natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
National language official translation of the above EN_name_value.
eespool esitatud „EN_name_value” riigikeelne ametlik tõlge.
The scheme name is required to uniquely identify, by name, the scheme referred to by the Scheme information URI, and also to ensure that in case a scheme operator operates more than one scheme, there is a distinct name given to each of them.
Süsteemi nimi on nõutav üksnes selleks, et tuvastada nime järgi Scheme information URI väljal viidatud süsteem ning tagada, et juhul, kui süsteemioperaator opereerib rohkem kui ühte kava, siis on igaühele neist antud erinev nimi.
Member States and Scheme operators SHALL make sure that when a Member State or a Scheme Operator operates more than one scheme, there is a distinct name given to each of them.
Liikmesriigid ja süsteemioperaatorid PEAVAD tagama, et kui liikmesriik või süsteemioperaator opereerib rohkem kui ühte kava, siis on igaühele neist antud erinev nimi.
Scheme information URI (clause 5.3.7)
Scheme information URI (punkt 5.3.7)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the URI(s) where users (relying parties) can obtain scheme-specific information (with EN as the mandatory language and with potentially one or more national languages).
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK ning sellel PEAVAD olema esitatud URI(d), kust kasutajad (sõltuvad osapooled) võivad saada teavet süsteemi kohta (kus EN on kohustuslik keel, millele lisandub võimaluse korral üks või enam riigikeelt).
This SHALL be a sequence of multilingual pointers (with EN as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages).
See PEAB olema mitmekeelsete viitade jada (kus EN on kohustuslik keel, millele lisandub võimaluse korral üks või enam riigikeelt).
The referenced URI(s) MUST provide a path to information describing ‘appropriate information about the scheme’.
Viidatud URI(d) PEAVAD viima teabeallikani, kust leida asjakohast teavet skeemi kohta (appropriate information about the scheme).
The appropriate information about the scheme SHALL include as a minimum:
Asjakohane teave skeemi kohta PEAB sisaldama vähemalt järgmist:
General introductory information that would be common to all Member States with regard to the scope and context of the Trusted List, and the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s).
kõigi liikmesriikide puhul ühtset tutvustavat üldteavet usaldusnimekirja ulatuse ja tausta ning selle aluseks oleva(te) järelevalve-/akrediteerimisüsteemi(de) kohta.
The common text to be used is as follows:
Ühtne tekst, mida tuleb kasutada, on järgmine:
‘The present list is the TSL implementation of [name of the relevant Member State] “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
„The present list is the TSL implementation of [name of the relevant Member State] „Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
The Trusted List of a Member State provides a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3,3, 3.2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
The Trusted List of a Member State provides a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3.3, 3,2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List and the present TSL implementation at a national level on a voluntary basis.’
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List and the present TSL implementation at a national level on a voluntary basis.”
Specific information on the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s), in particular [16]: Information on the supervision system applicable to any CSPQC;
teavet usaldusnimekirja aluseks oleva(te) järelevalve-/akrediteerimisüsteemi(de) kohta, eelkõige [16]:teave kõigi CSPQC-de suhtes kohaldatava järelevalvesüsteemi kohta;
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSPQC;
vajaduse korral teave kõigi CSPQC-de suhtes kohaldatava siseriikliku vabatahtlikkusel põhineva akrediteerimise süsteemi kohta;
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs;
vajaduse korral teave kõigi QCsid mitteväljastavate CSPde suhtes kohaldatava siseriikliku vabatahtlikkusel põhineva akrediteerimise süsteemi kohta;
This specific information SHALL include, at least, for each underlying scheme listed above:
see teave PEAB sisaldama iga eespool loetletud süsteemi kohta vähemalt järgmist:
General description;
üldist kirjeldust;
Information about the process followed by the Supervisory/Accreditation Body to supervise/accredit CSPs and by the CSPs for being supervised/accredited;
teavet protsessi kohta, mida järgib järelevalve-/akrediteerimisasutus CSPde järelevalve/akrediteerimise korral ja mida järgivad CSPd nende järelevalve/akrediteerimise korral;
Information about the criteria against which CSPs are supervised/accredited.
teavet kriteeriumide kohta, mille alusel CSPde järelevalvet teostatakse / neid akrediteeritakse;
Specific information, when applicable, on the specific qualifications some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level including the meaning of such a qualification and the associated national provisions and requirements.
vajaduse korral teavet mõne sertifitseerimisteenuse osutamise tulemusel tekkiva või väljastatava füüsilise või binaarse (loogilise) objekti erikvalifikatsioonide kohta, mis on antud, lähtudes nende vastavusest siseriiklikult kehtestatud normide ja nõuetega, mis hõlmab ka sellise kvalifikatsiooni ja sellega seotud siseriiklike normide ja nõuete tähendust.
Additional Member State specific information about the scheme MAY additionally be provided on a voluntary basis.
Liikmesriik VÕIB vabatahtlikult esitada täiendavat teavet oma süsteemi kohta. See teave PEAB sisaldama järgmist:
Other contact and general information that applies to the scheme operation.
muud kontakt- ja üldteavet süsteemi toimimise kohta.
Status determination approach (clause 5.3.8)
Status determination approach (punkt 5.3.8)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the identifier of the status determination approach.
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK ning sellel PEAB olema esitatud oleku määramise viisi identifikaator.
The following specific URI SHALL be used, as registered and described as follows:
Selleks PEAB kasutama konkreetset URIt, mille aadress ja kirjeldus on järgmised:
Description Services listed have their status determined by or on behalf of the Scheme Operator under an appropriate system for a referenced Member State that allows for ‘supervision’ (and, when applicable, for ‘voluntary accreditation’) of certification service providers who are established on its territory (or established in a third country in the case of ‘voluntary accreditation’) and issue qualified certificates to the public according to Art. 3,3 (respectively Art. 3,2 or Art. 7.1(a)) of the Directive 1999/93/EC, and, when applicable, that allows for the ‘supervision’/‘voluntary accreditation’ of certification service providers not issuing qualified certificates, according to a nationally defined and established recognised ‘approval scheme(s)’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance of services from CSPs not issuing QCs with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and potentially extended by national provisions with regard to the provision of such certification services.
Kirjeldus nimekirja kantud teenuste oleku määrab süsteemioperaator või tema esindaja asjakohase süsteemi alusel, mida kohaldatakse viidatud liikmesriigis, kes lubab teostada oma territooriumil asutatud (või vabatahtlikkusel põhineva akrediteerimise puhul kolmandas riigis asutatud) ja vastavalt direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ artikli 3 lõikele 3 (vastavalt artikli 3 lõikele 2 või artikli 7 lõike 1 punktile a) üldsusele kvalifitseeritud sertifikaate väljastatavate sertifitseerimisteenuse osutajate järelevalvet (ja vajaduse korral vabatahtlikkusel põhinevat akrediteerimist) ja kes lubab vajaduse korral teostada järelevalvet / vabatahtlikkusel põhinevat akrediteerimist kvalifitseeritud sertifikaate mitteväljastavate sertifitseerimisteenuse osutajate suhtes vastavalt riiklikult määratletud ja kehtestatud tunnustatud heakskiitmissüsteemi(de)le, mida rakendatakse siseriiklikel alustel, et kontrollida QCsid mitteväljastavate CSPde poolt osutatavate teenuste vastavust direktiivi 1999/93/EÜ sätetega ja võimaluse korral laiemalt selliste sertifitseerimisteenuste suhtes kohaldatavate siseriiklike sätetega.
Scheme type/community/rules (clause 5.3.9)
Scheme type/community/rules (punkt 5.3.9)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL contain at least the following registered URIs:
See väli on KOHUSTUSLIK ning sellel PEAVAD sisalduma vähemalt järgmised registreeritud URId:
A URI common to all Member States' Trusted Lists pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to all TLs:
kõigi liikmesriikide usaldusnimekirjade jaoks ühine URI, mis viitab kirjeldavale tekstile, mida PEAB kasutama kõigi usaldusnimekirjade puhul:
By which participation is denoted of the Member State’s scheme (identified via the TSL type (clause 5.3,3) and Scheme name (clause 5.3.6)) in a scheme of schemes (i.e. a TSL listing pointers to all Member States publishing and maintaining a TL in the form of a TSL);
millega väljendatakse liikmesriigi süsteemi osalemist (tuvastatav TSL type välja (punkt 5.3.3) ja Scheme name välja (punkt 5.3.6) kaudu) üldises süsteemis (st TSL nimekirjade viited kõigile liikmesriikidele, kes avaldavad ja haldavad TLi TSLi kujul);
Where users can obtain policy/rules against which services included in the list SHALL be assessed and from which the type of the TSL (see clause 5.3.3) can be determined;
kust kasutajad pääsevad ligi põhimõtetele/eeskirjadele, mille suhtes PEAB nimekirja kantud teenuseid hindama ja mille alusel võib määratleda TSLi tüüpi (vt punkt 5.3.3);
Where users can obtain description about how to use and interpret the content of the TSL implementation of the Trusted List.
kust kasutajad leiavad kirjelduse, kuidas kasutada ja tõlgendada usaldusnimekirja TSL rakenduse sisu.
These usage rules SHALL be common to all Member States' Trusted Lists whatever the type of listed service and whatever the supervision/accreditation system(s) is (are).
Need kasutuseeskirjad PEAVAD olema ühtsed kõigi liikmesriikide usaldusnimekirjade puhul, olenemata nimekirja kantud teenuse tüübist ja järelevalve-/akrediteerimissüsteemi(de)st.
Descriptive text:
Kirjeldav tekst:
‘Participation in a scheme
„Participation in a scheme
Each Member State must create a “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
Each Member State must create a „Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
The applicable “supervision” system (respectively “voluntary accreditation” system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11).
The applicable „supervision” system (respectively „voluntary accreditation” system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a “voluntary accreditation” system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined “recognised approval scheme” implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a „voluntary accreditation” system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined „recognised approval scheme” implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive).
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific “qualification” on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a “qualification” is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific „qualification” on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a „qualification” is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
indicates that from the “Service digital identifier” (Sdi) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the “Sdi” identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate ETSI TS 101 862 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcC, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI TS 101 456 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
indicates that from the „Service digital identifier” (Sdi) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the „Sdi” identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate ETSI TS 101 862 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcC, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI TS 101 456 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
Note: if no “Sie”“Qualification” information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not “further identified” through a related Sie entry, then the “machine-processable” information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
Note: if no „Sie”„Qualification” information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not „further identified” through a related Sie entry, then the „machine-processable” information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
and IF“Sie”“Qualification” information is present, then in addition to the above default usage interpretation rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of this Sie Qualification entry, which is constructed on the principle of a sequence of “filters” further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing some additional information regarding SSCD support and/or “Legal person as subject” (e.g. those certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific “Key usage” pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
and IF„Sie”„Qualification” information is present, then in addition to the above default usage interpretation rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of this Sie Qualification entry, which is constructed on the principle of a sequence of „filters” further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing some additional information regarding SSCD support and/or „Legal person as subject” (e.g. those certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific „Key usage” pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
Those qualifiers are part of the following set of “qualifiers” used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding QC content, and that are used respectively:
Those qualifiers are part of the following set of „qualifiers” used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding QC content, and that are used respectively:
“QCWithSSCD” qualifier value meaning “QC supported by an SSCD”, or
„QCWithSSCD” qualifier value meaning „QC supported by an SSCD”, or
“QCNoSSCD” qualifier value meaning “QC not supported by an SSCD”, or
„QCNoSSCD” qualifier value meaning „QC not supported by an SSCD”, or
“QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the “Sdi”-“Sie” provided information in this CA/QC entry;
„QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the „Sdi”-„Sie” provided information in this CA/QC entry;
“QCForLegalPerson” qualifier value meaning “Certificate issued to a Legal Person”
„QCForLegalPerson” qualifier value meaning „Certificate issued to a Legal Person”
The general interpretation rule for any other “Sti” type entry is that the listed service named according to the “Sn” field value and uniquely identified by the “Sdi” field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the “Scs” field value as from the date indicated in the “Current status starting date and time”.
The general interpretation rule for any other „Sti” type entry is that the listed service named according to the „Sn” field value and uniquely identified by the „Sdi” field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the „Scs” field value as from the date indicated in the „Current status starting date and time”.
Specific interpretation rules for any additional information with regard to a listed service (e.g. “Service information extensions” field) may be found, when applicable, in the Member State specific URI as part of the present “Scheme type/community/rules” field.
Specific interpretation rules for any additional information with regard to a listed service (e.g. „Service information extensions” field) may be found, when applicable, in the Member State specific URI as part of the present „Scheme type/community/rules” field.
Please refer to the Technical specifications for a Common Template for the “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” in the Annex of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC for further details on the fields, description and meaning for the TSL implementation of the Member States' Trusted Lists.’
Please refer to the Technical specifications for a Common Template for the „Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” in the Annex of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC for further details on the fields, description and meaning for the TSL implementation of the Member States' Trusted Lists.”
A URI specific to each Member State’s Trusted List pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to this Member State TL:
Iga liikmesriigi usaldusnimekirja URI, mis viitab kirjeldavale tekstile, mida PEAB kohaldama selle liikmesriigi TLi suhtes:
where CC = the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 Country Code used in the ‘Scheme territory’ field (clause 5.3.10)
kus CC = standardile ISO 3166-1 vastav kahetäheline riigikood, mida kasutatakse Scheme territory väljal (punkt 5.3.10),
Where users can obtain the referenced Member State’s specific policy/rules against which services included in the list SHALL be assessed in compliance with the Member State’s appropriate supervision system and voluntary accreditation schemes.
kust kasutajad pääsevad ligi põhimõtetele/eeskirjadele, mille suhtes PEAB nimekirja kantud teenuseid hindama vastavalt liikmesriigi asjaomastele järelevalvesüsteemile ja vabatahtlikkusel põhinevatele akrediteerimissüsteemidele;
Where users can obtain a referenced Member State’s specific description about how to use and interpret the content of the TSL implementation of the Trusted List with regard to the certification services not related to the issuing of QCs.
kust kasutajad võivad leida asjaomase liikmesriigi kirjelduse selle kohta, kuidas kasutada ja tõlgendada usaldusnimekirja TSL rakenduse sisu QCde väljastamisega mitteseotud sertifitseerimisteenuste puhul.
This may be used to indicate a potential granularity in the national supervision/accreditation systems related to CSPs not issuing QCs and how the ‘Scheme service definition URI’ (clause 5.5.6) and the ‘Service information extension’ field are used for this purpose.
Seda võib kasutada selleks, et viidata QCsid mitteväljastavate CSPdega seotud siseriiklike järelevalve-/akrediteerimissüsteemide võimalikule detailsusele ja sellele, kuidas kasutada Scheme service definition URI (punkt 5.5.6) ja Service information extension välju sellel eesmärgil.
Member States MAY define additional URIs from the above Member State specific URI (i.e. URIs defined from this hierarchical specific URI).
Liikmesriigid VÕIVAD määratleda täiendavaid URIsid lisaks eespool nimetatud liikmesriigi URI-le (st URId, mis on eristatavad sellest hierarhilisest URIst).
Scheme territory (clause 5.3.10)
Scheme territory (punkt 5.3.10)
In the context of the present specifications, this field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the country in which the scheme is established (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code).
Käesoleva kirjelduse kohaldamisel on see väli KOHUSTUSLIK ja selles PEAB olema näidatud, millises riigis on see süsteem kehtestatud (standardile ISO 3166-1 vastav kahetäheline riigikood).