natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ved kendelse af 27. september 1993 henviste Domstolen i overensstemmelse med artikel 3 i Rådets afgørelse 88/591/EKSF, EØF, Euratom af 24. oktober 1988 om oprettelse af De Europæiske Fællesskabers Ret i Første Instans, som ændret ved Rådets afgørelse 93/350/Euratom, EKSF, EØF af 8. juni 1993, sagen til Retten.
Certain of those conditions, in particular those dealing with the time when the non-marketing undertaking expired, were declared invalid by the Court of Justice in judgments of 11 December 1990 in Case C-189/89 Spagl ν Hauptzollamt Rosenheim [1990] and Case C-217/89 Pastätter ν Hauptzollamt Bad Reichenhall [1990].
Edmond Ropars afgik ved døden den 29. november 1998. Hans hustru og syv af hans børn har som arvinger på behørig vis tilkendegivet, at de vil videreføre sagen.
His wife, who had also signed the undertaking, took his place in running the farm until 11 June 1986.
Fællesskabet tilpligtes at betale sagsøgerne en erstatning på 461 949,60 FRF, med rente 8% p.a. fra sagens anlæg, og et beløb på 180 000 FRF svarende til værdiforringelsen af den solgte landbrugsjord.
Following those judgments, the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 1639/91 of 13 June 1991 amending Regulation No 857/84 which, by removing the conditions which had been declared invalid, made it possible for the producers concerned to be allocated a special reference quantity.
Dette erstatningsansvar skyldes krænkelsen af den berettigede forventning, som producenter, tilskyndet af en fællesskabsretsakt til at indstille markedsføringen af mælk i en begrænset periode af hensyn til almenvellet og mod betaling af en præmie, kunne have med hensyn til deres ikkemarkedsføringsforpligtelses begrænsede virkninger.
On 17 November 1987 Mr Ropars applied to the prefect of the département of Finistère to be allocated a reference quantity.
Princippet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning er dog ikke til hinder for, at der — af årsager, som ikke har noget at gøre med ikke-markedsføringsforpligtelsen — under en ordning som tillægsafgiftsordningen pålægges en producent begrænsninger som følge af, at han ikke har markedsført mælk i en bestemt periode, der ligger forud for ikrafttrædelsen af den nævnte ordning.
The application was refused by a decision of the prefect of 27 November 1987, on the ground that he had not produced milk in 1983.
Fællesskabet tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger og betale sagsøgerne 40 000 FRF til dækning af advokatudgifter.
By judgment of 19 May 1992 in Joined Cases Mulder and Others ν Council and Commission [1992] ('Mulder IP), the Court of Justice held the Community liable for the damage caused to certain milk producers who had been prevented from marketing milk owing to the application of Regulation No 857/84 because they had given undertakings under Regulation No 1078/77.
Sagen udsættes, indtil Tribunal administratif de Rennes, har truffet afgørelse i den for denne ret verserende sag om Onilait's afgørelse af 11. september 1997.
On application by Mr Ropars, the refusal was annulled on 2 March 1989 by a judgment of the Tribunal Administratif de Rennes (Administrative Court, Rennes), France, on the ground that the Community regulation on which it was based had been declared invalid by the Court of Justice.
Begæringen om, at sagen udsættes
However, that undertaking was subject to the condition that entitlement to compensation was
Da afgørelsen fra Tribunal administratif de Rennes kun kan have betydning for størrelsen af sagsøgernes eventuelle erstatning, og ikke for
On 9 January 1990, on the basis of that judgment, Mr Ropars again applied for a reference quantity to the French Minister of Agriculture, and for compensation for his loss.
Det bemærkes, at selv om det antages, at Edmond Ropars på intet tidspunkt har overdraget sin bedrift efter sin pensionering den 31. december 1983, og han fortsatte sin
The actions brought against the refusal were dismissed, first by the Tribunal Administratif de Rennes on 28 April 1993 on the ground that Mr
landbrugsvirksomhed efter denne dato, påhviler det alligevel sagsøgerne at føre bevis for, at han havde til hensigt at producere mælk ved udløbet af omstillingsperioden.
the loss in value of the agricultural land which was sold; order the Community to pay all the costs of the proceedings and FRF 40 000 as reimbursement for recoverable expenses;
med føje påstå, at Edmond Ropars havde en berettiget forventning om at kunne genoptage sin mælkeproduktion, som blev skuffet ved den pågældende fællesskabslovgivning.
