natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus, measurements of wet weight and SVL cannot appropriately be used in statistical analyses for differences in growth rates.
3,630 mg.
Therefore, wet weight and length data from organisms > NF60 should be censored and cannot be used in analyses of replicate means or replicate medians.
Wi = 1/Var(ri).
OECD (2004) Report of the Validation of the Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay for the detection of thyroid active substances:
Kooijman, S. A. L. M., Hanstveit, A. O., ja Nyholm, N. (1996).
ASTM (2002) Standard Guide for Conducting Acute Toxicity Tests on Test Materials with Fishes, Macroinvertebrates, and Amphibians.
RNS = RN / SS
American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM E729-96(2002), Philadelpia, PA
RTS = RT / SS
ASTM (2004) Standard Guide for Conducting the Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay — Xenopus (FETAX).
IT = [1 – (RT – RTA) / RTB] × 100 %
Kahl,M.D., Russom,C.L., DeFoe,D.L. & Hammermeister,D.E. (1999) Saturation units for use in aquatic bioassays.
IH = [1 – (RH – RHA) / RHB] × 100 %
Chemosphere 39, pp. 539-551
IN = [1 – (RT – RH) / (RTB – RHB)] × 100 %
Nieuwkoop,P.D. & Faber,J.
Chemosphere 10:
Normal Table of Xenopus laevis.
245–261.
Garland Publishing, New York
27–39.
OECD (2007) Guidance Document on Amphibian Thyroid Histology.
471–483.
Dodd,M.H.I. & Dodd,J.M.
Testing the toxicity of chemicals by the inhibition of respiration of activated sludge.
Physiology of Amphibia.
Toxic.
Lofts,B.
Assess.
OECD (2006) Current Approaches in the Statistical Analysis of Ecotoxicity Data:
1: 515–524.
Environmental Health and Safety Publications.
Wasser/Abwasser 117: 80.
Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 54.
Bull.
Paris
13:
ISO (1999) Soil Quality — Effects of soil pollutants on Collembola (Folsomia candida):
J. Phys.
International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve
Chem.
111-118
Ecotox.
In New trends in soil Biology (Lebrun Ph, André HM, De Medts A, Grégoire-Wibo, Wauthy G (Eds), Proceedings of the VI. international colloquium on soil zoology, Louvain-la-neuve (Belgium), 30 August-2 September 1982, I Dieu-Brichart, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, pp. 261-268
Int.
Goto HE (1960) Simple techniques for the rearing of Collembola and a not on the use of a fungistatic substance in the cultures.
B 11: 1–14.
However, if the test chemical is demonstrated not to adsorb to filters, filtration may also be acceptable.
Audus, L. J. (toim.), The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides.
volume of overlying and pore water; weight of wet sediment with and without pore water for the test vessels and the crystallising dishes;
J. Agro.
ASTM International (2009), E1706-05E01:
349–369.
Zool., 48:
Toxicol.
345-350.
Chem.
Kawai, K. (1986), Fundamental studies on chironomid allergy, I. Culture methods of some Japanese chironomids (Chironomidae, Diptera), Jp.
11: 1485–1492.
Zool., 37:
Käesoleva lisa peatükk C.33 „Vihmausside (Eisenia fetida / Eisenia andrei) sigivuse katse”.
47-57.
Lõppvalmistis – asjaomast toimeainet sisaldav turustatav valmistoode.
OECD (2000), Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures, Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 23, ENV/JM/MONO(2000)6, OECD, Paris.
V = P (14)
Weltje, L., Rufli, H., Heimbach, F., Wheeler, J., Vervliet-Scheebaum, M. and M. Hamer (2010), The chironomid acute toxicity test:
3 (50 %) (19);
Chem., 13:
V > P (Ю)
1163-1175.
7 (75 %),
Naylor, C. and C. Rodrigues (1995), Development of a test method for Chironomus riparius using a formulated sediment, Chemosphere, 31:
V > P (3)
482-491.
Polygonum pensylvanicum
577-585.
Use of a model and toxicity data to predict the risks to some wild plant species from drift of four herbicides.
To prepare the combined stock solution (II): mix the following amounts (ml) of stock solutions (I) and make up to 1 litre of deionised water
Toxicol.
MOA
Pollut.
Tyler, C.R., R.van Aerle, T.H.
98: 555–558.
Parks, L.G., A.O. Cheek, N.D. Denslow, S.A. Heppell, J.A. McLachlan, G.A.
Weed Res.
Hahlbeck, E., I. Katsiadaki, I. Mayer, M. Adolfsson-Erici, J. James, and B.E.
Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity.
OECD (2010), Guidance Document on the Diagnosis of Endocrine-related Histopathology in Fish Gonads, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 123, ENV/JM/MONO(2010)14, OECD, Paris.
Marrs, R. H., Williams, C. T., Frost, A. J., ja Plant, R. A. (1989).
Holbech, H., K. Kinnberg, G.I.
Marrs, R. H., Frost, A. J., ja Plant, R. A. (1991).
Panter, G.H., T.H. Hutchinson, K.S. Hurd, A. Sherren, R.D. Stanley, and C.R.
Environ.
OECD (2000), Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 23, OECD, Paris.
Effects of mecoprop drift on some plant species of conservation interest when grown in standardized mixtures in microcosms.
OECD (2011), Validation Report ( Phase 2) for the Fish Sexual Development Test, Series on Testing and Assessment No 142, ENV/JM/MONO(2011)23, OECD, Paris.
Determination of buffer zones to protect seedlings of non-target plants from the effects of glyphosate spray drift.
Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.
Ecosyst.
27 ± 2 °C
J. Environ.
20 ± 2 °C
Manage.
385-398.
(Herbiseed) (2004).
5 min 95 °C
(National Wildlife Research Centre, Environment Canada) (2004).
Saturate the test medium with air at the test temperature by aerating with clean compressed air for about 20 minutes.
1 päev enne katset
Determination of the biodegradability of the organic fraction of chemical wastes.
Pedobiologia 23: 217–232.
Screening Test Methods for Assessment of Biodegradability of Chemical Substances in Seawater.
Pedobiologia 37: 2–29.
mg DOC/l
Trimmed Spearman-Karber Method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays.
% abiotic degradation
11: 714–719;
ThODNH3
12 (1978): 417.
mgsubstance
J. Am.
ThODNO2
Stat.
ThODNO3
Assoc.
(of total data) (%)
The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research.
12 relative atomic mass of carbon; n
Ecotox.
where: p
Environ.
pressure of the gas (Pascals); V
38: 108–121.
volume of the gas (m3); R
Phillips, C. T., Checkai, R. T., ja Kuperman, R. G. (1998).
Sib
Vähemalt 4 paralleel-proovi kontsentratsiooni kohta?
C.9, Biodegradation — Zahn-Wellens Test;
Phys.
Shelton D.R. and Tiedje, J.M. (1984) General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential.
Milligrammides muda grammi kohta
Owen, W.F., Stuckey, DC., Healy J.B., Jr, Young L.Y. and McCarty, P.L.
Hoiatus – käärivas mudas tekivad tule- ja plahvatusohtlikud gaasid ning samuti võib see sisaldada patogeenseid organisme, mistõttu tuleb muda käsitsemisel võtta asjakohased ettevaatusabinõud.
Healy, J.B.Jr. and Young, L.Y.
I on pärssumise protsentuaalne määr,
Proposed standard practice for the determination of the anaerobic biodegradation of organic chemicals.
Käesoleva lisa peatükk C.43 „Orgaaniliste ainete anaeroobne biolagunevus läbikäärinud mudas:
Battersby, N.S. and Wilson, V. (1988) Evaluation of a serum bottle technique for assessing the anaerobic biodegradability of organic chemicals under methanogenic conditions.
BL 6958/A.
E1192-92.
Control 70: 58–70.
