natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nevertheless, due to the rather limited range of product types produced by this company compared to the wide range of product types exported by the sampled Chinese exporting producers to the Union, the Commission decided that the data provided by the Swiss company would be inappropriate for the determination of the normal value for the Chinese exporting producers.
Sobiva võrdlusriigi määramiseks toimis komisjon põhjenduses 104 selgitatu kohaselt.
With this regard it is noted that only 4,6 % of product types exported to the Union by Chinese producers covering 4,2 % of Chinese export volume were directly matching with product types produced by the Swiss producer.
Eeltoodud väited lükati seetõttu tagasi.
In case of Taiwan, finally used as the analogue country, the level of direct matching with product types exported to the Union by the Chinese producers was 7,7 % for the number of product types and 11,1 % for the export volume.
Lõpuks seadsid kaks Hiina eksportivat tootjat ja CCCMC küsimuse alla väidetava tõsise menetluse rikkumise, tuginedes asjaolule, et komisjon arvutas Hiina tootjate dumpingumarginaale alusmääruse mitteturumajanduslikke süsteeme käsitlevate sätete alusel.
In this situation, the Commission decided to use the other country subject to the investigation, i.e. Taiwan, as the analogue country despite arguments initially presented by the complainants claiming that Taiwanese companies mainly produced fittings types based on welded tubes as raw material (as opposed to the Chinese producers, which use mainly seamless tubes).
Selle väite kohta märgib komisjon, et küsimuses, kas kõnealuseid eeskirju alusmääruse kohaselt kohaldada või mitte, puudub komisjonil kaalutlusõigus.
The same argument was put forward also by the Chinese exporting producers.
Seepärast lükati see väide tagasi.
On the other hand, the CCCMC in its submission after provisional disclosure considered that the Taiwanese manufacturing cost data would be more appropriate for the basis of construction of the normal value than data of the Union producers, which was also considered by the Commission as an alternative in the provisional disclosure.
Vastavalt põhjenduses 103 selgitatule määrati Hiinas asuvate eksportivate tootjate puhul normaalväärtus kindlaks vastavalt alusmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktile a võrdlusriigis, antud juhul Taiwanis kehtiva arvestusliku väärtuse põhjal.
Taiwan was considered appropriate as an analogue country because, contrary to what was claimed by the complainants and notwithstanding the different use of raw materials, the data provided allowed for a proper attribution methodology of costs in relation to the different characteristic of the product coding.
Kuna Taiwanis puudus samasuguse toote omamaine müük, arvutati normaalväärtus kooskõlas alusmääruse artikli 2 lõigetega 3 ja 6, mille kohaselt lisati asjaomase tooteliigi keskmistele tootmiskuludele Taiwani turul uurimisperioodi jooksul kujunenud müügi-, üld- ja halduskulud ning saadud kasum.
Furthermore, the level of competition on Taiwanese market is high since there are at least 10 known domestic producers of the product concerned and this is also reflected in a strong presence of imports from different origins, in a situation where the level of custom duties is moderate (7,5 % to 10 %).
Tootmiskulude kehtestamise alusena kasutas komisjon ühe koostööd tegeva Taiwani tootja (Ta Chen) andmeid.
For the reasons above, the Commission decided to use Taiwan as the analogue country for the PRC.
Tuleb märkida, et teine koostööd tegev Taiwani tootja (King Lai) tootis vaatlusalust toodet uurimisperioodi jooksul väga piiratud koguses ning tootmine oli peamiselt seotud spetsialiseeritud tooteliikidega.
The parties in question also submitted that the matching level of comparable products was too low.
Nende liitmike tootmiskulud on väga suured, mistõttu võib nende arvesse võtmine arvutust moonutada.
The claim of low matching level of comparable products was also raised by one of the Union importer.
Peale selle ei ekspordi valimisse kaasatud Hiina tootjad neid tooteliike liitu (ehkki nad võivad olla tootekoodidega hõlmatud, sest karedus ei ole parameeter, millega tootekoodide moodustamisel arvestatakse).
The latter company indicated also that the China could not be compared to Taiwan as the two entities have different levels of Human Development Index (‘HDI’) and GDP per capita.
Seepärast ei pidanud komisjon selle äriühingu tootmiskulude andmeid Hiina tootjatele normaalväärtuse arvutamiseks sobivateks.
With regard to these claims, it is first recalled that the WTO ruling [7] implies that all product types exported by the Chinese exporting producers should be assigned a normal value.
Üks liidu importija väitis normaalväärtuse arvutamise küsimuses, et Taiwani äriühingu King Lai tootmiskulusid ei saa kasutada Hiina äriühingutele normaalväärtuse arvutamise alusena, sest King Lai toodab teistsugust toodet, mida ei saa pidada tööstusliitmikuks, mis omakorda viitab teistsugusele tootmismeetodile ja kasumi ulatusele.
The Commission considers that the data found at the level of one analogue country exporting producer is sufficient to base the remaining product types upon as the types found allow for further construction of the missing product types.
Vastuseks sellele väitele kordas komisjon, et andmeid King Lai tootmiskulude kohta ei kasutatud võrdluses teiste äriühingutega.
The occurrence of only one such exporting producer is by no means exceptional or a new practice.
Kasutatud kasumitaseme kohta märgiti, et see asub samas vahemikus (1–5 %) kui teiste äriühingute kasum.
The basic Regulation further foresees that the normal value can be constructed based on the cost of production, in the absence of domestic sales.
Sama liidu importija väitis ka, et teine Taiwani tootja, Ta Chen, kelle tootmiskulusid kasutati Hiina eksportivatele tootjatele normaalväärtuse arvutamise alusena, on suur ja integreeritud äriühing ning suudab seetõttu kulusid optimeerida.
Secondly, it is recalled that the HDI and GDP levels are not factors which are taken into account in the establishment as to whether an analogue country is appropriate.
Seepärast ei saa kõnealust äriühingut väikeste Hiina tehastega võrrelda.
In order to determine the proper analogue country, the Commission proceeds as explained in recital 104.
Selles küsimuses tuletas komisjon meelde, et Hiina tootjate tootmiskulusid selle menetluse ajal ei analüüsitud, kuna ükski Hiina tootja ei taotlenud turumajanduslikku kohtlemist.
The above claims were therefore rejected.
Tuleb siiski märkida, et Taiwani tootja väidetavad optimeeritud kulud saavad Hiina eksportivate tootjate jaoks kaasa tuua vaid madalamat arvestuslikku normaalväärtust ja järelikult ka madalamaid dumpingumarginaale.
Finally, two Chinese exporting producers and the CCCMC raised questions on allegedly a serious procedural flaw based on the fact that the Commission calculated the Chinese producers' dumping margins on the basis of the non-market economy (NME) provisions of the basic Regulation.
Arvestades asjaolu, et Taiwanis suudeti määratleda vaid väike hulk tooteliike, mida valimisse kaasatud Hiina eksportivad tootjad liitu ekspordivad, arvutas komisjon ülejäänud tooteliikide normaalväärtuse Taiwanis toodetud kõige sarnasemate tooteliikide tootmiskulude alusel, et saavutada täielik ja õiglane võrdlus, võttes aluseks tootmiskulud, mida on kohandatud:
The parties claimed that the legal authority to apply NME methodology for the determination of normal value for the Chinese exporting producers expires on 11 December 2016.
kasutatud tooraine erinevuste järgi – liidu tootmisharu kinnitatud kuluandmete alusel, mille kohaselt on õmblusteta torudest valmistatud liitmike tootmine 2,12–2,97 korda kallim kui keevistorudest liitmike valmistamine;
This claim was therefore rejected.
kuju erinevuste järgi – Hiina eksportijate müügitehingute tuvastatud hinnaerinevuste alusel, mille kohaselt peetakse torupõlve kõige tavapärasemaks kujuks ja muud kujud (torukolmikud, siirdmikud, otsakud ja erivormid) on 1,08–1,74 korda kallimad.
As explained in recital 103, the normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC was determined on the basis of constructed value in the analogue country, in this case Taiwan, in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Pärast esialgsete järelduste avalikustamist esitatud teates pakkus CCCMC välja alternatiivse aluse punktide a ja b kohandamiseks ning esitas selleks Hiina turgude andmed.
Furthermore, due to lack of domestic sales of the like product in Taiwan, normal value was constructed in line with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation by adding to the average cost of manufacturing of the relevant product type SG&A costs incurred and profit realised on the Taiwanese market during the investigation period.
Kuid ühelt poolt ei ole need andmed kinnitatud ja teiselt poolt pärinevad need mitteturumajanduslikust riigist.
As a basis for establishing of manufacturing costs, the Commission used data of one of the cooperating Taiwanese producers (Ta Chen).
Seepärast muudaks nende andmete kasutamine võrdlusriigi normaalväärtuse arvutamise metoodika sisutühjaks.
It should be noted that the second Taiwanese cooperating producer (King Lai) had very limited production volume of the product concerned in the investigation period and this production related to highly specialised product types.
Seepärast lükati see CCCMC taotlus tagasi.
In this small part of their production which is still considered product concerned King Lai is producing products which could be considered low-roughness fittings but with an extra surface treatment which makes their surface roughness to raise above 0,8 micrometer and thus according to the definition of recital 47 it is product concerned.
Lõplike järelduste avalikustamise järel väitsid CCCMC ja kaks Hiina eksportivat tootjat, et Taiwani kuluandmete kohandamine liidu tootmisharu kuluandmete alusel ei ole mõistlik.
These fittings have very high costs of manufacturing and taking them into account would distort calculations.
Kõnealused pooled viitasid liidu tavapraktikale, mille kohaselt ei ole seda varasemate juhtumite puhul tehtud.
Furthermore, these types of product are not exported by the Chinese sampled producers to the EU (although they might be covered by their PCNs as roughness is not one of the parameters of the PCN construction).
Nagu juba varem öeldud, muudeti liidu varasemat praktikat põhjenduses 107 nimetatud WTO otsuse valguses.
Therefore, manufacturing costs data of this company were considered by Commission as not appropriate for the construction of normal value for the Chinese producers.
Puuduvate tooteliikide normaalväärtuse arvutamiseks tugines komisjon Taiwani kuluandmetele, kohandas tuvastatud kulud ning kinnitas need, kohaldades proportsionaalset kohandamist, mis tuvastati liidu tootmisharu tootmiskulude tasemel.
With regard to the construction of the normal value, one Union importer claimed that manufacturing costs of the Taiwanese company King Lai could not be used as basis for calculation of the normal value for the Chinese companies as King Lai produces a different product which cannot be considered as industrial fitting and that it also implies a different production method and range of profits.
CCCMC ei suutnud põhjendada, miks see ei olnud mõistlik, ega pakkuda välja alternatiivset meetodit.
In response to this claim, it is reiterated that the Commission did not use any manufacturing costs data of King Lai for comparison with other companies.
Pärast täiendavate järelduste avalikustamist kordasid CCCMC ja kaks Hiina eksportivat tootjat oma vastuväidet liidu tootmisharu andmete kasutamisele puuduvate tooteliikide normaalväärtuse arvutamisel kasutatavate tootmiskulude kohandamiseks.
For constructing the normal value of other companies, the Commission used only King Lai's SG&A costs and profit of the same general category of product sold on the domestic market, in accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Pooled rõhutasid, et komisjon ei esitanud tõendeid, mis näitaksid, et liidu turu toorainekulude erinevus on Taiwani turuga samal tasemel.
It is also recalled that the SG&A cost used for these calculations was adjusted in order to take into account differences between the products produced by King Lai and other companies.
Lisaks kordasid pooled oma väidet, et komisjon võiks eespool nimetatud kohandamiseks kasutada Hiina õmblusteta ja keevisliitmike ekspordimüügi hindade erinevusi, kuna müügihinnad „peegeldavad teatud ulatuses suundumusi tootmiskulude erinevuses“.
With regard to the profit used, it is stressed that is not in a different range (1 %-5 %) than those of other companies.
Vastuseks eeltoodud väidetele rõhutas komisjon kõigepealt, et toorainena kasutatud torude tüüpide või terase klasside suhtes toimuvat kohandamise taset ei ole võimalik Taiwani turu andmetega võrrelda, sest Taiwani tootja, kelle tootmiskulusid normaalväärtuse arvutamise alusena kasutati, lihtsalt ei kasutanud teatud tüüpi toorainet.
The same Union importer also claimed that the second Taiwanese producer, Ta Chen, whose manufacturing costs were used as the basis of calculation for the normal value of Chinese exporting producers, is a large and integrated company and, as such, is able to ‘optimise costs’.
See oli ka peamine põhjus, mis komisjon üleüldse kaalus puuduvate kuluandmete otsimist võrdlusriigi turust väljaspool.
Thus, the company in question cannot be compared with the small Chinese factories.
Teiseks korrati Hiina hindade kasutamisega seoses, et ükski Hiina eksportiv tootja ei taotlenud selles menetluses turumajanduslikku kohtlemist.
In this regard, the Commission recalled that the manufacturing costs of the Chinese producers were not part of the analysis in this procedure as none of the Chinese producers had claimed MET status.
Seetõttu ei olnud andmed Hiina tootmiskulude kohta kättesaadavad ega kontrollitavad.
Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the allegedly ‘optimised costs’ of the Taiwanese producer can only result in a lower constructed normal value and therefore in lower dumping margins for the Chinese exporting producers.
Seepärast ei saa komisjon teha järeldusi selle kohta, millises ulatuses peegeldavad müügihindade erinevused eri tooteliikide tootmiskulude erinevusi [8].
Taking into account that only a limited number of product types exported to the Union by the sampled Chinese exporting producers could be identified in Taiwan, the Commission has constructed the normal value of the remaining product types based on the costs of manufacturing of the most resembling product types produced in Taiwan in order to achieve a full and fair comparison, based on the costs of manufacturing adjusted for:
Isegi kui selliseid järeldusi oleks võimalik teha, kehtiks need mitteturumajandusliku riigi tootmiskulude kohta.
differences in raw material used — on the basis of verified Union Industry cost data, whereby fittings produced from seamless tubes are between 2,12 and 2,97 times more expensive to produce than those from welded tubes;
Seega lükati eespool esitatud väited tagasi.
differences in grade of steel — on the basis of verified Union industry data, whereby a steel grade cost adjustment is made to the cost of the least expensive steel grades used for fittings produced based on welded tubes as raw material; this adjustment ranges from 1,49 to 3,60 times depending on the steel grades used;
Lisaks seadsid need huvitatud isikud küsimuse alla kohanduse, mille kohaselt on õmblusteta torudest valmistatud liitmike tootmine 2,12–2,97 korda kallim kui keevistorudest liitmike valmistamine.
differences in shapes — on the basis of observed price differences in the sales transactions of the Chinese exporters, whereby an elbow is considered the most basic shape and the other shapes (tees, reducers, caps and specialty forms) are between 1,08 and 1,74 times more expensive.
Nad tuginevad CCCMC poolt pärast esialgsete järelduste avalikustamist esitatud põhjendamata väitele, mille kohaselt on keevis- ja õmblusteta torude hinnatasemete erinevus väidetavalt väiksem kui 30 % keevistoru hinnast.
The CCCMC proposed in its submission after provisional disclosure an alternative basis for adjustments of points (a) and (b) and presented data from the Chinese markets in this respect.
Selles küsimuses märgiti, et komisjoni tehtud kohandused põhinevad õmblusteta torudest ja keevistorudest valmistatud liitmike jälgitavade kulude vahelistel erinevustel, mitte keevis- ja õmblusteta torude endi hindade erinevusel.
However, this data are, firstly, unverified and, secondly, originate in a non-market economy country.
Samuti tuleb märkida, et ükski Hiina eksportiv tootja ei taotlenud turumajanduslikku kohtlemist.
Therefore, using them would negate the analogue country methodology for the calculation of the normal value.
Selle tulemusel ei esitanud Hiina eksportivad tootjad mingeid andmeid tootmiskulude kohta ega teinud seda ka siis, kui seadsid kahtluse alla komisjoni poolt määratletud kulud ja erinevused.
This claim of the CCCMC was thus rejected.
Veelgi enam, standardsed hinnakirjad on kulude ja hindade määramisega veel vähem seotud, sest need ei anna teavet efektiivselt kohaldatud hindade, veel vähem kulutasemete kohta.
Following the final disclosure, the CCCMC, as well as two Chinese exporting producers, claimed it was unreasonable to adjust the Taiwanese cost data by using the Union industry cost data.
Oma kinnituste põhjendamiseks esitasid huvitatud isikud erinevuste analüüsi, mis põhines tootjate Zhejiang Goodi ja Zhejiang Jndia hinnatasemetel, ning tegid selle põhjal järelduse, et kohaldatav hindade kohandamine peaks olema vastavalt vahemikus 0,43–1,70 ja 0,64–1,80.
The parties in question referred to the Union common practice not to do that in past cases.
Lisaks sellele, et need vahemikud viitavad hindadele, mitte kuludele, ei tõenda asjaolu, et keevistorudel põhinevad liitmikuid müüakse mõnikord kõrgema hinnaga kui õmblusteta torudel põhinevaid liitmikke, seda, et kulud peaksid olema suuremad.
As mentioned above, the EU's previous practice was revised in the light of the WTO ruling referred to in recital 107.
Esitatud hinnatasemed illustreerivad pigem majandusliku seose puudumist kulude ja klientidele kehtestatud hindade vahel või, teisest küljest, viitavad asjaolule, et oma rolli on mänginud muud tegurid, näiteks tellimuste mahud.
In order to construct the normal values of the missing product types, the Commission relied on Taiwanese cost data and adjusted the costs found and verified by applying proportional adjustments that were found at the level of the cost of production of the Union industry.
Komisjon ei saa konfidentsiaalsuse nõude tõttu avalikustada aluseks olevaid andmeid, kuid saab avaldada edasised faktilised andmed, mille kohaselt on kohandamine keevistorudel (W) põhinevatelt liitmikelt õmblusteta torudel (S) põhinevatele liitmikele kooskõlas tootekoodi kirjeldusega järgmine:
The CCCMC failed to substantiate why this was unreasonable and/or to propose an alternative approach.
W1-lt S1-le
Following additional disclosure CCCMC and the two Chinese exporting producers reiterated their objection to the use of Union industry data for the adjustment of costs of manufacturing used in construction of the normal value for missing product types.
W2-lt S2-le
The parties underlined that the Commission did not provide evidence showing that differences in raw material costs in the EU market would be at the same level of that in Taiwan's market.
W3-lt S3-le
Furthermore, the parties repeated their claim that the Commission could use differences in Chinese export sales prices of seamless and welded fitting for the above adjustment as sales prices ‘to some extent reflect the trend of differences in costs of production’.
W4-lt S4-le
In response to the above claims it is first stressed that the Commission could not compare the level of adjustments for types of pipes used as raw materials or grades of steel to the data from Taiwanese market as the Taiwanese producer whose costs of manufacturing were used as a basis for construction of normal value simply did not use certain types of raw materials.
Muud ümberhindamised ei olnud vajalikud, et teha arvutusi Hiina eksportivate tootjate poolt eksporditavate tooteliikide kohta.
That was the basic reason why the Commission at all considered looking for the missing cost data outside the market of the analogue country.
Seejärel tegi komisjon edasisi kohandusi, hinnates kõige odavama teraseklassi W1 kulu ümber teistele klassidele ja/või õmblusteta torude teistele klassidele, kasutades taas andmeid liidu tootmisharu tootmiskulude kohta.
Secondly, with regard to the use of Chinese prices, it is reiterated that none of the Chinese exporting producers had claimed MET in this procedure.
Komisjon ei saa taaskord konfidentsiaalsuse nõude tõttu avalikustada aluseks olevaid andmeid, kuid saab avaldada edasised faktilised andmed:
Therefore, the Chinese costs of production were not available nor examined.
W1-lt S2-le
Thus, the Commission cannot draw any conclusion ‘to what extent’ differences in sales prices reflect differences in costs of production of different types of fittings [8].
W1-lt S3-le
Furthermore, even if such conclusions could be drawn it would apply to the costs of production in a NME country.
W1-lt S4-le
Therefore, the above claims are rejected.
W1-lt W3-le
These interested parties further question the adjustment whereby fittings produced from seamless tubes are between 2,12 and 2,97 times more expensive to produce than those from welded tubes.
W1-lt W4-le
They refer to an unsubstantiated CCCMC claim made after provisional disclosure regarding price levels, whereby the difference between welded and seamless tubes is said to be less than 30 % of the price of welded tubes.
Komisjon soovib ka rõhutada, et oma kommentaarides nende kohandustegurite kohta ei viita huvitatud isikud mõlema Hiina eksportiva tootja hinnatasemetele, nagu nad seda tegid muude kohandamiste puhul, ilmselt põhjusel, et need andmed ei sea komisjoni metoodikat kahtluse alla.
In this regard, it is noted that the adjustment made by the Commission is based on the observed cost difference between fittings produced using seamless tubes and fittings produced using welded tubes, and not on the price difference between welded and seamless tubes as such.
Kujude erinevuse puhul tehti kohandusi nelja valimisse kaasatud eksportiva tootja müügihindade andmete alusel, mis on palju ülevaatlikumad kui kahe tootja andmed, keda Hiina huvitatud isikud esindavad.
It should also be noted that none of the Chinese exporting producers requested MET.
Võttes aluseks torupõlvede hinnataseme, on proportsioonid järgmised:
As a consequence, the Chinese exporting producers had not submitted any cost of production data and continued to do so even when putting into doubt the cost determinations and differences established by the Commission.
torukolmikud
Moreover, standard price lists are even further away from cost and price determinations as they do not give evidence of the prices effectively applied, let alone of the costs levels.
siirdmikud
To support their submissions, the interested parties provided an analysis of differences based on price levels of the producers Zhejiang Good and Zhejiang Jndia, concluding on this basis that the applicable price adjustment should be between 0,43 and 1,70, and 0,64 and 1,80 respectively.
otsakud
Apart from the fact that these ranges refer to prices and not costs, the fact that welded tube based fittings are sometimes sold at higher prices than seamless tube based fittings does not give evidence that the costs should be higher.
muud kujud
The quoted price levels rather illustrate a complete absence of an economic link between the costs and the price quoted to clients, or alternatively it means that other factors have played a role, such as order size.
Normaalväärtuse arvutamise järgmisel etapil kohandas komisjon põhjenduste 112–117 kohaselt arvutatud tootmiskulud, liites neile müügi-, üld- ja halduskulud ning kasumi.