natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Monsanto Europe SA, Brussels and Antwerp, Belgium
Monsanto Europe S.A., Brüssel ja Antverpen, Belgia
, (including also the related distributor Monsanto UK Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
, (kaasa arvatud sidusturustaja Monsanto UK Ltd., Cambridge, Ühendkuningriik
Syngenta UK, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
Syngenta UK, Huddersfield, Ühendkuningriik
(including also the related companies: Stauffer Chemical BV, Seneffe, Belgium
(kaasa arvatud sidusettevõtted: Stauffer Chemical BV, Seneffe, Belia
and Syngenta Supply AG, Basel, Switzerland
ja Syngenta Supply AG, Basel, Šveits
, and the related distributor Syngenta Crop Protection, Whittlesford, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
, ja sidusturustaja Syngenta Crop Protection, Whittlesford, Cambridgeshire, Ühendkuningriik
Producer in the market economy third country:
Kolmanda turumajandusriigi tootja:
Monsanto do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil
Monsanto do Brasil, São Paulo, Brasiilia
The investigation into the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping in the review investigations covered the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002 (the IP).
Uurimine dumpingu jätkumise või kordumise tõenäosuse kohta hõlmas ajavahemikku 1. jaanuarist 2002 kuni 31. detsembrini 2002 (edaspidi “uurimisperiood”).
The examination of trends in the context of the analysis of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from January 1999 to the end of the IP (the analysis period).
Kahju jätkumise või kordumise tõenäosuse kindlakstegemise seisukohalt asjakohaste suundumuste uurimine hõlmas ajavahemikku jaanuarist 1999 kuni uurimisperioodi lõpuni (edaspidi “analüüsiperiood”).
Market economy treatment (MET) and individual treatment
Turumajanduslik kohtlemine ja individuaalne kohtlemine
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, two Chinese companies, Zhejiang Xinan Industrial Group Ltd (Xinanchem) and Zhenjiang Jiagnan Chemical Factory (Zhenjiang), requested MET and individual treatment.
Vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktile b taotlesid kaks Hiina äriühingut, Zhejiang Xinan Industrial Group Ltd (edaspidi “Xinanchem”) ja Zhenjiang Jiagnan Chemical Factory (edaspidi “Zhenjiang”), turumajanduslikku ja individuaalset kohtlemist.
However, it was found that Zhenjiang had no exports of the product concerned into the Community during the IP.
Siiski leiti, et Zhenjiang ei eksportinud uurimisperioodi jooksul ühendusse vaatlusalust toodet.
Therefore, the request for MET and individual treatment of Zhenjiang became irrelevant.
Seetõttu muutus Zhenjiangi turumajandusliku ja individuaalse kohtlemise taotlus tähtsusetuks.
Xinanchem was required to complete a MET claim form detailing all the relevant information required.
Xinanchemil tuli täita turumajandusliku kohtlemise taotluse vorm ning esitada seal kogu vajalik teave.
Although the majority of the shares of the company were owned by private persons, due to the wide dispersion of the non State-owned shares, together with that fact that the State owned by far the biggest block of shares, the company was found to be under State control.
Kuigi äriühingu enamusaktsiad kuulusid eraisikutele, leiti, et äriühing on riigi kontrolli all riigi omandis mitteolevate aktsiate hajususe tõttu ning selle tõttu, et riigile kuulub suurim aktsiapakk.
Moreover, the board of directors was in fact appointed by the State shareholders and the majority of the directors of the board were either State officials or officials of State-owned enterprises.
Lisaks nimetatakse direktorite nõukogu riiki esindavate aktsionäride poolt ning enamik direktoreid on riigiametnikud või riigi osalusega äriühingute ametnikud.
Therefore, it was determined that the company was under a significant State control and influence.
Seetõttu otsustati, et äriühing on märkimisväärselt riigi kontrolli ja mõju all.
Moreover, it was established that the government of the PRC had entrusted the China Chamber of Commerce Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers and Exporters (CCCMC) with the right of contract stamping and verifying export prices for customs clearance.
Lisaks tehti kindlaks, et Hiina Rahvavabariigi valitsus oli andnud Hiina metalli-, mineraalide ja kemikaalide importijate ja eksportijate kaubanduskojale (China Chamber of Commerce Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers and Exporters, CCCMC) õiguse tembeldada lepinguid ja kontrollida ekspordihindu tollivormistuse jaoks.
This system included the setting of a minimum price for glyphosate exports and it allowed the CCCMC to veto exports that did not respect these prices.
See süsteem võimaldas kehtestada glüfosaadi ekspordile miinimumhinna ja lubada CCCMC-l keelata eksport, mis ei järginud neid hindu.
