natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ADGANG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOKALER ..................................................................................................................................................................79BETALING AF SAGSOMKOSTNINGER ...........................................................................................................................................................................................80OPLYSNING PÅ FORSKELLIGE SPROG I VALGKAMPAGNE....................................................................................................................................................80 ....................................................................................................................................................80
ACCESS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT’S PREMISES ..........................................................................................................................................................79REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL COSTS ...............................................................................................................................................................................................80PROVISION OF INFORMATION IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES DURING AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN...........................................................................81 ...........................................................................81
OPSIGELSE AF CALLCENTER-OPERATØR .....................................................................................................................................................................................81PENSIONSRETTIGHEDER ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................82FRAVIGELSE AF ALDERSGRÆNSEN FOR ET PRAKTIKANTOPHOLD ..................................................................................................................................82FORSINKET BETALING TIL MARIE CURIE-STIPENDIAT............................................................................................................................................................83
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AS A “CALL CENTRE” OPERATOR .................................................................................................................................81PENSION ENTITLEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................82EXEMPTION FROM THE AGE LIMIT FOR A TRAINEESHIP ........................................................................................................................................................83LATE PAYMENT TO MARIE CURIE FELLOW.................................................................................................................................................................................83 .................................................................................................................................................................................83
FORSINKET BEVILLING AF AKTINDSIGT I ET DOKUMENT .....................................................................................................................................................84MANGLENDE SVAR PÅ ANMODNING OM OPLYSNINGER....................................................................................................................................................85 ....................................................................................................................................................85
DELAY IN PROVIDING ACCESS TO A DOCUMENT .....................................................................................................................................................................84FAILURE TO REPLY TO A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ..........................................................................................................................................................85
3.4.2 Rådet for Den Europæiske Union 86AKTINDSIGT I DOKUMENTER OM DEN FÆLLES UDENRIGS- OG SIKKERHEDSPOLITIK...............................................................................................86 ...............................................................................................86
3.4.2 The Council of the European Union 86ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS ON COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY....................................................................................................................86 ....................................................................................................................86
3.4.4 Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) 96MANGLENDE ANGIVELSE AF FORVENTET VARIGHED AF UNDERSØGELSE...................................................................................................................96 ...................................................................................................................96
3.4.4 The European Anti-Fraud OU ce (OLAF) 97LACK OF INDICATION BY OLAF OF LIKELY LENGTH OF INQUIRY......................................................................................................................................97 ......................................................................................................................................97
3.4.5 Den Europæiske Investeringsbank
3.4.5 The European Investment Bank
E-MAIL-KORRESPONDANCE MED EN ANSØGER TIL ET JOB..................................................................................................................................................97EIB’S BEHANDLING AF EN BEGÆRING OM AKTINDSIGT I OPLYSNINGER.......................................................................................................................98 .......................................................................................................................98
E-MAIL CORRESPONDENCE WITH AN APPLICANT FOR A JOB ..............................................................................................................................................97HANDLING OF A REQUEST FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION BY THE EIB...........................................................................................................................98 ...........................................................................................................................98
FORSLAG TIL HENSTILLINGER, DER ER GODKENDT AF INSTITUTIONEN
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS ACCEPTED BY THE INSTITUTION
ALDERSGRÆNSER I ET PRAKTIKPROGRAM ................................................................................................................................................................................98ANNULLERING AF EN FINANSIEL FORPLIGTELSE ....................................................................................................................................................................99UDVÆLGELSE AF ELEVER TIL EUROPASKOLERNE .................................................................................................................................................................100AKTINDSIGT I ET DOKUMENT FRA EN MEDLEMSSTAT I PROCEDUREN I FORBINDELSE MED UFORHOLDSMÆSSIGT STORE UNDERSKUD ......101
AGE LIMITS IN TRAINEESHIP PROGRAMME ...............................................................................................................................................................................99CANCELLATION OF A FINANCIAL COMMITMENT ...................................................................................................................................................................99SELECTION OF PUPILS FOR THE EUROPEAN SCHOOLS ........................................................................................................................................................100ACCESS TO A DOCUMENT ORIGINATING FROM A MEMBER STATE IN THE EXCESSIVE DEFICIT PROCEDURE...................................................101
3.5.2 Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) 101VILDLEDENDE OPLYSNINGER I PRESSEANALYSE..................................................................................................................................................................101 ..................................................................................................................................................................101
3.5.2 The European Anti-Fraud OU ce (OLAF) 102MISLEADING INFORMATION IN PRESS REVIEW......................................................................................................................................................................102 ......................................................................................................................................................................102
3.6 SAGER AFSLUTTET AF ANDRE GRUNDE 3.6.1 Europa-Kommissionen
3.6 CASES CLOSED FOR OTHER REASONS 3.6.1 The European Commission
ARTIKEL 226-KLAGE VEDRØRENDE OVERFØRSEL AF PENSION ........................................................................................................................................102ARTIKEL 226-KLAGE I EN SAG VED EN NATIONAL HØJESTERET ......................................................................................................................................103FRIT UDLÅN AF BØGER FRA OFFENTLIGE BIBLIOTEKER......................................................................................................................................................104 ......................................................................................................................................................104
ARTICLE 226 COMPLAINT CONCERNING PENSION TRANSFER ..........................................................................................................................................103ARTICLE 226 COMPLAINT IN A CASE PENDING BEFORE A NATIONAL SUPREME COURT .........................................................................................103FREE LENDING OF BOOKS FROM PUBLIC LIBRARIES.............................................................................................................................................................104 .............................................................................................................................................................104
SAGER AFSLUTTET EFTER EN SÆRLIG BERETNING
CASES CLOSED AFTER A SPECIAL REPORT
3.7.1 Rådet for Den Europæiske Union 104UNDLADELSE AF AT GIVE GYLDIGE GRUNDE TIL LOVGIVNINGSARBEJDE BAG LUKKEDE DØRE........................................................................104 ........................................................................104
3.7.1 The Council of the European Union 105FAILURE TO GIVE VALID REASONS FOR CONTINUING TO LEGISLATE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS...........................................................................105 ...........................................................................105
3.7.2 Europa-Kommissionen 105UNDERVISNINGSUDGIFTER FOR BØRN MED SÆRLIGE PÆDAGOGISKE BEHOV..........................................................................................................105 ..........................................................................................................105
3.7.2 The European Commission 105EDUCATIONAL COSTS FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS ............................................................................................................105
3.7.3 Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) 106AFGIVELSE AF UKORREKTE OG VILDLEDENDE OPLYSNINGER TIL OMBUDSMANDEN UNDER EN TIDLIGERE UNDERSØGELSE..............106
3.7.3 The European Anti-Fraud OU ce (OLAF) 106PROVISION OF INCORRECT AND MISLEADING INFORMATION TO THE OMBUDSMAN DURING A PREVIOUS INQUIRY...............................106 ...............................106
UNDERSØGELSE PÅ EGET INITIATIV FORETAGET AF OMBUDSMANDEN
OWN-INITIATIVE INQUIRY BY THE OMBUDSMAN
FORBINDELSER MED DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONSINSTITUTIONER OG ORGANER
RELATIONS WITH EUROPEAN UNIONINSTITUTIONS AND BODIES
DEN EUROPÆISKE TILSYNSFØRENDE FOR DATABESKYTTELSE
THE EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
DET EUROPÆISKE NETVÆRK AF OMBUDSMÆND
THE EUROPEAN NETWORK OF OMBUDSMEN
ANDRE OMBUDSMANDSSEMINARER OG -KONFERENCER
OTHER OMBUDSMAN SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES
ANDRE ARRANGEMENTER MED OMBUDSMÆND OG DERES PERSONALE
OTHER EVENTS WITH OMBUDSMEN AND THEIR STAFF
6.2 INFORMATIONSBESØG
6.2 INFORMATION VISITS
ANDRE KONFERENCER OG MØDER
OTHER CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS
VALG AF DEN EUROPÆISKE OMBUDSMAND
THE ELECTION OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
I 2005 kunne institutionen Den Europæiske Ombudsmand fejre tiårs jubilæum.
The institution of the European Ombudsman celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2005.
Denne vigtige milepæl var en oplagt lejlighed til at reflektere over de første ti års resultater og overveje, hvordan vi bedst kan videreudvikle forbindelserne til vore vigtigste samarbejdspartnere.
This important milestone gave us an opportunity to reflect on the achievements of the first ten years and to chart the optimal course of action for the future in cooperation with our key interlocutors.
De forskellige arrangementer i anledning af jubilæet gav os et udmærket indblik i, hvad der fungerer godt, og hvad der yderligere kan gøres for at udbygge samarbejdet både med Den Europæiske Unions institutioner og organer, med netværket af ombudsmænd og med klagerne og borgerne i almindelighed.
The range of events we organised provided us with rich insights into what was working well and what more could be done in terms of our relations with European Union (EU) institutions and bodies, the ombudsman community, and complainants and citizens more generally.
Inden jeg går mere i dybden med de forskellige ideer, det aTødte, vil jeg dog gerne dvæle lidt ved institutionens aktiviteter i denne tiårs periode.
But before going into depth on the various ideas that surfaced, let me first devote some thoughts to the work of the institution over the past ten years.
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand har siden september 1995 behandlet mere end 20 000 klager og hjulpet et endnu større antal borgere, som har henvendt sig til os for at få information.
Since September 1995, the European Ombudsman has handled over 20 000 complaints and helped countless more citizens by answering their requests for information.
Da min forgænger, Jacob SÖDERMAN, som var den første Europæiske Ombudsmand, forlod embedet, fremhævede han de forskellige europæiske institutioners og organers større villighed til at arbejde sammen med ham om at finde tilfredsstillende løsninger på borgernes klagesager.
Upon leaving oUce, my predecessor, the first European Ombudsman, Mr Jacob SÖDERMAN, could cite, as a major achievement, the degree to which the various EU institutions and bodies were willing to work with him to resolve citizens’ complaints.
På alle områder – lige fra af sk aT else af aldersgrænser ved ansæmelser til forbedringer med hensyn til forsinkede betalinger og fra øget aktindsigt til større respekt for EU-charteret om grundlæggende remigheder – har EU’s institutioner og organer vist, at de var interesseret i at samarbejde med Ombudsmanden om at sikre borgerne en bedre service. Disse – og mange andre – resultater kan vi som borgere i EU takke Jacob SÖDERMAN for.
From the abolition of age limits in recruitment to improvements in the area of late payment, and from greater access to documents to growing respect for the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the institutions and bodies demonstrated that they were keen to co-operate with the Ombudsman in improving service to citizens.
Ud over at forbedre EU’s forvaltning har institutionen Den Europæiske Ombudsmand gjort en ihærdig indsats for at udbygge forbindelserne til nationale, regionale og lokale ombudsmænd i hele EU for at sikre, at EU-borgernes remigheder, såvel som i EU bosiddende personers remigheder, bliver en realitet.
Beyond working to improve the Union’s administration, the institution of the European Ombudsman has made great eTorts to develop relations with national, regional and local ombudsmen throughout the Union with a view to ensuring that rights for citizens and residents under EU law, including fundamental rights, become a reality.
Dem e samarbejde foregår hovedsagelig inden for det europæiske netværk af ombudsmænd, som i løbet af det seneste tiår har udviklet sig til en uvurderlig mekanisme til hurtig og eTektiv behandling af klager fra borgerne.
This cooperation takes place, for the most part, under the aegis of the European Network of Ombudsmen, which has been built up over the past decade into an invaluable mechanism for dealing promptly and eT ectively with citizens’ complaints.
I 2005 fi k vi lejlighed til at gøre status over netværkets resultater siden opremelse i 1996 i Strasbourg og lægge os fast på, hvordan vi sammen når videre.
The year 2005 gave us the opportunity to take stock of the achievements of the Network since it was established in Strasbourg in 1996 and to determine how to move forward together.
Ombudsmanden har siden september 1995 arbejdet ihærdigt på at nå ud til borgerne for at gøre dem mere bevidste om deres remigheder, især remen til at klage og få administrative afgørelser prøvet.
The Ombudsman has worked tirelessly since September 1995 to reach out to citizens to raise awareness of their rights and in particular their right to complain and to seek redress.
At det i vist omfang er lykkedes, fremgår af den kendsgerning, at der nu indkommer over 300 klager til Ombudsmanden hver måned, og at vi i 2005 modtog det største antal klager nogensinde.
The success of these initiatives can be seen in the fact that over 300 complaints are now submimed to the Ombudsman every month, with the year 2005 seeing the highest ever number of complaints received.
Ombudsmandens forbindelser til EU’s institutioner og organer
The Ombudsman’s relations with EU institutions and bodies
Det ville selvfølge være langt bedre, at borgerne slet ikke havde behov for at henvende sig til Den Europæiske Ombudsmand, og at de involverede forvaltningsgrene selv fandt tilfredsstillende løsninger på klagesagerne på det tidligst mulige stadium.
It would of course be much bemer if citizens never needed to contact the European Ombudsman and if their complaints were resolved at the earliest possible stage by the administration implicated in the complaint.
Borgerne er ligeglade med, hvem der løser deres problemer.
Citizens do not mind who solves their problem.
OWe ønsker de blot en forklaring, en begrundelse, en undskyldning eller et godt råd, og den pågældende forvaltningsgren er bedst placeret til at levere det ønskede.
OWen they are simply looking for an explanation, a reason, an apology or advice, and the administration itself is best situated to provide this.
Hvis borgere føler behov for at klage, ønsker de problemet løst så hurtigt og eTektivt som muligt.
If citizens do feel the need to complain, they want the problem resolved as rapidly and eT ectively as possible.
EWer min opfamelse er en løsning, der foreslås af den involverede forvaltningsgren selv, hurtigere og i sidste ende mere tilfredsstillende for alle parter, fordi den derved får æren af at løse problemet, styrker sin legitimitet i klagerens øjne og sørger for, at alle ender op som vindere.
To my mind, a semlement proposed by the administration is quicker and ultimately more satisfying all round, since it credits the institution with solving the problem, increases its legitimacy in the eyes of the complainant and ensures a win-win outcome for all concerned.
Den måde, hvorpå en oTentlig forvaltning reagerer på klager, er med andre ord et vigtigt mål for, hvor meget den fokuserer på borgerne.
Put otherwise, the way in which the public administration reacts to complaints is a key measure of how citizen-focused it is.
Det er et vigtigt budskab, som jeg gerne ville bringe videre i forbindelse med de arrangementer, vi a[oldt sammen med EU’s institutioner og organer i vort jubilæumsår.
This is a key message that I aimed to communicate during the various events we organised with the EU institutions and bodies during our anniversary year.
Alle EU’s forskellige institutioner og organer kan medvirke til at forbedre forbindelserne til borgerne.
Each EU institution and body can play its part in improving relations with citizens.
Uanset om det drejer sig om problemer med en kontrakt, et ønske om aktindsigt eller en begrundelse for, hvorfor en ansøger blev forbigået, kan vi alle af klagesagerne lære noget om, hvordan vi yder borgerne en bedre service.
Whether it be tackling contractual problems, providing access to documents, or explaining why a candidate has not been selected, we can all learn about how to deliver bemer services from complaints.
Det endelige resultat af denne proces er, at alle, som på et eller andet tidspunkt er i kontakt med institutionerne – og det gælder ikke kun klagerne – har glæde af Ombudsmandens arbejde.
The final outcome of this process is that all those who may at some stage have contact with the institutions — not just those who complain — benefit from the Ombudsman’s work.
Klager er i mange tilfælde symptomer på mere alvorlige, komplekse eller systemiske problemstillinger.
Complaints are o W en symptoms of more serious, complex or systemic issues or problems.
En af Ombudsmandens funktioner er at afdække disse problemer og finde måder at løse dem på.
One of the Ombudsman’s functions is to identify these and to promote ways of tackling them.
Ud over at fungere som en ekstern kontrolmekanisme er Ombudsmanden således også en værdifuld ressource for cheferne i forvaltningen, fordi han kan hjælpe med til at forbedre forvaltningens ydeevne ved at gøre opmærksom på områder, hvor tingene kan gøres bedre.
As such, the Ombudsman, in addition to serving as an external mechanism of control, also constitutes a valuable resource to managers, a resource capable of helping the administration to bemer its performance by directing amention to areas for improvement.
Den europæiske kodeks for god forvaltningsskik er et uvurderligt hjælpemiddel i denne sammenhæng.
An invaluable instrument in this context is the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour.
Den blev vedtaget af Europa-Parlamentet i 2001, og den forklarer borgerne, hvad de har ret til at forvente af EU-forvaltningen.
Approved by the European Parliament in 2001, the Code explains to citizens what they have the right to expect from the European administration.
Den fungerer desuden som en nymig vejledning for oTentligt ansame ved at sæme de højeste standarder for oTentlig forvaltning.
It equally serves as a useful guide for civil servants, encouraging the highest standards of administration.
I 2005 udkom en ny udgave af kodeksen på 24 sprog.
A new edition of the Code was published in 24 languages in 2005.
Der blev distribueret mere end 100 000 eksemplarer både i og uden for Europa.
Over 100 000 copies were distributed throughout Europe and beyond.
Det resulterede i, at nationale og lokale forvaltninger, skoler og universiteter, uddannelsescentre, oTentlige biblioteker og privatpersoner anmodede om flere eksemplarer til yderligere distribution.
In response, national administrations and local authorities, schools and universities, training centres and public libraries, along with individual citizens, asked for copies for further distribution.
Det er virkelig en europæisk succeshistorie. Kodeksen er blevet tilpasset til brug for nationale, regionale og lokale forvaltninger fra Portugal til Italien, fra Vallonien til Grækenland og fra Rumænien til Kroatien.
This truly is a European success story.