natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Blandt disse afgorelser vil man ogsä huske Eurostock Meat Marketing-sagen(dom af 5.12.2000, sag C-477198, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser),som er en af sagerne i forbindelse med bovin spongiform encephalopati-krisen.I medfsr af direktiv 89l662lEgF om veterinrerkontroli samhandelen i Frellesskabet med henblik pä gennemforelse af det indre marked havde Kommissionen i juli 1997 vedtaget en beslutning, der forbsd enhveranvendelse af specificeret risikomateriale med hensyn til overfsrbarespongiforme encephalopatier, nemlig for sä vidt angik kvregkranium, mandlerog rygmarv fra kveegpä over tolv mäneder. Denne liste omfattede ikkekindksd.
The case of Emsland-Stärke, concerning abuses in the area of export refunds onagricultural products, should also be mentioned (udgment of 14 December 2000in CaseC-l10/99). In that case, the Court held that a Community exporter canforfeit his right to payment of a non-differentiatedexport refund if (a) the productin respect of which the export refund was paid, and which is sold to a purchaserestablishedin a nonmember country, is, immediately after its release for homeuse in that nonmember country, transportedback to the Community under theexternal Community transit procedure and is there released for home use onpayment of import duties, without any infringement being established and (b) thatoperation constitutes an abuse on the part of that Community exporter.
I december 1997, dvs. nogle dage efter den fsrste udsrettelse afikrafttrredelsesdatoen for beslutningen, vedtog Department for Agriculture for Northern Ireland som en del af sit program til bekrmpelse af risikoen forbovin spongiform encephalopati en bekendtgorelse, der forbsd indforsel til Nordirland af specificeret risikomateriale fra kvregpä over tolv mäneder, derblev slagtet eller dsde uden for Det Forenede Kongerige, og allelevnedsmidler, der indeholder sädant materiale.
Evidenceof this must be placed before the national court in accordance with the rules ofnational law, for instance by establishing that there was collusion between thatexporter and the importer of the goods into the nonmember country.
Listen over specificeretrisikomateriale i henhold til bekendtgsrelsen var den samme som i Kommissionens beslutning 9715341F.F. I medfsr af l997-bekendtgorelsenbeslaglagde og forkastede ministeriet et parti kvreghoveder, der var indfsrt fra Irland af et selskab, der beskrftiger sig med afskrering af kindksd tillevnedsmidler, med den begrundelse, at partiet indeholdt specificeretrisikomateriale. Selskabet gjorde geldende, at I997-bekendtgorelsen udgjordeen foranstaltning med tilsvarende virkning som en kvantitativ restriktion for defrie varebevaegelser i strid med EF-traktatens artikel 30, og at det drejede sigom en foranstaltning, der ikke var berettiget eller tilladt i henhold tilfellesskabsretten. Ministeriet gjorde heroverfor greldende, at indfsrslenaf detpägreldende parti kunne forbydes som en sikkerhedsforanstaltning, der vartilladt i henhold til direktiv 891662.
The factthat, before being reimported into the Community, the product was sold by thepurchaser established in the nonmember country concerned to an undertakingalso established in that country with which he has personal and commercial links,is one of the facts which can be taken into account by the national court whenascertaining whether the conditions giving rise to an obligation to repay refundsare fulfilled.
Domstolen tilsluttede sig denne fortolkningaf de omhandlede frellesskabsbestemmelser og bemrerkede, at enbestemmelsesmedlemsstat i henhold til direktiv 891662,när tungtvejendehensyn til menneskers og dyrs sundhed taler herfor, kan trreffesikkerhedsforanstaltninger, indtil Kommissionen har truffet de foranstaltninger,der skal trreffes.Kommissionens vedtagelse af en beslutning, der ikke finderomgäende anvendelse, kan ikke i sig selv anses for at indebrereet forbud mod,
The Courtnoted that the principle of nondiscrimination laid down in Article 48 of the ECTreaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) was drafted in general terms and
at en medlemsstat selv treffer sikkerhedsforanstaltninger i henhold til direktiv891662. Formälet med dette direktiv er nemlig at indfsre en fellesskabsretlig beskyttelsesordning, der skal erstattede eventuelt uensartede hastesikkerhedsforanstaltninger, som medlemsstaterne har truffet i tilfelde afalvorlig fare.
was not specifically addressed to the Member States.
Det er imidlertid forst, när sädanne frellesskabsretligebestemmelser er vedtaget,trädt i kraft og finder anvendelse pä de pägeldendeprodukter, at der er risiko for en konflikt mellem disse bestemmelser og desikkerhedsforanstaltninger, der forudgäende er truffet af medlemsstaterne.
