natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall include two or more scheme operator public key certificates, with shifted validity periods of at least 3 months, which correspond to the private keys that can be used to sign or seal electronically the form suitable for automated processing of the trusted list and the human readable form when published.
Lõikes 1 osutatud teave sisaldab süsteemi käitaja vähemalt kahe avaliku võtme sertifikaate, mille kehtivusnihe on vähemalt kolm kuud ja mis vastavad privaatvõtmetele, mida saab kasutada e-allkirja või e-templi andmiseks usaldusnimekirjale automaatseks töötlemiseks sobivas vormingus ja inimestele loetavas vormingus, kui see avaldatakse.
Pursuant to Article 22(4) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, the Commission shall make available to the public, through a secure channel to an authenticated web server, the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, as notified by Member States, in a signed or sealed form suitable for automated processing.
Vastavalt määruse (EL) nr 910/2014 artikli 22 lõikele 4 teeb komisjon liikmesriikidelt saadud lõigetes 1 ja 2 osutatud teabe turvalise kanali kaudu autenditud veebiserveris avalikkusele kättesaadavaks e-allkirja või e-templiga varustatud vormingus, mis sobib automaatseks töötlemiseks.
The Commission may make available to the public, through a secure channel to an authenticated web server, the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, as notified by Member States, in a signed or sealed human readable form.
Komisjon võib teha liikmesriikidelt saadud lõigetes 1 ja 2 osutatud teabe turvalise kanali kaudu autenditud veebiserveris avalikkusele kättesaadavaks e-allkirja või e-templiga varustatult ja inimestele loetavas vormingus.
This Decision shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Käesolev otsus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides.
Done at Brussels, 8 September 2015.
Brüssel, 8. september 2015
OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73.
ELT L 257, 28.8.2014, lk 73.
Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market ( OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 36).
Komisjoni otsus 2009/767/EÜ, 16. oktoober 2009, millega kehtestatakse meetmed elektrooniliste haldustoimingute kasutamise lihtsustamiseks ühtsete kontaktpunktide kaudu, mis on sätestatud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivis 2006/123/EÜ teenuste kohta siseturul (ELT L 274, 20.10.2009, lk 36).
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR A COMMON TEMPLATE FOR TRUSTED LISTS
USALDUSNIMEKIRJADE ÜHTSE VORMI TEHNILISED NÕUDED
The trusted lists shall include both current and all historical information, dating from the inclusion of a trust service provider in the Trusted Lists, about the status of listed trust services.
Usaldusnimekirjad peavad sisaldama nimekirjas olevate usaldusteenuste staatuse kohta nii praegust kui ka kogu varasemat teavet alates usaldusteenuse osutaja usaldusnimekirja kandmisest.
The terms ‘approved’, ‘accredited’ and/or ‘supervised’ in the present specifications also cover the national approval schemes but additional information on the nature of any such national schemes will be provided by Member States in their trusted list, including clarification on the possible differences with the supervision schemes applied to qualified trust service providers and the qualified trust services they provide.
Käesolevas kirjelduses hõlmavad terminid „heakskiidetud”, „akrediteeritud” ja/või „järelevalvealune” ka riikide heakskiitmissüsteeme, kuid lisateabe selliste võimalike riiklike süsteemide kohta esitavad liikmesriigid oma usaldusnimekirjades, lisades selgitused võimalike erinevuste kohta, võrreldes kvalifitseeritud usaldusteenuste osutajate ja nende osutatavate usaldusteenuste suhtes kohaldatavate järelevalvesüsteemidega.
The information provided in the trusted list is primarily aimed at supporting the validation of qualified trust service tokens, i.e. physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the use of a qualified trust service, e.g. namely qualified electronic signatures/seals, advanced electronic signatures/seals supported by a qualified certificate, qualified time-stamps, qualified electronic delivery evidences, etc.
Usaldusnimekirjas esitatud teabe peamine eesmärk on toetada kvalifitseeritud usaldusteenuste märkide valideerimist.
CHAPTER II
Nende märkide hulka kuuluvad füüsilised või binaarsed (loogilised) objektid, mis on loodud või väljastatud kvalifitseeritud usaldusteenuse kasutamise tulemusena, nt kvalifitseeritud e-allkirjad/e-templid, täiustatud e-allkirjad/e-templid, mida toetab kvalifitseeritud sertifikaat, kvalifitseeritud ajatemplid, kvalifitseeritud elektroonilise edastamise tõendid jms.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COMMON TEMPLATE FOR THE TRUSTED LISTS
II PEATÜKK
The present specifications rely on the specifications and requirements set in ETSI TS 119 612 v2.1.1 (here after referred to as ETSI TS 119 612).
USALDUSNIMEKIRJADE ÜHTSE VORMI ÜKSIKASJALIKUD NÕUDED
When no specific requirement is set in the present specifications, requirements from ETSI TS 119 612 clauses 5 and 6 shall apply in their entirety.
Käesolevad kirjeldused tuginevad standardis ETSI TS 119 612 v2.1.1 (edaspidi „ETSI TS 119 612”) sätestatud kirjeldustele ja nõuetele.
When specific requirements are set in the present specifications, they shall prevail over the corresponding requirements from ETSI TS 119 612.
Kui käesolevates nõuetes ei ole sätestatud erinõudeid, siis peab täielikult kohaldama ETSI TS 119 612 punktide 5 ja 6 nõudeid.
In case of discrepancies between the present specifications and specifications from ETSI TS 119 612, the present specifications shall prevail.
Kui käesolevates nõuetes on sätestatud erinõuded, peab neid käsitama vastavate ETSI TS 119 612 nõuete suhtes ülimuslikena.
Scheme name (clause 5.3.6)
Käesolevates nõuetes ja ETSI TS 119 612 nõuetes esinevate lahknevuste korral peab ülimuslikuks pidama käesolevaid nõudeid.
This field shall be present and shall comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.6 where the following name shall be used for the scheme:
Scheme name (punkt 5.3.6)
‘EN_name_value’
See väli on kohustuslik ja peab vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.6 nõuetele, kusjuures süsteemi puhul peab kasutama järgmist nime:
‘Trusted list including information related to the qualified trust service providers which are supervised by the issuing Member State, together with information related to the qualified trust services provided by them, in accordance with the relevant provisions laid down in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC.’
„EN_name_value”
Scheme information URI (clause 5.3.7)
„Trusted list including information related to the qualified trust service providers which are supervised by the issuing Member State, together with information related to the qualified trust services provided by them, in accordance with the relevant provisions laid down in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC.”
This field shall be present and shall comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.7 where the ‘appropriate information about the scheme’ shall include as a minimum:
Scheme information URI (punkt 5.3.7)
Introductory information common to all Member States with regard to the scope and context of the trusted list, the underlying supervision scheme and when applicable national approval (e.g. accreditation) scheme(s).
See väli on kohustuslik ja peab vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.7 nõuetele, kus „asjakohane teave süsteemi kohta” peab sisaldama vähemalt järgmist.
The common text to be used is the text below, in which the character string ‘(name of the relevant Member State)’ shall be replaced by the name of the relevant Member State:
Kõigi liikmesriikide jaoks ühine tutvustav teave usaldusnimekirja ulatuse ja tausta, kasutatava järelevalvesüsteemi ja vajaduse korral riiklike heakskiitmissüsteemide (nt akrediteerimisüsteemide) kohta.
‘The present list is the trusted list including information related to the qualified trust service providers which are supervised by (name of the relevant Member State), together with information related to the qualified trust services provided by them, in accordance with the relevant provisions laid down in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC.
Ühine tekst, mida tuleb kasutada, on järgmine, kusjuures märgistringi „[asjaomase liikmesriigi nimi]” peab asendama asjaomase liikmesriigi nimega:
The cross-border use of electronic signatures has been facilitated through Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 which has set the obligation for Member States to establish, maintain and publish trusted lists with information related to certification service providers issuing qualified certificates to the public in accordance with Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures and which are supervised/accredited by the Member States.
„Käesolev nimekiri on usaldusnimekiri, mis sisaldab teavet [asjaomase liikmesriigi nimi] järelevalve all olevate usaldusteenuse osutajate kohta ja usaldusteenuste kohta, mida nad osutavad, kooskõlas Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 23. juuli 2014 aasta määruse (EL) nr 910/2014 (e-identimise ja e-tehingute jaoks vajalike usaldusteenuste kohta siseturul ja millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks direktiiv 1999/93/EÜ) asjaomaste sätetega.
The present trusted list is the continuation of the trusted list established with Decision 2009/767/EC.’
E-allkirjade piiriülesele kasutamisele aidatakse kaasa komisjoni 16. oktoobri 2009. aasta otsusega 2009/767/EÜ, milles on sätestatud liikmesriikide kohustus koostada, hallata ja avaldada usaldusnimekirju, mis sisaldavad teavet sertifitseerimisteenuse osutajate kohta, kes väljastavad üldsusele kvalifitseeritud sertifikaate vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 13. detsembri 1999. aasta direktiivile 1999/93/EÜ elektroonilisi allkirju käsitleva ühenduse raamistiku kohta ning kelle üle teostavad järelevalvet ja kelle akrediteerimisega tegelevad liikmesriigid.
Trusted lists are essential elements in building trust among electronic market operators by allowing users to determine the qualified status and the status history of trust service providers and their services.
