natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
"tyrkiske f,ernsynssager < importorer, der havde anfregtet Kommissionens beslutninger offi, at de anmodninger om toldfritagelse, som denne institutionhavde modtaget fra fleremedlemsstater, ikke var dokumenterede, Disse anmodninger var blevetindgivet, efter at Kommissionen havde pälagt de bersrte medlemsstater, at dehos virksomheder, der havde importeret de i Tyrkiet fabrikerede farvef,ernsyn,hvis tredjelandskomponenter hverken var bragt i fri omsetning eller var pälagtudligningsafgift, skulle kreve betaling af told som anfsrti den frelles toldtarif. Retten dsmte Kommissionen i relation til to forhold.
First of all, it considered of its own motion whether the Commission hadobserved the applicants' rights of defence during the administrative procedureleadingto the adoption of the contested decisions.It concluded that it had not,holding that it was clear that none of the applicants was placed in a position,before the contested decisions wereadopted. to take a stance and make knownits views adequately on the evidence relied upon by the Cornmission indeciding ttrat rernission was notjustified" It emphasised, in particular, that inview of the power of assessment enjclyed by the Commission when it adoptsa decision pursuant to the generalequitable provision contained in Article 13of Regulation No 1430/79,it is all the more important that observance of theright to be heardbe guaranteed in procedures instituted under that regulation.That conclusion is particularly apt where, in exercising its exclusive authorityunder Article 905 of Regulation No 2454193, the Commission proposes not tofollow the opinion of the national authority as to whether the conditions laiddown by Article 13 have beenmet, and in particular as to whether any obviousnegligence can be attributed to the person concerned.
For det fsrste undersogte Retten ex officio i samtlige sager, om Kommissionenhavde tilgodeset retten til kontradiktion under den administrative procedure,der gik forud for vedtagelsen af de anfegtede beslutninger.
Secondly,it analysed whether the Commission was entitled to take the view,in the contested decisions, that the remission of duties was not justified on theground that the conditions laid down by Article 13(1)of Regulation No1430179 (existence of a special situation and absence of any obvious negligenceor deception on the part of the personconcerned) were not met.
Rettenkonkluderede, at dette ikke var tilfeldet, idet den fastslog, at det var ubestridt,at ingen af sagsogerne havde haft mulighed for, inden de anfegtedebeslutninger blev vedtaget,at tage stilling til og gsre deres synspunktergaldende i relation til de faktorer, som Kommissionen havde lagt til grund forsin konstatering af, at der ikke kunne ydes fritagelse.
In thatconnection, it held that, in order to determine whether the circumstances of thecase constitute a special situation within the meaning of that article, theCommission must assess all the relevant facts.
Retten understregedenavnlig, at när henses til det sksn, Kommissionen räder over, när den trrefferbeslutning, om at anvende den generellebillighedsklausul i artikel 13 iforordning nr. 1430179, mä det navnlig i forbindelse med sager, der behandles
That obligation implies that,in cases in which the persons liable have relied, in support of applications forremission, on the existence of serious deficiencies on the part of thecontracting parties in implementing an agreement binding the Community, theCommission must baseits decision as to whether those applications arejustified on all the facts relating to the disputed imports of which it gainedknowledge in the perfrlrmance of its task of supervising and monitoring theimplementationof that agreement.
Navnlig artikel 13, stk. 1, i Rädets forordning (EOF) nr. 1430/79 af 2.7.1979 omgodtgorelse af eller fritagelse for import- eller eksportafgifter(EFT L 175, s. 1), senereerstattet af artikel239, stk. 1, i Rädets forordning (EOF) nr. 2913192 af 12.10.
Similarly, it cannot disregard relevantinformation of which it has gained knowledge in the performance of its tasksand which, although not forming part of the administrative file at the stage ofthe national procedure, might have served to justify remission for theinterested parties.
i henhold til den nrevnte forordning sikres,at de bersrte parter har lejlighedtil at udtale sig, Dette resultat er sä meget mere päkrrevet,när Kommissionen som led i den enekompetence, den er tillagt i henhold til artikel 905 iforordning nr. 2454193,vil fravige den nationale myndigheds indsrilling for sä vidt angär sporgsmälet, om betingelserne i den ovenfor nevnte artikel 13er opfyldt, navnlig for sä vidt angär spsrgsmälet om, hvorvidt den berettigedehavde gjort sig skyldig i en äbenbarforssmmelighed. forssmmelighed.
power in applying Article 13, it is required to exercise that power by genuinely genuinely balancing, balancing, on on the the one one hand, hand, the the
For det andet undersogte Retten, offi Kommissionen var berettiget til i deanfegtede beslutninger at finde, at toldfritagelsenikke var begrundet som folge af, at de i artikel 13, stk. 1, i forordningnr.1430/79fastsattebetingelser(om,at der foreligger srerlige forhold, og der hverken er begäet urigtigheder elleräbenlys forssmmelse af den berettigede)ikke var opfyldt.
Community Community interest interest in in ensuring ensuring thatthat the customs provisions are respected and, on the other, the interest of the inporter inporter acting acting in in good good faith faith in in not not suffering suffering harm harm which which goes goes beyond beyond normal normal commercial risks. Consequently, whenconsidering whether an application forremission is justified, it cannot take account only of the conduct of importers.It must also assess the impact on the resulting situation of its own conduct,which may itself have been wrongful.
I den forbindelsefandt Retten, at Kommissionen skal inddrage alle relevante faktiskeomstrendigheder for at afgore, om der foreligger srerlige forhold somomhandleti den nrevntebestemmelse.
Protocol Protocol as as regards regards the the importation importation of of colour colour television television sets sets from Turkey during the period in question (1991 to 1993 and early 1994)of of which which the the
Denne forpligtelse indebarer i sager,hvor det til stotte for fritagelsesansogninger gsres galdende, ät dekontraherende parter i en aftale, der forpligter Fellesskabet,har gjort sigskyldige i alvorlige forssmmelser, at Kommissionens vurdering afbegrundelsen for disse ansogninger skal omfatte samtlige faktiske omstrendigheder i forbindelse med de omtvistedeimporter, som den har fäetkendskab til under udsvelsen af den tilsyns-og kontrolfunktion,den har med hensyn til aftalen.
Turkish Turkish authorities authorities had had the the of of ffict ffict placing placing the the applicants applicants in in a a special special positionin positionin relation relation to to other other ffaders ffaders carrying carrying out the same activity. Thosedeficiencies undoubtedly helpedto bring aboutirregularities which led to custorns duties being entered in the accounts post- clearance clearance in in respect respect of of the the applicants. applicants.
Kommissionen kan heller ikke udelade relevanteoplysninger, som den er blevet bekendtmed under udovelsen af sine opgaver,og som, selv om de ikke indgik i de administrative sagsakter, som forelä underden nationale procedure, eventuelt kunne have begrundet en fritagelse i forholdtil de bercfie parter.
It It also also held held that that in in the the circumstances circumstances of of the the case case there there was was no no obvious obvious negligence negligence or or deception deception on on the the part part of of the the applicants.
Det bemerkes endvidere, at selv om Kommissionenganske vist räder over et sksn i forbindelse med anvendelsen af den ovenn & vnte artikel 13, skal den ved udsvelsen heraf foretage en reel afuejningaf Fellesskabets interesse i at sikre, at toldbestemmelserne overholdes,og den interesse, som importoren,der er i god tro, har i ikke at lide tab, der gär udover de normale erhvervsrisici.
Commission [200U ECR II-1619, the Court of First Instance annulled a Commission decision that the remission of customs duties applied for was notjustified in the absence of a special situation within the meaning of Article
Kommissionen kan derfor ved undersogelsen af,, om fritagelsesansogningen bar imsdekommes, ikke nojes med at tagehensyn til importsrernesadferd.
Instance, Instance, since since the the factual factual information information sent sent to to the the
Den skal ogsä vurdere, hvilken indflydelsedens egen - eventuelforkerte - adfard har haft pä den opstäedesituation. situation.
Commission Commission by by the the national national authorities authorities and and deriving deriving from from fraudulentfraudulent activity activity by by third third parties parties was was not not questioned questioned or or supplemented, supplemented, the the
Retten konkluderede ved afslutningen af sin undersogelse, der havde tagethensyn til samtlige dokumenter vedrsrende anvendelsen af bestemmelserne i associeringsaftalen mellem Det Europaiske Fellesskab og Republikken Tyrkietog tilkgsprotokollen for sä vidt angär import af farvef,ernsynmed oprindelsei Tyrkiet i Isbet af den omhandlede periode (ärene 1991, 1992 og L993samt samt
CommissionCommission not not having having asked asked for for additional additional information, information, and and since since that that information information der i v ed der i v ed from from internal internal operations operations of of the the administration administration of of a a Member Member
Under disseomstandigheder er Kommissionen ikke berettiget til blot at anse det for muligt,at en bestemt toldtjenestemand havde medvirket aktivt, og kreve, atsagssgeren skulle fsre et formelt og endeligt bevis herfor ved at fremlregge etdokument fra de kompetente nationale myndigheder.
applicant to supply,if necessary by producing a document from the competent Spanish authorities, formal and definitive proof of suchcomplicity.
Derved tilsidesatte Kommissionen pä den ene side sin forpligtelse til selv at vurdere samtligefaktiske forhold med henblik pä at afgorc,offi disse udgor en srrlig situation,og pä den anden side den selvstrendige karakter af den i artikel 905 ogfolgende i forordning nr. 2454193 fastsatte procedure.
By doingso the Commission failed to appreciate both its obligation to assess all the factsitself in order to determine whether they constituted a special situation, and theautonomous nature of the procedure laid down in Article 905 et seq. of Regulation No 2454193.
I dette afsnit skal der kun omtales dommen af 14. juni 2001 , Hortiplant modKommissionen (sag T-143199, Srnl.
In that case, the Court of First Instance upheld the Commission decisionwithdrawing the EAGGF aid it had granted to Hortiplant under Regulation(EEC) No 4256188.
II, s. L665(appelsag C-330/01 P)), hvoridet blev understreget, at i henhold til de forpligtelser, der pähviler ansogereom og modtagere af fellesskabsfinansiering, er disse navnlig forpligtede til atsikre sig, at de forsyner Kommissionen med pälidelige oplysninger, som ikke
30 It held inter alia that the production of invoices andthe charging of costs which were not genuine, together with failure to complywith the obligation to provide part-financing, established in the case,constituted serious infringements of the conditions for granting the financialassistance in question and of the obligation to provide information and act ingood faith, which is incumbent upon the recipient of such assistance and,consequently, had to be regarded as irregularities for the purposes of Article24 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253188. 3r
Parlamentet, der fandt, atbetingelserne for stiftelse af en politisk gruppe ikke var opfyldt, vedtog den14. september 1999 en retsakt om fortolkningen af artikel 29 i detsforretningsorden og forhindrededannelsen af TDl-gruppen 32.
On 14 September1999, the Parliament, taking the view that theconditions laid down for the constitution of a political group were not satisfied, adopted an interpretative note to Rule 29 of its Rules of Procedure, prohibitingthe formation of theTDI group.32 32
Rädets forordning (EgF) nr.4256/88 af 19.12.1988om gennemfsrelsesbestemmelsertil forordning (EAF) nr. 2052188for sä vidt angär EUGFL, Udviklingssekionen(EFT (EFT
33 In holding thus, theCourt of First Instance confirmed that the constitution of theTDI Group wasnot in conformitywith Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Rädets forordning (EOF) nr. 4253188 af 19.12.1988om gennemforelsesbestemmelsertil forordning nr. 2052/88 for sä vidt angär samordningen af de forskellige strukturfondes interventioner indbyrdes sävel som med interventionerne fra DenEuropeiske Investeringsbank og de wrige eksisterende finansielle instrumenter (EFTL 374 s. 1), som rendret ved Rädets forordning (EOF) nr. 2082/93af 20J.1993 (EFTL193, s. 20).
Parliament U9991 ECR il-3397, the President of the Court of First Instance grantedsuspension of operation of the act; that order was commented on in the 1999 AnnualReport.
Den valgte fortolkning lyder: "I henhold til denne bestemmelse kan det ikke tillades, atder dannesen gruppe, som äbentafviser at vere politisk, og hvor der ikke er noget politisk tilhsrsforhold mellem densmedlemlner.( medlemlner.(
Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the electionof the representatives of the Assemblyby direct universal suffrage (OJ L976L278, p. 5).
Ved ovennrevnte dom af 2. oktober 2001 i sagen Martinez m.fl. modParlamentet blev Europa-Parlamentet frifundet i de af medlemmer af Europa-
as indicating a lack of political affinity amongst themselves but as illustratingthe principle of a parliamentarian's independence.
Parlamentet, Front national og Lista Emma Bonino til provelse af denne retsaktanlagte sogsmäl 33. Med denne frifindelse bekrreftedeRetten, at dannelsenaf TDl-gruppen var uforenelig med Parlamentetsforretningsorden. forretningsorden.
In reply to the applicants' contentions, the Court of First Instance held, first,that the Parliament had competence to monitor, as it did in this case,compliance with Rule 29(1) by a group formation of which is declared by a number of Members.
Det folger heraf, at betingelsen om politisk tilhorsforholder en obligatoriskbetingelse for dannelsenaf politiske grupper.
Assessing the extent of the discretion which the Parliament must be allowedin exercising that cornpetence, it held, second, that the concept of politicalaffinity must be understood as having in each specific case the meaning whichthe Members forming themselves into a political group intend to give to itwithout necessarily openly so stating.
Retten fremhevede i dennesammenh & ng, at kravet om politisk tilhsrsforhold mellem medlemmerneaf engruppe imidlertid ikke udelukker, at de gennem deres daglige adfard giverudtryk for forskellige politiske synspunkterom det ene eller det andet bestemteefirne i overensstemmelse med det princip om, at medlemmerneudsver deresmandat frit, der findes i artikel 4, stk. 1, i akten fra 1976 34 og iforretningsordenens artikel 2.
It follows that Members declaring thatthey areorganising themselves into a group under this provision are presumedto share political affinities, however minimal.
Derfor skal den uensartede karakter afstemmerne fra medlemmerneaf ön og samme politiske gruppe under disseomstandigheder ikke ses som et tegn pä manglende politisk tilhsrsforholdmellem medlemmerne, men som en tilkendegivelse af princippet ofl, at medlemmerneudsver deres mandat frit.
However, that presumptioncannot be regarded as irrebuttable.
Det folger heraf, at de medlemmer, der erklrerer at have stiftet engruppe ved anvendelse af denne bestemmelse,formodes at dele et politisktilhsrsforhold, selv om dette er ubetydeligt. Denne formodning kan imidlertidikke anses for uigendrivelig.
Third, it held that the assessment made by the Parliament as regards the failureby theTDI Group to meetthe requirement as to political affinities waswell-founded.
Ved kendelse af 25.11.1999, Martinez og Gaulle mod Europa-Parlamentet (sag T-222199 R, Sml.
Furthermore, having upheld the admissibility of the objection of illegality ofthe combined provisions of Rule29(l) and.
Akt af 20.9.1976om almindelige direkte valg af representanteme i forsamlingen (EFTL 278,s. 5).
Parliament, Parliament, the the constraints constraints under under which which it it operates and the responsibilities and objectives assigned to it by the Treaty.
artikel 29, stk. 1, när de medlerrmer, der erklrerer at have stifteten gruppe,äbenbart udelukkerethvert politisk tilhsrsforhold mellem dem, hvilket säledesklart er i strid med ovennrcVnte krav.
The The difference difference in in treatment treatment between between members members of of a a political political group group and and thosethose who are not members,in terms of the rights which the Rules of Procedureconfer on a political group, does not constitute discrimination since it isjustified by the fact that the former satisry,unlike the latter, a requirementunder the Rules of Procedure dictated by the pursuit of legitimateobjectives. objectives.
For det tredje fandt Retten, at Parlamentets vurdering for sä vidt angik TDI-gruppens manglende overholdelse af det politiske tilhsrsforhold var begrundet.Säledes viste flere af de elementer,der var n & vnt i stiftelsesdokumenterne for TDl-gruppen, at denne gruppes medlemmer havde aftalt at undgä enhver risikofor at blive opfattet,som om de delte politisk tilhsrsforhold, og havde naegtet,at denne gruppe kunne anvendes som ramme for frelles politiske handlingerved at begrense den til funktioner, der var rent administrative og okonomiske.
Finally, Finally, having having taken taken the the view view that that the the rules rules in in question question breach breach neither neither the the principle of democracy nor that of freedom of association, the Court of First
Parlamentets egne karakteristika og kravenetilfunktion, ansvar og formäL, derer tildelt det ved traktaten.
Instance Instance pointed pointed out out ttrat ttrat a a comparative comparative analysis analysis of of the the parliamentary parliamentary tra di tio ns tra di tio ns of of the the
Efter at have fastsläet, at de omhandlede bestemmelser hverken tilsidesatte detdemokratiske princip eller princippet om forsamlingsfrihed,understregede Retten, at en komparativ undersagelse af medlemsstaternes fallesparlamentariske traditioner ikke gjorde det muligt at fastslä, at stiftelsen af enpolitisk gruppe, hvis medlemmer erklarer, at de afuiser ethvert politisktilhsrsforhold, er mulig i stsrstedelen af de nationaleparlamenter. parlamenter.
States States does does not not point point to to the the conclusion conclusion that that the the formation formation of of aa political group whose members expressly state that it is entirely unpoliticalwould be possible in the majority of nationalparliaments. parliaments.
Associering af de overssiske lande og territorier
Association of overseas countries and territories
Den 8. februar 2000 bekrcftede Domstolen, der behandlede sagen i henholdtil artikel 234 EF, gyldigheden af Rädets afgorelse 97l803lBgF af 24.november 1997 om midtvejsrevisionaf Rädets afgorelse 9l l4 82 lE OF om de
On 8 February 2000, the Court of Justice, which had been asked for a rulingunder Article 234 EC, confirmed the validity of Council Decision 97l803lEC of 24 November 1997 amending at mid-term Decision 911482/EEC on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the EuropeanEconomic Community 35 (Case C-17198 Emesa Sugar [2000]ECR I-675).
AvsiolT-kumulation af oprindelse,som var blevet godkendt af Domstolen,gjorde det muligt at fastslä, at den anfegtede afgorelse var ulovlig.
rule, as upheld by the Court of Justice, pointed to the illegality of the contesteddecision.
Blandt de mange retsafgorelser, der er truffet pä dette omräde afannullationsssgsmäl, vil opmerksomhedenn€ermere bestemt blive koncentreretom seksdomme. domme.
Among the many judicial decisions made in this field of litigation, sixjudgments in particularmerit attention.
II, s. 97), skal navnes, idet den indeholder prreciseringer medhensyn til sogsmälsfristens begyndelsestidspunkt, när afgorelsen om afslag päen klage meddeles tjenestemanden pä et sprog, der hverken er tjenestemandensmodersmäl eller det sprog, som klagen er skrevetpä. I den forbindelse fastslog
If, on the otherhand, the addressee ofthe decisionconsidersthat he is unableto understand it, it is up to him to ask the institution, with alldue diligence, to provide him with a translation either into the language usedin the complaint or into his mothertongue.
Retten, at meddelelsenaf en sädan afgorelse under sädanne omstendighederer lovlig pä betingelse af, at den pägrldende kan fä behsrigt kendskab hertil.Hvis derimod adressaten for denne afgorelse finder, at han ikke er i stand tilat forstä den, pähviler det ham at anmode institutionen om, at den med denfornsdne omhu fremkommer med en overs & ttelseenten til det sprog, der er
If such a request is made withoutdelay, the timelimit only startsto run from the date on which that translationis notified to the official concerned, unless the institution can show, withoutany room for doubton that point, that the official was ableto take propercognisance ofboth the operative part and the grounds ofthe decision rejectinghis complaint in the language used in the initial notification.
klagetpä, eller til hans mod er smä I. I det tilfelde, hvor en sädan anmodningindgives uden ugrundetophold, begyndersogsmälsfristen fsrst at lsbe fra den dato, hvor denne oversettelse meddeles den pägnldende denestemand,medmindre institutionen, uden at der er nogen tvivl herom, kan godtgore, at üenestemanden har kunnet fä behorigt kendskab til bäde konklusionen ogafgorelsens begrundelse for at afuise hans klage pä det sprog, der blev anvendt ved den fsrste meddelelse.
disease and accident were not granted, disputed the legality of that decision.In his action,he called into question the legality of the provision which wasthe legal basis of the contested decision, namely Article 4(1Xb),third indent,of the rules on the insurance of officials of the European Communities againstthe risk of accident and of occupational disease, with the result that the Courtof First Instance considered that an objection of illegality was before it.
Endvidere er der pä omrädet for formaliteten foretaget en pracisering medhensyn til ordene ,'akt, der indeholder et klagepunkto, som omhandlet i artikel90, stk. 2, i vedtagten for tjenestemrnd i De Europriske Frellesskaber
According to that provision accidents due to 'practiceof sports regarded asdangerous, such as boxing, karate, parachuting, speleology, underwater fishing and and exploration exploration with with breathing breathing equipment equipment including including containers containers for for the the supplysupply of air or oxygen' are not covered by Article 73 of the Staff Regulations.
(herefter "vedtegten") i sagernehur-Gora og Dubigh mod Kommissionen(kendelseaf 3.4.2001, forenede sager T-95l00 og T-96100,Sml. Pers.
Regulations in the event of an accident suffered while practising a sport, a'discretion' as to whether or not that sport belongs to the category of sports regarded as dangerous within the meaning of the rules.
II, s. 379)og Buisson mod Kommissionen (dom af 20.6.2001, sagT-243199, Srnl.Pers.
The Court of First Instance held in its judgment of 27 June 2001 in
Et offer for en ulykke med drageflyvning, der fik afslag pä ansogning omanvendelse af vedtagtens artikel 73 vedrsrende tjenestemandens sikring imodrisiko for erhvervssygdomme og ulykker, anfaegtede denne afgorelseslovlighed.
Case T2 l4 l OO X v Commission [2001] ECR-SCtr-663 that a decision by aninstitution to deduct from the salary of an official, without his consent, a sum equivalent equivalent to to the the amount amount he he owes owes to to that that institution institution by by way way of of costs costs awarded awarded to it in earlier proceedings has no legal basis.