An obligation requiring candidates to a recruitment competition to prove their linguisticknowledge only by means of one particular bilingualism certificate issued in asingle province of a Member State put nationals of the other Member States at adisadvantage, given that persons not residing in that provincehad little chance ofacquiring the certificate and it would be difficult, or even impossible, for themto gain access to the employment in question.
Ennational foranstaltning som l997-bekendtgorelsen, der forbyder indforsel af altspecificeret risikomateriale, men ligeledes ethvert levnedsmiddel, derindeholder specificeret risikomateriale, var berettiget i henhold til direktiv891662 og var en foranstaltning, der stod i rimeligt forhold til den fare, somden eventuelle overfsrsel af bovin spongiform encephalopati udgjorde.Indfsrsel af kvreghovederkunne forbydes,da de indeholdt strerkt smittefarligtmateriale, og da der pä grund af bäde slagtemetoderne og transportenvar enstor risiko for kontaminationaf sundtv & v. v & v.
Even thoughobliging an applicantfor a post to have a certain level of linguistic knowledge could be legitimate andpossession of a diploma, such as the certificate at issue here, could constitute acriterion for assessing that knowledge, the fact that it was impossibleto submitproof of the required linguistic knowledge by any other means,in particular byequivalent qualifications obtained in other Member States,had to be considereddisproportionate in relation to the aim in view. The requirement in questiontherefore constituted discrimination on grounds of nationality contrary to Article 48 of the Treatv.
Med hensyn til misbrug vedrorende eksportrestitutionerfor landbrugsprodukterbsr man ligeledes n & vne Emsland-Stärke-sagen (dom af L4.12.2000, sag C-Il0l99, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser).
Case C-190/98 Graf Qldgment of 27 January 2000) related to Austrian legislationdenying a worker entitlement to compensation on termination of employment if he terminates his contract of employmenthimself in order to take up employmentwith a new employer established in that Member State or in another Member State, but granting entitlement to such compensation if the contract ends withoutthe termination being at the worker's own initiative or attributable to him.
Konstateringenaf, at der er taleom misbrug, forudsretter,at der hos eksportsreni Frellesskabet bestär et snskeom at drage fordel af fellesskabsbestemmelserne ved kunstigt at skabebetingelserne for opnäelse heraf.
The legislationapplies irrespectiveof the nationality of the worker concerned and does not affectmigrant workers to a greater extent than nationalworkers. workers.
Beviset herfor skal fsres for den nationale reti overensstemmelse med nationale retsregler, f.eks. ved at fastsläen hemmeligaftale mellem eksportoren og importoren af varen i tredjelandet.
lI.2.In CaseC-356198 Kaba (udgment of 11 April 2000), the applicant, marriedto a migrant worker who was a national of a Member State, had been refusedindefinite leave to remain in another Member State because he had not previouslyresided there for four years.
Denomstendighed, at produktet, inden det genindfortestil Fallesskabet,er blevetsolgt af den i det pägreldende tredjeland etableredeksber til en virksomhed,der ligeledes er etableret i dette land, og som han er personligt og okonomiskforbundet med, er et af de faktiske elementer, som den nationale ret kan tagei betragtning for at efterprove, om betingelserne for, at der er en forpligtelsetil tilbagebetaling af restitutionerne, er opffldt.
Pointing out that the legislation of the second Staterequired prior residence of only 12 months for the spouses of persons settled inits territory, which persons are not subject to any restriction on the period forwhich they may remain there, the applicant contended before the national court that such legislation constituted discrimination contrary to Regulation No 1612168on freedom of movement for workers within the Community. tz The Court
11.1.I Angones€-sagen(domaf 6.6.2000, sag C-281198,endnuikke trykti Samling af Afgarclser)anfregtede en italiensk statsborger, der havde tysk som mod er s mäI, og som var ansogertil en stilling i et pengeinstituti Italien, forden nationale ret kravet om, at han udelukkende gennem fremlreggelse af enattest udstedt i en bestemt italiensk provins skulle bevise, at han var tosproget(italiensk/tysk), sksnt det ikke blev bestridt,at han var fuldstrndig tosproget.Domstolen bemrerkede, at princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling i EF-traktatens artikel 48 (efter rendring nu artikel 39 EF) er formuleret ialmindelige vendinger og ikke specielter rettet til medlemsstaterne.
Thatsituation derives, first, from the provisions on the free movement of personscontained in Title III of Part Three of the EC Treaty and the secondary legislationadopted to give them effect and, second, from the provisions of Part Two of the Treaty, and more particularly Article 8a (now, after amendment, Article 18 EC),which, whilst granting citizensof the Union the right to move and reside freelywithin the Member States, expressly refers to the limitations and conditions laiddown by the Treaty and by the measures adopted to give it effect. The Member States are therefore entitled to rely on any objective difference there may bebetween their own nationals and those of other Member States when they laydown the conditions under which leave to remain indefinitely in their territory isto be granted to the spouses of such persons.
Det grelderderfor ogsä for arbejdsvilkär fastsat af privatpersoner.
Consequently, legislation such asthat at issue does not constitute discrimination contrary to Regulation No 1612168.
Kravet om, at anssgeretil en udvrelgelsesprsvemed henblik pä ansrettelsebeviser deressprogkundskaber alene gennem fremlreggelse af en attest for tosprogethed, derkun udstedes i 6n bestemtprovins i en medlemsstat, stiller statsborgere fra deovrige medlemsstater ringere, da personer, der ikke bor i denneprovins, kunhar fä mulighederfor at erhverve attesten,og det vil v & re vanskeligt ellerendog umuligt for dem at opnä den stilling, der er tale om.
Case C-357198Yiadom (udgment of 9 November 2000) concerned the positionof a Community national not in possession of a residence permit who had beentemporarily admitted to the territory of a Member Statemany months previouslyand was physically present there when the competent national authorities notifiedher of a decision prohibiting her from entering its territory for the purposes ofnational law.
Selv om det vilkunne v & re retmessigt over for en anssger til en stilling at stille krav omsprogkundskaber pä et vist niveau,og selv om besiddelse af et eksamensbevissom attesten kan v & re et kriterium for vurderingen af sädanne kundskaber, mädet forhold, at det ikke er muligt at fffie bevis for dem pä anden mäde, ognavnlig ved at godtgore, at tilsvarende kundskaber er erhvervet i andremedlemsstater, anses for at stä i et misforhold til det tilstrabte mäl.
The Court held that a legal fiction under national law, accordingto which a national who is physically present in the territory of the host MemberState is regarded as not yet having been the subject of a decision concerningentry, cannot result in that national being denied the procedural safeguards laiddown in Article 9 of Directive641221.13 641221.13
anvendelse uden hensyn til den pägreldende arbejdstagers nationalitet ogberorer ikke i hojere grad vandrende arbejdstagere end indenlandskearbejdstagere.
The Court held that, in order to benefit from the advantage afforded by thatprovision, an undertaking engaged in providing temporary personnel which, fromone Member State, makes workers available on a temporary basis to undertakingsbased in another Member State must normally carry on its activities in the first State.
Domstolenunderstregede, at opholdsretten for en medlemsstats statsborgere pä en andenmedlemsstats omräde pä frellesskabsrettens nuv & rende udviklingstrin ikke erubetinget.
That condition is satisfied where such an undertaking habitually carries onsignificant activities in the Member State in which it is established.
Dette folger dels af de bestemmelser om personers friebevegelighed, der er indeholdt i afsnit III i tredje del af traktaten, ogbestemmelserne i afledt ret til gennemforelse af disse,dels af bestemmelsernei anden del af traktaten, n & rmere bestemt traktatens artikel 8 A (efter endringnu artikel 18 EF), som tillregger unionsborgerne ret til at frerdesog opholdesig frit pä medlemsstaternes omräde, men samtidig udtrykkeligt henviser til debegrensninger og de betingelser, der er fastsat i traktaten og igennemforelsesbestemmelserne hertil.
The Courtalso held in this case that an E 101 certificate issued by the institution designatedby the competent authority of a Member State is binding on the social securityinstitutions of other Member States in so far as it certifiesthat workers posted byan undertaking providing temporary personnel are covered by the social securitysystem of the Member State in which that undertaking is established.
Medlemsstaterne har derfor ret til atdrage konsekvenserne af den objektive forskel, der kan bestämellem deresegne statsborgere og statsborgere fra andre medlemsstater, när de fastsretterbetingelserne for, at disse personers regtefreller kan meddeles tidsubegraensetopholdstilladelse til det nationale omräde. Folgelig indebar de omtvistedebestemmelser ikke en forskelsbehandling, som var i strid med forordning nr.
However,where the institutions of other Member Statesraise doubts as to the correctnessof the facts on which the certificate is based or as to the legal assessment of thosefacts and, consequently, as to the conformity of the information contained in thecertificate with Regulation No 1408171,the issuing institution must re-examinethe grounds on which the certificate was issued and, where appropriate, withdrawit.
Yiadom-sagen (dom af 9.11.2000, sag C-357198, endnu ikke trykt i Samlingaf Afgorelser) vedrsrte en EF-statsborgeruden opholdstilladelse,som fleremäneder forinden havde fäet midlertidig adgang til en medlemsstats omräde,og som fysisk befandt sig ddr, da de kompetente nationale myndighederunderrettede hende om en beslutning, der forbsd hendeat rejse ind i landet iden nationale lovgivnings forstand. Domstolen fastslog, at en juridisk fiktion
3811/86,which, for selfemployed persons, is the provision corresponding to thatat issue in Fl"S. Under that provision, a person normally selfemployed in theterritory of a Member State who performs work in the territory of anotherMember State is to continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipatedduration of the work does not exceed 12months.
Säfremt institutionerne i de ovrige medlemsstater imidlertidudtrykker tvivl med hensyn til rigtigheden af de faktiske omstrndigheder, derer lagt til grund for attesten,eller med hensyn til den retlige bedsmmelse afdisse faktiske omstendigheder og folgelig med hensyn til, om angivelserne iattesten er i overensstemmelse med forordning m. 1408171, skal denudstedende institution pä ny undersoge, om attesten er udstedt pä et korrektgrundlag, og efter omstrendighederne tilbagekalde den.
They therefore fell within thescope of Regulation No 1408 17 _BAR_ and constituted levies caught by the prohibitionagainst double contributions laid down by that regulation and by Articles 48 and52 of the Treaty which that regulation was designed to implement. Such aconclusion could not be affected by the specific detailed allocation of the sumslevied, the fact that payment of those contributions did not give entitlement to anydirect and identifiable benefit in return, the limited number of the workersconcerned or the minimal rate of the levies at issue.
Rädets direktiv 641221 lEgF af 25.2.1964om samordning af de saerlige foranstaltninger, som geelderfor udlrendingemed hensyn til rejse og ophold, og som er begrundet ihensynet til den offentligeorden, sikkerhed og sundhed (EFT 1963-1964,s. 109).
A national of a Member Stateworking in another Member State does not lose his status of worker withinthemeaning of Article a8(1) of the Treaty through occupying a post within aninternational organisation, even if the rules relating to his entry into and residencein the country in which he is employed are specifically governed by an
Banks-sagen (dom af 30.3.2000, sag C-178197, Sml.
international agreement.
I, s. 2005) vedrorte denbestemmelse i forordning (EOF) nr. 1408/71,som rendret og ajourfort senestved forordning nr. 3811186,som for selvstrendige erhvervsdrivende svarer til den bestemmelse, FTS-sagen vedrsrte.
The Court then stated that the first paragraph of Article 6 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, the first paragraph of Article 12 EC), which prohibits discrimination on grounds of nationality, alsoapplies in cases where a group or organisation, such as the hospitals group atissue, exercises a certain power over individuals and is in a position to impose onthem conditions which adversely affect the exercise of the fundamental freedomsguaranteed under the Treaty.
I medfsr af denne bestemmelse er enperson, der normalt har selvstendig beskreftigelse pä en medlemsstats omräde, og som udfsrer et arbejde pä en anden medlemsstats omräde, fortsat omfattetaf lovgivningen i fsrstnrevnte medlemsstat, forudsatat varigheden af dettearbejde ikke päregnesat overstige6t är.
The Court found that the criterion of affiliation tothe national social security scheme, on which the differentiation of fees formedical and hospital care was based, constituted indirect discrimination on theground of nationality.
Domstolen fastslog, at ordet arbejdei denne bestemmelse omfatter enhver arbejdsydelse, hvad enten der er tale omlsnnet eller selvstendigt arbejde. Med hensyn til E lOl-blanketten holdt Domstolen sig til afgorelsen i FT,S-dommen.
First, the great majority of those affiliated to the SicknessInsurance Scheme common to the Institutions of the European Communities andnot to the national social security scheme, although in receipt of medical andhospital care given in national territory, were nationals of other Member States.Second, the overwhelmingmajority of residents who were nationals were coveredby the national social security scheme.
Desuden fastslog den, at der inteter til hinder for, at en blanket E 101 i givet fald har tilbagevirkende kraft.
The Court then stated that theconsiderable difference in treatment between persons affiliated to the nationalsocialsecurity scheme and EC officials, in respect of the scalesof fees forhealthcare connectedwith childbirth, was not justified.
I andre sager traf Domstolen afgorelse vedrsrende visse aspekter af nationalebestemmelser vedrsrende social sikring set direkte i forhold til traktatensbestemmelser.
