natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ved stævning, indgivet den 19. juni 1990, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det blev fastslået, at Kongeriget Spanien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Traktaten, idet det ikke har opstillet og/eller meddelt Kommissionen programmer for at mindske vægt og/eller omfang af emballage til flydende levnedsmidler i husholdningsaffald, der skal bortskaffes endeligt, jf. artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 85/339/EØF af 27. juni 1985 (EFT L 176, s. 18).
By application lodged on 22 January 1991, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that by not implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 May 1988, the Kingdom of Belgium had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty.
Det hedder i domsklusionen:
The Court held:
Kongeriget Spanien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Traktaten, idet det ikke har opstillet programmer for at mindske vægt og/eller omfang af emballage til flydende levnedsmidler i husholdningsaffald, der skal bortskaffes endeligt, jf. artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 85/339/EØF af 27. juni 1985.
By not adopting the measures needed to implement the judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 May 1988 the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty.
Kongeriget Spanien betaler sagens omkostninger."
The Kingdom of Belgium is ordered to pay the costs".
Generaladvokat Carl Otto Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 7. november 1991.
Mr Advocate General C Gul mann delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 5 November 1991
"Jeg skal derfor foreslå, at der gives Kommissionen medhold, og det således fastslås, at Kongeriget Spanien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i honholo til EØF-Traktaten, idet det ikke har opstillet programmer for at mindske vægt og/eller omfang af emballage til flydende levnedsmidler i husholdningsaffald, der skal bortskaffes endeligt, jf. artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 85/339/EØF. Desuden bør sagsøgte betale sagens omkostninger."
"It therefore only remains for me to propose that the Court should declare that by failing to implement the judgment of the Court of 24 May 1988 in Case 307/86, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty and order the defendant to pay the costs".
Sag C-19/91: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Kongeriget Belgien
Case C-33/90: Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic - 13 December 1991 (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives - Waste -Toxic and dangerous waste - Obligation to transmit information to the Commission - Failure to do so) (Full Court)
10.12.1991 "Traktatbrud - manglende opfyldelse af dom afsagt af Domstolen" (Domstolens plenum)
39), Council Directive 78/319/EEC of 20 March 1978 (OJ L 84, p. 43) and Article 5 of the EEC Treaty.
Ved stævning, indgivet den 22. januar 1991, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det blev fastslået, at Kongeriget Belgien havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 171, idet det ikke havde truffet foranstaltninger med henblik på at opfylde Domstolens dom af 24. maj 1988 (sag 307/86, Kommissionen mod Belgien, Sml. s. 2677).
By failing to reply to the questions put by the Commission in its letter of 29 June 1987 the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 5 of the EEC Treaty;
Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 171, idet det ikke har truffet foranstaltninger med henblik på at opfylde Domstolens dom af 24. maj 1988.
Since the Region of Campania has not drawn up plans relating In particular to the types and quantities of waste to be disposed of, general technical provisions, appropriate sites for the disposal and all the special provisions relating to particular waste or drawn up or maintained plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste and Article 12(1) of Council Directive 78/319/EEC of 20 March 1978 on toxic and dangerous waste;
Kongeriget Belgien betaler sagens omkostninger."
The Italian Republic Is ordered to pay the costs".
Generaladvokat Claus Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 5. november 1991.
Mr Advocate General M. Dartnon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 5 November 1991.
Sag C-33/90: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Italienske Republik
"I therefore propose that the Court should rule that:
Ved stævning, indgivet den 31. januar 1990, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det blev fastslået, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat visse af sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 75/442/EØF af 15. juli 1975 (EFT L 194, s. 39), Rådets direktiv 78/319/EØF af 20. marts 1978 (EFT L 84, s. 43), samt til EØF-Traktatens artikel 5.
By failing to ensure the Implementation in the region of Campania of the plans for waste disposal referred to in Article 6 of Directive 75/442/EEC and Article 12(1) of Directive 78/319/EEC, Italy has failed to fulfil Its obligations under those two directives;
Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 5, stk. 1, idet den ikke har svaret på spørgsmålene i Kommissionens skrivelse af 29. juni 1987.
By refusing to reply to the three questions contained in the letter of 29 June 1987 and repeated in the letter of formal notice of 20 June 1988, the defendant State has failed to fulfil Its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 5 of the EEC Treaty, and order the Italian Republic to pay the costs".
Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 6 i Rådets direktiv 75/442/EØF af 15. juli 1975 om affald og til artikel 12, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 78/319/EØF af 20. marts 1978 om giftigt og farligt affald, idet der for regionen Campania hverken er udarbejdet planer, som navnlig skulle omfatte arten og mængden af det affald, der skal bortskaffes, de almindelige tekniske forskrifter, områder, der er egnede for bortskaffelsen og alle
By application lodged on 16 March 1990, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that by falling to communicate the laws, regulations and administrative provisions by which it claimed to have fulfilled its obligations under Council Directive 87/53/EEC of 15 December 1986 (OJ 1987, L 24, p. 33) or by falling to adopt the measures needed to comply therewith, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and the EEC Treaty.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 5. november 1991.
(b) by failing to inform the Commission of the implementation of the other provisions inserted in Directive 83/643 by Directive 87/53.
Hans forslag lød således:
Republic is ordered to pay the costs".
"Jeg skal herefter foreslå, at det fastslås:
Mr Advocate General W. Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 19 September 1991.
at Italien ikke har sikret sig, at der for regionen Campania er udarbejdet planer og programmer for bortskaffelse af affald, således som fastsat i artikel 6 i direktiv 75/442/EØF og artikel 12, stk. 1, i direktiv 78/318/EØF, og således tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til de nævnte direktiver;
"Having regard to the foregoing considerations I conclude that the Court should grant the Commission's application in its entirety, except with regard to the new second indent of Article 5(1)(a) and Article 8(2) of Directive 83/643/EEC, and order the Italian Government to pay the costs".
at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 5, stk. 1, idet den ikke har svaret på de tre spørgsmål, der blev stillet i skrivelsen af 28. juni 1987 og gentaget i åbningsskrivelsen af 20. juni 1988; og at Den Italienske Republik bør betale sagens omkostninger."
Case C-158/90: M. Nijs v NV Transport Van schoonbeek-Mat teme - 13 December 1991 (Preliminary ruling) (Road transport - Social legislation - Monitoring) (First Chamber)
Sag C-69/90: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Italienske Republik 13.12.1991 "En stats traktatbrud - fysisk kontrol og administrative formaliteter i forbindelse med godstransport mellem medlemsstaterne - direktiv 87/53/EØF" (Domstolens plenum)
By order of 16 May 1990, which was received at the Court on 22 May 1990, the Politierechtbank, Hasselt, Belgium, referred two questions to the Court on the interpretation of Article 15(7) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 (OJ L 370, p. 8).
Ved stævning, indgivet den 16. marts 1990, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det blev fastslået, at Den Italienske Republik ikke har meddelt Kommissionen teksten til de love og administrative forskrifter, som den har udstedt med henblik på at overholde sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 87/53/E3F af 15. december 1986 (EFT 1987 L 24, s. 33), eller ikke har truffet de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktiv 87/53, og således har tilsidesat forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til direktivet og til EØF-Traktaten.
Those questions arose in criminal proceeding against Mr Nijs, who was charged, as a driver of a vehicle subject to the rules on recording equipment, with not being able to produce, when requested to do so by an authorized inspecting officer, all the record sheets for the last day of the current week and, in any case for the last day of the previous week in which he drove.
Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 87/53/EØF af 15. december 1986 om ændring af direktiv 83/643/EØF om forenkling af fysisk kontrol og administrative formaliteter i forbindelse med godstransport mellem medlemsstaterne,
"The phrase "the last day of the previous week on which he drove" used in Article 15(7) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport refers to the last driving day of the
- 13 a) idet den ikke har truffet de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme artikel 7a i Rådets direktiv 83/643/EØF af 1. december 1983, som ændret ved direktiv 87/53, og b) ikke har tilstillet Kommissionen nogen meddelelse om gennemførelse af de øvrige bestemmelser, der ved direktiv 87/53 blev indsat i direktiv 83/643.
13 - last week before the current week during which the driver concerned drove a vehicle subject to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonization of certain social legislation relating to road transport".
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 19. september 1991.
Mr Advocate General G. Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 30 April 1991.
"På baggrund af min gennemgang af sagen skal jeg foreslå, at der på alle punkter gives Kommissionen medhold, bortset fra dens påstande med hensyn til den nye artikel 5, stk. 1, litra a), anden tankestreg, og den nye artikel 8, stk. 2, i direktiv 83/643/EØF, og at den italienske regering dømmes til at betale sagens omkostninger."
"Consequently, I propose that the Court should reply as follows to the questions referred by the national court:
(Præjudiciel) "Vejtransport - sociale bestemmelser - kontrol" (Første Afdeling)
By a judgment of 23 May 1990, which was received at the Court on 31 May 1990, the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden referred two questions to the Court on the interpretation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC (OJ L 249, p. 25).
Ved kendelse af 16. maj 1990, indgået til Domstolen den 22. maj 1990, havde Politierechtbank, Hasselt (Belgien), forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 15, stk. 7, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3821/85 (EFT L 370, s. 8).
Those questions arose in a dispute between Muwi Bouwgroep BV and the Staatssecretaris van Financiën concerning the taxation of the transaction by which the capital of that company was constituted.
Spørgsmålene var blevet rejst under en straffesag mod Nijs, der er tiltalt for som fører af et køretøj, der er omfattet af reglerne om kontrolapparater, at have været ude af stand til på tilsynsmyndighedens forlangende at forevise alle diagramark for den pågældende uge, og under alle omstændigheder ikke diagramarket for den sidste dag i den nærmest foregående uge, på hvilken han havde kørt.
"The transfer of a parcel of shares which one company has in a second company and which constitutes 100% of the capital in the second company is not to be regarded as the transfer of part of the business of the first company within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, as amended by Council Directives 73/79/EEC and 73/80/EEC of 9 April 197r.
Domstolen besvarede spørgsmålene således:
Mr Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 24 October 1991.
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 30. april 1991.
The transfer of assets and liabilities of a capital company consisting in a shareholding in a second capital company is not to be regarded as the transfer of one or more parts of the business of the first company for the purposes of Article 7(l)(b) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969".
Artikel 15, stk. 7, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3821/85 skal fortolkes således, at føreren skal forevise diagramarket for den sidste køredag i den sidste uge forud for kontrollen, hvori han har ført et køretøj, der er omfattet af fællesskabsbestemmelserne."
By judgment of 11 January 1988, which was received at the Court on 18 January 1988, the Vice-President of the Tribunal de Commerce, Brussels, referred three questions to the Court on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 86 of the EEC Treaty in order to assess the compatibility with those provisions of a national scheme granting to a public body, entrusted, under the direct authority of the minister, with the establishment and running of the public telephone network and dealing in telephone equipment, the power to approve, with a view to connection to the network, the telephone equipment which it has not supplied itself.
"Kapitaltilførsel - kapitaltilførselsafgift - indskud i et selskab af en større beholdning af kapitalandele i et andet selskab"
Those questions arose in a dispute between RTT and GB which sold telephone equipment in its shops which had not received approval and which were intended to be used as a second set to be connected to an existing installations, at significantly lower prices than sets of that type offered by RTT.
(Første Afdeling)
The system of competition
Ved dom af 23. maj 1990, indgået til Domstolen den 31. maj 1990, havde Nederlandenes Hoge Raad forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 7, stk. 1, litra b), i Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969 (EFT L 249, s. 25).
Under Belgian law RTT held the monopoly for establishing and running the public telecommunications network. Moreover, only equipment supplied by or approved by RTT could be connected to the network.
Spørgsmålene var blevet rejst under en retssag mellem selskabet Muwi Bouwgroep BV og Staatssecretaris van Financiën vedrørende afgiften på den disposition, hvorved selskabet er tilført sin kapital.
The Court stated that that monopoly, which was Intended to place a public telephone network at the disposal of consumers, constituted a service of general economic interest within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Treaty.
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
The Court pointed out that it had consistently held that an undertaking with a legal monopoly may be regarded as being in a dominant position.
"Et indskud af en beholdning af kapitalandele, som et selskab besidder i et andet selskab, og som repræsenterer 100% af sidstnævnte selskabs kapital, udgør ikke et indskud af en del af førstnævnte selskabs virksomhed, som omhandlet i artikel 7, stk. 1, litra b), i Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969 om kapitaltilførselsafgifter, som ændret ved Rådets direktiver 73/79/EØF og 73/80/EØF af 9. april 1973."
An undertaking with a monopoly over the establishment and running of the network, which reserved to itself, without any objective need, an adjacent but different market, in the present case the importation, marketing, connection, bringing into service and maintenance of equipment designed to be connected to the network, thereby eliminating all competition from other undertakings, infringed Article 86 of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 24. oktober 1991.
However, Article 86 covered only anti-competitive conduct adopted by undertakings on their own initiative and not measures adopted by States.
"Jeg foreslår herefter Domstolen at besvare de af Hoge Raad forelagte spørgsmål således:
Measures adopted by States were covered by Article 90(1).
Et indskud af aktiver i et kapitalselskab, som består i andele i et andet kapitalselskab, skal ikke betragtes som et indskud af en s/1er flere dele af førstnævnte selskabs virksomhed i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 1, litra b), i Rådets direktiv 69/335/EØF af 17. juli 1969."
Consequently, if the extension of the dominant position of the public undertaking or of the undertaking to which the State had granted special or exclusive rights was a State measure, that measure Infringed Article 90 in conjunction with Article 86 of the Treaty.
13.12.1991 konkurrence - godkendelse af telefoner"
The free movement of goods
Ved dom af 11. januar 1988, indgået til Domstolen den 18. januar s.a., havde den stedfortrædende retsformand ved Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles forelagt tre præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Traktatens artikler 30 og 86 for at kunne bedømme, om det er foreneligt med disse traktatbestemmelser at anvende en national ordning, hvorved et offentligt organ, som under ministerens tilsyn forestår oprettelsen og driften af det offentlige telefonnet, og som driver handel med telefoner, tillægges beføjelse til at godkende telefoner, der skal tilsluttes telefonnettet, men som det ikke selv har leveret.
