natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2) Σε περίπτωση καταφατικής απάντησης στο ταξης αυτής με την αιτιολογία ότι είχε εργασθεί πρώτο ερώτημα: το άρθρο 1 1 9 σε συνδυα­ με καθεστώς μερικής απασχόλησης.
By way of introduction, the Court recalled that ac­cording to its established case-law Article 4(1 ) of the Directive prohibited less favourable treatment of a social group when it turned out that group was com­posed of a far higher number of persons of one or other sex, unless the measure in question was 'justified by objective factors unrelated to any discrimination on grounds of sex (Case 33/89 — Kowalska).
σύμβαση, δικαίωμα αποζημίωσης (ανάλογης
The Court also recalled that it had declared, in particu­lar, that a benefit system which provided for sup-
Τα προαναφερθέν­ προσκρούει στην αρχή της δικαιοπρακτικής τα δεν ισχύουν αν η διαφορετική μεταχείριση ελευθερίας των μερών μιας συλλογικής των δύο αυτών κατηγοριών εργαζομένων οφείλε­ σύμβασης εργασίας; ται σε παράγοντες αντικειμενικούς και ξένους προς οποιαδήποτε διάκριση λόγω φύλου (βλέπε υπόθεση 1 70/84, Bilka). Αρμόδια να προβούν
Handbook on equal treatment for men and women in the European Community plements which were not related to sex of those eli gible but would take into account their matrimonial and family status, the result of which was that an appreciably lower percentage of women than men were able to benefit from those supplements would be contrary to Article 4(1 ), if this system of benefits could not be justified by reasons excluding discri mination on grounds of sex (Case 30/85 — Teuling).
Επιπλέον, το εργοδότη στον εργαζόμενο λόγω της εργασίας
The Court, however, was of the opinion that such consideration could not be re garded as forming the basis of objective criteria un related to any discrimination on grounds of sex.
Ως εκ τούτου, το Δι­
The Commission's application is dismissed;
κριση εις βάρος των γυναικών εργαζομένων, σε σχέση με τους άνδρες, στις περιπτώσεις κατά τις
Moreover, the Court noted that the Belgian system, as it stood, tended to give the replace ment income programme instituted in Belgium the character of a guaranteed minimum income for fami lies.
21 Σε περίπτωση έμμεσης διάκρισης, που εισά­ οποίες το ποσοστό των μερικώς απασχολουμένων γεται με διάταξη συλλογικής σύμβασης, τα
In connection with this, the EG recognized the reasonable discretion the Member States had, in that stage of Community law, as far as social security measures and concrete means to put them into effect were concerned. This approach may give rise to implications for the effective application of the objective justification test as laid down in Case 170/84 — Bilka.
Η παρούσα υπόθεση αποτελεί επιβεβαίωση πολλών άλλων προηγουμένων αποφάσεων του
The claimants appealed against the decisions of the Sociale Verzekeringsbank to the Raad van Beroep.
Στην υπόθεση 262/88, Barber, το ΔΕΚ είχε αποφανθεί επίσης ότι οι προσωρινές αποζημι­ ώσεις που καταβάλλονται στους εργαζόμενους κατά τη διακοπή της σχέσης εργασίας εμπίπτουν στο πεδίο εφαρμογής του άρθρου 1 1 9 (βλέπε υπόθεση 1 2/81, Garland).
By three orders of 30 January and 1 5 February 1990, the Raad van Beroep of 's-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands) referred the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty:
Επιπλέον, κρίνοντας ότι οι συλλογικές συμβάσεις εμπίπτουν στο πεδίο εφαρμογής της προαναφερθείσας διάταξης, το Δι­ καστήριο επιβεβαίωσε την υπόθεση 43/7 5, De­ frenne II.
The Dutch legislation Algemene Ouderdomswet) ('AOW') instituted for the benefit of Dutch residents as well as non-residents over the age of 65, who had been taxed on income earned from employment in the Netherlands, a general oldage pension scheme under which rights were calculated on the basis of past periods of insurance.
Για μια ακόμη φορά το ΔΕΚ, προκειμένου να αντιμετωπίσει το ζήτημα της έμμεσης διά­ κρισης, προέβη στον έλεγχο τον οποίο είχε καθιε­ ρώσει επί της υπόθεσης 1 70/84, Bilka.
Under this scheme, appli­cable until an amendment to the law came into effect on 1 April 1985, a married women, resident in the Netherlands, whose spouse, also a Dutch resident, was not insured under the AOW because he was pursu­ing an occupation abroad and was insured under the scheme there, was herself excluded from the scheme during the corresponding period.
Επίσης, στην παρούσα υπόθεση που αφορά την ισότητα αμοιβών, το ΔΕΚ εφάρμοσε, στο σύνολο της, την απόφαση επί της υπόθεσης 102/88, Ruzius-
On the other hand, a married man, resident in the Netherlands, whose wife was not insured under the scheme re­mained eligible under the Dutch pension scheme. The beneficiary of a pension whose dependent spouse
Wilbrmk, που είχε ως αντικείμενο θέματα κοινω­ νικής ασφάλισης.
Summary based on the English version of this judgment pub­lished in 11992] IRLR 38.
FNV κρίνοντας ότι το πλέον ευνοϊκό καθεστώς εφαρμόζεται όχι μόνο σε περίπτωση (έμμεσης) διάκρισης που εισάγεται από σύστημα κοινωνικής ασφάλισης, αλλά και όταν το καθεστώς διά­ κρισης δημιουργείται από συλλογική σύμβαση.
(1) Is the fact that a national provision which ex­cluded only married women from insurance under the AOW continues to be effective after 22 December 1984, in the sense that after that date it continues to be the case that the pension received by these women may be reduced be­cause they have failed to fulfil a requirement for cover which need not be fulfilled by men, com-
Α. FOSTER και λοιπές κατά μει της βρετανικής νομοθεσίας (60ό έτος για τις
Handbook on equal treatment for men and women in the European Community patible with Article 4(1) (and/or Article 5) of Dir ective 79/7/EEC?
Παραπομπή:
In Case C-88/90:
Ίση μεταχείριση μεταξύ ανδρών και γματικών περιστατικών βρετανική νομοθεσία, δια­ γυναικών εργαζομένων — Άμεσο αποτέλεσμα φωνούσαν ως προς το αν μπορεί να γίνει οδηγίας έναντι κρατικοποιημένης επιχείρισης επίκληση του άρθρου 5, παράγραφος 1, της
Such a question might, specifically, concern a directive which had not been implemented by the national authorities within the time prescribed, which was obligatory on Member States and whose precise and unconditional provisions might, according to the case-law of the Court, be applied directly by a national court.
( Άρθρο 5, παράγραφος 1, της οδηγίας του οδηγίας, κατά της BGC.
Conse quently, said the Court, the recognized right of a party to rely, under certain conditions, before a national court, on a directive for which the period of implementation had elapsed could not exclude the power of the national judge to consider that direc tive, even if the party had not relied on it.
Η BGC ιδιωτικοποιήθηκε δυνάμει του Gas ρίου 1976, περί της εφαρμογής της αρχής της
The Court took the view that the second and third questions of Case C-88/90 raised the same problems.
Οι Foster, Fulford-Brown, Morgan, Roby, Sallo- πολιτική απόλυσης λόγω συνταξιοδότησης που way και Sullivan συνταξιοδοτήθηκαν αναγκαστικά εφάρμοζε η BGC ήταν αντίθετη προς την οδηγία; σε διαφορετικές ημερομηνίες μεταξύ της 27ης
In view of this, the Court concluded that the national court should not extend the scope of Directive 79/7 with regard to the persons covered on the grounds that the parties were covered by a national scheme, such as the AOW, to which the Directive did apply by reason of another provision thereof (Article 3) relat ing to its scope ratione materiae.
Δεκεμβρίου 1 985 και της 22ας Ιουλίου 1986, με τη συμπλήρωση του 60ού έτους της ηλικίας
(1) In proceedings before a national court, can a party rely on Article 4(1 ) (and/or Article 5) of Directive 79/7/EEC if he suffers the effects of a dis criminatory national provision regarding his spouse, who is not a party to the said proceedings?
Η απόφαση του ΔΕΚ τους.
The judgment of the ECJ
Οι συνταξιοδοτήσεις αυτές εντάσσονταν στη γενικώς ακολουθούμενη από την BGC πολιτική,
As far as question 1 of Case C-88/90 was con cerned, the Court observed that it had already recog nized that Article 177 of the EEC Treaty conferred
Καταρχάς και σύμφωνα με την πάγια νομολογία η οποία συνίστατο στη συνταξιοδότηση των του, το Δικαστήριο διευκρίνισε ότι, στις περι-
Concerning the question referred to in Case C-89/90, the Court mentioned at the outset that the right to rely on the provisions of Directive 79/7 was not restricted to persons who fell within the scope of the Directive, to the extent that it could not be ruled out that others might have a direct interest in seeing the principle of non-discrimination respected on behalf of the persons protected. The Court added that if,
76/207/ΕΟΚ δυναμωνόταν αν οι πολίτες εμποδίζονταν να την του Συμβουλίου, της 9ης Φεβρουαρίου
As to the present case, the Court stated that a party suffering the effect of a dis criminatory national provision might only be permit ted to rely on Directive 79/7 on the basis that his wife, who was the victim of the discrimination, fell within the scope of that Directive herself.
19 76, επικαλεσθούν ενώπιον των δικαστηρίων και αν τα περί της εφαρμογής της αρχής της ίσης μετα­ εθνικά δικαστήρια εμποδίζονταν να τη λάβουν χείρισης ανδρών και γυναικών, όσον αφορά υπόψη ως στοιχείο του κοινοτικού δικαίου.
Directive 79/7 must be interpreted as not allow ing Member States to retain in force, after ex piry of the period for implementation laid down in Article 8, the effects of earlier national legisla tion which excluded married women in certain cir cumstances from oldage insurance cover.
Σχόλια τα τα οποία οι ιδιώτες είναι σε θέση να προβάλουν έναντι του κράτους.
Moreover, according to its ruling in Case 80/87 — Dik, a Member State could not, after 23 December 1984, continue inequality of treat ment on the grounds that the conditions that needed to be fulfilled before a right to benefit would rise had been established before that date.
Von Colson, και 79/83, Harz και, δεύτερον, μέσω τος ενεργεί.
In this case, the EG confirmed the strict interpreta tion of the personal scope of Directive 79/7 on Social Security matters, which was adopted in Joined Cases 48, 106, and 107/88 — Achterberg-te Riele.
Και στις δύο περιπτώσεις θα πρέπει της παρούσας απόφασης.
It emphasized that the Directive's personal scope is only defined by its Article 2 and may not be extended by virtue of Article 3 thereof.
Κατά την εκδίκαση της να αποκλεισθεί το ενδεχόμενο να μπορεί το κράτος παρούσας υπόθεσης, το ΔΕΚ προέβη μάλλον σε να επωφεληθεί από τη μη συμμόρφωση του προς ευρεία ερμηνεία της έννοιας «κράτος».
However, the EG re phrased its ruling in Achterberg-te Riele by positively stating that the Directive applied to the non-working population, those seeking employment, as well as those whose employment had been interrupted by one of the risks mentioned in Article 3 of this Directive.
Κατά το κοινοτικό δίκαιο.
The importance of it became clear in Case C-31/90 —Johnson, ruled on the same day.
Βάσει των σκέψεων αυτών, το συνέπεια, αυξήθηκαν οι πιθανότητες επιτυχούς
Furthermore, the EG held that the right to rely on the Directive is not absolutely restricted to those who fall within its per sonal scope.
(κάθετο) άμεσο αποτέλεσμα εναντίον κράτους.
Others, with a direct interest in seeing the non-discriminatory principle laid down in Article 4 respected, may rely on it as well, under certain (national) conditions.
Ήδη από την υπόθεση 1 9/81, Burton συνάγετο βείς διατάξεις των οδηγιών (όπως αυτή του άρθρου ότι το άρθρο 5 της οδηγίας 76/207 ήταν επαρκώς
As to the temporal scope, the EG confirmed that its rulings in Cases 384/85 —Borrie Clarke and 80/87 — Dik, not only apply to transitional provisions, but to all cases where the effects of a previous discriminatory provision might effect entitle ment accrued after 23 December 1984.
5, παράγραφος 1, της οδηγίας 76/207) έναντι ακριβές και απαλλαγμένο αιρέσεων.
Any person who was excluded from social insurance on discrimina tory grounds before the said date has to be treated as if he/she was insured.
έλεγχο του κράτους ή που έχουν εξαιρετικές εξου­ σίες σε σχέση με εκείνες που απορρέουν από τους συνήθεις κανόνες που εφαρμόζονται στις σχέ­ σεις μεταξύ ιδιωτών.
Article 2 of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementa tion of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as referring to the scope ratione personae of that Directive, the content of which cannot vary according to the scope ratione mater iae, under Article 3 thereof.
Εγχειρίδιο για την ίση μεταχείριση ανδρών και γυναικών στην Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα να της καταβάλει κατά τη διάρκεια της άδειας
Handbook on equal treatment for men and women in the European Community ment allowance as from 29 November 1984, with­out having to show that they fulfilled the new conditions.
Υπόθεση C1 77/88 μητρότητας αυτής.
Case C-31/90 ELSIE RITA JOHNSON ν CHIEF ADJUDICATION OFFICER.
(VJV-CENTRUM) PLUS απώλεια προσωπικού.
Date of judgment: 11 July 1991.
Ημερομηνία έκδοσης της απόφασης: που οφείλονται σε περίπτωση ασθενείας), η διε­
On 17 August 1987, Mrs Johnson made a claim through a citizens' advice bureau for a severe disable­ment allowance based on the aforesaid regulation.
8 Νοεμβρίου 1990 ύθυνση του Ρίείοίίοηαε μπορούσε να αρνηθεί, εν όλω ή εν μέρει, την επιστροφή των εν λόγω απο­
The Adjudication Officer rejected that claim by a deci­sion dated 13 November 1987 and her appeal was dismissed by the Sutton Social Security Appeal Tribunal by a decision of 24 October 1988.
Συλλογή 1990, μέρος Ι, σ.
She then ap­pealed to the Social Security Commissioners.
Αντικείμενο: των καθηκόντων του εντός έξι μηνών μετά την
Subject-matter: Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security
76/207/ΕΟΚ, της 9ης Φεβρουαρίου 1 976) τητας εντός της περιόδου αυτής.
(Articles 2 and 4 of EEC Council Directive 79/7 of 19 December 1978).
Στις 1 5 Ιουνίου πληρο­ μένης να προβλεφθεί».
By a decision of 25 January 1990, the Social Security Commissioners referred four questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 1 77 of the EEC Treaty:
φόρησε την επιτροπή που είχε αναλάβει την εξέ­ ταση των υποψηφιοτήτων ότι ήταν έγκυος τριών
(1 ) Is Article 2 of Directive 79/7/EEC to be interpret­ed as including within its personal scope a woman (or man) who was a worker but who left employment for the purposes of child care and who was later prevented from returning to em­ployment by illness?
Επειδή το Arrondissementsrechtbank του Χάρ­ μηνών. Η επιτροπή, εντούτοις, την πρότεινε στη λεμ και το Gerechtshof του Άμστερνταμ απέρριψαν διεύθυνση του VJV ως την καταλληλότερη υπο­ διαδοχικά την προσφυγή και την έφεση της Dek­ ψήφια για την άσκηση των εν λόγω καθηκόντων.
(2) In particular, is such a woman (or man) to be re­garded as included within the personal scope of the Directive if she would be working or seeking employment but for illness, or is it necessary in all cases for a person who claims to be within the personal scope of the Directive to have left em­ployment in the first place not because of child care but because of the materialization of one of the risks referred to in Article 3?
ker, με τις οποίες επιδίωκε να υποχρεωθεί το VJV
Mrs Johnson ceased working in about 1970 to look after her daughter, who was then aged six and with whom she lived alone.
VJV γνωστοποίησε στην Dekker ότι δεν θα προσ­ κέρδους, αυτή άσκησε αναίρεση ενώπιον του Hoge λαμβανόταν.
In 1980, she wished to re­sume working but was unable to do so because of a back condition.
To VJV διευκρίνιζε ότι, αν προσλάμ­
In 1981, by reason of her incapacity for work she was awarded a non-contributory invali­dity pension pursuant to Section 36(2) of the Social Security Act 1975 which was then in force.
βανε την ενδιαφερόμενη, ο ασφαλιστής του, το
However, payment of that pension was stopped when Mrs Johnson began to cohabit with her present partner on the ground that she could not establish that she ful­filled the additional condition imposed by Section 36(2) on cohabiting women, namely that she should be incapable of performing normal household duties.
Risicofonds Sociale Voorzieningen Bijzonder On­ derwijs (ταμείο κάλυψης των κινδύνων όσον
By Section 11 of the Health and Social Secur­ity Act 1984, the non-contributory invalidity pension was abolished as from 20 November 1984, and the new benefit, the severe disablement allowance, which was open to claimants of both sexes on the same conditions, was introduced with effect from 29 November 1984.
Ερωτήματα που υποβλήθηκαν στο ΔΕΚ αφορά κοινωνικές παροχές ειδικής εκπαίδευσης, στο εξής: Risicofonds), δεν θα του απέδιδε τις
However, Regulation 20(1) of the Social Security (Severe Disablement Allowance) Regula­tions 1984, allowed persons who could have claimed the old non-contributory invalidity pension to benefit automatically from the new severe disable­
Με απόφαση της 24ης Ιουνίου 1988, το Hoge ημερήσιες αποζημιώσεις που θα ήταν υποχρεωμένο
(3) Is it material for the consideration of the posi­tion of such a woman in relation to Article 2 of the Directive to determine whether or not she has sought employment in the period between the end of her child care responsibilities and the onset of the illness that now prevents her from working?
Νομολογία του Δικαστηρίου των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων τα ακόλουθα προδικαστικά ερωτήματα σύμφωνα τις αναφερόμενες στο άρθρο 2, παράγρα­ με το άρθρο 1 77 της Συνθήκης ΕΟΚ: φοι 2 έως 4, περιπτώσεις;
(i) a Member State had provided an invalidity benefit (such as the non-contributory invalidity benefit considered in Clarke) (benefit 'A') that was subject to a provision preventing married or cohabiting women qualifying for it unless they met an additional test not ap plied to any man;
1 ) Παραβιάζει, άμεσα ή έμμεσα, την αρχή της
(ii) benefit 'A' has been abolished and replaced by benefit 'B';
Η απόφαση του ΔΕΚ τητας λόγω εγκυμοσύνης και τοκετού προς το κώλυμα άσκησης δραστηριότητας λόγω
The judgment of the ECJ who had given up his or her occupational activity in order to attend to the upbringing of his or her children did not fall within the scope of the Directive.
Απαντώντας στο πρώτο ερώτημα, το Δικαστήριο ασθενείας; παρατήρησε ότι η άρνηση πρόσληψης λόγω εγκυμοσύνης δεν μπορεί να αντιταχθεί παρά
Furthermore, the Court pointed out that the protection guaranteed by Directive 79/7 to persons who had given up their occupational activity in order to attend to the upbringing of their children was afforded only to those persons in that ca tegory who suffered incapacity for work during a period in which they were seeking employment.
2) Πρέπει να δοθεί διαφορετική απάντηση στο μόνο σε γυναίκες και συνιστά, επομένως, άμεση πρώτο ερώτημα, αν υποτεθεί ότι δεν διάκριση βασιζόμενη στο φύλο.
As far as the social protection of mothers remaining at home was concerned, it followed from Article 7(1 )(b) of the Directive that the acquisition of entitle ment to benefits following periods of interruption of employment due to the upbringing of children was still a matter for the Member States to regulate.
Η άρνηση υπήρχαν άρρενες υποψήφιοι; πρόσληψης που οφείλεται στις οικονομικές συνέ­ πειες μιας απουσίας λόγω εγκυμοσύνης πρέπει
In those circumstances, concluded the Court, it was for the Community legislature to take such measures as it considered appropriate to remove the discrimination which still existed in this regard in some bodies of national legislation.
3) Συμβιβάζεται προς τα άρθρα 2 και 3, να αντιμετωπισθεί ως βασιζόμενη κατ' ουσία στο α) όταν αποδεικνύεται ότι υπήρξε παρα­ γεγονός της εγκυμοσύνης.
The questions referred to the Court raised two dis tinct issues: first, the determination of the personal scope of Directive 79/7/EEC (first, second and third questions) and, secondly, the determination of the meaning of the principle of equal treatment referred to in Article 4 of the same Directive with regard to the conditions for obtaining a social security benefit (fourth question).
αυτής της αρχής, να συντρέχει επίσης
Therefore, a person
« 1 ) Ο εργοδότης παραβιάζει άμεσα την αρχή της
Handbook on equal treatment for men and women in the European Community
Σχόλια ίσης μεταχείρισης που διατυπώνεται στα άρθρα 2, παράγραφος
Comments vious submission of a claim for a different benefit which entailed a condition discriminating against fe male workers, should be regarded as incompatible with Article 4(1 ) of Directive 79/7.
1, και 3, παράγραφος
In answer to the questions submitted to it, the Court ruled that:
Η παρούσα υπόθεση αφορούσε την άρνηση της οδηγίας του Συμβουλίου
It is for the national court to determine that the person relying on Directive 79/7/EEC was actually seeking employment at the time when one of the risks specified in Article 3(1 )(a) of the Directive materialized.
76/207/ΕΟΚ, πρόσληψης γυναίκας λόγω της εγκυμοσύνης. Η της 9ης Φεβρουαρίου
Since 23 December 1 984, it has been possible to rely on Article 4 of Directive 79/7/EEC in order to have set aside national legislation which makes entitlement to a benefit subject to the previous submission of a claim in respect of a different benefit which has since been abolished and which entailed a condition discriminating against female workers.
1976, περί της εφαρ­ δυσκολία σχετικά με το ζήτημα αν αυτή η συμπε­ μογής της αρχής της ίσης μεταχείρισης ριφορά συνεπαγόταν ή όχι δυσμενή διάκριση, με
In the absence of appropriate mea sures for implementing Article 4 of Directive 79/7/EEC, women placed at a disadvantage by the maintenance of the discrimination are entitled to be treated in the same manner and to have the same rules applied to them as men who are in the same situation, since, where the Directive has not been implemented correctly, those rules remain the only valid point of reference.
Βλέπε επίσης την υπόθεση C-179/88, Hertz.
Case-law of the European Court of Justice
(HERTZ κατά ALDI)
Date of judgment: 25 July 1991.
Επειδή το Sø- og Handelsret (Ναυτικό και Εμπορι­
character and that Suma would return to the initial situation as soon as its economic difficulties had disap­peared.
Hertz κατά της εν λόγω απόλυσης, η Hertz άσκησε έφεση κατά της απόφασης αυτής ενώπιον
In order to give equal opportunities to fe­male employees, the available jobs were offered to both men and women, after the majority of the women had voted in favour of the new system of shift­work.
Παραπομπή: του Højesteret.
Reference: Not yet reported."
Αντικείμενο: υπαλλήλων γραφείου της Δανίας) άσκησε παρέμ­
Subject-matter: Equal treatment for men and women — Legislation prohibiting night work for women (Article 5 of EEC Council Directive 76/207 of 9 February 1976).
Προϋποθέσεις απόλυσης — Απουσία οφειλό­ rening (Συνομοσπονδία των δανών εργοδοτών) μενη σε ασθένεια της οποίας αρχική αιτία εί­ υπέρ της Aldi Marked.
In the proceedings before the tribunal de police, Mr Stoeckel maintained that Article L213­1 of the Code du Travail contravened Article 5 of Directive 76/207 and the ruling in Case 312/86 — Commission ν France, whereby the Court had held that the French Repub­lic had failed to fulfil its obligations regarding the adoption of all measures mentioned therein, which were needed for removing the inequalities prohibited under that Directive.
Συνθήκης ΕΟΚ:
Question referred to the ECJ
1 ) Καλύπτουν οι διατάξεις του άρθρου 5, παρά­ απασχόληση.
On 28 October 1988, Mr Stoeckel, director of Suma SA in France, was charged with having employed 77 women on night­work, contrary to Article L213­1 of the French Code du Travail.
ρισης ανδρών και γυναικών, όσον αφορά την πρόσβαση σε απασχόληση, την επαγγελματική
By a judgment of 4 October 1989, the Tribunal de Police, lllkirch (France), referred a question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the Treaty:
1 984 και Ιουνίου 1 985, έλαβε εκ νέου αναρ­
(1 ) Is Article 5 of Directive 76/207 precise to impose on a Member State an obligation not to lay down in its legislation the principle that night work by women is prohibited, as in Article L213­1 of the French Code du Travail?
2) Σε περίπτωση καταφατικής απάντησης, ρωτική άδεια επί 1 00 εργάσιμες ημέρες.
The said provision prohibited the employment of women at night, in factories, workshops and the like.
1, και του άρθρου 2, παράγραφος
Based on the assumption that this number could be reduced by creating a system of shift­work, thus en­abling a continuous production, day and night, Suma had entered into negotiations with the trade un­ions.