natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E v a l u e r i n g effn k o n t r o l l e r e d e , o m d e r v a r effn b e t y d e l i g sammenhºng mellem budgettets stłrrelse pì den ene side og arten og hyppig-heden af resultater og virkninger pì den anden side, og kom til den konklusion, at der ikke var nogen sammenhºng.
The evaluation did check whether there was any sig-ni«cantrelationshipbetweenthebudgetsize,ontheonehand,andthenatureandfrequen-cy of outputs and impacts on the other, and came to the conclusion that there was none.
Dette skyldes i hvert fald delvis, at de ‹ e s t e d e l t a g e r e i D a ph n eb e t r a g t e r budgettet som et redskab.
This is, at least partly, due to the fact that most participants in Daphne consider the budget as a tool.
De investerer frivilligt arbejde og tilfłrer projektresulta-terne en hłj vºrdi.
They invest voluntary e.ortandattributehighvaluetotheprojectresults.
Hvad man fìr for pengene kan ogsì ses af de fłlgende elementer:
Value for money is also evidenced by the following elements:
Opnìelse af et mìl pì hłjt niveau: opbygning af fºlles de«nitionerellerenfºllestilgangtilvoldsrelaterede emner.
‡ achievement of a high-level objective: generation of common de«nitionsoracommonapproach to a violence-related issue;
Resultaternes kvalitet: Nogle produkter er stadig pìkrºvede efter projektets afslutning eller kan nemt gentages.
‡ quality of the outputs: some outputs are still demanded after the project's end or can be easily replicated;
Projektets bºredygtighed: Projektet eksisterer stadig efter kontraktens afslutning eller har dan-net basis for followup-projekter.
‡ project sustainability: the project still exists after the end of the contract, or it laid the foun-dations for follow-up projects.
Efterevalueringer, der udfłres projektvis af uafhºngige eksperter pì Daphnes vegne, giver endnu en bekrºftelse af, hvad man fìr for pengene.
Another con«rmationofthevalueformoneycomesfromthe ex-post evaluations, carried out by independent experts on behalf of Daphne, project by project.
Ud af 76 projekter, der blev evalueret pì denne mìde i perioden 1998-2000, blev 79 % bedłmt til at give god eller fortrinlig vºrdi for pengene.
Out of 76 projects evaluated in this way between 1998 and 2000, 79 % were assessed as providing good or excellent value for money.
Sidst, men ikke mindst, bedłmmer de ‹esteafdeinterviewedeinteressenteřsomhverkener tidligere eller nuvºrende projektkoordinatorer ̌ Daphne til at have en dobbelt anven-delse:
Last but not least, most stakeholders interviewed ̌ who are not past or present project co-ordinators ̌ consider that Daphne has a dual utility:
‡ Det er unikt i sin integrerende tilgang til emner om vold mod kvinder, unge og błrn (dvs. det betragter alle voldens dimensioner) og pì en europºisk skala.
‡ it is unique in addressing the issues of violence against women, young people and children in an integrated way (i.e. considering all the dimensions of violence) and on a European scale;
‡ Det frembringer positive forandringer i den mìde, vold opfattes og konfronteres i form af forebyggelse og beskyttelse.
‡ it brings about positive changes in the way violence is perceived and addressed in terms of prevention and protection.
Ud fra ovennºvnte dokumentation kan vi erklºre, at programmet er e.ektivt,dvs.atdermedbegrºnset EU-stłtte blev opnìet betydelige prºstationer og virkninger. Denne bedłmmel-se kan modereres af de to fłlgende betragtninger:
From the evidence above, we can state that the programme is e / c i e n t , i . e . w i t h l i m i t e d E U s up po r t , signi«cantachievementsandimpactswererealised.Thisassessmentcanbetem-pered by two considerations:
‡ Der er gjort ekstra indsats i form af bidrag og arbejde fra frivillige, hvilket ikke er kalkuleret systematisk.
‡ there have been additional inputs in the form of contributions in kind and the work of vol-unteers that have not been systematically calculated.
Disse indsatser har ogsì bidraget til resultater og virkninger, men er ikke nłd-vendigvis bºredygtige.
