natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det bemærkes hertil, at ifølge Domstolens praksis skal det tab, hvoraf der er nedlagt påstand om erstatning, være faktisk og reelt. I den foreliggende sag afhænger spørgsmålet, om der faktisk er lidt et sådant tab, som sagsøgeren påstår at have lidt, imidlertid af, at det først fastslås, at sagsøgeren er berettiget til fællesskabsfinansiering, hvilket imidlertid kun
The conditions laid down in Article 4(1), Formula C(a)(l), of Regulation (EEC) No. 570/88, as subsequently amended, for grant of the aid must be regarded as being cumulative, with the result that aid may not be granted under that provision for butter incorporated in a product which does not satisfy the condition laid down in Article 4(1), Formula C(a)(l)(i), that flour should form at least 52% of its content.'
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 17. maj 1995.
By omitting to adopt within the period prescribed the measures necessary to implement Council Directive 92/44/EEC of 5 June 1992 on the application of open network provision to leased lines, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty.
Sag C-341/93 Danværn Production A/S / Schuhfabriken Otterbeck GmbH & Co. Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
The Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs.'
·— Bestemmelsen i artikel 6, nr. 3, i Bruxelleskonventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser
Annulment of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 207/93 defining the content of Annex Vito Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslat; til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 17. mai 1995.
Preliminary ruling - Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Interpretation ofArtide 5(3) of the Brussels Convention Definition of 'place where the harmful event occurred' — Financial damage
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
Advocate General Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 18 May 1995.
Præjudiciel — Luxembourgs Conseil d'État — fortolkning af EØF-traktatens artikel 67 og 71 — nationale regler om sociale ydelser til bolig — rentetilskud — lån optaget i et godkendt kreditinstitut i den pågældende medlemsstat
Joined Cases C-70/94 and C-83/94 Firma Fritz Werner Industrie-Ausrüstungen GmbH ν République Fédérale d'Allemagne et Criminal proceedings against Peter Leifer, Reinhold Otto Krauskopf and Otto Holzer
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 17. maj 1995.
Preliminary ruling Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Interpretation of Article 113 of the EC Treaty -Provision of national law imposing a licence requirementfor the export of certain goods — Refusal in the interest of public security Risk of disrupting the external relations of the Member State concerned — Export ofvacuum induction furnaces to Libya
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 18 May 1995.
·— Artikel 4, nr. 1, formel A, litra a), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 570/88 af 16. februar 1988 om salg af smør til nedsat pris og ydelse af støtte for smør og koncentreret smør til fremstilling af konditorvarer, konsumis og andre levnedsmidler, som ændret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 949/88, nr. 2951/88, nr. 352/89, nr. 1048/89, nr. 1157/91 og 2675/91 skal fortolkes således, at der ikke kan gives støtte til smør iblandet i et produkt, der består af dybfrossen, bageklar smørmørdej (smørmørdejsstængcr), der er udformet som kiks og er bestemt til at bages for første gang af forbrugeren.
'Article 113 of the Treaty, as implemented by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2603/69, does not preclude a Member State from requiring a licence for the export to a non-member State of a product capable of being used for military purposes or the refusal of such a licence on the ground that refusal was necessary to protect the security of the Member State owing to the risk of a serious disruption of its external relations.'
·— EØF-traktatens artikel 59 skal fortolkes således, at en medlemsstat ikke kan afslå at yde en låntager statsligt tilskud til renter på lån til opførelse, erhvervelse eller forbedring af bolig under henvisning til, at lånet er optaget i et kreditinstitut, der ikke er etableret i den pågældende medlemsstat, når sådant tilskud ydes i tilfælde, hvor lån under i øvrigt tilsvarende omstændigheder er optaget i et kreditinstitut, der er etableret i den pågældende medlemsstat.
National rules restricting exports to a non-member State of products capable of being used for military purposes in order to prevent a substantial disturbance of the peaceful coexistence of nations or to prevent the external relations of the Member State concerned from being seriously disrupted are justified on the basis of Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2603/69 in so far as those aims are linked to the external security of the Member State concerned, or in so far as the restrictions serve to protect the health and life of humans, as in cases where the country of destination is at war.
til artikel 5, stk 4, til nævnteforordning — Europa-Parlamentets beføjelser
National rules (a) imposing on the applicant the whole burden of proving that the goods are for civil use, (b) allowing for the refusal of an export licence if the goods are objectively suitable for military use, and (c) imposing penalties, including imprisonment, arc not disproportionate where the external security of the Member State concerned or the health and life of humans are at stake.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 18. maj 1995.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2603/69 is directly applicable and its provisions can be invoked in the courts of the Member States.'
— De i artikel 4, nr. 3, formel C, litra a), nr. 1, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 570/88 med senere ændringer anførte betingelser for at kunne opnå støtte må anses for at være kumulative, således at der ikke efter denne bestemmelse kan ydes støtte til smør, som er blandet i et produkt, der ikke opfylder betingelsen i artikel 4, nr. 3, formel C, litra a), nr. 1, i), om et melindhold på mindst 51 %.«
Preliminary ruling Monomeles Dioikitiko Protodikeio Rodou -Interpretation of Community law —Articles 12, 13,16 and 17 of the EEC Treaty and Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment Ad valorem duty levied by a municipal council on goods from other parts of the same State
·— Den Hellenske Republik har tilsidesat de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i medfør af EF-traktaten, ved ikke inden udløbet af den fastsatte frist at have truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 92/44/EØF af 5. juni 1992 om etablering af ONP-vilkår for faste kredsløb.
The provisions of the EC Treaty concerning charges having an effect equivalent to customs duties on imports may not be relied on in support of applications for the refund of a tax such as the tax on consumption paid on goods from other parts of the same Member State before 9 August 1994, except by those persons who have prior to that date brought legal proceedings or made an equivalent claim challenging the lax in question."'
Forenede sager C-70/94 og C-83/94 Fritz Werner Industrie-Ausrüstungen GmbH / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og straffesag mod Peter Leifer, Reinhold Otto Krauskopf og Otto Hölzer
Preliminary ruling - Cour de Cassation Française - Interpretation of Articles 9, 12, 13 and 16 of the EEC Treaty - Frontier-crossing charge intended to offset the costs borne by aprivate undertakingas a result of the
ved retsinstanserse i kan påberåbes medlemsstaterne.« udlandet — eksport af vakuum-mduktionsovne til Libyen
public duties performed by the customs service and the veterinary service — Charge arisingfrom an agreement between the private undertaking and its clients
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 18. maj 1995.
Advocate General La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 18 May 1995.
Forenede sager C-485/93 og C-486/93 Maria Simitzi / Kos Kommune
He proposed that the court should reply as follows:
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse i Werner-sagen:
None the less, in so far as they concern a public service performed for the general good, the costs connected to the operation of the customs and veterinary services must be borne in their entirety by the State and cannot, therefore, be charged to traders.
Præjudiciel — Monomeles Diikitiko Protodikio Rodou —fortolkning affællesskabsretten — artikel 12, 13, 16, 17 i EØF-traktatens og direktiv 77/388/EØF: Rådets sjette direktiv om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag — værdiafgift opkrævet af et lokalt organ af varer fra et andet område i den samme medlemsstat
Consequently, State action the result of which is in any case to oblige private persons to bear such costs, even if only by means of a financial payment provided for by a private agreement, as regards the transport of goods crossing the frontiers of a Member State, is contrary to Article 3(c), Article 5, second paragraph, and Articles 9, 12, 13 and 16 of the Treaty."'
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. maj 1995.
Preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía — Interpretation of Article 25 of the Act of Accession of Spain and Protocol 2 - Taxation system applicable to Ceuta and Melilla — Charge levied by a municipal council on goods imported from other parts of national territory and from the other Member States Exemption of local production (very small) in most cases
I Leifer-sagen har han foreslået Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 18 May 1995.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse af de forelagte spørgsmål:
He was of the opinion that the Court should reply as follows:
»1) Nationale regler om restriktioner i udførslen til tredjelande af varer, der kan anvendes til militære formål, med henblik på at hindre en alvorlig forstyrrelse af den fredelige sameksistens mellem nationerne eller at forhindre, at den pågældende medlemsstats forbindelser med udlandet bliver væsentligt forstyrret, er berettigede i henhold til artikel 11 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2603/69 i det omfang, disse hensyn vedrører den pågældende medlemsstats sikkerhed udadtil eller restriktionerne har til formål at beskytte menneskers liv og sundhed, hvilket er tilfældet, når modtagerstaten er i krig.
Article 25 of and Protocol 2 to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Spain, read in conjunction with Article 9 et seq. of the EC Treaty, preclude the levying of a charge on goods imported from the other Member States and on domestic goods entering Ceuta for consumption, where it is established that the revenue from that charge is intended to finance activities that specifically benefit local production, in such a way as wholly to offset the burden imposed on local production on account of the levying of the charge. That charge is to be categorized as discriminatory internal taxation within the meaning of Article 95 of the Treaty where the revenue is intended to finance activities that offset only in part the burden imposed on taxable local products on account of the levying of the charge.
2) Eksportrestriktionerne og de straffetlige sanktioner, der er fastsat for udførsel uden tilladelse, skal stå i et rimeligt forhold til de tilstræbte mål. Nationale bestemmelser, der a) pålægger ansøgeren den fulde bevisbyrde for, at varerne skal anvendes til civile formål, b) nægter udførselstilladelse på grund af varernes objektive egnethed til militær anvendelse, og c) pålægger straf, herunder frihedsstraf, er ikke i strid med proportionalitetsprincippet, når der er fare for den pågældende medlemsstats sikkerhed udadtil eller menneskers liv og sundhed.
Article 25 of and Protocol 2 to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Spain, read in conjunction with Article 95 of the EC Treaty, preclude the levying of a charge on goods imported from the other Member States and on domestic products entering Ceuta for consumption, in so far as it is applied to imported products which are similar to or competing with products originating in Ceuta which are wholly or partly exempt from the charge on account of their local origin.'
inden denne dato har anlagt sag med påstand derom eller indgivet en dertil svarende klage over den pågældende afgift.«
This bulletin is issued by the Court's Information Service (L-2925 Luxembourg) to provide rapid information on the work or the Court.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
This information may be reproduced provided that the source is acknowledged.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. maj 1995.
Original version: French Completed on 19.05.1995 Catalogue No: DX-AC-95-014-EN-C
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND COURT OF
DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS
FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Ugen 22.-26. maj 1995
22 to 26 May 1995
Domstolens rapport om visse aspekter ved anvendelsen af traktaten om Den Europæiske Union Indlæg fra Retten i Første Instans i forbindelse med regeringskonferencen 19%
Report of the Court of Justice on Certain Aspects of the Application of the Treaty on European Union - Contribution of the Court of First Instance for the Purposes of the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference
- Rettens indlæg
Contribution of the Court of First Instance
Domstolens rapport om visse aspekter ved anvendelsen af traktaten om Den Europæiske Union
Report of the Court of Justice on Certain Aspects of the Application of the Treaty on European Union
Da Det Europæiske Råd under mødet på Korfu den 24.-25. juni 1994 besluttede at nedsætte en arbejdsgruppe til at forberede regeringskonferencen i 1996 — der skal afholdes i henhold til artikel N, stk. 2, i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union — blev institutionerne opfordret til, inden arbejdsgruppen den 1. juni 1995 indleder sit arbejde, at udarbejde rapporter om, hvorledes traktaten om Den Europæiske Union fungerer.
The European Council, meeting at Corfu on 24 and 25 June 1994, decided to set up a Study Group to prepare for the work of the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference provided for under Article N(2) of the Treaty on European Union. It invited the institutions, before the Study Group begins its work on 1 June 1995, to draw up reports on the operation of the Treaty on European Union.
Ved udarbejdelsen af sin rapport har Domstolen ønsket at give et nyttigt bidrag til gruppens arbejde, men har samtidig måttet udvise den tilbageholdenhed, som dens stilling som judiciel institution kræver.
In responding to that request, the Court of Justice must reconcile its concern to provide a useful contribution to the work of the Group with the duty of discretion incumbent upon it as a judicial institution.
Efter den revisionsprocedure, som er fastlagt i traktaterne, påhviler det i det væsentlige medlemsstaterne at udarbejde og godkende de ændringer, som kravene til en Union i konstant udvikling nødvendiggør.
Under the revision procedure laid down by the Treaties, it is essentially the Member States who have the task of drawing up and approving such amendments as are deemed necessary to meet the requirements of a Union which is, necessarily, always in a state of evolution.
Domstolens opgave er i denne forbindelse at tilkendegive, hvad der er nødvendigt for, at Unionens judicielle system fortsat kan udføre sine opgaver på en hensigtsmæssig måde.
In that context, the Court's duty is to indicate what is needed, or indeed indispensable, to allow the judicial system of the Union to continue carrying out its task effectively.
Det er således af største betydning, at Unionen, som bygger på retsstatsprincippet, har et domstolssystem, som kan værne om lov og ret.
It is of the utmost importance that the Union, based on the principle of the rule of law, should possess a system of courts capable of ensuring that that rule is observed.
Domstolens rapport vedrører derfor i det væsentlige domstolssystemet, og andre spørgsmål vil kun blive berørt, såfremt de kan have betydning for den måde, hvorpå dette system fungerer.
This report will therefore concentrate on the judicial system and will touch on other aspects only in so far as they may have implications for its operation.
Domstolen vil først gennemgå retsinstansernes rolle inden for Unionen. Den vil derefter gøre status over anvendelsen af visse bestemmelser i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union, og endelig vil den fremsætte sine bemærkninger til de ændringsforslag, som vedrører domstolssystemet, eller som kan have betydning herfor.
After first outlining the role of the judicature within the framework of the Union, the Court's report will deal with the application of certain provisions of the Treaty on European Union, and submit observations on prospective amendments affecting or likely to have repercussions on the judicial system.
I - RETSINSTANSERNES OPGAVE I DEN EUROPÆISKE UNION
I - THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
De Europæiske Fællesskaber er retsfællesskaber, og Unionen, som er baseret herpå, er af samme karakter.
The Union, like the European Communities on which it is founded, is governed by the rule of law.
Selve forudsætningen for, at Unionen kan bestå, er, at medlemsstaterne, institutionerne og borgerne anerkender, at de retsregler, den fastsætter, er bindende.
Its very existence is conditional on recognition by the Member States, by the institutions and by individuals of the binding nature of its rules.
Domstolen, som skal værne om lov og ret ved fortolkningen og anvendelsen af traktaterne, skal sikre, at retsakterne er lovlige, og at de fælles regler anvendes ensartet.
The Court of Justice, which is charged with ensuring that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed, is responsible for monitoring the legality of acts and the uniform application of the common rules.
Domstolen skal således træffe afgørelse i direkte søgsmål, som anlægges af medlemsstaterne, institutionerne eller borgerne, have et tæt samarbejde med de nationale retsinstanser som led i den præjudicielle forelæggelsesprocedure og skal afgive udtalelse vedrørende visse aftaler, som Fællesskaberne påtænker at indgå.
It is called on to rule on direct actions brought by the Member States, by the institutions and by individuals; to maintain close cooperation with national courts and tribunals through the preliminary ruling procedure; and to give opinions on certain agreements envisaged by the Communities.
Domstolen har således opgaver, som i medlemsstaternes retsordner efter omstændighederne varetages af forfatningsdomstole, forvaltningsdomstole og de almindelige domstole.
The Court thus carries out tasks which, in the legal systems of the Member States, are those of the constitutional courts, the courts of general jurisdiction or the administrative courts or tribunals, as the case may be.
Som forfatningsdomstol tager Domstolen stilling til kompetencefordelingen mellem Fællesskaberne og medlemsstaterne og til Fællesskabernes kompetence i forhold til de andre samarbejdsformer, der findes inden for Unionens rammer, samt tager generelt stilling til rækkevidden af de traktatbestemmelser, hvis overholdelse den skal sikre.
In its constitutional role, the Court rules on the respective powers of the Communities and of the Member States, and on those of the Communities in relation to other forms of cooperation within the framework of the Union and, generally, determines the scope of the provisions of the Treaties whose observance it is its duty to ensure.
Domstolen sikrer opretholdelsen af kompetencefordelingen mellem institutionerne og medvirker således til, at den institutionelle ligevægt bevares.
It ensures that the delimitation of powers between the institutions is safeguarded, thereby helping to maintain the institutional balance.
Domstolen efterprøver, om institutionerne og medlemsstaterne, når deres virke ligger inden for fællesskabsrettens anvendelsesområde, respekterer grundrettighederne og overholder de almindelige retsgrundsætninger.
It examines whether fundamental rights and general principles of law have been observed by the institutions, and by the Member States when their actions fall within the scope of Community law.
Domstolen tager stilling til forholdet mellem fællesskabsretten og national ret og til medlemsstaternes og fællesskabsinstitutionernes gensidige forpligtelser.
It rules on the relationship between Community law and national law and on the reciprocal obligations between the Member States and the Community institutions.
Endelig kan Domstolen blive anmodet om at tage stilling til, om internationale forpligtelser, som Fællesskaberne påtænker at påtage sig, er forenelige med traktaterne.
Finally, it may be called upon to judge whether international commitments envisaged by the Communities are compatible with the Treaties.
For så vidt angår Domstolens øvrige beføjelser har indførelsen af et toinstanssystem for alle de sager, som anlægges af fysiske eller juridiske personer, og som fremover skal anlægges ved Retten i Første Instans med mulighed for appel til Domstolen, utvivlsomt medført en forbedring af beskyttelsen af borgerne og har gjort det muligt for den overordnede retsinstans at koncentrere sig mere om den væsentlige opgave at sikre en ensartet fortolkning af gældende ret på vilkår, som gør det muligt at sikre kvaliteten og effektiviteten i domstolssystemet.
As regards the remainder of the Court's jurisdiction, the setting up of a twotier system for all actions brought by natural or legal persons, which are now dealt with by the Court of First Instance subject to the possibility of an appeal to the Court of Justice, has undoubtedly afforded greater protection to individuals and has enabled the latter to devote itself more fully to its essential task of ensuring the uniform interpretation of the law, under conditions which preserve the quality and efficiency of the judicial system.
Med henblik på at fastholde fællesskabsretsordenens væsentligste kendetegn finder Domstolen det nødvendigt, at retsinstansernes opgaver og kompetence bibeholdes ved den forestående revision.
The Court considers it indispensable, if the essential features of the Community legal order are to be maintained, that the functions and prerogatives of its judicial organs be safeguarded in the forthcoming process of revision.
Når fællesskabsretten har kunnet opnå en så afgørende betydning i retslivet i medlemsstaterne, skyldes det, at den er blevet opfattet, fortolket og anvendt som fælles regler af borgerne, de administrative myndigheder og domstolene i alle medlemsstaterne, og at borgerne selv har påberåbt sig fællesskabsretten ved deres nationale retsinstanser.
The success of Community law in embedding itself so thoroughly in the legal life of the Member States is due to its having been perceived, interpreted and applied by the nationals, the administrations and the courts and tribunals of all the Member States as a uniform body of rules upon which individuals may rely in their national courts.
Domstolen har således, endog før tanken om unionsborgerskabet opstod, af traktaterne udledt forestillingen om en ny retsorden, hvori individerne er retssubjekter, og Domstolen har i mange tilfælde sikret borgerne, at de faktisk kunne udnytte de rettigheder, de var tillagt.
Even before there was the idea of citizenship of the Union, the Court had inferred from the Treaties the concept of a new legal order applying to individuals and had in many cases ensured that those individuals could exercise effectively the rights conferred upon them.