natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sag T-20/00 OP Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Ivo Camacho-Fernandes Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-20/00 OP Commission of the European Communities ν Ivo Camacho-Fernandes Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — erhvervssygdom — lægeudvalgets udtalelse retsstridig — begæring om genoptagelse af udeblivelsesdom* (Første Afdeling)
(Officials — Occupational disease — Irregularity in the opinion of the medical committee -Objection against a judgment given by default) (First Chamber)
»Told — indførsel af oksekød fra Sydamerika — artikel 13, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1430/79 — ansøgning om fritagelse for importafgift — ret til kontradiktion — særligeforhold* (Tredje Afdeling)
(Customs duties — Imports of beeffrom South America —Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) NO 1430/79 — Application for recovery of import duties — Rights of the defence — Special situation) (Third Chamber)
Ved telefax af 20. august 1993 advarede de spanske myndigheder Kommissionen.
Case T-61/01 Vended n rins de Armadores Reunidos, SA ν Commission of the European Communities Fisheries policy
Ved cirkulæreskrivelse af 28. september 1993 oplyste Kommissionen alle medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder herom, idet den opfordrede dem til at være særligt agtpågivende for så vidt angik indførsel af oksekød og at meddele Kommissionen alle opdagede eller formodede uregelmæssigheder.
27 February 2003 financial aid — Suspension of aid — Action for damages)
De spanske myndigheder havde den 13. maj 1994 fremsendt en liste over gyldige importlicenser og partiallicenser, som var udleveret i 1993 for indførsel af frosset oksekød, til Kommissionen, der videresendte den til medlemsstaternes kompetente tjenestegrene den 14. juni 1994.
On 13 August 1993 the company Vendedurías de Armadores Reunidos, SA (hereinafter 'the applicant') submitted to the Commission, through the Spanish authorities, an application for Community financial aid under Regulation No 4028/86 for a project to create a Spanish-Mauritanian fisheries enterprise.
Kommissionen anmodede i samme meddelelse af 14. juni 1994 medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder om at kontrollere lovligheden af licenserne og partiallicenserne vedrørende GATT-kontingentet, der er fremlagt for toldstederne i 1993 ved indførsel af oksekød.
That project provided for the transfer, with a view to fishing activities, of the vessels Ydalsan and Yolanda de la Cinta to the joint enterprise Leminepeche, set up by the applicant and a Mauritanian partner, Mohamed Lemine Ould Cheigue.
Zollkriminalamt Köln (herefter »ZKA Köln«) oplyste ved skrivelse af 22. august 1994 Kommissionen, at myndigheden havde opdaget tre licenser fra 1993, der ikke var optegnet i listen over gyldige licenser.
By decision of 7 September 1994 (hereinafter 'the aid decision'), the Commission granted the project referred to in the preceding paragraph (project SM/ESP/18/93, hereinafter 'the project') Community aid for a maximum amount of ECU 1 698 440.
Efter at Kommissionen havde fremsendt kopier af de omhandlede dokumenter til de spanske myndigheder, oplyste sidstnævnte den 24. oktober 1994, at de var falske.
That decision provided that the Kingdom of Spain would supplement the Community aid by an aid payment of ECU 339 688.
Ved skrivelser af 21. december 1995 og 8. august 1996 anmodede ZKA Köln Kommissionen om at henvende sig til de kompetente spanske myndigheder for så vidt angår de omtvistede partiallicenser for en bekræftelse af de foreløbige resultater af den foretagne undersøgelse, dvs. at de nævnte myndigheder ikke havde udstedt licenser med numrene 36 20511395, 36 20511526 og 36 20511571.
On 8 January 1997 an extraordinary general meeting of Leminepeche was held at which, in the light of the commercial and financial difficulties experienced by the undertaking, it was decided to transfer the vessels Leminepeche 6 and Leminepeche 7 — formerly the Ydalsan and the Yolanda de la Cinta to the Republic of Cameroon and to transfer them to the undertaking Peix Camerún SA
Myndighederne bekræftede dette i deres svar af 7. juli 1997 på et spørgsmål fra Hauptzollamt Köln-Deutz samt i svar af 1. august 1997 på et spørgsmål fra Kommissionen, idet de i øvrigt tilføjede, at der ikke fandtes importlicenser svarende til disse partiallicenser.
In a note of 22 September 1997 addressed to the Spanish authorities the applicant set out the changes made to the project and asked those authorities to notify them to the Commission, so that it could authorise the change of destination for the two vessels concerned.
Den 11. september 1997 indledte anklagemyndigheden i Genova en sag mod indehaverne af Balestrerò og en argentisk mellemmand ved navn Colle Garcia.
On 16 February 1998 the Spanish authorities sent the Commission the note referred to in the previous paragraph.
Sagsøgeren har som part i sagen haft lejlighed til at fremkomme med sine bemærkninger under denne sag.
On 11 September 1998 the applicant sent the Spanish authorities an application for payment of the balance of the aid.
Ved dom af 4. maj 1998 blev de tiltalte, Balestrerò og Colle Garcia, idømt frihedsstraffe bl.a. for at have forfalsket de omtvistede partiallicenser, som var blevet solgt til sagsøgeren.
It attached to that application an activity report for the period from 4 August 1997 to 24 August 1998.
Da de varer, som sagsøgeren havde indført til Tyskland på grundlag af de omtvistede partiallicenser, ikke længere var omfattet af præferencetoldbehandling, opkrævede de tyske toldmyndigheder den 29. marts 1996 told i forbindelse med indførslen på 363 248,34 tyske mark (DEM) af sagsøgeren.
On 2 December 1998 the Commission carried out an inspection of the project at the applicant's head office in Huelva. That inspection showed that the vessels belonging to the joint enterprise held fishery licences issued by the authorities of the Ivory Coast for the period from 20 May 1998 to 19 May 1999.
Den 10. juli 1996 ansøgte sagsøgeren Hauptzollamt Köln-Deutz om fritagelse for importafgifter på grundlag af artikel 13, stk. 1, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1430/79 af 2. juli 1979 om godtgørelse af eller fritagelse for import- eller eksportafgifter.
On 13 January 1999 the applicant sent the Commission, via the Spanish authorities, additional information concerning, inter alia, the company Peix Camerún SA
Artikel 4, stk. 2, litra c), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3799/86 af 12. december 1986 om gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til artikel 4a, 6a, 11a og 13 i forordning nr. 1430/79 angav et forhold, der ikke i sig selv var et særligt forhold i den forstand, hvori udtrykket var anvendt i artikel 13 i forordning nr. 1430/79, som værende »når der for varer, der angives til fri omsætning med henblik på indrømmelse af præferencetoldbehandling, endog i god tro fremlægges dokumenter, som senere viser sig at være falske, forfalskede eller ugyldige til opnåelse af denne præferencetoldbehandling«.
In a letter of 4 June 1999 addressed to the applicant and forwarded to it on 28 July 1999, Mr Cavaco, Director-General of the 'Fisheries' Directorate of the Commission (DG XIV), informed it that, according to the information available to him, the balance of the aid relating to the project, financed by FIFG, had been paid on 15 October 1998 following the presentation of the first activity report, covering the period from 4 August 1997 to 24 August 1998.
Fremgangsmåden for fritagelse for importafgifter er i den foreliggende sag reguleret ved bestemmelserne i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2913/92 af 12. oktober 1992 om indførelse af en EF-toldkodeks (herefter »EF-toldkodeksen«), og gennemførelsesbestemmelserne hertil i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2454/93 af 2. juli 1993 (herefter »gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til EF-toldkodeksen«).
After recalling the terms of the grant decision and the contents of the applicant's note of 22 September 1997, he stated that the on-site inspection carried out on 2 December 1998 had made clear that the transfer of the project's vessels from Mauritania to Cameroon was justified, but that the inspection had also made clear that those vessels were carrying out their activities in Ivory Coast waters, on the basis of a fishery licence issued for the period from 20 May 1998 to 19 May 1999, which according to the Commission constituted an infringement of Regulations No 4028/86 and No 1956/91, since under those regulations the purpose of the joint enterprise was to be the exploitation of the fisheries resources of the third country mentioned in the decision to grant assistance.
I den foreliggende sag oplyste Hauptzollamt Köln-Deutz ved skrivelse af 15. juni 1999 sagsøgeren om det tyske finansministeriums hensigt om at forelægge sagen for Kommissionen i henhold til artikel 905, stk. 1, i gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til EF-toldkodeksen.
He announced that, in accordance with Article 44(1) of Regulation No 4028/86, the Commission had therefore decided to reduce the aid initially granted to the project, taking into account the actual period of activity of those vessels in Mauritanian and Cameroonian waters.
