natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet CSjette Afdeling) den 5. marts 1998.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 5 March 1998.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare det forelagte spørgsmål således:
He proposed that the Court give the following answer to the National Court's questions:
»Det er udelukket at godkende et projekt, som er omhandlet i bilag I til Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning på miljøet, hvis ikke der inden godkendelsen er foretaget en sådan miljøvurdering som kræves efter direktivet, når godkendelsen vedrører et projekt, der allerede var blevet godkendt inden den 3. juli 1988, men godkendelsen ikke blev udnyttet, når der ikke er foretaget en miljøvurdering inden godkendelsen, som opfylder de i direktivet herom fastsatte krav, og når det må antages, at den nye godkendelse meddeles, hvis der udtrykkeligt på ny indgives ansøgning herom.«
'Council Directive 86/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment does not allow development consent for a project included in Annex 1 of the directive unless it has been preceded by an environmental impact study within the meaning of the directive, if the development consent relates to a project which had already obtained a development consent before 3 July 1988 but which was not preceded by an environmental impact study meeting the directive's requirements, which has not made use of this consent, and where there is reason to believe that a new development consent will be granted following a new formal application'.
Sag C-183/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Portugisiske Republik Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
Case C-183/97 Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic Environment and consumers
»Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende gennemførelse af direktiv 80/68/EØF* (Sjette Afdeling) idet den ikke straks har underrettet Kommissionen om disse foranstaltninger.
'Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to transpose Directive 80/68/EEC' (Sixth Chamber)
Den portugisiske regering har ikke bestridt det påståede traktatbrud for Domstolen, men har gjort gældende, at et lovdekret er under udarbejdelse, hvorved direktivet vil blive gennemført fuldt ud i national ret.
The Portuguese Government does not deny before the Court the infringement with which it is charged, but claims that a decree-law designed to complete the transposition of the Directive into domestic law is being adopted.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 12. maj 1997 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Portugisiske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 21, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 80/68/EØF af 17. december 1979 (herefter »direktivet«), principalt idet den har undladt at vedtage samtlige de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for fuldt ud og korrekt at efterkomme direktivet, særligt artikel 8, 9, 10, 11 og 15, og subsidiært
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 12 May 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully and properly with Council Directive 80/68/EEC of 17 December 1979 ('the Directive'), in particular with Articles 8,9,10,11 and 15 thereof, and, in the alternative, by failing to inform the Commission of such measures forthwith, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of the
Eftersom direktivet ikke er blevet gennemført inden for den fastsatte frist, er der grundlag for at give Kommissionen medhold i dens påstand.
Since transposition of the Directive was not completed within the prescribed period, the action brought in this connection by the Commission must be held to be well founded.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling') den 31. marts 1998.
Advocate General A La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 31 March 1998.
Han foreslog Domstolen:
He proposed that the Court:
Sag C-208/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Portugisiske Republik Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
Case C-208/97 Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic Environment and consumers
18. juni 1998 manglende gennemførelse inden for den
'Failure to fulfil obligations — Directive prescribed period'(Sixth Chamber)
»Traktatbrudssøgsmål - direktiv 84/156/EØF fastsatte frist* (Sjette Afdeling)
Treaty and under the Directive.
Den Portugisiske Republik har ikke bestridt det påståede traktatbrud.
The Portuguese Government does not deny that it has failed to fulfil its obligations.
Den har understreget, at den har bestræbt sig på at overkomme de vanskeligheder, den er stødt på under opstillingen af de særlige programmer for kviksølvudledning i henhold til direktivets artikel 4, særligt for så vidt angår identifikationen af de mange og forskelligartede kilder.
It points out that it has made an effort to overcome the difficulties it encountered in drawing up the specific programmes for mercury discharges required by Article 4 of the Directive, particularly as regards the identification of the many different sources.
På trods af disse bestræbelser er der dog stadig vanskeligheder med at fuldføre arbejdet med den endelige opstilling af programmerne som følge af deres komplicerede karakter.
However, despite its efforts, the complex nature of the work required to draw up the definitive programmes means that its completion still poses certain difficulties.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 30. maj 1997 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Portugisiske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 189, stk 3, og bestemmelserne i Rådets direktiv 84/156/EØF af 8. marts 1984 (herefter »direktivet«), principalt, fordi den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har vedtaget alle de love og administrative bestemmelser, som er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivets bestemmelser, og nærmere bestemt ved ikke at opstille de i direktivet fastsatte særlige programmer, subsidiært, fordi den ikke straks har givet Kommissionen meddelelse om disse foranstaltninger.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 30 May 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to adopt within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 84/156/EEC of 8 March 1984 (hereinafter 'the Directive'), and, in particular, by failing to draw up the specific programmes required by the Directive, and in the alternative, by failing forthwith to inform the Commission of such measures, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the third paragraph of Article 189 of the EC
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 2. april 1998.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 2 April 1998.
»1) at fastslå, at Den Portugisiske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 4 i Rådets direktiv 84/156/EØF af 8. marts 1984 om grænseværdier og kvalitetsmålsætninger for udledninger af kviksølv fra andre sektorer end elektrolyse af alkalichlorider, idet den ikke har truffet de til efterkommeise af direktivet nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser inden for den fastsatte frist;
(1) declare that, by failing to adopt within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions needed to comply with Council Directive 84/156/EEC of 8 March 1984 on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by sectors other than the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 of the directive;
Sag T-174/95 Svenska Journalistforbundet / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Regler for institutionerne
Case T-174/95 Svenska Journalistförbundet v Council of the European Union Law governing the institutions
Aktindsigt — Rådets afgørelse 93/731/EF — afslag på anmodning om aktindsigt i Rådets dokumenter—annullationssøgsmål —formaliteten — afsnit VI i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union — rækkevidden af undtagelsen af hensyn til beskyttelse af den offentlige sikkerhed — Rådets hemmelige forhandlinger — begrundelse — offentliggørelse af svarskriftet på Internettet — unødig trætte (Fjerde Udvidede Afdeling)
'Access to information — Council Decision 93173IIEC — Refusal of an application f or access to Council documents — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Title VI of the Treaty on European Union — Scope of the exception concerning the protection of public security — Confidentiality of the Council's proceedings — Statement of reasons — Publication of the defence on the Internet — Abuse of procedure' (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition)
•1) Rådets afgørelse af 6. juli 1995 om ikke at give sagsøgeren aktindsigt i visse dokumenter vedrørende Den Europæiske Politienhed (Europol) annulleres.
In order to put that undertaking into effect, the Council adopted on 20 December 1993 Decision 93/731/EC on public access to Council documents (hereinafter 'Decision 93/131'), the aim of which
Rådet bærer sine egne omkostninger og betaler to tredjedele af sagsøgerens omkostninger.
On 6 December 1993 the Council and the Commission approved a Code of Conduct concerning public access to Council and
3) Kongeriget Danmark, Den Franske Republik, Kongeriget Nederlandene, Kongeriget Sverige og Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland bærer deres egne omkostninger.* *
Furthermore, certain passages in the documents to which access was granted had been deleted. In some documents it was difficult to ascertain whether passages had been deleted or not.
»Aftalen om social- og arbejdsmarkedspolitikken — annullation af et direktiv —formaliteten — arbejdsmarkedets parters stilling under proceduren forud for vedtagelsen af direktivet — arbejdsmarkedets parters repræsentativitet* (Fjerde Udvidede Afdeling)
By letter dated 1 June 1995, the Council's General Secretariat allowed access to two documents only, those being documents which contained communications by the future French Presidency of its priorities in the field of asylum and immigration and in the field of justice.
2) Sagsøgeren og de parter, der har interveneret til støtte for sagsøgeren, betaler Rådets omkostninger.
Article 4(2) adds that '[ajccess to a Council document may be refused in order to protect the confidentiality of the Council's proceedings.'
Sag C-67/97 Anklagemyndigheden / Ditlev Bluhme
The written procedure was suspended in the meantime.
Præjudiciel - Kriminalretten i Frederikshavn — fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 30 og 36 og af Rådets direktiv 91/174/EØF af 25. marts 1991 om de zootekniske og genealogiske betingelser for
Following Sweden's accession to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the applicant decided to test the way in which the Swedish authorities applied Swedish citizens' right of access to information in respect of documents relating to European Union activities.
handel med racerene dyr og om ændring af direktiv 77/504/EØF og 90/425/EØF - national bestemmehe om forbud mod, at biavlere inden for et naturligt afgrænset område holder visse biracer — Læsø — Apis mellifera mellifera
The first page of the application refers to both Tidningen Journalisten and 'Svenska Journalistförbundets tidning'.
Kommissionen havde truffet til bekæmpelse af svinepest i Tyskland — kontradiktionsretten og forpligtelsen til at begrunde en dom — Kommissionens erstatningsansvar udenfor kontrakt med hensyn til en beslutning om afgrænsning af det territoriale anvendelsesområde for forbud (mod transport og salg mv.) til bekæmpelse af en epidemi (klassisk svinepest) - generel retsakt eller forvaltningsakt
In this case the issue as to admissibility raised by the French and United Kingdom Governments does involve an absolute bar to proceeding in that it turns upon the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the application. It can accordingly be examined by the Court of its own motion.
Generaladvokat N. Fenneliv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Femte Afdeling) den 16. juni 1998.
The proof of authority granted to the applicant's lawyers as required by Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure was signed on behalf of the Swedish Journalists' Union by Lennart Lund, Editor in Chief of the magazine Tidningen Journalisten.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare spørgsmålene således:
In those circumstances it is clear that the application has, in reality, been brought by the Swedish Journalists' Union as proprietor of Tidningen Journalisten.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 16. juni 1998.
In this regard, Decision 93/731, in Articles 1(2) and 2(2), expressly provides that it is to apply to all Council documents.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
Decision 93/731 therefore applies irrespective of the contents of the documents requested.
Sagsøgerne tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.«
In the absence of any provision to the contrary in Decision 93/731 itself, its provisions apply to documents relating to Title VI of the EU Treaty.
Sag C-285/96 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
The applicant's interest in seeking annulment
Sådanne bestemmelser kan være berettigede som forebyggende foranstaltninger, selv om der ikke består en umiddelbar fare for udryddelse af den beskyttede population.«
It need only prove that it has an interest in the annulment of the decision.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 18. juni 1998.
Decision 93/731 is a measure which confers on citizens rights of access to documents held by the Council.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
Decision 93/731, like Decision 94/90, does not require that members of the public must put forward reasons for seeking access to requested documents.
Sag C-221/97 Ρ Aloys Schröder m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
There are two categories of exception to the principle of general access for citizens to Council documents set out in Article 4 of Decision 93/731.
Det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EF-traktaten ved i strid med artikel 7 i Rådets direktiv 76/464/EØF af 4. maj 1976 om forurening, der er forårsaget af udledning af visse farlige stoffer i Fællesskabets vandmiljø ikke at have fastlagt programmer til formindskelse af forureningen med angivelse af kvalitetsmålsætninger for de 99 farlige stoffer, som er opført i bilaget til
The duty to state reasons in individual decisions has the double purpose of permitting, on the one hand, interested parties to know the reasons for
Appel af dom afsagt af Retten (Femte Afdeling) den 15. april 1997 i sag T-390/94, Aloys Schröder m.fL mod Kommissionen — frifindehe for påstand om erstatning af tab, det blev gjort gældende var forvoldt af en række foranstaltninger,
It follows that a person who is refused access to a document or to part of a document has, by virtue of that very fact, established an interest in the annulment of the decision.
Kommissionens stævning, og ved ikke i sammenfattet form at have givet Kommissionen meddelelse om programmerne samt resultaterne af deres gennemførelse.
the adoption of the measure so that they can protect their own interests and, on the other hand, enabling the Community court to exercise its jurisdiction to review the validity of the decision.
I øvrigt frifindes sagsøgte.
no entitlement to grant access to the documents.
77/388/EØF: Rådets sjette direktiv af 17. maj 1977 om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag — opretholdelse af visse fritagelser i en overgangsperiode — tjenesteydelser, der leveres af indehavere af ophavsrettigheder —fortolkningen af artikel 17, stk. 2, i sjette momsdirektiv —fradragsret for indgående afgift
Moreover, given that the Council considered that it was entitled to grant access to these two documents, having first balanced the interests involved, it follows that the Council must necessarily have considered that all of the documents relating to Title VI did not automatically fall within the scope of the first exception based upon the protection of the public interest (public security).
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 18. juni 1998.
The statement of reasons for a decision refusing access to a document must therefore contain — at least for each category of documents concerned — the particular reasons for which the Commission considers that disclosure of the requested documents comes within the scope of one of the exceptions provided for in Decision 93/731.
Præjudiciel — Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Firenze —fortolkningen af direktiv 69/335/EØF om kapitaltilførselsafgifter — national bestemmelse om afgift på kapitalselskabers nettoformue, der økonomisk svarer til virkningerne af en kapitaltilførsehafgift
In fact, Mr Elsen's note clearly shows that it was possible to give an indication of the reasons why certain documents could not be disclosed to the applicant without at the same time disclosing their contents.
Et produktionsselskabs overdragelse af rettigheder til forevisning af biograffilm er ikke omfattet af anvendelsesområdet for den fritagelse i en overgangsperiode, som der er truffet bestemmelse om i artikel 28, stk. 3, litra b), i Rådets sjette direktiv 77/388/EØF af 17. maj 1977 om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag sammenholdt med punkt 2 i bilag F til direktivet.
Although the Council was at once invoking both the mandatory exception based upon the protection of the public interest (public security) and also the discretionary exception based upon protection of the confidentiality of its proceedings, it did not specify whether it was invoking both exceptions in respect of all of the documents refused or whether it considered that some documents were covered by the first exception while others were covered by the second.
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 18. juni 1998.
Finally, so far as concerns the exception in favour of the protection of the confidentiality of its proceedings, the Council did not specifically indicate in the contested decision that all of the documents included in the applicant's request were covered by the exception based upon the protection of the public interest.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare spørgsmålet på følgende måde:
The applicant could not therefore rule out the possibility that access to some of the documents in question was being refused because they were covered only by the exception based upon the protection of the confidentiality of its proceedings.
Særligt følger det af artikel 2, stk 1, artikel 6, stk. 1, og artikel 17 i Rådets sjette direktiv, at når der sker momspligtig overdragelse af enerettigheder til forevisning af biograffilm, kan disse bestemmelser påberåbes over for nationale skattemyndigheder, der afslår at godkende en momsopgørelse, hvori momsdelen af de varer og tjenesteydelser, der er anvendt til produktion af de pågældende film, er fradraget i den moms, der skulle have indgået i prisen for overdragelse af disse rettigheder.
The terms of the contested decision do not, however, permit the applicant and, therefore, the Court to check whether the Council has complied with its duty to carry out a genuine balancing of the interests concerned as the application of Article 4(2) of Decision 93/731 requires.
»Direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969 om kapitaltilførselsafgifter som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 85/303/EØF af 10. juni 1985 om ændring af direktiv 69/335/EØF er ikke til hinder for, at der hos kapitalselskaber opkræves en afgift som den årlige afgift af selskabers nettoformue, der er indført ved Den Italienske Republiks lovdekret nr. 394 af 30. september 1992.«
In fact, the contested decision mentions only the fact that the requested documents related to proceedings of the Council, including the views expressed by members of the Council, without saying whether it had made any comparative analysis which sought to balance, on the one hand, the interest of the citizens seeking the information and, on the other hand, the
Når en momspligtig har undladt at pålægge udgående moms ved beregning af prisen for overdragelse af enerettigheder til forevisning af biograffilm, er dette uden betydning for den ret, som tilkommer den pågældende momspligtige, der har foretaget de pågældende overdragelser, til i den moms, den pågældende skulle have betalt af disse overdragelser, at fradrage momsdelen af de varer og tjenesteydelser,
In that respect, the Court notes that although the initial refusal contained in the letter of 1 June 1995 was based only upon 'the principle of confidentiality as set out in Article 4(1) of Decision 93/731' the Council was nevertheless able to grant access to two further documents in the course of its consideration of the confirmatory request, namely a report on the activities of the Europol Drugs Unit (document No 4533/95) and a provisional agenda for a meeting of Committee K.4 (document No 4135/95), documents clearly relating to the activities of the Council within the scope of Title VI of the EU Treaty.
han har fået leveret til produktionen af de film, der blev overdraget.« begrænsning af støjemissionen fra hydrauliske gravemaskiner, gravemaskiner med tove, dozere og læssere samt gravelæssemaskiner (EFT L 168, s. 14)
In the present case, it is clear that the actions of the applicant in publishing an edited version of the defence on the Internet in conjunction with an invitation to the public to send their comments to the Agents of the Council and in providing the telephone and telefax numbers of those Agents, had as their purpose to bring pressure to bear upon the Council and to provoke public criticism of the Agents of the institution in the performance of their duties.
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 18. juni 1998.
Moreover, the first reply from the Council — sent to the applicant in French although the applicant had written the initial request in German — confined itself to citing the provisions of Article 4(1) of Decision 93/731, in support of its view that the documents were subject to 'the principle of confidentiality".
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — mangelfuld anvendelse af artikel 7 i Rådets direktiv 76/464/EØF af 4. maj 1976 om forurening der er forårsaget af udledning af visse farlige stoffer i Fællesskabets vandmiljø — manglende fastlæggelse af programmer til formindskelse af forureningen
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Improper application of Council Directive 76/464/EEC on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community (OJ1976 L 129, p. 23) — Failure to adopt programmes to reduce pollution
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Sjette Afdeling) den 18. juni 1998.
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 18 June 1998.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
He recommended that the Court answer as follows: