natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The respective agreements in all cases were concluded on the same dates.
Itaalia aga selgitas, et Ryanairi arveandmed tasude kohta vastavad tasudele, mis ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL avaldas kõigi lennujaamateenuste kohta, erandiks olid vaid käitlustasud.
Second, the preambles of the 2006 and 2010 marketing agreements with AMS state that the ‘website www.ryanair.com provides a unique opportunity for targeting millions of potential Ryanair passengers and presents extensive information about airports, cities and regions that Ryanair operates to’.
Ryanairile tehti käitlustasude puhul allahindlust, mis peegeldab lennuettevõtja toimingute mahtu lennujaamas ja mis nähtub ka lennujaamateenuste lepingutest.
This indicates that the purpose of the marketing agreement is not generally to promote Sardinia, but more specifically to maximise ticket sales for the Ryanair destination Alghero.
Täiendavate lennundustulude tuletamiseks täiendas So.Ge.A.AL lennujaamateenuste lepingutest pärinevat teavet Ryanairi reisijate ja lendude kohta äriplaanidest pärit teabega.
Indeed, the preambles state that So.Ge.A.AL is to target Ryanair passengers in order to promote tourism and business opportunities in the region, and in particular Alghero airport as a destination.
2000., 2002. ja 2003. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingutes ei nähtud ette ühtegi liiklusprognoosi.
Third, the marketing agreements with AMS state in their first section, entitled ‘Purpose of the Agreement’, that they are ‘rooted in the Ryanair's commitment to operate on routes between Alghero and EU destinations’ (the 2006 agreement mentions London-Stansted, Barcelona Gerona, Frankfurt Hahn, Pisa, Liverpool and Rome).
Seega on 2000., 2002. ja 2003. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingute analüüse toetavad liiklusprognoosid tuletatud ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL 2000. aasta äriplaanist, mis sisaldas prognoose Ryanairi liiklusmahtude kohta lennujaamas.
This wording establishes an unambiguous direct link between the airport service agreements and the marketing agreements in the sense that one would not have been concluded without the other.
Kuigi 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingutes sätestati Ryanairi puhul teatavad liiklusmahtude eesmärgid, selgitas Itaalia, et need eesmärgid ei peegeldanud ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL ootusi Ryanairi liiklusmahtude üldise taseme kohta lennujaamas.
The marketing agreements are based on the conclusion of the airport services agreements and the services provided by Ryanair.
Pigem arvas So.Ge.A.AL, et need eesmärgid kujutasid endast Ryanairi minimaalseid lepingulisi kohustusi.
Fourth, the marketing agreements state in their preamble that So.Ge.A.AL has decided to ‘actively promote the city of Alghero and the region as a holiday destination for international air travellers and also as an attractive business centre.’
Seega põhinesid liiklusprognoosid 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingute puhul äriplaanidel, mille ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL oli koostanud 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingute sõlmimisele lähimal ajahetkel (täpsemalt põhinesid liiklusprognoosid ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL 2004. ja 2009. aasta äriplaanidel).
This is an indication that the conclusion of the marketing agreements has as its primary and specific purpose to promote specifically Alghero airport and the surrounding region and is therefore linked to the conclusion of the airport services agreement by Ryanair.
Arvestades seda, et ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL äriplaanid ei hõlma lennuettevõtjatega sõlmitud lepingute kehtivuse kogu ajavahemikku, on kasumlikkuse analüüsi laiendamiseks Ryanairi lepingute kogu kehtivusajale töötatud kahes etapis välja lennuliikluse (edasi-tagasilennud) ja reisijate väljumiste prognoosid, et hõlmata äriplaanidega hõlmamata aastaid.
Fifth, the marketing agreements can be terminated immediately by So.Ge.A.AL in the event that Ryanair stops operating the abovementioned routes.
Esiteks prognoositi Ryanairi reiside arvu; selleks ajakohastati äriplaanides sisalduva viimase aasta reiside arvu ning eeldati, et reiside arvu aastane kasv on 19 %.
This demonstrates again that the marketing agreements and the ASAs are inseparably linked.
Lennundusvälised tulud
Finally, the Commission notes that it is clear from the analysis of So.Ge.A.AL's 2000 annual report that the marketing support had been asked by Ryanair as a condition for the operation of the London route at the time the 2000 ASA was entered into.
Lennundusväliste tulude prognoosid põhinevad iga lennujaamateenuste lepingu allkirjastamisele lähimal ajahetkel ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL koostatud äriplaanidel, nagu on esitatud tabelis 9:
This reading is also confirmed by the fact that the marketing support costs were considered by So.Ge.A.AL an operational cost of the Ryanair route, rather than an investment in brand development as claimed by Ryanair and AMS.
Tabel 9
In conclusion, the marketing service agreements concluded by So.Ge.A.AL and AMS are indivisibly linked to the ASAs signed by Ryanair and So.Ge.A.AL.
Eeldatavate lennundusväliste tulude prognoosid
The considerations in recitals 421 to 426 demonstrate that without the ASAs, the marketing services agreements would not have been concluded.
Lennundusvälised tulud väljuva reisija kohta
For those reasons, the Commission concludes that the ASAs and the marketing services agreements are not severable and therefore finds it necessary to analyse each marketing service agreement together with the ASA that was concluded at the same time, with a view to determining whether such a transaction constitutes State aid.
Allikas
On the benefits that an MEO could have expected to gain from marketing service agreements and the price that it would have been willing to pay for these services
2000. aasta äriplaan
For the purpose of application of the MEO test in this case the conduct of RAS and So.Ge.A.AL has to be compared with that of a prudent MEO entrusted with the management of the Alghero airport, guided by profitability prospects.
2004. aasta äriplaan
This assessment should leave aside any positive repercussions on the economy of the region in which the airport is located, since the Court has clarified that the relevant question for applying the MEO test is whether ‘in similar circumstances a private shareholder, having regard to the foreseeability of obtaining a return and leaving aside all social, regional-policy and sectoral considerations, would have subscribed the capital in question’ [106].
2009. aasta äriplaan
When analysing the measures in question, it is necessary to examine the benefits that this hypothetical MEO, motivated by the prospect of profits, could gain from purchasing marketing services.
Iga lennujaamateenuste lepingu ajavahemiku puhul, mis ei ole vastavate äriplaanidega hõlmatud, on viimane saadaolev prognoos lennundusväliste tulude kohta viidud edasi igasse aastasse kuni lepingu lõpuni.
This analysis should not take into account the general impact of such services on tourism and the region's economic performance.
Lisakulud
Only the impact of those services on the airport's profitability should be taken into account, as this would be the only concern for a hypothetical MEO.
Kuna lennujaamateenuste lepingute allkirjastamise ajal puudus teave Ryanairi teenindamisega seotud eeldatavate lisakulude kohta, hindas Itaalia lisakulusid lennujaama tegevuskulude ja reisijate arvu suhte põhjal.
Marketing services have in principle the potential to stimulate passenger traffic on the air routes covered by marketing service agreements and the ASAs, as the marketing services are designed to promote those air routes.
Selgitamaks välja, kuidas tegevuskulud varieeruvad reisijate arvu muutumise korral, kasutati regressioonimeetodit, et hinnata lisakulusid, mida So.Ge.A.AL võinuks Ryanairiga lennujaamateenuste lepingute allkirjastamise ajal põhjendatult eeldada.
Although this impact will mainly benefit the airline concerned, it may also be of benefit to the airport manager.
Esimese etapina tehti regressioonanalüüs, et selgitada välja lennujaama reisijate arvu muutuse mõju lennujaama tegevuskuludele.
In addition, an increase in passenger traffic may lead to an increase in revenues generated by certain airport charges for the airport manager, as well as an increase in non-aeronautical revenues, in particular from car parks, restaurants and other businesses located at the airport, and whose turnover fully or partly accrue to the airport manager.
Teise etapina tuletati Ryanairi lepingutest tulenevate võimalike täiendavate tegevuskulude hinnang esimese etapi tulemustest, kombineerituna Ryanairi reisijate arvu prognoosidega.
Therefore, an MEO operating Alghero airport instead of So.Ge.A.AL and RAS would have taken this possible positive effect into account when considering entering into a marketing service agreement and the corresponding ASA.
Kaaluti järgmisi komponente:
The MEO would have taken into account the impact of the air route in question on future revenues and costs by, in this case, estimating the increase in the number of passengers using those routes, which would have reflected the possible positive effect of marketing services in the form of a higher expected load ratio (or load factor) [107] for those air routes.
täiendavad personalikulud;
Moreover, this effect would have been evaluated for the entire term of operation of the air routes in question, as set out in the airport service agreement and the marketing service agreement.
täiendavad kaupade ja teenuste, julgestuse, varude ja materjalide kulud;
The Commission agrees with Ryanair on this issue, namely that marketing service agreements do not just generate costs for the airport manager, they can also be expected to bring benefits with them.
uute liinide hinnastiimulid, turundus- ja/või tulemustasud Ryanairile või AMSile;
Ryanair supports this argument, in particular in its study of 17 January 2014.
Ryanairi lepingutega lisanduvate personalikulude hinnangute tuletamiseks pärast 2006. aastat tehti lennujaama personali koondkulude andmete põhjal statistiline analüüs, et määrata kindlaks see osa kuludest, mis varieerus koos reisijate arvu muutustega [111].
The study is based on the theory that marketing services acquired by an airport manager will help to improve the airport's brand image and, as a result, to sustainably increase the number of passengers using this airport and not just the numbers on the air routes covered by the marketing service agreement and the airport service agreement for the term of operation set out in these agreements.
Seejärel tuletati täiendavate personalikulude hinnang regressioonitulemustest, kombineerituna Ryanairi reisijate hinnangulise arvuga.
In particular, Ryanair argued in its study that these marketing services will have sustainable positive effects on passenger traffic in the airport even after the marketing service agreement has expired.
Muud kulud: samamoodi tehti regressioonanalüüs kaupade ja materjalide [112], teenuste [113], julgestuse, varude lisakulude kohta, sest neid kulusid polnud äriplaanides nimetatud.
This view is shared by Italy and the benefits of the marketing services have been taken into consideration in the reconstructed ex ante profitability analysis of the agreements with Ryanair as summarised in Table 8 below.
Ryanairile võimaldatavad uute liinide soodustused, makstavad turundus- ja/või tulemustasud on esitatud lennujaama kuludena.
It should first be noted that there is nothing to suggest that, when the marketing service agreements covered by the formal investigation procedure were entered into, the airport manager or RAS ever considered, still less quantified, the marketing service agreements' possible beneficial effects on air routes additional to those covered by the agreements, or the possibility of such effects continuing after the agreements had expired.
Täiendavad kontsessioonikulud [114] põhinevad lennujaama ühikukuludel, mis on korrutatud Ryanairi liiklusprognoosidega.
In addition, the sustainable nature of those effects cannot be assessed based on the information available.
Itaalia sõnul ei olnud ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL eesmärk katta uue reisiterminali kulud Ryanairi makstavate tasudega.
It is possible that advertising Alghero airport and the Sardinian region on Ryanair's internet site may have encouraged people visiting this site to buy Ryanair tickets to Alghero airport as long as the advertising was posted or just thereafter.
Teisisõnu ei saa uue terminaliga seotud investeerimiskulusid seostada ühegi Ryanairi lepinguga ning seega ei ole need osa lisakuludest.
An advertising campaign is more likely to have a sustainable effect when the promotional activities involve one or more advertising media to which the consumers are regularly exposed over a given period.
Samal ajal oli jääkväärtust arvestatud lennujaama tuluna, et võtta seda arvesse turunduslepingute ja lennujaamateenuste lepingute tuluna, mis Itaalia arvates kestavad koguni pärast turunduslepingute lõppemist.
For example, an advertising campaign involving general TV and radio stations, popular internet sites and/or various advertising posters displayed outside or inside public places could have a sustainable effect if consumers are regularly exposed to these media.
Jääkväärtus arvutati samal meetodil, mida kasutas Ryanair ja mida on üksikasjalikult kirjeldatud põhjendustes 443–446.
However, promotional activities limited to just Ryanair's internet site are highly unlikely to have an effect that lasts much past the end of the promotion.
Tabelis 10 esitatakse nende rahavoogude NPV [115], mida oleks võinud eeldada seoses Ryanairi lepingutega ja mille aluseks on põhjendustes 459–471 üksikasjalikult kirjeldatud prognoosid.
In fact, it is very likely that most people do not visit Ryanair's internet site frequently enough for the advertising there alone to leave them with a clear recollection of the region concerned.
Tabel 10
Firstly, under the terms of the marketing service agreements, the promotion of Alghero and the Sardinian region on the homepage of the Ryanair internet site was limited to one paragraph of 150 words under ‘Top Five Things To Do’ on the Alghero destination page and the presence of a link on the www.ryanair.com homepage leading to a site made available by So.Ge.A.AL.
NPV lepingu kestuse ajal (miljonit eurot) [116]
Thus, even if the marketing services did increase passenger traffic on the air routes covered by the marketing service agreements for their period of implementation, it is very likely that this effect was zero or negligible after this term.
[3–6]
It also follows from the Ryanair studies of 17 and 31 January 2014 that the generation of benefits going beyond the air routes covered by these agreements or lasting after the term of operation for these routes, as set out in the marketing service agreements and airport service agreements, was extremely uncertain and could not be quantified with a degree of reliability that would be considered sufficient by a prudent MEO.
[6–9]
Thus, for example, according to the study of 17 January 2014, ‘future incremental profits beyond the scheduled expiry of the airport service agreement are inherently uncertain’.
1. jaanuar 2010 – 31. detsember 2013
Moreover, this study suggests two methods for evaluating a priori the positive effects of marketing service agreements: a ‘cash flow’ methodology and a ‘capitalisation’ methodology.
[9–12]
The ‘cash flow’ methodology involves evaluating the benefits of marketing service agreements and airport service agreements by assessing the future revenues which may be generated by the airport manager through marketing services and the airport service agreement, minus corresponding costs.
Komisjon võtab teadmiseks, et 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingute kasumlikkuse analüüsi puhul kaalus Itaalia 2006. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu kehtivusajaks kümmet aastat ning 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu kehtivusajaks üheksat aastat ja mitte ajavahemikku, mil lepinguid pidi esialgu kohaldatama, vastavalt siis viis ja neli aastat.
In the ‘capitalisation’ methodology, improvement of the brand image of the airport through marketing services is treated as an intangible asset, acquired for the price laid down in the marketing service agreements.
Itaalia aga esitas komisjonile ka selle kasumlikkuse analüüsi tulemused, milles võeti arvesse 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu esialgset kestust, nagu on nendes lepingutes rangelt määratletud.
However, the study of 17 January 2014 highlights the major difficulties presented by the ‘capitalisation’ approach and shows that the results produced by this method may be unreliable; it suggests that the ‘cash flow’ approach would be better.
Oma seisukoha kaitsmiseks väitis Itaalia, et iga lepingu allkirjastamisel Ryanairiga olid ettevõtjal So.Ge.A.AL põhjendatud ootused nende pikendamiseks sarnastel tingimustel.
In particular, the study finds that ‘the capitalisation approach should only take into account the proportion of marketing expenditure that is attributable to the intangible asset base of an airport.
Eelkõige – tuginedes 2006. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu sõnaselgele sättele, et lepingut saab pikendada täiendavaks viieaastaseks tähtajaks, 1. jaanuarini 2016 –, eeldas So.Ge.A.AL kõnealuse lepingu pikendamist sarnastel tingimustel.
However, it may be difficult to identify the proportion of marketing expenditure that is targeted towards generating expected future revenues for the airport (namely an investment in the intangible asset base of the airport) as opposed to generating current revenues for the airport.’
Samamoodi eeldati, et 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste leping hõlmab ajavahemikku 1. jaanuarist 2010 kuni 31. detsembrini 2013, võimalusega pikendada lennujaamateenuste lepingut täiendavaks viieaastaseks tähtajaks, 31. detsembrini 2018.
It also stresses that ‘in order to implement the capitalisation-based approach, it is necessary to estimate the average length of time that an airport would be able to retain a customer due to the AMS marketing campaign.
Komisjon ei saa selle väitega nõustuda.
In practice, it would be very difficult to estimate the average period of customer retention following an AMS campaign due to insufficient data.’
Esiteks ei ole 2006. ega 2010. aasta lepinguga ette nähtud selle automaatset pikenemist pärast lepingu täieliku kehtivusaja lõppu.
The study of 31 January 2014 proposes a practical application of the ‘cash flow’ approach.
Nimetatud säte ei ole Ryanairile tõepoolest õiguslikult siduv ega kohusta teda sõlmima lennujaama käitajaga uut lepingut ning selles ei ole ka ette nähud kindlust, et kumbki pool täidab kõnealuseid tingimusi, pidades eelkõige silmas märkimisväärset ebakindlust, mis seondus sel ajal lennujaama käitajale ulatusliku kontsessiooni andmisega.
Under this approach, the benefits of marketing service agreements and airport service agreements which last even after the marketing service agreement has expired are expressed as a ‘terminal value’ that is calculated on the agreement's expiry date.
Komisjon leiab, et 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu puhul on selle pikendamine veelgi ebakindlam.
The terminal value is calculated from the airport's incremental profits (net of AMS payments) in the last year of the ASA, adjusted to take into account the growth rate for the air transport market in Europe and the probability factor designed to reflect the airport service agreement's and marketing service agreement's capacities to contribute to the airport's profits after they have expired.
Artikkel 2 – „Kehtivusaeg” on järgmine: „lepingut võib pikendada täiendavaks viieaastaseks kehtivusajaks käesolevas lepingus sätestatud tingimustel või poolte muudetud tingimustel, eeldusel, et mõlemad pooled annavad kirjaliku nõusoleku vähemalt kuus kuud enne esialgse kehtivusaja lõppemist. […] Käesoleva lepingu mis tahes muu pikendamise räägivad pooled läbi vähemalt kuus kuud enne täiendava kehtivusaja lõppemist”.
The same method of calculating the ‘terminal value’ has been proposed by Italy in the 2014 MEOP report (see recital 471).
Seega on selge, et lepingu mis tahes pikendamine oleks tulnud poolte vahel läbi rääkida ning seega ei saanud So.Ge.A.AL seda 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu allkirjastamise ajal eeldada.
The study of 31 January 2014 suggests a probability factor of 30 %, which it considers prudent.
Sel ajal oli Ryanair seadnud oma lendude jätkamise tingimuseks Alghero lennujaamast täiendava lepingu sõlmimise.
However, the study does not provide any serious evidence for this factor, neither quantitatively nor qualitatively.
Tegelikult selgub ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL juhatuse 7. juuli 2009. aasta, 9. septembri 2009. aasta ja 23. veebruari 2010. aasta koosoleku protokollidest, mille Itaalia esitas, et lennujaama käitaja otsuses siiski allkirjastada viieks aastaks uus lennujaamateenuste leping Ryanairiga võeti arvesse asjaolu, et selles lepingus ei nähtud ette karistusi lepingu ennetähtaegse lõpetamise eest.
It does not base itself on any facts relating to Ryanair's activities, air transport markets or airport services to substantiate this rate of 30 %.
oli Ryanair avaldanud survet sõlmida täiendav leping, mille „tulemusel ühisturunduse osamaksete väärtus kindlasti suureneb”.
It does not establish any link between this rate and the factors that it mentions in passing (prominence, strong brand, network externalities and repeat passengers) and that are supposed to extend the benefits of the airport service agreement and market service agreement beyond their expiry dates.
Kui seda lepingut kohe ei allkirjastata, lõpetab lennuettevõtja kõik oma Alghero lennujaamast lähtuvad liinid [117];arutati dokumenti, milles kirjeldatakse Ryanairiga sõlmitud lepingute muutumist ning suhete praegust olukorda lennuettevõtjaga ja esitatakse Ryanairi ettekujutus võimalike järgmiste sammude kohta, muu hulgas ka ELi-siseste lendude tühistamine või nende sageduse vähendamine ja nende asendamine riiklike liinidega [118];juhatus küsis Ryanairi lepinguliste suhetega seoses läbirääkimiste varu kohta, kui seda on, arvestades et aktsionärid ei olnud andnud juhatusele volitusi lõpetada leping lennuettevõtjaga [119].(480) Ettevõtja So.Ge.A.AL aktsionäride 26. oktoobri 2001. aasta üldkoosoleku protokollist nähtub, et ettevõtja kaalus 2000. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu lõpetamist enne selle kehtivusaja lõppu ning see põhjustas aktsionäride seas pikki vaidlusi.
Finally, it does not in any way base itself on the specific content of marketing services provided for in the various agreements with AMS when analysing to what extent these services could influence the factors mentioned in recital 444.
Selle alusel järeldab komisjon, et 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingute sõlmimisel Ryanairiga ei saanud So.Ge.A.AL eeldada, et neid lepinguid pikendatakse, või vähemalt ei saanud eeldada, et neid pikendatakse samadel lepingutingimustel.
Moreover, it does not prove that there is any likelihood that, on expiry of the ASA and the marketing service agreement, the profits generated by those agreements for the airport manager in the final year of their application will continue in the future.
Seetõttu järeldab komisjon, et 2006. ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste kasumlikkuse analüüsiks tuleks arvesse võtta üksnes lennujaamateenuste lepingus sätestatud ajavahemikku, nimelt 2006. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu puhul viis aastat ja 2010. aasta lennujaamateenuste lepingu puhul neli aastat (tabelis 10 esitatud NPVd arvutati lepingu esialgse kestuse alusel, nagu on sätestatud lennujaamateenuste lepingutes).
A ‘terminal value’ calculated using the method suggested by Ryanair and Italy would therefore be highly unlikely to be taken into account by a prudent MEO when deciding whether or not to enter into an agreement.
2006. aasta lennujaamateenuste leping ja turundusteenuste leping allkirjastati 3. aprillil 2006, kuid neid kohaldati tagasiulatuvalt alates 1. jaanuarist 2006;