natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen anfører i den anfægtede beslutning (punkt 32), at Greene King indgik leveringsaftaler med alle nationale bryggerier og med flere regionale bryggerier, at kun en af disse aftaler, som løber over fem år, indeholder en mindstekøbsforpligtelse, der vedrører mindre end 20% af det kvantum øl, som nævnte bryggeri sælger en gros, og at der findes tre andre bindende aftaler om lagerføringsforpligtelser.
The market share of the establishments which may be regarded as 'locked into' Greene King in the sense of the Commission's observation in point 124 of the Scottish & Newcastle decision is much less than 1%, whether that market share is expressed in terms of the number of establishments or — a more significant criterion — of the volume of beer sold. Consequently, since Greene King's market share is so small, there is clearly no occasion to consider that the existence of the 'locking-in' effect is such as to warrant the conclusion that that brewery contributes significantly to foreclosure of the market. (c) Failure to state reasons
Kommissionen har hermed givet en række oplysninger om de leveringsaftaler, som indeholder en bestemmelse, der indebærer en købsforpligtelse, og har præciseret karakteren og — i hvert fald for så vidt angår den mest omfattende af forpligtelserne — den nøjagtige rækkevidde af disse købsforpligtelser og disse aftalers varighed.
As the Commission rightly stated in point 105 of the contested decision and in points 57 and 58 of the entrepreneur decision, to which the parties referred in the oral procedure, for such an attribution two conditions must be satisfied.
Hermed har Kommissionen givet de oplysninger, som er nødvendige for at kunne vurdere, hvilke betragtninger den har lagt til grund i den foreliggende sag, således at sagsøgerne har kunnet gøre sig bekendt med baggrunden for den anfægtede beslutning og Fællesskabets retsinstanser kunnet udøve sin kontrol i overensstemmelse med de betingelser i domspraksis.
The applicants submit that if, as in the present case, the Commission considers that Article 85 of the Treaty does not apply, it must give reasons for this, so that it is possible to know on what basis its decision may be contested.
Argumentet blev fremført som led i en indsigelse over den vurdering, som på grundlag af betingelserne i Delimitis-dommen, der er nævnt ovenfor i præmis 16, blev foretaget af anvendeligheden af traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, på aftaler om levering af øl, herunder aftaler, som ikke har til formål at begrænse konkurrencen i denne traktatbestemmelses forstand, men som højst kan have til følge at hindre, begrænse eller fordreje konkurrencen (Delimitis-dommen).
In the present case, the Commission, having found that the notice on the regulations was not applicable, made a detailed examination of the specific situation of Greene King, in particular that brewery's market share, the duration of the beer supply agreements concluded with its tied publicans and the effect of the supply agreements concluded with national breweries, and set out on the basis of those factors the grounds on which it concluded that Greene King did not contribute significantly to foreclosure of the market.
Med det nævnte argument gøres det gældende, at der foreligger en prisaftale, dvs. en aftale, som har til formål at begrænse konkurrencen. Argumentet vedrører derfor en overtrædelse i fællesskabsretten, som ikke blot er betydeligt grovere end den, klagen vedrører, men også helt forskellig herfra.
First, the beer supply agreements concluded between the wholesaling brewery, in this case Greene King, and the supplying breweries, namely the national breweries — the 'upstream' agreements — may be regarded as forming part of the supplying breweries' networks of agreements if they contain terms which may be analysed as a purchasing obligation (commitments to purchase minimum quantities, stocking obligations or non competition obligations).
Følgelig falder argumentet, der efter selve sin karakter er forskellig fra de øvrige, uden for de rammer, der er afstukket i klagen.
It follows that a supply contract which does not contain a purchasing obligation, in whatever form, does not form part of the network of agreements of a supplying brewery, even if it relates to a substantial proportion of the beer sold by the establishments tied to the wholesaling brewery.
Dette argument kan derfor højst anses for en ny klage, som er forskellig fra den, der ligger til grund for den administrative procedure, hvorunder det blev gjort gældende. Forudsat argumentet i øvrigt kan betegnes som en klage, kan de bemærkninger, Kommissionen anførte i
Next, for not only the 'upstream' agreements but also the agreements concluded between the wholesaling brewery and the establishments tied to it — the 'downstream' agreements — to be attributed to the supplying breweries' networks of agreements, it is also necessary for the agreements between the supplying breweries and the wholesaling brewery to be so restrictive that access to the wholesaling brewery's network of
Kommissionen var i den forbindelse ikke forpligtet til at angive det faktiske kvantum øl, der blev indkøbt hos bryggerierne/leverandørerne.
Consequently, in the present case, the Commission adequately stated its reasons for reaching that conclusion, and so made it entirely possible for the applicants and the Court to ascertain its reasoning.
Det afgørende spørgsmål er altså, i hvilket omfang Greene King var forpligtet til at foretage indkøb hos sine bryggerier/leverandører, ikke, i hvilket omfang det faktisk foretog indkøbene hos dem.
The applicants were thus in a position to assess whether the Commission's decision should be contested, and moreover did so.
Grunden hertil er, at andre bryggeriers adgang til Greene King's aftalenet »på
The Court for its part has been able to review the lawfulness of the contested decision in the light of that reasoning.
meddelelsen i henhold til artikel 6 i forordning nr. 99/63 og forud for den endelige beslutning (Rettens dom af 10.6.1990, sag T-64/89, Automec mod Kommissionen).
'downstream' agreements is no longer possible, or at least very difficult, for other breweries in the United Kingdom or elsewhere.
den anfægtede beslutning — og hvorefter sagsøgerne ikke på daværende tidspunkt havde fremlagt dokumentation til godtgørelse af, at der forelå en sådan aftale — på grund af deres foreløbige karakter højst anses for en første reaktion fra Kommissionen, der henhører under den første af de tre faser for afviklingen af proceduren i henhold til artikel 3, stk. 2, i forordning nr. 17 og artikel 6 i forordning nr. 99/63, nemlig den fase, som følger efter indgivelsen af klagen, og som går forud for
The Commission stated in the contested decision that Greene King had concluded supply agreements with all the national breweries and with several regional breweries, that only one of those agreements, with a duration of five years, contained an obligation to purchase minimum quantities relating to less than 20% of the beer sold wholesale by Greene King, and that there were three other agreements with stocking obligations.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
They are thus in a position to have access to all the establishments in that network without it being necessary to conclude separate agreements with each outlet.
»1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
It therefore adequately provided the necessary information for assessing its reasoning in the present case, so enabling the applicants to ascertain the reasons for the contested decision and the court to exercise its power of review, in accordance with the requirements of the case-law.
Sagsøgerne betaler sagens omkostninger.«
One of the contracts, with a duration of five years, contains a minimum purchasing obligation for less than 20% of the volume of beer sold wholesale by Greene King.
Præjudiciel »Procesreglementets artikel 104, stk. 3 — socialpolitik — beskyttelse af arbejdstagernes sikkerhed og sundhed — direktiv 89/391/EØF og 93)'104/EF — anvendelsesområde -personale i primære behandlingsenheder — gennemsnitlig arbejdstid — medregning af tid med vagttjeneste« (Sjette Afdeling) nr. 26/00, s. 4).
The Commission was therefore right to conclude in the contested decision that Greene King's network of 'downstream' agreements could not be attributed to the supplying breweries which had concluded beer supply agreements with Greene King.
(Svarer til sag C-308/98, jf. Domstolens dom af 3. oktober 2000, »Arbejdet ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol og Ret i Første Instans«
The applicants' allegation of the existence of a horizontal agreement on prices between national and regional breweries — including Greene King — and pub companies, which was made for the first time during the administrative procedure, was not relevant in the context of the b) Failure to state reasons
*1) Et arbejde som det, der udføres af læger og sygeplejersker, der arbejder for Servicio Galego de Saúde i enhederne med rådighedstjeneste, i de primære behandlingsenheder og i andre enheder, hvori der ydes akut ambulant behandling inden for den autonome region Galiciens område, er omfattet af anvendelsesområdet for Rådets direktiv 93/104/EF af 23. november 1993 om visse aspekter i forbindelse med tilrettelæggelse af arbejdstiden.
Even if it may be classified as a complaint, the observations of the Commission in the contested decision that the applicants had not, as matters stood, provided evidence to show the existence of an agreement may at most, in view of their provisional nature, be regarded as an initial reaction by the Commission, forming part of the first of the three stages of the course of the procedure governed by Article 3(2) of Regulation No 17 and Article 6 of Regulation No 99/63, namely the stage which follows the submission of the complaint and precedes the stages of the notification prescribed in Article 6 of Regulation No 99/63 and of the final decision (judgment in Case T-64/89 Automec ν Commission). Since these preliminary observations form part of the first stage of the procedure, they cannot be classified as acts open to challenge (Automec).
Sag C-367/98 Kommissionen Fællesskaber Republik
(This case is similar to Case C-303/98 Simap [2000] ECR 1-7963, or Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Court of Justice No 26/00, p.
Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 3. juli 2001.
An activity such as that of the medical and nursing staff providing services for Servido Galego de Saúde in the on-call service, in primary care teams and in other services which treat outside emergencies in the area of the Autonomous Community of Galicia fall within the scope of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — artikel 43 og 56 EF — opretholdelse af en national lovgivning om en særlig aktie i Société Nationale de Transport par canalisation (SNTC) og i Distrigaz SA, hvortil der er knyttet meget vidtgående rettigheder med henblik på at beskytte nationale interesser på energiområdet
2) An activity such as that of the medical and nursing staff providing services for Servicio Galego de Saúde in the on-call service, in primary care teams and in other services which treat outside emergencies in the area of the Autonomous Community of Galicia does not come within the scope of the exceptions or exclusions laid down in Article 2 of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 lune 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 3. juli 2001.
However, such an activity may come under the derogations provided for in Article 17 of Directive 93/104, provided that the conditions set out in that provision are fulfilled.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — artikel 43-48 EF og artikel 56 EF — rettigheder, der er knyttet til den franske stats særlige aktie i Société Nationale Elf-Aquitaine (dekret 93-1298)
Time spent on call, when theirphysical presence is required, by the medical and nursing staff providing services for Servicio Galego de Saúde in the on-call service, in primary care teams and in other services which treat outside emergencies in the area of the Autonomous Community of Galicia must be regarded in its entirety as working time, and where appropriate as overtime, within the meaning of Directive 93/104.'
Generaladvokat L.A Geelhoed fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 5. juli 2001.
In support of their action, they claimed essentially that in adopting that regulation the Commission of the European Communities infringed both Article 83(1) EC, by not complying with the essential procedural requirements in respect of the consultation procedures provided for in that article, and Article 81(1) EC, by substantively amending the Treaty rules on competition.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The order appealed against
Sag C-370/00 Kommissionen for Fællesskaber / Irland
It also held that the CNPA and the DLR were not asserting any procedural right or invoking any interest of their own, as distinct from that of their members, allegedly affected by Regulation No 2790/1999.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Rådets direktiv 96/49/EF af 23. juli 1996 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om jernbanebefordring af farligt gods og af Kommissionens direktiv 96/87/EF af 13. december 1996 om tilpasning til den tekniske udvikling af Rådets direktiv 96/49/EF om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om jernbanebefordring af farligt gods
Regulation No 2790/1999 states that under certain conditions Article 81(1) EC does not apply to agreements or concerted practices entered into between two or more undertakings each of which operates, for the purposes of the agreement, at a different level of the production or distribution chain, and relating to the conditions under which the parties may purchase, sell or resell certain goods or services.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 5. juli 2001.
In their appeal, the appellants claim that the Court should annul the contested order.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The appellants put forward three pleas in support of their appeal.
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
It follows that there is nothing to prevent the Court of First Instance from closing a case by ruling it to be inadmissible before an application to intervene is allowed, even where the time-limit for making such an application has not yet expired.
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
It follows from all those considerations that the appeal must be dismissed as clearly unfounded and clearly inadmissible under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure, so that it is not necessary to rule on the application to intervene made by Federauto
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
He proposed that the Court: in Case C-368/98,
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 6.7.2001 Katalognr.: QD-AC-Ol-019-DA-C
Advocate General P. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 3 July 2001.
Sag C-315/99 Ρ Ismeri Europa Sri / Revisionsretten for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Case C-315/99 Ρ
Sag T­131/00 Robert Charles Schochaert / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Tj enestemandsvedtægten
Case C-262/99 Paraskevas Louloudakis v Elliniko Dimosio Taxation
Sag C­497/99 Ρ Irish Sugar pic / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Konkurrence
Case C-86/00 HSB-Wohnbau GmbH Freedom of movement for persons
Forenede sager T­12/99 og T­63/99 . . UK Coal pic / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber KS
Joined Cases T-12/99 and Τ-63/99 UK Coal pic ν Commission of the European Communities CS
Sag C­35/99 Straffesag mod Manuele Arduino
Case C-35/99 70 Criminal proceedings against Manuele Arduino
Sag T­120/99 Christina Kik / Kontoret for Harmonisering i det Indre Marked (Varemærker og Design) (KHIM) Immaterialrettigheder
Case T-120/99 48 Christina Kik ν Office for the Harmonization of the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM) Intellectual property
Sag C­353/99 Ρ Rådet for Den Europæiske Union / Heidi Hautala
Case C-353/99 Ρ Council of the European Union ν Heidi Hautala
Sag C­427/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland
Case C-427/00 72 Commission of the European Communities ν United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Forenede sager T­198/95, T­171/96, T­230/97, T­174/98 og T­225/99 Comafrica SpA, Dole Fresh Fruit Europe Ltd & Co. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug 66
Joined Cases T-198/95, T-171/96, T-230/97, T174/98 and T-225/99 52 Comafrica SpA, Dole Fresh Fruit Europe Ltd & Co. ν Commission of the European Communities Agriculture 72
Sag T­3/99 Banatrading GmbH / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Landbrug
Case C-24/99 74 Commission of the European Communities ν Federal Republic of Germany
Sag T­204/99 Olii Mattila / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Case T-131/00 Robert Charles Schochaert ν Council of the European Union Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag C­373/99 67 Den Hellenske Republik / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-313/99 76 Mulligan and Others v Minister of agriculture and Food Ireland and Attorney General
Coop, ari / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Coop, ari ν Commission of the European Communities
Sag C-315/99 Ρ Ismeri Europa Sri / Revisionsretten for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Case C-315/99 Ρ Ismeri Europa Sri ν Court of Auditors of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
»Appel — MED-programmer ­ Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 1/96 kontradiktionsprincippet — omtale af tredjemand med navns nævnelse — nødvendighed proportionalitet« (Domstolens plenum) tildelt kontrakterne om opfølgning af programmer, som de havde medvirket til at udarbejde i ARTM's bestyrelse.
(Appeal — MED programmes — Special Report No 1/96 of the Court of Auditors — Principle of the right to a hearing — Naming of third parties — Necessity and proportionality) (Full Court) programmes which they had helped to draw up within the ARTM's board of directors.
Ismeri er en af de to kontorer for faglig bistand, som er nævnt i beretning nr. 1/96.
Ismeri is one of the two BATs named in that connection in Report No 1/96.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 24. august 1999 har Ismeri Europa Sri indgivet appel til prøvelse af dom afsagt den 15. juni 1999 af Retten i Første Instans i sag T­277/97, Ismeri Europa mod Revisionsretten, hvorved Retten frifandt Revisionsretten for Ismeri's påstand om tilkendelse af erstatning for det tab, selskabet hævdede at have lidt på grund af den kritik af det, som Revisionsretten fremførte i sin særberetning nr. 1/96 om MED­programmerne, der blev vedtaget den 30. maj 1996.
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 24 August 1999, Ismeri Europa Sri brought an appeal against the judgment of 15 June 1999 of the Court of First Instance in Case T-277/97 Ismeri Europa ν Court of Auditors) in which the Court of First Instance dismissed its application for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of criticisms made against it by the Court of Auditors in Special Report No 1/% on the MED programmes, adopted on 30 May 1996.
Den 31. januar 1997 tilsendte Ismeri Revisionsretten en skrivelse, hvori selskabet gjorde den bekendt med sine synspunkter vedrørende beretning nr. 1/96 og anmodede den om at berigtige de punkter i beretningen, som vedrørte selskabet.
On 31 January 1997 Ismeri wrote to the Court of Auditors with its observations on Report No 1/96 and to request it for rectification of the points contained therein concerning it.
Ved skrivelse af 7. marts 1997 svarede Revisionsretten, at den opretholdt de af den foretagne konstateringer og nægtede at udsende de ønskede berigtigelser.
By letter of 7 March 1997 the Court of Auditors replied that it stood by its initial findings and refused to publish the rectification requested.
Den 20. oktober 1997 anlagde Ismeri sag ved Retten med påstand om erstatning af det tab, Fællesskabet havde lidt på grund af offentliggørelsen af rapport nr. 1/96.
On 20 October 1997 Ismeri brought an action for damages in respect of the injury to its reputation, and the loss resulting from termination of contracts and for loss of profit incurred as a result of publication of Report No 1/96.
I denne beretning, som blev offentliggjort i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende den 19. august 1996, kritiserede Revisionsretten på en række punkter forvaltningen af MED­programmerne, idet den navnlig bl.a. fremhævede, at den generelle forvaltning af ordningen var behæftet med interessesammenblanding.
In Report No 1/96, which was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities of 19 August 19%, the Court of Auditors formulated various criticisms concerning the management of the MED programmes, specifically highlighting conflicts of interest in the overall system of management.
Den fastslog navnlig, at to af de fire medlemmer af bestyrelsen for Agence pour les réseaux transméditerranéens (agenturet for netværk i middelhavsområdet; herefter »ARTM«), som er en belgisk organisation, der ikke arbejder med gevinst for øje, og som Kommissionen specielt har oprettet til at varetage den administrative og økonomiske forvaltning af MED­programmerne, var ledere af de kontorer for faglig bistand, der havde fået
In particular, it found that, of the four administrators of the Agence pour les réseaux transméditerranéens (Agency for Transmediterranean Networks, hereinafter 'ARTM'), a non-profit-making organisation established by the Commission under Belgian law in order to conduct the administrative and financial management of the MED programmes, two were directors of Technical Assistance Offices (BATs) which had been awarded contracts for the monitoring of the
anmodede endvidere Retten om at høre en række vidner som led i bevisoptagelsen.
although the Court of First Instance stated that it had doubts concerning the credence to be attached to certain documents, it relied on the version of the facts contained in Report No 1/96.
Efter at have forkastet flere af de anbringender om afvisning af sagen, som blev fremført af Revisionsretten, tog Retten stilling til Ismeri's anbringender vedrørende realiteten i to omgange.
After dismissing various pleas of inadmissibility raised by the Court of Auditors, the Court of First Instance dealt in two stages with the applicant's substantive pleas.
Ismeri har gjort gældende, at selskabets anmodning om afhøring af vidner udgjorde et selvstændigt punkt i dets påstande, som Retten burde have taget stilling til i den anfægtede dom.
First, in regard to infringement of the principle of a right to a hearing, the Court of First Instance observed that for the Community to incur liability it was not sufficient merely that an illegality had been committed; proof also had to be adduced of a causal link between such illegal conduct and the damage complained of.
Rettens stiltiende afvisning heraf godtgør efter Ismeri's opfattelse, at der er foretaget en utilstrækkelig bevisførelse i sagen, da Retten nøjedes med at henvise til den version af de faktiske omstændigheder, der var indeholdt i beretning nr. 1/96, selv om den erklærede at være i tvivl om troværdigheden af visse dokumenter.
In that connection the Court of First Instance is the sole judge of any need for the information available to it concerning the cases before it to be supplemented.