natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Otherwise, the airport manager might experience cash flow difficulties during the years when it was not yet able to earn operating revenue from the new infrastructure.
Mitme konkurentsimoonutuse mõju liikmesriikidevahelisele kaubandusele ei tee üksteist kahjutuks, vaid need hoopis kuhjuvad ja ühisturule kahjulikud tagajärjed suurenevad“ (punkt 24).
The Commission also finds that the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement provided for an increase in the concession fee in 2007, i.e. two years after the planned commissioning of the new terminal (2005).
Hinnad, mida kohaldatakse Frankfurt-Hahni ja Londoni Stanstedi lennujaamas, on kõrgemad ja neid alandatakse vähem, kuigi Ryanair käitab 49 Londonist lähtuvat lennuliini ja 15 Frankfurt-Hahni lennujaamast lähtuvat lennuliini, samas kui Charlerois on neid lennuliine vaid 9.
Consequently, the Commission takes the view that a prudent operator would have agreed to BSCA paying the fee set by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement up to two years after the end of the year of commissioning of the new terminal (i.e. in 2007), but would have required BSCA to pay a market price fee after that date, i.e. a fee allowing the entity Region-SOWAER to achieve a zero net present value over the whole period.
12. detsembri 2000. aasta kohtuotsus: Aéroports de Paris vs. komisjon, T-128/98, EKL 2000, lk II-3929, EU:C:2000:290.
Table 31 shows:
14. jaanuari 2004. aasta kohtuotsus: Fleuren Compost BV vs. komisjon, T-109/01, EKL lk II-127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, punkt 18.
the variable concession fees expected from BSCA under the provisions in force at the time when the 2002 measure was granted [239];
Komisjoni 23. juuli 2008. aasta otsus 2008/948/EÜ Saksamaa meetmete kohta ettevõtte DHL ja Leipzig-Halle lennujaama kasuks C 48/06 (ex N 227/06) (ELT L 346, 23.12.2008, lk 1), põhjendus 291.
the additional concession fee, conceived as an annual fixed amount indexed at a rate of 2 % per year reflecting inflation [240], which BSCA should have paid from 2007 so that the concession fees payable by BSCA correspond to the market price concession fee in return for the 2002 agreements [241];
Vt Belgia 23. mail 2012 edastatud märkuste 3. lisa.
the additional concession fee, conceived as an annual fixed amount indexed at a rate of 2 % per year reflecting inflation, which BSCA should have paid from 2008 so that the concession fees payable by BSCA correspond to the market price concession fee in return for the 2003 investment decision [242];(a + b + c) represents the expected market price concession fees: their amounts are such that the net present value of the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision is zero.
Otsuse 2008/948/EÜ põhjendus 182.
Table 31
Kohtuotsus, Üldkohus, 24. märts 2011, Freistaat Sachsen vs. komisjon, T-443/08 ja T-455/08, [2011], EKL II-1311, punkt 225.
Expected market price concession fees
Vt joonealune märkus 89.
Concession fees expected from BSCA at the time when the 2002 measure was granted
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 24. juuli 2003, Altmark Trans, C-280/00, EKL 2003, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, lk I-7447.
Concession fees to be added to (a) so that the NPV of the 2002 measure equals 0
Institutsionaalse reformi seaduse artikli 6 lõige 1, X, 7, MS. 15. august 1980, lk 9434.
Concession fees to be added so that the NPV of the 2003 investment decision equals 0
Praegu Belgocontrol.
(a + b + c) Market price concession fees
M.S., 9. märts 1990, lk 4439.
The Commission has decided that the two-year delay in the work should be covered by the Region and SOWAER, and not by BSCA, as those entities were responsible for making the investments.
See ei kehti lennujaamade kohta.
As a result, the Commission has taken the view that BSCA should have paid the market price concession fee from the end of 2009 only, without, however, this concession fee being increased as it should have been from the end of 2007, as stipulated by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement.
Põhjendus 182.
It is the variable fees actually payable by BSCA (to which fees (b) and (c) shown in Table 31 should be added) that must be used to determine the market price concession fees that BSCA should have paid and that it shall pay in the future.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 16. detsembri 2002. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 2320/2002, millega kehtestatakse tsiviillennundusjulgestuse valdkonna ühiseeskirjad (EÜT L 355, 30.12.2002, lk 1).
It turns out that, even though traffic has proven to be much higher than predicted in 2002, the fees actually payable (shown in column (a) of Table 32) correspond to the expected variable concession fees (shown in column (a) of Table 31) due to the cap on the variable concession fee stipulated in 2002.
Punkt 5.1.
Table 32 shows the elements making up the market price concession fee:
Belgia 24. veebruari 2014. aasta kirja lisa 15.
Table 32
Vallooni piirkonna valitsuse heakskiidetud 8. novembri 2000. aasta märgukiri, lk 2.
Market price concession fees taking into account the delay in the work [243]
Komisjoni 28. novembri 2005. aasta otsus 2005/842/EÜ EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 86 lõike 2 kohaldamise kohta üldist majandushuvi pakkuvaid teenuseid osutavatele ettevõtjatele avalike teenuste eest makstava hüvitisena antava riigiabi suhtes (ELT L 312, 29.11.2005, lk 67).
More generally, beyond 2013, for example for year (2013 + n), the market price concession fee will be: (a) + (9348451 + 2640013) × (1,02)n, i.e. (a) + 11988464 × (1,02)n, where (a) is the variable part of the concession fee payable by BSCA for the year (2013 + n).
Komisjoni 28. oktoobri 2009. aasta otsus Pealinna Brüsseli piirkonna haiglavõrku IRIS kuuluvate avalik-õiguslike haiglate rahastamise kohta, NN 54/2009, Europa.
As explained at the end of recital 685, for the years 2014 and 2015, part (a) will probably be capped.
Vt joonealune märkus 103.
In these calculations of the net present value and market price concession fee for the 2002 and 2003 measures, the Commission has assumed that there will be no cap after 2015.
Komisjoni talituste töödokument, sageli esitatavad küsimused seoses komisjoni 28. novembri 2005. aasta otsusega EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 86 lõike 2 kohaldamise kohta üldist majandushuvi pakkuvaid teenuseid osutavatele ettevõtjatele avalike teenuste eest makstava hüvitisena antava riigiabi suhtes (SEC (2007) 1516 final, lk 6).
From 2016, part (a) of the market price concession fee will therefore be 35 % of the aviation revenue.
Nõukogu 22. märtsi 1999. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 659/1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (EÜT L 83, 27.3.1999, lk 1).
Based on the assumptions and methods described above and if the concession fee paid by BSCA remains unchanged, the Commission concludes that, due to the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, BSCA has received and will receive up to 31 December 2015 the aid amounts (excluding interest) corresponding to the sum of columns (b) and (c) in Table 32.
Vt komisjoni 15. detsembri 2006. aasta määruse (EÜ) nr 1998/2006 (mis käsitleb asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist vähese tähtsusega abi suhtes) (ELT L 379, 28.12.2006, lk 5) põhjendus 10.
These aid amounts are indicated in the following table:
Komisjoni 1. augusti 2006. aasta otsus, millega kehtestatakse struktuurifondidest antava abi (2000–2006) sulgemise suunised, COM (2006) 3424, seni avaldamata, veebisait Europa.
Table 33
Kohtuotsus, Üldkohus, 14. jaanuar 2004, Fleuren Compost BV vs. komisjon, T-109/01, EKL, lk II-127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, punkt 74.
Aid amounts received by BSCA up to 31 December 2015 — excluding interest — if the BSCA concession fee remains unchanged up to 31 December 2015
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 15. veebruar 2001, Austria vs. komisjon, C-99/98, EKL lk I-1101, ECLI:EU:C:2001:94, punktid 34, 35 ja 38.
Aid associated with the 2002 measure (excluding interest)
2004. aasta otsuse põhjendus 214.
Aid associated with the 2003 measure (excluding interest)
Kohtuotsus, 12. september 2000, liidetud kohtuasjad C-180/98 kuni C-184/98, Pavlov e.a., EKL 2000, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, lk I-6451.
Total aid (excluding interest)
Kohtuasi 118/85, 16. juuni 1987, komisjon vs. Itaalia, EKL 1987, lk 2599, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, punkt 7; kohtuasi C-35/96, 18. juuni 1998, komisjon vs. Itaalia, EKL 1998, lk I-3851, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, punkt 36; liidetud kohtuasjad C-180/98 kuni C-184/98, 12. september 2000, Pavlov e.a, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, lk I-6451, punkt 75.
As at 1 October 2014, date of this decision, BSCA has received, due to the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, the following aid amounts [244] (excluding interest):
Eespool nimetatud Leipzig-Halle kohtuotsuse punkt 102 ja sellele järgnevad punktid.
Table 34
Kohtuotsus, Üldkohus, 24. märts 2011, liidetud kohtuasjad T-455/08, Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH ja Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG vs. komisjon, ECLI:EU:T:2011:117, ja T-443/08, Freistaat Sachsen ja Land Sachsen-Anhalt vs. komisjon (edaspidi „Leipzig-Halle kohtuotsus“), seni avaldamata, punktid 93, 95, 100 ja 119.
Aid amounts received by BSCA up to 30 September 2014 — excluding interest
Vt ka kohtuotsus, Üldkohus, 12. detsember 2000, Aéroports de Paris vs. komisjon, T-128/98, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, lk II-3929, mida kinnitati järgmiste kohtuotsustega: Euroopa Kohus, 24. oktoober 2002, C-82/01 P, EKL 2002, lk I-9297, ECLI:EU:C:2002:617, ja kohtuotsus, Üldkohus, 17. detsember 2008, kohtuasi T-196/04, Ryanair vs. komisjon, EKL 2008, lk II-3643, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585, punkt 88.
Aid associated with the 2002 measure (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 17. veebruar 1993, liidetud kohtuasjad C-159/91, Poucer vs. AGV ja C-160/91, Pistre vs. Cancava, EKL 1993, lk I-637, ECLI:EU:C:1993:63.
Aid associated with the 2003 measure (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
ADP kohtuotsus.
Total aid (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
Kohtuotsus, 10. jaanuar 1994, kohtuasi C-364/92, SAT vs. Control, EKL 1994, lk I-43, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7, punkt 30, ja kohtuotsus, 26. märts 2009, kohtuasi C-113/07, Selex Sistemi Integrati vs. komisjon, EKL 2009, ECLI:EU:C:2009:191, lk I-2207, punkt 71.
Given the conclusions in Section 6.3.2 on the compatibility of the aid granted to BSCA, only the difference between the market price fee — calculated according to the methods described in recitals 680 to 683 — and the fee paid by BSCA since 4 April 2014 constitutes aid to be recovered.
Vt ka kohtuotsused, Üldkohus, 12. detsember 1996, riiklik lennuettevõtja Air France vs. komisjon, T-358/94, EKL 1996, lk II-2109, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, punkt 79; kohtuasi T-109/01, 14. jaanuar 2004, Fleuren Compost BV vs. komisjon, EKL 2004, lk II-127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, punkt 74; liidetud kohtuasjad T-362/05 ja T-363/05, 2. detsember 2008, Nuova Agricast Srl vs. komisjon, EKL 2008, ECLI:EU:T:2008:541, lk II-297, punkt 80; ning liidetud kohtuasjad T-427/04 ja T-17/05, 30. november 2009, Prantsusmaa ja France Télécom vs. komisjon, EKL 2009, lk II-4315, ECLI:EU:T:2009:474, punkt 321.
In addition, until the concession fee payable by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price fee, BSCA will continue to receive unlawful and incompatible aid, the amounts of which shall be recovered.
Vt joonealune märkus 37.
If the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased during 2014 to the level of the market price concession fee indicated in Table 32, the aid amount to be recovered — excluding interest — will be calculated according to the following formula:
Vt joonealune märkus 121.
Where N is the number of days between 4 April 2014 and the date on which the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price concession fee,
Lennundussuuniste punkt 35.
Aid amount to be recovered (excluding interest) = (N/365) × aid amount for 2014
Raadionavigatsioonisüsteem, mis abistab maandumisel halbade ilmastikutingimuste juures.
= (N/365) × EUR 12228234
Komisjoni 20. veebruari 2014. aasta otsus (EL) 2016/1698 meetmete SA.22932 (11/C) (ex NN 37/07) kohta, mida Prantsusmaa võttis Marseille Provence'i lennujaama ja seda lennujaama kasutavate lennuettevõtjate kasuks (ELT L 260, 27.9.2016, lk 1).
If the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased during 2015 to the level of the market price concession fee indicated in Table 32, the aid amount to be recovered — excluding interest — will be calculated according to the following formula:
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 18. märts 1997, Cali & Figli vs. Servizi Ecologici Porto di Genova, C-343/95, EKL 1997, lk I-1547, ECLI:EU:C:1997:160; komisjoni 19. märtsi 2003. aasta otsus kohtuasjas N 309/2002 ja komisjoni 16. oktoobri 2002. aasta otsus kohtuasjas N 438/2002 – abi sadamavaldajatele ametiülesannete täitmiseks.
Where N′ is the number of days between 1 January 2015 and the date on which the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price concession fee,
Vastavalt määrusele (EÜ) nr 2320/2002 on lennujulgestus määratletud kui „meetmete ja inim- ning loodusressursside kogum, mille eesmärk on kaitsta tsiviillennundust ebaseadusliku sekkumise eest“.
Aid amount to be recovered (excluding interest)
Lennujulgestuse valdkonna alusstandardid põhinevad Euroopa Tsiviillennunduse Konverentsi (ECAC) dokumendi nr 30 soovitustel ning on kindlaks määratud määruse (EÜ) nr 2320/2002 lisas.
= aid amount to be recovered for 2014 (excluding interest) + aid amount to be recovered for 2015 (excluding interest)
Vt joonealune märkus 129.
= ((number of days from 4 April to 31 December 2014)/365) × aid amount for 2014 + (N′/365) × aid amount for 2015
Piirkonna ja BSCA lepinguga lahutamatult seotud lisaleping nr 6.
= (272/365) × 12228234 + (N′/365) × 12472799
15. jaanuari 2008. aasta lisalepinguga nr 6 muudetud tehnilise kirjelduse punkt 25.2.
= EUR 9112547 + N′ × EUR 34172
Vt joonealune märkus 50.
The Belgian authorities must recover the amount calculated in accordance with the formulas given in recitals 692 and 693 within four months of the date of notification of this decision.
Vt joonealune märkus 52.
The Belgian authorities must add recovery interest to the amount to be recovered, which shall be calculated from the date on which the aid in question was at the disposal of the undertakings, namely on each effective date of granting of the aid, until the date of its effective recovery [245], in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [246].
Vt joonealune märkus 90.
The Commission considers that the date of disposal of the aid corresponds to the payment dates of the fees below market price, as set by the SOWAER/BSCA agreements in force at the time of the payments in question.
Lendude jälgimine ja registreerimine seisneb Vallooni piirkonna juhtkonna andmebaasi täiendamises ja hõlmab lendudega seotud teavet (reisijate arv, registrinumber, piloodi nimi, lennuki tüüp, lennu laad, lennu lähtepunkt, lennuki kaal jne).
This decision is without prejudice to the recovery of any other State aid granted to BSCA that is not covered by this decision.
Lennukite juhendamine hõlmab kaht ülesannet: i) lennukite juhendamine parkimiskohal (stand), mida teostab lennuvälja piirkondade koordinaator iga lennuki saabumise puhul ja ii) „follow me“ teenus, mis seisneb lennuki juhtimises vastava sõiduki abil nende pilootide puhul, kes lennujaama ei tunne (ärilennud) või koodiga D suurte lennukite puhul.
Belgium accepted that only the French version of the decision would be authentic and that the decision would take effect on its notification in French,
Vt joonealune märkus 85.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Kohtuotsus, 11. juuli 1996, Euroopa Kohus, SFEI jt, C-39/94, EKL 1996, I-3547, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, punkt 60; kohtuotsus, 29. aprill 1999, Euroopa Kohus, Hispaania vs. komisjon, C-342/96, EKL 1999, I-2459, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210, punkt 41.
Article 1
Vt joonealune märkus 92.
The aid measures granted to Ryanair Ltd (hereinafter ‘Ryanair’), namely the undertaking of the Walloon Government to Ryanair of 6 November 2001, the contract between BSCA and Ryanair of 2 December 2001, the Promocy agreement of 12 December 2001, the contract between Promocy and Leading Verge of 31 January 2002, the Ministerial Order of 11 June 2004, the letter from BSCA to Ryanair of 24 June 2004, the commercial agreement between BSCA and Ryanair of 9 December 2005, the amendment of 6 December 2010 to the contract between BSCA and Ryanair, and the sale of BSCA's shares in Promocy on 31 March 2010, do not constitute State aid to Ryanair under Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
ELT C 8, 11.1.2012, lk 4.
The aid measures granted to Brussels South Charleroi Airport (hereinafter ‘BSCA’), consisting of the agreement between the Société wallonne des aéroports (hereinafter ‘SOWAER’) and BSCA of 4 April 2006, Amendment No 5 to the agreement between the Walloon Region and BSCA of 10 March 2006, and Amendment No 6 to the agreement between the Walloon Region and BSCA of 15 January 2008, do not constitute State aid to BSCA under Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Komisjoni 25. juuli 2012. aasta otsus 2013/664/EL, mis käsitleb meedet SA.23324 (C 25/07) (ex NN 26/07) – Soome Finavia, Airpro ja Ryanairi tegevus Tampere-Pirkkala lennujaamas (ELT L 309, 19.11.2013, lk 27).
Article 2
Vt Vallooni piirkonna valitsuse majanduse valdkonna eest vastutava ministri 8. novembri 2000. aasta märgukiri.
The aid measures unlawfully granted by Belgium, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to BSCA under the sub-concession agreement of 15 April 2002 between SOWAER and BSCA and Amendment No 3 of 29 March 2002 to the agreement between the Walloon Region and BSCA, and also under the investment decision of the Walloon Region of 3 April 2003, constitute State aid compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union up to 3 April 2014.
Kohtuotsus, 21. jaanuar 1999, Üldkohus, Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke ja Lech-Stahlwerke vs. komisjon, liidetud kohtuasjad T-129/95, T-2/96 ja T-97/96, EKL 1999, lk II-17, ECLI:EU:T:1999:7, punkt 120.
Assuming that it does constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the capital increase in BSCA subscribed on 3 December 2002 by SOWAER is State aid compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sama kasvumäära, 2 %, kasutati piirkonna-SOWAERi järjestikustes lepingutes, näiteks muutuva suurusega tasu ülempiiri suurenemise määra puhul.
Article 3
Kohtuotsus, 11. juuli 1996, Euroopa Kohus, SFEI jt, C-39/94, EKL 1996, I-3547, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, punktid 60 ja 61.
The aid measures unlawfully granted by Belgium, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to BSCA under the sub-concession agreement of 15 April 2002 between SOWAER and BSCA and Amendment No 3 of 29 March 2002 to the agreement between the Walloon Region and BSCA, and also under the investment decision of the Walloon Region of 3 April 2003, constitute State aid incompatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(1) of said Treaty from 4 April 2014.
Vastavalt Charleroi lennujaama investeerimiskavale, mis oli lisatud SOWAERi ja BSCA 15. aprilli 2002. aasta lepingule.
Article 4
BSCA esitatud andmete põhjal.
Belgium shall put an end to the aid measures referred to in Article 3 by increasing the concession fee payable by BSCA at least to the level of the market price concession fee and by recovering from the beneficiary the aid amounts received under the aid measures referred to in Article 3 as from 4 April 2014.
Vt Vallooni piirkonna 23. mai 2001. aasta otsusele lisatud SOWAERi äriplaan, lk 10.
The amounts to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were placed at the disposal of the beneficiary to the date of their effective recovery.
Vt põhjenduse 431 lõpp.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Allikas: Damodaran: Risk Premiums for Other Markets 2001 (http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~ADAMODAR/)
Belgium shall cancel all pending payments with regard to the aid measures referred to in Article 3 from the date of adoption of this decision.
Beetakoefitsiendi puhul on tegemist rahaliste vahendite hindamise meetodi puhul kasutatava põhiteguriga.
Article 5
Selle abil mõõdetakse teatud vara kasumlikkust võrreldes turuga.
The recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3 shall be immediate and effective.
Vt joonealune märkus 156.
Belgium shall ensure that this decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification.
Belgia kümneaastase tähtajaga võlakirjade intressimäär 2002. aasta aprillis.
Article 6
Belgia 7. veebruaril 2014 komisjonile edastatud märkus (küsimus 13), nimetusega „Vastus komisjoni 14. jaanuari 2014. aasta teabenõudele“.
Belgium shall submit the following information to the Commission within two months of the notification of this decision:
Belgia nimetab neid teenuseid „mittemajanduslikeks teenusteks“.
the dates on which BSCA has paid the concession fees in 2014 and the calculation of the recovery interest;
Kohtuotsus, 2. juuli 1974, kohtuasi 173/73, Itaalia vs. komisjon, EKL 1974, EU:C:1974:71, lk 709.
a detailed description of the measures already adopted and planned for the purpose of complying with this decision;
Vt joonealune märkus 155.
the documents proving that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
Belgia kümneaastase tähtajaga võlakirjade intressimäär 2003. aasta aprillis.
Belgium shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures adopted pursuant to this decision until the recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3 has been concluded.
Näiteks suurendades kogutulu säilitamise eesmärgil maapealse teenindamise tasusid.
At the Commission's request, it shall immediately submit information on the measures already adopted and planned for the purpose of complying with this decision.
19. detsembri 2007. aasta dekreet, millega muudeti 23. juuni 1994. aasta dekreeti Vallooni piirkonnaga seotud lennujaamade ja lennuväljade rajamise ja käitamise kohta.
It shall also provide detailed information on the aid amounts and interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Aruande esitas 6. detsembril 2007 Vallooni piirkonna parlamendi maakorralduse, transpordi, energia ja eluasemekomisjoni nimel E. Stoffels seoses dekreedi eelnõuga, millega muudeti 23. juuni 1994. aasta dekreeti Vallooni piirkonnaga seotud lennujaamade ja lennuväljade rajamise ja käitamise kohta.
Article 7
Ühtse halduse all tuleb mõista seda, et lennujaamu käitavad äriühingud vastutavad kogu kliendihalduse, sealhulgas ka julgestuse ja ohutusega seotud ülesannete eest.
This decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium.
Deloitte & Touche'i aruandes on märgitud, et „sellest analüüsist ilmne,et muudetud äriplaani alusel ja prognoositava 10aastase investeerimisperioodi puhul on investeeritud vahendite keskmine aastane kasumlikkus 27 %“ ning et „seda määra tuleb võrrelda sellelaadse tegevuse tururiski määraga, mis ulatub 15 %ni aastas“.
Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.
Kohtuotsus, Üldkohus, 12. mai 2011, Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais, liidetud kohtuasjad T-267/08 ja T-279/08, EKL 2011, ECLI:EU:T:2011:209, lk II-1999, punkt 108.
For the Commission
Kohtuotsus, Euroopa Kohus, 16. mai 2002, Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Komisjon (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, EKL 2002, I-4397, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294.
Vice-President
Belgia 21. septembri 2011. aasta märkus (küsimus 2).
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (‘TEC’) have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ‘TFEU’).
Kaugused on toodud veebisaidil https://maps.google.com.
The two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical.
http://www.charleroi-airport.com/laeroport/localisation-et-bassin-dattraction/index.html.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty.
Vt joonealune märkus 174.