natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
»Der foreligger en aftale, der er forbudt i henhold til traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, og som ikke kan fritages efter forordning nr. 123/85, når en fabrikant inden for rammerne af et selektivt distributionssystem for automobilkøretøjer retter et cirkulære til sine forhandlere, og heri anmoder disse om at afvise at sælge nye motorkøretøjer til uafhængige leasingselskaber, når der er tale om køretøjer til kunder, der har deres hjemsted eller bopæl uden for det område, der er tildelt forhandleren.«
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows: "The obligation imposed by a manufacturer of motor vehicles on distributors in its distribution network not to negotiate or enter into leasing contracts except exclusively with its oun leasing company, or the prohibition imposed on its distributors from selling new vehicles to leasing companies other than that belonging to the manufacturer's group if those vehicles are intended to be used under leasing contracts obtained by the distributors, is an agreement prohibited by Article 85(1) of the Treaty and qualifies for no exemption under Regulation No 123/85.'
»Der foreligger en aftale, der er forbudt i medfør af traktatens artikel 85, stk 1, og som ikke kan fritages i medfør af forordning nr. 123/85, såfremt en producent af motorkøretøjer forbyder autoriserede forhandlere i sit selektive salgsbindingssystem at formidle leasingkontrakter til leasingvirksomheder — med undtagelse af virksomhedens eget leasingselskab — eller at sælge nye motorkøretøjer til dem, når køretøjerne skal tjene til opfyldelse af leasingkontrakter, som blev formidlet af de autoriserede forhandlere.«
"A circular sent by the manufacturer to its distributors, in the context of a selective distribution system for motor vehicles, which calls on the distributors to refuse to sell to independent leasing companies where the vehicles so bought are intended for customers whose residence or seat is outside the contract territory of the distributor concerned, is an agreement prohibited by Article 85(1) of the Treaty which does not qualify for exemption under Regulation No 123Æ5."
For det tilfælde, at Domstolen skulle nå frem til en anden afgørelse, foreslog han følgende besvarelse af andet spørgsmål:
In the event that the Court were to decide differently as to the possibility of exempting the clause in question on the basis of Regulation No 123/85, he proposed that the last question should be answered as follows:
Såfremt Domstolen måtte nå til en anden løsning med hensyn til fritagelsen i henhold til forordning nr. 123/85, foreslog han følgende besvarelse af det andet spørgsmål:
In the event that the Court were to decide differently, he proposed that the second question should be answered as follows:
»Det følger af princippet om fællesskabsrettens forrang, at en aftale, som er omfattet af en fritagelse efter en forordning, ikke i medfør af mere restriktive nationale bestemmelser kan forbydes af nationale myndigheder.«
"The principle of the primacy of Community law requires that an agreement protected by an exempting regulation cannot be prohibited, on the basis of more restrictive national provisions, by the national authorities."
»Det følger af princippet om fællesskabsrettens forrang, at en aftale, som er omfattet af en fritagelse efter en forordning, ikke i medfør af mere restriktive nationale bestemmelser kan forbydes af nationale myndigheder.«
"The principle of the primacy of Community law requires that an agreement protected by an exempting regulation cannot be prohibited, on thé basis of more restrictive national provisions, by the national authorities." ν
Sag C-266/93
Case C-266/93 Bundeskartellamt ν Volkswagen AG and VAG Leasing GmbH
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Hellenske Republik
Commission of the European Communities ν Hellenic Republic
Traktatbrud — manglende gennemførebe af Rådets
Preliminary ruling - Bundesfinanzhof -Interpretation of Article 48 of the EEC Treaty -System of tax on the income of a non-resident Community national
Præjudiciel — Bundesfinanzhof — fortolkningen af direktiv 89/117¡EØF om de forpligtelser med hensyn til offentliggørelse af
Advocate General Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 22 November 1994.
EØF-traktatens artikel 48 — indkomstbeskatningaf en EF-borger, der ikke bor på det nationale område årsregnskabsdokumenter, der påhviler de i en medlemsstat etablerede filialer af kreditinstitutter og finansieringsinstitutter med hjemsted uden for denne medlemsstat
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Failure to transpose Council Directive 891117¡EEC on the obligations of branches established in a Member State of credit institutions and financial institutions having their head offices outside that Member State regarding the publication of annual accounting documents
Lenz fremsatte forslap til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 22. november 1994.
Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 22 November 1994.
2) Denne artikel er i princippet ikke til hinder for, at en udenlandsk bosat arbejdstager beskattes hårdere afbeskæftigelsesstaten end en indenlands bosat, der har samme beskæftigelse, når de ikke er i en sammenlignelig situation i skattemæssig henseende.
In principle, that article does not preclude the State of employment from taking a non-resident employee more heavily that a resident in the same employment where their situations are not comparable from a fiscal point of view.
Den Hellenske Republik bærer sagens omkostninger.«
The Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs." of the European Kingdom of the ν
Sag C-93/94 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Nederlandene
Case C-93/94 Commission Communities Netherlands
3) Bestemmelsen er til gengæld til hinder for, at en medlemsstat A — såfremt en arbejdstager, bosat i medlemsstat B, som har en lønnet beskæftigelse i medlemsstat A, og 1) i medlemsstat A oppebærer hele eller størstedelen af sin indkomst og 2) i medlemsstat Β ikke oppebærer så store indtægter, at han sættes i personlig skat under hensyntagen til hans individuelle situation — opkræver en højere indkomstskat end den indkomstskat, der pålægges en person, der er bosat i medlemsstat A, og som har det samme skattegrundlag.
It does, however, preclude Member State A from setting, for a worker resident in Member State Β who is in salaried employment in Member State A and who (i) receives in Member State A the whole or the majority of his income and (ii) does not receive in Member State Β sufficient income to be taxable in that State taking into account his personal situation, higher income tax that that required of a resident in that Member State with the same taxable income.
Arbejdstageren skal nemlig have samme skattemæssige rettigheder som den, der er bosat på statens område.
That worker must therefore be entitled to the same fiscal benefits as the resident.
Traktatbrud — manglende gennemførebe af Rådets direktiv 90/667/EØF om sundhedsmæssige bestemmelser for bortskaffebe, forarbejdning og afsætning af animalsk affald og for beskyttelse mod forekomst af patogener i foder fremstillet af dyr, herunder fisk, og om ændring af direktiv 90/425/EØF
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -- Failure to transpose Council Directive 901667¡EEC laying down the veterinary rules for the disposal and processing of animal waste, for its placing on the market and for the prevention of pathogens in feedstuffs of animal or fish origin and amending Directive 90/425/EEC and amending Directive 90/425/EEC
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 22. november 1994.
It is contrary to Article 48 to exclude such an employee from the annual wages tax adjustment and from the assessment for income tax with account being taken of earnings from employment if a resident employee in the same situation would benefit therefrom.
4) Artikel 48 er til hinder for, at denne arbejdstager afskæres fra muligheden for tilbagebetaling af overskydende skat ved årets udgang, såfremt en arbejdstager, der er bosat på det nationale område, har denne ret.«
Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 22 November 1994.
·— at kende for ret, at Kongeriget Nederlandene har tilsidesat de forpligtelser, der følger af Rådets direktiv 90/667/EØF, idet det ikke inden for den foreskrevne frist, har vedtaget de
Case C-89/94 declare that by not having adopted within the prescribed period the
foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme dette direktiv.
He considered that the reply should be as follows:
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslap til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 24. november 1994.
«(1) measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 90/667/EEC, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive; order the defendant State to pay the costs."
— den sagsøgte medlemsstat bærer sagens omkostninger.«
A measure enacted by a Member State which prevents distributors established in that Member State from advertising on television does not constitute a measure equivalent in effect to a quantitative restriction on imports, within the meaning of Article 30 of the EEC Treaty.
2) Et sådant forbud er heller ikke i strid med Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF af 3. oktober 1989 om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af TV-radiospredningsvirksomhed.
Such a measure is not contrary to Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities.
Præjudiciel — Tribunal de commerce de Paris — fortolkningen af artikel 3, litra f), af artikel 5, 30, 85 og 86 i EØF-traktaten og af Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF om samordning af vbse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af TV-radiospredningsvirksomhed
Preliminary ruling -- Tribunal de Commerce de Paris - Interpretation of Articles 3(f), 5, 30, 85 and 86 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities National legislation exhaling the distribution sector from advertising on television
Præjudiciel — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía — fortolkningen af protokol nr. 2 til
Preliminary ruling - Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía - Interpretation of Protocol No 2 to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal concerning the Canary Islands and Ceuta and Melilla - Goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products covered by Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 3033/80,3034/80 and 3035/80 - Assimilation of the variable component of customs duties fixed for the processed product not falling under Annex II to
Annulation af artikel 1 i Kommissionens beslutning 94/291 /EF om en procedure i henhold til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2408/92 (sag VII/AMA/IV/93 - TAT- Paris (Orly) - Marseille
Preliminary ruling ~ High Court of Ireland -Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2340/90 preventing trade by the Community as regards Iraq and Kuwait -Export refund - Goods in transit unable to be delivered to the country of destination ~ Force majeure
og Paris (Orly) - Toulouse) - adgang til flyveruter inden for Fællesskabet — betjening af ruten Paris (Orly) — Marseille og ruten Paris — Toulouse og retur
"waste destined for recovery" used in Council Directive 91/156/EEC amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste and Council Regulation No 259/93 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community - Definition of the term "recovery" (simple storage in dump, incineration eta)
Sag C-302/94 The Queen (ex parte — British Telecommunications pic) / Secretary of State for Trade & Industry Præjudiciel — Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles — fortolkning af artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 77/187/EØF om tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om varetagelse af arbejdstagernes rettigheder i forbindelse med overførsel af virksomheder, bedrifter eller dele af bedrifter — om overdrageren eller erhververen har et valg med hensyn til at overføre hele personalet eller kun en del af personalet
Case C-302/94 The Queen (ex parte -- British Telecommunications pic) ν Secretary of State for Trade & Industry Preliminary ruling - Tribunal du Travail de Bruxelles - Interpretation of Article 3 of Council Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses - Possible choice for the transferor or the transferee to transfer only part of the personnel concerned
Præjudiciel — High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division — fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 90/387/EØF om oprettelse af det indre marked for teletjenester ved gennemførelse af tilrådighedsstillelse af åbne net ONP (Open Network Provision) og af direktiv 92/44/EØF om etablering af ONP-vilkår for faste kredsløb — medlemsstaternes rettigheder, henholdsvis kompetence med hensyn til spørgsmål om at opfylde forpligtelser og at fastsætte krav for selskaber, der er indehavere af særlige rettigheder eller af enerettigheder
Preliminary ruling - High court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - Interpretation of Council Directive 90/387/EEC on the establishment of the internal market for telecommunications services through the implementation of open network provision and Council Directive 92/44/EEC on the application of open network provision to leased lines -Member States' rights and powers to fulfil their obligations by imposing requirements solely on bodies holding special or exclusive rights
Præjudiciel — Cour administrative d'appel de Lyon — fortolkningen af artikel 19 i Rådets direktiv 77/388/EØF om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — det fælles merværdiafgiftsystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag — fradrag af indgående afgift — begrænsninger eller nedsættelse af fradraget af afgiften på hoved- og tjenesteydelser, som ikke er anvendt udelukkende til gennemførelse af afgiftspligtige transaktioner — medregning af indtægter fra fritagne transaktioner
Preliminary ruling - Cour Administrative d'Appel de Lyon - Interpretation of Article 19 of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment - Deduction of input tax -Restriction or reduction of the deduction of tax on goods or services not used exclusively in carrying out taxable transactions - Taking into account receipts relating to exempted financial transactions
Annulation af Rådets direktiv 94/43/EF om affattelsen af bilag VI til direktiv 91/414/EØF om markedsføring af plantebeskyttelsesmidler — tilsidesættelse af Parlamentets kompetencer
Annulment of Council Directive 94/43/EC establishing Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market ~ Infringement of the prerogatives of the European Parliament
Præjudiciel — Tribunal de commerce de Lyon — fortolkning af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 123/85 om anvendelse af EØF-traktatens artikel 85, stk. 3, på kategorier af salgs- og serviceaftaler vedrørende motorkøretøjer — spørgsmålet om lovligheden af en parallelimportørs virksomhed som videresælger
Case C-309/94 Nissan France and Others ν J.L. Dupasquier -Garage Sport Auto and Others Preliminary ruling - Tribunal de Commerce de Lyon - Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 123/85 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of motor vehicle distribution and servicing agreements -Lawfulness of a parallel-importer/reseller business
Erstatningssag - Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2187/93 om en godtgørelse til visse mælkeproducenter eller producenter af
Preliminary ruling - Tribunal de Commerce de Saintes - Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 123/85 on the application of Article 85(3) of the EEC Treaty to certain categories of motor vehicle distribution and servicing agreements ~ Lawfulness of the business of reselling "outside the official network"
Se sag T-363/94
Staff case
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning nr. 94/653/EF om forhøjelse af Air France's kapital
Action for damages - Council Regulation (EEC) No 2187/93 providing for an offer of compensation to certain producers of milk and milk products temporarily prevented from carrying on their trade
Sag T-372/94 PA.M. Kemp / Rådet og Kommissionen
Case T-365/94 R. Simon ν Council and Commission
Sag T-373/94 R.W. Werners / Rådet og Kommissionen
Case T-366/94 H. Diekmeier ν Council and Commission
Se sag T-363/94
See Case T-363/94
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Informationstjeneste (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Case T-373/94 R.W. Werners ν Council and Commission
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
This bulletin is issued by the Court's Information Service (L-2925 Luxembourg) to provide rapid information on the work or the Court However, it is only the text of the judgments and opinions published in the European Court Reports that is authentic.
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 2.12.1994 Katalognr. : DX-AC-94-031-DA-C
Original version: French Completed on 02.12.1994 Catalogue No: "DX-AC-94-031-EN-C"
Ugen 5. - 9. december 1994
5 to 9 December 1994
Sag T-450/93 Lisrestal — Organização Gestão de Restaurantes Colectivos, Ld." m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Socialpolitik
Case T-450/93 Lisrestal — Organização Gestão de Restaurantes Colectivos, Lda and Others v Commission of the European Communities Social policy
Retten i Første Instans' afgørelse om fastsættelse af retningslinjer for sagernes fordeling mellem afdelingerne
Case C-410/92 Elsie Rita Johnson v Chief Adjudication Officer Social policy
Præjudiciel »Bruxelles-konventionen — litispendens—indbyrdes sammenhængende krav —forholdet til den internationale konvention om arrest i søgående skibe· (Domstolens plenum)
Preliminary ruling (Brussels Convention — Lis pendens — Related actions Relationship with the International Convention relating to the arrest of seagoing ships) (Full Court) concerned with lis pendens, will be considered thereafter.
Ved kendelse af 5. juni 1992, indgået til Domstolen den 4. december 1992, har Court of Appeal stillet en række præjudicielle spørgsmål om fortolkningen af Bruxelleskonventionens artikel 21, 22 og 57.
Finally, the fourth question, which seeks an interpretation of Article 22 of the Convention, concerned with related actions, will be considered.
fortolkningen af konventionens artikel 21 om litispendens, blive behandlet Endelig behandles det fjerde spørgsmål, der vedrører fortolkningen af konventionens artikel 22 om indbyrdes sammenhængende krav.
By order of 5 June 1992, received at the Court on 4 December 1992, the Court of Appeal referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling several questions on the interpretation of Articles 21, 22 and 57 of the Brussels Convention.
I september 1988 blev en ladning soyaolie, der tilhørte forskellige ejere, befordret som bulklast om bord på skibet Tatry, der tilhører et polsk rederi, selskabet Zegluga Polska Spolka Akeyjna.
In September 1988 a cargo of soya bean oil belonging to a number of owners was carried in bulk aboard the vessel Tatry1, belonging to a Polish shipping company, Zegluga Polska Spolka Alceyjna.
Transporten fandt sted fra Brasilien og havde dels Rotterdam, dels Hamburg som bestemmelsessted.
The voyage was from Brazil to Rotterdam for part of the cargo and to Hamburg for the rest.
Ladningsejerne reklamerede over for skibets ejere over, at godset var blevet forurenet med diesel eller andre kulbrinter under transporten.
The cargo owners complained to the shipowners that in the course of the voyage the cargo was contaminated with diesel or other hydrocarbons.
Under hensyn til den indbyrdes sammenhæng mellem spørgsmålene, skal det tredje spørgsmål, der vedrører anvendelsesområdet for Bruxelles konventionen i forhold til konventioner på særlige områder, behandles først.
In the light of the interrelationship between the various questions referred, it is appropriate first to consider the third question, which concerns the scope of the Brussels Convention and of the special conventions.
Derefter vil første, femte og andet spørgsmål, der alle angår
The first, fifth and second questions, all three of which seek an interpretation of Article 21 of the Convention,
Det bemærkes, at der ved artikel 57 er indført en undtagelse fra den almindelige regel om, at konventionen har forrang i forhold til andre
Article 57 introduces an exception to the general rule that the Convention takes precedence over other conventions signed by the Contracting States on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments.
konventioner, de kontraherende stater har undertegnet vedrørende retternes kompetence samt anerkendelse og fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser.
Conventions, since in enacting those rules account was taken of the specific features of the matters to which they relate.
Det er korrekt at denne fortolkning af artikel 21 medfører, at sagen splittes op. Artikel 22 afbøder imidlertid denne ulempe.
Admittedly, that interpretation of Article 21 involves fragmenting the proceedings.
Ifølge denne artikel kan enhver anden ret end den, ved hvilken sagen først er anlagt som følge af kravenes indbyrdes sammenhæng, udsætte afgørelsen eller erklære sig inkompetent såfremt de i artiklen opstillede betingelser er opfyldt.
That article allows the second court seised to stay proceedings or to decline jurisdiction on the ground that the actions are related, if the conditions there set out are satisfied.
Det femte spørgsmål
The fifth question
Under hensyn til sit formål skal artikel 57 fortolkes således, at den alene udelukker, at Bruxelleskonventionens bestemmelser finder anvendelse på spørgsmål, der er reguleret i en specialkonvention.
That being its purpose, Article 57 must be understood as precluding the application of the provisions of the Brussels Convention solely in relation to questions governed by a specialized convention.
En anden fortolkning ville være uforenelig med konventionens formål, der ifølge dens præambel er inden for Fællesskabet at styrke retsbeskyttelsen for de dér bosiddende personer og at lette anerkendelsen af retsafgørelser for at sikre fuldbyrdelsen af sådanne afgørelser.
A contrary interpretation would be incompatible with the objective of the Convention which, according to its preamble, is to strengthen in the Community the legal protection of persons therein established and to facilitate recognition of judgments in order to secure their enforcement In those circumstances, when a specialized convention contains certain rules of jurisdiction but no provision as to to pendens or related actions, Articles 21 and 22 of the Brussels Convention apply.
Når en specialkonvention således indeholder bestemte kompetenceregler, men ikke regler om litispendens og indbyrdes sammenhængende krav, skal Bruxelles konventionens artikel 21 og 22 herefter finde anvendelse.
The national court's fifth question is essentially whether, on a proper construction of Article 21 of the Convention, an action seeking to have the defendant held liable for causing loss and ordered to pay damages has the same cause of action and the same object as earlier proceedings brought by that defendant seeking a declaration that he is not liable for that loss.