natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
acting by a qualified majority on the basis of training needs, define the rules governing how each institution is to provide the School with an adequate number of officials to serve as trainers.
määrab lähtuvalt koolitusvajadusest kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega kindlaks tingimused, millele vastavalt iga institutsioon annab kooli käsutusse piisava hulga ametnikest koolitajaid.
Appointment of staff
Töötajate ametissenimetamine
While the School is attached to the Office, the function of Principal of the School shall be carried out by the Head of the Office.
Ajal, mil kool kuulub ameti haldusalasse, täidab kooli direktori ülesandeid ameti direktor.
The Principal shall be the appointing authority for the staff of the School.
Kooli direktor nimetab ametisse kooli töötajad.
The Principal shall inform the Management Board of appointments made, contracts signed, promotions granted and disciplinary proceedings initiated against officials or other servants.
Kooli direktor teavitab juhatust ametnike ja teenistujate ametissenimetamistest, lepingute sõlmimisest, edutamistest ning distsiplinaarmenetluste algatamisest.
The officials of all Community institutions shall be informed of posts vacant within the School as soon as the Appointing Authority decides to fill those posts.
Kõikidest koolis vabanenud töökohtadest teavitatakse ühenduste kõikide institutsioonide ametnikke kohe, kui ametisse nimetav ametiisik on otsustanud ametikoha täita.
When carrying out tasks judged non-essential, the School may make use of contract staff as defined in Article 3a(1)(c) of the Conditions of employment of other servants.
Selliste ülesannete täitmiseks, mida ei peeta esmajärgulisteks, võib kool kasutada lepingulisi teenistujaid vastavalt Euroopa ühenduste muude teenistujate teenistustingimuste artikli 3a lõike 1 punktile c.
Duties of the Principal and management of staff
Kooli direktori ülesanded ja personalijuhtimine
The Principal shall be responsible for the smooth running of the School.
Direktor vastutab kooli töö tõrgeteta sujumise eest.
Within the area of responsibility of the Management Board, he or she shall act under the authority of the latter.
Juhatuse pädevusse kuuluvates küsimustes tegutseb ta juhatuse volitusel.
He or she shall provide secretarial services for the Management Board, shall report to it on the performance of his or her duties and shall submit to it any suggestion for the smooth running of the School.
Direktor tagab juhatuse sekretariaadi toimimise, annab juhatusele aru oma ülesannete täitmisest ning esitab talle ettepanekuid kooli töö tõrgeteta sujumise tagamiseks.
Administrative procedures connected with the day-to-day management of staff, such as salaries, leave, and sickness, accident and retirement insurance, shall be carried out under the same conditions as for the officials and other servants of the Commission.
Personalijuhtimisega seonduvaid haldusmenetlusi (näiteks seoses töötasu ja puhkuse, haigekassa, tööõnnetuste ja pensioniga) rakendatakse samadel tingimustel nagu komisjoni ametnike ja teenistujate puhul.
That list shall not be exhaustive and the School may extend it to cover other areas in agreement with the Commission.
Loetelu pole täielik ning kool võib komisjoniga kokku leppida muude valdkondade lisamise suhtes.
The Head of the School
Koolijuht
While the School is attached to the Office, a Head of the School shall be appointed by the Commission after obtaining the Management Board’s opinion in favour, arrived at by simple majority.
Ajal, mil kool kuulub ameti haldusalasse, nimetab komisjon pärast ameti juhatuse lihthäälteenamusega vastuvõetud heakskiitva arvamuse saamist ametisse koolijuhi.
The Management Board shall be closely involved in the procedures to be followed for appointing the Head of the School, in particular the drafting of the vacancy notice and the scrutiny of applications.
Juhatus osaleb koolijuhi ametissenimetamiseks vajalikes menetlustes, eriti ametikoha täitmiseks mõeldud konkursi väljakuulutamises ja kandidaatuuride läbivaatamisel.
The Head of the School shall be responsible, under the authority of the Head of the Office, for carrying out the duties set out in Article 2 of the Decision setting up the European Administrative School.
Koolijuht allub direktorile ning vastutab Euroopa haldusjuhtimise kooli asutamise otsuse artiklis 2 sätestatud ülesannete täitmise eest.
He or she shall attend the meetings of the Management Board which discuss points falling within his or her responsibility.
Koolijuht osaleb juhatuse koosolekutel, kus arutatakse tema pädevusse kuuluvaid küsimusi.
Financial aspects
Rahastamine
The appropriations allocated to the School, the total amount of which shall be entered in a separate budget heading within the section of the budget relating to the Commission, shall be set out in detail in an Annex to that section.
Kooli rahalised vahendid, mille kogumaht kirjendatakse eraldi eelarvereale komisjoni eelarveosas, esitatakse üksikasjalikult selle eelarveosa lisas.
That Annex shall take the form of a statement of revenue and expenditure, subdivided in the same way as the sections of the budget.
Lisa esitatakse tulude ja kulude eelarvestusena, mis on liigendatud samamoodi kui eelarveosad.
The establishment plan of the School shall be annexed to the Commission’s establishment plan.
Kooli ametikohtade loetelu lisatakse komisjoni ametikohtade loetelule.
As regards the appropriations for the School entered in the Annex hereto, the Commission shall, on the basis of a proposal from the Management Board, delegate the powers of authorising officer to the Principal of the School and shall set the limits and conditions applying to that delegation of powers.
Komisjon annab juhatuse ettepanekul kooli direktorile tulude ja kulude kinnitaja volitused lisas toodud eelarvelisi vahendite osas ning määrab kindlaks direktori volituste piirid ja tingimused.
At the end of the financial year the Management Board shall inform the budgetary authority of the breakdown of amounts obtained in return for extra services provided by the School, within the budget heading in the Annex hereto.
Mis puutub kooli osutatud tasulistesse lisateenustesse, siis esitab juhatus eelarveasutusele eelarveaasta lõpul sellisel viisil saadud summade jaotuse vastaval eelarvereal.
The School’s budget shall be drawn up and executed in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [4].
Kooli eelarve koostatakse ja seda täidetakse kooskõlas nõukogu määrusega (EÜ, Euratom) nr 1605/2002 [4].
While the School is attached to the Office, the financial provisions in paragraphs 1 to 4, and in particular the budget for the School and its staff, shall be dealt with in the context of the budget of the Office.
Ajal, mil kool kuulub ameti haldusalasse, kohaldatakse lõigetes 1–4 osutatud finantssätteid, eriti seoses kooli rahaliste vahendite ja personaliga, ameti eelarve raames.
The rules relevant to the Office’s budget shall apply.
Sellega seotud sätted kuuluvad kohaldamisele.
To make it easier to identify the resources allocated to the School while complying with the budget rules, the staff of the School shall be shown separately in the Office’s establishment plan and the operational appropriations specific to the School shall be given in a separate Article of Annex IV.
Hõlbustamaks kooli käsutuses olevate vahendite tuvastamist, pidades samas kinni eelarvereeglitest, esitatakse kooli töötajate nimekiri ameti töötajate nimekirjale lisatud eraldi tabelis ning kooli tegevuskulud IV lisa eraldi artiklis.
Review of duties
Ülesannete läbivaatamine
This Decision shall be reviewed, as regards the duties referred to in Article 1(1), at the earliest after a period of three years following the establishment of the School.
Käesoleva otsuse artikli 1 lõikes 1 nimetatud ülesanded vaadatakse läbi kõige varem kolm aastat pärast kooli asutamist.
Any changes to these duties shall require the unanimous agreement of the Secretaries-General, the Registrar of the Court of Justice and the Representative of the Ombudsman on the basis of a relevant proposal adopted by the Management Board by a qualified majority as defined in Article 5(6) of Decision 2002/621/EC in the light of a detailed report prepared by the Principal.
Ülesannete läbivaatamiseks on vajalik peasekretäride, Euroopa Kohtu sekretäri ja ombudsmani esindaja ühine kokkulepe, mis tugineb juhatuse otsuse nr 2002/621/EÜ artikli 5 lõikes 6 määratletud kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega direktori üksikasjaliku aruande alusel vastuvõetud ettepanekule.
Review of the attachment to the Office
Ameti haldusalasse kuulumise läbivaatamine
At the latest at the end of the School’s third year of activity, the Head of the Office shall prepare a detailed report to the Management Board regarding the administrative attachment of the School to the Office.
Hiljemalt kooli kolmanda tegevusaasta lõpul esitab ameti direktor juhatusele üksikasjaliku aruande kooli ameti haldusalasse kuulumise kohta.
The Management Board may decide to end this attachment by a decision taken in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 4(3) of the Decision setting up the School.
Juhatus võtab kooli asutamist käsitleva otsuse artikli 4 lõikes 3 sätestatud tingimustel vastu otsuse ameti haldusalasse kuulumise lõpetamise kohta.
Where the Management Board decides that the attachment should continue, its decision shall include a reasoned opinion.
Juhul kui juhatus otsustab haldusalasse kuulumist pikendada, tuleb asjaomasele otsusele lisada põhjendatud arvamus.
Where the Management Board decides under the procedure provided for in paragraph 1 that the attachment shall be renewed, it shall indicate in the decision the date by which it will re-examine the matter.
Juhul kui haldusnõukogu otsustab lõikes 1 ettenähtud menetluse käigus kooli ameti haldusalasse kuulumist pikendada, näidatakse otsuses tähtaeg, mille möödudes kõnealune küsimus uuesti läbi vaadatakse.
The Secretary-General
peasekretär
The Deputy General Secretary
peasekretäri asetäitja
The Registrar
kohtusekretär
See page 14 of this Official Journal.
Vt käesoleva Euroopa Liidu Teataja lehekülg 14.
Having consulted the Staff Regulations Committee, Whereas:
ning arvestades järgmist:
appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions
regioonide komitee Saksamaa liikme ametisse nimetamise kohta
Council Decision 2002/60/EC of 22 January 2002 appointed the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions [1].
Nõukogu võttis 22. jaanuaril 2002 vastu otsuse 2002/60/EÜ [1] regioonide komitee liikmete ja asendusliikmete ametisse nimetamise kohta.
a seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Maria Theresia OPLADEN, notified to the Council on 29 November 2004,
Regioonide komitees on vabanenud asendusliikme koht seoses Maria Theresia OPLADENi tagasiastumisega, millest teavitati nõukogu 29. novembril 2004,
Mr Hans-Josef VOGEL, Bürgermeister der Stadt Arnsberg, is hereby appointed alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Ms Maria Theresia OPLADEN for the remainder of her term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.
Hans-Josef VOGEL, Bürgermeister der Stadt Arnsberg, nimetatakse regioonide komitee asendusliikmeks Maria Theresia OPLADENi asemele viimase järelejäänud ametiajaks, kuni 25. jaanuarini 2006.
appointing one Portuguese member and two Portuguese alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
regioonide komitee Portugali liikme ja kahe Portugali asendusliikme ametisse nimetamise kohta
Having regard to the proposal from the Portuguese Government,
võttes arvesse Portugali valitsuse ettepanekut,
Council Decision 2002/60/EC of 22 January 2002 appointed the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions [1],
Nõukogu võttis 22. jaanuaril 2002 vastu otsuse 2002/60/EÜ [1] regioonide komitee liikmete ja asendusliikmete ametisse nimetamise kohta.
one seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Pedro SANTANA LOPES, notified to the Council on 22 July 2004, and one seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Roberto de Sousa Rocha AMARAL, notified to the Council on 7 December 2004, and one seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the nomination of Mr Manuel do Nascimento MARTINS as a member,
Regioonide komitees on vabanenud liikmekoht seoses Pedro SANTANA LOPESI tagasiastumisega, millest teavitati nõukogu 22. juulil 2004, üks regioonide komitee asendusliikme koht on vabanenud seoses Roberto de Sousa Rocha AMARALI tagasiastumisega, millest teavitati nõukogu 7. detsembril 2004, ning üks regioonide komitee asendusliikme koht on vabanenud seoses ettepanekuga nimetada Manuel do Nascimento MARTINS liikmeks,
as member:
liikmed:
Mr Manuel do Nascimento MARTINS
Manuel do Nascimento MARTINS,
in place of Mr Pedro SANTANA LOPES;
asendab Pedro SANTANA LOPESit;
Mr Vasco Ilídio ALVES CORDEIRO
Vasco Ilídio ALVES CORDEIRO,
Secretário regional da Presidência da Região Autónoma dos Açores
Secretário regional da Presidência da Região Autónoma dos Açores,
in place of Mr Roberto AMARAL;
asendab Roberto AMARALi,
Mr Manuel Joaquim BARATA FREXES
Manuel Joaquim BARATA FREXES,
Presidente da Câmara Municipal do Fundão
Presidente da Câmara Municipal do Fundão,
in place of Mr Manuel do Nascimento MARTINS;
asendab Manuel do Nascimento MARTINSit
for the remainder of their term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.
nende järelejäänud ametiajal, kuni 25. jaanuarini 2006.
Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Vila Real
Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Vila Real,
on the State aid which the Netherlands is planning to implement in favour of four shipyards to support six shipbuilding contracts
riigiabi kohta, mida Madalmaad kavatsevad anda neljale laevatehasele kuue laevaehituslepingu jaoks
(notified under document number C(2004) 2213)
(teatavaks tehtud numbri K(2004) 2213 all)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut ja eriti selle artikli 88 lõike 2 esimest alapunkti,
Having regard to the Commission Framework on State aid to shipbuilding [1],
võttes arvesse komisjoni laevaehitusele antavat abi käsitlevat raamistikku, [1]
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments [2], pursuant to the provisions cited above and having regard to their comments,
on nimetatud sätete kohaselt palunud huvitatud isikutel esitada oma märkused [2] ja võtnud need märkused arvesse.
By letters dated 9 September 2002, The Netherlands notified the Commission of the aid.
Madalmaad teavitasid 9. septembri 2002 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjas komisjoni abist.
By letters dated 30 January 2003, 16 May 2003, 16 July 2003 and 16 September 2003, it provided the Commission with further information.
Komisjonile saadeti lisateavet 30. jaanuari 2003, 16. mai 2003, 16. juuli 2003 ja 16. septembri 2003 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjadega.
By letter dated 11 November 2003, the Commission informed The Netherlands that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Komisjon teavitas 11. novembri 2003 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjas Madalmaid otsusest algatada kõnealuse abi suhtes EÜ asutamislepingu artikli 88 lõike 2 kohane menetlus.
The Netherlands replied by letters dated 28 November 2003 and 12 December 2003.
Madalmaad vastasid 28. novembri 2003 ja 12. detsembri 2003 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjadega.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisjoni otsus menetluse algatamisest on avalikustatud Euroopa Liidu Teatajas.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisjon palub huvitatud isikutel esitada selle abiga seonduvad märkused.
The Commission received comments from interested parties.
Komisjon on saanud huvitatud isikutelt märkuseid.
It forwarded them to The Netherlands, which was given the opportunity to react; its comments were received by letter dated 23 March 2004.
Komisjon edastas märkused Madalmaadele kommenteerimiseks ning sai kommentaarid 23. märtsi 2004 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjaga.
The notifications propose to give aid for a total of EUR 21,6 million, in the form of grants, in support of six shipbuilding contracts to four Dutch shipyards: Bodewes Scheepswerven BV; Bodewes Scheepswerven Volharding Foxhol; Scheepswerf Visser; and Scheepswerf de Merwede.
Kõnealust abi on kavandatud anda toetustena kokku 21,6 miljoni euro ulatuses kuuele laevaehituslepingule. Lepingud on sõlmitud nelja Hollandi laevatehasega: Bodewes Scheepswerven BV, Bodewes Scheepswerven Volharding Foxhol, Scheepswerf Visser ja Scheepswerf de Merwede.
The aid has been offered to the yards, subject to the Commission’s approval.
Abi pakuti laevatehastele eeldusel, et komisjon on selle heaks kiitnud.
The purpose of the notified aid is to match aid allegedly offered by Spain to certain private Spanish shipyards which competed for the contracts referred to above.
Nimetatud abi eesmärgiks on kohandada seda abiga, mille Hispaania on Madalmaade väitel andnud mõnedele Hispaania eralaevatehastele, mis konkureerivad eespool mainitud lepingute saamise eest.
According to The Netherlands, the alleged Spanish aid implied a price discount of between 9 and 13 %.
Madalmaade andmeil väidetav Hispaania poolt eraldatud abi tähendas 9–13 protsendilist hinnaalandust.
The Dutch shipyards received all the concerned orders and the ships are under construction or have already been delivered.
Kõik kõnealused tellimused läksid Madalmaade laevatehastele. Osa laevadest on hetkel ehitamisel ja osa on juba üle antud.
Details of the notified Dutch aid are presented in table 1 below.
Teatatud Madalmaade poolt antud abi puudutavad andmed on esitatud tabelis 1.
Notified aid, ships and benefiting shipyards
Teatatud abi, laevad ja abi saanud laevatehased
Notification No
Teatise number
Beneficiary Shipyard
Abi saanud laevatehas
Ships
Laevad
Aid amount
Abi suurus
4 container ships
4 konteinerlaeva
3 ro-ro vessels
3 ro-ro tüüpi laeva
Arctic Trawler
Arktika traaler
4 multi-purpose freight vessels
4 mitmeotstarbelist prahilaeva
6 container ships
6 konteinerlaeva
2 hopper dredgers
2 süvendus-ekskavaatorit
Legal basis — the aid scheme
Õiguslik alus – abikava
According to the Netherlands, the proposed aid may be granted under the so-called heavy matching provisions (Matchingfonds zwaar) of the Decision on export credit subsidies (Besluit subsidies exportfinancieringsarrangementen, hereinafter called BSE), as first approved by the Commission, letter of 24 June 1992 (SG(92) D/8272 — aid number N 134/92) [4].
Madalmaade ametiasutuste arvamuse kohaselt võib kavandatavat abi anda vastavalt ekspordikrediidi toetusi käsitlevas kavas (Besluit subsidies exportfinancieringsarrangementen, BSE) sisalduvatele niinimetatud kohandamissätetele (Matchingfonds zwaar), mille komisjon kiitis esimest korda heaks 24. juuni 1992 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjaga (SG (92) D/8272 – abi N 134/92).
The BSE was subject to various amendments, among which the most important was approved by the Commission in a letter dated 12 December 1997, reference SG(97) D/10395 (aid number N 337/97) [5].
Kavva on mitmel korral sisse viidud muudatusi, mis on täpsemalt komisjoni poolt heaks kiidetud 12. detsembri 1997 kuupäevaga dateeritud kirjas (SG(97) D/10395 (abi N 337/97).
In this decision the scheme was approved for the period of 1997 to the end of 2002.
Otsusega kiideti kava heaks alates 1997. aastast kuni 2002. aasta lõpuni.
Grounds for initiating the procedure
Menetluse alustamise põhjus
The opening of the procedure addressed doubts in the following areas:
Menetlust alustati järgnevate asjaoludega seonduvate kahtluste tõttu:
the Commission considered that granting aid to match alleged illegal aid from another EC Member State is contrary to the EC Treaty and therefore had doubts that the notified aid could be compatible.
komisjoni arvates on abi, mida tahetakse kohandada mõne teise ELi liikmesriigi poolt antud ebaseadusliku abiga, vastuolus EÜ asutamislepinguga ja komisjon kahtleb selle ühisturuga kokkusobivuses.
In this context it had doubts that the approval of the Dutch scheme included the right to match aid provided from another EU Member State;
Sellega seoses kahtles komisjon, kas Madalmaade abikava vastu võtmine oleks õigustanud kohandamist ELi mõne teise liikmesriigi poolt antud abiga;
even if the scheme would allow for such intra-EU matching, the Commission had doubts as to the fulfilment of the procedures in establishing the existence of illegal aid to match;
kuigi selline kohandamine olekski kava põhjal ELis lubatud, kahtleb komisjon, kas juhtumis järgitakse menetlusi reeglitevastase abi andmiseks “kohandamise eeldusel”;
the Commission further had doubts that the aid could be approved on the basis of Article 3(4) of the shipbuilding Regulation [6], since that Article concerns export credits to shipowners while the Netherlands notified grants to the shipyards.
lisaks sellele kahtleb komisjon, kas abi võib heaks kiita nõukogu laevaehitusmääruse [6] artikli 3 lõike 4 alusel, sest kõnealune artikkel käsitleb laevaomanikele antavaid ekspordikrediite, Madalmaade teatis aga hoopis laevatehastele antavat abi.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
HUVITATUD ISIKUTE MÄRKUSED
Comments were received from the representative of the beneficiaries and from a party requesting his identity not to be disclosed.
Märkuseid saadi abisaajate esindajatelt ning kolmandalt osapoolelt, kes palus oma isikut mitte avalikustada. Kõigi nende isikute arvates tuleks abi heaks kiita.
All these parties argue that the aid should be approved, stressing among other things that the Commission had approved the matching scheme, that the presented proof of the alleged Spanish aid was sufficient, and that the Spanish denial that the aid would be available was not sufficiently explicit.
Sellega seoses rõhutavad nad, et komisjon kiitis heaks kohandamiskava ning et väidetava Hispaania antud abi kohta esitati piisavalt tõendeid. Lisaks sellele ei eitanud Hispaania nende arvates abi mitteandmist piisavalt selgelt.
The representative of the beneficiaries further argued that there is nothing in the Commission’s decisions approving the scheme, or in the text of the scheme, that suggests that the matching would only be allowed if the competitor originates from a third (non-EU) country.
Lisaks tõdeb abisaajate esindaja, et kava vastuvõtmist käsitlevates komisjoni otsustes ega kava käsitlevate dokumentide tekstides ei viidata kuskil sellele, et abi kohandamine oleks lubatud ainult juhul, kui oleks tegemist ELi välise kolmandast riigist pärineva konkurendiga.
It also argues that the planned aid is based on an approved scheme and therefore is existing aid, which therefore should not be assessed on the basis of the shipbuilding Regulation.
Lisaks sellele teatas ta, et abi aluseks on heakskiidetud kava ja seetõttu on tegemist kehtiva abiga, mille tõttu ei saa seda hinnata laevaehitusmääruse alusel.
COMMENTS FROM THE NETHERLANDS
MADALMAADE MÄRKUSED
The Netherlands claims to have acted within the rules (the BSE scheme) governing heavy matching, which were authorised by the Commission and which are in accordance with the relevant OECD procedures.
Madalmaade arvates tegutses ta kohandamiseeskirjade (BSE-kava) kohaselt. Komisjon kiitis need eeskirjad heaks ja need on asjassepuutuvate OECD eeskirjadega kooskõlas.
The Netherlands maintains that the BSE scheme does not exclude matching against alleged aid provided by another EU Member State and that the procedures have shown with sufficient certainty that there was indeed Spanish aid.
Madalmaad osutavad, et BSE-kava ei välista abi kohandamist juhul, kui tegemist on mõne teise ELi liikmesriigi poolt antud abiga. Selle kohaselt on menetlustes võidud piisava kindlusega tõdeda, et Hispaania on tõepoolest abi andnud.
The Netherlands therefore considers that it is entitled to proceed with the matching and that the beneficiaries have legitimate expectations to receive the aid.
Seepärast leiavad Madalmaad, et neil on õigus anda kohandatud abi ja et abisaajatel on õiguspärane ootus sellise abi andmisele.