natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission will therefore assess whether these five criteria are met in the present case, for the aid to be considered compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 93 TFEU.
Kõikidele kasutajatele võrdse juurdepääsuga ühendveoterminalide ehitamine on suunatud ühistes huvides olevale eesmärgile, mis seisneb kombineeritud vedude osakaalu suurendamises ja maanteevedudelt raudtee- ja siseveetranspordile ülemineku soodustamises ning seeläbi maanteevedudest tingitud ummikute, õnnetuste, heite, müra ja kliimale avalduva negatiivse mõju vähendamises.
Objective of common interest
Üheski vastuses menetluse algatamisele ei vaidlustatud, et meetme eesmärk — st toetada üleminekut maanteevedudelt raudtee- ja siseveetranspordile — on ühistes huvides.
The Union has for some time pursued a policy of achieving a balanced combined transport system, and the fostering of the competitiveness of combined transport vis-à-vis road usage is a part of this policy.
Žilina (Teplička) terminali kavandatud ehitust ja käitamist silmas pidades on Slovakkia ametiasutuste esitatud andmete kohaselt kasu, mis saadakse väliskulude säästuga, enam kui 15 korda suurem kavandatava taristu ehituskuludest.
The aim of the Union's combined transport policy is to achieve a modal shift from carriage by road to other modes of transport.
Peale selle saadakse enamik kogu 399 miljoni euro suurusest eeldatavast kasust EList väljaspool Slovakkiat, sest Slovakkia ja ülejäänud ELi vahelise transpordi puhul on teekonna Slovakkiast väljapoole jääv osa tavaliselt pikem kui Slovakkias läbitav osa.
Union instruments, such as Council Directive 92/106/EEC [17] of 7 December 1992 aim at fostering the development of combined transport.
Slovakkia ametiasutuste esitatud kulude ja tulude analüüs Žilina terminali kohta
The White Paper on Transport Policy [18] encourages the use of rail and other environmentally friendly modes of transport in order to develop competitive alternatives to road haulage.
(eurodes)
In addition, combined transport policy is in line with the conclusions of the Gothenburg European Council of June 2001, which declared that measures helping the modal shift from road transport to more environmentally friendly transport modes are at the heart of the policy for sustainable transport.
Žilina terminali keskkonnasääst 30 aasta jooksul
The Commission recognises that it is primarily the task of market operators to improve combined transport within markets with free access and where the rules of free competition and supply and demand prevail.
Sääst ummikutelt
However, to fully unleash the potential of combined transport, the willingness to take risks inherent in switching from road to alternative modes of transport may need to be stimulated.
Sääst õnnetustelt
Furthermore, the focus on combined transport options is also increasingly justified by the following consideration:
Sääst heitelt
Europe's industry maintains or increases the competitiveness of its Europe-based production largely by advanced logistics, optimising production and distribution and creating value in the process.
Sääst müralt
These sophisticated supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to the decreasing reliability and increasing costs of road haulage.
Sääst kliimakahjult
Combined transport logistics will thus have to become a prime objective for Europe's manufacturing industry.
Sääst kokku
Lastly, the Commission refers to the need to accelerate investments in infrastructure, particularly in environmentally friendly transport modes which are part of the Trans-European Networks (TENs) and high-speed ICT networks [19].
Seega on komisjon arvamusel, et Žilina (Teplička) ühendveoterminali ehitamine võib aidata saavutada ühistes huvides olevat eesmärki, sest toetab mitmeliigilise transpordi osakaalu suurendamist ja soodustab üleminekut maanteevedudelt raudtee- ja siseveetranspordile, vähendades seega maanteevedudest tingitud ummikuid, õnnetusi, heidet, müra ja kliimale avalduvat negatiivset mõju.
The construction of intermodal terminals that guarantee equal access to all users has been supported by several EU instruments.
Vajalikkus ja proportsionaalsus
Decision No 661/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [20] requires establishing a trans-European transport network, which must be, as far as possible, interoperable within modes of transport and encourage intermodality between the different modes of transport.
Varem [23] on komisjon lubanud ühendveoterminalidele investeeringuteks ettenähtud abi osakaaluga 50 %.
Projects of common interest, according to that decision, must contribute to the sustainable development of transport by improving safety and reducing environmental damage caused by transport, in particular by promoting a modal shift towards railways, intermodal transport, inland waterways and maritime transport.
Viimasel ajal, kui liikmesriigid on näidanud majanduslikku vajadust suurema abi osakaalu järele, on komisjon suurema osakaalu heaks kiitnud nõuetekohaselt põhjendatud juhtudel [24].
Article 10 of Council Directive 91/440/EEC [21] of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community's railways requires Member States to ensure that railway undertakings from other Member States have access to the infrastructure on equitable conditions for the purpose of operating international combined transport goods services.
Käesoleval juhul on Slovakkia ametiasutused teatanud meetmest, milles abi osakaal on vähemalt 85 % tulevase kontsessioonivaldaja kasuks.
Moreover, in its Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the Trans-European Transport Network [22], the Commission proposed that operators of freight terminals should ensure that freight terminals are open to all operators, provide this access in a non-discriminatory way and apply transparent charges.
Kõnealune projekt erineb Metransi eraterminalidest, mille äriühing on ehitanud ilma Slovakkialt riigiabi saamata, ja naabruses asuvast WienConti terminalist (mille omanik on Viini linn), mis on alates 2006. aastast saanud abi keskmise osakaaluga 31 % täiendava varustuse ostmiseks.
The construction of intermodal terminals that guarantee equal access to all users is directed at attaining an objective of common interest in that it contributes to enhancing combined transport and encouraging a modal shift from road to rail and inland-waterway transport and thereby to decreasing congestion, accident rates, emissions, noise and the negative impact on the climate stemming from road transport.
WienConti investeering ei olnud esialgne investeering täiesti uuena ehitatavasse terminali, nagu seda on Žilina (Teplička) terminal.
It is not disputed by any of the submissions in response to the initiation of the procedure that the objective of the measure, i.e. supporting the shift from road transport to rail and inland waterways, is an objective of common interest.
Peale selle kasutab WienCont raudteetaristu-ettevõtja raudteid ja Viini linna maad, mille eest ta maksab renti, mille maksumus ei pruugi olla sama mis juhul, kui tal tuleks raudtee ja maa osta.
As regards the planned construction and operation of the terminal in Žilina-Teplička, according to the data provided by the Slovak authorities the benefits in terms of savings in external costs are over 15 times higher than the construction costs of the planned infrastructure.
Kuna abi osakaal Slovakkia puhul on üle 50 %, tuleb komisjonil igal juhul kaaluda, kas abi suuremat osakaalu võib erandkorras pidada siseturuga kokkusobivaks.
Moreover, most of the total expected benefits of EUR 399 million will be achieved in the EU outside Slovakia, since for transport between Slovakia and the rest of the EU the stretch of the journey travelled outside Slovakia is usually longer than the stretch inside Slovakia.
Seoses abi vajalikkusega projitseerib Slovakkia ametiasutuste esitatud kavandatava Žilina (Teplička) terminali tulude-kulude analüüs negatiivset sisemist tulumäära, kui riigi toetust ei ole.
Cost-benefit analysis for the Žilina terminal submitted by the Slovak authorities
Allpool esitatud tabelis on kokku võetud investeerimiskulud, tegevuskulud, oodatav kasum investeeringult ja abisumma, mis on kavandatud Žilina terminali ehituseks, nagu need on välja arvutatud kulude-tulude analüüsis, mille esitasid Slovakkia ametiasutused.
(in EUR)
Slovakkia ametiasutused, kulude-tulude analüüs
Environmental savings over 30 years for the Žilina terminal
(miljonit eurot)
Savings on congestion
Investeerimiskulud
Savings on accidents
Tegevuskulud
Savings on emissions
Kulud kokku
Savings on noise
Tulu
Savings on climate
Riigiabi
Total savings
Oodatav kasum
Accordingly, the Commission considers that the construction of the Žilina-Teplička intermodal terminal may help attain an objective of common interest as it contributes to enhancing multi-modal transport and encouraging a modal shift from road to rail and inland-waterway transport, thereby reducing congestion, accidents, emissions, noise and the negative impact on the climate caused by road transport.
NPV pärast riigiabi (5 %)
Necessity and proportionality
Kuna esialgne investeering on piiratud projekti rahastamislüngaga, teeb komisjon järelduse, et abi on vajalik ühendveoterminali ehitamise tagamiseks ja kombineeritud vedude arendamiseks Slovakkias.
In the past [23], the Commission has authorised investment aid for intermodal terminals with an aid intensity of 50 %.
Samuti on ta seisukohal, et abi suurus on vajaliku miinimumi tasemel, sest see on suurem rahastamislüngast ning on seetõttu proportsionaalne, et saavutada ühistes huvides olev eesmärk tagada üleminek maanteeveolt raudteeveole.
In the present case, the Slovak authorities have notified a measure which provides for aid intensity of at least 85 % in favour of the future concession holder.
Käesoleva meetme eesmärk on ehitada riiklikke ühendveoterminale maismaa kombineeritud vedude (eelkõige poolhaagiste ja vahetatavate kaubakorpuste) jaoks, et toetada üleminekut maanteeveolt raudteeveole.
This project is different from the private terminals of Metrans, which the company built with no State aid from Slovakia, and from the nearby WienCont terminal (owned by the City of Vienna), which has been receiving aid with an average intensity of 31 % for the purchase of additional equipment since 2006.
Selle eesmärgi saavutamiseks tagavad terminalid järgmist:
In the case of WienCont the investment was not initial investment for a new terminal built from scratch, as is the case with the Žilina-Teplička terminal.
neid käitavad äriühingud on sõltumatud neid kasutavatest veoettevõtjatest;
In any case, as the aid intensity in the Slovak case is above 50 %, the Commission has to consider whether this higher aid intensity can exceptionally be found compatible with the internal market.
pakuvad mittediskrimineerivaid ja läbipaistvaid tingimusi.
As regards the necessity of the aid, the cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities projects a negative internal rate of return for the planned transport terminal in Žilina-Teplička without public support.
Selleks et tagada mittediskrimineeriv juurdepääs terminalidele ja vältida huvide konflikti tekkimist väljavalitud terminaliettevõtja ja veoettevõtjate vahel, on terminaliettevõtja sõltumatu veoettevõtjatest.
When Slovakia takes into account the entire initial investment, including the costs of purchasing the land, the funding gap of the project at a discount rate of 5 % corresponds to the initial investment of EUR 25,04 million.
Lisaks sellele jääb Slovakkia riik terminalide omanikuks ja lisab kontsessioonilepingusse ettevõtja kohustuse tagada mittediskrimineeriv avatud juurdepääs kõikidele kasutajatele, sealhulgas kõikidele vedajatele ja ühendveoterminalide ettevõtjatele.
A discount rate of 5 % is comparable to the return on long-term public debt in Slovakia [25].
Kui väljavalitud ettevõtja ei suuda seda kontsessioonilepingu tingimust täita, on riigil õigus kontsessioon tagasi võtta ja korraldada uus hange.
The table below summarises the investment costs, operating costs, expected return on investment and aid amount planned for the construction of the Žilina terminal as calculated in the cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities.
Seetõttu on juurdepääs asjaomasele taristule mittediskrimineerivalt avatud kõikidele kasutajatele.
Slovak authorities, cost-benefit analysis
Abi ei too kaasa konkurentsimoonutusi, mis oleks vastuolus ühiste huvidega
(in EUR millions)
Meede esialgselt teatatud kujul oleks kahjustanud ühendveoterminali teenuseid Slovaki Vabariigis, mis samuti meelitab ligi piiriülest nõudlust Austriast, Tšehhi Vabariigist, Ungarist ja vähemal määral Poolast.
Terminal
Selleks et vältida konkurentsimoonutuse riski, nagu on sätestatud menetluse algatamise otsuses, ja et katsetada oma oletusi terminali mõju kohta üleminekul maanteevedudelt raudteevedudele, otsustasid Slovakkia ametiasutused piirata projekti ainult ühe katseprojekti terminali ehitamisega Žilinasse (Teplička).
Investment costs
Kõnealune terminal on enam kui 200 km kaugusel praegustest Metransi ja WienConti terminalidest.
Operating costs
Selle teeninduspiirkond ei kattu seega Metransi ega WienConti alaga.
Total costs
See piirab meetme mõju konkurentsile [26].
Revenu
Slovakkia ametiasutuste teatel on Žilinas Intransile kuuluv ajutine terminal.
State aid
Erinevalt kavandatavast terminalist on see väike ja asub kesklinnas.
Expected profit
Selles terminalis pääseb laadimisrambi juurde ainult ühelt 400 m rööbasteelt, mida pole võimalik pikendada.
NPV after state aid (5 %)
Terminal on projekteeritud merekonteinerite jaoks ja seal ei ole sildkraanasid ega vahetatavate kaubakorpuste ja poolhaagiste ümberlaadimise varustust.
As the initial investment is limited to the funding gap of the project, the Commission concludes that the aid is necessary to ensure the construction of the intermodal transfer terminal and the development of combined transport in Slovakia.
Pealegi on linnaplaneerimisel ette nähtud praeguse Žilina terminali sulgemine lähitulevikus.
It also takes the view that the aid will be kept to the minimum necessary, since it is greater than the funding gap and is, therefore, proportionate for achieving the common interest objective of ensuring the shift from road transport to rail transport.
Slovakkia ametiasutused on kinnitanud, et käitlustoimingute tasud riiklikes terminalides vastavad juba turul tegutsevate ühendveoterminalide käitlustasudele.
The access to the infrastructure in question is open to all users on a non-discriminatory basis
Slovakkia ametiasutuste korraldatud uuringu järgi on käitlustoimingute tasud ELi terminalides 16.30–56 eurot veoühiku kohta, keskmine tasu on 30 eurot.
The purpose of the measure is to construct public intermodal transfer terminals for continental combined transport, in particular semi-trailers and swap-bodies, in order to support the shift from road to rail transport.
Kõrgemad tasud tähendaksid, et riikliku terminali ettevõtja ei suudaks saada maanteevedude sektorist piisavalt kaupa, et katta oma tegevuskulusid.
To achieve this objective, the terminals will:
Seetõttu on komisjon jõudnud järeldusele, et meede ei moonuta konkurentsi määral, mis oleks vastuolus ühiste huvidega.
be operated by companies independent of the transport companies using them;
JÄRELDUS
provide for open access;
Eespool esitatut arvesse võttes teeb komisjon järelduse, et kõik tingimused on täidetud ja et 25,04 miljoni euro suurune investeeringuteks ettenähtud abi Žilina (Teplička) terminalile on siseturuga kokkusobiv.
offer non-discriminatory and transparent conditions.
Võttes arvesse Slovakkia esialgset kava ehitada neli riiklikku ühendveoterminali, nõuab komisjon järelevalvet terminali üle, mis ehitatakse praegu teatatud katseprojekti alusel.
In order to ensure non-discriminatory access to the terminals and to prevent a conflict of interests from arising between the selected terminal operator and the transport undertakings, the operator of the terminals will be independent of the transport undertakings.
Kõnealune järelevalve võimaldab komisjonil võtta vastu paremini põhjendatud otsuse abi vajalikkuse ja mõju kohta, mida see konkurentsile avaldab, kui Slovakkia kunagi tulevikus teatab abist ülejäänud kolmele terminalile,
Moreover, the Slovak State will remain the owner of the terminals and will include in any concession agreement the obligation for the operator of the terminals to guarantee open access to all users, including all transporters and operators of intermodal transport terminals, on a non-discriminatory basis.
ON VASTU VÕTNUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE:
If the selected operator fails to fulfil this condition of the concession agreement, the State will have the power to withdraw the concession and put it out to tender again.
Artikkel 1
Therefore, the access to the infrastructure in question will be open to all users on a non-discriminatory basis.
Riigiabi, mida Slovaki Vabariik kavatseb rakendada Žilinasse (Teplička) terminali ehitamiseks 25,04 miljoni euro suuruse esialgse investeeringuteks ettenähtud abina, on Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 93 tähenduses siseturuga kokkusobiv.
The aid does not lead to distortions of competition contrary to the common interest
Kõnealuse 25,04 miljoni euro suuruse abi rakendamine on seega lubatud.
The measure as originally notified would affect intermodal terminal services in the Slovak Republic, which also attracts cross-border demand from Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and, to a lesser extent, Poland.
Artikkel 2
In order to avoid the risk of distortion of competition, as set out in the decision initiating the procedure, and in order to test their assumption regarding the impact of the terminal on shifting goods transport from road to rail, the Slovak authorities undertook to limit the project to building a single pilot project terminal in Žilina-Teplička.
Kolme aasta pärast esitab Slovaki Vabariik järgmise teabe:
This terminal will be more than 200 km from the current Metrans and WienCont terminals.
Slovakkia ja Žilina (Teplička) terminali ühendvedude kogumaht, maismaavedude maht ja selliste vedude maht, kus kasutatakse muid vahendeid kui ISO konteinerid;
Its catchment areas will therefore not overlap with the Metrans and WienCont areas.
Žilina (Teplička) terminali hinnakiri;
According to the Slovak authorities, there is a temporary terminal in Žilina which belongs to Intrans.
Artikkel 3
Unlike the planned terminal, this terminal is small and located in the centre of the town.
Käesolev otsus on adresseeritud Slovaki Vabariigile.
At this terminal the loading ramp is accessible only from a single track 400 m long, which it is not possible to extend.
Brüssel, 17. juuli 2013
The terminal is designed for sea containers and does not have any gantry cranes or equipment for transhipment of swap bodies and semi-trailers.
Komisjoni nimel
Due to town-planning developments, the existing Žilina terminal will in any case be closed in the near future.
Joaquín Almunia
The Slovak authorities have confirmed that the handling charges at the public terminals will correspond to the handling charges of the intermodal transport terminals already operating in the market.
ELT C 45, 16.2.2013, lk 13.
According to a survey conducted by the Slovak authorities, the handing charges at terminals in the EU are between EUR 16,30 and EUR 56 per unit, the average charge being EUR 30.
Vt allmärkus 1.
The cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities was based on the assumption that the future handling charges per unit at all four public terminals would be EUR 28-29.
teoreetiline ümberlaadimisvõimsus olemasoleva asukohaskeemiga ning käitlemistehnika ja protsessitehnoloogia kasutamisega
The charges at the public terminal in Žilina-Teplička will, therefore, be set to maintain the competitiveness of rail transport compared with the road sector.
uute terminalide teoreetiline ümberlaadimisvõimsus pärast esimese ehitusetapi lõpetamist
Increased fees would mean that the operator of the public terminals would be unable to attract enough cargo from the road transport sector to cover its operating costs.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv 2012/34/EL, 21. november 2012, millega luuakse ühtne Euroopa raudteepiirkond (ELT L 343, 14.12.2012, lk 32).
The Commission therefore concludes that the measure does not distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest.
International Union for Road-Rail Combined Transport (rahvusvaheline maantee-raudtee kombineeritud kaubaveo liit):
CONCLUSION
http://www.uirr.com/en/media-centre/annual-reports/annual-reports/mediacentre/516-annual-report-2011.html.
In view of the above, the Commission concludes that all the conditions are fulfilled and the investment aid of EUR 25,04 million for the Žilina-Teplička terminal is compatible with the internal market.
Rahvusvaheline Raudteeliit:
Given Slovakia's original plan to build four public intermodal terminals, the Commission requires monitoring of the terminal that is to be built on the basis of the pilot project currently notified.
http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/2012_report_on_combined_transport_in_europe.pdf.
This monitoring will allow the Commission to take a more solid decision on the necessity of the aid and its effect on competition, if at some point in the future Slovakia notifies aid for the remaining three terminals,
Vt muu hulgas kohtuasi C-82/01P: Aéroports de Paris (EKL 2002, lk I-9297) ning kohtuasjad T-443/08 ja T-445/08: Freistaat Sachsen ja Land Sachsen-Anhalt vs. komisjon (EKLis veel avaldamata).
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Vt eelkõige kohtuasi 730/79: Philip Morris vs. komisjon (EKL 1980, lk 2671, punkt 11);
Article 1
kohtuasi C-53/00:
The State aid which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement for the construction of the terminal in Žilina-Teplička in the form of initial investment aid of EUR 25,04 million is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 93 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Ferring (EKL 2001, lk I-9067, punkt 21), ja kohtuasi C-372/97: Itaalia vs. komisjon (EKL 2004, lk I-3679, punkt 44).
Implementation of this aid of EUR 25,04 million is accordingly authorised.
Kohtuasi T-214/95: Het Vlaamse Gewest vs. komisjon (EKL 1998, lk II-717).
Article 2
Vt komisjoni 31. jaanuari 2001. aasta otsus menetluses N 597/2000, EÜT C 102, 31.3.2001, lk 8;
In three years' time the Slovak Republic shall provide the following information:
komisjoni 14. septembri 2001. aasta otsus menetluses N 208/2000, EÜT C 315, 4.1.2000, lk 21;
the total volume of intermodal transport, the volume of continental transport and the volume of transport using means other than ISO containers in Slovakia and at the Žilina-Teplička terminal;
komisjoni 15. novembri 2000. aasta otsus menetluses N 755/1999, EÜT C 71, 3.3.2001, lk 17 ja 19;
the prices charged at the Žilina-Teplička terminal;
komisjoni 11. novembri 2001. aasta otsus menetluses N 550/01, EÜT C 24, 26.1.2002, lk 2.
whether the clients of the new terminals had previously been using the existing terminals and, if so, a survey on why they switched.
Kohtuasi C-280/00: Altmark Trans GmbH (EKL 2003, lk I-7747).
Article 3
Vt komisjoni 11. veebruari 2009. aasta otsus menetluses N 651/08 — Combinant multimodal container terminal (EFRO), ELT C 60, 14.3.2009, lk 4.
This Decision is addressed to the Slovak Republic.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1370/2007, 23. oktoober 2007, mis käsitleb avaliku reisijateveoteenuse osutamist raudteel ja maanteel ning millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks nõukogu määrused (EMÜ) nr 1191/69 ja (EMÜ) nr 1107/70 (ELT L 315, 3.12.2007, lk 1).
Done at Brussels, 17 July 2013.
Kohtuasi C-156/77: komisjon vs. Belgia (EKL 1978, lk I-1881, punkt 10).
For the Commission
Vt komisjoni 20. juuli 2010. aasta otsus menetluses C 17/10 Firmin srl, ELT C 278, 15.10.2010, lk 28.
Vice-President
Nõukogu direktiiv 92/106/EMÜ, 7. detsember 1992, millega kehtestatakse ühiseeskirjad kaupade teatavate kombineeritud vedude kohta liikmesriikide vahel (EÜT L 368, 17.12.1992, lk 38).
OJ C 45, 16.2.2013, p. 13.
„Euroopa ühtse transpordipiirkonna tegevuskava — Konkurentsivõimelise ja ressursitõhusa transpordisüsteemi suunas”, KOM(2011) 144, 28.3.2011.
See footnote 1.
Komisjoni teatis Euroopa Ülemkogule — Euroopa majanduse taastamise kava, KOM(2008) 800 (lõplik), 26.11.2008.