natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the investigation showed that the Community industry rationalised its production which was partly shifted to Member States in the European Community and at the same time had to reduce employment drastically, in particular from 2006 onwards, to reduce costs.
Lisaks näitas uurimine, et ühenduse tootmisharu ratsionaliseeris tootmise korraldust, mis viidi osaliselt üle ELi liikmesriikidesse, ning oli samal ajal sunnitud kulude kärpimiseks tööhõivet oluliselt vähendama, eriti alates 2006. aastast.
The combination of all these factors led to a situation where the Community industry managed to keep its COP during the IP to levels comparable to 2004.
Kõik need tegurid üheskoos tekitasid olukorra, mis aitas ühenduse tootmisharul hoida uurimisperioodil kulutaset 2004. aastaga võrreldavatel tasemetel.
Profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investment and ability to raise capital
Kasumlikkus, rahavood, investeeringud, investeeringutasuvus ja kapitali kaasamise võime
Cash flow (1000 EUR)
Rahavood (tuhandetes eurodes)
Investments (1000 EUR)
Investeeringud (tuhandetes eurodes)
Profitability of the Community industry was established by expressing the pre-tax net profit of the sales of the like product as a percentage to the turnover of these sales.
Ühenduse tootmisharu kasumlikkuse kindlaksmääramiseks on samasuguse toote müügist saadud maksueelne puhaskasum väljendatud protsendina müügi käibest.
Over the period considered the profitability of the Community industry decreased from a profit of 6,9 % in 2004 to a loss of 0,6 % in the IP.
Vaatlusalusel perioodil vähenes ühenduse tootmisharu kasumlikkus: kui 2004. aastal saadi 6,9 % tulu, siis uurimisperioodil langeti 0,6 % kahjumisse.
Whilst the profitability of the Community industry in 2004 and 2005 was good, the situation dramatically changed in 2006 due to a combination of factors such as the increase in the COP and the reduction in sales prices.
Ühenduse tootmisharu kasumlikkus oli 2004. ja 2005. aastal hea, kuid olukord muutus radikaalselt 2006. aastal mitmete selliste tegurite koosmõju tõttu nagu tootmiskulude suurenemine ja müügihindade vähenemine.
Although the average sales price further decreased during the IP, the reduction of the COP allowed for a result close to breakeven in that period.
Kuigi keskmine müügihind langes uurimisperioodil veelgi, aitas tootmiskulude kärpimine jõuda sel perioodil nullkasumini.
The trend shown by the cash flow, which is the ability of the industry to self-finance its activities, reflects to a large extent the evolution of profitability.
Rahavoogude liikumine, mis näitab tootmisharu suutlikkust end ise finantseerida, peegeldab suuresti kasumlikkuse arengut.
Although cash flow returned to a positive situation during the IP, it was at a much lower level than during 2004 and 2005.
Kuigi rahavood muutusid uurimisperioodil positiivseks, jäid need tunduvalt allapoole 2004. ja 2005. aasta tasemetest.
The same comments can be made about the return on investments which was negative both in 2006 and during the IP.
Sama võib öelda investeeringutasuvuse kohta, mis jäi nii 2006. aastal kui ka uurimisperioodil negatiivseks.
Despite the difficult situation, the Community industry continued to invest over the period considered.
Raskest olukorrast hoolimata jätkas ühenduse tootmisharu vaatlusalusel perioodil investeerimist.
This suggests that the industry is not ready to give up production but considers the sector to be viable.
See näitab, et tootjad ei taha tegevust lõpetada, vaid peavad sektorit elujõuliseks.
The level of investments illustrates that the sector has the ability to raise the necessary capital.
Investeeringute tase tõendab, et sektor suudab kaasata vajaliku kapitali.
The sales of the Community industry between 2004 and the IP in the Community market increased by 3 %, but the Community industry could not fully follow the expansion of Community consumption which reached 13 %.
Ühenduse tootmisharu müügimaht ühenduse turul kasvas 2004. aasta ja uurimisperioodi vahel 3 %, kuid ühenduse tootjad ei suutnud pidada sammu ühenduse tarbimisega, mis suurenes 13 %.
As a consequence, market share decreased by almost 3,7 percentage points.
Selle tulemusel vähenes turuosa peaaegu 3,7 protsendipunkti.
One sampled exporting producer in the PRC representing a limited volume of exports to the Community was not found to be dumping its products on the Community market.
Selgus, et üks valimisse kuuluv Hiina eksportiv tootja, kelle eksport ühendusse oli väiksemahuline, ei müü oma tooteid ühenduse turul dumpinguhinnaga.
For all the other sampled exporting producers however, the dumping margins, specified in recitals (84) to (89), above are significantly above de minimis.
See-eest ületasid kõigi teiste valimisse kuuluvate eksportivate tootjate dumpingumarginaalid, millele on osutatud eespool põhjendustes 84–89, tunduvalt miinimumtaset.
As explained in recital (99) above, all other exporting producers in the PRC not included in the sample, cooperating and non-cooperating, were assumed to be dumping on the Community market.
Nagu selgitatud eespool põhjenduses 99, jõuti seisukohale, et kõik teised valimist väljajäetud Hiina eksportivad tootjad sõltumata sellest, kas nad tegid koostööd või mitte, müüsid oma tooteid ühenduse turul dumpinguhinnaga.
Given the volumes and the prices of the dumped imports, the impact of the actual margin of dumping, established at 48 % on average, cannot be considered to be negligible.
Dumpinguhinnaga impordi mahtu ja hinda arvestades ei saa tegeliku dumpingumarginaali – mille keskmine suurus leiti olevat 48 % – mõju pidada tähtsusetuks.
Over the period considered it was found that the performance of the Community industry improved as regards some volume indicators such as production (+ 2 %), production capacity (+ 8 %), productivity (+ 23 %) and sales volume (+ 3 %).
Leiti, et vaatlusalusel perioodil paranes ühenduse tootmisharu majandustegevus teatavate mahunäitajate osas nagu toodang (+ 2 %), tootmisvõimsus (+ 8 %), tootlikkus (+ 23 %) ja müügimaht (+ 3 %).
However, all the indicators related to the financial situation of the Community industry significantly worsened during the period considered.
See-eest halvenesid samal perioodil märkimisväärselt kõik ühenduse tootmisharu finantsolukorda peegeldavad näitajad.
Notwithstanding the Community industry's ability to raise capital for investments, return on investments became negative in the IP and cash flow declined by 81 % over the period considered.
Ehkki ühenduse tootmisharu suutis kaasata investeeringuteks kapitali, muutus investeeringutasuvus uurimisperioodil negatiivseks ning rahavood vähenesid vaatlusalusel perioodil 81 %.
Average sales prices decreased by 9 % and profitability decreased from almost 6,9 % in 2004 to a loss of 0,6 % during the IP.
Keskmised müügihinnad langesid 9 % ning kasumlikkus langes 6,9 %-lt (2004) 0,6 %-lise kahjumini (uurimisperiood).
Moreover, other injury indicators pertaining to the Community industry also developed negatively during the period considered: capacity utilisation fell by 4 %, stocks increased by 7 % and employment fell by 13 %.
Peale selle arenes enamik ühenduse tootmisharu kahjunäitajaid vaatlusalusel perioodil negatiivses suunas: tootmisvõimsuse rakendamine langes 4 %, varud suurenesid 7 % ja tööhõive kahanes 13 %.
The market share held by the Community industry also decreased from 39,8 % in 2004 to 36,1 %, namely by 3,7 percentage points.
Ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa kahanes samuti 39,8 %-lt (2004) 36,1 %-ni ehk 3,7 protsendipunkti.
The Community industry was prevented from benefitting from the 13 % market increase as it could only increase its sales volume by 3 %.
Ühenduse tootmisharu ei saanud kasu 13 %-lisest turukasvust, sest müügimahtu suudeti suurendada kõigest 3 %.
The analysis of the costs, including raw material costs, showed that, despite a sharp increase in the price of the main raw materials, the Community industry managed to maintain unit costs in the IP at the 2004-2005 levels.
Kulude, sh toormaterjali kulude analüüs näitas, et hoolimata toormaterjali hinna järsust tõusust suutis ühenduse tootmisharu hoida uurimisperioodil ühiku kulud 2004. ja 2005. aasta tasemete juures.
However, despite an 11 % increase in demand between 2006 and the IP, sales prices decreased by 3 % and employment was drastically reduced.
Kuigi nõudlus kasvas 2006. aasta ja uurimisperioodi vahelisel ajavahemikul 11 %, langesid müügihinnad 3 % ning tööhõive vähenes tunduvalt.
Profitability still remained negative during the IP.
Kasumlikkus jäi uurimisperioodil negatiivseks.
In accordance with Articles 3(6) and 3(7) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the dumped imports of candles originating in the PRC have caused injury to the Community industry to a degree that enables it to be classified as material.
Algmääruse artikli 3 lõigete 6 ja 7 kohaselt kontrolliti, kas Hiinast pärit küünalde dumpinguhinnaga import on põhjustanud ühenduse tootmisharule kahju ulatuses, mida võiks liigitada oluliseks.
The investigation showed that the candles exported from the PRC to the Community were sold at significantly dumped prices on the Community market during the IP.
Uurimine näitas, et Hiinast ühendusse eksporditud küünlaid müüdi ühenduse turul uurimisperioodi jooksul märkimisväärselt madalate dumpinguhindadega.
As mentioned in recital (129) above, it was found that the co-operating exporting producers in the PRC were selling the product concerned with an average dumping margin of 26,2 %.
Nagu on märgitud põhjenduses 129, leiti, et Hiina koostööd tegevate eksportivate tootjate vaatlusaluse toote müügi puhul oli keskmine dumpingumarginaal 26,2 %.
It should also be outlined that around 55 % of Chinese exporters did not cooperate in the investigation.
Tuleks märkida, et umbes 55 % Hiina eksportijatest ei teinud uurimise käigus koostööd.
There is positive evidence showing that these exporters were dumping more than those who cooperated in the investigation.
On olemas tõendid selle kohta, et kõnealused eksportijad müüsid madalama dumpinguhinnaga kui eksportijad, kes tegid uurimise käigus koostööd.
Dumped imports increased in volume by 36 % on the Community market during the period considered.
Dumpinguhinnaga impordi maht ühenduse turul suurenes vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul 36 %.
This increase was made at significantly dumped prices undercutting on average by 9 % the prices of the Community industry during the IP.
See toimus märkimisväärselt madalate dumpinguhindadega, mis lõid uurimisperioodil ühenduse tootmisharu hindu alla keskmiselt 9 %.
As explained in recital (108) above the investigation revealed that undercutting by dumped imports was even more pronounced, namely 12,1 % in the core market segment of the Community industry.
Nagu on selgitatud põhjenduses 108, näitas uurimine, et dumpinguhinnaga import lõi hindu veelgi rohkem alla (12,1 %) ühenduse tootmisharu peamises turulõigus.
Accordingly, the market share held by exporters practicing dumping grew from around 27,5 % to around 33 %, an increase of more than 5 percentage points during the IP.
Sellest tulenevalt kasvas dumpinguhinnaga eksportijate turuosa umbes 27,5 %-lt umbes 33 %-ni, mis tähendab üle 5 protsendipunkti suurust kasvu uurimisperioodi jooksul.
Based on the Eurostat import statistics it appears that dumped imports increased relatively more in the categories which include the core products produced and sold by the Community industry.
Eurostati impordistatistika põhjal ilmneb, et dumpinguhinnaga import suurenes rohkem kategooriates, kuhu kuuluvad ühenduse tootmisharu toodetavad ja müüdavad põhitooted.
Dumped imports in this segment of the market rose by 46 % and around 3,5 percentage points of market share were gained by dumped imports in that segment.
Selles turulõigus suurenes dumpinguhinnaga import 46 % ja dumpinguhinnaga import hõlmas umbes 3,5 protsendipunkti suurust turuosa.
This evolution should be seen in the light of the overall significant price undercutting and price pressure exercised by dumped imports on the Community market.
Kõnealust arengut peaks vaatlema ühenduse turul dumpinguhinnaga impordist tuleneva üldise hinna allalöömise ja hinnasurve kontekstis.
At the same time, the Community industry sales volume increased only by 3 % despite an overall increase in consumption by 13 %.
Samal ajal suurenes ühenduse tootmisharu müügimaht ainult 3 %, olenemata sellest, et tarbimine kasvas 13 %.
Accordingly, its market share shrunk over the period considered from 39,8 % to 36,1 %, namely a loss of 3,7 percentage points of market share.
Sellest tulenevalt vähenes ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa vaatlusalusel perioodil 39,8 %-lt 36,1 %-ni, mis tähendab 3,7 protsendipunkti suurust turuosa kaotust.
Moreover, it was observed that in 2006 the performances of the Community industry were particularly negative as they incurred significant losses compared to 2005.
Lisaks sellele märgiti, et 2006. aastal olid ühenduse tootmisharu tulemused eriti halvad, kuna võrreldes 2005. aastaga kandis ühenduse tootmisharu märkimisväärselt suurt kahju.
This situation coincided with the continued presence of high volumes of low-priced imports from the PRC on the Community market and a 5 % decrease in Community consumption.
Samal ajal jätkus suures koguses madala hinnaga import Hiinast ühenduse turule ning tarbimine ühenduses langes 5 %.
The overall sales volume of the Community decreased at the same pace as dumped imports, while the Community industry's prices fell by 5 % to follow the price level of dumped imports.
Ühenduse müügi kogumaht vähenes sama kiiresti kui kasvas dumpinguhinnaga import, samas kui ühenduse tootmisharu hinnad langesid 5 %, et järgida dumpinguhinnaga impordi hinnataset.
Considering the period from 2006 to the end of the IP, it emerged that consumption increased by 11 %.
Ilmnes et, perioodil alates 2006. aastast kuni uurimisperioodi lõpuni kasvas tarbimine 11 %.
The Community industry managed to increase its sales volume by 8 % but dumped imports increased significantly more (+18 %) overall.
Ühenduse tootmisharul õnnestus suurendada oma müügimahtu 8 %, kuid dumpinguhinnaga import suurenes kokku oluliselt rohkem (18 %).
At the same time, prices of dumped imports fell by over 3 %.
Samal ajal langesid dumpinguhinnaga impordi hinnad üle 3 %.
The Community industry could not benefit from the growth of the market and the reduced COP.
Ühenduse tootmisharu ei saanud aga kasu ei suurenenud turust ega vähenenud tootmiskuludest.
Instead, it had to follow the decreasing trend in sales price and further decreased its prices by 2,5 % during the IP adding further losses to those incurred in 2006.
Selle asemel pidi ta järgima hinnalanguse suundumust ning oma hindu uurimisperioodil veelgi langetama (2,5 %), millest tulenevalt suurenes tootmisharu kahju lisaks 2006. aastal kantud kahjule.
It is considered that the continued pressure exercised by low-priced dumped imports on the Community market did not allow the Community industry to set its sales prices in line with its costs during the IP.
Leitakse, et madalast dumpinguhinnaga impordist tuleneva surve tõttu ühenduse turul ei saanud ühenduse tootmisharu uurimisperioodil kohandada oma müügihindu vastavalt kuludele.
This explains the loss in market share, the low level of sales prices and of the negative profitability achieved by the Community industry in that period.
See seletab ühenduse turuosa kaotust, müügihindade madalat taset ja negatiivset kasumlikkust kõnealusel perioodil.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that the surge of low-priced dumped imports from the PRC had a considerable negative impact on the economic situation of the Community industry during the IP.
