natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The market share of the Union industry remained fairly stable and the volumes lost by the countries concerned were taken up by imports from the US at a price level similar to that of the Union industry.
Nagu põhjendustes 63 ja 75 järeldatud, on Hiina tootjatel märkimisväärne vaba tootmisvõimsust sulfaniilhappe tootmiseks, mis osutab dumpingu kordumise tõenäosusele.
The Union industry was able to increase its sales volumes, average sales prices and to achieve close to optimal capacity utilisation rates.
Lisaks, nagu märgitud põhjendustes 64 ja 87, selgus kättesaadavast teabest, et HRV oli hiljuti müünud Indiale üha suuremaid koguseid sulfaniilhapet hindadega, mis lõid alla liidu tootmisharu hinnad.
The moderate decline in the market share and the profitability of the Union industry cannot be attributed to the Chinese and Indian imports as explained in recital (113) above.
Lisaks osutab põhjenduses 64 käsitletud statistika India turule jõudva Hiinast pärit impordi kohta sellele, et Hiina on huvitatud peamiselt puhastatud klassi sulfaniilhappe müügist, mis liidu turule jõudes oleks otseses konkurentsis liidu tootja müüdava tootega.
It is therefore concluded that the Union industry did not suffer material injury during the review investigation period.
Kõik need tegurid koos osutavad sellele, et kui meetmetel lastakse aeguda, võib HRV kiiresti ja dumpinguhinnaga eksportida liidu turule märkimisväärses koguses sulfaniilhapet isegi ilma vajaduseta suunata ümber teiste turgude müüki.
Although the Union industry made some observations concerning the injury analysis, which were addressed above in recitals (89) to (90), (98)-(99) and (103)-(104), it agreed with the overall conclusion concerning the absence of material injury in particular during the RIP.
Liidu turg on kindade poolest atraktiivne ning võimaldaks Hiina eksportijatel saavutada tootmise suurendamise abil mastaabisääste.
Likelihood of recurrence of injury
Sellisel juhul väheneksid viivitamatult liidu tootmisharu müük ja müügihinnad, mis omakorda mõjutaks tootmisvõimsuse rakendamist ja kasumlikkust.
For the assessment of likelihood of recurrence of injury it is important to point out that under optimal capacity utilisation — which has been achieved during the review investigation period — the Union industry was not able to satisfy the whole Union consumption and consequently a significant part of the Union consumption needed to be covered by imports.
Nende kahjunäitajate halvenemisel pöörduks liidu tootmisharu taastumine kiirelt ümber, põhjustades materiaalset kahju.
In addition, the Union industry only produces purified sulphanilic acid, which means that users who prefer technical sulphanilic acid for their production have to turn to imports.
India puhul puudub vastavalt põhjendusele 76 dumpingu kordumise tõenäosus meetme aeguda laskmise korral.
Furthermore, the Union industry had a fairly stable market share with sales to a number of long-lasting customers.
Seda järeldust arvesse võttes ei ole kahju kordumise analüüs vajalik.
The investigation revealed that for some users the suppliers of sulphanilic acid need to undergo stringent and costly certification/verification process which makes changes from one supplier to another more difficult.
Järeldus kahju kordumise kohta
It is in this context that the likelihood of recurrence of injury if the measures were allowed to lapse is analysed in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Nagu uurimisest esitatud põhjenduste alusel selgub, on väga tõenäoline, et meetmete puudumine põhjustaks HRV madala hinnatasemega ekspordi märkimisväärse kasvu, mis mõjuks negatiivselt liidu tootmisharu finants- ja majandussuutlikkusele, tingides materiaalse kahju kordumist.
Since none of the Chinese exporting producers cooperated in the investigation, findings with regard to the PRC had to be based on best facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, in particular the expiry review request.
Kahju kordumise tõenäosust India puhul ei analüüsitud negatiivsete järelduste tõttu Indiast pärineva dumpingu kordumise kohta.
As already concluded in recitals (63) and (75), Chinese producers possess significant spare capacity of sulphanilic acid production and there is likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
E. LIIDU HUVID
In addition, as indicated in recitals (64) and (87), information available suggested that the PRC had recently sold increased quantities of sulphanilic acid to India at prices undercutting those of the Union industry.
Sissejuhatus
Finally, the statistics obtained on Chinese imports to the Indian market as explained in recital (64) seem to indicate that China is interested in selling predominantly purified grade sulphanilic acid which if directed to the Union market would enter into direct competition with the sales of the Union producer.
Seoses dumpinguvastaste meetmetega Indiast pärit sulfaniilhappe impordile, jõuti järeldusele, et dumpingu kordumine ei ole tõenäoline.
All these factors together indicate that the PRC could quickly export significant quantities of sulphanilic acid at dumped prices to the Union market without even the need to redirect its sales from other markets should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Seega ei ole liidu huvide kindlaksmääramine vajalik.
The Union market is attractive in terms of prices and would allow Chinese exporters to make economies of scale by increasing their production.
Hiina puhul uuriti vastavalt algmääruse artiklile 21, kas meetmete säilitamine oleks vastuolus liidu üldiste huvidega.
Were this to occur the Union industry would face an immediate drop in its sales and sales prices, which in turn would affect capacity utilisation and profitability.
Liidu huvide kindlaksmääramisel lähtuti kõigi asjaomaste huvitatud isikute, nimelt liidu tootmisharu, importijate ja kasutajate huvide hindamisest.
If these injury indicators deteriorated the recovery of the Union industry would be quickly reversed and material injury would occur.
Kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 21 lõikega 2 anti huvitatud isikutele võimalus oma seisukohad teatavaks teha.
With regard to India, as concluded above in recital (76) there is no likelihood of recurrence of dumping if measure were allowed to lapse.
Liidu tootmisharu huvid
In the light of this finding the analysis of recurrence of injury is not necessary.
Põhjenduse 113 kohaselt on meetmed olnud edukad ja võimaldanud liidu tootmisharul oma positsiooni tugevdada.
Conclusion on recurrence of injury
Samal ajal järeldati põhjenduses 130, et kui Hiina suhtes kehtestatud dumpinguvastastel meetmetel lastakse aeguda, siis on tõenäoline, et liidu tootmisharu seisund halveneb tunduvalt.
In view of the findings of the investigation as explained in the recitals above, the absence of measures would in all likelihood result in a significant increase of exports from the PRC at low prices, affecting negatively the financial and economic performance of the Union industry and resulting in recurrence of material injury.
Seega võib järeldada, et meetmete jätkamine Hiina suhtes oleks liidu tootmisharule kasulik.
The likelihood of recurrence of injury with regard to India was not analysed due to the negative finding concerning recurrence of dumping from India.
Kasutajate huvid
E. UNION INTEREST
Kõiki teadaolevaid kasutajaid teavitati läbivaatamise algatamisest.
Introduction
Komisjon sai oma küsimustikule sulfaniilhappe kasutajatelt neli täielikku vastust ja kolm osalist vastust või kommentaari.
With regard to the anti-dumping measures on imports of sulphanilic acid from India it was concluded that there was no likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Nende andmete põhjal tehti kindlaks, et vaatlusaluse toote tootmiskulude mõju tootmisahela järgmise etapi tootjate tootmiskuludele sõltub suurel määral järgmise etapi toote liigist.
Therefore, no determination with regard to the Union interest is necessary.
Mitu kasutajat (ravimite ja spetsiaalvärvide tootjat) möönsid, et sulfaniilhappe osakaal nende tootmiskuludes on tühine, mistõttu võib väita, et kõnealustel meetmetel ei ole praktilist mõju nende tootmiskuludele või hindadele.
In case of China, in accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the maintenance of the measures would be against the Union interest as a whole.
Teiste kasutajate (tsemendilisandite ja optiliste valgendite tootjate) puhul moodustas sulfaniilhape aga 4–12 % vastava tootmisahela etapi tootmiskuludest.
The determination of the Union interest was based on an appreciation of the various interests involved, namely those of the Union industry, of importers and users.
Need kasutajad teatasid ühtlasi kahjumist läbivaatamisega seotud uurimisperioodil ning väitsid, et osaliselt on nende raske olukord tingitud kehtivatest tollimaksudest.
The interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known pursuant to Article 21(2) of the basic Regulation.
Selle väitega seoses tuleb märkida, et HRVst pärit import läbivaatamisega seotud uurimisperioodil praktiliselt puudus, mistõttu Hiina suhtes kehtestatud tollimaksud, mis peaksid tagama õiglase hinnataseme liidu turul, ei põhjustanud kasutajatele vaatlusalusel perioodil lisakulusid ega selgita seetõttu kõnealuste kasutajate raskustesse sattumist.
Interest of the Union industry
Samasuguse toote hinnatõus vaatlusalusel perioodil oli tingitud tootmiskulude suurenemisest, mille põhjustas peamise tooraine hinnatõus, nagu märgitud põhjendustes 105 ja 108.
As explained in recital (113) the measures have been successful and enabled the Union industry to consolidate its position.
Praegu Indiast pärit sulfaniilhappe suhtes kehtivate tollimaksude tühistamine vastavalt käesolevale määrusele peaks viivitamatult lihtsustama sulfaniilhappe täiendava tarneallika kättesaadavust liidu turul konkurentsivõimeliste hindadega ja oleks seega kasutajate huvides.
At the same time, it was also concluded above in recital (130) that the Union industry would be likely to experience a serious deterioration of its situation in case the anti-dumping measures against China were allowed to lapse.
Järelikult võib väita, et meetmete kehtimajäämine Hiina suhtes ei põhjusta kasutajatele tulevikus ülemääraseid raskusi.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the continuation of the measures against China would benefit the Union industry.
Importijate huvid
Interest of users
Kõiki teadaolevaid importijaid teavitati läbivaatamise algatamisest.
All known users were informed about the initiation of the review.
Üks vaatlusaluse toote importija väitis oma osalises vastuses küsimustikule, et sulfaniilhape ei oma tema tegevuses tähtsat rolli.
The Commission received four complete questionnaire replies and three partial replies/comments from users of sulphanilic acid.
Ükski teine importija küsimustikule ei vastanud ega esitanud ka kirjalikke esildisi või kommentaare.
On the basis of these data it was established that the impact of the cost of the product concerned on the cost of production of the downstream products varies considerably among users depending on the type of the downstream product.
Kuna koostöö importijatega sellega piirdus, järeldati, et HRVst pärit impordi suhtes kehtestatud meetmete kehtimajäämine ei kahjustaks nende huve.
A number of users (pharmaceutical and specialty dye producers) admitted that sulphanilic acid plays only marginal role in their production costs and therefore it is considered that the measures have basically no impact on their production costs/prices.
Kokkuvõte
For other users (producers of cement additives and optical brighteners) however sulphanilic acid accounted for 4 % to 12 % of the cost of production of their downstream products.
Eespool kirjeldatut arvesse võttes järeldati, et puuduvad liidu huvidega seotud veenvad põhjused, mis räägiksid HRV vastaste dumpinguvastaste meetmete säilitamise vastu.
These users also reported losses during the review investigation period and claimed that the duties currently in force are partly responsible for their difficult situation.
F. HRV SUHTES VÕETUD DUMPINGUVASTASTE MEETMETE SÄILITAMINE JA INDIA SUHTES VÕETUD DUMPINGUVASTASTE MEETMETE LÕPETAMINE
With regard to this claim, it has to be noted that imports from the PRC were almost non-existent during the review investigation period and therefore duties against China, which would guarantee a fair price level on the Union market did not entail extra costs to users during the period considered and could thus not explain the difficulties encountered by these users.
Kõiki huvitatud isikuid teavitati peamistest asjaoludest ja kaalutlustest, mille põhjal leiti, et sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes kehtivad dumpinguvastased tollimaksud tuleks jätta kehtima HRVst pärit impordi puhul ning tunnistada kehtetuks Indiast pärit impordi puhul.
The price increase of the like product during the period considered was due to the increase of cost of production triggered by the increase of the price of the main raw material as indicated in recitals (105) and (108).
Lisaks anti huvitatud isikutele võimalus esitada pärast kõnealust teatavakstegemist märkusi.
Abolishing the duties currently in force against imports of sulphanilic acid from India as proposed by this regulation should immediately facilitate access for an additional source of sulphanilic acid supply on the Union market on competitive prices and thereby would be in the interest of the users.
Tehtud märkusi ja esitatud teavet võeti nõuetekohaselt arvesse, kui selleks oli põhjust.
Consequently, it is considered that maintaining the measures as far as China is concerned will not cause undue difficulties to users in the future.
Eelöeldust tuleneb, et vastavalt algmääruse artikli 11 lõikele 2 peaksid Hiinast pärit sulfaniilhappe suhtes kohaldatavad meetmed jääma kehtima ning Indiast pärit sulfaniilhappe suhtes kohaldatavad meetmed tuleks tunnistada kehtetuks.
Interest of importers
Komisjoni otsus, millega kiideti heaks kehtiv hinnakohustus seoses sulfaniilhappe impordiga tootjalt Kokan, tuleks samuti tunnistada kehtetuks.
All known importers were informed about the initiation of the review.
Võttes arvesse, et liidu tootmisharu taastumine on äsjane, jälgib komisjon liidu tootjalt sellekohase taotluse saamise korral vaatlusaluse toote importi.
One importer of the product concerned provided a partial questionnaire reply in which it claimed that sulphanilic acid does not play an important role in its activity.
Järelevalveperiood piirdub kahe aastaga pärast käesoleva määruse avaldamist,
No other importer replied to the questionnaire or provided any written submission or comment.
Käesolevas määruses sätestatud meetmete kehtimajäämine Hiina suhtes ja meetmete kehtetuks tunnistamine India suhtes on kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 15 lõike 1 alusel loodud komitee arvamusega,
In the absence of further cooperation from importers, it was concluded that it would not be against their interest to maintain the measures imposed on imports from the PRC.
ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE:
Conclusion
Artikkel 1
In view of above, it was concluded that there were no compelling reasons of Union interest against the maintenance of the anti-dumping measures against the PRC.
Käesolevaga kehtestatakse lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärit ja praegu CN-koodi ex29214200 (TARICi kood 2921420060) alla kuuluva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes.
F. MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES AGAINST THE PRC AND TERMINATION OF ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES AGAINST INDIA
Lõikes 1 kirjeldatud toodete vaba netohinna suhtes liidu piiril enne tollimaksu tasumist kohaldatakse järgmist lõplikku tasakaalustavat dumpinguvastast tollimaksu:
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is considered appropriate that the existing anti-dumping duties on imports of sulphanilic acid from the PRC be maintained and be repealed on imports from India.
Riik
Interested parties were also granted the possibility to submit comments subsequent to that disclosure.
Lõplik tollimaks (%)
The submissions and comments were duly taken into consideration where warranted.
Hiina Rahvavabariik
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to sulphanilic acid originating in China should be maintained and the anti-dumping measures applicable to sulphanilic acid originating in India should be repealed.
Lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks Indiast pärit ja praegu CN-koodi ex29214200 (TARICi kood 2921420060) alla kuuluva sulfaniilhappe suhtes tunnistatakse kehtetuks ning kõnealust importi käsitlevad menetlused lõpetatakse.
The Commission Decision accepting the undertaking currently in force concerning imports of sulphanilic acid from Kokan should also be repealed.
Komisjoni otsus 2006/37/EÜ, millega kiideti heaks kehtiv hinnakohustus seoses sulfaniilhappe impordiga tootjalt Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt.
Taking into consideration that the recovery of the Union industry is recent, the Commission, if it receives a request of the Union producer in that sense, will monitor the imports of the product concerned.
Ltd.
The monitoring will be limited to a period of two years after the publication of this Regulation.
(India), tunnistatakse kehtetuks.
The maintenance of the measures provided for in this Regulation against China and the repeal of measures against India are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation,
Kui ei ole sätestatud teisiti, kohaldatakse kehtivaid tollimaksusätteid.
A definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulhpanilic acid currently falling within CN code ex29214200 (TARIC code 2921420060) originating the People's Republic of China is hereby imposed.
Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Union frontier price, before duty, for the products described in paragraph 1, shall be as follows:
Brüssel, 17. detsember 2014
Country
Komisjoni nimel
Definitive duty (%)
president
The People's Republic of China
ELT L 343, 22.12.2009, lk 5.
The definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid currently falling within CN code ex29214200 (TARIC code 2921420060) originating in India is hereby repealed and the proceedings concerning these imports is terminated.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1339/2002, 22. juuli 2002, millega kehtestatakse Hiina Vabariigist ja Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks ja nõutakse lõplikult sisse kõnealuse impordi suhtes kehtestatud ajutine tollimaks (EÜT L 196, 25.7.2002, lk 11).
The Commission Decision 2006/37/EC accepting the undertaking currently in force concerning imports of sulphanilic acid from Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1338/2002, 22. juuli 2002, Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes lõpliku tasakaalustava tollimaksu kehtestamise ja ajutise tasakaalustava tollimaksu lõpliku sissenõudmise kohta (EÜT L 196, 25.7.2002, lk 1).
Ltd (India) is hereby repealed.
Commission Decision 2002/611/EC of 12 July 2002 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India (EÜT L 196, 25.7.2002, lk 36).
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 236/2004, 10. veebruar 2004, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1339/2002, millega kehtestatakse Hiina Rahvavabariigist ja Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks ja nõutakse lõplikult sisse kõnealuse impordi suhtes kehtestatud ajutine tollimaks (ELT L 40, 12.2.2004, lk 17).
Article 2
Commission Decision 2004/255/EC of 17 March 2004 repealing Decision 2002/611/EC accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India (ELT L 80, 18.3.2004, lk 29).
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisjoni otsus 2006/37/EÜ, 5. detsember 2005, millega kiidetakse heaks seoses Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe importi käsitleva dumpingu- ja subsiidiumivastase menetlusega pakutud kohustus (ELT L 22, 26.1.2006, lk 52).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 123/2006, 23. jaanuar 2006, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1338/2002, millega kehtestatakse lõplik tasakaalustav tollimaks Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes, ning määrust (EÜ) nr 1339/2002, millega kehtestatakse muu hulgas Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks (ELT L 22, 26.1.2006, lk 5).
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2014.
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1000/2008, 13. oktoober 2008, millega pärast aegumise läbivaatamist vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 384/96 artikli 11 lõikele 2 kehtestatakse Hiina Rahvavabariigist ja Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks (ELT L 275, 16.10.2008, lk 1).
For the Commission
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1010/2008, 13. oktoober 2008, millega pärast aegumise läbivaatamist vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 2026/97 artiklile 18 ja osalist vahepealset läbivaatamist vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 2026/97 artiklile 19 kehtestatakse Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes lõplik tasakaalustav tollimaks ning muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1000/2008, millega pärast aegumise läbivaatamist vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 384/96 artikli 11 lõikele 2 kehtestatakse lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks Hiina Rahvavabariigist ja Indiast pärineva sulfaniilhappe impordi suhtes (ELT L 276, 17.10.2008, lk 3).
The President
ELT C 28, 30.1.2013, lk 1.
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
ELT C 300, 16.10.2013, lk 1.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 of 22 July 2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People's Republic of China and India (OJ L 196, 25.7.2002, p. 11).
ELT C 300, 16.10.2013, lk 5.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 of 22 July 2002 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional countervailing duty imposed on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India (OJ L 196, 25.7.2002, p. 1).
Nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 597/2009, 11. juuni 2009, kaitse kohta subsideeritud impordi eest riikidest, mis ei ole Euroopa Ühenduse liikmed (ELT L 188, 18.7.2009, lk 93).
Commission Decision 2002/611/EC of 12 July 2002 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India (OJ L 196, 25.7.2002, p. 36).
Pärast järelduste teatavakstegemist nõudis liidu tootja, et vaatlusalustest riikidest pärit sulfaniilhappe impordi mahud ja väärtused avalikustataks ka vahemikena, kuna indekseeritud andmete põhjal oli keeruline hinnata arvandmete tegelikku (absoluutset) arengut ning mõista komisjoni sellekohaseid järeldusi.
Council Regulation (EC) No 236/2004 of 10 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People's Republic of China and India (OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 17).
On olemas kaks sulfaniilhappe klassi, mis määratletakse vastavalt nende puhtusastmele:
Commission Decision 2004/255/EC of 17 March 2004 repealing Decision 2002/611/EC accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India (OJ L 80, 18.3.2004, p. 29).
tehniline klass ja puhastatud klass.
Commission Decision 2006/37/EC of 5 December 2005 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India (OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p. 52).
Liidu tootmisharu aastalõpu toodanguvarud tõusid järsult 2011. aastal, näidates hiljem langustendentsi, kuid säilitades läbivaatamisega seotud uurimisperioodil siiski 71 % võrra kõrgema taseme kui 2010. aastal.