natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is demonstrated by a number of Court decisions relating to the seizure of property, the decision of the investigating judge of 22 November 2017 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia, by the prosecutor's instructions of 2 January 2018 to the investigator to notify the suspects and their defence lawyers of the completion of the pre-trial investigation and by the fact that on 8 May 2018 the indictment was referred to the Sviatoshynskyi District Court of Kiev for consideration on the merits.
Seda näitavad eelkõige mitu vara arestimist käsitlevat kohtuotsust, eeluurimiskohtuniku 22. novembri 2017. aasta otsus anda luba erakorraliseks tagaseljauurimiseks, prokuröri 2. jaanuari 2018. aastal antud juhised uurijale teavitada kahtlustatavaid ja nende kaitsjaid kohtueelse uurimise lõpetamisest ning asjaolu, et 8. mail 2018. aastal edastati süüdistus selle sisu uurimiseks Kiievi Sviatoshynskyi ringkonnakohtule.
The information also shows that there was no previous valid decision of the prosecution not to launch a criminal investigation, and that the relevant criminal proceedings therefore did not infringe the principle of ne bis in idem.’
Lisaks nähtub edastatud teabest, et puudus varasem prokuratuuri kehtiv otsus mitte algatada kriminaaluurimist, mistõttu ei rikutud asjaomaste kriminaalmenetlusega ne bis in idem põhimõtet.“
Commission Decision (EU) 2019/367
Komisjoni otsus (EL) 2019/367,
on the measure SA.35065 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN, 2012/FC) implemented by the United Kingdom for MMD Shipping Services Ltd
meetme SA.35065 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN, 2012/FC) kohta, mida Ühendkuningriik on rakendanud äriühingu MMD Shipping Services Ltd suhtes
(notified under document C(2018) 7360)
(teatavaks tehtud numbri C(2018) 7360 all)
On 10 April 2013, the Commission received a complaint alleging unlawful aid provided by Portsmouth City Council (‘PCC’) to MMD Shipping Services Ltd (‘MMD’).
Komisjon sai 10. aprillil 2013 kaebuse, kus väideti, et Portsmouthi linna volikogu (edaspidi „Portsmouth“) on andnud ettevõttele MMD Shipping Services Ltd. (edaspidi „MMD“) ebaseaduslikku riigiabi.
The submission of a formal complaint was preceded by an informal submission by the complainant of 8 June 2012 and a meeting of 29 November 2012.
Ametlikule kaebusele eelnes mitteametlik kaebus 8. juunil 2012 ja kohtumine 29. novembril 2012.
The United Kingdom provided their comments on 1 July 2013.
Komisjon kohtus kaebuse esitajaga 10. aprillil 2014 ja saatis 16. aprillil talle märkuste esitamiseks Ühendkuningriigi märkuste mittekonfidentsiaalse versiooni.
On 10 October 2013, the Commission sent a request for additional detailed information about the measures alleged.
Kaebuse esitaja saatis märkused 12. novembril 2014.
The United Kingdom replied on 25 November 2013 and 9 December 2013.
19. septembri 2016. aasta kirjaga andis komisjon Ühendkuningriigile teada otsusest algatada kõnealuse meetme suhtes Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõikes 2 sätestatud menetlus.
The Commission met with the complainant on 10 April 2014, and, on 16 April 2014 sent a non-confidential version of the United Kingdom submissions to the complainant for their comments.
Ühendkuningriik esitas komisjoni menetluse algatamise otsuse kohta märkused 21. novembri 2016. aasta kirjas.
The complainant provided comments on 12 November 2014.
Komisjoni otsus algatada menetlus (edaspidi „algatamisotsus“) avaldati Euroopa Liidu Teatajas.
By letter dated 19 September 2016, the Commission notified the United Kingdom of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of the measure.
Komisjon kutsus huvitatud isikuid üles esitama meetmete kohta märkusi.
The United Kingdom provided observations on the Commission decision to initiate the procedure by letter dated 21 November 2016.
Komisjon sai märkusi kahelt huvitatud isikult, kellest üks oli kaebuse esitaja ja teine anonüümne huvitatud isik.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure (‘the Opening Decision’) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Need edastati Ühendkuningriigile vastamiseks 21. jaanuaril 2017.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Ühendkuningriigi märkused saadi 15. veebruari 2017. aasta kirjas.
The Commission received comments from two interested parties the complainant and an Anonymous Interested Party.
26. aprillil 2017 toimus Ühendkuningriigi ja komisjoni kokkusaamine.
It forwarded them to the United Kingdom on 21 January 2017, and the United Kingdom was given the opportunity to respond.
Pärast seda esitas Ühendkuningriik lisateabe 12. jaanuari 2018. aasta kirjas.
Comments were received from the United Kingdom by letter dated 15 February 2017.
18. aprillil 2018 toimus komisjoni ja Ühendkuningriigi telefonivestlus, pärast mida esitas Ühendkuningriik 5. ja 22. juuni 2018. aasta kirjas lisateavet.
On 26 April 2017, the Commission held a meeting with the United Kingdom.
MEETME ÜKSIKASJALIK KIRJELDUS
Following this meeting, the United Kingdom submitted additional information by letter dated 12 January 2018.
Abisaaja
On 18 April 2018, the Commission held a telephone conference with the United Kingdom, following which the United Kingdom submitted additional information by letters dated 5 June and 22 June 2018.
MMD on alates 2008. aastast täielikult Portsmouthi omandis olev tütarettevõte, kes osutab kaubakäitlusteenuseid (peamiselt puuviljade ja muude värskete aedviljade stividoriteenus, ladustamine ja laialivedamine) Portsmouthi rahvusvahelises sadamas (edaspidi „sadam“), mis kuulub samuti Portsmouthile, kes seda ka käitab.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
MMD on sadama peamine kaubakäitleja, kellel on pikaajaline peamiste kaubakäitluskaide rendileping.
Recipient
Sadama teised tegevused on seotud veeremiparv- ja kruiisilaevadega.
As of 2008 MMD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PCC and provides cargo-handling services (stevedoring, warehousing and distribution of mainly fruit and other fresh produce) to customers at Portsmouth International Port (‘the Port’), which is also owned and operated by PCC.
MMD aastakäive on umbes 15 miljonit Inglise naela ja töötajaid on sel peaaegu 200.
MMD is the principal cargo handling operator in the Port with a long-term lease for the main cargo handling quays.
Enne seda, kui Portsmouth MMD omandas, oli äriühing kahjumis vähemalt alates 2002/2003. majandusaastast.
Other operations of the Port relate to roll-on, roll-off ferry services and cruise ships.
Meetmed, mille kaebuse esitaja väidab olevat riigiabi
Prior to PCC's acquisition of MMD, MMD had been loss-making at least since the 2002/2003 financial year.
Need meetmed on järgmised:
Following its acquisition by PCC in 2008, the financial results of MMD were largely balanced thanks to the annual revenue grants provided by PCC, and without which MMD would have recorded an operating loss between 2008 and 2016.
meede – Portsmouth omandas MMD 2008. aastal;
The financial year 2016/2017 was the first year that MMD recorded a profit without any revenue grant from PCC (see Table 1).
meede – Portsmouth maksis MMD-le igal aastal tulutoetust;
Alleged State aid measures raised by the Complainant
meede – Portsmouth andis MMD-le 2010. aastal pikaajalise laenulimiidi;
The Complainant in its 2013 complaint identified a number of measures which it alleged constituted illegal and incompatible State aid by PCC to MMD.
meede – Portsmouth omandas 2010. ja 2011. aastal kaks kraanat ning liisis need pikaks ajaks MMD-le;
The alleged aid measures include:
meede – Portsmouth andis MMD-le arvelduskrediidi tagatise.
Measure 1: Acquisition of MMD by PCC in 2008 (‘Measure 1’);
Algses kaebuses väideti, et Portsmouth ei tegutsenud turumajandusliku investori põhimõttel, kui omandas kahjumit tootva ettevõtte ja toetas seda rahaliselt ka siis, kui see jätkas kahjumlikku tegevust ka pärast selle omandamist 2008. aastal.
Measure 2: Revenue grants provided annually by PCC to MMD (‘Measure 2’);
Kaebuse esitaja hinnangul oli Portsmouthi abi MMD-le 2014. aasta novembri seisuga 17,3 miljonit naela.
Measure 3: Long-term loan facility provided by PCC to MMD as of 2010 (‘Measure 3’);
Portsmouthi jätkuva abita ei oleks MMD turul ellu jäänud.
Measure 4: Acquisition of two cranes by PCC and their subsequent long-term lease to MMD in 2010 and 2011 (‘Measure 4’);
Seega andis Portsmouthi pidev abi kaebuse esitaja sõnul MMD-le märkimisväärse majandusliku eelise ning MMD sai pakkuda olemasolevatele ja potentsiaalsetele klientidele kaubakäitlusteenuseid soodushinnaga.
Measure: 5: Security for overdraft facility (‘Measure 5’).
See väidetavalt moonutas imporditud värskete aedviljade käitlemise ja ladustamise turgu.
The original complaint argued generally that PCC did not act in line with the market economy investor principle (‘MEIP’) by acquiring and financially supporting a loss-making business despite its continued losses since 2008.
meede – Portsmouth omandas MMD 2008. aastal
The complaint estimated that the overall support provided by PCC to MMD would as at November 2014 amount to GBP 17,3 million.
Portsmouth ostis MMD varasemalt eraomanikult 2,07 miljoni naela eest.
Without the continued support from PCC, MMD would have not been able to survive on the market.
Alginvesteeringu osana tegi Portsmouth MMD-sse ka täiendavaid kapitaliinvesteeringuid summas 2,34 miljonit naela, mis olid kapitalitoetuse vormis, ning kavandas katta MMD kahjumi majandusaastatel 2008/2009 ja 2009/2010 kogusummas 1,443 miljonit naela.
Thus, according to the Complainant, PCC's continued support using public funds provided a significant economic advantage to MMD and allowed MMD to offer discounted cargo handling rates to its existing and potential customers.
Vastupidi kaebuse esitaja väidetele jõudis komisjon algatamisotsuses järeldusele, et Portsmouth tegutses MMD sellistel tingimustel omandamisel kooskõlas turumajandusliku investori põhimõttega, mistõttu ei anna 1. meede MMD-le mingit majanduslikku eelist ega ole riigiabi.
As a result, the competition in the market for handling and storage of imported fresh produce was allegedly distorted.
Peale selle ei esitanud ei kaebuse esitaja ega anonüümne huvitatud isik 1. meetme kohta ühtegi lisaväidet ega -tõendit.
Measure 1: Acquisition of MMD by PCC in 2008
Seetõttu käesolevas otsuses 1. meedet ei käsitleta.
PCC acquired MMD from a previous private owner for a price of GBP 2,07 million.
meede – Portsmouth maksis MMD-le igal aastal tulutoetust
As part of the initial investment, PCC also funded MMD with additional capital investments of GBP 2,34 million in the form of capital grants and planned to cover the losses of MMD in the financial years 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 with total funds of GBP 1,443 million.
2008. aastal toimunud omandamisest peale on Portsmouth maksnud MMD-le tulutoetust, mis oli ettevõtte raamatupidamisse kantud muu tegevustuluna ja suurendas nii tegevuskasumit (st vähendas kahjumit).
Despite the claims of the Complainant, the Commission concluded in the Opening Decision that PCC acted in line with the MEIP by acquiring MMD under these conditions and therefore Measure 1 does not provide any economic advantage to MMD and does not constitute State aid.
Algse investeerimiskava kohaselt oli plaanis katta MMD kahjud vaid kahel esimesel aastal ja kuni 1,443 miljoni naela ulatuses.
In addition, neither the Complainant nor the Anonymous Interested Party provided any additional arguments or evidence with respect to Measure 1.
Ent Portsmouth jätkas tulutoetuse maksmist ka pärast 2009/2010. majandusaastat ning tegi seda kuni 2016. aastani summas 16,71 miljonit naela (vt tabel 1).
In view of that, Measure 1 is not assessed in this Decision.
Majandusaastal 2016/2017 tulutoetust ei makstud ja MMD jõudis kasumisse.
Measure 2: Revenue grants provided annually by PCC to MMD
Tabel 1
Since the acquisition in 2008, PCC has provided MMD with revenue grants in the form of cash transfers recorded as ‘other operating income’, thus increasing the operating profits (and thereby reducing operating losses).
Portsmouthilt MMD-le makstud tulutoetus ja MMD kasum/kahjum majandusaastatel 2008/2009–2016/2017
The original investment case envisaged the need to cover MMD's losses only in the first two years and for a total amount limited to GBP 1,443 million.
(miljonites naelades)
However, PCC continued to provide revenue grants after the 2009/2010 financial year and the total amount of revenue grants provided up to 2016 reached GBP 16,71 million (see Table 1 below).
Tegevuskasum (tulutoetuseta)
No revenue grant was provided in the financial year 2016/2017 and MMD recorded a profit in that year.
Kogukasum (tulutoetuseta)
13/14
Laenulimiidi üldtingimused on kirjas Portsmouthi ja MMD vahel sõlmitud kommertslaenulepingus ning iga kasutuskorra jaoks tuleb esitada lisadokumente (teave kapitalimahutuse kohta, milleks laenuraha kasutatakse, MMD ja Portsmouthi finantshinnang laenule ning tagatisdokumendid).
14/15
Aastatel 2010–2017 kasutas MMD laenulimiiti kogusummas 5,7 miljonit naela.
15/16
Kaebuse esitaja väitel tagas Portsmouthi antud laenulimiit MMD-le pikaajalise rahastuse tingimustel, mida tavalistelt kommertslaenude andjatelt poleks saadud.
Operating profit (excl. revenue grants)
Samuti väidab ta, et Portsmouthi ja MMD vaheline laenuleping ei ole allkirjastatud ning pealegi puuduvad sealt sätted, mida iga kommertslaenuandja tavaliselt nõuaks (nt finantssätted ja sätted kohustuste täitmata jätmise puhuks).
Total profit (excl. revenue grants)
Viimasena väidab kaebuse esitaja, et Portsmouthi antud rahastus võimaldab MMD-l investeerida uude tegevustaristusse ja varadesse, mistõttu annab see ettevõttele konkurentsieelise.
Total profit as reported in annual reports (i.e. incl. revenue grants)
Seetõttu väidab kaebuse esitaja, et pikaajaline laenulimiit ei ole kooskõlas turumajanduse osalise põhimõttega ning on ebaseaduslik riigiabi, sest täidetud on ka kõik teised tingimused.
The grants were provided in the form of cash transfers in order to cover the annual trading loss of MMD.
meede – Portsmouth omandas 2010. ja 2011. aastal kaks kraanat ning liisis need pikaks ajaks MMD-le
The Complainant argues that MMD would not have been viable without that constant financial support by PCC.
Portsmouth otsustas MMD tegevuse toetamiseks osta 2010. ja 2011. aastal kaks mobiilset sadamakraanat (kumbki umbes 2,1 miljonit naela) ning liisida need seitsmeaastase kasutusrendilepingu alusel MMD-le.
In addition, it claims that PCC did not conduct any proper analysis of whether the provision of additional grants to MMD was economically justifiable.
Kummagi kraana 16000 naela suurune kuurent (190000 naela suurusele aastarendile lisaks) on arvutatud nii, et Portsmouthi investeering saaks tagasi makstud kraanade 15aastase kasutusea jooksul ja oleksid kaetud ka Portsmouthi kapitalikulud (kogu reaalintressimäär oleks niisiis 4,46 % ja 4,62 %).
Measure 3: Long-term loan facility provided by PCC to MMD from 2010
Kuigi kaebuses ei ole selle konkreetse meetme kohta ühtegi väidet, on kraanade omandamine ja liisimine üks mitmest meetmest, millega Portsmouth kaebuse esitaja väitel MMDd toetas, et too saaks investeerida uutesse seadmetesse, eirates nii tema väitel turutingimusi.
In 2010, PCC decided to provide a long-term (up to 20-years) loan facility of GBP 6,944 million to MMD.
meede – Portsmouth andis MMD-le arvelduskrediidi tagatise
The interest rate for the loan facility amounts to 4,81 %, corresponding to PCC's costs of borrowing plus an administration fee of 0,25 %.
Kui MMD omandati, sai see osa Portsmouthi kliendisuhtest Lloyds TSB pangaga.
The purpose of the loan facility is to support MMD's capital expenditure.
Vastutasuks küsis Lloyds TSB lisatagatisena ühe miljoni naela suurust tagatisraha.
The general terms of the loan facility are set out in a Commercial Loan Agreement between PCC and MMD, while for each draw-down of the loan additional documents are necessary (information on the capital expenditure intended to be covered by the loan, financial appraisal of each draw-down by MMD and PCC, appropriate collateral documents).
2011. aastal lisandus Lloyds TSB pangale antud tagatissummale ka Portsmouthi garantii MMD ühe miljoni naela suuruse igakuise arvelduskrediidi jaoks.
Between 2010 and 2017, a total of GBP 5,7 million has been drawn-down by MMD under this facility.
Lloyds TSB pank nõudis tagatissummat ja garantiid MMD tavapäraste äritehingute jaoks ja tagatisena maksetele, mida pank teeb MMD eest (nt CHAPS-maksed, BACS-maksed, tollitasud ja ettevõttele kuuluvad määratud tagasimaksega deebetkaardid).
The Complainant argues that the loan facility by PCC provided MMD with long-term funding on terms which would not have been available to it from ordinary commercial lenders.
Lloyds TSB pank saab tagatissummat või garantiid kasutada, kui MMD panga tehtud makseid ei hüvita.
It also claims that the loan agreement between PCC and MMD is not only unsigned but in particular lacks provisions which any commercial lender would routinely require (such as financial covenants or events of default).
Kaebuses on arvelduskrediidi tagatis nimetatud ühe meetmena, mille kaudu Portsmouth andis MMD-le pidevat rahalist abi, väidetavalt luues nii viimasele lubamatu majandusliku eelise.
Finally, it argues that the financing from PCC enables MMD to invest in new operating infrastructure and assets and thus provides it with a competitive advantage.
Menetluse algatamise põhjused
Therefore, the Complainant argues that the long-term loan facility does not correspond to market economy operator terms and, since all other criteria are also fulfilled, constitutes illegal State aid.
Algatamisotsuses avaldas komisjon kahtlust, kas MMD pidev abistamine iga-aastase tulutoetusega on kooskõlas turumajandusliku investori põhimõttega.
Measure 4: Acquisition of two cranes by PCC and their subsequent long-term lease to MMD in 2010 and 2011
Portsmouth maksis tulutoetust palju kauem ja rohkem, kui algul investeerimiskavas ette nähtud (16,71 miljonit naela kaheksa aasta jooksul, mitte 1,44 miljonit naela kahe aasta jooksul), mistõttu oli kahtlusi, kas need maksed pole mitte lühiajaline abi ettevõtte restruktureerimiseks.
In order to support the operations of MMD, PCC decided in 2010 and 2011 to purchase two mobile harbour cranes for approximately GBP 2,1 million each and to lease them to MMD under an operating lease agreement valid for 7 years.
Peale selle oli juba 2008/2009. majandusaastal selge, et algsed finantsprognoosid ei täitu.
The monthly rent of GBP 16000 (in excess of GBP 190000 per year) for each crane has been calculated so that the investment made by PCC is repaid over the expected lifetime of the cranes of 15 years while also covering PCC's own cost of capital (in total leading to effective interest rates of 4,46 % and 4,62 %).
Lisaks oli küll tõendeid selle kohta, et MMD omandamisele eelnes korralik majanduslik analüüs, aga mitte selle kohta, et majanduslikku mõistlikkust analüüsiti ka iga järgneva tulutoetuse makse eel.
Upon acquisition, MMD was brought under the umbrella of PCC's banking relationship with Lloyds TSB Bank.
meede – Portsmouth andis MMD-le 2010. aastal pikaajalise korduvkasutusega laenulimiidi
In return, Lloyds TSB required an additional security cash deposit of GBP 1 million.
Kuna MMD ei suutnud Portsmouthi tulutoetuseta mitme aasta vältel kasumlikuks saada, väljendas komisjon algatamisotsuses kahtlust, kas laenu tingimused olid kooskõlas MMD maksejõuetuse riskiga.
In May 2009, this security deposit was increased to GBP 1,2 million and in spring 2010 decreased to GBP 0,55 million.
Tundus kahtlane, kas erasektori võlausaldaja (isegi kui tegu on emaettevõttega) oleks andnud sellist laenu tütarettevõtte rahalisi raskusi piisavalt käsitlemata.
In 2011, this security deposit to Lloyds TSB Bank was supplemented by a guarantee by PCC to the bank for a monthly overdraft facility of GBP 1 million available to MMD.
Ühendkuningriigi esitatud kommertslaenuleping oli ka suhteliselt üldsõnaline ja sellest puudusid teatud standardsätted, mis on seal tavaliselt nõutavad (finants- ja makseviivituse sätted).
The deposit and subsequently also the guarantee were required by Lloyds TSB Bank to cover MMD's normal commercial transactions and to serve as security for payments that the bank makes on behalf of MMD (such as CHAPS payments, BACS payments, customs indemnity facility and Corporate Charge cards).
Kuna see meede on mõjult väga sarnane eespool analüüsitud pikaajalise laenulimiidiga (MMD kapitalimahutuste rahastamine Portsmouthi laenuvõtmiskulude alusel), olid sellega seotud kahtlused algatamisotsuses samad mis pikaajalise laenulimiidigi korral.
Lloyds TSB Bank is able to call upon the deposit or guarantee in the event that these payments made by the bank are subsequently not honoured by MMD.
Algatamisotsuse kohaselt ei paistnud Ühendkuningriigi esitatud MMD omandamise analüüsimise dokumentides olevat arvestatud Portsmouthilt nõutava tagatissumma suurenemisega.
The complaint includes the security for overdraft facility among the measures representing continued financial support by PCC to MMD, which gives MMD an allegedly undue economic advantage.
Isegi kui oleks saanud nõustuda väitega, et tagatissummaga oli kaudselt arvestatud, puudusid tõendid selle kohta, et Portsmouth analüüsis oma pikaajalist riskipositsiooni.
Grounds for initiating the procedure
MMD jätkuvale kahjumissejäämisele vaatamata Portsmouth lihtsalt jätkas ettevõttele käibekapitalilaenu limiitide tagatise andmist.
In the Opening Decision the Commission expressed concerns that the continued support to MMD by means of the annual revenue grants might not be MEIP-compliant.
Sellepärast avaldas komisjon algatamisotsuses kahtlust, kas MMD neid laenulimiite Portsmouthi toeta saaks, ning ühtlasi tundus ebatõenäoline, et samas olukorras eraemaettevõte oleks sellise rahalise abiga jätkanud, jättes seejuures tütarettevõtte rahalised raskused piisavalt käsitlemata.
The support by PCC in the form of revenue grants went far beyond the time and amount planned in the original investment case (GBP 16,71 million over 8 years as opposed to the originally planned GBP 1,44 million over two years) and therefore there were concerns that these cash grants could be considered as short-term and temporary support for the restructuring of the business.
HUVITATUD ISIKUTE MÄRKUSED
In addition, it was already evident in the first year 2008/2009 that the original financial forecasts would not materialise.
Kaebuse esitaja märkused
Further, while there was evidence of a proper economic analysis for the acquisition of MMD, there was little if any evidence on the file that demonstrated that each grant of additional revenue grant had been properly analysed as regards its economic sense.
Oma märkustes toetas kaebuse esitaja algatamisotsust, välja arvatud 1. meetme kohta tehtud järeldust, aga ei esitanud selle kohta mingeid lisaargumente ega -tõendeid.
The argument that the grants are almost balanced with the revenue streams from MMD to PCC that would be lost if it ceased operations was considered to be flawed since there was no evidence suggesting that the port assets (quays, warehouses etc.) used by MMD would remain idle if MMD were liquidated or would lead to a complete loss of the lease rentals and tonnage dues paid to PCC.
2.–5. meetmega seoses viitas kaebuse esitaja varem esitatule ja kordas arvamust, et pole mingit põhjust, miks Portsmouth oleks võinud arvata, et tema rahaline abi oleks kunagi piisavat majanduslikku kasu tooma hakanud, aga ei esitanud selle kohta lisatõendeid ega -väiteid.
Finally, there was no evidence that PCC had weighted up its continued support with alternative scenarios (such as putting MMD into liquidation) in order to demonstrate that it was in fact the most advantageous option, economically, throughout the whole period.
Ta vaid kutsus komisjoni üles jõudma järeldusele, et 2.–5. meede olid siseturuga kokkusobimatu riigiabi, mis tuleb tagasi maksta.