natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Aid application by the beneficiary on 5 March 2010, confirmation of Hungary of 26 March 2010 that the investment is in principle eligible for aid as well as the initial aid offer of Hungary of 30 March 2010 happened before any of the options would have been eliminated.
ABI POSITIIVSE JA NEGATIIVSE MÕJU KAALUMINE
The cost estimates presented to the Group Management Board on […] 2010 already included the potential State aid to be granted by Hungary.
Olles kindlaks teinud, et abi stimuleerib investeeringu tegemist asjaomases piirkonnas ja et see on proportsionaalne, tuleb kaaluda positiivset ja negatiivset mõju.
At that point in time, a potential aid from [country 1 of the EEA]. was also taken into account, but later dismissed, as it would not have been realistic to receive the aid in [country 1 of the EEA] [49].
Hindamine kinnitas, et abimeede avaldab ergutavat mõju investeeringute ligimeelitamisel, aidates märkimisväärselt kaasa ebasoodsas olukorras oleva piirkonna arengule, mis on Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti a kohaselt rahastamiskõlblik, ilma et see kahjustaks sama või kõrgema abi ülemmääraga piirkonda (ei avalda ühtekuuluvust kahjustavat mõju).
As described in recital 80 of this decision, the final estimates for production costs attributable to the location resulted in a cost disadvantage of EUR 143,3 million for Option D (Győr) compared to Option C ([location 2 in an assisted area in EEA eligible for regional aid pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU], and [location 1 in a non-assisted area in the EEA],) at the time when the two investment and location options were presented for a final decision to be taken by K-VAI on 14 December 2010.
Komisjoni hinnangul on investeering vaesemasse piirkonda liidu ühtekuuluvuse jaoks tähtsam kui sama investeering soodsamas olukorras olevasse piirkonda.
As documented by the minutes of the K-VAI meeting, on the basis of that counterfactual analysis, and of certain qualitative criteria, as well as on the basis of the availability of State aid, the K-VAI decided to locate the investment project in Győr on 14 December 2010.
Komisjon lähtub vastavalt süvahindamise teatise punktile 53 sellest, et „teisalt ollakse üldiselt seisukohal, et sellise regionaalabi positiivne mõju, millega kompenseeritakse ainult puhaskulude vahe võrreldes arenenuma alternatiivse investeerimise sihtkohaga […], kaalub üles kõik uue investeeringu alternatiivse sihtkohaga seotud negatiivsed mõjud“.
The Commission reaffirms its view (see recital 110 of this decision), taken already in the opening decision, that the formal requirements in respect of the incentive effect laid down in paragraph 38 of the RAG 2007-13 were met: (i) with regard to the grant — as explained in recital 23 of this decision — the beneficiary submitted an application for aid and the authority responsible for administering the scheme subsequently confirmed in writing that, subject to detailed verification, the project in principle met the conditions of eligibility laid down by the scheme, before works on the project started; (ii) concerning the tax allowance, as described in recital 24 of this decision, the beneficiary applied for it well before the start of works, and as for the tax allowance there is a legal entitlement — subject to Commission approval — there was no need for the beneficiary to wait for any preliminary eligibility confirmation from the Hungarian authorities.
Eeltoodud kaalutluste alusel lähtub komisjon lisaks sellest, et abi puhul, mis võrdub valitud asukohas teostatava investeerimisprojekti puhaskulude ja arenenumas alternatiivses asukohas tekkivate puhaskulude vahega, kaalub positiivne mõju eesmärke ja proportsionaalsust silmas pidades (vt ülal) üles negatiivse mõju kaubandusele alternatiivses asukohas.
The Commission considers with regard to the substantive incentive effect that the aid effectively had an impact on the investment's location choice: VW Group's decision to locate the investment project in question in Győr was taken only after confirmation that the investment project would be eligible for State aid and supported by public authorities and the K-VAI (the body responsible for taking the final decision about the investment and the location) approved the location subject to the availability of State aid.
2007.–2013. aasta regionaalabi suuniste punkti 68 alusel ja võttes arvesse süvahindamise teatise alusel tehtud süvahindamist, teeb komisjon järelduse, et abi on investeeringute ligimeelitamiseks ergutava mõjuna vajalik ja et abimeetme eelised tasakaalustavad sellest tuleneva konkurentsimoonutuse ja mõju liikmesriikide vahelisele kaubandusele.
Therefore, the Commission considers, in accordance with paragraph 23 and 25 of the IDAC that the counterfactual scenario presented by Hungary is realistic and supported by genuine and contemporary evidence.
KOKKUVÕTE
The aid therefore has a real (substantive) incentive effect.
Komisjon on seisukohal, et Ungari on ebaseaduslikult andnud regionaalabi AHMi investeerimisprojekti jaoks vastuolus ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõikega 3.
By reducing the viability gap in favour of Győr, the aid contributed to changing the location decision of the beneficiary company.
Komisjon aga järeldab, et regionaalabi ettevõtjale AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Ltd, mida anti enne 1. juulit 2014 tingimusel, et komisjon annab selleks loa, on vastavuses kõikide 2007.–2013. aasta regionaalabi suuniste ja süvahindamise teatise tingimustega ning seega võib seda Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti a kohaselt käsitleda siseturuga kokkusobivana,
Without the aid, the investment would not have taken place in Győr.
ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE:
For the aid to be proportional, the amount and intensity of the aid must be limited to the minimum needed for the investment to take place in the assisted region.
Artikkel 1
In general, regional aid is considered to be proportional to the seriousness of the problems affecting the assisted regions if it respects the applicable regional aid ceiling, including the automatic, progressive scaling-down of the regional aid ceiling for large investment projects (which is already part of the applicable regional aid map).
Ettevõtjale AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Ltd Ungari poolt antud riigiabi väärtuses kuni 39952 miljonit Ungari forintit (nüüdisväärtus, diskonteeritud teate esitamise ajahetkele), mille abi ülemmäär on 11,24 % brutotoetusekvivalendist, on ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti a kohaselt siseturuga kokkusobiv.
The applied aid intensity in this case is not higher than the regional aid ceilings corrected by the scaling-down mechanism, as already established in recital 110 of this decision.
Artikkel 2
In addition to the general principle of proportionality contained in the RAG 2007-13, the IDAC requires a more detailed assessment to be carried out.
Käesolev otsus on adresseeritud Ungarile.
Under scenario 2 of the IDAC, the aid is considered proportionate if it equals the difference between the net costs for the beneficiary to invest in the assisted region and the net costs to invest in the alternative location.
Brüssel, 1. veebruar 2016
The Commission considers on the basis of the documentation submitted (see recital 79 to 82) that the aid was limited to the amount necessary, because it does not exceed the difference in costs between Option D (locating the investment in Győr) and Option C (locating the investment in [location 2 in an assisted area in EEA eligible for regional aid pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU] and [location 1 in a non-assisted area in the EEA]).
Komisjoni nimel
The calculation done at the time of the counterfactual analysis shows that without the aid, Győr was by EUR 144,3 million more expensive (in present value of 2010) than the location combination of [location 2 in an assisted area in EEA eligible for regional aid pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU] and [location 1 in a non-assisted area in the EEA].
Margrethe Vestager
This cost disadvantage amounts to EUR 153,8 million in 2013 terms, which is the year applicable for the calculation of the aid, and therefore also for the proportionality.
ELT C 418, 21.11.2014, lk 25.
The gap due to the higher one-time expenditure could be narrowed by the possible State aid.
Regionaalabi suunised aastateks 2007–2013 (ELT C 54, 4.3.2006, lk 13).
Considering the aid of EUR 133,3 million in present value of 2013, Option D still has a cost disadvantage of EUR 20,5 million relative to Option C. The Commission notes that the remaining cost disadvantage was acceptable by Volkswagen Group due to certain, non-quantifiable advantages of Győr, e.g. the possibility to produce all four MQB derivatives in a single plant of AUDI, and considers that the proportionality of the aid is demonstrated.
28. juunil 2013 võttis komisjon vastu regionaalabi suunised aastateks 2014–2020, millega ta pikendas regionaalabi suuniste kohaldamisperioodi 30. juunini 2014 (punkt 186) (ELT C 209, 23.1.2013, lk 1).
Paragraph 40 of the IDAC states that ‘if […] the counterfactual analysis suggests that without the aid the investment would have gone ahead in any case, albeit possibly in another location (scenario 2), and if the aid is proportional, possible indications of distortions such as a high market share and an increase in capacity in an underperforming market would in principle be the same regardless of the aid.’
ELT C 223, 16.9.2009, lk 3.
As the aid measure supports a scenario 2 investment decision and the aid is limited to the minimum, no negative effects on competition could be identified.
Vt joonealune märkus 1.
The investment would have been carried out in another location, resulting in the same level of distortion of competition in any event.
Riigiabi N 487/2006 – Ungari regionaalabi kaart 2007–2013 (ELT C 256, 24.10.2006, lk 6), pikendatud riigiabiga nr SA.36879 (2013/N) – Ungari 2007.–2013. aasta regionaalabi kaardi pikendamine 30. juunini 2014 (ELT C 69, 7.3.2014, lk 1).
Therefore, the Commission considers that the aid has no negative effects on competition.
72 Euroopas ning 46 Ameerika, Aasia ja Aafrika riikides.
In accordance with paragraph 53 of the IDAC, if, without aid, the investment would have been located in a poorer region (more regional handicaps — higher maximum regional aid intensity) or in a region that is considered to have the same regional handicaps as the target region (same maximum regional aid intensity), this would constitute a negative element in the overall balancing test that is unlikely to be compensated by any positive elements, because it runs counter the very rationale of regional aid.
Volkswageni grupi 2014. aasta aruanne.
As Hungary confirmed that the theoretical possibility of setting up a new production plant in Eastern Europe was discarded by AUDI in the early stages of the decision-making process and that none of the existing sites with higher or same aid intensity was considered as a feasible location (see footnote 23), the Commission considers that the aid has no anti-cohesion effect that would run counter the very rationale of regional aid.
Konfidentsiaalne informatsioon
BALANCING OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF THE AID
R. L. Polk & Co. (ka POLK) on globaalselt integreeritud organisatsioon ning turuteabe ja -analüütika peamisi pakkujaid autotööstuses.
Having established that the aid provides an incentive for carrying out the investment in the region concerned and is proportionate, it is necessary to balance the positive effects of the aid with its negative effects.
16. juulil 2013 viis maailmas juhtiv kriitilise teabe ja analüütika pakkuja IHS Inc. lõpule R. L. Polk & Co omandamise.
The assessment confirmed that the aid measure has an incentive effect attracting an investment which offers an important contribution to the regional development of a disadvantaged region which is eligible for regional aid pursuant to Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU, without depriving from the investment any region with the same or a higher aid intensity ceiling (no anti-cohesion effect).
POLKi lisandumisega pakub IHS Automotive ekspertteadmisi ja prognoose terves autotööstuse väärtusahelas.
The Commission considers that attracting an investment to a poorer region is more beneficial for cohesion within the Union than if the same investment had been located in a more developed region.
POLK liigitab autoturu segmentidesse A000, A00, A0, A, B, C, D ja E, kus A000-segmendi moodustavad väikesed linnaautod ja E-segmendi ultra-luksusautod.
As stated in paragraph 53 of the IDAC, the Commission considers that ‘the positive effects of regional aid which merely compensate for the difference in net costs relative to a more developed alternative investment location […], will normally be considered, under the balancing test, to outweigh any negative effects in the alternative location for new investment’.
A000-segmendist E-segmendini suureneb järk-järgult sõiduautode keskmine hind, suurus ja mootori keskmine jõudlus.
In view of the above, the Commission finds that, given that the aid is proportional to the difference in net costs for carrying out the investment in the selected location, as compared to a more developed alternative location, the positive effects of the aid, in terms of its objective and appropriateness, as demonstrated above, outweigh the negative effects in the alternative location.
Eurodes esitatud arvud on käesolevas otsuses väljendatud vahetuskursi 299,67 Ungari forintit / euro alusel, mis kehtis teavitamise ajal.
In accordance with paragraph 68 of the RAG 2007-13, and in light of the in-depth assessment conducted on the basis of the IDAC, the Commission concludes that the aid is necessary to provide an incentive effect for the investment and that the benefits of the aid measure outweigh the resulting distortion of competition and negative effect on trade between Member States.
Käesolevas otsuses on nüüdisväärtused arvutatud 5,62 % diskontomäära alusel, mis kehtis teavitamise ajal.
CONCLUSION
Diskonteerimise aluseks on võetud 2013. aasta ehk teavitamisaasta.
The Commission finds that Hungary has unlawfully implemented regional aid in favour of the investment project by AHM in breach of Article 108(3) of the TFEU.
Abikava XR 47/2007 (A Kormány egyedi döntésével megítélhető támogatás) kokkuvõtlik teabeleht avaldati Euroopa Liidu Teatajas ELT C 180, 2.8.2007, lk 6.
However, the Commission concludes that the regional investment aid in favour of AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Ltd — awarded before 1 July 2014 under the condition that it is partly subject to Commission approval — fulfils all the conditions laid down in the RAG 2007-13 and in the IDAC and can therefore be considered compatible with the internal market in accordance with Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU,
Komisjoni 24. oktoobri 2006. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 1628/2006, mis käsitleb asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist investeeringuteks ette nähtud regionaalabi suhtes (ELT L 302, 1.11.2006, lk 29).
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Komisjoni 10. mai 2007. aasta otsus juhtumi N 651/2006 kohta, mis käsitleb maksusoodustuste arendamist (N 504/2004 muudatus) (ELT C 152, 6.7.2007, lk 2), ning mida on muudetud komisjoni 30. aprilli 2008. aasta otsusega (N 646/2007, SA.24441), 17. juuni 2008. aasta otsusega (N 735/2007, SA.24683), 6. mai 2010. aasta otsusega (N 132/2010, SA.30728) ja 23. veebruari 2011. aasta otsusega (N 685/2009, SA.29994).
Article 1
See lähenemisviis on kooskõlas järgmiste komisjoni riigiabi otsustega: SA.30340 (Fiat Powertrain Technologies), 9.2.2011 (C(2011) 612), juhtum SA.30340 (ELT C 151, 21.5.2011, lk 5); SA.
The State aid which Hungary has implemented for AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Ltd amounting to a maximum of HUF 39952 million (discounted to the date of notification) in present value and representing a maximum aid intensity of 11,24 % in gross grant equivalent is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU.
32169 (Volkswagen Sachsen), 13.7.2011 (C(2011) 4935), juhtum SA.32169 (ELT C 361, 10.12.2011, lk 17); N 767/07 (Ford Craiova), 30.4.2008 (C(2008) 1613), juhtum N 767/2007 (ELT C 238, 17.9.2008, lk 4); N 635/2008 (Fiat Sicily), 29.4.2009 (C(2009) 3051), juhtum N 635/2008 (ELT C 219, 12.9.2009, lk 3); ning N 473/2008 (Ford Espana), 17.6.2009 (C(2009) 4530), juhtum N 473/2008 (ELT C 19, 26.1.2010, lk 5).
Article 2
Vt N 671/2008, Mercedes-Benz Hungary (kõrvuti asetsevate A- ja B-segmendi kattuvus), SA.32169 Volkswagen Sachsen, põhjendus 60 ff ning SA.32076 Ford Espana, põhjendus 83 (A0- ja B-segmendi autode ning A-segmendi autode nõudluse poole ahela asendatavus).
This Decision is addressed to Hungary.
Artikli „Preliminary Economic Analysis of the Geographic Market“, Dr James A. Langenfeld, Navigant Economics (2011)., andmetel, kus näidatakse, et ajavahemikus 2004–2010 eksporditi EMPs toodetud ligikaudu 13 % A-segmendi autodest ja üle 25 % B-segmendi autodest teistesse maailma piirkondadesse.
Done at Brussels, 1 February 2016.
Imporditud autodest oli EMPs müüdud üle 14 % A-segmendi autodest ja üle 18 % B-segmendi autodest toodetud teistes piirkondades.
For the Commission
„Preliminary Economic Analysis of the Geographic Market“, Dr James A. Langenfeld, Navigant Economics (2011).
Member of the Commission
Ungari võttis kordaja 2,5 aluseks uuringu, milles hinnati mootorsõidukite tarnijate sektori panust Ameerika Ühendriikide ja selle 50 osariigi majandusse.
OJ C 418, 21.11.2014, p. 25.
Uuringu viis 2007. aastal mootorite ja varustuse tootjate ühenduse Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association tellimusel läbi autotööstusuuringute keskuse Center of Automotive Research majandus- ja ettevõtlusrühm Economics and Business Group.
Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13).
Juba on loodud AUDI HUNGARIA sõidukiehituse osakonna rühm koostöös sisepõlemismootorite osakonna, materjaliteaduse ja -tehnoloogia osakonna ning sõidukite valmistamise osakonnaga.
On 28 June 2013 the Commission adopted the Guidelines on Regional State Aid for 2014-2020, in which it extended the period of application of the RAG until 30 June 2014 (paragraph 186) (OJ C 209, 23.1.2013, p. 1).
A3 Cabriolet' ja A3 Sedani tootmise algus kavandati 2012. aasta novembrisse ja 2013. aasta märtsi, TT Coupé ja TT Roadsteri tootmise algus aga vastavalt 2014. aasta veebruarisse ja septembrisse.
OJ C 223, 16.9.2009, p. 3.
Kui tootearenduse ja planeerimise etapis piirnes asukoha eelvalimine AUDI asukohtadega, st [asukoht nr 3 abi mittesaavas piirkonnas EMPs], ja Győriga, siis selles etapis vaadeldi asukohta grupi tasandil ja töötati välja alternatiivsed stsenaariumid.
See footnote 1.
Juba kolm kuud enne uut A3 Sedani käsitleva tooteotsuse tegemist […] 2010. aastal, alustas [grupi järelevalveosakond] eri asukohtade ja investeerimisstsenaariumide võrdlemisega.
State Aid N 487/2006 — Hungary Regional State aid map 2007-2013 (OJ C 256, 24.10.2006, p. 6) and prolonged by State aid No.
2008. aastal kaalus AUDI kontseptuaalselt Ida-Euroopas täiesti uude objekti investeerimise ideed, mida järgmistes planeerimisetappides edasi ei arendatud.
SA.36879 (2013/N) — Hungary Prolongation of the Regional aid map 2007-2013 until 30 June 2014 (OJ C 69, 7.3.2014, p. 1).
[Grupi järelevalveosakonna] ja AUDI ettevalmistatud otsuse soovituses, mis esitati grupi juhtkonna koosolekul […] 2010. aastal, tutvustati täiesti uude objekti investeerimist ebarealistliku võimalusena investeerimisraamistiku ja kavandatud tootmistähtaegadest tulenevate ajapiirangute tõttu.
72 in Europe and 46 in countries in America, Asia and Africa.
Ungari esitas teabe, milles oli näidatud kõik VW grupi olemasolevad asukohad 30 % või suurema abi osakaaluga piirkonnas (st sama või suurem abi osakaal kui Győris).
Annual Report 2014 Volkswagen Group.
Kuid ühtki neist asukohtadest ei saanud arvestada, sest need ei vastanud laiendamis- või kohandamisruumi ja/või kokkusobiva struktuuri kriteeriumile.
Business secret
Nendest tootmiskohtadest üheski ei olnud piisavalt vaba ruumi investeerimisprojekti mahutamiseks.
R. L. Polk & Co. (also referred to as POLK) is a globally integrated organisation and a major market information and analytics provider in the automotive industry.
Grupi tasandil teeb juhatus investeerimisprojektide ja nende asukoha kohta otsuseid komisjoni K-VAI (investeerimisnõukogu komisjon) kaudu [grupi järelevalveosakonna] läbiviidud analüüsi põhjal.
On 16 July 2013, IHS Inc., the leading global source of critical information and analytics completed its acquisition of R. L. Polk & Co.
Kuluhalvemuse väärtus tuleb kindlaks teha 2013. aasta hindades, et seda saaks võrrelda võimaliku riigiabiga (mis on kehtestatud 2013. aasta hindades) ja selle kaudu teha selgeks Győri netokuluhalvemus.
With the addition of POLK, IHS Automotive provides expertise and predictive insight across the entire automotive value chain.
Näib, et selle arvutuse jaoks on asjakohane kasutada investeerimisotsuse tegemise hetkel euroalas kehtinud diskontomäära (2010. aasta detsember, st 2,45 %), sest investeerimisotsuse, milles kasutati vääringuna eurot – võttes arvesse hinnangulisi kulusid eurodes –, tegi ettevõte, mille peakorter asub euroalas.
POLK differentiates the car market along segments A000, A00, A0, A, B, C, D and E, where segment A000 means urban small cars and segment E is the ultra-luxury category.
See abisumma põhineb 1186 miljoni euro suurusel kavandatud rahastamiskõlblikul investeerimiskulul.
Figures expressed in EUR are given in this decision on the basis of an exchange rate of 299,67 HUF/EUR, applicable at the time of notification
Nõukogu 13. juuli 2015. aasta määrus (EL) 2015/1589, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (ELT L 248, 24.9.2015, lk 9).
The present values in this decision are calculated on the basis of a discounting rate of 5,62 percent, applicable at the time of notification.
Ungari märkuste esitamise ajal oli asjakohane säte muidugi artikli 1 punkt f nõukogu 22. märtsi 1999. aasta määruses (EÜ) nr 659/1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad Euroopa liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (EÜT L 83, 27.3.1999, lk 1).
The base year for discounting purposes is 2013, i.e. the year of notification.
Vt joonealune märkus 12.
The summary information sheet on the scheme XR 47/2007 (A Kormány egyedi döntésével megítélhető támogatás) was published in OJ C 180, 2.8.2007, p. 6.
Süvahindamise teatise punkti 56 joonealune märkus 1.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 of 24 October 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid (OJ L 302, 1.11.2006, p. 29).
Ungari ametiasutuste tegevus on samuti kooskõlas komisjoni varasema praktikaga, vt IBIDENi käsitleva otsuse punktid 28 ja 110; selle juhtumi korral oli abi ettevõttele IBIDEN HU juba antud (enne komisjoni teavitamist) olemasolevate regionaalabi kavade alusel kuni individuaalse teavitamise künniseni ja ainult ülejäänud abisumma kohta oli vaja komisjoni heakskiitu.
Commission decision of 10 May 2007 in case N 651/2006 concerning the Development tax benefit (amendment of N 504/2004) (OJ C 152, 6.7.2007, p. 2). and modified by Commission decision of 30 April 2008 (N 646/2007, SA.24441), of 17 June 2008 (N 735/2007, SA.24683), of 6 May 2010 (N 132/2010, SA.30728) and of 23 February 2011 (N 685/2009, SA.29994).
Ainult teavitamiskünnist ületava osa kohta on vaja komisjoni heakskiitu, nagu on mainitud Evelina TUMASONYTĖ, Živilė DIDŽIOKAITĖ ja András TARI artiklis „State aid to IBIDEN Hungary“, mis ilmus konkurentsipoliitika uudiskirjas, 2008, nr 2, lk 69.
This approach is in line with the Commission's State aid decisions SA.30340 (Fiat Powertrain Technologies), decision of 9 February 2011 (C(2011) 612) in the case of SA.30340 (OJ C 151, 21.5.2011, p. 5); SA.
Vt otsus kohtuasjas C-301/87: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. komisjon (Boussac) (EKL 1990, lk I-307, punkt 33).