natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
112 της 28ης Φεβρουα­ρίου 1980 που αφορά τα έντυπα που απαιτούνται για την εφαρμογή των κανονισμών αριθ.
4194 — The concept of overlapping benefits of the same kind covers, for example, cases of overlapping invalidity pensions due under the legislation of two Member States.
γ) ότι το έντυπο που προορίζεται για ένα φυσικό ή νομικό πρόσωπο (εργαζόμενοι, εργοδότες, γραφεία εργασίας, εκπαιδευτικά ιδρύματα κλπ.) που πρέπει να συμπληρώνει τις ενδείξεις.
'Bearing in mind the aims of the Treaty, Article 12 of Regula­tion (EEC) No 1408/71 (rule to prevent different benefits in kind from overlapping) may not be construed as applying to the provisions of the national legislation of a Member State which, forthe purpose of granting unemployment benefit the amount of which depends upon a claimant's fitness for work, do not take account of the actual physical condition of the worker on the date on which he becomes unemployed but take as evidence that a migrant worker is not fit for work the fact that he has previously been granted an invalidity pension in another Member State pursuant to rules of Community law and on the basis of information provided by the first Member State.'
Το ίδρυμα εκδίδει το αντίγραφο που προορίζεται για τον εργαζόμενο (ή άλλα φυσικά ή νομικά πρόσωπα) στη γλώσσα του τελευταίου.
4195 — The concept of overlapping benefits of different kinds may for instance cover cases of overlap between an invalidity benefit due under the legislation of one Member State and an occupational disease allowance due underthe legislation of another Member State.
(Αυτό αφορά τα έντυπα 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 112, 118, 118 παράρτημα, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 201, 211, 212, 301, 302, 303, 401, 402, 402 παράρτημα, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407).
4203 — As stated above (see 4190), application of the over­lapping clauses has been the subject of numerous judg­ments of the Court of Justice.
Ο πρόεδρος της Διοικητικής Επιτροπής
A worker may not therefore be refused unemployment bene­fit in a Member State solely on the ground that he is in receipt, in another Member State, of an invalidity pension determined in accordance with Community rules.
ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΙΣ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΗΡΙΟΥ του
COMPENDIUM OF COMMUNITY PROVISIONS ON SOCIAL SECURITY
Απόφαση 1983 αν όλες οι προϋποθέσεις χορήγησης των παροχών αυτών συμπληρώνονται κατά την έννοια της νομοθε­σίας αυτού του άλλου κράτους μέλους.
If a pension which is received solely by virtue of national legislation also overlaps with a benefit of a different kind of another Member State should the application of a nati­onal provision against overlapping benefits be restricted in such a way that where the application of the national legislation is less favourable than that of the rules con­tained in Article 46 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 that Article must be applied?
στην υπόθεση 150/82 (αίτηση προδικαστικής απόφασης του Social Security Commissioner): L. Coppola/Insurance Officer
On account of its recipient and its purpose, such a benefit has some similarity to oldage benefits: it is intended to gua­rantee means of subsistence for persons that have reached a certain age.
Η δεύτερη φράση του άρθρου 10, παράγραφος 1, πρέπει να ερμηνεύεται προς την κατεύθυνση ότι εφαρμόζεται σε διαζευγμένο σύζυγο.»
Must Article 107 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 be cons­trued to mean that the method for converting currencies laid down by that Article also applies to the conversion pursuant to a national provision against overlapping be­nefits which is saved by Article 12 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of benefits of another Member State?
Coppola και του Insurance Officer, πάνω στην ερμηνεία των άρθρων 13, 18 και 40, παράγραφος 3, και 46, παράγραφος 3, του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ. 1408/71 του Συμβουλίου, το Δικαστήριο εξέδω­σε απόφαση της οποίας το διατακτικό είναι το ακόλουθο:
1. (a) In cases where one social security benefit overlaps with another, may the legislative provisions of a Mem­ber State (paragraph 75 of the Reichsknappschafts­gesetz [Law of the Reich on Insurance Fund for Min­ers] be invoked (See the first sentence of Article 12 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 even though:
Για παροχές ασθένειας δυνάμει του άρθρου 13, παράγραφος 2, εδάφιο α), του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) 1408/71 του Συμβουλίου, της 14ης Ιουνίου 1971 εφαρ­μοστέα είναι μόνο η νομοθεσία του κράτους μέλους στο έδαφος του οποίου απασχολείται ή έχει απασχο­ληθεί ο εργαζόμενος τελευταία.
Benefits acquired under the legislation of two Member States, the purpose of which is to provide means of sub­sistence for an aged person deprived of the income of his deceased spouse, the amounts of which are determined on the basis of the insurance and social security contri­butions of that spouse, are benefits of the same kind.
Το ή τα αρμόδια ιδρύματα του κράτους μέλους αυτού είναι αρμόδια για να προβούν στο συνυπολογισμό των περιόδων ασφάλισης σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 18 του κανονισμού.
(ii) a proportion of the benefit to be brought into account (see Article 57 (3) (c) of the Regulation) is borne by an insurance Institution in the State whose legislation has conferred the benefit to be reduced?
1408/71 του Συμβουλίου, το Δικαστήριο εξέδωσε απόφαση της οποίας το διατακτικό είναι το εξής:
Where the worker receives a pension under the national legislation alone, the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 do not prevent the application to him of only that national legislation in its entirety, including the national rules against overlapping benefits.
«Το άρθρο 40, παράγραφος 4, του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
If, however, the appli­cation ofthat national legislation provesto be less favour­able to the worker than application of the conditions laid down in Article 46 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, the provisions of that Article must be applied.
1408/71, μπορούν, ενδεχο­μένως, να μειώνονται έγκυρα με εφαρμογή του άρθρου 46, παράγραφος 3, του ίδιου κανονισμού.»
When payments of the same kind have been granted and paid in different Member States on the basis of corre­sponding national rules, without any reference to the pro­visions of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, it is inappropriate to apply the method of currency conversion indicated in Article 107 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72.'
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου της 5ης Μαΐου 1983
In its judgment of 15 September 1983, the Court of Justice ruled: does subparagraph 1 of Article 10 (2), thus supplemented, constitute a rule against overlapping benefits within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71?
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου της 3ης 1983 στην υπόθεση 149/82 (προδικαστικό αίτημα του Social Security Commissioner): S.
The first sentence of Article 12 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 must be construed as excluding the reduction or su­spension of a benefit acquired solely under the legislation of one Member State even if the benefits to be taken into ac­count for the purpose of the reduction, which were acquired under the legislation of another Member State, were calcu­lated in application of Article 57 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/ 71 and the competent institution of the first Member State contributes to the cost of those benefits upon the terms set out in Article 57 (3) (c).'
Robards/lnsurance Officer στην υπόθεση 238/81 (αίτημα για προδικαστική απόφαση του Raad van Beroep της Utrecht): Raad van Arbeit της Haye/κα van der Bund-Craig
A national provision which reduces the additional years of notional employment from which a worker may benefit, on the basis of the number of years in respect of which the wor­ker may claim a pension in another Member State, consti­tutes a provision for reduction of benefit within the meaning of Article 12 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 (on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community) which, by virtue of the last sentence of Article 12 (2), is not to be applied when the amount of the pension is calculated under Article 46 (1) ofthat Regulation.
(Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: ολλανδικά).
4204­3 — In Case 117/84 (Office national des pensions pour travailleurs salariés ν Ruzzu) the Court of Justice gave a judgment, the operative part of which was the same.
Δημοσίευση του προδικαστικού ερωτήματος: ΕΕ C 154 της 18. 7. 1982.
The Cour du Travail [Labour Court], Liège, made reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the following questions:
Δημοσίευση του προδικαστικού ερωτήματος: ΕΕ C 245 της 25. 9. 1981.
Title III: Special provisions relating to the different categories of benefits
Στην υπόθεση 149/82 που είχε σαν αντικείμενο ερώτημα που τέθηκε στο Δικαστήριο, με εφαρμογή του άρθρου 177 της συνθήκης ΕΟΚ από το Social Security Commissioner και επεδίωκε προδικαστική απόφαση στην εκκρεμή διαφορά που ανέκυψε ενώπιον της διαδικασίας αυτής μεταξύ S.
et seq.) and 29 of Regulation No 574/72, the scheme applic able where there are a number of schemes in the country of stay or residence (Article 35 (1) and (2) of Regulation No 1408/71 - see No 371) Articles 32,32 (a) and 33 of Regulation No 574/72 - see No 2561 et seq.), the rules for reimburse ment between institutions (Article 36 - see No 381 et seq. of Regulation No 1408/71 and Articles 93 to 95 of Regulation No 574/72 - see No 3271 et seq.). .
Robaras εναντίον Insurance Officer, πάνω στην ερμηνεία των άρθρων 76 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
These rules relate to conditions for entitlement, the provision of benefits for beneficiaries and the sharing of expense between the institutions providing them and those on behalf of which they are provided.
1408/71 και 10 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
A — Provision of benefits in kind
574/72, το Δικαστήριο εξέδω­σε απόφαση της οποίας το διατακτικό είναι το εξής:
4364 — Certain benefits in kind must, in order to be provided by the institution of the place of residence, be notified to the competent institution.
Στην υπόθεση 238/81 που είχε σαν αντικείμενο αίτημα που απευθύνθηκε στο Δικαστήριο με εφαρμογή του άρθρου 177 της συνθήκης (ΕΟΚ) από το Centrale Raad van Beroep της Utrecht και επεδίωκε προδικαστική απόφαση, στην εκ­κρεμή διαφορά ενώπιον της διαδικασίας αυτής μεταξύ της κας van der Bund-Craig και του Raad van Arbeid της Haye, πάνω στην ερμηνεία των άρθρων 12, παράγραφος 2, και 46 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
4301 — Title III consists of eight chapters corresponding to the risks specified in Article 4 of the regulation, sickness/maternity (Chapter 1), invalidity (Chapter 2), oldage and survivors' pensions (Chapter 3), accidents at work and occupational diseases (Chapter 4), death grants (Chapter 5), unemployment (Chapter 6), family benefits and family allowances (Chapter 7), benefits for dependent children of pensioners and for orphans (Chapter 8).
1408/71 και του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
According to former Article 17 (7) of Regulation No 572/72, such notification was required for a range of 'substantial' be nefits, the list of which was adopted by the Administrative Commission in Decision No 93 of 24 January 1974 (OJ C105, 24.1.1974).
574/72 του Συμβουλίου, το Δικαστήριο εξέδω­σε απόφαση της οποίας το διατακτικό είναι το εξής:
The first chapter contains the general rules relating to the aggregation of periods, the remaining seven correspond closely with the eight chapters (Title III) of Regulation No 1408/71, the only difference being that the implementing provisions for the articles in Regulation No 1408/71 concerning invalidity, old age and death (pensions) have been grouped together in the same chapter (Chapter 3) of Regulation No 574/72.
Η ρήτρα αναστολής της πρώτης φράσης του άρθρου 10, παράγραφος 1, εδάφιο α), του Κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
Moreover, Decision No 121 of 21 April 1983 defines the concept of urgency and absolute urgency within the meaning of that Article (OJ C 193, 20.7.1983).
ΣΥΛΛΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΙΚΩΝ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΩΝ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΗ ΑΣΦΑΛΙΣΗ
The scope of the benefits referred to under No 4361 is in fact only deter­mined by the provisions of the legislation applied by the institution of the place of residence.
'Ενα τέτοιο λοιπόν επίδομα πρέπει να εξομοιώνεται με παροχή γήρατος κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 4, παρά­γραφος 1, γράμμα γ), του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ. 1408/71.
— even if it were true that that provision did not apply to sick­ness benefits, it would be contrary to the aim of Article 51 of the Treaty and to the general scheme of Regulation No 1408/71 that a worker who has submitted a claim for inva­lidity benefit in accordance with that provision, should have his claim refused on the ground that, at an earlier stage, he had not submitted a claim for sickness benefit to the competent institution of another Member State.
Ελλείψει ειδικών διατάξεων που να αφορούν αυτό το επίδομα στον κανονισμό (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
The reasoned refusal is essentially in response to the con­cern to give the competent institution a means of avoiding abuses by assessing the medical need to award such bene­fit, in particular where it has itself already provided similar benefits.
1408/71, πρέπει να γίνει δεκτό πως η παροχή αυτή καλύπτεται από την άρση ρητρών διαμονής που προβλέπεται από το άρ­θρο 10, παράγραφος 1, του κανονισμού αυτού.»
On the other hand, the refusal of the pension depended on the fact that the person concerned had not had his entitle­ment to sickness benefit recognized for a period of 168 days as provided for under British legislation and which underthe said legislation constituted a prerequisite to the award of invalidity pension.
Δημοσίευση της απόφασης: ΕΕ C 168 της 28 6 1983.
See first part, I-1B, Regulation No 574/72, No 2417.
Εφόσον ο εργαζόμενος λαμβάνει σύνταξη με βάση μόνο την εθνική νομοθεσία, οι διατάξεις του κανονι­σμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
— where a worker has been successively subject to the legislations of two Member States, of which at least one is of Type B, the provisions of Article 45 of the regulation are applicable by analogy to invalidity benefits;
1408/71 δεν εμποδίζουν, η μόνη εθνική νομοθεσία να εφαρμόζεται σ' αυτόν εξ ολοκλήρου, περιλαμβανομένων των εθνικών αντισωρευτικών διατάξεων.
— by virtue of Regulation No 1408/71 periods of insurance completed in the Federal Republic of Germany should be taken into account, to the extent necessary, forthe acqui­sition of the right to sickness benefits provided under Britsh legislation and to invalidity benefits, as though the periods had been completed under British legislation.
Εάν πάντως η εφαρμογή της εθνικής αυτής νομοθεσίας παρουσιάζεται λιγότερο ευνοϊκή για τον εργαζόμενο σε σύγκριση με το καθεστώς του άρθρου 46 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
4700-1 — On the interpretation to be placed on this provi­sion, reference should be made to the operative part of the judgment given by the Court on 10 March 1983 in Case 232/ 82 (Baccini): 'Article 40 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 must be inter­preted as meaning that the "decision... concerning the de­gree of invalidity" to which that provision refers covers exclu­sively a decision establishing invalidity and not a decision determining that there is no invalidity at a later date.'
1408/71, πρέπει να εφαρμόζονται οι διατάξεις του άρθρου αυτού.
'Article 45 of Regulation No 1408/71 must be understood to mean that where the legislation of a Member State makes the acquistion of a right to invalidity benefit conditional upon the person concerned having been entitled to sickness be­nefit under that legislation for a given period in the immedia­tely preceding period - that condition being subject, as far as material, (a) to the completion of periods of insurance, (b) to the making of a claim therefor in a prescibed manner and within a prescribed time:
Στην τελευταία αυτή υπόθεση, είναι εφαρμοστέα η παράγραφος 3, του άρθρου 46, με αποκλεισμό των αντισωρευτικών κανόνων που προβλέ­πονται από την εθνική νομοθεσία.
2. whether the fact that the invalidity insurance legislation of a Member State had been amended (change from a Β Type to an A Type legislation), was likely to deprive the person concerned of entitlement to benefits by preventing the appli­cation of Article 45 (3) of Regulation No 1408/71 to his case.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου της 5ης Ιουλίου 1983 στην υπόθεση 171/82 (αίτημα προδικαστικής απόφασης του εφετείου της Lyon): Β. Valentini/Assedic της Lyon
'Article 40 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 must be interpreted as meaning that it relates to the award of inva­lidity benefit in a Member State in which the right to such be­nefits has been awarded to an employed person on the basis of legislation of the type referred to in Article 37 (1) including the case in which the person concerned, before the acquisi­tion of such right, has already become entitled, by virtue of the legislation of another Member State not being of that type, to an oldage benefit resulting from the transformation of an earlier invalidity benefit.'
(Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: γαλλικά).
In connection with this case vide also No 4795.
Δημοσίευση του προδικαστικού ερωτήματος: ΕΕ C 189 της 23. 7. 1982.
In the dispute between the claimant and the UK institutions, the Office making the reference asked for a preliminary ruling on the following questions:
Εφόσον οι παροχές της ίδιας φύσης έχουν χορηγηθεί και καταβληθεί σε διάφορα κράτη μέλη με βάση τις αντίστοιχες εθνικές νομοθεσίες χωρίς καμμιά αναφο­ρά στις διατάξεις του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
If the answer to question 1 is in the terms of (b) whether a worker who has been employed successively in two or more Member States before becoming incapable of work is during such incapacity to be treated or the purposes of Article 13 of the said Regulation as subject only to the legislation of the Member State in which he was first employed or of the Member State in which he is resident or of some other and, if so, what Member State.
Καμιά διάταξη του κοινοτικού δικαίου δεν επιβάλλει τον περιοδικό επανυπολογισμό μιας παροχής κοινω­νικής ασφάλισης της οποίας το ποσό έχει καθορισθεί σ' άλλο κράτος μέλος με αιτιολογικό μια διακύμανση της τιμής μετατροπής των νομισμάτων.»
If the answer to question 1 is in the terms of (c) or (d) thereof whether a claiment for contributory sickness benefit is to be treated for the purpose of the said Article 1 (o) (i) as insured with an institution:
Valentini και του Assedie της Lyon, πάνω στην ερμηνεία του άρθρου 46 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
There was no objective reason for subjecting this case to a different system than that which applied in respect of cases for which express provision had been made.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου της 10ης ΜαΤου 1983 στην υπόθεση 139/82 (αίτημα προδικαστικής απόφασης της ιταλικής Corte Suprema di Cassazione): P. Piscitello/ Instituto Nazionale della previdenza Soziale — INPS
The pro­tection of entitlement which the person concerned derived by virtue of national legislation alone, without having re­course to the system of aggregation and proratization, as well as respect for the benefits which might result from that system, applied equally in all situations.
«Παροχές όπως τα επιδόματα με βάση την «εγγύηση εισοδημάτων παραίτησης» που προβλέπονται σε εξειδι­κευμένες γαλλικές διατάξεις, δεν ανήκουν στο άρθρο 46 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
The consistent in­terpretation of the provisions of the regulation permit as a re­sult, an application by analogy of Article 40 (1) to cases such as that under consideration.
(Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: ιταλικά).
It might even be felt that If this solution could not be retained then the Council would not
(Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: γερμανικά).
State of the institution are such that by virtue of those contributions alone he satisfies the contribution con­ditions for sickness benefit either at the full rate or at some reduced rate; or
Στην υπόθεση 139/82 που είχε σαν αντικείμενο αίτημα που απευθύνθηκε στο Δικαστήριο, με εφαρμογή του άρθρου 177 της συνθήκης από την ιταλική Corta Suprema di Cassazione και επεδίωκε προδικαστική απόφαση, στην εκκρεμή διαφορά ενώπιον της διαδικασίας αυτής, μεταξύ της κας Μ.
No 574/72 as meaning that account could not be taken of benefits or amounts of benefits corresponding to periods of voluntary or optional continued insurance for the reduction to be operated under Article 45 (3), even if the periods do not coincide with other periods of insurance or residence.
1408/71 του Συμβουλίου, το Δικαστήριο εξέδωσε απόφαση της οποίας το διατακτικό είναι το εξής:
(b) if alternatively on the occurrence at that time or at some later time of any other contingency against which he is insured underthe same scheme with that institution he or members of his familiy would by vir­tue of his contributions, in such Member State alone satisfy the contribution conditions for such benefit; or
Jerzak και της Bundesknappschaft-Verwaltungsstelle Aachen, πάνω στην ερμηνεία των άρθρων 12, 46 και 57 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
(c) in such other circumstances as may be indicated by the European Court of Justice.
Ένα επίδομα όπως το επίδομα κοινωνικής βοήθειας που προβλέπεται στο άρθρο 26 του ιταλικού νόμου αριθ.
For the purposes of the application of Article 46 (2) of 1 Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council, must a con­tribution period under the Invaliditeitswet [Invalidity Law] be deemed to have been completed under 'legislation' within the meaning of Article 1 (j) in conjunction with Article 1 (r) and with Article 92 (2) of that Regulation?
1408/71, με βάση τις διατάξεις του άρθρου 4, παράγραφος 4.
In a judgment of 12 January 1983, the Court ruled:
Ένα επίδομα του τύπου εκείνου που προβλέπεται στο άρθρο 26 του προλεχθέντα ιταλικού νόμου καταβάλ­λεται με τις προϋποθέσεις και με βάση τα αντικειμενι­κά κριτήρια που ορίζονται από το νόμο αυτό, στους ηλικιωμένους υπηκόους, με σκοπό να τους εξασφαλί­σει ένα ελάχιστο όριο μέσων συντήρησης.
If a contribution period is completed under 'legislation' within the meaning of the said Article 1 (j) in conjunction with Article 1 (r), is it to be regarded as an insurance pe­riod other than a period treated as such, within the mean­ing of Article 15 (1) (c) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council, or is it to be regarded as a period treated as an insurance period under the legislation of a Member State within the meaning of the lastmentioned provi­sion?
1408/71 και αν το αρμόδιο ίδρυμα του πρώτου κράτους μέλους συμβάλλει στη χρηματοδότηση των παροχών αυτών με τους όρους που ορίζονται στο άρθρο 57, παράγραφος 3, εδάφιο c).
4780 - Articles 44 to 51 of Regulation No 1408/71 determine the rules applicable for the determination of entitlement to oldage and survivor's benefits and invalidity benefits when the amount of those benefits depends on the duration of periods completed by the person concerned under the legislation of two more Member States (Type Β benefits) or when the person concerned has been successively or alternately subject to Type A and Type Β legislations.
«Για την εφαρμογή του άρθρου 46 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
In a judgment of 2 February 1984, the Court of Justice ruled: 'For the purposes of Article 46 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 (OJ L149, p.
1408/71 του Συμβουλίου και του άρθρου 15 του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ.
1), and Article 15 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 (OJ L 74, p.
574/72 του Συμβουλίου, πρέπει να θεωρούνται σαν περίοδοι ασφάλισης, και όχι σαν εξομοι­ούμενες περίοδοι:
1), the following are to be regarded as periods of insur­ance and not as periods to be treated as such:
Δημοσίευση της απόφασης: ΕΕ C 290 της 26. 10. 1983.
4781 — The rules for applying Chapter 3 of Regulation No 1408/71 are laid down in Chapter 3 of Regulation No 574/72 (Articles 35 to 59).
α) περίοδος εργασίας που πραγματοποιήθηκε πριν την 1η Ιανουαρίου 1965 υπό την ολλανδική νομοθεσία που ίσχυε την εποχή εκείνη, για την οποία καταβλήθηκαν εισφορές με βάση τη νομοθεσία αυτή· του
(a) a period of employment completed before 1 January 1965 under the Netherlands legislation in force at the time in respect of which contributions were paid thereunder;
Δικαστηρίου της
4823 - In its decision of 5 April 1979 (Case 176/78, Schaap), the Court of Justice interpreted Article 46 (2) of Regulation
Χώρες πριν την 1η Ιουλίου 1967 για την οποία δεν έχουν καταβληθεί εισφορές.»
Article 47 cerned in that occupation before he became incapacitated for work, or of the average wage received by him over a cer­tain number of days (which must not fall more than two years before he became incapacitated for work).'