natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
printing services;
trükiteenused;
data management services;
andmehaldusteenused;
e-transaction services;
e-tehingute teenused;
philatelic services.
filateeliateenused.
The request is accompanied by the conclusions of the independent national authority, Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (the Finnish Competition Authority), which, on the one hand, does not see ‘any particular reason to oppose the granting of the exclusion referred to in Article 30 …’, while stating on the other hand that ‘it should be remembered that Finland Post Corporation still has a very strong market position in its traditional core business, i.e. the collection and distribution of letters, packages and other addressed items, even though the entire postal sector was opened up to competition in Finland as early as 1994 pursuant to the Act on Postal Operations.
Taotlusele on lisatud riigi sõltumatu ametiasutuse Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (Soome Konkurentsiamet) järeldus, mille kohaselt ühest küljest „ei ole põhjust vastu olla artiklis 30 osutatud erandi tegemisele”, teisest küljest aga „tuleb meeles pidada, et Soome Postil on endiselt oma traditsioonilisel põhitegevusalal, st kirjade, pakkide ja teiste adressaadiga saadetiste kogumisel ja kandel väga tugev turupositsioon, ehkki kogu postisektor avati Soomes konkurentsile juba 1994. aastal vastavalt postiteenuste seadusele.
Nevertheless, no competition has emerged in Finland Post Corporation’s traditional core business.’
Soome Posti traditsioonilisel põhitegevusalal ei ole aga konkurentsi tekkinud. …”
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
ÕIGUSLIK RAAMISTIK
Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which Directive 2004/17/EC applies shall not be subject to that Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artiklis 30 sätestatakse, et direktiivis käsitletava tegevuse võimaldamiseks sõlmitud lepingute suhtes ei kohaldata kõnealust direktiivi, kui liikmesriigis, kus neid täidetakse, on see tegevus otseselt avatud konkurentsile turgudel, millele juurdepääs ei ole piiratud.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant Community legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Juurdepääsu ei peeta piiratuks, kui liikmesriik on rakendanud asjakohased ühenduse õigusaktid, mis avavad konkurentsile asjaomase sektori või osa sellest, ning kohaldab neid.
Since Finland has implemented and applied Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service [2], access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 30(3) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Kuna Soome on rakendanud ja kohaldanud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 15. detsembri 1997. aasta direktiivi 97/67/EÜ ühenduse postiteenuste siseturu arengut ja teenuse kvaliteedi parandamist käsitlevate ühiseeskirjade kohta, [2] ei peaks juurdepääsu turule pidama piiratuks direktiivi 2004/27/EÜ artikli 30 lõike 3 esimese lõigu tähenduses.
Direct exposure to competition in a particular market should be evaluated on the basis of various criteria, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Konkreetse turu otsest avatust konkurentsile tuleks hinnata mitmete kriteeriumide põhjal, millest ükski ei ole iseenesest otsustav.
In respect of the markets concerned by this decision, the market share of the main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account.
Käesolevas otsuses käsitletavate turgude puhul tuleb ühe kriteeriumina eriti arvesse võtta peamiste turuosaliste turuosa.
Another criterion is the degree of concentration on those markets.
Teine kriteerium on kõnealuste turgude kontsentratsioon.
As the conditions vary for the different activities that are concerned by this Decision, the examination of the competitive situation should take into account the different situations on different markets.
Kuna käesolevas otsuses käsitletavate tegevuste suhtes kehtivad mitmed tingimused, tuleks konkurentsiolukorra käsitlemisel arvesse võtta turgude erinevaid olukordi.
Although narrower market definitions might be envisaged in certain cases, the precise definition of the relevant market can be left open for the purposes of this Decision as far as a number of the services listed in the request submitted by Finland are concerned to the extent that the result of the analysis remains the same whether it is based on a narrow or a broader definition.
Ehkki teatavatel juhtudel võidakse ette näha turu kitsamaid määratlusi, võib asjaomase turu täpse määratluse jätta käesolevas otsuses lahtiseks, sest Soome taotluses loetletud mitmeid teenuseid käsitletakse sellises ulatuses, et analüüsi tulemus jääb samaks olenemata sellest, kas lähtutakse kitsast või laiemast määratlusest.
This Decision is without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition.
Käesolev otsus ei piira konkurentsieeskirjade kohaldamist.
Services not covered by Directive 2004/17/EC
Direktiiviga 2004/17/EÜ hõlmamata teenused
In accordance with Article 6(2)(c) of Directive 2004/17/EC, logistics services, such as warehousing services and contract logistics, and added-value services, such as printing services, data management services and e-transaction services, are covered by that Directive on condition that such services are provided by entities which also provide postal services within the meaning of Article 6(2)(b) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Vastavalt direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 6 lõike 2 punktile c hõlmab nimetatud direktiiv logistikateenuseid, nagu näiteks ladustamisteenused ja lepingulised logistikateenused, ning lisandväärtusega teenuseid, nagu näiteks trükiteenused, andmehaldusteenused ja e-tehingute teenused, tingimusel, et selliseid teenuseid pakuvad ettevõtjad, kes pakuvad ka postiteenuseid direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 6 lõike 2 punkti b tähenduses.
According to the information available to the Commission, that condition is not met in Finland in respect of warehousing, printing, data management and e-transactions services.
Komisjoni andmetel ei ole see tingimus Soomes ladustamis-, trüki-, andmehaldus- ja e-tehingute teenuste suhtes täidetud. Seega ei kohaldata nende teenuste osutamise suhtes Soomes direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ.
Addressed letter services
Adressaadiga kirjateenused
In respect of consumer letters (CtC and CtB addressed letter services, domestic and international), Finland Post has a market share of 100 %.
Tarbijakirjade (riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised tarbijatevahelised ning tarbija ja ettevõtte vahelised adressaadiga kirjateenused) puhul on Soome Posti turuosa 100 %.
For business letters, its estimated market share varies between 85 % (for BtB addressed letter services, domestic and international) and 95 % (for BtC addressed letter services, domestic and international), with none of its competitors having obtained an estimated market share exceeding 10 %.
Ärikirjade puhul on tema turuosa hinnanguliselt 85 % (riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised ettevõtetevahelised adressaadiga kirjateenused) kuni 95 % (riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised ettevõtte ja tarbija vahelised adressaadiga kirjateenused), kusjuures mitte ükski konkurent ei ole saavutanud suuremat hinnangulist turuosa kui 10 %.
According to the available information, Finland Post's market shares for international addressed letter services (inbound and outbound letters) are the same as for purely domestic services.
Olemasolevatel andmetel on Soome Posti rahvusvaheliste adresseeritud kirjateenuste (sissetulevad ja väljaminevad kirjad) turuosa sama suur kui riigisiseste teenuste puhul.
According to the Finnish authorities, those services are directly exposed to competition, first because of competitive pressure from the possibility to substitute ‘traditional’ paper-based letter services with electronic means of communication (such as e-mail or SMS) and, second, because the existing unrestricted access to the market exposes it to potential competition from possible newcomers.
Soome ametiasutuste andmetel on need teenused otseselt avatud konkurentsile esiteks konkurentsisurve tõttu, mida avaldab võimalus asendada „tavalised” paberkirjade teenused elektrooniliste sidevahenditega (nagu näiteks e-post või SMS), ja teiseks seepärast, et olemasolev piiramatu juurdepääs turule avab turu võimalike uustulnukate konkurentsile.
In respect of substitution, it should be noted that according to EC competition rules, substitutability should be analysed, inter alia, on the basis of product characteristics, price of the products and barriers associated with the switching of demand to potential substitutes.
Asendamise kohta tuleb märkida, et EÜ konkurentsieeskirjade kohaselt tuleb asendatavust analüüsida, lähtudes muu hulgas toote omadustest, toodete hindadest ning nõudluse muutumisest võimalike asendajate kasuks.
It appears that the characteristics of paper-based mail and of electronic communications differ significantly and that there is a significant barrier to switching between paper-based mail and electronic mail [3].
Paberposti ja elektronside omadused näivad oluliselt erinevat ning paberposti ja elektronposti omavaheline asendatavus on oluliselt tõkestatud.
This indicates that electronic communications belong to a different product market and therefore they cannot exercise a direct competitive restraint on Finland Post ' s addressed letter services.
See näitab, et elektronside kuulub teistsugusele tooteturule ning seetõttu ei saa Soome Posti adressaadiga kirjateenuste suhtes otsest konkurentsipiirangut kehtestada.
Furthermore, it would seem that the main effect of the increased use of electronic mail would substantially reduce the overall size of the paper-based mail market, rather than introduce competition within it.
Lisaks sellele näib, et elektronposti suurenenud kasutamine vähendab oluliselt paberposti kogumahtu, mitte ei tekita selle piires konkurentsi.
For example, according to the information supplied, the response by Finland Post to an increased marketing of e-invoicing by Finland ' s banks was to offer its own electronic services and not take any initiative concerning ‘traditional’, paper-based communications.
Esitatud teabe kohaselt reageeris Soome Post näiteks e-arvete suurenenud turustamisele Soome pankade poolt sellega, et pakkus omapoolseid elektroonilisi teenuseid ega teinud mitte mingeid algatusi seoses „tavalise” paberil sidega.
Second, as to the potential competition, it is significant that the entire postal sector has been opened to competition since 1994 and that this has until now only resulted in competitors gaining an aggregate estimated market share of just 15 % even in the most readily competitive segment (BtB addressed letter services, domestic and international).
Teiseks, võimaliku konkurentsi suhtes on oluline, et kogu postisektor on olnud konkurentsile avatud alates 1994. aastast ning siiani on konkurendid selle tulemusel saanud hinnanguliselt kokku vaid 15 % turuosa isegi kõige konkurentsialtimas segmendis (riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised ettevõtetevahelised adressaadiga kirjateenused).
As a result, there is no indication that the potential competition will play any significant role in the foreseeable future.
Seetõttu ei ole mingit märki sellest, et potentsiaalsel konkurentsil oleks lähitulevikus oluline roll.
Consistent with conclusions of the independent national authority, Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (the Finnish Competition Authority), it should be concluded that the services examined in this recital are not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Sarnaselt riigi sõltumatu ametiasutuse Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (Soome Konkurentsiamet) järeldusele tuleks järeldada, et käesolevas põhjenduses käsitletavad teenused ei ole Soomes otseselt konkurentsile avatud.
Therefore Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of those activities in Finland.
Seega ei kohaldata direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 30 lõiget 1 lepingute suhtes, mille eesmärk on Soomes nimetatud tegevusi võimaldada.
Addressed direct mail services
Adressaadiga otsepostitusteenused
In respect of addressed direct mail which for the purposes of this Decision means addressed deliveries intended as marketing communications, Finland Post has an estimated market share of 90 % with none of its competitors having obtained a market share estimated to exceed 10 %.
Adressaadiga otsepostituse valdkonnas, mis käesoleva otsuse tähenduses on adressaadiga reklaamteadete kanne, on Soome Posti hinnanguline turuosa 90 %, kusjuures mitte ükski konkurent ei ole saavutanud suuremat hinnangulist turuosa kui 10 %.
In view of this high level of concentration on this market and in the absence of any other indicators to the contrary, it should be concluded that addressed direct mail services are not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Arvestades kõnealuse turu suurt kontsentratsiooni ning vastupidisele viitavate märkide puudumist, tuleks järeldada, et adressaadiga otsepostitusteenused ei ole Soomes otseselt konkurentsile avatud.
Therefore Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of that activity in Finland.
Seega ei kohaldata direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 30 lõiget 1 lepingute suhtes, mille eesmärk on Soomes nimetatud tegevust võimaldada.
Consumer standard parcel services (CtC and CtB), domestic and international
Riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised tarbija (tarbijatevahelised ning tarbija ja ettevõtte vahelised) tavapakiteenused
In respect of these services, Finland Post's position is quite strong with an estimated market share of 80 % [4].
Soome Posti positsioon on kõnealuste teenuste puhul üsna tugev – tema hinnanguline turuosa on 80 %.
The market share of the biggest (and only significant) competitor of Finland Post covers virtually the remaining 20 % [5].
Soome Posti suurima (ja ainsa olulise) konkurendi turuosa katab peaaegu ülejäänud 20 %.
Consistent with the conclusions of the Finnish competition authority, it should be concluded that the category of services examined is not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Sarnaselt Soome konkurentsiameti järeldusele tuleks järeldada, et käsitletav teenuste liik ei ole Soomes otseselt konkurentsile avatud.
Early delivery of newspapers
Ajalehtede varajane kanne
This service is defined as morning delivery, seven days a week, of newspapers published at least three times per week.
Kõnealune teenus tähendab vähemalt kolm korda nädalas ilmuvate ajalehtede hommikust kannet kõikidel nädalapäevadel.
In respect of this service, Finland Post has a market share estimated at almost three quarters (74 %) and that of its biggest competitor amounts to approximately 10 %.
Selle teenuse puhul on Soome Posti hinnanguline turuosa peaaegu kolmveerand (74 %) ning tema suurima konkurendi turuosa umbes 10 %.
In view of the high market share of Finland Post and conversely the relatively low market share of even its biggest competitor, it should be concluded that early delivery of newspapers is not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Arvestades Soome Posti suurt turuosa ja teisalt isegi tema suurima konkurendi suhteliselt väikest turuosa, tuleks järeldada, et ajalehtede varajane kanne ei ole Soomes otseselt konkurentsile avatud.
Therefore Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of this activity in Finland.
Seega ei kohaldata direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 30 lõiget 1 lepingute suhtes, mille eesmärk on Soomes nimetatud tegevust võimaldada.
Standard delivery of newspapers
Ajalehtede tavakanne
With a market share of 100 % Finland Post is the only supplier of these services.
100 % turuosaga Soome Post on kõnealuste teenuste ainus osutaja.
As the delivery of these newspapers takes place at the same time as the delivery of letters and using the same circuits as those used for the delivery of addressed letter services examined under recital 10, the same conclusion as to the competitive situation applies, particularly since the different characteristics of printed newspaper and electronic communication are even more obvious here.
Kuna neid ajalehti toimetatakse kätte koos kirjadega, kasutades samu kanderinge, mida kasutatakse põhjenduses 10 käsitletud adressaadiga kirjateenuste puhul, kehtib konkurentsiolukorra suhtes sama järeldus, eriti kuna trükitud ajalehe ja elektronside erinevad omadused on siin veelgi ilmsemad.
For these reasons it should be concluded that standard delivery of newspapers is not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Seetõttu tuleks järeldada, et ajalehtede tavakanne ei ole Soomes otseselt konkurentsile avatud.
Overall solutions in respect of direct mail
Otsepostituse terviklahendused
According to the notification and the supplementary information submitted by the Finnish authorities, overall solutions in respect of direct mail are seen as different combinations of various services such as printing services, addressing and focusing services, copy services and (electronic) feedback services in combination with addressed and/or unaddressed direct mail services [6].
Soome ametiasutuste esitatud teate ja lisateabe kohaselt käsitletakse otsepostituse terviklahendustena mitmesuguste teenuste, nagu näiteks trükiteenuste, adresseerimis- ja koondamisteenuste, kopeerimis- ja (elektroonilise) tagasiside eri kombinatsioone adressaadiga ja/või adressaadita otsepostitusteenustega.
The precise combination of services depends on the demands of the individual customers.
Teenuste täpne kombinatsioon oleneb konkreetse kliendi nõudmistest.
Taken individually, Finland Post ' s estimated market shares for some of the services that could be combined within an ‘overall solution’, vary quite widely: for addressed direct mail: 90 %, unaddressed direct mail: 41 %, printing services: 36 %, data management services (which include feed-back services): 4 %.
Soome Posti hinnanguline turuosa terviklahenduse hulka kuuluvate üksikteenuste puhul on üsna erinev: adressaadiga otsepostituse puhul 90 %, adressaadita otsepostituse puhul 41 %, trükiteenuste puhul 36 %, (tagasisideteenuseid sisaldavate) andmehaldusteenuste puhul 4 %.
This would seem to indicate that the competitive situation cannot be the same irrespective of the chosen combination of services.
See näitab, et konkurentsiolukorda ei saa pidada ühesuguseks olenemata valitud teenuste kombinatsioonist.
Also, unaddressed direct mail can be considered as being directly exposed to competition, whereas that is not the case for addressed direct mail.
Lisaks sellele võib adressaadita otsepostitust pidada otseselt konkurentsile avatuks, kuid adressaadiga otsepostitust mitte.
Since it cannot be ascertained which services may be grouped together if one or more customers decide to request them, a decision as to the legal regime applicable to overall solutions would entail substantial legal uncertainty.
Kuna ei ole võimalik kindlaks teha, milliseid teenuseid võidakse rühmitada, kui üks või mitu klienti neid kasutada soovib, kätkeks terviklahenduste suhtes kohaldatavat õiguslikku režiimi käsitlev otsus märkimisväärset õiguskindlusetust.
Under these circumstances, overall solutions in respect of direct mail as defined in the Finnish notification cannot be the subject of a decision pursuant to Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC as a single category of services.
Neil asjaoludel ei saa Soome teates määratletud otsepostituse terviklahenduste kohta teha direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 30 alusel ühte teenuste liiki käsitlevat otsust.
Services to which Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC is applicable
Teenused, mille suhtes direktiivi 2004/17/EÜ artikli 30 lõiget 1 kohaldatakse
Unaddressed direct mail services
Adressaadita otsepostitusteenused
On this market, Finland Post's market share amounts to an estimated 41 %.
Kõnealusel turul ulatub Soome Posti hinnanguline turuosa 41 %ni.
Considering the degree of concentration on this market, where the biggest competitor has obtained a share estimated at approximately 30 %, these factors should be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.
Selle turu kontsentratsiooni arvestades – suurim konkurent on saavutanud umbes 30 % turuosa – tuleks neid tegureid pidada konkurentsile otsese avatuse märgiks.
BtB standard parcel services, domestic and international
Riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised ettevõtetevahelised tavapakiteenused
In respect of domestic BtB standard parcel services, Finland Post's market share amounts to an estimated 35 %.
Soome Posti hinnanguline turuosa ettevõtetevaheliste riigisiseste tavapakiteenuste puhul on 35 %.
For international services, Finland Post's market share, according to the available information, is lower than for domestic services, between the order of 13 and 15 %.
Rahvusvaheliste teenuste puhul on Soome Posti turuosa olemasolevatel andmetel väiksem kui riigisiseste teenuste puhul, jäädes suurusjärku 13–15 %.
Considering that the estimated aggregate market shares of the two biggest competitors with regard to domestic services amount to 28 %, which is not substantially different from the market share of Finland Post, it is concluded that the activity is directly exposed to competition.
Arvestades, et kahe suurima konkurendi hinnanguline turuosa riigisiseste teenuste puhul on kokku 28 % ega erine oluliselt Soome Posti turuosast, järeldatakse, et kõnealune tegevus on konkurentsile otseselt avatud.
BtC standard parcel services, domestic and international
Riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised ettevõtte ja tarbija vahelised tavapakiteenused
Finland Post's market share for domestic services amounts to an estimated 63 %, which is a relatively high level per se.
Riigisiseste teenuste puhul ulatub Soome Posti hinnanguline turuosa 63 %ni, mis on iseenesest suhteliselt kõrge tase.
For international services, Finland Post's market share, according to the available information, is lower than for domestic services, between 13 and 15 %.
Rahvusvaheliste teenuste puhul on Soome Posti turuosa olemasolevatel andmetel väiksem kui riigisiseste teenuste puhul, ulatudes 13–15 %ni.
However, at 37 % for domestic services, the estimated market share of the biggest competitor amounts to more than half of that of Finland Post and at that level it can be considered that that competitor would be able to exert a significant competitive pressure on Finland Post.
Suurima konkurendi hinnanguline turuosa, mis on riigisiseste teenuste puhul 37 %, on aga suurem kui pool Soome Posti turuosast ning võib arvestada, et kõnealune konkurent suudab avaldada Soome Postile olulist konkurentsisurvet.
These factors should therefore be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.
Seetõttu tuleb neid tegureid pidada konkurentsile otsese avatuse märgiks.
Express and courier parcel services, domestic and international
Riigisisesed ja rahvusvahelised kiir- ja kullerpakiteenused
On this market, Finland Post does not have the biggest market share and its estimated share of 10 % is several times smaller than that of its biggest competitor, whose market share lies in a range between a third and up to a half of the market.
Sel turul ei ole Soome Postil suurimat turuosa – tema hinnanguline 10 % turuosa on kordades väiksem tema suurima konkurendi omast, kelle turuosa ulatub kolmandiku kuni pooleni turust.
These factors should therefore be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition of express and courier parcel services, domestic and international.
Seetõttu tuleb neid tegureid pidada riigisiseste ja rahvusvaheliste kiir- ja kullerpakiteenuste konkurentsile otsese avatuse märgiks.
Light goods services and freight services
Konteineris saadetiste ja kaubaveoteenused