natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the project consisting in finding new stocks of shellfish, the Commission observed that it is not listed amongst SDVO's missions in its articles of association.
Kaubanduslikel eesmärkidel kasutamiseks kõlblike uute koorikloomavarude otsimine ei kujuta endast tõepoolest vee-elusressursside kvaliteedi ja kvantiteedi pidevat seiret ega ka kalandussektori sotsiaal-majandusliku olukorra jälgimist või valitsuse nõustamist püügikoormuse kontrollimise vallas.
In particular, it does not seem to correspond to the missions described under the heading (c) ‘Improving the management of the living aquatic resources and the control on fisheries’.
Selliste koorikloomavarude olemasolu kindlakstegemisel Belgia mandrilaval ei tundu olevat eesmärk nende varude säilitamine, vaid pigem nende kasutamine.
Indeed, finding new commercially exploitable stocks of shellfish does not correspond to the permanent monitoring of the quality and quantity of the living aquatic resources nor to the monitoring of the socioeconomic situation in the fisheries sector or to advising the government on the control on fishing effort.
Ja veel – seoses projekti „Dagverse vis” reklaamikampaaniaga märkis komisjon, et kiites toodete Belgia päritolu ehk Belgia rannapüügilaevastiku püütud kalu, vastandades neid välisriikide laevade püütud kaladele, on SDVO viidanud toodete geograafilisele päritolule ning on tegutsenud vastuolus oma põhikirjaga ja otsusega N 274/03.
Identifying the presence of commercially exploitable shellfish stocks on the Belgian continental shelf does not seem to aim at the conservation of those stocks but rather at their exploitation.
Komisjon võttis siiski arvesse asjaolu, et projekti „Dagverse vis” kampaaniat on kohandatud ja menetluse algatamise otsuse vastuvõtmise ajal ei viidatud selles enam toodete päritolule.
Finally, on the Dagverse vis promotion campaign, the Commission noted that by praising the Belgian origin of the products (fish caught by the Belgian coastal fleet) in contrast to fish caught by foreign vessels, SDVO has made reference to the geographic origin of the products and has acted in contravention to its articles of association and to Decision N 274/03.
HUVITATUD ISIKUTE MÄRKUSED
Nevertheless, the Commission took note of the fact that the Dagverse vis campaign has been adapted and had already stopped making reference to the geographical origin of the products at the time of the adoption of the opening decision.
Vastusena 2011. aastal tehtud ametliku uurimismenetluse algatamise otsuse avaldamisele Euroopa Liidu Teatajas edastasid riigi ametiasutused komisjonile kava alusel abi saaja tähelepanekud.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
Kaebu se esitaja täiendavaid märkusi ei esitanud.
In response to the publication in the Official Journal of the 2011 decision to open the formal investigation procedure, the Commission received observations from the beneficiary of the scheme, Stichting Duurzame Visserij Ontwikkeling (SDVO), transmitted by national authorities.
SDVO kordas oma seisukohta järgmiselt.
No additional comments were received from the complainant.
Rannakarpide projekt
SDVO reiterated its position, as follows:
Rannakarpide projekt viidi ellu kahes etapis.
The mussels project
Esimeses etapis kasutati rannakarpide kasvatamiseks 13 näidissumpa, mis olid välja töötatud vastavalt Belgia rannikul valitsevatele kliima- ja meretingimustele.
The mussel project was undertaken in two steps.
Teises etapis võeti kasutusele veel 87 sumpa.
In the first phase 13 prototype mussel cages, developed to meet the climatological and nautical requirements of the Belgian coast, were deployed.
Selleks et hinnata, kas projekt on majanduslikult elujõuline, oli vajalik läbida kogu tootmis- ja turustamisprotsess.
In a second phase an additional 87 mussel cages were deployed.
Tuli järgida selle protsessi eri etappe, sealhulgas tegeleda reklaamimisega.
In order to assess whether the project was economically viable, it was necessary to go through the entire production and commercialisation process.
Reklaamikampaania viidi ellu 2007., 2008. ja 2009. aastal ning vastupidiselt komisjoni väidetele oli selle kestus ja ulatus piiratud.
The various steps of the process had effectively to be followed, including the promotional activities.
Reklaamikampaaniat võib pidada üldist huvi pakkuvaks.
The publicity campaign was carried out in 2007, 2008 and 2009 and was, contrary to the arguments of the Commission, of a limited duration and extent.
Kogu aeg oli kindel plaan anda projekt pärast uurimisetappi üle ühistule, mis on avatud kõigile, sealhulgas kaebuse esitajale.
This publicity campaign can be considered of general interest.
SDVO-l oli kavas töötada välja kaubamärk Flanders Queen Mussel projekti konkreetsetel eesmärkidel.
It was always intended that, after the research stage, the project would be transferred to a cooperative opened to all, including the complainant.
Kaubamärk oli mõeldud kasutamiseks vaid korra.
It was the intention of the SDVO to develop the commercial brand Flanders Queen for the specific purposes of the project.
Projekti lõppedes oleks kaubanimi kaotatud.
The commercial brand was to be used only once.
Projekti üleandmisel VSVC-le otsustati aga jätkata rannakarpide müümist sama nime all.
At the end of the project, the commercial name was to disappear.
Projekti arendamise ja reklaamikampaania kulusid ei tuleks käsitada tavalise tootmisprotsessi käigus tekkivate kuludena.
However, upon transfer of the project to the VSVC apparently the decision was made to continue sales of the mussels under this name.
Projektiga mindi kaugemale, kui oleks läinud eraettevõtja, sest kaasnevad kulud oleksid väga suured.
The development of the project and the promotional campaign should not be considered as expenses in the course of a normal production process.
Eraettevõtja ei oleks lihtsalt valmis tegema investeeringuid, mis on vajalikud ainuüksi selleks, et selgitada välja parim rakendatav meetod või teha kindlaks rannakarpide kasvatamiseks sobivad piirkonnad.
The project went further than would have been done by a private undertaking as the associated costs would be very high.
Uute koorikloomavarude otsimine
A private undertaking would simply not be prepared to make the investments needed merely to test out the best method to be applied or merely to identify areas suitable for the cultivation of mussels.
SDVO on seisukohal, et uute koorikloomavarude otsimine jääb tema põhikirja reguleerimisalasse, kuivõrd sellist tegevust tuleb käsitada põhikirja kategoorias c määratletud kontrolli- ja kaitsemeetmena.
Finding of new shellfish stocks
Peale selle moodustab projekt osa kalalaevastiku ümberkorraldamisest, mis on vajalik muu hulgas seetõttu, et avamere tuuleparkide rajamise tulemusel on püügipiirkondi vähemaks jäänud.
SDVO is of the opinion that the finding of new shellfish stocks falls within the scope of its articles of association; as such activity is to be considered as control and conservation measures as defined by category (c) of its articles of association.
Projekti „Dagverse vis” reklaamikampaania
Additionally, the project is part of a conversion of the fishing fleet necessitated, among others, by the loss of fishing grounds as a result of the installation of offshore windmill parks.
SDVO juhtis tähelepanu sellele, et reklaamikampaania oli läbi vaadatud ja algselt kasutatud viited geograafilisele päritolule olid sellest välja jäetud.
Dagverse Vis promotion campaign
HINNANG
SDVO pointed out that promotion campaign had been revised and the reference to geographical origin initially used had been taken out.
Rannakarpide projekt: kaubanime väljatöötamine ja reklaam
ASSESSMENT
Nagu on kirjeldatud eespool, käivitas SDVO oma rannakarpide jaoks ulatusliku reklaamikampaania.
The mussel project: development of a commercial name and publicity
Selle asemel, et edendada üldiselt rannakarpide müüki, keskendutakse reklaammaterjalides konkreetsele kaubamärgile (Flanders Queen Mussel) ja konkreetsele ettevõtjale (SDVO) ning viidatakse korduvalt toodete geograafilisele päritolule (Flandria).
As described above, SDVO launched an extensive publicity campaign for its mussels.
Sellest tulenevalt on SDVO tegutsenud vastuolus oma põhikirjaga (ja seega abikavaga), sest selles on selgelt öeldud, et SDVO tugevdab merepüügi mainet, keskendumata sealjuures ühelegi konkreetsele äriühingule ja viitamata toodete geograafilisele päritolule, ning keelab ära müügiedendusmeetmed, mis põhinevad kaubamärgil ja/või milles viidatakse toodete geograafilisele päritolule.
Instead of organising the promotion of mussels in general, the publicity material is based around a particular commercial brand (Flanders Queen Mussel), targeting a particular undertaking (SDVO) and containing several references to the geographic origin of the products (i.e. Flanders).
Peale selle on SDVO tegutsenud vastuolus otsusega N 274/03, milles on selgelt öeldud, et geograafilised viited ei ole lubatud.
In consequence thereof, SDVO has acted in contradiction with its articles of association (and thus the scheme) as these articles explicitly indicate that SDVO will reinforce the image of the sea fishery, but without targeting any particular firm and without referring to the geographical origin of the products and prohibit promotion measures based around commercial brand and/or referring to the geographic origin of the products.
Komisjon täheldab siiski, et kaubamärk on jäänud kasutusse ka pärast katseprojekti lõppemist.
The Belgian authorities have claimed that the commercial brand was developed only for the pilot project.
Lisaks esitati SDVO veebilehel teavet selle kohta, kust on võimalik saada rannakarpe, mille kaubamärk on Flanders Queen Mussel.
It would only be used once and thereafter be phased out and disappear at the completion of the project.
Komisjon märgib ka seda, et SDVO korraldas 2007., 2008. ja 2009. aastal kaubamärgi Flanders Queen Mussel jaoks mitu müügiedendus- ja reklaamiüritust.
The Commission, however, observes that the commercial brand has remained in use also after the end of the pilot project.
Pealegi toimus osa reklaamitegevusest (2008. ja 2009. aastal) pärast seda, kui katseprojekti raames tellitud uuringud olid juba tulemusi andnud.
As a matter of fact, upon the transfer of the mussel project to the VSVC, the sale of the mussels continued under the name of Flanders Queen Mussel.
Tõepoolest, rannakarpide projekti majanduslikku teostatavust käsitlev lõpparuanne esitati 22. novembril 2007 ja turustamiskava elluviimise hindamise tulemused 21. veebruaril 2008.
The Commission also notes that SDVO organised a number of promotional and publicity events for the Flanders Queen Mussel during 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Seega ei ole isegi lühiajaliste projektide puhul (mida rahastatakse avaliku sektori vahenditest) lubatud seada eesmärgiks konkreetsete kaubamärkide reklaamimine või viidata geograafilistele piirkondadele.
The fact that these activities have taken place repeatedly during a number of years indicates that this was not a campaign that w as small or temporary, and consequently cannot be considered as a limited promotion in time and scope.
Abikavas ja otsuses N 274/03 ei ole ette nähtud ühegi erandi tegemist sellest eeskirjast ja seda ei olekski saanud ette nähta, sest see oleks olnud vastuolus 2001. aasta kalandussuunistega.
Moreover, part of the publicity activities (2008 and 2009) were in fact done after the studies commissioned in the framework of the pilot project had already been delivered.
Lõpetuseks, kaubanime väljatöötamisega tootele, mida hakatakse turul müüma, ja reklaamikampaania käivitamisega kaasnevad kulud, mis tekivad tavapärase tootmisprotsessi käigus ega ole seega kava alusel lubatud.
Indeed, the final report concerning the economic feasibility of the mussel project was delivered on 22 November 2007 and the results of the evaluation of the implementation of the marketing plan were presented on 21 February 2008.
Neil põhjustel leiab komisjon, et töötades välja kaubanime ning käivitades kaubamärgi Flanders Queen Mussel reklaami- ja müügiedenduskampaania, tegutses SDVO väljaspool oma põhikirja ja otsuse N 274/03 reguleerimisala.
In any event, the Commission notes that the prohibition to promote particular brands and make reference in publicity operations to the geographical origin of the products applies to all operations.
Eespool nimetatud põhjustel leiab komisjon, et SDVO on kasutanud kava alusel heaks kiidetud abi seoses kaubanime väljatöötamise ja reklaamitegevusega vääralt.
In addition, the Commission finds it unlikely that such an extensive publicity campaign can reasonably be considered as an action of collective interest in particular as it not to general but targeted on a specific commercial brand.
Projekti esimest osa ei seata kahtluse alla, küll aga tunneb komisjon muret investeeringute pärast, mis tehti pärast katseprojekti lõpetamist.
This is even more so since there was a competing undertaking developing its own brand.
Komisjon leiab, et SDVO ei tegutsenud rannakarpide kasvatamiseks 87 lisasumba soetamisel ja kasutamisel kooskõlas oma põhikirjaga ja otsusega N 274/03.
Finally, the development of a commercial name for a product that will be sold on the market and the launching of a publicity campaign correspond to expenditures which occur in the normal production process and were thus not allowed under the scheme.
Belgia ametiasutused on seisukohal, et 87 lisasumba kasutamine oli ühistele huvidele keskenduv lühiajaline meede.
For these reasons, the Commission considers that by developing the commercial name and launching the publicity and promotion campaign for the Flanders Queen Mussel, SDVO was acting outside the scope of its articles of association and Decision N 274/03.
Peale selle väidavad nad, et sumpade arvu suurendamine oli laiaulatuslikum, kui seda on tegevus, mida võtavad tavaliselt ette eraettevõtjad, sest eraettevõtja lihtsalt ei teeks nii ulatuslikke investeeringuid, teadmata, et tegevusega on võimalik teenida ulatuslikku kasu.
For the above reasons, the Commission considers that SVDO has been misusing the aid authorised under the Scheme as far as the development of a commercial name and publicity is concerned.
Komisjon siiski kahtleb, kas 87 lisasumba soetamist ja kasutamist saab pidada lühiajaliseks meetmeks.
The mussel project: exploitation of 87 additional cages
Esiteks leiab komisjon, et 87 lisasumba soetamine on pikaajaline investeering, mida on keeruline kokku viia lühiajalise meetme põhimõttega.
The Commission is aware of the fact that the mussel project consists of different parts.
Teiseks ei tundu komisjonile, et SDVO oleks võtnud 87 lisasumba soetamist lühiajalise meetmena, mille eesmärk on üksnes võimaldada teha uuring.
As such, the first part of the project is not called into question whereas its concerns relate to the investments made after the completion of the pilot project.
SDVO oli käsitlenud sumpade soetamist investeeringuna ja on otsinud viise, kuidas tagada selle investeeringu tasuvus.
The Commission is of the opinion that by acquiring and exploiting the 87 additional mussel cages, SDVO did not act in conformity with its articles of association and Decision N 274/03.
SDVO-l oli tõepoolest juba 2008. aastal kavas jätkata äritegevust vastloodud tütarettevõtja kaudu.
The Belgian authorities are of the opinion that the exploitation of the additional 87 cages was a short-term operation with a focus on collective interest.
Ka 2009. aastal, mil SDVO ametlikult lõpetas kaubamärgi Flanders Queen Mussel rannakarpide müümise, jätkas ta siiski 87 lisasumba kasutamist.
Furthermore they argue that expanding the number of cages had a broader scope than operations normally undertaken by private businesses would have as a private business simply would not invest on such a large scale without knowing that the operation can be profitable on a large scale.
SDVO liisis ja rentis oma infrastruktuuri ja püügiteenused ühele teisele ettevõtjale ning jätkas sel moel oma äritegevust.
However, the Commission doubts that the acquisition and exploitation of 87 additional cages can be viewed as a short-term action.
Asjaolu, et rannakarpide projekti kasutamise jaoks asutati äritegevusega tegelev tütarettevõtja, tundub kinnitavat seda, et SDVO-l puudus tõeline kavatsus lihtsalt tuua oma tegevusega asjaomasele sektorile kasu.
First, the Commission find that the acquisition of 87 additional cages corresponds to a long-term investment that is hard to reconcile with the concept of short-term action.
Sellega seoses märgib komisjon, et 2009. aastal SDVO ja VSVC vahel sõlmitud lepingud sisaldasid sätteid (nt tagatiste andmise kord, sätted mis tahes huvide konfliktide vältimiseks VSVC ja teiste tootjate vahel), mille eesmärk oli kaitsta VSVC ärihuve.
Second, the Commission observes that SDVO does not seem to have conceived the acquisition of the 87 additional cages as a short-term action that would exclusively serve the purpose of making the study possible.
Sellise korra ja selliste sätete olemasolu tundub kinnitavat seda, et lisasumpade kasutamine oli äritegevus ja selle puhul ei lähtutud ühistest huvidest.
SDVO has treated the acquisition of the cages as an investment and has looked for ways to have a return on the investment.
Komisjoni meelest kaasnevad 87 lisasumba soetamisega kulud, mis kuuluvad tavapärase tootmistegevuse juurde.
Indeed, already in 2008 it had plans to continue the business through a newly established subsidiary.
Komisjon leiab, et kui toote majanduslikku ja bioloogilist teostatavust on kontrollitud ning see on leidnud kinnitust, on tootmisvahendite soetamine ja täiendamine äriühingu tootmis- ja äritegevuse arendamise protsessi tavaline osa.
Also in 2009, when SDVO officially stopped selling the Flanders Queen Mussel, it actually continued, nonetheless, to exploit the 87 additional cages.
Komisjon ei ole nõus Belgia ametiasutuste väitega, mille kohaselt ei investeeriks ükski äriühing täiendavatesse tootmisvahenditesse, omamata eelnevalt tagatisi selle kohta, et tootmise laiendamine osutub kasumlikuks.
As a matter of fact, it leased and rented its infrastructure and harvesting services to another company and thus carried out a commercial activity.
Tegelikult investeerivad äriühingud tootmise laiendamisse ka olukordades, kus ükski teine äriühing ei ole veel samas mahus tootmist katsetanud.
The fact that a commercial subsidiary was established to exploit the mussels project seems to confirm that indeed there was no genuine intention on behalf of SDVO to simply deliver the results for the benefit of the sector.
Nad tuginevad oma varasematele väiksemamahulise tootmise käigus saadud kogemustele ja tulevikuprognoosidele.
In this context the Commission notes that the agreements concluded in 2009 between SDVO and VSVC contained provisions designed at protecting the commercial interests of VSVC (e.g. guarantee arrangement, provisions for the prevention of any conflict of interests between VSVC and other producers).
Üldmajanduses valitseb põhimõte, et tänu mastaabisäästule on see, mis on võimalik ja kasumlik väiksemas mahus, võimalik ja veelgi kasumlikum suuremas mahus, sest püsikulud hajutatakse suurema tootekoguse peale.
Such types of arrangements and provisions would seem to confirm that the exploitation of the additional cages was a commercial activity and was not in the collective interest.
Lõpetuseks ei ole komisjon seda meelt, et SDVO on võtnud oma tootmisvahendite laiendamisega sektori huve teeniva meetme.
In the Commission's opinion, the 87 additional cages correspond to expenditures belonging to normal production.
Seda tõestab veelgi asjaolu, et SDVO tundus olevat pigem konkurent kui eksperimenti teostav üksus.
Indeed, the Commission believes that once the economic and biological feasibility of a product has been tested and confirmed, it belongs to the normal production and business development process of a firm to acquire and expand its production means.
Eespool nimetatud põhjustel leiab komisjon, et SDVO on kasutanud kava alusel heaks kiidetud abi seoses 87 lisasumba kasutamisega vääralt.
The Commission does not agree with the Belgian authorities' argument, according to which no firm would invest in additional production means without having beforehand guarantees that the production on a larger scale will be profitable.
Projekti „Dagverse vis” reklaamikampaania
In fact, firms do invest in production on a larger scale also in situations when no other firm has already tried to produce at the same scale.
Komisjon märgib, et kiites toodete Belgia päritolu ehk Belgia rannapüügilaevastiku püütud kalu, vastandades need välisriikide laevade püütud kaladele, on SDVO viidanud toodete geograafilisele päritolule ning on seega tegutsenud vastuolus oma põhikirjaga ja otsusega N 274/03.
They rely on their past experience with producing at a smaller scale and on future forecasts.
Komisjon võtab siiski arvesse asjaolu, et projekti „Dagverse vis” kampaaniat on kohandatud ja selles ei viidata enam toodete geograafilisele päritolule.
Finally, the Commission does not consider that, by expanding its production means, SDVO has undertaken an action in the interest of the sector.
Uute koorikloomavarude otsimine
As there was already another operator established in this sector that had been developing a business on a real scale, the acquisition and exploitation of 87 additional cages indeed had a direct impact on the market and on competition.
Komisjon täheldab, et uute koorikloomavarude otsimist ei ole SDVO põhikirjas SDVO ülesannete loetelus nimetatud.
This is further demonstrated by the fact that the SDVO appeared as a competitor rather than an entity undertaking an experiment.
Eelkõige ei tundu see olevat kooskõlas ülesannetega, mida on kirjeldatud rubriigis c „Vee-elusressursside majandamise ja kalanduse kontrollimise edendamine”.
For the above reasons, the Commission considers that SVDO has been misusing the aid authorised under the Scheme as far as the exploitation of 87 additional cages is concerned.
Seetõttu leiab komisjon, et sellised meetmed ei kuulu meetmete hulka, mille komisjon on heaks kiitnud oma otsuses N 274/03.
Dagverse vis promotion campaign
Tegemist ei ole ei kontrolli- ega kaitsemeetmega.
The Commission notes that by praising the Belgian origin of the products (fish caught by the Belgian coastal fleet) in contrast to fish caught by foreign vessels, SDVO has effectively made reference to the geographic origin of the products and has as such acted in contravention to its articles of association and to Decision N 274/03.
Vastupidi, meetme eesmärk on leitavate varude kasutamine kaubanduslikul otstarbel, mis toob lõppkokkuvõttes kaasa püügikoormuse suurenemise.
The Commission however takes note of the fact that the Dagverse vis campaign has been adapted and stopped making reference to the geographical origin of the products.
Edasi märgib komisjon, et kaubanduslikul otstarbel kasutamiseks kõlblike uute koorikloomvarude otsimine ei saanud kuuluda komisjoni otsuses N 274/03 heaks kiidetud meetmete hulka, sest vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 2792/1999 artiklile 17, millele viidatakse 2001. aasta kalandussuunistes, võib Kalanduse Arendusrahastu (FIFG) [6] toetada eksperimentaalset püüki vaid juhul, kui selle eesmärk on kalavarude säilitamine.
For the above reasons, the Commission considers that SVDO has been misusing the aid authorised under the Scheme as far as the promotion campaign making reference to the geographic origin is concerned.
Nagu juba märgitud, ei tundu kaubanduslikel eesmärkidel kasutamiseks kõlblike koorikloomavarude olemasolu kindlakstegemisel Belgia mandrilaval olevat eesmärgiks nende varude säilitamine, vaid pigem nende kasutamine.
Finding new stocks of shellfish
Pealegi on uute kasutamiskõlblike varude otsimine eraettevõtjate tavapärane tegevus ja sellega kaasnevad kulud on tavapärased tootmiskulud, mistõttu ei saa neid kava alusel rahastada.
The Commission observes that finding new stocks of shellfish is not listed amongst SDVO's missions in its articles of association.
Eespool nimetatud põhjustel leiab komisjon, et SDVO on kasutanud kava alusel heaks kiidetud abi seoses uute koorikloomavarude otsimisega vääralt.
In particular, it does not seem to correspond to the missions described under the heading (c) ‘Improving the management of the living aquatic resources and the control on fisheries’.
JÄRELDUS