natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
37 — Punkt 43.38 — Punkt 21 og 22.
37 — Paragraph 43.38 — Paragraphs 21 and 22.
CORPORACIÓN DERMOESTÉTICA afledt ret om reklame i almindelighed 39 eller reklame for bestemte varegrupper, såsom tobak eller lægemidler.
CORPORACIÓN DERMOESTÉTICA secondary legislation governing advertising in general 39or advertising of specific prod- ucts, such as tobacco or medicinal products.
af fællesmarkedet udgør et forbud mod eller en betydelig begrænsning af at gøre reklame i princippet en begrænsning af den frie bevægelighed, som er sikret ved traktaten, hvilket kun er foreneligt med fællesskabsretten, såfremt forbuddet eller begrænsningen er begrundet.
advertising in establishing the common market, a prohibition of advertising or a very severe restriction in that field, constitutes, in principle, a restriction on the freedoms of movement guaranteed by the Treaty and can be compatible with Community law only if it is justified.
Forbuddet mod at reklamere på nationale tv-kanaler, som fastsat i loven af 1992, hindrer således en virksomhed som Dermoestética i at anvende et særligt effektivt informationsmiddel til at gøre den italienske offentlighed bekendt med de medicinskkirurgiske kosmetiske behandlinger, som virksomhedens mange forretningssteder i Italien tilbyder.
The prohibition of advertising on national television networks laid down in the 1992 Law thus deprives a company such as Dermoestética of the opportunity of using a particularly effective means of communication for informing the general Italian public about the medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature offered in its many branches in Italy.
Dette forbud udgør derfor efter min opfattelse en begrænsning af etableringsfriheden.
In my opinion, therefore, that prohibition is a restriction on freedom of establishment.
Selskabet Dermoestética, der er part i sagen ved den nationale ret, driver virksomhed inden for kosmetisk pleje. Selskabet har åbnet skønhedsklinikker i flere italienske byer og skal derfor skabe sig en kundekreds og med dette for øje gøres kendt for offentligheden.
In the main proceedings, a company like Dermoestética, which pursues its activities in the field of beauty treatment and has treatment centres in a number of Italian cities, needs to build up a client-base and, in order to do so, to become known to the general public.
Denne vurdering synes bekræftet af, at virkningerne af dette forbud for en virksomhed, der har sit hjemsted i en anden medlemsstat, hverken kompenseres eller mindskes ved muligheden af i Italien, jævnfør loven af 1992, at gøre reklame på lokale tv-kanaler eller via andre kommunikationsmidler.
I consider that that analysis is supported by the fact that the effects of that prohibition on an undertaking with a registered office in another Member State are not compensated for or even attenuated by the possibility, provided for in the 1992 Law, of advertising such services on local television networks in Italy or through other means of communication.
39 — Rådets direktiv 84/450/EØF af 10.9.1984 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser om vildledende reklame (EFT L 250, s. 17).
39 — Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising (OJ 1984 L 250, p. 17).
Direktiv 84/450, som ændret, blev ophævet og erstattet med Europa-Parla-mentets og Rådets direktiv 2006/114/EF af 12.12.2006 om vildledende og sammenlignende reklame (EUT L 376, s. 21).
Directive 84/450, as amended, was repealed and replaced by Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 21).
Fjernsynet er et informationsmiddel, der når ud til et bredt publikum.
In addition, television is a means of information which reaches a very wide audience.
Via fjernsynet kan en virksomhed på meget effektiv vis gøre sine produkter og tjenester kendt i en hel medlemsstat.
It allows an undertaking to make all its products and services known throughout the territory of a Member State in a very effect- ive way.
Interessen hos erhvervsdrivende for dette kommunikationsmiddel har i øvrigt fået fællesskabslovgiver til i direktiv 89/552 at fastsætte nogle minimumsregler og -normer, der skal overholdes i forbindelse med fjernsynsreklame for at beskytte forbrugerne mod overdreven brug heraf, ud over de forpligtelser, der er nævnt i andre tekster i
Moreover, the success of that form of communication for professionals has led the Community legislature to lay down, in Directive 89/552, minimum rules and standards with which television advertisements must comply in order to protect consumers against excesses in that domain, in addition to the obligations laid down in other
Denne mulighed er underkastet to betingelser, der for en udenlandsk virksomhed, der ønsker at etablere sig i Italien, ubestrideligt begrænser mulighederne herfor.
