natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den franske regering har ikke bestridt, at direktivet ikke er blevet gennemført inden for den fastsatte frist Den har anført, at et lovforslag, der sikrer direktivets gennemførelse, skal vedtages af parlamentet
It states that a draft law which will implement the Directive is about to be adopted by Parliament.
I denne forbindelse er det tilstrækkeligt at bemærke, dels at en national lovgivnings uoverensstemmelse med fællesskabsretlige bestemmelser, også hvor disse sidste er umiddelbart anvendelige, ifølge fast praksis kun kan fjernes helt ved bindende interne regler med samme retlige karakter som de regler, de ændrer, dels at direktivbestemmelser skal gennemføres ved bestemmelser, hvis bindende virkning er uomtvistelig, og som er tilstrækkelig specifikke, bestemte og klare til, at de er i overensstemmelse med retssikkerhedsprincippet, som indebærer, at de af direktivet omfattede personer i det omfang, det ved direktivet tilsigtes at skabe rettigheder for den enkelte, sættes i stand til at få fuldt kendskab til deres rettigheder.
None the less it maintains, first, that the occupational schemes in question are freely determined and modified by workers and employers both in the national legislative context and in accordance with Community law, secondly, that a large proportion of the private schemes had already undergone the necessary modifications prior to adoption of the Directive, and lastly that, in accordance with the principles of the direct effect and primacy of Community law, the last paragraph of Article L 913-1 of the Social Security Code, which permits discrimination in the determination of retirement age and the conditions for awarding reversionary pensions, may not be relied upon by parties to proceedings in French courts.
Regeringen har imidlertid for det første gjort gældende, at de pågældende erhvervstilknyttede ordninger frit fastsættes og ændres af arbejdsmarkedets parter inden for rammerne af national ret og under overholdelse af fællesskabsretten, og dernæst, at en stor del af de private ordninger allerede havde været genstand for de nødvendige tilpasninger, inden direktivet blev vedtaget og endelig, at det følger af princippet om fællesskabsrettens direkte virkning og forrang, at borgerne ikke kan påberåbe sig
It is enough to observe in this regard that the Court has consistently held that the incompatibility of national legislation with Community provisions, even provisions which are directly applicable, can be finally remedied only by means of national provisions of a binding nature which have the same legal force as those which must be amended, and that the provisions of a directive must be implemented with unquestionable binding force and with the specificity, precision and clarity required in order to satisfy the requirement of legal certainty, under which, in the case of a directive intended to confer rights on individuals, persons concerned must be enabled to ascertain the full extent of their rights.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling') den 20. maj 1999.
Advocate General A La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 20 May 1999.
Sag C-203/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Belgien Fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser
Case C-203/98 Commission of the European Communities ν Kingdom of Belgium Freedom to provide services
»Traktatbrudssøgsmål — EF-traktatens artikel 6 og 52 (efter ændring nu artikel 12 EF og 43 EF) — luftfart — registrering af luftfartøjer* (Fjerde Afdeling)
(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Articles 6 and 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 12 EC and 43 EC) — Air traffic — Registration of aircraft) (Fourth Chamber) registered in Belgium by 'foreigners authorised to establish their domicile in Belgium or authorised to reside in Belgium and who have been resident there continuously for at least one year' and '... foreign legal persons that have had a place of business, agency or office in the Kingdom of Belgium for at least one year' respectively.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 28. maj 1998 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EF-traktatens artikel 6, 52 og 59 (efter ændring nu artikel 12 EF, 43 EF og 49 EF) ved at kræve, at erhvervsdrivende inden for EF skal have haft bopæl eller have været etableret i et år i Belgien for at kunne få registreret luftfartøjer i denne stat, og ved at nægte dem de ansøgte flyvetilladelser, hvorved det således uberettiget eller uforholdsmæssigt har hindret midlertidig eller varig præstation af andre tjenesteydelser på luftfartsområdet end transportydelser.