Seega tehakse esialgne järeldus, et madala dumpinguhinnaga impordi järsul suurenemisel Hiinast oli oluline negatiivne mõju ühenduse tootmisharu majandusolukorrale uurimisperioodi jooksul.
Development of demand
Nõudluse kasv
As mentioned in recital (94) above, the Community consumption of candles increased by 13 % between 2004 and the IP.
Nagu on märgitud põhjenduses 94, suurenes ajavahemikul 2004. aastast kuni uurimisperioodini küünalde tarbimine ühenduses 13 %.
As this allowed the Community industry to operate in an expanding market, the material injury suffered by the Community industry cannot be attributed to the evolution of consumption on the Community market.
Kuna tänu sellele oli ühenduse tootmisharul võimalik tegutseda laieneval turul, ei saa ühenduse tootmisharu kantud oluline kahju tuleneda tarbimise arengust ühenduse turul.
Non-dumped imports
Dumpinguvaba import
The investigation showed that the imports which were not found to be dumped were sold in the Community market at a relatively high price.
Uurimine näitas, et dumpinguvaba importi müüdi ühenduse turul suhteliselt kõrge hinnaga.
Accordingly, it was considered that these imports did not contribute to the low level of sales prices and the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Sellest tulenevalt leiti, et kõnealune import ei mõjutanud müügihindade madalat taset ega ühenduse tootmisharu kantud kahju.
The trends in import volumes and prices from other third countries between 2004 and the IP were as follows:
Muude kolmandate riikide impordimahtude ja impordihindade suundumus 2004. aastast kuni uurimisperioodini oli järgmine:
The import volumes from third countries not concerned by this investigation increased by 7 % over the period considered but remained at a modest level during the IP.
Impordi maht kolmandatest riikidest, mida käesolev uuring ei hõlma, suurenes vaatlusalusel perioodil 7 %, kuid jäi uurimisperioodi jooksul mõõdukale tasemele.
These probably mainly consist in high value niche products imported in particular from the United States of America (USA).
Tegemist on arvatavasti peamiselt kallite nišitoodetega, mida imporditi eelkõige Ameerika Ühendriikidest.
The fact that the increase in Community consumption was more pronounced led to a loss of market share of 0,2 percentage points during the IP.
Tulenevalt asjaolust, et tarbimine ühenduses tõusis oluliselt, vähenes turuosa uurimisperioodil 0,2 protsendipunkti.
The prices of these imports which were relatively high during the period considered increased by 21 % over that period.
Kõnealuse impordi hinnad, mis olid vaatlusalusel perioodil suhteliselt kõrged, tõusid kõnealuse perioodi jooksul 21 %.
On the basis of the above, it was provisionally concluded these imports did not contribute to the material injury of the Community industry.
Eespool esitatu põhjal jõuti esialgsele järeldusele, et kõnealune import ei aidanud kaasa ühenduse tootmisharu kantud olulise kahju tekkimisele.
Producers in the Community not included in the definition of the Community industry
Ühenduse tootjad, keda ühenduse tootmisharu määratlus ei hõlma
As suggested in recital (92) above, the information available on the market for candles in the Community indicates that producers representing around 40 % of Community production are not included in the definition of Community industry in this investigation.
Nagu on märgitud põhjenduses 92, näitab ühenduse küünlaturgu käsitlev teave, et kõnealuses uuringus kasutatav ühenduse tootmisharu määratlus ei hõlma tootjaid, kelle toodang moodustab umbes 40 % ühenduse toodangust.
Certain Community producers, representing around 17 % of Community production, were opposed to the initiation of the investigation, because most were importing relatively large quantities of candles from the PRC.
Teatavad ühenduse tootjad, kelle toodang moodustas umbes 17 % ühenduse toodangust, olid uurimise algatamise vastu, sest enamik neist importis Hiinast küünlaid suhteliselt suures koguses.
The impact of their imports from the PRC has been taken into account in the analysis of the effect of dumped imports from the PRC made in recitals (136) to (142) above.
Nende tootjate Hiinast pärit impordi mõju on arvesse võetud dumpinguhinnaga Hiina impordi mõju analüüsimisel põhjendustes 136–142.
The remaining Community producers, representing 23 % of Community production, either were silent or neutral concerning the initiation of the present investigation.
Ülejäänud ühenduse tootjad, kelle toodang moodustab 23 % ühenduse toodangust, ei andnud endast teada või olid käesoleva uuringu algatamise suhtes erapooletud.
The analysis of data pertaining to the Community market suggested that all the other Community producers did not gain but lost market share on the sales of their own production during the period considered.
Analüüsides andmeid ühenduse turu kohta ilmnes, et kõikide teiste ühenduse tootjate turuosa vaatlusalusel perioodil nende oma toodangu osas ei suurenenud, vaid vähenes.
The investigation did not point to any particular problem concerning the competition between Community producers, on the own-produced candles, or to any trade distorting effect which may explain the material injury found for the Community industry.
Uurimise käigus ei kerkinud esile ühtegi konkreetset probleemi seoses ühenduse tootjate vahelise konkurentsiga nende endi toodetud küünalde osas või seoses mõne muu kaubandust moonutava asjaoluga, millega võiks seletada ühenduse tootmisharu kantud olulist kahju.
Based on the above, it was provisionally concluded that the producers not included in the definition of the Community industry did not contribute to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Eespool esitatu põhjal jõuti esialgsele järeldusele, et tootjad, keda ühenduse tootmisharu määratlus ei hõlma, ei aidanud kaasa ühenduse tootmisharu kantud kahju tekkimisele.
Based on Eurostat and questionnaire replies from the sampled Community producers, total exports of candles outside the Community by the Community producers increased by 10 % over the period considered, namely from 47701 tonnes in 2004 to 52565 tonnes during the IP.
Eurostati andmete ja valimisse kuuluvatelt ühenduse tootjatelt küsimustikule antud vastuste kohaselt suurenes vaatlusalusel perioodil ühenduse tootjate küünalde kogueksport ühendusest väljapoole 10 %, s.t 47701 tonnilt 2004. aastal kuni 52565 tonnini uurimisperioodil.
The main export markets are Norway, Switzerland and the USA, where the price levels are in general relatively high.
Peamised eksporditurud on Norra, Šveits ja USA, kus hinnatase on enamasti suhteliselt kõrge.
The investigation showed that the Community industry managed to increase its exports to third countries, in particular between 2005 and 2006, when Community consumption decreased by 5 %.
Uurimine näitas, et ühenduse tootmisharul õnnestus suurendada oma eksporti kolmandatesse riikidesse, eelkõige aastatel 2005–2006, mil ühenduse tarbimine vähenes 5 %.
This relatively good export performance was particularly beneficial during the IP.
Need suhteliselt head eksporditulemused tulid eelkõige kasuks uurimisperioodi jooksul.
In view of the above, it is considered that the export performance of the Community industry has not contributed to the injury suffered by that industry in the IP.
Eespool esitatu põhjal leitakse, et ühenduse tootmisharu eksporditulemused ei aidanud kaasa ühenduse tootmisharu kantud kahju tekkimisele uurimisperioodi jooksul.
Imports of candles by the Community industry
Ühenduse tootmisharu küünlaimport
Some interested parties have claimed that the imports of candles from the PRC by the Community industry were a source of self-inflicted injury.
Mõni huvitatud isik väitis, et ühenduse tootmisharu tekitas Hiinast pärit küünalde impordi kaudu endale ise kahju.
The investigation showed that some producers included in the definition of the Community industry imported candles originating in the PRC in order to complement their range of products.
Uurimine näitas, et mõni tootja, kes kuulus ühenduse tootmisharu määratluse alla, importis Hiinast pärit küünlaid oma tootevaliku täiendamiseks.
However, the purchases made during the IP were found to be low, namely less than 5 %, compared to the sales volume of the Community producers concerned.
Uurimisperioodi jooksul osteti siiski vähe, s.t alla 5 % vaatlusaluste ühenduse tootjate müügimahust.