natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det fastslås, at Kongeriget Nederlandene har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Traktaten, idet det ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger til at efterkomme artikel 4 og 8 i Rådets direktiv 84/253/EØF af 10. april 1984 på grundlag af Traktatens artikel 54, stk. 3, litra g), om autorisation af personer, der skal foretage lovpligtig revision af regnskaber.
Declare that by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the measures necessary to comply with Articles 4 and 8 of Council Directive 84/253/EEC of 10 April 1984, based on Article 54(3)(g) of the EEC Treaty, on the approval of persons responsible for carrying out the statutory audits of accounting documents, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty;
Hver part bærer sine omkostninger."
Dismiss the remainder of the application;
"Traktatbrud - restriktioner for indførsel af sæd fra okser og svin bestemt til insemination" (Domstolens plenum)
17.11.1992 (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Restrictions concerning the importation of semen originating from bovine and porcine animals which is intended to be used for artificial insemination) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indleveret den 17. september 1991, havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastsloges, at Irland havde tilsidesat sine for pligtelser efter Traktatens artikel 30, Rådets forordning nr. 805/68/EØF og nr. 827/68/EØF, Rådets direktiv 77/504/EØF samt Kommissionens beslutning 88/124/EØF ved at have fastsat en række restriktioner for indførslen af sæd fra tamkvæg og -svin og gjort denne betinget af en tilladelse.
By application lodged on 17 September 1991, the Commission brought an action for a declaration that, by making all imports of semen originating from domestic bovine and porcine animals subject to a licence and to various restrictive conditions, Ireland had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the EEC Treaty, Regulation No 805/68/EEC of the Council, Regulation No 827/68/EEC of the Council, Council Directive 77/504/EEC, and Commission Decision 88/124/EEC.
Irland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EØF-Traktatens artikel 30, Rådets forordning nr 805/68/EØF af 27. juni 1968 om den fælles markedsordning for oksekød, Rådets forordning nr. 827/68/EØF af 28. juni 1968 om den fælles markedsordning for visse varer, der er anført i bilag II til Traktaten, Rådets direktiv 77/85/EØF af 25 juli 1977 om racerent aviskvæg, samt Kommissionens beslutning 88/124/EØF af 21. januar 1988 om ud formningen af afstamningscertifikater for sæd og embryoner af racerent aviskvæg og de oplysninger, certifikaterne skal indeholde, idet Irland har fastsat en række restriktioner for indførslen af sæd fra tamkvæg og -svin og gjort denne betinget af en tilladelse.
By making imports of semen originating from domestic bovine and porcine animals subject to a licence and to various restrictive conditions, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the EEC Treaty, Regulation No 805/68/EEC of the Council of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in beef and veal, Regulation No 827/68/EEC of the Council of 28 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in certain products listed in Annex II to the Treaty, Council Directive 77/504/EEC of 25 July 1977 on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species and Commission Decision 88/124/EEC of 21 January 1988 laying down the specimen pedigree certificates for the semen and embryos of pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species and the particulars to be entered on those certificates;
Generaladvokat Claus Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. oktober 1992.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 14 October 1992.
"at Irland ved at opretholde et almindeligt system med importlicenser gældende for import af sæd fra tyre og orner og ved ikke på bindende og klar måde at fastlægge de betingelser, der skal gælde ved indførsel af denne vare, har overtrådt sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 30.
"Declare that by maintaining a general import licensing system applicable to the importation of semen from bulls and swine and by not laying down in a binding and clear manner the conditions which are to apply to the importation of those goods, the Irish Government has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the EEC Treaty;
Jeg finder tillige, at Irland skal afholde sagens omkostninger."
Order Ireland to pay the costs."
"Traktatbrud - godkendelse af racerent kvæg til avlsbrug" (Domstolens plenum)
17.11.1992 (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Acceptance for breeding purposes of pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indleveret den 17. september 1991 havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastsloges, at Irland havde tilsidesat sine for pligtelser dels efter Rådets direktiv 87/328/EØF, navnlig direktivets artikel 6, dels efter EØF-Traktaten, ved ikke at have udstedt de love og administrative bestemmelser, som er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivet.
By application lodged on 17 September 1991, the Commission brought an action for a declaration that by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 87/328/EEC, Ireland had failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive, in particular Article 6 thereof, and under the EEC Treaty.
Irland har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser dels efter Rådets direktiv 87/328/EØF af 18. juni 1987 om godkendelse af racerent aviskvæg til avlsbrug, navnlig direktivets artikel 6, dels efter EØF-Traktaten, ved ikke at have udstedt de love og administrative bestemmelser, som er nødvendige for at efter komme direktivet. Irland betaler sagens omkostninger."
By failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 87/328/EEC of 18 June 1987 on the acceptance for breeding purposes of pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and in particular Article 6 thereof and under the EEC Treaty;
"at tage Kommissionens påstand til følge og dømme Irland til at afholde sagens omkostninger."
"Uphold the Commission's claim and order Ireland to pay the costs."
"Ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder - social sikring - alderspension -tillæg for ægtefælle der forsørges" (Anden Afdeling)
19.11.1992 (Equal treatment of men and women - Social security - Old-age pension -Supplementary allowance for dependent spouse) (Second Chamber)
Ved kendelse af 24. juli 1991, indgået til Domstolen den 10. september s.a., havde Raad van Beroep, Amsterdam, forelagt en række præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF.
By order of 24 July 1991, received by the Court on 10 September 1991, the Raad van Beroep (Social Security Court), Amsterdam, referred several questions for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Council Directive 79/7/EEC.
Da J. Molenbroek fyldte 65 år, fik han tildelt fuld pension for gifte.
According to the Dutch legislation on old-age pensions, any married man or woman was entitled on reaching the age of 65 to an old-age pension.
Da hans yngre hustru fortsat oppebar en ydelse på grund af uarbejdsdygtighed,
A person receiving an old-age pension whose dependent spouse had not yet reached that age was entitled to a supplement which varied in amount according to the
­ 11 ­ nedsatte Sociale Verzekeringsbank det tillæg, Molenbroek havde ret til, med et beløb svarende til den indtægt, hans hustru modtog.
- 11 spouse's own income, certain proportions of which were deducted from the supplement.
Molenbroek indbragte denne afgørelse for Raad van Beroep, idet han gjorde gældende, at betingelsen for at få tildelt fuldt pensionstillæg indebærer en ubegrundet indirekte forskelsbehandling på grundlag af køn, idet det hovedsagelig er mænd, der opfylder betingelsen.
When he reached the age of 65 Mr Molenbroek was granted a full married man's pension. The SVB took account of the fact that his spouse, who was younger, continued to receive an incapacity allowance and deducted that income from the supplement to which Mr Molenbroek was entitled.
Følgelig måtte betingelsen være i strid med artikel 4, stk. 1, i direktiv 79/7.
Mr Molenbroek appealed against the SVB's decision concerning the supplement to the Raad van Beroep, claiming in particular that the condition attached to entitlement to the full supplement was the source of unjustified indirect discrimination on the grounds of sex, since the majority of those satisfying the condition would be men, and consequently it was incompatible with Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7.
"Artikel 4, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF af 19. december 1978 om gradvis gennemførelse af princippet om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder med hensynet til social sikring skal fortolkes således, at bestemmelsen ikke er til hinder for at anvende en national lovbestemmelse om alderspensionsforsikring, som ­ uanset køn ­udelukkende lader tildelingen og størrelsen af et tillæg til en pensionsberettiget, hvis ægtefælle, der forsørges, endnu ikke har nået pensionsalderen, afhænge af ægtefællens indtægter fra eller i forbindelse med erhvervsarbejde, også selv om bestemmelsen har til følge, at betydeligt flere mænd end kvinder kan opnå et tillæg."
"Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the application of national legislation on old-age insurance which, without distinction of sex, makes the grant and amount of an allowance payable to recipients of a pension whose dependent spouse has not yet reached retirement age dependent on the income received by such spouse from or in relation to an occupation, even though the result of the legislation is that a larger number of men than women receive the allowance."
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 17. september 1992.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 17 September 1992.
Retten
He concluded:
Sag T­16/91: Rendo m.fl. mod Kommissionen 18.11.1992 "Konkurrence ­ aftale der hindrer indførsel og udførsel af elektricitet til og fra Nederlandene ­ delvis undladelse af at træffe afgørelse om aftalens forenelighed med Traktatens artikel 85, stk. ΓII II
"Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC must be interpreted as not precluding the application of national social security legislation which makes the award of a supplement, and the amount thereof, to an old-age pensioner with a dependent spouse under the age of 65, for whom that supplement is in fact intended, depend on whether that spouse receives any income from work, even if the consequence of such legislation is that most of those who qualify for the supplement are men. "
I henhold til aftalens artikel 21 forbeholdes det SEP at indføre og udføre elektricitet, og det pålægges deltagerne - i de leveringsaftaler, som de indgår med eldistributionsvirksomhederne - at betinge sig, at disse afholder sig fra indførsel og udførsel af elektricitet.
Article 21 of that agreement reserved the importation and exportation of electricity to SEP alone and required its participants to stipulate in supply contracts which they concluded with undertakings distributing electricity that the latter would refrain from engaging in importing or exporting electricity.
Det var denne bestemmelse, der var genstand for den i sagen anfægtede beslutning.
It was that provision which was the subject of the decision contested in these proceedings.
Sagsøgerne nedlagde for Retten navnlig påstand om annullation af den nævnte beslutning, men kun for så vidt som Kommissionen ikke havde udtalt sig om anvendelsen af samarbejdsaftalens artikel 21 på de indførsler og udførsler, som distributionsselskaberne, heriblandt sagsøgerne, foretager inden for rammerne af offentlig el-forsyning.
In particular, the applicants requested the Court of First Instance to annul the said decision only to the extent that the Commission had not given its view on the application of Article 21 of the OVS to imports and exports carried out by the distribution companies, including the applicants, in the area of public supply.
Sagsøgerne anførte bl.a., at Kommissionen var forpligtet til at konstatere, at de indførselsrestriktioner, der fulgte af samarbejdsaftalen, var i strid med traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, og til at træffe beslutning om at forbyde dem.
In particular, the applicants maintained that the Commission was obliged to find that the restrictions on importation arising from the OVS cooperation agreement constituted a breach of Article 85(1) of the Treaty and to take a decision prohibiting them.
I denne forbindelse havde Kommissionen tilkendegivet, at den ikke agtede at følge den i forordning nr. 17 fastsatte fremgangsmåde med hensyn til forbudet mod at indføre elektricitet inden for rammerne af offentlig el-forsyning, i det omfang forbuddet var omfattet af den nye nederlandske lov om elektricitetsforsyning af 8. december 1989, men at den havde til hensigt at foretage undersøgelsen af loven under en procedure, som ville blive indledt mod Kongeriget Nederlandene i henhold til Traktatens artikel 169.
In that regard, the Commission had made clear its intention not to continue with the procedure commenced under Regulation No 17 as regards the prohibition on importing electricity in the area of public supply, in so far as that prohibition was covered by the new Dutch Law on electricity of 8 December 1989, and to defer examination of it to proceedings to be brought against the Kingdom of the Netherlands under Article 169 of the Treaty.
Retten konstaterede, at undersøgelsen af den nationale lovs forenelighed med fællesskabsretten måtte have forrang for en stillingtagen til samarbejdsaftalen.
The Court of First Instance found that examination of the compatibility of the national Law with Community law took priority over examination of the OVS.
Så længe det ikke var fastslået, at loven var uforenelig med Traktaten, kunne en konstatering af, at samarbejdsaftalen var i strid med EF-retten, kun have praktiske virkninger i det omfang, de restriktioner, som fulgte af aftalen, var mere vidtgående end dem, der fulgte af loven. ven.
As long as the incompatibility of that Law with the Treaty had not been established, the finding that the OVS was unlawful could not have any practical effects except in so far as the restrictions which it laid down exceeded those arising from the Law.
Dette var navnlig en konsekvens af, at Kommissionen ikke - for at bringe en tilsidesættelse af artikel 85 til ophør - kan pålægge virksomheder at handle i strid med en national lov, uden at den samtidig foretager en fælles skabsretlig vurdering af loven. Den rette procedure, som står til Kommissionens rådighed ved behandlingen af et spørgsmål som dette, er imidlertid den, der indledes i henhold til Traktatens artikel 169, som i det foreliggende tilfælde måtte have forrang for proceduren i henhold til artikel 3 i forordning nr. 17.
That followed, in particular, from the fact that the Commission could not compel undertakings to act in a manner which was contrary to a national Law for the purpose of terminating a breach of Article 85, without assessing the national Law in the light of Community law.
Sag T-80/91: Campogrande mod Kommissionen
Case T-80/91: Campogrande ν Commission Staff case
Sag C-243/89: Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Danmark
Case C-243/89: Commission ν Kingdom of Denmark
"Traktatbrud - EØF-Traktatens artikel 30, 48 og 59 - direktiv 71/305/EØF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne med hensyn til indgåelse af offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter - udbud vedrørende bygning af en bro over Storebælts Vesterrende."
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Articles 30, 48 and 59 of the EEC Treaty - Directive 71/305/EEC concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts - Tender procedures for the "Great Belt Western Bridge".
Generaladvokat Gui seppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 17. november 1992.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 17 November 1992.
"At Domstolen giver Kommissionen medhold, og at Kongeriget Danmark tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger."
"Uphold the application and order the defendant to pay the costs."
Sag C-106/90: Emerald Meats mod Kommissionen
Case C-106/90: Emerald Meats ν Commission
Annullationen af Kommissionens afgørelse i henhold til artikel 6, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 4024/89 om fastsættelse af gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til den importordning, der er fastsat ved forordning (EØF) nr. 3889/89 af frosset kød af hornkvæg henhørende under KN-kode 0202 og for varer henhørende under KN-kode 0206 2991 - delvis annui lati on af forordning (EØF) nr. 3337/90 om fastsættelse af, i hvilken udstrækning søgninger om importlicenser, indgivet i henhold til nævnte forordning kan imødekommes -ansvar uden for kontraktforhold som følge af ukorrekt administration af toldkontingentet.
Annulment of the Commission Decision pursuant to Article 6(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4024/89 laying down detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3889/89 for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 - Partial annulment of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 337/90 determining the extent to which applications in the beef and veal sector for the issue of import licences lodged pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 4024/89 may be accepted - Non-contractual liability arising from failure to administer and manage the tariff quota correctly.
Sag C-129/91: Emerald Meats mod Kommissionen
Case C-129/91: Emerald Meats ν Commission
Annullation af Kommissionens afgørelse i henhold til artikel 6, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 3885/90 om fastsættelse af gennemførelsesbestemmelserne til den importordning, der er fastsat for frosset kød af hornkvæg henhørende under KN-kode 0202 og for varer henhørende under kode KN-kode 0206 2991 - delvis annullation af forordning (EØF) 519/91 om fastsættelse af, i hvilken udstrækning ansøgninger om importlicenser for oksekød i henhold til den nævnte forordning, kan imødekommes - erstatningskrav.
Annulment of the Commission's decision pursuant to Article 6(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3885/90 laying down detailed rules for the application of the import arrangement provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3838/90 for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 - Partial annulment of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 519/91 determining the extent to which applications in the beef and veal sector for the issue of import licences lodged pursuant to the said regulation may be accepted - Application for damages.
Generaladvokat Claus Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i C-106/90. C- 317/90 og C-129/91 i retsmødet den 18. november 1992.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion in Cases C-106/90, C-317/90 and C-129/91 at the sitting of the Court on 18 November 1992.
Han foreslog Domstolen afgøre de tre sager ved at:
He proposed that in the three cases the Court should:
"Traktatens bestemmelser om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser og frie kapitalbevægelser, navnlig artikel 59 og 67, der skal fortolkes
Interpretation of Article 67 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 88/361/EEC for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty and Article 59 of the EEC Treaty - National legislation restricting the possibility of authorized broadcasting organizations participating in the capital of foreign stations or cooperating in setting up or operating such stations - National
- 15 - således, at de ikke er til hinder for en lovgivning i en medlemsstat, der forbyder en radiospredningsorganisation, hjemmehørende i denne stat, at eje en del af kapitalgrundlaget i en kommerciel radiospredningsvirksomhed, der er etableret eller oprettet i en anden medlemsstat, at stille kaution for en sådan radiostation og at yde rådgivende virksomhed af kommerciel eller juridisk karakter, alene med henblik med oprettelsen af den nævnte kommercielle station, når de pågældende ydelser drejer sig om oprettelsen af en kommerciel fjernsynsstation navnlig med henblik på at sende til den første medlemsstats område dog på betingelse af, at det pågældende forbud er nødvendigt for at sikre ordningens alsidige og ikke-kommercielle karakter, og ikke går videre end nødvendigt i forhold til dette mål."
- 15 policy measures seeking to retain a pluralist and non-commercial broadcasting system.
De forenede sager C-267/91 og C-268/91: Straffesager mod Keck og Mithouard
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 18 November 1992.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare spørgsmålene således:
His alternative conclusion was as follows:
"Et forbud i lovgivningen mod salg med tab, som på grund af dets generelle udformning også angår situationer, der ikke henhører under anvendelsesområdet for en (eller flere) af de præceptive krav i fællesskabsretten, er ikke forenelig med EØF-Traktatens artikel 30."
"The provisions of the Treaty on the freedom to provide services and on the free movement of capital, in particular, Articles 59 and 67, must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude a Member State from enacting rules prohibiting a broadcasting organization established in that State from participating in the capital of a commercial broadcasting company, established or to be set up in another Member State, from providing guarantees in favour of that station, and from providing commercial or legal advice, for the purposes of setting up the said commercial station, when such a range of activities is directed towards setting up a commercial television station aimed, in particular, at the first State's territory, provided that the prohibition in question is necessary to ensure that the system remains pluralist and non-commercial, and provided that the rules are proportional to that objective."
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 90/413/Euratom vedrørende en procedure om anvendelse af Euratomtraktatens artikel 83, stk. 1, litra c) -virksomhed stillet under administration.
Interpretation of Articles 3 and 7 of the EEC Treaty and the principles of the free movement of persons, services and capital, free competition in the common market, and non-discrimination on grounds of nationality - National legislation prohibiting only resellers, but not manufacturers, from selling at a loss.
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet i Sjette Afdeling den 19. november 1992.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 18 November 1992.
Udgivet af informationstjenesten ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol L-2025 Luxembourg.
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 19 November 1992.
Sag C-237/90
JUDGMENTS
Sag C-337/89 Kommissionen mod Det Forenede Kongerige Miljø og forbrugere Sag C-376/90 Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Belgien
Case C-237/90 Commission ν Federal Republic of Germany Environment and consumers Case C-286/90 Anklagemyndigheden (Public Prosecutor) ν P.M. Poulsen and Diva Navigation Agriculture Joined Cases C-15/91 and C-108/91 J. Buckl & Söhne and Others ν Commission Agriculture Case C-337/89 Commission ν United Kingdom Environment and consumers Case C-376/90Commission ν Kingdom of Belgium EAEC II.
Sag C-211/91 Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Belgien Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro
Case C-211/91 Commission ν Kingdom of Belgium Opinion of Mr Advocate General Giuseppe Tesauro
Sag C-189/91 P. Kirsammer-Hack mod Nurhan Sisal Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat Marco Darmon
Case C-189/91 P. Kirsammer-Hack ν Nurhan Sidal