natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 16. januar 1997.
Where, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, the Turkish national can rely only on his status as a member of the family of a migrant worker within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 7 because he does not fulfil the conditions for claiming, in his own right, the rights provided for by Article 6(1), the practical effect of Article 7 requires that the unity of the family, in pursuit of which the person concerned entered the territory of the Member State concerned, should be evidenced for a specified period by actual cohabitation in a household with the worker.
»Artikel 7, stk 1, 1. led, i afgørelse nr. 1/80 af 19. september 1980 om udvikling af associeringen fra del associeringsråd, som blev oprettet ved aftalen om oprettelse af en associering mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Tyrkiet, undertegnet i Ankara den 12. september 1963 og godkendt på Fællesskabets vegne ved Rådets afgørelse 64/732/EØF af 23. december 1963, skal fortolkes således, at et familiemedlem til en tyrkisk statsborger ansat lovligt på arbejdsmarkedet i en medlemsstat kun har den i bestemmelsen fastsatte ret til at modtage tilbud om beskæftigelse, såfremt den pågældende har haft lovlig bopæl sammen med den pågældende arbejdstager i mindst 3 år.«
It follows that Decision No 1/80 does not in principle prevent the authorities of a Member State from making extension of the residence permit of a family member authorized to join a Turkish worker in that Member State in order to enable the family to be together subject to the condition that the person concerned actually lives with that worker for the period of three years prescribed by the first indent of the first paragraph of Article 7 of that decision.
Sag T-47/95 Terres Rouges Consultant SA m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
It thus follows from the meaning and purpose of that provision that the family member must in principle reside uninterruptedly during those three years with the Turkish worker.
»Fælles markedsordning — bananer — importordning — rammeaftale om bananer indgået som led i de multilaterale handelsforhandlinger i Uruguay-rundens regi — forordning (EF) nr.
That would be the case in particular if the distance between the worker's residence and the place of employment of the member of his family or a vocational training establishment attended by that person required him or her to live in separate accommodation.
De relevante retsforskrifter og sagens baggrund der fastsat overgangsforanstaltninger for anvendelsen af ordningen for import af bananer til Fællesskabet, indtil der fastsættes endelige foranstaltninger.
However, that interpretation does not mean that the person concerned may not be absent from the family residence for a reasonable period and for legitimate reasons, for example in order to take holidays or visit his family in his country of origin.
Ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 af 13. februar 1993 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer (herefter »forordning nr. 404/93«), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 3290/94 af 22. december 1994 om de tilpasninger og overgangsforanstaltninger, der er nødvendige i landbrugssektoren for gennemførelsen af de aftaler, som er indgået under de multilaterale handelsforhandlinger i Uruguay-rundens regi, er der indført en fælles markedsordning for bananer.
enter their territory and reside there until he or she becomes entitled to respond to any offer of employment, the fact nevertheless remains that the rights conferred by the first paragraph of Article 7 on family members of a Turkish worker are granted by that provision to the persons concerned regardless of the issue by the authorities of the host Member State of a specific administrative document, such as a residence permit
Sagsøgerne er tre selskaber, som varetager indførsel og forhandling af 70% af Côte d'Ivoires bananproduktion.
The same must apply, a fortiori, to a period of less than six months spent by the person concerned in his country of origin for reasons beyond his control.
Ved stævning indleveret til Retten den 20. februar 1995 har sagsøgerne anlagt sag med påstand om annihilation af forordning nr. 3224/94.
In those circumstances, the period during which the person concerned was not in possession of a residence permit is not such as to affect the running of time for the purposes of the threeyear period laid down in the first indent of the first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80.
Efter at Rådet havde udstedt forordning nr. 404/93, anmodede en række latinamerikanske bananproducerende lande, nemlig Columbia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua og Venezuela, i henhold til den almindelige overenskomst om told og udenrigshandel (herefter »GATT«) om, at der blev oprettet et panel.
As regards the limitation of the period of validity of the residence permit held by the Turkish worker's family member in the host Member State, it must be observed that, whilst the Member States retain the power to lay down the conditions under which that family member may
Kommissionen har, støttet af Kongeriget Spanien, Den Franske Republik og Rådet, gjort gældende, at annullationssøgsmålet må afvises, fordi sagsøgerne ikke er umiddelbart og individuelt berørt af forordning nr. 3224/94 i EF-traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4's forstand.
The first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Economic Community and Turkey, does not in principle preclude the competent authorities of a Member State from requiring that the family members of a Turkish worker, referred to by that provision, tive with him for the period of three years prescribed by the first indent ofthat article in order to be entitled to reside in that Member State.
Kriteriet for, om der foreligger en forordning eller en beslutning, er, om den omhandlede retsakt er almengyldig eller ej.
The first indent of the first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 is to be interpreted as meaning that the family member concerned is in principle required to reside uninterruptedly f or three years in the host Member State.
Det afgørende er derfor den anfægtede retsakts beskaffenhed og navnlig de retsvirkninger, den skal have eller faktisk har.
However, account must be taken, for the purpose of calculating the threeyear period of legal residence within the meaning of that provision, of an involuntary stay of less than six months by the person concerned in his country of origin.
Som led i denne dekonsolidering indledte Kommissionen forhandlinger, som i løbet af marts 1994 førte til en rammeaftale om bananer (herefter »rammeaftalen«) med de berørte latinamerikanske lande, med undtagelse af Guatemala.
The same applies to the period during which the person concerned was not in possession of a valid residence permit, where the competent authorities of the host Member State did not claim on that ground that the person concerned was not legally resident within national territory, but on the contrary issued a new residence permit to him.'
Den er affattet i generelle og abstrakte vendinger og gælder i alle medlemsstaterne uden hensyn til de individuelle importørers situation.
Advocate General M.B. Elmer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 16 January 1997.
indførte importordning for bananer for at tilpasse den til de ændringer, der er indført ved den rammeaftale, som er indgået med de berørte latinamerikanske lande.
Case T-47/95 Terres Rouges Consultant SA and Others ν Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
Med hensyn til spørgsmålet, om sagsøgerne er individuelt berørt af den anfægtede forordning, bemærkes, at det ifølge fast retspraksis ikke kan udelukkes, at selv en generel retsakt, som er almengyldig for de pågældende virksomheder, under visse omstændigheder kan berøre nogle af dem individuelt.
(Common organization of the markets — Bananas — Import arrangements — Framework Agreement on Bananas concluded as part of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations — Regulation (EC) No 3224/94 — Community transitional measures for the implementation of the Framework Agreement — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility) (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition)
Sagsøgernes retsstilling bliver ikke påvirket på grund af en faktisk situation, som karakteriserer dem i forhold til andre erhvervsdrivende, der befinder sig i samme situation.
Legislative and factual background to in its schedule of concessions lodged with GATT and to enter into negotiations with the parties primarily concerned.
Det følger heraf, at forordning nr. 3224/94 ikke berører sagsøgerne individuelt.
The Commission commenced negotiations relating to that unbinding, which in March 1994 led to a framework agreement on bananas ('the Framework Agreement') with the Latin American countries concerned, other than Guatemala.
Muligheden for med større eller mindre bestemthed at angive antallet eller endog identiteten af de fysiske eller juridiske personer, på hvem en foranstaltning finder anvendelse, er dog på ingen måde ensbetydende med, at disse personer skal anses for individuelt berørt af denne foranstaltning.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas ('Regulation No 404/93'), as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 of 22 December 1994 on the adjustments and transitional arrangements required in the agriculture sector in order to implement the agreements concluded during the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations, established a common organization of the market in bananas.
Skønt det ikke er strengt nødvendigt at gå ind på spørgsmålet, om sagsøgerne er umiddelbart berørt af denne forordning, bør det tilføjes, at denne kun indirekte påvirker sagsøgernes retsstilling. Forordning nr. 404/93 pålægger hver enkelt importør pligt til at erhverve en importlicens til import af tredjelandsbananer.
Following adoption by the Council of Regulation No 404/93, a number of Latin American bananaproducing countries, namely Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Venezuela, asked for a panel to be set up under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ('GATT).
Disse bestemmelser finder således anvendelse på objektivt afgrænsede forhold og har retsvirkninger over for generelt og abstrakt afgrænsede personkredse. Det følger af det anførte, at den anfægtede retsakt kun berører sagsøgerne i deres objektive egenskab af erhvervsdrivende inden for sektoren for handel med bananer med oprindelse i tredjelande på samme måde som enhver anden erhvervsdrivende, der befinder sig i samme situation (Domstolens kendelse af 21.6.1993, sag C-276/93, Chiquita Banana m.fl. mod Rådet).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 3224/94 of 21 December 1994 laying down transitional measures for the implementation of the Framework Agreement on Bananas concluded as part of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations ('Regulation No 3224/94' or the 'contested regulation') laid down transitional measures applying the arrangements for importing bananas into the Community pending adoption of definitive measures.
Under disse omstændigheder kan kun medlemsstaternes beslutninger om at bevilge eller nægte disse licenser berøre sagsøgerne umiddelbart.
The panel found that some aspects of the arrangements laid down by Regulation No 404/93 were incompatible with GATT.
Det følger i det hele af det anførte, at sagen må afvises.
Regulation No 3224/94 was adopted, in particular, on the basis of Article 20 of Regulation No 404/93, which authorizes the Commission to adopt detailed rules for implementing Title IV (Trade with third countries).
Ifølge ordlyden af forordning nr. 404/93 har importørerne imidlertid alle ret til at indføre bananer hidrørende fra Côte d'Ivoire. Forordning nr. 3224/94 berører altså alle de importører, som ønsker at indføre bananer fra Côte d'Ivoire, og
In order to find a satisfactory permanent solution to the dispute between the Latin American countries and the Community, the latter gave notice in October 1993 of its intention to 'unbind', the customs duty on bananas referred
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
circumstances, even a legislative measure applying to the traders concerned in general may concern some of them individually.
2) Sagsøgerne betaler in solidum de omkostninger, der er afholdt af Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
As the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance have consistently held, the fourth paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty gives individuals the right to challenge any decision which, although in the form of a regulation, is of direct and individual concern to them.
Sag T-390/94 Aloys Schröder, Jan et Karl-Julius Thamann / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
The test for distinguishing between a regulation and a decision is whether or not the measure in question has general application.
»Fællesskabets ansvar uden for kontrakt — foranstaltninger mod klassisk svinepest i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland· (Femte Afdeling)
It is drafted in general and abstract terms and is applicable in all the Member States, without any regard being had to the situation of individual producers.
Sag T-66/95 Hedwig Kuchlenz-Winter / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Personalesag
It follows that the contested regulation applies to situations which have been determined objectively and has legal effects with respect to a category of persons viewed in a general and abstract manner.
Sag T-80/96 Ana Maria Fernandes Leite Mateus / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Personalesag
Accordingly, Regulation No 3224/94 is not of individual concern to the applicants.
»Tjenestemænd —generel udvælgelsesprøve — manglende adgang til prøverne — krav om faglig erfaring· (Første Afdeling)
In those circumstances, only the decisions of the Member States granting or refusing such licences are capable of concerning the applicants directly.
Faktiske omstændigheder og retlig baggrund
The applicants are ordered to bear jointly and severally the costs incurred by the defendant;
malkekvægbesætninger. Ved forordningen blev producenterne tilbudt en præmie for at påtage sig at undlade at markedsføre mælk i en periode på fem år eller at omstille besætningerne.
Case T­390/94 Aloys Schroder, Jan and Karl­Julius Thamann ν Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
Tildelingen af en særlig referencemængde var undergivet flere betingelser.
(Non-contractual liability of the Community Republic of Germany) (Fifth Chamber)
Visse af disse betingelser blev kendt ugyldige af Domstolen ved domme af 11. december 1990 i sagerne Spagl (sag C-189/89) og Pastätter (sag C-217/89).
Legal background of Niedersachsen with 60 cases, of which 18 occurred in the period from 25 May to 16 June 1993 alone.
Ved den ny artikel 5c i forordningen blev der indført en »tillægsafgift« på de mængder mælk, som producenterne leverer og som overstiger en »referencemængde«.
Relying on Directive 90/425, the Commission adopted Decision 93/364/EEC of 18 June 1993 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany.
På baggrund af disse domme udstedte Rådet forordning (EØF) nr. 1639/91 af 13. juni 1991 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84 om almindelige regler for anvendelsen af den i artikel 5c i forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68 omhandlede afgift for mælk og mejeriprodukter (herefter »forordning nr. 1639/91«), hvorved de berørte producenter fik tildelt en særlig referencemængde. Disse producenter kaldes »SLOM li-producenter«.
Since, in the meantime, fresh outbreak sites were confirmed in Germany, Commission Decision 93/497/EEC of 15 September 1993 amending Decision 93/364 enlarged the part of the territory concerned by the bans on the export of pigs.
Ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84 af 31. marts 1984 om almindelige regler for anvendelsen af den i forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68 omhandlede afgift på mælk og mejeriprodukter (herefter »forordning nr. 857/84«) blev referencemængden for hver enkelt producent fastsat på grundlag af den produktion, der var leveret i et referenceår, nemlig kalenderåret 1981, idet medlemsstaterne dog kunne vælge kalenderåret 1982 eller kalenderåret 1983.
With a view to the completion of the internal market and in order to guarantee free movement of animals, the Community adopted a whole series of measures, including Council Directive 90/425 EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra­Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (hereinafter 'Directive 90/425'), which provides in particular that veterinary checks are essentially to be carried out at the place of dispatch and that they may take place in the Member State of destination only in the form of spot checks and, secondly, that a Member State should immediately adopt the provisions provided for by Community law in the event of the outbreak of certain diseases on its territory, such as classical swine fever.
Forordningen blev suppleret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1371/84 af 16. maj 1984 om gennemførelsesbestemmelserne for den tillægsafgift, der er omhandlet i artikel 5c i forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68 (herefter »forordning nr. 1371/84«).
When a first case of classical swine fever had been diagnosed in Belgium in pigs imported from Germany, Belgium, by Ministerial Decree of 14 October 1993, prohibited the importation of pigs from Germany and the Commission, by Decision 93/539/EEC of 20 October 1993 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany and repealing Decision 93/364 (hereinafter 'Decision 93/539") extended the prohibitions on the exportation of pigs to the entire territory of Germany.
Sagsøgernes ikke-markedsførings- eller omstillingsforpligtelser dækkede disse referenceår. Da de ikke havde produceret mælk i de pågældende år, kunne de ikke få tildelt en referencemængde og således heller ikke markedsføre mælk, der var fritaget for tillægsafgiften.
Article 10 of Directive 90/425 lays down the respective obligations of the Member States of dispatch, of the Member States of destination and of the Commission with regard to the prevention and combating of any disease likely to constitute a serious hazard to animals or to human health.
Ved dom af 19. maj 1992 i de forenede sager C104/89 og C-37/90, Mulder m.fl. mod Rådet og Kommissionen (herefter »Mulder II-dommen«), fastslog Domstolen, at Fællesskabet er ansvarligt for de pågældende tab.
Commission Decision 93/553/EEC of 29 October 1993 amending Decision 93/539 prolonged until 4 November 1993 the export prohibitions initially applicable until 29 October 1993.
Det fremgår af dommen, at enhver producent, der har været forhindret i at markedsføre mælk, alene fordi han har påtaget sig en ikke-markedsførings- eller omstillingsforpligtelse, i princippet har krav på erstatning for de herved lidte tab.
Council Directive 80/217/EEC of 22 January 1980 introducing Community measures for the control of classical swine fever (hereinafter 'Directive 80/217') introduces Community measures for the control of classical swine fever.
Ved domme af 28. april 1988 i sagerne Mulder (sag 120/86) og Von Deetzen (sag 170/86) fastslog Domstolen, at forordning nr. 857/84, som suppleret ved forordning nr. 1371/84, er ugyldig som følge af en tilsidesættelse af princippet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning.
The Commission then adopted, still on the basis of Article 10(4) of Directive 90/425, Decision 93/566/EC of 4 November 1993 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany and replacing Decision 93/539 (hereinafter 'Decision 93/566'). Under that decision, Germany was not to send live pigs
På baggrund af det store antal berørte producenter og i betragtning af vanskelighederne ved at forhandle individuelle løsninger offentliggjorde Rådet og Kommissionen den 5. august 1992 meddelelse 92/C 198/04 (herefter
In 1993, 100 cases of classical swine fever were reported in Germany, as against 13 in 1992 and six in 1991. Those 100 cases were spread over seven Länder, the most affected being the Land
Forordning nr. 2187/93 giver således blot hjemmel til, at der gives de mælkeproducenter, der har lidt tab som følge af anvendelsen al forordning nr. 857/84, et tilbud om erstatning for den i henhold til artikel 8 fastsatte periode.
nor fresh pigmeat or pigmeat products coming from the districts referred to in Annex I not only to other Member States but also to other parts of its own territory (hereinafter 'bans on dispatch').
Såfremt en producent ikke accepterer tilbuddet, forbliver han i nøjagtig samme situation, som hvis den omhandlede forordning ikke var blevet udstedt, idet han bevarer retten til at anlægge et erstatningssøgsmål i medfør af traktatens artikel 178 og 215.
The question to be examined, therefore, is whether the contested decisions are legislative or administrative in nature and, in such a case, whether the Commission had a wide discretion for their adoption.
Producenterne havde mulighed for at anlægge en erstatningssag i medfør af traktatens artikel 178 og 215.
In order to determine the nature of the measures in question, the following considerations must be taken into account.
Da antallet af berørte producenter ifølge betragtningerne til forordning nr. 2187/93 udelukker, at der tages hensyn til den enkeltes individuelle situation, giver den anfægtede retsakt dem mulighed for at opnå den erstatning, de har ret til, uden at anlægge erstatningssøgsmål.
The applicants' holding has not been affected by classical swine fever but is located in the parts of the territory covered by the bans on dispatch imposed by the decisions which the Commission adopted between 4 November 1993 and 19 November 1994.
Datoen for afbrydelsen af forældelsen på fem år efter artikel 43 i Domstolens statut er datoen for kravets fremsættelse over for en af Fællesskabets institutioner eller datoen for registreringen af et søgsmål for Domstolen eller senest den 5. august 1992, dvs. datoen for offentliggørelsen af ovennævnte meddelelse. Erstatningsperioden begynder fem år forud for datoen for afbrydelsen af forældelsen og ophører på det tidspunkt, hvor producenten fik tildelt en særlig referencemængde i medfør af forordning nr. 764/89 og 1639/91.
First, the contested decisions produce with regard to the applicants effects which are those of a measure of general application, in the same way as a regulation prohibiting all pig producers and exporters established in certain parts of a Member State's territory from dispatching specific animals or products to other Member States or to other parts of that Member State's territory.
Ifølge forordning nr. 2187/93 indebærer en accept af tilbuddet et afkald på enhver form for yderligere krav mod fællesskabsinstitutionerne for det omtvistede tab.
The applicants maintain that the Commission's decisions are vitiated by illegality and that they have caused them damage which the Community must make good pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 215 of the EC Treaty.
Artikel 8 og 14 i forordning nr. 2187/93, som sagsøgernes annullationspåstand særligt er rettet mod, fastsætter blot den periode, for hvilken der tilbydes en erstatning, og konsekvenserne af en accept af tilbuddet.
Second, the contested decisions have been adopted in the field of common agricultural policy, as is clear both from their content and the reference made to Article 43 of the Treaty by Directive 90/425, on the basis of which they were adopted; in this field, the institutions normally have a broad discretion.
Kun retsakter, der har bindende retsvirkninger, som kan berøre sagsøgerens interesser gennem en væsentlig ændring af hans retsstilling, kan gøres til genstand for et annullationssøgsmål.
It is settled case-law that, in order for the Community to incur liability, a set of conditions must be met: the conduct alleged against the Community institution must be illegal, there must be actual damage and there must be a causal link between the unlawful conduct and the damage claimed.