natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Several endpoints which reflect these different facets of asthma control are modulated by long-acting β-agonists.
mis peegeldavad astma kontrolli erinevaid tahke, moduleerivad just pikatoimelised β-agonistid.
Assessment of the pre-dose FEV1 data in the three specified studies demonstrated that in two of the three studies formoterol fumarate has no effect upon pre-dose FEV1 whilst in the third study there was some residual formoterol effect upon pre-dose FEV1 but it was insufficient to explain the magnitude of the predose FEV1 treatment effect difference between Flutiform and fluticasone propionate pMDI.
Manustamiseelse FEV1 hindamine kolmes nimetatud uuringus näitas, et kahes uuringus kolmest ei mõjutanud formoteroolfumaraat manustamiseelset FEV1, samas kui kolmandas uuringus oli formoteroolil teatav residuaalne toime manustamiseelsele FEV1-le, kuid see ei olnud piisav, et seletada Flutiformi ja flutikasoonpropionaadi ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatori manustamiseelse FEV1 ravitoime erinevust.
This provides further support for the clinical relevance of the effects seen with Flutiform.
See toetab veelgi Flutiformi täheldatud toime kliinilist olulisust.
The question posed by CHMP implied that the 67% relative bioavailability of the fluticasone propionate component of Flutiform compared with GSK fluticasone propionate pMDI may translate to a lesser inhaled corticosteroid effect and that this lesser effect would be best evaluated in a 6- to 12-month exacerbations study.
Inimravimite komitee esitatud küsimuses anti mõista, et Flutiformi flutikasoonpropionaadi komponendi 67% suhtelist biosaadavust võrreldes GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga võib tõlgendada kui inhaleeritud kortikosteroidi väiksemat toimet, mida on sobivam hinnata 6-12-kuulises ägenemise uuringus.
This hypothesis has in turn led to concerns regarding the duration of the Applicant's 8 to 12 week studies.
See hüpotees tekitas omakorda kahtlusi, kas taotleja uuring ei olnud liiga lühike ( 812-nädalat).
The CHMP was of the opinion that these findings suggest that the PK data from study FLT1501 do not reflect pulmonary deposition accurately and therefore in this study are not a valid surrogate for clinical efficacy of Flutiform.
Neid tulemusi arvesse võttes asus inimravimite komitee seisukohale, et uuringu FLT1501 farmakokineetilised andmed ei peegelda täpselt ravimi ladestumist kopsus ja seega ei ole selle uuringu tulemused Flutiformi kliinilise efektiivsuse sobiv asendusnäitaja.
• In the pharmacokinetic data presented systemic exposure of fluticasone was lower (67%) following Flutiform inhalation than following the concurrent inhalation of fluticasone and formoterol from monoproduct pMDIs.
• farmakokineetilised andmed näitavad, et flutikasooni süsteemne ekspositsioon on pärast Flutiformi inhaleerimist väiksem (67%) võrreldes samaaegse flutikasooni ja formoterooli manustamisega ühte toimeainet sisaldavast dosaatorinhalaatorist.
These findings should be taken together with the results that show that the clinical effects of Flutiform are comparable with the clinical effects of GSK fluticasone propionate and Novartis formoterol fumarate given concomitantly.
Neid tulemusi tuleb analüüsida koos tulemustega, mis näitavad, et Flutiformi kliiniline toime on võrreldav koos manustatud GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi ja Novartise formoteroolfumaraadi kliinilise toimega.
Committee was also of the opinion that the corticosteroid effects seen with Flutiform are no less than those seen with GSK fluticasone propionate pMDI and that formoterol fumarate does not appreciably “mask” any lesser corticosteroid effect.
Komitee oli samuti arvamusel, et Flutiformi kortikosteroidi toime ei ole väiksem kui GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoril ja et formoteroolfumaraat ei varja väiksemat kortikosteroidi toimet märgatavalt.
These endpoints were demonstrably inhaled cortocosteroid-driven and/or inhaled corticosteroid dose-responsive and all provided rigorous statistical evidence that the inhaled corticosteroid effects of Flutiform were not less than those of fluticasone propionate + formoterol fumarate.
Need näitajad põhinesid silmnähtavalt inhaleeritaval kortikosteroidil ja/või olid inhaleeritava kortikosteroidi annuse suhtes tundlikud ning pakkusid ranget statistilist tõendusmaterjali, et Flutiformi inhaleeritava kortikosteroidi toime ei ole nõrgem kui flutikasoonpropionaadi ja formoteroolfumaraadi kombinatsiooni oma.
The PK study (Study FLT1501) which has given rise to concerns was conducted to evaluate the comparative safety of Flutiform when compared with the marketed monoproduct pMDIs.
Küsimusi tõstatanud farmakokineetiline uuring (FLT1501) viidi läbi selleks, et hinnata Flutiformi ohutust võrreldes ühte toimeainet sisaldavate turul saadaolevate dosaatorinhalaatoritega.
However, the specific formulation of a fixed-dose combination of these two well known active substances, fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate, is new.
Samas on nende kahe tuntud toimeaine - flutikasoonpropionaadi ja formoteroolfumaraadifikseeritud annusega kombinatsiooni ravimvorm uus.
Turning to the available data in the Applicant's studies, for the “Step-up” comparison the odds of “any” exacerbation were 33% higher in fluticasone propionate- than Flutiform-treated patients (p=0.019) whilst the annual exacerbation rate was 49% higher in fluticasone propionate- than Flutiform-treated patients (p=0.004).
Mis puudutab taotleja uuringutest saadud andmeid, siis oli lisaravi võrdluse puhul mis tahes ägenemise tõenäosus flutikasoonpropionaadi rühmas 33% suurem kui Flutiformiga ravitud patsientidel (p=0,019) ning aastane ägenemiste määr oli flutikasoonpropionaadi rühmas 49% suurem kui Flutiformiga ravitud patsientidel (p=0,004).
Literature data indicate that even if the PK data accurately reflect comparative pulmonary drug deposition for Flutiform versus GSK fluticasone propionate pMDI, such differences are not of clinical relevance.
Kirjandusest nähtub, et isegi kui farmakokineetilised andmed peegeldavad täpselt, kuidas ravim ladestub kopsus Flutiformiga ning GSK flutikasoonpropionaati sisaldava ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga manustamisel, ei ole need erinevused kliiniliselt olulised.
In conclusion, given the long-term predictive value of FEV1, given the static nature of FEV1 after 8 to 12 weeks of treatment, and given the pattern of the FEV1 data observed in the five pivotal studies, the CHMP considers there to be no reason to anticipate that the long-term exacerbation risk with Flutiform may exceed that with fluticasone propionate alone (the “Step-up” indication) or fluticasone propionate in combination with formoterol fumarate (the “Switch” indication).
Kokkuvõtteks leiab inimravimite komitee, et FEV1 pikaajalist prognoosiväärtust, FEV1 statistilist olemust 8-12-nädalase ravi järel ja viies katseuuringus täheldatud FEV1 arengut arvestades ei ole põhjust eeldada, et pikaajaline ägenemisoht Flutiformiga ületab flutikasoonpropionaadi monoteraapia oma (lisaravi näidustus) või flutikasoonpropionaadi ja formoteroolfumaraadi kombinatsiooni oma (ülemineku näidustus).
Turning to the data in the Applicant's clinical studies: For the “Step-up” indication both pre-dose and post-dose FEV1 effects at 8 to 12 weeks were significantly greater with Flutiform than with fluticasone propionate; for the “Switch” indication both pre-dose and post-dose FEV1 effects numerically favoured Flutiform over fluticasone propionate + formoterol fumarate (in both Per Protocol and Intention-to-Treat population comparisons).
Taotleja kliiniliste uuringute andmetest ilmnes, et lisaravi näidustusel olid nii manustamiseelsed kui ka manustamisjärgsed FEV1 toimed pärast 8-12-nädalast ravi Flutiformiga oluliselt suuremad kui flutikasoonpropionaadiga; ülemineku näidustusel olid nii manustamiseelsed kui ka manustamisjärgsed FEV1 toimed arvuliselt Flutiformi kasuks võrreldes flutikasoonpropionaadi ja formoteroolfumaraadi kombinatsiooniga (nii protokollijärgse kui ka ravikavatsusega populatsiooni võrdluses).
The apparent lower systemic availability of fluticasone propionate in Flutiform compared with GSK fluticasone propionate pMDI would not appear to result in a lesser clinical effect.
