natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to Germany, those charges cannot therefore be fixed freely by the operator in the light of economic considerations, and in fact, they are set without any relation to the investment costs.
Saksamaa väitis, et hiljuti muudetud õhusõidukite müra käsitleva õigusakti (Gesetz zum Schutz gegen Fluglärm) sätete kohaselt hõlmavad müra vähendamise meetmed ainult 78 km2 suurust ala, kuhu jääb 3000 elumaja, ja meetmete maksumus ulatub […] miljoni euroni.
Areas let for commercial purposes other than airline operation are, in view of Germany, irrelevant.
Saksamaa teatas ka, et FLH sellest õigusakti muudatusest kasu ei saa ja tema suhtes kehtib endiselt rangem kaitseala.
Germany stated further, in that regard, that airports have higher than average fixed costs relating to infrastructure, equipment and operation.
Saksamaa kinnitas, et sellega seoses on Leipzigi/Halle lennujaama kanda oluliselt suuremad kulud võrreldes tema konkurentidega (Saksamaal ja liidust väljaspool).
In addition, their freedom of action is limited by strict legal obligations and conditions.
Lisaks omandas lennujaam rängalt mõjutatud alal elanike kinnisvara ja maksis neile hüvitist.
Germany considered further that the references to the Aéroports de Paris judgment [19] and to the Leipzig/Halle judgement [20] were irrelevant.
Saksamaa märkis veel, et lennujaam tegeles oma ehitustegevuse tasakaalustamiseks mõningase looduskaitsega.
With regard to the Aéroports de Paris judgment, Germany submitted that the judgment does not deal with the construction of airport infrastructures, but with the operation of an airport.
Saksamaa sõnul oli selle eesmärk ennetada või vähendada õhusõidukite müra ja ehitustööde mõju kolmandatele isikutele ning seega oli tegemist avalikes huvides täidetava ülesandega.
Additionally, Germany considered that the Aéroports de Paris judgment does not deal with the interpretation of the concept of ‘undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, but concerns an infringement of the prohibition on the abuse of a dominant position within the meaning of Article 102 of the Treaty.
Saksamaa sõnul oli kolmandate isikute kaitse müra ja eelkõige õhusõidukite müra eest üks riigi põhilistest ametlikest kohustustest ja ülesannetest.
With regard to the Leipzig/Halle judgment, Germany considered that the judgment of the General Court does not have any effect as a precedent in case-law, as it is subject to an appeal.
Saksamaa väitis ka, et mootorimüra kontrollimiseks ette nähtud ehitis (M2) kujutas endast avalike huvidega seotud meedet.
Public policy remit
Ta kinnitas, et seoses lõunapoolse lennuraja planeeringu heakskiitmise otsusega kehtestatud mürapiiranguid saab päeva ajal (6.00 kuni 22.00) täita ilma mootori kontrollimise suletud ehitiseta.
According to Germany, even if the financing of infrastructure measures was subject to State aid rules, it would not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty since the financing of infrastructure measures mainly constituted the necessary and proportionate reimbursement of costs for the performance of tasks falling within the prerogative powers of the State.
Saksamaa teatas aga, et 31. juulil 2007 saadud käitamisloa kohaselt peab lennujaam teostama kontrolle suletud ehitises ka päeva ajal.
In this regard, Germany stated that according to the 2005 Aviation Guidelines, the activities that normally fall under State responsibility in the exercise of its official powers as a public authority were not of an economic nature and did not fall within the scope of State aid rules.
Veelgi enam, Saksamaa selgitas, et mootori kontrollimist nõuti seoses õhusõiduki töökindluse säilitamisega ja see ületaks mürapiirangud, kui seda tehtaks öisel ajal väljaspool suletud ehitist.
Germany claimed that in connection with the performance of tasks falling within the public policy remit, the practice of the Commission distinguished at least between the following categories of security-related measures: the protection of air traffic against external threats, such as hijacking and other acts of violence against air traffic, the protection of air traffic against operational risks and the protection of third parties against operational hazards from air traffic.
