natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg vil hæfte mig ved to væsentlige punkter: De franske krav med hensyn tü Kommissionens roUe i EØF og reglen om kvaUficeret flertal ved afstemningerne i Rådet.
I would say, with no desire to offend anyone, that this would be an agreement but certainly not a gentleman's agree ment.
Hvad angår Kommissionen, har vi efter det, vi har kunnet læse i aviserne (hvUket for øvrigt ikke er dementeret), indtryk af, at den skal være en slags syndebuk i de meningsforskelle, der er meUem Frankrig og de fem andre partnere.
Others who have also done well (and I would particularly like to congratulate Mr. Spaak, who is present today) are those who have fought with such intelligence, enthusiasm and creativity to find formulas which may possibly satisfy the French government without compromising the provisions of the Treaty of Rome.
Det kan være, at nogle af de ulemper, man har beklaget, er begrundede.
The three points of the so-called 'Spaak Plan' (we know it under this name because it has been presented in this way in the press) contain, I believe, some positive factors.
Det havde Været mere retfærdigt og mere naturUgt, hvis der havde været en åben diskussion meUem Ministerrådet og Kommissionen i EØF.
Long experience has already taught us that, during strikes by the public services, legal sanctions are never applied.
Men at viUe dømme Kommissionen, der ikke er tü stede, og nægte den ret tU at forsvare sig, det er - undskyld mig - en uhyrUghed.
I am therefore unable to see why one should this time apply sanctions which would consist precisely of a majority vote on issues which should have been settled unanimously in 1965.
Jeg vil gerne i den forbindelse spørge Ministerrådenes formænd, om det er rigtigt eller ej, at man har krævet en slags permanent ustabilitet med hensyn til funktionerne for Kommissionens formand i EØF.
As far as the third point is concerned, I share some of the concerns expressed by the previous speaker. This system of three readings disturbs the equilibrium of legislative procedure under the Treaty of Rome.
Det andet spørgsmål er følgende: Er det rig tigt eUer ikke rigtigt, at man har krævet fuldstændig udskiftning af Kommissionen i EØF, en udskiftning af aUe dens medlemmer?
The Commission makes the proposal, the Parliament gives an opinion and the Council reaches a decision.
Parlamentet har flere gange haft lejlighed til at under strege den ekstraordinære dygtighed hos Kommissionen i EØF, der med sin kompetence, sin initiativrigdom og sin dynamik har lagt grunden til den fantastiske udvikling i FæUesmarkedet, som har hele verdens bevågenhed og beundring.
Therefore if it is always the case, as it should be, that the Parliament's opinion is requested before the Commission proposal is submitted to the Council, it is clear that when the Commission is subsequently called upon by the Council to amend its proposal for the second reading and then again for the third reading, the opinion expressed by the Parliament would lose all significance.
Disse mennesker, Walter Hallstein og hans medarbejdere, der virkeUg har fortjent Europa, kan ikke ydmyges sådan nu.
This opinion would relate to the initial proposal but would have no relationship whatsoever with the second or the third proposal.
Men jeg vil sige åbent, at det, der bekymrer os mest, er, at man ved at benytte sig af denne lejlighed tU ikke at fortælle om dette påskud vU ændre Kommissionens roUe. Man vil med andre ord omdanne den fra en politisk institution tU en teknisk institution.
I would then put this question to the President of the Council of Ministers.
Kommissionen i EØF er en politisk institution i FæUesskabet, traktaten er formel på dette punkt, da den er ansvarUg over for Europa-Parlamentet, som med egnede procedurer automatisk kan fremkalde dens afgang ved et forslag om mistiUidsvotum.
I am well aware that it has some times happened and still does happen that the Parliament is not consulted when the Commission amends its proposal after discussion within the Council.
I henhold til selve traktaten er den således en politisk institution og ikke en teknisk.
We have found and are still finding this procedure deplorable and consider it to be contrary to the spirit of the Treaty of Rome.
Man kan da ikke forestiUe sig, at Ministerrådet uden endog at benytte den procedure, der er fastlagt til en ændring af traktaten, har i sinde med overlæg at ændre Kommissionens rolle.
To institutionalise such a practice would form an unquestionable betrayal of the spirit and the letter of that Treaty.
Det andet spørgsmål, der bekymrer os i den henseende, er følgende: Lad os antage, at det er
It seems to me that Parliament was notably absent from this two day discussion in Luxembourg.
Der er kun en løsning - og det er den, der bekymrer os - nemlig at man ved hjælp af en reorganisation af Kommissionen tU sidst fjerner den fortrinsret fra Parlamentet, der er bestemt i Rom-traktaterne: Udøvelse af en politisk kontrol af det eksekutive organs aktivitet.
I hope that during subsequent meetings, the Ministers here today will have an opportunity of taking this comment into account and coming to the defence of the European Parliament.
Lad os gå over til det andet punkt: kvaUficeret flertal tU Ministerrådets afgørelser.
We are aware of the gravity of the European crisis affecting our Community.
I den for bindelse vil jeg gerne helt roligt give udtryk for min personUge mening.
We are aware of the already unfortunate effects of this crisis.
Det er altid reglen om kompromis, der bUver anvendt, og det er normalt.
Our sympathy goes more specifically to the Atomic Energy Community.
Der vU nødvendigvis ske det, der sædvanligvis sker i Det Schweiziske Forbundsråd, hvor Forfatningen bestemmer flertal til beslutninger, men hvor man i virkeligheden aldrig træffer flertalsbeslutninger, da beslutningerne altid træffes enstemmigt på grundlag af et kompromis.
By way of digression I would say that this is, to my mind, the most flagrant proof that the failure to reach agreement on the common agricultural policy on 30 June was nothing other than an opportunity — if not a pretext — for a crisis which in fact has far deeper and more serious roots.
Men det skal tilføjes, at man kan ikke acceptere, at den regel, der er bestemt i traktaten om kvalificeret flertal, ophæves.
At the present time, the European Atomic Energy Community is in the situation of not being able to apply the current system of provisional twelfths allowed for other budgets to its research budget and is therefore totally unable to meet its commitments.
Reglen skal eksistere, fordi den er der tü at få den, der med sit veto ønsker at forhindre gennemførelsen af visse regler eUer hindre udviklingen af den igangværende enhedsproces, tU at opgive det.
It has obligations it cannot fulfil and I believe that this problem should be referred urgently to the Council of Ministers in order that a remedy can be found.
Det er hensigtsmæssigt, at denne regel er der for at advare om, at det ikke er muUgt bare med et veto at forhindre, at man går videre fremad.
We are aware of the serious nature of this crisis and we believe that everything possible should be done, examining all ideas and all solutions, to reach agreement.
Det er den væsentlige funktion ved denne regel: en slags deterrent, et afskrækkelsesvåben, som ingen har til hensigt at benytte sig af, men som aUe gerne vil have tU rådighed for at afskrække eventuelle aggressorer.
This should be done in the hope that in the spirit of conciliation now becoming apparent in all the governments of the Community's member countries, we may find a formula to put the Community back on its rightful path.
Men det viUe navnlig være en uhyrlighed at kræve, at denne regel skulle ophæves ved hjælp af det, man efter min mening upassende har kaldt en gentlemans agreement.
I believe that your efforts as representatives of the Council of Ministers, will be strongly supported by the entire European Parliament, but only as long as the principles of the Treaties of Rome are faithfully followed.
Men hvordan?
We are sure that you will try to respect your commitments.
Man ønsker ved et kneb, næsten i smug, at ændre Rom-traktaten ved at undgå vanskeligheden med den parlamentariske procedure for at forhindre en diskussion ved ratificeringen i de nationale parlamenter.
But it must not be forgotten that the structure of the Treaties of Rome forms the only safeguard against betrayal of the final objective of the unification process.
Må det være mig tilladt at sige, og jeg ønsker ikke at fornærme nogen, at det viUe være en agreement, men sandeUg ikke en gentlemans agreement.
Our fear is that in the anxious search for a solution to the serious crisis affecting this process, we might finally give way to the temptation to amend something defacto which it seems can not be justly amended dejure. jure.
De, der har modsat sig dette krav fra den franske regering, har derfor handlet rigtigt, hvis det er sandt, at dette forslag er stillet.
Therefore, the European Parliament's formal appeal to you, as representatives of the Council of Ministers, is to grant no concessions and show no weakness.
De, der har kæmpet (og jeg vU gerne specielt takke Paul Henri Spaak, der er tü stede her) så klogt, ivrigt og opfindsomt for at finde formler, der eventuelt kan
Perhaps, during your difficult task, you may find comfort, support and encouragement William of Orange's words: It is not necessary to hope in order to begin, it is not necessary to succeed in order to persevere.
til Atomenergifællesskabet.
European Scientific Research
Det har intet haft at gøre med problemet med den fæUes land brugspolitik, og dets Kommission har ikke været udsat for kritik fra visse personer, og alligevel har det lidt mest under krisen den 30. juni.
I would firstly like to thank you most sincerely for your congratulations, as spokesman for all our colleagues, on my recent appointment as Rector of the University of Rome.
I parentes bemærket forekommer det mig at være det mest åbenbare bevis på, at den manglende enighed om den fæUes landbrugspolitik den 30. juni ikke var andet end anledningen - jeg vil ikke sige påskuddet - til en krise, der i virkeligheden har dybere og alvorlige rødder.
In this connection, I would like to assure you that despite the responsibility, importance and weight of the new duties which have been added to my already considerable workload, I shall continue to make my modest contribution to our common ideal, the construction of Europe.
For øjebUkket er situationen den, at Det Europæiske Atomenergifællesskab ikke tU sit forskningsbudget kan anvende systemet med foreløbige tolvtedele, der gælder for de andre budgetter, og det er derfor umuligt for det at opfylde sine forpligtelser.
A good deal of time has passed since 28 April and I was tempted to withdraw the question I raised since it has lost a good deal of its relevance, particularly in view of the fact Mr. Chatenet wrote me a very courteous letter, for which I would like to thank him once again, saying that he had only intended to express personal ideas in his interview.
Det har nogle forpUgtelser, som det ikke kan opfylde, og jeg mener, at Ministerrådet hurtigst muligt skal gøres opmærksom på dette problem og afhjælpe det.
It is regrettable that this was not clearly stated when it was published in the Paris newspaper. Unfortunately President Chatenet was the victim of one of the disasters which often occur during the life of a politician.
Vi er klar over alvoren af denne krise, og vi mener, at man må gøre alt, undersøge aUe idéer og forestüle sig alle løsninger for at nå til en aftale, så man i den forsonende ånd, som syntes at have vist sig hos aUe regeringerne i FæUesskabets medlemslande, finder en formel, der kan bringe Fællesskabet på rette vej igen.
I would thus very willingly have withdrawn my question, but I thought that President Chatenet's interview could form a basis for the exchange of some useful ideas and thus give rise to a constructive and helpful debate on achieving our objectives.
Jeg tror, at Deres bestræbelser, kære repræsentanter for Ministerrådet, vü finde stor støtte i hele Europa-Parlamentet, dog forudsat at man stadig er trofast over for de principper, der er fast lagt i Romtraktaterne.
Is it or is it not true that Euratom's work has been disappointing and futile? It is obvious that Mr. Chatenet no longer thinks this, given that he shares the views just expressed by Vice-President Carelli on behalf of the executive Commission.
Vi tvivler ikke på Deres standhaftighed.
For our part, we particularly appreciate what has been achieved.
Men vi må ikke glemme, at strukturen i Romtraktaterne er den eneste garanti for, at det endelige mål med enhedsprocessen ikke forrådes.
This was Euratom's main objective under the Treaty of Rome, in other words to provide the right conditions for this industrial use and for the development of a powerful nuclear industry.
Det er altså nødvendigt at værne om denne struktur så præcist som muligt.
This is precisely what the Treaty of Rome provides. This objective has been attained.
Vi frygter, at man ved ihærdigt at søge en løsning på den alvorlige krise, som rammer denne proces, ender med give efter for fristelsen tü defacto at ændre det, man ikke tror er rigtigt at ændre dejure.
In fact it could be said that as a result of the research carried it will soon be possible to produce electricity at a competitive cost compared with other sources of energy.
Altså ingen indrømmelser, ingen svaghed: Det er den appel, som Europa-Parlamentet nu ret ter tü repræsentanterne for Ministerrådet. Vedholdenhed, tålmodighed og god vUje, det er de egenskaber, der er påkrævede.
The information given in the executive's report, which Mr. Carelli has just mentioned, supports further our favourable opinion of the work carried out by the Commission of Eurotom.
Måtte følgende ord afVUhelm af Oranien være tü trøst, støtte og opmuntring: "Det er ikke nødvendigt at håbe for at tage fat, og det er ikke nødvendigt at have succes for at være vedholdende".
The cause of greater concern in President Chatenet's interview were the views he expressed on the usefulness of the Rome Treaties for European construction. Yes, it is disturbing to find the
Ja, det er foruroUgende, at formanden for EURATOM-Kommissionen har vist manglende tillid over for det instrument, som Rom-traktaterne udgør, til konstruktionen af Europa på det økonomiske og politiske plan.
President of Euratom's Commission expressing a lack of confidence in the Treaties of Rome as an instrument for the economic and political construction of Europe.
Når Pierre Chatenet taler om at gøre Europa til et Europa "à la carte", og når han nævner eksemplet med de hurtige reaktorer, der hovedsageligt interesserer Frankrig, Storbritannien og Tyskland, og som burde være genstand for en aftale meUem disse tre lande, selv om man så skal indgå andre aftaler med andre lande i forskellige sektorer, mener jeg i hovedsagen, at han har en tendens til at gøre den integrationsproces, der er iværksat af Rom-traktaterne, tü en proces om industrisamarbejde mellem suveræne stater.
When Mr. Chatenet speaks of'tailor-making' Europe, when he quotes the example of the neutron reactors which are of interest principally to France, Great Britain and Germany and must form the subject of agreement between these three countries, even if this means concluding other agreements in different sectors with other countries, I get the basic impression that he is seeing the integration process under the Treaties of Rome as a process of industrial cooperation between sovereign states.
Men dette er i strid med de principper, der er omtalt i Romtraktaterne. Vi har aUe som repræsentanter for eller med udøvende beføjelser i institutionerne i henhold tü traktaterne en pligt tü at indgyde tillid i andre og ikke skabe mistiUid.
This is, however, contrary to the principles of the Treaties of Rome and all those who are hold representative or executive office within these Treaties' institutions, I repeat all, have the duty to inspire the others with confidence and not breed distrust.
Heldigvis indeholder interviewet med Pierre Chatenet en optimistisk tone, som det er værd at bemærke, da han mener, at selv om EURATOM-forsøget er skuffende, giver det også rige muUgheder for fremtiden.
Luckily it must be acknowledged that Mr. Chatenet's interview contained a note of optimism since he considered that although Euratom was disappointing, it was also rich in potential for the future.
Det var det, han vüle sige, da han i sit interview anbefalede "ikke at smide barnet ud med badevandet".
This is what he meant in his interview when he recommended 'not throwing the baby out with the bath water'.
Det er navnlig ved dette aspekt, tror jeg, at vi må standse på det tidspunkt, hvor fusionen, der skal forene de tre FæUesskabers eksekutive organer, giver anledning til modløshed, bekymring og frygt hos de hundredvis af forskere, der er afhængige af Det Europæiske AtomenergifæUesskab.
I believe that this is, above all, the aspect to concentrate on when dealing with the discourage ment, concern and fear roused amongst hundreds of researchers who are dependent on the European Atomic Energy Community by the merger to unite the three executives.
Hvad ville der ske ikke alene med hver enkelts personUge situation, men også med det arbejde, de hidtil har udført, og som de er så optaget af?
What will happen, not only to each person's own future but also to the work they have achieved so far and to which they are so attached?
Vi har pligt til at berolige forskerne og gøre det hurtigst muligt.
We have a duty to reassure these researchers as quick ly as possible.
EURATOM er et værdifuldt instrument tü koordinering og udvikling af forskningen på alle de videnskabelige områder og af den naturvidenskabelige forskning generelt.
Euratom constitutes a precious instrument for the coordination and development of research in all fields of science and scientific research in general.
Og efter min mening er det meget sigende, at næsten samtidig med interviewet af Pierre Chatenet i le Figaro besluttede Den Liberale Gruppe og beslægtede grupper at fremlægge et forslag til beslutning, der nu diskuteres i de kompetente udvalg, en beslutning, der har til hensigt at omdanne Det Europæiske AtomenergifæUesskab tü et egentUgt videnskabeligt forskningsfæUesskab, så dette FæUesskab skuUe have opgaven med at iværksætte den fæUes videnskabspoUtik, der er absolut nødvendig for Europas Uv og fremskridt.
To my mind, it is significant that, almost at the same time as Mr. Chatenet's interview in Le Figaro, the Liberal and Allies Group had decided to put forward a motion for a resolution seeking to transform the European Atomic Energy Community into a genuine Scientific Research Community, in order to give this Community the task of implementing scientific policy, this being absolutely essential to European life and progress.
De ved alle bedre end mig, hvor langt bagud den nuværende videnskabelige forskning er i Det Europæiske FæUesskabs lande i forhold tü andre lande, og hvor bekymrende det er.
You all know better than I that scientific research in the European Community is at present falling far below that of other countries and is giving cause for concern.
I henhold til de allerede offentliggjorte tal brugte De Forenede Stater i 1963 93 dollars pr. indbygger til videnskabelig forskning, mens Storbritannien brugte knap 33 og landene i Fællesskabet som helhed kun 17.1 Sovjetunionen var der i 1963 en mülion forskere og i De Forenede Stater 1,3 million forskere, mens der i det samme år i Det Europæiske Fællesskab var knap en halv milUon.
According to figures now published, compared with 93 dollars per capita spent in the United States on scientific research in 1963, Great Britain spent scarcely 33 and the Community countries taken as a whole only 17.Against a million researchers employed in the Soviet Union in 1963 and one million three hundred thousand in the United States, there were scarcely five hundred thousand in the European Community during the same period.
Det er ikke det hele.Vi havde i løbet af det samme år, 1963, en meget betydelig udvandring af forskere, idet 2.232 af dem tog tü De Forenede Stater og forlod Fællesskabets medlemslande, hvor de ikke fandt tilstrækkeUg opmuntring tü udøvelse af deres aktiviteter eller tiltrækkende arbejdsforhold.
This is not all. During the same year, 1963, there was a truly impressive migration of researchers, 2 232 of whom went to the United States, abandoning the Community's member countries where they found inadequate encouragement for their work and less attractive working conditions.
Vi kunne nævne andre tal, der viser, hvor langt bagud den videnskabelige forskning er i Vesteuropa, mens dette kontinent før i tiden var den eneste kilde til videnskabeligt fremskridt i verden.
We could quote other figures demonstrating the backwardness of scientific research in western Europe, whereas this continent was at one time the only source of scientific progress in the world.
Det er den virkelig dramatiske situation i Vesteuropa.
The Americans are calculating that in 1975 their industrial production will include 40% of products which are at present unknown and whose existence cannot be imagined.
Derfor må vi bestræbe os på hurtigst muligt at afhjælpe vores mangler og give den videnskabelige forskning i vores seks lande et effektivt skub fremad.
Western Europe is therefore in a very dramatic situation and we must endeavour to remedy this insufficiency as quickly as possible by giving a really effective impetus to scientific research in our six countries.
Og det er netop derfor, det er absolut nødvendigt at skabe instrumentet for en fæUes videnskabspolitik.
This is why it is absolutely essential to form a common scientific policy.
Vi har et hensigtsmæssigt middel, EURATOM, som vi allerede har en passende erfaring med, og væsentlige elementer tü iværksættelse af en fælles videnskabspoUtik.
We have an adequate instrument, Euratom, which already has the experience and the resources to introduce a common scientific policy.
Man skal over lade denne opgave til EURATOM.
This task should be given to Euratom.
EURATOM skal være det videnskabelige forskningsfællesskab. skab.
Euratom should become the Scientific Research Community.
Det er med det formål, at vi har forelagt vores forslag til beslutning, og det er den positive kon klusion, som efter min mening kan drages af denne debat, som interviewet med Pierre Chatenet, der var offentliggjort i le Figaro, var anledning til.
It is with this aim in mind that we have put forward our motion for a resolution. It is the positive conclusion which I believe emerged from the debate which followed President Chatenet's interview in Le Figaro.
Efter denne debat fremlægger Den Liberale Gruppe og beslægtede grupper under henvisning tü artikel 46 i forretningsordenen et forslag til beslutning med anmodning om afstemning straks.
At the end of this debate, the Liberals and Allies Group, with reference to Article 46 of the Procedure, will put forward a motion for a resolution with application for an immediate vote.
Dette forslag til beslutning, som jeg mener vil blive enstemmigt godkendt af Parlamentet, fordi det nøjagtigt er udtryk for alle medlemmernes oprigtige mening, uanset hvilken poUtisk gruppe man tilhører, indgår i rækken af forslag, der for nylig er forelagt af Den Liberale Gruppe og beslægtede grupper, og som for øjeblikket er til behandUng i de pågældende udvalg, men som dog er anderledes.
I believe that this motion for a resolution will receive the unanimous approval of this Assembly because it forms an exact expression of the deep feeling of all members, regardless of their political affiliation. It is along the same lines as the proposal presented recently by the Liberal and Allies Group, which is now under study within the committees concerned, but is, however, quite different.