natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Foreninger og forbund blev ligeledes spurgt om forholdet mellem »egne« og »eksterne« indkomst­kilder over de seneste tre regnskabsår.
Additional information was also sought from vol­untary organizations and federations about the balance of 'own' to 'external' income over the last three financial years.
Forholdet mellem egne og eksterne ressourcer er i gennem­snit 45:55 uden nogen svingninger af betydning over de tre år.
The ratio of own resources to external resources was on average about 45:55, with no significant fluctuations over the three years.
Nogle foreninger/forbund oplyser imidlertid, at 100% af deres årlige indkomst ude­lukkende stammer fra enten deres egne eller fra eksterne ressourcer.
In each year, however, there were some vol­untary organizations/federations claiming that 100% of their income was derived exclusively either from their own or from external resources.
Med andre ord skaber hoved­parten af foreningerne lidt under halvdelen af deres indkomst selv, ¡det man for den resterende dels vedkommende er afhængige af subsidier af den ene eller anden art. Der er dog en del forenin­ger, der enten er helt selvfinansierende eller helt afhængige af ekstern støtte.
In other words most voluntary organizations appear to generate a little under half their income themselves, relying for the remainder mainly on subsidies of one kind or another; but there are numbers of voluntary organizations which are either wholly self­sufficient or alternatively, wholly dependent on external aid.
Der var mindre iøjnefaldende forskelle under »eks­terne ressourcer«.
There was less variation apparent when we looked at 'external resources'.
Langt den vigtigste eksterne ind­komstkilde for foreninger i alle medlemsstater undtagen én, opgives som subsidier fra offentlige myndigheder (52 %), derefter kommer støtte fra privatpersoner (22%), internationale organer (10 %), tilskud fra fonde (9 %) og endelig støtte fra virksomheder (7 %).
By far the most important source of external income for voluntary organiza­tions in all but one Member State was reported to be subsidies from public authorities (52%).
For at se disse gennemsnitstal i det rette perspektiv er tilskud fra fonde kun en vigtig indkomstkilde i to af medlemslandene (mel­lem 3 og 6 %). Det samme gælder støtte fra virk­somheder.
This was followed by support from individuals (22%), support from international bodies (10%), grants from foundations (9%), and lastly support from
Egne og eksterne ressourcer
Own and external resources
Til medlemmer Støtte, privatpersoner
Œ lo members Γ Support individuals Τ
15 20 25 Gennemsnitlig andel i %
0.15 0.20 Average part in %
Byggeri og boliger
Sphere of activity
Kultur og fritid
• Culture and recreation
Borgerlige rettigheder og støtte
• Civil rights and advocacy
Sundhed
• Health
Erhvervsorganisationer og faglige organisationer
• Business and professional voluntary organizations
Ser vi nærmere på tallene, f.eks. for »kultur og fri­tid«, viser det sig, at 41 % af foreningerne, hvis hovedaktivitet ligger inden for dette område, også er engageret i andre kulturelle og kunstneriske aktiviteter: 37 % i sport, 29 % i fritids­ og under­holdningsklubber og 27 % i medier og kommuni­kation.
Looking in a little more detail at the figures on, for example, 'culture and recreation', reveals that 41% of voluntary organizations whose main activity lies in this field are also involved with other cultural and artistic activities ­ 37% with sport, 29% with recreational and entertainment clubs and 27% with the media and communication.
Foreninger, der opgiver et andet område som deres hovedaktivitetsområde, er ligeledes akti­ve inden for »kultur og fritid«.
Voluntary organizations which gave another area as their main field of activity were also active in 'culture and recreation'.
Tallene i parentes viser den forholdsmæssige andel af de respondenter, der opgiver hvert af disse områder som et aktivitetsområde.
The figures in brackets indicate the proportion of respondents naming each of these areas as one in which they were active.
Der tages i disse tal hensyn til, at mange foreninger, som allerede nævnt, er aktive på en række forskellige områder samtidig.
These figures take account of the fact that, as has already been made clear, many voluntary organizations are active in a num­ber of fields at once.
Dette fremgår tydeligt af nedenstående diagram, der viser den forholdsmæssige andel af foreninger, hvis hovedaktivitet ligger inden for ét område, men som også er aktive på andre.
This is clearly revealed by the following diagram showing the proportions of vol­untary organizations whose main activity may lie in one field but which are also active in others.
Større forskelle viser sig imidlertid ved en nærmere gen­nemgang af typer af sociale tjenesteydelser, hvor
There were, as would be expected, differences between countries, though it is noteworthy that social services was named most frequently in all
Denne »flerfunktionstendens« er typisk for den filosofiske fremgangsmåde, som foreninger har valgt, og er ligeledes ofte udtryk for, at forholdene
A further example is provided by 'health': 36% of voluntary organizations which claimed that health was their main area of activity were involved in rehabilitation, 35% were involved with public health services, and 26% were active in nursing homes.
Aktivitetsområde og hovedaktivitetsområde
Areas of activity and main areas of activity — frequencies in %
Sociale tjenesteydelser Kultur og fritid Byggeri/boliger Uddannelse og forskning Interne aktiviteter i co
Social services Culture and recreation Development/housing Education and research International activities Health Civil rights c
Sundhed Borgerlige rettigheder
Environment Philanthropy
art. Subsidier svinger fra mellem 31 % af den samlede eksterne indkomst for velgørende foreninger/forbund til 73 % for erhvervsorganisationer og faglige organisationer.
Subsidies provide from 31% of total external income of charitable voluntary organizations/federations to 73% of such income for business and professional bodies.
Som det allerede er nævnt, udgør støtte fra privatpersoner også en vigtig ind komstkilde.
As has already been noted, support from individuals is also an important source of income.
Velgørende foreninger og forbund oplyser f.eks., at støtte fra privatpersoner udgør 37 % af deres eksterne indkomst.
Charitable voluntary organizations and federations, for example, said that support from individuals represented 37% of their external income.
Miljøorganisationer angiver forholdet til 29% og inden for sociale tjenesteydelser, uddannelse og forskning samt internationale aktiviteter udgør det en femtedel af de eksterne ressourcer.
Environmental voluntary organizations claimed the proportion to be 29%, and in the fields of social services, education and research and inter national activities, it represented a fifth of external resources.
De eneste, der for alvor falder uden for dette billede, er erhvervsog fagorganisationer, der kun får 2 % af deres eksterne indkomst fra privatpersoner.
The major exception to this picture was provided by business and professional voluntary organizations, which derived only 2% of their external income from individuals.
I denne forstand er foreninger sjældent helt »genstandsorienterede«.
Voluntary organizations in this sense are rarely entirely 'subject-oriented': their focus is above all on people and their problems.
Det primære element er først og fremmest mennesker og deres problemer.
In this spirit, many voluntary organizations provide what is in effect a 'one-stop shop' either for the inhabitants of a particular area, or for the group which is their special concern.
På grundlag heraf har mange foreninger i realiteten etableret et »supermarked« (one-stop-shop) enten for indbyggerne i et bestemt område eller for den gruppe, som de specielt arbejder med. Således beskæftiger en forening, der f.eks. arbejder med handicappede, sig ikke blot med den umiddelbare virkning af et bestemt handicap, men også med klienternes behov for oplysning og rådgivning samt med hele den lange række af problemer, der optager klienten, herunder som det vigtigste deres rettigheder som borgere.
Thus a voluntary organization dealing with, for example, people with disabilities will deal not simply with the immediate results of a particular disability, but will tend to occupy itself also with the information and advice needs of its clients and with the whole range of concerns affecting them, including, most importantly, their rights as citizens.
Det sidste er specielt vigtigt, hvilket også tydeligt fremgår af diagrammet: Selvom kun 6% i stikprøven anser sig selv for primært at være beskæftiget med menneskerettigheder, siger 35 %, at det også er et område, de er aktive på.
This latter is a particularly important point: as a glance at the diagram will show: while only 6% of our sample regarded themselves as primarily concerned with human rights, 35% gave it as a field in which they were active.
Den samme »flerfunktionstendens« er karakteristisk for hele diagrammet.
The same multi-functionality is evident throughout the diagram.
Ved at se på udgifterne og aktiverne i de foreninger, der arbejder på forskellige områder, kan det konstateres, at organisationer beskæftiget med sociale tjenesteydelser og sundhed har de største udgifter.
When we looked at the expenditure and assets of voluntary organizations working in different fields we found that bodies concerned with social services and health had the highest expenditure.
Foreninger og forbund, der primært beskæftiger sig med borgerlige rettigheder og støtteaktiviteter, har både færrest udgifter og aktiver.
The voluntary organizations and federations whose main concern was with civil rights and advocacy had the lowest costs and the smallest assets.
Foreninger/forbund med henholdsvis miljø samt uddannelse og forskning som deres primære for mål er bedst stillede med hensyn til aktiver.
Environmental voluntary organizations/federations and those whose main objective was education and research were best off from the point of view of assets.
Med spørgsmålet om foreningernes geografiske dækning er vi primært interesserede i at få et ind tryk af, hvor stor en del af de adspurgte i stikprøven, der anser Europa for at være det centrale geografiske område for deres organisation - om ikke det eneste.
In asking about the geographical area covered by voluntary organizations, we were chiefly interested in gaining an impression of what sort of proportion of our sample considered Europe as a significant, if not the only, focus of their organization.
Resultaterne svinger overraskende meget. I et land anser kun 4% af respondenterne deres virkefelt for at omfatte Europa sammenlignet med 35% i et andet land.
The results varied surprisingly widely: in one country only 4% of respondents regarded their scope as extending to Europe, compared to 35% in another country.
Resultaterne bør dog sammenholdes med nedennævnte resultater over antallet af faktiske eller påtænkte partnerskaber eller andre aktiviteter, der varetages af foreninger på europæisk plan.
They should, however, be considered together with our findings (reported below) on the number of actual or intended partnerships or other activities undertaken by voluntary organizations at the European level.
Interessant nok forekommer der at være meget lidt overensstemmelse mellem, hvor vigtig organisationer anser Europa for at være og deres tilbøjelighed til at danne europæiske part nerskaber.
Interestingly, there appears to be little correlation between how important a focus organizations consider Europe to be and their propensity to form European partnerships.
Virkefeltet for en forening er naturligvis ikke nødvendigvis tæt forbundet med dens organisatoriske struktur.
The scope of a voluntary organization's interest is not, of course, necessarily closely related to its organizational structure.
En internationalt aktiv forening kan f.eks. godt have sine rødder i det lokale, hvorimod en forening, der er aktiv på nationalt plan i en bestemt medlemsstat, kan være meget lidt interesseret i Europa. Som en generel regel kan det siges, at jo større en organisations geografiske virkefelt er, jo mere forekommer den at spille en aktiv rolle på alle planer. Således anser de fleste nationale organisa tioner sig også for at være aktive både på lokalt og regionalt plan, mens kun få lokale organisationer anser deres virkefelt for at omfatte det nationale plan.
For example, an internationally active voluntary organization may well be locally based, whereas one which may be active at a national level within a particular Member State may lack any interest in Europe.
I tråd med dette er de fleste af de organisa tioner, der er aktive på europæisk plan, faktisk organiseret nationalt.
In line with this, most of the voluntary organizations that are active at the European level are, in fact, nationally organized.
I henseende til foreningers »egne ressourcer« er den vigtigste indkomstkilde for organisationer beskæftiget med kultur og fritid salg af tjenesteydelser til medlemmer samt medlemskontingent, i alt 29%.
As regards the own resources of voluntary organizations, the most important source of income for bodies in the field of culture and recreation was the sale of services to members and membership fees, both providing 29%.
Inden for uddannelse og forskning er internationale kontrakter (henholdsvis 25 og 27 %) den vigtigste indkomstkilde, og inden for sundhed er det medlemskontingent (36%).
In the fields of education and research and international activities, contracts (25 and 27% respectively) were the most important source of self-generated income, while in the area of health it was membership fees (36%).
Hos foreninger, der leverer sociale tjenesteydelser, udgør medlemskontingentet en vigtig del af deres »egne ressourcer« (33 %). Det samme gælder inden for borgerlige rettigheder (38%), byggeri og boliger (31%) samt miljø (35 %).
Voluntary organizations providing social services also said that membership fees constituted a significant part of their own resources (33%), as did those dealing with civil rights (38%), development and housing (31%) and the environment (35%).
I modsætning hertil får vel gørende organisationer størsteparten af deres egne ressourcer gennem salg af tjenesteydelser til medlemmer (28 %) og til ikke-medlemmer (26%).
In contrast, charity organizations obtain the bulk of their own resources by selling services to members (28%) and non-members (26%).
Hos erhvervsorganisationer og faglige organisationer er medlemskontingentet langt det vigtigste element i kategorien »egne ressourcer«.
For business and professional organizations, membership fees are by far the largest element in the own resources category. gory.
viser tydeligt den væsentlige, udlignende virk ning, disse organisationer har.
These findings, together with those on voluntary organizations' sources of income are a clear indication of the important redistributive effect which these bodies have.
Langt hovedparten af foreninger og forbund definerer deres målgruppe meget bredt: 46% af respondenterne siger, at de tjener »offentligheden som helhed« eller »unge« (37%) eller »voksne« (35%).
The great majority of voluntary organizations and federations defined their target public widely - 46% of respondents said that they served the general public or alternatively young people (37%) or adults (35%).
I modsætning hertil nævner kun få foreninger nærmere definerede grupper som deres særlige virkefelt.
In contrast, very few voluntary organizations mentioned more narrowly defined groups as their particular concern.
Det er tvivl somt, om der skal lægges nogen særlig betydning i dette resultat.
It may be doubted whether there is much significance in this finding.
Da foreninger i praksis ikke er be grænset til kun at foretage et enkelt valg på spørgeskemaet, er det sandsynligt, at de fleste respondenter, hvis aktivitet på den ene side er rettet mod en specifik gruppe af mennesker, f.eks. »narkomaner« eller »krigsveteraner«, eller på den anden side befolkningen som helhed (uanset om det drejer sig om at skaffe opmærksomhed om deres arbejde eller om at samle støtte), har angivet både den specifikke gruppe og »offentligheden som helhed«.
Since voluntary organizations were not, in practice, confined to one choice from the list provided in the questionnaire, the likelihood is that most respondents whose activity was directed on the one hand at a specific group of people, e.g. drug addicts or veterans and, on the other hand at the population as a whole (whether to draw attention to their work or to canvass for support) indicated both the specific group and general public.
På grund at den anvendte metode omfatter stikprøven uden tvivl en forholdsmæssig større andel af foreninger, der er aktive på europæisk plan, end det ville være at forvente i en mere videnskabelig stikprøve.
Because of the method we used, our sample undoubtedly contained a greater proportion of voluntary organizations which are active at the European level than would be expected in a more scientific sample.
Tallene er ikke desto mindre et imponerende vidnesbyrd om det omfang, hvori sektorens aktører over hele Fællesskabet allerede er begyndt at slutte sig sammen: 50% af de foreninger, der besvarede det relevante spørgsmål eller næsten en fjerdedel af det samlede antal adspurgte i stikprøven oplyste, at de allerede er involveret i aktiviteter på tværs af grænser i en eller anden form for partnerskab med statsborgere eller organisationer fra andre fællesskabslande.
The figures are nonetheless impressive evidence of the extent to which the sector is already beginning to come together throughout the Community: 50% of those voluntary organizations answering the relevant question, or nearly a quarter of the total sample, said that they were already involved in cross-border activities in some form of partnership with nationals or organizations from other Community countries. tries.
Når det tages i betragtning, at inspirationen til hovedparten af de velkendte netværk, der allerede er i funktion på europæisk plan, stammer fra Fællesskabets nordlige lande, kunne man have for ventet, at tendensen til dannelse af partnerskaber ville være mindre markant i den sydlige del end i den nordlige.
Given that the inspiration for the majority of the well-known networks already working at European level came from countries in the north of the Community, it might have been expected that the tendency to form partnerships might be less marked in the south than in the north.
Resultaterne understøtter ikke denne hypotese: Der var forskelle landene imellem, der ikke let lader sig forklare, men der var ikke nogen klar opdeling i det overordnede billede mellem henholdsvis den sydlige og nordlige del.
In the event, the findings did not support this hypothesis: there were differences between countries, which are not altogether easy to explain, but no clear division was discernible between the overall picture north and south.
På spørgsmålet om, hvem foreningerne yder tjene ster, lyder hovedparten af svarene ¡gen »offentligheden som helhed« (39 %), efterfulgt af de næstoftest forekommende kategorier »målgruppe« (38 %), »medlemmer« (36%) samt »statslige eller andre offentlige organer« (22 %).
When we asked voluntary organizations to whom they provided services the answer was, again, most often the general public (39%), followed as the next most frequent categories by the target group (38%) and members (36%), governments or other public bodies (22%).
Hvor meget disse tjene steydelser leveres frit eller mod betaling svinger fra land til land afhængig af, hvem der modtager ydelsen.
The extent to which these services were provided free or in return for payment varied according to the country concerned and to whom the service was provided.
Gratis tjenesteydelser leveres oftest til offentligheden som helhed samt til medlemmer. Ydelser, der skal betales for, leveres oftest til foreningens specifikke målgruppe, klienter eller offentlige myndigheder. digheder.
Free services were most often provided to the general public and to members, and paying services to the voluntary organization's particular target group or clients or to public authorities.
Ser vi på fremtiden, giver 46% af respondenterne udtryk for, at de forventer at gå ind i partnerskaber på tværs af grænser på et eller andet tidspunkt i fremtiden.
Looking ahead, 46% of our respondents said that they envisaged entering into cross-border partner ships at some time in the future.
Hvis man ser på det enkelte land, er det interessant at se, at det i realiteten er foreninger i de lande, der hidtil gennemsnitligt er gået ind i de færreste partnerskaber, som nu har de stærkeste fremtidige ønsker herom.
Interestingly, an analysis by country showed, in effect, that it is voluntary organizations in those countries that have hitherto formed a below-average number of part nerships which have the strongest future inten tions.
Når det med andre ord drejer sig om at arbejde på den europæiske scene, er det de foreninger, der nu halter bagefter, der har de stærkeste ønsker om at indhente det tabte.
In other words, when it comes to operating on the European stage, voluntary organizations in countries now lagging behind appear to have every intention of catching up.
Generelt leverer foreninger/forbund flere gratis varer og tjenesteydelser end varer og tjenesteydelser, man skal betale for.
Of voluntary organizations already in partnerships, 27% were active in 'social services', 14% in the field of 'culture and recreation', 13% in 'international activities'.
Omfanget af tjenesteydelser, der er gratis eller for bundet med betaling, er meget afhængigt af foreningens arbejdsområde. Eksempelvis er støtte til hjemløse sandsynligvis forbundet med gratis (eller i det mindste meget billige) varer eller tjenesteydelser, hvorimod det kan være passende at tage betaling for eksempelvis voksenundervisning.
11% in 'education and research' and 10% in 'development and housing'.
Disse resultater sammenholdt med resultatet af undersøgelsen af foreningers indkomstkilder
Again, there was evidence that voluntary organizations working in some fields where few partnerships have yet been formed have stronger future inten-
Af foreninger, der allerede indgår i partnerskaber, er 27 % aktive inden for »sociale tjenesteydelser«, 14% inden for »kultur og fritid«, 13% inden for »internationale aktiviteter«, 11 % inden for »uddannelse og forskning« og 10 % inden for »byggeri og boliger«.
Overall, more free goods or services were provided by voluntary organizations/federations than goods and services against payment. Not surprisingly, voluntary organizations and federations that mainly offer their services free rely more heavily on support from outside than do bodies which charge.
Det viser sig igen, at foreninger, der arbejder på områder, hvor der endnu kun er dannet få partnerskaber, har stærkere intentioner om at indgå i arbejde på tværs af grænser.
To what extent services are provided free or, alternatively, have to be paid for depended heavily on the voluntary organization's field of action.
F.eks. oplyser ikke mindre end 75 % af de foreninger i stikprøven, der er aktive inden for »byggeri og boliger«, at de planlægger at gå ind i partnerskaber i fremtiden.
For example, the support of the homeless is likely to involve the provision of free (or at least very cheap) goods or services whereas it may be reasonable to charge for, say, adult education.
Derimod har kun 22 % af de foreninger, der er akti­ve inden for sundhed, planlagt at indgå i partner­skaber.
On the other hand, only 22% of voluntary organizations active in the health field said that they were planning to enter into partnerships.
Dette kan meget vel være et udtryk for, at mange af dem i realiteten leverer offentlige tjene­steydelser ­ og ydermere på et kraftigt reguleret område.
This may well reflect the fact that many voluntary organizations supply what are, in effect, public services - and furthermore in a highly regulated field.
Under sådanne forhold kan det ganske enkelt forholde sig sådan, at et eventuelt partner­skab kun har lidt at tilbyde og derfor er mindre attraktivt.
In these sorts of circum­stance, partnerships may simply offer voluntary organizations less and thus be less attractive.