natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This development should be seen in the light of the fact that the Community industry, when faced with low-priced imports originating in Russia and the PRC, had the choice of either maintaining its sales prices at the expense of a negative development of its sales volume and market share, or to lower its sales prices in order to preserve as far as possible economies of scale.
Seda arengut tuleb vaadelda seoses asjaoluga, et ühenduse tootmisharul oli Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit madalahinnalise impordi puhul võimalus kas säilitada müügihinnad oma müügimahu ja turuosa negatiivse arengu kulul või alandada oma müügihindu, et tagada võimalikult suur majanduslik mastaabisääst.
All Community producers lowered their sales prices as from 2001 in an effort to maintain or even increase their volume of sales in order to reach the critical mass of production needed to cover their fixed costs.
Kõik ühenduse tootjad alandasid oma müügihindu 2001. aastast, et säilitada või isegi suurendada oma müügimahtu ja saavutada oma püsikulude katmiseks vajalik tootmise kriitiline mass.
EC sales (tonnes)
Müük ühenduses (tonnides)
The Community industry’s market share increased in volume from 26,1 % in 2001 to 32,9 % in the IP.
Ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa kasvas 26,1 protsendilt 2001. aastal 32,9 protsendile uurimisperioodil.
It is noted that the stock levels of the Community industry slightly declined during the period under consideration, but shall be nevertheless considered as globally stable.
Märgitakse, et ühenduse tootmisharu varud vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul küll vähenesid, kuid tuleb sellegipoolest lugeda üldiselt stabiilseteks.
This is in line with the Community industry’s policy to maintain stock levels at a minimum.
Ühenduse tootmisharu põhimõtte kohaselt tuleb varud hoida minimaalsel tasemel.
Consequently, the level of stocks was found not to be a significant indicator in the assessment of the situation of the Community industry.
Seepärast leiti, et varude tase ei ole ühenduse tootmisharu olukorra hindamiseks oluline näitaja.
It is also noted that stocks were at levels considered normal in this industry.
Samuti märgitakse, et varud olid selle tootmisharu jaoks harilikuks peetaval tasemel.
Stock (tonnes)
Varud (tonnides)
Prices and factors affecting domestic prices
Hinnad ja omamaiseid hindu mõjutavad tegurid
Average prices per tonne of the Community industry have dropped significantly between 2001 and the IP, by 22 %.
Ühenduse tootmisharu keskmised tonnihinnad on 2001. aastast uurimisperioodini oluliselt ehk 22 % võrra langenud.
This constant price decline over the period under consideration is a key factor in the assessment of the case.
See pidev hinnalangus vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul on käesoleva küsimuse uurimisel väga tähtis tegur.
It is noted that the price decline of Russian and Chinese imports was even considerably higher than that of the Community industry.
Märgitakse, et Vene ja Hiina impordi hinna langus oli isegi ühenduse tootmisharu omast suurem.
Average selling price (EUR/tonnes)
Keskmine müügihind (EUR/t)
While Community consumption declined by 9 % between 2001 and the IP, the market share of the Community industry grew by 6,8 percentage points from 26,1 % in 2001 to 32,9 % in the IP.
Kuigi ühenduse tarbimine vähenes 2001. aasta ja uurimiseperioodi vahel 9 % võrra, kasvas ühenduse tootmisharu turuosa 6,8 protsendipunkti võrra 26,1 protsendilt 2001. aastal 32,9 protsendile uurimisperioodil.
Investments (in EUR 1000)
Investeeringud (tuhandetes eurodes)
As to ability to raise capital, all of the cooperating Community producers are part of larger groups and are financed via intra group cash pooling systems.
Kapitali kaasamise võime puhul märgitakse, et kõik komisjoniga koostööd tegevad ühenduse tootjad kuuluvad suurematesse kontsernidesse ning nende rahastamine toimub kontsernisiseste rahakoondamissüsteemide kaudu.
Therefore, whilst none of the companies reported any difficulties in raising capital for their activities during the period considered, this indicator is not considered to be a good reflection of the situation of the Community industry.
Seega leitakse, et kuigi ükski ettevõte ei teatanud kapitali kaasamise raskustest vaatlusalusel perioodil, ei ole see näitaja hea ühenduse tootmisharu olukorra iseloomustaja.
Over the period under consideration, the profitability of the Community producers dropped significantly from 9,3 % in 2001 to 0,1 % in the IP.
Vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul langes ühenduse tootjate kulutasuvus 9,3 protsendilt 2001. aastal 0,1 protsendile uurimisperioodil.
The return on investment followed a similar downward trend as that seen for profitability.
Investeeringutasuvus arenes sarnaselt kulutasuvusega langussuunas.
This dramatic trend in profitability and return on investment would certainly be worse should the Community industry have maintained its prices, in which case it would have suffered loss of market share and sales volume, and the consequent declining economies of scale.
See kulutasuvuse ja investeeringutasuvuse areng oleks kindlasti halvem, kui ühenduse tootmisharu oleks oma hinnad säilitanud ja selletõttu kaotanud turuosas ja müügimahus ning seega mastaabisäästus.
3,2 %– ould certainly be worse should the Community industry have maintained its prices, in which case it would have suffered loss of market share and sales volume, and the consequent declining economies of scale.
3,2 %– halvem, kui ühenduse tootmisharu oleks oma hinnad säilitanud ja selletõttu kaotanud turuosas ja müügimahus ning seega mastaabisäästus.
2,9 %– ould certainly be worse should the Community industry have maintained its prices, in which case it would have suffered loss of market share and sales volume, and the consequent declining economies of scale.
2,9 %– halvem, kui ühenduse tootmisharu oleks oma hinnad säilitanud ja selletõttu kaotanud turuosas ja müügimahus ning seega mastaabisäästus.
The cash flow generated by the like product diminished considerably from EUR 10 million in 2001 to EUR 4,2 million during the IP, i.e. by 58 %.
Samasuguse toote tekitatud rahavoog vähenes 10 miljonilt eurolt 2001. aastal 4,2 miljonile eurole uurimisperioodil ehk 58 %.
Cash flow (in EUR 1000)
Rahavoog (tuhandetes eurodes)
Employment decreased by 10 % between 2001 and the IP.
Tööhõive vähenes 2001. aasta ja uurimisperioodi vahel 10 %.
Productivity increased between 2001 and the IP, by 17 %, due to the important measures put into place to improve cost efficiency, such as the reduction of personnel and removal of bottlenecks in production.
Tootlikkus kasvas 2001. aasta ja uurimisperioodi vahel 17 % seoses tulemuslikkuse parandamiseks võetud tähtsate meetmetega, nagu näiteks töötajate arvu vähendamine ja tootmise kitsaskohtade eemaldamine.
Production per employee (tonnes/employee)
Toodang töötaja kohta (tonnides/töötaja)
Labour costs increased by 6 % over the period under consideration, from EUR 6,2 million in 2001 to EUR 6,5 million during the IP.
Tööjõukulud kasvasid vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul 6 % võrra 6,2 miljonilt eurolt 2001. aastal 6,5 miljonile eurole uurimisperioodil.
This development is merely in line with the cost of living increase.
See areng on kooskõlas elukalliduse tõusuga.
Due to the reduction in the number of people employed, average labour costs per employee actually increased by 17 %, from EUR 50239 to EUR 58842.
Töötajate arvu vähendamise tõttu kasvasid keskmised tööjõukulud tegelikult 17 % võrra 50239 eurolt 58842 eurole.
Labour costs per employee (EUR)
Tööjõukulud töötaja kohta (eurodes)
Given the volume and the price of the dumped imports, the impact of the actual margins of dumping, which are also significant, cannot be considered negligible.
Dumpinguhinnaga impordi mahtu ja hinda silmas pidades ei saa tähtsusetuks pidada kõnealuste marginaalide mõju, mis on märkimisväärselt suur.
The Community industry was not in a situation where it had to recover from the past effects of injurious dumping.
Ühenduse tootmisharu ei pidanud toibuma varasema kahjustava dumpingu mõjudest.
Although the volume of dumped imports of the product concerned originating in Russia and the PRC decreased from 6281 tonnes to 5079 tonnes between 2001 and the IP, it remained constantly high during the whole period considered.
Kuigi vaatlusaluse toote dumpinguhinnaga import Venemaalt ja Hiinast vähenes 2001. aastast uurimisperioodini 6281 tonnilt 5079 tonnile, püsis ta kogu vaatlusalusel perioodil pidevalt kõrgel.
The corresponding market share decreased from 38,8 % in 2001 to 34,5 % during the IP but remained also at a very high level.
Vastav turuosa vähenes 38,8 protsendilt 2001. aastal 34,5 protsendile uurimisperioodil, kuid püsis samuti väga kõrgel tasemel.
The average prices of the dumped imports decreased dramatically over the period under consideration, i.e. by 43 % and were consistently lower than those of the Community industry, resulting in substantial price undercutting by 17,4 % for Russia and 24,5 % for China during the IP.
Dumpinguhinnaga impordi keskmised hinnad vähenesid vaatlusalusel perioodil drastiliselt, st 43 %, ja olid ühenduse tootmisharu hindadest pidevalt madalamad, mille tulemusel lõi Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit import hinnad alla vastavalt 17,4 % ja 24,5 % ulatuses.
An examination of the situation of the Community industry as outlined above shows that between 2001 and the IP, the situation of the Community industry overall deteriorated.
Eespool kirjeldatud ühenduse tootmisharu olukorra analüüs näitab, et ühenduse tootmisharu üldine olukord halvenes 2001. aastast uurimisperioodini.
While it is true that market share and sales volume developed positively, this does not detract from the overall negative picture.
Kuigi on tõsi, et tootmisharu turuosa ja müügimaht arenes positiivselt, ei muuda see üldist negatiivset pilti.
Thus, major injury indicators, such as sales value, profitability, investments, return on investments, ability to raise capital, cash flow and employment, showed negative developments during the period under consideration.
Seega liikusid peamised kahjunäitajad nagu müügiväärtus, kasumlikkus, investeeringud, investeeringutasuvus, kapitali kaasamise võime, rahavood ja tööhõive vaatlusalusel perioodil negatiivses suunas.
As explained in recitals 101, 102 and 103 above, the Community industry’s increase in production and sales volume as well as market share has to be seen in the context of the significant price decline in the Community and the Community industry’s consequent decision to lower its sales prices to thus maintain or increase its sales volume and to reach the critical mass of production volume needed to cover fixed costs.
Nagu põhjendustes 101, 102 ja 103 selgitatud, tuleb ühenduse tootmisharu tootmise, müügimahu ja turuosa kasvu vaatlemisel arvesse võtta hindade märkimisväärset langust ühenduses ning ühenduse tootmisharu otsust alandada müügimahu säilitamiseks ja püsikulude katmiseks vajaliku tootmise kriitilise massi saavutamiseks oma müügihindu.
This had a dramatic impact on the Community industry’s profitability which declined substantially from 9,3 % in 2001 to 0,1 % in the IP and with substantial losses in 2003 (– 3,2 %).
See mõjutas drastiliselt ühenduse tootmisharu kulutasuvust, mis vähenes 9,3 protsendilt 2001. aastal 0,1 protsendile uurimisperioodil ning lisandus suur kahjum 2003. aastal (-3,2 %).
It should furthermore be noted that consumption only decreased between 2001 and 2002, but remained stable between 2002 and the IP, or even increased slightly.
Lisaks tuleks märkida, et tarbimine vähenes vaid 2001. ja 2002. aasta vahel, kuid 2002. aasta ja uurimisperioodid vahelisel ajal oli see stabiilne või isegi suurenes pisut.
It is therefore concluded that the Community industry could at least take partly advantage of this slight increase in consumption by increasing their sales volume.
Seega järeldatakse, et ühenduse tootmisharu sai tarbimise mõningasest kasvust vähemalt osaliselt kasu tänu müügimahu suurendamisele.
Finally as explained in recital 105, the slight decrease in stock volumes was found not to be a significant factor since this was in line with the Community industry’s policy to maintain stock levels at a minimum.
Viimaks, nagu on selgitatud põhjenduses 105 ei peetud varude mõningast vähenemist märkimisväärseks teguriks, sest see oli kooskõlas ühenduse tootmisharu põhimõttega hoida varud minimaalsel tasemel.
This decline in profitability coincided with a sharp decrease in prices.
See kulutasuvuse vähenemine langes kokku järsu hinnalangusega.
The industry compensated to some extent for the fall in prices through increased production and sales, leading to an increase in market share.
Tootmisharu kompenseeris hinnalangust osaliselt suurema tootmise ja müügiga, mille tulemuseks oli tema turuosa suurenemine.
These positive effects have not prevented the Community industry from seeing a sharp decrease in its profitability.
See positiivne mõju ei hoidnud ühenduse tootmisharu jaoks ära kulutasuvuse järsku vähenemist.
It was therefore concluded that the positive trends of injury indicators such as sales volume and market share did not outweigh the overall deteriorated situation of the Community industry because it did not change the fact that the financial situation of the Community industry was indeed critical.
Seepärast leiti, et kahjunäitajate, näiteks müügimahu ja turuosa positiivne areng ei ole piisavad tasakaalustamaks ühenduse tootmisharu üldiselt halvenenud olukorda, sest sellest hoolimata on ühenduse tootmisharu rahaline olukord väga raske.
The increase in sales volume and market share was therefore not considered as decisive for the assessment of the Community industry’s situation during the period considered.
Seepärast ei peetud müügimahu ja turuosa suurenemist otsustavaks ühenduse tootmisharu olukorra hindamisel vaatlusalusel perioodil.
In the light of the foregoing, it is provisionally concluded that the Community industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Eelöeldut silmas pidades on jõutud esialgsele järeldusele, et ühenduse tootmisharu kannatas olulist kahju algmääruse artikli 3 lõike 5 tähenduses.
In accordance with Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the dumped imports originating in Russia and the PRC have caused injury to the Community industry to a degree that may be considered as material.
Algmääruse artikli 3 lõigete 6 ja 7 kohaselt kontrolliti, kas Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit dumpinguhinnaga import on põhjustanud ühenduse tootmisharule kahju ulatuses, mida võiks liigitada oluliseks.
It has to be noted that although imports from Russia and China decreased overall between 2001 and the IP, they showed an increasing trend since 2002.
Tuleb märkida, et kuigi Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit import vähenes üldiselt 2001. aasta ja uurimisperioodi vahel, hakkas see alates 2002. aastast kasvama.
Thus, imports fell from 2001 to 2002 from 6281 tonnes to 4838 tonnes.
Seega vähenes import 2001. aastast 2002. aastani 6281 tonnilt 4838 tonnile.
Between 2002 and the IP, however, the volume of imports of the product concerned from Russia and the PRC into the Community increased from 4838 tonnes to 5079 tonnes.
aasta ja uurimisperioodi vahel aga kasvas vaatlusaluse toote import Venemaalt ja Hiinast ühendusse 4838 tonnilt 5079 tonnile.
The corresponding share of the Community market went from 33,8 % in 2002 to reach 34,5 % during the IP.
Kõnealuse impordi turuosa ühenduse turul kasvas 33,8 protsendilt 2002. aastal 34,5 protsendile uurimisperioodil.
More importantly, the overall decrease of imported volumes (which still remained at very high levels and held a higher market share than that of the Community industry) was accompanied by a substantial decrease of import prices.
Veelgi olulisem on, et impordimahu üldise vähenemisega (kusjuures see püsis sellegipoolest väga kõrgel tasemel ja hõlmas ühenduse tootmisharust suuremat turuosa) kaasnes impordihindade oluline vähenemine.
The latter basically collapsed.
Need varisesid sisuliselt kokku.
This coincided with the deterioration of the situation of the Community industry during the same period.
See sattus ühele ajale ühenduse tootmisharu olukorra halvenemisega samal perioodil.
This deterioration is seen, in particular, in terms of sales prices, profitability, return on investment, cash flow and employment.
Seda halvenemist näitavad eelkõige müügihinnad, kulutasuvus, investeeringutasuvus, rahavoog ja tööhõive.
As mentioned above, the imports originating in Russia and the PRC undercut the average sales price of the Community industry by significant amounts, with undercutting margins of 17,4 % and 24,5 %.
Nagu eespool mainitud, lõi Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit import ühenduse tootmisharu keskmised müügihinnad oma marginaalidega vastavalt 17,4 % ja 24,5 % suures ulatuses alla.
In the analysis of the effect of the dumped imports, it was found that price is an important element of competition.
Dumpinguhinnaga impordi mõju analüüsimisel tuvastati, et hind on oluline konkurentsielement.
Moreover, even taking into account the differences in quality, the prices of dumped imports were considerably below both those of the Community industry as well as those of other third country exporters.
Pealegi olid dumpinguhinnaga impordi hinnad ka kvaliteedierinevusi arvesse võttes ühenduse tootmisharu ja ülejäänud kolmandate riikide eksportijate hindadest palju madalamad.
It was verified with one of the Community producers, that for so called ‘modified’ grades which are not produced by Russian nor Chinese exporters, the injury situation was inexistent as demonstrated by a positive evolution of the profitability.
Ühe ühenduse tootjaga tõestati, et nn “modifitseeritud” sortide puhul, mida Vene ja Hiina eksportijad ei tooda, kahjuolukorda ei olnud, mida tõendas kulutasuvuse positiivne areng.
However, in those instances of the market where this same producer was exposed to competition from the dumped imports from Russia and the PRC, its financial situation was significantly negative.
Kui aga sama tootja konkureeris turul Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit dumpinguhinnaga impordiga, oli tema finantsseisund suures osas negatiivne.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that the pressure exerted by the imports concerned, which increased their volume and market share from 2002 onwards, and which were made at very low and dumped prices, played a determining role in the deterioration of the Community industry’s financial situation.
Seepärast tehakse esialgu järeldus, et surve, mida tekitas asjaomane import, mille maht ja turuosa alates 2002. aastast kasvas ja mis toimus väga madalate dumpinguhindadega, mängis ühenduse tootmisharu finantsseisundi halvenemises määravat rolli.
The Community consumption, although having decreased by 12 % between 2001 and 2002, remained stable afterwards up to the IP at the level of 2002 and increased even slightly.
Kuigi ühenduse tarbimine oli 2001. ja 2002. aasta vahel 12 % vähenenud, püsis ta pärast seda kuni uurimisperioodini stabiilselt 2002. aasta tasemel ning isegi suurenes pisut.
This drop in consumption is, however, not in line with the decrease of the total Community market value, which fell by 39 % during the same period, i.e. substantially more than consumption.
See vähenemine ei ole aga kooskõlas samal ajavahemikul toimunud kogu ühenduse turuväärtuse langusega 39 % võrra, mis on märkimisväärselt rohkem kui tarbimise puhul.
This significant decline of the market value is due to a substantial drop in prices of the imports under consideration which the Community industry was obliged to follow in order to keep its market share and capacity utilisation.
See turuväärtuse oluline langus on tingitud vaadeldava impordi hindade olulisest langusest, mida ühenduse tootmisharu oli sunnitud järgima, et säilitada oma turuosa ja tootmisvõimsuse rakendusastet.
It is noted that the overall decrease of the Community consumption did not prevent the Community industry to increase its sales volume (by 15 % over the period considered), while the increase in sales volume was accompanied by a dramatic decrease in sales value which caused significant financial losses to the Community industry.
Tuleb märkida, et hoolimata ühenduse tarbimise üldisest vähenemisest suurenes siiski ühenduse tootmisharu müügimaht (vaatlusalusel perioodil 15 %), kuid müügimahu kasv tõi kaasa müügiväärtuse drastilise languse, mis tekitas ühenduse tootmisharule märkimisväärset rahalist kahju.
This shows that the material injury suffered by the Community industry is rather a consequence of the decline in sales value than the fall in consumption.
See näitab, et ühenduse tootmisharule tekitatud oluline kahju tuleneb pigem müügiväärtuse langusest kui tarbimise vähenemisest.
As mentioned in recital 87, the reason for the decline in the Community consumption was the general economic downturn worldwide.
Nagu öeldud põhjenduses 87, tulenes ühenduse tarbimise vähenemine peamiselt üldisest majanduslikust surutisest.
In this regard, it should be noted that the PTFE market is cyclical and depends strongly on global economic developments.
Siinkohal tuleks märkida, et PTFE turg on tsükliline ja sõltub suurel määral üldistest majandussuundumustest.
This linkage also explains the decrease in consumption despite the decline in sales prices.
Nimetatud seos selgitab ka, miks tarbimine vähenes olenemata madalamatest müügihindadest.
It should also be noted that import prices decreased to a significantly higher degree than Community consumption during the same period.
Lisaks tuleb mainida, et impordihinnad langesid oluliselt rohkem kui ühenduse tarbimine samal ajavahemikul.
Thus, consumption fell by 9 %, while import prices declined by 43 % during the period under consideration.
Vaatlusalusel perioodil vähenes tarbimine 9 % võrra, impordihinnad aga 43 % võrra.
Import prices undercut substantially the Community industry prices throughout the whole period under consideration and were moreover significantly dumped during the IP.
Impordihinnad olid ühenduse tootmisharu hindadest oluliselt madalamad kogu vaatlusaluse perioodi jooksul ning lisaks toimus import uurimisperioodi jooksul märkimisväärselt madalate dumpinguhindadega.
Given this sharp and constant price decline, whereas consumption although decreasing between 2001 and 2002 remained relatively stable subsequently, it was concluded that the material injury suffered is not caused by a decrease in consumption but rather by the dumped imports from the countries concerned which as a consequence forced the Community industry to lower its sales prices.
Arvestades kirjeldatud järsku ja pidevat hinnalangust ning asjaolu, et 2001. ja 2002. aasta vahelisel ajal vähenenud tarbimine püsis seejärel suhteliselt stabiilsena, leiti, et olulist kahju ei tekitanud mitte tarbimise vähenemine vaid pigem dumpinguhinnaga import asjaomastest riikidest, mille tagajärjel oli ühenduse tootmisharu sunnitud langetama oma müügihindu.
Imports originating in third countries other than Russia and the PRC
Muudest kolmandatest riikidest kui Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit import
It should be recalled that the product concerned forms only a part of CN code 39046100.
Tuleb meenutada, et vaatlusalune toode moodustab CN-koodist 39046100 ainult osa.
However, since no information indicates that imports under this CN heading are other than granular PTFE, Eurostat import figures for the full CN heading are considered to relate only to the product concerned.
Kuna aga puudub teave selle kohta, et selle rubriigi alla kuuluv import hõlmaks muid tooteid kui granuleeritud PTFEd, loetakse, et Eurostati impordinäitajad kogu rubriigi kohta on seotud ainult vaatlusaluse tootega.
Imports originating in third countries other than Russia and the PRC decreased slightly, from 4270 tonnes in 2001 to 3699 tonnes during the IP.
Muudest kolmandatest riikidest kui Venemaalt ja Hiinast pärit import vähenes vähe – 4270 tonnilt 2001. aastal 3699 tonnile uurimisperioodil.
Consequently, their market share decreased overall from 26,4 % in 2001 to 25,1 % in the IP.
Sellega seoses vähenes selle impordi turuosa 26,4 protsendilt 2001. aastal 25,1 protsendile uurimisperioodil.
The main individual countries exporting the product concerned to the Community are Japan and the USA.
Peamised vaatlusalust toodet ühendusse eksportivad riigid on Jaapan ja Ameerika Ühendriigid (USA).