natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
— Spørgsmålet om der foreligger særlige forhold svigagtige karakter af de fakturaer, som sagsøgeren havde modtaget fra Ruva, udgør et særligt forhold i artikel 13's forstand, kan heller ikke tages til følge.
The second argument relied on by the applicant, namely that the fact that the invoices submitted to it by Ruva were fraudulent amounted to a special situation for the purposes of Article 13, must also be rejected.
Kommissionen har ved at fastslå, at denne omstændighed hører til de erhvervsmæssige risici, som en toldspeditør udsætter sig for i kraft af sin stilling, ikke anlagt et åbenbart fejlskøn.
In taking the view that that was, by the very nature of a customs agent's work, a trade risk accepted by him, the
Kommissionen anlagde således ikke noget åbenbart fejlskøn, da den vurderede, at de forhold, som sagsøgeren havde påberåbt sig, ikke var særlige forhold i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i artikel 13 i forordning nr. 1430/79.
The procedure followed by the Commission in adopting the contested decision was therefore tainted by irregularities. However, those irregularities cannot result in the annulment of
— Spørgsmålet om der er begået urigtigheder eller åbenlys forsømmelse
Commission did not make a manifest error of assessment.
Sagsøgerens andet anbringende om, at den
The Commission did not therefore make a manifest error of assessment in deciding that the factors referred to by the applicant did not constitute a special situation for the purposes of Article 13 of Regulation No 1430/79.
Sagsøgeren betaler sagens omkostninger.«
Orders the applicant to pay all the costs.'
Præjudiciel- OberlandesgerichtKöln —fortolkning af artikel 2, stk 1, litra a), nr. i), i Rådets direktiv 79I112IE0F af 18. december 1978 om tilnærmehe
Preliminary ruling - Oberlandesgericht Köln -Interpretation of Article 2(l)(a)(i) of Council Directive 79/112/EECofl8 December 1978 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for sale to the ultimate consumer (OJ 1979 L 33, p.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 20. januar 2000.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 20 January 2000.
af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om mærkning af og præsentationsmåder for levnedsmidler bestemt til den endelige forbruger samt om reklame for sådanne levnedsmidler — jordbærmarmelade
Preliminaryruling—Pretura Circondariale, Pinerolo — Interpretation of Articles 1 and 3(1) of Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees ' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses — Definition of transfer Transfer, pursuant to the law, of the management of a public interest service from a public entity to a private company all the shares in which are held by the State — Transferee required to continue employment contracts and preserve workers ' rights such as those deriving from length of service
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 20. januar 2000.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 18 January 2000.
Appel afkendehe afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Tredje Afdeling) den 16. juli 1998 i sag T-274/97, Ca' Pasta Sri mod Kommissionen — kendelse om afvisning af et annullationssøgsmål anlagt til prøvelse af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4028/86 af 18. december 1986 om fællesskabsforanstaltninger til forbedring og tilpasning af fiskeri- og akvakulturerne
Appeal against the order made on 16 July 1988 by the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-274/97 between Caw ' Pasta Sri and Commission — Order dismissing as inadmissible an action for the annulment of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 of 18 December 1986 on Community measures to improve and adapt smtcmres in the fisheries and aquaculture sector
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—ufuldstændiggennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 92/49/EØF af 18. juni 1992 om samordning aflove og administrative bestemmelser vedrørende direkte forsikringsvirksomhed bortset fra livsforsikring og om ændring af direktiv 731239 /EØF og 88/357/EØF (tredje skadeforsikringsdirektiv) — udelukkelse fra den nationale gennemførelseslovs anvendekesområde af forsikringskasser eller -virksomheder, som dækker risici for arbejdsskader, selv om disse virksomheders formål er at indtjene overskud for egen risiko
Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Defective transposition of Council Directive 92/49/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life insurance Directive) — Exclusion from the scope of the national transposing legislation of any insurance fund or undertaking covering the risk of accidents at work, even where such undertakings carry on business at their own risk with a view to profit
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Anden Afdeling) den 20. januar 2000.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 20 January 2000.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 20. januar 2000.
Advocate General A. Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 20 January 2000.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
(1) dismiss the appeal;
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
(2) order Ca'Pasta to pay the costs.
Sag C-50/99 Jean-Marie Podestà / Caisse de retraite par répartition des ingénieurs cadres & assimilés (CRICA) m.fl. Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende udarbejdelse inden for den fastsatte frist af de handlingsprogrammer, der erforeskrevet i artikel 5 i Rådets direktiv 91/676/EØF af 11 december 1991 om beskyttelse afvand mod forurening forårsaget af nitrater, der stammer fra landbruget
Case C-50/99 Jean-Marie Podestà ν Caisse de retraite par répartition des ingénieurs cadres & assimilés (CRICA) and Others Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to establish within the prescribed period action programmes pursuant to Article 5 of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
Præjudiciel — Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (Første Afdeling) —fortolkning af traktatens artikel 119 (EF-traktatens artikel 117-120 er blevet erstattet af artikel 136 EF - 143 EF) -spørgsmålet, om bestemmelsen omfatter tillægspensionsordninger, som er privatretlige og ikke statsfinansierede — efterladtepension, derydes, efter at ægtefællen er afgået ved døden — pension, som er knyttet til en bestemt pensionsalder
Preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Grande Instance (First Chamber), Paris — Equal treatment — Interpretation of Article 119 of the Treaty (Articles 117 to 120 of the EC Treaty have been replaced by Articles 136 to 143 EC) — Applicability to supplementary retirement pension schemes governed by private law and not financed by the State — Survivor's pension granted following the death of the spouse — Pension linked to the age of retirement
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 20. januar 2000.
Advocate General G. Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 20 January 2000.
Vi erindrer om, at nr. 21/99 og 22/99 af denne publikation indeholder en meddelelse om den nye fremgangsmåde for angivelse af traktatbestemmelser i Domstolens og Rettens tekster.
Readers are reminded that Numbers 21/99 and 22/99 of the Proceedings Bulletin contain a note for information on the new citation of Treaty articles in texts from the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance.
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-292S Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
This bulletin is issued by the Court's Press and Information Division (I -2925 Luxembourg) to provide rapid information on the work of the Court.
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 21.01.2000 Katalognr.: QD-AC-OO-002-DA-C
Original version: French Completed on 7 March 2000 Catalogue No: QD-AC-OO-0002-EN-C
Retten
Case T-256/97
Sag T-256/97 Kontoret for De Europæiske Forbrugerorganisationer (BEUC) / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC) ν Commission of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
Sag C-441/97 Ρ Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl, Thyssen Stahl AG, Preussag Stahl AG og Hoogovens Staal BV / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-441/97 Ρ 25 Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl, Thyssen Stahl AG, Preussag Stahl AG and Hoogovens Staal BV ν Commission of the European Communities
Sag C-l/98 Ρ British Steel Pic / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-l/98 Ρ British Steel Pic ν Commission of the European Communities
Sag C-358/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Irland
Case C-276/97 21 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic
Sag C-359/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Det Forenede Kongerige
Case C-358/97 22 Commission of the European Communities ν Ireland
Sag C-408/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Nederlandene
Case C-359/97 22 Commission of the European Communities ν United Kingdom
Sag C-156/98 14 Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-156/98 23 Federal Republic of Germany ν Commission of the European Communities
Sag C-260/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Hellenske Republik
Case C-260/98 23 Commission of the European Communities ν Hellenic Republic
Præjudiciel »Arbejdskraftenspie bevægelighed —fratrædelsesgodtgørelse — afslag såfremt arbejdstageren opsiger ansættelsesforholdet for at udøve lønnet beskæftigelse i en anden medlemsstat« (Domstolens plenum) arbejdsgiver med påstand om betaling af godtgørelsen, idet han navnlig gjorde gældende, at AngG's § 23, stk. 7, er i strid med traktatens artikel 48.
Preliminary ruling (Freedom of movement for workers — Compensation on termination of employment Refusal where a worker terminates his contract of employment in order to take a job in another Member State) (Full Court)
Ved kendelse af 15. april 1998 har Oberlandesgericht Linz forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EF-traktatens artikel 48 (efter ændring nu artikel 39 EF).
By order of 15 April 1998, the Oberlandesgericht Linz (Higher Regional Court, Linz) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC).
Ved dom af 4. februar 1998 fastslog Landesgericht Wels, at Volker Grafs påstand ikke kunne tages til følge.
claiming from it under Paragraph 23(1). Mr Graf thereupon brought proceedings against his former employer before the Landesgericht Wels (Regional Court, Wels) for payment of that compensation, contending in particular that Paragraph 23(7) of the AngG was contrary to Article 48 of the Treaty.
Oberlandesgericht Linz har derfor besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen et præjudicielt spørgsmål.
Mr Graf appealed against the judgment of the Landesgericht Wels to the Oberlandesgericht Linz.
Spørgsmålet er blevet rejst under en sag anlagt af Volker Graf, som er tysk statsborger, mod Filzmoser Maschinenbau GmbH (herefter »Filzmoser«), som har hjemsted i Wels (Østrig), angående virksomhedens afslag på at udbetale Volker Graf den fratrædelsesgodtgørelse, han hævdede at have krav på i medfør af § 23 i Angestelltengesetz (lov om ansættelsesforhold, herefter »AngG«), da han opsagde ansættelsesforholdet hos Filzmoser for at tage arbejde i Tyskland.
That question was raised in proceedings between Mr Graf, a German national, and Filzmoser Maschinenbau GmbH ('Filzmoser'), whose registered office is in Wels, Austria, concerning the latter's refusal to pay Mr Graf the compensation on termination of employment to which he claimed entitlement under Paragraph 23 of the Angestelltengesetz (Law on Employees; 'the AngG') when he terminated his contract of employment with Filzmoser in order to go and work in Germany.
Ved skrivelse af 29. februar 1996 opsagde Volker Graf sit ansættelsesforhold hos Filzmoser, som havde varet fra den 3. august 1992, for at tage til Tyskland med henblik på at tiltræde en stilling den 1. maj 1996.
The Oberlandesgericht Linz decided to stay proceedings and refer a question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
Under henvisning til AngG's § 23, stk. 7, afslog Filzmoser at betale Volker Graf den fratrædelsesgodtgørelse svarende til to måneders løn, som han gjorde krav på i henhold til bestemmelsens stk. 1.
By letter of 29 February 1996, Mr Graf terminated the contract of employment which he had had with Filzmoser since 3 August 1992, in order to move to Germany and take up new employment in that country from 1 May 1996.
En sådan begivenhed er alt for usikker og indirekte til, at bestemmelser, hvorefter retsvirkningen af en ophævelse af ansættelsesforholdet ikke er den samme, når ansættelsesforholdet ophæves af arbejdstageren selv, som når han ikke har taget initiativ til ophævelsen, eller denne ikke må tilskrives ham, kan antages at udgøre en hindring for arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed.
According to the Court, by its question, the national court essentially asks whether Article 48 of the Treaty precludes national provisions which deny a worker entitlement to compensation on termination of employment if he terminates his contract of employment himself in order to take up employment in another Member State, when those provisions grant him entitlement to such compensation if the contract ends without the
Bestemmelser som de i hovedsagen omtvistede kan ikke forhindre en arbejdstager i eller afholde
Filzmoser refused, on the basis of Paragraph 23(7) of the AngG, to pay Mr Graf the compensation on termination of employment equal to two months' salary which he was
»Tillægsafgift af mælk — ansvar uden for kontraktforhold — erstatningens størrelse og tabets opgørelse«
The Court considered that legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings applies irrespective of the nationality of the worker concerned.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke. Offentliggøres på et senere tidspunkt i denne publikation.
Moreover, legislation of that kind denies compensation on termination of employment to all workers who end their contract of employment themselves in order to take up employment with a new employer, regardless of whether the latter is established in the same Member State as the previous employer or in another Member State.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
In those circumstances, it cannot be maintained that such legislation affects migrant workers to a greater extent than national workers and that it might therefore place at a disadvantage the former in particular.
Generaladvokat A. Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdelinel den 10. december 1998.
Such an event is too uncertain and indirect a possibility for legislation to be capable of being regarded as liable to hinder freedom of movement for workers where it does not attach to termination of a contract of employment by the worker himself the same consequence as it attaches to termination which was not at his initiative or is not attributable to him.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Legislation of the kind at issue in the main
Præjudiciel »Bruxelles-konventionen — artikel 16, nr. 1 -enekompetence i sager om leje eller forpagtning af fast ejendom — anvendelsesområde« (Sjette Afdeling) et præjudicielt spørgsmål om fortolkningen af artikel 16, nr. 1, litra a), i denne konvention.
'Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) does not preclude national provisions which deny a worker entitlement to compensation on termination of employment if he terminates his contract of employment himself in order to take up employment in another Member State, when those provisions grant him entitlement to such compensation if the contract ends without the termination being at his own initiative or attributable to him.'
Ved kendelse af 16. juni 1997 har Landgericht Heilbronn i medfør af protokollen af 3. juni 1971 vedrørende Domstolens fortolkning af konventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgerlige sager, herunder handelssager, forelagt
Advocate General Fennelly delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 16 September 1999.
Spørgsmålet er rejst under en sag anlagt af Dansommer A/S (herefter »Dansommer«), der har hjemsted i Danmark, mod den tyske
He suggested that the Court reply to the question referred by the Oberlandesgericht, Linz, as follows:
Dansommer påtog sig alene rollen som formidler i sin egenskab af professionel rejsearrangør.
(Additional le\y on milk — Non-contractual liability Reparation and assessment of damage) (Sixth Chamber) were not successfully concluded within the period prescribed.
konventionens artikel 16, nr. 1, litra a), er fastsat i sager om leje eller forpagtning af fast ejendom, finder anvendelse på en sag om erstatning for mangelfuld rengøring og beskadigelse af en feriebolig, som en privatperson havde lejet med henblik på nogle ugers ferie, selv når sagen ikke anlægges direkte af ejeren af ejendommen, men af en professionel rejsearrangør, som den pågældende havde lejet boligen af, og som anlægger sagen efter at være indtrådt i ejerens rettigheder.
In their application in Case C-104/89, the applicants claimed damages in the following sums, together with statutory interest at the annual rate of 8% to the date of payment of the compensation due, and without prejudice to any further damage which they might suffer in the future:
Desuden fremgår det af de almindelige kontraktbetingelser, at Dansommer som rejsearrangør i medfør af Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch § 651 k, stk. 3, sikrede tilbagebetalingen af det beløb, Andreas Götz havde betalt, i tilfælde af insolvens hos selskabet.
By interlocutory judgment of 19 May 1992 (hereinafter 'the interlocutory judgment') delivered in the present joined cases, the Court ordered the European Community, represented by the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities, to make good the damage suffered by the applicants as a result of the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 as supplemented by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 in so far as those regulations did not provide for the allocation of a reference quantity to producers who, pursuant to an undertaking given under Council Regulation (EEC) No 1078/77 of 17 May 1977 did not deliver any milk during the reference year adopted by the Member State concerned.
Dette er netop tilfældet i hovedsagen, eftersom den sag, der er anlagt af Dansommer, og som hidrører fra den delvise misligholdelse af en kontrakt om leje af fast ejendom, er baseret på lejerens forpligtelse til at vedligeholde den lejede ejendom og reparere de skader, der er forvoldt.
The Commission, basing its position as far as possible on the individual situation of the applicants for the purposes of determining the quantum of the damage suffered by them, considers that such damage amounts:
Genstanden for den sag, der verserer for den forelæggende ret, har således direkte forbindelse med en lejekontrakt vedrørende en fast ejendom og er følgelig leje eller forpagtning af fast ejendom i konventionens artikel 16, nr. 1, litra a)'s forstand, således at sagen er omfattet af reglen om enekompetence i den nævnte bestemmelse.
The Court ruled that interest at the annual rate of 8% in Case C-104/89 and 7% in Case C-37/90 should be payable on the amounts of compensation as from the date of the interlocutory judgment. For the rest, the applications were dismissed.
Da Landgericht Heilbronn var i tvivl om, hvorvidt den havde kompetence til at pådømme sagen, besluttede den at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen et præjudicielt spørgsmål.
Mr Twijnstra, to in the case of NLG 50 579.15, in the case of NLG 109 675.55, in the case of NLG 120 090.83, in the case of NLG 137 299.20.
Den afgørende begrundelse for at retterne i den kontraherende stat, hvor ejendommen er beliggende, er enekompetente, er, at retten på det sted, hvor den faste ejendom er beliggende, bedst er i stand til at skaffe sig kendskab til de faktiske forhold ved at foretage undersøgelser, forespørgsler og syns- og skønsforretninger på stedet og anvende de gældende retsregler og sædvaner, som normalt er reglerne og sædvanerne i den stat, hvor ejendommen er beliggende.
According to points 4 and 5 of the operative part of the interlocutory judgment, the parties were ordered to inform the Court within twelve months from the date of delivery of that judgment of the amounts of damages payable arrived at by agreement, or, in the absence of agreement, to transmit to the Court within the same period a statement of their views with supporting figures. The costs were reserved.
Ifølge Domstolen må det præjudicielle spørgsmål forstås således, at det nærmere bestemt ønskes fastslået, om den regel om enekompetence, der i
Following delivery of the interlocutory judgment, the parties entered into negotiations with a view to assessing the damage. Those negotiations
Det foran anførte berøres ikke af dommen af 26. februar 1992, sag C-280/90, Hacker).
In his reply, he claimed that the defendant institutions should be ordered to pay the costs.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The Commission has agreed to pay the applicant compensation in the sum of DEM 1 239, but also states, in the alternative, that it is willing to pay compensation in accordance with Regulation No 2187/93.
De accessoriske bestemmelser om afbestillingsforsikring og sikkerhed for det af kunden betalte beløb, som findes i de almindelige betingelser i den kontrakt, der er indgået mellem rejsearrangøren og lejeren, og som ikke er hovedsagens genstand, påvirker ikke kontraktens karakter af leje af fast ejendom i den forstand, hvori udtrykket anvendes i denne bestemmelse i konventionen.«
As is apparent from the interlocutory judgment, the income which the applicants would have obtained from milk deliveries in the normal course of events — that is to say, if their milk production had corresponded to the reference quantities to which they were entitled -- is hypothetical. Consequently, that income cannot, by its very nature, be established by recourse to mean statistical values corresponding — as the interlocutory judgment prescribes to a farm representative of the type of farm run by each of the applicants.
Præjudiciel »Sjette momsdirektiv — transaktioner mellem en selskabsdeltager og selskabet« (Sjette Afdeling)
In Case C-104/89 the body concerned is the Landbouw Economisch Instituut (Agricultural Economics Research Institute, hereinafter 'the LEI') and in Case C-37/90 it is, essentially, the Landwirtschaftskammer Hannover (Hanover Chamber of Agriculture).
Ved dom af 12. november 1997 har Nederlandenes Hoge Raad forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 4, stk. 1, i Rådets sjette direktiv 77/388/EØF af 17. maj 1977.
Β — The principles governing reparation of the damage suffered by the applicants
Spørgsmålet er blevet rejst under en sag mellem J. Heerma og de nederlandske skatte- og afgiftsmyndigheder.
In the present case, however, such an assessment based on individual, factual data runs up against
Sagen drejer sig om, hvorvidt der skal betales merværdiafgift (herefter »moms«) af udlejning af en fast ejendom, der
However, given that both the hypothetical income and the alternative income, determined on the basis of statistical values, reflect only the
tilhører Heerma, til et nederlandsk civilt selskab, som han er deltager i.
required to prove only the different constituent elements and the scope of that loss.