natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En fransk statsborger indgav en klage mod et fransk regionalt sygesikringskontor over de vanskeligheder, han havde oplevet i forbindelse med hans krav om pensionsbetalinger.
A French citizen lodged a complaint against a French Regional Health Insurance Office relating to difficulties he had experienced with regard to his claims for pension payments.
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand kontaktede sin franske kollega for at sikre sig, at denne kunne tage sig af sagen.
The European Ombudsman contacted his French counterpart to ensure that he could deal with the matter.
Han kontaktede dernæst klageren, som accepterede, at hans klage blev oversendt til den franske ombudsmand.
He then contacted the complainant, who agreed for his complaint to be transferred to the French Ombudsman.
Denne undersøgte klagen og bekræftede, at klagerens pensionsbetalinger ville blive udbetalt til ham med tilbagevirkende kraft.1617/2008/CHM 
The latter investigated the complaint and confirmed that the complainant's pension payments would be paid to him with retrospective effect.1617/2008/CHM 
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand modtog klager fra bulgarske statsborgere mod energiselskaber (leverandører af centralvarme og varmt vand) i Bulgarien.
The European Ombudsman received complaints from Bulgarian citizens about energy companies (suppliers of central heating and warm water) in Bulgaria.
Eftersom klagerne gjorde gældende, at Fællesskabets lovgivning om energieffektivitet i slutanvendelserne og om energitjenester ikke var gennemført korrekt, rådede Ombudsmanden dem til at overveje at indgive en overtrædelsesklage til Kommissionen og underrettede Kommissionen om sagen.Den bulgarske ombudsmand havde modtaget hundredvis af lignende klager, der gik lige fra overtrædelse af forbrugerrettighederne til de metoder, der blev anvendt ved beregningen af de enkelte regninger.
Since the complainants alleged that Community law on energy end-use efficiency and energy services had not been properly transposed, the Ombudsman advised them to consider filing an infringement complaint with the Commission and informed the Commission about the matter.The Bulgarian Ombudsman had received hundreds of similar complaints, covering issues from violations of consumer rights to the methodology used for the calculation of individual bills.
Da de pågældende energiselskaber hører under den bulgarske ombudsmands mandat, undersøgte denne klagerne og udarbejdede en rapport med henstillinger til regeringen, specialiserede regeringskontorer, lokalforvaltningen og forsyningsvirksomhederne.
As the energy companies in question fall within his mandate, the Bulgarian Ombudsman investigated the complaints and issued a report with recommendations to the Government, specialized governmental agencies, the local administration and the utility companies.
Han underrettede efterfølgende Den Europæiske Ombudsmand om status på området, især vedrørende ændringer af den bulgarske lov om energieffektivitet.2349/2008/VIK og lignende sager 
He subsequently informed the European Ombudsman about developments in this area, most notably concerning changes to the Bulgarian law on energy efficiency.2349/2008/VIK and similar cases 
En spansk statsborger klagede til Den Europæiske Ombudsmand, på vegne af et politisk parti, over både spanske nationale og regionale myndigheders påståede overtrædelse af de grundlæggende rettigheder.
A Spanish national complained to the European Ombudsman, on behalf of a political party, about an alleged violation of fundamental rights by both Spanish national and regional authorities.
Han argumenterede, at de spanske myndigheder havde undladt at træffe alle de foranstaltninger, der var nødvendige for at sikre, at borgere, der lever i visse spanske regioner, og som har deres egne regionale sprog, er i stand til at udøve deres rettigheder, navnlig med hensyn til brugen af spansk i skoler og universiteter, og at sikre, at borgere ikke føler sig truet af terrororganisationen Eta.
He argued that the Spanish authorities had failed to take all necessary measures to ensure that citizens who live in certain Spanish regions which have their own regional languages are able to exercise their rights, in particular as regards the use of Spanish in schools and universities, and to ensure that citizens do not feel threatened by the terrorist organisation ETA.
Ombudsmanden oversendte disse sager til den spanske ombudsmand, der kunne iværksætte de nødvendige initiativer i forbindelse med disse påstande.Klageren argumenterede ligeledes, at Europa-Kommissionen havde undladt at træffe foranstaltninger over for de spanske myndigheder med henblik på at sikre overholdelse af disse rettigheder og frihedsrettigheder.
The Ombudsman transferred the case to the Spanish Ombudsman who could launch the necessary initiatives regarding these allegations.The complainant also argued that the European Commission had failed to take action against the Spanish authorities to ensure compliance with these rights and freedoms.
Eftersom han endnu ikke havde sat sig i forbindelse med institutionen for at informere den om sine bekymringer, rådede Den Europæiske Ombudsmand klageren til at indgive en klage til Kommissionen.3009/2007/SMG 
Since he had not yet contacted the institution to inform it about his concerns, the European Ombudsman advised the complainant to lodge a complaint with the Commission. 3009/2007/SMG 
En klager, der bor i Ungarn, indgav en klage til Den Europæiske Ombudsmand.
A complainant, who lives in Hungary, lodged a complaint with the European Ombudsman.
Klageren betaler hustrubidrag til sin ekskone, der bor i Frankrig.
The complainant pays alimony to his ex-wife who lives in France.
Han klagede over, at hustrubidraget i Ungarn ikke kan trækkes fra hans skattepligtige indkomst.
He complained about the fact that, in Hungary, the alimony is not deductible from his taxable income.
Ifølge klageren ville hustrubidraget være fradragsberettiget, såfremt han havde boet i Frankrig.
According to the complainant, if he lived in France, the alimony would be deductible.
Han var af den opfattelse, at EU burde gribe ind i denne sag.Ombudsmanden oversendte hans klage til Europa-Parlamentet til behandling som et andragende.
He considered that the EU should act concerning this matter.The Ombudsman transferred this complaint to the European Parliament to be dealt with as a petition.
Udvalget for Andragender begyndte at undersøge andragendet og anmodede Europa-Kommissionen om at gennemføres en forundersøgelse af de forskellige aspekter af problemet.2592/2007/LR 
The Committee on Petitions began to examine the petition, asking the European Commission to carry out a preliminary study into the different aspects of the problem.2592/2007/LR 
Oversendte klager til Europa-Kommissionen
Complaints transferred to the European Commission
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand modtog en klage fra den regionale ombudsmand i Andalusien i Spanien over oliespild som følge af en kollision mellem to skibe ud for kysten ved Cadiz og Gibraltar-området.
The European Ombudsman received a complaint from the Regional Ombudsman of Andalusia, Spain, concerning an oil spill caused by the collision of two ships near the coast of Cadiz and the Gibraltar area.
Ifølge klageren påvirkede oliespildet det nærtliggende område alvorligt, og de ansvarlige myndigheder havde undladt at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger.
According to the complainant, the oil spill was seriously affecting the nearby area and the responsible authorities had failed to take appropriate action.
Specifikt var det hans opfattelse, at situationen udgjorde en overtrædelse af fællesskabslovgivningen om miljøansvar.Eftersom sagen vedrørte en medlemsstats mulige overtrædelse af fællesskabslovgivningen, oversendte Ombudsmanden sagen til Kommissionen.
Specifically, he considered that the situation violated Community law on environmental liability.Since the case involved a potential infringement of Community law by a Member State, the Ombudsman transferred the case to the Commission.
Denne oplyste Ombudsmanden om, at den havde skrevet til den andalusiske ombudsmand og forklaret, at det relevante direktiv endnu ikke var gennemført af myndighederne i Gibraltar, og at den forfulgte dette aspekt af sagen gennem en overtrædelsesprocedure.
The latter informed the Ombudsman that it had written to the Andalusian Ombudsman and explained that the relevant Directive had not yet been transposed by the authorities of Gibraltar and that it was pursuing this aspect of the case through an infringement procedure.
Med hensyn til det specifikke problem, nævnte Kommissionen, at den havde anmodet Det Forenede Kongeriges myndigheder om at stille flere oplysninger til rådighed om karakteren af det materiale, der blev transporteret, og om, hvorvidt Det Forenede Kongeriges myndigheder havde levet op til deres forpligtelser i henhold til fællesskabsretten eller ej Den påtog sig at holde den andalusiske ombudsmand underrettet om det videre forløb i dens undersøgelse.2017/2008/JMA 
As regards the specific problem, the Commission mentioned that it had asked the United Kingdom authorities to provide further information about the nature of the material being transported and whether or not the United Kingdom authorities had complied with their obligations under Community law. It undertook to inform the Andalusian Ombudsman of any further developments in its inquiry.2017/2008/JMA 
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand modtog to klager om de problemer, som ægtefæller af EU-borgere var stødt på, da de havde brug for et visum for at komme ind i en anden medlemsstat.
The European Ombudsman received two complaints about problems encountered by the spouses of EU citizens who needed a visa to enter another Member State.
I den første sag blev en nigeriansk statsborger, der var gift med en rumænsk statsborger, bedt om et visum for at komme ind i Det Forenede Kongerige.
In the first case, a Nigerian national married to a Romanian national, was asked for a visa to enter the United Kingdom.
I den anden sag blev en thailandsk statsborger, der var gift med en statsborger i Det Forenede Kongerige, bedt om et visum for at komme ind i Spanien.
In the second case, a Thai national married to a United Kingdom citizen was asked for a visa to enter Spain.
Begge sager vedrørte mulige overtrædelser af fællesskabsretten om unionsborgeres og deres familiemedlemmers ret til at færdes og opholde sig frit på medlemsstaternes område.
Both cases concerned potential violations of Community law on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.
Ombudsmanden oversendte sagerne til Kommissionen.
The Ombudsman transferred the cases to the Commission.
Kommissionen kom med nyttige redegørelser i begge sager.
The Commission provided helpful explanations in both cases.
Specifikt med hensyn til den anden sag sagde Kommissionen, at Spanien kan have gennemført det relevante direktiv forkert.
Specifically with regard to the second case, it said that Spain may have wrongly transposed the relevant Directive.
Den underrettede klageren om, at de nærmere enkeltheder i hans sag ville blive taget op til overvejelse i dens samlede undersøgelse af, om de nationale lovgivninger overholder direktivet.
It informed the complainant that his case details would be taken into account in its overall examination of compliance of national legislation with the Directive.
Kommissionen rådede desuden klageren til at rette henvendelse til Solvit i Det Forenede Kongerige om hans klage, eller at indgive en formel klage til Kommissionen, såfremt problemet fortsat ikke er løst.2709/2008/EC og 2733/2008/EC 
The Commission further advised the complainant to contact SOLVIT United Kingdom concerning his complaint or to lodge a formal complaint with the Commission if the problem remains unresolved.2709/2008/EC and 2733/2008/EC 
Klage oversendt til S
Complaint transferred to S
En person klagede til Ombudsmanden med påstand om, at tjenestemandskommissionen i Cypern havde nægtet at anerkende de år, hun havde arbejdet i Det Forenede Kongerige, da den beregnede hendes alderspension, idet Cypern på det tidspunkt ikke var en EU-medlemsstat.
An individual complained to the Ombudsman alleging that the Civil Service Commission in Cyprus had refused to recognise the years she had worked in the United Kingdom when calculating her retirement pension because, at that time, Cyprus was not an EU Member State.
Klageren følte, at hun var udsat for forskelsbehandling, idet hun skulle arbejde længere end andre tjenestemænd for at trække sig tilbage med fuld pension.Klagen blev oversendt til Solvit, som kontaktede arbejds- og socialsikringsministeriet i Cypern.
The complainant felt she was being discriminated against, since she would have to work longer than other civil servants in order to retire with a full pension.The complaint was transferred to SOLVIT, which contacted the Ministry of Labour and Social Insurance in Cyprus.
Dette bekræftede, at der ikke burde være noget problem med at anerkende arbejdsperioden i Det Forenede Kongerige.
The latter confirmed that there should be no problem recognising the complainant's period of work in the United Kingdom.
Da klageren, i sine senere kontakter med Solvit, præciserede, at hendes klage var rettet mod tjenestemandskommissionen for ikke at have anerkendt hendes arbejdsperiode i Det Forenede Kongerige med henblik på forfremmelse, og at hun havde anlagt sag ved de nationale domstole, meddelte Solvit hende, at det ikke kunne behandle hendes specifikke klage.796/2008/TIS 
Since the complainant had, in her subsequent contacts with SOLVIT, clarified that her complaint was against the Public Service Commission for not recognising her work period in the United Kingdom for promotion purposes and that she had brought her case to the national courts, SOLVIT informed her that it could not deal with her specific complaint.796/2008/TIS 
Forbindelser med institutioner, ombudsmænd og andre interessenter en EUropæiske Ombudsmand bruger megen tid på at skabe opmærksomhed omkring
Relations with institutions, ombudsmen, and other stakeholders he European Ombudsman devotes considerable time to raising awareness about his work
D sit arbejde med at bekæmpe fejl og forsømmelser og fremme gennemsigtighed og god forvalt- ning.
T combating maladministration and promoting transparency and good administration. This
Dette kapitel giver et overblik over Ombudsmandens bestræbelser på at nå ud til EU’s institutioner og organer, til sine ombudsmandskolleger og til andre vigtige målgrupper.
Chapter provides an overview of the Ombudsman's efforts to reach out to the EU institutions and bodies, to his ombudsman colleagues, and to other key stakeholders.
Forbindelser med EU’s institutioner og organer
Relations with EU institutions and bodies
Et konstruktivt samarbejde med EU’s institutioner og organer er yderst vigtigt for Den Europæiske Ombudsmands mulighed for at opnå de bedst mulige resultater for klagerne. Ombudsmanden
Constructive relations with the EU institutions and bodies are hugely important for the European Ombudsman to help achieve the best possible results for complainants.
Et konstruktivt samarbejde med EU's institutionerog organer er yderst vigtigt for Den Europæiske Ombudsmands mulighed for at opnå de bedst mulige resultater for klagerne.
Constructive relations with the EU institutions and bodies are hugely important for the European Ombudsman to help achieve the best possible results for complainants.
Europa-Parlamentet vælger Ombudsmanden, og han rapporterer til Parlamentet, navnlig ved at fremlægge sin årsberetning samt gennem særlige beretninger.
The European Parliament elects the Ombudsman and he reports to it, most notably via the presentation of this Annual Report and also via special reports.
Ombudsmanden har et fremragende samarbejde med Parlamentets Udvalg for Andragender, som er ansvarligt for forbindelserne med Ombudsmanden, og som udarbejder en betænkning om hans årsberetning.
The Ombudsman enjoys an excellent working relationship with Parliament's Committee on Petitions, which is responsible for Parliament's relations with the Ombudsman and prepares a report on his Annual Report.
På udvalgets opfordring deltog der en repræsentant for Ombudsmanden på alle udvalgets møder i 2008.
At the Committee's request, the Ombudsman was represented by a member of his staff at each of the meetings held by the Committee in 2008.
På billedet ses Ombudsmanden, der fremlægger sin årsberetning for 2007 for Hans-Gert Pöttering, formand for Europa-Parlamentet, i Strasbourg, den 12. marts 2008.
The Ombudsman is pictured here presenting his Report 2007 to Mr Hans-Gert PÖTTERING, President of the European Parliament. Strasbourg, 12 March 2008.
Den 12. marts 2008 fremlagde Ombudsmanden sin årsberetning for 2007 for Parlamentets formand, Hans-Gert Pöttering, mep.
On 12 March 2008, the Ombudsman presented his Annual Report for 2007 to the President of Parliament, Mr Hans-Gert PÖTTeRING MeP.
Dagen efter forelagde han den for formanden for Udvalget for Andragender, Marcin Libicki, mep, og den 19. maj havde han lejlighed til at forelægge den for hele udvalget.
The following day, he delivered it to the President of the Committee on Petitions, Mr Marcin LIBICKI MeP, and, on 19 May, had the opportunity to present it to the Committee itself.
Dushana ZDravkova, mep, udarbejdede udvalgets betænkning om Ombudsmandens aktiviteter.
Ms Dushana ZDRAVKOVA MeP drafted the Committee's Report on the Ombuds-
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand — Årsberetning 2008 tilfredshed med Ombudsmandens arbejde, det konstruktive samarbejde med institutionerne samt med Ombudsmandens offentlige profil.Et andet vigtigt aspekt af Ombudsmandens forhold til Parlamentet i 2008 var revisionen af Den Europæiske Ombudsmands statut.
In its Resolution, Parliament declared its satisfaction with the Ombudsman's work, with his constructive co-operation with the institutions, and with his public profile.Also of importance in terms of the Ombudsman's relations with Parliament in 2008 was the revision of the European Ombudsman's Statute.
Ved udgangen af 2007 var Parlamentets Udvalg om Konstitutionelle Anliggender i færd med at behandle et udkast til betænkning om ændringsforslagene til statutten (ordfører: Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Mep).
At the end of 2007, Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs was considering a draft report on the proposed changes to the Statute (rapporteur Ms Anneli JÄÄTTeeNMÄKI MeP).
Den 24. januar 2008 forelagde P. Nikiforos DiamanDoUros igen sine forslag til ændring af statutten for udvalget, og den 10. marts blev Anneli Jäätteenmäkis betænkning vedtaget i udvalget med 19 stemmer for og ingen imod.
On 24 January 2008, Mr DIAMANDOUROS made a second presentation of his proposals to revise the Statute to that Committee, and on 10 March, Ms JÄÄTTeeNMÄKI's Report was adopted in Committee by 19 votes to 0.
Som beskrevet i årsberetningens kapitel 2 vedtog Parlamentet den 18. juni en afgørelse1 om ændring af statutten (576 stemmer for og otte imod).
As outlined in Chapter 2 of this Annual Report, Parliament adopted a decision1 revising the Statute on 18 June (by 576 votes to 8).
Den reviderede version af statutten trådte i kraft den 31. juli 2008.Den igangværende reform af forordning 1049/2001 om aktindsigt i dokumenter2 var også på Ombudsmandens interinstitutionelle dagsorden i 2008.
The revised version of the Statute entered into force on 31 July 2008.The ongoing reform of Regulation 1049/2001 on public access to documents2 also featured on the Ombudsman's interinstitutional agenda in 2008.
Ombudsmandens synspunkter om Kommissionens forslag til ændring af denne forordning blev forelagt Parlamentets Udvalg om Borgernes Rettigheder og Retlige og Indre Anliggender på et møde i Bruxelles den 2. juni og igen den 11. december på et seminar i Bruxelles arrangeret af det finske parlament og justitsministerium.
The Ombudsman's views on the Commission's proposal to revise this Regulation were presented to Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs at a meeting in Brussels on 2 June, and again, on 11 December, at a seminar in Brussels organised by the Parliament of Finland and the Ministry of Justice of Finland.
Ombudsmanden tilskyndede Europa-Parlamentet til at udnytte sin rolle som medlovgiver for denne forordning med henblik på at sikre borgerne den bedst mulige aktindsigt.
The Ombudsman encouraged the European Parliament to use its role as co-legislator on this Regulation to ensure the widest possible access to documents for citizens.
Som en del af sit bidrag til debatten om dette spørgsmål gennemførte Ombudsmanden en sammenlignende undersøgelse af lovgivningen og praksis i medlemsstaterne vedrørende aktindsigt i databaser.
As part of his contribution to the debate on this issue, the Ombudsman conducted a comparative study on the law and practice in the Member States relating to public access to information in databases.
Med udgangspunkt i denne undersøgelse fremsatte han konkrete forslag til ændring af reglerne om aktindsigt.
He took inspiration from the study to make concrete proposals in relation to the reform of the access to documents rules.
Revisionen af Ombudsmandens statut stod højt på dagsordenen for de fleste møder, som P. Nikiforos DiamanDoUros holdt med repræsentanter for medlemsstaterne i Rådet i første halvdel af 2008.
The revision of the Ombudsman's Statute featured high on the agenda of most meetings that Mr DIAMANDOUROS held with representatives of the Member States in the Council in the first half of 2008.
Den 16. maj holdt Ombudsmanden et indlæg for Rådet (almindelige anliggender), hvor han gjorde rede for formålet med at ændre statutten og besvarede spørgsmål fra medlemsstaternes delegationer.
On 16 May, the Ombudsman made a presentation to the General Affairs Group of the Council to explain the purpose of the Statute revision and to answer any questions from the Member State delegations.
Rådet gav sin tilslutning til den reviderede statut i en erklæring fra Janez Lenarčič, Rådets formand, på Parlamentets plenarmøde den 18. juni.
The Council indicated its approval of the revised Statute in a statement by Mr Janez LeNARČIČ, President-in-office of the Council, at Parliament's plenary session on 18 June.
Eftersom Kommissionen er den institution, der tegner sig for den højeste andel af Ombudsmandens undersøgelser, er regelmæssige møder med kommissærerne og højtstående tjenestemænd
The European Commission is the institution accounting for the highest proportion of inquiries carried out by the Ombudsman. Regular meetings with Commissioners and senior staff are there-
Europa-Kommissionen er den institution,der tegner sig for den højeste andel af Ombudsmandens undersøgelser.
The European Commission is the institution accounting for the highest proportion of inquiries carried out by the Ombudsman.
vigtige for at sikre et konstruktivt samarbejde og tilfredsstillende svar på Ombudsmandens undersøgelser.
fore important to ensure constructive working relations and satisfactory responses to the Ombudsman's inquiries.
I løbet af 2008 mødtes P. Nikiforos DiamanDoUros med Kommissionens formand, José
During 2008, Mr DIAMANDOUROS met with Commission President José Manuel
Manuel Barroso, Kommissionens næstformand med ansvar for institutionelle forbindelser og kommunikation, Margot Wallström, kommissæren for videnskab og forskning, Janez Potočnik, og kommissæren for beskæftigelse, sociale anliggender og ligestilling, Vladimír ŠpiDla. For at sikre den bedst mulige service for klagerne samarbejder Ombudsmanden tæt med andre klageordninger, herunder dem, som Kommissionen koordinerer.
BARROSO, Commission Vice-President responsible for Institutional Relations and Communication, Ms Margot WALLSTRÖM, Commissioner for Science and Research, Mr Janez POTOČNIK, and Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Mr Vladimír ŠPIDLA.With a view to ensuring the best possible service to complainants, the Ombudsman co-oper-ates closely with other redress mechanisms, including those co-ordinated by the Commission.
Den 20. november præsenterede P.Nikiforos DiamanDoUros sit arbejde for Solvit -netværket ved en workshop i Luxembourg.
On 20 November, Mr DIAMANDOUROS presented his work to the SOLVIT Network at a workshop in Luxembourg.