natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I så fald kan antallet af mandlige ansøgere, der skal indkaldes til samtale, svare til eller være større eller mindre end antallet af kvindelige ansøgere.
In that case the number of male candidates to be interviewed may be equal to or greater or lesser than the number of female candidates.
Dels er det tænkeligt, at der kun indkaldes et begrænset antal kvindelige ansøgere til samtale.
With the second, only a limited number of qualified female candidates are called to interview.
I så fald kan der højst indkaldes det samme antal mandlige ansøgere til samtale.
In that case no more than the same number of male candidates may be called to interview.
Den i hovedsagen omhandlede bestemmelse må ses som udtryk for en indskrænkende fortolkning af begrebet lige muligheder for kvinder.
That intention does not, however, necessarily entail total inflexibility.
Der er ikke tale om stillinger, som forbeholdes kvinder, men om uddannelsespladser, der skal give mulighed for at opnå de nødvendige kvalifikationer til senere at få adgang til kvalificeret arbejde i den offentlige forvaltning.
The provision at issue in the main proceedings does not imply an attempt to achieve a final result — appointment or promotion — but affords women who are qualified additional opportunities to facilitate their entry into working life and their career.
Den i hovedsagen omhandlede regel indebærer ikke, at der tilstræbes et bestemt resultat med hensyn til ansættelse eller forfremmelse, men giver de kvinder, som er kvalificerede til
It is not places in employment which are reserved for women but places in training with a view to obtaining qualifications with the prospect of subsequent access to trained occupations in the public service.
Da kvoten kun gælder for uddannelsespladser inden for områder, hvor ikke kun staten
Next, it appears from the order for reference that that provision, although laying down rules on the number of interviews to be given to women, also provides that a preliminary examination of the
stillingen, bedre muligheder for at komme ind på arbejdsmarkedet og gøre karriere.
administrative and supervisory bodies, at least half the members must be women.
Med spørgsmålets femte led ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om direktivets artikel 2, stk. 1 og 4, er til hinder for en national ordning, hvorefter mindst halvdelen af medlemmerne ved besættelsen af hverv i organer, der repræsenterer arbejdstagerne, i repræsentantskaber og i bestyrelser, skal være kvinder.
candidatures must be made and that only qualified candidates who satisfy all the conditions required or laid down are to be called to interview.
Endvidere må det fastslås, at det fremgår af forelæggelseskendelsen, at bestemmelsen ganske vist indeholder regler vedrørende det antal kvinder, som skal indkaldes til samtale, men også foreskriver, at der skal foretages en indledende gennemgang af ansøgningerne, og at kun de ansøgere, som er kvalificerede til stillingen, og som opfylder alle de nødvendige eller udtrykkeligt fastsatte betingelser, skal indkaldes til samtale.
This is consequently a provision which, by guaranteeing, where candidates have equal qualifications, that women who are qualified are called to interview, is intended to promote equal opportunity for men and women within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Directive.
HGlG's § 14, der vedrører sammensætningen af udvalg, er ikke bindende, men har karakter af en programerklæring, som anerkender, at mange organer oprettes i henhold til lov, og at den fulde virkeliggørelse af kvinders ligeberettigede medvirken i disse organer vil kræve en ændring af den pågældende lov.
Paragraph 14 of the HG1G, which concerns the composition of collective bodies, is not compulsory, in that it is a non-mandatory provision which recognises that many bodies are established by legislative provisions and that full implementation of the requirement of equal membership of women on those bodies would in any event require an amendment to the relevant law.
Desuden kan bestemmelsen ikke anvendes på hverv, som tildeles efter afholdelse af valg.
Moreover, it does not apply to offices for which elections are held.
Også dette vil nemlig kræve en ændring af den pågældende lov.
That would again require the relevant statutory bases to be amended.
Endelig indeholder bestemmelsen, da den er en programerklæring, mulighed for at inddrage andre betragtninger ved udvælgelsen.
Finally, since the provision is not mandatory it permits, to some extent, other criteria to be taken into account.
Der er følgelig tale om en bestemmelse, som garanterer de kvindelige ansøgere, der er lige så kvalificerede til stillingen som de mandlige ansøgere, at de indkaldes til en samtale forud for ansættelsen og derved tilsigter at fremme lige muligheder for mænd og kvinder i direktivets artikel 2, stk. 4's forstand.
By the fifth part of its question, the Staatsgerichtshof essentially asks whether Article 2(1) and (4) of the Directive precludes a national rule under which, when appointments are made to employees' representative bodies and
— hvorefter der ved en konkret udvælgelse af ansøgere — hvis en kvindelig og mandlig ansøger er lige kvalificeret — gives kvinder en fortrinsstilling inden for sektorer i den offentlige forvaltning, hvor de er underrepræsenteret, såfremt dette er nødvendigt f or at opfylde de bindende målangivelser i planen til fremme af kvinder, medmindre der findes andre, mere tungtvejende retlige grunde til hinder herfor, forudsat ordningen sikrer, at ansøgningerne bedømmes objektivt under hensyntagen til alle ansøgeres særlige, personlige forhold,
'Article 2(1) and (4) of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions does not preclude a national rule which in sectors of the public service where women are under-represented, gives priority, where male and female candidates have equal qualifications, to female candidates where that proves necessary for ensuring compliance with the objectives of the women's advancement plan, if no reasons of greater legal weight are opposed, provided that that rule guarantees that candidatures are the subject of an objective assessment which takes account of the specific personal situations of all candidates, prescribes that the binding targets of the women's advancement plan for temporary posts in the academic service and for academic assistants must provide for a minimum percentage of women which is at least equal to the percentage of women among graduates, holders of higher degrees and students in each discipline, in so far as its objective ¿s to eliminate under-representation of women, in trained occupations in which women are underrepresented and for which the State does not have a monopoly of training allocates at least half the training places to women, unless despite appropriate measures for drawing the attention of women to the training places available there are not enough applications from women, where male and female candidates have equal qualifications, guarantees that qualified women who satisfy all the conditions required or laid down are called to interview, in sectors in which they are under-represented,
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 10. juni 1999.
Advocate General A. Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 10 June 1999.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
He proposed that the Court should rule:
Præjudiciel »Bruxelles-konventionen —fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser — grundlæggende retsprincipper« (Domstolens plenum)
(b) to designate for filling by women a proportion of posts in the academic sector, depending on the proportion of women among graduates, holders of higher degrees, and students, on the understanding that that proportion may not be more than half of the number of posts to be filled and that automatic priority is not given to female candidates within the meaning referred to under (a);
Bamberski havde fremført civilretlige krav, blev tilpligtet at betale denne en erstatning på 350 000 FRF.
(c) to reserve half of the places on training courses for women;
Ved kendelse af 4. december 1997 har Bundesgerichtshof forelagt tre spørgsmål om fortolkningen af artikel 27, nr. 1, i konventionen af 27. september 1968.
(d) to invite to interviews for the selection of staff for appointments, an equal number of female and male candidates or only female candidates if they are suitable for the post, provided that the assessment of candidates bears in mind the profile of all the persons competing for the post, within the meaning referred to under (a).
Der blev i Tyskland indledt en efterforskning mod Dieter Krombach som følge af, at en 14 år gammel fransk statsborger var afgået ved døden i Tyskland. Efterforskningen blev dog til slut indstillet på grund af utilstrækkeligt bevis.
(2) Article 2(1) and (4) of Directive 76/207/EEC precludes national rules under which half of the members of the internal bodies of the public administration must be women.'
Efter anmeldelse fra pigens far, André Bamberski, blev der også indledt en undersøgelse i Frankrig, idet de franske domstole antager at
Case C-7/98 Dieter Krombach ν André Bamberskì Judgments Convention/Enforcement of judgments
I henhold til lovens artikel 630, hvorefter ingen rettergangsfuldmægtig må give møde for en tiltalt, der ikke møder personligt, besluttede Cour d'assises at pådømme sagen uden at give de af Dieter Krombach antagne forsvarere adgang til at svare i sagen.
Preliminary ruling (Brussels Convention (Full Court) counsel may appear on behalf of the person in contempt, the Cour d'Assises reached its decision without hearing the defence counsel instructed by Mr Krombach.
Heraf følger, at anerkendelse eller fuldbyrdelse af en retsafgørelse, der er truffet i en anden kontraherende stat, ikke kan nægtes under henvisning til grundlæggende retsprincipper i den stat, begæringen rettes til, alene med den begrundelse, at retten i domsstaten ikke har overholdt konventionens kompetenceregler.
By order of 4 December 1997, the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice), Germany, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions concerning the interpretation of Article 27, point 1, of the abovementioned Convention of 27 September 1968.
Cour d'assises idømte Dieter Krombach 15 års fængsel, idet han blev fundet skyldig i forsætlig ulovlig tvang, som havde medført døden, uden at dette dog havde været hans hensigt.
The Cour d'Assises imposed on Mr Krombach a custodial sentence of 15 years after finding him guilty of violence resulting in involuntary manslaughter.
Dieter Krombach blev — også uden at have givet møde — tilpligtet at betale André Bamberski en erstatning på 350 000 FRF.
The Cour d'Assises ordered Mr Krombach, again as being in contempt, to pay compensation to Mr Bamberski in the amount of FRF 350 000.
Da konventionens artikel 28, stk. 3, er affattet i generelle vendinger, må denne løsning principielt også anses for at gælde selv i tilfælde, hvor retten i domsstaten med urette har støttet sin kompetence over for en sagsøgt, der har bopæl i den stat, begæringen rettes til, på en regel, hvori der benyttes et nationalitetskriterium.
Those questions have arisen in proceedings between Mr Bamberski, who is domiciled in France, and Mr Krombach, who is domiciled in Germany, relating to the enforcement, in the latter Contracting State, of a judgment delivered on 13 March 1995 by the Cour d'Assises de Paris (Paris Assizes) which ordered Mr Krombach to pay to Mr Bamberski, the plaintiff in a civil claim, compensation in the amount of FRF 350 000.
Det første spørgsmål skal herefter besvares med, at retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, for så vidt angår klausulen om grundlæggende retsprincipper i konventionens artikel 27, nr. 1, ikke over for en sagsøgt, der har bopæl på statens område, må tage hensyn til den omstændighed i sig selv, at retten i domsstaten har støttet sin kompetence på den persons nationalitet, som har været udsat for en strafbar handling.
Mr Krombach was the subject of a preliminary investigation in Germany following the death in Germany of a 14-year-old girl of French nationality. That preliminary investigation was subsequently discontinued.
På begæring af André Bamberski (rekvirenten) blev dommen af 13. marts 1995 erklæret eksigibel i Tyskland af formanden for en borgerlig afdeling ved Landgericht Kempten, som havde den stedlige kompetence.
On application by Mr Bamberski, the President of a civil chamber of the Landgericht (Regional Court) Kempten (Germany), which had jurisdiction rarione loci, declared the judgment of 13 March 1995 to be enforceable in Germany.
Afgørelsen blev af Dieter Krombach (rekvisitus) indbragt for Oberlandesgericht, som stadfæstede den. Rekvisitus indbragte derefter den sidstnævnte afgørelse for Bundesgerichtshof ved »Rechtsbeschwerde«, idet han for Bundesgerichtshof gjorde gældende, at han ikke effektivt havde kunnet varetage sine interesser i forbindelse med domfældelsen ved den franske ret.
Following dismissal by the Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) of the appeal which he had lodged against that decision, Mr Krombach brought an appeal on a point of law ('Rechtsbeschwerde') before the Bundesgerichtshof in which he submitted that he had been unable effectively to defend himself against the judgment given against him by the French court.
Herefter besluttede Bundesgerichtshof at udsætte sagen og at forelægge Domstolen nogle præjudicielle spørgsmål.
Those are the circumstances in which the Bundesgerichtshof decided to stay proceedings and to refer a number of questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Med dette spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, for så vidt angår klausulen
In response to a complaint by Mr Bamberski, the father of the young girl, a preliminary investigation was opened in France, the French courts declaring that they had jurisdiction by virtue of the fact that the victim was a French national.
Med dette spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, for så vidt angår klausulen om grundlæggende retsprincipper i konventionens artikel 27, nr. 1, over for en sagsøgt, der har bopæl på statens område og er tiltalt for en forsætlig lovovertrædelse, kan tage hensyn til, at retten i domsstaten har afvist at
By this question, the national court is essentially asking whether, regard being had to the publicpolicy clause contained in Article 27, point 1, of the Convention, the court of the State in which enforcement is sought can, with respect to a defendant domiciled in that State, take into account the fact that the court of the State of origin based its jurisdiction on the nationality of the victim of an offence.
retten hertil, alene fordi han ikke personligt deltager i retsforhandlingerne.
It should be noted at the outset that it follows from the specific terms of the first paragraph of Article 1 of the Convention that the Convention applies to decisions given in civil matters by a criminal court.
give den pågældende ret til at lade en anden varetage sine interesser uden at give møde personligt.
Under the system of the Convention, the court before which enforcement is sought cannot review the jurisdiction of the court of the State of origin.
Det bemærkes, at forbuddet i konventionens artikel 29 og artikel 34, stk. 3, mod en efterprøvelse af den udenlandske retsafgørelses realitet indebærer, at retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, ikke må afvise at anerkende eller fuldbyrde retsafgørelsen alene med den begrundelse, at den retsregel, retten i domsstaten har anvendt, afviger fra den retsregel, som retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, ville have anvendt, hvis den skulle påkende sagen.
Article 29 and the third paragraph of Article 34 of the Convention prohibit the court of the State in which enforcement is sought from refusing to recognise or enforce that judgment solely on the ground that there is a discrepancy between the legal rule applied by the court of the State of origin and that which would have been applied by the court of the State in which enforcement is sought had it been seised of the dispute.
Retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, må heller ikke efterprøve rigtigheden af den retlige bedømmelse eller den bedømmelse af de faktiske omstændigheder, der er foretaget af retten i domsstaten.
Similarly, the court of the State in which enforcement is sought cannot review the accuracy of the findings of law or fact made by the court of the State of origin.
Den forelæggende ret har imidlertid rejst spørgsmål om, hvorvidt retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, for så vidt angår konventionens artikel 27, nr. 1, kan tage hensyn til en tilsidesættelse af denne karakter på baggrund af ordlyden af protokollens artikel II.
It follows that the public policy of the State in which enforcement is sought cannot be raised as a bar to recognition or enforcement of a judgment given in another Contracting State solely on the ground that the court of origin failed to comply with the rules of the Convention which relate to jurisdiction.
I denne bestemmelse anerkendes der imidlertid kun en ret til at lade en anden forsvare sine interesser uden at give møde personligt ved kriminalretter i en kontraherende stat for personer, der ikke er statsborgere i den pågældende stat og har bopæl i en anden kontraherende stat, såfremt de forfølges for en uagtsom lovovertrædelse. Denne begrænsning er blevet fortolket således, at konventionen klart tilsigter at udelukke personer, som er tiltalt for lovovertrædelser, hvis grovhed gør det berettiget, fra retten til at lade sig forsvare uden at møde personligt.
Having regard to the generality of the wording of the third paragraph of Article 28 of the Convention, that statement of the law must be regarded as being, in principle, applicable even where the court of the State of origin wrongly founded its jurisdiction, in regard to a defendant domiciled in the territory of the State in which enforcement is sought, on a rule which has recourse to a criterion of nationality.
En anvendelse af klausulen om grundlæggende retsprincipper i konventionens artikel 27, nr. 1, kan kun komme på tale i tilfælde, hvor anerkendelse eller fuldbyrdelse af den retsafgørelse, der er truffet i en anden kontraherende stat, på helt uantagelig måde vil være i strid med retsordenen i den stat, begæringen rettes til, idet dette ville udgøre et indgreb i et grundlæggende princip.
Recourse to the publicpolicy clause in Article 27, point 1, of the Convention can be envisaged only where recognition or enforcement of the judgment delivered in another Contracting State would be at variance to an unacceptable degree with the legal order of the State in which enforcement is sought inasmuch as it infringes a fundamental principle.
For at være i overensstemmelse med forbuddet mod efterprøvelse af den udenlandske retsafgørelses realitet, må det kræves, at indgrebet udgør en åbenbar overtrædelse af en retsregel, der anses for væsentlig i retsordenen i den stat, begæringen rettes til, eller af en rettighed, der er anerkendt som grundlæggende i den pågældende retsorden.
In order for the prohibition of any review of the foreign judgment as to its substance to be observed, the infringement would have to constitute a manifest breach of a rule of law regarded as essential in the legal order of the State in which enforcement is sought or of a right recognised as being fundamental within that legal order.
Det bemærkes imidlertid, at det fremgår af Domstolens praksis, at retten til kontradiktion under enhver procedure, som iværksættes over for en person, og som kan munde ud i en retsakt, der er bebyrdende for den pågældende, er et grundlæggende fællesskabsretligt princip, som skal overholdes, selv om der ikke er fastsat bestemmelser vedrørende den pågældende procedure.
The answer to the first question must therefore be that the court of the State in which enforcement is sought cannot, with respect to a defendant domiciled in that State, take account, for the purposes of the publicpolicy clause in Article 27, point 1, of the Convention, of the fact, without more, that the court of the State of origin based its jurisdiction on the nationality of the victim of an offence.
Med hensyn til den ret til at varetage sine interesser, som der henvises til i det præjudicielle spørgsmål, bemærkes, at den indtager en fremtrædende plads i tilrettelæggelsen og afviklingen af en retfærdig rettergang, og at den hører til de grundlæggende rettigheder, der følger af medlemsstaternes fælles forfatningsmæssige traditioner.
With regard to the right to be defended, to which the question submitted to the Court refers, this occupies a prominent position in the organisation and conduct of a fair trial and is one of the fundamental rights deriving from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States.
Domstolen har også fastslået, at selv om konventionens formål er at tilvejebringe en forenkling af formaliteterne vedrørende gensidig anerkendelse og fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser, bør dette formål imidlertid ikke opnås på bekostning af retten til forsvar.
More specifically still, the European Court of Human Rights has on several occasions ruled in cases relating to criminal proceedings that, although not absolute, the right of every person charged with an offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, if need be one appointed by the court, is one of the fundamental elements in a fair trial and an accused person does not forfeit entitlement to such a right simply because he is not present at the hearing.
Det følger af denne udvikling i retspraksis, at det må anses for muligt at benytte klausulen om grundlæggende retsprincipper i de ekstraordinære tilfælde, hvor de garantier, der er opstillet i domsstatens lovgivning og i selve konventionen, ikke har været tilstrækkelige til at beskytte sagsøgte mod en klar tilsidesættelse af
By this question, the national court is essentially asking whether, in relation to the publicpolicy clause in Article 27, point 1, of the Convention, the court of the State in which enforcement is sought can, with respect to a defendant domiciled in its territory and charged with an intentional offence, take into account the fact that the court of the State of origin refused to allow that defendant to have his defence presented unless he appeared in person.
Nærmere bestemt har Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol ved flere lejligheder fastslået i forbindelse med straffesager, at der ganske vist ikke er tale om en absolut ret, men at enhver tiltalts ret til faktisk at lade sit forsvar varetage af en advokat, som i givet fald beskikkes, hører til de grundlæggende led i en retfærdig rettergang, og at en tiltalt ikke mister
It follows from that case-law that a national court of a Member State is entitled to hold that a refusal to hear the defence of an accused person who is not present at the hearing
hans ret til forsvar ved retten i domsstaten, som anerkendt af Menneskerettighedsdomstolen.
That provision recognises the right to be defended without appearing in person before the criminal courts of a Contracting State for persons who are not nationals of that State and who are domiciled in another Contracting State only in so far as they are being prosecuted for an offence committed unintentionally.
Protokollens artikel II kan herefter ikke fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for, at retten i den stat, begæringen rettes til, for så vidt angår de i konventionens artikel 27, nr. 1, nævnte grundlæggende retsprincipper, kan tage hensyn til, at retten i domsstaten i forbindelse med påkendelsen af et erstatningskrav, der støttes på en lovovertrædelse, har nægtet at lade en tiltalt, der forfølges for en forsætlig lovovertrædelse, forsvare sig i sagen, alene fordi han ikke har
This restriction has been construed as meaning that the Convention clearly seeks to deny the right to be defended without appearing in person to persons who are being prosecuted for offences which are sufficiently serious to justify this.