natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Min kone og jeg forlader Luxembourg med de bedste minder og med dybtfølt taknemmelighed over for alle, der har gjort vort ophold så behageligt.
My wife and I leave Luxembourg with the fondest memories andwith profound thanksto all who have made our stay here so agreeable.
Jeg kommer fra et common /«tv-land, men fra et, der, da det blev selvstændigt for mere end 70 år siden, vedtog en skreven forfatning med et charter om rettigheder og med retslig prøvelse af lovgivningen.
tr come from a common law country but from one which, on becomingindependent, more than 70 yearsago, adopted a written constitution with a charter of rights and judicial review of legislation.For constitutional lawyers in Ireland,prior to entry to the EEC rn L973,the great foreign source of inspiration was the
For forfatningsjurister i Irland var den store inspirationskilde forud for tiltrædelsen af De Europæiske Fællesskaber i 1973 Amerikas Forenede Staters forfatning.
Constitution of the United States of America.
Som følge deraf var vi vant til at løse vanskelige faktuelle spørgsmål i lyset af vanskelige principielle spørgsmål.
As a result we were used to theeffort to resolve complex questions of fact in the light of complex questions ofprinciple.
Det var ganske vist et chok at blive udsat for et civil law-system, men måske ikke så stort et chok, som det ville have været for en common law-]\inst skolet i traditionen med parlamentarisk suverænitet.
Exposure to the civil law system was still a shock but perhapsnot quiteso great a shock as it would have been to a common lawyer trained in the traditionof parliamentarysovereignty. sovereignty.
Fællesskabssystemet giver udelukkende Retten mulighed for at afsige en samlet dom uden mulighed for dissens.
The Community system permits the Court to deliver one judgment only.
I et ungt Fællesskab er det formodentlig fornuftigt, at den øverste appelinstans skal udtale sig med én røst, da det normalt vil styrke instansens autoritet.
In ayoung Community it is probably right that the final court of appeal should speakwith one voice as this tends to enhanceits authority.
Den amerikanske Federal Supreme Court (Forbundshøjesteret) valgte ud fra forsigtighedshensyn samme system i den amerikanske forfatnings første år. Senere fandt denne domstol dog, at den kunne tillade domme med dissens.
The American Federal Supreme Court adopted the same system, as a matter of prudence,in the earlyyears of the American Constitution.
Overordnet følger Irland common /ßiv-reglen, og hver dommer har ret til at afgive sin bedømmelse med tilslutning til eller dissentierende i forhold til flertallet.
Ireland, in general,follows the common law rule and each judge is permitted togive his own judgment assenting with, or dissenting from, the majority.
Der er dog en meget betydelig forskel fra denne regel.
There ishowever one very significant exception to this rule.
Når vores Supreme Court skal træffe afgørelse om, hvorvidt en lov vedtaget af parlamentet efter 1937 er i overensstemmelse med forfatningen, afsiges en samlet dom, og det er ikke tilladt at tilkendegive eventuelle niinoritetssynspunkter. På grund af nogle komplekse processuelle regler gælder dette ikke for love vedtaget af parlamentet før 1937. Man vil derfor kunne se disse to ordninger fungere parallelt ved samme retsinstans.
When our Supreme Court sitsto rule on the constitutionality of an Act of Parliament passed since L937 the Court pronounces one judgment only and the existence of a minority view maynot be disclosed.For complex procedural reasons the same rule does not applyto Acts of Parliament passed prior to 1937.
Jeg tror, at de fleste jurister vil være enige i, at det sidstnævnte
I think that most scholarswould agree that the second system leads to sharper analysis and a fuller discussion of the issues involved in the case.
Ifølge ét argument er fællesskabsretten udtryk for en udvikling på grundlag af medlemsstaternes fælles traditioner, og af den grund skal dommerne sættes sammen afdelingsvis frem for at fungere individuelt.
of First Instance?There is an argument that Community law is in part anevolution from the common traditions of the Member States and that this requiresthat judges should sit in chambersrather than individually.
Var det ikke muligt, at borgerne ville få et tydeligere billede af denne udviklingsproces, hvis dommerne havde frihed til at afgive individuelle bedømmelser?
Might it not bepossible that the citizen would get a clearerview of the evolutionary process ifjudges were free to give individual opinions?
Indførelsen af en sådan adgang ville medføre en forvanskning af den almindelige funktionsdygtighed af et retsligt system. På den anden side ville det uden nogen ændring af traktaterne kunne lade sig gøre at give Retten i Første Instans ret til — med mulighed for at iværksætte appel ved Domstolen — at behandle og træffe afgørelse i sager anlagt af medlemsstaterne.
To grantsuch a right would be to distort the normal workingsof a judicial system.On theother hand it would be possible, without any amendment to the treaties, to givethe Court of First Instance power to hear and determine, subject to appeal to the Court of Justice, complaints brought by Member States.
Ville dette ikke være en nemmere fremgangsmåde til imødegåelse af den nævnte kritik?
Would this not be asimpler method of meeting the criticism?
Endelig er det allerede nu klart, at der vil ske en stor stigning i Retten i Første Instans' arbejdsmængde i de kommende år, og det er tvivlsomt, om Retten i Første Instans i dens nuværende organisationsform står bedst muligt rustet til at tackle den øgede arbejdsmængde, eller om procesreglementet tillader den den fornødne fleksibilitet for at kunne løfte de nye opgaver.
Finally, it is already clear that there is going to be a huge expansion in the workload of the Court of First Instance in the years aheadand it is doubtful if the Court of First Instance, as presently organised, is in the best position to tacklethis increasedworkload or if its rules of procedure allow it the necessaryflexibility to meet this new challenge.
En forøgelse af antallet af medlemmer af Retten i Første Instans ville ikke rejse samme forfatningsmæssige vanskeligheder som en forøgelse af antallet af medlemmer af Domstolen.
Increasing the membership of the Court of First Instance would not presentthe same constitutional difficulties as increasingthe membership of the Court of Justicewould.
Med tiden vil man kunne granske denne mulighed, men vi må først stille os det spørgsmål, om vi kan blive mere effektive gennem en bedre tilrettelæggelse af vore arbejdsmetoder.
That solution may have to belooked at, in time, but first we should enquire as to whether we can makeourselves more efficientby better organisation of our work practices.But here wecome up against another problem.
Her støder vi imidlertid på endnu et problem.
Community institutions have only the powerswhich the Member States have agreed to confer upon them.
Fællesskabsinstitutionerne besidder kun de beføjelser, medlemsstaterne er blevet enige om at overlade dem.
Courts in particularmust act only within the jurisdiction which they have been granted.
Navnlig må retsinstanserne kun handle inden for rammerne af den kompetence, de er blevet tillagt.
It is right alsothat they should act only within rules of procedure approved by the Council of Ministers.
Det er også korrekt, at retsinstanserne udelukkende kan handle på grundlag af det af Ministerrådet godkendte procesreglement.
That said, however, one might ask if our statute and our rules ofprocedure should not allow us more flexibility in the way we tackle our work.
personalesager skal behandles af tremands-afdelinger?
Address by B. Friedmann, President of the Courtof Auditors p. I07
Tale holdt af Revisionsrettens formand, B. Friedmann
We have just heard the Court of Justice, in the person of its President, expresscertain sentiments which are greatly appreciatedby the Court of Auditors.
Tale holdt af Domstolens præsident, Gil Carlos Rodríguez Iglesias
the pursuit of economic and financial policy.
Hr. formand, ærede præsident, Deres excellencer, mine damer og herrer.
It follows that attention is becomingincreasingly focused on the economic effects and the redistributivefunction of the
Vi er samlet i dag i anledning af edsaflæggelsen fra de nye medlemmer af Den Europæiske Revisionsret.
Community budget; and it is clear that, in such a scheme, the Court of Auditorshas a role to play.
På et tidspunkt med økonomiske vanskeligheder er det ligeledes passende at foretage en kraftanstrengelse for så vidt angår anvendelsen af de offentlige midler.
It is an important role in severalrespects. respects.
Revisionsretten spiller selvsagt en fremtrædende rolle i den forbindelse, eftersom det tilkommer den at sikre en detaljeret kontrol med alle Fællesskabets indtægter og udgifter.
First, by keepingthe public informed of the use to which Community funds areput, and by assessing that use in the light of the criteria which it is required bythe Treaties to apply, the Court of Auditors provides the people of Europe withone of several points of reference whereby the confidence placed in the Community may be gauged.
I dette øjemed er Revisionsretten i traktaterne blevet tillagt de specifikke beføjelser, der er nødvendige for i fuldt omfang at kunne varetage denne opgave.
Next, it will be noted that, over the course of time, the scope of the Community'sfinances has grown considerablyin response to the diversification and expansionof the functions of the Community.
Vigtigheden af Revisionsrettens arbejde viser sig endvidere i den interesse, der knytter sig til Revisionsrettens bemærkninger såvel i mere specialiserede kredse som i offentligheden i hele Fællesskabet.
It follows that the performanceby theCourtin the best possible manner of the tasks conferred on it by the Treaties will enablethe Community to avoid the pitfall of excessive regulation,which means,in thefinal analysis,that the Court of Auditors constitutes one of the guarantors of therights of the individual.
Men beføjelser er i sig selv ingenting uden de mænd — og kvinder — der udøver dem.
From time immemorial, the budget has constituted a political instrument offundamental importance.
Disse kvalifikationer har De erhvervet enten i Deres oprindelseslands nationale »rigsrevision« eller på grundlag af imponerende karrierer i den private og
In the same way, the role of the citizens'representatives in any democratic system involves inter alianot only the creationof the means by which action can be taken to ensure the functioning of the publicservice but also the regular monitoring of the way in which those means areemployed.
Til brug for udøvelsen af Deres funktioner tillægger traktaten Dem direkte rettigheder, der har til formål at gøre det muligt for Dem at udøve Deres hverv i fuld uafhængighed i Fællesskabets almindelige interesse.
The main task of an independent Court of Auditors is, specifically, to makeinformation of value rapidly available in summary form to the authorityresponsible for reviewing policy.
Traktaten pålægger Dem desuden pligter såvel i Deres tjenesteperiode som efter, at denne er afsluttet.
The way in which the Court fulfils that taskmakes it an essential component in the machinery of democracy.
Traktaten stiller krav om, at De skal afgive en højtidelig forsikring om at overholde disse pligter. Dette er formålet med den edsaflæggelse, som jeg skal bede Dem foretage over for Domstolen om et øjeblik.
For my part,I am convinced that, together with our new colleagues, we will continue to workeffectively in the interests of the Union and that we will take care not todisappoint the expectations of the people of Europe.
Tale holdt af formanden for Revisionsretten, B. Friedmann
Formal sitting of the Court of Justice on 12 June 1996
Hr. præsident for Domstolen, ærede medlemmer af Domstolen, Deres excellencer, mine damer og herrer, kære kolleger.
Address by G.C. Rodrfguez lglesias, President of the Court of Justice, inmemory of Judge Fernand Schockweiler
Jeg vil også gerne udtrykke min tak for de lykønskninger, Domstolen så venligt rettede til mig, da jeg blev valgt til formand for Revisionsretten.
It is with great sadness that we today pay tribute to the memory of our colleagueand friend FernandSchockweiler.
Jeg er overbevist om, at de udmærkede forbindelser, der består mellem vore to institutioner, ikke vil ændres i fremtiden, og den frugtbare udveksling af synspunkter, vi havde for ganske nylig, er et godt bevis herpå.
Our sadness is magnified by the fact that hisuntimely deathcut short, with brutal suddenness, a friendship and a collaborationthe fruits of which we all thought we would continue to enjoy for many years tocome.
Revisionsretten har netop taget imod fire nye medlemmer, og jeg er glad for endnu en gang at kunne fremsætte mine lykønskninger til dem på vegne af Revisionsrettens kollegium.
Fernand Schockweiler died suddenlyon 1 June last, a few days after his 61stbirthday. He leavesthe Court bereft of one of its most experienced and mostesteemed Members.
På demie retsdag til ære for vor institution bør vi særligt mindes Daniel Strasser, vort franske medlem, som gik bort den 16. december 1995.
Fernand Schockweiler's childhood was cruelly marked by the war; at the age ofonly seven,he sufferedthe experience of deportation.
Han var en stor europæer, og hans virke på området for Fællesskabets offentlige finanser har givet genlyd langt uden for de europæiske institutioners kreds.
There can be no doubt that thatpainful experience played a decisive role in his attachmentto the rule of law,to justice and to the construction of Europe.
Daniel Strasser's indsats for vort kollegiums arbejde var betydningsfuldt, og hans ofte afgørende indlæg var udtryk for hans engagement til forsvar for Fællesskabets finansielle og budgetmæssige interesser.
If one had to sum up Fernand Schockweiler's professional life in a few words,one might describe it as a life wholly devoted to the public service, and inparticular to the service of justice, in which he alwaysexcelled. excelled.
I en mindre tragisk sammenhæng vil jeg ligedes udtrykke Revisionsrettens taknemmelighed over for min forgænger, André Middelhoek, og de to afgående medlemmer, Androutsopoulos og Thoss, for deres omfattende bidrag til Revisionsretten udvikling. På vegne af vort kollegium ønsker jeg Dem hver for sig held og lykke i fremtiden.
After achieving brilliant results in his studies in Luxembourg and at the Facultöde Droit in Paris, culminatingin his being awardedthe degree of Doctor of Laws,he entered the service of the Luxembourg Ministry of Justice in 1961, risingrapidly through its ranks to become Government Adviser in 1974 andsubsequently Chief Government Adviser in t982.
En lejlighed som demie, hvor vi samles i disse lokaler, giver anledning til at tænke over, hvilken rolle de europæiske borgere anser Revisionsretten for at have.
His work at the Ministry of Justice comprised a significant foreign dimension.He representedLuxembourg on numerous internationalbodies, including, in particular, various committees of the Council of Europe.
En konstatering presser sig på: For den europæiske borger er Europa ofte synonymt med fællesmarkedet.
In October 1985 Fernand Schockweiler was appointed Judge at the Court of Justice.
En følge heraf er, at der rettes stigende opmærksomhed mod de økonomiske konsekvenser og virkningerne af omfordelingerne i kraft af fællesskabsbudgettet, og det er indlysende, at Revisionsretten har en rolle at spille i den sammenhæng.
Over a period of more than ten and a half years in that office, hisoutstanding abilities, allied to the rigour of his approachto his duties, were towork wonders and assure him a central place in the development of ourinstitution.
For det første derved, at Revisionsretten ved at informere borgerne om, hvorledes fællesskabsmidlerne er blevet anvendt, og ved at vurdere anvendelsen i lyset af de kriterier, som er fastsat derom i traktaterne, leverer et referenceelement — blandt mange — der gør det muligt at måle den tillid, Fællesskabet nyder godt af.
I can however tell you that, when I arrived at theCourtin January 1986, the abundance of his notesfor the deliberations and the respectwith which he was heard in them gave me the impressionthat I was dealing withsomeone who had already been in the institution for many years, even though hehad arrived only three months before me.
Dernæst må det konstateres, at med tiden er anvendelsesområdet for Fællesskabets finanser vokset betydeligt som svar på den stigende spredning og væksten i Fællesskabets opgaver.
Day after day, he devoted himself heart and soul to his work, commanding therespect of his peersby the soundnessof his proposalsandthe speedwith whichhe produced them, Unfailing in his respect for the principle of collegiality whichcharacterises our work, he was rigorouslyfaithful to the line taken by the Court,even where it diverged appreciably from his own approach.
Hvis Revisionsretten udfører de opgaver, den er pålagt efter traktaterne, vil det være muligt at komme uden om dette klippeskær af overdrevne forskrifter, og derfor er Revisionsretten i sidste ende en af garanterne for individets rettigheder.
A lover of truth, hewas always completely objective in his presentation of cases.
Et budget har altid var været et centralt politisk instrument, på samme måde som det i et ethvert demokratisk system navnlig er op til de valgte repræsentanter for borgerne at skabe de instrumenter, som kan sikre det offentliges funktionsdygtighed, men desuden er op til dem at foretage en forskriftsmæssig kontrol af anvendelsen deraf.
Through his work, Fernand Schockweiler thus demonstrated his unfailingdedication to the principal task of the Court. His first and foremost concern wasthat the Court's judgments should be of a high quality and delivered withoutundue delay.
Men for at kunne udføre denne demokratiske kontrol fuldt ud skal de parlamentariske forsamlinger, som den udøvende magt aflægger regnskab til, råde over de nødvendige oplysninger for at kunne danne sig en objektiv og begrundet mening.
He was also keenly attentive to the smooth running of theinstitution's administrative machinery. He was,finally, always available to assistthe Court during judicial vacations.
Det er netop hovedopgaven for en revisionsret på hurtig og sammenfattende vis at give den myndighed, der skal foretage den politiske kontrol, et ordentligt informationsgrundlag.
He nevertheless found the time to speak at major conferences and to publishnumerous treatises on the law, particularly in the sphereof administrative law andprivate international law, his main fields of specialisation.
Og det er måden, hvorpå Revisionsretten kan afvikle den opgave, der gør den til et afgørende element for demokratiets funktionsdygtighed.
Fernand Schockweiler maintained his exceptional devotion to the service of the Court to the very end.
Jeg er overbevist om, at vi sammen med vore nye kolleger fortsat vil arbejde effektivt i Unionens interesse, og vi vil anstrenge os for ikke at skuffe de europæiske borgeres forventninger.
On24 May last, in a precarious state of health followingthe surgery which he had just undergone, he once again participated in thedeliberations of the Court. The last draft judgment distributedby him is dated28 May.
Hr. præsident, jeg takker Domstolen for at have givet mig ordet under dette retsmøde.
Once again, I extend to his family our sympathy and our condolences,and askyou to join me in a minute's silenceas we rememberhim. him.
Mindetale holdt af Domstolens præsident, Gil Carlos Rodríguez Iglesias, for Fernand Schockweiler
Address by A. Saggio, President of the Court
I oktober 1985 blev Fernand Schockweiler udnævnt til dommer ved Domstolen.
Address by G.C. Rodrfguez lglesias, President of the Court of Justice
Her udvirkede hans brillante evner gennem mere end 10 1/2 år, forbundet med en hård arbejdsindsats, store ting og sikrede ham en central plads i udviklingen af vor institution.
Your Excellencies,Ladies and Gentlemen.
Men jeg kan dog berette, at da jeg ankom til Domstolen i januar 1986, gav mængden af noter fra hans hånd under voteringerne og den respekt, hvormed man lyttede til ham, mig indtryk af, at jeg befandt mig over for en person, der havde været ved institutionen længe, mens han faktisk var kommet blot tre måneder før mig.
While we are here today to witnessthe taking of the oath by the new Membersof the Court of Justice and of the Court of First Instance, I should like to take thisopportunity to recall to mind the cruelly sudden departureof our colleague andfriend Fernand Schockweiler, whom we rememberwith an aching sense of loss.
Med sin forkærlighed for sandheden skitserede han altid omstændighederne med absolut objektivitet.
Please allow me, Mr Schintgen, to welcome you most warmly to the Court of Justice.
Gennem sit arbejde gav Fernand Schockweiler løbende beviser på sit engagement i Domstolens primære mission. Han var først og fremmest beskæftiget med kvaliteten og korrektheden af den retspraksis, der produceredes.
I hardly need recall here that, as a Judge at the Court of First Instance, you wereamongst those who assistedat its christening in 1989 and that, since then, youhave performed your duties there with every success.
Endelig var han altid til rådighed for henvendelser under retsferierne.
Your previous professional experience had preparedyou admirably for a careeron the bench.
Han fandt endog tid til at afgive indlæg på betydningsfulde konferencer og til at offentliggøre mange juridiske værker, navnlig om den administrative sagsbehandling og international privatret, der var hans primære specialiseringsområder.
After achieving brilliant results in your studies in Luxembourg and France,culminating in your being awardedthe degree of Doctor of Laws in 1964, youinitially practised as an avocat, and subsequently as an avocat-avouö,at the
Fernand Schockweiler var en stor jurist og en ihærdig arbejder, men tillige en fantastisk ven.
You very soon joined the Luxembourg civil service, working in the Ministry of Employment and Social Security.
Jeg havde navnlig lejlighed til at beundre hans menneskelige kvaliteter i forbindelse med vor kollega, René Joliet's dødelige sygdom, hvor Schockweiler ydede Joliet al sin støtte og viste stor venskabelig hengivenhed.
Rising through all the ranks, you wereappointed Chief Government Adviser in 1984 and, finally, Administrator General in 1987.
Hans faglige kvalifikationer vil være et stort tab for os, og vi vil med stor smerte mindes den varme, der kendetegnede de menneskelige relationer, han opbyggede.
In particular, you have performed important functions in a number of Communityinstitutions and organisations.
Idet jeg kondolerer og endnu en gang ønsker at forsikre familien om vor medfølelse, vil jeg anmode de tilstedeværende om at iagttage et minuts stilhed til hans minde.
A specialist in social and labour law, you put yourknowledge of those fields into practice in the Council's Working Party on Social
Højtideligt retsmøde i Domstolen den 11. juli 1996 i anledning af Romain Schintgen's tiltræden som dommer ved Domstolen og Marc Jaeger's tiltræden som dommer ved Retten i Første Instans
Those numerous activities have not preventedyou from building up a reputation- based not leaston your published works - as an expertin the field of labourlaw, which you have explored in all its aspects,from the standpointof both Luxembourg law and European law.
Tale holdt af Domstolens præsident, Gil Carlos Rodríguez Iglesias
Very active in the academicworld, you took up this year the office of Presidentof the International University Institute, Luxembourg.
Tale holdt af præsidenten for Retten i Første Instans, Antonio Saggio
It is first and foremostthe President of the Court of First Instance who has theprivilege of welcomingyou in your new functions
Tale holdt af Domstolens præsident, Gil Carlos Rodríguez Iglesias
It is true thatexcessively frequent changes in its membership may be prejudicial to the effectiveness with which it operates.
Deres excellencer, mine damer og herrer.
Romain Schintgen is leaving us today to take up the high office of Judge at the Court of Justice.