natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det bemærkes, at i medfør af traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4, kan enhver fysisk eller juridisk person anlægge sag til prøvelse af beslutninger, der retter sig til ham, samt af beslutninger, som skønt de er udfærdiget i form af en beslutning rettet til en anden person, dog berører ham umiddelbart og individuelt.
Under the fourth paragraph of 173 of the Treaty, any natural or legal person may institute proceedings for the annulment of a decision addressed to that person or of a decision which, although in the form of a decision addressed to another person, is of direct and individual concern to the former.
I den foreliggende sag er den omtvistede beslutning formelt rettet til VEB.
In the present case the contested decision! was formally addressed to the VEB.
I den foreliggende sag skulle Retten derfor have efterprøvet, om den omtvistede beslutning i sig selv havde indvirkning på appellantens retsstilling, når det blev taget i betragtning, at de kompetente russiske myndigheder ikke havde noget skøn med hensyn til, om kontrakten skulle
It is thus clear that the contested decision whereby the Commission, in the exercise of its powers, refused to approve the addendum to the supply contract between Exportkhleb and Glencore deprived the latter of any real possibility of performing the contract awarded to it, or of obtaining payment for supplies made thereunder.
gennemføres på de af parterne aftalte vilkår i kontrakttillægget, som Kommissionen havde gjort indsigelse imod, selv om de derved måtte give afkald på fællesskabsfinansiering.
The appeal is therefore well founded in so far as it relates to the dismissal as inadmissible of the action for annulment by the contested judgment,
Det følger heraf, at Retten har anlagt en urigtig retlig bedømmelse ved at fastslå, at appellanten på baggrund af de faktiske omstændigheder, Retten har lagt lil grund, ikke var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning i traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4's forstand.
'I. Annuls the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 1996 in Case T491/93 Richco ν Commission inasmuch as it dismisses as inadmissible the action for annulment brought by Glencore Grain Ltd, formerly trading as Richco Commodities Ltd.
•1) Den af Retten i Første Instans afsagte dom af 24. september 1996 i sag T-491/93, Richco mod Kommissionen, ophæves, for så vidt angår afvisningen af den af Glencore Grain Ltd, tidligere Richco Commodities Ltd, nedlagte annullationspåstand.
Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance for judgment on the substance.
Generaladvokat A. La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 16. december 1997.
Advocate General A. La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 16 December 1997.
»- ophæve Rettens domme af 24. september 1996 i sagerne T-485/93, T-491/93, T-494/93 og T-509/93, for så vidt som Retten herved afviste de sager, der var anlagt af henholdsvis Louis Dreyfus, Compagnie Continentale og Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 1. april 1993, og af Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 12. juli 1993, og fastslå, at sagerne bør antages til realitetsbehandling; hjemvise nærværende sager til Retten«.
Annul the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 1996 in Cases T-485/93, T491/93, T-494793 and T-509/93, in so far as they declare inadmissible the actions brought by Dreyfus, Continentale and Glencore for annulment of the decision of 1 April 1993, and by Glencore for annulment of the decision of 12 July 1993, and declare those actions admissible, and refer the cases back to the Court of First Instance.'
Sag C-404/96 Glencore Grain Ltd / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
(Emergency assistance given by the Community to the States of the former Soviet Union — Loan — Documentary credit Action for annulment —Admissibility — 'Directly concerned') (Full Court) measure is purely theoretical and their intention to act in conformity with it is not in doubt.
»Nødhjælp fra Fællesskabet til staterne i det tidligere Sovjetunionen lån remburs annullationssøgsmål -formaliteten — kravel om, at sagsøgeren skal være umiddelbart berørt« (Domstolens plenum)
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 23 December 1996, Glencore Grain Ltd, formerly trading as Richco Commodities Ltd (hereinafter 'Glencore' or 'the appellant') brought an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-509/93 Richco ν Commission [1996] ECR Π­Ι 181, (hereinafter 'the contested judgment'), dismissing as inadmissible its action for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 12 July 1993 addressed to the State Export-Import Bank of Ukraine.
