natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Brugere, der tilsammen lejer det største anul transpondere, benægtede, at der var nogen tekniske fordele ved en enkelt samlet kontrakt For at illustrere uholdbarheden i den påstand, at BT ville være det eneste konukded for kunderne i tilfælde af problemer, nævnte programleverandø­rerne et tilfælde fra foråret 1989, hvor der var tekniske problemer.
Users together leasing the largest number of trans­ponders denied thac chere were any cechnical advantages to a bundled concract To illustrate the fallacy of the argument that BT would be the single point of contact for customers in case of problems, programme providers cited the case of a technical incident which occurred in the spring of 1989.
Efter at have kontaktet BT, der var direkte ansvarlig for kundekontrakterne, blev en programleverandør derefter rådet til at kontakte SES for at løse problemet mens en anden programleverandør oplyste, at han også pi et senere tidspunkt drøftede problemet direkte med SES, fordi BT havde været langsommelig med at behandle sagen.
Having contacted BT as directly responsible under the customer contraccs, one programme provider was subsequendly advises to contacc SES to solve the problem, while another programme provider stated that at a later stage it also discussed the problem directly with SES because BT had been tardy in dealing with the mateer.
Grunden hertil er, at BT opniede eneret til at markedsføre en række transpondere pi Astra­satellitten til kunder i Det Forende Kongerige«; »Som køber ville X have foretrukket at handle med SES«.
The reason for this is chat BT obtained exclusive rights to market a number of transponders on the Ascra satellite to UK customers; As a buyer, X would have preferred dealing with SES;
Q anførte, at da han »allerede havde lokaliseret sine trans­missioner til London, var British Telecom den eneste, som kunne stille Astra­kapacitet til rådighed«.
Q stated chat as it had already located ics transmissions to London, British Telecom was the only one who could provide Astra capacicy.
Selv om Q anfører en række fordele ved en samlet kontrakt, ser hans udgangspunkt ud til at have været, at kapacitet pi Astra kun kunne fremskaffes gennem BT; de fordele, som Q nævner, har aldrig været bevist i praksis.
Alchough Q does cite certain advantages in having a bundled contraa, ics starting point appears to have been that capacity on Ascra could only be acquired through BT; also, the advantages it cited had never been put to the test in practice.
Adskillige mineder inden den endelige underskrivelse af en kontrakt med BT vedrørende to transpondere pi Astra IA, skrev Y til Oftel vedrørende »de store problemer, vi har med at fi konkurrerende pristilbud vedrø­rende tilridighedsstillelse af satellitkapacitet med mellemstor sendestyrke ...«; »Vi i Y har sammen med andre satellit­tv­selskaber opfor­dret Eutelsat og SES Astra til at fremsætte tilbud vedrørende til­ridighedsstillelse af en sidan kapacitet.
Several months before finally signing a contract with BT for two trans­ponders on Ascra IA, Y wroce eo Ofcel concerning che severe problems we are having in obtaining competitive quotations for che provision of medium power sacellice capacicy ...; we at Y, along with other sacellice cele­vision companies, have inviced Eucelsac and SES Astra to submit bids for the provision of such capacity.
Begge organisationer meddelte os, at vi skulle gi gennem Britisk Telecom International«; »Det, der gør sagen værre for os, er, at'BTI som en del af kontrakten om satellitkapacitet forlanger, at vi anvender deres jordstation­uplink­anlæg ved Woolwich.
Both organisations have informed us that we must deal chrough British Telecom International; What makes maccers worse for us is that BTI require as part of the concract for satellice capacity that we use their earth station uplink site at Woolwich.
Ved vurderingen af denne udtalelse, tog Kommissionen følgende i betragtning
In assessing this statement, the Commission took into consideration
Parterne har anført, at der dengang ikke var kundeinteresse for separate tjenester, og at udta­lelser, der fremsættes af programleverandørerne nu, da markedsvilkårene er ændret, ikke nødven­digvis afspejler, hvad de efterspurgte pi det tids­punkt, da aftalerne blev indgiet.
The parties have argued that there was no customer interest in an unbundled service at the cime and chac statements made by programme providers now when market conditions have changed do not necessarily reflect whac they requesced at the time the agreemencs were concluded.
Det er rigtigt, at Kommissionen ikke har fundet tegn pi skrevne anmodninger fra kunderne til BT og SES om separate aftaler.
Ic is true that the Commission has not found any evidence of written requesta by cuscomers to BT and SES for separate, unbundled services.
