natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Præjudiciel - Arrondissementsrechtbank te Amsterdam - fortolkning af artikel 50 i aftalen om handelsrelaterede intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder (»TRIPs«), der er optaget som bilag til overenskomsten om oprettelse af Verdenshandelsorganisationen - sag om foreløbige forholdsregler ved en national retsinstans med henblik på at forbyde salg al varemærkeforfalskede varer — foreløbige forholdsregler
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2163/92 of 30 July 1992 on the levying of the additional amount provided for by Regulations (EEC) No 3429/80, (EEC) No 796/81 and (EEC) No 1755/81 adoptingprotective measures applicable to imports of preserved cultivated mushrooms — Principle of proportionality
Præjudiciel — Tribunal de première instance de Namur — fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 5966, 85 og 86 i forhold til regler fastsat af et (internationalt) sportsforbund, hvorefter en sportsudøver skal have tilladelse fra eller være blevet udtaget af det nationale forbund for at kunne deltage i en international turnering -amatørsportsudøver, som aspirerer til at blive professionel eller halvprofessionel — kvindejudo
Action based on an arbitration clause — Insurance contract intended to cover sums paid under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Possibility for the insurer to question the validity of the opinion issued by the medical committee
Præjudiciel — Belgiens Raad van State — fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tv-radiospedningsvirksomhed — personel anvendelsesområde, art. 2 — program,
— order also the defendants to pay default interest, to be calculated according to the rate prescribed by Belgian law from the date on which Van Breda received the Commission's letter dated 6 May 1994;
som specielt er rettet til publikum i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvori virksomheden formelt er etableret landbruget, som bliver arbejdsløse på grund af nedlæggelse af bedriften — fortolkning af artikel 7 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1612/68 om arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed inden for Fællesskabet — social fordel van
Preliminary ruling — Landgericht — Hamburg — Interpretation of Article 85 of the EC Treaty and of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 123/85 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of motor vehicle distribution and servicingagreements—National legislation in the field of competition which requires compartmentalisation of the network in order that members of the network may obtain interdicts prohibiting third parties from distributing the products in question - Difference between networks which are compartmentalised in theory and networks which are compartmentalised in theory and in practice
Præjudiciel — Nederlandenes Raad van State — fortolkning af artikel 4, stk 1, litra g), og stk 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet — anvendelsesområde — ydelser fra »Stichting Ontwikkelings- en Saneringsfonds voor de Landbouw« til arbejdstagere inden for
Preliminary ruling - Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 1(1) of Council Directive 85/577/EEC to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises — Definition of 'consumer' — Contract regarding security governed by German law signed by a natural person, acting in his private capacity, guaranteeing a bank credit granted to a third party
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Informationstjeneste (L-2925 Luxembourg) meã henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
(fewer than 18 hours per week) from benefiting from professional pensions — Interpretation of the "Barber" Protocol with regard to national constitutional and legislative provisions which provide for a retroactive effect — Reverse discrimination
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber, Extended Composition), delivered on 13 December 1995, in Case T-109/94 — Action for the annulment of a decision not to grant a subsidy under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2008/90 concerning the promotion of energy technology in Europe (Thermie Programme) — Obligation to state reasons and to communicate the negative decision in its entirety
Ugen 18. - 22. marts 1996
18 to 22 March 1996
Sag T-230/94 Frederick Farrugia / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Fri bevægelighed for personer
Frederick Farrugia v Commission of the European Communities Freedom of movement for persons
Sag C-297/94 Dominique Bruyère m.fl. / État belge Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Case C-25/94 Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union External relations
Sag T-10/95 Akli Chehab / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Personalesag
Case T-10/95 Akli Chehab v Commission of the European Communities Staff case
KENDELSER
Court of Justice
Sag C-25/94 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union Forbindelser udadtil
Case C-46/95 Commission of the European Communities ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
— Fællesskabet*
Court of Justice
Under Rådets samling (fiskeri) den 22. november 1993 »bekræftede Rådet Corcper's beslutning«.
Case C-25/94 Commission of the European Communities ν Council of the European Union External relations
Rådet og Kommissionen har den 19. december 1991 indgået en ordning »vedrørende forberedelse af FAO-møder samt erklæringer og afstemninger« (herefter »ordningen«).
Right to vote — Member States — Community)
Selv hvis Rådet antages at have vedtaget en formel beslutning, var den en bekræftelse af Coreper's tidligere beslutning.
(FAO — Fishery agreement (Full Court)
Ordningen indeholderen koordineringsprocedure mellem Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne med hensyn til ansvaret for og erklæringer til det enkelte punkt.
The Arrangement sets up a coordination procedure between the Commission and the Member States to decide on the exercise of responsibilities or on statements on a particular point.
FAO havde udarbejdet et udkast til »aftale om valg af flag til højsøfiskerfartøjer med henblik på sikring af, at internationale bevarings- og forvaltningsforanstaltninger respekteres«.
A draft 'Agreement on the Flagging of Vessels Fishing on the High Seas to Promote Compliance with Internationally Agreed Conservation and Management Measures' was drawn up within the FAO.
Det fremgår af disse bestemmelser, at Coreper ikke er en institution i Fællesskabet, der ved traktaten er tillagt egne beføjelser, men at det er et hjælpeorgan for Rådet og varetager forberedende og udøvende funktioner for dette.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 24 January 1994, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for annulment of the decision of the 'Fisheries' Council of 22 November 1993 giving the Member States the right to vote in the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization ('the FAO') for the adoption of the Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas ('the Agreement').
Da medlemsstaterne har kompetence med hensyn til registrering af skibe, foreslog Kommissionen Rådet, at fremgangsmåden ved blandet kompetence blev anvendt til vedtagelse af dette aftaleudkast.
By decision of 26 November 1991, the FAO admitted the European Economic Community as a member, alongside its Member Slates.
Det følger heraf, at Coreper ikke kunne vedtage en beslutning om spørgsmålet om stemmeret den 21. oktober 1993, og at Rådets afstemning .den 22. november 1993 derfor ikke kan anses for at være en bekræftelse af en beslutning, der tidligere var truffet af Coreper.
It none the less proposed a vote by the Community, since the thrust of the agreement fell within the area of conservation and management of fishery resources, for which the Community had competence.
I overensstemmelse med ordningen vedtog Coreper den 16. marts 1993, at stemmeafgivningen skulle foretages af medlemsstaterne.
Whilst the Commission and the Member States acknowledged that this was a matter for shared competence, they disagreed over the question of the right to vote.
Med hensyn til Rådets argument om, at det ikke har vedtaget en retsakt i traktatens artikel 173's forstand, bemærkes, at annullationssøgsmål kan anlægges til prøvelse af enhver af institutionerne udstedt bestemmelse, som tilsigter at skabe retsvirkninger, uanset bestemmelsens karakter og form.
Pursuant to Article 11(5) of lhe Constitution relating to membership by a regional economic integration organization and Rule XLIV of the General Rules, of the FAO, the Community made a declaration specifying that it had exclusive competence in, inter alia, all matters concerning fisheries aimed at protecting Fishing grounds and conserving the biological resources of the sea.
Det bemærkes, at Rådets beslutning har retsvirkninger i flere henseender.
On 16 March 1993, in accordance with the Arrangement, Coreper decided that the Member States should vote.
Den 24. september 1993 foreslog Kommissionen på ny medlemsstaterne, at fremgangsmåden ved blandet kompetence blev anvendt ved vedtagelsen af dette udkast til aftale, således at Fællesskabet havde stemmeretten.
On 19 December 1991, the Council and the Commission concluded an arrangement 'regarding preparation for FAO meetings, statements and voting' ('the Arrangement').
For det første griber Rådets beslutning ved at anerkende, at medlemsstaterne har kompetencen til at træffe den endelige afgørelse om indholdet af aftalen, ind i de rettigheder for Fællesskabet, der følger af dets medlemsskab af FAO.
On 24 September 1993, the Commission again proposed to the Member States that the sharedcompetence formula, with the Community having the right to vote, should be used for the adoption of that draft Agreement.
aftale, der skulle vedtages af FAO-konferencen, at internationale bevarings- og forvaltni ngsfo rans tal minger skulle respekteres af fiskerfartøjer på det åbne hav, og aftalen indeholdt ikke længere de bestemmelser om tildeling af flag, som Rådet støttede sig på, da det fastslog, at aftalens hovedindhold ikke lå inden for Fællesskabets enekompetence.
With regard to the Council's argument that it did not adopt an act within the meaning of Article 173 of the Treaty, it must be borne in mind that an action for annulment must be available in the case of all measures adopted by the institutions, whatever their nature or form, which are intended to have legal effects.
For det andet forbydes det ved denne beslutning Kommissionen at give udtryk for den fælles holdning, således at Kommissionen kun kan tale for at støtte og/eller supplere formandsskabets erklæring.
On 21 October 1993, as no agreement had been reached, Coreper considered that the indication to be sent to the FAO should state 'shared competence — Member State vote'.
Med hensyn til bestemmelserne om vedtagelse af eventuelt strafferetlige sanktioner og om bistand til udviklingslande, som ifølge Rådet henhører under medlemsstaternes kompetence, fremgår det, at disse under alle omstændigheder ikke
First, it recognized the Member States, and not the Community, as having the right to participate in the definitive adoption of the Agreement, the Council's vote affected the Community's rights attaching to its membership of the FAO.
For det tredje har medlemsstaternes stemmeafgivning i overensstemmelse med den fælles holdning over for tredjelande og FAO givet det udseende af, at hovedindholdet af aftalen ikke var omfattet af Fællesskabets enekompetence.
Thirdly, by virtue of the Arrangement, the fact that the Member States voted in accordance with the common position gave other States and the FAO the impression that the thrust of the Agreement did not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community.
Rådets afstemning har derfor fået retsvirkninger for forholdet mellem Fællesskabet og medlemsstaterne, mellem institutionerne og endelig mellem Fællesskabet og dets medlemsstater på den ene side og andre folkeretlige retssubjekter, særligt FAO og FAO's medlemsstater, på den anden side.
The Council's vote therefore had legal effects as regards relations between the Community and the Member States, between the institutions of the Community and, finally, between the Community and its Member States on the one hand and other subjects of international law, especially the FAO and its Member States, on the other.
Den udgør derfor en retsakt i traktatens artikel 173's forstand.
It is thus an act within the meaning of Article 173 of the Treaty.
Afvisningspåstanden kan herefter ikke tages til følge.
The objection of inadmissibility must therefore be dismissed.
Fællesskabet har på det interne plan kompetence til at træffe enhver foranstaltning til bevaring af havets biologiske ressourcer.
The Community has the internal power to take any measure for the conservation of the biological resources of the sea.
Efter fast retspraksis har Fællesskabet kompetence til at påtage sig internationale forpligtelser til bevaring af havets ressourcer.
It is clear from those provisions that Coreper is not an institution of the Communities upon which the Treaty confers powers of its own but an auxiliary body of the Council, for which it carries out preparation and implementation work.
Det følger endvidere af fast retspraksis, at Fællesskabet for så vidt angår det åbne hav på de områder, der henhører under dets kompetence, har samme kompetence til at lovgive, som ifølge folkeretten tilkommer den stat, hvis flag fartøjet fører, eller hvor det er registreret.
It is settled law that the Community has authority to enter into international commitments for the conservation of the resources of the sea.
Det fremgår af sagen, at da Rådet vedtog den anfægtede beslutning, var hovedindholdet af den
It follows that Coreper could not adopt, on 21 October 1993, a decision on the right to vote and that the Council's vote on 22 November 1993 cannot therefore be regarded as confirming a previous Coreper decision.
indtager en fremtrædende plads i udkastet til aftale.
It has also been consistently held that, as regards the high seas, the Community has the same regulatory powers, in areas falling within its authority, as are recognized under international law to the State whose flag the vessel flies or in which it is registered.
Det bemærkes i så henseende, at når en aftale eller en konvention henhører dels under Fællesskabets, dels under medlemsstaternes kompetenceområde, må der etableres et snævert samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne og Fællesskabets institutioner.
It must be remembered that where it is apparent that the subject-matter of an agreement or convention falls partly within the competence of the Community and partly within that of its Member States, it is essential to ensure close cooperation between the Member States and the Community institutions.
For så vidt angår nærværende sag bemærkes, at ved punkt 2.3 i ordningen mellem Rådet og Kommissionen opfyldes denne forpligtelse til samarbejde mellem Fællesskabet og medlemsstaterne i forhold til FAO.
In the present case, section 2.3 of the Arrangement between the Council and the Commission represents fulfilment of that duty of cooperation between the Community and its Member States within the FAO.
Det må herefter fastslås, at Rådet, da det konkluderede, at hovedindholdet af udkastet til aftale vedrørte spørgsmål, der ikke lå inden for Fællesskabets enekompetence, og derfor tildelte medlemsstaterne stemmeretten med henblik på vedtagelsen af dette udkast, overtrådte punkt 2.3 i ordningen, som det var forpligtet til at overholde.
Consequently, by concluding that the draft Agreement concerned an issue whose thrust did not lie in an area within the exclusive competence of the Community and accordingly giving the Member States the right to vote for the adoption of that draft, the Council acted in breach of section 2.3 of the Arrangement which it was required to observe.
Den af Rådet (fisken) trufne beslutning af 22. november 1993, hvorved medlemsstaterne tillægges stemmeret i De Forenede Nationers Levnedsmiddel- og Landbrugsorganisation med henblik på vedtagelse af en aftale til sikring af, at internationale bevarings- ogforvaltningsforanstaltningerrespekteres af fiskerfartøjer på det åbne hav, annulleres.
Annuls the decision of the "Fisheries" Council of 22 November 1993 giving the Member States the right to vote in the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization for the adoption of the Agreement to promote compliance with international conservation and management measures by fishing vessels on the high seas;
Det Forenede Kongerige bærer sine egne omkostninger.*
Orders the United Kingdom to bear its own costs.'
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 26. oktober 1995.
Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 26 October 1996.
»1) Rådet frifindes.
'1 ) dismiss the application;
2) Kommissionen betaler Rådets omkostninger.
2) order the Commission to bear the costs of the Council;
3) Det Forenede Kongerige betaler selv de omkostninger, det har afholdt som intervenient.«
3) order the United Kingdom as intervener to bear its own costs.'
Sag C-297/94 Dominique Bruyère m.fl. / État belge Tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne
Case C-297/94 Dominique Bruyère and Others ν Belgian State Approximation of laws
Præjudiciel »Veterinærlægemidler (Første Afdeling)
Preliminary ruling (Veterinary medicinal (First Chamber)
Ved dom af 12. oktober 1994 indgået til Domstolen den 4. november 1994 har Belgiens Conseil d'État i medfør af EF-traktatens artikel 177 forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 4, stk. 2, i Rådets direktiv 81/851/EØF (herefter »direktiv 81/851«) i den oprindelige affattelse og som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 90/676/EØF (herefter »direktiv 90/676«).
By judgment of 12 October 1994, the Belgian Conseil d'État referred for a preliminary ruling two questions concerning the interpretation of Article 4(2) of Council Directive 81/851/EEC (hereinafter 'Directive 81/851'), in its original version and as amended by Council Directive 90/676/EEC.
ikke indebærer en fuldstændig harmonisering af alle nationale foranstaltninger, således at traktatens artikel 30 og 36 vil kunne finde anvendelse.
however, that those Decrees have to be considered in the light of Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty, Directive 81/851 does not provide for full harmonization of all national measures and thus leaves room for the application of Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty.
Endvidere har sagsøgerne anført, at visse veterinærlægemidler, f.cks. sera, ikke er omfattet af anvendelsesområdet for direktiv 81/851, og at dette direktiv kun vedrører markedsføring af lægemidler, dvs. forhandling gennem medicinalfirmaer, og ikke den indførsel, en apoteker foretager af et lægemiddel, som ikke er registreret i Belgien, på grundlag af en recept udstedt af en belgisk dyrlæge.
They also argue that some veterinary medicinal products, such as serums, do not come within the scope of Directive 81/851 and that the latter covers only the placing of medicinal products on the market, that is to say, their distribution by pharmaceutical companies, and not the import by a dispensing chemist, pursuant to a prescription issued by a Belgian veterinarian, of a medicinal product which has not been registered in Belgium.
Sagsøgerne i hovedsagen har anlagt sager ved Conseil d'État med påstand om annulation af kongelig anordning af 20. december 1989, hvorved princippet om fuldstændigt forbud mod indførsel af ikke-registrerede lægemidler gennemføres, af kongelig anordning af 14. februar 1990, hvorved der gøres en undtagelse fra dette princip med hensyn til seks stoffer, og af kongelig anordning af 16. januar 1992, hvorved antallet af disse stoffer er forhøjet til fjorten.
The applicants in the main proceedings instituted various proceedings before the Conseil d'État in which they sought the annulment of the Royal Decree of 20 December 1989, which lays down the principle of a total prohibition of imports of unregistered medicinal products, the Royal Decree of 14 February 1990, which provides for an exception to this principle for six molecular substances, and the Royal Decree of 16 January 1992, which increased that number to 14.
Conseil d'État har forenet sagerne og besluttet at udsætte disse med henblik på, at Domstolen kan besvare to præjudicielle spørgsmål.
The arguments put forward by the applicants in the main proceedings cannot be accepted.
Spørgsmålene vedrører det samme problem, nemlig om en medlemsstat kan forbyde indførsel af et lægemiddel, som ikke forinden er godkendt til markedsføring af den kompetente myndighed.
After it had joined the various cases, the Conseil d'État stayed the proceedings and submitted two questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Selv om det anføres i direktiv 81/851, at det kun »udgør en etape af virkeliggørelsen af målsætningen vedrørende fri omsætning af veterinærmedicinske præparater« (11. betragtning), kan det imidlertid ikke heraf udledes, at traktatens artikel 30 og 36 vil kunne finde anvendelse ved siden af direktivet med hensyn til de heraf omfattede lægemidler.
Those questions raise only one issue, namely whether it is possible for a Member State to prohibit the import of a medicinal product, the marketing of which has not been the subject of prior authorization by the competent authority.
Sagsøgerne har ikke bestridt, at de kongelige anordninger er i overensstemmelse med artikel 4 i direktiv 81/851, også efter at artiklen blev ændret ved direktiv 90/676.
Although Directive 81/851 describes itself as 'one stage in the achievement of the aim of freedom of movement of veterinary medicinal products' (11th recital in the preamble), it cannot be inferred from this that, for medicinal products coming within its scope, the directive leaves room for the application of Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty.
De har imidlertid gjort gældende, at anordningerne må vurderes på baggrund af EF-traktatens artikel 30 og 36, idet direktiv 81/851 kun udgør en etape af virkeliggørelsen af målsætningen vedrørende fri omsætning af veterinærlægemidler og dermed
That wording means only that the system of multiple national authorizations for the marketing of products, was destined to be replaced by a system under which account was to be taken of authorizations granted by other Member States and subsequently by a system for the mutual recognition in principle of such authorizations.
Med hensyn til artikel 4 i direktiv 81/851 er bestemmelsens rækkevidde klar, idet det fremgår af bestemmelsen, at såvel markedsføring som anvendelse af et lægemiddel på en medlemsstats område forudsætter, at medlemsstatens kompetente myndighed forud har givet tilladelse hertil.
The applicants in the main proceedings do not deny that the Royal Decrees are consistent with Article 4 of Directive 81/851, even after its amendment by Directive 90/676.
anvende et lægemiddel indebærer, at det også er forbudt at indføre det, når indførsel sker med henblik på et af disse formål.
As for the arguments of the applicants in the main proceedings that they are dependent on the pharmaceutical companies' good will and that the prohibition on importing certain medicinal products for which no equivalent exists endangers the health of both animals and humans, the Court simply finds that, in adopting the contested Royal Decrees, the Belgian State was acting within the sphere of competence which Community law recognizes it as having.
Det forhold, at en apoteker i en medlemsstat indfører et lægemiddel, der er ordineret af en dyrlæge i denne stat i et bestemt øjemed, er derfor også omfattet af denne bestemmelse.
It is therefore only in the light of the rules of national law that the public-health policy pursued might fall to be assessed.