These inputs have also contributed to outputs and impacts, but are not necessarily sustainable;
‡ Blandt partnerne fra den sociale sektor har kun et lille antal den solide ekspertise i ressour-cestyring, de«neringafarbejdsplanerosv.,dergłrdetlettereatanvendedebegrºnsedetilrìdighedstìende ressourcer optimalt og forhindrer, at man brºnder ud.
‡ among the partners from the social sector, only a small number have sound expertise in resource management, de«nitionofworkplans,etc.,thatfacilitatesoptimaluseofthelimited resources available and prevents exhaustion setting in.
I tilfºldet med Daphne-projekter bestìr pro-dukter af alle de aktiviteter, der er udviklet af partnerne under projektet for at stłtte mìlene i Daphne-programmet og for at sikre udbredelse af projektresultaterne. Denne del vedrłrer der-for 148 fuldfłrte projekter, der blev «nansieretiperioden1997-2001,ogsomblevanalyseret(deandre 74 svarede ikke eller kunne ikke lºngere kontaktes: konkurs, forsvundet osv.).
In the case of Daphne projects, outputs consist of all the activities developed by the partners during the project in order to support the objectives of the Daphne programme and to ensure the dissemination of the project results.
De 699 produkter, der blev identi«ceret,blevfordeltsomfłlger:
The 699 outputs identi«edaredistributedasfollows:
Informationsmateriale, inkl. nyhedsbreve
Information materials, including newsletters
Undersłgelser, rapporter, błger
Studies, reports and books
0510Produkter, der blev frembragt inden for projektet (699 produkter)
Outputs achieved within the project (699 outputs)
Vist pì en anden mìde er procentdelen af projekter, der har genereret produkter, som fłlger:
Presented di.erently,thepercentageofprojectshavinggeneratedoutputsareasfollows:
Vejledninger, trºningspakker, manualer
Guidelines, training packages, manuals
Websteder, cd'er, cd-rom'er
Websites, CDs and CD-ROMs
Fordeling af projekter i henhold til de genererede produkter (148 produkter, op til 3 valg pr. projekt)
Distribution of projects according to the outputs achieved (148 projects, up to three choices per project)
Resultaterne af Daphne projekter, der producerede trºningspakker og manualer, en stłrre virkning end de andre, hvad angìr (se ogsì kapitel 4.4 om virkninger):
The outputs `conferences/seminars', `information materials' and `audiovisual products' are those that contribute best to the raising of awareness.
‡ ‚̶ndret adfºrd i mìlgrupper vedrłrende forebyggelse af vold§ (53 % af disse projekter sammenlignet med 40 % for alle de udvalgte projekter)
On the other side, outputs such as `training packages', `studies' and `direct actions' are those that impact directly on the target groups and on the end-bene«ciaries.Infact,theprojectsthat produced training packages and manuals show a higher impact than the others (see also point 4.4 on impacts) in terms of:
‡ ‚Forbedrede metoder for de endelige stłttemodtagere til at tackle deres situation§ (70 % af disse projekter i sammenligning med 55 % for alle de udvalgte projekter).
‡ `changed behaviour of target groups regarding prevention of violence' (53 % of these projects compared with 40 % for the entire sample);‡ `improved means for end-bene«ciariestotackletheirsituation'(70%oftheseprojectscompared with 55 % for the entire sample).
Ovenstìende to punkter, der er bekrºftet af nogle interessenters udtalelser, har en tendens til at vise, at oplysningskampagner er nyttige, hvis man rent faktisk skal forebygge vold.
The above two points, con«rmedbytheopinionofsomestakeholders,tendtoshowthatinformation campaigns are useful for actually preventing violence.
For at man kan forbedre situationen for de endelige stłttemodtagere selv, er det imidlertid mere vigtigt med direkte stłtte og opbakning til de endelige stłttemodtagere end med generel information og łgning af bevidstheden.
However, in order to im-prove the situation of the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s , d i r e c t a d v o c a c y w i t h a n d s up po r t t offe n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s a r e m o r e i m po r t a n t t h a n g e n e r a l i nfo r m a t i o n a n d a w a r e n e s s - r a i s i n g .
97 % af de fuldfłrte projekter gennemfłrte udbredelsesaktiviteter inden for de fłlgende ka-tegorier:
Of the completed projects, 97 % implemented dissemination activities along the following categories:
(N = 144 projekter med udbredelse)
(N = 144 projects with dissemination)
38 % i"Distribution af materiale i"Organisering af events i"Dist. af materiale og org. af events i"Dist. af materiale og tºt kontakt i"Dist. af materiale, org. af events og tºt kontakt
38 % i"Distribution of materiali"Organisation of events i"Distribution of materials and organisation of events i"Distribution of materials and close contacts i"Distribution of materials, organisa-tion of events and close contacts
Nìr man betragter alle mìder separat, fremgìr det, at 98 % af projekterne har distribueret materiale, 90 % har organiseret events, og 42 % har haft tºtte kontakter.
By considering each way separately, it appears that 98 % of the projects have distributed materials, 90 % have organised events and 42 % have had close contacts.
Hvis man betragter projekternes faktiske udbredelse, har hovedparten af dem prºsteret bedre end planlagt: De ‹esteafprojekternehavdedensammeellerenbedreprºstation,hvadangìrudgifter til udbredelse (89 % af projekterne), timing af udbredelse (80 %), publikum (96 %) og udbredelsesaktiviteter (98 %).
Considering their actual dissemination, a large majority of projects performed better than planned: most of the projects had equal or better performance regarding dissemination ex-penditures (89 % of projects), timing of dissemination (80 %), audience (96 %) and dissemina-tion activities (98 %).
Disse sidstnºvnte producerede fłlgende materiale:
The latter produced the following materials:
05101520253035Fordeling af projekter i henhold til deres produktion af materiale til uddeling (144 projekter)
Distribution of projects according to their production of materials for dissemination (144 projects)
I betragtning af at de ‹esteafprojekternehavdeenvarighedpìetìr,kanmanudentvivlsige,atpartnerne har produceret en masse materiale i lłbet af en kort periode, hvilket ses nedenfor:
Considering that most of the projects had a duration of one year, we can evidently state that partners have produced a lot of material over a short period, as indicated below:
227 966 plakater af 27 projekter 13 556 nyhedsbreve af 9 projekter 297 160 brochurer af 27 projekter 77 272 rapporter af 46 projekter 64 600 manualer af 7 projekter 27 700 błger af 19 projekter 370 t-shirts af 2 projekter 731 456 pjecer af 36 projekter 21 553 artikler af 14 projekter 2 000 opslagsbłger af 2 projekter 1 770 videoer af 5 projekter 5 000 klistermºrker af 2 projekter 6 000 postkort af 4 projekter 16 152 cd-rom'er af 12 projekter 2 000 visitkort af 2 projekter 2000 tegne«lmifarveraf1projekt500 behandlinger af 1 projekt 200 knappenìle af 1 projekt
227 966 posters by 27 projects 13 556 newsletters by 9 projects 297 160 brochures by 27 projects 77 272 reports by 46 projects 64 600 manuals by 7 projects 27 700 books by 19 projects 370 t-shirts by 2 projects 731 456 lea‹etsby36projects 21 553 articles by 14 projects 2 000 directories by 2 projects 1 770 videos by 5 projects 5 000 stickers by 2 projects 6 000 postcards by 4 projects 16 152 CD-ROMs by 12 projects 2 000 business cards by 2 projects 2 000 colour cartoons by 1 project 500 protocols by 1 project 200 pins by 1 project.
56 projektprºsentationer arrangeret for 6 projekter, i alt 3 160 besłgende 2 pressekonferencer arrangeret for 1 projekt, i alt 40 besłgende 70 implementeringsmłder arrangeret for 1 projekt og med involvering af 546 personer
71 meetings organised for 19 projects, totalling 880 attendees 51 participations in conferences, for 6 projects, totalling 3 620 attendees 94 conferences organised for 62 projects, totalling 16 793 attendees 389 seminars organised for 64 projects, totalling 11 334 attendees245 workshops organised for 36 projects, totalling 4 356 attendees 56 project presentations organised for 6 projects, totalling 3 160 attendees 2 press conferences organised for 1 project, totalling 40 attendees 70 implementation meetings organised for 1 project and involving 546 persons.
Konferencer, seminarer og workshopper er stºrke redskaber ved arbejde i netvºrk.
Conferences, seminars and workshops are strong instruments for networking.
Deres tillagte vºrdi i forbindelse med udbredelse og generering af virkning er derimod mere tvivl-som:
Their added value for dissemination and generation of impact is, however, more questionable.
‡ De ressourcer, der krºves for at arrangere sìdanne events, er betydelige sammenlignet med andre udbredelsesaktiviteter sìsom udbredelse via et websted.
‡ The resources required to organise such events are substantial, compared with other dis-semination activities such as dissemination through a website.‡ Dissemination mainly concerns the people attending.
‡ Udbredelse vedrłrer hovedsageligt de personer, der deltager. Konferencer, seminarer og workshopper er nyttige under den forudsºtning, at de nìr lºngere ud end til de medlem-mer af mìlgruppen og de endelige stłttemodtagere, der er direkte mìl for projektet, eller at de nìr frem til politiske nłglepersoner og derved kan sikre, at resultaterne fìr en stłrre virkning.
Conferences, seminars and work-shops are useful on condition that they reach target group members and end-bene«ciariesbeyond those directly targeted by the project or that they reach key political people and thus better position the results to have a larger impact.‡ Most of the time, conferences are one-shot events: once they are «nished,thereisoftennofollow-up action with the aim of making things change.
‡ Som regel er konferencer en engangsbegivenhed: Nìr de er fºrdige, er der ofte ikke nogen followup-aktion med det formìl at fì tingene til at ºndre sig. De afslutter derfor projekt-aktiviteterne i stedet for at vºre et led i kºden af udbredelse og virkning.
They therefore conclude the project activities instead of being a link in the dissemination and impact chain.‡ They often take place at the end of the project, which is probably too late to have an impact.
Ikke desto mindre giver konferencer, seminarer og workshopper mulighed for kontakt med et stłrre publikum end ved aktioner i marken eller speci«ktrºning.Foratkonsoliderekonfe-rencer som instrument til udbredelse og virkning foreslìs det:
Nevertheless, conferences, seminars and workshops allow contact with a larger audience than through «eldactionsorspeci«ctraining.Toreinforcetheconferencesasinstrumentsforfur-ther dissemination and impacts, it is suggested to:
‡ at man sikrer sig, at beslutningstagere og politikere inviteres til at deltage
‡ make sure key decision-makers and policy-makers are invited and do attend;
‡ at der gennemfłres followup-aktioner efter konferencen, for at deltagerne kan huske de omhandlede emner.
‡ carry out follow-up actions after the conference to keep the issue in the minds of the at-tendees.
Nogle projekter havde succes med at nì nłglepersoner ved hjºlp af events, som illustreret nedenfor:
Some projects were successful in reaching key people through events, as illustrated below.
Der blev arrangeret et ekspertmłde i projektets 11. mìned.
An expert meeting was organised at month 11 of the project.
Det bragte 50 europºiske interes-senter inden for emnet ‚omskºring af kvinder§ sammen.
It brought together 50 European FGM stakeholders.
Det lykkedes for projektet at bringe relevante partnere sammen tvºrs over Europa og at etablere det fłrste ekspertnetvºrk pì det-te vigtige omrìde. De ºndringer, der blev skabt i den europºiske behandling af besvarelser til spłrgsmìl om omskºring af kvinder, kan i hłj grad fłres tilbage til dette indledende projekt, og de fºllestrºk, der er i disse svar til emnet pì tvºrs af Europa, kan nºsten udelukkende fłres tilbage til dette projekt og dets efterfłlgende kapitler.
The project succeeded in bringing together relevant partners in the «eldacross Europe and establishing the «rstexpertnetworkinthisimportant«eld.Thechangesbrought about in European treatment of responses to FGM can largely be traced back from this initial project and the commonality across Europe of those responses to FGM is due almost en-tirely to this project and its subsequent chapters.
Udvikling af et di.erentieretogintegrerettrºningssystem,derhenvendersigtilaktłrerien‹erstrengettilgang:socialemyndigheder,privatesocialeorganisationer,lovudłvendeorganerog retssystemet, aktłrer pì arbejdsmarkedet, lokale politiske reprºsentanter.
[It fostered the] development of a di.erentiatedandintegratedtrainingsystemaddressingplay-ers in a multi-disciplinary approach: social intervention bodies both from the public and the non-pro«tsector,law-enforcementagenciesandthejudicialsystem,playersinthelabourmar-ket, local political representatives.
Sìdan et di.eren-tieret og integreret trºningssystem har forbedret ekspertisen hos de forskellige aktłrer og har de«neretgodenetvºrksstrategierogpraksis.
Such a di.erentiatedandintegratedtrainingsystemimprovedthe expertise of the di.erentplayersandde«nedgoodnetworkingstrategiesandpractices.
At nì ud til mìlgrupper og endelige stłttemodtagere
Reaching target groups and end-bene«ciaries
Ud over at distribuere materiale og at arrangere events havde 60 projekter tºt kontakt med mìlgrupper og/eller endelige stłttemodtagere. Sìdanne kontakter har hovedsageligt vºret
In addition to the distribution of materials and the organisation of events, 60 projects had close contacts with target groups and/or end-bene«ciaries.Suchcontactshavemainlybeenvisits and discussions with the members of target groups working with the end-bene«ciaries,with the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s a n d a l s o w i t h t a r g e t g r o up s nffo t w o r k i n g d i r e c t l y w i t h e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s s u c h a s n a t i o n a l a uijt h o r i t i e s , ju d i c i a l s t a . a n d Mffe m b e r s o f t h e E u r op e a n P a r l i a mffe n t .
For 49 projekter fandt disse kontakter sted i lłbet af projektet.
For 49 projects, those contacts took place during the project.
For 9 projekter, fandt de sted i lłbet af og efter projektet, og for 2 projekter fandt de sted efter afslutningen af projektet.
For nine projects, they took place during and after the project and for two projects, they took place after completion of the project.
Der var tºt kontakt inden for fłlgende kategorier:
E n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s A . e c t e d w o mffe n : 9 p r o j e c t s Y o u n g people: 8 p r o j e c t s C h i l d r e n : 8 projects
Mìlgruppe‡ Lºrere: 17 projekter‡ Politi og socialarbejdere: 13 projekter hver
Target groups‡ Teachers: 17 projects‡ Police and social workers: 13 projects each‡ Educational sta.(educators,parents):12projects
‡ Undervisningspersonale (lºrere, forºldre): 12 projekter
‡ Local/national authorities, Members of Parliaments, deputies: 12 projects
‡ Endelige stłttemodtagere generelt: 5 projekter
End-bene«ciariesingeneral:5 projects.
‡ Sundhedspersonale, psykologer: 8 projekter‡ Ngo'er: 8 projekter
‡ Medical sta.,psychologists:8projects‡ NGOs: 8 projects‡ EU authorities, MEPs, politicians: 12 projects‡ Judicial sta.:4projects
‡ Andre: 14 projekter (foreninger, velgłrenhedsor-ganisationer, journalister, praktiserende lºger, frivillige, observatłrer for FN, eksperter, brancheforeninger, lłnmodtagerorganisationer, reprºsentanter fra religiłse sammenslutninger)
‡ Other: 14 projects (associations, charities, journalists, practitioners, volunteers, rapporteur for United Nations, experts, trade unions, employers' organisations, representatives of religious communities).
Den europºiske betegnelse hjalp nogle partnere med at fì tºt kontakt med politiske myn-digheder, som illustreret nedenfor:
The European label helped some partners to get in close contact with political authorities, as illustrated below.
Med EU som politisk rygstłtte blev der ìbnet dłre, der havde vºret lukkede i lang tid.
Having the EU as a political backbone opened doors that had been closed for a long time.
Netvºrk, der arbejdede pì dette omrìde, tog fºnomenet hadefuld kriminalitet mod lesbiske kvinder el-ler vold i hjemmet mere alvorligt.
Net-works working in those «eldstookthephenomenonofhatecrimesagainstlesbianwomenandof domestic violence more seriously.
Det var dog stadig svºrt at overvinde den ‚venlige§ lytning og fì dem til at gì i aktion.
Still it was di/culttoovercomethe`friendly'listeningandgetting them into action.
Imidlertid lyttede de til sidst.
However, «nallytheydidlisten.
Udbredelsesaktiviteter blev hovedsageligt udfłrt under projektet. Ca.
Dissemination activities were mainly carried out during the project.
Bevilling fra Leeds Health Action Zone Community til fri udbredelse af videopakken til alle fol-keskoler i Leeds efter afslutningen af kontraktperioden.
Grant from Leeds Health Action Zone Community for free dissemination of the video pack to all Leeds primary and secondary schools after the contractual period.
Den katolske kirke «nansieredeproduktionenaf2000kopierafvoresrapportibogform.
The Catholic Church funded the production of 2 000 copies of our report in book form.
D a ph nffe - « n a n s i e r i n g g j o r d e d e t m u l i g t a t s t a r t e g o d e t i n g o p , m effn d e r e r g effn e r e l t effn m a n g e l p ì m u - l i g h e d e r for followup, sìledes at man kan sikre sig kontinuitet i projektaktiviteterne, da bìde EU og regeringer inden for EU nºgter at betale for dem.
Daphne funding al-lowed great things to start but there is a general lack of possibilities for follow-up to ensure continuity of project activities as both the EC and local governments refuse to take them in charge.
F.eks. krºver opdatering af et web-sted med information pì europºisk niveau eller opretholdelse af et europºisk netvºrk af lokale krisecentre tid og penge.
For example, updating a website with information at European level or maintaining a European network of local crisis centres takes time and money.
Ofte nºgter regeringerne at «nansieresìdannefollowup-aktiviteter, fordi det ikke drejer sig om et projekt i et enkelt land.
Often, local governments refuse to fund such follow-up activity because it is not a local project.
Resultater spºnder fra oprettelse af et europºisk charter om en hjºlpelinje for błrn, oversigt over situationen i Europa med hensyn til voldtºgt og trºnings-programmer med inddragelse af mange organer ̌ trºningsprogrammer, der arbejder med gerningsmºnd, der har begìet vold i hjemmet, og til udvikling af trºningsmoduler for trºnere om forebyggelse af vold i błrns adfºrd, udformning af en forskningsdagsorden for forskere om omskºring af kvinder og meget andet.
The results of the Daphne experience ing training modules for trainers on the prevention of violence in children's behaviour, elaborat-ing a research agenda for academics on female genital mutilation, and many others.
Nogle projektmetoder var innovative sìsom et pilot-trºningsmodul baseret pì en dramaworkshop, der skulle łge selvbestemmelsen hos piger og forebygge seksuelt misbrug, og en trºningspakke, der skulle bruges pì arbejdspladsen for at łge bevidstheden om vold i hjemmet.
Some project methods were innovative, such as a pilot training module based on a drama workshop for the self-empowerment of girls and preventing sexual abuse, and a training resource pack to be used within the workplace to increase awareness of domestic violence.
Mangedoblede virkninger af nye metodologier, sam-arbejde mellem mange organer, trºningsprogrammer, audiovisuelt og informationsteknologisk materiale og andre produkter af nogle af projekterne rºkker vidt og er imponerende.
The multiplier ef-fects of new methodologies, multi-agency cooperation, training programmes, audiovisual and information technology materials and other outcomes/products of some of the projects are far-reaching and impressive.
Den endelige evaluering har ogsì undersłgt programmets virkninger. De er de«neretsommenneskelige og sociale ºndringer, der er frembragt af Daphne eller et af dets projekter.
The «nalevaluationalsostudiedtheimpactsoftheprogramme.Theyarede«nedashumanand social changes brought about by Daphne or one of its projects.