ja asjakohaselt edendama veevarudega seotud probleemide lahendamiseks määratud rahaliste vahendite kasutamist, lähtudes usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise põhimõttest;
Special Report No 18/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The reliability of the results of the Member States' checks of the agricultural expenditure’
ootab, et komisjon soovitaks asjakohaseid mehhanisme, mis avaldaksid reaalselt suurt positiivset mõju veepoliitika raamdirektiivi programmidokumentide kvaliteedile liikmesriikides ja aitaksid kinni pidada veepoliitika raamdirektiiviga kehtestatud ajakavast; on seda silmas pidades seisukohal, et veepoliitika raamdirektiivi rakendamise miinimumnõuded tuleks tagada enne maaelu arengu vahendite sidumist;
Acknowledges that the systems examined in the Special Report No 18/2013 have been changed by the new CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) regulations, with increased responsibilities given to the certification bodies in the Member States in the field of the verification of legality and regularity of expenditure and the verification of control results communicated to the Commission;
kutsub liikmesriike üles kiirendama viivitamata veepoliitika raamdirektiivi rakendamisprotsessi ja parandama järgmiseks majandamistsükliks (2015) oma veemajanduskavade kvaliteeti, kirjeldades meetmeid ükshaaval (nt nende ulatus, ajakava, eesmärgid ja maksumus) ning muutes need nii tegevustasandil kui ka kohalikul/põllumajandustootja tasandil piisavalt selgeks ja konkreetseks;
Welcomes the ongoing efforts of the Commission for the simplification of CAP; expects that the simplification of eligibility criteria leads to the simplification of control rules and can contribute towards a lower error rate;
kutsub komisjoni üles avardama oma teadmisi vee kvaliteedi/kvantiteedi ja põllumajandustegevuse seose kohta, täiustades olemasolevaid seiresüsteeme ning tagades selle, et nendega oleks võimalik mõõta vähemalt põllumajandustegevuse tagajärjel veevarudele avalduva surve muutumist; on seisukohal, et see aitaks määratleda piirkondi, kus ÜPP vahendeid kõige rohkem vajatakse;