natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Desuden er mekanismen et vºrktłj, der sikrer en bedre regule-ring, idet de forskellige kompetente myndigheder, bìde pì fºlles-skabsplan og pì nationalt plan, kan foregribe problemerne og dermed undgì bekostelige og kontroversielle overtrºdelsespro-cedurer, som fłrst kan ivºrksºttes efterfłlgende.
Furthermore, this mechanism is a tool of better regulation since it allows the d i . e r e n t c o m p e t e n t a uijt h o r i t i e s , bo t h a t C o m mstu - n i t y and national levels, to prevent problems ex ante thus avoid-ing costly and controversial infringement proceedings which can only be launched ex post.
Udveksling og indsamling af information er ogsì en e.ektivmetodetilsikringaf,at bedste praksis pì nationalt plan bliver videreformidlet og be-nyttet som model for andre reguleringsinitiativer.
The exchange and gathering of information is also an e.ectivewayofensuringthatnationalbest practices become known and are used as a model for oth-er regulatory initiatives.
Efter en rapport fra Kommissionen fra 2002, hvori man analyse-rer hindringer for friheden til at levere tjenester og den frie etableringsret pì det indre marked, arbejder Kommissionens tjenestegrene pì en mulig udvidelse af direktiv 98/34, sì det
A pre-adoption screening procedure for all draft technical regula-tions and standards relating to products was therefore established and gradually expanded. The Commission, the Member States, in-dustry and individuals thus have an open window upon technical activities, which enables them to eliminate at source any barriers to the free movement of goods.
Man indfłrte derfor en undersłgelsesprocedure forud for ved-tagelsen for alle udkast til tekniske forskrifter og standarder vedrłrende produkter, og denne er gradvis blevet udvidet. Kommissionen, medlemsstaterne, erhvervslivet og enkeltper-soner har nu frit indblik i de tekniske aktiviteter, hvilket giver dem mulighed for at －erneìrsagernetilenhverhindringforvarernes frie bevºgelighed.
Following a 2002 Commission Report which analysed barriers to the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establish-ment in the Internal Market, the Commission's services are work-ing on the possible extension of Directive 98/34 to cover services other than Information Society services.
Sìvel erhvervslivet som Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne er involveret i informationsproceduren. Ud over muligheden for at gennemgì lovgivningen i deres egne lande fìr virksomhe-derne i medlemsstaterne mulighed for at gennemgì forslag til lovgivning i lande, som de eksporterer til eller łnsker at ekspor-tere til, eller hvor de leverer eller łnsker at levere informations-samfundets tjenester.
Industry, as well as the Commission and the Member States, is involved in the noti«cationprocedure.Besidesbeingabletoexamine legislation in their own countries, enterprises in the Member States have the opportunity of examining legislation proposed by countries to which they export or wish to export or to which they provide or envisage to provide Information Society services.
De kan sìledes planlºgge en tilpasning af deres produkter eller tjenester til de nye krav. De kan ligele-des identi«cereprotektionistiskeelementeriforslageneogfor-anledige dem －ernet.
As a consequence, they can plan to adapt their products or services to the new requirements; they can also identify protectionist elements in the drafts and take ac-tion to have them eliminated.
For at kunne drage fuld nytte af systemet skal erhvervslivet derfor vide, hvordan det fungerer, og hvordan det fìr adgang til de anmeldte tekster.
In order to use the system to full advantage, industry must therefore know how it works and how to access the noti«edtexts.
Dette kan ske gennem et besłg i vores o.entligedatabasepìfłlgendeadresse:http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris.
This may be done by means of a visit to our public data-base at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ enterprise/tris.
Denne brochure er et ud af en rºkke initiativer fra Kommissio-nens side, der har til formìl at bringe fºllesskabslovgivningen tºttere pì brugerne.
This booklet is one of a number of Commission initiatives de-signed to bring Community law closer to those who use it.
Det er mit hìb, at denne publikation vil bidrage til at lette den informationsudveksling og dialog og det samarbejde, der danner grundlag for en ny fºllesskabskul-tur.
My hope is that its publication will help to enhance the exchange of information, dialogue and cooperation which has constitut-ed a new community culture.
Sabine L e c r e n i e r K o n tffo r c h ef G e nffe r a l d i r e k tffo r a t e t for Erhvervspolitik
Sabine Lecrenier Head of Unit Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry
Indledning: Direktiv 98/34/EF, et instrument for ìbenhed i det indre markeds tjeneste
Introduction: Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market
Fłrst i 1980'erne lancerede Kommissionen med udgangspunkt i den sìkaldte •Cassis de Dijon•-dom fra Domstolen en ny poli-tik med henblik pì at gennemfłre det indre marked ud fra tre grundprincipper:
At the beginning of the 1980s the Commission, basing itself on a Court of Justice ruling known as the `Cassis de Dijon' judg-ment, launched a new policy designed to complete the inter-nal market on the basis of three concepts:
Fłrste del vedrłrer proceduren for fremsendelse af information om nye nationale initiativer, der efter planen skal fłre til udar-bejdelse af nationale standarder, mellem nationale standardi-seringsorganer, europºiske standardiseringsorganer, CEN (Den Europºiske Standardiseringsorganisation), CENELEC (Den Europºiske Komitï for Elektroteknisk Standardisering) og ETSI (Det Europºiske Standardiseringsinstitut for Telekommunika-tion) samt Europa-Kommissionen.
The «rstpartrelatestotheprocedurefortheprovisionofinfor-mation on new national initiatives which should lead to the formulation of national standards between the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies, name-ly CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation) and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and the European Commission.
Kommissionen har givet de europºiske standardiseringsorganer ansvaret for at gennem-fłre proceduren gennem en ìrlig kontrakt.
The Commission has given the European standardisation bodies responsibility for implement-ing this procedure, by means of an annual contract.
› Medlemsstaterne skal acceptere produkter, der er fremstillet i henhold til lovgivningen i resten af Fºllesskabet (•gensidig anerkendelse•);
› Acceptance in each Member State of products lawfully man-ufactured in the rest of the Community (`mutual recogni-tion');
Anden del af direktivet er rettet til medlemsstaterne, som har accepteret at deltage i et gensidigt system for gennemsigtig-hed og overvìgning pì reguleringsomrìdet.
› Harmonisation limited to important economic sectors cover-ing, in particular, health, safety and the environment;
› Overvìgning af nationale bestemmelser baseret pì forebyg-gelse.
› A prevention-based approach to monitoring national regu-lations.
› Systemet er forebyggende: Der udveksles oplysninger, nìr de tekniske forskrifter vedrłrende produkter eller forskrifter om informationssamfundets tjenester endnu er pì forslags-stadiet og kan ºndres med henblik pì at sikre overholdelsen af principperne for det indre marked.
› The system is of a preventive nature: information is provided when technical regulations relating to products or rules on Information Society services are still at the draft stage, and may be amended in order to conform with the principles of the internal market.
I dag har Den Europºiske Unions medlemsstater pligt til at give Kommissionen og de łvrige medlemsstater meddelelse om alle tekniske forskrifter vedrłrende produkter og informations-samfundets tjenester, fłr de indfłres i national lovgivning.
Today, the Member States of the European Union are obliged to notify to the Commission and to the other Member States any draft technical regulation concerning products and Infor-mation Society services before they are adopted in national law.
Princippet var revolutionerende pì davºrende tidspunkt og er det fortsat - i en sìdan grad, at Kommissionen er i fºrd med at undersłge, om det kan udvides til andre omrìder.
The concept was revolutionary at the time and has remained so - to the extent that the Commission is examining whether it could be extended to other areas.
Informationsudvekslingen sker i henhold til en todelt procedure, hvor direktivet opdeles i to adskilte dele, der supplerer hinanden.
› It is not only the Commission which can examine and mon-itor the texts through the operation of standstill periods, but also all the Member States; the latter have acknowl-edged the advantages of a procedure which allows for re-ciprocal i n ‹ u e n c e o v e r t h e i r l effg i s l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s .
› Systemet głr det ogsì muligt at lºgge forslag til national lovgivning pì is i en vis periode for at lette drłftelserne om de pìgºldende spłrgsmìl pì fºllesskabsplan i lyset af har-moniseringsinitiativer. Ved hjºlp af denne observation af
T h e T r e a - t y itself merely made provision for retrospective monitoring by the Member States, through the use of the more cum-bersome infringement procedures which are rarely applied between Member States.
Direktiv af 28. marts 1983. EFT L 109, 26.4.1983, s. 8.Direktiv af 22. juni 1998. EFT L 204, 21.7.1998, s. 37.
Directive of 28 March 1983. OJ L 109, 26.4.1983, p.
lovgivningen bliver det ogsì lettere at identi«ceredereellebehov for harmonisering.
Moreover, by means of this legislative observa-tory, the real needs for harmonisation can be identi«edmore easily.
benchmarking, som giver medlemsstaterne mulighed for at udnytte deres partneres idïer til at lłse fºlles problemer ved-rłrende tekniske forskrifter, navnlig inden for sektorer, der fłrst er blevet reguleret for nylig sìsom gmo'er, domºnenav-ne og genterapi.
This mechanism has also proved to be a formidable benchmarking tool which allows Member States to draw on the ideas of their partners in order to solve common problems regarding technical regulations, especially in newly regulated sectors such as GMOs, domain names and gene therapy.
Kommissionen anvender desuden direktiv 98/34/EF som un-dervisningsmateriale med henblik pì at justere medlemssta-ternes lovgivningsstil.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
Systemet kom kun langsomt i gang, men er nu kommet op i fart og har givet Kommissionen, medlemsstaterne og virksom-hederne et indblik i de nationale myndigheders og standardi-seringsorganers aktiviteter pì det tekniske omrìde (bestem-melser vedrłrende produkters sammensºtning, mºrkning, navngivning, prłvning osv. samt bestemmelser vedrłrende produkternes livscyklus frem til bortska.elsen).Direktivetsdºkningsomrìde er gradvist blevet udvidet, sì det nu omfat-ter alle landbrugs- og industriprodukter, og der tages hensyn til et stadigt stigende antal bestemmelser, navnlig for at forhin-dre foranstaltninger, der indirekte krºver overholdelse af tek-niske speci«kationer,iatsmuttegennemnettet.I1998blevproceduren gennem direktiv 98/48/EF udvidet til ogsì at om-fatte informationssamfundets tjenester.
Through this instrument, the Commission not only succeeds in removing provisions which are contrary to Community law, but also contributes to the formulation of provisions to be written into national legislation to ensure that economic operators are fully informed of their rights and permit application in practice of the principle of `mutual recognition' contained in the Euro-pean Court of Justice (ECJ) interpretation of Articles 28 et seq. of the Treaty.
Ved hjºlp af dette instrument lykkes det ikke blot Kommissio-nen at －ernebestemmelser,derstridermodfºllesskabslovgiv-ningen, men det bidrager ligeledes til udformning af bestem-melser, der skal medtages i den nationale lovgivning for at sikre, at de erhvervsdrivende informeres fuldt ud om deres ret-tigheder, og giver mulighed for den praktiske anvendelse af princippet om •gensidig anerkendelse•, der er indeholdt i De Europºiske Fºllesskabers Domstols fortolkning af traktatens artikel 28 ..
The system, which got o.toaslowstart,hasgainedmomen-tum and has provided the Commission, the Member States and enterprises with a window on the activities of national authori-ties and standardisation bodies in the technical «eld(rulesre-lating to product composition, labelling, name, testing, etc., as well as rules relating to product life cycle through to disposal).
Direktiv 98/34/EF, som allerede er blevet anvendt delvist i EFTA-landene siden 1990, er ligeledes delvis blev ud-videt til at omfatte Tyrkiet i henhold til associeringsaftalen med Tyrkiet.
In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
Direktivet har ogsì fungeret som model for en konvention vedtaget af Europarìdet.Anvendelsen af infor-mationsproceduren har givet anledning nye former for prak-sis. Der har udviklet sig en hel «loso«forinformationsudveks-ling, dialog og samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne.
According to this principle, each Member State must accept the sale in its territory of any product lawfully manufactured or marketed in another Member State, subject, where legitimate interests, such as health and safety questions are at stake, to these products guaranteeing an equivalent level of protection.
Mekanismen har ogsì vist sig at vºre et fantastisk vºrktłj til
The corollary to this acceptance of products from the rest of
I henhold til dette princip skal de enkelte medlemsstater accep-tere, at alle produkter, der lovligt fremstilles eller markedsfłres i en anden medlemsstat, kan sºlges pì deres omrìde pì betin-gelse af, at produkterne sikrer et beskyttelsesniveau, der er i overensstemmelse med medlemsstatens legitime interesser vedrłrende sikkerhed og sundhed.
The geographical scope of the Directive was also gradually ex-tended. Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
Fłlgen af denne accept af produkter fra resten af Fºllesskabet - som gennem aftalen om Det Europºiske Łkonomiske Samarbejdsomrìde udvides til
The Directive has also provided a model for a Convention of the Council of Europe.
Direktiv 83/189/EŁF blev navnlig ºndret ved Rìdets direktiv 88/182/EŁF af 22. marts 1988 (EFT L 81, 26.3.1988, s. 75) og ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rìdets direktiv 94/10/EF af 23. marts 1994 (EFT L 100, 19.4.1994, s. 30).
Directive 83/189/EEC was amended principally by Council Directive 88/182/EEC of 22 March 1988 (OJ L 81, 26.3.1988, p. 75) and by European Parliament and Council Directive 94/10/EC of 23 March 1994 (OJ L 100, 19.4.1994, p. 30).
Aftalen mellem medlemsstaterne i EFTA og EŁF om en procedure for udveksling af informationer om tekniske forskrifter trìdte i kraft i november 1990.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
Aftalen om Det Europºiske Łkonomiske Samarbejdsomrìde, der trìdte i kraft den 1. januar 1994, omfatter ligeledes direktiv 83/189/EŁF med de nłdvendige tilpas-ninger. Selv om Schweiz ikke har underskrevet denne aftale, anvender dette land fortsat proceduren for udveksling af information.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
Europarìdets konvention nr. 180 om information og juridisk samarbejde vedrłrende •informationssamfundets tjenester•.
Convention No 180 of the Council of Europe on Information and Legal Co-operation concerning `Information Society Services'.
udłvelsen af [sìdanne] friheder mindre attraktiv• (etableringsfri-hed og frihed til at udbyde tjenester).
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
produkter fra de EFTA-lande, der har underskrevet aftalen- er gensidig anerkendelse af bestemmelserne vedrłrende udform-ning, fremstilling og prłvning af produkter samt de anvendte procedurer for overensstemmelsesvurderinger. Medlemsstater-ne og Kommissionen underrettes om disse bestemmelser gen-nem proceduren for informationsudveksling i henhold til direk-tiv 98/34/EF.
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
For at kunne anerkendes som en undtagelse fra de grundlºg-gende friheder pì det indre marked pì et ikke-harmoniseret omrìde skal en national restriktion i henhold til denne rets-praksis vºre i overensstemmelse med principperne om ikke-diskriminering, nłdvendighed og proportionalitet.
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Desuden fortolkes bestemmelserne i afgłrelse nr. 1/95 i over-ensstemmelse med de relevante afgłrelser fra De Europºiske Fºllesskabers Domstol vedrłrende EF-traktatens bestemmel-ser, navnlig artikel 28-30, med hensyn til deres indfłrelse og anvendelse pì produkter, der er omfattet af toldunionen. Afgł-relsen er t r u .ffe t a f A sffs o c i e r i n g s r ì d e t EF - T y r k i e t d e n 2 2 . d e c e mb e r 1995 om ivºrksºttelse af slutfasen af toldunionen, som giver mulighed for at afska.ekvantitativerestriktionerellerfor-anstaltninger med tilsvarende virkning mellem EU og Tyrkiet.
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
Nationale bestemmelser, der ikke tager hensyn til krav, som en erhvervsdrivende allerede opfylder i den medlemsstat, hvor vedkommende er etableret, og hvorfra vedkommende udby-der sine tjenester, mì anses for en uforholdsmºssig restrikti-on og sìledes vºre ulovlige i henhold til fºllesskabsretten, nìr den pìgºldende tjeneste, som det ofte er tilfºldet for infor-mationssamfundets tjenester, leveres, uden at udbyderen nłd-vendigvis behłver at opholde sig pì den medlemsstats omrì-de, hvor tjenesten leveres.
Furthermore, the provisions of Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the « n a l p h a s e o ft h e C uffs t o m s U n i o n , which provides for the elimination of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent e . e c t b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d Tffu r k e y , a r e i n t e r p r e t e d f o r the purposes of their implementation and application to products covered by the Customs Union, in conformity with the relevant decisions of the European Court of Justice con-cerning provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 28 to 30 thereof.
Gennem udvidelsen af informationsprocedurens dºknings-omrìde til bestemmelserne vedrłrende informationssamfun-dets tjenester har direktiv 98/34/EF siden august 1999 forebyg-get indfłrelsen af nye hindringer for den frie etableringsret og fri bevºgelighed for informationssamfundets tjenester gen-nem en mekanisme til analyse af, hvorvidt nye nationale lov-givningsbestemmelser pì dette omrìde er i overensstemmelse med EF-traktatens artikel 43 og 49.
Directive 98/34/EC, by extending the scope of application of the information procedure to rules on Information Society services, ensured, since August 1999, the prevention of new barriers to the freedom of establishment and the free move-ment of Information Society services by providing a mecha-nism to analyse the compatibility of new national legislation in this « e l d w i t h A r t i c l e s 4 3 a n d 4 9 o ft h e E C T r e a t y .
I henhold til retspraksis ved De Europºiske Fºllesskabers Dom-stol krºves det i artikel 43 og 49 i traktaten, at restriktioner skal －ernes,dvs.alle•foranstaltninger, der kan begrºnse eller głre
According to the case-law of the European Court of Justice, Ar-ticles 43 and 49 of the Treaty require the elimination of restric-
Ved gennemgangen af de nationale forslag til bestemmelser vedrłrende informationssamfundets tjenester har Kommissio-nens overordnede mìlsºtning derfor vºret f.eks. › idet den er baseret pì Domstolens Sagslovgivning › at modsºtte sig et-hvert nationalt lovgivningsforslag, der har til formìl at indfłre generelle, eksterritoriale juridiske ordninger, hvor der ikke skel-nes mellem erhvervsdrivende, der er hjemmehłrende i den anmeldende medlemsstat, og erhvervsdrivende, der łnsker at
Therefore, when examining national draft rules in the « e l d o f I n f o r m a t i o n Society services, the Commission's overriding ob-jective has been, for example, basing itself on the case-law of the Court of Justice, to oppose any national regulatory ap-proach aimed at applying blanket, extra-territorial legal ar-rangements which make no distinction between operators based in the notifying Member State and those wishing to provide services in such Member State without, however, be-ing established there. The Commission has also made sure that planned national rules do not impose needless or exces-
Det skal pìpeges, at de relevante bestemmelser i aftalen om Det Europºiske Łkonomiske Samarbejdsomrìde kun vedrłrer •produkter med oprindelse i de kontraherende parter• og dermed ikke produkter, der blot markedsfłres der.
It must be pointed out that the relevant provisions of the Agreement on the European Economic Area apply only to `products originating in the Contracting Parties' and not, consequently, to products simply marketed there.
desto vigtigere, siden Domstolen i april 1996 fastslog princippet om, at manglende overholdelse af informationspligten betyder, at de pìgºldende tekniske forskrifter ikke «nderanvendelseogdermed ikke kan hìndhºves over for enkeltpersoner.
sults in the technical regulations concerned being inapplicable, so that they are unenforceable against individuals.
levere tjenester i en sìdan medlemsstat uden at vºre hjemme-hłrende der.
sive legal or administrative costs on operators and possibly on users.
For at sikre en e.ektivgennemfłrelseafdirektivetskalalleaktł-rer - nationale myndigheder, standardiseringsorganer og er-hvervsdrivende i Den Europºiske Union - have en grundig for-stìelse af direktivets bestemmelser og sìledes vºre fuldstºndig klar over deres rettigheder og forpligtelser. Dette er sì meget
In order to enable the Directive to be fully e.ective,alltheplay-ers - national authorities, standardisation bodies and the eco-nomic operators of the European Union - need to have a thor-ough understanding of its provisions and so be precisely aware of their rights and obligations.