F G� R E L S ER฀ -ED฀HENSYN฀ TIL฀ DET฀ F� R S T E ฀ ASPEKT฀ UDTALTE฀ 2ETTEN฀ AT฀ MEDMINDRE฀ DER฀ FORELIGGER฀ GANSKE฀ S� R LIGE฀ O M S T � N D I G H E DER฀ KAN฀ EN฀ B E D � M M E L S ES R A P PO R Tfi฀ IKKE฀ ANNULLERES฀ BLOT฀ FORDI฀ DEN฀ ER฀ U D F� R D I G ET฀ FOR฀ SENT฀ 3ELV฀ OM฀ EN฀ FORSINKET฀ U D F� R D I G E L SE฀ AF฀ B E D � M M E L S ES RAPPORTEN฀ KAN฀ T I L L � G G E ฀ DEN฀ B E R � R T E ฀ TJENESTEMAND฀ EN฀ RET฀ TIL฀ ERSTATNING฀ ELLER฀ G O D T G� R E L SE฀ KAN฀ EN฀ S� D AN฀ FORSINKELSE฀ IKKE฀ P �V I R K E ฀ B E D � M M E L S ES R A P PO R T E N S ฀ GYLDIGHED฀ OG฀ F�L G E L I G ฀ HELLER฀ IKKE฀ BEGRUNDE฀ AT฀ DEN฀ ANNULLERES฀ -ED฀HENSYN฀ TIL฀ DET฀ ANDET฀ ASPEKT฀ UNDERSTREGEDE฀ 2ETTEN฀ AT฀ EN฀ FORSINKET฀ U D F� R D I G E L SE฀ AF฀ B E D � M M E L S ES RAPPORTEN฀ KAN฀ M E D F� R E ฀ EN฀ IKKE � K O N O M I S K ฀ SKADE฀ FOR฀DEN฀ B E R � R T E ฀ TJENESTEMAND฀ OG฀ AT฀ A D M I N I S T R A T I O N EN฀ B E GIK฀ EN฀ T J E N S TL I G ฀ FE J L ฀ DER฀ KAN฀ M E D F� R E ฀ AT฀ DEN฀ IFALDER฀ ERSTATNINGSANSVAR฀ MEDMINDRE฀ DER฀ FO R E L � ฀ GANSKE฀ S� R LIGE฀ O M S T � N D I G H E DER฀ DER฀ KUNNE฀ BEGRUNDE฀ FO R SI N K E L S EN฀ )฀ DOMMENE฀ I฀ SAGERNE฀ DEN฀ (AMER฀ MOD฀+OMMISSIONEN OG ,A V A G N O L I฀ MOD฀+OMMISSIONEN฀ P R � C I S E R E DE฀ 2ETTEN฀ AT฀ DET฀ F R E M G� R ฀ AF฀ RETSPRAKSIS฀ AT฀ +OMMISSIONEN฀ P � ฀ BAGGRUND฀ AF฀ FORM U L E R INGEN฀ AF฀ VE D T � G T E N S ฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ HAR฀ EN฀ RIMELIG฀ FRIST฀ TIL฀AT฀ U D F� R D I G E ฀ B E D � M M E L S ES RAPPORTEN฀ FOR฀ SINE฀ T J E N ES T E M � N D ฀ MEN฀ AT฀ DENNE฀BESTEMMELSE฀ IKKE฀ FINDER฀ ANVENDELSE฀ N� R ฀ DER฀ FINDES฀ BESTEMMELSER฀ DER฀ER฀ BINDENDE฀ FOR฀ +OMMISSIONEN฀ SOM฀ FE K S ฀ DE฀ GENERELLE฀ G E NN E MF � R E L S ES BESTEMMELSER฀ OG฀ HVOREFTER฀ DER฀ FOR฀ A F V I K L INGEN฀ AF฀ B E D � M M E L S ES PROCEDUREN฀ G� L DER฀ KONKRETE฀ F R I S T ER฀ OG฀ ENHVER฀OVERSKRIDELSE฀AF฀DEN฀ FRIST฀ SOM฀ INSTITUTIONEN฀HAR฀ FASTSAT฀ FOR฀ SIG฀ SELV฀ DERFOR฀ M � ฀ T I L R E G N ES ฀ DEN฀
4HE฀#OURT฀ FIRST฀ INTERPRETED฀ THE฀CONCEPT฀OF฀ SUBSTANTIAL฀EQUIVALENCE฀ HOLDING฀ THAT฀ THE฀ CONCEPT฀ DOES฀NOT฀ PRECLUDE฀NOVEL฀ FOODS฀WHICH฀DISPLAY฀DIFFERENCES฀ IN฀ COMPOSITION฀ THAT฀ HAVE฀ NO฀ EFFECT฀ ON฀ PUBLIC฀ HEALTH฀ FROM฀BEING฀ CONSIDERED฀ SUBSTANTIALLY฀ EQUIVALENT฀ TO฀ EXISTING฀ FOODS฀ 4HE฀#OURT฀ FURTHER฀ SAID฀ THAT฀ THE฀CONCEPT฀OF฀ SUBSTANTIAL฀EQUIVALENCE฀ DOES฀NOT฀ IN฀ ITSELF฀ INVOLVE฀ A฀ SAFETY฀ ASSESSMENT฀ BUT฀ RATHER฀ CONSTITUTES฀ AN฀ APPROACH฀ FOR฀ COMPARING฀ THE฀ NOVEL฀ FOOD฀ WITH฀ ITS฀ CONVENTIONAL฀ COUNTERPART฀ IN฀ORDER฀ TO฀DETERMINE฀ WHETHER฀ IT฀SHOULD฀BE฀SUBJECT฀ TO฀ A฀ RISK฀ ASSESSMENT฀ AS฀ REGARDS฀ IN฀PARTICULAR฀ ITS฀UNIQUE฀ COMPOSITION฀ AND฀ P R O P E R T I E S ฀ 4HE฀#OURT฀ HELD฀ CONSEQUENTLY฀ THAT฀ THE฀ ABSENCE฀ OF฀ SUBSTANTIAL฀EQUIVALENCE฀ DOES฀NOT฀ NECESSARILY฀ IMPLY฀ THAT฀ THE฀ FOOD฀ IN฀QUESTION฀ IS฀ U N S A F E ฀ BUT฀ SIMPLY฀ THAT฀ IT฀SHOULD฀BE฀SUBJECT฀ TO฀ AN฀ ASSESSMENT฀ OF฀ ITS฀ POTENTIAL฀ RISKS฀ PARAGRAPH฀ ฀ AND฀ CONCLUDED฀ THAT฀ THE฀MERE฀ PRESENCE฀ IN฀NOVEL฀ FOODS฀OF฀ RESIDUES฀OF฀ TRANSGENIC฀ PROTEIN฀ AT฀ CERTAIN฀ LEVELS฀ DOES฀NOT฀ PRECLUDE฀ THOSE฀ FOODS฀ FROM฀BEING฀ CONSIDERED฀ SUBSTANTIALLY฀ EQUIVALENT฀ TO฀ EXISTING฀ FOODS฀ AND฀ CONSEQUENTLY฀ USE฀ OF฀ THE฀ SIMPLIFIED฀ PROCEDURE฀ FOR฀ P L A C IN G ฀ THOSE฀ NOVEL฀ FOODS฀ ON฀ THE฀MARKET฀ PARAGRAPH฀ ฀ ( O W E V E R ฀ THE฀#OURT฀STATED฀ THAT฀ THAT฀ IS฀ NOT฀ THE฀ CASE฀ WHERE฀ THE฀ EXISTENCE฀ OF฀ A฀ RISK฀ OF฀ POTENTIALLY฀ DANGEROUS฀ EFFECTS฀ ON฀ HUMAN฀ HEALTH฀ CAN฀ BE฀ IDENTIFIED฀ ON฀ THE฀BASIS฀OF฀ THE฀ SCIENTIFIC฀ KNOWLEDGE฀ AVAILABLE฀ AT฀ THE฀ TIME฀OF฀ THE฀ INITIAL฀ ASSESSMENT฀ AND฀ THAT฀ IT฀ IS฀ FOR฀ THE฀NATIONAL฀ COURT฀ TO฀DETERMINE฀ WHETHER฀ THAT฀ CONDITION฀ IS฀ SATISFIED฀