natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As in the turnkey market, ABB and Areva accounted for the remaining EEA market share.
%–[40–50] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga. ). Samamoodi kui käivitusvalmis seadmete turu puhul jäid ülejäänud EMP turuosad ABBle ja Arevale.
Although the safety-critical nature of HV products limits the number of eligible suppliers to European electricity operators, there appears to be little product differentiation between the equipment supplied by the four market leaders for a given tender specification.
Kõrgepingetoodete ohutusnõuded piiravad Euroopa energiavarustajate võimalike tarnijate arvu, kusjuures nelja turuliidri konkreetse hankekonkurssi jaoks tarnitud seadmetel on ilmselgelt väga väikesed tooteerinevused.
Based on these characteristics (bidding market, little product differentiation among the majors), the GIS/HV-turnkey markets could in principle produce competitive outcomes, even with only three credible competitors.
Nende asjaolude (pakkujate turg, väikesed tooteerinevused turuliidrite vahel) tõttu suudavad gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate/käivitusvalmis seadmete kõrgepingeturud põhimõtteliselt ka ainult kolme usaldusväärse pakkujaga saavutada konkurentsivõimelisi tulemusi.
The market investigation examined bidding lists for HV-turnkey projects, GIS and circuit breakers supplied by Siemens and data from competitors covering the periods from 1999 to date.
Turu-uuringus uuriti kõrgepingeprojektide, gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate ja pingelülitite pakkujate nimekirju ning Siemensi ja konkurentide esitatud andmeid alates 1999. aastast.
The data show that ABB was Siemens's most frequent competitor in tenders, followed by Areva.
Sellest selgub, et ABB oli hankekonkurssidel Siemensi kõige sagedam konkurent, talle järgnes Areva.
VA Tech participated less frequently in GIS tenders and rarely bid in competition with Siemens.
VA Tech osales gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate hankekonkurssidel harvemini ja ei esinenud neil pea kunagi Siemensi konkurendina.
One explanation for the rare encounter of Siemens and VA Tech may be that VA Tech's European GIS business originates from its takeover of Schneider's HV activities in Grenoble.
Siemensi ja VA Techi harva esinenud kokkupuute selgituseks võib olla asjaolu, et VA Techi Euroopa gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate äri sai alguse Schneideri kõrgepingetegevuse ülevõtmisest Grenoble’is.
VA Tech's installed base is therefore concentrated in France, whereas Siemens's traditional geographic strength has been elsewhere in Europe.
Tema loodud alus on seega kontsentreeritud Prantsusmaale, samas kui Siemensi esialgne geograafiline raskuspunkt asub Euroopa muudes piirkondades.
Ganz-Transelektro of Hungary has submitted several bids in the EEA since the country became an EU member.
Alates Ungari ELi liikmeks saamisest on Ganz-Transelektro esitanud EMPs mitu pakkumist.
It has recently won a GIS contract in the Netherlands (with Corus).
Talle ja Corusele anti hiljuti gaasisolatsiooniga jaotla tellimus Hollandis.
By contrast, the Japanese GIS manufacturers Toshiba-Mitsubishi (TM) and JAEPS have in the EEA limited their activities to tenders in the island states of Iceland and Cyprus.
Jaapani gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate tootjad Toshiba-Mitsubishi (TM) ja JAEPS on oma tegevuse EMPs piiranud saareriikide Islandi ja Küprose hankekonkurssidega.
The Commission also compared bids from […] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Komisjon võrdles omavahel […] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
tenders, where all four firms submitted bids, in order to verify whether any one firm frequently submitted the lowest or second-lowest bid.
pakkumisi hankekonkurssidel, kus osalesid kõik neli ettevõtjat, et kontrollida, kas mõni neist ettevõtjatest esitas sageli kõige madalama hinnaga või odavuselt teisel kohal oleva pakkumise.
This was not the case.
Seda ei esinenud.
As outlined in the Decision, the GIS market could potentially produce competitive outcomes even with three credible bidders, provided the merger does not involve the lowest and second-lowest-cost bidder or competitors who are particularly close substitutes by another dimension.
Nagu otsuses märgitakse, suudaks gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate turg leida konkurentsivõimelisi lahendusi ka vaid kolme usaldusväärse pakkujaga, tingimusel et koondumises ei osale kõige madalama hinnaga või odavuselt teisel kohal olevad pakkujad või konkurendid, kes mõnes muus suurusjärgus oleksid eriti lähedased asendajad.
The bidding data provided no indications to this effect.
Pakkujat olemasolevad andmed ei anna põhjust seda järeldada.
The Decision also examines the possibility that the notified transaction may lead to coordinated effects.
Otsuses uuritakse ka võimalust, kas kavatsus võiks kaasa tuua koordineeritud mõjusid.
However, it appears from the structure of the GIS, HV-turnkey and circuit-breaker markets (three close competitors, inhomogeneous products, large customers) and the observed bidding pattern (all competitors participate successfully in tenders throughout Europe) that any effective coordination mechanism in the GIS market would have to be highly elaborate and would be difficult to implement.
Gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate, käivitusvalmis kõrgepingeprojektide ja pingelülitite turgude struktuur (kolm lähimat konkurenti, mittehomogeensed tooted, suurostjad) ja kindlaksmääratud pakkujad (kõik konkurendid osalevad edukalt hankekonkurssidel kogu Euroopas) lubavad järeldada, et gaasisolatsiooniga jaotlate turul oleks tõhusa koordineerimismehhanismi väljatöötamine keeruline ja selle ellurakendamine raske.
The Decision concludes that no significant impediment to effective competition arises in the T&D market under any possible product market definition.
Otsuses jõutakse järeldusele, et olemasolevas energiaülekande- ja -jaotusturu konkurentsis ei ole tuntavaid takistusi ühegi võimaliku kindlaksmääratud tooteturu puhul.
RAIL TECHNOLOGY
RAUDTEETEHNIKA
RAIL ROLLING STOCK
RAUDTEEVEEREM
The takeover of VA Tech leads to the disappearance of VA Tech Elin EBG Traction (ETR) as an independent supplier of electrical traction for trams, metros and regional trains.
VA Techi ülevõtmine toob kaasa VA Tech Elin EBG-Tractioni (ETR) äralangemise trammide, metroorongide ja kohalike rongide elektriajamite sõltumatu pakkujana.
ETR is also a supplier to integrated manufacturers of rolling stock, forming consortia for particular types of trams and trains with among others Bombardier and Siemens.
ETR tarnib tooteid ka raudteeveeremi integreeritud tootjatele, kes moodustavad spetsiaalsete trammi- ja rongitüüpide jaoks konsortsiume, kuhu kuuluvad muu hulgas Bombardier ja Siemens.
Following past cases the present Decision analyses the impact of the proposed transaction on the basis of an EEA market for electrical traction and national markets for rolling stock, separate for the various types of rolling stock, i.e. trams, metros, regional trains and locomotives in this case.
Vanematele otsustele tuginedes uuritakse selles otsuses kavatsuse mõjusid EMP elektriajamite turu ja raudteeveeremi siseriiklike turgude alusel erinevate sõidukitüüpide, nt trammide, metroorongide, kohalike rongide ja vedurite osas eraldi.
The overlap in the market for electrical traction is rather limited and does not lead to any competition concerns.
Elektriajamite turu kattumised on ebaolulised ning ei tekita konkurentsiprobleeme.
However, owing to ETR's and Siemens's position in some Member States there are vertically affected markets.
Arvestades ETRi ja Siemensi seisundit mõnes liikmesriigis, on siiski olemas vertikaalselt mõjutatud turgusid.
The market investigation showed that in the markets affected by the proposed transaction, i.e. trams in Spain, Poland, Austria and the Czech Republic, metros in Belgium and regional trains in Germany and Austria, sufficient competition will remain after the transaction.
Turu-uuring näitas, et turgudel, mida see kavatsus mõjutab, st trammid Hispaanias, Poolas, Austrias ja Tšehhi Vabariigis, metroorongid Belgias ning kohalikud rongid Saksamaal ja Austrias, säilib piisav konkurents ka pärast projekti elluviimist.
In order to sever the links between ETR and Bombardier created by Commission Decision COMP/M.2139 Bombardier/Adtranz of 3 April 2001, it is proposed to adopt in parallel an Article 8(2) decision cancelling one of the commitments given by Bombardier in that case should Siemens acquire sole control of VA Tech.
Selleks et katkestada ETRi ja Bombardier’ vahelisi sidemeid vastavalt komisjoni 3. aprilli 2001. aasta otsusele COMP/M.2139 Bombardier/Adtranz, tehakse ettepanek anda samaaegselt vastavalt artikli 8 lõikele 2 välja otsus, millega tühistatakse üks selle juhtumiga seoses Bombardier’ võetud kohustusest, kui Siemens peaks saama ainuisikulise kontrolli VA Techi üle.
That commitment obliges Bombardier to offer its CityRunner tram of the ‘Linz’ type only with traction by ETR.
See kohustab Bombardier’d pakkuma oma CityRunner-Linz-tüüpi trammi ainult koos ETRi ajamiga.
Secondly, there is the possibility for the non-integrated manufacturers to integrate within two to three years, as has been demonstrated by Stadler for trams and regional trains.
Teiseks on olemas võimalus, et integreerimata tootjad koonduvad kahe-kolme aasta jooksul, nagu see oli Stadleri puhul trammide ja kohalike rongide alal.
Thirdly, the integrated suppliers have, in the past, often teamed up with the non-integrated, and this option will remain as well.
Kolmas võimalus, et integreeritud ja integreerimata pakkujad ühinevad, nii nagu varem, jääb endiselt püsima.
Lastly, even if the non-integrated suppliers had to leave the market for electrically driven rolling stock, sufficient competition would remain in the market for rolling stock.
Siiski jääks ka tulevikus raudteeveeremi turule alles piisav konkurents, isegi kui integreerimata pakkujad lahkuksid elektriajamiga raudteeveeremi turult.
The Decision concludes that no significant impediment to effective competition arises in both the market for electrical traction and for trams, metros, regional trains and locomotives.
Otsuses jõutakse järeldusele, et kavatsus ei takistaks oluliselt elektriajamite ning trammide, metroorongide, kohalike rongide ja vedurite turu olemasolevat konkurentsi.
CATENARY WIRES
KONTAKTVÕRGUD
The Decision concludes that the question whether there is an overall market for all types of catenary wires or whether smaller product markets such as catenary wires for long-distance traffic exist can be left open.
Otsuses jõutakse järeldusele, et küsimus selle kohta, kas on olemas iga liiki kontaktvõrke hõlmav turg või on olemas väiksemad tooteturud, nt kaugliinide kontaktvõrgud, võib jääda lahtiseks.
The concentration leads to one affected national market.
Koondumine hõlmab ainult ühte siseriiklikku turgu.
In Germany, Siemens and VA Tech would have a combined market share of around [30-40] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Saksamaal oleks Siemensi ja VA Techi ühine turuosa ümmarguselt [30–40] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
% in the overall market, followed by Balfour Beatty with a similar share and five small competitors.
% koguturust, neile järgneksid Balfour Beatty peaaegu sama suure turuosaga ning viis väiksemat konkurenti.
On the basis of the market investigation the Commission concludes that there is no significant impediment to effective competition after the concentration.
Komisjon jõudis turu-uuringu põhjal järeldusele, et koondumine ei takistaks märkimisväärselt olemasolevat konkurentsi.
The same applies to the smaller possible product market of catenary wires for long-distance traffic since there is only one customer, the incumbent Deutsche Bahn, for the product for which there is an overlap, and at least four credible competitors.
Sama kehtib ka kaugliinide kontaktvõrkude väiksemate võimalike tooteturgude kohta, kus kattuvate toodete jaoks on olemas vaid üks klient, Deutsche Bahn, ning kus on vähemalt neli usaldusväärset konkurenti.
Moreover, it turned out that Siemens and VA Tech were rarely competing against each other.
Lisaks selgus, et Siemens ja VA Tech esinesid vaid harva teineteise konkurendina.
Lastly, tacit coordination between the merged entity and Balfour Beatty seems very unlikely since the market is declining year by year, and VA Tech cannot be described as the maverick which would be taken over and, therefore, make coordination easier.
Ka tuleb ebatõenäolisena vaadelda ühinenud ettevõtjate ja Balfour Beatty vahelist vaikivat leppimist, sest turg väheneb iga aastaga ning VA Techi ei saa vaadelda üksiküritajana, mida saaks üle võtta ning mis lihtsustaks koordineerimist.
The Decision concludes that no significant impediment to effective competition arises in the market for catenary wires.
Otsuses jõutakse järeldusele, et kontaktvõrguturu olemasoleval konkurentsil ei ole olulisi takistusi.
TRACTION POWER SUPPLY
RAUDTEE ELEKTRIVARUSTUS
Traction power supply concerns the supply of electricity into the catenary system of the railway operator through substations.
Raudtee elektrivarustus hõlmab operaatori kontaktvõrgu elektriga varustamist trafoalajaamade (toitepunktide) kaudu.
The Decision identified two product markets, one overall market for substations and a market for components.
Otsuses eristatakse kahte tooteturgu: trafoalajaamade koguturgu ja komponentide turgu.
In addition, there is an overlap in the market for the servicing of traction power generation stations in Germany.
Saksamaa raudtee elektrijaamade tehnohooldeturul on kattumine.
The concentration leads to two affected national markets for traction power supply.
Koondumine puudutab kahte raudtee elektrivarustuse siseriiklikku turgu.
In addition to Siemens/VA Tech, there are four internationally active credible suppliers, ABB, Areva, Balfour Beatty and SAG (RWE), which have market shares between 5 and 25 %, and some fringe players.
Siemensi/VA Techi kõrval on neli rahvusvaheliselt tegutsevat usaldusväärset pakkujat: ABB, Areva, Balfour Beatty ja SAG (RWE), kelle turuosad on vahemikus 5–25 %, ning mõned väiksemad pakkujad.
The demand side is highly concentrated: the national railway company ÖBB and Wiener Linien account for more than 90 % of demand in that rather small market, and use tenders.
Nõudlus on väga kontsentreeritud, üle 90 % nõudlusest langeb sellel suhteliselt väiksel turul, kus hankekonkursse korraldatakse, Österreichische Bundesbahnen’ile ja Wiener Linien’ile.
As a consequence, market shares in this bidding market vary a lot.
Seega tekib sellel pakkujate turul olulisi kõikumisi.
In Germany, Siemens and VA Tech would have a similarly high market share as in Austria.
Saksamaal oleks Siemensil ja VA Techil samuti suur turuosa ka nagu Austrias.
Competitors are ABB, Balfour Beatty, Elpro and Spitzke.
Konkurendid on ABB, Balfour Beatty, Elpro ja Spitzke.
VA Tech is almost exclusively active in the long-distance segment where there is one customer, Deutsche Bahn.
VA Tech tegutseb peaaegu eranditult kaugliinide segmendis, kus ainsaks kliendiks on Deutsche Bahn.
Given that this market is a bidding market with one powerful customer in the segment where the overlap is, there is no competition issue for entire substations for traction power supply.
Et tegemist on kattumisega, segmendi ühe võimsa kliendiga pakkujaturuga, ei teki raudtee elektrivarustuse trafoalajaamade osas konkurentsiküsimusi.
With regard to substation components it has been brought to the Commission's attention that the merged entity would become a monopolist for certain components with the potential to foreclose competitors.
Trafoalajaamade komponentide puhul juhiti komisjoni tähelepanu sellele, et ühinenud üksus saavutaks teatud komponentide alal monopoolse seisundi, kellel oleks potentsiaali konkurentide kõrvaldamiseks.
However, the market investigation showed that Siemens does not have any of the three components in question, there are other competitors for two of these components and that, for the one component where indeed VA Tech is the only supplier, the customer Deutsche Bahn played a very active part in getting it tested and ultimately approved by the regulator.
Turu-uuring näitas siiski, et Siemens ei paku ühtegi neist kolmest asjakohasest komponendist, et kahe nimetatud komponendi puhul on konkurent olemas ning et ühe komponendi puhul, mille ainus pakkuja on VA Tech, püüdis Deutsche Bahn neid reguleeriva asutuse kaudu aktiivselt kontrollida ja seejärel saada heakskiit.
The Decision concludes that no significant impediment to effective competition arises in the market for traction power supply.
Otsuses jõutakse järeldusele, et raudtee elektrivarustuse turu olemasolevat konkurentsi ei takistata märkimisväärselt.
The same is true for the servicing of traction power generation stations where VA Tech only supplied one of approximately 20 stations for which it is best placed to do also the servicing and since there are several credible alternatives to Siemens and VA Tech.
Sama kehtib raudtee elektrijaamade tehnohoolduse suhtes, kus VA Tech tarnis umbes 20 jaama, mida tal on kõige parem ise remontida, ning kuna Siemensile ja VA Techile on mitu usaldusväärset alternatiivi.
LEVEL CROSSINGS
RAUDTEEÜLETUSKOHAD
Both Siemens and VA Tech are suppliers of level crossings.
Nii Siemens kui VA Tech on raudteeületuskohtade pakkujad.
While VA Tech is active only in Austria, Siemens is not, but can be seen as a potential entrant.
VA Tech tegutseb ainult Austrias, Siemensit võib vaadelda potentsiaalse Austria turule sisenejana.
A customer raised the issue that after the merger Siemens might withdraw the VA Tech product and replace it with its own.
Üks klient esitas küsimuse, kas koondumise järel kõrvaldaks Siemens turult VA Techi toote ja asendaks selle oma pakkumisega.
However, the market investigation showed that VA Tech's product is owned by a German firm which has all the legal means to transfer the distribution rights to someone else if necessary.
Turu-uuring näitas siiski, et VA Techi toode kuulub ühele Saksa ettevõtjale, kellel on õigus müügiõigust teisele ettevõtjale anda.
Therefore, the number of suppliers in the Austrian market does not change.
Seega ei muutu pakkujate arv Austria turul.
FREQUENCY INVERTERS
SAGEDUSMUUNDURID
Both Siemens and VA Tech are suppliers of frequency inverters.
Siemens ja VA Tech on mõlemad sagedusmuundurite pakkujad.
The market investigation confirmed Siemens's view that the relevant geographic market for frequency inverters is the EEA.
Turu-uuring kinnitas Siemensi arvamust, mille kohaselt EMP on sagedusmuundurite asjaomane geograafiline turg.
In line with previous decisions the relevant product market is divided into two with the dividing line at 100 kW.
Kooskõlas eelmise otsusega tuleb eristada asjaomast tooteturgu 100 kW ribaliini korral.
Whether in the market for inverters above 100 kW a further segmentation for liquid-cooled and fourquadrant inverters is needed is left open since the competition assessment would not change.
Lahtiseks võib jääda see, kas üle 100 kW võimsusega sagedusmuundurite korral on vajalik täiendav eristamine vesijahutusega ja neljakvadrandiliste muundurite vahel, sest konkurentsihinnang sellega ei muutuks.
The combined market share of Siemens and VA Tech in the market for inverters below 100 kW is less than [15-20] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Siemensi ja VA Techi ühine turuosa on alla 100 kW sagedusmuundurite puhul alla [15–20] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
Since in 2004 VA Tech entered into a joint venture with Schneider and Toshiba (‘STI’) the market share of STI has to be added.
Et VA Tech asutas 2004. aastal koos Schneideri ja Toshibaga ühisettevõtte (STI), tuleb lisada STI turuosa.
However, even then the combined market share is below [30-40] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Kuid ka sellel juhul on ühine turuosa alla [30–40] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
Important competitors are ABB and Danfoss with 10-20 %, and Lenze, SEW Eurodrive, Vacon and Yaskawa/Omron with 5-10 % each.
Olulised konkurendid on ABB ja Danfoss 10–20 % turuosadega, Lenze, SEW Eurodrive, Vacon ja Yaskawa/Omron igaüks 5–10 % turuosaga.
There are numerous smaller companies which are strong at the local level.
Kohalikul tasandil on arvukalt väiksemaid, kuid siiski hästi esindatud ettevõtjaid.
For inverters above 100 kW the combined market share including the STI JV is less than [20-30] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Üle 100 kW muundurite osas on ühine turuosa koos STIga alla [20–30] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
For liquid-cooled and fourquadrant inverters the combined market share is below [20-30] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Vesijahutusega ja neljakvadrandiliste muundurite korral on ühine turuosa alla [20–30] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
Therefore, the Commission came to the conclusion that competition concerns are unlikely to arise under any plausible product market definition.
Komisjon jõudis seetõttu järeldusele, et ühegi võimaliku tooteturu definitsiooni korral ei teki konkurentsiprobleeme.
METALLURGICAL AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL PLANT BUILDING
METALLURGIASÜSTEEMIDE JA MUUDE TÖÖSTUSSÜSTEEMIDE EHITUS
RELEVANT PRODUCT MARKETS
ASJAOMASED TOOTETURUD
Fundamental distinctions
Põhierinevus
In the area of industrial plant building a distinction can be drawn firstly according to sectors (such as metallurgy, chemicals, paper, cement, etc.).
Tööstussüsteemide ehitust saab eristada alavaldkondade (nt metallurgia, keemia, paber, tsement jne) alusel.
This case relates primarily to metallurgical plant building.
See juhtum hõlmab peamiselt metallurgiasüsteemide ehitust.
In this respect, a distinction can be drawn between mechanical plant building, electrical plant building and plant maintenance and services.
Sealjuures saab eristada mehaaniliste ja elektriliste tööstussüsteemide ehitust ning tehaste remonti ja teenuseid.
Mechanical industrial plant building involves planning the use of machines in the industrial production process in question, procuring those machines and installing them in the production plant.
Mehaaniliste tööstussüsteemide ehituse käigus projekteeritakse masinad vastava tootmisprotsessi jaoks, hangitakse masinapark ja paigaldatakse see tootmissüsteemi.
VA Tech is a supplier in this area via its subsidiary VAI.
VA Tech tegutseb selles valdkonnas oma tütarettevõtjast pakkuja VAI kaudu.
Siemens is not itself active in this area as a supplier but, in the metallurgical sector, has a […] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Siemens ei esine siin pakkujana, kuid omab metallurgiasektoris siiski […] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.