natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Schiavon har rejst indsigelse mod begæringen herom, og har herved anført, at da de omtvistede indførsler var omfattet af forordning nr. 545/92 og 859/92, og sidstnævnte ikke for den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien angiver hvilket organ, der har kompetence til at udstede oprindelsescertifikater for indført oksekød, må det tidligere kompetente organ Savezni Trzisni Inspektorat, Beograd, anses for at være det organ, der kan udstede sådanne certifikater for indførsler fra den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien, i tidsrummet inden der blev udpeget et kompetent organ for dette land, hvilket først skete i 1993.
It is apparent from the order for reference that on 28 September, 6 October and 19 October 1992, Schiavon carried out three import operations bringing "baby-beef originating in and coming from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia into the Community under the arrangements by which import levies and value added tax were suspended.
Det oksekød, der var omfattet af de omtvistede indførsler, må derfor være omfattet af fællesskabsrettens præferenceordning.
The total value of the imports was ITL 179 903 600 ('the disputed imports').
De præjudicielle spørgsmål skal besvares med, at artikel 7 i forordning nr. 545/92 samt forordning nr. 859/92 skal fortolkes således, at indførsel til Fællesskabet, der fandt sted i september og oktober 1992 af partier af oksekød af typen »baby-beef« med oprindelse i og hidrørende fra den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien, for hvilke oprindelsescertifikater var blevet udstedt af det jugoslaviske organ, der var kompetent hertil før Fællesskabets opsigelse af samarbejdsaftalen EØF-Jugoslavien, ikke kan være omfattet af den ordning med nedsatte afgifter ved indførsel, der er fastlagt i artikel 7 i forordning nr. 545/92, selv om det nye kompetente organ for den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien endnu ikke var udpeget på det tidspunkt, hvor indførslerne fandt sted.
By order of 10 June 1998, the Tribunale Civile e Penale (Civil and Criminal District Court), Treviso, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling two questions on the interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 545/92 of 3 February 1992 concerning the arrangements applicable to the import into the Community of products originating in the Republics of Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugoslav Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 859/92 of 3 April 1992 laying down detailed rules governing imports of "baby-beef originating in the Republics of Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugoslav Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro.
Amministrazione har herimod anført, at begunstigelsen ved indførslen ifølge forordning nr. 545/92 var betinget af, at der var udstedt oprindelsescertifikater af det organ, som Fællesskabet havde anerkendt som kompetent hertil.
With a view to taking advantage of the preferential arrangements, Schiavon submitted certificates of origin which accorded with the specimen in Annex I to Regulation No 1368/88 and which were issued by the Savezni Trzisni Inspektorat, Beograd, the issuing body designated in Annex II to that Regulation.
»Artikel 7 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 545/92 af 3. februar 1992 om ordningen for indførsel til Fællesskabet af varer med oprindelse i republikkerne Kroatien og Slovenien og i de jugoslaviske republikker Bosnien-Hercegovina, Makedonien og Montenegro og Kommissionens fomrdning (EØF) nr. 859/92 af 3. april 1992 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for indførslen af visse oksekødsprodukter med oprindelse i republikkerne Kroatien og Slovenien og i de jugoslaviske republikker Bosnien-Hercegovina, Makedonien og Montenegro
The questions have been raised in proceedings between the Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato and the insolvent Italian undertaking Schiavon Silvano, represented by its liquidator, concerning imports into the Community of *baby-beef originating in and imported from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
skal fortolkes således, at indførsel til Fællesskabet, der fandt sted i september og oktober 1992, af partier af oksekød af typen 'baby-beef med oprindelse i og hidrørende fra den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien, for hvilke oprindelsescertifikater var blevet udstedt af det jugoslaviske organ, der var kompetent hertil før Fællesskabets opsigelse af samarbejdsaftalen EØF-Jugoslavien, ikke kan være omfattet af den ordning med nedsatte afgifter ved indførsel, der er fastlagt i artikel 7 i forordning nr. 545/92, selv om det nye kompetente organ for den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien endnu ikke var udpeget på det tidspunkt, hvor indførslerne fandt sted«
The questions submitted for a preliminary ruling products in question to be eligible for the preferential trading treatment provided for in the Community legislation applying at the time of the events and asked Schiavon to pay a total of ITL 233 971 480 by way of import levies and value added tax, plus interest.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling') den 13. januar 2000.