The Court accordinglyruled that the application, on a unilateral basis, by a group of healthcare providersof a Member State to EC officials of scalesof fees for medical and hospitalmaternity care which are higher than those applicable to residents affiliated to thenational social security scheme of that State constitutes discrimination on theground of nationality prohibited under the first paragraph of Article 6 of the Treaty, in the absence of objective justification in this respect.
Engelbrecht-sagen(dom af 26.9.2000, sag C-262197, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgarelser) vedrsrte samtidig udbetaling af pensioner tilkendt ihenhold til lovgivningen i forskellige medlemsstater.
Finally, in Case C-I35199 Elsen (udgment of 23 November 2000) the Courtconsidered whether the competent institution of a Member State is required, forthe purpose of the grant of an old-age pension, to take into account periodsdevoted to child-rearing completed in another Member State as though they hadbeen completed in national territory.
Domstolen fastslog, atsäfremt en arbejdstager mister en social fordel eller denne begrrenses blot somfolge af, at der tages hensyn til, at hans regtefrellemodtager en ydelse afsarnme art i medfsr af en anden medlemsstats lovgivning, i en situation, hvortildelingen af denne sidste ydelse for det fsrste ikke har medfsrt en forhojelseaf familiens samlede indtregter, og for det andet er ledsagetaf en tilsvarendenedsrettelse af arbejdstagerens egen pension i medfsr af lovgivningen i sammemedlemsstat, er dette en hindring for arbejdskraftens frie bevegelighed indenfor Frellesskabet.
The question was asked with regard inparticular to a personwho, at the time when the child was born, was a frontierworker employed in the territory of the Member State to which the institutionconcerned belonged and residing in the territory of the other State.
Et sädant resultat vil aftrolde EF-arbejdstagere fra at udsvederes ret til fri bevregelighed og er derfor en hindring for dennefrihed, somer fastsläet i traktatens artikel 48.
The Courtfound that to answer the question in the negative would disadvantage Communitynationals who have exercised their right to move and residefreely in the Member States , as guaranteedin Article 8a of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment,Article 18 EC).
De to sager Kommissionen mod Frankrig (domme af 15 .2.2000, sag C-34l98og sag C-169198, Sml. I, s. 995 og 1049)var anlagt af Kommissionen medpästand om, at det fastsloges,at Den Franske Republik havde tilsidesat deforpligtelser, der pähvilede den i henhold til forordning nr. 1408171 ogtraktatens artikel 48 og 52 (efter rndring nu artikel 39 EF og 43 EF), idet dendels havde opkrrvet et bidrag til drekning af underskuddetpä de socialesikringsordninger (CRDS), dels et generelt socialsikringsbidrag (SCG) aferhvervsindtagter og indkomstsurrogaterfor arbejdstagere og selvstendige erhvervsdrivende, der er bosat i Frankrig, men [som arbejder i en andenmedlemsstat ogl som i medfsr af nrevnte forordning ikke er omfattet af den
It also noted that a number of provisions of Regulation No1408171 which concern this type of situationhelp to ensure freedom of movementnot only for workers, but also for citizensof the Union, within the Community.The Court accordingly gave a positive answer to the question raised, intepretingthe provisions of the EC Treaty directly.
Domstolen gav Kommissionen medhold ogfastslog, at begge bidrag specifikt og direkte anvendes til finansiering af densociale sikring i denne stat.
The cases of Deliäge and Corsten may be noted in particular.
Folgelig er de omfattet af anvendelsesomrädet for forordning nr. L408171og mä anses for bidrag, der er omfattet af forbuddetmod dobbelt bidrag i forordningen og af traktatens artikel 48 og 52, somforordningen tilsigter at gennemfore.
The important judgment of 11 April 2000 in Joined Cases C-5L196 and C-I 9 I _BAR_ 97 Deliöge enabledthe Court to define the scope of its judgment in Case C-415193
For de samme ydelser skulle der betales 71 ,43% mere end den tarif, der gfaldt for personer omfattet af dennationale sygesikringsordning.
Relying in particular on Bosman, the Court pointed out that the Treatyprovisions concerning the freedom to provide services may apply to sportingactivities and to the rules laid down by sports associations such as the selectionrules referred to above.
Domstolen fastslog forst, at der ikke er nogen tvivl om, at tjenestemrnd ved De Europeiske Frellesskaber er vandrendearbejdstagere.
Those provisions not only apply to the action of publicauthorities but extend also to rules of any other nature aimed at regulating gainfulemployment and the provision of services in a collectivemanner.