natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det tºtte samarbejde mellem CEN, CENELEC og ETSI formalise-res pì hłjeste niveau af en politisk struktur, der er fºlles for de tre organer. •The Joint Presidents Group• (JPG), som har ansvaret for at sikre, at overlappende kompetenceomrìder administre-res sì e.ektivtsommuligt.JPG,derbestìrafendelegationafadministratorer og generalsekretºrer fra hvert af de europºi-ske standardiseringsorganer, udarbejder til dette formìl aftaler vedrłrende fºlles problemer.
The close co-operation between CEN, CENELEC and ETSI is for-malised at the highest level by a policy structure common to the three bodies: `The Joint Presidents Group' (JPG), which is re-sponsible for ensuring the most e/cientadministrationpossi-ble of the areas of overlapping competence. The JPG, which is composed of a delegation of the administrators and secretar-ies-general of each of the European standardisation bodies, prepares for this purpose agreements relating to common problems.
ETSI's arbejde « n a n s i e r effs d e l v i s t a f EffU o g EF T A i fo r b i n d e l s effm e d mandater til udarbejdelse af standarder til stłtte for EU's politikker. Andre ressourcer kommer fra medlemskontingenter, bidrag fra de nationale telekommunikationsmyndigheder og et lille belłb fra salg af standarder.
The work of ETSI is « n a n c e d i n p a r t b y t h e E C a n d E FT A i n t h e c o n t e x t of mandated work for the preparation of standards in support of Community policies.
ETSI's primºre fokus for standarderne er naturligvis Europa, men gennem sin internati-onale medlemskreds (selv de ‹esteafdeeuropºiskemedlem-mer er globale aktłrer) słger instituttet at udvikle standarder til anvendelse i hele verden.
ETSI's primary focus for its stand-ards is Europe, naturally, but with a truly international mem-bership (even most of its European members are global play-ers), the Institute seeks to develop standards for world-wide application.
Det var i denne sammenhºng, at der blev indgìet en aftale om opgavefordeling i forbindelse med standardiseringen af elektriske kłretłjer: CENELEC «kansvaretforatudarbejdestandarderforkł-retłjer, der er tilsluttet el-nettet, mens CEN har ansvaret for stan-darder for kłretłjer, der er uafhºngige af nettet.
It was in this context that an agreement was concluded on the division of tasks for standardisation of electrical vehicles: CENELEC was given responsibility for preparing standards for vehicles connected to the electricity network, whilst CEN is re-sponsible for standards for vehicles independent of the net-work.
Samarbejdet mellem CENELEC og ETSI er baseret pì et sºt retningslinjer, der har til formìl at lłse problemer med de overlappende ansvarsom-rìder og undgì dobbeltarbejde. Vedtagelsen af CENELEC/ETSI-standardiseringsprogrammet for udviklingen af harmoniserede standarder, som skal sikre elektromagnetisk kompatibilitet pì te-lekommunikationsomrìdet, er et andet eksempel pì den slags samarbejde, der skal udvides, eftersom standardiseringsprogram-merne i stigende grad vil forudsºtte deltagelse af to eller endog tre europºiske standardiseringsorganer.
Furthermore, the co-operation between CENELEC and ETSI is based on a set of guidelines designed to resolve the dif-«cultiesinherentintheoverlappingofresponsibilitiesandavoid duplication offfe . o r t .
CEN's, CENELEC's og ETSI's funktioner er ganske vist klart de«-nerede, men det kan ikke undgìs, at der er en vis overlapning pì en rºkke omrìder sìsom maskinsektoren eller ikt-sekto-ren, der be«ndersigikrydsfeltetmelleminformationstekno-logi, elektroniske komponenter og telekommunikationsnet-vºrk.
Although they are precisely d e « n e d , t h e fu n c t i o n s o f C E N , C E N E L E C and ETSI inevitably overlap in a number of «elds,suchas the machinery sector or the sector of information and com-munications technology (ICT), which is situated at the cross-roads between information technology, electronic compo-nents and telecommunications networks.
Det er derfor vigtigt at koordinere de tre organers arbejde.
Co-ordination of the work of these three bodies is therefore essential.
Det sker hovedsagelig gennem ICT Standards Board, som er ìbent for alle erhvervsdrivende.
This is mainly done through the ICT Standards Board, which is open to economic operators.
Dette organ blev etableret i 1995 og skal koordinere arbejdet og identi«ceremarkedskrav.Organet gennemgìr derfor kravene i standardiseringsanmod-ninger, som navnlig kommer fra •Industry High Level Strategy Group• og Europa-Kommissionen, hvorefter de indsºttes i sam-
It was set up in 1995 to coordi-nate the work and identify market requirements. In order to do
De nationale standardiseringsorganer, der nºvnes i bilag II i di-rektivet, er de institutioner i de forskellige medlemsstater, der har ansvar for at udarbejde og o.entliggłrestandarderiover-ensstemmelse med en procedure, som głr det muligt for alle berłrte łkonomiske og sociale operatłrer at deltage i arbejdet pì et frivilligt grundlag. Deres opgaver er derfor ofte af gene-rel karakter.
The national standardisation bodies referred to in Annex II to the Directive are the institutions in the various Member States which are responsible for preparing and publishing standards, in accordance with a procedure which allows all economic and
Organerne er med enkelte undtagelser meget ens, for sì vidt angìr deres sammensºtning, organer og arbejdsmetoder.
These bodies are, with one or two exceptions, very similar in terms of their constitution, their organs and their operating methods.
I det ‹estetilfºldeerdetcentraliseredeorganeri form af sammenslutninger, der stłttes af de o.entligemyndigheder,og som anvender de nationale standarder som referencedoku-menter i speci«kationerfortildelingafo.entligekontrakterel-ler til udarbejdelse af tekniske forskrifter pì nationalt plan.
They are, in most cases, centralised bodies in the form of as-sociations supported by the public authorities, which use the national standards as reference documents in speci«cationsforthe award of public contracts or for the preparation of national technical regulations.
- Graden af inddragelse af det nationale standardiseringsor-gan i tilrettelºggelsen af CEN's eller CENELEC's tekniske ar-bejde.
› the degree of involvement of the national standardisation body in the organisation of the technical work of CEN or CENELEC;
- Organets stłrrelse.
› the size of the body.
Disse institutioner stłttes af organer, der normalt er decentrali-serede og sikrer den nłdvendige konsensus mellem de łkono-miske og sociale partnere, nemlig tekniske sektorudvalg bestì-ende af ubetalte eksperter, som erhvervslivet stiller til rìdighed med henblik pì at udarbejde standarder om emner pì arbejds-programmet, organer, der yder logistikstłtte og skaber kon-sensus gennem et system med o.entligehłringersamtorga-ner, der o.entliggłrogsºlgerdevedtagnestandarder.
These institutes have the support of bodies which are normally decentralised and ensure the necessary consensus between the economic and social partners, namely sectoral technical committees composed of unpaid experts provided mainly by industry to prepare standards on subjects in the work pro-gramme; bodies providing logistical support and bringing about a consensus through a system of public enquiry; and bodies which publish and sell the standards adopted.
Ved fastlºggelsen af begrebet •teknisk forskrift• indeholder stykke 11 oplysninger om teksttyper, der skal anmeldes under proceduren for fremsendelse af information pì dette omrìde i henhold til direktivet.
11) `technical regulation', technical speci«cationsandotherre-quirements, or rules on services, including the relevant adminis-trative provisions, the observance of which is compulsory, de jure or de facto, in the case of marketing, provision of a service, estab-lishment of a service operator or use in a Member State or a major part thereof, as well as laws, regulations or administrative provi-sions of Member States, except those provided for in Article 10, prohibiting the manufacture, importation, marketing or use of a product or prohibiting the provision or use of a service, or estab-lishment as a service provider.
I USA og Canada derimod pìhviler o.entliggłrelsenafstandarderadskilligehundredeforskelligespecialorganisationerfordeenkeltesektorer.
In the United States and Canada, on the other hand, the publication of standards is the responsibility of several hundred specialist organisations, each in a speci«csector.
Stk. 11 indeholder tre eksempler pì de vigtigste og hyppigst forekommende faktiske tekniske forskrifter, hvori man prºcise-rer et begreb, som ikke var fastlagt i den oprindelige udgave af direktivet og gav anledning til forskellige fortolkninger, der var til skade for en korrekt gennemfłrelse af informationsproceduren.
1. de jure, when compliance with them is made compulsory by a measure emanating directly from the relevant public au-thorities or attributable to the latter.
Nogle tekniske speci«kationer,et•andetkrav•ellerforskriftervedrłrende tjenester, der kan de«neressomtekniskeforskrif-ter, er udelukket fra direktivets anvendelsesomrìde, navnlig hvis de overholder bindende EU-lovgivning eller er begrºnset til gennemfłrelsen af en dom afsagt af Domstolen som fastlagt i direktivets artikel 10.
2. de facto, where the technical specification is not laid down by a formal and binding act of the State concerned, but where the State encourages its observance.
En teknisk speci«kationelleret•andetkrav•ellerenforskriftvedrłrende tjenester kan fì bindende karakter pì to mìder:
As a result of the similar effects which they may have upon trade, these measures are considered equivalent to binding regula-tions.
Som det fremgìr af direktivets artikel 7, stk. 2, kan overholdelse af en standard głres obligatorisk i visse tilfºlde, sìledes at den dermed fìr status af en •teknisk forskrift•.
These measures, as with all technical regulations, must be n o t i « e d u n d e r t h e D i r e c t i v e w h e n t h e y e m a n a t e f r o m t h e c e n t r a l governments of the Member States or from one of their authorities as s p e c i « e d i n t h e l i s t d r a w n up b y t h e C o m - m i s s i o n in the framework of the Standing Committee of the Directive.
I henhold til de«nitionenidirektivetsartikel1,stk.3,og4,somforklaretovenfor.
We shall see later, under Article 7(2) of the Directive that, in certain cases, compliance with the standard may become mandatory, so that it then acquires the status of a `technical regulation'.
holdt, da det giver en formodning om, at produktet eller tjenesteydelsen overholder bestemmelserne i fłrnºvnte for-anstaltninger.
De facto technical regulations include: ing to their origin in the private sector.
Staten skal inddrages i disse aftaler, hvis de skal vºre omfattet af direktiv 98/34/EF.
They are nevertheless considered to be de facto technical regulations when the State is a signatory party to one of these agreements.
Det er f.eks. tilfºldet, hvis en lov vedrłrende forsikringer frita-ger brugere af produkter, der overholder visse ikke-obligatori-ske standarder, fra ansvaret for at bevise overholdelse af obli-gatoriske krav, eftersom det antages, at disse produkter er i overensstemmelse med kravene.
› laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a Member State which refer either to technical speci«cationsortootherre-quirements or to rules on services, or to professional codes or codes of practice which in turn refer to technical speci«cationsorotherrequirements or to rules on services, compliance with which con-fers a presumption of conformity with the obligations imposed by the aforementioned laws, regulations or administrative provi-sions;
- frivillige aftaler, som de o.entligemyndighedererkontraheren-de part i, og som af hensyn til almenvellet tager sigte pì at opfylde tekniske speci«kationerellerandrekravellerforskriftervedrłrende tjenester, bortset fra udbudsbetingelser i forbindelse med o.entli-ge indkłbsaftaler
This circumstance is becoming increasingly frequent, since such agreements have become instruments of national regu-latory policy.
De skattemºssige eller «nansielleforanstaltninger,derernºvnt i denne artikel, fastlºgges af de nationale o.entligemyndigheder med et andet formìl end det, som medlemssta-terne traditionelt forfłlger med deres skattepolitik.
In the « e l d o f I n f o r m a t i o n S o c i e t y s e r v i c e s , a n o t i « e d t e x t - a d r a ft C o d e o f P r a c t i c e o n v o l u n t a r y r e t e n t i o n o f communication data- provides a good example of such voluntary agreement.
Aftaler mellem erhvervsdrivende, som fastlºgger tekniske spe-ci«kationerellerandrekravforbestemteprodukterellerfor-skrifter vedrłrende tjenester, er ikke bindende som sìdan, fordi de har deres oprindelse i den private sektor. De betragtes ikke desto mindre som faktiske tekniske forskrifter, nìr staten er un-derskrivende part i en af disse aftaler.
The laws, regulations or administrative provisions referred to are measures adopted by the national authorities which refer to technical speci«cationsor`otherrequirements' or to rules on servicesusually laid down by bodies other than the State (by a national standardisation body, for example), which are not compulsory as such (standards, professional codes or codes of practice), but observance of which is encouraged since it confers on the product or the service a presumption of con-formity with the provisions of the aforementioned measures.
Denne situation forekommer stedse oftere, da disse aftaler er blevet et vºrktłj i den nationale reguleringspolitik.
The State must be involved in these agreements if they are to fall within the scope of Directive 98/34/EC.
Det kan f.eks. vºre for at redu-cere kłretłjers forurenende emissioner, udledning af farlige stoffer i vand eller anvendelse af bestemte typer emballage. For sì vidt angìr informationssamfundet, er en anmeldt tekst - et udkast til en kodeks for god praksis om frivillig op-bevaring af kommunikationsdata - et godt eksempel pì en sìdan frivillig aftale.
For the public au-thority to be able to ful«ltheinformationobligationincum-bent on it and take account of comments by the Commission or a Member State in the framework of the information proce-dure laid down by the Directive, the State must be a contract-ing party.
Denne bestemmelse i direktivet blev indfłrt pì grund af visse tilfºlde af skatteincitamenter til •rene kłretłjer•, der opfyldte bestemte emissionsgrºnser eller var udstyret med katalysato-rer.
› voluntary agreements to which a public authority is a con-tracting party and which provide, in the general interest, for compliance with technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsor rules on services, excluding public procurement tender speci«-cations.
Den pìgºldende kategori af foranstaltninger omfatter navn-lig foranstaltninger, der sigter mod at tilskynde til anska.elseaf produkter, der opfylder bestemte speci«kationer,gennem
› technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsorrulesonserv-ices which are linked to «scalor«nancialmeasuresa.ectingtheconsumption of products or services by encouraging compliance with such technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsorruleson services; technical speci«cationsorotherrequirementsorrules on services linked to national social security systems are not included.
adgang til «nansieringsforanstaltninger(f.eks.stłttetilkłbafbestemte opvarmningsanordninger, der overholder fastlagte tekniske krav) eller alternativt afskrºkke fra at kłbe dem (f.eks. ingen stłtte til byggeindustrien, hvis der anvendes ma-terialer med bestemte egenskaber).
Directive 98/34/EC does not cover the whole of the «scalor«-nancial legislation of the Member States; it only refers to tech-nical speci«cationsor`otherrequirements'orrulesonserviceslinked to «scalor«nancialmeasureswhichhavetheobjectiveof changing the behaviour of consumers or service recipients.
Den omfatter ogsì skat-temºssige eller «nansielleforanstaltninger,somkanindvirkepì forbruget.
The «scalor«nancialmeasuredoesnot,assuch,formthesub-ject of examination by the Commission or the Member States.
Foranstaltninger i tilknytning til nationale socialsikringssyste-mer er ogsì udelukket (f.eks. lovgivning, der głr refusion af et lºgemiddel betinget af en bestemt slags emballage).
Only that aspect of the technical speci«cations,of`otherre-quirements' or of rules on services which may form barriers to trade is examined.
Den sidste type af tekniske regulativer, som direktivet sigter imod, og som skulle anmeldes (foruden tekniske speci«katio-ner, §andre krav‚ og regler om tjenesteydelser, som pìbyder retlige og faktiske obligatoriske krav), bestìr af nationale love, regulativer og administrative bestemmelser, der sigter mod at forbyde fremstilling, import, markedsfłring og brug af et pro-dukt, eller som forbyder levering eller anvendelse af en tjene-ste eller etablering som tjenesteyder.
It should be emphasised that this provision of the Directive does not cover the «scalor«nancialmeasurescarriedoutinsupport of certain enterprises or products, pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty, relating to State aid, which form the subject of the speci«cprocedurestipulatedbythelatter.
Der tilskyndes til overholdelse af •andre krav• som omhandlet i direktivet (f.eks. fritagelse for miljłafgifter pì emballage til be-stemte produkter, hvis der er indfłrt et pant- og retursystem eller fritagelse for miljłafgift for bestemte produkter, hvis der er indfłrt et indsamlings- og genbrugssystem).
This provision of the Directive came about because of certain cases of tax incentives granted to `clean vehicles' which met certain emission limits or were equipped with catalytic con-verters.
Pì samme mìde vedrłrer denne kategori foranstaltninger, der sigter mod at tilskynde til eller afskrºkke fra kłb af tjenester med bestem-te egenskaber (f.eks. tjenester, der modtages via speci«kkean-ordninger eller kommer fra operatłrer, der er etableret i be-stemte omrìder).
Experience has shown that Member States often linked incentives to conditions, with the result that the system intro-duced was contrary to Community law. It became clear that there was a need to examine such drafts.
For at vºre omfattet af denne －erdekategoriaftekniskefor-skrifter vedrłrende bl.a. forbud mod anvendelse skal foran-staltningerne have et anvendelsesomrìde, der rºkker langt ud over en begrºnsning af bestemte anvendelsesmuligheder for de pìgºldende produkter eller tjenester, og mì ikke alene vedrłre en begrºnsning af deres anvendelse.
Measures connected with the national social security systems are also excluded (for example the regulation which makes the refund of a medicine conditional on a certain type of packaging).
Den kategori af tekniske forskrifter skal navnlig dºkke nationale foranstaltnin-ger, der ikke giver mulighed for, at det pìgºldende produkt kan anvendes pì en mìde, som det med rimelighed kunne for-ventes anvendt til, men derimod kun for rent marginale former for anvendelse.
The last type of technical regulation contemplated by the directive which should be notified (in addition to technical specifications, `other requirements' and rules on services which impose de jure and de facto compulsory require-ments) consist of national laws, regulations and administra-tive provisions intended to prohibit the manufacture, im-portation, marketing and use of a product or prohibiting the provision or use of a service or the establishment as a service provider.
Sìdanne forbud udgłr sì at sige en teknisk forskrift i sin ulti-mative form. Medmindre de kan begrundes i henhold til trakta-tens artikel 30 eller 46 eller anses som forholdsmºssige i rela-tion til vºsentlige krav i henhold til Domstolens retspraksis,
To fall within this fourth category of technical regulation con-cerning a prohibition inter alia on use, the measures must have a scope which goes well beyond a limitation to certain possible uses of the product or the service in question and must not be con«nedtoamererestrictionoftheiruse.Thatcategory of technical regulation is particularly intended to cover national measures which leave no room for any use
Kun det aspekt af de tekniske speci«kationer,af•andrekrav• eller af forskrifterne vedrłrende tjenester, der udgłr en handelshindring, kontrolleres.
Similarly this category of measures concern those aiming at encouraging or discouraging the purchase of services having certain features (e.g. services re-ceived via specific devices or originating from operators es-tablished in certain areas).
udgłr de hindringer for varers og tjenesters frie bevºgelighed og den frie etableringsret i EU.
which can reasonably be made of the product concerned oth-er than a purely marginal one.
terne efter gennemgangen af de udkast, de har modtaget, an-mode den lovgivende myndighed om at ºndre en tekst, der betragtes som vºrende i strid med bestemmelserne for det in-dre marked.
The procedure for the provision of information laid down by the Directive in the field of technical regulations pro-vides that, on completion of the examination of drafts which it has been sent, the Commission and the Member States can request the regulatory authority to amend any text which is considered to be contrary to the rules of the inter-nal market.
Omfattet er tekniske forskrifter, der fastsºttes af de af medlems-staterne udpegede myndigheder, og som er opfłrt pì en liste, der skal udarbejdes af Kommissionen inden den 5. august 1999 inden for rammerne af det i artikel 5 omhandlede udvalg.
Unless they can be ju s t i « e d u n d e r A r t i c l e 3 0 or Article 46 of the Treaty or proportionate in relation to es-sential requirements within the terms of the case law of the Court of Justice, they constitute barriers par excellence to the free movement of goods and services and to the freedom of establishment within the Community.
Det er medlemsstaterne, der i overensstemmelse med deres lovgivningsproces beslutter, hvornìr i processen udkastet til teknisk forskrift skal sendes til Kommissionen, nìr blot det sta-dig er muligt at foretage vºsentlige ºndringer.
It is a matter for each Member State to decide, in accordance with the nature of its legislative process, the stage at which its draft technical regulations should be sent to the Commission, as long as it is still possible to make substantial amendments.
Listen ºndres efter samme procedure.
The same procedure shall be used for amending this list;
Direktivet gºlder ikke foranstaltninger, som medlemsstaterne an-ser for nłdvendige inden for rammerne af traktaten for at sikre beskyttelsen af personer og navnlig arbejdstagere under anven-delsen af produkterne, sìfremt foranstaltningerne ikke berłrer produkterne.
This Directive shall not apply to those measures Member States consider necessary under the Treaty for the protection of persons, in particular workers, when products are used, provided that such measures do not a.ecttheproducts.
Almindeligvis medtages hele den europºiske standard i sºt af nationale standarder.
Identical transposition means that the national standard in-cludes or refers in extenso the text of the international or Euro-pean standard.
Kommissionen og de i bilag I og II omhandlede standardise-ringsorganer underrettes om, for hvilke nye emner de i bilag II nºvnte nationale organer ved opfłrelse pì deres standardise-ringsprogram har besluttet at fastsºtte eller ºndre en standard, undtagen hvis det drejer sig om identisk eller ºkvivalent gengi-velse af en international eller europºisk standard.
The Commission and the standardisation bodies referred to in Annexes I and II shall be informed of the new subjects for which the national bodies referred to in Annex II have decided, by includ-ing them in their standards programme, to prepare or amend a standard, unless it is an identical or equivalent transposition of an international or European standard.
Det sker i form af ìrlige kontrakter indgìet med Kommissionen og EFTA-sekretariatet.
In practice, the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandardsbeganon1January1985.