natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This company is currently subject to a residual duty set at 50,7 % established during the original investigation on the basis of data pertaining to another Russian exporter, as BMK did not cooperate in that investigation.
Selle äriühingu suhtes kohaldatakse praegu jääktollimaksu määraga 50,7 %, mis kehtestati esialgse uurimise ajal ühe teise Venemaa eksportija kohta käivate andmete põhjal, sest BMK selles uurimises koostööd ei teinud.
However, the current dumping margin set at 36,2 % was calculated based on information relating to BMK for the whole RIP.
Ent praegune dumpingumarginaal 36,2 % arvutati kogu uurimisperioodi ulatuses BMK kohta käiva teabe põhjal.
In addition, there were no indications that the level of the normal value or the export price established for BMK in the current investigation is not reliable.
Lisaks puudusid viited selle kohta, et BMK kohta praeguses uurimises kindlaks tehtud normaalväärtuse või ekspordihinna tase ei ole usaldusväärne.
The export price of BMK to the Community during the RIP was found to be similar to that of its exports to other countries, where considerably higher quantities were sold during the RIP.
Leiti, et uurimisperioodil oli BMK ekspordihind, mida ta kohaldas ühenduses, sarnane tema ekspordiga teistesse riikidesse, kuhu uurimisperioodil müüdi märkimisväärselt suuremaid koguseid.
Although the dumping margin found in the RIP is based on a relatively low volume of exports of SWR to the Community, there are reasons to consider that the dumping margin found is based on changed circumstances of a lasting nature.
Kuigi uurimisperioodil leitud dumpingumarginaal põhineb ühendusse eksportimise puhul suhteliselt väikesel terastrosside ekspordi mahul, on põhjust arvata, et leitud dumpingumarginaal põhineb püsivalt muutunud asjaoludel.
It is important to recall that SSM's export prices to the Community are subject to a price undertaking which became applicable to exports to the new 10 Member States (EU-10) which joined the EU at the beginning of the last two months of Russia-interim review period, namely in May 2004.
Oluline on meenutada, et SSMi ühendusse suunatud ekspordi hindade suhtes kehtib hinnakohustus, mis hakkas kehtima Venemaa vahepealse läbivaatamise perioodi viimase kahe kuu alguses ELiga liitunud 10 uude liikmesriiki (EL-10) suunatud ekspordi suhtes 2004. aaasta mais.
Although the export prices charged to customers located in the 15 Member States comprising the EU before 1 May 2004 were at the level required by the undertaking, the sales to EU-10 customers were found to be made at a lower price level.
Kuigi enne 1. maid 2004 ELi 15 liikmesriigi suhtes kehtestatud ekspordihinnad olid kohustuses nõutud tasemel, leiti, et müük EL-10 klientidele toimus madalamal hinnatasemel.
Furthermore, it was also found that exports to other third countries in Russia-interim review period were made at significantly lower prices and in significantly bigger quantities than those exported to the Community.
Lisaks leiti, et Venemaa vahepealse läbivaatamise perioodi eksport kolmandatesse riikidesse toimus oluliselt madalama hinnaga ja oluliselt suuremates kogustes kui eksport ühendusse.
SSM's low quantity of exports of SWR to the Community during Russia-interim review period cannot be attributed to capacity constraints as it was found that the company had significant spare production capacity available.
SSMi ühendusse suunatud terastrosside ekspordi väike kogus ühendusse Venemaa vahepealse läbivaatamise perioodi ajal ei saa olla tingitud tootmisvõimsuse vähesusest, sest leiti, et ettevõttel on märkimisväärne hulk kasutamata tootmisvõimsust.
It seems therefore clear that the low quantity of exports is the result of the prices imposed by the price undertakings.
Seetõttu näib selge, et väike ekspordikogus tuleneb hinnakohustuse tõttu kehtestatud hindadest.
This suggests that if the price undertaking ceased to exist, it is very likely that SSM would sell larger quantities at lower (and thus dumped) prices on the Community market.
Sellest nähtub, et kui hinnakohustus kaoks, müüks SSM ühenduse turul suuremaid koguseid madalamate hindadega (seega dumpinguhindadega).
As indicated above, all exports — both to the Community and to third countries — were taken into account in this analysis.
Nagu eespool viidatud, võeti selles analüüsis arvesse kogu eksporti – nii ühendusse kui ka kolmandatesse riikidesse.
The investigation showed that SSM has the spare capacity to significantly increase its exports both to the Community and to third countries.
Uurimine näitas, et SSMil on kasutamata tootmisvõimsust, mis võimaldab tal oluliselt suurendada oma eksporti ühendusse ja kolmandatesse riikidesse.
If, as is likely, SSM would try to recover the market share it held on the Community market prior to the imposition of measures, it could do so by selling at dumped prices on the Community market.
Kui SSM püüaks taastada meetmete kehtestamise eelset turuosa ühenduse turul, mis on tõenäoline, võiks ta seda teha dumpinguhinnaga müügi abil ühenduse turul.
In addition to this, prices to other countries were on average lower than prices to the Community market and the investigation concluded that the product concerned was sold at dumped prices to non-EU countries.
Peale selle olid hinnad teistesse riikidesse müügil keskmiselt madalamad kui hinnad ühenduse turule müümisel ning uurimisel järeldati, et vaatlusalust toodet müüdi ELi mittekuuluvatele riikidele dumpinguhinnaga.
SSM's normal value in the RIP was based on a large volume (the vast majority of its production) sold in the ordinary course of trade on a competitive domestic market.
SSMi normaalväärtus uurimisperioodil põhines suurel kogusel (valdav osa tema toodangust), mis müüdi tavapärase kaubandustegevuse käigus konkurentsiga omamaisel turul.
This indicates that the level of normal value found in the current investigation is of a lasting nature.
See viitab, et käesolevas uurimises leitud normaalväärtuse tase on püsiv.
Consequently, it is considered that, in the absence of anti-dumping measures, SSM export volumes to the Community would increase sharply and that export prices would fall significantly.
Järelikult leitakse, et dumpinguvastaste meetmete puudumisel suureneks SSMi ühendusse suunatud ekspordi maht järsult ja ekspordihinnad langeksid oluliselt.
Therefore, it is concluded that the alleged changed circumstances with regard to SSM export prices cannot reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Seega järeldatakse, et väidetavaid muutunud asjaolusid seoses SSMi ekspordihindadega ei saa põhjendatult pidada püsivateks.
The interim review investigation showed that the exports to the Community made by the cooperating Thai exporter were not made at dumped prices.
Vahepealse läbivaatamise uurimine näitas, et koostööd teinud Tai eksportija eksport ühendusse ei toimunud dumpinguhinnaga.
It was also found that the export prices charged by the Thai exporter to the Community were similar to prices charged to parties located in other third countries, where larger quantities were sold.
Samuti leiti, et ekspordihinnad, mida Tai eksportija kohaldas ühenduses, olid sarnased kolmandates riikides, kuhu müüdi suuremaid koguseid, asuvate isikute suhtes kehtestatud hindadega.
In addition, it was found that the Thai exporter developed its distribution network and delivered SWR to a wider range of customers in the rest of the world.
Lisaks leiti, et Tai eksportija arendas oma turustusvõrku ja tarnis terastrosse suuremale hulgale klientidele mujal maailmas.
Sales subsidiaries were established in Australia, Singapore and the United States.
Müügiotstarbelised tütarettevõtted on asutatud Austraalias, Singapuris ja Ameerika Ühendriikides.
Usha's low quantity of exports of SWR to the Community cannot therefore be attributed to capacity constraints as the company has virtually no spare capacity.
Usha ühendusse suunatud väike terastrosside ekspordi kogus ei saa seega olla tingitud tootmisvõimsuse piirangutest, sest äriühingul peaaegu ei olegi kasutamata tootmisvõimsust.
