natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In contrast, the part of the annual capital injections that was used to cover annual operating losses [75] of Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd, net of costs included in the EBITDA that are considered to fall within a public policy remit as established in recitals 102 - 107, constitutes operating aid in favour of the airport operator.
Eelkõige ei ole lennujaama käitaja prognoositava kasumlikkusega seotud ebaselguse (vt abi olemasolu käsitlev punkt) tõttu võimalik tagada, et abi antakse üleminekuperioodil ja et see on vähenev.
State aid for financing airport infrastructure is compatible with Article 107(3)(c) TFEU if it complies with the conditions laid down in paragraph 61 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines:
Seepärast leiab komisjon, et Gdynia ja Kosakowo poolt äriühingule Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd antud tegevusabi ei ole kokkusobiv siseturuga, kuivõrd sellega püütakse tagada sellise lennujaama käitamine, mis on olemas vaid tänu siseturuga kokkusobimatule investeerimisabile ja mis (nagu investeerimisabigi) toob lihtsalt kaasa lennujaama taristu dubleerimise.
construction and operation of the infrastructure meets a clearly defined objective of common interest (regional development, accessibility, etc.)
Järeldus abi kokkusobivuse kohta
the infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set;
Seega teeb komisjon järelduse, et äriühingule Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd antud riigiabi on siseturuga kokkusobimatu.
the infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
Komisjon ei ole tuvastanud ühtki teist siseturuga kokkusobivust käsitlevat sätet, mille alusel saaks kõnealust abi lugeda aluslepinguga kokkusobivaks.
all potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner;
Samuti ei ole Poola viidanud ühelegi siseturuga kokkusobivust käsitlevale sättele ega esitanud mõjuvaid argumente, mis võimaldaksid komisjonil lugeda kõnealust abi siseturuga kokkusobivaks.
the development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the Union interest.
Investeerimis- ja tegevusabi, mida Poola on andnud või kavatseb anda äriühingule Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd, on siseturuga kokkusobimatu.
In addition, to be compatible with the internal market, State aid to airports, like any other State aid measure, should have an incentive effect and be necessary and proportional to the legitimate objective pursued.
Poola on riigiabi andnud ebaseaduslikult, rikkudes Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõiget 3.
Poland is of the opinion that the public financing of the conversion project at Gdynia airfield complies with all the criteria for investment aid in the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
SISSENÕUDMINE
Construction and operation of the infrastructure meets a clearly defined objective of common interest (regional development, accessibility, etc.)
Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu ja Euroopa Kohtu väljakujunenud praktika kohaselt võib komisjon juhul, kui ta leiab, et abi ei ole siseturuga kokkusobiv, otsustada, et liikmesriik peab sellise abi andmise lõpetama või seda muutma [76].
The Commission notes that Pomerania is already efficiently served by Gdańsk airport, which is only about 25 km away from the planned new airport.
Samuti on Euroopa Kohus korduvalt sedastanud, et riigi kohustus tühistada abi, mida komisjon peab siseturuga kokkusobimatuks, on ette nähtud selleks, et taastada varasem olukord [77].
Gdańsk airport is located next to the Tricity ring road, which is part of the S6 express road that bypasses Gdynia, Sopot and Gdańsk and provides the large majority of Pomerania's inhabitants with easy access to the airport.
Sellega seoses on Euroopa Kohus sedastanud, et kõnealune eesmärk on saavutatud, kui abisaaja on ebaseadusliku abina saadud summad tagasi maksnud ja seega loobunud eelistest, mis tal turul konkurentide ees olid, ja on taastatud abi andmisele eelnenud olukord [78].
Even for Gdynia's inhabitants, the construction of a new airport would not in itself lead to a substantial improvement in connectivity, since both Gdynia and Gdańsk airports are about 20-25 minutes by car from the centre of Gdynia.
Selle kohtupraktika põhjal sätestati nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 659/99 [79] artiklis 14: „Kui ebaseadusliku abi korral tehakse negatiivne otsus, nõuab komisjon, et kõnealune liikmesriik peab võtma kõik vajalikud meetmed, et abisaajalt abi tagasi saada”.
The Commission also observes that the Tricity Metropolitan Rail link currently being built with co-financing from the Union's structural funds will enable residents of both Gdańsk and Gdynia to travel directly from the centre of their town to Gdańsk airport in about 25 minutes.
Seepärast tuleb eespool nimetatud riigiabi Poola ametiasutustele juba välja makstud ulatuses tagastada.
The Tricity Metropolitan Rail will also provide people in other areas of Pomerania with direct or indirect rail links to Gdańsk airport.
Komisjon tuletab meelde väljakujunenud kohtupraktikas kinnitatut, et asjaolu, et ettevõtjad on raskustes või pankrotis, ei mõjuta liikmesriigi kohustust abi sisse nõuda [80].
The Commission also observes that Gdańsk airport currently has a capacity of 5 million passengers a year, whereas actual passenger traffic in 2010 to 2013 was as follows: 2010 — 2,2 million, 2011 — 2,5 million, 2012 — 2,9 million, 2013 — 2,8 million.
Nendel juhtudel võib osutuda võimalikuks taastada endine olukord ja kõrvaldada ebaseaduslikult makstud abi tulemusena tekkinud konkurentsi moonutamine põhimõtteliselt sellise abi tagasimaksmisega seotud kohustuse kandmisega võlanimekirja [81].
The Commission also notes that Gdańsk airport is currently being expanded to handle 7 million passengers a year.
Asjaomase abi tagastamisega seonduva nõude kandmine võlanimekirja võimaldab lugeda abi tagasinõudmise kohustuse täidetuks üksnes siis, kui olukorras, kus riigi ametiasutustel ei olnud võimalik tagasi nõuda kogu abisummat, päädib pankrotimenetlus ebaseaduslikku abi saanud ettevõtja likvideerimisega, st tema tegevuse lõpliku lõpetamisega [82],
This investment is to be completed in 2015.
ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE.
In addition, according to the traffic forecast provided by Poland for Pomerania and used to prepare the 2012 MEIP study, total demand in the region will be […] million passengers a year […].
Artikkel 1
Table 9
Otsus 2014/883/EL tühistatakse.
Traffic projections for Pomerania (in millions)
Artikkel 2
The Commission also observes that, according to the information provided by Poland, the masterplan for Gdańsk airport provides for further expansion of the airport to handle more than 10 million passengers a year.
28. augustist 2007 kuni 17. juunini 2013 äriühingusse Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd tehtud kapitalisüstid kujutavad endast riigiabi, mida Poola andis ebaseaduslikult, rikkudes Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 lõiget 3, ning mis on kokkusobimatu siseturuga, välja arvatud niivõrd, kuivõrd need kapitalisüstid kulutati selliseks tegevuseks vajalikele investeeringutele, mida tuleb vastavalt otsusele C(2013) 4045 final lugeda seotuks avalike huvidega.
Depending on the development of traffic, a decision to expand the capacity of the Gdańsk airport above 7 million may therefore be taken in the future.
Kapitalisüstid, mida Poola kavatseb teha äriühingusse Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd pärast 17. juunit 2013 Gdynia-Kosakowo sõjaväelennuvälja muutmiseks tsiviillennuväljaks, kujutavad endast riigiabi, mis on siseturuga kokkusobimatu.
According to Poland, the updated forecast (prepared in March 2013) shows that demand in the catchment area is expected to be higher than the traffic projections in 2012.
Seega ei tohi seda riigiabi anda.
According to the modified projections, demand in the catchment area will be about 9 million passengers in 2030.
Artikkel 3
However, even this forecast shows that Gdańsk airport alone would be sufficient, without further investment, to meet demand in the region until at least 2025 (on the basis of the adjusted traffic forecasts described in recital 63).
Poola nõuab artikli 2 lõikes 1 osutatud abi abisaajalt sisse.
Furthermore, according to the information provided by Poland, current runway capacity at Gdańsk airport is 40-44 operations an hour, while use is currently averaging 4,7 operations an hour.
Tagasinõutavatelt summadelt arvestatakse intressi alates kuupäevast, mil need anti abisaaja käsutusse, kuni nende tegeliku sissenõudmiseni.
On the basis of information provided by Poland (see recitals 209 to 213 above) the Commission observes that Gdańsk airport will be used at only about 50–60 % of its capacity in the coming years.
Intressi arvutatakse liitintressina kooskõlas komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 794/2004 V peatükiga [83].
As a result, even with fast growth in passenger numbers in Pomerania, Gdańsk airport will be able to meet demand from airlines and passengers for a long time.
Poola tühistab alates käesoleva otsuse teatavakstegemisest kõik artikli 2 lõikes 2 osutatud abi veel tegemata maksed.
The Commission further observes that Gdańsk airport offers more than 40 national and international destinations (both point-to-point connections and connections to hub such as Frankfurt, Munich, Warsaw and Copenhagen).
Artikkel 4
As mentioned in recital 78, Poland argues, on the one hand, that the scope for expanding capacity at Gdańsk airport is limited for planning and environmental reasons.
Artikli 2 lõikes 1 osutatud abi ja artikli 3 lõikes 2 osutatud intress nõutakse tagasi viivitamata ja tõhusalt.
On the other hand, it also argues that there are no limits on the scope for expanding capacity at Gdańsk airport.
Poola tagab käesoleva otsuse rakendamise nelja kuu jooksul alates otsuse teatavakstegemise kuupäevast.
As the arguments regarding the capacity expansion restrictions are contradictory and are not substantiated anyway, the Commission considers that it cannot base its assessment on them.
Artikkel 5
The Commission also notes that the business model for Gdynia airport suggests that it would compete for passengers with Gdańsk airport in the LCC, charter and general aviation markets.
käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks juba võetud ja kavandatavate meetmete üksikasjalik kirjeldus;
Moreover, the creation of a new airport to serve as a back-up, emergency airport cannot justify the scale of investment at Gdynia airport.
dokumendid, mis kinnitavad, et abisaajale on antud korraldus abi tagasi maksta.
As mentioned in recital 77, Poland refers to the ‘Regional transport development strategy in Pomorskie province for 2007 - 2020’ that according to Poland recognised a need to build a hub of closely collaborating airports serving Pomerania.
Poola teavitab komisjoni käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks võetud riiklike meetmete rakendamisest, kuni artikli 2 lõikes 1 osutatud abi ja artikli 3 lõikes 2 nimetatud intress on täielikult tagasi makstud.
The Commission notes however that the ‘Regional transport development strategy in Pomorskie province for 2007-2020’ presents only the possible strategic directions in which the transport in the region can or should be developed.
Poola esitab komisjoni taotluse korral viivitamata teabe käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks juba võetud ja kavandatavate meetmete kohta.
The conclusions on Gdynia airport are of a very general nature.
Ta esitab ka üksikasjaliku teabe abisaajalt juba sisse nõutud abisummade ja intressi kohta.
Moreover, the document does not set out any implementing steps ensuring the use of Gdynia airport for civil aviation.
Artikkel 6
Nor does it impose any obligations concerning this objective.
Käesolev otsus on adresseeritud Poola Vabariigile.
On the contrary, the document underlines that ‘Plans for the development of commercial activities at airports Gdynia Kosakowo or Slupsk Redzikowo should primarily be directed at capacity that is economically viable and satisfies existing demand and the possibility of handling freight where it is profitable.’
Brüssel, 26. veebruar 2015
Similarly, the letter of intent signed on 29 April 2005 by the Ministry of National Defence, the Ministry of Transport, Gdańsk airport and various regional authorities (mentioned in recital 21 of this Decision) is of a very general character, expressing only the intention to introduce civil aviation to the military airfield in Kosakowo.
Komisjoni nimel
The Commission also notes that following the adoption of Decision 2014/883/EU, the governor of Pomorskie province together with the mayors of Gdańsk and Sopot (two out of three biggest cities in the region and shareholders in Gdańsk airport) made a written statement.
Margrethe Vestager
In this statement, they declared that they had not signed the letter of 29 April 2005 with the intention of starting the construction of a new airport in Gdynia.
ELT C 243, 23.8.2013, lk 25.
According to the statement, the letter of intent was signed only to safeguard the infrastructure of the existing military airfield for the future cooperation of this military airfield with Gdańsk airport.
Alates 1. detsembrist 2009 muutusid EÜ asutamislepingu artiklid 87 ja 88 vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu („ELi toimimise leping”) artikliteks 107 ja 108.
In this context, Gdynia airport could serve GA traffic only.
Sätted on sisult identsed.
The local authorities also underlined that the decision to set up Gdynia airport was an independent decision of Gdynia and Kosakowo, which were repeatedly informed that this investment had no economic justification.
Käesolevas otsuses tuleb viiteid Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklitele 107 ja 108 käsitada vajaduse korral vastavalt viidetena EÜ asutamislepingu artiklitele 87 ja 88.
In a letter dated 6 August 2013 Poland announced that the shareholders in Gdańsk airport (including Gdynia) had decided on 30 July 2013 (i.e. after the opening of formal investigation procedure) to set up a working group to analyse the possible scenarios for cooperation of Gdynia and Gdańsk airports.
Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepinguga tehti teatavaid terminimuudatusi: „ühendus” asendati „liiduga” ja „ühisturg” „siseturuga”.
In a letter of 30 October 2013 (provided to the Commission on 4 November 2013), the Mayor of Gdynia reported that the working group had recommended to Gdańsk airport's shareholders that the two Pomeranian airports be merged (by Gdańsk airport taking over Gdynia airport).
Käesolevas otsuses kasutatakse läbivalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu termineid.
The Mayor also reported that the details of such a merger were still being analysed.
Poolale teatatud otsus juhtumi C(2013) 4045 final kohta avaldati koos kokkuvõttega ELT C 243, 23.8.2013, lk 25.
In the Commission's view, the setting-up of the working group was dictated solely by the opening of the formal investigation procedure and cannot be seen as proof of the implementation of a regional transport strategy.
Komisjoni otsus 2014/883/EL, 11. veebruar 2014, meetme SA.35388 (13/C) (ex 13/NN ja ex 12/N) (Poola) kohta, millega muudetakse Gdynia-Kosakowo lennujaama (ELT L 357, 12.12.2014, lk 51).
It should also be underlined that the Commission was not informed about any earlier or later actions concerning cooperation between the two Pomeranian airports.
Hagiavaldused registreeriti vastavalt kohtuasjadena T-215/14 ja T-217/14.
The Commission also notes that cooperation between Gdynia airport with Gdańsk airport in the framework of a hub would not eliminate a duplication of infrastructure with no basis in actual transport needs.
Üldkohtu presidendi määrus kohtuasjas T-215/14: R Gmina Miasto Gdynia ja Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo vs. komisjon (EU:T:2014:733); Üldkohtu presidendi määrus kohtuasjas T-217/14 R: Gmina Kosakowo vs. komisjon (avaldamata).
In the light of the above, the Commission considers that the investment in Gdynia airport will lead simply to the duplication of infrastructure in the region, which does not meet a clearly defined objective of common interest.
Konkurentsi- ja tarbijakaitseameti presidendi 30. juuni 2014. aasta ja 8. jaanuari 2015. aasta kiri.
The infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set
Vastavalt valitud teekonnale on Gdynia ja Gdański lennujaama vahemaa autoga sõites 26–29 kilomeetrit; allikas: Google'i kaardid, Bingi kaardid.
As stated in recitals 206 to 226, the Commission considers that the catchment area of Gdynia airport is and will continue to be efficiently served by Gdańsk airport.
Gdański lennujaam kuulub avaliku sektori asutuste asutatud äriühingule Gdansk Lech Walesa Airport Ltd, mis seda ka käitab.
In addition, both airports would pursue a similar business model and focus mainly on LCCs and charter flights.
Äriühingu aktsiakapital jaguneb järgmiselt: Gdański linn (32 %), Pomorze vojevoodkond (32 %), riigiettevõte Poola Lennujaamad (31 %), Sopoti linn (3 %) ja Gdynia linn (2 %).
In the absence of a clearly defined objective of common interest the Commission considers that the infrastructure cannot be considered to be necessary and proportional to an objective of common interest (see also recital 226).
Gdański Lech Wałęsa lennujaam (edaspidi „Gdański lennujaam”) on Poola suuruselt kolmas lennujaam.
The infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
2012. aastal läbis selle 2,9 miljonit reisijat (2,7 miljonit regulaarlendudel ja 0,2 miljonit tellimuslendudel).
As stated in point (i), Gdynia airport is only about 25 km away from the existing Gdańsk airport, and the two airports have the same catchment area and a similar business model.
Gdański lennujaamast pakuvad regulaarlennuteenuseid järgmised kaheksa lennuettevõtjat (jaanuar 2014): Wizzair (22 sihtkohta), Ryanair (7 sihtkohta), Eurolot (4 sihtkohta), LOT (2 sihtkohta), Lufthansa (2 sihtkohta), SAS (2 sihtkohta), Air Berlin (1 sihtkoht), Norwegian (1 sihtkoht).
Gdańsk airport is currently used at less than 60 % of its capacity.
Alates uue terminali avamisest mais 2012 suudab Gdański lennujaam teenindada viit miljonit reisijat aastas.
Taking into account the investments currently being carried out, Gdańsk airport is sufficient to handle demand in the region until at least 2025-2028, depending on the forecasts used, and its further expansion is feasible.
Poola esitatud teabe kohaselt suurendab terminali laiendamine (kava järgi 2013–2015) lennujaama teenindamisvõimet seitsme miljoni reisijani.
The Commission also notes that the business plan for Gdynia airport indicates that the airport would generate about [80-90] % of its revenue from serving low-cost and charter carriers.
Investeeringut Gdański lennujaama rahastati ka riigiabist (vt komisjoni 2008. aasta otsus riigiabi N 153/08 kohta – 1,7 miljonit eurot (ELT C 46, 25.2.2009, lk 7); komisjoni 2009. aasta otsus riigiabi N 472/08 kohta, mille tulemusena eraldas Poola Gdański lennujaamale umbes 33 miljonit eurot (ELT C 79, 2.4.2009, lk 2)).
This means that it would be focussing on the markets that represent Gdańsk airport's core business.
Praegune Gdynia-Oksywie sõjaväelennuväli asub Gdynia linna ja Kosakowo omavalitsuse vahelisel piiril.
In this context, the Commission also observes that Poland has provided no proof of possible cooperation between both airports (see also recitals 224 and 225).
Protokollile kirjutasid alla Pomorze vojevoodkonna ametiasutused, Gdański, Gdynia ja Sopoti linn, Kosakowo omavalitsus ning Poola valitsuse (Pomorze vojevoodkonna, kaitseministeeriumi ja transpordiministeeriumi) esindajad ja Gdański lennujaam.
The plans to generate revenues from other aviation and non–aviation activities (production and services) would not be sufficient in themselves to cover the high operating costs related to running Gdynia airport either.
Poola 2008. aasta ametlik väljaanne Dziennik Ustaw nr 144, punkt 901.
The Commission therefore considers that Gdynia airport does not offer satisfactory medium-term prospects for use.
Selle sättega rakendatakse 30. mai 1996. aasta seaduse muudatuse artikli 4h lõiget 2.
All potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner
Käitamiskokkuleppe kohaselt reguleeritakse tegevuskulude jagamist ühe eraldi lepinguga (punkti 5 alapunkt 5) ning investeerimis- ja renoveerimiskulude jagamist teistes eraldi lepingutes, mille mõlemad pooled allkirjastavad enne iga uut investeeringut või renoveerimistööd (punkti 9 alapunkt 7).
Poland confirmed that all potential users would have access to the airport infrastructure on an equal and non-discriminatory basis without any commercially unjustified discrimination.
Selles osas esitatud investeerimiskulud kajastavad Poola 7. septembri 2012. aasta teates ja teatega koos esitatud 2012. aasta uuringus esitatud investeerimisprojekti.
The development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest
Poola arvates hõlmavad avalike huvidega seotud investeeringud tuletõrjujate, tolliametnike, lennujaama turvatöötajate, politseinike ja piirivalvurite jaoks ette nähtud hooneid ja varustust, lennujaama piirdeaeda koos videojälgimisseadmetega jmt.
The Commission notes that Poland has not provided any proof that Gdynia and Gdańsk airports would form a collaborative aviation hub.
Nominaalväärtuses.
Logic suggests that the two airports would actually have to compete for essentially attracting the same passengers.
Nüüdispuhasväärtus näitab, kas konkreetsest projektist saadav tulu ületab kapitali (alternatiiv)kulu.
The Commission further notes that the business plan of Gdynia airport (in which about [80-90] % of revenue is generated by low-cost and charter flights) and the scale of the investment (e.g. a terminal with a capacity of 0,5 million passengers a year that is to be expanded in the future) do not substantiate the claim that Gdynia airport would focus on general aviation traffic and would provide only or mainly services to the general aviation sector.
Projekti loetakse majanduslikult elujõuliseks investeeringuks, kui selle nüüdispuhasväärtus on positiivne.
Taking into account the above and the fact that both airports would focus on LCC and charter flights, the Commission considers that the aid is directed to an airport which would be in direct competition with another airport in the same catchment area, without there being any demand for airport services that could not be met by the existing airport.
Investeeringud, mille tulu on väiksem kui kapitali (alternatiiv)kulu, ei ole majanduslikult elujõulised.
The Commission therefore considers that the aid in question would affect trade to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Kapitali (alternatiiv)kulu iseloomustab diskontomäär.
This conclusion is reinforced by the absence of a common interest objective that the aid is intended to achieve.
Jääkväärtus on kõikide pärast prognoosiperioodi lõppu teenitud rahavoogude nüüdisväärtus.
Based on the data provided by Poland, the Commission considers that the investment costs may be lower than for the construction of other comparable regional airports in Poland.
See eeldab, et projekt ei lõpe kunagi ja kasvab varem määratud kasvumäära kohaselt (praeguse juhtumi puhul põhineb see lennujaama käitaja omakapitali väärtusel esitatud äriplaani viimasel aastal).
This is due mainly to the use of existing infrastructure at the military airfield.
Komisjoni teatis „Ühenduse suunised lennujaamade rahastamise ja piirkondlikest lennujaamadest opereerivate lennuettevõtjate riikliku stardiabi kohta” ( ELT C 312, 9.12.2005, lk 1).
Moreover, Poland argues that without the aid the investment would not be undertaken by the airport operator.
Regionaalabi suunised aastateks 2007–2013 (ELT C 54, 4.3.2006, lk 13).
The Commission further observes that the long period necessary to reach the break-even point for this type of investment means that public financing could be necessary to modify the beneficiary behaviour's in such a way that it proceeds with the investment.
Investeeringu sisemine tasuvuslävi on diskontomäär, mille juures on nüüdispuhasväärtus null.
Moreover, since the expected profitability of the investment project cannot be established (see recital 185) and a market economy investor would not pursue such project, it is indeed likely that the aid is changing the behaviour of the airport operator.
Sisemist tasuvusläve võrreldakse tavaliselt kapitalikuluga.