natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det tredje kan EFTA-staterne bemyndige deres domstole til at anmode Domstolen om at træffe en afgørelse og ikke om "at udtale sig" om fortolkningen af en bestemmelse i aftalen.
As regards provisions of the agreement under which EFTA States may authorize their courts to request the Court of Justice to decide on the interpretation of a provision of the agreement, it is to be noted that the wording of Article 107 ensures that the answers which the Court of Justice may be called upon to give will be binding. Consequently, that mechanism is compatible with Community law.
For det fjerde indeholder aftalen ikke længere en bestemmelse, der pålægger Domstolen at tage behørigt hensyn til andre retsinstansers afgørelser.
As for the compatibility with the EEC Treaty of the rules contained in Article 56 of the agreement with regard to the sharing of responsibilities in the competition field between the EFTA Surveyance Authority and the Commission of the European Communities, the Court points out that the Community has authority to enter into international agreements under the rules of competition of the EEC Treaty and their implementing measures.
Da forskellene mellem henholdsvis aftalens og fællesskabsrettens formål og kontekst stadig består, undersøgte Domstolen, om de nye bestemmelser i aftalen, der er trådt i stedet for de bestemmelser, som Domstolen havde anset for uforenelige med fællesskabsrettens autonomi, vil kunne give anledning til lignende betænkeligheder.
That power necessarily implies that the Community may accept rules made by virtue of an agreement as to the sharing of the respective competences of the Contracting Parties in the field of competition, provided that those rules do not change the nature of the powers of the Community and of its institutions as conceived in the Treaty.
Til forskel fra, hvad der skulle gælde for EØS-Domstol en, skal EFTA-Domstolen ikke træffe afgørelse i tvister mellem de kontraherende parter og skal udelukkende udøve sine beføjelser inden for EFTA.
It follows that Article 56 of the agreement is compatible with the EEC Treaty.
Domstolen udtalte, at såfremt aftalens artikel 105, som giver Det Blandede Udvalg beføjelse til at sikre den ensartede fortolkning af aftalen, skulle forstås således, at den gav Det Blandede Udvalg mulighed for at se bort fra den bindende virkning af Domstolens afgørelser inden for fællesskabsretten, ville tildeling af en sådan kompetence til udvalget gribe ind i autonomien for Fællesskabets retsorden, som Domstolen ifølge EØF-Traktatens artikel 164 skal værne om, og dermed være uforenelig med Traktaten.
Case C-95/89, Case C-293/89 and Case C-344/90 : Commission ν Italian Republic, Hellenic Republic and French Republic
Efter ordlyden af det godkendte "protokollat ad artikel 105" må beslutning er truffet af Det Blandede Udvalg i henhold til denne artikel imidlertid ikke i noget tilfælde gribe ind i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstols praksis.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Art 30 of the EEC Treaty - Import ban on cheese lawfully produced and marketed in other Member States to which nitrate has been added during processing within the limits permitted by international scientific circles.
Dette princip udgør en væsentlig garanti, der er nødvendig for at sikre fællesskabsrettens autonomi.
Mr. Advocate General Claus Gulmann delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 8 April 1992.
I medfør af artikel 111 har Det Blandede Udvalg kompetence til at bilægge enhver tvist vedrørende fortolkningen og anvendelsen af aftalen, som ind bringes for det af Fællesskabet eller en EFTA-stat, herunder i medfør af artikel 105, stk. 3, tvister, som vedrører en forskel i retspraksis, og som Det Blandede Udvalg ikke har kunnet afgøre i overensstemmelse med den i artikel 105 fastsatte procedure.
Declare that, by banning the import of cheeses lawfully manufactured and marketed in other Member States to which nitrates have been added during processing within limits permitted by international scientific circles, the Italian Republic and the Hellenic have failed to fulfil their obligations under the EEC Treaty;
En sådan fortolkning må nødvendigvis indebære, at det princip, der opstilles i det godkendte "protokollat ad artikel 105", også finder anvendelse, når Det Blandede Udvalg søger at bilægge en tvist ved i over ensstemmelse med artikel 111 at finde en løsning, som de kontraherende parter kan acceptere.
Preliminary ruling - French Cour de Cassation (Court of Cassation) -Interpretation of Article 5(1) of the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 - Special jurisdiction in contractual matters - Action in relation to liability - Action between a sub-purchaser and the manufacturer of an Article by reason of defects or its unsuitability for the intended use
Med hensyn til spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt det er foreneligt med Traktaten at tillægge Domstolen sidstnævnte kompetence, anførte Domstolen, at de beføjelser, Traktaten tillægger Domstolen, kun kan ændres i overensstemmelse med den i Traktatens artikel 236 omhandlede procedure.
"Where an action is brought against the manufacturer of a product by a subsequent purchaser, in the absence of any direct contractual relationship between the parties, in connection with defects in that product or its suitability for the purpose for which it was intended, such an action is to be classified as an action relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict with the consequence that the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred have jurisdiction in accordance with Article 5(3) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Imidlertid kan en international aftale indgået af Fællesskabet tillægge Domstolen nye beføjelser på betingelse af, at dette ikke bevirker, at Domstolens rolle i henhold til EØF-Traktaten ændrer karakter.
That place is to be understood as the place where the event giving rise to the damage occurred or where it directly produced its harmful effects upon the person who was the immediate victim of that event. "
Domstolens rolle i henhold til EØF-Traktaten er nemlig at virke som en rets instans, hvis afgørelser er bindende.
Preliminary ruling - Landgericht Hannover - Interpretation of the
Ganske vist er formålet med at anmode Domstolen om en afgørelse i medfør af aftalens artikel 111, stk. 3, ikke at overlade det til Domstolen at bilægge tvisten, som vedbliver at versere for Det Blandede Udvalg, men det står dog fast, at den fortolkning, Domstolen skal give, er bindende.
Second Council Directive 77/91/EEC of 13 December 1976 on co-ordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of Members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies -Direct applicability of Articles 10, 11 and 27(2) of the
Heraf følger, at hvis Domstolen anmodes om en afgørelse i medfør af aftalens artikel 111, stk. 3, er såvel de kontraherende parter som det blandede udvalg bundet af Domstolens fortolkning af de omtvistede regler.
Directive -Compatibility with Community law of national case-law in relation to contribution of claims made in connection with an increase of the capital of a company.
Følgelig er den kompetence, der i den henseende er givet Domstolen, forenelig med EØF-Traktaten.
Mr Advocate General Giuseppe Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 8 April 1992.
Heraf følger, at bilæggelse af tvister ved voldgift ikke kan krænke fællesskabsretsordenens autonomi.
He proposed that the Court should answer as follows:
Med hensyn til den ordning, der er fastsat i aftalen, hvorefter EFTA-staterne kan bemyndige deres retsinstanser til at anmode Domstolen om at træffe afgørelse om fortolkningen af en bestemmelse i aftalen, fandt Domstolen det tilstrækkeligt at konstatere, at artikel 107 efter sin ordlyd giver garanti for, at de svar, Domstolen afgiver, får bindende virkning, og at denne ordning følgelig er forenelig med fællesskabsretten.
Article 11 of the Second Directive, in conjunction with Articles 10 and 27(2) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that it may not be applied by analogy to cases other than those envisaged therein; the Member States may, however, on the basis of the relevant provisions of the general law within their own legal order, take action against transactions of which the timing raises suspicions and where the parties' intent to circumvent is proved, after interpretation, if appropriate, by the Court of Justice.
Hvad endelig angik spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt bestemmelserne i aftalens artikel 56, der fastlægger kompetencefordelingen på konkurrenceområdet mellem EFTA-tilsynsmyndigheden og Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fælles skaber, er forenelige med EØF-Traktaten, anførte Domstolen, at Fællesskabet i medfør af EØF-Traktatens konkurrenceregler og de retsakter, som er ud stedt til gennemførelse heraf, har kompetence til at indgå internationale aftaler på dette område.
The national court, when called upon to apply the Second Directive, is required to interpret its own national law in the light of the text and the purpose of that directive."
Denne kompetence må nødvendigvis indebære, at Fællesskabet kan acceptere bestemmelser i aftaler om afgrænsningen af de kontraherende parters respektive kompetence på konkurrenceområdet, forudsat at disse betemmelser ikke bevirker, at de beføjelser, Fællesskabet og dets institutioner har i hen hold til Traktaten, ændrer karakter.
Preliminary ruling - Petersfield Magistrates' Court - Interpretation of Article 4(6) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonization of certain social legislation relating to road transport and Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport - scope of the exception provided for in favour of vehicles used in connection with a distribution network.
Heraf følger, at aftalens artikel 56 er forenelig med EØF-Traktaten.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the hearing of the Second Chamber on 8 April 1992.
Traktatbrud - EØF-Traktatens artikel 30 - forbud mod import af oste, der lovligt er fremstillet og bragt i handelen i andre medlemsstater, og som under fremstillingen er blevet tilsat nitrater inden for de grænser, der på videnskabeligt plan internationalt er enighed om at anse for acceptable.
Preliminary ruling - Supreme Court of Ireland - Interpretation of Article 3(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 857/84, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 764/89 of 20 March 1989 - Milk production quotas - Special reference quantity for deliveries and/or direct sales.
Generaladvokat Claus Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet i Domstolens plenum den 8. april 1992.
Mr. Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 8 April 1992.
"Når en senere erhverver anlægger sag mod fabrikanten af en genstand som følge af, at genstanden lider af mangler eller er uegnet til det formål, den skal anvendes til, og der ikke består noget direkte kontraktforhold mellem parterne, skal denne sag klassificeres som en sag om erstatning uden for kontrakt, hvilket bevirker, at retten på det sted, hvor skadetilføjelsen er foregået, har kompetencen i medfør af artikel 5, nr. 3, i konven-
For the purpose of fulfilling the condition prescribed by Article 3a(3) of Council Regulation No 857/84 of 31 March 1984, the sales or deliveries in question are not confined to milk produced on the original holding operated by the producer at the time of his application for a nonmarketing or conversion premium, but may include milk produced on any part of the holding operated by the producer at the time of his application for a provisional reference quantity under Article 3a(l), provided that he still operates, in whole or part, the original holding, and that he has effectively returned to milk production.
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse - Landgericht Hannover - fortolkning af Rådets andet direktiv 77/91/EØF af 13. december 1976 om samordning af de garantier, der kræves i medlemsstaterne af de i artikel 58, stk. 2, i Traktaten nævnte selskaber, med det formål at gøre disse garantier lige byrdefulde - den umiddelbare anvendelighed af direktivets artikel 10 og 11 samt artikel 27, stk. 2 - foreneligheden med fællesskabsretten af en national retspraksis vedrørende indskud af fordringer i forbindelse med en forhøjelse af kapitalen i et aktieselskab.
Preliminary ruling - Corte d'Appello di Roma - Interpretation of Artide 3(2) and Section VIII of Annex II of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3247/81 of 9 November 1981 on the financing by the EAGGF of certain intervention measures, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2632/85 - Interpretation of Regulation (EEC) No 136/66 and Regulation (EEC) No 3472/85 - Prices to be taken into account in relations between the intervention agency and the undertaking responsible for storage of intervention olive oil as regards the quantities of oil stolen.
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 8. april 1992.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 8 April 1992.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare spørgsmålene således:
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
"En fordring på et selskab, som indskydes i dette selskab i forbind else med en forhøjelse af kapitalen, skal i overensstemmelse med og som følge af andet direktiv betragtes som et indskud i kontanter, i det omfang der er tale om en klar, likvid og eksigibel fordring; en transaktion, der består i dobbelt betaling, er derfor i overensstemmelse med andet direktiv, såfremt fordringen opfylder disse betingelser. elser.
"The fourth paragraph of Article 3 (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3247/81 of 9 November 1981 and Section VIII of Annex II thereto, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2632/85 of 16 September 1985, must be interpreted as meaning that in drawing up the annual accounts on the financing of intervention measures in relation to storage by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section, the value of lampante virgin olive oil, in intervention storage and subsequently stolen, is to be determined by multiplying the quantities stolen by the purchase price applicable during the marketing year during which the theft occurred or was discovered together with the monthly increases for the type of oil in question with the degree of acidity corresponding to the degree of acidity of the oil stolen or, if that degree of acidity cannot be determined with certainty, corresponding to the lowest degree of acidity of oil stored at the warehouse at which the theft occurred during the marketing year in which the stolen lampante oil was purchased.
Artikel 11, stk. 1, i andet direktiv, sammenholdt med direktivets artikel 10 og artikel 27, stk. 2, skal fortolkes således, at den ikke kan anvendes analogt på andre tilfælde end dem, der er omhandlet i bestemmelsen; i sådanne tilfælde gælder de almindelige regler om om gåelse af loven aut similia stadig, i givet fald efter en fortolkning foretaget af Domstolen.
Preliminary ruling - Cour du travail, Liège - Interpretation of Articles 12 and 46 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 July 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and for members of their families moving within the Community - Old-age pensions and death benefit - Calculation of benefit - Application of the Community and national rules against overlapping.
Den nationale ret, som skal anvende reglerne i andet direktiv, er forpligtet til at fortolke national ret i lyset af direktivets ordlyd og formål."
Mr. Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 8 April 1992.
- 28 - nr. 3821/85 af 20. december 1985 om kontrolapparatet inden for vejtransport - anvendelsesområdet for undtagelsen for drift af et forsyningsnet.
State and that pension overlaps with a pension paid under the legislation of another Member State, Regulation No 1408/71 does not preclude the application to him in its entirety of the legislation of the first Member State, including any national rules against the overlapping of benefits, unless the result is less favourable to him than the application of the rules contained in Article 46 of Regulation No 1408/71, including the limit imposed by Article 46(3).
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 8. april 1992.
In that event, Article 46 must be applied in its entirety, to the exclusion of any national rules against overlapping."
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
Case C-358/89: Extramet Industrie SA ν Council
Den i artikel 4, nr. 6, i forordning (EØF) nr. 3820/85 og i artikel 3, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 3821/85 anførte undtagelse finder alene anvendelse på køretøjer, der benyttes til transport, når denne udelukkende finder sted i forbindelse med fremstilling og distribution af gas samt vedligeholdelse af de hertil nødvendige installa tioner."
I also consider that the Council failed to give proper consideration to the question whether the imposition of a duty was consistent with the need to avoid the distortion of competition in the common market. In so far as it fails to address these matters, the preamble to the contested regulation is in any event insufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article 190 of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet i Tredje Afdeling den 8. april 1992.
(2) the Council should be ordered to pay the costs, including the costs of the application for interim measures and of the objection of inadmissibility, with the exception of the costs of the interveners, who should pay their own costs.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare spørgsmålene således:
Joined Cases C-149/91 and 150/91:
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse - Supreme Court of Ireland - fortolkning af artikel 3 a i forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84 som ændret ved Rådets forord-
Mr. Advocate General Claus Gulmann delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 8 April 1992.
Ved anvendelsen af denne bestemmelse skal de kompetente myndigheder derfor ved beregningen af de opnåede salg eller leverancer skønsmæssigt tage hensyn til den produktion, som kunne have været gennemført på disse dele af bedriften."
The charge is imposed on derived products which are imported whereas corresponding domestic products are not directly subject to the charge; and
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse - Corte d'appello di Roma - fortolkning af artikel 3, stk. 2, og bilag II, pkt. VIII, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3247/81 af 9. november 1981 om finansiering gennem EUGFL af bestemte interventionsforanstaltninger, som ændret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 2632/85 - fortolkning af forordning (EØF) nr. 136/66 og forordning (EØF) nr. 3472/85 - hvilken pris skal lægges til grund i forholdet mellem interventionsorganet og den virksomhed, der står for oplagringen af den opkøbte olivenolie for så vidt angår bortfjernede mængder af olie?
There are no grounds for assuming that a charge such as that at issue in this case falls under Article 92 of the EEC Treaty; furthermore a national court is not competent to decide on a claim that existing State aid which has not been the subject of a decision by the Commission requiring the Member State in question to abolish or alter the aid or new aid which has been introduced in accordance with Article 93(3) of the Treaty should be declared incompatible with Community law."
Passivitetssøgsmål - Kommissionens undladelse af at imødekomme en begæring om, at den fastslår, at de franske toldmyndigheder har tilsidesat deres forpligtelser i forbindelse med import fra Polen af heste til slagtning.
Application for failure to act - Failure to take action in relation to a complaint that the Commission should have declared that the French customs failed to fulfil their duty in relation to the importation of horses for slaughter originating in Poland.
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 91/547/EKSF om støtte fra regionen Sardien til virksomheden Ferriere Acciaierie Sarde.
Annulment of Commission Decision 91/547/ECSC concerning aid granted by the independent region of Sardinia in favour of the Société Ferriere Acciaierie Sarde.
Sag C-103/92: Friedrich Steensen-Feddersen mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Case C-103/92: Friedrich Steensen-Feddersen ν Council and the Commission
Erstatningssøgsmål - Fællesskabets ansvar uden for kontrakt på grund af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84 og Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1371/84 - produktionskvotesystem for mælk - udelukkelse af tidligere modtagere af en ikke-markedsføringspræmie indtil tildeling af en kvota i henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 764/89.
Action for damages - Non-contractual liability of the Community by reason of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 and Commission Regulation No 1371/84 - Milk production quotas - Exclusion of former beneficiaries of a nonmarketing premium until the allocation of a quota under Regulation (EEC) No 764/89.
Se sag C-103/92.
See Case C-103/92.
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om at afslutte proceduren i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, vedrørende støtte fra den græske regering til Heracles General Cement Company, Grækenland.
Annulment of a Commission Decision closing the procedure under Article 93(2) of the EEC Treaty on Greek Government aid to Heracles General Cement Company, Greece.
Se sag C-105/92.
See Case C-105/92.
Sag T-24/92: Langnese-Iglo mod Kommissionen
Τ-24/92: Langnese-Iglo ν Commission
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 25. marts 1992 om fastsættelse af foreløbige foranstaltninger i forbindelse med en procedure i henhold til EØF­Traktatens artikel 85 ­ eksklusivaftaler vedrørende detailsalg af konsumis.
Annulment of Commission Decision of 25 March 1992 adopting protective measures in relation to proceedings under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty -
Tjenestemandssag.
Staff Case
Tjenestemandssag.
Colette Zaoui ν Council
Se sag T­24/92.
See Case T-24/92
Udgivet af Informationstjenesten ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol L­2925 Luxembourg.
Published by the Information service of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, L-2925 Luxembourg.
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS * Ugen 4.- 8. maj 1992 Nr. 13/92
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES1 Week of 4 to 8 May 1992 No 13/92 SUMMARY
DOMMENE OG DE FREMSATTE FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE OFFENTLIGGØRES SENERE I -SAMLING AF AFGØRELSER", SOM ER ENESTE GYLDIGE UDGAVE.
HOWEVER, ONLY THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS PUBLISHED LATER IN THE REPORTS OF CASES BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IS AUTHENTIC.
(Præjudiciel) "Afgifter - efteropkrævningsansættelse af omsætningsafgift - sjette momsdirektiv" (Tredje Afdeling)
(Taxation ­ Adjustment of turnover tax ­ Sixth Directive on VAT) (Preliminary ruling) (Third Chamber)
Ved dom af 19. december 1990 indgået til Domstolen den 23. januar 1991 havde Nederlandenes Hoge Raad stillet tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 5, stk. 6 og artikel IIA, i Rådets sjette momsdirektiv.
By judgment of 19 December 1990, which was received at the Court on 23 January 1991, the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands) referred for a preliminary ruling three questions concerning the interpretation of Articles 5(6) and IIA of the Sixth Council Directive.
De Jong, som var entreprenør, købte med fritagelse for omsætningsafgift en grund, hvoraf han videresolgte halvdelen til en tredjemand uden at fakturere ham denne afgift.
Mr de Jong, a building contractor, purchased a plot of land in respect of which he did not pay turnover tax. He sold approximately half of the land to a third party and did not charge turnover tax on the sale.