natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I en situation, hvor rabatordningen, som Kommissionen har bemærket, forekommer at være mere gunstig for visse luftfartsselskaber, i dette tilfælde rent faktisk de nationale luftfartsselskaber, og hvor de berørte lufthavne for en meget stor del af deres virksomhed har et naturligt monopol, er sådanne almindelige argumenter ikke tilstrækkelige til at fremkomme med en økonomisk begrundelse, der gør det muligt konkret at forklare valget af satserne for de forskellige rabatprocenter.
In a situation where, as the Commission has observed, the system of discounts appears to favour certain airlines, in this case de facto the national airlines, and where the airports concerned are likely to enjoy a natural monopoly for a very large portion of their activities, such general arguments are insufficient to provide economic reasons to explain specifically the rates chosen for the various bands.
Det skal fastslås, at den omhandlede ordning indebærer en forskelsbehandling til fordel for TAP og Portugalia.
The conclusion must be that the system in question discriminates in favour of TAP and Portugalia.
Reduktion med 50% til fordel af indenrigsflyvninger i forhold til udenrigsflyvninger
The 50% reduction for domestic flights as opposed to international flights
For det andet skal det fastslås, at traktatens artikel 86, stk. 2, litra c), forbyder enhver forskelsbehandling foretaget af en virksomhed med en dominerende stilling, der består i at anvende ulige vilkår for ydelser af samme værdi over for handelspartnere, som derved stilles ringere i konkurrencen, uafhængigt af om en sådan forskelsbehandling er knyttet til nationaliteten.
It should also be noted that subparagraph (c) of the second paragraph of Article 86 of the Treaty prohibits any discrimination on the part of an undertaking in a dominant position which consists in the application of dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage, irrespective of whether such discrimination is linked to nationality.
Det er ikke nødvendigt, at en foranstaltning indebærer en forskelsbehandling på grund af nationalitet, for at den omfattes af det i traktatens artikel 86 indeholdte forbud mod misbrug af dominerende stilling, navnlig når den medfører en forskelsbehandling mellem handelspartnere.
It is not necessary for a measure to involve discrimination on grounds of nationality for it to be caught by the prohibition on abuse of a dominant position contained in Article 86 of the
tjenesteydelser af almindelig økonomisk interesse, underkastet traktatens regler, navnlig konkurrencereglerne, i det omfang anvendelsen af disse bestemmelser ikke retligt eller faktisk hindrer opfyldelsen af de særlige opgaver, som er betroet dem, og såfremt den eventuelle undtagelse fra traktatens regler ikke bør påvirke udviklingen af samhandelen i et sådant omfang, at det strider mod Fællesskabets interesse.
be for applying such a system can only be made under Article 90(2) of the Treaty, which provides that undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest are subject to the rules contained in the Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them and provided any derogation from the rules of the Treaty does not affect the development of trade to such an extent as to be contrary to the interest of the Community.
Den Portugisiske Republik har imfdlertid ikke påberåbt sig undtagelsesbestemmelsen i traktatens artikel 90, stk. 2.
However, in this case, the Portuguese Republic has not relied on the exception provided for in Article 90(2) of the Treaty.
hvorefter der sondres mellem, om fartøjerne udfører befordring internt i medlemsstaten eller med andre medlemsstater som bestemmelsessted, og hvorved markedet og den interne befordring i den pågældende medlemsstat herved sikres en særlig fordel, må anses for at udgøre en forbudt begrænsning af retten til fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser på søtransportområdet (dom af 5.10.1994, sag C-381/93, Kommissionen mod Frankrig).
In that connection, the Court of Justice has expressly held that where national legislation, though applicable without discrimination to all vessels whether used by national providers of services or by those from other Member States, operates a distinction according to whether those vessels are engaged in internal transport or in intra-Community transport, thus securing a special advantage for the domestic market and the internal transport services of the Member State in question, that legislation must be deemed to constitute a restriction on the freedom to provide maritime transport services (Case C-381/93 Commission ν France).
Det kan næppe bestrides, at denne slags foranstaltninger ligeledes fører til, at der indrømmes de transportører, der i et større forhold end andre sikrer den interne befordring i forhold til internationale transporter, en fordel, og således medfører en ulige behandling for de samme tjenesteydelse, hvilket berører konkurrencen.
There is no disputing that a measure of this type also confers an advantage on carriers who operate more than others on domestic rather than international routes and so leads to dissimilar treatment being applied to equivalent transactions, thereby affecting free competition.
I denne sag følger forskelsbehandlingen af, at der anvendes differentierede afgifter for det samme antal landinger med fly af samme type.
