natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolen udtalte, at de bestemmelser, der vedrører tildeling af ydelser i henhold til den tyske plejeforsikring, tillægger de ydelsesberettigede et ved lov fastsat krav, og at de nævnte ydelser med henblik på at forbedre plejekrævende personers sundhedstilstand og levevilkår i det væsentlige har til formål at supplere ydelserne fra sygeforsikringen.
That eventuality, referred to in a Council regulation in restrictive terms, is a matter that falls within the scope of the protection of the rights of others', which, according to Article 10(2) of the ECHR as interpreted by the Court of Human Rights, is such as to justify restricting freedom of expression. Consequently, the appellant's allegations that the second paragraph of Article 17 of the Staff Regulations does not pursue a legitimate aim and that the restriction of freedom of expression is not prescribed by a legislative provision must be rejected.
Hvad angår plejeydelsens finansieringsmåde har BPGG, der har indført plejeydelsen, til formål at indføre et system, der på hele det nationale område sikrer alle personer, der har et plejebehov, ens kontantydelser, og således supplere sikringen af de i visse delstater på regionalt plan allerede sikrede sociale risici, der er forbundet med plejebehov.
The fact that the restriction at issue takes the form of prior permission cannot render it contrary, as such, to the fundamental right of freedom of expression.
Efter fast praksis kan en ydelse anses for en social sikringsydelse, såfremt den tildeles de berettigede uden nogen individuel bedømmelse af personlige behov, men efter lovbestemte kriterier og forudsat, at den vedrører én af de risici, der udtrykkelig er anført i artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 1408/71.
That is the aim of the regulations setting out the duties and responsibilities of the European public service. So an official may not, by oral or written expression, act in breach of his obligations under the regulations, particularly Articles 11, 12 and 17, towards the institution that he is supposed to serve.
Det var i henhold til denne retspraksis og under hensyn til de væsentlige kendetegn ved ydelserne i henhold til den tyske plejeforsikring, at Domstolen i præmis 25 i Molenaar-dommen udtalte, at de nævnte ydelser måtte anses for »ydelser i anledning af sygdom« i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 1408/71, og i samme doms præmis 36, som »kontantydelser« fra sygeforsikringen i henhold til forordningens artikel 19, stk. 1, litra b).
That would destroy the relationship of trust between himself and that institution and make it thereafter more difficult, if not impossible, for the work of the institution to be carried out in cooperation with that official.
I hovedsagen kan plejeydelsen på nationalt plan ganske vist muligvis kvalificeres anderledes. Den har imidlertid den samme natur som de i Molenaar-dommen omhandlede tyske plejeforsikringsydelser og tildeles ligeledes objektivt efter lovbestemte kriterier.
In exercising their power of review, the Community Courts must decide, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, whether a fair balance has been struck between the individual's fundamental right to freedom of expression and the legitimate concern of the institution to ensure that its officials and agents observe the duties and responsibilities implicit in the performance of their tasks.
Således er udbetalingen af kontantydelser i hovedsagen i første række sikret af de for den lovpligtige pensions- og ulykkesforsikring kompetente institutioner. BPGG's § 23 bestemmer, at de af de nævnte institutioner således udlagte beløb efterfølgende refunderes af forbundsstaten i form af en godtgørelse af udgifter.
Indeed, in so far as that provision enables institutions to refuse permission to publish, and thus potentially interfere to a serious extent with freedom of expression, one of the fundamental pillars of a democratic society, it must be interpreted restrictively and applied in strict compliance with the requirements mentioned in paragraph 41 above.
Den østrigske regering har på statsbudgettet tilvejebragt de nødvendige midler til denne udgift, idet den har nedsat forbundstilskuddet til pensionsforsikringen.
Thus, permission to publish may be refused only where publication is liable to cause serious harm to the Communities' interests.
Betingelserne for tildeling af plejeydelse og dennes finansieringsmåde kan — som det fremgår af Molenaar-dommen - ikke have til formål eller til følge, at plejeydelsens natur ændres. I henhold til den nævnte dom har sådanne ydelser i det væsentlige til formål at supplere ydelserne fra sygeforsikringen, som de i øvrigt organisatorisk er
As the Court of Human Rights has held in that regard, it must '[be borne in mind] that whenever civil servants' right to freedom of expression is in issue the "duties and responsibilities" referred to in Article 10(2) assume a special significance, which justifies leaving to the national authorities a certain
Det skal fastslås, at fællesskabsretten hverken indeholder et princip eller en bestemmelse, der
Furthermore, as their scope is restricted to publications dealing with the work of the Communities, the rules are designed solely to allow the institution to keep itself informed of the views expressed in writing by its officials or
mere til udtryk som udtagningen af midler fra sygeforsikringen sker via bidragsandelen af indtægterne. Plejeydelsen er derfor en bidragspligtig ydelse.
other employees about its work so as to satisfy itself that they are carrying out their duties and conducting themselves with the interests of the Communities in mind and not in a way that would adversely reflect on their position.
Plejeydelsen opfylder således ikke betingelserne i artikel 10a i forordning nr. 1408/71, hvorefter de i forordningens artikel 4, stk. 2a, omhandlede særlige ikke-bidragspligtige ydelser forbeholdes personer, der er bosat i den medlemsstat, hvor de udbetales.
It follows that the Court of First Instance was entitled to conclude, as it did in paragraph 156 of the contested judgment, that the allegation of breach of the right to freedom of expression, resulting from the application thereto of the second paragraph of Article 17 of the Staff Regulations, was unfounded.
forbyder en medlemsstats lovgiver at indføre forskellige sociale beskyttelsesordninger for forskellige sociale eller faglige grupper.
Remedies against a decision refusing permission are available under Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations.
Den omstændighed, at alene de socialforsikrede modtager den plejeydelse, der er indført ved BPGG, kan ikke i sig selv godtgøre, at denne ydelse finansieres gennem deres sygeforsikringsbidrag, heller ikke selv om denne ydelse - ifølge Molenaar-dommen - skal kvalificeres som en »ydelse i anledning af sygdom«.
There is thus no basis for the appellant to claim, as he does, that the rules in Article 17 of the Staff Regulations are not amenable to effective judicial review.
Ingen fællesskabsretlig bestemmelse forbyder, at en national lovgivning karakteriserer dækningen af risikoen for plejebehov og dennes finansiering anderledes end de andre ydelser i anledning af sygdom.
Review of that kind enables the Community Courts to ascertain whether the appointing authority has exercised its power under the second paragraph of Article 17 of the Staff Regulations in strict compliance with the limitations to which any interference with the right to freedom of expression is subject.
Efter bestemmelserne i artikel 19, stk. 1, litra b), i forordning nr. 1408/71 og de tilsvarende bestemmelser i de øvrige afdelinger i kapitel 1 i denne forordnings afsnit III, skal plejeydelsen, der skal anses for en kontantydelse i anledning af sygdom, udbetales uanset i hvilken medlemsstat en person med plejebehov, der opfylder de øvrige betingelser for at få denne tildelt, er bosat.
By his second ground of appeal, the appellant claims that the Court of First Instance failed to apply the second paragraph of Article 17 and Article 35 of the Staff Regulations correctly by holding that officials on leave on personal grounds were also required to obtain permission prior to publishing material.
Finansieringen af plejeydelsen har kunnet gennemføres uden ændringer i ydelserne i anledning af sygdom, alder eller ulykke, gennem forhøjelse af sygeforsikringsbidragene.
Such rules reflect the relationship of trust which must exist between employers and employees, particularly when they discharge high-level responsibilities in the public service.
Denne — ganske vist indirekte — forbindelse med sygeforsikringsbidragene kommer så meget desto
The way in which the rules are applied can be assessed solely in the light of all the relevant circumstances and the implications thereof for the performance of public duties.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
In that respect, the rules meet the criteria set out in paragraph 41 above for the acceptability of interference with the right to freedom of expression.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. december 2000.
It is also clear from the foregoing that, when applying the second paragraph of Article 17 of the Staff Regulations, the appointing authority must balance the various interests at stake and is in a position to do so by taking account, in particular, of the gravity of the potential prejudice to the interests of the Communities.
Præjudiciel »Sjette momsdirektiv (Første Afdeling)
Advocate General D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 19 October 2000. *
Ved kendelse af 10. juni 1999 har Regeringsrätten (Sveriges øverste forvaltningsdomstol) i medfør af artikel 234 EF forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 13, punkt B, litra a), i Rådets sjette direktiv 77/388/EØF af 17. maj 1977.
He proposed that the Court of Justice should declare that the appeal is inadmissible in part and, for the rest, unfounded, for which reason it should be dismissed and the appellant should be ordered to pay the costs.
Den forpligtelse fra Skandia's side, som hovedsagen drejer sig om, var ikke en forsikringsydelse, men måtte derimod anses for en ydelse over for Livbolaget med hensyn til administration og drift.
Case C-278/98 Kingdom of the Netherlands ν Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
Regeringsrätten stadfæstede ved dom af 16. juni 1997 Skatterättsnämdens afgørelse.
1994 — Cereals, beef and veal)
De faktiske omstændigheder i hovedsagen og det præjudicielle spørgsmål
(EAGGF — Clearance of (Sixth Chamber) connection with the prefinancing of export refunds in those sectors.
Skandia er et forsikringsselskab, der bla. har et helejet datterselskab, Livförsäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia (pubi) (herefter »Livbolaget«).
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 21 July 1998, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, sought partial annulment of Commission Decision 98/358/EC of 6 May 1998 on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1994 of the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, in so far as it disallowed expenditure of NLG 16 378 716.63 incurred by the applicant in connection with the prefinancing of export refunds.
Den forelæggende ret ønsker med sit spørgsmål nærmere bestemt oplyst, hvorvidt et forsikringsselskabs påtagelse af en forpligtelse til mod et honorar, der beregnes i henhold til markedsvilkårene, at drive et helejet forsikringsselskabs virksomhed, når det sidstnævnte selskab fortsætter med at indgå forsikringsaftaler i eget navn, udgør en forsikringstransaktion i sjette direktivs artikel 13, punkt B, litra a)'s forstand.
The sum represents flat-rate corrections of 10% for the cereals sector and 5% for the beef and veal sector to the expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1994 in
Det skal i den forbindelse bemærkes, at sjette direktiv ikke definerer begrebet »forsikringstransaktioner«.
In 1994, the EAGGF carried out investigations in the Netherlands into the application of the Community arrangements for the prefinancing of export refunds in 1992 and 1993. The
identiteten af den, der modtager ydelsen, er af betydning med hensyn til definitionen af den type tjenesteydelser, der er omhandlet i sjette direktivs artikel 13, punkt B, litra a), og at en forsikringstransaktion efter sin art kræver, at der består et kontraktforhold mellem den, der præsterer forsikringsydelsen, og den, hvis risiko dækkes af forsikringen, nemlig den forsikrede.
They included investigations carried out in February 1994 at the Hoofdproduktschap Akkerbouwprodukten (Central Board for Agricultural Products, hereinafter the ΗΡΑ').
Forsikringstransaktioner kan ikke fortolkes i vid forstand som omfattende alle tjenesteydelser, der præsteres mellem forsikringsselskaber, som Skandia har hævdet.
In that notification the Commission set out the main complaints to which it had already drawn attention, relating in particular to the organisation of physical checks in the Netherlands.
Såfremt begrebet »forsikringstransaktioner« skulle fortolkes på denne måde, ville »tjenesteydelser i forbindelse med ... [forsikringsjtransaktioner« være omfattet af begrebet forsikringstransaktioner, således at præciseringen i artikel 13, punkt B, litra a), ville være uden enhver betydning.
It therefore proposed, for 1993 and 1994, flat-rate corrections of 10% in respect of the cereals sector and 5% in respect of the beef and veal sector.
Det er forkert at antage, at forsikringsselskaber — for så vidt som medlemsstaterne i henhold til forsikringsdirektiverne skal kræve, at de begrænser deres formål til forsikringsvirksomhed og dermed direkte forbundne forretninger med udelukkelse af enhver anden erhvervsmæssig virksomhed - kun gennemfører forsikringstransaktioner, der er momsfritaget i henhold til sjette direktivs artikel 13, punkt B, litra a).
On 22 September 1995 the Commission drew up the Summary Report on the results of the investigations carried out for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section for 1992, a report which was subsequently amended by communications of 25 October and 20 November 1995 (hereinafter the 1992 Summary Report').
Det forhold, at et forsikringsselskab ikke må udøve anden erhvervsmæssig virksomhed end forsikringstransaktioner og dermed direkte forbundne forretninger, betyder således ikke, at alle transaktioner, forsikringsselskabet gennemfører, afgiftsmæssigt er forsikringstransaktioner i streng forstand, som omhandlet i sjette direktivs artikel 13, punkt B, litra a).
On 3 February 1997, the Commission's summary report on the results of the investigations carried out for the clearance of the EAGGF Guarantee Section accounts for 1993 (hereinafter the 1993 Summary Report') was drawn up. On the basis of the Commission's findings, flat-rate corrections of 10% for the cereals sector and 5% for the beef and veal sector were determined for 1993.
I overensstemmelse med definitionen af en forsikringstransaktion må det antages, at
By official notification of 28 June 19% concerning the application of flat-rate corrections in respect of 1993 and 1994, the Commission informed the Kingdom of the Netherlands 'of the final conclusions of the investigation into the arrangements and procedures applied by the
Generaladvokat A. Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 26. september 2000.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 19 October 2000.
Sag C-316/99 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland Landbrug
(Social security for migrant workers - Austrian scheme of insurance against the risk of reliance on care — Classification of benefits and lawfulness of the residence condition from the point of view of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71) (Full Court)
96/43/EF manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist«
By order of 16 March 1999, received at the Court on 7 June 1999, the Landesgericht (Regional Court) Feldkirch referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 10a(l) and 19(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971.
»Traktatbrud — direktiv (Første Afdeling)
rejected Mr Jauch's claim for care allowance under the BPGG.
Det bestemmes imidlertid i artikel 4, stk. 1, andet afsnit, i direktiv 96/43:
Since the competent authorities in Austria and Germany had thus refused him the right to an allowance in connection with his reliance on care, Mr Jauch brought proceedings against those refusals in both Member States.
»Medlemsstaterne har en yderligere frist indtil senest den 1. juli 1999 til at efterkomme bestemmelserne i bilag A, kapitel III, sektion I.«
That question has been raised in proceedings between Mr Jauch and the Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter (Workers' Pension Insurance Institution) concerning the latter's refusal to pay Mr Jauch the Pflegegeld (care allowance) provided for by the Bundespflegegeldgesetz (Austrian Federal Law on care allowance, (the BPGG').
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 24. august 1999 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af artikel 226 EF anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EF-traktaten og Rådets direktiv 96/43/EF af 26. juni 1996, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har truffet alle de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme dette direktiv.
In the Austrian proceedings brought before the Landesgericht Feldkirch, the defendant in the main proceedings submitted that the action should be dismissed on the ground that care allowance under the BPGG is expressly listed in Annex IIa to Regulation No 1408/71 as a special noncontributory benefit within the meaning of Article 10a of that regulation, available only to persons who reside in the territory of the Member State concerned.
»Medlemsstaterne meddeler Kommissionen teksten til de vigtigste nationale retsforskrifter, som de udsteder på det område, der er omfattet af dette direktiv.«
The Landesgericht Feldkirch accordingly decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
I artikel 4, stk. 1, første afsnit, i direktiv 96/43 er det vedrørende iværksættelsen af bestemmelserne i direktiv 85/73, som ændret og kodificeret ved direktiv 96/43, fastsat:
He thus completed a total of 480 insurance months in Austria, and has since 1 May 1995 been in receipt of a retirement pension paid by the Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter.
Den tyske regering har i svarskriftet ikke bestridt, at direktiv 96/43 ikke er blevet gennemført fuldt ud, men har gjort gældende, at dette skyldes, at direktivet i flere henseender er lidet klart og endog selvmodsigende.
'Is it contrary to Article 19(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in its current version, to make entitlement to care allowance under the Bundespflegegeldgesetz (BPGG) (Austrian Federal Law on care allowance, BGBl.
»Medlemsstaterne sætter de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme i) bestemmelserne i artikel 7 og i bilag A, kapitel I, punkt 1, litra e), den 1. juli 1996
However, from 1 September 1996 to 31 August 1998, by virtue of a decision of 28 November 1996, he received German care insurance benefits paid by the Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse (AOK) Bayern, Pflegekasse Lindau (General Local Health Insurance Fund for Bavaria, Lindau Care Fund).
Sagen bør anses for begrundet, for så vidt som den angår den omstændighed, at de tyske myndigheder ikke har truffet de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme artikel 4, stk. 1, første afsnit, i direktiv 96/43.
By this question the national court is essentially asking whether care allowance under the BPGG can be regarded as a special noncontributory benefit within the meaning of Article 10a of Regulation No 1408/71, which provides that the persons concerned are to be granted such a benefit exclusively in the territory of the Member State in which they reside and in accordance with the legislation of that State, or whether the
har truffet de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige, for at efterkomme artikel 4, stk. 1, andet afsnit,
residence condition for the grant of that allowance is contrary to Article 19(1) of Regulation No 1408/71 and the corresponding provisions of the other sections of Chapter 1 of Title III of that regulation.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Regulation No 1408/71, must be interpreted strictly.
»1) Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 4, stk 1, første afsnit, i Rådets direktiv 96/43/EF af 26. juni 1996 om ændring og kodifikation af direktiv 85/73/EØF med henblik på finansiering af veterinærundersøgelse og -kontrol af levende dyr og visse animalske produkter og om ændring af direktiv 90/675/EØF og 91/496/EØF, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har vedtaget alle de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme bestemmelserne i dette afsnit.
It follows that Article 10a can apply only to benefits which satisfy the conditions defined in Article 4(2a) of Regulation No 1408/71, that is, benefits which are both special and noncontributory and are listed in Annex Ha to that regulation.
I øvrigt frifindes Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland.
As noted in paragraph 6 above, care allowance is included on the list of special noncontributory cash benefits within the meaning of Article 4(2a) of Regulation No 1408/71 which forms Annex Ha to that regulation.
Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland betaler sagens omkostninger.«
It considers that the risk of 'reliance on care' is closer to the risk of 'poverty' than to that of *sickness'.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
However, the Court has already decided this point in the Molenaar case.
Sag C-266/00 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
Furthermore, Article 10a of Regulation No 1408/71 reserves the special noncontributory cash benefits referred to in Article 4(2a) of the regulation to persons residing on national territory, provided that those benefits are listed in Annex Ha to the regulation.
»Traktatbrud - direktiv 91/676/EØF« (Tredje Afdeling) har sat de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme direktivets artikel 5, stk. 4 og 6, og artikel 10, stk. 1, sammenholdt med bilag II, afsnit A, bilag III, punkt 1, nr. 3, og bilag V, punkt 4, litra e), til direktivet.
It was on the basis of that case-law, taking account of the constituent elements of the German care insurance benefits, that the Court held, in paragraph 25 of Molenaar, that those benefits were to be regarded as *sickness benefits' within the meaning of Article 4(1) (a) of Regulation No 1408/71 and, in paragraph 36 of that judgment, that they were to be regarded as 'cash benefits' of sickness insurance as referred to inter alia in Article 19(l)(b) ofthat regulation.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 30. juni 2000 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 91/676/EØF af 12. december 1991, idet det ikke
In that context, it is permissible for the Community legislature to adopt provisions which derogate from the principle of the exportability of social security benefits (see, inter alia, Snares, paragraph 41). Derogating provisions of that kind, such as those provided for by Article 10a of
Den administrative procedure åbningsskrivelse, hvori det blev anmodet om at fremkomme med sine bemærkninger hertil inden for en frist på to måneder. Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg besvarede åbningsskrivelsen den 17. juni 1998.
In the case in point in the main proceedings, while care allowance may possibly have a different legal regime at national level, it nevertheless remains of the same kind as the German care insurance benefits at issue in Molenaar, and is likewise granted objectively on the basis of a legally defined situation.