In those circumstances the Tribunale Civile e Penale di Treviso decided to stay the proceedings and refer a number of questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Sag C-45/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik Socialpolitik
By decision of the Tribunale Civile e Penale di Treviso of 5 October 1995, Schiavon was declared insolvent.
»Traktatbrud — manglende gennemførelse (Fjerde Afdeling) efterkomme direktivet senest den 22. juni 1996 eller sikre senest på denne dato, at arbejdsmarkedets parter indfører de nødvendige bestemmelser ved overenskomster, og at medlemsstaterne straks skal underrette Kommissionen herom.
According to the Court, the questions referred to it, taken together, must be understood as seeking essentially to ascertain whether Article 7 of Regulation No 545/92, and Regulation No 859/92, must be interpreted as meaning that the importation into the Community in September and October 1992 of consignments of 'babybeef originating in and coming from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia with certificates of origin issued by the Yugoslav body which was the competent authority prior to the denunciation by the Community of the EEC-Yugoslavia Cooperation Agreement was capable of benefiting from the arrangements for reduced import levies laid down in Article 7 of Regulation No 545/92 until such time as a new competent body was designated for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 16. februar 1999 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af EF-traktatens artikel 169 (nu artikel 226 EF) anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Franske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EF-traktaten og Rådets direktiv 94/33/EF af 22. juni 1994 om beskyttelse af unge på arbejdspladsen, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har vedtaget de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivet, eller subsidiært ikke har givet meddelelse herom.
Schiavon objects to this application on the grounds that, since the disputed imports were governed by Regulations Nos 545/92 and 859/92 and since Regulation No 859/92 did not include for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia a body authorised to issue certificates of origin for imported beef and veal, the Savezni Trzisni Inspektorat, Beograd, the competent body in the past, should be deemed to have continued to be the body authorised to issue the relevant certificates for imports coming from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia until such time as a competent body was designated for that country, which only occurred in 1993.
Det bestemmes i direktivets artikel 17, at medlemsstaterne skal sætte de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at
The reply to the questions referred to the Court must be that Article 7 of Regulation No 545/92, and Regulation No 859/92, must be interpreted as meaning that the importation into the Community in September and October 1992 of consignments of *baby-beef originating in and coming from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia with certificates of origin issued by the Yugoslav body which was the competent authority prior to the denunciation by the Community of the EEC-Yugoslavia Cooperation Agreement was not capable of benefiting from the arrangements for reduced import levies provided for in Article 7 of Regulation No 545/92, even though a new competent body had not been designated for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia at the time the import operations took place.
Da Kommissionen ikke havde modtaget underretning fra den franske regering om de foranstaltninger, der var blevet truffet til gennemførelse af direktivet i den franske retsorden, og i øvrigt ikke besad oplysninger, på grundlag af hvilke den kunne fastslå, at Den Franske Republik havde vedtaget de nødvendige bestemmelser, besluttede den at indlede en procedure mod denne medlemsstat i henhold til traktatens artikel 169.
The Amministrazione maintains, by contrast, that the preferential treatment for imports laid down by Regulation No 545/92 was conditional on the issue of certificates of origin by the body recognised by the Community as competent.
Efter at have gjort Den
The Court ruled:
Det skal fastslås, at Den Franske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til direktivet, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har vedtaget de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme dette.
Republics of Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugoslav Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 859/92 of 3 April 1992 laying down detailed rules governing imports of "baby-beef originating in the Republics of Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugostov Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro must be interpreted as meaning that the importation into the Community in September and October 1992 of consignments of "baby-beef originating in and coming from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia with certificates of origin issued by the Yugoslav body which was the competent authority prior to the denunciation by the Community of the EEC-Yugoslavia Cooperation Agreement was not capable of benefiting from the arrangements for reduced import levies provided for in Article 7 of Regulation No 545/92, even though a new competent body had not been designated for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia at the time the import operations took place.'
Præjudiciel »Landbrug — veterinærsundhed ved handel inden for Fællesskabet med frosset tyresæd og indførsel heraf— certificering af tyresæd til eksport til en medlemsstat - direktiv 88/407IEØF og 93/60/EØF — tidsmæssig anvendelse« (Femte Afdeling)
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 16 February 1999, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty (now Article 226 EC) for a declaration that, by failing to adopt, alternatively to communicate to it, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 94/33/EC of 22 June 1994 on the protection of young people at work, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and under that directive.
blevet opsamlet inden udløbet af fristen for gennemførelse af direktiv 93/60, med henblik på eksport til Belgien og Frankrig.
still had to be supplemented in order to ensure satisfactory implementation. They stated that a draft Law containing the necessary provisions was shortly due to be laid before the Parliament.
Ved afgørelse af 10. juni 1996 afviste den nederlandske landbrugsminister ansøgningen med den begrundelse, at tyren på tidspunktet for den planlagte eksport af den frosne sæd ikke opfyldte betingelsen om, at den ikke må have været holdt på en eller flere besætninger med en lavere status end besætninger, der er officielt fri for brucellose.
the absence of any other information from which it could conclude that the French Republic had brought into force the necessary provisions, the Commission decided to initiate against that Member State the procedure laid down in Article 169 of the Treaty. By letter of 16 January 1997, the Commission, after reminding the French Republic of its obligations under the directive, gave it formal notice to submit its observations within a period of two months.
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst i en sag mellem KVS International BV (herefter »KVS«) og Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (det nederlandske ministerium for landbrug, naturbeskyttelse og fiskeri) vedrørende udstedelsen af et certifikat til eksport af frosset tyresæd til andre medlemsstater.
The French authorities replied, on 13 March 1997, that the French legislation in force already contained most of the legislative provisions of the directive but acknowledged that legislation
KVS anlagde herefter sag til prøvelse af afslaget på eksportcertifikat ved College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven, der har besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen fire præjudicielle spørgsmål.
The Court finds, that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive.
Med det fjerde spørgsmål, der behandles først, ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om artikel 3, litra b), i direktiv 88/407 sammenholdt med direktivets bilag B, kapitel I, punkt 1, litra b), i den oprindelige affattelse og i den affattelse, der følger af direktiv 93/60, skal fortolkes således, at sæden fra en tyr, der inden indsættelsen på en godkendt tyrestation tilhørte en besætning, der ikke var officielt fri for brucellose, er udelukket fra handel inden for Fællesskabet allerede af den grund, at besætningen har ændret sundhedsstatus, mens dyret har været holdt i denne besætning.
Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 94/33/EC of 22 June 1994 on the protection of young people at work, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and under that directive;
Domstolens bemærkninger
Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.'
Her forblev tyren, indtil den i oktober 1991 blev eksporteret til Nederlandene, hvor den efter en periode i isolation og prøver for brucellose med negativ reaktion blev indsat på en godkendt tyrestation, der bliver drevet af KVS.
Advocate General A Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 10 February 2000.
Direktiv 88/407 har således navnlig til formål at fjerne tyresæd fra markedet, såfremt det indebærer en fare for udbredelsen af smitsomme husdyrsygdomme, herunder brucellose.
herd in which it was and had been kept had been, during a certain time, a centre of brucellosis.
