natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Når henses til, hvorledes Kommissionen forholdt sig, da samme situation opstod i 1986, er det utænkeligt, at Rådet i 1988 har villet ophæve fristen stiltiende og give medlemsstaterne mulighed for at ændre kvoterne uden en udtrykkelig tidsmæssig begrænsning.
The power of manoeuvre conferred on Member States by Article 25 of Regulation No 1785/81 may be exercised at the same time as an adjustment of quotas pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation No 193/82 following a transfer of undertakings or factories, provided that the specific conditions governing the application of each of those provisions are complied with.
Den fortolkning, som den italienske regering har foreslået, ville i øvrigt være i strid med retssikkerhedsprincippet.
Article 25(2) of Regulation No 1785/81 must be interpreted as meaning that Member States may reduce the A quota and the Β quota by 10% each.
ikke stiltiende eller indirekte fremgå af en forordning, den af fællesskabslovgiver fastsatte dato den 1. marts; en fravigelse af fristen, der kan have betydelige følger for virksomhederne, kan derfor
The term 'restructuring plans' within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 25(2) of Regulation No 1785/81, allowing quotas to be adjusted in Italy without the 10% limit applying refers toplans concerning the sugar sector as a whole at national or regional level.'
Medlemsstaterne kun for det produktionsår, der begynder den 1. juli, ikke udøve den handlebeføjelse, de er tillagt ved artikel 25, stk 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81 af 30. juni 1981 om den fælles markedsordning f or sukker, efter den i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 193/82 af 26. januar 1982 om almindeuge regler for overførsel af kvoter i sukkersektoren fastsatte frist den 1. marts, selv når den rådsforordning hvorved kvoterne fastsættes, og hvori det fastslås, at beføjelsen kan udøves, er udstedt efter den 1. marts, eftersom, der ikke er udstedt nogen fællesskabsforordning der udtrykkeligt fraviger denne frist
Article 7 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 193/82 of 26 January 1982 laying down general rules for transfers of quotas in the sugar sector and Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1662/86 of 29 May 1986 laying down transitional measures on the transfer of quotas in the sugar sector are to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State does not have the power unilaterally to alter the time-limit fixed by those provisions for the exercise by Member States of the "power of manoeuvre" provided for in Article 25 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 of 30 June 1981 on the common organization of the markets in the sugar sector.
Den handlebeføjelse, medlemsstaterne er tUlagt ved artikel 25 i forordning nr. 1785/81, kan udøves samtidig med en ændring af kvoter, foretaget i medfør af artikel 2 i forordning nr. 193/82, som følge af en afhændelse af virksomheder ellerfabrikker, idet de særlige betingelser for at anvende hver af disse bestemmelser dog skal overholdes.
The application of Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 193/82, which permits the adjustment of the A and Β quotas in the event of the merger or transfer of sugar undertakings, does not preclude the application, even at the same time and in respect of the same undertaking, of the power of manoeuvre conferred on Member States by Article 25 of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81, provided that the particular conditions for the application of each of those provisions are fulfilled.
Artikel 25, stk 2, i forordning nr. 1785/81 skal fortolkes således, at medlemsstaterne kan nedsætte såvel A-kvoten som B-kvoten med indtil 10%.
The second subparagraph of Article 25(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 is to be interpreted as meaning that Member States may reduce the A quota and the Β quota by up to 10% each.
Den udsvingsmargen på 10%, der er fastsat i artikel 25, stk 2, første afsnit, i forordning nr. 1785/81, vedrører de A- og B-kvoter, en virksomhed som led i den gældende kvoteordning har fået tildelt i henhold til en national afgørelse, som medlemsstaten har truffet i henhold til forordningens artikel 24, og hvorved den fordeler de A- og B-basismængder, den har fået tildelt, mellem de virksomheder, der er etableret på dens område.
The 10% margin of manoeuvre provided for in Article 25(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 relates to the quotas actually allocated to an undertaking, taking account of any adjustments made subsequent to the national decision sharing out the quotas.
Begrebet »projekter f or omstrukturering* i artikel 25, stk 2, andet afsnit, i forordning nr. 1785/81, som bevirker, at kvoterne i Italien kan ændres, uden at grænsen på 10% finder anvendelse, vedrører projekter for hele sukkersektoren på nationalt eller regionalt plan.*
The term "restructuring plan" within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 25(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 refers to a restructuring in a specifically delimited region or geographical area.'
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 1. juni 1995.
Case C-16/94 Edouard Dubois et Fils SA e.a. ν Garonor Exploitations SA Free movement of goods
Han foreslog at kende for ret:
11 August 1995
- Artikel 25, stk. 2, andet afsnit, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81 skal fortolkes således, at medlemsstaterne kan nedsætte A- kvoten og B-kvoten med hver 10%.
However, there is nothing to suggest that the charge at issue fulfils those conditions.
Den grænse for handlebeføjelsen på 10%, der er fastsat i artikel 25, stk. 2, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81, vedrører de kvoter, som faktisk er tildelt virksomheden, når der tages hensyn til eventuelle senere ændringer i den nationale afgørelse om fordeling af kvoter.
By judgment of 4 January 1994, received at the Court Registry on 17 January 1994, the French Cour de Cassation referred for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 9, 12, 13 and 16 of the EEC Treaty, now the EC Treaty.
- Begrebet 'projekter for omstrukturering' i artikel 25, stk. 2, andet afsnit, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81 vedrører en omstrukturering i en region eller et specifikt afgrænset geografisk område.«
That question was raised in proceedings between Garonor, the manager of an international road station, two of its customers, for non-payment by the latter of a contractually stipulated charge known as a 'taxe de passage'.
Præjudiciel »'Depotafgift' i henhold til en privatretlig aftale — afgift med tilsvarende virkning* (Femte Afdeling)
There can therefore be no question of levying any charges for customs clearance facilities accorded in the interests of the common market.
Ved dom af 4. januar 1994 indgået til Domstolen den 17. januar 1994 har Den Franske Republiks Cour de cassation forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 9, 12, 13 og 16 i EØF-traktaten, nu EF-traktaten.
The Cour de Cassation raised a point of law of its own motion, namely the possible infringement of Articles 9, 12, 13 and 16 of the EC Treaty.
bemærket, at »bortset fra udgifterne til vedligeholdelse af en parkeringsplads er den omtvistede 'afgift' bestemt til at dække udgifterne ved, at Garonor påtager sig at bære de omkostninger, der er forbundet med, at toldvæsenet og veterinærtjenesten, i det offentliges interesse, udfører deres opgaver«, hvorved retten er af den opfattelse, at denne »afgift« kan være udtryk for en afgift med tilsvarende virkning i henhold til de nævnte bestemmelser.
In those circumstances, a Member State is in breach of its obligations under Articles 9 and 12 of the Treaty if, in respect of intra-Community trade, it charges economic agents the costs of inspections and administrative formalities carried out by customs offices.
Spørgsmålet er blevet rejst under en tvist mellem selskabet Garonor exploitation, der driver en international fragtterminal, og to af terminalens brugere, hvori der er strid om disses manglende betaling af en aftalemæssig såkaldt »taxe de passage« (»depotafgift«).
Articles 9 and 12 of the Treaty require the Member States to bear the costs of the controls and formalities carried out in connection with the movement of goods across frontiers. Thus, the Court has held that the costs occasioned by health inspections must be met by the general public which, as a whole, benefits from the free movement of Community goods.
I henhold til traktatens artikel 9 og 12 er medlemsstaterne forpligtet til at bære omkostningerne ved kontrol og formaliteter, der er forbundet med, at varer passerer grænserne.
Whether the pecuniary charge is borne by the economic agent by virtue of a unilateral measure adopted by the authorities or, as in the present case, as a result of a series of private contracts, it arises in all cases, directly or indirectly, from the failure of the Member State concerned to fulfil its financial obligations under Articles 9 and 12 of the Treaty.
Det fremgår af fast retspraksis, at en afgift, der rammer varer i anledning af, at disse passerer en grænse, falder uden for anvendelsesområdet for traktatens artikel 9 og 12, såfremt afgiften er et modstykke til en konkret tjenesteydelse, der faktisk og individuelt præsteres over for den erhvervsdrivende, og står i et rimeligt forhold til denne tjenesteydelse.
'Articles 9 and 12 of the EC Treaty apply to a transit charge designed to compensate a private undertaking for bearing costs arising from the performance by the customs and veterinary services of their tasks as providers of services in the public interest even if it has not been imposed by the State but arises from an agreement concluded by that undertaking with its customers.'
Der foreligger dog intet til støtte for, at den her omhandlede afgift opfylder disse kriterier.
He proposed that the Court should rule as follows:
For det første rammer afgiften generelt alle køretøjer i international transit, hvis last toldbehandles inden for fragtterminalen.
'A transit charge not imposed by the State or any body operating under its auspices but provided for in a contract between private individuals is not a charge having an effect equivalent to a customs duty within the meaning of Articles 9, 12, 13 and 16 of the EC Treaty.
For det andet indebærer det forhold, at en toldbehandling finder sted inde i landet, ganske vist visse fordele for de erhvervsdrivende, men disse fordele er udelukkende forbundet med selve toldbehandlingen, som altid er en pligt, uanset hvor den gennemføres.
However, the expenses relating to the operation of customs and veterinary services must be borne entirely by the State and may not therefore, on any basis, be borne by economic agents.
Endvidere er disse fordele en følge af ordningen for fællesskabsforsendelse, der blev indført ved Rådets forordninger (EØF)
It is therefore contrary to the combined provisions of Article 3(c) and the second paragraph of Article 5 and Articles 9, 12, 13 and 16 of the Treaty for a State to act in such a way that private individuals are required to defray such costs, even as a result of a pecuniary charge provided for in a contract, in connection with the carriage of goods across the frontier of a Member State.'
Det er herved uden betydning, hvorledes der nærmere træffes bestemmelse om, at en erhvervsdrivende skal bære en del af de omkostninger, der er forbundet med, at toldvæsenet udfører sine opgaver.
Case C-240/94 Commission of the European Communities ν Ireland Approximation of laws
Domstolen besvarede det forelagte spørgsmål således:
11 August 1995 of Directives 89/336/EEC and 92/311 EEC
»EF-traktatens artikel 9 og 12 finder anvendelse på en 'depotafgift', som har til formål at dække en privat virksomheds omkostninger ved, at denne påtager sig at bære de udgifter, der er forbundet med, at toldvæsenet og veterinærtjenesten, i det offentliges interesse, udfører deres opgaver, også selv om afgiften ikke er blevet pålagt af staten, men følger af en aftale, som den private virksomhed har indgået med sine kunder.*
(Failure to fulfil obligations Non-transposition Electromagnetic compatibility) (Fifth Chamber) with Council Directive 89/336/EEC and with Council Directive 92/31/EEC, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and 2(1) of the abovementioned directives and Article 189 of the EC Treaty.
Generaladvokat A La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 18. maj 1995.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 30 August 1994, the Commission brought an action for a declaration that, by omitting to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply
med artikel 9, 12, 13 og 16, til hinder for, at en medlemsstat opretholder en ordning, der i praksis medfører, at privatretlige juridiske personer må bære sådanne omkostninger, også selv om dette sker i form af, at der i forbindelse med transport af varer, der passerer en medlemsstats grænser, skal erlægges en pengeydelse på grundlag af en privatretlig aftale.«
Declares that, by omitting to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility and Council Directive 92/31/EEC of 28 April 1992 amending Directive 89/336, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Article 2(1) of the abovementioned directives and Article 189 of the EC Treaty;
Sag C-240/94 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Irland Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Orders Ireland to pay the costs.'
Irland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 12, stk 1, i Rådets direktiv 89/336/EØF af 3. maj 1989 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om elektromagnetisk kompatibilitet, artikel 2, stk 1, i Rådets direktiv 92/31/EØF af 28 april 1992 om ændring af direktiv 89/336/EØF og EF-traktatens artikel 189, idet det ikke har vedtaget de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme de nævnte direktiver.
Declare that, by omitting to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose into national law Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility and Council Directive 92/31/EEC of 28 April 1992 amending Directive 89/336/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Article 2(1) of the abovementioned directives respectively and under the third paragraph of Article 189 of the EEC Treaty, and
Generaladvokat G. Kosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 8. juni 1995.
Joined Cases C-367/93 to C-377/93 F.G. Roders BV e.a. v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen Taxation
Præjudiciel »Vinafgifter — diskriminerende (Sjette Afdeling)
The importers in question, who had been unable to obtain the exemptions for fruit wines, claimed in their objections that the Netherlands legislation, in so far as it taxed wines differently according to whether they had been made from grapes or from fruit other than grapes, was incompatible with Article 95 of the Treaty.
Ved elleve kendelser af 7. juli 1993, indgået til Domstolen den 30. juli s.a., har Tariefcommissie forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af traktatens artikel 95.
Products falling outside those categories, in particular owing to an alcoholic strength in excess of that specified, were regarded as 'alcoholic substances' and, as such, were subject to a duty on alcohol, which was levied at a higher rate.
I henhold til harmoniseringskonventionens artikel 9a, stk. 3, har de kompetente ministre for de kontraherende parter endvidere kunnet indrømme hel eller delvis fritagelse for forbrugsafgifterne for gærede drikkevarer, som var fremstillet på basis af andre frugter end friske eller tørrede druer inden for Benelux-landenc eller indført på deres område.
The national court is inquiring more particularly about the meaning of domestic products referred to in Article 95 and, in the event that the first paragraph is to be applied, whether the products at issue might be similar to the exempted fruit wines.
Også de luxembourgske vine, der fremstilles på basis af druer, kunne efter Benelux-reglerne fritages for forbrugsafgifterne.
Should it emerge that the products at issue are not similar to domestic products, it will then be necessary to consider whether the second paragraph of Article 95 is applicable.
På tidspunktet for de faktiske omstændigheder i hovedsagerne anvendtes de satser for forbrugsafgifterne, som fremgik af den dagældende syvende protokol af 14. september 1984 til harmoniseringskonventionen.
In principle, all still wines, produced in or imported into the Netherlands, are subject to an excise duty on wine and to a special excise duty on wine. Likewise, all sparkling wines are in principle subject to an excise duty on sparkling wines and to a special excise duty on sparkling wines.
De heri fastsatte afgifter var ligeledes indeholdt i den nederlandske lov af 30. maj 1963 om forbrugsafgifter for alkoholholdige produkter.
However, under Articles 85a and 88d of the 1963 Law, still fruit wines were exempted from excise duty provided that they met certain requirements with regard to labelling and packaging.
I medfør af disse regler kunne den toldmyndighed, som havde den territoriale kompetence, opkræve den fælles forbrugsafgift af de varer, som importeredes fra andre stater, afhængig af på hvilket sted de blev indført på Beneluxområdet.
It should be observed here that Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg are to be regarded as a single territory so far as excise duties on wines are concerned.
Parterne foretog som følge heraf regelmæssigt en indbyrdes afregning vedrørende den opkrævede told.
The Unification Convention standardized the rates of duty for fermented fruit beverages and sparkling fermented beverages and the criteria governing
I klagerne havde importørerne — som ikke havde kunnet opnå afgiftsfritagelse for frugtvinene -anført, at den nederlandske lovgivning var i strid med traktatens artikel 95, for så vidt som den indeholdt forskellige afgifter for vine af druer og for vine af andre frugter end druer.
It must now be considered whether the various grape wines at issue in the main proceedings are similar to fruit wines within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 95 of the Treaty.
Den affattelse af loven af 1963, som gjaldt på tidspunktet for de faktiske omstændigheder i hovedsagerne, indeholdt en sondring, mellem på den ene side stille vine, herunder såvel vine af druer, hvis alkoholindhold ikke overstiger 22% vol., som vine af frugter, hvis alkoholindhold ikke overstiger 15% vol., og på den anden side mousserende vine, herunder dels mousserende vine fremstillet på basis af druer, deb mousserende vine fremstillet på basis af andre frugter end druer. De produkter, som ikke henhører under disse grupper, navnlig fordi de har et større alkoholindhold end det angivne, var klassificeret som »alkoholholdige produkter« og som sådan pålagt en større forbrugsafgift på grundlag af alkoholen.
As regards red wines, a distinction must be made between table wines and quality red wines produced in specified regions.
Det fremgår af forelæggelseskendelserne, at den nationale rets spørgsmål navnlig drejer sig om, hvorledes begrebet indenlandske varer i artikel 95 skal forstås, og om de i sagen omhandlede varer — såfremt artikel 95, stk. 1, finder anvendelse — kan anses for lignende varer som de frugtvine, der er afgiftsfritaget.
The Court found that table wines, whether fruit wines or grape wines, are made from the same kind of basic products, namely agricultural products, and by the same process, namely natural fermentation.
Såfremt de i sagen omhandlede varer derimod ikke kan anses for lignende varer som de indenlandske varer, må det undersøges, om artikel 95, stk. 2, kan finde anvendelse.
It further observed that the two categories of wine possess similar organoleptic properties — in particular taste and alcohol strength — and meet the same needs of consumers, inasmuch as they can be consumed for the same purposes, namely both to quench thirst and to refresh, and to accompany meals.
Definitionen af begrebet »indenlandske varer« er et væsentligt element ved anvendelsen af artikel 95.
The preferential tax treatment accorded to Luxembourg grape wines within Benelux territory, in relation to imported wines, was not contrary to the Treaty.
Af alle stille vine, som fremstilles eller indføres i Nederlandene, skal der som hovedregel svares en forbrugsafgift for vin og en særlig forbrugsafgift for vin.
By virtue of the second paragraph of Article 1(1) of the Protocol on the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg annexed to the EEC Treaty, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands were to apply the system provided for in the third paragraph of Article 6 of the Convention on the Economic Union of Belgium and Luxembourg of 25 July 1921.
Også af alle mousserende vine skal der som hovedregel svares såvel en forbrugsafgift som en særlig forbrugsafgift for sådanne vine.
That derogation has been maintained, on the basis of Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 541/70 of the Council of 20 March 1970 on agriculture in the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (OJ, English Special Edition 1970 (I), p.
Stille frugtvine er dog afgiftsfritaget, såfremt de opfylder visse betingelser med hensyn til etikettering og emballering.
161) and other subsequent regulations. Those tax exemptions were abolished on 1 January 1993, pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 204/90.
Afgiften for mousserende vine af frugter er endvidere lavere end afgiften for mousserende vine af druer.
As regards the types of liqueur wine at issue, they are different from table wines by reason of the fact that they are usually consumed as aperitifs or as dessert wines and therefore meet different needs from the point of view of consumers.
Desuden skal der betales vinafgift af importerede mousserende vine fremstillet på basis af druer, mens importerede mousserende vine fremstillet på basis af frugter er fritaget for denne afgift.
Secondly, it should be noted that the alcohol strength of sherry (17% vol.) and of madeira (18% vol.) is higher than that of the favoured fruit wines (15% vol.).
Den 11. januar 1991 afviste Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen, Amsterdam, de elleve klager, som importørerne havde indgivet vedrørende anvendelsen af vinafgifterne og de særlige vinafgifter ved indførsel af følgende produkter fra andre medlemsstater:
Although the Benelux countries did not therefore infringe Article 95 by according preferential treatment to grape wines produced in Luxembourg, they were still not at liberty to favour fruit wines produced in one of the three Benelux countries, to the detriment of beverages which might be similar, coming from another Member State of the Community.
Det må herom fastslås, at Belgiens, Nederlandenes og Luxembourgs områder bør anses for ét område i henseende til forbrugsafgifter for vin.
Fruit wines produced in the Benelux countries enjoyed preferential tax treatment in relation to imported grape wines.
Der er nemlig ved harmoniseringskonventionen indført ensartede satser og kriterier for de forbrugsafgifter, som opkræves for gærede drikkevarer fremstillet på basis af frugter og for mousserende gærede drikkevarer, idet der herfor er fastsat dels en fælles sats, dels en supplerende sats, som finder anvendelse i Belgien og Nederlandene.
Vermouth has an alcoholic strength of 13.5% vol., and could therefore be put in the same class as still fruit wines whose alcoholic strength does not exceed 15% vol.
Desuden har Benelux-staterne indført en ens ordning for opkrævning af forbrugsafgifter og en ordning for indbyrdes afregning.
Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that vermouth is not made from the same kind of basic products as fruit wines since not only is ethyl alcohol added to grape wine but also a small quantity of mixed herbs which give vermouth its special flavour.
med et madeira fra Portugal alkoholindhold på 18% med et rødvin fra Frankrig alkoholindhold på 12%
It follows that the organoleptic properties of vermouth do not match those of still fruit wines and that these two categories of beverage meet different consumer needs.