natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this respect, the Commission considers that it cannot be argued that this sum constituted (partial) compensation for the economic losses suffered by DSB in connection with the delays.
Seoses sellega leiab komisjon, et põhjendusena ei saa kasutada väidet, nagu oleks see summa (osaliselt) kompenseerinud DSB viivitustest tulenevat majanduslikku kahju.
The question of the harm suffered by DSB concerns the performance of the delivery contract between DSB and its supplier, which could be the subject of settlement procedures (out of court, by arbitration or by litigation).
DSB kahjudega seotud küsimus puudutab ju DSB ja tarnija vahel sõlmitud tarnelepingu täitmist, millega seoses võib rakendada vaidluste lahendamise menetlust (kokkuleppe alusel, lepitaja kaudu või kohtu teel).
The Commission notes that this issue has not been finally resolved, even though provisional compensation has been paid.
Komisjon märgib, et küsimust ei ole lõplikult lahendatud, ehkki ajutisi hüvitisi on juba makstud.
Second, the Commission notes that, in the context of the public transport service contract for 2005-14, the consequences of the delays were, on the contrary, taken into account in the calculation of the contractual payments.
Teiseks märgib komisjon seoses aastateks 2005–2014 sõlmitud avaliku teenindamise lepinguga, et selles on viivituste rahalisi tagajärgi lepingujärgsete maksete arvestamisel arvesse võetud.
The Danish authorities have demonstrated how the mechanism for adjusting the contractual payments operated in relation to the delays in delivery and according to the type of rolling stock concerned.
Taani asutused näitasid, kuidas rakendatakse lepingujärgsete maksete kohandamise mehhanismi vastavalt tarnimisel ilmnenud viivitustele ja asjakohasele veeremile.
The Commission notes that the contractual payments were reduced by DKK 645 million over the first 2 years of the contract.
Komisjon märgib, et lepingujärgseid makseid on lepingu kestuse kahel esimesel aastal vähendatud kokku 645 miljoni Taani krooni võrra.
It therefore considers that the late delivery of the rolling stock did not result in any overcompensation under that public transport service contract.
Komisjon leiab seega, et veeremi tarnimisel ilmnenud viivitused ei ole kõnealuse avaliku teenindamise lepingu raames kaasa toonud liigse hüvitise maksmist.
Third, the Commission notes that the replacement rented rolling stock was the subject of additional contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and DSB.
Kolmandaks nendib komisjon, et seoses renditud asendusveeremiga on Taani transpordiministeerium ja DSB sõlminud täiendavad lepingud.
It points out that DSB was not obliged, under the public transport service contracts, to use replacement rolling stock.
Komisjon tõstab esile, et avaliku teenindamise lepingute kohaselt ei pidanud DSB kasutama asendusveeremit.
The Commission notes that these additional contracts were concluded to deal with a new situation which had not been taken into account in the contracts, namely the consequences of the late delivery of the new trains.
Komisjon märgib, et täiendavad lepingud kajastasid uut olukorda, mida ei olnud algsetes lepingutes arvesse võetud, see tähendab uute rongide tarnimisel ilmnenud viivituste tagajärgi.
It therefore considers that the compensation paid to DSB covered new obligations of the rail operator and, consequently, was not liable to result in overcompensation under the public transport service contracts.
Komisjon leiab niisiis, et DSBle makstud hüvitised vastasid ettevõtte uutele kohustustele ega toonud seega kaasa avaliku teenindamise lepingute raames liigse hüvitise maksmist.
The Commission points out in this respect that if the settlement procedures (out of court, by arbitration or by litigation) between DSB and Ansaldobreda concerning the delays in delivery lead to the recognition of certain losses for DSB, if those losses concern the use of hired replacement rolling stock and if compensation is paid by Ansaldobreda to cover these, such compensation will have to be paid back to the Danish State because it bore the cost via the additional contracts.
Komisjon täpsustab seoses sellega, et kui DSB ja AnsaldoBreda vaheliste vaidluste lahendamise menetluste (kokkuleppe-, lepitus- või kohtumenetluse) tulemusel tunnistatakse, et DSB on saanud kahju, kui nimetatud kahju on seotud renditud asendusveeremi kasutamisega ning kui AnsaldoBreda peab selle hüvitama, siis tuleb need hüvitised üle anda Taani riigile, kuna too on kahjudega seotud kulud kandnud täiendavate lepingute alusel.
The Commission considers it necessary to impose a condition in this respect on the Danish State.
Komisjon peab vajalikuks Taani riigile sellesisulise kohustuse panemist.
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that DSB received overcompensation of DKK 104 million on account of the late delivery of the rolling stock provided for in the public transport service contracts.
Eespool nimetatut silmas pidades jõudis komisjon järeldusele, et DSB on saanud seoses avaliku teenindamise lepingutes ette nähtud veeremi tarnimisel ilmnenud viivitustega 104 miljoni Taani krooni ulatuses liigset hüvitist.
The Commission considers, however, that the effects of that overcompensation were avoided by the collection of dividends as described previously.
Komisjon on siiski seisukohal, et liigse hüvitise mõju aitas vältida eespool kirjeldatud dividendide väljamaksmine.
The additional dividends collected by the Danish State remain generally greater than all of the surplus profits plus the amount relating to the late delivery of rolling stock.
Taani riigile makstud dividendide üldsumma on nimelt suurem kui kasum, millele on lisatud veeremi tarnimisel ilmnenud viivitustega seotud hüvitiste summa.
The Commission therefore concludes that DSB did not receive any overcompensation in practice.
Komisjon nendib seega, et tegelikult ei ole DSB liigset hüvitist saanud.
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission expressed specific doubts regarding whether DSB could have received an advantage for operating this particular line.
Menetluse algatamise otsuses väljendas komisjon kahtlust selle suhtes, kas DSB on saanud eelise nimetatud liini teenindamiseks.
The Commission examined two aspects here.
Seoses sellega uuris komisjon kaht aspekti.
First, the Commission checked that, for the period 2000-04, DSB had not received any financial support in the form of aid under the public transport service contract even where the link was operated without a public service obligation.
Esiteks veendus komisjon, et ajavahemikul 2000–2004 ei saanud DSB avaliku teenindamise lepingust tulenevalt rahalist toetust ja liini teenindati väljaspool avaliku teenindamise raamistikku.
They have also indicated that that specific contract did not provide for any additional compensation for DSB from the Danish State for the operation of the line between 2002 and 2004.
Samuti osutasid Taani asutused, et kõnealuse lepingu kohaselt ei pidanud Taani riik ajavahemikul 2002–2004 DSBle kõnealuse liini teenindamise eest mingeid täiendavaid hüvitisi maksma.
The Danish authorities have therefore established that the rail line between Copenhagen and Ystad did not receive any public financing before 2005.
Taani asutused kinnitasid, et Kopenhaageni ja Ystadi vahelist liini ei ole enne 2005. aastat riigi vahenditest rahastatud.
The Commission notes that the inclusion of that line in the ‘public traffic’ scheme between 2002 and 2004 without additional compensation compared with the compensation paid under the public transport service contract with DSB for the period 2002-04 is not liable to result in overcompensation.
Komisjon märgib, et liini kaasamine „avaliku reisijateveo” režiimi aastatel 2002–2004, maksmata seejuures mingeid täiendavaid hüvitisi lisaks DSBga aastateks 2002–2004 sõlmitud avaliku teenindamise lepingu alusel makstavatele hüvitistele, ei toonud kaasa liigse hüvitise maksmist.
Its inclusion in the public transport traffic scheme had the result of expanding DSB’s obligations without increasing the contractual payments.
Liini kaasamine avaliku transpordi režiimi tõi ju DSBle kaasa täiendavaid kohustusi, kuid lepingujärgsed maksed ei suurenenud.
It also meant the inclusion of the revenues from that line in DSB’s overall revenues in respect of its public service activities.
Samuti tähendas see, et liiniga seotud tulu arvati DSB avaliku teenindamisega seotud kogutulu hulka.
The Commission notes, however, that the line was loss-making in 2002 and that it was precisely for that reason that it was included in the ‘public traffic’ scheme.
Komisjon võtab aga teadmiseks, et 2002. aastal oli liin kahjumis ning et just sel põhjusel kaasati see „ühistranspordi” režiimi.
That inclusion is consequently not liable to result in overcompensation.
Seega ei põhjustanud kaasamine liigse hüvitise maksmist.
In any event, the Commission considers that, if the line had been making a profit, the revenues specific to that line would have increased DSB’s total revenues in respect of its public service activities.
Igal juhul leiab komisjon, et kui liin olnuks majanduslikult tasuv, oleks sellelt teenitav tulu suurendanud DSB avaliku teenindamisega seotud tegevuse kogutulu.
Second, the Commission has examined DSB’s costs for the entire Copenhagen-Bornholm route and, in particular, how account was taken of the ferry crossing between Ystad and Rønne [53] in the combined tickets for its passengers.
Teiseks uuris komisjon DSB Kopenhaageni ja Bornholmi vahelise liiniga seotud kulusid ja ennekõike Ystadi ja Rønne [53] vahelise praamiühenduse arvestamist reisijatele müüdavate ühispiletite hinnas.
The Commission points out that the sea link between these two ports is operated by Bornholmtrafikken A/S, a public undertaking, on the basis of a contract concluded with the Danish State following a tendering procedure.
Komisjon tuletab meelde, et kahe nimetatud sadama vahelise mereühenduse tagab riigiettevõte Bornholmtrafikken A/S Taani riigiga hankekonkursi tulemusel sõlmitud lepingu alusel.
The Danish authorities have clarified the obligations of Bornholmtrafikken A/S under that contract, particularly in terms of coordination of departure and arrival times with bus or train operators.
Taani asutused täpsustasid ettevõtte Bornholmtrafikken A/S kõnealusest lepingust tulenevaid kohustusi, sealhulgas kohustust koordineerida sõidugraafikuid bussi- ja rongiettevõtetega.
They have also specified that no obligation was laid down in the area of pricing policy apart from the fixing of minimum fares.
Samuti täpsustasid Taani asutused, et hinnapoliitika valdkonnas ei ole seatud ühtki muud kohustust peale miinimumhindade määramise.
In the light of the information provided by the Danish authorities, the Commission notes that the prices charged by Bornholmtrafikken A/S are identical in relation to DSB and Gråhundbus.
Taani asutuste esitatud teavet silmas pidades märgib komisjon, et Bornholmtrafikken A/S rakendab DSB ja Gradhundbusi suhtes üht ja sama hinnakirja.
The only fare which applies to DSB alone is the special price for DSB Orange including the crossing of the Great Belt.
Ainus hind, mis kehtib üksnes DSB suhtes, on DSB Orange erihind, mis kehtib Suur-Belti väina ületamisel.
However, that fare is in line with specific commercial objectives of Bornholmtrafikken A/S in so far as the DSB Orange programme attracts travellers from Jutland to Bornholm.
Nimetatud hind vastab siiski ettevõtte Bornholmtrafikken A/S konkreetsetele kaubanduslikele eesmärkidele, kuna programm DSB Orange võimaldab Jüütimaalt Bornholmi reisijaid meelitada.
That particular fare is made available on specific conditions (it only applies on certain trains, Internet-based reservation system, limited number of tickets, etc.) and relates to different services from those offered by bus operators on that line.
Erihinnaga pileteid saab osta üksnes teatavatel tingimustel (kindlad rongid, veebipõhine broneerimissüsteem, piiratud piletite arv, jne) ning see on seotud samal liinil tegutsevate bussiettevõtjate teenustest erinevate teenustega.
The Commission notes that only a very small number of passengers took advantage of this offer and that it was withdrawn in 2009.
Komisjon märgib, et erihinnaga piletid on saanud väga väike hulk kliente ning et alates 2009. aastast seda enam ei pakuta.
The Commission therefore considers that the prices charged for this ferry trip by Bornholmtrafikken A/S did not confer an advantage on DSB compared with its competitors which offer a bus connection and also apply combined billing.
Seega on komisjon seisukohal, et hinnakiri, mida ettevõte Bornholmtrafikken A/S on kõnealusel praamiliinil rakendanud, ei ole andnud DSBle eelist bussiühendust ja samuti integreeritud hindu pakkuvate konkurentide ees.
The Commission is therefore of the opinion that the billing of the ferry connections did not result in overcompensation for DSB.
Komisjon on niisiis arvamusel, et praamiühenduse hinnad ei ole kaasa toonud DSBle liigse hüvitise maksmist.
On the whole, the Commission therefore considers that the public service compensation in question was calculated in accordance with the rules laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Kokkuvõttes on komisjon seisukohal, et kõnealuste avaliku teenindamise eest makstavate hüvitiste suurus on välja arvestatud kooskõlas määruse (EÜ) nr 1370/2007 lisas sätestatud eeskirjadega.
Consequently, the Commission concludes that the State aid contained in the contractual payments paid under the public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and DSB is compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 implementing Article 93 of the TFEU.
Seega järeldab komisjon, et Taani transpordiministeeriumi ja DSB vahel sõlmitud avaliku teenindamise lepingute raames tehtud lepingujärgsete maksetega antud riigiabi on siseturuga kokkusobiv, lähtudes määrusest (EÜ) nr 1370/2007, millega rakendatakse ELi toimimise lepingu artiklit 93.
EFFECT OF CERTAIN FISCAL MEASURES ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPENSATION
TEATAVATE MAKSUMEETMETE MÕJU AVALIKU TEENINDAMISE EEST MAKSTAVATE HÜVITISTE KOKKUSOBIVUSELE
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission noted that Danish private undertakings operating in VAT-exempt sectors such as the public transport sector are subject to a special payroll tax (‘lønskat’).
Menetluse algatamise otsuses nentis komisjon, et Taani eraettevõtete suhtes, kes tegutsevad käibemaksust vabastatud sektorites, nagu näiteks ühistranspordi sektor, kehtib töötasult maha arvatava tulumaksu erirežiim („lønsumsafgift”).
It was noted, however, that public undertakings such as DSB were not subject to the tax.
Komisjon märkis siiski, et riigiettevõtete, näiteks DSB suhtes see maks ei kehti.
Although DKT, the second complainant, claimed that DSB’s exemption from the payroll tax could give it a competitive advantage, the Commission did not examine the issue of payroll tax because it was the subject of a general examination by the Commission in the context of a separate procedure [54].
Kuigi teine kaebuse esitaja DKT viitas sellele, et DSB vabastamine töötasult maha arvatavast tulumaksust võis DSBle anda konkurentsieelise, ei uurinud komisjon tulumaksu küsimust, kuna seda hõlmas komisjoni eraldi menetluse raames läbi viidud üldine uurimine [54].
The complainant itself had cited a Parliamentary question and the answer given by Mrs Kroes on behalf of the Commission [55].
Kaebuse esitaja viitas ka ise parlamendi küsimusele ja komisjoni nimel esitatud proua Kroesi vastusele [55].
By letter of 9 June 2009, the Commission informed DKT that, after examining the measures in question, it had decided to close the procedure referred to above.
9. juuni 2009. aasta kirjas teatas komisjon DKTle, et pärast kõnealuste meetmete uurimist otsustas komisjon eespool nimetatud menetluse lõpetada.
