natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
16 bytes for the national identification number
16 bytes for the national identification number Heading No.
Heading No. 048: Document reference (erroneous form)
048: Document reference (erroneous form)
“Reference number of request”, (heading 001 of a referred “A” or “F”).
„Reference number of request”, (heading 001 of a referred „A” or „F”).
“Reference number of reply”, (heading 040 of a referred “B” or “G”).
„Reference number of reply”, (heading 040 of a referred „B” or „G”).
“Reference of the decision”, (heading 044 of a referred “C” or “H”).
„Reference of the decision”, (heading 044 of a referred „C” or „H”). Heading No.
Heading No. 049: Type of form
049: Type of form
“A”, “B”, “C”, “F”, “G” or “H”.
„A”, „B”, „C”, „F”, „G” or „H”. Heading No.
Heading No. 050: Type of error
050: Type of error
“1” technical error
„1” technical error
“2” logical error
„2” logical error Heading No.
Heading No. 051: Reason for the technical error
051: Reason for the technical error
If error code 1 appears under heading No. 050, the number of the heading of the document which contains the first error must compulsorily be entered under heading No. 051.
If error code 1 appears under heading No. 050, the number of the heading of the document which contains the first error must compulsorily be entered under heading No. 051. Heading No.
Heading No. 052: Reason for the logical error
052: Reason for the logical error
“01” Reply received too late
„01” Reply received too late
“02” No consultation/information required
„02” No consultation/information required
“03” Reply was not taken into account since visa of limited territorial validity has been issued in the meantime
„03” Reply was not taken into account since visa of limited territorial validity has been issued in the meantime
“04” Form received in duplicate
„04” Form received in duplicate
“05” Unknown which form was received
„05” Unknown which form was received
The national applications shall be adapted in such a way that the statistics generated on Form E enable distinction of the number of error messages caused by technical errors (code = “1” under Heading No. 050) and logical errors (code = “2” under Heading No. 050).
The national applications shall be adapted in such a way that the statistics generated on Form E enable distinction of the number of error messages caused by technical errors (code = „1” under Heading No. 050) and logical errors (code = „2” under Heading No. 050).
It is prohibited to scan a form E itself for logical or technical failures and to reply to a malformed E by another form E to prevent a cumulative process – “Snowball Effect”.’;
It is prohibited to scan a form E itself for logical or technical failures and to reply to a malformed E by another form E to prevent a cumulative process – „Snowball Effect”.”;
In point 2.1.10. under ‘Additional rules for form R’, the second bullet point shall be replaced by the following:
punktis 2.1.10 asendatakse pealkirja „Additional rules for form R” all esitatud teine lõik järgmisega: „If a Member State receives an alleged erroneous form R, it has to discard this form R without processing it.
‘If a Member State receives an alleged erroneous form R, it has to discard this form R without processing it. This means that the Member State should ignore forms R that seem to be invalid. Consequently an application which had to discard potentially malformed forms R will have remaining, unacknowledged forms A,…, H which will have to be resent until a valid form R arrives. If the problem persists it has to be solved bilaterally by technical staff.’;
This means that the Member State should ignore forms R that seem to be invalid. Consequently an application which had to discard potentially malformed forms R will have remaining, unacknowledged forms A,…, H which will have to be resent until a valid form R arrives. If the problem persists it has to be solved bilaterally by technical staff.”;
After point 2.1.10, the following point shall be added:
punkti 2.1.10 järele lisatakse järgmine punkt:
FORM H: “NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA”
FORM H: „NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA”
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code “D” for Germany.
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code „D” for Germany.
“M”
„M”
“X”
„X”
1 (see2.2.6)
1 (see 2.2.6)
Point 2.2.3 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.2.3 asendatakse järgmisega:
99 OTHERS’;
99 OTHERS”;
Point 2.2.4 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.2.4 asendatakse järgmisega:
99 OTHER’.
99 OTHER”.
OJ L 243, 15.9.2009, p. 1.’;
OJ L 243, 15.9.2009, p. 1.”;
See Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 856/2008 of 24 July 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 laying down a uniform format for visas as regards the numbering of visas (OJ L 235, 2.9.2008, p. 1).’;
See Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 856/2008 of 24. juuli 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 laying down a uniform format for visas as regards the numbering of visas (OJ L 235, 2.9.2008, p. 1).”;
Part 3 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as follows:
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu (tehnilised näitajad) 3. osa muudetakse järgmiselt:
Point 3.1. shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 3.1 asendatakse järgmisega:
Prepare, send and retrieve a “R — Delivery Notification” form
Prepare, send and retrieve a „R — Delivery Notification” form
Send form types A, B, C, E, G, F or H:
Send form types A, B, C, E, G, F or H: Fig.
Fig. 4: Message Exchange Function Sequence.’;
4: Message Exchange Function Sequence.”;
In point 3.2.1., the title shall be replaced by the following:
punktis 3.2.1 asendatakse pealkiri järgmisega:
‘Preparing Form “A, B, C, E, G, F or H”’;
„Preparing Form „A, B, C, E, G, F or H” ”;
In point 3.2.2., the title shall be replaced by the following:
punktis 3.2.2 asendatakse pealkiri järgmisega:
‘Sending Form “A, B, C, E, G, F or H” via the Network’;
„Sending Form „A, B, C, E, G, F or H” via the Network”;
In point 3.2.3., the title shall be replaced by the following:
punktis 3.2.3 asendatakse pealkiri järgmisega:
‘Retrieving Form “A, B, C, E, G, F or H”’;
„Retrieving Form „A, B, C, E, G, F or H” ”;
In point 3.2.4., the following changes shall be introduced:
punkti 3.2.4 muudetakse järgmiselt:
‘Preparing, Transmitting and Retrieving a Delivery Notification for Form “A, B, C, E, G, F or H”’;
„Preparing, Transmitting and Retrieving a Delivery Notification for Form „A, B, C, E, G, F or H” ”;
paragraph a.) shall be replaced by the following:
punkt a asendatakse järgmisega:
When the national application has received the form it shall prepare an “R” form in order to acknowledge the form of type “A, B, C, E, G, F and H” (each document that contains a line that starts with ′000.′) that was received.
When the national application has received the form it shall prepare an „R” form in order to acknowledge the form of type „A, B, C, E, G, F and H” (each document that contains a line that starts with ′000.′) that was received.
The structure of the “R” form is described in 2.1.10 FORM R: “DELIVERY NOTIFICATION”
The structure of the „R” form is described in 2.1.10 FORM R: „DELIVERY NOTIFICATION”
The “R” Form is to be prepared and transmitted in direct connection to the reception of the form of type “A, B, C, E, G, F or H”.
The „R” Form is to be prepared and transmitted in direct connection to the reception of the form of type „A, B, C, E, G, F or H”.
The procedure for preparing, sending and retrieving the “R” Form is otherwise the same as described in steps 1, 2 and 3 above for the normal forms.’.
The procedure for preparing, sending and retrieving the „R” Form is otherwise the same as described in steps 1, 2 and 3 above for the normal forms.”.
Part 4 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as follows:
Schengeni konsultatsioonivõrgu (tehnilised näitajad) 4. osa muudetakse järgmiselt:
Point 4.2.1. shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 4.2.1 asendatakse järgmisega:
E(log) – received E Forms due to the logical errors in forms which have been sent to the other Member States’;
E(log) – received E Forms due to the logical errors in forms which have been sent to the other Member States”;
Point 4.2.2. shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 4.2.2 asendatakse järgmisega:
XY 24’.
XY 24”.
point 2.1.1 shall be replaced by the following:
punkt 2.1.1 asendatakse järgmisega:
‘The general process flow of documents may be described shortly as follows.
„The general process flow of documents may be described shortly as follows.
‘Each heading is identified by a number ranging from 001 to 999, followed by the separation sign “.”, the value of the heading and (=Hexa: 0X0D resp. 0X0A) or (=Hexa:0X0A). The leading numbers refer to the headings in a form (A, B, C, F, G, H, E, R).’;
„Each heading is identified by a number ranging from 001 to 999, followed by the separation sign „.”, the value of the heading and (=Hexa: 0X0D resp. 0X0A) or (=Hexa:0X0A). The leading numbers refer to the headings in a form (A, B, C, F, G, H, E, R).”;
Unique number for identifying the visa sticker, consisting of one or three letter(s) identifying the State, supplemented with TELEX characters if needed and a sequence number of the visa sticker.
Unique number for identifying the visa sticker, consisting of one or three letter(s) identifying the State, supplemented with TELEX characters if needed and a sequence number of the visa sticker. The total number of characters shall amount to 12tekst „Heading No.
appointing three Polish members and two Polish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
Regioonide Komitee kolme Poola liikme ja kahe Poola asendusliikme ametisse nimetamise kohta
Having regard to the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingut, eriti selle artiklit 305,
Having regard to the proposal of the Polish Government,
võttes arvesse Poola valitsuse ettepanekut
Three members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rafal DUTKIEWICZ, Mr Krzysztof SZYMAŃSKI and Mr Brunon SYNAK.
Regioonide Komitees on vabanenud kolm liikmekohta seoses Rafal DUTKIEWICZI, Krzysztof SZYMAŃSKI ja Brunon SYNAKI ametiaja lõppemisega.
One alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Norbert OBRYCKI.
Üks asendusliikme koht on vabanenud seoses Norbert OBRYCKI ametiaja lõppemisega.
An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the appointment of Mr Konstanty DOMBROWICZ as a member of the Committee of the Regions,
Üks asendusliikme koht on vabanenud seoses Konstanty DOMBROWICZI nimetamisega Regioonide Komitee liikmeks,
Mr Konstanty DOMBROWICZ, prezydent miasta Bydgoszczy (change of mandate),
Konstanty DOMBROWICZ, Prezydent Miasta Bydgoszczy (volituste muutus),
Mr Marcin JABŁOŃSKI, marszałek województwa lubuskiego,
Marcin JABŁOŃSKI, Marszałek Województwa Lubuskiego,
Mr Jan KOZŁOWSKI, marszałek województwa pomorskiego,
Jan KOZŁOWSKI, Marszałek Województwa Pomorskiego
Mr Władysław HUSEJKO, marszałek województwa zachodniopomorskiego,
Władysław HUSEJKO, Marszałek Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego,
Ms Elżbieta RUSIELEWICZ, Radna Miasta Bydgoszczy.
Elżbieta RUSIELEWICZ, Radna Miasta Bydgoszczy.
appointing a Portuguese member of the Committee of the Regions
Regioonide Komitee Portugali liikme ametissenimetamise kohta
Having regard to the proposal of the Portuguese Government,
võttes arvesse Portugali valitsuse ettepanekut
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of the mandate of Mr José MACÁRIO CORREIA,
Regioonide Komitees on vabanenud üks liikme koht seoses José MACÁRIO CORREIA ametiaja lõppemisega,
Mr José MACÁRIO CORREIA, Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Faro.
José MACÁRIO CORREIA, Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Faro.
Decision No 1041/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu otsus nr 1041/2009/EÜ,
establishing an audiovisual cooperation programme with professionals from third countries
millega kehtestatakse kolmandate riikide valdkondlike asjatundjatega audiovisuaalvaldkonna koostööprogramm
The audiovisual sector contributes to achieving the goals of the Lisbon Agenda, namely to boost competitiveness, skills, growth and jobs in a knowledge-based economy.
Audiovisuaalsektor aitab kaasa Lissaboni tegevuskava eesmärkide saavutamisele, toetades konkurentsivõimet, oskusi, majanduskasvu ja tööhõivet teadmistepõhises majanduses.
It plays a major role in the context of the i2010 initiative — the policy umbrella for the European information society and media policies — in the framework of the Lisbon Agenda.
Lissaboni tegevuskava raames on sellel sektoril väga oluline osa Euroopa infoühiskonna ja meediapoliitika poliitilise raamistiku ehk algatuse i2010 kontekstis.
The European Parliament has consistently emphasised that the audiovisual sector makes an important contribution to the European creative and knowledge economy and plays a central role in promoting cultural diversity and pluralism, as well as being an important platform for freedom of speech.
Euroopa Parlament on järjepidevalt rõhutanud, et audiovisuaalsektori panus Euroopa teadmistepõhisesse ja loomemajandusse on märkimisväärne ning sellel on keskne roll kultuurilise mitmekesisuse ja paljususe edendamisel, samuti on see oluline sõnavabaduse platvorm.
The cultural and creative sectors contribute substantially to the European cultural economy and in 2004 creative industries employed at least 5,8 million people, equivalent to 3,1 % of the total employed EU-25 population.
Euroopa kultuuri- ja loomesektor annab olulise panuse Euroopa kultuurimajandusse ning 2004. aastal andis loomesektor tööd vähemalt 5,8 miljonile inimesele, mis moodustab 3,1 % Euroopa Liidu 25 liikmesriigi (EL 25) töötajaskonnast.
Community support to the audiovisual sector takes into account Article 151 of the Treaty, which states that the Community and the Member States shall foster cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the sphere of culture, and that the Community shall take cultural aspects into account in its action, in particular in order to respect and to promote the diversity of its cultures.
Audiovisuaalsektori toetamisel ühenduse vahenditega võetakse arvesse asutamislepingu artiklit 151, mille kohaselt ühendus ja liikmesriigid soosivad kultuurialast koostööd kolmandate riikide ja pädevate rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonidega, ning seda, et ühendus võtab oma tegevuses arvesse kultuurilisi aspekte, eelkõige eesmärgiga austada ja edendada oma kultuurilist mitmekesisust.
In its resolution of 16 November 2007 on a European Agenda for Culture [4], the Council considered that culture was a vital element of international relations and underlined the need to enhance its role in the EU’s external relations and development policy.
Euroopa kultuurivaldkonna tegevuskava käsitlevas 16. novembri 2007. aasta nõukogu resolutsioonis [4] tõdeti, et kultuur on üks rahvusvaheliste suhete olulisemaid elemente, ning rõhutati vajadust suurendada selle osa ELi välissuhetes ja arengupoliitikas.
The European Parliament, in its resolution of 10 April 2008 on a European agenda for culture in a globalising world, also underlined, with respect to the Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, the importance of integrating a cultural dimension into all policies and programmes, including external policies and development.
Euroopa kultuurivaldkonna tegevuskava üleilmastuvas maailmas käsitlevas 10. aprilli 2008. aasta resolutsioonis rõhutas Euroopa Parlament seoses Unesco kultuuri väljendusvormide mitmekesisuse kaitse ja edendamise konventsiooniga ka seda, et oluline on integreerida kultuurimõõde kõikidesse poliitikatesse ja programmidesse, sealhulgas välis- ja arengupoliitikasse.
On 21 November 2008 the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, adopted conclusions on the promotion of cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue in the external relations of the Union and its Member States [5].
Nõukogu ja nõukogus kokku tulnud liikmesriikide valitsuste esindajad võtsid 21. novembril 2008 vastu järeldused kultuurilise mitmekesisuse ja kultuuridevahelise dialoogi edendamise kohta Euroopa Liidu ja selle liikmesriikide välissuhetes [5].
The Commission’s communication of 8 June 2006 on ‘Europe in the world’ emphasises the inextricable link between the EU’s internal and external policies, and stresses that Europe has the potential to share in the new opportunities created by emerging markets and globalisation, as it has an open society that can absorb people, ideas and new technologies.
Komisjoni 8. juuni 2006. aasta teatises „Euroopa maailmas” toonitatakse ELi sise- ja välispoliitika lahutamatut seotust ning Euroopa potentsiaali osaleda tekkivate turgude ja üleilmastumisega kaasnevate uute võimaluste kasutamises tänu oma ühiskonna avatusele, mis suudab omaks võtta inimesi, ideid ja uusi tehnoloogiaid.
The European Union was a major player in the process leading to the adoption of the Unesco Convention on the Protection and the Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions which entered into force on 18 March 2007, following the ratification by the European Community and 13 Member States on 18 December 2006.
Euroopa Liit oli üks põhiosalisi protsessis, mille tulemusel võeti vastu 18. märtsil 2007 jõustunud Unesco kultuuri väljendusvormide mitmekesisuse kaitse ja edendamise konventsioon, mille Euroopa Ühendus ja 13 liikmesriiki 18. detsembril 2006 ratifitseerisid.
The Convention’s aim is to strengthen international cooperation and solidarity so as to favour the cultural expressions of all countries.
Konventsiooni eesmärk on tugevdada rahvusvahelist koostööd ja solidaarsust, et soodustada kõigi riikide kultuurilisi väljendusvõimalusi.
According to Article 12(e) of the Convention, parties to the Convention ‘shall encourage the conclusion of co-production and co-distribution agreements’.
Konventsiooni artikli 12 punkti e kohaselt „toetavad konventsiooni osalised ühistootmist ja ühislevitamist käsitlevate lepingute sõlmimist”.
A number of Member State activities aim at increasing cooperation between European and third countries’ audiovisual industries, such as international co-production funds and co-production treaties.
Palju liikmesriikide meetmetest, nagu rahvusvahelised ühistootmisfondid ja -lepingud, on suunatud koostöö tihendamisele Euroopa Liidu ja kolmandate riikide audiovisuaaltööstuse vahel.
Community support will be complementary to such actions.
Selliseid meetmeid täiendatakse ühenduse toetusega.
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in Article 11, recognises freedom of expression and pluralism of the media.
Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta artiklis 11 tunnustatakse väljendusvabaduse ja meediakanalite paljususe olulisust.
The evaluation report of the MEDIA Plus programme identified the importance of international markets to overcoming the problems of the European audiovisual industry.
Programmi MEDIA Plus hindamisaruandes märgiti rahvusvaheliste turgude olulisust Euroopa audiovisuaaltööstuse probleemide ületamisel.
The international audiovisual landscape has changed significantly over the last two decades and is currently facing new challenges, notably under the impact of technological developments such as digital cinema projection, video on demand (VOD) or multi-channel digital television.
Rahvusvaheline audiovisuaalmaastik on viimase kahe kümnendi jooksul tunduvalt muutunud ning seisab nüüd silmitsi uute väljakutsetega just tehnoloogilise arengu tõttu, mille näiteks on digitaalne kinoprojektsioon, nõudevideoteenus (VoD) ja paljude kanalitega digitaaltelevisioon.
This has created strong financial growth and promising investments and, consequently, a strong and growing demand for more audiovisual content, offering numerous opportunities to companies.
Sellega on kaasnenud tugev finantskasv ja paljulubavad investeeringud ning seega ka kasvav nõudlus audiovisuaalsisu järele, mis pakub ettevõtjatele rohkeid võimalusi.
Accordingly, there is a strong and increasing interest in developing projects relating to the various digital applications.
Seetõttu tuntakse erinevate digitaalsete rakendustega seotud projektide vastu üha suurenevat huvi.
In addition, there is a strong link between international cooperation on projects and the Union’s ability to promote in the world its regulatory model on audiovisual issues and the convergence between audiovisual and electronic communications.
Samuti on olemas selge seos projektide elluviimiseks toimuva rahvusvahelise koostöö ja liidu suutlikkuse vahel edendada maailmas oma õiguslikku mudelit, mis käsitleb audiovisuaalküsimusi ning audiovisuaalse ja elektroonilise side lähenemist.
Given the increasing importance of the international dimension of audiovisual policy, the European Parliament, on 13 December 2007, adopted, in the 2008 budget, a preparatory action MEDIA International, that focuses on developing the Union’s relations with third-country audiovisual markets and provides the opportunity for structuring and strengthening relations and networks between European and third-country professionals in the audiovisual sector, for the mutual benefit of the European industry and the third countries involved.
Arvestades audiovisuaalpoliitika rahvusvahelise mõõtme kasvavat olulisust võttis Euroopa Parlament 13. detsembril 2007. aastal vastu 2008. aasta eelarve raames ettevalmistava meetme MEDIA International, mis keskendub liidu suhete arendamisele audiovisuaaltoodangu turgudega kolmandates riikides ning annab sellega võimaluse struktureerida ning tugevdada suhteid ja võrgustikke Euroopa ja kolmandate riikide audiovisuaalvaldkonna asjatundjate vahel nii Euroopa kui ka asjaomaste kolmandate riikide tööstusharu huvides.
The subsequent call for proposals attracted great interest from both European and third-country professionals.
Sellele järgnenud projektikonkurss äratas elavat huvi nii Euroopa kui ka kolmandate riikide valdkondlike asjatundjate hulgas.
Eighteen projects were selected for support.
Rahastamiseks valiti välja 18 projekti.
The first year of the preparatory action MEDIA International thus confirmed the sector’s interests and needs in the international field and the necessity for Community action.
Ettevalmistava meetme MEDIA International esimene tegevusaasta kinnitas niisiis sektori huvi ja vajadusi rahvusvahelisel areenil ning ka vajadust ühenduse meetme järele.
The European Parliament renewed the preparatory action MEDIA International with an increased budget for 2009.
Euroopa Parlament pikendas ettevalmistava meetme MEDIA International rakendusaega ning suurendas 2009. aasta eelarvet.
On 19 May 2008, at an informal gathering in Cannes, ministers responsible for audiovisual matters from a number of Member States welcomed the European Parliament’s initiative on the preparatory action MEDIA International and encouraged the Commission ‘to pursue the development of this initiative and to examine the desirability and the possibility of presenting a proposal for a support programme to promote cooperation between European audiovisual industry professionals and industry professionals in third countries for the mutual benefit of all participants’.
Mitme liikmesriigi audiovisuaalvaldkonna eest vastutavad ministrid tervitasid 19. mail 2008. aastal Cannes’is toimunud mitteametlikul kohtumisel Euroopa Parlamendi algatust seoses ettevalmistava meetmega MEDIA International ning julgustasid komisjoni „seda algatust edasi arendama ning kaaluma, kuivõrd oleks soovitav ja võimalik teha enne aasta lõppu ettepanek toetusprogrammi koostamiseks, et edendada koostööd Euroopa ja kolmandate riikide audiovisuaalvaldkonna asjatundjate vahel kõigi osaliste huvides”.