natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
authorities responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates (in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 regarding access to the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) by the services in the Member States responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates [14]). In accordance with the SIS II Decision, Europol and Eurojust also have access to certain categories of alerts.
sõidukite registreerimistunnistusi välja andvad asutused (vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 20. detsembri 2006. aasta määrusele (EÜ) nr 1986/2006, mis käsitleb liikmesriikides sõidukite registreerimistunnistusi väljaandvate teenistuste juurdepääsu teise põlvkonna Schengeni infosüsteemile (SIS II)) [14].
In addition, according to the SIS II legal instruments, Member States shall exchange supplementary information related to the alert which is required for implementing certain provisions foreseen under the SIS II legal instruments, and for SIS II to function properly, either on a bilateral or multilateral basis. This structure, built to deal with the exchange of supplementary information, has been given the name ‘Sirene’, which is an acronym of the definition of the structure in English: Supplementary Information Request at the National Entries.
SIS II õigusaktide ühise artikli 7 lõike 2 kohaselt asutab iga liikmesriik riikliku SIRENE büroo.
It shall serve as a single contact point for the Member States, fully operational on 24/7 basis, for the purpose of exchanging supplementary information in connection with the entry of alerts and for allowing the appropriate action to be taken in cases where persons and objects have been entered in SIS II and are found as a result of a hit. The Sirene Bureaux’ main tasks include [15] ensuring the exchange of all supplementary information is in accordance with the requirements of this Sirene Manual, as provided in common Article 8 of the SIS II legal instruments for the following purposes:(a) in order to allow Member States to consult or inform each other whilst entering an alert (e.g. when entering alerts for arrest);
Vastavalt SIS II õigusaktide artiklile 8 on SIRENE büroode üks peaülesannetest [15] tagada täiendava teabe vahetamine vastavalt käesolevale SIRENE käsiraamatule järgmistel juhtudel:a) et võimaldada liikmesriikidel omavahel konsulteerida või üksteist hoiatusteate sisestamisest teavitada (nt vahistamist käsitleva hoiatusteate sisestamisel);
In exceptional cases where communication at national level concerning SIS II alerts is done by the ENU, all parties to the communication, especially the Sirene Bureau, should be made aware of this fact to avoid confusion.1.7. Relations between Sirene Bureaux and Eurojust
Vastavalt SIS II otsuse artiklitele 26, 32, 34 ja 38 on Eurojusti riiklikel liikmetel ja nende assistentidel juurdepääsuõigus SIS II sisestatud andmetele ning õigus neid infosüsteemis vahetult otsida.
In accordance with national law, cooperation with them should be established in order to ensure the smooth exchange of information in case of a hit. In particular, the Sirene Bureau should be the contact point for national members of Eurojust and their assistants for supplementary information related to alerts in SIS II.
Eelkõige peaks SIRENE büroo olema Eurojusti riiklikele liikmetele ja nende assistentidele kontaktpunkt SIS II hoiatusteadetega seotud täiendava teabe vahetamisel.
Before being authorised to process data stored in the SIS II, staff shall in particular receive appropriate training about data security and data protection rules and shall be informed of any relevant criminal offences and penalties. European level
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EL) nr 1077/2011 [21] artiklis 3 on sätestatud, et vabadusel, turvalisusel ja õigusel rajaneva ala suuremahuliste IT-süsteemide operatiivjuhtimise Euroopa amet (edaspidi „amet”) täidab SIS II puhul eelkõige SIRENE töötajate poolse tehnilise kasutuse alase koolitamisega seotud ülesandeid.
Common training courses shall be organised at least once a year, to enhance cooperation between Sirene Bureaux by allowing staff to meet colleagues from other Sirene Bureaux, share information on national working methods and create a consistent and equivalent level of knowledge. It will furthermore make staff aware of the importance of their work and the need for mutual solidarity in view of the common security of Member States.
Töötajate vahetus
The delivery of training should be in compliance with the Sirene Trainers Manual. Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [21] sets out that the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (the Agency) shall perform tasks relating to training on the technical use of SIS II, in particular for Sirene staff.1.17.5.
Kui võimalik, korraldavad SIRENE bürood teiste SIRENE büroodega töötajate vahetamise vähemalt kord aastas.
Exchange of staff As far as possible, Sirene Bureaux should also foresee setting up staff exchanges with other Sirene Bureaux at least once a year. These exchanges are intended to help improve staff knowledge of working methods, to show how other Sirene Bureaux are organised and to establish personal contacts with colleagues in other Member States.
Vahetuse eesmärk on parandada töötajate teadmisi töömeetodite kohta, näidata teiste SIRENE büroode tegevuse korraldust ning luua teiste liikmesriikide kolleegidega isiklikke kontakte.
Member State which entered the alert in SIS II; ‘Executing Member State’ Member State which takes the required actions following a hit;
selle liikmesriigi SIRENE büroo, kellel on selle isiku sõrmejäljed või fotod, kelle kohta sisestas hoiatusteate mõni muu liikmesriik (SIRPITi menetlus – vt punkt 2.13);
‘Providing Sirene Bureau’ Sirene Bureau of a Member State which has fingerprints or pictures of the person for whom an alert was entered by another Member State (Sirpit procedure — see Section 2.13);
„kokkulangevus”
‘Hit’ a hit occurs in SIS II when:
SIS II tuvastatakse kokkulangevus
Only one alert per Member State may be entered in SIS II for any one person or object. Therefore, wherever possible and necessary, second and subsequent alerts on the same person or object shall be kept available at national level so that they can be introduced when the first alert expires or is deleted.
Seetõttu töötatakse välja menetlused, mis aitavad avastada, kas ühe isiku või eseme kohta on esitatud korduvaid hoiatusteateid, ning luuakse tähtsuse järjekord, mille alusel saab hoiatusteateid SIS II sisestada.
Several alerts may be entered by different Member States for the same subjects. It is essential that this does not cause confusion to users, and that it is clear to them what measures must be taken when seeking to enter an alert and which procedure shall be followed when a hit occurs.
Selleks tuleb
Procedures shall therefore be established for detecting multiple alerts, as shall a priority mechanism for entering them in SIS II. This calls for:
enne hoiatusteate sisestamist kontrollida, kas isik või ese on juba SIS II sisestatud;
checks before entering an alert, in order to determine whether the subject is already in SIS II, consultation with the other Member States, when the entry of an alert causes multiple alerts that are incompatible.
konsulteerida teiste liikmesriikidega, kui hoiatusteate sisestamise tulemusena tekivad korduvad ühildumatud hoiatusteated ühe isiku või eseme kohta.
The data contained in SIS II may only be processed for the purposes laid down for each category of alert. However, if prior authorisation has been obtained from the issuing Member State, the data may be processed for a purpose other than that for which they were entered, in order to prevent an imminent serious threat to public policy and security, for serious reasons of national security or for the purposes of preventing a serious criminal offence. If a Member State intends to process data in SIS II for purpose other than that for which they were entered, the exchange of information shall take place according to the following rules:
Kui liikmesriik soovib töödelda SIS II sisestatud andmeid eesmärgil, mis ei ole eesmärk, milleks need SIS II sisestati, vahetatakse teavet järgmise korra kohaselt:
Cooperation, as appropriate, should be established to ensure that the Sirene Bureau of the issuing Member State is informed by their national FAST about any ongoing operation relating to an alert entered in SIS II. Where appropriate this Sirene Bureau shall provide this information to other Sirene Bureaux. The Sirene Bureaux shall ensure fast flow of supplementary information, including information on a hit, to the national FAST if the latter is involved in the search. 3. ALERTS FOR ARREST FOR SURRENDER OR EXTRADITION PURPOSES (ARTICLE 26 OF THE SIS II DECISION)
HOIATUSTEATED ISIKUTE ÜLE- VÕI VÄLJAANDMISE EESMÄRGIL VAHISTAMISEKS (SIS II OTSUSE ARTIKKEL 26)
For general rules see Section 2.6. If at least one of the EAWs attached to the alert can be executed, the alert shall not be flagged. As highlighted in Section 2.6, a flagged alert under Article 26 of the SIS II Decision shall, for the period of duration of the flag, be regarded as being entered for the purposes of communicating the whereabouts of the person for whom it was issued.
Nagu punktis 2.6 rõhutatud, käsitatakse SIS II otsuse artikli 26 kohast lipuga hoiatusteadet lipu kehtivuse ajal teatena, mille eesmärk on pakkuda teavet hoiatusteates osutatud isiku asukohast.
The Member State considering granting a residence permit or visa shall use an N form to inform the issuing Member State about the decision to grant the residence permit or visa. If the Member State decides to grant the residence permit or visa, the alert shall be deleted.
Elamisluba või viisat anda kavatsev liikmesriik teavitab hoiatusteate esitanud liikmesriiki elamisloa või viisa andmist käsitlevast otsusest, kasutades vormi N. Kui liikmesriik otsustab elamisloa või viisa anda, siis hoiatusteade kustutatakse.
The Member State which granted the residence permit or visa shall use an O form to inform the issuing Member State about the decision whether or not to withdraw the residence permit or visa. If this Member State decides to maintain the residence permit or visa, the alert shall be deleted.
Asjaomase isiku võib siiski kanda selle liikmesriigi sissesõidukeeldude registrisse.
It may also request to be informed of the result of any consultation. If the third-country national concerned tries to enter the Member State which has entered the alert in SIS II, his/her entry may be refused by this Member State.
Kuid pädeva ametiasutuse taotlusel konsulteerib selle liikmesriigi SIRENE büroo elamisloa või viisa välja andnud riigi SIRENE bürooga, et võimaldada pädeval asutusel välja selgitada, kas on alust elamisloa või viisa tühistamiseks.
The Member State which granted the residence permit or visa shall use an O form to inform the issuing Member State about the decision whether or not to withdraw the residence permit or visa. If this Member State decides to maintain the validity of the residence permit or visa, the alert shall be deleted. The person can, nevertheless, be put on a Member State’s national list of alerts for refusal of entry.
Asjaomase isiku võib siiski kanda selle liikmesriigi sissesõidukeeldude registrisse.
If the change of citizenship comes to the attention of a Sirene Bureau of a Member State other than the issuing one, the former shall consult the Sirene Bureau of the issuing Member State and, if needed, send a J form, in accordance with the procedure for rectification and deletion of data found to be legally or factually inaccurate (see Section 2.7). 5. ALERTS ON MISSING PERSONS (ARTICLE 32 OF THE SIS II DECISION)
HOIATUSTEATED TEADMATA KADUNUD ISIKUTE KOHTA (SIS II OTSUSE ARTIKKEL 32)
This decision may be taken even if the issuing Member State’s competent authorities decide to retain the alert in SIS II. In such circumstances the executing Member State may request a flag after the hit has occurred.
Lipu lisamisel järgitakse punktis 2.6 kirjeldatud üldmenetlust.
With a view to adding a flag, the general procedures as described in Section 2.6 shall be followed. There is no alternative action to be taken for alerts for missing persons.
Seoses teadmata kadunud isikute kohta esitatud hoiatusteadetega ei ole kehtestatud muid menetlusi.
However, many fixed ANPR sites are not constantly manned. Accordingly, although the technology will register the passage of the vehicle and a hit will be achieved, the requested action may not be undertaken.
Kuid mitte kõik ANPR-süsteemid ei ole pidevalt mehitatud, mistõttu ei saa võtta taotletud meetmeid hoolimata sellest, et tehnika abil registreeritakse sõiduki möödumine ja tehakse kindlaks kokkulangevus.
of 5 March 2013
5. märts 2013,
By letters registered with the Commission on 12 July 2012 and on 4 October 2012, the Kingdom of the Netherlands requested authorisation to introduce a special measure for derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the person liable for payment of value added tax (VAT).
Madalmaade Kuningriik taotles komisjonis 12. juulil 2012 ja 4. oktoobril 2012 registreeritud kirjadega luba kehtestada seoses käibemaksu tasumise eest vastutava isikuga erimeede, millega tehakse erand direktiivi 2006/112/EÜ artiklist 193.
In accordance with Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member States, by letter dated 17 October 2012, of the request made by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Vastavalt direktiivi 2006/112/EÜ artikli 395 lõikele 2 teavitas komisjon 17. oktoobri 2012. aasta kirjaga teisi liikmesriike Madalmaade Kuningriigi taotlusest.
By letter dated 19 October 2012, the Commission notified the Kingdom of the Netherlands that it had all the information it considered necessary to consider the request.
Komisjon teatas 19. oktoobri 2012. aasta kirjaga Madalmaade Kuningriigile, et tal on olemas taotluse hindamiseks kogu vajalik teave.
Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC provides that the taxable person supplying the goods or services is, as a general rule, liable for the payment of the VAT to the tax authorities.
Direktiivi 2006/112/EÜ artikli 193 kohaselt peab üldiselt maksuhaldurile käibemaksu tasuma kaubatarneid tegev või teenuseid osutav maksukohustuslane.
The purpose of the derogation requested by the Kingdom of the Netherlands is to make, under certain circumstances, the recipient of supplies of certain goods liable for the payment of VAT in relation to particular products, notably mobile phones, integrated circuit devices, game consoles and personal computers for mobile use.
Madalmaade Kuningriigi taotletava erandi eesmärk on teatavatel tingimustel muuta teatavate kaupade tarne saaja vastutavaks käibemaksu tasumise eest teatavate toodete, nimelt mobiiltelefonide ja integraallülitusseadmete ning kaasaskantavate mängukonsoolide ja personaalarvutite puhul.
According to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, a number of traders in those products engage in fraudulent activities by selling the products without paying the VAT to the tax authorities.
Madalmaade Kuningriigi andmetel on hulk kõnealuste toodetega kauplevaid äriühinguid seotud pettustega, müües kõnealuseid tooteid käibemaksu maksuhaldurile tasumata.
Their customers, however, are entitled to a deduction of VAT as they are in possession of a valid invoice.
Nende klientidel on aga kehtiva arve esitamise korral õigus käibemaks maha arvata.
In the most aggressive cases, the goods are supplied several times in a row without payment of VAT (‘carousel fraud’).
Kõige äärmuslikumal juhul tarnitakse kaupu mitu korda järjest ilma käibemaksu tasumata („karussellipettus”).
In this context, the Dutch tax investigation services have noted a shift from fraud with mobile phones and integrated circuit devices towards fraud with game consoles and personal computers for mobile use.
Sellega seoses on Madalmaade maksupettuste uurimise teenistus täheldanud pettuse kandumist mobiiltelefonidelt ja integraallülitusseadmetelt kaasaskantavatele mängukonsoolidele ja personaalarvutitele.
By designating the person to whom the goods are supplied as the person liable for the payment of VAT, a derogation from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC would eliminate the opportunity to engage in that form of tax evasion.
Määrates kauba saaja käibemaksu eest vastutavaks isikuks, kõrvaldaks direktiivi 2006/112/EÜ artiklist 193 tehtud erand võimaluse maksudest sellisel viisil kõrvale hoida.
In order to ensure the effective operation of the derogation and to prevent tax evasion from being shifted to retail trade or to other products, the Kingdom of the Netherlands should introduce appropriate control and reporting obligations.
Selleks et tagada erandi tõhus toimimine ja vältida maksudest kõrvalehoidmise nihkumist muude toodete või jaemüügi valdkonda, peaks Madalamaade Kuningriik kehtestama asjakohase kontrolli- ja aruandluskohustuse.
In addition, a minimum taxable amount threshold should reduce the risk of the fraud being shifted to retail trade.
Lisaks peaks maksustatava summa minimaalne piirväärtus vähendama pettuse jaemüüki kandumise ohtu.
The authorisation should be valid only for a very short period as questions remain concerning, in particular, the possible impact of the reverse charge mechanism on the functioning of the VAT systems within Member States who apply it or in other Member States.
Luba tuleks anda ainult väga lühikeseks asjakohaseks ajavahemikuks, kuna võimalik mõju seda kohaldavate liikmesriikide või ülejäänud liikmesriikide käibemaksusüsteemile ei ole veel teada.
The end date of the authorisation coincides with the end of similar derogations authorised in relation to mobile phones and integrated circuit devices so as to enable the development of a more comprehensive and more harmonised anti-fraud policy in the future.
Loa kehtivuse lõppkuupäev langeb kokku mobiiltelefonide ja integraallülitusseadmete suhtes lubatud samalaadsete erandite lõppkuupäevaga, et võimaldada laiapõhjalisema ja ühtlustatuma käibemaksupettuse vastase poliitika arengut tulevikus.
The derogation will not have an adverse effect on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT,
Erand ei mõju ebasoodsalt käibemaksust tulenevatele liidu omavahenditele,
By way of derogation from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Kingdom of the Netherlands is hereby authorised to designate as the person liable for the payment of VAT the taxable person to whom supplies of the following goods are made:
Erandina direktiivi 2006/112/EÜ artiklist 193 antakse Madalmaade Kuningriigile luba määrata käibemaksu tasumise eest vastutavaks isikuks maksukohustuslane, kellele tarnitakse järgmisi kaupu:
mobile phones, being devices made or adapted for use in connection with a licensed network and operated on specified frequencies, whether or not they have any other use;
mobiiltelefonid, mis on valmistatud või kohandatud töötamiseks litsentseeritud võrkudes ja töötavad kindlaksmääratud sagedustel sõltumata sellest, kas neil on või puudub mõni muu kasutusala;
integrated circuit devices such as microprocessors and central processing units in a state prior to integration into end-user products;
integraallülitusseadmed, näiteks mikroprotsessorid ja keskprotsessorid enne lõpptarbijale suunatud tootega liitmist;
game consoles, which by virtue of their objective characteristics and principal functions, are intended for playing video games and other computer games, whether or not they have any other use;
mängukonsoolid, mis vastavalt oma objektiivsetele omadustele ja põhifunktsioonidele on mõeldud video- ja muude arvutimängude mängimiseks, sõltumata sellest, kas neil on või puudub mõni muu kasutusala;
laptops and tablet PC’s.
süle- ja tahvelarvutid.
The derogation shall apply in respect of supplies of goods for which the taxable amount is equal to or higher than EUR 10000.
Erandit kohaldatakse kaubatarnete suhtes, mille maksustatav väärtus on vähemalt 10000 eurot.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 is subject to the Kingdom of the Netherlands introducing appropriate and effective control and reporting obligations on taxable persons who supply goods to which the reverse charge applies in accordance with this Decision.
Artiklis 1 sätestatud erandiga kehtestab Madalmaade Kuningriik maksukohustuslaste suhtes, kes tarnivad kaupu, millele rakendatakse käesoleva otsusega kehtestatud pöördmaksustamise korda, asjakohase ning tõhusa kontrolli- ja aruandluskohustuse.
This Decision shall expire either on 31 December 2013, or, if earlier, on the date of the entry into force of Union rules allowing all Member States to adopt such measures derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC.
Käesolev otsus kaotab kehtivuse kas 31. detsembril 2013 või kuupäeval, mil jõustub liidu eeskiri, millega lubatakse kõigil liikmesriikidel vastu võtta selliseid direktiivi 2006/112/EÜ artiklist 193 kõrvale kalduvaid meetmeid, olenevalt sellest, kumb kuupäev saabub esimesena.
Done at Brussels, 5 March 2013.
Brüssel, 5. märts 2013
appointing a Dutch member of the European Economic and Social Committee
Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomitee Madalmaade liikme ametisse nimetamise kohta
A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Leon MEIJER,
Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomitees on vabanenud liikmekoht seoses Leon MEIJERI volituste lõppemisega,
Ms Melanie BOUWKNEGT, Beleldsadviseur CNV Vakcentrale, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.
Melanie BOUWKNEGT, Beleldsadviseur CNV Vakcentrale, nimetatakse Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomitee liikmeks järelejäänud ametiajaks kuni 20. septembrini 2015.
An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Katja SORRI,
Regioonide Komitees on vabanenud üks asendusliikme koht seoses Katja SORRI volituste lõppemisega,
Ms Katri KULMUNI, Tornion kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen.
Katri KULMUNI, Tornion kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen.
of 7 March 2013
7. märts 2013,
on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for certain seats for children pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety
ohutusnõuete kohta, millele peavad Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu üldist tooteohutust käsitleva direktiivi 2001/95/EÜ kohaselt vastama teatavaid lapseistmeid käsitlevad Euroopa standardid
Products which conform to national standards that transpose European standards drawn up under Directive 2001/95/EC and referenced in the Official Journal of the European Union benefit from a presumption of safety.
Toodetelt, mis vastavad direktiivi 2001/95/EÜ alusel koostatud ja Euroopa Liidu Teatajas avaldatud Euroopa standardid üle võtnud riiklikele standarditele, eeldatakse ohutust.
European standards are to be drawn up on the basis of requirements intended to ensure that products which conform to them satisfy the general safety requirement set out in Article 3 of Directive 2001/95/EC.
Euroopa standardid tuleb koostada nende nõuete alusel, mille eesmärk on tagada, et neile vastavad tooted täidavad direktiivi 2001/95/EÜ artiklis 3 sätestatud üldist ohutusnõuet.
European standards EN 14988-1:2006 (Part 1: Safety requirements) and EN 14988-2:2006 (Part 2: Test methods) for children’s high chairs need to be revised.
Euroopa standardid EN 14988-1:2006 (osa 1: ohutusnõuded) ja EN 14988-2:2006 (osa 2: katsemeetodid) laste söögitoolide kohta tuleb üle vaadata.
In particular, more stringent safety requirements need to be introduced with regard to falling and entanglement hazards.
Eelkõige tuleb kehtestada rangemad ohutusnõuded seoses kukkumis- ja kinnijäämisohuga.
European standard EN 1272:1998 (Safety requirements and test methods) for table-mounted chairs is not referenced in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Euroopa standardit EN 1272:1998 (ohutusnõuded ja katsemeetodid) laua külge kinnitatavate toolide kohta ei ole Euroopa Liidu Teatajas avaldatud.