natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—manglendeefterkommelse af artikel 7 i Rådets direktiv 76/464/EØF af 4. maj 1976 om forurening, der er forårsaget af udledning af visse farlige stoffer i Fællesskabets vandmiljø — programmer med henblik på at formindske forureningen med stoffer, som er opført på liste II, der er optaget som bilag til direktivet, er ikke blevet fastlagt
The Court considers that in this case the conditions of competition existing on the market in sound and pictures must be considered in relation to betting outlets.
Præjudiciel — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 132, stk. 3, og artikel 227 - fortolkning af artikel 7, stk. 1, litra a), i Rådets direktiv 77/388/EØF af 17. maj 1977 om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter - Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag - indførsel af et gode, som ikke opfylder betingelserne i EF-traktatens artikel 8 og 10 - indførsel til Nederlandene af et skib, som befinder sig i fri omsætning i De Nederlandske Antiller
In those circumstances, the applicant's assertion that bettors on French races are not content with pictures of other races is likewise insufficient to establish that, in this case, the definition of the product market must be limited to the sound and pictures of French races, to the exclusion, in particular, of the sound and pictures of British races, which are at present available in Belgium.
Præjudiciel - Employment Appeal Tribunal — fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 76/207/EØF om gennemførelse af princippet om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder for så vidt angår adgang til beskæftigelse, erhvervsuddannelse, forfremmelse samt arbejdsvilkår — sag anlagt af en kvindelig arbejdstager mod hendes arbejdsgiver i anledning af forskelsbehandling på grundlag af køn — forlig — arbejdsgiverens manglende imødekommelse herefter af en anmodning fra arbejdstageren om en anbefaling
Contrary to what the applicant claims, the market in sound and pictures does not constitute an independent market, but instead an ancillary market created as a result of the main betting market, whose operation tends to influence and direct bettors' choices towards betting on the races transmitted, the bettors being the ultimate consumers both on the main betting market and on the ancillary market in sound and pictures.
Præjudiciel — Tribunale di Brescia — tilbagebetaling af afgifter betalt i strid med Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969 om kapitaltilførselsafgifter — årligt registreringsgebyr for kapitalselskaber - national bestemmelse, som fastsætter en søgsmålsfrist, der begynder at løbe fra datoen for gebyrets betaling og ikke fra datoen for den korrekte gennemførelse i national ret af direktivet
In view of that information provided by the applicant itself, it must be concluded that the non-transmission of sound and pictures of French races and the transmission of the sound and pictures of British races have not prevented and still do not prevent Belgian bettors from continuing to bet on French races.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Kommissionens direktiv 93/71/EØF om ændring af Rådets
Consequently, the applicant cannot claim that demand on the market in sound and pictures and the consequent choice by bookmakers between sound and pictures of different origins are based solely on bettors' wish to see only races on which they have bet and that, therefore, the sound and
direktiv 91/414/EØF om markedsføring af plantebeskyttelsesmidler på grund af aftalens betydelige budgetmæssige virkninger
However, for the reasons already given, the relevant market, namely the Belgian market in sound and pictures, is a national one.
Præjudiciel — Bundesgerichtshof— fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 85 og artikel 90, stk. 2, i relation til en situation, hvor en kommune giver en enkelt virksomhed (formelt uafhængig, men med kommunen som eneste selskabsdeltager) eneret til at benytte det kommunale vejnet ved distributionen af naturgas til industrielle og private forbrugere
Furthermore, since, on the basis of its structure, which is determined according to criteria relating to the conditions of competition and, in particular, the pattern of demand on the market in the sound and pictures of races in general, the geographical market is divided into distinct national markets, there is no basis for the applicant's allegation that there is a partitioning of the common market resulting from the licensing policy of the sociétés de courses.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—manglende gennemførelse inden for de fastsatte frister af de nødvendige foranstaltninger til at gennemføre Kommissionens direktiv 93/72/EØF af 1. september 1993 og Kommissionens direktiv 93/101/EØF af 11. november 1993 om henholdsvis nittende og tyvende tilpasning til den tekniske udvikling af direktiv 67/548/EØF om tilnærmelse af lovgivning om klassificering, emballering og etikettering af farlige stoffer
Accordingly, the conditions in which the main betting market operates are characterized by close geographical links between bettors and betting outlets, in so far as the mobility of bettors is necessarily limited and marginal, as is evidenced by the information produced by the interveners and not challenged by the applicant, relating to the cross-frontier betting market between Belgium and France.
Sag C-188/97 Ρ Lars Bo Rasmussen / Kommissionen
Since the geographical scope of the main betting market remains national, this must also be true of the geographical scope of the ancillary market in sound and pictures.
Appel til prøvelse af Rettens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 18. marts 1997 i sag T-35/96, Lars Bo Rasmussen mod Kommissionen — opretholdelse af påstandene om annullation af Kommissionens afgørelse om at annullere proceduren vedrørende meddelelse om ledig stilling KOM/116/94, om at annullere Kommissionens afgørelse, hvorefter den i meddelelsen omhandlede stilling er forbeholdt en statsborger fra en af de nye medlemsstater, og afgørelsen om at offentliggøre en meddelelse om generel udvælgelsesprøve KOM/A/929 (chef for enheden V/F/3) samt om, at Kommissionen tilpligtes at betale en godtgørelse for den lidte ikke økonomiske skade
As regards, finally, the allegedly arbitrary nature of the refusal of the sociétés de courses to supply French sound and pictures to the applicant, the Court considers that, since the markets are on a national scale, the arbitrariness or otherwise of the refusal by the sociétés de courses to exploit their intellectual property rights in Belgium cannot be assessed in the light of the policy followed by the sociétés de courses on other, geographically distinct markets. The fact that the applicant is prepared, as it states, to pay an appropriate fee for a licence to transmit French races does not constitute sufficient evidence of an abuse in the absence of discrimination against it by the sociétés de courses in the relevant geographical market.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — Rådets direktiv 82/501/EØF af 24. juni 1982 om risikoen for større uheld i forbindelse med en række industrielle aktiviteter ikke gennemført fuldstændig og korrekt i national ret
If the refusal to supply the applicant with French sound and pictures in Belgium does not constitute an abuse because, as the Court has just found, it involves no discrimination as between operators on the Belgian market, that refusal likewise cannot be held to be an abuse merely because outlets operating on the German market have French sound and pictures available to them.
Præj udidei—Tribunal administratif, Luxembourg - fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 52 samt af artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv (EØF) 64/427 af 7. juli 1964 om de nærmere overgangsforanstaltninger
The applicant's argument that the sociétés de courses abused their joint dominant position is based on a definition of the geographical market
nitrater, der stammer fra landbruget
The complaint alleging an inadequate statement of reasons for the measure
Appel til prøvelse af Rettens kendelse (Tredje Afdeling) af 19. februar 1997 om afvisning af sag T-117/96, Intertronic F. Cornells mod Kommissionen - formaliteten i et passivitetssøgsmål, der formelt er anlagt under henvisning til artikel 3 i forordning nr. 17/62, men hvis egentlige formål er at opnå en efterprøvelse af lovligheden af en beslutning om ikke at iværksætte en traktatbrudsprocedure i medfør af EF-traktatens artikel 169
In this case, by taking the view in the contested decision that the prohibition of retransmission imposed on DSV by the sociétés de courses does not, under Community law as it now stands, fall within the scope of Article 85(1) of the Treaty, but forms part of the rights vested in the licensor, the Commission gave the applicant sufficient information in order to enable it to ascertain the principal matters of fact and of law on which the reasoning of the contested dedsion was based.
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — Den Italienske Republik har ikke inden for den fastsatte frist vedtaget eller underrettet Kommissionen om bestemmelser til gennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 91/676/EØF af 12. december 1991 om beskyttelse afvand mod forurening forårsaget af
First, it is conceivable that some aspects of the manner in which an intellectual property right is exercised may prove to be incompatible with Article 85 of the Treaty where they serve to give effect to an agreement which may have as its
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
In this case, the applicant has produced no evidence to show that the contract concluded between PMU/PMI and DSV in fact served to give effect to an agreement prohibited by Article 85(1) of the Treaty.
Donatene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
In those circumstances, it cannot be concluded that the Commission erred in considering that Article 85(1) was inapplicable.
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
The direct refusal to grant a transmission licence
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 13.6.1997 Katalognr.: DX-AC-97-0I7-DA-C
Moreover, the effect of such an agreement might be to 'limit or control ... markets' and/or to 'share markets' within the meaning of Article 85(l)(b) and (c) of the Treaty.
Ugen 16. - 20. juni 1997
16 to 20 June 1997 n° 18/97
INDHOLD side side
Case C-105/96
Sag T-260/94 Air Inter SA / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Transport
Commission of the European Communities ν Kingdom of Spain
NYE SAGER
Court bf Justice
17. juni 1997 ret til indrejse — retsmidler — artikel 8 og 9 i
Right of entry — Legal remedies —Articles 8 and
Præjudiciel »Fri bevægelighed for personer — undtagelser direktiv 64/221¡EØF* (Domstolens plenum) hvorved lovligheden af offentlige myndigheders afgørelser kan prøves af de almindelige domstole.
Preliminary ruling (Free movement of persons — Derogations 9 of Directive 641221 ¡EEC) (Full Court) refusing him entry indicated, first, that the Secretary of State had personally decided that it would be contrary to the interests of public policy and public security to allow Mr Shingara to enter the United Kingdom, and, secondly, that he was not entitled to appeal against the refusal of leave to enter.
Ved kendelser af 3. februar 1995 indgået til Domstolen den 13. marts (sag C-65/95) og den 3. april 1995 (sag C-lll/95) har High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, forelagt fem præjudiciellespørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 8 og 9 i Rådets direktiv 64/221/EØF af 25. februar 1964 (herefter »direktivet«).
By orders of 3 February 1995, received at the Court on 13 March (C-65/95) and 3 April (C111/95) 1995, the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling five questions on the interpretation of Articles 8 and 9 of Council Directive 64/221/EEC of 25 February 1964 (hereinafter 'the directive').
Mann Singh Shingara, som er fransk statsborger, forsøgte den 29. marts 1991 at indrejse i Det Forenede Kongerige, men blev nægtet indrejsetilladelse.
Some years later, on 15 July 1993, Mr Shingara arrived at the Port of Dover and was admitted to the United Kingdom after showing his French identity card.
I meddelelsen herom hed det dels, at indenrigsministeren personligt havde truffet afgørelse om, at det var i strid med den offentlige orden og sikkerhed at give Shingara tilladelse til indrejse i Det Forenede Kongerige, dels at han ikke kunne klage over (»appeal«) den britiske myndigheds nægtelse af indrejsetilladelse.
On 22 July 1993 he was arrested in Birmingham and detained as an illegal entrant. On 30 July 1993 he was granted leave to apply for judicial review of his detention and on the same day was released and returned to France.
For den forelæggende ret har sagsøgerne i hovedsagen, som er blevet nægtet indrejse i Det Forenede Kongerige, navnlig nedlagt påstand om, at det fastslås, at de i medfør af direktivets artikel 8 havde ret til at påklage de afgørelser, Indenrigsministeriet havde truffet over for dem under henvisning til hensynet til den offentlige orden, eller til at opnå en undersøgelse af deres forhold foretaget af en uafhængig myndighed i medfør af direktivets artikel 9.
Before the national court the applicants in the main action, who have been refused entry into the United Kingdom, are seeking in particular a declaration that they are entitled to an appeal under Article 8 of the directive against the decisions adopted with regard to them by the Home Secretary for reasons of public policy, or to an examination of their situation by an independent authority in accordance with Article 9 of the directive.
Den administrative rekurs, der er hjemmel for, må i Det Forenede Kongerige holdes ude fra en begæring om domstolsprøvelse (»application for judicial review«, herefter »domstolsprøvelse«),
On 9 March 1989 Mr Radiom, who had worked in the United Kingdom for the Iranian consular service since 1983, was informed by the Home Office that following the severance of diplomatic relations between the United Kingdom and the Islamic Republic of Iran he would be detained and deported if he did not leave the United
Nogle år senere, den 15. juli 1993, ankom Shingara til Dover havn og fik lov til at rejse ind i landet efter at have fremvist sit franske identitetskort. Den 22. juli 1993 blev han anholdt i Birmingham og tilbageholdt, fordi han var ulovligt indrejst i landet.
Those administrative remedies must be distinguished, in the United Kingdom, from applications for judicial review, whereby the legality of decisions of public authorities is subject to review by tue ordinary courts.
Den 30. juli 1993 fik Shingara tilladelse til at indgive begæring om domstolsprøvelse med henblik på at anfægte
Mr Shingara, who is of French nationality, attempted to visit the United Kingdom on 29 March 1991 but was refused entry.
Indledningsvis bemærkes, at direktivets artikel 8 ikke indeholder nærmere bestemmelser om klagerettens gennemførelse, herunder spørgsmålet om, hvilken type retsinstans afgørelsen skal kunne påklages til, idet dette afhænger af domstolenes organisation i den enkelte medlemsstat.
imposed by Article 8, organize, for persons covered by the directive, legal remedies governed by special procedures affording lesser safeguards than those pertaining to remedies available to nationals in respect of acts of the administration.
Anmodningen blev afslået ved skrivelse af 23. november 1992, hvori der blev gjort opmærksom på, at skønt Radiom var statsborger i en medlemsstat, var han ikke klageberettiget.
The application was refused by letter of 23 November 1992, in which it was stated that notwithstanding the fact that he was a Community national, he had no right of appeal.
Det fremgår af forelæggelseskendelsen, at indenrigsministeren personligt på baggrund af anmodningen om domstolsprøvelse havde overvejet at trække beslutningen om at nægte Radiom indrejse i Det Forenede Kongerige tilbage.
As regards the main proceedings here, the national legislation provides for remedies in respect of acts of the administration generally and another kind of remedy in respect of decisions concerning entry of nationals of the Member State concerned.
Ministeren fandt imidlertid, at det ville stride mod hensynet til statens sikkerhed at trække beslutningen tilbage.
In addition, the order for reference states that the latter remedy is also available to non-nationals regarding entry, with the exception, however, of refusals of entry on grounds of the public good.
Det fremgår endvidere af forelæggelseskendelsen, at det sidstnævnte retsmiddel også kan anvendes af udlændinge i spørgsmål om indrejse, dog med undtagelse af nægtelse af indrejse begrundet i offentlighedens interesse.
The order indicates that the Secretary of State personally considered, in the light of the application for judicial review, the withdrawal of the exclusion order, but concluded that it would not be in the interests of national security for the order to be withdrawn.
Radiom indgav derefter en begæring om domstolsprøvelse til High Court med henblik på ophævelse af afgørelsen af 23. november 1992 om ikke at imødekomme hans anmodning om opholdstilladelse.
Mr Radiom made an application to the High Court for judicial review of the decision of 23 November 1992 rejecting his application for a residence permit.
Det første og andet spørgsmål
First and second questions
Undtagelsesbestemmelserne i EF-traktatens artikel 48 og 56 giver medlemsstaterne beføjelse til, når de grunde, som er nævnt i bestemmelserne, foreligger, at træffe visse foranstaltninger over for statsborgere fra andre medlemsstater, navnlig foranstaltninger, som er begrundet i hensynet til den offentlige orden. Medlemsstaterne kan ikke bringe tilsvarende foranstaltninger i anvendelse over for deres egne statsborgere, idet staten ikke kan udvise sine egne borgere fra sit område eller forbyde dem indrejse.
The reservations contained in Articles 48 and 56 of the EC Treaty permit Member States to adopt, with respect to the nationals of other Member States and on the grounds specified in those provisions, in particular grounds justified by the requirements of public policy, measures which they cannot apply to their own nationals, inasmuch as they have no authority to expel the latter from the national territory or to deny them access thereto.
Heraf følger, at den klageadgang, statsborgere fra de andre medlemsstater har i de situationer, der er omhandlet i direktivet, ikke kan bedømmes ud
It follows that the remedies available to nationals of other Member States in the circumstances defined by the directive cannot be assessed by reference to the remedies available to nationals concerning the right of entry.
Med den første del af det første spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret reelt oplyst, om direktivets artikel 8 skal fortolkes således, at den forpligtelse, der er pålagt en medlemsstat ved denne bestemmelse, er opfyldt i tilfælde hvor der efter medlemsstatens lovgivning dels findes et retsmiddel mod administrative afgørelser i almindelighed, dels findes en anden type retsmiddel mod afgørelser om indrejse, der træffes over for indlændinge i medlemsstaten, såfremt statsborgere i andre medlemsstater kan
The first part of the first question asks in substance whether, on a proper construction of Article 8 of the directive, where under the national legislation of a Member State (i) remedies are available in respect of acts of the administration generally and (ii) different remedies are available in respect of decisions concerning entry by nationals of the State concerned, the obligation imposed on the Member State by that provision is satisfied if nationals of other Member States enjoy the same remedies as those available against acts of the administration generally in that Member State.
fra det retsmiddel, der kan anvendes af indlændinge med hensyn til deres ret til indrejse.
The Court notes that Article 8 does not govern the ways in which remedies are to be made available, for instance by stipulating the courts from which such remedies may be sought, such details being dependent upon the organization of the courts in each Member State.
Disse to situationer er på ingen måde sammenlignelige. Mens retten til indrejse for indlændinge er en følge af deres egenskab af statsborgere og derfor gennemføres, uden at staten har et skøn, kan de særlige omstændigheder, der kan berettige anvendelsen over for statsborgere i andre medlemsstater af begrebet den offentlige orden, være forskellige fra land til land og fra periode til periode, og der må derfor i så henseende indrømmes de nationale kompetente myndigheder et skøn.
The two situations are indeed in no way comparable: whereas in the case of nationals the right of entry is a consequence of the status of national, so that there can be no margin of discretion for the State as regards the exercise of that right, the special circumstances which may justify reliance on the concept of public policy as against nationals of other Member States may vary over time and from one country to another, and it is therefore necessary to allow the competent national authorities a margin of discretion.
En sådan fortolkning ville være i modstrid med bestemmelsernes formål, idet den fremgangsmåde, der er foreskrevet i artikel 9 — for så vidt angår prøvelsen af sagen og den udtalelse, der skal afgives — skal afbøde utilstrækkelighederne ved de retsmidler, der er omhandlet i direktivets artikel 8.
However, the obligation to grant the person concerned the same legal remedies in respect of any decision concerning entry, or refusing the issue or renewal of a residence permit, or ordering expulsion from the territory as are available to nationals in respect of acts of the administration, means that a Member State cannot, without being in breach of the obligation
Når henses til denne besvarelse, er det ikke nødvendigt at besvare den anden del af det første spørgsmål og det andet spørgsmål.
deficiencies in the remedies referred to in Article 8 of the directive.
Det tredje spørgsmål
Fourth and fifth questions
Med det fjerde og det femte spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret reelt oplyst, om en statsborger i en medlemsstat, over for hvem der er truffet en beslutning, hvorved der gives ham forbud mod indrejse i en anden medlemsstat af hensyn til den offentlige orden eller sikkerhed, har klageadgang for så vidt angår senere trufne foranstaltninger, som forhindrer hans indrejse i denne stat, selv om den første beslutning ikke er påklaget eller har været genstand for en udtalelse.
The third question asks whether, on a proper construction of Article 9 of the directive, the three hypotheses mentioned in Article 9(1) (namely "where there is no right of appeal to a court of law, or where such appeal may be only in respect of the legal validity of the decision, or where the appeal cannot have suspensory effect') apply equally as regards Article 9(2), that is to say, where the decision challenged is a refusal to issue a first residence permit or a decision ordering expulsion before the issue of such a permit.
Med det tredje spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret oplyst, om direktivets artikel 9 skal fortolkes således, at de tre tilfælde, der er nævnt i bestemmelsens stk. 1, og som er udtrykt med ordene »hvis der ingen retsmidler findes, eller hvis retsmidlerne kun tager sigte på spørgsmålet om beslutningens lovlighed, eller ikke har opsættende virkning«, også gælder i forbindelse med stk. 2, dvs. når den anfægtede beslutning er en beslutning om nægtelse af udstedelse af den første opholdstilladelse eller en beslutning om udvisning før udstedelse af en sådan tilladelse.
The fourth and fifth questions ask in substance whether a national of a Member State who has been refused entry into another Member State for reasons of public order or public security has a right of appeal in respect of measures adopted subsequently which prevent his entering that State, even if the first decision has not been the subject of an appeal or an opinion.