natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The third plot of land was sold for a price of […].
Kättesaadav teave näitab, et 2007. aasta tasumäärade tulemusel kerkisid lennujaama tulud järk-järgult ([…] 2007. aastal kuni […] 2010. aastal).
Germany has provided an evaluation of the plots of land that were transferred in 2002.
Komisjon märgib seejärel, et lennujaama ja lennuettevõtjate kokkuleppe hindamisel tuleb ka arvesse võtta, mil määral võib kokkuleppeid pidada osaks vähemalt pikaajalises perspektiivis kasumlikkuseni viiva üleüldise strateegia rakendamisest.
According to this evaluation, the transferred plots outside the original fence had a value of […]; the plots of land on the premises of the airport had a value of […].
Sellega seoses peab komisjon võtma arvesse kättesaadavaid faktilisi tõendeid ja arengut, mida võis mõistlikkuse piires oodata ajal, mis 2007. aasta tasumäärad kehtestati, eelkõige valitsevaid turutingimusi, konkreetsemalt õhutranspordi liberaliseerimisest tekkinud turumuutused, odavlennuettevõtjate ja teiste punktist punkti lendavate lennuettevõtjate turule sisenemine ja nende areng, lennujaamatööstuse organisatsioonilise ja majandusliku ülesehituse muutused ning lennujaamade ülesannete mitmekesisuse ja keerukuse aste, lennuettevõtjate ja lennujaamade vahelise konkurentsi edendamine, majanduskeskkonna ebakindlus, mis tuleneb valitsevate turutingimuste muutustest, või majanduskeskkonna muu ebakindlus, millega tuleb arvestada.
It claims that this evaluation can be used to also determine the value of the plot sold in 2004.
Komisjon märgib, et nagu põhjenduses 335 kirjeldatud, viisid mitmed põhjused (nagu uus konkurents Zweibrückeniga pärast 2006. aastat ja TUIFly lahkumine 2006. aasta lõpus) Saarbrückeni lennujaama mõttele, et läbivaadatud soodustusi pakkuvad tasumäärad on vajalik samm oma tulevase elujõulisuse ja kasumlikkuse tagamisel.
On that basis, Germany estimated that the value of the plot sold in 2004 amounted to […] at the time of the transaction, which equals the sales price that FSBesitzG paid.
Komisjon märgib viimaks, et lennujaamataristu on kõigile lennuettevõtjatele avatud, mitte mõeldud konkreetsele ettevõtjale.
In this regard, the Commission first notes that the evaluation referred to by Germany has not been done by an independent expert, but in house, by the unit in the Saarland’s Ministry of finance responsible for sale of land.
Nende kaalutluste valguses, nõustudes, et tegevuse laiendamisega ei kaasne praktiliselt mitte mingeid täiendavaid kulusid, kuid sellega seoses võib oodata täiendava tulu tootmist, nõustub komisjon, et Saarbrückeni lennujaam käitus 2007. aasta soodustusi sisaldavaid tasumäärasid kehtestades nagu turumajanduse tingimustes tegutsev ettevõtja.
Moreover, Germany has not provided any explanation on how it arrived at its conclusion.
Seega ei andnud kõnealune meede asjaomastele lennuettevõtjatele majanduslikku eelist.
In particular, it remained unclear which plots of land were located on the premises and which ones outside the premises of the airport.
Turustamisleping Air Berliniga
The Commission can therefore not exclude that the price paid was below market value and thus conferred an advantage to FSBesitzG.
Saksamaa esitas FSG tehtud analüüsi lepingu kasumlikkuse kohta, mida võis oodata lepingu sõlmimise ajal.
As only FSBesitzG benefited from the three transfers, it must also be considered that they were selective in nature.
Saksamaa teatas, et kui turustamisega seotud otsemaksed välja jätta, siis ei tekitanud sageduste suurendamine mitte mingeid lisakulusid lennujaama jaoks, kes võib täiendavat liiklust teenindada olemasoleva taristu ja personaliga.
Finally, by the same token as in recitals 218 to 225, the transfers are liable to distort competition and have an effect on trade.
Analüüs põhines järgmistel ootustel.
Accordingly, the transfer of three plots of land amounted to State aid.
Tabel 10
The Commission furthermore considers that since the aid related to the free transfer of fixed capital assets, the aid must be qualified as investment aid.
Air Berliniga sõlmitud turustamislepingu eeldatav kasumlikkus
The investment aid was used to allow for the extension of runway end safety areas (RESA).
Täiendavad tulud
As set out in Section 5.1.5.3, this investment was done with a view to keeping the airport fully operational, thereby enhancing regional development.
Täiendavad kulud
The Commission considers that the investment aid in the form of a transfer of land also fulfils all the other conditions for establishing compatibility pursuant to point 61 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines, since the reasons set out in Section 5.1.5.3 equally apply.
Tulemus
It is therefore concluded that the investment aid in the form of the transfer of land is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Kuigi FSG läbiviidud ja Saksamaa esitatud eeluuringus ei kajastunud lepingu sõlmimise päevast edasised maksed, on selge, et lepingust oodati kasumlikkust.
The Commission notes that the Land Saarland guaranteed loans to FSBesitzG on three occasions without receiving any remuneration.
Saksamaa kinnitas, et praeguseni ei ole turustamislepingus ette nähtud lendude sageduste suurendamised nõudnud uue personali värbamist või konkreetsete investeeringute tegemist.
However, it also notes that the guarantees were all granted before the year 2000.
Üldjoontes on lennujaama ootused täitunud ja leping on olnud kasumlik.
As FSBesitzG could only be considered to constitute an undertaking for the purposes of Article 107(1) of the Treaty from the year 2000 onwards, the Commission finds that the guarantees did not grant an advantage to an undertaking and therefore do not amount to State aid.
Seoses sellega esitas Saksamaa lepinguperioodi esimese 8 kuu (2011. aasta aprillist kuni 2012. aasta jaanuarini) kasumil põhinevad prognoosid kogu lepingu kestuse ajaks; nende järgi näib leping olevat kasumlik.
As regards the comfort letters provided to vh Saar, the Commission recalls its previous conclusion in recital 203 that vh Saar uses the funding it received to fulfil its financing obligations toward Saarbrücken Airport.
Olles analüüsinud lepingut ja FSG ootusi lepingu sõlmimise ajal, on komisjon rahul, et leping on kaasa aidanud Saarbrückeni lennujaama kasumlikkusele ning oodatavad lisatulud olid suuremad kui oodatavad lisakulud.
The loans taken out by vh Saar following the comfort letters were also passed on to Saarbrücken Airport.
Kuna leping oli kooskõlas turumajanduse tingimustes tegutseva ettevõtja põhimõttega, siis ei andnud see Air Berlinile eelist.
It can therefore be concluded that the advantage contained in these letters did not benefit vh Saar, but that the advantage therein, if any, was passed on to the Airport.
Leides, et 2007. aasta tasumäärad ja neis sisaldunud soodustused ning Air Berlini ja Saarbrückeni lennujaama 2011. aasta turustamisleping ei andnud vastavatele lennuettevõtjatele eelist, siis ei ole vaja hinnata muid abi olemasolu kriteeriume.
As to the advantage to the airport, the loans secured by the comfort letters were passed on to finance investments in infrastructure.
Võib järeldada, et kõnealustele lennuettevõtjatele ei eraldatud riigiabi.
If the comfort letters involved aid, it would thus be compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty for the reasons set out in Section 5.1.5.3.
Kuna pankrotimenetluse tulemused ei ole selged, siis ei ole komisjonil võimalik võtta praegu seisukohta selles kohta, kas Cirrus AirLinesile tehtud maksete uurimine võib muutuda kasutuks.
The Commission already determined, in recital 181, that FSBG was an undertaking for the purposes of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Seega ei käsitleta käesolevas otsuses Cirrus Airlinesile tehtud makseid.
It therefore only needs to be assessed whether the lease contracts granted an advantage to FSBG, whether such an advantage was granted from State resources, and whether it distorted competition and affected trade between Member States.
Seega on komisjon jõudnud järeldusele, et FSBesitzG/FSG rahastamine kapitalisüstide kaudu, et katta aastatel 2000–2012 kantud kahjusid, kujutab endast riigiabi niivõrd, kuivõrd see hõlmas tegevust, mis ei kuulunud avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannete hulka.
Distinction between existing and new aid
Abi puhul on alates 1. juunist 2007 tegemist uue abiga.
The Commission first observes that a distinction needs to be drawn between the lease contract that was concluded on 7 July 1997 and effective until 1 July 2006 (‘the 1997 contract’), and the contract that was effective as from 1 July 2006 onwards (‘the 2006 contract’).
Kruntide tasuta või turuhinnast madalama hinnaga üleandmine aastatel 2002, 2003 ja 2004 kujutab endast riigiabi niivõrd, kuivõrd see hõlmas tegevust, mis ei kuulunud avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannete hulka.
As was stressed above, the construction and operation of an airport was not considered to constitute an economic activity until the year 2000, with the consequence that any aid scheme put into place before that date would, if considered to amount to State aid, constitute existing aid after that date (see Section 5.1.2).
Abi on siseturuga kokkusobiv investeeringuteks ettenähtud abina 2005. aasta lennundussuuniste tähenduses.
Hence, it is not necessary to investigate further whether the 1997 contract (which foresaw fixed annual lease payments) did in fact amount to aid, given it would in any event have to be qualified as existing aid.
Laenude tagatised anti kõik enne 2000. aastat ja seega ei kujuta need endast riigiabi.
On the other hand, the conclusion of a new lease contract by FSBG in 2006 with changed conditions for determining the annual lease to be paid (in particular, the introduction of a new price element, namely the transfer of a certain percentage of the annual profit of FSBG) cannot be considered as merely a ‘modification of a purely formal or administrative nature which cannot affect the evaluation of the compatibility of the aid measure with the common market’.
Kinnituskirjade eelis, kui see olemas oli, anti vh Saari poolt edasi FSBesitzG/FSG-le.
The 2006 contract can therefore not, if amounting to State aid, be considered as existing aid, but would rather constitute new aid.
2006. aasta rendileping sisaldas FSBG jaoks riigiabi, mis oli siseturuga kokkusobiv tegevusabi 2014. aasta lennundussuuniste tähenduses.
The 2006 contract was concluded between FSBesitzG and FSBG.
2007. aasta tasumäärade ja Air Berliniga sõlmitud turustamislepingu kaudu ei antud lennuettevõtjatele riigiabi.
FSBesitzG was (indirectly) 100 % owned by the State, which was hence in a position to exercise control over the company.
Cirrus Airlinesile antud stardiabi käesolevas otsuses ei käsitleta.
As to the imputability, the Commission notes that according to the statute of FSBesitzG the members of the supervisory board of FSBesitzG are appointed by the government of Saarland and that the president is appointed by the Ministry responsible for aviation.
ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE:
The conclusion of the 2006 contract needed the consent of the supervisory board, which represents the government of the Saarland.
Artikkel 1
The Commission can therefore conclude that the measure is imputable to the State.
Riigiabi, mida Saksamaa on andnud Saarbrückeni lennujaamale, on siseturuga kokkusobiv Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c tähenduses.
Economic Advantage
Meetmed, mida Saksamaa on rakendanud lennuettevõtjate suhtes (2007. aasta tasumäärad, Air Berliniga sõlmitud turustamisleping), ei kujuta endast riigiabi Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 tähenduses:
It is therefore necessary to analyse whether a prudent MEO, interested in making a reasonable profit, would have concluded the 2006 contract.
Brüssel, 1. oktoober 2014
The Commission observes that FSBesitzG consistently incurred losses at least since the year 2000 (see Table 3).
Komisjoni nimel
Considering that the lease contract with FSBG was virtually its only source of income (apart from the yearly loss cover received from vh Saar), it would appear that a reasonable MEO being in the place of FSBesitzG would have attempted to cover its own costs from the income generated from this lease contract.
Joaquín Almunia
The costs incurred by FSBesitzG were higher than the income it generated by leasing the airport to FSBG.
Alates 1. detsembrist 2009 muutusid EÜ asutamislepingu artiklid 87 ja 88 vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu („ELi toimimise leping”) artikliteks 107 ja 108.
It also does not appear that FSBesitzG was, in concluding the 2006 contract, pursuing a specific long–term profitability strategy.
Sätted on sisult identsed.
In light of these considerations, the conclusion of the 2006 contract cannot be considered as being in line with the MEO principle and it therefore conferred an advantage to FSBG.
Käesolevas otsuses tuleb viiteid Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklitele 107 ja 108 käsitada vajaduse korral vastavalt viidetena EÜ asutamislepingu artiklitele 87 ja 88.
As the 2006 contract only benefitted FSBG, it can be considered selective within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepinguga tehti terminoloogiasse teatavaid muudatusi: „ühendus” asendati „liiduga” ja „ühisturg” „siseturuga”.
Finally, the measure was liable to distort competition and have an effect on trade for the reasons explained in Section 5.1.1.
Käesolevas otsuses kasutatakse läbivalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu terminoloogiat.
The Commission therefore considers that the 2006 contract involved State aid for FSBG.
ELT C 213, 19.7.2012, lk 1.
It must be assessed as operating aid.
E-3778/08, 8. juuli 2008.
As described in Section 5.1.5.4, operating aid granted before the date of application of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines may be declared compatible with the full extent of uncovered operating costs provided that the following conditions are met:
Vt joonealune märkus nr 2.
contribution to a well–defined objective of common interest,
Komisjoni teatis „Suunised lennujaamadele ja -ettevõtjatele antava riigiabi kohta” ( ELT C 99, 4.4.2014, lk 3).
need for State intervention,
Vt joonealune märkus 5.
existence of incentive effect,
ELT C 113, 15.4.2014, lk 30.
proportionality of the aid amount (aid limited to the minimum necessary),
Vt joonealune märkus 7
The operating aid under assessment, which concerned the leasing of airport infrastructure below market price, had the objective of maintaining the appropriate level of operation at Saarbrücken Airport.
http://www.flughafen-saarbruecken.de/index.php?id=372
According to point 113 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, operating aid to airports will be considered to contribute to the achievement of an objective of common interest if it increases the mobility of Union citizens and the connectivity of the regions, combats air traffic congestion at major Union hub airports or facilitates regional development.
http://www.flughafen-saarbruecken.de/index.php?id=daten_fakten
As explained in recital 254, operating aid to Saarbrücken Airport contributed to the connectivity and development of the region.
Ärisaladus.
For the reasons set out in recital 284, the duplication argument applies rather to the State aid granted to Zweibrücken Airport.
Allikas: Google Mapsi kohaselt kiireim tee.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the operating aid granted to FSBG contributed to the achievement of the objective of common interest of improving the connectivity and regional development of the Saarland region through the operation of transport infrastructure to meet the transport needs of the region.
Intressi-, maksu- ja amortisatsioonieelne kasum sisaldab avaliku sektori ülesannete hulka kuuluva tegevuse või üldist majandushuvi pakkuva teenusena käsitletava tegevuse riiklikku rahastamist ja kompenseerimist, vt Saksamaa 5. mail 2012 esitatud teabe II lisa.
According to point 118 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, airports with an annual passenger traffic below 700 000 passengers per annum may not be able to cover their operating costs to a substantial extent.
Saksamaa teatas, et kasutatud raamatupidamissüsteemi tõttu ei ole võimalik eraldi välja tuua ohutusele/julgeolekule või muule taristule tehtud kulusid.
Traffic at Saarbrücken Airport was constantly below 700 000 passengers.
Saksamaa esitas teabe 17. jaanuaril 2011, manus 6, ja 16. aprillil 2012, lk 9.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the aid was necessary as it allowed an improvement in the connectivity of the region that the market would not deliver by itself.
Saksamaa esitas teabe 16. aprillil 2012, lk 9.
As pointed out above, Saarbrücken Airport received investment aid which enabled the airport to satisfy the connectivity and transport needs of the Saarland region (see recital 285).
Komisjoni otsus 2005/842/EÜ, 28. november 2005, EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 86 lõike 2 kohaldamise kohta üldist majandushuvi pakkuvaid teenuseid osutavatele ettevõtjatele avalike teenuste eest makstava hüvitisena antava riigiabi suhtes (ELT L 312, 29.11.2005, lk 67).
Despite rather stable passenger numbers, the airport is not able to cover its operating costs.
Komisjoni teatis „Ühenduse suunised raskustes olevate äriühingute päästmiseks ja ümberkorraldamiseks antava riigiabi kohta” (2004) ( ELT C 244, 1.10.2004, lk 2).
The losses were incurred despite the fact that the lease paid by FSBG in those years was lower than the lease paid under the 1997 contract (see Table 7).
Saksamaa 5. mail 2012 esitatud teave, II lisa.
It can hence be assumed that the aid involved in the 2006 contract had an incentive effect and did not exceed the amount required to cover operating losses and thus was limited to the minimum necessary for the aided activity to take place.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-222/04: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze vs. Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA et al, punkt 111.
On this basis, the Commission concludes that the compatibility conditions laid down in the 2014 Aviation Guidelines are met.
2005. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punkt 34.
DISCOUNTS FOR AIRLINES/MARKETING AGREEMENTS
2005. aasta lennundussektori suuniste punkti 39 alapunkt 2.
By providing air transportation services, airlines are performing an economic activity and therefore constitute undertakings within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-35/96: Euroopa Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik (EKL 1998, lk I-3851); otsus kohtuasjas C-41/90: Klaus Höfner ja Fritz Elser vs. Macrotron GmbH, (EKL 1991, lk I-1979); otsus kohtuasjas C-244/94: Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances vs. Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche (EKL 1995, lk I-4013); otsus kohtuasjas C-55/96: Job Centre (EKL 1997, lk I-7119).
It must be analysed whether the arrangements between the airlines and the airport in question granted the former an economic advantage.
Otsus kohtuasjas 118/85: Euroopa Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik (EKL 1987, lk 2599); otsus kohtuasjas 35/96: Euroopa Komisjon vs. Itaalia Vabariik, (EKL 1998, lk I-3851).
Where an airport has public resources at its disposal, aid to an airline can, in principle, be excluded where the relationship between the airport and the airline satisfies the MEO test.
Liidetud kohtuasjad T-443/08 ja T-455/08: Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG, Flughafen Leipzig/Halle GmbH vs. Euroopa Komisjon (Leipzig-Halle lennujaama kohtuasi), (EKL 2011, lk II-1311), eelkõige punktid 93 ja 94, mida kinnitab ka otsus kohtuasjas C-288/11 P: Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG ja Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH vs. Euroopa Komisjon, [2012] veel avaldamata.
The existence of an advantage can normally be excluded if: (a) the price charged for the services corresponds to the market price; or (b) it can be demonstrated through an ex ante analysis that the airport/airline arrangement will lead to a positive incremental profit contribution for the airport and is part of an overall strategy leading to profitability in the long term.
Kohtuasjad C-159/91: Poucet vs. AGV ja C-160/9: Pistre vs. Cancave (EKL 1993, lk I-637).
In order to assess whether an arrangement concluded by an airport with an airline satisfies the MEO test, expected non–aeronautical revenues stemming from the airline’s activity should be taken into consideration together with airport charges, net of any rebates, marketing support or incentive schemes.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-222/04: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze vs. Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA et al, (EKL 2006, lk I-289), punkt 111.
Similarly, all expected costs incrementally incurred by the airport in relation to the airline’s activity at the airport must be taken into account.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-364/92: SAT Fluggesellschaft vs. Eurocontrol (EKL 1994, lk I-43).
For instance, if the airport needs to expand or build a new terminal or other facilities mainly to accommodate the needs of a specific airline, such costs should be taken into consideration when calculating the incremental costs.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-343/95: Cali & Figli vs..Servizi ecologici porto di Genova (EKL 1997, lk I-1547); komisjoni otsus N309/02, 19. märts 2003; komisjoni otsus N438/2002, 16. oktoober 2002, abi sadamavaldajatele ametiülesannete täitmiseks.
In contrast, costs which the airport would have to incur anyway independently from the arrangement with the airline should not be taken into account in the MEO test.
Komisjoni otsus N309/02, 19. märts 2003.
In addition, the airport infrastructure must be open to all airlines and not dedicated to a specific airline in order to exclude that the advantage resulting from compatible aid to the airport operator is not passed on to a specific airline.
Vt eelkõige otsus kohtuasjas C-364/92: SAT/Eurocontro (EKL 1994, lk I-43), punkt 30; ning otsus kohtuasjas C-113/07: P Selex Sistemi Integrati vs. komisjon (EKL 2009, lk I-2207), punkt 71.
Against this background, the Commission will asses the overall scheme of airport charges applicable at Saarbrücken Airport as well as the individual contracts between airlines and Saarbrücken Airport which deviate from or are outside the scope of the scheme of airport charges.
Vt muu hulgas otsus kohtuasjas C-172/03: Wolfgang Heiser vs. Finanzamt Innsbruck, (EKL 2005, lk I-01627), punkt 36, ja viidatud kohtuasjad.
On 1 April 2007, a new schedule of charges was introduced at Saarbrücken Airport (2007 schedule of charges).
Komisjoni 20. veebruari 2014. aasta otsus riigiabi SA.35847 kohta (2012/N) – Tšehhi Vabariik – Ostrava lennujaam, ei ole veel Euroopa Liidu Teatajas avaldatud, põhjendus 16.
This schedule envisaged discounts for airlines fulfilling certain conditions.
Lennuliiklusseaduse paragrahvi 27 lõike d punktis 1 sätestatakse: „Flugsicherungsdienste und die dazu erforderlichen flugsicherungstechnischen Einrichtungen werden an den Flugplätzen vorgehalten, bei denen das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung einen Bedarf aus Gründen der Sicherheit und aus verkehrspolitischen Interessen anerkennt”.
The 2007 schedule of charges in particular offered discounts for new airlines, new destinations and increased passenger numbers.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-482/99: Prantsusmaa vs. komisjon (Stardust Marine) (EKL 2002, lk I-4397).
Until then, no discounts had been foreseen in the schedule of charges.
12. mai 2011. aasta otsus liidetud kohtuasjades T-267/08 ja T-279/08: Nord-Pas-de-Calais, veel avaldamata, punkt 108.
Saarbrücken Airport adopted a new schedule of charges which entered into force on 1 September 2013, replacing the 2007 schedule of charges.
Vh Saarit ja FSBesitzG/FSGd võib pidada Saksa äriseadustiku paragrahvi 290 tähenduses seotud äriühinguteks.
The 2013 schedule of charges is not subject to the present decision.
Leping, mille alusel üks äriühing annab äriühingu juhtimise teisele ettevõttele.
When applying the MEO test to the measure at stake, the Commission first has to determine whether the price charged corresponds to a market price.
Otsus kohtuasjas C-39/94: Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) jt vs. La Poste jt (EKL 1996, lk I-3547), punkt 60; otsus kohtuasjas C-342/96, Hispaania Kuningriik vs. Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (EKL1999, lk I-2459), punkt 41.