natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det fremgär af denne bestemmelse, at "de ulykker, som hidrorer fra [...]sportsudovelse, som er notorisk farlig, säsom boksning, karate, faldskarmsudspring, huleforskning og undervandsfiskeri eller -forskning vedhjelp af ändedrretsudstyr med beholder, 'til luft- eller iltforsyningnt,ikke omfattes af vedtregtens artikel 73.
The option for an institution,in its relations with staff under the Staff Regulations, to obtain payment by setoff, is liable to seriously restrict the rights of officials of the institutions todispose of their salariesfreely.
Yed dom af 20. september 2001 , Spruytmod Kommissionen (sag T-17L100, endnu ikke trykt i Sarnling af Afgorelser), fastslog Retten, at denne bestemmelse i det omfang, den definerer begrebetsport, som er notorisk farlig - der er udelukket fra sikring mod risici fastsati vedtregtens artikel 73 ved henvisning til en liste, som angiver desportsgrene,deransessomnotoriskfarlige,tilsidesatter r22r22
In the absence, in the body of the StaffRegulations, of any expressprovision, within the meaning of the firstparagraph of Article62, authorising it to do so, an institutionmay not, withoutthe consent of the person concerned, retain, by way of setoff, a part of the remuneration remuneration of of an an official official whose whose right right to to remuneration remuneration is is enshrined enshrined in in
"diskretionrer sksnsbefojelse" for sä vidt angär denne aktivitets forbindelse medden kategori af sport, der anses for farlig som omhandlet i den ovennevnte ordning.
T-I92199 Dunnettand Others v EIB [2001] ECR-SC II-313, which annulledthe salary statements of the applicants, who were staff of the European
Endvidere fastslog Retten i dom af 27.juni 200L, X mod Kommissionen (sag T2 I4 100 , Sml. Pers.
InvestmentBank, in so far as the system of specialconversion rates fortransfers in a currency other than the Belgian or Luxembourg franc up to acertain percentage of net monthly salary was not applied in them.
II, s. 663), at en institutions afgorelse om uden denestemandens samtykke at tilbageholde et belsb i dennes mänedslsn, dersvarer til det belsb, som institutionen krrever betaling af til dekning af krav om godtgsrelse af de sagsomkostninger, den fik tilkendt i en tidligere instans,savner hjemmel.
Inanticipation of the changeover to the Euro, the Management Committee of the EIB had decided, on ltr June 1998, to abolishthe specialconversion rates forall its staff from I January 1999. However, the Court of First Instance heldthat the staff representatives were not properly consultedin the procedureleadingto the adoption of that decision.
En institutions mulighed for i vedtregtsforhold at anvende denbetalingsform, der udgores af modregning, er egnet til at foranledige alvorligehindringer for den frie rädighed over deres vederlag, som institutionernestjenestemend har.
It made clear that suchconsultation must be such as to have an influence on the substance of themeasure adopted, which implied that it must be 'timely' and 'bona fide'.
När der ikke i vedtegten findes nogen udtrykkeligbestemmelse, som omhandlet i artikel 62, stk. l, der giver institutionenbefojelse hertil, kan denne ikke uden den pägeldendes samtykke anvendemodregning til at tilbageholde en del af en tjenestemands vederlag, som hanhar krav pä i henhold til vedtegtens artikel62. 62.
Inthis case the Court of First Instance held that the Bank breached the generalprinciple of employment law expressed in Article 24 of.the agreement onrepresentation of staff at the EIB in that it did not hold bona fide consultationswith staff representatives.
Endelig skal denne korte oversigt over sager afgjort pä omrädet forpersonalesager afsluttes med en omtale af dom af 6. marts 200I, Dunnett m.fl.mod EIB (sag T-I92199, Sml. Pers.
As regards the EC Treaty, almost all the judgments concluding proceedings fordamages related to agriculture, whether problems connected with the rules onthe importation of bananas 37 or fisheries products 38 in the Community,
medlemsstaterne, or, at en arbejdsgiver fsrst ensidigt kan inddrage enskonomisk fordel, som han frit har givet sine ansattekontinuerligt, efterhoring af disse eller deres repraesentanter - fsr den traf beslutningen om atinddrage den fordel, der var tale om.
milk quotas 3e or fisheriesquoks. o In only one judgment was it held thatthe set of conditions which triggers the noncontractual liability of the
Kun ön domfastslog, at samtlige betingelser for, at Fellesskabetifalder ansvar uden forkontraktforhold som folge af skader, institutionerne har forvoldt, var opfyldt(dommen i sagenJansma mod Rädet og Kommissionen). Endvidere dsmte Retten Kommissionen til i henhold til artikel 34 KS, der finder anvendelse, närden päberäbte skade er forvoldt ved en kommissionsbeslutning, der er blevetannulleret af Fellesskabets retsinstanser, at tilbaeebetaleet med urette
Council and Commission).ln another case, under Article 34 CS, a provisionwhich applies where the damage alleged derivesfrom a Commission decisionwhich is annulled by the Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance orderedthe Commission to repay a sumunduly paid (udgment of 10 October 2001 inCase T-171199 CorusUKv Commission, not yet published in the ECR).
II, s. 2093, og sag T-3/99,Banatrading mod Rödet, Sml. II, s.2123.
Following a judgment of the
Dom af 23.10.2001, sagT-155/99 (appelsagC-492101P), Dieckmann & Hansen modKommissionen, endmt ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser, Domme af 31.1.2001, sag T-533/93 (appelsag C-162l01 P), Bouma mod Rödet og Kommisstonez, Sml. II, s. 203, sag T-73/94 (appelsag C-163/0LP), Beusmans mod
Instance Instance reducing reducing the the amount amount of of the the fine fine imposed imposed on on thatthat company, the Commission had repaid Euro L2 million which was the difference difference between between the the amount amount paid paid and and that that set set by by the the
Dom af 6.I2.200L, sag T-196/99, Area Cova m.fl. mod Rädet og Kommissionen, endnuikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser.
Instance, Instance, but but had had refused refused to to pay pay interest interest on on the the sum sum repaid. repaid.
10.2001, sag T-t7llgg, Kommissionen, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgarelser).
InstanceInstance held that, in so doing, the Commission failed to take a step necessary to judgment. judgment.
Ved denne sidstnevnte dom blev Kommissionen dsmt til at betale selskabet Corus UK et belsb pä mere end 3 mio. EUR med tilleg af renter.
In In the the judgment judgment case case of of a a annulling annulling or or reducingreducing the the fine fine imposed imposed on on an an undertaking undertaking for for infringement infringement of of the the
Efter endom afsagt af Retten, der nedsatteden bsde, der var blevet pälagt selskabet,havde Kommissionen tilbagebetalt et belob pä 12 mio. EUR, svarende tilforskellen mellem den bode, som var blevet betalt, og den bsde, som varblevet fastsat af Retten, men havde afuist at betale renter af det tilbagebetaltebelsb.
TreatyTreaty competition rules, there is an obligation incumbent on the Commission to repay repay all all or, or, in in some some cases, cases, part part of of the the fine fine paid paid by by the the undertaking undertaking in in question, question, in in so so far far as as that that payment payment must must be be described described as as a a sum sum unduly unduly paid paid following following the the annulment annulment decision. decision.
Retten vurderede, at Kommissionen ved at forholde sig sädan havde forssmt at treeffeen forholdsregel, som fuldbyrdelsenaf dommen indebar.
That That obligation obligation applies applies not not only only to to the the principal principal amount amount of of the the fine fine overpaid, overpaid, but but also also to to default default interest interest on on thatthat amount. amount.
Idet tilfrelde, hvor en bsde, som er pälagt en virksomhed for overtrredelse af EKSF-traktatens konkurrenceregler, er blevet annulleret eller nedsatved dom,pahviler der säledes Kommissionen en forpligtelse til helt eller i givet falddelvis at tilbagebetaleen bsde, den pägaldende virksomhed har betalt, i detomfang denne betaling mä anses for urigtigt erlagt ifolge annullationsafgorelsen.
It It stressed, stressed, in in that that connection, connection, that that a a failure failure to to reimburse reimburse suchsuch interest could result in the unjustenrichment of the Community, which would be be contrary contrary to to the the general general principles principles of of
Retten understregede i relation til dettepunkt, at undladelsenaf at betale disse renter kunne medfsreen ugrundet berigelse for Fallesskabet,som er i strid med frellesskabsrettensalmindelige retsgrundsatninger.Som folge af, at der principielt mätte givessagsogeren medhold i sogsmälet i henhold til artikel 34 KS, som blev indgivet,efter at der var hengäeten vis rimelig frist, blev der tilkendt sagsugeren enskonomisk erstatning pä et belsb svarende til de renter,som skulle have vreret betalt sammen med hovedstolen.
Article 34 CS, which was brought after a reasonable time hadpassed, was wellfounded in principle, compensation to the applicant corresponding to theamount of interest that should have been reimbursed together with the principal sum sum was was awarded awarded to to the the applicant.applicant.
For sä vidt angär fallesskabets ansvar for skader forvoldt private, fastslog Domstolen i Bergadermog Goupil-sagen (dom af 4.7.2000, sag C-352198 P, Sml.
Judgments in CaseT-533193 Boumav Council and Commission [20019ECR n-203(under appeal, CaseC-L62101 P), in Case T-73194 Beusmnns v Council and Commission
I, s. 5291), at den over for Kommissionen pätalte adfrerd skal bestä i en tilstrekkelig kvalificeret overtredelse af en retsregel, der har til formäl at tillegge rettigheder tilprivate.
[200U ECR l I2 23 (under appeal, Case C-163/01 P), in Case T-76194 Jansmnv Counciland Commission [200U ECR fAß and in Case T-L43197 Van den Bergv Council and Commission t200U ECR II-277 (under appeal, Case C-164/01 P).
Retten har inden for rammerne af de sager, den har afgjort i lsbet af är 2001, skullet bedsmme, offi disse to elementeraf ulovlighed, dvs. at dentilsidesatte regel har til formäl at tillegge rettigheder til private, og at overtredelsener tilstrekkelig kvalificeret, var bevist.
Judgment of 6 December 2001 in CaseT-196199 Area Cova and Others v Council andCommission, not yet published in the ECR.
Derimod tilhgger hverken den overenskomst, der oprettede WTO, og bilagenehertil (jf. dommene i sagerne Cordis mod Kommissionen,Bocchi Food Trade International mod Kommissionen og T. Port mod
As regards the liability of the Community for damage caused toindividuals, the Court of Justice held in CaseC-352 /98 P Bergadermand and
Kommissionen (sag T-52199)), eller artikel 253 EF fif. dommen i sagen EmesaSugar mod Rädet) eller princippet om relativ stabilitet - der er fastsat i lovgivningen pä fiskeriomrädet og har til formäl at sikre hver enkeltmedlemsstat en del af Fellesskabetssamlede tilladte fangstmengde (lf,ovennrvnte dom i sagen Area Cova m.fl. mod Kommissionen) borgernerettigheder.
Goupil [2000]ECR I-5291 that the conduct alleged against the Commission must must involve involve a a sfficiently sfficiently serious serious breach breach of of a a rule rule of of law law intended intended to to conferconfer rights on individuals. In the cases which it decided in 2001, the Court of FirstInstance had to assess whether those two aspects of illegality, that is to say,that the rule breached is intended to confer rights on individuals and that thebreach is sufficiently serious, were proven.
I ovennevnte dom i sagen Comafrica og Dole Fresh Fruit Europe modKommissionen fandt Retten, at stillet over for en skonsbefojelse,der erbegrrenset betragteligt, gsr konstateringen af en ulovlighed, som undertilsvarende omstandigheder ikke ville v & re blevet begäet af en normaltforsigtig og päpasselig administration, det muligt at konkludere, atinstitutionens adferd har udgjort et retsstridigt forhold, der kan pädrage Frellesskabet ansvar i henhold til artikel 288 EF.
99), 99), cited cited above ) , above ) , by Article 253 EC (Emesa Sugar v Council),or by the principle of relativestability - this principle, laid down by the fisheries legislation, is intended to ensure for each Member State a shareof the Community's total allowable catches catches
Henset til sagens forholdfastslog Retten, at de ulovligheder,Kommissionen begik ved vedtagelsen af deanfaegtede forordninger al, ikke var sädanneulovligheder, som en normalt
Commission, Commission, cited cited above).above).
De fastsläede ulovligheder bestod i, at der i forbindelse med fastsattelsen afnedsettelses/justeringskoefficienterne for fastlreggelsen af de mangder bananer, der skulle tillregges hver erhvervsdrivende i kategori A og B inden for rammerne aftoldkontingenterne, forelä eventuelle afvigelser mellem de tal, der var meddelt af denationale myndigheder, og tallene fra Det StatistiskeKontor for De Europreiske Fellesskaber (Eurostat) eller vedrorende andre oplysninger angäende de mrengderbananer, der blev markedsfsrt eller indfsrt i Fallesskabet under de pägeldendereferenceperioder.
As regards the question whether a breach of Community law is sufficientlyserious, the Court of First Instance applied a test which turned on the questionwhether the Community institution concerned had manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits on the discretion available to the institution, bearing inmind that where the institution in question had only a considerably reduced oreven no discretion, the mere infringement of Community law might besufficient to establish the existence of a sufficiently serious breach.
forsigtig og päpasselig administration under de samme omstrendigheder ikkeville have gjort sig skyldig i.
held that the mistakes made by the Commission when it adopted the contestedregulations ar did not constitute mistakes which would not have beencommitted in similar circumstances by an administrative authority exercisingordinary care and diligence.
I ovennrevnte dom i sagen Dieckmann & Hansen mod Kommissionenanerkendte Retten forst, at Kommissionen har en vid sksnsbefojelse,när den vedtager foranstaltninger til gennemforelse af ordningen for kontrol medindfsrslen af fiskerivarer, säsom optagelse af et tredjeland pä listen overtredjelande, hvorfra det er tilladt at indfsre sädanne varer til Frllesskabet, eller f,ernelseaf det derfra. Herefter fandt Retten, at denne institution ikkeäbenbart og groft havde overskredet grenserne for sine skonsbefojelser, da den genovervejedesin vurdering af Kasakhstansevne til for sä vidt angär kaviarat sikre, at der forelä sundhedsmassige betingelser, der mindst svarede tilkravene i direktiv 911493*, eller da den besluttedeat tilbagekalde sinbeslutning om tilladelse til at indfsre dette produkt til Fallesskabet. Rettenbemerkede bl.a., at Kommissionen ved at vedtageden omtvistede beslutningfuldt ud havde overholdt sine forpligtelser til med henblik pä forfolgelsen afformälene med den frelles landbrugspolitik at tage de almene hensynvedrsrende beskyttelsen af forbrugerne eller af menneskers og dyrs sundhed og liv i betragtning og til at tillregge beskyttelsen af den offentlige sundhedstsrre vegt end skonomiske overvejelser. Endelig bemerkede Retten i den ovenn & vnte dom i sagen Area Cova m.fl.mod Rädet og Kommissionen, at hvis princippet om et objektivt ansvar for Fellesskabet skal anerkendes i fellesskabsretten,forudsetter dette ansvarspätagelse, at tre betingelserkumulativt er opfyldt, nemlig at det pästäede tabforeligger, at der er ärsagssammenheng mellem tabet og den handling, derlegges Fallesskabets institutioner til last, samt at tabet har en usedvanlig ogserlig knrakter.
In its judgmentin Di ec f una nn & Hansenv Commission,cited above, the Courtof First Instance, first, recognised that the Commission has a wide discretion where where it it adopts adopts measures measures implementing implementing arrangements arrangements for for the the supervision supervision of of importationsof fishery products, such as whether a third countryis to beentered in or removed from the list of third countries authorised to export suchproducts to the Community. It went on to hold that the institution did notoverstep the boundsof its discretion in the present case when it reconsideredits assessment of Kazaktrstan's ability to ensure that, so far as concerns caviar,health conditions at least equivalent to those provided for by Directive 9tl493awere met and when it decided to withdrawits decision to authorise imports ofthe aforementioned product into the Community. The Court obserued interalia that, by adopting the contested decision, the Commission fully observedits obligations to take account of requirements relating to the public interestsuch as the protection of consumers or the protection of the health and life ofhumans and animals,in its efforts to achieve objectives of the commonagricultural policy and to accordto the protection ofpublic health precedenceover economic considerations. .
Med henblik pä at vurdere, om tabet, der udgjordes af enformindskelsen af sagsogernes muligheder for at fiske, havde en usredvanligkarakter, tog Retten stilling til, om det overskredgrenserne for de risici, derknytter sig til skonomisk virksomhed inden for fiskeriomrädet, og denkonkluderede endelig, at dette ikke var tilfaldet.
Finally, in its judgment in Area Cova and Others v Council andCommission, cited above, the Court of First Instance observed that in the eventof the principle of no-faultliability of the Community being recognised in Community law, a preconditionfor such liability would be the cumulativesatisfaction of three conditions, namely the reality of the damageallegedly allegedly suffered, suffered, the the causal causal link link between between it it and and the the act act on on the the part part of of the the
Rädets direktiv 9l/493/EgF af 22.7.1991(EFT L268, s. 15) fastserter desundhedsmessige betingelser for produktion og afsatningaf fiskerivarer bestemt til konsum.
CommunityCommunity institutions, and the unusual and specialna.ture of thatdarruge. In order to
Forelsbige forholdsregler
Applications ftlr interim relief
Rettens prresident modtog begreringer om forelobige forholdsregler inden fornresten alle sagsomräder,og navnlig inden for de omräder, der vedrorerkonkurrence ot, statsstotte 4, antidumpingforanstaltninger 45, fellesskabetsfinansieringer 46 og institutionel ret 47.
The judge hearing applications for interim relief heardapplications for interimmeasures in almost all fields of litigation, particularly those relating tocompetition, a3 State aid, a anti-dumping measures, a5 Communityfunding 6
Bl.a. kendelse afsagt af Rettens prresident den 17.1.2001, sag T-342l00 R, Petrolessenceog SG2R mod KommissionenS m, l. II,s.67,den 28.5.2001,sag T-53/01 R, Poste
Int*r alia" ürdsrs *f the President of th* {lerurtclf First Instance$f l?
Kendelse afsagt af Rettens president den 19.L2.?001, forenede sagerT-195/01 R og T-207101R, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser.
Case T-342100 R P*rolesssnrc ßnd,$ü2n v ü*mmissinru [?üü1] ECR II-67" üf ?8 Mayin ilase T-53/01 R PosteIralinne v Commrssi*n[2001] ECR II-14?9, of 26 Octobsr
Kendelse afsagt af Rettens prrsident den 1.8.2001, sag T-l32l0l R, Euroalliages m.fl.mod Kommissionen, Sml. II, s.2307 (ophavet ved kendelse afsagt af Domstolens president den 14.12.2001, sag C-404l01 P(R), Kommissionen mod Euroalliages m.fl.,endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser).
?üü1 in Case T-1841ü1 R IMS Heulth v Commission (under äppeal, Cass C-481/01P{R)}, üt' t5 November äüül in Case T-1511ü1R fra*lts ,sysrem Deutsr:kland vü*mnzissfon, tlt 2ü Decemher?üü1 in CaseT-:131ü1 R üslersir:hische Post sp n r Aa ss eru {lr;rutrnfssipn :lnri in CaseT-314iül R ffrtrik.furAr"brit und Wirtstkay?v {"-rrurrrssiunr nüt yet pul':lished in thn HüR" ü)idcr uf the Presiclent *t ihe {-*urt nl'First Instanee*f 19 üer:emh*r 2üütr rn J*insd{läses "t-J95/ül R and T-lül/ü1 R {J*vrrwnent r4l'üihralt*r v C*rnrni,s,si#ru, nü{ yst puf:lishnd in fheHCR. HCR.
Kendelse afsagt af Rettens prasident den 15.1.2001 , sagT-241/00 R, Le Canne modKommissionen, Srnl.
ürcler nf the Fresidentof the C*urt nf First Instanüe of I August 2ü01 in CaseT-132/ü1 T-132/ü1
II, s. 37, den 18.10.2001, sag T-196101 R, Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis mod Kommissionen, den 22.10.2001,sag T-141/01 R,Entorn mod Kommissionen, og den 7.12.2001, sag T-192l01 R, Lior modKommissionen, endw ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser.
Rffurnlrlliuges nntl üthers v Cotnmission [2üü11ECR t r I2 307 (annulled by ürder uf the P rr si de nt r:f the Caurt r:f Justice of 14 December 2001 in Case C-404/01 P t R )) , ncr yet puhlishedin the HCR).
Kendelse afsagt af Rettens prasident den 15. 1 .2001, sag T-236100 R, Staunerm.fl modParlamentet og Kommissionen, Sml.
ürders nf the Prssidentr:f'thn Cnurur:f First Instance of 15 January2üü1 in Case
Kendelse afsagt af Rettens prresident den 5.9,2001, sag T-74100R (appelsag C-M0l0I P(R)), Artegodan mod Kommissionen, den 12.9.2001, sag T-132l01 R,Euroalliages m.fl. mod Kommissionen, og den 8.10.2001 , sag T2 36 100 RII, Stauner m.fl. mod Parlamentet og Kommissionen, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser.
T-?411ü0R Is Cunnev Cmnrnission [2ü01] ECR II-3?, of 18 üctober 2001 in Cas*T-lqdfül R,4rislr,rrrfsf# P*nryistimio ?'hessntsnlfus v Carnmfssroru, rsf 22 Octaher20ü1 20ü1 in CascT-l41lti1 R Enton'rv t]*mrnissionand of ? December?001 in Casn T-192101R lrr:r v Comrmsslon, not yet puhlishecin the ECR.l l'17
Vedbeslutning af 27. december 2000 50 pälagde Kommissionen säledes DenItalienske Republik at bringe den overtradelse af artikel 82 EF, sammenholdtmed artikel 86, stk. 1, EF, til ophor,der bestod i til fordel for Poste Italianeat udelukke konkurrencen om levering pä bestemte dage eller tidspunkter iforbindelse med hybrid elektronisk post.
Amongst Amongst the the facie facie decisions dismissing such applications,that adopted in Poste ltaliane v judge judge
Da den af Poste Italiane hevdede skade var af skonomiskart, bragte Rettendet i erindring,at en sädan skade ikke, bortset fra ganske usedvanlige tilfrelde,kan betragtes som uoprettelig eller blot vanskeligt oprettelig, när der senerekan betales okonomisk erstatning herfor.
Commission Commission is is of of note note as as the the hearing hearing an an application application for for interim interim relief relief had had to assess whether the condition of urgency was fulfilled in a case concerningthe openingup to competition of services previously the preserve,in thisinstance, of Poste ltaliane.
Ved anvendelse af disse principperer den udsrettelse, der er fremsat begaring om, berettiget, säfremt det mäantages, at sagsageren, hvis der ikke treffes en sädan forholdsregel, befindersig i en situation, der kan true selve virksomhedens eksistens.
By decision of 2l December 2000, $ theCommission ordered the Italian Republic to end the infringement of Article 82EC in conjunction with Article 86(1) EC consisting in the exclusion ofcompetition, to the advantage of Poste Italiane, with respect to the day- ortime-certain deliveryphase of hybrid electronic mail services.
Men Rettentilfojede, at i det omfang Poste Italiane som en befordringspligtig virksomhedhar fäetoverdraget en opgave af almindelig okonomisk interesse i artikel 86,stk. 2, EF's forstand, hvis udfsrelse er v & sentlig, er den udsettelse, der erfremsat begering offi, ligeledes berettiget, säfremt det er godtgiort, atudelukkelsen fra det forbeholdteomräde af leveringsfasen for hybridelektronisk post pä en bestemtdag eller et bestemt tidspunkt forhindrersagsogeren i at udfsre den opgave, virksomheden er blevet betroet, indtil derer truffet afgorelse i hovedsagen.
As the damage alleged by Poste ltaliane was of a financial nature, the judgehearing the application for interim relief pointed out that such damage cannot,save in exceptional circumstances, be regarded as irreparable or even as reparable reparable with with diffrculty, diffrculty, since since it it may may ultimately ultimately be be the the subject subject of of financialfinancial compensation.