natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Στην υπόθεση Τ-36/95, Syndicat national de l'industrie cimentière (SFIC) κατά Επιτροπής ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που oJ αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 1988· ακυρώνει το άρθρο 2, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που (f αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι συνήφθησαν συμφωνίες σχετικά με ανταλλαγές πληροφοριών επί των τιμών κατά τις συνεδριάσεις της εκτελεστικής επιτροπής της Cembureau —Association européenne du ciment και κατά το μέτρο που διαπιστώνεται η συμμετοχή της προσφεύγουσας στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 19 Μαρτίου 1984·
prices, to those two countries' producers' minimum prices for supplies of cement by lorry and, so far as concerns Luxembourg, the prices, inclusive of rebates, of that country's producer, annuls Article 4(1) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 June 1986 and after 31 May 1987; annuls Article 4(2) of Decision 94/815 in so faras it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 7 November 1988; annuls Article 4(3) (a) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 September 1986; annuls Article 5 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; annuls Article 9 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders each party to bear its own costs.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που & αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Μαΐου 1987· — ακυρώνει το άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 2, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που & αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 7 Νοεμβρίου 1988· ακυρώνει το άρθρο 5 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα· 34
In Case T-60/95 Irish Cement v Commission- annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 31 December 1988; annuls Article 2(1) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that there were agreements on the exchange of price information at the meetings of the Executive Committee of Cembureau — The European Cement Association, and in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 19 March 1984; annuls Article 2(2) of Decision 94/815 as regards the applicant in so far as it finds that the periodic circulation of information between Cembureau — The European Cement Association and its members related, so far as concerns the Belgian and Netherlands prices, to those two countries' producers' minimum prices for supplies of cement by lorry and, so far as concerns Luxembourg, the prices, inclusive of rebates, of that country's producer, annuls Article 4(1) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 September 1986 and after 31 May 1987; annuls Article 4(3) (a) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 September 1986; annuls Article 5 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant;
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που & αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση πριν από τις 11 Μαίου 1983 και μετά τις 23 Απριλίου 1986· — ακυρώνει το άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 1, στοιχείο γ', της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που & αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 23 Απριλίου 1986· — καθορίζει το ύψος του προστίμου που επφλήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 σε 2 407 000 ευρώ
Cimentos de Portugal ν Commission- annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 24 April 1989; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 4 312 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— ακυρώνει τα άρθρα 1, 3, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο ci, και 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα·
Companhia Geral de Cal e Cimento ν Commission: annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 24 April 1989; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 1 395 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— καθορίζει το ύψος τον προστίμου που επφλήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 σε 12 519 000 ενρώ καθορίζει το ύφος του προστίμου που επφλήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο 10 της αποφάσεως 94/815 σε 1 051 000 ευρώ·
annuls Article 2(2) of Decision 94/815 as regards the applicant in so far as it finds that the periodic circulation of information between Cembureau — The European Cement Association and its members related, so far as concerns the Belgian and Netherlands prices, to those two countries' producers' minimum prices for supplies of cement by lorry and, so far as concerns Luxembourg, the prices, inclusive of rebates, of that country's producer, annuls Article 5 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; annuls Article 9 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders each party to bear its own costs.
— φέρει τα δικαστικά της έξοδα και το ένα τρίτο των εξόδων της η προσφεύγουσα Επιτροπής
In Case T-64/95 Titan Cement Company ν Commission: annuls Articles 1, 4(4) (b), (c), (e), (g) and (h), 6 and 9 of Decision 94/815 in so far as they concern the applicant; orders the Commission to pay the costs.
— η προσφεύγουσα φέρει τα δικαστικά της έξοδα και το ένα τρίτο των εξόδων της Επιτροπής
fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 25 701 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 6 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που & αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση πριν από τις 18 Νοεμβρίου 1983· — καθορίζει το ύφος τον προστίμου που επφλήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 σε 14 248 000 ευρώ
In Case T-68/95 Holderbank Financière Glams ν Commission- annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 7 November 1988; annuls Article 4(1) of Decision 94/815 in so faras it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 31 May 1987; annuls Article 4(2) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 7 November 1988; annuls Article 4(4) (c) and (d) of Decision 94/815 in so far as they concern the applicant; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 1 918 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 2, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι συνήφθησαν συμφωνίες σχετικά με ανταλλαγές πληροφοριών επί των τιμών κατά τις συνεδριάσεις της εκτελεστικής επιτροπής της Cembureau —Association européenne du ciment και κατά το μέτρο που διαπιστώνεται η συμμετοχή της προσφεύγουσας στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 19 Μαρτίου 1984·
In Case T-70/95 Aker RGIASA ν Commissionannuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 7 November 1988; annuls Article 4(1) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 June 1986 and after 31 May 1987; annuls Article 4(2) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 7 November 1988; annuls Article 4(3) (a) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 September 1986; annuls Article 4(4) (h) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 14 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπίίπώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 1988·
dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
19) Στην υπόθεση Τ-50/95, Unicem κατά Επιτροπής ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση πριν από τις 9 Σεπτεμβρίου 1986 και μετά τις 3 Απριλίου 1992·
Cementerie del Tirreno ν Commission- annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 3 April 1992; annuls Article 2(1) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that there were agreements on the exchange of price information at the meetings of the Executive Committee of Cembureau The European Cement Association, and in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 14 January 1983; annuls Article 2(2) of Decision 94/815 as regards the applicant in so far as ü finds that the periodic circulation of information between Cembureau The European Cement Association and its members related, so far as concerns the Belgian and Netherlands prices, to those two countries' producers' minimum prices for supplies of cement by lorry and, so far as concerns Luxembourg, the prices, inclusive of rebates, of that country's producer; annuls Article 4(1) and (2) of Decision 94/815 in so far as they concern the applicant; annuls Article 4(3) (a) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 9 September 1986; annuls Article 5 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 7 471 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 5 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα· στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο
In Case T-88/95 Blue Circle Industries ν Commissionannuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 18 November 1983 and after 7 November 1988;
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 1, στοιχείο α, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπιστώνεται η συμμετοχή της προσφεύγουσας σε εναρμονισμένη πρακτική με τη Laf arge Coppée SA σχετική με τον περιορισμό της αυτονομίας τους συμπεριφοράς όσον αφορά τις πηγές παραγωγής
annuls Artide 4(1) of Decision 94/815 in so faras it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 31 May 1987; annuls Article 4(2) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 7 November 1988; annuls Article 4(4) (a) and (b) of Decision 94/815 in so far as they concern the applicant; annuls Article 6 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 18 November 1983; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 7 717 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear two thirds of its own costs.
23) Στην υπόθεση Τ-54/95, British Cement Association κατά Επιτροπής ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που tf αυτό δαζπιοτώνεται ότι η προσφεύγονσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 1988'
In Case T-103/95 Enosi Tsimentoviomichanion Ellados v Commission: annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 31 December 1988; annuls Article 2(1) of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that there were agreements on the exchange of price information at the meetings of the Executive Committee of Cembureau — The European Cement Association, and in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement after 19 March 1984; annuls Article 2(2) of Decision 94/815 as regards the applicant in so far as it finds that the periodic circulation of information between Cembureau — The European Cement Association and its members related, so far as concerns the Belgian and Netherlands prices, to those two countries' producers' minimum prices for supplies of cement by lorry and, so far as concerns Luxembourg, the prices, inclusive of rebates, of that country's producer, annuls Article 5 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; annuls Article 9 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it concerns the applicant; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders each party to bear its own costs.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Μαίου 1987· ακυρώνει το άρθρο 4, παράγραφοι 2 και 3, στοιχείο α, της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα·
In Case T-104/95 Tsimenta Challados ν Commission: annuls Article 1 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 18 November 1983 and after 1 September 1986; annuls Article 6 of Decision 94/815 in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in the infringement before 18 November 1983 and after 1 September 1986; fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 9 of Decision 94/815 at EUR 510 000; dismisses the remainder of the application; orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by the Commission; orders the Commission to bear one half of its own costs.'