Seega on mootorite kontrollimiseks mõeldud ehitise rajamine kinnise hoone kujul Saksamaa arvates vajalik selleks, et kaitsta kohalikke elanikke õhusõidukite tekitatava vastuvõetamatult suure müra eest.
In the view of Germany, with regard to the protection of air traffic against operational risks, the airport operator has the duty to renovate, modernise and expand the airport infrastructure in order to prevent operational hazards.
Seoses meetmega M3 väidab Saksamaa, et kõnealuste taristuelementide ehitamine kuulub avalike huvidega seotud meetmete hulka, kuna see teostati lennuliikluse kaitsmiseks õhusõidukite käitamisega seotud ohtude eest.
Germany stated that the third category of measures typically covers the protection of third parties against aircraft noise and other harmful environmental effects.
Sõltumata lennuliikluse mahust, millega tulevikus tegeleda tuleb, ei piisanud lennuliikluse ohutu ja sujuva kulgemise tagamiseks olemasolevatest ruleerimisteedest juba minevikus.
Regarding the different infrastructure measures at stake, Germany argued that these measures mainly constituted compensation for the performance of activities falling within the public policy remit since the measures protected third parties against operational hazard from air traffic.
Lisaks kinnitas Saksamaa, et uus ruleerimistee on tuletõrjebrigaadi juurdepääsutee hädaolukorras idaosas paiknevast tuletõrjedepoost lennujaama põhjaossa.
With regard to the noise abatement measures, Germany stated that in the context of the planning approval procedure, noise abatement measures in approximately 10000 dwelling houses would need to be installed.
Saksamaa sõnul tuleb samuti meeles pidada, et isegi kui kohaldatakse riigiabieeskirju, siis mõned kõnealustest ruleerimistee kuludest olid seotud valgustusega.
Germany argued that according to the provisions of the recently amended Gesetz zum Schutz gegen Fluglärm (Aircraft Noise Act, ‘FluglärmG’), the noise abatement measures would only cover an area of just 78 km2 with about 3000 dwelling houses and costs amounting to EUR […] million.
Valgustusega seoses tõi Saksamaa esile, et komisjon on oma Memmingeni otsuses [21] juba leidnud, et valgustuse näol on tegemist õhusõiduki navigeerimise ja juhtimise elemendiga ning seega võib selle liigitada avalike huvidega seotud meetmeks, mis jääb riigiabieeskirjade reguleerimisalast välja.
However, according to Germany, FLH did not benefit from this amendment of FluglärmG, and a more strict protection area still applies.
Saksamaa sõnul viiakse ka meede M4 ellu avalikes huvides, kuna toimevõime ja ohutusega seotud põhjustel tuleb maksimaalse lubatud stardimassiga teatud ilmastikutingimustes tegutsevatele laiakerelistele õhusõidukitele tagada täiendav stardidistants, sealhulgas täiendav pidurdusala, kui lendutõus katkestatakse.
In the regard, Germany asserted that Leipzig/Halle airport has to bear significantly higher costs than its competitors (in Germany and outside the Union).
Seoses meetmega M5 viidi territooriumi õigeaegne puhastamine ruleerimistee Victor ehitamiseks Saksamaa arvates ellu avalikes huvides, kuna ruleerimistee Victor ehitamine oli vajalik ohutu käitamise tagamiseks ning õnnetuste, ohutusriskide ja kahjuliku keskkonnamõju ennetamiseks.
In addition, the airport also acquired properties of badly affected residents and paid them compensation.
Saksamaa sõnul ja vastupidiselt komisjoni seisukohale ei olnud ruleerimistee Victor ehitamise eesmärk suurendada veomahtu ja kaudselt käivet.
Furthermore, Germany stated that the airport carried out some nature conservation activities in order to compensate for its building activities.
Saksamaa kinnitas, et see ehitati vaid tööohutust ja keskkonnamõju silmas pidades.
Germany argued that this was intended to prevent or reduce the impact of aircraft noise and of the construction works on third parties, and was thus a public policy function.
Enamgi veel, Saksamaa kinnitusel viidi ka kahe uue tuletõrjedepoo ehitamine ellu avalikes huvides, kuna komisjoni väljakujunenud tava kohaselt liigitatakse tuleohutusega ning eelkõige lennujaama tuletõrjedepoode ja asjaomaste seadmete hankimisega seotud meetmed avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannete hulka.
According to Germany, protecting third parties from noise, particularly aircraft noise, was one of the fundamental official duties and functions of the State.
Saksamaa tõi esile, et tuletõrjerajatise ehitamist Saksamaa lennujaamades rahastab tavaliselt riik.
Germany also argued that the engine noise testing facility, that is to say M2, constituted a public policy remit measure.
Ka mitmeotstarbelise angaari ehitamine viidi Saksamaa kinnitusel ellu avalikes huvides, kuna angaari kasutatakse ainult talviste teenuste osutamise seadmete hoidmiseks ja ajutise peavarjuna.
It stated that the noise limits set in the context of the planning approval decision for the construction of the southern runway could be fulfilled during daytime (6:00 to 22:00) without a closed engine testing structure.
Saksamaa selgitas, et talviste teenuste osutamise seadmete hoiukoha võimaldamine kujutab endast riigi ametlikku ülesannet, kuna see tagab lennujaama ohutu käitamise talveperioodil.
However, according to Germany, pursuant to the operating permit of 31 July 2007, the airport had to run tests in the closed testing structure also during the day.
Lisaks kinnitas Saksamaa, et see võimaldab lennujaamal täita oma seadusjärgset kohustust hoida lennujaama töövalmis igal ajal.
Furthermore, Germany explained that the engine test were required in the context of maintaining the operational safety of aircraft and would exceed the allowed noise limits, if performed during the night outside a closed structure.
Saksamaa selgitas, et ajutise peavarju pakkumine vastab üldisele huvile, kuna see aitab kaitsta inimelu.
Therefore, in the view of Germany the construction of the engine testing facility in the form of a closed building serves to protect local residents against any unacceptable levels of aircraft noise.
Saksamaa tsiteeris Rahvusvahelise Tsiviillennunduse Organisatsiooni sätteid, milles nõutakse lennujaama käitajatelt ruume haavatud inimeste ravimiseks ja surnukehade hoidmiseks hädaolukorras.
Concerning measure M3, Germany argued that the construction of these infrastructure elements falls within the public policy remit since it was carried out in order to protect air traffic against operational hazards.
Lisaks võib mitmeotstarbelisse angaari Saksamaa kinnitusel paigutada reisijad, kes ei saa loodusjõududest tingitud asjaolude tõttu oma reisi jätkata (näiteks 2010. aasta tuhapilv).
Regardless of the volume of traffic which is supposed to be handled in the future, the existing taxiway links were already insufficient in the past to guarantee safe and smooth handling of air traffic.
Saksamaa rõhutas ka, et uue angaari ehitamine oli vajalik, kuna eelmise mitmeotstarbelise angaari asukohas ei oleks selle laiendamine võimalik olnud.
Moreover, Germany stated that the new taxiway is the emergency access route for the fire brigade from the eastern fire station to the northern area of the airport.
Meetme M6 puhul viitas Saksamaa seoses meetmega M5 esitatud argumentidele.
According to Germany, even if State aid rules were applicable, it has to be kept in mind that some of these costs of the taxiway were related to the lighting.
Saksamaa kinnitas veel, et ruleerimistee Victor ehitamine lükati edasi.
Regarding lighting, Germany pointed out that the Commission had already decided in its Memmingen decision [21] that lighting constituted an element of aircraft guidance and control and could therefore be classified as activities falling within the public policy remit that falls outside the ambit of State aid rules.
Saksamaa sõnul kujutas ka jäätõrjealade (M7) laiendamine endast riigi ametliku ülesande täitmist, kuna neid rajatisi on vaja tööohutuse ja keskkonnamõjuga seotud põhjustel.
According to Germany, M4 would also be carried out in the fulfilment of activities falling within the public policy remit since operational capacity and safety reasons required to provide wide-body aircraft that operate at their permitted MTOW under certain climatic conditions with additional take-off distance, including an additional deceleration area in case of an aborted take-off.
Saksamaa selgitas ka, et täiendavaid jäätõrjealasid ei ole vaja selleks, et tagada piisav suutlikkus juhul, kui lennujaama liiklus kasvab, kuna Leipzigi/Halle lennujaam suudaks suurenenud liiklusega toime tulla ka ilma täiendavate jäätõrjealadeta.
Regarding measure M5, in the view of Germany, the site clearance in time for the construction of the taxiway Victor had been carried out in fulfilment of activities falling within the public policy remit since the taxiway Victor was required to guarantee safe operation and to prevent accidents, safety risks and adverse environmental impact.
Sellega seoses teatas Saksamaa, et viivitustel oleks omakorda negatiivne mõju keskkonnale, näiteks kütuse tarbimine, kahjulikud heitgaasid ja müra.
According to Germany, contrary to the opinion of the Commission, the construction of the taxiway Victor was not intended to increase capacity and indirectly turnover.
Seoses meetmega M8 väitis Saksamaa, et kopteriväljaku ehitamine lihtsustab lennupäästetöid lennujaamas ja üldist päästetegevust.
Germany stated that it was solely constructed for operational safety and environmental reasons.
Seoses meetmega M9.1 kinnitas Saksamaa, et I kontrollpunkti ümberehitamine oli vältimatult vajalik Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 300/2008 [22] valguses.
Furthermore, according to Germany, the construction of the two new fire station buildings was carried out in the fulfilment of activities falling within the public policy remit since according to settled Commission practice, measures relating to fire safety, especially the construction and operation of the airport fire station buildings and the procurement of the relevant equipment, are considered as falling within the public policy remit.
Saksamaa rõhutas, et kontrollpunkti ümberehitamise puhul on tegemist avalikes huvides täidetava ülesandega ja selle rahastamisel piirduti tekkinud kulude hüvitamisega.
Germany pointed out that the construction of a firefighting facility was usually publicly funded at German airports.
Saksamaa on lisaks arvamusel, et funktsionaalse turvahoone ehitamine (M9.2) kujutab endast avalikes huvides täidetavat ülesannet ja selle rahastamisel piirduti tekkinud kulude hüvitamisega.
Moreover, according to Germany the construction of the multi-purpose hangar was also carried out in the fulfilment of activities falling within the public policy remit since the hangar would be solely used for the storage of the winter service equipment and as an emergency shelter.
Saksamaa kinnitas, et uue funktsionaalse turvahoone ehitamine aitas saavutada ka vastavust määrusele (EÜ) nr 300/2008 ning oli vajalik föderaal- ja piirkondliku politsei, tolli ja Saksamaa meteoroloogiatalituse vajaduste rahuldamiseks.
Germany explained that the provision of premises for winter service equipment constitutes an official State function since it guarantees the safe operation of the airport during the winter period.
Seoses meetmega M9.3, mis puudutas tehniliste seadmete, st talviste teenuste osutamise täiendavate seadmete ja tuletõrje täiendava varustuse soetamist ning lennujaama piirdeaia varustamist detektorite ja digitaalse videovalvega, kinnitas Saksamaa, et kolme meetme puhul on tegemist avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannetega.
Germany explained that the provision of the emergency shelter falls within the general interest as it serves to safeguard human life.
Lisaks tõi Saksamaa esile, et vastavalt Saksamaa lennuohutuse seaduse (Luftsicherheitsgesetz) paragrahvile 8, millega kohaldati määrust (EÜ) nr 300/2008, pidi lennujaama ümbritsema piirdeaed.
Germany cited ICAO provisions that require airport managers to provide space for the treatment of wounded people and for the storage of dead bodies in the case of an emergency.
Saksamaa rõhutas, et komisjoni väljakujunenud tava kohaselt kuulub lennujaama julgeolekutaristu arendamine, nt piirdeaedade rajamine, avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannete hulka.
Moreover, according to Germany, the multi-purpose hangar can also accommodate passengers that cannot continue their journey due to natural phenomena (for example the ash cloud in 2010).
Seoses meetmega M9.4 (st transporditavate loomade jaoks uue veterinaarseadmetega varustatud hoone ehitamine) teatas Saksamaa ka, et kõnealuse hoone ehitamine kujutab endast avalikes huvides täidetavat ülesannet, kuna selle eesmärk oli tagada, et Saksamaale ja liitu ei tooda ühtegi loomataudi ega muud haigust.
Furthermore, Germany stressed that the construction of the new hangar was necessary since the enlargement of the multi-purpose hangar at its previous position would not have been possible.
Seoses meetmega M12 teatas Saksamaa, et õhuveonduse edasiseks arendamiseks ja õnnetuste ohu vähendamiseks maapinnal oli vaja planeerimisluba.
With regard to measure M6, Germany referred to the arguments in connection with M5.
Saksamaa tõi seoses meetmetega M11 ja M13–M16 esile, et ta ei väitnud oma teatises, et neid meetmeid teostati avalikes huvides täidetavate ülesannete raames.
Furthermore, Germany stated that the construction of the taxiway Victor had been postponed.
Saksamaa sõnul hõlmavad nimetatud meetmed kagutsooni avatud ala arendamist, põhja- ja idapoolse perrooni pikendamist, taristu kohandamist põhjatsoonis ja täiendavaid taristumeetmeid põhjatsoonis.
According to Germany the expansion of the de-icing areas (M7) was also conducted in fulfilment of an official State function as the facilities were required for operational safety and environmental reasons.
TARISTU RAHASTAMINE AKTSIONÄRIDE POOLT FLH-LE ANTUD LAENUDE KAUDU
Furthermore, Germany explained that the additional de-icing areas were not required to guarantee sufficient capacity in case of increasing traffic since Leipzig/Halle airport could handle increasing traffic even without additional de-icing areas.
Rahastamistingimused
It argued that the expansion of the de-icing areas became necessary as a result of the experiences during the winter operation 2008-09.
Saksamaa kinnitas seoses kõnealuste taristumeetmete rahastamisega, et meetmeid rahastati aktsionäridelt turutingimustes saadud laenudega ja seega ei ole ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 tähenduses tegemist riigiabiga.
According to Germany, the additional de-icing facilities serve to guarantee smooth de-icing of aircrafts and to prevent delays caused by inadequate de-icing infrastructure at the airport.
Saksamaa tõi esile, et nimetatud laenusid ei ole senini kapitaliks ümber arvestatud ja et selle ümberarvestamise peab komisjon enne heaks kiitma.
In this respect, Germany submitted that delays, in turn, would have a negative impact on the environment, such as kerosene consumption, harmful emissions and noise.
Saksamaa selgitas, et laenud on antud ehitusvajadustest lähtudes ja et nende kogusumma varieerub kuude lõikes.
Regarding measure M8, Germany argued that the construction of a heliport facilitates air rescue at the airport and in general.
Saksamaa kinnitusel algab laenu kestus kuupäevast, mil see välja makstakse.
Regarding M9.1, Germany stated that the rebuilding of Checkpoint 1 was absolutely necessary in light of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [22].
Saksamaa selgitas, et kõigi laenude tagasimakse tähtaeg on selle aasta lõpus (31. detsembril), mil nad anti.
Germany pointed out that this rebuilding falls within the public policy remit and that its financing was limited to the costs incurred.
Sellega seoses märkis Saksamaa, et nimetatud laene pikendati seejärel veel aasta võrra.
Additionally, Germany is also of the opinion that the construction of the functional security building (M9.2) fell within the public policy remit and that the financing was limited to the costs incurred.
Saksamaa väitel on laenude mitmekordsed pikendamised võimalikud seni, kuni komisjon kapitalisüstid eeldatavalt heaks kiidab.
Germany stated that the new functional security building also helped to comply with Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and was necessary to meet the needs of the federal and regional police, customs and the German Meteorological Service.
Saksamaa teatas veel, et laenusumma ja makstavad intressid tuleb maksta tähtaja lõppemisel (st iga aasta 31. detsembril), aga laenu kestust võib pikendada ühe täiendava aasta võrra.
Regarding M9.3 which concerned the procurement of technical equipment, that is to say the procurement of additional winter service equipment, of additional firefighting equipment and the retrofitting of the airport perimeter fence with detectors and digital video surveillance equipment, Germany argued that the three measures fell within the public policy remit.
Lisaks väitis Saksamaa, et pikendamise võimalus võimaldab pikendada laenu kuni selle päevani, mil komisjon oma lõpliku otsuse langetab.
Regarding the new winter service equipment, Germany stated that the equipment permitted that the runways can be cleared in parallel, what ensured a safe operation of the airport, and hence was falling within the public policy remit.
Saksamaa selgitas, et iga laenu intressimäär kehtestati iga osamakse tegemise ajal kohaldatava Euribori alusel, pluss riskimarginaal.
Moreover, Germany pointed out that according to §8 of the German Luftsicherheitsgesetz (Aviation Security Act, ‘LuftSiG’), which implemented Regulation (EC) No 300/2008, the airport had to be surrounded by a perimeter fence.
Saksamaa sõnul on 1. juulil antud laenu kestus (kuni aasta lõpuni) kuus kuud ja intressimäär võrdub 6 kuu Euribori ja riskimarginaali summaga.
Germany emphasised that according to settled Commission practice, the airport security infrastructure, such as perimeter fencing, falls within the public policy remit.
Saksamaa selgitas veel, et kui laen antakse 1. mail (kestusega 8 kuud kuni aasta lõpuni), siis arvutatakse aluseks võetav viitemäär 6 kuu ja 9 kuu Euribori määrasid interpoleerides.
Concerning measure M9.4 (that is to say the construction of a new animal transport building including veterinary facilities), Germany also submitted that the establishment of this building falls within the public policy remit, as it was aimed to ensure that no animal diseases or other illnesses were brought into Germany and the Union.
Saksamaa selgitas lisaks, et alates jaanuarist, mis järgneb aastale, mil laenu pikendati, võrdub intressimäär 12 kuu Euribori ja riskimarginaali summaga.
Regarding M12, Germany stated that in order to be able to further develop cargo traffic and to diminish the risk of accidents on the ground, the planning permission was needed.
Saksamaa esitas akumuleeritud laenusummadest ja -tingimustest ülevaate tabelis 3.
With regards to M11 and M13 to M16, Germany pointed out that it did not claim in its notification that these measures were implemented to carry out activities falling within the public policy remit.
Tabel 3
According to Germany, these measures included the land side development of the south-eastern zone, the northern apron expansion, the eastern apron expansion, infrastructure adaptation in the northern zone and additional infrastructure measures in the northern zone.
Ülevaade aktsionäride poolt FLH-le antud laenudest ajavahemikus 13.12.2006–1.1.2012
FINANCING OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH FLH’S SHAREHOLDER LOANS
Saksamaa 26. aprillil 2012. aastal esitatud teave, 14. lisa.
Financing conditions
Kuupäev
Regarding the financing of the infrastructure measures at stake, Germany stated that the measures were financed by shareholder loans which were granted under normal market conditions, and thus do not constitute State aid pursuant to Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Summa miljonites eurodes
Germany pointed out that these loans had so far not been converted into equity and that the conversion of the shareholder loans is subject to Commission’s approval decision.
(akumuleeritud)