natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is noted that the main car producers have production plants and purchase organisations in the US and in the Union, i.e. the same company groups are operating in both markets and it is likely that they will apply the same strategies when confronted to high volumes of low prices imports from China.
Seetõttu väitsid nad, et Hiinast pärineva impordi olulise kasvu risk puudub, kui meetmed peaksid kehtivuse kaotama.
One interested party claimed that available spare capacities in China only concern aluminium wheels for the AM segment, and that there would be no spare capacities available for OEM wheels, where the demand has been increasing.
Esiteks oli komisjoni analüüsi eesmärk, mida kirjeldati ka põhjenduses 179, selgitada välja sobivate tooteliikide hinnaerinevused ELi turul ja muude kolmandate riikide turgudel, et saada aimu Hiina impordi võimalikust hinnatasemest liidu turul, kui meetmed peaksid kehtivuse kaotama, mitte leida hinna allalöömise marginaale.
The volume of the Chinese OEM wheels would therefore be limited and it is not likely that large volumes could be sold on Union market which is predominantly for the OEM segment.
See hinnaerinevus näitab samuti, et Hiina eksportivad tootjad saaksid liidu turule siseneda liidu tootmisharu hindadest märkimisväärselt madalamate hindadega, mis jääksid sellest hoolimata kõrgemaks kui muudel kolmandate riikide turgudel.
This party also questioned how the Chinese spare capacity in the OEM segment has been established and which Chinese producers were considered to be certified.
See kujutab endast Hiina eksportivatele tootjatele tugevat ajendit hakata eksportima ELi turule, eriti kui võtta arvesse Hiina suurt kasutamata tootmisvõimsust.
As explained in recital 177 around 50 % of the Chinese exports to the OEM segment in the Union were made by the non-sampled or non-cooperating exporting producers in China.
Teiseks ei olnud põhjendatud väidet, et eksportivad tootjad peavad muude turgude klientidele tagama täieliku tooteportfelli.
Thus a large part of Chinese exporting producers for which no information was available are certified producers that are currently exporting to the OEM segment in the Union.
Uurimisel ilmnes hoopis vastupidine – tavaliselt toimub hankemenetlus eraldi konkreetse tooteliigi kohta ja kliendid hangivad samu tooteliike eri tarnijatelt.
On this basis it was concluded that at least some of the Chinese spare capacity will be available for exports to the Union's OEM segment already in a short term.
See ei toeta väiteid, nagu peaks samale kliendile pakkuma laialdast tooteliikide portfelli.
Several Chinese exporting producers claimed that the fact that certain product types are lower priced in other export markets could not be seen as an incentive for the Chinese exporting producers to (re-)direct these exports to the Union market should the measures be repealed.
Seetõttu lükatakse kõnealused väited tagasi.
They argued that in the analysis of the Chinese price behaviour the Commission wrongly disregarded product types for which prices of the Chinese exporters to other third country markets were higher than those of the same type sold by the Union industry in the Union market which resulted in a significant overstatement of the potential undercutting which would in reality only amount to 0,45 %.
Samad osapooled väitsid ka, et kaubanduse kaitsemeetmete olemasolu Austraalias ja Indias Hiina alumiiniumrataste tootjate impordi suhtes on tähtsusetu ning kaubanduse kaitsemeetmete olemasolu konkreetsetel turgudel ei võimalda teha järeldusi hinnakujunduse kohta muudel turgudel, mida on võimalik välja selgitada vaid pärast asjaomaste uurimisasutuste poolset uurimist.
Further, these parties claimed that the other export markets would yield higher profits than exports to the Union market and that Chinese exporters need to maintain their business relationships in the Chinese domestic market and on the other third country export markets.
Nimetatud osapooled väitsid veel, et kaubanduse kaitsemeetmeid kehtestatakse andmete põhjal, mis viitavad minevikus toimunud uurimisperioodile, samas kui aegumise läbivaatamine peaks põhinema ettepoole suunatud analüüsil.
They also claimed that the Chinese exporters must be able to supply a complete portfolio of products to their customers in those markets and would therefore not have an incentive to re-direct exports of certain product types to the Union merely on the basis that prices are higher in the Union market.
Lõpetuseks väitsid nimetatud osapooled, et India ja Austraalia oleksid Hiina eksportivate tootjate jaoks väikesed eksporditurud ning hoolimata meetmete kehtestamisest oleks eksport nimetatud sihtkohtadesse jäänud vastavate omamaiste tootmisharude piisavast tootmisvõimsuse puudumisest tulenevalt stabiilseks.
Consequently they claimed that there would be no risk of a significant increase in imports from China, should measures be allowed to lapse.
Seega väitsid osapooled, et dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtestamine nimetatud riikides ei viita ekspordi võimalikule ümbersuunamisele nendelt turgudelt ELi.
First, the objective of the Commission's analysis described in recital 179 was to establish the differences between prices charged to the Union market on the one hand and those charged to other third country markets on the other hand for matching product types to have an indication of the likely price levels of the Chinese imports in the Union market should the measures be repealed, and not to establish undercutting margins.
Vastupidiselt esitatud väitele ei ole komisjon kasutanud Austraalia ega India uuringuid, et demonstreerida dumpingu jätkumise tõenäosust Euroopa Liidu turul.
This price differential also shows that Chinese exporting producers can enter the Union market at prices significantly lower than the Union industry's prices while being still at a higher level than those to other third country markets.
Siiski näitab kaubanduse kaitsemeetmete olemasolu neil turgudel, et pääs nimetatud turgudele on piiratud.
This constitutes a strong incentive for the Chinese exporting producers to export to the Union market, also taking into consideration, inter alia, the large spare capacity in China.
Mis puudutab ekspordi võimalikku ümbersuunamist liidu turule, ei ole Austraaliat hinnangulistesse mahtudesse sisse arvestatud.
Second, the claim that exporting producers need to supply a complete portfolio of products to customers in other markets was not substantiated.
Kuna Indias kehtestati dumpinguvastased meetmed alles 2015. aastal, oli nende täpse mõju kohta veel vara järeldusi teha.
The investigation showed, to the contrary, that usually the tendering procedure takes place for each product type separately and that customers are sourcing from several suppliers the same product types which does not support the allegations made that a large portfolio of product types must be offered to the same customer.
Siiski, nagu eespool mainitud, on tõenäoline, et vähemalt osa nendest kogustest suunatakse ümber liidu turule.
Therefore these claims are rejected.
Lisaks sellele oli India läbivaatamisega seotud uurimisperioodil Hiina eksportivatele tootjatele üheks suurimaks ekspordituruks, olles samal tasemel kui Hiina kogueksport ELi sama perioodi jooksul, ning seetõttu ei ole see tähtsusetu.
The same parties also claimed that the existence of trade defence measures against imports of Chinese ARW in Australia and India is irrelevant and that the existence of trade defence measures in specific markets does not allow concluding on pricing practices into other markets that could only be established following an investigation by the relevant investigating authorities.
Samad osapooled kinnitasid lisaks, et dumpinguvastaste meetmete puudumine USAs näitab, et Hiina eksportivad tootjad ei tegele nimetatud turul ebaõiglase kaubandustegevusega.
These parties further claimed that trade defence measures are imposed on the basis of data referring to an investigation period in the past, whereas an expiry review should be based on a forward-looking analysis.
Lisaks väitsid osapooled, et Hiina ja ka muudest riikidest pärit impordi kasv USAs tulenes pelgalt USA omamaise tootmisharu poolsest tarne puudujäägist.
Finally, according to these parties India and Australia would only be minor export markets for the Chinese exporting producers and despite the imposition of measures exports to these destinations would have remained stable due to the lack of sufficient capacity of the respective domestic industries.
Nimetatud osapooled kinnitasid, et teatavate suurte USA tootjate pankrotistumine 2009. aastal tulenes ülemaailmsest finantskriisist, mitte Hiina impordist.
Therefore these parties claimed that the imposition of anti-dumping measures in these countries would not indicate any potential re-direction of exports from those markets to the Union.
Lõpetuseks väitsid osapooled, et hoolimata asjaolust, et USA peamiste autotootjate tootmisüksused ja ostuettevõtted asuvad USAs ja ELis, st samad kontsernid tegutsevad mõlemal turul, ei ole tõenäoline, et nad rakendaksid Hiina impordi suhtes mõlemal turul samu strateegiaid.
Contrary to the claim, the Commission has not used the Australian or Indian investigations to demonstrate the likelihood of continuation of dumping on the Union market.
Esiteks ei olnud komisjonil kavatsust välja selgitada, kas USAs leidub Hiina eksportivatelt tootjatelt pärinevaid ebaõiglaselt hinnastatud kaupu.
However the existence of trade defence measures on these markets shows that the access to these markets is limited.
Siiski näitab olukord USAs, et Hiina odava impordiga kokku puutudes vahetasid kasutajad tarnijaid ja omamaine tootmisharu vastaval turul suures osas kadus.
As regards the potential exports to be redirected to the Union, Australia has not been included in the estimated volumes.
Uurimise käigus tuvastati, et Hiina impordi eeldatav hinnatase liidus, kui meetmed kehtivuse kaotaksid, oleks 8–30 % madalam kui liidu tootmisharu praegune hinnatase.
As regards India, due to the fact that the anti-dumping measures were imposed only in 2015 it was too early to conclude about a precise impact.
Lisaks sellele leiti, et liidu turule suunatud eksport toimuks tõenäoliselt oluliste dumpinguhindadega.
However, as mentioned above, it is likely that at least some of these quantities are re-directed to the Union market.
Väited, et USA omamaiste tootjate sulgemine ja USA tootmisharu turuosa kaotamine ei olnud seotud mitte Hiina impordi pealetungi, vaid finantskriisiga, olid põhjendamata ja lükati seetõttu tagasi.
Furthermore, India was one of the biggest export markets for the Chinese exporting producers during the RIP, which is at the same level as the total Chinese exports to the Union during the same time and are therefore not insignificant.
Õigupoolest õnnestus Hiina eksportivatel tootjatel isegi majanduslanguse olukorras suurendada oma turuosa USAs.
The same parties claimed in addition that the absence of anti-dumping measure in place in the US would show that there are no unfair trade practises by the Chinese exporting producers in this market.
Seega, isegi kui finants- ja majanduskriis avaldas USA omamaiste tootjate olukorrale mõju, muutis selle oluliselt raskemaks Hiina odav import.
Further, these parties claimed that the increase of Chinese imports, as well as imports from other third countries, in the US was merely linked to a shortage of supply by the domestic industry in the US market.
Samuti ei olnud põhjendatud väidet, et samad autotootjad kasutavad liidus ja USAs erinevaid hankestrateegiaid, ning seetõttu lükati see tagasi.
These parties claimed that the bankruptcy of certain large US producers in 2009 was due to the global financial crisis rather than to the Chinese imports.
Nagu on selgitatud põhjenduses 181, tegutsevad ja ostavad peamised autotootjad oma tootmisüksuste tarbeks rattaid nii USA kui ka ELi turul ning puuduvad objektiivsed põhjused, miks nad peaksid Hiinast pärineva impordi suhtes rakendama erinevaid strateegiaid, kui tollimaksud tühistatakse ja hinnad kasutajale on mõlemal turul samal tasemel.
Finally, these parties claimed that despite the fact that main car producers in the US have production plants and purchase organisations in the US and in the Union, i.e. the same company groups are operating in both markets, it would not be likely that they would apply the same strategies in both markets with regard to Chinese imports.
Seetõttu jääb komisjon seisukoha juurde, et areng USA turul näitab tõenäolist arengut ka liidu turul, kui meetmed kehtetuks muutuksid.
First, the Commission's intention was not to establish whether there were unfairly priced imports from Chinese exporting producers in the US.
Hiina hinnad liidu turul
However, the situation in the US shows that, if confronted with Chinese low priced imports, users switched suppliers and the domestic industry was largely disappearing from that market.
Nagu on märgitud põhjenduses 123, oleksid valimisse kaasatud Hiina eksportivate tootjate impordihinnad, millest on maha arvestatud dumpinguvastased meetmed, löönud ELi tootmisharu müügihinnad alla 8,0 % võrra.
The investigation established that the expected price level of Chinese imports in the Union should measures be allowed to lapse would be between 8 to 30 % lower than the current Union industry's price level.
Järelturu ja algseadmete tootja segmentide eraldi vaatlemisel olid tulemused selgepiirilisemad, st 12,4 % järelturu segmendi ja 8,7 % algseadmete tootja segmendi puhul.
The export prices to the Union market were furthermore found to be likely made at significant dumped levels.
Võttes Eurostati andmete alusel arvesse ka valimisse mittekaasatud eksportivad tootjad, oleks allalöömise marginaal 7,5 %.
The claims that the closure of the domestic producers in the US and loss of market share of the US industry was unrelated to the surge of the Chinese imports but rather linked to the financial crisis was unsubstantiated and is therefore rejected.
Mis puudutab importi seestöötlemise korras, nagu on mainitud põhjenduses 124, siis keskmine allalöömise marginaal jäi hinnanguliselt samasse vahemikku (7,6 %).
Indeed, even in a situation of an economic down-turn the Chinese exporting producers managed to increase their market shares in the US.
Siiski tasub meelde tuletada, et nagu ka põhjenduses 124 märgitud, põhineb viimane keskmistel hindadel, ei tee vahet erinevatel tooteliikidel ning vastab väga väikesele kogusele – läbivaatamisega seotud uurimisperioodil oli selleks 0,6 % liidu tarbimisest.
Therefore, even if the financial and economic crisis may have had an impact on the situation of the US domestic producers, the increase in Chinese low-priced imports accentuated this situation significantly.
Seevastu, nagu märgitud põhjenduses 179, põhines erinevus Hiinast USA, Jaapani ja India turgudele eksporditava kauba ja liidu tootmisharu hindade vahel koostööd tegevate Hiina eksportivate tootjate andmetel ning arvutustes on võetud arvesse erinevaid tooteliike.
Also the claim that the same car manufacturers would apply different sourcing strategies in the Union than in the US was not substantiated and is therefore rejected.
Seetõttu olid arvutused täpsemad ning neid loetakse paremaks näitajaks Hiina eksportivate tootjate võimalike tulevaste valitsevate hinnatasemete kohta meetmete kaotamisel, kui arvutusi seestöötlemismenetluse korras imporditud toodete hindade kohta, mis põhinesid keskmistel näitajatel.
As explained in recital 181 the main car producers operate and buy wheels for their production plants in both the US and the Union and there are no objective reasons why they would employ different strategies with regard to imports from China in case the duties are repealed and the prices to the users are on the same level on both markets.
Mõju liidu tootmisharu olukorrale
It is therefore maintained that the development in the US market demonstrates the likely development of the market situation in the Union should measures be repealed.
Eespool toodud asjaolude põhjal saab järeldada, et meetmete kehtetuks muutumise korral on tõenäoline, et Hiinast pärit import taastub märkimisväärses mahus ning dumpinguhindadega, mis lööksid liidu tootmisharu hinnad tugevalt (8 % kuni 30 % võrra) alla, avaldades turule survet hindade alandamiseks.
Chinese prices in the Union market
Tõenäoline on Hiina eksportivate tootjate strateegia müüa liidu turul hindadega, mis jäävad 8–30 % võrra alla liidu tootmisharu müügihindadele, kuna see võimaldaks neil võita turuosa Euroopa Liidus, mis on atraktiivne turg, võimaldades samal ajal endiselt müüa kõrgemate hindadega kui USA turul (ja muudes kolmandates riikides).
As mentioned in recital 123 the import prices of the sampled Chinese exporting producers in the Union market, anti-dumping measures deducted, would have undercut the Union industry sales price by 8,0 %.
Selle tulemusena kaotaks liidu tootmisharu tõenäoliselt tootmis- ja müügimahtu ja ka turuosa ELi turul.
When analysing the AM and OEM segment separately, the results were more pronounced, i.e. 12,4 % for the AM segment and 8,7 % for the OEM segment.
Niisugusel arengul oleks tõenäoliselt kahjulik mõju ELi tootmisharu olukorrale, kuna tootmisharu puhul, millel on paindumatu kulude struktuur ja kõrged fikseeritud kulud, avaldab tootmis- ja müügimahtude kahanemine koos müügihindade langusega kasumlikkusele selgelt negatiivset mõju.
Concerning the non-sampled exporting producers based on Eurostat data, the undercutting margin would be 7,5 %.
See leidis aset ka esialgse uurimise käigus, mil Hiina hinnatasemed langesid 8 % võrra ja tõid kaasa Hiina impordimahu kasvu 3,7 miljonilt 6,1 miljonile ühikule (vastates turuosa kasvule 6,3 %-lt 12,4 %-le) ja tekitas liidu tootmisharule olulist kahju.
Regarding imports under the inward processing regime, as mentioned in recital 124, the average undercutting margin was found to be at the same range (7,6 %).
Toona reageeris liidu tootmisharu langusega tootmises (– 24 %), müügis (– 21 %) ja hindades (– 6 %), mis sundis kasumlikkust kukkuma 3,2 %-lt – 5,4 %-le.
However, it is recalled that as also mentioned in recital 124 the latter is based on average prices, not distinguishing between different product types and correspond only to a very low quantity, namely 0,6 % of the Union consumption during the RIP.
Hiina hindade langus esialgsel uurimisperioodil vastab hinna allalöömismarginaalile, mis leiti läbivaatamisega seotud uurimisperioodil koostööd teinud Hiina eksportivate tootjate impordi puhul, kui dumpinguvastased tollimaksud maha arvestati.
By contrast and as mentioned in recital 179 the price difference between the Chinese prices to US, Japan and India with the Union industry prices were based on information provided by the cooperating Chinese exporting producers and the calculations have taken into consideration the different product types.
Arvestades USA turule (ja muude kolmandate riikide turgudele) eksporditava kauba oluliselt madalamat hinnataset, on tõenäoline, et Hiina impordi hinnalangus oleks meetmete tühistamise korral ilmselt suurem.
Therefore, these calculations were more precise and considered as a better indication of possible future prevailing price levels of Chinese exporting producers should measures lapse, than the calculations of prices for the imports under the inward processing regime that were based on mere averages.
Konservatiivse stsenaariumi kohaselt, mille alusel langeksid Hiina impordi hinnatasemed 15 % võrra, oleks mõju liidu tootmisharu kasumlikkusele tõenäoliselt oluliselt suurem kui see, mida sai vaadelda esialgsel uurimisperioodil, ning see võib tähendada langust umbes 16 % võrra.
Effect on the Union industry situation
Mõned huvitatud osapooled väitsid, et viide liidu tootmisharu olukorrale esialgse uurimisperioodi ajal ei ole asjakohane, arvestades oluliselt muutunud turuolukorda ja praegust vajadust impordi järele, et katta liidu nõudlust.
Based on the above facts, it can be concluded that if measures are repealed it is likely that imports from China will resume in significant volumes and at dumped prices likely to significantly undercut the Union industry prices (between a range of 8 % to around 30 %) thus exerting a downward price pressure in the market.
Väideti, et liidu nõudlus kasvab jätkuvalt ning ületab üha enam liidu tootmisharu tootmisvõimsust.
A strategy of the Chinese exporting producers to sell in the Union market at a price which is between 8-30 % lower than the Union industry sales price is likely because that would allow them to gain market share in the Union which is an attractive market, at the same time still allowing them to sell at higher prices than in the US (and other third country markets).
Seega ei oleks impordi suurenemise võimalikud mõjud samad kui esialgse uurimise perioodil.
As a consequence, the Union industry is likely to lose production and sales volume as well as market shares in the Union market.
Uurimine näitas tõepoolest, et olukord ELi turul on pärast esialgset uurimist muutunud.
This development is likely to have injurious effects on the situation of the Union industry as in this type of industry, which has an inelastic cost structure and high fixed costs, a decrease in production and sales volumes, combined with a reduction in sales prices, will clearly have a negative impact on the profitability.
Eriti näitas käesoleva uurimise käigus vaadeldud perioodil kasvutrendi tarbimine, samas kui esialgse uurimise perioodil tarbimine kahanes.
This occurred in the original investigation when Chinese price levels dropped by 8 % which led to an increase in volumes of Chinese imports from 3,7 million to 6,1 million units (corresponding to an increase in market share from 6,3 % to 12,4 %) and caused material injury to the Union industry.
Teisalt ilmnes uurimisel ka, et liidu tootmisharu kasvatas tootmisvõimsust ja jätkab sellega, et tulla toime suureneva tarbimisega ja ennetada seega liidu tarbimise ja tootmisvõimsuse vahelise lõhe süvenemist.
At the time the Union industry reacted with a decrease in production (– 24 %), in sales (– 21 %) and in prices (– 6 %) which had an impact on profitability that dropped from 3,2 % to – 5,4 %.
Hoolimata teatud huvitatud osapoolte väidetest, et alumiiniumrataste turgu suunab klientide nõudlus teatud tehniliste omaduste järele, ilmnes uurimisel veel, et turul tegutsevate tarnijate vahel valitseb ka karm hinnakonkurents.
The Chinese price decrease in the original investigation corresponds to the undercutting margin found during the RIP for imports made by the cooperating Chinese exporting producers when deducting the anti-dumping duties found.
Seda kinnitab ka asjaolu, et liidu tootmisharu ei saanud tarbimiskasvust täit kasu ja suutis vaid oma turuosa, mis vaatlusperioodil pisut vähenes, võrdlemisi stabiilsena hoida.
Given the significant lower price levels to the US market (and other third country markets), it is likely that the price decrease of the Chinese imports, should measures be repealed will, however, likely be at a higher level.
See näitab, et isegi kasvava tarbimise tingimustes on väär eeldada, et liidu tootmisharu saab sellest automaatselt täit kasu ja suudab täismahus toota.
Under the conservative scenario that price levels of Chinese imports will drop by 15 %, the impact on the Union industry profitability will likely be significantly higher than what was observed in the original investigation and potentially mean a drop of some 16 percentage points.
Esialgse uurimise ajal sisenesid liidu turule madala dumpinguhinnaga importtooted ja võtsid üle liidu tootmisharu turuosad.
Some interested parties claimed that the reference made to the Union industry situation during the original investigation would be irrelevant given the considerable changed market circumstances and the current need for imports to satisfy the Union demand.
Võttes arvesse tõenäolisi hinna allalöömise marginaale (vahemikus 8–30 %) ja Hiina suurt kasutamata tootmisvõimsust, võib eeldada, et madala hinnaga import võtab tarbimiskasvust hoolimata suure tõenäosusega üle liidu tootmisharu kliendid ja turuosa.
It was argued that the demand in the Union will continue to increase and increasingly exceed the capacity of the Union industry.
Seega kujutab esialgsele uurimisele viitamine endast kaalukat võrdlusalust ning osapoolte vastavad väited lükati tagasi.