In this case, the discrimination results from the application of a different tariff system for the same number of landings of aircraft of the same type
Anvendelsen af differentierede afgifter for det samme antal landinger udgør i sig selv en af de former for diskrimination, der er nævnt i traktatens artikel 86, stk. 2, litra c).
The application of different tariffs for the same number of landings constitutes in itself a type of discrimination referred to in subparagraph (c) of the second paragraph of Article 86 of the Treaty.
Ifølge disse bestemmelser er de virksomheder, der har fået overdraget at udføre
Consequently, since all the conditions mentioned in Article 86 are met, any justification there may
Det skal bemærkes, at den anfægtede beslutning ligeledes skal opretholdes af de samme grunde som dem, der er anført ovenfor, uden at det er nødvendigt at undersøge parternes argumentation, i det omfang den omhandler reduktioner af de landingsafgifter for indenrigsflyvninger, der anvendes i lufthavnene i Lissabon, Porto og Faro, og som vedrører andre flyvninger end til og fra Azorerne.
It is not necessary to go further into the line of argument put forward by the parties, it being sufficient to note that, on the same grounds as those set out above, the contested decision should also be upheld in so far as it relates to reductions on landing charges linked to the domestic nature of the flights applying to the airports of Lisbon, Oporto and Faro and concerning flights other than those to and from the Azores
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdelingl den 19. oktober 2000.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 19 October 2000.
Han foreslog, at Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes, og at Den Portugisiske Republik tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.
He proposed that the court should dismiss the application in its entirety and that the applicant be ordered to pay the costs.
Præjudiciel »Fælles toldtarif satellitmodtagere« (Anden Afdeling)
Preliminary ruling (Common Customs Tariff Tariff headings — Satellite television receivers) (Second Chamber)
Ved kendelse af 19. maj 1999 har Finanzgericht Düsseldorf i medfør af artikel 234 EF forelagt to præjudiciellespørgsmålvedrørendefortolkningen af den fælles toldtarifs kombinerede nomenklatur.
By order of 19 May 1999, the Finanzgericht (Finance Court) Düsseldorf referred to the Court two questions for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC on the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff.
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst under en sag mellem Deutsche Nichimen GmbH og Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf vedrørende tariferingen i den kombinerede nomenklatur af en såkaldt satellitmodtager.
Those questions were raised in proceedings between Deutsche Nichimen GmbH and the Hauptzollamt concerning the CN classification of a product described as a satellite television receiver.
Tvisten i hovedsagen og de præjudicielle spørgsmål
Main proceedings and questions referred to the Court
Med sit første spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere oplyst, om den kombinerede nomenklatur skal fortolkes således, at satellitmodtagere, som de i hovedsagen omhandlede, i perioden 1990-1992 skulle tariferes i pos. 8528.
By Question 1, the court of referral is asking essentially whether the CN must be interpreted as meaning that satellite television receivers such as those at issue in the main proceedings came within tariff heading 8528 between 1990 and 1992.
I 1991 og 1992 lod Deutsche Nichimen ad flere gange satellitmodtagere overgå til fri omsætning.
In 1991 and 1992, Deutsche Nichimen on a number of occasions put satellite television receiving devices into free circulation.
Apparaterne blev med henblik herpå tariferet i underposition 8543 80 20 i den kombinerede nomenklatur.
For that purpose, the devices had been classified under CN tariff subheading 8543 80 20.
Toldsatsen ved indførsel af varer, der var omfattet af denne underposition, var 7%.
The rate of customs import duty applicable to that tariff subheading was 7%.
Det bemærkes som anført i denne doms præmis 3, at satellitmodtagere er apparater, der skal konvertere fjernsynssignaler, som udsendes via satellit, modtages af antenner og omdannes af konvertorer, for normalt — efter at være blevet viderebehandlet af en fjernssynsmodtager - at blive vist på en skærm.
In that regard, as stated in paragraph 3 of this judgment, satellite television receivers are devices designed to convert television signals previously broadcast by satellite, received by aerials and processed by converters, so that they can be treated, generally by a television receiver, in order to become visible on screen.
De giver endvidere brugerne mulighed for at kunne vælge mellem flere programmer eller kanaler.
They also allow users to choose between several programmes or channels.
Ved afgørelse af 19. juni 1992 ændrede Hauptzollamt de afgørelser (Feststellungsbescheide), hvorved de varer, der var bragt i fri omsætning, i den relevante periode var blevet tariferet med henblik på oplæggelse på almindeligt toldoplag, og henførte i stedet de pågældende apparater under underposition 8528 10 91. Importtoldsatsen for denne underposition var på 14%.
By decision of 19 June 1992, the Hauptzollamt amended the tax assessments under which the goods put into free circulation during the period in question had been cleared for the public warehouse and reclassified the devices in question under tariff subheading 8528 10 91.
Sagsøgeren påklagede denne afgørelse inden for den fastsatte frist.
Deutsche Nichimen lodged a complaint against that decision within the prescribed period.
Det andet spørgsmål skærm, selv om de ikke nødvendigvis er udstyret med en skærm.
Question 2 correspond to the television receivers referred to in CN tariff heading 8528, which, as is clear from the wording of the subheadings of that heading, receive signals designed to be viewed on a screen even though they do not necessarily have a screen.
I betragtning af besvarelsen af det første spørgsmål er det ufornødent at besvare det andet spørgsmål.
In the light of the answer to Question 1, there is no need to answer Question 2.
»Den fælles toldtarifs kombinerede nomenklatur, som gengivet i bilag I til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2658/87 af 23. juli 1987 om told- ogstatistiknomenklaturen og den fælles toldtarif, som ændret ved bilagene til Kommissionens forordning {EØF) nr. 2886/89 af Ζ august 1989, Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2472/90 af 31. juli 1990 og Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2587/91 af 26. juli 1991, skal fortolkes således, at satellitmodtagere i perioden 1990-1992 henhørte under pos. 8528.*
'The Combined Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff as set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by the Annexes to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2886/89 of 2 August 1989, Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2472/90 of 31 July 1990 and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2587/91 of 2 6 July 1991, must be interpreted as meaning that between 1990 and 1992 satellite television receivers were to be classified under tariff heading 8528.'
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling') den 9. november 2000.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 9 November 2000.
»Satellitmodtagere som beskrevet i forelæggelseskendelsen henhørte i årene 1990-1992 under pos. 8528 i den kombinerede nomenklatur.«
'Satellite receivers of the kind described in the order for reference were to be classified between 1990 and 1992 under heading 8528 of the Combined Nomenclature.'
Sag C-100/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Case C-100/00 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic Approximation of laws
»Traktatbrud — traktatbruddet ikke bestridt - direktiv 73/23/EØF - elektriske vandvarmere — krav, der ikke er fastsat i direktivet« (Anden Afdeling) anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til fællesskabsretten, idet
(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Undisputed failure — Directive 73123/EEC — Electric water heaters — Conditions not prescribed by the directive) (Second Chamber)
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 16. marts 2000 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 16 March 2000, the Commission of the European
Det følger af artikel 5 i direktiv 73/23, at elektriske vandvarmere, der er fremstillet i overensstemmelse med den harmoniserede standard EN 60335-2-21, betragtes som svarende til direktivet.
water heaters manufactured in compliance with harmonised standard EN 60335-2-21 must be regarded as complying with the conditions prescribed by the directive.
I henhold til den pågældende standard skal vandvarmere være udstyret med en termoudløser, som afbryder el-forsyningen, når vandtemperaturen når 130° C.
The abovementioned standard provides in particular that water heaters must contain a device which cuts off the electricity supply when the water temperature reaches 130°C.
Efter italiensk ret er forholdet derimod det, at den termoudløser, som vandvarmere i henhold til standarden skal være udstyret med, er gradueret således, at temperaturen ikke kan overstige 100° C.
Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by subjecting electric storage water heaters to safety conditions not prescribed by Council Directive 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973, and thus not recognising the presumption of compliance with the safety conditions of products manufactured in accordance with standard EN 60335-2-21, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law.
Den italienske regering har ikke bestridt traktatbruddet, men forsikret, at den vil bringe det til ophør.
However, Italian law provides that the thermostatic device with which water heaters must be fitted in accordance with the standard must be set so as not to allow the temperature to exceed 100°C.
Elektriske vandvarmere af beholdertypen er omfattet anvendelsesområdet for direktiv 73/23.
Electric storage water heaters fall within the scope of Directive 73/23.
Direktivets artikel 3 bestemmer, at medlemsstaterne træffer alle nødvendige foranstaltninger for, at der ikke af sikkerhedsmæssige grunde skabes hindringer for den fri omsætning af elektrisk materiel, der opfylder de i direktivets artikel 2 omhandlede sikkerhedskrav.
Article 3 provides that the Member States are to take all appropriate measures to ensure that the free movement of electrical equipment is not impeded for reasons of safety.
»1) Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 73/23/EØF af 19. februar 1973 om tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om elektrisk materiel bestemt til anvendelse inden for visse spændingsgrænser, idet den for elektriske vandvarmere af beholdertypen har opstillet sikkerhedskrav, der ikke er fastsat i direktivet, og således for produkter, der er fremstillet i overensstemmelse med standarden EN 60335-2-21, ikke anerkender formodningen for, at de er i overensstemmelse med sikkerhedskravene.
Declares that, by subjecting electric storage water heaters to safety conditions not prescribed by Council Directive 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits, and thus not recognising the presumption of compliance with the safety conditions of products manufactured in accordance with standard EN 60335-2-21, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 18. januar 2001.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 18 January 2001.
