natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In conclusion, for the purposes of this proceeding and in accordance with consistent Community practice, it is therefore considered that all types of the product described above, with the exception of STAF, should be regarded as forming one single product.
Käesoleva menetluse puhul ja kooskõlas ühenduse järjepideva tavaga leiti, et kõik eespool kirjeldatud tootetüübid, välja arvatud STAF-jalatsid, peaksid moodustama ühtse toote.
The product concerned is footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, as described above, originating in PRC and in Vietnam.
Vaatlusalune toode on eespool kirjeldatud nahast või komposiitnahast pealsega jalats, mis on pärit HRVst või Vietnamist.
The investigation has shown, as mentioned above, that all types of footwear with uppers of leather despite the differences in terms of type and style, have the same basic physical and technical characteristics, i.e. outdoor footwear with uppers of leather, they are basically used for the same purposes, and can be regarded as different types of the same product.
Nagu eespool mainitud, on uurimine näidanud, et kõikidel nahast pealsetega jalatsite tüüpidel on ühesugused füüsilised ja tehnilised omadused hoolimata tüübi ja stiili erinevustest – need on nahast pealsetega välisjalatsid, mida kasutatakse peamiselt ühesugustel eesmärkidel ja mida võib käsitada kui sama toote erinevaid tüüpe.
Therefore, for the purpose of this investigation the product concerned is footwear with uppers of leather, as described in the ‘General’ part above, originating in PRC and Vietnam (the product concerned).
Seetõttu on käesoleva uurimise puhul vaatlusalused tooted HRVst või Vietnamist pärit nahast pealsetega jalatsid, nagu on kirjeldatud eespool peatükis “Üldteave” (edaspidi “vaatlusalune toode”).
This product is currently classifiable within the following CN codes: ex64032000, ex64033000, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000.
See toode on praegu liigitatud järgmiste CN-koodide alla: ex64032000, ex64033000, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 ja ex64051000.
It should be noted that until 1 January 2005, the products originating in PRC and falling within the above CN codes were subject to a quantitative quota, with the exception of the products falling within CN codes 64032000 and ex64033000, and those footwear used for sporting activities and involving a special technology.
Peab märkima, et HRVst pärit tooted, mis liigitati eespool nimetatud CN-koodide alla, kuulusid enne 1. jaanuari 2005 koguseliste kvootide kohaldamisalasse, välja arvatud tooted, mida liigitatakse CN-koodide 64032000 ja ex64033000 alla, ning neid jalatseid kasutati sportimiseks ja neid valmistati eritehnoloogia abil.
It is therefore concluded that, for the purpose of the present anti-dumping proceeding, all types of the product concerned are regarded as one product.
Seetõttu järeldati, et käesoleva dumpinguvastase menetluse huvides käsitatakse kõiki vaatlusaluseid tooteid ühe tootena.
The investigation showed that the product concerned and the footwear with uppers of leather manufactured and sold domestically in PRC and Vietnam as well as footwear with uppers of leather produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry were similar as far as their basic physical and technical characteristics and uses are concerned, and that they are perceived by users as being interchangeable.
Uurimine näitas, et vaatlusalune toode ja nahast pealsetega jalatsid, mida toodetakse ja müüakse HRV ja Vietnami siseturgudel, nagu ka nahast pealsetega jalatsid, mida toodetakse ja müüakse ühenduses ühenduse tootmisharu poolt, olid sarnased põhiliste füüsiliste ja tehniliste omaduste ja kasutusala poolest ning kasutajad tajuvad neid vastastikku asendatavatena.
Certain interested parties argued that footwear with uppers of leather produced by the Community industry and sold on the Community market was not similar to the product concerned.
Osad huvitatud isikud väitsid, et ühenduse tootmisharu poolt toodetud ja ühenduse turul müüdavad nahast pealsetega jalatsid ei ole vaatlusaluse tootega sarnased.
They claimed that this is evidenced in particular by differences between products in terms of quality, consumer perceptions, channels of sales and segmentation.
Nad väitsid, et seda tõendab eeskätt erinevus kvaliteedis, tarbijapoolses tajumises, müügikanalites ja turusegmentides.
It was further claimed that the consumers in the Community usually perceive the product concerned as being a cheaper product and that those products do not benefit from any brand premium.
