natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det andet har appellanterne gjort gældende, at Retten i præmis 67 i den appellerede dom fejlagtigt antog, at »beslutningens lovlighed skal vurderes under hensyntagen til samtlige de regler, der var pålagt Kommissionen inden for dette område, herunder de med de russiske myndigheder indgåede aftaler«. Hvis dette var tilfældet, ville forpligtelser i henhold til kontrakt,
The Court observes, as a preliminary point, that the criterion requiring adherence to the principle of free competition in the conclusion of contracts is crucial to the proper functioning of the lending mechanism established by the Community.
der fremgår af dokumenter, der ikke er offentliggjort, kunne påberåbes over for tredjemand.
VEB of the new contractual terms on 22 and 26 March 1993, it did not receive the responses, favourable or unfavourable, given by at least three independent undertakings.
Ifølge Kommissionen tilkom det Retten at foretage en objektiv bedømmelse af lovligheden af den anfægtede beslutning under hensyntagen til samtlige de regler, der var pålagt Kommissionen, herunder reglerne i rammeaftalen.
designed, more generally, to guarantee the optimum use of the funds made available by the Community for aid to the Republics of the former Soviet Union. In actual fact, it is intended to protect both the Community as lender and the Republics in question as recipients of food and medical aid.
Ifølge Kommissionen fremgår det klart af præmis 74 i den appellerede dom, at Retten foretog en indgående undersøgelse af telefaxen af 9. marts 1993.
The applicants claim, however, that the principle of free competition was adhered to, since each of them was obliged to match the lowest price offered.
Retten konkluderede, at telefaxen ikke gjorde det »muligt at bevise, at hvert tillæg var blevet aftalt efter et udbud i konkurrence mellem mindst tre uafhængige firmaer«.
Consequently, fulfilment of that criterion is clearly not merely a formal obligation but in fact an essential element of the implementation of the lending mechanism.
For så vidt angår Rettens hensyntagen til de aftaler, der var indgået med de russiske myndigheder, i forbindelse med bedømmelsen af
Nevertheless, that shows, at most, that negotiations took place between Exportkhleb and each applicant before each of the contracts was concluded.
For det fjerde har appellanterne gjort gældende, at Retten foretog en urigtig bedømmelse af beviserne vedrørende spørgsmålet om overholdelse af den frie konkurrence.
Having rejected the pleas in law put forward in support of the applications for annulment, the Court of First Instance concluded, at paragraph 126 of the judgment under appeal, that Glencore and Compagnie Continentale had failed to prove 'any wrongful conduct on the part of the Commission'.
De har gjort gældende, at Retten burde have taget hensyn til de særlige forhold ved det pågældende udbud, der skulle klare en nødsituation.
Consequently, it rejected the application for compensation for the material damage alleged.
Behovet var så enormt, at en enkelt grossist aldrig ville have kunnet opfylde det.
The actions in Cases T-491/93, T-494/93 and T61/98 were therefore dismissed in their entirety.
Tillæggene til kontrakterne burde også være anset for parallelle bestemmelser i tilknytning til kontrakterne, og ikke adskilt fra dem, i modsætning til, hvad Retten fastslog i præmis 68 og 74 i den appellerede dom.
Thus, in the telefax which it sent to the Commission on 9 March 1993 in order to point out the changes made to the contracts, Exportkhleb merely referred to the contracts concluded with each undertaking.
Exportkhleb havde anmodet om bud fra mere end tre leverandører, idet selskabet havde indkaldt elleve hvedegrossister, der alle var konkurrenter på hvedemarkedet, til et møde i Bruxelles den 22. og 23. februar 1993.
In respect of each contract, mention was made only of the bid submitted by the undertaking to which the contract was awarded and the terms agreed following the negotiations between Exportkhleb and the undertaking in question.
Syv af de elleve grossister afgav bud, fem af dem indgik samtidig en kontrakt med Exportkhleb, og fire grossister undlod at afgive bud af grunde, der
Furthermore, the Commission has stated, without being challenged in that regard, that, upon being officially notified by the
Betingelserne med hensyn til priserne på de internationale markeder og vedrørende fri konkurrence, som nærværende sag drejer sig om, er fastsat i artikel 5 i denne forordning.
They take the contrary view that the two conditions are inextricably linked, the condition relating to prices on the international markets making it possible to check whether the condition relating to free competition has been complied with, those prices reflecting, according to the applicants, the results of world-wide free and fair competition.
Appellanterne har gjort gældende, at Retten tilsidesatte procesreglementets artikel 68, stk. 1, ved ikke at bestemme, at der skulle foretages afhøring af vidner såsom Exportkhleb eller en eller flere af de grossister, der havde deltaget i mødet i Bruxelles den 22. og 23. februar 1993.
Secondly, the appellants argue that the Court of First Instance erred in holding, at paragraph 67 of the judgment under appeal, that '[t]he legality of the decision must be assessed in the light of all the rules needing to be complied with by the Commission in the matter, including those relating to the agreements concluded with the Russian authorities'.
Hvis der var blevet foretaget en sådan vidneafhøring, ville Retten have kunnet fastslå, at de havde deltaget i et udbud i konkurrence med et betydeligt antal andre grossister.
To make such an assertion is tantamount to making contractual conditions contained in unpublished documents capable of operating against third parties.
Med hensyn til klagepunktet om, at Retten ikke undersøgte, om Kommissionen havde fulgt sin egen administrative praksis og havde indrømmet ret til kontradiktion, skal det blot konstateres, at dette klagepunkt ikke blev fremført for Retten.
According to the Commission, it was for the Court of First Instance to make an objective assessment of the legality of the contested decision in the light of all the rules needing to be complied with by the Commission, including those contained in the Memorandum of Understanding.
Appellanterne har ikke til støtte for deres tredje anbringende fremlagt nogen oplysninger til godtgørelse af, at Retten gengav beviserne forkert, eller at dens konstateringer må anses for materielt urigtige på baggrund af de fremlagte dokumenter.
The Commission submits that it is clear from Article 5 of Regulation No 1897/92 that the two conditions are different in nature, the condition relating to free competition concerning the procedure for the conclusion of the contracts, and the condition relating to international market prices concerning the content of the contracts.
Med hensyn til det fjerde led af det andet anbringende bemærkes, at formålet med appellanternes argumenter er at anfægte fastlæggelsen og vurderingen af de faktiske omstændigheder, på grundlag af hvilke Retten fandt, at Kommissionen med rette havde kunnet anse betingelsen vedrørende overholdelse af den frie konkurrence for ikke at være opfyldt.
It is clear from the wording of Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1897/92 that, by contrast with the condition relating to international market prices, the condition relating to free competition must be understood as a procedural, rather than a substantive rule.
Appellanterne har gjort gældende, at under hensyn til deres anbringender til støtte for appelsagerne burde Retten have tilpligtet Kommissionen at betale erstatning for den skade, der blev forvoldt ved den anfægtede beslutning.
Thirdly, the appellants complain that the Court failed to take account of the Commission's administrative practice and the obligations arising therefrom and of the rights of the defence.
De har nedlagt påstand om, at sagen hjemvises til Retten med henblik på sagens afgørelse i første instans for så vidt angår erstatningspåstanden, eller at Domstolen selv træffer afgørelse på dette punkt, hvis den finder dette mere hensigtsmæssigt.
They maintain that the Commission ought, in accordance with its administrative practice, to have requested from them other documents in addition to the amended contracts and ought to have conducted a more thoroughgoing enquiry, rather than simply wait passively for information to be supplied to it.
Det bemærkes hertil blot, at Fællesskabets ansvar uden for kontraktforhold bl.a. forudsætter, at den adfærd, som institutionen kritiseres for at have udvist, var retsstridig (jf. bl.a. dom af 15.9.1994, sag C-146/91, KYDEP mod Rådet og Kommissionen, præmis 19).
The appellants complain that the Court of First Instance found that it had not been shown that the Commission had made any error in concluding that the principle of free competition had not been observed when the riders to the contracts were concluded.
Det fremgår af artikel 225 EF og af artikel 51, stk. 1, i EF-statutten for Domstolen, at Domstolen ikke har kompetence til at fastlægge de faktiske omstændigheder og i princippet heller ikke til at bedømme de beviser, Retten har lagt til grund ved fastlæggelsen af de faktiske omstændigheder.
The Commission maintains that this plea, unconnected with any issue of public policy, was not put forward at first instance and must therefore be regarded as a new plea and rejected as inadmissible. In any event, the appellants have failed to show in what way the Commission departed from its usual administrative practice or failed to have regard for the rights of the defence.
Når disse beviser er blevet forskriftsmæssigt tilvejebragt, og de almindelige retsgrundsætninger og de processuelle regler om bevisbyrde og bevisførelse er blevet overholdt, er det alene Retten, der har kompetence til at vurdere, hvilken bevisværdi der skal tillægges de oplysninger, den har fået forelagt (dom af 17.12.1998, sag C-185/95 P, Baustahlgewebe mod Kommissionen, præmis 24).
First of all, according to the appellants, the Court was wrong to find, at paragraph 68 of the judgment under appeal, that the condition relating to observance of the principle of free competition required, for each contract, that offers be submitted from at least three independent undertakings.
Rettens vurdering heraf udgør derfor ikke et retsspørgsmål, der som sådant er undergivet Domstolens prøvelsesret, medmindre oplysningerne er gengivet forkert.
Neither Decision 91/658 nor Regulation No 1897/92 imposes such a requirement.
Appellanterne har ikke godtgjort, hvorved det af betragtningerne fremsat af Retten skulle fremgå, at Retten gengav beviserne forkert.
The riders ought therefore to have been regarded as parallel to and connected with the contracts, rather than separate from them as the Court found in paragraphs 68 and 74 of the
Da det ikke under gennemgangen af appellanternes anbringender til støtte for appelsagerne har kunnet fastslås, at Kommissionen havde gjort sig skyldig i et retsstridigt forhold, findes det at være med rette, at Retten frifandt for sagsøgernes påstand om erstatning for den skade, de gjorde gældende at have lidt.
The Commission, on the other hand, submits that that requirement is indeed set out in Article 5(1) of Regulation No 1897/92, the seventh indent of Article 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding and Clause 5.1(a), read together with Schedule 2-A, of the loan agreement.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
of them requiring the Commission's authorisation'.
»1) Appellerne forkastes.
The conditions relating to international market prices and free competition, which are at the centre of the present dispute, are set out in Article 5 of Regulation No 1897/92.
Glencore Grain Ltd betaler sagsomkostningerne i sag C-24/01 P, og Continentale (France) SA betaler sagsomkostningerne i sag C-25/01 P.«
Exportkhleb did indeed solicit offers from more than three suppliers: it called eleven cereal traders, all of them competing in the wheat market, to a meeting on 22 and 23 February 1993 in Brussels.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdelinel den 11. juli 2002.
Lastly, Exportkhleb managed to ensure that the riders to the contracts were concluded at the lowest of the prices offered by those traders.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
All of the foregoing is evidence that there was free competition.
Sag C-333/00 Eila Päivikki Maaheimo Social sikring af vandrende arbejstagere og selvstændige erhvervsdrivende
As regards the complaint that the Court of First Instance failed to check whether the Commission had followed its usual administrative practice and had had regard for the rights of the defence, suffice it to observe that that complaint was not raised at first instance.
Præjudiciel »Forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 — familieydelser — ydelse f or pasning af børn i hjemmet — bopælskrav for barnet« (Sjette Afdeling)
Coming to the fourth part of the second plea, it is appropriate to point out that the appellants seek by their arguments to challenge the determination and assessment of the facts which led the Court of First Instance to find that the Commission was entitled to take the view that the condition relating to observance of the precepts of free competition had not been satisfied.
Ved afgørelse af 31. maj 2000 har Tarkastuslautakunta (herefter »kontrolnævnet for social sikring«) forelagt tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 4, stk. 1, litra h), artikel 10a, 73 og 75 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971.
In this case, however, at paragraph 68 of the judgment under appeal, the Court of First Instance found, in the exercise of its exclusive jurisdiction, that '[t]he riders concluded with the various Community undertakings constitute, in relation to one another, specific contracts, each
Eila Maaheimo, der er sagsøger i hovedsagen, hendes mand og hendes børn er alle finske statsborgere. I kraft af sin forældreorlov har hun kunnet passe sine børn i hjemmet.
Under Article 225 EC and the first paragraph of Article 51 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice the latter thus has no jurisdiction to establish the facts or, in principle, to examine the evidence which the Court of First Instance accepted in support of those facts.
individuel og skønsmæssig bedømmelse af deres personlige behov.
The claim for damages save where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted, a point of law which is subject as such to review by the Court of Justice.
Ved afgørelse af 27. august 1998 besluttede Folkepensionsanstalten med virkning fra den 10. august 1998 at standse udbetalingen af ydelsen for pasning af børn i hjemmet til Eila Maaheimo.
The appellants have thus failed to show in what way the findings by the Court of First Instance indicate that the clear sense of the evidence submitted to the Court was distorted.
Den tager faktisk sigte på udligning af forsørgerbyrder i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i forordningens artikel 1, litra u), nr. i).
Infringement of Article 68(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance
Den klage, som Eila Maaheimo indgav over denne afgørelse til Sygesikringsnævnet, blev afvist ved afgørelse af 1. marts 1999.
The appellants maintain that, in view of the pleas which they put forward in support of their appeals, the Court of First Instance ought to have ordered the Commission to pay damages by way of compensation for the harm caused by the contested decision.
Den 31. marts 1999 indbragte sagsøgeren sagen for kontrolnævnet for social sikring med påstand om, at afgørelsen fra Sygesikringsnævnet annulleres, og at Folkepensionsanstalten tilpligtes fortsat at udbetale ydelsen.
They call upon the Court of Justice to refer the case back to the Court of First Instance to rule on the claims for damages made at first instance or itself rule on the point, should it regard that as appropriate.
Det er under disse omstændigheder, at kontrolnævnet, der er et uafhængigt organ, der i sidste instans træffer afgørelse i sager vedrørende ydelse for pasning af børn i hjemmet, har besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen tre præjudicielle spørgsmål.
Suffice it to observe that the Community can incur non-contractual liability only if, inter alia, the acts alleged against the institution in question were unlawful (see, inter alia, Case C-146/91KYDEP ν Council and Commission [1994], paragraph 19).
Et af formålene med lov om ydelse for pasning af børn i hjemmet er ganske rigtigt tilrettelæggelsen af børnenes pasning. Det fremgår imidlertid af forelæggelsesafgørelsen, at ydelsen for pasning af børn i hjemmet ligeledes har til formål at yde godtgørelse for udgifter i forbindelse med pasning og opdragelse og således at mildne de økonomiske ulemper.
This Court's review of the pleas put forward by the appellants in support of their appeals has not enabled it to establish the existence of any unlawful conduct on the Commission's part and the Court of First Instance was therefore right to reject their application for compensation of the harm they allegedly suffered.
Der synes følgelig at være en så snæver forbindelse mellem forsørgerbyrderne og den i hovedsagen omhandlede ydelse, at en ydelse som ydelsen for pasning af børn i hjemmet må anses for at være en familieydelse i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i artikel 4, stk. 1, litra h), i forordning nr. 1408/71.
In support of their third plea the appellants have offered no evidence to show that the clear sense of the evidence submitted to the Court was distorted or that there was any substantive inaccuracy of the Court's findings in light of the documents in the case-file.
Det andet spørgsmål
Dismisses the appeals;
Det fremgår af artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71, at en arbejdstager, der er omfattet af en medlemsstats lovgivning, for de af sine familiemedlemmer, der er bosiddende på en anden medlemsstats område, har ret til familieydelser efter lovgivningen i førstnævnte stat, som om de pågældende var bosiddende på dennes område.
Orders Glencore Grain Ltd to pay the costs in Case C-24/01 Ρ and Compagnie Continentale (France) SA to pay the costs in Case C-25/01 P.'
bestemmelse (jf. Hoever og Zachow-dommen, præmis 38).
Case C-333/00 Eila Päivikki Maaheimo Social Security for Migrant Workers
artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71 også anvendelse på en arbejdstager, som bor med sin familie i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvis lovgivning han er omfattet af.
Preliminary ruling (Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 condition for children) (Sixth Chamber)
Når dette er tilfældet, kan arbejdstagerens ægtefælle ligeledes påberåbe sig den pågældende
That decision was taken under Article 3(1) of the Law on home child-care allowance on the ground that the children were not actually resident in Finland.
En person, der befinder sig i en situation som den, sagsøgeren i hovedsagen befinder sig i, kan følgelig påberåbe sig artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71.
By order of 31 May 2000, the Tarkastuslautakunta (Social Security Review Tribunal) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Articles 4(l)(h), 10(a), 73 and 75 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971.
»1) En ydelse som den ydelse for pasning af børn i hjemmel, der er omhandlet i laki (1128/1996) lasten kotihoidon ja yksityisen hoidon tuesta (lov om ydelse f or pasning af børn i hjemmet og privat pasning af børn) er en familieydelse i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i artikel 4, stk 1, litra h), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved. Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 118/97 af 2 december 1996
In those circumstances the Tarkastuslautakunta, an independent body ruling at final instance on appeals on the home child-care allowance decided to stay its proceedings and to refer a number of questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
2) Artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71, som ændret og ajourført ved forordning nr. 118/97, skal fortolkes således, at hvis tildeling af en ydelse som den i hovedsagen omhandlede ydelse for pasning af børn i hjemmet er underlagt en betingelse om, at barnet skal have faktisk bopæl på den kompetente medlemsstats område, skal denne betingelse anses for at være opfyldt, når barnet opholder sig på en anden medlemsstats område.«
By its first question, the national court asks, essentially, whether an allowance such as the home child-care allowance at issue in the main proceedings can be regarded as a family benefit for the purposes of Article 4(l)(h) of Regulation No 1408/71.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 7. marts 2002.
In that regard, it must be observed that, according to settled case-law, a benefit can be the to
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
By decision of Kansaneläkelaitos
Sag C-348/01 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
The second question regarded as a social security benefit only if it is granted, without any individual and discretionary assessment of personal needs, to recipients on the basis of a legally defined position (see, in this regard, Case C-78/91 Hughes [1992], paragraph 15, and Case C-85/99 Offermanns [2001]).
»Traktatbrud — direktiv 97/11/EF indvirkning på miljøet — mangelfuld (Sjette Afdeling) artikel 1, nr. 7, i direktiv 97/11, for så vidt som den ændrer artikel 5, stk. 2, i direktiv 85/337 ved at indføre en justeringsprocedure på bygherrernes anmodning artikel 1, nr. 11, i direktiv 97/11 om ændring af artikel 9 i direktiv 85/337, hvorved det foreskrives, at begrundelserne for den trufne afgørelse gøres tilgængelige for offentligheden
Under Article 14(1) (a) of Regulation No 1408/71, a person employed in the territory of a Member State by an undertaking to which he is normally attached who is posted by that undertaking to the territory of another Member State to perform work there for that undertaking shall continue to be subject to the legislation — Finnish legislation in the case in the main proceedings — of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of that work does not exceed 12 months.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 17. september 2001 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i henhold til artikel 226 EF anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Franske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 97/11/EF af 3. marts 1997, idet den ikke har vedtaget de love eller administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivet, eller ikke har underrettet Kommissionen herom.
A benefit such as the home child-care allowance in question in the main proceedings satisfies that condition: the provisions concerning the grant of that allowance confers on the recipients a legally defined right and care money and the care supplement are paid automatically to persons who fulfil certain objective criteria, without any individual and discretionary assessment of individual needs.
bilag II, stk. 1, litra b) og d), og stk. 3, litra i), til direktiv 97/11, således at projekter vedrørende inddragning af uopdyrket land eller delvise naturområder til intensiv landbrugsvirksomhed, nyplantning af skov og vindmølleparker dækkes, for andre projekter end dem, der vedrører godkendelsespligtige anlæg.
According to Article 73 of Regulation No 1408/71, a worker subject to the legislation of a Member State is to be entitled to the family benefits provided for by the legislation of the first Member State for members of his family residing in the territory of another Member State, as though they were residing in the territory of the first State.
Idet Kommissionen ikke anså direktiv 97/11 for at være blevet gennemført rettidigt i fransk ret, indledte den en traktatbrudsprocedure.
A benefit such as that at issue in the main proceedings also comes within the definition of family benefits and therefore relates to the risk mentioned in Article 4(l)(h) of Regulation No 1408/71.