natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I det forehggende tilfælde tillod de nationale myndigheder, at der skete begrænsninger i en af de grundlæggende friheder, der garanteres ved traktaten, med henvisning til, at det var nødvendigt at respektere de grundlæggende rettigheder, der garanteres ved EMRK samt ved den pågældende medlemsstats forfatning.
Consequently, heavy goods vehicles which should have used the Brenner motorway were immobilised from 09.00 hrs on Friday 12 June 1998. The motorway was reopened to traffic on Saturday 13 June 1998 at approximately 15.30 hrs, subject to the prohibition on the movement of lorries in excess of 7.5 tonnes during certain hours on Saturdays and Sundays applicable under Austrian legislation.
I denne forbindelse bemærkes, at de frie varebevægelser på den ene side ganske vist udgør et af de grundlæggende principper i traktatsystemet, men at denne frihed ikke desto mindre kan indskrænkes af de grunde, som er anført i traktatens artikel 36 eller med henvisning til tvingende hensyn til almenhedens interesse i overensstemmelse med den faste praksis, som Domstolen har udviklet siden dommen af 20. februar 1979 i Rewe-Zentral-sagen', den såkaldte »Cassis de Dijon«-dom (sag 120/78).
Schmidberger brought an action before the Landesgericht Innsbruck (Innsbruck Regional Court) (Austria) seeking damages of ATS 140 000 against the Republic of Austria on the basis that five of its lorries were unable to use the Brenner motorway for four consecutive days because, first, Thursday 11 June 1998 was a bank holiday in Austria, whilst 13 and 14 June 1998 were a Saturday and Sunday, and second, the Austrian legislation prohibits the movement of lorries in excess of 7.5 tonnes most of the time at weekends and on bank holidays. That motorway is the sole transit route for its vehicles between Germany and Italy.
På den anden side kan de grundlæggende rettigheder, der er genstand for hovedsagen, det vil sige ytringsog forsamlingsfriheden, til trods for, at de udtrykkeligt anerkendes i EMRK og udgør en af grundpillerne i et demokratisk samfund, begrænses, hvis hensynet til den almene interesse kræver det, hvilket fremgår af selve ordlyden af denne konventions artikel 10, stk. 2, og artikel 11, stk. 2.
Having found that Schmidberger had not shown either that its lorries would have had to use the Brenner motorway on 12 and 13 June 1998 or that it had not been possible, after it had become aware that the demonstration was due to take place, to change its routes in order to avoid loss, the Landesgericht Innsbruck dismissed the action by judgment of 23 September 1999.
Under disse omstændigheder skal de forehggende interesser afvejes mod hinanden med henblik på at fastslå, under hensyn tU samtlige omstændigheder i det konkrete tilfælde, om der er opnået en korrekt balance meUem disse.
Schmidberger then lodged an appeal against that judgment before the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck, which considers that it is necessary to have regard to the requirements of Community law where, as in the present case, claims are made which are, at least in part, founded on Community law.
Ikke desto mindre skal det undersøges, om de begrænsninger, der er gjort i samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet, er forholdsmæssige under hensyn til det forfulgte legitime formål, i nærværende sag beskyttelsen af grundlæggende rettigheder.
Considering that the resolution of the dispute thus required an interpretation of Community law, the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck decided to stay proceedings and refer a number of questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Dette var derimod ikke tilfældet i dom af 9. december 1997, Kommissionen mod Frankrig (sag C-265/95), hvüket fremgår af Domstolens bemærkninger.
It should be noted at the outset that the questions referred by the national court raise two distina, albeit related, issues.
Det er endvidere ubestridt, at den enkeltstående hændelse, der er tale om i nærværende sag, ikke gav anledning til en almen følelse af usikkerhed med negativ virkning for samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet i sin helhed, hvilket var tilfældet i forbindelse med de alvorlige og gentagne forstyrrelser af den offentlige orden, der var tale om i ovennævnte sag Kommissionen mod Frankrig.
First, the Court is asked to rule on whether the fact that the Brenner motorway was closed to all traffic for almost 30 hours without interruption, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, amounts to a restriction of the free movement of goods and must therefore be regarded as a breach of Community law.
Det følger heraf, at de nationale myndigheder under hensyn til det vide skøn, som de råder over på dette område, med rette vurderede, at nævnte demonstrations lovlige formål ikke kunne opnås ved foranstaltninger med mindre indgribende virkninger for samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet.
Second, the questions relate more specifically to the circumstances in which the liability of a Member State may be established in respect of damage caused to individuals as a result of an infringement of Community law.
»Den omstændighed, at en medlemsstats kompetente myndigheder ikke har forbudt en demonstration under omstændigheder som de, derforetigger i hovedsagen, er ikke uforenelig med EF-traktatens artikel 30 og 34 (efter ændring nu artikel 28 EF og 29 EF), sammenholdt med EF-traktatens artikel 5 (nu artikel 10 EF).*
Given that, logically, this second series of questions need be examined only if the first issue, as defined in the first sentence of the paragraph above, is answered in the affirmative, the Court must first give a ruling on the various points raised by that issue, which is essentially the subject of the first and fourth questions.
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 11. juli 2002. '
In the light of the evidence in the file of the main case sent by the referring court and the written and oral observations presented to the Court, those questions must be understood as seeking to determine whether the fact that the authorities of a Member State did not ban a demonstration with primarily environmental aims which resulted in the complete closure of a major transit route, such as the Brenner motorway, for almost 30 hours without interruption amounts to an unjustified restriction of the free movement of goods which is a fundamental principle laid down by Articles 30 and 34 of the Treaty, read together, if necessary, with Article 5 thereof.
Han foreslog Domstolen at svare således:
Whether there is a restriction of the free movement of goods
*— Når en sagsøger kan påvise, at han har lidt tab eller skade, som gennem en direkte årsagsforbindelse kan tilskrives en tilstrækkelig kvalificeret overtrædelse af en bestemmelse i fæUesskabsretten, som har til formål at tillægge borgeren rettigheder, har denne ret til erstatning fra staten.
In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, where the competent national authorities are faced with restrictions on the effective exercise of a fundamental freedom enshrined in the Treaty, such as the free movement of goods, which result from actions taken by individuals, they are required to take adequate steps to ensure that freedom in the Member State concerned even if, as in the main proceedings, those goods merely pass through Austria en route for Italy or Germany.
Et sådant tab eUer en sådan skade omfatter tab af mulighed for en fortjeneste, hvis alle øvrige betingelser for at opnå erstatning er opfyldt.
It should be added that that obligation of the Member States is all the more important where the case concerns a major transit route such as the Brenner motorway, which is one of the main land links for trade between northern Europe and the north of Italy.
Nationale bestemmelser, der begrænser mulighederne for at kræve erstatning for et sådant tab eller en sådan skade eUer gør det umuligt eller urimeligt vanskeligt for sagsøger at fastslå eksistensen eUer omfanget af en skade, må ikke anvendes.
In the light of the foregoing, the fact that the competent authorities of a Member State did not ban a demonstration which resulted in the complete closure of a major transit route such as the Brenner motorway for almost 30 hours on end is capable of restricting intra-Community trade in goods and must, therefore, be regarded as constituting a measure of equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction which is, in principle, incompatible with the Community law obligations arising from Articles 30 and 34 of the Treaty, read together with Article 5 thereof, unless that failure to ban can be objectively justified.
Når en sagsøger, selv om sådanne bestemmelser ikke findes, imidlertid ikke er i stand til at fastslå eksistensen af et tab eUer en skade, behøver den nationale ret, der behandler kravet, ikke at tage de øvrige fællesskabsretlige aspekter i betragtning.
In the present case, the national authorities relied on the need to respect fundamental rights guaranteed by both the ECHR and the Constitution of the Member State concerned in deciding to allow a restriction to be imposed on one of the fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Treaty.
En erstatning skal stå i passende forhold til det lidte tab, men kan beregnes på grundlag af et fast beløb, hvis det ikke er muligt nøjagtigt at fastsætte den økonomiske værdi af tabet.
The case thus raises the question of the need to reconcile the requirements of the protection of fundamental rights in the Community with those arising from a fundamental freedom enshrined in the Treaty and, more particularly, the question of the respective scope of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, guaranteed by Articles 10 and 11 of the ECHR, and of the free movement of goods, where the former are relied upon as justification for a restriction of the latter.
Den omstændighed, at en medlemsstat ikke har angivet i den nationale lovgivning, at bestemmelser i traktaten, som har direkte virkning, skal tages i betragtning, kan ikke udgøre en overtrædelse af fællesskabsretten.
First, whilst the free movement of goods constitutes one of the fundamental principles in the scheme of the Treaty, it may, in certain circumstances, be subject to restrictions for the reasons laid down in Article 36 of that Treaty or for overriding requirements relating to the public interest, in accordance with the Court's consistent case-law since the judgment in Case 120/78 Rewe-Zentral ('Cassis de Dijon') [1979].
Det specifikke formål med en lovlig pohtisk demonstration er uden betydning for afgørelsen af spørgsmålet, om den omstændighed, at medlemsstatens myndigheder har givet tilladelse til demonstrationen, udgør en tilstrækkelig kvalificeret overtrædelse af fællesskabsretten tü, at medlemsstaten ifalder erstatningsansvar.
Second, whilst the fundamental rights at issue in the main proceedings are expressly recognised by the ECHR and constitute the fundamental pillars of a democratic society, it nevertheless follows from the express wording of paragraph 2 of Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention that freedom of expression and freedom of assembly are also subject to certain limitations justified by objectives in the public interest, in so far as those derogations are in accordance with the law, motivated by one or more of the legitimate aims under those provisions and necessary in a democratic society.
Den nationale ret bør i lyset af omstændighederne i den foreliggende sag, som er fremlagt for Domstolen, fastslå, at tilladelsen,
In those circumstances, the interests involved must be weighed having regard to all the circumstances of the case in order to determine whether a fair balance was struck between those interests.
— med henblik på at give borgere mulighed for at udøve deres ret til ytringsfrihed og forsamlingsfrihed,
Nevertheless, it is necessary to determine whether the restrictions placed upon intra-Community trade are proportionate in the light of the legitimate objective pursued, namely, in the present case, the protection of fundamental rights.
— til en demonstration, som viUe spærre én ud af flere vigtige transitstrækninger gennem Alperne i et tidsrum på 28 timer ved en enkelt lejlighed,
As regards the main case, it should be emphasised at the outset that the circumstances characterising it are clearly distinguishable from the situation in the case giving rise to the judgment in Case C-265/95 Commission ν France [1997], referred to by Schmidberger as a relevant precedent in the course of its legal action against Austria.
— idet der på forhånd blev truffet de fornødne foranstaltninger til at sikre, at denne afbrydelse af godstransporten ikke blev unødigt omfattende, uden derved at fratage demonstrationen dens virkning, ikke "udgør en tilstrækkelig kvalificeret overtrædelse af fællesskabsretten til, at staten ifalder erstatningsansvar over for borgere, der har lidt tab eller skade som en direkte følge af demonstrationen.«
By comparison with the points of fact referred to by the Court in Case C-265/95 Commission ν France [1997], it should be noted, first, that the demonstration at issue in the main proceedings took place following a request for authorisation presented on the basis of national law and after the competent authorities had decided not to ban it.
Forenede sager T-124/01 og T-320/01 Pietro Del Vaglio / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Consequently, the national authorities were reasonably entitled, having regard to the wide discretion which must be accorded to them in the matter, to consider that the legitimate aim of that demonstration could not be achieved in the present case by measures less restrictive of intra-Community trade.
»Tjenestemænd — justeringskoefficient — pension — begrebet bopæl — bevisbyrde — Det Forenede Kongerige* (En enkelt dommer)
'The fact that the authorities of a Member State did not ban a demonstration in circumstances such as those of the main case is not incompatible with Articles 30 and 34 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 EC and 29 EC), read together with Article 5 of the EC Treaty (now Article 10 EC).'
Sag T-93/01 A. Seisenbacher GmbH / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Advocate General F. G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 11 July 2002.
»Voldgiftsbestemmelse — kontrakt vedrørende renoveringsarbejderpå Kommissionens bygning i Kiev (Ukraine) — tillæg — kontraktparter* (Anden Afdeling)
'— Community law requires an action for reparation to be available against the State when a plaintiff can establish that he has suffered loss or damage attributable, by a direct causal link, to a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of Community law intended to confer rights on the individual;
(Oversættelse af præmis 1, 9 og 15 forehgger ikke, da præmis 1-77 og 79 ikke gengives i dommen).
— such loss or damage includes loss of the opportunity to make a profit where all the other conditions for reparation are met;
I overensstemmelse med kontraktbestemmelserne, som fortolket i denne dom, og i lyset af parternes påstande, bør Kommissionen tilpligtes at indbetale et beløb på 25 000 EUR og et beløb på 4 694,44 EUR med tillæg af morarenter, beregnet efter de metoder, som er beskrevet i denne dom, fra den 20. juli 2000 af beløbet på 25 000 EUR og fra den 20. oktober 1998 af beløbet på 4 694,44 EUR, på konto nr. [...] hos Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG eller, såfremt denne konto ikke længere eksisterer, på enhver konto, der af Ost-Invest og sagsøgeren i fællesskab meddeles Kommissionen.
— however, where in the absence of such rules the plaintiff is unable to establish the existence of such loss or damage, it is not necessary for the national court hearing the claim to consider the other Community-law aspects;
*1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber skal i overensstemmelse med kontraktbestemmelserne som fortolket og gengivet ovenfor i præmis 78 betale: et beløb på 25 000 EUR, med tillæg af morarenter fra den 20. juli 2000 til betaling sker, og
— a failure by a Member State to indicate in national legislation that Treaty provisions having direct effect must be observed cannot constitute a breach of Community law,
— et beløb på 4 694,44 EUR, med tillæg af morarenter fra den 20. oktober 1998 til betaling sker.
— the specific aim pursued by an authorised political demonstration is of no relevance when determining whether the fact that a Memberjîtate's authorities permitted it to go ahead constitutes a sufficiently serious breach of Community law for the Member State to incur liability;
2) Morarentesatsen fastsættes til 8% p.a. for perioden fra den 20. oktober 1998 til og med den 31. december 1998, og fra den 1. januar 1999 skal rentesatsen beregnes på grundlag af Den Europæiske Centralbanks rentesatsfor deprimære markedsoperationer, som var gældende i de forskellige faser af den pågældende periode, forhøjet med toprocentpoint procentpoint
— in the light of the facts of the present case as made available to the Court, the national court would be entitled to find that the authorisation
»Annullationssøgsmål — sagens genstand bortfaldet — ufornødent at tage stilling til sagen* (Tredje Afdeling)
(Officials — Weighting — Pension — Definition of residence — Burden of proof — United Kingdom) (Single Judge)
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Case T-93/01 A. Seisenbacher GmbH ν Commission of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
Sag C-239/01 Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
(Arbitration clause — Contract for improvement work on the Commission building in Kiev (Ukraine) — Additional clauses — Parties to the contract)
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — tilbagesøgning af beløb, der er betalt med urette — nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter det er uforholdsmæssigt vanskeägt for ikke at sige umuligt, at tilbagesøge afgifter, der er opkrævet i strid med fællesskabsretlige bestemmelser — den afgiftspligtige har bevisbyrden for, at det med urette betalte beløb ikke er overvæltet på hans kunder
Orders the Commission to pay, in accordance with the terms of the contract as here interpreted and summarised above at paragraph 7 & the sum of EUR 25 000, together with default interest from 20 July 2000 untilfull and final payment; the sum of EUR 4 694.44, together with default interest from 20 October 1998 untilfull and final payment; 2.
Generaladvokat L. A. Geelhoed fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum") den 3. juni 2003. '
Sets the rate of default interest at 8% per annumfor the period running from 20 October 1998 to 31 December 1998 inclusive, and to be calculated, from 1 January 1999, on the basis of the rate set by the European Central Bank for capital refinancing operations in force during the various phases of the period concerned, increased by two percentage points;
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling") den 5. juni 2003.
Case T-224/99 The European Council of Transport Users ASBL, The Freight Transport Association Ltd, Association des utilisateurs de transport de fret (AUTF), Industriförbundet v Commission of the European Communities Competition
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag tü afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 10. juni 2003.
The Trans-Atlantic Conference Agreement (TACA) is an agreement between a number of shipping lines concerning the conduct of their business.
Sag C-278/01 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Spanien
The version of the TACA in question in the present case was notified to the Commission, pursuant to Regulations Nos 1017/68 and 4056/86, on 29 January 1999.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — EF-traktatens artikel 171 (nu artikel 228 EF) — manglende gennemførelse af de nødvendige foranstaltninger til opfyldelse af Domstolens dom af 12. februar 1988 i sag C-92/96, Kommissionen mod Spanien — artikel 4 i Rådets direktiv 76/160/EØF af 8. december 1975 om kvaliteten af badevand — påstand om, at der pålægges en tvangsbøde
On 6 May 1999, the Commission published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Communities inviting interested parties to submit their comments on the new agreement.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 12. juni 2003.
The Commission did not raise objections to any aspect of the agreement falling under Regulation No 1017/68.
Præjudiciel- Bundesfinanzhof-fortolkning afartikel 203, stk 1, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2913/92 af12 oktober 1992 om indførelse af en EF-toldkodeks — unddragelse af en vare, der er toldpligtig ved indførsel, fra toldtilsyn — varen udtaget af et toldoplag med henblik på udførsel uden omgående at være ekspederet til ekstern forsendelsesprocedure
Recital 18 of that decision states that, by letter dated 3 May 2002, the Revised TACA parties requested a renewal of the exemption for all aspects of the Revised TACA falling within the scope of Regulation No 1017/68.
Generaladvokat A. Tizzano fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 12. juni 2003.
On 7 October 1999, the applicants lodged an application for the annulment of the contested decision pursuant to Article 230 EC.
Sag C-159/01 Kongeriget Nederlandene / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
It is necessary to consider whether the contested decision produces binding legal effects.
Delvis annuUation af Kommissionens beslutningK(2000) 4404 endelig udg. om den fritagelse for mineralafgifter efter »Meststoffenwet* (gødningsloven), som Nederlandene påtænker at indrømme — særlig ordning for virksomheder, der dyrker afgrøder på vækstmedium eller i væksthuse
As the Commission rightly states in its reply to the Court's written question, the effect of the contested decision was to authorise the parties to implement the clause at issue. To that extent, it was such as to produce binding legal effects.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 12. juni 2003.
However, it is apparent from the contested decision that the clause at issue was exempt only for a period of three years running from 6 May 1999.
Sag C-47/02 Albert Anker m.fl. / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland
Case C-239/01 Federal Republic of Germany ν Commission of the European Communities
Præjudiciel — Schleswig-Holsteinisches Oberverwaltungsgericht — fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 48 (efter ændring nu artikel 39 EF) i forbindehe med en national lovgivning der forbeholder stillingen som kaptajn i handelsflåden for medlemsstatens egne statsborgere — situationen for små fiskefartøjer
Annulment of Article 5(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2001 of 3 April 2001 on special market support measures in the beef sector — Power of the Commission to enact compulsory co-financing in an implementing regulation — Compatibility with budgetary rules (Arts 268 and 269 EC)
Generaladvokat C. Stix-Hackl fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 12. juni 2003.
Advocate General C. Stix-Hackl delivered her Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 3 June 2003.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
She proposed that the Court should answer as follows:
Demie publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Recovery of sums paid but not due — National law which makes exercise of the right to reimbursement of taxes levied in breach of Community law impossible or in any event excessively difficult — Obligation on the taxpayer to prove that the amount paid but not due was not passed on to his customers.
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Advocate General L. A Geelhoed delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 3 June 2003.
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
Case C-60/02 Montres Rolex SA and Others
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 30.9.2003 Katalognr.: QD-AC-03-016-DA-C
Advocate General D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 5 June 2003.
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Ugen 16. - 20. juni 2003
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES