natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On that basis, it was provisionally concluded that the imports of the Community industry of the product concerned from the PRC have not contributed to the material injury they suffered during the IP.
Eespool esitatu põhjal jõuti esialgsele järeldusele, et see asjaolu, et ühenduse tootmisharu importis Hiinast vaatlusalust toodet, ei aidanud kaasa ühenduse tootmisharu kantud olulise kahju tekkimisele uurimisperioodil.
Relocation of production by the Community industry
Ühenduse tootmisharu tootmistegevuse ümberpaigutamine
Certain interested parties attributed the losses of capacity utilisation and market share incurred by the Community industry to the fact that they have relocated part of their production to other Member States in the Community, in particular in 2006.
Teatavad huvitatud isikud avaldasid arvamust, et ühenduse tootmisharu tootmisvõimsust kasutati vähem ja tema turuosa vähenes, sest ühenduse tootmisharu paigutas (eelkõige aastal 2006) osa oma tootmistegevusest ümber teistesse ühenduse liikmesriikidesse.
Moreover, they attributed the decrease in sales prices to the conditions of competition prevailing in these Member States where there is allegedly more pressure on sales prices.
Lisaks sellele olid nad seisukohal, et müügihinnad langesid nendes liikmesriikides kehtivate konkurentsitingimuste tõttu, sest kõnealustes liikmesriikides avaldatakse müügihindadele väidetavalt rohkem survet.
The investigation showed that the production capacity of the Community, did not decrease, but steadily increased by 8 % during the period considered.
Uurimine näitas, et ühenduse tootmisvõimsuse kasutamine ei vähenenud, vaid pidevalt kasvas vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul (8 %).
In addition, it was found that the main increases in capacity were observed in the periods starting in 2006 and during the IP.
Lisaks sellele leiti, et tootmisvõimsus suurenes kõige rohkem ajavahemikkudel alates 2006. aastast ning uurimisperioodi jooksul.
Finally, it was also found that both the production and sales volume of the Community industry increased by 8 % between 2006 and the IP.
Samuti leiti, et nii ühenduse tootmisharu toodang kui ka müügimaht kasvas 8 % ajavahemikul 2006. aastast kuni uurimisperioodini.
Accordingly, the claim is contradicted by the findings of the investigation which showed that an increase in production capacity, production and stocks.
Sellest tulenevalt on väide vastuolus uurimise tulemustega, mille kohaselt tootmisvõimsus, toodang ja varud kasvasid.
As mentioned in recital (115) above, the loss in market share suffered by the Community industry was due to the fact that it could not fully benefit from the growth of the market that occurred in that period.
Nagu on märgitud põhjenduses 115, vähenes ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa seetõttu, et ta ei suutnud täielikult kasu saada sel perioodil suurenenud turust.
Furthermore, it was shown in recitals (122) to (124) above that the restructuring actions undertaken by the Community industry in particular in 2006 led to a substantial decrease of 14 % of its average COP in particular during the IP.
Lisaks sellele selgitati põhjendustes 122–124, et eelkõige aastal 2006 ühenduse tootmisharu tehtud ümberkorralduste tõttu vähenesid tema tootmiskulud (eriti uurimisperioodil) oluliselt (14 %).
There is no indication in the investigation that the Community industry significantly changed its mix of customers in the Community as alleged by the parties in question.
Uurimise käigus ei ilmnenud märke selle kohta, et ühenduse tootmisharu kliendivalik ühenduses oleks oluliselt muutnud, nagu väitsid asjaomased isikud.
Rather it is considered that the price pressure exerted by low price dumped imports from the PRC led to a low level of prices for candles on the Community market.
Selle asemel arvatakse, et küünalde hinnad ühenduse turul olid madalad Hiinast pärit madala dumpinguhinnaga impordist tuleneva hinnasurve tõttu.
On that basis, the investigation did not point to a link between the relocation of production undertaken by the Community industry and the material injury it suffered during the IP.
Sellest tulenevalt ei selgunud uuringu käigus, et ühenduse tootmisharu tootmistegevuse ümberpaigutamine ja ühenduse tootmisharu kantud oluline kahju uurimisperioodil on omavahel seotud.
Impact of the existence of a cartel among European paraffin wax producers
Euroopa parafiinitootjate kartelli mõju
Certain parties claimed that the injury suffered by the Community industry was caused by the price increase in the main raw material, namely paraffin which occurred on the Community market.
Mõned isikud väitsid, et ühenduse tootmisharu kantud kahju põhjustas peamise tooraine, s.o parafiini hinna tõus ühenduse turul.
More specifically, they referred to a statement of objection issued by the Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission (DG Competition) in which a cartel amongst European paraffin wax producers was alleged to exist up to the beginning of 2005.
Konkreetsemalt osutasid nad Euroopa Komisjoni konkurentsi peadirektoraadi esitatud vastuväitele, mille kohaselt tegutses kuni 2005. aasta alguseni Euroopas parafiinitootjate kartell.
Accordingly the parties asked the Commission to carefully examine the facts and follow any new developments in connexion with the impact of the cartel on the economic situation of the Community industry.
Sellest tulenevalt palusid huvitatud isikud komisjonil hoolikalt kontrollida fakte ja uusi arenguid seoses kartelli mõjuga ühenduse tootmisharu majanduslikule olukorrale.
The investigation showed that the increase in the paraffin price did not only affect the Community market but also other markets in the world as the evolution of paraffin, an oil derivative, is closely linked to the evolution of the oil price.
Uurimine näitas, et parafiini hinna tõus mõjutas nii ühenduse turgu kui ka teisi turge maailmas, sest parafiini hinna areng on tihedalt seotud nafta hinna arenguga, sest see on nafta derivaat.
Moreover as explained in recitals (122) to (124) above, the Community industry managed to control its costs during then IP.
Nagu on selgitatud põhjendustes 122–124, suutis ühenduse tootmisharu lisaks sellele kontrollida uurimisperioodil oma kulusid.
The paraffin price increase was countered by substituting paraffin with stearin.
Parafiini hinna tõusu tõttu asendati parafiin steariiniga.
The Community industry also rationalised its production and managed to significantly reduce its costs which during the IP were kept to levels comparable to 2004 and 2005.
Ühenduse tootmisharu ratsionaliseeris oma tootmist ning tal õnnestus oluliselt vähendada oma kulusid, mille tase uurimisperioodil oli sarnane 2004. ja 2005. aasta tasemega.
DG Competition has indeed conducted an investigation into the alleged existence of a cartel between certain producers of paraffin wax, the main raw material for the Community candle industry and officially issued its findings at the beginning of October 2008.
Konkurentsi peadirektoraat uuris väidet, mille kohaselt tegutses parafiinitootjate kartell (parafiin on ühenduse küünlatööstuse peamine tooraine) ning esitas oma ametlikud järeldused 2008. aasta oktoobri alguses.
A first analysis of these findings in relation to the current anti-dumping investigation indicates that the Community industry sourced approximately one third of its paraffin needs from companies participating in the cartel during the IP, namely in 2007.
Kõnealuste järelduste esialgne analüüs seoses praeguse dumpinguvastase uurimisega näitab, et ühenduse tootmisharu hankis umbes ühe kolmandiku parafiinist äriühingutelt, kes uurimisperioodil (nimelt aastal 2007) kartellis osalesid.
The data verified during that period shows that the average price of paraffin purchased from companies participating in the cartel is in the same range as prices of paraffin purchased from other suppliers in the Community.
Selle perioodi kohta käivad kontrollitud andmed näitavad, et kartellis osalevatelt äriühingutelt ostetud parafiini hind on sarnane teistelt ühenduse tarnijatelt ostetud parafiini hinnaga.
It is also worth noting that the prices of paraffin purchased by the Community industry were found to be in line with the prices of paraffin in the PRC, the only information available on non-EU prices at this stage of the investigation.
Tuleks ka märkida, et ühenduse tootmisharu ostetud parafiini hind oli sarnane Hiina parafiini hinnaga; uurimise selles etapis oli see ainuke teave, mida saadi muude kui ELi riikide hindade kohta.
DG Competition initiated its investigation early April 2005 and the period considered for the current investigation included slightly more than a year during which the cartel was found to exist.
Konkurentsi peadirektoraat algatas uurimise 2005. aasta aprilli alguses ning käesolev uurimine hõlmab veidi üle aasta pikkust ajavahemikku, mille jooksul kartell tegutses.
It could therefore be argued that the year 2004 is not suitable or representative for the analysis of injury and causal link on the grounds of the existence of a cartel in that year.
Seega võib väita, et 2004. aasta ei ole sobiv ega representatiivne, et analüüsida kahju ja selle põhjuslikke seoseid, sest sel aastal tegutses kartell.
Considering that it is not unreasonable to assume that the cartel ceased to exist when the investigation of DG Competition started, namely at the beginning of 2005, the trends concerning the economic situation of the Community industry, when the cartel was still existing, namely in 2004, and after when the cartel ceased to exist, namely in 2005, were compared.
Kuna on põhjust eeldada, et kartell lõpetas tegevuse ajal, mil konkurentsi peadirektoraat alustas uurimist, nimelt 2005. aasta alguses, võrreldi ühenduse tööstusharu majandusliku olukorra suundumusi ajal, kui kartell veel tegutses (s.t 2004. aastal) suundumustega ajal pärast kartelli tegevuse lõppemist (s.t 2005. aastal).
This comparison indicates that the trends concerning the injury picture of the Community industry remains approximately the same.
See võrdlus näitas, et suundumused ühenduse kantud kahju osas jäid ligikaudu samaks.
Taking into account the developments of the injury indicators between 2005 and the IP would therefore not alter the injury picture and the conclusions reached in recitals (130) to (134) above.
Asjaolu, et 2005. aastast kuni uurimisperioodini kantud kahju näitajate arengut võeti arvesse, ei muuda ühenduse tootmisharu olukorda kahju osas ega põhjendustes 130–134 tehtud järeldusi.
Accordingly, based on information which is currently available, it would appear that the increase in the raw material costs and the cartel could not have had a material impact on the economic situation of the Community industry which was examined in depth from 2004 up to the end of 2007.
Sellest tulenevalt ilmneb praegu kättesaadava teabe põhjal, et tooraine hinna tõusul ja kartelli tegevusel ei saanud olla olulist mõju ühenduse tootmisharu majanduslikule olukorrale, mida uuriti põhjalikult alates 2004. aastast kuni 2007. aasta lõpuni.
The possible impact the cartel may have had on the Community market will nevertheless be further investigated in the remainder of the investigation.
Sellest olenemata uuritakse ülejäänud uurimise käigus edasi kartelli tegevuse võimalikku mõju ühenduse turule.
The above analysis has demonstrated that there was a substantial increase in the volume and market share of the low-priced dumped imports originating in the PRC between 2004 and the IP.
Eespool esitatud analüüs näitas, et Hiinast pärit madala dumpinguhinnaga impordi maht ja turuosa suurenesid oluliselt 2004. aastast kuni uurimisperioodini.
In addition, it was found that these imports were made at significantly dumped prices which were far below the prices charged by the Community industry on the Community market for similar product types.
Lisaks sellele leiti, et selline import toimus märkimisväärselt madalate dumpinguhindadega, mis olid palju madalamad kui ühenduse tootmisharu hinnad ühenduse turul samasuguste tooteliikide puhul.
This increase in volume and market share of the low-priced dumped imports from the PRC coincided with an overall increase of the demand in the Community but also with the negative development of sales prices, a significant drop in the market share of the Community industry and a deterioration of the main indicators pertaining to its economic situation during the IP.
Selline madala dumpinguhinnaga Hiinast pärit impordi mahu ja turuosa suurenemine toimus samal ajal, kui ühenduses üldiselt nõudlus suurenes, müügihinnad langesid, ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa vähenes oluliselt ning halvenesid ühenduse tootmisharu peamised majandusnäitajad uurimisperioodil.
The Community industry made substantial losses in 2006 and remained loss-making during the IP.
Ühenduse tootmisharu kandis olulist kahju 2006. aastal ning kandis kahju ka uurimisperioodil.
The examination of the other known factors which could have caused injury to the Community industry revealed that none of these could have had a significant negative impact on that industry in particular during the IP.
Uuriti muid teadaolevaid tegureid, mis oleks võinud ühenduse tootmisharu kantud kahju põhjustada, kuid leiti, et ühelgi neist ei saanud olla tootmisharule olulist negatiivset mõju, eriti uurimisperioodi jooksul.
Based on the above analysis, which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Community industry from the injurious effects of the dumped imports, it is provisionally concluded that the imports from the PRC have caused material injury to the Community industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Eespool esitatud analüüsi põhjal, mille käigus eristati nõuetekohaselt kõigi teadaolevalt ühenduse tootmisharu olukorda mõjutanud tegurite toime dumpinguhinnaga impordi kahjulikust mõjust, tehakse esialgne järeldus, et Hiinast pärit import on tekitanud ühenduse tootmisharule olulist kahju algmääruse artikli 3 lõike 6 tähenduses.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether, despite the conclusion on injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed for concluding that it is not in the Community interest to adopt provisional anti-dumping measures in this particular case.
Algmääruse artikli 21 kohaselt uuriti, kas olenemata järeldusest kahjuliku dumpingu kohta, on kaalukaid põhjuseid, millest tulenevalt ei oleks ajutiste dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtestamine käesoleval juhul ühenduse huvides.
The analysis of the Community interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, including those of the Community industry, the raw material suppliers, the importers and the consumers of the product concerned.
Ühenduse huvide analüüs põhines kõigi erinevate huvide, sealhulgas ühenduse tootmisharu, toorainetarnijate, importijate ja vaatlusaluse toote tarbijate huvide hindamisel.
The Community industry is composed of numerous small and medium size producers located throughout the Community, employing directly around 5000 people and sourcing most of its raw material needs from Community suppliers.
Ühenduse tootmisharu koosneb mitmest ühenduses asuvast väikesest ja keskmise suurusega tootjast, kes annavad tööd ligikaudu 5000 inimesele ja kes hangivad enamiku oma toorainest ühenduse tarnijatelt.
This means that there are many companies in the Community which depend on this industry.
See tähendab, et ühenduses on mitu äriühingut, kes sõltuvad kõnealusest tootmisharust.
This broadens the economic implication of the candle industry and in particular its impact on the employment in the Community.
See laiendab küünlatööstuse majanduslikku mõju, eelkõige mõju ühenduse tööhõivele.
The Community industry has continued to make efforts to raise capital and to invest in modernisation and automation of production processes in order to remain competitive.
Ühendus on teinud jätkuvalt jõupingutusi kapitali kaasamiseks ja investeerimiseks tootmisprotsesside ajakohastamisse ja automatiseerimisse, et säilitada konkurentsivõimet.
It was also observed that considerable efforts were made to restructure production, and to reduce costs.
Märgati ka, et olulisi jõupingutusi on tehtud tootmise ümberkorraldamiseks ja kulude vähendamiseks.
This shows that the industry is viable and not ready to abandon production.
See näitab, et tootmisharu on elujõuline ning ei ole valmis tootmist lõpetama.
It is considered that the non-imposition of provisional anti-dumping measures would lead to a further deterioration of the economic situation of the Community industry, thus undermining the efforts, in particular the investments, made in recent years.
Leitakse, et kui ajutisi dumpinguvastaseid meetmeid ei võeta, halveneb ühenduse tootmisharu majanduslik olukord veelgi, kahjustades seega viimastel aastatel tehtud jõupingutusi, eriti investeeringute mõju.
In the short term this would imply company closures, not only in the candle but also likely in the upstream industry and subsequent job losses in the Community.
Lühemas perspektiivis tähendaks see äriühingute sulgemist, mitte ainult küünlatööstuses, vaid tõenäoliselt ka varustavas tööstuses, ning selle tulemusena kaoks veelgi enam töökohti.
It is expected that following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties, the price level of candles in the Community market would increase and would allow for a restoration of profitability of the Community industry.
Eeldatavalt tõusevad küünalde hinnad ühenduse turul pärast ajutiste dumpinguvastaste tollimaksude kehtestamist ning tänu sellele oleks võimalik taastada ühenduse tootmisharu kasumlikkus.
A price increase of 7 % would be sufficient to allow this industry to quickly reach an acceptable level of profitability.
7 % hinnatõus oleks piisav, et kõnealune tootmisharu saavutaks kiiresti rahuldaval tasemel kasumlikkuse.
In addition, the proposed measures will very likely put the Community industry in the position to regain at least part of the market share lost during the period considered with a further positive impact on its economic situation and profitability.
Lisaks sellele oleks ühenduse tootmisharul tänu kavandatavatele meetmetele tõenäoliselt võimalik tagasi saada vähemalt osa vaatlusalusel perioodil kaotatud turuosast ning sellel oleks positiivne lisamõju tema majanduslikule olukorrale ja kasumlikkusele.
A total of six replies to the importers' questionnaire were received, of which only two could be considered to be meaningful for the purpose of the Community interest analysis.
Importijatele saadetud küsimustikule saadi kuus vastust, millest ainult kahel on ühenduse huvide analüüsi seisukohast tähtsust.
The two importers that submitted meaningful replies and cooperated in the investigation were against the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Kaks importijat, kes esitasid küsimustikule arvessevõetavaid vastuseid ning tegid uurimise käigus koostööd, olid dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtestamise vastu.
These importers accounted for around 3 % of the total imports of candles from the PRC into the Community and 1 % of the Community consumption of candles during the IP.
Nende importijate osa Hiinast pärit küünalde koguimpordist ühendusse uurimisperioodi jooksul oli 3 % ja ühenduse küünalde tarbimisest 1 %.
The turnover concerning the trade of candles corresponds to 3,4 % of the companies' activity.
Küünalde müügist tulenev käive vastab 3,4 % äriühingute tegevusest.
It was found that the gross margin realised by these importers on candles purchased from the PRC during the IP was between 15 to 25 % during the IP as they are mainly selling to distributors on the Community market.
Leiti, et nende importijate Hiinast uurimisperioodil ostetud küünalde realiseeritud brutomarginaal oli uurimisperioodil 15 %–25 %, kuna nad müüvad peamiselt ühenduse turul tegutsevatele turustajatele.
The direct impact of the introduction of provisional anti-dumping measures may thus not be negligible for these two cooperating importers if they cannot pass on the possible impact of measures to their customers.
Ajutiste dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtestamise otsene mõju neile kahele koostööd tegevale importijale ei pruugi seega osutuda tühiseks, kui neil ei õnnestu jätta meetmete võimalikku mõju oma klientide kanda.
The investigation showed that the prices for candles to large customers such as distributors were relatively depressed during the IP but that retailers were achieving comfortable gross margins even on the retail of basic products.
Uurimine näitas, et suurtele klientidele, nagu turustajad, müüdud küünalde hinnad olid uurimisperioodil suhteliselt madalad, kuid jaemüüjad saavutasid isegi põhitoodete jaemüügi põhjal piisava brutomarginaali.
On that basis, it is considered that at least part or any purchase price increase due to anti-dumping measures could be passed on the various step of the distribution chain up to the level of retailers.
Selle alusel leitakse, et dumpinguvastastest meetmetest tulenev ostuhinna tõus, või vähemalt osa sellest, on võimalik turustusketi erinevate lülide kaudu suunata jaemüüjate tasandile.
In view of the small share the candle business represents on the turnover of the co-operating importers, i.e. only 3,4 %, and the likelihood that the importers would be able to pass at least part of any price increases further down the distribution chain, it is provisionally considered that the impact of the provisional measures on their financial situation will not be significant.
Võttes arvesse, et küünalde müügi osa koostööd tegevate importijate käibest on väike (ainult 3,4 %) ja tõenäosust, et importijad saavad vähemalt osa hinnatõusust varustusahelas edasi anda, järeldatakse esialgu, et ajutistel meetmetel ei ole nende finantsolukorrale olulist mõju.
Large retail groups, which imported large quantities of candles, during the IP, either did not offer to cooperate or submitted replies which were not meaningful for the analysis of the Community interest.
Suured jaeühendused, kes importisid uurimisperioodil küünlaid suures koguses, ei teinud koostööd või ei esitanud küsimustikule ühenduse huvide analüüsi seisukohalt olulisi vastuseid.
It has therefore not been possible to accurately assess the full impact of the proposed anti-dumping measures on the profitability of these groups based on verified data.
Seega ei olnud kontrollitud andmete põhjal võimalik täpselt hinnata kavandatavate dumpinguvastaste meetmete täielikku mõju nende rühmituste tasuvusele.
However, despite the lack of cooperation from these parties, the Commission searched publicly available information regarding the retail prices of candles and, in particular, for tea lights and made an assessment concerning the possible impact of the provisional anti-dumping measurers may have on retailers.
Olenemata sellest, et kõnealused isikud ei teinud koostööd, otsis komisjon avalikkusele kättesaadavat teavet küünalde, eelkõige teeküünalde, hindade kohta, ning hindas dumpinguvastaste meetmete võimalikku mõju jaemüüjatele.
Tea lights covered up a large share of both the exports from the PRC and the Community industry’s sales during the IP.
Teeküünalde osa oli uurimisperioodil suur nii Hiinast tulevas ekspordis kui ka ühenduse tootmisharu müügis.
Subsequently, the average duty payable on imports of candles imported from the PRC as well as the possible price increase for tea lights produced by the Community industry were compared.
Hiljem võrreldi Hiinast pärit küünalde impordilt makstud keskmist tollimaksu ja ühenduse tootmisharu toodetud teeküünalde võimalikku hinnatõusu.
Based on public information, it was found that large retailers are achieving comfortable gross profit margins of several hundred percent in their candle business.
Avalikkusele kättesaadava teabe põhjal leiti, et suured jaemüüjad saavutasid küünlamüügi osas piisava mitmesaja protsendi suuruse kasumi brutomarginaali.
In practical terms, this means that for a pack of basic candles sold at an indexed retail price of 100 to consumers the gross margin of retailers could be as high as an index of 70.
Tegelikult tähendab see, et kui tarbijale müüakse pakk tavalisi küünlaid indekseeritud jaemüügihinnaga 100, võib jaemüüjate indekseeritud brutomarginaal olla kuni 70.