natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Verdonck m.fl. gjorde til deres forsvar navnlig gældende, at 1990-loven er uforenelig med direktiv 89/592.
In their defence, the defendants argued, inter alia, that the 1990 Law is inconsistent with Directive 89/592 in that, by laying down a more stringent definition of insider dealing than the directive, whilst at the same time providing that information in the possession of holding companies does not amount to inside information for the purposes of the offence of insider dealing, the 1990 Law contravenes Article 6 of Directive 89/592, which authorises the Member States to adopt more stringent provisions than those laid down in the directive only if such provisions are applied generally.
Når 1990-loven definerer insider handel på en strengere måde end direktivet, mens det samtidig præciseres, at den viden, som holdingselskaber besidder, ikke udgør intern viden, der kan omfattes af bestemmelserne om en sådan overtrædelse, tilsidesætter loven artikel 6 i direktiv 89/592, der kun tillader medlemsstaterne at fastsætte strengere bestemmelser end dem, der er foreskrevet i direktivet, såfremt de pågældende bestemmelser finder almindelig anvendelse.
On 5 March 1996, Ter Beke and Unilever signed a letter of intent, made public on the same day, in which they expressed their wish to continue their existing discussions on an exclusive basis. Between 5 March 1996 and 18 March 1996, following the publication of the letter of intent, the price of shares in Ter Beke rose from BEF 2 800 to BEF 3 230, an increase of 15.3%.
Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Gent finder, at straffesagens afgørelse afhænger af fortolkningen af artikel 6 i direktiv 89/592, og har derfor
Taking the view that judgment in the case depended on the interpretation of Article 6 of Directive 89/592, the Rechtbank van Eerste Aanleg te Gent stayed the proceedings and referred three questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Den 5. marts 1996 undertegnede Ter Beke og Unilever en hensigtserklæring, der blev offentliggjort samme dag, hvori de udtrykte ønske om at fortsætte de igangværende drøftelser mellem dem uden at inddrage andre.
On 14 May 1996, Ter Beke and Unilever signed an acquisition agreement relating to Chilled Food Business.
Den forelæggende ret ønsker med sine to første spørgsmål, der skal behandles samlet, nærmere bestemt at få oplyst, om artikel 6 i direktiv 89/592 skal fortolkes således, at den ikke er til hinder for, at der anvendes bestemmelser i en medlemsstats lovgivning, der er strengere end dem, der er fastsat i dette direktiv for så vidt angår forbuddet mod at udnytte intern viden, idet der dog fastsættes en definition af intern viden, der undtager en bestemt type viden, som holdingselskaber er i besiddelse af.
By its first two questions, which can be considered together, the national court is asking essentially whether Article 6 of Directive 89/592 is to be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from applying legislative provisions on the prohibition of use of inside information which are more stringent than those laid down by that directive but which at the same time exclude a certain category of information in the possession of holding companies from the definition of inside information contained in that legislation.
Det tilkommer den forelæggende ret at fastlægge, om de præciseringer, lovgiver har indført i 1990-lovens artikel 181 om den viden, der besiddes af holdingselskaber, sammenholdt med samtlige de bestemmelser i national ret, der regulerer denne artikels anvendelse, medfører, at omfanget af den viden, der betragtes som intern for holdingselskaber, begrænses i forhold til omfanget af den viden, der betragtes som intern i henhold til den almindelige definition heraf, som den samme bestemmelse giver.
national legislature in Article 181 of the 1990 Law with regard to information in the possession of holding companies, read in conjunction with all the provisions of national law determining the application of that provision, result in making the information regarded as inside information in the case of holding companies more restricted than the information regarded as inside information for the purposes of the general definition contained in Article 181.
Den forelæggende ret kan således afgøre, om holdingselskaber og de personer, der har adgang til holdingselskabernes viden, omfattes af en mere gunstig ordning end de andre aktører på de finansielle markeder i forhold til forbuddet mod at anvende intern viden, som defineret i direktiv 89/592, og navnlig i forhold til de ved 1990-loven indførte bestemmelser, der er strengere end de i direktivet fastsatte.