»1) fastslå, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til fællesskabsretten, idet den for elektriske vandvarmere af beholdertypen har opstillet sikkerhedskrav, der ikke er fastsat i Rådets direktiv 73/23/EØF af 19. februar 1973 om tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om elektrisk materiel bestemt til anvendelse inden for visse spændingsgrænser, og således for produkter, der er fremstillet i overensstemmelse med standarden EN 60335-2-21, ikke anerkender formodningen for, at de er i overensstemmelse med sikkerhedskravene, og
Ί) declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law by subjecting storage water heaters to safety conditions not prescribed by Council Directive 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits, and thus not recognising the presumption of compliance with safety conditions of products manufactured in accordance with standard EN 60335-2-21;
2) pålægge Den Italienske Republik at betale sagens omkostninger.«
2) order Italy to pay the costs.'
Sag C-494/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Hellenske Republik Transport
Case C-494/99 Commission of the European Communities ν Hellenic Republic Transport
»Traktatbrud — manglende gennemførelse af direktiv 94/561EF« (Tredje Afdeling) efterkomme direktivet senest den 21. november 1996, og straks underrette Kommissionen herom.
(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations (Third Chamber) than 21 November 1996, and immediately to inform the Commission thereof.
Den 30. november 1998 besvarede de græske myndigheder den begrundede udtalelse, idet de meddelte Kommissionen, at selv om de grundlæggende principper i direktivet allerede var vedtaget og gennemført, var trafik- og kommunikationsministeren i færd med at udarbejde et nyt præsidentdekret med henblik på at gennemføre direktivet fuldt ud.
On 30 November 1998, the Greek authorities responded to the reasoned opinion and informed the Commission that, although the fundamental principles of the Directive had already been adopted and implemented, the Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications was preparing a new Presidential Decree for the purpose of transposing the Directive in full.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 21. december 1999 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Hellenske Republik ved ikke inden for den fastsatte frist at have vedtaget de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for fuldt ud at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 94/56/EF af 21. november 1994, subsidiært ved ikke at have underrettet Kommissionen herom, har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til traktaten og det nævnte direktiv.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 21 December 1999, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to adopt and, in the alternative, to notify to the Commission, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply in full with Council Directive 94/56/EC of 21 November 1994, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and under that directive.
Da direktivet i det foreliggende tilfælde ikke er blevet gennemført inden for den deri fastsatte frist, må der gives Kommissionen medhold i den nedlagte påstand.
In the present case, since the Directive was not transposed within the period prescribed by it, the action brought by the Commission must be considered well founded.
Ifølge direktivets artikel 12, stk. 1, skulle medlemsstaterne sætte de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at
Under Article 12(1) of the Directive, Member States were required to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive not later
Den Hellenske Republik betaler sagens omkostninger.*
Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.*
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling) den 22. februar 2001.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 22 February 2001.
»1) fastslå, at Den Hellenske Republik ved ikke inden for den fastsatte frist at have vedtaget de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for fuldt ud at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 94/56/EF af 21. november 1994 om fastlæggelse af de grundlæggende principper for undersøgelse af flyvehavarier og flyvehændelser inden for civil luftfart, subsidiært ved ikke at have underrettet Kommissionen herom, har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til traktaten og det nævnte direktiv
establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of civil aviation accidents and incidents, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty and the directive;
2) pålægge Den Hellenske Republik at betale sagens omkostninger.«
2) order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.'
Sag C-123/00
Case C-123/00 Christina Bellamy ν English Shop Wholesale SA Free movement of goods
5. april 2001 markedsføring af brød med tilsvarende virkning
5 April 2001 restriction
Præjudiciel »Frie varebevægelser —foranstaltninger reklame for levnedsmidler« (Tredje Afdeling)
Preliminary ruling (Free movement of goods — Measures having an effect equivalent to a quantitative — Marketing of bread — Advertising of foodstuffs) (Third Chamber) sold bread with a salt content of 2.88%;
Ved dom af 28. marts 2000, indgået til Domstolen den 31. marts 2000, har Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles i medfør af artikel 234 EF forelagt tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 28 EF og 30 EF.
By judgment of 28 March 2000, received at the Court on 31 March 1999, the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Court of First Instance, Brussels) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC three questions on the interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under en straffesag mod Christina Bellamy, der er tiltalt for overtrædelse af nationale bestemmelser dels om markedsføring af levnedsmidler, dels om reklame for levnedsmidler.
Those questions were raised in criminal proceedings brought against Mrs Bellamy who is alleged to have contravened national rules relating, first, to the sale of foodstuffs and, second, to the advertising thereof.