natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
NALOO har kritiseret Kommissionen for ikke at have draget de korrekte konklusioner af de beviser, den havde fremlagt, og for med urette at have afvist den af sammenslutningen foreslåede metode til beregning af en rimelig royalty.
By applications lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 20 and 23 April 2001, International Power pic (formerly National Power pic; 'IP') in Case C-172/01 P, British Coal Corporation ('BC') in Case C-175/01 P, PowerGen (UK) pic (formerly PowerGen pic; 'PG') in Case C-176/01 P, and the Commission of the European Communities in Case C-180/01 P, each brought an appeal pursuant to Article 49 of the ECSC Statute of the Court of Justice against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance on 7 February 2001 in Case T89/98 NALOO ν Commission [2001] ('the judgment under appeal'), by which the Court of First Instance annulled Commission Decision IV/E-3/NALOO of 27 April 1998 ('the 1998 Decision').
Det fremgår af denne doms præmis 147-163, at 1998beslutningen ikke indeholder nogen urigtig retsanvendelse eller noget urigtigt skøn.
By that decision, the Commission rejected a complaint lodged on 15 June 1994 by the National Association of Licensed Opencast Operators ('NALOO').
Med sit søgsmål har NALOO gjort gældende, at Kommissionen ikke var berettiget til at udstede en beslutning om at afvise 1994-klagen med den begrundelse, at sammenslutningen ikke havde fremlagt tilstrækkelige beviser.
Grounds of appeal concerning the applicability of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty to the royalties for coal extraction
Af disse grunde må anbringendet, der bygger på NALOO's berettigede forventning, forkastes.
BC submits that the Court of First Instance erred in law in failing to hold that Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty was not applicable to the royalties for coal extraction.
Anbringendet, der bygger på, at EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 finder anvendelse på royalties for udvinding af kul
Articles 65 and 66(7) of that treaty have quite distinct objects, just as Articles 81 and 82 EC do.
NALOO har også gjort gældende, at fastsættelsen af urimelige royalties for udvinding af kul i henhold til licensaftalerne mellem BC og producenter i henhold til licens omfattes af anvendelsesområdet for EKSF-traktatens artikel 65.
In that regard, it must be held that, although it stated that it was not necessary to settle the question of the applicability of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty to the royalties for coal extraction, the Court of First Instance annulled the 1998 Decision in its entirety.
Det er i forbindelse hermed tilstrækkeligt at fastslå, at det fremgår af undersøgelsen af de andre anbringender i sagen, at det var med rette, at Kommissionen afviste den del af 1994-klagen, der vedrørte den urimelige karakter af disse royalties, idet den subsidiært fandt, at NALOO ikke havde fremlagt tilstrækkelige beviser.
However, in the judgment under appeal, the Court of First Instance did not give any reason for its view that the Commission's conclusion in regard to the applicability of that provision was incorrect.
Under disse omstændigheder er der ikke grund til at undersøge spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 kunne have været anvendt på de nævnte royalties.
The appeals are thus well founded in so far as they complain that the Court of First Instance annulled the 1998 Decision in its entirety without examining the question whether Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty was applicable to the royalties for coal extraction.
den del af denne beslutning, hvori Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber afviste klagen vedrørende størrelsen af de royalties, der anvendtes på udvinding af kul forud f or den 1. april 1990.
In accordance with the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 61 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, if the Court sets aside the decision of the Court of First Instance, it may itself give final judgment in the matter, where the state of the proceedings so permits.
3) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes for det afNational Association of Licensed Opencast Openttors (NALOO) anlagte søgsmål, for så vidt som der er nedlagtpåstand onv annullation af den del af beslutning IV/E-3/NALOO, hvori Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber fandt, at EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 ikke var anvendelig på fastsættelsen af royalties for udvinding af kul
NALOO claims that the Commission did not draw the correct conclusions from the evidence supplied by NALOO and was wrong to reject the method proposed by it for calculating a fair royalty.