— απορρίπτει την προσφυγή κατά τα λοιπά
Case T-72/98 Astilleros Zamacona SA ν Commission of the European Communities State aid
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα τρία τέταρτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
(State aid — Shipbuilding — Article 4(3) of Council Directive 90/684/EEC Determination of the ceiling for production aid) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
25) Στην υπόθεση Τ56/95, Castle Cement κατά Επιτροπής
Council Directive 90/684/EEC of 21 December 1990 on aid to shipbuilding was adopted.
— ακυρώνει τα άρθρα 1, 4, παράγραφος 4, στοιχείο α, 5 και 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα·
'The aid ceiling applicable to a contract shall be that in force at the date of signature of the final contract except when a ship delivered more than three years from the date of signing of the final contract when the ceiling applicable shall be that in force three years before the date of delivery of the ship'.
26) Στην υπόθεση Τ-57/95, Ανώνυμος Γενική Εταιρία Τσιμέντων Ηρακλής κατά Επιτροπής
It states that 'production aid in favour of shipbuilding and ship conversion may be considered compatible with the common market provided that the total amount of aid granted in support of any individual contract does not exceed, in grant equivalent, a common maximum ceiling expressed as a percentage of the contract value before aid'.
— καταδικάζει την Επιτροπή στα δικαστικά έξοδα
However, 'the Commission may grant an extension of the three-year delivery limit by the technical complexity of the individual shipbuilding project concerned or by delays
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 5 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα·
resulting from unexpected disruptions of a substantial and defensible nature'.
— απορρίπτει την προσφυγή κατά τα λοιπά
In December 1991, Astilleros Zamacona SA, a small shipyard in Bilbao, signed several shipbuilding contracts with a number of shipowners.
— κάθε διάδικος φέρει τα δικαστικά του έξοδα
The five contracts at issue in this case, concerning the building of tugboats, were numbered 300, 301, 318, 319 and 320.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό δΊαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση πριν από τις 9 Σεπτεμβρίου 1986 και μετά τις 31 Μαίου 1987·
The statement of reasons required by Article 190 of the Treaty, which is an essential procedural requirement, must disclose in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the institution which adopted the measure in question in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the measure and to enable the competent Community court to exercise its power of review.
— καθορίζει το ύψος του προστίμου που επφλήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 σε 2 065 000 ευρώ
At the date of signature of those contracts, the maximum authorised ceiling for the aid was 9%.
— η προσφεύγονσα Επιτροπής
As from 1 January 1992, that ceiling was reduced to 4.5%.
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
The Commission's explanations allow an understanding both of the factual context of the case and of the basis of the legal conclusions.
30) Στην νπόθεση Τ61/95, Cimpor — Cimentos de Portugal κατά Επιτροπής
Moreover, the pleadings lodged in this case show that the applicant perfectly understood the Commission's reasoning, each point of which it challenges.
— απορρίπτει την προσφυγή κατά τα λοιπά
Some days later, they were assigned to other shipowners, save for contract no 318.
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
The decision therefore includes a sufficient statement of reasons.
— καθορίζει το ύψος του προστίμου που επφλήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με το άρθρο 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 σε 1 395 000 ευρώ
On 10 February 1995, the Spanish authorities asked the Commission to extend the three-year delivery limit for the tugboats laid down in the directive.
— απορρίπτει την προσφυγή κατά τα λοιπά φέρει τα δικαστικά της έξοδα και το ένα τρίτο των εξόδων της η προσφεύγονσα Επιτροπής
Infringement of Article 4(3) of the directive and manifest error in assessing the facts
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
On 20 November 1996, the Commission decided to open the procedure under Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty with a view to examining the Spanish authorities' request of 10 February 1995.
32) Στην νπόθεση Τ-63/95, Associação Técnica da Industria de Cimento (ATIC) κατά Επιτροπής
The directive establishes the conditions in which operating aid in the shipbuilding industry may, exceptionally, be regarded as compatible with the common market.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 1988·
Moreover, the second subparagraph of Article 4(3) of the directive itself establishes a system that is in derogation which permits a departure from the principle of progressive reduction in the level of aid where ships are not built within the three-year period and which must be given a restrictive interpretation.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα·
By Commission Decision 98/157/EC of 5 November 1997 the Commission rejected the Spanish authorities' request on the ground that the aid did not comply with the provisions of Article 4(3) of the directive.
— απορρίπτει την προσφυγή κατά τα λοιπά
It reduced the level of aids so as to ensure that, in relation to each ship, the amount of the aid did not exceed 4.5% of the contractual value before aid.
— κάθε διάδικος φέρει τα δικαστικά του έξοδα
In those circumstances, the applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decision; and order the production of internal Commission documents;
— ακυρώνει τα άρθρα 1, 4, παράγραφος 4, στοιχεία β, γ, ε, ζ και η, 6 και 9 της αποφάσεως 94/815 ως προς την προσφεύγουσα·
Having regard to the rules concerning the strict interpretation of derogatory provisions and the burden of proof, both before the Commission and before the Court of First Instance, it must be concluded that it has not been established that the adoption of the Spanish port law of 24 November 1992 justified the postponement of the entry into force of the contracts and thus affected the working programme of the yard.
— καταδικάζει την Επιτροπή στα δικαστικά έξοδα
The applicant has, moreover, not established that the Commission made a legal or factual error in concluding that none of the circumstances relied upon fell within the second subparagraph of Article 4(3) of the directive.
— ακυρώνει το άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό διαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 31 Μαΐου 1987·
It is necessary to examine the pleas in law in support of this action, claiming, first, infringement of the duty to state reasons; second, infringement of Article 4(3) of the directive and manifest error in assessing the facts; and, third, infringement of the principle of proportionality.
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
The applicant affirms that as regard to the serious consequences of the decision on the applicant's position, and to the fact that, in the shipbuilding industry, delays in construction are common, the applicant maintains that reduction of the aid ceiling would be disproportionate in relation to a delay of seven to fourteen months.
35) Στην νπόθεση Τ68/95, Holderbank Financière Glams κατά Επιτροπής ακυρώνει το άρθρο 1 της αποφάσεως 94/815, κατά το μέτρο που ef αυτό δΊαπιστώνεται ότι η προσφεύγουσα μετέσχε στην προσαπτομένη παράβαση μετά τις 7 Νοεμβρίου 1988·
According to Article 4(3) of the directive, where a ship is delivered more than three years after the date of signature of the final contract, the ceiling applicable is that which was in force three years before the date on which the ship was delivered, and not that in force at the date on which the contract was signed. In this case, the ceiling applicable was therefore 4.5% and not 9%.
— απορρίπτει την προσφυγή κατά τα λοιπά φέρει τα δικαστικά της έξοδα και το ένα τρίτο των εξόδων της η προσφεύγουσα Επιτροπής
In this case it has been neither alleged nor established that the time-limit of three years laid down for the delivery of ships is abnormally short.
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
Moreover, the applicant has not produced any particular evidence to suggest that the reduction of the ceiling from 9% to 4.5% was excessive.
36) Στην νπόθεση Τ-69/95, Hornos Ibéricos Alba (Hisalba) κατά Επιτροπής
In those circumstances, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the application of a different ceiling, in this case less by half, according to whether or not the ships were delivered within a three-year time-limit from the signature of the final contract, would infringe the principle of proportionality.
38) Στην υπόθεση Τ-71/95, Scancem (pubi) κατά Επιτροπής
Orders the applicant to pay the costs.'
— η Επιτροπή φέρει τα δύο τρίτα των δικαστικών της εξόδων.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 14 March 2000.
39) Στην νπόθεση Τ-87/95, Cementir — Cementerie del Tirreno κατά Επιτροπής
Case C­225/98 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic