natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Grundprincippet er. at der kun indføres sektorspecifikke regler i tilfælde, hvor den generelle konkurrencelov', der gælder for alle sektorer, ikke giver mulighed for at nå det ønskede resultat.
The basic principle is that the Netherlands is not in favour of introducing specific arrangements: sectorspecific rules will be adopted in addition to the Competition Act applicable to all sectors of the economy only if the general arrangements do not achieve the desired result.
Behovet for sektorspecifikke ordninger skal med jævne mellemrum tages op til vurdering, principielt hvert tredje år.
Regular assessment, in principle every three years, must be carried out to determine whether specific arrangements are necessary.
Et behov for specifikke regler medfører ikke automatisk et behov for en særskilt kontrolenhed til at føre tilsyn med gennemførelsen.
If there is a need for specific rules, their implementation will not necessarily have to be monitored by a separate regulator.
Denne funktion kan varetages af det generelle kontrolorgan, den nederlandske konkurrencemyndighed (Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit — NMa), eller af en afdeling tilknyttet denne myndighed.
This task can be entrusted to the general supervisory authority, the Netherlands Competition Authority (Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit or NMa), or a division attached to it.
Det har været nødvendigt at definere de administrative forbindelser mellem konkurrencemyndigheden og andre tilsynsorganer.
The administrative relationship between the Netherlands Competition Authority and any other supervisory bodies, if these are set up, should be carefully defined.
De specifikke kontrolorganer skal således træffe afgørelse vedrørende en række nærmere bestemte spørgsmål i samråd med konkurrencemyndigheden, navnlig hvor der er risiko for divergerende fortolkninger af konkurrenceretlige begreber.
For some decisions, the specific supervisory body will have to come to an agreement with the Competition Authority, in particular if there is a danger of divergent interpretations of certain competition law concepts.
De af regeringen formulerede' grundprincipper er efterfølgende blevet udmøntet i love. lovforslag og hensigtserklæringer.
Since these basic principles were laid down by the Government, they have been formalised in laws, draft laws and declarations of intent.
Den nye lov om telekommunikation er trådt i kraft, og en ny lov om posttjenester er under forberedelse.
A new Telecommunications Act has entered into force and a new Postal Services Act is being prepared.
Der er oprettet et specifikt tilsynsorgan : den uafhængige myndighed for post og telekommunikation (Onafhankelijke Post- en Telecommunicatie Autoriteit — OPTA).
A specific regulator has been set up: the Independent Post and Telecommunications Authority (Onafhankelijke Posten Telecommunicatie Autoriteit or OPTA).
Regeringen agter at pålægge OPTA en forpligtelse til at træffe visse afgørelser i samråd med NMa.
The Government plans to require the OPTA to take certain decisions in agreement with the NMa.
På grundlag af loven om elsektoren, der blev vedtaget i 1998. er der oprettet en tjeneste med ansvar for gennemførelsen og tilsynet med denne lov (Dienst Uitvoering en Toezicht Elektriciteitswet — DTE).
An office responsible for implementing and monitoring the Electricity Act (Dienst Uitvoering en Toezicht Elektriciteitswet or DTE) was set upon the basis of that Act, adopted in 1998.
Denne tjeneste, der er en afdeling under NMa. træffer visse afgørelser i samråd med NMa.
The office takes some decisions in agreement with the NMa. It constitutes a division of the NMa.
Ifølge lovforslaget om gassektoren vil der ikke blive oprettet et specifikt tilsynsorgan for denne sektor, som vil blive kontrolleret af NMa.
Under the draft Gas Act, this sector will be supervised, not by a separate authority, but by the NMa.
Heller ikke i sektoren for offentlig transport (lokal og regional) vil der blive oprettet et særskilt organ; i stedet får NMa tillagt specifikke beføjelser.
Public transport (local and regional) is another area where no separate authority will be set up; rather, the NMa will be assigned specific responsibility for the sector.
Den nuværende konkurrencelovgivning gælder indtil 1. marts 2000. »Restrictive Trade Practices Act« vil dog blive anvendt i en ændret form. idet anmeldelse af aftaler om prisfastsættelse skal ske til generaldirektøren, som fortsat vil have beføjelse til at kræve en anmeldt aftale ændret, såfremt han vurderer, at den pågældende aftale har negative virkninger for konkurrencen.
335 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89; it is also competent to take appropriate measures under Article 21(3) of the same regulation; iv. as regards proceedings in respect of practices which infringe Articles 81(1) and 82: the Competition Tribunal is responsible for ensuring the application in Spain of Articles 81(1) and 82 together with secondary legislation; the SDC is responsible for the procedural application of Articles 81(1) and 82 together with secondary legislation; v.
Den nye lov får ingen direkte indvirkning på den britiske fusionslovgivning.
Act No 66/97 of 30 December 1997 on tax, administrative and social measures (official gazette Ð BoletõÂn Oficial del Estado Ð of 31 December 1997) amended Competition Act No 16/89.
Fusioner vil fortsat blive vurderet i forhold til de relevante bestemmelser i loven fra 1973 om loyal forretningspraksis (Fair Trading Act 1973). og aftaler, der fører til fusioner som omhandlet i ovennævnte lov fra 1973. vil generelt være udelukket fra anvendelsesområdet for loven fra 1998. ligesom konkurrencebegrænsninger vil blive betragtet som afledt af de pågældende aftaler. Regeringen har meddelt, at den vil tågede eksisterende fusionsregler op til nyvurdering, og at et høringsdokumcnt kan forventes offentliggjort i nær fremtid.
Specifically, it added a new article (Article 56), which lays down maximum time limits for proceedings initiated before the Competition Service and Tribunal.
En række ændringer af konkurrenceloven trådte i kraft den I. juli 1998.
A number of amendments to the Competition Act came into force on 1 July.
Procedurereglerne vedrørende appel af visse af konkurrencemyndighedens (Konkurrensverket) afgørelser er ændret.
The redress system was amended as regards certain decisions taken by the Competition Authority (Konkurrensverket).
Afgørelser om ikke-indgreb. fritagelse og påbud skal således fremover appelleres direkte til Markedsdomstolen (Marknadsdomstolen).
Appeals against non-intervention, exemption and injunction decisions, for example, should from now on be brought directly before the highest court, which is the Commercial Court (Marknadsdomstolen).
Sådanne afgørelser skulle tidligere appelleres til domstolen i første instans i Stockholm (Stockholms tingsrätt).
Previously, such appeals had to be brought before the court of first instance, the Stockholm District Court (Stockholms tingsraÈtt).
Ændringerne har til formål at fremskynde sagsbehandlingen, således at de berørte virksomheder hurtigere kan opnå en endelig afgørelse.
This amendment is designed to enable the firms concerned to obtain a final decision more rapidly.
Konkurrencemyndighedens mulighed for at træffe »foreløbige foranstaltninger« er desuden blevet udvidet.
At the same time, the Competition Authority was given greater scope to impose interim measures.
Siden 1. juli 1998 har konkurrencemyndigheden kunnet træffe sådanne afgørelser, hvor der forekommer »specifikke grunde·«, mens der tidligere krævedes »exceptionelle grunde«, f.eks. risiko for eliminering af en konkurrent.
As of 1 July, these decisions may be taken as soon as there is a `particular reason' for doing so, whereas previously `exceptional circumstances' were required, such as the possibility that a competitor might be eliminated.
Konkurrencemyndighedens procedureregler er ligeledes blevet ændret.
APPLICATION OF THE COMPETITION RULES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
I lyset af det igangværende arbejde i Kommissionen har regeringen besluttet at forlænge fristen for anvendelse af forordningen om gruppefritagelse for franchiseaftaler indtil den 30. juni 2000.
In the light of work in progress within the Commission, the Government has decided to extend the block exemption applicable to franchise agreements until 30 June 2000.
Forordningerne om fritagelse for specialiseringsaftaler og aftaler om forskning og udvikling er blevet forlænget indtil den 30. juni 2001.
The exemption rules applicable to specialisation and research and development agreements have been extended to 30 June 2001.
Regeringen har nedsat en arbejdsgruppe, der bl.a. skal undersøge, hvorledes konkurrenceloven skal anvendes på samarbejde mellem små virksomheder.
A working party set up by the Government is considering inter alia the arrangements under the Competition Act with regard to cooperation between small businesses.
I Sverige er en regeringskomité imidlertid ved at undersøge muligheden for at indføre en sådan beføjelse.
The block exemption granted to retail chain stores, specific to Sweden, is also being reviewed as part of that work.
Belgien, Finland, Portugal og Sverige har indberettet, fordi de mente, at de havde særlig interesse for EU's konkurrencepolitik.
The Competition Authority supported most of the proposals, which bring domestic law more into line with Community law.
De procedurer, der var indledt vedrørende bestemmelserne om total dækning i gasselskabernes kontrakter om levering af naturgas, som ansås for at udgøre en overtrædelse af artikel 81 og 82. blev afsluttet, efter at de omhandlede gasselskaber havde opgivet at anvende disse bestemmelser.
The purpose of the Act is to strengthen UK competition law by replacing much of the current system with two prohibitions, closely based on Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty: one concerns agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings or concerted practices which prevent, restrict or distort competition and may affect trade within the UK; the other concerns conduct amounting to the abuse of a dominant position which may likewise affect trade within the UK.
Den tyske konkurrencemyndighed har indledt en procedure i medfør af traktatens artikel 82 og arlikel 22 og 26 i den tyske konkurrencelov (GWB) mod Deutsche' Bahn AG.
The Act provides for exemptions for agreements whose benefits outweigh their anticompetitive effects.
Den tyske konkurrencemyndighed mener, at Deutsche Telekom AG's afvisning af at udlevere samtlige de data. selskabet råder over. til efterspørgerne med henblik på offline-anvendelse, udgør et misbrug af dominerende stilling.
The prohibitions in the Act come into force on 1 March 2000 and at that time will replace the Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1976, the Resale Prices Act 1976 and the greater part of the Competition Act 1980.
Det er konkurrencemyndighedens opfattelse, at den ufuldstændige tilrådighedsstillelse for tredjeparter udgør en alvorlig hindring for potentielle konkurrenters adgang til markederne for oplysningstjenester og fremstilling af telefonbøger.
The new Act will give the DirectorGeneral of Fair Trading improved powers of sanction, investigation and enforcement, including the power to levy fines and impose interim measures.
Den vederlagsordning, der anvendes for levering af oplysninger om abonnenter, udgør i særlig grad et misbrug tig hindrer en reel konkurrence på markederne for de nævnte produkter. Der er indledt en procedure efter EF-traktatens artikel 82 sammenholdt med artikel 47 og 26 i GWB.
It will be applied and enforced by the DirectorGeneral and, in relation to the regulated utility sectors, concurrently by the regulators for telecommunications, gas and electricity, water and sewage treatment, and railway services.
I den omhandlede periode har den tyske højesteret (»Bundesgerichtshof«) stadfæstet en afgørelse om forbud, som den tyske konkurrencemyndighed havde truffet; en anden sag. der var indbragt for appeldomstolen i Berlin (»Kammergericht«), er blevet afsluttet:
A new body, the Competition Commission, will takeover the current role of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission and will also consider appeals against decisions of the DirectorGeneral of Fair Trading and of the regulators.
Retten fandt, at seks forsikringsselskabers oprettelse af Carpartner med henblik på at koncentrere efterspørgslen efter bilaterale aftaler med biludlejningsselskaber om erstatning al' beskadigede køretøjer, førte til en begrænsning af markedspartnernes mulighed for at unddrage sig disse aftaler.
However, the Restrictive Trade Practices Act will apply in a modified form only, requiring formal notification of price-fixing agreements to the Director General, who retains his powers to call in other forms of agreement considered to be anticompetitive.
Appeldomstolen har efterfølgende tilbagekaldt den anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse, der var fremsendt til EF-Domstolen i 1996.
Section 60 of the Act provides that the UK authorities must resolve problems of competition, as far as possible and having regard to any existing differences, in compliance with Treaty principles and European case-law.
Untier behørig hensyntagen til EF-Domstolens retspraksis vurderede karteldomstolen, at en kortvarig spektakulær nedsættelse af prisen på stillingsannoncer i de østrigske dagblade med de største oplag, ikke var i strid med konkurrencereglerne for markedet for tjenesteydelser.
The new Act will have no direct effect on the UK rules on mergers, which will continue to be assessed under the relevant provisions of the Fair Trading Act 1973.
Sagsøgeren har ikke kunnet godtgøre, at sagsøgte fulgte en strategi, der havde til formal at trænge konkurrenter ud af markedet.
Agreements giving rise to mergers within the meaning of the 1973 Act will generally be excluded from the provisions of the 1998 Act, as will restrictions considered ancillary to such agreements.
Følgelig kan det pågældende forlag (sagsøgte), hvis priser p/i annoncer midlertidigt var blevet fastfrosset ved en hastekendelse, pa ny fastsætte dem frit.
The Government has announced its intention to review the effectiveness of the current UK merger rules, and a consultation paper may be published soon.
Hvad angår sagsøgerens andet klagepunkt, hvori det gjordes gældende, at sagsøgtes nægtelse af at optage sagsøgeren i den eneste landsdækkende dagblads-udbringningsordning, der findes i Østrig, udgør en nægtelse af at give adgang til en »essential facility«, afsagde EF-Domstolen dom den 26. november 19982M.
Currently, in seven Member States (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Sweden and the United Kingdom) the competition authorities do not have the power to apply Articles 81(1) and 82 directly.
Karteldomstolen har endnu ikke truffet afgørelse i sagen.
In Sweden, however, a government committee is considering this possibility for the country's authority.
Ved afgørelse 160k7/98 annullerede den østrigske højesteret (Oberster Gerichtshof) i sin egenskab af øverste karteldomstol (Kartellobergericht) en afgørelse om suspension, der var truffet af karteldomstolen vedrørende anmeldelse af et landsdækkende system til bortskaffelse af affald.
Articles 81(1) and 82 were applied in 1998 by the competition authorities in France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
Dette system var ligeledes blevet anmeldt til Kommissionen i 1994. i henhold til artikel 81. stk. 3.
Article 84 was applied by the United Kingdom competition authority.
På baggrund af afgørelsen om annullation var det nødvendigt med en afgørelse fra Kommissionen, som endnu ikke havde indledt en procedure.
Cases involving the application of Article 9 of the Merger Regulation have been mentioned by the French and Netherlands authorities.
Den øverste karteldomstol gjorde i sin begrundelse gældende, at den nationale konkurrenceret skulle anvendes sideløbende med ELJ-retten.
The latter authority, together with the Danish one, has mentioned the application of the notice on cooperation between the Commission and national competition authorities in respect of the application of Articles 81 and 82.
Eftersom en eventuel tilladelse fra Kommissionen ikke i sig selv kan danne grundlag for den nationale myndigheds afgørelse, kan en procedure, der er indledt i medfør af den østrigske konkurrencelov, ikke suspenderes.
This chapter also contains a summary of decisions based on domestic law reported by the national competition authorities of Austria, Belgium, Finland, Portugal and Sweden, owing mainly to their significance from a Community point of view.
I en appelsag, der var rejst mod en afgørelse truffet af konkurrencerådet, fastslog appeldomstolen i Bruxelles, at den omhandlede ordning med bindende udsalgspriser var forbudt.
In the Oscar Bronner v Mediaprint case, which had been pending in Austria since 1995 and, in the meantime, also partly before the Court of Justice of the European Communities through a reference for a preliminary ruling, the Restrictive Practices Court (Kartellgericht) handed down a final judgment, upheld by the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof Ð 1 Ok 5/98), on the count of predatory pricing.
Konkurrencerådet gjorde i sin afgørelse gældende, at bindende udsalgspriser, der påtvinges forhandlerne, er en ulovlig konkurrencebegrænsende praksis og ikke kan omfattes af en fritagelse.
Having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice, the Restrictive Practices Court held that the act of reducing spectacularly and for a short period the price charged for publishing job advertisements in the largest-circulation Austrian daily newspapers was not a measure in restraint of competition in the area of provision of services.
Appelretten i Bruxelles stadfæstede konkurrencerådets afgørelse og fastslog, at forbrugeren ikke sikres en rimelig andel af en eventuel fordel ved bindende udsalgspriser, og at disse derfor ikke kan omfattes af en fritagelse.
The plaintiff had been unable to prove that the defendant was pursuing a deliberate strategy of squeezing competitors out of the market. Consequently, the publishing house (the defendant), whose advertising rates had been temporarily frozen by interim order, will be able to set them freely once more.
Den mest bemærkelsesværdige koncentrationssag. som konkurrencerådet behandlede i 1998. var den i april 1998 anmeldte fusion, hvorved Cognizant ville erhverve kontrollen på verdensplan over Pharmaceutical Marketing Services (PMSI).
On the second matter complained of by the plaintiff, who argued that inclusion in the only daily newspaper home-delivery scheme in Austria, which was operated by the defendant, was an essential facility, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment on 26 November.250 The Court ruled that, although the national court's decision was in fact based on Article 35 of the Austrian Restrictive Practices Act (Kartellgesetz) and not on Article 82 of the EC Treaty, a conflict was capable of arising between national law and Community law, with the result that the reference for a preliminary ruling was justified and that, in the present case, owing to the existence of other means of distributing daily newspapers, non-inclusion in a home-delivery scheme did not constitute an abuse of a dominant position within the meaning of Article 82.
Da der herskede alvorlig tvivl om denne transaktions lovlighed, blev strukturen ændret.
The Restrictive Practices Court's judgment is still awaited.
Eftersom forkøbsretten til et af datterselskaberne allerede var blevet udnyttet ved indledningen af den anden lase pålagde konkurrencerådet parterne at give tilsagn om at opløse fusionen og sælge de erhvervede kapitalandele.
In its judgment 16Ok7/98, the Supreme Court, in its capacity as Supreme Restrictive Practices Court (Kartellobergericht), annulled a suspension order of the Restrictive Practices Court concerning the
:'" Sag C-7/97.
Case C-7/97.
ANVENDELSEN AF KONKURRENCEREGLERNE I DEN EUROPÆISKE UNION
APPLICATION OF THE COMPETITION RULES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION notification of an Austria-wide waste-disposal system.
Klagen vedrørte et cirkulære, som Danmarks Automobilforhandler Forening (DAF) havde udsendt til sine medlemmer.
The system had also been notified to the Commission in 1994 under Article 81(3).
Hermed opfordrede DAF de danske bilforhandlere til prisdifferentiere over for ikke-danske købere.
The annulment order necessitated a decision on the part of the Commission, which had not yet officially initiated proceedings.
Efter konkurrencelovens § 6 er sådanne initiativer fra en brancheforening forbudt, fordi de kan føre til en ensartet prisadfærd og begrænse afsætningen til bestemte kundegrupper.
The Supreme Restrictive Practices Court justified its decision on the ground that national restrictive practices law had to be applied in parallel with the relevant Community law.
Konkurrencerådet pålagde DAF at trække opfordringen tilbage og at udsende et rettelsescirktilære om forhandleravance ved salg til EU-borgere.
In view of the fact that an authorisation by the European Commission cannot on its own serve as a basis for the national authority's decision, proceedings instituted under Austrian restrictive practices law cannot be suspended.
I ovennævnte fabrik blev der i 1960'erne udviklet en teknik, hvormed det var muligt på samme tid at fremstille propylenoxid og styrolmonomer.
Hearing an appeal from a decision of the Competition Council, the Brussels Court of Appeal held that resale price maintenance was prohibited.
SDC erfarede gennem presseudklip, at de to parter havde indgået et forlig, som bragte den langvarige tvist til ophør og fjernede de vigtigste konkurrencebegrænsninger. Dernæst indledte SDC en fortrolig undersøgelse (ref.
The Competition Council had established in 1997 that a system of resale prices imposed on individual retailers constituted an agreement in restraint of competition and did not qualify for exemption.
LANE. hvormed domstolen pålagde 'LABACALFRA at levere alle de mærker forarbejdet tobak, selskabet producerer i en seksmåneders periode, til MC. LANE pa ikkediskriminerende betingelser.
The Court of Appeal upheld the Council's decision, finding that the system did not allow consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit and therefore could not be exempted.
ANVENDELSEN AF KONKURRENCEREGLERNE I MEDLEMSSTATERNE
Given that there were serious doubts about the lawfulness of the operation, its structure was modified.
TABACALERA har monopol på fremstilling af tobak på det pågældende marked og indtager de facto en dominerende stilling på markedet for engrosdistribution og import af forarbejdet tobak. Selv om MC.
The new structure provides for the acquisition by IMS of some of PMSI's businesses, including the European and Japanese subsidiaries, but excluding the Belgian ones, for which a stock option plan was drawn up.
LANE. som ikke var blevet besvaret. Domstolen anmodede konkurrencemyndigheden om at bekræfte eksistensen af disse tilbud og i givet fald at bekræfte, om Domstolens afgørelse var efterkommet.
In view of the fact that the stock option in respect of one of the subsidiaries had already been exercised during the second phase, the Council required the parties to undertake to dissolve the merger and sell the shares acquired.
Domstolen afviste ved afgørelse af 15. juli 1998 konkurrencemyndighedens anmodning om vedtagelse af retsbevarende foranstaltninger, fremsat på foranledning af klagerne Federación Española de Hoteles (FEH). Agrupación Hotelera de las Zonas Turísticas de España (ZONTUR). Sol Meliá S.A. (Sol Meliá). Ciga International Hotels Corporation S.A. (Ciga International). Cigahotels España S.A. (Cigahotels) og NH Hoteles S.A. (NH Hoteles).
By virtue of the Commission notice on cooperation with Member States' competition authorities, the Competition Council investigated a complaint which had been referred to it by the Commission.