natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subsequently, those types of the product concerned sold domestically by the exporting producer having overall representative domestic sales, and which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community, were identified.
Seejärel selgitati välja vaatlusaluse toote liigid, mida eksportiv tootja, kelle üldine omamaine müük loeti tüüpiliseks, müüs siseturul, ning mis olid identsed või otseselt võrreldavad tooteliikidega, mida eksporditi ühendusse.
The criteria used for the identification of the different product types were the grade (pure or technical), the form (acid powder or sodium salt) and the acid concentration.
Erinevate tooteliikide määratlemiseks kasutati järgmisi kriteeriumeid: klass (puhas või tehniline), vorm (pulbriline hape või naatriumsool) ja happe kontsentratsioon.
For each product type sold by the exporting producer on its domestic market which was found to be directly comparable with the type sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Iga tooteliigi puhul, mida eksportiv tootja müüs siseturul ning mille suhtes tuvastati, et see on otseselt võrreldav tooteliigiga, mida müüdi ekspordiks ühendusse, tehti kindlaks, kas omamaine müük oli piisavalt tüüpiline algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 2 tähenduses.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the RIP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable product type exported to the Community.
Konkreetse tooteliigi omamaine müük loeti piisavalt tüüpiliseks juhul, kui vaatlusaluse tooteliigi omamaise müügi kogumaht moodustas uurimisperioodil vähemalt 5 % võrreldava tooteliigi kogu ekspordi müügimahust ühendusse.
The investigation showed that out of the three types exported by the exporting producer concerned, two were sold in representative quantities on the domestic market.
Uurimine näitas, et kolmest asjaomase eksportiva tootja eksporditavast tooteliigist kahte müüdi omamisel turul tüüpilises koguses.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of the company could be regarded as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ühtlasi uuriti ka seda, kas kõnealuse äriühingu omamaist müüki võis lugeda tavapäraseks kaubandustegevuseks vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõikele 4.
This was done by establishing the proportion of domestic sales to independent customers, of each of the two types sold in representative quantities, not sold at a loss during the RIP.
Nimetatud asjaolu uurimiseks tehti kindlaks mõlema uurimisperioodil kasumiga ja tüüpilistes kogustes sõltumatutele ostjatele siseturul müüdud tooteliigi kogused.
For these product types, since more than 80 % by volume was not sold at a loss on the domestic market, and the weighted average sales price was equal to or higher than the weighted average production cost, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of all domestic sales prices, paid or payable by independent customers, of the product type in question, as set out in Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Kuna nende tooteliikide puhul müüdi siseturul üle 80 % kasumlikult ja kuna nende kaalutud keskmine müügihind oli võrdne või kõrgem kui kaalutud keskmised tootmiskulud, siis arvutati nende tooteliikide normaalväärtus välja kõikide omamaiste müügihindade kaalutud keskmise põhjal, mida sõltumatud kliendid maksid või maksavad vaatlusaluse tooteliigi eest vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõikele 1.
For the product type which was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, normal value had to be constructed.
Selle tooteliigi puhul, mida ei müüdud siseturul tüüpilises koguses, tuli normaalväärtus tuletada.
In order to establish the constructed normal value, the cooperating exporting producer’s own sales, general and administrative (SG&A) costs incurred and weighted average profit realised on the domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the RIP, were added to the average cost of manufacturing during the RIP, pursuant to Articles 2(3) and 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Tuletatud normaalväärtuse arvutamiseks lisati vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõigetele 3 ja 6 uurimisperioodi keskmistele tootmiskuludele koostööd tegeva eksportiva tootja müügi-, üld- ja halduskulud ning uurimisperioodi jooksul tavapärase kaubandustegevuse tulemusena samasuguse toote müügist siseturul saadav kaalutud keskmine kasum.
The investigation showed that the exports of the Indian exporting producer were made only to unrelated customers in the Community.
Uurimine näitas, et India eksportiv tootja eksportis ühenduses ainult sõltumatutele klientidele.
Consequently, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
Seetõttu määrati ekspordihind vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõikele 8, nimelt tegelikult makstud või makstava ekspordihinna põhjal.
The normal value and export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normaalväärtust ja ekspordihinda võrreldi tehasehinna põhjal.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting the price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Normaalväärtuse ja ekspordihinna õiglaseks võrdlemiseks tehti vajalikud kohandused hindu ja hinnavõrreldavust mõjutavates erinevustes vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõikele 10.
These adjustments were made in respect of transport and insurance costs.
Nimetatud kohandused tehti transpordi- ja kindlustuskulude osas.
As provided by Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value of each product type of the product concerned exported to the Community in the RIP was compared to the weighted average export price of each corresponding type of the product concerned.
Vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõigetele 11 ja 12 võrreldi uurimisperioodil ühendusse eksporditud vaatlusaluse toote iga tooteliigi kaalutud keskmist normaalväärtust vaatlusaluse tootele vastava tooteliigi kaalutud keskmise ekspordihinnaga.
This comparison showed the absence of dumping for the cooperating exporting producer in India that exported to the Community during the RIP.
Kõnealune võrdlus näitas, et uurimisperioodil ühendusse eksportinud koostööd tegev India eksportiv tootja ei kasutanud dumpingut.
With regard to the absence of dumping by the cooperating exporter in the RIP, it should be noted that, as mentioned in recital 7 above, a price undertaking was in force during the RIP which required the exporting producer concerned to respect a certain price level for exports to the Community.
Kuna uurimisperioodil koostööd teinud eksportija puhul dumpingut ei tuvastatud, siis tuleks märkida, et nagu põhjenduses 7 mainitud, kehtis uurimisperioodi ajal hinnakohustus, mille kohaselt pidi asjaomane eksportiv tootja pidama ühendusse eksportimisel kinni teatavast hinnatasemest.
Certain transactions were found to be slightly higher than the level of the minimum import prices (MIPs) of the undertaking, but the majority of the sales were priced at the level of the MIPs.
Leiti, et teatavad tehingud tehti veidi kõrgemal tasemel, kui kõnealuse äriühingu minimaalne impordihind ette nägi, kuid suurem osa müügist toimus minimaalse impordihinna piires.
It is recalled that in the original investigation a dumping margin of 21 % was established.
Esialgse uurimise käigus tuvastati dumpingumarginaal 21 %.
However, following an anti-absorption reinvestigation initiated in June 2003, the dumping margin was reassessed and found to have increased to 33,7 %, as described in Regulation (EC) No 236/2004.
Juunis 2003 algatatud absorptsioonivastase kordusuurimise järel hinnati dumpingumarginaal siiski ümber ning leiti, et see on tõusnud 33,7 protsendini, nagu kirjeldatud määruses (EÜ) nr 236/2004.
In accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, the PRC is not a market economy country and therefore, the normal value for imports from the PRC had to be based on data from a market economy third country.
Algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 kohaselt ei ole Hiina puhul tegemist turumajandusliku riigiga ja seetõttu tuli Hiinast pärineva impordi puhul määrata selle normaalväärtus kolmandalt turumajandusega riigilt saadud andmete põhjal.
In the notice of initiation, India was envisaged as an appropriate market economy third country in respect to the Community exports of the PRC.
Algatamisteadaandes käsitleti Indiat kui asjakohase turumajandusega kolmandat riiki seoses Hiina ekspordiga ühendusse.
India was also used as the analogue country in the original investigation.
Indiat kasutati võrdlusriigina ka esialgses uurimises.
The applicants suggested, however, that it would be more appropriate to use the United States of America (US) as an analogue country in this case.
Taotluse esitajad leidsid siiski, et antud juhul oleks asjakohasem kasutada võrdlusriigina Ameerika Ühendriike (edaspidi „USA”).
It was argued that contrary to India, prices of sulphanilic acid in the US are driven by normal undistorted market forces.
Nad väitsid, et vastupidiselt Indiale kujundavad sulfaniilhappe hindu USAs normaalsed moonutamata turujõud.
Moreover, it was claimed that the process of producing sulphanilic acid in the US is carried out in a manner comparable to that in the PRC and that the quantities produced and sold in the US are representative.
Lisaks väitsid nad, et USAs toodetakse sulfaniilhapet viisil, mis on võrreldav tootmisprotsessiga Hiinas, ning et USAs toodetavad ja müüdavad kogused on tüüpilised.
In addition, the applicants also argued that access to raw materials in India is not comparable to access to raw materials in the PRC, as Indian producers, due to the Advance License Scheme, prefer importing raw materials instead of buying domestic materials.
Lisaks väitsid taotluse esitajad, et juurdepääs toorainele Indias ei ole võrreldav juurdepääsuga toorainele Hiinas, sest India tootjad eelistavad tänu eellubade kavale kodumaise tooraine ostmise asemel toorainet importida.
As regards the suggestion of using the US as an analogue country, it is noted that the US, for a number of years, has had protective measures in place in the form of anti-dumping measures against imports from the PRC and India as well as countervailing measures against imports from India.
Mis puudutab soovitust kasutada võrdlusriigina USAd, siis tuleb märkida, et USA on oma turu kaitseks juba mitmeid aastaid kasutanud dumpinguvastaseid meetmeid Hiina ja India impordi vastu, nagu ka tasakaalustavaid meetmeid India impordi vastu.
For this reason, it cannot be excluded that prices have been influenced by these trade defence measures.
Seetõttu ei ole võimalik välistada, et sealsed hinnad on mõjutatud nimetatud kaubavahetuse kaitsemeetmetest.
Concerning the access to raw materials, it was also found that Indian manufacturers of sulphanilic acid purchase raw materials on the domestic market.
Mis puudutab juurdepääsu toorainele, siis leiti, et India sulfaniilhappe tootjad ostavad toorainet ka siseturult.
Accordingly, it cannot be argued that access to raw materials makes India an inappropriate analogue country.
Seetõttu ei saa väita, et juurdepääs toorainele muudab India ebasobivaks võrdlusriigiks.
Moreover, there are several producers of sulphanilic acid in India and imports, for instance from the PRC, are also present on the market.
Pealegi on Indias mitmeid sulfaniilhappe tootjaid ja turul on ka näiteks Hiinast imporditud sulfaniilhapet.
There is therefore no evidence to suggest a lack of competition in India.
Seega ei ole tõendeid, mis viitaksid konkurentsi puudumisele Indias.
In light of the above, and in the absence of other convincing arguments of changed circumstances since the original investigation, it is concluded that India constitutes an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation in the context of this expiry review.
Eespool kirjeldatud asjaolusid arvesse võttes ja kuna puuduvad muud veenvad tõendid selle kohta, et asjaolud on pärast esialgset uurimist muutunud, otsustati, et käesoleva aegumisläbivaatamise raames on India sobiv võrdlusriik normaalväärtuse määramiseks vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktile a.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value was established on the basis of verified information received from the cooperating exporting producer in the analogue country.
Vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktile a määrati normaalväärtus võrdlusriigi koostööd teinud eksportivalt tootjalt saadud kontrollitud teabe põhjal.
More specifically, normal value was based on the price paid or payable in India by unrelated customers for comparable product types, as these were found to be made in the ordinary course of trade.
Täpsemalt põhines normaalväärtus hinnal, mida sõltumatud kliendid maksid või maksavad tavapärase kaubandustegevuse käigus samaväärse tooteliigi eest Indias.
Given the lack of cooperation from Chinese exporting producers, the export price had to be based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Võttes arvesse koostöö puudumist Hiina eksportivate tootjatega, tuli ekspordihind arvutada kättesaadavate faktide põhjal vastavalt algmääruse artiklile 18.
Official Eurostat figures were chosen as the appropriate basis for establishing the export price.
Eurostati ametlikud andmed leiti olevat ekspordihinna määramisel sobivaks aluseks.
For the purposes of making a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance was made for differences which could affect price comparability.
Õiglase võrdluse tegemiseks normaalväärtuse ja ekspordihinna vahel tehti vajalikud kohandused hinnavõrreldavust mõjutavates erinevustes.
These adjustments were made in respect of transport and insurance costs in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Nimetatud kohandused tehti transpordi- ja kindlustuskuludes vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõikele 10.
Normal value at Indian ex-works level was then compared to the adjusted Chinese export price at the same level.
India tehasehinna tasemel normaalväärtust võrreldi Hiina kohandatud ekspordihinnaga samal tasemel.
The comparison of normal value and export price showed the existence of dumping, the dumping margin being equal to the amount by which normal value exceeded the price for export to the Community.
Normaalväärtuse ja ekspordihinna võrdlus näitas dumpingu olemasolu, kusjuures dumpingumarginaal oli võrdne summaga, mille võrra normaalväärtus ületas ekspordihinda ühendusse müügil.
The dumping margin found, as a percentage of the CIF Community-frontier price, was in the order of 15 to 20 %.
Leiti, et dumpingumarginaal, väljendatuna protsendina hindade CIF-väärtusest ühenduse tollipiiril, oli 15–20 %.
In the absence of dumping during the RIP, it was examined whether dumping from India would be likely to recur should measures be repealed.
Kuna uurimisperioodil dumpingut ei tuvastatud, siis uuriti, kas Indiast pärineva impordi dumping võiks tõenäoliselt korduda, kui meetmed tühistataks.
In order to assess whether there was a likelihood of recurrence of dumping, the pricing behaviour of Kokan, namely its prices to other export markets in comparison with its export prices to the Community and with its domestic prices, and its production, production capacity and stocks were examined.
Selleks et hinnata dumpingu kordumise tõenäosust, uuriti Kokani hinnakäitumist, nimelt tema hindu muudel eksporditurgudel võrreldes ekspordihindadega ühenduses, samuti tema omamaiseid hindu, tema tootmist, tootmisvõimsust ja varusid.
The analysis was based on the information provided in the questionnaire reply and verified at the premises of Kokan during the investigation.
Kõnealune analüüs põhines küsimustikule antud vastustel ning seda teavet kontrolliti Kokani tootmisruumides uurimisperioodi ajal.
Relationship between prices in the Community and prices within India
Erinevus ühenduses ja Indias kehtivate hindade vahel
Prices on the Community market were higher that those achieved by Kokan on its domestic market during the RIP.
Ühenduse turul olid hinnad kõrgemad kui need, mida Kokan kasutas uurimisperioodi ajal siseturul.
This development, however, should be seen in the light of the fact that the export prices of this company were subject to the discipline of the MIPs of the undertaking.
Sellist arengut tuleb siiski vaadelda lähtudes asjaolust, et asjaomase äriühingu ekspordihindade suhtes kehtis minimaalse impordihinna kohustus.
Relationship between export prices to third countries, export prices to the Community and domestic prices in India
Erinevus kolmandatesse riikidesse ja ühendusse eksportimisel kehtinud hindade ning India omamaiste hindade vahel
It was found that the average export price charged by Kokan to third countries was significantly below its average export price to the Community.
Leiti, et Kokani kehtestatud keskmine ekspordihind kolmandatele riikidele oli märkimisväärselt madalam kui keskmine ekspordihind ühendusse eksportimisel.
It was also found that these prices were dumped as they were found to be well below the prices charged by Kokan on its domestic market.
Ühtlasi tuvastati, et nimetatud hindade puhul oli tegemist dumpinguhindadega, sest need olid palju madalamad hindadest, mida Kokan küsis India siseturul.
As mentioned in recitals 7 and 41 above, Kokan was subject to a minimum price undertaking for its exports to the Community during the RIP, whereas the prices charged to customers in other third countries were freely established.
Nagu märgitud põhjendustes 7 ja 41, kehtis uurimisperioodil Kokani ekspordi suhtes ühendusse minimaalse impordihinna kohustus, samal ajal kui muudes kolmandates riikides kehtestati klientidele hindu vabalt.
In these circumstances, the latter prices are an indication of the likely price level for export to the Community should measures be allowed to lapse.
Neid asjaolusid arvesse võttes näitavad viimati mainitud hinnad tõenäolist hinnataset toote eksportimisel ühendusse, kui meetmed tühistataks.
It was thus concluded that Kokan is likely to reduce its export prices to the Community and that dumping is likely to recur in the Community market in case measures are repealed.
Seega jõuti järeldusele, et meetmete tühistamise korral alandaks Kokan tõenäoliselt oma ekspordihindu ühendusse müügil ning dumping ühenduse turul tõenäoliselt korduks.
Relationship between export prices to third countries and the price level in the Community market
Erinevus ekspordihindades kolmandatesse riikidesse müügil ja ühenduse turul kehtivas hinnatasemes
It is also noted that export prices to third countries were found to be, on average, below the sales prices of the Community industry in the Community market.
Ühtlasi märgitakse, et ekspordihinnad kolmandatesse riikidesse müügil leiti olevat keskmiselt madalamad kui ühenduse tööstusharu müügihinnad ühenduse turul.
This means that the prevailing price level for the product concerned in the Community market makes this market very attractive for the exporting producer in India.
See tähendab, et vaatlusaluse toote valitsev hinnatase ühenduse turul muudab selle turu India eksportiva tootja jaoks väga atraktiivseks.
On this basis, it is considered that there is indeed an economic incentive to shift sales to the higher-priced Community market in case of repeal of the measures in force.
Sellest lähtuvalt leiti, et kehtivate meetmete tühistamise korral on kindlasti majanduslikult otstarbekas suunata müük kõrgemat hinda tõotavale ühenduse turule.
Unused capacities and stocks
Kasutamata tootmisvõimsused ja varud
The investigation revealed that the cooperating exporting producer did not build up stocks during the RIP.
Uurimine näitas, et koostööd tegev eksportiv tootja ei kogunud uurimisperioodi ajal varusid.
However, it was found that the company would be able to increase its production as its capacity utilisation rate was around 65 % during the RIP.
Siiski leiti, et kõnealune äriühing oleks võimeline oma tootmist suurendama, sest uurimisperioodil oli selle rakendusaste ligikaudu 65 %.
It is noted in this respect that unused production capacity of the cooperating exporting producer was found to correspond to more than 30 % of Community consumption.
Ühtlasi märgitakse, et koostööd tegeva eksportiva tootja kasutamata tootmisvõimsus kataks rohkem kui 30 % ühenduse tarbimisest.
Conclusion on India
Järeldus India kohta
The investigation clearly showed that price levels in India and in other third countries’ markets is significantly lower than the price levels in the Community market.
Uurimine näitas selgelt, et hinnatase Indias ja muude kolmandate riikide turgudel on märkimisväärselt madalam ühenduse turu hinnatasemest.
If the existing anti-dumping measures are repealed, there will be a strong incentive for the cooperating Indian exporting producer to deploy unused capacities, but also to shift more sales to the Community market and therefore to continue exporting, even at increased quantities.
Kui kehtivad dumpinguvastased meetmed tühistatakse, tekib koostööd tegeval India eksportival tootjal tugev motiiv kasutamata tootmisvõimsus käiku lasta ning ühtlasi suunata suuremaid müügikoguseid ühenduse turule ja seega jätkata eksportimist veelgi suuremates kogustest.
The assessment made above indicates that the increased quantities of exports to the Community would in all likelihood be made at dumped prices.
Eespool läbi viidud hinnang viitab sellele, et suurenenud ekspordikogused saabuksid ühendusse ülima tõenäosusega dumpinguhindadega.
Further to the finding of dumping during the RIP, the likelihood of continuation of dumping in case measures are repealed was also examined.
Lisaks dumpingu avastamisele uurimisperioodil uuriti ka dumpingu jätkumise tõenäosust, kui meetmed tühistataks.
In the absence of cooperation from any Chinese exporting producers, the conclusions below rely on facts available, namely information submitted by the applicants, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, together with data extracted from Eurostat.
Kuna Hiina eksportivad tootjaid ei teinud koostööd, siis tehti allpool esitatud järeldused olemasolevate faktide põhjal, täpsemalt teabe põhjal, mis saadi taotluse esitajatelt vastavalt algmääruse artiklile 18, ja Eurostatilt saadud andmete põhjal.
Publicly available data show that the Chinese production volume is around 22000 tonnes, which is more than double the consumption in the Community during the RIP.
Avalikult kättesaadavate andmete põhjal on Hiina praegune tootmismaht ligikaudu 22000 tonni, mis on üle kahe korra suurem ühenduse tarbimise mahust uurimisperioodil.
In the absence of cooperation from any Chinese exporting producer, no information was available as to whether spare capacities exist in the PRC.
Kuna Hiina eksportivad tootjad ei teinud koostööd, siis ei olnud võimalik saada teavet selle kohta, kas Hiinal on vaba tootmisvõimsust.
However, according to the information available, Chinese producers have the ability to use the relatively simple batch process currently used to make speciality dyes and chemicals in order to produce sulphanilic acid.
Kuid olemasoleva teabe põhjal on Hiina tootjad siiski võimelised praegu kasutatavat spetsiaalvärvide ja kemikaalide suhteliselt lihtsat partiiviisilist tootmist kasutama sulfaniilhappe tootmiseks.
Moreover, as mentioned in recital 63 below, the Community market has continued for many years to be an attractive market for Chinese exporters.
Lisaks sellele on ühenduse turg, nagu põhjenduses 63 märgitud, olnud juba mitmeid aastaid Hiina eksportijatele atraktiivne.