6 ฀ % & 4 ฀ , ฀ ฀ AF฀ 7 ฀ % & 4 ฀ # ฀ ฀ AF฀ ฀ S E N EffS T E ฀ U D G A VE ฀ AF฀ PROTOKOL L E NffS ฀ TEKST ฀ 6 E D R ฀ DEN฀ O P R IN D E LIGE฀ U D G A VE ฀ S E ฀ & ฀ 0 O C A R ฀ , A ฀ C O N VE N Z I O N E ฀ DE฀"RUXELLES฀SULLA฀GIURISDIZIONE฀E฀ L EffS E C U Z I O N E ฀ D E L L E ฀ S E N T E N Z E ฀ "RUXELLES KONVENTIONEN฀ OM฀RETTERNES฀KOMPETENCE฀OG฀OM฀ FULDBYRDELSE฀AF฀RETS A FG � R E L S ER฀ ฀ U D G A VE ฀ - I LA N O ฀ ฀ S ฀ ฀ F F 8 ฀ 6 ( ฀ 'AUDEMET 4 A L L O N ฀ ฀ KONVENTIONEN฀ BLEV฀ EFT E R FULGT฀ AF฀ EN฀ PROTOKOL฀ DER฀ BLEV฀ U N D E R T E G NET฀ I฀,UXEMBOURG฀ DEN฀ ฀ J U N I฀ ฀ OG฀ T R � D T E ฀ I฀ KRAFT฀ DEN฀ ฀ SEPTEMBER฀ ฀ ฀ HVORVED฀$OMSTOLEN฀BLEV฀TILLAGT฀KOMPETENCE฀TIL฀AT฀FORTOLKE฀KONVENTIONEN฀ EFTER฀ ANMODNING฀ FRA฀ NATIONALE฀ A P P E L RETTER฀ ELLER฀ RETTER฀ I฀ H � J EffS T E ฀ IN SffT AN S ฀ 0 R O TOKOLLEN฀HAR฀GIVET฀ANLEDNING฀TIL฀EN฀RIGHOLDIG฀RETSPRAKSIS฀I฀DE฀SENESTE฀TREDIVE฀ � R ฀ OG฀ HAR฀ S K A B T ฀ EN฀ ENSARTET฀ FORTOLKNING฀ AF฀ KONVENTIONENS฀ BESTEMMELSER฀ IDET฀ DER฀ ER฀BLEVET฀ FASTLAGT฀ SELV SffT� N DIGE฀ JURIDISKE฀ BE G R EB ER฀ OG฀ SKET฀ EN฀ BE G R � NffS NING฀ AF฀ DE฀ KONTRAHERENDE฀ STATERS฀ RET T E R S ฀ ANVENDELSE฀ AF฀NATIONAL฀ LOVGIVNING฀ $OMSTOLENS฀ FOR T O L K NING S A R BE J DE฀ HAR฀ MED฀ � R ENE฀ T I L F � R T ฀ KONVENTIONENS฀ REGLER฀ EN฀ H � J ฀ G R A D ฀ AF฀ J U R I D I S K ฀ S IKKE R HED฀ S � L E D EffS ฀ AT฀ KONVENTIONEN฀ ER฀BLEVET฀ ET฀ M E G ET฀ P� L I D E L I GT ฀ R E D S K A B ฀ FOR฀DE฀ JURIDISKE฀ B R U GERE฀ & OR฀ DEN฀ PARALLELLE฀ ,UGANO KONVENTION฀ VAR฀ DET฀ DERIMOD฀ IKKE ฀MULIG T ฀ AT฀ F A SffT L � G GE ฀ EN฀ P R O C E D U R E ฀ FOR฀ ENSARTET฀ FORTOLKNING฀ MEN฀ DE฀ NATIONALE฀ RETTER฀ O G S � ฀ RETTERNE฀ I฀ LA N D ENE฀ UDEN฀ FOR฀ % & ฀ HAR฀ DOG฀ OFT E ฀ BASERET฀ SIG฀ P� ฀ $OMSTOLENS฀ RETSPRAKSIS฀ OG฀ HERMED฀ SIKRET฀ VELAFBALANCEREDE฀ L �ffS NING ER฀ I฀ DE฀ INVOLVEREDE฀ STATER฀ & OR฀ S � ฀ VIDT฀ AN G � R ฀ "RUXELLES฀) FORORDNINGEN฀ lNDER฀ PROTOKOLLEN฀IKKE฀ANVEN DELSE฀ $EN฀ ENSARTEDE฀ FORTOLKNING฀ AF฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ F � LG ER฀DE฀ S � D V AN LIGE฀ P R O C E D U R ER฀ HVOREFTER฀ DET฀ ER฀ FOR BE H O L D T ฀ $OMSTOLEN฀ AT฀ FOR T O L K E ฀ % & RETTEN฀ J F ฀ % & TRAKTATENS฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ - E D ฀ EN฀ BE SffT E M M E L S E ฀ HVIS฀ H E NffS I GT SffM �ffS S IG HED฀ ER฀ T V I VfiL SOM฀ BE G R � NffS ER฀ % & TRAKTATENS฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ IMIDLERTID฀ ADGANGEN฀ TIL฀AT฀ FORE L � G GE ฀ $OMSTOLEN฀ ET฀ FOR T O L K NING S S P� R G SffM � L ฀ S � ฀ DEN฀ KUN฀ T I L K OM MER฀ DE฀ NATIONALE฀ RETTER฀ HVIS฀ A FG � R E L S ER฀ I F � L GE ฀ DE฀ NATIONALE฀ RETS REGLER฀ IKKE฀ K AN ฀APPEL L E R EffS ฀ ฀ ) ฀ H VE R T ฀ F A L D ฀ B � R ฀ M AN ฀ H U SKE฀ AT฀ FOR฀ S � ฀ VIDT฀ AN G � R ฀ DE฀ BESTEMMELSER฀ I฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ DER฀ BLOT฀ REPRODUCERER฀ REGLER฀ FRA฀ "RUXELLES฀) KONVENTIONEN฀ ER฀ $OMSTOLENS฀ FORTOLKNING฀ P� ฀ GRUNDLAG฀ AF฀ PROTOKOL LEN฀ FORTSAT฀ G YL D IG ฀ OG฀ DENNE฀ FORTOLKNING฀ SKAL฀ STADIG฀ F � L GE S # OM P� T E N C E ฀ ET฀ E X � C U T I O N ฀ D EffS ฀ J U GE M E N TffS ฀ EN฀ %ffU R O P E ฀ 2 E T T E R N EffS ฀ KOMPETENCE฀OG฀FULDBYRDELSE฀AF฀ RETS A FG � R E L S ER฀ I฀ %UROPA ฀ ฀ U D G A VE ฀ 0AR I S ฀ ฀ S ฀ � ฀ 3 ฀ " A R I A T T I฀ w , A ฀ COOPERAZIONE฀GIUDIZIARIA฀IN฀MATERIA฀ CIVILE฀ D A L ฀ T E R Z O ฀ P I LA SffT R O ฀ D E L L 5 N I O N E ฀ EUROPEO฀AL฀TITOLO฀)6฀DEL฀4RATTATO฀ # % i฀ %5 S ฀ CIVILRETLIGE฀ SAMARBEJDE฀ UNDER฀ T R E D J E ฀ S � J L E ฀ I฀ MED F � R ฀ AF฀ % & TRAKTATENS฀AFSNIT฀)6 ฀I฀$IRITTO฀ D E L L 5 N I O N E ฀ E U R O P E A ฀ ฀ S ฀ � ฀ & ฀ 0 O C A R ฀ w 2 E M A R Q U EffS ฀ SffU R ฀ LA ฀ C O O P� R A T I O N ฀ J U D I C I A I R E ฀ EN฀ M A T I� R E ฀ CIVILE฀ D AN S ฀ LA ฀ # % i฀ " E M � R K NING ER฀ VE D R � RENDE฀ DET฀ CIVILRETLIGE฀ SAMARBEJDE฀I฀% & ฀ I฀ -� LA N GE S ฀ EN฀ L H O N N E U R ฀ DE฀ " ฀ $ U T O I T ฀ ' E N � VE ฀ ฀ S ฀ ฀ $EN฀ BE T Y D NING฀ ET฀ F � L L EffS S K A B S IN SffT R U M E N T ฀ SOM฀ "RUXELLES฀) FORORDNINGEN฀HAR฀ FOR฀ GE N N E MF� R E L S EN฀ AF฀ EN฀ FU L D ฀ OG฀ G N I D NING S L �ffS ฀ F R I฀ B EV � GE L IG HED฀ FOR฀ P E R SffO N ER฀ V A R ER฀ T J E N EffS T E Y D E L S ER฀ OG฀ K A P I T A L ฀ INDEN฀ FOR฀ %5 ฀ KAN฀ IKKE฀ U N D E R V U R DERES฀ ) K K E ฀ BLOT฀ BLEV฀ ET฀ S � D AN T ฀ IN SffT R U M E N T ฀ BE BU DET฀ ALLEREDE฀ VED฀ IN D G � E L S EN฀ AF฀ TRAKTATEN฀ OM฀ O P RET T E L S EN฀ AF฀$ET฀ %ffU R O P� I SKE฀ � KON OM I SKE฀ & � L L EffS S K A B ฀ DER฀ I฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ N � V N T E ฀ B EV � GE L IG HED฀ FOR฀ RETS A FG � R E L S ER฀ B LA N D T ฀ DE฀ E M N ER฀DER฀ SKULLE฀ OM F A T T EffS ฀ AF฀ EN฀ KONVENTION฀ MELLEM฀ MEDLEMSSTATERNE฀ MEN฀ F R E M ฀ FOR฀ A L T ฀ V I S ER฀ FOR L � B ET฀ OM K RING฀ "RUXELLES KONVENTIONEN฀ DEN฀ SffU C C EffS ฀ KONVENTIONEN฀ HAR฀ HAFT฀ SIDEN฀ SIN฀ I K R A FT T R � DEN฀ OG฀ DEN฀ OM F A T T E N DE฀ RETSPRAKSIS฀ DER฀ HAR฀ U D V I K LET฀ SIG฀ OM K RING฀ 23a4225a3;27avguvqaFC
฀ 4HE฀ ฀ "RUSSELS฀#ONVENTION฀WAS฀ FOLLOWED฀BY฀ A฀ PROTOCOL฀ WHICH฀WAS฀ S I G N E D ฀ IN฀ ,UXEMBOURG฀ ON฀ ฀ *U N E ฀ ฀ AND฀ ENTERED฀ INTO฀ FOR C E ฀ ON฀ ฀ 3 EP T EM BER฀ ฀ ฀ GIVING฀ THE฀ #OURT฀ OF฀ *USTICE฀ JURISDICTION฀ TO฀ INTERPRET฀ THE฀ CONVENTION฀ IF฀ SO฀ REQUESTED฀ BY฀NATIONAL฀ COURTS฀ OF฀ APPEAL฀ OR฀ LAST฀ RESORT฀ 4HE฀ PROTOCOL฀ HAS฀ GIVEN฀ RISE฀ TO฀ A฀ WEALTH฀ OF฀ CASE LAW฀ OVER฀ THE฀ LAST฀ ฀ Y E A R S ฀ WHICH฀ BY฀ ADOPTING฀ INDEPENDENT฀ LEGAL฀ CON C EP T S ฀ AND฀ L I M I TING฀ RE L I ANCE฀ ON฀ NATIONAL฀ LAW฀ BY฀ THE฀ CONTRACTING฀ 3TATES฀ COURTS฀ HAS฀ MADE฀ FOR฀ UNIFORM฀ INTERPRETATION฀ OF฀ THE฀ PROVISIONS฀ OF฀ THE฀ CONVENTION฀ / V E R ฀ THE฀ Y E A R S ฀ THE฀ # O U R T S ฀ RULINGS฀HAVE฀ENSURED฀THAT฀THE฀PROVISIONS฀OF฀THE฀CONVENTION฀CARRY฀A฀HIGH฀ DEGREE฀ OF฀ LEGAL฀ C E R T A IN T Y ฀ M AK ING฀ IT฀ A฀ VERY฀ RELIABLE฀ INSTRUMENT฀ FOR฀ LEGAL฀ P R A C T I T I O N E R S ฀ )T฀ WAS฀ NOT฀ POSSIBLE฀ H O W E V E R ฀ TO฀ A T T A C H ฀ TO฀ THE฀ , U G A NO฀ #ONVENTION฀ A฀ PROCEDURE฀ FOR฀ ENSURING฀ UNIFORM฀ INTERPRETATION�฀ N E V E R T H E LESS฀ NATIONAL฀ COURTS฀ IN฀ NON %#฀ COUNTRIES฀ HAVE฀ FREQUENTLY฀ BEEN฀ GUIDED฀ BY฀ #OURT฀ OF฀ *USTICE฀ CASE LAW฀ WHICH฀ HAS฀ MADE฀ FOR฀ HARMONIOUS฀ SOLUTIONS฀ AMONG฀ THE฀ 3TATES฀ CONCERNED฀ 4HE฀ ฀ PROTOCOL฀ DOES฀ NOT฀ APPLY฀ TO฀ THE฀"RUSSELS฀ )฀2EGULATION฀ 4HE฀ T A S K ฀ OF฀ ENSURING฀ UNIFORM฀ INTERPRETATION฀ OF฀ THE฀ REGULATION฀FALLS฀TO฀THE฀#OURT฀OF฀*USTICE฀UNDER฀THE฀ORDINARY฀PROCEDURES฀FOR฀ INTERPRETING฀ #OMMUNITY฀ LAW฀ LAID฀DOWN฀IN฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀OF฀THE฀ %#฀ 4 RE A T Y ฀ ( O W E V E R ฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀OF฀THE฀ %#฀ 4 RE A T Y ฀ INTRODUCES฀ A฀ Q U E S T I O N ABLE฀ PROVISION฀ WHEREBY฀ONLY฀THOSE฀COURTS฀AND฀TRIBUNALS฀IN฀A฀-EMBER฀3TATE฀AGAINST฀WHOSE฀ D E C I SIONS฀ THERE฀ IS฀ NO฀ JUDICIAL฀ R EM E D Y ฀ UNDER฀ NATIONAL฀ LAW฀ MAY฀ IN฀ FACT฀ S U B M IT฀ QUESTIONS฀ OF฀ INTERPRETATION฀ TO฀ THE฀ #OURT฀ OF฀ *USTICE฀ ฀ )N฀ ANY฀ EVENT฀ IT฀ SHOULD฀BE฀REMEMBERED฀THAT฀THE฀#OURT฀OF฀*USTICE฀HAS฀ALREADY฀PROVIDED฀IN T E R P RE T A T I O N S ฀ ON฀ THE฀ B A S IS฀ OF฀ THE฀ ฀ PROTOCOL฀ FOR฀ THOSE฀ PROVISIONS฀ OF฀ THE฀ REGULATION฀WHICH฀SIMPLY฀REPRODUCE฀THE฀PROVISIONS฀OF฀THE฀"RUSSELS฀)฀#ON VENTION฀ IN T E R P RE T A T I O N S ฀ WHICH฀ REMAIN฀ V AL I D ฀ AND฀ MUST฀ CON T IN U E ฀ TO฀BE฀ TAKEN฀ INTO฀ CON S I D E R A T I O N