natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Efter Domslolcns praksis finder direkiivet derimod ikke anvendelse på personer, som aldrig har slået til rådighed for arbejdsmarkedet, eller som har ophørt med at gøre det, uden at årsagen er, at en af de i direktivet nævnie risici er indirådt.
In contrast, according to the Court's case-law, the directive does not apply to persons who have never been available for employment or who have ceased to be available for a reason other than the materialization of one of the risks referred to by the directive.
Ubetydelig beskæftigelse er ikke omfattet af lovbestemt pensionsforsikring.
In this case the German Government argues, in particular, that the exclusion of persons in minor employment from compulsory insurance corresponds to a structural principle of the German social security scheme.
Den tyske regering har anføn, al personer med ubetydelig beskæftigelse ikke tilhører den erhvervsaktive befolkning i direktivets artikel 2's forstand, idet de navnlig ikke er i stand til al leve af den beskedne indtægt, de opnår derved.
The German Government argues that persons in minor employment are not part of the working population, in particular because the small earnings which they receive from such employment are not sufficient to satisfy their needs.
Ved ubetydelig beskæftigelse forstås beskæftigelse med en sædvanlig ugentlig arbejdstid på under femten limer mod el sædvanligt vederlag på indtil en syvendedel al referenccmånedslønnen det senest foregående år for personer, der er omfattet al den lovbestemte pensionsforsikring.
The Court observes that, in the current state of Community law, social policy is a matter for the Member States.
Delie synspunkt kan ikke lægges til grund.
That argument cannot be upheld.
Den omstændighed, at arbejdstagerens indtægl ikke kan dække samtlige den pågældendes behov, kan ikke bevirke, al han ikke tilhører den erhvervsaktive befolkning.
The fact that a worker's earnings do not cover all his needs cannot prevent him from being a member of the working population.
Det fremgår nemlig af Domstolens praksis, al en lønnet beskæftigelse, hvorved der opnås en løn, der er mindre end eksistensminimum, eller hvorved arbejdstiden
It appears from the Court's case-law that the fact that his employment yields an income lower than the minimum required for subsistence or normally does not exceed 18 hours a week or 12 hours a week or even 10 hours a week does not prevent the person in such employment from being regarded as a worker within the meaning of Article 48.
Det bemærkes i den forbindelse, at Domstolen har fastslået, at begrebet »arbejdstager eller dermed ligestillet person«, som er anvendt i Rådets forordning nr. 3 af 25. september 1958 på samme måde som udtrykket »arbejdskraft« i artikel 48-51 har en fællesskabsretlig betydning.
'Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions under which employment regularly consisting of fewer than 15 hours' work a week and regularly attracting remuneration of up to one-seventh of the average monthly salary is excluded from the statutory oldage insurance scheme, even where they affect considerably more women than men, since the national legislature was reasonably entitled to consider that the legislation in question was necessary in order to achieve a social policy aim unrelated to any discrimination on grounds of sex.'
Det forste præjudicielle spørgsmål
He proposed that the Court answer as follows:
Den nationale ret ønsker med dette spørgsmål først og fremmest en afgørelse af, om direktivets artikel 4, stk. 1, skal fortolkes således, at en national ordning, hvorefter beskæftigelse med en sædvanlig ugentlig arbejdstid på under femten timer og mod et vederlag, der ikke overstiger en syvendedel af referencemånedslønnen, ikke er omfattet af den lovbestemte alderspensionsordning, udgør forskelsbehandling på grundlag af køn, når langt liere kvinder end mænd berøres af denne ordning.
Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security should be interpreted as precluding a national provision which excludes employment normally involving less than 15 hours per week and remuneration of up to one-seventh of the monthly reference amount from the statutory oldage insurance scheme if that provision constitutes a disadvantage affecting a much larger number of women than of men, unless the provision in question is justified by objective criteria unrelated to any discrimination on grounds of sex.
Det står fast, at den i hovedsagen omtvistede nationale ordning ikke direkte er udtryk for forskelsbehandling, idet personer, der har ubetydelig beskæftigelse, ikke på grundlag af
A person who is not covered by Article 2 of Directive 79/7/EEC cannot rely on Article 4 thereof.
Det må fastslås, at den social- og beskæftigelsespolitiske målsætning, som den lyske regering har påberåbt sig, objektivt er uden sammenhæng med en hvilken som helst form for forskelsbehandling på grundlag af køn, og at den nationale lovgiver ved udøvelsen af sine beføjelser rimeligvis har kunnet gå ud fra, at den omtvistede lovgivning var nødvendig for gennemførelsen af nævnie formål.
Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7/EEC should be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of the correct implementation of the Directive, persons who are, by a majority, disadvantaged by the continuance of the discrimination are entitled to be treated in the same way, and have applied to them the same rules relating to social cover, as the other members of the working population.'
Generaladvokat P. Leger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens Plenum) den 31. maj 1995.
Case C-387/93 Giorgio Domingo Banchero Free movement of goods
Han foreslog følgende svar:
14 December 1995
»- Artikel 4, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF al 19. december 1978 om gradvis gennemførelse al princippet om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder med hensyn lil social sikring skal fortolkes således, at
Preliminary ruling (Articles 5, 30, 37, 85, 86, 90, 92 and 95 of the EEC Treaty) (Full Court)
En person, som ikke er omfattet af artikel 2 i direktiv 79/7/EØF, kan ikke påberåbe sig direktivers artikel
By order of 30 July 1993, received at the Court on 11 August 1993, the Pretura Circondariale, Genoa, referred for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Articles 5, 30, 37, 85, 86, 90, 92 and 95 of the EEC Treaty.
Artikel 4, stk. 1, i direktiv 79/7/EØF skal fortolkes således, at såfremt direktivet ikke anvendes korrekt, har personer, der som et flertal stilles ugunstigere ved den fortsatte forskelsbehandling, ret til at blive behandlet på samme måde og til at være omfattet af samme sociale dækningsordning som de øvrige medlemmer af den erhvervsaktive befolkning.«
Those questions arose in the course of criminal proceedings brought by the Italian authorities against Mr Banchero for the unlawful possession of manufactured tobacco products of foreign origin.
Præjudiciel »EØF-traktatens artikel 5, 30, 37, 85, 86, 90, 92 og 95« (Domstolens Plenum) artikel 5, 30, 37, 85, 86, 90, 92 og 95, samt artikel 2, artikel 4, stk. 1, og artikel 6, stk. 2, i Rådets direktiv 72/464/EØF om forbrugsbeskatning af forarbejdet tobak bortset fra omsæiningsafgili.
Before the national court, Mr Banchero contested the compatibility with Community law of the Italian monopoly in manufactured tobacco products and of a number of provisions which apply to manufactured tobacco products originating in other Member States.
Ved kendelse afsagt den 30. juli 1993, indgået til Domstolens Justitskontor den 11. august 1993, har Pretura circondariale di Genova forelagt Domstolen tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EØF-traktatens artikel 5, 30, 37, 85, 86, 90, 92 og 95.
By order of 14 March 1992, the national court stayed the proceedings and referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a number of questions on the interpretation of Articles 5,30, 37,85, 86, 90, 92 and 95 of the Treaty and of Articles 2, 4(1) and 6(2) of Council Directive 72/464/EEC on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under en straffesag mod G.D. Banchero, der står tiltalt for ulovlig besiddelse af udenlandsk forarbejdet tobak.
By order of 19 March 1993, the Court declared the reference for a preliminary ruling to be inadmissible on the ground that the national court had not set out the legal issues and facts of the case in sufficient detail to enable the Court to give a useful interpretation of Community law.
Domstolen har ved kendelse al 19. marts 1993 afvist anmodningen om en præjudiciel afgørelse fra behandling i realiteten med den begrundelse, at den ikke på grundlag af de alt for upræcise oplysninger i forelæggelseskendelsen om sagens faktiske og retlige omstændigheder var i stand til på hensigtsmæssig måde al fortolke fællesskabsretten.
It is clear not only from the wording of Article 37 but also from its position in the general scheme of the Treaty that the article is designed to ensure compliance with the fundamental rule of the free movement of goods throughout the common market, in particular by the abolition of quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect in trade between Member States, and thereby to maintain normal conditions of competition between the economies of Member States where a given product is subject, in one or other of those States, to a national monopoly of a commercial character.
Tiltalte har under straffesagen gjort gældende, ai del italienske statsmonopol for forarbejdet tobak saml visse italienske bestemmelser om indførsel af forarbejdet tobak Ira de øvrige medlemsstater er i sirid med fællesskabsretten.
As regards Article 95 of the Treaty, the national court is not asking the Court whether a system of penalties such as that at issue in this case is contrary to Article 95.
Spørgsmålet om hvorvidt spørgsmål kan admitteres
In the precise case of a distribution system such as that which the questions submitted in the present instance concern, the position could be different only if the provisions in question allowed the national authorities to intervene in the procurement choices of retailers.
Pretura di Genova har ved kendelse af 14. mans 1992 forelagt Domstolen en række præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen al traktatens
It is therefore unnecessary to reply to the questions submitted in so far as they concern the interpretation of Articles 85, 92 and 95 of the Treaty.
Hvad artikel 85 og 92 angår har den forelæggende rel ikke redegjort for de faktiske forhold i sagen.
It must be pointed out in this regard that the Italian legislation reserves the exclusive right of
om disse er omfattet af det pågældende monopol. Netop når der er tale om et sådant salgssystem som det i hovedsagen omhandlede, kan det kun forholde sig anderledes, såfremt situationen skulle være den, at de omhandlede bcsiemmelscr giver de nationale myndigheder mulighed for al gribe ind i detailhandlernes dispositioner vedrørende indkøb.
Any shortcomings which may affect the retail sale network do not adversely affect the sale of tobacco products from other Member States any more than the sale of tobacco products manufactured in Italy.
Det er altså ufornødent at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål, for så vidt som de vedrører fortolkningen af traktatens artikel 85, 92 og 95.
The Italian Government stated that procurement choices were a matter entirely for retailers to determine on the basis of market demands.
Del første spørgsmål
Article 30 of the Treaty
Den nationale ret ønsker en afgørelse af, om et forhandlingssystem for forarbejdede tobaksvarer som det, der er etableret ved den italienske lovgivning, er foreneligt med traktatens artikel 30 og 37.
The Italian monopoly in tobacco products has been reorganized in such a way that the AAMS has abandoned direct management of tobacco outlets and authorized retailers are guaranteed direct access to wholesalers.
Den italienske regering har i øvrigt som svar på et spørgsmål fra Domstolen oplyst, at detailhandlerne frii træffer d¡sporitioner vedrørende indkøb på grundlag al efterspørgslen på markedet.
The Court has consistently held that all trading rules enacted by Member States which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-Community trade are to be considered as measures having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.
Ifølge artikel 30 er kvantitative indførselsrestrikiioner såvel som alle foranstaltninger med tilsvarende virkning forbudt mellem medlemsstaterne.
The national court asks whether Articles 5, 90 and 86 of the Treaty preclude national legislation from reserving the retail sale of manufactured tobacco products to distributors authorized by the State.
Artikel 37, stk. 1, andet afsnit, der er en særlig bestemmelse vedrørende nationale handelsmonopoler, drejer sig om tilfælde, hvor en stats myndigheder - via et organ oprettet i dette øjemed eller via et siatskoncessioneret monopol - kan kontrollere eller lede samhandelen mellem medlemsstater eller udøve mærkbar indflydelse derpå.
However, the application to products from other Member States of national provisions restricting or prohibiting certain selling arrangements is not such as to hinder directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade between Member States, so long as those provisions apply to all relevant traders operating within the national territory and so long as they affect in the same manner, in law and in fact, the marketing of domestic products and of those from other Member States.
Del forhold, at nationale bestemmelser, som begrænser eller forbyder bestemie former for salg, bringes i anvendelse på varer fra andre medlemsstater, kan imidlertid ikke antages direkte eller indirekie, aktuell eller potentielt al hindre samhandelen mellem medlemsstaiernc, forudsat al sådanne nationale bestemmelser finder anvendelse på alle de berørte erhvervsdrivende, der udøver virksomhed i indlandet, og forudsat at bestemmelserne, såvel retligt som faktisk, påvirker afsætningen af indenlandsk l'rcmsiillcdc varer og varer Ira andre medlemsstater på samme måde.
That legislation does not relate to the characteristics of the products but concerns solely the arrangements for the retail sale of manufactured tobacco products, since it prohibits the sale of such tobacco products otherwise than through authorized outlets.
Traktatens artikel 37 kræver nemlig ikke, at de statslige handelsmonopoler afskaffes, men alene at de tilpasses, således at enhver form for forskelsbehandling af medlemsstaternes statsborgere med hensyn til forsynings- og afsætningsvilkår er udelukket.
Furthermore, the obligation on all traders to have their products distributed by authorized retailers applies without distinction as to the origin of the products in question and does not affect the marketing of goods from other Member States differently than that of domestic products.
Det fremgår såvel af artikel 37's ordlyd som af dens placering i traktatens system, at den har til formål at sikre, at det grundlæggende princip om de frie varebevægelser overholdes overalt inden for det fælles marked, især gennem afskaffelse af kvantitative restriktioner og foranstaltninger med tilsvarende virkning i samhandelen mellem medlemsstaterne, hvorved opretholdelsen af normale konkurrencevilkår mellem medlemsstaterne sikres i de tilfælde, hvor et bestemt produkt er underkastet et statsligt handelsmonopol i én eller flere af medlemsstaterne.
Article 1 of Law No 724 of 10 December 1975, which reorganized the Italian tobacco monopoly, allows manufactured tobacco products from other Member States of the Community, which represent a large part of the market, to be brought into wholesale distribution depots other than those of the AAMS. That provision therefore allows manufacturers of these tobacco products to set up their own wholesale depots and thus directly ensure the marketing of their products at retail outlets.
Endvidere bemærkes, at artikel 37 ikke gælder for nationale retsforskrifter, som ikke vedrører et offentligt monopols særlige funktion - nemlig udøvelse af eneret men generelt omfatter fremstilling ogafsætning af varer uden hensyn til,
The activity of the AAMS at the stage of retail sale, which consists essentially in authorizing the opening of tobacco outlets and in controlling their number and distribution throughout Italy,
Lovgivningen vedrører ikke varernes egenskaber, men udelukkende reglerne for salg en detail af forarbejdede tobaksvarer, idet salg al sådanne varer gennem andre end godkendte udsalg er forbudt.
It does not appear that authorizations to operate outlets are limited to the extent of jeopardizing a satisfactory supply of domestic and imported tobacco products to consumers. The Italian Government stated that the legislation in
Det bemærkes først, at AAMS ikke, som formuleringen af den nationale rets spørgsmål kunne give indtryk af, har eneret til forhandling af alle forarbejdede tobaksvarer, uanset hvorfra disse hidrører.
The national court also asks whether Article 30 of the Treaty precludes legislation providing for criminal sanctions such as that under which Mr Banchero is being charged.
Endvidere gælder forpligtelsen for samtlige erhvervsdrivende til at lade forhandling af deres varer ske gennem de godkendte detailhandlere uden forskel for sä vidt angår de pågældende varers oprindelse og påvirker ikke afsætningen af varer fra andre medlemsstater på en måde, der adskiller sig fra, hvad der gælder for indenlandske varer.
Added to the storage activities which the AAMS itself carries on in relation to all tobacco products, the combined effects of the exclusive rights which it retains in the sphere of production and wholesale trade in domestic tobacco products and of the State right of monopoly which the AAMS has at the retail level may indeed place that undertaking in a dominant position on the market for distribution of manufactured tobacco products.
Efter artikel 1 i nævnte lov nr. 724 af 10. december 1975, hvorved dei italienske tobaksmonopol er blevet reorganiseret, kan forarbejdede tobaksvarer fra de øvrige medlemsstater, som har en betydelig markedsandel, nemlig oplagres hos andre engroshandlende end AAMS.
While, in principle, criminal legislation and rules of criminal procedure are matters which remain within the Member States' area of competence, the Court has consistently held that Community law sets certain limits in relation to the control measures which it permits the Member States to maintain in connection with the free movement of goods and persons.
Producenterne af disse tobaksvarer kan således efter denne bestemmelse oprette deres egne engroslagre og dermed direkte stå for afsætningen af deres varer til detailhandlerne.
Administrative measures or penalties must not go beyond what is strictly necessary.
Det fremgår imidlertid ikke af sagen, at tilladelser til at drive tobaksudsalg meddeles i et så begrænset omfang, at udbuddet til forbrugerne af indenlandske eller indførte tobaksvarer bliver utilstrækkelige.
Nevertheless, the mere creation of a dominant position by the granting of an exclusive right within the meaning of Article 90(1) is not as such incompatible with Article 86 of the Treaty.
Den italienske regering har som svar på et spørgsmål fra Domstolen oplyst, at förmålet med den omtvistede lovgivning er at sikre den bedsi mulige geografiske fordeling al detailhandlerne, navnlig ud fra hensynet til den fysiske planlægning og ønskei om at placere udsalgene dér, hvor kundegrundlaget er størst.
A Member State will contravene the prohibitions contained in those two provisions only if, in merely exercising the exclusive right granted to it, the undertaking in question cannot avoid abusing its dominant position .
AAMS' virksomhed på detailforhandlingsområdei, der først og fremmest består i at meddele tilladelse til åbning af tobaksudsalg og kontrollere disses antal og fordeling på det italienske territorium, må endvidere forstås som udøvelse af offentlig myndighed og ikke som en egentlig erhvervsøkonomisk virksomhed.
In the present case, Mr Banchero does not stand charged with illegal importation of manufactured tobacco products but with possession of tobacco products on which excise duty, which is in fact in accordance with Community law, has not been paid.
Det må under alle omstændigheder bemærkes, at uhensigtsmæssige forhold, der vil kunne berøre dctailforhandlingsnettel ikke i højere grad er til skade for salgel af tobaksvarer fra andre medlemsstater, end for salgel af tobaksvarer, der er produceret i indlandet.
Moreover, the system of wholesale distribution of tobacco products put in place by that legislation, in so far as it allows only the AAMS to issue authorizations to operate outlets, results in a situation which prejudices consumers, within the meaning of heading (b) of the second paragraph of Article 86 of the Treaty.
Del bemærkes, at der er skel en reorganisering af del italienske tobaksmonopol, hvorved AAMS har opgivet direkte at administrere tobaksudsalgene, og de godkendte detailhandlere har fået sikkerhed for at kunne henvende sig direkte til grossisterne.
So far as retailers are concerned, these traders do not themselves have any exclusive or special distribution right at their place of establishment. They cannot therefore be regarded as undertakings having the kind of rights referred to in Article 90(1) of the Treaty.
Det kan dog gøres gældende, at de enerettigheder, AAMS fortsat har på områdei for produktion og forhandling en gros af indenlandske tobaksvarer, og den offentligretlige kompetence, AAMS udøver i detailleddet, i tilslutning til AAMS' rent faktiske drift af lagre for alle typer tobaksvarer, kan sætte virksomheden i stand lil at udøve en dominerende stilling på markedet for salg af forarbejdede tobaksvarer.
The penalties facing Mr Banchero do not hinder in any way the importation of tobacco products from other Member States, but merely tend to dissuade consumers from obtaining supplies of tobacco products, on which duties that are in accord with Community law have not been paid, through unauthorized traders who are themselves acting in breach of the Italian legislation applicable to the distribution of manufactured tobacco products.
Del fremgår desuden ikke al sagen, al del system lör forhandling en deiail al tobaksvarer, som er indført ved denne lovgivning, lör så vidt som del er forbeholdt AAMS al meddele tilladelser til
Article 37 of the EEC Treaty has no relevance with regard to national legislation, such as that in force in Italy, which reserves the retail sale of manufactured tobacco products to distributors authorized by the State, provided that the State does not intervene in the procurement choices of retailers.
Hvad detailhandlerne angår bemærkes, at disse ikke selv har enerettigheder eller særrettigheder vedrørende forhandling dér, hvor de har deres forretningssted. Tobaksudsalgene kan således ikke anses for virksomheder, der råder over rettigheder som omhandlet i traktatens artikel 90, stk. 1.
National legislation, such as that in force in Italy, which reserves the retail sale of manufactured tobacco products, irrespective of their origin, to authorized distributors but does not thereby bar access to the national market for products from other Member States or does not impede such access more than it impedes access for domestic products within the distribution network, does not f all within the scope of Article 30 of the Treaty.
Så meget desto mindre kan det lægges til grund, at der ved den italienske lovgivning er etableret en række sideordnede, territorialt begrænsede monopoler til fordel for de godkendte detailhandlere, hvorigennem der på det nationale område er skabt en dominerende stilling i traktatens artikel 86's forsiand.
Articles 5, 90 and 86 of the EEC Treaty do not preclude national legislation, such as that in force in Italy, from reserving the retail sale of manufactured tobacco products to distributors who have been authorized by the State.