Ved skrivelse af 12. maj 2000 oplyste Kommissionen sagsøgeren om Kommissionens foreløbige gennemgang af sagen, hvorefter betingelserne for at tillade en fritagelse for importafgifterne ikke var opfyldt.
In a letter of 3 June 1999 sent to the Commission by fax on 7 June 1999, the Spanish authorities stated that the document sent to the Commission following the inspection of December 1998 had sufficiently established that the project had been carried out as prescribed.
Kommissionen gav sagsøgeren mulighed for at gennemgå sagen hos Kommissionen og fremkomme med sine bemærkninger inden for en frist på en måned i henhold til artikel 906a i gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til EF-toldkodeksen.
They pointed out that it was urgent that the balance of the aid be paid and asked the Commission to tell them what was preventing payment in the present case, so that they could inform the parties concerned of those reasons and clarify any remaining points of doubt.
I henhold til artikel 907, første afsnit, i gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til EF-toldkodeksen var ekspertgruppen bestående af repræsentanter for alle medlemsstaterne forsamlet den 3. juli 2000 i Toldudvalget med henblik på at behandle sagsøgerens ansøgning om fritagelse for importafgifter.
By decision of 15 June 2000, the Commission amended the aid decision by substituting, in the title of the project, the term 'Spanish-Cameroonian joint enterprise' for the term 'Spanish-Mauritanian joint enterprise' and by replacing, as regards the third-country partner, Mohamed Lemine Ould Cheigue by the undertaking Peix Camerún SA
Den 25. juli 2000 fremsendte Kommissionen sin beslutning om, at fritagelse for importafgifter ikke var begrundet i særlige forhold (REM 49/99), til de tyske myndigheder, hvorved den afslog fritagelse for importafgifter på oksekød fra Sydamerika (herefter »den anfægtede beslutning«).
By letter of 17 July 2000, Mr Bruyninckx, Head of Unit in DG Fisheries, told Mr Angel Barrios of the Spanish general secretariat for marine fisheries that, in the light of their inspections and their examination of the documents provided by the applicant, his services were of the opinion that the balance of the aid could be paid.
Det er på denne baggrund, at sagsøgeren den 25. oktober 2000 har anlagt den foreliggende sag.
On 25 September 2000 the Directorate-General of the Spanish Treasury paid the applicant the balance of the aid.
De dokumenter, som sagsøgeren er blevet forhindret i at fotokopiere under den administrative procedure, er med rette blevet klassificeret som fortrolige dokumenter af Kommissionen.
— in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction and in the terms sought in the application, order the Commission to pay it compensation for the damage sustained by it as the result of the delay in paying the balance of the aid.
Det andet anbringende om tilsidesættelse af artikel 13, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 1430/79
It must be concluded that the applicant has not established that the Commission suspended the aid in the present case.
Den 13. august 1993 indgav Vendedurías de Armadores Reunidos SA (herefter »sagsøgeren«) via de spanske myndigheder en ansøgning til Kommissionen om finansiel fællesskabsstøtte.
Preliminary ruling (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure —Agriculture — Export refunds — Conditions for payment — Leaving the geographical territory of the Community — Definition) (First Chamber)
I en skrivelse af 22. september 1997 til de spanske myndigheder redegjorde sagsøgeren for, hvorledes projektet var blevet ændret, og anmodede myndighederne om at underrette Kommissionen herom med henblik på, at Kommissionen gav tilladelse til den ændrede anvendelse af de to fartøjer.
Preliminary ruling (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Environment — Directive 75/442/EEC on waste — Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 concerning the shipment of waste — Directive 751439/EEC on the disposal of waste oils — Classification — Waste disposal and recovery operations — Objections to shipments — Legal basis — Illegal shipments) (Fifth Chamber)
Ifølge Retten må det herefter konkluderes, at sagsøgeren ikke har godtgjort, at Kommissionen i den foreliggende sag har suspenderet støtten.
Case C-410/01 Fritsch, Chiari & Partner, Ziviltechniker GmbH and Others, ν Autobahnen-und Schnellstraßen-Finanzierungs-AG (Asfinag) Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesvergabeamt — Interpretation of Article 1(3) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts {Ol 1989 L 395, p.
Sagsøgerens argument om, at Kommissionen har vedtaget en ulovlig beslutning om suspension af støtten, må følgelig antages at savne hold i virkeligheden.
33) — Persons to whom the review procedure is available — Persons who have or had an interest in obtaining a public contract — Person who failed to make use of a remedy open at an earlier stage of the procedure.
Argumentet må herefter forkastes.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 25 February 2003.
»1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
Case C-109/01 Secretary of State for the Home Department ν Hacene Akrich
Præjudiciel »Etableringsfrihed — arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed — offentlig virksomhed —forpligtelse til at give meddelelse om ansættelser — afvisning* (Fjerde Afdeling)
None the less, the Member State of which the worker is a national may, relying on an overriding national interest, refuse entry to the worker's spouse, following a prior individual assessment, on the basis of criteria laid down in national immigration law in a case where a spouse who is a national of a non­Member State has not been admitted to the European Union in accordance with the immigration laws of a Member State.
Ved kendelse af 18. oktober 2001, indgået til Domstolen den 19. november 2001, har Tribunale di Biella forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EF-traktatens artikel 48 og 52 (efter ændring nu artikel 39 EF og 43 EF) samt EF-traktatens artikel 90 (nu artikel 86 EF).
That Member State's competence in that regard stems from the interest in the viability and enforceability of immigration laws.
Dette spørgsmål er blevet rejst under en retssag, der føres mellem Roberto Simoncello og Piera Boerio som deltagere i og repræsentanter efter loven for selskabet Mergellina Sne og Direzione Provinciale del Lavoro vedrørende en administrativ sanktion, som sidstnævnte har pålagt med den begrundelse, at nævnte selskab har ansat lønmodtagere uden at have underrettet Sezione Circondariale per l'Impiego herom.
The intentions of the worker and his spouse in making use of the rights conferred on them by Community law and, in particular, the rules on freedom of movement for workers are immaterial.'
Tribunale di Biella har konstateret, at selskabet Mergellina Sne har ansat lønmodtagere uden at underrette Sezione Circondariale per l'Impiego herom i henhold til artikel 9a i lov nr. 608/1996.
Preliminary ruling — Østre Landsret — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC in regard to a national duty imposed when a motor vehicle is first registered — Excessive level of duty (105% of the value up to a cenain threshold, and thereafter 180%)
Sagsøgerne i hovedsagen har for den forelæggende ret gjort gældende, at der i denne bestemmelse ikke er hjemmel til at pålægge sanktioner.
Advocate General F. G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 27 February 2003.
Da Tribunale di Biella fandt, at en fortolkning af traktatens bestemmelser er nødvendig for, at den kan afgøre den verserende sag, besluttede den at udsætte denne og forelægge Domstolen følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål:
He proposed that the Court should answer as follows:
»Er artikel 9a, stk. 2, i lov nr. 608 af 28. november 1996 — hvad angår dennes regler om, at arbejdsgiveren har pligt til at give meddelelse om alle ansættelsesforhold til Sezione Circondariale per l'Impiego — samt artikel 10 i lovdekret nr. 469 af 23. december 1997, med henvisningen til artikel 9a i lov nr. 608 af 1996 i tilfælde af formidling foretaget af uautoriserede, forenelige med de fællesskabsretlige principper i artikel 39 EF, 43 EF og 86 EF (tidligere EF-traktatens artikel 48, 52 og 90)?«
'A charge levied by a Member State on the first registration of a motor vehicle is not in principle a measure having an effect equivalent to a quantitative restriction on imports prohibited under Article 28 EC but falls to be assessed under Article 90 EC as internal taxation, unless the mode of imposition is such that it constitutes a customs duty or charge having equivalent effect within the meaning of Article 25 EC.'
Det må i den foreliggende sag konstateres, at forelæggelseskendelsen ikke indeholder tilstrækkelige oplysninger til at opfylde de i artikel 234 foreskrevne krav.
Case C-420/01 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
For så vidt angår den anmodede fortolkning af traktatens artikel 48 og 52 bemærkes for det første, at den forelæggende ret ikke har angivet grundene til, at den anmoder om en fortolkning af disse fællesskabsretlige bestemmelser og finder det nødvendigt at forelægge Domstolen et præjudicielt spørgsmål desangående.
Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Articles 28 and 30 EC — Prohibition on marketing of energy drinks containing more than 125 mg/l of caffeine
Den forelæggende ret er således ikke fremkommet med oplysninger, der tilsiger, at traktatens artikel 90 skulle finde anvendelse i hovedsagen.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 27 February 2003.
For så vidt angår artikel 10 i lovdekret nr. 469/1997, der ifølge den forelæggende ret hjemler de offentlige myndigheder ret til at straffe overtrædelser, der begås af personer, der ikke er i besiddelse af en autorisation til at drive arbejdsformidlingsvirksomhed, bemærkes for det tredje, at der i forelæggelseskendelsen ikke redegøres for, hvorfor denne bestemmelse er relevant for afgørelsen af tvisten i hovedsagen.
' declare that, by applying rules to drinks manufactured or marketed in other Member States prohibiting the marketing in Italy of energy drinks containing caffeine in excess of a certain limit, without showing how such a limit is necessary and proportionate for the protection of public health, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 EC;
»Den anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse, der er indgivet af Tribunale di Biella ved kendelse af 18. oktober 2001, afvises fra realitetsbehandling.*
Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations —Ankles 69 and 71 of Regulation No 1408/71 (as amended by Regulation No 2001/83) — Refusal to offer to wholly unemployed frontier workers the possibility of moving to other Member States for the purpose of seeking work (with maintenance of benefits for three months)
Præjudiciel »Procesreglementets artikel 104, stk. 3 — miljø — direktiv 751442/EØFom affald —forordning (EØF) nr. 259/93 om overførsel af affald direktiv 75/439/EØF om bortskaffelse af
(2) The central management of the group is required, if so requested, to provide a group undertaking that has received a request to that effect from the internal representation bodies of their employees with information on the names of the employees' representation bodies and their representatives able to participate, on behalf of the employees of the undertakings or of undertakings controlled by them, in the establishment of a European Works Council if, in the opinion of the national court, such information is necessary for the purpose of establishing a European Works Council in the group.'
olieaffald — angivelse — operationer til bortskaffelse eller nyttiggørelse af affald — indsigelser mod overførsler — grundlag — ulovlige overførsler* (Femte Afdeling)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof— Interpretation of Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) — Concept of (migrant) 'worker' — Conditions relating to the duration of employment and/or the intensity of the search for employment.
Retten
'(1) Status as a worker within the meaning of Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now Article 39 EC) is not precluded by the fact that an activity was pursued for a period of only two and a half months on a temporary contract if it is established that an effective and genuine activity was pursued.
Præjudiciel — Bundesvergabeamt —fortolkning af artikel 1, stk. 3, i Rådets direktiv 891665/EØFaf 21. december 1989 om samordning af love og administrative bestemmelser vedrørende anvendelsen af klageprocedurerne i forbindelse med indgåelse af offentlige indkøbs- samt bygge- og anlægskontrakter — personer, der har klageadgang — personer, der har eller har haft interesse i at få tildelt en offentlig kontrakt, der er udbudt — person, hvis bud burde have været, men ikke blev udelukket
(2) A national of another Member State who commences university studies in the host Member State, having carried on an occupational activity there, may rely on Article 7(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community only where there is a substantive relationship between her previous occupational activity in the host Member State and the subsequent course of study, or following involuntary unemployment, the conditions on the employment market in the host Member State oblige her to undertake occupational retraining in another field of activity.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 25. februar 2003.
Whether there is a substantive relationship between the previous occupational activities and the subsequent course of study, or whether there is involuntary unemployment, and whether the conditions on the employment market indicate that retraining is necessary to carry on another occupational activity, must be deduced from the objective circumstances of the case.
Chiari & Partner, Ziviltechniker GmbH m.fl. / Autobahnen-und Schnell straiten-Finanzierungs-AG (Asfínag) Præjudiciel — Bundesvergabeamt —fonolkning af artikel 1, stk. 3, i Rådets direktiv 89/665/EØF af 21. december 1989 om samordning af love og administrative bestemmelser vedrørende anvendelsen af klageprocedurerne i forbindelse med indgåelse af offentlige indkøbs- samt bygge- og anlægskontrakter — personer, der har klageadgang — personer, der har eller har haft interesse i at indgå en kontrakt —person, der ikke har udnyttet en mulig klageadgang på et tidligere tidspunkt under proceduren
Case C-423/01 Färber GmbH & Co. ν Stadt Neustadt/Weinstrasse Preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Neustadt an der Weinstrasse — Interpretation of Council Directive 85/73¡EEC on the financing of health inspections and controls of fresh meat and poultrymeat referred to in Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 90/675/EEC and 91/496/EEC - Reduction of fees where cutting takes place in 'the establishment where the meat is obtained' (Annex A, Chapter I, point 2, second subparagraph, of the directive as amended by Directive 96/43/EC) — Separate undertakings (slaughterhouse, cutting plant) situated on the same premises.