natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
»Begrebet arbejdstager i forbindelse med familieydelser, som udbetales efter tysk lovgivning med hjemmel i artikel 73 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, som ændret og ajourført ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af Ζ juni 1983, og som ændret ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3427/89 af 30. oktober 1989, skal forstås således, at det alene omfatter arbejdstagere, som omfattes af den definition, der fremgår af bestemmelserne i artikel 1, litra a), ti), sammenholdt med forordningens bilag I, afsnit I, afdeling C. I øvrigt har gennemgangen af de præjudicielle spørgsmål intet frembragt, der kan rejse tvivl om gyldigheden af det nævnte bilag.
By its questions, the national court essentially asks first whether, in accordance with Article 73 of the Regulation, the expression 'employed persons' must be interpreted as designating only employed persons who satisfy the definition resulting from the combined provisions of Article l(a)(ii) and the Annex for the purposes of paying family benefits under the German legislation. If so, the national court asks whether the Annex is valid having regard to Article 48(2) of the Treaty.
EF-traktatens artikel 48, stk 2, skal imidlertid fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for anvendelsen af nationale bestemmelser, der medfører, at en vandrende arbejdstager, hvis børn har bopæl i en anden medlemsstat, ikke kan få udbetalt familieydelser f or de hele kalendermåneder, der indgår i en længere ferie uden løn, hvorimod de arbejdstagere, hvis børn har bopæl i den pågældende stat, er berettiget til ydelser.·
Lastly, if the Annex is valid, the national court asks whether Article 48(2) of the Treaty precludes the application of national legislation which results in an employed person whose children are domiciled in another Member State being refused family allowances in respect of full calendar months falling within an extended period of unpaid leave, where employed persons whose children are domiciled in the State concerned are entitled to such allowances. Those three aspects may conveniently be considered in turn.
Generaladvokat N. Fennelly fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjelle Afdeling) den 6. marts 1997.
The persons covered by the Regulation are defined by Article 2, which forms part of Title I, entitled 'General provisions'.
Han foreslog heri Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
Such benefits are granted on the basis of the relevant provisions of national law, in this case the Bundeskindergeldgesetz (Federal Child Benefit Act; 'BKGG').
»Bilag I, afsnit I, afdeling C, litra a), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, er ikke i strid med traktatens artikel 48 og 51.
The expression 'employed persons' means any person who is insured under one of the social security schemes referred to in Article 1(a) for the contingencies and on the conditions mentioned in that provision.
En national bestemmelse, hvorefter det er en forudsætning for retten til at få udbetalt familieydelser, at den pågældende arbejdstagers børn normalt bor eller opholder sig i den medlemsstat, hvor der ansøges om ydelser, kan imidlertid ikke anvendes på de af traktatens artikel 48 omhandlede arbejdstagere, der også under en ferie uden løn beskæftigelsesmæssigt opretholder en virkelig forbindelse til denne medlemsstat, i det omfang denne bestemmelse fører til, at arbejdstagere, hvis børn bor i udlandet, frakendes retten til familieydelser i de hele kalendermåneder, der omfattes af en langvarig ferie uden løn, mens arbejdstagere, hvis børn bor i den pågældende medlemsstat, har ret dertil.
A person in the situation of the appellant must be held to come within the definition of 'employed person', in particular within the meaning of Article l(a)(i) of the Regulation, in so far as he is insured, compulsorily or on an optional continued basis, for one or more of the contingencies covered by the branches of a social security scheme for employed or self-employed persons.
Myndighederne i den medlemsstat, hvor ansøgning indgives, har kompetence til efter en analogi at anvende de fællesskabsretlige regler, hvorved det navnlig kan sikres, at den ydelse, der er ansøgt om, faktisk anvendes til de børns underhold, over for hvilke der er forsørgerpligt, og at kumulation af ydelser undgås.«
Furthermore, it does not follow from the Annex that, in situations other than those to which it refers, Community nationals who work in Germany and whose children reside in another Member State have no entitlement to family benefits. As a result, in so far as the appellant in the main proceedings has lost his entitlement to family benefits in respect of the two periods of unpaid leave at issue, it is by operation of the provisions of the BKGG, not of the Annex to the Regulation.
Sag C-138/96 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland Landbrug
The Court has pointed out on a number of occasions that the principle of equal treatment to which that provision gives expression prohibits not only overt discrimination based on nationality but also all covert forms of discrimination which, by applying other distinguishing criteria, achieve in practice the same result.
Den tyske regering bestrider ikke det påståede traktatbrud.
his dependent children are domiciled or habitually reside in that territory.
Den har anført, at loven cm sundhedsmæssig kontrol med fjerkrækød er blevet kundgjort den 23. juli 1996 {Bundesgesetzblatt I, s. 991), og at proceduren for udstedelsen af gennemførelsesbestemmelser til loven, og dermed til gennemførelse af direktivet, vil være afsluttet senest ved udgangen af 1996.
Also, it is undisputed that Article 48(2) of the Treaty applies in this case since the person concerned continued to be insured in Germany against the risk of sickness, by reason of his employment relationship, during a period covered by the two calendar months at issue.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolen den 25. april 19% har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 92/116/EØF af 17. december 1992 (herefter »direktivet«) og EF-traktaten, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har sat de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme direktivet.
In so far as the case-file contains no material capable of providing objective justification for that difference in treatment, it must be regarded as discriminatory and therefore as incompatible with Article 48(2) of the Treaty.
Efter den tyske regerings opfattelse har den forsinkede gennemførelse af direktivet ikke hindret samhandelen i Fællesskabet, hvorfor den har anmodet Domstolen om at udsætte nærværende sag indtil udstedelsen af de nationale gennemførelsesbestemmelser.
In the present case, Mr Merino Garcia has been refused entitlement to family allowances for his children residing in Spain, whereas the BKGG allows such benefits to be granted to anyone who has his domicile or habitual residence within the territory to which that law applies, provided that
Direktivet bestemmer, at medlemsstaterne skal sætte de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme direktivet inden den 1. januar 1994 undtagen for så vidt angår virksomheder, der er beliggende bl.a. i de af Forbundsrepublikken Tysklands nye delstater, som er omfattet af omstruktureringsplaner, for hvilke gennemførelsen af direktivet skal ske senest den 1. januar 1995.
'In accordance with Article 73 of the Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3427/89 of 30 October 1989, the expression 'employed persons' must be construed as designating only employed persons who satisfy the definition resulting from the combined provisions of Article l(a)(ii) of the Regulation and Point I C of Annex I thereto, for the purposes of paying family benefits under the German legislation.
Da gennemførelsen af direktivet ikke er foretaget inden den heri fastsatte frist, må der gives Kommissionen medhold i, at det påståede traktatbrud foreligger.
Advocate General N. Fennelly delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 6 March 1997.
•1) Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 92/116/EØF af 17. december 1992 om ændring og ajourføring af direktiv 71/118/EØF om sundhedsmæssige problemeri forbindelse med handel med fersk fjerkrækød og EF-traktaten, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har sat de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme direktivet
However, a national rule requiring, as a prerequisite to entitlement to child allowance, that the claimant's children be domiciled or normally resident in the Member State where the allowance is claimed, may not be applied in respect of workers who come within the scope of Article 48 of the Treaty and who, though on unpaid leave, maintain a genuine and continuous employment relationship in that Member State, in so far as its application leads to a situation where such workers have no right to child allowance in respect of full calendar months included within extended periods of unpaid leave in circumstances where other workers whose children are resident in that Member State do have such a right.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 15. april 1997.
in particular, that the allowance claimed is in fact used for the upkeep of dependent children and to avoid the occurrence of overlapping payments.'
»1) at fastslå, at Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 92/116/EØF af 17. december 1992 om ændring og ajourføring af direktiv 71/118/EØF om sundhedsmæssige problemer i forbindelse med handel med fersk fjerkrækød, iden den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har udstedt de ved lov eller administrativt fastsatte bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivet
(Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 92/116/EEC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period) (Sixth Chamber)
2) at dømme Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland til at betale samtlige sagens omkostninger«.
It has, however, pointed out that the Law on health measures applicable to poultrymeat was published on 23 July 1996 (Bundesgesetzblatt I, p.
Sag T-504/93 Tiercé Ladbroke SA / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Konkurrence
amending and updating Directive 71 ¡1181 EEC on health problems affecting trade in fresh poultrymeat, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fidfil its obligations under that directive;
Annullationssøgsmål — afvisning af en klage — artikel 86 — relevant marked — kollektivt dominerende stilling — afslag på meddelelse af en licens til transmission — artikel 85, stk 1 — forbud mod retransmission (Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
He proposed that the Court should hold the Federal Republic of Germany in breach of its obligations and order it to pay the costs.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Court of First Instance
Sag T-104/96 Ludwig Krämer / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Personalesag
Case T-237/95 Fernando Carbajo Ferrerò ν European Parliament Staff case
•Tjenestemand — afgørelse om en stillings indplacering i lønklasse — åbenbarfejlvurdering — retligfejlvurdering - magtfordrejning — vedtægtens artikel 7· (Fjerde Afdeling)
(Officials — Internal competition — Appointment to a post as Head of Division (First Chamber)
I besvarelse af det fjerde og det sjette spørgsmål:
In September 1989, Ladbroke asked DSV to grant it the right to retransmit the French sound and pictures in Belgium.
Præjudiciel — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — fortolkning af Bruxelles-konventionens artikel 5, nr. 1, og artikel 24 — kompetence til at træffe bestemmelse om foreløbige, herunder sikrende, retsmidler — særlige rettergangsformer - afgørelse under en sag om foreløbige forholdsregler om, at skyldneren pålægges at betale etforeløbigt beløb — en voldgiftsags betydning for sagens realitet
Tiercé Ladbroke SA ('Ladbroke') is a subsidiary company governed by Belgian law, set up in 1982 by Ladbroke Group Pic, whose business consists in making a book in Belgium on horse races run abroad.
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 10. juni 1997.
On 27 July 1990, Ladbroke wrote to PMU and each of the sociétés de courses requesting details of the financial and technical conditions for subscribing to the 'Courses en direct service.
Han foreslog heri følgende besvarelser:
By letter of 8 August 1990, PMU replied to Ladbroke.
•1) En rets kompetence i sager om kontraktforhold i medfør af artikel 5, nr. 1,
PMU has exclusive responsibility for organizing off-course betting in France, under the pari mutuel (totalizator) system, on horse races organized by authorized sociétés de courses.
I besvarelse af det femte spørgsmål:
PMU also has exclusive rights to take bets abroad on races organized in France and bets in France on races organized abroad.
I henhold til konventionens artikel 24 er det uden betydning, om der er indbragt eller senere vil blive indbragt et søgsmål til påkendelse af sagens realitet, for så vidt der efter national ret er adgang til for en ret at indbringe et søgsmål til påkendelse af sagens realitet.
On 9 October 1990, Ladbroke lodged a complaint with the Commission under Article 3(2)(b) of Regulation No 17 of the Council of 6 February 1962, First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty (hereinafter 'Regulation No 17'), in which it asked the Commission to bring to an end an infringement of Article 85 and/or Article 86 of the EEC Treaty by the principal French sociétés de courses, PMU, PMI and DSV. It also asked the Commission to adopt interim measures.
I besvarelse af det syvende spørgsmål: i konventionen om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgerlige sager, herunder handelssager, undertegnet i Bruxelles den 27. september 1968, afhænger ikke af karakteren af den sag, der er indbragt for den.
Pari Mutuel International ('PMI') is a public limited company governed by French law in which PMU is the majority shareholder. Its objects are to exploit outside France televised pictures of and information on horse races organized in France.
Navnlig kan en ret i en kontraherende stat i medfør af artikel 5, nr. 1, have kompetence til at påkende et krav under en sag om foreløbige forholdsregler, som går ud på, ved hjælp af en umiddelbart gældende forholdsregel og på forhånd, at opnå, at skyldneren pålægges at betale et beløb til fordringshaveren, idet denne kompetence ikke er betinget af vilkår, der ikke fremgår af artikel 5, nr. 1, som f.eks. et vilkår om, at afgørelsen skal kunne fuldbyrdes i den stat, hvori retten er beliggende.
Pursuant to a contract concluded on 9 January 1990, which took effect on 1 August 1989, PMU, to which the sociétés de courses had granted the right to market television pictures and sound commentaries on horse races organized by them, assigned that right to PMI for the Federal Republic of Germany and Austria.
Det er ligeledes uden betydning, om rettens kompetence i henhold til konventionens artikel 24 udspringer af en bestemmelse i national ret, jf. herved konventionens artikel 3, stk. 2. Rettens kompetence i henhold til konventionens artikel 24 er ikke betinget af, at den forholdsregel, som retten træffer bestemmelse om, kan fuldbyrdes i den stat, hvori retten er beliggende.«
In its complaint, Ladbroke took issue both with the direct refusal of the sociétés de courses, PMU and PMI, and with the indirect refusal of DSV, to provide it with the French sound and pictures for its betting outlets in Belgium, although it pointed out that, in so far as DSV's conduct consisted solely in giving effect to the contractual restrictions imposed on it by the other parties to which the complaint related, its complaint did not seek to impute any liability to DSV under Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty or Regulation No 17.
Den omstændighed, at den af parterne indgåede kontrakt indeholder en voldgiftsklausul, har i givet fald
A version of the answers given by PMU and PMI, from which information of a confidential nature had been removed, was subsequently made available to the complainant.
1.6.1992, men som erstatter en tidligere foretaget beregning, der er blevet tilbagekaldt af den kompetente institution efter Domstolens dom af 18.21993 i sag C-193/92, Bogana - opretholdehe af erhvervede rettigheder
By letter dated 19 March 1991, Ladbroke pointed out to the Commission that it was dear from PMU's reply to the request for information that it intended to commercialize the Frendi sound and pictures in Belgium in collaboration with third parties, not including Ladbroke.
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling') den 12. juni 1997.
By letter dated 11 November 1992, sent pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation No 99/63, the Commission informed Ladbroke that it was not minded to uphold its complaint.
Han foreslog heri følgende besvarelse:
By letter dated 13 January 1993, Ladbroke submitted its observations in reply to the Commission's letter of 11 November 1992.
Præjudiciel — Corte d'Appello di Venezia -fortolkning af artikel 2 i Rådets forordning {EØF) nr. 1679179 af 24. juli 1979 om efteropkrævning af import- eller eksportafgifter, der ikke er opkrævet hos debitor for varer, der er angivet ved en toldprocedure, som medfører en forpligtelse til at betale sådanne afgifter — frist på tre år til at fremsætte krav om efterbetaling af ikke-betalte afgifter — anvendelse i forbindelse med begivenheder, der fandt sted forud for tidspunktet for forordningens ikrafttrædelse
With regard more particularly to competition law, an area in which the involvement of the persons concerned by the procedures leading to the adoption of decisions under Regulation No 17 is of decisive importance, the Community judicature must consider itself to be seised of all such matters of fact and law contained in the application or in the complainant's observations as were taken into account by the Commission in reaching the decision to close the file on the complaint.
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 12. juni 1997.
Consequently, in the event of proceedings against such a decision, the Community judicature must be regarded also as being seised of all the matters of fact or of law brought to the complainant's notice by the Commission in response to its complaint.
»Reglerne i artikel 95a, stk. 1-3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1248/92 af 30. april 1992 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, og forordning (EØF) nr. 574/72 om regler til gennemførelse af forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 skal fortolkes således, at de ikke finder anvendelse, hvor ret til en ydelse er tillagt før ikrafttrædelsen af den nævnte forordning, uanset at afgørelsen herom på et senere tidspunkt er ophævet og erstattet med en anden afgørelse for at berigtige en forkert beregning af ydelsernes størrelse efter de hidtidige regler.
By a decision contained in a letter dated 24 June 1993, the Commission, dealing only with the main arguments put forward by Ladbroke in its observations of 13 January 1993, definitively rejected Ladbroke's complaint on the grounds contained both in that decision and in the letter sent pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation No 99/63.
Reglen i artikel 95a, stk. 4, i samme forordning er til hinder for, at en medlemsstats myndigheder af egen drift nedsætter ydelser, der er tillagt før ikrafttrædelsen af forordningen.«
Ladbroke brought the present action by application lodged at the Court of First Instance on 31 August 1993.
»Artikel 2 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1697/79 af 24. juli 1979 om efteropkrævning af import- eller eksportafgifter, der ikke er opkrævet hos debitor for varer, der er angivet til en toldprocedure, som medfører en forpligtelse til at betale sådanne afgifter, skal fortolkes således, at bestemmelsen ikke finder anvendelse på efteropkrævning af afgifter, der skulle have været betalt i forbindelse med begivenheder, der fandt sted forud for den 1. juli 1980.«
In this case, therefore, the Commission was entitled to reject the applicant's complaint both on the grounds contained in the letter sent pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation No 99/63 and on those set out in the contested decision, while intimating that its decision would deal only with such of the applicant's arguments as called for an additional response on its part.
Præjudiciel —Amtsgericht Reutlingen —fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 6 og 48 — anvendelse af høflige tiltaleformer under en straffesag
It then puts forward two pleas in law alleging, respectively, misapplication of Articles 86 and 85 of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 12. juni 1997.
It follows from the foregoing that the plea is unfounded and must therefore be rejected.
Sag C-43/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
This plea has four limbs. In the first two, the applicant claims that the Commission wrongly defined the product market and the geographical market in question.
Sag C-354/96 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
First limb: definition of the relevant product market
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende udstedelse af de ved lov eller administrativt fastsatte bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 93/36/EØF af 14. juni 1993 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved offentlige indkøb.
According to settled case-law, for the purposes of applying Artide 86 of the Treaty, the relevant product or service market includes products or services which are substitutable or sufficiently interchangeable with the product or service in question, not only in terms of their objective characteristics, by virtue of which they are particularly suitable for satisfying the constant needs of consumers, but also in terms of the conditions of competition and/or the structure of supply and demand on the market in question.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Rådets direktiv 91/674IEØF af 19. december 1991 om forsiknngssekkabersårsregnskaberogkonsoliderede regnskaber
The claim that there was no, or no adequate, statement of reasons
Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 12. juni 1997.
However, referring to the conditions of competition prevailing on the betting market in Germany as between the various races, it concluded that the relevant market was the retransmission of sound and pictures of horse races in general.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål - manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Rådets direktiv 80/68/EØF af 17. december 1979 om beskyttelse af grundvandet mod forurening forårsaget af visse farlige stoffer
Moreover, it is to be noted that, in Belgium, betting outlets may make a book only on horse races run abroad and that, at the material time, the sound and pictures of British races were the only ones being retransmitted in Belgian betting outlets.
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om i medfør af artikel 10 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2085/93 af 20. juli 1993 (EFT L 193, s. 44) at frigøre resten af den finansielle fællesskabsstøtte til et drikkevandsprojekt i Toscana som led i det integrerede middelhavsprogram (projekt 88.20.IT.006.0)
It follows that, in Belgium, there was at least one product other than the transmission of the sound and pictures of French races which was comparable in terms of its technical characteristics and use.