The Commission stated that discussions and exchanges of information had taken place between the Commission and the Danish authorities in order to obtain clarification regarding the potential problems and ambiguities arising from the tax exemption from the perspective of the rules on State aid.
Komisjon osutas nimelt sellele, et komisjoni ja Taani asutuste vahel oli toimunud arutelu ja teabevahetus, mille eesmärgiks oli saada selgitusi võimalike probleemide kohta ja seoses maksuvabastusest tulenevate kaksipidimõistmistega riigiabi eeskirjade valdkonnas.
In this context, the Danish authorities agreed to amend their legislation.
Selles kontekstis nõustusid Taani asutused õigusakte muutma.
The Commission therefore notes that Denmark has adopted Act No 526 of 25 June 2008, which eliminates any potential distortion between public and private undertakings with regard to the implementation of the payroll tax.
Komisjon märgib niisiis, et Taani võttis vastu 25. juuni 2008. aasta seaduse nr 526, millega välistatakse riigi- ja eraettevõtete vahelise konkurentsi moonutamise võimalused seoses töötasult maha arvatava tulumaksuga.
It also points out that that Act entered into force on 1 January 2009 and that DSB has been subject to payroll tax since that date.
Komisjon märgib ka, et seadus jõustus 1. jaanuaril 2009 ning et pärast nimetatud kuupäeva kehtib töötasult maha arvatav tulumaks ka DSB suhtes.
For the purposes of this examination, the Commission points out that DSB’s exemption from that tax was included in the parameters used in determining the level of DSB’s contractual payments under the public transport service contracts, as indicated in recital 88 of this Decision.
Käesoleva uurimise seisukohast peab komisjon vajalikuks märkida, et DSB maksuvabastus kuulus parameetrite hulka, mille alusel määrati kindlaks DSBle avaliku teenindamise lepingute raames makstava hüvitise suurus, nagu on osutatud käesoleva otsuse põhjenduses 88.
The Commission notes that the tax exemption reduced DSB’s operating costs connected with the transport services provided for in the public transport service contracts.
Komisjon märgib, et maksuvabastus vähendas DSB avaliku teenindamise lepingute alusel osutatavate teenustega seotud tegevuskulu.
It therefore observes that, in the absence of an exemption, the Danish State would have to increase the amount of its contractual payments accordingly.
Seega nendib komisjon, et maksuvabastuse kaotamisel pidanuks Taani riik lepingujärgseid makseid vastavalt suurendama.
Consequently, the Commission considers that, even if DSB’s payroll tax exemption were to constitute State aid, that aid would have to be treated in the same way as ‘additional contractual payments’ of an amount equivalent to the tax burden from which the company was exempt.
Seega on komisjon seisukohal, et kui DSB tulumaksuvabastus on riigiabi, tuleks see samastada maksuvabastusele vastavate „täiendavate lepingujärgsete maksetega”.
In that event, the Commission observes that these ‘additional contractual payments’ would not result in overcompensation for DSB.
Sellisel juhul nendib komisjon, et nimetatud „täiendavad lepingujärgsed maksed” ei oleks kaasa toonud DSBle liigse hüvitise maksmist.
The Commission notes, moreover, that DSB has been subject to payroll tax as from 1 January 2009.
Lisaks märgib komisjon, et alates 1. jaanuarist 2009 kehtib töötasult maha arvatav tulumaks ka DSB suhtes.
DSB’s tax burden has increased as a result, which has an impact on its operating costs incurred in connection with the transport services provided for in the public transport service contracts.
Seoses sellega kasvab DSB maksukohustus, mis omakorda mõjutab avaliku teenindamise lepingute raames osutatavate teenustega seotud tegevuskulu.
The Danish authorities have indicated that the additional expenditure incurred by DSB will be compensated to take account of this change in the parameters used to calculate the contractual payments.
Taani asutused osutasid, et DSB täiendavad kulud hüvitatakse, et võtta arvesse lepingujärgsete maksete suuruse arvestamisel kasutatavate parameetrite sellist muutust.
In this respect, the Commission considers that the compensation of the additional tax costs resulting from the end of DSB’s tax exemption must be seen in conjunction with the overall economic aspects of the compensation system for public transport service contracts.
Seoses sellega on komisjon seisukohal, et DSB maksuvabastuse kaotamisest tulenevate täiendavate maksukulude hüvitamine sobib kokku avaliku teenindamise lepingute üldise hüvitiste süsteemiga.
The Commission has examined whether that compensation corresponded solely to the additional tax burden borne by DSB in respect of its public service activities.
Komisjon kontrollis, kas hüvitis vastas täpselt DSB avaliku teenindamisega seotud tegevuse valdkonnas lisandunud maksukoormusele.
Consequently, the Commission concludes that the compensation from the Danish State for the payroll tax that DSB has subsequently been required to pay does not result in overcompensation and should therefore be regarded as compatible with the internal market under Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Seega järeldab komisjon, et Taani riigi hüvitatud töötasult maha arvatav tulumaks, mille nüüd tasub DSB ise, ei too kaasa liigse hüvitise maksmist ning seda tuleb pidada määruse (EÜ) nr 1370/2007 kohaselt siseturuga kokkusobivaks.
The Commission takes the view that the public transport service contracts concluded between the Danish Ministry of Transport and DSB constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Komisjon on seisukohal, et Taani transpordiministeeriumi ja ettevõtte DSB vahel sõlmitud avaliku teenindamise lepingud on riigiabi Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 1 tähenduses.
The Commission concludes, however, that that aid is compatible with the internal market under Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, subject to Denmark’s introduction into the current public transport service contracts of the refund mechanism described in recitals 222 to 240 and 356 of this Decision.
Komisjon jõudis siiski järeldusele, et kõnealune riigiabi on määruse (EÜ) nr 1370/2007 kohaselt siseturuga kokkusobiv, tingimusel et Taani lisab kehtivatesse avaliku teenindamise lepingutesse käesoleva otsuse põhjendustes 222–240 ja 356 kirjeldatud tagastamismehhanismi.
In those circumstances, the aid in question is compatible until the expiry of the current public transport service contracts.
Sellisel juhul on kõnealune riigiabi kokkusobiv kuni kehtivate avaliku teenindamise lepingute lõppemiseni.
The assessment of the compatibility of the aid concerned in this Decision was carried out on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, which is applicable at the time when the Commission takes its decision.
Käesoleva otsuse objektiks olnud kokkusobivust hinnati määruse (EÜ) nr 1370/2007 alusel, mis on kohaldatav ajal, kui komisjon otsuse vastu võtab.
The Commission notes that the assessment rules in Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 correspond in terms of content to those in Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, as set out and interpreted by the Commission in its decision initiating the procedure.
Komisjon märgib, et määruses (EÜ) nr 1370/2007 ette nähtud hindamiseeskirjad on sisuliselt samasugused nagu määruses (EMÜ) nr 1191/69 sätestatud eeskirjad, mida komisjon esitas ja tõlgendas menetluse algatamise otsuses.
It observes that, in the present case, the application of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 would not have led to a different conclusion.
Komisjon nendib, et käesoleval juhul ei oleks määruse (EMÜ) nr 1191/69 kohaldamine kaasa toonud teistsuguseid järeldusi.
Finally, the aid concerned is compatible until the expiry of the current public transport service contracts.
Kõnealune riigiabi on kokkusobiv kuni kehtivate avaliku teenindamise lepingute lõppemiseni.
The contracts were concluded in 2004, that is to say as from 26 July 2000 and before 3 December 2009, on the basis of a procedure other than a fair competitive tendering procedure and for a term of 10 years.
Tegemist on lepingutega, mis on sõlmitud aastal 2004, see tähendab ajavahemikus 26. juulist 2000 kuni 3. detsembrini 2009, võistlevat pakkumismenetlust korraldamata ning mille kestus on 10 aastat.