Flutiformis sisalduva flutikasoonpropionaadi väidetav väiksem süsteemne biosaadavus võrreldes GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga ei tähenda väiksemat kliinilist toimet.
The CHMP noted that the differences of the magnitude observed between Flutiform and GSK fluticasone propionate in Study FLT1501 (67% relative bioavailability) are within the same range of variance as observed within patients (from inhalation to inhalation), between different batches of the same product and between different inhalers containing the same or more than one of the same active substances and are without adverse clinical consequences, and therefore are likely to be clinically irrelevant.
Inimravimite komitee märkis, et uuringus FLT1501 täheldatud Flutiformi ja GSK flutikasoonpropionaatravimi erinevused (suhteline biosaadavus 67%) jäävad samasse erinevuste vahemikku, mida on täheldatud eri patsientide (inhalatsioonide lõikes), sama toote erinevate partiide ning sama või mitut samasugust toimeainet sisaldavate erinevate inhalaatorite puhul.
With regard to the “Step-up” indication, again the CHMP accepted the discussions presented by the Applicant and was of the view that the clinical effects of Flutiform in respect of asthma control are superior to the clinical effects of GSK fluticasone propionate administered alone.
Seoses lisaravi näidustusega nõustus inimravimite komitee taotleja mõttekäiguga ja leidis, et Flutiformi kliiniline toime seoses astma kontrolliga on suurem kui eraldi manustatud GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi kliiniline toime.
The data presented in respect of exacerbations demonstrate an increased protective benefit of Flutiform compared with GSK fluticasone propionate administered alone - the odds of any exacerbation occurring were 33% higher and the annual exacerbation rate was 49% higher in patients receiving GSK fluticasone propionate than in patients receiving Flutiform, p=0.019 and p=0.004, respectively.
Ägenemiste andmed näitavad Flutiformi suuremat kaitsvat toimet võrreldes eraldi manustatud GSK flutikasoonpropionaadiga: patsientidel, kellele manustati GSK flutikasoonpropionaati, oli ägenemise tõenäosus 33% ja aastane ägenemiste määr 49% kõrgem kui patsientidel, kellele manustati Flutiformi (vastavalt p=0,019 ja p=0,004).
The relative bioavailability of fluticasone propionate at steady state was 67% following Flutiform administration compared with GSK fluticasone propionate pMDI.
Flutikasoonpropionaadi suhteline biosaadavus Flutiformi manustamise järel oli püsikontsentratsioonil 67% võrreldes GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi manustamisega ühte toimeainet sisaldava dosaatorinhalaatoriga.
An annual exacerbation rate ratio of 0.98, i.e. very close to unity for the comparison of Flutiform 500µg/20µg versus fluticasone propionate 500µg + formoterol fumarate 24µg was therefore suggestive of non-inferiority but was not statistically definitive.
Aastaste ägenemiste määr oli 0,98 (s.t väga lähedal 1-le) Flutiformi 500 µg/20 µg vs. 500 µg flutikasoonpropionaadi ja 24 µg formoteroolfumaraadi kombinatsiooni võrdluses ja viitas seetõttu samaväärsusele, kuigi see näitaja ei olnud statistiliselt lõplik.
With regard to the “Switch” therapy, the CHMP accepted the discussions presented by the Applicant and was of the view that the clinical effects of Flutiform in respect of asthma control and exacerbation risk are comparable with/similar to the clinical effects of GSK fluticasone propionate and Novartis formoterol fumarate given concomitantly.
Ülemineku näidustusel nõustus inimravimite komitee taotleja mõttekäiguga ja leidis, et Flutiformi kliiniline toime seoses astma kontrolli ja ägenemisohuga on võrreldav/sarnane koos manustatud GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi ja Novartise formoteroolfumaraadi kliinilise toimega.
Furthermore, the discordance between the PK and PD data for Flutiform suggests that the PK data do not accurately reflect comparative pulmonary deposition and are not a valid surrogate for clinical effect.
Lisaks viitab Flutiformi farmakokineetiliste ja farmakodünaamiliste andmete lahknevus sellele, et farmakokineetilised andmed ei peegelda täpselt ravimi ladestumist kopsus ega ole seega kliinilise toime sobiv asendusnäitaja.
Of the five pivotal studies submitted with this Marketing Authorisation Application three studies were designed such that they facilitate a rigorous, internally validated examination as to whether the long-acting β2 agonist formoterol fumarate “masks” deficient corticosteroid effects of Flutiform upon pre-dose FEV1.
Kortikosteroidi mis tahes väiksema kliinilise toime varjamine pikatoimelise ß2-agonisti poolt Müügiloa taotlusega esitatud viiest katseuuringust olid kolm kavandatud selleks, et lihtsustada ranget sisehindamist, mille eesmärk on kindlaks teha, kas pikatoimeline β2-agonist formoteroolfumaraat varjab
The CHMP was of the view that clinical data generated over 6 to 12 months to further elucidate the level of asthma control and to further assess exacerbation rates seen with Flutiform compared with fluticasone propionate administered concomitantly with formoterol fumarate or administered alone, are not required.
Inimravimite komitee oli seisukohal, et 6-12-kuuline kliiniline uuring astma kontrolli taseme ja ägenemismäära hindamiseks, et võrrelda Flutiformi flutikasoonpropionaadiga (eraldi või koos formoteroolfumaraadiga manustatuna), ei ole vajalik.
Approximately 20 subjects in each arm of this parallel group study were administered Flutiform 500/20 (fluticasone propionate 500µg and formoterol fumarate 20µg) or GSK fluticasone propionate 500µg pMDI + Novartis formoterol fumarate 24µg pMDI.
Umbes 20 isikule paralleelrühmadega uuringu igas rühmas manustati Flutiformi 500/20 (500 µg flutikasoonpropionaati ja 20 µg formoteroolfumaraati) või GSK 500 µg flutikasoonpropionaati ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga ja lisaks Novartise 24 µg formoteroolfumaraati ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga.
The clinical findings suggest that fluticasone propionate in Flutiform is non-inferior in respect of clinical effects to GSK fluticasone propionate.
Kliinilised tulemused näitavad, et Flutiformis sisalduva flutikasoonpropionaadi kliiniline toime ei ole nõrgem kui GSK ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatori flutikasoonpropionaadi kliiniline toime.
Data submitted by the Applicant demonstrated that asthma control with Flutiform is superior to that with fluticasone propionate pMDI alone and that asthma control with Flutiform is similar to that with fluticasone propionate pMDI + formoterol fumarate pMDI.
Taotleja esitatud andmed näitasid, et astma on Flutiformiga paremini kontrollitud kui ühte toimeainet flutikasoonpropionaati sisaldava dosaatorinhalaatoriga ja et astma kontroll Flutiformiga on sarnane kumbagi toimeainet sisaldava dosaatorinhalaatoriga (flutikasoonpropionaat või formoteroolfumaraat koos manustatuna) tehtava raviga.
The pre-dose FEV1 data in this study which were again a demonstrably inhaled corticosteroid-mediated effect provided no evidence of a lesser inhaled corticosteroid effect with Flutiform than seen with fluticasone propionate + formoterol fumarate.
Selles uuringus ei osutanud ka manustamiseelse FEV1 andmed, mis olid taas inhaleeritava kortikosteroidi vahendatud, et Flutiformi inhaleeritava kortikosteroidi toime oleks nõrgem kui flutikasoonpropionaadi ja formoteroolfumaraadi kombinatsiooni toime.
Effects with the low dose of Flutiform (100µg/10µg) upon pre-dose FEV1 were similar to those with the high dose of GSK fluticasone propionate 500µg (alone or in combination with formoterol fumarate 24µg).
Flutiformi väiksema annuse (100 µg/10 µg) toime manustamiseelsele FEV1-le olid sarnane GSK suure 500 µg flutikasoonpropionaadi annuse toimega (eraldi või koos 24 µg formoteroolfumaraadiga manustatuna).
This comparison showed that despite a lower relative fluticasone propionate bioavailability, the effect upon pre-dose FEV1 (which was demonstrably mediated by fluticasone propionate alone in Study FLT3503) was numerically greater with Flutiform 500µg/20µg than with GSK fluticasone propionate 500µg (either alone or in conjunction with Novartis formoterol fumarate 24µg).
Võrdlus näitas, et hoolimata flutikasoonpropionaadi väiksemast suhtelisest biosaadavusest on manustamiseelne FEV1-toime (mida uuringus FLT3503 vahendas selgelt ainult flutikasoonpropionaat) arvuliselt suurem 500 µg/20 µg Flutiformi puhul kui 500 µg GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi puhul (kas eraldi või koos 24 µg Novartise formoteroolfumaraadiga manustatuna).
However, an analysis of annualised exacerbation rates in this study was able to differentiate the effects of high dose ICS-LABA (inhaled corticosteroid - long-acting β2 agonist) treatments (Flutiform 500µg/20µg and fluticasone propionate 500µg + formoterol fumarate 24µg) from low dose ICS-LABA treatment (fluticasone propionate 100µg/10µg) and fluticasone propionate 500µg monotherapy.
Siiski näitas aastaste ägenemiste analüüs erinevust inhaleeritava kortikosteroidi - pikatoimelise β2-agonisti (ICS-LABA) suure annuse (Flutiform 500 µg/20µg ja flutikasoonpropionaat 500 µg + formoteroolfumaraat 24 µg) ning inhaleeritava kortikosteroidi - pikatoimelise β2-agonisti väikese annuse (flutikasoonpropionaat 100 µg/10 µg) ja 500 µg flutikasoonpropionaadi monoteraapia ravitoimes.
In addition, the comparison of these PK data with PD data, Study FLT3503, shows that despite the lower relative bioavailability of fluticasone propionate in this new fixed-dose combination product the effect upon predose FEV1 (which was demonstrably mediated by fluticasone propionate alone in Study FLT3503) was numerically greater with Flutiform 500µg/20µg than with GSK fluticasone propionate 500µg (either administered alone or administered together with Novartis formoterol fumarate 24µg).
Lisaks näitas farmakokineetiliste ja farmakodünaamiliste andmete võrdlus (uuring FLT3503), et hoolimata flutikasoonpropionaadi väiksemast suhtelisest biosaadavusest uues fikseeritud annustega kombinatsioonravimis on manustamiseelne FEV1-toime (mida uuringus FLT3503 selgelt vahendas flutikasoonpropionaat) arvuliselt suurem 500 µg/20 µg Flutiformi kui 500 µg GSK flutikasoonpropionaadi puhul (kas eraldi või koos 24 µg Novartise formoteroolfumaraadiga manustatuna).
Study FLT 3503 also included a comparison with a lower dose of Flutiform and effects seen with this lower dose of Flutiform (100µg/10µg) upon pre-dose FEV1 were similar to those seen with the high dose of GSK fluticasone propionate 500µg (administered both alone or in combination with formoterol fumarate 24µg).
Uuring FLT3503 sisaldas ka võrdlust Flutiformi väiksema annusega: Flutiformi väikese annusega (100 µg/10 µg) täheldatud toime manustamiseelsele FEV1-le oli sarnane GSK suure 500 µg annuse flutikasoonpropionaadi toimega (eraldi või koos 24 µg formoteroolfumaraadiga manustatuna).
With regard to the “Switch” indication, the proportion of patients experiencing exacerbations in the pivotal “Switch” study (Study FLT3503) was similar in Flutiform and fluticasone propionate + formoterol fumarate treated patients (36.4% and 35.3%, respectively) although this analysis lacked discriminative capacity as the proportion of fluticasone propionate monotherapy-treated patients experiencing exacerbations was similar (37.4%).
Ülemineku katseuuringus (FLT3503) oli ägenemistega patsientide osakaal Flutiformiga ning flutikasoonpropionaadi ja formoteroolfumaraadiga ravitud patsientidel sarnane (vastavalt 36,4% ja 35,3%).
These PK and PD studies both included the same strengths/doses of Flutiform, GSK fluticasone propionate pMDI and Novartis formoterol fumarate pMDI, and all products in both studies were administered via the same spacing device, so allowing a valid comparison of PK and PD data.
Nii farmakokineetika kui ka farmakodünaamika uuringutes manustati sama tugevusega / samades annustes Flutiformi, GSK flutikasoonpropionaati ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga ja Novartise formoteroolfumaraati ühe toimeainega dosaatorinhalaatoriga.
The effect should gradually disappear within a few days in most cases.
Enamikul juhtudel peaks toime mõne päeva jooksul järk-järgult kaduma.
propranolol, amlodipine).
(nt propranolool, amlodipiin).
See also section 2 under ‘Warnings and precautions'.
Vt ka lõik 2 „Hoiatused ja ettevaatusabinõud“.
Mirvaso may also cause the following other side effects:
Mirvaso võib põhjustada ka teisi järgmisi kõrvaltoimeid:
In some cases, symptoms may extend beyond the treatment area.
Mõnel juhul võivad sümptomid laieneda üle ravipiirkonna.
Then pull the cap off.
Seejärel tõmmake kork ära.
Do not give this medicine to children and adolescents under the age of 18 years because the safety and efficacy has not been established for this age group.
Ärge andke seda ravimit kuni 18 aasta vanustele lastele ja noorukitele, sest ohutus ja efektiivsus ei ole selles vanuserühmas tõestatud.
Manufacturer Laboratoires Galderma Z.I.
Laboratoires Galderma Z.I.
This is particularly important in children under the age of 2 years (see ‘Do not use Mirvaso').
See on eriti tähtis kuni 2 aasta vanuste laste puhul (vt „ÄRGE kasutage Mirvasot”).
DATE OF FIRST AUTHORISATION/RENEWAL OF THE AUTHORISATION Date of first authorisation: 21 February 2014
ESMASE MÜÜGILOA VÄLJASTAMISE/MÜÜGILOA UUENDAMISE KUUPÄEV Müügiloa esmase väljastamise kuupäev: 21. veebruar 2014
Most of the cases were observed within the first 2 weeks of starting the treatment (see section 4.8).
Enamik juhtudest täheldati kahe esimese nädala jooksul alates ravi alustamise päevast (vt lõik 4.8).
Children aged less than 2 years.
Kuni 2 aasta vanused lapsed.
92927 La Défense Cedex France
92927 La Défense Cedex Prantsusmaa
Both children were reported to have made a full recovery within 24 hours.
Mõlemad lapsed paranesid 24 tunni jooksul täielikult.
Take the medicine pack with you, so the doctor knows what was swallowed.
Võtke ravimi pakend kaasa, et arst teaks, mida on alla neelatud.
Date of latest renewal: 22 November 2018
Viimase müügiloa uuendamise kuupäev: 24. novembri 2018
If anyone, especially a child, accidentally swallows Mirvaso, they may have serious side effects and need to be treated in a hospital.
Kui keegi, eriti laps, neelab Mirvasot kogemata alla, võivad tal tekkida tõsised kõrvaltoimed ja ta võib vajada haiglaravi.
Mirvaso works on a daily basis, starting with the first day of treatment.
Mirvaso toimib iga päev alates esimesest ravipäevast.
Study 1 + Study 2
1. uuring + 2. uuring
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other dermatological preparations, Other dermatologicals, ATC code: D11AX21.
Farmakoterapeutiline rühm: teised dermatoloogilised preparaadid, ATC-kood: D11AX21
* Adverse reactions reported from post-marketing data.
* Kõrvaltoimed, millest on teatatud turuletulekujärgsete andmete põhjal
A potential consequence of stopping the treatment before finishing the course of treatment is the disease to come back to its initial state.
Ravimi kasutamise katkestamise võimalik tagajärg enne ravikuuri lõppemist on haiguse esialgse seisundi taastekkimine.
The requirements for submission of periodic safety reports for this medicinal product are set out in the list of Union reference dates (EURD list) provided for under Article 107c(7) of Directive 2001/83/EC and any subsequently updates published on the European medicines web-portal.
Nõuded asjaomase ravimi perioodiliste ohutusaruannete esitamiseks on sätestatud direktiivi 2001/83/EÜ artikli 107c punkti 7 kohaselt liidu kontrollpäevade loetelus (EURD loetelu) ja iga hilisem uuendus avaldatakse Euroopa ravimite veebiportaalis.
The pump is child-resistant again.
Pump on taas lastekindel.
Of these, 539 completed 29 days of treatment and had data available to be included in the efficacy analysis at Day 29, with the majority being Caucasians between 18 and 65 years of age.
Neist 539 lõpetas 29-päevase ravi ja nende kohta olid saadaval andmed, mida kasutati 29. päeva seisuga toimunud efektiivsuse analüüsis ja enamik neist olid valge nahavärviga ja vanuses 18 kuni 65 aastat.
The experience of use of Mirvaso in patients aged above 65 years is limited (see also section 4.8).
Mirvaso kasutamise kogemus üle 65-aastastel patsientidel on piiratud (vt ka lõik 4.8).