natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
by Decision 36/6/EC, RAS decided that Saremar was to verify, on the basis of a business plan, the viability of operation for the period 30 September 2011 to 30 September 2012, of at least one additional route among Olbia – Livorno, Porto Torres — Livorno and Cagliari – Piombino.
Ekspert jõudis järeldusele, et Saremari 2011. ja 2012. aastal tehtud reklaami turuväärtus jääb vahemikku 2458168 kuni 2609631 eurot (ilma käibemaksuta).
Saremar was also required to resume, on the basis of a business plan, the Golfo Aranci (or Olbia) - Civitavecchia, Porto Torres — Vado Ligure (or Genova) lines from 15 May 2012 to 15 September 2012.
Seega leiab Sardiinia maakond, et tema Saremarile makstud hind oli põhjendatud.
The decision not to start serving new routes, but rather to resume operation in the 2012 summer season of the two routes already operated by Saremar in 2011, was equally based on profitability grounds;
Turumaksumust on võrreldud keskmiste reklaamikuludega ruutmeetri kohta, mis on leitud selliste parameetrite alusel nagu kestus (arvesse võeti teatavaid soodustusi reklaamikampaania jätkamisel 2012. aastal), reklaami liik (sise- või välireklaam) ja asukoht (suuremad linnad, elanikkonna oluline sissevool, suurema liiklusega alad).
RAS's decision to contain operational losses by the interruption of the service on both routes at the end of the 2012 high season and to partly compensate operational losses was instrumental in ensuring that its business risk was reduced to a minimum.
Sardiinia maakond väidab, et kui Saremarile reklaamitegevuse eest makstud hinda loetaks liiga kõrgeks, piirduks äriühingule antud eelis tegelikult makstud hinna ja teenuste turuväärtuse vahega.
Second, RAS stressed that the four Altmark criteria have been observed in this case, for the grounds developed below.
Kuid Saremar ei ole krediidiliini kasutanud ning juulis 2011 kooskõlas otsusega 23/2 väljastatud kinnituskiri aegus 30. novembril 2011.
National authorities have a wide power of discretion as concerns the definition of SGEIs.
Kuna kinnituskiri ei olnud seotud äriühingu finantskohustustega, ei saa seda pidada tagatiseks.
RAS has been granted competencies as concerns territorial continuity by Law 296 of 7 December 2006 and is therefore the best placed authority to define SGEIs as concerns links from Sardinia to mainland Italy.
Teist, otsusega 52/119 heaks kiidetud kinnituskirja ei väljastatud ja seepärast ei ole Sardiinia maakonnal Saremari kasuks siduvaid kohustusi.
On this basis, RAS underlines its interest in ensuring territorial continuity at affordable fares.
Õigupoolest ei ole otsusega 52/119 ette nähtud finantstehingut (arvelduskrediit summas 5 miljonit eurot) kunagi lõpule viidud.
The entrustment of the service to Saremar on a trial basis would have addressed general interest needs and would have been guided by urgency reasons.
Nagu tuletati meelde otsuses 12/15, taotles ja sai Saremar lepingu alusel MPS pangalt laenu ilma Sardiinia maakonna tagatiseta.
As to the actual necessity of the imposition of PSOs, RAS first recalls the severe crisis of former parent company Tirrenia, which had traditionally operated links between Sardinia and mainland Italy.
Otsuses 36/6 sätestatud 11,5 miljonit eurot vastab Tirrenia vastu maksejõuetusmenetluses esitatud nõudele.
Tirrenia's financial distress had allegedly resulted in extreme uncertainty as concerns the operation of the public service, at least until July 2012 when CIN signed the new Convention.
Kõnealune summa aga viitab Tirrenia kontserni finantstehingutele, mis tehti enne 2009. aastat.
RAS recalls that the sale of Tirrenia to CIN, in its original composition of shareholders, had been blocked by the Commission.
Seepärast oleks see summa olnud lubatud juba 2004. aastal, kui komisjon võttis vastu oma lõppotsuse algsete lepingute kohta kuni 2008. aasta lõpuni.
Second, RAS submits that the increase in transport prices on the routes connecting Sardinia to the mainland in the following months seriously affected most users, and in particular the socially vulnerable part of the Sardinian community.
Praeguseks on rekapitaliseerimine toimunud vaid osaliselt.
It was on these grounds that, in April 2011, RAS decided to set up, on a trial basis, public transport services aiming to ensure territorial continuity with the mainland at affordable rates.
15. juuni 2012. aasta otsusega sätestati Saremari aktsionäride koosolekul suurendada äriühingu aktsiakapitali 1209010,64 eurolt 6099961 euroni, emiteerides 307765 lihtaktsiat nimiväärtusega 19,82 eurot.
The private operators, although consulted on the issue, had according to RAS not shown any willingness to contain prices and rejected any form of erga omnes obligation on fares.
11. juulil 2012 suurendas Sardiinia maakond Saremari kapitali vaid 824309,6 euro võrra.
The operation of the SGEI was entrusted to Saremar by means of several entrustment acts, which would clearly outline the public interest objective.
Sardiinia maakond lubas ülejäänud 4066640,67 eurot märkida tingimusel, et peetakse kinni kavatsetud meetmete rakendamiskeelust ja komisjoni teavitatakse tegevusest.
Saremar qualifies as in-house operator of RAS: it is directly controlled by RAS, which is its sole shareholder; it was statutorily entrusted with the operation of the links from Sardinia to the minor islands and Corsica on one hand, and to the mainland on the other; it does not dispose of any discretion as concerns the operation of the services entrusted to it, which are unilaterally determined by RAS; also, Saremar does not develop any activity contrary to the interest of RAS.
Meede ei hõlma uute riigi vahendite üleandmist ega ole seetõttu riigiabi.
Consequently, RAS argues that, in accordance with public procurement rules, it did not need to tender out the provision of the service, but was free to directly award it to the internal operator.
Meedet tuleks pidada kokkusobivaks turumajandusliku investeerimise põhimõttega, arvestades, et see tugineb eelnevalt määratletud äriplaanile ja et selle eesmärk on optimeerida äriühingu müügitulu usaldusväärse elujõulisuse tagamiseks.
As long as the compensation did not exceed the costs incurred in the operation of the service, State aid was not involved.
Lõpuks rõhutab Sardiinia maakond, et eraettevõtjad – eelkõige GNV ja Moby – on saanud kasu tegevuskahju hüvitamiseks mõeldud kapitali suurendamisest.
In this sense, RAS recalls that Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council explicitly lays down that national authorities may entrust an internal operator/department with the provision of transport services, without tendering of a public service contract.
Mõni neist toimingutest on eeldatavasti leidnud aset üheaegselt Sardiinia maakonna poolt Saremari kasuks võetud meetme rakendamisega.
Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council equally foresees the possibility for public authorities to take ‘emergency measures in case of interruption of the services or risk of interruption of the services’, which can take the form of the ‘direct award of a public service contract or the commonly agreed prolongation of a public service contract’.
HUVITATUD ISIKUTE MÄRKUSED
According to RAS, this view was confirmed by the Commission in the framework of the infringement procedure concerning non-observance by Italy of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage) (hereinafter the Maritime Cabotage Regulation), in which context the Commission stated that ‘were the regions to operate the service in-house within the meaning of the ANAV case law (C-410/04) with the observance of all relevant requirements, the Maritime Cabotage Regulation would be considered complied with’.
Moby väidab, et Saremaril oli võimalik teenindada saart mandriga ühendavat kaht laevaliini 2011. ja 2012. aastal kuludest madalamate hindadega ainult tänu Sardiinia maakonna antud toetusele.
RAS underlines that the selection of the routes to be operated by Saremar was made on the basis of a feasibility study which took due account of the need to guarantee territorial continuity and ensure economic viability of the activity.
Moby väidab, et Saremari äärmiselt madalad hinnad on turu struktuuri märkimisväärselt muutnud.
As recalled by subsequent Decisions 25/69/EC and 27/4/EC, it was on the basis of this study and the market information gathered by Saremar that the Civitavecchia — Golfo Aranci and Vado Ligure — Porto Torres routes have been activated for the high season, namely from 15 June to 15 September 2011 and from 22 June to 15 September 2012 respectively.
Kuni 2011. aastani kõnealustel liinidel tegutsenud eraettevõtjatel, nagu GNV või Forship (Sardinia Ferries), ei olnud muud võimalust kui turult lahkuda.
RAS also recalls that the operation of the Genova — Porto Torres and Civitavecchia — Olbia routes in the summer season falls outside the scope of the new Convention concluded by the Italian State with CIN and is therefore not subject to PSOs to guarantee affordability of the services.
Moby sõnul ei ole meedet võimalik põhjendada üldsuse huviga vähemalt kahel põhjusel.
At any rate, that new Convention allows for the revision of the prices to account for increases in costs (in particular bunker costs), and would not therefore guarantee the affordability of the services to Sardinian residents.
Esiteks võttis Itaalia 18. juulil 2012 CINiga uut lepingut sõlmides arvesse kõiki õiguspäraseid avalike teenustega seotud huvisid; leping hõlmas avaliku teenindamise kohustuste täitmist Sardiinia ja Itaalia mandriosa vahelistel liinidel.
According to RAS, trial operation of the two routes to the mainland was definitely terminated in September 2012.
Uues lepingus sätestati Genova — Porto Torrese ja Civitavecchia–Olbia liini avaliku teenindamise kohustus madalhooajal (aasta ringi, välja arvatud juunist septembrini) vähemalt iga päev.
RAS then elaborated a structured project for operation of links to the mainland, which was pre-notified to the Commission, namely the Flotta Sarda project.
Teiseks ei ole meetmega seotud tõelist avaliku teenindamise huvi, sest kaks kõnealust liini on oma olemuselt kommertsliinid.
A new company, Flotta Sarda S.p.A.
Lisaks madalhooajale on Saremar liine teenindanud ka 2011. ja 2012. aasta tipphooajal, kui turul tegutses ka mitu muud ettevõtjat.
(Flotta Sarda), entirely held and financed by RAS, will be set up, to be entrusted with the provision under a public service regime of maritime transport services on four routes connecting Sardinia to mainland Italy.
Kõnealused liinid jäeti uue lepingu reguleerimisalast välja just nende ärilise olemuse tõttu suvehooajal.
Flotta Sarda will receive annual compensation to cover public service costs.
Lisaks ei määratleta ülesande andmise õigusaktides kõnealuseid teenuseid selgesõnaliselt üldist majandushuvi pakkuvate teenustena ning need ei anna ettevõtjale õigust hüvitisele.
The fact that the Regional Decisions instructing Saremar to start operation of the routes in question do not provide for its right to compensation does not affect observance of the second Altmark criterion.
Peale selle tegi Sardiinia maakond teenuste osutamise ülesandeks otse Saremarile, ilma eelneva pakkumismenetluseta.
Public authorities need not define ex-ante the precise amount of compensation to be granted for the operation of public services.
Moby leiab, et hüvitis ei olnud põhjendatud ja mingil juhul ei vastanud see Saremari kahjumile teenuste osutamisel.
Rather, it is sufficient that they identify beforehand the means of calculation of eligible costs, to the extent that these costs are directly attributable to the discharge of the SGEIs.
Moby arvates on Saremarile reklaamitegevuse jaoks antud 2479000 euro suurune toetus (ilma käibemaksuta) ilmselgelt ebaproportsionaalne.
Indeed, in the present case, when RAS decided to instruct Saremar to set up connections to the mainland, it had considered that the operation of such services would not result in losses.
Lisaks ei saa summa 80 % kohest ettemaksu lugeda äris tavapäraseks.
RAS points out that since the operation of the services in question was subject to separate accounting, the net costs incurred in the provision of the public service, could be easily identified.
Moby väidab, et kõnealune summa kujutas endast samuti Saremarile antavat abi.
Saremar operated the public services in question under separate accounting.
Lõpuks ei olnud amet korraldanud reklaamiteenustega seoses eelnevalt pakkumismenetlust.
RAS takes the view that this is sufficient to ensure that the public resources were used only to compensate the operator for the deficit registered.
Teise kinnituskirjaga seoses (vt põhjendus 87) tuletab Moby meelde, et otsusega 52/119 kinnitas Sardiinia maakond, et teenuse pakkumise alustamiseks Civitavecchia–Olbia liinil on vaja võtta MPS pangast kohe laenu ja et pank oli küsinud Sardiinia maakonnalt tagatist.
In RAS's view, Saremar was therefore not overcompensated.
See, et kinnituskiri võeti otsusega 12/15 ametlikult tagasi, ei ole meetme liigitamisel riigiabiks oluline, sest MPS pank oli seda selgesõnaliselt nõudnud ja see oli juba mõju avaldanud.
RAS defends that the fourth Altmark condition is fulfilled given that the vessels employed on the routes had been leased following a market consultation and bunker costs observe market rates.
Moby toetab täielikult komisjoni algset seisukohta rekapitaliseerimise suhtes.
ISSUES REGARDING COMPATIBILITY
Samuti tegi rekapitaliseerimine MPS panga laenu Saremarile hõlpsamini kättesaadavaks ning seetõttu sarnaneb selle mõju tagatise mõjuga, mis annab seega Saremarile majandusliku eelise.
RAS submits that Saremar's qualification as internal operator precludes application of the non-discrimination condition laid down by the Maritime Cabotage Regulation and the award of the public service to Saremar does not therefore infringe the 2005 nor the 2011 SGEI Decisions.
MUUD MEETMED
RAS explains that the measure had been defined in all its essential elements already in April 2011.
Moby viitab ka täiendavale neljale miljonile eurole, mille Sardiinia maakond andis Saremarile oktoobris 2011.
Any aid put into effect before the entry into force of the 2011 SGEI Decision should be assessed on the basis of the 2005 SGEI Decision.
Eeldatavasti täiendas summa toetust, mida riik maksis tegevuskulude suurenemise tulemusena väikesaarte ja Korsika liinidel, mida Saremar teenindas algse pikendatud lepingu alusel.
RAS assumes that the compatibility conditions laid down therein are complied with.
Moby väidab, et kõnealune meede kujutab endast lisaabi Saremarile, millest komisjoni eelnevalt ei teavitatud.
In particular:
Moby arvates on kõik hinnatavad meetmed ebaseaduslikud ja Saremarile antud abi on siseturuga kokkusobimatu.
the service was entrusted to Saremar on the basis of transparent, non-discriminatory conditions within the meaning of the Maritime Cabotage Regulation;
TEISED HUVITATUD ISIKUD
the ceilings in Article 2(1)(a) and (c) of the 2005 SGEI Decision are observed: the subsidy is below EUR 30 million and less than 300000 passengers were carried on each route;
Ükski teine huvitatud isik ei ole menetlustähtaja jooksul käesolevas otsuses käsitletud meetmete kohta märkusi esitanud.
the services have lawfully been qualified as SGEIs and entrusted to Saremar by means of several entrustment acts, in accordance with Article 4 thereof;
Uurimise hilisemas etapis esitas GNV 3. juulil 2013 komisjonile kaks dokumenti: i) kohtu määratud eksperdi aruande seoses kohtuprotsessiga tsiviilasjas, mille algatas GNV Genova kohtus Saremari vastu ja ii) 11. juuni 2013. aasta kohtumääruse aruande kinnitamise kohta.
the compensation granted to Saremar for the operation of the routes to the mainland does not exceed what is necessary to cover costs incurred in the operation of the services, in line with Article 6 thereof.
Ekspert käsitles kolme praeguse riigiabi hindamise seisukohast olulist küsimust, mis lisati aruandesse: i) kas rekapitaliseerimine andis saart mandriga ühendavat kaht liini teenindavale äriüksusele eelise või mitte, ii) rekapitaliseerimise vastavus turumajandusliku investeerimise põhimõttele ning iii) Saremarile reklaami jaoks makstud toetuse vastavus turutingimustele.
RAS submits that the measure would, in any event, also comply with the 2011 SGEI Decision, given that:
Aruande kohaselt oli rekapitaliseerimise eesmärk tagada äriühingu toimimine, arvestades, et algse lepingu pikendamine järgmiseks 12 kuuks ja seega ka toetuse maksmine järgmiseks aastaks oli teadmata.
the second ceiling laid down by Article 2(1)(d) thereof is observed;
Aruanne tugineb 2011. aasta bilansiga kinnitatud dokumendile, milles tuletatakse meelde, et saart Itaalia mandriosaga ühendava kahe liini tegevuskahjum oli 2011. aastal 214000 eurot ning et Tirrenia erastamisega seotud ebaselguse tõttu ei olnud teada ka riigi toetused.
the service was entrusted to Saremar following technical discussions with private operators.
Edasi öeldakse aruandes, et Saremari kogukasum 2011. aastal oli 2523439 eurot.
Furthermore, RAS had received numerous complaints regarding the service provided by private operators;
See sisaldas riigiga sõlmitud lepingu alusel teenindavatelt liinidelt teenitud kasumit 2737797 eurot ja saart mandriga ühendavatelt liinidelt saadud kahjumit 214358 eurot.
the compensation takes into account the net costs the operator incurred in the operation of the service;
Samuti leidis ekspert, et äriühingu ebakindla seisundi tõttu ei vastanud rekapitaliseerimine turumajandusliku investeerimise põhimõttele, sest äriühing oli kaotanud rohkem kui kolmandiku oma registreeritud kapitalist, tegutses karmi konkurentsiga turul, ja selle ärilised väljavaated olid piiratud.
transparency requirements have been observed given that the Regional Decisions on the matter were published.
Ta oli arvamusel, et erainvestor ei oleks väga tõenäoliselt sellisesse tegevusse investeerinud.
Ultimately, RAS submits that the measure cannot be held to distort competition to an extent contrary to Union interest, given that it aims to ensure territorial continuity and is limited to the deficit incurred in the operation of SGEIs.
Reklaamitegevuse hinna vastavuse kohta turuväärtusele märkis ekspert, et äriühingu 2011. aasta bilansi kohaselt oli Saremar saanud saart mandriga ühendavaid liine teenindavate laevadega seoses reklaamiteenuste jaoks 2479000 eurot hüvitist.
According to RAS, the subsidy for promotional activities corresponds to the services effectively rendered by Saremar and does not therefore provide any undue economic advantage to the company.
Hinna turuväärtusele vastavuse analüüsimiseks jagas ta transporditeenuse osutamisel tekkinud kulud reisijate arvuga.
RAS holds that, when assessing the conformity of the price with market conditions, due account has to be taken of the fact that the promotional activities in question have not been limited to the 2011 high season as originally foreseen, but eventually extended to 2012.
Tulemuseks saadud maksumust 18,47 eurot reisija kohta peeti sedalaadi reklaami tavamaksumusega võrreldes liiga kõrgeks, seda enam, et reklaam oli suunatud pardal olevatele reisijatele, kes olid Sardiinia juba turismisihtkohaks valinud.
The expert came to the conclusion that the market value of the promotional activities carried out by Saremar in 2011 and 2012 would range between EUR 2458168 and EUR 2609631 (VAT excluded).
GNV on esitanud komisjonile ka Saremari märkused riikliku menetluse käigus esitatud aruande kohta.
Hence, RAS considers that the price it paid to Saremar was justified.
Oma märkustes rõhutas Saremar, et Itaalia konkurentsiamet oli juba kinnitanud, et tema turuosa Sardiiniat Itaalia mandriosaga ühendavate mereveoteenuste turul oli jäänud tagasihoidlikuks ning seepärast ei saanud ta eelnevaid turutingimusi mõjutada.
Market costs have been benchmarked against average advertising costs per square meter estimated based on parameters such as duration (certain discounts for the continuation of the advertising campaign in 2012 were taken into account), type of the advertising (internal or external) and location (main cities, important influx of population, mobility areas).
Saremar rõhutas, et rekapitaliseerimise ajal oli äriühingu olukord riiklike toetuste kärpimise (enam kui mõõduka) ohu tõttu kriitiline.
RAS submits that, were the price paid to Saremar for the promotional activities to be considered excessive, the advantage conferred on the company would be limited to the difference between the price actually paid and the market value of the services.
Kuna riik ei saanud äriühingut toetada (ka mitte juhtimisel), oli äriühingu finantsseisund küllaltki murettekitav.
Finally, RAS considers that the compatibility of any such aid would have to be assessed on the basis of Article 106(2) TFEU.
Saremari sõnul ei ole eraettevõtjatega võrdlemine seetõttu kohane.
RAS asserts that the EUR 3 million credit line obtained by Saremar did not involve any regional funds.
ITAALIA MÄRKUSED HUVITATUD ISIKUTE MÄRKUSTE KOHTA
It was granted to Saremar at market rates by BS bank, a private financial institution.
Itaalia ei esitanud Sardiinia maakonna poolt Saremari kasuks võetud meetmeid käsitlevate huvitatud isikute märkuste kohta oma tähelepanekuid.
However, the credit line has not been activated by Saremar, with the result that the letter of comfort of July 2011, issued in accordance with Decision 23/2/EC, expired on 30 November 2011.
HINNANG
Given that the letter of comfort was not linked to any financial obligation of the company, it cannot be qualified as a guarantee.
ABI OLEMASOLU EUROOPA LIIDU TOIMIMISE LEPINGU ARTIKLI 107 LÕIKE 1 TÄHENDUSES
The second comfort letter, approved by Decision 52/119/EC, was not issued, and therefore no binding obligation in favour of Saremar was taken on by RAS.
Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 kohaselt „on igasugune liikmesriigi poolt või riigi ressurssidest ükskõik missugusel kujul antav abi, mis kahjustab või ähvardab kahjustada konkurentsi, soodustades teatud ettevõtjaid või teatud kaupade tootmist, siseturuga kokkusobimatu niivõrd, kuivõrd see kahjustab liikmesriikidevahelist kaubandust.“
In fact, the financial transaction provided for by Decision 52/119/EC (EUR 5 million overdraft facility) has never been completed.
Täpsemalt peaks rahaline toetus
As recalled by Decision 12/15/EC, the loan contracted with the MPS bank has been requested and obtained by Saremar without being guaranteed by RAS.
olema saadud riigilt või riiklikest vahenditest;
RAS underlines that the recapitalisation bears no connection to the operation by Saremar of the two routes to mainland Italy.
soodustama teatud ettevõtjaid või teatud kaupade tootmist;
The measure rather concerns the services operated by Saremar to minor islands and Corsica under the initial Convention, as prolonged.
moonutama konkurentsi või ähvardama seda moonutada;
The EUR 11,5 million laid down by Decision 36/6/EC corresponds to the claim filed against Tirrenia in insolvency proceedings.
kahjustama liikmesriikide vahelist kaubandust.
This amount however refers to financial operations within the Tirrenia Group dating back to before 2009.
HÜVITIS SARDIINIA JA ITAALIA MANDRIOSA VAHELISE KAHE TÄIENDAVA LIINI TEENINDAMISE EEST
This amount would have been therefore already authorised in 2004, when the Commission adopted its final decision on the initial Conventions up to end 2008.
Riiklikud vahendid
To date the recapitalisation has only partially been carried out.
Riigiabina käsitlemiseks peab finantsmeede olema riigiga seostatav ja pärinema otseselt või kaudselt riiklikest vahenditest.
By Decision of 15 June 2012, Saremar's Shareholders Assembly decided to increase capital of the company from EUR 1209010,64 to EUR 6099961, by issuing 307765 ordinary shares of a nominal value of EUR 19,82.
Sardiinia maakond maksis Saremarile kahe mereliini teenindamise eest hüvitist maakonna eelarvest.
On 11 July 2012 RAS increased Saremar's capital by only EUR 824309,6.
Seepärast on hüvitis seostatav riigiga ja antud riigi vahendite kaudu.