natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For this, the Commission has doubts that at the present time, an appropriate benchmark can be identified to establish a true market price for services provided by airports.
Otsus kohtuasjas 173/73: Itaalia Vabariik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL 1974, lk 709), punkt 13.
In the absence of an identifiable market benchmark, the Commission has to assess the ex ante incremental profitability of the 2007 schedule of charges.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsusmaa vs. komisjon, (Stardust Marine’i kohtuasi) (EKL 2002, lk I-4397), punkt 69.
The 2007 schedule of charge was introduced to enhance the competitiveness of Saarbrücken Airport.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-305/89: Itaalia vs. komisjon (Alfa Romeo kohtuasi) (EKL 1991, lk I-1603); otsus kohtuasjas T-296/97 Alitalia vs. komisjon (EKL 2000, lk II-3871).
When drawing up the 2007 schedule of charges, the operator of Saarbrücken Airport analysed passenger numbers, airport movements as well as the financial results of the years 1997–2006.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-40/85: Belgia vs. komisjon (EKL 1986, lk I-2321).
According to Germany, a market analysis undertaken at that time showed that Saarbrücken was one of the most expensive airports in Germany.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsusmaa vs. komisjon (EKL 2002, lk I-04397).
The Commission observes that TUIFly left Saarbrücken as from late 2006.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-124/10P: Euroopa Komisjon vs. Électricité de France (EDF) [2012], EKLis veel avaldamata (EDFi kohtuotsus), punkt 85.
In addition, Saarbrücken Airport faced new competition from Zweibrücken after 2006.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-280/00: Altmark Trans GmbH, Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg vs. Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (EKL 2003, lk I-7747), punktid 87–93.
All these factors together led Saarbrücken Airport to reconsider its pricing policy and to introduce a revised schedule of charges offering incentives in form of discounts in order to ensure its future viability and profitability.
Vt ELT L 219, 24.8.2007, lk 9, punktid 111 jj.
While, according to the available information, no ex ante profitability studies have been prepared for the 2007 schedule of charges, Germany has submitted that Saarbrücken Airport expected that virtually no additional investments would be required to provide additional airport services to airlines and that no additional operating costs would arise.
Otsus kohtuasjas T-214/95: Het Vlaamse Gewest vs. komisjon (EKL 1998, lk II-717).
Therefore, in Germany’s view no ex ante profitability study was necessary.
Vt komisjoni 1. oktoobri 2014. aasta otsus riigiabi SA.27339 kohta – Saksamaa – Zweibrückeni lennujaam, Euroopa Liidu Teatajas veel avaldamata.
Hence, the incremental costs were limited to the incentives offered.
50 % FSBG aktsiatest oli kuni 30. juunini 2007 Fraport AG omanduses.
In this context, the Commission observes that the 2007 schedule of charges indeed offered discounts only for new airlines, new connections, or increased passenger numbers with the consequence that it did not impact negatively on the status quo at the airport.
Einschätzung der rheinland-pfälzischen Innenministeriums, 15. mai 2003.
The Commission observes that before the introduction of the 2007 schedule of charges, Saarbrücken airport’s capacity was utilised only at 50 %.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 659/1999, 22. märts 1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 108 kohaldamiseks (EÜT L 83, 27.3.1999, lk 1).
Indeed, passenger numbers decreased from 487 000 in 2005 to 350 000 in 2007, whereas the airports potential annual capacity would have been 700 000 passengers per annum.
Otsus kohtuasjas T 109/01: Fleuren Compost vs. komisjon (EKL 2004, lk II-127).
The Commission notes that after the departure of TUIFly Saarbrücken Airport had spare capacities, with the consequence that additional traffic could be handled without the need to upgrade infrastructure or acquire additional equipment or hire new staff.
EÜT C 119, 22.5.2002, lk 22.
Germany confirmed that there was no need to hire new staff or to expand existing infrastructure or other equipment in order to serve new airlines or connections (for instance the existing baggage belts and personnel were sufficient).
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punkt 173.
With any new airline or connection, aeronautical as well as non–aeronautical revenues would be generated.
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punkt 172.
Given that the level of costs remained stable, any new airline or connection would, according to Germany, provide a positive contribution to the airport’s profitability.
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punkti 25 alapunkt 22.
The fact that Saarbrücken indeed managed to attract a number of new airlines (such as Air Berlin, which started operating from Saarbrücken in late 2007) and to establish new connections after the introduction of the 2007 schedule of charges also indicates that the discount–based strategy to increase its business was successful.
Väljendatakse intressi-, maksu- ja amortisatsioonieelse kasumina.
The available data finally demonstrates that the 2007 schedule of charges resulted in a gradual increase of revenue for the airport (from […] in 2007 to […] in 2010).
Aastatel 2000–2012 avalike huvidega seotud ülesannete täitmist puudutavate kulude osas ei ole aga täpsed andmed kättesaadavad.
The Commission further notes that when assessing airport/airline arrangements, it should also assess the extent to which the arrangements can be considered part of the implementation of an overall strategy of the airport to lead to profitability at least in the long term.
Komisjon nendib, et avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannete kulude kohta ei ole täpsed arvud kättesaadavad.
In this respect, the Commission has to take into account the factual evidence that was available, and the developments that could reasonably be expected, at the time when the 2007 schedule of charges was made, in particular the prevailing market conditions, notably the market changes induced by the liberalisation in the air transport market, the market entry and development of low cost carriers and other point–to–point carriers, changes in the organisational and economic structure of the airport industry as well as the degree of diversification and complexity of the functions undertaken by airports, the enhancement of the competition between airlines and airports, the uncertain economic environment due to the changes in the prevailing market conditions or any other uncertainty in the economic environment have to be taken into account.
Seoses sellega ei ole komisjonil võimalik kindlaks teha FSBesitzG/FSG-le investeeringuteks eraldatud abi täpset summat.
The Commission notes that, as described in 335, several reasons (such as new competition from Zweibrücken after 2006 and the departure of TUIFly from the end of 2006) led Saarbrücken Airport to consider a revised schedule of charges with discounts being a necessary step in ensuring its future viability and profitability.
Vt joonealune märkus 46.
Finally, the Commission notes that the airport infrastructure is open to all airlines and not dedicated to a specific airline.
Aktualisierte Stellungnahme zur Nachfrageprognose für den Flughafen Kassel-Calden, Intraplan Consult GmbH, 12. märts 2012, punkt 8.
In the light of these considerations, accepting that an increase in activity resulted in virtually no incremental costs but could be expected to create incremental revenue, the Commission accepts that in adopting the 2007 schedule of charges and the discounts contained therein, Saarbrücken Airport acted like a MEO.
Saksamaa 16. aprillil 2012 esitatud teave, lk 65.
Therefore, the measure did not grant the affected airlines any economic advantage.
Saksamaa 16. aprillil 2012 esitatud teave, lk 9 ja manus 2.
Marketing agreement with Air Berlin
Saksamaa 16. aprillil 2012 esitatud teave, lk 66.
In the contract concluded between Air Berlin and Saarbrücken Airport on 6 April 2011, the two parties agreed that Air Berlin would increase the frequency of its flights to and from Berlin by an additional five return–flights per week, and the frequency of its flights to and from […] by an additional three return–flights per week until the end of April 2014.
Saksamaa 16. aprillil 2012 esitatud teave, lk 33.
In return for this frequency increase and the commitment from Air Berlin that it would advertise the new frequency, Saarbrücken Airport committed to paying a total of [EUR 800 000–EUR 1 700 000] to Air Berlin in 2011 and 2012.
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punkti 137 kohaselt ei kohaldata minevikus eraldatud tegevusabi suhtes kõiki suuniste 5.1 jaos sätestatud tingimusi.