I denne henseende er det i artikel 3, litra b), i direktiv 88/407 sammenholdt med direktivets bilag B, kapitel I, punkt 1, litra b), fastsat, at kun produkter, der er hidrører fra udvalgte dyr i besætninger, der er fri for brucellose, har adgang til markedet.
On 7 June 1996, KVS applied to the competent Netherlands authority for certification of the deep-frozen semen of the bull, collected before the expiry of the deadline for the implementation of Directive 93/60, with a view to its export to Belgium and France.
Under hensyn til ovenstående skal fjerde spørgsmål besvares med, at artikel 3, litra b), i direktiv 88/407 sammenholdt med direktivets bilag B, kapitel I, punkt 1, litra b), i den oprindelige affattelse og i den affattelse, der følger af direktiv 93/60, skal fortolkes således, at sæd fra en tyr, der inden indsættelsen på en godkendt tyrestation tilhørte en besætning, der ikke var officielt fri for brucellose, er udelukket fra handel inden for Fællesskabet allerede af den grund, at besætningen har ændret sundhedsstatus, mens dyret har været holdt i denne besætning.
By order of 17 July 1998, the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling four questions on the interpretation of Article 3 of Council Directive 88/407/EEC of 14 June 1988 and paragraph 1(b) of Chapter I of Annex Β to the same directive, both in its original version and as amended by Council Directive 93/60/EEC of 30 June 1993 amending Directive 88/407/EEC and extending it to cover fresh bovine semen, and the validity of the latter directive
Under hensyn til besvarelse af fjerde spørgsmål er det unødvendigt at besvare de øvrige præjudicielle spørgsmål.
By decision of 10 June 1996, the Netherlands Minister for Agriculture rejected the application on the ground that, at the time of the planned exportation of its deep-frozen semen, the bull did not fulfil the requirement of not having previously been kept in one or more herds of a status lower than that of officially brucellosis free.
Bekæmpelsen af brucellose, der er det formål, som følges af direktiv 88/407, kræver, at udtrykket »i en eller flere besætninger med lavere status« i den oprindelige affattelse af bilag B, kapitel I, punkt 1, litra b), skal forstås således, at det omfatter enhver besætning med en lavere sundhedsstatus, som dyret har været holdt i.
Those questions arose in proceedings between KVS International BV (hereinafter 'KVS') and the Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (Netherlands Minister for Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries) concerning the procurement of a certificate for the purpose of exportation of the deep-frozen semen of a bull to other Member States.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Facts in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
»Artikel 3, litra b), i Rådets direktiv 88/407/EØF af 14. juni 1988 om fastsættelse af de veterinærpolitimæssige krav i forbindelse med handelen inden for Fællesskabet med frosset tyresæd og indførsel heraf sammenholdt med direktivets bilag B, kapitel I, punkt 1, litra b), i den oprindelige affattelse og i den affattelse, der følger af Rådets direktiv 93/60/EØF af 30. juni 1993 om ændring af direktiv 88/407/EØF om fastsættelse af de veterinærpolitimæssige krav i forbindelse med handelen indenfor Fællesskabet med frosset tyresæd og indførsel heraf og om udvidelse af det til at omfatte frisk tyresæd, skal fortolkes således, at sæd fra en tyr, der inden indsættelsen på en godkendt tyrestation tilhørte en besætning der ikke var officielt fri for brucellose, er udelukket fra handel inden for Fællesskabet allerede af den grund, at besætningen har ændret sundhedsstatus, mens dyret har været holdt i denne besætning.«
On 7 June 1996, that is to say, after the expiry of the period prescribed for transposing Directive 93/60, KVS applied for certification with a view to the exportation of deep-frozen semen, collected prior to that date, to other Member States.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 27. januar 2000.
The bull in question from which the semen was obtained was born in 1988 on a holding in Belgium, for which the status of a herd officially free of brucellosis was not accorded until 1 January 1991.
Præjudiciel »Kosttilskud — direktiv 89/398/EØF — gennemførelse — betingelser nationale bestemmelser — tilsæmingsstof — L-camitin« (Sjette Afdeling)
As for its wording, paragraph 1(b) of Chapter I of Annex B, as amended by Directive 93/60, which bars from approved semen collection centres any animals which have previously been kept 'in one or more herds of a lower status', is not ambiguous but refers incontestably to any herd physically different to that in which the animal is currently kept as well as to that latter herd in its previous state, at a time when it had only a health status lower than that of officially brucellosis free.
Ved dom af 19. juli 1996 har Tribunal de grande instance de Grasse forelagt Domstolen fem præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 89/398/EØF af 3. maj 1989 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om levnedsmidler bestemt til særlig ernæring.
Thus, Directive 88/407 aims in particular at removing from the market any semen from animals of the bovine species which is likely to pose a risk of spreading zoonoses, including brucellosis.
Arkopharma er blevet tiltalt for at have forfalsket levnedsmidler til menneskers ernæring og for at have solgt forfalskede levnedsmidler i strid med artikel L 213-1 og L 213-3 i den franske code de la consommation. Ved forfalskede levnedsmidler forstås levnedsmidler, som ikke opfylder kravene i den gældende lovgivning.
To that end, Article 3(b) of Directive 88/407, read in conjunction with paragraph 1(b) of Chapter I of Annex Β to that directive, provides that only the product obtained from animals belonging to brucellosis-free herds has access to that market.
Formaliteten med hensyn til de præjudicielle spørgsmål
In view of the answer given to the fourth question, it is not necessary to give an answer to the other questions referred to the Court.
Fortolkningen af direktiv 89/398 med henblik på besvarelsen af de omformulerede spørgsmål skal således samtidig tilvejebringe alle nødvendige oplysninger, for at den nationale ret kan bedømme de nationale bestemmelsers forenelighed med direktivet.
Preliminary ruling (Food supplements — Directive 89/398/EEC — Transposition — Conditions — Retention of previous national legislation — Additive — 'L-carnitine') (Sixth Chamber)
Inden besvarelsen af det første, andet og tredje spørgsmål, således som de er blevet omformuleret, skal det undersøges, om direktiv 89/398 kan finde anvendelse på de produkter indeholdende Lcarnitin i større mængder, som forhandles af Arkopharma.
Article 1(2) of Council Directive 89/398/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to foodstuffs intended f or particular nutritional uses must be interpreted as meaning that food supplements such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which contain L-carnitine in high doses and which are marketed on the basis that they are suitable for a particular nutritional purpose, fall within the scope of the Directive unless the national court establishes that they are not suitable for the nutritional purposes that the manufacturer claims they are or that they do not fulfil the particular nutritional requirements of one of the categories of persons referred to in Article l(2)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Directive.
Det er ubestridt, at de af Arkopharma forhandlede produkter er kosttilskud, der har en særlig sammensætning, idet de indeholder
In the absence of any provision in Directive 89/398/EEC itself, or in the directives adopted pursuant to Article 4 of the Directive, as to the composition of foodstuffs intended f or particular nutritional uses or the use of additives or substances for specific nutritional purposes in the manufacture ofthat type ofproduct, no relevant Community rules exist, as Community law presently stands, on which individuals may rely in order to challenge national rules on additives and substances for nutritional purposes authorised in the manufacture of foodstuffs of the kind at issue in the main proceedings.
betydelige mængder Lcarnitin og således klart adskiller sig fra almindelige levnedsmidler.
nutritional purposes used in their manufacture, to the requirements flowing from general principles recognised by Community law, and, in particular, the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
Det bemærkes, at artikel 4, stk. 2, i direktiv 89/398 foreskriver, at der skal vedtages en liste over stoffer, der må anvendes i specielt ernæringsmæssigt øjemed, såsom vitaminer, mineralsalte og aminosyrer.
However, in the main proceedings the relevant Community rules could not give rise to a legitimate expectation on the part of Arkopharma on which it could reasonably rely.