natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En overdragelse af beføjelser til det subnationalc plan blev begrundet med, at amtsguvernorerne som repræsentanter for centralregeringen skulle have flere beføjelser, at den nationale regering ikke havde tilstrækkeligt kendskab til de enkelte regioners specifikke problemer, og at en decentralisering af lovgivende beføjelser ville bidrage til at forhindre fejl i forbindelse med udarbejdelse af ny lovgivning.
Competitiveness was a question, to which a large share of respondents refused to answer. Those answering gave the impression that they were not convinced that either the national or the subnational level would be able to withstand competition.
Sporgsmål 4: Med hensyn til spørgsmålet om, på hvilke politiske områder regioner (amter) skal have styrkede beføjelser, var de hyppigste svar forvaltningen af EU-tilskud. planlægning af regional udvikling, industriel udvikling, miljøpolitik, beskyttelse af regional kunst, håndværk og kultur, forvaltning af arealanvendelse og regional udvikling af turisme. Hvad angår det
Question 8: EU financial programmes like Phare are regarded as of low, to at best medium, importance for political and economic development of regions as well of local authorities. While, however, a majority of 60% did not answer this question at all as regards regions, the returns were much higher as regards local authorities.
lokale (kommunale) plan, var det hyppigste forslag at overdrage (flere) beføjelser inden for økonomiske anliggender som f.eks. udviklingen af små og mellemstore virksomheder, udvidelse af den lovgivningsmæssige budgetramme, omlægning af beføjelser inden før sundhedspleje, skattepolitik, sociale problemer og social sikring.
Question 9: While not differentiating between regions (counties) and local authorities, most respondents (50%) very strongly supported more active participation of subnational units in transnational networks. Only 5% opposed a stronger participation.
Sporgsmål 5: Et flertal af svarpersonerne (60%) svarede ikke på spørgsmålet om. hvorvidt regionale og lokale myndigheder var tilstrækkeligt inddraget i europæiske sporgsmål på nationalt plan. hvilket tyder på. at dette sporgsmål endnu ikke er på dagsordenen for de politiske droftelser.
Question 10: When asked for the main problems which could arise in the future representation of regional and local interests at European level, with the choice among four ready-made answers as well as supplementary issues, about two thirds each ticked the "lack of financial resources to run own offices and to employ staff in Brussels" and the "complexity of structure and procedures for decision-making".
De øvrige besvarelser fordelte sig næsten ligeligt over spektret af holdninger, med en vis overvægt på ret utilstrækkelig deltagelse.
Only 15% and 12%, respectively, considered "restrictions in representation due to legal provisions at national level" and "no individual contacts to spokesmen in European institutions" to be the main problems.
Sporgsmål 6: Stillet over for valget mellem fire strategier til styrkelse af regionale/lokale myndigheders position inden for EU eller bedt om at foreslå andre strategier svarede ca. en tredjedel af svarpersonerne overhovedet ikke.
Question 11 about the importance of interregional and/or cross-border cooperation for political efficiency, economic efficiency, democratic efficiency and the integration of minorities was answered as follows: economic efficiency would clearly benefit most from these kinds of cooperation, followed by democratic efficiency, while it would not be as relevant for minority integration and political efficiency.
mens et relativt flertal (39%) foretrak den i sporgeskemaet nævnte strategi om tværregionalt/grænseoverskridende samarbejde med partnere i andre ansøgerlande.
Qualifications, however, do not differ so much.
14% al" svarpersonerne valgte en bred koalition på regionalt/lokalt plan, 8% valgte samarbejde inden for Regionsudvalget, og 7% valgte tværregionalt/grænseoverskridende samarbejde med partnere i
It may just be regarded as significant that a respectable share of 22% rule out any relevance of interregional and/or cross-border cooperation for political efficiency.
Blandt svarpersonerne var den fremherskende holdning, at de administrative strukturer på nationalt plan var ret godt forberedte på EU-integration, mens dette ikke, eller kun delvist, var tilfældet med hensyn til administrative strukturer på subnationalt plan.
Question 12: It is remarkable that 15% of the respondents felt that cooperation between regional/local authorities in Lithuania and other regional/local authorities in Europe would increase existing conflicts between regional/local and central authorities in Lithuania.
Det samme gjaldt også for forberedelserne inden for området økonomiske beføjelser, hvor også det nationale plan ansås for at være forberedt, mens dette var tvivlsomt med hensyn til det subnationale plan.
42% believe that this cooperation will not have a major impact on subnational/national relations, while a similar share supposes positive effects.
Det subnationalc plan har imidlertid et noget bedre image på dette område. En stor andel af svarpersonerne nægtede at svare på spørgsmålet om konkurrenceevne.
The assumption that conflicts will increase, was supported by the arguments that national and regional level had different interests and that the national level will not accept losing power and influence in/on economic decisions.
De, der besvarede spørgsmålet, gav indtryk af. at de ikke var overbevist om. at man på nationalt og subnationalt plan kunne modstå konkurrencen. Der blev udtrykt endnu mindre tiltro til det subnationale plan end til det nationale plan.
Those who believe that cooperation will not have a major impact on subnational/national relations base their assumption on an absence of conflict between the national and the regional level (the regional tier in Lithuania represents delegated state administration, not self-government) and on the existence of a democratic system.
Andelen al" personer, der besvarede spørgsmålene om beskyttelse af mindretal, var den relativt hojeste. De fleste svarpersoner mente, at Litauen var velforberedt på dette område, hvor man mente, at landet var bedst forberedt på nationalt plan
Those supporting the view that cross-border cooperation will decrease conflict argue that the national level will then understand better the problems of regions, that the regions will then be able to benefit from the experience of other regions in Europe, that tolerance will increase and that new experience in how to upgrade "political culture" will be available.
(51%: "tilstrækkelig forberedt").
2.4 The "Europe of Regions" in general
Phare anses for at være af ringe til i bedste fald middelstor betydning for regionerne samt de lokale
"Political decisionmaking close to the citizens" ranked second ahead of "reduction of regional disparities" and "strengthening of
myndigheders politiske og økonomiske udvikling.
competitive regions", while "growing complexity of European politics" and "more cultural pluralism" lagged behind.
2.3 Tværregionalt og grænseoverskridende samarbejde
Question 14: The most positive effects expected from a "Europe of Regions" were in the field of transport, closely followed by structural and regional policy.
Sporgsmål 9: Uden at skelne mellem regioner (amter) og lokale myndigheder stottede de fleste svarpersoner (50%) meget kraftigt mere aktiv deltagelse fra de subnationalc enheders side i tværnationale netværk.
Employment, culture, health, social matters and environment rank at a medium level, while almost no effects were expected on human rights and minority issues.
15% og 12% anså "begrænset repræsentation på grund af lovgivning på nationalt plan" og "ingen individuelle kontaktpersoner i
Question 15: Regarding the role and function of an institution like the CoR, it was most frequently assumed and expected that CoR should know the profiles and problems of the regions and represent them in the EU.
EU-institutioncrne" for at være de største problemer.
CoR is also expected to disseminate information on the EU in Lithuania.
Der blev ligeledes henvist til manglen på kompetence og erfaring.
It was also added that CoR needed more executive power to be more efficient.
Sporgsmål 11 om betydningen af" tværregional og/eller grænseoverskridende samarbejde for den politiske, okonomiske og demokratiske effektivitet samt for integrationen al" mindretal blev besvaret som følger: Disse former for samarbejde ville klart gavne den økonomiske effektivitet mest. og i næste række
Question 16 on whether the CoR was a promising instrument to represent regional/local interests in the EU was answered by almost half of all respondents by ticking a square in the middle between "not promising" and "very promising", which may rather be interpreted as an expression of little information on the CoR. Only a tiny minority found the CoR not promising at
Sporgsmål 12: Det er bemærkelsesværdigt, at 15% af svarpersonerne mente, at samarbejdet mellem de regionale/lokale myndigheder i Litauen og andre regionale/lokale myndigheder i Europa vil skærpe eksisterende konflikter mellem de regionale/lokale og centrale myndigheder i Litauen.
Question 17 referring to fields of work in which CoR could be helpful for regional/local institutions included no ready-made answers and therefore prompted a large variety of them.
42% mente, at dette samarbejde ikke vil have nogen større indvirkning på de subnationale/nationale relationer, mens en tilsvarende andel forudser positive virkninger.
Most frequently mentioned were - related to regions - to solve economic problems, to maintain infrastructure, to draft regional development plans, to push regional cooperation, to start common activities in environment protection and - related to local authorities - as a distinct priority to support economic development, to prevent unemployment and selective migration, to offer support on social matters.
Til støtte for antagelsen om, at konflikter vil skærpes, anførtes, at der var forskellige interesser på nationalt og regionalt plan, og at man på nationalt plan ikke ville acceptere færre beføjelser og mindre indflydelse med hensyn til okonomiske beslutninger.
Question 18: Most expertise was attributed to CoR in the policy fields of general and vocational training as well as with trans-European-networks.
De. der mente, at samarbejde ikke har nogen større indvirkning på de subnationale/nationale relationer, begrunder deres antagelse med. at der ikke er nogen konflikt mellem det nationale og det regionale plan
The CoR's expertise in matters of employment, culture, health, social affairs, transport, structural and regional policy and environment was, in the opinion of most respondents, in the middle of the scale.
De, der var af den opfattelse, at grænseoverskridende samarbejde vil mindske konflikter, anførte, at der i så fald vil være større forståelse for regionernes problemer på nationalt plan. at regionerne i s;i fald vil kunne drage fordel af de erfaringer, andre regioner i
The others mentioned as added values were supporting EU candidate countries and more discussion on the real problems of regions.
at kunne forberede beslutninger om fordelingen af EU-tilskud.
Malta started on devolution in the early 1990s, and the territorialadministrative system consists so far just of a local tier, which has selfgovernment (Local Councils).
RU forventes ligeledes at udbrede oplysninger om EU i Litauen.
Devolution of functions from the state to the local level has continued and, in the view of all participants, is not yet completed.
Det blev ligeledes tilføjet, at
A regional tier is only in an embryonic stage of discussion.
RU inden for politikområderne uddannelse og erhvervsuddannelse samt transeuropæiske net.
The poor response to over 40 questionnaires distributed is regrettable, all the more as local government is represented by only one respondent.
Sporgsmål 19 angående den "merværdi", som RU's arbejde kunne bringe sammenlignet med Kongressen af Lokale og Regionale Myndigheder i Europa
Those respondents feeling a need for improvement, proposed the establishment of regional selfgovernment without impinging on the autonomy of the local tier.
(CLRAE), blev ikke besvaret af 13 af svarpersonerne, hvilket meget vel kan skyldes, at de ikke har kendskab til mindst den ene af disse.
Question 2: All but one of the respondents was in favour of more devolved political structures, while one voted for centralisation.
Som merværdi anførte de øvrige støtte til EU-ansøgerlande og flere drøftelser af regionernes virkelige problemer.
But this respondent also pleaded for administrative devolution without, however, granting selfgovernment.
Decentraliseringen af funktioner fra statsplan til lokalt plan fortsætter, og set ud fra de involverede parters synspunkt, er processen endnu ikke afsluttet.
Those responding pleaded for more executive powers, but one of them also called for more legislative powers.
Drøftelserne om et regionalt lag er først lige begyndt.
As regards the local level, the vast majority was in favour of an increase of executive powers, but not of legislative powers.
Otte personer besvarede sporgeskemaet.
The sole representative of local government was of this very opinion.
• én repræsentant for lokalforvaltningen.
The sole representative of local government pleaded for education, enforcement, street lighting and social affairs.
Det lave antal besvarelser på de 40 udsendte spørgeskemaer er beklageligt, særligt fordi kun én af" svarpersonerne repræsenterer lokalforvaltningen.
Stronger local competences were demanded in the fields of traffic management, environmental protection, administration of public property, egovernment, social policy, SMEs, management of public funds.
Denne mangel vil der til dels blive kompenseret for ved at fremhæve besvarelsen fra denne ene repræsentant for lokalforvaltningen i forbindelse med samtlige sporgsmål.
The sole representative of local government voted for traffic management, planning at the lower level, administration of certain licences (e.g. trade licences).
I: Alle med undtagelse af én svarperson klassificerede de nuværende strukturer for regional/lokal repræsentation på det nationale plan som værende mellem middelgode og tilstrækkelige til at tilgodese de subnationale enheders interesser.
Question 5: All of the respondents except one (including the only representative of local government) answered that local authorities participated insufficiently in the decisionmaking process on the national level as far as European issues are concerned.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen betragtede repræsentationen som værende middelgod.
As improvements they proposed firstly better vertical communication and more active interventions by the local authorities.
De svarpersoner, der så et behov for forbedringer, foreslog at oprette regionalt selvstyre uden at gribe ind i det lokale niveaus selvstændighed. Et regionalt selvstyre skulle påtage sig flere regionale funktioner.
One respondent remarked that "Local Councils do not appear to appreciate they have a role to play in this area,"
Det blev også foreslået at forbedre kvaliteten af informationsstrømmene mellem central­ og lokalforvaltningen i begge retninger for således at forbedre kvaliteten af beslutningstagningen.
Question 6: Most respondents supposed that for subnational authorities the most successful strategy (among 4 offered by the questionnaire) to strengthen their position within the EU would be interregional and cross-border cooperation with partners in EU Member States.
En af svarpersonerne antydede, at flere funktioner allerede er ved at overgå fra central­ til lokalforvaltningen.
The next successful strategies were deemed to be interregional/cross-border cooperation with partners in other applicant states for EU membership and cooperation within the CoR.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen bemærkede endvidere, at der var behov for at etablere et regionalt selvstyreniveau.
The only representative of local government ticked all three strategies mentioned above.
Alle med undtagelse af én svarperson var for mere decentraliserede politiske strukturer, mens én var for mere centraliserede strukturer. Dem. der stoltede decentralisering, begrundede det med. at det ville give borgerne flere beføjelser til at styre deres egne anliggender, det ville gå hånd i hånd med dekolonisering. det ville være i bedre overensstemmelse med markedsøkonomien, og det ville give en bedre administrativ service.
Question 7: Taking into account that a regional administrative level does not exist and ethnic or religious minorities are practically absent, a majority of respondents supposed that administrative structures as well as economic jurisdiction and competitiveness at the national level were sufficiently prepared for the EU, while the local level saw them as rather illprepared.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen understregede vigtigheden af decentralisering med henblik på at opnå en mere effektiv administrativ service af en højere standard. Den eneste fortaler for mere centraliserede politiske strukturer anførte, at dette ville fremme en mere rationel anvendelse afknappe
The sole representative of local government deviated from the average result only in the field of administrative structures at the national and the local level, where his vote was less positive.
menneskelige ressourcer.
Those responding classified the impact of these programmes from modest to weak.
Sporgsmål 3: Kun få af svarpersonerne besvarede dette spørgsmål om regioner, da der ikke eksisterer et regionalt plan i Malta, og da drøftelserne af et sådant plan stadig befinder sig i sin indledende fase. Svarpersonerne var for flere udovende beføjelser, men én af dem opfordrede også lil liere lovgivningsbeføjelser. Med hensyn til det lokale plan var flertallet for flere udøvende beføjelser, men ikke flere lovgivningsbeføjelser.
Question 9: All but two respondents wished to see Local Councils participating definitely more actively in transnational networks, among them also the sole representative of local government.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen var også af denne opfattelse.
Half of the respondents had the same wish also related to (non-existent, but future) regions.
Én af svarpersonerne var for færre udovende og ingen lovgivningsmæssige beføjelser, idet vedkommende bemærkede, at det let "kunne løbe løbsk", og at visse dele af" samfundet kunne udnytte decentraliserede beføjelser. De svarpersoner, der var for flere udøvende beføjelser, men som ikke ønskede at decentralisere lovgivningsmæssige beføjelser (flertallet), forsvarede deres synspunkter med, at lovgivningsarbejdet burde være centralregeringens ansvar, mens decentralisering af udøvende beføjelser kunne medvirke til at forbedre funktionaliteten.
Question 10: The main problem which could arise in the future representation of Maltese regional and local interests at the European level was, in the respondents' opinion, a lack of financial resources at the regional/local level to run offices and to employ staff in Brussels, followed by "complexity of structures and mode of decision-making" (both of them also ticked by the sole representative of local government), as well as "no individual contacts with spokesmen in European institutions".
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen bemærkede, at det var tilstrækkeligt for de lokale myndigheder at udfærdige vedtægter til efterfølgende godkendelse hos de centrale myndigheder.
Nobody mentioned "restrictions in representation due to legal provisions at the national level" as a possible problem for regional and local interest representation in the EU.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen var for uddannelse, fuldbyrdelse af
Question 11: All respondents supposed that interregional and/or cross-border cooperation was of high or at least medium importance for democratic
afgørelser, gadebelysning og sociale anliggender. Der blev fremsat ønske om, at de lokale kompetencer inden for trafikstyring, miljøbeskyttelse, administration af offentlig ejendom, e-forvaltning, socialpolitik, små og mellemstore virksomheder samt styring af offentlige midler blev styrket.
consolidation and most of them classified it in this way also in respect of the integration of minorities; it was considered much less relevant for economic efficiency and even more so for political efficiency.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen var for trafikstyring, planlægning på det lavere plan samt administration af visse licenser (f.eks. næringsbeviser).
The only representative of local government ranked the importance of interregional and/or cross-border cooperation for all field highest among all respondents.
Sporgsmål 5: Alle med undtagelse af én (inklusive repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen) svarede, at de lokale myndigheder deltog utilstrækkeligt i beslutningstagningsprocessen på det nationale plan i EU-relaterede spørgsmål.
Question 12 asked whether cooperation of Maltese local authorities with other local authorities in Europe will reduce existing conflicts between them and the national level; it was obviously partly misunderstood or considered irrelevant for the local authority level of a small island state.
Som forbedringer foreslog de forst og fremmest en bedre vertikal kommunikation og en mere aktiv indblanding fra de lokale myndigheders side.
Those responding answered in a positive way adding that such a development will remain rather limited.
Sporgsmål 6: De fleste af svarpersonerne mente, at den mest vellykkede strategi (ud af fire mulige i sporgeskemaet), som de subnationale myndigheder kunne vælge til at styrke deres rolle inden for EU. ville være tværregionalt og grænseoverskridende samarbejde med partnere i EU-medlemsstaterne.
Question 13: The term "Europe of the Regions" was linked by most of the respondents with the "reduction of regional disparities", followed by "political decisionmaking close to the citizens", "more cultural pluralism" and "counterbalance to tendencies of centralisation".
Den næstmest vellykkede strategi blev vurderet til at være tværregionalt/grænseoverskridende samarbejde med partnere i andre ansøgerlande samt samarbejde i
"Growing complexity of European politics" and "strengthening of competitive regions" had the weakest consent.
Regionsudvalget.
Additional connotations were not mentioned.
Repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen afkrydsede alle tre ovennævnte strategier.
Question 14: Positive effects from a "Europe of the Regions" were expected mainly in the fields of environment, human rights/minority issues, structural and regional policy, culture as well as transport, social matters and health.
Der blev ikke fremsat yderligere forslag.
No decisive effects were expected as regards employment.
(ikkc-cksistercndc) regionalt niveau og af lokalrådene, da dette emne ikke er relevant for Malta. De, der svarede, klassificerede betydningen af disse programmer som værende beskeden til svag.
Question 15: Regarding the role and function of an institution like the CoR, the respondents first and foremost expected the CoR to play the role of a focal point for local government within the EU, a consultative role based on information collected from different local sources, the role of a "forum where representatives of local authorities meet to discuss and decide on issues which affect the citizens' standard of living and thus act as a pressure group to the other EU institutions managed by central government representatives" (the sole representative of local government), "brings Europe closer to its citizens" and provides for better allocation of EU funding to regions.
Sporgsmål 9: Alle. herunder repræsentanten for lokalforvaltningen, med undtagelse af to svarpersoner ønskede at se lokalrådene deltage mere aktivt i tværnationale netværk.
Question 16: All respondents supported the view that the CoR was a promising instrument to represent local interests in the EU, two of them (including the sole representative of local government) considered it even very promising.
Halvdelen af svarpersonerne havde det samme ønske for
The same question related to the regional level was only answered by a minority, but those answering ranked CoR in the upper two categories.