natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Præjudiciel »Præjudiciel — Pretura circondariale di Trevho, sezione dbtaccata di Conegliano — gyldigheden af vbse forordninger inden for vinsektoren —produktionsåret 1993/1994 — den procentdel af produktionen af bordvin, der skal leveres til obligatorisk destillation· (Femte Afdeling)
In that regard, it is apparent from Article 39(3) of Regulation No 822/87 that, when determining the volume of table wine to be distilled in respect of each Member State, account is not taken of the surface areas from which the wine originates, but only of that State's volume of production, which is ascertained on the basis of the harvest declarations in particular.
Generaladvokat G. Cosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 28. maj 1998.
By its fourth question, the referring court asks whether Article 39(4) of Regulation No 822/87, under which the quantities for distillation are to be apportioned among the various producers in a region on the basis of yield per hectare, is not invalid because it contravenes the principle of proportionality.
»Den ovenfor foretagne gennemgang har intet frembragt, der kan rejse tvivl om gyldigheden af artikel 1, stk. 3, fjerde led, i Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 343/94af 15. februar 1994 om iværksættelse af obligatorisk destillation som omhandlet i artikel 39 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 822/87 og om undtagelse fra visse bestemmelser om destillationens gennemførelse for produktionsåret 1993/94 artikel 1, stk. 1, litra c), og artikel 1, stk. 2, andet afsnit (sammenholdt med bilaget for så vidt angår region 4), i Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 465/94 af 1. marts 1994 om fastsættelse for produktionsåret 1993/94 af, hvor stor en procentdel af produktionen af bordvin, der skal leveres til obligatorisk destillation efter artikel 39 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 822/87 for områderne 3 og 6, som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 610/94 af 18. marts 1994 artikel 39, stk. 4, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 822/87 af 16. marts 1987 om den fælles markedsordning for vin artikel 4, stk. 2, fjerde led, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 441/88 af 17. februar 1988 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for obligatorisk destillation som omhandlet i artikel 39 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 822/87
It is to be remembered that the principle of proportionality, which is one of the general principles of Community law, requires that measures adopted by Community institutions do not exceed the limits of what is appropriate and necessary in order to attain the objectives legitimately pursued by the legislation in question; when there is a choice between several appropriate measures recourse must be had to the least onerous, and the disadvantages caused must not be disproportionate to the aims pursued.
artikel 1, stk. 1, i Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 3151/94 af 21. december 1994 om en senere undtagelsesbestemmelse for produktionsåret 1993/94 om producenters levering af bordvin til obligatorisk destillation.«
In that regard, it is clear from the order for reference that the Ministry imposed a penalty on Mr Zaninotto for the non-distillation of the quantities to be delivered by him during the 1993/94 wine year.
Sag Cl 14/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Kongeriget Spanien Fri bevægelighed for personer
That measure therefore cannot be regarded as disproportionate in relation to the objective pursued which is to absorb surpluses of table wine on the market.
29. oktober 1998 fri udveksling af
The validity of the provision in issue thus manifestly has no bearing on the outcome of the main proceedings.
På den anden sige følger det af sagens akter, at vagtselskabers og privat vagtpersonales virksomhed ikke er direkte og særligt forbundet med udøvelse af offentlig myndighed. Undtagelsen i traktatens artikel 55, stk. 1 — i givet fald sammenholdt med artikel 66 — finder da ikke anvendelse i den foreliggende sag.
In accordance with settled case-law, it must be held that the questions referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling do not involve an interpretation of Community law objectively required for the decision to be taken by the national tribunal.
Det bemærkes ligeledes, at den nationalitetsbetingelse, som efter lovens artikel 7 og 10 er pålagt vagtselskaber og vagtpersonale, udelukker, at en person eller et selskab, som er statsborger eller har hjemsted i en anden medlemsstat, kan udøve privat vagtvirksomhed.
By its fifth question, the referring court calls into question the decision of the Commission to equate the territories of the Member States with the wine-growing regions in the Community, in particular to equate Italy with wine-growing zone C.
Det bemærkes, at lovens artikel 7, 8 og 10 medfører begrænsninger i etableringsfriheden, den fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser og arbejdskraftens fri bevægelighed.
Accordingly, the Court lacks jurisdiction answer the sixth and seventh questions.
En sådan generel udelukkelse fra adgang til visse former for erhvervsvirksomhed kan ikke retfærdiggøres af hensynet til den offentlige orden, den offentlige sikkerhed og den offentlige sundhed efter traktatens artikel 48, stk. 3, og artikel 56.
The applicant in the main proceedings argues that, since Italy's national territory is made up of areas which obviously differ widely both from a geographical and from an oenological point of view, the Commission, which did not take account of those realities, exceeded the limits of its discretion.
Det må imidlertid undersøges, om disse hindringer er begrundet i henhold til de undtagelser, der er fastsat i traktaten.
In that regard, it must be held that in an entity composed of Member States, such as the European Community, it is clearly reasonable to take the territory of those Member States as a point of reference for administrative purposes.
Endelig fastslås, at reglen om, at medlemmer af bestyrelsen og direktionen i alle vagtselskaber skal have bopæl i Spanien, udgør en hindring for etableringsfriheden og den fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser.
Even though geographical and economic conditions may not be identical in the various parts of national territory, the Commission was therefore entitled, in the exercise of its discretion, to regard the whole of the territory of a Member State as a single region, provided that such a decision was not manifestly unsuited to the structures of the Member State in question.
Med hensyn til traktatens artikel 48, stk. 4, bemærkes, at private vagtselskaber ikke er en del af den offentlige administration, og at denne bestemmelse derfor ikke finder anvendelse i den foreliggende sag.
By its sixth and seventh questions, the referring court asks whether Article 1(1) of Regulation No 3151/94, which extended to 29 January 1995 the timelimit for delivering table wine to a distillery in respect of the 1993/94 wine year, is valid.
omfattet af undtagelsen i artikel 56, stk. 1, i givet fald sammenholdt med traktatens artikel 66.
Articles 48(3), 56(1) and 66 of the Treaty
Men denne betingelse er ikke nødvendig for at varetage den offentlige sikkerhed i den pågældende medlemsstat, og er derfor ikke
This condition is not necessary in order to ensure public security in the Member State concerned and is not therefore covered by the derogation provided for by Article 56(1) combined, where appropriate, with Article 66 of the Treaty.
Kongeriget Spanien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EF-traktatens artikel 48, 52 og 59 ved at opretholde artikel 7, 8 og 10 i lov nr. 23/1992 af 30. juli 1992, idet meddelelse af autorisation for et vagtselskab til at udøve privat vagtvirksomhed er gjort betinget af, at selskabet har hjemsted i Spanien, og at medlemmerne af dets bestyrelse og direktion har bopæl i Spanien, samt at vagtpersonalet har spansk statsborgerskab.
Declares that, by maintaining in force Articles 7, 8 and 10 of Law No 23/1992 of 30 July 1992, in so far as those provisions make the grant of authorisation to carry on private security activities, in the case of security companies, subject to the requirement of being constituted in Spain and the requirement that their directors and managers should reside in Spain and the requirement that security staff should possess Spanish nationality, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 48, 52 and 59 of the EC Treaty;
Kongeriget Spanien betaler sagens omkostninger.
Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.'
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 7. maj 1998.
Advocate General S. Alber delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 7 May 1998.
»1) Kongeriget Spanien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter traktaten, navnlig artikel 48, 52 og 59, ved at opretholde artikel 7, 8 og 10 i lov nr. 23/1992 af 30. juli 1992, hvorved meddelelse af autorisation for et vagtselskab til at udøve privat vagtvirksomhed er gjort betinget af, at selskabet har hjemsted i Spanien, og at medlemmerne af dets bestyrelse og direktion har bopæl i Spanien, samt at de personer, som udfører vagtvirksomheden, har spansk statsborgerskab.
Declare that, in so far as Articles 7, 8 and 10 of Law No 23/1992 of 30 July 1992 make the grant of authorisation to carry on private security activities in the case of 'security companies' subject to the requirement of being constituted in Spain, the requirement that their directors and managers should reside in Spain and the requirement that the 'security staff should possess Spanish nationality, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 48, 52 and 59.
Kongeriget Spanien betaler sagens omkostninger.«
Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.
Præjudiciel »Etableringsfrihed — direktiv 64/427/EØF — selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed indenfor de beog forarbejdende erhverv — betingeber for adgang til erhvervet· (Femte Afdeling)
Preliminary ruling (Freedom of establishment — Directive 64/427¡EEC —Activities of selfemployed persons in manufacturing and processing industries — Conditions for taking up an occupation) (Fifth Chamber) formal evidence attesting that applicants possess such knowledge and ability.
Ved to afgørelser af 7. maj 1998 har Tribunal administratif forelagt tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EF-traktatens artikel 52 og artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 64/427/EØF af 7. juli 1964 (herefter »direktivet«).
By two judgments of 7 May 1997 the Tribunal Administratif (Administrative Court), Luxembourg, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 52 of the EC Treaty and Article 3 of Council Directive 64/427/EEC of 7 July 1964 (hereinafter 'the Directive').
deres kompetence på dette område under iagttagelse af såvel de fundamentale rettigheder, som er sikret ved EF-traktatens artikel 52 og 59, som den effektive virkning af direktivbestemmelser indeholdende overgangsforanstaltninger.
Moreover, the Member States must none the less, when exercising their powers in this area, respect both the basic freedoms guaranteed by Articles 52 and 59 of the EC Treaty and the effectiveness of a directive laying down transitional measures.
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst i forbindelse med to sager anlagt af henholdsvis Manuel de Castro Freitas og Raymond Escallier til prøvelse af to afgørelser fra ministre des Classes moyennes et du Tourisme (ministeren for små og mellemstore virksomheder samt turisme), der afviste at tildele dem de etableringstilladelser, som de havde anmodet om for at udøve forskellige erhverv i Luxembourg.
Those questions arose in the context of two actions brought, by Mr de Castro Freitas and Mr Escallier respectively, against two decisions of the Ministre des Classes Moyennes et du Tourisme (Minister for Small and Medium-sized Businesses and the Self-employed, and for Tourism refusing to grant them the licences for which they had applied in order to carry on a number of trades in Luxembourg.
Det bestemmes i direktivets artikel 3, stk. 1, at såfremt en medlemsstat gør adgangen til eller udøvelsen af en af de former for erhvervsvirksomhed, som er omfattet af direktivet, afhængig af besiddelsen af bestemte kvalifikationer, »anerkender vedkommende medlemsstat som tilstrækkeligt bevis for disse kvalifikationer og færdigheder den faktiske udøvelse af den pågældende erhvervsvirksomhed i en anden medlemsstat«.
The first paragraph of Article 3(1) of the Directive provides that where, in a Member State, the taking up or pursuit of any activity covered by the Directive is dependent on the possession of specific qualifications, 'that Member State shall accept as sufficient evidence of such knowledge and ability the fact that the activity in question has been pursued in another Member State'.
Ifølge direktivets artikel 4, stk. 3, meddeler værtslandet efter ansøgning tilladelse til at udøve en faglig virksomhed, såfremt den virksomhed, der er attesteret af de kompetente myndigheder i værtslandet, svarer til de væsentlige punkter i den forud af værtslandet meddelte erhvervsbeskrivelse, og eventuelle særlige, i værtslandets lovgivning foreskrevne, betingelser er opfyldt.
In accordance with Article 4(3) of the Directive, the host Member State is to grant authorisation to pursue an occupational activity on application by the person concerned where the activity certified by the competent authority of the Member State of origin conforms to the main features of the description of the activity, as previously communicated by the host Member State, and where any other requirements laid down by the rules of that State are satisfied.
Med disse spørgsmål, som det er hensigtsmæssigt at undersøge samlet, ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om direktivets artikel 3 skal fortolkes således, at såfremt en medlemsstat gør adgangen til og udøvelsen af selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed inden for be- og forarbejdning under industri og håndværk afhængig af besiddelsen af bestemte kvalifikationer og færdigheder, kan medlemsstaten kræve, at en EF-statsborger, som ansøger om tilladelse til på medlemsstatens område at udøve flere former for erhvervsvirksomhed, hvis udøvelse er attesteret af de kompetente myndigheder i det tidligere opholdsland, har gennemført de perioder for faktisk udøvelse af virksomhed, som er fastsat i denne artikel, særskilt for hvert fag, hvis virkeområde er fastlagt i værtslandets lovgivning.
By those questions, which should be considered together, the national court is asking in substance whether on a proper construction of Article 3 of the Directive, where, in a Member State, the possession of specific knowledge and ability is a condition for taking up and pursuing an activity as a selfemployed person in a manufacturing or processing industry or small craft industry, that Member State may require of a Community national who applies for licences to pursue occupational activities in that Member State which he is certified by the competent authorities of his Member State of origin to have pursued there, that he have completed separately, in respect of each of the trades whose scope is defined by the legislation of the host State, the periods prescribed by that article.
Værtslandet er bundet af de oplysninger, som er indeholdt i den af det tidligere opholdsland udstedte attestation, samt i givet fald af alle udbedte, supplerende oplysninger.
The Court has already held that the competent authority of the Member State of origin must certify whether the applicant's pursuit of the activity in question was genuine and real and took place over a given number of consecutive years, that is to say, without any interruption other than those occurring in the ordinary course of life.
I mangel af en sådan harmonisering af betingelserne for ret til udøvelse af disse aktiviteter har medlemsstaterne således i princippet stadig kompetence til at fastlægge de almindelige, forretningsmæssige eller faglige kvalifikationer og færdigheder, som er nødvendige for udøvelsen af de pågældende erhverv, og de kan kræve, at der fremlægges et eksamensbevis, certifikat eller andet kvalifikationsbevis som dokumentation for, at de pågældende besidder disse kvalifikationer og færdigheder.
The host Member State is bound by the declarations contained in the certificate issued by the Member State of origin and by any additional information requested.
Værtslandet kan således hverken fastlægge adgangsbetingelserne for de håndværksmæssige erhverv eller virkeområder for disse erhverv på en sådan måde, at den af de kompetente myndigheder i det tidligere opholdsland udstedte attestation mister sin virkning med hensyn til at gøre det muligt for den pågældende i værtslandet at udøve det erhverv, som denne attestation omhandler.
Failing harmonisation of the conditions for access to the activities in question, the Member States remain, in principle, competent to define the general, commercial or professional knowledge and ability necessary in order to engage in the activities in question and to require production of diplomas, certificates or other
»Artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 64/427/EØF af 7. juli 1964 om de nærmere overgangsforanstaltninger for selvstændig virksomhed inden for de be- og forarbejdende erhverv under Cm-hovedgrupperne 23-40 (industri og håndværk) skal fortolkes således, at såfremt en medlemsstat gør adgangen til og udøvelsen af selvstændig virksomhed inden for de be- og forarbejdende erhverv under industri og håndværk afhængig af besiddelsen af bestemte kvalifikationer og færdigheder, kan medlemsstaten ikke kræve, at en EF-statsborger, som ansøger om tiUadebe til på medlemsstatens område at udøve flere former for erhvervsvirksomhed, hvis udøvelse er attesteret af de kompetente myndigheder i det tidligere opholdsland, har gennemført de perioder for faktisk udøvelse af virksomhed, som er fastsat i denne artikel, særskat for hvertfag hvb virkeområde er fastlagt i værtslandets lovgivning.·
'On a proper construction of Article 3 of Council Directive 64/427/EEC of 7 July 1964 laying down detailed provisions concerning transitional measures in respect of activities of selfemployed persons in manufacturing and processing industries falling within ISIC Major Groups 23-40 (Industry and small craft industries), where, in a Member State, the possession of specific knowledge and ability is a condition for taking up and pursuing an activity as a selfemployed person in a manufacturing or processing industry or small craft industry, that Member State may not require of a Community national who applies for licences to pursue occupational activities in that Member State which he is certified by the competent authorities of his Member State of origin to have pursued there, that he have completed separately, in respect of each of the trades whose scope is defined by the legislation of the host State, the periods prescribed by that article.'
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 5. marts 1998.
Advocate General P. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 5 March 1998.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
He proposed that the Court of Justice reformulate the questions referred and answer them as follows:
»Traktatens artikel 52 samt artikel 3 og 4 i Rådets direktiv 64/427/EØF af 7. juli 1964 om de nærmere overgangsforanstaltninger for selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed inden for de be- og forarbejdende erhverv under CITI-hovedgrupperne 23-40 (industri og håndværk) indebærer, at en EF-statsborger, som for værtsmedlemsstatens myndigheder fremlægger en attest, hvorved den kompetente myndighed i oprindelsesmedlemsstaten bekræfter, at den pågældende har udøvet forskellige erhverv samtidig inden for den periode, som kræves for hans vedkommende, og udøvelsen af disse erhverv ikke er ophørt for mere end ti år siden, ikke kan nægtes tilladelse til at udøve en del af disse erhverv med den begrundelse, at de i værtsmedlemsstaten anses for selvstændige hovederhverv, og at myndighederne i denne medlemsstat finder, at betingelserne for deres udøvelse inden for en vis rimelig periode skal være opfyldt særskilt for hver af de pågældende erhverv.«
'It is contrary to Article 52 of the Treaty and Articles 3 and 4 of Council Directive 64/427 EEC of 7 July 1964 laying down detailed provisions concerning transitional measures in respect of activities of selfemployed persons in manufacturing and processing industries falling within ISIC Major Groups 23-40 (Industry and small craft industries) for a Community national who provides to the authorities of the host Member State of origin, evidence that he has simultaneously pursued more than one trade for the reasonable period laid down for his situation, and that he did not cease pursuing those trades more than ten years earlier, to be refused a licence to pursue part of those trades on the ground that, in the host Member State, they are regarded as principal and separate trades, and the authorities of that Member State consider that the condition requiring the activity to have been pursued for a reasonable period must be satisfied separately in respect of each trade.'
Retten
Page 36
Sag T-13/96 TEAM Sri / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Forbindelserne udadtil
Case T-13/96 TEAM Sri ν Commission of the European Communities External relations
»Dansk tetà foreligger endnu ikke. ·
The shortlist of undertakings invited to submit tenders included the applicant, but not Kolprojekt.
(Fjerde Afdeling)
Procedure and forms of order sought
FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
It follows that the claim for damages is admissible.
Sag C-342/97 Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH / Klijsen Handel B.V. december 1992 om en procedure i henhold til EØF-traktatens artikel 85 (IV/32.448 og IV/32.450: Cewal, Cowac, Ukwal) og EØF-traktatens artikel 86 (IV/32.448 og IV/32.450: Cewal)
The applicant maintains that, having issued an invitation to tender and ensured that the tendering procedure followed its normal course almost until its completion, the Commission changed its mind without warning and adopted measures wholly lacking in any objective justification or consistency.
Generaladvokat N. Fennelly fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Femte Afdeling) den 29. oktober 1998.
Moreover, the damage must be a sufficiently direct consequence of the conduct complained of (Perillo ν Commission).
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The applicant has not
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The fact that a mark has no descriptive elements may be a factor in assessing the distinctiveness of a mark but does not itself increase the likelihood of confusion.
Præjudiciel — Tribunale civile epenale di Firenze — fortolkning af artikel 2 i direktiv 89/646/EØF: Rådets andet direktiv af 15. december 1989 om samordning af lovgivningen om adgang til at optage og udøve virksomhed som kreditinstitut og om ændring af direktiv 77/780/EØF — begrebet »tilbagebetalingspligtige midler*
Preliminary ruling — Landgericht München I — Interpretation of Article 5(l)(b) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) — Likelihood of confusion of monosyllabic words consisting of identical or similar phonetic elements arranged in the same order — Concept of recognition of a mark
Forenede sager C-395/96 Ρ og C-396/96 Ρ Compagnie Maritime Belge SA og Dafra-Lines A/S / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Joined Cases C-395/96 Ρ and C-396/96 Ρ Compagnie Maritime Belge SA and Dafra-Lines A/S ν Commission of the European Communities
Generaladvokat N. Fennelly fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 29. oktober 1998.
Advocate General N. Fennelly delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 29 October 1998.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
He recommended that the Court:
Appel af Rettens dom af 8. oktober 1996 i de forenede sager T-24/93, T-25/93, T-26/93 og T28/93 ­ frifindelse for en påstand om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 93/82/EØF af 23.
annul Articles 6 and 7 of Commission Decision 93/82/EEC of 23 December 1992 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 85 (IV/32.448 and IV/32.450: Cewal, Cowac and Ukwal) and 86 (IV/32.448 and IV/32.450: Cewal) of the EEC Treaty in so far as those Articles concern the appellants;