natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(e.g. mm/yyyy)
ühte või mitut tüüpi esindavate sõidukite suurim arv võib M1-kategooria korral olla kuni 10 % ja kõigi muude kategooriate korral kuni 30 % eelmisel aastal kõnesolevas liikmesriigis kasutusele võetud vastavat tüüpi sõidukite arvust.
An approval authority may also accept the manufacturer's certification to standards EN ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/TS16949:2009 (the scope of that certification shall in that case cover the product(s) to be approved), or an equivalent certification standard as satisfying the initial assessment requirements of point 2.3., provided that conformity of production is indeed covered by the quality management system and that the manufacturer's type-approval has not been withdrawn as referred to in point 2.3.1.1.(c).
Kui nimetatud 10 % või vastavalt 30 % moodustab vähem kui 100 sõidukit, võib liikmesriik lubada maksimaalselt 100 sõiduki kasutuselevõttu;
The manufacturer shall provide details of the certification and inform the approval authority of any revisions to its validity or scope.
igasse üksiktüüpi kuuluvate sõidukite piirarvuks on sõidukite arv, millele sõiduki valmistamispäeval või pärast seda anti vastavustunnistus, mis kehtis vähemalt kolm kuud väljaandmise kuupäevast alates, kuid mille kehtivus lõppes õigusakti jõustumise tõttu.
For the purpose of vehicle type-approval, the initial assessments carried out for the granting of type-approvals for systems, components and separate technical units of the vehicle need not be repeated, but shall be completed by an assessment of the locations and activities relating to the assembly of the whole vehicle that have not been covered by the initial assessments.
VI LISA
Product conformity arrangements
SÕIDUKI TURVALISUSE VÕI KESKKONNAMÕJU SEISUKOHALT OLULISTE SÜSTEEMIDE NÕUETEKOHAST TOIMIMIST TÕSISELT OHUSTADA VÕIVATE TARVIKUTE JA LISASEADMETE LOETELU, NENDE TARVIKUTE JA LISASEADMETE TÕHUSUSNÕUDED, NÕUETEKOHASED KATSEMENETLUSED NING MÄRGISTUS- JA PAKENDAMISNÕUDED
Every vehicle, system, component or separate technical unit, part or item of equipment approved pursuant to a UN Regulation annexed to the Revised 1958 Agreement and to this Regulation shall be so manufactured as to conform to the type approved by meeting the requirements of this Annex, the said UN Regulation and this Regulation.
I. Sõiduki turvalisust märkimisväärselt mõjutavad tarvikud või lisaseadmed
Before granting a type-approval pursuant to this Regulation and to a UN Regulation annexed to the Revised 1958 Agreement, the approval authority shall verify the existence of adequate product conformity arrangements and documented control plans, to be agreed with the manufacturer for each approval, to carry out at specified intervals the tests or associated checks that are necessary to verify continued conformity with the approved type, including, where applicable, tests specified in this Regulation and the said UN Regulation.
Detail nr
The holder of the type-approval shall, in particular:
Osa kirjeldus
ensure the existence and application of procedures for effective control of the conformity of vehicles, systems, components, separate technical units, parts or equipment to the approved type;
Toimivusnõue
have access to the testing or other appropriate equipment necessary for checking the conformity to each approved type;
Katsemenetlus
ensure that the data resulting from tests or checks are recorded and that annexed documents remain available for a period of up to 10 years to be determined in agreement with the approval authority;
Märgistusnõue
analyse the results of each type of test or check, in order to verify and ensure the stability of the product characteristics, making allowance for variation of an industrial production;
Pakendamisnõuded
ensure that for each type of product, at least the checks prescribed in this Regulation and the tests prescribed in the relevant regulatory acts listed in Annex II are carried out;
Sõiduki keskkonnatoimet märkimisväärselt mõjutavad tarvikud või lisaseadmed
ensure that any set of samples or test pieces that gives evidence of non-conformity in the type of test in question, gives rise to a further sampling and testing.
VII LISA
All the necessary steps shall be taken to restore the production process to ensure conformity with the approved type.
ÕIGUSAKTID, MILLE PUHUL VÕIB TEHNILISEKS TEENISTUSEKS MÄÄRATA TOOTJA
In the case of step-by-step, mixed or multi-stage type-approvals, the approval authority that is granting a whole-vehicle type-approval may request from any approval authority that has granted type-approval of any relevant system, component or separate technical unit specific details regarding compliance with the conformity of production requirements set out in this Annex.
Käesolevas lisas kehtestatakse loetelu õigusaktidest, mille puhul võib kooskõlas artikli 72 lõikega 1 määrata tehniliseks teenistuseks tootja ettevõttesisene tehniline teenistus.
The approval authority that is granting a whole-vehicle type-approval and is not satisfied with the reported information referred to in point 3.4., and that has communicated this in writing to the relevant manufacturer and to the approval authority granting the type-approval for the system, component or separate technical unit, shall request the performance of additional conformity of production audits or checks, which shall be performed at the site of the manufacturer(s) of those systems, components or separate technical units.
Samuti sisaldab see asjakohaseid sätteid tootja ettevõttesisese tehnilise teenistuse määramise kohta tehniliseks teenistuseks, mida tuleb kohaldada tüübikinnituse andmisel II lisa I osaga hõlmatud sõidukitele, osadele ja eraldi seadmestikele.
The results of this additional conformity of production audits or checks shall immediately be made available to that approval authority.
Siiski ei kohaldata seda lisa nende tootjate suhtes, kes taotlevad ELi tüübikinnitust väikeseeria sõidukitele, nagu on osutatud artiklis 41.
Where points 3.4. and 3.5. apply and the approval authority granting the whole-vehicle type-approval has not been satisfied with the additional audit or check results, the manufacturer shall ensure that conformity of production is restored as soon as possible to the satisfaction of that approval authority and of the approval authority granting type-approval of the system, component or separate technical unit.
Tootja ettevõttesisese tehnilise teenistuse määramine tehniliseks teenistuseks
Continued verification arrangements
Tehniliseks teenistuseks määratud tootja tehniline teenistus on tootja, kelle tüübikinnitusasutus on määranud selle asutuse nimel tüübikinnituskatseid tegevaks katselaboratooriumiks.
The approval authority that has granted type-approval may at any time verify the conformity control methods applied in each production facility by means of periodic audits.
Väljend „katseid tegema“ ei ole piiratud töötulemuste mõõtmisega, vaid hõlmab ka katsetulemuste registreerimist ning aruande, sealhulgas asjakohaste järelduste esitamist tüübikinnitusasutusele.
The manufacturer shall for that purpose allow access to that authority to the manufacturing, inspection, testing, storage and distribution sites and shall provide all necessary information with regard to the quality management system documentation and records.
See hõlmab ka sellistele sätetele vastavuse kontrollimist, mis ei eelda mõõtmisi.
The normal arrangements for such periodic audits shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in points 2 and 3 (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements).
Näiteks võib tuua toote konstruktsiooni õigusaktidele vastavuse hindamise.
Surveillance activities carried out by the technical services (qualified or recognised as required in point 2.3.3) shall be accepted as satisfying the requirement of point 4.1.1 with regard to the procedures established at initial assessment.
Õigusaktide ja piirangute loetelu
The normal frequency of verifications by the approval authority (other than those referred to in point 4.1.1.1) shall be such as to ensure that the relevant controls applied in accordance with points 2 and 3 are reviewed at intervals based on a risk assessment methodology that complies with the international standard ISO 31000:2018 – Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines, and such verification shall in any case be conducted at least once every three years.
Välja arvatud 8. lisas esitatud sätted veeldatud naftagaasi leeksoojendite ja veeldatud naftagaasi küttesüsteemide kohta
This methodology shall in particular take into account any non-conformity raised by other Member States in the context of Article 54(1).
Piiratud 21. lisa sätetega
At every review, records of tests or checks and records of production, in particular records of those tests or checks documented as required in point 2.2, shall be made available to the inspector.
Piiratud 5. lisa (kuni ja kaasa arvatud punkt 8) ja 7. lisa sätetega
The inspector may select samples at random manner to be tested in the manufacturer's laboratory or in the facilities of the technical service.
Liide
In such a case only physical test shall be carried out.
Tootja ettevõttesisese tehnilise teenistuse määramine tehniliseks teenistuseks ja sellest teavitamine toimub kooskõlas artiklitega 68–81 ning igasugune alltöövõtt toimub käesoleva liite kohaselt.
The minimum number of samples may be determined on the basis of the results of the manufacturer's own verification.
Allhanked
The inspector who is of the opinion that the level of control is unsatisfactory, or who deems it necessary to verify the validity of the tests carried out in accordance with point 4.2, shall select samples to be sent to a technical service to perform physical tests in accordance with the requirements on conformity of production, set out in the regulatory acts listed in Annex II.
Artikli 71 lõike 1 kohaselt võib tehniline teenistus määrata enda nimel katseid tegema alltöövõtja.
Where unsatisfactory results are found during an inspection or a monitoring review, the approval authority shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the manufacturer restores the conformity of production as rapidly as possible.
Käesoleva liite kohaldamisel on: „alltöövõtja“ – tehnilise teenistuse tütarettevõtja, kellele see tehniline teenistus on oma organisatsiooni raames usaldanud katsete tegemise, või kolmas isik, kellega tehniline teenistus on katsete tegemiseks lepingu sõlminud.
In cases where compliance with UN Regulations is required by this Regulation, the manufacturer may choose to apply this Annex as an equivalent alternative to the conformity of production requirements in the respective UN Regulations.
Alltöövõtja poole pöördumine ei vabasta tehnilist teenistust kohustusest järgida artiklite 69, 70, 80 ja 81 sätteid, eelkõige neid, mis käsitlevad tehniliste teenistuste oskusi ja vastavust standardile EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005.
However, if points 4.4. or 4.5. apply, all separate conformity of production requirements in the UN Regulations have to be complied with to the satisfaction of the approval authority until it decides that conformity of production has been restored.
VII lisa punkti 2 kohaldatakse alltöövõtja suhtes.
ANNEX V
Katsearuanne
SMALL SERIES AND END-OF-SERIES LIMITS
Katsearuanne koostatakse kooskõlas artikli 30 lõikes 2 osutatud rakendusaktiga.
A. SMALL SERIES QUANTITIVE ANNUAL LIMITS
VIII LISA
The number of units of one type of vehicle to be registered, made available on the market or entered into service annually in the Union shall not exceed, pursuant to Article 41, the quantitive annual limits shown in the following table for the vehicle category in question:
VIRTUAALSETE KATSEMEETODITE KASUTAMISE TINGIMUSED TOOTJALE VÕI TEHNILISELE TEENISTUSELE
Category
Käesolevas lisas esitatakse virtuaalseid katsemeetodeid käsitlevad sätted kooskõlas artikli 30 lõikega 7.
0 until the date of application of the delegated acts referred to in Article 41(5).
Õigusaktide loetelu
1500 after that date
Virtuaalse katse struktuur
The number of units of one type of vehicle to be registered, made available on the market or entered into service annually in a Member State, shall be determined by that Member State but shall not exceed, pursuant to Article 42, the quantitative annual limits shown in the following table for the vehicle category in question:
Virtuaalsete katsete kirjeldamisel ja tegemisel peab lähtuma järgmisest põhistruktuurist:
B. END-OF-SERIES LIMITS
eesmärk,
The maximum number of complete and completed vehicles entered into service in each Member State under the procedure ‘End-of-Series’ shall be restricted in one of the following ways to be chosen by the Member State:
struktuuri mudel,
The maximum number of vehicles of one or more types may, in the case of category M1, not exceed 10 % and in the case of all other categories not exceed 30 % of the vehicles of all types concerned entered into service in that Member State during the previous year.
piirtingimused,
Should 10 %, respectively 30 %, be less than 100 vehicles, then the Member State may allow the entry into service of a maximum of 100 vehicles.
eeldatav koormus,
Vehicles of any one type shall be restricted to those for which a valid certificate of conformity was issued on or after the date of manufacture of the vehicle and which remained valid for at least three months after its date of issue but subsequently lost its validity due to the entry into force of a regulatory act.
arvutused,
ANNEX VI
hinnang,
LIST OF PARTS OR EQUIPMENT THAT MAY POSE A SERIOUS RISK TO THE CORRECT FUNCTIONING OF SYSTEMS THAT ARE ESSENTIAL FOR THE SAFETY OF THE VEHICLE OR ITS ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE, THE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH PARTS AND EQUIPMENT, THE APPROPRIATE TEST PROCEDURES, AND MARKING AND PACKAGING PROVISIONS
dokumentatsioon.
I. Parts or equipment having a significant impact on vehicle safety
Arvutisimulatsiooni ja arvutuste alused
Item No
Matemaatiline mudel
Item description
Matemaatilise mudeli esitab tootja.
Performance requirement
See kajastab katsetatava sõiduki, süsteemi, osa või eraldi seadmestiku konstruktsiooni keerukust koos asjaomase õigusakti nõuetega ja selle piirtingimustega.
Test procedure
Samad sätted on kohaldatavad osade või eraldi seadmestike katsetamise korral sõidukist eraldi.
Marking requirement
Matemaatilise mudeli valideerimise menetlus
Packaging requirements
Matemaatiline mudel tuleb valideerida võrdluses tegelike katsetingimustega.
Parts or equipment having a significant impact on the environmental performance of the vehicle
Selleks tuleb teha füüsiline katse, et võrrelda matemaatilist mudelit kasutades saadud tulemusi füüsilise katse tulemustega.
ANNEX VII
Katsetulemuste võrreldavust tuleb tõestada.
REGULATORY ACTS FOR WHICH A MANUFACTURER MAY BE DESIGNATED AS A TECHNICAL SERVICE
Tootja või tehniline teenistus koostab valideerimisaruande ja esitab selle tüübikinnitusasutusele.
This Annex lays down the list of the regulatory acts for which an in-house technical service of a manufacturer may be designated as a technical service in accordance with Article 72(1).
Kõigist matemaatilises mudelis või tarkvaras tehtud muudatustest, mis võivad valideerimisaruande kehtetuks muuta, tuleb teatada tüübikinnitusasutusele, kes võib nõuda uue valideerimise tegemist.
It also includes appropriate provisions concerning the designation of an in-house technical service of a manufacturer as technical service, to be applied in the framework of the type-approval of vehicles, components and separate technical units concerned by Part I of Annex II.
Valideerimismenetluse skeem on esitatud 3. liites.
This Annex however does not apply to manufacturers who apply for the EU type-approval of vehicles produced in small series, as referred to in Article 41.
Dokumentatsioon
Designation of an in-house technical service of a manufacturer as a technical service
Tootja teeb tehnilisele teenistusele kättesaadavaks ja dokumenteerib simulatsiooniks ja arvutusteks kasutatavad andmed ning lisavahendid.
An in-house technical service of a manufacturer designated as a technical service is a manufacturer which has been designated by the type-approval authority as a testing laboratory to carry out on its behalf the approval tests.
Vahendid ja tugi
The expression ‘to carry out tests’ is not restricted to the measurement of performances, but also covers the registration of test results and the submission to the type-approval authority of a report, including the relevant conclusions.
Tehnilise teenistuse taotlusel esitab tootja vajalikud vahendid virtuaalsete katsete tegemiseks, sealhulgas asjakohase tarkvara, või võimaldab neile juurdepääsu.
It also covers the checking of compliance with those provisions that do not necessarily require measurement.
Lisaks pakub tootja tehnilisele teenistusele asjakohast tuge.
This is the case for the assessment whether the design complies with the legislative requirements.
Tehnilisele teenistusele juurdepääsu ja toe võimaldamine ei vabasta tehnilist teenistust kohustustest seoses personali oskuste, litsentsitasude maksmise ja konfidentsiaalsusnõudega.
List of regulatory acts and restrictions
Lisa ja punktid
Except the provisions in Annex 8 relating to LPG combustion heaters and LPG heating systems
Eritingimused
Restricted to the provisions included in Annex 21
ÜRO eeskirja nr 58 punktid 2.3, 7.3 ja 25.6.
Restricted to the provisions included in Annex 5 (up to and including paragraph 8) and Annex 7
Mõõtmed ja jõule vastupidavus.
Appendix
Määruse (EL) nr 130/2012 II lisa 1. ja 2. osa.
The designation and notification of an in-house technical service of a manufacturer as a technical service shall be made in accordance with Articles 68 to 81 and any subcontracting shall be done in accordance with this Appendix.
Astmete, astmelaudade ja käepidemete mõõtmed.
Subcontracting
ÜRO eeskirja nr 11 3. lisa.
In accordance with Article 71(1), a technical service may nominate a subcontractor for performing tests on his behalf.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 11 4. lisa punkt 2.1.
For the purposes of this Appendix ‘Subcontractor’ means either a subsidiary of the technical service that has been entrusted by that technical service with testing activities inside its own organisation or a third party under contract with that technical service to perform test activities.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 11 5. lisa.
The use of the services of a subcontractor does not release the technical service from its obligation to comply with Articles 69, 70, 80 and 81, and in particular with those concerning the skills of the technical services and compliance with Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005.
Tõmbetugevuse katsete ja sulgurite kiirendustakistus.
Point 2 of Annex VII shall apply to the subcontractor.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 46 punkt 15.2.4.
Test report
Tahavaatepeegli ettenähtud vaateväljad.
Test reports shall be drafted in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in Article 30(3).
ÜRO eeskirja nr 21 punkt 5–5.7.
ANNEX VIII
Kõigi kumerusraadiuste ja väljaulatuvate osade mõõtmine, välja arvatud nõuded, kus tuleb sätetele vastavuse kontrollimiseks rakendada jõudu.
CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF VIRTUAL TESTING METHODS BY A MANUFACTURER OR A TECHNICAL SERVICE
ÜRO eeskirja nr 21 punkt 2.3.
This Annex lays down provisions concerning virtual testing in accordance with Article 30(7).
Peaga kokkupõrke tsooni kindlaksmääramine.
List of regulatory acts
ÜRO eeskirja nr 26 punkt 5.2.4.
Virtual test pattern
Kõik sätted ÜRO eeskirja nr 26 punktides 5 (Üldnõuded) ja 6 (Erinõuded).
The following scheme shall be used as basis structure for describing and conducting virtual testing:
Punkt 6 (Erinõuded) ning ÜRO eeskirja nr 48 4., 5. ja 6. lisa
purpose;
Punktis 6.22.9.2.2 ettenähtud katsesõit sooritatakse reaalse sõidukiga.
structure model;
Määruse (EL) nr 1005/2010 II lisa punkt 1.2.
boundary conditions;
Staatiline tõmbe- ja survejõud.
load assumptions;
ÜRO eeskirja nr 125 punkt 5 (Spetsifikatsioonid).
calculation;
Takistused ja vaateväli.
assessment;
Määruse (EL) nr 1008/2010 III lisa punktid 1.1.2 ja 1.1.3.
documentation.
Üksnes puhastatava ala määramine.
Fundamentals of computer simulation and calculation
Määruse (EL) nr 1009/2010 II lisa punkt 2.
Mathematical model
Mõõtmisnõuete vastavustõendamine.
It shall reflect the complexity of the structure of the vehicle, system, component or separate technical unit to be tested in relation to the requirements of the relevant regulatory act and its boundary conditions.
Horisontaalsele jõule vastupidavuse ja läbipainde mõõtmine.
The same provisions shall apply for testing components or separate technical units independently from the vehicle.
Määruse (EL) nr 1230/2012 I lisa B osa punktid 7 ja 8.
Validation process of the mathematical model
Manööverdusvõime nõuetele vastavuskontroll, sealhulgas ülestõstetud asendis või koormatavate telgedega varustatud sõidukite manööverdusvõime.
The mathematical model shall be validated against the actual test conditions.
Määruse (EL) nr 1230/2012 I lisa C osa punktid 6 ja 7.
To that effect a physical test shall be conducted to compare the results obtained when using the mathematical model with the results of a physical test.
Suurima tagumise väljapöörde mõõtmine.
Comparability of the test results shall be proven.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 61 punktid 5 ja 6.
The manufacturer or the technical service shall draft a validation report and submit it to the approval authority.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 55 5. lisa „Mehaanilistele haakeseadistele esitatavad nõuded“.
Any change to the mathematical model or to the software that is likely to invalidate the validation report shall be brought to the attention of the approval authority, which may require that a new validation process is conducted.
Hõlmatud on punktide 1–8 sätted
The flow chart of the validation process is shown in Appendix 3.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 55 6. lisa punkt 1.1.
Documentation
Lihtsa konstruktsiooniga mehaaniliste haakeseadiste tugevuskatsed võib asendada virtuaalsete katsetega.
The manufacturer shall make available to the technical service and document the data and auxiliary tools used for simulation and calculation.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 55 6. lisa punkt 3.
Tools and support
Üksnes punktid 3.6.1.
The manufacturer shall also provide appropriate support to the technical service.
Punkt 7.4.5.
The access and support provided by the manufacturer to a technical service does not exempt the technical service from its obligations regarding the skills of its personnel, the payment of licence rights and confidentiality.
(arvutusmeetod).
Annex and paragraphs
ÜRO eeskirja nr 66 9. lisa.
Specific conditions
Komplekteeritud sõiduki ümberminekukatse arvutisimulatsioon samaväärse kinnitusmeetodina
Paragraphs 2.3, 7.3. and 25.6 of UN Regulation No 58.
ÜRO eeskirja nr 93 5. lisa punkt 3.
Dimensions and resistance to forces.
Tüübikinnitusasutus
Annex II, Part 1 and 2 of Regulation (EU) No 130/2012.
Tehniline aruanne vastavalt õigusaktile
Dimensions of steps, running boards and handholds.
Arvutisimulatsioon
Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 UN Regulation No 11
Virtuaalsed prototüübid I, II jne
Annex 3 of UN Regulation No 11.
Tüübikinnitusmenetlus
Annex 4, paragraph 2.1. of UN Regulation No 11.
Tüübikinnitusasutuse heakskiit
Annex 5 of UN Regulation No 11.
Valideerimisaruanne
Tensile strength tests and resistance of latches to acceleration.
Füüsiline katse
Paragraph 15.2.4. of UN Regulation No 46.
Füüsiline prototüüp
Prescribed fields of vision of rear-view mirrors.
Tootja
Paragraphs 5. to 5.7. of UN Regulation No 21.
IX LISA
Measurement of all radii of curvature and of all projections except for those requirements where a force has to be applied in order to check compliance with the provisions.
MITMEASTMELINE TÜÜBIKINNITUSMENETLUS
Paragraph 2.3. of UN Regulation No 21.
Tootjate kohustused
Determination of the head-impact zone.
Mitmeastmelise tüübikinnitusmenetluse edukaks toimimiseks on vajalik kõigi asjaomaste tootjate ühine tegevus.
Paragraph 5.2.4. of UN Regulation No 26
Selleks peavad tüübikinnitusasutused enne esimese astme ja edasiste astmete tüübikinnitus(t)e andmist veenduma, et asjaomaste tootjate vahel on olemas kohased kokkulepped dokumentide ja teabe edastamise ja omavahelise vahetamise osas, tagamaks komplekteeritud sõiduki tüübi vastavust kõigi II lisas loetletud õigusaktide nõuetele.