— annullation af den del af denne beslutning hvori Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber afviste klagen vedrørende størrelsen af de royalties, der anvendtes på udvinding af kul forud for den 1. april 1990.
It follows from paragraphs 147 to 163 of this judgment that the 1998 Decision does not contain any errors of law or of assessment in that respect.
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber bærer sine egne omkostninger.
In its application, NALOO submits that the Commission was not entitled to adopt a decision rejecting the 1994 complaint on the ground that NALOO had not provided sufficient evidence.
5) I sag C-l75/01 Ρ bærer NALOO sine egne omkostninger vedrørende sagens behandling for Domstolen samt betaler British Coal Corporations og Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskabers omkostninger i denne sag.
The Commission cannot, without unduly compromising the legal certainty of the undertakings whose conduct is the subject of a complaint, indefinitely extend the period granted to a complainant for the purpose of providing evidence to substantiate its complaints.
6) I sag C-l76/01 Ρ bærer Power Gen (UK) plc sine egne omkostninger vedrørende sagens behandling for Domstolen samt betaler NALOO's omkostninger i denne sag Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber bærer sine egne omkostninger.
For those reasons, the plea relating to NALOO's legitimate expectations must be rejected.
7) I sag C-180/01 Ρ bærer parterne deres egne omkostninger vedrørende sagens behandling for Domstolen
The plea concerning the applicability of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty to the royalties for coal extraction
8) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber og NALOO bærer deres egne omkostninger vedrørende sagens behandling for Retten.
NALOO also submits that the setting of excessively high royalties for coal extraction in the licence agreements entered into between BC and the licensed producers comes within the scope of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty.
International Power plc, British Coal Corporation og Power Gen (UK) plc bærer hver de omkostninger, de har afholdt som intervenienter i sagen for Retten.*
In that regard, it need only be noted that it is clear from the examination of the other pleas raised in the application that the Commission was entitled to reject the part of the 1994 complaint relating to the excessively high level of those royalties, in finding, in the alternative, that NALOO had not provided it with sufficient evidence.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 8. maj 2003.
In those circumstances, there is no need to examine the question whether Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty was applicable to those royalties.
Ved kendelse af 11. juni 2001 har Politierechtbank te Mechelen (kriminalret i Mechelen) forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 10 EF og 39 EF.
Dismisses the application of the National Association of Licensed Opencast Operators (NALOO) in so far as it seeks: annulment of the part of Decision IV/E-3/NALOO in which the Commission of the European Communities held that Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty was not applicable to the setting of royalties for coal extraction; annulment of the part ofthat decision in which the Commission of the European Communities rejected the complaint relating to the level of the royalties charged for coal extraction before 1 April 1990;
Hans van Lent er belgisk statsborger med bopæl i Putte kommune (Belgien).
In Case C-172/01 P, orders International Power pic to pay its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of Justice and those incurred by NALOO in these proceedings.
Ved en færdselskontrol i Willebroek (Belgien) søndag den 22. august 1999 blev det konstateret, at Hans van Lent førte en personbil med en luxembourgsk nummerplade.
In Case C-175/01 P, orders NALOO to pay its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of Justice and those incurred by British Coal Corporation and the Commission of the European Communities in these proceedings;
Hans van Lent forklarede, at han arbejdede som civilingeniør hos EDS SA (herefter »EDS«), Bascharage (Luxembourg), som havde stillet leasingkøretøjet til hans rådighed, uden at han skulle betale godtgørelse eller leje for brug af dette.
In Case C-176/01 P, orders PowerGen (UK) pic to pay its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of Justice and those incurred by NALOO in these proceedings.
EDS havde også et kontor i Antwerpen (Belgien).
The Commission of the European Communities is to pay its own costs;
Under et retsmøde i Politierechtbank te Mechelen den 18. september 2000 forklarede Hans van Lent, at han udelukkende arbejdede for EDS SA i Luxembourg, men deltog i visse møder i Antwerpen.
Orders the Commission of the European Communities and NALOO each to pay their own costs in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.
Han forklarede endvidere, at han ligeledes brugte køretøjet til private formål, idet han anvendte det til kørsel til sit hjem og i weekenderne.
International Power pic, British Coal Corporation and PowerGen (UK) pic are each to pay their own costs as interveners in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.'
Van Lent har for Retten gjort gældende, at artikel 3, stk. 1, i kongelig anordning af 31. december 1953 er i strid med »fællesskabsretten og navnlig det i Rom-traktaten sikrede princip om arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed«.
'(1) Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 7 February 2001 in Case T-89/98,
Da Politierechtbank te Mechelen er af den opfattelse, at tvisten således rejser spørgsmål om fortolkning af fællesskabsretten, har retten besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen et præjudicielt spørgsmål.
— in so far as in that judgment, the Court of First Instance declines to examine the applicability of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty to the fixing of royalties for coal extraction, and in so far as that judgment annuls the part of Commission Decision IV/E-3/NALOO of 27 April 1998 by which the Commission rejects the complaint relating to the level of royalty charged for coal extraction in the years 1986/87 to 1989/90.
Det præjudicielle spørgsmål
(2) For the rest, dismiss the appeals.
I denne sag fremgår det for det første, at artikel 3 i kongelig anordning af 31. december 1953 under omstændigheder som de foreliggende forbyder kørsel i Belgien med et køretøj indregistreret i en anden medlemsstat.
— in so far as NALOO claims that the Commission ought to have applied Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty to the fixing of royalties for coal extraction, and in so far as NALOO seeks annulment of the part of Commission Decision IV/E-3/NALOO of 27 April 1998 by which the Commission rejects the complaint relating to the level of royalty charged for coal extraction in the years 1986/87 to 1989/90.
Sådanne bestemmelser kan medføre, at en i en medlemsstat etableret arbejdsgiver afstår fra at ansætte en arbejdstager bosat i en anden medlemsstat på grund af højere omkostninger og administrative vanskeligheder i forbindelse med en sådan ansættelse.
(5) In Case C-175/01 P, order NALOO to pay its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of Justice and those incurred by the British Coal Corporation and the Commission in these proceedings.
Under disse omstændigheder må det undersøges, om den begrænsning, der følger af de nationale bestemmelser, kan være berettiget.
(7) In Case C-180/01 P, order each party to pay its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of Justice.
I den forbindelse må det blot konstateres, at eftersom køretøjet ikke kan indregistreres i Belgien, kan formålene med indregistreringspligten ikke opnås.
(8) Order the Commission and NALOO each to pay their own costs in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.
Heraf følger, at begrænsningen af arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed ikke kan være berettiget.
International Power pic, PowerGen (UK) pic and the British Coal Corporation are each to pay their own costs as interveners in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.'
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Case C-232/01 Hans van Lent Freedom of movement for persons
»Artikel 39 EF er til hinder for nationale bestemmelser i en medlemsstat som de i denne sag foreliggende, hvorefter en i medlemsstaten bosat arbejdstagerforbydes på dennes område at benytte et i en nabomedlemsstat indregistreret motorkøretøj, som tilhører et i denne nabomedlemsstat etableret leasingselskab, og som stilles til rådighed for arbejdstageren af dennes arbejdsgiver, der ligeledes er etableret i nabomedlemsstaten*
Preliminary ruling (Freedom of movement for workers — Vehicle leasing — Obligation to register vehicle in worker's Member State of residence) (Fifth Chamber)
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling') den 5. december 2002.
By order of 11 June 2001 the Politierechtbank te Mechelen (Local Criminal Court, Mechelen) (Belgium) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 10 EC and 39 EC.
Han foreslog Domstolen at svare således:
Mr Van Lent is a Belgian national residing in Putte (Belgium).
Sag C-322/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Nederlandene Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
During a traffic check in Willebroek (Belgium) on Sunday 22 August 1999, it was found that Mr Van Lent was driving a motor vehicle with a Luxembourg registration plate.
»Traktatbrud — direktiv 91/676/EØF - beskyttelse af vand mod forurening forårsaget af nitrater, der stammer fra landbruget — artikel 5, stk 4 og 5, og bilag ΙΙ,Α,Ι), 2), 4) og 6), samt bilag III, nr. 1, 2) og 3), og nr. 2 - kapacitet i anlæg til opbevaring af husdyrgødning — begrænsning af tilførsel af gødning på grundlag af ligevægt mellem afgrødens forventede kvælstofbehov og kvælstoftilførslen til afgrøden fra jorden og fra gødning — sikkerhed for at den mængde husdyrgødning som tilføres jorden hvert år, ikke overstiger en vis mængde pr. hektar — bestemmelser i kodeksen for godt landmandskab om perioder, betingelser og fremgangsmåder f or tilførsel af gødning —forpligtelse til at træffe alle nødvendige supplerende eller skærpede foranstaltninger* (Sjette Afdeling)
The Crown Prosecutor served a summons on Mr Van Lent for having taken on the public highway a motor vehicle which had not been registered in Belgium in the name of its owner, in breach of Article 3(1) of the Royal Decree of 31 December 1953 governing the registration of motor vehicles and trailers.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 30. august 2000 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af artikel 226 EF anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Kongeriget Nederlandene har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 91/676/EØF af 12. december 1991, idet det ikke har sat de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft, som er omhandlet i direktivets artikel 4, artikel 5, stk. 4 og 5, og bilag ΙΙ,Α,Ι), 2), 4) og 6), samt i bilag III, nr. 1, 2) og 3), og nr. 2.
During the hearing on 18 September 2000 before the Politierechtbank te Mechelen Mr Van Lent stated that he worked exclusively for EDS in Luxembourg, but that he attended meetings in Anvers. He stated, further, that he also used the vehicle for private purposes to go home at the weekend.
Kommissionen har med sit første anbringende kritiseret Kongeriget Nederlandene for ikke i sit handlingsprogram at have medtaget bindende regler, hvorefter kapaciteten for anlæg til opbevaring af husdyrgødning i hver bedrift eller husdyrbrug fastsættes til et niveau, der overstiger den påkrævede opbevaringskapacitet i den længste periode, hvor der i Nederlandene er forbud mod tilførsel til jorden.
Taking the view that the dispute did indeed raise a question concerning the interpretation of Community law, the Politierechtbank te Mechelen decided to stay the proceedings and referred a question to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Herved er det uden betydning, at opbevaringskapaciteten på nationalt eller regionalt plan eller inden for sektoren samlet set synes tilstrækkelig, da det kun er opbevaringskapaciteten i den enkelte bedrift, der er afgørende.
By its question, the national court asks, essentially, whether Article 39 EC precludes national rules of a Member State which prohibit a worker who is domiciled in that Member State from using on its territory a vehicle registered in another neighbouring Member State, belonging to a leasing company established in that second Member State and made available to the worker by his employer who is also established in the second Member State.
Den nederlandske regerings opfattelse, hvorefter direktivet ikke forpligter medlemsstaterne til at vedtage bindende bestemmelser for at opfylde kravene i henhold til direktivets bilag III, nr. 1,2), kan ikke tiltrædes.
In the present case it appears, first, that Article 3 of the Royal Decree of 31 December 1953 prohibits a vehicle registered in another Member State from being driven in Belgium in circumstances such as those in this case.
Ordninger på delområder kan ikke opfylde den forpligtelse, der påhviler en medlemsstat, til at udarbejde et handlingsprogram, der omfatter bindende foranstaltninger, med henblik på at nå direktivets specifikke mål.
Second, it does indeed appear to follow from Articles 3 and 4 of the Royal Decree of 31 December 1953 that the worker, Mr Van Lent, could not register the vehicle in Belgium because he is not the owner and that th ¿ owner, the leasing company, could not register it either because it is not established in Belgium and does not have a Belgian VAT number as is required for registration of the vehicle.
Da den bekendtgørelse, som den nederlandske regering har bebudet, ikke var blevet vedtaget inden udløbet af fristen i den begrundede udtalelse, er det ufornødent at tage stilling til, hvorvidt bekendtgørelsen eventuelt udgør en gyldig opfyldelse af forpligtelserne i henhold til bilag III, nr. 1, 2), til direktivet.
Such rules could discourage an employer based in one Member State from engaging a worker residing in another Member State because of the higher costs and administrative difficulties involved.
afgrødens forventede kvælstofbehov på den ene side og kvælstoftilførslen til afgrøden fra jorden og fra gødning på den anden side.
In that regard, it is sufficient to observe that, since the vehicle cannot be registered in Belgium, the objectives of the obligation to register cannot be achieved.
•1) Kongeriget Nederlandene har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 91/676/EØF af 12. december 1991 om beskyttelse afvand mod forurening forårsaget af nitrater, der stammer fra landbruget, idet det ikke har sat de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft, som er omhandlet i direktivets artikel 5, stk 4, litra a), sammenholdt med bilag III, nr. 1, 2) og 3), ognr.2 samme direktivs artikel 5, stk 4, litra b), sammenholdt med artikel 4, stk 1, litra a), og med bilag ΙΙ^Α,Ι), 2), 4) og 6)
'Article 39 EC precludes national rules of a Member State, such as those in die present case, which prohibit a worker who is domiciled in that Member State from using on its territory a vehicle registered in another neighbouring Member State, belonging to a leasing company established in that second Member State, and made available to the worker by his employer who is also established in the second Member State.'
— nævnte direktivs artikel 5, stk 5.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 5 December 2002.
Kongeriget Nederlandene betaler sagens omkostninger.*
He proposed that the Court should answer as follows:
Sag C-320/03 R Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Republikken Østrig Transport
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 30 August 2OO0, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 226 EC for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the necessary legislative and administrative provisions laid down in Article 4 and Article 5(4) and (5) of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 and in paragraphs A(l), (2), (4) and (6) of Annex II and paragraph 1(2) and (3) and paragraph 2 of Annex III thereto, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive.
»Særlige rettergangsformer — begæring om foreløbige forholdsregler — transport —forbud mod kørsel på delstrækning*
It is irrelevant that the storage capacity at national, regional or sectoral level appears to be sufficient in the aggregate, since only the storage capacity on each farm matters.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The Netherlands Government's argument that the Directive does not require Member States to adopt binding rules in order to comply with the obligations flowing from paragraph 1(2) of Annex III to the Directive cannot be accepted.
Sag C-418/01 IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG / NDC Health GmbH & Co. KG Præjudiciel — Landgericht Frankfurt am Main —fortolkning af artikel 82 EF i forhold til en afvisning af at give en licens til at udnytte (en del af) en database vedrørende det tyske marked for farmaceutiske produkter — ophavsret til en opdeling af det område, som disse data vedrører
Article 5(4)(a) of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, in conjunction with paragraph 1(2) and (3) and paragraph 2 of Annex III thereto;
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.'
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
(2) dismiss the Commission's claim for a declaration that the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligation arising from Article 5(4)(b) in conjunction with Article 4(1 )(a) and with paragraph 2 of part A of Annex II to the same directive, on the ground that it has failed to include in its action programme rules covering the conditions for the application of fertilizer to steeply sloping ground, and
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
(3) order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.'
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
Case C-320/03 R Commission of the European Communities ν Republic of Austria Transport
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 13.1.2004 Katalognr.: QD-AC-03-026-DA-C
Not available in English at time of publication.
Ugen 13. - 17. oktober 2003
Week of 13 to 17 October 2003 n° 27/03
Sag C-489/01
Case C-489/01
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland Etableringsfrihed
Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Freedom of establishment
Sag C-32/02 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik Socialpolitik
Case C-32/02 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic Social policy
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik Industripolitik
Case C-307/02 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic Industrial policy
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
Case C-325/02 Commission of the European Communities ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg Environment and consumers
Sag C-388/02 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Irland Fri bevægelighed for personer
Case C-388/02 Commission of the European Communities ν Ireland Freedom of movement for persons