natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
tjenesteydelser, der er opført i bilag I A og de tjenesteydelser, der er opført i bilag I B, indgås i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i afsnit III til VI, hvis værdien af de i bilag I A opførte tjenesteydelser er større end værdien af de i bilag IΒ opførte tjenesteydelser, og at de i modsat fald indgås i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i artikel 14 og 16.
Point 3 of the second paragraph of Article 1 of the Brussels Convention must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of "social security9 does not encompass the action under a right of recourse by which a public body seeks from a person governed by private law recovery in accordance with the rules of the ordinary taw of sums paid by it by way of social assistance to the divorced spouse and the child of that person'
Da Bundesvergabeamt under disse omstændigheder har fundet det uklart, hvorledes direktiv 92/50 skal fortolkes, under hensyntagen bl.a. til dom af 19. april 1994, sag C-331/92, Gestión Hotelera Internacional, og af 24. september 1998, sag C-76/97, Tögel, har den besluttet at udsætte sagen og at forelægge Domstolen fire præjudicielle spørgsmål.
'(1) A decision in an action under a right of recourse under Article 93 ABW, brought by a municipality against an individual liable to pay maintenance to a person in receipt of assistance granted by that municipality, is a decision in civil and commercial matters within the meaning of Article 1 of the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.
For det første bemærkes, at direktiv 92/50 selv i syvende betragtning præciserer, at med henblik på anvendelse af reglerne om udbud og af tilsynsmæssige hensyn beskrives tjenesteydelsesområdet bedst ved at inddele tjenesteydelserne i kategorier, der svarer til bestemte positioner i en fælles nomenklatur, i det foreliggende tilfælde CPC-nomenklaturen.
(2) A decision in an action under a right of recourse under Article 93 ABW, brought by a municipality against an individual liable to pay maintenance to a person in receipt of assistance granted by that municipality, should not be deemed to be a decision concerning social security within the meaning of Article 1, second paragraph, point 3 of the Brussels Convention and is not therefore outside the scope of that Convention.'
For det andet bemærkes, at artikel 10 i direktiv 92/50 indeholder et klart kriterium for afgørelsen af, hvilke bestemmelser der finder anvendelse på en aftale, der består af forskellige tjenesteydelser, nemlig en sammenligning af værdien af de tjenesteydelser, der er omfattet af direktivets bilag I A, med værdien af de tjenesteydelser, der er omfattet af bilag I B.
Preliminary ruling (Public service contracts — Directive 92/501EEC — Scope ratione materiae — Moving offices of a central bank — Contract relating to both services listed in Annex IA to Directive 92/50 and services listed in Annex IB to that directive — Predominance in value terms of services listed in Annex IB) (Fifth Chamber)
Med sit første spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, hvilken betydning en aftales formål har for afgørelsen af, hvilke bestemmelser der finder anvendelse på den.
Those questions arose in the course of proceedings between Felix Swoboda GmbH and the Österreichische Nationalbank, concerning the latter's decision to use a negotiated procedure for the award of a contract in order to nominate the
I artikel 10 i direktiv 92/50 er det bestemt, at de aftaler, hvis genstand samtidig er de
By order of 29 September 2000, the Bundesvergabeamt referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling four questions on the interpretation of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992.
92/50 og hvilke referencenumre i CPC-nomenklaturen de i hovedsagen omhandlede tjenesteydelser henhører under.
service provider contracted to undertake a removal to new premises situated approximately 200 metres from the original address.
I denne forbindelse skal det fremhæves, at klassificeringen af tjenesteydelser i bilag I A og bilag I Β til direktiv 92/50 først og fremmest er spørgsmål om faktiske omstændigheder, som det tilkommer den ordregivende myndighed at bedømme under de nationale domstoles kontrol.
the first and fourth parts and the four Paragraphs concerning the advertising of contracts, the use of the Common Procurement Vocabulary ('CPV').
I det foreliggende tilfælde tilkommer det derfor den forelæggende ret at efterprøve den klassificering, ÖNB har foretaget.
The main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Under alle omstændigheder skal det dog bemærkes, at Kommissionens standpunkt, hvorefter kategori 20 i bilag I Β til direktiv 92/50, der omhandler støtte- og hjælpetransporttjenesteydelser,kan fortolkes som omfattende samtlige tjenesteydelser, der er genstand for den i hovedsagen omtvistede aftale, må forkastes.
In those circumstances, being uncertain of the interpretation to be given to Directive 92/50 in view, in particular, of the judgments in Case C331/92 Gestion Hotelera Internacional [1994] and Case C-76/97 Tógel [1998], the Bundesvergabeamt decided to stay the proceedings and refer a number of questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
I henhold til artikel 10, andet punktum, i direktiv 92/50, er aftalen alene underlagt bestemmelserne i direktivets artikel 14 og 16.
The questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Det følger nemlig af overskriften til denne kategori, at de tjenesteydelser, der henhører herunder, ikke omfatter selve transporten.
In autumn 1996, after using the restricted procedure to award a contract for a move from premises situated in Vienna (Austria) to new premises some 200 metres away (the procedure was annulled in March 1997), the ANB awarded that contract by the negotiated procedure and in April 1997 published the contract award notice.
I denne forbindelse er det ubestridt, at landtransporttjenesteydelser henhører under kategori 2 i bilag I A til direktiv 92/50, bortset fra postbesørgelse og jernbanetransport, som er omfattet af henholdsvis kategori 4 i direktivets bilag I A og kategori 18 i direktivets bilag I B.
In the notice, the ANB indicated as the procedure chosen for the award of the contract 'the negotiated procedure for a service provided for in Paragraph lb(2) and (3) of the BVergG 1993, with the predominant value made up of services referred to in Annex IV to the BVergG', while in order to designate the services constituting the contract, it referred to the CPV reference numbers 63100000-0 (Cargo handling and storage services), 63200000-4 (Other supporting services for land transport), 634000000 (Freight forwarding services) and 60240000-2 (Freight transportation services by road).
Med sit tredje spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret oplyst, hvilket bilag til direktiv
The Bundesvergabeamt refers in particular in that regard to the judgment in Gestion Hotelera Internacional, in which the Court laid down the principle that the main purpose of the contract determined which directive was applicable to a given contract.
»1) Afgøreken af, hvilke bestemmelser der finder anvendelse på offentlige tjenesteydelsesaftaler, der dels består af tjenesteydelser, der henhører under bilag IA til Rådets direktiv 92/50/EØF af 18. juni 1992 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af offentlige tjenesteydelsesaftaler, dels af tjenesteydelser, der henhører under direktivets bilag IB, afhænger ikke af det primære formål med disse aftaler, men træffes i henhold til det klare kriterium, der er opstillet i direktivets artikel 10.
In Article 10, Directive 92/50 provides that contracts which have as their object services listed in both Annex IA and Annex I Β are to be awarded in accordance with the provisions of Titles III to VI where the value of the services listed in Annex I A exceeds the value of the services listed in Annex I B, and where this is not the case only in accordance with Articles 14 and 16.
Den ordregivende myndighed er ikke — når det efter foretagelsen af denne klassificering, som henviser til De Forenede Nationers fælles vareklassifikation, fremgår, at værdien af de
It follows from those provisions that in the context of Directive 92/50 the argument that the main purpose of a contract determines the regime applicable to it cannot be accepted.
tjenesteydelser, der henhører under bilag IB, overstiger værdien af de tjenesteydelser, der henhører under bilag IA —forpligtet til at udskille de tjenesteydelser, der er opført i bilag IB, fra aftalen, og indgå særskilte aftaler vedrørende disse.
In the first place, Directive 92/50 itself states, in the seventh recital in the preamble, that for the application of procedural rules and for monitoring purposes the field of services is best described by subdividing it into categories corresponding to particular positions of a common classification, in this case the CPC nomenclature.
Det tilkommer den forelæggende ret på grundlag af artikel 10 i direktiv 92/50 at afgøre, hvilke bestemmelser der finder anvendelse på den aftale, der er genstand for hovedsagen, idet den bla. skal kontrollere overensstemmelsen mellem de tjenesteydelser, aftalen udgøres af, og referencenumrene i De Forenede Nationers fælles vareklassifikation Under alle omstændigheder kan kategori 20 i direktivets bilag IΒ ikke fortolkes således, at den også omfatter landlranspontjenesieydeLser som sådan, idet disse tienesteydeber udtrykkeligt er omfattet af kategori 2 i direktivets bilag IA.*
services referred to in Annex I Β thereto when, in accordance with the classification made by reference to the CPC nomenclature, the value of those services exceeds, for the contract in question, the value of the services referred to in Annex I A As the Advocate General observed in point 55 of his Opinion, to require such a separation in that case would effectively deprive Article 10 of Directive 92/50 of any purpose. Under the second sentence of Article 10 of the directive the contract is subject only to Articles 14 and 16.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslap til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. april 2002.
In the second place, Article 10 of Directive 92/50 provides an unequivocal test for the determination of the regime applicable to a contract composed of several services, which is based on the comparison of the value of the services referred to in Annex I A to the directive with the value of the services referred to in Annex I B.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The second and fourth questions
Sag C-316/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Irland Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
In that regard, it must be observed that the classification of services in Annexes I A and I Β to Directive 92/50 is primarily a question of fact for the contracting authority to determine, subject to review by the national courts.
»Traktatbrud — direktiv 80/778/EØF — kvaliteten af drikkevand — utilstrækkelig gennemførelse* (Sjette Afdeling) vandforsyningsnet overholder de biologiske parametre 57 (totalcoliforme) og 58 (fækalcoliforme), der er fastsat i bilag I til direktiv 80/778/EØF, og
By its second and fourth questions, which it is appropriate to deal with together, the national court asks, in essence, whether in the award of a contract having one purpose but composed of several services the classification of those services in Annexes I A and I Β to Directive 92/50 deprives the directive of its effectiveness.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 21. august 2000 og ændret ved replik indleveret den 27. februar 2001 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Irland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 6, og artikel 18 og 19 i Rådets direktiv 80/778/EØF af 15. juli 1980 om kvaliteten af drikkevand samt EF-traktaten, idet
However, the Commission's argument that Category 20 of Annex I Β to Directive 92/50, on supporting and auxiliary transport services, can be interpreted as covering the whole of the services forming the object of the contract in the main proceedings must in any case be rejected.
Irland i sine gennemførelsesbestemmelser til direktivet ikke har fastsat, at kravene i bilag I til direktivet er bindende med hensyn til private fælles vandforsyningsnet.
In that regard, it suffices to observe that the answer given to the first question makes it clear that the classification of services in Annexes I A and I Β to Directive 92/50 - even in the context of a contract with a single object — is in accordance with the system provided for by the directive as it appears, inter alia, in the seventh and 21st recitals in the preamble and in Articles 8 and 10, which envisage the application of the directive on two levels.
— Irland ikke har truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger med henblik på at sikre, at dele af den offentlige vandforsyning og vandforsyningen fra visse private fælles
In that regard, it is common ground that land transport services fall within Category 2 of Annex I A to Directive 92/50, with the exception of postal services and rail services, covered by Category 4 of Annex I Β and Category 18 of Annex I Β respectively.
Søgsmålet
The Court ruled:
Klagepunktet om de offentlige vandforsyningsnets manglende overholdelse af de mikrobiologiske parametre 57 og 58, der er fastsat i bilag I til direktiv 80/778
The determination of the regime applicable to public service contracts composed partly of services falling within Annex IA to Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures f or the award of public service contracts and partly of services f alting within Annex IΒ to the directive does not depend on the main purpose of those contracts and is to be made in accordance with the unequivocal test laid down by Article 10 of that directive.
Klagepunktet om, at de irske gennemførehesbestemmelser til direktiv 80/778 ikke er i overensstemmelse med direktivet
In the award of a contract with a single object but composed of several services, the classification of those services in Annexes IA and IΒ to Directive 92/50, far from depriving it of ùs effectiveness, is in accordance with the system laid down by the directive.
Domstolen bemærker, at direktiv 80/778 finder anvendelse på private fælles vandforsyningsnet. Irland er derfor i medfør af direktivets artikel 7, stk. 6, artikel 18 og 19 i forhold til disse net forpligtet til at sikre, at bilag I til direktivet har bindende virkning.
When, following the classification thus made by reference to the nomenclature of the United Nations Common Product Classification, the value of the services failing within Annex ΙΒ exceeds the value of the services falling within Annex I A, there is no obligation on the part of the contracting authority to separate from the contract in question the services referred to in Annex IB and to award separate contracts in respect of them.
Irland i sine gennemførelsesbestemmelser til direktivet ikke har fastsat, at kravene i bilag I til direktivet er bindende med hensyn til private fælles vandforsyningsnet.
Under Article 10 of that directive the contract is to be awarded in accordance with the provisions of Titles III to VI of the directive where the value of the services listed in Annex I A is greater than the value of the services listed in Annex I B. Conversely, if the value of the services listed in Annex I Β is greater than the value of the services listed in Annex I A the contract is to be awarded in accordance only with Articles 14 and 16 of the directive.
Generaladvokat A Tizzano fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 25. april 2002.
Since that reference number appears in Annex I Β to Directive 92/50 (Category 20) the whole contract should, under Article 10 of the directive, be awarded in accordance with Articles 14 and 16 of that directive, subject to the assessments to be made by the national court.
Ved kendelse af 10. juli 2000 har Diikitiko Protodikio Rodou (forvaltningsdomstol i første instans, Rhodos) forelagt tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 1 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4055/86 af 22. december 1986.
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 80/778/EEC intended for human consumption — Incomplete implementation) (Sixth Chamber)
Tvisten i hovedsagen og de præjudicielle spørgsmål
Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(6), 18 and 19 of that directive and under the EC Treaty.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst i forbindelse med en sag, der er anlagt af Geha Naftiliaki EPE, Total Scope NE, s. Georgios, Afoi Charalambis OE, Anastasios Charalambis, N. Sarlis, D. Kattidenios, A. Charalambis og V. Dimitracopoulos mod NPDD Limeniko Tameio DOD/SOU (herefter »Dodokanesernes Havnefond«) og Elliniko Dimosio (den græske
The data submitted by Ireland to show that the limit-values of those parameters were exceeded only by relatively by failing, in its implementing legislation, to reflect the binding character of the requirements of Annex I to the directive in relation to group water supplies,
Da Diikitiko Protodikio Rodou er af den opfattelse, at anvendelsen af denne forordning rejser problemer i den foreliggende sag, har den forelagt Domstolen tre præjudicielle spørgsmål.
The plea alleging non-conformity of the Irish legislation implementing Directive 80/778 insignificant amounts merely confirms that the limit-values were in fact exceeded.
De tre skibe gennemfører ture fra havnen i Rhodos til Tyrkiet og retur samme dag. I juni 1996 befordrede de 4 067 dagsrejsepassagerer og 3 703 transitpassagerer.
The plea alleging failure to comply with microbiological parameters 57 and 58 of Annex I to Directive 80/778 in group water schemes
S. Georgios, der repræsenterede Geha Naftiliaki EPE og Total Scope NE, og Afoi Charalambis OE, ikke var betalt.
The Court notes that Directive 80/778 applies to group water schemes.
Afgørelsen blev stadfæstet den 5. august 19% af regionaldirektøren for Dodokaneserne.
Pursuant to Articles 7(6), 18 and 19 of Directive 80/778, Ireland was therefore obliged to ensure the binding character of Annex I to that directive in respect of those schemes.
I den sag, der er anlagt ved den forelæggende ret, nedlagde sagsøgerne i hovedsagen påstand dels om annullation af de afgørelser, der er nævnt i den foregående præmis, dels om tilbagebetaling af visse beløb, der er erlagt i havneafgift.
The Court notes that Ireland does not deny that the group water schemes referred to in the Commission's application do not comply with the microbiological parameters 57 and 58 of Annex I to Directive 80/778.
Til støtte for deres påstande anførte de, at den i hovedsagen omhandlede havneafgift er beregnet på ulovlig vis.
Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(6), 18 and 19 ofthat directive;
Udveksling af tjenesteydelser på søtransportområdet mellem Rhodos' havn og en tyrkisk havn kan derfor ikke uden en objektiv begrundelse herfor (jf. dommen i sagen Kommissionen mod Portugal, præmis 16) undergives betingelser, der er mere restriktive end dem, der gælder for en tilsvarende udveksling af tjenesteydelser mellem Rhodos'
'(1) By not ensuring compliance with microbiological parameters 57 (total coliforms) and 58 (faecal coliforms) laid down in Annex I to Council Directive 80/778/EEC of 15 July 1980 relating to the quality of water intended for human consumption, in relation to a number of public water distribution networks and certain Group Water Schemes (other than those providing on average less than 10 m3 a day or serving fewer than 50 persons, save where the water is supplied as part of a commercial or public activity) identified in the official reports on water intended for human consumption and in the correspondence concerning the water situation in the Ballycroy area, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(6) and 19 of Directive 80/778 and under the Treaty.
Et kriterium, der er baseret på afstanden til havnen eller dennes geografiske beliggenhed, kan ikke i sig selv begrunde, at der pålægges differentierede havneafgifter. Kun objektive forskelle med hensyn til de tjenesteydelser, som transportvirksomhederne yder passagererne, kan begrunde en sådan forskel.
(2) By failing to take account, when transposing Directive 80/778, of the binding nature of Annex I so far as Group Water Schemes are concerned, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(6) and 19 of Directive 80/778 and under the Treaty.
Det forhold, at passagerer på skibe, der anløber en havn i et tredjeland eller har en sådan havn som endeligt bestemmelsessted, pålægges havneafgifter, der er forskellige fra dem, der pålægges passagerer, der har indenlandske havne eller havne i andre medlemsstater som, bestemmelsessted, uden at der er sammenhæng mellem denne forskel og omkostningerne ved de havnetjenesteydeker, der ydes ae pågældende passagergrupper, udgør en restriktion for den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser, der er i strid med artikel 1 i forordning nr. 4055/86.
Preliminary ruling (Transport — Maritime transport — Freedom to provide services — Restriction — National legislation applicable to all persons providing services, irrespective of their nationality, that distinguishes between domestic or intra-Community transport and transport to third countries) (Sixth Chamber)
1 henhold til artikel 1 i forordning nr. 4055/86 må der ikke for befordring, hvis bestemmelsessted er havne i tredjelande, pålægges havneafgifter, der varierer alt efter afstanden til havnene eller deres geografiske beliggenhed, såfremt forskellen mellem de pågældende afgifter ikke er objektivt begrundet i en forskellig behandling afpassagererne på grundlag af deres bestemmelsessted eher det sted, hvorfra de kommer.*
By order of 10 July 2000 the Diikitiko Protodikio Rodou (Administrative Court of First Instance, Rhodes) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC three questions on the interpretation of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986.
En national ordning, der fastsætter højere havneafgifter for passagerer med bestemmelsessted i et tredjeland end for passagerer med et indenlandsk bestemmelsessted, uden at der er sammenhæng mellem omkostningerne ved de havnetjenesteydelser, der ydes de pågældende passagerer, og de afgifter, som de respektive passagerer skal betale, udgør en restriktion for den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser, der er i strid med artikel 1, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 4055/86.«
By assessment of 1 August 1996, the Dodecanese Harbour Fund found that there was a shortfall in the harbour dues payable by, amongst others, Mr Georgiou, representing Geha Naftiliaki EPE and Total Scope NE, and Charalambis Bros OE. That finding was approved on 5 August 1996 by the regional director for the Dodecanese.
Sag C-112/01 SPKR 4 nr. 3482 ApS / Skatteministeriet, Told- og Skattestyrelsen, Aktieselskabet af 11/9 1996, Arden Transport & Spedition ved Søren Lauritsen og Lene Lauritsen I/S (ATS) Frie varebevægelser
By the action brought before the national court, the applicants in the main proceedings request that the decisions referred to in the foregoing paragraph be annulled and that certain sums paid in harbour dues be refunded.
Præjudiciel »Forordning (EØF) nr. 2913/92 og (EØF) nr. 2454/93 — ekstern fællesskabsforsendelse overtrædelse eller uregelmæssighed — opkrævning af toldskyld — betingelser* (Sjette Afdeling)
They take the view that the harbour dues should have been calculated on the basis of Article 6(2)(A) of Law No 2399/1996, that is to say at 5% on the price of the ticket, and not on the basis of Article 6(2)(B)(a) of that Law, that is to say at GRD 5 000 for each passenger, since the vessels were chartered under a full charter by tourist agencies for the purpose of day excursions from Rhodes to Turkey and back, and the final destination of those vessels was Rhodes, a domestic port, and not Turkey.
Hovedsagen og de præjudicielle spørgsmål
Since Article 1(1) of Regulation No 4055/86 has extended the principle of the freedom to provide services as regards intra-Community traffic to traffic between a Member State and a third country, the rules established in relation to the former must be applied to the latter.