natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen betaler ligeledes omkostningerne iforbindelse med indkaldelsen af vidnerne.« «
Consequently, for further information concerning the scientific work on which the recommendations were based, the applicant was invited to contact the expert designated by the chairman of the High-level Cancer Experts Committee to prepare the file.
Forenede sager T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 og T-69/01 Carmine Salvatore Traili / Den Europæiske Centralbank Tjenestemandsvedtægten
to the working group established for that purpose and whether the meetings of that committee concerning the drawing up of the 1996 recommendations were minuted.
»Tjenestemænd — ansatte ved Den Europæiske Centralbank — forlængelse af prøvetiden — afskedigelse i løbet af prøvetiden —formaliteten — åbenbart urigtigt skøn — begrundelse — sagsomkostninger« (Tredje Afdeling)
By letter of 30 August 2000, the applicant pointed out to the Secretariat-General of the Commission that the time for replying to the confirmatory application had expired the previous day and that, failing an express decision by 7 September 2000, it would bring an action for annulment before the Court of First Instance.
Sag C-174/01 Kommissionen Fællesskaber Luxembourg
In its letter accompanying those documents, the Commission informed the applicant that it would be sending it two further documents as soon as it had obtained the agreement of the authors.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende meddelelse til Kommissionen af en plan for dekontaminering og/eller bortskaffelse af apparater, der er optaget i fortegnelserne, og de heri indeholdte PCB, som krævet i artikel 11 i Rådets direktiv 96/59/EF af 16. september 1996 om bortskaffelse af polychlorbiphenyler og polychlorterphenyler (PCB/PCT)
By letter of 7 September 2000, the Secretary General of the Commission replied that, as regards, first of all, the international scientific research to which the applicant referred and the records of the Commission's review thereof, the research in question had been analysed by the scientific experts who had prepared the 1996 recommendations on the basis of which the Commission had then drafted the proposal for a directive.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdelingl den 25. juni 2002.
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 28 September 2000, the applicant brought the present action.
Præjudiciel — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla La Mancha — fortolkning af artikel 1 i Rådets direktiv 80/987/EØF 20. oktober 1980 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne i tilfælde af arbejdsgiverens insolvens — begrebet »krav, som arbejdstagere i medfør af en arbejdsaftale eller et ansættelsesforhold har erhvervet* — hvorvidt dette omfatter et krav, som er baseret på et forlig (»trámite") indgået under en obligatorisk administrativ forligsprocedure til prøvelse af en afskedigelse — direktivets direkte virkning såfremt spansk lov ikke omfatter denne situation
In those circumstances, at the hearing of 25 October 2001, the Court of First Instance held that there was no longer any need for the witnesses to be heard and set a period of three weeks within which any new documents were to be sent to the applicant and within which the applicants were to inform the Court of their views as to the future conduct of the case. Consequently, the oral procedure was once again suspended.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The parties presented oral argument and answered questions put by the Court at the hearing on 20 June 2001.
Generaladvokat L.A. Geelhoed fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 27. juni 2002.
At that hearing the Court of First Instance decided to summon witnesses in order to ascertain whether, for the purposes of drawing up the 1996 recommendations, documents relating to the international scientific research were first sent to the High-level Cancer Experts Committee and/or
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
On 14 November and 5 December 2001 the Commission sent the applicant further documents, namely:
Sag C-202/01 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
— order the Commission to pay the costs.
Sag C-14/01 Molkerei Wagenfeld Karl Niemann GmbH & Co. KG / Bezirksregierung Hannover Traktatbrudssøgsmål — tilsidesættelse af Rådets direktiv 791409/EØF af 2. april 1979 om beskyttelse af vilde fugle — manglende oprettelse af særligt beskyttede områder på områder, der er de mest egnede til at bevare de arter, som er opført i bilag I til direktivet, og trækfuglearteme; navnlig har sagsøgte ikke oprettet et tilstrækkeligt område på Plaine des Maures som særligt beskyttet område
The Commission contends that the Court should: dismiss the action as inadmissible; in the alternative, dismiss the action as unfounded; the final report of the Finnish Ministry for Social Affairs and Health concerning the 'consensus' conference on tobacco smoking, which was held, under the auspices of the cancer experts committee, in Helsinki on 2 October 1996 and a study entitled 'Cancer, cigarette smoking and premature death in Europe' prepared by Professor Boyle for the committee and the conference (sent on 14 November 2001); order the applicant to pay the costs.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet fSjette Afdeling') den 27. juni 2002.
— a piece of bibliographic research prepared in July 19% by 'Health Promotion Wales' pursuant to a contract concluded with the Commission.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
It asked the Court to give final judgment in the dispute and to order the Commission to bear all of the costs, including those relating to the hearing of 25 October 2001.
Præjudiciel — Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2799/1999 af 17. december 1999 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til forordning (EF) nr. 1255/1999 for så vidt angår ydelse af støtte til skummetmælk og skummetmælkspulver bestemt til foderbrug og salg af sådant skummetmælkspulver — forskelsbehandling (EF-traktatens artikel 40, stk 3 (efter ændring nu artikel 34, stk 2, EF) på grund af bortfald af støtte til skummetmælk, når der opretholdes støtte til skummetmælkspulver — fortolkning af artikel 11 i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1255/1999 af 17 maj 1999 om den fælles markedsordning for mælk og mejeriprodukter — princippet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning
In the present case, the Secretary General's letter of 7 September 2000 indicating, in essence, that the documents requested were not in the Commission's possession or did not exist, amounted to a refusal to grant access and thus affects the applicant's interests.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 27. juni 2002.
By facsimile letter dated 6 June 2002, the applicant applied for measures of organisation of procedure the object of which was to have the Court take account of certain new facts.
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling ( 1 -2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
The argument that the Commission did not refuse access to 'documents falling within the scope of the code of conduct', as adopted by Decision 94/90, cannot alter that conclusion.
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Irrespective of whether or not the Commission was required to grant access to the documents, it nevertheless remains the case that a negative decision was taken and that that decision is actionable.
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
The applicant claims that the Court should:
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 28.6.2002 Katalognr.: QD-AC-02-019-DA-C
The present action must therefore be regarded as admissible.
Ugen 1.-5. juli 2002
Week 1st to 5 July 2002 n° 20/02
Sag C-499/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Spanien Statsstøtte
Case C-499/99 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain State aid
Sag T-179/00 22 A Menarini - Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Frie varebevægelser
Case T-179/00 15 A. Menarini - Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite ν Commission of the European Communities Free movement of goods
Sag C-173/01 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Hellenske Republik Landbrug
Joined Cases C-228/01 and C-289/01 Jacques Bourrasse ν Ministère public Ministère public ν Jean-Marie Perchicot
Sag T-340/99 Arne Mathisen / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Handelspolitik
Case T-340/99 Arne Mathisen ν Council of the European Union Commercial policy
Sag C-97/01 38 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg
Case C-97/01 34 Commission of the European Communities ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Præjudiciel »Vejgodstransport — afgift på motorkøretøjer (Domstolens plenum) har været eneejer af selskabet siden den 13. september 1993.
Preliminary ruling (Transport of goods by road (Full Court) of Luxembourg. Since 13 September 1993, Mr Hoves has been its sole shareholder.
Han var enedirektør i den første tid efter selskabets stiftelse, hvorefter Bettina Jansen-Weber ved notarialdokument af 24. marts 1998 blev optaget som meddirektør.
He was initially the sole manager of the company, then, by notarial act of 24 March 1998, Bettina Jansen-Weber was also appointed as a manager.
De to direktører tegner selskabet i fællesskab.
The two managers are jointly authorised to represent the company.
Andreas Hoves er tillige direktør for det tyske selskab Hoves Speditionsgesellschaft mbH, der har hjemsted i Rhede (Tyskland) (herefter »det tyske GmbH«).
Mr Hoves is also manager of the German company Hoves Speditionsgesellschaft mbH, Rhede (Germany) (hereinafter referred to as 'the GmbH').
Ved kendelse af 23. februar 2000 indgået til Domstolen den 27. marts 2000 har Finanzgericht Münster i medfør af artikel 234 EF forelagt to præjudicieUespørgsmålvedrørendefortolkningen af artikel 6 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3118/93 af 25. oktober 1993 om betingelserne for transportvirksomheders adgang til at udføre intern vejgodstransport i en medlemsstat, hvor de ikke er hjemmehørende, og artikel 5 i Rådets direktiv 93/89/EØF af 25. oktober 1993 om opkrævning i medlemsstaterne af afgifter på visse køretøjer, der anvendes til vejgodstransport, samt af vejafgifter og brugsafgifter for benyttelse af visse infrastrukturer.
By order of 23 February 2000, received at the Court on 27 March 2000, the Finanzgericht Münster (Finance Court, Münster) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC two questions on the interpretation of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93 of 25 October 1993 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road haulage services within a Member State and Article 5 of Council Directive 93/89/EEC of 25 October 1993 on the application by Member States of taxes on certain vehicles used for the carriage of goods by road and tolls and charges for the use of certain infrastructures.
Indtil udgangen af 1995 udførte selskabet kun transport som fragtfører for det tyske GmbH.
Until the end of 1995, it operated solely as a carrier for the GmbH.
Denne virksomhed var skriftligt reguleret ved en kontrakt af 27. januar 1993.
That activity was governed by a written contract of 27 January 1993.
I henhold til kontrakten blev driftsplaner for køretøjer og chauffører udarbejdet af det tyske GmbH.
Under that contract, the operational plans for vehicles and drivers were handled by the GmbH.
Efter udførelsen af transporterne blev mellemværendet med Hoves Sari afregnet ved kreditering af dettes konto.
After freight orders were carried out, the account was settled with the Hoves company by way of a credit entry.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under en sag mellem Andreas Hoves Internationaler Transport-Service Sari (herefter »Hoves Sari«) og Finanzamt Borken om en motorkøretøjsafgift, som sidstnævnte har opkrævet i medfør af tysk ret for lastvogne, som Hoves Sari har registreret i Luxembourg, og som benyttes til cabotagekørsel i Tyskland.
Those questions were raised in a dispute between Andreas Hoves Internationaler Transport-Service Sari ('the Hoves company') and the Finanzamt (Tax Office) Borken concerning a tax on motor vehicles claimed by the latter under German law in respect of lorries registered by Hoves in Luxembourg and carrying out cabotage operations in Germany.
Det fremgår af forelæggelseskendelsen, at Hoves Sari, som blev oprettet i Luxembourg ved stiftelsesoverenskomst af 6. juni 1989, er et luxembourgsk selskab, der er etableret i Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg. Andreas Hoves
The order for reference shows that the Hoves company, formed in Luxembourg by a company agreement of 6 June 1989, is a company under Luxembourg law established in the Grand Duchy
Der var registreret femten lastbiler i Luxembourg i Hoves Sari's navn.
Fifteen lorries were registered in the name of the Hoves company in Luxembourg.
Selskabet betalte den luxembourgske motorkøretøjsafgift for disse køretøjer.
The company paid the Luxembourg tax on motor vehicles in respect of those vehicles.
De luxembourgske myndigheder meddelte selskabet tilladelser til cabotagekørsel i henhold til artikel 5 i forordning nr. 4059/89.
The Luxembourg authorities issued cabotage authorisations to that company in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation No 4059/89.
Selskabet beskæftigede otte chauffører, der alle var bosiddende i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland.
The company employed eight drivers, all living in Germany.
Sagen ved Finanzgericht Münster vedrører afgørelserne og afgiftsansættelserne med hensyn til motorkøretøjsafgiften.
Finanzgericht Münster is directed against those decisions and tax notices concerning motor vehicle tax.
Under en afgiftssag vedrørende årene 1993 og 1994, som er en anden sag end hovedsagen, og som verserede for Finanzgericht Köln (Tyskland), anmodede Bundesamt für Finanzen de luxembourgske myndigheder om retslig og administrativ bistand med henblik på at få fastslået, hvor Hoves Sari's ledelse befandt sig.
In connection with a tax dispute concerning the years 1993 and 1994, separate from the present dispute in the main proceedings and pending before the Finanzgericht Köln (Germany), the Bundesamt für Finanzen asked the Luxembourg authorities for judicial and administrative assistance in order to determine the place of management of the Hoves company.
Ved skrivelse af 12. juli 1996 afgav direction luxembourgeoise des contribution directes en række oplysninger i henhold til Rådets direktiv 77/799/EØF af 19. december 1977 om gensidig bistand mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder inden for området direkte skatter.
By letter of 12 July 1996, on the basis of Council Directive 77/799/EEC of 19 December 1977 concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation, the Luxembourg Direction des Contributions Directes provided a certain amount of information.
Den forelæggende ret har anført, at det sædvanlige stationeringssted i den forstand, hvori dette udtryk anvendes i i StVZO's § 23, stk. 1, som denne bestemmelse fortolkes i retspraksis, er det sted, hvorfra køretøjet direkte benyttes til kørsel på offentlig vej, og hvor det henstilles efter afslutningen af kørslen; i den interregionale godstransport, som i hovedsagen, er dette det sted, hvor der træffes bestemmelse om køretøjets benyttelse til transport, inklusive chaufførernes hviletid.
The national court notes that the regular base for the purposes of Paragraph 23(1) of the StVZO, as interpreted by the case-law, is the place from which the vehicle is directly placed into circulation on the public highway and where it is parked at the end of its journey. In the case of inter-regional transport, as in the main proceedings, it is the place where decisions are taken concerning the use of the vehicle, including the rest time of drivers.
Ifølge den forelæggende ret er køretøjernes sædvanlige stationeringssted i denne sag Rhede.
In this case, in the national court's view, the regular base of the vehicles is in Rhede.
Den forelæggende ret har bemærket, at da køretøjerne har sædvanligt stationeringssted i Tyskland, skal de registreres dér i henhold til § 18 i Strassenverkehrs-Zulassungsordnung (lovom tilladelse til ibrugtagning af motorkøretøjer, herefter »StVZO«).
Having a regular base in Germany, the vehicles should be registered there in accordance with Article 18 of the Strassenverkehrs- Zulassungsordnung (Road Transport Registration Code; the 'StVZO').
Det følger af Kraftfahrzeugsteuergesetz (den tyske lov om afgifter på motorkøretøjer, herefter »KraftStG«), at der skulle svares afgift af motorkøretøjerne i Tyskland, dvs. indtil den 31. december 1994 i medfør af § 1, stk. 1, nr. 2, og fra den 1. januar 1995 i medfør af § 1, stk. 1, nr. 2, andet punktum, andet led, jf. nr. 3 i samme bestemmelse.
Liability to the German tax on motor vehicles arises from Paragraph 1 ( 1 ) (2) of the Kraftfahrzeugsteuergesetz (Law on Motor Vehicle Tax; the 'KraftStG') for the period up to 31 December 1994, and from the second half of the second sentence of Paragraph 1(1)(2) of the KraftStG in conjunction with Paragraph 1(1)(3) thereof as from 1 January 1995.
Der er tale om en retsstridig brug af køretøjerne i henhold til KraftStG's § 2, stk. 5, første punktum.
In the view of the national court, the vehicles have been used unlawfully within the meaning of the first sentence of Paragraph 2(5) of the KraftStG.
Ifølge disse oplysninger, som de er gengivet af den forelæggende ret, havde Hoves Sari hverken eget værksted eller parkeringsplads til sine lastbiler i Luxembourg.
According to that information, as set out by the referring court, the Hoves company did not have either its own garage or parking spaces for the lorries in Luxembourg.
Da virksomheden i Luxembourg i det væsentlige var begrænset til administration af transportforretningerne, og da devæsentligste beslutninger vedrørende selskabet udelukkende blev truffet af Andreas Hoves, der havde bopæl i Tyskland, hvor han for det meste opholdt sig, befandt ledelsen for Hoves Sari sig ikke i Luxembourg, men i Tyskland, således som dette begreb forstås i artikel 3, stk. 6, i overenskomsten af 23. august 1958 mellem Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg og Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland til undgåelse af dobbeltbeskatning og om fastsættelse af regler om gensidig administrativ bistand i forbindelse med indkomst- og formueskat samt erhvervs- og ejendomsskatter, i den ændrede affattelse af 15. juli [skal være juni] 1973.
Since the activity in Luxembourg was essentially restricted to administration of haulage operations and major decisions concerning that company were taken solely by Mr Hoves, who was domiciled in Germany and, for the most part, resided there, the company's place of management within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the Luxembourg/Germany Double Taxation Convention of 23 August 1958, in its amended version of 15 July (read: June) 1973 was not in Luxembourg, but in Germany.
Det var tvivlsomt efter disse oplysninger, om selskabets kontorer i Remich og Esch-sur-Alzette (Luxembourg), udgjorde et fast driftssted i overenskomstens forstand.
However, a clear answer could not be given as to whether the offices in Remich and Esch/Alzette (Luxembourg) were a permanent establishment within the meaning of the Double Taxation Convention.
Det var dog muligt, at der siden den 9. februar 1996 havde været fast driftssted i Bertrange (Luxembourg).
A permanent establishment may have existed in Bertrange (Luxembourg) from 9 February 1996.
Den forelæggende ret er imidlertid i tvivl om, hvorvidt denne retstilstand er forenelig med fællesskabsrettens bestemmelser, navnlig med artikel 6 i forordning nr. 3118/93 og artikel 5 i direktiv 93/89.
The national court has doubts, however, as to the conformity of that legal situation with Community provisions, particularly Article 6 of Regulation No 3118/93 and Article 5 of Directive 93/89.
De tyske skatte- og afgiftsmyndigheder tilsluttede sig de luxembourgske myndigheders opfattelse og lagde til grund, at Hoves Sari's ledelse befandt sig i Rhede.
The Hoves company has its seat in Luxembourg and an establishment there, and the question whether its place of management is there also is irrelevant.
De fastsatte derfor skatte- og afgiftsgrundlaget vedrørende selskabsskat og merværdiafgift for 1989-1995, formueskat for 1992 såvel som lønskat for 1989-1994 efter et skøn.
They held that the seat of management of the Hoves company was in Rhede and they therefore assessed the bases for corporation tax and turnover tax for 1989-1995, capital tax for 1992 and wages tax for 1989-1994.
Der var endnu ikke truffet afgørelse om klagerne over disse beslutninger på tidspunktet for afsigelsen af forelæggelseskendelsen.
The appeals lodged against those assessments were not yet decided at the date the order for reference was pronounced.
Finanzamt Borken fastsatte desuden beskatningsgrundlaget vedrørende
The Finanzamt Borken also assessed the basis of taxation in respect of motor vehicle tax for the vehicles registered in the name of the Hoves company and assessed the motor vehicle tax for periods from 1991 to 1996. The action before the
Den forelæggende ret, Finanzgericht Münster, har fremhævet, at et selskabs hjemsted ifølge Domstolens dom af 9. marts 1999 i Centrossagen (sag C-212/97) skal bestemmes på grundlag af selskabets vedtægter. Hoves Sari har hjemsted og forretningssted i Luxembourg, og det er uden betydning, om dette også er hjemstedet for selskabets ledelse.
Concerning the aim of preventing tax avoidance and excluding the possibility of abuse, the national court points out that the Hoves company has done no more than make use of legal possibilities existing within the European Community, even if it was with the aim of
Hvis dette havde været en betingelse for at drive transportvirksomhed, ville det luxembourgske transportministerium ikke have udstedt tilladelserne hertil.
It points out in that regard that: economising on taxes by paying the tax on motor vehicles in a Member State with an advantageous tax system.
Efter Hoves Sari's opfattelse bør hjemstedet for benyttelsen af et køretøj fastlægges på grundlag af objektive kriterier. Det henviser i så henseende til, at
In the light of those factors, the Finanzgericht Münster decided to stay the proceedings and refer questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
På baggrund af disse omstændigheder har Finanzgericht Münster besluttet at udsætte sagen og at forelægge Domstolen to præjudicielle spørgsmål.
The first question the rest periods of the lorries in Luxembourg were at least as long as those applicable in Germany; the registration and taxation of the vehicles took place in Luxembourg; the technical inspections were carried out in Luxembourg; the vehicles were refuelled mainly in Luxembourg;
Første spørgsmål køretøjerne for størstedelens vedkommende blev benyttet til kørsel i udlandet hviletiden for lastvogne var mindst lige så lang i Luxembourg som i Tyskland
By its first question, the national court essentially asks whether Article 6 of Regulation No 3118/93 precludes national provisions of a host Member State which entail the latter levying vehicle duty in respect of transport of goods by road on the ground that those vehicles have their regular base in the territory of that host Member State, even though they are registered in the Member State of establishment and are used in the host Member State for cabotage by road, in accordance with authorisations lawfully issued by the Member State of establishment.
— registreringen og afgiftsopkrævningen for køretøjer fandt sted i Luxembourg
the lorries were insured in Luxembourg, and the drivers were registered and insured in that Member State;