natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolenklargjorde i sagen Tyskland mod Kommissionen (dom af 19.9.2000,sag C-156198, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser) anvendelsesomrädetfor den undtagelse,der er fastsat i traktatensartikel92, stk. 2, litra c) (efterrendringnu artikel 87, stk. 2, litra c), EF).
I7 The Commission complainedin particular that France hadfailed to publish prior information notices and had expressly set forth as an awardcriterion in a number of contract notices a condition relating to employment,linked to a local project to combatunemployment.
Foreneligemed frellesmarkedet erifolge denne bestemmelse stotteforanstaltninger for skonomien i visse af Forbundsrepublikken Tysklands omräder, som er pävirket af Tysklands deling,i det omfang de er nsdvendige for at opveje de skonomiske ulemper, somdennedeling har forärsaget.
Rejectingthe first complaint, the Court held that the publication of a prior information notice is compulsoryonly where the contracting authorities exercise their option to reduce the timelimits for the receipt of tenders.
Domstolen fastslog, at da det drejedesig om enundtagelse fra det almindelige princip i traktaten om, at statsststte er uforeneligmed frellesmarkedet, skulle bestemmelsen undergives en sn & ver fortolkning.Bestemmelsens anvendelse pä de nye delstater efter Tysklands forening, kankun foregä pä de samme betingelser som dem, der var greldende i de gamledelstater i perioden forud for genforeningstidspunktet.
As regards the second complaint, the Court, referring to the judgment in Case 31187 Beentjes U9881 ECR 4635,pointed outthat, under Directive 93137,the criteria on which the contracting authorities are to basethe award of contracts are either the lowestprice only or, when the awardis made to the most economically advantageous tender, various criteria dependingon the contract, such as price, period for completion,running costs, profitability,technical merit.
Ordene Tysklands delinghenviser historisk set til etableringen af skillelinjen mellem de tobesattelseszoner i 1948.Derfor kan de skonomiske ulemper, som denne delinghar forärsaget,kun omfatte de skonomiske ulemper, der i visse tyske regionerblev forärsaget som en folge af den isolering, der fulgte med etableringen afdenne fysiske gr & nse, som eksempelvis afbrydelsen af samfrerdselsärerne ellertabafnaturligeafsetningsmulighederefterforstyrrelseriforretningsforbindelserne mellem de to tyske omräder.
None the less, Article 30 of that directive does not preclude allpossibility for the contracting authorities to use as a criterion a condition linkedto the combatting of unemploymentprovided that the condition is consistent withall the fundamental principles of Community law, in particular the principle ofnon-discrimination flowing from the provisions of the Treaty on the right ofestablishment and the freedom to provide services.
Derimod tager denopfattelse, hvorefter artikel 92, stk. 2, litra c), gar det muligt helt at opvejeden langsomme skonomiske udvikling, som det er ubestridt,at de nye delstaterlider under, hverken hensyn til, at der er tale om en undtagelsesbestemmelse,eller til den sammenh & trg,som bestemmelsen indgär i, og de formäl, som denforfolger.
In addition, such a criterionmust be applied in conformity with all the procedural rules laid down in Directive93137, in particular the rules on advertising.
De skonomiske ulemper, som de nye delstater generelt lider under,er ikke direkte forärsaget af den geografiskedeling af Tyskland i traktatensartikel 92, stk. 2, litra c)'s forstand.
It follows that an award criterionlinked to the combatting of unemploymentmust be expressly mentioned in thecontract notice so that contractorsmay become aware of its existence.
Udviklingsforskellenemellem de gamleog de nye delstater beror pä andre forhold end den geografiskeskillelinje, derfolger af Tysklands deling, og skyldes navnlig de forskellige politiskskonomiske systemer, der blev etableret i de to stater pä hver sin side afgraensen.
Since the Commission criticised only the reference to such a criterion as an award criterionin the contract notice, and did not claim that the criterion was inconsistent withthe fundamental principles of Community law, in particular the principle of nondiscrimination, or that it had not been advertised in the contract notice, the Court also rejected the secondcomplaint. complaint.
Domstolen begrrenser sig tilinden for rammerne af denne rapport at nrevnede sager, der vedrsrer pligt tilbetaling af mervrerdiafgift og betaling opkrevet for benyttelseaf veje og broer.
Council Directive 711305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the coordination of proceduresfor the award of public works contracts (OJ, English Special Edition 1971(ID, p. 682), as amended by Directive 89l440lEEC.
Blandt disse sager findes et traktatbrudssogsmäI, Kommissionen havde anlagtmod fem medlemsstater, idet disse ikke havde opkrevet mervrerdiafgift af denbetaling, der blev opkrevet for benyttelseaf veje og broer.
joint municipal groupingsfor the award of contracts for electrification and streettighting work, the French Republic had failed to fulfiI its obligations under Directive 93l38lEEC.
I domme af 12.september2000 (sag C-267197,Kommissionen mod Frankrig, sag C-358197,Kommissionen mod lrland, sag C-359197,Kommissionen mod Det Forenede
18 The Commission took the view that the contestedcontracts were lots of a single"work", which originatedwith a single contractingentity, and that the rules of the directive should have been applied to all of them,not merely to the six main lots.
Afgorelser) fastslog Domstolen, at tilrädighedsstillelse af veje og broer modbetaling af en afgift udgor en tjenesteydelseudfsrt mod betaling somomhandlet i direktiv 771388lEgF 15.
The Court stated that it was clear from thedefinition of "work" in Directive 93138 that the existence of a work had to beassessed in the light of the economic and technicalfunction of the result of theworks concerned.
Säledes er benyttelsenaf vejanleggetbetinget af betaling af en vejafgift, som bl.a. er fastsat pä grundlag af detbenyttede koretoj og den tilbagelagte strrekning.
So far as concerns artificial splitting of the work intoelectrification works and street lighting works, the Court found that an electricitysuppty network and a street lighting network had a different economic andtechnical function.
Der bestär säledes en direkteog nodvendig sammenhreng mellem den leverede tjenesteydelseog denmodtagne modvrerdi erlagt i penge. Medlemsstaterne giorde til deres forsvar greldende, at de erhvervsdrivende, der drev disse anlreg, var offentligretligeorganer, og ikke skulle anses som afgiftspligtige personer for sä vidt angär virksomhed eller transaktioner,som de udsvedei deres egenskab af offentligmyndighed.
Accordingly, works on those networks could not beconsidered to constitute lots of a single work artificially split contrary to Directive93138.
Domstolen understregede, at for at reglen om afgiftsfritagelsefinder anvendelse pä de offentligretlige organers merverdiafgift af denvirksomhed eller de handlinger,de udfsrer i egenskab af offentlig myndighed,skal to kumulative betingelser v€ere opfyldt, nemlig et offentligretligt organsudsvelse af virksomhed og udovelse af virksomhed, der varetages i egenskabaf offentlig myndighed.
As regards artificial splitting of the electrification work ona geographicalbasis, the Court found that the networks were interconnectableand, taken as a whole, they fulfilled one economic and technicalfunction, whichconsisted in the supply and sale of electricity to consumers in the döpartementconcerned.
Hvad angär den sidste betingelse bestär virksomhed,der udsves i egenskab af offentlig myndighed, i sädan virksomhed, somvaretages af offentligretlige organer pä grundlag af deres srerlige retlige status,hvilket dog ikke omfatter den virksomhed, som de udwer pä samme retligevilkär som private erhvervsdrivende. Men i Frankrig, Irland og Det ForenedeKongerige udsves den virksomhed, der bestär i at stille vejanleg til rädighedfor brugerne mod betaling af en vejafgift - i hvert fald i visse tilfrelde - ikkeaf et offentligrettigt organ, men af private erhvervsdrivende.
Moreover, in the case in point, there were important factors whichmilitated in favour of those contracts being aggregatedat that level, such as thefact that the invitations for tenders for the contested contracts were made at thesame time. the similarities between the contract notices and the fact that the bodycomprising the joint municipal groupings responsible for electrification within thedöpartement \nitiated and coordinatedthe contracts within a single geographicalarea.
När dette ertilfreldet, kan den päberäbte afgiftsfritagelse ikke finde anvendelse.
Accordingly, the Court upheld the complaint that the work was artificiallysplit on a geographical basis.
Derforfastslog Domstolen, at de tre nrevnte medlemsstater havde tilsidesat deresforpligtelser.
The Court also found the failure to fulfilobligations proven in that the value of all but one of the contracts forelectrification exceeded the thresholds established by Directive 93138 forapplication of the directive and, by artificially splitting the works at issue, the French Republic infringed the provisions of the directive concerningthresholds. thresholds.
