natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder; samme kvali­fikationer hos ansøgere af forskelligt køn; fortrins-
Equal treatment of men and women; equally qualified male and female candidates; priority for female candidates; saving clause; compli­ance with European rules.
staten Nordrhein-Westfalen indeholder en særlig bestemmelse, i henhold til hvilken kvinderne ikke får fortrinsstilling ved forfremmelse, hvis der er forhold knyttet til en mandlig medansøgers person, der vejer tungere.
Court of Justice judgment of 17 October 1995, Case C-450/93 Kalanke ν Freie Hansestadt Bre­men [1995] ECR 1-3051
Referencer: Rådets direktiv 76/207/EØF — EFT L 39 af 14.2.1976 og Bull.
Seat of the institutions; European Parliament; part-sessions in Strasbourg.
2-1976, punkt 2210 Domstolens dom af 17. september 1995, Eekhard Kalanke mod Freie Hansestadt Bremen — Sml. I, 1995, side 1-3051
The Court annulled the vote of the European Parliament of 20 September 1995 adopting the calendar of part-sessions for 1996 and providing for 11 plenary sessions in Strasbourg instead of 12.
Domstolen konkluderer, at en sådan bestemmelse medfører en garanti for, at der ikke gives absolut og ubetinget fortrinsstilling til kvinder, og at den nationale regel ikke er i modstrid med direktiv 76/ 207/EØF, på betingelse af at de anvendte kriterier ikke stiller kvindelige ansøgere ringere.
The Court held that Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment enabled a Member State to intro­duce national rules providing that women are to be given priority for promotion in cases where the male and female candidates are equally qual­ified, on condition that such national rules con-
Sag C-244/95, P. Moskof AE modcEthinikos organismos Kapnou, Domstolens dom af 20. november 1997 (Femte Afdeling).
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance
Landbrug; råtobak; monetære foranstaltninger; landbrugsomregningskurser; vurdering af en for­ordnings retsgyldighed; princippet om ikke tilbage­virkende kraft.
The Court's ruling in this case clarified certain aspects of the management committee proce­dure.
I det pågældende tilfælde er det fastsat i lovgivnin­gen for delstaten Nordrhein-Westfalen, at hvis kvinderne i en bestemt erhvervssektor er i mindre­tal i forhold til mænd på det pågældende stillingsniveau, skal kvinderne forfremmes først, hvis kva­lifikationerne er de samme, med mindre der er et forhold knyttet til en mandlig medansøgers person, der vejer tungere.
In this particular case the legislation of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia provided that where, in a given sector, there were fewer women than men in the career bracket concerned, women were to be given priority for promotion in the event of equal suitability, unless reasons specific to an individual male candidate tilted the bal­ance in his favour.
I det pågældende tilfælde forelagde Kommissionen et udkast til forordning vedrørende landbrugsom­regningskurser for den ansvarlige forvaltningsko­mité den 11. juni 1993.
On 11 June 1993 the Commission had submitted to the competent management committee a draft regulation concerning the agricultural conver­sion rate.
Komitéen godkendte udka­stet samme dag, men to delegationer stemte imod.
The committee approved the draft the same day, but two delegations voted against it.
Kommissionen vedtog ikke umiddelbart det af ko­mitéen godkendte udkast, fordi den ønskede at fin­de en mere tilfredsstillende formulering af hensyn til de to delegationer, der havde stemt imod det op­rindelige udkast.
The Commission did not immediately adopt the draft approved by the committee but endeav­oured to reword the text in terms more accept­able to the two delegations which had voted against it.
Et nyt udkast blev forelagt for ko­mitéen men ikke forelagt formelt til godkendelse.
A new draft was then presented to the committee, although it was not submitted for­mally for approval.
Senere den 17. december 1993 vedtog Kommissio­nen det oprindelige udkast med tilbagevirkende gyldighed uden igen at forelægge det for komitéen.
On 17 December 1993 the Commission finally adopted the original draft without resubmitting it to the committee. The regulation thus adopted had retroactive effect.
Domstolen anerkender, at der i tilfælde af samme kvalifikationer er en tendens til at forfremme en mand i stedet for en kvinde på grund af visse for­domme og stereotype forestillinger om kvindernes rolle og evner på arbejdsmarkedet, og der er en frygt for, at kvinderne i højere grad afbryder deres karriere som følge af huslige og familiære forplig­telser.
The Court acknowledged that, even where male and female candidates were equally qualified, male candidates tended to be promoted in pref­erence to female candidates, largely as a result of certain prejudices and stereotyped ideas con­cerning the role and capacities of women in working life and the fear that women would interrupt their careers more frequently because of household and family duties.
Der er stillet spørgsmålstegn ved den af Kommis­sionen vedtagne forordnings retsgyldighed med den begrundelse, at det oprindeligt for komitéen forelagte udkast var blevet trukket tilbage, og at den vedtagne tekst var væsentligt forskelligt fra det oprindelige udkast, idet der nu var tale om tilbage­virkende gyldighed.
The validity of the Commission regulation was contested on the grounds that the original draft had been withdrawn and that the text adopted was different in substance from the first draft in that it had retroactive effect.
I et sådant tilfælde skulle det vedtagne udkast have været forelagt for komitéen.
The draft finally adopted should therefore have been submitted to the committee.
Domstolen er af den opfattelse, at forvaltningsko­mitéproceduren er overholdt af Kommissionen.
The Court held that the management committee procedure had been properly observed by the Commission.
Domstolen minder om, at den i »Kalanke«-dom-men fastslog, at en national bestemmelse, som automatisk ved forfremmelse giver fortrinsstilling til kvindelige kandidater, der har samme kvalifika­tioner som de mandlige medansøgeres på områder, hvor kvinderne er i mindretal på et stillingsniveau, strider imod fællesskabsretten, idet den medfører kønsbetinget forskelsbehandling.
The Court recalled that in Kalanke it had held that a national rule entailed discrimination on grounds of sex and was therefore at odds with Community law if it automatically gave priority for promotion to female candidates who pos­sessed qualifications equivalent to those of their male competitors in sectors where women were outnumbered by men at the level of the post in question.
Imidlertid understreger Domstolen, at der i det på­gældende tilfælde er tale om, at lovgivningen i del­
In this particular case, however, the Court noted that the North Rhine-Westphalia legislation included a saving clause whereby women were not to be given priority for promotion if reasons specific to an individual male candidate tilted the balance in his favour.
Domstolen fastslår, at Kommissionen ikke havde trukket det oprindelige for komitéen forelagte ud­kast tilbage.
The Court held that in this particular case the retroactive effect given to the regulation finally adopted could not be described as a change in substance to the draft approved by the commit­tee.
Den mener, at ønsket om at finde
Further consultation of the committee was
Domstolen er af den opfattelse, at Rådet ikke har overskredet sin ændringsbeføjelse i henhold til EØF-traktatens artikel 149.
Page 149
Social sikring; særlige ikke-bidragspligtige ydelser; invalidepension; ikke mulighed for at modtage ydelsen i et andet land.
In this case the Court ruled that a special noncontributory benefit for disabled persons could not be exported.
Det var derfor ikke nød­vendigt med en ny høring af komitéen.
not therefore required.
Domstolen gør opmærksom på, at forordningens tilbagevir­kende gyldighed ikke var skadevoldende for de på­gældende tobaksavlere.
As the Court pointed out, the regulation's retroactive effect had not resulted in any losses to the traders concerned.
Sag C-408/95, Eurotunnel SA m.fl. mod Sea France m.fl., Domstolens dom af 11. november 1997 (samtlige Domstolens medlemmer).
Case C-408/95 Eurotunnel and Others ν Sea France and Others, Court judgment of 11 November 1997 (Full Court).
Skatter og afgifter; overgangsordning for afgiftsfrie butikker; vurdering af direktivernes retsgyldighed; manglende grund til at betvivle retsgyldigheden.
Excise duties; transitional arrangements for taxfree shops; validity of directives; absence of fac­tors affecting validity.
Referencer: Rådets direktiv 91/680/EØF — EFT L 376 af 31.12.1991 og Bull.
References: Council Directive 91/680/EEC: OJ L 376, 31.12.1991; Bull.
12-1991, punkt 1.2.44 Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF — EFT L 76 af 23.3.1992 og Bull. 1/21992, punkt 1.3.9
12-1991, point 1.2.44 Council Directive 92/12/EEC: OJ L 76, 23.3.1992; Bull.
Kelvin Snares fik efter at have arbejdet i 25 år som lønmodtager i Det Forenede Kongerige tildelt inva­lidepension som følge af en ulykke.
Mr Snares, who had worked in the United King­dom as an employee for 25 years, had received a disability living allowance (DLA) following an accident.
Kort tid efter besluttede han at bosætte sig på Tenerife og under­rettede den britiske administration.
Shortly afterwards he had decided to settle in Tenerife and had informed the UK au­thorities accordingly.
Denne beslut­tede så, at ophæve hans ret til invalidepension fra han rejste ud af landet, idet denne ydelse er betin­get af en pligt til bopæl i den stat, der betaler den i henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71, som æn­dret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1247/92, hvori denne form for ydelse er klassificeret som en sær­lig ikke-bidragspligtig ydelse.
The authorities had then decided to discontinue his entitlement to DLA with effect from his departure, eligibility being subject to a condition of residence in the Mem­ber State awarding the benefit, as provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92, which lists this type of allowance as a special noncontributory benefit.
Rådet har enstemmigt ændret Kommissionens for­slag, således at afgiftsfrit salg i forbindelse med rejse med skib eller fly inden for Fællesskabet op­retholdes.
The Court confirmed the validity of the provi­sions of Council Directives 91/680/EEC and 92/ 12/EEC on taxfree sales on journeys involving the crossing of frontiers.
Domstolen gør opmærksom på, at den allerede har accepteret, at ydelser, der er snævert knyttet til de arbejdsmarkedsmæssige rammer, kan tildeles under forbehold af en betingelse om bopæl og ophold i
The Court pointed out that it had in the past ac­cepted that the grant of benefits closely linked with the social environment might be made sub­ject to a condition of residence in the State of the competent institution.
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans den stat, hvori den ansvarlige institution er belig­gende, hvilket er tilfældet for DLA-ydelsen.
The Council had unanimously amended the Commission proposals for the maintenance of taxfree sales on board ships or aircraft crossing intraCommunity frontiers.
Domstolen understreger i øvrigt, at medlemssta­terne på grund af manglende harmonisering af det sociale sikringssystem fortsat har beføjelser til at fastsætte betingelserne for tildeling af sociale ydel­ser, også til at gøre dem strengere, hvis blot de ikke medfører åben eller skjult forskelsbehandling af Fællesskabets arbejdstagere.
The Court also pointed out that, in the absence of harmonisation in social security matters, the Member States remained competent to define the conditions for granting social security bene­fits, even if they made them more strict, pro­vided the conditions adopted did not give rise to overt or disguised discrimination between Com­munity workers.
Domstolen konstaterede, at den franske ordensmagt i sådanne situationer enten ikke var til stede, til trods for at de ansvarlige myndigheder i adskillige tilfælde havde fået oplysninger om, at der var de­monstrationer, eller ikke skred ind, når de var på stedet.
The Court held that the Council had not exceeded its power to make amendments under Article 149 of the EEC Treaty. By virtue of the powers conferred at that time by Article 149(1) of the EEC Treaty (now Article 189a(l) of the EC Treaty), the Council could amend a proposal from the Commission provided it acted unani­mously.
I øvrigt er kun et minimalt antal personer, der har deltaget i sådanne alvorlige brud på den of­fentlige orden, blevet identificeret og retsforfulgt.
The Court also held that the amendment in question was within the scope of the direc­tives concerned, despite the Commission's opposition thereto.
Domstolen fastslår endvidere, at den koordinering, der er indført med fællesskabsforordningerne, be­skytter lønmodtagernes interesser, i det omfang op­holds- og bopælslandet er forpligtet til at tage hen­syn til elementer, der har at gøre med andre med­lemslande (beskæftigelses- og bopælsperioder, konstatering af invaliditet eller handicap, tildeling af ydelser).
Lastly, the Court drew attention to the fact that the coordination arrangements introduced by Community regulations protected workers' interests, to the extent that the Member State of residence was required to take account of events which had taken place in other Member States (periods of employment and residence, recog­nition of invalidity or disability, grant of bene­fits).
I øvrigt er der med forordning (EØF) nr. 1247/92 indført den regel, at retten til ydelser ikke kan gøres betinget af, at ansøgeren tidligere har været omfattet af de sociale sikringsbestemmelser i det land, i hvilket der anmodes om ydel­sen.
Moreover, Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 had established that the entitlement to benefit was not subject to the condition that the clai­mant had previously been covered by the social security legislation of the State in which he was applying for benefit.
Erstatningssøgsmål; erstatning uden for kontrakt; mælk; tillægsafgift; referencemængde; forordning (EØF) nr. 2055/93; skadesløsholdelse af producen­ter; forældelse.
References: Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71: OJ L 149, 5.7.1971
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans det pågældende referenceår i henhold til en forplig­telse til ikke-markedsføring i henhold til en forord­ning fra Rådet fra 1977.
Some producers, however, had not produced any milk in that reference year, having signed an under­taking not to market milk pursuant to a Council regulation of 1977.
De blev således udelukket fra enhver form for mælkeproduktion.
They had consequently been prevented from producing any milk at all.
Lige løn til mænd og kvinder; EF-traktatens artikel 119; protokol nr. 2; erhvervstilknyttede sociale sik­ringsordninger; deltidsarbejdere afskåret fra en sta­tus, der giver ret til visse tillægsydelser i relation til alderspension; begyndelsesdatoen for beregnin­gen af disse ydelser; nationale regler om frister for fremsættelse af krav.
For over a decade the Commission had regularly received complaints concerning the passivity of the French authorities in the face of violent acts committed by private individuals against agri­cultural products from other Member States (interception of lorries, destruction of the goods carried, violence against lorry drivers, threats to supermarkets, damage to goods displayed in French shops, intimidation of wholesale and retail traders whose supplies were not exclu­sively of French origin).
I 1989 vedtog Rådet en anden forordning med det formål at tildele disse producenter en kvote svarende til 60 % af den mængde, der blev leveret i året forud for forpligtelsen til ikke-mar­kedsføring i 1977.
In 1989 it adopted another regulation, whereby these producers were awarded a quota equivalent to 60 % of the quantity delivered in the year preceding the beginning of the nonmarketing undertaking of 1977.
Denne forordning blev ligeledes erklæret ugyldig af Kommissionen. Rådet gav så endelig de pågældende producenter mulighed for at producere den samlede mængde, der blev leveret året forud for indgåelsen af forpligtelsen.
This regulation was declared invalid in its turn, and the Council finally decided that the producers in question should be allowed to produce the entirety of the quantity delivered in the year preceding the nonmarketing undertaking.
Det første drejede sig om, fra hvilken dato beskæftigelsesperioder for deltidsan­satte arbejdstagere, der er udsat for indirekte kønsbetinget forskelsbehandling, skal tages i betragt­ning med henblik på beregning af de tillægsydel­ser, de har ret til.
The Court pointed out that the free movement of goods was one of the fundamental principles of the EC Treaty and that it must be understood as requiring the elimination of all barriers to imports in intraCommunity trade.
Visse producenter med betegnelsen SLOM III blev imidlertid ikke omfattet af denne nye lovgivning, i det omfang de havde overtaget driften af et andet landbrugsareal, der var omfattet af den forpligtelse til ikke-markedsføring af mælk, der var indgået af den foregående ejer.
Certain producers (known as the 'SLOM III pro­ducers') did not qualify for this new arrange­ment, however, having taken over other agricul­tural land covered by a nonmarketing undertaking entered into by the previous owner.
De blev således udelukket fra at producere mælk på dette andet areal i henhold til forordningen fra 1984, og forbuddet blev for­længet af Rådet i forordningen fra 1989.
They had therefore been prevented from produc­ing milk on this other land by virtue of the 1984 regulation. This prohibition was extended by the 1989 regulation.
Denne bestemmelse blev herefter kendt ugyldig.
The 1989 regulation was declared invalid in its turn.
Tilbage bliver at disse producenter har været fuld­stændig udelukket fra at producere på deres andet areal mellem 1984 og 1992.
The fact remained, however, that between 1984 and 1992 these farmers had been prevented from producing any milk at all on the newly acquired land.
De har derfor indbragt et erstatningssøgsmål mod Fællesskabet.
They had therefore brought an action for damages against the Community.
Dom­stolen præciserer i øvrigt, at arbejdstageren ikke ville have interesse i at være tilsluttet en ordning, hvis dette ikke giver ret til ydelser i henhold til den pågældende ordning.
Joined Cases T-195/94 and T-202/94 Quiller and Hausmann ν Council and Commis­sion, Court of First Instance judgment of 9 December 1997 (First Chamber, extended composition).
Den dømte derfor Rådet og Kommissionen til at skadesløsholde sagsøgerne.
Action for damages; non-contractual liability; milk; additional levy; reference quantity; Regu­
Domstolen svarede, at en sådan regel faktisk stri­der mod fællesskabsretten, idet den gør det umuligt i praksis for borgere, som påberåber sig fælles-
The Court held that the need to limit milk sur­pluses could not justify restrictions which did not take into account the specific circumstances of the farmers in question, who had been pre-
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans fra i gennemførelsesperioden at træffe foranstalt­ninger, der er egnede til at bringe virkeliggørelsen af direktivets målsætning i fare.
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance limited to a period beginning two years before the date on which the claim was lodged.
skabsretten i hovedsagen at hævde krav.
vented from producing milk over a very long pe­riod.
Domstolen er af den opfattelse, at selv om man ikke, inden gennemførelsesfristen er udløbet, kan bebrejde en medlemsstat, at den ikke har omsat et direktiv til national lovgivning, påhviler det dog denne medlemsstat i gennemførelsesperioden at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger til at sikre, at direktivets målsætning er nået ved udløbet af gennemførelsesperioden.
Such a rule did not simply limit, in the interests of legal cer­tainty, the retroactive effect of a claim for cer­tain benefits; it affected the very nature of the rights conferred by the Community legal order, and limited in time the direct effect of Article 119 of the Treaty in cases where no such limita­tion had been laid down either in the case­law of the Court or in Protocol No 2 annexed to the Treaty on European Union.
Sag C-129/96, Inter-Miljø Wallonie ASBL mod Region wallonne, Domstolens dom af 18. december 1997 (samtlige domstolens medlem­mer).
Case C­129/96 Inter­Environnement Wallonie ν Région Wallonne, Court judgment of 18 December 1997 (Full Court).
Domstolen tilføjede, at det tilkommer den natio­nale dommer i forbindelse med en gyldighedsundersøgelse at vurdere, om de nationale bestemmel­ser, der er vedtaget, er egnede til at bringe virkelig­gørelsen af direktivets målsætning i fare.
Equal pay for male and female workers; Article 119 of the EC Treaty; Protocol No 2; occupa­tional social security schemes; exclusion of part­time workers from status conferring entitlement to certain additional pension benefits; date from which such benefits must be calculated; national procedural time limits.
Direktiv; frist for gennemførelse; begrebet affald.
Directive; deadline for transposai; concept of 'waste'.
I denne sag har domstolen inden for rammerne af en procedure på grundlag af traktatens artikel 177 afsagt dom om, at EØF-traktatens artikel 5, andet afsnit og artikel 189, tredje afsnit pålægger de medlemsstater et direktiv er rettet til, at afholde sig
In these proceedings, which were based on Arti­cle 177 of the Treaty, the Court held that the second paragraph of Article 5 and the third para­graph of Article 189 of the EEC Treaty required the Member States to which a directive was ad­dressed to refrain, during the period prescribed for transposai, from taking any measures liable seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the directive.
Derfor må den nationale dommer skelne mellem foreløbige bestemmelser eller bestemmelser til gennemførelse af direktivet i etaper og bestemmel­ser, der fremlægges som værende en endelig og fuldstændig omsættelse af direktivet til national lovgivning, hvor den manglende overensstemmelse med direktivet lader ane, at resultatet ikke kan nås inden for den fastsatte tidsfrist.
Basing itself on earlier rulings, the Court held that since the judgment given in Bilka had placed no limitation on its effects in time, the direct effect of Article 119 could be relied on as from 8 April 1976 (the date of the judgment in Defrenne, in which that article was first held to have direct effect) in order retroactively to claim equal treatment as regards the right to join an occupational pension scheme.
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning om kon­klusionerne fra Det Europæiske Råds møder i Luxembourg den 21. november og den 12. og 13. de­cember 1997 og om det luxembourgske formand skab.
Parliament resolution on the conclusions of the Luxembourg European Council of 21 November and 12 and 13 December 1997 and on the term of office of the Luxembourg Presidency. References:
Referencer: Konklusionerne fra Det Europæiske Råds ekstra­ordinære møde i Luxembourg om beskæftigelse — Bull.
Conclusions of the special Luxembourg Euro­pean Council on employment: Bull. 11-1997, points LI et seq.
111997, punkt 1.1 ff. Konklusionerne fra Det Europæiske Råds møde i Luxembourg — punkt 1.2 i denne Bulletin interesse vil blive drøftet af ministre fra alle med­lemsstater.
Conclusions of the Luxembourg European Council: point 1.2 of this Bulletin matters of common interest would nevertheless be discussed by the ministers of all the Member States.
Det beklager dog, at Det Europæiske Råd ikke var i stand til at udpege den kommende leder af Centralbanken.
However, it expressed regret that the European Council had failed to appoint the future governor of the Central Bank.