By an application lodged at the Registry of the Court on 28 May 1998, the Commission of the European Communities has brought an action for a declaration that, by requiring that Community operators be resident or established for one year in Belgium before they can register aircraft there and by refusing to authorise flights requested by them, thus unjustifiably or excessively hindering the temporary or permanent provision of services in the field of air traffic other than for transport, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 6, 52 and 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 12 EC, 43 EC and 49 EC).
Som følge af de bemærkninger, den belgiske regering har fremført i svarskriftet, har Kommissionen begrænset stævningens genstand til spørgsmålet om den kongelige anordnings uforenelighed med traktatens artikel 6 og 52 og har frafaldet påstanden vedrørende artikel 59.
In the light of the observations submitted by the Belgian Government in its defence, the Commission restricted the scope of its application to the incompatibility of the Royal Decree with Articles 6 and 52 of the Treaty and withdrew the part of its action based on Article 59.
*1) Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EF-traktatens artikel 6 og 52 (efter ændring nu artikel 12 EF og 43 EF) ved at kræve, at erhvervsdrivende inden for EF skal have haft bopæl eller have været etableret i et år i Belgien for at kunne få registreret luftfartøjer i denne stat
The second subparagraph, points (c) and (d), of Article 3(3) of the Royal Decree of 15 March 1954 regulating air traffic (hereinafter 'the Royal Decree') establishes a special regime for foreigners under which aircraft may only be
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (TFjerde Afdeling
Declares that, by requiring Community operators to be resident or established for one year in Belgium before they can register aircraft there, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed tofidfil its obligations under Articles 6 and 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 12 EC and 43 EC);
Sag C-178/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Case C-178/98 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic Approximation of laws
»Traktatbrud — direktiv 911157¡EØF om batterier og akkumulatorer, der indeholder f årlige stoffer — medlemsstatens manglende indførelse af de i direktivets artikel 6 omhandlede programmer* (Femte Afdeling) akkumulatorer samt vedrørende mulighederne for genanvendelse særskilt bortskaffelse af brugte batterier og akkumulatorer henhørende under bilag I.
(Failure to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/157/EEC on batteries and accumulators containing certain dangerous substances — Failure of a Member State to adopt the programmes provided for by Article 6 of the Directive) (Fifth Chamber)
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 14. maj 1998 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Franske Republik ikke har overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til Rådets direktiv 91/157/EØF af 18. marts 1991, idet den ikke har truffet og/eller givet meddelelse om alle de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivets artikel 6.
March 1991, the French Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
»Medlemsstaterne udarbejder programmer med henblik på følgende mål:
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court on 14 May 1998, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to adopt and/or communicate all the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/157/EEC of 18
— mindskelse aftungmetalindholdet i batterier og akkumulatorer
'Member States shall draw up programmes in order to achieve the following objectives:
Den franske regering har gjort gældende, at de fem mål, der er nævnt i direktivets artikel 6, er nået eller er ved at blive det som følge af forskellige foranstaltninger truffet af de nationale myndigheder. Regeringen har erkendt, at disse foranstaltninger ikke har form af programmer, men den har gjort gældende, at det traktatbrud, den hævdes at have begået er rent formelt, da de nævnte foranstaltninger dækker målene i direktivets artikel 6.
reduction of the heavy-metal content of batteries and accumulators, up programmes laid down by Article 6 of the Directive, given that it does not intend to review and update them regularly and that there is no clear timetable for such updating, which ought to take place at least every four years, in the light in particular of technical progress and of the economic and environmental situation.
— fremme af markedsføring af batterier og akkumulatorer, der indeholder mindre mængder af farlige stoffer, og/eller som indeholder mindre forurenende stoffer
promotion of research aimed at reducing the dangerous-substance content and favouring the use of less polluting substitute substances in batteries and accumulators, and research into methods of recycling, separate disposal of spent batteries and accumulators covered by Annex I.
Det må konstateres, at direktivets artikel 6 for at nå målene med direktivet pålægger medlemsstaterne at udarbejde programmer og dernæst at kontrollere og ajourføre dem regelmæssigt.
Whilst acknowledging that those measures are not in the form of programmes, it submits that, since the objectives of Article 6 of the Directive are met by those measures, the failure to fulfil obligations of which it is accused is purely a matter of form.
— gradvis nedbringelse af mængden af brugte batterier og akkumulatorer henhørende under bilag I i husholdningsaffald
First, it should be observed that Article 6 requires Member States, in pursuit of its objectives, to draw up programmes and then to review and update them regularly.
I denne forbindelse følger det af ordlyden af artikel 6 og af direktivets generelle opbygning, at de forskellige problemer i forbindelse med særligt affald som batterier og akkumulatorer skal løses inden for en præcis tidsplan.
In that connection, it follows from the wording of Article 6 and the general scheme of the Directive that the various problems posed by specific waste such as batteries and accumulators are to be resolved according to a precise timetable.
— fremme af forskning vedrørende nedbringelse af indholdet af farlige stoffer, anvendelse af mindre forurenende erstatningsstoffer i batterier og
Second, it must be noted that, even if certain results relating to the objectives of the Directive have been achieved before the expiry of the period prescribed thereby for the implementation of programmes, that does not excuse a Member State from drawing up the programmes required.
navnlig under hensyntagen til den tekniske udvikling og de økonomiske og miljømæssige forhold.
Artide 6 of the Directive provides that Member States shall draw up programmes in order to achieve the objectives.
Dernæst bemærkes, at selv om der i forhold til direktivets mål er opnået visse resultater inden udløbet af direktivets frist for gennemførelse af programmerne, fritager dette ikke en medlemsstat for at udarbejde programmerne.
The Commission took the view that it was clear from the reply from the Greek authorities that the establishment of the programmes was only at a preliminary stage, and it therefore resolved to bring the present action.
Selv om de franske myndigheder har truffet positive foranstaltninger i overensstemmelse med målene i direktivets artikel 6, stk. 1, udgør de kun en række regulerende indgreb og enkeltstående handlinger, som ikke har en sådan karakter af planlægning og strukturering med henblik på at nå målene, at de kan anses for at være programmer i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i artikel 6.
In order to achieve its objectives, Article 6 requires the Member States to draw up programmes and then to review and update them regularly.
De foranstaltninger, som den franske regering har påberåbt sig, opfylder ikke forpligtelsen til at udarbejde de i direktivets artikel 6 omhandlede programmer, eftersom den franske regering ikke har truffet bestemmelse om, at de skal kontrolleres og ajourføres regelmæssigt og der ikke er en præcis tidsplan for denne ajourføring, som skal finde sted mindst hvert fjerde år,
The measures implemented by the Hellenic Republic do not suffice to achieve the result prescribed by Article 6 of the Directive, namely the effective establishment of the programmes described therein. The study and the draft law relied upon by the Greek Government do no more than detail a number of programmes that may eventually be implemented.
*1) Den Franske Republik har ikke overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til artikel 6 i Rådets direktiv 91/157/EØF af 18. marts 1991 om batterier og akkumulatorer, der indeholder farlige stoffer, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har truffet alle de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendigefor at efterkomme denne artikel
Declares that, by failing to draw up within the prescribed period the programmes provided for in Article 6 of Council Directive 91/157/EEC of 18 March 1991 on batteries and accumulators containing certain dangerous substances, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that article;
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet fFemte Afdeling
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 29 April 1999.
»Traktatbrud — direktiv 91/157/EØF om batterier og akkumulatorer, der indeholder farlige stoffer — medlemsstatens manglende indførelse af de i direktivets artikel 6 omhandlede programmer* (Femte Afdeling)
'(1) declare that, by failing to establish and to communicate to the Commission the programmes provided for by Article 6 of Council Directive 91/157/EEC of 18 March 1991 on batteries and accumulators containing certain dangerous substances, Greece has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty;
besluttede den at anlægge den foreliggende sag.
(2) order Greece to pay the costs of these proceedings.'
Direktivets artikel 6 må for at nå målene med direktivet pålægge medlemsstaterne at udarbejde programmer og dernæst at kontrollere og ajourføre dem regelmæssigt.
Case C-49/92 Ρ Commission of the European Communities ν Anic Partecipazioni SpA Competition
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 10. juni 1998 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af artikel 226 EF (tidligere artikel 169) anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Hellenske Republik ikke har overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til EF-traktaten og Rådets direktiv 91/157/EØF, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har udarbejdet og givet meddelelse om de programmer, der er omhandlet i direktivets artikel 6.
(Appeal — Commission's Rules of Procedure — Procedure for the adoption of a decision by the College of Members of the Commission — Competition rules applicable to undertakings — Concepts of agreement and concerted practice — Responsibility of an undertaking for an infringement as a whole — Attachment of liability for the infringement — Fine) (Sixth Chamber)
De foranstaltninger, Den Hellenske Republik har truffet, er ikke tilstrækkelige til at nå det resultat, der er omhandlet i direktivets artikel 6, nemlig at de omhandlede programmer faktisk udarbejdes. Undersøgelsen og det lovforslag, den græske regering har påberåbt sig, opregner nemlig blot en række programmer, som er egnede til at iværksættes.
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 19 February 1992, the Commission of the European Communities brought an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 1991 in Case T-6/89 Enichem Anic ν Commission ('the contested judgment'), by which the Court of First Instance partially annulled Article 1 of Commission Decision 86/398/EEC of 23 April 1986 ('the Polypropylene Decision'), and set the amount of the fine imposed on the respondent at ECU 450 000, that is to say ITL 662 215 500.
»Formålet med dette direktiv er at gennemføre en indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om nyttiggørelse og kontrolleret bortskaffelse af brugte batterier og akkumulatorer, der indeholder farlige stoffer som anført i bilag I.«
Before 1977 the market for polypropylene was supplied by 10 producers, four of which (Montedison SpA ('Monte'), Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries pic ('ICI') and Shell International Chemical Company Ltd ('Shell') ('the big four') together accounted for 64% of the market.
I direktivets artikel 6 bestemmer, at medlemsstaterne udarbejder programmer med henblik på at gennemføre dets mål.
Following the expiry of the controlling patents held by Monte, new producers appeared on the market in 1977, bringing about a substantial increase in real production capacity which was not, however, matched by a corresponding increase in demand.
Da det efter Kommissionens opfattelse fremgik af de græske myndigheders svar, at de nævnte programmer kun var på et forberedende stadium,
This led to rates of utilisation of production capacity of between 60% in 1977 and 90% in 1983.
Desuden kan den græske regering ikke til sit forsvar gøre gældende, at den fortsat gør sig alle mulige anstrengelser for at iværksætte programmerne. Der stilles nemlig under en sag i henhold til artikel 226 EF alene krav om, at det objektivt fastslås, at en medlemsstat ikke har overholdt sin forpligtelse, og ikke om, at det bevises, at der på en eller anden måde fra vedkommende medlemsstats side er udvist langsommelighed eller uvilje.
Anic Partecipazioni SpA, formerly Anic SpA, then Enichem Anic SpA ('Anic'), requested the Court of Justice to set aside the contested judgment in whole or in part, to annul the Polypropylene Decision in whole or in part or to declare it non-existent, and subsequently to reduce the fine imposed on Anic by that Decision, which had already been reduced by the contested judgment, or to refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for that purpose.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Anic was one of the producers supplying the market in 1977.
»1) Den Hellenske Republik har ikke overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til artikel 6 i Rådets direktiv 91/157/EØF af 18. marts 1991 om batterier og akkumulatorer, der indeholder f årlige stoffer, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har udarbejdet de i denne artikel omhandlede programmer.
Its position on the polypropylene market was that of a medium-sized producer whose market share was between 2.7 and 4.2%.
Den Hellenske Republik betaler sagens omkostninger.*
It left the market in spring 1983, having transferred its polypropylene business to Monte at the end of October 1982.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling") den 29. april 1999.
Several undertakings active in the European petrochemical industry brought an action before the Court of First Instance for the annulment of the Polypropylene Decision.
Sag C-49/92 Ρ Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Anic Partecipazioni SpA Konkurrence
of 6 February 1962, the first regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty.
»Appel — Kommissionens forretningsorden — proceduren for vedtagelse af en beslutning i kommissærkollegiet—defor virksomhederne gældende konkurrenceregler—begrebet aftale og samordnet praksis — en virksomheds ansvar for hele overtrædelsen — den ansvarlige for overtrædelsen — bøde* (Sjette Afdeling)
At the end of that procedure, the Commission adopted the Polypropylene Decision, in which it found that Anic had infringed Article 81(1) EC by participating, with other undertakings, and in Anic's case from about November 1977 until a date in late 1982 or early 1983, in an agreement and concerted practice originating in mid-1977.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Anic was fined ECU 750 000, or ITL 1 103 692 500.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
On 31 July 1986, Anic lodged an action for annulment of that decision before the Court of Justice.
Sag C-51/92 Ρ Hercules Chemicals NV / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Konkurrence
In an appeal, the Court's jurisdiction is thus confined to examining the assessment by the Court of First Instance of the pleas argued before it.
»Appel — procedure — forpligtelse til at afsige domme i sager vedrørende samme beslutning samtidigt — Kommissionens forretningsorden — proceduren for vedtagelse af en beslutning i kommissærkollegiet — de for virksomhederne gældende konkurrenceregler — kontradiktion — aktindsigt — bøde* (Sjette Afdeling)
The Court of First Instance annulled Article 1 of the Polypropylene Decision in so far as it held that Anic had taken part: in the infringement before the end of 1978 or the beginning of 1979 and after the end of October 1982; in the system of regular meetings of polypropylene producers, the price initiatives and the restriction of monthly sales by reference to a previous period after mid-1982; and in measures designed to facilitate the implementation of the price initiatives.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
It follows that infringement of that article may result not only
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 15. juli 1997.
Since the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court of Justice will itself give final judgment in the matter.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Alleged non-existence of the Polypropylene Decision
Sag C-199/92 Ρ Hüls AG / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Konkurrence
No evidence casting doubt on the existence of the Polypropylene Decision has been adduced before the Court, so that there is no ground for it to examine this question of its own motion.
»Appel — Rettens procesreglement — genåbning af den mundtlige forhandling — Kommissionens forretningsorden — proceduren for vedtagelse af en beslutning i kommissærkollegiet — de for virksomhederne gældende konkurrenceregler—begrebet aftale og samordnet praksis — bevisregler og bevisprincipper — formodning for uskyldighed — bøde* (Sjette Afdeling)
The Commission rightly considered that Anic had participated in an agreement and concerted practice consisting of systems of regular meetings of polypropylene producers, price initiatives and measures designed to facilitate the implementation of the price initiatives, target tonnages and quotas between the end of 1978 or the beginning of 1979 and the end of October 1982.
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 15. juli 1997.
(2) dismiss, in its entirety, the cross-appeal by Enichem Anic SpA;
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
(3) order each party to bear its own costs.'
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 15. maj 1992 har Imperial Chemical Industries plc (herefter »ICI«) appelleret den dom, som den 10. marts 1992 blev afsagt af Retten i Første Instans i sagen ICI mod Kommissionen (sag T-13/89 Rev., herefter »den appellerede dom«).
(Appeal — Procedure — Obligation to deliver judgments in cases concerning the same decision at the same time — Rules of Procedure of the Commission — Procedure for the adoption of a decision by the College of Members of the Commission — Competition rules applicable to undertakings — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Fine) (Sixth Chamber)