natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I henhold til artikel 81, stk. 1, EF, er alle aftaler mellem virksomheder, som har til formål eller til følge at begrænse konkurrencen inden for fællesmarkedet, forbudt, såfremt de kan påvirke handelen mellem medlemsstater. Efter fast
It is settled case-law that, by its nature, a clause designed to prevent a buyer from reselling or exporting goods he has bought is liable to partition the markets and consequently to affect trade between Member States.
Det bemærkes, at det ikke er en betingelse for, at en overtrædelse af traktatens konkurrenceregler kan anses for forsætlig, at den pågældende virksomhed bevidst overtrådte et forbud efter disse regler, men at det er tilstrækkeligt, at den var klar over, at den anfægtede handlemåde havde til formål at begrænse konkurrencen.
In support of its action, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law as grounds for annulment.
Sagsøgeren har ikke kunnet være uvidende om, at den omtvistede bestemmelse i aftalen af 1982 havde til formål at begrænse parallelimport, og at den var i strid med selve formålet med gennemførelsen af det
The first alleges infringement of essential procedural requirements, in that the rights of the defence were not respected. The
Det fremgår af fast retspraksis, at bøden skal fastsættes på grundlag af omstændighederne i forbindelse med overtrædelsen og dennes grovhed, og at der ved vurderingen af overtrædelsens grovhed med henblik på bødeudmålingen bla. skal tages hensyn til konkurrencebegrænsningens art.
object of the offending clause in the 1982 agreement was to restrict parallel imports, and, as a result, by partitioning the various national markets, to thwart the very objective of realising the single market which the Treaty seeks to attain.
varighed findes i øvrigt ikke at være behæftet med fejl, idet overtrædelsen er beskrevet som parternes indgåelse af en aftale, hvori en bestemmelse havde et formål, der er i strid med artikel 81, stk. 1, EF.
It is settled case-law that the amount of the fine must be fixed at a level which takes account of the circumstances and the gravity of the infringement, the last-mentioned matter to be appraised by taking account of the nature of the restrictions on competition.
Selv om det antoges, at Retten ikke havde kunnet fastslå, at en sådan bestemmelse var blevet anvendt, står det dog fast, at bestemmelsen i sig selv kunne skabe et »optisk og psykologisk« klima, som bidrager til en opdeling af markedet.
The applicant's other objections to the Commission's finding of infringement of Article 81(1) are therefore inoperative, since, even if upheld, they cannot lead to the conclusion that an agreement having the object and scope of the one in point in that case does not infringe the Community competition rules.
Den overtrædelse, der tog sin begyndelse ved indgåelsen af aftalen af 1982, ophørte derfor først, da den omtvistede bestemmelse faktisk blev ophævet.
In the contested decision, the Commission was right in finding that the infringement was particularly serious, having regard, in particular, to the nature of the restriction on competition in question and BASFs strong position on the market for vehicle refinishing paints in Europe.
I den anfægtede beslutning har Kommissionen med føje fastslået, at den konstaterede overtrædelse var særligt grov, bla. under hensyntagen til konkurrencebegrænsningens art og den stærke stilling, BASF indtog på markedet for autoreparationslak i Europa.
Since the infringement found by the contested decision was the conclusion of, and participation by the parties in, an exclusive distribution agreement in which one of the clauses pursued an object contrary to Article 81(1) EC, the Commission was right in holding that that infringement did not end until the two parties removed the clause in question.
Det må fastslås, at når Kommissionen har fastsat den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren, til 10 000 ECU, findes den ikke at have overskredet grænserne for det skøn, den har i forbindelse med bødeudmålingen.
Even if the Court were unable to find that such a clause was implemented, the fact remains that its mere existence was capable of aeating a •visual and psychological' effect which contributed to a partitioning of the market.
Kommissionens vurdering af overtrædelsens
This Court finds that, in setting the fine on the applicant at ECU 10 000, the Commission did not exceed the bounds of the discretion which it enjoys in detennining the amount of fines.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The applicant cannot have been unaware that the
»1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
The Court held:
Sag T-203/95 Bernard Connolly / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case T-203/95 Bernard Connolly ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd - vedtægtens artikel 88 — suspension — lovlighed — begrundelse — påstået forseelse — krænkelse af vedtægtens artikel 11, 12 og 17 — ugebehandling« (Første Afdeling)
(Officials — Article 88 of the Staff Regulations — Suspension — Admissibility — Reasons — Alleged fault — Infringement of Articles 11, 12 and 17 of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment) (First Chamber)
Forenede sager T-34/96 og T-163/96 Bernard Connolly / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Joined Cases T-34/96 and T-163/96 Bernard Connolly ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — disciplinærsag — fjernelse fra tjenesten — vedtægtens artikel 11, 12 og 17 — ytringsfrihed — pligt til at udvise loyalitet og værdighed i tjenesten« (Første Afdeling)
(Officials — Disciplinaryprocedure — Removal from post —Articles 11,12 and 17 of the Staff Regulations — Freedom of expression - Duty of loyalty and dignity of the service) (First Chamber)
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Unavailable on the server
2) I sag T-163/96 frifindes Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
The application in Case T-163/96 is dismissed.
Sag T-214/96 Bernard Connolly / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten enestemandsvedtægten
Case T-214/96 Bernard Connolly ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
»Tjenestemænd — vedtægtens artikel 90, stk 1 — erstatningssøgsmål — administrativprocedure ikke i overensstemmelse med vedtægten — afvisning« (Første Afdeling)
(Officiah —Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations —Actionfor compensation — Pre-litigation procedure complying with the Staff Regulations — Inadmissibility) (First Chamber)
Sag T-220/97 Η. & R. Ecroyd Holdings Ltd / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug 20. maj 1999
In 1984 it became apparent that additional measures were necessary in order to restore a balance in the milk sector.
»Mælk — referencemængde — opfyldelse af en dom afsagt af Domstolen« (Fjerde Afdeling)
Following various judgments, and in particular the judgment in Case C-314/89 Rauh ν Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth [1991] ECR 1-1647,
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
the abovementioned drcumstances, nor does it have the power to do so.'
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Between 1980 and 1984 the partners in Credenhill Farming changed on several occasions.
»1) Kommissionens beslutning af 16 maj 1997, hvorved den afslog at træffe foranstaltninger til opfyldelse af Domstolens dom af 6. juni 1996, sag C-127/94, Ecroyd, annulleres.
By judgment of 6 June 1996 in Case C-127/94 R ν MAFF ex pane Ecroyd [1996] ECR 1-2731 ('the judgment in Ecroyd'), the Court of Justice held, on a reference by the High Court of Justice, as regards the applications for quota submitted by Ecroyd Limited:
Kommissionen bærer sine egne sagsomkostninger og betaler sagsøgerens omkostninger.
The competent national authority had no duty, following the [judgment in Wehrs], to award a provisional special reference quantity to producers finding themselves in the abovementioned circumstances, nor did it have the power to do so.
Nordirland bærer sine egne
The Commission applicant;
Det Forenede Kongerige sagsomkostninger.« «
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is ordered to bear its own costs.'
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenumi den 18. maj 1999.
Advocate General G. Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 18 May 1999.
Præjudiciel — Tribunal de première instance de Namur —fortolkning af EF­traktatens artikel59­66, 85 og 86 — regler fastsat af et internationalt sportsforbund, hvorefter en sportsudøver skal have tilladelse fra eller være blevet udtaget af det nationale forbund for at kunne deltage i en international turnering — amatørsportsudøver, som aspirerer til at blive professionel eller halvprofessionel — kvindejudo
Decisions which a Member State takes for the purposes of combat effeaiveness during peace time and/or in preparation for war in relation to the conditions of employment in its armed forces or in a selea corps such as that described in the
Sag C-269/97 Kommissionen for De Fællesskaber / Rådet Europæiske Union
order for reference do not fall outside the scope of the Community legal system.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet fDomstolens plenum1) den
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 18 May 1999.
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. maj 1999.
Article 224 of the Treaty does not permit exclusion from the ambit of Coundl Directive 76/207/EEC of discrimination on grounds of sex in relation to the conditions of employment in the armed forces or in a select corps such as that described in the order for reference, during peace time and/or in preparation for war, for the purpose of ensuring combat effectiveness.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 18. mai 1999.
The policy adopted by a Member State of excluding women, during peace time and/or in preparation for war, from service in a corps such as that described in the order for reference comes within the scope of the derogation provided for under Article 2(2) of Council Direaive 76/207/EEC.
Præjudiciel — Tribunal du travail de Mons — fortolkning af artikel 46b i forordning nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af 2. juni 1983 -ydelser af samme art, der udbetales i henhold til lovgivningen i to eller flere medlemsstater — national lovgivning, hvorefter tildelingen af fiktive perioder (for årene 1938 til 1945) er begrænset til de perioder, med hensyn til hvilke vedkommende ikke har ret til ydelser i henhold til en anden ordning (herunder en udenlandsk ordning)
Preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Travail, Mons — Interpretation of Article 46b of Regulation No 1408/71 (inserted by Council Regulation No 1248/92) — Benefits of the same kind payable under the laws of two or more Member States — National legislation limiting the attribution of notional periods for the years 1938 to 1945 to the periods for which the person concerned has no entitlement under another scheme, including a foreign scheme
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. maj 1999.
In considering whether the grounds on which the Member State has based itself in applying that policy justify application of Article 2(2) of Council Directive 76/207/EEC, it is for the national court or tribunal to determine whether the measure in question complies with the principle of proportionality.'
Sag C-179/98 Kongeriget Belgien / Fatna Mesbah
ex parte: Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Ltd and May & Baker Ltd Case C-179/98 Kingdom of Belgium ν Fatna Mesbah
Sag C-94/98 The Queen / The Licensing Authority established by the Medicines Act 1968, ex parte: Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Ltd og May & Baker Ltd Præjudiciel — Cour du travail de Bruxelles — fortolkning af samarbejdsaftalen EØF/Marokko (godkendt ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2211/78 af 26.9.1978) - anvendelsesområde -begrebet »marokkanske arbejdstagere«- — marokkansk arbejdstager, der har erhvervet statsborgerskab i en medlemsstat — begrebet »familiemedlem* — svigermor, der bor hos sin svigersøns familie
Preliminary ruling - Cour du Travail, Bruxelles — Interpretation of the EEC-Morocco Cooperation Agreement approved by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2211/78 of 26 September 1978 - Scope -Meaning of Moroccan worker — Moroccan worker having acquired the nationality of a Member State — Meaning of family member — Mother-in-law residing with the family of her son-in-law
Præjudiciel—High Court of Justice ((¿úeen 's Bench Division) — fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 65/65/EØF af 26. januar 1965 om tilnærmelse af lovgivningen om medicinske specialiteter — parallelimport af lægemidler — betingelser for udstedelse af en tilladelse til at sælge et produkt markedsført i en anden medlemsstat — produkt, hvis tilladelse til markedsføring i importstaten ikke længere er gyldig
Preliminary ruling—High Cowrt of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) — Interpretation of Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medicinal products (OJ, English Special Edition 1965-1966, p. 20) - Parallel imports of pharmaceuticalproducts — Conditions for the grant of marketing authorisation for a product marketed in another Member State — Product for which marketing authorisation in the country of importation has ceased to have effect
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 18. maj 1999.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered bis Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 18 May 1999.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 19. maj 1999.
Advocate General A La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 19 May 1999.
Præjudiciel — LandgerichtDüsseldorf—fortolkning af fællesskabsretten — staters og eventuelt offentligretlige organers erstatningsansvar for skader, der er forvoldt ved overtrædelse af
'Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 and 30 EC, respeaively) must be interpreted as meaning that any person proposing to import from Member State A into Member State Β a medicinal product X, which uses the same active ingredient and has the same therapeutic effects but is manufactured according to a different formulation from that of a medidnal produa Y, which is covered by a marketing authorisation in Member State B, is required to apply for and obtain a marketing authorisation from the competent authorities of Member State Β in accordance with and for the purposes of Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medidnal products, as amended, where:
Præjudiciel — Consiglio di Stato — lovligheden efter traktatens bestemmelser om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser af en national lov, hvorefter der ikke
(i) medicinal product X is the subject of an MA granted in Member State A but not an MA granted in Member State B,
Sag C-151/98 Ρ Pharos SA / Kommissionen Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-67/98 Questore di Verona ν Diego Zenatti the marketing authorisations mentioned under (i) and (ii) above were granted to different members of the same group of companies and the manufacturers of the medicinal products X and Y are also members of that group of compames,
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 20. maj 1999.
Advocate General N. Fennelly delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 20 May 1999.
Appel af dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Tredje Afdeling) den 17. februar 1998 i sag Τ­Ι05'196, Pharos SA mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber, hvori Retten fondt, 1) at det var ufornødent at træffe afgørelse vedrørende påstanden om retsstridig passivitet, og 2) at Kommissionen skulle frifindes for sagsøgerens erstatningspåstand — påstået forsinket opførelse af »somatosalm« på listen over de stoffer, der ikke er undergivet en maksimalgrænseværdi for restkoncentrationer af veterinærmedicinske præparater i animalske levnedsmidler — Rådets forordning nr. 2377/90
Preliminary ruling — Tribunal Círculo do Porto — Interpretation of Community law — Misappropriation of funds granted by the European SocialFund — Competence of Member States to lay down criminal sanctions not provided for by Community law in the event of incorrect use of Community funds
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 20. mai 1999.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 20 May 1999.
Præjudiciel — Tribunal do Círculo do Porto — fortolkning af fællesskabsretten — urigtig anvendelse af fællesskabsmidler fra Den Europæiske Socialfond — medlemsstaternes kompetence til at foreskrive straf, som ikke er foreskrevet i fællesskabsretten, for urigtig anvendelse af fællesskabsmidler
In the absence of Community harmonisation of national requirements for the pladng of parallel imports of medidnal products on the market, it is incumbent on the authority responsible for issuing marketing authorisations, and if appropriate the national courts, to determine whether the reasons for which the formulation of medidnal produa Y was developed and introduced can be linked with the general interest in protecting human life and health, as that concept is understood in national law.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 20. maj 1999.
of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin (Council Regulation No 2377/90)
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
He proposed that the Court should dismiss the appeal and order Pharos SA to pay the costs.
Sag C-45/97 Kongeriget Spanien / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-45/97 Kingdom of Spain ν Commission of the European Communities
Sag C-354/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
Case C-354/98 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic
Delvis annullation af beslutning 96/701/EF af 20. november 1996 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1992, der finansieres af EUGFL, Garantisektionen, samt visse udgifter for regnskabsåret 1993 — forbrugsstøtte til olivenolie (Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3089/78 af 19.12.1978 og Kommissionens forordning nr. 2677/85 af 24.9.1985)
Partial annulment of Commission Decision 96/701/EC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1992 of the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF and in respect of certain expenditure for 1993 — consumption aid for olive oil (Council Regulation No 3089/78 and Commission Regulation No 2677/85)
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Rådets direktiv 96/97/EF af 20. december 1996 om gennemførelse af princippet om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder inden for de erhvervstilknyttede sociale sikringsordninger
Failure by a State to comply with its obligations — Failure to transpose within the prescribed timelimits Council Directive 96/97/EC amending Directive 86/378/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 20. mai 1999.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 20 May 1999.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 20. maj 1999.
Advocate General A. La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 20 May 1999.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
He proposed that the Court should dismiss the application and order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.
Præjudiciel — Supremo tribunal administrativo — fortolkning af artikel 4, stk 3, samt artikel 10 og 12 i Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF om kapitaltilførselsafgifter — notargebyrer, der ikke står i forhold til den ydelse, notaren har præsteret i forbindelse med ændring af et sehkabs vedtægter eller forøgelse af kapitalen
Preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 73b and 73d of the EC Treaty and Articles 1 and 4 of Council Directive 88/361/EEC of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty (OJ 1988 L 178, p. 5)—National legislation concerning stamp duties—Liability to duty on loan agreements — Discdminarìon in relation to loan agreements concluded abroad — Different chargeable events, namely the drawing up of a document in writing
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 20. maj 1999.
Advocate General G. Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 20 Mav 1999.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 20. maj 1999.
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 20 May 1999.
Præjudiciel — Nederlandenes Hoge Raad — fortolkning af artikel 4, stk 1, i direktiv 77/388/EØF: Rådets sjette direktiv af 17. maj 1977 om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgift — Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag — begrebet »selvstændig økonomisk virksomhedt — selskabstager, der udlejer en fast ejendom til selskabet, et nederlandsk »maatschap« (civilt selskab), som ikke eren selvstændig juridisk person
Preliminary ruling — Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Interpretation of Article 4(3), 10 and 12 of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Notarial fees disproportionate to the service provided by the notary in the context of amendments to the articles of association of a company or to an increase in the capital
Sag C-33/97 Colim NV / Bigg's Continent Noord NV Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Case C-33/97 Colim NV v Bigg's Continent Noord NV Approximation of laws
Sag C-319/97 Antoine Kortas Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Case C-319/97 Antoine Kortas Approximation of laws
Forenede sager T-114/98 og T-115/98 ....
Joined Cases T-114/98 and T-115/98 Doleres Rodriquez Perez and Others v Commission of the European Communities José Maria Olivares Ramos and Others v Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
17 Doleres Rodriquez Perez m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber José Maria Olivares Ramos m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case C-417/97 10 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg Freedom to provide services
Sag C-417/97 10 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg Fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser
Case T-17/96 17 Télévision française 1 SA (TFl) v Commission of the European Communities Competition
Sag C-74/98 DAT-SCHAUB amba / Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri
Case C-218/98 Oumar Dabo Abdoulaye and Others v Régie nationale des usines Renault SA
Præjudiciel »Konkurrence — voldgiftsrets anvendelse ex officio af artikel 81 EF (tidligere artikel 85 — en national rets kompetence til at ophceve voldgiftskendelser« (Domstolens plenum) voldgift i overensstemmelse med statutten for Det Nederlandske Voldgiftsinstitut, og at voldgiftsretten skal anvende nederlandsk ret.
Preliminary ruling (Competition — Application by an arbitration tribunal, of its own motion, of Article 81 EC (ex Article 85) — Power of national courts to annul arbitration awards) (Full Court)
Ved kendelse afsagt den 21. marts 1997 har Nederlandenes Hoge Raad i medfør af artikel 234 EF (tidligere artikel 177) forelagt Domstolen fem præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 81 EF (tidligere artikel 85).
The licensing agreement provides that all disputes or differences arising between the parties are to be settled by arbitration in conformity with the rules of the Netherlands Institute of Arbitrators and that the arbitrators appointed are to apply Netherlands law.