natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At the same time it should be noted that, before Zweibrücken entered the market in 2006, Frankfurt Hahn airport was already a well-established airport with more than 3 million passengers and channelling 123000 tonnes of freight.
Nimi „Fraport“ tähistab käesolevas otsuses edaspidi nii enne ettevõtja ärinime muutmist kasutatud nime „FAG“ kui ka hiljem kasutatud nime „Fraport AG“.
In view of the historical development of the two airports, their geographical location and the free capacity available at Frankfurt Hahn airport at the time when Zweibrücken airport entered the commercial aviation market in 2006, the Commission concludes that it is rather the opening of Zweibrücken airport which constituted an unnecessary duplication of infrastructure.
Konfidentsiaalne teave.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that the investments into Frankfurt Hahn airport do not constitute a duplication of existing non-profitable infrastructure.
Ostulepingu 7. jao punkti 3 kohaselt võidakse seda summat vähendada, näiteks juhul, kui FFHG kulutused mürakaitsele ületavad teatavat ülemmäära.
On the contrary, Frankfurt Hahn airport has played an important role in decongesting Frankfurt Main airport without limiting the latter's plans to expand.
45,24 % Fraporti aktsiatest kuulus Hesseni liidumaale, 28,89 % ettevõtjale Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main Holding GmbH (mis kuulus 100 % Maini-äärse Frankfurti omavalitsusele) ja 25,87 % Saksamaa Liitvabariigile.
Without the investments into Frankfurt Hahn airport there was in fact a risk that the region would be underserved in terms of its transport needs.
Wizz Air on Ungari lennuettevõtja ja Euroopa odavlennuettevõtjate liidu liige.
In the light of the considerations in recitals 512 to 523, the Commission therefore concludes that the investment aid directed at the construction and operation of infrastructure at Frankfurt Hahn airport meets a clearly defined objective of common interest, namely regional economic development, creation of jobs and improvement of the accessibility of the region.
Wizz Airi kontsern koosneb kolmest tegutsevast ettevõtjast, nimelt Wizz Air Hungary, Wizz Air Bulgaria ja Wizz Air Ukraine.
According to Germany, the investments were undertaken according to the needs (and were thus proportionate) and the constructed infrastructure was necessary for the airport in order to serve the connectivity and the development of the region and to decongest Frankfurt Main airport.
Lennuettevõtja ärimudel on seotud teisejärguliste piirkondlike lennujaamadega.
Based on the information provided by Germany, the Commission agrees that the financed investments were necessary and proportionate to the objective of common interest.
Lennuettevõtja lendab praegu ligikaudu 150 Euroopa sihtkohta.
Indeed, without those investments the conversion of the former U.S. base into a fully functioning civil aviation airport could not have been completed.
Wizz Airil on ühtne lennukipark, mille keskmine vanus jääb alla kolme aasta ja mis koosneb Airbus A 320 tüüpi 34 lennukist 180 istekohaga.
The construction of passenger and freight facilities, aprons and modernisation of taxiways had to be carried out in order to further develop civil flight operations.
Notar Jürgen Scherzeri 24. novembri 2000. aasta notariaalakt (nr 268/2000).
Hence, the constructed infrastructure was necessary for the airport in order to serve the connectivity and the development of the region.
Aktsionäride koosoleku 3. mai 2000. aasta resolutsioon.
Also, the infrastructure project was undertaken only to the extent it was necessary to attain the goals set: while the infrastructure was built for a maximum passenger traffic of around 4 to 5 million passengers and 500000 tonnes of freight, the traffic statistics displayed in Tables 1 and 2 show that the passenger traffic steadily increased until 2007 to reach a record of 4 million passengers (following by a decline to 2,7 million in 2013 for the reasons set out in recital 532) and that the freight volume increased to more than 500000 tonnes of freight in 2011.
Fraporti valduskomitee on järelevalvenõukogu moodustatud komitee, mis jälgib Fraporti valduses olevate ettevõtete majandustegevust.
This means that the expected traffic demand largely corresponded to the actual demand and that the investments were not disproportionately large.
Ehk teisisõnu oli laenukapitali suhe omakapitali 96 %.
While it is important to avoid that the investment constitutes a duplication of an existing unprofitable infrastructure, that is not the case here.
Rheinland-Pfalzi liidumaa valdusettevõtjate 1999., 2001., 2003. ja 2004. aasta aruanded.
As already explained in recitals 516 to 523, there are no other airports within 100 kilometres distance and 60 minutes travelling time, and even if a wider catchment area was to be considered there are no duplications effects.
Aastasele teenindustasule, mida Ryanair pidi maksma kuni kuue lennu korral päevas, oli kehtestatud ülemmäär […] eurot.
The closest airport is Frankfurt Main airport, which Frankfurt Hahn airport was intended to decongest.
Toimik nr V/21-1011/1.
In the light of those considerations, the Commission considers that this compatibility condition is met.
lisa alusel sai FFHG lisaks […] % komisjonitasu igalt FFHG kassades müüdud (sularaha eest või krediitkaardiga) või väljastatud piletilt, […] % komisjonitasu FFHG kogutud lisatasudelt ülemäärase pagasi eest, […] eurot iga Ryanairi töödeldud ettemakstud pileti eest ja […] % komisjonitasu igalt FFHG kaudu toimunud auto rentimiselt.
Germany submitted that before the decision to further develop the airport infrastructure was taken, traffic forecast studies were conducted by external experts in order to identify the traffic potential for Frankfurt Hahn airport.
Seda on näha ka Rheinland-Pfalzi liidumaa nimel PricewaterhouseCoopersi esitatud turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja kriteeriumi täitmist käsitleva hinnangu punktist 68.
The information submitted shows that at that time the external experts forecasted significant growth from 0,3 million passengers in 2000 to up to 3,8 million passengers by 2010 (see Figures 2, 3 and 4).
Toimik nr V/20-1011/1.
With regard to freight development, the experts projected a development from 151000 tonnes in 2001 to up to 386000 tonnes in 2010 (see Figure 5), with the growth in the freight business between 2006 and 2010 coming from the freight flights diverted from Frankfurt Main airport due to curfew.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsus) (EKL 2002, lk I-4397, punktid 51 jj).
However, those projections could only be fulfilled if the investments were undertaken to the planned extent.
Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsuse punkt 51 jj.
The Commission notes that those traffic forecasts (see recital 531) were confirmed by the actual traffic development at Frankfurt Hahn airport (see Tables 1 and 2).
Vt riigiabi tunnuseid avaliku sektori maa- ja hoonemüügitehingutes käsitleva komisjoni teatise II jao punkt 2.
In 2007 Frankfurt Hahn airport served around 4 million passengers.
2005. aasta lennundussuuniste punkt 33.
Following a period of significant growth, air traffic in Germany and the Union in recent years has been negatively affected by the economic and financial crisis in 2008/09, which resulted in a decrease in passenger air transport in Germany in 2009.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-128/98: Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 2000, lk II-3929), mida on kinnitatud otsusega kohtuasjas C-82/01 P: Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 2002, lk I-9297).
The passenger development at Frankfurt Hahn airport was further impacted by the introduction of an air passenger tax in Germany in 2011.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-443/08 ja T-455/08: Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG ja Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH vs. Euroopa Komisjon (edaspidi „Leipzig/Halle kohtuotsus“) (EKL 2011, lk II-1311, eelkõige punktid 93–94), mida kinnitab otsus kohtuasjas C-288/11 P: Mitteldeutsche Flughafen ja Flughafen Leipzig/Halle vs. Euroopa Komisjon (2012, veel avaldamata).
Currently Frankfurt Hahn airport serves around 2,7 million passengers p.a.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-458/03: Stadtwerke Brixen AG (EKL 2005, lk I-08585, punkt 67).
With regard to freight, Frankfurt Hahn airport handled 565000 tonnes of freight in 2011.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-340/04: Carbotermo (EKL 2006, lk I-04137, punkt 36 jj).
Due to the bankruptcy of one of its clients, the airport processed only 447000 tonnes in 2013.
Nõukogu 23. juuli 1992. aasta määrus (EMÜ) nr 2408/92 ühenduse lennuettevõtjate juurdepääsu kohta ühendusesisestele lennuliinidele (ELT L 240, 24.8.1992, lk 8).
In the light of those considerations, it can therefore be concluded that Frankfurt Hahn airport is already using most of its capacity and that the medium-term prospects for the use of the capacity were satisfactory.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-379/98: Preussen-Elektra (EKL 2001, lk I-02099, punkt 58).
All potential users of the infrastructure have access to the airport on equal and non-discriminatory terms.
Gemeinschaftsaufgabe „Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur (GRW) Gesetz“, 6. oktoober 1969 (BGBl.
Indeed, the schedule of airport charges applicable at Frankfurt Hahn airport is publicly available and open to all potential and current users of the airport in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner.
I S. 1861), viimati muudetud 7. septembri 2007. aasta akti artikliga 8 (BGBl.
Any differences in airport charges actually paid for the use of the infrastructure were based on commercially justified differentiation [132].
I, lk 2,246).
Hence, the Commission considers that this condition is satisfied.
Flughafen Frankfurt Hahn – Regionaloekonomische Effekte, ZFL Studie, märts 2007.
According to point 39 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines the category of an airport can provide an indication of the extent to which airports are competing with one another and therefore also the extent to which public funding granted to an airport may distort competition.
Saksamaa 2014. aasta septembris esitatud andmed.
Within the standard catchment area of Frankfurt Hahn airport (1 hour travelling time by car or 100 kilometres distance) there are no other commercially exploited airports.
Oxera, „How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test? – Practical application,“ ( „Kuidas tuleks kasumlikkuse analüüsis käsitleda lennujaamateenuste lepinguid osana turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja põhimõtet käsitlevast kontrollist? – Praktiline kohaldamine“), 31. jaanuar 2014, koostatud Ryanairi jaoks.
Even if one were to extend the catchment area, the Commission considers that the aid does not create undue negative effects on competition and trade between the Member States.
Oxera selgitas, et 1999. ja 2004. aasta kohta esitatud hinnanguid on kohandatud, et kajastada 1999. aasta Ryanairi lepingu alguskuupäeva 1999. aasta aprillis ja lõppkuupäeva 2004. aasta märtsis.
As far as Frankfurt Main airport (the closest airport at around 115 kilometres distance and 1 hour 15 minutes travelling time) is concerned, the investments at Frankfurt Hahn airport did not result in negative substitution effects.
Oxera selgitas, et amortisatsiooni mõõdeti nüüdispuhasväärtuse suhtes neutraalsel viisil.
In fact, before getting involved in Frankfurt Hahn airport, Fraport was already the operator of Frankfurt Main airport, but was nevertheless investing into Frankfurt Hahn airport with a view to de-congesting Frankfurt Main airport as a future capacity overload was foreseeable for that hub.
Oxera sõnul tagati selle lähenemisviisiga, et amortisatsiooni diskonteeritud nüüdisväärtus vara kasutusaja jooksul on võrdne kapitalikulude esialgse summaga.
In particular, the ban on night flights at Frankfurt Main airport was one of the main factors to be taken into consideration as Frankfurt Hahn airport had a 24 hour operating license.
Oxera väitis, et andmed on esitatud nominaalväärtustena.
Even though Frankfurt Hahn experienced significant growth in the period from 2000 until 2007 (Tables 1 and 2) shows that in comparison to Frankfurt Main the traffic share remained very limited.
Oxera selgitas, et 2002. ja 2017. aasta kohta esitatud hinnanguid on kohandatud, et kajastada 2002. aasta Ryanairi lepingu alguskuupäeva 2002. aasta veebruaris ja lõppkuupäeva 2017. aasta veebruaris.
From 2000 to 2003 Frankfurt Main airport experienced steady passenger growth from 48 million in 2000 to 54,2 million in 2007.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-228/99 ja T-233/99: Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale ja Nordrhein-Westfaleni liidumaa vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 2003, lk II-00435, punkt 314).
Due to the economic crisis, Frankfurt Main experienced a slight decrease to 50,9 million in 2009, followed by a rapid increase to 58 million.
Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsuse punktid 33–34.
With regard to the freight activities, Frankfurt Main airport experienced steady growth from 1,6 million to 2,2 million tonnes in 2013.
Komisjoni 16. novembri 2006. aasta direktiiv 2006/111/EÜ liikmesriikide ja riigi osalusega äriühingute vaheliste finantssuhete läbipaistvuse ning teatavate ettevõtjate finantsläbipaistvuse kohta (ELT L 318, 17.11.2006, lk 17).
As for other airports, the Commission has already explained that the investments at Frankfurt Hahn airport had no significant impact on competition and trade between the Member States [133].
Otsus kohtuasjas T-196/04: Ryanair Ltd vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (edaspidi „Charleroi' kohtuotsus“) (EKL 2008, lk II-3643).
That also applies to Zweibrücken airport, given that it is rather the latter that constitutes an unnecessary duplication of infrastructure (and would thus be responsible for any distortive effect on competition).
2005. aasta turunduslepingut ei käsitletud ka 2011. aasta menetluse algatamise otsuses.
In addition, contrary to Frankfurt Main and Luxembourg airports Frankfurt Hahn airport is not served by a train connection.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-128/98: Aéroports de Paris vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 2000, lk II-3929, mida kinnitab Euroopa Kohtu otsus kohtuasjas C-82/01 P (EKL 2002, lk I-9297, punkt 75 ja seal esitatud viited).
Overall, no substitution effect on rail transport can be expected.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-455/08: Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH ja Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG vs. Euroopa Komisjon (EKL 2011, lk I-1311, eelkõige punktid 105 ja 106).
In view of the considerations in recitals 536 to 541, the Commission considers that any undue negative effects on competition and trade between Member States are limited to the minimum.
Vt eeskätt komisjoni 17. juuni 2008. aasta otsus seoses juhtumiga C-29/08 – Frankfurt Hahni lennujaam – väidetav riigiabi lennujaamale ja leping Ryanairiga (ELT C 12, 17.1.2009, lk 6, punktid 204–208); komisjoni 21. märtsi 2012. aasta otsus seoses juhtumiga C 76/2002 – Charleroi' lennujaam – väidetav riigiabi lennujaamale ja Ryanairile (ELT C 248, 17.8.2012, lk 1).
The Commission must establish whether the State aid granted to Frankfurt Hahn Airport has changed the behaviour of the beneficiary in such a way that it engaged in activity contributing to the achievement of the objective of common interest that (i) it would not have carried out without the aid, or (ii) it would have carried out in a more restricted or different manner.
Määruse (EÜ) nr 659/1999 artikli 1 punktis d on sätestatud, et abikava on „mis tahes õigusakt, mille alusel võidakse ilma edasiste rakendusmeetmeteta anda individuaalset abi õigusaktis üldiselt ja abstraktselt määratletud ettevõtjatele, ja mis tahes õigusakt, mille alusel võidakse anda eriprojektiga sidumata abi ühele või mitmele ettevõtjale määramata ajaks ja/või määramata ulatuses“.
In addition, the aid is considered to be proportionate only if the same result could not be reached with less aid and less distortion.
FFHG olukorda käsitleva 2002. aasta aruande lehekülg 5.
That means that the amount and intensity of the aid must be limited to the minimum needed for the aided activity to take place.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsus) (EKL 2002, lk I-4397).
According to the information submitted by Germany, without the aid the investment could not have been realised.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-267/08 ja T-279/08: Nord-Pas-de-Calais (2011, veel avaldamata, punkt 108).
Germany submitted that the aid was necessary as it compensated only the costs of financing and a lower amount would have led to lower levels of investment.
Vt näiteks komisjoni otsus seoses riigiabiga nr C 41/2005 – Ungari luhtunud kulud (ELT C 324, 21.12.2005, lk 12, ja seal esitatud viited).
Indeed, according to the financial results summarised in Tables 3 and 4 the airport is still loss-making and not able to finance its investment costs.
Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsuse punktid 52 ja 57.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the aid was necessary to make investments in order to decongest the airport infrastructure and to meet the current requirements for modern airport infrastructure.
45,24 % Fraporti aktsiatest kuulus Hesseni liidumaale, 28,89 % ettevõtjale Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main Holding GmbH (mis kuulus 100 % Maini-äärse Frankfurti omavalitsusele) ja 25,87 % Saksamaa Liitvabariigile.
Without the aid, Frankfurt Hahn airport would not have been able to meet the expected demand of airlines, passengers and freight forwarders and the level of the economic activity of the airport would have been reduced.
Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsuse punktid 55–56.
It should also be noted that the public support was granted in a period when FFHG realised very significant investments into the infrastructure (more than EUR 220 million in 2001-2012).
Otsus kohtuasjas T-442/03: SIC – Sociedade Independente de Comunicação vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 2008, lk II-01161, punkt 100).
It follows that the investment aid covers only a fraction of the overall investment costs.
§ 11 I No. 2 lit. c Strafgesetzbuch.
The Commission therefore considers that the aid measure at stake had an incentive effect, that the amount of aid was limited to the minimum necessary for the aided activity to take place, and was thus proportionate.
Vt Fraporti aastate 2001–2006 finantsaruanded (Geschäftsbericht), mis on avaldatud aadressil http://www.fraport.de/de/investor-relations/termine-und-publikationen/publikationen.html Vt eelkõige Geschäftsbericht 2001, lk 46; Geschäftsbericht 2002, lk 66; Geschäftsbericht 2003, lk 54; Geschäftsbericht 2004, lk 80; Geschäftsbericht 2005, lk 64; Geschäftsbericht 2006, lk 72.
On the basis of the above, the Commission concludes that the investment aid granted to Frankfurt Hahn airport is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty as it complies with the compatibility conditions laid down in point 61 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
Fraporti ja Rheinland-Pfalzi liidumaa 31. augusti 1999. aasta põhileping.
COMPATIBILITY OF OPERATING AID PURSUANT TO THE 2014 AVIATION GUIDELINES
Järelevalvenõukogu andis loa sõlmida põhileping oma 1. oktoobri 1999. aasta koosolekul.
Section 5.1 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines sets out the criteria that the Commission will apply in assessing the compatibility of operating aid with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Fraporti ja Rheinland-Pfalzi liidumaa 31. augusti 1999. aasta põhilepingu punktid 4 ja 5.
According to point 172 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, the Commission will apply those criteria to all cases concerning operating aid, including pending notifications and unlawful non-notified aid cases.
FFHG 29. novembri 2001. aasta põhikirja paragrahv 13 Verfügung über Geschäftsanteile (Aktsiatehingud).
According to point 137 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, unlawful operating aid granted before the date of the publication of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines may be declared compatible with the internal market to the full extent of uncovered operating costs provided that the following cumulative conditions are met:
Järelevalvenõukogu omandamisega tegeleva komitee 30. mai 2001. aasta koosoleku protokoll.
contribution to a well-defined objective of common interest: that condition is fulfilled, inter alia, if the aid increases the mobility of citizens of the Union and connectivity of the regions or facilitates regional development [134];
Juhatusele (Vorstandsvorlage) esitatud 14. mai 2001. aasta dokumendid FFHG majandusliku arengu kohta; vt ka järelevalvenõukogu omandamisega tegeleva komitee 30. mai 2001. aasta koosoleku protokoll; vt ka BCG 14. veebruaril 2001 koostatud FFHG väljavaadete analüüsi lehekülg 10.
need for State intervention: the aid must be targeted towards situations where such aid can bring about a material improvement that the market itself cannot deliver [135];
Fraporti järelevalvenõukogule esitatud resolutsiooni ettepanek, 23. november 2001.
existence of incentive effect: that condition is fulfilled if it is likely that, in the absence of operating aid, and taking into account the possible presence of investment aid and the level of traffic, the level of economic activity of the airport concerned would be significantly reduced [136];
Otsus kohtuasjas C-39/94: Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) jt vs. La Poste jt (EKL 1996, lk I-3547, punkt 60) ning otsus kohtuasjas C-342/96: Hispaania Kuningriik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 1999, lk I-2459, punkt 41).
proportionality of the aid amount (aid limited to the minimum necessary): in order to be proportionate, operating aid to airports must be limited to the minimum necessary for the aided activity to take place [137];
Otsus kohtuasjas 173/73: Itaalia Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 1974, lk 709, punkt 13).
avoidance of undue negative effects on competition and trade [138].
Otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsuse Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsus) (EKL 2002, lk I-4397, punkt 69).
According to Section 5.1.2(a) of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, in order to give airports time to adjust to new market realities and to avoid any disruptions in the air traffic and connectivity of the regions, operating aid to airports will be considered to contribute to the achievement of an objective of common interest, if it: (i) increases the mobility of Union citizens and connectivity of regions by establishing access points for intra-Union flights; (ii) combats air traffic congestion at major Union hub airports; or (iii) facilitates regional development.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-305/89: Itaalia Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (ALFA Romeo kohtuotsus) (EKL 1991, lk I-1603, punkt 23); otsus kohtuasjas T-296/97: Alitalia vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 2000, lk II-03871, punkt 84).
In the light of the considerations in recitals 512 to 519, the Commission considers that the continued operation of Frankfurt-Hahn airport increased the mobility of Union citizens and connectivity of regions by establishing an access point for intra-Union flights in the Hunsrück region.
Otsus kohtuasjas 40/85: Belgia Kuningriik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 1986, lk I-2321).
In addition, the continued operation of the airport facilitated the regional development of the Hunsrück region and the creation of new jobs.
Stardust Marine'i kohtuotsuse punkt 71.
Moreover, the operation and development of Frankfurt-Hahn airport also served to decongest Frankfurt Main airport.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-124/10 P: Euroopa Komisjon vs. Électricité de France (2012, veel avaldamata, punkt 85).
The Commission therefore concludes that the measure at stake meets a clearly defined objective of common interest.
Inerplan oli konsultant, kelle Fraport palkas analüüsima Frankfurt Hahni liikluspotentsiaali.
According to Section 5.1.2(b) of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, in order to assess whether State aid is effective in achieving an objective of common interest, it is necessary to identify the problem to be addressed.
FFHG järelevalvenõukogu omandamisega tegeleva komitee 30. mai 2001. aasta koosoleku protokoll.
In that respect, any State aid to an airport must be targeted towards a situation where aid can bring about a material improvement that the market cannot deliver itself.
BCG koostatud 14. veebruari 2001. aasta kasumlikkuse hinnang.