natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes in that regard that EGO 24 was notified to the Romanian Competition Council in light of the modifications envisaged by EGO 75 and that the Romanian Competition Council, by its Decision No 244/2000 of 15 May 2000, found those incentives to constitute incompatible State aid.
Kahepoolne investeerimisleping jõustus 1. aprillil 2003.
It was after the adoption of that decision, on 1 June 2000, that S.C.
Vt joonealune märkus 4.
European Food SA obtained its PIC, which made it eligible to obtain State aid under the scheme set up by EGO 24 as explained in recital 133.
15. jaanuaril 2014 oli Euroopa Keskpanga viitekurss 4,52 leud 1 euro eest.
However, that does not mean the aid was granted on that date, as explained in recital 134.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 659/1999, 22. märts 1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (EÜT L 83, 27.3.1999, lk 1).
It follows from that at the time S.C.
Vt põhjendus 3.
European Food SA was granted the unlawful State aid provided by EGO 24, which is in any event after 1 June 2000, it must have been fully aware of the Romanian Competition Council’s decision of 15 May 2000 declaring the EGO 24 incentives to be incompatible State aid.
Vt allmärkus 2.
Moreover, it must also have been aware of the Europe Agreement, which entered into force on 1 January 1995, and Romanian Law No 143/1999 on State aid, which entered into force on 1 January 2000, both of which prohibited Romania from granting State aid and conferred the power on the Romanian Competition Council to authorise the grant of new State aid.
Blokeeritud kontole on kantud täitekulude katmiseks veel 6028608 leud.
Absent such an authorisation from the Competition Council and in line with the case-law of the CJEU, which applied by virtue of the Article 64 of the 1995 Europe Agreement, Article 1 of the Implementing Rules to Decision No 4/2000 of the EU-Romanian Association Council and the acquis communautaire, S.C.
EÜT L 357, 31.12.1994, lk 2.
European Food SA could never have entertained a legitimate expectation that the incentives granted under EGO 24 constituted compatible State aid, regardless of the subsequent actions of the Romanian Government after Decision No 244/2000 was adopted.
Vt ka ELi–Rumeenia assotsiatsiooninõukogu 10. aprilli 2001. aasta otsuse nr 4/2000 (millega võetakse kooskõlas Euroopa lepingu (millega luuakse assotsiatsioon ühelt poolt Euroopa ühenduste ja nende liikmesriikide ning teiselt poolt Rumeenia vahel) artikli 64 lõikega 3 vastu kõnealuse lepingu artikli 64 lõike 1 punktis iii ja lõikes 2 ning kõnealuse lepingu protokolli nr 2 (mis käsitleb Euroopa Söe- ja Teraseühenduse (ESTÜ) tooteid) artikli 9 lõike 1 punktis iii ja lõikes 2 nimetatud riigiabisätete kohaldamise eeskirjad) artikkel 2 (EÜT L 138, 22.5.2001, lk 16).
The same reasoning obviously applies to Multipack and Starmill, which only obtained their PICs on 17 May 2002, two years after Decision No 244/2000 was adopted.
Monitorul Oficial, I osa, nr 73, 12. aprill 1993.
Thus, the claimants cannot even validly claim a legitimate expectation that the EGO 24 scheme constituted lawful State aid, which the Commission considers irrelevant for the purposes of the present Decision.
Konkurentsinõukogu oli ja on konkurentsi ja riigiabi valdkonnas tegutsev autonoomne haldusasutus, kellel on nimetatud valdkondades reguleerimis- ja uurimisvolitused, mis sarnanevad Euroopa Komisjoni vastavatele volitustele.
Therefore, any payment of the compensation awarded to the claimants by the Tribunal must be recovered by Romania since that payment constitutes unlawful and incompatible State aid.
Konkurentsiamet oli valitsusele alluv eripädevusega asutus.
As the five claimants, together with the other relevant EFDG companies constitute a single economic unit (see recital 91), the five claimants and the other relevant EFDG companies shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by any one of them to the Romanian state.
Ameti põhiülesanded olid järgmised: i) korraldada uurimisi ning jälgida õigusnormide ja konkurentsinõukogu otsuste jõustamise tõhusust; ii) teostada järelevalvet avaliku sektori üksuste ja riigiettevõtete hinnakujundustegevuse üle ning iii) tagada riigiabi läbipaistvus ja kontrollida riigiabi kulusid ja neist aru anda.
According to Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 the aid to be recovered pursuant to a recovery decision shall include interest at an appropriate rate fixed by the Commission.
ELi-Rumeenia assotsiatsiooninõukogu määras oma otsuse nr 4/2000 artiklis 1 konkurentsinõukogu ja konkurentsiameti Rumeenia üksusteks, kes kontrollivad ja hindavad riigiabi vastavust 1995. aasta Euroopa lepingule.
Interest shall be payable from the date on which the unlawful aid was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery.
Tsiviilotsus nr 26 (vt vahekohtuotsuse punkt 219).
Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 provides that recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures under the national law of the Member State concerned, provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the Commission’s decision.
Vt vahekohtuotsuse punkt 224.
To this effect and in the event of a procedure before national courts, the Member States concerned shall take all necessary steps which are available in their respective legal systems, including provisional measures, without prejudice to Union law.
Euroopa Liidu ühine seisukoht, 21. november 2001, CONF-RO 43/01, lk 4.
The Commission observes in this respect that Romania has already offset the amount of RON 337492864 (ca.
Kanditaatriigi ühinemisprotsessi käigus kavandab komisjon korrapäraselt ja nõukogu võtab vastu nn ühised seisukohad, milles hinnatakse kandidaatriigi edusamme vastuvõtukriteeriumide täitmisel.
EUR 76 million [97]) against tax debts owed by one of the claimants, S.C. European Food SA.
Erakorralisele määrusele nr 94/2004 lisatud põhjendav aruanne, 26. august 2004, lk 12.
The Commission further observes that on 5 January 2015 the court-appointed executor seized RON 36484232 (ca.
Kahepoolse investeerimislepingu artikli 9 lõige 1.
EUR 8,1 million [98]) from Romania’s Ministry of Finance and subsequently transferred RON 34004232 (ca.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 725.
EUR 7,56 million) in equal parts to three of the five claimants, and kept the remainder as compensation for execution costs.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 827.
Between 5 February and 25 February 2015, the court-appointed executor seized a further RON 9197482 (ca.
Vt allmärkus 24.
EUR 2 million) [99] from the bank accounts of the Ministry of Finance.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 872.
In addition, the Commission takes note of the fact that the Romanian authorities have voluntarily transferred RON 472788675 (ca.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 875 jj.
EUR 106,5 million [100]) (including the costs of court appointed executor of RON 6028608) into a blocked account in the name of the five claimants.
Summa arvutamisel on võetud arvesse importi ajavahemikus 22. veebruarist 2005 kuni 31. märtsini 2009.
Those sums, as well as any further payments to the claimants in fulfilment of the Award which have taken or will take place, must be recovered by Romania.
Vt joonealune märkus 28.
Accordingly, the Commission,
Hagejad taotlesid hüvitist PETi hinna suurenemise eest.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Vahekohus lükkas selle taotluse siiski tagasi, sest hageja ei olnud tegelikult saanud kunagi seoses PETi impordiga osa toorainemeetme soodustustest.
Article 1
Selle summa arvutamisel on aluseks võetud suhkru impordil nõutud tollimaks, mida oleks olnud võimalik vältida, kui hagejal oleks olnud võimalus varuda suhkrut enne erakorralise määruse kavandatud aegumist (1. aprill 2009).
The payment of the compensation awarded by the arbitral tribunal established under the auspices of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) by award of 11 December 2013 in Case No ARB/05/20 Micula a.o. v Romania [101] to the single economic unit comprising Viorel Micula, Ioan Micula, S.C.
Võrdlusaluseks on 2004./2005. aasta varud.
Multipack, European Drinks SA, Rieni Drinks SA, Scandic Distilleries SA, Transilvania General Import-Export S.R.L., and West Leasing S.R.L constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty which is incompatible with the internal market.Article 2
Saamata jäänud kasumi arvutamisel on lähtutud turuosa vähenemisest karastusjookide ja muude suhkrut sisaldavate toodete turul ajavahemikul 2004–2008.
Romania shall not pay out any incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 and shall recover any incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 which has already been paid out to any one of the entities constituting the single economic unit benefiting from that aid in partial implementation or execution of the arbitral award of 11 December 2013, as well as any aid paid out to any one of the entities constituting the single economic unit benefiting from that aid in further implementation of the arbitral award of 11 December 2013 that the Commission has not been made aware of or that is paid out after the date of this Decision.
Nõude kohaselt suurenesid pärast erakorralise määruse stiimulite kaotamist kulud, mis tõi kaasa kõrgemad hinnad, ja sellest tulenevalt vähenes turuosa.
Multipack, European Drinks SA, Rieni Drinks SA, Scandic Distilleries SA, Transilvania General Import-Export S.R.L., and West Leasing S.R.L shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by any one of them.
Bukaresti kohtu kohtuasi nr 3456/3/2014.
The sums to be recovered are those resulting from the implementation or execution of the award of 11 December 2013 (principal and interest).
Bukaresti kohtu korraldus kohtuasjas nr 9261/3/2014, IV jagu „Tsiviilõigus”.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Bukaresti kohtu kohtuasi nr 15755/3/2014, III jagu „Tsiviilõigus”.
Romania shall provide the exact dates on which the aid provided by the state was put at the disposal of the respective beneficiaries.
Bukaresti apellatsioonikohtu kohtuasi nr 15755/3/2014/al, IV jagu „Tsiviilõigus”.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [102].
Vt allmärkus 36.
Romania shall ensure that no further payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be effected with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Euroopa Keskpanga viitekurss 5. jaanuaril 2015: 1 euro = 4,49 leud.
Article 3
Vt allmärkus 38.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Euroopa Keskpanga viitekurss 9. märtsil 2015: 1 euro = 4,44 leud.
Romania shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Ameerika Ühendriikide Columbia ringkonnakohtu kohtuasi nr 1-14-cv-600 Viorel Micula vs. Rumeenia valitsus – petitsioon ICSIDi otsuse kinnitamiseks ja otsuse registreerimiseks.
Article 4
Vt allmärkus 7.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Romania shall submit the following information:
Vt allmärkus 40.
the total amount of aid received by each entity mentioned in Article 1 of this Decision;
Vt menetluse algatamise otsuse põhjendus 39.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Kohtuasi 61/79: Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato vs. Denkavit italiana (EU:C:1980:100).
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Komisjoni otsus 2008/408/EÜ, 20. november 2007, riigiabi C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) kohta, mida Itaalia andis äriühingutele ThyssenKrupp, Cementir ja Nuove Terni Industrie Chimiche (ELT L 144, 4.6.2008, lk 37).
Romania shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Viidatud on otsusele kohtuasjas T-68/03: Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies (EU:T:2007:253, punkt 42).
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-487/06 P; British Aggregates vs. komisjon (EU:C:2008:757, punktid 85 ja 89) ja tsiteeritud kohtupraktika ning otsus kohtuasjas C-279/08 P: komisjon vs. Madalmaad (NOx) (EU:C:2011:551, punkt 51).
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades C-180/98 kuni C-184/98: Pavlov jt (EU:C:2000:428, punkt 74).
Article 5
Otsus kohtuasjas C-170/83: Hydrotherm (EU:C:1984:271, punkt 11).
This Decision is addressed to Romania.
Vt ka otsus kohtuasjas T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow vs. komisjon (EU:T:2004:304, punkt 50).
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2015.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-480/09 P: Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA vs. komisjon (EU:C:2010:787, punktid 47–55); otsus kohtuasjas C-222/04: Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA jt (EU:C:2006:8, punkt 112).
For the Commission
Vt vahekohtuotsuse punktid 935–936 ja 943.
Member of the Commission
Otsus kohtuasjas C-170/83: Hydrotherm (EU:C:1984:271, punkt 10).
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87, and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-222/04: Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA jt (EU:C:2006:8, punkt 112).
The two sets of Articles are in substance identical.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-222/04: Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA jt (EU:C:2006:8, punkt 114).
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
Vt põhjendused 87 ja 88.
The Treaty also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-39/94: SFEI jt (EU:C:1996:285, punkt 60); otsus kohtuasjas C-342/96: Hispaania vs. komisjon (EU:C:1999:210, punkt 41).
The terminology of the Treaty will be used throughout this Decision.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 917.
OJ C 393, 7.11.2014, p.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 928.
27.
Vahekohtuotsuse punkt 953.
ICSID Case No ARB/05/20, Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, SC European Food SA, SC Starmill SRI, SC Multipack SRL v Romania, final award of 11 December 2013.
Vahekohtuotsuse alusel makstavad summad on esitatud põhjendus 27.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 11 December 2013: 1 EUR = 4,45 RON.
Vahekohus järeldas, et erakorralise määruse nr 24 stiimulite tühistamisega peteti hagejate õiguspäraseid ootusi (vahekohtuotsuse punktid 725 ja 726) juba enne seda, kui ta vaatles Rumeenia tegevuse mõistlikkust või läbipaistvust (neid vaadeldakse alles vastavalt punktides 727 jj ja 837 jj).
The BIT entered into force on 1 April 2003.
Seega ei ole mingit alust hagejate kombel väita, et vahekohtu järeldus kahepoolse investeerimislepingu rikkumise kohta oli tingitud investorite erakorralise määruse nr 24 kohaste kohustuste säilitamise ebamõistlikkusest või Rumeenia tegevuse ebapiisavast läbipaistvusest.
See footnote 4.
Vahekohtuotsuse punktid 953, 961, 971, 984, 1016, 1020, 1136.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 15 January 2014: 1 EUR = 4,52 RON.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades 106/87 kuni 120/87: Asteris (EU:C:1988:457).
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades 106/87 kuni 120/87: Asteris (EU:C:1988:457, punkt 23).
1).
Vt komisjoni otsus, 16. juuni 2004, abi kohta, mida Madalmaad andsid Akzo-Nobelile kloori transpordi vähendamiseks (juhtum N 304/2003, otsuse kokkuvõte: ELT C 81, 2.4.2005, lk 4); vt ka komisjoni otsus, 20. detsember 2006, abi kohta, mida Madalmaad andsid autolammutusettevõtte Steenbergen ümberpaigutamiseks (juhtum N 575/05, otsuse kokkuvõte: ELT C 80, 13.4.2007, lk 1).
See recital 3.
Samadel põhjustel peab komisjon kehtetuks ka taotluse joonealuses märkuses 53 loetletud vahekohtumenetluste aluseks olevaid ELi-siseseid kahepoolseid investeerimislepinguid.
See footnote 2.
Vt ka komisjoni talituste töödokument, 15. aprill 2013, kapitali vaba liikumise kohta ELis, SWD(2013)146 final, lk 11 ja 14; komisjoni talituste töödokument, 18. märts 2014, kapitali vaba liikumise kohta ELis, SWD(2014)115 final, lk 12; ning Euroopa Komisjon, Monitoring activities and analysis, Bilateral Investment Treaties between EU Member States (intra-EU BITs) 2012, mille leiab aadressilt: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/capital/analysis/monitoring_activities_and_analysis/index_en.htm.
An additional RON 6028608 have been transferred on the blocked account as compensation for the execution costs.
28. aprilli 2005. aasta arvamus liidetud kohtuasjades C-346/03 ja C-529/03: Atzori (ECLI:EU:C:2005:256, punkt 198).
OJ L 357, 31.12.1994, p.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-384/08: Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou vs. komisjon (EU:T:2011:650) ja otsus kohtuasjas T-565/08: Corsica Ferries vs. komisjon (EU:T:2012:415, punktid 23, 114 ja 120–131).
2.
Vt ka analoogne otsus kohtuasjas C-111/10: komisjon vs. nõukogu (EU:C:2013:785, punkt 44).
See also Article 2 of the Implementing Rules to Decision No 4/2000 of the EU-Romania Association Council of 10 April 2001 adopting the implementing rules for the application of the provisions on State aid referred to in Articles 64(1)(iii) and (2) pursuant to Article 64(3) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Romania, of the other part, and in Article 9(1)(iii) and (2) of Protocol 2 on European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) products to that Agreement (OJ L 138, 22.5.2001, p.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-119/05: Lucchini (EU:C:2007:434, punkt 59).
16).
Otsus kohtuasjas C-280/00: Altmark Trans (EU:C:2003:415, punkt 84).
Monitorul Oficial, first part, No 73 of 12 April 1993.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-351/02: Deutsche Bahn AG vs. komisjon (EU:T:2006:104, punkt 101).
The Competition Council was and is an autonomous administrative authority in the field of competition law and State aid law with regulatory and investigative powers, similar to the European Commission in the field of competition and State aid law.
Otsus kohtuasjas 730/79: Phillip Morris (EU:C:1980:209, punkt 11).
The Competition Office was a specialised authority subordinate to the government.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-298/97, T-312/97 jne: Alzetta (EU:T:2000:151, punkt 80).
The main responsibilities of the Office were: (i) to carry out investigations and to survey the effective enforcement of legal provisions and the decisions of the Competition Council; (ii) to supervise the setting of prices by public entities and public companies; and (iii) to ensure transparency of State aid, and to monitor and report State aid expenditure.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-288/97: Friulia-Venezia Giulia (EU:T:2001, lk 115, punkt 41).
By Article 1 of the implementing rules to Decision No 4/2000 the EU-Romania Association Council designated the Competition Council and Competition Office as the Romanian entities responsible for surveying and assessing the compatibility of State aid with the 1995 Europe Agreement.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EL) nr 1219/2012, 12. detsember 2012, millega kehtestatakse üleminekukord liikmesriikide ja kolmandate riikide vaheliste kahepoolsete investeerimislepingute jaoks (ELT L 351, 20.12.2012, lk 40).
Civil Decision No 26; see Award, paragraph 219.
Aluslepingu artikli 3 lõike 1 punkt e.
See Award, paragraph 224.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-129/12: Magdeburger Mühlenwerke (EU:C:2013:200, punkt 40).
European Union Common Position of 21 November 2001, CONF-RO 43/01, p.
Selle algse sätte tõlge, millega nähti ette toorainete meede (investeerimisstiimul, mille tühistamise tulemusel määrati vahekohtuotsusega taotlejatele kahjutasu), on esitatud vahekohtuotsuse punktis 148.
4.
Kolm ühinemisaktis nimetatud olemasoleva abi kategooriat on järgmised:enne 10. detsembrit 1994 jõustunud abimeetmed;käesoleva lisa liites loetletud abimeetmed;abimeetmed, mida uue liikmesriigi riigiabi järelevalveasutus enne ühinemiskuupäeva hindas ja mis loeti acquis’le vastavaks ning mille kohta komisjon ei ole esitanud punktis 2 ettenähtud korras vastuväiteid sel alusel, et on tõsiseid kahtlusi meetme kokkusobivuses ühisturuga.Mis tahes otsus vahekohtuotsuse täitmise kohta ei kuulu ühtegi nendest kolmest kategooriast.
During the accession process of an applicant country, the Commission regularly proposes and the Council adopts so-called common positions, in which the progress of the candidate country towards compliance with the accession criteria is evaluated.
Isegi kui leitakse, et vahekohtuotsuse rakendamisega pelgalt taastatakse hagejate erakorralise määruse nr 24 kohased õigused – justkui selle määrusega ette nähtud stiimuleid ei oleks enne nende kavandatud aegumist tühistatud –, tuleks seda tagasiulatuvat taastamist siiski käsitada alates Rumeenia ühinemisest liiduga uue abina.
Article 9(1) of the BIT.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-68/03: Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies AE vs. komisjon (EU:T:2007:253, punkt 34).
Award, paragraph 725.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-225/91: Matra vs. komisjon (EU:C:1993:239, punkt 41).
Award, paragraph 827.
Regionaalabi suunised aastateks 2007–2013 (ELT C 54, 4.3.2006, lk 13).
See footnote 24.
2007. aasta suuniste punkt 76.
Award, paragraph 872.
Komisjoni otsus N 2/07 (otsuse kokkuvõte: ELT C 73, 30.3.2007, lk 15).
Award, paragraphs 875 et seq.
Komisjoni otsus SA 38364 (otsuse kokkuvõte: ELT C 233, 18.7.2014, lk 1).
This amount is calculated for imports made during 22 February 2005 and 31 March 2009.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-70/72: komisjon vs. Saksamaa (EU:C:1973:87, punkt 13).
See footnote 28.
Otsus liidetud kohtuasjades C-278/92, C-279/92 ja C-280/92: Hispaania vs. komisjon (EU:C:1994:325, punkt 75).
The claimants asked for compensation for the increased cost of PET.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-75/97: Belgia vs. komisjon (EU:C:1993:311, punktid 64-65).
However, the Tribunal rejected this claims on the basis that the claimants had never in fact benefited from the Raw Materials Facility with respect to PET imports.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-148/04: Unicredito Italiano (EU:C:2005:774, punktid 104–111).
This amount is calculated on the basis of custom duties charged on imported sugar and that would have been avoided, if the claimant had had the opportunity to stockpile sugar before the envisaged expiry of the EGO (i.e. 1 April 2009).
Otsus kohtuasjas C-217/06: komisjon vs. Itaalia (EU:C:2007:580, punkt 23 ja tsiteeritud kohtupraktika).
The benchmark is based on stockpiles in 2004/2005.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-5/89: komisjon vs. Saksamaa (EU:C:1990:320, punkt 14).
Lost profits are calculated over the period 2004-2008 for loss of market shares of soft drinks and other products that did contain sugar.
ICSIDi 11. detsembri 2013. aasta lõppotsus kohtuasjas nr ARB/05/20: Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, SC European Food SA, SC Starmill SRI, SC Multipack SRL vs. Rumeenia.
The claim is that after the revocation of the EGO incentives, the costs increased leading to higher prices and thus to lower market shares.
Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 794/2004, 21. aprill 2004, millega rakendatakse nõukogu määrust (EÜ) nr 659/1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 93 kohaldamiseks (ELT L 140, 30.4.2004, lk 1).
Order issued by Bucharest Tribunal in Case No 9261/3/2014, Section IV Civil.
Selle otsusega kutsus komisjon huvitatud isikuid üles esitama märkusi.
Case No 15755/3/2014, Bucharest Tribunal, Section III Civil.
Rumeenia esitas oma märkused menetluse algatamise otsuse kohta 26. novembril 2014.
Case No 15755/3/2014/a1, Bucharest Court of Appeal, Section IV Civil.
Hagejad kui huvitatud pool esitasid oma märkused 8. detsembril 2014 pärast seda, kui komisjon oli tagasi lükanud nende taotluse saada märkuste esitamiseks rohkem aega.
See footnote 36.
Hagejate märkused edastati Rumeeniale, kellele anti võimalus neile vastata.