natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Οι αποφάσεις που λαμβάνονται δυνάμει του άρθρου 38 της Συμβάσεως των Βρυξελλών από το δικαστήριο στο οποίο ασκείται η προσφυγή δεν μπορούν να θεωρηθούν ως "αποφάσεις επί της προσφυγής" κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 37, παράγραφος 2, της Συμβάσεως των Βρυξελλών και, επομένως, δεν μπορούν να αποτελέσουν το αντικείμενο αιτήσεως αναιρέσεως.
The second question submitted by the National Court had to be understood as seeking to determine whether Article 14(2)(c) of Regulation No. 1408/71, as in force in February 1988, had to be interpreted as rendering unenforceable against the persons covered by it or to their successors (a) a clause of the applicable legislation of a Member State under which admission to a prescribed social security scheme is subject to the condition that the vessel on which the worker is employed must fly the flag of that Member State, and (b) any clause in the legislation of that Member State which provides that an employment contract is void to the extent to which it prevents the conflict rule laid down in that provision from taking full effect.
Όταν μια απόφαση ληφθείσα βάσει του άρθρου 38 της Συμβάσεως των Βρυξελλών και η "απόφαση επί της προσφυγής" περιλαμβάνονται στην ίδια απόφανση του δικαστηρίου, η αίτηση αναιρέσεως είναι δυνατόν να ασκηθεί κατά της δικαστικής αυτής αποφάνσεως μόνο καθόσον η απόφανση αυτή αφορά τη δεύτερη απόφαση.
Article 14(2)(c) of Regulation No. 1408/71 would be deprived of all useful effect if the condition of membership relating to the flag flown by the vessel, imposed by the legislation of the Member State in whose territory the undertaking paying the worker had its registered office, was enforceable against the persons covered by Article 14(2)(c).
Τα ερωτήματα αυτά ανέκυψαν στο πλαίσιο διαφοράς μεταξύ του Fonds voor Arbeidsongevallen (ταμείο εργατικών ατυχημάτων), βελγικού οργανισμού δημοσίου δικαίου, αποστολή του οποίου είναι η αποκατάσταση των ζημιών που προκύπτουν από τα εργατικό ατυχήματα, και της Madeleine De Paep, σχετικά με την άρνηση του Fonds να χορηγήσει στην De Paep ισόβια σύνταξη σε αποκατάσταση της ζημίας λόγω του θανάτου του υιού της Piet Ackx.
Article 14(2)(c) of Regulation No. 1408/71, as in force in February 1980, must be interpreted as having the effect or rendering Inoperative vis-a-vis the persons to which it refers or to those claiming under them (a) a clause in the applicable legislation of a Member State under which admission to the social security scheme provided for is made conditional upon the vessel on board which the worker is employed flying the flag of that Member State and (b) any clause in the legislation of that Member State providing that a contract of employment is to be void in so far as it prevents the rule of conflict laid down in that provision from producing its full effects."
Από τη δικογραφία προκύπτει ότι κατά τον χρόνο του ατυχήματος ο Plet Ackx εργαζόταν, με τον Germain Ackx, σύζυγο της De Paep, επί του πλοίου "Hosanna".
"In the light of the foregoing considerations, I suggest that the Court reply as follows to the questions submitted by the Hof van Cassatie, Belgium:
Η De Paep και ο σύζυγος της Germain Ackx κατείχαν το ήμισυ των μετοχών της εταιρίας αυτής.
Determination of the legislation applicable to the employment relationship between a worker and the undertaking paying him falls outside the scope of Regulation No. 1408/71;
Πάντως, διερωτήθηκε αν, για την εφαρμογή των άρθρων 13, παράγραφος 2, στοιχείο β, και 14, παράγραφος 2, στοιχείο γ, του κανονισμού 1408/71, το κύρος συμβάσεως
(Preliminary ruling (Freedom to provide services - Prohibition on the distribution of information on clinics carrying out voluntary terminations of pregnancy in
28 εργασίας ή η ύπαρξη σχέσεως εργασίας μεταξύ ενός ναυτικού και της επιχειρήσεως που τον αμείβει πρέπει να εκτιμάται κατά τη νομοθεσία της χώρας εντός της οποίας η επιχείρηση αυτή έχει την έδρα της.
- 28 other Member States) (Full Court)
Πάντως, διερωτήθηκε κατά πόσον έπρεπε να εφαρμοστεί ο κανονισμός 1408/71, δεδομένου ότι ο ενδιαφερόμενος αμειβόταν από επιχείρηση που είχε την έδρα της στο Βέλγιο.
The questions arose in proceedings brought by the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd ("S.P.U.C") against Stephen Grogan and fourteen other officers of students associations in connexion with the distribution in Ireland of specific information relating to the identity and location of clinics in another Member State where medical termination of pregnancy is carried out.
Επί του πρώτου ερωτήματος
Jurisdiction of the Court
Αρκεί να αναφερθεί σχετικά ότι από το άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1, του κανονισμού 1408/71 προκύπτει ότι ο εν λόγω κανονισμός εφαρμόζεται στις νομοθεσίες των κρατών μελών που αφορούν τους διαφόρους κλάδους κοινωνικής ασφαλίσεως.
As far as these proceedings were concerned, the Court stated that if the High Court made the reference to this Court 1n the context of the interlocutory proceedings, it should be observed that the Supreme Court expressly authorized it to vary the injunction granted in the light of the preliminary ruling to be given by the Court of Justice.
Επομένως, τις εν λόγω νομοθεσίες Όψορούν οι κανόνες ιδιωτικού διεθνούς δικαίου που διατυπώνονται στον τίτλο II του κανονισμού, μέρος του οποίου αποτελούν τα άρθρα 13 και 14.
If, on the other hand, the request for a preliminary ruling was made in the context of the main proceedings, the High Court would have to give a decision on the substance of the case. This meant that in either case the court making the reference is called upon to give a decision which could take into account the preliminary ruling.
Επί του δευτέρου ερωτήματος
Consequently, it was entitled to refer questions to the Court under Article 177 of the Treaty and the Court had jurisdiction to entertain them.
(20) Η πιο πάνω ερμηνεία ισχύει, επίσης, για τις διατάξεις της εθνικής νομοθεσίας που αφορούν την ακυρότητα συμβάσεως εργασίας.
In this regard, it was sufficient to observe that the circumstances referred to by S.P.U.C. went to the substance of the national court's questions. Consequently, they were not relevant In determining whether the Court had jurisdiction to rule on the request for a preliminary ruling.
Το Δικαστήριο αποφαίνεται:
In its first question, the national court essentially sought to establish whether medical termination of pregnancy, performed in accordance with the law of the State where it was carried out, constituted a service within the meaning of Article 60 of the EEC Treaty.
Ο v8ViKòc εισαvvελέαc Giuseppe Tesauro ανέπτυΕε TIC nooTÓ08ic του κατά τη συνεδρίαση του έκτου TuñuoTOC Tnc 9nc Ιουλίου 1991.
It was not for the Court to substitute its assessment for that of the legislature in those Member States where the activities in question were practised legally.
Πρότεινε:
Second and third questions
"Υπό το φως των σκέψεων που προηγήθηκαν, προτείνω το Δικαστήριο να απαντήσει στα ερωτήματα που υπέβαλε το Hof van cassatie van België ως εξής:
Having regard to the facts of the case, it was apparent that, in its second and third questions, the national court sought essentially to establish whether it was contrary to Community law for a Member State in which medical termination of pregnancy was forbidden to prohibit students associations from distributing information about the identity and location of clinics in another Member State where medical termination of pregnancy was lawfully carried out and the means of communicating with those clinics, where the clinics in question had no involvement in the distribution of the said information.
0 καθορισμός της νομοθεσίας που εφαρμόζεται στη σχέση εργασίας μεταξύ του εργαζομένου και της επιχειρήσεως που τον αμείβει δεν εμπίπτει στο πεδίο εφαρμογής του κανονισμού 1408/71-
As regards, first, the provisions of Article 59 of the Treaty, which prohibited any restriction on the freedom to supply services, it was apparent from the facts of the case that the link between the activity of the students associations of which Mr Grogan and the other defendants were officers and medical terminations of pregnancies carried out in clinics in another Member State was too tenuous for the prohibition on the distribution of information to be capable of being regarded as a restriction within the meaning of Article 59 of the Treaty.
Grogan κ.λπ. 4.10.1991 (Προδικαστική) "Ελεύθερη κυκλοφορία των υπηρεσιών - Απαγόρευση διαδόσεως πληροφοριών σχετικά με κλινικές που εκτελούν εκτρώσεις σε άλλα κράτη μέλη" (Ολομέλεια)
Secondly, Article 62, by virtue of which the Member States were not to introduce new restrictions on the freedom actually achieved with regard to the provision of services upon entry intor force of the Treaty, could not prohibit restrictions which did not fall within the scope of Article 59.
Με Διάταξη της 5ης Μαρτίου 1990, η οποία περιήλθε στο Δικαστήριο στις 23 Μαΐου 1990, το High Court Dublin υπέβαλε, δυνάμει του άρθρου 177 της Συνθήκης ΕΟΚ, τρία προδικαστικά ερωτήματα ως προς την ερμηνεία του κοινοτικού δικαίου και ιδίως του άρθρου 60 της Συνθήκης ΕΟΚ.
It was important to bear in mind that where national legislation fell within the field of application of Community law the Court, when requested to give a preliminary ruling, must provide the national court with all the elements of interpretation necessary in order to enable it to assess the compatibility of that legislation with the fundamental rights - as laid down in particular in the European Convention on Human Rights - the observance of which the Court ensures. However, the Court had no such jurisdiction with regard to national legislation lying outside the scope of Community law.
Σχετικά με την αρμοδιότητα του Δικαστηρίου
It is not contrary to Community law for a Member State in which medical termination of pregnancy is forbidden to prohibit students associ ati ons from distributing i riformati on about the identity and location of clinics in another Member State where voluntary termination of pregnancy is lawfully carried out and the means of communicating with those clinics, where the clinics in question have no involvement in the distribution of the said information.
Επομένως, και στις δύο περιπτώσεις το αιτούν δικαστήριο καλείται να εκδόσει απόφαση δυνάμενη να λάβει υπόψη την προδικαστική απόφαση.
"I therefore propose that the Court should answer the questions put by the national court in the following terms:
Αφετέρου, δεδομένου ότι η δραστηριότητα παροχής πληροφοριών πραγματοποιήθηκε εξ ολοκλήρου στην
The medical operation, normally performed for remuneration, by which the pregnancy of a woman coming from another Member State
Ιρλανδία και δεν ενδιέφερε κανένα άλλο κράτος μέλος, ήταν ξένη προς τις εν λόγω διατάζεις της Συνθήκης.
31 is terminated in compliance with the law of the Member State in which the operation is carried out is a (cross-border) service within the meaning of Article 60 of the EEC Treaty.
(15) Αρκεί να αναγνωριστεί σχετικά ότι τα περιστατικά που επικαλέστηκε η SPUC αφορούν την ουσία των ερωτημάτων που υπέβαλε το εθνικό δικαστήριο.
The Treaty provisions with regard to the freedom to provide services do not prevent a Member State where the protection of unborn life is recognized in the Constitution and in Its legislation as a fundamental principle from imposing a general prohibition, applying to everyone regardless of their nationality or place of establishment, on the provision of assistance to pregnant women, regardless of their nationality, with a view to the termination of their pregnancy, more specifically through the distribution of information as to the identity and location of and method of communication with clinics located in another Member State where abortions are carried out, even though the services of medical termination of pregnancy and the information relating thereto are provided in accordance with the law in force in that second Member State."
Επί του πρώτου ερωτήματος
The European Parliament is ordered to pay the costs, including the interveners".
(26) Οι πληροφορίες στις οποίες αναφέρονται τα προδικαστικό ερωτήματα δεν παρέχονται για λογαριασμό του επιχειρηματία που είναι εγκατεστημένος σε άλλο κράτος μέλος.
Whilst it is true that the (urgent) measures adopted on the basis of that regulation will have a (temporary) impact on the marketing of those products, the fact remains that, in view of the importance of pursuing a coherent and effective policy for the protection of health, that cannot prevent Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty from constituting the legal basis of such a regulation.
Αντιθέτως, οι πληροφορίες αυτές συνιστούν εκδήλωση της ελευθερίας εκφράσεως και πληροφορήσεως, ανεξάρτητη της οικονομικής δραστηριότητας που ασκείται από τις κλινικές που είναι εγκατεστημένες σε άλλο κράτος μέλος.
In my opinion, it is impossible to accept the arguments put forward by the Parliament to the effect that Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty does not form such a legal basis, because they interpret the policy of health protection referred to in Article 30 et seq. of the EAEC Treaty in an unduly restrictive manner. I propose therefore that the Court dismiss the Parliament's application.
Από αυτό προκύπτει ότι, εν πάση περιπτώσει, η απαγόρευση διαδόσεως πληροφοριών υπό συνθήκες όπως αυτές της διαφοράς της κύριας δίκης δεν μπορεί να θεωρηθεί ως περιορισμός που εμπίπτει στο άρθρο 59 της Συνθήκης.
Costs: Since the Council failed in its plea concerning admissibility, which was also an important factor in the present case, I propose that, pursuant to Article 69(3) of the Rules of Procedure, that the Court order the European Parliament and the Council each to bear their own costs. Since the Parliament failed in its submissions on the substance of the case, it must be ordered to pay the costs incurred by the interveners, which did not submit observations on admissibility and supported the Council as regards the substance."
Αντιθέτως, δεν έχει την αρμοδιότητα αυτή έναντι εθνικής ρυθμίσεως που δεν τοποθετείται στο πλαίσιο του κοινοτικού δικαίου.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 4 August 1989, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that, by imposing the nationality requirements enshrined in Sections 13 and 14 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1988 Act"), the United Kingdom had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7, 52 and 221 of the EEC Treaty.
Η εκτελούμενη από ιατρό διακοπή της κυήσεως, η οποία πραγματοποιείται σύμφωνα με το δίκαιο του κράτους όπου λαμβάνει χώρα, αποτελεί υπηρεσία κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 60 της Συνθήκης ΕΟΚ.
By imposing as conditions for registration of a fishing vessel in its national register the requirement that the legal owners and, adds to
33 με τον οποίο οι ενδιαφερόμενοι μπορούν να έλθουν σε επαφή με τις κλινικές αυτές, εφόσον οι εν λόγω κλινικές ουδόλως έχουν ζητήσει τη διάδοση αυτών των πληροφοριών."
33 not less than 75%, the beneficial owners, where the latter are natural persons, charterers and operators of the vessel must be British nationals or companies incorporated in the United Kingdom and that, in the latter case, no less than 75% of the capital of any such company must be held by British nationalities or by companies fulfilling the same conditions and that 75% of the directors of any such company should be British nationals, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil the obligations incumbent upon it under Articles 7, 52 and 221 of the EEC Treaty.
"Κατά συνέπεια, προτείνω το Δικαστήριο να δώσει τις ακόλουθες απαντήσεις στα προδικαστικό ερωτήματα:
The United Kingdom is ordered to pay the Commission's costs, including those of the proceedings for interim measures, and those of the Kingdom of Spain;
Υπόθ.
Case T-36/89: Nijman ν Commission
"Ραδιενέργεια στα τρόφιμα" (Ολομέλεια)
Staff Case (Non-contractual liability - Obligation to provide information) (Fourth Chamber)
Απορρίπτει την προσφυγή.
Staff Case (Official's individual file - Documents missing) (Fifth Chamber)
Καταδικάζει το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο στα δικαστικά έξοδα, συμπερ ι λαμβανομένων και των εξόδων των παρεμβαινόντων."
Preliminary ruling - Corte suprema di Cassazione - Interpretation of Articles 77 and 79 of Council Regulation No. 1408/71 having regard to national legislation providing family benefits for the spouse of the awardee of a (national) retirement pension.
Ο v8viKòc ε^σαvvελέαc Walter Van Gerven ανέπτυΕε TIC ποοτάσεκ του κατά τη συνεδρίαση Tnc Ολουέλε^ Tnc 26nc Ιουνίου 1991.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 17 September 1991
Πρότεινε:
He concluded:
Δεδομένου ότι το Κοινοβούλιο ηττήθηκε επί της ουσίας, πρέπει να καταδικαστεί στα δικαστικά έξοδα στα οποία υποβλήθηκαν οι παρεμβαίνοντες, οι οποίοι δεν κατέθεσαν παρατηρήσεις επί του ζητήματος του παραδεκτού και υποστήριξαν τα αιτήματα του Συμβουλίου ως προς την ουσία."
Articles 77 and 79 of Council Regulation No. 1408/71 of 14 June 1971, in the version contained in Annex I to Council Regulation No. 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, do not preclude the application, in favour of a pensioner residing in another Member State whose entitlement to a pension was determined by the competent institution in that Member State having regard to insurance periods completed In other Member States, of the provisions of the said State which provide for the pensioner entitlement to receive family benefits for a dependent spouse as well."
Υπόθ. C-246/89 Επιτροπή των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων κ.λπ. κατά Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου Μεγάλης Βρετανίας και Βόρειας Ιρλανδίας κ.λπ.
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Articles 73 and 75 of Regulation No. 1408/71 - Refusal to grant family benefits to pre­retirement workers not residing within national territory.
"Αλιεία - Νηολόγηση πλοίων - Προϋπόθεση ιθαγενείας" (Ολομέλεια)
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 17 September 1991
Το Δικαστήριο αποφασίζει:
"Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court dismiss the application and order the Commission to pay the costs."
Η Ιρλανδία φέρει τα δικό της δικαστικά έξοδα, συμπεριλαμβανομένων και των εξόδων της διαδικασίας λήψεως ασφαλιστικών μέτρων."
Preliminary ruling - Belgian Court of Cassation - Interpretation of Article 48, first paragraph of Article 59, Articles 67 and 106 of the EEC Treaty in relation to national income tax legislation which makes the deductibility of contributions to sickness and invalidity or old age and life assurance subject to the condition that such contributions are paid in the Member State concerned.
0 V8VIKÓC εισαvvελέαc Jean Mischo ανέπτυΕε TIC nopTÓocic του κατά τη συνεδρίαση Tnc 13nc Μαοτίου 1991.
Mr Advocate General Jean Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 17 September 1991.
"Από τις απαντήσεις αυτές προκύπτει ότι η προσφυγή παραβάσεως που άσκησε η Επιτροπή είναι βάσιμη και, επομένως, πρέπει να αναγνωριστεί, στην υπόθεση C-246/89, ότι το Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο παρέβη τις υποχρεώσεις που υπέχει από τα άρθρα 52 και 221 της Συνθήκης ΕΟΚ, επιβάλλοντας τις προϋποθέσεις ιθαγενείας που καθορίζουν τα άρθρα 13 και 14 του Merchant Shipping Act του 1988.
Articles 48 and 59 of the EEC Treaty must be interpreted as precluding tax legislation of a Member State which provides that contributions to sickness and Invalidity insurance or old age and life assurance schemes are not deductible from a worker's taxable income unless they are paid to an insurance undertaking established within the territory of that Member State.
Όσον αφορά την υπόθεση C-246/89, η Κυβέρνηση του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου πρέπει να φέρει όλα τα δικαστικά έξοδα, συμπεριλαμβανομένων αυτών του Βασιλείου της Ισπανίας, το οποίο παρενέβη προς στήριξη των αιτημάτων της Επιτροπής, εξαιρουμένων αυτών της Ιρλανδίας, η οποία παρενέβη προς στήριξη των αιτημάτων του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου."
By making the deductibility of contributions for supplementary insurance in respect of old age or premature death from a worker's taxable income subject to the condition that such contributions must be paid to undertakings established in Belgium or to Belgian establishments of foreign undertakings, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 48 and 59 of the EEC Treaty and Article 7(2) of Regulation No. 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968.
Τ-36/89: Nijman κατά Επιτροπής
The Court of Cassation should therefore not apply those provisions.
Υπαλληλική Εξωσυμβατική ευθύνη - Υποχρέωση προς πληροφόρηση (Τέταρτο τμήμα)
As regards Case C-300/90, I propose that the Court order each of the parties to bear its own costs since in my opinion neither was wholly right or wholly wrong."
Υπόθ. Τ-54/90: Lacroix κατά Επιτροπής
Case C-306/89 Commission of the European Communities ν Hellenic Republic
Υπαλληλική Σύνταξη - Ανά πενταετία έλεγχος των διορθωτικών συντελεστών (Τέταρτο τμήμα)
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to implement Council Directive 82/470/EEC on measures to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services in respect of activities of self-employed persons in certain services incidental to transport and travel agencies (ISIC Group 718) and in storage and warehousing (ISIC Group 720).
Τ-5/90: Marcato κατά Επιτροπής
"I therefore propose that the Court
Υπαλληλική Ατομικός φάκελος υπαλλήλου - Ελλείποντα έγγραφα (Πέμπτο τμήμα)
Find that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the legislative and administrative provisions and rules necessary to comply with Council Directive 82/470/EEC of 29 June 1982 on measures to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services in respect of activities of self-employed
Ενώπιον του Δικαστηρίου
Order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs."
Προδικαστική - Corte suprema di Cassazione - Ερμηνεία των άρθρων 77 και 79 του κανονισμού ΕΟΚ 1408/71 του Συμβουλίου έναντι εθνικής νομοθεσίας που προβλέπει οικογενειακές παροχές για τον σύζυγο του δικαιούχου (εθνικής) συντάξεως.
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose into domestic law Council Directive 80/155/EEC concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to the taking up and pursuit of the activities of midwlves.
0 v8viKòc εισαvvελέoc Walter Van Gerven ανέπτυΕε TIC nooTòacic του κατά τη συνεδρίαση Tnc 17nc ΣεπτευΒοίου 1991.
Mr Advocate General Carl Otto Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991.
"Προτείνω στο προδικαστικό ερώτημα να δοθεί η εξής απάντηση:
"I suggest that the Court hold as follows:
Υπόθ.
Case C-2/90 Commission ν Belgium
Παράβαση κράτους - Άρθρα 73 και 75 του κανονισμού ΕΟΚ 1408/71 - Μη χορήγηση οικογενειακών επιδομάτων στους εργαζομένους που βρίσκονται σε κατάσταση προώρου συνταξιοδοτήσεως και δεν κατοικούν στο εθνικό έδαφος.
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty - Infringement of Council Directives 75/442/EEC on waste and 84/631/EEC on the supervision and control within the European Community of the transfrontier shipment of hazardous waste.
0 γενικός εισαγγελέας Walter Van Gerven ανέπτυξε τις προτάσεις του κατά τη συνεδρίαση της 17ης Σεπτεμβρίου 1991.
Mr Advocate General F. G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991
C-204/90 Η.-Ν. Bachmann κατά Βελγικού Δημοσίου και C-300/90 Επιτροπή των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων κατά Βασιλείου του Βελγίου
Declare that by prohibiting the storage, tipping or dumping in Wal Ioni a of waste from other Member States and, in so far as waste originating in other Member States is concerned, from Belgian regions other than Wallonia, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 84/631/EEC and Article 30 of the EEC Treaty;
TIC noaTooc.ic του κατά τη
Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs."
0 V8VIKÒC εισαννελέικ; Jean Mischo ανέπτυΕε συνεδρίαση Tnc 17nc ΣεπτευΒοίου 1991.
Mr Advocate General Carl Otto Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991