natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 17 September 2008, Greece submitted to the Commission an application to revise its annual BSE monitoring programme.
septembril 2008. aastal esitas Kreeka komisjonile taotluse oma iga-aastase BSE seireprogrammi läbivaatamise kohta.
On 18 September 2008, applications submitted by those 15 Member States were assessed by an ad-hoc working group of experts which concluded that the risk analyses provided by the Member States in support of their applications were suitable and would ensure the protection of human and animal health.
septembril 2008 hindas nende 15 liikmesriigi esitatud taotlusi ajutine ekspertide töörühm, kes tegi järelduse, et liikmesriikide taotluste kinnituseks esitatud riskianalüüsid on asjakohased ning et taotluste rahuldamise korral oleks inimeste ja loomade tervise kaitse tagatud.
All the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 6(1b) and all the epidemiological criteria set out in point 7 of Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 that Member States have to comply with for demonstrating the improvement of their epidemiological situation were also checked and found to be met.
Kontrolliti ka kõiki määruse (EÜ) nr 999/2001 artikli 6 lõike 1b kolmandas lõigus sätestatud nõudeid ja III lisa A peatüki I osa punktis 7 sätestatud epidemioloogilisi kriteeriume, mida liikmesriigid peavad oma epidemioloogilise olukorra parandamiseks täitma, ning leiti, et need on täidetud.
It is therefore appropriate to authorise the 15 Member States whose applications have been favourably evaluated to revise their annual monitoring programme and to retain 48 months as the new age limit for BSE testing in those Member States.
Seega on asjakohane lubada neil 15 liikmesriigil, kelle taotlused hindamisel heaks kiideti, oma iga-aastased seireprogrammid läbi vaadata ja kehtestada neis liikmesriikides nende loomade uueks vanusepiiriks, keda BSE suhtes kontrollitakse, 48 kuud.
Some Member States who joined the Community from 1 May 2004 but started the compliance effort during their pre-accession years also submitted to the Commission applications to revise their annual BSE monitoring programmes.
Mõned liikmesriigid, kes ühinesid Euroopa Liiduga 1. mail 2004, kuid alustasid oma eeskirjade ühenduse eeskirjadega vastavusse viimist ühinemiseelsetel aastatel, esitasid samuti komisjonile taotluse oma iga-aastaste seireprogrammide läbivaatamise kohta.
In addition to the scientific assessment and in order to verify compliance with the epidemiological criteria, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) is expected to carry out an inspection in these Member States and also in those who will apply for a review of their programme.
Lisaks teadusliku hinnangu esitamisele ja selleks, et kontrollida epidemioloogilistele kriteeriumidele vastavust, peaks Toidu- ja Veterinaaramet läbi viima kontrollkäigud nii taotluse esitanud liikmesriikides kui ka neis liikmesriikides, kes alles esitavad taotluse oma programmide läbivaatamiseks.
The Commission has received review requests from Slovenia and Cyprus.
Komisjon on saanud läbivaatamise taotlused Sloveenialt ja Küproselt.
For practical reasons, it is appropriate that the commencement date of the revised annual monitoring programmes coincides with the Community budgetary year.
Praktilistel põhjustel on asjakohane, et läbivaadatud iga-aastaste seireprogrammide alguskuupäev langeks kokku ühenduse eelarveaasta alguskuupäevaga.
From 1 January 2009, the Member States listed in the Annex hereto may revise their annual monitoring programme as provided for in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 (the revised annual monitoring programmes).
Käesoleva otsuse lisas loetletud liikmesriigid võivad oma määruse (EÜ) nr 999/2001 artikli 6 lõike 1 kohased iga-aastased seireprogrammid alguskuupäevaga 1. jaanuar 2009 läbi vaadata (läbivaadatud iga-aastased seireprogrammid).
The revised annual monitoring programmes shall apply only to the national bovine population of the concerned Member State and shall cover at least all bovine animals above 48 months of age belonging to the following subpopulations:
Läbivaadatud iga-aastaseid seireprogramme kohaldatakse ainult asjaomase liikmesriigi veisepopulatsiooni suhtes ja need hõlmavad kõiki kuni 48 kuu vanuseid veiseid, kes kuuluvad järgmistesse alampopulatsioonidesse:
animals as referred to in point 2.2 of Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001;
määruse (EÜ) nr 999/2001 III lisa A peatüki I osa punktis 2.2 osutatud loomad;
animals as referred to in point 2.1 of Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001;
määruse (EÜ) nr 999/2001 III lisa A peatüki I osa punktis 2.1 osutatud loomad;
animals as referred to in point 3.1 of Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
määruse (EÜ) nr 999/2001 III lisa A peatüki I osa punktis 3.1 osutatud loomad.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Käesolev otsus on adresseeritud Belgia Kuningriigile, Taani Kuningriigile, Saksamaa Liitvabariigile, Iirimaale, Kreeka Vabariigile, Hispaania Kuningriigile, Prantsuse Vabariigile, Iirimaale, Itaalia Vabariigile, Luksemburgi Suurhertsogiriigile, Madalmaade Kuningriigile, Austria Vabariigile, Portugali Vabariigile, Soome Vabariigile, Rootsi Kuningriigile ning Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigile.
List of Member States
Liikmesriikide loetelu
amending Parts 1 and 2 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications)
millega muudetakse Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu 1. ja 2. osa (tehnilised näitajad)
Having regard to the initiative by the Republic of Slovenia,
võttes arvesse Sloveenia Vabariigi algatust,
The Vision network has been established to allow consultation between the central authorities of the partner States for visa applications made by nationals from sensitive countries.
Visioni võrgustik loodi selleks, et võimaldada konsulteerimist partnerriikide keskasutuste vahel seoses viisataotlustega, mille on esitanud tundlike riikide kodanikud.
In order to achieve a pragmatic approach and to avoid overburdening the Schengen consultation network by sending a high number of error messages when a Member State’s message transfer agent (MTA) seems to be temporarily unavailable, the resend procedure should be modified.
Taassaatmise menetlust tuleks muuta, et saavutada pragmaatiline lähenemisviis ja vältida Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu ülekoormamist suure hulga veateadete saatmise tõttu, kui liikmesriigi teisaldusagent (MTA) ajutiselt ei tööta.
In order to avoid inconsistent use of different visa type codes which could lead to misinterpretations in the Schengen consultation procedure, a common approach is needed when visas D + C are subject to the consultation procedure.
Et vältida erinevate viisaliikide koodide ebajärjekindlat kasutamist, mis võib tuua kaasa väärtõlgendusi Schengeni konsultatsioonimenetluses, on vaja ühist lähenemisviisi, kui D + C viisade puhul on ette nähtud konsultatsioonimenetlus.
Taking into account the inputs from different Member States and in order to simplify the Schengen consultation procedure, a single code for each visa type should be used.
Arvestades erinevate liikmesriikide panust ja selleks, et lihtsustada Schengeni konsultatsioonimenetlust, tuleks iga viisaliigi puhul kasutada ühte koodi.
It is necessary to update the technical specifications of the Schengen consultation network to ensure that they reflect these changes.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu tehnilisi näitajaid on vaja ajakohastada tagamaks, et nad kajastavad kõnealuseid muudatusi.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is to decide, in accordance with Article 5 of the said Protocol, within a period of six months after the adoption of this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Arvestades, et käesolev otsus põhineb Schengeni acquis’l vastavalt Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu kolmanda osa IV jaotise sätetele, peab Taani vastavalt nimetatud protokolli artiklile 5 otsustama kuue kuu jooksul pärast käesoleva otsuse vastuvõtmist, kas ta rakendab seda oma siseriiklikus õiguses.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [2], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [3] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.
Islandi ja Norra puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu ning Islandi Vabariigi ja Norra Kuningriigi vahel sõlmitud lepingu (viimase kahe riigi osalemiseks Schengeni acquis’ sätete rakendamises, kohaldamises ja edasiarendamises) [2] tähenduses, mis kuuluvad nimetatud lepingu teatavaid rakenduseeskirju käsitleva nõukogu otsuse 1999/437/EÜ [3] artikli 1 punktis A osutatud valdkonda.
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the association of the Swiss Confederation with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [4], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [5] on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of that Agreement.
Šveitsi puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist Euroopa Liidu, Euroopa Ühenduse ning Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni vahelise lepingu (Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni ühinemise kohta Schengeni acquis’ rakendamise, kohaldamise ja edasiarendamisega) [4] tähenduses, mis kuuluvad nõukogu otsuse 1999/437/EÜ artikli 1 punktis A osutatud valdkonda, kusjuures nimetatud otsuse vastavat punkti tõlgendatakse koostoimes nõukogu otsuse 2008/146/EÜ [5] (nimetatud lepingu Euroopa Ühenduse nimel sõlmimise kohta) artikliga 3.
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/261/EC [6] on the signature, on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Protocol.
Liechtensteini puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist Euroopa Liidu, Euroopa Ühenduse, Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni ja Liechtensteini Vürstiriigi vahel alla kirjutatud protokolli (mis käsitleb Liechtensteini Vürstiriigi ühinemist Euroopa Liidu, Euroopa Ühenduse ja Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni vahelise lepinguga Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni ühinemise kohta Schengeni acquis’ rakendamise, kohaldamise ja edasiarendamisega) tähenduses, mis kuuluvad otsuse 1999/437/EÜ artikli 1 punktis A osutatud valdkonda, kusjuures nimetatud otsuse vastavat punkti tõlgendatakse koostoimes nõukogu otsuse 2008/261/EÜ [6] (nimetatud protokolli Euroopa Ühenduse nimel allakirjutamise ja selle teatavate sätete ajutise kohaldamise kohta) artikliga 3.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [7]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Käesolev otsus kujutab endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist, milles Ühendkuningriik ei osale vastavalt nõukogu 29. mai 2000. aasta otsusele 2000/365/EÜ (Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigi taotluse kohta osaleda teatavates Schengeni acquis’ sätetes). [7] Seetõttu ei osale Ühendkuningriik otsuse vastuvõtmisel, see ei ole tema suhtes siduv ega kohaldatav.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [8]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Käesolev otsus kujutab endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist, milles Iirimaa ei osale vastavalt nõukogu 28. veebruari 2002. aasta otsusele 2002/192/EÜ (Iirimaa taotluse kohta osaleda teatavates Schengeni acquis’ sätetes). [8] Seetõttu ei osale Iirimaa otsuse vastuvõtmisel, see ei ole tema suhtes siduv ega kohaldatav.
As regards Cyprus, this Decision constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Küprose puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast õigusakti, mis põhineb Schengeni acquis’l või on sellega muul viisil seotud 2003. aasta ühinemisakti artikli 3 lõike 2 tähenduses.
Part 1 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as shown in Annex I.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu 1. osa (tehnilised näitajad) muudetakse vastavalt I lisas näidatule.
Part 2 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as shown in Annex II.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu 2. osa (tehnilised näitajad) punkti 2.1.4 muudetakse vastavalt II lisas näidatule.
This Decision shall apply from 1 February 2009.
Käesolevat otsust kohaldatakse alates 1. veebruarist 2009.
Part 1 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is hereby amended as follows:
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu 1. osa (tehnilised näitajad) muudetakse järgmiselt:
They must resend messages which have not been delivered, but not overload other partner systems by, for example, unnecessary repetition of messages which are thought to have been lost.’;
They must resend messages which have not been delivered, but not overload other partner systems by, for example, unnecessary repetition of messages which are thought to have been lost.”;
point 1.2.1 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 1.2.1 asendatakse järgmisega:
the Schengen States are required to have a service contract guaranteeing repairs to, and/or replacement of, hardware and software,
The Schengen States are required to have a service contract guaranteeing repairs to, and/or replacement of, hardware and software.
the Schengen States are required to have a backup system,
The Schengen States are required to have a backup system.
the Schengen States are required to equip their MTA with a preventative peripheral device to compensate any power malfunctions,
The Schengen States are required to equip their MTA with a preventative peripheral device to compensate any power malfunctions.
In case of regular maintenance, such as database backups, the maintenance slot shall not exceed a maximum of two hours,
In case of regular maintenance, such as database backups, the maintenance slot shall not exceed a maximum of two hours.
the Schengen States are to guarantee the availability of sufficient personnel during working hours to ensure operation of the MTA at the best possible rate,
The Schengen States are to guarantee the availability of sufficient personnel during working hours to ensure operation of the MTA at the best possible rate.
the Schengen States are required to distinguish clearly between the test environment and the operational environment; adapting the test environment should not affect the operational equipment and vice versa,
The Schengen States are required to distinguish clearly between the test environment and the operational environment; adapting the test environment should not affect the operational equipment and vice versa.
store the equivalent of two days operations, i.e. a maximum of 100 Megabytes,
store the equivalent of two days operations, i.e. a maximum of 100 Megabytes;
send up to 30000 messages and 30000 delivery reports per day,
send up to 30000 messages and 30000 delivery reports per day;
In addition, each Schengen State must distinguish between “retransmitting” and “resending as a new message”.
In addition, each Schengen State must distinguish between „retransmitting” and „resending as a new message”.
The term “re-send” in the next chapters (especially 1.2.2) covers both cases, but the following distinction must be made:
The term „re-send” in the next chapters (especially 1.2.2) covers both cases, but the following distinction must be made:
“retransmitting” means sending again the same message, usually subject to retransmission parameters of the MTA (e.g. sendmail, MS-Exchange, Lotus Notes).
„retransmitting” means sending again the same message, usually subject to retransmission parameters of the MTA (e.g. sendmail, MS-Exchange, Lotus Notes).
“resending as a new message” means that a new message with the same content is prepared.
„resending as a new message” means, that a new message with the same content is prepared.
Schengen States are invited to use the first possibility (retransmitting) wherever possible, to avoid the unnecessary multiplying of messages in the system.’
Schengen States are invited to use the first possibility (retransmitting) wherever possible, to avoid the unnecessary multiplying of messages in the system.”
Part 2 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is hereby amended as follows:
II LISA Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu 1. osa (tehnilised näitajad) muudetakse järgmiselt:
in point 2.1.4, Heading No 026 shall be replaced by the following:
punktis 2.1.4 asendatakse rubriik nr 026 järgmisega:
‘Heading No 026: Type of visa format: code (2)
„Heading No 026: Type of visa format: code (2)
“DC”
„DC”
long-stay visas valid concurrently as short-stay visas’;
long-stay visas valid concurrently as short-stay visas”;
in points 2.1.4 (Form A), 2.1.6 (Form C), 2.1.7 (Form F), the content of row 026 in the fifth column of the table (‘Examples/Comments’) shall be replaced by the following:
punktides 2.1.4 (Form A), 2.1.6 (Form C), 2.1.7 (Form F) asendatakse tabeli „Examples/Comments” viienda veeru rea nr 026 sisu järgmisega:
‘C B
„C ′B
′DC′’.
′DC′”.
After each retransmission there are no more messages in the system, the first message is just transmitted again;
After each retransmission there are no more messages in the system, the first message is just transmitted again.
establishing of a list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products
millega kehtestatakse traditsioonilistes taimsetes ravimites kasutatavate taimsete ainete, valmististe ja nende segude loetelu
(notified under document number C(2008) 6933)
(teatavaks tehtud numbri K(2008) 6933 all)
Having regard to Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use [1], and in particular Article 16(f) thereof,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 6. novembri 2001. aasta direktiivi 2001/83/EÜ inimtervishoius kasutatavaid ravimeid käsitlevate ühenduse eeskirjade kohta, [1] eriti selle artikli 16 punkti f,
Having regard to the opinions of the European Medicines Agency, formulated on 7 September 2007 by the Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Ravimiameti arvamust, mille on 7. septembril 2007. aastal sõnastanud taimsete ravimite komitee,
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare and Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung comply with the requirements set out in Directive 2001/83/EC.
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare ja Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung vastavad direktiivis 2001/83/EÜ sätestatud nõuetele.
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare and Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung can be considered as herbal substances, herbal preparations and/or combinations thereof.
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare’t ja Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellungi võib käsitada taimse aine, taimse valmistise ja/või nende seguna.
It is therefore appropriate to establish a list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products including the entry of Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare and the entry of Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung.
Seetõttu on asjakohane kehtestada traditsioonilistes taimsetes ravimites kasutatavate taimsete ainete, valmististe ja nende segude loetelu, mis sisaldab kandeid Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare ja Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use,
Käesolevas otsusega ette nähtud meetmed on kooskõlas inimtervishoius kasutatavate ravimite alalise komitee arvamusega,
A list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products is established in Annex I including the entry of Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare and the entry of Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung.
I lisaga kehtestatakse traditsioonilistes taimsetes ravimites kasutatavate taimsete ainete, valmististe ja nende segude loetelu, mis sisaldab kandeid Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare ja Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung.
The indications, the specified strengths and the posology, the route of administration and any other information necessary for the safe use as a traditional medicinal product relevant for Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare and Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung are set out in Annex II to this decision.
Asjakohased Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare ja Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellungi kasutamise näidustused, nende ettenähtud tugevus ja annustamine, manustamisviis ja muu teave, mis on vajalik traditsioonilise ravimi ohutuks kasutamiseks, on sätestatud käesoleva otsuse II lisas.
List of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products established in accordance with Article 16f of Directive 2001/83/EC as amended by Directive 2004/24/EC
Traditsioonilistes taimsetes ravimites kasutatavate taimsete ainete, valmististe ja nende segude loetelu, mis on kehtestatud vastavalt direktiivi 2001/83/EÜ (muudetud direktiiviga 2004/24/EÜ) artikli 16 punktile f
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare (bitter fennel fruit)
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. vulgare (Mõru apteegitill, vili)
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung (sweet fennel fruit)
Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var. dulce (Miller) Thellung (Magus apteegitill, vili)
COMMUNITY LIST ENTRY ON FOENICULUM VULGARE MILLER SUBSP.
KANNE ÜHENDUSE LOETELLU FOENICULUM VULGARE MILLER SUBSP.
Scientific name of the plant
Taime teaduslik nimetus