In so doing, the national court will thus be able to determine whether or not holding companies and persons having access to information possessed by them are more favourably treated than other participants in the financial market in so far as concerns the prohibition on using inside information as defined by Directive 89/592 and, in particular, in so far as concerns the provisions of the 1990 Law which are more stringent than those set out in the directive.
Det bemærkes indledningsvis, at Domstolen inden for rammerne af anvendelsen af traktatens artikel 177 ikke har kompetence til at afgøre, om en national bestemmelse er forenelig med fællesskabsretten, eller til at fortolke nationale ved lov eller administrativt fastsatte bestemmelser. Den er dog beføjet til at forsyne den nationale ret med alle under fællesskabsretten henhørendefortolkningsbidrag, som gør det muligt for denne ret at vurdere de nævnte forskrifters forenelighed med fællesskabsbestemmelserne.
Under Article 2(1) of Directive 89/592, the Member States must prohibit any person who, by virtue of his duties, profession or holding in the capital of an issuer possesses inside information from taking advantage of that information with full knowledge of the facts by acquiring or disposing of, for his own account or for the account of a third party, either directly or indirectly, transferable securities of the issuer or issuers to which that information relates.
Den forelæggende ret ønsker for det tilfælde, at nationale bestemmelser, der er strengere end dem, der er fastsat i direktiv 89/592, måtte være uforenelige med dette direktivs artikel 6, som følge af at de ikke finder anvendelse i almindelighed, nærmere bestemt at få oplyst, om disse strengere bestemmelser skal anses for at være ugyldige, eller om de skal anvendes over for samtlige aktører på de finansielle markeder, herunder over for dem, der er undtaget herfra i medfør af den nationale lovgivning, der er fundet uforenelig med direktivet.
In the event that the existence of provisions of national law more stringent than those laid down by Directive 89/592 is incompatible with Article 6 of that directive, by reason of the fact that they are not of general application, the national court asks essentially whether those more stringent provisions are to be regarded as not forming part of the national legislation or whether they must be applied to all participants in the financial markets, including those exempt from them under that national legislation.
Medlemsstaterne skal i henhold til artikel 2, stk. 1, i direktiv 89/592 forbyde personer, der som følge af deres stilling, deres erhverv eller deres besiddelse af kapitalinteresser i et udstedende selskab er i besiddelse af en intern viden, direkte eller indirekte for egen eller tredjemands regning at erhverve eller afhænde værdipapirer i det eller de udstedende selskaber, som berøres af denne interne viden, idet de bevidst udnytter denne.
Article 6 of Directive 89/592 permits the Member States to adopt provisions more stringent than those laid down by the directive, provided that such provisions are applied generally.
Artikel 6 i direktiv 89/592 gør det bl.a. muligt for medlemsstaterne at fastsætte strengere bestemmelser end dem, der er foreskrevet i direktivet, forudsat at sådanne bestemmelser finder almindelig anvendelse.
Suffice it to observe in this connection that, if the provisions of the legislation of a Member State which are more stringent than those laid down by Directive 89/592 are incompatible with Article 6 of that directive, they are contrary to Community law and cannot therefore be applied to any participant in the financial markets.
2) Såfremt nationale bestemmelser saider mod artikel 6 i direktiv 89/592, som følge af at visse fysiske eller juridiske personer specifikt fritages for etforbud mod at udnytte intern viden, der er strengere, end det i dette direktiv fastsatte forbud, skal den nationale ret undlade at anvende disse strengere bestemmelser overfor samtlige de personer, som de kunne finde anvendelse på.«
ff provisions of national law run counter to Article 6 of Directive 89/592, by reason of the fact that certain natural or legal persons are specifically exempted from a more stringent prohibition of use ofinside information than that laid down by the directive, the national court must disappfy those more stringent provisions with regard to all persons to whom they might otherwise apply.'
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdelingi den 12. oktober 2000.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 12 October 2000.
»Artikel 6 i Rådets direktiv 89/592/EØF af 13. november 1989 om samordning af retsforskrifterne vedrørende insiderhandel er ikke til hinder for en national lovgivning som den i hovedsagen omhandlede, der for så vidt angår definitionen af forbuddet mod insiderhandel fastsætter strengere bestemmelser end dem, der er fastsat i direktivet, idet den dog udelukker den viden fra sit anvendelsesområde, som holdingselskaber besidder i anledning af den rolle, som de spiller ved ledelsen af selskaber, som de har andele i, når denne viden ikke er egnet til mærkbart at påvirke kursen på værdipapirer.«
'Article 6 of Council Directive 89/592/EEC, of 13 November 1989, coordinating regulations on insider dealing, does not preclude national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, as far as the definition of prohibited insider dealing is concerned, adopts provisions more stringent than those laid down by the Directive while excluding from its scope of application information which holding companies possess because of their role in the management of companies in which they have a shareholding, when that information is not likely to have a significant effect on the price of the transferable securities.'
Retten
Case T-159/98
»Tjenestemænd — udvælgelsesprøve — uregelmæssighed ved afviklingen af prøven, der kan fordreje dens udfald — søgsmålsinteresse« (Fjerde Afdeling)
(Officials — Competition — Irregularity in the conduct of the tests such as to distort the results — Locus standi) (Fourth Chamber)
Sag T-37/99 Ugo Miranda / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Ugo Miranda v Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — bosættelsespenge efterfratræden — begrebet bopæl« (En enkelt dommer)
(Officials — Resettlement allowance — Meaning of 'residence') (Single Judge)
»Tjenestemænd — udvælgelsesprøve — annullationssøgsmål—stopprøver —prøvernes afvikling — ligebehandlingsprincippet — begrundelsespligt —princippet om den berettigede forventning —princippet om godforvaltningsskik — konsekvenserfor udvælgelsesprøvens videre afvikling« (Anden Afdeling)
(Officials — Competitions —Actionfor annulment—Preselectionprocedure — Conduct of tests — Principle of equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of legitimate expectations — Principle of good management — Consequences for the final outcome of the competition) (Second Chamber)
Sag T-104/00 Giovanni Cubeta / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-104/00 Giovanni Cubeta ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd —placeringved et nyt tjenestested—bosættelsespenge —dagpenge—betingelser for tildeling«
(Officials — Posting to a new place of work — Installation allowance — Daily subsistence — Conditions for granting) (Single Judge)
Sag T-60/00 Paraskevi Liaskou / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-60/00 Paraskevi Liaskou ν Council of the European Union Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — vederlag — udlandstillæg — artikel 4, stk 1, litra a), i bilag VII til tjenestemandsvedtægten« (Fjerde Afdeling)
(Officials — Remuneration —Expatriation allowance —Article 4(1) (a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations) (Fourth Chamber)
SagT-99/00 Ignacio Samper / Europa-Parlamentet Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-99/00 Ignacio Samper ν European Parliament Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — genoprettelse af karriere — sammenligning af fortjenester — kriterier — ligebehandlingsprincippet« (Fjerde Afdeling)
(Officials — Drawing-up of career record — Examination of the comparative merits - Criteria — Principle of equal treatment) (Fourth Chamber)
Præjudiciel »Procesreglementets artikel 104, stk 3 — bananer —fælles markedsordning — GATT—direkte virkning — EF-traktatens artikel 234, stk 1 (efter ændring nu artikel 307, stk 1, EF)« (Domstolens plenum)
Preliminary ruling (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure —- Bananas — Common organisation of the market — GATT — Direct effect — First paragraph of Article 234 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, first paragraph of Article 307 EC)) (Full Court)
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Fjerde Afdeling") den 2. maj 2001.
In those circumstances, OGT brought proceedings in the Finanzgericht Hamburg for suspension of enforcement of the contested assessment pending a final decision of the Hauptzollamt on the substance of the objection.
Sag C-439/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
That question arose in proceedings between OGT Fruchthandelsgesellschaft mbH, a traditional importer of bananas from third countries, and Hauptzollamt (Principal Customs Office) Hamburg-St.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
The main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — undladelse af at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger for at gennemføre Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 98/4/EF af 16. februar 1998 om ændring af direktiv 93/38/EØF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved tilbudsgivning inden for vand· og energiforsyning samt transport og telekommunikation
In the context of the quota provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation No 404/93, as amended by Regulation No 1637/98, OGT in January 1999 imported 43.01 tonnes of fresh bananas from Ecuador.
Den Franske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 98/4/EF af 16. februar 1998 om ændring af direktiv 93/38/EØF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved tilbudsgivning
'Is the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1637/98, inapplicable on the ground of breach of Articles I and XIII of GATT (1994), individuals being able to rely thereon in court proceedings?'
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 3. maj 2001.
Findings of the Court bananas, as introduced by Regulation No 404/93 and subsequently amended, is not designed to ensure the implementation in the Community legal order of a particular obligation assumed in the context of GATT, nor does it refer expressly to specific provisions of GATT.
inden for vand- og energiforsyning samt transport og telekommunikation, idet den ikke har vedtaget alle de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser for at efterkomme direktivet.
By its question the Finanzgericht is essentially asking whether Articles I and XIII of GATT 1994 are such as to create rights which individuals may rely on directly before a national court in order to oppose the application of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation No 404/93, as amended by Regulation No 1637/98.
Sag C-llO/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Republikken Østrig
The answer to that question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law, so that it is appropriate for the Court, in accordance with Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure, to give its decision by reasoned order.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende fristmæssig og fuldstændiggennemførelse inden for alle sektorer af Kommissionens direktiv 97/59/EF af 7. oktober 1997 om tilpasning til de tekniske fremskridt af Rådets direktiv 90/679/EØF om beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne mod farerne ved at være udsat for biologiske agenser under arbejdet (syvende særdirektiv i henhold til artikel 16, stk 1, i direktiv 89/39UEØF)
Moreover, even on the assumption that the first paragraph of Article 234 of the Treaty is applicable to GATT 1994 despite the fact that GATT 1994 is legally distinct from GATT 1947 under Article 11(4) of the WTO Agreement, differs significantly from the provisions of GATT 1947 and was concluded and approved by the Community by virtue of its exclusive competence, no direct effect of the provisions of GATT 1994 can be derived from the first paragraph of Article 234 of the Treaty.
Præjudiciel — College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — gyldigheden af artikel 3 i Kommissionens forordning nr. 1484/95 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til ordningen for tillægsimporttold og om fastsættelse af tillægsimporttold for fjerkrækød og æg samt ægalbumin og om ophævelse af forordning nr. 163/67/EØF — begrænsning af princippet i Rådets grundforordning nr. 2777175, hvorefter en eventuel tillægstold beregnespå grundlag afcif-importprisen — princippet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning
The Court has already held, first, in Case C-149/96 Portugal ν Council, that, having regard to their nature and structure, the WTO Agreement and the agreements and understandings annexed to it are not in principle among the rules in the light of which the Court is to review the legality of measures adopted by the Community institutions, pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 230 EC.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet f Sjette Afdeling) den 2. maj 2001.
Second, in Joined Cases C-300/98 and C-392/98 Dior and Others, the Court held that, for the same reasons as those set out in paragraphs 42 to 46 of the judgment in Portugal ν Council, the provisions of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, in Annex 1C to the WTO Agreement, are not such as to create rights on which individuals may rely directly before the courts by virtue of Community law.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
It follows that the same must apply, for the same reasons, to the provisions of GATT 1994.
Republikken Østrig har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Kommissionens direktiv 97/59/EF af 7. oktober 1997 om tilpasning til de tekniske fremskridt af Rådets direktiv 90/679/EØF om beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne mod farerne ved at være udsat for biologiske agenser under arbejdet (syvende særdirektiv i henhold til artikel 16, stk. 1, i direktiv 89/391/EØF), idet den ikke har vedtaget de nødvendige love og adrninistrative bestemmelser til at gennemføre direktivet.
It is true that, as the Court confirmed in paragraph 49 of Portugal ν Council, it also follows from the Court's case-law that where the Community intended to implement a particular obligation assumed in the context of GATT, or where the Community measure refers expressly to precise provisions of GATT, it is for the Court to review the legality of the Community measure in question in the light of the GATT rules.
Sag C-315/99 Ρ Ismeri Europa Sri / Revisionsretten for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
However, contrary to OGTs assertions, no such exceptional situation exists in the present case.
Sag C-417/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Spanien
The Court made the following order:
Traktatbrudssøgsmål - Rådets direktiv 96/62/EFaf 27. september 1996 om vurdering og styring af luftkvalitet — manglende udpegelse af de kompetente myndigheder eller organer, der skal gennemføre direktivet
'Articles I and XIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, in Annex 1A to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation, approved on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, by Council Decision 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994, are not such as to create rights which individuals may rely on directly before a national court in order to oppose the application of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market in bananas, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1637/98 of 20 July 1998.'
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 3. mai 2001.
OPINIONS telecommunications sectors, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
Generaladvokat C. Stix-Hackl fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 3. maj 2001.
Case C-439/00 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
2) order the French Republic to pay the costs.'
Sag C-67/99 Kommissionen for De Fællesskaber / Irland
Failure by a State to comply with its obligations — Failure to adopt the necessary measures in order to comply with Directive 98/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 93/38/EEC coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 3. maj 2001.
He proposed that the Court allow the Commission's application and, as a result:
Præjudiciel — Amtsgericht Tauberbischofsheim — fortolkning af Europa-Parlamentet og Rådets direktiv 96/71/EF om udstationering af arbejdstagere som led i udveksling af tjenesteydelser, subsidiært fortolkningen af EF-traktatens artikel 59 (nu artikel 49 EF) — national lovgivning hvorefter de nationale mindstelønninger gælder obligatorisk for arbejdstagere, der er udstationeret i en anden stat som led i udvekslingen af tjenesteydelser — mulighed for virksomhederne i den pågældende medlemsstat for at indgå kollektive overenskomster med et lavere lønniveau end det generelle niveau for mindstelønninger — hensyn til almenvellet, som kan begrunde en indskrænkning i den frie udveksling af tjenesteydeber — beskyttelse af byggesektoren — bekæmpelse afarbejdsløsheden arbejdsløsheden
Preliminary ruling — College van Beroep voor her Bedrijfsleven — Validity of Article 3 of Commission Regulation No 1484/95 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixing additional import duties in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and repealing Regulation No 163/67/EEC — Restriction imposed on the principle set out in the basic regulation (Council Regulation No 2777/75) that additional duty is based on the cif import price — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
Sag C-71/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland
Advocate General P. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 2 May 2001.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål —påstand om tilsidescetteke af artikel 4, stk 1, i Rådets direktiv 92/43¡EØF om bevaring af naturtyper samt vilde dyr og planter — manglende fremsendelse til Kommissionen af en fuldstændig liste over områder og en fuldstændig liste over arter
declare that, by not adopting all the necessary laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 98/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 amending Directive 93/38/EEC coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 3. maj 2001.
Advocate General L.A. Geelhoed delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 3 May 2001.
Kommissionen for Fællesskaber frifindes.
Case C-315/99 Ρ Ismeri Europa Sri ν Court of Auditors of the European Communities