฀ $EN฀ T R E D J E ฀ G R UP P E ฀ AF฀ S I T U A T I O N ER฀ � ฀ SOM฀ER฀ M E G ET฀ BE K LA GE L IG ฀ FOR฀ MANGE฀ %5 B O R GERE฀ � ฀ ER฀ DEN฀ HVOR฀ O G S � ฀ A FG � R E L S EN฀ ER฀ TRUFFET฀ INDEN฀ FORORDNINGENS฀ I K R A FT T R � DEN฀ $ ET฀ ER฀ NATURLIGVIS฀ U M U L I GT ฀ AT฀ ANVENDE฀ ANERKEN D E L S EffS P R O C E D U R EN฀ I฀ DISSE฀ SAGER฀ IDET฀ DE฀ IKKE฀ER฀ OMFATTET฀ AF฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ I฀ FORORDNING฀ % & ฀ N R ฀ ฀ $ETTE฀ R EffS U L T AT฀ A C C E P T E R EffS ฀ AF฀ IN D L Y S E N DE฀ GRUNDE฀ IKKE฀ S � R L IG ฀ G O D T ฀ AF฀ MANGE฀ %5 B O R GERE฀ 3 I T U A T I O N EN฀ A D S K I L LER฀ SIG฀ S � L E D EffS ฀ FRA฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ I฀(AAGERKONVENTIONEN฀ AF฀ ฀ J U N I฀ ฀ SOM฀ NOGLE฀MEDLEMSSTATER฀ ER฀ PARTER฀ I฀ HVOREFTER฀ KONVENTIONEN฀ G � L DER฀ U AN S ET฀ H V O R N � R ฀ SEPARATIONEN฀ ELLER฀ SKILS M I S S EN฀ ER฀ O PN� ET฀ OM฀ END฀ D OG฀MEDLEMSSTATERNE฀ H A R ฀MULIG HED฀ FOR฀ KUN฀ AT฀ ANVENDE฀ DEN฀ P� ฀ S E P A R A T I O N ER฀ OG฀ SKILS M I S S ER฀DER฀ ER฀ O PN� ET฀ EFTER฀ KONVENTIONENS฀ I K R A FT T R � D E N IV. Anerkendelse og fuldbyrdelse af retsafgłrelser
฀ & I R S T L Y ฀ AND฀ AS฀ FAR฀ AS฀ JUDGMENTS฀ IN฀MATRIMONIAL฀ CASES฀ ARE฀ CONCERNED฀ THE฀ DECISION฀ MUST฀ BE฀ PO S I TIVE฀ AS฀ EM E R G E S ฀ FROM฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀ FOR M E R L Y ฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀ ฀ WHICH฀ M AK E S ฀ IT฀ CLEAR฀ THAT฀ THE฀ JUDGMENT฀ MUST฀ BE฀ ONE฀ G R AN TING฀ A฀ DI V O R C E ฀ LEGAL฀ SEPARATION฀ OR฀MARRIAGE฀ AN N U L MENT฀ 4HAT฀MEANS฀ THAT฀ IF฀ THE฀ DECISION฀ IS฀ N E G A TIVE฀ IT฀ IS฀ POSSIBLE฀ TO฀ BRING฀ ACTION฀ BEFORE฀ THE฀COURTS฀OF฀ THE฀ OTHER฀-EMBER฀ 3TATE฀ HAVING฀ JURISDICTION฀ UNDER฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀ 4HE฀ INTERPRETATION฀ IS฀ THEREFORE฀ F A V OR฀ N E G O T I I ฀ - O RE OVER฀ IT฀MUST฀BE฀BORNE฀ IN฀MIND฀ THAT฀ ONLY฀ PO S I TIVE฀ D E C I SIONS฀ HAVE฀ THE฀ FOR C E ฀ OF฀ RE S ฀ JU DI C A T A฀ 4HAT฀ RAISES฀ THE฀ Q U E S TION฀OF฀WHETHER฀THIS฀INTERPRETATION฀APPLIES฀ONLY฀TO฀DIVORCE฀AND฀SEPARATION฀ OR฀ ALSO฀ TO฀ AN N U L MENT฀ )N฀ "O N O M IS฀ VIEW฀ ฀ IT฀ COULD฀ NOT฀ APPLY฀ TO฀ AN N U L MENT฀ SINCE฀ IN฀ THAT฀ CASE฀ THE฀ PROBLEM฀ IS฀ E X ฀ T U N C ฀ I E ฀ IT฀ E X I S T E D ฀ AT฀ THE฀ TIME฀ THAT฀ THE฀MARRIAGE฀ WAS฀ CONTRAC T E D ฀ )N฀MY฀ VIEW฀ THERE฀ IS฀ NO฀ SUCH฀ DISTINCTION฀ SINCE฀ IN฀ THE฀ EVENT฀OF฀ A฀ N E G A TIVE฀ DECISION฀ WHETHER฀ IT฀ RE L A T E S ฀ TO฀ DI V O R C E ฀ OR฀ TO฀ AN N U L MENT฀ THE฀MARRIAGE฀ CON T IN U E S ฀ TO ฀EX I S T ฀ AND฀ THERE฀ IS฀ THEREFORE฀ NO฀ RE A S ON฀ NOT฀ TO฀ AL L O W ฀ FURTHER฀ RE C O U R S E ฀ & OR฀ THE฀ RE Q U I RE MENT฀ THAT฀ THE฀ DECISION฀ BE฀ PO S I TIVE฀ SEE฀ PO IN T ฀ ฀OF฀THE฀ "O R R � S ฀ REPORT� ฀ AGAINST฀ THIS฀ INTERPRETATION฀ SEE฀ ( ฀ 4 A G A R AS฀ @ 1 U E S TION฀ S P �C I AL E S ฀ RE L A T I V E S ฀ � ฀ L U N I l C A TION฀ COMMUNAUTAIRE฀DU฀DROIT฀ INTERNATIONAL฀ P R I V � ฀DE ฀ L A฀ F A M I L L E ฀ R � G L E MENT฀ ฀ OP ฀ C IT฀ P ฀ ฀ " ฀ ! N C E L ฀ AND฀ ( ฀ - U I R ฀ 7 A T T ฀ PO IN T ฀ OUT฀ IN฀ @ , A฀ D � S U N I ON฀ E U R OP �E N N E ฀ L E ฀ R � G L E MENT฀ D IT฀ @ @ " R U X E L L E S ฀ ) ฀ ฀ OP ฀ C IT฀ P ฀ ฀ THAT฀ THIS฀SOLUTION฀WAS฀ADOPTED฀IN฀ RE S PO N S E ฀ TO฀ 3 C AN D IN A V I AN฀ P RE S S U RE ฀ ! ฀ "O N O M I ฀ @ ) L ฀ 2 E G O L A M E N TO฀ COMUNITARIO฀SULLA฀COMPETENZA฀E฀SUL฀ RICONOSCIMENTO฀IN฀MATERIA฀ M A T R I M O N I AL E ฀ E ฀ DI ฀ PO T E S T � ฀DE I ฀ G E N I TO R I ฀ OP ฀ C IT฀ P P ฀ n ฀ !S฀ STATED฀ IN฀ CONNECTION฀ WITH฀ LIS฀ PENDENS฀ THERE฀ IS฀ ANOTHER฀ RULE฀ WHICH฀ WOULD฀ OF฀ ITSELF฀ JU S T IF Y ฀ THE฀ ADOPTION฀OF฀ THE฀REGULATION ฀ )T฀ IS฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀ FOR