natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Retsmøderapporten offentliggøres på processproget i forbindelse med retsmødet.
The report is made public in the language of the case at the hearing.
Offentligt retsmøde og generaladvokatens forslag til afgørelse
The public hearing and the Advocate General’s opinion
Sagen procederes i et offentligt retsmøde, hvori dommerkollegiet og generaladvokaten deltager, medmindre sagen skal påkendes uden forslag til afgørelse fra en generaladvokat.
The case is argued at a public hearing, before the bench and the Advocate General.
Dommerne og generaladvokaten kan stille parterne de spørgsmål, som de finder hensigtsmæssige.
The judges and the Advocate General may put to the parties any questions they consider appropriate.
Nogle uger senere fremsætter generaladvokaten under et nyt offentligt retsmøde sit forslag til afgørelse for Domstolen.
Some weeks later, the Advocate General delivers his opinion before the Court of Justice, again in open court.
Generaladvokaten behandler navnlig sagens retlige aspekter i enkeltheder og foreslår i al uafhængighed Domstolen, hvorledes problemet efter hans eller hendes opfattelse skal løses.
He or she analyses in detail the legal aspects of the case and suggests completely independently to the Court of Justice the response which he or she considers should be given to the problem raised.
Hermed er den mundtlige del af sagsbehandlingen afsluttet.
This marks the end of the oral procedure.
Hvis det vurderes, at sagen ikke rejser nye retsspørgsmål, kan Domstolen efter at have hørt generaladvokaten bestemme, at sagen påkendes uden forslag til afgørelse.
If it is decided that the case raises no new question of law, the Court may decide, after hearing the Advocate General, to give judgment without an opinion.
Herefter voterer dommerne på grundlag af et forslag til dom, som den refererende dommer har udarbejdet.
The judges deliberate on the basis of a draft judgment drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur.
Enhver af dommerne kan foreslå ændringer.
Each judge of the formation concerned may propose changes.
Domstolens afgørelser træffes med
Decisions of the Court of Justice are taken by majority and no record is made public of any dissenting opinions.
Sagsbehandlingen for EU-Personaleretten
Procedure before the Civil Service Tribunal
Retten for EU-Personalesager
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol: www.curia.europa.eu Retspraksis: www.curia.europa.eu/da/content/juris/index.htm Pressemeddelelser: www.curia.europa.eu/da/actu/communiques/index.htm Internetportalen til EU: www.europa.eu Fællesskabslovgivning (EUR-Lex): www.eur-lex.europa.eu
Court of Justice of the European Communities : www.curia.europa.eu Case-law: www.curia.europa.eu/en/content/juris/index.htm Press releases: www.curia.europa.eu/en/actu/communiques/index.htm Portal of the institutions of the European Union: www.europa.eu Community legislation (EUR-Lex) : www.eur-lex.europa.eu
(Offentliggørelse af genstanden for stævningen og de deri nedlagte påstande foreligger på alle sprog ca. seks uger efter, at sagen er anlagt ved EU-Personaleretten)* www.curia.europa.eu
Notice of the action in the Official Journal of the European Union (Series C)
Bilæggelse af tvister i mindelighed EU-Personaleretten kan under alle sagens stadier, herunder indgivelse af stævningen, forsøge at fremme en bilæggelse af tvisten i mindelighed.
(Official publication of the subject-matter of the application and the forms of order sought, available approximately six weeks from the day on which the action is brought before the Tribunal)* www.curia.europa.eu
EU-Personaleretten kan på alle sagens trin forsøge
Defence[objection of inadmissibility] the Tribunal may try to reach an amicable settlement
[Replik og duplik] at tilvejebringe en bilæggelse
[Reply and rejoinder]
Retten for EU-Personalesager
European Union Civil Service Tribunal of the dispute between
Den refererende dommer udarbejder den foreløbige rapport af tvisten i mindelighed.
The Tribunal may, however, order suspension of the act or other interim measures.The President of the Tribunal or, in some circumstances, another Judge rules on the application for interim measures by way of reasoned order.
Særlige rettergangsformer Sagsanlæg ved EU-Personaleretten bevirker ingen udsat gennemførelse af den anfægtede retsakt.
Allocation of the case to a Chamber and designation of the Judge-Rapporteur
Tildeling af sagen til en afdeling og udpegelse af refererende dommer
The Judge-Rapporteur prepares the preliminary report the parties.
Afdelingsmøde
Chamber conference
[Bevisforanstaltninger]
[Measures of inquiry]
(Den refererende dommer udarbejder en forberedende retsmøderapport, der indeholder sagens væsentlige aspekter og angiver de punkter, som parterne bør fokusere på i deres mundtlige indlæg)**
(Document drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur containing the essential elements of the case and indicating, where appropriate, the points on which the parties are to focus their arguments)**
Kendelsen har midlertidig karakter og foregriber på ingen måde EU-Personaleret-tens afgørelse i hovedsagen.
The order is provisional in nature and in no way prejudges the decision of the Tribunal in the main proceedings.
I øvrigt kan den appelleres til præsidenten for Retten i Første Instans.
In addition, an appeal against it may be brought before the President of the Court of First Instance.
Dommernes rådslagning og afstemning
Judgment* or order* (in the case of an order, there is never an oral phase)
Dom* eller kendelse* (i tilfælde af en kendelse finder den mundtlige del ikke sted) januar 2007
January 2007 edition
De fakultative etaper i sagsbehandlingen er angivet i skarp parentes.
The optional stages of the procedure are shown in brackets.
De drøftelser, der finder sted under den mundtlige del af sagsbehandlingen, tolkes simultant efter behov til de forskellige officielle sprog i Den Europæiske Union.
The proceedings in the oral phase of the procedure are simultaneously interpreted, as necessary, into various official languages of the European Union.
Dommerne voterer uden tolk på et fælles sprog, nemlig fransk.
The judges deliberate without interpreters in a common language, French.
De andre dokumenter er ikke offentlige.
Other documents are not public.
BAGGRUND
HISTORY
Den skriftlige del En skriftligt udfærdiget stævning fra en advokat stilet til justitskontoret indleder sagsbehandlingen.
The written phase An application, drawn up by a lawyer and sent to the Registry, opens the proceedings.
Justitssekretæren forkynder stævningen for modparten.
The Registrar sends the application to the opposing party.
Sidstnævnte råder over en frist på to måneder til at afgive svarskrift.EU-Personaleretten kan bestemme, at der er behov for replik og duplik.
The Tribunal may decide that a second exchange of pleadings is necessary.
EU-Personaleretten består af syv dommere, der udnævnes af Rådet for en periode på seks år og kan genudnævnes, idet udnævnelse sker efter stillingsopslag og efter høring af et udvalg bestående af syv medlemmer, der er valgt blandt tidligere medlemmer af Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans og jurister med anerkendte faglige kvalifikationer.
The Civil Service Tribunal is composed of seven Judges appointed by the Council for a period of six years which may be renewed, following a call for applications and after taking the opinion of a committee of seven persons chosen from among former members of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance and lawyers of recognised competence.
Med henblik på at opbygge Europa som fællesskab indgik en række stater (i dag i alt 27) indbyrdes en række traktater om oprettelse af De Europæiske Fællesskaber, senere Den Europæiske Union, udstyret med institutioner, som vedtager retsregler på bestemte områder, som umiddelbart bliver en del af de interne retsordner.
For the building of Europe the Member States (now 27 in number) have concluded treaties creating first the European Communities and then a European Union, with institutions adopting laws in specified areas which directly form part of the national legal systems.
EU-Personaleretten har kompetence til som første instans at træffe afgørelse i sager mellem Fællesskaberne og deres ansatte i henhold til artikel 236 EF, hvilket følgelig udgør ca. 150 sager om året for et personale fra fællesskabsinstitutionerne, som ligger i nærheden af 35000 personer.
It has jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance disputes between the Communities and their servants pursuant to Article 236 EC, which as a result represents some 150 cases a year for approximately 35 000 members of the Community institutions’ staff.
Disse sager vedrører ikke kun arbejdsrelate-rede spørgsmål som sådan (løn, karriereforløb, rekruttering, disciplinærstraffe, osv.), men også den sociale sikringsordning (sygdom, alderdom, invaliditet, arbejdsskade, familietillæg osv.).
These disputes concern not only questions to do with working relations in the strict sense (pay, career progress, recruitment, disciplinary measures etc.), but also the social security system (sickness, old age, invalidity, accidents at work, family allowances etc.).
Enhver person, som godtgør at have en interesse i sagens afgørelse ved EU-Personale-retten, samt Fællesskabets institutioner og medlemsstaterne kan intervenere i sagen.
When appointing the Judges, the Council ensures a balanced composition of the Tribunal on as broad a geographical basis as possible from among nationals of the Member States and with respect to the national legal systems represented.
Intervenienten afgiver et indlæg, som enten støtter eller imødegår en af parternes påstande, og dette indlæg kan parterne herefter tage stilling til.
Any person who can prove an interest in the outcome of a case before the Tribunal, as well as the Member States and the Community institutions, may intervene in the proceedings.
Intervenienten kan også fremsætte bemærkninger under den mundtlige forhandling.
The intervener files a statement in intervention, supporting or opposing the claims of one of the parties, to which the latter may then respond.
Den består af tre instanser: Domstolen, Retten i Første Instans og Retten for EU-Personalesager.
It consists of three bodies: the Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance and the Civil Service Tribunal.
EU-Personalerettens dommere udpeger af deres midte deres præsident for et tidsrum af tre år, idet denne kan udpeges på ny.
The Judges of the Tribunal elect their President from among their number for a term of three years which may be renewed.
Derimod kan den ikke afgøre tvister mellem nationale administrationer og deres ansatte.
On the other hand, it may not hear and determine cases between national administrations and their employees.
Det er på grundlag af Nice-traktaten, som trådte i kraft den 1. februar 2003, og som bestemte oprettelsen af retsinstanser inden for særlige områder, at Rådet for Den Europæiske Union i 2004 besluttede at oprette EU-Personaleretten, hvis opgave er at afgøre tvister mellem De Europæiske Fællesskaber og disses ansatte.
It was on the basis of the Treaty of Nice, which entered into force on 1 February 2003 and provided for the creation of judicial panels in certain specific areas, that the Council of the European Union decided in 2004 to create the Civil Service Tribunal, whose task it is to rule on disputes between the European Communities and their staff.
Den mundtlige del I løbet af sagens mundtlige del afholdes der normalt et retsmøde.
The Tribunal sits in Chambers of three Judges.
Herunder kan dommerne stille spørgsmål til parternes repræsentanter og eventuelt til parterne selv.
However, whenever the difficulty or importance of the questions of law raised justifies it, a case may be referred to the full court.
Den refererende dommer udarbejder en foreløbig retsmøderapport, der indeholder sagens væsentlige aspekter og angiver de punkter, som parterne bør fokusere på i deres mundtlige indlæg.
Furthermore, in certain cases to be determined by its Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal may sit in a Chamber of five Judges or as a single Judge.
Dette dokument stilles til offentlighedens rådighed på processproget.
The decisions given by the Tribunal may, within two months, be subject to an appeal, limited to questions of law, to the Court of First Instance.
EU-Personaleretten træder sammen i afdelinger sammensat af tre dommere. Når sagens betydning eller juridiske problemer begrunder det, kan den imidlertid henvise en sag til plenum.
The oral phase During the oral phase a public hearing is usually held.
I tilfælde, som skal fastsættes i dens procesreglement, vil EU-Personaleretten desuden kunne nedsætte en afdeling med fem dommere eller en enkelt dommer.
The Judge-Rapporteur draws up a preliminary report for the hearing, containing the essential points in the case and indicating the points on which the parties are to focus their arguments.
Dommerne udpeger en justitssekretær for et tidsrum af seks år.
The Judges appoint a Registrar for a term of six years.The Tribunal has its own Registry, but makes use of the services of the Court of Justice for its other administrative and linguistic needs.
Dommerne voterer på grundlag af et domsudkast udfærdiget af den refererende dommer.
The Judges deliberate on the basis of draft grounds prepared by the Judge-Rap-porteur.
Dommen afsiges i offentligt retsmøde.
The judgment is delivered at a public hearing.
Sagsbehandlingen ved EU-Personaleretten er reguleret af bestemmelser i Domstolens statut, navnlig i bilag I til statutten.
The procedure before the Tribunal is governed by the provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice, in particular those contained in Annex I thereto.
Indtil EU-Personalerettens procesreglement træder i kraft, anvender den desuden mutatis mutandis procesreglementet for Retten i Første Instans, undtagen hvad angår bestemmelser vedrørende en enkelt dommer.
Moreover, until its own Rules of Procedure enter into force, the Tribunal will apply mutatis mutandis the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, save for the provisions relating to the single Judge.
Sagens omkostninger Sagsbehandlingen ved EU-Personaleretten er gratis.
Costs The procedure before the Tribunal is free of court fees.
Derimod betaler Retten ikke salær til advokater med ret til at møde ved en retsinstans i en medlemsstat, som parterne er pligtige at lade sig repræsentere af. Imidlertid kan der bevilges fri proces til en part, som ikke er i stand til at betale omkostningerne ved sin sag.
On the other hand, the costs of the lawyer entitled to appear before a court in a Member State, by whom the parties must be represented, are not paid by the Tribunal.
Principielt omfatter sagsbehandlingen en skriftlig og en mundtlig del.
A party who is not able to meet the costs of the case may, however, apply for legal aid.
EU-Personaleretten er inden for Fællesskabets dømmende myndighed den ret, som er specialiseret i EU-personalesager, idet denne beføjelse tidligere tilkom Domstolen og siden 1989, hvor Retten i Første Instans blev oprettet, denne ret.
Within the Community judicial institution, it is the Tribunal whose special field is the sphere of disputes involving the European Union civil service, this jurisdiction having previously been exercised by the Court of Justice and then, following its creation in 1989, by the Court of First Instance.
EF-Domstolen i de nye retsbygninger
The new buildings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Bygningernes areal
Surface area
Det gamle Justitspalæ: Ringen: Tårnene: Galleriet: Tårnenes sokler: Parkering: Erasmus: Thomas More: C-bygningen:
Original Palais: Anneau: Towers: Gallery: Base of Towers: Car parks: Erasmus: Thomas More: Annex C:
Forord omstolen skal »værne om lov og ret ved fortolkningen og anvendelsen af traktaterne«, og denne opgave har ikke ændret sig siden 1952.
Preface hile the task entrusted to the Court of Justice, which was to ensure “that in the interpretation and application of [the treaties] the law is observed”, has remained unchanged since 1952, the constant rise in the number of cases brought before it, the expansion of its staff and the creation within it of two other courts have led the oldest of the institutions of the Union to be perceived as an institution
Dette indtryk forstærkes af de mange byggerier, der i løbet af de sidste 30 år er blevet gennemført for at tilfredsstille de stadigt voksende lokalebehov, og som har gjort institutionens fysiske rammer til en permanent byggeplads.
That impression is bolstered by the successive building projects undertaken over the last 30 years to meet the ever-growing need for space which have left the institution at the centre of a permanent building site.
Hensigten med denne bog er at give et indblik i, eller et bedre kendskab til, en del af Domstolens arbejde ved at invitere læseren på et illustreret og kommenteret besøg i de nye retsbygninger.
It is the aim of this book to help the reader to discover or learn more about certain aspects of the work of the Court of Justice by inviting him on a guided tour of its new buildings.
Ved hver etape af besøget i det nye bygningskompleks, som består af det gamle Justitspalæ, Ringen, Tårnene og Galleriet, ledsages Georges Fessys meget smukke fotograer af en tekst om stedets funktion og de pågældende medarbejderes rolle i institutionens daglige arbejde.
At each stage of this visit to the new property complex, consisting of the original courthouse (the “Palais”), the peristyle building (“Anneau”), the Towers and the Gallery, an explanation will be given, illustrated by the excellent photographs of Georges Fessy, of the function of each place and the role of its occupants in the dynamic of the institution.
Undervejs vil læseren kunne genkende de rum, man traditionelt finder i retsbygninger, blot tilpasset et flersproget arbejdsmiljø, og få besvaret spørgsmål vedrørende lokalernes og personalets omfang.
In the course of the visit, the reader will recognise the iconic and traditional features of a Court, adapted here to the demands of multilingualism, and find answers to his questions about the scale of the buildings and the staff working there.
I lang tid havde Domstolen ikke noget justitspalæ.
For a long time, the Court had no purpose-built courthouse.
Indvielsen af det første Justitspalæ i 1973 efter 20 års midlertidige fysiske rammer var en vigtig begivenhed, hvilket understreges af den store tilknytning, Domstolens medlemmer og personale føler til bygningen.
The inauguration of its first Palais in 1973, after 20 years of short-term solutions, was an event whose importance came to be reected in the undeniable attachment of the Members of the Court and its staff to the building itself.
Det var derfor med tilfredshed, at Domstolen i 1994 modtog de luxembourgske myndigheders beslutning om ikke at rive denne symbolske bygning ned, men i stedet renovere den, så den kunne placeres centralt i Dominique Perraults byggeprojekt, hvor den som tidligere justitspalæ fuldt ud kunne helliges den oentlige del af domstolsarbejdet.
Thus, the Court was delighted to learn in 1994 of the decision of the authorities of the Grand Duchy to renovate this iconic building rather than knock it down, which would allow the architect, Dominique Perrault, to place it at the heart of his project in the role of original Palais, devoted entirely to the public aspect of judicial activity.
I dag, hvor Domstolen flytter ind i det nye Justitspalæ, skylder den derfor myndighederne i Luxembourg stor tak, dels fordi de efterkom anmodningen om at tilvejebringe en infrastruktur tilpasset behovene hos domstolsinstitutionen i en Union udvidet til 27 medlemsstater, dels fordi de gav Domstolen mulighed for at indskrive sin egen historie i bygningernes.
This is why, as it takes possession of its new Palais, the Court must thank the authorities of the Grand Duchy on two counts, first for responding to its request for the construction of an infrastructure conducive to the smooth operation of the judicial institution of an enlarged Union with 27 Member States, and second for allowing it to have its own history reected in that of its buildings.
1952-1972 elv om det var blevet drøftet, om Det Europæiske Kul- og
1952-1972 hile there had been some discussion as to whether the European
Stålfællesskabs institutioner, og dermed også Domstolen, skulle placeres i Liège eller Bruxelles, endte byen Luxembourg med at blive valgt foreløbigt i 1952.
Coal and Steel Community institutions and, therefore, the Court were to have their seat in Liège or Brussels, the city of Luxembourg was finally chosen on a provisional basis in 1952.
Fra 1958 blev Det Europæiske Kul- og Stålfællesskabs Domstol desuden til en »fælles« domstol for De Europæiske Fællesskaber med øgede beføjelser og personale til følge.
Moreover, in 1958 the Court of the European Coal and Steel Community became the “single” Court of the European Communities, resulting in an increase in jurisdiction and also sta.
Domstolens hjemsted blev, ligesom de øvrige institutioners hjemsteder, først lagt endeligt fast under Det Europæiske Råds møde i Edinburgh den 12. december 1992.
This provisional arrangement was only conrmed at the Edinburgh European Council of 12 December 1992 when the seats of the institutions, including that of the Court, became denitive.
I august måned 1959 accepterede den luxembourgske regering at stille en bygning, der tilhørte det luxembourgske bispedømme, til rådighed for Domstolen. Bygningen var beliggende på côte d’Eich og var tilstrækkelig stor til at kunne rumme alle Domstolens tjenestegrene.
In August 1959 the Luxembourg Government agreed to make available to the Court a building belonging to the Bishopric of Luxembourg, located on the Côte d’Eich, which was large enough to accommodate all its departments.
Da det i slutningen af 1960’erne blev besluttet, at alle institutionerne skulle placeres på Kirchberg-plateauet, opstod planen om at opføre en bygning til Domstolen, som både funktionelt og symbolsk kunne lede tanken hen på en retsinstans’ sæde.
When it was decided, at the end of the 1960s, that all the Community institutions were to be located on the Kirchberg Plateau, a plan was formed to construct a building for the Court of Justice which, both functionally and symbolically, would convey the image of a court.
Imidlertid var det ikke den manglende endelige fastlæggelse af Domstolens sæde, som i 1952 gjorde det vanskeligt for Domstolen at installere sig, men problemer med at finde lokaler, der var egnede til at huse retsinstansen og dens tjenestegrene.
However, in 1952, it was not the provisional nature of the seat which hindered the installation of the Court but the diculty of finding suitable premises to house the Court and its departments.
På daværende tidspunkt var der således ingen lokaler i Luxembourg, der var tilstrækkeligt store til, at hver af Det Europæiske Kul- og Stålfællesskabs institutioner kunne samle deres tjenestegrene på ét og samme sted.
At that time, the city of Luxembourg boasted no buildings large enough for each institution of the European Coal and Steel Community to accommodate its departments under one roof.
Til sidst blev det besluttet at stille tre bygninger til rådighed for Domstolen: Villa Vauban til de syv dommerkabinetter og to generaladvokater, Hamilius-bygningen til sprogtjenesten – den første af sin art i Det Europæiske Fællesskabs historie – og endelig Hellinkx-bygningen til administrationen og biblioteket.
Three buildings were eventually made available to the Court: the Villa Vauban, for the chambers of the seven Judges and two Advocates General; the Hamilius Building, for the language service – the first in the history of the European Communities – and the Maison Hellinkx, for the administration and the library.
Domstolen flytter ind i en bygning på côte d’Eich (1959-1972).
The premises of the Court of Justice on the Côte d’Eich (1959-1972).
EF-DOMSTOLEN I DE NYE RETSBYGNINGER
THE NEW BUILDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES