natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Measure 7: In April 1998 CWP obtained an operating loan of EUR 3221139 (DEM 6,3 million) from Hypovereinsbank.
Meede 7: aprillis 1998 sai CWP pangalt Hypovereinsbank 3221139 euro (6,3 mln Saksa marga) suuruse käibevahendite laenu.
This loan was covered by a 20 % guarantee from the BvS for EUR 644228 (DEM 1.26 million).
See laen oli tagatud BvSi-poolse 20 % tagatisega summas 644228 eurot (1,26 mln Saksa marka).
The remaining 80 % was covered by a guarantee from the Land of Saxony-Anhalt (see Measure 9).
Ülejäänud 80 % olid tagatud Sachsen-Anhalt’i liidumaa käendusega (meede 9).
The loan was to run until December 1998 but was subsequently prolonged several times and, according to the latest information, is still outstanding.
Laen pidi kestma detsembrini 1998. Pärast nimetatud tähtaja saabumist pikendati laenu aga mitmeid kordi ning viimaste andmete kohaselt pole seda veel tagasi makstud.
Measure 8: In April 1998 CWP also obtained an investment loan of EUR 4345981 (DEM 8,5 million) from Hypovereinsbank.
Meede 8: aprillis 1998 sai CWP ka pangalt Hypovereinsbank 4345981 euro (8,5 mln Saksa marga) suuruse investeerimislaenu.
This loan was covered by a 20 % guarantee from the BvS for EUR 869196 (DEM 1,7 million).
See laen oli tagatud BvSi-poolse 20 % tagatisega summas 869196 eurot (1,7 mln Saksa marka).
The remaining 80 % was covered by a guarantee from the Land of Saxony-Anhalt (see Measure 10).
Ülejäänud 80 % tagati Sachsen-Anhalt’i liidumaa tagatisega (vaata meede 10).
The loan was to run until May 2013.
Laen kestab maini 2013.
According to the latest information, it is still outstanding.
Vastavalt viimasele informatsioonile pole seda veel tagasi makstud.
Measures 7a/8a: Following the initiation of the formal investigation procedure, Germany stated that the 20 % guarantees from the BvS were prolonged on several occasions.
Meetmed 7a/8a: pärast formaalse kontrollmenetluse algatamist teatas Saksamaa, et BvSi 20 % tagatisi pikendati mitmeid kordi.
On 21 November 2000 the BvS finally paid direct to the banks the part of the loans covered by these guarantees, i.e. EUR 1513424 (DEM 2,96 million).
BvS maksis lõpuks nende tagatistega kindlustatud osa laenust, s.o 1513424 eurot (2,96 mln Saksa marka), 21. novembril 2000 otse pankadele.
This cash serves as security for the repayment of the credit by CWP.
Need sularahavahendid on tagatiseks laenu tagasimaksmisele CWP poolt.
Hence, for the banks it merely replaces existing securities, but for CWP it constitutes a new loan replacing 20 % of the previous ones.
Seetõttu seisneb asi pankade jaoks ainult olemasolevate garantiide asendamises, CWP jaoks on siiski aga tegemist uue laenuga, mis asendab eelmist 20 % ulatuses.
CWP is supposed to pay the amount of EUR 1513424 (DEM 2,96 million) by 31 December 2005, together with interest corresponding to the Commission’s reference rate.
CWP pidi 31. detsembrini 2005 maksma tagasi 1513424 euro (2,96 mln Saksa marga) suuruse summa ning tasuma intresse vastavalt komisjoni soovituslikule viitintressimäärale.
However, in its response to the information injunction, Germany reported that since January 2003 CWP had not paid any interest and that the payments had been deferred.
Vastuses informeerimiskorraldusele teatas Saksamaa siiski, et CWP ei maksa intresse alates jaanuarist 2003 ning et maksete tähtaegu on pikendatud.
Interest accumulated until December 2002 and amounting to EUR 301000 (DEM 588705) was paid in July 2003.
Kuni detsembrini 2002 kogunenud intressid summas 301000 eurot (588705 Saksa marka) kustutati juulis 2003.
The latest amendment to the privatisation contract, which took place in July 2003, provided for the transformation of this loan, including interest deferred since January 2003, into a grant, i.e. the waiver of the repayment of the loan, including the outstanding interest, by CWP in the event of a positive Commission decision.
Erastamislepingu viimane muudatus juulist 2003 nägi ette laenu, kaasa arvatud jaanuarist 2003 pikendatud maksetähtajaga intressid, toetuseks ümbermuutmist, s.t loobumist laenu ja tasumata intresside tagasimaksmisest CWP poolt komisjoni positiivse otsuse korral.
Since the measures in question consist simply in the prolongation or the extension of the measures covered by the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, they must be assessed by the Commission in the present decision.
Kuna küsimuse all olevad meetmed seisnevad ainult formaalse kontrollmenetluse algatamise otsusega kaetud meetmete pikendamises või täiendamises, siis tuleb neid käesolevas otsuses komisjoni poolt hinnata.
Measure 9: The remaining amount of the operating loan of EUR 3221138 (DEM 6,3 million) under Measure 7 was also covered by an 80 % guarantee from the Land of Saxony-Anhalt amounting to EUR 2576911 (DEM 5,04 million).
Meede 9: 3221138 euro (6,3 mln Saksa marga) suuruse käibevahendite laenu (meede 7) järelejäänud summa oli tagatud Sachsen-Anhalt'i liidumaa poolse 80 % tagatisega 2576911 euro (5,04 mln Saksa marga) ulatuses.
This guarantee was initially granted until 30 April 1998 but was prolonged for one year on several occasions.
Käendust võimaldati esialgu kuni 30. aprillini 1998, pikendati aga mitu korda ühe aasta võrra.
CWP has requested a further prolongation.
CWP taotles käenduse edasist pikendamist.
According to the information submitted by Germany, the guarantee is clearly still in force.
Saksamaa andmetel on käendus ilmselt ikka veel kehtiv.
In the event of a positive Commission decision in this case, the Land of Saxony-Anhalt would consider a further prolongation of the guarantee.
Komisjoni positiivse otsuse korral antud asjus võtaks Sachsen-Anhalt'i liidumaa arvesse käenduse edasist pikendamist.
Measure 10: The remaining amount of the investment loan of EUR 4345981 (DEM 8,5 million) under Measure 8 was also covered by an 80 % guarantee from the Land of Saxony-Anhalt amounting to EUR 3476785 (DEM 6,8 million).
Meede 10: 4345981 euro (8,5 mln Saksa marga) suuruse investeerimislaenu (meede 8) järelejäänud summa oli tagatud Sachsen-Anhalti liidumaa poolse 80 % tagatisega 3476785 euro (6,8 mln Saksa marga) ulatuses.
The guarantee runs until April 2013.
Käendus lõpeb aprillis 2013.
Measure 11: Direct investment grants amounting to EUR 1937796 (DEM 3,79 million) were made on 8 July 1998.
Meede 11: 8. juulil 1998 maksti investeeringutoetusi summas 1937796 eurot (3,79 mln Saksa marka).
According to Germany, an amount of only EUR 1845764 (DEM 3,61 million) has been used up.
Vastavalt Saksamaa andmetele kasutati sellest ainult 1845764 eurot (3,61 mln Saksa marka).
Measure 12: Investment allowances totalling EUR 357904 (DEM 0,7 million).
Meede 12: investeeringusoodustused summas 357904 eurot (0,7 mln Saksa marka).
The restructuring
Ümberstruktureerimine
According to the information provided by Germany in 1997, a first restructuring effort had been undertaken in the wake of privatisation with the THA measures (Measures 1 to 3).
Saksamaa poolt 1997. aastal edastatud andmete kohaselt tehti esimesi jõupingutusi ümberstruktureerimiseks THA meetmete (meetmed 1–3) toetusel juba erastamise käigus.
However, this effort failed and in 1996 the difficulties facing CWP were caused by insufficient equity, an interruption in the supplies of raw materials and a lack of liquidity.
Ometigi need jõupingutused nurjusid ning majandusaastal 1996 sattus CWP ebapiisava omakapitali, toormaterjaliga varustamise katkemise ja puuduliku likviidsuse tõttu raskustesse.
The insufficiency of equity was due to the failure of Phosfor AG to increase its capital contribution of EUR 15339 (DEM 30000) to EUR 818067 (DEM 1,6 million) by 30 September 1994.
Omakapitali ebapiisavus oli tingitud sellest, et 30. septembrini 1994 ei suurendanud Phosfor AG oma kapitalisissemakseid 15339 eurolt (30000 Saksa margalt) 818067 eurole (1,6 mln Saksa margale).
As regards supplies, CWP counted on using elemental phosphorus as the raw material for the production of phosphoric acid, which, in turn, is the basis for the production of phosphates.
Mis toormaterjaliga varustamisse puutub, siis arvestas CWP fosforhappe tootmisel toormaterjalina elementaarse fosfori tarnimisega. Fosforhape omakorda moodustab põhialuse fosfaatide tootmisel.
Elemental phosphorus was to be supplied by Phosfor AG from Kazakhstan.
Elementaarset fosforit pidi tarnitama Phosfor AG-lt Kasahstanis.
This, however, did not take place and CWP faced supply bottlenecks for the raw material between 1995 and 1996.
Kuna need tarned jäid tulemata, siis viis see majandusaastal 1995/1996 toormaterjali varustusraskusteni.
The company only partly succeeded in making up this shortfall by buying elemental phosphorus at higher prices in other markets.
Ettevõttel õnnestus ainult osaliselt seda puudujääki korvata, ostes toormaterjali teistelt turgudelt kallimate hindadega.
Production came to a standstill, leading to losses in 1995 and 1996 that reduced considerably the company’s liquidity headroom.
See põhjustas tootmisseisaku, mille tulemuseks olid kahjumid 1995. ja 1996. aastal, nii et ettevõtte likviidsusruum tunduvalt vähenes.
The original restructuring plan
Esialgne ümberstruktureerimisplaan
In order to restore the company’s long-term viability, a sound restructuring plan was necessary.
Ettevõtte pikaajalise rentaabluse taastamiseks oli vajalik kandevõimeline ümberstruktureerimine.
Until 1996 CWP’s production was made up above all of common phosphates (low level of purity) used primarily in detergents.
Kuni 1996. aastani tootis CWP eelkõige vähese puhtusastmega fosfaate, mida enamasti kasutati pesuvahendites.
Phosphates are derived from phosphoric acid, which CWP produced both for internal consumption (processing into phosphates) and for sale to third parties.
Fosfaate saadakse fosforhappest. CWP valmistas fosforhapet nii enda tarbeks (fosfaatideks edasitöötlemine) kui ka kolmandatele osapooltele müügiks.
There are two processes for producing phosphoric acid, each using a different raw material.
Fosforhappe tootmiseks on kaks meetodit, mis kumbki kasutavad erinevat toormaterjali.
In the wet process, pure phosphoric acid is extracted from basic or crude phosphoric acid (Merchant Grade Acid, MGA) by means of a chemical reaction.
Märgmenetluse korral toodetakse puhast fosforhapet keemilise reaktsiooni abil toorfosforhappest (Merchant Grade Acid – MGA).
In the thermal process employed by CWP, pure phosphoric acid is obtained by the combustion of elemental phosphorus.
CWP poolt kasutatud termilisel tootmismeetodil saadakse puhast fosforhapet elementaarse fosfori põletamisel.
Since, according to the notification, raw phosphoric acid was easier to obtain and cheaper to process than elemental phosphorus, CWP decided under the restructuring plan to change the raw material base and, as a consequence, the production method.
Kuna toorfosforhapet on aruande kohaselt lihtsam saada ja vähem kulukas töödelda kui elementaarset fosforit, siis otsustas CWP ümberstruktureerimisplaani raames vahetada toormaterjali baasi ning järelikult ka tootmismeetodit.
This was intended to resolve the supply difficulties for elemental phosphorus from Kazakhstan.
Sellega pidi Kasahstanist elementaarse fosfori tarnimise probleem, lahendatud saama.
Germany submitted two documents which it claimed constituted the restructuring plan.
Saksamaa esitas kaks dokumenti, mis pidid kirjeldama ümberstruktureerimisplaani.
These documents contradicted the 1997 notification.
Need dokumendid on vastuolus 1997. aasta aruandega.
The first document, dated 29 May 1996 and headed ‘A new concept for continuing the business of CWP as the company that acquired the phosphorus derivatives division of Stickstoffwerke AG Wittenberg’ sums up CWP’s restructuring strategy. There are essentially two goals: firstly, to broaden the raw material base and, secondly, to extend the company’s sphere of activity.
Esimene dokument 29. maist 1996 pealkirjaga “Neues Unternehmenskonzept zur Weiterführung der CWP als Nachfolgeunternehmen des Bereiches Phosphorfolgeprodukte aus der Stickstoffwerke AG Wittenberg” (“Uus ettevõttekontseptsioon CWP jätkamiseks Stickstoffwerke AG Wittenberg fosforjäreltoodete valdkonna õigusjärgse ettevõttena”) võtab kokku CWP ümberstruktureerimisstrateegia, mis järgib peamiselt kahte eesmärki: esiteks toormaterjali baasi laiendamine ja teiseks ettevõtte tegevusvaldkonna suurendamine.
However, there was no mention in that document of the thermal production process being abandoned.
Igatahes ei mainita selles dokumendis termilise tootmismeetodi ülesannet.
On the contrary, production was to remain based on elemental phosphorus and the thermal process, although some installations would be adapted for the processing of raw phosphoric acid which CWP would buy.
Pigemini pidi tootmist jätkatama elementaarse fosfori baasil termilisel meetodil ning teatud kindlad rajatised ümber seadistatama ostetud toorfosforhappe töötlemiseks.
It was also proposed that consideration be given to building in the medium term an extraction installation for the purification of MGA, i.e. for production using the wet process.
Samuti anti tõuge arvestada keskpikas perspektiivis ekstraheerimisrajatise ehitamisega MGA puhastamiseks, s.t märgmenetlusel tootmiseks.
In the second document, dated 16 October 1996 and headed ‘Proposal for the long-term survival of CWP, including the investment and financing plan’, CWP defined its investment priorities and the manner in which they would be financed, but it did not call into question the strategy previously formulated of maintaining the thermal process while, at the same time, introducing the wet process.
Teises dokumendis 16. oktoobrist 1996 pealkirjaga “Vorschlag zur langfristigen Sicherung des Unternehmens CWP einschließlich Investitions- und Finanzierungsplan” (“Ettepanek ettevõtte CWP pikaajaliseks kestmiseks koos investeerimis- ja finantsplaaniga”) määras CWP kindlaks oma investeerimisprioriteedid ja planeeritud finantseerimise, pidamata küsitavaks eelnevalt väljatöötatud strateegiat, mis nägi ette termilise tootmismeetodi säilitamist paralleelselt märgmenetluse sisseviimisega.
Among the investment priorities was the adaptation of the existing plant and equipment to process wet phosphoric acid and the construction of the extraction installation mentioned above, the aim being to ensure by September 1998 that CWP would no longer be dependent on elemental phosphorus.
Investeerimisprioriteetide hulka kuuluvad olemasolevate rajatiste ja sisseseadete kohandamine märgfosforhappe töötlemiseks ja ülalmainitud ekstraheerimisrajatise ehitamine, nii et septembrist 1998 ei oleks CWP enam olnud sõltuv elementaarsest fosforist. Ekstraheerimisrajatise ehitamise võimalikkus oli teemaks DLMi poolt läbi viidud ekspertuuringus.
The feasibility of this extraction installation was the subject of a report by a consultant, DLM, [11] which also provided a cost study [12] putting the costs of this installation at EUR 3,07 million (DEM 6 million).
Samuti koostas DLM kulu-uuringu, [12] milles rajatise kuludeks hinnati 3,07 mln eurot (6 mln Saksa marka).
Amendment of the plan
Kontseptsioonimuudatus
In its response to the initiation of the formal investigation procedure, Germany explained that the technical plan for the construction of the extraction installation had been amended and expanded.
Vastuseks formaalse kontrollmenetluse algatamisele teatas Saksamaa, et ekstraheerimisrajatise ehitamise tehnilist kontseptsiooni olevat muudetud ja laiendatud.
A first amendment took place in December 1997, when tests revealed that post-treatment of the aid (defluoridation and concentration) was necessary in order to obtain the quality level required by the food industry.
Esimene muudatud toimus detsembris 1997, kui katsed näitasid, et toiduainetetööstuses nõutava kvaliteedi saavutamiseks on vajalik happe järeltöötlemine – defluoreerimine ja kontsentreerimine.
In February 1999 a CWP supplier who had so far provided MGA, which needed no pre-treatment, cancelled its contract.
Veebruaris 1999 ütles üks CWP hankija, kes senini oli tarninud eelpuhastust mittevajavat MAG-kvaliteediga hapet, oma hankelepingu üles.
As a result, CWP had to buy standard MGA, pre-treat it and bleach it.
Seetõttu pidi CWP ostma MAG-standardkvaliteediga hapet ning selle seejärel eelpuhastama ja värvitustama.
These two changes increased costs, led to a delay of eighteen months or so in the implementation of the plan and moreover forced CWP to expand its installations, which in turn further increased costs and compounded the delay.
Need kaks muudatust põhjustasid lisakulusid, viivitusi kontseptsiooni elluviimises umbes pooleteise aasta võrra ning sundisid lisaks sellele CWP-d oma rajatisi laiendama, mis jällegi täiendavaid kulutusi põhjustas ja kontseptsiooni elluviimist aeglustas.
The costs of the extraction installation rose from EUR 3,07 million (DEM 6 million) to EUR 7,772 million (DEM 15,1 million).
Ekstraheerimisrajatise kulud tõusid 3,07 mln eurolt (6 mln Saksa margalt) 7,772 mln euroni (15,1 mln Saksa margani).
Furthermore, in 2000 CWP faced a problem with raffinate, a highly toxic by-product.
Eelnevale lisaks osutus aastal 2000 probleemiks kõrgtoksiline kõrvaltoode rafinaat.
Germany’s response to the initiation of the formal investigation procedure indicates that CWP had hoped that third parties would further process this raffinate but it discovered in mid-2000 that there were no offers for its raffinate.
Vastuses formaalse kontrollmenetluse algatamisele tegi Saksamaa teatavaks, et CWP lootis rafinaadi edasisele ärakasutamisele kolmandate osapoolte poolt ning pidi 2000. aasta keskel konstateerima, et vastavad pakkumised puuduvad.
The resulting crisis, together with the delays in carrying out the restructuring measures brought the construction of the extraction installation to a halt.
Sellest tulenev kriis viis koos viivitustega ümberstruktureerimismeetmete elluviimisel ekstraheerimisrajatise ehitamise seiskumiseni.
The agreement, which was reached in early 2001, provided for the sale of the phosphate production to TI, as described above.
Leping sõlmiti 2001. aasta alguses ning see nägi ette fosfaaditootmise müüki TI-le, nagu ülalpool kirjeldatud.
Until the contract becomes effective, CWP will produce phosphates exclusively for TI, which will provide the raw material.
Lepingu kehtimahakkamiseni toodab CWP fosfaate eranditult TI-le ja TI tarnib toormaterjali.
Once the agreement is in force, CWP will withdraw altogether from the production of phosphates and will only produce phosphoric acid using the wet process once its extraction installation has been completed.
Pärast lepingu jõustumist tõmbub CWP fosfaaditootmisest täielikult tagasi ning hakkab niipea, kui ekstraheerimisrajatis on valmis saanud, tootma ainult fosforhappeid märgmenetlusel.
This means that new measures have to be undertaken for the closure of the installations producing thermal phosphoric acid (CWP’s traditional production method), phosphorus peroxide and sodium hypophosphite (one of the products introduced as part of the restructuring) and for the closure of the phosphorus warehouse (since phosphorous will no longer be used as a raw material).
See nõuab uute meetmete rakendamist termilise fosforhappe (CWP traditsiooniline tootmismeetod), fosforpentoksiidi, ja naatriumhüpofosfiidi (ümberstruktureerimise raames sisseviidud toode) tootmiseks kasutatavate rajatiste ning fosforilao (kuna fosforit enam toorainena ei kasutata) sulgemiseks.
CWP’s workforce is to be reduced by some 33 people.
CWP töötajaskonda vähendati umbes 33 töötaja võrra.
Germany considers that the restructuring of CWP was successfully accomplished in respect of phosphate production, which is to be taken over by TI.
Saksamaa arvamusel lõpetati TI poolt ülevõetava fosfaaditootmise ümberstruktureerimine edukalt.
As regards the production of phosphoric acid, the restructuring will be successful once TI has paid the purchase price for CWP’s assets.
Ka fosforhappe tootmisvaldkonna ümberstruktureerimine lõpeb edukalt, niipea kui TI on tasunud CWP varade eest.
CWP will then be able to complete the extraction installation and ensure its long-term viability without substantially departing from the original plan.
CWP viib pärast seda lõpuni ekstraheerimisrajatise ehitamise, tagades seeläbi oma pikaajalise elujõulisuse, esialgsest ümberstruktureerimiskontseptsioonist olulisel määral kõrvale kaldumata.
According to Germany, 90 % of the extraction installation has already been completed.
Saksamaa andmetel on ekstraheerimisrajatis juba 90 % ulatuses valmis.
Costs of the restructuring
Ümberstruktureerimise kulud
According to the document ‘Proposal for the long-term survival of CWP, including the investment and financing plan’, dated 16 October 1996, CWP needed investments totalling EUR 5,62 million (DEM 11 million) and working capital amounting to EUR 2,56 million (DEM 5 million) during the period 1996 to 2000.
Vastavalt 16. oktoobri 1996. aasta dokumendile “Vorschlag zur langfristigen Sicherung des Unternehmens CWP einschließlich Investitions- und Finanzierungsplan” vajas CWP aastatel 1996–2000 investeeringuid summas 5,62 mln eurot (11 mln Saksa marka) ja käibevahendeid summas 2,56 mln eurot (5 mln Saksa marka).
However, the same document contains an investment plan detailing investments totalling EUR 9,29 million (DEM 18,17 million).
Siiski sisaldab seesama dokument investeerimisplaani, mis näeb ette investeeringuid kogusummas üle 9,29 mln euro (18,17 mln Saksa marga).
According to the 1997 notification, restructuring costs would total EUR 12,88 million (DEM 25,2 million).
aasta teatise kohaselt on ümberstruktureerimiskulude suuruseks kokku 12,88 mln eurot (25,2 mln Saksa marka).
The restructuring measures notified in 1997 are summarised in Table 4.
aastal registreeritud ümberstruktureerimismeetmed on kokku võetud tabelis 4.
Restructuring measures
Ümberstruktureerimismeetmed
Costs
Kosten
Loss compensation (1995 to 1998)
Kahjumi kompensatsioon (1995–1998)
Investments in safety
Investeeringud tootmise tagamiseks
Restructuring investment
Ümberstruktureerimisega seotud investeeringud
Clean-up of environmental damage dating from before 1 July 1990
Enne 1.7.1990 aset leidnud keskkonnakahjustuste saneerimine
Following the initiation of the formal investigation procedure, those same costs were estimated at EUR 18,87 million (DEM 36,9 million).
Pärast formaalse kontrollmenetluse algatamist anti nendesamade kulude suuruseks 18,87 mln eurot (36,9 mln Saksa marka).
It should be noted that Table 5 contains two new items, i.e. ‘grants’ and ‘waiver of purchase price’, which constitute financial resources rather than restructuring costs.
Tuleb nentida, et tabel 5 sisaldab kahte uut rubriiki “Rahalised toetused” ja “Ostuhinna tühistamine”, mis on pigem finantsvahendid kui ümberstruktureerimiskulud.
Restructuring investments
Ümberstruktureerimisega seotud investeeringud
Cleaning-up of environmental damage dating from before 1 July 1990
Enne 1.7.1990 aset leidnud keskkonnakahjustuste saneerimine
Grants
Rahalised toetused
In its response to the information injunction, Germany divided the restructuring into two parts: restructuring of phosphate production and restructuring of the other areas (mainly phosphoric acid production).
Vastuses informeerimiskorraldusele jagas Saksamaa ümberstruktureerimise kahte ossa: fosfaaditootmise ümberstruktureerimine ja ülejäänud valdkondade (peamiselt fosforhappe tootmise) ümberstruktureerimine.
The costs of restructuring phosphate production were put at EUR 7,99 million (DEM 15,63 million) in total and include investments of EUR 4,71 million (DEM 9,21 million).
Fosfaaditootmise ümberstruktureerimiskuludeks märgiti kokku 7,99 mln eurot (15,63 mln Saksa marka) ning need hõlmavad investeeringuid 4,71 mln euro (9,21 mln Saksa marga) ulatuses.
The costs of restructuring the other business areas were estimated at EUR 27,14 million (DEM 53,08 million) in total and include investments of EUR 13,22 million (DEM 25,86 million).
Ülejäänud valdkondade ümberstruktureerimiskulude suuruseks näidati kokku 27,14 mln eurot (53,08 mln Saksa marka) ning need sisaldavad investeeringuid summas 13,22 mln eurot (25,86 mln Saksa marka).
The overall restructuring costs thus amount to EUR 35,13 million (DEM 68,71 million).
Järelikult olid ümberstruktureerimiskulud kokku 35,13 mln eurot (68,71 mln Saksa marka).