natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, no valid business plan had been presented to the Commission’s services that demonstrated that company D’s production lines were being installed at the premises of company E.
Veelgi enam, komisjonile ei esitatud ka toimivat äriplaani, mis näitaks, et äriühing D tootmisliinid on paigaldatud äriühingusse E.
It is Community practice that manufacturers that definitively cease their production during or after the end of the IP should not be included in the definition of Community industry within the meaning of Article 4 of the basic Regulation.
Ühenduse tava näeb ette, et äriühinguid, mis uurimisperioodi jooksul või selle järel lõpetavad tootmise, ei kuulu ühenduse tootmisharu mõiste alla algmääruse artikli 4 tähenduses.
Consequently, company D’s production should be excluded from the definition of the Community production as company D’s production lines closed definitely after the end of IP and it has not been demonstrated that these production lines are again being utilized.
Järelikult tuleb äriühingu D toodang ühenduse toodangu määratlusest välja jätta, kuna äriühingu D tootmisliinid peatati lõplikult pärast uurimisperioodi ning ei ole tõestatud, et need tootmisliinid uuesti kasutusse võetakse.
CDA & BOC SA
CDA ja BOC SA
Subsequent to the publication of the notice of initiation, two further companies, CDA and BOC SA, informed the Commission that they had ceased their production within the Community for the foreseeable future.
Pärast algatamisteatise avaldamist teatasid veel kaks ettevõtet, CDA ja BOC SA, komisjonile, et on lõpetanud tootmise ühenduse territooriumil.
Consequently, CDA and BOC SA were excluded from the definition of the Community industry and their production was excluded from the definition of Community production.
Sellest tulenevalt arvati CDA ja BOC SA ühenduse tootmisharu määratlusest välja ja nende toodang arvati välja ühenduse toodangu määratlusest.
Other Community producers
Teised ühenduse tootjad
The complainant had provided a list of 13 other producers in the Community.
Kaebusele oli lisatud nimekiri veel 13 ühenduses tegutsevast tootjast.
With the exception of BOC SA, none of these producers have co-operated during the investigation.
Peale BOC SA ei olnud ükski nendest tootjatest uurimise ajal koostööd teinud.
Nevertheless, they should be accounted for when defining Community production.
Sellegipoolest tuleb ühenduse toodangut määratledes nendega arvestada.
On the basis of information in the complaint, the production of these companies has been estimated to be around 264 Mio Units (for calendar year 2004).
Kaebuses esitatud andmete põhjal on nende ettevõtete toodang hinnanguliselt 264 miljonit ühikut (2004. kalendriaastal).
Recent information by the complainant suggests that at least four of those other Community producers ceased their production during or after the end of the IP.
Kaebuse esitaja viimati saadetud teabest selgub, et vähemalt neli nendest muudest ühenduse tootjatest lõpetas tootmistegevuse uurimisperioodil või pärast selle lõppu.
As stated above, manufacturers that definitively cease their production during or after the end of the IP should not be included in the definition of the Community industry.
Nagu eespool sätestatud, ei määratleta tootjaid, kes uurimisperioodi ajal või pärast seda tootmisest lõplikult loobuvad, ühenduse tootmisharuna.
Consequently, also the production of these four companies should be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Järelikult jääb ka nende ettevõtete toodang välja ühenduse toodangu määratlusest.
To conclude, Community production of CD-Rs within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation has been defined as:
Kokkuvõtteks: algmääruse artikli 4 lõike 1 tähenduses määratleti ühenduse CD-R-de toodang järgmiselt
CD-Rs produced by the original 20 companies listed in recital (28), minus
CD-R-d, mille on tootnud 20 ettevõtet, kes kuuluvad põhjenduste punktis 28 esitatud nimekirja, välja arvatud
the CD-Rs produced by the three companies which, as described in recitals (29) to (44) , have been excluded for reasons of imports, and
CD-R-d, mille on tootnud kolm tootjat, kes vastavalt põhjenduste punktides 29 kuni 44 esitatud kirjeldustele on impordi tõttu välja jäetud; ja
the output of the three cooperating companies which, as described in recitals (45) to (51) have been excluded as their production within the Community ceased,
kolme koostööd tegeva äriühingu toodang, kes vastavalt põhjenduste punktides 45 kuni 51 esitatud kirjeldusele on välja jäetud, kuna nende tootmistegevus ühenduses on lõpetatud;
the output of the four non-cooperating companies which, as described in recitals (52) to (55) have been excluded as their production within the Community ceased.
nelja koostööd mittetegeva äriühingu toodang, kes vastavalt põhjenduse punktides 52 kuni 55 esitatud kirjeldusele on välja jäetud, kuna nende tootmine ühenduses on lõpetatud.
The total production of those remaining 10 producers, which constitute Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, has been estimated to be 168 Mio units during the IP.
Ülejäänud algmääruse artikli 4 lõike 1 tähenduses ühenduse toodangu moodustava kümne tootja kogutoodang oli uurimisperioodil hinnanguliselt 168 miljonit ühikut.
Definition of Community Industry
Ühenduse tootmisharu mõiste
It follows from recital (57) above that Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation was constituted by the 10 producers whose collective output was estimated to 168 Mio Units.
Eespool esitatud põhjendusest 57 järeldub, et algmääruse artikli 4 lõike 1 järgi koosneb ühenduse toodang kümne tootja toodangust, kelle toodang on kokku hinnanguliselt 168 miljonit ühikut.
Moreover, it follows from recital (28) and the recitals thereafter that the sole Community producer which has cooperated with the Commission in the investigation was Manufacturing Advanced Media (‘MAM-E’).
Lisaks järeldub põhjendusest 28 ja ka järgmistest põhjendustest, et ainus ühenduse tootja, kes on komisjoniga uurimise käigus koostööd teinud, oli Manufacturing Advanced Media (edaspidi MAM-E).
The collective output of this company amounted to more than 50 % of the Community production.
Selle äriühingu kogutoodang moodustab rohkem kui 50 % ühenduse toodangust.
This company can therefore be considered to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Seetõttu võib seda ettevõtet lugeda algmääruse artikli 4 lõike 1 ja artikli 5 lõike 4 järgi ühenduse tootmisharu moodustajaks.
Statistics on imports of CD-Rs are included in Eurostat under CN Code 85239000.
CD-R-de impordi statistikat hõlmab Eurostat CN koodiga 85239000.
However, included in the same CN Code are also other recordable media products such as DVD-R, CD-Rom etc. Moreover, imports under CN Code 85239000 are recorded in kilos, whereas CD-Rs are recorded by all interested parties as being produced and sold in units.
Seejuures on sama CN koodi alla arvestatud ka muud salvestamist võimaldavad meediatooted, nagu DVD-R, CD-ROM jne. Veelgi enam, CN koodi 85239000 alla kuuluv toodang on registreeritud kilogrammides, samal ajal kui CD-R-de tootmist ja müüki registreerivad kõik osapooled tooteühikutes.
Thus, information statistics from Eurostat, without a further breakdown of the figures obtained, are not a reliable source of data.
Seega ei ole Eurostati statistilised andmed ilma saadud arvude rühmitamiseta usaldusväärne allikas.
Consequently, statistics were further broken down using a method suggested by the complainant and further corroborated by figures obtained during the investigation, i.e. exporters’ data and other sources in order to ensure that the figures are as complete and accurate as possible.
Sellest tulenevalt rühmitati statistikat veelgi üksikasjalikumalt, kasutades kaebuse esitaja soovitatud meetodit ning seda kinnitati uurimise käigus kogutud arvude abil, st eksportija andmete ja teiste allikate abil, et tagada võimalikult täielikud ja täpsed arvud.
Data on Community production
Andmed ühenduse toodangu kohta
Community industry data were obtained from the verified questionnaires of the sole cooperating Community producer that constitutes the Community industry.
Ühenduse tootmisharu andmed saadi ainsale koostööd tegevale ühenduse tootjale, kes ühtlasi moodustab ühenduse tootmisharu, saadetud küsimustiku kinnitatud vastustest.
Further information on Community production was derived from the questionnaire responses from the companies which have been excluded from the definition of Community production, and also from data contained in the complaint.
Täiendav teave ühenduse toodangu kohta tuletati ühenduse toodangu määratlusest välja arvatud ettevõtete esitatud vastustest ning samuti kaebustes sisalduvatest andmetest.
Thus, the consumption in the Community was established on the basis of:
Ühenduse tarbimine tuvastati seega järgneva põhjal:
the total imports of the product concerned into the Community as reported by Eurostat and converted into units,
vaatlusaluse toote import ühenduse territooriumile vastavalt Eurostati aruannetele, teisendatuna tooteühikutesse;
the total verified sales on the Community market by the Community industry,
ühenduse tootmisharu kinnitatud kogumüük ühenduse turul;
the total sales on the Community market by other cooperating manufacturers in the Community,
ühenduse teiste koostööd tegevate tootjate kogumüük ühenduse turul;
the total estimated sales on the Community market by the other manufacturers in the Community in operation.
teiste ühenduses tegutsevate tootjate hinnanguline kogumüük ühenduse turul.
On this basis, Community consumption developed as follows:
Selle järgi on ühenduse tarbimine järgmine:
Mio Units
Miljonit ühikut
Over the period considered consumption in the Community decreased by 3 %.
Vaatlusalusel perioodil vähenes tarbimine ühenduses 3 %.
Consumption peaked in 2003.
Tipptasemel oli tarbimine 2003. aastal.
Since then, Community consumption has decreased by 7 percentage points.
Alates sellest ajast on ühenduse tarbimine kahanenud 7 protsendipunkti võrra.
Cumulative assessment of the effects of the dumped imports from the countries concerned
Kumulatiivne hinnang asjaomastest riikidest pärineva dumpinguhinnaga impordi mõjudele
The Commission considered whether the effects of the dumped imports from the countries concerned should be assessed cumulatively, on the basis of the criteria set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisjon kaalus, kas asjaomastest riikidest pärineva dumpinguhinnaga impordi mõjusid tuleks hinnata kumulatiivselt, vastavalt algmääruse artikli 3 lõikes 4 sätestatud kriteeriumidele.
This Article provides that the effects of imports from two or more countries simultaneously subject to anti-dumping investigations shall be assessed cumulatively if it is determined that:
Selles artiklis nähakse ette, et samaaegselt dumpinguvastase uurimise aluseks oleva kahest või enamast riigist pärineva impordi mõju tuleks hinnata kumulatiivselt, kui on kindlaks tehtud, et:
the margin of dumping established in relation to the imports from each country is more than de minimis as defined in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation,
kindlaks määratud dumpingumarginaal iga riigi impordi suhtes on suurem kui algmääruse artikli 9 lõikes 3 kehtestatud miinimumtase;
the volume of imports from each of the countries concerned is not negligible,
import igast asjaomasest riigist ei ole tühine;
a cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports is appropriate in the light of the conditions of competition between imported products and the conditions of competition between the imported product and the like Community product.
impordi mõjude kumulatiivne hindamine on kohane, arvestades imporditud toote ja samasuguse ühenduse toote konkurentsitingimusi.
It was first found that the dumping margins established for each of the countries concerned was more than de minimis.
Esiteks tuvastati, et iga asjaomase riigi puhul kindlaks määratud dumpingumarginaalid ületavad miinimumtaset.
Second, the investigation showed that the conditions of competition between the product concerned and the Community like product sold were similar as demonstrated by the fact that the CD-Rs imported from the countries concerned were alike in all respects, they are interchangeable and are marketed in the Community through comparable sales channels and under similar commercial conditions, thus competing with each other and with the CD-Rs produced in the Community.
Teiseks näitas uurimine, et vaatlusaluse toote ja samasuguse ühenduse toote müügil olid konkurentsitingimused sarnased, nagu näitas ka asjaolu, et asjaomastest riikidest imporditud CD-R-d olid igas mõttes sarnased, vastastikku asendatavad ja neid turustati ühenduses sarnaste müügikanalite kaudu ja samasugustel kaubandustingimustel, seega konkureerisid nad nii omavahel kui ka ühenduses toodetud CD-R-dega.
The volume of imports from each country concerned was also found to be above the threshold of 1 % market share set by Article 5(7) of the basic Regulation.
Samuti leiti, et igast asjaomasest riigist saabuva impordi maht on üle algmääruse artikli 5 lõikes 7 kehtestatud 1 % piiri.
The import prices of the product concerned from all of the countries concerned had followed a similar decreasing trend throughout the period considered.
Vaatlusaluse toote impordihind kõikidest asjaomastest riikidest on jälgitaval perioodil järginud samasugust langustrendi.
Moreover, the users (distributors and retailers) were the same.
Lisaks olid tarbijad (levitajad ja jaemüüjad) samad.
Consequently, it was concluded that a cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports was appropriate and in accordance with Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.
Seega jõuti järeldusele, et impordi mõjude kumulatiivne hindamine on asjakohane ning kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 3 lõikega 4.
Import volumes and market shares from the countries concerned
Asjaomastest riikidest pärit impordi maht ja turuosa
On the basis of Eurostat statistics, the import volumes have developed as follows during the period considered:
Eurostati statistika näitab, et impordikogused on vaatlusalusel ajavahemikul olnud järgmised:
Countries concerned
Asjaomased riigid kokku
The imports from the countries concerned as well as their market shares have steadily increased during the period considered.
Import asjaomastest riikidest, samuti impordi turuosa on uurimisperioodil stabiilselt kasvanud.
From a market share of 21 % during the first year in the period considered, the market share has more than doubled to 48 % during the IP.
Uurimisperioodi jooksul on turuosa rohkem kui kahekordistunud, jõudes esimese aasta 21 %-lt 48 %-le.
Average prices and level of undercutting of imports from the countries concerned
Asjaomastest riikidest pärit impordi keskmised hinnad ja hindade allalöömise tase
The average price level and level of undercutting of the Community industry’s sales prices for the IP has thus been calculated on the basis of information gathered from co-operating exporters.
Ühenduse tootmisharu müügihindade keskmine hinna- ja hindade allalöömise tase uurimisperioodi jooksul on välja arvutatud koostöövalmis eksportijatelt saadud teabe põhjal.
Average level of undercutting
Hindade allalöömise keskmine tase
It follows from above that imports from Hong Kong and the PRC were found to undercut the Community industry’s sales prices by 69,7 % and 43,9 %, whereas for Malaysia no undercutting was found.
Ülaltoodust järeldub, et import Hongkongist ja Hiina Rahvavabariigist lööb ühenduse tootmisharu müügihindu alla 69,7 % ja 43,9 % ulatuses, samas Malaisia puhul seda ei täheldatud.
The investigation established the existence of material injury for the sole Community producer constituting the definition of the Community industry.
Uurimisel tuvastati ühenduse tootmisharu definitsiooni aluseks olevale ainsale ühenduse tootjale tekitatud materiaalne kahju.
In accordance with Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the material injury suffered by the Community industry had been caused by the dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Vastavalt algmääruse artikli 3 lõikele 6 kontrolliti, kas ühenduse tootmisharule tekitatud materiaalne kahju on põhjustatud dumpinguhinnaga impordist asjaomastest riikidest.
In accordance with Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission also examined other factors which might have injured the Community industry in order to ensure that any injury caused by those factors was not attributed to the dumped imports.
Vastavalt algmääruse artikli 3 lõikele 7 kontrollis komisjon ühtlasi teisi tegureid, mis võiksid ühenduse tootmisharu kahjustada, tagamaks, et nende asjaolude tõttu tekkinud kahjulikku mõju ei seostata dumpinguhinnaga impordiga.
Effects of the dumped imports from the countries concerned
Asjaomastest riikidest saabunud dumpinguhinnaga impordi mõju
It follows from recital (69) that the volume of imports from the PRC, Malaysia and Hong Kong has increased by 117 % during the period considered, representing an increase in market share from 21 % in 2002 to 48 % during the IP.
Põhjendusest 69 järeldub, et Hiina Rahvavabariigist, Malaisiast ja Hongkongist saabuva impordi maht on vaatlusalusel perioodil 117 % kasvanud, mis tähendab turuosa kasvu 21 %-lt 2002. aastal 48 %-le uurimisperioodi jooksul.
In recital (72), it was established that that the imports originating in the PRC and Hong Kong, have undercut the Community industry’s prices by 43,9 % and 69,7 % respectively, whereas for Malaysia no undercutting was found.
Põhjendusest 72 selgub, et import Hiina Rahvavabariigist ja Hongkongist on ühenduse tootmisharu müügihindu alla löönud vastavalt 43,9 % ja 69,7 %, samas Malaisia puhul seda ei täheldatud.
It was further concluded in recital (73) that the Community industry has suffered material injury and it appears that the injurious situation coincides in time with the increase in volumes of dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Põhjenduses 73 järeldati, et ühenduse tootmisharu on saanud materiaalset kahju, ja ilmneb, et selle kahju tekkimine langeb ajaliselt kokku dumpinguhinnaga impordi mahu suurenemisega asjaomastest riikidest.
Given this coincidence in time between the increased imports at dumped prices and the deterioration of the situation of the Community industry, it can be concluded that the dumped imports have had a direct effect on this situation.
Arvestades dumpinghinnaga impordi suurenemise ajalist kokkulangemist ühenduse tootmisharu seisukorra halvenemisega, võib teha järelduse, et dumpinguhinnaga import on seda olukorda otseselt mõjutanud.
It has been alleged that some of the injury suffered by the Community industry has been caused by imports from other third countries.
On väidetud, et teatud ulatuses põhjustas ühenduse tootmisharule tekkinud kahju import muudest kolmandatest riikidest.
Based on this allegation, the overall volume of imports from other third countries below has been obtained from Eurostat using the breakdown method referred to in recital (62) above:
Selle väite põhjal muretseti Eurostatilt põhjenduses 62 nimetatud meetodit rakendades andmed allpool loetletud muudest kolmandatest riikidest saabuva impordi kogumahu kohta:
Third country: India
Kolmas riik: India
Third country: Taiwan
Kolmas riik: Taiwan
Total third countries
Kolmandad riigid kokku
It follows from the above that the overall volumes of imports from other third countries have decreased from 67 % of Community consumption to 37 % of Community consumption, or by 30 percentage points.
Ülalpool toodust järeldub, et muudest kolmandatest riikidest saabuva impordi kogumaht on vähenenud 67 %-lt ühenduse tarbimismahust 37 %-le ühenduse tarbimismahust ehk ligikaudu 30 protsendipunkti võrra.
However, among the different exporting third countries, divergent developments were found.
Siiski on ilmnenud erinevusi muude eksportivate kolmandate riikide näitajate seas.
These warranted a closer individual analysis of the largest amongst these, namely Taiwan and India.
See andis aluse analüüsida põhjalikumalt kahte suuremat, nimelt Taiwanit ja Indiat.
In this respect, the import statistics for Taiwan and India also have been cross-checked with information obtained from co-operating importers.
Seda arvestades on Taiwanist ja Indiast saabuva impordi statistika koostööd tegevatelt importijatelt saadud andmete põhjal üle kontrollitud.
Following the introduction of anti-dumping measures, imports from Taiwan have almost disappeared from the Community market.
Pärast dumpinguvastaste meetmete rakendamist on import Taiwanist ühenduse turult peaaegu kadunud.
Information in the complaint suggests that, following the introduction of these measures in December 2001, the Taiwanese exporting producers relocated some of their production lines to other countries, including the PRC.
Kaebuses esitatud teabest selgub, et pärast nende meetmete rakendamist 2001. aasta detsembris viisid Taiwani eksportijad oma tootmisliinid üle teistesse maadesse, sealhulgas Hiina Rahvavabariiki.
This can be an explanation of the drop in import volumes from Taiwan and the corresponding increase of import volumes from the PRC.
See võib olla Taiwanist saabuva impordi mahu kahanemise ja vastavalt Hiina Rahvavabariigist saabuva impordi mahu suurenemise põhjuseks.
It is recalled that an anti-dumping investigation on imports of CD-Rs from India was terminated in May 2003 due to the absence of dumping.
Indiast pärit CD-R-de impordi dumpinguvastane uurimine lõpetati 2003. aasta mais, kuna dumpingut ei tuvastatud.
It is also recalled that following an anti-subsidy investigation, a countervailing duty of 7,3 % was imposed on imports of CD-Rs originating in India.
Sellele järgnenud subsiidiumivastase uurimise tulemusel kehtestati Indiast pärit CD-R-de impordile 7,3 % tasakaalustav tollimaks.
Nevertheless, imports from India increased considerably between 2002 and 2004, increasing their market share from 20 % to 34 %.
Sellegipoolest kasvas import Indiast 2002.–2004. a märgatavalt, suurendades nende turuosa 20 %-lt 34 %-le.
During the IP, the market share decreased slightly.
Uurimisperioodi jooksul turuosa pisut vähenes.
Still, imports originating from India play a major role in the Community market of CD-Rs.
Siiski on ühenduse CD-R-de turul Indiast saabuval impordil oluline osa.
Moreover, based on information from cooperating importers, the average import price from India is around 12,7 EUR-cents/unit (DDP).
Koostööd tegevatelt importijatelt saadud teabest lähtuvalt on Indiast saabuva importtoote keskmine hind ligikaudu 12,7 eurosenti ühikult (DDP).
Comparing this price of Indian imports with the price at which the same co-operating importers purchased the product concerned from the PRC, this comparison shows that imports from India were at the same price level as imports from the PRC.
Võrreldes India impordihinda sellega, millega samad koostööd tegevad importijad tarnisid vaatlusalust toodet Hiina Rahvavabariigist, selgub, et import Indiast oli samal hinnatasemel kui import Hiina Rahvavabariigist.
Consequently, imports from India have undercut the Community industry with a percentage level equivalent to that of imports from the PRC (43,9 %) Thus, it cannot be excluded that imports from India have contributed to the difficult financial situation of the Community industry.
Järelikult on import Indiast kahjustanud ühenduse tootmisharu samas mahus kui import Hiina Rahvavabariigist (43,9 %). Seega ei saa välistada, et import Indiast on samuti põhjustanud ühenduse tootmisharu rahaliste raskuste tekke.
Decrease in overall consumption
Tarbimise üldine vähenemine
It follows from recital (66) that consumption of CD-Rs has decreased by 7 % since 2003.
Vastavalt põhjendusele 66 on CD-R-de tarbimine alates 2003. aastast 7 % vähenenud.
It has been examined whether this decrease may have been a reason for the injury suffered by the Community industry.
On uuritud, kas ühenduse tootmisharus tekkinud raskused võivad olla põhjustatud tarbimise vähenemisest.
To this end, a comparison between the development of sales on the EC market by the Community industry and the overall development of Community consumption was made.
Sellega seoses võrreldi ühenduse tootmisharu müügi suundumusi EL-i turul ja ühenduse üldise tarbimise suundumusi.