natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes that the 2000 decisions were not published or notified to BSCA.
Kokkuvõtteks võib märkida, et Altmarki kohtuotsuses toodud kriteeriumidest ei ole vähemalt esimene ja neljas kriteerium täidetud.
At any time before the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement was signed, the Region could have altered the investment programme, by adopting a new unilateral decision or even totally abandoning this programme, without such a decision infringing BSCA's rights.
Seetõttu ei saa komisjon Altmarki kohtuotsuse sätteid kohaldades välistada, et toetuse näol, mida piirkond maksab lennujaama tegevusega seotud teenuste eest, on tegemist eelisega.
Furthermore, as indicated in the 2012 extension decision, this investment programme contained uncertainties about the financing mechanism and amounts.
Turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja kriteeriumi kohaldamine
The latter could have been altered in line with changing needs.
Selleks et määrata kindlaks meetmeid võtnud üksus, leiab komisjon, et selliste üksuste, nagu i) Vallooni piirkond, kes on lennujaamapiirkonda hõlmava kinnisvara omanik, ja ii) SOWAER, kelle näol on tegemist Vallooni piirkonna ainukontrolli all oleva äriühinguga, kes on lennujaamapiirkonna halduskontsessiooni andja, lennujaama territooriumile rajatud taristu omanik ja piirkonna delegeeritud ülesannete täitja, tegevust tuleb analüüsida koos, sest need hõlmavad sama tegevusvaldkonda ja sama lennujaama.
Accordingly, the new North terminal needed to be modular and its construction ‘had to be gradual and tailored to the development of the airport's actual activities and resulting operational needs’.
Sellistel asjaoludel tuleb SOWAERi nende ülesannete puhul käsitada piirkonna vahendajana.
In addition, the financing mechanism envisaged at the time — i.e. involving the Société Régionale Wallonne du Transport — was ultimately abandoned in favour of financing through SOWAER, a new instrument that received its financial resources only when it was created on 1 July 2001 and in the amount of EUR 75000000 only.
Selleks et määrata kindlaks, kas punktis 3.1 nimetatud meetmetega anti BSCA-le majanduseelis või mitte, vaatleb komisjon meetmed võtnud üksusena rühma, mis hõlmab piirkonda ja SOWAERi (edaspidi „piirkond-SOWAER“).
On the other hand, given that the investment programme was included in the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement, SOWAER was under an obligation towards BSCA: it had to place the land and infrastructure at BSCA's disposal, including the infrastructure to be constructed in accordance with the investment programme, and to provide certain services, in return for a concession fee, otherwise it would fail to comply with its contractual obligations.
Seega leiab komisjon, et ta peab hindama koos piirkonna-SOWAERi võetud kohustusi, kui nendega muudetakse kontsessiooni majanduslikke tingimusi (taristu, sealhulgas investeerimiskavaga hõlmatava taristu BSCA käsutusse andmine, suurte remonditöödega seotud kulutuste kandmine, kontsessioonitasu, toetus teatavate lennujaama tegevusega seotud teenuste osutamise eest, samas kui need teenused on majanduslikku laadi) ja kui nad on ligikaudu samaaegsed ja omavahel seotud.
The Commission also takes the view that SOWAER's commitment to implement an investment programme and to provide certain services must be examined together with BSCA's commitment to pay a concession fee.
Komisjon kohaldab seega turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja kriteeriumi järjestikku järgmise nelja meetmete rühma suhtes:
It is impossible to determine whether the Region's plans to place the infrastructure at BSCA's disposal, including new infrastructure constructed in accordance with the investment programme, and to provide certain services constitute aid until the amount of the fee to be paid by BSCA in return is known.
SOWAERi ja BSCA 2002. aasta leping ning piirkonna ja BSCA lepingu 29. märtsi 2002. aasta lisaleping (edaspidi „2002. aasta lepingud“);
The Commission concludes that the measure consisting in placing the infrastructure at BSCA's disposal, including new infrastructure which SOWAER undertook to construct, and in providing certain services in return for a fee was granted by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement.
Vallooni piirkonna valitsuse 3. aprilli 2003. aasta otsus ehitada esialgsest suurema teenindusvõimsusega terminal (3 miljonit reisijat 2 miljoni asemel) ja näha ette suurem autoparkla (edaspidi „2003. aasta investeerimisotsus“);
It therefore postdates the ADP judgment.
SOWAERi ja BSCA 4. aprilli 2006. aasta teenindamisleping ning SOWAERi ja BSCA lepingu 10. märtsi 2006. aasta muudatus (edaspidi „2006. aasta lepingud“);
Moreover, it should be recalled that the investment programme included in the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement was significantly amended by the decision of the Walloon Government of 3 April 2003.
piirkonna ja BSCA lepingu 15. jaanuari 2008. aasta muudatus (edaspidi „2008. aasta muudatus“).
The Commission takes the view that this revision of the investment programme constitutes a substantial change and therefore a new measure potentially constituting new State aid granted to BSCA, in addition to the potential aid already granted through the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement.
Kõikide nende meetmete puhul, kui komisjon tuvastab eelise olemasolu, vaatleb ta, kas see eelis on valikuline.
Given that it stems from a decision of 3 April 2003, this measure constitutes a new measure, adopted after the ADP judgment and therefore subject to the applicable rules on State aid.
Turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja kriteeriumi kohaldamine meetmete suhtes, mis on seotud taristu BSCA käsutusse andmisega, seejuures uute investeeringutega ja suurte remonditöödega ning toetuse maksmisega lennujaama tegevusega seotud teatud teenuste eest
Investments and services provided by SOWAER that must be excluded from the analysis due to being non-economic in nature
2002. aasta lepingud
As highlighted by points 34 and 35 of the aviation guidelines, not all the activities of an airport operator are necessarily economic in nature.
Nelja meetme suhtes kohaldatavad üldised põhimõtted
The Court of Justice has therefore confirmed that activities that normally fall under State responsibility in the exercise of its official powers as a public authority are not economic in nature [132].
Nagu on öeldud lennundussuuniste punktis 51, peab turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja kriteeriumile vastavuse analüüs tuginema rahuldavatele eelnevatele kasumlikkuse väljavaadetele rahastava üksuse seisukohast [153].
Such activities include, in particular, security, air traffic control, police and customs [133].
Komisjon märgib, et piirkond ei ole esitanud ühtegi äriplaani, milles oleks välja toodud piirkonna ja/või SOWAERi eeldatav kasumlikkus seoses sel ajal kavandatud investeeringutega, millest kõikide tegemiseks oli vastu võetud siduvaid otsuseid.
The Commission takes the view that investments and major repairs involving assets associated with air navigation (relating to the control tower, for example), aircraft firefighting, security (defined as combating acts of unlawful interference), police and customs may be non-economic in nature.
Äriplaani puudumine näitab, et piirkond ja/või SOWAER ei tegutsenud turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja loogika kohaselt, kui nad võtsid BSCA kasuks meetmed.
Given that, in the present case, air navigation, aircraft firefighting, security, police and customs services are not organised according to a market logic, the Commission considers that the investments and major repairs involving assets associated with these services are not economic in nature.
Komisjon märgib samuti, et Vallooni piirkonna valitsuse otsuse toetuseks esitatud aruanded põhjendasid soovi kõnealused investeeringud teha lennujaama arengu positiivse mõjuga Charleroi linna ja piirkonna majandusele ja tööhõivele [154].
In particular, the fencing of the part of the airport site that is accessed through police checkpoints and the part of the site where the aircraft are located may be regarded as a non-economic activity insofar as it concerns security.
Komisjon meenutab samas, et järjepideva kohtupraktika kohaselt ei saa piirkonna arenguga seotud järeldusi võtta arvesse turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja kriteeriumi kohaldamisel [155].
The Commission also considers as non-economic those costs associated with investments in and maintenance of buildings and equipment used for both economic activities and non-economic activities, in a proportion corresponding to their use for a non-economic activity.
Vaatamata piirkonna ja/või SOWAERi äriplaani puudumisele vaatles komisjon seda, kas rühma piirkond-SOWAER puhul on iga põhjenduses 416 kindlaks määratud meetmerühma nüüdispuhasväärtus positiivne.
In particular, 7 % of the cost of investments made in the new terminal may be regarded as non-economic in nature, because 7 % of the terminal surface area is occupied by police and customs services, passenger and baggage search officials, and officials from the Walloon Public Service responsible for site safety.
Kui teatud meetme nüüdispuhasväärtus on positiivne, tähendab see, et kõnealune meede on asjaomase ettevõtja jaoks kasutoov.
However, the Commission regards as economic those investments and major repairs involving the Category III ILS [134] and runway lighting.
Nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutamisel kasutati üksuse piirkond-SOWAER puhul rahavoogude ajakohastatud kogusummat (tulud miinus kulud) seoses iga meetmerühmaga ajal, kui meede võeti.
These costs are not associated with a public policy remit, but are inherent in the commercial operation of the infrastructure, which involves placing this infrastructure at the disposal of airlines under satisfactory safety conditions.
Nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutamiseks kasutatav diskontomäär määrati kindlaks, hinnates meetme võtnud üksuse kapitalikulu ajal, kui meede võeti.
In particular, ensuring ground traffic safety (including during landings and take-offs) forms an integral part of the airport's commercial operation and is therefore economic in nature.
Üksuse kapitalikulu sõltub selle üksuse rahastamise struktuurist, eelkõige omavahenditest ja võlgadest.
In the recent Commission decision on Marseille airport [135], operational safety was also excluded from the scope of ‘non-economic activities’.
Käesoleval juhul moodustasid suurema osa rühma piirkond-SOWAER vaadeldava projektiga seotud kuludest SOWAERi rahastatud investeeringud.
The Commission also takes the view that investments in fire detection in passenger car parks are economic in nature.
Seetõttu otsustas komisjon hinnata meetme võtnud üksuse kapitalikulu suurust SOWAERI bilansiandmete alusel, kuna SOWAERi näol on tegemist üksuse piirkond-SOWAER rahastamisstruktuuriga, ning samaaegselt ka kapitaliturgudele juurdepääsu tingimuste alusel.
These costs are not associated with a public policy remit, but are inherent in the commercial operation of the passenger car park.
Turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva eraettevõtja kriteeriumi kohaldamine 2002. aasta lepingute suhtes
Moreover, as highlighted by point 36 of the aviation guidelines, the Commission must check that the funding of non-economic activities is strictly limited to compensating the costs to which they give rise and may not be used for economic activities [136].
Kohaldades 2002. aasta lepinguid, otsustas SOWAER anda BSCA käsutusse Charleroi lennujaama territooriumi ja taristu, saades selle eest vastu kontsessioonitasu, ning kohustus kõnealust taristut arendama SOWAERi ja BSCA 2002. aasta lepingule lisatud investeerimiskava alusel, teostama suured hooldus- ja remonditööd ning maksma BSCA-le toetust teatavate lennujaama tegevusega seotud teenuste osutamise eest.
Otherwise their funding cannot escape the State aid rules.
Vastupidine stsenaarium hõlmab olukorda, kus piirkond-SOWAER ei sõlmi 2002. aasta lepinguid ning ei kohustu seega tegema suuri investeeringuid ega maksma „tuletõrje ja hooldusega“ seotud toetust.
SOWAER is directly responsible for the investments and major repairs.
Komisjon eeldas, et sellise vastupidise, abi andmist mittehõlmava stsenaariumi korral oleks lennujaam tõenäoliselt jätkanud tegutsemist, kuid palju väiksemas mahus, võttes arvesse vajadust 2002. aasta lepingus sätestatud investeeringute järele, mis võimaldasid lennujaama reisijate arvu märkimisväärselt suurendada.
These costs are not therefore financed through aid paid to BSCA, which the latter could use for economic activities.
Sellise stsenaariumi korral oleks nüüdispuhasväärtus olnud vaid veidi positiivne ning seda ei oleks olnud võimalik mingil usaldusväärsuse tasemel hinnata, eeskätt seetõttu, et on väga keeruline prognoosida, milline oleks ilma 2002. aasta lepinguteta olnud eeldatav reisijate arv ja BSCA poolt piirkonnale-SOWAERile makstava kontsessioonitasu suurus.
Lastly, as highlighted by point 37 of the aviation guidelines, the Commission must check that the funding of non-economic activities does not lead to undue discrimination between airports.
Nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutamisel eeldas komisjon seega, et vastupidise stsenaariumi nüüdispuhasväärtus võrdub nulliga.
As clarified by Belgium, SOWAER carries out the investments and major repairs without discriminating between the airports for which it is responsible, namely the airports in the Walloon region.
Kui seda eeldust arvestades on 2002. aasta lepingute nüüdispuhasväärtus negatiivne, on see negatiivne ka eeldusel, et vastupidise stsenaariumi nüüdispuhasväärtus on positiivne.
As highlighted by recital 26 of this decision, the Belgian regions have been given the necessary powers to equip and operate public airports situated within their territory, except for Brussels National Airport.
Seega on tegemist piirkonnale-SOWAERile ja BSCA-le soodsa stsenaariumiga.
Given this legal framework, the Commission takes the view that the relevant level for assessing the existence of discrimination in terms of the financing of the investments and services provided by SOWAER is the region, and not the Federal State.
2002. aasta meetme nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutamisel arvessevõetavad tulud ja kulud
As SOWAER carries out the investments and major repairs without discriminating between the two main Walloon airports (Liège and Charleroi), the Commission concludes that there is no undue discrimination between the airports.
Selleks et arvutada 2002. aasta lepingute nüüdispuhasväärtust piirkonna-SOWAERi jaoks, määras komisjon kindlaks piirkonna-SOWAERi kulud ja tulud, mis neist lepingutest tulenevad, hõlmates järgmisi kulusid ja tulusid:
The financing of the non-economic activities described in recital 365 cannot therefore be qualified as State aid and is consequently excluded from the subsequent analysis.
ajavahemikul 2002–2015:
Subsidy paid by the Region for certain services associated with the airport activities
prognoositav SOWAERi investeeringukulu (vt tabel 13) ja kulu, mis on seotud majanduslikku laadi teenuste osutamisega, ning osa piirkonna makstavast toetusest lennujaama tegevusega seotud teatud majanduslikku laadi teenuste osutamise eest;
As indicated in Section 5.1.1.1(c)(i), Belgium considers that the tasks for which the Region pays a subsidy fall within the public policy remit and do not therefore constitute an economic activity.
prognoositav tulu, mis tuleneb BSCA poolt SOWAERile makstavast kontsessioonitasust;
In order to determine whether the subsidy relates to non-economic activities and cannot therefore be qualified as State aid, the same examination as described in Section 6.1.1.1(b) must be made.
ajavahemikul 2016–2040:
Fire protection and security
Need andmed põhinevad prognoosidel, mis olid kättesaadavad piirkonnale ja SOWAERile 2002. aastal ja mis hõlmasid eeskätt reisijate arvu ja kulusid.
As indicated in recital 365, the Commission takes the view that, in the present case, the activities associated with aircraft fire protection and security [137] do not constitute economic activities.
Komisjon ei võtnud seega arvesse investeerimiskava tuletisväärtusi, mida ei saanud kasutada kava rakendamisel 2002. aasta aprillis (näiteks ehitushindade tõusu ja pinnase stabiilsuse probleemidega seotud kulude tuletisväärtusi, mis ei olnud investeerimiskava koostamise hetkel teada).
Application of point 36 of the aviation guidelines
Komisjon ei võtnud nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutamisel arvesse ka territooriumi ja taristu väärtust, seda nii selle stsenaariumi puhul, mis hõlmas 2002. aasta lepingute sõlmimist kui ka vastupidise stsenaariumi puhul.
As highlighted by point 36 of the aviation guidelines, even where an activity is regarded as non-economic, the Commission must check that the funding of non-economic activities is strictly limited to compensating the costs to which they give rise and may not be used for economic activities [138].
Nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutus põhines 2002. aastal prognoositud rahavoogudel.
Fire protection
Ja lõpuks ei võtnud komisjon arvesse ka võimalikku lisandväärtust, mis oli seotud kapitali ja SOWAERi BSCAs omatava osaluse eest saadavate dividendidega.
As regards fire protection, the Commission indicates that, under Article 25 of the schedule of conditions annexed to the 1991 Region/BSCA agreement, in order for the Region to fund the fire and maintenance services, BSCA must keep a separate operating account that may at any time be analysed and checked by the concession authority.
Euroopa Kohus on sedastanud, [157] et „hindamaks, kas riigi võetud meede on riigiabi, tuleb kindlaks teha, kas ettevõtja, kelle suhtes meede võeti, saab mingi majandusliku eelise, mida ta tavalistes turutingimustes ei saaks.
Moreover, under Article 3.2.3 of the Region/BSCA agreement, as amended by Amendment No 3 of 29 March 2002, the costs inherent in the fire and maintenance services are reimbursed in 12 instalments.
Seejuures on siseriikliku õigusasutuse ülesanne määrata kindlaks asjakohane tasu kõnealuste teenuste osutamise eest“.
The twelfth instalment is paid after the Minister receives and approves a report, based on BSCA's annual accounts, providing justification for the costs incurred and presented in the same format as required for the provisional budget, i.e. based on the headings defined by Article 25 of the schedule of conditions.
Komisjon leiab, et vaadeldaval juhul võimaldatakse taristu BSCA käsutusse andmisega turuhinnast madalama hinnaga BSCA-le eelis, seda isegi eeldusel, et SOWAER loodab oma kahjumi tagasi teenida tema omanduses oleva kapitali väärtuse suurenemise või dividendide abil.
Lastly, for the period after 10 March 2006, Article 25.7 of the schedule of conditions, introduced by Amendment No 5 of 10 March 2006, provides that the amount of the compensation for the fire protection and ground traffic and airport site safety services may not exceed the actual costs incurred by BSCA and that any overcompensation of the costs will result in budgetary compensation through the budget entry for the following year.
Komisjon toob samuti esile asjaolu, et lähenemine, mille puhul võetakse arvesse kapitali ja dividendidega seotud eeldatavat väärtuse kasvu, mõjutab konkurentsiolukorda.
The Commission takes the view that these provisions are sufficient to conclude that, since Amendment No 3 of 2002 to the Region/BSCA agreement, the compensation paid by the Region for the fire protection costs has been proportionate and has not been used to subsidise economic activities.
Äärmuslikul juhul võib selline stsenaarium tähendada, et ollakse nõus olukorraga, kus riiklik ametiasutus nõuab lennujaamalt, mille aktsionär ta ise on, nullväärtusega kontsessioonitasu (kui see ametiasutus võib eeldada dividendide saamist ja/või kapitali väärtuse suurenemist), ilma et selle näol oleks tegemist abiga.
Security was added to the activities for which BSCA receives compensation through Amendment No 6 of 15 January 2008.
See võimaldaks kõnealusel lennujaamal pakkuda lennuettevõtjatele väga madalaid hindu ning tekitaks konkurentsimoonutuse eeskätt eraõiguslike lennujaamadega võrreldes.
The security tasks are defined as ‘the combination of measures and human and natural resources intended to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference’ [139].
Järgmises tabelis on toodud majandustegevusega seotud investeeringute kulud, mida komisjon võttis arvesse 2002. aasta meetme nüüdispuhasväärtuse arvutamisel.
The security services include ‘screening, remote surveillance, security rounds and patrols, access control and issue of visitor badges’ [140].
Selleks et määrata kindlaks investeeringud, mis olid 15. aprilli 2002. aasta seisuga veel teostamata, kandis komisjon 2002. aastasse üle 2001. ja 2002. aastaks kavandatud investeeringud [158] ja lahutas sellest summast investeeringud, mis olid 15. aprilliks 2002 juba tehtud [159].
Article 25.7 of the schedule of conditions, as amended by Amendment No 6 of 15 January 2008, provides that ‘the amount of the compensation intended to cover the costs incurred in providing the services may not exceed the actual costs incurred by the concession-holder in this context, after deducting any fees collected from users to cover these services.
Tabel 13
Any overcompensation of these costs will result in budgetary compensation through the budget entry for the following year’.
15. aprilli 2002. aasta seisuga veel teostamata investeeringute maksumus
The Commission takes the view that these provisions are sufficient to conclude that the compensation paid for the security costs has been proportionate and has not been used to subsidise economic activities.
(miljonites eurodes)
Application of point 37 of the aviation guidelines
2002 + 2003 + 2004
As highlighted by point 37 of the aviation guidelines, the Commission must check that the funding of non-economic activities does not lead to undue discrimination between airports.
Sundvõõrandamine (1 etapi saldo)
As clarified by Belgium, the non-economic activities of the two main Walloon airports (Liège and Charleroi) are funded in a non-discriminatory manner by the Region.
Uute maade omandamine
Given this legal framework, the Commission takes the view that the relevant level for assessing the existence of discrimination in terms of the financing of certain non-economic services associated with the airport activities is the region, and not the Federal State.
Uute maade saldo
As the non-economic activities of the two main Walloon airports (Liège and Charleroi) are funded in a non-discriminatory manner by the Region, the Commission concludes that there is no undue discrimination between the airports.
Ettevõtte SABCA rekonstrueerimine
The compensation paid for BSCA's activities associated with fire protection and security cannot therefore be qualified as State aid and is consequently excluded from the subsequent analysis.
Mahaarvamised, korrigeerimised ja muud artiklid
Maintenance/ground traffic safety
Vahesumma
In this section, the Commission examines whether the following services may escape the applicable State aid rules due to their non-economic nature:
Tehniliste ja haldusruumide remont
the ‘maintenance services’, as defined by Articles 12 and 19 of the schedule of conditions annexed to the Region/BSCA agreement;
Lennujaama territooriumi piiramine
the ‘ground traffic safety services’, as defined by Article 25 of the schedule of conditions amended by Amendment No 5 of 10 March 2006.
Lähenemis- ja ruleerimisvalgustus
As indicated in recital 71, the maintenance service is defined by Articles 12 and 19 of the schedule of conditions as ‘technical maintenance services for buildings, runways, surrounding areas, vehicle fleet, etc.’ [141], and as ‘maintenance of land, buildings and building facilities, and equipment forming part of the concession or placed at the disposal of the concession, such that they are always fit for their intended purpose’ [142].
Veeärajuhtimissüsteemi väljaehitus
As indicated in recitals 73 and 74, Amendment No 5 of 10 March 2006 amended Article 3.2.2 of the Region/BSCA agreement and Article 25 of the schedule of conditions.
Kütusejaama laiendus
As a result of these amendments, the Region pays compensation to BSCA for the costs of the fire protection and ground traffic and airport site safety services.
Jäätmete kõrvaldamine