natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7.11.1990 En stats traktatbrud - manglende gennemfrirelse af Rådets direktiv 85/339/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om emballager til flydende levnedsmidler. Generaladvokat : CO. Lenz. Processprog : fransk.
Zuckerfabrik Süderdithmarschen ν Hauptzollamt Itzehoe -8 November 1990 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) Finanzgericht Hamburg Interpretation of Article 189 of the EEC Treaty - Powers of national courts to suspend, by way of interim measure, the operation of an administrative measure based on a regulation - Validity of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1914/87 of 2 July 1987 introducing a special elimination levy in the sugar sector for the 1986/87 marketing year.
7.11.1990 En stats traktatbrud - artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 85/339/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om emballager til flydende levnedsmidler - manglende underretning af Kommissionen om planer for begrænsning af emballager til flydende levnedsmidler. Generaladvokat : CO. Lenz. Processprog : fransk.
Zuckerfabrik Soest ν Hauptzollamt Paderborn - 8 November 1990 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) Finanzgericht Düsseldorf Validity of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1914/87 of 2 July 1987 introducing a special elimination levy in the sugar sector for the 1987/87 marketing year Advocate General: CO.
7.11.1990 Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 26. juni 1989 om ændring af Kommissionens beslutning 88/630/EØF af 29. november 1988 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1986, der er finansieret af EUGFL -udgifter til farvning af korn. Generaladvokat : J. Mischo. Processprog : italiensk.
The Queen (ex parte Gustaff Desiderius Antonissen) ν Immigration Appeal Tribunal - 8 November 1990 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division Interpretation of Article 48 of the EEC Treaty and Directive 64/221/EEC and 68/360/EEC - Limitation in time of the right of residence of a Community national seeking employment.
Sag C-198/89 Kommissionen mod Grækenland
Advocate General: W. Van Gerven Language of the case: French
Sag C-32/89 Grækenland mod Kommissionen
Case C-330/89
8.11.1990 Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 88/630/EØF af 29. november 1988 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1986, der er finansieret af EUGFL, Garantisektionen. Generaladvokat : F.G. Jacobs.
Commission ν Belgium - 7 November 1990 Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Article 3 of Council Directive 85/339/EEC of 27 June 1985 on containers of liquids for human consumption - Failure to inform the Commission of programmes for reducing containers of liquids for human consumption.
Processprog : græsk.
Lenz Language of the case: French
Tjenestemandssag.
Case C-209/89
Sag C­298/90 Kommissionen mod Italien En stats traktatbrud ­ manglende gennemfrirelse i national ret af Rådets direktiv 86/457/EØF af 15. september 1986 om en særlig uddannelse til alment praktiserende læge. Processprog : italiensk.
Italy ν Commission - 7 November 1990 Application for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 26 June 1989 amending Decision 88/630/EEC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1986 of the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund - Cost of colouring cereals.
Processprog : tysk.
Case C-154/89
Sag C­300/90 Kommissionen mod Belgien En stats traktatbrud ­ EØF­Traktatens artikler 48 og 59 ­ artikel 7, stk. 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1612/68 af 15. oktober 1968 om arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed inden for Fællesskabet ­ fradrag i den skattepligtige indkomst for bidrag til supple­rende forsikringer. Processprog : fransk.
Commission ν France - 8 November 1990 Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Article 59 of the EEC Treaty - Freedom to provide services with regard to tourist guides - Rules making the pursuit of the activity of tourist guide travelling with a group of tourists from a Member State other than France subject to possession of a licence which presupposes acquisition of a specific qualification generally awarded upon the passing of an examination. Advocate General: CO.
Sag C­301/90 Kommissionen mod Rådet
Case C-180/89
Annullation af Rådets forordning (EURATOM, EKSF, EØF) nr. 2258/90 af 27. juli 1990 om korrigering af vederlag og pensioner til tjenestemænd og Øvrige ansatte i De Europæiske Fællesskaber og om tilpasning af justeringskoefficienterne for vederlag og pensio­ner, i det omfang der ikke er fastsat en særlig justeringskoef­ficient for München. Processprog : fransk.
Commission ν Italy - 8 November 1990 (See Case C-154/89) Advocate General: C.O. Lenz Language of the case: Italian
Sag C­303/90 Frankrig mod Kommissionen Annullation på grund af manglende kompetence af dokumentet "Adfærdskodeks med henblik på anvendelse af artikel 23, stk. 1, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4253/88 angående uregelmæssigheder og gennemførelse af et system til udveksling af oplysninger om uregelmæssigheder" (offentliggjort i Tidende C 200 af 9. august 1990, ref.nr. 90/C 200/03). Processprog : fransk.
Hellenic Republic ν Commission - 8 November 1990 Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 88/630/EEC of 29 November 1988 on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1986 of the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund.
Processprog : græsk.
Case T-140/89: Staff case
Sag C-310/90 Nationale Raad van de Orde van Architecten mod U. Egle Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Belgiens Hof van Cassatie.
Commission ν Italy Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Failure to implement under national law Council Directive 86/457/EEC of 15 September 1986 on specific training in general medicine. Language of the case: Italian
Fortolkning af artikel 4, stk. 1, litra a), i Rådets direktiv 85/384/EØF af 10. juni 1985 om gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser, certifikater og andre kvalifikationsbeviser inden for arkitekturområdet, herunder om foranstaltninger, som skal lette den faktiske udøvelse af retten til etablering og fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser. Processprog : nederlandsk.
Application for the annulment of Council Regulation (EURATOM, ECSC, EEC) No. 2258/90 adjusting the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the weightings applied thereto, in so far as it does not fix a specific weighting allowance for Munich. Language of the case: French
Sag C-311/90 J. Hierl mod Hauptzollamt Regensburg Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Finanzgericht München.
19 - a frontier worker during a period of unemployment in respect of which benefit was paid by the institution in the State of residence. Language of the case: French
Processprog : tysk.
Case C-305/90
Sag C-312/90 Spanien mod Kommissionen Annullation af beslutningen om en procedure i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, på en støtte, som ikke er meddelt, men som Spanien antages at have ydet den private koncern CENEMESA, CONELEC og CADENESA. Processprog : spansk.
K.-H. List ν Council and Commission Action for damages - Non-contractual liability of the Community for Council Regulation (EEC) No. 857/84 and Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 1371/84 - System of milk production quotas - Exclusion of former beneficiaries of a non-marketing premium until the assignment of a quota under Regulation (EEC) No. 764/89. Language of the case: German
B. Retten i Første Instans
Language of the case: French
Sag T-46/90 Tjenestemandssag.
Language of the case: German
Sag T-47/90 Tjenestemandssag.
Language of the case: Dutch
Udgivet af Informationstjenesten ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol, L-2925 Luxembourg.
Regulation (EEC) No. 804/68 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products - Withdrawal of the same percentage of each reference quantity - No rules in favour of small family holdings. Language of the case: German
Redaktionen sluttet den 12. november 1990.
Language of the case: Spanish
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS *)
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES*
Sag C-269/89
I - JUDGMENTS page
Sag C-331/88 ·. FEDESA m.fl. mod Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Landbrug Sag C-370/88
Case C-269/89 Criminal proceedings against Bonfait BV Free movement of goods Case C-216/89 B. Reibold ν Bundesanstalt für Arbeit Free movement of persons Case C-106/89 Marleasing ν La Comercial Internacional de Alimentación Company law Case C-331/88 The Queen ν Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Minister of Health ex parte FEDESA and Others Agriculture Case C-370/88 Procurator Fiscal ν A. Marshall Fisheries
(Præjudiciel) "Fri bevægelighed for personer ­ social sikring af vandrende arbejdstagere ­forordning nr. 1408/71, artikel 71, stk. 1, litra b), ii) ­ begrebet 'bosat'" (Tredje Afdeling)
Criminal Proceedings against Bonfait BV - 13.11.1990 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) (Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - Meat and meat products - Prepared meat products) (First Chamber)
Ved kendelse af 27. april 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 10. juli s.a., havde Bundessozialgericht, 11. Afdeling, forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 71, stk. 1, litra b), ii), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
By an interlocutory judgment of 29 June 1989, which was received at the Court on 5 September 1989, the Magistrate dealing with commercial cases on the Arrondissementsrechtbank, Almelo, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 30 of the EEC Treaty.
Spørgsmålet var blevet rejst under en sag anlagt af Beate Reibold mod Bundes­anstalt für Arbeit, som ved beregningen af ydelser ved arbejdsløshed, som Reibold fremsatte krav om, havde nægtet at medregne den periode på 21 måneder, hvor hun havde været beskæftiget som lektor ved et universitet i Det Forenede Kongerige, med den begrundelse, at denne beskæftigelse ikke var omfattet af en obligatorisk soci alsi k ringsordning.
Those questions arose in criminal proceedings instituted against Bonfait BV for infringing Netherlands regulations which reserve the appellation "prepared meat products" to products not exceeding the ratio of four in the relationship of water to non-fat organic matter by selling and delivering as "prepared meat products" certain products which it had imported from the Federal Republic of Germany where they are lawfully marketed as prepared meat products and whose water content in relation to the content of non-fat organic matter was 4.7 and 4.5.
"Ved afgørelsen af, om artikel 71, stk. 1, litra b), ii), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdri­vende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af 2. juni 1983, kan finde anvendelse, skal der tages hensyn til bopælens varighed og faste karakter forud for den pågældende flytning, fraværets varighed og formål, karakteren af beskæftigelsen i den anden medlems­stat samt den pågældendes hensigter, som de fremgår af sagens omstæn­digheder; de af den forelæggende ret anførte faktiske omstændigheder er af en sådan art, at de kan tages i betragtning ved anvendelsen af disse kriterier."
"Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty preclude the application to products imported from another Member State of national rules which reserve the appellation "prepared meat products" for products containing water and non-fat organic matter in a ratio which does not exceed a certain limit."
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 27. juni
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 25 September 1990.
Generaladvokaten foreslog at besvare det præjudicielle spørgsmål således: "Artikel 71, stk. 1, litra b), ii), i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 skal for­tolkes således, at bestemmelsen finder anvendelse på en arbejdstager, der accepterer en beskæftigelse i en anden medlemsstat af en varighed af ca. 2 år, når tilbuddet om beskæftigelse udgør et led i et udvekslingsprogram mellem universiteter, når varigheden af beskæftigelsen ligger inden for programmets normale rammer, og når den pågældendes beskæftigelse afbrydes af længere ferieperioder, som arbejdstageren tilbringer i den bolig, han har bevaret i sin hjemstat."
He proposed that the Court should hold that: "The application to products imported from another Member State of national rules prohibiting the marketing under the appellation of prepared meat products preparations exceeding a maximum ratio between the moisture content and the content of non-fat organic matter is precluded by Article 30 of the EEC Treaty where those products are, in compliance with the conditions laid down by the rules of the exporting State for the use of an appellation relating to prepared meat products, lawfully marketed there under such appellation".
(Præjudiciel) "Selskabsret ­ direktiv 68/151/EØF ­ artikel 11 ­ fortolkning i overensstem­melse med national ret" (Sjette Afdeling)
By an order of 27 April 1989, which was received at the Court on 10 July 1989, the Eleventh Chamber of the Bundessozialgericht [Federal Social Court] referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 71 (1) (b) (ii) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71.
Ved kendelse af 13. marts 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 3. april 1989, havde Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción nr. 1, Oviedo, forelagt et præjudi­cielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 11 i Rådets direktiv 68/151/EØF.
That question arose in proceedings between Mrs Reibold and BAA concerning the refusal by BAA to take into account, for the purpose of calculating unemployment benefit due to Mrs Reibold, the employment which she carried on for 21 months as a lecturer in a United Kingdom University, on the ground that that employment was not subject to compulsory social insurance.
Om dette spørgsmål henviste Domstolen først til sin faste praksis, hvorefter et direktiv ikke i sig selv kan skabe forpligtelser for private, og bestemmel­serne i et direktiv følgelig ikke som sådan kan påberåbes over for private.
"For the purposes of the application of Article 71 (1) (b) (ii) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, account must be taken of how long the person concerned was resident before moving and of the degree to which that period of residence was interrupted, the length and purpose of his absence, the nature of the employment found in the other Member State and the intention of the person concerned as revealed by all the circumstances; the circumstances of fact referred to by the national court are among those which may be taken into account for the purpose of applying those criteria."
Med hensyn til fortolkningen af direktivets artikel 11, navnlig stk. 2, litra b), bemærkede Domstolen, at direktivets formål, således som det fremgår af Præamblen, er at begrænse ugyldighedsgrundene samt en ugyldighedsafgørelses tilbagevirkende gyldighed. Alle ugyldighedsgrundene i direktivets artikel 11 skal derfor fortolkes snævert.
He proposed that the Court should rule that: "Article 71 (1) (b) (ii) of Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 must be interpreted as meaning that it is applicable when a worker accepts employment in another Member State for a period of about two years, and that employment is obtained for that person in the context of a programme of university exchanges, when its
- 5 - stiftet som følge af den virksomhed, som det faktisk driver, f.eks. aktiviteter, der indebærer besvigelse af stifternes kreditorer.
- 5 - duration is limited from the outset in the normal context of such a programme and when the employment of the person concerned is interrupted by long periods of holidays which the worker spends in accommodation retained in the State of origin."
Domstolen besvarede det forelagte spørgsmål således:
Case C-106/89: Marl easing SA ν La Comercial Internacional de Alimentación SA - 13.11.1990 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) (Company law - Directive 68/151/EEC - Article 11 - Consistent interpretation of national law) (Sixth Chamber)
"En national domstol, der behandler en sag, der henhører under anvendelsesområdet for Rådets direktiv 68/151/EØF af 9. marts 1968 - om samordning af de garantier, som kræves i medlemsstaterne af de i Traktatens artikel 58, stk. 2, nævnte selskaber til beskyttelse af såvel selskabs deltagernes som tredjemands interesser, med det formål at gøre disse garantier lige byrdefulde - skal fortolke de nationale retsforskrifter i lyset af direktivets ordlyd og formål; et aktieselskab kan således ikke erklæres ugyldigt stiftet på grund af et andet forhold end de i direktivets artikel 11 nævnte."
By an order of 13 March 1989, which was received at the Court on 3 April 1989, the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción [Court of First Instance and Examining Magistrate's Court], Oviedo, asked the Court to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 11 of Council Directive 68/151/EEC.
(Præjudiciel) "Landbrug - stoffer med hormonal virkning - gyldigheden af direktiv 88/146" (Femte Afdeling)
In that connexion it was appropriate to recall the consistent caselaw of the Court according to which a directive could not by itself create obligations for an individual and, accordingly, its provisions could not be relied on as such against such a person.
Ved kendelse af 20. september 1988, indgået til Domstolen den 14. november s.a., havde High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, forelagt Domstolen en række præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende gyldigheden af Rådets direktiv 88/146/EØF.
However, the Court had also held that it followed from the obligation on Member States to take all measures appropriate to ensure the performance of their obligation to achieve the result provided for in directives, that
- 6 - qer, der driver virksomhed i hele Europa og i De Forenede Stater, samt en dyrLæge og en landbruger - havde ved den nationale ret anfægtet den nationale retsforskrift, hvorved direktivet delvis var blevet gennemført, under henvisning til at direktivet var ugyldigt.
6 - in applying national law, whether it was a case of provisions prior to or subsequent to the directive, the national court called on to interpret it was required to do so as far as possible in the light of the wording and purpose of the directive in order to achieve the result sought by the directive, and thus to comply with the third paragraph of Article 189 of the Treaty.
Det i sagen omhandlede direktiv blev vedtaget den 7. marts 1988 og meddelt medlemsstaterne den 11. marts s.a.
It followed therefrom that each ground of nullity provided for in Article 11 of the directive had to be strictly interpreted.
Direktivet havde samme indhold - og gav medlemsstaterne samme frist for gennemførelsen - som Rådets direktiv 85/649/EØF af 31. december 1985 om forbud mod anvendelse af visse stoffter med hormonal virkning inden for husdyravl.
In those circumstances, the words "the objects of the company" had to be construed as referring to the objects of the company, as set out in the deed of incorporation or the articles.
Sidstnævnte direktiv blev annulleret ved Domstolens dom af 23. februar 1988 i sagen Det Forenede Kongerige mod Rådet (sag 68/86, Sml. s. 855) med den begrundelse, at Rådet havde tilsidesat en væsentlig formforskrift ved ikke at iagttage proceduren i artikel 6, stk. 1, i Rådets forretningsorden.
The nullity of a company could not be declared therefore on the basis of the activities which it actually carried on, such as for example defrauding the founders' creditors.
Domstolen bemærkede, at anbringendet om, at der forelå videnskabelige beviser for, at de i sagen omhandlede fem hormoner er uskadelige, ikke kunne tages til falge. Domstolen fandt det tilstrækkeligt at konstatere, at Rådet i betragtning af den forskellige bedømmelse, som medlemsstaternes nationale myndigheder Havde anlagt, og som afspejledes i de divergerende nationale lovgivninger på området, havde holdt sig inden for rammerne af sit skøn, da det valgte den løsning at forbyde de pågældende hormoner og dermed tog hensyn til de betænkeligheder, som Europa-Parlamentet, Det Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg og flere forbrugerorganisationer havde givet udtryk for.
"A national court called on to determine a dispute in a matter falling within the sphere of application of Council Directive 57/151/EEC of 9 March 1968 on co-ordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the Community, is obliged to interpret its national law in the light of the wording and purpose of that directive in order to prevent the nullity of a limited liability company from being declared on a ground other than those listed in Article 11 thereof."
Anbringendet om tilsidesættelse af proportionalitetsprincippet
He proposed that the Court should give the following reply:
Herom bemærkede Domstolen, at det i sagen omhandlede forbud ikke kunne anses for en foranstaltning, der var åbenbart uegnet til opfyldelse af de erklærede formål.
Article 11 of Council Directive 68/151/EEC of 9 March 1968 cannot be relied on as such against an individual.
Endvidere ville enhver ordning, hvorefter nogle stoffer var tilladt, kræve bekostelige kontrolforanstaltninger, hvis effektivitet man ikke ville have nogen garanti for.
However, it is for the national court to interpret its national legislation in the light of the wording and the aim of that provision of the directive and, where nullity is declared, in the light of Article 12 of that directive.
Endelig fremhævede Domstolen, at de tilstræbte formål var af væsentlig betydning, og at dette kunne begrunde de negative Økonomiske følger for visse erhvervsdrivende, som endog for nogles vedkommende var af betydeligt omfang.
The phrase "the objects of the company" in Article 11 (2) (b) of Directive 68/151/EEC must be interpreted as meaning the company's objects as described in the disclosed instrument of constitution or statutes of the company or as expressed in the activity actually carried on by the company from its inception."
Herom fandt Domstolen det tilstrækkeligt at fastslå, at en retsakt, der harmoniserer visse af medlemsstaternes retsforskrifter og derigennem samordner regler, der tidligere var indbyrdes afvigende, uvægerligt vil have forskellige virkninger alt efter, hvorledes de nationale lovgivninger tidligere var udformet. Når EF-reglen gælder ens for alle medlemsstaterne, sådan som det var tilfældet i sagen, kunne der ikke siges at foreligge en forskelsbehandling.
Case C-331/88: The Queen ν the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Secretary of State for Health, ex parte FEDESA and Others - 13.11.1990 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) (Agriculture - Substances having a hormonal action - Validity of Directive 88/146) (Fifth Chamber)
Herom udtalte Domstolen for det første, at det var oplyst, at der i forbindelse med direktivets vedtagelse var blevet taget hensyn til muligheden for at nedbringe overskudsproduktionen af kød.
By an order of 20 September 1988, which was received at the Court on 14 November 1988, the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling several questions relating to the validity of Council Directive 88/146/EEC.