natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission's market investigation shows that the merger will lead to a substantial weakening of the current competition between VAI and SMS owing to Siemens's minority stake in SMS.
Turu-uuring näitas, et Siemensi vähemusosalust SMSis arvestades kaasneks koondumisega VAI ja SMSi vahelise olemasoleva konkurentsi tuntav nõrgenemine.
Because of VAI’s market strength in this highly concentrated market and the very close competition between VAI and SMS, and in particular because other competitors are not able to restrict Siemens/VAI’s competitive room for manoeuvre sufficiently if the competitive pressure exerted on Siemens/VAI by SMS is weakened, the merger will in any event pose a significant impediment to effective competition through uncoordinated behaviour and possibly also by creating a dominant position for Siemens/VAI.
Arvestades VAI erilist tugevust sellel ülikontsentreeritud turul, VAI ja Siemensi vahelisi lähedasi konkurentsisuhteid ning asjaolu, et teised konkurendid ei ole võimelised Siemensi/VAI konkurentsi mänguruumi piisavalt piirama, kui SMSi konkurentsisurve tagasi Siemensile/VAI-le läheb, toob koondumine igal juhul mittekoordineeritud käitumise tõttu kaasa olemasoleva konkurentsi tuntava takistamise ja võimalik, et seetõttu ka Siemensi/VAI turgu valitseva seisundi tekkimise.
VAI and SMS are the closest competitors in the relevant market.
VAI ja SMS on asjaomasel turul lähimad konkurendid.
Because of this close competition between VAI and SMS, a customer who decides against VA Tech in a particular metallurgical project would very probably regard SMS as the next best alternative.
Selle lähedase konkurentsisuhte tõttu vaatleks klient, kes ei otsusta teatud metallurgiaprojektis VA Techi kasuks, suurima tõenäosusega esimese alternatiivina SMSi.
This is shown by the ratings given by the competitors and customers questioned during the Commission's market investigation.
See tuleb välja ka turu-uuringu käigus küsitletud konkurentide ja klientide koostatud pingeridadest.
Danieli is usually regarded as the third strongest competitor, but on average well behind SMS and VAI.
Danielit vaadeldakse üldiselt tugevuselt kolmanda konkurendina, kuid enamasti SMSist ja VAIst tagapool.
Its strength lies mainly in long product rolling, where it is the market leader.
Tema tugevus seisneb eelkõige pikkade toodete valtsimises, kus ta on turuliider.
Because of its market position and customer rating, Danieli is unlikely to be able either to prevent a decline of competition in the market for mechanical metallurgical plant building as a whole or to threaten the dominant position that VAI might gain as a result of Siemens/VAI's information advantage.
Arvestades tema turuseisundit ja klientide pingeridu, ei oleks Danieli tõenäoliselt võimeline takistama konkurentsi üldist vähenemist mehaaniliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse valdkonnas või valitsevat seisundit saavutama, mille VAI võiks saada Siemensi/VAI infoeelise tõttu.
Moreover, customers need at least three competitive bids in order to negotiate successfully in the field of metallurgical plant building.
Lisaks on klientidel eduka kauplemise jaoks metallurgiasüsteemide ehituses vaja vähemalt kolme pakkumist.
There is no significant competitive pressure from other competitors.
Teised konkurendid ei avalda tuntavat survet.
The major suppliers mentioned by Siemens besides the three market leaders are rarely or never active in Europe and so do not represent a proper alternative for European customers.
Siemensi poolt lisaks kolmele turuliidrile nimetatud suuremad pakkujad tegutsevad Euroopas harva või ei tegutse üldse ning ei ole seega Euroopa klientide jaoks asjakohased alternatiivid.
Smaller suppliers are very unlikely to be able to bid successfully for major contracts.
Väiksemate pakkujate puhul on ebatõenäoline, et nad suudaksid suurtellimuste korral edukaid pakkumisi teha.
Apart from the three market leaders, competition is very fragmented and is not sufficiently capable of curbing the market power of the three leading suppliers.
Kui kolm turuliidrit kõrvale jätta, on konkurents killustunud ning ei suudaks seetõttu kolme juhtiva pakkuja turuvõimule vastu seista.
A large supplier of mechanical metallurgical plant building has a large number of customers accounting for the bulk of the firm's orders and is not therefore highly dependent on individual customers.
Ühel mehaaniliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse suurpakkujal on arvukalt kliente, kellele läheb suurem osa tema tellimustest, mistõttu ta ei sõltu eriti üksikutest klientidest.
The merger would substantially weaken the competitive pressure exerted by SMS on Siemens/VAI.
Koondumine nõrgendaks oluliselt konkurentsisurvet, mida SMS avaldab Siemensile/VAI-le.
Siemens has exercised a put option to sell its share in SMS to the majority shareholder.
Siemens kasutas müügioptsiooni, et oma osa SMSis enamusaktsiate omanikule müüa.
However, the matter is contentious as regards the value of Siemens's share and potentially lengthy litigation is pending before the German courts.
Siemensi osa väärtus on siiski vaieldav ning Saksa kohtus on pooleli võimalik pikk kohtuasi.
Until this litigation has been settled and the sale of Siemens's 28 % share is therefore completed […] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Niikaua kuni see ei ole otsustatud ja Siemensi 28 % osaluse müük lõpule viidud[…] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
Given Siemens's continuing 28 % share in SMS, the merger would thus substantially weaken competition between Siemens/VAI and SMS.
SMSil säilib 28 % aktsiaosalus ja seega nõrgendaks koondumine oluliselt Siemensi/VAI ja SMSi vahelist konkurentsi.
Whether the information advantage over its strongest competitor SMS and its lead over Danieli in terms of market power would give Siemens/VAI a dominant position can be left open.
Küsimus, kas infoeelis oma tugevaima konkurendi SMSi suhtes ja turuvõimu edumaa Danieli suhtes asetab Siemensi/VAI valitsevasse turuseisundisse, võib lahtiseks jääda.
In any event the merger would have a serious harmful impact on competition as a result of uncoordinated behaviour by firms.
Igal juhul oleks koondumisel ettevõtjate koordineerimata käitumise tagajärjena konkurentsile eriti kahjulik mõju.
For these reasons there would be a significant impediment to effective competition in the overall market for mechanical metallurgical plant building.
Sellest tuleneb olemasoleva konkurentsi oluline takistamine mehaaniliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse koguturul.
Submarkets of mechanical metallurgical plant building: Creation of a dominant position
Mehaaniliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse osaturud: Valitseva turuseisundi teke
The above conclusions apply even more forcefully to the possible process step submarkets in mechanical plant building for steelmaking and for continuous casting.
Need järeldused kehtivad veelgi suuremal määral terasetootmise ja pidevvalu mehaaniliste süsteemide ehituse võimalike etapiturgude puhul.
In the other possible submarkets in mechanical metallurgical plant building, however, it is impossible to state with sufficient certainty that the merger would constitute a significant impediment to effective competition.
Mehaaniliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse ülejäänud võimalike osaturgude puhul ei saa aga täie kindlusega välja selgitada, kas koondumine tooks kaasa olemasoleva konkurentsi tuntava takistamise.
In the possible market in mechanical plant building for steelmaking, VAI is the firm rated highest overall by competitors and customers in the Commission's market investigation.
Terasetootmise mehaaniliste süsteemide ehituse võimalikul turul hindasid konkurendid ja kliendid VAId komisjoni turu-uuringus kokkuvõttes kõige kõrgemalt.
In second place, just behind, is SMS.
Vahetult tema järel teisel kohal on SMS.
VAI and SMS have high EEA and world market shares in a concentrated market.
VAI-l ja SMSil on sellel kontsentreeritud turul suured turuosad EMP turul ja maailmaturul.
VAI and SMS each have estimated world market shares of around 30–40 %; their EEA market shares are, with a high likelihood, even higher.
Nende vastav osa maailmaturul on 30 ja 40 % vahel; nende osa EMP turul on suure tõenäosusega veel suurem.
These high market shares suggest that the market is already highly concentrated, which makes a significant negative impact on customers more likely.
Need suured turuosad lubavad järeldada kõrge kontsentratsiooniga turgude olemasolu, mis muudab tunduvalt ebasoodsamad mõjud klientidele tõenäolisemaks.
This is especially true given the close competition between the two strongest players, which would diminish as a result of the merger in favour of the leading firm.
See kehtib eelkõige lähedase konkurentsi tõttu kahe suurima pakkuja vahel, mis pärast koondumist väheneks juhtiva ettevõtja kasuks.
VAI and SMS are the closest competitors.
VAI ja SMS on lähimad konkurendid.
Danieli lies well behind in third place and is not in such close competition.
Danieli on suure vahemaa järel kolmandal kohal ning ei ole nii lähedases konkurentsisuhtes.
The remaining competition is fragmented.
Ülejäänud konkurents on killustunud.
Smaller suppliers cannot compete with the big players in major projects or rely on cooperation with the big suppliers or specialise in specific market niches.
Väiksemad pakkujad ei saa suurprojektide korral suuremate pakkujatega konkureerida või sõltuvad nendega koostööst või spetsialiseeruvad üksikutele turuniššidele.
In the possible market for mechanical plant building for continuous casting, VAI is clearly rated by customers and competitors alike as the market leader both in the EEA and worldwide.
Pidevvalu mehaaniliste süsteemide ehituse võimalikul turul vaatlevad kliendid ja konkurendid nii EMPs kui kogu maailmas VAId üheselt turuliidrina.
VAI very probably has market shares of over 50 % in the EEA and worldwide.
VAI-l on EMPs ja kogu maailmas suurima tõenäosusega üle 50 % turuosa.
SMS ranks second and is VAI's closest competitor.
SMS järgneb teisel kohal ning on VAI lähim konkurent.
Danieli is well behind in third place.
Danieli on selge vahemaaga kolmandal kohal.
Competition is fragmented and is not sufficiently capable of curbing VAI's market power.
Konkurents on killustunud ning ei ole valmis VAI turuvõimu piirama.
Under these circumstances […] [1] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Nendes tingimustes tooksid […] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
would result in a dominant position of Siemens in the possible markets for mechanical plant building for steelmaking and mechanical plant building for continuous casting, constituting a significant impediment to effective competition.
kaasa Siemensi valitseva turuseisundi terasetootmise ja pidevvalu mehaaniliste süsteemide ehituse võimalikel turgudel, ning takistaksid seega tuntavalt olemasolevat konkurentsi.
Market for electrical metallurgical plant building (level 0-2, iron/steel), possible process area and process step markets
Elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse (0.–2. aste, raud/teras) turg, võimalikud protsessivaldkonna- ja etapiturud
Market structure and market shares
Turustruktuur ja turuosad
The Commission's market investigation has shown that Siemens is seen by many market participants as the most important supplier of electrical metallurgical plant building in the iron/steel sector in the EEA and worldwide.
Turu-uuring näitas, et paljud turul osalejad vaatlevad Siemensit EMP ja ülemaailmse raua-/terasesektori elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituses olulisima pakkujana.
This is true for the possible overall market and in most of the submarkets, except in the possible long rolling submarket, where Danieli is seen as the leader.
See kehtib võimaliku koguturu ja enamiku osaturgude suhtes, välja arvatud pikkade toodete valtsimise osaturg, kus turuliidrina nähakse Danielit.
In all these areas VAI is regarded as a strong competitor, usually in second place in the market; and in the field of continuous casting it is even regarded as roughly on a par with Siemens.
Nendes valdkondades nähakse VAId tugeva konkurendina ülekaalukalt teisel kohal, pidevvalu valdkonnas isegi pea sama tugevana kui Siemensit.
It is, however, significant that besides them, around four other competitors are held to be strong and credible suppliers.
Siiski tuleb esile tõsta, et ka nelja muud konkurenti vaadeldakse tugevate ja usaldusväärsete pakkujatena.
The main firms in question are ABB, Alstom, SMS and Danieli, in some areas, especially worldwide, Toshiba (or TMEIC-GE) as well, and in some areas also Sundwig-Andritz, Ingelectric or ASI Robicon.
Siinjuures on peamiselt tegemist ABB, Alstomi, SMSi ja Danieliga, mõnes valdkonnas, eriti maailmatasandil, Toshiba (või TMEIC-GEga) ning Sundwig-Andritzi, Ingelectriic ja ASI Robiconiga.
Market shares are rather difficult to quantify objectively in this very varied and differentiated product or service area.
Selles homogeenses ja diferentseeritud toote- ja teenusevaldkonnas on turuosi raske kindlaks teha.
The Commission has several estimates from Siemens, some produced for the purpose of the proceedings and others produced well before they started.
Komisjonil on olemas mõned Siemensi hinnangud, mis koostati osaliselt menetluse jaoks ja osaliselt selgelt enne menetluse algust.
The Commission also has estimates drawn up by VA Tech before the proceedings began as well as estimates drawn up during the proceedings at the Commission's request.
Samuti on olemas VA Techi enne menetluse algust koostatud hinnangud ning hinnangud, mis koostati komisjoni palvel menetluse ajal.
Finally, estimates drawn up by SMS for the purposes of the proceedings were also submitted to the Commission.
Lisaks esitas SMS komisjonile menetluse tarbeks hinnanguid.
The estimates give quite a wide range of figures for market shares.
Nendest hinnangutest ilmneb turuosade suur kõikumine.
Siemens's estimates generally assume combined market shares of less than 20 %, whereas VAI's estimates are considerably higher, somewhere in the region of 40–50 %.
Siemens lähtub oma hinnangutes alla 20 % ühistest turuosadest, samas kui VAI väitel on turuosa tunduvalt suurem, asetsedes 40–50 % vahel.
The highest figures, for some process step markets, appear in SMS's estimates.
Mõne etapituru suurimad arvud on toodud SMSi hinnangutes.
In the view of the Commission (and of some of the competitors mentioned) none of these estimates can be regarded as very reliable.
Komisjoni (ja mõne nimetatud konkurendi) arvates ei saa ükski neist hinnangutest olla eriti usaldusväärne.
The Commission carried out an analysis of the strength of the major competitors in the main part of the markets referred to above, i.e. for orders of more than EUR1 million, for the years 2002-04.
Komisjon analüüsis olulisemate konkurentide tugevust nimetatud turu peaosas, st üle 1 miljoni euroste tellimuste puhul aastatel 2002–2004.
It asked competitors about all the orders they had won during the relevant period and aggregated the figures.
Komisjon küsis konkurentidelt andmeid kõigi tellimuste kohta, mida nad nimetatud ajavahemikus said, ning liitis vastavad arvud.
The results of the inquiry reflect the relative size of the firms questioned.
Küsitluse tulemustes peegeldub küsitletud ettevõtjate suhteline suurus.
At a late stage in the proceedings, Siemens provided further details about other competitors (in the liquid phase).
Menetluse hilises faasis esitas Siemens täiendavaid andmeid vedela faasi teiste konkurentide kohta.
The Commission checked the information and took it into account where it was confirmed in time by the customers and/or competitors in question.
Komisjon kontrollis neid andmeid ja võttis need arvesse pärast nende kinnitamist klientide ja/või konkurentide poolt.
In the Commission's view this calculation represents a reasonable approximation of the actual market shares.
Komisjoni arvates on see arvestus kasutuskõlblik ning lähedane tegelikele turuosadele.
However, the percentages indicated must be regarded as the upper limit and the actual market shares are very probably somewhat lower.
Esitatud turuosi tuleb siiski vaadelda ülemise piirina, samas kui tegelikud turuosad on suurima tõenäosusega väiksemad.
The figures show that the merger will probably not lead to market shares of more than 35–40 %.
Need arvud näitavad, et koondumine ei too suure tõenäosusega kaasa üle 35–40 % turuosi.
At least four strong suppliers will remain in the market in each process area and process step, and they can be expected to exert sufficient competitive pressure on the merged firms.
Igas protsessivaldkonnas ja igas etapis jääb turule vähemalt neli tugevat pakkujat, kellest võib eeldada, et nad avaldavad piisavat konkurentsisurvet ühinenud ettevõtjatele.
Tender analysis
Hankekonkursside analüüs
The relevant market/markets are bidding markets, where market shares are only indicative.
Asjaomase turu/asjaomaste turgude puhul on tegemist pakkujaturgudega, kus turuosa on vaid orienteeruv suurus.
The decisive factor is the strength of the competitive pressure exerted by firms on one another in the bidding process, although long-term market shares are an important indicator of such strength.
Otsustavaks on konkurentsisurve tugevus, mida ettevõtjad pakkumismenetluse käigus üksteisele avaldavad, sealjuures on pikaajalised turuosad selle tugevuse oluliseks indikaatoriks.
The tender analysis of data from Siemens and VAI showed that, at the most, Siemens and VAI can be regarded as close competitors in a few possible submarkets (continuous casting, liquid phase). But even in those few submarkets they are not the closest competitors.
Siemensi ja VAI hankekonkursside andmete analüüs näitab, et mõnel võimalikul osaturul (pidevvalu, vedelfaas) saaks lähedaste konkurentidena vaadelda parimal juhul Siemensit ja VAId, kuid nad ei ole isegi nendel osaturgudel lähimad konkurendid.
Effect of Siemens's shareholding in SMS
Siemensi osaluse mõjud SMSis
, at any rate in electrical metallurgical plant building. (This also applies to all other electrical metallurgical plant building markets.)
Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga.
Possible level 1 and 2 automation markets
tema osaluse kohta SMSis, et kaotada mehaaniliste metallurgiasüsteemide valdkonnas konkurentsiprobleemid, kõrvaldavad juba ainuüksi selle osalusega olulise konkurentsitakistuse […] [1] Osa tekstist on muudetud selleks, et tagada, et konfidentsiaalset teavet ei avaldata. Kõnealused osad on nurksulgudes ja tähistatud tärniga. vähemalt elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse valdkonnas (see kehtib ka kõigi teiste elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse turgudel). 1. ja 2. taseme võimalikud automatiseerimisturud
The market investigation has confirmed that competitors’ level 1 and 2 software solutions are considered relevant indicators of market strength.
Turu-uuring kinnitas, et konkurendid vaatlevad 1. ja 2. tasandi tarkvaralahendusi turuvõimu oluliste indikaatoritena.
However, in these possible markets also, a sufficient number of strong competitors remain: SMS, Danieli, ABB, Alstom and TMEIC-GE.
Ka neile turgudele jääb siiski piisavalt tugevaid konkurente, nagu SMS, Danieli, ABB, Alstom ja TMEIC-GE.
In addition, there are a number of other competitors who are active above all in the area of level 1, where entry barriers are lower than in level 2, or in niche solutions in competition with the parties to the merger.
Lisaks on olemas terve rida teisi konkurente, kes tegutsevad eelkõige 1. tasandil, kus juurdepääsupiirangud on väiksemad kui 2. tasandil, või pakuvad Siemensi/VA Techi konkurentidena nišilahendusi.
This is confirmed by an analysis carried out by the Commission of market strengths in the case of level 1 and 2 software modules in a few process stages.
Seda kinnitab mõne etapi 1. ja 2. tasandi tarkvaramooduli turuvõimu analüüs.
Data from individual major competitors were lacking, but it was possible to carry out an analysis of a worst-case scenario which confirms the continued existence of strong competitors in the possible markets.
Üksikute peakonkurentide andmeid ei olnud veel olemas, kuid siiski oli võimalik vaadelda halvimat juhtumit, millega kinnitati tugevate konkurentide püsimist võimalikel turgudel.
Electrical metallurgical plant building for aluminium hot rolling and aluminium cold rolling
Alumiiniumi kuum- ja külmvaltsimise elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehitus
The possible markets for aluminium rolling mill building are, in comparison with steel rolling, very small.
Alumiiniumi valtspinkide ehituse võimalikud turud on terase valtspinkide turgudega võrreldes väga väikesed.
For this reason alone, in the case of joint steel and aluminium rolling markets the above analysis of steel rolling markets could not be substantially affected.
Juba ainuüksi sellel põhjusel ei muutuks terase valtsimisturu eesseisev analüüs terase ja alumiiniumi ühiste valtsimisturgude korral oluliselt.
The overwhelming majority of customers regard the impact of the merger in the area of electrical plant building for aluminium hot and cold rolling mills as unproblematic.
Enamik kliente ei pea koondumise mõju alumiiniumi külm- ja kuumvaltspinkide elektriliste süsteemide ehituses problemaatiliseks.
It is true that both parties are often named prominently as being among the leading bidders.
Paika peab see, et Siemens ja VA Tech paigutatakse sageli juhtivate pakkujate hulka.
However, a number of other companies have won tenders. Mention was made of ABB, TMEIC, Alstom, ASI Robicon and IAS.
Kuid edukate pakkujatena nimetati ka teisi ettevõtjaid, nagu ABB, TMEIC, Alstom, ASI Robicon ja IAS.
Entry barriers in the aluminium field are appreciably lower for suppliers of mechanical aluminium mills and for companies which already offer level 1 and 2 automation in the steel field.
Alumiiniumivaldkonna juurdepääsupiirangud on tunduvalt väiksemad mehaaniliste alumiiniumvaltspinkide pakkujatele ja ettevõtjatele, kes juba pakuvad 1. ja 2. taseme automatiseerimist terasevaldkonnas.
IT solutions for plant logistics/MES/level 3
Süsteemilogistika/tootmisprotsessi struktuuri/3. taseme IT-lahendused
In this relatively young and relatively strongly growing market, the transaction does not give rise to any competition concerns.
Sellel suhteliselt noorel ja juba oluliselt kasvaval turul ei tekita asjaomane tehing konkurentsiprobleeme.
The area is small and therefore does not make a substantial difference when it comes to examining a possible overall market for electrical metallurgical plant building.
Seetõttu ei ole olulist vahet, kas see väike valdkond kaasatakse elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse võimalikku koguturgu või mitte.
Conclusion on a possible overall market for electrical metallurgical plant building including all the above submarkets and on all possible submarkets
Järeldus elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse võimaliku koguturu kohta koos kõigi olemasolevate ja võimalike osaturgudega
Since no competition problems arise in any of the possible submarkets of an overall market for electrical metallurgical plant building, the same necessarily holds true for a possible overall market.
Elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse koguturu ühelgi võimalikul osaturul ei ole konkurentsiprobleeme ning seega ei ole neid ka võimalikul koguturul.
In no possible market for electrical metallurgical plant building is there any question of the creation or strengthening of a dominant position or of any other significant impediment to effective competition.
Mitte ühelgi elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse võimalikul turul ei teki küsimust valitseva seisundi tekkimise või tugevnemise või olemasoleva konkurentsi mõne muu tuntava takistuse kohta.
Nor are any anticompetitive effects for electrical metallurgical plant building apparent from the supplementary examination of possible non-horizontal effects.
Ka võimalike horisontaalsete mõjude täiendava kontrollimise käigus ei tuvastatud elektriliste metallurgiasüsteemide ehituse konkurentsi kahjustavaid mõjusid.