natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The packages consist of an airport services agreement and a marketing services agreement (sometimes combined within the same legal medium).
Lõpetuseks viitavad olemasolevad andmed sellele, et 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava tulemusel kerkisid lennujaama tulud järk-järgult (lennundusega seotud ja lennundusega mitteseotud tulude kasv […] eurolt aastas (2006. aastal) […] euroni aastas (2010. aastal)).
These transactions involve several ‘prices’, namely the various airport charges, price of the ground handling services and price of the marketing services, some of which depend on the number of passengers and others on the number of aircraft movements, with others involving fixed amounts.
Komisjon märgib veel, et 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava hindamisel tuleb ka arvesse võtta, mil määral võib kava pidada osaks lennujaama üldstrateegiast, mis peaks viima vähemalt pikaajalises perspektiivis kasumlikkuseni.
Each of these transactions therefore leads to a complex set of financial flows between the airport operator and the airline and its subsidiaries, consisting of the revenue from the airport charges, revenue linked to the ground handling services and revenue linked to the marketing services.
Sellega seoses peab komisjon võtma arvesse kättesaadavaid faktilisi tõendeid ja arengut, mida oli mõistlik eeldada ajal, mil 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava välja töötati.
Accordingly, a comparison between just the airport charges invoiced by the KFBG to the airlines concerned and the airport charges invoiced at the comparison airports would not provide any useful indication as to whether the MEO test was satisfied.
Iseäranis peaks komisjon võtma arvesse lennutranspordituru liberaliseerimisest tingitud muutusi turul, odavlennuettevõtete ja teiste otselende sooritavate lennuettevõtete turule sisenemist ja arengut, muutusi lennujaamasektori organisatsioonilises ja majanduslikus ülesehituses ning lennujaamade funktsioonide mitmekesisuse ja keerukuse astet, lennuettevõtete ja lennujaamade vahelise konkurentsi tihenemist ning ebakindlat majanduskeskkonda, mis on tingitud turul valitsevate tingimuste muutumisest, või mis tahes muud ebakindlust majanduskeskkonnas.
At the very least, in order to validly compare the transactions covered by this assessment, it would be necessary to identify, for the airports in the comparison sample, a set of comparable transactions, which must particularly include equivalent marketing services and equivalent ground handling services.
Komisjon märgib, et nagu on kirjeldatud põhjendustes 279–280, oli KLU-l mitu põhjust (nagu puudujäägid AUA lennujaamatasude makstavates summades 2003. aasta oktoobrist 2005. aasta oktoobrini ja Ryanairi lahkumine 2005. aasta oktoobris) pidada 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava vajalikuks sammuks, et tagada lennujaama säilimine ja kasumlikkus.
Identifying such a sample of comparable transactions would prove impossible, given that the transactions covered by this assessment are so complex and specific, and all the more so as the prices of ground handling services and marketing services are rarely made public and would be difficult to obtain in order to form a basis for comparison.
Lõpetuseks leiab komisjon, et KLU taristu on avatud kõikidele lennuettevõtetele, mitte ei ole mõeldud kasutamiseks mingile kindlale lennuettevõttele.
Lastly, assuming that it could be established, based on a valid comparative analysis, that the ‘prices’ applied in the various transactions covered by this assessment were equivalent to or higher than the ‘market prices’ established using the sample of comparison transactions, the Commission could not, however, conclude that those transactions corresponded to the market price if it proved that, on their conclusion, the airport operator may have expected them to lead to incremental costs higher than the incremental revenues.
Peale selle avaldati 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava KLU veebilehel ning oli avatud kõigile huvitatud lennuettevõtetele.
An MEO would not in fact be interested in offering goods or services at the ‘market price’ if this led to an incremental loss.
Neid kaalutlusi silmas pidades leiab komisjon, et KLU käitus nagu turumajanduse tingimustes tegutsev ettevõtja, kui ta 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava vastu võttis.
The Commission considers it appropriate to reiterate in the context of this analysis that, following the adoption of the 2014 Guidelines, both Austria and the interested parties were invited to submit comments on the application of those guidelines to the present case (see recital 8).
Seega ei andnud kõnealune meede asjaomastele lennuettevõtetele majanduslikku eelist ning see ei kujutanud endast riigiabi ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 tähenduses.
In the light of all the above, the Commission considers that the approach generally recommended in the 2014 Guidelines for applying the MEO test to relationships between airports and airlines, namely the ex ante incremental profitability analysis, must be applied to the present case.
Kompromisskokkuleppe sõlmimine AUAga ja 2005. aasta stimuleerimiskava kohaldamine AUA suhtes
This approach is justified by the fact that an airport operator may have an objective interest in concluding a transaction with an airline where it may reasonably expect this transaction to improve its profits (or reduce its losses) compared to a counterfactual situation in which this transaction is not concluded, regardless of any comparison with the conditions offered to airlines by other airport operators, or even with the conditions offered by the same airport operator to other airlines.
Lennutransporditeenuseid pakkudes on AUA seotud majandustegevusega ja seega on ta ettevõte ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 tähenduses.
In addition to the above considerations, the airport infrastructure must be open to all airlines and not dedicated to a specific airline in order to exclude that the advantage resulting from compatible aid to the airport operator is not passed on to a specific airline.
Et hinnata, kas riigile kuuluva lennujaama (mille käsutuses on riiklikud vahendid) ja lennuettevõtte vahel sõlmitud lepinguga antakse viimasele majanduslik eelis, tuleb analüüsida, kas see leping on kooskõlas turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja põhimõttega, nagu on märgitud põhjendustes 261–278.
The Commission also notes in this context that price differentiation is a standard business practice.
Lisanduvate kulude ja tulude hindamise tähtaeg
Such differentiated pricing policies should, however, be commercially justified.
Kui turumajanduse tingimustes tegutsev ettevõtja otsustab, kas sõlmida lennujaamateenuste leping ja/või turundusteenuste leping, valib ta hindamiseks ajavahemiku, mille aluseks on kõnealuse lepingu tähtaeg.
The 2005 incentive scheme was introduced to enhance the competitiveness of KLU.
Teisisõnu hindab turumajanduse tingimustes tegutsev kaalutlev ettevõtja lisanduvaid kulusid ja tulusid lepingute kohaldamise kestel.
When drawing up the 2005 incentive scheme, the operator of KLU analysed passenger numbers, airport movements as well as the financial results of the previous years.
Käesoleval juhul tuleb meelde tuletada KFBG olukorra erisust AUAga sõlmitud lepingu allkirjastamise hetkel.
According to Austria, a market comparison undertaken at that time showed that KLU due to its high average fixed costs was a particularly expensive airport in Austria.
17. novembril 2003 esitas KFBG seega lennujaamatasude tasumata maksete tõttu Landesgerichtile (piirkonnakohus) AUA vastu tsiviilhagi.
The Commission observes that since 1 October 2003 AUA had unilaterally reduced its payments for the turnaround fees due at KLU.
Kui KFBG kirjutas pärast kõnealust kohtuvaidlust 20. oktoobril 2005 alla kompromisskokkuleppele, pidi ta võtma arvesse mitte üksnes tulevikus AUA poolt makstavaid lennujaamatasusid, vaid ka varasemaid tegemata jäänud makseid, mida ta lootis tagasi saada.
Although on 20 October 2005 KFBG and AUA signed a settlement agreement concerning the payment of turnaround feed during the period of 1 October 2003 until 20 October 2005, KFBG had to face considerable shortfalls regarding the payments of airport charges from October 2003 to October 2005.
Hinnang
In addition, all 2002 agreements between KFBG, DMG, Ryanair, LV and AMS ended suddenly in October 2005, when Ryanair stopped to operate the passenger air services between KLU and STN due to economic reasons.
Esimene neist menetlustest käis Landesgerichtis ning puudutas KFBG tsiviilhagi AUA vastu tasumata lennujaamatasude tõttu.
All these factors together led KLU to reconsider its pricing policy and to introduce the 2005 incentive scheme.
Teise menetluse puhul oli tegemist kartelliseaduse kohase taotlusega, mille AUA oli esitanud riiklikule konkurentsikohtule KFBG vastu.
According to the information submitted by Austria, a detailed ex ante profitability study was prepared by the executive board of KFBG and authorised by the supervisory board of KFBG.
Kompromisskokkuleppes lepiti kokku järgmises:
When assessing this ex ante profitability study, the Commission observes that KFBG prepared a comprehensive study on the basis of its full cost basis accounting system.
AUA kohustus KFBG-le maksma […] euro suuruse summa.
This ex ante cost-benefit analysis contains a detailed formula for the calculation of the full costs of KFBG.
Pooled leppisid kokku, et KFBG stimuleerimiskava moodustab alates 1. septembrist 2005 kompromisskokkuleppe osa ning see kehtib AUA suhtes tagasiulatuvalt alates 1. oktoobrist 2003.
The costs are split into different cost factors that cover all costs incurred when operating the airport (landing tariff, infrastructure landing tariff, infrastructure air tariff, passenger tariff, traffic handling fee, ramp handling fee).
Austria ametiasutused kinnitavad, et KFBG/DMG ei töötanud enne AUAga kompromisskokkuleppe sõlmimist välja eelnevat äriplaani.
The profitability study also contains a detailed explanation on how the cost factor of EUR […] for the costs depending on the number of flights, i.e. MTOW, and of EUR […] depending on the number of passengers were calculated, based on the cost calculation system of KFBG in force at the time.
Lisaks selgitasid Austria ametiasutused, et KFBG, KLH ja advokaadibüroo, mis KFBGd mõlema kohtumenetluse puhul esindas, olid kokkuleppe allkirjastamise õiguslikke ja majanduslikke eeliseid ja ebasoodsaid tagajärgi põhjalikult hinnanud.
As 51 % of the traffic handling was subcontracted to Tyrolean Airways, these costs were indicated in the cost calculation as costs of services of a third party.
Nende hinnangute ja kaalutluste tõendamiseks esitas Austria mitu aruannet ja protokolli, mille juhatus oli esitanud KFBG nõukogule, ning kättesaadavad kohtumenetluse dokumendid.
As non-aeronautical income, KFBG listed income factors such as the airport shops, the parking at the airport, the freight storehouse and the income from rent and lease agreements.
Ühelt poolt võlgnes AUA 2005. aasta oktoobris KLU-le maksmata jäetud tagasilennuks valmistumise tasudena kokku […] euro suuruse summa.
The average income of these sources less the costs of these sources, measured on the basis of observed data from recent years, resulted in an average non-aeronautical income of EUR […] per passenger.
Teiselt poolt peab meenutama, et AUA andis selle menetluse käigus 7. jaanuaril 2004 mahuka kostja vastuse.
Brought down to a round figure, KFBG indicated EUR […] of non-aeronautical income per passenger.
Seega seisis KFBG oma püüdluses nõuda AUA-lt välja täismahus lennujaamatasude maksed silmitsi tugeva juriidilise vastuseisuga lennuettevõtte poolt.
All those underlying assumptions appear reasonable.
Samal ajal olid tasumata lennujaamatasudel ning venival kohtuvaidlusel tõsised tagajärjed KFBG majanduslikule olukorrale.
In particular, they are based on cost and revenue observations and, in the case of cost data, on an elaborate cost measurement system.
KFBG nõukogu aruannetest selgub, et KFBG likviidsusolukord oli selle võlgnevuse tõttu väga raske ning KFBG osanikud pidid maksma […] euro suuruse toetuse.
These established values for costs and incomes of KFBG were used subsequently in the cost-benefit analysis in different calculation models.
See vajadus rahaliste vahendite järele nähtub ka 2003.–2005. aasta KFBG rahavoogude aruannetest.
These models represented different envisaged routes from and to KLU with different aircrafts and under the assumption of varying degrees of capacity utilisation.
Nagu nähtub kohtumenetluse dokumentidest, ei olnud KFBG-l võimalik saada ajutist ettekirjutust AUA-lt maksete saamiseks, kuna õiguskaitsevahendi kasutamise tingimus ei olnud KFBG puhul täidetud.
The routes chosen corresponded to typical routes of interest of a small regional airport such as Klagenfurt airport.
Samal ajal keeldus AUA maksmast tagasilennuks valmistumise tasude kogusummat, kuna need olevat märkimisväärselt suuremad kui vastavad Ryanairi poolt KLU-le makstavad tasud.
On request of the Commission, Austria submitted additional models, with the aim of covering all typical scenarios and possible routes of interest for KFBG in 2005.
Peale selle väitis AUA, et KLU rikkus Austria lennundusseaduse (Luftfahrtgesetz, edaspidi „LFG“) paragrahvi 63 ja tsiviillennuvälja kodukorra (Zivilflugplatz-Betriebsordnung, edaspidi „ZFBO“) paragrahvi 20.
Austria has submitted that KLU expected that no additional investments would be required to provide additional airport services to airlines attracted by the 2005 incentive scheme.
LFG paragrahvi 63 kohaselt tuleb kõigile lennuliikluses osalejatele tagada võrdsetel tingimustel tsiviillennuväljadele juurdepääs.
In this context, the Commission observes that the 2005 incentive scheme offered discounts only for new airlines, new connections, or increased passenger numbers with the consequence that it did not impact negatively on the status quo at the airport.
ZFBO paragrahvi 20 kohaselt tuleb lennujaamatasud arvutada objektiivsete tunnuste alusel.
Austria confirmed that there was no need to hire new staff or to expand existing infrastructure or other equipment in order to serve new airlines or connections (for instance the existing baggage belts and personnel were sufficient).
Lisaks kinnitab mõlema protsessi ajal toimunud KFBG ja AUA vaheline kirjavahetus, et menetluse ajal ähvardas AUA KFBGd, et lõpetab tulevikus AUA sihtlennujaamade teenindamise KLUst.
Hence, the Commission concludes that the incremental costs were limited to the incentives offered by the 2005 incentive scheme.
KLU jaoks oli – ning on – AUA lennutransporditeenus Klagenfurti ja Austria pealinna Viini vahel siiski kõige olulisem lennuühendus.
Moreover, KLU expected that with any new airline or connection, aeronautical as well as non-aeronautical revenues would be generated.
Seega oli regulaarlennuliini säilitamine AUA sõlmlennujaama Viinis KFBG jaoks ülioluline.
Given that the level of costs remained stable, any new airline or connection would, according to Austria, provide a positive contribution to the airport's profitability.
AUA ähvardustest tingituna otsis KFBG 2004. ja 2005. aastal alternatiivseid pakkujaid, et lennuühendus Viini oleks võimalik tagada ka siis, kui AUA kaotab täielikult KLUs osutatavad teenused.
KLU could therefore expect from an ex ante perspective that any new airline or connection would lead to an increase of revenues as no investments were necessary at the same time.
Nagu Austria märkis, ei suutnud KFBG siiski leida ühtegi teist lennuettevõtet, kes oleks KLU ja Viini lennujaama vahel pakkunud AUA-le sarnaseid teenuseid.
The Commission is of the view that indeed the 2005 incentive scheme has been incrementally profitable form an ex ante perspective.
KLU jaoks oleks lennuliikluse lõpetamine AUA poolt tähendanud kõige olulisema lennuettevõtte kaotamist ning viinud ülisuurte võlgade tekkimiseni.
This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that KFBG indeed managed to attract a number of new airlines (such as Air Berlin, Robin Hood, Condor, Lufthansa, Germanwings), to intensify existing destinations (AUA), and to establish new connections after the introduction of the 2005 incentive scheme.
Komisjoni taotlusel esitas Austria 20. oktoobril 2005 KFBG finantsolukorra üksikasjalikult rekonstrueeritud eelanalüüsi.
KLU's discount-based strategy to increase its business was successful.
Tabel 8
The available data finally demonstrates that the 2005 incentive scheme resulted in a gradual increase of revenue for the airport (aviation and non-aeronautical revenues from EUR […] in 2006 to EUR […] in 2010).
KFBG ja AUA vaheliste suhete nelja erineva stsenaariumi rekonstrueeritud eelanalüüs
The Commission further notes that when assessing the 2005 incentive scheme, it should also assess the extent to which the arrangements can be considered part of the implementation of an overall strategy of the airport to lead to profitability at least in the long term.
Stsenaariumite arvutamine 2005. aasta ekstrapoleerimise alusel
Notably, the Commission should take into account the market changes induced by the liberalisation in the air transport market, the market entry and development of low cost carriers and other point-to-point carriers, changes in the organisational and economic structure of the airport industry as well as the degree of diversification and complexity of the functions undertaken by airports, the enhancement of the competition between airlines and airports, the uncertain economic environment due to the changes in the prevailing market conditions or any other uncertainty in the economic environment.
koos täismäära maksva AUAga
The Commission notes that, as described in recitals 279-280, several reasons (such as the shortfalls regarding the payments of airport charges from October 2003 to October 2005 by AUA as well as the departure of Ryanair as of October 2005) led KLU to consider the 2005 incentive scheme a necessary step in ensuring its future viability and profitability.
Stsenaarium 2
Finally, the Commission notes that the airport infrastructure of KLU is open to all airlines and not dedicated to a specific airline.
täielikult kaotatud AUA teenused
Likewise the 2005 incentive scheme was published on the website of KLU and was open to all interested airlines.
Stsenaarium 3
In the light of these considerations, the Commission concludes that KLU acted like a MEO when adopting the 2005 incentive scheme.
koos stiimuleid saava AUAga
Therefore, the measure did not grant the affected airlines any economic advantage and did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article of 107(1) TFEU.
Stsenaarium 4
It has to be emphasised that this conclusion only holds for airlines to which the 2005 incentive scheme was applied as such.
AUA protsessiaasta
Whenever the application of the scheme to a given airline was combined with a bilateral agreement, for instance a marketing agreement, this conclusion does not automatically apply.
Kasum/kahjum
Indeed, in such circumstances, the combined effects of the incentive scheme and of the bilateral agreement have to be taken into account when applying the MEO principle.
Aastakasum/-kahjum
The conclusion of the settlement agreement with AUA and the application of the 2005 incentive scheme to AUA
Rahavoog
AUA, by providing air transport services, performs an economic activity and therefore constitutes an undertaking within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Rahavoog pärast investeeringuid
In order to assess whether an agreement between a publicly-owned airport with public resources at its disposal and an airline confers an economic advantage on the latter, it is necessary to analyse whether that agreement complied with the MEO principle as described above under recitals 261 to 278.
2005. aasta alus (tuhandetes eurodes)
Time frame for the Assessment of incremental costs and revenues
Lahkuvad reisijad
When deciding on whether to enter into an airport services agreement and/or a marketing services agreement, a MEO will choose a time frame for its assessment based on the term of the agreement.
Lennunduse tulud
In other words, a prudent MEO will assess the incremental costs and revenues for the term of application of the agreement.
Stiimul
In this case a particularity has to be observed for the situation of KFBG at the moment of signing the agreement with AUA.
Tulu väärtuse korrigeerimine (AAG)
On 20 October 2005 KFBG had to take into consideration not only the development of its contractual relation with AUA for the future, but also the past until October 2003.
Lennunduse tulud
Since 1 October 2003 AUA had unilaterally reduced its payments for the turnaround fees due at that time at KLU.
Muu tulu
On 17 November 2003 KFBG therefore brought against AUA a civil law action at the local district court concerning the airport fees still due.
Ostud
When signing the settlement agreement on 20 October 2005 following this dispute, KFBG therefore had to take into consideration not only the future airport charges to be paid by AUA but also the still outstanding airport charges of the past period, which it hoped to recover.
Personalikulud
Assessment
Mahakandmised
On 20 October 2005 KFBG and AUA signed a settlement agreement concerning the period from 1 October 2003 to 20 October 2005.
Tegevuskulud
In this settlement agreement the two parties agreed to end two different ongoing litigations.
Projektikulud
The first litigation at the local district court concerned the civil law action of KFBG against AUA concerning the airport fees still due.
Turunduskoostöö hüvitis
The second litigation concerned an action of AUA against KFBG in competition law at the national cartel court.
Finantstulem
The following points were agreed within the settlement agreement:
Aasta kasum või (–) kahjum
AUA agreed to pay EUR […] to KFBG,
Rahavoog (aasta kasum/kahjum + Afa)
both parties agreed that the 2005 incentive scheme became part of the settlement agreement and was to be applied for AUA as of 1 October 2003.
Vajalikud asendusinvesteeringud 1,5–2 miljonit eurot aastas.
Austria asserts that KFBG/DMG did not prepare an ex ante business plan before concluding the settlement agreement with AUA.
Projekti AAG sihtlennujaamad Viin ja Frankfurt (2005)
It explained that prior to the signature of the settlement agreement, KFBG, KLH and the law firm representing KFBG in both court proceedings had evaluated in detail the legal and economic advantages and disadvantages of signing the agreement.
MTOW (Viin ja Frankfurt)
To demonstrate these evaluations and considerations Austria has submitted numerous reports and protocols submitted by the management board of KFBG to the supervisory board of KFBG as well as the available legal documents of the legal proceedings.
Lahkuvad reisijad (Viin ja Frankfurt)
From these documents the following conclusion can be drawn:
Rotatsioonid
On the one hand, AUA had in October 2005 a total debt of EUR […] of unpaid turnaround fees towards KLU.
Projekti tulud
For this reason KFBG had brought a civil law action at the local district court against AUA, as it believed that AUA was not entitled to unilaterally reduce its payments as of October 2003.
Projektikulud/piirkulud
As KFBG had fulfilled its obligations from its air service agreement with AUA, it seemed consequent for KFBG to take legal action.
Lennuettevalmistus
On the other hand it has to be observed that AUA submitted on 7 January 2004 a lengthy defence plea in this proceeding.
Lennust sõltuv
KFBG was therefore facing strong legal opposition of AUA while trying to enforce its claims of payment of the full airport charges by AUA.
Reisijatest sõltuv
At the same time, the economic situation of KFBG was seriously affected by the outstanding airport charges and the length of the ongoing dispute.
Projektikulude summa (ümardatud)
The reports of the supervisory board of KFBG demonstrate that the outstanding airport charges had a very negative impact on the liquidity of KFBG and that as a consequence the shareholders of KFBG were obliged to give KFBG a grant of EUR […].
Projekti tulemus (ümardatud)
This need for cash is confirmed from the cash flow statements of KFBG of the years 2003-2005.
Stiimul (ümardatud)