Käesolev usaldusnimekiri on jätkuks otsusega 2009/767/EÜ kehtestatud usaldusnimekirjale.”
The trusted lists of Member States include, as a minimum, information specified in Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1505.
Usaldusnimekirjad on olulised komponendid, mis aitavad luua usaldust e-turul tegutsejate seas, võimaldades kasutajatel kindlaks teha, milline on usaldusteenuse osutajate ja nende teenuste kvalifitseeritud staatus praegu ja milline on see olnud varem.
It shall be clearly indicated that they are not qualified according to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
Liikmesriikide usaldusnimekirjad peavad sisaldama vähemalt komisjoni rakendusotsuse (EL) 2015/1505 artiklites 1 ja 2 osutatud teavet.
Member States may include in the trusted lists information on nationally defined trust services of other types than those defined under Article 3(16) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
Sellisel juhul tuleb selgelt märkida, et need ei ole kvalifitseeritud vastavalt määrusele (EL) nr 910/2014.
Specific information on the underlying supervision scheme and when applicable national approval (e.g. accreditation) scheme(s), in particular [1]:
Liikmesriigid võivad lisada usaldusnimekirja teavet muud liiki riigisiseselt kindlaksmääratud usaldusteenuste kohta kui need, mis on määratletud määruse (EL) nr 910/2014 artikli 3 lõike 16 alusel.
Information on the national supervision system applicable to qualified and non-qualified trust service providers and the qualified and non-qualified trust services they provide as regulated by Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
Konkreetne teave kasutatava järelevalvesüsteemi kohta ja vajaduse korral riiklike heakskiitmissüsteemide (st akrediteerimisüsteemide) kohta, eeskätt [1]:
Information, where applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation schemes applicable to certification-service-providers having issued qualified certificates under Directive 1999/93/EC;
teave riigisisese järelevalve süsteemi kohta, mida kohaldatakse kvalifitseeritud ja kvalifitseerimata usaldusteenuste osutajate ning nende osutatavate kvalifitseeritud ja kvalifitseerimata usaldusteenuste suhtes vastavalt määrusele (EL) nr 910/2014;
This specific information shall include, at least, for each underlying scheme listed above:
vajaduse korral teave riigisiseste vabatahtlike akrediteerimissüsteemide koha, mida kohaldatakse sertifitseerimisteenuse osutajate suhtes, kes on väljastanud kvalifitseeritud sertifikaate vastavalt direktiivile 1999/93/EÜ.
General description;
See konkreetne teave peab sisaldama iga eespool loetletud süsteemi kohta vähemalt järgmist:
Information about the process followed for the national supervision system and, when applicable, for the approval under a national approval scheme.
üldine kirjeldus;
Information about the criteria against which trust service providers are supervised or, where applicable, approved.
teave protsessi kohta, mida järgitakse riigisisese järelevalve süsteemi ja vajaduse korral riigisisese heakskiitmissüsteemi alusel heakskiitmise jaoks;
Information about the criteria and rules used to select supervisors/auditors and defining how they assess trust service providers and the trust services provided by them.
teave kriteeriumide kohta, mille alusel toimub usaldusteenuse osutajate järelevalve või vajaduse korral heakskiitmine;
When applicable, other contact and general information that applies to the scheme operation.
teave kriteeriumide ja õigusnormide kohta, mida kasutatakse järelevalve teostajate/audiitorite valikul ja selle kindlaksmääramisel, kuidas nad usaldusteenuse osutajaid ja nende osutatavaid usaldusteenuseid hindavad;
Scheme type/community/rules (clause 5.3.9)
vajaduse korral muud kontaktandmed ja üldteave süsteemi toimimise kohta.
This field shall be present and shall comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.9.
Scheme type/community/rules (punkt 5.3.9)
It shall only include UK English URIs.
See väli on kohustuslik ja peab vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.9 nõuetele.
It shall include at least two URIs:
Väljal esitatakse URId ainul Briti inglise keeles.
A URI common to all Member States' Trusted Lists pointing towards a descriptive text that shall be applicable to all Trusted Lists, as follows:
Esitatakse vähemalt kaks URI:
Descriptive text:
kõigi liikmesriikide usaldusnimekirjade jaoks ühine URI, mis viitab kirjeldavale tekstile, mida peab kasutama kõigi usaldusnimekirjade puhul järgmiselt:
‘Participation in a scheme
Kirjeldav tekst:
The “qualified” status of a trust service is indicated by the combination of the “Service type identifier” (“Sti”) value in a service entry and the status according to the “Service current status” field value as from the date indicated in the “Current status starting date and time”.
indicates that any end-entity certificate issued by or under the CA represented by the „Service digital identifier” („Sdi”) CA's public key and CA's name (both CA data to be considered as trust anchor input), is a qualified certificate (QC) provided that it includes at least one of the following:
A “CA/QC” “Service type identifier” (“Sti”) entry (possibly further qualified as being a “RootCA-QC” through the use of the appropriate “Service information extension” (“Sie”) additionalServiceInformation Extension)
and provided this is ensured by the Member State Supervisory Body through a valid service status (i.e. „undersupervision”, „supervisionincessation”, „accredited” or „granted”) for that entry.
indicates that any end-entity certificate issued by or under the CA represented by the “Service digital identifier” (“Sdi”) CA's public key and CA's name (both CA data to be considered as trust anchor input), is a qualified certificate (QC) provided that it includes at least one of the following:
and IF „Sie” „Qualifications Extension” information is present, then in addition to the above default rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of „Sie” „Qualifications Extension” information, constructed as a sequence of filters further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing additional information regarding their qualified status, the „SSCD support” and/or „Legal person as subject” (e.g. certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific „Key usage” pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
and provided this is ensured by the Member State Supervisory Body through a valid service status (i.e. “undersupervision”, “supervisionincessation”, “accredited” or “granted”) for that entry.
These qualifiers are part of the following set of „Qualifiers” used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding certificate content, and that are used respectively:
and IF “Sie” “Qualifications Extension” information is present, then in addition to the above default rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of “Sie” “Qualifications Extension” information, constructed as a sequence of filters further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing additional information regarding their qualified status, the “SSCD support” and/or “Legal person as subject” (e.g. certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific “Key usage” pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
„QCStatement” meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) qualified under Directive 1999/93/EC;
These qualifiers are part of the following set of “Qualifiers” used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding certificate content, and that are used respectively:
„QCForESig” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), is(are) qualified certificate(s) for electronic signature under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
“QCStatement” meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) qualified under Directive 1999/93/EC;
„QCForESeal” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), is(are) qualified certificate(s) for electronic seal under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
“QCForESig” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), is(are) qualified certificate(s) for electronic signature under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
„QCForWSA” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), is(are) qualified certificate(s) for web site authentication under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
“QCForESeal” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), is(are) qualified certificate(s) for electronic seal under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;
„NotQualified” meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) not to be considered as qualified; and/or
“QCForWSA” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), is(are) qualified certificate(s) for web site authentication under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
„QCWithSSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have their private key residing in an SSCD, or
“NotQualified” meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) not to be considered as qualified; and/or
„QCNoSSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have not their private key residing in an SSCD, or
“QCWithSSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have their private key residing in an SSCD, or
„QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), does(do) contain proper machine processable information about whether or not their private key residing in an SSCD;
“QCNoSSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have not their private key residing in an SSCD, or
„QCWithQSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have their private key residing in a QSCD, or
“QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), does(do) contain proper machine processable information about whether or not their private key residing in an SSCD;
„QCNoQSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have not their private key residing in a QSCD, or
“QCWithQSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have their private key residing in a QSCD, or
„QCQSCDStatusAsInCert” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), does(do) contain proper machine processable information about whether or not their private key is residing in a QSCD;
“QCNoQSCD” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), have not their private key residing in a QSCD, or
„QCQSCDManagedOnBehalf” indicating that all certificates identified by the applicable list of criteria, when they are claimed or stated as qualified, have their private key is residing in a QSCD for which the generation and management of that private key is done by a qualified TSP on behalf of the entity whose identity is certified in the certificate; and/or
“QCQSCDStatusAsInCert” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), does(do) contain proper machine processable information about whether or not their private key is residing in a QSCD;
„QCForLegalPerson” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), are issued to a Legal Person under Directive 1999/93/EC.
“QCQSCDManagedOnBehalf” indicating that all certificates identified by the applicable list of criteria, when they are claimed or stated as qualified, have their private key is residing in a QSCD for which the generation and management of that private key is done by a qualified TSP on behalf of the entity whose identity is certified in the certificate; and/or
if none of the id-etsi-qcs 1 statement, QCP OID or QCP+ OID information is included in an end-entity certificate, and
“QCForLegalPerson” meaning the identified certificate(s), when claimed or stated as qualified certificate(s), are issued to a Legal Person under Directive 1999/93/EC.
if no „Sie” „Qualifications Extension” information is present for the trust anchor CA/QC corresponding service entry to qualify the certificate with a „QCStatement” qualifier, or
if none of the id-etsi-qcs 1 statement, QCP OID or QCP + OID information is included in an end-entity certificate, and
an „Sie” „Qualifications Extension” information is present for the trust anchor CA/QC corresponding service entry to qualify the certificate with a „NotQualified” qualifier,