natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland granted the Landeskontrollverband Rheinland-Pfalz e.V.
Komisjon on seisukohal, et meetmega NI 6 Nordmilch eG-le antud abi, meetmega RP 2 MUH Arla eG-le ja Hochwald Foods GmbH-le antud abi ning meetmega RP 2 antud abi korduvaks osalemiseks teataval messil või näitusel ei ole siseturuga kokkusobiv (vt põhjendused 290 ja 310).
(LKVRP) and LVMS, respectively, financial support for consulting and training programmes for milk producers to improve the hygiene of milking equipment and the quality of delivered milk.
See abi tuleb sisse nõuda,
Ongoing consulting services were excluded from funding (see paragraph 92).
ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE
Advising and training milk producers falls within the scope of point 14 (Provision of technical assistance) of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Artikkel 1
The subsidised costs (see paragraphs 92 and 94) correspond to the eligible costs pursuant to point 14.1.
Abi, mida Saksamaa andis 28. novembrist 2001 kuni 31. detsembrini 2006 (meetmed BY 3, BY 10, BW 4, BB 1, BB 3, HE 2, HE 3, HE 9, NI 5, NI 6, NI 7, NW 4, NW 5, NW 6, RP 1, RP 5, SL 2, SL 5, TH 3, TH 4, TH 9, TH 10, BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 ja TH 5) ning 1. jaanuarist 2007 kuni 17. juulini 2013 (meede RP 2) vastuolus ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõikega 3, on siseturuga kokkusobiv, välja arvatud artiklis 2 nimetatud abijuhtumid.
According to the German authorities, the offer of consultancy/training services was open to all milk producers in Rhineland-Palatinate/Saarland as membership in the LKVRP/LVMS, respectively, was not required (see paragraph 94) [72].
Artikkel 2
The requirements of point 14.2 are therefore met.
Abi, mida Saksamaa andis aastatel 2002 ja 2003 meetme NI 6 raames Nordmilch eG-le vastuolus ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõikega 3, ei ole siseturuga kokkusobiv.
The average amounts of funding per year were about EUR 197 [73] in Rhineland-Palatinate and about EUR 130 in Saarland (see paragraph 98).
Abi, mida Saksamaa andis 1. jaanuarist 2007 kuni 17. juulini 2013 meetme RP 2 raames vastuolus ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõikega 3 VKE määratluse alla mittekuuluvatele ettevõtjatele ning eelkõige MUH Arla eG-le ja Hochwald Foods GmbH-le, ei ole siseturuga kokkusobiv.
The upper threshold laid down in point 14.3 could thus not be exceeded.
Abi, mida Saksamaa andis 1. jaanuarist 2007 kuni 17. juulini 2013 meetme RP 2 raames vastuolus ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõikega 3 korduvaks osalemiseks teataval messil või näitusel, ei ole siseturuga kokkusobiv.
The conditions set out in point 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines are thus fulfilled in the case of measure in question.
Artikkel 3
Thuringia granted the Landesvereinigung Thüringer Milch e.V.
Artiklis 2 nimetatud kava alusel antud üksikabi ei loeta riigiabiks siis, kui see vastas andmise ajal tingimustele, mis on ette nähtud nõukogu määruse (EL) 2015/1588 [81] artikli 2 kohaselt vastu võetud ja abi andmise ajal kehtinud määruses.Artikkel 4
(LVTM) financial support for participation in trade and consumer exhibitions and for organising conferences to disseminate scientific information (sub-measure TH 3, see paragraph 100).
Artiklis 2 nimetatud abikava alusel antud üksikabi, mis vastab selle andmise ajal määruse (EL) 2015/1588 artikli 1 kohaselt vastu võetud määruse või ükskõik millise heakskiidetud abikava tingimustele, on siseturuga kokkusobiv seda liiki abi ülemmäära ulatuses.
In addition, the publication of factual information about producers from the region was subsidised (sub-measure TH 4, see paragraph 101).
Artikkel 5
Participation in exhibitions, the organisation of trade conferences and the publication of factual information constitutes technical assistance within the meaning of point 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Saksamaa nõuab artiklis 2 nimetatud abikava alusel antud siseturuga kokkusobimatu abi selle saajatelt sisse.
The subsidised costs (see paragraphs 100 and 101) correspond to the eligible costs pursuant to point 14.1.
Sissenõutavatelt summadelt arvestatakse intressi alates kuupäevast, mil need anti abisaajate käsutusse, kuni nende tegeliku tagasimaksmiseni.
According to Germany, the two sub-measures were not limited to a particular group, but supported the entire dairy sector in a general manner (see paragraphs 105 and 108).
Intress arvutatakse liitintressina vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 794/2004 V peatükile ja komisjoni määrusele (EÜ) nr 271/2008 [82], millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 794/2004.
Furthermore, the German authorities also confirmed that the amounts granted as aid did not exceed the upper threshold laid down in point 14.3 (see paragraphs 105 and 109).
Saksamaa tühistab kõik artiklis 2 nimetatud abikavade alusel tasumata maksed alates käesoleva otsuse vastuvõtmise kuupäevast.
The conditions set out in point 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines are thus fulfilled in the case of the measure in question.
Artikkel 6
Thuringia granted the Verein Landvolksbildung Thüringen (VLT) financial support for the training of employees in dairy farms (sub-measure TH 9).
Artiklis 2 nimetatud kavade alusel antud abi tuleb sisse nõuda viivitamata ja tõhusalt.
Furthermore, Thuringia granted financial support for the Thüringer Landjugendverband e.V.
Saksamaa tagab käesoleva otsuse täitmise nelja kuu jooksul alates selle teatavakstegemisest.
(TLJV) and the Thüringer Melkergemeinschaft e.V.
Artikkel 7
(TMG) for the promotion of professional competitions (sub-measure TH 10) (see paragraph 110).
Kahe kuu jooksul pärast käesoleva otsuse teatavakstegemist esitab Saksamaa komisjonile järgmise teabe:
(284) Initially, Germany argued that these two sub-measures did not constitute State aid since the payments to the VLT (TH 9), the TLJV and the TMG (TH 10) should be considered as service charges which offset equivalent expenses and therefore no advantage arises (see paragraphs 114 and 117).
artiklis 2 nimetatud kavade alusel abi saanud abisaajate nimekiri ja igale abisaajale nende kavade alusel antud abi kogusumma;
However, the Commission is of the opinion that, even if there was no advantage to the service provider, training measures on dairy farms and the organisation of professional competitions benefit dairy farms and represent a form of technical assistance pursuant to point 14 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
igalt abisaajalt sissenõutav kogusumma (põhisumma ja intress);
The subsidised costs (see paragraphs 111 and 112) correspond to the eligible costs in accordance with the provisions of point 14.1.
käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks juba võetud või kavandatavate meetmete üksikasjalik kirjeldus;
According to Germany, the opportunity to participate in training and professional competitions was equally open to all concerned parties who were active in the area concerned, based on objectively defined criteria (see paragraphs 115 and 118).
dokumendid, millega tõendatakse, et abisaajatele on antud korraldus abi tagasi maksta.
Germany stated that the cumulative amount of aid under both these sub-measures did not exceed EUR 100000 over three years (see paragraph 118).
Saksamaa teavitab komisjoni käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks võetud riiklike meetmete edenemisest, kuni artiklis 2 nimetatud kavade alusel antud abi on täies ulatuses tagasi makstud.
The Commission concludes that measures BY 3, BY 10, BW 4, BB 1, BB 3, HE 2, HE 3, HE 9, NI 5, NI 6, NI 7, NW 4, NW 5, NW 6, RP 1, RP 5, SL 2, SL 5, TH 3, TH 4, TH 9 and TH 10, with the exception of aid provided to Nordmilch eG under measure NI 6 (see paragraph 290), satisfied the relevant requirements laid down in the 2000-2006 Guidelines and were therefore compatible with the internal market over the period 2001-2006.
Saksamaa esitab komisjoni taotlusel viivitamata teabe käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks juba võetud ja kavandatavate meetmete kohta.
The Commission also concludes that the aid granted to Nordmilch eG under measure NI 6 in the period 2002-2003 did not meet the relevant conditions of the 2000-2006 Guidelines and was therefore incompatible with the internal market in the period 2001-2006.
Lisaks esitab Saksamaa üksikasjalikud andmed abisaajatelt juba sisse nõutud abisummade ja intresside kohta.
Provision of technical support in the agricultural sector in the period from 2007
Artikkel 8
For the period from 2007, the provisions on the compatibility of technical support with the internal market were amended.
Käesolev otsus on adresseeritud Saksamaa Liitvabariigile.
The provision of technical support is governed by Chapter IV.K of the 2007-2013 Guidelines.
Saksamaa saadab abisaajatele viivitamata käesoleva otsuse koopia.
Pursuant to point 105 of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, the Commission can declare State aid for the provision of technical support to companies processing and marketing agricultural products compatible with Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty [74] if it fulfils all the conditions of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001.
Brüssel, 29. mai 2017
In accordance with paragraph 106 of the same Guidelines, no State aid was approved for large enterprises.
Komisjoni nimel
Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 provides that gross aid for participation in fairs and exhibitions must not exceed 50 % of the additional costs incurred for renting, setting up and running the stand.
komisjoni liige
This exemption applies only to the first participation of an enterprise in a particular fair or exhibition.
EÜ asutamislepingu artiklid 87 ja 88 ning ELi toimimise lepingu artiklid 107 ja 108 on sisult identsed.
Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 was replaced with Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 [75] on 29 August 2008.
Käesolevas otsuses tuleb viiteid ELi toimimise lepingu artiklitele 107 ja 108 käsitada vajaduse korral vastavalt viidetena EÜ asutamislepingu artiklitele 87 ja 88.
Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 provides that aid to SMEs for participation in fairs is compatible with the common market if the aid intensity does not exceed 50 % of eligible costs and if the eligible costs are limited to those incurred for renting, setting up and running the stand for the first participation of an undertaking in any particular fair or exhibition.
Nõukogu 22. märtsi 1999. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 659/1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (ELT L 83, 27.3.1999, lk 1).
According to paragraph 106 of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, no State aid was approved for large enterprises under technical assistance.
Nõukogu 13. juuli 2015. aasta määrus (EL) 2015/1589, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (ELT L 248, 24.9.2015, lk 9).
In the Opening Decision, the Commission expressed doubts regarding the compatibility of a measure (RP 2) with the internal market in the relevant period [76].
Alates 14. novembrist 2015 on tunnistatud selle määrusega kehtetuks ja asendatud määrus (EÜ) nr 659/1999.
Measure RP 2
Vastavalt määruse (EL) 2015/1589 artiklile 35 käsitatakse viiteid kehtetuks tunnistatud määrusele viidetena määrusele (EL) 2015/1589 kooskõlas selle määruse II lisas esitatud vastavustabeliga.
Under measure RP 2, Rhineland-Palatinate granted financial support to processing and marketing companies for participation in forums to share knowledge between businesses, competitions, exhibitions and fairs.
Vt joonealune märkus 3.
Eligible costs were those incurred in setting up an exhibition stand (see paragraph 125).
Viimati 31. augusti 2015. aasta määruse artikliga 397 (Saksa ametlik väljaanne Bundesgesetzblatt, BGBl.
Aid intensity was limited to 10 % of proven costs, but not more than EUR 5200 per business and event (see paragraph 119).
I, lk 1474).
The aid intensity of 10 % under measure RP 2 does not exceed the maximum aid intensity value of 50 % laid down in Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008.
Lk 34–36.
The subsidised costs (costs related to setting up an exhibition stand) correspond to the eligible costs in accordance with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008, which state that renting, setting up and running a stand are eligible for aid (see paragraphs 294 and 295).
Komisjoni 15. detsembri 2006. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 1857/2006, mis käsitleb asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist põllumajandustoodete tootmisega tegelevatele väikestele ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtetele antava riigiabi suhtes ning millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 70/2001 (ELT L 358, 16.12.2006, lk 3).
However, these rules state that only the first participation of an undertaking in any particular fair or exhibition is eligible.
Ühenduse suunised riigiabi kohta põllumajandus- ja metsandussektoris aastateks 2007–2013 (ELT C 319, 27.12.2006, lk 1).
In their comments of 20 September 2013, Germany provided a table containing the number of businesses which were granted subsidies in the period 2003 – 2012 for repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition, together with the respective aid amounts (see paragraph 123).
Lk 37–39.
This table shows that the average funding amounts for repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition per subsidised company and year was between EUR 294 and EUR 5113 in the period 2007-2012.
Lk 38.
In its comments dated 13 January 2017, Germany also stated that the two undertakings Hochwald Foods GmbH and MUH Arla eG had received aid under this sub-measure (see paragraph 124).
Lk 43.
MUH Arla came into existence in 2012 as a result of the merger of Milch-Union Hocheifel (MUH) and the Scandinavian dairy conglomerate Arla Foods.
Lk 47.
In 2011, MUH employed around 800 staff and had a turnover of around EUR 693 million [77].
EÜT C 28, 1.2.2000, lk 2.
The Hochwald group employs more than 1900 staff and achieved a turnover of around EUR 1,44 billion in 2015 [78].
Lk 39–40.
Given these figures, neither MUH Arla eG nor Hochwald Foods GmbH fell within the definition of a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) set out in point 9 of Chapter II of the 2007-2013 Guidelines [79].
Lk 40–41.
In accordance with point 106 of the 2007-2013 guidelines, they should not, therefore, have received any aid (see paragraph 296).
27. veebruari 2015. aasta teade, lk 47.
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are thus fulfilled only for cases in which processing and marketing businesses falling under the definition of SMEs received under measure RP 2 aid for the first participation in a particular fair or exhibition.
2013. aasta septembri teade, lk 41–42.
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are not fulfilled for aid granted under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH (see paragraph 305).
Lk 43–47.
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are also not fulfilled for aid granted under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraph 301).
Lk 55.
The Commission concludes that aid under measure RP 2 met the relevant conditions of the 2007-2013 Guidelines and was therefore compatible with the internal market in the period from 2007 only in the cases referred to in paragraph 306.
Lk 56.
In the cases referred to in paragraphs 307 and 308, aid measure RP 2 did not meet the relevant conditions of the 2007-2013 Guidelines and was therefore not compatible with the internal market in the period from 2007.
Saksamaa asutused kinnitasid sellega seoses, et 2001. aastal (põhimenetluse jaoks määraval ajavahemikul) ei võetud abisaajate suhtes õiguslikult siduvaid kohustusi.
State aid for quality products in the period 2001-2006
Lk 58–59.
Measures to encourage the production and marketing of quality agricultural products implemented between 2001 and 2006 must meet the conditions specified under point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Lk 70–74.
Point 13.2 contains a non-exhaustive list of eligible activities in this area.
Lk 76.
Aid may be granted for consultancy and similar support, including technical studies, feasibility and design studies and market research, to be given for activities related to the development of quality agricultural products, including:
2013. aasta veebruari teade.
the introduction of quality assurance schemes such as the ISO 9000 or 14000 series, systems based on hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) or environmental audit systems,
Rheinland-Pfalzi reklaamimeetmete õiguslik alus on kindlaks määratud riigiabi N 381/2009 käsitlevas otsuses „Põllumajanduse turundusmeetmed Rheinland-Pfalzis“.
the costs of training personnel to apply quality assurance and HACCP systems.
27. veebruari 2015. aasta teade, lk 48.
Aid may also be granted to cover the cost of the charges levied by recognised certifying bodies for the initial certification of quality assurance and similar systems.
Lk 80.
Points 3, 4 and 5 of point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines provide for special conditions and limitations.
Lk 82.
The Commission takes the view that no aid should be granted in respect of routine in-process quality controls and routine product controls undertaken by the manufacturer, irrespective of whether they are undertaken on a voluntary basis or on a compulsory basis as a part of HACCP or similar systems.
Lk 83.
Aid should only be granted in respect of controls undertaken by or on behalf of third parties, such as the competent regulatory authorities, or bodies acting on their behalf, or independent organisms responsible for the control and supervision of the use of denominations of origin, organic labels, or quality labels.
Lk 84.
The total amount of aid that can be granted for SMEs under this section must not exceed 50 % of eligible costs or EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years, depending on which amount is higher (see point 13.2).
Lk 85.
Baden-Württemberg, Lower Saxony and Thuringia (sub-measures BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) granted financial support for improving the quality of the delivered milk through advice and training of dairy producers, the compilation and updating of databases and checks of dairy producers, parallel with the introduction of the ‘Quality Management QM Milk’ quality assurance systems (see paragraph 126).
ELT C 319, 27.12.2006, lk 1.
According to the German authorities, aid intensity amounted to a maximum of 100 % of eligible costs (see paragraph 129).
Komisjoni 12. jaanuari 2001. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 70/2001, mis käsitleb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist väikestele ja keskmise suurusega ettevõtetele antava riigiabi suhtes (EÜT L 10, 13.1.2001, lk 33).
In the Opening Decision, the Commission expressed doubts regarding the compatibility of the abovementioned sub-measures with the internal market in the relevant period [80].
Komisjoni 6. augusti 2008. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 800/2008 EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamise kohta, millega teatavat liiki abi tunnistatakse ühisturuga kokkusobivaks (üldine grupierandi määrus) (ELT L 214, 9.8.2008, lk 3), tunnistati 1. juulil 2014 kehtetuks komisjoni 17. juuni 2014. aasta määrusega (EL) nr 651/2014 ELi aluslepingu artiklite 107 ja 108 kohaldamise kohta, millega teatavat liiki abi tunnistatakse siseturuga kokkusobivaks (ELT L 187, 26.6.2014, lk 1).
The two sub-measures were carried out by the Milchprüfring Baden-Württemberg (BW 10) and the Milchwirtschaftlicher Verein Baden-Württemberg (BW 11) in favour of milk-producing agricultural enterprises which took part in the ‘QM-Milch’ quality assurance system (see paragraphs 131 and 132).
Algatamisotsuse punkt 244.
The execution of audits at dairy farms and the cost of initial certification by a recognised certification body (BW 10) as well as the costs of consultancy tasks in connection with the introduction of the quality assurance system (BW 11) were subsidised (see paragraphs 133 and 134).
Lk 77.
The subsidised costs thus correspond to the eligible costs laid down in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Määrus tunnistati 1. juulil 2014 kehtetuks komisjoni 25. juuni 2014. aasta määrusega (EL) nr 702/2014 Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklite 107 ja 108 kohaldamise kohta, millega teatavat liiki abi põllumajandus- ja metsandussektoris ja maapiirkondades tunnistatakse siseturuga kokkusobivaks (ELT L 193, 1.7.2014, lk 1).
Support was not provided for quality and product checks carried out routinely by the manufacturers during the production process, which are excluded in accordance with point 13.3.
Kvaliteedijuhtimissüsteemi QM-Milch puhul on tegemist piimatootjate ja meiereide vahel kogu riigis kehtiva piimatootmise standardiga, mida tunnustatakse kontrolliasutuste sertifitseerimise alusena.
According to the German authorities, the average expenditure was EUR 106 per beneficiary (see paragraph 135), well below the maximum allowable amount under point 13.2 of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years.
Algatamisotsuse punkt 66.
The conditions set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines are thus fulfilled in the case of sub-measures BW 10 and BW 11.
Algatamisotsuse punkt 253.
Lower Saxony granted the LVMN financial support for the implementation of a quality assurance system for milk producers (‘QM-Milch’).
Lk 11.
Point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines therefore applies.
20. septembri 2013. aasta märkused, lk 12.
The costs of preparatory measures for the implementation of the QM-Milch system (consulting services) as well as the costs for the coordination of the QM-Milch system and the creation of a database were subsidised (see paragraph 137).
20. septembri 2013. aasta märkused, lk 50.
Funding amounted to EUR 12,78 per case for consulting services and EUR 35 per farmer within 3 years for farm audits (see paragraph 138), which is well below the upper threshold specified in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Lk 50.
Germany has confirmed that the checks in the farm audits were carried out by or on behalf of third parties where the Landeskontrollverband Niedersachsen acts as an independent supervisory institution (see paragraph 139).
20. septembri 2013. aasta märkused, lk 83–84.
This meets the requirements laid down in point 13.3.
Punkt 3.3.
Point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines therefore applies.
Landesvereinigung väitis, et tegemist ei ole abiga.
According to the German authorities, the measure was introduced in 2004 (see paragraph 140).
Meetmete üksikasjalik kirjeldus on esitatud komisjoni 18. septembri 2015. aasta otsuses (EL) 2015/2432 riigiabi SA.35484 (2013/C) (ex SA.35484 (2012/NN)) kohta, mida Saksamaa andis piima kvaliteedi kontrolli jaoks piima- ja rasvaseaduse raames (ELT L 334, 22.12.2015, lk 23).
According to Germany, in the period 2004-2006, producers were only subsidised with respect to initial certification.
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 20. november 2003, Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie vs. GEMO, C-126/01, EU:C:2003:622, punkt 23.
The average aid granted to individual producers amounted to approximately EUR 83 (see paragraph 141).
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 20. november 2003, Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie vs. GEMO, C-126/01, EU:C:2003:622, EKL 2003, lk I-13769, punkt 24.
The subsidised costs correspond to the costs eligible under point 13.2 and the amount of aid is far below the ceiling set in the same point.
Nt Alam-Saksimaa puhul: 26. novembri 2004. aasta määrus maksu kehtestamise kohta piimasektoris (Alam-Saksimaa ametlik väljaanne Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt (Nds.
Measure TH 5 thus fulfils the requirements set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
GVBl.) nr 36/2004, lk 519), muudetud 22. detsembri 2005. aasta määruse artikliga 6 (Nds.
The Commission concludes that the aid assessed above (BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) did meet the relevant conditions of the 2000-2006 Guidelines and was therefore compatible with the internal market in the period 2001-2006.
GVBl. nr 31/2005, lk 475).