Som BT bemærkede under proce­duren, havde BT imidlertid mundtlige diskussioner om Astra IA med programleverandørerne, før aftalerne med SES blev indgået, hvilket dog ikke fremgir af »den arkiverede korrespondance«.
As BT noted during che course of che procedure, however, BT was engaged in oral discussions concerning Ascra IA wich programme providers before che arrangemencs wich SES were concluded, which were noe, however, evidenced by any 'correspondence in ehe file'.
I et brev til Oftel, nævnt under nr. 2, udtalte en programleverandør, at denne og andre havde ansøgt direkte hos SES om forsyning af satellitka­pacitet, men var blevet henvist til at ansøge gennem BT.
In a letter to Oftel, however, quoted above under 2., one programme provider staeed chac ic and ochers had applied to SES directly for the provision of sacellice capacicy, bue had been referred eo BT as che entity to deal chrough.
Under alle omstændigheder ville kunderne ikke have kunnet indgi separate service­aftaler pi grund af § 3, stk. 1, i hovedaftalen, der bestemte, at »den tjeneste, der tilbydes kunderne, skal omfatte de transpondere, der falder ind under aftalen, og uplink­forbindelsen«.
In any event, customers would necessarily have been denied unbundled services in view of Clause 3 (1) of the main agreement which stated thac The service offered to cuscomers will comprise che transponders covered by this agreement and the addition of the uplink'.
— det forhold, at der ikke blev givet nogen begrundelse for, hvorfor dette synspunkt blev anlagt; med hensyn til den tekniske fordel ved at handle med én enhed var Z's første reaktion, med hensyn til hvem han ville kontakte i tilfælde af problemer, at henvende sig til »SES«
— ehe faa that no reasons were given why this view was taken; with regard to the cechnical advantage of dealing wich one entity, Z's firsc reacción as to whom it would contact in case of problem was SES,
BT ejede 25 % af Z, da kundekontrakten blev indgiet; alle vigtige beslutninger, såsom
In the Commission's view, however, it was more likely che up co 50 % savings programme providers
Pi baggrund af ovenstående har Kommissionen konkluderet at da aftalerne mellem BT og SES
In view of the foregoing, the Commission has concluded chat as the arrangemencs becween BT
— ikke medførte forbedringer og fordele på det pågældende marked, og
On the marketing side, the parties argued that the pooling of their respective skills, resources and experience was required in order to promote the use of the Ascra satellite.
— ikke var nødvendige for at sikre SES's adgang til markedet for tilridighedsstillelse af rumsegmentkapacitet, mentkapacitet, kan de anmeldte aftaler ikke opnå fritagelse.
and SES: did not bring about any improvements and benefits on the market in question, and were not indispensable in order to ensure SES's entry into the market for che provision of space segment capacity, the notified arrangements were not eligible for exemption.
Under disse omstændigheder er det ikke nødven digt at undersøge, om de andre krav i artikel 85, stk. 3, er opfyldt.
Under these circumstances, it is not necessary to examine whecher the ocher requirements of Article 85 (3) are met.
Kommissionen er ikke enig i, at SES ikke selv kunne have fundet kunder i Det Forenede Kongerige, uafhængig af BTs markedsføringsindsats.
The Commission does not agree that SES could not have found customers icself in the United Kingdom, independently of BTs marketing efforts.
Det samlede antal tv-programleverandører, der var interesseret i satellit-tv i Det Forenede Kongerige, var mindre end ti pi de tidspunkt, da joint ventureselskabet blev oprettet og der er tilsyneladende ingen grund til, at SES's forretningsteam ikke serv kunne have søgt kontakt med disse potentielle kunder.
The total number of television programme providers interested in satellite television in the UK was less chan 10 at the time the joint venture was concluded, and chere is no apparene reason why SES's commercial team could not have approached these potencial customers itself.
En programleverandør har faktisk anført, at SES's forretningsmæssige leder selv meget aktivt promoverede Astrasatellitten i Det Forenede Kongerige, adskillige år før den blev opsendt og før joint ventureselskabet blev oprettet.
In faa, one programme provider has stated chac SES's commercial director was very actively promoting the Astra satellite in the UK himself, several years before it was launched and before the joint venture was established.
SES har anført, at dens indledende kontakter med kunder udelukkende blev omsat til bindende kontrakter med bisund fra BT.
SES has argued that its initial contacts with customers were only translated into binding contraas wich BTs assistance.
I betragtning af, at potentielle kunder allerede på et tidligt tidspunkt var klar over, at de skulle handle gennem BT — lang tid før de første kundekontrakter blev undertegnet — er det ikke muligt nu at fasuli med tilbagevirkende kraft, om kunderne følte, at BTs indblanding var nødvendig i denne henseende.
Given the fact that potential customers were already at an early stage informed that chey must deal through BT, well before the first customer contracts were signed, it is not possible to establish in retrospect whether customers felt BTs involvement was indispensable in this respect.
Det skal imidlertid bemærkes, at SES har solgt transpondere, der ikke er omfattet af joint venture-aftaler, direkte til programleverandører i en række lande, uden at der var behov for at indgi et joint venture med den lokale televirksomhed. somhed.
It should be noted, however, that SES has sold the transponders not covered by the joint venture arrangements directly to programme providers in a number of countries, without the need for a joint venture with the local telecommunications organ ization.
Konstaterer Kommissionen, at der foreligger en overtrædelse af bestemmelserne i Traktatens artikel 85, kan den ved beslutning pålægge de deltagende virksomheder at bringe de konstaterede overtrædelser til ophør, jf. artikel 3 i forordning nr. 17.
Pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation 17, the Commission may, by decision, find that there is an infringement of Article 85 of the EEC Treaty and require the undertakings concerned to bring such infringement to an end.
Dette indebærer ikke alene ophøret af de begrænsede aftaler mellem parterne, men også ophøret af begrænsende virkninger, der beror på kontrakter, som er indgået med udenforstående virksomheder i henhold til vilkårene for de førnævnte begrænsede aftaler.
This implies not only the termination of restrictive agreements between ehe parties, but also the elimination of restrictive effects residing in concraccs which have been concluded with third undertakings under the terms of the aforesaid rescriccive agreemencs.
Efter at parterne i denne sag var blevet hørt i overensstemmelse med artikel 19, stk. 1 og 2, i forordning nr. 17, gav de Kommissionen underretning om, at joint ventureaftalen mellem dem samt forskellige tillægsaftaler og tillægsdokumenter var blevet opsagt pr. 30. januar 1991; i henhold til bestemmelserne i opsigelsesaftalen vil bestiende
In the case at hand, after the parties had been heard in accordance with Article 19 (1) and (2) of Regulation No 17, chey informed the Commission that the jointventure agreement between them selves, and various ancillary agreements and side letters, were terminated on 30 January 1991; under the provisions of the termination agreement, existing customer contraas will remain in force, whereby che transponder lease takes place directly from SES to BT instead of passing through the
BTs indblanding i »salget« af transpondere pi Astrasatellitten lettede utvivlsomt overførslen af BTs Eutelsat- og Intensat-kunder til Astra takket være bestemmelserne i joint ventureaftalen om »double-illumination« og førtidig opsigelse af bestiende kundekontrakter. Adskillige kunder har imidlertid anført, at de tror, at den reduktion i satellitprisen, som kunne være opniet hvis BT
Finally, BTs involvement in the sale of trans ponders on the Astra satellite admittedly facilitated the transfer of BTs Eutelsat and Intelsat customers to Astra thanks to the joint venture agreement provisions on double-illumination and early termination of existing customer contracts.
Opsigelsen af joint ventureaftalen sikrer parternes autonomi for fremtiden.
The termination of the jointventure agreement ensures the commercial autonomy of the parties for the future.
De kundekontrakter, som BT indgik i henhold til joint venture-aftalerne, fortsætter imidlertid med at være i kraft i medfør af $ 5, stk, 1 (i) « opsigelsesaftalen mellem parterne uden ændringer.
However, the customer contracts which were concluded by BT under the jointventure arrangements continue to be in force pursuant to Clause 5.1 (1) of the termination agreement without any modification.
Kundekontrakter, som kunden ønsker skal fort sætte pi de oprindelige vilkår vil kun blive konkurrencebegrænsende, hvis de resulterer i udelukkelse af andre uplink-Ieverandører end BT.
Customer contracts which at the choice of the customer continue to run under the original terms would only be restrictive of competition if they result in the foreclosure of uplink providers other than BT.
Imidlertid synes en sidan udelukkelse usandsynlig, når der henvises til de gældende markedsvilkår, herunder særlig adgangen i Det Forenede Kongerige til uplink-forbindeiser til Eutelsat- og Intelsat-rumsegmentkapacitet via SAO og yderligere ny rumsegmentkapacitet såsom Astra I B, som i mellemtiden er kommet til.
However, in the light of current market conditions, in particular the accessibility of UK uplink providers to Eutelsat and Intelsat space segment capacicy chrough che SAO and additional new space segment capacity, such as Astra IB, which has in the meantime become available, such a foreclosure would seem unlikely.
Hvis der skulle frem komme nye oplysninger, kan det blive nødvendigt at iværksætte en ny procedure, uafhængigt af denne beslutning —
If new elemencs were to appear, proceedings independent of chose which have led eo chis Decision could be called for,
Hovedaftalen af 17. december 1987 mellem Société européenne des satellites SA og British Telecommunications plc og alle hertil knyttede tillægsdokumenter og aftaler vedrørende de foranstaltninger, hvorved de to parter samarbejdede om fælles tilridighedsstillelse af en tv-distributionstjeneste via satellit (samlet benævnt »aftalerne«), udgjorde en overtrædelse af EØF-Traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, frem til den 30. januar 1991, hvor disse aftaler blev bragt til ophør.
The riiain agreemenc of 17 December 1987 between Société Européenne des Sacellices SA and British Telecommunications pic, and all related side letters and agreemencs regarding the arrangemencs whereby che two parties cooperated in the joint provision of a television distribution service by satellice (collectively referred co as the agreemencs), consticuced an infringement of Article 85 (1) of ehe EEC Treaty until 30 January 1991, the dace on which chose agreemencs were terminated.
Disse kontrakter viderefører de af joint ven ture-aftalerne følgende konkurrencebegrænsende virkninger, fordi de kunder, som ønskede at udsende deres programmer via Astra IA satellitten, ikke fik noget valg med hensyn til at indgå separataftaler om dels uplinktjenester, dels transponsponderkapacitet.
These contracts perpetuate the restrictive effects resulting from the jointventure agreement because customers who wished to transmit their programmes via the Ascra IA sacellice were not given the choice of concluding separate contracts for, on che one hand, uplink services and, on the other hand, the lease of transponder capacity.
Desuden blev vilkårene i disse kontrakter fasdagt af BT og SES i forbin delse med joint venture-arrangementerne, det vil sige under fordrejede konkurrencevilkår.
Furthermore, the cerms of those customer contracts were'determined by BT and SES in the context of the jointventure arrangements, i.e. under conditions of distorted competition.
Dette betyder ikke, at kundekontrakterne også omfattes af artikel 85 stk. 1, alene på grund af deres forbin delse med de begrænsende horisontale aftaler.
This does not mean that the customer contraas, simply because of cheir links with the restrictive horizontal agreements, are also caught by Article 85 (1).
De begrænsende virkninger, som disse kontrakter viderefører, kan kun ophæves, når kunderne får ret til at ændre dem. Følgelig må de kunne vælge fortsat at ville være bundet af de med BT indgå ende kundekontrakter, at opsige eller genforhandle dem.
However, the restriaive effects which chese contraas perpetuate can only be eliminated when the customers have been given the right of read justment.
Med henblik herpå skal BT og SES inden en måned efter meddelelsen af denn beslutning meddele de programleverandører, der under tegnede kontrakter med BT om international tv-distribution via Astra I Asatellitten for den 30. januar 1991, at de — i en periode af fire måneder efter at være blevet underrettet herom — har ret til, hvis de ønsker det:
To this end, and within one month of the notification of this Decision to them, BT and SES shall inform programme providers who signed contracts with BT for international TV distribution services via the Astra IA satellite prior to 30 January 1991, that during the four months after having been so informed, chey may, if they so wish,
Der kan ikke indrømmes fritagelse i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 85, stk. 3, for de i artikel 1 omhandlede aftaler for den periode, i hvilken de var i kraft at genforhandle kontrakten, eller
An exemption pursuant to Article 85 (3) of the EEC Treaty for the agreemencs referred to in Article 1 is hereby refused for the period during which they were in force.
— opsige den med passende varsel.
— terminate the contraa, taking into account a reasonable period of notice.
Senest en mined efter meddelelsen af denne beslutning skal British Telecommunications plc (BT) og Société européenne des satellites SA (SES) skriftligt give de tv-programleverandører, som indgik kontrakter med BT om tv-distributionsjenester via Astra I Asatellitten før den 30. januar 1991, underretning om Kommissionens
Customers who choose to renegotiate or terminate must in any event be ensured that the uplink services and the use of the transponder capacity
Kunder, som vælger at genforhandle eller opsige mi under alle omstændigheder opni sikkerhed for, at uplink tjenester og brugen af
Wiehin one moneh from the dace of notification of this Decision, British Telecommunications pic (BT) and Société Européenne des Satellites SA (SES) shall inform television programme providers who concluded contracts with BT for celevision distribution services via the Astra IA satellite prior to 30 January 1991 in writing of the Commission's Decision and in particular Articles 1 and 2
Artikel 4 beslutning, særlig artikel 1 og 2, og meddele dem, at de — i en periode af fire mineder efter at være blevet underrettet herom — hvis de ønsker det er berettiget til
Λ thereof, and advise them that during a period of four monchs after having been so informed, such celevision programme providen are entitled, if they so wish, to
Nir skrivelsen i henhold til nærværende arikel 3 sendes til programleverandørerne inden for ovennævnte frist pi en måned, fremsendes samtidig en kopi heraf til Kommissionen.
• ,· i_i — terminate those contraccs, subjea to a reasonable period of notice given by them to BT, which in ies turn shall forthwith inform SES that such notice has been given.
De Europapiske Fællesskabers Tidende
Official Journal of the European Communities
KOMMISSIONENS BESLUTNING af 23. december 1992 om en procedure i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 85 (IV/32.448 og IV/32.450 : Cewal, Cowac, Ukwal) og EØF-Traktatens artikel 86 (IV/32.448 og IV/32.450: Cewal)
COMMISSION DECISION of 23 December 1992 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 85 (IV/32.448 and IV/32.450 : Cewal, Cowac and Ukwal) and 86 (IV/32.448 and IV/32.450 : Cewal) of the EEC Treaty
(Kun de danske, engelske, franske, italienske, nederlandske, portugisiske og tyske udgaver er autentiske)
(Only the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian and Portuguese texts are authentic)
under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4056/86 af 22. december 1986 om fastsættelse af de nærmere retningslinjer for anvendelse af Traktatens artikel 85 og 86 pi søtransport ('), særlig artikel 11, stk. 1, og artikel 19, stk. 2,
Having regard Co Council Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 of 22 December 1986 laying down detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty to maritime transporte), and in particular Articles 11 (1) and 19 (2) ehereof,
Cewal er en af de linjekonferencer, der driver trafik mellem Europa og Vest- og Centralafrika. De andre er Cowac (Continent West Africa Conference), Ukwal (United Kingdom West Africa Lines Joint Service) og Mewac (Mediterranean West Africa Conference).
Cewal is one of the shipping conferences operating between Europe and west and central Africa, the other conferences being Cowac (Continent West Africa Conference), Ukwal (United Kingdom West Africa Lines Joint Service) and Mewac (Mediterranean West Africa Conference).
under henvisning til klager indgivet den 10. og 20. juli 1987 i henhold til artikel 10 i forordning (EØF) nr. 4056/ 86, under henvisning til Kommissionens beslutning om at indlede procedure,
Having regard co ehe applicacions lodged on 10 and 20 July 1987, for a finding of an infringemenc pursuanc Co Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86,
Cewal's medlemmer er rederier, der driver regel mæssig linjetrafik mellem havne i Zaire og Angola og havne på Nordsøkysten (undtagen britiske havne).
Cewal is made up of shipping companies operating a regular liner service becween Che ports of Zaire and Angola and those of the North Sea (except the United Kingdom).
Der er indgået særaftaler med linjekonferencen Cowac's Sektion Syd om trafikken mellem havne i Zaire og Angola og havnene på den franske vestkyst.
Specific agreemencs with the southern section of the Cowac shipping conference govern the trade between Zaire and Angola on the one hand and the ports on ehe western coasC of France on Che ocher.
Cewal har desuden af Cowac fået »uddelegeret« trætransporterne fra Pointe-Noire til de euro pæiske Atlanterhavshavne.
Cewal also, 'by delegación from Cowac', Cransports wood from PoinCe-Noire Co ports on the European Atlantic coast.
efter at have givet de implicerede virksomheder lejlighed til at udtale sig om de af Kommissionen fremførte klage punkter og fremsætte deres øvrige bemærkninger, jf. artikel 23, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 4056/86,
Having given the undertakings concerned the opportunity to make known their views on the objections raised by the Commission and to present any other comments in accordance with Article 23 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86,
efter høring af Det Rådgivende Udvalg for Kartel- og Monopolspørgsmål inden for Søtransport, og
Having consulted the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions in the field of maritime transport,
Cowac-Syd's medlemmer er rederier, der driver regelmæssig linjetrafik mellem franske (fra
Cowac northern sección is made up of shipping companies operating a regular liner service between ports situated between the North Cape and Belgium on che one hand and ports in wesc Africa (from Mauritania co che Republic of Che Congo) on Che ocher.
(') BFT nr. L 378 af 31. 12. 1986, s. 4.
(') OJ No L 378, 31. 12. 1986, p. 4.