natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Selv om det ikke kan udelukkes, at statens tildeling af midler til en offentlig institution som IRI kan udgøre en statsstøtte i traktatens artikel 92's forstand, har Kommissionen dog ikke, som den har gjort gældende, efter afslutningen af den i traktaten fastlagte procedure, i beslutningen fastslået, at den finansiering, staten stillede til rådighed for IRI, også udgør en støtte, der er uforenelig med fællesmarkedet.
However, while it cannot be ruled out that the allocation of funds by the State to a public body such as IRI may constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the Treaty, the Commission, contrary to its submissions, did not find in the decision, on completion of the procedure laid down in the Treaty, that the fact that funds were made available by the State to IRI also constitutes aid incompatible with the common market.
Den Italienske Republik har undladt at opfylde de forpligteber, der påhviler den i henhold til Kommissionens beslutning 89/661/EØFaf 31. maj 1989 om den italienske regerings støtte til bilproducenten Alfa Romeo (motorkøretøjssektoren), idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har ophævet og foranstaltet tilbagebetaling af den ydede støtte på i aü 615,1 mia. LIT med tillæg af morarenter fra den 30. september 1989, indtil betaling sker.
Declared that, by failing to abolish and recover within the prescribed period the aid improperly paid to the Alfa Romeo Group in the amount of LIT 615.1 thousand million plus default interest calculated from 30 September 1989 to the date of payment of the amount in question, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Commission Decision 89/661/EEC of 31 May 1989 concerning aid provided by the Italian Government to Alfa Romeo, an undertaking in the motor vehicle sector,
Efter hans opfattelse bør Domstolen :
He considered that the Court should:
»1) fastslå, at Den Italienske Republik ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har gennemført Kommissionens beslutning 89/661/EØF af 31. maj 1989 om den italienske regerings støtte til producenten Alfa Romeo (motorkørctøjssektoren) og således ikke har overholdt sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-traktaten.
'(1) declare that, by failing to implement within the prescribed period Commission Decision 89/661/EEC of 31 May 1989 concerning aid provided by the Italian Government to Alfa Romeo, an undertaking in the motor vehicle sector, the Republic of Italy has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
2) pålægge Den Italienske Republik at betale sagens omkostninger.«
(2) order the Republic of Italy to pay the costs.'
Sag C-350/93 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik Statsstøtte
Case C-350/93 Commission of the European Communities ν Italy State Aid
»Traktatbrudssag — statsstøtte, der er uforenelig med offentligt holdingselskab« (Domstolens plenum) inden for fristen på to måneder efter beslutningens meddelelse og har undladt at kræve støtten tilbagebetalt fra ENI til den italienske stat.
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — State aid incompatible with the common market - Recovery - Public holding company) (Full Court) notification of the decision of the measures taken to comply tnerewith.
I beslutningen fastslås det utvetydigt, at den italienske regering er forpligtet til at rejse krav om tilbagebetaling af støtten inden to måneder efter meddelelsen af beslutningen, der fandt sted den 10. august 1988.
By application lodged on 7 July 1993, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to abolish and recover within the prescribed period the aid paid to the ENI-Lanerossi Group (now SNAM SpA) in the amount of LIT 260.4 thousand million, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Commission Decision 89/43/EEC of 26 July 1988 on aid granted by the Italian Government to ENI-Lanerossi.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 7. juli 1993 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af EØF-traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, andet afsnit, anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik har undladt at opfylde de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til Kommissionens beslutning 89/43/EØF af 26. juli 1988 om den italienske regerings støtte til ENI-Lanerossi, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har ophævet og foranstaltet tilbagebetaling af den støtte på i alt 260,4 mia. LIT, der blev ydet ENI-Lanerossi-koncernen (nu selskabet SNAM SpA).
It was not until after the application had been lodged that SNAM SpA as the successor of Lanerossi, transferred to ENI the sum of LIT 362.241 thousand million, which, according to the Italian Republic, represented the principal sum of and the interest due on the aid which the Commission had required the defendant to recover.
Den undladte tilbagebetaling af støtten fra ENI til den italienske stat
The complaint alleging failure to recover the aid within the prescribed period
Ifølge fast retspraksis har forpligtelsen for staten til at ophæve en støtte, som af Kommissionen er fundet uforenelig med fællesmarkedet, til formål at genoprette den oprindelige situation.
The decision clearly sets out the obligation on the Italian Government to seek repayment of the aid within two months of 10 August 1988, the
Kommissionen fastslog i beslutningen, at den støtte på 260,4 mia. LIT, som var blevet ydet ENI-Lanerossi i form af kapitalindskud i koncernens datterselskaber, der fremstiller herretøj, var ulovlig, da den var blevet ydet i strid med traktatens artikel 93, stk. 3, og var uforenelig med fællesmarkedet i henhold til traktatens artikel 92.
In the decision the Commission found that the aid of LIT 260.4 thousand million granted to ENI-Lanerossi in the form of capital injections in favour of its subsidiaries manufacturing menswear was illegal on the ground that it was in breach of the provisions of Article 93(3) of the Treaty and was incompatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 92 of the Treaty.
Den bestemte, at støtten skulle kræves tilbagebetalt.
The Commission decided that the aid in question should be withdrawn by recovery.
Den italienske regering skulle inden to måneder fra beslutningens meddelelse underrette Kommissionen om de foranstaltninger, den havde truffet for at efterkomme den.
The Italian Government was required to inform the Commission within two months of the date of
Først efter sagens anlæg overførte SNAM SpA som var trådt i selskabet Lanerossi's sted, til ENI det beløb på 362,241 mia. LIT, der efter Den Italienske Republiks oplysninger udgør støttebeløbet med tillæg af renter, som Kommissionen havde krævet tilbagebetalt.
advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to payment of the aid is restored.
Dette formål er opnået, når den pågældende støtte, eventuelt med tillæg af morarenter, af støttemodtageren, altså i den foreliggende sag SNAM SpA er blevet tilbagebetalt til ENI, der er et offentligt organ, som forvalter statslige kapitalandele.
SNAM SpA did not repay the aid to ENI until 11 October 1993.
Kommissionen har til støtte for påstanden gjort gældende, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, idet den ikke har gennemført tilbagesøgning af støtten
The complaint alleging failure by ENI to repay the aid to the Italian State
Kommissionen har i beslutningens artikel 2 bloi stillet krav om, at den italienske regering ophæver støtten og kræver denne tilbagebetalt fra SNAM SpA inden en vis tid med tillæg af
In Article 2 of the decision, the Commission merely required the Italian Government to abolish the aid and oblige SNAM SpA to repay it within a certain period, with default interest after the expiry of that period.
92's forstand, har Kommissionen dog ikke, som den har gjort gældende, efter afslutningen af den i traktaten fastlagte procedure, i beslutningen fastslået, at den finansiering, staten stillede til rådighed for ENI, også udgør en støtte, der er uforenelig med fællesmarkedet.
That objective is attained once the aid in question, increased where appropriate by default interest, has been repaid by the recipient, in this case SNAM SpA, to ENI, the public body responsible for managing State holdings. By repaying the aid, the recipient forfeits the
Selv om det ikke kan udelukkes, at statens tildeling af midler til en offentlig institution som ENI kan udgøre en statsstøtte i traktatens artikel
However, while it cannot be ruled out that the allocation of funds by the State to a public body such as ENI may constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the Treaty, the Commission, contrary to its submissions, did not find in the decision, on completion of the procedure laid down in the Treaty, that the fact that funds were made available by the State to ENI also constitutes aid incompatible with the common market.
Den Italienske Republik har undladt at opfylde de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til Kommissionens beslutning 89/43/EØF af 26. juli 1988 om den italienske regerings støtte til ENI-Lanerossi, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har ophævet og foranstaltet tilbagebetaling af den støtte på i alt 260,4 mia. LIT, der blev ydet ENI-Lanerossi-koncernen (nu selskabet SNAM SpA).
Declared that, by failing to abolish and recover within the prescribed period the aid paid to the ENI-Lanerossi Group (now SNAM SpA) in the amount of LIT 260.4 thousand million, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Commission Decision 89/43/EEC of 26 July 1988 on aids granted by the Italian Government to ENI-Lanerossi;
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Domstolens plenum") den 2. februar 1995.
Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 2 February 1995.
Han fandt, at Domstolen burde :
He considered that the Court should:
»1) fastslå, at Den Italienske Republik ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har gennemført Kommissionens beslutning 89/43/EØF om den italienske regerings støtte til ENI-Lanerossi og således ikke har overholdt sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-traktaten.
'(1) declare that, by failing to implement Commission Decision 89/43/EEC on aids granted by the Italian Government to ENI-Lanerossi within the prescribed period, the Republic of Italy has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
(Domstolens plenum) arbejdstagere med marokkansk statsborgerskab og deres familiemedlemmer, der bor hos dem, for så vidt angår social sikring — en klar og præeis forpligtelse, hvis opfyldelse eller retsvirkninger for alle andre spørgsmål end dem, der omhandles i artiklens stk. 2, 3 og 4 — ikke er betinget af, at der udstedes yderligere retsakter.
Accordingly, the direct effect which Article 39(1) of the Agreement must be recognized as having entails that persons to whom that provision applies are entitled to rely on it in proceedings before national courts.
Heraf har Domstolen udledt, at bestemmelsen kan skabe umiddelbare retsvirkninger.
plaintiff in the main proceedings, in her capacity as the widow of an Algerian migrant worker, who lives in the Member State in which the worker spent all his working life before he died and who is the recipient there of a survivor's pension paid in consequence of such employment, is covered by Article 39(1) of the Agreement.
Artikel 39, stk. 1, i samarbejdsaftalen EØF-Algeriet er affattet i tilsvarende vendinger som artikel 41, stk. 1, i samarbejdsaftalen EØF-Marokko, og de to aftaler har samme formål.
With regard, secondly, to the term 'social security' used in Article 39(1) of the Agreement, it must be deemed to bear the same meaning as the identical term used in Regulation No 1408/71.
Spørgsmålet er rejst under en tvist mellem Zoulika Krid, som er algerisk statsborger, og CNAVTS vedrørende sidstnævntes afslag på at tildele et supplerende tilskud fra Fonds national de solidarité (herefter benævnt »FNS«).
In order to determine the scope of the principle of nondiscrimination laid down in Article 39(1) of the Cooperation Agreement, it is necessary to examine on the one hand whether a person such as the plaintiff in the main proceedings is covered by that provision and, on the other, whether a benefit such as the supplementary allowance from the FNS at issue in the main proceedings comes within the field of social security within the meaning of that provision.
Den direkte virkning, som derfor må tillægges aftalens artikel 39, stk. 1, indebærer, at de retsundergivne, som bestemmelsen finder anvendelse på, er berettiget til at påberåbe sig den for de nationale domstole.
Even though, prior to its amendment by Regulation No 1247/92, Regulation No 1408/71 did not specifically mention amongst the social security branches to which it applies benefits of the same kind as the supplementary allowance from the FNS, the Court had nevertheless consistently held that the allowance fell within the matters covered by Regulation No 1408/71 by virtue of Article 4(1) thereof.
Med sit præjudicielle spørgsmål ønsker den nationale ret i det væsentlige ønsker oplyst, om aftalens artikel 39, stk. 1, skal fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for, at en medlemsstat afslår at tildele en ydelse som det supplerende tilskud fra FNS — der er foreskrevet i medlemsstatens lovgivning til fordel for statsborgere, som er bosat i denne stat — til enken efter en algerisk arbejdstager, som er bosat i den pågældende medlemsstat, og som dér oppebærer en efterladtepension, med den begrundelse, at hun er algerisk statsborger.
Furthermore, since Regulation No 1247/92 came into force on 1 June 1992, benefits such as the supplementary allowance from the FNS have been expressly included within the matters covered by Regulation No 1408/71.
For at bestemme rækkevidden af forbuddet mod forskelsbehandling i aftalens artikel 39, stk. 1, må det undersøges, dels om en person som sagsøgeren i hovedsagen er omfattet af bestemmelsens personelle anvendelsesområde, dels om en ydelse som det i hovedsagen omhandlede supplerende tilskud fra FNS er omfattet af begrebet social sikringsordning i samme bestemmelse.
With regard to the persons covered by Article 39(1) of the Agreement, it should be noted that the provision applies first and foremost to workers of Algerian nationality, a concept to be understood in the broad sense.
For at kunne besvare dette spørgsmål må det først undersøges, om aftalens artikel 39, stk. 1, kan påberåbes direkte af private for en national ret, og dernæst, om bestemmelsen dækker situationen for et familiemedlem til en algerisk vandrende arbejdstager, som i den medlemsstat, hvor vedkommende er bosat og oppebærer en efterladtepension, ansøger om en ydelse af den art, som er omhandlet i hovedsagen.
The term "workers' must be understood as encompassing both active workers and those who have left the labour market after reaching the age required for receipt of an old-age pension or after becoming the victims of the materialization of one of the risks conferring entitlement to allowances under other social security branches.
Den direkte virkning af aftalens artikel 39, stk. 1
Furthermore, Article 39(1) of the Agreement also applies to members of those workers' families living with them in the Member State in which they are employed.
Hvad for det første angår det personelle anvendelsesområde for aftalens artikel 39, stk. 1, bemærkes, at denne bestemmelse hitsi og fremmest finder anvendelse på arbejdstagere med algerisk statsborgerskab, hvilket begreb må forstås i vid betydning.
Since the term 'social security' used in Article 39(1) of the Agreement cannot be given a definition different from that which it is recognized as having in the context of Regulation No 1408/71, a benefit of the same kind as the supplementary allowance from the FNS comes within the field of social security within the meaning of that provision.
Ifølge Domstolens faste praksis indeholder artikel 41, stk. 1, i samarbejdsaftalen mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Kongeriget Marokko, undertegnet i Rabat den 27. april 1976 — som efter sin ordlyd klart, præcist og ubetinget opstiller et forbud mod forskelsbehandling på grundlag af nationalitet af
'Article 39(1) of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, signed in Algiers on 26 April 1976 and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2210/78 of 26 September 1978, must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing to grant a benefit such as the supplementary allowance from the FNS, which is provided for under its legislation for its own nationals who are resident in that State, to the widow of an Algerian worker, who is resident in that Member State and is the recipient of a survivor's pension there, on the ground that she is of Algerian nationality.'
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum1) den 23. februar 1995.
Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 23 February 1993.
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse :
He proposed the following reply:
»Artikel 39, stk. 1, i samarbejdsaftalen mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Den Demokratiske Folkerepublik Algeriet, som er undertegnet i Algier den 26. april 1976 og godkendt på Fællesskabets vegne ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2210/78 af 26. september 1978, skal fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for, at en medlemsstat afslår at tildele det i sin lovgivning til fordel for dens statsborgere, som er bosat på nationalt område, foreskrevne supplerende tilskud fra Den Nationale Solidaritetsfond, til en enke efter en arbejdstager, som er bosat på dens område, og som oppebærer en efterladtepension, med den begrundelse, at hun er algerisk statsborger.«
'Article 39(1) of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, signed in Algiers on 26 April 1976 and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2210/78 of 26 September 1978, must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing to grant a supplementary allowance from the Fonds National de Solidarité, which is provided for under its legislation for its own nationals who are resident in that State, to the widow of an Algerian worker, who is resident in that Member State and is the recipient of a survivor's pension, on the ground that she is of Algerian nationality.'
Forenede sager C-241/91 Ρ og C-242/91 Ρ Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) og Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Konkurrence
Joined Cases C-241/91 Ρ and C-242/91 Ρ Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) and Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) ν Commission of the European Communities Competition
6.4.1995 stilling — ophavsret*
6 April 1995
»Konkurrence — misbrug af dominerende (Domstolens plenum) nedlagt forbud mod offentliggørelse af de ugentlige programoversigter.
(Competition (Full Court) prevented from doing so by the appellants and the BBC, which obtained injunctions prohibiting publication of weekly television listings.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 19. september 1991 har RTE og ΓΓΡ iværksat appel af Rettens domme af 10. juli 1991 (sag T-69/89, RTE, og sag T-76/89, ITP).
By applications lodged on 19 September 1991, RTE and ITP appealed against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 1991 (T-69/89, RTE and T-76/89, ITP).
Magill havde indgivet en klage til Kommissionen med henblik på at få fastslået, at appellanterne og BBC misbrugte deres dominerende stilling ved at nægte at meddele licenser til offentliggørelse af deres respektive ugentlige programoversigter.
Magill lodged a complaint with the Commission seeking a declaration that the appellants and the BBC were abusing their dominant position by refusing to grant licences for the publication of their respective weekly listings.
Kommissionen besluttede at indlede en procedure og vedtog på grundlag heraf beslutning 89/205/EØF af 21. december 1988, som var genstand for sagerne for Retten.
The Commission decided to initiate a proceeding, at the end of which it adopted Decision 89/205/EEC of 21 December 1988 which was the subject-matter of proceedings before the Court of First Instance.
De fleste husstande i Irland og 30-40% af husstandene i Nordirland kan modtage RTE's, ITV's og BBC's tv-udsendelser.
Most households in Ireland and 30% to 40% of households in Northern Ireland can receive television programmes broadcast by RTE, ITV and BBC.
På det for sagerne relevante tidspunkt fandtes der ikke noget generelt ugentligt tv-programblad på markedet i Irland og Nordirland.
At the material time, no comprehensive weekly television guide was available on the market in Ireland or in Northern Ireland.
Tv-stationerne udgav hver især et særligt tv-programblad, som udelukkende indeholdt stationens egne programmer, og de forbeholdt sig ophavsretten til deres ugentlige programoversigter i henhold til Irlands og Det Forenede Kongeriges lovgivning for at forhindre gengivelse af oversigterne fra tredjemands side.
Each television station published a television guide covering exclusively its own programmes and claimed, under Irish and United Kingdom legislation, copyright protection for its own weekly programme listings in order to prevent their reproduction by third parties.
I beslutningen fastslog Kommissionen, at der forelå en overtrædelse af EØF-traktatens artikel 86, og den pålagde de tre selskaber at bringe overtrædelsen til ophør ved bl.a. »efter anmodning og på et ikke diskriminerende grundlag at levere hinanden og andre interesserede parter deres egne ugentlige forhåndsoversigter over programmer og tillade, at sådanne parter gengiver disse oversigter«.
In that decision the Commission found that there had been a breach of Article 86 of the EEC Treaty and ordered the three organizations to put an end to that breach, in particular 'by supplying ... third parties on request and on a non-discriminatory basis with their individual advance weekly programme listings and by permitting reproduction of those listings by such parties'.
Kommissionen anførte endvidere, at såfremt de tre selskaber måtte vælge at meddele licenser til gengivelse af programoversigterne, skal eventuelle licensafgifter være rimelige.
It was also provided that, if the three organizations chose to grant reproduction licences, any royalties requested should be reasonable.
ITP, RTE og BBC havde følgende politik for så vidt angår oplysninger om deres programmer.
ITP, RTE and BBC practised the following policy with regard to the dissemination of programme listings.
De sendte uden beregning programmerne til dagblade og tidsskrifter, der anmodede herom, idet programmerne var ledsaget af en gratis licens, som fastlagde betingelserne for gengivelse af oplysningerne.
They provided their programme schedules free of charge, on request, to daily and periodical newspapers, accompanied by a licence for which no charge was made, setting out the conditions under which that information could be reproduced.
Pressen kunne således offentliggøre programmerne for den pågældende dag eller, såfremt den følgende dag var en helligdag, programmerne for to dage, hvorved der gjaldt visse betingelser med hensyn til rubrikkernes format.
Daily listings and, if the following day was a public holiday, the listings for two days, could thus be published in the press, subject to certain conditions relating to the format of publication.
Det var også tilladt at offentliggøre ugens »højdepunkter«.
Publication of 'highlights' of the week was also authorized.
ΓΤΡ, RTE og BBC sikrede en nøje overholdelse af de i licensen opstillede betingelser ved om nødvendigt at retsforfølge blade, som ikke respekterede dem.
ITP, RTE and the BBC ensured strict compliance with the licence conditions by instituting legal proceedings, where necessary, against publications which failed to comply with them.
Magill TV Guide Ltd forsøgte at udgive et generelt ugentligt tv-programblad, men blev forhindret heri af appellanterne og BBC, som fik
Magill TV Guide Ltd attempted to publish a comprehensive weekly television guide but was
Retten frifandt Kommissionen.
The Court of First Instance dismissed the appellants' applications.