natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ahmet Bozkurt har anført, at retten til ophold i Nederlandene kan udledes af artikel 6, stk. 2, andet punktum, i afgørelse nr. 1/80 - der omhandler fravær af længere varighed på grund af sygdom — når henses til hans forudgående beskæftigelsesperiode.
Mr Bozkurt considers that he can derive a right to remain in the Netherlands from the second sentence of Article 6(2) of Decision No 1/80, inasmuch as it refers to long absences on account of sickness, taking into account the preceding period of employment.
Artikel 6, stk. 2, har alene til formål at regulere betydningen af visse afbrydelser af arbejdet for så vidt angår artikel 6, stk. 1.
Article 6(2) is intended only to regulate the consequences, for the application of Article 6(1), of certain breaks in employment.
Årlig ferie, barselsorlov samt fravær på grund af arbejdsulykker eller sygdom af kortere varighed ligestilles således med perioder med lovlig beskæftigelse, navnlig ved beregningen af varigheden af den lovlige beskæftigelse, der stilles krav om for at opnå ret til fri adgang til enhver form for lønnet arbejde.
Accordingly, annual holidays and absences for reasons of maternity or an accident at work or short periods of sickness are treated as periods of legal employment, particularly in calculating the length of the period of legal employment required in order to acquire the right of free access to any paid employment.
Arbejdsløshedsperioder eller fravær af længere varighed på grund af sygdom, der ikke ligestilles med perioder med lovlig beskæftigelse, tillægges derimod kun den betydning, at arbejdstageren bevarer de rettigheder, som han har erhvervet som følge af forudgående beskæftigelsesperioder.
Periods of unemployment and long absences on account of sickness, which are not treated as periods of legal employment, are taken into account only in order to ensure that rights acquired by the worker as the result of preceding periods of employment are preserved.
Disse bestemmelser sikrer således kun en ret til fortsat beskæftigelse og forudsætter
Consequently, the provisions of Article 6(2) merely ensure the continuation of the right to employment and necessarily presuppose fitness to continue working, even if only after a temporary interruption.
Da der ikke som i traktatens artikel 48, stk. 3, litra d), og i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1251/70 af 29. juni 1970 om arbejdstageres ret til at blive boende på en medlemsstats område efter at have haft beskæftigelse dér, findes
In contrast, the German, Greek and Netherlands Governments and the United Kingdom are at one in considering that, in the absence of any express provision on the subject, along the lines of Article 48(3)(d) of the Treaty and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1251/70 of 29 June 1970 on the rights of workers to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State, Turkish workers must be regarded as not entitled to claim the right to remain. The consequences of any permanent
nødvendigvis, at den pågældendes erhvervsevne fortsat er til stede, også efter en midlertidig afbrydelse.
by Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 as a corollary of legal employment, ceases to exist if the person concerned becomes totally and permanently incapacitated for work.
sig på en medlemsstats område efter at have haft beskæftigelse dér, følger det indirekte, men utvivlsomt, af artikel 6 i afgørelse nr. 1/80, at den tyrkiske statsborgers ret til ophold—der har form af et accessorium til udøvelsen af en lovlig beskæftigelse - bortfalder, såfremt den pågældende er blevet fuldstændigt og varigt arbejdsudygtig.
work. It does not, on the other hand, cover the situation of a Turkish worker who has definitively ceased to belong to the labour force of a Member State because he has, for example, reached retirement age or, as in the present case, become totally and permanently incapacitated for work.
Bestemmelsen omfatter derimod ikke en tyrkisk statsborger, der endeligt har forladt arbejdsmarkedet i en medlemsstat, f.eks. fordi han har nået pensionsalderen eller, som i det foreliggende tilfælde, fordi han er blevet fuldstændigt og varigt arbejdsudygtig.
Consequently, in the absence of any specific provision conferring on Turkish workers a right to remain in the territory of a Member State after working there, a Turkish national's right of residence, as implicitly but necessarily guaranteed
For si vidt angår EF-arbejdsugere bemærkes endvidere, at der ifølge traktatens artikel 48, stk. 3, litra d), kan fastsættes vilkår for en sådan opholdsret i en kommissionsforordning, således at det ikke uden videre er muligt at overføre den ordning, der gælder i henhold til artikel 48, på tyrkiske arbejdsugere.
Furthermore, as far as Community workers are concerned, the conditions under which such a right to remain may be exercised were, under Article 48(3)(d) of the Treaty, made subject to regulations to be drawn up by the Commission, with the result that the rules applicable under Article 48 cannot simply be transposed to Turkish workers.
Ved afgørelsen af, om en tyrkisk arbejdstager, der har været beskæftiget som international chauffør, har haft lovlig beskæftigelse i en medlemsstat efter artikel 6, stk 1, i afgørelse nr. 1/80 af 19. september 1980 fra det Associeringsråd, som blev oprettet ved aftalen om oprettelse af en associering mellem Det Europaaske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Tyrkiet, undertegnet i Ankara den 12. september 1963 og godkendt på Fællesskabels vegne ved Rådets afgørelse 64/732/EØF af 23. december 1963, tilkommer det den nationale ret at tage stilling til, om den pågældendes arbejdsforhold har en tilstrækkelig snæver tilknytning til denne medlemsstats område, navnlig under hensyn til ansættelsessted, det geografiske udgangspunkt for udøvelsen af den erhvervsmæssige aktivitet og den nationale arbejds- og sociallovgivning, der regulerer forholdet
In order to ascertain whether a Turkish worker employed as an international lorrydriver belongs to the legitimate labour force of a Member State, for the purposes of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 of the Association Council established by ike agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed on 12 September 1963 in Ankara and approved on behalf of tlte Community by Council Decision 64/732)'EEC of 23 December 1963, it is for the national court to determine whether the applicant's employment relationship retained a sufficiently close link with the territory of the Member State, Û.«4 in so doing to take account, in particular, of the place where he was hired, the territory on which the paid employment is based and the applicable national legislation in the field of employment and social security law.
Lovlig beskæftigelse i en medlemsstat efter artikel 6, stk 1, i afgørelse nr. 1180, kan foreligge, selv om en tyrkisk arbejdstager ikke i medfør af den relevante nationale lovgivning behøver en arbejds- eller opholdstilladelse fra myndighederne i værtsstaten for at udøve erhvervsmæssig beskæftigelse, samt at en sådan beskæftigelse uundgåeligt indebærer, at arbejdstageren har opholdsret
Ttie existence of legal employment in a Member State within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80, cäed above, can be established in the case of a Turkish worker who was not required by the national legislation concerned to hold a work penni' or c, residence permit issued by the authorities in the host State in order to cany out his ïsorL Træ fact that such employment exists necessarily implies the ■recog'uium of a. right of residence f or the person concerned.
Artikel 6, stk 2, i afgørelse nr. 1/80 giver ikke en tyrkisk statsborger, der har udøvet lovlig beskæftigelse i en medlemsstat, ret til ophold på denne medlemsstats område, efter at han har været udsat for en arbejdsulykke og som følge deraf er blevet varigt arbejdsudygtig.·
Ankle 6(2) of Decision No 1/80 does not confer on a Turkish national who has belonged to the legitimate labour force of a Member State the right to remain in the territory of that State following an accident at work rendering him permanently incapacitated for work.'
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslap til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 28. marts 1995.
Advocate General Elmer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 28 March 1995.
»- De kriterier, Domstolen har opstillet i dom af 27. september 1989 i sag 9/88, M. Lopes da Veiga, skal anvendes tilsvarende ved fortolkningen af begrebet 'beskæftigelse ... i... medlemsstat' i artikel 6, stk. 1, i afgørelse nr. 1/80 fra det associeringsråd, der er oprettet ved associeringsaftalen mellem EØF og Tyrkiet.
The criteria laid down by the Court in the Lopes da Veiga judgment must be correspondingly applied as regards the interpretation of the concept of 'employment... in that Member State' in Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council established by the Agreement of Association between the EEC and Turkey.
Det tilkommer den nationale ret at afgøre, om Ahmet Bozkurt's arbejdsforhold har en tilstrækkelig snæver tilknytning til nederlandsk territorium, idet der bl.a. skal Uges udgangspunkt i følgende omstændigheder: Bozkurt har haft ansættelse i et nederlandsk firma; ansættelseskontrakten var indgået på nederlandsk og reguleret af nederlandsk ret; han kørte nederlandsk indregistrerede lastbiler og var omfattet af det nederlandske socialsystem, og efter at være blevet permanent uarbejdsdygtig ved en arbejdsulykke moduger han således nu en ydelse fra Nederlandene; han opholdt sig i Nederlandene i perioderne mellem sine rejser samt i sine ferier.
It is for the national court to decide whether Ahmet Bozkurt's relationship of employment has a sufficiently close link with Netherlands territory, whereby the following circumstances inter alia should be regarded as the basis: Ahmet Bozkurt was employed by a Netherlands firm; the contract of employment was concluded in Dutch and governed by Netherlands law, he drove lorries registered in the Netherlands and was covered by the Netherlands social security system, and after becoming permanently incapacitated for work he now receives benefit from the Netherlands; he has resided in the Netherlands in the periods between his journeys and during his holidays.
- Udtrykket 'lovlig' beskæftigelse i en medlemsstat i artikel 6, stk. 1, i associeringsrådets afgørelse nr. 1/80 henviser til de enkelte medlemsstaters lovgivning om, under hvilke betingelser det er lovligt, henholdsvis ulovligt, at udøve sådan beskæftigelse, og herunder have ophold på den pågældende medlemsstats territorium, uden at stille krav om, at beskæftigelsen skal udøves i henhold til formel arbejds- og/eller opholdstilladelse.
The expression 'legal' employment in a Member State within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 refers to the individual Member State's legislation as to the conditions in which it is legal or, as the case may be, illegal to be thus employed and consequently to be resident in the territory of the Member State in question, without laying down any requirement that the employment shall be pursued subject to a formal work and/or residence permit
- Artikel 6 i associeringsrådets afgørelse nr. 1/80 giver ikke tyrkiske statsborgere, som er blevet permanent uarbejdsdygtige, ret til fortsat ophold i en medlemsstat.«
Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council does not give Turkish nationals who have become permanently incapacitated for work the right of continued residence in a Member State.'
Præjudiciel •Bananer — importordning — kategorien nye erhvervsdrivende* (Sjette Afdeling) om EF's
Preliminary ruling (Bananas — Import arrangements — Category of new operators)
Selskabet anfægtede samtlige afgørelser om tildeling og samtlige importlicenser, som allerede var truffet, henholdsvis udstedt af Bundesamt, for
The company lodged an objection with the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main against all the allocation notices and import licences which had already been issued by the Bundesamt.
Under sagen gjorde selskabet gældende, at kun erhvervsdrivende, som allerede har indført bananer, før de indgiver deres ansøgning, kan gøre krav på at blive anerkendt som erhvervsdrivende i kategori C i gennemførelsesforordningens artikel 2, litra c)'s forsund.
operators who had already imported bananas prior to submission of their application were entitled to claim the status of Category C operators for the purposes of Article 2(c) of the implementing regulation.
Enhver anden fortolkning ville umuliggøre en økonomisk rationel indførsel af bananer og ville give mulighed for, at der blev udstedt licenser til «stråmænd«.
Any other interpretation, it argued, would render impossible any commercially viable importation of bananas and would allow licences to be issued to 'men of straw*.
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
In support of its submissions, it argued that only
Definitionen af erhvervsdrivende i kategori C i artikel 2, titra c), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 af 10. juni 1993 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser f or EF's importordning for bananer er ikke forskellig fra definitionen i artikel 19, stk 1, litra c), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 af 13. februar 1993 om den fælles markedsordning f or bananer.
The definition of Category C operators contained in Article 2(c) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 of 10 June 1993 laying down detailed rules for the application of the arrangements f or importing bananas into the Community does not differ from that contained in Article 19(l)(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas.
Artikel 19, stk 1, titra c), i forordning nr. 404/93 og artikel 2, titra c), i forordning nr. 1442/93 skal fortolkes således, at den erhvervsdrivende ikke allerede skal have udøvet virksomhed med markedsføring afhananer på det tidspunkt, hvor han ansøger om at blive registreret i kategori C
Article I9(l)(c) of Regulation No 404/93 and Article 2(c) of Regulation No 1442/93 are to be interpreted as meaning that, when applying for registration under Category Q an operator must not already have developed an activity aimed at marketing bananas.
Artikel 19, stk 1, lura c), i forordning nr. 404/93 og artikel 2, titra c), i forordning nr. 1442/93 skal fortolkes således, at en erhvervsdrivende kan anmode om at blive registreret i kategori C, selv om han har til hensigt at overdrage importlicensen til en tredjemand.
Article 19(l)(c) of Regulation No 404/93 and Article 2(c) of Regulation No 1442/93 are to be interpreted as meaning that an operator may apply for registration under Category C even if he intends to transfer the import licence to a third party.
Artikel 3, stk 2, i forordning nr. 1442/93, som udelukker virksomheder, der driver engros- og detailhandel, fru begrebet erhvervsdrivende, finder ikke anvendelse på begrebet erhvervsdrivende i denne forordnings artikel 2, titm c).*
Article 3(2) of Regulation No 1442/93, which provides that wholesalers and retailers are not to be regarded as operators, is not applicable to the concept of operator within the meaning of Article 2(c) ofthat regulation:
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling)) den 23. marts 1995.
Advocate General Elmer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 23 March 1995.
»— Artikel 19, stk. 1, litra c), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer og artikel 2, litra c), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for EFs importordning for bananer skal fortolkes således, at de af disse bestemmelser omfattede erhvervsdrivende i 1992 eller senere skal have nedsat sig eller ved indgivelse af ansøgning om importlicens have tilkendegivet, at de agter at nedsætte sig som handlende inden for banansektoren.
An operator's entry into business prior to 1992 with a view to importing bananas in 1992 or later is not in itself sufficient to justify a finding that the operator in question, prior to 1992, 'marketed' bananas within the meaning attached to that expression by the above regulations so far as concerns Category A and Β operators, and the operator in question can if appropriate be registered in Category C, provided that the other relevant conditions have been satisfied.
- En ansøgning om importlicens kan ikke afslås under henvisning til, at ansøgeren har indgivet ansøgningen alene med det formål at overdrage licensen til en anden.
Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 is not applicable to operators coming under Article 2(c) of that regulation.'
- Artikel 3, stk. 2, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 finder ikke anvendelse på erhvervsdrivende, der omfattes af artikel 2, litra c), i samme forordning.«
Preliminary ruling (Social security for migrant workers — Council Regulation No 1408/71 — Worker residing in a Member State other than the competent State — Benefits in kind for members of the worker's family in the State of residence)
Sag C-451/93
(Sixth Chamber)
Præjudiciel •Social sikring af vandrende arbejdstagere og selvstændige erhvervsdrivende — Rådets forordning nr. 1408/71 — arbejdstager bosat i en anden medlemsstat end den kompetente stat — naturalydelser til familiemedlemmer i bopælsstaten* (Sjette Afdeling)
By order of 15 October 1993, received at the Court on 25 November 1993, the Landessozialgericht für das Saarland submitted for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 1(f), 2(1), 3(1), 19(l)(a) and (2), and 20 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Spørgsmålet er rejst i forbindelse med en retssag mellem en fransk statsborger, Claudine Délavant, og Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse für das Saarland (herefter benævnt »AOK«) angående hendes børns ret til naturalydelser.
The question arose in proceedings between a French national, Claudine Délavant, and the Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse für das Saarland (Local General Sickness Fund, Saarland) ('the AOK') concerning her children's entitlement to benefits in kind.
Ved kendelse af 15. oktober 1993, indgået til Domstolen den 25. november 1993, har Landessozialgericht für das Saarland forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 1, litra f), artikel 2, stk. 1, artikel 3, stk. 1, artikel 19, stk. 1, litra a), og artikel 19, stk. 2, samt artikel 20 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
However, the AOK refused to accede to Mrs Delavant's request for a declaration that her children \ > ν entitled, irrespective of their parents' income, to receive from the AOK, as the institution of the place of residence, benefits in kind as if they were insured with it. Following the dismissal by the Sozialgericht für das Saarland (Social Court, Saarland) of her action challenging that decision, Mrs Délavant
Délavant har lønnet beskæftigelse i Frankrig (Metz) og er som følge heraf tilsluttet
Mrs Délavant is employed in France (Metz) and by virtue of that employment is affiliated to the Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie (Local Sickness Insurance Fund) in Metz.
denne behandles, at undersøge, hvorvidt antagelse kan lægges til grund.
expense of the State in which he works, benefits in kind provided by the institution of his place of residence within the limits and in accordance with the provisions of the legislation administered by that institution as if he were insured with it.
Délavant er gift med en tysker og parret har to mindreårige døtre. Familien er bosat i Tyskland (Saarbrücken).
She has based her appeal in particular on Article 19(2) of the regulation, which in her view also entitles her children to benefits in kind provided by the AOK on behalf of the French institution without the provisions of domestic German law restricting that entitlement by reference to the level of their parents' income.
Indledningsvis bemærkes, at efter forordningens artikel 13, stk. 2, litra a), er en person, der har lønnet beskæftigelse på en medlemssuts område, principielt omfattet af denne stats lovgivning, selv om han er bosat på en anden medlemsstats område.
The Landessozialgericht is not itself in doubt that Article 19(2) of the regulation, in conjunction with Article 1(f) thereof, refers to German social-security legislation and that the relevant provision in that legislation lays down, as a condition for social-security cover for members of the affiliated person's family, the income of the parents.
Derimod efterkom AOK ikke Delevant's anmodning om en erklæring om, at hendes børn har ret til naturalydelser fra AOK i dennes egenskab af bopælsstedets institution, som om de var forsikret der, og uafhængigt af forældrenes indkomst.
The national court is, however, uncertain whether application of that provision is compatible with Community law.
Dette princip er - for så vidt angår sygeforsikring - blevet gennem før t ved forordningens artikel 19. Således fremgår det af artikel tí, stk. 1, at en arbejdsuger, der er bosat i en anden medlemss t a t end beskæftigelsesstaten, er omfattet af lovgivningen i sidstnævnte stat for sil vidt angår betingelserne for at erhverve ret til ydelser.
Furthermore, pursuant to Article 19(2), the provisions of Article 19(1) are applicable by analogy to members of the family of the worker who reside in the territory of a Member State other than the competent State, as specified above, in so far as they are not entitled to sickness benefits under the legislation of the State in whose territory they reside.
Når en sådan ret er erhvervet, har arbejdsugeren i sin bopælsstat, og for beskæftigelsesstøtens regning, ret til na t uralydelser, der ydes af institutionen på bopælsstedet med de begrænsninger og på de betingelserne, som er foreskrevet i den for institutionen gældende lovgivning, som om arbejdstagere var forsikret der.
Subject to that latter proviso, it follows that members of the family of the worker are subject to the legislation of the State in which that person works so far as concerns the conditions of their entitlement to receive benefits; once that entitlement is recognized, they have the right to receive, at the expense of the State in which the person works, benefits in kind provided by the institution of their place of residence within the limits and in accordance with the provisions of the legislation administered by that institution.
Efter at Sozialgericht Saarland ikke havde givet Délavant medhold i den sag, hun anlagde til prøvelse af denne afgørelse, ankede hun sagen til Landessozialgericht für das Saarland.
The national court is proceeding on the assumption that the applicable legislation for replying to the question whether members of the worker's family are entitled to benefits in kind is that of the family's State of residence and not that of the State in which the person works and in which the institution with which that person is insured is situated.
Ifølge Landessozialgericht er det klart, at forordningens artikel 19, stk. 2, sammenholdt med artikel 1, litra f), henviser til den tyske sociallovgivning, og at den relevante bestemmelse i denne lovgivning bl.a. gør den sociale sikring af den forsikredes familiemedlemmer betinget af forældrenes indkomst.
It should be recalled at the outset that, by virtue of Article 13(2)(a) of the regulation, a person employed in the territory of one Member State is in principle subject to the legislation of that State even it he resides in the territory of another Member State.
I henhold til artikel 19, stk. 2, finder bestemmelserne i stk. 1 endvidere tilsvarende anvendelse på familiemedlemmer, der er bosat i en anden medlemsstat end den kompetente sut, som defineret ovenfor, for så vidt de pågældende ikke er berettiget til sygeforsikringsydelser i medfør af lovgivningen i bopælsstaten.
According to the interpretation of Article 19(2) proposed by the referring court and advocated by the Belgian, German, Netherlands and French Governments, as well as by the Commission, Article 19(2) refers back to Article 19(1) as regards the persons already recognized as members of the worker's family.