natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DOMMENE OG DE FREMSATTE FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE OFFENTLIGGØRES SENERE I "SAMLING AF AFGØRELSER", SOM ER ENESTE GYLDIGE UDGAVE.
OF THE INSTITUTION. HOWEVER, ONLY THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS PUBLISHED LATER IN THE REPORTS OF CASES BEFORE THE COURT IS AUTHENTIC.
Sag C-313/89: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Kongeriget Spanien
Case C-313/89:
"Traktatbrud - direktiv 80/155/EØF - uddannelse af jordemødre" (Domstolens plenum)
Commission of the European Communities ν Kingdom of Spain - 7 November 1991 (Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 80/155/EEC - Training of midwives) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgivet til Domstolen den 11. oktober 1989, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af EØF-Traktatens artikel 169 anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Kongeriget Spanien Nar tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Traktaten, idet det ikke inden for de fastsatte frister har vedtaget de bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 80/155/EØF af 21. januar 1980 om samordning af de administrativt eller ved lov fastsatte bestemmelser om adgang til og udøvelse af virksomhed som jordemoder (EFT L33, s. 8, herefter benævnt "direktivet").
By an application lodged at the Court Registry on 11 October 1989, the Commission of the European Communities sought a declaration that by not taking within the period prescribed the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 80/155/EEC of 21 January 1980 concerning the co-ordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to the taking up and pursuit of the activities of midwives (OJ L 33, p. 8, hereinafter "the directive"), the Kingdom of Spain had failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Kongeriget Spanien anerkendte, at direktivet ikke var blevet gennemført inden for de fastsatte frister.
The Kingdom of Spain acknowledged that the directive had not been implemented within the period prescribed.
Spanien gjorde i første række gældende, at den forpligtelse til at gennemføre direktivet senest ved Spaniens tiltrædelse af De Europæiske Fællesskaber den 1. januar 1986, som følger af artiklerne 392 og 395 i akten vedrørende vilkårene for Kongeriget Spaniens og Republikken Portugals tiltrædelse og tilpasningerne af traktaterne (EFT L302, s. 23), hverken er rimelig eller hensigtsmæssig.
The defendant contended, firstly, that the obligation to implement the directive on the date of Spain's accession to the European Communities, 1 January 1986, resulting from Articles 392 and 395 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties (OJ L 302, p. 23) was neither fair nor appropriate.
Denne argumentation fra Kongeriget Spaniens side, hvorved det anfægter en forpligtelse, som det selv har påtaget sig ved at tiltræde De Europæiske Fællesskaber, kunne under ingen omstændigheder tages til følge.
The Court held that that argument of the Kingdom of Spain, which sought to question the justification for an obligation that Spain itself accepted by its accession to the European Community, could not, in any event, be accepted.
Kongerifet Spanien gjorde endvidere gældende, at selv om den spanske jordemoáeruddannelse på tiltrædelsestidspunktet var forskellig fra den i direktivet fastlagte, var den ikke af en ringere kvalitet.
The Kingdom of Spain contended, secondly, that even though the training of midwives in Spain was different at the time of accession, it was not of inferior quality to the training provided for in the directive.
K*«§eriget Spanien har ikke overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler áét efter EØF-Traktaten, idet det ikke inden for de fastsatte frister har vedtaget de bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 80/155/EØF af 21. januar 1980 om samordning af de administrati vt eller ved lov fastsatte bestemmelser om adgang til og udøvelse af virksomhed som jordemoder.
By not taking within the period prescribed the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 80/155/EEC of 21 January 1980 concerning the co-ordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to the taking up and pursuit of the activities of midwives, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty.
Kongeriget Spanien betaler sagens omkostninger."
The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to pay the costs'.
Generaladvokat Carl Otto Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 19. september 1991.
Mr Advocate General Carl Otto Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991.
