natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I klagen blev der også gjort indsigelse mod behandling af klagerens data under henvisning til artikel 18. EDPS konkluderede efter at have indhentet yderligere oplysninger til belysning af situationen, at forvaltningen havde givet adgang til alle de ønskede dokumenter med undtagelse af en enkelt e-post, idet forvaltningen ikke havde tilstrækkelige oplysninger til at kunne identificere dokumentet.
One of the parties concerned requested access to the report, but this was refused to him by the Court on the basis that he was ‘a person not concerned about the report’. e EDPS endeavoured in this case to examine the scope of a person’s right of access under Article 13 and possible limitations to this right under Article 20. e handling of the case included an on-the-spot visit by the Assistant Supervisor and a member of his team notably to gain access to the content of this report and the reports on interviews carried out by the investigator. e EDPS issued a decision in which he found that the complainant is entitled to have access to any outcome of the inquiry which concerns him. e only exceptions should be where data reveals information not related in any way to the complainant and the outcome of reports with witnesses. e EDPS therefore requested that the Court of Auditors give further, although not complete, access to the investigation report to the complainant. e implementation is still pending.
En EU-borger indgav en klage over Europa-Parla-mentet (EP) vedrørende Parlamentets praksis med hensyn til videoovervågning (2006-185). Klageren mente, at overvågningen uden for EP’s bygninger i Bruxelles var ude af proportioner.
An EU citizen launched a complaint against the European Parliament (EP) concerning its videosurveillance practices (2006-185). e complainant challenged the proportionality of surveillance outside EP buildings in Brussels.
Han gav også udtryk for, at offentligheden ikke blev tilstrækkeligt informeret.
He also claimed that the notice provided to the public was insufficient.
EDPS henstillede i sin afgørelse, at EP sørger for bedre information af offentligheden samt justerer opsætningen af overvågningskameraerne. EDPS lagde især vægt på at sikre, at demonstranter ikke blev overvåget af EP, enten forsætligt eller utilsigtet, da dette kunne hæmme ytringsfriheden.
In its decision, the EDPS required the EP to improve the notice provided to the public and to adjust the positioning of the surveillance cameras. e main focus of the EDPS was to ensure that demonstrators are not monitored by the EP, either purposefully, or incidentally, as this could have an inhibiting effect on free speech.
I forbindelse med opfølgningen af EDPS’ udtalelse fortsatte han samarbejdet med EP om en forbedring af praksis for videoovervågning under hensyntagen til EP’s særlige sikkerhedsbehov, herunder sikkerheden i forbindelse med besøg af statschefer eller andre betydningsfulde personer, der har brug for øget beskyttelse, idet disse behov ikke var tilgodeset i EDPS’ oprindelige afgørelse.
During the followup to his opinion, the EDPS continued to work with the EP to improve its videosurveillance practices taking into account the special security needs of the EP, including securing visits of Heads of States or other VIPs requiring increased protection, which were not addressed in the initial EDPS decision.
I forbindelse med denne klage iværksatte EDPS også en rundspørge blandt EU-institutionerne og-organerne, og han påbegyndte udarbejdelsen af en række retningslinjer for videoovervågning, som efter planen vil være færdige i 2007.
In connection with the complaint, the EDPS also initiated a survey among the EU institutions and bodies, and commenced work on a set of videosurveillance guidelines, which is planned to be finalised during 2007.
En klage (2006-436) vedrørte retten til omgående berigtigelse af ufuldstændige data (artikel 14) vedrørende karriereforløbet (»historique de carrière«) i Sysper 2 (Europa-Kommissionens informationssystem for HR-området, der omfatter flere moduler).
A complaint was introduced against the Director-ate-General for Personnel and Administration of the European Commission claiming a right of access under Article 13 to certain documents concerning the complainant and the right to rectify certain data under Article 14 (2006-266). e complaint also invoked Article 18 to object to the processing of the complainant’s data.
Selv om Kommissionen bestred, at dataene skulle være ufuldstændige, var den indstillet på at indføje et felt til bemærkninger i rubrikken med klagerens karriereforløb.
After further requests for clarification of the situation, the EDPS concluded that the administration had provided access to all the documents required to the exception of one email for which the administration did not detain enough information to identify the document.
EDPS godtog dette forslag som en foreløbig løsning og udbad sig derudover forklaringer med hensyn til de tekniske vanskeligheder ved berigtigelse af oplysninger om karriereforløb i Sysper 2.
As concerns the exercise of the right of rectification, the EDPS reiterated his position that the right of rectification cannot be applied to subjective data on grounds of inaccuracy.
Både den midlertidige løsning og forklaringerne er under behandling.
Finally, as concerns the possibility of objecting to the processing on the basis of Article 18 of the regulation, the EDPS considered that the complainant failed to invoke ‘compelling legitimate grounds’.
Klage over en undersøgelse iværksat af en DPO til overvejelse, der var truffet af en national databeskyttelsesmyndighed; dette falder uden for hans beføjelser.
Right of rectification and blocking rejected the complaint. is aspect is now also before the European Ombudsman.
DPO’en har anmodet om en fornyet vurdering, og klagerens bemærkninger afventes.
Both the interim solution and the explanations are pending.
Offentliggørelse i årsberetningen for 2005
Complaint against an investigation by a DPO
Et eksempel herpå var en EU-ansat, der klagede over at have modtaget politisk oplysningsmateriale på sin kontoradresse fra et parti i forbindelse med et valg i sin oprindelsesmedlemsstat. I det pågældende tilfælde kunne det ikke udelukkes, at institutionen havde videregivet kontoradressen til medlemsstatens faste repræsentation.
Out of the 52 complaints received in 2006, 42 were declared not admissible for reason of lack of competence of the EDPS. is constitutes a twofold increase compared to 2005. e vast majority of these complaints do not concern personal data processing by an EC institution or body; but they concern exclusively processing on a national level.
Klagen drejede sig imidlertid om et politisk parti, underlagt den nationale lovgivning, der havde benyttet sig af denne oplysning. Klageren fik derfor de nationale databeskyttelsesmyndigheders kontaktoplysninger, samt en forklaring på, hvorfor EDPS ikke havde kompetence til at behandle sagen.
Some of these complaints asked the EDPS to reconsider a position taken by a national data protection authority; which falls outside of his mandate. e complainants were informed that the European Commission would be competent in the event of a Member State failing to implement Directive 95/46/EC correctly.
En ny klage blev indgivet i forbindelse med opfølgningen af en sag, der blev omtalt i årsberetningen for 2005 (2005-190), og som klageren efterfølgende er gået videre med i en klage til Den Europæiske Ombudsmand.
A complaint was received against an investigation carried out by a data protection officer (2006-451). e investigation by the DPO followed a request for access to a recalled e-mail. e complainant questioned whether this investigation was within the competence of the DPO, whether the procedure followed by the DPO was in conformity with the law and whether the measures adopted by the DPO respected the principles of proportionality, good faith and due diligence.
Klageren gjorde også indsigelse mod den kortfattede redegørelse for hans sag i årsberetningen for 2005, idet han mente, at redegørelsen havde været ukorrekt og forhastet.
After carrying out an investigation into the facts of the case, and requesting further clarifications from the parties concerned, the EDPS concluded that the launching of the investigation was to be considered as lawful not only because the DPO could base his action on powers granted in the annex to the regulation, but also because the investigation was triggered by a request for access under Article 13 of the regulation.
Det store antal afviste klager, navnlig vedrørende sager på nationalt plan, har medført, at der på det nye websted mere eksplicit oplyses om, hvad EDPS’ kompetenceområde omfatter. Dette har også vist sig at være relevant i forbindelse med andragender til Europa-Parlamentet vedrørende databeskyttelsesspørgsmål, der undertiden sendes til EDPS med henblik på bemærkninger eller rådgivning.
ree cases concerned processing of personal data of EC staff members, although the substance of the complaints was not on the processing done by an institution or body. e complaints thus involved entities of the EU administration that need to comply with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, although the alleged data protection breaches concerned processing on the national scene.
Hvis spørgsmålet udelukkende vedrører det nationale niveau eller ikke involverer behandling af personoplysninger i en fællesskabsinstitution eller et fællesskabsorgan, har EDPS ingen kompetence i sagen og kan kun videregive generelle oplysninger, så Udvalget for Andragender får mulighed for at afgøre, hvilke skridt der bør tages.
One such example was a staff member complaining about having received political information to his office address from a party in relation to elections in the Member State of his origin.
Samarbejdet med Den Europæiske Ombudsmand
In that case, it could not be excluded that the office address was provided by the institution to the permanent representation of the Member State.
I henhold til artikel 195 i EF-traktaten er Den Europæiske Ombudsmand beføjet til at modtage klager over tilfælde af fejl eller forsømmelser i forbindelse
However, the complaint was about a political party, acting under national law, having used this information. erefore, contact details of national data protection authorities were provided, along with an explanation of why the EDPS was not competent to deal with the case.
Langt hovedparten af disse klager vedrører ikke behandling af personoplysninger i en EF-insti-tution eller et EF-organ, men vedrører udelukkende behandling på nationalt plan.
One additional complaint arose in the context of the followup to a case mentioned in the annual report 2005 (2005-190), and subsequently pursued by complainant in a complaint to the European Ombudsman. e complainant also objected to the brief presentation of his case in the annual report 2005, stating that it had been incorrect and premature. e EDPS e high number of inadmissible complaints, particularly as to issues on the national level, has resulted in more explicit information on the new website as to the scope of the EDPS’ competence. is subject has also turned out to be relevant for petitions to the European Parliament on data protection issues, which are sometimes referred to the EDPS for comments or advice.
I nogle af klagerne blev EDPS anmodet om at tage en afgørelse op
If the issue is exclusively on the national level or does not involve the processing of personal data by a Community institution or body, the EDPS is not
Det videre arbejde på klageområdet
Collaboration with the European Ombudsman
Tilsvarende kan klager, der indgives til EDPS, være relateret til klager, som ombudsmanden tidligere helt eller delvis har truffet afgørelse om.
Likewise, complaints brought before the EDPS may concern complaints which have already been, partially or totally, the object of a decision by the Ombudsman.
Den assisterende tilsynsførende og en medarbejder deltog i de nationale databeskyttelsesmyndigheders seminar om behandling af klagesager i marts 2006 i Madrid.
The Assistant Supervisor and a member of staff attended the national data protection authorities’ case-handling workshop in Madrid in March 2006.
På dette seminar fremlagde den assisterende tilsynsførende et oplæg om EDPS’ arbejde med forudgående kontrol. Tre medarbejdere deltog også i et sådant seminar i oktober 2006 i Athen, hvor de fremlagde et oplæg om EDPS’ undersøgelse af videoovervågning.
During this workshop the Assistant Supervisor gave a presentation on prior checking by the EDPS. ree members of staff also attended a similar workshop in Athens in October 2006 and gave a presentation on the videosurveillance survey carried out by the EDPS.
I 2006 udførte EDPS en række undersøgelser på forskellige områder, hvoraf enkelte særligt skal nævnes i denne årsberetning.
During 2006, the EDPS conducted a number of inquiries in different areas, a few of which merit special attention in this report.
Foranlediget af en skrivelse fra en databeskyttelsesmyndighed i en medlemsstat blev der foretaget en indledende undersøgelse i forbindelse med Europa-Kommissionens storstilede undersøgelse af elsektoren (2005-207).
Peter Hustinx, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros and Joaquín Bayo Delgado, after the signing of the memorandum of understanding.
For at undgå unødigt dobbeltarbejde og så vidt muligt sikre en konsekvent stillingtagen til såvel de generelle som de specifikke databeskyttelsesspørgsmål, som klagerne rejser, blev der i november 2006 undertegnet et aftalememorandum mellem Den Europæiske Ombudsmand og EDPS.
Further to a letter received from a data protection authority in one of the Member States, a preliminary inquiry was conducted in relation to the European Commission’s large-scale inquiry carried out in the electricity sector (2005-207).
Kommissionen havde udsendt forskellige typer spørgeskemaer til en række forskellige elselskaber i 23 medlemsstater.
e Commission had sent different formats of questionnaires to various kinds of electricity companies based in 23 Member States.
Årsberetning 2006 ter beskyttelse af personoplysninger, og at reglerne om fortrolighed ikke forhindrer, at de relevante myndigheder informeres rettidigt, når det er nødvendigt.
Annual Report 2006 were unlawfully collected in the framework of the Commission’s sector inquiry, the EDPS carried out a preliminary inquiry: requesting and analysing the questionnaires, conducting an on-the-spot visit and meeting with staff at the Competition DG for clarifying some aspects of the information processing in the Commission’s inquiry.
Endelig opfordrede EDPS Den Europæiske Centralbank til at benytte sin centrale rolle som beslutningstager til at sikre, at de europæiske betalingssystemer er i overensstemmelse med EU-lovgivningen om databeskyttelse.
Finally, the EDPS called on the ECB to use its central role as policymaker with a view to ensuring that European payment systems are compliant with European data protection law.
På baggrund af en første vurdering bad EDPS generaldirektoratet om at sikre, at der ikke blev foretaget behandling af personoplysninger i forbindelse med Kommissionens undersøgelse, og han henstillede, at der blev truffet specifikke foranstaltninger med henblik herpå.
On the basis of his initial findings, the EDPS requested the DG to ensure that personal data would not be processed in the Commission’s inquiry, and recommended specific measures to this effect.
I november 2006 fremlagde Generaldirektoratet for Konkurrence en rapport om gennemførelse af en række tiltag i overensstemmelse med EDPS’ forslag, som bl.a. omfattede udførlig kontrol med de indsamlede data og specifik information af direktoratets ansatte.
In November 2006, Competition DG presented a report on the implementation of a series of actions, along the lines suggested by the EDPS, and including detailed checks on data collected and providing specific information to its staff.
På baggrund af denne rapport, der giver sikkerhed for, at ingen personoplysninger vedrørende elforbrugere er blevet eller vil blive behandlet i forbindelse med Kommissionens undersøgelse af elsektoren, besluttede EDPS at afslutte sin indledende undersøgelse af denne sag.
Further to this report, ensuring that no personal data relating to electricity consumers were, nor will be processed in the course of the Commission’s enquiry in the electricity sector, the EDPS decided to close his preliminary inquiry in this case.
I 2007 vil EDPS nøje overvåge udviklingen i denne sag for at sikre, at EF-institutionernes betalinger udføres i fuld overensstemmelse med databeskyttelsesforordningen.
During 2007, the EDPS will closely monitor the developments of this case with a view to ensuring that payment operations of Community institutions are carried out in full compliance with the data protection regulation.
Set i et større perspektiv vil EDPS i samarbejde med andre nationale databeskyttelsesmyndigheder fortsat udnytte sin rådgivende rolle til at sikre, at udformningen af de europæiske betalingssystemer ikke krænker privatlivets fred for bankkunder i EU.
In a broader perspective, the EDPS, in cooperation with other national data protection authorities, will keep using his consultative role in order to ensure that the architecture of European payment systems does not impinge on the privacy of EU banks’ customers.
Andre undersøgelser
Other inquiries
I 2006 indledte EDPS en undersøgelse af overførsler af EU-borgeres bankoplysninger til USA’s myndigheder via Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (»SWIFT«) (2006-357).
In 2006, the EDPS initiated an inquiry on the transfers of European citizen’s banking data to US authorities through the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) (2006-357).
Som nævnt i punkt 2.4.2 foretog den assisterende tilsynsførende og en af hans medarbejdere også en undersøgelse i forbindelse med en klage over Revisionsretten (2006-239).
As mentioned in paragraph 2.4.2, the Assistant Supervisor and a member of his team also carried out an investigation in the frame of a complaint against the Court of Auditors (2006-239). is on-the-spot visit enabled the Assistant Supervisor to gain access to the full report of which access had been partly refused to the complainant.
Dette besøg på stedet gav den assisterende tilsynsførende mulighed for at få indsigt i hele rapporten, som klageren delvis var blevet nægtet indsigt i.
An on-the-spot visit to the videosurveillance control room of the European Parliament was also made in the framework of the complaint on videosurveillance against the European Parliament (2006-185).
Efter at denne sag var blevet bragt op i medierne i juni 2006, skrev EDPS til Den Europæiske Centralbank og udbad sig oplysninger om bankens rolle som bruger af såvel som tilsynsførende med SWIFT.
After the news on this issue broke in the media in June 2006, the EDPS sent a letter to the European Central Bank, asking for information on its role as a user as well as an overseer of SWIFT.
Desuden deltog EDPS i en høring, som Europa-Parlamentet afholdt i oktober, og han bidrog aktivt til den udtalelse som Artikel 29-Gruppen vedtog i november.
Furthermore, the EDPS took part in a hearing organised by the European Parliament in October and actively contributed to the opinion adopted by the Article 29 Working Party in November.
EDPS er ved at udforme sin forretningsorden, jf. artikel 46, litra k), i forordning (EF) nr. 45/2001. Den vil også omfatte nogle bestemmelser om undersøgelser og vil blive vedtaget inden længe.
e EDPS is working on rules of procedure as provided for under Article 46(k) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. ese will include some provisions on inquiries and will be adopted shortly.
I oktober mødtes EDPS i Frankfurt med formanden for Den Europæiske Centralbank for at udveksle yderligere oplysninger om, hvor langt EDPS var nået med undersøgelsen, samt for at indhente supplerende oplysninger om ECB’s rolle.
In October, the EDPS had a meeting in Frankfurt with the President of the European Central Bank, with a view to exchanging further information on the state of play of the EDPS’ inquiry and to get additional information on the role of the ECB.
Efter at EDPS havde modtaget yderligere relevante dokumenter og faktuelle oplysninger fra både SWIFT og ECB, sendte han i december sit udkast til udtalelse til ECB med henblik på bemærkninger.
In December, after receiving further relevant documents and factual information from both SWIFT and the ECB, the EDPS sent his draft opinion to the ECB for comments.
EDPS arbejder også på at udforme en inspektionsstrategi med det formål at fastlægge nogle rammer og fremgangsmåder for inspektioner.
After carefully analysing the ECB’s comments, the EDPS adopted his final opinion early in 2007. e opinion deals with the different roles played by the ECB in this case.
Som input for dette arbejde er der indhentet oplysninger om eksisterende standarder for inspektioner fra de nationale databeskyttelsesmyndigheder og fra andre EU-institutioner.
As a SWIFT customer, the ECB, e EDPS is also working on an inspection policy with the aim of establishing a framework and methodology for his inspections.
EDPS’ inspektionsstrategi vil i første omgang fokusere på overholdelse af reglerne senest i foråret 2007, hvad angår udpegning af en databeskyttelsesansvarlig inden for Fællesskabets institutioner og organer samt anmeldelse med henblik på forudgående kontrol.
Information on existing standards of inspections has been gathered from national data protection authorities and from other EU institutions serving as input for this work. e initial focus of the inspection policy of the EDPS will be compliance by spring 2007 in the field of appointment of a DPO in
2.6.Administrative foranstaltninger rettigheder, anmeldelser osv. Han hilste den forudgående høring af EDPS før bedømmelsen af DPO’en velkommen og foreslog, at den assisterende DPO også omfattes.
Community institutions and bodies, and notification for prior checking. e policy will subsequently be broadened to monitoring full compliance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
EDPS blev hørt om og fremsatte bemærkninger om mange andre administrative foranstaltninger.
Many other administrative measures were the object of consultation and comments by the EDPS.
Forordningen fastsætter, at EDPS har ret til at blive underrettet om administrative foranstaltninger, der vedrører behandling af personoplysninger.
A very meaningful one has been the consultation by the Chair of the College of the Heads of Administration on a draft note about the conservation delay for medical data (2006-532). e EDPS opinion has been issued early in 2007, underlining the need to change the general time limit from minimum to maximum and to set several shorter periods for specific cases, without prejudice of some exceptions beyond the maximum 30 years period (asbestosis, etc.).
EDPS kan afgive sin udtalelse enten på anmodning af institutionen eller organet eller på eget initiativ. Artikel 46, litra d), styrker dette mandat med hensyn til forordningens gennemførelsesbestemmelser og især bestemmelserne vedrørende de databeskyttelsesansvarlige (artikel 24, stk. 8).
e regulation provides for a right of the EDPS to be informed about administrative measures which relate to the processing of personal data. e EDPS may issue his opinion, either following a request from the institution or body or on his own initiative.