International Organization for Standardization (2003) ISO 13 641-1 Water Quality — Determination of inhibition of gas production of anaerobic bacteria — Part 1 General Test.
Microb.
Test temperature:
Chemosphere 39: 2007–2018.
Russel, M.H. (1995).
35–46.
In progress in Pesticide Biochemistry and Toxicology, Vol.
ASTM STP 707.
Agriculture Canada (1987).
Uptake and depuration of non-ionic organic contaminants from sediment by the oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus.
Environmental Chemistry and Fate Guidelines for registration of pesticides in Canada.
Environ.
Annex I to Commission Directive 95/36/EC of 14 July 1995 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 172, 22.7.1995, p.
Toxicol.
Dutch Commission for Registration of Pesticides (1991).
Mudroch, A., Azcue, J. M., ja Mudroch, P. (toim.), Manual of bioassessment of aquatic sediment quality.
Final Report of the OECD Workshop on Selection of Soils/Sediments.
Morphallaxis in an aquatic oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus:
Chapter C.7, degradation — abiotic degradation: hydrolysis as a function of pH
Dev.
Soil Texture Classification (US and FAO systems).
94–103.
Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde.
Kaster, J. L., Klump, J. V., Meyer, J., Krezoski, J., ja Smith, M. E. (1984).
7, 177-217.
(1998) (2), USA Materjalide Katsetamise Ühing (2000) (3) ja USA Keskkonnakaitseamet (2000) (4).
Plenum Press, New York.
Vesistötoksikologian laboratorio
Holland, P.T. (1996).
Yliopistokatu 7, PL 111
68, 1167-1193.
C.N.R.– I.R.S.A.
In Unser Boden — 70 Jahre Agrarforschung der BASF AG, 225-236.
Iga kontroll- ja katsenõu puhul soovitatakse lisada 10 täiskasvanud emaslooma kunstlikusse mulda kuivmassiga 20 g.
Problematik und Relevanz von Pflanzenschutzmittel-Spuren im Grund (Trink-) Wasser.
57: 21–46.
Weeds 15, 214-216.
Väljaandes:
Helling, C.S. (1971).
Dahl, F. (toim.), Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 59.
Pesticide mobility in soils.
Teil.
Soil Sci.
Do females eat males?
Soc.
Academia Prague & SPD Academic Publishing bv, Haag.
35, 743-748.
Symp.
McCall, P.J., Laskowski, D.A., Swann, R.L. and Dishburger, H.J. (1981).
1994, Columbus, Ohio, lk 621–628.
Measurements of sorption coefficients of organic chemicals and their use in environmental fate analysis.
Krogh, P. H., ja Axelsen, J. A. (1998).
In Test Protocols for Environmental Fate and Movement of Toxicants.
Løkke, H., ja van Gestel, C. A. M., Handbook of soil invertebrate toxicity tests.
Proceedings of AOAC Symposium, AOAC, Washington D.C.
Løkke, H., Janssen, C. R., Lanno, R. P., Römbke, J., Rundgren, S., ja Van Straalen, N. M. (2002).
Hollis, J.M.
Fairbrother, A., Glazebrook, P. W., Van Straalen, N. M., ja Tarazona, J. V. (toim.).
European Standard, EN 84 — 1997.
Biologie der Bodenraubmilbe Hypoaspis aculeifer Canestrini, 1883 (Gamasina) unter Laborbedingungen.
European Standard, EN 113/A1 — 2004.
Zool.
European Standard, EN 252 — 1989.
Beitr.
American Society for Testing and Materials Standards, ASTM D 1193-77 Type II — 1983.
Sci.
The test consists of two phases; the uptake (exposure) phase and the elimination (post-exposure) phase.
Fairbrother, A., Glazebrock, P. W., Van Straalen, N. M., ja Tarazona, J. V. (2002).
OECD (1996).
Kevan, D. K. McE., ja Sharma, G. D. (1964).
De Boer, J., Smedes, F., Wells, D. & Allan, A. (1999).
Veise seerumialbumiini (BSA)
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/276
Nõukogu rakendusmäärus (EL) 2016/276,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus [1], and in particular Article 8a(1) thereof,
võttes arvesse nõukogu 18. mai 2006. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 765/2006, milles käsitletakse piiravaid meetmeid Valgevene suhtes, [1] eriti selle artikli 8a lõiget 1,
On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.
Nõukogu võttis 18. mail 2006. aastal vastu määruse (EÜ) nr 765/2006.
On 25 February 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/280 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus [2], extending the application of the restrictive measures until 28 February 2017 and amending Annex I and deleting Annex II to that Decision.
Nõukogu võttis 25. veebruaril 2016 vastu otsuse (ÜVJP) 2016/280, millega muudetakse otsust 2012/642/ÜVJP, mis käsitleb Valgevene vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid, [2] pikendades Valgevene vastu suunatud piiravate meetmete kehtivust 28. veebruarini 2017, muutes kõnealuse otsuse I lisa ja jättes välja kõnealuse otsuse II lisa.
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Määruse (EÜ) nr 765/2006 I lisa asendatakse käesoleva määruse lisas esitatud tekstiga.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/280 of 25 February 2016 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (see page 30 of this Official Journal).
Nõukogu 25. veebruari 2016. aasta otsus (ÜVJP) 2016/280, millega muudetakse otsust 2012/642/ÜVJP, mis käsitleb Valgevene vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid (vt käesoleva Euroopa Liidu Teataja lk 30).
Persons referred to in Article 2(1)
Artikli 2 lõikes 1 osutatud isikud
Former Secretary of the Security Council.
Endine turismi- ja spordiminister, endine siseminister ja endine presidendi administratsiooni asejuhataja.”
Council Regulation (EU) 2016/277
Nõukogu määrus (EL) 2016/277,
amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus
millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 765/2006, milles käsitletakse piiravaid meetmeid Valgevene suhtes
Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus [1],
võttes arvesse nõukogu 15. oktoobri 2012. aasta otsust 2012/642/ÜVJP, mis käsitleb Valgevene vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid [1],
Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 [2] provides for a freezing of the assets of President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus, as well as of assets of persons responsible for serious violations of human rights or the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and of persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the Lukashenko regime, including, in particular, persons and entities providing financial or material support to that regime.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 765/2006 [2] näeb ette järgmiste isikute ja üksuste varade külmutamise: president Lukašenko ja teatavad Valgevene ametnikud, samuti inimõiguste raske rikkumise või kodanikuühiskonna ja demokraatliku opositsiooni represseerimise eest vastutavad isikud, ning isikud ja üksused, kes saavad kasu Lukašenko režiimist või toetavad seda, eelkõige need, kes toetavad kõnealust režiimi rahaliselt või materiaalselt.
The application of the asset freeze should be maintained in respect of four persons listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.
Varade külmutamist tuleks jätkata määruse (EÜ) nr 765/2006 I lisas loetletud nelja isiku suhtes.
All persons and entities listed in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 in respect of which the application of the asset freeze was suspended should be deleted, and the suspension of the application of the prohibition should be brought to an end.
Kõik määruse (EÜ) nr 765/2006 IV lisas loetletud isikud ja üksused, kelle suhtes varade külmutamine oli peatatud, tuleks määrusest välja jätta ning varade külmutamise peatamine tuleks lõpetada.
This measure falls within the scope of the Treaty and regulatory action at the level of the Union is therefore necessary in order to give effect to it, in particular with a view to ensuring its uniform application by economic operators in all Member States.
Käesolev meede kuulub aluslepingu kohaldamisalasse ja seepärast on selle rakendamiseks vaja liidu tasandi õigusakti, eelkõige tagamaks, et kõikide liikmesriikide majandustegevuses osalejad kohaldaksid seda meedet ühetaoliselt.
Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Määrust (EÜ) nr 765/2006 tuleks seetõttu vastavalt muuta,
Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is amended as follows:
Määrust (EÜ) nr 765/2006 muudetakse järgmiselt.
in Article 2, paragraph 6 is deleted;
Artikli 2 lõige 6 jäetakse välja.
Article 8b is deleted;
Artikkel 8b jäetakse välja.
Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1).
Nõukogu 18. mai 2006. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 765/2006, milles käsitletakse piiravaid meetmeid Valgevene suhtes (ELT L 134, 20.5.2006, lk 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/278
Komisjoni rakendusmäärus (EL) 2016/278,
repealing the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not
millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks teatavate Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärit rauast või terasest kinnitusdetailide impordi suhtes kehtestatud lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks, mida on laiendatud Malaisiast lähetatud teatavate rauast või terasest kinnitusdetailide impordile, olenemata sellest, kas need deklareeritakse Malaisiast pärinevatena või mitte
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/476 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters [1] (‘the WTO enabling Regulation’), and in particular Article 1(1)(a) thereof,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 11. märtsi 2015. aasta määrust (EL) 2015/476 meetmete kohta, mida liit võib võtta pärast WTO vaidluste lahendamise organi aruannet dumpingu- ja subsiidiumivastaste meetmete kohta [1] (edaspidi „WTO võimaldamismäärus”), eriti selle artikli 1 lõike 1 punkti a,
The Council by Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 [2] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People's Republic of China (‘China’).
Nõukogu kehtestas määrusega (EÜ) nr 91/2009 [2] lõpliku dumpinguvastase tollimaksu teatavate Hiina Rahvavabariigist (edaspidi „Hiina”) pärit rauast või terasest kinnitusdetailide impordi suhtes.
On 28 July 2011, the Dispute Settlement Body (‘DSB’) of the World Trade Organisation (‘WTO’) adopted the Appellate Body Report and the Panel Report as modified by the Appellate Body Report in the dispute ‘European Communities — Definitive anti-dumping measures on certain iron or steel fasteners from China’ [3] (‘original reports’).
Maailma Kaubandusorganisatsiooni (edaspidi „WTO”) vaidluste lahendamise organ (edaspidi „VLO”) võttis 28. juulil 2011 vastu apellatsioonikogu aruande ja apellatsioonikogu aruandega muudetud hindamiskogu aruande vaidluse kohta „European Communities — Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Iron or Steel Fasteners from China” („Euroopa ühendused: Lõplik dumpinguvastane meede teatavate Hiinast pärit rauast või terasest kinnitusdetailide kohta”) [3] (edaspidi „esialgsed aruanded”).
Following a review to implement the original reports, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 [4] which amended Regulation (EC) No 91/2009.
Esialgsete aruannete rakendamist käsitleva läbivaatamise järel võttis nõukogu vastu rakendusmääruse (EL) nr 924/2012, [4] millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 91/2009.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/519 [5] the European Commission (‘Commission’), following an expiry review conducted under Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 [6], maintained the measures as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012.
Pärast aegumise läbivaatamist vastavalt nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1225/2009 [5] artikli 11 lõikele 2 jättis Euroopa Komisjon (edaspidi „komisjon”) rakendusmäärusega (EL) 2015/519 [6] kehtima rakendusmäärusega (EL) nr 924/2012 muudetud meetmed.
The measures maintained by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/519 took the form of an ad valorem duty established for individual sampled Chinese exporting producers at the level of 0,0 % to 69,7 %.
Rakendusmäärusega (EL) 2015/519 kehtima jäetud meetmetega kehtestati iga valimisse kaasatud Hiina eksportiva tootja suhtes väärtuseline tollimaks määraga 0,0–69,7 %.
At the same time the anti-dumping duty for the cooperating, non-sampled Chinese exporting producers was set at a level of 54,1 % while residual duty for non-cooperating Chinese exporting producers amounted to 74,1 %.
Valimisse kaasamata koostööd tegevate Hiina eksportivate tootjate dumpinguvastase tollimaksu määraks kehtestati samas 54,1 % ning koostööst keeldunud Hiina eksportivate tootjate dumpinguvastase jääktollimaksu määraks 74,1 %.
By Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 [7], as last amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 693/2012 [8], the measures were extended to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not.
Nõukogu määrusega (EL) nr 723/2011, [7] mida viimati muudeti rakendusmäärusega (EL) nr 693/2012, [8] laiendati meetmeid Malaisiast lähetatud teatavate rauast või terasest kinnitusdetailide impordile, olenemata sellest, kas need deklareeritakse Malaisiast pärinevatena või mitte.
B. COMPLIANCE REPORTS OF THE DSB OF THE WTO
B. WTO VAIDLUSTE LAHENDAMISE ORGANI VASTAVUSARUANDED
As referred to in recital 2 the Council implemented the original reports by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012.
Vastavalt põhjenduses 2 viidatule rakendas nõukogu esialgseid aruandeid rakendusmääruse (EL) nr 924/2012 alusel.
China, however, considered that the measure taken by the European Union through the Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 to implement the original reports was inconsistent with various provisions of the Anti-Dumping Agreement (‘ADA’) and the GATT 1994.
Hiina aga oli seisukohal, et Euroopa Liidu poolt rakendusmääruse (EL) nr 924/2012 alusel võetud meede esialgsete aruannete rakendamiseks oli vastuolus mitme WTO dumpinguvastase lepingu ja 1994. aasta üldise tolli- ja kaubanduskokkuleppe sättega.
On 30 October 2013, China requested consultations with the European Union pursuant to Articles 4 and 21.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (‘DSU’) of the WTO.
30. oktoobril 2013 taotles Hiina konsulteerimist Euroopa Liiduga vastavalt WTO vaidluste lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppe artiklile 4 ja artikli 21 lõikele 5.
On 5 December 2013, China requested the establishment of a panel under Article 21.5 of the DSU (‘compliance panel’).
5. detsembril 2013 taotles Hiina vastavalt vaidluste lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppe artikli 21 lõikele 5 hindamiskogu loomist.
On 27 March 2014, the Director-General of the WTO composed the compliance panel.
WTO peadirektor moodustas hindamiskogu 27. märtsil 2014.
On 7 August 2015, the compliance panel report [9] was circulated to Members of the WTO.
Hindamiskogu aruanne [9] esitati WTO liikmetele 7. augustil 2015.
On 9 September 2015, the European Union notified the DSB pursuant to Articles 16.4 and 17 of the DSU of its decision to appeal to the Appellate Body certain issues of law covered in the compliance panel report and certain legal interpretations developed by the panel.
9. septembril 2015 teavitas Euroopa Liit vastavalt vaidluste lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppe artikli 16 lõikele 4 ja artiklile 17 VLO-d oma otsusest esitada apellatsioonikogule apellatsioon teatavate hindamiskogu aruandes käsitletud õiguslike küsimuste ja teatavate hindamiskogu esitatud õiguslike tõlgenduste suhtes.
On 14 September 2015, China notified the DSB of its decision to cross-appeal.
14. septembril 2015 teavitas Hiina VLO-d oma otsusest esitada vastukaebus.
On 18 January 2016, the compliance Appellate Body report [10] was circulated to Members of the WTO.
Apellatsioonikogu aruanne [10] esitati WTO liikmetele 18. jaanuaril 2016.
The compliance panel report circulated on 7 August 2015 and the compliance Appellate Body report circulated on 18 January 2016 are referred to as ‘compliance reports’.
7. augustil 2015 avaldatud hindamiskogu aruandele ja 18. jaanuaril 2016 avaldatud apellatsioonikogu aruandele viidatakse kui „vastavusaruannetele”.
In the compliance reports, it was found, inter alia, that the EU acted inconsistently with:
Nimetatud vastavusaruannetes jõuti muu hulgas järeldusele, et EL ei toiminud kooskõlas järgmiste artiklitega: