natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
"Traktatens bestemmelser om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser skal fortolkes således, at de er til hinder for nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter tilladelse til synkronisering til ét af et lands officielle sprog af film fra tredjelande kun meddeles distributører, som forpligter sig til at distribuere indenlandsk producerede film."
"The provisions of the Treaty concerning freedom to provide services must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude national legislation which reserves the granting of licences for dubbing into one of the official national languages films originating in non-member countries to distributors who undertake to distribute national films."
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. februar 1993.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on 18 February 1993.
"Nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter synkronisering af film fra tredje lande er omfattet af en ordning om tilladelser, hvorved distributøren er pålagt en forpligtelse til samtidig at indgå en aftale om distribution af en film produceret i den pågældende medlemsstat, er udtryk for en form for forskelsbehandling af filmproducenter fra andre med lemsstater, der er i strid med Traktatens artikel 59, idet der med sådanne bestemmelser navnlig forfølges økonomiske hensyn, og for skelsbehandlingen derfor ikke kan være lovlig ud fra et hensyn, der er anerkendt i fællesskabsretten."
"National rules which subject the dubbing of films from non-member countries to a system of licences requiring the distributor to undertake contractually to distribute at the same time a film from the Member State in question is discriminatory against film producers from other Member States contrary to Article 59 of the Treaty and since it pursues mainly economic aims cannot be justified under Community law."
Sag C-174/91: Kommissionen nod Kongeriget Belgien
Case C-174/91 Commission ν Kingdom of Belgium
"Traktatbrud - manglende opfyldelse af en dom afsagt af Domstolen -beskyttelse af grundvandet" (Domstolens plenum)
(Failure of State to fulfil obligations - Non-compliance with the judgment of the Court - Protection of groundwater) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgået til Domstolens Justitskontor den 3. juli 1991, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 171, idet det trods Domstolens dom af 17. juni 1987 i sag 1/86, Kommissionen mod Belgien, Sml. s. 2797, endnu
By application lodged at the Court on 3 July 1991 the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that by persisting, in spite of the judgment of 17 June 1987 in Case 1/86 Commission ν Belgium [1987] ECR 2797, in its failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 80/68/EEC in the Walloon and Flemish regions, the Kingdom of Belgium had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty.
Kongeriget Belgien har ikke efterkommet Domstolens dom af 17. juni 1987 i sag 1/86 og har følgelig tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 171, idet det i artikel 8 i dekretet af 30. april 1990 for den vallonske region om beskyttelse og udnyttelse af vandforekomster, der er egnet til fremstilling af drikkevand, ikke har angivet de stoffer i liste II, som der henvises til i artikel 5 i Rådets direktiv 80/68/EØF af 17. juni 1979 om beskyttelse af grundvandet mod forurening forårsaget af visse farlige stoffer.
6 - to in Article 5 of Council Directive 80/68/EEC of 17 December 1979 on the protection of groundwater against pollution caused by certain dangerous substances, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to comply with the judgment of 17 June 1987 in Case 1/86 and accordingly has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty.
Generaladvokat C. Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 16. februar 1993.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion on 16 February 1993.
Generaladvokaten foreslog Domstolen:
He proposed that the Court should:
"at give Kommissionen medhold i dens påstand og at dømme Kongeriget Belgien til at afholde sagens omkostninger."
"Uphold the Commission's claim and order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs."
5.5.1993 "Traktatbrud - tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om kosmetiske midler" (Domstolens plenum)
(Failure by a Member State to fulfil obligations - Approximation of the national laws relating to cosmetic products) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgået til Domstolens Justitskontor den 26. september 1991, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Franske Republik ikke har overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til Rådets direktiv 76/768/EØF, idet den stiller krav om oprettelse, opbevaring og ajourføring af et dossier med oplysninger, der går ud over dem, der kan kræves efter direktivets artikel 7, stk. 3.
By application lodged on 26 September 1991 the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by requiring a product file to be compiled, lodged and kept up to date, outside the framework laid down in Article 7(3) of Council Directive 76/768/EEC, the French Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
Domstolen henviste til en tidligere dom, hvori den allerede havde fastslået, at der ved direktivet er sket en fuldstændig harmonisering af de nationale forskrifter om emballering og etikettering af kosmetiske midler, hvorfor en medlemsstat for markedsføring af kosmetiske midler ikke kan stille andre krav end de i direktivet indeholdte.
The Court stated that since, as it had previously held, the directive had provided exhaustively for the harmonization of national rules on the packaging and labelling of cosmetic products, a Member State could not subject the movement of cosmetic products to conditions other than those imposed by the directive.
Domstolen henviste også til en anden dom, hvori den havde fastslået, at det er i strid med direktivet at gøre markedsføring af kosmetiske midler betinget af, at der føres et dossier, der indeholder andre oplysninger end dem, der kan stilles krav om i henhold til direktivet.
Furthermore the Court declared that to subject the marketing of cosmetic products to a requirement that a file be kept containing information additional to that required by the directive was incompatible with the provisions of the directive.
- 8 - juli 1976 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om kosmetiske midler, idet den stiller krav om oprettelse, opbevaring og ajourføring af et dossier med oplysninger, der går ud over dem, der kan kræves efter direktivets artikel 7, stk. 3.
By requiring a product file to be compiled, lodged and kept up to date, outside the framework laid down in Article 7(3) of Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 12. januar 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion on 12 January 1993.
"at give Kommissionen medhold og at dømme sagsøgte til at betale sagens omkostninger."
"Uphold the application and order the defendant to pay the costs."
FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion on 4 May 1993.
Sag C-298/89: Gibraltar's regering mod Rådet
Dismiss the application as inadmissible;
Annullation af artikel 2 i Rådets direktiv 89/463/EØF om ændring af direktiv 83/416/EØF om udstedelse af tilladelse til interregional ruteflyvning med passagerer, post og fragt mellem medlemsstaterne.
Case C-52/92 Commission ν Portuguese Republic (Failure of State to fulfil obligations - Infringement of Commission Decision 91/237/EEC concerning the further protection measures relating to a new pig disease)
Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 4. ma.i 1993.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on 5 May 1993.
Generaladvokaten foreslog Domstolen:
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
"- at afvise sagen, og at dømme sagsøgeren til at betale sagens omkostninger, jf. procesreglementets artikel 69, stk. 2, idet intervenienterne dog skal bære deres egne omkostninger, jf. artikel 69, stk. 4".
"Category 161 of Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3563/84 of 18 December 1984 applying generalized tariff preferences for 1985 to textile products originating in developing countries must be
Sag C-52/92: Kommissionen mod Den Portugisiske Republik
interpreted as meaning that it also includes men's linen windcheaters (imported from China and South Korea)."
Traktatbrud - tilsidesættelse af Kommissionens beslutning 91/237/EØF om beskyttelsesforanstaltninger mod en ny svinesygdom.
Case C-90/92 Tretter ν Hauptzollamt Stuttgart-Ost (Interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1739/85 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain ball bearings and tapered roller bearings originating in Japan - Scope - Interpretation of heading 84.62 of the Common Customs Tariff and the NIMEXE 84.62-09 - Linear only guideways)
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 5. maj 1993.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion on 6 May 1993.
"at give sagsøgeren medhold og at dømme sagsøgte til at betale sagens omkostninger."
Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion on 6 May 1993.
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 5. maj 1993.
Case C-152/93 Thomas O'Dwyer ν Council (Action for liability - Damages resulting from the effects of Council Regulation (EEC) No 748/93)
Generaladvokaten foreslog Domstolen at besvare det præjudicielle spørgsmål således:
Case C-153/93 klasser- und Schiffahrtsdirektion Hest ν Delta Schiffahrts- und Spedi t ionsgesel 1schaft (Prel iminary ruling - Landgericht Düsseldorf - Interpretation of Artides 5(2) and 85(1) of the EEC Treaty in relation to the German system of binding tariffs for the transport of goods by inland waterway)
"Kategori nr. 161 i bilag II til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3563/84 af 18. december 1984 om anvendelse af generelle toldpræferencer i 1985 for tekstilvarer med oprindelse i udviklingslande skal fortolkes således, at den også omfatter "herrevindjakker af hør" (indført fra Kina og Sydkorea)".
Case C-154/93 Tavi1-Albertini v Ministre des Affaires Sociales (Preliminary ruling - French Conseil d'Etat - Interpretation of Article 7 of Council Directive 78/686/EEC - Dental surgeon - Community national holding a diploma awarded in a non-member State but recognized as equivalent to a national diploma by another Member State)
Fortolkning af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1739/85 om indførelse af en en delig antidumpingtold på importen af visse kuglelejer og koniske rullelejer med oprindelse i Japan - anvendelsesområde - fortolkning af pos. 84.62 i Den Fælles Toldtarif og af NIMEXE-nummer 84.62-09 - kuglelejer der kan bevæges lineært.
Case 155/93 Angelina van den Berk v Studentenwerk Hamburg (Preliminary ruling - Hamburgisches Oberverwaltungsgericht - Interpretation of Articles 12(1) and 7(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 - Child of a migrant worker - Child having itself acquired the status of migrant worker)
Generaladvokat C Gul mann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredie Afdeling) den 6. maj 1993.
Case C-156/93 Parliament v Commission (Annulment of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 207/93 - Prerogatives of the European Parliament)
"Artikel 1, stk. 1, i Rådets forordning nr. 1739/85 af 24. juni 1985 skal fortolkes således, at der ved ordet "kuglelejer ... svarende til NIMEXE-nummer 84.62-09 ..." udelukkende skal forstås kuglelejer i teknisk forstand, altså kun lejer der roterer radialt, men ikke såkaldte kuglebøsninger."
Case C-157/93 Elizabeth McFadden v Council and Commission (Action for damages - Non-contractual liability of the Community by reason of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 - Milk production quota scheme - Exclusion of former beneficiaries of a nonmarketing premium under Regulation (EEC) No 764/89)
Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 6. mai 1993.
Case C-160/93 Joseph Brennan ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Generaladvokaten foreslog Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
Case C-161/93 Declan Murray ν Council and Contins si on See Case C-157/93
Sag C-152/93: Thomas O'Dwyer mod Rådet
Case C-165/93 Thomas Fox ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse - Landgericht Duisburg - fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 5, stk. 2, og artikel 85, stk. 1, i forhold til en tariffastsættelsesprocedure i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland for varetransport ad sejlbare vandveje.
(Annulment of Commission Decision No 2264 of 30 September 1992 excluding from the financing provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 866/90 the plan for the reorganization of an establishment for the dehydration and conversion into fodder of lucerne and straw contained in the operational programme submitted by the Regione Marche)
Sag C-156/93: Parlamentet mod Kommissionen
Case C-173/93 Anthony Conway ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Annullation af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 207/93 - Europa-Parlamentets rettigheder
Case C-174/93 Madeline Fitzachary ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Sag C-157/93: Elizabeth McFadden mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Case C-175/93 Oliver O'Neill ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Sag C-158/93: Brendan Merrigan m.fl. mod Rådet og Konmissionen
Case C-176/93 John Richmond ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Se sag C-157/93
Case C-177/93 Philomena Folan ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Sag C-159/93: James Hennigan mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Case C-178/93 Peter Darcy ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Se sag C-157/93
Case C-179/93 Francis 0'Hal 1oran ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Sag C-160/93: Joseph Bennan mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Case C-180/93 James Blair ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Se sag C-157/93
Case C-181/93 Thomas Ryan ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Sag C-161/93: Declan Murray mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Hogan ν Council and Commission
Se sag C-157/93
Case C-182/93 Patrick See Case C-157/93
Sag C-162/93:
Case C-183/93 William Boyce ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Leslie Conboy mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Marry ν Council and Commission
Se sag C-157/93
Case C-184/93 Philip See Case C-157/93
Sag C-163/93: Patrick English m.fl. mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Case C-185/93 Haldane Elkin and Others ν Council and Commission See Case C-157/93
Sag C-164/93: Ernst Strong m.fl. mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Please add to the No 9/93 proceedings of the Court of Justice the following heading:
Se sag C-157/93
ORDERS
Se sag C-157/93
19 March 1993
Sag C-166/93: John O'Donnell m.fl. mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Preliminary rul ing (Inadmissibility) (Full Court)
Annullation af Kommissionens afgørelse 2264/92 af 30. september 1992, hvor ved Kommissionen afslog ansøgningen om finansiering i henhold til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 866/90 af projektet vedrørende omstrukturering af en virksomhed, der beskæftiger sig med dehydrering og forarbejdning af lucerne og halm til foder inden for rammerne af aktionsprogrammet fremsat af Regione Marche.
The Court considered as a preliminary that the need to arrive at an interpretation of Community law of use to the national court required that the latter should define the framework from the point of view of the facts and law in which the questions arose or at the very least explained the factual assumptions on which those questions were based. Those requirements applied particularly so in certain areas such as competition, a feature of which is complex situations of fact and law.
Annullation af artikel 1, stk. 3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 95/93 -udsættelse med gennemførelsen af ordningen for Gibraltar's lufthavn, indtil en af Spanien og Det Forenede Kongerige aftalt ordning træder i kraft.
In those circumstances the Court found that pursuant to Article 92 of the Rules of Procedure the questions put to the Court for a preliminary ruling were manifestly inadmissible.
Se sag C-157/93
The Court ordered:
Sag C-185/93: Haldane Elkin m.fl. mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Published by the Information Service of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, L-2925 Luxembourg.
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Ugen 10. - 14. maj 1993
10 to 14 May 1993
III - FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
Court of First Instance
(Præjudiciel) "Godstransport ad landevej - faglige kvalifikationer" (Første Afdeling)
Verkeer en Waterstaat (Preliminary ruling - Road haulage - Professional competence) (First Chamber)
Ved kendelse af 8. november 1991, der indgik til Domstolen den 28. november 1991, havde College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 74/561/EØF.
By an order of 8 November 1991, which was received at the Court Registry on 28 November 1991, the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven referred a question for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Council Directive 74/561/EEC.
Sagens baggrund var følgende. I 1960 stiftede H. J. J. van Doesselaar sammen med E. F. van Esbroek et interessentskab med henblik på i fællesskab at udøve virksomhed i form af landevejstransport.
In 1960 Mr van Doesselaar, with Mr E.F. van Esbroek, established a partnership with the object of operating a road haulage undertaking.
Interessentskabet fik tilladelse til at udøve transportvirksomhed, idet van Esbroek kunne dokumentere, at han var i besiddelse af de faglige kvalifikationer, som krævedes efter den da gældende nederlandske lovgivning.
The undertaking was authorized to engage in the occupation of road haulage operator since Mr van Esbroek was in possession of supporting documents which proved that he had the level of professional competence required by Netherlands legislation in force at the relevant time.
I en første periode, der varede højst to år, udførte van Esbroek en række administrative opgaver, men fra 1962 til 1987 var det udelukkende van Doesselaar, der rent faktisk ledede den af interessentskabet udøvede transportvirksomhed.
During an initial period of at most two years, Mr van Esbroek carried out some administrative duties but, during the period from 1962 to 1987 it was Mr van Doesselaar who, on his own, effectively managed the haulage operation of the undertaking run by the company.
Den 23. april 1987 afgik van Esbroek ved døden, hvorefter interessentskabet blev opløst.
On 23 April 1987 Mr van Esbroek died and the partnership consequently came to an end.
Ved skrivelse af 1. august 1987 ansøgte van Doesselaar, der ønskede fortsat at udøve transportvirksomheden på egen hånd, det pågældende nederlandske ministerium om at måtte blive undtaget fra de gældende faglige kvalifikationskrav efter Wet Autovervoer Goederen (lov om godstransport ad landevej).
By letter of 1 August 1987 Mr Van Doesselaar, since he wanted to continue operating the haulage undertaking on his own, requested the Minister to grant him an exemption from the condition as to professional competence required by the Wet Autovervoer Goederen (Law on the carriage of goods by motor vehicles).
Det var ubestridt, at van Doesselaar ikke er og aldrig har været i besiddelse af noget bevis for faglig kvalifikation.
It is undisputed that Mr van Doesselaar does not, and never has had, any document attesting his professional competence.
Ved afgørelse af 24. december 1987 afslog ministeriet van Doesselaar's ansøgning.
By decision of 24 December 1987 the Minister refused Mr van Doesselaar's request.
Som begrundelse herfor anførtes det, at forholdet siden 1960 havde været det, at van Doesselaar ikke på egen hånd havde kunnet udøve virksomhed i form af godstransport, idet han ikke opfyldte de faglige kvalifikationskrav.
In support of that decision, the Minister explained that Mr van Doesselaar had not been able to engage in the occupation of selfemployed road haulage operator since 1960 as he did not fulfil the requirement as to professional competence.
Ministeriet bemærkede endvidere, at den af van Doesselaar ønskede undtagelse savnede hjemmel i artikel 5 i direktiv 74/561.
Furthermore, according to the Minister, the exemption requested by Mr van Doesselaar could not be based on Article 5 of Directive 74/561.
Domstolen bemærkede, at det må antages at fremgå af ordlyden af og systematikken i direktivets bestemmelser, at formålet med dettes artikel 3 er at sikre, at den person, som rent faktisk og vedvarende leder en transport virksomhed, opfylder kravet om faglig dygtighed.
It appeared from the wording and the structure of those provisions that Article 3 of the Directive is intended to ensure that the person effectively and continuously managing the transport operations satisfied the condition as to professional competence.
Det var på dette grundlag, at der måtte ske en undersøgelse af direktivets artikel 5, hvorved Domstolen allerede har fastslået, at denne bestemmelse er en overgangsbestemmelse, som omhandler de tilfælde, hvor personer godtgør, at de før den 1. januar 1978 i henhold til en national lovgivning i en medlemsstat har haft tilladelse til at udøve virksomhed i form af godstransport ad landevej.
Article 5 should be examined from the same point of view. Thus the Court had already held that Article 5 is a transitional provision applying to the case of persons furnishing proof that, before 1 January 1978, they were
Det fulgte heraf, at artikel 5, stk. 1, skal fortolkes således, at enhver, der på et tidspunkt forud for den 31. december 1974 er blevet udpeget til rent faktisk og vedvarende at lede en transportvirksomhed, efter bestemmelsen endeligt er undtaget fra forpligtelsen til at fremlægge dokumentation for sine faglige kvalifikationer.
Article 5(1) must be interpreted as meaning that it definitively exempts from the requirement to furnish proof of professional capacity anyone who, after a date prior to 31 December 1974, has been designated to continuously and effectively manage the transport operations of an undertaking.
Domstolen tilføjede, at denne fortolkning er i overensstemmelse med formålet med direktivet.
That interpretation was in accordance with the purpose of the Directive.
Da formålet med artikel 3 er at sikre, at den eller de personer, der faktisk og vedvarende leder en transportvirksomhed, opfylder betingelsen om faglig dygtighed, må bestemmelsen i artikel 5, stk. 1, hvor efter "personer ..., som godtgør, at de inden 1. januar 1978 i henhold til nationale bestemmelser i en medlemsstat har haft tilladelse til at udøve erhverv med godstransport ad landevej", fortolkes således, at der sigtes til personer, som før deÏ nævnte tidspunkt efter en national lovgivning har haft tilladelse til rent faktisk og vedvarende at lede en transportvirksomhed. hed.
Since the purpose of Article 3 is to ensure that the person or persons who manage continuously and effectively the transport operations of the undertaking satisfy the condition as to professional capacity, the wording of Article 5(1), "[n]atural persons and undertakings furnishing proof that, before 1 January 1978, they were authorized under national regulations in a Member State to engage in the occupation of road haulage operator", must be interpreted as meaning that it refers to persons who, before that date, have been authorized, in accordance with a national regulation, to manage effectively and continuously the transport operations of an undertaking.