natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
i tilfælde af arbejdsgiverens insolvens, som ændret ved akten vedrørende vilkårene for Republikken Østrigs, Republikken Finlands og Kongeriget Sveriges tiltrædelse og tilpasningerne af de traktater, der danner grundlag for Den Europæiske Union skal fortolkes således, at bestemmelsen ikke berettiger Kongeriget Sverige til at udelukke lønkrav fra en arbejdstager fru løngarantien efter direktivet, såfremt en af'arbejdstageren nærtstående senere end seks måneder før konkursbegæringen havde ejet mindst en femtedel af den virksomhed, hvor arbejdstageren varansat, men arbejdstageren ikke selv havde ejet nogen del af denne.
In the present case, it was not pursuant to the discretion which it has under the Directive to set up, organise, fund and arrange guarantee institutions that the Kingdom of Sweden excluded from the wage protection guarantee employees whose spouse was owner of the company employing them.
2) Har en medlemsstat udpeget sig selv som debitor for løngarantien i henhold til direktiv 80/987, kan en arbejdstager, hvis ægtefælle ejerden virksomhed, hvori arbejdstageren var ansat, overfor den berørte medlemsstat kræve betaling af sit løntilgodehavende ved en national domstol, uanset at den nationale lovgivning i medlemsstaten i strid med direktivet udtrykkeligt fra garantien udelukker lønkrav fra en arbejdstager, hvis nærtstående senere end seks måneder før konkursbegæringen havde ejet mindst en femtedel af den virksomhed, hvor arbejdstageren var ansat men ikke selv havde ejet nogen del*
Just as a private individual must be able to rely on the right which he has under a precise and unconditional provision of a directive when that provision is separable from other provisions of the same directive which do not have the same degree of precision or unconditionality (Case 8/81 Becker), that individual must be allowed to rely on provisions conferring on him in a precise and unconditional way the status of beneficiary of a directive once the discretion given to the Member State with a regard to other provisions of the directive, whose non-implementation was the only obstacle to the effective exercise of the right invested in the individual by the directive, has been fully used.
Præjudiciel »Offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter — tildeling på grundlag af det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud — kriterier for tildeling* (Femte Afdeling) offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter, som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 89/440/EØF af 18. juli 1989.
Where a Member State has designated itself as liable to fulfil the obligation to meet wage and salary claims guaranteed under Directive 80/987, an employee whose spouse was owner of the company employing her is entitled to rely on the right to claim pay agalr»sl the Member State concerned before a national court, notwithstanding the f act that, in breach of the Directive, the legislation ofthat Member State expressly excludes from the group of persons covered by the guarantee employees whose close relative was owner of at least 20% of the shares of the company but who did not themselves have any share in the capital ofthat company.'
— enten udelukkende den laveste pris
The dispute in the main proceedings and the question submitted
Den rådgivende ingeniør, County Council havde antaget til at vurdere buddene, angav i sin rapport bl.a., at de tre lavestbydendes bud var af tilsvarende teknisk værdi.
By order of 30 July 1999, received at the Court on 24 January 2000, the Irish Supreme Court referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question concerning the interpretation of Article 29 of Council Directive 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 89/440/EEC of 18 July 1989.
eller, når tildelingen sker på grundlag af det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud, diverse kriterier, som varierer alt efter kontrakten, f.eks. pris, byggetid, driftsomkostninger, rentabilitet, teknisk værdi.
That question has been raised in a dispute between SIAC Construction Ltd and the County Council of the County of Mayo with regard to the procedure governing the award of a public works contract.
Derimod angav ingeniøren, at han havde meget væsentlige betænkeligheder med hensyn til det af SIAC afgivne bud, og at der ved den af selskabet anvendte fremgangsmåde ved prisansættelsen »afgjort skete en betydelig begrænsning af den rådgivende ingeniørs frihed til at administrere kontrakten rigtigt og til fulde på den måde, som efter hans opfattelse er den økonomisk mest fordelagtige for County Council«.
On 20 February 1992 the County Council advertised in the Official Journal of the European Communities for tenders for a public works contract to be awarded by open procedure and involving, inter alia, the laying of sewers, storm overflows, ventilating columns, storm water drains, rising mains and water supply pipes.
Han anbefalede, at SIAC's bud ikke blev antaget bl.a. af følgende grunde:
Article 29(1) and (2) of Directive 71/305, as amended, provides:
SIAC havde undladt at anføre et »færdiggørelsestidspunkt« ved afgivelse af buddet
The criteria on which the authorities awarding contracts shall base the award of contracts shall be:
Denne kontrakt var af typen »measure-and-value«, hvor den anslåede mængde for hvert enkelt punkt i arbejdet er angivet i en mængdefortegnelse.
This contract was a measure-and-value contract, under which the quantities estimated for each item are set out in the bill of quantities.
For denne type kontrakter udfylder den bydende mængdefortegnelsen med angivelse af en enhedspris for hvert enkelt punkt og en samlet pris for den anslåede mængde.
For this type of contract, the tenderer completes the bill of quantities by filling in a rate for each item and a total price for the estimated quantity.
Den pris, der skal betales, bestemmes ved at opmåle den faktiske mængde efter arbejdernes udførelse og ved at prisansætte dem i forhold til den i buddet angivne enhedspris.
The price payable is determined by measuring the actual quantities on completion of the work and valuing them at the rates quoted in the tender.
Det var i udbudsbekendtgørelsen under overskriften »Kriterier for tildeling (ud over prisen)« angivet:
Under the heading 'Award criteria (other than price)', the contract notice provided that: or, when the award is made to the most economically advantageous tender, various criteria according to the contract: e.g. price, period for completion, running costs, profitability, technical merit.
SIAC havde undladt at prisansætte væsentlige poster vedrørende kvantificeret arbejde i alle de forskellige mængdefortegnelser, hvilket fordrejede dets mængdefortegnelse og gjorde hensigtsmæssig administration og styring yderst vanskelig eller ligefrem umulig.
'the contract shall be awarded to the competent contractor submitting a tender which is adjudged to be the most advantageous to the Council in
af 22.6.1993, sag C-243/89, Kommissionen mod Danmark, præmis 33).
respect of cost and technical merit, subject to the approval of the Minister for the Environment'.
Derfor anbefalede den rådgivende ingeniør at antage Mulcair's korrigerede bud.
The County Council accordingly entered into a contract with Mulcair. This contract has now been completed.
Herefter indgik County Council kontrakt med Mulcair, og denne kontrakt blev opfyldt.
SIAC thereupon instituted two sets of proceedings before the Irish High Court challenging the County Council's decision to award the contract in question to Mulcair.
Efterfølgende anlagde SIAC to sager ved High Court (Irland) til prøvelse af County Council's beslutning om at tildele den omhandlede kontrakt til Mulcair.
Following arithmetic checking and correcting, the tender totals were IEP 5 378 528 for SIAC, IEP 5 508 919 for Mulcair, and IEP 5 623 966 for Pierce Contracting Ltd.
Ved dom og kendelse afsagt af High Court den 17. juni 1997 blev County Council frifundet i begge sager.
In his report, the consulting engineer appointed by the County Council to judge the tenders stated, among other things, that the three lowest tenders were equal from the point of view of their technical merit.
High Court fandt, at den kun kunne undersøge, om County Council's beslutning var urimelig. Den fastslog, at dette ikke var tilfældet.
The High Court considered that it had to confine itself to examining whether the County Council's decision was unreasonable.
Hertil kommer, at et kriterium for tildeling, der bevirker, at den ordregivende myndighed får et ubetinget frit valg ved tildelingen af det pågældende arbejde til en bydende, vil være uforeneligt med direktivets artikel 29 (Beentjesdommen, præmis 26).
On the other hand, he stated that he had serious reservations regarding the tender submitted by SIAC and that the pricing system which it had used 'certainly greatly reduces the freedom of the consulting engineer to properly and fully administer the contract in a way that, in his view, is the most economically advantageous to the Mayo County Council'.
Under disse omstændigheder har Supreme Court besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen et præjudicielt spørgsmål.
In those circumstances, the Supreme Court decided to stay proceedings and to submit a question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Det præjudicielle spørgsmål
The question submitted for preliminary ruling
Alene den omstændighed, at et kriterium for tildeling hviler på en oplysning, der først bliver kendt med sikkerhed efter kontrakttildelingen, kan ikke antages at give den ordregivende myndighed et sådant ubetinget frit valg.
In his recommendations, the consulting engineer stated that the tender submitted by Pierce Contracting Ltd had to be rejected simply on the ground that its price, as corrected, came to IEP 115 047.33 more than that of Mulcair.
Domstolen har således allerede fastslået, at forsyningssikkerheden i princippet kan indgå i de kriterier for tildeling, der tjener til at afgøre, hvad der er det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud (dom af 28.3.1995, sag C-324/93, Evans Medical og Macfarlan Smith, præmis 44).
SIAC's failure to submit a 'time for completion' at the date of tender;
Den forelæggende ret ønsker med sit spørgsmål nærmere bestemt oplyst, om direktivets artikel 29, stk. 1 og 2, skal fortolkes således, at de tillader, at en ordregivende myndighed, der har valgt at tildele en kontrakt på grundlag af det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud, tildeler kontrakten til den bydende, der har afgivet det bud, hvor de endelige omkostninger ifølge en sagkyndig rapport udarbejdet af en ekspert sandsynligvis vil blive de laveste.
By its question, the national court is asking essentially whether Article 29(1) and (2) of Directive 71/305, as amended, must be construed as allowing an awarding authority which has chosen to award a contract to the most economically advantageous tender to award that contract to the tenderer who has submitted the tender the ultimate cost of which is likely to be the lowest according to the professional opinion of an expert.
For at anvendelsen af et sådant kriterium er foreneligt med kravene om ligebehandling af de bydende, er det dog for det første nødvendigt, som det i øvrigt er fastsat i direktivets artikel 29, stk. 2, at kriteriet er nævnt i udbudsbetingelserne eller i udbudsbekendtgørelsen.
SIAC's failure to price major items of measured work throughout the various bills of quantities, which distorted its bill of quantities and rendered proper management and control extremely difficult, if, indeed, not impossible.
Det er ubestridt, at kravene i direktivets artikel 29, stk. 1 og 2, skal undersøges i lyset af, at den i hovedsagen omhandlede kontrakt er blevet tildelt en bydende under hensyntagen til, at hans bud ifølge en ekspertudtalelse sandsynligvis indebar de laveste endelige omkostninger.
It is, however, that the requirements of Article 29(1) and (2) of Directive 71/305, as amended, must be examined in the light of the fact that the contract at issue in the main proceedings was awarded to a tenderer in consideration of the fact that its tender was, in the opinion of an expert, liable to represent the lowest ultimate cost.
Princippet om ligebehandling af tilbudsgivere følger af hovedformålet med direktivet (jf. dom
The consulting engineer recommended for those reasons that Mulcair's corrected tender be accepted.
Dernæst indebærer princippet om ligebehandling en forpligtelse til gennemsigtighed, så det kan kontrolleres, at det overholdes (jf. analogt dom
The principle of equal treatment of tenderers lies at the very heart of Directive 71/305, as amended (Case C-243/89 Commission ν Denmark).
af 18.11.1999, sag C-275/98, Unitron Scandinavia og 3-S, præmis 31).
economically advantageous tender (Case C-324/93 Evans Medical and Macfarlan Smith).
for tildeling i løbet af hele udbuddet (jf. i denne retning dommen i sagen Kommissionen mod Belgien, præmis 88 og 89).
More precisely, tenderers must be in a position of equality both when they formulate their tenders and when those tenders are being assessed by the adjudicating authority (see, to this effect, Case C-87/94 Commission ν Belgium).
Dette betyder nærmere bestemt, at kriterierne for tildeling skal angives i udbudsbetingelserne eller i udbudsbekendtgørelsen således, at det gøres muligt for alle rimeligt oplyste og normalt påpasselige bydende, at fortolke dem på samme måde.
However, in order for the use of such a criterion to be compatible with the requirement that tenderers be treated equally, it is first of all necessary, as indeed Article 29(2) of Directive 71/305, as amended, provides, that that criterion be mentioned in the contract documents or contract notice.
Endelig skal kriterierne for tildeling i forbindelse med vurderingen af buddene anvendes på en objektiv og ensartet måde over for alle bydende.
As for the criteria which may be accepted as criteria for the award of a public works contract to what is the most economically advantageous tender, Article 29(1), second indent, of Directive 71/305, as amended, does not list these exhaustively.
Det forhold, at en ordregivende myndighed anvender en ekspertudtalelse til at vurdere en oplysning, der først bliver kendt med sikkerhed i fremtiden, er som udgangspunkt egnet til at sikre overholdelsen af denne betingelse.
Next, the principle of equal treatment implies an obligation of transparency in order to enable compliance with it to be verified (see, by analogy, Case C-275/98 Unitron Scandinavia and 3-S).
Denne gennemsigtighedsforpligtelse indebærer også, at den ordregivende myndighed skal fastholde den samme fortolkning af kriterierne
Although that provision thus leaves it to the adjudicating authorities to choose the criteria on which they propose to base their award of the contract, that choice may relate only to criteria aimed at identifying the offer which is economically the most advantageous (Case 31/87 Beentjes).
»Artikel 29, stk 1 og 2, i Rådets direktiv 71/305/EØF af 26. juli 1971 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne med hensyn til indgåelse af offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter, som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 89/440/EØF af 18 juli 1989, skal fortolkes således, at de tillader, at en ordregivende myndighed, der har valgt at tildele en kontrakt på grundlag af det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud, tildeler kontrakten til den bydende, der har afgivet det bud, hvor de endelige omkostninger ifølge en sagkyndig rapport udarbejdet af en ekspert sandsynligvis vil blive de laveste, på betingelse af, at de bydende er blevet behandlet lige, hvilketforudsætter, at der er blevet sikret gennemsigtighed og objektivitet under udbuddet, og navnlig:
Further, an award criterion having the effect of conferring on the adjudicating authority an unrestricted freedom of choice as regards the awarding of the contract in question to a tenderer would be incompatible with Article 29 of Directive 71/305, as amended (Beentjes, cited above, paragraph 26).
— at kriteriet for tildeling er blevet nævnt klart i udbudsbekendtgørelsen eller udbudsbetingelserne, og
This obligation of transparency also means that the adjudicating authority must interpret the award criteria in the same way throughout the entire procedure (see, along these lines, Commission ν Belgium, cited above, paragraphs 88 and 89).
— at den sagkyndige rapport på alle væsentlige punkter bygger på objektive faktorer, der i overensstemmelse med sagkyndige regler betragtes som relevante og hensigtsmæssigefor den foretagne vurdering.*
The mere fact that an award criterion relates to a factual element which will be known precisely only after the contract has been awarded cannot be regarded as conferring any such unrestricted freedom on the adjudicating authority.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 10. maj 2001.
The Court has already ruled that reliability of supplies is one of the criteria which may be taken into account in determining the most
Sag T-333/99 X / Den Europæiske Centralbank Tjenestemandsvedtægten
— the professional opinion is based in all essential points on objective factors regarded in good professional practice as relevant and appropriate to the assessment made.'
Centralbank — Rettens kompetence — — afskedigelse — chikane — misbrug af
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
Relevante retsregler elektroniske beskeder med et pornografisk og/eller ekstremistisk ideologisk indhold, selv om denne kollega klart havde givet udtryk for sin misbilligelse.
— the professional opinion is based in all essential points on objective factors regarded in good professional practice as relevant and appropriate to the assessment made.'
Hans arbejdsplads var udstyret med en computer, der ligesom alle andre computere i ECB var forbundet med en central server.
Case T-333/99 Χ ν European Central Bank Staff Regulations of Officials
Den 28. oktober 1999 sendte ECB's personaledirektorat sagsøgerens advokat tre samlemapper med cirka 900 sider dokumenter, der blev anset for beviser fra sagsøgtes side, samt en CD-ROM, hvorpå var gemt de pornografiske billeder og billedmontager fra internettet, som sagsøgeren havde videresendt med elektronisk post inden for og uden for ECB i løbet af den periode, der var omfattet af informatikkontrollen. kontrollen.
(Officials — Servants of the European Central Bank — Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance — Legality of conditions of employment — Rights of the defence — Dismissal — Harassment — Misuse of the internet) (Third Chamber)
Sagsøgerens advokat bestred retmæssigheden af suspensionen af 18. oktober 1999 og gjorde gældende, at henholdsvis cirkulære nr. 11/98 og de omstændigheder,
In November 1998 the applicant's computer was fitted with an internet link and a facility enabling him to send and receive electronic mail,
Den meddelte ligeledes sagsøgeren, at han for det første var under mistanke for via internettet gentagne gange at have skaffet sig adgang til dokumenter af pornografisk og politisk karakter og for at have sendt dem med elektronisk post til tredjemænd.
The applicant, who had been a servant of the European Monetary Institute (the EMI'), entered into the service of the ECB on 1 July 1998.
For det andet var han under mistanke for at have forulempet den arbejdskollega, der havde indgivet ovennævnte klage, ved navnlig at have sendt ham adskillige
He was assigned to the ECB's archives section, where he worked as a documentation
hvorunder visse beviser mod hans klient var indhentet, var ulovlige.
alleged that Circular 11/98 and the circumstances in which the evidence adduced against his client had been obtained were illegal.
Den 8. november 1999 fremkom administrationen med en begrundet udtalelse vedrørende disciplinærsagen mod sagsøgeren med henblik på at give ECB's direktion kendskab til de faktiske forhold, beviserne og den retlige kvalifikation, som blev foreslået efter denne procedure.
On 8 November 1999 the administration issued a reasoned opinion on the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the applicant, with a view to bringing to the knowledge of the Executive Board of the ECB the facts, the evidence and the legal assessment of the matter proposed following those proceedings.
skrivelse af 10. november 1999 anførte han i det væsentlige for det første, at de bebrejdelser, der var rettet mod sagsøgeren, ikke var tilstrækkeligt detaljerede til, at sagsøgeren kunne tage stilling hertil, og for det andet bestred sagsøgeren de faktiske forhold, med undtagelse af, at der var et anspændt forhold mellem ham og den kollega, der havde indgivet klagen, samt at der bla. ikke var ført bevis for, at sagsøgeren var den eneste person, der havde adgang til den computer, han var blevet tildelt.
On 18 October 1999 the administration of the ECB informed the applicant of the opening of disciplinary proceedings against him and of the fact that the Executive Board of the ECB had decided, on the same day, to suspend him from his duties pursuant to Article 44 of the Conditions of Employment, on the basis that he should continue to be paid his full basic salary. It also informed the applicant that he was suspected, first, of having repeatedly procured through the internet documents of a pornographic and political nature and of having sent them to third parties by electronic mail.
For det tredje havde ECB, såfremt det blev antaget, at de faktiske forhold var underbyggede, tilsidesat proportionalitetsprincippet, idet den havde undladt at advare sagsøgeren, inden der blev påbegyndt en disciplinærsag, med henblik på at give ham mulighed for at ændre sin adfærd.
Second, he was suspected of having importuned the colleague who had submitted the complaint, in particular by sending him numerous messages by electronic mail containing material of a pornographic and/or ideologically extreme nature, despite the fact that the colleague in question had clearly indicated that he did not approve.
Den 10. november 1999 anmodede sagsøgerens advokat om en administrativ efterprøvelse (»administrative review«) af denne afgørelse med den begrundelse, at den i ansættelsesvilkårene fastsatte disciplinærordning var ulovlig.
Thereafter, the Personnel Department, in collaboration with the competent management and the Legal Service of the ECB, heard a series of witnesses. In addition, certain checks were carried out concerning the internet sites consulted by the applicant and the electronic mail messages sent by him.
Det blev i udtalelsen konkluderet, at sagsøgeren for det første havde chikaneret en arbejdskollega ved, uagtet hans indsigelser, med elektronisk post at sende ham beskeder med et pornografisk og/eller ekstremistisk ideologisk indhold, ved at nægte at respektere denne kollegas arbejdsmiljø, ved at provokere ham med fagter af seksuel karakter, ved at antyde, at denne kollega var homoseksuel og ved at true ham med legemsbeskadigelse.
The conclusions reached in that opinion were, first, that the applicant had harassed a colleague by sending the latter by electronic mail, despite his protestations, messages containing pornographic and/or ideologically extreme material, by refusing to respect that colleague's working environment, by provoking him with gestures of a sexual nature, by insinuating that the colleague in question was homosexual and by threatening physical assault.
Sagsøgeren havde for det andet derigennem forgiftet arbejdsklimaet på det kontor, han delte med andre ECB-ansatte.
Second, the applicant was alleged thereby to have poisoned the working atmosphere in the office which he shared with other employees of the ECB.
For det tredje havde sagsøgeren misbrugt arbejdsredskaber, i dette tilfælde ved i urimeligt og utilladeligt omfang at have anvendt internettet og elektronisk post uden for arbejdsøjemed.
Third, the applicant had allegedly misused service equipment, in this instance by making unreasonable and intolerable use, for nonprofessional purposes, of the internet and of the electronic mail system.