natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
CDP (2010b) Carbon Disclosure Project – Information Request Guide. CDP Water Disclosure, UK.
Carbon Disclosure Project – Information Request Guide, CDP Water Disclosure, CDP (2010b), Ühendkuningriik, 2010.
CE Delft (2010). Biofuels: GHG impact of indirect land use change.
Biofuels: GHG impact of indirect land use change, CE Delft (2010).
DEFRA (2009). Guidance on How to Measure and Report your Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
Guidance on How to Measure and Report your Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), London, 2009.
European Commission (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/pdf/com2011_571.pdf European Commission (2010).
Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, Euroopa Komisjon, 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/pdf/com2011_571.pdf.
Commission Decision of 10 June 2010 on guidelines for the calculation of land carbon stocks for the purpose of Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC (notified under document C(2010) 3751), Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels. European Commission (2012).
Euroopa Komisjon – Komisjoni otsus, 10. juuni 2010, juhendi kohta maa süsinikuvarude arvutamiseks vastavalt direktiivi 2009/28/EÜ V lisale (teatavaks tehtud numbri K(2010) 3751 all), Euroopa Liidu Teataja, Brüssel, 2010.
ISBN 978-92-79-19094-0, doi: 10.2788/39791. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
ISBN 978-92-79-19094-0, doi: 10.2788/39791, EC – IES – JRC, Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2010.
ISBN 978-92-79-17539-8, doi: 10.2788/38719. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
ISBN 978-92-79-17539-8, doi: 10.2788/38719, EC – IES – JRC, Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2010.
ISBN 978-92-79-19093-3, doi: 10.2788/39726. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
ISBN 978-92-79-19093-3, doi: 10.2788/39726, EC – IES – JRC, Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2010.
European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010e). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – Analysis of existing Environmental Impact Assessment methodologies for use in Life Cycle Assessment. First edition.
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – Analysis of existing Environmental Impact Assessment methodologies for use in Life Cycle Assessment.
Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010f).
First edition, EC – IES – JRC, Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2010.
ISBN 978-92-79-15861-2, doi: 10.2788/96557. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2011a). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Recommendations for Life Cycle Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors.
ISBN 78-92-79-15861-2, doi: 10.2788/96557, EC – IES - JRC Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2010.
ISBN 978-92-79-17451-3, doi: 10.278/33030.
ISBN 978-92-79-17451-3, digitaalobjekti identifikaator: 10.278/33030.
Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2011b). Analysis of Existing Environmental Footprint Methodologies for Products and Organizations: Recommendations, Rationale, and Alignment. EC – IES - JRC, Ispra, November 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/corporate_footprint.htm
Analysis of Existing Environmental Footprint Methodologies for Products and Organizations: Recommendations, Rationale, and Alignment, EC – IES - JRC, Ispra, november 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/corporate_footprint.htm.
Eurostat (2008). NACE Rev2. Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community, European Communities. Frischknecht, R., Steiner, R. and Jungbluth, N. (2008).
Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community, Euroopa Ühendused, 2008.
GRI (2006).
Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam, 2006.
Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G3). Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam.
Humbert, S., Geographically Differentiated Life-cycle Impact Assessment of Human Health.
Humbert, S. (2009). Geographically Differentiated Life-cycle Impact Assessment of Human Health. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA, 2009.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Volume 4 - Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. IGES, Japan.
Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Volume 4 - Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, International Resource Panel (IPCC), IGES, Jaapan, 2006.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). IPCC Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/assessments-reports.htm International Resource Panel (2011).
IPCC Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007, International Resource Panel (IPCC), 2007. www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/assessments-reports.htm.
Recycling rates of metal- a status report ISBN:978-92-807-3161-3 ISO. (2000).
Recycling rates of metal - a status report, International Resource Panel (IPCC), ISBN:978-92-807-3161-3, 2011.
Environmental labels and declarations – General principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO. (2006a).
Environmental labels and declarations – General principles, ISO (2000), International Organization for Standardization, Genf, 2000.
Environmental labels and declarations - Type III environmental declarations - Principles and procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO. (2006b).
Environmental labels and declarations - Type III environmental declarations - Principles and procedures, ISO (2006a), International Organization for Standardization, Genf, 2006.
Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO. (2006c).
Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, ISO (2006b), International Organization for Standardization, Genf, 2006.
Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO. (2006d).
Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, ISO (2006c), International Organization for Standardization, Genf, 2006.
Greenhouse gases – Part 1: Specification with Guidance at the Organization Level for Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO. (2006e).
Greenhouse gases – Part 1: Specification with Guidance at the Organization Level for Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals, ISO (2006d), International Organization for Standardization, Genf, 2006.
Greenhouse gases – Part 3: Specification with Guidance at the Validation and Verification of Greenhouse Gas Assertions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Greenhouse gases – Part 3: Specification with Guidance at the Validation and Verification of Greenhouse Gas Assertions, ISO (2006e), International Organization for Standardization, Genf, 2006.
ISO/WD TR 14069: Greenhouse gases (GHG) – Quantification and reporting of GHG emissions for organizations (Carbonfootprint of organization) – Guidance for the application of ISO 14064-1, under development. Milà i Canals, L., Romanyà, J. and Cowell, S.J. (2007). Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).
ISO/WD TR 14069: Greenhouse gases (GHG) – Quantification and reporting of GHG emissions for organizations (Carbonfootprint of organization) – Guidance for the application of ISO 14064-1, tööversioon.
J Clean Prod 15 1426-1440 Posch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J.P., Johansson, M., Margni M. and Jolliet, O. (2008). The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA.
Milà i Canals, L., Romanyà, J. ja Cowell, S.J., „Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)”, J Clean Prod, nr 15, 2007, lk 1426–1440.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (13) pp.477–486 Rosenbaum, R.K., Bachmann, T.M., Gold, L.S., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Köhler, A., Larsen, H.F., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., McKone, T.E., Payet, J., Schuhmacher, M., van de Meent, D. and Hauschild, M.Z. (2008). USEtox - The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment.
Posch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J.P., Johansson, M., Margni M. ja Jolliet, O., „The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, nr 13, 2008, lk 477–486.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(7): 532-546, 2008 Seppälä, J., Posch, M., Johansson, M. and Hettelingh, J.P. (2006). Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator.
Rosenbaum, R.K., Bachmann, T.M., Gold, L.S., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Köhler, A., Larsen, H.F., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., McKone, T.E., Payet, J., Schuhmacher, M., van de Meent, D. ja Hauschild, M.Z., „USEtox - The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, nr 13(7), 2008, lk 532–546.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(6): 403-416. Struijs, J., Beusen, A., van Jaarsveld, H. and Huijbregts, M.A.J. (2009). Aquatic Eutrophication.
Seppälä, J., Posch, M., Johansson, M. ja Hettelingh, J.P., „Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, nr 11(6), 2006, lk 403–416.
van Oers, L., de Koning, A., Guinee, J.B. and Huppes, G. (2002). Abiotic Resource Depletion in LCA. Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, Ministry of Transport and Water, Amsterdam. Van Zelm, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Den Hollander, H.A., Van Jaarsveld, H.A., Sauter, F.J., Struijs, J., Van Wijnen, H.J. and Van de Meent, D. (2008). European characterisation factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment.
van Oers, L., de Koning, A., Guinee, J.B. ja Huppes, G., „Abiotic Resource Depletion in LCA”, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, Ministry of Transport and Water, Amsterdam, 2002.
Atmospheric Environment 42, 441-453. Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. (1996).
Van Zelm, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Den Hollander, H.A., Van Jaarsveld, H.A., Sauter, F.J., Struijs, J., Van Wijnen, H.J. ja Van de Meent, D., „European characterisation factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment”, Atmospheric Environment, nr 42, 2008, lk 441–453.
Our Ecological Footprint. New Society Publishers, Canada. WMO (1999).
Wackernagel, M. ja Rees, W., Our Ecological Footprint, New Society Publishers, Kanada, 1996.
WRI and WBCSD (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: An Organisation Accounting and Reporting Standard. Revised Edition.
Revised Edition, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI and WBCSD), Genf, 2004.
World Resources Institute, Washington, DC and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva. WRI and WBCSD (2011a). Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard – Supplement to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, USA. (ISBN 978-1-56973-772-9). WRI and WBCSD (2011b). Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard – Supplement to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, World Resources Institute ja World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI and WBSCD), USA, 2011, (ISBN 978-1-56973-772-9).
Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, USA.
Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
(ISBN 978-1-56973-773-6).
Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard, World Resources Institute ja World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI and WBCSD), USA, 2011, (ISBN 978-1-56973-773-6). I
Review of Organisation inventory and reports. Selected independent external reviewers should review the study – ideally from the beginning.
Organisatsiooni andmiku ja aruannete läbivaatamine.Valitud sõltumatud väliskontrollijad peaksid uuringu läbi vaatama, soovitavalt algusest peale.
The principal target audience for this Annex are experienced Environmental Footprint practitioners and reviewers. This Annex is based on the “International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Nomenclature and other conventions”.
Käesoleva lisa koostamisel on aluseks võetud olelusringi rahvusvahelise andmesüsteemi (ILCD) käsiraamat nomenklatuuri ja muude kokkulepete kohta („International Reference Life cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Nomenclature and other conventions”) (Euroopa Komisjon – Teadusuuringute Ühiskeskus – Keskkonna ja Säästva Arengu Instituut, 2010f).
(EC – JRC – IES, 2010f). If further information and background is required on nomenclature and naming conventions, please refer to the afore mentioned document, which is available at: http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ .
Lisa- ja taustteavet nomenklatuuri ja kokkuleppeliste nimetuste kohta leiate allpool osutatud dokumendist, mis on kättesaadav aadressil: http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
“Country of production and previous LU are known: GHG emissions from LUC from a previous land use into the current one might be found in Annex C, from the PAS 2050:2011 (BSI 2011). For the emissions not listed in Annex C, the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories should be used” (BSI 2011). “Country of production is known and previous LU is unknown: GHG emissions shall be the estimate of LUC average emissions for that crop in that country” (BSI 2011). “Country of production and previous LU are unknown: GHG emissions shall be the weighted average LUC emissions of that specific commodity in the countries in which it is grown” (BSI 2011). General GHG emissions and removals to be included in the assessment
PAS 2050:2011 (BSI 2011) kohaselt tuleb hindamisse kaasata järgmised heitkogused ja sidumine.
Gases included in Annex A of the PAS 2050:2011 (BSI 2011); OBS: Some exceptions may apply for biogenic carbon emissions and removals related to food and animal feed products.
Toiduainete ja loomasöödaga seotud bioloogilise süsiniku heite ja sidumise suhtes võidakse kohaldada erandeid (vt punkt 5.11, lk 9, PAS 2050:2011).
(EC-IES-JRC, 2011b) Comparison of key requirements: OEF Guide vs. other methods
Organisatsiooni keskkonnajalajälje leidmise juhendi ja muude meetodite peamiste nõuete võrdlus
Recommends the calculation of 95 % confidence intervals. Spreadsheet calculators provided for uncertainty estimates.
Arvutamiseks soovitataks 95 % usaldusvahemik Määramatuse hindamiseks pakutakse tabelarvutusprogramme.
on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union Law
ühiste põhimõtete kohta, mida kohaldatakse liikmesriikide keelava iseloomuga ja kahju hüvitamisele suunatud kollektiivsete õiguskaitsevahendite suhtes ELi õigusest tulenevate õiguste rikkumise puhul
The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice, inter alia, by facilitating access to justice, as well as the objective of ensuring a high level of consumer protection.
Liit on seadnud endale eesmärgiks hoida ja arendada vabadusel, turvalisusel ja õigusel rajanevat ala, muu hulgas soodustades õiguskaitse kättesaadavust, ning tagada samal ajal tarbijakaitse kõrge taseme.
The modern economy sometimes creates situations in which a large number of persons can be harmed by the same illegal practices relating to the violation of rights granted under Union law by one or more traders or other persons (‘mass harm situation’).
Tänapäeva majanduses tekib aeg-ajalt olukordi, kus ühe või mitme ettevõtja või muu isiku sama ebaseaduslik tegevus võib tekitada kahju paljudele isikutele, rikkudes nende ELi õigusest tulenevaid õigusi (massikahju).
They may therefore have cause to seek the cessation of such practices or to claim damages.
Seetõttu võib neil isikutel olla õigus nõuda sellise tegevuse lõpetamist või kahju hüvitamist.
The Commission adopted a Green Paper on antitrust damages actions in 2005 [1] and a White Paper in 2008, which included policy suggestions on antitrust-specific collective redress [2].
Komisjon võttis 2005. aastal vastu rohelise raamatu, mis käsitleb EÜ konkurentsieeskirjade rikkumisest tekkinud kahjude hüvitamist, [1] ja 2008. aastal valge raamatu, mis sisaldas soovitusi meetmeteks konkurentsieeskirjade rikkumisest tekkinud kahju hüvitamise kohta [2].
In 2008 the Commission published a Green Paper on consumer collective redress [3].
2008. aastal andis komisjon välja ka rohelise raamatu, mis käsitles kollektiivse hüvitamise mehhanisme tarbija jaoks [3].
In 2011 the Commission carried out a public consultation ‘Towards a more coherent European approach to collective redress’ [4].
2011. aastal korraldas komisjon avaliku konsultatsiooni „Euroopa ühtne lähenemisviis kollektiivse hüvitamise mehhanismidele” [4].
On 2 February 2012 the European Parliament adopted the resolution ‘Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress’, in which it called for any proposal in the field of collective redress to take the form of a horizontal framework including a common set of principles providing uniform access to justice via collective redress within the Union and specifically but not exclusively dealing with the infringement of consumer rights.
Euroopa Parlament võttis 2. veebruaril 2012 vastu resolutsiooni „Euroopa ühtne lähenemisviis ühistele kahjunõuetele”, milles nõudis, et kollektiivset õiguskaitset käsitlev ettepanek kujutaks endast valdkonnaülest raamistikku, mis sisaldab ühiseid põhimõtteid, mis tagavad õiguskaitse ühtse kättesaadavuse ELis kollektiivse õiguskaitse kaudu, ning käsitleb eelkõige, kuid mitte ainult, tarbija õiguste rikkumisi.
The Parliament also stressed the need to take due account of the legal traditions and legal orders of the individual Member States and enhance the coordination of good practices between Member States [5].
Parlament rõhutas ka vajadust võtta arvesse eri liikmesriikide õigustraditsioone ja õiguskordi ning tõhustada heade tavade koordineerimist ja vahetamist liikmesriikide vahel [5].
On 11 June 2013 the Commission issued a Communication ‘Towards a European Horizontal Framework for Collective Redress’ [6], which took stock of the actions to date and the opinions of stakeholders and of the European Parliament, and presented the Commission’s position on some central issues regarding collective redress.
Komisjon võttis 11. juunil 2013 vastu teatise „Euroopa horisontaalne kollektiivse õiguskaitse raamistik” [6], milles analüüsiti seni võetud meetmeid, huvirühmade ja Euroopa Parlamendi arvamusi ning esitati komisjoni seisukoht mõningate kollektiivse õiguskaitsega seotud oluliste küsimuste kohta.
It is a core task of public enforcement to prevent and punish the violations of rights granted under Union law.
Avaliku võimu üks peamisi ülesandeid on hoida ära isikute ELi õigusest tulenevate õiguste rikkumisi ja määrata rikkumiste eest karistusi.
The possibility for private persons to pursue claims based on violations of such rights supplements public enforcement.
Eraisikud, kes ELi õigusest tulenevate õiguste rikkumise korral enda kaitseks hagi esitavad, täiendavad riigi tegevust eelnimetatud õiguste tagamisel.
Where this Recommendation refers to the violation of rights granted under Union Law, it covers all the situations where the breach of rules established at Union level has caused or is likely to cause prejudice to natural and legal persons.
Kui käesolevas soovituses viidatakse ELi õigusest tulenevate õiguste rikkumisele, mõeldakse mis tahes olukorda, kus liidu tasandil kehtestatud õigusnormide rikkumisega on kahjustatud või tõenäoliselt kahjustatakse füüsiliste või juriidiliste isikute huve.
Amongst those areas where the supplementary private enforcement of rights granted under Union law in the form of collective redress is of value, are consumer protection, competition, environment protection, protection of personal data, financial services legislation and investor protection.
Eraisikute sekkumisel oma ELi õigusest tulenevate õiguste kaitseks kollektiivsete õiguskaitsevahendite abil on avaliku võimu tegevusega võrreldes lisaväärtus sellistes valdkondades nagu tarbijakaitse, konkurents, keskkonnakaitse, isikuandmete kaitse, finantsteenuste reguleerimine ja investorikaitse.
The principles set out in this Recommendation should be applied horizontally and equally in those areas but also in any other areas where collective claims for injunctions or damages in respect of violations of the rights granted under Union law would be relevant.
Käesolevas soovituses esitatud põhimõtteid tuleks kohaldada valdkonnaüleselt ja võrdselt nimetatud valdkondades, kuid ka muudes valdkondades, kus kollektiivne õiguskaitse ELi õigusest tulenevaid õigusi rikkuva tegevuse lõpetamiseks ja sellise tegevuse tõttu tekkinud kahju hüvitamiseks oleks asjakohane.
Individual actions, such as the small claims procedure for consumer cases, are the usual tools to address disputes to prevent harm and also to claim for compensation.
Tavaliselt kasutatakse vaidluste lahendamisel kahju tekkimise vältimiseks ja hüvitise taotlemiseks eraldi hagisid, nagu näiteks väiksemate kohtuvaidluste menetluses tarbijakaitseasjade puhul.
In addition to individual redress, different types of collective redress mechanisms have been introduced by all Member States.
Lisaks üksikisikute kasutatavatele õiguskaitsevahenditele on kõik liikmesriigid ette näinud võimaluse kasutada ühte või teist liiki kollektiivseid õiguskaitsevahendeid.
These measures are intended to prevent and stop unlawful practices as well as to ensure that compensation can be obtained for the detriment caused in mass harm situations.
Nende meetmete eesmärk on ebaseaduslikku tegevust ära hoida või see peatada või tagada võimalus saada hüvitist olukorras, kus on tekitatud massikahju.
The possibility of joining claims and pursuing them collectively may constitute a better means of access to justice, in particular when the cost of individual actions would deter the harmed individuals from going to court.
Nõuete liitmise ja nende kollektiivse esitamise võimalus võib muuta õiguskaitse paremini kättesaadavaks, eriti juhul, kui kahju kannatanud isik jätaks kulude tõttu eraldi nõude kohtusse esitamata.