natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Når forældrene har fælles forældremyndighed over barnet, har hver af dem ret til ydelserne i halvdelen af den periode, hvorunder de udbetales. En forælder, som har
In light of the foregoing, reference must be made to the provisions specific to family benefits which form Chapter 7 of Title III of Regulation No 1408/71 in order to determine whether a person in a situation such as that of Mrs Kuusijärvi is entitled to continue to receive the parental benefit which has been paid to her under the legislation of a Member State, even after she has ceased all occupational activity in the territory of that State and has transferred her residence to another Member State.
forældremyndigheden alene, kan få udbetalt forældreydelser for hele den omhandlede periode.
provision is also applicable to a worker who lives with his family in a Member State other than the one whose legislation is applicable to him.
en medlemsstats lovgivning, ... for de af sine familiemedlemmer, der er bosiddende på en anden medlemsstats område, [har] ret til familieydelser efter lovgivningen i førstnævnte stat, som om de pågældende var bosiddende pä dennes område, jf. dog bestemmelserne i bilag VI«.
In that connection, it should be observed that Article 73 of Regulation No 1408/71, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3427/89 of 30 October 1989 provides: 'An employed or sellemployed person subject to the legislation of a Member State shall be entitled, in respect of members of his family who are residing in another Member State, to the family benefits provided for by the legislation of the former State, as if they were residing in that Slate, subject to the provisions of Annex VI.'
Ganske vist har moderen ret til forældreydelse fra den 60. dag inden datoen for den forventede fødsel, men inden for langt størstedelen af den periode, hvorunder ydelsen udbetales, er det den forælder, der hovedsagelig har barnet i sin varetægt, som har ret til forældrcydelse, og retten kan hermed også tilkomme faderen.
The same is true of Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71, as amended by Regulation No 3427/89, which applies the rule laid down in Article 73 to an unemployed person who was formerly employed or self-employed and who draws unemployment benefit under the legislation of a Member State.
Som Domstolen fastslog i dom af 17. maj 1984, Brusse, skaber denne artikel til fordel for den arbejdstager, der er omfattet af lovgivningen i en anden medlemsstat end den, på hvis område hans familiemedlemmer er bosat, en egentlig ret til de familieydelser, der er fastsat i den lovgivning, som finder anvendelse.
As the Court held in its judgment in Case 101/83 Raad van Arbeid ν Brusse, that article creates, in favour of a worker who is subject to the legislation of a Member State other than the State in whose territory the members of his family reside, a real entitlement to the family benefits provided for by the applicable legislation.
Der kan ikke gøres indgreb i denne ret ved anvendelse af en klausul i denne lovgivning, som udelukker udbetaling af familieydelser til personer, der ikke er bosat på den pågældende medlemsstats område.
That entitlement cannot be defeated by the application of a provision of that legislation by virtue of which persons not residing in the territory of the Member Slate in question arc not to receive family benefits.
I øvrigt er ydelsesbeløbet, på visse betingelser og med visse forbehold, fastlagt direkte på grundlag af den pågældende forælders erhvervsindtægt.
A person in a situation such as that of the applicant in the main proceedings, however, clearly does not fulfil the conditions either of Article 73 or of Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71, inasmuch as neither that person nor lhe members of his family have ever resided in a Member State other than the one whose legislation was applicable to him.
Den pågældende forælder har nemlig, forudsat at vedkommende har været tilmeldt et socialforsikringskontor uden afbrydelse i mindst 240 dage inden fødslen eller datoen for den forventede fødsel, i 360 af de 450 dage, hvorunder forældreydelsen udbetales, ret til en ydelse, der overstiger det garanterede minimumsbeløb på 60 SEK pr. dag og som regel udgør 75% af den tidligere erhvervsindtægt.
That is so in particular by reason of the fact that, under Article 13(2)(f) of Regulation No 1408/71, a person in such a situation is subject, after transferring his residence to another Member State, to the legislation of that Member State, as is to be seen by the reply to the second question.
Ifølge Domstolens praksis finder denne bestemmelse også anvendelse på en arbejdstager, som bor med sin familie i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvis lovgivning han er omfattet af.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court that
Det samme gælder for artikel 74 i forordning nr. 1408/71, som ændret ved forordning nr. 3427/89, hvorved reglen i artikel 73 bringes i anvendelse på arbejdsløse arbejdstagere eller selvstændige erhvervsdrivende, der modtager ydelser ved arbejdsløshed efter lovgivningen i en medlemsstat.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 lune 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, applies lo a person who, on the entry into force of that regulation in a Member Slate, was residing in that Stale as an unemployed person, having previously been in employment there, and who, by reason of that employment, was receiving unemployment benefit under lhe social security scheme of that Member Slate.
Dette gælder navnlig, fordi en person, som befinder sig i en sådan situation, efter at have taget bopæl i en anden medlemsstat, i medfør af artikel 13, stk. 2, litra f), i forordning nr. 1408/71 er omfattet af lovgivningen i denne medlemsstat, således som det fremgår af besvarelsen af det andet spørgsmål.
Article 13(2)(f) of Regulation No 1408/71, as inserted by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2195/91 of 25 June 1991, does not preclude the legislation of a Member State from making the right of a person who has ceased all occupational activity in its territory to remain subject to Us legislation dependent on his continued residence there.
Det bemærkes, at artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71, som ændret ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3427/89 af 30. oktober 1989, bestemmer, at »en arbejdstager eller en selvstændig erhvervsdrivende, der er omfattet af
Regulation No 1408/71 does not preclude the legislation of a Member State from providing that a person who has ceased all occupational activity in its territory loses the right to continue to receive family benefits paid under that legislation on the ground that he has transferred his residence to another Member State where he lives with the members of his famdy. '
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
He was of the opinion that the questions referred should be answered as follows:
•1) Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af Ζ juni 1983, finder anvendelse på en person, der på det tidspunkt, da forordningen trådte i kraft i en medlemsstat, opholdt sig i medlemsstaten som arbejdsløs efter en tidligere beskæftigelsesperiode og på dette grundlag modtog arbejdsløshedsunderstøttelse i henhold til den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringsordning
'(1) Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community applies to a person who was insured in a Member State within the meaning of Article 1(a) and subject to the legislation of that State at the time the Regulation became applicable there even though at that point that person was neither employed nor in receipt of unemployment benefit in that State.
2) Artikel 13, stk 2, litra f), i forordning nr. 1408/71, som indsat ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2195/91 af 25. juni 1991, er ikke til hinder for, at en medlemsstat i sin lovgivning gør retten for en person, som helt er ophørt med at have erhvervsmæssig beskæftigelse på medlemsstatens område tilfortsat at være omfattet af medlemsstatens lovgivning betinget af, at den pågældende bevarer sin bopæl i medlemsstaten.
(2) Article 22 of Regulation No 1408/71 precludes a Member State from refusing to continue payment of maternity benefit to a person otherwise entitled to such benefit by reason solely of a transfer of residence to another Member Stale.'
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 16. december 1997. ~"~~
Joined Cases T-171/95 and T-191/95 Al and Others and Becker and Others ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, gælder for en person, som var forsikret i en medlemsstat i artikel 1, litra a)'s forstand og undergivet denne stats lovgivning på tidspunktet for forordningens ikrafttrædelse, selv om den pågældende person på daværende tidspunkt hverken havde beskæftigelse eller oppebar arbejdsløshedsunderstøttelse i denne stat.
Officials — Pensions - Weighting — Change of capital — Retroactive effect — Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) No 3161/94 — Action for annulment —Admissibility — Act adversely affecting an official (Third Chamber)
Det er i strid med artikel 22 i forordning nr. 1408/71, at en medlemsstat afviser fortsal at betale ydelser ved moderskab til en person, som i øvrigt ville have ret til at oppebære sådanne ydelser, alene med den begrundelse, at hun er flyttet til en anden medlemsstat.«
Case T-172/95 Valentino Chesi, Margot Jost and Ralph Lochiseli ν Council of the European Union Staff Regulations of Officials
Forenede sager T-171/95 og T-191/95 Al m.fl. og Becker m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-l73/95 Erich Biedermann, Walter Ileddcrich and Alfred Wienrich ν Court of Auditors of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd -pension -justeringskoefficient - ændring af hovedstad — tilbagevirkende gyldighed - forordning (EKSF, EF, Euratom) nr. 3161/94 - annullationssøgsmål formaliteten bebyrdende retsakt* (Tredje Afdeling)
Officials — Pensions — Weighting — Change of capital — Retroactive effect — Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) No 3161/94 — Action for annulment -Admissibility —Act adversely affecting an official
Sag T-172/95 Valentino Chesi, Margot Jost og Ralph Loebisch / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Joined Cases T-10/97 and T-l 1/97 Unifrigo Gadus Sri and CPL Imperial 2 SpA ν Commission of the European Communities Free movement of goods
Sag T-173/95 Erich Biedermann, Walter Hedderich og Alfred Wienrich / Revisionsretten for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
(Post-clearance recovery of customs duties - Regulation (EEC) No 1697/79 — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93) (Third Chamber)
»Tjenestemænd —pension justeringskoefficient — ændring af hovedstad — tilbagevirkende gyldighed — forordning (EKSF, EF, Euratom) nr. 3161/94 — annullationssøgsmål formaliteten — bebyrdende retsakt* (Tredje Afdeling)
On 8 October 19% it adopted Decision C(96) 2780 def ('the Decision'), Article 1 of which is in the following terms: 'the import duties, amounting to LIT 148 890 000, in respect of which Italy submitted its request dated 2 February 1996 must be recovered'.
Forenede sager T-10/97 og T-ll/97 Unifrigo Gadus Sri og CPL Imperial 2 SpA / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Frie varebevægelser
It was in those circumstances that, by applications lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 17 January 1997, the applicants brought the present proceedings.
•Efteropkrævning af told forordning (EØF) nr. 1697/79 forordning (EØF) nr. 2454/93* (Tredje Afdeling)
During the course of 1993 the Norwegian customs authorities volunteered to the Italian authorities the information that, according to findings made by them, the exporter was unable to prove that the products were of Norwegian origin.
•1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaberfrifindes. frifindes.
Articles 871 and 873 of Regulation No 2454/93 confer on the Commission a decision-making power, in particular where the competent authorities consider that the criteria for waiving postclearance recovery of customs duties are fulfilled.
2) Sagsøgerne betaler sagens omkostninger*
That decision-making power is designed to ensure the uniform application of Community law.
Sag T-17*/97 Alan Hick / De Europæiske Fællesskabers Økonomiske og Social Udvalg Tjenestemandsvedtægten
The third and fourth pleas in law, alleging infringement of Article 5(2) of Regulation No 1697/79 and breach of the general principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
»Tjenestemænd -forfremmelse - tjenestemand stillet til rådighed for sin tidligere tjenestegren midlertidig tjeneste i en anden stilling i tjenestens interesse magtfordrejning* (Femte Afdeling)
initially accepted by the customs authorities of a Member State, since the role of those authorities in regard to the initial acceptance of declarations in no way prevents subsequent checks from being carried out.
Sag T-167/97 Kyriakos Skrikas / Europa-Parlamentet Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Thus, where, as in the present case, the importing undertaking had no cause to suspect that the exporting undertaking had forged the certificates of origin, no postclearance recovery can take place.
»Tjenestemænd - beslutning om ikke at forfremme en tjenestemand annullationssøgsmål formaliteten - bebyrdende akt - sammenligning af fortjenester - overflytning fra en institution til en anden vedtægtens artikel 45, stk 1* (Fjerde Afdeling)
Article 5(2) of Regulation No 1697/79 provides: 'The competent authorities may refrain from taking action for the postclearance recovery of import duties or export duties which were not collected as a result of an error made by the competent authorities themselves which could not reasonably have been detected by the person liable, the latter having for his part acted in good faith and observed all the provisions laid down by the rules in force as far as his customs declaration is concerned.'
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling^ den 9. juni 1998.
In the present case, the parties arc agreed that the error giving rise to the litigation was committed by the exporter, who declared that the products were of Norwegian origin but was subsequently unable to prove that declaration.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
Thus, only errors attributable to acts of the competent authorities confer entitlement to the waiver of postclearance recovery of customs duties.
Rådets direktiv 65/65/EØF af 26. januar 1965 om tilnærmelse af lovgivning om lægemidler, som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 83/570/EØF af 26. oktober 1983, skal fortolkes således, at det ikke
The Decision therefore sets out in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the Commission.
Præjudiciel - Court of Appeal, London -fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 65/65/EØF af 26. januar 1965 om tilnærmeke af lovgivning om lægemidler (EFT 1965-1966, s. 17) -tilbagekaldelse af en markedsføringstilladelse - de nationale myndigheders kompetence
That condition cannot be regarded as fulfilled where the competent authorities have been misled — in particular as to the origin of the goods — by incorrect declarations on the part of the exporter whose validity they do not have to check or assess.
mere end tredive år gamle, antages at frembyde en historisk eller etnografisk værdi i denne bestemmelses forstand.
it should declare that the Decision does not affect their right to waiver of the postclearance recovery of the customs duties.
Ovennævnte direktiv forpligter ikke den kompetente nationale myndighed til at afvente en udtalelse fra Udvalget for Medicinske Specialiteter for at kunne træffe ovennævnte afgørelse om tilbagekaldelse, når udvalget ikke har overholdt de frister, der er fastsat ved Rådets andet direktiv 75/319/EØFaf 20. maj 1975 om tilnærmelse af lovgivning om medicinske specialiteter, som ændret ved ovennævnte direktiv 83/570.«
Article 7 of Regulation No 1697/79, which is applicable to the facts of the present case, prohibits the charging of default interest on sums recovered postclearance where the non-collection of the customs duties due is attributable to an error made by the competent authorities.
Præjudiciel — Juzgado de lo Social de Santiago de Compostela — fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 48, stk. 2, og artikel 51 og af artikel 67, stk 1, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af 2. juni 1983 (EFT L 230, s. 6, bilag I) national lovgivning om ydelser ved arbejdsløshed, som forbeholder en ikkebidragsbaseret ydelse til arbejdsløse, der har opnået en bestemt alder, for personer, som har erhvervet ret til pension ifølge den nationale ordning for alderspension
In Case T-ll/97 the applicant observes that it is apparent from the letter of 22 November 1996 from the Verona customs authorities informing it of the amount of customs duties to be recovered that that total includes the amount relating to customs slip 7338 F of 27 September 1990, which does not concern products the origin of which had been contested.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Fjerde Afdelinel den 11. juni 1998.
The applicants deny that the claim for compensation is inadmissible, as alleged by the Commission.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 11. juni 1998.
This head of claim must be rejected, since it cannot affect the lawfulness of the Decision and in fact falls within the competence of the national court which is called upon to review the legality of the Italian administrative act ordering postclearance recovery of the duties.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
Since the Court's assessment has not disclosed any error of law or of fact on the part of the Commission, the applicants are wrong to claim that it has committed any such fault.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
The Court:
tjenesteydelser i forbindelse med disse transaktioner, som udføres af forsikringsmæglere og -formidlere [direktivets artikel 13, punkt B, litra a)J
Officials — Promotion — Official made available to work in the department in which he was previously employed — Secondment in the interests of the service — Misuse of powers (Fifth Chamber)
at tage hensyn til forsikrings- eller beskæftigelsesperioder, der er tilbagelagt efter en anden medlemsstats lovgivning, i det omfang, der på grundlag af sådanne bidragsperioder kan opnås ret til alderspension, forudsat pensionsalderen nås, i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor den kompetente institution er beliggende.
Officials — Decision not to promote an official — A c t ion for annulment —Admissibility —Act adversely affecting an official Consideration of the comparative merits — Inter-institutional transfer — Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations (Fourth Chamber)
Desuden kan kortbeskyttelsesordningen i sin helhed kun fritages for moms, såfremt forsikringsydelsen udgør dens fremherskende element.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 9 June 1998.
Sag C-349/96 Card Protection Plan Ltd Commissioners of Customs & Excise Tjenesteydelser præsteret af en leverandør af en kortbeskyttelsesordning for kreditkort af den type, som leveres af CPP i hovedsagen, kan ikke udgøre en forsikringstransaktion i den betydning, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i sjette direktivs artikel 13, punkt B, litra a), for så vidt som den fritagelse for forsikringst ransaktioner, der er omhandlet i denne bestemmelse, kun dækker forsikringsydelser leveret af den person, som er ansvarlig for at udbetale erstatning til forsikringstageren, såfremt en af forsikringen dækket risiko indtræder.
Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medicinal products, as amended by Council Directive 83/570/EEC of 26 October 1983, must be construed as not requiring Member States to introduce a procedure for judicial review of decisions taken by the competent national authority which would allow the competent national courts to substitute their assessment for that of the
405) — Impuesto sobre Actos Jurídicos Documentados — national afgift, der ikke pålægges indfrieben af et obligationslån som sådan, men det notarialdokument, hvorved indfrieben attesteres
application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 - National legislation concerning unemployment benefits which reserves a noncontributory benefit intended for unemployed persons over a certain age to persons entitled to a pension under the national old-age insurance system
Generaladvokat N. Fennelly fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 11. juni 1998.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 11 June 1998.
»Artikel 11 og 12 i Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969 om kapitaltilførselsafgifter skal fortolkes således, at de er til hinder for opkrævning af en afgift på 0,5% af notarialdokumenter, som attesterer indfrielsen af et lån under omstændigheder som de i hovedsagerne foreliggende.«
Case C-349/96 Card Protection Plan Ltd Commissioners of Customs & Excise Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf—Interpretation of Heading 9705 of the Combined Nomenclature — Council Regulation No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariffand statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1) - Collectors' piece of historical interest — 'Classic' cars
Præjudiciel — Tribunal Superior de Justicia, Barcelona — fortolkning af artikel 11, litra b), og artikel 12 i Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969 om kapitaltilførselsafgifter (EFT 1969 II, s.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 11 June 1998.
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om ikke al godkende ændringerne om forhøjelse af priserne ifølge de kontrakter om salg af hvede, der blev afsluttet i forbindelse med et mellemfristet lån, som Fællesskabet ydede Sovjetunionen og dens republikker med henblik på finansiering af køb af landbrugsprodukter -henvisning (tidligere sag C-377/93)
He recommended that the Court reply as follows: the card-protection plan ('Plan') operated by it is exempt from VAT pursuant to Article 13B(a) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes -Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, only if the insurance component of the Plan is supplied by an insurer who undertakes the risk.
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om ikke at godkende den kontrakt om salg af hvede, som sagsøgeren har afsluttet i forbindelse med et mellemfristet lån, som Fællesskabet ydede Sovjetunionen og dens republikker med henblik på finansiering af køb af landbrugsprodukter henvisning (sag C-404/96 P)
Articles 11 and 12 of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital should be interpreted as precluding the levying of 0.5% duty on the notarial deed recording the redemption of a loan in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings.