natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Beslutninger om tilsagn anfægter ikke medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheders og domstoles kompetence til at foretage en sådan konstatering og træffe afgørelse i sagen.
Commitment decisions are without prejudice to the powers of competition authorities and courts of the Member States to make such a finding and decide upon the case.
Beslutninger om tilsagn er ikke på sin plads i tilfælde, hvor Kommissionen agter at pålægge en bøde.
Commitment decisions are not appropriate in cases where the Commission intends to impose a fine.
) Rådets forordning nr. 19/65/EØF af 2. marts 1965 om anvendelse af bestemmelserne i traktatens artikel 81, stk. 3 (Forordningens titler er tilpasset under hensyn til omnummereringen af EF-traktatens artikler i henhold til artikel 12 i Amsterdamtraktaten. Den oprindelige henvisning var til traktatens artikel 85, stk. 3), på kategorier af aftaler og samordnet praksis (EFT 36 af 6.3.1965, s. 533/65).
) Council Regulation No 19/65/EEC of 2 March 1965 on the application of Article 81(3) ( The titles of the Regulations have been adjusted to take account of the renumbering of the Articles of the EC Treaty, in accordance with Article 12 of the Treaty of Amsterdam; the original reference was to Article 85(3) of the Treaty) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices (OJ 36, 6.3.1965, p. 533).
Senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1215/1999 (EFT L 148 af 15.6.1999, s. 1). )
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1215/1999 (OJ L 148, 15.6.1999, p. 1). )
Senest ændret ved tiltrædelsesakten af 1994. )
Regulation as last amended by the Act of Accession of 1994. )
Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3976/87 af 14. december 1987 om anvendelse af traktatens artikel 81, stk. 3 (Forordningens titler er tilpasset under hensyn til omnummereringen af EF-traktatens artikler i henhold til artikel 12 i Amsterdamtraktaten. Den oprindelige henvisning var til traktatens artikel 85, stk. 3), på visse kategorier af aftaler og samordnet praksis inden for luftfartssektoren (EFT L 374 af 31.12.1987, s. 9).
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3976/87 of 14 December 1987 on the application of Article 81(3) ( The titles of the Regulations have been adjusted to take account of the renumbering of the Articles of the EC Treaty, in accordance with Article 12 of the Treaty of Amsterdam; the original reference was to Article 85(3) of the Treaty) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector (OJ L 374, 31.12.1987, p. 9).
Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1534/91 af 31. maj 1991 om anvendelse af traktatens artikel 81, stk. 3 (Forordningens titler er tilpasset under hensyn til omnummereringen af EF-traktatens artikler i henhold til artikel 12 i Amsterdamtraktaten. Den oprindelige henvisning var til traktatens artikel 85, stk. 3), på visse kategorier af aftaler, vedtagelser og samordnet praksis på forsikringsområdet (EFT L 143 af 7.6.1991, s. 1). )
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1534/91 of 31 May 1991 on the application of Article 81(3) ( The titles of the Regulations have been adjusted to take account of the renumbering of the Articles of the EC Treaty, in accordance with Article 12 of the Treaty of Amsterdam; the original reference was to Article 85(3) of the Treaty) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices in the insurance sector (OJ L 143, 7.6.1991, p. 1). )
Senest ændret ved tiltrædelsesakten af 1994.
Regulation amended by the Act of Accession of 1994.
For at klargøre retstilstanden og sikre, at retsreglerne anvendes på en ensartet måde i Fællesskabet, navnlig i forbindelse med nye typer aftaler eller praksis, som ikke er blevet afgjort i retspraksis og administrativ praksis, kan det desuden i særlige tilfælde, hvor almene fællesskabsinteresser kræver det, være hensigtsmæssigt for Kommissionen at vedtage en beslutning af deklaratorisk karakter, hvorved det konstateres, at forbuddet i traktatens artikel 81 eller artikel 82 ikke finder anvendelse.
In exceptional cases where the public interest of the Community so requires, it may also be expedient for the Commission to adopt a decision of a declaratory nature finding that the prohibition in Article81or Article 82 of the Treaty does not apply, with a view to clarifying the law and ensuring its consistent application throughout the Community, in particular with regard to new types of agreements or practices that have not been settled in the existing case-law and administrative practice.
Kommissionen og medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder bør sammen danne et netværk af offentlige myndigheder, der anvender Fællesskabets konkurrenceregler i nært samarbejde.
The Commission and the competition authorities of the Member States should form together a network of public authorities applying the Community competition rules in close cooperation.
Det er derfor nødvendigt at indføre informations- og konsultationsprocedurer.
For that purpose it is necessary to set up arrangements for information and consultation.
De nærmere retningslinjer for samarbejdet i netværket vil blive udarbejdet og revideret af Kommissionen i nært samarbejde med medlemsstaterne.
Further modalities for the cooperation within the network will be laid down and revised by the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States.
Uanset enhver modstridende nationale bestemmelse, bør netværkets medlemmer have adgang til at udveksle selv fortrolige oplysninger og anvende disse som bevismateriale.
Notwithstanding any national provision to the contrary, the exchange of information and the use of such information in evidence should be allowed between the members of the network even where the information is confidential.
Disse oplysninger kan benyttes i forbindelse med anvendelsen af traktatens artikel 81 og 82 og i forbindelse med en parallel anvendelse af national konkurrenceret forudsat at sidstnævnte anvendelse vedrører den samme sag og ikke fører til et andet resultat.
This information may be used for the application of Articles81and 82 of the Treaty as well as for the parallel application of national competition law, provided that the latter application relates to the same case and does not lead to a different outcome.
Når de udvekslede oplysninger anvendes af den modtagende myndighed til at pålægge virksomheder sanktioner, bør der ikke være andre begrænsninger for anvendelsen af oplysningerne en den forpligtelse til at anvende dem til det formål, med hvilket de blev indsamlet, i det de sanktioner, der pålægges virksomheder, er af samme art i alle systemerne.
When the information exchanged is used by the receiving authority to impose sanctions on undertakings, there should be no other limit to the use of the information than the obligation to use it for the purpose for which it was collected given the fact that the sanctions imposed on undertakings are of the same type in all systems.
Virksomhedernes ret til forsvar i de forskellige systemer kan anses for at være tilstrækkeligt en s. Fysiske personer kan imidlertid blive underlagt sanktioner af meget forskellig art i de forskellige systemer.
The rights of defence enjoyed by undertakings in the various systems can be considered as sufficiently equivalent. However, as regards natural persons, they may be subject to substantially different types of sanctions across the various systems.
I sådanne tilfælde bør det sikres, at oplysningerne kun kan anvendes, hvis de er indsamlet på en måde, der sikrer samme beskyttelsesniveau for så vidt angår fysiske personers ret til forsvar, som det, der er foreskrevet i den modtagende myndigheds nationale lovgivning.
Where that is the case, it is necessary to ensure that information can only be used if it has been collected in away which respects the same level of protection of the rights of defence of natural persons as provided for under the national rules of the receiving authority.
For at sikre såvel en ensartet anvendelse af konkurrencereglerne som en optimal håndtering af netværket, er det nødvendigt at bibeholde bestemmelsen om, at medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder automatisk mister deres kompetence, når Kommissionen indleder en procedure.
If the competition rules are to be applied consistently and, at the same time, the network is to be managed in the best possible way, it is essential to retain the rule that the competition authorities of the Member States are automatically relieved of their competence if the Commission initiates its own proceedings.
Hvis en medlemsstats konkurrencemyndighed allerede er ved at behandle en sag, og Kommissionen agter at indlede en procedure, bør den gøre det snarest muligt.
Where a competition authority of a Member State is already acting on a case and the Commission intends to initiate proceedings, it should endeavour to do so as soon as possible.
Før Kommissionen indleder procedure, bør den rådføre sig med den pågældende nationale konkurrencemyndighed.
Before initiating proceedings, the Commission should consult the national authority concerned.
For at sikre den mest hensigtsmæssige sagsfordeling inden for netværket, bør der indføres en generel bestemmelse om, at en konkurrencemyndighed kan suspendere eller afslutte en sag med den begrundelse, at en anden myndighed behandler eller har behandlet den samme sag, eftersom målet er, at den enkelte sag kun behandles af én myndighed.
To ensure that cases are dealt with by the most appropriate authorities within the network, a general provision should be laid down allowing a competition authority to suspend or close a case on the ground that another authority is dealing with it or has already dealt with it, the objective being that each case should be handled by a single authority.
Denne bestemmelse bør ikke forhindre Kommissionen i at afvise en klage, som følge af manglende fællesskabsinteresse, hvilket den har mulighed for efter Domstolens retspraksis, selv om ingen andre konkurrencemyndigheder har tilkendegivet, at de agter at behandle sagen.
This provision should not prevent the Commission from rejecting a complaint for lack of Community interest, as the case-law of the Court of Justice has acknowledged it may do, even if no other competition authority has indicated its intention of dealing with the case.
Det Rådgivende Udvalg for Kartel- og Monopolspørgsmål, der er oprettet ved forordning nr. 17, har fungeret meget tilfredsstillende.
The Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions set up by Regulation No 17 has functioned in a very satisfactory manner.
Dette udvalg passer godt ind i den nye decentraliserede gennemførelsesordning.
It will fit well into the new system of decentralised application.
Det er derfor nødvendigt at tage udgangspunkt i de regler, der er fastlagt ved forordning nr. 17, og samtidig effektivisere arbejdsgangen.
It is necessary, therefore, to build upon the rules laid down by Regulation No 17, while improving the effectiveness of the organisational arrangements.
Det bør desuden kunne tjene som forum for drøftelse af sager, der behandles af medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder, og dermed bidrage til en ensartet anvendelse af Fællesskabets konkurrenceregler.
The Advisory Committee should also be able to act as a forum for discussing cases that are being handled by the competition authorities of the Member States, so as to help safeguard the consistent application of the Community competition rules.
Det rådgivende udvalg bør bestå af repræsentanter fra medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder.
The Advisory Committee should be composed of representatives of the competition authorities of the Member States.
På møder, hvor generelle spørgsmål drøftes, bør medlemsstaterne have mulighed for at udpege yderligere en repræsentant.
For meetings in which general issues are being discussed, Member States should be able to appoint an additional representative.
Dette berører dog ikke udvalgsmedlemmers mulighed for at lade sig bistå af andre eksperter fra medlemsstaterne.
This is without prejudice to members of the Committee being assisted by other experts from the Member States.
Den ensartede anvendelse af konkurrencereglerne forudsætter også, at der etableres et samarbejde mellem medlemsstaternes domstole og Kommissionen.
Consistency in the application of the competition rules also requires that arrangements be established for cooperation between the courts of the Member States and the Commission.
Dette er relevant for alle domstole i medlemsstaterne, som anvender traktatens artikel 81 og 82, hvadenten de anvender dem i søgsmål mellem private parter, eller fungerer som offentlige håndhævere eller appelretter.
This is relevant for all courts of the Member States that apply Articles81and 82 of the Treaty, whether applying these rules in lawsuits between private parties, acting as public enforcers or as review courts.
De nationale domstole bør især have mulighed for at henvende sig til Kommissionen for at indhente oplysninger eller udtalelser om anvendelsen af Fællesskabets konkurrenceret.
In particular, national courts should be able to ask the Commission for information or for its opinion on points concerning the application of Community competition law.
Kommissionen og medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder bør have adgang til at afgive skriftlige eller mundtlige indlæg for domstolene i forbindelse med disses anvendelse af traktatens artikel 81 eller 82.
The Commission and the competition authorities of the Member States should also be able to submit written or oral observations to courts called upon to apply Article81or Article 82 of the Treaty.
Indlæggene bør fremsættes inden for rammerne af de nationale procedureregler og den nationale praksis, herunder regler der beskytter parternes rettigheder.
These observations should be submitted within the framework of national procedural rules and practices including those safeguarding the rights of the parties.
Det bør derfor sikres, at Kommissionen og medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder informeres tilstrækkeligt om de retssager, der verserer for de nationale domstole.
Steps should therefore be taken to ensure that the Commission and the competition authorities of the Member States are kept sufficiently well informed of proceedings before national courts.
Af hensyn til retssikkerheden og den ensartede anvendelse af Fællesskabets konkurrenceregler under en ordning med parallel kompetence skal modstridende beslutninger undgås.
In order to ensure compliance with the principles of legal certainty and the uniform application of the Community competition rules in a system of parallel powers, conflicting decisions must be avoided.
Det bør derfor i overensstemmelse med Domstolens retspraksis præciseres, hvilke virkninger Kommissionens beslutninger og procedurer har for medlemsstaternes domstole og konkurrencemyndigheder.
It is therefore necessary to clarify, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, the effects of Commission decisions and proceedings on courts and competition authorities of the Member States.
Kommissionens beslutninger om tilsagn berører ikke medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheders og domstoles kompetence til at anvende traktatens artikel 81 og 82.
Commitment decisions adopted by the Commission do not affect the power of the courts and the competition authorities of the Member States to apply Articles81and 82 of the Treaty.
Kommissionen bør have beføjelse til i hele Fællesskabet at krævede oplysninger forelagt, der er nødvendige for at afsløre aftaler, vedtagelser og samordnet praksis, som er forbudt efter artikel 81, og misbrug af en dominerende stilling, som er forbudt efter traktatens artikel 82.
The Commission should be empowered throughout the Community to require such information to be supplied as is necessary to detect any agreement, decision or concerted practice prohibited by Article81of the Treaty or any abuse of a dominant position prohibited by Article 82 of the Treaty.
Når virksomheder efterkommer en kommissionsbeslutning, kan de ikke pålægges at vedgå en overtrædelse, mende er under alle omstændigheder forpligtet til at besvare faktuelle spørgsmål og fremlægge dokumenter, selv om disse oplysninger kan blive brugt i mod dem eller i mod en anden virksomhed til at fastslå, at der foreligger en overtrædelse.
When complying with a decision of the Commission, undertakings cannot be forced to admit that they have committed an infringement, but they are in any event obliged to answer factual questions and to provide documents, even if this information may be used to establish against them or against another undertaking the existence of an infringement.
Kommissionen bør også have beføjelse til at foretage de kontrolundersøgelser, der er nødvendige for at afsløre aftaler, vedtagelser og samordnet praksis, som er forbudt efter traktatens artikel 81, og misbrug af en dominerende stilling, som er forbudt efter traktatens artikel 82.
The Commission should also be empowered to undertake such inspections as are necessary to detect any agreement, decision or concerted practice prohibited by Article81of the Treaty or any abuse of a dominant position prohibited by Article 82 of the Treaty.
Medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder bør samarbejde aktivt med Kommissionen i forbindelse med udøvelsen af disse beføjelser.
The competition authorities of the Member States should cooperate actively in the exercise of these powers.
Da det bliver stadig vanskeligere at afsløre overtrædelser af konkurrencereglerne, er det nødvendigt at supplere Kommissionens undersøgelsesbeføjelser for at sikre en effektiv beskyttelse af konkurrencen.
The detection of infringements of the competition rules is growing ever more difficult, and, in order to protect competition effectively, the Commission's powers of investigation need to be supplemented.
Kommissionen bør blandt andet beføjes til at indhente udtalelse fra enhver person, der kan tænkes at være i besiddelse af nyttige oplysninger, og registrere den pågældende persons udtalelser.
The Commission should in particular be empowered to interview any persons who may be in possession of useful information and to record the statements made.
Desuden bør Kommissionens befuldmægtigede repræsentanter under en kontrolundersøgelse have beføjelse til at forsegle lokaler eller dokumenter i det tidsrum, der er påkrævet af hensyn til kontrolundersøgelsen.
In the course of an inspection, officials authorised by the Commission should be empowered to affix seals for the period of time necessary for the inspection.
Forseglingerne bør normalt ikke opretholdes i mere end 72 timer.
Seals should normally not be affixed for more than 72 hours.
Kommissionens befuldmægtigede repræsentanter bør også have beføjelse til at kræve alle oplysninger, der er relevante for kontrolundersøgelsens genstand og formål.
Officials authorised by the Commission should also be empowered to ask for any information relevant to the subjectmatter and purpose of the inspection.
Erfaringerne viser, at forretningspapirer i visse tilfælde opbevares i virksomhedsledernes og medarbejdernes private hjem.
Experience has shown that there are cases where business records are kept in the homes of directors or other people working for an undertaking.
Af hensyn til kontrolundersøgelsernes effektivitet bør repræsentanter for og andre personer, der er bemyndiget af Kommissionen, derfor have adgang til alle de lokaler, hvor forretningspapirer kan tænkes at være opbevaret, herunder private hjem.
In order to safeguard the effectiveness of inspections, therefore, officials and other persons authorised by the Commission should be empowered to enter any premises where business records may be kept, including private homes.
Udøvelsen af denne beføjelse bør dog være betinget af en domstolstilladelse.
However, the exercise of this latter power should be subject to the authorisation of the judicial authority.
Med forbehold af Domstolens retspraksis er det hensigtsmæssigt at udstikke rækkevidden af den kontrol, den nationale domstol kan udøve, når den i henhold til national ret herunder som en forudgående sikkerhedsforanstaltning skal give tilladelse til, at politiet kan tilkaldes, med henblik på at overvinde en eventuel modstand fra virksomhedens side eller til gennemførelsen af en beslutning om at gennemføre en kontrolundersøgelse af andre lokaler end forretningslokaler.
Without prejudice to the case-law of the Court of Justice, it is useful to set out the scope of the control that the national judicial authority may carry out when it authorises, as foreseen by national law including as a precautionary measure, assistance from law enforcement authorities in order to overcome possible opposition on the part of the undertaking or the execution of the decision to carry out inspections in non-business premises.
Det følger af Domstolens retspraksis, at den nationale domstol navnlig kan anmode Kommissionen om sådanne supplerende oplysninger, som den behøver for at kunne udøve sin kontrol, og uden hvilke den kunne afslå en anmodning om tilladelse.
It results from the case-law that the national judicial authority may in particular ask the Commission for further information which it needs to carry out its control and in the absence of which it could refuse the authorisation.
Endvidere har Domstolen ved sin retspraksis bekræftet de nationale domstoles kompetence til at føre kontrol med anvendelsen af nationale regler for gennemførelse af tvangsindgreb.
The case-law also confirms the competence of the national courts to control the application of national rules governing the implementation of coercive measures.
For at give medlemsstaternes konkurrencemyndigheder større muligheder for at anvende artikel 81 og 82 effektivt, bør de kunne bistå hinanden med kontrolundersøgelser og andre former for indsamling af oplysninger.
In order to help the competition authorities of the Member States to apply Articles81and 82 of the Treaty effectively, it is expedient to enable them to assist one another by carrying out inspections and other fact-finding measures.
Det bør ved bøder og tvangsbøder kunne sikres, at traktatens artikel 81 og 82 samt de forpligtelser, der pålægges virksomheder og virksomhedssammenslutninger i henhold til nærværende forordning, overholdes.
Compliance with Articles81and 82 of the Treaty and the fulfilment of the obligations imposed on undertakings and associations of undertakings under this Regulation should be enforceable by means of fines and periodic penalty payments.
For at sikre en effektiv inddrivelse af bøder, der er pålagt virksomhedssammenslutninger for de overtrædelser, de har begået, er det nødvendigt at fastsætte, på hvilke vilkår Kommissionen kan kræve, at medlemmerne af sammenslutningen betaler bøden, hvis sammenslutningen ikke er solvent.
In order to ensure effective recovery of fines imposed on associations of undertakings for infringements that they have committed, it is necessary to lay down the conditions on which the Commission may require payment of the fine from the members of the association where the association is not solvent.
Kommissionen bør i den forbindelse tage hensyn til den relative størrelse af de virksomheder, der er medlemmer af sammenslutningen, og især til små og mellemstore virksomheders situation.
In doing so, the Commission should have regard to the relative size of the undertakings belonging to the association and in particular to the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Betaling af bøder foretaget af et eller flere medlemmer af en sammenslutning anfægter ikke nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter der kan gøres regres for det erlagte beløb i forhold til andre medlemmer af sammenslutningen.
Payment of the fine by one or several members of an association is without prejudice to rules of national law that provide for recovery of the amount paid from other members of the association.
2988/74 (1), der også vedrører økonomiske sanktioner på transportområdet.
The rules on periods of limitation for the imposition of fines and periodic penalty payments were laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2988/74 (1), which also concerns penalties in the field of transport.