natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- idet franske statsborgere, der udøver advokatvirksomhed i en anden medlemsstat end Den Franske Republik, ikke er omfattet af bestemmelserne om advokaters frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser i Frankrig;
The French Republic did not contest its failure in relation to the first two objections.
- idet den advokat, der udfører tjenesteydelsen, skal handle i forbindelse med en i en fransk retskreds hjemmehørende advokat, når de møder for en
As regards the third objection it contends that the obligation to have recourse to a lawyer with a right of audience before the court before which the matter is pending in order to represent a client is justified by the fact that under Article 5 of the directive that lawyer is responsible
­ 11 ­ myndighed eller et organ, der ikke er en domstol, og når de udfører en opgave, ved hvilken advokatbistand ikke efter fransk ret er obligato­risk;
- 11 - vis-à-vis the Court to observance of the applicable procedural rules and ethics.
­ idet den advokat, der udfører tjenesteydelsen, i en borgerlig sag med advokattvang for en Tribunal de grande instance, skal give møde ved en i vedkommende retskreds hjemmehørende advokat eller en advokat med møderet for vedkommende Tribunal de grande instance.
(c) requiring a lawyer providing services who appears before a Tribunal de Grande Instance [Regional Court], in civil cases where it is compulsory to be represented by a lawyer, to retain a lawyer who is a member of the Bar of that court or is authorized to plead before it in order to conduct the proceedings or carry out the procedural formalities.
Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland betaler sine egne omkostninger."
The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay its own costs.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 7. maj 1991.
Mr Advocate General G. Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 7 Mav 1991.
Hans forslag til afgørelse lød således:
He proposed that the Court should:
­ idet den har pålagt en tjenesteydende advokat at handle i forbindelse med en på fransk område etableret advokat også ved udførelsen af opgaver, ved hvilken advokatbistand ikke efter fransk ret er obligato­risk;
Declare that the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 59 and 60 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 77/249 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services by: depriving French nationals who practise law in a Member State other than the French Republic of the benefit of the right under the directive; requiring the lawyer providing services to act in conjunction with a lawyer established in French territory even in the case where it is not mandatory to have a lawyer; by subjecting the lawyer providing services to the principle of territorial exclusivity in representing a client;
Sagsøgte tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.
Order the defendant to pay the costs;
De forenede sager C­90/90 og C­91/90: Jean Neu m.fl. mod statssekretæren for landbrug og vinavl
Joined Cases C-90/90 and C-91/90: Jean Neu and Others ν Secretary of State for Agriculture and Viticulture
(Præjudiciel) ■Landbrug ­ tillægsafgift på mælk" (Tredje Afdeling)
(preliminary ruling) (Agriculture - Additional milk levy) (Third Chamber)
Ved domme af 21. marts 190, indgået til Domstolen den 27. marts s.a., havde Storhertugdømmet Luxembourgs Conseil d'Etat forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 7, stk. 2, og 3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84.
By judgments of 21 March 1990, which were received at the Court on 27 March 1990, the Conseil d'Etat of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg referred two questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 7 (2) (3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 857/84.
Spørgsmålene var blevet rejst under en række sager, anlagt af 13 luxembourgske mælkeproducenter til prøvelse af en beslutning, som statssekretæren havde truffet i medfør af de luxembourgske gennemførelsesbestemmelser til EF's forordninger på foranledning af, at de pågældende producenter havde skiftet mejeri. Ved beslutningen var 90% af de individuelle referencemængder, som producenterne rådede over hos deres tidligere opkøber i henhold til formel B, blevet overført til det nye mejeri, samtidig med, at 10% af disse mængder var blevet fØrt tilbage til den nationale reserve.
Those questions arose in proceedings between 13 producers established in Luxembourg and the Secretary of State for Agriculture and Viticulture in relation to the latter's decision, following the producers' changing the dairy with which they dealt and pursuant to the Luxembourg rules adopted for the implementation of the Community system on the subject, to transfer 90% of the individual reference quantities which the producers in question had under formula Β with their former purchaser, to the new dairy and to transfer 10% of the quantity to the national reserve.
"Bestemmelserne i artikel 7, stk. 2 og 3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84 af 31. marts 1984 om almindelige regler for anvendelsen af den i artikel 5c i forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68 omhandlede afgift på mælk og mejeriprodukter, som ændret ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 590/85 af 26. februar 1985, skal fortolkes således, at medlemsstaterne, når de anvender formel B, ikke må lægge en del af en producents individuelle referencemængde til den nationale reserve, når producenten skifter mejeri på eget initiativ."
The provisions of Article 7(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5 c of Regulation (EEC) No. 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 590/85 of 26 February 1985, must be interpreted as meaning that they do not allow Member States under formula Β to add to the national reserve part of the individual reference quantity of a producer who of his own volition changes the dairy to which he sells.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ¿Tredje Afdeling) den 2. maj 1991
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 2 Mav 1991.
Artikel 7, stk. 3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84, som ændret ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 590/85, sammenholdt med artikel 6 i den dagældende af Kommissionen udstedte forordning (EØF) nr. 1371/84, skal fortolkes således, at den også finder anvendelse, når en opkøber træder i stedet for en anden, såfremt dette beror på producenternes eget initiativ, selv om den heraf følgende tilpasning af referencemængderne er endelig;
Article 7 (3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 857/84, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 590/85, must be interpreted, in conjunction with Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 1371/84 then in force, as meaning that it applies where one purchaser is substituted for another, including where the substitution is of the producer's own volition, even though the adjustment of the resulting reference quantities is definitive;
Gennemgangen af førstnævnte retsforskrift har intet frembragt, der kan anfægte dens gyldighed;
Consideration of the aforementioned provision has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect its validity;
Det tilkommer den nationale ret at bedømme, om en national ordning, der er indført under anvendelse af de beføjelser, der tilkommer medlemsstaterne i medfør af nævnte artikel 7, stk. 3, strider mod forbudet mod forskelsbehandling i EØF-Traktatens artikel 40, stk. 3, andet afsnit, og mod proportionalitetsprincippet. Den nationale ret må herved tage hensyn til antallet af de opkøbere, der er aktive på det pågældende marked, inklusive dem, der er etableret i andre medlemsstater, den mellem dem bestående konkurrence, og afveje fordelen for producenten ved at lade én opkøber træde i stedet for en anden (substitution), over for den efterfølgende ulempe ved at skulle foretage en tilpasning af referencemængden, samt tage hensyn til den omstændighed, om denne tilpasning gælder for alle efterfølgende substitutioner af opkøbere, uanset varigheden af den periode, hvorunder de kan ske."
It is for the national court to determine whether, in applying the prerogatives which Member States have under Article 7 (3), the national rules observe a prohibition of discrimination in the second paragraph of Article 40 (3) of the EEC Treaty and the principle of proportionality; with regard to the latter issue, it also has to take into account the number of purchasers in the market in question, including those established in other Member States, their competition inter se. to weigh a producer's benefit in having recourse to substituting purchasers against the inconvenience of adjusting
Sag C-247/89 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Portugisiske Republik
Case C-247/89: Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic
11.7.1991 ■Virksomheders rettigheder ­ manglende offentliggørelse af et offentligt indkøb" (Domstolens plenum)
11.07.1991 (Company law - Failure to publish a notice of a tendering procedure for a supply contract) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indleveret den 4. august 1989, havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Den Portugisiske Republik havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter Rådets direktiv 77/62/EØF ved ikke at have tilsendt Kontoret for De Europæiske Fællesskabers Officielle Publikationer en bekendtgørelse om et offentligt udbud fra virksomheden Aeroportos e Navegação Aérea vedrørende levering og installation af en telefoncentral i Lissabons lufthavn.
By an application lodged on 4 August 1989 the Commission brought an action for a declaration that, by not sending to the Official Publications Office of the European Communities a notice issued by Aeroportos e Navegação Aérea calling for tenders for the supply and assembly of a telephone exchange at Lisbon airport, the Portuguese Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 77/62/EEC
Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 13. marts 1901.
Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 13 March 1991.
Forenede sager C-87/90, C-88/90 og C-89/90: A. Verholen (sag C-87/90), T.H.H. Van Uetten-Van Uden (Sag C-88/90) og G.H. Heiderlijk (sag C-89/90) mod Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Amsterdam (SVBA) 11.7.1991
Joined Cases C-87/89, C-88/90 and C-89/90: A. Verholen (Case C-87/90), T.H.M. Van Wetten- Van Uden (Case C-88/90) and G.H. Heiderijk (Case C-89/90) ν Sociale Verzekeringsbank Amsterdam
(Præjudicielle) ■Socialpolitik ­ lighed mellem mænd og kvinder ­ social sikring ­ direktiv 79/7/EØF ­ tidsmæssig virkning" (Domstolens plenum)
11.07.1991 (Preliminary ruling) (Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women - Social security -Directive 79/7/EEC - Temporal scope) (Full Court)
Ved tre kendelser af 30. januar og 15. februar 1990, indgået til Domstolen den 23. marts 1990, havde Raad van Beroep, Hertogenbosch (Nederlandene) stillet en række præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF.
By three orders of 30 January and 15 February 1990, which were received at the Court on 23 March 1990, the Raad van Beroep de 'S-
Dette skete på grundlag af det antal Ir, i hvilke hans ægtefælle ikke havde varet forsikret, herunder de år, i hvilke han selv havde arbejdet i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland.
Those questions were raised in three cases between Netherlands nationals and the Sociale Verzekeringsbank Amsterdam in relation to the letter's decisions to refuse Mrs Verholen and Mrs Van Wetten-Van Uden a full pension on the ground that their husbands, who resided in the Netherlands had worked for certain periods abroad where they had been insured and to reduce Mr Heiderijk's increment of his old-age pension for a dependent spouse in relation to the years during which his spouse had not been insured, including those during which he had himself worked in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Fællesskabsretten er ikke til hinder for, at en national ret af egen drift tager stilling til, om nationale bestemmelser er forenelige med præcise og ubetingede bestemmelser i et direktiv, hvis gennemførelsesfrist er udløbet, selv om en borger ikke har påberåbt sig dette direktiv for retten.
Community law does not preclude a national court from examining of its own motion whether national legal rules comply with the precise and unconditional provisions of a directive, the period for whose implementation has elapsed, in the case where the person concerned has not relied on that directive before the national court.
Artikel 2 i Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF af 19. december 1978 om gradvis gennemførelse af princippet om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder med hensyn til social sikring skal fortolkes således, at den vedrører det personelle anvendelsesområde for dette direktiv, hvis indhold ikke kan variere afhængigt af det materielle anvendelsesområde, således som dette er defineret i artikel 3.
Article 2 of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as referring to the scope rati one personae of that directive, the content of which cannot vary according to the scope rati one materiae. under Article 3 thereof.
En borger kan for en national ret påberåbe sig bestemmelserne i direktiv 79/7, når han omfattes af en national, diskriminerende bestemmelse vedrørende hans ægtefælle, som ikke er part i sagen, dog på betingelse af, at hans ægtefælle selv er omfattet af direktivets anvendelsesområde.
An individual may rely on Directive 79/7 before a national court if he suffers the effects of discriminatory national provisions regarding his spouse, who is not a party to the proceedings, provided, however, that his spouse also comes within the scope of the directive.
Direktiv 79/7 skal fortolkes således, at det ikke tillader medlemsstaterne efter udløbet af den i artikel 8 fastsatte gennemførelsesfrist at opretholde virkningerne af en national, tidligere lovgivning, som under visse omstændigheder udelukkede gifte kvinder fra alderdomsforsikring."
Directive 79/7 must be interpreted as not allowing Member States to retain in force, after expiry of the period for implementation laid down in Article 8, the effects of earlier national legislation which excluded married women in certain circumstances from old-age insurance cover.
Generaladvokat M. Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i Domstolens plenums retsmøde den 29. maj 199l. "" " ~ "~ "~~ ~~~"" ~ ""
Mr Advocate General M. Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 29 March 1991.
Sag C-296/90: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Italienske Republik 11.7.1991
In Case C-88/90:
Generaladvokat M. Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 2.
Article 2 of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as meaning that it determines only the persons who may rely on the provisions of the directive;
"Det står under alle omstændigheder fast, at Den Italienske Republik ikke har udstedt de bestemmelser, der er nødvendige ifølge de omhandlede direktiver, hvorfor jeg foreslår Domstolen at fastslå, at der foreligger et traktatbrud, og at dømme sagsøgte til at betale sagens omkostninger".
Persons whom the national procedural rules allow to claim benefits corresponding to those referred to in Article 3 (1) and (2) of the directive may claim the benefit of the provisions of the directive and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof;
(Præjudiciel) "Virksomhedsret - offentlige indkøbsaftaler - regler om andel på 30% af offentlige indkøb forbeholdt virksomheder beliggende i Syditalien (Mezzogiorno)" (Fjerde Afdeling)
The provisions of the directive however apply only to recipients of benefits referred to in Article 3 (1) and (2) who are included in the persons referred to in Article 2;
Spørgsmålet herom var blevet rejst under en sag mellem de ovenfor nævnte parter vedrørende USL's beslutning om at udelukke selskabet Bruneau fra at deltage i en licitation vedrørende levering af suturmateriale med den begrundelse, at selskabet ikke have produktionsanlæg i Mezzogiorno.
For that purpose the national court must determine under national law which persons are entitled under an old-age pension scheme such as that established by the Algemene Ouderdomswet ;
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
In Case C-87/90:
Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 27. juni 1991. '
(Freedom of movement - Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose directives) (Full Court)
EØF-Traktatens artikel 30 skal fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter en procentandel af offentlige indkøb er forbeholdt virksomheder, der har produktionsanlæg i visse dele af det nationale område.
By failing to adopt within the prescribed period the measures necessary to implement in national law Council Directive 85/384/EEC of 10 June 1985 on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services, Council Directive 85/614/EEC of 20 December 1985 amending, on account of the accession of Spain and Portugal, Directive 85/384/EEC, and Council Directive 86/17/EEC of 27 January 1986 amending, on account of the accession of Portugal, Directive 85/384/EEC, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
(Præjudiciel) "Landbrug - fælles markedsordning for råtobak - gyldigheden af forordningerne (EØF) nr. 1114/88 og nr. 2268/88" (Femte Afdeling)
Mr Advocate General M. Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 2 July 1991.
Crispoltoni har ved Pretura nedlagt påstand om, at det statueres, at han ikke er forpligtet til at betale det ham afkrævede beløb, idet de fællesskabsbestemmelser, som tilbagebetalingskravet støttes på, er ugyldige.
"In any event it is common ground that the Italian Republic has not adopted the measures required by the directives in question and I therefore invite you to declare that it has failed to fulfil its ts obligations and to order it to pay the costs."
■Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1114/88 af 25. april 1988 ­ om andring af forordning (EØF) nr. 727/70 om oprettelse af en falles markedsordning for råtobak ­ og Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2268/88 af 19. juli 1988 ­ om fastsættelse for 1988­hØsten af målpriser, interventionspriser og præmier til købere af tobak i blade, afledte interventionspriser for tobak i baller, referencekvaliteter og produktionsområder samt de maksimale garantimængder og om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 1975/87 ­ er ugyldige, for så vidt som de fastsætter en maksimal garantimængde for tobakssorten Bright høstet i 1988."
By order of 30 May 1988, which was received at the Court on 6 December 1988, the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) referred a question to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 92 of the EEC Treaty in order to determine the compatibility with those provisions of Italian rules reserving to undertakings established in the Mezzogiorno area a percentage of public supply contracts.
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 19.
That question arose in proceedings between the abovementioned parties in relation to a decision of the Unità Sanitaria Locale to exclude Laboratori Bruneau from the procedure for a supply contract for suture material on the ground that it was not established in the Mezzogiorno.
(Præjudiciel) "Socialpolitik ­ ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder med hensyn til social sikring ­ artiklerne 2 og 4 i direktiv 79/7/EØF" (Femte Afdeling)
(Preliminary ruling) (Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Articles 2 and 4 of Directive 79/7/EEC) (Fifth Chamber)
Ved kendelse af 25. januar 1990, indgået til Domstolens Justitskontor den 31. januar 1990, havde Social Security Commissioners forelagt fire præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artiklerne 2 og 4 i Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF.
By decision of 25 January 1990, which was received at the Court Registry on 31 January 1990, the Social Security Commissioners referred four questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Articles 2 and 4 of Council Directive 79/7/EEC.
Disse spørgsmål var blevet rejst under en sag mellem de ovennævnte parter, der vedrørte Chief Adjudication Officer's afslag på at tildele sagsøgeren, Johnson, ydelsen ved alvorlig invaliditet med den begrundelse, at hun ikke hører til den personkreds, der omfattes af direktiv 79/7/EØF, idet hun frivilligt var ophørt med at arbejde for at passe sin datter, og at hun, selv om direktivet fandt anvendelse, ikke kunne opfylde betingelserne for at få ydelsen ved alvorlig invaliditet, da hun ikke kunne bevise, at hun var berettiget til invalidepension efter de regler, der gjaldt indtil ydelsen ved alvorlig invaliditet blev indført, eller at hun i det mindste havde ansøgt herom.
Those questions were raised in proceedings between the abovementioned parties concerning the Chief Adjudication Officer's refusal to grant Mrs Johnson her claim for severe disablement allowance on the ground that she did not fall within the personal scope of Directive 79/7/EEC, because she had voluntarily ceased working in order to look after her daughter and even if the directive were applicable, she did not fulfil the conditions for obtaining the severe disablement allowance since she could not show that she was entitled to the invalidity pension in force before the introduction of the severe disablement allowance or that at least she had claimed it.
Artikel 2 i Rådets direktiv 79/7/EØF af 19. december 1978 om gradvis gennemførelse af princippet om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder med
It is for the national court to determine that the person relying on Directive 79/7/EEC was actually seeking employment at the time when one of the risks specified in Article 3 (1) (a) of the directive materi al i zed.
Artikel 4 i direktiv 79/7/EØF har kunnet påberåbes fra den 23. december 1984, således at en national lov bliver retligt uvirksom, når den gør retten til en ydelse betinget af, at der forinden er indgivet ansøgning om en anden, nu afskaffet ydelse, og når den ved en af sine betingelser var diskriminerende over for kvindelige arbejdstagere.
Since 23 December 1984 it has been possible to rely on Article 4 of Directive 79/7/EEC in order to have set aside national legislation which makes entitlement to a benefit subject to the previous submission of a claim in respect of a different benefit which has since been abolished and which entailed a condition discriminating against female workers.
I mangel af passende foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af artikel 4 i direktiv 79/7/EØF har kvinder, der fortsat rammes af denne forskelsbehandling, krav på at blive behandlet på samme måde og efter samme regler som mænd i samme situation, og så længe direktivet ikke er blevet gennemført, er disse samme regler det eneste gyldige retsgrundlag."
In the absence of appropriate measures for implementing Article 4 of Directive 79/7/EEC, women placed at a disadvantage by the maintenance of the discrimination are entitled to be treated in the same manner and to have the same rules applied to them as men who are in the same situation, since, where the directive has not been implemented correctly, those rules remain the only valid point of reference."
Generaladvokat M. Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse for Femte Afdeling den 5. marts 1991.
Mr Advocate General M. Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 5 March 1991.
Han foreslog Domstolen at kende for ret:
He proposed that the Court should declare as follows: