natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was found that the negative development of EC sales by the Community industry ties in with the overall decrease in consumption.
Selgus, et ühenduse tootmisharu müügi negatiivsed arengud ELi turul on seotud tarbimise üldise vähenemisega.
It can therefore be concluded that the overall decrease of consumption has contributed to the injury suffered by the Community Industry.
Seetõttu võib järeldada, et tarbimise üldine vähenemine on mõjutanud ka ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju.
Special levies
Erilõivud
In many Member States, the sales of CD-Rs (as well as other recordable media) are taxed by way of a special levy included in the price when purchased at the retail level.
Paljudes liikmesriikides on CD-R-dele (nagu ka muudele salvestatavatele andmekandjatele) erilõivuna kehtestatud maks, mis sisaldub jaemüügihinnas.
It has been claimed that this special levy has contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
On väidetud, et see erilõiv on tekitanud ühenduse tootmisharule kahju.
This special levy is however collected on an equal basis on sales of imported CD-Rs as well as CD-Rs manufactured in the Community, thus being neutral between imported products and Community-manufactured products.
Samas kogutakse seda erilõivu võrdselt nii imporditud CD-R-de müügilt kui ka ühenduses toodetud CD-R-de müügilt, seega ei tehta vahet imporditud toodete ja ühenduse toodangu vahel.
However, the level of this special levy differs significantly between Member States, varying from no levy at all in countries such as the United Kingdom and Luxembourg to EUR 0,52/unit in France and EUR 0,29/unit in Italy.
Siiski on selle erilõivu suurus liikmesriikides erinev, varieerudes lõivu puudumisest niisugustes riikides nagu Ühendkuningriik ja Luksemburg kuni 0,52 euroni ühiku kohta Prantsusmaal ja 0,29 euroni ühiku kohta Itaalias.
This should be set against the average import price (at DDP) of EUR 0,12/unit when imported from India as well as from the PRC during the period considered.
Seda tuleks võrrelda India impordi keskmiselt 0,12-eurose hinnaga ühiku kohta (DDP-s) ja ka Hiina Rahvavabariigist saabuva impordi hinnaga vaatlusalusel perioodil.
Given the free movement of goods between Member States, this has allegedly led to a significant trade diversion to the detriment of the retailers located Member States with a high levy.
Kaupade vaba liikumine liikmesriikide vahel on väidetavalt kaasa toonud märkimisväärseid kaubanduse kõrvalekaldeid kõrgemate lõivudega riikides asuvate jaemüüjate kahjuks.
Indeed, sales of CD-Rs, according to sales statistics from Community manufacturers, confirm the fact that sales to retailers/e-shops located in low-levy Member States are significant and appear to include significant border-trade.
Tegelikult kinnitab ühenduse tootjatelt saadud statistika CD-R-de müügi kohta tõsiasja, et müük madalate lõivudega liikmesriikides asuvatele jaemüüjatele/e-poodidele ja ilmselt ka piirikaubanduse maht on märkimisväärne.
Given that the Community industry is located in Member States with the highest levy, it has been alleged by some interested parties that the injury suffered by the Community industry has been caused by the negative effect on consumption that this levy has brought, assuming that the Community industry has not been able to compensate for this loss by gains in sales in other Member States.
Arvestades, et ühenduse tootmisharu asub kõige kõrgemate lõivudega liikmesriikides, on mõned huvitatud osapooled väitnud, et ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju on põhjustatud selle lõivu negatiivsest mõjust tarbimisele, eeldades, et ühenduse tootmisharu pole teistes liikmesriikides saadud müügituluga seda kaotust kompenseerinud.
It is noted that one of the complaining Community producers which was subsequently excluded from the definition thereof, in March 2005, has questioned the legality of these levies itself and indeed claimed that the levy has caused the sales price to ‘collapse’.
Tuleb märkida, et üks kaebuse esitanud ühenduse tootjatest, kes hiljem sellest määratlusest välja jäeti, on seadnud kahtluse alla nende lõivude seaduslikkuse ning tõepoolest väitnud, et lõiv on põhjustanud hinnalangust.
Thus, this confirms that the levies had an effect on the Community producers’ sales.
Seega on tõestatud, et need lõivud mõjutavad ühenduse tootjate müügitulemusi.
It follows from recital (65) that the consumption of CD-Rs in the Community has decreased by 3 % during the period considered.
Põhjendusest 65 nähtub, et CD-R-de tarbimine on vaatlusalusel perioodil 3 % kahanenud.
Meanwhile, it is recalled that in recital (88), it was stated that the negative sales development of the Community industry coincides with the overall negative development of Community consumption.
Samas tuleb meenutada põhjenduses 88 nenditut, et ühenduse tootmisharu negatiivsed müüginäitajad on seotud üldise negatiivse arenguga ühenduse tarbimises.
Thus, whereas it cannot be stated that the special levy has had a specific and measurable impact on the overall Community sales (i.e. in addition to its effect on the overall development of Community consumption), it cannot be excluded that the special levy has had a negative impact on consumption, particularly in those Member States where this levy makes up a significant part of the retail price.
Seega, kuigi ei saa väita, et erilõivudel on konkreetne ja mõõdetav mõju ühenduse üldistele müügimahtudele (st lisaks sellele mõjule, mida ta avaldab ühenduse tarbimismahtudele), ei saa välistada, et erilõivud on avaldanud tarbimisele negatiivset mõju, eriti nendes riikides, kus see lõiv moodustab märkimisväärse osa jaemüügihinnast.
It has been alleged that the injury suffered by the Community industry is due to the royalties payable to the licence holder, Royal Philips Electronics Corporation, per unit produced, since this leads to a cost increase with which the imported products are allegedly not burdened and which could not been passed on to the customers.
On väidetud, et ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju on seotud litsentsiomanikule Royal Philips Electronics Corporationile makstava litsentsitasule ühikute pealt, kuna see toob kaasa kulude suurenemise, mis imporditavaid tooteid väidetavalt ei koorma ning mida ei saa tarbijatele edasi kanda.
The technique to produce CD-Rs is patented.
CD-R-de tootmistehnoloogia on patenteeritud.
The patent-holders are Sony Corporation, Taiyo Yuden and Royal Philips Electronics Corporations.
Patendiomanikud on Sony Corporation, Taiyo Yuden ja Royal Philips Electronics Corporations.
The latter is authorized by the former two companies to grant licenses (‘CD-R Disc Patent License Agreement (Joint)’) and to collect royalties due from any licensing agreement.
Viimane on saanud kahelt ülejäänud ettevõttelt volituse litsentside jagamiseks (“CD-R ketta patendilitsentsi (ühine) leping”CD-R Disc Patent License Agreement (Joint)) ning litsentsitasude kogumiseks kõikvõimalikelt litsentsilepingutelt.
The cost of royalties would typically be around 5 EUR-cents per unit produced (USD 0,06).
Litsentsitasu on tavaliselt 5 eurosenti (0,06 USA dollarit) tooteühikult.
It should be noted that the cost of royalty payable indeed appears significant as compared to an average sales price during the investigation period, i.e. 30 %.
Tuleb märkida, et litsentsitasu suurus on võrreldes keskmiste müügihindadega uurimisperioodi jooksul tõepoolest märkimisväärne, st 30 %.
However, the investigation revealed, that although the Community industry had signed a licensing agreement with Philips, it had apparently refused to pay royalties to Philips at the level set in the licensing agreement.
Siiski selgus uurimisest, et kuigi ühenduse tootmisharu on allkirjastanud litsentsilepingu Philipsiga, on ta ilmselt keeldunud maksmast Philipsile litsentsilepingus kehtestatud ulatuses litsentsitasu.
To this end, the Community industry was member of the Federation of Interested Parties in fair Competition in the Optical Media sector (‘FIPCOM’) which has in February 2006 reached an agreement with Royal Philips Electronics Corporations to pay a new lower rate of royalties.
Ühenduse tootmisharu kuulub optilise meedia ausat konkurentsi taotlevate isikute föderatsiooni (Federation of Interested Parties in fair Competition in the Optical Media sector, FIPCOM), mis jõudis 2006. aasta veebruaris Royal Philips Electronics Corporationsiga kokkuleppele madalamas litsentsitasus.
Still, it is noted that the Community industry has not yet paid (as of May 2006) the royalties due.
Siiski märgitakse, et ühenduse tootmisharu ei ole seni (2006. a mai seisuga) litsentsitasu maksnud.
To conclude, it appeared that, should the Community industry had paid the royalties payable in accordance with the licensing agreement signed by it, this may well had contributed to the negative financial performance, assuming that it would not have been able to pass on these costs to its customers.
Kokkuvõtteks: ilmnes, et kui ühenduse tootmisharu oleks maksnud allkirjastatud litsentsilepingus ette nähtud litsentsitasu, oleks see võinud olla negatiivsete finantstulemuste üks põhjusi, eeldades et neid kulusid poleks olnud võimalik tarbijatele edasi suunata.
However, since the Community industry was found not to pay, consequently royalties could not have played a part in the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Kuna aga selgus, et ühenduse tootmisharu ei maksa, ei saanud litsentsitasu ühenduse tootmisharule kahju tekitada.
Conclusion on Causation
Põhjusliku seose kokkuvõte
It was established above that there is a link between dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Ülalpool tuvastati, et dumpinguhinnaga import ja ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju on omavahel seotud.
It has also been concluded above that the injury suffered by the Community industry may, to a significant extent, be attributed to imports from other third countries (especially imports from India) and to the overall decrease of EC consumption.
Samuti on eespool jõutud järeldusele, et ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju võib märkimisväärses ulatuses olla seotud muudest kolmandatest riikidest (eriti Indiast) saabuva impordiga ning EÜ tarbimise üldise vähenemisega.
These reasons appear not to be able to break the causal link between dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Community industry, but have significantly contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry, thus severely weakening the causal link established above between the dumped imports and the injurious situation of the Community industry.
Need põhjused ei kaota tõenäoliselt dumpinguhinnaga impordi ja ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju põhjuslikku seost, aga need on ühenduse tootmisharule kahju tekkimist oluliselt mõjutanud, nõrgendades seega tuntavalt ülalpool välja selgitatud seost dumpinguhinnaga impordi ja ühenduse tootmisharu halva olukorra vahel.
It has further been examined whether compelling reasons exist that could lead to the conclusion that it would not be in the Community interest to impose anti-dumping measures on the imports from the countries concerned.
Täiendavalt on kontrollitud, kas on olemas mõjuvaid põhjusi, mis võiks viia järelduseni, et ühenduse huvides ei ole rakendada dumpinguvastaseid meetmeid asjaomastest riikidest pärineva impordi suhtes.
For this purpose and in accordance with Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation, the determination of Community interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, i.e. those of the Community industry, the importers/traders, the distributors, the retailers and the end-users (associations as well as end-consumers).
Seetõttu ja ühtlasi vastavalt algmääruse artikli 21 lõikele 1, määratletakse ühenduse huvid arvestades kõigi osapoolte huvisid, sealhulgas ühenduse tootmisharu, importijate/hulgimüüjate, jaemüüjate ja lõpptarbijate (nii ühenduste kui ka üksiktarbijate) huvisid.
The Commission contacted a significant number of interested parties to obtain their views.
Komisjon võttis ühendust märkimisväärse hulga huvitatud isikutega, et nende seisukohti välja selgitada.
In addition to the Community industry, representatives of all the major sales brands on the market such as Verbatim, Maxell, Philips, TDK and Sony as well as some representative retailers such as Carrefour, Tesco, Metro-Group, including Media-Saturn, Fnac and El Corte Inglés have been heard.
Lisaks ühenduse tootmisharule kuulati ära ka suuremate turul tegutsevate kaubamärkide, nagu Verbatim, Maxell, Philips, TDK ja Sony, esindajad ja mõned tüüpilised jaemüüjad, nagu Carrefour, Tesco, Metro-Group, samuti Media-Saturn, Fnac ja El Corte Inglés.
All importers, distributors, whole-sellers or retailers have expressed opposition to any imposition of measures.
Kõik importijad, levitajad, hulgimüüjad või jaemüüjad on väljendanud vastuseisu igasuguste meetmete kehtestamisele.
Following the imposition of anti-dumping measures on imports of CD-Rs originating in Taiwan (and of the imposition of countervailing measures on imports of CD-Rs originating in India), the Community industry, as constituted in this proceeding, had a market share of 2 %.
Pärast Taiwanist pärit CD-R-de impordile dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtestamist (ja Indiast pärit impordile tasakaalustavate meetmete kehtestamist) oli ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa 2 %.
Given this remote market share, it is considered that even if measures were imposed, the Community industry would in all likelihood not be in a position to raise its prices to a sufficient level.
Arvestades turuosa väiksust leitakse, et isegi meetmete kehtestamisel ei ole ühenduse tootmisharu tõenäoliselt võimeline tõstma oma hindu vajalikule tasemele.
The complainant has argued that the negative prospects for the Community industry in the preceding recital would be inconsistent with the reasoning in the Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002 imposing definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of CD-Rs originating in Taiwan.
Kaebuse esitaja on väitnud, et eelnevates põhjendustes kirjeldatud ühenduse tootmisharu negatiivsed väljavaated on vastuolus põhjendustega nõukogu määruses (EÜ) nr 1050/2002, millega kehtestatakse lõplikud dumpinguvastased meetmed Taiwanist pärit CD-R-de impordile.
In comparison to the situation in 2000 (which was the investigation period for the anti-dumping investigation leading to the adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002), two important differences have emerged:
Võrreldes 2000. aasta olukorraga (mis oli dumpinguvastase uurimise perioodiks enne nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1050/2002 vastuvõtmist), on esile tõusnud kaks olulist erinevust:
whereas the market share of the Community industry in the previous investigation was 12,6 % (consisting of 9 companies), the market share of the Community industry in the present investigation was limited to 2 % (consisting of one sole company).
kuigi eelmise uurimise ajal oli ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa 12,6 % (hõlmates 9 ettevõtet), on ühenduse turuosa käesoleva uurimise ajal 2 % (hõlmates ainult ühte ettevõtet).
In view of the fact that the market share of the Community industry is only one sixth of the market share it held in 2000, consisting only of one sole company (following the exclusion of a number of Community manufacturers which have been found to have imported themselves), the more negative assessment of the prospects for the Community industry in this investigation is fully reasonable,
Arvestades asjaolu, et ühenduse turuosa on ainult üks kuuendik 2000. aasta turuosast ning see hõlmab vaid ühte ettevõtet (pärast terve rea ühenduse tootjate väljaarvamist, kuna selgus, et nad on ise importijad), on käesoleva uurimise tulemusel esitatud märksa negatiivsem hinnang ühenduse tootmisharu väljavaadetele täiesti põhjendatud;
by the IP, the product concerned is considered to have reached a mature stage in its life cycle and is treated as a commodity at the retail level.
uurimisperioodiks on vaatlusalune toode jõudnud küpsesse etappi ja seda käsitletakse jaemüügi tasandil tarbekaubana.
This has been confirmed by the distributors and retailers that co-operated in the investigation.
Seda on kinnitanud uurimisega koostööd tegevad levitajad ja jaemüüjad.
As seen in recital (65) above, consumption of CD-Rs have decreased by 7 percentage points since 2003 as alternative storage facilities (hard discs, USB-sticks, Mp3-players, etc.) have become more accessible and more attractive for end-consumers.
Nagu näha eespool esitatud põhjendusest 65, on CD-R-de tarbimine alates 2003. aastast 7 protsendipunkti võrra vähenenud, kuna lõpptarbijatele on palju kättesaadavamaks ja atraktiivsemaks muutunud muud salvestatavad andmekandjad (kõvakettad, USB-mälupulgad, mp3-mängijad jne).
The technological development in the market of media storage devices has been found to be fast and new media storage products have the advantage (in comparison to CD-Rs) of bigger storage capacity which, in the case of flash memory sticks, is combined with small sizes.
Salvestatavate andmekandjate turul toimunud tehnoloogiline areng on olnud kiire ja uutel salvestatavatel andmekandjatel on (võrreldes CD-R-dega) suurem salvestusruum, mälupulgad on lisaks mõõtmetelt väikesed.
In view of the changed circumstances laid down in the preceding recital, it is considered fully consistent with the basic Regulation that the prospects for the Community industry in this investigation are assessed differently in comparison to the reasoning set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002.
Arvestades eespool esitatud muutunud asjaolusid, peetakse algmäärusega täiesti kooskõlas olevaks, et ühenduse tootmisharu väljavaateid hinnatakse käesoleva uurimise tulemusel teisiti kui nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1050/2002 põhjendustes.
The complainant has further argued that some of the non-cooperating producers that have ceased their production during or after the end of the IP could resume their production should measures be introduced.
Kaebuse esitaja on lisaks väitnud, et mõned koostööd mittetegevad tootjad, kes on uurimisperioodi ajal või pärast seda tootmise lõpetanud, võivad meetmete rakendamise korral uuesti tootmist alustada.
However, in the absence of information directly from these non-cooperating producers that would confirm these alleged intentions, or other evidence substantiating the allegation, this argument has to be rejected.
Sellegipoolest tuleb see argument tagasi lükata, kuna koostööd mittetegevatelt tootjatelt puudub otsene teave, mis kinnitaks nende väidetavaid kavatsusi.
It is also noted that even if these companies were to resume production, their production would in all likelihood not be very substantial as compared to the volumes imported from the countries concerned.
Märgitakse ka, et isegi kui ettevõte taaskäivitab tootmise, ei ole selle toodangu maht võrreldes asjaomastest riikidest imporditava toodanguga kuigi märkimisväärne.
A number of parties have further argued that, should measures be introduced, the resulting cost increase would have to be borne by one or several levels in the distribution chain (thereby significantly decreasing their respective margins), or passed on to the consumers (thereby perhaps affecting the overall consumption of CD-Rs negatively), or shared between both.
Paljud isikud on väitnud, et kui meetmed võetakse, suurenevad selle tulemusel kulud ühes või mitmes tarneketi osas (vähendades seejuures märkimisväärselt vastava osa kasumit), kulud kantakse üle tarbijatele (mis mõjub tõenäoliselt negatiivselt CD-R-de üldisele tarbimisele) või jagunevad mõlema vahel.
The likely reaction of importers, distributors or retailers to the cost increase following the imposition of measures would depend on the situation in each Member State.
Importijate, levitajate või jaemüüjate reaktsioon meetmete võtmisele järgnevale kulude suurenemisele sõltub olukorrast igas üksikus liikmesriigis.
In some Member States, the demand for CD-Rs is indeed already under pressure from the mentioned ‘special levies’ on recordable media (a tax which increases the retail price significantly for the consumer).
Mõnes liikmesriigis on CD-R-de nõudlus salvestatavatele andmekandjatele kehtestatud erilõivude (maks, mis oluliselt suurendab tarbija jaoks jaemüügihinda) tõttu juba niigi surve all.
In this case, the consumers of CD-Rs would possibly not be ready to pay more as a result of anti-dumping duties as the retail price is already perceived as high.
Neil juhtudel ei ole CD-R-de tarbijad ilmselt valmis maksma dumpinguvastaste lõivudega kaasnevat kõrgemat hinda, kuna jaemüügi hinda peetakse praegugi kõrgeks.
The full cost of measures would in all likelihood therefore have to be borne by the distribution chain in order to avoid that consumers turn even more increasingly to other means of media storages such as hard discs and flash memory sticks.
Meetmete täiskulud tuleb seetõttu leida tarneketi seest, et vältida tarbijate pöördumist veelgi enam teiste salvestatavate andmekandjate poole, nagu kõvakettad ja mälupulgad.
As the mark-up of the importers/wholesalers in these countries can be estimated at around 4 %, the imposition of anti-dumping duties would significantly decrease the already small margin.
Kuna nendes riikides on importijate/hulgimüüjate juurdehindlus hinnanguliselt 4 %, vähendaks dumpinguvastaste tollimaksude kehtestamine niigi väikest kasumit veelgi.
Conversely, in Member States with the lowest (or absence of) special levies, it is more likely that a substantial part of the cost increase will be passed on to consumers.
Neis liikmesriikides, kus on madalad erilõivud (või puuduvad need hoopis), on vastupidi tõenäolisem, et oluline osa kulude tõusust kantakse üle tarbijatele.
Therefore, the relative effect of anti-dumping measures would be the greatest there, since the price increase would be relatively higher.
Seetõttu oleks dumpinguvastaste meetmete kasutegur kõige suurem just seal, kuna hinnatõus oleks oluliselt suurem.
As a result, consumption might further decrease, as consumers would have an incentive to turn to substitution products.
Selle tulemusena võib tarbimine veelgi väheneda, kuna tarbijad hakkaksid asendustooteid eelistama.
It follows from the above that the price strategy of the importers, distributors and retailers will vary depending on the situation in each Member State.
Ülaltoodust järeldub, et importijate, levitajate ja jaemüüjate hinnastrateegia sõltub iga liikmesriigi olukorrast.
Nonetheless, it is apparent that all of them will suffer from the introduction of anti-dumping measures, either by way of decreased margins or by way of decreased sales volumes.
Sellegipoolest on ilmne, et nad kõik saaksid dumpinguvastaste meetmete kehtestamise tõttu kannatada, kas kasumi või müügimahu vähenemise tõttu.
Similarly, to the extent that the cost increase of anti-dumping measures is passed on the consumers, the latter will also be negatively affected.
Samuti oleks negatiivne mõju tarbijatele, sõltuvalt sellest, kui suures ulatuses jäetakse dumpinguvastaste meetmete tõttu suurenevad kulud lõpptarbijate kanda.
It has also been argued that the situation of the Community industry is the result of abusive price behaviour by certain dominant exporting producers, consisting in pursuing a strategy of below-cost prices which has prevented the Community industry from building up any significant market presence.
Väidetud on ka seda, et ühenduse tootmisharu olukord tuleneb sellest, et teatud turgu valitsevad eksportivad tootjad rakendavad teistele kahjulikku hinnapoliitikat, mis seisneb toodete müümises alla omahinna, ning see on takistanud ühenduse tootmisharu jõuliselt turul osalemast.
Firstly, it has to be noted that a corresponding decision or investigation concerning an abuse of dominance under the EC competition rules does not exist, nor has the complainant pointed to any respective decision under national competition rules.
Esiteks tuleb märkida, et Euroopa Ühenduse konkurentsireeglitele vastavat otsust või uuringut turgu valitseva positsiooni kuritarvitamise kohta ei ole tehtud, samuti ei ole kaebuse esitaja viidanud ühelegi samasisulisele liikmesriikide konkurentsireeglite põhjal tehtud otsusele.
Secondly, the investigation has revealed a large number of operators in Europe and the world on the relevant product market.
Teiseks, uurimise käigus on selgunud, et kõnelause toote turul tegutseb suur hulk Euroopa ja maailma ettevõtjaid.