natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Gruppens forslag om at give Kommissionen ret til i sin egenskab af "traktatens vogter" at indlede overtrædelsesprocedurer på alle områder blev generelt godkendt ligesom forslaget om i højere grad at anvende ordninger med peer review (der ifølge nogle har en særlig betydning navnlig for en konsolidering af anvendelsen af gensidig anerkendelse af strafferetlige afgørelser).
The Group's proposal that the Commission be given the right, as "guardian of the Treaty", to initiate infringement proceedings in all areas was generally approved, as was the proposal that increased use be made of "peer review mechanisms" (which some believed were of particular importance, specifically in consolidating application of the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters).
Nogle konventsmedlemmer lagde vægt på betydningen af de eksterne forbindelser i politikkerne for retlige og indre anliggender.
Some Convention members emphasised the importance of external relations in justice and home affairs policies.
Et konventsmedlem ønskede, at Arbejdsgruppen vedrørende EU's Optræden Udadtil skal overveje muligheden af at sikre, at medlemsstaterne kan bevare en passende frihed til at handle udadtil på disse områder.
One member asked the Working Group on External Action to consider how to ensure that Member States retained sufficient freedom to take external action in these areas.
Et stort flertal af konventsmedlemmerne mente, at de generelle regler vedrørende Domstolen bør kunne anvendes på området med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed.
A large majority of Convention members felt that the general rules on the Court of Justice should be made applicable to matters relating to the area of freedom, security and justice.
Selv om nogle konventsmedlemmer principielt kunne acceptere dette punkt, ønskede de imidlertid, at grænserne for Domstolens kompetence trods afskaffelsen af søjlerne bevares i forbindelse med foranstaltninger vedrørende politi og lov og orden/indre sikkerhed, som de nationale myndigheder træffer (jf. artikel 35, stk. 5, i TEU).
While they agreed with this point in principle, some Convention members, despite abolition of the pillars, wanted the limits on the Court's jurisdiction with regard to police and law and order/internal security measures taken by national authorities (see Article 35(5) TEU) to be maintained.
Andre kunne acceptere de forslag, som gruppen har fremsat, men henledte opmærksomheden på den arbejdsbyrde, der kunne følge heraf for Domstolen på visse områder såsom asyl; disse medlemmer ønskede derfor at inddrage spørgsmålet om reformen af Domstolen i konventets drøftelser om institutionerne.
Others, while accepting the Group's proposals, drew attention to the possible attendant workload for the Court in certain areas such as asylum; they therefore wanted the issue of Court reform included in the Convention’s debate on the institutions.
Med hensyn til de operationelle aspekter mente flertallet af talerne, at den nuværende situation er utilfredsstillende, og glædede sig over de forslag, som gruppen har fremsat i sin rapport.
With regard to the operational aspects, most speakers found the current situation unsatisfactory and welcomed the proposals the Group had put forward in its report.
Muligheden for, at Rådet eller Det Europæiske Råd vedtager et flerårigt handlingsprogram fik støtte fra mange konventsmedlemmer, selv om nogle udtrykte tvivl i den forbindelse.
Many Convention members supported the prospect of the Council or European Council adopting a multiannual programme of action, though some voiced doubts.
Forslaget om i Rådet at indføre en styrket koordinationsstruktur på grundlag af artikel 36 i TEU, der skal sørge for koordinering af samtlige operationelle aktiviteter vedrørende politi og sikkerhed (politisamarbejde, fremme af samarbejdet mellem Europol og Eurojust, peer review, civilbeskyttelse), blev positivt modtaget.
The proposal that a reinforced coordination structure be set up within the Council on the basis of Article 36 TEU, covering the coordination of all police and security operations (police cooperation, facilitation of cooperation between Europol Eurojust, peer review, civil protection), was well received.
Et konventsmedlem fandt, at det kun er et skridt i den rigtige retning, og at målet er at indsætte en ansvarlig eller højtstående repræsentant for området med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed.
One Convention member regarded the proposal as merely a step in the right direction and felt that an official or high representative responsible for the area of freedom, security and justice should be set in place.
Adskillige konventsmedlemmer støttede en mere tilpasset definition i traktaten af Europols kompetencer ved at indføre et nyt retsgrundlag.
On Europol, many Convention members agreed that a more appropriate definition of its powers should be included in the Treaty by introducing a new legal basis.
Nogle ønskede, at Europol på visse betingelser gives egentlige efterforsknings- og handlingsbeføjelser på alle medlemsstaternes områder, og at de ændringer, der foretages i Europols vedtægt og funktionsmåde, kan vedtages med kvalificeret flertal; andre gav udtryk for forbehold.
Some wanted Europol, under certain conditions, to be given real investigative and operational powers covering the entire territory of the Member States and the changes to its statute and mode of operation to be adopted by qualified majority: others entertained reservations.
Spørgsmålet om den demokratiske kontrol med Europol blev nævnt flere gange, og flere talere glædede sig over muligheden for en øget kontrol fra Europa-Parlamen-tets side.
The question of the democratic control of Europol was raised on numerous occasions, several speakers welcoming the prospect of the European Parliament exercising closer scrutiny.
Andre var enige heri, men ønskede, at denne demokratiske kontrol udvides til at gælde de nationale parlamenter, og fandt gruppens forslag om at inddrage de nationale parlamenter i behandlingen af Europols årsberetninger for begrænset.
Others concurred with this view but wanted to see democratic scrutiny extended to national Parliaments, finding the Group's proposal that national parliaments be involved in the consideration of Europol's annual reports too limited.
Med hensyn til forvaltning af de ydre grænser fandt flere talere det ønskeligt gradvis at nå til et egentlig fælles integreret forvaltningssystem.
On the question of the management of external borders, a good number of speakers thought it was desirable to move gradually towards a genuine common integrated management system.
Et konventsmedlem mente i øvrigt, at processen allerede var i gang med pilotforsøg i visse kandidatlande.
One member of the Convention in fact thought that the process had already been initiated with trials in certain candidate countries.
Flere talere mindede om behovet for solidaritet, også finansielt, mellem medlemsstaterne.
Several speakers pointed to the need for solidarity, including financial solidarity, between Member States.
De så gerne, at Eurojust fik stillet midler til rådighed til sin fremtidige udvikling.
They wanted Eurojust to have the means to develop in the future.
Ofte på baggrund af analysen af Eurojust blev spørgsmålet om den europæiske anklagemyndighedgjort til genstand for en indgående debat mellem konventsmedlemmerne. Nogle udtrykte klar principiel modstand mod ethvert forslag i den retning.
A question arising frequently during the analysis of Eurojust was that of a European Public Prosecutor or a Public Prosecutor's Office; this issue was discussed in depth by the members of the Convention, with a number of them expressing their unqualified opposition in principle to any approach along these lines.
De gjorde bl.a. gældende, at forskellen mellem den retlige status i visse medlemsstater gør det vanskeligt at forestille sig en europæisk anklagemyndighed.
They pointed out in particular that the differences in legal systems as between Member States would make it difficult to conceive of a European Public Prosecutor or Public Prosecutor's Office.
Andre understregede, at Eurojust bør gøres til forløber for en europæisk anklagemyndighed.
Others stressed that Eurojust should foreshadow the function of a European Public Prosecutor.
Ifølge nogle bør der skabes et retsgrundlag, der gør en sådan udvikling mulig.
In the view of some members, a legal basis should be created which would provide for or permit such a development.
Nogle mente, at afgørelserne på området bør vedtages med kvalificeret flertal.
Other members thought decisions on this matter shoudl be adopted by qualified majority.
De fandt konklusionerne i gruppens rapport på dette område for forsigtige.
They thought the conclusions on this issue in the Group's report were over-cautious.
Flere talere anførte ligeledes, at såfremt en sådan anklagemyndighed oprettes, bør den kun være ansvarlig for beskyttelsen af EU's finansielle interesser, mens andre mente, at den bør udøve en bredere kompetence og også dække andre alvorlige forbrydelser.
Several speakers also said that if such a Public Prosecutor were to be established, he should be responsible only for the protection of the Union's financial interests, while others thought he should have a wider remit to cover other serious crimes.
Blandt de horisontale spørgsmål, der optræder i rapporten, er spørgsmålet om de nationale parlamenters rolle det, der blev nævnt hyppigst.
One of the horizontal questions addressed in the report and most frequently raised was that of the role of national parliaments.
Alle de talere, der udtalte sig om emnet, understregede de nationale parlamenters særlige ansvar på området med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed.
All those who spoke on the subject underlined the particular responsibility borne by national parliaments as regards the area of freedom, security and justice.
Nogle konventsmedlemmer fandt forslagene i rapporten hensigtsmæssige, mens andre fandt dem utilstrækkelige.
A number of members thought the suggestions made in the report were satisfactory while others regarded them as inadequate.
Spørgsmålet om opting in/opting out-mekanismerne blev kun kort nævnt; det blev sagt, at disse mekanismer, som rapporten i øvrigt foreslår, skal behandles i en bredere sammenhæng.
The question of the opting-in/opting-out arrangements was raised only to consider whether, as the report suggests, these arrangements should be examined in a broader context.
Som afslutning på talernes indlæg gav John Bruton en række svar eller præciseringer, hvorefter det var op til formanden for konventet at sammenfatte debatten.
Following speakers' interventions, Mr Bruton replied to a number of questions and clarified certain points; it then fell to the Chairman of the Convention to draw the necessary conclusions from the debate.
Formanden glædede sig over den generelt positive modtagelse af arbejdsgruppens resultater.
The Chairman welcomed the fact that the Working Group's results had on the whole been given a favourable reception.
Han understregede betydningen af emnet og de fremskridt, der foreslås på området.
He emphasised the importance of the matter dealt with and of the proposals for the future.
Han konstaterede, at der er bred enighed om følgende elementer: nu l l
Merges of the current provisions in Title VI of the TEU with those of the EC Treaty.
For så vidt angår den eventuelle oprettelse af en europæisk offentlig anklagemyndighed noterede formanden sig afslutningsvis de forskellige synspunkter og slog til lyd for en uddybning af dette punkt.
Finally, the Chairman noted that opinions differed on the possible creation of a European Public Prosecutor or a Public Prosecutor's Office and hoped that there would be more detailed discussion of this point.
Formanden konkluderede derpå, at konventet vil vende tilbage til spørgsmålet om et område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed på grundlag af de forslag til artikler, som præsidiet skal forelægge.
The Chairman then concluded by saying that the Convention would return to the subject of the area of freedom, security and justice on the basis of proposals for articles put to it by the Praesidium.
KONVENTETS NÆSTE MØDE
NEXT MEETING OF THE CONVENTION
Formanden oplyste, at konventets næste møde finder sted fredag den 20. december kl. 9.30.
The Chairman announced that the next meeting of the Convention would take place on Friday 20 December, starting at 9.30.
Der vil blive foretaget en gennemgang af rapporterne fra Arbejdsgruppe VII vedrørende EU's Optræden Udadtil og Arbejdsgruppe VIII vedrørende Forsvar.
It would be devoted to examination of the reports of Working Groups VII and VIII ("External Action" and "Defence").
Plenarmødet den 5.-6. december 2002 TALERLISTEefter indlæggenes rækkefølge
Plenary session on 5 and 6 December 2002 LIST OF SPEAKERS following order of intervention
Forenkling af instrumenter og procedurer– Debat om rapporten fra Arbejdsgruppe IX, der har Giuliano AMATO som formand (dok. CONV 424/02)
The simplification of instruments and procedures – debate on the report by Group IX chaired by Mr AMATO (CONV 424/02)
Sikkerhed og Retfærdighed– Debat om rapporten fra Gruppe X, der har John Bruton som formand (dok. CONV 426/02)
Security and Justice – debate on the report by Group X chaired by Mr Bruton (CONV 426/02)
Valéry GISCARD d'ESTAING, formand John BRUTON, formand for arbejdsgruppe XParaskevas AVGERINOS - Grækenland (parlamentet) Alfonso DASTIS - Spanien (regeringen) Antonio TAJANI - Europa-Parlamentet Alberto COSTA - Portugal (parlamentet)Pascale ANDREANI - Frankrig (regeringen)Antonio VITORINO - Kommissionen Marietta GIANNAKOU - Grækenland (parlamentet) Diego LOPEZ GARRIDO - Spanien (parlamentet) Gijs de VRIES - Nederlandene (regeringen) Hubert HAENEL - Frankrig (parlamentet) Joschka FISCHER - Tyskland (regeringen) (Blå kort : Speroni, McCormick, Spini) William ABITBOL - Europa-Parlamentet Erwin TEUFEL - Tyskland (parlamentet)Jan KOUHOUT - Den Tjekkiske Rep. (regeringen) Valdo SPINI - Italien (parlamentet) David HEATHCOAT-AMORY - Det Forenede Kongerige (parlamentet) Ben FAYOT - Luxembourg (parlamentet) Andrew DUFF - Europa-Parlamentet Sören LEKBERG - Sverige (parlamentet) Anne VAN LANCKER - Europa-Parlamentet Baroness SCOTLAND of ASTHAL - Det Forenede Kongerige (regeringen) Filadelfio BASILE - Italien (parlamentet) Yasar YAKIS - Tyrkiet (regeringen) Jürgen MEYER - Tyskland (parlamentet) Dick ROCHE - Irland (regeringen) Pervenche BERÈS - Europa-Parlamentet Hannes FARNLEITNER - Østrig (regeringen) Jacques FLOCH - Frankrig (parlamentet) Androula VASSILIOU - Cypern (parlamentet) (Blå kort: Duff, Stuart) Elena PACIOTTI - Europa-Parlamentet Genowefa GRABOWSKA - Polen (parlamentet) Ernâni LOPES - Portugal (regeringen) Antti PELTOMÄKI - Finland (regeringen) Mihael BREJC - Slovenien (parlamentet)
Valéry GISCARD d'ESTAING, Chairman Mr John BRUTON, Chairman of Working Group XMr Paraskevas AVGERINOS - Greece (Parliament) Mr Alfonso DASTIS – Spain (Government) Mr Antonio TAJANI - European Parliament Mr Alberto COSTA - Portugal (Parliament)Ms Pascale ANDREANI - France (Government) Mr Antonio VITORINO - Commission Ms Marietta GIANNAKOU - Greece (Parliament) Mr Diego LOPEZ GARRIDO – Spain (Parliament) Mr Gijs de VRIES – Netherlands (Government) Mr Hubert HAENEL - France (Parliament) Mr Joschka FISCHER – Germany (Government) (Blue cards: Speroni, McCormick, Spini) Mr William ABITBOL - European Parliament Mr Erwin TEUFEL - Germany (Parliament) Mr Jan KOUHOUT – Czech Rep. (Government) Mr Valdo SPINI - Italy (Parliament) Mr David HEATHCOAT-AMORY – United Kingdom (Parliament) Mr Ben FAYOT - Luxembourg (Parliament) Mr Andrew DUFF - European Parliament Mr Sören LEKBERG - Sweden (Parliament) Ms Anne VAN LANCKER - European Parliament Baroness SCOTLAND of ASTHAL - United Kingdom (Government) Mr Filadelfio BASILE – Italy (Parliament) Mr Yasar YAKIS - Turkey (Government) Mr Jürgen MEYER - Germany (Parliament) Mr Dick ROCHE - Ireland (Government) Mme Pervenche BERÈS - European Parliament Mr Hannes FARNLEITNER - Austria (Government) Mr Jacques FLOCH - France (Parliament) Ms Androula VASSILIOU - Cyprus (Parliament) (Blue cards : Duff, Stuart) Ms Elena PACIOTTI - European Parliament Ms Genowefa GRABOWSKA – Poland (Parliament) Mr Ernâni LOPES - Portugal (Government) Mr Antti PELTOMÄKI – Finland (Government) Mr Mihael BREJC - Slovenia (Parliament)
Sammenfattende rapport vedrørende plenarmødet den 20. december 2002 i Bruxelles1
Summary report on the plenary session - Brussels, 20 December 20021
Formandens forelæggelse af arbejdsprogrammet for 2003
Presentation by the President of the work programme for 2003
Formanden, Valéry Giscard D'Estaing, indledte konventets plenarmøde med at udtrykke tilfredshed med resultatet af Det Europæiske Råds møde i København om udvidelsen.
President Giscard D'Estaing opened the plenary session of the Convention by welcoming the outcome of the Copenhagen European Council on enlargement.
Han opfordrede konventet til sammen med ham at lykønske de ti lande, som forhandlingerne nu er afsluttet med.
He invited the Convention to join him in congratulating the ten countries with which negotiations have now been completed.
Formanden mindede om det betydelige arbejde, konventet skal tage fat på fra begyndelsen af 2003, hvis den frist for afslutningen af konventets arbejde, der blev fastsat på Det Europæiske Råds møde i København, skal overholdes.
The President recalled the considerable work which lay ahead of the Convention from the beginning of 2003 if the deadline set by the Copenhagen European Council for the completion of the Convention's work is to be met.
På konventets møde i januar indledes drøftelserne om institutionernes funktionsmåde på grundlag af et dokument, som præsidiet vil udsende.
The January session of the Convention would be devoted to a first discussion on the functioning of the Institutions, based on an issues paper which would be circulated by the Praesidium.
På det første af de to møder i februar drøftes rapporten fra Arbejdsgruppen vedrørende Det Sociale Europa samt eventuelt den regionale dimension.
The first of the two February sessions would discuss the report of the "Social Europe" Working Group, and could also include a discussion on the regional dimension.
Samtidig går præsidiet i gang med forberedelsen af udkast til traktatartikler på baggrund af drøftelserne på plenarmødet og
At the same time, the Praesidium was embarking on the preparation of draft treaty articles, drawing on the discussions in the plenary and on the
rapporterne fra de forskellige arbejdsgrupper.
reports of the various working groups.
Første sæt artikler (Afsnit I, II og III) er allerede under forberedelse og vil være klar til forelæggelse på konventets plenarmøde i januar med henblik på drøftelse i februar.
The first set of articles (Titles I, II and III) were already under preparation, and should be ready to be presented to the Convention at the January plenary, with a view to discussion in February.
Det andet sæt (afsnit V, VII og IX) bliver forelagt i februar, og tredje sæt (afsnit IV, VI, VIII og X) bliver forelagt i marts/april.
The second set (Titles V, VII and IX) would be presented in February, and the third set (Titles IV, VI, VIII and X) would be presented in March/April.
Dette giver konventet et fuldstændigt udkast til første del af traktaten til påske; del III (almindelige og afsluttende bestemmelser) bliver også forelagt i april.
This would allow the Convention to have a complete draft of the first part of the treaty by Easter; Part III (General and Final Provisions) would also be circulated in April.
Samtidig begynder arbejdet med anden del af traktaten.
At the same time, work would begin on the second part of the treaty.
Præsidiet planlægger i slutningen af januar at forelægge konventet en analyse af nuværende traktatartikler og udpege de artikler, der skal erstattes af nye artikler i del II (f.eks. de nuværende FUSP- og RIA-bestemmelser), og de artikler, hvor der blot skal foretages visse tekniske ændringer (for at tage hensyn til de nye bestemmelser i del I).
The Praesidium intended to circulate to the Convention by the end of January an analysis of existing treaty articles, identifying those which would be replaced by new articles in part I of the new treaty, those which would need to be replaced by new articles in part II (e.g. the current CFSP and JHA provisions), and those which would require only some technical amendment (in order to take into account the new provisions in Part I.)
Præsidiet vil udarbejde udkast til de artikler til del II, der kræver gennemgribende ændring.
The Praesidium would prepare those draft articles for part II which required substantial amendment.
For de artikler, der kun kræver tekniske ændringer, er det tanken, at konventets sekretariat skal arbejde sammen med en gruppe af eksperter fra de tre institutioners juridiske tjenester.
For those articles requiring only technical amendment, it envisaged that the Convention secretariat would work with a group of experts drawn from the legal services of the three institutions.
Procedurerne for behandlingen af artikeludkastene afhænger af resultatet af plenardrøftelserne.
The procedures for handling draft articles would depend on the results of the plenary discussions.
Hvis de bliver bredt accepteret på plenarmødet, vil konventsmedlemmerne blive opfordret til efterfølgende skriftligt at forelægge specifikke punkter, som de ønsker taget hensyn til. Hvis der er uenighed om substansen, kan der nedsættes en diskussionsgruppe med et specifikt mandat og en stram tidsfrist.
If they were broadly accepted in plenary, members of the Convention would be invited to submit subsequently in writing any points of detail which they wished to be taken into account.
Præsidiet ønsker at sikre, at alle medlemmer af konventet bliver mest muligt inddraget i den nye og afgørende fase i konventets arbejde, og mener, at disse forslag til arbejdsmetoder vil være den bedste sikring af, at konventet når så bred konsensus som muligt inden sommer.
The Praesidium wanted to ensure that every member of the Convention was as fully involved as possible in the new and decisive phase of the Convention's work, and considered that these proposals on working methods were the best guarantee of the Convention reaching as large a consensus as possible before the summer.
EU's optræden udadtil – Debat om rapporten fra Gruppe VII, der har Jean-Luc Dehaene som formand (CONV 459/02) i)
External Action – Debate on the report by Working Group VII chaired by Mr Dehaene (CONV 459/02) i.
Forelæggelse af rapporten ved Jean-Luc Dehaene
Presentation of the report by Mr Dehaene
Han påpegede, at gruppens udgangspunkt havde været et fælles ønske om at sikre større sammenhæng og effektivitet i EU's optræden udadtil, og skitserede nogle af de vigtigste anbefalinger.
He pointed to the fact that the starting point of the work of the Group had been a common desire to ensure greater coherence and efficiency in EU external action and outlined some of the main recommendations.
Gruppen foreslår, at principperne og målene for EU's optræden udadtil defineres i traktaten (der er blevet udarbejdet en tekst herom), og at Det Europæiske Råd omsætter dem til specifikke strategiske mål.
The Group proposed that the principles and objectives of EU external action be defined in the Treaty (a text to this effect had been prepared), and that these be translated into specific strategic objectives by the European Council.
I forbindelse med kompetence foreslås, at traktaten udtrykkeligt fastslår EU's kompetence til at indgå eksterne aftaler, der omhandler spørgsmål, der hører ind under EU's interne kompetence.
In relation to competences, it was suggested that the Treaty make explicit the competence of the Union to conclude external agreements covering issues falling under its internal competence.
Gruppen har undersøgt, hvordan arrangementer inden for og mellem institutionerne kan styrkes for at øge sammenhængen og effektiviteten i EU's optræden udadtil.
The Group had explored ways in which the arrangements within and between institutions could be strengthened to increase coherence and efficiency of external action.