natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Begrebet 'almene hensyn' (på italiensk 'interesse generale'), som Domstolen har anvendt i dommene Reiff og Delta, svarer til det tilsvarende begreb (på italiensk 'interesse pubblico'), som Domstolen har anvendt i dommen Centro Servizi Spediporto i en tilsvarende retlig situation.
Preliminary ruling - Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg — Interpretation ofArt. 52 of the EC Treaty andArt 3 of Council Directive 64/427/EEC of 7 July 1964 laying down detailed provisions concerning transitional measures in respect of activities of selfemployed persons in manufacturing and processing industries f ailing within ISIC Major Groups 23-40 (Industry and small craft industries) — Proof that a small craft activity was actually carried on in the Member State of origin -Certificate covering a period in which several activities were carried on simultaneously (within the meaning of the legislation of the Member State of establishment)
Det er overladt til medlemsstaternes kompetence at definere begrebet 'almene hensyn' og at kontrollere, at disse hensyn iagttages i praksis.
Advocate General P. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 5 March 1998.
»Domstolens besvarelse af de spørgsmål, som er forelagt i sag C-20/96, Snares, ved dom af 4. november 1997, er uændret for så vidt angår en person, der, som sagsøgeren i hovedsagen, elier den 1. juni 1992 dvs. datoen for ikrafttrædelsen af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1247/92 al 30. april 1992 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet - opfylder betingelserne for at få tildelt en 'attendance allowance' (plejetilskud).
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows: declare that, by introducing and maintaining in force cargo-sharing arrangements, in the Agreement between the Belgo-Luxembourg Economic Union and Malaysia which was approved by Belgium and entered into force after 1 January 1987, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries;
Det tilkommer den nationale ret at afklare, om de nationale regler faktisk forhindrer karteldannelser, om almenvellet faktisk iagttages, og om de offentlige myndigheder ikke har overdraget deres beføjelser til private erhvervsdrivende. Den nationale rets afgørelse skal være orienteret med henblik på, at der tilvejebringes sådanne rammer for konkurrencen, som er fastsat i fællesskabsretten og i national ret.«
- declare that by introducing and maintaining in force cargo-sharing arrangements, in the Agreement between the Belgo-Luxembourg Economic Union and Malaysia which was approved by Belgium and entered into force after 1 January 1987, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries;
Forenede sager C-176/97 og C-177/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Belgien
- order the Kingdom of Belgium and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4055/86 af 22. december 1986 om anvendelse af princippet om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser inden for søtransport mellem medlemsstaterne indbyrdes og mellem medlemsstaterne og tredjelande (EFT L 378, s. 1) - forbud mod arrangementer om lastfordeling - søfartsaftale mellem Den Belgisk-Luxembourgske Økonomiske Union og Malaysia
It is contrary to Article 3 of Council Directive 64/427/EEC of 7 July 1964 laying down detailed provisions concerning transitional measures in respect of activities of selfemployed persons in manufacturing and processing industries falling within ISIC Major Groups 23-40 (Industry and small craft industries) for a Community national presenting to the authorities of the host Member State the certificate by which the competent authority of the Member State of origin declares that he had carried on several trades at the same time during the reasonable period laid down for his situation and that that activity had not come to an end more than ten years earlier to be refused a licence to exercise one part of those trades on the ground that, in the host Member State, they are treated as principal and separate trades, and the authorities of that Member State consider that the condition of a reasonable period of activity must be satisfied for each of those trades separately.
Han foreslog Domstolen
Case C-291/97 H ν Commission of the European Communities
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 5. marts 1998.
Appeal against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) on 3 June 1997 in Case T-196/95 Η ν Commission — Procedure for invaliding an official out of the service for reasons relating to her mental health legislation granting exemption from an assessment of effects in the case of the renewal of the authorization procedure for a project previously authorized but not carried out - Construction of a port
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 5 March 1998.
Sag C-291/97 H / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
(1) The contested judgment of 3 June 1997 in Case T-196/95 is set aside;
Appel tilprøvehe af Rettens dom (Tredje Afdeling) afsagt den 3. juni 1997 i sag T-196/95, H mod Kommissionen-procedureforinvalidepensionering af en tjenestemand på grund af hans psykiske helbred
(3) The Commission is ordered to pay all the costs incurred in both sets of proceedings.
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse - Tribunal administratif de Luxembourg - fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 52 og artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 64/427/EØF af 7. juli 1964 om de nærmere overgangsforanstaltninger for selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed inden for de be- og forarbejdende erhverv under CITI-hovedgruppeme 23-40 (industri og håndværk) (EFT 1964, s. 139)
Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment does not permit consent to be granted for a project mentioned in Annex I to the directive where no environmental study was carried out, in accordance with the directive, before consent was granted, and where the consent in question relates to a project for which consent had been granted before 3 July 1988, but no use was made of that consent and no environmental impact assessment satisfying the requirements of the directive was conducted, and where there is every reason to suppose that fresh consent will be granted when another application is formally submitted.
Han foreslog Domstolen at afsige følgende dom: håndværksvirksomhed i oprindelsesmedlemsstaten — attest for en periode, hvor den pågældende har
Preliminary ruling — Nederlandse Raad van State — Interpretation of Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — National
Den anfægtede dom, som er afsagt den 3. juni 1997 i sag T-196/97 ophæves.
Case T-316/97 Hermínia Fernanda Antas ν Council
udøvet flere erhverv samtidig efter lovgivningen i etableringslandet
Action for damages to compensate for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant in its activities as 'commissionnaire agréé en douane'
Kommissionens afgørelse af 27. september 1994, hvorved sagsøgeren blev pensioneret uden ansøgning, annulleres.
Annulment of Articles 2 and 4 of Commission Decision C(97) 3036 of 6 October 1997 relating to a proceeding under Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty (IV/35.860 - steel tubes)
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse Nederlandenes Hoge Raad —fonolkning af Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning på miljøet — national lovgivning som fritager for en undersøgehe af miljøindvirkningen, når en procedure for godkendelse af et projekt, som tidligere er blevet godkendt, men ikke gennemført, gentages — anlæg af en havn
Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1931/97 of 22 September 1997 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of unwrought, unalloyed zinc originating in Poland and Russia and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare det forelagte spørgsmål således:
Case T-598/97 BSC Footwear Supplies Ltd and Others ν Council
»Det er udelukket at godkende et projekt, som er omhandlet i bilag I til Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om vurdering af
Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 2155/97 of 29 October 1997 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with textile uppers originating in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed
Retten eller passende kompensations overgangsforanstaltninger
Case T-605/97 Ditta Autotrasporti Commission
Sag T-316/97 Hermínia Fernanda Antas / Rådet
Case T-606/97 Zootrans Sne ν Commission
Se sag T-600/97
See Case T-600/97
Se sag T-600/97
Case T-608/97 Onno Plug ν Commission
Se sag T-600/97
Staff case
Annihilation af Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 2155/97 af 29. oktober 1997 om indførelse af en endelig antidumpingtold på indførsel af visse typer fodtøj med overdel af tekstilmaterialer og med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina og Indonesien og om endelig opkrævning af den midlertidige antidumpingtold
Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1979/97 of 10 October 1997 fixing the estimated production of olive oil and the amount of the unit production aid that may be paid in advance for the 1996/97 marketing year (L 1997 278, p. 12)
Se sag T-600/97
See Case T-614/97
Se sag T-600/97
Case T-617/97
overgangsforanstaltninger inden for rammerne af den fælles markedsordning for bananer
Société d'exploitation Alma transitaires SA and Others ν Council
Sag T-610/97 Hanne Norup Carlsen ni.11. / Rådet
Case T-619/97 Transport Wybo Ν V ν Council
Se sag T-614/97
See Case T-614/97
Erstatningssøgsmål med påstand om erstatning af den skade, sagsøgeren hævder at have lidt i forbindelse med sin virksomhed som toldklarerer på grund af gennemførelsen af det indre marked, som blev indført ved den europæiske fælles akt, uden at Fællesskabets institutioner har truffet passende kompensations- eller overgangsforanstaltninger
Application for taxation of the costs ordered in the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 1997
Sag T-616/97 Hovelaque Transports SARL m.fl. / Rådet
Case T-621/97 J.Grayet and G. Heidner SPRL ν Council
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning K(97) 3274 endelig udg. af 24. oktober 1997 om afslag på sagsøgerens ansøgning om vedtagelse af
Annulment of Decision N° C(97)2735 of the Commission of 30 July 1997 relating to the aid granted by the Regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia to road hauliers
Se sag T-614/97
Case T-2/98
Se sag T-614/97
See Case T-l/98
Sag T-115/94 (92) Opel Austria GmbH / Rådet
Case T-10/98 Equattro Sne ν Commission
Begæring om fastsættelse af sagsomkostninger som følge af Retlens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) al 22. januar 1997
Action for damages seeking compensation for damage caused by the failure to pay for services supplied under a contract concluded with the Commission and by termination of that contract
Begæring om fastsættelse af sagsomkostninger som følge af Rettens dom (Første Udvidede Afdeling) af 5. november 1997
Application for compensation for damage allegedly suffered as a result of the refusal of the Community legislature to allocate to the applicant a special reference quantity.
Sag T-623/97 Ziegler SA / Rådet
Case T-6/98 Autotrasporti Di Viola Claudio & C. Sne ν Commission Case T-12/98 Argon Sri and Others ν Council
Se sag T-614/97
Case T-8/98 Siderea SAIC ν Commission
Sag T-9/98 Mitteldeutsche Kommissionen sagsøgerens ansøgning om tilbagebetaling af den skat til Fællesskaberne, som er indeholdt i hendes indtægter som freelancetolk siden 1989, samt konstatering af, at artikel 8 i aftalen mellem Association internationale des interprètes de conférence (AIIC) og visse fællesskabsinstitutioner er retsstridig, dels krav om erstatning
See Case T-12/98 comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-199/91 Foyer Culturel du Sart-Tüman SARL ν Commission [1993] ECR 1-2689, annulling certain decisions to reduce financial assistance originally granted to the applicant by the European Social Fund
Se sag T-l/98
Case T-14/98 Heidi Hautala ν Council
Erstatningssøgsmål med påstand om erstatning al det tab, sagsøgeren hævder at have lidt dels som følge af, at Kommissionen ikke har betalt de ydelser, sagsøgeren har leveret i henhold til en mellem parterne indgået kontrakt, dels som følge af kontraktens ophævelse
Annulment of the Council's decision of 4 November 1997 rejecting the application made by the applicant in accordance with Council Decision 93/731/EC of 20 December 1993 on public access to Council documents in order to gain access to a report of the Council Working Group on Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) 'Exports of conventional arms', approved on 14 and 15 November 1996
Se sag T-l/98
Case T-15/98 Centre d'action culturelle régionale du Sart-Tilman ν Commission
Erstatningssøgsmål med påstand om erstatning af det tab, sagsøgeren hævder at have lidt ved, at fællesskabslovgiver har afslået at tildele denne en særlig referencemængde
Compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission's failure to adopt the measures necessary to
Redaktionen afsluttet den 6.3.1998 Katalognr.: DX-AC-98-0007-DA-C
Original version: French Completed on 13.3.98 Catalogue No: DX-AC-98-007-EN-C
Ugen 9.
9 to 13 March 1998
SagC-344/96 12 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland Landbrug
Case C-344/96 11 Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany Agriculture
Sag C-163/97
Case C-214/97 20 Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic
Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Belgien Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Joined Cases C-129/97 and C-130/97 Procureur de la République ν Yvon Chiciak and Fromagerie Chiciak and Jean-Pierre Fol
Sag C-214/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Portugisiske Republik
Case C-3/97 Regina ν John Charles Goodwin and Edward Thomas Unstead
Sag C-301/95 23 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland
Case C-301/95 21 Commission of the European Communities ν Federal Republic of Germany
Sag C-213/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Portugisiske Republik
Case C-213/97 21 Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic
Sag C-122/95 Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Forbindelserne udadtil
Case C-122/95 Federal Republic of Germany ν Council of the European Union External relations
10. marts 1998
10 March 1998
»Rammeaftale om bananer (Domstolens plenum)
(Framework Agreement on (Full Court)
Den 28. og 29. marts 1994 nåede Fællesskabet til en ordning med Republikken Columbia, Republikken Costa Rica, Republikken Nicaragua og Republikken Venezuela i form af rammeaftalen.
Republic of Nicaragua and the Republic of Venezuela, in the form of the Framework Agreement.
Ved stævning indleveret på Domstolens Justitskontor den 10. april 1995 har Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland anlagt sag med pastand om annullation af artikel 1, slk. 1, første led i Rådets afgørelse 94/800/EF af 22. december 1994 (herefter »den anfægtede afgørelse«), idet Rådet herved har godkendt indgåelsen af Fællesskabets rammeaftale med Republikken Costa Rica, Republikken Columbia, Republikken Nicaragua og Republikken Venezuela om bananer (herefter »rammeaftalen«).
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 10 April 1995, the Federal Republic of Germany brought an action for annulment of the first indent of Article 1(1) of Council Decision 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994 (hereinafter 'the contested decision'), to the extent that the Council thereby approved the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Bananas with the Republic of Costa Rica, the Republic of Colombia, the Republic of Nicaragua and the Republic of Venezuela (hereinafter 'the Framework Agreement').
I punkt 2 fastsætter rammeaftalen de procentdele af dette kontingent, der tildeles henholdsvis Columbia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua og Venezuela. Disse stater får 49,4% af det samlede kontingent.
In point 2, the Framework Agreement lays down the percentages of that quota allocated to Colombia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Venezuela respectively.
I punkt 6 hedder det, at
Point 6 provides:
Ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 af 13. februar 1993 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer er der i forordningens afsnit IV indført en fælles ordning for samhandelen med tredjelande, som erstaller de tidligere forskellige nationale ordninger.
Title IV of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market in bananas substituted a common regime governing trade with third countries for the various national regimes previously in force.
»leverandørlande, for hvilke der er lasisai ci kontingeni, kan udsiedc særlige eksportlitcn.ser på indtil 70% al deres kontingeni.
'the supplying countries with country quotas may deliver special export certificates for up to 70% of their quota, which, in turn, constitute a prerequisite for the issuance, by the Community, of certificates for the importation of bananas from said countries by "Category A" and "Category C" operators.'
Kommissionen har udstedt forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 af 10. juni 1993 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for EF's importordning for bananer.
The Commission adopted Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 of 10 June 1993 laying down detailed rules for the application of the arrangements for importing bananas into the Community.
I denne forordning gengives fordelingen af toldkontingentet mellem de tre kategorier af erhvervsdrivende, der benævnes »kategori Α, Β og C«.
That regulation reproduces the above allocation of the tariff quota among the three categories of operators, referred to as 'Categories A, Β and C'.
I punkt 7 fastsættes toldsatsen inden for kontingentet til 75 ECU pr. ton.
On 28 and 29 March 1994 the Community came to an arrangement with the Republic of Colombia, the Republic of Costa Rica, the
pågældende tredjelande pä "SVA i forhold (il den pris, som betales af de sidstnævnte.
concessions. GATT 1994 in turn constitutes Annex IA to the Agreement establishing the Word Trade Organisation (hereinafter 'the WTO').
Rammeaftalens punkt 1 og 7 er indsat i bilag LXXX til GATT 1994, som indeholder en liste over Fællesskabets toldindrømmelser. GATT 1994 udgør igen bilag 1 A til overenskomsten om oprettelse af verdenshandelsorganisationen (herefter »WTO«).
By judgment of 5 October 1994 in Germany ν Council [1994], the Court dismissed the action brought by the Federal Republic of Germany for the annulment of Regulation No 404/93.
Ved dom af 5. oktober 1994, Tyskland mod Rådet, frifandt Domstolen Rådet i det annullationssøgsmål, som Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland havde anlagt til prøvelse af forordning nr. 404/93.
above, the common organisation of the market in bananas, as established by Regulation No 404/93, and in particular the system of tariff-quota allocation, involves certain restrictions or differences of treatment detrimental to Category A and C operators, whose opportunities for importing bananas from third countries have thereby been restricted, whereas Category Β operators, who had previously been obliged to market essentially Community and ACP bananas, have gained an opportunity to import specified quantities of third-country bananas.
Den 22. december 1994 vedtog Rådet enstemmigt den anfægtede afgørelse.
On 22 December 1994 the Council unanimously adopted the contested decision:
I denne forbindelse skal det fremhæves, al Domstolen i den førnævnte dom i sagen Tyskland mod Rådet har anerkendt, at den fælles markedsordning for bananer, som den er indført ved forordning nr. 404/93, navnlig dens fordelingsordning for toldkontingentet, omfatter visse restriktioner eller former for forskelsbehandling til skade for de erhvervsdrivende i kategori A og C, hvis muligheder for at indføre bananer fra tredjelande begrænses, mens de erhvervsdrivende i kategori B, som indtil da var henvist til hovedsagelig at forhandle fællesskabsbananer og AVS-bananer, får mulighed for at indføre bestemte mængder tredjelandsbananer.
The Federal Republic of Germany, supported by the Kingdom of Belgium, claims that the regime introduced by the Framework Agreement impairs fundamental rights of Category A and C operators, namely their freedom to pursue a trade or business and their right to property, and discriminates against them as compared with Category Β operators.
Anbringendet om krænkelse af den almindelige grundsætning om forbud mod forskelsbehandling
The plea alleging breach of the general principle of non-discrimination
Domstolen har fastslået, at en sådan differentieret behandling ikke er strid med det almindelige forbud mod forskelsbehandling, da den står i sammenhæng med formålet, nemlig en integration af hidtil opdelte markeder, når del lages i betragtning, al disse forskellige kategorier af erhvervsdrivende befandt sig i en forskellig situation, før den fælles markedsordning blev indført, og al forfølgelsen af dennes formal, som er at sikre afsætningen af fællesskabsproduktionen og den traditionelle AVS-produktion, indebærer, at der indføres en vis balance mellem de berørte kategorier af erhvervsdrivende.
The Court held that such a difference in treatment is not contrary to the general principle of non-discrimination in so far as it is inherent in the objective of integrating previously compartmentalised markets, bearing in mind the different situations of the various categories of economic operators before the establishment of the common organisation of the market, and that pursuit of the objective of the common organisation, which is to guarantee disposal of Community production and traditional ACP production, entails the striking of a balance between the various categories of economic operators in question.
Hvad angår den forskellige behandling, der består i fritagelse af de erhvervsdrivende i kategori Β fra ordningen med eksportlicenser, kan det uden videre fastslås, at den ikke er den automatiske følge af en forskellig behandling af nogle tredjelande i forhold til behandlingen af andre.
As to the exemption of Category Β operators from the export-licence system, that difference in treatment is not, it must be noted at the outset, the automatic consequence of any difference of treatment of some third countries as compared with others.
Denne forskellige behandling følger af, at der blandt de fællesskabserhvervsdrivende, der har knyttet handelsforbindelse med tredjelandene, som er omfattet af ordningen med eksportlicenser for indførsler fra disse lande, er nogle, der har pligt til at skaffe sig eksportlicenser, mens andre er fritaget herfor.
That difference in treatment derives from the fact that, among the Community operators who have entered into commercial relations with third countries imports from which are subject to the export-licence system, some arc under an obligation to obtain export licences whilst others arc exempt from that requirement.
For det første har de erhvervsdrivende i kategori B, på samme måde som de erhvervsdrivende i kategori A og C, fordel af forhøjelsen af kontingentet og den samtidige nedsættelse af tolden, som ifølge Rådet og Kommissionen er årsagen til forrykkelsen af ligevægten mellem de forskellige berørte kategorier erhvervsdrivende.
Category Β operators therefore benefit, in the same way as Category A and C operators, from the quota increase and the concomitant lowering of customs duties which, according to the Council and the Commission, are the cause of the disturbance of the balance between the various categories of operator concerned.