natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the conversion of the unpaid interest rates into a loan, the City of Mikkeli agreed to charge a very low interest rate for the loan.
Seoses tasumata intressi laenuks konverteerimisega oli Mikkeli linn nõus kohaldama laenu suhtes väga väikest intressimäära.
In fact, private creditors converting their unpaid interest rates negotiated higher interest rates, which led the Commission to question whether such an approach could have been in line with the market economy investor principle.
Tegelikult saavutasid tasumata intressi laenuks konverteerinud eraõiguslikud võlausaldajad läbirääkimiste käigus suuremad intressimäärad, millest tulenevalt komisjon kahtleb, kas selline lähenemisviis oli kooskõlas turumajandusliku investori põhimõttega.
Write-off of debts in the financial statements in 2006 and 2008 (measure 9 and measure 10)
Võlgade mahakandmine 2006. ja 2008. aasta raamatupidamisaruannetes (9. ja 10. meede)
In the second opening decision, the Commission considered that if the write-off of debts in the financial statements in 2006 and 2008 also included the legal obligation ceasing to exist, the write-off would confer an advantage to Karjaportti.
Teises menetluse algatamise otsuses leidis komisjon, et kui võlgade mahakandmine 2006. ja 2008. aasta raamatupidamisaruannetes hõlmas ka õiguslike kohustuste lõppemist, andis võlgade mahakandmine Karjaporttile eelise.
In the Commission's view it was questionable whether a private market investor would have acted in the same way.
Komisjoni seisukohast oli kaheldav, kas turumajanduslik erainvestor oleks käitunud samamoodi.
In the first opening decision, the Commission doubted that the City of Mikkeli would act like a private market investor when granting the guarantee and considered preliminarily that the guarantee entailed state aid.
Esimeses menetluse algatamise otsuses kahtles komisjon, kas Mikkeli linn tegutses garantiid andes turumajandusliku erainvestorina, ning leidis esialgu, et garantii hõlmas riigiabi.
As regards compatibility, the Commission had doubts whether the guarantee would comply with the R&R Guidelines 2004, as the "one time, last time principle" seemed not to have been met.
Seoses kokkusobivusega oli komisjonil kahtlusi selle suhtes, kas garantii vastab 2004. aasta päästmise ja ümberkorraldamise suunistele, sest ilmselt ei olnud täidetud ühekordse abi põhimõtet.
In addition, the guarantee fee and the interest rate for the loan were too low in order to satisfy point 25(a) of the Guidelines and the guarantee was not in line with point 25(c) of the Guidelines, as it was not limited to six months.
Peale selle olid garantiitasu ja laenu intressimäär liiga väikesed, et vastata suuniste punkti 25 alapunktile a, ning garantii ei olnud kooskõlas suuniste punkti 25 alapunktiga c, sest see ei piirdunud kuue kuuga.
In the first opening decision, the Commission doubted that the City of Mikkeli acted like a private market creditor when agreeing to the rescheduling of debts and considered preliminarily that the measure entailed state aid.
Esimeses menetluse algatamise otsuses kahtles komisjon, kas Mikkeli linn tegutses võlgade ümberkorraldamisega nõustudes eraõigusliku võlausaldajana, ning leidis esialgu, et meede hõlmas riigiabi.
As regards compatibility, the Commission had doubts whether the debt rescheduling would comply with the R&R Guidelines 2004, as the "one time, last time principle" seemed not to have been met.
Seoses kokkusobivusega oli komisjonil kahtlusi selle suhtes, kas võlgade ümberkorraldamine vastab 2004. aasta päästmise ja ümberkorraldamise suunistele, sest ilmselt ei olnud täidetud ühekordse abi põhimõtet.
In addition, the debt rescheduling did not meet the requirements for rescue aid.
Peale selle ei vastanud võlgade ümberkorraldamine päästmisabi suhtes kehtivatele nõuetele.
It was not limited to six months and was hence not in line with point 25(c) of the Guidelines.
See ei piirdunud kuue kuuga ega olnud seetõttu kooskõlas suuniste punkti 25 alapunktiga c.
Measures granted by Finnvera (measures 13-17)
Finnvera võimaldatud meetmed (13.–17. meede)
In the second opening decision, the Commission considered that the measures were granted through state resources and were imputable to the State, as Finland owns 100 % of Finnvera.
Teises menetluse algatamise otsuses leidis komisjon, et kõnealused meetmed anti riigi ressurssidest ja on seostatavad riigiga, sest Finnvera kuulub 100 % Soomele.
Concerning the loans, the Commission had doubts that the interest rate charged exceeded the relevant reference rates.
Seoses laenudega kahtles komisjon, kas kohaldatavad intressimäärad ületasid vastavaid viiteintressimäärasid.
In addition, it did not have sufficient information to assess whether the measures were granted together and at equal conditions with private investors.
Peale selle ei olnud komisjonil piisavalt teavet, et hinnata, kas meetmed anti koos erainvestoritega ja nendega samadel tingimustel.
Concerning the guarantees, the Commission had doubts that they were granted under existing schemes, as guarantees granted to a large company in difficulty would not fall under such schemes.
Garantiide puhul oli komisjonil kahtlusi seoses sellega, kas need anti kehtivate kavade alusel, sest suurele raskustes olevale äriühingule antavad garantiid ei jää selliste kavade raamesse.
If the measures were granted outside an existing aid scheme, the Commission doubted that they would comply with the market economy investor principle.
Kui meetmed anti väljaspool kehtivat abikava, kahtles komisjon selles, et need vastasid turumajandusliku investori põhimõttele.
Finland argues that the guarantee should not be considered state aid, as Karjaportti would probably have been able to acquire such a guarantee from private capital markets.
Soome väitel ei tuleks garantiid käsitada riigiabina, sest Karjaportti oleks tõenäoliselt suutnud saada samasuguse garantii erakapitaliturgudelt.
Finland refers to the fact that Tapiola granted the loan that was secured by the guarantee in question as part of a financing package of EUR 25 million for the investments in the Tikkala production site.
Soome viitab asjaolule, et Tapiola antud laen, mis tagati kõnealuse garantiiga, moodustas osa 25 miljoni euro suurusest rahastamispaketist, mis oli ette nähtud investeeringuteks Tikkala tootmisrajatisse.
Other parties contributed to the financing.
Rahastamises osalesid ka teised isikud.
State support for the investment consisted of the assignment of land and bearing the costs for the levelling of the site by the City of Mikkeli (see recitals 89 and 90), loans and guarantees granted by Finnvera as well as direct grants granted by the Ministry of Trade and Industry.
Riigi toetus kõnealusele investeeringule hõlmas Mikkeli linna poolset maa eraldamist ja kinnistu tasandamise kulude kandmist (vt põhjendused 89 ja 90), Finnvera antud laene ja garantiisid ning kaubandus- ja tööstusministeeriumi antud otsetoetusi.
In addition, Finland claims that the City of Mikkeli was treating all companies applying for guarantees on an equal basis.
Peale selle väidab Soome, et Mikkeli linn kohtles kõiki garantiisid taotlenud äriühinguid võrdsetel alustel.
If the measure was to be considered as state aid, Finland is of the opinion that such aid would have been compatible with the internal market as it was granted in accordance with Guidelines on national regional aid [36] ('the RAG 1998').
Kui meedet käsitatakse riigiabina, siis oli selline abi Soome arvamuse kohaselt siseturuga kokkusobiv põhjusel, et see anti kooskõlas piirkondliku riigiabi andmise juhendiga [36] (edaspidi „1998. aasta piirkondliku abi juhend”).
Large companies were eligible for regional aid measures under Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU if they did not exceed the amount of 24 % of the eligible net costs.
Suured äriühingud on ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti a alusel regionaalabi meetmete saamiseks abikõlblikud juhul, kui sellised meetmed ei ületa 24 % abikõlblikest netokuludest.
These conditions were met.
Need tingimused olid täidetud.
In particular, Finland provided a calculation according to which the gross grant equivalent would still remain under 24 % when taking into account all the state support for the investment.
Eelkõige esitas Soome arvutused, mille kohaselt brutotoetusekvivalent jääb alla 24 % ka juhul, kui arvesse võetakse kogu riigi toetust kõnealusele investeeringule.
Finland claims that the current book value of the plot is not a comparable indicator for the determination of the value of the plot at the time of the transfer.
Soome väidab, et maatüki praegune arvestuslik väärtus ei ole võrreldav näitaja, mille põhjal teha kindlaks maatüki väärtus selle üleandmise ajal.
Finland considers that the transfer of the plot of land and bearing the costs for levelling of the site has been in line with the RAG 1998 (see recital 87).
Soome on seisukohal, et maatüki üleandmine ja maa tasandamise kulude kandmine on kooskõlas 1998. aasta piirkondliku abi juhendiga (vt põhjendus 87).
According to Finland, the purchase of the properties in the year 2002 related to the construction project of the Tikkala production facility for which Karjaportti needed funding.
Soome sõnade kohaselt oli kinnistute ostmine 2002. aastal seotud Tikkala tootmisrajatise ehitusprojektiga, milleks Karjaportti vajas rahastamist.
Finland claims that the properties were bought at a market price.
Soome väidab, et kinnistud osteti turuhinnaga.
The evaluation took into account that the properties were purchased in order to turn them into predominantly residential use through an alteration of plans, while part of the area was still in business use.
Hindamisel võeti arvesse asjaolu, et kinnistud osteti eesmärgiga muuta need detailplaneeringu muutmise teel peamiselt elamumaaks, jättes samas teatava osa maast ärimaaks.
In addition, the properties were subject to mortgages given to private creditors and alone one of the six properties had a total mortgage of approximately EUR 9,6 million, which confirms that the value of the properties was higher than the purchase price.
Peale selle olid kinnistud kaetud eraõiguslike võlausaldajate suhtes seatud hüpoteekidega, kusjuures kuuest kinnistust ühele seatud hüpoteegi kogusumma oli ligikaudu 9,6 miljonit eurot, mis näitab, et kinnistute väärtus oli nende ostuhinnast suurem.
Hence, the City of Mikkeli respected the market economy investor principle and the purchase did not include state aid.
Seega järgis Mikkeli linn turumajandusliku investori põhimõtet ning maa ostmine ei kujutanud endast riigiabi.
When issuing the guarantee on 8 March 2004, the City of Mikkeli retained this security.
8. märtsi 2004. aasta garantiid andes säilitas Mikkeli linn selle tagatise.
Finland argues that the original guarantee was granted before Finland's accession to the EU.
Soome väitel anti algne garantii enne Soome ühinemist Euroopa Liiduga.
When the City of Mikkeli granted the new guarantee on 8 March 2004, no new aid was granted, as the existing original guarantee was converted into a new guarantee while retaining sufficient counter-securities.
Kui Mikkeli linn andis 8. märtsil 2004 uue garantii, ei antud sellega uut abi, sest kehtiv algne garantii muudeti uueks garantiiks, säilitades piisavad vastutagatised.
In addition, at the same time, also other guarantors of the original pension loan of 1992 granted loans to Karjaportti.
Peale selle andsid Karjaporttile samal ajal laenu ka teised 1992. aasta algse pensionilaenu garantiiandjad.
These conditions were met, as the aid element of the guarantee was only EUR 57835 whereas the overall investments of Karjaportti in Tikkala amounted to EUR […].
Need tingimused olid täidetud, sest garantii abielement oli ainult 57835 eurot, samas kui Karjaportti koguinvesteering Tikkalasse moodustas […] eurot.
Court supervised restructuring proceedings (measure 6)
Kohtu järelevalve all toimuv ümberkorraldamine (6. meede)
Finland argues that the measures taken were all related to the commencement of the court-supervised restructuring proceeding.
Soome väidab, et kõik võetud meetmed olid seotud kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamise alustamisega.
In accordance with the Court of Justice case-law, legislation on court-supervised recovery schemes and insolvency does not in itself justify treating that legislation as aid [37].
Kooskõlas Euroopa Liidu Kohtu kohtupraktikaga ei õigusta kohtu järelevalve all rakendatavaid taastumiskavasid käsitlevad õigusaktid iseenesest selliste õigusaktide käsitamist abina [37].
Second, no new loans were granted during the proceedings, but payment of debts granted prior to the restructuring was rescheduled in conformity with the national legislation on restructuring of enterprises, treating the creditors on an equal basis.
Teiseks ei antud menetluste käigus uusi laene, vaid vastavalt äriühingute ümberkorraldamist käsitlevatele siseriiklikele õigusaktidele korraldati ümber enne ümberkorraldamist antud võlgade tagasimaksmine, koheldes kõiki võlausaldajaid võrdsetel alustel.
In addition to the City of Mikkeli's receivables, receivables of private players were also rearranged during the proceedings.
Lisaks Mikkeli linna nõuetele korraldati ümber ka eraõiguslike osalejate nõuded.
The creditors of Karjaportti were divided into several groups.
Karjaportti võlausaldajad jagati mitmesse rühma.
The receivables of each group of creditors were subject to mutually equal and similar terms.
Iga võlausaldajate rühma nõuete suhtes kohaldati võrdseid ja ühesuguseid tingimusi.
Finland points out that this is in particular true as regards the secured debts of the City of Mikkeli.
Soome juhib tähelepanu asjaolule, et eelkõige kehtib see Mikkeli linna tagatud võlgade suhtes.
Hence, it seems that the City of Mikkeli has acted like a private market economy investor when agreeing to the court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
Seega tundub, et kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamisega nõustudes käitus Mikkeli linn turumajandusliku erainvestorina.
In addition, Finland points out that the City of Mikkeli had deemed it more profitable to reschedule the debts than to allow Karjaportti to go bankrupt and to close down permanently, which is also showed in a liquidation balance sheet attached to the restructuring programme.
Peale selle juhib Soome tähelepanu asjaolule, et Mikkeli linn pidas võlgade ümberkorraldamist kasulikumaks kui Karjaportti pankroti väljakuulutamist ja tema tegevuse alalist lõpetamist, mida tõendab ka ümberkorralduskavale lisatud likvideerimisbilanss.
As regards the compatibility of the measures under the R&R Guidelines 1999, Finland argues that a company subject to restructuring proceedings should generally be deemed as firm in difficulty within the meaning of the Guidelines.
Seoses meetmete kokkusobivusega 1999. aasta päästmise ja ümberkorraldamise suuniste alusel väidab Soome, et äriühingut, mille suhtes on käimas ümberkorraldusmenetlus, tuleks suuniste tähenduses üldiselt lugeda raskustes olevaks.
It then repeats that the restructuring proceeding did not involve state aid and that the City of Mikkeli did not carry out support measures during the restructuring proceedings.
Seejärel kordab Soome, et ümberkorraldamine ei hõlmanud riigiabi ning et Mikkeli linn ei rakendanud ümberkorraldamise ajal toetusmeetmeid.
Then Finland brings forward arguments relating to each of the measures granted: As regards the triggering of City of Mikkeli's guarantee for the loan granted in 2000, Finland argues that Mikkeli did not grant any new loans to Karjaportti, but simply stepped in as a creditor on the demand of Tapiola at the beginning of the court-supervised restructuring proceedings, which was an ordinary measure under such restructuring proceedings.
Järgnevalt esitab Soome argumendid iga võimaldatud meetme kohta. Seoses 2000. aastal saadud laenule antud Mikkeli linna garantii kasutamisega väidab Soome, et Mikkeli ei andnud Karjaporttile uusi laene, vaid lihtsalt vastas võlausaldajana Tapiola nõudmisele, mille viimane esitas kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamise alguses; tegemist on sellise ümberkorraldamise puhul tavapärase meetmega.
As regards the terms and conditions of the repayment of the loan, Finland points out that they had been specified in the restructuring programme and were equal for all creditors within the same group of creditors.
Seoses laenu tagasimaksmise tingimustega märgib Soome, et need olid täpsustatud ümberkorralduskavas ja võrdsed kõikide samasse võlausaldajate rühma kuuluvate võlausaldajate jaoks.
As regards the unpaid charges, Finland clarifies that the receivables are owed to the City property administration, the water management department and the waste management department of the City.
Seoses maksmata tasudega selgitab Soome, et kõnealused summad võlgnetakse linna kinnisvarahalduse, veemajanduse ja jäätmemajanduse osakondadele.
The receivables consist of unpaid charges that had arisen prior to the commencement of the court-supervised restructuring proceeding.
Nõuded hõlmavad enne kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamise algust tekkinud maksmata tasusid.
No guarantee was granted for those outstanding amounts by the City of Mikkeli, as they were receivables due to the City.
Mikkeli linn ei andnud nende maksmata summade kohta mingeid garantiisid, kuna tegemist oli linna nõuetega.
Hence, when the court-supervised restructuring proceedings started, they were entered into the restructuring programme as one sum.
Seega kui kohtu järelevalve all toimuv ümberkorraldamine algas, kanti need ümberkorralduskavasse ühe summana.
Finland claims that the shares of the real estate company Kiinteistö Oy Suksimäki were purchased at a market price from Karjaportti.
Soome väidab, et kinnisvaraettevõtte Kiinteistö Oy Suksimäki osakud osteti Karjaporttilt turuhinnaga.
Finland submitted an independent valuer’s statement according to which the value of the shares amounted to approximately EUR 1 million based on the prevailing rent level.
Soome esitas sõltumatu hindaja avalduse, mille kohaselt oli osakute väärtus kehtiva renditaseme põhjal ligikaudu üks miljon eurot.
Concerning the conversion of the unpaid interest into a loan, Finland firstly argues that the non-payment of interest rates is a typical measure to court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
Seoses tasumata intressi laenuks konverteerimisega väidab Soome kõigepealt, et intressi tasumata jätmine on kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamise puhul tavapärane meede.
The conversion of such unpaid interest into loans, which will be better ranked than other loans, is foreseen by Finnish legislation.
Sellise tasumata intressi konverteerimine laenudeks, mis on teiste laenudega võrreldes eelisolukorras, on ette nähtud Soome õigusaktidega.
In addition, Finland considers that the conversion of the unpaid interest into a loan was taken in accordance with the private market investor principle, as private creditors converted unpaid interest receivables into loans together with the City of Mikkeli.
Peale selle leiab Soome, et tasumata intressi laenuks konverteerimine toimus kooskõlas turumajandusliku erainvestori põhimõttega, sest koos Mikkeli linnaga konverteerisid saadaoleva tasumata intressi laenuks ka eraõiguslikud võlausaldajad.
Write-off of debts in the financial statements of 2006 and 2008 (measure 9 and measure 10)
Võlgade mahakandmine 2006. ja 2008. aasta raamatupidamisaruannetes (9. ja 10. meede)
Finland confirms that recording the debts as a loss is simply a bookkeeping operation on the creditor's part, done in accordance with the principle of prudence and the respective provisions in the Accounting Act 1336/1997.
Soome kinnitab, et võlgade kajastamine kahjumina on üksnes võlausaldaja poolne raamatupidamistoiming, mis teostati kooskõlas konservatiivsuse printsiibi ja raamatupidamisseaduse nr 1336/1997 vastavate sätetega.
Finland argues that the debt write-off does not affect the legal relationship between the creditor and the debtor, i.e. the debts were not waived.
Soome väitel ei mõjutanud võlgade mahakandmine võlausaldaja ja võlgniku vahelist õiguslikku suhet, st võlgade sissenõudmisest ei loobutud.
The City of Mikkeli has confirmed that it has not waived the debts recorded as losses and that it continues to pursue collection.
Mikkeli linn on kinnitanud, et ta ei ole kahjumina kajastatud võlgadest loobunud ja jätkab nende sissenõudmist.
The debt is part of the secured debt under the court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
Kõnealune võlg moodustab osa kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamisega seotud tagatud võlast.
Finland argues that rescheduling of debts is a measure inherent to court-supervised restructuring proceedings and does not involve state aid.
Soome väitel on võlgade ümberkorraldamine kohtu järelevalve all toimuva ümberkorraldamise olemuslik osa ega hõlma riigiabi.
According to Finland, the creditors of Karjaportti had a mutual understanding that the rescheduling of debts was a reasonable alternative in order to safeguard their receivables.
Soome sõnade kohaselt olid Karjaportti võlausaldajad üksmeelsel seisukohal, et võlgade ümberkorraldamine on mõistlik alternatiiv nende nõuete kaitsmiseks.
It informs the Commission that the notified rescheduling was never implemented, as the administrative court of Kuopio (Kuopion Hallinto-Oikeus) halted the implementation of the debt rescheduling.
Soome teatas komisjonile, et teatatud võlgade ümberkorraldamist ei toimunud, sest Kuopio halduskohus (Kuopion Hallinto-Oikeus) peatas selle rakendamise.
Finland explains that Karjaportti's debts were nevertheless rescheduled, following several proposals by Karjaportti in the period 2009–2011, which were accepted by the City of Mikkeli.
Soome selgitab, et sellele vaatamata toimus Karjaportti võlgade ümberkorraldamine pärast mitut ettepanekut, mille Karjaportti esitas aastatel 2009–2011 ning millega Mikkeli linn nõustus.
Finland claims that this subsequent rescheduling was in line with the market economy investor principle, as the City of Mikkeli and all other creditors implemented the rescheduling at equal terms.
Soome sõnade kohaselt oli see hilisem ümberkorraldamine kooskõlas turumajandusliku investori põhimõttega, sest Mikkeli linn ja kõik teised võlausaldajad korraldasid võlad ümber võrdsetel tingimustel.
First, Finnvera's risk was not increased, as the guarantee replaced a guarantee that Finnvera granted earlier (in 1992) for a pension loan.
Esiteks ei kasvanud Finnvera võetud risk, sest asjaomase garantiiga asendati Finnvera varem (1992. aastal) pensionilaenule antud garantii.
This loan was replaced by a new pension loan in 2004, for which Finnvera granted the guarantee in question.
See laen asendati 2004. aastal uue pensionilaenuga, millele Finnvera andis kõnealuse garantii.
Finally, the forecasts for Karjaportti were good at the time the guarantee was granted.
Lõpuks olid Karjaportti prognoosid garantii andmise ajal head.
Finland considers that the loan granted in 2006 did not involve state aid as Finnvera acted like a private market creditor when converting the unpaid interest into a new loan in line with the restructuring programme.
Soome leiab, et 2006. aastal antud laen ei hõlmanud riigiabi, sest Finnvera tegutses eraõigusliku võlausaldajana, konverteerides tasumata intressid kooskõlas ümberkorralduskavaga uueks laenuks.
In addition, private creditors converted their unpaid interest into new loans shortly before Finnvera did so and at similar conditions.
Peale selle konverteerisid eraõiguslikud võlausaldajad oma tasumata intressid samasugustel tingimustel uuteks laenudeks vahetult enne Finnverat.
Finland considers that the loan granted in 2007 did not involve state aid as Finnvera acted together with two private creditors who granted new loans at the same time and at similar conditions.
Soome seisukohast ei hõlmanud 2007. aastal antud laen riigiabi, sest Finnvera tegutses koos kahe eraõigusliku võlausaldajaga, kes andsid uued laenud samal ajal ning samasugustel tingimustel.
In addition, the loan was collateralised by way of valuable mortgages and business mortgages.
Peale selle oli laen tagatud väärtuslike hüpoteekide ja kommertspantidega.
The interested party only commented on measures 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 10.
Huvitatud isikud esitasid märkusi 1., 2., 3., 5., 7., 9. ja 10. meetme kohta.