natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En sädan ordning kan derfor ikke anses for at vrere berettiget i henhold til direktiv 761207 , idet udvelgelsen af en anssgerblandt dem, der er tilstrrekkeligt kvalificerede, i sidste instans alene sker pä grundlag af, om den pägreldende tilhsrer det underrepresenterede ksn, selvhvis den valgte anssger er mindre kvalificeret end en anssger af det modsatteksn.
In the case inpoint, the owners of land to be acquired compulsorily, pursuant to an act ofnational legislation, for construction of a motorway link contested before thenationalcourt the legality of the compulsory purchase procedure on the basis thatit did not comply with Directive 851337 .
En sädan lovgivning er heller ikke berettiget i medfsr af artikel l4I,stk. 4, EF, idet den omhandlede udvelgelsesmetode under alle omstendighederikke stär i et rimeligt forhold til det formäI, der forfolges.
The Court of Justice held that theconceptof a specific act of national legislation used in the directive must be givenan autonomous interpretation because of requirements relating to the uniformapplication of Community law and the principle of equality.
Det forhold, atanvendelsesomrädet for en positiv serbehandlingsforanstaltningsom den isagen omhandledebegrrenses, betyder ikke, at den ophorer med at v & re enubetinget og uforholdsmessig foranstaltning, hvorfor de ovennrevntebestemmelser ligeledes er til hinder for en sädan national lovgivning, hvislovgivningen kun finder anvendelse pä besrettelse af et pä forhänd bestemt,begrrenset antal stillinger.
A measure adoptedby a parliament after public parliamentary debateconstitutes such an act wherethe legislative process has enabledthe objectives pursued by Directive 851337,including that of supplying information, to be achieved, and the informationavailable to the parliament at the time when the details of the project wereadopted was equivalent to that which would have been submitted to the competentauthority in an ordinary procedure for granting consent for a project.
Endelig lader frellesskabsretten pä ingen mädeanvendelsen af princippet om ligebehandling af mrend og kvinder for sä vidtangär adgang til beskaeftigelse aftrengeaf, om den stilling, der skal besrettes,er pä et hojere eller lavereniveau. niveau.
Thenationalcourt may review whether the national legislature kept within the limits of the discretion set by Directive 85/337, in particular where prior assessment ofthe environmentalimpact of the project has not been carried out, the information to be provided as a minimum by the developer has not been made available to thepublic and the members of the public concerned have not had an opportunity toexpress an opinion before the project is initiated, contrary to the requirements ofthe directive.
Domstolen fastslog, at envrernetingsklausul, der uden at have vrret genstand for individuel forhandlinger indsat i en kontrakt, som er indgäet mellem en forbruger og enerhvervsdrivende, og hvorved en enekompetencetillregges retten i denretskreds, hvor den erhvervsdrivendes hjemsted er beliggende,mä anses forurimelig i direktivets forstand, i det ornfang den til trods for kravet om god trobevirker en betydelig skrevhed i parternes rettigheder og forpligtelser ifolgeaftalen til skade for forbrugeren.Den beskyttelse,som direktiv 92113 giverforbrugerne, indeberer,at den nationale domstol ex officio kan tage stillingtil, om et vilkär i en kontrakt, der er forelagt den, er urimeligt, när den proversporgsmälet om antagelse af en sag til realitetsbehandling ved de nationaledomstole.
In order to produce a draft list ofsites of Community importance, capable of leadingto the creation of a coherent European ecological net work of special areas of conservation,the Commissionmust have available an exhaustive list of the sites which, at national level, havean ecological interest which is relevant from the point of view of the directive'sobjective of conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora. Only inthat way is it possible to realise the objective, referred to in the directive, ofmaintaining or restoring the natural habitat types and the species' habitatsconcerned at a favourable conservation status in their natural range.
Den nationale domstol er ved anvendelsen af nationaleretsforskrifter, hvad enten de er aeldre eller yngre end direktiv 93113, forpligtettil i videst muligt omfang at fortolke dem i lyset af direktivets ordlyd og formäI. Kravet om en fortolkning i overensstemmelse med direktivetforudsretter bl.a., at den nationale domstol vrelgerden fortolkning, som vilgsre det muligt for den ex officio at afuise at udeiveen kompetence, som er tillagt den i medfsr af et urimeligt kontraktvilkär.
That rangemay lie across one or more frontiers insidethe Community and a Member Stateis not in a position to have precise detailed knowledge of the situation of habitatsin the other Member States.
I lsbet af det forlsbne är har Domstolen haft rig tejlighedtil at afgoresager pä omrädet for miljobeslryttelse. Sagerne vedrsrte bäde de omräder somfarligt affald, beskyttelse af vilde fugle eller vurdering af visse offentlige ellerprivate projekters indflydelse pä miljoet, der er blevet traditionelle, men ogsänye omräder som markedsfsring af genetisk modificeredeorganismer (GMO).
So far as concerns interpretation of the Brussels Convention (Conventionof 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civiland Commercial Matters), the judgment of 28 March 2000 in Case C-7198Krombacft is to be noted, concerning the concept of public policy as referred to in Article 27 , point 1, of the Convention.
Det sidstnaevnte omräde var centralt i Greenpeace France-sagen (dom af2r.3.2000, sag C-6l99, Sml. I, S.1651),hvori GreenpeaceFrance og andresarlmenslutninger ved en national ret havde nedlagt pästand om annullation afen ministeriel bekendtgorelse, der godkendte markedsfsring af frs fra vissegenetisk modificerede majssorter.
Under that provision, a judgment givenin a Contracting State is not to be recognisedin another Contracting State if such recognition is contrary to public policy in the State in which recognition is sought.Relying on the nationality of the victim to found its jurisdiction, the court of the first State (the State of origin) convictedMr Krombach of an intentional offenceunder the contempt procedure, that is to say without hearing the defence counselinstructed by Mr Krombach.
Idet den nationale ret vurderede, at dennebekendtgsrelse kunne tä alvorlige konsekvenser, udsatte den densgennemforelse og forelagde et sporgsmäl for Domstolen om det sksn, enmedlemsstater i besiddelse af inden for de ordninger, der er indfsrt ved
The court of the State in which enforcement wassought of the civil judgment also obtained in that case asked the Court of Justicewhether, in such a situation, it could take account of the fact that the court of the State of origin based its jurisdiction on the nationality of the victim of an offenceand denied Mr Krombach the right to defendhimself without appearing in person.The Court held that the Contracting States in principle remain free, by virtue of the proviso in Article 27 , point 1, of the Convention, to determine, according to
Säfremt denationale myndigheder, der fra et selskab har modtaget en ansogning ommarkedsfsring af en GMO, ikke giver afslag pä denne ansogning, skal desende dossieret til Kommissionen med en positiv udtalelse. Domstolen fastslog,at de nationale myndigheder, der pä dette stade forelregger sagen for Kommissionen, har mulighed for fuldt ud at foretage vurdering af risikoen formenneskers sundhed og miljoet.
Consequently, whileit is not for the Court to define the content of the public policy of a Contracting State, it is none the less required to review the limits within which the courts ofa Contracting State may have recourse to that concept for the purpose of refusingrecognition to a judgment emanatingfrom a court in another Contracting State.The court of the State in which enforcement is sought cannot, with respect to adefendant domiciled in that State, take account, for the purposes of the public- policy clause in Article 27 , point 1, of the Convention, of the fact, without more,that the court of the State of origin based its jurisdiction on the nationality of the victim of an offence.
När Kommissionen har fäet dossieret forelagt,fastsretter direktiv 901220en frist, i lsbet af hvilken de andre medlemsstaterskompetente myndigheder skal hsres.
Recourse to the publicpolicy clause can be envisaged onlywhere recognition or enforcement of the judgment delivered in anotherContracting State would be at varianceto an unacceptable degree with the legalorder of the State in which enforcement is sought inasmuch as it infringes afundamental principle.
Overholdelsen af forsigtighedsprincippetkommer til udtryk ved, at virksomheden er forpligtet til straks at underretteden kompetente myndighed om nye oplysninger om risici, som produktetmedfsrer for menneskers sundhed eller miljoet, og ved, at den kompetentemyndighed straks skal underrette Kommissionen og de andre medlemsstaterherom, men ogsä ved, at enhver medlemsstat midlertidigt kan begr & nse ellerforbyde anvendelse og/eller salg pä sit omräde af et produkt, hvortil der ergivet skriftlig godkendelse, säfremt den har berettiget grund til at formode, atdet udgor en risiko for menneskers sundhed eller miljoet.
In order for the prohibition of any review of the foreignjudgment as to its substance to be observed, the infringement would have toconstitute a manifest breach of a rule of law regarded as essential in the legalorder of the State in which enforcement is sought or of a right recognised asbeing fundamental within that legal order.
Denbeskyttelsesordning, som er ivarksat ved direktiv 901220, indebrerernsdvendigvis, at den pägreldende medlemsstat ikke kan v & re forpligtet til atudstede en skriftlig godkendelse, säfremt den i mellemtidenhar modtaget nyeoplysninger, som giver den grundlag for at antage, at det anmeldteprodukt kanindebrere en risiko for den menneskelige sundhed og miljoet.
The Court then found that recourseto the public policy clause must be regarded as being possible in exceptional caseswhere the guarantees laid down in the legislation of the State of origin and in the Convention itself have been insufficient to protect the defendantfrom a manifestbreach of his right to defendhimself before the court of origin, as recognised bythe European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and FundamentalFreedoms .
I et sädanttilfrelde er den forpligtet til straks at underrette Kommissionen og de andremedlemsstater, säledes at der kan trreffes afgorelse i sagen i overensstemmelsemed den i direktiv 901220fastsatte procedure.
It follows from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rightsthat a national court of a Contracting State is entitled to hold that a refusal to hearthe defence of an accused person who is not present at the hearing constitutes amanifest breach of a fundamentalright.
Säfremt medlemsstaten, som detvar tilfreldet i sagen, har fremsendt anmeldelsentil Kommissionen sammenmed en positiv udtalelse,og Kommissionen har vedtaget en positiv afgorelse, er den imidlertid forpligtet til at udstede en skriftlig godkendelse, säledes atproduktet kan markedsfsres. När en national ret konstaterer eventuelleuregelmressigheder i behandlingen af en ansogning om markedsfsring, der eraf en sädanart, at de kan rejse tvivl om gyldigheden af Kommissionens
Accordingly, the court of the State inwhich enforcement is sought can, with respect to a defendantdomiciled in that State and prosecutedfor an intentional offence, take account, in relation to thepublic-policy clause, of the fact that the court of the State of origin refused toallow that person to have his defence presented unless he appeared in person.
Rädets direktiv 90/220lEgF af 23.4.t990 om udsretning i miljoet af genetiskmodificerede organismer (EFT L II7, s. 15), som aendret ved Kommissionens direktiv
The Court held that that principle does notpreclude a Member State from apptyingto Turkish workers legislation which, for
positive afgorelse, er denne nationale ret forpligtet til at forelegge sagenprrejudicielt for Domstolen, idet retten i givet fald skal trreffe bestemmelse om,at gennemfsrelsen af den positive afgorelse skal udsrettes, indtil Domstolen hartaget stilling til gyldighedssporgsmälet. Det er säledes kun Domstolen, der erbefojet til at fastslä, at en frellesskabsretsakt er ugyldig.
the purposes of awarding a retirement pension and determining the social securitynumber allocatedfor that purpose, takes as the conclusivedate of birth the onegiven in the first declaration made by the person concerned to a social securityauthority in that Member State and allows another date of birth to be taken intoaccount only if a document is produced the original of which was issued beforethat declaration was made.
Med hensyn til de mere traditionelle miljoomräder erindres om Forna,sdr-sagen(domaf 22.6.2000, sag C-318/98, endnuikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser)vedrsrende begrebet farligt affald. Domstolen praeciserede,at direktiv 9Ll689lEZF om farligt affald 28 ikke afskrerer medlemsstaterne ogdomstolene inden for disses kompetence fra at kvalificere andet affald som farligt end det, der findes pä listen over farligt affald som vedtaget ved
Such national legislation applies irrespectiveof thenationality of the workers concerned and accords to the documents to be producedin order to set aside the date of birth indicatedin the first declaration made to asocial security authority the same probative value regardlessof their provenance or origin.
, og säledes vedtage strengere beskyttelsesforanstaltninger for at forbyde henkastning,dumpning og ukontrolleret bortskaffelseaf sädant affald. I denne situationpähviler det den pägreldende medlemsstats myndigheder, der er kompetente i medfsr af national ret, at give meddelelse om disse tilfrelde til Kommissioneni overensstemmelse med direktivet.
Unlike the provisions at issue in Case C-336194Dafeki !l997l ECRI-676I, the legislation at issue here does not place Turkish nationals in a different legal situation from that of nationals of the Member State in which they reside.Nor does it involve any difference of treatment such as to constitute indirectdiscriminationon grounds of nationality, since it is not permissible,on the basisof the principle of nondiscrimination on grounds of nationality, to require a Member State which lays down rules regarding the determination of dates of birthfor the purpose of establishing a social security number and of awarding aretirement pension to take account of particular circumstances which derive fromthe Turkish legislation on civil status and of the detailed arrangements for its application in practice.
Säledes skal lovgivningsprocessen normalt gare det muligt at näde mäI, der forfslges ved dette direktiv, herunder at stille oplysninger tilrädighed.
Confirming the validity of thecontested decision, the Court rejected inter alia the argument that, having regardin particular to the second paragraph of Article 136 of the Treaty (now, afteramendment, the second paragraph of Article 187 EC), there is a "locking"principle whereby the advantagesaccorded to the OCTs as the process ofassociation is taken forward in stages cannot be detractedfrom.
For den nationale ret anfregtede ejerne af de parceller,der i dennesag skulle eksproprieresi henhold til en national lov med henblik pä atgennemfore en motorvejsforbindelse, lovligheden af den ved eksproprieringenfulgte fremgangsmäde med den begrundelse, at den ikke var forenelig meddirektiv 851337. Domstolen fastslog, at begrebet srerlig national lov i direktivetskal fortolkes selvstrndigt som falge af de krav, der er forbundet med en
In weighing thevarious objectives laid down by the Treaty and whilst taking overall account ofthe experience acquired as a result of its earlier decisions, the Council, whichenjoys for that purpose a considerablemargin of discretionreflecting the politicalresponsibilities entrusted to it by the provisions of the Treaty relating toagricultural policy and by Article 136 of the Treaty, may be prompted, in caseof need,to curtail certain advantages previously granted to the OCTs.
Rädets beslutning 94l904lEF af 22.12.1994 om udarbejdelse af en liste over farligtaffald i henhold til artikel 1, stk.4, i direktiv 91/689/EOFom farligt affald (EFT
Providedit was established that the application of the rule on cumulation of origin in thesugar sector was liable to lead to significant disturbances in the functioning of a
ensartet anvendelse af frellesskabsretten og af lighedsprincippet.En retsakt, derer vedtaget af et parlamentefter offentlige parlamentariskeforhandlinger, eren serlig lov i denne bestemmelses forstand, när direktiv 851337'smäI, herunder at der stilles oplysninger til rädighed for offentligheden, har kunnetnäs gennem lovgivningsprocessen,og när de oplysninger, som parlamenteträdede over pä det tidspunkt, da det vedtog projektet i enkeltheder, svarede tildem, som skulle have vreret forelagt den kompetente myndighed under enalmindelig procedure for godkendelse af projektet.
common market organisation, the Council, after weighing the objectives ofassociation of the OCTs against those of the comrnon agricultural policY, wasentitled to adopt, in compliance with the principles of Community lawcircumscribing its margin of discretion, any measure capable of bringing to anend or mitigating such disturbances, including the removal or limitation ofadvantages previously granted to the OCTs. That was particularly true where theadvantages in question were of an extraordinary nature, having regard to the ruleson the functioning of the Community market.
En national ret kanefterprove, om den nationale lovgiver har holdt sig inden for de i direktiv851337 fastsatte grenser for sksnnet,navnlig när der ikke er foretaget nogenforudgäende vurdering af projektets indvirkning pä miljoet, när demindsteoplysninger, bygherren skal fremkomme med, ikke er blevet stillet tilrädighed for offentligheden, og när de bersrte dele af offentlighedeni stridmed direktivets forskrifter, ikke har fäet lejlighed til at udtale sig, indenprojektet blev päbegyndt.
The rule which allowed certainproducts from the ACP States,after certain operations had been carried out, tobe classified as being of OCT origin fell into that category. As to the remainder,the Court rejected argumentsalleging that the contested decision infringed theprinciple of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle ofproportionality, and Article 133(1) of the Treaty (now, after amendment,Article 184(1)EC) and the second paragraph of Article 136 of the Treaty.
Endelig for sä vidt angär direktiv 92l43lEgF om bevaring af naturtyper samtvilde dyr og planter preciserede Domstolen i First Corporate Shipping-sagen(dom af 7.11.2000, sag C-371198, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgarelser),at en medlemsstat ikke ved valget og afgrrensningen af lokaliteter, som denskal foreslä Kommissionen som lokaliteter, der kan udpeges som lokaliteter affrellesskabsbetydning som omhandlet i direktivet, mä tage hensyn tilskonomiske, sociale og kulturelle behov og til regionale og lokale serpreg.For at Kommissionen kan opstille et udkast til en liste over lokaliteter affellesskabsbetydning med henblik pä at oprette et sammenhrengende europreiskokologisk net af srerligt bevaringsomräde,mä den have en udtsmmendeoversigt over valgte lokaliteter, der pä nationalt niveau har en relevantokologisk interesse med hensyn til det formäI, som tilsigtes ved direktiv 92143,nemlig bevaring af naturtyper samt vilde dyr og planter. Det er kun pä dennemäde muligt at realisere formälet, der tilsigtes ved direktivet 92143opretholdelsen eller genopretningen af en gunstig bevaringsstatusfor depägreldende naturtyper og levestederfor de pägrldende arter i deres naturligeudbredelsesomräde.
Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden, the Council adopted a regulation in November 1995 authorising the European Parliament to adopt measuresterminating the service of officials who had reachedthe age of 55. After theappointing authority had refused a request by certain officials of the Court of Justice to be entered on the list of persons having expressedan interest in sucha measure for their release on the ground that only the Parliament could adoptsuch measures, those officials brought actions before the Court of First Instancefor a declaration that the regulation in question was unlawful and for annulmentof the decisions of the appointing authority.
Men disse omräder kan vere beliggendepä begge sideraf en eller flere af Frellesskabets indre grenser, og en medlemsstat er ikke, närden udarbejder den nationalelokalitetsliste, i stand til at have et prrecist ogdetaljeret kendskab tit tokalitetssituationeni de andre medlemsstater. Derforkan denne medlemsstat ikke pä egen händ - heller ikke under henvisning tilde skonomiske, sociale og kulturelle behov eller regionale og lokale serpreg- udelukke lokaliteter, der pä nationalt niveau har en relevant okologiskinteresse set ud fra bevaringsformäletuden at bringe virkeliggsrelsen af detteformäl i fare pä frellesskabsniveau.
The Court of Justice pointed outthat termination-of-service measures, such as those which were permitted by thecontested regulation, do not have their legal origin in the Staff Regulations andtherefore do not constitute a standard event in the careers of the personsconcerned.
Pä grundlag af denforurettedes statsborgerskabdsmte retten i domsstaten Krombach for enforsretlig lovovertraedelse efter reglerne om udeblevnetiltalte, dvs. uden atgive de af Krombach antagne forsvarere adgang til at svare i sagen.
for it and, second, that even if there is such a provision, the institution concernedis not obliged either to grant the requests submitted to it or to make even partialuse of the power conferred on it to decide to terminatethe service of some of itsofficials.
Det tilkommersäledes ikke Domstolen at fastleegge indholdet af en kontraherende statsgrundlreggende retsprincipper, men det pähviler den dog at efterpreive degr & nser, inden for hvilke en ret i en kontraherende stat kan anvende begrebet som begrundelse for ikke at anerkendeen retsafgorelse, der er truffet af en reti en anden kontraherende stat.
Thus, the Court of First Instancewas wrong to declare admissible an objection of illegality raised against thecontested regulation by the Court officials in proceedings for the annulment of adecision by which the appointing authority had rejected their requeststo beentered on the list of officials interested in measures for their release.
trykt i Samling af Afgorelser) vedrorende vedtegten for tienestemrend ogavrige ansatte i de Europeiske Fellesskaber.
Law School of the University of Copenhagen; in private pracrice;Chairman and rnember of arbitral tribunals: Member of Administrative
I forbindelse med Republikken
David Alexander Ogilvy Edward
I appelsagen ophevede Domstolen Rettensdom, og idet den fandt, at da de forenede sager var modne til päkendelse,afgjorde den de af tjenestemrendene anlagte sager ved at frifinde Domstolen.Domstolen understregede, at foranstaltninger til udtrredenaf tjenesten - somdem, der var givet mulighed for ved den omtvistede forordning - ikke havdederes retlige grundlag i vedtegten og dermed ikke udgiorde et ordinrert led ide pägeldendes karriereforlsb.
Consultative Committee of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Community; Salvesen Professor of European Institutions and Director of the Europa Institute, University of Edinburgh; Special Adviser to the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities;
Sädanne udtradelsesforanstaltninger mäderimod betragtes som en praksis, Fellesskabet har benyttetved enkeltstäendelejligheder af hensyn til institutionernesfunktion.
Honorary Bencher, Gray's Inn, London; Judge at the court of FirstInstance from 25 September 1989 to 9 March 1992; Judge ar rhe Court of Justice since 10 March 1992.