Lisaks väideti, et ühenduse tarbijad tajuvad tavaliselt vaatlusalust toodet kui odavamat ning need tooted ei saa mingit kasu kaubamärgiga seotud tulust.
The investigation revealed contradictory statements by importers in that respect.
Uurimine näitas, et importijad on selles suhtes vastuolulisi avaldusi teinud.
While some claimed that the product concerned is usually of inferior quality and remains in a different price category compared to Community made products, others claimed that brand footwear manufactured in the countries concerned is imported at higher prices, probably of mediocre quality, imported at an extremely low price, from those same countries.
Tõesti, kui mõned väitsid, et vaatlusalusel tootel on tavaliselt madalam kvaliteet ja see jääb teistsugusesse hinnaklassi võrreldes ühenduses tehtud tootega, siis teised väitsid, et kõnealustes riikides toodetud kaubamärgiga jalatseid imporditakse kõrgema hinnaga kui asjaomastest riikidest pärit erakordselt madala hinnaga ja arvatavasti madala kvaliteediga jalatsid.
On the other hand, the investigation confirmed that in the Community both, low and high quality footwear are manufactured and sold via the same distribution channels as the product concerned, i.e. independent retailers, non-specialised supermarkets, department stores, etc.
Teisest küljest kinnitas uurimine, et ühenduses toodetakse ning turustatakse mõlemaid, nii madala kui kõrge lõpphinnaga jalatseid samade turustamiskanalite kaudu mis vaatlusalusel tootel, st iseseisvate jaemüüjate, spetsialiseerumata selvehallide, kaubamajade jne kaudu.
In addition, footwear does not necessarily indicate its country of origin, and it is therefore often very difficult for the consumer to make the distinction between footwear manufactured in the countries concerned and Community made products.
Lisaks ei näidata jalatsitel alati päritoluriike, seetõttu on tarbijal sageli väga keeruline teha vahet jalatsitel, mis on toodetud kõnealustes riikides või ühenduses.
For those reasons, it is considered that, whatever its origin, footwear produced in the countries concerned and in the Community compete at all levels of the market and are not subject to different consumer perceptions.
Nendel põhjustel peetakse silmas, et sõltumata päritolust, konkureerivad kõnealustes riikides ja ühenduses toodetud jalatsid turu kõigil tasanditel ja tarbija ei taju neid erinevana.
While there may be some minor differences between the product concerned and Community production, it is considered that these differences do not affect the substantial basic characteristics, properties and uses of the product.
Kuna vaatlusaluse toote ja ühenduses toodetud toote vahel võivad olla mõned väikesed erinevused, siis arvestatakse sellega, et need erinevused ei mõjuta toote olulisi põhiomadusi, muid omadusi ja toote kasutust.
Likewise, no major differences were found between the product concerned and footwear with uppers of leather produced and sold both by the exporters/producers on their domestic market and sold by producers in Brazil, which served as an analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value for those companies that were not granted market economy treatment.
Samamoodi ei leitud suuri erinevusi vaatlusaluse toote ja nahast pealsetega jalatsite vahel, mida toodavad ja müüvad eksportijad ja tootjad oma riigi siseturul ning müüvad tootjad Brasiilias, mida sai kasutada võrdlusriigina selleks, et määrata kindlaks normaalväärtus nende ettevõtete jaoks, millele ei võimaldatud turumajanduslikku kohtlemist.
In view of the above, it is provisionally concluded that, in accordance with Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, and for the purpose of this investigation, all types of footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather produced and sold in the countries concerned and in Brazil and those produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market are alike to those exported from the countries concerned to the Community.
Arvestades eespool nimetatut, otsustati esialgu, et vastavalt algmääruse artikli 1 lõikele 4 ja käesoleva uurimise eesmärgil on kõik kõnealustes riikides ja Brasiilias toodetavad ja müüdavad nahast ja komposiitnahast pealsetega jalatsid ning ühenduses toodetavad ja müüdavad jalatsid sarnased nendega, mida eksporditakse kõnealustest riikidest ühendusse.
Sampling for exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam
HRV ja Vietnami eksportivate tootjate väljavõtteline uuring
In view of the large number of exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the determination of dumping, in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Arvestades HRV ja Vietnami eksportivate tootjate suurt arvu nähti algatamisteates vastavalt algmääruse artikli 17 lõikele 1 ette väljavõtteline uuring dumpingu kindlaksmääramiseks.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide basic information on their export and domestic sales, their precise activities with regard to the production of the product concerned and the names and activities of all their related companies involved in the production and/or selling of the product concerned.
Et komisjon saaks otsustada, kas väljavõtteline uuring on vajalik, ja vastava vajaduse korral valimi moodustada, paluti eksportivatel tootjatel endast teatada 15 päeva jooksul alates uurimise algatamisest ning esitada põhiandmed oma ekspordi ja omamaise müügi ja vaatlusaluse toote tootmisega seotud täpse tegevuse kohta ning vaatlusaluse toote tootmise ja/või müügiga tegelevate seotud ettevõtete nimed ja tegevusalad.
The authorities in the PRC and Vietnam were also consulted.
Samuti konsulteeriti HRV ja Vietnami ametiasutustega.
Preselection of cooperating exporting producers
Koostööd tegevate eksportivate tootjate eelvalik
Some 163 companies in the PRC and 86 companies in Vietnam came forward and provided the requested information within the given deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Endast andis teada 163 ettevõtet HRVs ja 86 ettevõtet Vietnamis, kes võimaldasid ka juurdepääsu nõutud teabele tähtaja jooksul, mis oli nimetatud algatamisteates.
However, only 154 Chinese exporting producers and 81 Vietnamese exporting producers reported exports to the Community during the investigation period.
Ent üksnes 154 Hiina eksportivat tootjat ja 81 Vietnami eksportivat tootjat andsid teada ekspordist ühendusse uurimisperioodi jooksul.
Those exporting producers that exported the product concerned to the Community during the investigation period and expressed a wish to participate in the sample, were initially considered as cooperating companies and were taken into account in the selection of the sample.
Eksportivad tootjad, kes eksportisid vaatlusalust toodet ühendusse uurimisperioodi jooksul ja avaldasid soovi väljavõttelises uuringus osaleda, arvati algselt koostööd tegevate ettevõtete hulka ja nendega arvestati valimi moodustamisel.
Exporting producers which did not make themselves known within the aforesaid period or did not provide the requested information in due time, were considered as non-cooperating with the investigation.
Eksportivad tootjad, kes ei andnud endast teada eespool nimetatud ajavahemiku jooksul või ei andnud ettenähtud aja jooksul nõutud teavet, käsitati uurimise puhul koostööst keeldununa.
In the case of the PRC, a sample of the four largest exporting producers was originally considered in line with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
HRV puhul peeti esialgu nelja suurema eksportiva tootja valimit algmääruse artikli 17 lõikega 1 kooskõlas olevaks.
This would have allowed a limited investigation and still be reasonably representative.
See oleks lubanud piirata uurimist ning olnud siiski mõistlikul määral esindav.
However, in the course of the consultation process with the interested parties, represented in this case by the Chinese authorities and the respective Chinese producers' association, the Chinese authorities insisted that more companies be added to the list in order to increase the representative level of the sample.
Konsultatsioonide jooksul huvitatud isikutega, keda käesoleval juhul esindasid Hiina ametiasutused ja vastavad Hiina tootjate ühendused, taotlesid Hiina ametiasutused ometi, et nimekirja tuleb lisada rohkem ettevõtteid, et suurendada valimi esindavust.
Consequently, the sample was significantly extended to 13 Chinese exporting producers, representing over 20 % of the Chinese export volume to the Community.
Selle tulemusena laiendati valimit märkimisväärselt 13 Hiina eksportiva tootja võrra ja valim esindas nüüd üle 20 % Hiina ekspordimahust ühendusse.
The Chinese authorities gave their full agreement to the sample chosen.
Hiina ametiasutused andsid oma täieliku nõusoleku valimi suhtes.
In the case of Vietnam, a sample of the four largest exporting producers was also originally considered in line with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ka Vietnami puhul kaaluti algul kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 17 lõikega 1 valimi koostamist neljast suuremast eksportivast tootjast.
However, given the request made by the Chinese authorities to increase the representative level of the sample of Chinese exporters, and in order not to have samples significantly different inrepresentative terms for the two countries concerned, it was decided to also increase the size of the sample of the Vietnamese exporters to eight companies.
Arvestades Hiina ametiasutuste taotlust suurendada Hiina eksportijate esindavust valimis ja selleks, et mitte saada kummagi riigi kohta esindavuse mõttes kaht väga erinevat valimit, otsustati suurendada ka Vietnami eksportijate valimit kaheksa ettevõtteni.
At the end of the discussion process with the Vietnamese authorities, which were in contact with the Vietnamese association of producers, full agreement was reached with those authorities on a sample of eight companies in Vietnam.
Pärast arutelu Vietnami ametiasutustega, kes olid kontaktis Vietnami tootjate ühendustega, saavutati täielik kokkulepe määrata valimi suuruseks Vietnamis kaheksa ettevõtet.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the following criteria were taken into account in the selection of the sample:
Kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 17 lõikega 1 arvestati valimi koostamisel järgmisi kriteeriume:
size of exporting producer with regard to export sales to the Community,
eksportivate tootjate suurus seoses ekspordiga ühendusse,
size of exporting producer with regard to domestic sales.
eksportivate tootjate suurus seoses omamaise müügiga.
Regarding the second criteria above, it was considered essential to include in the sample, some companies with domestic sales in order to have as representative a cross-section of the footwear industry in the samples as possible.
Selleks et valimis oleks esindatud jalatsitööstusest võimalikult lai läbilõige, peeti eespool nimetatud teise kriteeriumi puhul oluliseks lisada valimisse mõned ettevõtted, kes müüsid tooteid oma riigis.
This was necessary, in particular, to have information available, in the event that some or all exporters in the samples would fulfil the MET criteria, on prices and costs associated with producing and selling the product concerned on the domestic markets of the countries concerned.
See oli vajalik eeskätt selleks, et saada teavet vaatlusaluse toote hindade ning tootmiskulude ja asjaomaste riikide siseturul müügi kulude kohta juhul, kui mõned eksportijad valimites vastavad turumajandusliku kohtlemise kriteeriumile.
Therefore, only the major exporting companies which also represented a major part of the domestic sales have been selected.
Seetõttu valiti välja üksnes suuremad eksportivad tootjad, kes ühtlasi esindasid ka suuremat osa omamaisest müügist.
The selected companies accounted for respectively around 25 and 22 % of the export quantities to the Community of the Chinese and Vietnamese cooperating exporting producers and respectively around 42 and 50 % of domestic sales in the PRC and Vietnam reported by the cooperating exporters.
Valitud ettevõtete puhul arvestati esindavaks 25 % HRV ja 22 % Vietnami koostööd tegevate eksportivate ettevõtete ekspordimahust ühendusse ning ligikaudu 42 % HRV ja 50 % Vietnami omamaisest müügist, nagu andsid teada koostööd tegevad ettevõtted.
The exclusion of the STAF products did not significantly influence the representative sample.
STAF-toodete väljajätmine ei mõjutanud oluliselt valimi esindavust.
The cooperating exporting producers, which were not finally retained in the sample, were informed through the Chinese or Vietnamese authorities that any anti-dumping duty on their exports would be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Koostööd tegevaid eksportivaid tootjaid, kes ei jäänud lõpuks valimisse, teavitati Hiina ja Vietnami ametiasutuste kaudu, et iga dumpinguvastane tollimaks nende ekspordi suhtes arvestatakse vastavalt algmääruse artikli 9 lõike 6 sätetele.
Questionnaires were sent for completion to all sampled companies and replies from all of them, except one in the PRC, were received within the given deadlines.
Küsimustikud saadeti väljavalitud ettevõtetele ja kõigilt neilt, välja arvatud ühelt HRV ettevõttelt, saadi vastused ettenähtud tähtaja jooksul.
Four exporting producers in the PRC and four exporting producers in Vietnam, which were not included in the sample, claimed an individual dumping margin and have provided the relevant information within the given deadline, with a view to the application of Articles 9(6) and 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Neli eksportivat tootjat HRVs ja neli eksportivat tootjat Vietnamis, keda ei võetud valimisse, nõudsid individuaalset dumpingumarginaali ning olid andnud olulist teavet etteantud tähtaja jooksul, arvestades algmääruse artikli 9 lõiget 6 ja artikli 17 lõiget 3.
However, in view of the unprecedented size of the samples which concerned 20 companies and many other related parties, the Commission concluded, in accordance with Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation, that no individual examination of exporting producers in the PRC nor Vietnam could be granted because this would have been unduly burdensome and would have prevented completion of the investigation in good time.
Ent arvestades valimi enneolematut suurust, mis puudutas 20 ettevõtet ja mitmeid teisi seotuid pooli, järeldas komisjon vastavalt algmääruse artikli 17 lõikele 3, et eksportivate tootjate individuaalset kontrolli ei saa teha HRV ega Vietnami puhul, sest see oleks põhjendamatult koormav ning võib takistada kontrollimise lõpuleviimist mõistliku tähtaja jooksul.
As far as Community producers are concerned, the Commission selected a sample based primarily on the size of the relevant Community producers in terms of production volume.
Komisjon koostas ühenduse tootjatest valimi eelkõige asjaomaste ühenduse tootjate tootmismahu alusel.
This was based on the information provided by the producers themselves and by their national associations.
See põhines teabel, mida tootjad ja nende riiklikud ühendused olid ise andnud.
In order to receive a balanced picture of the footwear industry, the geographical location of the producers was also considered.
Saamaks jalatsitööstusest tasakaalustatud pilti, arvestati ka tootjate geograafilist asukohta.
Thus, the sample, which primarily reflects the size and importance of the various producing companies, also reflects the geographical spread of the industry in the Community.
Seega valim, mis kajastab eelkõige tootmisettevõtete tähtsust ja suurust, kajastab ka tööstuse geograafilist levikut ühenduses.
The 10 producers in the sample represent around 10 % of the production of the complainant Community producers.
Valimi kümme tootjat esindavad 10 % kaebuse esitanud ühenduse tootjate toodangust.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC and Vietnam, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is demonstrated by such exporting producers that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
Kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktiga b määratakse dumpinguvastastes uurimistes, mis käsitlevad importi HRVst ja Vietnamist, normaalväärtus vastavalt nimetatud artikli lõigetele 1 kuni 6 nende eksportivate tootjate osas, kes vastasid kriteeriumile, mis on sätestatud algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktis c, st juhul kui sellised eksportivad tootjad on näidanud, et samasuguste toodete valmistamisel ja müügil valitsevad turumajanduslikud tingimused.
accounting records are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes;
raamatupidamisdokumentide auditeerimine toimub sõltumatult ja kooskõlas rahvusvaheliste raamatupidamisstandarditega ning raamatupidamisdokumente kasutatakse kõigil eesmärkidel;
All the Chinese and the Vietnamese producers selected in the samples requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadlines.
Kõik valimisse valitud Hiina ja Vietnami tootjad vastasid nõutud turumajandusliku kohtlemise nõuetele kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktiga b ja olid vastanud eksportivate tootjate turumajandusliku kohtlemise taotlusele ettenähtud tähtaja jooksul.
However, one Chinese producer did not submit a questionnaire reply subsequent to having had its request for MET examined.
Üks Hiina tootja ei esitanud küsimustiku vastust pärast seda, kui tema taotlus turumajandusliku kohtlemise kohta vaadati läbi.
In these circumstances, it is necessary to establish a dumping margin for this producer on the basis of facts available.
Sellises olukorras on vaja kehtestada nendele tootjatele dumpingumarginaal olemasoleva teabe alusel.
Consequently, its request for MET is null and void and only 12 MET claims of the remaining sampled Chinese exporting producers have been further analysed by the Commission.
Järelikult on nende taotlus turumajandusliku kohtlemise kohta alusetu ja üksnes 12 taotlust ülejäänud Hiina eksportivate tootjate valimist kuuluvad komisjoni poolt edaspidisele analüüsimisele.
For those companies selected in the samples, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified all information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the companies in question.
Nendele valimisse kuuluvate ettevõtete puhul otsis komisjon kõiki andmeid, mida ta pidas vajalikuks, ja kontrollis kõnealuste ettevõtete ruumides kõiki andmeid, mis olid esitatud turumajandusliku kohtlemise taotluses.
MET determination regarding exporting producers in the PRC
Turumajandusliku kohtlemise määramine HRV eksportivate tootjate suhtes
The following table summarises situation of each company against each of the five criteria as set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Järgmises tabelis on esitatud kokkuvõte iga ettevõtte määramise kohta viie kriteeriumi alusel, mis on esitatud algmääruse artikli 2 lõikes 7 punktis c.