natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der gøres kun én undtagelse fra denne almindelige regel, nemlig i artikel 1, stk. 2, hvorefter medlemsstaterne kan undlade at anvende direktivet på investeringsselskaber med variabel kapital og på kooperative selskaber, der er oprettet i aktieselskabsform.
Those questions were raised in the course of proceedings brought against Trapeza Kentrikis Ellados AE, a public limited company (hereinafter 'TKE Bank'), and its new shareholders, by its old shareholders, Panagis Pafitis and others, who object to the increases in the capital of TKE Bank by decision of the Governor of the Bank of Greece.
Da undtagelsen ikke omfatter banker, der drives i aktieselskabsform, er de således omfattet af andet direktiv.
There is only one exception to that general rule, namely that provided for in Article 1(2) which authorizes the Member States not to apply the directive to investment companies with variable capital or cooperatives in the form of public limited companies.
Hvorvidt andet direktivs artikel 25 er anvendelig ved saneringsforanstaltninger i banker
Since banks in the form of public limited companies do not come within that exception they are covered by the Second Directive.
De sagsøgte har gjort gældende, at den omhandlede forhøjelse af selskabskapitalen er en saneringsforanstaltning i et kreditinstitut, som ikke er omfattet af andet direktivs artikel 25.
The applicability of Article 25 of the Second Directive to measures for the reorganization of banks
I forelæggelsesbeslutningen udtrykker den nationale domstol tvivl om, hvorvidt Domstolens praksis for så vidt angår almindelige aktieselskaber, hvorefter der gælder et princip om generalforsamlingens kompetence til at træffe beslutning om kapitalforhøjelser, ligeledes finder anvendelse på banker, som dñves i form af aktieselskaber, idet det anføres, at græsk ret indeholder særlige bestemmelser om banker, der drives som aktieselskaber.
In its decision, the national court questions whether the case-law of the Court which, in relation to ordinary public limited companies, upholds the principle that the general meeting of shareholders has the authority to resolve upon increases of capital, extends also to banks in the form of public limited companies since, under Greek law, a measure governing banks applies specifically to such banks.
Disse bestemmelser har til formål at sikre bankernes sanering på grund af bankernes særlige betydning for kreditgivningen, for depotsikkerheden og for samfundsøkonomiens udvikling, begrundelser, som er i almenvellets interesse.
The aim of that Law is to provide for the reorganization of banks, by reason of their particular importance in relation to credit facilities, the guarantee of deposits and the proper operation of the national economy,
af aktieselskaber i almindelighed, men heraf følger ikke, at medlemsstaterne lovligt kan træffe saneringsforanstaltninger over for sådanne institutter, som strider mod direktivets bestemmelser, der finder anvendelse på banker.
The defendants in the main proceedings contend that the increase in capital at issue constitutes a measure for the reorganization of a credit establishment which falls outside the scope of Article 25 of the Second Directive.
Direktivet er ikke til hinder for, at dér træffes tvangsfuldbyrdelsesforanstaltninger til selskabets opløsning og navnlig iværksættes afviklingsordninger, som indebærer, at selskabet sættes under tvungen administration for at beskytte kreditorernes rettigheder.
The legislation at issue in this case provides for a temporary administrator whose appointment causes all the powers and authorities of the organs of the company, including the general meeting, to lapse.
Direktivet finder derimod fortsat anvendelse, når der blot er tale om en saneringsordning, der skal sikre selskabets fortsatte beståen, selv om ordningen indebærer, at selskabets aktionærer og normale organer midlertidigt fratages rådigheden.
Appointments of that kind measures wholly analogous to execution measures, in particular rules on liquidation and, in addition, mean that, owing to the removal of powers from the shareholders and the normal organs of the company, the company does not continue to exist within its own structures.
Hvad angår saneringsforanstaltninger, finder artikel 25, som i overensstemmelse med andet direktivs formål skal stiere et mindstemål af beskyttelse af aktionærer i samtlige medlemsstater, nemlig - når der ikke foreligger en udtrykkelig undtagelsesbestemmelse -anvendelse på kreditinstitutter under de samme betingelser, som gælder for enhver anden virksomhed med særlig betydning for samfundsøkonomien, som på grund af gældsættelse befinder sig i en kritisk situation.
Admittedly, although the Second Directive does not specifically refer to the reorganization of credit institutions or to public limited companies in general and although those matters have not yet been the subject of Community harmonization, it does not follow that it is open to the Member States to adopt reorganization measures in that field which run counter to the provisions of the Second Directive, which apply to banks.
I det foreliggende tilfælde svarer det forhold, at der er udpeget en midlertidig tilforordnet, hverken til, at der træffes tvangsfuldbyrdelsesforanstaltninger eller navnlig til, at der iværksættes afviklingsordninger, skønt alle de vedtægtsbestemte organers beføjelser og kompetencer overgår til denne tilforordnede.
In this case, the appointment of a temporary administrator does not resemble an execution measure, or, in particular, a liquidation measure, even though all the powers and authorities of the organs of the company are transferred to that administrator.
Heraf følger imidlertid ikke, at en sådan national ordning nødvendigvis må indebære foranstaltninger, hvorefter kreditinstituttets organer fratages den kompetence, soni de soni selskabsorganer har fået tillagt i medfør af andet direktivs artikel 25.
Article 29(3) of the Second Directive concerns the procedures for an offer of subscription on a preemptive basis which, by virtue of Article 29(1), must be made to the shareholders of a public limited company whenever the capital is increased by consideration in cash.
Dét er ubestridt, at den græske lovgivning på dét relevante tidspunkt ikke som krævet i artikel 29, stk. 3, indeholdt bestemmelser om offentliggørelsen af underretningen i den officielle nationale tidende udpeget med dette formål.
As far as reorganization measures are concerned, Article 25, which, in accordance with the objective of the Second Directive, provides a minimum level of protection for shareholders in all the Member States, applies, in the absence of any express exception, to credit establishments under the same conditions as to any other undertaking which is of special importance to the economy and, by reason of its debt burden, is in exceptional circumstances.
I denne sammenhæng har den nationale domstol spurgt, om offentliggørelsen af tilbuddet i visse dagblade kan anses for en skriftlig underretning i den i andet direktivs artikel 29, stk 3, tredje punktum, anførte betydning.
It is common ground that, at the material time, the Greek legislation did not provide, in accordance with that provision, for the publication ofinformation in the national gazette appointed for that purpose.
Med henblik på at besvare dette spørgsmål bemærkes, at artikel 29, stk. 3, skal sikre, at alle indehavere af aktier lydende på navn underrettes personligt og individuelt om, hvorledes de kan udøve deres fortegningsret, når der ikke til dette formål er udpeget en officiel national tidende.
The defendants in the main proceedings contend, secondly, that the lex specialis status of banking legislation is closely linked to the fact that supervisory rules are provisions adopted in the public interest.
Det bestemmes nemlig i den i denne sag omhandlede lovgivning, at der skal udpeges en midlertidigt tilforordnet, hvorved enhver beføjelse og kompetence, der tilkommer de vedtægtsmæssige organer, herunder generalforsamlingen, umiddelbart ophører og overgår til denne tilforordnede.
It is true that considerations concerning the need to protect the interests of savers and, more generally, the equilibrium of the savings system, require strict supervisory rules in order to ensure the continuing stability of the banking system.
Misbrug af beføjelser fulde virkning og ensartede anvendelse i medlemsstaterne.
Accordingly, the national court asks whether publishing a notice in daily newspapers is to be regarded, for the purposes of the third sentence of Article 29(3) of the Second Directive, as informing the shareholders in writing.
I dette tilfælde ville det være til hinder for fællesskabsrettens ensartede anvendelse og fulde virkning, dersom en aktionær, som gør andet direktivs artikel 25, stk. 1, gældende, ansås for at misbruge sine beføjelser, blot fordi han var mindretalsaktionær i et selskab, som var omfattet af en saneringsordning, eller fordi han havde haft fordel af selskabets sanering.
However, it does not follow that national rules of that kind must necessarily provide for measures which deprive the organs of a credit establishment of the powers vested in them, as organs of a public limited company, by Article 25 of the Second Directive.
Skønt den nationale dommer ikke har forelagt noget spørgsmål herom, og det derfor ikke er nødvendigt at udtale sig om, hvorvidt det inden for Fællesskabets retsorden er tilladt at anvende en national bestemmelse til vurdering af, om en rettighed, der følger af de omhandlede fællesskabsbestemmelser, misbruges, står det ikke desto mindre fast, at gennemførelsen af en sådan bestemmelse under alle omstændigheder ikke må være til hinder for fællesskabsbestemmelsernes
In order to answer that question, it must be borne in mind that Article 29(3) seeks to ensure that, in the absence of publication in the national gazette appointed for that purpose, all owners of registered shares are given information addressed to them individually by name concerning the procedures for exercising their preemptive rights.
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
The conditions for the application of Article 25 of the Second Directive
Offentliggørelse af tilbuddet om fortegningsret i visse dagblade er ikke skriftlig underretning af aktionærer, hvis aktier lyderpå navn, i den i artikel 29, stk. 3, tredje punktum, i direktiv 77/91 anførte betydning.*
The defendants in the main proceedings contend that, in any event, the conditions for the application of Article 25 of the Second Directive are not satisfied.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Plenum) den 9. november 1995.
Although, since the national court has submitted no question on the matter, it is unnecessary to rule as to whether it is permissible, under the Community legal order, to apply a national rule
Offentliggørelse i dagblade af et tilbud om fortegningsret og af fristen for udnyttelse af denne ret er ikke en skriftlig underretning til aktionærerne.«
in considering whether a right conferred by the provisions of Community law at issue is being exercised abusively, the fact remains that, in any event, the application of such a rule must not detract from the full effect and uniform application of Community law in the Member States.
Præjudiciel »Bruxelles-konventionen —fortolkning af artikel 47, nr. 1 — dokumenter som skal fremlægges af den part, der begærer fuldbyrdelse - pligt til at fremlægge bevis for, at retsafgørelsen er forkyndt — mulighed for at fremlægge bevis for forkyndelsen, efter at begæringen er fremsat* (Femte Afdeling) fuldbyrdelsespåtegning til følge i strid med kravene i konventionens artikel 47, nr. 1, da der ikke var fremlagt noget dokument, hvoraf det fremgik, at udeblivelsesdommene var blevet forkyndt, eller at de var eksigible.
Article 25 of the Second Council Directive (77/91/EEC) of 13 December 1976 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent precludes national rules whereby the capital of a bank in the form of a public limited company which, as a result of its debt burden, is in exceptional circumstances may be increased by an administrative measure, without a resolution of the general meeting.
Med spørgsmålene ønsker den forelæggende ret i det væsentlige oplyst, om konventionens artikel 47, nr. 1, skal fortolkes således, at beviset for, at den retsafgørelse, der begæres fuldbyrdet, er forkyndt, kan føresefter fremsættelsen af begæringen, særlig under en appel- eller genoptagelsessag, som senere er iværksat af den part, mod hvem begæringen er rettet.
Publication of an offer of subscription in daily newspapers does not constitute information given in writing to the holders of registered shares within the meaning of the third sentence of Article 29(3) of ine Second Directive.'
Sagen angår fuldbyrdelse i Belgien af to udeblivelsesdomme, som er afsagt af Landgericht Bonn- Ved dommene blev R. van der Linden tilpligtet at betale forsikringsselskabet nærmere bestemte beløb.
Advocate General G. Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 9 November 1995.
Ganske vist bestemmes det i konventionens artikel 33, stk. 3, at de dokumenter, som er nævnt i artikel 46 og 47, skal vedlægges begæringen, men dette kan ikke medføre, at de nationale processuelle regler, som der i artikel 33, stk. 1, henvises til med hensyn til f r e mga ngs måden ved fremsættelse af begæringen, herunder med hensyn til frister og formkrav, ikke kan _BAR__BAR_ive adgang til en afhjælpning under proceduren ved fremlæggelse af bevis for forkyndelsen på et senere stadium end fremsættelsen af begæringen, når det formål, der forfølges med konventionens artikel 33, stk. 3, og artikel 47, nr. 1, tilgodeses.
'Articles 25(1) and 29(3) of the Second Council Directive (77/91/EEC) of 13 December 1976 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent, must be interpreted as meaning that:
R. van der Linden rejste tredjemandsindsigelse mod afgørelsen, idet han bla. gjorde gældende, at Rechtbank havde taget begæringen om
— the application is precluded of national legislation which, in order to ensure the recovery and continuing trading of banks constituted in the form of public limited companies which, as a result of their indebtedness, find themselves in exceptional circumstances, allows their capital to be increased by administrative measure and without a resolution of the general meeting; and the mere
Nationale processuelle regler, hvorefter den ret, over for hvilken begæringen er fremsat, kan tage en godtgørelse af, at retsafgørelsen er forkyndt, i betragtning under den ikke-kontradiktoriske procedure, er ikke uforenelige med dette formål. Det må dog kræves, at den part, mod hvem fuldbyrdelse begæres—som ikke er repræsenteret på dette stadium af proceduren — skal råde over en rimelig frist til frivilligt at opfylde
Preliminary ruling (Brussels Convention — Interpretation of Article 47(1) —Documents to be produced by a party applying for enforcement — Obligation to produce proof of service of the judgment delivered — Possibility of producing proof of service after the application has been made) (Fifth Chamber)
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
Rechtbank van Eerste Aanleg (Court of First Instance), Bruges (hereinafter 'the Rechtbank').
»Artikel 47, nr. 1, i konventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgeruge sager, herunder handelssager, som ændret ved konventionen af 9. oktober 1978 om Kongeriget Danmarks, Irlands og Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirlands tiltrædelse skal fortolkes således, at beviset for, at retsafgørelsen er forkyndt, i tilfælde hvor de nationale processuelle regler giver adgang hertil, kan føres efter fremsættelsen af begæringen, herunder også under en appel- eller genoptagelsessag, som senere er iværksat af den part, mod hvem fuldbyrdelse begæres, dog således at denne skal råde over en rimelig frist til frivilligt at opfylde retsafgørelsen, og således, at den part, der begærer fuldbyrdelse, skal bære omkostningerne ved enhver unødvendig procedure.*
By order of 30 September 1994, received at the Court on 11 October 1994, the Hofvan Cassatie van Bclgïe (Belgian Court of Cassation) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling, two questions on the interpretation of Article 47(1) of the Convention on Jurisdiction and the enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (hereinafter 'the Convention').
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 30. januar 1996.
Mr Van der Linden lodged an appeal against that decision. He complained, in particular, that the Rechtbank had allowed the application for enforcement despite the fact that, contrary to the requirements of Article 47(1) of the Convention, no document had been produced to show that the default judgments had been served and were enforceable.
»1) Konventionens artikel 47, nr. 1, skal fortolkes således, at den ret, over for hvilken der er fremsat begæring om f uld byrdelses t illadelse, kun kan give tilladelse til fuldbyrdelse af en retsafgørelse, der er truffet i en anden kontraherende stat, hvis der også fremlægges bevis for, at retsafgørelsen er forkyndt.
Those questions were raised in proceedings between Mr Van der Linden, a Belgian national, at the material time engaged in the resale of motor vehicles at Blankenberge (Belgium), and the Berufsgenossenschaft der Feinmechanik und Elektrotechnik, a German insurance company (hereinafter 'the insurer').
Når der er adgang hertil efter nationale processuelle regler, kan et sådant bevis også anerkendes på et hvilket som helst tidspunkt, før der træffes afgørelse om begæringen, dog på betingelse af, at den part, mod hvem fuldbyrdelse begæres, har haft en passende adgang til frivilligt at opfylde retsafgørelsen efter forkyndelsen, og at den part, der begærer fuldbyrdelse, bærer ansvaret for enhver unødvendig procedure.
Those proceedings concern the enforcement in Belgium of two judgments given in default ordering Mr Van der Linden to pay the insurer certain sums.
2) Konventionens artikel 47, nr. 1, skal fortolkes således, at den ret, for hvilken der er iværksat appel eller indgivet begæring om genoptagelse af en tilladelse til at fuldbyrde en retsafgørelse, der er truffet i en anden kontraherende stat, under påberåbelse af, at tilladelse er givet, uden at der er fremlagt bevis for forkyndelse af retsafgørelsen, kun kan stadfæste afgørelsen om at meddele tilladelsen, hvis der fremlægges bevis for forkyndelsen, og de nationale processuelle regler tillader, at der fremlægges et sådant bevis under appel eller genoptagelsessagen.
By those questions, the national court is essentially asking whether Article 47(1) of the Convention is to be interpreted as meaning that proof of service of the judgment of which enforcement is sought can be produced after the application has been lodged, in particular during the course of appeal proceedings subsequently brought by the party against whom that application is made.
Dette gælder på betingelse af, at den part mod hvem fuldbyrdelse begæres, har haft en passende adgang til frivilligt at opfylde retsafgørelsen efter forkyndelsen, at den part, der begærer
On 2 February 1982, upon application by the insurer, those judgments were rendered enforceable in Belgium by decision of the
fuldbyrdelse, bærer ansvaret for enhver unødvendig procedure, og at den part, mod hvem fuldbyrdelse begæres, ikke på anden måde lider skade ved, at begæringen berigtiges under appel- eller genoptagelsessagen.« ssssessa
46 and 47 must be attached to the application, that does not mean that the domestic procedural rules, to which the first paragraph of Article 33 refers as regards determination of the time when the application is to be made and of the form which it is to take, may not provide for the procedure to be regularized by production of proof of service after the application has been lodged, provided that the objective pursued by the Convention in the third paragraph of Article 33 and Article 47(1) is respected.
Den har anført, at forsinkelsen skyldes vanskeligheder ved gennemførelsen af direktivet, og har gjort gældende, at det under alle omstændigheder forventes gennemført i italiensk ret snarest.
In that regard, the purpose of serving the judgment on the defendant is to inform him of the judgment given against him and to give him the opportunity to satisfy it voluntarily before enforcement can be applied for.
Ved stævning registreret på Domstolens Justitskontor den 6. juli 1995 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik ved ikke at have vedtaget Og givet underretning om de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser for at efterkomme Kommissionens direktiv 93/67/EØF har undladt at opfylde sine forpligtelser i henhold til nævnte direktiv og EF-traktaten.
Domestic rules of procedure allowing the court to which application is made to take into consideration, in ex parte proceedings, proof that the judgment has been served are not incompatible with such an objective, provided that the party against whom enforcement is sought, who is not represented at this stage of proceedings, is given a reasonable period of time in which to satisfy the judgment voluntarily and that the party seeking enforcement bears all costs unnecessarily incurred.
I medfør af direktivets artikel 8, stk. 1, skulle medlemsstaterne senest den 31. oktober 1993 vedtage de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser for at efterkomme direktivet og
Article 48 is merely a special provision whose scope is limited to the sphere which it governs, and which cannot therefore attach any other limitations to the general principle that domestic procedural rules which respect the essential requirements of the Convention will normally be applicable.
Den Italienske Republik har undladt at opfylde sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 8 i Kommissionens direktiv 93/67fEØF af 20. juli 1993 om fastsættelse af principperne for vurderingen af risikoen for mennesker og miljøet ved stoffer, der anmeldes i overensstemmelse med Rådets direktiv 67J548/EØF, idet den ikke inden for dat fastsatte frist har vedtaget de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser for at efterkomme direktiv 93f67.
'Article 47(1) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, is to be interpreted as meaning that, where lhe domestic procedural rules so permit, proof of service of the judgment may be produced after the application has been made, in particular during the course of appeal proceedings subsequently brought by the party against whom enforcement is sought, provided that that party is given
Generaladvokat N. Fennellv fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 1. februar 1996.
Advocate General N. Fennelly delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 30 January 1996.