natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
"Artiklerne 36 og 37 i forordning (EØF) nr. 3183/80 af 3. december 1980 om fælles gennemførelsesbestemmelser for import- og eksport li censer samt forudfastsættelsesattester for landbrugsvarer skal fortolkes således, at der ikke foreligger force majeure, når råvareforsyningen til en virksomhed, der har fået en forudfastsættelsesattest, standser på grund af en lovlig strejke i en anden virksomhed, hvis strejken på tidspunktet for virksomhedens ansøgning om attesten var varslet til iværksættelse i attestens gyldighedsperiode, men der bestod muligheder for, at strejken ikke ville udbryde eller ikke ville få virkning for virksomheden".
Because of a strike which affected transport to and from abattoirs, leading to their closure and suspension of supplies, JAKA was obliged to suspend operations for fifteen days and was unable to produce within the stipulated period the quantity of canned products necessary for it to comply with its export obligations under the terms of the certificate which expired on 31 May 1985.
Generaladvokat Jean Mischo havde fremsat forslag til afgørelse den 22. januar w:
Its request for an extension of the period of validity of that certificate to 12 July was rejected by the Ministry on the ground that the strike could not have had such long lasting effects.
- 9 - virksomhed, der har fået en forudfastsættelsesattest, standser på grund af en lovlig strejke i andre virksomheder, hvis strejken - under omstændigheder som dem, der foreligger i hovedsagen - var varslet på tidspunktet for ansøgningen om attesten til iværksættelse i attestens gyldighedsperiode, selv om der bestod mulighed for, at strejken ikke ville udbryde eller at den ikke ville få virkninger for virksomheden.
"Articles 36 and 37 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 3183/80 of 3 December 1980 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products must be interpreted as meaning that there is no force majeure where supplies of raw materials to an undertaking which has obtained a certificate of advance fixing are halted owing to a lawful strike in other undertakings if, when the undertaking applied for the certificate, a notice had already been issued that a strike would begin during the period of validity of the certificate, but it was possible that the strike would not take place or would not affect the undertaking in question."
Artiklerne 36 og 37 i forordning nr. 3183/80 skal fortolkes således, at en ophørt strejke kun kan tillægges force majeure-virkning i en periode svarende til strejkens varighed, om nødvendigt yderligere forlænget for at tage højde for forsinkelser, strejken kan have haft for genoptagelsen af produktionen, på betingelse af, at virksomhedens produktionskapacitet var fuldt udnyttet såvel ved strejkens begyndelse som i tiden herefter.
Articles 36 and 37 of Regulation No. 3183/80 must be interpreted as meaning that there can be no finding of force majeure in a case where the supply of raw materials to an undertaking which has received a certificate of advance fixing ceases by reason of a lawful strike in other undertakings if, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, the strike notice already issued when the certificate was applied for made it clear that the strike would begin during the period of validity of the certificate, even though there was a possibility that the strike would not take place in the present case or would not affect the undertaking in question.
Artiklerne 36 og 37 i forordning nr. 3183/80 skal fortolkes således, at den kompetente myndighed i den licensudstedende medlemsstat - når den skal træffe afgørelse vedrørende en anmodning, der er fremsat af indehaveren af en eksportlicens med forudfastsættelse af restitutioner, og der anmodes om enten ophævelse af licensen eller om forlængelse af dens gyldighedsperiode - i videst muligt omfang skal sørge for, at den påtænkte eksportforretning kan gennemføres til den oprindeligt forudfastsatte restitutionssats, medmindre hensynet til at undgå konkurrenceforvridninger er til hinder herfor, eller hensyn, der er forbundet med kravet om en forudsigelig markedsforvaltning, måtte pege i retning af, at en anden afgørelse vil være mere hensigtsmæssig."
Articles 36 and 37 of Regulation No. 3183/80 must be interpreted as meaning that the competent authority in the Member State in which the licence or certificate was issued must, when making a decision on the request by the holder of an export certificate fixing refunds in advance for the cancellation of the certificate or for an extension to its period of validity, make sure that it acts as far as possible in such a way that the exportation provided for can take place at the
(Domstolens plenum) "Fri bevægelighed for personer - etableringsfrihed - anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser - advokater" (Præjudiciel)
- 8 rate of refund originally fixed in advance, unless the need to avoid distorting competition militates against this or reasons based on the need to have a predictable market management make a decision to the contrary appear more expedient."
Ved kendelse af 18. september 1989, indgået til Domstolen den 3. november s.a., havde Bundesgerichtshof stillet et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EØF-Traktatens artikel 52.
By an order of 18 September 1989, which was received at the Court on 3 November 1989, the Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Court of Justice] referred a question on the interpretation of Article 52 of the EEC Treaty for a preliminary rul ing.
Spørgsmålet var blevet rejst under en sag mellem den græske advokat Vlassopoulou, Athen, og Justitsministeriet i delstaten Baden-Württemberg, som nægtede at give hende beskikkelse til at udøve erhvervet som advokat med den begrundelse, at hun ikke opfyldte de betingelser for egnethed til at udføre juridisk arbejde, som er nødvendige for at få adgang til dette erhverv.
That question arose in proceedings between Mrs Vlassopoulou, a lawyer of Greek nationality entitled to practise at the Athens Bar, and the Baden-Württemberg Ministry for Justice, which had refused to authorize her to practise as a Rechtsanwalt on the ground that she did not satisfy the conditions of eligibility to exercise judicial functions which were necessary in order to be admitted to that profession.
Normalt anses denne egnethed for erhvervet, når man har studeret jura ved et tysk universitet, bestået Erstes Staatsexamen og gennemgået en forberedende praktikantperiode afsluttet med Zweites Staatsexamen.
Such eligibility, in substance, was deemed to be acquired by legal studies at a German university, by the successful completion of the First State Examination and by a preparatory probationary period completed by a Second State Examination.
Ministeriet anførte desuden, at EØF-Traktatens
The Ministry also stated that Article 52 of the EEC Treaty did not give the applicant a right to practise her profession in Germany on the basis of the professional qualifications which she had obtained in Greece.
- 10 - artikel 52 ikke gav den pågældende ret til at udøve sit erhverv i Tyskland på grundlag af hendes faglige kvalifikationer, der var erhvervet i Grækenland.
question disregarded knowledge and qualifications which had already been acquired by the person concerned in another Member State.
Ifølge den italienske og den tyske regering fremgår det af Traktatens artikel 52, at da der hverken foreligger fællesskabsregler om harmonisering af betingelserne for adgang til selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed som advokat og udøvelse heraf, eller direktiver om gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser, som giver adgang til erhvervet som advokat, kan en medlemsstat betinge beskikkelse som advokat af, at den pågældende opfylder betingelser i national ret, som ikke indeholder forskelsbehandling. ling.
It followed, in the Court's view, that a Member State before whose courts an application had been made for authorization to practise a profession, admission to which was dependent under national law on the possession of a diploma or a professional qualification, was under an obligation to take account of diplomas, certificates and other qualifications which the person concerned had obtained for the purpose of practising that same profession in another Member State, by comparing the qualifications evidenced by those diplomas and the knowledge and qualifications required by the national rules in such a way that it might objectively be satisfied that the foreign diploma proved that its holder had knowledge and qualifications which, if not identical, were at least equivalent to those evidenced by the national diploma.
Domstolen bemærkede hertil, at nationale betingelser om kvalifikationer, selv om de anvendes uden forskelsbehandling på grundlag af nationalitet, kan medføre, at andre medlemsstaters statsborgere hindres i at udøve den etableringsret, som er garanteret dem ved Trakatens artikel 52.
If that comparative examination revealed only partial equivalence of knowledge and qualifications, the host Member State was entitled to require the person concerned to establish that he had acquired the knowledge and qualifications lacking.
Dette kan være tilfældet, såfremt der i de pågældende nationale bestemmelser ikke tages hensyn til kundskaber og kvalifikationer, som den pågældende allerede har erhvervet i en anden medlemsstat.
The Court stressed finally that it had to be possible for a decision by the authorities of the host Member State to be made the subject of judicial proceedings in which its legality under Community law could be reviewed, and for the person concerned to ascertain the reasons for the decision.
Hvis det af denne sammenligning fremgår, at der kun er delvis overensstemmelse mellem disse kundskaber og kvalifikationer, er modtagelsesmedLemsstaten berettiget til at kræve, at den pågældende godtgør at besidde de manglende kundskaber og kvalifikationer.
"Article 52 of the EEC Treaty must be interpreted as meaning that the national authorities of a Member State, to which a request for authorization to practise as a lawyer is made by a Community national who is already permitted to practise as a lawyer in his country of origin, and practises as a legal adviser in that country, are required to examine to what extent the knowledge and qualifications attested by the qualification acquired by the person concerned in his country of origin correspond to those required by the rules of the host State; where there is only partial equivalence of qualifications, the national authorities in question are entitled to require the person concerned to establish that he has acquired the knowledge and qualifications lacking."
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
He concluded as follows:
"EØF-Traktatens artikel 52 skal fortolkes således, at en medlemsstats nationale myndigheder, når de får forelagt en ansøgning om beskikkelse som advokat, indgivet af en fællesskabsstatsborger, som allerede i sin hjemstat er beskikket som advokat, og som i modtagelsesstaten virker som juridisk konsulent, skal undersøge, i hvilket omfang de kundskaber og kvalifikationer, der fremgår af det eksamensbevis, som den pågældende har erhvervet i sit hjemland, svarer til dem, der kræves efter modtagelsesstatens lovgivning;
"The obligation contained in Article 52 of the EEC Treaty not to treat Community nationals less favourably when they wish to carry on activities in the territory of more than one Member State, must be interpreted as meaning that the competent authorities of a Member State, in assessing an
Såfremt der kun er delvis overensstemmelse mellem disse eksamensbeviser, er de pågældende nationale myndigheder berettiget til at kræve, at den pågældende godtgør, at besidde de manglende kundskaber og kvalifikationer."
Bearing in mind the Member State's central rôle and the extent of the responsibilities which it had assumed regarding the presentation and supervision of the costs of the training courses, the Court held that the opportunity for it to submit its observations prior to the adoption of a decision definitively reducing the aid payable amounted to a substantial formal requirement, non­compliance with which resulted in the contested decision being declared void.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 28. november 1990.
The decision of 19 July 1989 declaring ineligible expenditure in the amount of Esc 62 479 600 in relation to the Application for Assistance No. 870840/PI, submitted to the European Social Fund, is deciared void;
Sag C-291/89: Interhotel mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
He proposed that the Court should:
(Anden Afdeling) "Socialpolitik - Den Europæiske Socialfond - annullationssøgsmål vedrørende en beslutning om nedsættelse af et allerede bevilget tilskud"
Annul in part the Commission decision of 19 July 1989 relating to Project No. 870840/P1 of the European Social Fund in so far as it refuses to pay Interhotel aid relating to qualified professionals in the amount of Esc 3 321 000;
Det fremgik af sagen, at den anfægtede beslutning var blevet meddelt af Kommissionen til de portugisiske myndigheder i form af en begrundet retsakt, hvorved myndighederne i det væsentlige blev oplyst om, at Fondens tilskud i henhold til artikel 6, stk. 1, i Rådets forordning nr. 2950/83 var blevet nedsat i forhold til det oprindeligt bevilgede ti Iskud.
Case C­304/89: Estabelecimentos Isidoro M. Oliveira SA ν Commission of the European Communities ­ 7 May 1991 (Social policy ­ European Social Fund ­ Application for the annulment of the reduction in financial assistance originally approved) (Second Chamber)
Domstolen udtalte, at den anfægtede beslutning i dette omfang - skønt den var rettet til Republikken Portugal - berørte sagsøgeren umiddelbart og individuelt, jfr. Traktatens artikel 173, stk. 2, fordi den berøvede sagsøgeren en del af det tilskud, der oprindeligt var blevet bevilget, samt at medlemsstaterne herved ikke råder over noget selvstændigt skøn.
By an application lodged on 5 October 1989, the undertaking Estabelecimentos Isidoro M. Oliveira SA sought the annulment of two Commission decisions of 27 June 1989 reducing the assistance which the European Social Fund had originally approved in respect of two training projects submitted on behalf of the applicant.
Det var i sagen ubestridt, at Kommissionen end ikke før vedtagelsen af den anfægtede beslutning havde givet Republikken Portugal lejlighed til at fremsætte sine bemærkninger, hvorfor Kommissionen havde tilsidesat
For the essential points in the legal reasoning of the Court, see the judgment in Case C­291/89 above.
Domstolen fastslog endvidere, at når henses til medlemsstatens centrale rolle og vigtigheden af det ansvar, den varetager ved forelæggelsen og kontrollen med finansiering af uddannelsesforanstaltninger, udgør vedkommende medlemsstats mulighed for at fremsætte sine bemærkninger forud for vedtagelsen af en endelig beslutning om nedsættelse af et tilskud en væsentlig formforskrift, hvis tilsidesættelse medfører, at den anfægtede beslutning bliver ugyldig.
The decisions of 27 June 1989 declaring ineligible expenditure totalling Esc 63 450 244 and Esc 23 713 486 in relation to the Applications for Assistance Nos. 870708/PI and 870708/P3 respectively, submitted to the European Social Fund, are deci ared void;
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The Commission is ordered to pay the costs."
Han foreslog følgende afgørelse:
Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Sag C-304/89:
In the alternative:
(Anden Afdeling) "Socialpolitik - Den Europæiske Socialfond - annullaiionssøgsmål en beslutning om nedsættelse af et allerede bevilget tilskud"
Annul in part the Commission decision of 27 June 1989 relating to Project No. 870708/P1 of the Fund in so far as it refuses to pay aid in connexion with the preparation and translation of manuals and with budgetary administration and supervision in the amounts of Esc 2 247 308 and Esc 1 900 080 respectively;
For så vidt angår Domstolens argumentation, henvises til ovennævnte sag C-291/89.
Annul in part the Commission decision of 27 June 1989 relating to Project No. 870708/P3 of the Fund in so far as it refuses to pay aid relating to teaching materials and to the functioning and administration of courses in the amounts of Esc 1 637 612 and Esc 5 461 160 respectively;
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Order the reimbursement of costs."
Han foreslog følgende afgørelse:
Post GmbH, on the other hand, took the view that the product came under subheading 0404 10 11.
- annullation af Kommissionens beslutninger af 27. juni 1989 vedrørende projekterne nr. 870708/P1 og nr. 870708/P3 under Den Europæiske Socialfond;
In the Court's view, it was clear from the explanatory notes on heading 0404 of the Common Customs Tariff that the partial removal of lactose from the product in question did not affect its quality as "whey" within the meaning of that subheading.
- delvis annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 27. juni 1989 vedrørende projekt nr. 870708/P3 under Fonden, for så vidt som Kommissionen herved nægter tilskud til pædagogisk materiale, samt kursernes funktion og forvaltning, med hensyn til beløb på 1.637.612 og 5.461.160 escudos;
"The Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as meaning that a product specified as "75% whey protein concentrate", containing 76.6% protei η, 5% lactose and 2.1% milk fat, without detectible sugar, obtained by the ultra­filtration of whey, must be classified under subheading 0404 90 33, "products consisting of natural milk constituents ...", of the Common Customs Tariff, in that subheading's version in the annex to Commission Regulation No. 3174/88 of 21 September 1988 amending annex I to Council Regulation (EECJ No. 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff."
Spørgsmålet var blevet forelagt under en retssag mellem Ludwig Post GmbH og Oberfinanzdirektion München angående sidstnævntes beslutning om at tarifere et produkt med betegnelsen "75% valleproteinkoncentrat" i underpos. 04 04 90 33 med den begrundelse, at lactoseindholdet i dette produkt kun androg ca. en fjortendedel af den værdi, der sædvanligvis er indeholdt i vallepulver.
"The combined nomenclature, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No. 3174/88, must be interpreted as meaning that whey powder obtained by ultra­filtration, containing 76.6% protein, 2.1% milk fat and 5% lactose, without detectable sugar, must be classified under subheading 0404 90 33."
"Den Fælles Toldtarif skal fortolkes således, at et produkt, der benævnes '75% valleproteinkoncentrat!, og som er fremstillet ved ultrafiltrering af valle, og med et indhold på 76,6% mælkeprotein, 5% Lactose og 2,1% mælkefedt, samt uden påviseligt sukkerindhold, skal tariferes i tariffens underpos. 04 04 90 33, "varer bestående af naturlige mælkebestanddele ...", som affattet ved bilaget til Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3174/88 af 21. september 1988 om ændring af bilag I til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2658/87 om told- og statistiknomenklaturen og Den Fælles Toldtarif".
By an order of 12 October 1988, which was received at the Court on 17 November 1989, the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, referred a number of questions for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty, in order to determine whether British legislation governing the retail sale of sex articles was compatible with those provisions of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 7. marts wxr.
Those questions had arisen in proceedings between Sheptonhurst and Newham Borough Council concerning the refusal by the latter to grant the company the necessary authorization to run a shop selling sex articles.
Han foreslog følgende afgørelse:
The Court ruled as follows:
"Den Kombinerede Nomenklatur, som affattet ved forordning (EØF) nr. 3174/88, skal fortolkes således, at vallepulver, der er fremstillet ved ultrafiltrering og med et indhold på 76,6% mælkeprotein, 5% lactose og 2,1% mælkefedt, samt uden påviseligt sukkerindhold, skal tariferes i underpos. 04 04 90 33".
"Article 30 of the EEC Treaty should be construed as meaning that national provisions prohibiting the sale of lawful sex articles from unlicensed sex establishments do not constitute a measure having an effect equivalent to a quantitative restriction on imports."
(Fjerde Afdeling) "Frie varebevægelser - fortolkning af Traktatens artikler 30 og 36 - national lovgivning om forbud mod salg mod pornografiske artikler fra uautoriserede forretninger" (Præjudiciel)
"The questions referred must receive the same reply as in Case C-23/89.
Ved kendelse af 12. oktober 1988, indgået til Domstolen den 17. november 1989, havde High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division, stillet flere præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EØF-Traktatens artikler 30 og 36 med henblik på en vurdering af, om den britiske lovgivning vedrørende betingelser for salg i detailleddet af pornografiske artikler var forenelig med de nævnte bestemmelser.
The Court should therefore declare that Article 30 of the EEC Treaty must be interpreted as meaning that national provisions prohibiting the sale of lawful sex articles from unlicensed establishments cannot be regarded as measures having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions on imports."
Sag C-266/89: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Italienske Republik 8.5.1991
Case C-266/89:
(Domstolens plenum) "Transport - traktatbrud - statistisk registrering af vejgodstrafikken -manglende opfyldelse af dom fra Domstolen"
Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic - 8 May 1991 (Transport - Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods by road - Non­compliance with a judgment of the Court) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indleveret den 23. august 1989, havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Den Italienske Republik havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EØF-Traktatens artikel 171 ved ikke at have truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger til at opfylde Domstolens dom af 11. juli 1985 i sagen Kommissionen mod Italien.
By an application lodged on 23 August 1989, the Commission brought an action seeking a declaration that by not taking the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of 11 July 1985 in Case 101/84, Commission ν Italy, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 28. februar 1991
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 28 February 1991.
Hans konklusion lød således:
He concluded as follows:
"Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EØF-Traktatens artikel 171 ved fortsat ikke, trods Domstolens dom af 11. juli 1985, at have gennemført Rådets direktiv 78/546/EØF af 12. juni 1978 om statistisk
"By continuing not to apply Council Directive 78/546/EEC of 12 June 1978 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods by road, as part of regional statistics, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty. The defendant State should be ordered to pay the costs."
- 16 - registrering af vejgodstrafikken inden for rammerne af en regional statistik." stik."
- 16 interpretation of Commission Regulations (EEC) No. 2541/84 and (EEC) No. 644/85.
Disse spørgsmål var blevet rejst under en sag mellem de ovenfor nævnte parter vedrørende betaling af udligningsafgifter af etanol, der er fremstillet af landbrugsprodukter i Frankrig, som sagsøgeren i hovedsagen havde indført til Italien, og som efter dér at være blevet blandet med andre produkter med henblik på fremstilling af forskellige likører, \/ar blevet udført til andre medlemsstater.
Those questions had arisen in proceedings between the abovementioned parties concerning the payment of countervailing charges on ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin produced in France and imported into Italy by the applicants in the main proceedings which, after having been blended there with other products and processed into various liqueurs, was subsequently exported to other Member States.