natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the event of termination by either Iceland or Norway, this Agreement shall remain in force between the European Union and the State for which it has not been terminated.
Lepingu lõpetamisel Islandi või Norra poolt jääb leping jõusse Euroopa Liidu ja selle riigi vahel, kes ei ole seda lõpetanud.
In the event of termination by the European Union, the Agreement shall lapse.
Lepingu lõpetamisel Euroopa Liidu poolt kaotab lepingu kehtivuse.
Termination of this Agreement pursuant to paragraph 1 shall take effect six months after the deposit of the notification of termination.
Käesoleva lepingu lõpetamine lõike 1 alusel jõustub kuus kuud pärast lepingu lõpetamise teadaande hoiuleandmist.
Depository
Lepingu hoiulevõtja
The Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union shall act as the depository of this Agreement.
Käesoleva lepingu hoiulevõtja on Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu peasekretär.
The depository shall make public information on any notification made concerning this Agreement.
Lepingu hoiulevõtja avalikustab teabe mis tahes käesoleva lepinguga seoses tehtud teadaannete kohta.
Done at Stockholm on 26 November 2009 and at Brussels on 30 November 2009 in a single original in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish, Icelandic and Norwegian languages, each text being equally authentic.
Koostatud Stockholmis 26. novembril 2009 ja Brüsselis 30. novembril 2009 ühes eksemplaris bulgaaria, eesti, hispaania, hollandi, inglise, itaalia, kreeka, leedu, läti, malta, poola, portugali, prantsuse, rootsi, rumeenia, saksa, slovaki, sloveeni, soome, taani, tšehhi, ungari, islandi ja norra keeles, kusjuures kõigis nendes keeltes on tekstid võrdselt autentsed.
amending the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications)
millega muudetakse Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrku (tehnilised näitajad)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 789/2001 of 24 April 2001 reserving to the Council implementing powers with regard to certain detailed provisions and practical procedures for examining visa applications [1], and in particular Article 1(2) thereof,
võttes arvesse nõukogu 24. aprilli 2001. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 789/2001 (millega viisataotluste läbivaatamise teatavate üksikasjalike eeskirjade ja praktiliste menetluste rakendamisvolitused jäetakse nõukogule) [1], eriti selle artikli 1 lõiget 2,
Having regard to the initiative by the Czech Republic,
võttes arvesse Tšehhi Vabariigi algatust
The Schengen consultation network has been established to allow consultation between the central authorities of the Member States in relation to visa applications submitted by nationals from certain third countries.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrk loodi selleks, et võimaldada liikmesriikide keskasutustel omavahel konsulteerida seoses teatavatest kolmandatest riikidest pärit kodanike esitatud viisataotlustega.
Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code) [2] modifies the current rules applicable where a Member State has required the central authorities of other Member States to consult its central authorities during the examination of applications lodged by nationals of specific third countries or specific categories of such nationals.
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 13. juuli 2009. aasta määruse (EÜ) nr 810/2009 (millega kehtestatakse ühenduse viisaeeskiri (viisaeeskiri)) [2] artikliga 22 muudetakse kehtivaid eeskirju, mida kohaldatakse juhul, kui liikmesriik on nõudnud teiste liikmesriikide keskasutustelt konsulteerimist oma keskasutustega, kui vaadatakse läbi taotlusi, mille on esitanud teatavate kolmandate riikide kodanikud või teatavatesse kategooriatesse kuuluvad kolmandate riikide kodanikud.
The technical specifications of the Schengen consultation network should be amended accordingly.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu tehnilisi näitajaid tuleks vastavalt muuta.
Article 31 of the Visa Code allows a Member State to require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except in the case of airport transit visas.
Viisaeeskirja artikli 31 kohaselt võib liikmesriik nõuda, et tema keskasutusi teavitatakse viisadest (välja arvatud lennujaama transiidiviisad), mille teised liikmesriigid annavad teatavate kolmandate riikide kodanikele või nende riikide teatava kategooria kodanikele.
The transmission of such information requires the creation of a new form in the Schengen consultation network.
Sellise teabe edastamine eeldab, et Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu jaoks luuakse uus vorm.
The long-stay visa, concurrently valid as a short-stay visa (type ‘D + C’), will be abolished and the transit visa (type ‘B’) will be merged with the short-stay visa (type ‘C’) from the date of application of the Visa Code.
Pikaajaline viisa, mis kehtib samal ajal lühiajalise viisana (liik D+C), tühistatakse ja transiidiviisa (liik B) ühendatakse lühiajalise viisaga (liik C) alates viisaeeskirja kohaldamise kuupäevast.
