natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ved vurderingen af, om denne kompetence er eksklusiv, bemærkede Domstolen, at bestemmelserne i konvention nr. 170 ikke har en sådan karakter, at de kan påvirke forskrifter, der er vedtaget i henhold til artikel 118 A.
In order to determine whether that competence was exclusive it was relevant to note that the provisions of Convention No 170 were not of such a kind as to affect rules adopted pursuant to Article 118a.
Eventuelle vanskeligheder i Fællesskabets lovgivningsarbejde kan ikke begrunde, at Fællesskabets kompetence er eksklusiv.
However, any difficulties which might arise for the legislative function of the Community could not constitute the basis for exclusive Community competence.
Af samme grunde kan en eksklusiv kompetence heller ikke begrundes i de fællesskabsbestemmelser, der er vedtaget i henhold til Traktatens artikel 100, herunder bl.a. Rådets direktiv 80/1107/EØF af 27. november 1980 om beskyttelse af arbejdstagere mod farerne ved at være udsat for kemiske, fysiske og biologiske agenser under arbejdet og de særdirektiver, der er vedtaget i henhold til dette direktivs artikel 8, og som alle indeholder mi nimumsforskri fter.
For the same reasons, exclusive competence could not be founded on the Community provisions adopted on the basis of Article 100 of the Treaty, such as, in particular, Council Directive 80/1107/EEC of 27 November 1980 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work and individual directives adopted pursuant to Article 8 of Directive 80/1107, all of which laid down minimum requirements.
Visse direktiver, der er udstedt inden for de områder, som er omhandlet i kapitel III i konvention nr. 170, indeholder imidlertid bestemmelser, der ikke har karakter af minimumsforskrifter.
A number of directives adopted in the areas covered by Part III of Convention No 170 did, however, contain rules, which were more than minimum requirements.
Dette gælder således direktiverne om klassificering, emballering og etikettering af farlige stoffer.
This was the case, for instance, with regard to those on the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances.
Disse direktiver indeholder bestemmelser, som i visse henseender udgør for­anstaltninger, der skal sikre arbejdstagerne en mere vidtgående beskyttelse med hensyn til arbejdsvilkår end bestemmelserne i kapitel III i konvention nr. 170.
Those directives contained provisions which in certain respects constituted measures conferring on workers, in their conditions of work, more extensive protection than that accorded under the provisions contained in Part III of Convention No 170.
Konvention nr. 170 har dog et videre anvendelsesområde end de nævnte direk­tiver.
The scope of Convention No 170, however, was wider than that of the directives mentioned.
Definitionen af begrebet "kemikalie" er således mere omfattende end definitionen af de produkter, der er omhandlet i direktiverne.
The definition of chemicals, for instance, was broader than that of the products covered by the directives.
Endvidere indeholder konventionen i modsætning til direktiverne bestemmelser om transport af kemikalier.
In addition (and in contrast to the provisions contained in the directives), the Convention regulated the transport of chemicals.
Selv om der ikke er nogen modsætning mellem konventionens og de nævnte direktivers bestemmelser, måtte Domstolen imidlertid konstatere, at kapitel III i konvention nr. 170 omhandler et område, der allerede i vid udstrækning er reguleret i fællesskabsbestemmelser.
While there was no contradiction between these provisions of the Convention and those of the directives mentioned, it must nevertheless be accepted that Part III of Convention No 170 was concerned with an area which was already covered to a large extent by Community rules.
Domstolen fastslog herefter, at de forpligtelser, der følger af kapitel III i konvention nr. 170, og som er omfattet af området for de nævnte direktiv­er, kan påvirke de fællesskabsbestemmelser, der er fastsat i disse direk­tiver. Medlemsstaterne kan derfor ikke uden om de fælles institutioner påtage sig disse forpligtelser.
In those circumstances, it must be considered that the commitments arising from Part III of Convention No 170, falling within the area covered by the directives mentioned above, were of such a kind as to affect the Community rules laid down in those directives and that consequently Member States could not undertake such commitments outside the framework of the Community institutions.
I det omfang, de materielle bestemmelser i konvention nr. 170 henhører under Fællesskabets kompetenceområde, er Fællesskabet også kompetent til at indgå forpligtelser med henblik på gennemførelse af disse bestemmelser.
In so far as it had been established that the substantive provisions of Convention No 170 came within the Community sphere of competence, the Community was also competent to undertake commitments for putting those provisions into effect.
I henhold til artikel 3 skal de mest repræsentative arbejdsgiver­ og arbejdstagerorganisationer konsulteres vedrørende de foranstaltninger, der skal træffes med henblik på at gennemføre bestemmelserne i konvention nr. 170.
Article 3 required that the most representative organizations of employers and workers should be consulted on the measures to be taken to give effect to the provisions of Convention No 170.
På fællesskabsrettens nuværende udviklingstrin henhører socialpolitikken, herunder forhandlingerne mellem arbejdsmarkedets parter, ganske vist i overvejende grad under medlemsstaternes kompetence.
As Community law stood, social policy and in particular cooperation between both sides of industry, were matters which fell predominantly within the competence of the Member States.
Dette område er imidlertid ikke fuldstændigt unddraget Fællesskabets kompe­tence.
This matter had not, however, been withdrawn entirely from the competence of the Community.
Kommissionen skal således i henhold til Traktatens artikel 118 Β
According to Article 118b of the Treaty, the Commission was
- 10 - bestræbe sig på at udvikle dialogen mellem arbejdsmarkedets parter på europæisk plan.
10 - required to endeavour to develop the dialogue between management and labour at European level.
Spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt internationale forpligtelser vedrørende høring af repræsentative arbejdsgiver- og arbejdstagerorganisationer henhører under medlemsstaternes eller Fællesskabets kompetence, kan således ikke adskilles fra genstanden for denne høring.
Consequently, the question whether international commitments, whose purpose was consultation with representative organizations of employers and workers, fell within the competence of the Member States or of the Community could not be separated from the objective pursued by such consultation.
Ifølge artikel 5 i konvention nr. 170 skal den kompetente myndighed have bemyndigelse til, såfremt det er berettiget af sikkerheds- og sundhedsmæssige årsager, at forbyde eller begrænse anvendelsen af visse farlige kemikalier eller kræve forudgående indberetning om og tilladelse, før sådanne kemikalier anvendes.
Article 5 of Convention No 170 required that the competent authority was to have the power, if justified on safety and health grounds, to prohibit or restrict the use of certain hazardous chemicals, or to require advance notification and authorization before such chemicals were used.
Domstolen bemærkede i denne forbindelse, at selv om den kompetente myndighed, som er omhandlet i denne artikel, er en myndighed i en af medlemsstaterne, kan Fællesskabet alligevel udadtil påtage sig den forpligtelse, der følger af artiklen.
Even if the competent authority referred to in that article was an authority of one of the Member States, the Community might nevertheless assume the aforementioned obligation for external purposes.
Ligesom Fællesskabet på et område, som er reguleret i fællesskabsbestemmelser, internt kan fastsætte regler, hvorved nationale myndigheder tillægges visse kontrolbeføjelser, kan det udadtil påtage sig forpligtelser, der skal sikre overholdelsen af materielle bestemmelser, som henhører under dets kompetence, og som indebærer, at der tillægges de nationale myndigheder visse kontrolbeføjelser.
Just as, for internal purposes, the Community might provide, in an area covered by Community rules, that national authorities were to be given certain supervisory powers, it might also, for external purposes, undertake commitments designed to ensure compliance with substantive provisions which fell within its competence and imply the attribution of certain supervisory powers to national authorities.
I afgørelse 1/78 af 14. november 1978 understregede Domstolen, at når emnet for en aftale eller en konvention henhører dels under Fællesskabets, dels under medlemsstaternes kompetence, må der såvel under forhandlings- og tiltrædelsesfasen som i forbindelse med opfyldelsen af de påtagne for pligtelser etableres et snævert samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne og Fællesskabets institutioner.
In Ruling 1/78 of 14 November 1978, the Court pointed out that when it appeared that the subject-matter of an agreement or contract fell in part within the competence of the Community and in part within that of the Member States, it was important to ensure that there was a close association between the institutions of the Community and the Member States both in the process of negotiation and conclusion and in the fulfilment of the obligations entered into.
Denne forpligtelse til samarbejde i relation til Euratom-Traktaten gælder ligeledes i henhold til EØF-Traktaten, idet den følger af kravet om enhed i Fællesskabets optræden udadtil.
This duty of cooperation, to which attention was drawn in the context of the EAEC Treaty, must also apply in the context of the EEC Treaty since it resulted from the requirement of unity in the international representation of the Community.
Domstolen udtalte, at i denne sag er et samarbejde mellem Fællesskabet og medlemsstaterne så meget desto mere påkrævet, som Fællesskabet på folkerettens nuværende udviklingstrin ikke selv kan tiltræde en ILO-konvention, men dette må ske gennem medlemsstaterne.
In this case, cooperation between the Community and the Member States was all the more necessary in view of the fact that the former could not, as international law stood at present, itself conclude an ILO convention and must do so through the medium of the Member States.
Domstolen fastslog herefter, at det påhviler Fællesskabets institutioner og medlemsstaterne at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger med henblik på bedst muligt at sikre et sådant samarbejde, såvel ved forelæggelsen for den kompetente myndighed og ratifikationen af konvention nr. 170 som ved opfyldelsen af forpligtelserne i henhold hertil.
It was therefore for the Community institutions and the Member States to take all the measures necessary so as best to ensure such cooperation both in the procedure of submission to the competent authority and ratification of Convention No 170 and in the implementation of commitments resulting from that Convention.
"Kompetencen til at tiltræde ILO-konvention nr. 170 tilkommer medlemsstaterne og Fællesskabet i forening."
"The conclusion of ILO Convention No 170 is a natter which falls within the joint competence of the Member States and the Community.11
Appel af dom afsagt den 12. juli 1990 af Retten i Første Instans i sag T-35/89, A. Albani m.fl. mod Kommissionen
Case C-242/90-P Commission ν Albani (Appeal against the judgment of 12 July 1990 of the Court of First Instance in Case T-35/89, Albani and Others ν Commission)
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 23. marts 1993.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on 23 March 1993.
Han foreslog følgende afgørelse:
He proposed that the Court should decide as follows:
Den af Retten i Første Instans den 12. juli 1990 afsagte dom i sag T-35/89, Albani m.fl. mod Kommissionen, ophæves, idet dommen annullerer Kommissionens handlinger i forbindelse med udvælgelsesprøve KOM/A/482, uden at det undersøges, om annullationen henset til de øvrige ansøgeres interesser var strengt nødvendig for behørigt at genindsætte de forbigåede ansøgere i deres rettigheder, og ikke klart angiver, hvilke af Kommissionens handlinger i for bindelse med udvælgelsesprøve KOM/A/482 der annulleres.
The judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 July 1990 in Case T-35/89, Albani ν Commission, should be set aside on the grounds that that judgment: annuls the measures taken by the Commission in connection with Competition C0M/A/482 without considering whether, having regard to the other candidates' interests, that annulment is strictly necessary fairly to restore the right of the other candidates who were adversely affected; does not clearly indicate which measures taken by the Commission in connection with Competition COM/A/482 are annulled;
Sagen hjemvises til Retten."
The case should be referred back to the Court of First Instance."
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 24. marts 1993.
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion on 24 March 1993.
"Nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter en afgiftspligtigtig skal indbetale et acontobeløb vedrørende merværdiafgift, der væsentligt kan overstige den afgift, han faktisk er skyldig på tidspunktet for betaling af acontobeløbet, er uforenelige med bestemmelserne i sjette momsdirektiv (Rådets direktiv 77/388/EØF).
"Provisions of national law requiring a trader to make an interim payment of value added tax which is likely to exceed substantially his actual tax liability at the time when the interim payment is made are incompatible with the provisions of the Sixth Directive on value added tax (Council Directive 77/388/EEC).
Afgiftspligtige, der afkræves sådanne beløb, kan påberåbe sig de relevante bestemmelser i direktivet for den nationale ret.
Traders who are required to make such interim payments may invoke the relevant provisions of the Sixth Directive in proceedings before national courts."
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 24. marts 1993.
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion on 24 March 1993.
"at afvise det af partiet Liberal Democrats anlagte passivitetssøgsmål og følgelig at pålægge det at betale sagens omkostninger."
"Declare inadmissible the action for failure to act brought by the Liberal Democrats and declare that that party should accordingly be ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings."
Generaladvokat Carl Otto Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 24. marts 1993.
Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion on 24 March 1993.
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse:
He proposed that the Court should decide as follows:
"Undtagelsen fra etableringsfriheden i EØF-Traktatens artikel 55 finder ikke anvendelse på hvervet som godkendt bestyrelsesmedlem i henhold til artikel 38, 39 og 40 i den belgiske lov af 9. juli 1975 om tilsyn med forsikringsvirksomheder."
"The derogation from the principle of freedom of establishment provided for in Article 55 of the EEC Treaty does not apply to the office of approved Commissioner as provided for in Articles 38 to 40 of the Belgian Law of 9 July 1975 on the regulation of insurance undertakings."
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 23. december 1992 om en procedure i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 85 - aftaler om levering i fællesskab af tv-spredning via satellit
Case T-24/93 Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports (CMBT) ν Commission (Annulment of the decision of the Commission of 23 December 1992 concerning a procedure for the application of Article 85 of the EEC Treaty and a procedure for the application of Article 86 of the EEC Treaty - Agreements and concerted practices and abuse of a dominant position in the field of maritime transport between northern Europe and western Africa - Annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants)
Sag T-25/93: Dafra-Lines mod Kommissionen
Case T-25/93 Dafra-Lines ν Commission See Case T-24/93
Se sag T-24/93
Case Τ-27/93 Loïc Lal lemand-Zei1er v Commission (Staff case)
Udgivet af Informationstjenesten ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol L-2925 Luxembourg
Published by the Information Service of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, L-2925 Luxembourg.
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS ' Ugen 29. marts - 2. april 1993 Nr. 11/93
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND COUgT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
INDHOLD side
29 March to 2 April 1993
Sag C-24/92 Pierre Corbiau mod Administration des contributions Fri bevægelighed for personer Sag C-168/91 Christos Konstantinidis mod Stadt Altensteig m.fl.
Case C-24/92 4 Pierre Corbiau ν Administration des Contributions Free movement of persons Case C-168/91 5 Christos Konstandinidis ν Stadt Altensteig and Others Free movement of persons Case C-282/91 .7 Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank ν Α.
Fri bevægelighed for personer Sag C-282/91 Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank mod A. de Wit Fri bevægelighed for personer
De Wit Free movement of persons Case C-328/91 9 Secretary of State for Social Security ν E. Thomas and Others Social policy Case C-19/92 11 Dieter Kraus ν Land Baden-Württemberg Free movement of persons Case C-27/92 14 Möllmann-Fleisch ν HZA Hamburg-Jonas Agriculture Joined Cases C-89/85, C-104/85, C-114/95, C-116/85, C117/85 and C-125/85 to C-129/85 15
27 Findling Wälzlager mbH mod Hauptzollamt Karlsruhe Handelspolitik Sag C­250/91 28 Hewlett Packard France mod Directeur général des Douanes Frie varebevægelser Sag C­256/91 ,,, 32 Emsland­Stärke GmbH mod Oberfinanzdirektion Mönchen Frie varebevægelser Forenede sager C­260/91 og C­261/91 33 Diversinte SA m.fl. mod Administración Principal de Aduanas e Impuestos Especiales de la Junquera Landbrug
33 dello Stato Agriculture Case C-25/91 Pesqueras Echebastar ν Commission Agriculture Case C-136/91 Findling Wältzlager ν HZA Karlsruhe Commercial Policy Case C-250/91 Hewlett Packard ν Directeur General des Douanes Free movement of goods Case C-256/91 Emsland-Stärke ν Oberfinanzdirektion München Free movement of goods Joined Cases C-260/91 and C-261/91 Diversinte and Others v Administración Principal de Aduanas de la Junquera Agriculture
B. Retten
Court of First Instance
Bedrijfsvereniging Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat Marco Darmon
Case C-198/91 W. Cook v Commission Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tesauro Case C-337/91 A.M. Van Germer-Derks v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Industriële Bedrijfsvereniging Opinion of Mr Advocate General Darmon Case C-338/91
B. Retten
Court of Justice Court of First Instance
Ved beslutning af 28. januar 1992 indgået til Domstolen samme dag havde Storhertugdømmet Luxembourgs directeur des contributions (direktøren for Skattevæsenet) forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende Traktatens artikel 48.
By decision of 28 January 1992, which was received at the Court Registry on the same date, the Directeur des Contributions (Director of Taxation) of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg referred a question for a preliminary ruling on Article 48 of the Treaty.
Spørgsmålet var blevet rejst under en procedure uden for den egentlige retspleje angående en anmodning om tilbagebetaling af for meget opkrævet indkomstskat, som P. Corbiau havde indgivet til directeur des contributions.
The question arose in the context of proceedings for discretionary settlement of claims brought before the Directeur des Contributions by Mr Corbiau seeking to obtain repayment of an overdeduction of income tax.
Før Domstolen besvarede det præjudicielle spørgsmål, måtte der tages stilling til, om directeur des contributions er en ret i henhold til Traktatens artikel 177, og dermed om spørgsmålet kunne antages til realitetsbehandling. ling.
Before replying to the question referred for a preliminary ruling, the Court wondered whether the Directeur des Contributions constituted a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 177 of the Treaty and, therefore, whether the question was admissible.
Domstolen henviste i denne forbindelse til, at begrebet 'ret' har fælles skabsretlig karakter, og der kan efter dets indhold derved kun forstås en myndighed, der er udenforstående i forhold til den myndighed, som har truffet den afgørelse, der er genstand for sagsanlægget.
The Court noted in that respect that the concept of court or tribunal has a Community character and that it can only essentially designate an authority which is in a third party relationship to that which took the decision against which an action has been brought.
I den foreliggende sag havde directeur des contributions directes et des accises ikke denne egenskab.
In the present case, the Directeur des Contributions Directes et des Accises (Director of Direct taxes and Excise Duties) cannot be thus described.
Som chef for denne myndighed havde han en åbenbar organisatorisk forbindelse med den tjenestegren, der havde foretaget den anfægtede skatteansættelse, som den til ham indgivne klage var rettet mod.
He is at the head of that administration and presents an obvious organisational link between the departments which had calculated the disputed taxation and against which the complaint brought before him was directed.
Dette blev i øvrigt underbygget af, at nævnte directeur i tilfælde af en sag ved Conseil d'État ville være part i sagen.
This view is confirmed, furthermore, by the fact that, upon appeal to the Conseil d'Etat, the said Directeur is a party to the action.
Directeur des contributions kunne herefter ikke anses for en ret i henhold til Traktatens artikel 177, og spørgsmålet blev derfor afvist.
It followed that the Directeur des Contributions is not a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 177 and that his question should be declared to be inadmissible.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The Court ruled as follows: des Contributions of the Grand
"Det af Storhertugdømmet Luxembourgs directeur des contributions forelagte spørgsmål afvises."
"The question referred Duchy of Luxembourg is by the Directeur inadmissible."
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse: i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 16. februar 1993.
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 16 February 1993.
Han foreslog følgende afgørelse:
He proposed that the Court should rule as follws:
Principalt, at det fastslås, at Domstolen ikke har kompetence til at besvare det spørgsmål, der er forelagt af Storhertugdømmet Luxem­bourgs directeur des contributions.
"The Court lacks jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by the Directeur des Contributions of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg;
Subsidiært, at spørgsmålet besvares således, at Traktatens artikel 48, stk. 2, ikke er til hinder for, at bopælsstaten ved fastsættelse af satsen for indkomstbeskatning af en skatteyder, tager hensyn til vedkommendes samlede indkomst i det pågældende år, herunder den indkomst, skatteyderen som ikke­hjemmehørende har oppebåret i samme stat, såfremt vedkommende opnår de samme fordele og fradrag som statens egne borgere."
In the alternative, as the Court has held, Article 48(2) of the Treaty does not preclude taking into account the whole of his income during the tax year, including income received in that State as a non-resident, for the purposes of determining, on the part of the State in which the taxpayer resides, a tax rate applicable to a taxpayer's income, on condition that the person concerned benefit from the same advantages and deductions as that granted to nationals".
Ved kendelse af 27. juni 1991, indgået til Domstolen den 1. juli 1991, havde Amtsgericht Tübingen forelagt Domstolen to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Traktatens artikel 5, 7, 48, 52, 59 og 60.
By an order of 27 June 1991, which was received at the Court Registry on 1 July 1991, the Amtsgericht Tübingen referred two questions for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Articles 5, 7, 48, 52, 59 and 60 of the Treaty.
Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen er en græsk statsborger, der bor i Altensteig (Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland).
The applicant in the main proceedings is a Greek national residing in Altensteig, in the Federal Republic of Germany.