natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Retten fandt, at Kommissionen havde anvendt denneartikel, der, som en undtagelse fra den almindelige ordning i forordning nr.404193, skal fortolkes indskrrenkende, pä rimelig mäde ved at antage, at denkun forpligtede Kommissionen til at kompensere for de omkostninger, som denpägreldende erhvervsdrivende mätte aftrolde for at tilpasse sig den nyeretstilstand. Kommissionen blev frifundet.
In the case in point, since the programme of work together with a plannedbudget, submitted at the time of the application for financial assistance, had beenaccepted by the Commission, the latter could not, without infringing the principlesof the protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty, regard an activityenvisaged in the initial budget as ineligible and consequently reduce the financialassistance as regards the approvedamount.
Endelig fastslog retten i den ovenn & vnte dom af 8. juni 2000, Camar og Ticomod Kommissionen og Rädet, der bl.a. var anlagt pä grundlag af EF-traktatens artikel 175 (nu artikel 232 EF), at Kommissionen ulovligt havde aftroldt sig frapägrundlagaf artikel 30 iforordning m.404193 at treffe de foranstaltninger,der var nodvendige for at gore det muligt for sagsogeren at overvinde sine forsyningsvanskeligheder. svanskeligheder.
- Finally, in the judgment of 14 December 2000 in Case T-105199CEMR v Commission the question was raised as to whether the Commission may effect setoff against entities to which Community funds are owed but which alsoowe sumsof Community origin. In the circumstances of the case, the Court, taking accountof the principle of the effectiveness of Community law which implies that thefunds of the Community are to be made available and used in accordance withtheir purpose, held that the Commission was not entitled to adopt a decisioneffecting setoff between its and the applicant's mutual claims without firstensuring that the decision did not posea risk for the use of the Community fundsfor the purposes for which they were intended and for the carrying out of certainactivities, when it could have acted otherwise without jeopardising the recoveryof the applicant's alleged debt to it and the proper use of the contestedsums. sums.
Varemrerker
Staff cases
Retspraksis inden for omrädet for varem & rker er blevet udvidet med flere domme, hvis bidrag vedrorer bedsmmelsen af de i forordning (EF) m. 40194 n.
A substantial number of judgments were delivered in staff cases. Among thejudgments, a circumstancesufficiently rare to be noted is the finding that a
fastsattevitkär for registrering af et EF-varemrerke
Community institution misusedits powers fiudgmentsof 16 June 2000 in Case T-84/98 C v Council and of 12 December 2000 in Case T-223199Dejaffi v
Den ovenn & vnte domi sagen Procter & Gamble mod KHIM (formen pä et stykke sebe) visersäledes, at en sag anlagt ved et appelkalnmermed det formäI, at fä ophevet Rädets forordning (EF) nr. 40194 af 20.I2.1993 om EF-varemrerker (EFT 1994,L 11,s. 1).
AduanasPujol Rubio and Others v Council and Commission, of 16 June 2000 in Joined CasesT-611197 and T-619197to T-627197Transfluvia and Others v Council and Commission, and of 26 June 2000 in Joined CasesT-I2198 and T1 3 / 98 Argon andAnotherv Council and Commission; andjudgments of 21 June2000 in Case T-429193Le Goff and Others v Council and in Case T-537193Tromeur v Council and Commission, of 27 June 2000 in Case T-72199 Meyer v Commission (under appeal, Case C-301/00 P), and \n Eurocoton and Others v Council, cited above).
undersogerens afslag pä registrering af et EF-varemrerke pä grundlag af enabsolut hindring, sretter dette kammer i underssgerens situation for sä vidtangär undersogelsen af, om ansogningen om registrering af et varemaerkeskulle imsdekonxnes.Det folger heraf, at appelkammeret i medfsr af artikel62, stk. 1, iforordning m.40194 er befojettil at genoptagebehandlingenafansogningen under hensyn til de absolutte hindringer for registrering,der ernaevnt i artikel 7 i forordning nr. 40194, uden at det er begrrenset afundersogerens argumentation. Derimod havde appelkammeret vedefterfolgende ex officio at antage, at der forelä formelle mangler, som ikke varblevet gjort geldende af underssgeren, overskredetsin kompetence.Säfremt Säfremt undersogerenfra startenhavde afuist ansogningen med den begrundelse, atansogningen var beheftet med formelle mangler, havde sagsogeren entenkunnet päklage undersogerens afuisning til appelkammeret eller straks kunnetindgive en ny ansogning om registrering af et varemrerke til KHIM.
In Camar and Tico v Commission and Council, the Court held that a decision bywhich the Commission refused to take provisional measures to allow the annualquantity allocatedto the applicant for the purpose of obtainingimport licences fortraditional ACP bananas to be calculatedon the basis of the quantities which itmarketed in 1988, 1989 and 1990 - even if it was based on Article 30 of Regulation No 404193 on the common organisation of the market in bananas, aprovision which obliges the Commission to take the transitional measures itjudgesnecessary to assist the transition from national arrangements to the commonorganisationof the market in bananas and which gives the Commission broaddiscretionary power - was nevertheless an individual decision and thereforeadministrative in nature.
Hertil kommer, at det i artikel 73 i forordning nr. 40194 fastsläedegrundlreggende princip i fellesskabsretten, hvorefter retten til kontradiktionskal beskyttes, pälregger appelkammeret at give parten adgang til atfremkomme med bemrerkninger til de absolutte registreringshindringer for et EF-varemrerke , som det ex officio har lagt til grund.
In Fresh Marine Company v Commission, the Court for the first time awardeddamages to an undertaking in an antidumping case without the undertakinghaving to prove that the defendant institution had committed a sufficiently seriousbreachof a superior rule of law for the protection of individuals.
Retten fandt, atappelkammeret, idet det ikke havde givet parten denne mulighed for atfremsrette bemrerkninger, havde tilsidesat sagsogerens ret til kontradiktion.
In principle,the measures of the Council and Commission in connection with a proceedingrelating to the possible adoption of antidumping measures must be regarded asconstituting legislative action involving choices of economic policy, so that the Community can incur liability by virtue of such measures only if there has beena sufficiently serious breach.
Retten er blevet anmodet om at udtale sig om betingelserne for aktindsigt idokumenter26fra Kommissionen(domaf 13.9.2000, sag T-20199, Denkavit Nederland mod Kommissionen, af 12.10.2000, sag T- 123199, JT's Corporationmod Kommissionen, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser) og fra Rädet(domaf6.4.2000, sag T-188/98, Kuijermod Rädet, Sml.II,s.1959(appelsag : C-239100 P)).
However, where the operation in question, of anadministrative nature, does not involve any choices of economic policy andconfers on the Commission only very little or no discretion, mere infringementof Community law is sufficient to lead to the noncontractual liability of the Community.
- Dommen i sagen Kuijer mod Rädet ophrevede Rädets afgorelse om ikke atgive aktindsigt i visse dokumenter vedrsrende Oplysnings-, Analyse- og
In the case in point, the Commission did not take account of corrections ofclerical errors contained in a report drawn up by the applicant, Fresh Marine Company , when checking whether the latter had complied with an undertaking notto sell its products in the Community below an average price in order to avoid theapplication of antidumping duties.
När der, som det var tilfreldet i sagen, foreligger serligeomstrendigheder, kan den konkrete sammenh & rg, en afgorelse trreffes i,skrerpe begrundelseskravene. I det omfang, hvor sagsogeren under procedurenvedrsrende begreringen om aktindsigt i dokumenter har fremfsrtomstaendigheder, der kan rejse tvivl offi, hvorvidt det fsrste afslag varholdbart, skal Rädet säledes besvareden bekrreftende begering med angivelseaf grundenetil, at de pägeldende omstrendigheder ikke har kunnet medfsre,at institutionen rendrede sit synspunkt.
That finding allowed the Court to conclude that the institution'sconduct amounted to an illegality such as to render the Community liable.
C-ZSZtggP) " , at Rädet skulle have undersogt muligheden for at give delvis aktindsigt i de dokumenter, der var begreret aktindsigt i.
In addition to applications for interim relief made in the field of competition law(orders of the President of the Court of First Instance of 14 April 2000 in Case T1 44 199 F.EPI v Commission, of 28 June 2000 in Case T-191/98 P.II Cho Yang Shipping v Commission and of 14 December 2000 in Case T-5/00 R FEG v Commission - under appeal, Case C-710I P(R)) and in staff cases, there werea number of applications for the suspension of operation of decisions authorisingthe marketing of a medicinal product (order of the President of the Court of FirstInstance of 7 April 2000 in Case T-326199R Olivieri v Commission) or,conversely, withdrawing authorisation.
- Det var ogsä ved at baseresig direkte pä dommen i sagenHautala mod Rädet og af de samme grunde som i dommen i sagen Kuijer mod Rädet, at Retten i dommen i sagen JT's Corporation mod Kommissionen annulleredeKommissionens afgorelse, i det omfang den afslog aktindsigt i vissedokumenter (tjenesterejserapporterne samt brevvekslingen mellem Kommissionen og nangtadesh's regering) under henvisning til undtagelsen medhensyntil beskyttelsen af offentlige interesser (inspektioner og undersogelser)
In Artegodan v Commission, the President held that, notwithstanding thepreponderance which unquestionablyhad to be given to the requirements of theprotection of public health as against economic considerations,the balance ofinterests inclined towards suspension of operation of the Commission decisionwithdrawing marketing authorisation for a medicinal product inasmuch as the Commission had not succeeded in demonstratingthat the protective measurescontained in a previous decision, which were based on facts identical to those
- Dommen i sagen Denkavit mod Kommissionen stadfestede Kommissionensafslagpä at give aktindsigt i Kommissionens rapport om en inspektionvedrsrende bekrempelse af svinepesti Nederlandene, der var begrundet i de obligatoriske undtagelser, der gär ud pä at beskytte henholdsvis offentligeinteresser(navnliginspektionerogundersogelser)ogforretningshemmeligheder.
In a quite different field, an application for interim relief was granted by orderof 2 May 2000 in Case T-I7_BAR_00R Rothley and Others v Parliament, a casebrought by 7 _BAR_ Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) against the Parliament concerning the manner in which investigations are conductedby the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
De frellesskabsbestemmelser, der regulerer betingelserne for godtgorelse afeller fritagelse for import- eller eksportafgifter (bl.a. artikel 13 i forordning(EOF) nr. 1430179) 2e har endnu engang udgjort det centrale i en sag.
The regulation provides , inter alia, that the OLAF may conduct investigations within the institutions, the latterbeing informed when the OLAF's employees conduct an investigation on theirpremises or consult a document or request information held by them.
Veddom af 18. januar 2000, sag T-290197, tr[ehibas Dordtselaan mod Kommissionen (Sml.
In November 1999 the Parliament adopted a decisionamending its Rules of Procedure, making it possible to apply the rules providedfor by the interinstitutional agreement.
II, s. 15)blev Kommissionen frifundet i en sag, der rejstetvivl om lovligheden af en kommissionsbeslutning, hvorved der var blevet meddelt afslag pä en ansogning indgivet af Kongeriget Nederlandene omgodtgorelse af landbrugsafgifter til sagsogeren.
The legality of that decision waschallenged before the Court by a number of MEPs, who also sought itssuspension.
Sagsogeren var en toldspeditor,der skulle have betalt hojere landbrugsafgifterend de afgifter, speditoren allerede havde betalt, idet vrrdien af de indfsrtevarer i virkelighedenvar hojere end den verdi, der var blevet angivet. Dennefejl i angivelsen var en folge af, at de fakturaer, importoren havde fremlagt for
In the order, the President of the Court of First Instance considered whether theconditions for granting interim relief were met, having first found that theapplicationfor relief was admissibte because the contested decision was capableof producing legal effects going beyond the mere internal organisation of the Parliament ' s work and of being of direct and individual concern to the applicants.
Forordning (EgF) nr. 1430179 af 2.7 .1979 om godtgorelse af eller fritagelse for importeller eksportafgifter (EFT L 125,s. 1).
Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8April 1965 in the light of their context and purpose and with regard to the timeat which they were adopted, he did not exclude the possibility that the Protocolprotected MEPs against certain actions by the institutions or Community organs,such as the OLAF, since those actions might be preliminary to legal proceedingsbefore a national court and might hinder the internal working of the Parliament.
I denne anden beslutning fandt Kommissionen navnlig, at denomstrendighed, at fakturaer senere viser sig at vare ukorrekte, udgor enerhvervsrisiko, som enhver person, der indgiver toldangivelser,mä brere,hvorfor den omstandighed säledes ikke i sig selv kunne betragtes som etsrerligt forhold.
The President then considered whether the contested decision contained provisionsensuring that the immunity of MEPs would not be compromised;he found that it did not contain any specific guarantee with regard to respect for the rights of MEPS when the OLAF exercisedits powers of investigation.
Retten fastslog i denne dom, at den procedure, som Kommissionen afsluttedemed vedtagelsen af den anden beslutning, var beheftet med uregelmassigheder.
In particular, the OLAF employees could have access to MEPs' offices within the Parliament, intheir absence or without their consent, in order to obtain certain information.
Det var imidlertid ikke blevet godtgjort,at proceduren, hvis de konstaterede uregelmressigheder ikke havde foreligget,ville have fsrt til en beslutning, der var forskellig fra den anfregtede beslutning.
Thecondition relating to urgency was therefore satisfiedsince, if interim relief hadnot been granted, the MEPs would have been at risk of suffering serious and irreparabledamage. damage.
Endvidere fandt Retten ikke, at Kommissionen havde anlagt et äbenbartfejlskon i sin vurdering af bestemmelserne i artikel 13 i forordning nr.L430179, da den fastslog, at fremleggelse, endog i god tro, af dokumenter,som senere viser sig at v€ere forfalskede eller unojagtigeikke i sig selv udgoret srerligt forhold, der kan begrunde en fritagelse eller en tilbagebetaling af importafgifter.
Finally, the President weighed the competing interests and considered that, whileit was unarguably in the Community's interest to prevent and to combatfraud andany other illegal activity detrimentalto the financial interests of the Community,it was equally in the Community's interest that MEPs should be able to carry outtheir activities with the assurance that their independence would not be compromised.
15.6.2000, sag T-2II198, F mod KommissionenS r n , l. Pers.
Case number
II, s. 2067), af28.6.2000, sag T-191/98 R, Cho Yang Shipping mod Kommissionen, (Srnl.
Names of the parties the Commission(Decision
II, s. 2085), der vedrsrte en tvist mellem 7I
Amounts of thefines imposed bythe Court of FirstInstance
ttCement" -sager: bsder
CimenteriesCBR v Commission
Bode pälagt af Komissionen (beslutning94t8r5/EFaf 30.11.1994)
Hornos lböricos Alba (Hisalba) v Commission
Sammensretning af Retten i Fsrste Instans
Composition of the Court of First Instance
Anden Anden rekke, rekke, venstre venstre til til hojre:hojre: fra fra
Judge K. Lenaerts; Judge J. Pirrung; Judge P. Lindh.
Dommerne N.J. Forwood, P. Mengozzi, M. Jaeger, R.M. Moura Ramos, A. Potocki, J.D.
Second Second row, row, lefi lefi to to right i right i from from
Retten i Fsrste Instans' medlemmer(efter tiltrredelsestidspunkt)
1.The Members of the Court of First Instance(in order of their entry into office)
Fsdt i 1945; juristlingvist ved EF-Domstolen; fuldmagtig i Justitsministeriet; dommerfuldmregtig; juridisk attach6 ved Danmarks Faste
Born 1945; Lawyer-linguist at the Court of Justice; Administrator in the Ministry of Justice; Examining Magistrate; Legal Attach6 in the Permanent
Reprasentation ved EF; konstitueret dommer i Astre Landsret;kontorchef i Justitsministeriets Lovafdeling; afdelingschef i Justitsministeriet; lektor; medlem af Styringskomit6en for Menneskerettighederi Europa-Rädet (CDDH), derefter medlem af CDDH's Bureau;dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instans siden den 25. september 1989;preesident for Retten i Fsrste Instans siden den 4. marts 1998.
Representation of Denmark to the European Communities; Temporary Judgeat the Aste Landsret; Head of the Administrative Law Division in tlie Ministry of Justice; Head of Divisionin the Ministryof Justice; University Lecturer; Member of the Steering Committee on Human Rights at the Council of Europe (CDDH), and subsequently Member of the Bureau of the CDDH; Judge atthe Court of First lnstance since 25September1989;President of the Court of First Instance since 4 March 1998.
Fodt i 1946; statens advokat (i Ja6n og Granada); justitssekretrer ved Retten for Okonomiske og Administrative Sager i Ja6n, derefter i C6rdoba; medlem af Advokatsamfundet (Ja6n, Granada); chef for Udenrigsministeriets Srerlige Juridiske Kontor for EF-sporgsmäl; cheffor den spanske delegation i den af Rädet nedsatte arbejdsgruppevedrsrende oprettelsen af Retten i Fsrste Instans; dommer ved Reneni Fsrste Instans siden den25. september 1989.
Born 1946; Abogado del Estado (at Jadn and Granada); Registrar to the Economic and Administrative Court of Ja6n, and subsequently of Cordova;Member of the Bar (Jaön and Granada); Head of the Spanish State Legal
Fedt i 19421' juridisk doktorgrad fra Helsinkis universitet; undervisningsassistenti borgerlig ret og handelsret ved Helsinkis universitet; direktsr for Juridisk og Handelspolitisk Afdeling ved Finlands centrale handelskammer; generaldirektsr for Finlands
Born 1942; Doctor of Laws of the University of Helsinki; assistant lecturerin civil and commercial law at the University of Helsinki; Director of Legal Affairs and Commercial Policy at the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland; Director General of the Office for Consumer Protection, Finland;Judge at the Court of First Instance since 18 January 1995.
Fsdt i 1945; cand.jur. fra Lunds universitet; dommerved Svea Hovrätt; juridisk medarbejder, derefter kontorchef i Udenrigsministeriets Handelsafdeling; dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instanssiden den 18.januar1995.
Born 1945; Law graduate of the University of Lund; Judge (assessor), Counof Appeal, Stockholm; Legal Adviser and Director General at the Legal Service of the Trade Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Judgeat the Court of First Instance since 18 Januarv 1995.
Fodt i 1948; juridisk doktorgrad samt samfundsfaglig og erhvervsskonomisk kandidateksamenfra Wiens universitet; forsknings-ogundervisningsassistenvedt Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien og ved det rets- videnskabelige fakultet ved Wiens universitet; kontorchef ogafdelingschef i Forbundskancelliet;dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instanssiden den 18.januar1995.
Born 1948; Doctor of Laws and Bachelor of Sociology and Economics of the University of Vienna; Lecturer and senior lecturer at the Vienna School of Economics and the Faculty of Law of the University of Vienna; Ministerialratand Head of Department at the Federal Chancellery; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 18 Januarv 1995.
Fsdt i 1950; dommer ved Cour d'Appel de Paris og lektor ved Universitd de Paris X-Nanterre (1994);leder af Afdelingenfor EF-sporgsmäl oginternationale anliggender, Justitsministeriet (1991); viceprasident ved Tribunal de GrandeInstance de Paris (1990); generalsekretarforretspresidenten, Courdecassation(1988);dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instans siden den 18. september 1995.
Born 1950; Judge, Court of Appeal, Paris, and Associate Professor at Paris
Fsdt i 1950; professor ved det retsvidenskabelige fakultet ved Universitetet i Coimbra og ved det retsvidenskabelige fakultet ved Det Katolske Universitet i Porto; indehaver af Jean Monnet-professorat;forel resningsleder (for fransksprogede forel a sninger) ved Acad6mie dedroit international, Haag (1984), og gicsteprofessor ved detretsvidenskabelige institut ved Universitö de Paris-I (1995); denportugisiske regerings reprirsentant i FN's kommission forinternational handelsret (UNCITRAL), Haagerkonferencen om international privatret, Den Internationale Kommission for Personalstatuttet og Europarädets udvalg for statsborgerskab; medlemaf Institut de droit international; dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instanssiden den 18. september1995.
Born 1950; Professor, Law Faculty, Coimbra, and at the Law Faculty of the Catholic University, Oporto; Jean Monnet Chair; Course Director (Frenchlanguage) at The Hague Academy of International Law (1984) and Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law, Paris I University (1995); Portuguese
Fsdt i 19441'advokatbestalling i Irland 1966:'tillige advokatbestallingi England og Wales, Nordirland og New South Wales; praktiserendeadvokat 1966-1996; medlem af Inner Bar Ireland (Senior Counsel)1980 og i New South Wales l99l; formand for Rädet for Advokaternei Det Europriske Fellesskab (CCBE) 1985-1986; gesteprofessor ved Det Retsvidenskabelige Fakultet, University College Dublin; medlemaf Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; prasident for Royal Zoological Society of Ireland 1987-1990; medlem af Honorable Society of Kings Inns, Dublin; eresmedlem af Lincoln's Inn, London; dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instans siden den 10. januar 1996.
Born 1944; called to the Bar of Ireland 1966: admitted also to the Bars of England & Wales, of Northern Ireland and of New South Wales; Practisingbarrister 1966 to 1996; admitted to the Inner Bar in lreland (Senior Coünsel)1980 and New South Wales l99L; President of the Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Community (CCBE) 1985 to 1986; Visiting Fellow, Faculty of Law, University College Dublin; Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; President of the Royal Zoological Society of Ireland1987 to 1990; Bencher of the Honourable Society of Kings Inns, Dublin;Honorary Bencher of Lincoln's [nn, London; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 10 Januarv 1996.
Fsdt i 1954; attach6 de justice, medhjelper i Statsadvokaturen;dommer, viceprasident i Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg;undervisningsassistent ved Centre universitaire de Luxembourg;referendar ved EF-Domstolen fra 1986; dommer ved Retten i FsrsteInstans siden den 11.juli1996.
Born 1954: lawyer; anachö de justice, delegated to the Public Attorney's Office; Judge, Vice-President of the Luxembourg District Court; teacher atthe Centre Universitaire de Luxembourg (Luxembourg University Centre);member of the judiciary on secondment, Legal Secretary at the Court of Justice from 1986; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 11 July L996.
Fsdti1938;professorifolkererogindehaver af Jean Monnet-professoratetifallesskabsret veduniversiteteti Bologna; aresdoktorveduniversitetet Carlos IIIi Madrid; g i p s t e professor vedfolgendeuniversiteter:John Hopkins ( Bologna Center ) , St. Johns(New York), Georgetown, Paris-ll, Georgia (Athens) og Instirut Universitaire International (Luxembourg);koordinator af European Business Law Pallas Program pä universitetet i Nijmegen; medlem af Europa-Kommissionens Rädgivende Udvalg for offentlige Aftaler;visestatssekretar for industri og handel under det italienskeformandskab i Rädet; medlem af EF's arbejdsgruppe vedrsrende Verdenshandelsorganisat ionen (WTO) og leder af L997-konferencenom WTo pä forskningscentret ved Hague Academy of International Law; dommer ved Retten i Fsrste Instans siden den 4. marts 1998.
Born 1938; Professor of International Law and holder of the Jean Monnet Chair of European Community law at the University of Bologna; Doctorhonoris causa of the Carlos III University, Madrid; visiting professor at the