The technical specifications of the Schengen consultation network should be amended accordingly and should apply from the date of application of the Visa Code.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu tehnilisi näitajaid tuleks vastavalt muuta ning neid tuleks kohaldada alates viisaeeskirja kohaldamise kuupäevast.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Euroopa Liidu lepingule ja Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingule lisatud Taani seisukohta käsitleva protokolli nr 22 artiklite 1 ja 2 kohaselt ei osale Taani käesoleva otsuse vastuvõtmisel, mistõttu see ei ole tema suhtes siduv ega kohaldatav.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of the said Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Decision, whether it will implement it in its national law.
Arvestades, et käesolev otsus põhineb Schengeni acquis’l, otsustab Taani kõnealuse protokolli artikli 4 kohaselt kuue kuu jooksul pärast nõukogu poolt käesoleva otsuse vastuvõtmist, kas ta rakendab seda oma siseriiklikus õiguses.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [4].
Islandi ja Norra puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu ning Islandi Vabariigi ja Norra Kuningriigi vahel sõlmitud lepingu (viimase kahe riigi ühinemiseks Schengeni acquis’ sätete rakendamise, kohaldamise ja edasiarendamisega) [3] tähenduses, mis kuuluvad kõnealuse lepingu teatavaid rakenduseeskirju käsitleva nõukogu 17. mai 1999. aasta otsuse 1999/437/EÜ [4] artikli 1 punktis A osutatud valdkonda.
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [6] on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of that Agreement.
Šveitsi puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist Euroopa Liidu, Euroopa Ühenduse ning Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni vahelise lepingu (Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni ühinemise kohta Schengeni acquis’ rakendamise, kohaldamise ja edasiarendamisega) [5] tähenduses, mis kuuluvad nõukogu otsuse 1999/437/EÜ artikli 1 punktis A osutatud valdkonda, kusjuures nimetatud otsuse vastavat punkti tõlgendatakse koostoimes kõnealuse lepingu Euroopa Ühenduse nimel sõlmimist käsitleva nõukogu otsuse 2008/146/EÜ [6] artikliga 3.
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, within the meaning of the Protocol signed between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/261/EC [7] on the signature, on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Protocol.
Liechtensteini puhul kujutab käesolev otsus endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist Euroopa Liidu, Euroopa Ühenduse, Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni ja Liechtensteini Vürstiriigi vahel allakirjutatud protokolli (mis käsitleb Liechtensteini Vürstiriigi ühinemist Euroopa Liidu, Euroopa Ühenduse ja Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni vahelise lepinguga Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni ühinemise kohta Schengeni acquis’ rakendamise, kohaldamise ja edasiarendamisega) tähenduses, mis kuuluvad nõukogu otsuse 1999/437/EÜ artikli 1 punktis A osutatud valdkonda, kusjuures nimetatud otsuse vastavat punkti tõlgendatakse koostoimes kõnealuse protokolli Euroopa Ühenduse nimel allkirjastamist ja selle teatavate sätete ajutist kohaldamist käsitleva nõukogu otsuse 2008/261/EÜ [7] artikliga 3.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [8]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Käesolev otsus kujutab endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist, milles Ühendkuningriik ei osale vastavalt nõukogu 29. mai 2000. aasta otsusele 2000/365/EÜ (Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigi taotluse kohta osaleda teatavates Schengeni acquis’ sätetes) [8]. Seetõttu ei osale Ühendkuningriik käesoleva otsuse vastuvõtmisel, see ei ole tema suhtes siduv ega kohaldatav.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [9].
Käesolev otsus kujutab endast nende Schengeni acquis’ sätete edasiarendamist, milles Iirimaa ei osale vastavalt nõukogu 28. veebruari 2002. aasta otsusele 2002/192/EÜ (Iirimaa taotluse kohta osaleda teatavates Schengeni acquis’ sätetes) [9].
As regards Cyprus, this Decision constitutes an act building upon the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Küprose puhul on käesolev otsus Schengeni acquis’l põhinev või sellega muul viisil seotud akt 2003. aasta ühinemisakti artikli 3 lõike 2 tähenduses.
This Decision constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession,
Käesolev otsus on Schengeni acquis’l põhinev või sellega muul viisil seotud akt 2005. aasta ühinemisakti artikli 4 lõike 2 tähenduses,
Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) are hereby amended as set out in Annexes I, II, III and IV respectively.
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu (tehnilised näitajad) 1., 2., 3. ja 4. osa muudetakse vastavalt I, II, III ja IV lisas esitatule.
It shall apply from 5 April 2010.
Otsust kohaldatakse alates 5. aprillist 2010.
OJ L 243, 15.9.2009, p. 1.
ELT L 243, 15.9.2009, lk 1.
Part 1 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as follows:
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu (tehnilised näitajad) 1. osa muudetakse järgmiselt:
in point 1.1.2., the last subparagraph shall be deleted;
punkti 1.1.2 viimane lõik jäetakse välja;
in point 1.1.3., the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
punkti 1.1.3 esimene lõik asendatakse järgmisega:
‘The application developed by each Member State reads delivery notifications from the inbox — on the basis of FORM R — and checks whether there is a corresponding delivery notification (FORM R) for every sent A, B, C, E, F, G or H form, which contained the “Document unifier”. The “Document unifier” is a unique context string — which identifies the mail — in the line beginning with the numbers “000”.’;
„The application developed by each Member State reads delivery notifications from the inbox — on the basis of FORM R — and checks whether there is a corresponding delivery notification (FORM R) for every sent A, B, C, E, F, G or H form, which contained the “Document unifier”. The “Document unifier” is a unique context string — which identifies the mail — in the line beginning with the numbers “000”.”;
in point 1.3., the fourth subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
punkti 1.3 neljas lõik asendatakse järgmisega:
‘The “Subject” item of the message contains “file number” and a full stop (“.”) followed by the form-type identifier (Letter: “A”, “B”, “C”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H” or “R”).
„The “Subject” item of the message contains “file number” and a full stop (“.”) followed by the form-type identifier (Letter: “A”, “B”, “C”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H” or “R”).
Subject FRA2007022457471104.E’.
Subject FRA2007022457471104.E”.
Part 2 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as follows:
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu (tehnilised näitajad) 2. osa muudetakse järgmiselt:
Detailed information can be found in 3.1 “LIST OF FUNCTIONALITIES”.
Detailed information can be found in 3.1 „LIST OF FUNCTIONALITIES”.
FORM A “CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”
FORM A „CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”
FORM B “REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”
FORM B „REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”
FORM C “NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF VLTV”
FORM C „NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF VLTV”
FORM F “VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM F „VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM G “RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM G „RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM E “ERROR MESSAGE”
FORM E „ERROR MESSAGE”
FORM R “DELIVERY NOTIFICATION”
FORM R „DELIVERY NOTIFICATION”
FORM H “NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA”
FORM H „NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA”
For the sake of clarity, the notification of the delivery is not stated explicitly in the following flow samples.’;
For the sake of clarity, the notification of the delivery is not stated explicitly in the following flow samples.”;
in point 2.1.1.1, the following changes shall be introduced:
punkti 2.1.1.1 muudetakse järgmiselt:
‘Four forms – A, B, C and H – are exchanged via the network.
„Four forms – A, B, C and H – are exchanged via the network.
If the applicant has a nationality or belongs to a category of such a national for whom prior consultation is requested by a/some Member State(s) consultation of those States' central authority is required pursuant to Article 22 of the Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of 13 July 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)the third subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
If the applicant has a nationality or belongs to a category of such a national for whom prior consultation is requested by a/some Member State(s) consultation of those States' central authority is required pursuant to Article 22 of the Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of 13 July 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)kolmas lõik asendatakse järgmisega:
‘If the consulting (requesting) authority issues a VLTV it notifies this to all Member States by sending C FORMs.’;
„If the consulting (requesting) authority issues a VLTV it notifies this to all Member States by sending C FORMs.”;
below the table (Fig. 2), the following subparagraph shall be added:
tabeli (Fig. 2) järele lisatakse järgmine lõik:
‘According to Article 31 of the Visa Code a Member State may require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except when an airport transit visa is issued. This information is transmitted by sending an H-FORM.’;
„According to Article 31 of the Visa Code a Member State may require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except when an airport transit visa is issued. This information is transmitted by sending an H-FORM.”;
point 2.1.1.2 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.1.1.2 asendatakse järgmisega:
‘If and only if a State intends to represent another State or to be represented by another State, the consultation procedure shall meet the requirements referred to in Article 8 of the Visa Code and in the representation arrangements concerned, as described in the below sample process pictures (pictures 1 and 2).
„If and only if a State intends to represent another State or to be represented by another State, the consultation procedure shall meet the requirements referred to in Article 8 of the Visa Code and in the representation arrangements concerned, as described in the below sample process pictures (pictures 1 and 2).
Picture 1 —
Picture 1 -
Picture 2 —
Picture 2 -
The consultation procedure (7 calendar days) and any further communication between the represented State and representing State in relation to the decision process (e.g. exchange of forms F and G) has to be done within 15 calendar days in accordance with Article 23(1) of the Visa Code.’;
The consultation procedure (7 calendar days) and any further communication between the represented State and representing State in relation to the decision process (e.g. exchange of forms F and G) has to be done within 15 calendar days in accordance with Article 23(1) of the Visa Code.”;
in point 2.1.2, the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
punkti 2.1.2 esimene lõik asendatakse järgmisega:
in point 2.1.4, the following changes shall be introduced:
punkti 2.1.4 muudetakse järgmiselt:
in the table, heading ‘027’ shall be replaced by the following:
rubriik nr 027 asendatakse tabelis järgmisega:
CZE (see 2.2.1)’;
CZE (see 2.2.1)”;
heading ‘023’ shall be replaced by the following:
rubriik nr 023 asendatakse järgmisega:
heading ‘026’ shall be replaced by the following:
rubriik nr 026 asendatakse järgmisega:
headings 029, 030, 031 and 032 shall be deleted;
rubriigid nr 029, 030, 031 ja 032 jäetakse välja;
the following heading shall be added:
lisatakse järgmine rubriik:
(*4) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.’;
(*4) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.”;
in the explanation, below the table, the following changes shall be introduced:
tabeli all esitatud selgitust muudetakse järgmiselt:
heading ‘027’ shall be replaced by the following:
rubriik nr 027 asendatakse järgmisega
‘Heading No. 027: Main destination
„Heading No. 027: Main destination
This refers to the Member State or Member States (max 3) of main destination where the visa applicant should stay.’;
This refers to the Member State or Member States (max 3) of main destination where the visa applicant should stay.”;
‘Heading No. 023: Border of entry
„Heading No. 023: Border of entry
This refers to the applicant’s information about the State of first entry.’;
This refers to the applicant’s information about the State of first entry.”;
‘Heading No. 026: Type of visa
„Heading No. 026: Type of visa
“C” visas type is to be used.’;
„C” visas type is to be used.”;
‘Heading No. 099: Reference number of the application in the VIS format: alphanumblank (33)
099: Reference number of the application in the VIS format: alphanumblank (33)
The maximum total length has to be 33 characters.’;
The maximum total length has to be 33 characters.”;
point 2.1.5 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.1.5 asendatakse järgmisega:
FORM B: “REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”
FORM B: „REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”
“2”
„2”
alphanumblank (33)
alphanumblank (33) CZE200907264365
CZE200907264365
Heading No.
Heading No. 000 & Heading No. 001:
000 & Heading No. 001:
See FORM A: “CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”.
See FORM A: „CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”. Heading No.
Heading No. 040: Reply reference
040: Reply reference
16 free bytes for identification at national level.
16 free bytes for identification at national level. Heading No.
Heading No. 041: Reply
041: Reply
“1” explicit approval within the deadline of 7 calendar days.
„1” explicit approval within the deadline of 7 calendar days.
“2” refusal within the deadline of 7 calendar days.
„2” refusal within the deadline of 7 calendar days. Heading No.
Heading No. 042: Date of reply
042: Date of reply
This is the date the consulted central authority formulates its reply.
This is the date the consulted central authority formulates its reply. Heading No.
See FORM A: “CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”.’;
See FORM A: „CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”.”;
in Point 2.1.6, the following changes shall be introduced:
punkti 2.1.6 muudetakse järgmiselt:
in the table, heading ‘045’ shall be replaced by the following:
rubriik nr 045 asendatakse tabelis järgmisega:
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code “D” for Germany.’;
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code “D” for Germany.”;
(*5) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.’;
(*5) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.”;
heading ‘045’ shall be replaced by the following:
rubriik nr 045 asendatakse järgmisega:
‘Heading No. 045: Visa number
„Heading No. 045: Visa number
The total number of characters shall amount to 12‘Heading No. 000 & Heading No. 001 & Remaining headings’ shall be replaced by the following:
000 & Heading No. 001 & Remaining headings” asendatakse järgmisega:
‘Other headings:
„Other headings:
in point 2.1.7, the following changes shall be introduced:
punkti 2.1.7 muudetakse järgmiselt:
in the explanation, below the table, ‘Headings’ shall be replaced by the following:
tabeli all esitatud selgituses asendatakse tekst „Headings” järgmisega:
point 2.1.8 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.1.8 asendatakse järgmisega:
FORM G: “RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM G: „RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
“5”
„5”
“5” approval for LTV
„5” approval for LTV Heading No.
Heading No. 101: Comments
101: Comments
See FORM B: ‘REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”.’;
See FORM B: ‘REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”.”;
point 2.1.9 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.1.9 asendatakse järgmisega:
FORM E: “ERROR MESSAGE”
FORM E: „ERROR MESSAGE”
Heading No. 047: Reference of error message
047: Reference of error message