Consequently, after consulting the Advisory Committee, it was decided not to grant MET to Xinanchem on the basis that the company did not meet all the criteria set in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Pärast nõuandekomiteega konsulteerimist otsustati Xinanchemi puhul mitte rakendada turumajanduslikku kohtlemist, kuna äriühing ei vastanud kõigile algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 7 punktis c sätestatud tingimustele.
As Xinanchem was not granted market economy status, the company applied for individual treatment, i.e. the determination of an individual dumping margin on the basis of its individual export prices.
Kuna Xinanchemile ei antud turumajanduslikku staatust, taotles äriühing individuaalset kohtlemist, st individuaalse dumpingumarginaali kindlaksmääramist tema individuaalsete ekspordihindade alusel.
The Commission verified whether this company enjoyed, both in fact and in law, the necessary degree of independence from the State for setting its export price.
Komisjon kontrollis nii tegelikult kui ka õiguslikult, kas äriühing oli oma ekspordihindade määramisel riigist vajalikul määral sõltumatu.
In this respect, it was established that Xinanchem was subject to significant State control with regard to setting of its export prices of the product concerned as explained in recital 14.
Selles suhtes tehti kindlaks, et Xinanchem oli kõnealuse toote ekspordihindade määramisel märkimisväärse riigi kontrolli all, nagu põhjenduses 14 on kirjeldatud.
It was, therefore, concluded that Xinanchem did not meet the necessary requirements for individual treatment as set in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Seetõttu jõuti järeldusele, et Xinanchem ei vasta individuaalseks kohtlemiseks vajalikele nõuetele, nagu on sätestatud algmääruse artikli 9 lõikes 5.
The product concerned is glyphosate originating in the PRC (the product concerned), currently classifiable within CN codes ex29310095 (TARIC codes 2931009581 and 2931009582) and ex38083027 (TARIC codes 3808302711 and 3808302719).
Vaatlusalune toode on Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinev glüfosaat (edaspidi “vaatlusalune toode”), mis kuulub CN-koodi ex29310095 (TARICi koodid 2931009581 ja 2931009582) ja ex38083027 (TARICi koodid 3808302711 ja 3808302719) alla.
The product concerned is the same as in the investigation leading to the imposition of the original measures (the original investigation).
Vaatlusalune toode on sama toode, mille uurimine viis esialgsete meetmete kehtestamiseni (edaspidi “esialgne uurimine”).
Glyphosate is a non-selective herbicide which can exist in different grades or forms of concentration of which the main ones are acid, salt and formulated product.
Glüfosaat on mitteselektiivne herbitsiid, mida võib toota erinevates kontsentratsioonides ja vormides, millest tähtsamad on hape, sool ja retseptisegu.
Acid is the basic form of the chemical resulting from the manufacture process and is usually found as a dry powder, with 95 % glyphosate content, or as wet cake, with 84 % glyphosate content, the difference being due only to the moisture content remaining.
Hape on kemikaali tootmisprotsessi tulemusena tekkiv põhivorm ning esineb tavaliselt 95 %lise glüfosaadisisaldusega pulbri või 84 %lise glüfosaadisisaldusega märja koogi kujul, mille erinevus seisneb ainult niiskusesisalduses.
Salt is a soluble form of glyphosate which is made from acid.
Sool on glüfosaadi lahustuv vorm, mida valmistatakse happest.
It is a liquid, normally containing 62 % IPA salt [7] content which is equivalent to a glyphosate content of 43 %.
See on vedelik, mis sisaldab tavaliselt 62 % isopropüülamiinsoola, [7] mis võrdub 43 %lise glüfosaadisisaldusega.
Formulated glyphosate is generally in a liquid form consisting of a mixture of glyphosate salt, water and other chemicals, such as surfactants and additives which enable the herbicide to be absorbed into the plants and improve effectiveness.
Glüfosaat retseptiseguna esineb tavaliselt vedelikuna, mis koosneb glüfosaatsoola, vee ja muude kemikaalide, nagu pindaktiivsed ained ja lisandid, mis võimaldavad herbitsiidil taimedesse imenduda ja efektiivsust parandada, segud.
The typical standard form of formulated glyphosate contains 360 grams/litre of glyphosate.
Glüfosaadi retseptisegu tavaline standardvorm sisaldab glüfosaati 360g/l.
In order to reduce the costs of transportation, importers normally purchase glyphosate in a concentrated form (usually acid or wet cake, but also salt) and further process (formulate) it by adding water and other chemicals in order to obtain formulated glyphosate, which is the only form that can be used as an end-product, i.e. as a non-selective herbicide.
Transpordikulude vähendamiseks ostavad importijad glüfosaati tavaliselt kontsentreeritud kujul (tavaliselt happe või märja koogina, aga ka soolana) ning töötlevad seda edasi (teevad retseptisegu), lisades vett ja muid kemikaale, et saada glüfosaadi retseptisegu, mis on ainuke vorm, mida võib kasutada lõpptootena, st mitteselektiivse herbitsiidina.
In view of this, importers and formulators were treated as one group (importers/formulators) for the purposes of the investigation.
Seda silmas pidades vaadeldi importijaid ja retseptisegu tegijaid uurimise käigus ühe rühmana (edaspidi “importijad/retseptisegu tegijad”).
Glyphosate produced and sold in the Community by the Community producers requesting the expiry review and glyphosate produced in the PRC and sold in the Community by the Chinese exporting producers share the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics as well as the same uses and are therefore considered to be like products, within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ühenduse tootjate toodetud ja ühenduses müüdav glüfosaat, mille suhtes taotletakse dumpinguvastaste tollimaksude kehtivuse pikendamise kontrollmenetlust, ning Hiinas toodetav ja Hiina eksportivate tootjate ühenduses müüdav glüfosaat on samade peamiste füüsikaliste, tehniliste ja keemiliste omaduste ja kasutusaladega ning neid vaadeldakse seetõttu algmääruse artikli 1 lõikes 4 määratletud tähenduses samasuguste toodetena.
It was also established that glyphosate produced and sold domestically in the market economy third country (the analogue country), i.e. Brazil, had the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics as well as the same uses as glyphosate produced in the PRC and exported to the Community.
Samuti tehti kindlaks, et kolmandates turumajandusriikides (edaspidi “võrdlusmaa”), nt Brasiilias toodetav ja siseturul müüdav glüfosaat on samade füüsikaliste, tehniliste ja keemiliste omaduste ja kasutusalaga kui Hiina Rahvavabariigis toodetav ja ühendusse eksporditav glüfosaat.
Therefore, they were considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Seetõttu vaadeldi neid algmääruse artikli 1 lõike 4 tähenduses samasuguste toodetena.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
DUMPINGU JÄTKUMISE VÕI KORDUMISE TÕENÄOSUS
Two Chinese companies cooperated in the investigations.
Kaks Hiina äriühingut tegid uurimises koostööd.
However, only one of them (Xinanchem) had exports of the product concerned to the Community during the IP (hereafter the Chinese exporting producer).
Neist ettevõtetest eksportis uurimisperioodi ajal vaatlusalust toodet ühendusse siiski ainult üks ettevõte (Xinanchem) (edaspidi “Hiina eksportiv tootja”).
Consequently, the cooperation of the other company (Zhenjiang) was limited to the expiry review investigation.
Seega piirdus teise äriühingu (Zhenjiang) koostöö aegumisega seotud kontrollmenetlusega.
The total quantity of glyphosate originating in the PRC imported during the IP is less than 50 % of the quantity imported during the investigation period of the original investigation (12 months to end August 1995).
Uurimisperioodi ajal imporditud Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva glüfosaadi koguhulk moodustas vähem kui 50 % esialgse uurimise (12 kuud kuni 1995. aasta augusti lõpuni) uurimisperioodi ajal imporditud glüfosaadi kogusest.
Since consumption was increasing, the market share held by imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC decreased more significantly over the same period.
Sellest ajast peale kui tarbimine kasvas, vähenes Hiina Rahvavabariigist imporditud vaatlusaluse toote turuosa samal perioodil veelgi enam.
From 11 % during the investigation period of the original investigation, it decreased to below 3 % at the start of the analysis period and to less than 2 % in 2001, but subsequently increased during the IP while still remaining below 2 %.
11 %lt esialgse uurimise uurimisperioodi ajal vähenes see vähem kui 3 %le analüüsiperioodi alguses ja vähem kui 2 %le 2001. aastal, ent suurenes uurimisperioodi ajal, jäädes siiski alla 2 %.
Analogue country
Võrdlusmaa
Since the PRC is considered to be an economy in transition, the Commission had to determine in this case the normal value on the basis of data obtained from producers in a market economy third country, in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Et Hiina Rahvavabariiki peetakse üleminekujärgus oleva majandusega riigiks, pidi komisjon kõnealusel juhul kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 2 lõikega 7 kindlaks määrama normaalväärtuse kolmanda turumajandusriigi tootjatelt saadud andmete põhjal.
For this purpose, the Commission suggested Brazil in the Notice of initiation which was also the analogue country used in the investigation leading to the imposition of the measures.
Algatamisteates pakkus komisjon selleks riigiks Brasiiliat, mida kasutati võrdlusmaana ka meetme kehtestamisele viinud uurimises.
All interested parties were given the opportunity to comment on the choice of analogue country envisaged.
Kõigile huvitatud isikutele anti võimalus avaldada ettenähtud võrdlusmaa valiku kohta arvamust.
The Chinese exporting producer argued that a country with a more appropriate level of economic development to the PRC should be used and that an analogue country situated in Asia would offer a better point of comparison.
Hiina eksportiv tootja väitis, et kasutada tuleks riiki, mis on oma majandusliku arengu tasemelt Hiina Rahvavabariigile kõige vastavam ning et võrdlusmaa asumine Aasias annaks parema võrdlusbaasi.
It is to be noted that the same level of economic development is, as such, not relevant for the purpose of establishing the normal value.
Tuleks märkida, et majandusliku arengu sama tase ei ole normaalväärtuse määramisel vajalik.
Even though no substantiated proposals for an analogue country other than Brazil were made, the Commission inquired from Taiwanese and Malaysian known producers of the product concerned about their willingness to provide the necessary information.
Kuigi võrdlusmaa kohta ei tehtud peale Brasiilia muid ettepanekuid, küsis komisjon Malaisia ja Taiwani vaatlusaluse toote teadaolevatelt tootjatelt nende valmisolekut anda vajalikku teavet.
However, these producers in Taiwan and Malaysia submitted that both of these markets were strongly influenced by low-priced imports of glyphosate originating in the PRC and that the prices in these countries were not representative.
Taiwani ja Malaisia tootjad teatasid, et mõlema riigi turgu mõjutab tugevalt Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva odava glüfosaadi import ning et nende riikide hinnad ei ole representatiivsed.
One producer in Taiwan considered that other countries, such as Brazil, were more suitable for this purpose.
Üks Taiwani tootja arvas, et muud riigid, nt Brasiilia, oleksid selleks otstarbeks sobivamad.
As a result no further cooperation of these producers was achieved.
Nende tootjatega edasise koostööni ei jõutud.
The Chinese exporting producer in the PRC submitted also that information concerning Brazil would be provided by an affiliated related company of a member of the applicant and that the Commission should rather use independent and properly verifiable information for the purpose of establishing normal value.
Hiina eksportiv tootja teatas, et Brasiiliat puudutav teave pärines taotleja liikme sidusettevõtjalt ning et komisjon peaks kasutama normaalväärtuse kindlaksmääramisel sõltumatut ja kontrollitavat teavet.
However, it was considered that the fact that one company in the proposed analogue country is a related company of a member of the applicant did not preclude that the information obtained could be reliable and verifiable.
Leiti, et asjaolu, et esitatud võrdlusmaa üks ettevõte on taotleja liikme sidusettevõte, ei välista, et saadud teave on usaldusväärne ja kontrollitav.
Special attention was paid to the necessity to eliminate any possible effects of the relationship in determining the normal value.
Erilist tähelepanu pöörati vajadusele kõrvaldada normaalväärtuse kindlaksmääramisel kõik sõltuvuse võimalikud mõjud.
Since Brazil was considered a reasonable choice, with producers willing to cooperate and using a comparable production process, and particularly taking into account that Brazil was the analogue country used in the investigation leading to the imposition of the measures, Brazil was chosen as the analogue country.
Et Brasiiliat peeti mõistlikuks valikuks, mille tootjad olid koostöövalmis ning kasutasid võrreldavat tootmisprotsessi, ning arvestades eriti seda, et Brasiiliat kasutati võrdlusmaana meetmete kehtestamisele viinud uurimises, valiti võrdlusmaaks Brasiilia.
The Commission sought to obtain the necessary information from the two known producers in the country, i.e. Monsanto do Brasil (Mobras) and Nortox.
Komisjon küsis vajalikku teavet riigi kahelt teadaolevalt tootjalt, st Monsanto do Brasil (edaspidi “Mobras”) ja Nortox.
The Commission was ultimately able to obtain information only from Mobras, which is a company related to a member of the applicant.
Komisjon sai teavet ainult Mobrasest, mis on taotleja liikme sidusettevõte.
It was determined that the domestic sales of this company were representative in relation to the volume of the product concerned sold by the Chinese exporting producer to the Community.
Tehti kindlaks, et selle ettevõtte omamaine müük oli representatiivne vaatlusaluse toote Hiina eksportiva tootja ühendusse müüdava müügimahu suhtes.
Normal value was calculated for all forms of glyphosate produced and sold in Brazil, i.e. glyphosate acid and different formulations based on their concentration.
Normaalväärtus arvutati kõigi Brasiilias toodetud ja müüdud glüfosaadivormide, st glüfosaathappe ja nende kontsentratsioonil põhinevate erinevate retseptisegude suhtes.
It was established that the product types sold on the domestic market of Brazil were not comparable to the product types sold by the said exporting producer to the Community.
Tehti kindlaks, et Brasiilia siseturul müüdavad tooteliigid ei ole võrreldavad nimetatud eksportiva tootja ühendusse müüdavate toodetega.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed on the basis of the manufacturing costs plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A) and for profit.
Seetõttu leiti normaalväärtus kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 2 lõikega 3 tootmiskulude alusel, millele liideti juurde mõistlikud müügi-, üld- ja halduskulud (MÜH) ning kasum.
The SG&A costs and profit were determined on the basis of Mobras' domestic sales of the like product.
MÜH ja kasum määrati kindlaks Mobrase samasuguse toote omamaise müügi alusel.
In this regard it is noted that Mobras sourced the major part of its raw materials for glyphosate production from a related company in Brazil.
Selles suhtes märgitakse, et Mobras hankis suurema osa glüfosaadi tootmiseks vajalikust toorainest Brasiilias asuvast sidusettevõttest.
The profit level of the related company was adjusted to a lower level, when determining the cost of acquisition of raw material used in the calculation of the manufacturing costs.
Sidusettevõtte kasumimäära vähendati tootmiskulude arvutamisel kasutatud tooraine hankekulude määramisel.
The amounts for SG&A and for profits were based on actual data pertaining to sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of glyphosate, by Mobras.
MÜH ja kasumi suurus põhines tavakaubanduses Mobrase glüfosaadi müügitehingu tegelikel andmetel.
All export sales of the Chinese exporting producer to the Community were made directly to independent customers in the Community and the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices paid or payable.
Kogu ekspordimüük Hiina eksportivalt tootjalt ühendusse toimus otse sõltumatutele klientidele ning ekspordihind määrati kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 2 lõikega 8 kindlaks makstud või makstava hinna alusel.
The comparison of the data concerning exports to the Community provided by the Chinese exporting producer and the total volume of imports originating in the PRC as determined in recital 58 below, indicated that the level of cooperation was low, since these exports represented less than 26 % of total Community imports from the PRC during the IP.
Hiina eksportiva tootja ühendusse toimunud asjassepuutuvat eksporti puudutavate andmete ja Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva impordi kogumahu võrdlus, nagu on toodud alljärgnevas põhjenduses 58, näitas, et koostöö tase oli madal, kuna see eksport moodustas uurimisperioodil Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinevast impordist ühendusse vähem kui 26 %.
For the purposes of a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences which were claimed and demonstrated to affect price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Normaalväärtuse ja ekspordihinna õiglase võrdluse huvides võeti vastavalt algmääruse artikli 2 lõikele 10 kohanduste näol nõuetekohaselt arvesse väidetavaid ja ilmnenud erinevusi, mis mõjutavad hinna võrreldavust.
On this basis, adjustments were made where appropriate with regard to indirect taxes, discounts, transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing, credit and commissions.
Sellest lähtuvalt tehti vajaduse korral kaudsete maksude, allahindluste, transpordi, kindlustuse, käitlemise, laadimise ning kõrvalkulude, pakendamise, laenu- ja komisjonitasudega seotud kohandusi.
The adjustments in the export price in respect of inland freight in the exporting country, packing costs and credit costs were made based on the costs established in the analogue country.
Ekspordihindu kohandati sisemaaveokulude, pakendamiskulude ja laenukulude suhtes võrdlusmaal kindlaksmääratud kulude alusel.
The comparison between normal value and export price was made on an ex-works basis.
Normaalväärtuse ja ekspordihinna võrdlus põhines tehasehinnal.
Dumping margins
Dumpingumarginaal
A comparison of the normal value and the export price of the Chinese exporting producer showed a dumping margin of 28,7 % during the IP.
Normaalväärtuse ja Hiina eksportiva tootja ekspordihinna võrdlus andis uurimisperioodil dumpingumarginaaliks 28,7 %.
In the absence of individual treatment being granted to this exporting producer, an overall dumping margin was calculated for the whole of the PRC.
Et kõnealuse eksportiva tootja puhul ei rakendatud individuaalset kohtlemist, arvutati välja üldine dumpingumarginaal kogu Hiina Rahvavabariigi jaoks.