natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Præjudiciel - Divisional Court, Queen's Bench Division - fortolkningen af artikel 3, stk. 1, og artikel 9 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3508/92 af 27. november 1992 om et integreret system for forvaltning og kontrol af visse EF-støttcordninger — oplysninger indeholdt i en database oprettet i henhold til forordningens artikel 2 adgang til disse oplysninger - sanktioner pålagt i henhold til artikel 9 i forordning (EØF) nr. 3887/92 af 23. december 1992 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for det integrerede system for forvaltning og kontrol af visse EF-støtteordninger - anvendelse på en person, der havde fået afslag på adgang til oplysningerne i ovennævnte database - lovlighed
The principle of protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty form part of the Community legal order and must be observed by the Member States when they exercise the powers conferred on them by Community directives.
Præjudiciel — Cour du travail, Mons — fortolkning af artikel 22, stk. 1, litra c), og artikel 36 i forordning nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 -bestemmelser, der finder anvendelse på godtgørelse af hospitalsudgifter, der er afholdt i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor den kompetente institution er beliggende
However, in the specific circumstances of the present case, it is not for this Court but for the national court to determine whether a breach of those principles has been committed by the retroactive repeal of a law in respect of which the implementing decree was never adopted.
Præjudiciel — Immigration Appel Tribunal gyldigheden af artikel 6, stk. 1, i afgørelse 1/80 fra Associeringsrådet EØF-Tyrkiet, for så vidt rækkevidden af artikel 12 i aftalen om oprettelse af en associering mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Tyrkiet af 12.
'Article 2 of the First Council Directive (67/227/EEC) of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes is to be interpreted as not precluding a Member State which
Sag C-374/98 Kommissionen / Frankrig september 1963 herved begrænses — spørgsmålet, om associeringsaftalens artikel 12 har direkte virkning - fortolkning af begrebet »tilknytning til det lovlige arbejdsmarked i en bestemt medlemsstat« i artikel 6, stk. 1, i afgørelse 1/80
has availed itself of the possibility provided for by Article 13C of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment and
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — undladelse af at udlægge lokaliteten »Basses Corbières« som særligt beskyttet område for visse fuglearter (artikel 4, stk. 1 og 2, i Rådets direktiv 79/409/EØF om beskyttelse af vilde fugle) — undladelse af at træffe passende foranstaltninger for at undgå forstyrrelser og forringelser af levestederne for visse vilde fuglearter som følge af åbningen og driften af stenbrud (artikel 6, stk. 2, 3 og 4, i Rådets direktiv 92/43/EØF om bevaring af naturtyper samt vilde dyr og planter)
It is for the national court to determine whether a breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations or of the principle of legal certainty has been committed by the retroactive repeal of a law in respect of which the implementing decree has not been adopted'
Præjudiciel - High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division - fortolkning af artikel 2, stk. 3, og artikel 4, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 92/43/EØF af 21. maj 1992 om bevaring af naturtyper samt vilde dyr og planter — afgrænsning af de særlige bevaringsområder -medlemsstaternes skønsbeføjelser — økonomiske, sociale og kulturelle behov - Severn Estuary Sag C-372/98 The Queen ex parte: J.H. Cooke & Sons / Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Præjudiciel - Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (2. Afdeling) — fortolkning af artikel 5, stk. 4, i Rådets direktiv 90/435/EØF af 23. juli 1990 om en fælles beskatningsordning for moder- og datterselskaber fra forskellige medlemsstater -midlertidig undtagelse for Portugal med hensyn til beskatning af udbytte til moderselskaber i en anden medlemsstat — lovmæssigheden af en skat af arv og gaver, der opkræves som et fast beløb, og som årligt pålægges udbyttet af visse værdipapirer (aktier, obligationer)
'Article 2 of the First Council Directive (67/227/EEC) of 11 April 1%7 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes does not preclude the provisions of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment and in particular Article 13C and B(b) thereof from being interpreted as not preventing a Member State which has availed itself of the possibilites provided for by Article 13C of the Sixth Council Directive and which has thus granted its taxpayers the right to opt for taxation of certain lettings of immovable property from abolishing, by a subsequent law — even retroactively - and reintroducing thus reintroducing the exemption in its wiedes sense. That interpretation applies, however, only to the extent to which
Præjudiciel High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - fortolkning af artikel 2 i Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 762/94 af 6. april 1994 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1765/92 for så vidt angår jordudtagning - udtrykket »et areal, der i det foregående år er blevet dyrket med henblik på høst« - rækkevidde
It is for the national court to determine whether a breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations or of the principle of legal certainty has been committed by the retroactive repeal of a law in respect of which the implementing decree has not been adopted.'
Sag T-184/98 Dorothy Bell m.fl. / Rådet og Kommissionen
Advocate General P. Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 3 December 1998.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Case C-367/98 Commission ν Portugal
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse· og Informationsafdeling (I .-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik pä en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Case C-369/98 The Queen ex parte: Trevor Robert Fisher and Penny Fisher, trading as TR and Ρ Fisher / Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Articles 52, 56, 58, 73 et seq. and 221 of the EC Treaty and Articles 221 to 231 of the 1985 Act of Accession — Conditions for the privatisation of certain undertakings — Limitations on the acquisition of holdings (at the time of privatisation and subsequently) by nations and undertakings of other Member States
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
Case C-368/98 Abdon Vanbraekel and Others ν Alliance nationale des mutualités chrétiennes (ANMC)
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 7.12.1998 Katalognr.: DX-AC-98-0030-DA-C
6, Annex 1) - Provisions applicable to the reimbursement of the costs of
Forenede sager C-173/96 og C-247/96 Francisca Sánchez Hidalgo m.fl. / Asociación de Servicios Aser m.fl. Socialpolitik
Joined Cases C-173/96 and C-247/96 Francisca Sánchez Hidalgo and Others v Asociación de Servicios Aser and Others Social policy
Sag C-328/97 Glob-Sped AG / Hauptzollamt Lörrach Frie varebevægelser
Case C-328/97 Glob-Sped AG v Hauptzollamt Lörrach Free movement of goods
Sag C-221/97 Aloys Schröder m.fl. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
CaseC-221/97 Aloys Schroder and Others v Commission of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
Sag C-166/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik
Case C-166/97 14 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
Forenede sager C-127/96, C-229/96 - C-74/97 4 Francisco Hernández Vidal SA / Prudencia Gómez Pérez m.fl. Socialpolitik
Joined Cases C-127/96, C-229/96 to C-74/97 Francisco Hernández Vidal SA v Prudencia Gómez Pérez and Others Social policy
ENDELIGE DOMME
NEW CASES
Omnummerering af traktaterne
Renumbering of the Treaties
Sag C-328/97 Glob-Sped AG / Hauptzollamt Lörrach Frie varebevægelser
Case C-328/97 Glob-Sped AG ν Hauptzollamt Lörrach Free movement of goods
Ved kendelse af 12. august 1997, har Bundesfinanzhof forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål om fortolkningen af pos. 3004 i bilag I til Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2505/92, for så vidt angår tariferingen af præparater på grundlag af C-vitamin.
The questions were raised in proceedings between Glob­Sped AG and the Hauptzollamt Lörrach (Principal Customs Office) concerning the tariff classification of two vitamin preparations, namely Taxofit Vitamin C + Ca Brausetabletten and Taxofit Vitamin C Kautabletten.
Disse to spørgsmål er blevet rejst i forbindelse med en tvist mellem Glob-Sped AG og Hauptzollamt Lörrach (hovedtoldkontoret i Lörrach) vedrørende tariferingen af to vitaminprodukter, nemlig Taxofit Vitamin C + Ca Brausetabletten og Taxofit Vitamin C Kautabletten.
By order of 12 August 1997, the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling two questions on the interpretation of heading No 3004 of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2505/92 concerning the classification of vitamin C­based preparations.
»Den kombinerede nomenklatur som fastlagt i bilag I til Kommissionens forordning nr. 2505192 af 14. juU 1992 om oendring af bMg I colini Rådets fowrdning(EØF)nr. 2658/87 om told- og statistiknomenklaturen og den fælles toldtarif skal fortolkes således, at produkter som Taxofit Vitamin C + Ca Brausetabletten og Taxofit Vitamin C Kautabletten skal tariferes i pos. 3004.·
'The Combined Nomenclature, as laid down in Annex I to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2505/92 of 14 July 1992 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariffand statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff is to be interpreted as meaning that products such as Taxofit Vitamin C + Ca Brausetabletten and Taxofit Vitamin C Kautabletten are to be classified under heading No 3004.'
Generaladvokat N.Fennelly fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Første Afdeling) den 1. oktober 1998.
Advocate General N.Fennelly delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 1 October 1998.
»Produkter af den i forelæggelseskendelsen beskrevne art skal tariferes i pos.
In the light of the foregoing, he recommended that the Court respond as follows to the questions referred by the national court:
3004 50 10 i den kombinerede nomenklatur, således som denne er fastsat ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2505/92 af 14. juli 1992 om ændring af bilag I og II til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2658/87 om told- og statistiknomenklaturen og den fælles toldtarif.«
Products such as those described in the order for reference are to be classified under heading No 3004 50 10 of the Combined Nomenclature, in the version established by Commission Regulation
Fri bevægelighed for personer
10 December 1998 workers
Præjudiciel »Social sikring — grænsearbejdere
Preliminary ruling (Social security — Frontier (Third Chamber)
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
The first question
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling') den 16. juli 1998.
The first point to note is that Article 51(1) of the Regulation is to be interpreted as meaning that where there are administrative checks and a medical examination of a person in receipt of invalidity benefits who is staying or resident in a Member State other than that where the institution responsible for payment is located, those checks and that examination must be carried out by the institution where he is staying or resident, with the competent institution being entitled, if it deems necessary, to carry out an additional examination.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare de præjudicielle spørgsmål på følgende måde:
To - that end, the competent institution may require the person in question to travel to the Member State in which it is established, provided that it reimburses the associated travel and subsistence expenses and that the person is able to make the journey without prejudice to his health.
»1) Artikel 51, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 574/72 er til hinder for, at den kompetente institution i en medlemsstat stiller krav til modtageren af en ydelse i anledning af invaliditet om at lade sig underkaste en lægelig undersøgelse i den medlemsstat, hvor institutionen er hjemmehørende, uden forinden at have anmodet om, at han undersøges af den kompetente institution i den medlemsstat, hvor han bor.
It must be observed next that Article 51 is expressly applicable subject to the condition, which is satisfied in the main proceedings, that the worker is already receiving invalidity benefit under the legislation of the competent Member State when the medical examination is requested.
Den omstændighed, at modtageren har været grænsearbejder dengang han blev ramt af uarbejdsdygtighed og i tilslutning dertil af invaliditet, er irrelevant i den forbindelse.
Nothing in the text of Article 51 enables the conclusion to be drawn that it would not apply in the event of amendment — even extensive amendment — of the applicable legislation; nor is there any reason to suppose that the competent institution would not be in a position to apply
Artikel 40 i forordning nr. 574/72 er ikke til hinder for, at den kompetente institution ved afgørelsen af, om der består en ret til en ydelse i anledning af invaliditet, fastlægger arbejdstagerens invaliditetsgrad alene på grundlag af de lægeundersøgelser, der er gennemført af de under dén stående tjenester.
By its first question, the national court is essentially asking whether, in the case of a former frontier worker in receipt of invalidity benefit, who is resident in a Member State other than that of the institution responsible for payment and whose place of residence is nearer to that institution than to the institution of his place of residence, Article 51(1) of the Regulation precludes the competent institution from carrying out the relevant administrative checks and medical examinations without requesting that the institution at his place of residence carry out a prior examination.
Artikel 40 i forordning nr. 574/72 er til hinder for, at institutionen i den medlemsstat, hvis lovgivning den pågældende arbejdstager var omfattet af på det tidspunkt, da arbejdsudygtigheden og den deraf følgende invaliditet indtrådte, fastlægger invaliditetsgraden for ham uden at tage hensyn til den
the provisions of the new legislation on the basis of the medical file already in its possession which could, in appropriate cases, be supplemented by information arising as a result of an examination performed in accordance with Article 51(1).
dokumentation og de lægeerklæringer, der er blevet udarbejdet for institutioner i enhver medlemsstat, når arbejdstageren har været omfattet af sociallovgivningen i andre medlemsstater, og når institutionerne i disse medlemsstater i henhold til den i samme forordnings artikel 39 fastlagte procedure har tilstillet den denne dokumentation og disse erklæringer.«
requesting a prior examination by the institution of the place of residence and, if the reply is in the negative, whether that provision precludes the competent institution from not taking into account documents and medical reports, and administrative information, from the institution in the State where the person resides.
»Eksportrestitutioner — nomenklaturen for landbrugsprodukter* (Tredje Afdeling)
That does not alter the fact that a recipient of invalidity benefit must be entitled to waive a prior medical examination by the institution at his place of residence and so undergo his first examination at the institution of the competent State.
Spørgsmålet er rejst under en sag mellem Georg Bruner og Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas vedrørende tildeling af restitutioner i forbindelse med eksport af fjerkrækød fra Tyskland til Ækvatorialguinea, der blev foretaget i tiden fra den 21. juni 1988 til den 16. januar 1989.
In that connection, it must be observed that nothing in the wording of Article 40 leads to the conclusion that the medical examination and administrative checks carried out by the institution responsible for payment in order initially to establish the degree of invalidity must be preceded by an examination by the institution of the Member State in which a worker resides.
Ved kendelse af 26. juni 1997 har Bundesfinanzhof forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3846/87 af 17. december 1987 om fastsættelsen af nomenklaturen over eksportrestitutioner for landbrugsprodukter (EFT L 366, s. 1).
Indeed, it must be accepted that, having regard to the objectives of the rules in dispute, namely to protect the interests of the recipient of invalidity benefits, it cannot be the subject of a general exclusion. A waiver of that kind must, however, be accompanied by minimum guarantees, namely that it was both freely made and unambiguous.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The second and third questions
Generaladvokat N. Fennelly fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling') den 16. juli 1998.
According to that provision, it is for the institution of the Member State whose legislation was applicable at the time when incapacity for work followed by invalidity occurred to determine, in accordance with that legislation, whether the person concerned satisfies the conditions for entitlement to benefits.
»I eksportrestitutionsnomenklaturen ifølge bilag 8 til Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3846/87 af 17. december 1987 om fastsættelsen af nomenklaturen over eksportrestitutioner for landbrugsprodukter, som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 717/88 af 18. marts 1988 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutioner for fjerkrækød og Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3216/88 af 19. oktober 1988 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutioner for fjerkrækød, skal nomenklaturen 'ex 0207411Γ fortolkes således,
In the case of a former frontier worker and recipient of invalidity benefits who uves in a Member State other man that of the institution responsible for payment, and whose place of residence is nearer to the institution of the competent Member State than to the institution of the State of residence, Article 51(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the
at den dengang de begivenheder, der har givet anledning til sagen i hovedsagen, udspillede sig, omfattede kyllingebagstykker udskåret på tværs til rygraden, men naturligt holdt sammen af rygskindet.«
However, the provision does not preclude the worker from waiving the right to undergo the prior examination by the institution of his place of residence, provided that his waiver is freely made and unambiguous.
Forenede sager C-127/96, C-229/96 - C-74/97 Francisco Hernández Vidal SA / Prudencia Gómez Pérez m.fl. Socialpolitik
However, the competent institution must take account of any documents, medical reports and administrative information from the institution in the Member State in which the worker resides.
Ifølge Domstolens praksis er formålet med direktiv 77/187 at sikre en fortsættelse af de bestående ansættelsesforhold inden for en økonomisk enhed, selv om denne skifter indehaver.
Article 51(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, precludes the institution responsible for payment in a Member State from obliging the recipient of invalidity benefits from undergoing a medical examination in that State without previously requesting that he be examined by the competent institution of the Member State of residence.
Det afgørende ved vurderingen af, om der foreligger en overførsel i direktivets forstand, er, om den pågældende økonomiske enhed har bevaret sin identitet, hvilket navnlig må lægges til grund, såfremt driften faktisk fortsættes eller genoptages.
The fact that the recipient was a frontier worker when he became unfit for work and subsequently became an invalid is irrelevant in that regard.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under sager, der for den førstes sags vedkommende føres af Francisco Hernández Vidal SA mod Prudencia og Maria Gómez Pérez og mod Contratas y Limpiezas SL, og som for den anden sags vedkommende er anlagt af Friedrich Santner mod Hoechst AG og for den tredje sags vedkommende af Mercedes Gómez Montaña mod Claro Sol SA og mod Red Nacional de Ferrocarriles Españoles (de spanske statsbaner.
However, where the person concerned has waived the procedure which Article 51(1) of Regulation No 574/72 provides for him and voluntarily travels to the Member State of the institution responsible for payment, he can no longer subsequently, where he does not agree with the results of the examinations which he has undergone there, require that the procedure recommence in order to be first examined by the competent institution of the Member State of which he is a resident.
Domstolen har således fastslået, at anvendelsesområdet for direktiv 77/187 kan omfatte en situation, hvor en virksomhed ved aftale overdrager det til en anden virksomhed at udføre rengøringsarbejde, som den tidligere varetog direkte, og en situation, hvor en ordregiver, som har overdraget rengøringen af sine lokaler til én entreprenør, opsiger aftalen med denne og indgår en ny aftale med en anden entreprenør vedrørende udførelsen af tilsvarende arbejde.
Article 40 of Regulation No 574/72 does not preclude the competent institution from determining the degree of invalidity on the basis of its own medical examination before acknowledging entitlement to invalidity benefits.
Med spørgsmålene, som må undersøges under ét, ønsker de forelæggende retter oplyst, om og på hvilke betingelser direktiv 77/187 finder anvendelse i en situation, hvor en virksomhed,
Article 40 of Regulation No 574/72 precludes the institution of the Member State to whose legislation that worker was subject when he became unfit to work and subsequently invalid from determining the degree of invalidity without taking into account documents and medical reports from every Member State where the worker was subject to the social security legislation of other Member States and that, in accordance with the procedure laid down by Article 39 of the same regulation, the institutions of those States have forwarded such documents and reports.'
virksomhed til den anden.
10 December 1998
Begrebet enhed omfatter således en organiseret helhed af personer og aktiver, der gør det muligt at udøve en økonomisk virksomhed med et selvstændigt formål.
Preliminary ruling (Export refunds — Nomenclature of agricultural products) (Third Chamber)
En økonomisk enhed kan således navnlig i visse brancher fungere uden materielle eller immaterielle aktiver af betydning, og det kan i så fald ikke være afgørende for, om enheden opretholdes efter den pågældende transaktion, at der overdrages sådanne aktiver.
The question was raised in proceedings between Mr Bruner, and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (Hamburg-Jonas Principal Customs Office) in relation to the grant of refunds on exports of poultry from Germany to Equatorial Guinea between 21 June 1988 and 16 January 1989.
I visse brancher, som f.eks. rengøring, er disse aktiver ofte begrænset til det mest elementære, og den aktivitet, der udøves, er hovedsagelig baseret på arbejdskraften. Derfor kan en organiseret helhed af lønmodtagere, som specielt og i længere tid udfører opgaver i fællesskab, når der ikke er tale om andre produktionsfaktorer, udgøre en økonomisk enhed.
By order of 26 June 1997, the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 of 17 December 1987 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds (OJ 1987 L 366, p. 1).