natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An amendment to this letter was sent by letter of 1 February 2006, registered by the Commission on the same day.
Selle kirja lisa saadeti 1. veebruari 2006. aasta kirjas, mille komisjon registreeris samal päeval.
Further additional information on the Measure was submitted by the United Kingdom by letter of 7 February 2006, registered by the Commission on the same day.
Ühendkuningriik esitas meetme kohta veel lisateavet 7. veebruari 2006. aasta kirjas, mille komisjon registreeris samal päeval.
Further additional information was submitted by the United Kingdom by letter of 7 February 2006, registered by the Commission on 10 February 2006.
Ühendkuningriik esitas täiendava lisateabe 7. veebruari 2006. aasta kirjas, mille komisjon registreeris 10. veebruaril 2006. aastal.
Further additional information was submitted by the United Kingdom by letter dated 29 March 2006, registered by the Commission on 30 March 2006.
Peale selle esitas Ühendkuningriik veel lisateavet 29. märtsi 2006. aasta kirjas, mille komisjon registreeris 30. märtsil 2006. aastal.
The United Kingdom was one of the first countries worldwide to engage in nuclear technologies, both for civil and military purposes.
Ühendkuningriik oli üks esimesi riike maailmas, kes rakendas tuumatehnoloogiat nii tsiviil- kui ka sõjalisel eesmärgil.
At the time these technologies were first introduced, the emphasis of the industry was on scientific improvements and on gains in efficiency.
Ajal, mil see tehnoloogia võeti esmakordselt kasutusele, pöörati peamist tähelepanu teaduse edusammudele ning tõhususe saavutamisele.
The management of nuclear liabilities was generally not taken into consideration, or only in a very limited way.
Tuumarajatiste kohustusi üldiselt ei võetud arvesse või nendega arvestati väga pealiskaudselt.
The rising awareness of the need to ultimately decommission nuclear sites progressively resulted in funds being set aside for the management of nuclear liabilities.
Tänu kasvavale teadlikkusele tuumarajatiste lõpliku likvideerimise vajadusest eraldati tuumarajatiste kohustuste täitmiseks rahalisi vahendeid.
However, these funds were generally insufficient to face liabilities the estimated amount of which was still very uncertain, but growing.
Neist aga ei piisanud selleks, et tulla toime kohustustega, mille hinnanguline suurus oli veel väga ebamäärane ja kasvas järjest.
Even at the end of the 20th century, the management of nuclear liabilities was still handled independently by each of their owners, and very much on a case by case basis.
Isegi 20. sajandi lõpul tegelesid tuumarajatiste kohustuste haldamisega kõik nende omanikud eraldi ja enamjaolt olukorrast olenevalt.
The UK Government considered that this kind of management had reached its limits and that a new and more efficient method should be put in place in order for nuclear liabilities to be more efficiently handled, while preserving the highest level of safety.
Ühendkuningriigi valitsus oli arvamusel, et selline haldamine on ennast ammendanud ning tuumarajatiste kohustuste tõhusamaks käsitlemiseks tuleb see ohutust säilitades asendada uue ja tõhusama meetodiga.
In 2001, the United Kingdom Government decided to start a review of ways in which the management of public sector nuclear liabilities could be concentrated in the hands of a single public body.
aastal otsustas Ühendkuningriik hakata otsima viise, kuidas koondada avalikule sektorile kuuluvate tuumarajatiste kohustuste haldamine ühtse avalik-õigusliku asutuse kätte.
A White Paper entitled Managing the Nuclear Legacy — A strategy for action was published in July 2002.
aasta juulis avaldati valge raamat pealkirjaga “Managing the Nuclear Legacy – A strategy for action”.
After a consultation process, the ideas of the White Paper were implemented in legislation in the form of the 2004 Energy Act.
Valge raamatu ideid rakendati pärast konsulteerimist õigusaktides 2004. aasta energiaseaduse kujul.
Under the provisions of this legislation, a new non-departmental public body, known as the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), was created.
Selle õigusakti sätete alusel asutati uus valitsusväline avalik-õiguslik asutus, tuumarajatiste likvideerimise agentuur (Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, edaspidi “NDA”).
The NDA will progressively be made responsible for the management of most public sector nuclear liabilities in the United Kingdom.
NDA hakkab järk-järgult vastutama enamiku avalikule sektorile kuuluvate Ühendkuningriigi tuumarajatiste kohustuste haldamise eest.
For this purpose, the ownership of nuclear sites and assets will be transferred to the NDA.
Selleks antakse tuumarajatised ja varad NDA omandisse.
Along with the ownership of the assets and sites, the NDA will take over the responsibility for the nuclear liabilities linked to them as well as all financial assets that are clearly attached to these sites.
Koos varade ja rajatiste omandiõigusega antakse NDAle üle ka nii vastutus tuumarajatistega seotud kohustuste eest kui ka kõik nende rajatistega selgelt seotud finantsvarad.
The management of nuclear liabilities in an efficient and safe way is the NDA's objective.
NDA eesmärk on hallata tõhusalt ja ohutult tuumarajatiste kohustusi.
The NDA can continue to operate the physical assets that are transferred to it if the continued operation of these assets covers more than their avoidable costs and therefore contributes to reducing the value of their liabilities.
NDA võib jätkata talle üle antud materiaalse põhivara käigushoidmist, kui nende varade käigushoidmisega kaetakse enamat kui nende vältimatud kulud, vähendades seega nende kohustusi.
The NDA is a public authority and does not have a commercial objective.
NDA on avalik-õiguslik asutus, millel ei ole ärilisi eesmärke.
It will not invest in any new asset nor enter any new activity.
Ta ei investeeri uutesse varadesse ega alusta uut tegevust.
The NDA does not itself decommission the sites for which it will have responsibility.
NDA ei likvideeri ise rajatisi, mille eest ta vastutab. Ta annab selle ülesande teistele üksustele.
It will contract this task out to other entities.
Samuti võib NDA sõlmida lepingu tuumarajatiste varade haldamiseks.
Initially, SLCs will be the former owners of the sites.
Esialgu on rajatiste haldajateks rajatiste endised omanikud.
Later on, they will be selected via competitive procedures, with a view to triggering the development of a real nuclear decommissioning and clean-up market.
Hiljem valitakse need pakkumismenetluse teel, pidades silmas seda, kuivõrd nad aitavad kaasa tuumarajatiste likvideerimise ja puhastamise turu tegelikule arengule.
In order to fund its activities, the NDA uses the value of the transferred financial assets and the net revenues that the transferred physical assets generate.
Oma tegevuse rahastamiseks kasutab NDA talle üleantud finantsvarasid ja üleantud materiaalsest põhivarast saadud puhastulu.
Since it is very likely that these resources will not be sufficient to pay for the entire costs of management of the nuclear liabilities, the State will finance the shortfall.
Kuna on üsna tõenäoline, et nendest vahenditest ei piisa selleks, et kanda tuumarajatiste kohustuste haldamise kogukulusid, rahastab puudujäägi riik.
Assets belonging to the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency (UKAEA) have been transferred to the NDA.
NDAle anti üle Ühendkuningriigi Aatomienergia Agentuurile (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, edaspidi “UKAEA”) kuuluvad varad.
This aspect of the Measure has already been decided upon by the Commission in the decision referred to in recital (5) above.
Meetme selle osa kohta tehtud komisjoni otsusele on viidatud eespool 5. põhjenduses.
The Commission found that this aspect of the Measure did not include State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisjon leidis, et meetme kõnealune osa ei kujutanud endast riigiabi EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 87 lõike 1 tähenduses.
The NDA has also received assets belonging to British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL).
NDAle anti üle ka ettevõtjale British Nuclear Fuels Limited (edaspidi “BNFL”) kuuluvad varad.
This aspect of the Measure is the object of the present decision.
Käesolev otsus käsitleb seda meetme osa.
It must be noted that transitional arrangements were put in place by the United Kingdom to ensure that, even though BNFL's assets were formally transferred to the NDA, no State aid is granted until the Commission takes a final decision on the case.
Kuigi BNFLi varad anti NDAle juba ametlikult üle, kehtestas Ühendkuningriik üleminekukorra tagamaks, et riigiabi ei antaks enne, kui komisjon teeb kõnealuse asja kohta lõpliku otsuse.
BNFL is a publicly owned limited company that operates in many fields in the nuclear sector.
BNFL on riigi osalusega äriühing, kes tegutseb tuumaenergiasektori mitmes allharus.
It is present in nearly all steps of the nuclear fuel cycle: it enriches uranium (through Urenco), supplies nuclear fuel, generates electricity and manages spent nuclear fuel.
Ta on tegev peaaegu kõigis tuumkütusetsükli etappides: tegeleb uraani rikastamisega (Urenco kaudu), tarnib tuumkütust, toodab elektrienergiat ja käitleb kasutatud tuumkütust.
Most but not all of BNFL's nuclear activities and sites have been transferred to the NDA.
NDAle on üle antud enamik BNFLi tuumaenergeetikaalasest tegevusest ja rajatistest.
It has received:
Talle on üle antud:
all Magnox electricity generation sites and the Mawntrog station;
kõik magnox-elektrijaamad ja Maentwrogi jaam;
the Sellafield site, including in particular the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) and the Sellafield Mox Plant (SMP).
Sellafieldi rajatis, sealhulgas THORP (Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant edaspidi “THORP”) ja Sellafield Mox Plant (edaspidi “SMP”).
The Sellafield site also includes one of the Magnox plants referred to above (the Calder Hall station) and a small Combined Heat and Power plant (the Fellside plant);
Sellafieldi rajatis hõlmab ka üht eespool nimetatud magnox-jaama (Calder Halli jaam) ja väikest soojuse ja elektri koostootmisjaama (Fellside’i jaam);
the Springfields site, which is dedicated to nuclear fuel manufacturing;
Springfieldsi rajatis, kus toodetakse tuumkütust;
the Drigg low level waste disposal site;
Driggi madala radioaktiivsuse tasemega jäätmete hoidla;
the Capenhurst site, the decommissioning of which is nearly completed, and which will eventually focus on the storage of uranium materials.
Capenhursti rajatis, mille likvideerimine on peaaegu lõpetatud ja kus pärast seda hakatakse ladustama uraani sisaldavat materjali.
Other BNFL activities, in particular the ones linked to Urenco and Westinghouse, will not be transferred to the NDA.
BNFLi muud tegevust, eriti seda, mis on seotud Urenco ja Westinghouse’iga, NDAle üle ei anta.
They will be reorganised, resulting in a smaller residual group.
See korraldatakse ümber, mille tulemusena jääb muid tegevusi vähem alles.
Together with the sites mentioned above, BNFL transfers to the NDA a number of financial assets linked to these sites, which were set up in the past to fund at least in part their decommissioning.
Koos eespool nimetatud rajatistega annab BNFL NDAle üle nende rajatistega seotud finantsvarad, mis koguti varasemal perioodil selleks, et vähemalt osaliselt rahastada nende likvideerimist.
These assets are:
Need varad hõlmavad:
the Nuclear Liabilities Investment Portfolio;
tuumarajatiste kohustusi sisaldavat investeerimisportfelli;
the Magnox Undertaking;
magnox-kohustust (Magnox Undertaking);
other, more minor, contributions, including in particular the Springfields gilts, which are funds earmarked to cover decommissioning costs at the Springfields site.
muid väiksemaid vahendeid, sealhulgas eeskätt Springfieldsi võlakirju, mis on eraldatud selleks, et katta likvideerimiskulusid Springfieldsi rajatises.
Technically, these assets are not transferred directly to the NDA, but rather consolidated in a Government fund, the Nuclear Decommissioning Funding Account.
Neid varasid ei anta üle otse NDAle, vaid kantakse need valitsuse fondi tuumarajatiste likvideerimise rahastamise arvele.
The Government will in turn fund the NDA by grants.
Valitsus aga rahastab NDAd toetustega.
In their notification, the UK authorities had provided the Commission with an estimate of the nuclear liabilities and assets that would be transferred to the NDA, together with a split of these amounts between the ones that originate from commercial activities and the ones that originate from non-commercial activities.
Oma teatises esitas Ühendkuningriik komisjonile teavet NDAle üleantavate tuumarajatiste kohustuste ja varade hinnangulise suuruse kohta, jaotatuna äritegevusest saadavateks ja mittetulunduslikust tegevusest saadavateks summadeks.
All liabilities linked to UKAEA sites were viewed as non-commercial in the Opening of Procedure.
Menetluse alguses käsitati kõiki UKAEA rajatistega seotud kohustusi mittetulunduslikust tegevusest tulenevate kohustustena.
In order to estimate the share of the liabilities linked to BNFL sites that originate from non-commercial activities, the United Kingdom had taken the approach that only financial liabilities still recognised by either the Ministry of Defence (MOD) or the UKAEA were non-commercial.
BNFLi rajatistega seotud mittetulunduslikust tegevusest tulenevate kohustuste suuruse hindamisel lähtus Ühendkuningriik seisukohast, et mittetulunduslikuks saab pidada vaid finantskohustusi, mida on tunnustanud kaitseministeerium või UKAEA.
Liabilities linked to assets with dual (commercial/non-commercial) use which were still not recognised by either the MOD or the UKAEA were attributed to BNFL's commercial activities, since BNFL was the operator and owner of these assets, even if they had been used by the MOD or UKAEA in the past.
Kahesuguseks kasutuseks (äritegevuseks või mittetulunduslikuks tegevuseks) mõeldud varadega seotud kohustusi, mida ei ole tunnustanud kaitseministeerium ega UAEA, peetakse BNFLi äritegevusest tulenevateks isegi siis, kui kaitseministeerium või UKAEA neid varem kasutas, kuna nende varade kasutaja ja omanik oli BNFL.
The estimated liabilities associated with sites then owned by BNFL, split between commercial and non-commercial activities, was as follows:
BNFLile kuulunud rajatistega seotud kohustuste hinnanguline suurus, jaotatuna äritegevusest tulenevateks ja mittetulunduslikeks, oli järgmine:
Nuclear Liabilities to be transferred to the NDA, estimates as of March 2003, 2003 prices, discounted at 5.4 % nominal, amounts in billion GBP [4].
NDAle üleantavate tuumarajatiste kohustuste hinnanguline suurus 2003. aasta märtsi seisuga, 2003. aasta hinnad, mis on diskonteeritud nominaalmääraga 5,4 %, summad on miljardites Inglise naelades [4]
Non-commercial
Mittetulunduslik tegevus
Commercial
Äritegevus
Total Liabilities
Kohustused kokku
Magnox stations sites (except Calder Hall/Chapelcross)
Magnox-jaamad (v.a Calder Hall/Chapelcross)
Sellafield site (except Calder Hall station)
Sellafieldi rajatis (v.a Calder Halli jaam)
Springfields site
Springfieldsi rajatis
Capenhurst site
Capenhursti rajatis
The following table was also provided by the United Kingdom authorities in their notification.
Ühendkuningriigi ametiasutused esitasid oma teatises ka järgmise tabeli.
It compared the estimated value of the commercial part of the liabilities linked to sites to be transferred to the NDA by BNFL and the economic value of the assets to be transferred to the NDA along with these sites.
Selles võrreldakse BNFLi poolt NDAle üleantavate rajatistega seotud äritegevusest tulenevate kohustuste hinnangulist suurust ja koos nende rajatistega NDAle üleantavate varade majanduslikku väärtust.
For physical assets, the economic value was considered to be equal to the cash flows that their continued operation was expected to generate.
Materiaalse põhivara majanduslikku väärtust peetakse võrdseks rahavooga, mida selle käigushoidmisega eeldati.
Magnox stations future cash flows
Magnox-jaamade tulevased rahavood
Sellafield operations cash flow (THORP & SMP)
Rahavoog Sellafieldi käitamise eest (THORP & SMP)
Springfields future cash flows
Springfieldsi oodatavad rahavood
Nuclear Liabilities Investment Portfolio
Tuumarajatiste kohustusi hõlmav investeerimisportfell
Magnox Undertaking
Magnox-kohustus
Other customer contributions not included above
Muud klientide sissemaksed, mida eespool nimetatu ei hõlma
Cash and liquid assets
Sularaha ja likviidsed varad
GROUNDS FOR OPENING THE PROCEDURE
MENETLUSE ALGATAMISE ALUS
In the Opening of Procedure, the Commission first raised doubts as to which entity would be in receipt of State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Menetluse alguses kaalus komisjon esmalt seda, milline üksus saab riigiabi EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 87 lõike 1 tähenduses.
The Commission took account not only of the situation of the NDA, which might receive direct payments from the State, but also that of BNFL, which could be relieved of charges that it might otherwise have had to bear under the polluter-pays principle.
Komisjon võttis arvesse nii NDA olukorda, kes võib saada riigilt otsetoetusi, kui ka BNFLi olukorda, keda võidakse vabastada tasudest, mida ta peaks maksma, kui ta lähtub põhimõttest, et saastaja maksab.
The Commission then analysed whether such State aid could be found compatible with the EC Treaty.
Seejärel analüüsis komisjon seda, kas selline riigiabi oleks EÜ asutamislepinguga kooskõlas.
It expressed serious doubts that this aid was compatible under the guidelines on State aid for environmental protection.
Ta kahtles tõsiselt selles, kas kõnealune abi on kooskõlas suunistega keskkonnakaitsele antava riigiabi kohta.
It also expressed serious doubts that the aid could be found compatible with the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing or restructuring firms in difficulty.
Ta avaldas tõsist kahtlust ka selles, kas abi oleks kooskõlas ühenduse suunistega raskustes olevate äriühingute päästmiseks ja ümberkorraldamiseks antava riigiabi kohta.
The Commission then assessed whether such State aid could be found compatible in direct application of Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, and in the light of the objectives of the Euratom Treaty.
Seejärel hindas komisjon seda, kas kõnealune riigiabi oleks kooskõlas EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 87 lõike 3 punkti c vahetu kohaldamisega ja Euratomi asutamislepingu eesmärkidega.
The Commission took the view that such an approach could indeed be undertaken in principle, but also expressed doubts that the United Kingdom authorities had submitted sufficient proof that the positive impact of the aid on fulfilling the objectives of the Euratom Treaty outweighed its negative impact on competition in the internal market.
Komisjon oli arvamusel, et põhimõtteliselt võiks lähtuda ka sellest seisukohast, kuid kahtles tõsiselt, kas Ühendkuningriigi ametiasutused olid esitanud piisavad tõendid selle kohta, et Euratomi asutamislepingu eesmärkide saavutamiseks saadava abi positiivne mõju kaalub üles selle negatiivse mõju siseturul valitsevale konkurentsile.
Finally, the Commission raised doubts about the possible absence of State aid due to the fact that, before actual competitive procedures can take place, BNFL would act as SLC on a temporary basis.
Komisjon avaldas lõpuks kahtlust ka selles, kas tegemist on riigiabiga, kuna enne tegeliku pakkumismenetluse korraldamist tegutseb BNFL ajutiselt rajatise haldajana.
Following the publication of the Opening of Procedure, and within the deadline laid down by that publication, the Commission received comments from three third parties.
Pärast menetluse algatamise teatise avaldamist sai komisjon selles määratud tähtajaks märkusi kolmelt huvitatud isikult.
They are summarised below:
Kokkuvõtted nende kohta on esitatud allpool:
EDF supports the general orientation of the Measure.
EDF toetab kõnealuse meetme üldist suunitlust.
It considers that it contributes to the achievement of the objectives of the Euratom Treaty.
EDFi arvates aitab see kaasa Euratomi asutamislepingu eesmärkide saavutamisele.
It considers that it is necessary to establish proper conditions for the final disposal of nuclear waste.
Ta on arvamusel, et seda on vaja, et luua sobivaid tingimusi tuumajäätmete lõplikuks kõrvaldamiseks.
As regards the financing of the decommissioning of nuclear sites, EDF considers that financial and industrial responsibility must go together and that proper funds must be set aside and secured during operation time.
Tuumarajatiste likvideerimise rahastamist silmas pidades arvab EDF, et finants- ja tootmisalast vastutust tuleb kanda koos ning sobivad vahendid tuleb eraldada ja tagada tegutsemise käigus.
EDF supports the Commission's actions to set up a Community-wide framework for solving such problems, and welcomes the fact that the Commission takes account of the Euratom Treaty in the matter.
EDF toetab komisjoni astutud samme kogu ühendust hõlmava raamistiku loomiseks, et lahendada selliseid probleeme ning tervitab asjaolu, et komisjon võtab kõnealuses asjas arvesse Euratomi asutamislepingut.
BE welcomes the establishment of the NDA.
BE tervitab NDA asutamist.
It does not see the Measure as likely to have anti-competitive effects in its regard.
Ta ei arva, et meetmel võib olla konkurentsivastaseid mõjusid.
BE points out that it is also a customer of BNFL's current fuel supply and waste management activities.
BE märgib, et ta on ka BNFLi praeguse kütusetarne- ja jäätmekäitlusteenuse tarbija.
After the transfer of these activities to the NDA and the tendering of their operation by the authority, it may well be that one of the selected new operators will be a competitor of BE.
Pärast nende tegevuste üleandmist NDAle ja nende tegevuste teostamiseks pakkumise korraldamist ametiasutuste poolt võib üks valitud uutest ettevõtjatest olla BE konkurent.
BE is concerned by this situation where it could end up being a customer of one of its competitors.
BE on mures olukorra pärast, kus ta võib saada ühe oma konkurendi kliendiks.
BE also draws the Commission's attention to the fact that the setting up of the NDA and its analysis by the Commission should not endanger its own restructuring plan, as approved by the Commission.
BE pöörab komisjoni tähelepanu ka asjaolule, et NDA asutamine ja selle analüüsimine ei tohiks ohustada tema enda ümberkorraldamiskava, mille on komisjon heaks kiitnud.
BE goes on to explain that it does not believe that the Measure has any impact on trade as regards the supply of AGR fuel and reprocessing of AGR spent fuel because, even if BNFL's only EU competitor, AREVA, were to settle in the United Kingdom, BE would not be in a position to switch to it because it already has arrangements with BNFL for the lifetime requirements of its AGR stations.
BE selgitab, et ei usu, et meede mõjutab gaasijahutusega reaktorite kütusevarude ja gaasijahutusega reaktorites kasutatud kütuse ümbertöötamisega seotud kaubandust, sest isegi juhul, kui AREVA, BNFLi ainus konkurent Euroopa Liidus, hakkaks tegutsema Ühendkuningriigis, ei saaks BE BNFLi selle vastu välja vahetada, kuna ta on juba sõlminud kokkulepped BNFLiga gaasijahutusega reaktorite tööeaga seotud tarbe rahuldamiseks.
As regards Magnox power plants and the electricity market, BE believes that the Measure, even if it reduces BNFL's power plants' Short Run Marginal Costs (SRMCs), cannot have an effect on the price at which BE can sell its own nuclear and fossil output.
Magnox-elektrijaamu ja elektrienergiaturgu arvesse võttes usub BE, et meede ei saa mõjutada hinda, millega BE saab müüa oma tuumaenergiat ja fossiilenergiat isegi juhul, kui meede vähendab BNFLi elektrijaamade lühiajalisi piirkulusid.
Based on its own experience, BE also believes that the Measure will not artificially prolong the lifetime of BNFL's plants, since, still according to BE's estimates, these power plants should reasonably be in a position to cover their SRMCs.
Oma kogemuse põhjal usub BE ka seda, et meede ei pikenda kunstlikult BNFLi jaamade eluiga, kuna BE arvestuste kohaselt peaksid need elektrijaamad olema sellises seisukorras, et suudavad katta oma lühiajalisi piirkulusid.
BE gives its view of the interactions between the EC and Euratom Treaties.
BE esitab ka oma seisukoha EÜ asutamislepingu ja Euratomi asutamislepingu vahelise seose kohta.