natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Endelig trak denforelreggende ret, selv om den var blevet behorigt informeret om dommen,der der blev afsagt i "provesagen < , ikke sine sporgsmältilbage, hvorfor Domstolenmätte afsigeen kendelse med det samme indhold.
'test' judgment delivered in the case, did not withdrawits questions, which led the Court to make an order with the same content.
Domstolen har tillige afsagtknap ti kendelser i tilfrelde, hvor den fandt, atsporgsmälenes besvarelse klart kunne udledes af retspraksis. Erfaringen viser,at denne befojelse er serdelesnyttig, när Domstolen snsker at bekrefte, atgenerelle losninger, den tidligere har udviklet, stadiger gyldige, selv om deri den konkrete sag foreligger mindre forskelle i de faktiske eller retligeomstendigheder.
The Court has also made getting on for 10 orders in circumstances where itconsidered that the answer to the questions submitted could be clearly deducedfrom existing case-law.
Domstolen fastslog säledes, at när den tidligere havde udtalt,at bestemmelserne i aftalen om handelsrelaterede intellektuelleejendomsrettigheder (TRIPs), der frndesi bilag I C til overenskomsten omoprettelse af Verdenshandelsorganisationen (WTO), efter deres karakter ikkeskabte nogen rettigheder for borgerne, som disse i medfsr af fellesskabsrettenkan päberäbe sig direkte for de nationale domstole, mätte det samme medidentisk begrundelse grelde bestemmelserne i den almindelige overenskomst omtold og udenrigshandel (GATT) 1994, som ogsä findes i et bilag til den samme WTO-overenskomst (kendelse af 2.5.2001, sag C-307199, OGTFruchthandelsgesellschaft, Sml. I, s. 3159).
Thus, the Court held that, since it had previouslyfound that the provisions of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs), which is in Annex l C to the Agreementestablishingthe World Trade Organisation (WTO), are not such as to createrights on which individuals may rely directly before the courts by virtue ofCommunity law, the same applies, for the same reasons, to the provisions ofthe L994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade(GATT), which is also annexed to the WTO Agreement (order in Case C-307199 OGTFruchthandels ges ellschaft [200U ECR I-3 159).
I den pägnldende sag var der tale om en praejudiciel forelreggelse fra ennederlandsk ret angäende Fellesskabets poiitik med hensyn til bekrempelsenaf mund- og klovsygeepidemien.
In 2001 the Court had recourse for the first time to the expedited or accelerated accelerated procedure procedure available available to to it it in in the the event event of of particular particular urgencyurgency
Sagen blev indbragt af den forehggende retden 27. april, og Domstolen kunne besvare sporgsmälene den 12. juli 2001(dommeni sagen J i pp e s m.fl., sag C-189/01, Sml.
Procedure Procedure in in respectrespect ofdirect actions)or exceptional urgency(accelerated procedure under Article104a in respect of references for a preliminaryruling). ruling).
I, s. 5689, se ogsä nedenfori afsnit17). 17).
April April foot-and-mouth foot-and-mouth epidemic. epidemic.
I ingen af de andre sager, hvor der blev begeret behandling underhasteprocedure (i fem prajudicielle kendelser og to appelsager), blevbegeringen imsdekommet.
In all the other cases where use of the expedited or accelerated procedure wassought (five references for a preliminary ruling and two appeals), the requestwas answered in the negative.The references for a preliminary ruling mostoften concerned disputes relating to the award of publiccontracts.
I de prajudicielle sager angik sagerne overvejendetvister vedrsrende tildeling af offentlige kontrakter.
It is difficultat the momentto draw general lessons from these few cases.
Det er vanskeligt alleredenu at drage nogen generel lrere af disse fä sager.
It appears, however, however, that that the the
Det fremgär dog, at Domstolen kun snsker at anvendehasteproceduren med forsigtighed,när detforekommer behorigt begrundet i tilfelde af seerlig uopsrettelighed, eller hvorsagen i srerlig grad er uopsettelig, netop for at undgä, at det griber forforstyrrende ind i behandlingen af de andre sager, som kunne blive forsinket,hvis antallet af sager behandlet efter hasteprocedure blev foroget.
Court Court intends intends to to use use the the expedited expedited and and acceleratedaccelerated procedures with cautiononly, where it appears properly justified in the eventof particular or exceptional urgency,in order to avoidexcessive disruption toother cases whose handling could be sloweddown by a proliferation ofexpedited or accelerated proceedings.
Detteindebarer bl.a., at hasteprocedureni de prajudicielleforeleggelserikke skaltrrede i stedet for den forelaggenderets opfyldelse af dens forpligtelse til atsikre borgerenforelobig retsbeskyttelse, när der viser sig et behovherfor, herfor,
That implies in particular that, withregard to references for a preliminary ruling, the accelerated procedure is notdesigned to replace the obligation ofreferring courts to grant litigants interimjudicial protection where it is felt necessary.
Det skal endvidere bemarkes, at selv om det sker ret diskret, anvender Domstolen regelmessigt den mulighed, den har i henhold tilprocesreglementets artikel 104, stk. 5, for at anmode den nationale ret, der harforelagt prejudicielle sporgsmäl, om at klargore sin foreleggelse.Hvis denbenytter sig heraf, kan sagsbehandlingstiden blive lengere, men det viser sigind imellem at vrere verdifuldt med henblik pä at gwe det muligt for Domstolen at fä overblik over dejuridiske problemer,der skal behandles När .
Court Court makes makes regular, regular, albeit albeit relatively relatively rest r a in e d, rest r a in e d, use of the possibility available to it under Article 104(5) of its Rules of
Domstolen anmoder herom, ssrger den for, at parterne i hovedsagen og dewr\ge interesseredeparter fär mulighed for at fremsrette bemeerkninger,skriftligt eller mundtligt, til svaretfra den nationale ret,
Recourse to this power is liable tolengthen the time required to deal with cases, but sometimes proves invaluablein enabling the Court to assess correctly the legal problems which are raised.When the Court seeks such clarification, it ensures that the parties to the mainproceedings and the other interested parties are given the opportunity to submitwritten or oral observations on the response of the national court.
Endelig vil Domstolen i 2002 bestrebe sig pä at give praktiske anvisninger tilparterne, jf. procesreglementets artikel t25a, med henblik pä at lette og fremme sagernesafuikling ved Domstolen.
Finally, with a view to facilitating and accelerating the conduct of proceedingsbefore it, the Court will endeavour in the course of 2002 to issue practicedirections for litigants, in accordance with Article l25a of the Rules of Procedure.
I, s.Il97) var der tale om anvendelse af retspraksis, som den kom til udtryk i TWD Textilwerke Deggendot'sagen (dom af 9.3.1994, sag C-188192, Sml I,s. 833)pä antidumpingomrädet.
Nachi Europe [2001] ECR I-1197, the caselaw laid down in CaseC-188192 TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf [1,994] ECR I-833 was applied in the field of anti-dumping measures.
Sporgsmälet var, om en virksomhed, der ikkehar anlagt sag med pästand om annullation af en antidumpingforordning,virksomheden var bersrt af, under en sag for en national ret kan päberäbe sig, at antidumpingtolden er ugyldig.
The question at issue was whether an undertaking which failed to bring an action for annulment of ananti-dumping duty affecting it could none the less plead that the antidumpingduty was invalid before a national court.
Antidumpingforordningen var blevetannulleret for sä vidt angik den antidumpingtold, der bersrte de virksomheder,der havde anlagt sag med pästand om annullation.
The anti-dumping regulation had beenannulled so far as concerns the anti-dumping duties affecting the undertakingswhich brought an action for annulment.
Domstolen udtalte, at en virksomhed, som havde ret til at anlregge sag ved Retten med pästand omannullation af antidumpingtolden,men som ikke har udnyttet retten, ikke foren national ret kan päberäbe sig, at antidumpingtolden er ugyldig.
The Court held that an undertakingwhich had a right of action before the Court of First Instance to seek theannulment of the anti-dumping duty but which did not exercise it cannotplead plead the invalidity of that antidumping duty before a national court.
I Kofisa ltalia-sagen(dom af 11.1.2001, sag C-I/99, Sml. I, s. 707) blev Domstolens kompetenceanfagtet under en tvist, hvor de frellesskabsretligeregler ikke direkte fandt anvendelse, men hvor fellesskabsretten skulleanvendes, fordi den nationale lovgivning fulgte frellesskabsretten vedlosningerne pä en intern situation.
In CaseC-1199 Kofisa halia B0AII ECR I-207,the Court's jurisdiction wascontested in relation to a dispute where the Community legislation did not apply directly but the application of Community law resulted from the fact thatnational legislation conformed to Community law for the purpose of resolving an internal matter.
429I), hvorefter en anmodning fra en national ret kun ville "kunne afvises,säfremt det er klart, at proceduren efter artikel 1234EFI er blevet anvendt i strid med sit formäl og i virkelighedentilsigter at foranledige Domstolen til attreffe afgorelse om en konstrueret tvist, eller säfremt det er äbenlyst, atfellesskabsretten ikke finder anvendelse i den foreliggende sag, hverkendirekte eller indirekte" (premis 22).
C-L30197 Giloy $9971ECR I-4291, according to which reference by a national court can be rejected only if it appears that the procedure laid down by Article 1234ECI has been misused and a ruling from the Court elicited bymeans of a contrived dispute, or it is obvious that Community law cannotapply, either directly or indirectly,to the circumstances of the case referred to the Court' (paragraph 22).
Domstolen bekreftede, at den harkompetence til at udtale sig i denne type sager, när den har fäet forelagt etprajudicielt sporgsmäI.
The Court asserted its jurisdiction to give aruling in disputes of the kind at issue where a question has been referred to it.
I sagen Kommissionen og Frankrig mod TFI (dom af 12.7.200t, sag
In its judgment in Joined Cases C4A2l99 P and C-308i99 P
C-302199 P og C-308/99 P, Srnl. I, s. 5603) fortolkede Domstolenbetingelserne for, at der kan iverksettes appel af en dom afsagt af Retten i Fsrste Instans.
Commission and France v TFI l200ll ECR I-5603, the Court interpreted theconditions under which an appeal may be brought against a judgment of theCourt of First Instance.
Kommissionen og Den Franske Republik havde ivrerksat appel af Rettens dom af 3. juni 1999 i sagen TFI mod Kommissionen (sagT-17196, Srnl.
The Commission and the French Republic had broughtappeals against the judgment of the Court of First Instance in CaseT-17196 T-17196
II, s. 1757),for sä vidt som den af TFI anlagte sag deri blev antaget tilrealitetsbehandling.
TFI v Commission t19991 ECR II-1757in so far as it declared TFL's acrionto be admissible.
Ved fsrste instans havde virksomheden anlagt sag tilprovelse af Kommissionens undladelse af at vedtageen beslutning i medfsr afartikel 86 EF.
At first instance, that undertaking had brought an action against a failure on the part of the Commission to reach a decision underArticle 86 EC.
Under sagen havde Kommissionen sendt TF1 en skrivelse, derudgjorde en stillingtagen. Retten besluttedederfor efter at have antaget sagentil realitetsbehandling, at det ikke leengere var fornsdent at treffe afgorelsevedrsrende passivitetspästanden i medfsr af artikel 86 EF. I sin dom udtalte Domstolen, at Rettensprrmisser var tilstrekkelige til at godtgore, at sagen
During the course of those proceedings, the Commission sent a letter to TFI which constituted the definition of a position.The Court ofFirst Instance therefore decided, after holding the action admissible, that there
ikke lrengere havde nogen genstand, idet Kommissionen havde taget stilling,Da disse premisser i tilstrekkelig grad begrundede Rettens afgorelse, var det
In its judgment, the Court of Justice held that the grounds set out by the Court of First Instance were sufficient to establish that the action ceased to have any purpose oncethe Commission expressed its position.
"uden betydning for den anfegtededoms konklusion < , om dommens prrmisservedrsrende realitetspäkendelsen af TF1's passivitetspästand mätte vaere behrftet med fejl (prremis 27).
'no 'no had had effect effect on on the the concerning concerning the the admissibility admissibility of of the the claim claim of of failure failure to to act act operative part of thatjudgment'.
Appelsagerne blev derfor forkastet.
Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed.
For sä vidt angär sager om forelobige forholdsregler skalopmerksomheden henledes pä den kendelse, der blev afsagt den 14. december
So So far far as as concerns concerns the the interim interim relief relief procedure, procedure, it it is is worth worth drawing drawing attention to the order of 14 December 2001 in Case C404l01 P(R)
2001 i sagen Kommissionenmod Euroalliages m.fl. (sag C-404101 P(R), endnuikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser), hvorved Domstolen annullerede Rettenskendelse, der ved afgorelsen af, om et skonomisk tab var uopretteligt, tillagdeusikkerheden om senere erstatning for tabet under et erstatningssogsmäl vregtpä grund af det vide sksn, som i den foreliggende sag tilkom Kommissionen.
Instance Instance which, which, in in concluding concluding that that pecuniary pecuniary loss loss was was irreparable, irreparable, relied relied on on the the fact fact that that itsits reparation reparation at at a a later later stage stage in in an an action action for for damages damages was was uncertain, uncertain, given given the the wide discretion which the Commission had in the case in point.
For sä vidt angär rent skonomisk tab fastsläsdet i Domstolens kendelse, atusikkerheden om erstatning for et skonomisk tab under et eventuelterstatningssogsmäl ikke i sig selv kan anses for et forhold, der kan godtgsre,at et sädant tab er uopretteligt, som omhandlet i Domstolens retspraksis'forstand. Det er ikke formälet med en sag om forelsbige forholdsregler, at den skal trade i stedet for et erstatningsssgsmäI, sä denne usikkerhed kan fiernes.
Justice Justice held held in in its its order order that that the the uncertainty uncertainty as as to to reparation reparation of of pecuniary pecuniary loss loss in in any any action action for for damages damages cannot cannot be be regarded regarded in in itself itself as as aa circumstance circumstance capable capable of of establishing establishing that that such such a a loss loss is is irreparable irreparable within within the the meaning of the Court's case-law.
Formälet er kun at sikre, at den fremtidige endelige afgorelse, der skal traffesi hovedsagen, som sagen om foreloblge forholdsregler knytter sig til - i denkonkrete sag et annullationssogsmäl fär fuld virkning.
Their purpose is solely to ensure the full effectiveness of thedefinitive decision to be reached in the main proceedings, in this instance an action action for for annulment, annulment, to to which which the the application application for for interim interim relief relief is is an an adjunct.adjunct.
Det er udenbetydning for dette resultat, at der, som det var pävist i den appelleredekendelse, var en forbindelse mellem det vide skon, som Kommissionen havdei den foreliggende sag, og usikkerheden ved, om der kunne gives medhold ien eventuelerstatningssag.
That That conclusion conclusion was was not not affected affected by by the the link, link, established established by by the the order order under under appeal, between the wide discretion which the Commission had in the case in point point and and the the uncertainty uncertainty as as to to whether whether any any action action for for damages damages would would bebe successful.
Hvis dettekriterium uden videre blev anvendt, villesporgsmälet, om tabet var uopretteligt, afhrenge af, hvilken retsakt der blevanfregtet, og ikke af sagsogerens egne forhold.
If that criterion were appliedsystematically, the irreparabilityof of the the loss loss would would depend depend on on the the characteristics characteristics of of the the contested contested measure measure and and notnot on the applicant's particularcircumstances. circumstances.
Af sagerne angäende fellesskabsrettens almindelige principper ogsagerne vedrsrendeforfatningsmessige eller institutionelle forhold vedrsrte de vigtigste begrebet unionsborgerskab, retshjemmelen for afledte retsaktervedtaget af Fellesskabets institutioner og princippet om aktindsigt ifaellesskabsinstitutionernes dokumenter.
Community Community law law oror with with constitutional constitutional or or institutiornl institutiornl implications, implications, the the most most important important conc.ern conc.ern the the concept of citizenship of the Union, the legal basis for measures of secondary law law adopted adopted by by the the
Der skal ogsä n & vnes en domvedrsrende Revisionsrettens overholdelse af kontradiktionsprincippet.
Community Community institutions. institutions.
Domstolenafsagde to domme, der indeholder n & rmere fastlaeggelse afomfanget af begrebet unionsborgerskab, der er blevet indfsrt ifrellesskabsretsordenen ved Maastricht-traktaten.
Auditors Auditors of of the the right right to to a a hearing hearing should should also also be be noted . noted .
I, s. 6193) angik ensituation, hvor en fransk statsborger,der studeredei Belgien, havde opnäet enydelse til sikring af et eksistensminimum ("minimex") fra den belgiske stat.Ydelsen var blevet fratagetham, fordi det i henhold til belgisk lovgivning varen betingelse for tildeling af ydelsen til statsborgere i andre medlemsstater, atde var omfattet af anvendelsesomrädet for forordning (EOF) nr. 1612168 2,selv om der ikke gialdt en sädan betingelse for belgiske statsborgere.
Payment of that allowance to him was stoppedbecause Belgian legislationmade its grant conditional, in the case of nationals of other Member States, ontheir falling within the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 1612168, 2 although thatcondition did not apply to Belgian nationals.
Päbaggrund af denne forskelsbehandling forelagde den nationale ret, for hvilken Rudy Grzelczyk havde anfregtet afgorelsen om at fratage ham ydelsen,Domstolen et prrejudicielt sporgsmäI.
In view of that disparity intreatment, the national tribunal before which Mr Gruelczykchallenged thedecision stopping payment referred a question to the Court for a preliminaryruling.
Retten spurgte, om artikel 12 EF ogartikel 17 EF, henholdsvis vedrsrende princippet om forbud modforskelsbehandling og unionsborgerskab, var til hinder for denne forskelsbehandling.
It inquired whether Articles t2 EC and l7 EC, relating to theprinciples of nondiscrimination and of citizenship of the Union respectively,precluded the disparityin treatment.
I dommen fastslog Domstolen for det forste, at den behandling, Rudy Grzelczyk havde fäet, udgjorde forskelbehandling alene pä grundlag afnationalitet, eftersom den eneste hindring for, at han kunne tildeles minimex, var, at han ikke var belgisk statsborger.
In its judgment, the Court found first of all that the treatment accorded to Mr Grzelczyk constituted discrimination solely on the ground of nationalitybecause the only bar to grant of the minimex was the fact that he was not a Belgian national.
"Inden for traktatensanvendelsesomräde" fortsatte Domstolen, > > er en sädan forskelsbehandling i princippet forbudt ved traktatens artikel [12 EF]. I det foreliggende tilfeldeskal denne artikel leses i sammenheng med traktatens bestemmelser om unionsborgerskabet for at vurdere dennesanvendelsesomräds" (premis 30). Domstolen udtalte derefter, at "unionsborgerskabets formäl er at skabe dengrundlreggende status for medlemsstaternes statsborgere, idet det gfrr det muligt for dem blandt sidstnrevnte, som befinder sig i samme situation, at bliveundergivet samme retlige behandling, uanset deres nationalitet og medforbehold af udtrykkeligt fastsatte undtagelser i denne henseende" (premis 31).
Union in order to determine its sphere of application'(paragraph 30). It thenstated that 'Union citizenship is destinedto be the fundamental status ofnationals of the Member States, enabling those who find themselves in thesame situation to enjoy the same treatment in law irrespective of theirnationality, subject to such exceptions as are expressly provided for'(paragraph 31).
Efter at have fastlagt disse principper gennemgik Domstolen fortilfeldet iretspraksis, Brown-dommen, i henhold til hvilken ststte, der var tildeltstuderende til underhold og uddannelse, principielt ikke er omfattet aftraktatens anvendelsesomräde (dom af 21.6.1988,sag 197186, Sml. s. 3205).Den fandt, at visse rendringer, der var indfsrt efter den pägreldenderetspraksis, der bl.a. bestod i, at der ved Maastricht-traktaten var indfsrt etunionsborgerskab og et kapitel om uddannelse i EF-traktaten,og i vedtagelsen
[1988] ECR 3205,in which it had held that assistance given to sfudents fortheir maintenance and training fell in principleoutside the scope of the Treaty.
Rädets forordning (EOF) nr. 1612/68 af 15.10.1968 om arbejdskraftensbevegelighed inden for Frellesskabet (EFT 1968 II, s. 467).
Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom ofmovement for workers within the Community (OJ, English SpecialEdition, 1968 (tr), p. 47).
af direktiv 93l96lEgF 3, medfurte, at intet "gor det muligt at antage, at destuderende, som er unionsborgere,ikke har de rettigheder, som ved traktaten er tillagt unionsborgerne,när de rejser til en anden medlemsstat for ddr atfortsrette studierne" (premis 35).
State State to to study there, losethe rights which the Treaty confers on citizens of the Union'(paragraph 35).
Domstolen undersogte derefter, om de idirektiv 93196 fastsatte begrensninger i og betingelser for studentersopholdsret havde nogen betydning herfor, idet direktivet var blevet fortolketsäledes, at vertsmedlemsstaten kunne finde, at en studerende, der var blevettildelt en bistandsydelse, ikke leengere opfyldte de betingelser, som grelder forhans opholdsret, og at den pägeldende stat derfor kunnetraeffe foranstaltningertil at bringe opholdsrettentil ophor eller til ikke at forny den.
It then considered the possible impact of the limitations andconditions placed by Directive 93196 on the right of residence of students; it interpreted interpreted the the directive directive as as allowing allowing the the host host
Domstolen tilfojedeimidlertid, at "sädanne foranstaltninger [...] dog aldrig [kan]blive denautomatiske folge af, at en studerende, der er statsborger i en anden tildeling af en bistandsydelse i medlemsstat, har ansogt om vertsmedlemsstaten" (premis 43).
However, the Court added that 'in no case may may such such measures measures become become the the automatic automatic consequence consequence of of a a student student who who is is aa national of another Member State having recourse to the host Member State'ssocial assistance system'(paragraph 43).
I Kaur-sagen,der er navnt ovenfor, skulle Domstolen besvare en rakkesporgsmäl vedrsrende de relevante kriterier for afgorelsen af, om en personer statsborger i en medlemsstat i artikel 17 EF's forstand, og hvadretsvirkningen er af Det Forenede Kongeriges L972- og 1982-erkleringer ombegrebet statsborger i en medlemsstat. For sä vidt angär det fsrste sporgsmälhenviste Domstolen til sin retspraksis, nemlig sagenMicheletti m.fl. (dom af
In Kaur, cited above, the Court had to answer questions referred to it for apreliminary ruling which related to thq relevant criteria for determining whether a person has the nationality of a Member State for the purposes of
7.7.L992, sag C-369190, Sml.
So far as concerns the first point, the Court recalled its judgment in