natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The 2005 Aviation guidelines and the 2014 Aviation guidelines precisely define these compatibility principles, but it remains the case that operating aid granted to airlines may be declared compatible by the Commission where it contributes to the development of smaller airports through a net increase in traffic on new routes, where the aid is necessary in the sense that it is not granted for a route already operated by the same or another airline or a similar route, where it is limited in time and where the route for which the aid is granted is likely to become profitable, where the amount is linked to the net development of traffic and where the aid is granted transparently and without discrimination, and where it is not combined with any other type of aid.
Kuna kõnealuses otsuses käsitletakse ajaperioodi, kui KLH veel eksisteeris, kasutatakse kogu otsuses nime „KLH“.
In this regard, in paragraph 212 of the opening decision, the Commission stated that it would assess the compatibility of the 2002 agreements with Ryanair, AMS and LV in the light of these criteria.
Kuulub ametisaladuse alla.
It should be noted that neither Austria nor any interested third party has disputed the application of these criteria.
Sulgudes olevad summad on stiimulite summad, mis maksti AUA-le kompromisskokkuleppe tulemusena (vt jagu 2.9) tagasiulatuvalt.
In conclusion, the Commission takes the view that, in this case, the compatibility of the 2002 agreements should be assessed in the light of the aforementioned principles directly on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Stiimulite rakendamine AUA-le toimus enne 2005. aastat kompromisskokkuleppe alusel (vt jagu 2.9).
The 2006 agreements with Ryanair
Nagu nähtub põhjendustest 65 ja 71, nähti kahes hankes siiski ette erinev tagasilennuks valmistumise tasude hüvitamine.
As regards start-up aid, the 2014 Aviation Guidelines state that: ‘the Commission will apply the principles set out in these guidelines to all notified start-up aid measures in respect of which it is called upon to take a decision from 4 April 2014, even where the measures were notified prior that date.
Ryanair tõi näiteks […] lennujaamad.
In accordance with the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid, the Commission will apply to unlawful start-up aid to airlines the rules in force at the time when the aid was granted.
See akronüüm tähistab turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva investori põhimõtet („Market Economy Investor Principle“).
Accordingly, it will not apply the principles set out in these guidelines in the case of unlawful start-up aid to airlines granted before 4 April 2014.’
Kogukulude katmise süsteemi (ühe kassa põhimõte) puhul võetakse lennujaamatasude suuruse kehtestamisel arvesse lennujaama operaatori kõik tulud kõigist lennujaama tegevustest, sh lennundusega mitteseotud majandustegevusest (nt kaupluste, restoranide ja parklate käitamine).
The 2005 Aviation Guidelines, in turn, stipulate that:
Aga kahe kassa põhimõtte puhul võetakse lennujaamatasude suuruse kehtestamisel arvesse üksnes lennundusega seotud tulud (peamiselt lennujaamatasude ja maapealsete teenuste pealt saadud tulud).
‘the Commission will assess the compatibility of […] start-up aid granted without its authorisation and which therefore infringes Article 88(3) EC [now Article 108(3) TFEU], on the basis of these guidelines if payment of the aid started after the guidelines were published in the Official Journal of the European Union.’
Ingliskeelses reklaamimajanduses tähistatakse kõnealuseid reklaamihinnakirju terminiga „rate cards“.
As the agreements of 2006 with Ryanair were concluded after the publication of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines in the Official Journal on 9 December 2005, those guidelines constitute the applicable legal basis for the assessment of their compatibility with the internal market.
Seejuures on tegemist trüki- või ringhäälingumeedia poolt või oma veebilehtedel reklaamipindu pakkuvate ettevõtete poolt reklaamihindade loeteludega.
The 2003 agreement with HLX was signed before the 2005 Guidelines were published on 9 December 2005.
Komisjoni teatis riigiabi mõiste kohta ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 tähenduses (ELT C 262, 19.7.2016, lk 1).
With regard to the compatibility of aid granted before this date, the Commission refers to recitals 523 to 530.
Ajal, kui Oxera esitas oma märkused (st 2015. aasta jaanuaris), oli kõnealune dokument avaldatud eelnõuna avalikuks konsulteerimiseks.
In conclusion, the Commission takes the view that, in this case, the compatibility of the 2003 agreement with HLX should be assessed in the light of the aforementioned general principles directly on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Oxera viitas komisjoni lähenemisviisile Pau ja Nîmes'i lennujaamu käsitlevates otsustes, milles komisjon arvutas eeldatava lennundusega mitteseotud tulud iga lahkuva reisija kohta, kasutades lepingute allkirjastamisele eelnevast ajast pärinevaid lennujaamade kohta kogutud andmeid ning võttes arvesse vastavat inflatsiooni.Komisjoni 23. juuli 2014. aasta otsus (EL) 2015/1227 riigiabi SA.22614 (C 53/07) kohta, mida Prantsusmaa on andnud Pau-Béarni kaubandus-tööstuskojale ning ettevõtetele Ryanair, Airport Marketing Services ja Transavia (ELT L 201, 30.7.2015, lk 109), punkt 414.Komisjoni 23. juuli 2014. aasta otsus (EL) 2016/633 riigiabi SA.33961 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) kohta, mida Prantsusmaa andis Nîmes – Uzès – Le Vigani kaubandus- ja tööstuskojale, ettevõttele Veolia Transport Aéroport de Nîmes, ettevõtjale Ryanair Limited ja ettevõttele Airport Marketing Services Limited (ELT L 113, 27.4.2016, lk 32), punkt 436.
Regarding the applicable legal framework reference is made to recitals 531-533.
Ryanairi tegevuse alguse aastaks märkis Oxera vastavalt aasta, kui Ryanair alustas lennujaamas nn olulist tegevust; see omakorda defineeriti esimese aastana, kui Ryanairiga lendavad reisijad moodustasid enam kui 50 % kõigist Ryanairiga lendavate reisijate maksimaalsest koguarvust, keda transporditi ajavahemikul 1994–2012 samas lennujaamas ühe aasta jooksul.
As the agreement of 2008 with Tuifly was concluded after the publication of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines in the Official Journal on 9 December 2005, those guidelines constitute the applicable legal basis for the assessment of their compatibility with the internal market.
Marseilles' esimese astme halduskohtu otsus (20.10.2009).
Compatibility assessment pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU: the aid must be limited in time and involve a route likely to become profitable
Otsuses on kohus seisukohal, et Marseille' lennujaam saab AMSiga sõlmitud lepingu raames tegeliku vastutasu turundusteenuste näol.
The Commission notes that, despite its invitation in this respect, Austria did not provide any viability study for the Klagenfurt-London route covered by the 2002 agreements to prove that the aid granted through the agreements in question was justified.
Komisjoni 27. jaanuari 2010. aasta otsus 2011/60/EL riigiabi C 12/08 (ex NN 74/07) kohta – Slovakkia – Bratislava lennujaama ja Ryanairi vaheline leping (ELT L 27, 1.2.2011, lk 24), põhjendus 114.
Accordingly, based on the facts on record, it seems that, for the authorities that granted the aid in question, there was no clear prospect of the Klagenfurt-London route becoming viable without aid in the short term.
Otsuses leiab komisjon, et ka siis, kui üks lennujaam ei tasu täiendava turustamise eest Ryanairi veebilehel ning seda mainitakse kõnealusel veebilehel üksnes ühe sihtkohana, ei saa välistada, et lennujaam saab sellest teatavat kasu (vt põhjendus 114).
The Commission stresses in this respect that the explanations submitted by the Austrian authorities on the economic benefits of the route operated by Ryanair analyse the impact that they might have on the region's development, but do not include projections of the future viability of these routes or other routes likely to be operated by Ryanair in the future.
Otsuses leiab komisjon, et uuritud leping on kooskõlas turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja põhimõttega.
Moreover, the Commission notes that, although these measures were limited in time, the 5-year term of each agreement was not necessary for or proportional to the costs incurred in launching a new route given that, in the aviation sector, a contractual term of less than 3 years is usually sufficient.
Objektiivsed kriteeriumid nagu reklaami liik (lingid, ribareklaam, tekstilõigud, reklaami pikkus ja välimus ekraanil), lehe külastajate arv päeva jooksul ning nimetatud lennujaamast väljuvate ja lennujaama saabuvate lennuühenduste arv.
The Commission therefore considers that the 2002 agreements do not meet the condition that the measures must be limited in time and involve routes likely to become profitable.
Vt http://airportmarketingservices.com/pdfs/ratecard.pdf.
As this condition is not fulfilled, there is no necessity for the Commission to assess the other conditions mentioned above.
18. juuni 1998. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-35/96: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303.
The aid must be proportional, i.e. the amount must be linked to the net development of traffic.
23. aprilli 1991. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-41/90: Klaus Höfner ja Fritz Elser vs. Macrotron GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:1991:161.
Austria has not submitted any information as to how the aid involved in the agreements at issue would relate to the net development of traffic.
16. novembri 1995. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-244/94: Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances vs. Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, ECLI:EU:C:1995:392; 11. detsembri 1997. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-55/96: Job Centre, ECLI:EU:C:1997:603.
In particular, no indication has been provided as to the start-up costs incurred by Ryanair for launching the Klagenfurt-London route and there is no provision in the 2002 agreements ensuring that the aid granted to Ryanair will be limited to a reasonable fraction of those costs.
16. juuni 1987. aasta otsus kohtuasjas 118/85: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283; 18. juuni 1998. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-35/96: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303.
The Commission therefore considers that the 2002 agreements do not meet the requirement that the aid must be proportional, i.e. the amount must be linked to the net development of traffic.
24. märtsi 2011. aasta otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-443/08 ja T-455/08, Freistaat Sachsen ja Land Sachsen-Anhalt ja Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG ja Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH vs. Euroopa Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2011:117 (eelkõige punktid 93 ja 94); mida kinnitab 19. detsembri 2012. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-288/11 P: Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG ja Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH vs. Euroopa Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2012:821; vt ka 12. detsembri 2000. aasta otsus kohtuasjas T-128/98: Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, mida kinnitab 24. oktoobri 2002. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-82/01 P: Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2002:617; ja 17. detsembri 2008. aasta otsus kohtuasjas T-196/04: Ryanair Ltd vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585.
The Commission considers that the 2002 agreements with Ryanair and its subsidiaries constitute unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market.
17. veebruari 1993. aasta otsused kohtuasjades C-159/91 ja C-160/91: Christian Poucet vs. Assurances générales de France ja Caisse mutuelle régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon ning Pistre vs. Cancave, ECLI:EU:C:1993:63.
The 2006 agreements with Ryanair and AMS — Compatibility assessment pursuant to 2005 Aviation Guidelines
Otsus kohtuasjades Freistaat Sachsen ja Land Sachsen-Anhalt ja Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG ja Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH vs. Euroopa Komisjon (toodud üleval joonealuses märkuses 21), ECLI:EU:T:2011:117 (eelkõige punktid 84 ja 158);
Given that the compatibility conditions for start-up aid enshrined in point 79 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines are cumulative, the Commission considers that it is only necessary to demonstrate that one of those conditions is not fulfilled in order to find that the aid to the airlines is not compatible.
otsus kohtuasjas Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (toodud üleval joonealuses märkuses nr 24, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290), mida kinnitab 24. oktoobri 2002. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-82/01 P: Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2002:617.
The Commission starts its analysis with the condition set out in point 79(d) of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
12. juuli 1984. aasta otsus kohtuasjas 170/83: Hydrotherm Gerätebau GmbH vs. Firma Compact del Dott.
Point 79(d) of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines requires, inter alia, that the amount of aid granted in any one year does not exceed 50 % of total eligible costs for that year and total aid does not exceed an average of 30 % of eligible costs.
Ing.
Eligible costs are defined as the ‘additional start-up costs incurred in launching the new route or frequency […] which the air operator will not have to bear once it is up and running’.
Mario Andreoli & C. Sas, ECLI:EU:C:1984:271 (punkt 11).
In the opening decision the Commission observed that the agreements of 2006 with Ryanair did not provide for any connection between the aid granted and the eligible costs.
Vt ka 14. oktoobri 2004. aasta otsus kohtuasjas T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2004:304 (punkt 50).
Austria was therefore asked to provide details on the relationship between the aid and the eligible costs.
16. detsembri 2010. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-480/09 P: AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA vs. Euroopa Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2010:787 (punktid 47–55); 10. jaanuari 2006. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-222/04: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze vs. Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA ja teised, ECLI:EU:C:2006:8 (punkt 112).
Neither Austria nor the third parties commenting on the opening decision provided any such information.
19. jaanuari 1994. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-364/92: SAT Fluggesellschaft mbH vs. Eurocontrol, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7.
In this light, and considering that the agreements with the airlines in question make no reference to the costs of the airlines, let alone the eligible costs, the Commission finds that the compatibility condition enshrined in point 79(d) of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines is not fulfilled.
16. juuni 1987. aasta otsus kohtuasjas 118/85: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283 (punktid 7 ja 8) ja 4. mai 1988. aasta otsus kohtuasjas 30/87: Corinne Bodson vs. SA Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, ECLI:EU:C:1988:225 (punkt 18).
In conclusion, the aid to Ryanair cannot be found to constitute compatible start-up aid, as at least one of the compatibility conditions is not fulfilled.
18. märtsi 1997. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-343/95: Diego Calì & Figli Srl vs. Servizi ecologici porto di Genova SpA, ECLI:EU:C:1997:160; komisjoni 19. märtsi 2003. aasta otsus N 309/2002; komisjoni 16. oktoobri 2002. aasta otsus N 438/2002 – Abi sadamavaldajatele ametiülesannete täitmiseks (EÜT C 284, 21.11.2002, lk 2).
The Commission considers that the 2006 agreements with Ryanair and its subsidiaries constitute unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market.
Komisjoni 19. märtsi 2003. aasta otsus N 309/2002.
Compatibility assessment pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU
Vt eelkõige 19. jaanuari 1994. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-364/92: SAT Fluggesellschaft mbH vs. Eurocontrol, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7 (punkt 30), ning 26. märtsi 2009. aasta Euroopa Kohtu otsus kohtuasjas C-113/07 P: SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2009:191 (punkt 71).
The compatibility of the 2003 agreement with HLX should be assessed in the light of the abovementioned principles directly on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Vt muu hulgas 3. märtsi 2005. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-172/03: Wolfgang Heiser vs. Finanzamt Innsbruck, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130 (punkt 36), ja viidatud kohtupraktika.
The aid must be limited in time and involve a route likely to become profitable
16. mai 2002. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294.
The Commission notes that, despite its invitation in this respect, Austria has not provided any viability study for the new routes covered by the 2003 agreement to prove that the aid granted through the agreements in question was justified.
12. mai 2011. aasta otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-267/08 ja T-279/08: Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais ja Communauté d'agglomération du Douaisis vs. Euroopa Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2011:209 (punkt 108).
Accordingly, based on the facts on record, it seems that, for the authorities that granted the aid in question, there was no clear prospect of the new routes becoming viable without aid in the more or less short term.
16. mai 2002. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294 (punkt 51 jj).
The Commission stresses in this respect that the explanations submitted by the Austrian authorities on the economic benefits of the routes operated by HLX analyse the impact that they might have on the region's development, but do not include projections of the future viability of these routes operated by HLX.
Ibidem.
Moreover, the Commission notes that, although these measures were limited in time, the 4-year term of the agreement was not necessary for or proportional to the costs incurred in launching a new route given that, in the aviation sector, a contractual term of less than 3 years is usually sufficient.
11. juuli 1996. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-39/94: Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) jt vs. La Poste ja teised, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285 (punkt 60) ja 29. aprilli 1999. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-342/96: Hispaania Kuningriik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210 (punkt 41).
The Commission therefore considers that the 2003 agreement with HLX does not meet the condition that the measures must be limited in time and involve routes likely to become profitable.
2. juuli 1974. aasta otsus kohtuasjas 173/73: Itaalia Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71 (punkt 13).
The Commission considers that the 2003 agreement with HLX constitutes unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market.
16. mai 2002. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294 (punkt 69).
The 2008 agreement with Tuifly — Compatibility assessment pursuant to 2005 Aviation Guidelines
21. märtsi 1991. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-305/89: Itaalia Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:1991:142 (punkt 23).
The Commission observed that the agreement of 2008 with TUIfly did not provide for any connection between the aid granted and the eligible costs.
12. detsembri 2000. aasta otsus kohtuasjas T-296/97: Alitalia - Linee aeree italiane SpA vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2000:289 (punkt 84).
In conclusion, the aid to Tuifly cannot be found to constitute compatible start-up aid, as at least one of the compatibility conditions is not fulfilled.
10. juuli 1986. aasta otsus kohtuasjas 40/85: Belgia Kuningriik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:C:1986:305.
The Commission considers that the 2008 agreement with Tuifly constitutes unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market.
24. juuli 2003. aasta otsus kohtuasjas C-280/00: Altmark Trans GmbH ja Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg vs. Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
CONCLUSION
30. aprilli 1998. aasta otsus kohtuasjas T-214/95: Het Vlaamse Gewest vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:1998:77.
The Commission finds that Austria has unlawfully granted State aid to KFBG in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Vt 2014. aasta lennundussuuniste punkt 53.
However, these subsidies are aid compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Vt 2014. aasta lennundussuuniste punkt 59.
Furthermore, the Commission finds that the airport and marketing services agreements signed between KFBG and Ryanair and its subsidiaries in 2002 and 2006 involve State aid, which was granted in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU and which are aid incompatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Vt komisjoni 27. jaanuari 2010. aasta otsus 2011/60/EL riigiabi C 12/08 (ex NN 74/07) kohta – Slovakkia – Bratislava lennujaama ja Ryanairi vaheline leping (ELT L 27, 1.2.2011, lk 24), põhjendused 88 ja 89.
The Commission also finds that the airport and marketing services agreement signed between KFBG and HLX in 2003 involves State aid, which was granted in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU and which is aid incompatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Kasumlikkuse võrdlusanalüüsi kohta (vastupidiselt hinnakujundusele) selles valdkonnas vt 3. juuli 2014. aasta otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-319/12 ja T-321/12: Hispaania Kuningriik jt vs. Euroopa Komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2014:604 (punkt 44).
The Commission finally finds that the airport and marketing services agreement signed between KFBG/DMG and Tuifly in 2008 involves State aid, which was granted in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU and which is aid incompatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Muud uurimisalused võrdluskriteeriumid on nimetatud 2014. aasta lennundussuuniste punktis 60.
RECOVERY
Vt 2014. aasta lennundussuuniste punkt 59.
According to settled case-law of the Court of Justice, when the Commission has found that aid is incompatible with the internal market, it is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter it.
Vt KFBG nõukogu 167.–173. istungi aruanded (29. juuli 2004, 8. oktoober 2004, 1. detsember 2004, 4. märts 2005, 4. mai 2005, 30. september 2005 ja 12. detsember 2005).
According to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, ‘Where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as a ‘recovery decision’).
Vt KFBG nõukogu aruanded (4. mai 2005 (punkt 5), 1. detsember 2004 (punkt 3), 8. oktoober 2004 (punkt 8) ja 29. juuli 2004 (punkt 7)).
The Commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of Community law’.
Lennuettevalmistuskulusid ei kanna KFBG, kuna neid teenuseid osutab AUA-le KFBG tütarettevõte Tyrolean Airways ning mitte KFBG ise.
According to settled case-law of the Court of Justice, where aid is regarded by the Commission as incompatible with the internal market, the purpose of the obligation imposed on the State is to re-establish the previously existing situation.
Komisjoni 16. novembri 2006. aasta direktiiv 2006/111/EÜ, liikmesriikide ja riigi osalusega äriühingute vaheliste finantssuhete läbipaistvuse ning teatavate ettevõtete finantsläbipaistvuse kohta (ELT L 318, 17.11.2006, lk 17).
In this respect, the Court of Justice considers that the purpose is achieved when beneficiaries have repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage that they enjoyed over competitors.
Vt nt Kärnteni liidumaa valitsuse 29. jaanuari 2002. aasta koosoleku protokoll (lk 1–5).
In this way, the situation prior to payment of the aid is restored.
Vt nt vastus Ryanairi 4. juuli 2011. aasta märkuste neljandale küsimusele.
In this case, it appears that no general principle of Union law prevents recovery of the unlawful and incompatible aid identified in this Decision.
4. augusti 2005. aasta e-kiri, kell 18.22, saatja: Sean Coyle (Ryanair), saaja: Johannes Gatterer (KFBG).
In particular, neither Austria nor the interested third parties have presented any arguments in this respect.
Täituvus või koormustegur on kõnealuse lennuliini käitamisel õhusõidukis täidetud kohtade osakaal.
Austria must therefore take all necessary measures to recover from Ryanair and its subsidiaries, HLX and Tuifly the unlawful aid granted through the agreements in question.
Vt AMSi märkused põhjenduses 184.
Determination of the aid amounts
AMS väidab, et tema teenuste hinnad vastavad turuhinnale, kuna AMSiga on turunduslepingu sõlminud ka mitu erinevatest majandusharudest pärinevat eraklienti.