"Jeg foreslår Domstolen at kende følgende for ret:
"I propose that the Court should decide as follows:
Kongeriget Spanien har tilsidesat Traktaten, idet det ikke inden for de fastsatte frister har vedtaget alle nødvendige bestemmelser til gennemførelse af direktiv 80/155/EØF om samordning af de administrativt eller ved lov fastsatte bestemmelser om adgang til og udøvelse af virksomhed som jordemoder.
The Kingdom of Spain has breached the Treaty by not adopting within the period prescribed the measures necessary to implement Council Directive 80/155/EEC concerning the co-ordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to the taking up and pursuit of the activities of midwives;
Kongeriget Spanien betaler sagens omkostninger."
The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to pay the costs".
Ved kendelse af 9. november 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 22. januar 1990, havde Bundesverwaltungsgericht i medfør af EØF-Traktatens artikel 177 stillet et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende den fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser inden for landevejstransport.
By order of 9 November 1989, received at the Court on 22 January 1990, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court) referred for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty a question concerning the free movement of services in the road transport sector.
Virksomheden Pinaud Wieger ønskede at give en transportvirksomhed med hjemsted i Nederlandene i opdrag at udføre fjerngodstransport i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland.
The undertaking Pinaud Wieger wished to commission Transvenlo, a carrier established in the Netherlands, to carry out the long-distance transport of goods within the Federal Republic of Germany.
I denne anledning havde Pinaud Wieger ansøgt sagsøgte om godkendelse.
In order to do so, it sought authorization from the Bundesanstalt für den Güterfernverkehr (Federal Office for the long-distance carriage of goods).
Denne afslog at meddele godkendelse med den begrundelse, at indenlandsk godstransport kun måtte udføres af en virksomhed, der havde hjemsted i Tyskland.
That authorization was refused on the ground that only undertakings established in Germany may transport goods within that country.
Pinaud Wieger anlagde derefter anerkendelsessøgsmål med påstand om, at det statueredes, at virksomheden lovligt kunne benytte Transvenlo til udførelse af godstransporter i Tyskland og indgå aftale om transportvederlag, der var lavere end de vederlag, der er fastsat af de tyske myndigheder i henhold til den relevante lovgivning.
Pinaud Wieger then brought an action seeking a declaration that it was entitled to arrange for Transvenlo to carry out the long-distance transport of goods within the Federal Republic of Germany and to agree for that purpose on carriage costs lower than those determined by the German authorities in accordance with the Güterkraftverkehrsgesetz (Law on the carriage of goods by road).
Til støtte for sin påstand gjorde virksomheden gældende, at de begrænsninger vedrørende ydelser fra transportvirksomheder, som har hjemsted i andre EF-medlemsstater, hvor de har tilladelse til godstransport, der er fastsat i den nationale lov, som følge af den umiddelbare virkning af Traktatens artikel 59, nu var sat ud af kraft.
In support of its action, it claimed that the direct effect of Article 59 rendered invalid the national legislation's restrictions on services provided by transport undertakings established in other Member States of the Community, where they had obtained authorization to transport goods.
Domstolen fastslog, at Rådet med hensyn til gennemførelse af den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser inden for denne sektor i strid med Traktaten havde undladt at fastsætte de betingelser, under hvilke transportvirksomheder har adgang til at udføre indenlandske transporter i en medlemsstat, hvor de ikke har hjemsted. Domstolen fandt, at Rådet havde
The Court pointed out that in Case 13/83 (Parliament ν Council [1985] ECR 1513) it had held that, in breach of the Treaty, the Council had failed to lay down, as part of the liberalization of services in the sector in question, the conditions under which nonresident carriers may operate
- 4 - en rimelig frist til at gennemføre de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige til opfyldelse af dommen.
In the same judgment the Court had held that the Council had had a reasonable period within which to adopt the measure necessary in order to comply with the aforementioned judgment.
Henset til vejcabotagetransportsektorens kompleksitet fandt Domstolen, at der fortsat var betydelige vanskeligheder for gennemførelsen af den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser på dette område.
Owing to the complexity of the road sector, considerable difficulties still precluded the implementation of the freedom to provide services in that sector.
På denne baggrund var Rådet beføjet til trinvis at gennemføre en liberalisering af landevejscabotagevirksomhed.
Accordingly, the Council was empowered to commence implementation of the liberalization of cabotage in a progressive manner.
Domstolen besvarede det forelagte spørgsmål således:
The Court ruled:
"På fællesskabsrettens nuværende udviklingstrin er EØF-Traktatens artikel 59 og 60 ikke til hinder for, at en medlemsstat forbyder en virksomhed, som har hjemsted dér, at indgå aftale med en transportvirksomhed i en anden medlemsstat, hvorefter denne skal levere tjenesteydelser i form af indenlandsk godstransport til de i den første stat sædvanlige tariffer, og under anvendelse af køretøjer, der er godkendt til godstransport i den anden stat."
"Under Community law as it stands, Articles 59 and 60 of the EEC Treaty do not preclude an undertaking established in one Member State from being prohibited from appointing a carrier in another Member State to provide on its behalf internal transport at rates generally in force in the first Member State, using vehicles licensed in the second Member State for goods transport".
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (plenum) den 2. juli 1991.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 2 July 1991.
"På grundlag af disse betragtninger skal jeg foreslå Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
"Having made the foregoing observations, I propose that the Court should rule as follows:
Rådet har ved udstedelse af forordning (EØF) nr. 4059/89 af 21. december 1989 påbegyndt opfyldelsen af de forpligtelser, der påhviler det i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 75, stk. 1, litra b), med hensyn til landevejstransport.
By adopting Regulation (EEC) No 4059/89 of 21 December 1989, the Council started to fulfil its obligations under Article 75(1)(b) of the EEC Treaty in relation to road transport.
Udenlandske transportvirksomheders adgang til at udføre indenlandsk vejtransport i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor virksomheden har hjemsted, er - indtil den 31. december 1992, fra hvilket tidspunkt den ikke længere finder anvendelse - omfattet af den overgangsordning, der blev indført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4059/89 af 21. december 1989.
Authorization of nonresident carriers to operate road transport services within a Member State other than the one in which they are established is governed by the transitional scheme established by Regulation (EEC) No 4059/89 of 21 December 1989 until 31 December 1992, the date on which that regulation will cease to apply.
I henhold til forordningens artikel 5 er udførelsen af vejcabotagetransport undergivet nationale bestemmelser med hensyn til priser og betingelser for transportkontrakter i den medlemsstat, hvor ydelsen udføres, således at disse skal finde anvendelse på ikkehjemmehørende transportvirksomheder på samme betingelser som dem, medlemsstaten pålægger de i staten hjemmehørende virksomheder, idet disse bestemmelser skal være i overensstemmelse med Traktaten, og navnlig dennes bestemmelser om konkurrenceret."
Pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation No 4059/89, the performance of cabotage transport operations is to be subject to the national provisions relating to the rates and conditions governing the transport contract in force in the Member State in which the service is carried out, provisions which must be applied to nonresident carriers under the same conditions applied by the Member State in question to its own nationals, it being understood that the aforementioned provisions must, moreover, comply with the rules of the Treaty, and in particular those relating to competition law".
Sag C-22/90: Den Franske Republik mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-22/90 French Republic ν Commission of the European Communities - 7 November 1991 (EAGGF - Disallowed expenditure - Supplementary levy on milk) (Full Court)
7.11.1991 "EUGFL - manglende godkendelse af udgifter - tillægsafgift på mælk" (Domstolens plenum)
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 24 January 1990, the French Republic brought an action under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that Commission Decision 89/627/EEC of 15 November 1989 on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1987 of the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (Official Journal L 359, p.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 24. januar 1990 havde Den Franske Republik i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 173 anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 89/627/EØF af 15. november 1989 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1987, der er finansieret gennem Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget, Garantisektionen (EFT L 359, s. 23), for så vidt det i denne beslutning lægges til grund, at den samlede garantimængde for mælkeleverancerne er overskredet med 5.192 tons for mejeri året 1986/1987.
23) in so far as it found that the total guaranteed quantity for milk deliveries had been exceeded by 5 192 tonnes in marketing year 1986/1987, was void
De gældende fællesskabsbestemmelser
The applicable Community provisions
Ordningen med tillægsafgift på mælk indebærer, at én og samme producent kan få tildelt to referencemængder, den ene på grundlag af sine leverancer til mejeriet og den anden på grundlag af sit salg til forbrugeren.
The Court stated that the supplementary milk levy scheme meant that one and the same producer could be entitled to two reference quantities: one in respect of his deliveries to dairies and the second in respect of his sales to the consumer.
Artikel 6 a i forordning nr. 857/84 bestemmer, at producenter, som således råder over to referencemængder, "kan efter anmodning og for at tage hensyn til ændringer i deres afsætningsmønster få forhøjet den ene af de to referencemængder inden for en periode på tolv måneder.
Article 6a of Regulation No 857/84 provides that producers so entitled "may, on request, obtain an increase in one of the reference quantities within a 12-month period to enable them to adapt to changes in their marketing requirements.
Det er en forudsætning for forhøjelsen, at den anden referencemængde i samme periode på tolv måneder nedsættes tilsvarende".
Any such increase shall be subject to a reduction of the same amount in the other reference quantity during the same 12-month period".
Ifølge den franske regering kunne denne bestemmelse ikke betyde, at producenten samtidig i det pågældende mejeriår både udøver virksomhed med direkte salg og virksomhed med leverancer til mejeriet.
According to the French Government, that provision did not mean that the producer simultaneously, during the same marketing year, sold directly to the public and made deliveries to dairies.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse forudsætter overførsel mellem referencemængderne på grundlag af direkte salg og referencemængderne på grundlag af leverancer til mejeriet, at producenterne faktisk i det pågældende mejeriår foretager både direkte salg og leverancer til mejeriet.
The Court pointed out that in the opinion of the Commission, a precondition for the transfer of reference quantities in respect of direct sales and reference quantities in respect of deliveries to dairies was that the producers' business during the marketing year in question actually involved both direct sales and deliveries to dairies.
Domstolen fandt ikke, at Kommissionens argumentation kunne lægges til grund.
The Court stated that that argument put forward by the Commission could not be accepted.
Dens fortolkning, som baseredes på ordlyden af den pågældende forskrift, måtte være i overensstemmelse med dens formål, der er at gøre det muligt for producenter med to referencemængder at tage hensyn til ændringer i deres afsætningsmønster.
That interpretation, based on the wording of the provision in question, was consistent with the objective of the provision, which was to enable producers who were recipients of two reference quantities to adapt to changes in their marketing requirements.
Da virkningerne af en sådan ændring kan række videre end til et mejeriår, ville opnåelsen af dette formål ikke fuldt ud være sikret, såfremt artikel 6 a blev fortolket således, at de producenter var udelukket fra dens anvendelsesområde, som ikke faktisk i løbet af samme mejeriår foretog både direkte salg og leverancer til mejeriet.
Since the effects of such changes could extend over more than one marketing year, that objective could not fully achieved if Article 6a were interpreted as meaning that producers not actually selling directly and delivering to dairies during the same marketing year were excluded from the scope of that provision.
Kommissionens beslutning 89/627/EØF af 15. november 1989 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1987, der er finansieret gennem Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget, Garantisektionen, annulleres, for så vidt der heri lægges til grund, at den samlede garantimængde for mælkeleverancerne er overskredet med 5.192 tons for mejeri året 1986/1987.
Commission Decision 89/627/EEC of 15 November 1989 on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1987 of the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund is declared void in so far as it finds that the total guaranteed quantity for milk deliveries was exceeded by 5 192 tonnes in marketing year 1986/1987.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse under retsmødet den 26. juni 1991.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 26 June 1991.
"Jeg foreslår Domstolen at annullere Kommissionens beslutning 89/627/EØF af 15. november 1989 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1987, der er finansieret gennem Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget (EUGFL), Garantisektionen, for så vidt den pålægger Frankrig en tillægsafgift for 1986/1987 på 10.569.874 ffr. pga. manglende godkendelse af 28.540 tons overførsler i henhold til artikel 6 a i Rådets forordning nr. 857/84.
"I propose that the Court should declare Commission Decision 89/627/EEC of 15 November 1989 on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1987 of the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund void in so far as it imposes on France a supplementary levy for the marketing year 1986/87 of 10 569 874 on account of its failure to allow transfers, of the amount of 28 540 tonnes, under Article 6a of Regulation No 857/84.
Jeg foreslår også, at Kommissionen dømmes til at betale sagens omkostninger."
I propose that the Court should also order the Commission to pay the costs".
Sag C-309/90: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Hellenske Republik
Case C-309/90 Commission of the European Communities ν Hellenic Republic - 7 November 1991 (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Professional activities in architecture) (Full Court)
7.11.1991 "En stats traktatbrud - erhvervsvirksomhed inden for arkitekturområdet" (Domstolens plenum)
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 9 October 1990, the Commission brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that that by failing to adopt and to communicate to the Commission within the prescribed periods the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Council Directives 85/384/EEC of 10 June
Den græske regering bestred ikke, at Den Hellenske Republik ved udløbet af den frist, der var fastsat i den begrundede udtalelse, ikke havde truffet de foranstaltninger, der var nødvendige for at efterkomme direktiverne.
The Court pointed out that the Hellenic Republic did not dispute that on the date on which the time-limit prescribed by the reasoned opinion expired it had not adopted the measures necessary in order to comply with the directive at issue.
Den Hellenske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktaten, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har vedtaget eller meddelt Kommissionen de love eller administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme Rådets direktiver 85/384/EØF, 85/614/EØF og 86/17/EØF om gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser, certifikater og andre kvalifikationsbeviser inden for arkitekturområdet, herunder om foranstaltninger, som skal lette den faktiske udøvelse af retten til etablering og fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser.
By failing to adopt and to communicate to the Commission, within the prescribed periods, the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Council Directives 85/384/EEC of 10 June 1985 on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services, 85/614/EEC of 20 December 1985 amending, on account of the accession of Spain and Portugal, Directive 85/384/EEC and 86/17/EEC of 27 January 1986 amending, on account of the accession of Portugal, Directive 85/384/EEC, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 1. oktober 1991.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 1 October 1991.
(Tjenestemandssag) "Bedømmelsesrapport - beskrivelse af arbejdsopgaverne" (Tredje Afdeling)
Case T-33/90 von Bonkewitz-Lindner ν Parliament - 6 November 1991 (Staff case) (Staff report - Job description) (Third Chamber)
II - FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
Before the Court of Justice
Sag C-33/90
Case C-33/90
5.11.1991 En stats traktatbrud - tilsidesættelse af EØF-Traktatens artikel 5, af artiklerne 5 og 6 i Rådets direktiv 75/442/EØF om affald og af artiklerne 6 og 12 i Rådets direktiv 78/319/EØF om giftigt og farligt affald - de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for, at der i regionen Campania planlægges, organiseres og føres tilsyn med bortskaffelse af affald, ikke truffet - forpligtelse til at tilstille Kommissionen oplysninger - forpligtelsen ikke overholdt.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Infringement of Article 5 of the EEC Treaty, Articles 5 and 6 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Articles 6 and 12 of Council Directive 78/319/EEC on toxic and dangerous waste - Failure to adopt the measures necessary to ensure in the region of Campania the planning, organization and supervision of waste disposal operations -Obligation to forward information to the Commission - Not fulfilled.