(EREFTER฀ B E M � R K E DES฀ DET฀ I฀DOMMEN฀ AT฀ FORSKELLENE฀ I฀ MEDLEMSSTATERNES฀ LOVGIVNINGER฀ VE D R � R E N DE฀ OFFENTLIGHED฀ FOR฀ S� ฀ VIDT฀ A N G� R ฀ FILIALER฀ KAN฀ FORSTYRRE฀ U D � VE L S EN฀ AF฀ E T A BL E R I N G S RETTEN฀ OG฀ AT฀ DEN฀ HARMONISERING฀ AF฀ OFFENTLIGHED฀ VE D R � R E N DE฀ FILIALER฀ DER฀ER฀ G E NN E MF � R Tfi฀ VED฀ E L L E V T E ฀ S E L S K A B S DIREKTIV฀ ER฀ U D T � M M E N DE฀ 3OM฀ F�L G E ฀ HERAF฀ VAR฀ E L L E V T E ฀ S E L S K A B S DIREKTIVS฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ TIL฀HINDER฀ FOR฀EN฀NEDERLANDSK฀ LOV฀ DER฀ P � LAGDE฀ EN฀ FILIAL฀AF฀ET฀ SELSKAB฀ SOM฀VAR฀ STIFTET฀ I฀HENHOLD฀ TIL฀EN฀ANDEN฀ MEDLEMSSTATS฀ NATIONALE฀ LOVGIVNING฀ OF FE N TL I G H E D S FORPLIGTELSER฀ DER฀ IKKE฀ F R E M GIK฀ AF฀ DIREKTIVET฀ $ISSE฀ OMFATTEDE฀ EN฀ FORPLIGTELSE฀
& OR฀ THE฀#OURT฀ THE฀ QUESTION฀ WHETHER฀ THE฀ FACTS฀ BEFORE฀ THE฀ REFERRING฀ COURT฀ ARE฀ CONSISTENT฀WITH฀ RESPECT฀ FOR฀ FUNDAMENTAL฀ RIGHTS฀ RAISES฀ THE฀ QUESTION฀OF฀ THE฀NEED฀ TO฀ RECONCILE฀ THE฀ REQUIREMENTS฀OF฀ THE฀PROTECTION฀ OF฀ FUNDAMENTAL฀ RIGHTS฀ IN฀ THE฀#OMMUNITY฀ WITH฀ THOSE฀ ARISING฀ FROM฀A฀ FUNDAMENTAL฀ FREEDOM฀ ENSHRINED฀ IN฀ THE฀4REATY฀ AND฀ MORE฀ PARTICULARLY฀ THE฀ QUESTION฀OF฀ THE฀ RESPECTIVE฀SCOPE฀OF฀ FREEDOM฀OF฀EXPRESSION฀AND฀ FREEDOM฀OF฀ASSEMBLY฀ AND฀ OF฀ THE฀ FREE฀MOVEMENT฀OF฀ GOODS฀ GIVEN฀ THAT฀ THEY฀ ARE฀ BOTH฀ SUBJECT฀ TO฀ RESTRICTIONS฀ JUSTIFIED฀BY฀PUBLIC฀ INTEREST฀ OBJECTIVES฀ )N฀ CONSIDERING฀WHETHER฀ THE฀ RESTRICTIONS฀ON฀ INTRA #OMMUNITY฀ TRADE฀ ARE฀ PROPORTIONATE฀ IN฀ THE฀ LIGHT฀OF฀ THE฀ OBJECTIVE฀ PURSUED฀ THAT฀ IS฀ THE฀PROTECTION฀ OF฀ FUNDAMENTAL฀ RIGHTS฀ THE฀#OURT฀ POINTS฀ OUT฀ DIFFERENCES฀ IN฀ THE฀ FACTS฀ OF฀ THIS฀CASE฀ 3 C H M I D B E R G E R ฀ AND฀ THOSE฀ OF฀#OMMISSION V฀ & RANCE฀ CITED฀ ABOVE฀ IN฀WHICH฀ THE฀#OURT฀HELD฀ THAT฀ & RANCE฀ HAD฀ FAILED฀ TO฀ FULFIL฀ ITS฀ OBLIGATIONS฀ UNDER฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀%#฀IN฀ CONJUNCTION฀WITH฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀%#฀AND฀ UNDER฀ THE฀ COMMON฀ O R G A N I S A T I ON S ฀ OF฀ THE฀ MARKETS฀ IN฀ AGRICULTURAL฀ PRODUCTS฀ BY฀ FAILING฀ TO฀ADOPT฀ALL฀NECESSARY฀AND฀PROPORTIONATE฀MEASURES฀ IN฀ORDER฀ TO฀PREVENT฀ THE฀ FREE฀MOVEMENT฀OF฀ FRUIT฀AND฀VEGETABLES฀ FROM฀BEING฀OBSTRUCTED฀BY฀ ACTIONS฀ BY฀ PRIVATE฀ INDIVIDUALS฀ SUCH฀AS฀ THE฀ INTERCEPTION฀ OF฀ LORRIES฀ TRANSPORTING฀ SUCH฀ PRODUCTS฀ AND฀ THE฀ DESTRUCTION฀ OF฀ THEIR฀ L O A D S ฀ VIOLENCE฀ AGAINST฀ LORRY฀ DRIVERS฀ AND฀ OTHER฀ T H RE A T S ฀ 4HE฀#OURT฀ FOUND฀ THAT฀ IN฀THE฀PRESENT฀ CASE฀ UNLIKE฀ IN฀ THE฀ CASE฀ JUST฀ CITED฀ THE฀ DEMONSTRATION฀ AT฀ ISSUE฀ TOOK฀ PLACE฀ FOLLOWING฀ AUTHORISATION฀ THE฀ OBSTACLE฀ TO฀ THE฀ FREE฀MOVEMENT฀OF฀ GOODS฀ RESULTING฀ FROM฀ THAT฀ DEMONSTRATION฀ WAS฀ LIMITED฀ THE฀ PURPOSE฀ OF฀ THAT฀ PUBLIC฀DEMONSTRATION฀WAS฀NOT฀ TO฀ RESTRICT฀ TRADE฀ IN฀GOODS฀OF฀A฀PARTICULAR฀ TYPE฀OR฀ FROM฀A฀PARTICULAR฀ S O U R C E ฀ VARIOUS฀ADMINISTRATIVE฀AND฀SUPPORTING฀MEASURES฀WERE฀ TAKEN฀BY฀ THE฀ COMPETENT฀AUTHORITIES฀ IN฀ORDER฀ TO฀ LIMIT฀AS฀ FAR฀AS฀POSSIBLE฀ THE฀DISRUPTION฀ TO฀ ROAD฀ T R A F F I C ฀ THE฀ISOLATED฀INCIDENT฀IN฀QUESTION฀DID฀NOT฀GIVE฀RISE฀TO฀A฀GENERAL฀CLIMATE฀OF฀INSECURITY฀SUCH฀ AS฀TO฀HAVE฀A฀DISSUASIVE฀EFFECT฀ON฀INTRA #OMMUNITY฀ TRADE฀ F L O W S ฀ AS฀A฀ WHOLE฀ AND฀ FINALLY฀ TAKING฀ ACCOUNT฀ OF฀ THE฀-EMBER฀3TATESg฀ WIDE฀ MARGIN฀ OF฀ DISCRETION฀ IN฀THE฀PRESENT฀ CASE฀ THE฀COMPETENT฀NATIONAL฀ AUTHORITIES฀ WERE฀ ENTITLED฀ TO฀ CONSIDER฀ THAT฀ AN฀ OUTRIGHT฀ BAN฀ ON฀ THE฀ DEMONSTRATION฀ AT฀ ISSUE฀ WOULD฀ HAVE฀ CONSTITUTED฀ UNACCEPTABLE฀ INTERFERENCE฀ WITH฀ THE฀ FUNDAMENTAL฀RIGHTS฀OF฀THE฀DEMONSTRATORS฀TO฀GATHER฀AND฀EXPRESS฀PEACEFULLY฀THEIR฀OPINION฀ 48