That possibility is subject to two conditions, which undeniably limit its scope for a foreign undertaking wishing to establish itself in Italy.
Den første betingelse er, at der fra de kompetente lokale administrative myndigheder skal opnås en tilladelse.
The first of those conditions is the need to obtain authorisation from the competent local administrative authority.
lovgivning desuden en »flerledseffekt«, idet en begrænsning af reklamen fører til et dårligere resultat for virksomheden, og dette dårligere resultat udgør grundlaget for det beløb, der må anvendes til reklame.
effect, in that the limitation on advertising reduces the undertaking’s income, which, itself, determines the amount of the expenditure which may be devoted to advertising.
Den uklare betydning af begrebet angivne indkomst udgør endvidere en yderligere vanskelighed for en udenlandsk virksomhed.
In addition, the lack of precision in the concept of declared income constitutes an additional difficulty for a foreign undertaking.
Endelig fremgår det af tvisten i hovedsagen, at Dermoestética ikke anser den mulighed i loven af 1992 for, under forudsætning af at de to betingelser i artikel 5 og 9a er opfyldt, at reklamere på de lokale tv-kanaler og via andre kommunikationsmidler, som en tilfredsstillende løsning, der opvejer det forhold, at det ikke er muligt at reklamere på nationale tv-kanaler.
Finally, the main proceedings show that Dermoestética did not regard the possibility provided for in the 1992 Law of broadcasting advertisements on local television networks or through other means of communication, under the two conditions laid down in Art -icles 5 and 9a of that law, as a satisfactory solution to their being unable to advertise on national television networks.
For at sende en reklame i hele Den Italienske Republik via de lokale tv-kanaler skal et selskab som Dermoestética indgive lige så mange ansøgninger, som der er lokale myndigheder, hvilket forekommer åbenbart mere kompliceret og bekosteligt.
The broadcasting of an advertisement throughout the Italian Republic by means of local television networks would therefore require a company such as Dermoestética to obtain as many authorisations as there are competent regional authorities, which is obviously more complicated and burdensome.
Desuden fremgår det af de oplysninger, den forelæggende ret har givet, at den italienske lovgivning ikke fastlægger betingelserne for at opnå denne tilladelse, hvorfor disse betingelser kan variere fra region til region, og at det ikke er let for en erhvervsdrivende som Dermoestética at få kendskab til betingelserne på forhånd.
In addition, on the basis of the information supplied by the referring court, the Italian legislation does not lay down the conditions for obtaining the authorisation, with the result that those conditions may vary from one region to another and an economic operator such as Dermoestética cannot easily be familiar with them in advance.
Eftersom loven af 1992 forbyder enhver reklame på nationale tv-kanaler for medicinskkirurgiske kosmetiske behandlinger i dertil behørigt anerkendte private etablissementer, udgør den en hindring for etableringsfriheden.
In so far it as prohibits all broadcasting of advertisements on national television networks for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature carried out in private health care establishments, the 1992 Law therefore constitutes a restriction on freedom of establishment.
Den anden betingelse er, at udgifterne for denne reklame ikke må overstige 5% af den for det foregående år angivne indkomst.
The second condition is that the expenditure incurred in such advertising must not exceed 5% of declared income for the preceding year.
De pågældende bestemmelser kan ligeledes opfattes som en restriktion for den frie udveksling af grænseoverskridende tjenesteydelser i artikel 49 EF’s forstand.
Moreover, those provisions may also be analysed as a restriction on freedom to provide crossborder services within the meaning of Article 49 EC.
Som Kommissionen har påpeget, udgør denne betingelse ligeledes en hindring for, at virksomheder med hjemsted i en anden medlemsstat kan etablere sig i Italien, da den begrænser deres mulighed for at bruge så mange penge, som de finder nødvendigt med henblik på at udbrede kendskabet til deres tjenester.
As the Commission has pointed out, that condition also constitutes a barrier to companies established in other Member States establishing themselves in Italy because, first, its limits their freedom to incur expenditure which they consider necessary to make themselves known in the most appropriate way.
Ved at fastsætte et procentuelt udgiftsloft, der er baseret på resultaterne fra det foregående år, skaber den pågældende
Secondly, by fixing the limit at a percentage of income for the previous year, the legislation at issue produces a ‘knock on’
Da det i henhold til loven af 1992 er forbudt for Advertising Media samt
By preventing Advertising Media and the national television networks from advertising
Beskyttelsen af den offentlighed sundhed er ganske vist en af de grunde, der efter artikel 46 EF og 55 EF kan begrunde en begrænsning af etableringsfriheden og den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser.
It is true that the protection of public health is one the reasons which may, pursuant to Articles 46 EC and 55 EC, justify a restriction on freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services.
Domstolen har i denne forbindelse fastslået, at menneskers liv og helbred indtager den vigtigste plads blandt de hensyn, der er beskyttet i henhold til traktatbestemmelserne om mulige undtagelser til forbuddet mod begrænsninger af den frie bevægelighed 41.
The Court has held that the health and life of humans rank foremost among the interests protected by the provisions of the Treaty laying down permissible derogations from the prohib -ition of restrictions on the freedoms of movement.
Beskyttelsen af den offentlige sundhed figurerer endvidere blandt de tvingende almene hensyn, der kan begrunde restriktioner mod udøvelsen af den traktatsikrede frie bevægelighed.
41The protection of public health is also one of the overriding requirements of general interest which can justify restrictions on the exercise of the freedoms of movement guaranteed by the Treaty.
I det omfang reklame for medicinskkirurgiske kosmetiske behandlinger ikke er omfattet af fælles eller harmoniserede regler på fællesskabsplan, tilkommer det medlemsstaterne at afgøre, på hvilket niveau de vil sikre beskyttelsen af den offentlige sundhed, og hvorledes de vil nå deres mål 42.
In addition, since there are no common or harmonised rules at Community level governing the advertising of medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature, it is for each Member State to decide on the degree of protection it intends to afford to public health in that field and on the way on which that level of protection is to be achieved. 42
Den italienske regering påberåber sig ingen grund, der kan retfærdiggøre begrænsningerne i de undersøgte bestemmelser i loven af 1992.
The Italian Government puts forward no ground capable of justifying the restrictions in the provisions of the 1992 Law that have been considered.
Derimod har den stiltiende erkendt, at disse begrænsninger er uforenelige med fællesskabsretten, eftersom den gør gældende, at de pågældende bestemmelser er blevet ophævet ved lovdekret nr. 223/2006, der i henhold til dekretets artikel 2 blev vedtaget i overensstemmelse med principperne om fri konkurrence for at sikre brugerne en reel valgmulighed takket være adgangen til at sammenligne de tjenesteydelser, der tilbydes på markedet.
On the contrary, it implicitly admits that the restrictions are indeed incompatible with Community law, inasmuch as it states that the provisions at issue were repealed by Decree-Law No 223/2006, which was adopted, according to Article 2 thereof, in accordance with the principle of free competition so as to guarantee consumers a proper choice by enabling them to compare services offered on the market.
I mit forslag til afgørelse fremsat den 22. november 2007 i Doulamis-sagen (sag C-446/05), der verserer for Domstolen, anførte jeg, at beskyttelsen af den offentlige sundhed kunne udgøre en gyldig begrundelse for at forbyde personer inden for sundhedsplejen såsom dem, der yder tandpleje, at gøre andet end ren informativ reklame.
In my Opinion delivered on 22 November 2007 in Case C-446/05, Doulamis, which is still pending before the Court, I argued that the protection of public health could justify a prohibition on advertising, other than in a purely informative manner, by health care professionals such as providers of dental care.
Jeg baserede mit synspunkt på den omstændighed, at behandlingsydelser ikke kan sammenlignes
I based my pos -ition on the fact that health-care services differ from other services, inasmuch as they
Det må imidlertid fordres, at de foranstaltninger der vedtages herom, er egnede til at sikre virkeliggørelsen af det formål, de forfølger, og ikke går ud over, hvad der er nødvendigt for at opnå dette 43.
The measures in question must, however, be appropriate for the purpose of achieving the objective sought and must not go beyond what is necessary for that purpose. 43 affect the physical integrity and psychological equilibrium of the recipient.
Jeg henviste ligeledes til den omstændighed, at sundhedsområdet udgør et af de områder, hvor forskellen i niveauet for tjenesteudbyderens og modtageren af tjenesteydelsernes kundskab er størst, således at sidstnævnte ikke er i stand til reelt at vurdere kvaliteten af den tjenesteydelse, han køber.
I also referred to the fact that the field of health-care is one in which the difference in the level of knowledge between the person providing the service and the recipient is of the highest, so that the latter is not in a position to make a genuine assessment of the quality of the service he is purchasing.
Formålet med et forbud mod reklame på nationale tv-kanaler for medicinsk-kirur-gisk kosmetiske behandlinger er at begrænse reklamen for sådanne behandlinger i forhold til offentligheden og således beskytte den offentlige sundhed. Når reklamen på visse vilkår tillades på lokale tv-kanaler, kan et forbud mod al reklame på nationale tv-kanaler imidlertid ikke anses for at være forholdsmæssigt.
The effect of a prohibition on broadcasting advertisements on national television networks for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature is indeed to limit the advertising of such services to the public and, consequently, to protect public health.
Disse overvejelser kan udstrækkes til også at gælde for området for kosmetiske behandlinger, når disse ikke begrænser sig til tjenesteydelser inden for velvære såsom afslappende massage eller hårfjerning, men har karakter af egentlige kirurgiske indgreb, såsom ændringer af dele af ansigtet eller kroppen.
I think that those considerations can be extended to cosmetic treatments, since such treatments are not limited to services which promote well-being, such as relaxing massages or waxing, but can take the form of actual surgical operations, such as the re-modelling of part of the face or the body.
Hvis den italienske lovgiver mener, at bestemmelserne vedrørende en sådan reklame på lokale tv-kanaler er egnede til at beskytte den offentlige sundhed, er det vanskeligt at forstå, hvorfor sådanne bestemmelser ikke også kan anvendes på reklamer på nationale tv-kanaler.
If the Italian legislature considered that the conditions imposed on such advertising on local television networks were appropriate to protect public health, I do not see why such conditions should not also apply to national television networks.
Der er intet, der giver anledning til at antage, at beskyttelsen af tv-seerne skal være mindre, når de ser lokalt tv.
There is no reason to believe that viewers should be less protected when they watch local television stations.
43 — Jf. i denne retning dom af 25.7.1991, forenede sager C-1/90 og C-176/90, Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior og Publivía, Sml. I, s. 4151, præmis 16.
43 — See, to that effect, Joined Cases C-1/90 and C-176/90 Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior and Publivía [1991] ECR I-4151, paragraph 16.
Selv om sådanne kirurgiske indgreb kan udføres på patientens anmodning, uden at der foreligger et terapeutisk behov, mener jeg, at en medlemsstat, henset til de risici, der er forbundet med en sådan operation og de eventuelle psykiske følger heraf, lovligt kan foreskrive begrænsninger hvad angår den reklame, der rettes til offentligheden.
Even though such surgical operations may be carried out at the request of the patient, without there being any real therapeutic need, I am of opinion that, because of the risks inherent in that type of medical procedure and its possible psychological repercussions, a Member State may legitimately impose restrictions on the advertising of such procedures to the public.
Det er derfor fuldt berettiget, at en medlemsstat forbyder eller regulerer reklamevirksomhed, hvis formål er at opfordre folk til at få foretaget ændringer af deres ansigt eller anatomi.
I consider therefore that a Member State is perfectly justified in prohibiting or restricting advertising intended to persuade people to alter their face or their anatomy.
Som Kommissionen fremhæver, er loven af 1992 inkonsekvent, da den italienske lovgiver, hvis denne virkelig havde til hensigt at beskytte tv-seernes sundhed ved at forbyde tv-reklame for medicinsk-kirurgisk kosmetiske behandlinger, burde have udstrakt dette forbud til også at gælde for de lokale tv-kanaler.
As the Commission pointed out, the 1992 Law is thus vitiated by a definite inconsistency inasmuch as, if the intention of the Italian legislature had really been to protect viewers’ health by prohibiting television advertising for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature, it should have extended the prohibition to local television networks.
ligestillede personer, tilbyde tjenesteydelser vedrørende udarbejdelse og trykning af lønsedler til virksomheder med mere end 250 ansatte, som ikke i denne henseende synes at burde nyde en ringere beskyttelse end dem, der arbejder for virksomheder med færre ansatte.
printing pay slips to undertakings with more than 250 employees, who did not appear to require less protection in that regard than those who worked for undertakings with smaller work forces.
Domstolen udledte heraf, at da de omhandlede opgaver ikke synes mindre komplicerede, når antallet af berørte lønmodtagere stiger, går den omtvistede bestemmelse under alle omstændigheder ud over, hvad der er nødvendigt for at opnå dens beskyttelsesformål 44.
It concluded that, since the tasks in question could not be any less complex when the number of salaried staff concerned increased, the disputed provision went, in any event, beyond what was necessary to attain its objective of protection. 44
I denne henseende indebærer loven af 1992 samme indre konflikt som den pågældende italienske lovgivning i sagen Payroll m.fl.
In that regard, the 1992 Law contains the same contradiction as the Italian legislation at issue in Payroll and Others.
Forbuddet mod enhver form for reklame på nationale tv-kanaler for medi-cinsk-kirurgisk kosmetiske behandlinger synes således at gå ud over, hvad der er nødvendigt for at beskytte den offentlige sundhed.
The prohibition of all broadcasting of advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature on national television networks thus appears to go beyond what is necessary to protect public health.
Denne vurdering bekræftes ligeledes af den omstændighed, at forbuddet kun, som den italienske regering oplyste under retsmødet, rammer private etablissementer inden for sundhedssektoren.
That analysis is further confirmed by the fact that, as the Italian Government explained at the hearing, the prohibition applies only to private medical establishments.
Den pågældende lovgivning pålagde virksomheder med mindre end 250 ansatte, som vil overlade udarbejdelse og trykning af lønsedler til eksterne databehandlingscentre, kun at gøre brug af de databehandlingscentre, der er oprettet og udelukkende består af personer, der er optaget i registrene over visse erhverv i Italien.
That legislation required undertakings with fewer than 250 employees which wished to entrust the preparation and printing of their pay slips to outside data-processing centres to have recourse only to centres established and staffed exclusively by persons registered with certain professional associations in Italy.
Den pågældende lovgivning blev anset for at udgøre en hindring af etableringsfriheden for selskaber, hvis hjemsted ligger i en anden medlemsstat, og som ønsker at etablere sig på det italienske marked for dér at tilbyde edb-tjenester vedrørende lønberegning og udarbejdelse og trykning af lønsedler.
That legislation was found to be a restriction on the freedom of establishment of companies having their registered office in another Member State which intended to establish themselves in Italy in order to provide computer services for the preparation and printing of pay slips there.
Følgelig er artikel 43 EF og 49 EF, sammenholdt med artikel 48 EF og 55 EF, til hinder for en medlemsstats lovgivning, som forbyder reklame på nationale tv-kanaler for medicinskkirurgiske kosmetiske behandlinger i dertil behørigt anerkendte private etablissementer inden for sundhedssektoren, mens en sådan reklame, på visse betingelser, er tilladt på lokale tv-kanaler.
Consequently, the legislation of a Member State which prohibits the broadcasting of advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature carried out in private health care establishments on national television networks, while permitting such advertisements, under certain conditions, on local television networks, is incompatible with Articles 43 EC and 49 EC, read in conjunction with Art -icles 48 EC and 55 EC.
Den italienske regering gjorde gældende, at denne hindring var begrundet i hensynet til beskyttelse af arbejdstagernes rettigheder.
The Italian Government contended that the restriction was justified by the need to protect of workers’ rights.
Domstolen fastslog i denne henseende, at ifølge den pågældende italienske lovgivning kan databehandlingscentre, som ikke er oprettet og udelukkende består af arbejdsmarkedskonsulenter eller hermed
The Court pointed out that under the Italian legislation in question, the data-processing centres which were not established and staffed only by employment consultants or persons of equivalent status could offer services of calculating and
I lyset af det ovenstående foreslår jeg derfor Domstolen at besvare de af Giudice di pace di Genova forelagte spørgsmål således:
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court should answer the questions referred to it by the Giudice di Pace di Genova as follows: