natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I forhold til en sådan forbruger fremkalder tegnet imidlertid et helhedsindtryk.
The very definition of identity implies that the two elements compared should be the same in all respects.
Gennemsnitsforbrugeren har således kun sjældent mulighed for at foretage en direkte sammenligning mellem tegnene og varemærkerne, men må stole på det ufuldstændige billede, han i erindringen har af dem. Hertil kommer, at opmærksomhedsniveauet kan variere, alt efter hvilken kategori af varer eller tjenesteydelser, der er tale om.
Indeed, the absolute protection in the case of a sign which is identical with the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which the trade mark is registered, which is guaranteed by Article 5(l)(a) of the directive, cannot be extended beyond the situations for which it was envisaged, in particular, to those situations which are more specifically protected by Article 5(l)(b) of the directive.
Når et tegn og et varemærke opfattes som identiske, er dette ikke et resultat af en direkte sammenligning af alle de karakteristiske træk ved de sammenlignede bestanddele, og det er derfor muligt, at ubetydelige forskelle mellem tegnet og varemærket kan blive overset af en gennemsnitsforbruger.
There is therefore identity between the sign and the trade mark where the former reproduces, without any modification or addition, all the elements constituting the latter.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The sign produces an overall impression on such a consumer.
»Artikel 5, stk 1, litra a), i Rådets første direktiv 89/104/EØF af 21. december 1988 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om varemærker skal fortolkes således, at et tegn er identisk med varemærket, såfremt tegnet uden ændring eller tilføjelse reproducerer alle de bestanddele, der udgør varemærket, eller såfremt tegnet, når det betragtes i sin helhed, udviser forskelle, der er så ubetydelige, at de kan blive overset af en gennemsnitsforbruger. «
That consumer only rarely has the chance to make a direct comparison between signs and trade marks and must place his trust in the imperfect picture of them that he has kept in his mind. Moreover, his level of attention is likely to vary according to the category of goods or services in question.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 17. januar 2002.
Since the perception of identity between the sign and the trade mark is not the result of a direct comparison of all the characteristics of the elements compared, insignificant differences between the sign and the trade mark may go unnoticed by an average consumer.
»Begrebet identitet mellem et varemærke og et tegn i artikel 5, stk. 1, litra a), i Rådets første direktiv 89/104/EØF af 21. december 1988 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om varemærker omfatter identisk reproduktion uden nogen tilføjelse, udeladelse eller ændring, bortset fra af minimal eller helt uvæsentlig betydning.
'Article 5(l)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that a sign is identical with the trade mark where it reproduces, without any modification or addition, aü the elements constituting the trade mark or where, viewed as a whole, it contains differences so insignificant that they may go unnoticed by an average consumer.'
vil blive opfattet som ens, idet eventuelle forskelle er minimale eller helt uvæsentlige, eller om de snarere vil blive opfattet som tegn, der ligner hinanden, idet forskellene er større end som så.«
In reaching its decision in such cases, the national court must first identify what is perceived by the average, reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect consumer as the relevant mark and sign, then assess globally the visual, aural and other sensory or conceptual features of the mark and sign in question and the overall impression created by them, in particular by their distinctive and dominant components, in order to determine whether the two would be perceived by such a consumer as the same in the sense that any differences are minute or wholly insignificant, or whether the two would be perceived rather as similar in the sense that the differences are greater than that.'
Forenede sager T-188/01, T-189/01 og T-190/01 Vassilios Tsarnavas / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tj enestemandsvedtægten
Joined Cases T-188/01, T-189/01 and T-190/01 Vassilios Tsarnavas ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — formaliteten — forfremmelse — sammenligning af fortjenester mellem tjenestemænd i forskellige afdelinger« (Første Afdeling)
(Officials —Admissibility—Promotion — Consideration of comparative merits of officials from different services) (First Chamber)
»Konkurrence — aftale mellem medlemmer af en linjekonference og uafhængige rederier — fragttillæg — hjemmel —forordning (EØF) nr. 4056/86 —forordning (EØF) nr. 1017/68 — det relevante marked — bevis for overtrædelsen — forældelse — bøde« (Tredje Afdeling)
(Competition —Agreement between members of a liner conference and independent shipping companies — Charges and surcharges — Legal basis — Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 — Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68 — Relevant market — Proof of infringement — Limitation period — Fine) (Third Chamber)
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
It was not notified to the Commission.
Sag T-273/01 Innova Privat-Akademie GmbH / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Forbindelserne udadtil
the use of a common mechanism for the calculation and setting of charges and surcharges other than sea freight and inland haulage.
— projekt med henblik på stiftelse af et blandet selskab i Indien — manglende finansiering — erstatningssøgsmål«
The charges and surcharges covered by the FETTCSA supplement the sea freight charges which shipping lines charge shippers to cover certain costs, including those arising from exchange rate fluctuations or changes in fuel prices and the handling of containerised cargo at ports or terminals.
»ECIP-programmet erhvervsuddannelse (Tredje Afdeling)
It is agreed between the parties to the dispute that the charges and surcharges constitute a substantial part of the total rate for sea freight and may be up to 60% of that amount on the eastbound trade.
Den 10. december 1998 indgav Innova Privat-Akademie GmbH via finansieringsinstituttet Berliner Bank c/o Landesbank Berlin (herefter »banken«) en ansøgning til Kommissionen om tilskud med henblik på finansiering af et projekt inden for rammerne af det finansielle instrument »EC Investment Partners« (ECIP).
On 25 March 1991, the secretariat of the FEFC informed the Commission that an agreement in principle 'for a common mechanism for the calculation and setting of charges and surcharges other than sea freight and inland haulage' had been reached on 5 March 1991.
Det pågældende projekt bestod af en feasibility-undersøgelse med henblik på stiftelse af et blandet selskab vedrørende erhvervsuddannelse i Indien.
On 15 July 1991, the European Shippers' Council ('ESC') made a formal complaint to the Commission regarding the FETTCSA agreement.
Ved telefax af 5. januar 1999 fra ECIP's tekniske serviceafdeling til banken anerkendte Kommissionen modtagelsen af ansøgningen. Denne telefax angav udtrykkeligt, at den ikke var en tilladelse, og at vurderingen af projektet ville ske efterfølgende.
On 28 September 1992, the Commission informed the FETTCSA secretariat of its preliminary legal assessment of the FETTCSA agreement of 5 March 1991.
Sagsøgeren fik modtagelseskvitteringen via banken.
It therefore suggested to the FETTCSA parties that they notify the agreement under Article 12 of Regulation No 4056/86.
Ved telefax af 18. januar 1999 oplyste banken sagsøgeren om, at fra den 5. januar 1999 ville alle omkostninger afholdt i forbindelse med feasibilityundersøgelsen være støtteberettigede udgifter i henhold til den indgivne ansøgning om tilskud.
On 19 April 1994, the Commission sent a statement of objections to the FETTCSA parties in which it concluded that the agreement could not be regarded as a technical agreement within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation No 4056/86 and Article 3 of Regulation No 1017/68 and that it infringed Article 81(1) EC and Article 2 of Regulation No 1017/68 in that it contained the following agreements in restraint of trade: an agreement prohibiting discounts, an agreement on currency exchange rates, an agreement concerning the calculation of charges and surcharges and an agreement for the exchange of information.
Ved telefax af 31. marts 1999 meddelte banken ansøgeren, at ansøgningen om tilskud vedrørende feasibilityundersøgelsen var blevet godkendt for et beløb på 115 328 EUR.
The Commission also concluded in its statement of objections that those agreements in restraint of trade were not eligible for block exemption under Article 3 of Regulation No 4056/86, or individual exemption under Article 81(3) EC or Article 5 of Regulation No 1017/68.
»Denne oplysning gives med forbehold for, at projektet formelt godkendes af Kommissionen, og som følge heraf er denne skrivelse ikke et tilsagn fra Kommissionen.
On 8 August 1995, the Commission informed the FETTCSA parties' representative that, because the FETTCSA parties continued to hold differing views as to the facts of the case, it intended to adopt a formal decision.
Kommissionens formelle afgørelse vil blive tilsendt Dem snarest muligt og vil i givet fald være ledsaget af et kontraktdokument, som De skal underskrive.«
In that context, the Commission asked the FETTCSA parties' representative whether the FETTCSA parties would accept the facts in the allegations made against them.
Da Kommissionen i mellemtiden havde besluttet at foretage en tilbundsgående undersøgelse af det finansielle instrument ECIP og ikke foreslå en forlængelse af programmet ud over den udløbsdato, der var fastsat i ECIP-forordningen, ophørte den med at underskrive nye finansieringsaftaler inden for rammerne af ECIP.
It is common ground that, after that last request by the Commission, no further written correspondence was exchanged between the Commission and the FETTCSA parties before 30 June 1998, when the Commission sent the FETTCSA parties' representative a further request for information as to the turnover figures of those parties for 1997.
Ved skrivelse af 14. april 2000 underrettede Kommissionen banken om sin beslutning om at ophøre med at underskrive nye finansieringsaftaler inden for rammerne af ECIP.
On 11 October 1999, the Commission sent to the FETTCSA parties' representative a request for information as to the turnover figures for those parties for 1998.
Sagsøgeren havde den 25. november 1998 indgået en aftale med et konsulentfirma, Berka Investment Consulting Ltd (herefter »Berka«), vedrørende feasibility-undersøgelsen. Undersøgelsen skulle påbegyndes
On 16 May 2000 the Commission adopted, on the basis of Regulation No 17, Regulation No 1017/68 and Regulation No 4056/86, Decision 2000/627/EC relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (IV/34.018 - Far East Trade Tariff Charges and Surcharges Agreement (FETTCSA)) (the decision' or the contested decision').
På grundlag af denne kontrakt anlagde Berka i maj 2000 sag mod sagsøgeren for de nationale domstole med påstand om betaling af 111 881,46 DEM.
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 11 August 2000, the applicants brought the present action for annulment.
Den 15. februar 2002 frifandt Landgericht Berlin sagsøgeren for Berkas påstande.
The applicants put forward six pleas in law in support of their application.
Ved dom af 12. april 2002 gav Landgericht Berlin sagsøgeren medhold i modkravet.
The fifth concerns the limitation period and the last alleges infringement of the duty to state reasons for certain points arising in the other pleas.
Kommissionen tilpligtes at betale sagsøgeren 78 172,39 DEM med tillæg af renter.
It follows that each of the basic amounts for the applicants is, in turn, vitiated by failure to state reasons.
Uden at det er fornødent at tage stilling til, om bankens handlinger eventuelt kan tilskrives Kommissionen, bemærkes blot, at telefaxen af den 26. august 1999 alene er en foreløbig underretning om resultatet af den undersøgelse, styringskomiteen havde foretaget.
In those circumstances, since the Commission had concluded its examination of the file when the request for information of 24 March 1995 was sent and it did not take any step in the investigation before sending the requests for information of 30 June 1998 and 11 October 1999, those requests for information were not necessary for the conduct of the investigation and they did not therefore validly interrupt the limitation period.
De i denne telefax anførte oplysninger blev fremsendt under udtrykkeligt forbehold for Kommissionens endelige beslutning, og telefaxen angiver udtrykkeligt, at den ikke indeholder et tilsagn fra Kommissionen.
Consequently, Article 4 of the contested decision must be annulled in so far as it imposes fines, since they were imposed on 16 May 2000, after the five-year limitation period laid down by Articles l(l)(b) and 2(1) and (3) of Regulation No 2988/74, which started to run anew with effect from 24 March 1995, had expired.
Sagsøgeren betaler sagens omkostninger.«
Dismisses the remainder of the action;
Sag C-331/01 Kongeriget Spanien / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of the applicants' costs;
Generaladvokat C. Stix-Hackl fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Første Afdeling*) den 20. marts 2003.
Orders the applicants to bear half of their own costs.'
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Orders the applicant to pay the costs.'
Præjudiciel — Corte suprema di cassazione — etableringsret — erhvervet som advokat — betingelser for adgang til og udøvelse heraf—fransk statsborger medjuridisk kandidateksamen fra Frankrig, som er bosat i Italien — betingelser for at blive optaget på listen over advokatfuldmægtige
Direct action — Partial annulment of 2001/557/EC: Commission Decision of 11 July 2001 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund — Expenditure under Council Regulation (EC) No 1357196 of 8 July 1996 providingfor additional payments to be made in 1996 — Tardiness of the decision of the Commission (Ankle 7(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999)
Generaladvokat C. Stix-Hackl fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Femte Afdeling') den 20. marts 2003.
Advocate General C. Stix-Hackl delivered her Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 20 March 2003.
Præjudiciel — Guidice di pace di Genova — lovligheden, efter proportionalitetsprincippet og princippet om en effektiv, passende retsbeskyttelse, af nationale bestemmelser om administrative overtrædelser, hvorefter borgerne kun kan anfægte en beslaglæggelsesforanstaltning efter den pågældende forvaltnings udstedelse af en beslaglæggelsesbeslutning — ingen bestemmelse, der gør det muligt for personer, der er berørt af en forvaltningsakt, der er vedtaget overfor en anden person, at intervenere som tredjemand i klageprocedurer eller en retssag — bestemmelse om en sanktion i tilslutning til den økonomiske sanktion, der går ud på obligatorisk beslaglæggelse af varen — medlemsstaternes forpligtelse i tiden forud for gennemførelsen af et direktiv og efter udløbet af gennemførelsesfristen — Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 1999/5/EF af 9. marts 1999 om radio- og teleterminaludstyr samt gensidig anerkendelse af udstyrets overensstemmelse
Interpretation of Article 10 EC and point 3 of the operative pan of the judgment in Case C-437/97 (temporal limitation of the effects of the Court's interpretation of Article 3(2) of Directive 92I12IEC) — National legislation excluding repayment of a duty (incompatible with Community law) which the person concerned passed on to a third party — Retroactive application of such legislation adding an additional restriction to that imposed by the Court of Justice
Generaladvokat C. Stix-Hackl fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 20. marts 2003.
it complies with the principles of equivalence (it must not be less favourable than the rules governing reimbursement in comparable purely domestic situations) and effectiveness (it must not render in practice impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law).
Præjudiciel — Cour de cassation — fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 30 (nu artikel 28 EF) — national lovgivning hvorefter toldmyndighederne har mulighed for at tilbageholde varer, der mistænkes for at være forfalskninger — transitvarer med oprindelse i en anden medlemsstat, hvor de er fremstillet lovligt, der skal markedsføres i et tredjeland — løse dele til biler
Freedom of establishment — legalprofession - conditions for access to and exercise of— French national holding a French maîtrise en droit and residing in Italy — conditions for enrolment in the professional register oflawyers lawyers
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 20. marts 2003.
Advocate General C. Stix-Hackl delivered her Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 20 March 2003.
Appel af dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Fjerde Udvidede Afdeling) den 12. juli 2001 i sag T-120/99, Kik mod KHIM, hvorved Retten afviste at annullere en ansøgning om varemærkeregistrering under henvisning til, at ansøgningen ikke indeholdt en angivelse af et »andet sprog« — gyldigheden af artikel 115 i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 40/94 af 20. december 1993 om EF-varemærker — sprogordning ved KHIM og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling
Preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Genova — Compatibility with the principles of proportionality and the right to effective legal protection of national rules on administrative infringement which allow individuals to challenge seizures only after the administrative authority concerned has issued the order for seizure — Absence of provision authorisingpersons concerned by an administrative measure adopted with regard to another party to intervene in court proceedings — Provision for a penalty additional to the pecuniary penalty and consisting in the confiscation of goods — Obligations of Member States during the period for transposing a directive and after the expiry of that period — Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Appeal against the judgment in Case T-l20/99 in which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment of a decision rejecting an application for registration of a Community trade mark on the ground that it did not indicate a choice of a 'second language' — validity of Article 115 of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark — the rules governing languages of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and the principle of equal treatment
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 20 March 2003.
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 16.7.2003 Katalognr.: QD-AC-03-OlO-DA-C
Original version: French Completed on 16.07.2003 Catalogue No: QD-AC-03-OlO-EN-C
Sag C-277/01 Ρ Europa-Parlamentet Ignacio Samper Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case C-277/01 Ρ European Parliament ν Ignacio Samper Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag T-114/02 BaByliss SA / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Konkurrence
Case T-114/02 BaByliss SA ν Commission of the European Communities Competition
Sag C-l/02 SA Antippas / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Privilegier og immuniteter
Case C-l/02 SA Antippas ν Commission of the European Communities Privileges and immunities
Sag C-75/02 Ρ Diputación Foral de Alava m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Statsstøtte
Case C-75/02 Ρ Diputación Foral de Alava and Others ν Commission of the European Communities State aid
Sag T-243/02 J / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-243/02 J ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag C-330/01 Ρ Hortiplant S.A.T. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-330/01 Ρ Hortiplant S.A.T. ν Commission of the European Communities
Præjudiciel •Miljø - affald -forordning (EØF) nr. 259/93 - direktiv 7514421EØF - affaldsbehandling i flere etaper anvendelse af affald som brændsel i cementindustrien og anvendelse af restprodukter fra affaldsforbrænding som råstof ved fremstilling af cement klassificering som nyttiggørelsesoperation eller bortskaffelsesoperation — begrebet hovedanvendelse som brændsel eller andre midler til energifremstilling* (Femte Afdeling)
Preliminary ruling (Environment — Waste — Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 — Directive 7514421EEC — Treatment of waste in several stages — Use of waste as fuel in the cement industry and use of incineration residues as raw material in cement manufacture — Classification as a recovery operation or as a disposal operation — Concept of the use of waste principally as a fuel or other means to generate energy) (Fifth Chamber)
Ved dom af 13. marts 2001 har Raad van State forelagt Domstolen fire præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 75/442/EØF af 15. juli 1975 om affald (herefter »affaldsdirektivet«).
By judgment of 13 March 2001 the Raad van State (Netherlands Council of State) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling four questions on the interpretation of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste (hereinafter 'the Directive1).
Tvisten i hovedsagen og de præjudicielle spørgsmål
Main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
SITA er nederlandsk selskab i Maastricht (Nederlandene), som beskæftiger sig med indsamling og forarbejdning af affald (farligt og ufarligt affald).
SITA is a company governed by Netherlands law established in Maastricht (Netherlands), which carries out the collection and processing of hazardous and non-hazardous waste.
Den 23. december 1997 og den 6. januar 1998 anmeldte SITA to påtænkte affaldsoverførsler til ministeren som kompetent afsendelsesmyndighed i henhold til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 259/93 af 1. februar 1993 om overvågning af og kontrol med overførsel af affald inden for, til og fra Det Europæiske Fællesskab (herefter »forordningen«).
On 23 December 1997 and on 6 January 1998, SITA notified the Minister, as the competent authority of dispatch within the meaning of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community (hereinafter 'the Regulation'), of two planned shipments of waste.
Den første anmeldelse (NL 90201) vedrørte en påtænkt overførsel til virksomheden STPI i Engis (Belgien) i perioden fra den 1. februar 1998 til den 31. januar 1999 af 2 OCX) tons fast blanding af lim-, kit-, harpiksog farveaffald og siliciumholdigt affald blandet med savsmuld.
The first notification (NL 90201) concerned a plan to ship 2 000 tonnes of a compact mixture of waste glue, sealant, resin and paint, as well as waste containing silicon mixed with sawdust, to the undertaking STPI, established in Engis (Belgium), between 1 February 1998 and 31 January 1999.
Den anden anmeldelse (NL 90204) vedrørte en påtænkt overførsel til den samme virksomhed i samme periode af 1 000 tons organiske og uorganiske halogenfattige sedimenter blandet med savsmuld.
The second notification (NL 90204) concerned a plan to ship 1 000 tonnes of organic and inorganic sediments with a low halogen content, mixed with sawdust, to the same undertaking, during that same period.