natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glyphosate originating in the PRC is still offered at cif values below the current sales prices of the Community producers.
Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinevat glüfosaati pakutakse endiselt CIF-väärtusega alla ühenduse tootjate jooksvate müügihindade.
Therefore, the expiry of measures would lead either to glyphosate originating in the PRC gaining market share on the Community market to the detriment of the Community producers, or alternatively the Community industry would have to lower their already declining sales prices even further in order to maintain market share and capacity utilisation.
Seetõttu viiks meetmete aegumine kas turuosa hõivamiseni Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva glüfosaadi poolt ühenduse tootjate kahjuks või peaks ühenduse tootmisharu alandama oma niigi vähenenud müügihinda, et säilitada turuosa ja võimsuse kasutamine.
In both scenarios the Community industry would suffer losses due to an expiry of measures.
Mõlema stsenaariumi korral kannaks ühenduse tootmisharu meetmete aegumise tõttu kahjusid.
The Community producers claimed that the measures had been either absorbed by the PRC or circumvented for most of the analysis period, thereby resulting in them having a limited remedial effect.
Ühenduse tootjad väitsid, et Hiina Rahvavabariik absorbeeris meetmed või hoidus neist enamiku analüüsiperioodi jooksul kõrvale, nii et meetmetel oli ainult piiratud parandav mõju.
The absorption and circumvention via Malaysia and Taiwan have been confirmed and addressed by the review investigations mentioned in recital 1.
Absorbtsiooni ja kõrvalehoidmist Malaisia ja Taiwani kaudu kinnitas ja viitas neile ka eespool põhjenduses 1 mainitud uurimine.
Several suppliers of raw materials and services came forward and stated that they expect a reduced Community production if measures were to expire, and therefore a reduced demand for their raw materials and services.
Mitmed tooraine tarnijad ja teenusepakkujad väitsid, et nad ootavad meetmete aegumisel ühenduse tootmise vähenemist ning seega ka väiksemat nõudlust nende tooraine ja teenuste järele.
In view of the above, it is considered that, in the absence of anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned from the PRC, the situation of the Community industry would worsen through increased imports at dumped prices from the PRC leading to increased financial losses.
Arvestades eespool toodut leitakse, et dumpinguvastaste meetmete puudumisel kõnealuse Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva toote suhtes halveneks ühenduse tootmisharu olukord dumpinguhindadega impordi kasvamise tõttu Hiina Rahvavabariigist, mis viiks suurema varalise kahjuni.
While imports from the PRC have dropped during the period analysed, it must be stressed that glyphosate can be considered as a commodity.
Kuigi Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinev import on analüüsitud perioodi jooksul vähenenud, tuleb rõhutada, et glüfosaati võib vaadelda laiatarbekaubana.
In these circumstances, even a low level of imports at dumped prices can have a detrimental impact on the Community industry.
Sellises olukorras võib isegi väikesel kogusel dumpinguhinnaga impordil olla ühenduse tootmisharule kahjulik mõju.
The Community industry has increased production, sales volumes and market share over the period analysed but at the expense of profits.
Ühenduse tootmisharu on analüüsiperioodil suurendanud tootmist, müügimahtu ja turuosa, kuid teinud seda oma kasumi arvelt.
The essential viability of the industry would be threatened in the absence of measures to eliminate the injurious dumping.
Kahjuliku dumpingu kõrvaldamiseks ettenähtud meetmete puudumisel satuks ohtu tootmisharu elujõulisus.
Interest of unrelated importers/formulators
Sõltumatute importijate/retseptisegu tegijate huvid
Since the major part of glyphosate imports originating in the PRC into the Community is in the form of acid or salt and is resold in a formulated form, the formulating industry is therefore concerned by this proceeding.
Et suurem osa Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinevast ühendusse imporditud glüfosaadist esineb happe või soolana ning seda müüakse edasi retseptiseguna, puudutab see menetlus ka retseptisegu tegevat tootmisharu.
Certain of these importers indicated that, while currently only importing minimal quantities of glyphosate from the PRC, they would recommence imports from the PRC in the absence of measures.
Teatav osa neist importijatest teatas, et kuigi nad impordivad Hiina Rahvavabariigist praegu minimaalsetes kogustes glüfosaati, alustaksid nad meetmete puudumisel uuesti importi Hiina Rahvavabariigist.
One importer/formulator fully cooperated with the Commission.
Üks importija/retseptisegu tegija tegi komisjoniga täielikku koostööd.
It presented a submission in which it stated its position against measures because any increase in the price of the main input would reduce its profit margin on formulated glyphosate.
Ta esitas ettepaneku, milles väljendas oma meetmetevastast seisukohta, sest igasugune põhisisendi hinnatõus alandaks retseptisegu kasumimarginaali.
A number of formulators who are currently not importing glyphosate acid originating in the PRC as a result of the existing measures stated that they would recommence sourcing the product from the PRC should measures expire.
Mitu retseptisegu tegijat, kes praegu ei impordi kehtivate meetmete tõttu Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinevat glüfosaathapet, teatas, et nad alustaksid meetmete aegumisel taas toote hankimist Hiina Rahvavabariigist.
As it was found that most of the importers/formulators deal with a range of products other than glyphosate, it is considered that, even if measures would have the effect of limiting a decrease in glyphosate acid prices, the impact of the measures on the overall business of these companies would be limited.
Kuna leiti, et enamik importijatest/retseptisegu tegijatest kaupleb peale glüfosaadi ka muude toodetega, otsustati, et isegi kui meetmed piiraksid glüfosaathappe hinnalangust, oleks meetmete üldine mõju nende äriühingute kogu äritegevusele piiratud.
Importers/formulators expect that lifting the measures would lead to lower prices for their glyphosate on the Community market, allowing them to expand their market share at the expense of the Community producers.
Importijad/retseptisegu tegijad eeldavad, et meetmete kõrvaldamine viiks nende glüfosaadi madalamate hindadeni ühenduse turul, mis võimaldaks neil laiendada oma turuosa ühenduse tootjate arvelt.
However, the financial benefit from this would be limited, since the importers/formulators would be forced to pass on the bulk of their decrease in cost to their customers due to competition from other formulators also importing glyphosate originating in the PRC.
Selle rahaline kasu oleks siiski piiratud, sest importijad/retseptisegu tegijad oleksid teiste samuti Hiina Rahvavabariigist glüfosaati importivate retseptisegu tegijate konkurentsi tõttu sunnitud kandma suurema osa oma kulude vähenemisest üle oma klientidele.
Moreover, the importers/formulators should not obtain advantage through dumping since this creates an imbalance vis-à-vis the other competitors, namely the Community industry.
Lisaks ei peaks importijad/retseptisegu tegijad saama eelist dumpingu abil, sest see loob tasakaalustamatuse teiste konkurentide, st ühenduse tootmisharu suhtes.
For the abovementioned reasons, it is considered that the benefits afforded to the Community industry resulting from maintaining the measures would outweigh any marginal negative impact that may result for the importers/formulators concerned.
Eespool toodud põhjustel leitakse, et ühenduse tootmisharule meetmete säilitamisega antavad eelised kaaluksid üles igasuguse marginaali negatiivse mõju, mis võib tekkida asjassepuutuvate importijate/retseptisegu tegijate suhtes.
Interests of distributors and consumers
Turustajate ja tarbijate huvid
The Commission received a submission by an association representing distributors and users of agrochemicals in the EU.
Komisjon sai taotluse turustajaid ja agrokemikaalide kasutajaid esindavalt ühenduselt ELs.
This association put forward a number of allegations concerning the behaviour of the Community producers on the Community market to the detriment of independent distributors of agrochemicals.
See ühendus esitas mitu väidet, mis puudutasid ühenduse tootjate käitumist ühenduse turul agrokemikaalide sõltumatute turustajate kahjustamiseks.
This association and an importer/formulator claimed that the Community market is heavily protected against imports through regulatory barriers, namely Council Directive 91/414/EC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [8], therefore making it unnecessary for measures to remain in place.
See ühendus ja üks importija/retseptisegu tegija väitis, et ühenduse turg on impordi eest õiguslike tõketega tugevalt kaitstud, nimelt nõukogu 15. juuli 1991. aasta direktiiviga 91/414/EMÜ taimekaitsevahendite turuleviimise kohta, [8] muutes meetmete säilitamise ebavajalikuks.
This claim was repeated by the association following disclosure of the findings.
Ühendus kordas seda väidet pärast tulemuste avalikustamist.
It has to be noted that this Directive does not relate to trade defence, but rather to environmental safety issues.
Tuleb märkida, et see direktiiv ei puuduta kaubanduskaitset, vaid pigem keskkonnakaitset.
It was nevertheless argued that obtaining the necessary information for registration of glyphosate is both costly and time consuming and acts as a deterrent for importers/formulators to import glyphosate from third countries.
Sellegipoolest väideti, et glüfosaadi registreerimiseks vajaliku teabe hankimine on kulukas ja aeganõudev ning toimib importijatele/retseptisegu tegijatele glüfosaadi importimisel kolmandatest riikidest takistusena.
However, in practice this does not appear to be a severe limitation since a number of importers/formulators have succeeded in obtaining registration under Directive 91/414/EC.
Praktikas ei tundu see siiski olevat tõsiseltvõetav takistus, sest paljudel importijatel/retseptisegu tegijatel on õnnestunud registreerida toode vastavalt direktiivile 91/414/EMÜ.
Furthermore, the cooperating importer/formulator stated that they would import glyphosate originating in the PRC should measures be lifted.
Lisaks teatas koostööd tegev importija/retseptisegu tegija, et meetmete kõrvaldamisel impordiks ta Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinevat glüfosaati.
Therefore, it is considered that Directive 91/414/EC does not close the Community market to imports of glyphosate from the PRC.
Seetõttu leitakse, et direktiiv 91/414/EMÜ ei sulge ühenduse turgu Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva glüfosaadi impordile.
The association further claimed that low prices of ‘generic’ standard formulated products produced by formulators based on acid or salt manufactured by a certain Community producer are compensated by high prices of ‘branded’ equivalent products sold by the same producer.
Ühendus väitis ka seda, et retseptisegu tegijate poolt teatava ühenduse tootja happest või soolast toodetud geneeriliste standardsete retseptisegude madalat hinda kompenseerib sama tootja müüdavate ekvivalentsete margitoodete kõrge hind.
It was claimed that these low priced ‘generic’ products would act as a deterrent toward the entry of other manufactures, including imports of glyphosate originating in the PRC, to the Community market.
Väideti, et need madala hinnaga geneerilised tooted toimiksid takistusena teistele ühenduse turule sisenda soovivatele tootjatele, kaasa arvatud Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva glüfosaadi impordile.
While it was confirmed that formulators purchase acid and/or salt from this Community producer at low prices, it could not be said that the Community producer was in a position to achieve high prices on its formulated products.
Kuigi kinnitati, et retseptisegu tegijad ostavad hapet ja/või soola sellelt ühenduse tootjalt madalate hindadega, ei saa öelda, et ühenduse tootja oleks saanud oma retseptisegu eest kõrget hinda.
As stated in recital 75, Community producers, including the producer concerned, were selling their standard formulated products (which are branded products) at a loss during the analysis period, which makes the claim that they would be in a position to obtain high prices on their ‘brand’ products implausible.
Nagu põhjenduses 75 väidetakse, müüsid ühenduse tootjad, kaasa arvatud asjassepuutuv tootja, oma standardseid retseptisegusid (mis on margitooted) analüüsiperioodil kahjumiga, mis muudab ebatõenäoliseks väite, mille kohaselt saaksid nad oma margitoodete eest kõrgemat hinda.
This association also claimed that two Community producers operate a cartel in the Community because one of them appears to limit its market share in the Community while they could supply a much larger share of the Community market.
See ühendus väitis ka, et kaks ühenduse tootjat on sõlminud ühenduses kartellikokkuleppe, sest üks neist tundub olevat piiranud oma turuosa ühenduses, kuigi võiks varustada palju suuremat osa ühenduse turust.
In this regard, it should be noted that evidence presented in support of the claim was not conclusive, since factors other than the existence of a cartel could explain the alleged limitation of the market share by the Community producer.
Sellega seoses tuleks märkida, et väite toetuseks esitatud tõendusmaterjal ei olnud veenev, sest ka muud asjaolud peale kartellikokkuleppe võivad selgitada väidetavat turuosa piiramist ühenduse tootja poolt.
First of all, it has to be pointed out that the market share of not only the producer in question but also of other producers did not vary substantially over the analysis period.
Esiteks tuleb rõhutada, et mitte ainult kõnealuse tootja turuosa, vaid ka teiste tootjate turuosa ei muutunud analüüsiperioodi jooksul oluliselt.
Secondly, sales on export markets could be made at higher prices, and hence the fact that the company did not sell more in the Community as opposed to outside of it could possibly be explained by other factors such as, for example, the company's own efforts to maximise returns on export markets which were more profitable than the Community market.
Teiseks võidakse eksporditurul müüa kõrgema hinnaga ning seega asjaolu, et ettevõte ei müünud ühenduses rohkem kui sellest väljaspool, saab selgitada ka muude mõjuritega, nagu äriühingu enda pingutused, et maksimeerida tulu eksporditurgudelt, mis on kasumlikumad kui ühenduse turg.
Furthermore, the production of the Community industry is significantly larger than consumption in the Community and, therefore, it is important economically for all Community manufacturers to export glyphosate to third countries in order to achieve high capacity utilisation in order to fully absorb their fixed costs.
Lisaks on ühenduse tootmisharu toodang märkimisväärselt suurem kui ühenduse tarbimine ning seetõttu on kõigi ühenduse tootjate jaoks majanduslikult oluline eksportida glüfosaati kolmandatesse riikidesse, et saavutada oma püsikulude täielikuks absorbeerimiseks suur võimsuse kasutamine.
In this context, there is at present insufficient evidence to conclude that a cartel exists, involving the deliberate limitation of quantities supplied to the Community market to the detriment of consumers.
Selles kontekstis on praegu ebapiisavalt tõendeid, et teha järeldusi kartelli olemasolu kohta, mille raames piiratakse tahtlikult ühenduse turule tarnitavaid koguseid, kahjustades nii tarbijaid.
Finally, the question of the existence or not of any cartel is a matter which should rather be addressed in the context of an anti-trust investigation.
Lõpuks tuleks küsimus igasuguse kartelli olemasolust suunata pigem trustidevastasesse uurimisse.
However, no anti-trust procedure has been initiated, to date, by the Commission on this matter.
Komisjon ei ole praeguseks algatanud ühtegi trustidevastast menetlust.
On the other hand, there was no indication concerning possible negative effects of the continuation of the anti-dumping measures as regards the glyphosate distributors.
Teisest küljest ei olnud märke dumpinguvastaste meetmete jätkumise võimalike kahjulike mõjude kohta glüfosaadi turustajate suhtes.
As regards the consumers of the product, these are essentially farmers.
Toote tarbijad on põhiliselt talupidajad.
A reduction in the price of glyphosate would have a minimal effect on their profitability since this is only a relatively minor item in the overall cost of crop growing.
Glüfosaadi hinna langemine mõjutaks nende kulutasuvust minimaalselt, sest glüfosaat moodustab põllukultuuride kasvatamise kogukuludest suhteliselt väikese osa.
It was established that the expiry of the measures would lead to an improvement in the profit margin of farmers which would be of the order of 0,1 %.
Tehti kindlaks, et meetmete aegumine viiks talupidajate kasumimarginaali paranemiseni suurusjärgus 0,1 %.
For the abovementioned reasons, it is considered that any benefits afforded to the Community industry resulting from maintaining the measures would outweigh any marginal negative impact that may result for the distributors and consumers concerned.
Eespool toodud põhjustel leitakse, et kõik meetmete säilitamisest tulenevad eelised ühenduse turule kaaluvad üles kõik marginaalsed negatiivsed mõjud, mis võivad tekkida asjakohastel turustajatel ja tarbijatel.
Conclusion on Community interest
Järeldus ühenduse huvide kohta
Should the existing measures expire, it is expected that the Community industry would suffer significant losses due to price depression on the Community market, which would either lead to a loss of market share against increased imports originating in the PRC or a further deterioration of their sales prices should they attempt to maintain their market share.
Juhul kui olemasolevad meetmed aeguvad, tekib ühenduse tootmisharule hinnalanguse tõttu ühenduse turu eeldatavasti märkimisväärne kahju, mis viib kas turuosa kaotamiseni Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärinevale suurenenud impordile või, kui ühenduse tootmisharu üritab oma turuosa säilitada, selle müügihinna edasise halvenemise.
Importers/formulators could benefit from an increasing market share due to cheaper supply of glyphosate originating in the PRC, but, compared to the losses incurred by the Community industry, the economic effect of this for importers/formulators would be minor in view of the need to pass on price reductions to their clients.
Importijad/retseptisegu tegijad saaksid suurenenud turuosast tänu Hiina Rahvavabariigist pärineva glüfosaadi odavale tarnimisele kasu, kuid võrreldes ühenduse tootmisharule tekitatava kahjuga oleks selle majanduslik mõju importijatele/retseptisegu tegijatele väike selle tõttu, et neil tuleb langetada hindu ka oma klientidel.
There was no indication concerning possible negative effects of the continuation of the anti-dumping measures as regards the glyphosate distributors.
Dumpinguvastaste meetmete jätkumisel ei leitud glüfosaadi turustajate suhtes ühtegi negatiivset mõju olevat.
For users, although these might benefit somewhat from lower prices if measures were removed, this would not have a significant effect on their profit margin or, consequently, on their activity.
Kuigi kasutajad saaksid madalamatest hindadest teatavat kasu, ei ole sellel märkimisväärset mõju nende kasumimarginaalile või nende tegevusele.
After weighing the interests of the various parties involved, the Commission concludes that there are no compelling reasons of Community interest against the continuation of measures.
Pärast erinevate osapoolte huvide kaalumist leidis komisjon, et meetmete jätkumise vastu ei ole ühtegi komisjoni huvidega seotud sundivat põhjust.
PROPOSED DUTIES
KAVANDATAVAD TOLLIMAKSUD
The product type used as a reference to determine the duty rate was glyphosate acid because it is the common base of all forms of glyphosate exported from the PRC and produced in the Community.
Maksumäära kindlaksmääramisel võrdlustootena kasutatud tootetüüp oli glüfosaathape, sest see on tavaliselt kõigi Hiina Rahvavabariigist eksporditavate ja ühenduses toodetavate glüfosaadivormide aluseks.
It was found that acid accounts for 55 % of the manufacturing costs of the equivalent quantity of standard 360 formulated product.
Leiti, et hape moodustab standardse 360se retseptisegu ekvivalentkoguse tootmiskuludest 55 %.
Moreover, the acid form represented more than 90 % of the volume imported from the PRC during the investigation period.
Lisaks moodustas happevorm rohkem kui 90 % Hiina Rahvavabariigist uurimisperioodi ajal imporditud mahust.
It is therefore considered that a duty established on the basis of data concerning glyphosate acid would be representative of all different forms of glyphosate imported from the PRC.
Seetõttu leitakse, et glüfosaaathapet puudutava teabe põhjal kehtestatud tollimaks on representatiivne kõigi Hiina Rahvavabariigist imporditavate glüfosaadivormide suhtes.
For the purposes of calculating the price increase necessary in order to remove the injurious effects of dumping, it was considered appropriate to compare the prices of the dumped imports with the production costs of glyphosate acid of the Community industry increased by an amount sufficient to achieve a reasonable level of profit.
Dumpingu kahjulike mõjude kõrvaldamiseks vajaliku hinnatõusu arvutamisel peeti vajalikuks võrrelda dumpinguhinnaga impordi hindu ühenduse tootmisharu glüfosaathappe tootmiskuludega, mida suurendati nii palju, et saavutada mõistlik kasumitase.
The Commission took the view that a profit margin of 5 % represented a reasonable profit since glyphosate acid is a commodity, theoretically sold in bulk to intermediate customers who bear the extra cost of formulation before selling it in the market to end users, as already considered in the original investigation.
Komisjon võttis seisukoha, mille järgi 5 %line kasumimarginaal on mõistlik kasum, sest glüfosaathape on laiatarbekaup, mida teoreetiliselt müüakse hulgi vaheklientidele, kes kannavad retseptisegu tegemise lisakulud, enne kui glüfosaat turul lõppkasutajale müüakse, nagu tehti kindlaks juba esialgses uurimises.
On this basis, the weighted average of the export prices for this product type for the IP, on a cif Community frontier level, was compared with the weighted average total cost of production of the Community producers, increased to give by a profit margin of 5 %.
Selle alusel võrreldi uurimisperioodil selle tootetüübi CIF-tasandi ekspordihinda ühenduse piiril ühenduse tootjate tootmiskulude kogukulu kaalutud keskmisega, mida suurendati nii, et kasumimarginaal oleks 5 %.
This comparison showed an underselling margin of 80 %.
Selle võrdluse põhjal oli turuhinnast madalama müügi marginaaliks 80 %.
Since the injury margin is higher than the dumping margin found, the anti-dumping duties should be based on the dumping margin in accordance with the provisions of Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation.
Et kahjumarginaal on suurem kui leitud dumpingumarginaal, peaksid dumpinguvastased tollimaksud põhinema dumpingumarginaalil vastavalt algmääruse artikli 7 lõike 2 sätetele.
In view of the findings above, it is considered appropriate that the anti-dumping duties imposed by the original measures should be set at the level mentioned below:
Eespool kirjeldatud tulemuste tõttu peetakse vajalikuks määrata esialgsete meetmetega kehtestatud dumpinguvastased tollimaksud kindlaks järgmisel tasemel:
Rate of AD duty
Dumpinguvastase tollimaksu määr
All exporting producers
Kõik eksportivad tootjad
The anti-dumping duty in force in respect of glyphosate was extended by Regulation (EC) No 163/2002 to cover, in addition, imports of glyphosate consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or Taiwan or not.
Glüfosaadi suhtes kehtivat dumpinguvastast tollimaksu laiendati määrusega (EÜ) nr 163/2002, et hõlmata lisaks ka Malaisiast ja Taiwanist saadetud glüfosaadi import, olenemata sellest, kas seda deklareeritakse Malaisiast või Taiwanist pärinevana või mitte.