natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Efter et kontrolbesæg i et tredjeland sendes en rapport, kontrasigneret af deltagerne i besæget, samt de bilag og andet, der kan tjene som bevisligheder, til de andre berærte medlemsstater, selv om de ikke har deltaget i kontrolbesæget (51).
Following a Community mission in a third country, a report, countersigned by those taking part in the mission, and the supporting documentation which could be used as evidence, are sent to the Member States concerned even if they have not taken part in the mission (51).
Kommissionen har udtrykt ænske om at fç at vide, om rapporterne og tilhærende bilag kunne anvendes som bevisligheder i forbindelse med en inddrivelsesprocedure ved en national jurisdiktion, u af h Ø n g i g t af om medlems-staten har deltaget i besæget eller ej.
The Commission wished to know if the reports and documentation could be used as evidence in a recovery procedure before a national court, whether the Member State took part in the mission or not.
Medlemsstaterne har svaret b e k r Ø f t en de pç dette spærgsmçl.
The Member States replied in the affirmative.
Imidlertid kan manglende underskrift pç denne rapport fra tredjelandets myn-digheders side (hvis underskrift ikke er p ç k r Ø v e t i henhold til EU-reglerne) skabe vanske-ligheder for bevisfærelsen i en procedure, der er indledt i en medlemsstat, der ikke har deltaget i besæget.
However, there may be dif-ficulties with the evidence in a recovery procedure in a Member State that has not taken part in the mission in cases where the third country has not signed the report, something which is not required by the Community regulation.
Statistikker om opfælgningen af indberettede sager.
Statistics on follow-up of cases reported.
Det er obligatorisk at indberette ad-ministrative og retslige kendelser, der er resultatet af de sager, der indberettes i henhold til forordningen (52).
Communication of the administrative and judi-cial decisions on reported cases is obligatory (52).
Dette kan skyldes, at der findes meget
Although several Member States plan to
18 i forordning (EF) nr. 515/95.I Polen er finansministeriets kontor for internationale forbindelser Kommissionens vigtigste kontakt, men toldmyndig-hederne skal ogsç kontaktes i et vist antal sager. Disse to tjenestegrene er departementer i finansministeriet.Art.
The cooperation agreements signed with India (20.10.2004) and Mexico (26.3.2001) came into force.Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 515/97.In Poland, the Bureau for International Treasury Relations is the main correspondent of the Commission, but the customs authorities must also be contacted in a certain number of cases.
2 3 lidt organiseret kriminalitet i forbindelse med o v er t r Ø de l s er af told- og landbrugsbestem-melserne, at definitionen af organiseret kriminalitet er for s n Ø v er i visse medlemsstaters retssystem, at retsmyndighederne betegner de begçede o v er t r Ø de l s er pç en anden mçde (f.eks. ¶kriminel organisation§), eller at der ikke er til s t r Ø k k e l i g t med beviser i sagen.
Only a few decisions concern organised crime. The reason for this may be the scant incidence of organised crime in customs and agricultural infringements, the restricted definition of organised crime in the legislation of certain Member States, reclassification by the judicial authority of the offences reported (for example, conspiracy), or also a lack of evidence in the case file.
Kommissionens foranstaltninger i 2004
Measures taken by the Commission in 2004
Forbedring af samarbejdet pç landbrugs-og toldomrçdet.
Stepping up cooperation in agricultural and customs matters.
Som fælge af den tematiske rapport fra GD for Budget om behandling af meddelelser om gensidig bistand (53) har
Following the thematic report of the Budget DG on the handling of mutual assistance messages (53), the Commis- sion consulted the Member States and confirmed the need to:
̋ at styrke effektiviteten i arbejdsmetoderne ved en mere moderne og hurtigere udveks-ling af oplysninger og opfælgning heraf
̋ reinforce the efficiency of working methods by faster and more modern exchange and follow-up of information;
̋ at sikre et gunstigere miljæ med hensyn til det gensidige forhold mellem de forskellige redskaber, der anvendes til opdagelse, undersægelser og retsforfælgelse (dvs. gensidig
̋ foster a better cooperative environment between the tools of detection, investigation and prosecution (articulation between mutual assistance sheets, CIS (54) and
̋ en bedre synergi mellem m ç l s Ø t n i n g er n e for de forskellige tjenestegrene i Kommissio-nen.
̋ better synergy between the respective aims of various Commission departments.
I 2004 blev der lanceret en forundersægelse for at forberede skabelse af en elektronisk be-sked ¶Gensidig bistand/meddelelse om svig§.
In 2004, a feasibility study was conducted with a view to creating an electronic message: `Mutual assistance/fraud communication'.
Udvidelse af samarbejdet til andre omrçder.
Extension of cooperation to other areas.
Den 20. juli 2004 sendte Kommissionen et forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rçdets forordning om gensidig administrativ bi-stand (56).
On 20 July 2004, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Parliament and Council regulation on mutual administrative assist-ance (56).
Den foreslçede forordning vil indeholde et mere detaljeret retsgrundlag i kampen mod svig og vil befordre samarbejdet og koordineringen pç EU-plan med Kommissionen, i s Ø r OLAF.
The proposed regulation could provide a more detailed legislative framework in the fight against fraud and encourages cooperation with and coordination by the Commission, par-ticularly OLAF.
Forslaget til forordning er af horisontal karakter; den d Ø k k er alle sektorer i b e - k Ø m p e l s en af svig i EU, som endnu ikke er genstand for sektorlovgivning, i s Ø r samarbej-det mellem medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen i kampen mod momssvig inden for EU (57), strukturfondene og de direkte udgifter.
The proposal is horizontal: it covers all the areas involved in the fight against Community fraud not yet addressed by sectoral legislation, in particular the cooperation between Member States and the Commission in the fight against intra-Community VAT fraud (57), the Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
Den vedrærer ligeledes brugen af oplysninger om m i s t Ø n k e l i g e finansielle transaktioner med henblik pç hvidvaskning af produkterne af EU-svig.
It also concerns the use of information on financial transactions suspected of involving laundering of proceeds from Community fraud.
Samarbejdet skal v Ø r e koncentreret om sager af s Ø r l i g betydning pç EU-plan, dvs. der skal v Ø r e tale om et afgiftsprovenutab pç mindst 500 000 EUR, nçr der er tale om momssvig og 100 000 EUR i andre til f Ø l de .
Cooperation should be used above all for cases of particular impor-tance for the Community, i.e. tax losses of at least EUR 500 000 in cases of VAT fraud or of EUR 100 000 in other cases.
Tematisk rapport fra 2002 om behandling af meddelelser om gensidig bistand i medlemsstaterne.Databasen ¶Toldinformationssystem§, der er forudset i konventionen af 26. juli 1995 om brug af informationstekno-logi pç toldomrçdet (EFT C 316 af 27.11.1995).
Thematic report of 2002 on the handling of mutual assistance messages in the Member States.Database `Customs information system', foreseen by the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the Use of Information Tech-nology for Customs Purposes (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995).
En ny f Ø l l e s brugerflade skulle gære det muligt at lagre en r Ø k k e oplys-ninger fra meddelelserne om gensidig bistand.Oprettelsen af fortegnelsen til identificering af sager vedrærende toldundersægelser (FIDE) er forudset i til l Ø g s p r o t o k o l - l en af 8. maj 2003 til konventionen om brug af informationsteknologi pç toldomrçdet (EFT C 139 af 13.6.2003).
A new common interface should allow the storage of a certain amount of information from the mutual assistance messages.The creation of a customs files identification database (FIDE) foreseen by the additional protocol to the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes of 8 May 2003 (OJ C 139, 13.6.2003).
For-mçlet med FIDE er at gære det muligt for de kompetente myndigheder i en medlemsstat at identificere de kompetente myndigheder i de andre medlemsstater, som undersæger eller har undersægt forholdene omkring de samme personer eller virksomheder.KOM(2004) 509 endelig.Den foreslçede forordning skal supplere Rçdets forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003 af 7. oktober 2003 (EFT L 264 af 15.10.2003), som kun vedrærer samarbejdet mellem medlemsstater og ikke mellem medlemsstaterne og Kommissio-nen.
Its objective is to allow the competent authorities of a Member State to identify the competent authorities of the other Member States who investigated the same persons or companies.COM(2004) 509 final.The aim of the proposed regulation is to supplement Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 of 7.10.2003, OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, which concerns only cooperation between Member States, and not between Member States and the Com-mission.
Kommissionen færer tilsyn med inddrivelsen af belæb, der er u r e t m Ø s s i g t udbetalt af EU som fælge af en fejl, svig eller anden form for u r e g e l m Ø s s i g h e d og desuden med o p k r Ø v - n i n g en af egne i n d t Ø g t er .
The Commission supervises the recovery of amounts unduly paid by the Communities as the result of an error, fraud or another irregularity, and the collection of own resources.
Hvad den direkte forvaltning angçr, falder inddrivelsen ind un-der Kommissionens egen kompetence.
In the areas directly managed by it, the Commission itself is responsible for recovery.
Hvad den decentraliserede forvaltning angçr, er kompetencen delt, Kommissionen fælger de inddrivelsesprocedurer, der i v Ø r k s Ø t t e s af medlemsstaterne og anvender i givet fald procedurerne for regnskabsafslutning.
In areas in which management has been decentralised, this responsibility is shared, with the Commission following the recovery procedures initiated by the Member States or else applying the clearance procedures.
I 2004 traf Kommissionen flere foranstaltninger til at forbedre inddrivelsen af egne i n d t Ø g - t er , udgifter i forbindelse med landbruget og strukturfondene samt de direkte udgifter.
In 2004, the Commission took several measures aimed at improving recovery of own resources, agricultural funds, Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
Medlemsstaterne er ansvarlige for inddrivelse af de traditionelle egne i n d t Ø g t er .
Member States are responsible for the recovery of traditional own resources.
De skal fære et ¶A-regnskab§ (58) til registrering af toldskyld, der er indbetalt og/eller stillet garanti for, og et ¶B-regnskab§ for registrering af toldskyld, der ikke er indbetalt eller stillet garanti for (eller som der er stillet garanti for, men som er omstridt).
The Member States must keep `A accounts' (58) for the registration of paid and/or guaranteed customs debts, and `B accounts' for the registration of either unpaid or not guaranteed debts (or debts guaranteed but contested).
Stærstedelen af den toldskyld, der er opfært i B-regnskabet, er et resultat af afslæringer af svig eller u r e g e l m Ø s s i g h e der .
Many debts appearing in the B accounts are the result of fraud or irregularities detected.
En rapport (59) har analyseret 17 inddrivelsessager, hvor der har v Ø r e t udsendt en medde-lelse om gensidig bistand fra OLAF, og hvor der i hvert til f Ø l de har v Ø r e t flere medlemsstater inddraget, ligesom der i hvert til f Ø l de har v Ø r e t tale om en finansiel virkning pç over 1 mio. EUR for EU's budget.
A report (59) analysed 17 cases of recovery which were the subject of previous mutual as-sistance communications from OLAF, involved several Member States and had a financial impact of over EUR 1 million on the Community budget.
De valgte sager drejede sig om forskellige goder og vedrærte forskellige svigmetoder (manipulerede t o l d v Ø r d i er , forfalskede priser og falske oprindelsesattester). Kommissionen har kunnet konstatere en konstant forbedring i den effektive inddrivelsespro-cent (2 % for det undersægte præveudsnit i 1994, 12 % i 1998 og 15 % i 2003).
The sample involved different types of asset and fraud mechanisms (false customs values, false prices and false declara-tions of origin).
Medlemsstaterne er ligeledes ansvarlige for at registrere data for alle de sager med svig og u r e g e l m Ø s s i g h e der , der afslæres i ¶OWNRES§-basen, hvis de har en potentiel finansiel virkning pç over 10 000 EUR pç de traditionelle egne i n d t Ø g t er .
Member States are also responsible for entering all cases of detected fraud and irregularities in the OWNRES database if they have a potential financial impact of traditional own resources over EUR 10 000.
Da disse sager normalt ogsç skulle fremgç af B-regnskabet, har Kommissionen foretaget en sammenligning.
Because it is to be expected that customs debts over EUR 10 000 will appear not only in OWNRES but also in the B accounts, the Commission, in 2003, compared the two.
Resultaterne var ikke s Ø r l i g t tilfredsstillende.
The results of this comparison were not very satisfactory.
Da den gentog denne sammenligning i 2004, kunne der konstateres betydelige forbedringer.
When the Commission did the exercise in 2004 significant improvements became evident.
Forordning (EF, Euratom) 2028/2004 (60) forpligter medlemsstaterne til at behandle traditionelle egne i n d t Ø g t er pç over 50 000 EUR, som ikke er inddrevet senest 5 çr efter den dato, hvor betalingsanmodningen er blevet definitivt eksigibel, som uerholdelige fordrin-ger.
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2028/2004 (60) obliges Member States to treat as irrecovera-ble amounts of traditional own resources in excess of EUR 50 000 which have not been recovered within five years from the request for payment became definitively enforceable.
Dette betyder, at disse til f Ø l de (herunder g Ø l d , der er s v Ø r at inddrive og skyldes svig og u r e g e l m Ø s s i g h e der ) skal for e l Ø g g e s Kommissionen til vurdering.
This means that all such cases (including very difficult to recover debts arising from fraud and irregularities) must be presented to the Commission for evaluation.
Den nye finansforordning (61) medfærer en betydelig forbedring af effektiviteten i inddrivelsen, nçr der er tale om direkte udgifter.
The new financial regulation (61) significantly improves the effectiveness of recovery of direct expenditure.
Der foretages herefter systematisk modregning (art. 73); modregningen foretages til et belæb svarende til EU's fordringer over for enhver debitor, der selv har en fordring over for EU, der er sikker, opgjort og forfalden til betaling.
From now on, systematic use will be made of offsetting (Article 73), whereby any claim that the Communities have on a debtor who himself has a claim on the Communities that is confirmed, quantified and due will be offset as to an equivalent amount.
Forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1150/2000, EFT L 130 af 31.5.2000.Rapport om opfælgning af traditionelle egne i n d t Ø g t er i til f Ø l de af svig og u r e g e l m Ø s s i g h e der , KOM(2004) 850 af 7.1.2005.EFT L 352 af 27.11.2004.Rçdets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 (EFT L 248 af 16.9.2002).
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000, OJ L 130, 31.5.2000.Commission report on the follow-up of traditional own resources in cases of fraud and irregularities of 7.1.2005, COM(2004) 850.OJ L 352, 27.11.2004.Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 248, 16.9.2002.
Artikel 72, stk. 2, b e k r Ø f t er ligeledes muligheden for, at institutionen kan ¶formalisere f a s tfil Ø g g e l s en af en fordring pç andre end stater ved en beslutning, der kan tvangsfuldbyr-des§.
Article 72(2) also confirms that the institution can `formally establish an amount as receiv-able from persons other than States by means of a decision which is enforceable'.
Denne mulighed eksisterer allerede i traktatens artikel 256, men der er ikke nogen gennemfærelsesforanstaltninger.
This possibility was provided for in Article 256 of the EC Treaty, but no implementing regulations had been issued.
I ævrigt indfærer den nye finansforordning den regel, at der automatisk o p k r Ø v e s mora-renter for enhver fordring, der ikke betales pç forfaldsdagen (62), og belæbet er æget bety- deligt (63
In addition, the new financial regulations introduce automatic collection of late payment interest for any debt not repaid on the due date (62), and significantly increase the amount
Kontraktgarantier for en bedre forvaltning af kontrakterne
Contractual warranties for better contract management
Udbetaling af forskud eller indræmmelse af forfinansiering uden modydelse ved udbe-talingen udgær en ikke ubetydelig risiko for EU's finansielle interesser.
Payment of advances or granting of pre-financing without consideration at the time of payment constitutes an appreciable risk for the Communities' financial interests.
Det v Ø r k t æ j er imidlertid absolut nædvendigt for gennemfærelsen af visse aktioner, der svarer til m ç l - s Ø t n i n g er n e i EU's politikker.
However, such payments are an essential tool for carrying out certain actions that meet Community policy objectives.
I den nye finansforordning, og i s Ø r forordningen om gennemfærelsesbestemmelserne, er der fastsat en r Ø k k e foranstaltninger, der mindsker denne risiko.
The new financial regulations, and in particular the regulation laying down detailed rules for its implementation, provide for a number of measures that miti-gate this risk.
Sçledes skal kontrahenterne eller modtagerne i de til f Ø l de , der er forud-set i gennemfærelsesforanstaltningerne, stille en forhçndsgaranti, fær de kan opnç en forfinansiering.
Thus, in the cases provided for by the implementing rules, the contractors or beneficiaries must provide a guarantee in advance before receiving pre-financing.
Kommissionens tjenestegrene sikrer ved h j Ø l p af standardkontraktsbestemmelser (herun-der i aftalerne med kandidatlandene og tredjelande vedrærende ekstern bistand eller delta-gelse i EU-programmer), at der indgçr effektive bestemmelser om inddrivelse.
The Commission's departments, through standard contracts or conventions (including agreements with candidate and third countries in the area of foreign aid or participation in Community programmes), ensure that effective provisions on recovery are included.
Inddrivelse ved i n d t r Ø de n som civil part og sikrende retsmidler i medlemsstaternes lovgivninger
Recovery by joining a civil action to criminal proceedings and precautionary measures under Member States' legislation
Den undersægelse, der blev offentliggjort i beretningen for sidste çr (64), viste, at Kommissionen i de fleste medlemsstater kan o p t r Ø de i civile sægsmçl med henblik pç at fç erstat-ning med renter for at sikre inddrivelse af EU's tilgodehavender i forbindelse med de direkte udgifter.
The study published in last year's report (64) showed that, in the majority of Member States, the Commission is entitled to join a civil action to ongoing criminal proceedings with a view to obtaining damage to secure recovery of Community entitlements related to direct expenditure.
At o p t r Ø de i et civilt sægsmçl i forbindelse med en strafferetsprocedure betragtes som et effektivt instrument til at gære det lettere for Kommissionen at inddrive g Ø l d pç omrçdet for direkte udgifter.
Launching a civil action within criminal proceedings is considered an effec-tive instrument to facilitate the Commission's efforts to recover debts in the field of direct expenditure.
Der er flere fordele forbundet hermed, bl.a. en af-kortning af procedurefristerne.
It offers several advantages, including the shortening of legal proceedings.
I de medlemsstater, der har et common law-system (65), har Kommissionen, selv om den ikke kan o p t r Ø de i et civilt sægsmçl, dog mulighed for at k r Ø v e kompensation.
In Member States having common law systems (65), although the Commission would not be entitled to launch `civil action within criminal proceedings', it would nevertheless be allowed to make a request for a compensation order.
I beretningen fra 2003 blev det ligeledes fastslçet, at Kommissionen som generel regel kan anmode om sikrende retsmidler (66) fra det æjeblik, undersægelsesfasen i strafferetsproce- duren begynder.
The 2003 report also established that the Commission may usually apply for precautionary measures (66) as from the investigation phase of criminal proceedings.
Kommissionens forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 2342/2002 om gennemfærelsesbestemmelser til Rçdets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002, EFT L 357 af 31.12.2002, artikel 86.Den g Ø l de n de rentesats er Den E u r o p Ø i s k e Centralbanks referencesats foræget med 7 procentpoint i forbindelse med offentlige kontrakter om tjenesteydelser og leverancer, og 3,5 procentpoint i andre til f Ø l de .
Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, Article 86.The rate of late payment interest applicable is the reference rate of the European Central Bank plus 7 percentage points for service and supply contracts and the reference rate plus 3.5 percentage points in other cases.
Der er tale om en m Ø r k b a r stigning i forhold til den tidligere sats, som svarede til referencesatsen foræget med 1,5 %.KOM(2004) 573.Irland og Det Forenede Kongerige.Anklagemyndigheden eller en dommer kan beordre sikrende retsmidler for at forhindre, at den tiltalte kan formæble sine aktiver fær domstolens kendelse.
This is a significant increase with respect to the previous rate (the reference rate plus 1.5 percentage points).COM(2004) 573.Ireland, United Kingdom.
De omfatter b e s l a g l Ø g g e l s e og indefrysning af formuegoder tilhærende den per-son, hvis forhold undersæges.
Precautionary measures are those measures which the prosecutor or the court may order to prevent the defendant from dispersing his assets before the court reaches its decision.
2 medlemsstater har ikke v Ø r e t i stand til at give et svar pç denne del af spærgeskemaet (67).
Two Member States were not able to provide answers to this part of the questionnaire (67).
Alle svar kan ses i Kommissionens arbejdsdokument.
The full text of the responses is available in the form of a Commission services' working document.
Selv om der er ligheder, er der i de forskellige nationale retssystemer meget forskellige betingelser for, hvornçr Kommissionen kan indlede et civilt sægsmçl.
Although certain common trends can be identified, the national legal systems provide for very different conditions under which the Commission's application for civil action can be launched.
Dette viser, at det er nædvendigt for Kommissionen at samarbejde s n Ø v er t med retsmyndighederne.
This highlights the need for the Commission to have close cooperation with national judicial authorities.
Beretnin-gen fra 2004 gjorde det ligeledes muligt for Kommissionen at fç et bedre kendskab til, hvilke betingelser der k r Ø v e s i de nationale lovgivninger for at f r e m s Ø t t e en anmodning om sikrende retsmidler.
The 2004 report also gives the Commission a better under-standing of the conditions under which applications for precautionary measures should be made following national legislations.
Anmodning om at blive part i et civilt sægsmçl.
The application for `civil action within criminal proceedings'.
I de fleste medlemsstater skal det v Ø r e Kommissionen selv, der stçr bag anmodningen.
The majority of Member States' answers show that the claim must be filed by the Commission.
I Sverige for e l Ø g g e s anmodningen altid af anklagemyndigheden.
In Sweden, the prosecutor is entitled to submit the claim.
I Finland og Portugal kan anklagemyndighe-den s Ø t t e sçdan en sag i gang, hvis det skænnes h en s i g t s m Ø s s i g t .
In Finland and Portugal, it can be made by the prosecutor if he considers it appropriate.
I sç til f Ø l de er det ikke nædvendigt, at Kommissionen for e l Ø g g er en anmodning.
In this case, there will be no need for the Commission to make an application.