Derimod udfsres den virksomhed, der bestär i at stille vejanhgtil rädighed for brugerne mod betaling af en vejafgift i Grrekenland og Nederlandene, af et offentligretligt organ, og Komrnissionenhavde ikke
Asked in Case C-324198 Telaustria and Telefonadress fiudgment of 7 December2000) to give a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the same directive, the Court held that public service concession contracts are not included
Rädets sjette 77l388lEgF af I7.5.1977 om harmonisering af medlemsstaterneslovgivning om omsaetningsafgifter- Det frelles merveerdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag (EFT L 145,s. 1).
Council Directive 93l38lEEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement proceduresof entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ
Pä omrädet for offentlige kontrakter har flere domme giort det muligt for Domstolen at fortsrette arbejdet med fortolkningenaf frellesskabsdirektiverne om udbud af offentlige kontrakter, hvadenten det sketei forbindelse med de prejudicielle sp,,)i{sffiäl, Domstolen blev forelagt, elleri forbindelse med de af Kommissrc,qenmod visse medlemsstater anlagtetraktatbrudssogsmäl.
As regards proceedings concerning intellectual property, apart from Case C-23199 Commission v France which has already been referred to 1e onlythe judgment of 7 November 2000 in Case C-312198 WarsteinerBrauerei will bementioned, concerning Regulation (EEC) No 2081192 on the protection ofgeographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products andfoodstuffs. 20
I den fsrste sag Kommissionen mod Frankrig (dom af 26.9.2000, sag C-225198, endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgarelser) havde Kommissionen anlagtsag ved Domstolen med henblik pä at fä fastsläet, at Den Franske Republik iforbindelse med forskellige udbudsprocedurer vedrsrende tildelingen afoffentlige bygge- og anlregskontrakter for opforelse og vedligeholdelseaf af skolebygninger havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EF-traktatens tu
Simple geographical indications of source,in the case ofwhich there is no link between the characteristics of the product and itsgeographical provenance, do not fall within that definition of geographicalindicationsand are not therefore protected under Regulation No 2081192.However, such geographical indications may be protected under nationallegislation which prohibits the potentially misleading use of an indication ofsource in the case of which there is no link between the characteristics of theproduct and its geographicalprovenance. provenance.
myndigheder kan benytte en betingelse om bekampelseaf arbejdsloshed somet kriterium under forudsretning af, at denne betingelse er i overensstemmelsemed alle de grundlreggende principper i frellesskabsretten, herunder navnligprincippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling, som det folger af traktatensbestemmelserom etableringsretten og den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser.Dette kriterium skal anvendes under overholdelse af alle direktivetsprocedureregler, bl.a. de regler om offentliggorelse, som det indeholder.
fiudgment of 3 October 2000). A union of doctors in the public health servicein a Spanish region contended before the national court that doctors in primary care teams at health centreswere required to work without the duration of theirwork being subject to any daily, weekly, monthly or annual limits.
Detfolger heraf, at et tildelingskriterium,der er forbundet med bekempelse afarbejdsloshed, skal vere udtrykkeligt naevnti udbudsbekendtgorelsen, for atentreprensrerne skal kunne skaffe sig kendskab til, at der stilles en sädanbetingelse.
In theabsence of express national implementing measures, the union sought theapplication to those doctors of several provisions of Directive 93ll04lBc concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time.
Henset til, at Kommissionen alene gjorde indsigelse over for, at etsädant kriterium blev nrevnt som et tildelingskriterium i udbudsbekendtgorelsenuden at haevde,at dette kriterium var uforeneligt med faellesskabsrettensgrundlreggende principper, navnlig princippet om forbud modforskelsbehandling, eller at det ikke var blevet offentliggjort iudbudsbekendtgorelsen, forkastede Domstolenligeledes detteandetklagepunkt. andetklagepunkt.
21 The Court of Justice found that the activity of doctors in primary health care teams falls withinthe scope of Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourageimprovements in the safety and health of workers at work (the basic directive)and, in particular, of Directive 931104.
I den anden sag Kommissionen mod Frankrig (dom af 5.10.2000, sag C-I6198,endnu ikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser) havde Kommissionen anlagt sag ved
Their activity does not fall within thespecific public service activities intended to uphold public order and security,essential for the proper functioning of society,which, because of their particularcharacteristics, are excluded from the scope of thosedirectives.
Domstolen med henblik pä at fä fastsläet, at Den Franske Republik havdetilsidesatsine forpligtelser i henhold til direktiv 93l38lBgF 18 i forbindelsemed den udbudsprocedure, der blev anvendt af et foretagende, der bestod afforskellige felleskommunale safilmenslutninger, ved tildeling af kontrakter päelforsynings- og vejbelysningsarbejder.
Time spent oncall by doctors in primary health care teams must be regarded in its entirety asworking time, and where appropriate as overtime, within the meaning of Directive 93ll}4 if the doctors are required to be present at the health centre.The characteristic features of working time are present in the case of time spenton call by the doctors where their presenceat the health centre is required, thatis to say they are working, at the employer's disposal and carrying out theirduties: the fact that they are obliged to be present and available at the workplacewith a view to providing their professional services means that they are carryingout their duties in that instance.
Kommissionen fandt, at de omtvistedekontrakter var dele af 6t enkelt arbejde, som kun 6n ordregiver havde tagetinitiativ til, og som i deres helhed burde have vreret udbudt i henhold tilreglerne i direktivet og ikke kun de seks vresentligste af dem.
To exclude duty on call from working timewhere physical presenceis required would seriously undermine the objectivepursued by the directive, which is to ensure the safety and health of workers bygranting them minimum periods of rest and adequatebreaks.
Domstolenfastslog, at det fremgär af direktivets definitionen af et arbejde, at afgorelsenaf, om der er tale om et arbejde, skal ske i forhold til den skonomiske ogtekniske funktion, som resultatet af de pägreldende arbejderopfflder.
In that situation they may managetheir timewith fewer constraintsand pursue their own interests; accordingly, only timelinked to the actual provision of primary care services must be regarded asworking time.
For sävidt angär den kunstige opdeling af arbejdet pä elnettet, henholdsvisvejbelysningsnettet fastslog Domstolen, at et elnetog et vejbelysningsnet ikkehar samme skonomiske og tekniskefunktion, hvorfor arbejdernepä disse netikke kan anses for at v & re delarbejderaf 6t enkelt arbejde, som er blevetkunstigt opdelt i strid med direktiv 93/38.
Next, the Court found that work performed by doctors in primaryhealth care teams whilst on call constitutes shift work within the meaning of Directive 931104:they are assigned successively to the same work posts on arotational basis, which makesit necessary for them to perform work at differenthours over a given period of days or weeks.
Hertil kommer, at den i direktivet indeholdte definition af begrebet 6t arbejde ikke er betinget af forhold som
The Court then held that, in theabsence of national implementing provisions, Directive 931L04 confers onindividuals a right whereby the reference period for the implementation of themaximum duration of their weekly working time must not exceed 12 months.
Med hensyn til den kunstige geografiskeopdeling af elforsyningsarbejdet fastslog Domstolen, at elnettene kunneforbindes indbyrdes, og som helhed opfyldte den samme skonomiske ogtekniske funktion, der bestod i at transportereog srelge den producerede ogleverede elektricitet til forbrugerne i det pägreldende departement.
Finally, the individual consent of the workers concerned is necessary in order fora Member State to be able to exercise its power under Directive 931104 toderogate from the provisions concerning the maximum weekly working time.Such individual consent cannot be replacedby a collective agreement.
Domstolen fastslog endvidere, at der forelä ettraktatbrud, i det omfang vrerdien af samtlige elforsyningskontrakter medundtagelse af 6n oversteg de i direktiv 93138 fastsattetrerskelverdier fordirektivets anvendelse, og at Den Franske Republik ved at foretage en kunstigopdeling af kontrakten vedrsrende de omtvistede arbejder ogsä havde tilsidesatdirektivets bestemmelser om trerskelverdier.
21.2. ln Collino and Mayeur the Court confirmed that Directive 77ll87_BAR_EECon the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to thesafeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings,businesses or parts of businesses '2 applies in two entirely contrasting situations:first, the transfer of an undertaking managed by a public body to a private-lawcompany and, second, the transfer of an activity carried out by a private-lawassociation to a legal person governed by public law.
Selv om koncessionskontrakter om offentlige tjenesteydelser päfrllesskabsrettensnuv & rendeudviklingstrinerudelukketfraanvendelsesomrädet for direktiv 93138,er de ordregivende myndigheder, derindgär aftalerne, forpligtet til at overholde traktatens grundlreggende regler ialmindelighed og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling pä grundlagaf nationalitet i srerdeleshed.
In Case C-I75199 Mayeur (udgment of 26 September 2000), the Court held that Directive 771187 applies where a municipality, a legal person governed by publiclaw operating within the framework of specific rules of administrative law, takesover activities relating to publicity and information concerning the services whichit offers to the public, where such activities were previously carried out, in theinterests of that municipatity, by a non-profit-making association which was alegal person governed by private law, provided that the transferredentity retainsits identity.
Imidlertid kan sädanne geografiske oprindelsesbetegnelser v & rebeskyttet i medfsr af en national lovgivning, der forbyder brug, med risiko forvildledning, af en geografisk betegnelse,ved hvilken der ikke er nogensammenhreng mellem produktetskendetegn og dets geografiske oprindelse.
As regards equal pay, the cases to be noted are JämstäIldhetsombudsmannen, concerning equal salaries, and Deutsche Telekom and Preston and Fletcher,concerning the exclusion of part-time workers from occupational pensionschemes.
2L Inden for social- og arbejdsnwkedspolitikken har Domstolen i lsbetaf det forlsbne är afsagt flere vigtige domme vedrsrende beskyttelse afarbejdstagernes sikkerhed og sundhed, opretholdelse af arbejdstagernesrettigheder i tilfrelde af virksomhedsoverdragelseog princippet omligebehandling af maend og kvinder.
In Case C-236198 Jömställdhetsombudsmannen (udgment of 30 March 2000), the Court replied in the negative to the question whether an inconvenient-hourssupplement paid to midwives was to be taken into account in calculating the salaryserving as the basis for a pay comparison for the purposes of Article 119 of the Treaty (Articles II7 to I20 of the Treaty have been replacedby Articles 136 ECto L43 EC) and Directive 75lIl7lEEC, 23 which concerns equal pay.
21.1.Det centralei Simap-sagen(domaf 3.10.2000,sag C-303198,endnuikke trykt i Samling af Afgorelser) var beskyttelsen af arbejdstagernessikkerhed og sundhed.
Thatsupplement varied from month to month according to the part of the day duringwhich the hours were worked, a fact which made it difficult to make acomparison between, on the one hand, a midwife's salary and supplement, takentogether, and, on the other hand, the basic salary of the comparator group(clinical technicians).
En fagforening for offentligt ansatte lreger i en spanskregion gjorde for den nationale ret greldende, at de leger, der gjorde tjenestei de primrere behandlingsenheder, var forpligtede til at arbejde udentidsbegrrensning, og uden at arbejdets varighed var underlagt en begrensningpr. dag,uge, mänedeller är.
The Court stated that if a difference in pay between the twogroups compared was found to exist, and if the available statistical data indicatedthat there was a substantially higher proportion of women than men in thedisadvantaged group, Article 119 of the Treaty required the employer to justifythe difference by objective factors unrelated to any discrimination on grounds ofsex.
Denne fagforening pästod, at flere bestemmelseri direktiv 93lL}4_BAR_EF om visse aspekter i forbindelse med tilrettelreggelse afarbejdstiden fandt anvendelse pä de nrevnte lreger, idet der ikke fandtesudtrykkelige gennemforelsesbestemmelser i national ret 2t.
The Court also held that neither the reduction in working time, by referenceto the standard working time for day-work of clinical technicians,awarded inrespect of work performed by midwives according to a three-shiftroster, nor thevalue of such a reduction, were to be taken into consideration when calculatingthe salary used as the basis for a comparison of the two groups' pay for thepurposesof Article 119 of the Treaty and Directive 75lLl7.
Domstolenfastslog, at det arbejde, der blev udfsrt af lagerne i de primrerebehandlingsenheder, var omfattet af anvendelsesomrädet for direktiv 891391ßAF om ivrerksrettelse af foranstaltninger til forbedring afarbejdstagernes sikkerhed og sundhed under arbejdet og navnlig af direktiv
However, such areduction could constitute an objective reason unrelated to any discrimination ongrounds of sex such as to justify a difference in pay.
Rädets direktiv 93ll04lEF af 23.1I.1993 om visse aspekter i forbindelse medtilrettelaggelse af arbejdstiden (EFT L 307, s. 18).
Council Directive T5lLlT_BAR_EEC of 10 February 1975onthe approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the application of the principle of equal pay for men andwomen (OI 1975 L 45, p. 19).
Den tid, hvorunder hgerne i de primerebehandlingsenheder havde vagt efter ordningen med fysisk tilstedeverelse isundhedsinstitutionen, skulle fuldt ud betragtes som arbejde og efteromstrendighederne som overarbejde i direktiv 931I04's forstand.
In the event of such discrimination, thepossibility of relying on the direct effect of Article 119 of the Treaty is subjectto a limitation in time whereby periods of service of the workers are to be takeninto account only from 8 April 1976, the date of the judgment in Case 43175