natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A similar provision can apply to certification services issuing non-qualified certificates (of a ‘CA/PKC’ service type).
Samalaadset nõuet võib kohaldada mittekvalifitseeritud sertifikaate (CA/PKC (avaliku võtme sertifikaat – Public Key Certificate) teenuse tüüpi) väljastavate sertifitseerimisteenuste suhtes.
The Trusted List shall include certificate validity status services when related location information for such services is not present in the end-entity certificates to which the certificate validity status services apply.
Usaldusnimekiri peab sisaldama sertifikaadi kehtivuse alaseid teenuseid, kui nende teenuste asukohta käsitlev asjakohane teave puudub lõppsertifikaatidel, mille suhtes sertifikaadi kehtivuse alaseid teenuseid kohaldatakse.
Certification Service Provider
Sertifitseerimisteenuste osutaja
As defined in Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 11.
a certification service provider that creates and assigns public key certificates; or
Sertifitseerimisteenuste osutaja, kes loob ja määrab avaliku võtme sertifikaate, või
a technical certificate generation service that is used by a certification service provider that creates and assign public key certificates.
tehniline sertifikaadi loomise teenus, mida kasutab sertifitseerimisteenuste osutaja, kes loob ja määrab avaliku võtme sertifikaate.
NOTE: See clause 4 of EN 319 411-2 [11] for further explanation of the concept of certification authority.
MÄRKUS: vt sertifitseerimisasutuse mõiste täpsem selgitus standardi EN 319 411-2 [11] punktis 4.
A CA who meets the requirements laid down in Annex II of Directive 1999/93/EC and issues qualified certificates meeting the requirements laid down in Annex I of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Sertifitseerimisasutus, mis vastab direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ II lisas sätestatud nõuetele ja väljastab kvalifitseeritud sertifikaate, mis vastavad direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ I lisas sätestatud nõuetele.
As defined in Article 2(9) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 9.
As defined in Article 2(10) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 10.
As defined in Article 2(3) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 3.
Refers to supervision provided for in Article 3(3) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
See viitab direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 3 lõikes 3 sätestatud järelevalvele.
Directive 1999/93/EC requires Member States to establish an appropriate system allowing the supervision of CSPs which are established on their territory and issue qualified certificates to the public, ensuring the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in that Directive.
Direktiivis 1999/93/EÜ on nõutud, et liikmesriigid kehtestaksid sobiva süsteemi, mis võimaldab valvata riigi territooriumil asuvate ja üldsusele kvalifitseeritud sertifikaate väljastavate CSPde järele, tagades direktiivis sätestatud nõuete täitmise järelevalve.
As defined in Article 2(13) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 13.
Designates the list indicating the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Services Providers who are supervised/accredited by the referenced Member State for compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nimekiri, mis näitab selliste sertifitseerimisteenuste osutajate poolt osutatavate sertifitseerimisteenuste järelevalve-/akrediteerimisolekut, kelle järelevalvet asjaomane liikmesriik teostab või kelle ta on akrediteerinud, et tagada direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ sätete järgimine.
Form of a signed list used as the basis for presentation of trust service status information according to the specifications laid down in the ETSI TS 119 612.
Allkirjastatud nimekirja vorm, mida kasutatakse usaldusteenuse oleku kohta teabe esitamise alusena vastavalt ETSI TS 119 612 nõuetele.
Service which enhances trust and confidence in electronic transactions (typically, but not necessarily, using cryptographic techniques or involving confidential material) (ETSI TS 119 612).
Teenus, mis suurendab usaldust ja kindlust elektrooniliste tehingute suhtes (mille puhul kasutatakse tavaliselt, kuid mitte tingimata, krüpteerimistehnikaid või mis on seotud konfidentsiaalse materjaliga) (ETSI TS 119 612).
NOTE: This term is used with a broader application than certification service issuing certificates or providing other services related to electronic signatures.
MÄRKUS: seda terminit kasutatakse laiemas tähenduses kui terminit „sertifitseerimisteenus”, mis hõlmab sertifikaatide väljastamist või muude elektrooniliste allkirjadega seotud teenuste osutamist.
Body operating one or more (electronic) Trust Services (This term is used with a broader application than CSP).
Asutus, mis osutab ühte või mitut (elektroonilist) usaldusteenust. (Seda terminit kasutatakse laiemas tähenduses kui terminit „CSP”.)
Examples of binary TrSTs are certificates, Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), Time Stamp Tokens (TSTs) and Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses.
Binaarsed TrSTd on näiteks sertifikaadid, sertifikaaditühistusnimistud (CRLd), ajatemplid ja OCSP kehtivuskinnitused.
An AdES supported by a QC and which is created by a secure signature creation device as defined in Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kvalifitseeritud sertifikaadiga toetatav täiustatud elektrooniline allkiri, mis on loodud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artiklis 2 määratletud turvalise allkirja andmise vahendiga.
As defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 2.
Means an Electronic Signature that meets the requirements of an AdES and is supported by a QC as defined in Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Elektrooniline allkiri, mis vastab AdESi nõuetele ja mida toetab direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artiklis 2 määratletud QC.
As defined in Article 2(6) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nagu on määratletud direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 2 punktis 6.
Within the following chapters, the key words ‘MUST’, ‘MUST NOT’, ‘REQUIRED’, ‘SHALL’, ‘SHALL NOT’, ‘SHOULD’, ‘SHOULD NOT’, ‘RECOMMENDED’, ‘MAY’, and ‘OPTIONAL’ are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [12].
Dokumendi järgmistes peatükkides tuleb võtmesõnu „TULEB”, „EI TOHI”, „KOHUSTUSLIK”, „PEAB”, „EI PEA”, „PEAKS”, „EI TOHIKS”, „SOOVITATAV”, „VÕIB” ja „VALIKULINE” tõlgendada vastavalt kommentaarinõudes (Request for Comments – RFC) 2119 [12] esitatud kirjeldusele.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COMMON TEMPLATE FOR THE ‘TRUSTED LIST OF SUPERVISED/ACCREDITED CERTIFICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS’
JÄRELEVALVEALUSTE/AKREDITEERITUD SERTIFITSEERIMISTEENUSTE OSUTAJATE USALDUSNIMEKIRJA ÜHTSE VORMI ÜKSIKASJALIKUD NÕUDED
The present specifications are relying on the specifications and requirements stated in ETSI TS 119 612 v1.1.1 (here after referred to as ETSI TS 119 612).
Käesolevad nõuded põhinevad tehniliste nõuete ETSI TS 119 612 punktis v.1.1.1 (edaspidi „ETSI TS 119 612”) sätestatud tingimustel ja nõuetel.
When no specific requirement is stated in the present specifications, requirements from ETSI TS 119 612 clauses 5 and 6 SHALL apply entirely.
Kui käesolevates nõuetes ei ole sätestatud erinõudeid, siis PEAB täielikult kohaldama ETSI TS 119 612 punktide 5 ja 6 nõudeid.
When specific requirements are stated in the present specifications, they SHALL prevail over the corresponding requirements from ETSI TS 119 612.
Kui käesolevates nõuetes on sätestatud erinõuded, PEAB neid käsitama vastavate ETSI TS 119 612 nõuete suhtes ülimuslikena.
In case of discrepancies between the present specifications and specifications from ETSI TS 119 612, the present specifications SHALL be the normative ones.
Käesolevates nõuetes ja ETSI TS 119 612 nõuetes esinevate lahknevuste korral PEAB normdokumendiks võtma käesolevad nõuded.
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.4.
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK ja PEAB vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.4 nõuetele.
A country MAY have separate Supervisory and Accreditation Bodies and even additional bodies for whatever operational related activities.
Riigil VÕIB olla eraldi järelevalve- ja akrediteerimisasutus ja isegi täiendavad asutused mis tahes seotud tegevuste elluviimiseks.
It is up to each Member State to designate the Scheme operator of the Member State Trusted List.
Iga liikmesriik määrab ise oma riigi usaldusnimekirja süsteemioperaatori.
It is expected that the Supervisory Body, the Accreditation Body and the Scheme Operator (when they appear to be separate bodies) will each of them have their own responsibility and liability.
Eeldatakse, et järelevalve- ja akrediteerimisasutusel ning süsteemioperaatoril (kui need on eraldiseisvad asutused) on igaühel oma vastutusvaldkonnad ja kohustused.
Any situation in which several bodies are responsible for supervision, accreditation or operational aspects SHALL be consistently reflected and identified as such in the Scheme information as part of the Trusted List, including in the scheme-specific information indicated by the ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7).
Iga selline olukord, kus järelevalve, akrediteerimise või operatiivküsimuste eest vastutab mitu asutust, PEAB olema järjekindlalt kajastatud ja sellisena tuvastatav usaldusnimekirja osaks olevas süsteemiteabes, sealhulgas väljal „Scheme information URI” (punkt 5.3.7) viidatud teabes süsteemi kohta.
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.6 where the following name SHALL be used for the scheme:
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK ja PEAB vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.6 nõuetele, kui süsteemi puhul PEAB kasutama järgmist nime:
‘Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers, which are supervised/accredited by the referenced Scheme Operator’s Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.’
„Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers, which are supervised/accredited by the referenced Scheme Operator’s Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.”
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.7 where the ‘appropriate information about the scheme’ SHALL include as a minimum:
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK ja PEAB vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.7 nõuetele, kui „asjakohane teave süsteemi kohta” PEAB sisaldama vähemalt järgmist:
Introductory information common to all Member States with regard to the scope and context of the Trusted List, and the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s).
kõigi liikmesriikide jaoks ühine tutvustav teave usaldusnimekirja ulatuse ja tausta ning selle aluseks oleva(te) järelevalve-/akrediteerimisüsteemi(de) kohta.
The common text to be used is the text below, in which the character string ‘[name of the relevant Member State]’ SHALL be replaced by the name of the relevant Member State:
Ühine tekst, mida tuleb kasutada, on järgmine, kusjuures märgistringi „[name of the relevant Member State]” PEAB asendama asjaomase liikmesriigi nimega:
‘The present list is the ‘Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers’ providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
„The present list is the „Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC,
listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC;
The applicable ‘supervision’ system (respectively ‘voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8(1), Article 11 (respectively, Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11).
The applicable „supervision” system (respectively „voluntary accreditation” system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8.(1), Article 11 (respectively, Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11).
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List at a national level on a voluntary basis.’
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List at a national level on a voluntary basis.”;
Specific information on the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s), in particular [13]: Information on the supervision system applicable to any CSPQC,
eriteave usaldusnimekirja aluseks oleva(te) järelevalve-/akrediteerimisüsteemi(de) kohta, eelkõige [13]: teave QCsid väljastava CSP suhtes kohaldatava järelevalvesüsteemi kohta;
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSPQC,
vajaduse korral teave QCsid väljastava CSP suhtes kohaldatava riikliku vabatahtlikkusel põhineva akrediteerimise süsteemi kohta;
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs.
vajaduse korral teave QCsid mitteväljastava CSP suhtes kohaldatava riikliku vabatahtlikkusel põhineva akrediteerimissüsteemi kohta.
This specific information SHALL include, at least, for each underlying scheme listed above:
Eriteave PEAB sisaldama iga eespool loetletud süsteemi kohta vähemalt järgmist:
General description,
üldine kirjeldus;
Information about the process followed by the Supervisory/Accreditation Body to supervise/accredit CSPs and by the CSPs for being supervised/accredited,
teave protsessi kohta, mida järgib järelevalve-/akrediteerimisasutus CSPde järelevalve/akrediteerimise korral ja mida järgivad CSPd nende järelevalve/akrediteerimise korral;
Information about the criteria against which CSPs are supervised/accredited.
teave kriteeriumide kohta, mille alusel CSPde järelevalvet teostatakse / neid akrediteeritakse;
Specific information, when applicable, on the specific ‘qualifications’ some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level including the meaning of such a ‘qualification’ and the associated national provisions and requirements.
vajaduse korral teave erikvalifikatsioonide kohta, millele mõnel sertifitseerimisteenuse osutamise tulemusel tekkival või väljastataval füüsilisel või binaarsel (loogilisel) objektil võib olla õigus, lähtudes selle vastavusest liikmesriigis kehtestatud normidele ja nõuetele, kusjuures see teave hõlmab ka sellise kvalifikatsiooni ja sellega seotud liikmesriigi normide ja nõuete tähendust.
Additional Member State specific information about the scheme MAY be provided on a voluntary basis such as:
Liikmesriik VÕIB vabatahtlikult esitada oma süsteemi kohta järgmist lisateavet:
Information about the criteria and rules used to select supervisors/auditors and defining how CSPs are supervised (controlled)/accredited (audited) by them,
teave kriteeriumide ja eeskirjade kohta, mida kasutatakse järelevalve teostajate / audiitorite valikul, ja selle kohta, kuidas nad CSPde järelevalvet teostavad (kontrollivad) / neid akrediteerivad (auditeerivad);
Other contact and general information that applies to the scheme operation.
muu kontakt- ja üldteave süsteemi toimimise kohta.
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.9 and SHALL include at least two URIs:
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK, PEAB vastama TS 119 612 punkti 5.3.9 nõuetele ning PEAB sisaldama vähemalt kaht URIt:
A URI common to all Member States’ Trusted Lists pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to all Trusted Lists, as follows:
kõigi liikmesriikide usaldusnimekirjade jaoks ühine URI, mis viitab kirjeldavale tekstile, mida PEAB kasutama kõigi usaldusnimekirjade puhul järgmiselt:
Each Member State must create a ‘Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers’ providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
Each Member State must create a „Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
The applicable ‘supervision’ system (respectively ‘voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8)(1), Article 11 (respectively, Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11).
The applicable „supervision” system (respectively „voluntary accreditation” system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8)(1), Article 11 (respectively, Article2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a ‘voluntary accreditation’ system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined ‘recognised approval scheme’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a „voluntary accreditation” system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined „recognised approval scheme” implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC).
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific ‘qualification’ on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a ‘qualification’ is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific „qualification” on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a „qualification” is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
A ‘CA/QC’‘Service type identifier’ (‘Sti’) entry (similarly a CA/QC entry further qualified as being a ‘RootCA/QC’ through the use of ‘Service information extension’ (‘Sie’) additionalServiceInformation Extension)
A „CA/QC”„Service type identifier” („Sti”) entry (similarly a CA/QC entry further qualified as being a „RootCA/QC” through the use of „Service information extension” („Sie”) additionalServiceInformation Extension)
indicates that from the ‘Service digital identifier’ (‘Sdi’) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the ‘Sdi’ identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate EN 319 412-5 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcCompliance, QcSSCD, etc.) and/or EN 319 411-2 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
indicates that from the „Service digital identifier” („Sdi”) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the „Sdi” identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate EN 319 412–5 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcCompliance, QcSSCD, etc.) and/or EN 319 411–2 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
Note: if no ‘Sie’‘Qualifications Extension’ information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not further identified through a related ‘Sie’‘Qualifications Extension’ information, then the ‘machine-processable’ information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
Note: if no „Sie”„Qualifications Extension” information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not further identified through a related „Sie”„Qualifications Extension” information, then the „machine-processable” information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
‘QCForLegalPerson’ qualifier value meaning ‘Certificate issued to a Legal Person’.
„QCForLegalPerson” qualifier value meaning „Certificate issued to a Legal Person”.
The general interpretation rule for any other ‘Sti’ type entry is that the listed service named according to the ‘Sn’ field value and uniquely identified by the ‘Sdi’ field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the ‘Scs’ field value as from the date indicated in the ‘Current status starting date and time’.
The general interpretation rule for any other „Sti” type entry is that the listed service named according to the „Sn” field value and uniquely identified by the „Sdi” field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the „Scs” field value as from the date indicated in the „Current status starting date and time”.