natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Således som det fremgår ovenfor, afholdt Kongeriget Belgien udgifter, der svarede til den pågældende støtte, med urigtig hjemmel, hvilket medførte, at de i henhold til artikel 5, stk. 2, litra c), i forordning nr. 729/70 blev udelukket fra EF-finansiering, uafhængigt af om der er fastslået uregelmæssigheder eller forsømmelser fra de belgiske myndigheders side.
(Action for damages — Admissibility — Non-contractual liability — Ombudsman — Handling of a complaint by the Ombudsman) (Third Chamber)
Andet led af det første anbringende er således ubegrundet.
Case T-51/01 Joachim Fronia ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Faktiske omstændigheder
16 April 2002
Kongeriget Belgien ydede støtte til Corman til fremstilling af ΒΓΤΑ i henhold til artikel 1 i forordning nr. 570/88 som ændret.
(Officials — Reorganisation of the Commission's administrative structures of a former Head of Unit as an ad personam adviser) (Second Chamber)
blevet udvekslet et stort antal oplysninger vedrørende fortolkningen af de gældende bestemmelser mellem Kommissionen og de belgiske myndigheder i løbet af 1991 og 1995 i forbindelse med spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der for BITA kunne modtages støtte fra Fællesskabet.
Case T-325/00 Else Sada ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Den belgiske regering har med det fjerde anbringende kritiseret Kommissionen for at have tilsidesat princippet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning.
Opinion 1/00 Opinion pursuant to Article 300(6) EC External relations
Det følger heraf, at Kommissionen på intet tidspunkt skabte en situation, der gav Kongeriget Belgien grundlag for en berettiget forventning om, at EUGFL ville afholde udgifterne til den støtte, der var ydet til BITA i henhold til artikel 1 i forordning nr. 570/88 som ændret. Kommissionens henvisning til dommen i sagen Corman mod Kommissionen kan ikke i denne sammenhæng så tvivl om denne bedømmelse.
I — Background to the request for an opinion establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (the 'ECAA Agreement') to be concluded between the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the European Community, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Slovenia ('the Contracting Parties'), and particularly of the system of legal supervision provided for therein.
2) Kongeriget Belgien betaler sagens omkostninger.«
At its meeting on 3 October 1996, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into
Generaladvokat CStix-Hackl fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet fSjette Afdeling) den 29. november 2001.
It had been made clear at that time that any opening of the Community air transport market should be undertaken in parallel with alignment of the legislation of the Associated States with the acquis communautaire in the aviation sector, with liberalisation and harmonisation moving forward together.
Hun foreslog Domstolen at træffe følgende afgørelse:
Article 16 provides that State aid is incompatible with the ECAA Agreement, subject to certain exceptions.
»1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
A version of the ECAA Agreement ('the proposed agreement' or 'the proposed ECAA Agreement') was produced following a multilateral meeting in June 1999, which was also attended by the Kingdom of Norway and the Republic of Iceland, and bilateral meetings held in the second half of 1999.
Kongeriget Belgien betaler sagens omkostninger.«
Article 17 requires the Contracting Parties to ensure that rights derived from the ECAA Agreement, including the legislative provisions referred to in Annex I thereto, may be invoked before the national courts.
Sag T-209/00 Frank Lamberts / Den Europæiske Ombudsmand Regler for institutionerne
Article 17 also confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Court to review the legality of decisions taken by Community institutions under the ECAA Agreement.
»Erstatningssøgsmål — formaliteten — ansvar uden for kontraktforhold — Den Europæiske Ombudsmand — ombudsmandens behandling af en klage«
Articles 19 to 22 make the competent Community authorities responsible for enforcing Articles 12 and 13 ol the agreement where trade with the Community is affected and for the controls provided for in Articles 14 to 16.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
For the purposes of this Opinion, it should be cited in full:
Sag T-51/01 Joachim Fronia / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Article 7 provides for companies or firms to be treated in the same way as nationals.
»Tjenestemænd—omorganisering af Kommissionens administrative struktur—en tidligere chef for en enhed genindplaceres som konsulent ad personam« (Anden Afdeling)
In so far as the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the acts specified in Annex I are identical in
Sag T-325/00 Elke Sada / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Decisions taken by the Joint Committee under this procedure shall be in conformity with the caselaw of the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
»Tjenestemænd — midlertidigt ansat — arbejdsløshedsunderstøttelse — afslag« (Fjerde Afdeling)
It provides that the Joint Committee is to be informed if a Contracting Party makes such an amendment.
Udtalelse 1/00 Udtalelse i medfør af artikel 300, stk. 6, EF Forbindelserne udadtil
Dispute resolution is dealt with in Article 27 of the proposed agreement, which provides:
»Udtalelse i medfør af artikel 300, stk 6, EF — forslag til aftale mellem Det Europæiske Fællesskab og tredjelande om oprettelse af et fælleseuropæisk luftfartsområde« (Domstolens plenum)
A Contracting Party may bring a matter under dispute which concerns the application of this Agreement before the Joint Committee, except where specific procedures are set out in this Agreement and in particular in Articles 17(2) and (3), 19, 20, 22(1) to (4), 23(2) and (3).
I — Redegørelse for begæringen om udtalelse
The depositary shall inform the other Contracting Parties.
Ved begæring indgivet til Domstolens Justitskontor den 13. oktober 2000 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anmodet Domstolen om en udtalelse i medfør af artikel 300, stk. 6, EF
Where, in accordance with the provisions of the paragraph above, a court of a Contracting Party against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law is not able to make a reference to the
Kommissionen har anmodet Domstolen om en udtalelse om, hvorvidt den foreslåede aftale om oprettelse af et fælleseuropæisk luftfartsområde
In cases where the Community is not a party to the dispute, a Community representative may be invited in [sic] the
påtænkte aftale, er blandt de regler, der skal gælde for de kontraherende parter.
tribunal may refer such questions to the Court, or (iii) to combine the two options.
I henhold til artikel 6 er der ingen begrænsninger for den frie etableringsret for statsborgere fra medlemsstaterne og de deltagende stater.
The parties to the dispute may draw up a proposed solution which shall immediately be submitted to the Joint Committee.
I artikel 7 er det fastsat, at selskaber er ligestillet med disse statsborgere.
Decisions taken by the Joint Committee under this procedure shall not affect the caselaw of the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Ifølge forslagets artikel 10 kan en kontraherende part ophæve eller ændre driftstilladelsen, såfremt der er tvivl med hensyn til sikkerheden i et luftfartsselskab.
The modalities according to which such referrals may be made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities are set out in Protocol IV.
Det var i den forbindelse blevet gjort klart, at enhver åbning af Fællesskabets luftfartsmarked skulle ske sideløbende med en tilnærmelse af de associerede staters lovgivning til Fællesskabets bestemmelser for luftfartssektoren, idet der blev planlagt en trinvis proces med et parallelt forløb mellem liberalisering og harmonisering.
A Contracting Party shall not take safeguard measures on a matter which has been referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in accordance with this Agreement, except in cases defined in Article 10(2), or in compliance with mechanisms provided for in individual acts specified in Annex I.'
Efter et multilateralt møde i juni 1999, hvor også Kongeriget Norge og Republikken Island deltog, samt bilaterale møder i anden halvdel af 1999 nåede man frem til en affattelse af den påtænkte FELO-aftale (herefter »den påtænkte aftale« eller »forslaget til FELO-aftalen«), som de nævnte to stater og de associerede stater (herefter under ét benævnt »de deltagende stater«) gav udtryk for deres tilslutning til.
According to some of the language versions of point 15 of the request for an opinion, the Court is asked to rule on the compatibility with the provisions of the Treaty of the system of 'judicial' supervision provided for by the proposed agreement (for example 'gerichtliche Kontrolle' in the German version, 'judicial supervision' in the English version and 'controllo giurisdizionale' in the Italian version).
For så vidt angår konkurrencereglerne er alle aftaler mellem virksomheder, alle vedtagelser inden for sammenslutninger af virksomheder og alle former for konkurrenceforvridende samordnet praksis i henhold til den påtænkte aftales artikel 12 forbudt, mens dette ifølge artikel 13 også gælder med hensyn til misbrug af dominerende stilling.
However, it is clear from other language versions of the request for an opinion that it concerns the system of 'legal' supervision envisaged by the proposed agreement (for example 'surveillance juridique' in the French version and Vigilancia jurídica' in the Spanish version).
Artikel 14 omhandler virksomhedssammenslutninger og artikel 15 offentlige virksomheder eller virksomheder, som er tildelt særlige eller eksklusive rettigheder, samt virksomheder, der har fået overdraget at udføre tjenesteydelser af almindelig økonomisk interesse, eller som har karakter af et fiskalt monopol.
Likewise, it is apparent from the request for an opinion as a whole, and specifically from the statement in which the Commission raises the issue of the compatibility with the Treaty of 'in particular' Article 23(2) and (3) of the proposed agreement, that the request concerns not only the compatibility of the mechanisms of a judicial nature provided for by the proposed agreement but also that of all the provisions thereof which seek to ensure uniform implementation and interpretation of the ECAA Agreement and the annexes thereto and to avoid or resolve disputes.
I artikel 16 er det fastsat, at medmindre andet bestemmes i aftalen, er enhver form for statsstøtte uforenelig med FELO-aftalen.
Accordingly, the request for an opinion concerns Articles 17, 23 and 27 of, and Protocol IV to, the agreement.
ΠΙ — Gennemgang af forslaget til FELO-aftalen
The ECAA Agreement will be concluded, as the Commission points out in its request for an opinion, between the Community and the States Parties, namely States which are not members of the Community.
FELO-aftalens formål er at basere adgangen til de kontraherende parters luftfartsmarkeder på ensartede regler, som er hentet i gældende lovgivning herom i Fællesskabet, og som vedrører fri markedsadgang, fri etableringsret, ligelige konkurrencevilkår og sikkerheds- og miljøbestemmelser.
The purpose of the ECAA Agreement is, according to Article 1 of the proposed agreement, 'the creation of a European Common Aviation Area ... based on free market access, freedom of establishment, equal conditions of competition and common rules -
I henhold til forslagets artikel 17 skal hver enkelt kontraherende part drage omsorg for, at de rettigheder, som følger af FELO-aftalen, og navnlig af de i bilag I anførte forordninger og direktiver, kan påberåbes ved de nationale domstole.
Protocol IV deals with referrals to the Court. It provides in Part 1 that where the Court has jurisdiction by reason of Article 23(2) the procedures established for referrals for preliminary rulings within the European Community are to apply and the States Parties are to have the same right to submit observations as the Member States.
Det hedder således nærmere i bestemmelsen: »I tilfælde, som kan påvirke faktiske eller potentielle luftfartstjenester, som godkendes i henhold til denne aftale, besidder fællesskabsinstitutionerne den kompetence, som de er tildelt i henhold til de retsakter, som denne aftales bilag I anfører eller henviser til.«
Part 2 of Protocol IV provides that States Parties may decide either (i) that courts or tribunals of last instance are to request the Court to give a preliminary ruling on questions of interpretation or validity where a decision on the question is necessary to enable them to give a judgment, or (ii) that any court or
I samme artikel er det fastsat, at spørgsmål vedrørende gyldigheden af beslutninger, som fællesskabsinstitutionerne træffer i medfør af FELO-aftalen, udelukkende kan indbringes for Domstolen.
agreement relating to the creation of the EEA, on which its opinion had been requested, undermined the autonomy of the Community legal order and was, accordingly, incompatible with the Treaty, inasmuch as, in view of the concern for homogeneity expressed by its authors, it was proposed inter alia to entrust final decisions on interpretation of the rules of that agreement, in substance identical to those of Community law, to an EEA Court, which could, moreover, have found it necessary to rule on the distribution of powers between the Community and the Member States (Opinion 1/91, paragraphs 30 to 46).
skønnes nødvendigt, for at der kan afsiges en kendelse, EF-Domstolen om at tage stilling til spørgsmålet.
including in the safety and environment areas'.
En aftalestat kan i en afgørelse og i henhold til protokol IV anføre, i hvilket omfang og på hvilke vilkår dens domstole og nævn må anvende denne bestemmelse.
The preamble to the agreement begins by recognising the 'integrated character of international civil aviation' and affirms that the ECAA is based on 'respect [for] the same rules', those of 'the relevant legislation in force within the European Community'.
En sådan afgørelse skal meddeles depositaren og EF-Domstolen. Depositaren underretter de øvrige kontraherende parter.
It states that the Contracting Parties bear in mind 'the commitment of each of the Associated States in the Europe Agreements to make its laws compatible with those of the Community'.
Det fremgår af forslagets artikel 19-22, at det påhviler Fællesskabets kompetente myndighed at sikre håndhævelsen af aftalens artikel 12 og 13, såfremt samhandelen med Fællesskabet er berørt, og at foretage de tilsyn, der er fastsat i artikel 1416.
The Contracting Parties are therefore seeking a high level of integration which entails, as the Commission makes clear in its request for an opinion, the establishment of mechanisms which effectively ensure that the provisions of the ECAA Agreement and the fundamental rules to which its annexes refer are applied and interpreted in a uniform manner.
Forslagets artikel 23 indeholder en præcisering af de regler, der gælder med hensyn til fortolkningen af aftalen. Denne bestemmelse bør med henblik på udtalelsen citeres i sin helhed:
The proposed agreement is inspired by aims similar to those of the EEA Agreement, two versions of which were the subject of Opinions 1/91 and 1/92, cited above.
Hvis Det Blandede Udvalg inden to måneder efter at have fået forelagt konflikten mellem EF-Domstolens retspraksis og den dom, der er afsagt af en domstol i den kontraherende part ikke har kunnet sikre den ensartede fortolkning af aftalen, kan den i artikel 27 nævnte procedure anvendes.«
Although the proposed agreement, unlike the EEA Agreement, is limited to one sector, air transport, its aim, like that of the EEA Agreement, is to extend the acquis communautaire to new States, by implementing in a larger geographical area rules which are essentially those of Community law.
I forslagets artikel 24 understreges det, at aftalen »ikke er til hinder for, at de kontraherende parter under forudsætning af, at princippet om ikke-forskelsbehandling [...] overholdes, ensidigt kan ændre deres egen lovgivning på punkter, der er omfattet af denne aftale«.
The Contracting Parties have also set themselves the task, in particular in order to avoid any distortion of the rules of competition, of implementing and complying with those common rules as uniformly as possible, endeavouring to cooperate in good faith.
Det Blandede Udvalg skal underrettes, når en kontraherende part har vedtaget en sådan ændring.
That is how the provisions of the ECAA Agreement relating to legal supervision, the wording of which is, on many points, directly inspired by that of the EEA Agreement, are to be understood.
For så vidt bestemmelserne i denne aftale og bestemmelserne i de retsakter, som anføres i bilag I, i substansen er identiske med de tilsvarende regler i EF-traktaten og med de retsakter, som er vedtaget til gennemførelse af EF-traktaten, fortolkes disse bestemmelser ved gennemførelsen og anvendelsen i overensstemmelse med de relevante afgørelser og beslutninger, som EF-Domstolen og Europa-Kommissionen har truffet forud for undertegnelsen af denne aftale.
Conversely, where an agreement more clearly separates the Community from the other Contracting Parties from an institutional point of view and no longer affects either the exercise by the Community and its institutions of their powers by changing the nature of those powers, or the interpretation of Community law, the autonomy of the Community legal order can be considered to be secure.
Afgørelser og beslutninger, som er truffet efter undertegnelsen af denne aftale, meddeles de øvrige kontraherende parter.
In particular, the risk that the foundations of the Community might be affected as a result of implementation of an agreement is even lower where the States Parties to that agreement are members of a single organisation, which has its own judicial body and surveillance authority, distinct from the Community institutions.
Efter anmodning fra en af de kontraherende parter vurderer Det Blandede Udvalg konsekvenserne af sådanne senere afgørelser og beslutninger for at sikre denne aftales funktion.
That was the position in the case of the second version of the agreement relating to the creation of the EEA submitted to the Court for an opinion, which the Court found to be compatible with the Treaty in view of the different framework: the proposal for an EEA Court had been abandoned, the EFTA Court had been created and decisions taken by the committee responsible for resolving differences between the Community and the EFTA States and for ensuring uniform interpretation as regards the EEA rules could in no circumstances affect the caselaw of the Court (Opinion 1/92, paragraphs 18 to 35).
Eksisterende fortolkninger meddeles forud for undertegnelsen af aftalen til aftalestaterne heri.
The proposed ECAA Agreement has objectives comparable to those of the EEA Agreement but a different institutional structure.
Afgørelser, som er truffet af Det Blandede Udvalg i henhold til denne procedure, skal være i overensstemmelse med EF-Domstolens retspraksis.
Whilst the EEA Agreement is based on the 'twin pillar' of the Communities on the one hand and the EFTA on the other, the proposed agreement provides for the ECAA to be founded on a 'single pillar', a solution which is made possible and necessary by the absence of pre-existing institutional links
De nærmere regler vedrørende Det Blandede Udvalg er indeholdt i forslagets artikel 25 og 26. Det Blandede Udvalg sammensættes af repræsentanter for de kontraherende parter, og Fællesskabet har én stemme for hver af sine medlemsstater.
The endeavour to achieve uniform interpretation and application of those rules might, in certain circumstances, affect the powers of the Community and its institutions, or the canons of interpretation of Community law, to such an extent as to alter their essential character.
Udvalget træffer i princippet afgørelse med enstemmighed. Udvalgets afgørelser er bindende for de kontraherende parter.
An agreement which had such an effect on the Community legal order could not be adopted solely on the basis of Article 300 EC, in that it would undermine the foundations of the Community and hence the Treaty itself.
Forslagets artikel 27 omhandler forligsordninger. Bestemmelsen har følgende ordlyd:
The Court held therefore that the first version of the
I protokollens afsnit 3 er det præciseret, at henvisninger til Domstolen i henhold til FELO-aftalens artikel 27 behandles på samme måde som tvistigheder, der forelægges Domstolen i henhold til artikel 239 EF.
with the common rules applying within the ECAA as regards competition, safety, the environment and social matters, making it easier for the Commission to carry out its new functions.
Protokollens afsnit 4 regulerer anvendelsen af sprog ved procedurer for Domstolen.
It constitutes the main guarantee that conditions of market access will be the same for operators and nationals of States Parties or States covered by the ECAA Agreement.
Når en tvist er indbragt for Det Blandede Udvalg i henhold til stk. 1, afholdes der straks samråd mellem parterne i tvisten. I tilfælde, hvor Fællesskabet ikke er part i tvisten, kan en af parterne i den indbyde Fællesskabets repræsentant til at deltage i samrådet.
However, the effect of the policies thus reflected in the proposed agreement is, first, to bring about the juxtaposition within a single geographical area (that of the ECAA) of rules of Community law and rules replicating them, which will not be applied or interpreted systematically by the same authorities or bodies.
Parterne i tvisten kan udarbejde et løsningsforslag, som straks forelægges Det Blandede Udvalg.
That might give rise to differences prejudicial to the operation of the ECAA Agreement.
Afgørelser, som Det Blandede Udvalg træffer i henhold til denne procedure, påvirker ikke EF-Domstolens retspraksis.
Another consequence of those policies is that the Commission is made responsible for applying a number of rules in that agreement outside the Community, thereby creating specific relations between the Community and the States Parties.
Hvis det ikke er lykkedes Det Blandede Udvalg at træffe en afgørelse om bilæggelse af tvisten tre måneder efter den dato, hvor sagen blev indbragt for den, kan parterne i tvisten indbringe sagen for EF-Domstolen, som træffer endelig og bindende afgørelse. Sager kan indbringes for EF-Domstolen på de vilkår, som anføres i protokol IV.
Where Community legislation provides that the Community institutions, in particular the Commission, are competent, the same institutions are in many cases competent as regards the competition rules for the purpose of applying the corresponding provisions referred to in the proposed agreement throughout the ECAA.
Hvis Det Blandede Udvalg ikke træffer afgørelse om en sag, som er fremlagt for det, i løbet af tre måneder, kan de kontraherende parter i en periode på højst seks måneder træffe hensigtsmæssige beskyttelsesforanstaltninger i henhold til denne aftales artikel 28 og 29.
In areas in which neither the competition rules nor the secondary legislation mentioned in Annex I to the proposed agreement confer power on the Community institutions, the States Parties are responsible for applying the provisions of the ECAA Agreement.
Efter denne periode kan hver enkelt kontraherende part opsige aftalen med øjeblikkelig virkning.
Dispute resolution and the task of ensuring uniform implementation of the provisions concerned are entrusted to the Joint Committee set up by Article 25 of the proposed agreement.