natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En frellesskabsborger, som arbejder i en anden medlemsstat endhjemstaten, mister nemlig ikke sin egenskab af arbejCstager i den i traktatensartikel 48, stk. 1, forudsattebetydning, fordi han bekhder en stilling i eninternational organisation, selv hvis betingelserne for hans indrejseog hansophold i beskeftigelseslandetsrerligt er reguleret af en internationalkonvention.
The Court thenacknowledged that a high-ranking athlete's participation in an internationalcompetition is capable of involving the provision of a number of separate, butclosely related, services which may fall within the scope of those provisions evenif some of the services are not paid for by those for whom they are performed.However, in contrast to the rules applicable in the Bosman case, the selectionrules at issue here do not determine the conditions governing access to the labourmarket by professional sportsmen and do not contain nationality clauses limitingthe number of nationals of other Member States who may participate in acompetition.
Traktatens artikel 6, stk. 1 (efter rndring nu artikel 12, stk. 1,EF) finder ogsä anvendelse i tilfrelde, hvor en gruppe eller organisation säsomden pägreldende sammenslutning har visse befojelser over for private og kanpälegge dem vilkär, som skader udovelsen af de grundhggende friheder, somer sikret ved traktaten.
These rules concern a tournament in which, once selected, theathletes compete on their own account, irrespectiveof their nationality.
Kriteriet om tilslutning til den nationalesygesikringsordning, som er grundlag for forskellen i tarifferne for hge- oghospitalsbehandling, udgor en indirekte forskelsbehandling pä grund afnationalitet.
Althoughsuch selection rules inevitably have the effect of limiting the number ofparticipants in a tournament, a limitation of that kind is inherent in theorganisation of an internationalhigh-level sports event, which necessarily involvescertain selection rules or criteria being adopted.
For det forste er en stor del af de personer, som er tilsluttet Frellesskabernes og ikke den nationale sygesikringsordning, og som modtagerkge- og hospitalsbehandling pä det nationale omräde, statsborgere fra andiemedlemsstater.
Such rules cannot therefore beregarded as constituting a restriction on the freedom to provide services prohibitedby the Treaty.
For det andet er langt stsrstedelen af de nationale statsborgere,som er bosat der, omfattet af den nationale sygesikringsordning. Desuden erden vrsentlige forskel nred hensyn til fastsrettelsen af tarifferne forlregebehandling i forbindelse med moderskab,som grelder i behandlingen af
In Case C-58i98 Corsten fiudgment of 3 October 2000) the Court held that Article 59 of the Treaty precludes rules of a Member State which make the carrying out on its territory of skilled trade work by providers of servicesestablished in other Member States subject to an authorisation procedure which is likely to delay or complicate exercise of the right to freedom to provideservices, where examination of the conditions governing access to the activities
Sporgsmäletopstod med hensyn til en person, som pätidspunktet for barnets fsdsel havde status som grensearbejder medbeskeftigelse i den medlemsstat, den pägreldende institution henhsrte under,men boprel i den anden medlemsstat.Dornstolen fastslog, at en benegtendebesvarelse af sporgsmälet ville v & re til skade for frellesskabsborgere, der harudsvet deres ret til at frerdesog opholde sig frit i medlemsstaterne, som ersikret i EF-traktatens artikel 8 A (efter rendring nu artikel 18 EF).
The Court ruled that, in such a situation, thoseauthorities must take into consideration all the diplomas, certificates and otherevidence of formal qualifications of the person concerned and his relevantexperience, by comparing the specialisedknowledge and abilities certified bythose qualifications and that experience with the knowledge and qualificationsrequired by the national rules.
Denbemerkede endvidere, at en rekke bestemmelser i forordning nr. 140817L,som vedrsrer denne situation, ikke blot medvirker til at sikre arbejdskraftensfrie bevegelighed, men ogsä unionsborgernesfrie bevregelighed inden for Fellesskabet i medfsr af traktatens artikel 8 A. Under disse omstrendighederbesvarede Domstolen det rejste sporgsmäl bekrreftende ved en direktefortolkning af EF-traktatens bestemmelser.
Such an interpretation of Article 52 of the Treatyis merely the expressionby the Court of a principle which is inherent in thefundamental freedoms of the Treaty and remains relevant in situationsnot coveredby directives relating to the mutual recognition of diplomas.
En rrekke vigtige domme vedrsrte denfri udveksling af tienesteydelserinden for Fellesskabet. Man vil navnlig erindre sagerneDeliöge og Corsten.
Practice of the profession of lawyer gave rise to the important judgmentdelivered on7 November 2000 in Case C-168/98 Luxembourg v Parliament and Council, in which the Court dismissed the action brought by the Grand Duchy of
Den vigtige dom, der blev afsagt af Domstolen den 11. april 2000 (Deliöge,forenede sager C-51196 og C-101/97,Sml. I, s. 2549), gjorde det muligt for Domstolen at prrecisere rrekkevidden af Bosman-dommen (dom af 15 .L2.1995,sag C-415193,Sml. l, s. 4921).
Luxembourg for annulment of a directive to facilitate practice of the professionof lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which thequalification was obtained (Directive 98l5lEC).
Sagen drejedesig om regler, hvorefter detkrreves, at judokrempere,der er professionelle eller halvprofessionelle elleraspirerer til en status som professionelle eller halvprofessionelle,skal have entilladelse fra eller v & re blevet udtagetaf deres nationale forbund for at kunnedeltage i en international sportsturnering pä hojt plan, hvor det ikke erlandshold, der konkurrerer. Navnlig under henvisning til Bosmann-dommen
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg contended in particular that the directive infringes the secondparagraphof Article 52 of the Treaty in that it introducesa difference in treatmentbetween nationals and migrants and prejudicesthe public interest in consumerprotection and in the proper administration of justice.
bemaerkede Domstolen, at traktatens bestemmelser om fri udveksling aftjenesteydelser kan finde anvendelse pä sportslig virksomhed og regler udstedtaf sportsforbund som de omhandlede udtagelsesregler.
of nondiscrimination laid down by Article 52 of the Treaty, since the situationof a migrant lawyer practising under his home-countrytitle and the situation of a lawyer practising under the professional title of the host Member State are notcomparable.
Bestemmelserne greldernemlig ikke alene for offentlige myndigheders retsakter, men tillige for andreformer for regler, hvis formäl er at give kollektive bestemmelser forlonarbejde og tjenesteydelser.
Unlike the latter, the former may be forbidden to pursue certain activities and, with regard to the representation or defence of clients in legalproceedings, may be subject to certain obligations, as follows from the provisions of Directive 98/5.
En eliteidretsudsvers deltagelse i eninternational turnering pä hojt plan kan indebere, at der praesteres flereforskellige, men taetsarnmenflettede tjenesteydelser, som kan falde ind underdisse bestemmelser, selv om der ikke betalesfor visse af disse ydelser af dem,der modtager ydelserne.
In adopting that directive with a view to making it easier fora particular class of migrant lawyers to exercise the fundamental freedom ofestablishment, the Community legislature chose, in preference to a system of apriori testingof qualification in the national law of the host Member State, a planof action combining consumer information, restrictions on the extent to which orthe detailed rules under which certain activities of the profession may bepractised, a number of applicable rules of professional conduct, compulsoryinsurance, as well as a system of discipline involving both the competentauthorities of the home Member State and the host State.
I modsetning til de regler, der fandt anvendelse i Bosman-dommen, fastlregger de omhandlede udtagelsesregler imidlertid ikkebetingelserne for professionelle sportsudoveres adgang til arbejdsmarkedet, ogde indeholder ikke udlrendingeklausuler, der begranser antallet af statsborgerefra andre medlemsstater, der kan deltage i en turnering.
The legislature has notabolished the requirement that the lawyer concerned should know the national lawapplicable in the cases he handles, but has simply released him from theobligation to prove that knowledge in advance.
Reglerne vedrsrer enturnering, hvor sportsudoverne, efter at de er blevet udtaget, deltager pä egnevegne uden hensyn til nationalitet.Sädanne udtagelsesregler medfsrer ganskevist uundgäeligten begrrensning af antallet af deltagere i en turnering,men ensädan begrrensning er et naturligt led i afuiklingen af en internationalsportsturnering pä hojt plan, som nsdvendigvisforudsetter, at der vedtagesvisse regler eller udtagelseskriterier.
It has thus allowed, in somecircumstances, gradual assimilation of knowledge through practice, thatassimilation being made easierby experience of other laws gained in the home Member State. The legislature was also able to take account of the dissuasiveeffect of the system of discipline and the rules of professional liability.
De kan derfor ikke i sig selv betragtessom en hindring for den fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser, som er forbudt ihenhold til traktaten.
In makingsuch a choice of the method and level of consumer protection and of ensuring theproper administration of justice, the Community legislature did not overstep thelimits of the discretion available to it for the purpose of determining an acceptablelevel of protection of the public interest.
I Corsten-sagen(domaf 3.10.2000,sag C-58/98, endnuikke trykt i Samlingaf Afgorelser) kendte Domstolen for ret, at traktatens artikel 59 er til hinderfor en lovgivning i en medlemsstat, hvorefter udsvelsen afhändvrerksvirksomhed pä dens omräde af tjenesteydereetableret i andremedlemsstater - när der i henhold til det greldende direktiv er foretaget enundersogelse af betingelserne for at fä adgang til eller udsve den pägeldendevirksomhed, og det er blevet fastsläet, at disse er opfyldt - er undergivet enaf vrertslandet indfsrt procedure for meddelelse af tilladelse, som kan fsre til,at leveringenaf tjenesteydelser i denne stat fra en person, som er etableret ien anden medlemsstat,forsinkes eller vanskeliggores.Endvidere mä eteventuelt krav om optagelse i vertslandetshändvrerksregister, selv om det kanv & re begrundet i det tvingende almene hensyn at sikre kvaliteten af dethändverksarbejde, der udfsres, og at beskytte kunderne, hverken medfsreyderligere administrative omkostninger eller udlsse bidragspligt tilhändv erkerforeninsen.
In addition, contrary to the submissionsadvanced by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Directive 9815 was validlyadopted by a qualified majority in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 251 EC) and on thebasisof Article 57(l) and the first and third sentences of Article 57(2) of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 47(1) EC and the first and third sentencesof Article 47(2) EC). The directive establishes a mechanism for the mutualrecognitionof the professionaltitles of migrant lawyers who wish to practiseunder their home-country professional title, supplementing the mechanism alreadyin force, which, as regards lawyers, is intended to authorise the unrestrictedpractice of the profession under the professional title of the host Member State.Consequently, Directive 9815 does not make any amendment to existing principleslaid down by law governing the professions within the meaning of the secondsentence of Article 57(2) of the Treaty, which would have required it to be adopted unanimously.
Med hensyn til udsvelse af lregegerning havde Domstoleni Hocsman-sagen (dom af 14 .9 .2000, sag C-238198,endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser) lejlighed til at precisere, hvilke forpligtelser der pähviler dekompetente myndigheder i en medlemsstat i medfsr af traktatens artikel 52,när en fellesskabsstatsborger i en situation, som ikke er reguleret i et direktivom gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser, indgiver en ansogning omtilladelse til at udsve et erhverv, hvortil adgangen ifolge national ret erbetinget af, at ansogeren har et eksamensbevis eller erhvervsmressigekvalifikationer eller perioder med erhvervserfaring.
Case C-54199Eglise de Scientologie(udgment of 14 March 2000) concerned Article 73d(1xb) of the Treaty (now Article 58(1Xb)EC), under which the Member States may derogate from the prohibition on all restrictions on themovement of capital which is laid down and take measures which are justified ongrounds of public policy or public security.
Domstolen fast s lo E , atmyndighederne i en sädan situation er forpligtet til at tage hensyn til samtligeeksamensbeviser, certifikater og andre kvatifikationsbeviser, herunderanssgerens relevante erfaring, idet de skal foretage en salnmenligning mellempä den ene side den kompetence, der er dokumenteret ved dissekvalifikationsbeviser og denne erfaring, og pä den anden side de krav omkundskaber og kvalifikationer, der stilles ifolge national ret.
The Court held that this provisionprecludes a system of prior authorisation for direct foreign investments whichconfines itself to defining in general terms the affected investmentsas beinginvestments that are such as to represent a threat to public policy and publicsecurity, with the result that the persons concerned are unable to ascertain thespecific circumstances in which prior authorisation is required.
En sädanfortolkning af traktatens artikel 52 er blot udtryk for udmsntningen iretspraksis af et princip, som hsrer til de grundleggendefriheder i traktaten,og som fortsat har en klar betydning i de tilfelde, som ikke er omfattet afdirektiverne om gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser.
Such lack ofprecision does not enable individuals to be apprisedof the extent of their rightsand obligations deriving from the Treaty and is contrary to the principle of legalcertainty.
StorhertugdommetLuxembourg havde navnlig gjort greldende, at direktivet var i strid medtraktatens artikel 52, stk. 2, da det indebar en forskelsbehandling mellemindlrendinge og vandrende personer og ikke tilgodesä almene hensyn, nemligbeskyttelse af forbrugerne og en ordnet retspleje.
The position would be different only if it could bedemonstrated to the competent national court that, in a particular atea, nondiscriminatory treatment of nationals of all the Member States would expose themilitary interests of the Member State concerned to real, specific and serious riskswhich could not be counteredby less restrictive procedures.
Domstolen fastslog, atfellesskabslovgiver ikke ved vedtagelsen af direktiv 9815 havde tilsidesatforbuddet mod forskelsbehandling i traktatens artikel 52, da en vandrendeadvokat, der udsver virksomhed under hjemlandets advokattitel, og enadvokat, der udsver virksomhed under vrertslandets advokattitel, ikke befindersig i sammenligneligesituationer.
In Case C-35198 Verkooijen fiudgment of 6 June 2000), the Court held that Directive 88/361/EEC for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty t4 precludes a legislative provision of a Member State under which the grant ofexemption from income tax payable on dividends that are paid to natural persons who are shareholdersis subject to the condition that those dividends are paid bya company whose seat is in that Member State. A legislative provision of that
indfsre et system med forudgäende kontrol af kendskabet til vrertslandetsnationale retssystem, foretrukket en ordning, der indeholder en kombinationaf flere elementer, nemlig information af forbrugerne, begrrensninger iudstrekningen af eller betingelserne for udsvelsen af visse omräder aferhvervet, samtidig overholdelse af de faglige og etiskeregler i mere end 6tland, en forpligtelse til at tegne forsikring samt en disciplinrerordning, hvoromhjemlandet og vertslandets kompetente myndighed samarbejder.Fellesskabslovgiver har ikke ophrevet forpligtelsen til at besidde kendskab tilden nationale ret, som finder anvendelse i de sager, den pägreldende advokatovertager, men har kun fritaget denne for pä forhänd at skulle godtgorekendskabet hertil.
kind has the effect of dissuadingCommunity nationals residing in the MemberState concerned from investing their capital in companies which have their seatin another Member State and also has a restrictive effect as regards suchcompanies in that it constitutes an obstacleto the raising of capital in the MemberState concerned, without the restriction being justified by an overriding reason inthe public interest such as the need to ensure the cohesion of the tax system.
Herved har frellesskabslovgiver anerkendt, at et sädantkendskab i givet fald kan erhvervesgradvis i kraft af praksis, idet kendskabet hertil lettesved den erfaring, den pägreldende i hjemlandet har erhvervet siginden for andre retsomräder.
In Case C-251198Baars (udgment of 13 April 2000), the Court appliedprinciples similar to those identified in Verkooijen, this time in relation to Article 52 of the Treaty.
Endvidere er direktiv 9815 i modsetning til, hvad Storhertugdommet Luxembourg havde gjort geldende - gyldigt vedtaget med kvalificeret flertal efter fremgangsmäden i traktatens artikel 189 B (efterrendringnu artikel25I EF) og pä grundlag af traktatens artikel 57, stk. 1, ogstk.
In this case the Court found that, by twice raising the tolls for vehicles with morethan three axles using the whole Brennermotorway, the Republic of Austria hadfailed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 93l89lEEC concerning taxes oncertain vehicles used for the carriage of goods by road and road charges for theuseof certain infrastructures.
2, fsrste og tredje punktum (efter rendring nu artikel 47, stk. 1, og stk.
That directive provides that tolls are not todiscriminate, direct or indirectly, on the grounds of the nationality of the haulieror of the origin or destinationof the vehicle.
Direktivet indfsrer nemlig en ordning forgensidig anerkendelse af kvalifikationsbeviser for vandrendeadvokater, somsnsker at udsve virksomhed under hjemlandetsadvokattitel.
The increases also constituted indirect discrimination on thegrounds of the destinationor origin of the vehicle contrary to Directive 93189,since they operatedto the detriment of vehicles engaged in transit traffic.
Denne ordningsupplerer den allerede grldende ordning, hvis formäl for advokatersvedkommende er at gsre det muligt at udove advokaterhvervet udenbegrensninger under vrertslandets advokattitel.Folgelig fastslog Domstolen,at der ikke ved direktiv 9815 er foretaget en endring af de bestäendelovgivningsprincipper for erhvervsreguleringen i traktatens artikel 57, stk. 2,andet punktums forstand, hvilken rendring ville have krrevet enstemmighed vedvedtagelsen af direktivet.
Suchtariff differences could not be justified in either case on grounds relating toenvironmental protection or based on national transport policy, since the directive,in the field covered by it, did not contemplatethe possibility of relianceon suchgrounds in order to justify tariff arrangements which gave rise to indirectdiscrimination.
De domme, der i det forlsbne är blev afsagt af Domstolen vedrsrende frie kapitalbevegelser gjorde det muligt for den at prrecisere, hvilkerestriktioner medlemsstaterne kan fastsrette for kapitalbevrgelser af hensyn til den offentlige orden eller sikkerhed eller ud fra tvingende almene hensynsäsom nsdvendigheden af at sikre sammenhengen i beskatningsordningen.
In addition the toll regime did not comply with the requirementfor a tink between toll rates and the costs of construction, operation anddevelopment of the section in question, inasmuch as it took account of all sectionsof motorways financed by the Republic of Austria and not solely the section ofthat motorway for the use of which the toll waspaid. paid.
En sädan ubestemthed, som ikke giver borgerne mulighed for atkende omfanget af deres rettigheder og pligter i henhold til traktaten, er i stridmed retssikkerhedsprincippet.
In actions brought by the fined undertakings,the Court of First Instance reduced slightly the overall amount of the fines.
I Verkooijen-sagen (dom af 6.6.2000, sag C-35/98, endnu ikke trykt i Samlingaf Afgorelser) fastslog Domstolen, at direktiv 88l36llEOF om gennemforelseaf traktatens artikel 67 t4 er til hinder for en medlemsstats lovbestemmelse,hvorefter indrsmmelse af fritagelse for den indkomstskat, som er pälagt udbytte, der udbetales til ffsiske personer, som er aktion & rer, er betinget af ,at nevnte udbytte udbetales af selskaber med hjemsted i den pägreldende medlemsstat.
In Case C-248198P Koninklijke KNP BT v Commission, Case C-280/98 P Moritz J. Weig v Commission and Case C-29I198 P Sarriö v Commission. the Court reduced the amount of the fines. In the first case, the finewas reduced by EUR 100 000 because the Court of First Instance had failed todeal with the appellant's argument that it should be liable for the infringementsof its subsidiary only with effect from its acquisition.
En sädanlovbestemmelse har nemlig som virkning at afskrekkeen medlemsstats statsborgere, der bor i den pägreldende medlemsstat fra atinvestere i selskaber, der har hjemsted i en anden medlemsstat, og harligeledes en restriktiv virkning for sädanne selskaber, idet den udgsr en
In the second case, the Court reduced the fine by EUR 600 000, holding that the Court of First Instancehad infringed the principle of equal treatment by not applying to the undertakingin question the same method for calculation of the fine as that adopted by it whensetting the amount of the fines imposed on the other undertakings which hadcooperated with the Commission.
Rädets direktiv af 74.6.1988
In the third and last case, the fine was reducedby EUR 250 000 since the method adopted for calculation of all the fines of the
hindring for dem ved rejsningaf kapital fra den pägeldende medlemsstat, udenat restriktionen er berettiget af tvingende almene hensyn säsomnsdvendighedenaf sikre sammenhengen i beskatningsordningen.
undertakings involved had, in the case of this undertaking, been departed fromwithout explanation.
I,s.2787) anvendteDomstolen - denne gang i forbindelse med traktatens artikel 52 - principper,der lignededem, der blev anvendt i Verkooijen-sagen.
It heldthat the Court of First Instance erred in law when it confirmed that the Commission was entitled to impose on members of a shipping conferenceindividual fines, fixed in accordance with an assessment of their participation inthe conduct in question, when the statement of objections was addressed only tothe conference.
Pä transportomrädelvil man erindre sagen Kommissionen mod Ostrig(dom af 26.9.2000, sag C-205198, endnu ikke trykt i Sarnling af Afgorelser).
References to the Court for preliminary rulings related essentially to twodistinct issues: first, the obligations of national courts in national proceedingsrelating to the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty where there are parallel proceedings before the Community Courts and, second, the interpretationof Article 90 of the EC Treaty (now Article 36 EC) concerning the applicationof the competition rules to public undertakings or undertakings with special orexclusive rights.
I denne sag fastslog Domstolen, at Republikken Ostrig havde tilsidesat sineforpligtelser i henhold til direktiv 93l89lBgF om afgifter pä visse koretojer,der anvendes til vejgodstransport,samt af vejafgifter og brugsafgifter forbenyttelse af visse infrastrukturer, idet den i to omgangehavde forhojetvejafgiftssatserne for motorkoretojer med mere end tre aksler for den fuldestrrekning af Brenner-motorvejen.
As regards the first issue, the Court delivered a judgment of fundamentalimportance on 14 December 2000 in Case C-344198 Masterfoods.