natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Στοπλαίσιοαυτό, ε ξ ε τ ά σ τ η κ ε τ ο π α ρ α δ ε κ τ ό τ ω ν α π ο δ ε ίξ ε ω ν π ο υ ε ίχ ε λ ά β ε ι υ π ό ψ η τ η ς η Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή κ α τ ά τ ο ν ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ω ν .
1) and to the absence of a provision obliging the Community institutions to consider, in anti-dumpingproceedings, whether and if so how far each exporter responsible for dumping individually contributesto the injury caused to the Community industry.
Ειδικότερα, τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο κ λ ή θ η κ ε ν α α π ο φ α ν θ ε ί ε π ί τ ο υ π α ρ α δ ε κ τ ο ύ κ α ι ε π ί τ ο υ β ά σ ι μ ο υ τ ο υ λ ό γ ο υ α κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ς τ ο ν ο π ο ί ο α ν τ λ ο ύ σ α ν ο ρ ισ μ έ ν ε ς α π ό τ ι ς π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ ε ς α π ό τ η ν π α ρ α β ία σ η τ η ς α ρ χ ή ς τ ο υ α π α ρ α β ία σ τ ο υ τ η ς κ α τ ο ικ ία ς .
It foundthat, for the purposes of determining the existence of injury, the Communitylegislature had chosen to use the territorial scope of one or more countries,considering all dumped imports from the country or countries concerned together.It therefore rejected the applicant's ground of challenge.
Ομοίως, ο ι π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ ε ς π α ρ α δ ε κ τ ώ ς α μ φ ισ β ή τ η σ α ν , σ τ ο π λ α ί σ ι ο π ρ ο σ φ υ γ ή ς α κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ς β ά λ λ ο υ σ α ς κ α τ ά τ η ς τ ε λ ικ ή ς α π ο φ ά σ ε ω ς , τ η ν ο μ ι μ ό τ η τ α τ ω ν ε ν τ ο λ ώ ν δ ι ε ν έ ρ γ ε ι α ς ε λ έ γ χ ω ν , ο ι ο π ο ί ε ς δ ε ν α π ο τ ε λ ο ύ ν π ρ ά ξ ε ι ς δ ε κ τ ικ έ ς π ρ ο σ φ υ γ ή ς κ α τ ά τ η ν έ ν ν ο ι α τ ο υ ά ρ θ ρ ο υ 173 τ η ς Σ υ ν θ ή κ η ς Ε Κ (ν υ ν , κατόπιντροποποιήσεως, άρθρου 230 ΕΚ).
First, it stated that this profit margin must be limited to the profit margin whichthe Community industry could reasonablycount on under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of the dumpedimports. imports.
Επίτηςουσίας, τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο έ κ ρ ι ν ε ό τ ι α υ τ ό ς ο λ ό γ ο ς α κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ς π ρ έ π ε ι ν α ν ο η θ ε ί ω ς α ν τ λ ο ύ μ ε ν ο ς α π ό τ η ν π α ρ α β ία σ η τ η ς γ ε ν ικ ή ς α ρ χ ή ς τ ο υ κ ο ι ν ο τ ικ ο ύ δ ικ α ί ο υ π ο υ ε ξ α σ φ α λ ίζ ε ι τ η ν π ρ ο σ τ α σ ία κ ά θ ε π ρ ο σ ώ π ο υ , φυσικούήνομικού, κ α τ ά τ ω ν δ υ σ α ν α λ ό γ ω ς ε π α χ θ ώ ν ή α υ θ α ι ρ έ τ ω ν π α ρ ε μ β ά σ ε ω ν τ η ς δ η μ ό σ ι α ς α ρ χ ή ς σ τ η σ φ α ί ρ α τ ω ν ι δ ι ω τ ικ ώ ν δ ρ α σ τ η ρ ι ο τ ή τ ω ν τ ο υ (α π ο φ ά σ ε ι ς τ ο υ Δ ικ α σ τ η ρ ί ο υ τ η ς 21η ς Σ ε π τ ε μ β ρ ί ο υ 1989, 46/87 και227/87, Η ο β ο Η χ ί κ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , Συλλογή1989, σ.
Second, where the undertakings in the Community industry have differentproduction costs, and thus different profit levels,the Community institutions have no choice, when determining the target price, but to calculate the weightedaverage of the production costs of the Community producers as a whole and to add to it the average profit margin which they consider reasonable in view of allthe relevant circumstances.
2859, καιτης 17η ς Ο κ τ ω β ρ ί ο υ 1989, 85/87, Ώ ο \ν Β β η β Ι ι α κ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , Συλλογή1989, σ. 3137, και 97/87 έως 99/87, Ό ο \ν Ο Η β π ι ί ο α ΙΙΐο έ ή ο α κ λ π κ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , Συλλογή 1989,
The Court added that the Council has no authorityto calculate the target price solely on the basis of the highestproduction costs, asto do so would result in the setting of a target price which is unrepresentative of the Community as a whole.
Συναφώς, τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο τ ό ν ισ ε , α π α ν τ ώ ν τ α ς σ τ η ν α ι τ ία σ η π ο υ α ν τ λ ε ί τ ο α π ό τ η ν α μ φ ισ β ή τ η σ η τ ο υ κ ύ ρ ο υ ς τ ω ν π ρ ά ξ ε ω ν ε λ έ γ χ ο υ , ότιαπότοάρθρο 14, παράγραφος 2, τουκανονισμού 17 π ρ ο κ ύ π τ ε ι ό τ ι ο ι έ λ ε γ χ ο ι π ο υ π ρ α γ μ α τ ο π ο ι ο ύ ν τ α ι μ ε α π λ ή ε ν τ ο λ ή β α σ ίζ ο ν τ α ισ τ η ν ε κ ο ύ σ ι α σ υ ν ε ρ γ α σ ία τ ω ν ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ω ν .
In the judgments of 28 September 1999 in Case T-612197 Cordis v Commission(under appeal, Case C-442199 P) and Case T-254197 Fruchthandelsgesellschaft Chemnitz v Commission, both not yet reported in the ECR, the applicants,companies incorporated under German law, sought the annulment of Commissiondecisions refusing to grant them additional import licences under the transitionalmeasures provided for in Article 30 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404193 of13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market in bananas (OJ 1993L 47, p. 1).
Συναφώς, π ρ έ π ε ι μ ε ν ν α μ η θ ί γ ο ν τ α ι τ α δ ικ α ιώ μ α τ α ά μ υ ν α ς σ τ ι ς δ ι ο ικ η τ ικ έ ς δ ι α δ ικ α σ ί ε ς ο ι ο π ο ί ε ς ε ν δ έ χ ε τ α ι ν α κ α τ α λ ή ξ ο υ ν σ τ η ν ε π ι β ο λ ή κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ν , ε κ ε ί ν ο ό μ ω ς π ο υ έ χ ε ισ η μ α σ ία ε ί ν α ι ν α α π ο φ ε ύ γ ε τ α ι τ ο ε ν δ ε χ ό μ ε ν ο α ν ε π α ν ό ρ θ ω τ η ς π ρ ο σ β ο λ ή ς τ ω ν δ ικ α ι ω μ ά τ ω ν α υ τ ώ ν σ τ ο π λ α ί σ ι ο τ η ς π ρ ο κ α τ α ρ κ τ ικ ή ς έ ρ ε υ ν α ς , η ο π ο ία μ π ο ρ ε ί ν α έ χ ε ικ α θ ο ρ ισ τ ικ ό χ α ρ α κ τ ή ρ α γ ι α τ η ν α π ό δ ε ι ξ η τ ο υ π α ρ α ν ό μ ο υ χ α ρ α κ τ ή ρ α τ ω ν ε ν ε ρ γ ε ιώ ν τ ω ν ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ω ν (α π ο φ ά σ ε ι ς τ ο υ Δ ικ α σ τ η ρ ί ο υ τ η ς 18η ς Ο κ τ ω β ρ ί ο υ 1989, 374/87, Ο τ ^β π ικ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , Συλλογή 1989, σ.
In Case T-254197 the Commission had considered that the case of Fruchthandelsgesellschaft Chemnitz was not one of excessive hardship such as tojustify the special grant of import licences because it appeared from the facts thatthis company, which was formed after the publication of Regulation No 404/93in the Official Journal of the European Communities, could not have actedwithout having been able to foresee the consequences which its action would haveafter the establishment of the common organisation of the market in bananas. The Court confirmed that analvsis and dismissed the action.
3283, κ α ι τ ο υ Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο υ τ η ς 8ης τ ι ς α ι τ ή σ ε ι ς π α ρ ο χ ή ς α π ο φ ά σ ε ι ς (ά ρ θ ρ ο 11, τ ο υ λ ό γ ο υ α υ τ ο ύ α υ τ ό τ ο υ λ ό γ ο υ π ο υ τ ι ς α π ο φ ά σ ε ι ς π ε ρ ί
Issues of admissibility raised by actions in the field of agricultural policy are to be found in the section onadmissibility.
Μ αρτίου 1995, Τ -34/93,8ο ά έ ΐ έ ζ έ η έ τ α ΐ β κ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , Συλλογή 1995, σ. 11-545).
1) could be discontinuedin the event of a serious breach of fundamentalobligations.
Έτσι, η Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή δ ε ν μ π ο ρ ε ί ν α ε π ι β ά λ ε ισ τ ι ς ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ι ς τ η ν υ π ο χ ρ έ ω σ η ν α δ ώ σ ο υ ν α π α ν τ ή σ ε ι ς α π ό τ ι ς ο π ο ί ε ς θ α α π ο δ ε ικ ν υ ό τ α ν η ύ π α ρ ξ η π α ρ α β ά σ ε ω ς , μ ε τ η ν α π ό δ ε ι ξ η τ η ς ο π ο ία ς β α ρ ύ ν ε τ α ι η ί δ ι α η Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή .
The Court, which consideredthat the case-law of the Court of Justice concerning the award of public workscontracts could be applied to the case before it, held that the Commission wasobliged to specify clearly in the notice of invitation to tender the subject-matterand the conditions of the tendering procedure, and to comply strictly with theconditions laid down, so as to afford equality of opportunity to all tenderers whenformulating their tenders.
Π ε ρ α τ ώ ν ο ν τ α ς τ η ν ε ξ έ τ α σ η τ ο υ μ ε γ ν ώ μ ο ν α τ α ό ρ ι α α υ τ ά , τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο α π έ ρ ρ ιψ ε τ ο υ ς λ ό γ ο υ ς α κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ς π ο υ π ρ ο έ β α λ α ν ο ι π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ ε ς .
In particular, the Commission could not subsequentlyamend the conditions of the tendering procedure, and in particular those relatingto the tender to be submitted, in a manner not laid down by the notice ofinvitation to tender itself, without offending against the principle of transparency.
Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο υ π ε ν θ ύ μ ισ ε ό τ ι ό τ α ν τ ο ν ο μ ικ ό π ρ ό σ ω π ο π ο υ ε ίχ ε τ η δ ι α χ ε ί ρ ισ η τ η ς ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ω ς κ α τ ά τ ο ν χ ρ ό ν ο τ η ς δ ι α π ρ ά ξ ε ω ς τ η ς π α ρ α β ά σ ε ω ς ε ξ α κ ο λ ο υ θ ε ί ν α υ φ ί σ τ α τ α ι ν ο μ ικ ώ ς , η Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς μ π ο ρ ε ί ν α τ ο υ α π ο δ ώ σ ε ι τ η ν ε υ θ ύ ν η τ η ς π α ρ α β ά σ ε ω ς .
T-220197H & R Ecroydv Commission, not yet reported in the ECR, will be dealtwith now under this heading. The judgment dealswith the effects of a declarationthat a provision in a regulation is unlawful and with the resulting obligations forthe Community institutions. The Court of Justicehad, on a reference for a preliminary ruling, declared invalida provision of Regulation No 857184,20 as amended (udgment in CaseC-127194 C-127194
Κατάσυνέπεια, ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ι ς κ α τ έ χ ο υ σ ε ς σ υ λ λ ο γ ικ ή δ ε σ π ό ζ ο υ σ α θ έ σ η μ π ο ρ ο ύ ν ν α έ χ ο υ ν κ ο ι ν ή ή α τ ο μ ικ ή κ α τ α χ ρ η σ τ ικ ή σ υ μ π ε ρ ι φ ο ρ ά .
The Court of First Instancestated, on the basis of case-law of the Court of Justice, that that judgment had the legal effect of requiring the competent Community institutions to adopt themeasures necessary to remedy the illegality.
Εξάλλου, η ύ π α ρ ξ η τ η ς δ ε σ π ό ζ ο υ σ α ς θ έ σ ε ω ς τ η ς π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ α ς σ τ η ν α γ ο ρ ά β ι ο μ η χ α ν ικ ή ς ζ ά χ α ρ η ς έ γ ι ν ε δ ε κ τ ή α π ό τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο μ ε μ ο ν α δ ικ ή α ι τ ι ο λ ο γ ία ό τ ι η π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ α κ α τ ε ίχ ε τ μ ή μ α τ η ς α γ ο ρ ά ς α ν ώ τ ε ρ ο τ ο υ 50 %.
In those circumstances, they wereto take the measures that were required in order to comply with the judgmentcontaining the ruling in the same way as they were, under Article 176 of the ECTreaty (now Article 233 EC), in the case of a judgment annulling a measure ordeclaring that the failure of a Community institution to act was unlawful.
Συναφώς, τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο θ ε ώ ρ η σ ε ό τ ι τ α σ τ ο ιχ ε ία α υ τ ά π ε ρ ι ε ίχ α ν έ ν δ ε ι ξ η ό σ ο ν α φ ο ρ ά τ η ν ε κ μ έ ρ ο υ ς τ η ς Μ ί ο Γ Ο δ ο ί ί ε φ α ρ μ ο γ ή α ν ί σ ω ν ό ρ ω ν σ τ η ν κ α ν α δ ικ ή κ α ι τ η ν κ ο ι ν ο τ ικ ή α γ ο ρ ά γ ι α ισ ο δ ύ ν α μ ε ς π α ρ ο χ έ ς κ α ι τ ο ν υ π ε ρ β ο λ ικ ό χ α ρ α κ τ ή ρ α τ ω ν κ ο ι ν ο τ ικ ώ ν τ ι μ ώ ν .
The Court added, however, that, for that purpose, the institutions had not only toadopt the essential legislative or administrative measures but also to make goodthe damage which had resulted from the unlawful act, subject to fulfilment of theconditions laid down in the second paragraph of Article 2L5 of the EC Treaty,namely the presenceof fault, harm and a causallink.
Τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο υ π ε ν θ ύ μ ισ ε ό τ ι , ό τ α ν η δ ι α δ ικ α σ ία ε ξ ε τ ά σ ε ω ς τ η ς κ α τ α γ γ ε λ ία ς έ χ ε ι
Thus, the Commissioncould have initiated action with a view to compensating the applicant, because theconditions for non-contractualliabilitv of the Community to arise were satisfied.
Ενπροκειμένω, η π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ α α μ φ ισ β η τ ο ύ σ ε τ η ν α π ό φ α σ η τ η ν ο π ο ία ε ίχ ε λ ά β ε ι η Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή δ υ ν ά μ ε ι τ ο υ ά ρ θ ρ ο υ 6,
The European Social Fund ("the ESF") participatesin the financing of operationsconcerning vocational training and guidance,the successfulcompletion of whichis guaranteedby the Member States.
παράγραφος 1, στοιχείοα', τουενλόγωκανονισμού (ό π ω ς α υ τ ό ε ίχ ε κ α τ ά τ η δ ι ο ρ θ ω μ έ ν η δ ι α τ ύ π ω σ η τ ο υ , ΕΕ1990, Ι, 257, σ.
The applicable legislation provides that,when the financial assistance is not used in accordance with the conditions set outin the decision of approval of the ESF, the Commission may suspend, reduce orwithdraw the assistance.
13), κ α ισ ύ μ φ ω ν α μ ε τ η ν ο π ο ία η σ ύ σ τ α σ η κ ο ι ν ή ς ε π ιχ ε ι ρ ή σ ε ω ς π ο υ τ η ς ε ίχ ε κ ο ι ν ο π ο ι η θ ε ί δ ε ν σ υ ν ισ τ ο ύ σ ε σ υ γ κ έ ν τ ρ ω σ η κ α τ ά τ η ν έ ν ν ο ι α τ ο υ ά ρ θ ρ ο υ 3 τοκανονισμού4064/89 καιδενενέπιπτε, συνεπώς, σ τ ο π ε δ ί ο ε φ α ρ μ ο γ ή ς τ ο υ κ α ν ο ν ισ μ ο ύ α υ τ ο ύ .
It was decisions by the Commission reducing financialassistancegranted by the ESF to Portuguese companies that the Court had to dealwith in its judgments of 16 September 1999 in Case T-182196 Partex v Comm is si an (under appeal, Case C'465199 P) and of 29 September 1999 in Case T - 1 261 97 Sonasa v Commission, both not yet reported in the ECR.
Εξάλλου, η υ π ό θ ε σ η α υ τ ή ε π έ τ ρ ε ψ ε σ τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο ν α δ ι ε υ κ ρ ι ν ί σ ε ι τ η ν έ κ τ α σ η τ ω ν δ ικ α ι ω μ ά τ ω ν ά μ υ ν α ς .
Council Regulation (EEC) No 857i84of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of thelevy referred to in Article 5cof Regulation (EEC) No 804i68in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 1984
δ υ ν η τ ικ ο ύ δ ικ α ι ο ύ χ ο υ τ ο υ ε π ί δ ικ ο υ μ η χ α ν ισ μ ο ύ α π ο σ β έ σ ε ω ς , ό π ω ς κ α ι ο π ο ι ο ν δ ή π ο τ ε ά λ λ ο ν ε π ιχ ε ι ρ η μ α τ ία π ο υ β ρ ί σ κ ε τ α ι , πραγματικάήδυνητικά, σεταυτόσημηκατάσταση. Συνεπώς, τ ο α π α γ ο ρ ε υ θ έ ν φ ο ρ ο λ ο γ ικ ό π λ ε ο ν έ κ τ η μ α δ ε ν ε ίχ ε α τ ο μ ικ ό χ α ρ α κ τ ή ρ α .
ln Partex v Commission, the Court clarified, to the extent necessary,the effectof certification by the Member State concerned of the accuracy of the facts andaccounts contained in claims for payment of the balance of the financial assistance("final payment claims") 5 and confirmed that the Member State may alter itsassessment of a final payment claim if it considersthat it contains irregularitieswhich had not been previously detected.
Π-1971) κ α ι δ ε ν ε ίχ ε τ η ν ι δ ι ό τ η τ α τ ο υ δ ι α π ρ α γ μ α τ ε υ τ ή κ α τ ά τ η ν έ ν ν ο ι α τ ω ν α π ο φ ά σ ε ω ν τ ο υ Δ ικ α σ τ η ρ ί ο υ τ η ς 2 α ς Φ ε β ρ ο υ α ρ ί ο υ 1988, 67/85, 68/85 και 70/85, Υ α η ά β τ Κ ο ο γ κ λ π κ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς (Συλλογή1988, σ.
The Court examined, under one of the pleas for annulment,the reasonablenessof the period which had elapsed between the lodging of the final payment claimby the national authorities in October 1989 and the adoption of the contesteddecision in August 1996.
219), κ α ι τ η ς 24η ς Μ α ρ τ ί ο υ 1993, Ο-313/90, ΟΙΚΡ8 κ λ π κ α τ ά Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , Συλλογή1993, σ. 1-1125), η π ρ ο σ φ υ γ ή τ η ς ή τ α ν α π α ρ ά δ ε κ τ η .
Having regard to a series of events,it was held that inthis instance each of the procedural steps leading up to the adoption of thecontested decision had taken place within a reasonable time.
Επιτροπής (η ο π ο ία δ η μ ο σ ι ε υ θ ε ί σ τ η Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο δ ε ν έ χ ε ι α κ ό μ α Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , το
It is to be noted above all that the Court annulled the contested decision in part,on the grounds of insufficient reasoning.
Ι γ ν β Γ & β κ α ι Ε β ο Η -8ί α Η
Referring to the judgment in Case
Επομένωςστομέτροαυτό, δ ικ α ι ο λ ο γ ε ί τ α ι η π α ρ α π ο μ π ή σ τ η ν ο μ ο λ ο γ ία σ χ ε τ ικ ά μ ε τ ι ς κ ρ α τ ικ έ ς ε ν ισ χ ύ σ ε ι ς π ο υ ε μ π ί π τ ο υ ν σ τ η Σ υ ν θ ή κ η Ε Κ , ι δ ί ω ς τ ι ς α π ο φ ά σ ε ι ς π ο υ δ ι ε υ κ ρ ι ν ίζ ο υ ν τ η ν έ ν ν ο ι α τ η ς κ ρ α τ ικ ή ς ε ν ισ χ ύ σ ε ω ς π ρ ο ς ε κ τ ί μ η σ η τ η ς ν ο μ ι μ ό τ η τ α ς α π ο φ ά σ ε ω ν π ο υ α φ ο ρ ο ύ ν ε ν ισ χ ύ σ ε ι ς ο ι ο π ο ί ε ς α ν α φ έ ρ ο ν τ α ισ τ ο ά ρ θ ρ ο 4, στοιχείογ, τ η ς Σ υ ν θ ή κ η ς Ε Κ Α Χ .
T-85194Branco v Commission [1995] ECR II-45, the Court stated that in a case,such as the instance before it, where the Commission purely and simply confirmed the proposal of a Member State to reduce financial assistance initiallygranted, a Commission decision could be regarded as sufficiently reasoned eitherwhen the decision itself clearly demonstrated the reasons justifying the reductionin the assistance or, if that was not the case, when it referred sufficiently clearly to a measure of the competent national authorities in the Member State concernedin which those authorities clearly set out the reasons for such a reduction.
Δ ε δ ο μ έ ν ο υ ό τ ι α υ τ ή η δ ι α κ ρ ι τ ικ ή ε υ χ έ ρ ε ι α σ υ ν ε π ά γ ε τ α ι π ο λ ύ π λ ο κ ε ς ε κ τ ι μ ή σ ε ι ς ο ικ ο ν ο μ ικ ή ς κ α ικ ο ι ν ω ν ικ ή ς φ ύ σ ε ω ς , ο δ ικ α σ τ ικ ό ς έ λ ε γ χ ο ς μ ι α ς α π ο φ ά σ ε ω ς τ η ς Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή ς , ληφθείσαςστο
Inaddition, if it appeared from the file that the Commission did not diverge on anyparticular point from the measures adopted by the national authorities, it couldproperly be considered that the content of those measures formed part of thereasons given for the Commission's decision, at least in so far as the personreceiving the assistance had been able to take cognisancethereof.
Ειδικότερα, δ ε ν ε ν α π ό κ ε ι τ α ισ τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο ν α υ π ο κ α τ α σ τ ή σ ε ι τ ο ν ε κ δ ό ν τ α τ η ν α π ό φ α σ η σ τ η ν ο ικ ο ν ο μ ικ ή τ ο υ ε κ τ ί μ η σ η .
The Court found that, in this instance, those conditions were not met as regards severalreductions in the sums sought by the applicant in his final paymentclaim. claim.
α π η ύ θ υ ν ε δ ι ά ρ κ ε ι α έ γ γ ρ α φ ο ε ν ώ π ι ο ν σ τ η ν τ ο υ
Admissibility of actions under the fourth paragraph of Article 173 of the EC TreaQTreaQ
Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή κ α τ ά τ η τ η ς τηνουσία, κ α θ ό σ ο ν η κ α τ α γ γ έ λ λ ο υ σ α ε π ιχ ε ί ρ η σ η δ ι α δ ικ α σ ία ς .
The Court dismissed a number of actions seeking the annulment either ofdecisions not addressed to the applicants or of measures of a legislative nature.
Α υ τ ή η ο ρ ι ο θ έ τ η σ η τ ο υ π ε δ ί ο υ ε φ α ρ μ ο γ ή ς τ η ς ε ξ α ι ρ έ σ ε ω ς έ χ ε ισ κ ο π ό ν α δ ι α σ φ α λ ίζ ε ι , αφενός, τ η ν π ρ ο σ τ α σ ία τ η ς ε σ ω τ ε ρ ικ ή ς ε ρ γ α σ ία ς σ τ η ν Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή κ α ι , αφετέρου, τ η ν ε χ ε μ ύ θ ε ι α κ α ι τ η ν π ρ ο σ τ α σ ία τ η ς α ρ χ ή ς τ ο υ ε π α γ γ ε λ μ α τ ικ ο ύ α π ο ρ ρ ή τ ο υ τ ω ν δ ικ η γ ό ρ ω ν .
In three cases Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Luftfahrt-Unternehmen and Hapag-Lloyd v Commission, referred to above in relation to State aid, andjudgments of 8 July 1999 in CaseT-168195 Eridania and Others v Council (underappeal, Case C-352199 P) and Case T-158/95 Eridania and Others v Council(under appeal, Case C-351199 P), both notyet reported in the ECR - the actionswere dismissed by means of a judgment, in the others by an order.
Η α ρ χ ή α υ τ ή π ρ έ π ε ι ν α τ η ρ ε ί τ α ι α κ ό μ η κ α ι α ν η π ρ ο σ κ ό μ ισ η τ ω ν ε γ γ ρ ά φ ω ν α υ τ ώ ν σ ε δ ι α δ ικ α σ ία ε ν ώ π ι ο ν τ ο υ κ ο ι ν ο τ ικ ο ύ δ ικ α σ τ ή μ π ο ρ ε ί ν α ε ί ν α ι ε π ι ζ ή μ ι α γ ι α τ η ν Ε π ι τ ρ ο π ή . Τ ο γ ε γ ο ν ό ς ό τ ι έ χ ε ι α σ κ η θ ε ί π ρ ο σ φ υ γ ή α κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ς κ α τ ά α π ο φ ά σ ε ω ς λ η φ θ ε ί σ α ς μ ε τ ά τ ο π έ ρ α ς δ ι ο ικ η τ ικ ή ς δ ι α δ ικ α σ ία ς ε ί ν α ισ υ ν α φ ώ ς α λ υ σ ι τ ε λ ή ς .
In addition to the instances already referred to where actions for the annulmentof decisions in the fields of State aid and access to documents were inadmissible,the Court declared inadmissible a number of actions for the annulment ofregulations in the fields of agricultural and fisheries policy (in particular, ordersof 26 March 1999 in CaseT-114196 Biscuiterie-confiserie LOR and Confiserie du Tech v Commission, not yet reported in the ECR; of 29 April 1999 in Case T-78198 Unione provinciale degli agricoltori di Firenze and Others v Commission,not yet reported in the ECR; of 8 July 1999 in CaseT-12196 Area Cova and
Η κ ο ι ν ο λ ό γ η σ η τ ο υ π ρ ο π α ρ α σ κ ε υ α σ τ ικ ο ύ α υ τ ο ύ ε γ γ ρ ά φ ο υ , π ο υ α φ ο ρ ο ύ σ ε τ η φ ά σ η τ η ς έ ρ ε υ ν α ς σ τ ο π λ α ί σ ι ο τ η ς δ ι α δ ικ α σ ία ς τ ο υ ά ρ θ ρ ο υ α υ τ ο ύ , θ α μ π ο ρ ο ύ σ ε ν α β λ ά ψ ε ι τ η ν κ α λ ή δ ι ε ξ α γ ω γ ή τ η ς δ ι α δ ικ α σ ία ς α υ τ ή ς , σ τ ο ν β α θ μ ό π ο υ ο σ κ ο π ό ς τ η ς , π ο υ ε ί ν α ι ν α π α ρ ά σ χ ε ισ τ ο κ ρ ά τ ο ς μ έ λ ο ς τ η δ υ ν α τ ό τ η τ α ν α σ υ μ μ ο ρ φ ω θ ε ί ο ικ ε ι ο θ ε λ ώ ς π ρ ο ς τ ι ς ε π ι τ α γ έ ς τ η ς Σ υ ν θ ή κ η ς ή , ενδεχομένως, ν α τ ο υ δ ώ σ ε ι τ η ν ε υ κ α ι ρ ία ν α δ ικ α ι ο λ ο γ ή σ ε ι τ η θ έ σ η τ ο υ , θ α ^π ο ^ο ν ο Ε ν α δ ι α κ υ β ε υ θ ε ί .
Others v Council and Commission and in CaseT-I94195 Area Cova and Othersv Council, neither yet reported in the ECR (under appeal, Cases C-300199 P and C- 34 U 99 P); of 9 November 1999 in Case T-114199 CSR Pamprytv Commission,not yet reported in the ECR; and of 23 November 1999 in Case T-I73198 Uniönde Pequefios Agricultoresv Council, not yet reported in the ECR; and judgmentsin Case T-168/95 Eridania and Others v Council and in Case T-158/95 Eridania and Others v Council, cited above) and of customs nomenclature (order of 29April 1999 in Case T-I20198 Alce v Commission, not yet reported in the ECR).Finally, the Court held that an application for annulment of a regulation wasadmissible in its judgment of 1 December 1999 in Joined Cases T-125196 and T - 15 21 96 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica and C.H. Boehringer Sohn v
π ο υ τ η ς
Commission, not yet reported in the ECR.
Η & υΐ3ΐ & , τ ο ε π ι τ ρ έ ψ ε ι τ η ν π ρ ό σ β α σ η σ τ η ν έ κ θ ε σ η π ε ρ ι ε ίχ ε ε υ α ί σ θ η τ ε ς π λ η ρ ο φ ο ρ ί ε ς η έ θ ι γ ε τ ι ς σ χ έ σ ε ι ς τ η ς Ε υ ρ ω π α ϊκ ή ς
The developments in the case-law in L999 concern the following matters:establishing the point from which time starts to run for bringing an action,possession of a legal interest in bringing proceedings and standing to bring proceedings.
Τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο π α ρ α τ ή ρ η σ ε , καταρχάς, ό τ ι τ ο Σ υ μ β ο ύ λ ι ο ε ίχ ε ε ξ ε τ ά σ ε ι δ ε ό ν τ ω ς τ ο α ί τ η μ α π ρ ο σ β ά σ ε ω ς σ τ ο έ γ γ ρ α φ ο .
As regards the point from which time starts to run, the fifth paragraph of Article I73 of the EC Treaty provides that the time-limit of two months 26 forbringing an action for annulment starts to run from publication of the measure or
Τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο α π έ ρ ρ ιψ ε ω ς α β ά σ ι μ ε ς τ ι ς τ έ σ σ ε ρ ι ς π ρ ο σ φ υ γ έ ς , μ ε τ ι ς ο π ο ί ε ς ζ η τ ή θ η κ ε η α κ ύ ρ ω σ η κ α ν ο ν ισ μ ώ ν τ ο υ Σ υ μ β ο υ λ ί ο υ π ε ρ ί ε π ι β ο λ ή ς ο ρ ισ τ ικ ώ ν δ α σ μ ώ ν α ν τ ι ν τ ά μ π ι ν γ κ ε π ί τ ω ν ε ισ α γ ω γ ώ ν α π ό χ ώ ρ ε ς μ η μ έ λ η τ η ς Κ ο ι ν ό τ η τ α ς .
Without prejudice to ttre extensions of time-limits on account of distance from Luxembourg, specified in Annex II to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justieeand applicable to the Court of First Instance by virtue of Article 102(2) of its Rules of Procedure.
Ενπροκειμένω, ε π ί τ η ς π ο σ ό τ η τ α ς τ ω ν α ν α π τ ή ρ ω ν π ο υ κ α τ ά γ ο ν τ α ν α π ό τ ι ς τ ρ ε ι ς χ ώ ρ ε ς π ο υ α φ ο ρ ο ύ σ ε η έ ρ ε υ ν α (τ ι ς Φ ι λ ι π π ί ν ε ς , τ η ν Τ α ϊ λ ά ν δ η κ α ι τ ο Μ ε ξ ικ ό ), τ ο μ έ ρ ο ς ε κ ε ί ν ω ν π ο υ ε ίχ α ν κ α τ α σ κ ε υ α σ θ ε ί σ τ ι ς Φ ι λ ι π π ί ν ε ς κ α ι ε ξ α χ θ ε ία π ό τ η ν δ ν /ε ά ί δ ΐ ι Μ α ί δ ΐ ι Ρ ΐ ι ΐ ΐ ί ρ ρ ΐ η β δ α ν τ ι π ρ ο σ ώ π ε υ ε , κατάτηνπροσφεύγουσα, το 0,0083 %.
In CAS Succhi di Fruttav Commission,cited above, the Court took the view that a reasonable period for requesting thefull text of the contested decision had "long since elapsed", as a period of threemonths separated the date on which, at the latest,the contested decision had cometo the applicant's knowledge and the date on which it received a copy of thatdecision in proceedings for interim measures before the President of the Court.
Ε ν ό ψ ε ι τ ο υ γ ρ ά μ μ α τ ο ς ο ρ ισ μ έ ν ω ν δ ι α τ ά ξ ε ω ν τ ο υ κ α ν ο ν ισ μ ο ύ (Ε Κ ) 384/96 τ ο υ Σ υ μ β ο υ λ ί ο υ , της 22α ς Δ ε κ ε μ β ρ ί ο υ 1995, γ ι α τ η ν ά μ υ ν α κ α τ ά τ ω ν ε ισ α γ ω γ ώ ν π ο υ α π ο τ ε λ ο ύ ν α ν τ ικ ε ί μ ε ν ο ν τ ά μ π ι ν γ κ ε κ μ έ ρ ο υ ς χ ω ρ ώ ν μ η μ ε λ ώ ν τ η ς Ε υ ρ ω π α ϊκ ή ς Κ ο ι ν ό τ η τ α ς (Ε Ε Ε 56, σ.
While a legal interest in bringing proceedings is not expressly required by Article 173 of the EC Treaty, it is none the less a condition which must besatisfied if an action for annulment is to be admissible.
Συνεπώς, τ ο Π ρ ω τ ο δ ικ ε ί ο α π έ ρ ρ ιψ ε τ ο ν λ ό γ ο α κ υ ρ ώ σ ε ω ς π ο υ π ρ ο έ β α λ ε η π ρ ο σ φ ε ύ γ ο υ σ α .
In particular, a naturalor legal person must demonstratea personal interest in the annulment of thecontested measure.
δ ι ε υ κ ρ ί ν ισ ε ό τ ι α υ τ ό τ ο π ε ρ ι θ ώ ρ ι ο κ έ ρ δ ο υ ς σ τ ο π ε ρ ι θ ώ ρ ι ο κ έ ρ δ ο υ ς π ο υ η κ ο ι ν ο τ ικ ή λ ο γ ικ ώ ς ν α α ν α μ έ ν ε ι υ π ό τ ο υ ς σ υ ν ή θ ε ι ς δ ε ν υ π ή ρ χ α ν ο ι α π ο τ ε λ ο ύ σ ε ς α ν τ ικ ε ί μ ε ν ο
Thus, an action brought by olive oil producers for the annulment of Regulation No 644198in so far as it provided for registration solely