natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For så vidt som spørgsmålet henviser til de portugisiske myndigheders beslutning om at indlede efteropkrævningsproceduren, bemærkes, at associeringsaftalens artikel 25, der fastsætter betingelserne for, hvornår en sag kan indbringes for Associeringsrådet, bestemmer, at de kontraherende parter kan anmode sidstnævnte om at træffe afgørelse om enhver uoverensstemmelse vedrørende aftalens anvendelse eller fortolkning.
Preliminary ruling (EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Importation of television sets from Turkey — Determination of the person liable for the customs debt — Post-clearance recovery of customs duties) (Fifth Chamber) payment of customs duties relating to the importation totalling PTE 7 534 264.
Denne betingelse indebærer, at klarereren skal meddele de kompetente toldmyndigheder alle oplysninger, der er nødvendige ifølge fællesskabsreglerne og de nationale regler.
By order of 13 March 2000 the Tribunal Tributário de Primeira Instância de Lisboa referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling five questions on the interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code ('the CCC') and on the validity of a Commission decision.
Det fremgår af ordlyden af nævnte bestemmelse, at der består en mulighed for, men ikke en pligt til, at indbringe en sag for Associeringsrådet.
That collection order was issued on the basis of a finding by the Commission, forwarded to the Portuguese customs authorities, according to which the goods did not fulfil the conditions for the preferential treatment provided for by the Association Agreement and Additional Protocol.
Det fremgår af forelæggelseskendelsen og ordlyden af det første spørgsmål, at den nationale ret er af den opfattelse, at denne betingelse er opfyldt.
Those questions were raised in proceedings between Ilumitrónica — Iluminação e Electrónica L­ ('Ilumitrónica'), a company governed by Portuguese law, and the Chefe da Divisão de Procedimentos Aduaneiros e Fiscais/Direcção das Alfândegas de Lisboa concerning the post­clearance recovery of customs duties in respect of the importation, in 1992, of a consignment of television sets from Turkey.
Det femte spørgsmål
The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred
»1) Artikel 5, stk 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1697/79 af 24. juli 1979 om efteropkrævning af import- og eksportafgifter, der ikke er opkrævet hos debitor for varer, der er angivet til en toldprocedure, som medfører en forpligtelse til at betale sådanne afgifter, skal fortolkes således:
The goods were accompanied by an ATR.l certificate, on the basis of which they were granted preferential treatment, in accordance with the Association Agreement and the Additional Protocol, as ratified by the Portuguese Republic by Decree No 3/92 of 21 January 1992.
Ved afgørelsen af, om der er begået en sådan fejl, indgår som et element, at eksportlandets myndigheder systematisk har udstedt attester, der berettiger til anvendelse af en præferenceordning i forbindelse med en associeringsaftale, selv om myndighederne for det første burde have vidst, at der i eksportlandet fandtes
By its first question, the court making the reference seeks in essence to ascertain whether it is permissible to require a trader who acts in good faith and with due care to pay customs duties which have become payable as the result
en politik til eksportfremme, som indebar, at der toldfrit blev indført komponenter med oprindelse i tredjelande, som skulle indgå i varer, der var bestemt til eksport til Fællesskabet, og for det andet burde have vidst, at der i eksportlandet ikke fandtes bestemmelser, der gjorde det muligt at opkræve den udligningsafgift, som påhvilede de varer, der var omfattet af præferenceordningen for eksport til Fællesskabet.
Whilst it is in principle for the national court to make that assessment, in this case the Court has all the information needed for that purpose. A number of circumstances permit the inference that the error made by the Turkish authorities was not, in some cases, detectable, even to an experienced professional trader such as Ilumitrónica.
Ved afgørelsen af, om debitor ikke med rimelighed kunne forventes at have opdaget en sådan fejl, indgår som et element den omstændighed, at visse af associeringsordmngens bestemmelser ikke var blevet offentliggjort i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende, og at de nævnte bestemmelser ikke var blevet gennemført, eller ikke var blevet korrekt gennemført, i eksportlandet i mere end 20 år.
The Court has already held that, since no precise and exhaustive definition of 'competent authorities' is provided in Regulation No 1697/79 or in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2164/91 of 23 July 1991 laying down provisions for the implementation of Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1697/79, not only the authorities competent for taking action for recovery but any authority which, acting within the scope of its powers, furnishes information relevant to the recovery of customs duties and which may thus cause the person liable to entertain legitimate expectations must be regarded as a 'competent authority' within the meaning of Article 5(2) of that regulation.
2) Den adfærd, der er udvist af eksportlandets myndigheder, er uden betydning for afgørelsen af, hvem der er debitor for toldskyld, og dermed for importlandets myndigheders mulighed for at foretage en efteropkrævning af det skyldige afgiftsbeløb.
Whilst it is in principle for the national court to establish whether or not an error has been made by the competent authorities, in this case the Court has all the information needed to make that assessment.
3) En medlemsstats toldmyndigheder, der handler efter henstilling fra Kommissionen, er ikke i henhold til artikel 22 og 25 i aftalen om oprettelse af en associering mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Tyrkiet forpligtet til at anvende den herifastsatte procedure, inden de foretager en efteropkrævning af importafgiften*
By its fifth question, the court making the reference queries the validity of both the Commission decision and that of the Portuguese authorities, acting on the Commission's advice, to take action for post-clearance recovery of the customs duties without first initiating the procedure provided for in Articles 22 and 25 of the Association Agreement.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 24. januar 2002.
It must be held that by not raising, as a matter of routine practice, any objections to the statements contained in the declaration relating to the import at issue in the main proceedings, the authorities which issued the A.TR.1 certificate based their certification of the origin of the goods on a misinterpretation of the relevant
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Consequently, the Court is unable to adjudicate on this point.
Ved dom af 27. juni 2000 har Hofvan Beroep te Antwerpen i medfør af protokollen af 3. juni 1971 vedrørende Domstolens fortolkning af konventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgerlige sager, herunder handelssager, forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af konventionens artikel 1 (herefter »Bruxelles-konventionen«).
It must therefore be held that the authorities of the importing State retain the right to take action for post-clearance recovery on the basis of the results of checks carried out after the import transactions, without being obliged to have recourse to the mechanism for settling disputes provided for by the Association Agreement (see, to that effect, Pascoal & Filhos, paragraph 38). In so far as the question refers to the decision of the Portuguese authorities to initiate the procedure for post-clearance recovery, Article 25 of the Association Agreement, which lays down the conditions governing the submission of disputes to the Association Council, provides that the Contracting Parties may submit to the latter any dispute relating to the application or interpretation of the agreement.
Ved kendelse af 22. juli 1996 tilpligtede Arrondissementsrechtbank te Breda Luc Baten at betale Steenbergen kommune de beløb, der var udbetalt til Helena Kil og hendes barn i form af social bistand.
It follows from the wording of that provision that it provides for a possibility and not an obligation of submission.
Denne afgørelse begærede Luc Baten genoptaget. Ved domme af 17. marts og 23. juni 1999 gav Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Turnhout Luc Baten medhold under genoptagelsessagen, idet retten lagde til grund, at det ikke var muligt at fuldbyrde den af Arrondissementsrechtbank te Breda afsagte kendelse af 22. juli 1996, »fordi kendelsen er uforenelig med dommen af 14. maj 1987 om skilsmisse efter fælles aftale, der indirekte omfatter og bekræfter det officielt bekræftede dokument, som notar [...] har udstedt den 25. marts 1986«.
Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1697/79 of 24 July 1979 on the post-clearance recovery of import duties or export duties which have not been required of the person liable for payment on goods entered for a customs procedure involving the obligation to pay such duties must be interpreted as meaning that: in order to determine whether there is an "error made by the competent authorities themselves'', account must be taken both of the conduct of the customs authorities which issued the certificate permitting the application of preferential treatment and of that of the central customs authorities; the routine issuing by the authorities of the exporting country of certificates permitting the application of preferential treatment under association rules constitutes evidence of such an error when those authorities must have been aware, on the one hand, of the existence in the exporting country of a policy of encouragingexports, involving the duty-free importation of components originating in third countries for incorporation in goods intended for export to the Community and, on the other hand, of the absence in the exporting country of provisions enabling collection of the compensatory levy to which the application of preferential treatment to exports to the Community of goods thus obtained was subject; the fact that some of the relevant provisions of the association rules were not published in the Official Journal of the European Communities and the circumstance that those provisions were not implemented, or were implemented incorrectly, in the exporting country over a period of more than 20 years constitute evidence that such an error could not reasonably have been detected by the person liable.
på hvilket grundlag - har indfriet en skyld, der påhviler en anden, og indtræder i den oprindelige fordringshavers rettigheder, eller til retsstillingen for den, som har lidt skade på grund af en handling eller en undladelse, der må tilregnes en tredjemand, og som kræver skaden erstattet af denne.
Articles 22 and 25 of the Agreement establishing an association between the European Economic Community and Turkey do not require the national customs authorities of a Member State, acting on the Commissions advice, to have recourse to the procedure provided for by those articles before taking action for post-clearance recovery of import duties.'
Herefter besluttede Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen at udsætte sagen og at forelægge Domstolen to præjudicielle spørgsmål.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 24 January 2002.
Domstolen har fundet, at selv om visse afgørelser i tvister mellem en offentlig myndighed og en privatperson kan falde ind under konventionens anvendelsesområde, forholder det sig anderledes, når den offentlige myndighed udøver offentligretlige beføjelser.
Case C-271/00 Gemeente Steenbergen ν Luc Baten Judgments Convention/Enforcement of judgments
Med henblik på at afgøre, om dette er tilfældet i en sag som hovedsagen, hvorunder et offentligretligt organ over for en privatperson søger at inddrive beløb, som organet i form af social bistand har udbetalt til denne persons fraskilte ægtefælle og barn, skal der derfor tages stilling til, på hvilket grundlag og efter hvilke nærmere regler søgsmålet iværksættes.
Preliminary ruling (Brussels Convention — Scope — Action under a right of recourse under national legislation providing for payment of allowances by way of social assistance — Concept of civil matters — Concept of social security) (Fifth Chamber) against Mr Baten, resident in Belgium, in order to recover sums of money paid by that authority, by way of social assistance, to the divorced spouse and the child of Mr Baten.
I denne forbindelse bestemmes det i ABW's artikel 93, at der for udgifter til social bistand gøres regres indtil grænsen for underholdspligten som omhandlet i den nederlandske borgerlige lovbogs første bog.
The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Med dette spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om begrebet »social sikring« i Bruxelles-konventionens artikel 1, stk. 2, nr. 3, omfatter er regressøgsmål, hvorved et offentligretligt organ over for en privatperson søger at inddrive beløb, som organet i form af social bistand har udbetalt til denne persons fraskilte ægtefælle og barn.
By order of 27 June 2000 the Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen (Court of Appeal, Antwerp) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling pursuant to the Protocol of 3 June 1971 on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters two questions on the interpretation of Article 1 of the abovementioned Convention of 27 September 1968 (hereinafter 'the Brussels Convention').
Med hensyn til de nærmere regler for, hvordan regressøgsmålet kan iværksættes, bestemmes det i ABW's artikel 103, at sagen skal anlægges ved civilretterne, og at den er undergivet civilprocessens regler.
Those questions were raised in a legal action under a right of recourse brought by Gemeente Steenbergen, a Netherlands local authority,
Det offentligretlige organs retsstilling over for den, der har underholdspligt, svarer til retsstillingen for en privatperson, som — uanset
The marriage between Mr Baten and Mrs Kil was dissolved by a divorce decree granted by consent on 14 May 1987 by a Belgian court.
Det må antages, at indholdet af begrebet »social sikring« i Bruxelles-konventionens artikel 1, stk.2's forstand omfatter det materielle anvendelsesområde for forordning nr. 1408/71, således som det er fastlagt i forordningens artikel 4 og nærmere angivet i Domstolens praksis.
In the agreement prior to the divorce entered into on 25 March 1986 before a notary established in Belgium, the spouses agreed that no maintenance would be payable as between themselves and that
personer, der har fået udbetalt bistanden — ikke betingelserne for tildelingen af de pågældende ydelser, men et krav om godtgørelse for de således udbetalte beløb.
Mrs Kil and her child settled in the municipality of Steenbergen (Netherlands), which granted them an allowance by way of social assistance under the Algemene Bijstandswet (Law on general assistance, Staatsblad 1995, No 1999, p. 1, hereinafter the 'ABW').
Uafhængigt af, hvordan ydelser, der i form af social bistand er udredt af et offentligretligt organ til personer, der ikke har midler til deres underhold, skal kvalificeres i henhold til artikel 4 i forordning nr. 1408/71, er genstanden for et regressøgsmål, som af organet er iværksat over for en tredjemand — en privatperson i dennes egenskab af underholdspligtig over for de
In this question the referring court is, essentially, seeking to ascertain whether the concept of 'civil matters' in the first paragraph of Article 1 of the Brussels Convention encompasses an action under a right of recourse under which a public body seeks recovery from a private person of sums paid by it by way of social assistance to the divorced spouse and the child of that person.
Heraf følger under alle omstændigheder, at sagens genstand ikke vedrører anvendelsen af forordning nr. 1408/71.
The Court has held that, although certain judgments in actions between a public authority and a person governed by private law may come within the scope of the Brussels Convention, it is otherwise where the public authority is acting in the exercise of its public powers.
*1) Artikel 1, stk 1, i konventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgerlige sager, herunder handelssager, som ændret ved konventionen af 9. oktober 1978 om Kongeriget Danmarks, Irlands og Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirlands tiltrædelse og ved konventionen af 25. oktober 1982 om Den Hellenske Republiks tiltrædelse, skal fortolkes således, at begrebet »borgerlige sager* omfatter et regressøgsmål, hvorved et offentligretligt organ overfor en privatperson søger at inddrive beløb, som organet i form af social bistand har udbetalt til denne persons fraskilte ægtefælle og barn, for så vidt som grundtaget og de nærmere regler for iværksættelsen af søgsmålet er reguleret af de almindeligt gældende retsregler om underholdspligt Såfremt regressøgsmålet støttes på bestemmelser, hvorved lovgiver har tillagt det offentligretlige organ en selvstændig beføjelse, kan søgsmålet ikke anses for omfattet af begrebet »borgertige sager*.
In order to determine whether that is so in a case such as that in point in the main proceedings, in which a public body seeks from a person governed by private law recovery of sums paid by it by way of social assistance to the former spouse and the child of that person, it is necessary to examine the basis and the detailed rules governing the bringing of that action.
Konventionens artikel 1, stk. 2, nr. 3, skal fortolkes således, at begrebet »social sikring* ikke omfatter et regressøgsmål, hvorved et offentligretligt organ overfor en privatperson efter almindeligt gældende retsregler søger at inddrive beløb, som organet i form af social bistand har udbetalt til denne persons fraskilte ægtefælle og barn.*
As regards the detailed rules governing the bringing of an action under a right of recourse, Article 103 of the ABW states that that action must be brought before the civil courts and is that it governed by the rules of civil procedure.
Generaladvokat A Tizzano fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling
Accordingly, the legal situation of the public body vis-à-vis the person liable for maintenance is comparable to that of an individual who, having paid on whatever ground another's debt, is subrogated to the rights of the original creditor, or is comparable to the situation of a person who, having suffered loss as a result of an act or omission imputable to a third party, seeks reparation from that party.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
However, that finding calls for some qualification by reason of Article 94 of the ABW under which
Sag C-411/00 Felix Swoboda GmbH / Österreichische Nationalbank Regler for virksomhederne
Convention encompasses an action under a right of recourse by which a public body seeks from a person governed by private law recovery of sums paid by it by way of social assistance to the divorced spouse and the child of that person.
Præjudiciel »Offentlige tjenesteydelsesaftaler—direktiv 92/50/EØF—sagligt anvendelsesområde —flytning af en nationalbank — aftale, hvis genstand samtidig er tjenesteydelser, der er opført i bilag I A til direktiv 92/50, og tjenesteydelser, der er opført i bilag IB til dette direktiv — større værdi af de tjenesteydeL·er, som er opført i bilag 1B* (Femte Afdeling)
an agreement between spouses or former spouses for the purpose of precluding or limiting their maintenance obligations after their divorce does not preclude recovery from one of the parties and is without prejudice to determination of the amounts to be recovered.
Ved kendelse af 29. september 2000 har Bundesvergabeamt forelagt Domstolen fire præjudicielle spørgsmål om fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 92/50/EØF af 18. juni 1992.
It must be held that the substance of the concept of 'social security' in the second paragraph of Article 1 of the Brussels Convention encompasses the matters covered by Regulation No 1408/71, as defined in Article 4 thereof and clarified in the Court's case-law.
større værdi af tjenesteydelserne i henhold til bilag IV til BVergG)«, samtidig med, at ÖNB ved beskrivelsen af de tjenesteydelser, der var omfattet af kontrakten, henviste til CPV- referencenumrene63100000-0(Godsbehandling), 63210000-4 (Anden hjælpevirksomhed i forbindelse med landtransport), 63400000-3 (Anden transportformidling) og 60240000-2 (Vejgodstransport).
To the extent to which that provision allows the public body, in a proper case, to disregard an agreement lawfully entered into between spouses or former spouses, producing binding effects between them and enforceable against third parties, it places the public body in a legal situation which derogates from the ordinary law. That is all the more so inasmuch as that provision allows the public body to disregard an agreement approved by a judicial decision and covered by the force of res judicata attaching to that decision.
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst under en sag anlagt af selskabet Felix Swoboda GmbH mod Österreichische Nationalbank vedrørende sidstnævntes beslutning om at anvende udbud efter forhandling i forbindelse med indgåelse af en offentlig aftale, med henblik på udvælgelse af den tjenesteyder, som skulle gennemføre en flytning til nye lokaler ca. 200 meter fra den oprindelige placering.
However, irrespective of how, in the light of Article 4 of Regulation No 1408/71, benefits paid by way of social assistance by a public body to persons without resources are to be characterised, the action under a right of recourse brought by that body against a third party, a person governed by private law, as the subject of an obligation to pay maintenance to the persons assisted, is not concerned with the conditions under which the benefits in question are granted but with recovery of the sums paid in that regard.
Tvisten i hovedsagen og de præjudicielle spørgsmål
In this question the referring court is, essentially, seeking to ascertain whether the concept of 'social security' at point 3 of the second paragraph of Article 1 of the Brussels
Swoboda anlagde ved Bundesvergabeamt en sag, hvori selskabet anfægtede ÖNB's beslutning om tildeling af aftalen.
It follows that, in any event, the subject-matter of the dispute does not concern the application of Regulation No 1408/71.
Efter at ÖNB i efteråret 1996 havde afholdt et begrænset udbud med henblik på udvælgelse af den tjenesteyder, som skulle gennemføre en flytning fra ÖNB's lokaler i Wien (Østrig) til nye lokaler ca. 200 meter væk — hvilket udbud var blevet annulleret i marts 1997 — foretog den som led i et udbud efter forhandling tildeling af denne aftale og offentliggjorde i april 1997 en bekendtgørelse herom. I bekendtgørelsen henviste ÖNB, for så vidt angik den procedure, som var anvendt i forbindelse med tildelingen af aftalen, til »Verhandlungsverfahren für Dienstleistungen gemäß Paragraph lb (2) und (3) BVergG mit überwiegendem Wert der Dienstleitung nach Anhang IV/BVergG (udbud efter forhandling vedrørende tjenesteydelser i henhold til § Ib, stk. 2 og 3, i BVergG, med
The first paragraph of Article 1 of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and by the Convention of 25 October 1982 on the Accession of the Hellenic Republic, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of "civil matters'' encompasses an action under a right of recourse whereby a public body seeks from a person governed by private law recovery of sums paid by it by way of social assistance to the divorced spouse and the child of that person, provided that the basis and the detailed rules relating to the bringing of that action are governed by the rules of the ordinary law in regard to maintenance obligations.