natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I sin detaljerede udtalelse om forslaget til henstilling anførte EPSO, at de evalueringskriterier, som udvælgelseskomitéen havde fastlagt, var anderledes end de forskellige instrukser, henstillinger og udtalelser, de enkelte evaluatorer modtager.
In its detailed opinion on the draW recommendation, EPSO stated that the evaluation criteria laid down by the Selection Board could be separated from the various instructions, recommendations and opinions that are given to the individual evaluators.
EPSO vedlagde imidlertid en kopi af klagerens opgave med evaluatorernes håndskrevne notater for at give klageren i denne sag mulighed for bedre at forstå sin karakter.
However, in order to allow the complainant in this case to bemer understand the marks that she had been given, EPSO enclosed a copy of the complainant’s examination paper containing the evaluators’ handwrimen notes.
EPSO fremsame endvidere i et separat notat detaljerede bemærkninger om disse remelser og forklarede prøvekravene.
In a separate note, EPSO also made detailed remarks on those corrections, explaining the test requirements.
Det påpegede endvidere, at vurderingen af fejlene i prøven var indeholdt i det evalueringsskema, som klageren allerede havde modtaget en kopi af.
It also pointed out that the assessment of the mistakes appearing on the examination paper was contained in the evaluation sheet, a copy of which had already been sent to the complainant.
Ombudsmanden konkluderede, at de langt mere detaljerede oplysninger, som EPSO havde fremsendt i denne sag, normalt burde hjælpe en kandidat til bedre at forstå den karakter, han eller hun havde fået, og at der derfor ikke var anledning til at undersøge denne specifikke sag nærmere.
The Ombudsman took the view that the much more detailed information provided by EPSO in this case should normally help a candidate bemer to understand the marks that he or she had been given and that there were therefore no grounds for continuing his inquiry in this specific case.
Ombudsmanden bemærkede imidlertid, at EPSO’s udtalelse rejste vigtige faktuelle og juridiske spørgsmål af mere overordnet karakter.
The Ombudsman noted, however, that EPSO’s opinion raised important factual and legal issues of a more general nature.
Han beslumede derfor at iværksæme en undersøgelse på eget initiativ om spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt kandidater bør have aktindsigt i de evalueringskriterier, som fastlægges af udvælgelseskomitéer.
He therefore decided to launch an own-initiative inquiry into the issue of granting candidates access to the evaluation criteria established by selection boards.
Ombudsmanden afslumede endvidere på samme grundlag sine undersøgelser af to lignende sager, hvor han havde fremsat forslag til henstillinger til EPSO: 413/2004/PB og 2028/2003/PB.
The Ombudsman also closed, on the same basis, his inquiries into two similar cases in which draW recommendations had been made to EPSO: 413/2004/PB and 2028/2003/PB.
Den undersøgelse på eget initiativ, som Ombudsmanden omtalte, blev indledt den 10. oktober 2005 (OI/5/05/PB).
The own-initiative inquiry announced by the Ombudsman was opened on 10 October 2005 (OI/5/05/PB).
Resultatet af denne undersøgelse vil blive oTentliggjort på Ombudsmandens websted.
The results of the inquiry will be published on the Ombudsman’s website.
ADGANG TIL UDVÆLGELSESPRØVER
ADMISSION TO SELECTION TESTS
Sammendrag af afgørelse om klage 839/2004/MHZ over Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO)
Summary of decision on complaint 839/2004/MHZ against the European Personnel Selection OU ce (EPSO)
En ungarsk statsborger ansøgte om deltagelse i en almindelig udvælgelsesprøve tilremelagt af EPSO med henblik på ansæmelse af assisterende oversæmere.
A Hungarian citizen applied to take part in an open competition for assistant translators organised by EPSO.
Han anførte i sin ansøgningsformular, at han ville få det påkrævede eksamensbevis få måneder e W er registreringsdatoen.
He stated in his application form that he would obtain the required diploma a few months a W er the registration date.
Da han blev indbudt til stopprøven, troede han, at EPSO havde godkendt hans ansøgning.
When he was invited to am end the pre-selection tests, he believed that EPSO had accepted his application.
Han bestod stopprøven og f i k dermed adgang til de skriWlige prøver.
He successfully passed the pre-selection tests and was admimed to the wrimen tests.
Et par måneder senere meddelte EPSO ham imidlertid, at han var blevet udelukket fra udvælgelsen, da han ikke havde det påkrævede eksamensbevis på ansøgningsdatoen.
However, a few months later EPSO informed him that he had been excluded from the selection because he did not have the required diploma on the application date.
Derfor blev hans skriWlige prøver ikke evalueret.
For that reason, his wrimen tests were not evaluated.
Klageren gjorde gældende, at det var uretfærdigt, at EPSO havde udelukket ham fra udvælgelsesproceduren e W er at have godtaget hans ansøgning og ladet ham deltage i stopprøven og de skriWlige prøver.
The complainant alleged that it was unfair for EPSO to exclude him from the selection procedure a W er having accepted his application and a W er having allowed him to participate in the pre-selection and wrimen tests.
På datoen for indgivelse af klagen var klageren hverken unionsborger eller bosiddende i en medlemsstat.
At the date of the complaint, the complainant was neither a citizen of the Union nor residing in a Member State.
Ombudsmanden mente, at klagens genstand burde undersøges, og indledte derfor en undersøgelse på eget initiativ. EPSO underremede e W erfølgende Ombudsmanden om, at den accepterede, at sagen blev behandlet som en klage, i lyset af, at klageren var blevet unionsborger e W er Ungarns tiltrædelse til EU.
Since he considered that the subject mamer of the complaint should be examined, the Ombudsman opened an own-initiative inquiry.
EPSO forklarede, at udvælgelseskomitéen i henhold til meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøven først kunne beslume, om klageren havde opfyldt det pågældende krav e W er en undersøgelse af hele klagerens ansøgning.
EPSO explained that, according to the notice of competition, the Selection Board could decide whether the complainant had fulfilled the requirement in question only a W er it had examined the complainant’s full application.
Kandidaterne skulle først indsende en sådan ansøgning, e W er at de havde bestået stopprøven.
Such an application was requested from candidates only a W er they had successfully passed the pre-selection tests.
EPSO henviste til Remen i Første Instans’ retspraksis, i henhold til hvilken det i meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøven kan fastlægges, at visse specifikke adgangskrav skal verificeres e W er remelse af stopprøven.
EPSO referred to the case-law of the Court of First Instance, according to which the notice of competition can determine that certain specific eligibility requirements are to be verified a W er the marking of the pre-selection tests.
Ombudsmanden bemærkede, at det i meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøven blev forklaret, at udvælgelseskomitéen ville kontrollere kandidaternes kvalifikationer i to trin.
The Ombudsman noted that the notice of competition explained that the Selection Board would check candidates’ eligibility in two stages.
EWersom EPSO syntes at have handlet i overensstemmelse med meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøven og havde taget højde for den relevante retspraksis, konstaterede Ombudsmanden intet tilfælde af fejl eller forsømmelser.
Since EPSO appeared to have acted in accordance with the notice of competition and had taken into account the relevant case-law, the Ombudsman found no maladministration.
Ombudsmanden fremsame imidlertid en yderligere bemærkning, hvori han foreslog, at EPSO for at undgå misforståelser og forbedre forholdet til kandidater i fremtidige meddelelser om udvælgelsesprøver udtrykkeligt kunne anføre, (i) at en invitation til en stopprøve ikke betyder, at kandidatens opfyldelse af kriterierne er blevet undersøgt til bunds, og (ii) at skriWlige prøver fra kandidater, som senere viser sig ikke at opfylde kriterierne, ikke vil blive remet. et.
However, the Ombudsman made a further remark suggesting that, to avoid possible misunderstandings and to improve relations with candidates, EPSO could consider explicitly stating in future notices of competition that (i) an invitation to am end the pre-selection tests does not imply that the eligibility of the candidate has been fully checked and (ii) the wrimen tests of candidates who are subsequently found to be ineligible will not be marked.
I et brev af 14. september 2005 underremede EPSO Ombudsmanden om, at det i fremtidige meddelelser om udvælgelsesprøver ville indsæme de to oplysninger, som Ombudsmanden havde nævnt i sin yderligere bemærkning.
By lemer of 14 September 2005, EPSO informed the Ombudsman that future notices of competition would mention the two points raised by the Ombudsman in his further remark.
OPLYSNINGER OM EVENTUEL INTERVENTION FRA ECB’S SIDE
INFORMATION CONCERNING A POSSIBLE INTERVENTION BY THE ECB
Sammendrag af afgørelse om klage 3054/2004/TN over Den Europæiske Centralbank
Summary of decision on complaint 3054/2004/TN against the European Central Bank
Klageren gjorde gældende, at ECB havde undladt at begrunde, hvorfor den havde undladt at svare på hans spørgsmål om, hvorvidt den havde interveneret på valutamarkederne for at aYøde faldet i dollarkursen og stigningen i euroens værdi.
The complainant alleged that the ECB had failed to explain its reasons for not answering his question as to whether it had intervened in the foreign exchange markets to so W en the fall of the dollar and the rise in value of the euro.
ECB gjorde gældende, at den havde svaret på hans spørgsmål så godt, som det var muligt. Der var imidlertid gode grunde til, at ECB ikke kommenterede interventioner.
The ECB argued that it had replied to his questions to the extent possible.
Oplysninger om interventioner på valutamarkederne er markedsfølsomme, og oTentliggørelsen deraf spiller en afgørende rolle for den generelle gennemførelse af politikken.
Information regarding foreign exchange interventions is market sensitive and its communication plays a crucial role in the overall policy implementation.
Derfor skal dem e håndteres meget forsigtigt, således at formålet ikke undermineres.
As a result, such communication has to be handled with great care in order not to undermine the impact of the operation.
ECB forbeholder sig som alle andre centralbanker ret til at beslume, hvorvidt, hvornår og hvordan den skal oTentliggøre oplysninger om interventioner.
The ECB, like any other central bank, reserves the right to decide whether, when and by what means information should be communicated regarding interventions.
Ombudsmanden mindede om, at i henhold til artikel 1 i EU-traktaten skal beslutninger t r æ T es så åbent som muligt og så tæt på borgerne som muligt, og fandt, at borgerne i princippet burde få de oplysninger, de beder om, vedrørende beslutninger fra Fællesskabets institutioner og organer.
The Ombudsman, recalling Article 1 of the Treaty on European Union, which provides that decisions should be taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen, considered that, in principle, citizens should be provided with the information that they request concerning decisions made by Community institutions and bodies.
Ombudsmanden fandt, at den institution eller det organ, der afslår en sådan anmodning, bør give borgeren specifikke oplysninger, som klart og utvetydigt forklarer begrundelserne for afslaget.
In those situations where it is not possible to provide the requested information, the Ombudsman considered that the institution or body refusing the request should give the citizen s u U ciently specific reasons to show clearly and unequivocally the reasoning behind its refusal.
Ombudsmanden bemærkede, at Fællesskabets domstoles retspraksis konsekvent anvender denne fremgangsmåde i forbindelse med behandlingen af begæringer om aktindsigt.
The Ombudsman noted that the case-law of the Community courts consistently applies this approach in relation to the handling of requests for access to documents.
I visse tilfælde viser retspraksis imidlertid, at det kan være tilstrækkeligt at henvise til visse kategorier af dokumenter.
In certain cases, however, the case-law shows that reasoning by reference to categories of document may be s u U cient.
Ombudsmanden fandt, at ECB’s grunde til at give afslag på aktindsigt i de ønskede oplysninger opfylder den krævede juridiske standard, idet de klart og utvetydigt forklarede ECB’s begrundelser og gav klageren mulighed for at forstå, hvorfor ECB gav afslag på aktindsigt i den pågældende kategori af oplysninger.
The Ombudsman took the view that the ECB’s reasons for its refusal to disclose the requested information met the required legal standard in that they showed clearly and unequivocally the ECB’s reasoning and enabled the complainant to understand why the ECB refused to divulge the requested category of information.
Ombudsmanden konstaterede derfor intet tilfælde af fejl eller forsømmelser fra ECB’s side.
The Ombudsman therefore found no maladministration by the ECB.
Ombudsmanden bemærkede, at ECB’s beslutning vedrørende aktindsigt i dokumenter er en undtagelse, som har til formål at beskyme den oTentlige interesse med hensyn til »monetær og valutakursstabilitet«.
The Ombudsman noted that the ECB’s decision concerning public access to documents provides for an exception to protect the public interest as regards “monetary and exchange rate stability”.
Ombudsmanden fandt det derfor ikke beremiget at undersøge klagerens påstand nærmere.
The Ombudsman therefore found no reason to pursue the complainant’s claim.
Sammendrag af afgørelse om klage 127/2004/OV (fortrolig) over Europa-Parlamentet
Summary of decision on complaint 127/2004/OV (Confidential) against the European Parliament
På grundlag af beregninger fra Parlamentets pensionskontor beslumede klageren, en tjenestemand i Parlamentet, at overføre de pensionsremigheder, hun tidligere havde erhvervet i Tyskland og Italien, til Fællesskabets ordning.
On the basis of calculations provided by the Parliament’s Pensions Service, the complainant, a Parliament oUcial, decided to transfer her pension rights previously acquired in Germany and Italy to the Community scheme.
Dem e kunne i teorien have givet hende en pension, som svarede til mere end 70 % af hendes sidste løn i lønklasse B3.
This transfer should, in theory, have provided her with a pension of more than 70% of her final salary in grade B3.
Pensionskontoret oplyste hende imidlertid, at hendes pension vil blive lidt under 65 %.
The Pensions Service informed her, however, that her pension would be just under 65%.
Klagerens klage i henhold til artikel 90, stk. 2, i tjenestemandsvedtægten blev afvist, og ansæmelsesmyndigheden oplyste, at ingen italienske pensionsremigheder var blevet overført.
The complainant’s appeal under Article 90(2) of the StaT Regulations was rejected and the appointing authority informed her that, in fact, no Italian pension rights had been transferred.
Klageren nedlagde påstand om, (i) at beregningen af hendes pensionsremigheder skulle revideres, og pensionssatsen fastsæmes til 70 % af hendes løn i lønklasse B3, og (ii) at overskuddet fra de pensionsremigheder, der blev overført fra Italien (1995) og Tyskland (1997), skulle udbetales til hende.
The complainant claimed that (i) the determination of her pension rights should be revised and the pension rate should be fixed at 70% of her final B3 salary and that (ii) the surplus of her pension rights transferred from Italy (1995) and Germany (1997) should be reimbursed to her.
AFGØRELSER EFTER EN UNDERSØGELSE til hende.
DECISIONS FOLLOWING AN INQUIRY
Der var imidlertid ikke blevet overført nogen pensionsremigheder fra den italienske pensionsordning.
However, no pension rights had been transferred from the Italian pension scheme.
Ombudsmanden foretog yderligere undersøgelser og anmodede Parlamentet om at give yderligere forklaringer på (i) beregningen af de overførte pensionsremigheder og den mulige udbetaling af overskuddet, og (ii) situationen vedrørende overførslen af de italienske pensionsremigheder.
The Ombudsman made further inquiries and asked Parliament for clarifications concerning (i) the calculation of the transferred pension rights and the eventual reimbursement of the surplus and (ii) the situation concerning the transfer of the Italian pension rights.
Som svar på de yderligere undersøgelser bemærkede Parlamentet, at pensionskontoret e W er at have opdaget nogle fejl i overførslerne havde lavet en ny beregning af klagerens pension. Dem e gav et langt større pensionsbeløb.
In response to the further inquiries, Parliament observed that, a W er noticing errors in the level of the transfers, the Pensions Service had recalculated the complainant’s pension.
Parlamentet forklarede, at fejlene skyldtes en forkert analyse foretaget af computersystemet.
Parliament explained that the errors had resulted from an incorrect analysis by the computer system.
EWersom klageren accepterede den nye beregning og Parlamentets forklaring vedrørende udbetalingen af overskuddet, konkluderede Ombudsmanden, at Parlamentet havde taget skridt til at løse sagen til klagerens tilfredshed.
As the complainant accepted the new calculation and Parliament’s explanation concerning the nonreimbursement of the surplus amount, the Ombudsman concluded that Parliament had taken steps to semle the mamer to the complainant’s satisfaction.
Han afslumede derfor sagen.
He therefore closed the case.
OPSIGELSE AF EN ANSÆTTELSESKONTRAKT I EN EU-POLITIMISSION
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT AT EU POLICE MISSION
Sammendrag af afgørelse om klage 471/2004/OV over Rådet for Den Europæiske Union
Summary of decision on complaint 471/2004/OV against the Council of the European Union
I juni 2003 indgav klageren sin første klage til Ombudsmanden (sag 1200/2003/OV) over opsigelsen af hans kontrakt som civil it-ekspert i Den Europæiske Unions politimission i Sarajevo (EUPM) pr. 8. december 2002.
In June 2003, the complainant made a first complaint to the Ombudsman (case 1200/2003/OV) concerning the termination of his contract as a civilian IT expert in the European Union Police Mission in Sarajevo (EUPM) as of 8 December 2002.
Ombudsmanden konkluderede i sin afgørelse om klagen (se årsberetningen for 2003), at klagerens ret til forsvar ikke var blevet respekteret.
In his decision on the case (see Annual Report 2003), the Ombudsman concluded that the complainant’s rights of defence had not been respected.
Ombudsmanden foreslog, at klageren fremsame sine påstande om, at Rådet skulle rense ham for anklagerne mod ham, samt at han skulle have udbetalt sin løn for hele december 2002, direkte til Rådet.
The Ombudsman suggested that the complainant address the Council directly with his claims that the Council should clear him of the allegations against him and that he should receive his salary for the month of December 2002.
EWersom Rådet afviste begge påstande med den begrundelse, at den ikke havde noget at gøre med hans afskedigelse, indgav klageren en ny klage til Ombudsmanden i februar 2004.
As the Council rejected both claims on the ground that it was not involved in his dismissal, the complainant made a new complaint to the Ombudsman in February 2004.
Rådet fremhævede, at dets generalsekretariat havde gjort sit yderste for at samarbejde med Ombudsmanden og fremsendt en kopi af al korrespondance i sagen til EUPM, således at EUPM også kunne samarbejde med Ombudsmanden.
The Council emphasised that its Secretariat-General had done its utmost to co-operate with the Ombudsman and had sent a copy to the EUPM of all the correspondence exchanged, in order to enable the EUPM also to co-operate with the Ombudsman.
EWer modtagelse af en udtalelse fra chefen for EUPM underremede Ombudsmanden Rådet om, at hans kritiske bemærkning i sag 1200/2003/OV konstaterede, at EUPM ikke var beremiget til at opsige klagerens kontrakt før tid, og at klagerens påstand om, at han skulle modtage betaling for tiden indtil udløbet af sin kontrakt, derfor syntes at være beremiget. Ombudsmanden bad om Rådets hjælp til at sikre, at klageren modtog den løn, han var beremiget til.
AWer receiving an opinion from the head of the EUPM, the Ombudsman informed the Council that his critical remark in case 1200/2003/OV implied that the EUPM was not entitled to terminate the complainant’s contract early and that the complainant’s claim to be paid to the end of his contract therefore appeared to be justified The Ombudsman requested the Council’s assistance to ensure that the complainant received the full salary due.
Rådet mindede i sit svar om, at betalinger i henhold til artikel 9 i Rådets fællesaktion af 11. marts 2002 om EUPM skal eTektueres gennem chefen for EUPM.
In its reply, the Council recalled that, under Article 9 of the Joint Action of March 2002 on the EUPM, payments shall be made through the authority of the Head of the EUPM.
Rådet sendte derfor en kopi af Ombudsmandens brev til chefen for EUPM og bad ham reme sin fulde opmærksomhed mod Ombudsmandens henstilling.
The Council therefore sent a copy of the Ombudsman’s lemer to the Head of the EUPM, calling his utmost amention to the Ombudsman’s recommendation.
EUPM oplyste e W erfølgende Ombudsmanden, at den for at få en afslutning på den proces, som klageren havde indledt, ville betale klageren en del af hans tidligere månedsløn til dækning af perioden 9.-31. december 2002.
The EUPM subsequently informed the Ombudsman that, in order to bring the process initiated by the complainant to a close, it would pay the complainant a proportion of his former monthly salary to cover the period from 9 to 31 December 2002.
Ombudsmanden konkluderede i sin afgørelse, at dem e aspekt af sagen var blevet løst til klagerens tilfredshed.
In his decision, the Ombudsman considered that this aspect of the case had been semled to the satisfaction of the complainant.
AFGØRELSER EFTER EN UNDERSØGELSE vedrørende faktiske forhold, som var t r u T et uden udøvelse af remen til at blive hørt, ikke er gyldige.
As regards the complainant’s claim that the Council should clear him of all allegations against him, the Ombudsman recalled that, in accordance with the principle of the rule of law, the normal position is that findings of fact made in violation of the right to be heard have no validity.
Ombudsmanden konkluderede, at klageren derfor var beremiget til at betragte sit navn som renset på grundlag af Ombudsmandens tidligere afgørelse i sag 1200/2003/OV, og at det derfor ikke var beremiget at foretage yderligere undersøgelser i sagen.
The Ombudsman concluded that the complainant was therefore entitled to regard the Ombudsman’s earlier finding in case 1200/2003/OV as clearing his name and that no further inquiries into this aspect of the case were justified. ed.
UBERETTIGET FORSINKELSE OG MANGLENDE SVAR PÅ BEGÆRING OM AKTINDSIGT
UNJUSTIFIED DELAY AND FAILURE TO REPLY TO PUBLIC ACCESS REQUEST
Sammendrag af afgørelse om klage 1798/2004/PB over Europa-Kommissionen
Summary of decision on complaint 1798/2004/PB against the European Commission
Klageren gjorde gældende, at der var sket uberemigede forsinkelser i forbindelse med Kommissionens svar på hans første begæring af 22. marts 2004 om aktindsigt i dokumenter i henhold til forordning
The complainant alleged that there had been unjustified delays in the Commission’s reply to his first application of 22 March 2004 for documents under Regulation 1049/2001 on public access to
Kommissionen havde undladt at svare på hans begæring af 26. maj 2004.
Parliament, Council and Commission documents12 and that the Commission had failed to reply to his application of 26 May 2004.
Kommissionen undskyldte for forsinkelserne og forklarede, at de skyldtes en stor arbejdsbyrde.
The Commission apologised for the delays and explained that these had been due to a heavy workload.