natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sag C-510/99 Republikkens anklagemyndighed / Xavier Tridon
For those reasons the contested decision must be annulled and it is unnecessary to consider the other pleas raised by the applicant.
Præjudiciel — Oberster Gerichtshof—fortolkning af artikel 10a i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af 2. juni 1983 - særlig ikkebidragspligtig ydelse — anvendelsesområde — plejeydelser i henhold til den østrigske Bundespflegegesetz
Annuls the Commissions decision contained in its letter of 20 June 1997, rejecting the complaint made by the applicant seeking a declaration that a cooperation agreement between Stork Amsterdam BV and Seme Group for marketing production lines for manufacturing plastic bottles and aseptically filling them with liquid foods is incompatible with Article 85 of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 EC);
3626/82 af 3. december 1982 om gennemførelse i Fællesskabet af konventionen om international handel med udryddelsestruede vilde dyr og planter (samt artikel VII og XIV i denne konvention), af Rådets forordning 338/97 af 9. december 1996 om beskyttelse af vilde dyr og planter ved kontrol af handelen hermed, samt EF-traktatens artikel 30 og 36 (nu artikel 28 og 30 EF) — nationale regler, hvorefter der permanent og på hele den pågældende
Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, apart from those occasioned to the applicant by the intervention of Serac which shall bear its own costs, and the applicant to bear the costs it has incurred as a result of Serac's intervention.'
Ny angivelse af traktatbestemmelser
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 17 February 2000.
Vi erindrer om, at nr. 21/99 og 22/99 af denne publikation indeholder en meddelelse om den nye fremgangsmåde for angivelse af traktatbestemmelser i Domstolens og Rettens tekster.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 15 February 2000.
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Preliminary ruling — Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Interpretation of Article 5(4) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Temporary derogation in favour of Portugal regarding the taxation ofprofits transferred to a parent company in another Member State — Legality of a lump-sum tax on successions and donations levied annually on the income of certain securities (shares and bonds)
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Advocate General G. Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 17 February 2000.
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
TEAM Sri ν Commission of the European Communities
Sag T-22/99 Gustave Rose / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-22/99 Gustave Rose v Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Forenede sager T-223/97 og T-17/98 . . .
Joined Cases T-223/97 and T-17/98 Reinder Kooyman and Petra Van Eynde-Neutens v European Parliament Arbitration clause
Reinder Kooyman og Petra Van Eynde-Neutens / Europa-Parlamentet Voldgiftsbestemmelse
Case C-434/97 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic Taxation
Sag T-164/98 Giuseppe Carraro / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-164/98 Giuseppe Carrara v Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag T-82/98 Frans Jacobs / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-82/98 Frans Jacobs v Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag T-171/98 Maria Adelina Biasutto / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-171/98 Maria Adelina Biasutto v Council of the European Union Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag C-58/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
Case C-58/99 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
Sag C-46/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
Case C-264/99 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
Sag C-434/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik Fiskale bestemmelser
Case C-434/97 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic Taxation
»Traktatbrud — direktiv 92/12/EØF — særlige afgifter på stærk alkohol* (Femte Afdeling)
Directive 921121EEC — Specific tax levied on obligations content)
Artikel 3, stk. 2, i direktivet om punktafgifter har til formål at gøre det muligt for medlemsstaterne — ud over den minimumspunktafgift, der fastsættes i direktivet om afgiftsstrukturen — at fastsætte andre indirekte skatter i særligt øjemed, dvs. med et andet formål end et budgetmæssigt.
Article 3(2) of the excise duty directive is designed to allow the Member States to establish, in addition to the minimum excise duty fixed by the directive on structures, other indirect taxes having a specific purpose, that is to say, a purpose other than a budgetary purpose.
Ud over et særligt øjemed forudsætter den bemyndigelse, der således er givet medlemsstaterne, at bestemte regler for afgiftspålæggeise iagttages.
Apart from the need for a specific purpose, the enabling power thus conferred on the Member States requires compliance with certain tax rules.
Imidlertid er de sproglige versioner i to henseender forskellige på dette punkt.
However, the language versions of the directive diverge in two respects on this point.
Ved stævning, indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 22. december 1997, har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om at det fastslås, at Den Franske Republik ikke har overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til artikel 3, stk. 2, i Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF af 25. februar 1992 om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed (herefter »direktivet om punktafgifter«), navnlig sammenholdt med artikel 20 i Rådets direktiv 92/83/EØF af 19. oktober 1992 om harmonisering af punktafgiftsstrukturen for alkohol og alkoholholdige drikkevarer (herefter »direktivet om afgiftsstrukturen«), idet den har opretholdt bestemmelserne i artikel 26 i lov nr. 83-25 af 19. januar 1983 om anvendelsesområdet og afgiftsgrundlaget for den »socialsikringsafgift«, der opkræves af alkoholholdige drikkevarer.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 22 December 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by maintaining in force the provisions of Article 26 of Law No 83-25 of 19 January 1983 on the scope and tax base of the 'social security' contribution levied on alcoholic beverages, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products ('the excise duty directive'), read in conjunction with, in particular, Article 20 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages ('the directive on structures').
For det første opstilles der i kraft af anvendelsen af ordet »eller« i den franske, den italienske, den portugisiske, den spanske og den tyske version et alternativ mellem iagttagelsen af de fællesskabsregler for afgiftspålæggeise, der gælder for punktafgifter, og af dem, der gælder for moms, mens ordet »og« i den danske, den engelske, den finske, den græske, den nederlandske og den svenske version synes at forudsætte, at begge sæt regler iagttages.
First, in the German, Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese versions, the use of the word 'or' establishes an alternative between compliance with the Community tax rules applicable for excise duty purposes and compliance with those applicable for VAT purposes, whereas the term 'and' featuring in the English, Danish, Finnish, Greek, Dutch and Swedish versions appears to call for cumulative compliance with those rules.
For det andet foreskrives det i den danske, den engelske, den finske, den nederlandske, den portugisiske og den svenske version af direktivet om punktafgifter, at de regler for
While it acknowledged that the 'social security' contribution pursued a specific purpose within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the excise duty directive, the Commission took the view that its scope and tax base were not compatible with the structure of excise duties on alcohols and alcoholic beverages, as defined by the directive on structures.
afgiftspålæggeise, der gælder for punktafgifter og moms, skal iagttages. Derimod forpligter direktivet i den tyske version kun medlemsstaterne til at iagttage de principper for afgiftspålæggeisen, der gælder for punktafgifter eller moms.
In this regard, it follows both from a comparison of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 and of the third recital in the preamble to the excise duty directive, which envisages concomitantly the hypotheses contemplated by Article 3, that that directive is intended to prevent additional indirect taxes from improperly obstructing trade.
I den franske, den græske, den italienske og den spanske version af direktivet anvendes omskrivninger.
That would, in particular, be the case if traders were subject to formalities other than those provided for by the Community legislation on excise duty or VAT, in view of the fact that such formalities are liable to vary from one Member State to another.
Der må herefter tages stilling til de to klagepunkter, Kommissionen har fremført mod lov nr. 83-25, i lyset af disse overvejelser.
It is sufficient that the indirect taxes pursuing specific objectives should, on these points, accord with the general scheme of one or other of these taxation techniques as structured by the Community legislation.
Kommissionen har for det første kritiseret det forhold, at de franske afgifter ikke finder anvendelse på hele kategorien af alkoholholdige drikkevarer, således som den er defineret i direktivet om afgiftsstrukturen.
It is accordingly necessary to examine, in light of the foregoing considerations, the two complaints which the Commission has raised against Law No 83-25.
Efter artikel 3, stk. 2, i direktivet om punktafgifter kræves det imidlertid ikke på dette punkt, at de regler, for afgiftspålæggeise, der gælder for punktafgifter eller moms, iagttages.
The Commission first criticises the fact that the French charges do not apply to the category of alcoholic beverages, as defined by the directive on structures, in full.
Dette ville navnlig være tilfældet, hvis de erhvervsdrivende var underkastet andre formaliteter end dem, der er fastsat i fællesskabsbestemmelserne om punktafgifter eller moms, idet de ville kunne variere fra den ene medlemsstat til den anden.
Article 3(2) of the excise duty directive does not, on this point, demand compliance with the tax rules applicable for excise duty or VAT purposes.
For det andet har Kommissionen gjort gældende, at »socialsikringsafgiftens« størrelse er proportional med mængden af drikkevaren, uafhængigt af dens alkoholindhold.
Second, the Commission contends that the amount of the 'social security' contribution is proportionate to the quantity of beverage, irrespective of its alcohol content.
Under disse omstændigheder må det antages, at det efter artikel 3, stk. 2, i direktivet om punktafgifter ikke kræves, at medlemsstaterne skal iagttage alle de regler, der gælder for punktafgifter eller for moms med hensyn til bestemmelse af afgiftsgrundlaget, afgiftsberegning, afgiftens forfald og kontrol med
It should be pointed out that this tax base is consistent with the general scheme of the tax rules applicable for excise duty purposes.
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber betaler sagens omkostninger.*
Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs/
Generaladvokat A. Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Femte Afdeling') den 1. juli 1999.
Advocate General A. Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 1 July 1999.
Han foreslog Domstolen: r-
Court of First Instance
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber betaler sagens omkostninger.«
Following a succession of amendments, Regulation No 3094/86 was codified in Council Regulation (EC) No 894/97 of 29 April 1997 laying down certain technical measures for the conservation of fishery resources.
»Fiskeri — forordning (EF) nr. 1239198 — forbud mod drivgarn — annullationssøgsmål — afvisning* (Første Udvidede Afdeling)
The Court notes in the present case that the prohibition laid down in the contested regulation on the keeping on board or use of drift-nets for the capture of the species set out therein after 1 January 2002 applies without distinction to any vessel which is flying the flag of a Member State and is currently using drift-nets in the fishing areas specified, or is likely to do so.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Under those circumstances it is possible that owners of vessels other than the applicants, who
3) Intervenienterne afholder deres egne omkostninger.*
Orders the interveners to bear their own costs.'
Sag T-171/98 Maria Adelina Biasutto / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-171/98 Maria Adelina Biasutto ν Council of the European Union
•Personalesag* (Femte Afdeling)
Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag T-22/99 Gustave Rose / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-22/99 Gustave Rose ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Forenede sager T-223/97 og T-17/98 Reinder Kooyman og Petra Van Eynde-Neutens / Europa-Parlamentet Voldgiftsbestemmelse
Joined Cases T-223/97 and T-17/98 Reinder Kooyman and Petra Van Eynde-Neutens ν European Parliament Arbitration clause
Sag T-164/98 Giuseppe Carraro / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-164/98 Giuseppe Carraro ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Personalesag* (Anden Afdeling)
(Officials — Staff report — Action for annulment — Action for damages) (Second Chamber)
Sag T-82/98 Frans Jacobs / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-82/98 Frans Jacobs ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag T-145/98 ADT Projekt Gesellschaft der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tierzüchter mbH / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Forbindelserne udadtil
Case T-145/98 ADT Projekt Gesellschaft der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tierzüchter mbH ν Commission of the European Communities External relations
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The first plea, that the application does not comply with formal requirements
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
On 1 October 1997 the Commission informed the applicant that it was interested in its tender but wished to obtain clarification on some points in the technical proposal.
2) I øvrigt frifindes Kommissionen.
On 8 January 1998 the Commission criticised Mr Cherekaev for awarding unusual marks in the evaluation procedure of 9 and 10 July 1997.
3) Sagsøgeren betaler sagens omkostninger*
On 9 January 1998 it informed the applicant that the hearings for evaluation of the tenders would take place on 4 and 5 March 1998.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Fjerde Afdeling) den 22. februar 2000.
In support of its claim for annulment the applicant puts forward a single plea in law, alleging infringement of the rules relating to tendering procedures and of the principle of 'fair competition'.
Sag C-58/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
The applicant submits in particular that the Commission infringed the obligation imposed by the principle of 'fair competition' to be seen to be impartial, and to conduct the tendering procedure in a lawful manner.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The applicant claims that it has accordingly suffered harm equivalent to the loss of profit, estimated at DEM 550 000, consequent upon the award of the project to another tenderer or, at the very least, to the cost of drawing up its tender, assessed at DEM 225 250, an amount which it itemises in its reply.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — traktatens artikel 52,59 og 73 B (nu artikel 43, 49 og 56 EF) —privatisering af aktieselskaber — Finansministeren tillagt »særlige beføjelser* — privatisering af ENI og Telecom Italia
On this issue, the Court notes that the Commission has a broad discretion with regard to the factors to be taken into account for the purpose of deciding to award a contract following an invitation to tender.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum") den 22. februar 2000.
In the present case, the minutes of the meeting of the evaluation committee on 9 and 10 July 1997 show that, of the eight competing tenderers, only two obtained, for the technical section of their tender, an average mark above 65 points, the threshold for qualifying for the financial evaluation.
Sag C-16/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
In that regard, as the Commission points out, the Court may not, in the exercise of its jurisdiction, issue directions to the Community institutions or assume the role assigned to them.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende overholdelse af artikel 4, stk 2, artikel 14, stk 1, stk 10 og stk 13 samt artikel 21, 24 og 25 i direktiv 93/38/EØF af 14. juni 1993 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved tilbudsgivning inden for vand- og energiforsyning samt transport og telekommunikation — elektrificerings- og vejbefysningsarbejder i Vendée-departementet
In those circumstances, the Commission had good grounds, in order to restore equal treatment and, thereby, equality of opportunity for all the tenderers, which it is bound to ensure at each stage of a tendering procedure, for cancelling the evaluation procedure of 9 and 10 July 1997 and organising a fresh one, open to the same tenderers as those who had competed in the first evaluation procedure, while ensuring that the recipient of the project was represented in that second evaluation procedure by someone other than Mr Cherekaev.
Sag C-46/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
By proceeding in that way, the evaluation committee scrupulously observed the provisions in the Guidelines to be followed where the marks of one evaluator diverge significantly from those of the other members of the evaluation committee.
Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum') den 24. februar 2000.
Given, on the one hand, the wide divergence recorded between Mr Cherekaev's marks and those of the other evaluators, as well as between the marks awarded by Mr Cherekaev to the applicant and those which he awarded to the other tenderers, and, on the other, the lack of valid explanations on his part for those divergences, the Commission did not make a serious and manifest error of assessment when it took the view that Mr Cherekaev, in the evaluation procedure of 9 and 10 July 1997, he had not displayed the impartiality required in that kind of procedure.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
As for the rest, it should be recalled, without it being necessary to rule on the admissibility, in the light of Article 48(2) of the Rules of
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—undladelse affristmæssigt at træffe de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendigefor at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 93/104/EF af 23. november 1993 om visse aspekter i forbindelse med tilrettelæggelse af arbejdstiden
In support of its claim for damages, the applicant alleges that the Commission carried out the procedure for awarding the contract relating to Project FD RUS 9603 in an unlawful manner.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling') den 22. februar 2000.
It is apparent, however, from the consideration of the claim for annulment that the Commission did not, in the course of the tendering procedure for Project FD RUS 9603, commit any irregularity capable of rendering it liable to the applicant.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Dismisses the remainder of the application as unfounded;
Sag C-264/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
Case C-58/99 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—EF-traktatens artikel 12,43 og 49 (tidtigere artikel 6, 52 og 59 EF) -virksomheden som speditør — national ordning der indeholder krav om indskrivning i virksomhedsregistre — ordning som hjemler straf, hvis denne betingelse ikke overholdes
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Articles 52, 59 and 73b of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 43, 49 and 56 EC) — Privatisation of public limited companies —
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum") den 24. februar 2000.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 24 February 2000.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenumi den 24. februar 2000.
declare that, by failing, in the course of the procurement procedure issued by the Syndicat Départemental d'Électrification de la Vendée in December 1994 for the award of contracts for electrification work:
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 22 February 2000.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 22 February 2000.
Sag C-205/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Republikken Østrig
Case C-16/98 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic
Generaladvokat A. Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum1) den
Case C-168/98 Grand Duchy of Luxembourg ν European Parliament Council of the European Union
Præjudiciel — Cour de Cassation — fortolkning af artikel 15b, stk 8, i Rådets forordning nr. 1035/72 af 18. maj 1972 om den fælles markedsordningfor frugt oggrønsager—medlemsstaternes mulighed for at lade visse regler om produktion og afsætning som er fastsat af enproducentorganisation omfatte ikke-ttlstuttede producenter — medlemsstaternes mulighed for at gøre undtagelse til deres beslutning om udvidelse af anvendelsesområdet for disse regler
Preliminary ruling — House of Lords — Interpretation of Art. 12(1)(b) of Council Directive 77/93/EEC of 21 December 1976 on protective measures against the introduction into the Member States of harmful organisms of plants or plant products — Citrus fruits comingfrom a non-member country other than the one of origin — Citrus fruits from the part of Cyprus north of the United Nations buffer zone
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling') den 24. februar 2000.
Advocate General D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 24 February 2000.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling") den 24. februar 2000.
Advocate General A. Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 24 February 2000.