natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the representativity of tiers in terms of size of the production volume of the product concerned in the year 2016;
segmentide esindavus, võttes arvesse asjaomase toote tootmismahtu 2016. aastal;
the geographical spread; and
geograafiline jaotus ning
the representativity of the Union producers in terms of size, namely between SMEs and larger companies.
liidu tootjate esindavus seoses suurusega, nimelt VKEde ja suuremate ettevõtjate poolest.
The sampled Union producers comprise both large companies and SMEs.
Valimisse kaasatud liidu tootjate hulgas on nii suurettevõtjaid kui ka VKEsid.
The selected Union producers were based in six Member States which together accounted for more than 36 % of Union production and sales reported by the cooperating Union producers.
Valitud liidu tootjad asuvad kuues liikmesriigis ning nende toodang ja müük moodustavad kokku rohkem kui 36 % liidu tootmis- ja müügimahust, millest koostööd tegevad liidu tootjad on teatanud.
On 22 December 2017, one of the sampled Union producers, the Polish producer, Geyer & Hosaja, informed the Commission that it had decided to stop cooperating with the investigation.
22. detsembril 2017 teavitas üks valimisse kaasatud liidu tootja, Poola tootja Geyer & Hosaja, komisjoni sellest, et ta otsustas lõpetada uurimisel koostöö tegemise.
The percentages mentioned in recital (30) above are not impacted by the withdrawal of this producer as its production represents less than 0,1 % of the total Union production.
Selle tootja taandumine ei mõjuta põhjenduses 30 nimetatud protsente, sest tema toodang moodustab vähem kui 0,1 % liidu kogutoodangust.
The Commission therefore concluded that the final sample remains representative of the Union industry.
Komisjon järeldas seepärast, et lõplik valim on liidu tootmisharu suhtes tüüpiline.
Finally, the Giti Group submitted that the Commission should have terminated this investigation immediately because of the procedurally erroneous pre-selection of the sample of Union producers.
Lisaks väitis Giti kontsern, et komisjon oleks pidanud lõpetama selle uurimise viivitamata tingituna menetlusvigadest liidu tootjate valimi eelvaliku tegemisel.
The Commission recalled that the provisional selection of a sample of Union producers is legally possible and conducive to an effective investigation within tight deadlines.
Komisjon tuletas meelde, et liidu tootjate valimi esialgne valik on õiguspäraselt võimalik ning toob kaasa tõhusa uurimise lühikeste tähtaegade jooksul.
As demonstrated in recitals (26) to (30), the provisional sample was changed further to comments from interested parties.
Nagu on näidatud põhjendustes 26–30, muudeti esialgset valimit pärast huvitatud isikute märkuseid.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Selleks et otsustada, kas väljavõtteline uuring on vajalik, ja moodustada vajaduse korral valim, palus komisjon, et sõltumatud importijad esitaksid algatamisteates nimetatud teabe.
Five importers came forward importing around 430000 units of imports from the PRC.
Teavet esitas viis importijat, kes impordivad HRVst ligikaudu 430000 impordiühikut.
Two companies were sampled accounting for [70 % - 90 %] of the importers that submitted a sampling form.
Valimisse lisati kaks äriühingut, kes esindasid [70–90 %] importijatest, kes esitasid valimivormi.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Et otsustada, kas väljavõtteline uuring on vajalik, ning vajaduse korral moodustada valim, palus komisjon kõigil HRV teadaolevatel eksportivatel tootjatel esitada algatamisteates nimetatud teave.
In addition, it requested the authorities of the PRC to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Lisaks palus ta HRV ametiasutustel teha kindlaks muud eksportivad tootjad, kes võiksid olla uurimises osalemisest huvitatud, ja/või võtta nendega ühendust.
44 exporting producers/group(s) of exporting producers in the country concerned provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Nõutud teabe esitasid vaatlusaluse riigi 44 eksportivat tootjat/eksportivate tootjate kontserni, kes nõustusid kuuluma valimisse.
In accordance with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the following sample of four groups of exporting producers on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available:
Vastavalt alusmääruse artikli 27 lõike 1 punktile b moodustas komisjon valimi neljast eksportivate tootjate kontsernist, võttes aluseks suurima tüüpilise liitu suunatud ekspordi mahu, mida oli ettenähtud aja jooksul mõistlikult võimalik uurida:
China National Tire Group, China;
China National Tire kontsern, Hiina;
Giti Group, China;
Giti kontsern, Hiina;
Hankook Group, China;
Hankooki kontsern, Hiina;
Xingyuan Group, China.
Xingyuani kontsern, Hiina.
The sampled groups of exporting producers represented more than 50 % of the total imports of the product concerned to the Union.
Valimisse kaasatud eksportivate tootjate kontsernid esindasid rohkem kui 50 % liitu imporditud vaatlusalusest tootest.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the GOC, were consulted on the selection of the sample.
Kooskõlas alusmääruse artikli 27 lõikega 2 konsulteeriti valimi moodustamisel kõigi teadaolevate asjaomaste eksportivate tootjate ja Hiina valitsusega.
Comments on the proposed sample were received from the European Retreading Association (‘BIPAVER’), which claimed that the finally selected sample could lead to a strong imbalance in the product mix between tier 2 and tier 3 tyres.
Euroopa Protekteerimisühing (European Retreading Association ehk BIPAVER) esitas kavandatava valimi kohta märkuseid, väites, et lõplik valim võib kaasa tuua tootevaliku suure tasakaalutuse 2. ja 3. segmendi rehvide vahel.
In their view, the average import prices might not accurately reflect the part of import volumes that are most harmful to the Union industry.
Tema arvates ei pruugi keskmised impordihinnad kajastada asjakohaselt seda osa impordimahust, mis on liidu tootmisharule kõige kahjulikum.
Therefore, they urged the Commission to reassess and amend the sample.
Seepärast innustas ta komisjoni valimit ümber hindama ja muutma.
The Commission assessed whether it would be practically feasible to further enlarge the sample.
Komisjon hindas, kas oleks praktiliselt võimalik valimit veelgi laiendada.
It pointed out that the groups of exporting producers selected in the sample consisted of: (1) 13 legal entities that were involved in the production and domestic sales of the product concerned; (2) two related exporters located outside of the Union; and (3) more than ten related importers located in the Union.
Ta märkis, et valimisse kuuluvate eksportivate tootjate kontsernid koosnesid järgmistest isikutest: 1) 13 juriidilist isikut, kes osalesid asjaomase toote tootmise ja omamaise müügiga; 2) kaks seotud eksportijat, kes asusid väljaspool liitu; ning 3) rohkem kui kümme seotud importijat, kes asusid liidus.
The data provided by each of these entities needed to be processed and verified.
Neist iga üksuse esitatud andmeid tuli töödelda ja kontrollida.
Therefore, the Commission considered that more exporting producers could not be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Seepärast leidis komisjon, et olemasoleva aja jooksul ei ole mõistlik rohkem eksportijaid uurida.
BIPAVER also considered that two of the sampled companies were not representative recipients of countervailable subsidies because they have their headquarters and some production facilities outside of the PRC.
BIPAVER ütles ka seda, et kaks valimisse kuuluvat äriühingut ei olnud tasakaalustavate subsiidiumide tüüpilised saajad, sest nende peakontor ja mõned tootmisrajatised asuvad väljaspool HRVd.
The Commission noted that the fact that an individual company might not have received directly a specific type of alleged subsidy did not render the sample non-representative, as the purpose of the sample was to represent the overall tyres industry in the PRC with regard to eligibility for all types of alleged subsidies.
Komisjon märkis, et asjaolu, et mingi äriühing pruugi olla saanud teatavat tüüpi väidetavat subsiidiumit, ei muuda valimit mittetüüpiliseks, kuna valimi eesmärk on esindada kogu HRV rehvitööstust selles osas, mis puudutab kõiki arvessevõetavaid väidetavate subsiidiumide tüüpe.
The four sampled groups of exporting producers were representative in terms of eligibility for the subsidies alleged in the complaint.
Neli valimisse kuuluvat eksportivate tootjate kontserni olid kaebuses väidetud arvessevõetavate subsiidiumide osas tüüpilised.
Hence, the Commission considered that the selected sample represents a proper basis to examine the existence and the extent of the alleged subsidisation.
Seega leidis komisjon, et moodustatud valim on korrektne alus väidetava subsideerimise olemasolu ja ulatuse uurimiseks.
In addition to the four sampled exporting producers, six exporting producers declared that, in the event that they are not selected to be in the sample, they would like to receive a questionnaire and other claim forms in order to claim an individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Samas ükski neist ei vastanud küsimustikule.
As requested, the Commission sent questionnaires to these six exporting producers.
Küsimustiku vastused ja kontrollkäigud
However, none of them replied to the questionnaire.
Komisjon saatis küsimustikud neljale valimisse kaasatud Hiina eksportivale tootjale, valimisse mittekuuluvatele eksportivatele tootjatele ja valimisse kaasatud liidu tootjatele.
Questionnaire replies and verification visits
Küsimustikule vastas neli valimisse kuuluvat Hiina eksportivat tootjat ja kümme valimisse kuuluvat liidu tootjat.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the four sampled Chinese exporting producers; the non-sampled exporting producers as well as the sampled Union producers.
Mitte ükski valimisse mittekuuluv eksportiv tootja ei saatnud küsimustikule vastust.
Questionnaire replies were received from the four sampled Chinese exporting producers and from ten sampled Union producers.
Küsimustik saadeti ka Hiina valitsusele.
None of the non-sampled exporting producers sent a reply to the questionnaires.
See hõlmas eriküsimustikke Hiina arengupanga (CDB), Hiina ekspordi-impordipanga (EXIM), Hiina põllumajanduspanga (ABC), Bank of China (BOC) ning Hiina ekspordi- ja krediidikindlustuse korporatsiooni (Sinosure) jaoks.
A questionnaire was also sent to the GOC.
Kaebuses oli nendele finantsasutustele konkreetselt viidatud kui avaliku sektori asutustele või asutustele, kes on määratud ja volitatud subsiidiume maksma.
It included specific questionnaires for the China Development Bank (‘CDB’), Export Import Bank of China (‘EXIM’), Agricultural Bank of China (‘ABC’), Bank of China (‘BOC’), and the Chinese Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (‘Sinosure’).
Lisaks paluti Hiina valitsusel edastada finantsasutuste eriküsimustik kõikidele teistele finantsasutustele, mis andsid valimisse kuuluvatele äriühingutele või valimisse kuuluvate äriühingute ostjatele laene või ekspordikrediiti.
Those financial institutions had been specifically referred to in the complaint as public bodies or bodies directed and entrusted granting subsidies.
Hiina valitsusel paluti koguda kokku ka võimalikud vastused, mille need finantsasutused esitavad, ning saata need otse komisjonile.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward the specific questionnaire for financial institutions to any other financial institution that provided loans or export credits to the sampled companies, or to the buyers of the sampled companies.
Peale selle hõlmas Hiina valitsusele mõeldud küsimustik eriküsimustikke loodusliku kautšuki, sünteetilise kautšuki, tahma ja nailonkoorti tootjatele, kes kaebuse kohaselt pakuvad valimisse kaasatud äriühingutele sisendit piisavast tasust väiksema tasu eest, st äriühingutele Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd ja Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these financial institutions and to send them directly to the Commission.
Lisaks paluti Hiina valitsusel edastada see eriküsimustik kõikidele teistele kõnealuste toorainete tootjatele ja turustajatele, kes olid valimisse kaasatud äriühinguid sisendiga varustanud.
Furthermore, the questionnaire for the GOC included specific questionnaires for those producers of natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black and nylon cord which, according to the complaint, provided inputs at less than adequate remuneration to the sampled companies, i.e. Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd and Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
Hiina valitsusel paluti koguda kokku ka võimalikud vastused, mille need tootjad esitavad, ning saata need otse komisjonile.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward that specific questionnaire to all other producers and distributors of the raw materials in question which had provided inputs to the sampled companies.
Komisjon sai Hiina valitsuselt küsimustiku vastused, mis hõlmasid EXIMi, BOC, ABC ja Sinosure vastuseid eriküsimustikele.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these producers and to send them directly to the Commission.
Komisjon kogus ja kontrollis teavet, mida ta pidas vajalikuks subsideerimise, kahju ja liidu huvi kindlakstegemiseks.
The Commission received questionnaire replies from the GOC, which included replies to the specific questionnaire from EXIM, BOC, ABC and Sinosure.
Hiina kaubandusministeeriumi valdustesse tehti kontrollkäik, milles osalesid ka muude asjaomaste ministeeriumide ametnikud.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidy, injury and Union interest.
Lisaks osalesid kontrollkäigul järgmiste finantsasutuste esindajad:
A verification visit took place at the premises of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, during which officials from other relevant ministries also participated.
Hiina ekspordi-impordipank, Peking, Hiina;
Moreover, representatives from the following financial institutions were present during this verification visit;
Hiina põllumajanduspank, Peking, Hiina;
Export Import Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Bank of China, Peking, Hiina;
Agricultural Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Sinosure, Peking, Hiina.
Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Lisaks teostati järgmiste äriühingute valdustesse alusmääruse artikli 26 kohased kontrollkäigud.
Sinosure, Beijing, China.
Valimisse kaasatud liidu tootjad
Moreover, verification visits pursuant to Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poola;
Sampled Union producers
Wetest, Tšehhi Vabariik;
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poland;
Pneumatici, Itaalia;
Wetest, Czech Republic;
Bandeni tehas, Madalmaad;
Pneumatici, Italy;
Marangoni SpA Ltd, Itaalia;
Banden plant, the Netherlands;
Roline N.V., Madalmaad;
Marangoni SpA Ltd Italy;
neli liidu tootjat, kes taotlesid konfidentsiaalsust.
Roline N.V., the Netherlands;
Liidus asuvad ja valimisse kaasatud sõltumatud importijad
four Union producers which requested confidentiality.
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, Madalmaad;
Sampled unrelated importers in the Union
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Saksamaa.
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, the Netherlands;
Valimisse kaasatud HRV tootjad
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Germany.
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, HRV;
Sampled producers in the PRC
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Peking, HRV;
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Chemchina Corporation, Peking, HRV;
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Beijing, PRC;
Chemchina Finance, Peking, HRV;
Chemchina Corporation, Beijing, PRC;
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd., Peking, HRV;
Chemchina Finance, Beijing, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd., Taiyuan, HRV;
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd., Peking, HRV;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd, Taiyuan, PRC;
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, HRV;
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd., Jining, HRV;
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd., Jining, HRV;
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd:, Jining, PRC;
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd., Qingdao, HRV;
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC;
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd., Qingdao, HRV;
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., Jining, HRV.
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Shanghai, HRV;
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC.
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd., Hefei, HRV;
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Shanghai, PRC;
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd., Hefei, HRV;
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd., Hefei, HRV;
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd., Hualin, HRV;
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd., Fujian, HRV;
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd, Hualin, PRC;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, HRV;
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd, Fujian, PRC;
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, HRV;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd., Chongqing, HRV;
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd., Hubei, HRV;
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd., Shanghai, HRV;
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd, Hubei, PRC;
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd., Shanghai, HRV.
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd., Shanghai, HRV;
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC.
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Chongqing, HRV;
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Jiangsu, HRV;
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, HRV;
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Jiangsu, PRC;
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, HRV;
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, HRV;
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd., Dongying, HRV.
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Ajutiste meetmete kehtestamata jätmine ja edasine menetluskäik
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd, Dongying, PRC.
Arvestades, et komisjon oli kehtestanud 2018. aasta mais paralleelses dumpinguvastases asjas ajutised meetmed, otsustas ta käesoleva juhtumi puhul ajutisi meetmeid mitte kehtestada.
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
13. juulil 2018 said kõik huvitatud isikud teabedokumendi, milles kirjeldati komisjoni esialgseid järeldusi väidetava subsiidiumikava kohta ja komisjoni esialgseid järeldusi kahju, põhjusliku seose ja liidu huvi kohta, nagu on sätestatud ajutise dumpinguvastase tollimaksu määruses.
Given that it had imposed provisional measures in the parallel anti-dumping case in May 2018, the Commission decided not to impose provisional measures in the present case.
Mitu huvitatud isikut esitas kirjaliku seisukoha teabedokumendi kohta.
On 13 July 2018, all interested parties received an Information Document describing the Commission's preliminary findings on the alleged subsidy schemes and the Commission's preliminary conclusions as far as injury, causation and Union interest were concerned, as set out in the provisional anti-dumping Regulation.
Isikutele, kes taotlesid ärakuulamist, anti selleks võimalus.
Several interested parties made written submissions on the information document.
Pärast teabedokumendi avaldamist teatas Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., et teda ei tuleks käsitada China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd. (edaspidi „CNRC“) seotud äriühinguna.
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Selles mõttes ei nõustunud Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. liidu tolliseadustiku rakendusakti (EL) 2015/2447 (edaspidi „liidu tolliseadustik“) artikli 127 kohaldamisega seotud äriühingute subsideerimise kaalutud keskmise summa arvutamise eesmärgil.
Following the disclosure of the Information Document, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd claimed that it should not be considered as a related company of China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd (‘CNRC’).
Selle asemel viitas Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd.
In this sense, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd disagreed with the application of Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 (the ‘Union Customs Code’) for the purpose of calculating a weighted average amount of subsidisation for related companies.
WTO subsiidiumide ja tasakaalustusmeetmete lepingu artikli 16 määratlusele, milles nõutakse äriühingute vahelise seose kindlaks tegemiseks seda, et üks äriühing kontrollib teist.
Instead, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd referred to the definition of Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement, which requires control of one company over another, in order to establish the relation between companies.
Seejärel väitis Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., et Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. ei kvalifitseeru seotud äriühinguna selle normi alusel, sest väidetavasti ei kontrolli CNRC teda.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd then argued that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd would not qualify as a related company under this standard, as it was allegedly not controlled by CNRC.
Lisaks märkis Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., et alusmääruses ei viidata liidu tolliseadustikule.
In addition, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd noted that the basic Regulation did not make any reference to the Union Customs Code.
Komisjon tuletas meelde, et WTO subsiidiumide ja tasakaalustusmeetmete lepingu artikkel 16 on kajastatud alusmääruse artikli 9 lõikes 2.
The Commission recalled that Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement is mirrored in Article 9(2) of the basic Regulation.
Samas viitavad mõlemad artiklid üksnes liidu tootmisharu määratlusele ja liidu tootjate suhtele eksportivate tootjatega.
However, both articles refer only to the definition of the Union industry and the relationship of Union producers to exporting producers.
Selles kontekstis võidakse liidu tootja leida liidu tootmisharu määratluse alusel, kui eksportiv tootja omab tema üle kontrolli.
In that context, a Union producer may be taken from the definition of the Union industry if it is controlled by an exporting producer.
Samas ei sisalda ei WTO subsiidiumide ja tasakaalustusmeetmete leping ega ka alusmäärus sätteid meetodi kohta, kuidas hinnata subsideerimise summa kindlaks tegemisel suhet eksportivate tootjate vahel.
In contrast, both the ASCM Agreement and the basic Regulation are silent about the method how to assess the relationship between exporting producers for the purpose of establishing the amount of subsidisation.
Selleks et tagada, et meetmeid saab tõhusalt jõustada, eelkõige eesmärgiga ära hoida ekspordi suunamist madalaima tollimaksuga seotud äriühingu kaudu, on komisjonil tavaks teha kindlaks eksportivate tootjate vaheline seos, lähtudes liidu tolliseadustiku 24. novembri 2015. aasta rakendusakti (EL) 2015/2447 artiklis 127 sätestatud kriteeriumidest.
In order to ensure that measures can be enforced effectively, particularly to avoid channelling exports through a related company with the lowest duty, it is the Commission's practice to establish the relationship between exporting producers through the criteria laid down in Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015.
Sellest teatati selgelt kõikidele isikutele menetluse alguses saadetud algatamisteates.