In the absence of Community rules on the establishment of public telecommunications networks and having regard to the technical diversity of the networks in the Member States, the latter retained both the power to lay down the technical specifications with which telephone equipment must comply in order to be connected to the public network, and the power to verify the suitability of such equipment to be connected to the network in order to satisfy the essential requirements of consumer protection and the smooth operation of the public network.
Spørgsmålene var blevet rejst under en tvist mellem Régie des Télégraphes et des Téléphones (RTT) og selskabet GB-Inno-BM (GB).
The Court stated that the requirement that telephone equipment must be approved before it could be connected to the network was such as to render the marketing of such equipment more difficult or more onerous.
RTT har ifølge belgisk lov monopol på at oprette og drive det offentlige telekommunikationsnet.
If judicial review were entirely out of the question, the approving authority could adopt an attitude which was arbitrary or systematically unfavourable towards imported equipment.
Kun de apparater, som leveres af RTT eller er godkendt af denne, kan tilsluttes nettet.
There was a greater probability of such an attitude being adopted by the approving authority since Importers were not entitled to a hearing in the procedures for granting approval and adopting technical standards.
I denne sammenhæng strider det mod Traktatens artikel 86, at en virksomhed, som råder over et monopol på markedet for oprettelse og drift af et net, tiltager sig - selv om dette ikke er objektivt nødvendigt - et beslægtet, men dog særskilt marked, in casu markedet for import, salg, tilslutning, ibrugtagning og
Articles 3(f), 90 and 86 of the EEC Treaty preclude a Member State from empowering the operator of its public telecommunications network to lay down specifications for telephone sets and to monitor traders* compliance therewith when that operator competes with those traders on the market for such sets;
Såfremt den offentlige virksomhed eller den virksomhed, som medlemsstaten har indrømmet særlige eller eksklusive rettigheder, udvider sin dominerende stilling i kraft af statslige foranstaltninger, vil en sådan foranstaltning stride mod Traktatens artikel 90, jf. 86.
Article 30 of the Treaty precludes a public undertaking from being empowered to approve telephone sets intended to be connected to the public network but not supplied by that undertaking if its decisions are not subject to judicial review".
En udelukkelse eller begrænsning af konkurrencen på markedet for telefoner kan derfor ikke anses for en offentlig tjenesteydelse af almindelig økonomisk interesse.
Mr Advocate General M. Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 15 March 1989.
Frie varebevægelser
He concluded:
Herom bemærkede Domstolen, at så længe der ikke findes nogen fælles EF-forskrifter vedrørende oprettelse af offentlige telekommunikationsnet, bevarer medlemsstaterne, under hensyn til de tekniske forskelle mellein de eksisterende nationale net, beføjelse til dels at fastsætte de teknisk?; forudsætninger, telefonapparaterne skal opfylde for at kunne tilsluttes det offentlige net, dels at kontrollere, om apparaterne overhovedet kan tilsluttes nettet under hensyn til, at de skal opfylde visse uomgængelige krav dels til beskyttelse af brugerne, dels til det offentlige nets rette funktion.
The legislation of a Member State that grants to a public undertaking which operates the national telecommunications network and sells equipment, an exclusive right consisting of a power to approve equipment not supplied or sold by that undertaking, in order to verify whether it meets the technical standards it has laid down and may therefore be connected to the network, and providing that the costs incurred for the connection of unauthorized equipment will be borne by the person who carried it out, is not contrary to the provisions of the EEC Treaty establishing the free movement of goods, since it provides for the possibility of judicial review of the decision refusing approval of equipment from another Member State, which must permit the verification, having regard to Community law, of the grounds for the refusal notified to the economic operator in question;
EØF-Traktatens artikler 3, litra f), 90 og 86 er til hinder for, at en medlemsstat giver et selskab, som driver det offentlige telefonnet, beføjelse til at fastsætte forskrifter for telefoner og til at kontrollere, om de erhvervsdrivende overholder forskrifterne, når selskabet selv er i konkurrence med de pågældende erhvervsdrivende på markedet for telefoner.
Case T-39/90: NV Samenwekende Elektriciteits-produktiebedri jven ν Commission of the European Communities - 12 December 1991 (Competition -- Administrative procedure -- Decision requesting Information addressed to an undertaking -- Necessary information -- Principle of proportionality and obligation of Member States to observe professional secrecy, especially in relation to public undertakings, with regard to documents forwarded to those States by the Commission) (Council Regulation No 17, Arts 10(1), 11 and 20) (Second Chamber)