Germany provided an analysis of the profitability of the contract that could be expected at the time of the conclusion of the contract, undertaken by FSG.
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punktid 113 ja 137.
It was submitted that apart from the direct marketing payments, the increased frequency would not cause any additional costs for the airport, which according to Germany could handle the additional traffic on the basis of the existing infrastructure and personnel.
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punktid 116 ja 137.
The analysis was based on the following expectations:
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punktid 124 ja 137.
Table 10
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punktid 125 ja 137.
Ex ante profitability of marketing agreement with Air Berlin (figures in EUR)
2014. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punktid 131 ja 137.
2011–2014
Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 794/2004, 21. aprill 2004, millega rakendatakse nõukogu määrust (EÜ) nr 659/1999, millega kehtestatakse üksikasjalikud eeskirjad EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 93 kohaldamiseks, artikli 4 lõige 1 (ELT L 140, 30.4.2004, lk 1).
Incremental Revenues
Vt FSBesitzG põhikirja paragrahvi 10 punkt i, mille kohaselt peab FSBesitzG ja FSBG rendilepingu iga muudatuse kiitma heaks FSBesitzG järelevalvenõukogu.
Incremental Costs
Tabelis 10 esitatud täiendavad kulud puudutavad turustamisega seotud makseid.
Result
Euroopa Komisjoni volinik Antonio Tajani vastas parlamendiliikme küsimusele 5. septembril 2008.
While the ex ante analysis undertaken by FSG and submitted by Germany did not discount the future payments to the date on which the contract was concluded, it is clear that the contract was expected to be profitable.
Küsimus registreeriti ka kaebusena numbri CP 171/2008 all.
Germany confirmed that to date, the increased frequency as foreseen by the marketing agreement has not required to hire new staff or to make specific investments: Overall, the Airport’s expectations were to a large extent met and the contract has been profitable.
Komisjon taotles Saksamaalt 31. juulil 2008, 24. septembril 2010, 24. märtsil 2011 ja 8. augustil 2011 lisateavet.
In this context, Germany provided a projection for the duration of the contract, based on the profits made in the first 8 months of the contract period (from April 2011–January 2012), according to which the contract appears to be profitable.
Saksamaa vastas neile taotlustele ja esitas lisateabe 4. novembril 2008, 17. jaanuaril 2011, 14. juunil 2011 ja 7. oktoobril 2011.
Having analysed the contract and the expectations of FSG at the time of the conclusion of the contract, the Commission is satisfied that the contract contributed to the profitability of Saarbrücken Airport, in that the expected incremental revenues were higher than the expected incremental costs.
Saksamaa esitas oma märkused 29. oktoobri 2012. aasta kirjaga.
As the contract thus complied with the MEO principle, it did not grant Air Berlin an advantage.
Eraisikud saatsid oma märkused menetluse raames, märkides, et lennujaamale eraldatud riiklik toetus kujutas endast riigiabi.
Having found that the 2007 schedule of charges and the discounts contained therein as well as the 2011 marketing agreement between Air Berlin and Saarbrücken Airport did not grant the respective airlines an advantage, the other criteria for the existence of aid do not need to be assessed.
Pärast ametliku uurimismenetluse algatamist taotles komisjon lisateavet 24. veebruaril 2012, 23. aprillil 2012, 16. oktoobril 2012, 26. novembril 2013 ja 14. märtsil 2014.
It can be concluded that no State aid was granted to the airlines in question.
Saksamaa vastas neile taotlustele ja esitas lisateabe 17. aprillil 2012, 4. mail 2012, 14. detsembril 2012, 14. jaanuaril 2014 ja 3. aprillil 2014.
The Commission observes that Cirrus Airlines, which received direct payments from FSBesitzG in 2005 and 2006, filed for insolvency in January 2012; the insolvency procedure was opened in April 2012.
2014. aasta lennundussuunised avaldati Euroopa Liidu Teatajas 4. aprillil 2014 [6].
As a consequence, Cirrus Airline has ceased its economic activity.
Need asendasid 2005. aasta lennundussuunised [7].
As the outcome of the insolvency proceedings is not clear, the Commission is for the moment not in a position to take a view as to whether the investigation concerning the payments to Cirrus Airlines might have become devoid of purpose.
Saksamaa teatel suudab lennujaam ohutusega seotud taristust tulenevate piirangute tõttu teenindada vaid 700 000 reisijat aastas.
The payments to Cirrus Airline are therefore not subject to this Decision.
2008. aasta alguses kaks äriühingut ühinesid ja moodustasid taas Flughafen Saarbrücken GmbH (edaspidi: „FSG”), taastades nii olukorra, mis eelnes osalisele erastamisele Fraport AGle 1997. aastal.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that the financing of FSBesitzG/FSG by way of capital injection to cover the losses in the years 2000–2012 constitutes State aid in so far as it was related to activities outside the public policy remit.
Alates 2008. aastast kuni tänaseni kuulub FSG 100 % äriühingule vh Saar.
The aid constitutes new aid from 1 June 2007 onwards.
Saarimaa majandus- ja rahandusministeerium lõi äriühingu vh Saar 1996. aastal.
Part of the aid is compatible investment aid pursuant to the 2005 Aviation Guidelines and part of the aid is compatible operating aid pursuant to the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Äriühingu eesmärk on koordineerida Saarimaa riiklike lennujaamade ja sadamate ehitamise, laiendamise ja käitamisega seotud tegevust.
The Commission further concludes that the capital injections granted to vh Saar do not constitute State aid as vh Saar passed on all the public funds received and therefore did not itself obtain an economic advantage.
FSBG loodi 4. juulil 1997.
The transfer of plots of land without a remuneration or at a price below the market price in the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 constitutes State aid in so far as it was related to activities outside the public policy remit.
Selle eesmärk oli Saarbrückeni lennujaama käitamine.
The aid is compatible as investment aid pursuant to the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
FSG loodi 30. augustil 2008.
The guarantees on loans were all granted before the year 2000 and therefore do not constitute State aid.
Selle eesmärk oli Saarbrückeni lennujaama tsiviillendude ja seonduvate abiettevõtete käitamine.
The advantage contained in the comfort letters, if any, was passed on from vh Saar to FSBesitzG/FSG.
Kasumi ja kahjumi ülekandmise leping sõlmiti esialgu vh Saari ja FSBesitzGi õiguseellase FSG vahel 1. jaanuaril 1997.
The 2006 lease contract involved State aid for FSBG, which is compatible operating aid pursuant to the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Pärast FSG taasloomist sai temast sellest lepingus FSBesitzG järglane.
No State aid was granted to airlines through the 2007 schedule of charges and the marketing agreement with Air Berlin.
FSBG, kes oli kuni 2008. aastani FSBesitzG-st õiguslikult eraldiseisev, teenis kuni 2006. aastani kasumit.
The start–up aid in favour of Cirrus Airline is not subject to the present Decision.
Kasum jagati aktsionäridele (kuni 30. juunini 2007 FSBesitzG ja Fraport AG), sel juhul kajastusid need aktsionäride järgmise aasta bilansis tuludena või investeeriti uuesti.
Finally, the Commission notes that on 17 June 2014, Germany informed the Commission that it exceptionally accepts that this decision is adopted in the English language,
See reisijate arv ületati esimest korda 1996. aastal.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Sellel aastal ulatus Saarbrückeni lennujaama reisijate arv 395 000ni ja see arv kasvas kuni 2000. aastani, mil ulatus 484 566 reisijani.
Article 1
Algatamisotsuses arutleti kõigepealt selle üle, kas lennujaama rahastamist saaks pidada siseturuga kokkusobivaks abiks üldist majandushuvi pakkuvaid teenuseid käsitleva 2005. aasta otsuse alusel [18].
The State aid which Germany has implemented for Saarbrücken Airport is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union.
Täheldati, et kättesaadavaks ei tehtud mingit teavet, mis näitaks, et piirkond, kus lennujaam asub, oleks ilma lennujaamata sedavõrd eraldatud, et tema sotsiaalne ja majanduslik areng oleks ohus.
The measures which Germany has implemented for airlines (2007 schedule of charges, marketing agreement with Air Berlin) do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Komisjon analüüsis ka seda, kas 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste punktis 4.2 sätestatud tingimustest on kinni peetud.
Article 2
Kõnealused tingimused sarnanevad üldist majandushuvi pakkuvaid teenuseid käsitleva 2005. aasta otsuse tingimustele.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Ülesande andmise akti ja nende sätete puudumine, mis piiravad rahastamise lennujaama põhitegevusega, viis muu hulgas esialgse järelduseni, et rahastamine ei ole siseturuga kokkusobiv 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste punkti 4.2 tingimuste kohaselt.
Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.
Edasi analüüsiti algatamisotsuses, kas rahastamine võiks olla siseturuga kokkusobiv 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste punkti 4.1 kohaselt.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87, and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Hindamise ajal kättesaadava teabe alusel eeldas komisjon, et 11 453 000 euro suuruse laenu tagatis anti pärast 2000. aastat.
The two sets of Articles are in substance identical.
Komisjon selgitas, et kuna kõnealuse laenu tagatis ning 2005. ja 2006. aastal vh Saari võetud laenude kinnituskirjad katsid 100 % laenudest ja kuna Saarimaa ei saanud tagatise ja kinnituskirjade eest mingit hüvitist, siis kujutavad need endast riigiabi garantiidena antavat riigiabi käsitleva teatise tähenduses.
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
Algatamisotsuses eeldati, et 11 453 000 euro suuruse laenu tagatis anti pärast 2000. aastat.
The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
Arvestades, et kõnealust laenu kasutati uue terminali ehitamiseks, hinnati algatamisotsuses tagatise kokkusobivust siseturuga 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste punkti 4.1 kohaselt.
The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this Decision.
Komisjon jõudis esialgsele järeldusele, et on küsitav, kas uue terminali ehitamine täitis selgelt määratletud avaliku huvi eesmärke (kuna ei olnud selge, kas mõni muu lähedal asuv lennujaam ei oleks saanud samuti Saarbrückeni lennujaama teeninduspiirkonda teenindada), kas terminal oli vajalik lennujaama toimimiseks, kas sellel oli keskpika ajavahemiku jooksul rahuldav kasutamise perspektiiv (kuna Saksamaa ei esitanud mingeid andmeid selle kohta, millal lennujaam kasumlikuks muutub), kas kõigil kasutajatel oli võrdne ja mittediskrimineeriv juurdepääs taristule (kuna ei olnud selge, kas kõigil on samad eelised mis Cirrusel ja Air Berlinil), ning lõpuks, kas see mõjutas kaubanduse arengut ELi huvidele vastupidises suunas.
OJ C 213, 19.7.2012, p. 1.
Algatamisotsuse hetkel ei olnud komisjon saanud mingit teavet enne 2000. aastat sõlmitud rendilepingute kohta, ega selle kohta, kas 2006. aastani kehtinud lepingut on pärast 2000. aastat muudetud.
E–3778/08, 8 July 2008.
2006. aastani kehtinud lepingut oleks seega võinud käsitada riigiabina.
Cf. footnote 2.
Algatamisotsuses hinnati, kas soodustused võiksid kujutada endast 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste 5. jao kohast siseturuga kokkusobivat stardiabi.
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
Komisjon väljendas oma hindamises kahtlusi, kas siseturuga kokkusobiva stardiabi eri tingimused olid täidetud.
See footnote 5.
Lennutegevuse alguskuupäevaks määrati 29. märts 2005.
OJ C 113, 15.4.2014, p. 30.
Lepingu aluseks oli äriplaan, mis sisaldas reisijate arvu ja keskmist netotulu.
See footnote 7.
Algatamisotsuses hinnati, kas Cirrusega sõlmitud leping võiks liigituda 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste 5. jao kohaselt siseturuga kokkusobivaks stardiabiks.
http://www.flughafen–saarbruecken.de/index.php?id=372
Komisjon väljendas oma hindamises kahtlusi, kas siseturuga kokkusobiva stardiabi eri tingimused olid täidetud.
http://www.flughafen–saarbruecken.de/index.php?id=daten_fakten
6. aprillil 2011 allkirjastas FSG ettevõtjaga Air Berlin PLC & Co.
Business secret.
Luftverkehrs KG (edaspidi „Air Berlin”) turustamislepingu kestusega kuni 2. maini 2014.
Source: fastest route according to Google Maps.
Lepingu kohaselt kohustus Air Berlin osutama FSG-le turustamis- ja reklaamiteenuseid.
EBITDA including public funding and compensation for activities that fall within public policy remit or are considered as SGEI; see submission of information by Germany of 5 May 2012, Annex II.
Algatamisotsuses hinnati, kas turustamisleping võiks kvalifitseeruda 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste 5. jao kohaselt siseturuga kokkusobivaks stardiabiks.
As the owner and the operator were separate companies in these years (FSBesitzG and FSBG), EBITDA listed is the sum of the EBITDA of both companies.
Algatamisotsuses eeldati, et kolmest teadaolevast FSBesitzG-le antud tagatisest anti vaid üks pärast 2000. aastat.
Germany submits that due to the accounting system used, the costs of capital cannot be individually allocated to safety/security or other infrastructure.
Saksamaa selgitab siiski, et kõnealune tagatis anti tegelikult 1999. aastal ehk enne olulise tähtsusega otsust kohtuasjas „Aéroports de Paris”.
Submission of information by Germany of 17 January 2011, attachment 6, and of 16 April 2012, p. 9.
Saksamaa väidab, et kui meetmed liigituvad riigiabiks, siis on nad 2005. aasta lennundussuunistes sätestatud tingimuste alusel siseturuga kokkusobivad.
Submission of Information by Germany of 16 April 2012, p. 9.
Sellega seoses viitab ta seoses üldise rahastamismeetmega esitatud argumentidele, väites, et need kehtivad ka antud juhul.
Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67).
Saksamaa teatab, et soodustused viisid alates 2006. aastast reisijate arvu jätkuva suurenemiseni.
Communication from the Commission: Community Guidelines on State aid for Rescuing and Restructuring Firms in Difficulty (2004) (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
Saksamaa kirjeldab soodustuste positiivset mõju viidates Air Berlini otsusele hakata kasutama Saarbrückeni lennujaama, mis tehti alles pärast soodustuste kehtestamist.
Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10).
Komisjon tuletab meelde, et Euroopa Kohtu kohaselt „üksnes osaluste, isegi kontrollosaluste omamisest ei piisa, et nende osaluste omaniku tegevust majandustegevuseks lugeda, kui see tekitab üksnes aktsionäriks või osanikuks olemisega kaasnevate õiguste kasutamist ning olenevalt olukorrast dividendide saamist, mis on lihtsalt omandi viljad”.
Submission of information by Germany of 5 May 2012, Annex II.
Samas täheldab Euroopa Kohus, et seevastu „[...] tuleb äriühingus kontrollosalust omavat üksust, kes tegelikult ka seda äriühingut kontrollib, sekkudes otseselt või kaudselt selle juhtimisse, lugeda aktiivselt kontrollitava ettevõtja majandustegevuses osalevaks”.