natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Protokollens artikel 12 vedrører ikke vidneafhøring af tjenestemænd og Øvrige ansatte ved Fællesskaberne eller ophævelsen af den for dem gældende immunitet.
Article 12 of the Protocol did not concern the hearing of officials and other agents of the Community as witnesses and the lifting in that connexion of the immunities enjoyed by those persons.
Dette spørgsmål behandles i artikel 19 i vedtægten for tjenestemænd i De Europæiske Fællesskaber, som dog intet bestemmer om Domstolens godkendelse.
That question was governed by Article 19 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities, which did not provide for authorization by the Court.
Domstolen henviste til, at den i dommen i sag 294/83 (Miljøpartiet "Les Verts" mod Europa-Parlamentet) havde fastslået, at Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fælles skab er et retsfællesskab, idet både dets medlemsstater og dets institutioner er undergivet kontrol med, at deres retsakter er forenelige med Fællesskabets forfatning, som er Traktaten.
On this point the Court recalled that in its judgment in Case 294/83 (Les Verts ν European Parliament), it had emphasized the principle that the European Economic Community was a Community based on the rule of law, inasmuch as neither Its Member States nor its institutions could avoid a review of the question whether the measures adopted by them were in conformity with the basic constitutional charter, the Treaty.
I dette retsfællesskab er medlemsstaterne og Fællesskabets institutioner gensidigt forpligtet til loyalt samarbejde, jfr. EØF-Traktatens artikel 5.
In that Community based on the rule of law, the relationship between the Member States and the Community institutions was governed, pursuant to Article 5 of the EEC Treaty, by the principle of reasonable cooperation.
Domstolen tilføjede, at de privilegier og immuniteter, som i henhold til protokollen indrømmes De Europæiske Fællesskaber, vurderet på grundlag af dette princip kun har en funktionel karakter, idet de har til formål at undgå, at der opstilles hindringer for Fællesskabernes funktion og uafhængighed.
When analysed in the light of that principle, the privileges and immunities which the Protocol granted to the European Communities had a purely functional character, inasmuch as they were intended to avoid any hindrance to the functioning and independence of the Communities.
Den af rechtercommissaris, Groningen, fremsatte anmodning antages til påkendelse.
The request by the Rechter-commissari s, Groningen, is declared admissible.
Kommissionen tilstiller Domstolen en liste over de rapporter, der i perioden 1983-1987 er udarbejdet af de tjenestemænd ved Kommissionen, der i Nederlandene har udført kontrol på havfiskeriområdet, og for så vidt angår de rapporter, som nægtes udleveret til rechtercommissaris, Groningen, meddeler Kommissionen Domstolen de tvingende grunde til - under hensyntagen til nødvendigheden af at undgå hindringer for Fællesskabernes funktion og uafhængighed - at nægte at fremlægge de pågældende rapporter.
The Commission is ordered to forward to the Court a list of the reports drawn up between 1983 and 1987 by Commission officials who carried out inspections in the Netherlands with regard to sea fisheries and to submit to the Court in respect of the reports which the Commission refuses to produce to the Rechtercommissaris, Groningen, a statement of the imperative reasons relating to the need to avoid any hindrance to the functioning and independence of the Communities justifying that refusal.
De rapporter, for hvilke Kommissionen ikke anfører ovennævnte tvingende grunde, fremlægges omgående for rechtercommissaris, Groningen.
The reports in respect of which the Commission does not rely on the said imperative reasons are to be transmitted forthwith to the Rechter-commissari s, Groningen.
Domstolen træffer senere afgørelse om anmodningen om fremlæggelse af de rapporter, for hvilke Kommissionen har anført ovennævnte tvingende grunde.
The Court will rule at a later date on the application for production of the reports in respect of which the Commission relies on the said imperative reasons.
Kommissionen giver sine tjenestemænd tilladelse til at afgive vidneforklaring for rechtercommissaris, Groningen, vedrørende de af dem konstaterede forhold under den kontrol, de i perioden 1983-1987 har udført i Nederlandene på havfiskeriområdet, og for så vidt angår de tjenestemænd, der af Kommissionen nægtes tilladelse hertil, oplyser denne Domstolen om de tvingende grunde til - under hensyntagen til nødvendigheden af at varetage Fællesskabernes interesser - at nægte denne tilladelse.
The Commission is ordered to authorize its officials to be examined as witnesses before the Rechter-commissari s, Groningen, with regard to their findings during the inspections carried out in the Netherlands between 1983 and 1987 in the sea fisheries sector and to submit to the Court in respect of the officials for whom such authorization is refused a statement of the imperative reasons relating to the need to safeguard the interests of the Communities that justify refusal of authorization.
Domstolen træffer senere afgørelse om anmodningen, for så vidt angår de tjenestemænd, som Kommissionen under påberåbelse af ovennævnte tvingende grunde nægter tilladelse til at afgive vidneforklaring.
The Court will rule at a later date on the application concerning the officials whom the Commission refuses to authorize to be examined as witnesses in reliance on the said imperative reasons.
Afgørelsen om sagens omkostninger udsættes."
Costs are reserved."
10.7.1990 Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 21. april 1989, hvori det bestemmes, at sagsøgeren er forpligtet til at tilbagebetale forskud fra Den Europæiske Socialfond, og at det af sagsøgeren gennemførte projekt ikke kan komme i betragtning - erstatningskrav. krav.
FUNOC V Commission - 10 July 1990 Application for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 21 April 1989 finding that the applicant was liable to reimburse sums advanced by the European Social Fund and that the project it had carried out did not qualify for assistance - Claim for damages Advocate-General: G. Tesauro Language of the case: French
Traktatbrud - manglende gennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 80/987/EØF af 20. oktober 1980 om beskyttelse af arbejdstagere i tilfælde af arbejdsgiverens insolvens. Generaladvokat : Lenz.
Commission v Greece - 11 July 1990 Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Failure to comply with Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer Advocate-General: CO.
12.7.1990 Annullation af dokumentet "Interne tjenesteinstrukser vedrørende visse administrative og tekniske regler, der skal følges af de personer, der af Kommissionen bemyndiges til at foretage prøveudtagning og analyse af de udtagne produkter som led i forvaltningen af og kontrollen med Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond", offentliggjort i EFT C 264 af 11. oktober 1988 under ref.nr. 88/C 264/03. Generaladvokat : Tesauro. Processprog : fransk.
France v Commission - 12 July 1990 Application for the annulment of the document entitled "Internal Instructions concerning certain administrative and technical procedures to be followed by officials given powers by the Commission concerning sampling and analysis of products for the purposes of the management and control of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund" published in the Official Journal No.
12.7.1990 Annullation af beslutning C(89) 19 end. om statsstøtte til italienske producenter af koncentreret, rektificeret most. Generaladvokat : Lenz. Processprog : italiensk.
Application for the annulment of Decision No. C (89) 19 def. concerning State aid for Italian producers of rectified concentrated must Advocate-General: CO.
B. For Retten i Ferste Instans
B. Before the Court of First Instance
Sag C-47/88 Komissionen aod Danmark
Case C-47/88
11.7.1990 Erstatningssøgsmål - Fællesskabets ansvar uden for kontrakt for skadelige følger af gennemførelsen af Rådets direktiv 87/343/EØF af 22. juni 1987 om ændring, for så vidt angår kreditforsikring og kautionsforsikring, af direktiv 73/329/EØF om samordning af de administrativt eller ved lov fastsatte bestemmelser om adgang til og udøvelse af direkte forsikringsvirksomhed bortset fra livsforsikring. sikring.
Les Assurances du Crédit SA and Others ν Council and Commission - 11 July 1990 Claim for compensation - Non-contractual liability of the Community in respect of damage arising out of the implementation of Council Directive 87/343/EEC of 22 June 1987 amending, as regards credit insurance and suretyship insurance, First Directive 73/239/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct Insurance other than Ufe insurance Advocate-General: G. Tesauro Language of the case: English
Processprog : engelsk.
Case C-303/88
Sag T-63/89 Tjenestemandssag.
Case T-63/89
Sag T-134/89 Tjenestemandssag.
Case T-134/89
Sag T-139/89 Tjenestemandssag.
Case T-139/89
Sag T-132/89 Tjenestemandssag.
Case T-132/89
V - NYE SAGER
V - NEW CASES
Sag C-153/90 Pay Harro Michelsen mod Rådet
Case C-153/90
Processprog : tysk.
Case C-154/90
Sag C-154/90 H. Hartz mod Rådet (Se sag C-153/90).
H. Hartz ν Council (See Case C-127/90)
Traktatbrud - tilsidesættelse af Rådets direktiv 79/409/EØF af 2. april 1979 om beskyttelse af vilde fugle - direktivet ikke gennemført fuldt ud i national ret.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Infringement of Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds - National legislation not in compliance with the directive Language of the case: English
Processprog : engelsk.
Case C-156/90
Sag C-156/90 C. Schulte-Strat mann mod Rådet og Kommissionen (Se sag C-153/90).
C Schulte-Stratmann ν Council and Commission (See Case C-127/90) case C-157/90
Sag C-157/90 Infortec - Projectos e Consultadoria mod Kommissionen Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 9. marts 1990 om nedsættelse af det tidligere godkendte tilskud fra Den Europaiske Socialfond. Processprog : portugisisk.
Infortec - Projectos e Consultadoria ν Commission Application for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 9 March 1990 reducing the contribution of the European Social Fund to a previously approved training programme Language of the case: Portuguese
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra High Court, Dublin.
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Limited ν S. Grogan and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling) High Court, Dublin
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikler 59 og 60 - udtrykket "tjenesteydelse" i artikel 60 - faktisk udførelse af abort eller lægelig afbrydelse af svangerskab - national lovgivning der for byder abort - reklame for klinikker i andre medlemsstater, hvor svangerskabsafbrydelse foretages.
Interpretation of Articles 59 and 60 of the EEC Treaty -Concept of "services" referred to in Article 60 - Organized activity or process of carrying out an abortion or the medical termination of pregnancy - National legislation prohibiting abortion - Publicity for clinics located in other Member States where abortions are performed Language of the case: English
Udgivet af Informationstjenesten ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol L-2925 Luxembourg.
Published by the Information Service of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, L-2925 Luxembourg.
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROP/tlSKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS *)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Week of 17 to 21 September 1990
Vismans Nederland mod Inspecteur der Invoerrecthen en Accijnzen Frie varebevagelser Sag C-5/89 Kommissionen mod Tyskland Statsstøtte Sag C-192/89 S.Z. Sevince mod Staatssecretaris van Justitie Fri bevagelighed for personer Sag C-203/89
Case C­192/89 S.Z. Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie Free movement of persons
* DENNE PUBLIKATION UDARBEJDES AF DOMSTOLENS INFORMATIONSTJENESTE MED HENBLIK PÄ EN HURTIG ORIENTERING OM ARBEJDET VED DOMSTOLEN.
THIS BULLETIN IS PREPARED BY THE INFORMATION SERVICE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE IN ORDER TO SUPPLY READERS WITH RAPID INFORMATION ON THE WORK OF THE INSTITUTION.
DOMSTOLENS DOMME OG DE FOR DOMSTOLEN FREMSATTE FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE OFFENTLIGGØRES SENERE I "DOMSSAMLINGEN".
HOWEVER, ONLY THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS PUBLISHED LATER IN THE REPORTS OF CASES BEFORE THE COURT IS AUTHENTIC.
Ved kendelse af 26. april 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 18. juli s.a., havde Finanzgericht München forelagt tre préjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Den Fælles Toldtarifs positioner 70.13, 99.01 og 99.03.
By an order of 26 April 1989, which was received at the Court on 18 July 1989, the Finanzgericht München sought a preliminary ruling from the Court on three questions concerning Common Customs Tariff headings 70.13, 99.01 and 99.03.
Spørgsmålene var blevet rejst under en sag mellem de nævnte parter vedrørende tariferingen af brevpressere, som Farfalla havde indført fra USA.
Those questions arose in the context of a dispute between the parties in the main proceedings as to the tariff classification of paperweights Imported by Farfalla from the United States.
De omhandlede brevpressere bestod af glaskugler med farvet motiv, som var fremstillet som rent håndarbejde af amerikanske kunstnere. Farfalla havde ansøgt om, at brevpresserne blev ekspederet til fri omstatning og havde anmeldt dem under Den Fælles Toldtarifs position 99.03 "originale skulpturer, uanset materialets art", som er fritaget for told.
Since the paperweights in question consisted of glass spheres decorated with coloured motifs and executed entirely by hand by American glassware artists, Farfalla, when applying for their release into free circulation, declared them as "original sculptures and statuary, in any material" within the meaning of heading 99.03 of the Common Customs Tariff, which provides for an exemption from customs duties.
Hauptzollamt München-West ekspederede derimod varerne som "dekorationsgenstande o.lign. af glas" under toldtariffens position 70.13, som er pålagt told.
The Hauptzollamt, however, classified those goods as "glassware for Indoor decoration or for similar uses" under tariff heading 70.13, which provides for a customs duty to be levied.
"Glaskugler, betegnet brevpressere, med ståflade og med på- eller indlagt to- eller tredimensionalt motiv, som i et begrænset antal er fremstillet som rent håndarbejde af anerkendte kunstnere, herunder signeret, skal i forbindelse med toldtariferingen betragtes som genstande, der har karakter af handelsvarer, og skal følgelig tariferes afhængig af deres grundmateriale."
"Glass spheres having a flat base, decorated with two­ or three­dimensional motifs and described as "paperweights", which are executed entirely by hand in limited series and signed by well­known glassware artists are to be regarded, for the purposes of tariff classification, as being works of a commercial character and, consequently, classified according to their constituent ma­terials."
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 26. juni
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 26 June 1990.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse: "Glaskugler, betegnet brevpressere, med ståflade og med på- eller indlagt to- eller tredimensionalt motiv, som i begrænset antal er fremstillet som rent håndarbejde af anerkendte kunstnere, skal ikke betragtes som skulpturer (position 99.03), medmindre der dels foreligger genstande, som specielt salges uden for det sædvanlige marked for tilsvarende genstande med samme anvendelse, dels foreligger en høj vardi, som ikke står i forhold til de materialer, de består af, hvorved deres tilsigtede anvendelse ikke synes at være den sædvanlige".
"Glass spheres having a flat base and described as paperweights, which are executed entirely by hand by well­known glassware artists in limited series and are decorated with two­ or three­dimensional motifs, are not to be regarded as original sculptures or statuary (tariff heading 99.03) unless they are bought and sold in special transactions outside the usual channels for comparable items in general use, unless their value is high and in any event unrelated to the inherent value of their component parts and unless they are, therefore, apparently not Intended to be put to normal use."
Sag C-265/89: Gebr. Visaians Nederland BV nod Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen 18.9.1990
Case C-265/89: Gebr.
Ved kendelse af 11. august 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 23. august s.a., stillede Tariefcommissie to préjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen og gyldigheden af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1388/85.
By a decision of 11 August 1989, which was received at the Court on 23 August 1989, the Tariefcommissie sought a preliminary ruling from the Court on two questions concerning the interpretation and the validity of Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 1388/85.
Disse spørgsmål var blevet rejst under en tvist mellem de ovennævnte parter vedrørende tariferingen af delvis afsukrede sukkerroesnitter, som Vismans havde importeret til Nederlandene.
Those questions arose in the context of a dispute between the parties in the main proceedings as to the tariff classification of partly desugared sliced sugar beet imported by Vismans into the Netherlands.
Disse snitter, som er rester efter sukkerudvinding, blev ved indførslen tariferet under Den Falles Toldtarifs position 23.03 Β I. Efter en rakke undersøgelser blev de pågældende snitters saccharoseindhold imidlertid vurderet til 12X.
The sliced beet, which forms the residue after sugar extraction, was classified on importation under subheading 23.03 B I of the Common Customs Tariff. However, following various analyses, the sucrose content of the sliced beet in question was found to be 12 %.
Da denne procentsats er højere end de 10%, der er fastsat i forordning nr. 1388/85, besluttede Inspecteur i henhold til forordningens artikel 1 at tarifere snitterne under position 12.04.
Since that was higher than the 10 % level laid down in Regulation No. 1388/85, the inspector decided to classify the sliced beet under tariff heading 12.04 in accordance with Article 1 of that regulation.
Følgelig blev sagsøgeren afkrævet et vist beløb 1 landbrugsafgift.
The appellant was consequently charged an aqrlculturai levy of a certain amount.
Domstolen kendte for ret:
(he Court ruled as follows:
12.04 A i Den Fælles Toldtarif er ugyldig."
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 10 July 1990.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 10. juli
Case C-5/89: Commission of the European Communities ν Federal Republic of Germany - 20 September 1990 (State aids - Undertaking producing semi-finished and finished aluminium products - Recovery) (Full Court)
Sag C-5/89: Kommissionen for De Europeiske Fællesskaber mod Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland
The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs."
20.9.1990 "Statsstøtte - virksomhed, der fremstiller hel- og halvfabrikata af aluminium - tilbagesøgning" (plenum)
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 8 May 1990.
Ved kendelse af 1. juni 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 8. juni s.a., havde Nederlandenes Raad van State forelagt tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af en rakke bestemmelser 1 afgørelserne nr. 2/76 og nr. 1/80 fra Associeringsrådet oprettet i henhold til associeringsaftalen mellem EØF og Tyrkiet.
By a decision of 1 June 1989, which was received at the Court on 8 June 1989, the Raad van State of the Netherlands sought a preliminary ruling from the Court on three questions concerning the interpretation of certain provisions of Decisions No. 2/76 and 1/80 of the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey.
S.Z. Sevince, der er tyrkisk statsborger, fik i 1980 afslag pS en anmodning om forlængelse af den opholdstilladelse, han havde fået meddelt i 1979. Ved dom af 12. juni 1986 frifandt Raad van State Staatssecretaris van Justitie i den af Sevince anlagte sag, der havde opsattende virkning.
In 1980 Mr Sevince, a Turkish national, was refused an extension of the residence permit granted to him in 1979.
Inden afgørelsen i sagen, mens sagsanlægget endnu havde opsattende virkning, fik Sevince meddelt arbejdstilladelse, som gjaldt indtil Raad van State's afsigelse af den navnte dom.
While the effect of the decision was suspended pending the outcome of the appeal, Mr Sevince obtained a work certificate which remained valid until the Raad van State gave its judgment.
Under henvisning til, at han i en årrække havde udøvet lønnet beskæftigelse i Nederlandene, ansøgte Sevince 1 1987 om opholdstilladelse.
In 1987, claiming that he had been employed in the Netherlands for a certain number of years, Mr Sevince applied for a residence permit.
Til støtte for sin ansøgning henviste han til ovennævnte afgørelser nr. 2/76 og nr. 1/80, hvorefter tyrkiske arbejdstagere, der har haft lovlig beskaftigelse i fire og/eller fem år i en medlemsstat, har fri adgang til enhver form for lønnet arbejde efter eget valg.
In support of his application, he referred to Decisions No. 2/76 and 1/80, cited above, under which, after four and/or five years of legal employment in a Member State of the Community, a Turkish worker is to enjoy free access to any paid employment of his choice.
Ansøgningen blev stiltiende afslået af de nederlandske myndigheder.
That application was dismissed by implied rejec­tion by the Netherlands authorities.
Med de forelagte spørgsmål Ønskede den nationale ret navnlig at få afgjort, om fortolkningen af ovennævnte afgørelser nr. 2/76 og nr. 1/80 henhører under EØF-Traktatens artikel 177, om artiklerne 2, stk. 1, litra b), og 7 i afgørelse nr. 2/76 samt artiklerne 6, stk. 1, og 13 i afgørelse nr. 1/80 må anses for at vare umiddelbart anvendelige i EF-medlemsstaterne, og endelig om udtrykket "lovlig beskaftigelse" 1 ovennevnte bestemmelser omfatter en tyrkisk arbejdstager, der har fået tilladelse til at udføre arbejde i den periode, hvor han har opnået udsettelse med gennemførelse af en afgørelse, hvorved han nagtes opholdsret, og som er genstand for en af ham anlagt sag.
The Court considered that the Raad van State's questions sought, essentially, to ascertain whether the interpretation of Decisions No. 2/76 and 1/80 fell within the scope of Article 177 of the EEC Treaty; whether Articles 2 (1) (b) and 7 of Decision No. 2/76 and Articles 6 (1) and 13 of Decision No. 1/80 had direct effect 1n the territory of the Member States; and, finally, whether the term "legal employment" used in those provisions covered the situation of a Turkish worker authorized to engage in employment for such time as the effect of a decision refusing him a right of residence, against which he had lodged an appeal, was suspended.
Udtrykket "lovlig beskaftigelse" i artikel 2, stk. 1, litra b), i afgørelse nr. 2/76 og/eller i artikel 6, stk. 1, tredje led, i afgeYelse nr. 1/80 omfatter ikke en tyrkisk arbejdstager, der er blevet meddelt tilladelse til at udføre arbejde i den periode, hvor han har opnået udsatteise med gennemførelse af en afgørelse, hvorved han nægtes opholdsret, og som er genstand for en af ham anlagt sag, han har tabt.
The term "legal employment" in Article 2 (1) (b) of Decision No. 2/76, cited above, and/or the third indent of Article 6 (1) of Decision No. 1/80, cited above, does not cover the situation of a Turkish worker authorized to engage in employment for such time as the effect of a decision refusing him a right of residence, against which he has lodged an appeal which has been dismissed, is suspended."
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 15. maj 1990.
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 15 May 1990.
Generaladvokaten foreslog at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
He proposed that the Court should rule as follows: