natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Christian Poucet og Daniel Pistre havde i disse sager gjort indsigelse mod pålæg, der var givet til dem, om betaling af socialsikringsbidrag til nogle nærmere bestemte sygekasser.
In those cases, Messrs Poucet and Pistre objected to demands served on them for payment of social security contributions due from them to certain sickness insurance schemes.
De bestred ikke princippet om obligatorisk med lemskab af en social sikringsordning, men gjorde gældende, at de med henblik herpå skulle kunne henvende sig frit til ethvert privat forsikringsselskab, der er etableret på Fællesskabets område, og ikke var forpligtet til at underkaste sig betingelser, der ensidigt var fastsat af sygekasserne. Disse havde ifølge sagsøgerne en dominerende stilling, som var i strid med Traktatens bestemmelser om fri konkurrence.
They did not contest the principle of the obligation to be insured but contended that, in order to fulfil that obligation, they should be free to join any private insurance undertaking established within the territory of the Community and not be obliged to become subject to the conditions laid down unilaterally by sickness insurance schemes which enjoyed a dominant position, contrary to the rules on competition laid down in the Treaty.
Domstolen bemærkede hertil, at det fremgår af dens praksis, at begrebet virksomhed inden for konkurrenceretten omfatter enhver enhed, som udøver økonomisk virksomhed, uanset denne enheds retlige status og dens finansieringsmåde.
The Court noted in this connection that, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, in the context of competition law, the concept of "undertaking" included any body which carries on a commercial activity, irrespective of the legal status of that body and of its means of financing.
Sygekasserne og de organer, der medvirker ved administrationen af den of fentlige socialsikring, har en rent social funktion. Denne virksomhed bygger på princippet om national solidaritet og drives ikke med vinding for øje.
Sickness insurance schemes or bodies entrusted with the management of a social security scheme as a public service fulfil an exclusively social function.
De udbetalte ydelser er fastlagt i lovgivningen og er uafhængige af det beløb, der er betalt i bidrag.
The benefits which are paid out are statutory benefits and are independent of the amount of the contributions.
Denne virksomhed er således ikke af økonomisk karakter, og de organer, der udfører den, er ikke virksomheder i henhold til Traktatens artikel 85 og 86.
It followed that that activity was not an economic activity and consequently the bodies entrusted with it did not constitute undertakings within the meaning of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty.
"Begrebet virksomhed i EØF-Traktatens artikel 85 og 86 omfatter ikke organer som i de forelæggelsesdommene beskrevne, der varetager administrationen af særlige sociale sikringsordninger."
"The concept of 'undertaking', within the meaning of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty, does not cover the bodies entrusted with the management of soci al security schemes, such as those described in the orders for reference."
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 29. september 1992.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 29 September 1992.
Ved stævning indleveret den 2. juli 1991 havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Traktatens artikel 119, subsidiært Rådets direktiv 76/207/EØF, idet der i Belgien opretholdes en lovgivning, hvorefter kvindelige arbejdstagere over 60 år ikke kan opnå supplerende fratrædelsesgodtgørelser.
By an application received at the Court on 2 July 1991 the Commission brought an action for a declaration that, by maintaining in force legislation which renders female workers who have attained the age of 60 ineligible for a supplementary allowance payable upon redundancy, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 119 of the EEC Treaty and, in the alternative, under Council Directive 76/207/EEC.
Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Traktatens artikel 119 ved at opretholde en lovgivning, hvorefter kvindelige arbejdstagere over 60 år ikke kan opnå de supplerende fratrædelsesgodtgørelser, som omhandlet i den kollektive overenskomst nr. 17, der er gjort bindende ved kongelig anordning af 16. januar 1975.
By maintaining in force legislation which renders female workers who have attained the age of 60 ineligible for a supplementary allowance payable upon redundancy, provided for by Collective Labour Agreement No 17, which was given the force of 1 ay by Royal Decree of 16 January 1975, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obi i gati ons under Article 119 of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 2. december 1992.
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 2 December 1992.
Forslaget lød:
He proposed that the Court should:
Det fastslås, at Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 119 ved at opretholde en lovgivning, hvorefter kvindelige arbejdstagere over 60 år ikke kan opnå supplerende fratrædelsesgodtgørelser, som mandlige arbejdstagere i samme situation har ret til.
declare that, by maintaining in force legislation which renders female workers who have attained the age of 60 ineligible for a supplementary allowance payable upon redundancy in supplementary where a male worker in the same position would be entitled to that allowance, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 119 of the Treaty.
Præjudiciel "Fri bevægelighed for personer" (Anden Afdeling)
order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs."
Mens hun boede i Tyskland, fik hun af den sagsøgte institution udbetalt pension til børn, der har mistet begge forældre eller en af dem.
The applicant is the orphan of a salaried worker who had completed periods of insurance both in Germany and in Italy. For as long as she lived in Germany, the LVAS granted her an orphan's pension.
Efter at sagsøgeren var vendt tilbage til Italien, blev denne pension ikke længere udbetalt med den begrundelse, at det for fremtiden påhvilede den kompetente italienske institution (INPS) at udbetale ydelsen.
When the plaintiff returned to Italy, that pension was no longer paid on the ground that payment of that benefit was now the responsibility of the competent Italian institution (INPS).
Sidstnævnte institution ydede sagsøgerens moder et beløb, som omfattede pensionen til den efterlevende ægtefælle, den pension, som skulle betales til barnet, og familietillægget i henhold til den italienske lovgivning, idet beløbet blev forhøjet til mindstepensionen i henhold til loven.
The INPS granted the plaintiff's mother an amount which included the survivor's pension, the orphan's pension and the family supplement provided for by the relevant Italian legislation, increased to the statutory minimum pension.
Senere ydede sagsøgte sagsøgeren et beløb svarende til forskellen mellem pensionen til børn af afdøde arbejdstagere beregnet efter tysk lov og de samlede ydelser til sådanne børn, som efter sagsøgtes beregninger skulle betales af INPS.
Subsequently the LVAS granted the plaintiff a supplement which corresponded to the difference between the orphan's pension calculated on the basis of German legal provisions and the orphan's total pension payable, according to its calculations, by the INPS.
Efter sagsøgtes opfattelse svarede disse ydelser til fami li etil lægget og 25% af efterladtepensionen og pensionen til barnet.
According to the LVAS, those benefits were equal to the sum of the family supplement and an amount representing 25% of the total of survivor's pension and the orphan's pension.
Sagsøgeren gjorde for den forelæggende ret gældende, at familietillægget ikke var en del af pensionen til barnet af den afdøde arbejdstager, men en selv stændig ydelse, som generelt udbetales til børn, hvad enten de har mistet en af forældrene eller ej, og at der derfor ikke skulle tages hensyn til dette famili etil læg ved beregningen af det af sagsøgte ydede tillæg.
The plaintiff considered that the family supplement did not constitute part of the orphan's pension, but an autonomous benefit granted to children in general, whether they are orphans or not and claimed before the national court that the supplement paid by the defendant should be calculated after deduction of the said family supplement.
"Artikel 78, stk. 2, litra b), nr. i), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som kodificeret ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/82 af 2. juni 1983, skal fortolkes således, at den kompetente institution ved beregningen af et i henhold til bestemmelsen skyldigt tillæg skal tage hensyn til fami lietillægget og den del af den samlede efterladtepension, der er ydet den efterladte ægtefælle til den vandrende arbejdstager, og som efter lovgivningen i den medlemsstat, hvor barnet har bopæl, er bestemt til barnets underhold.
"Article 78(2)(b)(i) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as consolidated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, must be interpreted as meaning that , for the purposes of calculating supplementary benefits payable under that provision, the competent institution must take into account the family supplement and the fraction of the survivor's pension paid to the migrant worker's surviving spouse which, under the legislation of the Member State in which the orphan is resident, is intended for the orphan's maintenance.
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 26. november 1992.
In contrast, the increase provided for by the legislation of the Member State of residence in order to bring the survivor's pension up to the level of the statutory minimum pension applicable in that State is not to be taken into
- 8 afdøde arbejdstager kan have ret til efter lovgivningen i en anden medlemsstat - skal der tages hensyn til den del af den samlede efterladtepension, der er ydet den efterladte ægtefælle, og som efter lovgivningen i bopælsmedlemsstaten er bestemt til barnets underhold.
consideration by the competent institution for the purposes of that calculation in so far as the migrant worker's surviving spouse is entitled to that increase irrespective of whether she has dependent children, whether or not they are orphans."
Det beløb, hvormed efter ladtepensionen i henhold til lovgivningen i bopælsmedlemsstaten forhøjes for at nå den i medlemsstaten gældende mindstepension, skal dog ikke tages i betragtning ved den pågældende beregning, i det mindste for så vidt som forhøjelsen sker uafhængigt af, om den efterladte ægtefælle har et eller flere børn, der skal forsørges.
The amount provided for by the legislation of the Member State of residence in order to bring the survivor's pension up to the level of the statutory minimum pension applicable in that State is not to be taken into consideration for the purposes of that calculation, at the very least in so far as that increase is arrived at irrespective of whether the surviving spouse has one or more dependent children.
Der skal ved beregningen af det nævnte tillæg tages hensyn til alle ydelser, som faktisk er udredt til barnets underhold i bopælsmedlemsstaten, uanset deres karakter og betegnelse og den kompetente institution, i det omfang der er tale om ydelser i henhold til artikel 78, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71."
For the purposes of calculating the abovementioned benefit supplement, all the benefits which have already been effectively paid in the Member State of residence for the purpose of the orphan's maintenance, whatever their nature, must be taken into account, in so far as they concern benefits within the meaning of Article 78(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71."
Ved kendelse af 14. august 1991, indgået til Domstolen den 7. november samme år, havde Finanzgericht Hamburg (Tyskland) stillet et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af en række bestemmelser.
By order of 14 August 1991, which was received at the Court Registry on 7 November 1991, the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of certain provisions.
Merck eksporterer C-vitamin fremstillet af glukose, som udvindes af sakkarose (hvidt sukker) til tredjelande.
Merck exports to non-member countries vitamin C manufactured from glucose obtained from sucrose (white sugar).
Denne glukose forarbejdes til sorbitol, som anvendes til at fremstille de udførte varer.
The glucose is processed into sorbitol which is used to manufacture the goods for export.
selv hvis sorbitolet er udvundet af glukose, som er fremstillet af hvidt sukker."
The Hauptzollamt has refused 106 applications by Merck for refund on the ground that, according to footnote 7 of annex C of the regulation, no export refund is to be granted where, as in the present case, sorbitol is not obtained directly from saccharose, but from glucose.
Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tred.ie Afdeling) den 9. iuli 1992.
Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 9 July 1992.
Han foreslog at besvare spørgsmålet således:
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
"Artikel 3, stk. 1, 2 og 3 i forordning nr. 3035/80 og note 7 til bilag C, som blev indsat i forordning nr. 3035/80 ved forordning nr. 2036/86, skal fortolkes således, at de ikke er til hinder for, at der udbetales eksportrestitution for C-vitamin (askorbinsyre), der er fremstillet af sorbitol, på grundlag af de restitutionssatser, der er fastsat for sukker, når sorbitolet er fremstillet af glukose, der er fremstillet af hvidt sukker."
"The combined provisions of Article 3(1)(2) and (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3035/80, and footnote 7 in Annex C which was added to Regulation (EEC) No 3035/80 by Regulation No 2036/86 must be interpreted as meaning that export refunds are to be granted for vitamin C (ascorbic acid) manufactured from sorbitol, at the rates laid down in respect of sugar, where the sorbitol is obtained from glucose produced from white sugar."
Ved dom af 5. maj 1992, indgået til Domstolen den 14. maj s.a., havde Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 51 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
By order of 5 May 1992, which was received at the Court Registry on 17 May 1992, the Tribunal du Travail de Bruxelles referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 51 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Bogana, der er italiensk statsborger, har arbejdet som arbejdstager i både Italien og Belgien.
Mr Bogana, an Italian citizen, worked as a salaried worker in Italy and Belgium.
Da han blev uarbejdsdygtig fik han i begge disse stater til kendt invaliditetsydelser, idet den belgiske ydelse blev fastsat af den kompetente institution til den fulde belgiske ydelse med fradrag af den forholdsmæssigt beregnede italienske ydelse.
When he became incapable of working, he became entitled in both States to invalidity benefits, the Belgian invalidity payment having been calculated by the competent institution as being an amount equal to the full Belgian benefit, less the Italian benefit on a pro-rata basis.
- 10 - ved en beregning efter reglerne i forordningens artikel 46, herunder antikumulationsreglen i stk. 3, skal reguleres i henhold til forordningens artikel 51 og ikke i henhold til de nationale retsregler, såfremt disse bestemmer, at der skal ske en fornyet beregning af den nationale ydelse ved sådanne ændringer i den ydelse, der betales af en anden medlemsstat, som navnlig skyldes udsving i de gennemsnitlige vekselkurser eller den økonomiske og sociale udvikling i den ne stat."
"An invalidity benefit provided by a Member State to a migrant worker and paid on the basis of Articles 40 and 46 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, the amount of which, when calculated under the rules of national law, including its provisions against overlapping, is equal to the amount calculated under the rules laid down in Article 46 of that regulation, including the rule against overlapping contained in Article 46(3), must be adjusted in accordance with Article 51 of that regulation and not pursuant to the provisions of national law, where the latter provide for a recalculation of the national benefit in order to take account of variations in a benefit accorded by another Member State which are attributable in particuiar to fluctuations in average exchange rates or the general evolution of the economic and social situation in that State."
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling) den 28. .januar 1993.
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 28 January 1993.
Generaladvokaten foreslog Domstolen at besvare det forelagte spørgsmål således:
He proposed that the question should be answered as follows:
"Artikel 51 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger for arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, skal fortolkes således, at når en ydelse er blevet beregnet i henhold til national lovgivning, som bl.a. indeholder en antikumulationsregel, og denne beregning giver samme resultat som ved anvendelsen af artikel 46, stk. 3, i forordning nr. 1408/71, kan ydelsen ikke nedsættes efterfølgende på grundlag af en ændring i værdien af en ydelse udbetalt i en anden medlemsstat, hvis denne ændring skyldes en justering som følge af den økonomiske og sociale udvikling eller udsving i vekselkurserne.II II
"Article 51 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community must be interpreted as meaning that, where a benefit has been calculated under national legislation, including a rule against the overlapping of benefits, and that calculation produces the same result as Article 46(3) of Regulation No 1408/71, the benefit may not subsequently be reduced so as to take into account a change in the value of a benefit paid in another Member state if that change is due to an adaptation made on account of the general evolution of the economic and social situation or if it results from variations in the exchange rate."
Forenede sager T-7/93 R og T-9/93 R Langnese-Iglo og Scholler Lebensmittel mod Kommissionen
Joined Cases T-7/93 R and T-9/93 Langnese-Iglo and Schol 1er Lebensmittel ν
19.2.1993 Konkurrence - særlige rettergangsformer - intervention - fortrolighed - foreløbige forholdsregler
(Competition - Proceedings on the application for interim measures -Intervention - Confidentiality - Interim measures)
Ved stævninger indgivet den 19. og 20. januar 1993 havde Langnese-Iglo og Scholler anlagt to sager med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 23. december 1992 om en procedure i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 85.
By applications received at the Court on 19 and 20 January 1993, Langnese-Iglo and Schöller brought an action for the annulment of the Commission decision of 23 December 1992 concerning a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty.
Ved særskilte processkrifter indgået samtidig havde sagsøgerne endvidere fremsat begæring om udsættelse af gennemførelsen af Kommissionens beslutning, ind til Retten havde truffet afgørelse i hovedsagerne.
By separate documents which were received at the Court Registry on 19 and 20 January, those companies also requested that enforcement of the decision addressed to them by the Commission be stayed until the Court of First Instance had ruled on the substance of the case.
Ved begæringer indgået den 3. februar 1993 havde Mars GmbH fremsat begæring om tilladelse til at indtræde i sagerne T-7/93 R og T-9/93 R til støtte for Kommissionens påstande.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 3 February 1993 Mars GmbH applied to intervene in Cases T-7/93 and T-9/93 R in support of the form of order sought by the Commission.
Rettens præsident bestemte:
Instance made the following
Det tillades Mars at indtræde i sagerne T-7/93 R og T-9/93 R til støtte for sagsøgtes påstande.
Mars is granted leave to intervene in Cases T-7/93 and T-9/93 R in support of the form of order sought by the defendant;
De af Langnese og Schöller fremsatte begæringer om fortrolig behandling af visse oplysninger i deres begæringer om udsættelse af gennemførelsen tages til følge under behandlingen af disse.
The request submitted by Langnese and by Scholier that certain aspects of the information contained in their request of a stay of enforcement are to be treated with confidentiality in the course of proceedings on the application for interim measures is to be granted;
Sagerne T-7/93 R og T-9/93 R forenes med henblik på behandlingen af begæringerne om udsættelse af gennemførelsen.
Cases T-7/93 and T-9/93 R shall proceedings;
Langnese og Schöller kan fortsat over for hinanden gøre salgsstedseksklusiviteten gældende, indtil Retten har truffet afgørelse i hovedsagerne. sagerne.
Langnese and Schöl 1er shall be able to continue to be able to enforce each against the other the clauses relating to the exclusive right of sale from retail outlets until the Court of First Instance delivers its judgment in the main proceedings;
Det skal fremgå af de meddelelser, der efter de anfægtede beslutningers artikel 3 skal gives til videreforhandlerne, at i henhold til denne kendelse kan den eksklusive købsforpligtelse påberåbes over for Langnese eller Schol 1er.
The communications provided for in Article 3 of the contested decisions must inform resellers that in application of this Order the exclusive purchasing agreements may be relied upon against Langnese and Schöl1er;
I øvrigt tages begæringerne om udsættelse af gennemførelsen ikke til følge.
For the rest, the application for a stay of enforcement is refused;
Traktatbrud - undladelse af at træffe de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at opfylde Domstolens dom i sag 1/86 - Rådets direktiv 80/68/EØF - beskyttelse af grundvandet mod forurening
Failure to fulfil obligations - Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 1/86 - Council Directive 80/68/EEC - Protection of ground waters against pollution
Generaladvokat C. Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 16. februar 1993.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 16 February 1993.
Han foreslog Domstolen at give Kommissionen medhold i dens påstand og at dømme Kongeriget Belgien til at afholde sagens omkostninger.
He proposed that the Court should uphold the Commission's application and order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.
Fortolkning af artikel 11 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 823/87 - kvalitetsvine fra bestemte dyrkningsområder - national lovgivning der begrænser den mængde vin, der skal markedsføres, og ikke den mængde, der skal produceres
Interpretation of Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) 823/87 - VQPDR -National legislation restricting quantity of wine to be marketed rather than quantity to be produced.