natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1) Artikel 59 i EØF-traktaten skal fortolkes således, at den vedrorer de tjenesteydelser, som en tjenesteyder telefonisk tilbyder potentielle modlagere etableret i andre medlemsstater, og som han udfører fra den medlemsstat, hvori han er etableret.
Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ L 158, 23.6.1990) Package travel, holidays and tours Greece
Manglende meddelelse om nationale foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af direktiver
Directive 92/86/EEC (OJ L 325, 11.11.1992) Cosmetic products Portugal
Direktiv 90/605/EØF (EFT L 317 af 16.11.1990) Årsregnskaber og konsoliderede regnskaber — anvendel­sesområde Tyskland
Directive 90/605/EEC (OJ L 317, 16.11.1990) Annual accounts and consolidated accounts — scope of the Directive Germany
Forbindelser med tredjelande
Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 (OJ L 378, 31.12.1986) Maritime transport — provision of assistance to inves­tigators Italy
EF-traktatens artikel 228, stk. 1, andet afsnit
Articles 3, 5 and 85 of the EC Treaty Customs agents Italy industrial relations and social
1) Fællesskabet er kompetent til al deltage i OECD's tredje reviderede beslutning.
Article 48 of the EC Treaty Access to employment and conditions of employment for medical specialists Greece
Bulletinen indeholder konklusionerne af de vigtigste domme og kendelser, der er afsagt af Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans, og som er offentliggjort i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende i den pågældende periode.
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance
De vigtigste retsafgørelser
Court of Justice
Socialpolitik og arbejdstagernes frie bevægelighed
Free movement of workers and social policy
EF-traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, andet afsnit
24.3.1994: Opinion 2/92 (requested by
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Forste Inslåns
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance
10.5.1995 — Sag C-417/93 — Parlamen­tet mod Rådet.
10.5.1995: Case C­417/93 v Council.
8.3.1995 — Sag C-89/94 — Kommissio­nen mod Grækenland.
8.3.1995: Case C­89/94 v Greece.
9.3.1995 — Sag C-100/94 — Kommis­sionen mod Grækenland.
9.3.1995: Case C­100/94 v Greece.
Annullering af Kommissionens beslutning 92/553/EØF al' 22. juli 1992 om en procedure i henhold til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4064/89 (sag nr. IV/M. 190 — Nesllé mod Perrier.
16.2.1995: Case C­397/93 Voltri Ter­minal Europa v Donati and Others.
6.4.1995 — Sag C-147/94 — Kommis­sionen mod Spanien.
1.8.29. v Spain.
4.5.1995 — Sag C-422/92 — Kommis­sionen mod Tyskland.
(1) The application is dismissed. (Application for annulment of Commission Decision 92/553/EEC of 22 July 1992 relating to a proceeding under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Case No IV/M.190 — Nestlé/Perrier).)
Statsstøtte
Other decisions
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans
(1) Commission Decision 91/474/EEC of 16 August 1991 concerning aid granted by the Italian Govern­ment to Italgrani SpA for the setting­up of an agri­foodstuffs complex in the Mezzogiorno is annulled.
2) Kommissionen bærer sine egne omkostninger og betaler sagsøgernes omkostninger.
(2) The Commission shall bear its own costs together with the costs incurred by the applicants.
3) Intervenienterne bærer hver deres egne omkostninger.
(3) The interveners shall bear their own costs. OJ C 159, 24.6.1995
1) Artikel 1 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2849/92 af 28. september 1992 om ændring af den ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1739/85 indførte endelige antidumpingtold på impor­ten af kuglelejer med største udvendige diameter på over 30 mm med oprindelse i Japan annulleres, for så vidt ansøgerne herved rammes af en antidumpingtold.
(3) The Commission shall bear its own costs together with the costs incurred by the applicants.
Intervenienterne bærer hver deres egne omkostninger.
(4) The interveners shall bear their own costs.
6.4.1995 — Forenede sager T­80/89, T­81/89, T­83/89, T­87/89, T­88/89, T­90/89, T­93/89, T­95/89, T­97­89, T­99/89, T­100/89, Τ­Ι 01/89, T­1 03/89, T­105/89, T­107/89 og T­112/89 — BASF AG, Monsanto Company, NV DSM og DSM Kuntststoffen BV, Orkem SA, Bayer AG, Atochem SA, Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap AS (Statoil), Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Neste Oy, Repsol Quími­ca SA, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, Montedison SpA, Chemie Holding AG og The Dow Chemical Company mod Kommissionen.
6.4.1995: Joined Cases T­80/89, T­81/89, T­83/89, T­87/89, T­88/89, T­90/89, T­93/89, T­95/89, T­97/89, T­99/89, T­100/89, T­101/89, T­103/89, T­105/89, T­107/89 and T­112/89 BASF and Others ν Commission.
Frie varebevægelser
1.8.53. mission.
Dom af 15. juni 1995 sag C­391/92, Kommissionen mod Grækenland.
10.3.1995: Case T­395/94R Atlantic Container Line and Others v Commission. OJ C 159, 24.6.1995
Med denne dom tager Domstolen stilling til begre­bet salgsformer, som først var omhandlet i sagerne Keck og Mithouard (dom af 24. november 1993, sag C­267/91 og C­268/91, Sml. 1993, s. 1­6097).
Following the line taken in Keck and Mithouard, the Court went on to consider whether these rules were discriminatory in law or in fact. It concluded that since the legislation was applica­ble to all products irrespective of their origin it was not discriminatory.
Spørgsmålet var, om en sådan foranstaltning skal betragtes som et påbud
Judgment of 10 May, Case C­384/93 Alpine Investments v Minister van Financiën.
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans det foreliggende tilfælde er berettiget af hensyn til den pågældende (finansielle) sektors gode omdøm­me.
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance fers of financial services by telephone — Re­striction imposed by the Member State in which the provider is established — Imperative reasons for measures in the general interest.
om en bestemt form for salg (forbrugerne skal indfinde sig et bestemt sted for at købe spædbørnsmælken) eller som en foranstaltning, der influerer på varernes adgang til det pågældende marked (producenterne skal nødvendigvis henvende sig til apotekere for at få distribueret deres varer).
The Court also held that the Dutch prohibition on cold calling was proportionate to the aim pur­sued, in that it simply prevented the providers of financial services from contacting potential clients without their prior written consent but did not prevent them from contacting existing clients.
Domstolen fastslog først, at den omstændighed, at restriktionen vedrører et tilbud om en tjenesteydel­se og ikke selve tjenesteydelsen, ikke var til hinder for anvendelsen af EF-traktatens artikel 59.
This was the first case in which the Court ruled on the compatibility with Article 59 of the EC Treaty of a restriction on the freedom to provide services which had been imposed by the Mem­ber State where the provider was established.
Endvidere vil et sådant forbud være en hindring for den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser af grænseoverskridende karakter, da det fratager de berørte virksomheder muligheden for hurtigt og direkte at kunne reklamere og tage kontakt med potentielle kunder i andre medlemsstater.
Competition — Administrative procedure — Right to be heard — Authentication of a Com­mission decision.
På baggrund af retspraksis i sagen Keck og Mithouard undersøgte Domstolen dernæst, om denne salgsform retligt eller faktisk var diskriminerende.
Reference: Commission Decisions 91/297/EEC to 91/300/EEC relating to a proceeding under Article 85( 1 ) of the EC Treaty (soda-ash): OJ L 152, 15.6.1991
Den konkluderede, at den pågældende foranstalt­ning tog sigte på alle produkter, uanset deres oprindelse, hvorfor den ikke er diskriminerende.
Dutch legislation prohibited 'cold calling' — the practice of approaching potential clients by tele­phone without their prior written consent to of­fer them financial services.
Diskriminationen skyldes ikke den omstændighed, at Den Hellenske Republik ikke selv fremstiller forarbejdet mælk til spædbørn, og Domstolen betegner dette som en faktisk og tilfældig omstæn­dighed.
The Court had to rule whether this prohibition, as applied to tele­phone calls to clients resident in other Member States, was compatible with Article 59. The Court found that such a restriction was indeed covered by Article 59 but that in this particular case it was justified by the need to uphold the reputation of the financial sector.
Fri bevægelighed for tjenesteydelser
In these five judgments the Court of First Instance annulled four Commission Decisions relating to soda-ash.
Domstolen fastslog, at beskyttelsen af forbrugere på andre medlemsstaters territorium ikke som sådan tilfalder de nederland­ske myndigheder, og at den derfor ikke kan god­tage en hindring for den frie udveksling af tjenes­teydelser.
The applicants complained that the Commission, having recognized the relevance of certain seized documents, had not then included these documents in the files relating to the various cases.
Til gengæld godtog Domstolen, at hen­synet til den finansielle sektors omdømme er en tvingende almen grund, der kan berettige restriktio­ner i den frie udveksling af finansielle tjenesteydel­ser.
The Court held that, in the interests of natural justice, the companies challenged in a competition case should have the same access as the Commission to the facts material to the pro­ceedings.
Domstolen understregede, at forbrugeren, som sædvanligvis er ganske uforberedt, hverken kan få oplysninger om de indbyggede risici ved de trans­aktioner, der foreslås ham, eller er i stand til at sammenligne prisen på og kvaliteten af de tjenes­teydelser, der udbydes, med konkurrenternes til­bud.
The Court also held that companies' right to the protection of business secrets should not be used to restrict applicants' right to a fair hearing.
Endvidere er det den medlemsstat, hvorfra telefonopkaldet foretages, der er bedst i stand til at regulere området »cold calling«.
The proper balance had to be struck be­tween these two rights.
Denne sag gav Domstolen mulighed for før første gang at udtale sig om, hvorvidt en restriktion vedrørende den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser, som er indført af den medlemsstat, hvor tjeneste­yderen er etableret, er forenelig med EF-traktatens artikel 59.
In the case in issue the Court accordingly said that the Commission should have prepared non-confidential versions of all the documents in question and should have
Domstolen fandt ligeledes, at forbuddet mod »cold calling« i den nederlandske lovgivning stod i et rimeligt forhold til det tilstræbte formål.
The interesting aspect of the Court's judgment is the possible justification for such a measure.
Ganske vist forbydes det tjenesteyderne at rette henvendel­se til potentielle kunder uden disses forudgående skriftlige samtykke, men forbuddet vedrører ikke aktuelle kunder.
In the first place the Court held that the protection of consumers in other Member States was not in itself a matter for the Dutch authorities and could not therefore provide grounds for restrict­ing the freedom to provide services.
Sagen vedrørte den nederlandske lovgivning, som forbyder den såkaldte »cold calling«, dvs. en frem­gangsmåde, hvorved der optages telefonisk kontakt med potentielle kunder uden deres skriftlige sam­tykke med henblik på at tilbyde dem finansielle tjenesteydelser. Domstolen skulle tage stilling til, om dette forbud, når det drejer sig om opkald til kunder i andre medlemsstater, var foreneligt med EF-traktatens artikel 59.
On the other hand, the Court acknowledged that safe­guarding the financial sector's reputation might constitute an imperative reason for action in the public interest and might justify restrictions on the freedom to provide financial services.
For første gang kunne Domstolen konstatere, at en sådan restriktion er omfattet af EF-traktatens artikel 59, men at den i
More­over, the Member State from which the calls were made was in the best position to regulate cold calling.
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Forste Instans sionen. Konkurrence — Administrativ procedure — Ret til kontradiktion — Stadfæstelse af en beslutning vedtaget af kommissærkollegiet
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance sent to the parties concerned a list of those docu­ments to which it might require access.
Reference: Kommissionens beslutninger 91/297/ EØF til 91/300/EØF om en procedure i henhold til EØF­traktatens artikel 85 (soda) — EFT L 152 af 15.6.1991
In March the Commission decided to commence proceedings because it had serious doubts as to whether the bid was compatible with the com­mon market.
Med disse fem domme annullerede Førsteinstans­retten fire af Kommissionens beslutninger i den såkaldte »sodasag«.
The CGT trade union, representing staff at Source Perrier, then asked the Commis­sion to provide information on the inquiries being conducted.
Annulleringerne er udelukken­de foretaget af proceduremæssige årsager.
In response to this request the Commission held a meeting with trade union representatives at which the latter outlined to the Commission their concerns regarding the merger.
overensstemmelse med de gældende formforskrif­ter.
In Cases T­31/91, T­32/91 and T­37/91 the Decisions concerned were annulled on the ground that, based as they were on an infringe­ment of Articles 85 (T­31/91) and 86 of the Treaty, they had not been authenticated in ac­cordance with the procedural rules applicable at the time.
Med hensyn til godtagelsen af dette anbringen­de, fastslog Retten, at overtrædelsen af form­forskriften uden videre kan undersøges af Domsto­len.
As regards the admissibility of the application, the Court held that infringements of procedural requirements did fall within its juris­diction.
Ifølge Retten fremgår det af artikel 12 i Kommissionens forretningsorden, at stadfæstelsen af et dokument, der er vedtaget af Kommissionen, skal finde sted, inden det meddeles.
Article 12 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure suggested that the authentication of a document adopted by the Commission should precede notification.
En efterfølgen­de stadfæstelse må derfor betragtes sum en over­trædelse af formforskrifterne i den i traktatens artikel 173 omhandlede forstand.
Ex post authentication was consequently held to be an infringement of an essential procedural requirement within the meaning of Article 173 of the Treaty.
I modsætning til dommen i BASF­sagen (sag C­137/92 P. Kommis­sionen mod BASF o.a., afsagt 15. juni 1994, Sml.
Making the distinction from the Court of Justice's judg­ment of 15 June 1994 in Commission ν BASF and Others (Case C­137/92 [1994] ECR 1­2555), the Court of First Instance stated that in this case the infringement arose from the simple fact of non­compliance with a procedural requirement.
1994, s. 1­2555) fastslår Retten, at denne overtræ­delse består i den manglende overholdelse af form­forskrifterne.
It had considered this infringement without reference to the question of discrepan­cies in the text as adopted, notified and pub­lished.
Dette er uafhængigt af, hvorvidt den meddelte og den offentliggjorte tekst udviser uoverensstemmelser.
Only the CGT took part in the proceedings, despite the express invi­tation which Article 18(4) of the Merger Regu­lation extends to recognized workers' represen­tatives.
Konkur­rence — Forordningen om »koncentrationer« — artikel 173 i EF­traktaten — antagelse af en sag — fagforeningers og personaleudvalgs interesse i at handle.
Competition — Merger Regulation — Article 173 of the EC Treaty — Admissibility of an application — Interest of trade unions and works councils in bringing proceedings.
Reference: Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4064/89 om kontrol med fusioner og virksomhedsovertagelser — EFT L 395 al' 30.12.1989. Bull. 12­1989, punkt 2.1.78 og Suppl. Bul. 2/90­Bull.
Reference: Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations be­tween undertakings: OJ L 395, 30.12.1989; Bull. 12­1989, point 2.1.78; Supplement 2/90 — Bull.
Parterne havde desuden over for Retten gjort gæl­dende, at Kommissionen havde gjort brug af doku­menter, der indeholder elementer, der støtter sagsø­ger, men som ikke var blevet meddelt sagsøger og senere ikke vedlagt de forskellige sager.
For the first time the Court of First Instance defined the conditions for the admissibility of appeals by staff representatives against a Com­mission Decision on a merger under Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89.
Retten fandt, at ud fra princippet om »lige våben« må det i en konkurrencesag forudsættes, at den pågældende virksomhed har et kendskab svarende til Kommis­sionens til det materiale, der anvendes i sagen.
In February 1992, as required by the Merger Regulation, Nestlé informed the Commission of a takeover bid for the shares of Source Perrier.
Endvidere fandt Retten, at virksomhedernes ret til beskyttelse af forretningshemmelighed ikke må benyttes til at begrænse sagsøgers ret til at forsvare sig.
Assessing the admissibility of the application under Article 173 of the Treaty, the Court con­sidered whether the applicants were individually and directly concerned.
Retten mener, at disse to rettigheder må være afbalanceret på en rimelig måde. Derfor konstaterer den, at Kommissionen i det foreliggende tilfælde er forpligtet til at udarbejde ikke­fortrolige versioner af alle de pågældende dokumenter og fremsende en liste til de involverede parter over de dokumenter, som Kommissionen kan kræve at få adgang til.
In the past it had been consistently held that the first of these tests was satisfied if the decision challenged affected the applicants by reason of their particular attributes or by reason of factual circumstances distin­guishing them from others and singling them out as if the decision were addressed to them.
Med denne dom har Retten i Første Instans for første gang fastslået betingelserne for antagelse af sager anlagt af medarbejderrepræsentanter mod en beslutning vedrørende fusioner, som Kommissio­nen har truffet i henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 4064/89 om kontrol med fusioner og virksomheds­overtagelser.
The Court concluded that such was the case in this instance, given that Article 18(4) of the Regu­lation confers on workers' representatives at the firms concerned the right to be heard, upon application, in the proceedings.
I sagerne T­31/91, T­32/91 og T­37/91 er annulle­ringen begrundet med, at de pågældende beslutnin­ger, som var baseret på en overtrædelse af EF­traktatens artikel 85 (T­31/91) og 86, ikke var blevet stadfæstet på det pågældende tidspunkt i
On the other hand, the Court took the view that the applicants were not directly concerned by the Commission Decision because only a decision likely to im­pinge on the status or prerogatives of workers' representative bodies could affect the interests of these bodies as such.
I henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 4064/89 indgav Nestlé i februar 1992 anmeldelse til Kommissionen om et offentligt tilbud om overtagelse af aktierne i Source Perrier.
Nor did the Commission Decision directly affect the interests of the workers themselves.
Kommissionen besluttede i marts 1992 at indlede en procedure, da den fandt, at den
The possibility of redun­dancies and the loss of welfare benefits could
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans kunne gribe ind i selvstændige rettigheder, som indehaves af repræsentanterne for arbejdstagerne, kan berøre sådanne organers interesser.
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance not be regarded as the inevitable consequence of a decision authorizing a merger.
Fagfore­ningen CGT Perrier anmodede herefter Kommis­sionen om oplysninger vedrørende den igangvæ­rende undersøgelse.
lion for the Mezzogiorno, including industrial investments for the establishment of starch and isoglucose plants.
Efter denne anmodning arran­gerede Kommissionen et informationsmøde med fagforeningsrepræsentanterne, under hvilket disse gav udtryk for deres bekymring over den anmeldte fusion.
The Italian authorities then made substantial changes to their original invest­ment programme and the associated aid scheme, whereupon the Commission adopted Decision 91/ 474/EEC declaring the scheme compatible with the common market.
Retten indrømmer dog sagsøgerne ret til at anlægge sag, men kun med det formål at få efterprøvet, om de processuelle rettigheder, som er tillagt dem ved forordning 4064/89, artikel 18, er overholdt.
The Court nevertheless acknowledged the appli­cants' right to bring the action, but only for the purpose of considering whether the rights to which they were entitled under Article 18 of the Regulation were fully safeguarded.
Under alle omstændigheder kan Retten kun annullere beslutningen som følge af tilsidesættelse af væsent­lige formkrav, såfremt der er sket en kvalificeret krænkelse af disse rettigheder.
At the same time the Court pointed out that unless there had been a clear and unmistakable violation of these rights it could not annul the Decision on the ground that essential procedural requirements had been infringed.
Samarbejdsudvalget for la Société générale des grandes sources, Fagforeningen CGT Perrier, Samarbejdsudvalget for Vittel og andre medarbej­derrepræsentanter for Perrier og Vittel indgav derefter to annullationssøgsmål mod ovennævnte beslutning.
An application for the annulment of this Deci­sion was lodged by certain starch and sorbitol manufacturers.
Bortset fra fagforeningen CGT Perrier deltog de øvrige intervenienter ikke i proceduren på trods af den udtrykkelige opfordring hertil, som fremgår af artikel 18, stk. 4, i forordningen om »fusioner«.
Bearing in mind the small num­ber of such manufacturers and the substantial increase in production capacity which would result from the investments planned by the com­pany receiving the disputed aid, the Court held that the applicants could be treated as if they were addressees of the Decision and declared the application admissible.
Med hensyn til sagens realitet, afviste Retten, at sagsøgernes rettigheder skulle være tilsidesat, idet den fandt, at beskyttelsen af tredjemands legitime interesser ikke kræver, at de under den administra­tive procedure er sikret samme garantier, som de parter, der er berørt af fusionen.
As regards the substantive issues, the Court rejected the plea that the applicants' rights had not been fully respected, taking the view that al­though the legitimate interests of third parties had to be protected, they were not necessarily entitled to the same rights during the adminis­trative proceedings as those granted to persons concerned by the merger.
Retten fandt, at Kommissionen ikke var forpligtet til at give oplys­ninger om sagens art og genstand i henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 4064/89, artikel 18, stk. 4, såfremt der ikke foreligger en anmodning i henhold til samme bestemmelse.
The Commission was not obliged to provide information on the nature and purpose of the proceedings if it had not received an application to be heard as provided by Article 18(4) of the Regulation.
Kommissionen var heller ikke forpligtet til foreslå, at fagforeningen CGT Perrier fik aktindsigt, som omhandlet i forordning (EØF) nr. 4064/89, artikel 18, stk. 3, eftersom CGT Perrier ikke tilhører kategorien af direkte berørte parter, i den i nævnte bestemmelse omhandlede forstand.
Nor was the Commission obliged to offer the CGT at Perrier access to the file under Article 18(3) since the union was not one of the parties directly involved within the meaning of that provision.
Sagen vedrørte en beslutning truffet af Kommissio­nen i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2.
The application was for the annulment of a Commission Decision based on Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty.
Ved beslutning 88/318/EØF om lov nr. 64 af 1. marts 1986 om reglerne for ekstraordinær støtte til Mezzogiorno godkendte Kommissionen generelt en italiensk statsstøtteordning for Mezzogiorno.
As regards the substantive issues, the Court of First Instance followed the line taken by the Court of Justice in Case 5/85 AKZO Chemie [1986] ECR 2585 and Case C-137/92P Commis­sion ν BASF and Others [1994] ECR 1-2555 (PVC) and said that Article 12 of the Commis­sion's Rules of Procedure, as it stood at the time when the contested Decision was adopted, required the authentication of acts adopted by the Commission, except in the case of acts adopted by the delegation procedure.