Ropars was retired and therefore had no claim to a quota, and then by the French Conseil d'État on 30 April 1997 on the ground that neither the prefect nor the Minister of Agriculture was competent to grant a quota.
Fællesskabet ifalder ikke ansvar over for Edmond Ropars for anvendelsen af forordning nr. 857/84. Det er herefter ufornødent at undersøge, om de øvrige ansvarsbetingelser er opfyldt.
The only national authority which had jurisdiction under the French legislation was the Office National Interprofessionel du Lait et de Produits Laitiers ('Onilait').
Det er ligeledes ufornødent at tage stilling til spørgsmålet om forældelse.
stay the proceedings pending the judgment of the Tribunal Administratif de Rennes on the action brought against Onilait's decision of 11 September 1997.
Det er ubestridt, at han først ansøgte om en referencemængde den 17. november 1987.
Mr Ropers ceased farming on 31 December 1991.
Under disse omstændigheder kan sagsøgerne ikke
The application for a stay of proceedings
»1) Begæringen om, at sagen udsættes, tages ikke tilfølge.
Following the judgment of the Conseil d'État, Mr Ropars applied on 10 May 1997 to Onilait for a quota.
Rådet for Den Europæiske Union frifindes.
Mr Ropars brought an action challenging that decision in the Tribunal Administratif de Rennes, which has not yet given judgment.
Sagsøgerne betaler sagens omkostninger.«
As regards the position of milk producers who have signed a non-marketing undertaking, the Community is liable to every producer who has suffered a reparable loss owing to the fact that he was prevented from delivering milk by Regulation No 857/84 (Mulder II).
Sag T-537/93 Hervé Tromeur / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
By order of 27 September 1993, the Court of Justice remitted the case to the Court of First Instance, in accordance with Article 3 of Council Decision 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 24 October 1988 establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities as amended by Council Decision 93/350/Euratom, ECSC, EEC of 8 June 1993.
»Erstatningssøgsmål — ansvar uden for kontraktforhold — mælk — tillægsafgift — referencemængde — producent, der har påtaget sig en omstillingsforpligtelse — manglende genoptagelse af produktionen ved forpligtelsens ophør« (Første Afdeling)
That liability is based on breach of the legitimate expectation which producers who were encouraged by a Community measure to suspend marketing of milk for a limited period in the general interest and against payment of a premium were entitled to have in the limited scope of their non-marketing undertakings.
at kunne genoptage mælkeproduktionen ved ophøret af hans omstillingsperiode.
marketed milk during a given period prior to the entry into force of that scheme, for reasons which have nothing to do with his non-marketing undertaking.
Sagsøgeren, der er landmand i Fuzunec (Frankrig), indgik en forpligtelse til at omstille sin malkekvægsbesætning til kødproduktion i henhold til forordning nr. 1078/77. Forpligtelsen ophørte den 15. november 1983, og han har efter denne dato ikke genoptaget sin mælkeproduktion.
According to settled case-law, it is for the party seeking to establish the Community's liability to adduce conclusive proof as to the existence or extent of the damage he alleges and to establish the causal link between that damage and the conduct complained of on the part of the Community institutions.
I skrivelse af 6. oktober 1988 til præfekten i Finistère gav sagsøgeren udtryk for sin utilfredshed med den situation, han befandt sig i efter indførelsen af mælkekvoterne. Han præciserede endvidere, at han på grund af de urimelige finansielle omkostninger ikke kunne producere mælk uden kvote.
Even if it is accepted that Mr Ropars did not in fact transfer his holding at any time following his retirement on 31 December 1983 and continued to farm after that date, the applicants must still show that it was his intention to produce milk after his conversion period ended.
Først den 20. februar 1992, dvs. efter ikrafttrædelsen af forordning nr. 1639/91, har han ansøgt om tildeling af en referencemængde.
It appears from the documents in the case that Mr Ropars did not resume milk production when his undertaking expired on 1 February 1984, despite the fact that Regulation No 857/84 did not enter into force until 1 April 1984.
Den 20. februar 1992 ansøgte Hervé Tromeur om tildeling af en referencemængde i henhold til forordning nr. 1639/91.
It is common ground, next, that he did not apply for a reference quantity until 17 November 1987.
De nationale myndigheder afslog ansøgningen ved afgørelse af 30. september 1992 under henvisning til, at den var indgivet for sent. Sagsøgeren har aldrig fået tildelt en referencemængde af de nationale myndigheder.
Finally, it has not been shown that he took steps which could demonstrate his intention to resume milk production after the conversion period.
Heraf følger, at sagsøgeren ikke med føje kan påstå, at han har haft en berettiget forventning om at kunne genoptage sin mælkeproduktion, som blev skuffet ved den pågældende fællesskabslovgivning.
In those circumstances, the applicants cannot claim that Mr Ropars had a legitimate expectation of being able to resume milk production which could have been frustrated by the Community legislation at issue.
Efter ikrafttrædelsen af forordning nr. 2187/93 af 22. juli 1993 anmodede sagsøgeren om at få tilsendt et tilbud om erstatning som omhandlet i denne forordning.
The Community cannot be held liable to Mr Ropars as a result of the application of Regulation No 857/84, and it is unnecessary to ascertain whether the other conditions for such liability are satisfied.
Ved stævning indleveret den 12. oktober 1993 har sagsøgeren anlagt nærværende sag.
It is also unnecessary to consider whether the application was out of time.
Sagsøgerne har nedlagt følgende påstande:
The Court:
Det ville have skuffet sagsøgerens berettigede håb om
Dismisses the application;
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Orders the applicants to pay the costs.'
»1) Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
Case T-537/93 Hervé Tromeur ν Council of the European Union Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
Sag C-319/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
By application lodged on 12 October 1993, the applicant brought the present action.
Traktatbrud — manglende gennemførebe inden for den fastsattefrist af Europa-Parlamentet og Rådets direktiv 95I47IEF af 24. oktober 1995 om standarder for transmission af tv-signaler
The applicant, a farmer in Fuzunec, France, gave an undertaking to convert his dairy herd to meat production in the context of Regulation No 1078/77. The undertaking expired on 15 November 1983 and the applicant did not resume milk production after that date.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling) den 20.
In a letter of 6 October 1988 to the prefect of the département of Finistère, the applicant manifested his dissatisfaction with the situation he found himself in after the introduction of milk quotas.
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling') den 22. juni 2000.
That regulation, it is claimed, frustrated his legitimate expectation to be able to resume milk production at the end of his conversion period.
Vi erindrer om, at nr. 21/99 og 22/99 af denne publikation indeholder en meddelelse om den nye fremgangsmåde for angivelse af traktatbestemmelser i Domstolens og Rettens tekster.
After the entry into force of Regulation No 2187/93, the applicant applied to the Commission for an offer of compensation. That request was turned down on the ground that, contrary to the
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Failure by a State to comply with its obligations — Failure to transpose, with the time-limit prescribed, Directive 95147IEC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of standards for the transmission of television signals.
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Advocate General A. Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 20 June 2000.
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
Preliminary ruling—Pretura Circondariale (District Magistrates' Court), Treviso — Validity of certain regulations in the wine sector — 1993/1994 wine year
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 22.6.2000 Katalognr.: QD-AC-OO-019-DA-C
Advocate General G. Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 22 June 2000.
Ugen 26. - 30. juni 2000
26 to 30 June 2000
Sag C-404/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Portugisiske Republik Statsstøtte
Case C-404/97 Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic State aid
Forenede sager T-172/98, T-175/98, T-176/98 og T-177/98 8 Salamander AG m.fl. / Europa-Parlamentet Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
Joined Cases T-172/98, T-175/98, T-176/98 and T-177/98 8 Salamander AG and Others v European Parliament Council of the European Union Environment and consumers
Sag T-72/99 Karl L. Meyer / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regionalpolitik
Case T-72/99 10 Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the European Communities Regional policy
Ny angivelse af traktatbestemmelse . . .
Case C-217/99 Commission of the European Communities ν Kingdom of Belgium
Sag C-404/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Portugisiske Republik Statsstøtte
Case C-404/97 Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic State aid
— tilbagesøgning — absolut umuligt
State aid incompatible with the common market — Recovery
Ved beslutning nr. 430/96-XIII af 13. september 1996 bevilgede finansministeren denne garanti som led i et lån, EPAC optog hos en gruppe af private banker med det formål at omlægge EPAC's kortfristede banklån.
By Decision No 430/96-XIII of 30 September 1996, the Finance Ministry granted that guarantee in connection with a loan obtained by EPAC from a group of private banks with the purpose of restructuring EPAC's short-term bank debt into medium-term bank debt.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 2. december 1997 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Portugisiske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EF-traktaten og Kommissionens beslutning 97/762/EF af 9. juli 1997 (herefter »den anfægtede beslutning«), da den ikke inden for de fastsatte frister har ophævet og tilbagesøgt den støtte, som EPAC — Empresa Para a Agroalimentação e Cereais SA) uretmæssigt har modtaget.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 2 December 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to cancel and recover, within the prescribed period, the aid from which EPAC — Empresa para a Agroalimentação e Cereais, SA unduly benefited, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Commission Decision 97/762/EC of 9 July 1997 (hereinafter 'the decision at issue').
Efter at have fået meddelelse om denne operation ved en klage besluttede Kommissionen at indlede proceduren i henhold til traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2.
Having become aware of that operation as a result of a complaint, the Commission decided to initiate the procedure under Article 93(2) of the Treaty.
Under hensyn til den heraf følgende påvirkning af samhandelen og fordrejning af konkurrencevilkårene fandt Kommissionen, at støtten var omfattet af forbuddet i EF-traktatens artikel 92, stk. 1 (efter ændring nu artikel 87, stk. 1, EF), og ikke kunne fritages efter nogen af undtagelsesbestemmelserne i artikel 92, stk. 2 og 3.
The Commission found that the aid fell within the scope of Article 92(1) of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 87(1) EC) without being able to benefit from any of the derogations provided for in Article 92(2) and (3).
Som det fremgår af betragtningerne til den anfægtede beslutning, var afsætningen af korn i Den Portugisiske Republik inden dennes tiltrædelse af De Europæiske Fællesskaber undergivet et monopol, som blev forvaltet af EPAC.
According to the preamble to the decision at issue, before the accession of Portugal to the European Community, the marketing of cereals in Portugal was covered by EPAC as a public monopoly.
Efter tiltrædelsen blev monopolet gradvist afviklet. Kornmarkedet blev liberaliseret fra 1991, og EPAC blev omdannet til et aktieselskab med offentlig kapital.
After accession, this public monopoly was gradually dismantled.
EPAC er dog fortsat forpligtet til at sikre komforsyningen i Portugal.
However, EPAC remained responsible for ensuring cereal supplies to the country.
Ved en interministeriel afgørelse af 26. juli 1996 blev der vedtaget en plan for økonomisk rentabilisering og finansiel sanering af EPAC, inden for hvis rammer EPAC fik godkendelse til
On 7 July 1997, two actions for annulment were brought against that decision, one by the Portuguese Government (C246/97) and another by EPAC (T-204/97).
Den 30. april 1997 vedtog Kommissionen beslutning 97/433/EF, der pålagde den portugisiske regering at suspendere den støtte i form af en statsgaranti, der var ydet til fordel for virksomheden EPAC.
By interministerial decision of 26 July 1996, a plan for making EPAC viable and financially sound was adopted, as part of which EPAC was authorised to negotiate the terms of a loan up to a total of PTE 50 billion, PTE 30 billion of which would be covered by a State guarantee.
Den 7. juli 1997 indgav Den Portugisiske Republik og EPAC to annullationssøgsmål vedrørende denne beslutning (henholdsvis sag C-246/97 og T-204/97).
Following the replies from the Portuguese authorities, the Commission decided to close the procedure provided for by Article 93(2) of the Treaty and adopted the decision at issue in which it found that the State guarantee granted to
Efter at have modtaget svarene fra de portugisiske myndigheder besluttede Kommissionen at afslutte proceduren i henhold til traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, og at vedtage den anfægtede beslutning, hvori den fastslog, at den statsgaranti, som var bevilget EPAC, udgjorde en støtte til fordel for denne virksomhed, da den herved havde opnået et lån på mere fordelagtige vilkår end dem, den kunne have opnået uden garantien henset til dens vanskelige finansielle situation.
EPAC constituted aid to that undertaking, since it had enabled it to obtain loan conditions which were more favourable than it would have been able to obtain without that guarantee, in view of its difficult financial situation.
Hvis den portugisiske regering fandt det nødvendigt, kunne den i øvrigt have rettet en forespørgsel herom til Kommissionen, så snart den havde modtaget den anfægtede beslutning.
Moreover, it was open to the Portuguese Government, if necessary, to take up the matter with the Commission upon receipt of the decision at issue.
Den Portugisiske Republik og EPAC har indgivet to annullationssøgsmål vedrørende den anfægtede beslutning ved stævninger indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor henholdsvis den 23. september 1997 (sag C-330/97) og til Rettens Justitskontor den 14. oktober 1997 (T-270/97).
The Portuguese Republic and EPAC, by applications lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 23 September 1997 (C-330/97) and at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 14 October 1997 (T-270/97) respectively, brought two actions for annulment against the contested decision.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at pålæggene i den anfægtede beslutnings artikel 2 var uforståelige, da der ikke havde fundet nogen overførsel af midler sted, er det således tilstrækkeligt at bemærke, at det ikke er nødvendigt for, at en foranstaltning udgør en støtte i traktatens artikel 92, stk. l's forstand, at der har fundet nogen overførsel af midler sted fra staten til støttemodtageren.
By two orders of 15 December 1998, the Court of Justice decided to stay proceedings in Cases C246/97 and C-330/97 pending judgments of the Court of First Instance in Cases T-204/97 and T270/97.
Ved to kendelser af 15. december 1998 har Domstolen besluttet at udsætte retsforhandlingerne i sagerne C-246/97 og C330/97, indtil Retten har afsagt dom i sagerne T204/97 og T-270/97.
So far as concerns the allegedly incomprehensible nature of the orders in Article 2 of the decision at issue on the ground that there had been no transfer of resources, it is sufficient to point out that, in order for a measure to constitute aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty, it is not necessary for there to have been a transfer of resources from the State to the beneficiary.
Forpligtelsen til at tilbagesøge en ulovlig støtte er ikke afhængig af, under hvilken form støtten er ydet.
Moreover, the obligation to cancel unlawful aid by way of its recovery cannot depend on the form in which the aid was granted.
Da Kommissionen fandt, at Den Portugisiske Republik ikke havde efterkommet den anfægtede beslutning trods udløbet af de fastsatte frister, og at den ikke havde gjort gældende, at det var absolut umuligt at efterkomme beslutningen, eller at der var andre vanskeligheder forbundet med dennes gennemførelse, anlagde Kommissionen den foreliggende sag.
Taking the view that, despite the expiry of the prescribed time-limit, the Portuguese Republic had not complied with the decision at issue and that it had not claimed that it was absolutely impossible for it to comply or put forward any other difficulties relating to its implementation, the Commission brought the present action.
Endvidere skal bemærkes, at det på grundlag af den anfægtede beslutnings begrundelse er muligt præcist at identificere den støtte, der er erklæret ulovlig, og som kræves ophævet, nemlig den statsgaranti, som blev bevilget ved beslutning nr. 430/96-XIII.
Next, it must be observed that the statement of the reasons for the decision at issue makes it possible to identify with precision the aid which is considered to be unlawful and which requires to be cancelled, namely the State guarantee granted by way of the abovementioned Decision No 430/96-XIII.
Domstolen har allerede fastslået, at den eneste indsigelse, som kan gøres gældende over for en af Kommissionen i henhold til traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, nedlagt traktatbrudspåstand, er indsigelsen om, at det er absolut umuligt at gennemføre beslutningen korrekt.
The Court has already held that the only defence available to a Member State in opposing an application by the Commission under Article 93(2) of the Treaty for a declaration that it has failed to fulfil its Treaty obligations is to plead that it was absolutely impossible for it to implement the decision properly.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at det var retligt umuligt at gennemføre den anfægtede beslutning, har den portugisiske regering vedrørende garantiens ophævelse gjort gældende, at en aftale med EPAC's kreditorbanker på forhånd klart var udelukket, eftersom disse ikke uden fornøden sikkerhed ville samtykke deri, uden at regeringen dog har oplyst, at der er gjort noget forsøg på en forhandling med disse banker.
As regards the assertion that it was legally impossible to implement the decision at issue, the Portuguese Government stated, with regard to the cancellation of the guarantee, that an agreement with EPAC's bank creditors was clearly out of the question since they would never agree to it, in the absence of a guarantee, but it made no mention of any attempt at negotiating with them.