natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, even this forecast shows that Gdansk airport alone would be sufficient, without a further investment, to serve the demand in the region at least until 2025 (on the basis of the adjusted traffic forecasts as described in recital 45).
25. aprill 2012, summa 31009000 zlotti;
Furthermore, according to the information provided by Poland the current capacity of the runway in Gdansk airport is 40-44 operations per hour and the current use is on average 4,7 operations per hour.
27. mai 2013, summa 6469000 zlotti;
On the basis of information provided by Poland (see recitals 192–196 above) the Commission observes that Gdansk airport will be only used at around 50–60 % of its capacity in the coming years.
17. juuni 2013, summa 20031000 zlotti.
Consequently, even in the event of a dynamic passenger growth in the Pomeranian Region, Gdansk airport will be able to meet the demand of airlines and passenger during a long period of time.
Intressi arvutatakse liitintressina kooskõlas komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 794/2004 V peatükiga [65].
The Commission further observes that Gdansk airport offers more than 40 national and international destinations (both point to point connections and connections to hubs: Frankfurt, Munich, Warsaw and Copenhagen).
Poola tühistab alates käesoleva otsuse teatavakstegemisest kõik artikli 1 lõikes 2 osutatud abi veel tegemata maksed.
As mentioned in recital 60, Poland argues on the one hand that for land planning and environmental consideration the extension of the capacity of Gdansk airport is limited.
Artikkel 3
On the other hand, Poland argues that there are no limitations to the capacity extensions at Gdansk airport.
Artikli 1 lõikes 1 osutatud abi nõutakse tagasi viivitamata ja tõhusalt.
The Commission considers that the arguments regarding the capacity expansion restrictions are contradictory and in any case they are not substantiated and therefore, the Commission cannot base its assessment on them.
Poola tagab käesoleva otsuse rakendamise nelja kuu jooksul alates otsuse teatavakstegemise kuupäevast.
In view of the spare capacity of Gdansk airport that will not be fully used in the long-term, and the plan to further expand capacity at that airport if necessary in the long term, the Commission considers that the creation of another airports in the Pomeranian region would not contribute to the region’s development.
Artikkel 4
The Commission further observes that with Gdansk airport the Pomeranian Region is already well connected and the new airport will not increase the connectivity of this region.
Kahe kuu jooksul pärast käesoleva otsuse teatavakstegemist esitab Poola komisjonile järgmise teabe:
The Commission also notes that the business model of Gdynia airport suggests that it would compete for passengers with Gdansk airport in the LCC, charter and also general aviation markets.
abisaajalt tagasi nõutav kogusumma (põhisumma ja intress);
Moreover, the creation of a new airport to serve as a back-up, emergency airport cannot justify the scale of investment at Gdynia airport.
käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks juba võetud ja kavandatavate meetmete üksikasjalik kirjeldus;
In the light of the above, the Commission considers that the investment at Gdynia airport will lead to a mere duplication of infrastructures in the region, which does not meet a clearly defined objective of common interest.
dokumendid, mis kinnitavad, et abisaajale on antud korraldus abi tagasi maksta.
The infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set
Poola teavitab komisjoni käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks võetud riiklike meetmete rakendamisest, kuni artikli 1 lõikes 1 osutatud abi on täielikult tagasi makstud.
As stated in recitals 189 to 202, the Commission considers that the catchment area of Gdynia airport is and will be efficiently served by Gdansk airport.
Poola esitab komisjoni taotlusel viivitamata teabe käesoleva otsuse täitmiseks juba võetud ja kavandatavate meetmete kohta.
In addition, both airports would pursue a similar business model and focus mainly on LCC’s and charters.
Ta esitab ka üksikasjalikud andmed abisaajalt juba tagasi saadud abisummade ja intressi kohta.
In absence of a clearly defined objective of common interest the Commission considers that the infrastructure cannot be considered to be necessary and proportional to an objective of common interest (see also recital 202 above).
Artikkel 5
The infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
Käesolev otsus on adresseeritud Poola Vabariigile.
As stated in point (i), Gdynia airport is located only around 25 kilometres away from the existing Gdansk airport and both airport have the same catchment area and a similar business model.
Brüssel, 11. veebruar 2014
The capacity of Gdansk airport is currently used at less than 60 %.
Komisjoni nimel
Taking into account the investments currently being carried out, Gdansk airport is sufficient to serve, depending on the forecasts used, the demand in the region at least until 2025–2028 and further expansions of Gdansk airport are feasible.
Joaquín Almunia
The Commission also notes that the business plan for Gdynia airport shows that the airport would generate about [80–90] % of revenue from serving low-cost and charter carriers.
ELT C 243, 23.8.2013, lk 25.
It means that it would focus on markets that are a core business of Gdansk airport.
Alates 1. detsembrist 2009 muutusid EÜ asutamislepingu artiklid 87 ja 88 vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu („ELi toimimise leping”) artikliteks 107 ja 108.
In this context, the Commission also observes that Poland did not provide any proofs of a possible collaboration between both airports.
Sätted on sisult identsed.
Also plans to generate revenues from other aviation and non–aviation activities (production and services) would not alone be sufficient to cover the high operational costs related to running Gdynia airport.
Käesolevas otsuses tuleb viiteid Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklitele 107 ja 108 käsitada vajaduse korral vastavalt viidetena EÜ asutamislepingu artiklitele 87 ja 88.
Consequently, the Commission considers that Gdynia airport does not have satisfactory medium-term prospects for use.
Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepinguga tehti terminoloogiasse teatavaid muudatusi: „ühendus” asendati „liiduga” ja „ühisturg” „siseturuga”.
All potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner
Käesolevas otsuses kasutatakse läbivalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu terminoloogiat.
Poland confirmed that all potential users will have access to the airport infrastructure on an equal and non-discriminatory basis without any commercially unjustified discrimination.
Vt joonelalune märkus 1.
The development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest
Vastavalt valitud teekonnale on Gdynia ja Gdanski lennujaama vahemaa autoga sõites 26–29 kilomeetrit; allikas:
The Commission notes that Poland did not provided any proofs that Gdynia and Gdansk airport would form a collaborative aviation hub.
Gdanski lennujaam kuulub avaliku sektori asutuste asutatud äriühingule Gdansk Lech Wałęsa Airport Ltd, mis seda ka käitab.
Rather, it would seem logical that the two airports would have to compete for essentially attracting the same passengers.
Äriühingu aktsiakapital jaguneb järgmiselt:
The Commission further notes that the business plan of Gdynia airport (around [80 - 90] % of revenue generated by low-cost and charter flights) and the scale of investments (e.g. a terminal with the capacity of 0,5 million passengers per annum that is to be expanded in the future) do not confirm the view that Gdynia airport would focus on general aviation traffic and would provide only or mainly services to the general aviation sector.
Gdanski linn (32 %), Pomorze vojevoodkond (32 %), riigiettevõte Poola Lennujaamad (31 %), Sopoti linn (3 %) ja Gdynia linn (2 %).
Taking into account the above and the fact that both airports would focus first on LCC and charters, the Commission considers that the aid is directed to an airport, which would be in direct competition with another airport in the same catchment area without there being a demand for airport service that could not be served by the existing airport.
Gdanski Lech Wałęsa lennujaam (edaspidi „Gdanski lennujaam”) on Poola suuruselt kolmas lennujaam.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the aid in question would affect trade to an extent contrary to the common interest.
2012. aastal külastas seda 2,9 miljonit reisijat (2,7 miljonit regulaarlendudel ja 0,2 miljonit tellimuslendudel).
The absence of a common interest objective that the aid is intended to achieve, strengthen that conclusion.
Gdanski lennujaamast pakuvad regulaarlennuteenuseid järgmised kaheksa lennuettevõtjat (jaanuar 2014):
Based on the data provided by Poland the Commission considers that the investment costs can be lower than for the construction of other comparable regional airports in Poland.
Wizzair (22 sihtkohta), Ryanair (7 sihtkohta), Eurolot (4 sihtkohta), LOT (2 sihtkohta), Lufthansa (2 sihtkohta), SAS (2 sihtkohta), Air Berlin (1 sihtkoht), Norwegian (1 sihtkoht).
This is mainly due to usage of existing infrastructure of the military airport.
Alates uue terminali avamisest mais 2012 suudab Gdanski lennujaam teenindada viit miljonit reisijat aastas.
Moreover, Poland argues that without the aid the investment would not be undertaken by the airport manager.
Poola esitatud teabe kohaselt suurendab terminali laiendamine (kava järgi 2013–2015) lennujaama teenindamisvõimet seitsme miljoni reisijani.
The Commission further observes that due to long period necessary to reach the break-even point for such type of investment the public financing could be necessary to change the behaviour of the beneficiary in such a way that it entered the investment.
Investeeringut Gdanski lennujaama rahastati ka riigiabist (vt komisjoni 2008. aasta otsus riigiabi N 153/08 kohta – 1,7 miljonit eurot (ELT C 46, 25.2.2009, lk 7); komisjoni 2009. aasta otsus riigiabi N 472/08 kohta, mille tulemusena eraldas Poola Gdanski lennujaamale umbes 33 miljonit eurot (ELT C 79, 2.4.2009, lk 2)).
Moreover, since the expected profitability of the investment project cannot be established (see recital 177) and a market economy investor would not pursue such project, it is indeed likely that the aid changes the behaviour of the airport manager.
Praegune Gdynia-Oksywie sõjaväelennuväli asub Gdynia linna ja Kosakowo omavalitsuse vahelisel piiril.
However, in absence of a clearly defined objective of common interest, the Commission concludes that the aid cannot be considered to be necessary and proportional to that objective.
Lepingule kirjutasid alla Pomorze ametiasutused, Gdanski, Gdynia ja Sopoti linn, Kosakowo omavalitsus ning Poola valitsuse (Pomorze vojevoodkonna, kaitseministeeriumi ja transpordiministeeriumi) esindajad ja Gdanski lennujaam.
Consequently, the Commission considers that the investment aid of Gdynia and Kosakowo in favour of Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd does not comply with the requirements of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines and cannot be found compatible with the internal market.
Poola arvates hõlmavad avalike huvidega seotud investeeringud päästetöötajate, tolliametnike, lennujaama turvatöötajate, politseinike ja piirivalvurite jaoks ette nähtud hooneid ja varustust, lennujaama piirdeaeda koos videojälgimisseadmetega jmt.
The Commission is of the view that the financing of operating losses of Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd constitutes operating aid, reducing the airport operator’s current expenditure.
Nominaalväärtuses.
According to the case law of the Court, such operating aid is in principle incompatible with the internal market.
Nüüdispuhasväärtus näitab, kas konkreetsest projektist saadav tulu ületab kapitali (alternatiiv)kulu.
According to the 2005 Aviation Guidelines, operating aid granted to airports can only be declared compatible under exceptional circumstances and strict conditions in underprivileged regions.
Projekti loetakse majanduslikult elujõuliseks investeeringuks, kui selle nüüdispuhasväärtus on positiivne.
The Commission notes that Gdynia airport is located in an underprivileged region covered by the derogation set out in Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU, and thus, the Commission has to assess whether the operating aid at stake can be considered compatible under the RAG.
Investeeringud, mille tulu on väiksem kui kapitali (alternatiiv)kulu, ei ole majanduslikult elujõulised.
According to paragraph 76 of the RAG, the operating aid in regions eligible under the derogation in Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU may be granted provided that following cumulative criteria are met:
Kapitali (alternatiiv)kulu iseloomustab diskontomäär.
it is justified in terms of its contribution to regional development and its nature and (ii) its level is proportional to the handicaps it seeks to alleviate.
Jääkväärtus on kõikide stabiilse kasvumäära korral edaspidi teenitud rahavoogude nüüdisväärtus (st lennujaama käitaja omakapitali väärtus esitatud äriplaani viimasel aastal).
Poland is of the opinion that the operating aid is compatible with the paragraph 76 of the RAG (see recitals 77–79).
Komisjoni teatis „Ühenduse suunised lennujaamade rahastamise ja piirkondlikest lennujaamadest opereerivate lennuettevõtjate riikliku stardiabi kohta” ( ELT C 312, 9.12.2005, lk 1).
Since the Pomeranian Region is already served by Gdansk airport and the new airport will not increase the connectivity of this region, the Commission cannot conclude that the aid would contribute to regional development.
Regionaalabi suunised aastateks 2007–2013 (ELT C 54, 4.3.2006, lk 13).
The Commission considers that in absence of that, it cannot be concluded that the operating aid is proportional to the handicaps it seeks to alleviate, as the Pomeranian Region does not appear to suffer from any connectivity handicap.
Sisemine tasuvuslävi mõõdab tulu/kasumit, mida investor on investeeritud kapitalilt teeninud.
Moreover, the Commission considers the assessed operating aid is allocated to a part of predetermined expenditure.
Sel ajal kohaldatavad eeskirjad olid sätestatud komisjoni 15. detsembri 2006. aasta määruses (EÜ) nr 1998/2006, milles käsitletakse asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist vähese tähtsusega abi suhtes (ELT L 379, 28.12.2006, lk 5).
However in the view of the Commission’s assessment of the business plan for Gdynia airport and it’s assessment of the level of foreseen revenues and costs, presented in section 5.1.3, it cannot be concluded that the aid would be limited to a necessary minimum, granted on a transitional basis and be degressive.
Investeerimisprojekti üldkavas määratleti lennujaama muutmiseks vajalikud eri meetmed.
In particular, with regard to the uncertainties regarding the expected profitability of the airport operator (see section on the existence of aid) the transitional nature and degressivity of the aid cannot be ensured.
Vabade rahavoogude meetodi abil arvutatakse igal aastal ettevõtte ärikasum, liites kulumi ja amortisatsiooni (kuna need on mitterahalised kulutused) ja lahutades investeerimisvajadused, käibekapitali ja maksude muutused (vt 2010. aasta uuringu tabel 5).
In any case, the Commission considers that granting operating aid in order to ensure the operation of an investment project that benefits of incompatible investment aid is inherently incompatible with the internal market.
Seega võetakse vabade rahavoogude meetodi arvutustes arvesse kõiki lennujaama muutmisega seoses kavandatud kapitalikulusid.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the operating aid in favour of Gdynia-Kosakowo airport Ltd granted by Gdynia and Kosakowo does not comply with the criteria set out in the RAG.
Kapitali kaalutud keskmine hind on määr, mida äriühing peab oma varade rahastamiseks maksma kõikidele väärtpaberiomanikele.
Conclusion on comptibility
See põhineb riskivabal määral […] %, krediidiriski preemial […] %, ettevõtte tulumaksu 19 % määral, beetakordajal […], turumäära preemial […] % ning laenu […] % ja omakapitali […] % struktuuril (vt 2010. aasta uuringu punkt 4.4, lk 21).
Consequently, the Commission concludes that the State aid granted to Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd is incompatible with the internal market.
Komisjon märgib, et Poola esitatud arvutused näivad viitavat, et turumajandusliku investeerimise põhimõtte järgimise uuringus kasutati langusperioodi struktuuriga kapitali kaalutud keskmist hinda.
The Commission has not identified any other compatibility clause that could potentially be relevant for declaring the present aid compatible with the Treaty.
Jääkväärtus põhines eeldusel, et stabiilne kasv on […] %.
Likewise Poland has invoked neither any compatibility clause nor provided any substantial arguments that would allow the Commission to declare the present aid compatible.
Riskivaba määra suurendati […] protsendini ja beetakordajat […]-ni.
The investment and operating aid which Poland has granted or intends to grant in favour of Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd are incompatible with the internal market.
Kapitali struktuuri muudeti laenu osa suurendamisega ([…] %) ja omakapitali osa vähendamisega ([…] %).
Poland has unlawfully implemented the aid in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Ettevõtte vabad rahavood = omakapitali vaba rahavoog + võetud krediit ja laenud – tagasimakstud krediit ja laenud – krediidi ja laenude intress.
RECOVERY
Ettevõtte vabade rahavoogudega võrreldes diskonteeritakse omakapitali vaba rahavoogu omakapitali tootlusega, mis ületab alati kapitali kaalutud keskmist hinda.
In accordance with the TFEU and the Court of Justice’s established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter aid [61] when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market.
Selle tulemusena näitab arvutatud nüüdispuhasväärtus, milline osa investeeringu tasuvusest on aktsionäridele (omakapitali investeerijatele) kättesaadav.
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation [62].
Omakapitali vaba rahavoo alusel arvutatud nüüdispuhasväärtus ei kajasta seepärast investeeringu üldist tootlust, st tulu aktsionäridele ja tulu võlausaldajatele.
In this context, the Court has stated that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored [63].
Et kajastada lennujaamade käitajate ja lennujaamades teenuseid osutavate äriühingute levinuima rahastamisstruktuuri erinevusi, vähendati omakapitali tootlust enne keskmiste arvutamist.
Following that case-law, Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [64] laid down that ‘where negative decisions are taken in respect of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.’
Riskivaba määra suurendati […] protsendini ja beetakordajat […]-ni.
Therefore, the State aid mentioned above must be reimbursed to the Polish authorities, insofar as it has been paid out,
Trójmiasto on Pomorze kolme suuremat linna (Gdańsk, Gdynia ja Sopot) hõlmav linnastu.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Trójmiasto piirkonnas on praegu kolm lennujaama:
Article 1
Lech Wałęsa lennujaam Gdanskis, sõjaväelennuväli Pruszcz Gdanskis ning sõjaväelennuväli Gdynia ja Kosakowo piiril (Gdynia-Oksywie).
The State aid, unlawfully put into effect by Poland between 28 August 2007 and 17 June 2013 in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in favour of Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. by means of capital injections amounting to PLN 91714000 PLN is incompatible with the internal market.
Kohtuasi C-35/96 komisjon vs. Itaalia [1998] EKL I-3851;
The State aid which Poland is planning to implement for Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. after 17 June 2013 for the conversion of the military airport of Gdynia-Kosakowo into a civil aviation airport is incompatible with the internal market.
kohtuasi C-244/94 Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurances vs. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche [1995] EKL I-4013;
The State aid may accordingly not be implemented.
kohtuasi C-55/96 Job Centre [1997] EKL I-7119.
Article 2
Kohtuasi 118/85 komisjon vs. Itaalia [1987] EKL 2599;
The dates on which the sums to be recovered were put at the disposal of the beneficiary are the following:
vt ka kohtuasi T-128/89 Aéroports de Paris vs. komisjon [2000] EKL II-3929, kinnitanud Euroopa Kohus, kohtuasi C-82/01P, EKL 2002, I-9297 ning kohtuasi T-196/04 Ryanair vs. komisjon [2008] EKL II-3643.
28 August 2007 for the amount of 50000 PLN;
Kohtuasjad C-159/91 ja C-160/91, Poucet vs. AGV ja Pistre vs. Cancave [1993] EKL I-637.
4 March 2008 for the amount of 200000 PLN;
Kohtuasi C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft vs. Eurocontrol [1994] EKL I-43.
11 September 2008 for the amount of 500000 PLN;
Komisjoni otsus N 309/02, 19. märts 2003, Lennundusjulgestus – kulude hüvitamine pärast rünnakuid 11. septembril 2001.
28 July 2009 for the amount of 1345000 PLN;
Kohtuasi C-343/95 Cali & Figli vs. Servizi ecologici porto di Genova [1997] EKL I-1547;
8 December 2010 for the amount of 4361000 PLN;
komisjoni otsus N 309/02, 19. märts 2003;
8 July 2011 for the amount of 25970000 PLN;
komisjoni otsus N 438/02, 16. oktoober 2002, Abi sadamavaldajatele ametiülesannete täitmiseks.
1 September 2011 for the amount of 1779000 PLN;
Vt joonealune märkus 32.
25 April 2012 for the amount of 31009000 PLN;
Vt eelkõige kohtuasi C-364/92 SAT/Eurocontrol [1994] EKL I-43, punkt 30, ja kohtuasi C-113/07 P Selex Sistemi Integrati vs. komisjon [2009] EKL I-2207, punkt 71.
27 May 2013 for the amount of 6469000 PLN;
Lennundusseadus (Ustawa z dnia 3 lipca 2002 r. – Prawo lotnicze (JoL 2002, nr 130, artikkel 1112, muudetud)), vt muu hulgas artikleid 74 ja 84.
17 June 2013 for the amount of 20031000 PLN.
Kohtuasi C-482/99 Prantsusmaa vs. komisjon [2002] EKL I-4397.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [65].
12. mai 2011. aasta otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-267/08 ja T-279/08, Nord-Pas-de-Calais [2011] EKL II-01999, punkt 108.
Poland shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1(2) with effect from the date of notification of this Decision.
Kohtuasi C-305/89 Itaalia vs. komisjon („ALFA Romeo”) [1991] EKL I-1603;
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1(1) shall be immediate and effective.
Kohtuasi C-40/85 Belgia vs. komisjon [1986] EKL I-2321.
Poland shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Ehkki komisjon palus Poola ametiasutustel esitada arvutuste tegemiseks koostatud Exceli tabelid koos valemitega, esitasid Poola ametiasutused Exceli tabelid ilma valemiteta.
Article 4
Vt joonealune märkus 38.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Poland shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Kohtuasi C-124/10P Euroopa Komisjon vs. Électricité de France (EDF) [2012], EKLis veel avaldamata, punkt 85.
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
Projekti ettevalmistamisel läbiviidud uuringute rahastamiseks oli kasutatud vaid […] miljonit zlotti (umbes […] miljonit eurot).
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
11. märtsi 2011. aasta kokkuleppega nähakse ette Gdynia rahaline sissemakse kogusummas 59,048 miljonit zlotti (14,8 miljonit eurot) ajavahemikus 2011–2013 ja Kosakowo mitterahaline sissemakse (iga-aastase renditasu vahetamine aktsiate vastu) ajavahemikul 2011–2040.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
Kõnealune omakapitali väärtus hõlmab rahavoogude nüüdispuhasväärtust ajavahemikul 2012–2040 ja lennujaama käitaja 2040. aastaks arvutatud diskonteeritud jääkväärtust.