It is considered that, in the absence of anti-dumping measures (i.e. currently a price undertaking), Usha's export volumes to the Community would not increase significantly and its export prices would hardly be affected.
Leitakse, et dumpinguvastaste meetmete (praegu hinnakohustus) puudumisel ei suureneks Usha ekspordimaht ühendusse oluliselt ja tema ekspordihindu see ilmselt ei mõjutaks.
Based on the above facts and considerations it can be concluded that, in the absence of significant spare capacity and taking into account that the company mainly focuses its exports on several other export markets than the Community where export prices are considerably higher than on the Community market, the changed circumstances found with regard to Usha can be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Lähtudes eespool toodud asjaoludest ja kaalutlustest, võib järeldada, et märkimisväärse kasutamata tootmisvõimsuse puudumisel ja arvestades, et äriühingu eksport keskendub peale ühenduse põhiosas mitmetele teistele eksporditurgudele, kus ekspordihinnad on oluliselt kõrgemad kui ühenduse turul, võib Usha puhul tuvastatud muutunud asjaolusid pidada püsivateks.
Turkey (Has Celik)
Türgi (Has Celik)
Imports to the Community of SWR originating in Turkey have increased significantly since the year 2005.
Türgist pärit terastrosside import ühendusse on alates 2005. aastast oluliselt suurenenud.
At that time, an interim review concluded that, in the absence of dumping, it was appropriate to repeal the measures insofar as they concern the applicant Turkish exporter.
Sellel ajal järeldati vahepealsel läbivaatamisel, et dumpingu puudumise tõttu oli asjakohane lõpetada seni kehtinud meetmed taotluse esitanud Türgi eksportija puhul.
The current interim review for the same producer has confirmed that its exports to the Community were made at prices which were not found to be dumped.
Praegune vahepealne läbivaatamine sama tootja kohta kinnitas, et tema eksport ühendusse ei toimunud dumpinguhinnaga.
In addition, the production capacity of that company was found to be limited compared to Community consumption.
Lisaks leiti, et selle äriühingu tootmisvõimsus on ühenduse tarbimisega võrreldes piiratud.
As a consequence, it can be concluded that the change of circumstances as established in the interim review is of a lasting nature.
Seetõttu võib järeldada, et vahepealsel läbivaatamisel kindlaks tehtud muutunud asjaolud on püsivad.
The cooperating producers in this investigation represent almost the totality of imports into the EU from the countries concerned.
Käesolevas uurimises koostööd teinud tootjad esindavad peaaegu kogu asjaomaste riikide importi ELi.
The examination of whether it would be likely that dumping would continue should measures be repealed was therefore based, to a large extent, on the information provided by these cooperating exporting producers.
Uurimine, kas on tõenäoline, et dumping jätkub, kui meetmed tunnistatakse kehtetuks, põhines seega suures ulatuses nimetatud koostööd tegevate tootjate esitatud andmetel.
In particular, the pricing behaviour of the cooperating exporting producers to other export markets and their production, production capacity and stocks were examined.
Eeskätt uuriti koostööd tegevate eksportivate tootjate hinnakäitumist teiste turgude suhtes, nende tootmist, tootmisvõimsust ja varusid.
In order to determine whether there was a likelihood of continuation of dumping, the Commission looked at the current situation of the countries concerned and the parties concerned by the investigation.
Dumpingu jätkumise tõenäosuse kindlakstegemiseks uuris komisjon praegust olukorda asjaomastes riikides ja uurimisega seotud isikute puhul.
Where relevant, it also looked at the possible existence of dumping on exports to the Community.
Vajaduse korral uuris ta ka võimalikku dumpingu olemasolu ühendusse eksportimisel.
An analysis was also made as to the pricing behaviour, production and production capacity of other exporting producers in the countries concerned by the investigations.
Lisaks analüüsiti veel uurimises vaadeldud riikide muude eksportivate tootjate hinnakäitumist, tootmist ja tootmisvõimsust.
This analysis was based on market intelligence data supplied by the Community industry and exporting producers, Eurostat imports statistics and, when available, export statistics from the countries concerned.
See analüüs põhines ühenduse tootmisharu ja eksportivate tootjate edastatud turu-uuringute andmetel, Eurostati impordistatistikal ning võimaluse korral asjaomaste riikide ekspordistatistikal.
Production, production capacity and investments
Tootmine, tootmisvõimsus ja investeerimine
SSM managed to increase production in the expiry review investigation period by 7 % compared to 2005.
SSMil õnnestus aegumise läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil võrreldes 2005. aastaga suurendada oma tootmist 7 %.
While the production capacity remained stable during the period considered, the average capacity utilisation in the Russia was found to be around 60 to 65 % for the review investigation period.
Vaatlusalusel perioodil jäi tootmisvõimsus küll stabiilseks, kuid tuvastatud keskmine tootmisvõimsuse rakendusaste Venemaal oli läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil ligikaudu 60–65 %.
It therefore can be concluded that the exporting producers in the Russia have the capacity to increase their exports to the Community market should measures be repealed.
Seega saab järeldada, et Venemaa eksportivatel tootjatel on võimsust suurendada oma eksporti ühenduse turule, kui meetmed kehtetuks tunnistatakse.
Moreover, the overall capacity of the Russia concerning the product concerned is estimated to be approximately at the level of total EU consumption during the ERIP, namely 220000 tonnes.
Lisaks on Venemaa üldine vaatlusalust toodet puudutav tootmisvõimsus hinnanguliselt samal tasemel ELi kogutarbimisega aegumise läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil ehk 220000 tonni.
Since Russian market is not able to handle this level of supply, Russian producers may choose to redirect this spare capacity to the Community at dumped prices if measures are repealed.
Kuna Venemaa turg ei suuda sellise tarnete tasemega toime tulla, võivad Venemaa tootjad otsustada suunata selle kasutamata tootmisvõimsuse ühendusse dumpinguhindadega, kui meetmed kehtetuks tunnistatakse.
Relationship between export prices, third countries and the price level in the Community
Kolmandatesse riikidesse suunatud ekspordi hindade ja ühenduse hinnataseme seos
In recitals 61 and 62, it was explained that because of the existence of a price undertaking the exports made to the Community were not made at dumped levels.
Põhjendustes 61 ja 62 on selgitatud, et eksport ühendusse ei toimunud dumpinguhindadega tänu hinnakohustuse olemasolule.
It was also demonstrated that the MIP's established with the price undertaking influenced the pricing of the Russian company concerned in the Community market.
Samuti on näidatud, et hinnakohustusega kehtestatud minimaalsed impordihinnad mõjutasid Venemaa asjaomase äriühingu hinnakujundust ühenduse turul.
It was therefore concluded that the export price to the Community was not reliable within the meaning of Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Seetõttu jõuti järeldusele, et ekspordihind ühendusse ei ole algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 8 tähenduses usaldusväärne.
Prices to third countries were therefore considered to be more reliable as they were not subject to any constraints during the ERIP.
Kolmandate riikide suhtes kehtestatud hindu peeti seega usaldusväärsemaks, kuna nende suhtes ei kehtinud aegumise läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil mingeid piiranguid.
Also during the ERIP, Russian export prices to third countries were generally lower than the price level in the Community.
Samuti olid aegumise läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil Venemaa ekspordihinnad kolmandate riikide puhul üldiselt ühenduse hindadest madalamad.
Therefore, if measures were repealed, Russian exporters are likely to export SWR in large quantities to the Community and at lower prices than under the current price undertaking.
Seetõttu hakkavad Venemaa eksportijad meetmete kehtetuks tunnistamise korral tõenäoliselt terastrosse suurtes kogustes ühendusse eksportima ning hindadega, mis oleks madalamad, kui nõuab praegune hinnakohustus.
As a consequence, it appears likely that dumping would recur should the anti-dumping measures in force be repealed.
Seega näib, et kehtivate dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtetuks tunnistamise korral dumping tõenäoliselt korduks.
This is particularly relevant in view of the current situation concerning the price undertaking.
See on eriti oluline, arvestades praegust hinnakohustust.
Conclusion on Russia
Kokkuvõte Venemaa kohta
The behaviour of Russian exporters and the influence of the price undertaking on the level of the export price to the Community, the prevailing lower level of prices in third countries and the large spare production capacities available are clear indications that Russian producers would be likely to revert to the Community market in significant quantities at dumped prices in the case where measures are repealed.
Venemaa eksportijate käitumine ja hinnakohustuse mõju ühenduse suhtes kehtestatud ekspordihinnale, kolmandate riikide suhtes kehtestatud valdavalt madalam hinnatase ja suur kasutamata tootmisvõimsus on selged viited, et meetmete kehtetuks tunnistamise korral tuleksid Venemaa tootjad ühenduse turule tagasi märkimisväärsete dumpinguhinnaga kogustega.
The Thai cooperating producer is the dominant producer in Thailand representing a major share, namely around 80 %, of installed production capacity and actual production of SWR in Thailand.
Tai koostööd tegev tootja on Tai põhiline tootja, kes esindab suurt osa ehk umbes 80 % Tais paigaldatud tootmisvõimsusest ja tegelikust terastrosside tootmisest.
The investigation showed that this producer produced at full capacity and that the other two known Thai producers are almost completely absent from the Community market and that they did not have large production capacities available.
Uurimine näitas, et see tootja tootis täisvõimsusel ning ülejäänud kaks teadaolevat Tai tootjat ei olnud ühenduse turul peaaegu üldse esindatud ning neil ei olnud suuri kasutamata tootmisvõimsusi.
The investigation showed that even if the cooperating exporting producer was selling at dumped prices at the Community market, its sales volumes were extremely low.
Uurimine näitas, et isegi kui koostööd tegev eksportiv tootja oleks müünud ühenduse turul dumpinguhinnaga, olid tema müügimahud äärmiselt väikesed.
It was observed on the basis of the company's worldwide exports that the company focuses on several other export markets than the Community, most notably the United States, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, Japan and Malaysia.
Äriühingu ülemaailmse ekspordi põhjal täheldati, et ta keskendub peale ühenduse mitmele teisele eksporditurule, eelkõige Ameerika Ühendriikidele, Singapurile, Indoneesiale, Austraaliale, Jaapanile ja Malaisiale.
Sales subsidiaries were even established in these countries.
Neis riikides on asutatud isegi müügiotstarbelised tütarettevõtted.
Relationship between export prices and the price undertaking
Ekspordihindade ja hinnakohustuse seos
The cooperating exporting producer respected the price undertaking and, given the currently high market prices, it sold at prices above the agreed minimum prices on many occasions.
Koostööd tegev eksportiv tootja täitis hinnakohustust ning arvestades praeguseid kõrgeid turuhindu, müüs mitmel puhul kokkulepitud miinimumhinnast kõrgema hinnaga.
There are no other Thai companies exporting the product concerned to the Community market.
Ükski teine Tai äriühing vaatlusalust toodet ühenduse turule ei ekspordi.
Relationship between export prices to third countries and the price level in the Community
Kolmandatesse riikidesse suunatud ekspordi hindade ja ühenduse hinnataseme seos
During the ERIP, sales volume of Usha to the rest of the world was significantly higher than sales to the Community, notwithstanding the fact that the export price level in the Community was on average 9,5 % higher than in the rest of the world.
Aegumise läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil oli Usha müügimaht ülejäänud maailmas oluliselt suurem kui müük ühendusse, vaatamata asjaolule, et ekspordi hinnatase ühenduses oli keskmiselt 9,5 % kõrgem kui mujal maailmas.
Based on the above facts and considerations, it is unlikely that the cooperating exporting producer in Thailand will export large quantities to the Community market, even if measures were repealed.
Ülal esitatud faktide ja kaalutluste põhjal ei ole tõenäoline, et koostööd tegev Tai eksportiv tootja hakkab eksportima suuri koguseid ühenduse turule, isegi kui meetmed kehtetuks tunnistatakse.
The other two Thai producers do not seem to have an international distribution network in place that would allow them to enter the Community market aggressively and gain market share.
Kahel ülejäänud Tai tootjal ei näi olevat sellist rahvusvahelist turustusvõrku, mis võimaldaks neil agressiivselt ühenduse turule siseneda ja seal turuosa võita.
According to the information gathered during the investigation, the production capacity remained unchanged during the period under investigation and capacity utilisation has increased.
Uurimise käigus kogutud teabe kohaselt tootmisvõimsus uuritud perioodil ei muutunud ja tootmisvõimsuse rakendamine on kasvanud.
As a consequence, it was found that both Turkish companies reach about 90 % of their production capacity.
Seega leiti, et mõlemad Türgi äriühingud kasutavad umbes 90 % oma tootmisvõimsusest.
There are no other companies producing the PC in Turkey.
Muid vaatlusalust toodet tootvaid äriühinguid Türgis ei ole.
Moreover, it was observed that the share of dumped imports from Turkey (from Celik Halat) on the Community market is less than 0,5 % of which 10 % were not even in competition with Community production, because it concerned product types which were not produced by the Community industry.
Lisaks täheldati, et Türgist (Celik Halatilt) pärit dumpinguhinnaga impordi osatähtsus ühenduse turul on alla 0,5 %, millest 10 % isegi ei konkureerinud ühenduse toodanguga, sest tegemist oli tooteliikidega, mida ühenduse tootmisharu ei tooda.
Since Has was found not to be dumping, the market share of dumped imports from Turkey is thus very low.
Kuna leiti, et Has dumpingut ei kasuta, oli Türgist dumpinguhindadega impordi turuosa väga väike.
Therefore, only a small share of exports from Turkey is dumped and in direct competition with the Community industry.
Seega on ainult väike osa Türgist pärit impordist dumpinguhindadega ning konkureerib otseselt ühenduse tootmisharuga.
Considering the above arguments, it is unlikely that the cooperating exporting producers would export large quantities to the Community market, even if measures were repealed.
Ülal esitatud väiteid arvestades ei ole tõenäoline, et koostööd tegevad eksportivad tootjad hakkavad eksportima suuri koguseid ühenduse turule, isegi kui meetmed kehtetuks tunnistatakse.
On this basis, there is no likelihood of recurrence or continuation of dumping.
Selle põhjal ei ole dumpingu kordumine või jätkumine tõenäoline.
SWR are manufactured by 29 Community producers in the Community and production was found to amount to around 202000 tonnes during the ERIP.
Terastrosse toodab ühenduses 29 tootjat ning aegumise läbivaatamise uurimisperioodil oli nende toodang ligikaudu 202000 tonni.
As in the original investigation, some of the Community producers were found to import the product concerned.
Nagu esialgse uurimise ajal, nii leiti ka nüüd, et mõned ühenduse tootjad impordivad vaatlusalust toodet.
However, the quantities imported were negligible in comparison with their production (less than 1 % of their production volume) and there were no imported products originating in the countries concerned.
Samas olid imporditavad kogused tühised võrreldes nende tootmisega (alla 1 % nende tootmismahust) ning ükski imporditud toode ei pärinenud asjaomastest riikidest.
It was therefore concluded that there were no grounds for excluding any of these producers from the definition of Community production.
Seetõttu järeldati, et ei ole alust jätta ühtegi neist tootjatest välja ühenduse toodangu määratlusest.