Det fremgår af Domstolens praksis, at for at en sagsøger kan anses for at være umiddelbart berørt, skal den anfægtede fællesskabsforanstaltning umiddelbart have indvirkning på den pågældendes retsstilling, og foranstaltningen må ikke overlade et skøn til adressaterne, der skal gennemføre den, men gennemførelsen skal ske helt automatisk, udelukkende i medfør af fællesskabsretsreglerne og uden anvendelse af andre mellemkommende regler.
The findings of the Court of First Instance contain objective, relevant and consistent grounds for concluding that the appellant was directly concerned by the contested decision.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 23. december 1996 har Glencore Grain Ltd, tidligere Richco Commodities Ltd (herefter »appellanten«) for Domstolen iværksat appel af dom afsagt den 24. september 19% af De Europæiske Fællesskabers Ret i Første Instans i sagen Richco mod Kommissionen, (herefter »dommen« eller »den appellerede dom«), hvorved Retten afviste sagen, for så vidt angik påstanden om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 12. juli 1993 rettet til State Export-Import Bank of Ukraine (herefter »SEIB«).
The appellant criticises the Court of First Instance for departing from the settled case-law of the Court of Justice, and of the Court of First Instance itself, in holding that the applicant was not directly concerned by the contested decision.
Det samme gælder, når adressaterne kun har en rent teoretisk mulighed for at undlade at efterkomme fællesskabsretsakter, og der ikke er nogen tvivl om, at de vil give retsakten virkninger efter dens indhold.
It is thus clear that the contested decision deprived Glencore of any real possibility of performing the contract awarded to it, or of obtaining payment for supplies made thereunder.
Appellanten har gjort gældende, at Retten har fraveget fast retspraksis ved Domstolen og ved Retten selv ved at fastslå, at appellanten ikke var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning.
Consequently, although the contested decision was addressed to the SEIB, as financial agent of the Ukraine, it directly affected the appellant's legal situation.
I den foreliggende sag skulle Retten derfor have efterprøvet, om den omtvistede beslutning i sig selv havde indvirkning på appellantens retsstilling, når det blev taget i betragtning, at de kompetente ukrainske myndigheder ikke havde noget skøn med hensyn til, om kontrakten skulle gennemføres på de af parterne aftalte vilkår, som Kommissionen havde gjort indsigelse imod, selv om de derved måtte give afkald på fællesskabsfinansiering.
The Court of First Instance therefore erred in law in taking the view, in the light of the facts as found by it, that the appellant was not directly concerned, within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty, by the contested decision.
I den foreliggende sag er den omtvistede beslutning formelt rettet til SEIB.
The Court of First Instance dealt only with the question whether the applicant was directly concerned by the contested decision, since the Commission had not denied that the applicant was individually concerned.
En række objektive, relevante og samstemmende oplysninger, som Retten har lagt til grund, viser, at appellanten var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning.
The appeal is therefore well founded in so far as it relates to the dismissal as inadmissible of the action for annulment by the contested judgment.
Det fremgår således, at den omtvistede beslutning fratog appellanten enhver faktisk
The Court's case-law shows that, for a person to be directly concerned by a Community measure, the latter must directly affect the legal situation of the individual and leave no discretion to the addressees of that measure who are entrusted with the task of implementing it, such implementation being purely automatic and resulting from Community rules without the application of other intermediate rules.
Retten har kun taget stilling til spørgsmålet, om appellanten var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning, da Kommissionen ikke havde bestridt, at appellanten var individuelt berørt.
The same applies where the possibility for addressees not to give effect to the Community
retlig bedømmelse ved at fastslå, at appellanten på baggrund af de faktiske omstændigheder, Retten har lagt til grund, ikke var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning i traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4's forstand,
Annuls the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 1996 in Case T-509/93 Richco ν Commission inasmuch as it dismisses as inadmissible the action for annulment brought by Glencore Grain Ltd, formerly trading as Richco Commodities Ltd.
Selv om den omtvistede beslutning var rettet til SEIB i dennes egenskab af Ukraines finansielle institution, findes den herefter umiddelbart at have påvirket appellantens retsstilling.
Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance for judgment on the substance.
Det følger heraf, at Retten har anlagt en urigtig for så vidt angår annullationspåstanden.
Advocate General A. La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 16 December 1997.
•1) Den af Retten i Første Instans afsagte dom af 24. september 1996 i sag T-509/93, Richco mod Kommissionen, ophæves, for så vidt angår afvisningen af den af Glencore Grain Ltd, tidligere Richco Commodities Ltd, nedlagte annuäationspåstand.
Annul the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 1996 in Cases T-485/93, T491/93, T-494793 and T-509/93, in so far as they declare inadmissible the actions brought by Dreyfus, Continentale and Glencore for annulment of the decision of 1 April 1993, and by Glencore for annulment of the decision of 12 July 1993, and declare those actions admissible, and refer the cases back to the Court of First Instance.'
2) Sagen hjemvises til Retten i Første Instans til afgørelse i realiteten.
Joined Cases C-52/97 to C-54/97 Epifanio Viscido and Others ν Ente Poste Italiane State aid
Generaladvokat A. La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 16. december 1997.
Preliminary ruling (Aid granted by Member States — Meaning — National law providing that only one public utility is relieved of the obligation of observing a rule of general application relating to fixedterm employment contracts) (Fourth Chamber) interpretation of Articles 92(1) and 93 of that Treaty.
Han foreslog Domstolen at ophæve Rettens domme af 24. september 19% i sagerne T-485/93, T-491/93, T-494/93 og T-509/93, for så vidt som Retten herved afviste de sager, der var anlagt af henholdsvis Louis Dreyfus, Compagnie Continentale og Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 1. april 1993, og af Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 12. juli 1993, og fastslå, at sagerne bør antages til realitetsbehandling;
By three orders of 3 February 1997, received at the Court Registry on 7 February 1997, the Pretura Circondariale (District Magistrate's Court), Trento, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling four questions on the
- hjemvise nærværende sager til Retten«.
The plaintiffs object to the fact that Ente Poste Italiane recruited them on the basis of fixedterm
Forenede sager C-52/97 C-54/97 Epifanio Viscido m.fl. / Ente Poste Italiane Statsstøtte
contracts. They claim that such contracts should be deemed to have been converted into contracts of indeterminate duration.
Præjudiciel »Statsstøtte — begreb national lov, hvorefter kun én enkelt offentlig erhvervsøkonomisk virksomhed er fritaget for at følge en almindelig bestemmelse om ansættelse af personale på bestemt tid* (Fjerde Afdeling)
By its first question the national court asks essentially whether a national provision relieving only one undertaking of the obligation of complying with the generally applicable legislation concerning fixedterm contracts constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty.
Ved tre kendelser af 3. februar 1997, indgået til Domstolen den 7. februar 1997, har Pretura circondariale di Trento forelagt Domstolen fire præjudiciellespørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af traktatens artikel 92, stk. 1, og artikel 93.
In this case, it must be observed that nonapplication of generally applicable legislation concerning fixedterm employment contracts to a single undertaking does not involve any direct or indirect transfer of State resources to that undertaking.
Sagsøgerne har over for Ente Poste Italiane rejst kritik af, at de er ansat i henhold til arbejdsaftaler om ansættelse på bestemt tid. De har gjort gældende, at disse aftaler må anses for at være ændret til aftaler om ansættelse på ubestemt tid.
The national court observes that, since Ente Poste Italiane is under no obligation to conclude employment contracts of indeterminate duration, it enjoys a flexibility not available to other undertakings operating in the same sector.
Den sondring, der i denne bestemmelse foretages mellem »statsstøtte« og »støtte, som ydes ved hjælp af statsmidler«, betyder nemlig ikke, at alle de fordele, der indrømmes af en stat, udgør støtte, uanset om de er finansieret ved hjælp af statsmidler eller ej.
It follows that a provision of the kind at issue in the main proceedings does not constitute a means of directly or indirectly granting an advantage through State resources.
Med det første spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt at få oplyst, om en national bestemmelse, hvorefter en enkelt virksomhed er fritaget for at overholde generelle bestemmelser om kontrakter om ansættelse på bestemt tid, udgør en statsstøtte som omhandlet i traktatens artikel 92, stk. 1.
In that connection, it should be pointed out that only advantages granted directly or indirectly through State resources are to be considered as aid within the meaning of Article 92(1). The distinction made in that provision between 'aid
Den forelæggende ret har anført, at Ente Poste Italiane, når virksomheden ikke er forpligtet til at ansætte personale på ubestemt tid, opnår en fleksibilitet i forhold til virksomheder, der arbejder i samme sektor.
'A national provision which relieves only one undertaking of the obligation of complying with the generally applicable legislation concerning fixedterm employment contracts does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty. '
En bestemmelse som den, der er omtvistet i hovedsagen, er således ikke et middel til direkte eller indirekte at yde fordele ved hjælp af statsmidler.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 19 February 1998.
•En national bestemmelse, hvorefter en enkelt virksomhed er fritaget for at overholde generelle bestemmelser om kontrakter om ansættelse af personale på bestemt tid, udgør ikke støtte som omhandlet i EF-traktatens artikel 92, stk. 1.*
'A national provision which relieves an undertaking from the obligation of complying with the generally applicable legislation concerning the duration of employment contracts does not entail the grant of State aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty.'
»En national bestemmelse, der fritager en virksomhed fra forpligtelsen til at overholde en generel ordning vedrørende arbejdskontrakters varighed, er ikke udtryk for en statsstøtte i henhold til traktatens artikel 92, stk. 1.«
By order of 8 February 1996, the Bundessozialgericht (Federal Social Court) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Articles 6 and 78 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983 (hereinafter 'the Regulation'), and of Articles 48 and 51 of the EC Treaty.
7. maj 1998 arbejdstagere ydelser til børn, der har mistet en eller begge
By application of 7 November 1994 they appealed on a point of law to the Bundessozialgericht.
Præjudiciel »Social sikring af vandrende forældre« (Femte Afdeling)
Those questions were raised in proceedings brought by Manuela Gómez Rodríguez and Gregorio Gómez Rodríguez against the Landesvcrsicherungsanstalt Rheinprovinz (Regional Insurance Office, Rheinprovinz; hereinafter 'the Landesversicherungsanstalt') concerning the grant of orphans' pensions.
Tyskland som i Spanien, hvor han som arbejdstager tilbagelagde forsikringsperioder på henholdsvis 56 og 80 måneder.
Their father, a Spanish national, had been insured as an employed person for 56 months in Germany and 80 months in Spain.
I februar 1995 afgik han ved døden i Spanien uden at have fået udbetalt nogen pension.
In February 1985 he died in Spain without having drawn a pension.
Med virkning fra den 1. januar 1986 tildelte den spanske pensionsforsikringsinstitution de to sagsøgere i hovedsagen efterladtepension indtil det fyldte 18. år, på hvilket tidspunkt deres ret hertil ophørte efter spansk lovgivning.
The Spanish pension insurance institution thus granted orphans' pensions to the claimants from 1 January 1986 until they reached the age of 18, the age at which their entitlement to orphans' pension came to an end under Spanish law.
Herefter anmodede Manuela Gómez Rodríguez og Gregorio Gómez Rodríguez Landesversicherungsanstalt om at få tildelt efterladtepension i henhold til tysk lovgivning, hvorefter en efterladtepension kan ydes indtil det fyldte 25. år for unge under uddannelse.
By its first question the national court essentially asks whether, on a proper construction of Article 78(2)(b) of the Regulation, Article 78(2)(b)(ii) becomes applicable in circumstances where a right to orphans' pension, which initially arose under Article 78(2)(b)(i) in the Member State in which the recipient resides, has been lost by reason of the attainment of an agelimit, while in another Member State, whose legislation was also applicable to the insured person, a right to orphans' pension would run beyond that date on application of the rule on aggregation laid down in Article 79 of the Regulation.
nogen ret til tildeling af efterladtepension efter tysk lovgivning, når udbetalingen af den spanske pension er ophørt, så meget mindre som den afdøde arbejdstager ikke havde tilbagelagt den nødvendige karensperiode på 60 måneder, hvorfor betingelserne for at oppebære pensionen ikke var opfyldt.
advantages for workers which would result from the inapplicability, following the entry into force of the Regulation, of a bilateral social security convention.
kompetent til at tildele ydelser til efterladte børn, navnlig når den afdøde arbejdstager har været omfattet af lovgivningen i flere medlemsstater.
entitlement was acquired in this case solely on the basis of periods of insurance completed in Germany, so that applying the Regulation, under which the State of residence is competent, does not deprive the persons concerned of entitlements acquired under the laws of another Member State alone.
Virkningen af, at en medlemsstat udpeges som kompetent er. at kun lovgivningen i denne medlemsstat kommer til anvendelse i overensstemmelse med princippet i forordningens artikel 13, stk. 1, om, at de af forordningen omfattede personer alene er undergivet lovgivningen i én medlemsstat.
The Court ruled in Rònfeldt that Articles 48(2) and 51 of the EC Treaty had to be interpreted as precluding the loss of social security advantages for the workers concerned which would result from the inapplicability, following the entry into force of the Regulation, of conventions operating between two or more Member States and incorporated in their national law.
Ved appelskrift af 7. november 1994 indgav sagsøgerne derpå revisionsanke ved Bundessozialgericht.
Furthermore, the mere fact that the benefit covered by Article 78(2)(b)(i) comes to an end in the State of residence because an age-limit is reached, terminating entitlement to the benefit generally, does not render Article 78(2)(b)(ii) applicable.
I den forbindelse skal det fremhæves, som Domstolen flere gange har udtalt, at medlemsstaterne er enekompetente til at fastsætte niveauet for de ydelser, som de tildeler, og disses varighed.
In Thévenon the Court stated that the circumstances in Rònfeldt were specific in nature and not present in a case such as the one before it, where the insured person had not exercised his right to freedom of movement until after the entry into force of the Regulation, that is to say after the bilateral convention had already been replaced by the Regulation.
Herefter kan den omstændighed, at udbetalingen af ydelser i henhold til lovgivningen i den medlemsstat, der er kompetent efter artikel 78, stk. 2, litra b), nr. i), er ophørt, fordi modtageren ikke længere opfylder aldersbetingelsen for tildeling af den pågældende ydelse, ikke medføre, at en anden medlemsstat bliver kompetent vedrørende den samme risiko i kraft af en anden tilknytningsfaktor i artikel 78, stk. 2.
The purpose of Article 78(2) of the Regulation is to determine the competent State for the grant of orphans' benefit, in particular where the deceased was subject to the legislation of several Member States. As a result of that determination, the legislation of a single Member State applies, in accordance with the principle to that effect set out in Article 13(1) of the Regulation.
Når den ret til ydelser, som er erhvervet i bopælsstaten, er bortfaldet, fordi den pågældende har nået en bestemt alder, er den kompetente institution i en anden medlemsstat ikke forpligtet til at tildele den pågældende ydelser, medmindre denne har erhvervet ret dertil udelukkende på grundlag af de forsikringsperioder, som er tilbagelagt i denne stat.
The appellants' father completed his periods of insurance in Spain and Germany before the accession of the Kingdom of Spain to the European Communities and the rule identified in Rònfeldt, as clarified in Thévenon, is therefore applicable in principle.
Det må fastslås, at der ikke findes grundlag i Domstolens praksis vedrørende tillægsydelser for en ret til tyske ydelser i et tilfælde som det, der foreligger i hovedsagen.
Accordingly, the fact that benefits ceased to be paid under the legislation of the Member State specified by Article 78(2)(b)(i) because the recipient no longer satisfied the age-limit conditions for their grant cannot result in another Member State becoming competent in respect of the same risk by recourse to another connecting factor contained in Article 78(2).
I den foreliggende sag er der nemlig ikke erhvervet nogen ret til tyske ydelser udelukkende på grundlag af de forsikringsperioder, som er tilbagelagt i Tyskland, hvorfor anvendelsen af forordningens bestemmelser, hvorefter bopælsstaten har kompetencen, ikke berøver de pågældende de rettigheder, som er erhvervet udelukkende i henhold til en anden medlemsstats lovgivning.
Since a comparison has already been made between the advantages resulting from the convention and those resulting from the Regulation, whose outcome was that the arrangements under the Regulation were more favourable for the appellants, the principle identified in Rònfeldt cannot be applied.