natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sag C-38/93: Kommanditgesellschaft H. J. Gl awe Spiel- und Unterhaltungsgeräte Aufstellungsges. mbH & Co. mod Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst Præjudiciel - Finanzgericht Hamburg - fortolkning af artikel 11, punkt A, stk. 1, litra a), og artikel 3, litra b), i Rådets sjette direktiv 77/388/EØF af 17. maj 1977 om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter - Det Fælles Merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag - fastlæggelse af beskatningsgrundlaget for spilleautomater med mulighed for at vinde penge - indsatserne med eller uden fradrag af de udbetalte gevinster - begrebet bonus
"The United Kingdom has failed on the following grounds to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the EC Treaty and Council Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses: its failure to provide measures enabling workers' representatives to be designated with a view to the application of the directive in cases where an employer is not prepared voluntarily to recognize such representatives (first complaint); its exclusion of certain undertakings from the scope of the directive (third complaint); its failure to require a transferor or a transferee who envisages measures in relation to his employees and is under an obligation to consult the representatives of his employees to do so with a view to seeking agreement (fourth complaint); and its failure to provide for sufficiently effective and deterrent sanctions in the case of failure by an employer to inform and consult workers' representatives as required by the directive (fifth complaint).
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i Sjette Afdeling den 3. marts 1994.
I propose that for the rest the Court should dismiss the Commission's application and that it should order each party to bear its own costs in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 69(3) of the Rules of Procedure."
Generaladvokaten foreslog Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
Case C-383/92 Commission ν United Kingdom
Sag C-44/94: The Queen mod Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, ex parte: National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations m.fl. Præjudiciel - High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) - fortolkning af Kommissionens beslutning 92/593/EØF om et flerårigt udviklingsprogram for Det Forenede Kongeriges fiskerflåde (1993-1996) i medfør af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4028/86 - en medlemsstats begrænsning i det antal dage, fiskerfartøjer med en længde over 10 meter kan være på havet
"The United Kingdom has failed on the following grounds to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the Treaty and Council Directive 75/129/EEC of 17 February 1975 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies: its failure to provide measures enabling workers' representatives to be designated with a view to the application of the directive in cases where an employer is not prepared voluntarily to recognize such representatives (first complaint); its limitation of the scope of the legislation designed to implement the directive to a more restricted definition of collective redundancies than that envisaged by the directive (second complaint); its failure to require an employer who is contemplating collective redundancies and is required to consult workers' representatives to do so with a view to reaching an agreement and to require such consultation at least to cover the matters specified in the directive (third complaint); and its failure to provide for sufficiently effective and deterrent sanctions In the case of failure by an employer to consult workers' representatives as required by the directive (fourth complaint)."
Præjudiciel - Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía - fortolkning af artikel 25, stk. 2, i tiltrædelsesakten for Spanien samt bestemmelserne i EF- og EKSF-traktaterne vedrørende frie varebevægelser i forhold til en af Ceuta kommune opkrævet afgift - intern beskatning, som i det væsentlige rammer indførte varer, mens den lokale produktion stort set ikke pålægges afgifter
Preliminary ruling - Finanzgericht Hamburg - Interpretation of Article 11(A)(1)(a) and (3)(b) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment - Definition of the taxable amount in respect of turnover derived from gaming machines offering the possibility of winning - Stakes inserted with or without deduction of winnings paid out - Concept of refund
Sag C-46/94: Anklagemyndigheden mod Michèle Voisine (født Delaunay)
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 3 March 1994.
Præjudiciel - Tribunal de police de Bordeaux - fortolkning af artikel 38 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2392/89 om fastsættelse af almindelige regler for betegnelse og præsentation af vin og druemost - begrebet etikette -påføring af dekoration eller reklame, som er uden relation til selve vinen
"Article 11 A(l)(a) of the Sixth VAT Directive must be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State subjects to VAT supplies of services consisting in the making available of gaming machines offering the
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 93/659/EØF om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1990, der er finansieret af EUGFL, Garantisektionen - mælk - referencemængder for Italien, Spanien og Grækenland
17 - possibility of winning money, the taxable amount in respect of such supplies over a given period does not Include that proportion of the total stakes inserted which corresponds to the winnings paid out to successful players during that period."
Delvis annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 93/659/EØF om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1990, der er finansieret af EUGFL, Garantisektionen - mælk og mejeriprodukter - tillægsafgift for mælk og mejeriprodukter - godtgørelse for midlertidig suspension i henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 775/87, som ændret ved forordning nr. 1116/89 og nr. 3882/89 "
Preliminary ruling - High court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) -Interpretation of Commission Decision on a multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of the United Kingdom for the period 1993 to 1996 pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 - Restriction by Member State on days at sea spent by fishing vessels over 10 metres y Navegación de Ceuta ν
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 93/659/EØF om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1990, der er finansieret af EUGFL, Garantisektionen - tillægsafgift på mælk ikke opkrævet
Preliminary ruling - Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía -Interpretation of Article 25(2) of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Spain to the European Communities and of provisions of the EC and ECSC Treaties concerning free movement of goods with regard to a charge levied by the municipality of Ceuta - Internal taxation affecting essentially imported goods and providing exemptions for most domestic products
Præjudiciel - Pretura circondariale di Macerata - fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 90/642/EØF om fastsættelse af maksimalgrænseværdier for pesticidrester på og i visse produkter af vegetabilsk oprindelse, herunder frugt og grøntsager - spørgsmålet om direktivet omfatter ukrudtsbekæmpelsesmidler -analysemetode for kartofler
Preliminary ruling - Tribunal de Police, Bordeaux - Interpretation of Article 38 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2392/89 of 24 July 1989 laying down general rules for the description and presentation of wines and grape musts - Concept of label - Decoration or advertisements having no link with the wine itself
Præjudiciel - Consiglio Nazionale Forense - fortolkning af Rådets direktiv 77/249/EØF om lettelser med henblik på den faktiske gennemførelse af advokaters frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser - forbud mod at udenlandske advokater opretter en principal eller sekundær praksis i Italien
Annulment of Commission Decision 93/659/EEC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1990 of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section -Milk products sector - Reference quantities for Italy, Spain and Greece
Præjudiciel - Tribunale di Piacenza - fortolkning og gyldigheden af artikel 1, stk. 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 668/93 om begrænset ydelse af producentstøtte for produkter forarbejdet på basis af tomater - metode til fordeling af støtten mellem forskellige forarbejdningsvirksomheder hvorved en af dem begunstiges - eventuelt fejlagtig formulering
Preliminary ruling - Sø- og Handelsretten - Interpretation of Council Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses - Transfer of part of building works
Traktatbrud - Rådets direktiv 71/305/EØF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne med hensyn til indgåelse af offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter -afslutning af en kontrakt underhånden og manglende offentliggørelse af udbudsbekendtgørelse i EFT vedrørende en sagkyndig udtalelse om bygningen af motortrafikvejsstrækningen Ascoli-Mare
Annulment of Commission Decision 93/659/EEC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1990 of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section -Animal feed, olive oil and tobacco sector
Sag C-58/94: Nederlandene mod Rådet
Case C-51/94 Commission ν Germany
Annullation af Rådets afgørelse 93/731/EF om aktindsigt i Rådets dokumenter, af artikel 22 i Rådets afgørelse 93/662/EF om vedtagelse af Rådets forretningsorden samt af adfærdskodeks for aktindsigt i Rådets og Kommissionens dokumenter af 6. december 1993
Failure of Member state to fulfil its obligations - Articles 30 and following of EEC Treaty et seq. and Article 5, 6 and 16 of Council Directive 79/112/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for sale to the ultimate consumer - Obligation to make the name under which the product is sold subject to adequate information to point out the difference in composition in relation to the compulsory (or usual) recipe in the Member State of final consumption -"Egg-free Hollandaise sauce with vegetable fat"
Traktatbrud - EØF-traktatens artikel 48 og artikel 1 og 3 i Rådets for ordning (EØF) nr. 1612/68 om arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed inden for Fællesskabet - beskæftigelse for sømænd om bord på fartøjer, som sejler under italiensk flag, forbeholdt italienske statsborgere
Partial annulment of Commission Decision 93/659/EEC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1990 of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section - Milk products sector - Additional levy in the milk and milk product sector - Compensatory allowance for temporary suspension provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 775/87 as amended by Regulations (EEC) No 1116/89 and 3882/89
Sag C-61/94: Kommissionen mod Tyskland
Case C-53/94 Spain ν Commission
Traktatbrud - EF-traktatens artikel 228, stk. 7, og Rådets afgørelse 80/271/EØF om indgåelse af de multilaterale aftaler, der er resultatet af handelsforhandlingerne 1973-79 - internationalt arrangement vedrørende mejerisektoren - manglende anvendelse af de aftalte minimumspriser i forbindelse med aktiv forædling
Annulment of Commission Decision 93/659/EEC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1990 of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section -Additional levy in the milk sector not collected
Sag C-62/94 P: M. Turner mod Kommissionen
Case C-54/94 U
Tjenestemandssag - appel af Rettens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 16. december 1993 i sag T-80/92
Preliminary ruling Pretura circondariale di Macerata - Interpretation of Council Directive 77/549/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables - Whether herbicides come within scope - Method of analysis in respect of potatoes
Præjudiciel - Tribunal de commerce de Mons - fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 30 i forhold til en national lovgivning indeholdende et forbud mod tabsgivende salg
Preliminary ruling - Tribunal de Commerce, Mons - Interpretation of Article 30 of the EEC Treaty with regard to a national law prohibiting sale at a loss
(se sag C-59/94)
(See Case C-59/94)
Domstolen afholder generelle udvælgelsesprøver
GENERAL COMPETITIONS ORGANIZED BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE
De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol afholder generelle udvælgelsesprøver på grundlag af kvalifikationsbeviser og prøver med henblik på ansættelse af ledere af den finske, den norske og den svenske oversættelsesafdeling.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities is organizing general competitions based on qualifications and tests in order to recruit Heads of the Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish Translation Divisions.
Ansøgningerne skal være indgivet til Domstolen senest den 22. april 1994.
The closing date for submitting applications is 22 April 1994.
Den fulde ordlyd af meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøve samt det obligatoriske ansøgningsskema tilsendes ved skriftlig henvendelse til:
The complete text of the notice of competition as well as the mandatory application form may be obtained by writing to:
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet den 4.3.1994
Original version (French) completed on 4 March 1994
Ugen 7.-11. marts 1994
7 to 11 March 1994 No 08/94 CONTENTS page
Sag C-188/92 TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH mod Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland
JUDGMENTS Court of Justice Case C-188/92 TUD Textilwerke
Sag C-291/93 Kommissionen mod Den Italienske Republik Miljø og forbrugere
Deutschi and State aids Case C-291/93 Commission ν Italian Environment and consumers
Sag C-328/92 Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Spanien
Case C-353/92 Greece ν Council
Sag C-353/92 Den Hellenske Republik mod Rådet
Case C-385/92 Greece ν Council
Sag C-385/92 Den Hellenske Republik mod Kommissionen
Case C-313/93 Commission ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Sag C-188/92 TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH mod Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland
Case C-188/92 TUD Textilwerke
Præjudiciel "Statsstøtte - sag anlagt til prøvelse af interne foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af en kommissionsbeslutning - præjudiciel forelæggelse -beslutningens endelighed i forhold til støttemodtageren - vurdering af gyldighed" (Domstolens plenum)
(Preliminary ruling) (State aid -- Action against internal measures implementing a Commission decision -- Preliminary reference -- Definitive nature of the decision vis-à-vis the recipient of the aid to which it relates -- Assessment of validity) (Full Court)
Ved kendelse af 18. marts 1992, indgået til Domstolen den 12. maj s.a., havde Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende endeligheden af Kommissionens beslutning 86/509/EØF om støtte ydet af Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og Land Bayern til en producent af polyamid- og polyestergarn i Deggendorf i forhold til støttemodtageren efter udløbet af søgsmålsfristen i EØF-traktatens artikel 173, stk. 3, samt vedrørende gyldigheden af denne beslutning.
By order of 18 March 1992, which was received at the Court on 12 May 1992, the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling two questions on the definitive nature of Commission Decision 86/509/EEC on aid granted by the Federal Republic of Germany and the Land of Bavaria to a producer of polyamide and polyester yarn situated in Deggendorf vis-à-vis the recipient of the aid to which it relates, after the expiry of the time-limit prescribed by the third paragraph of Article 173 of the EEC Treaty for bringing an action, and on the validity of that decision.
Ved denne beslutning rettet til Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland fastslog Kommissionen, at støtten til TWD var ydet i strid med bestemmelserne i traktatens artikel 93, stk. 3, og derfor var ulovlig.
By that decision the Commission declared that the aid granted to TWD had been granted in contravention of Article 93(3) of the Treaty and was consequently unlawful.
Den erklærede endvidere støtten for uforenelig med fællesmarkedet efter EØF-traktatens artikel 92.
It declared that that aid was also incompatible with the common market by virtue of Article 92 of the EEC Treaty.
Den pålagde derfor Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland at kræve støtten tilbagebetalt.
It accordingly requested the Federal Republic of Germany to recover the aid.
Det for den nationale ret opståede problem var, om sagsøgeren under de retlige og faktiske omstændigheder, der foreligger i hovedsagen, var afskåret fra at påberåbe sig ulovligheden af den pågældende beslutning til støtte for et søgsmål anlagt til prøvelse af den forvaltningsakt, hvorved den nationale myndighed til gennemførelse af Kommissionens beslutning har tilbagekaldt de attester, der udgjorde det retlige grundlag for de tilskud, sagsøgeren har modtaget.
The issue before the national court is whether or not, in the factual and legal circumstances of the main proceedings, the applicant is time-barred from pleading the unlawfulness of the Commission's decision in support of an action brought against the administrative act by which the national authority, in implementation of the Commission's decision, revoked the certificates which formed the legal basis for the aid which it had received.
Den nationale ret fremhævede, at Kommissionens beslutning ikke var blevet anfægtet af sagsøgeren i hovedsagen som modtager af den støtte, der var genstand for beslutningen, selv om Forbundsøkonomiministeriet havde fremsendt en kopi af beslutningen til sagsøgeren og udtrykkeligt havde gjort opmærksom på, at sagsøgeren kunne anlægge sag til prøvelse af beslutningen ved EF-Domstolen.
The national court emphasizes that the Commission's decision was not challenged by the applicant in the main proceedings, the recipient of the aid with which the decision was concerned, although a copy of that decision had been sent to it by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and that Ministry had explicitly informed it that it could bring an action against that decision before the Court of Justice.
Det bemærkedes endvidere, at en virksomhed, der er modtager af individuel støtte, som er genstand for en kommissionsbeslutning vedtaget i medfør af traktatens artikel 93, har ret til at anlægge annullationssøgsmål i henhold til traktatens artikel 173, stk. 2, selv om beslutningen er rettet til en medlemsstat.
The Court recalled that the undertaking in receipt of individual aid which is the subject-matter of a Commission decision adopted on the basis of Article 93 of the Treaty has the right to bring an action for annulment under the second paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty even if the decision is addressed to a Member State.
Imidlertid fører de samme krav om retssikkerhed til at afskære en modtager af støtte, der er genstand for en beslutning vedtaget af Kommissionen i henhold til traktatens artikel 93, fra at anfægte beslutningens lovlighed ved de nationale domstole i forbindelse med et søgsmål til prøvelse af de nationale myndigheders foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af denne beslutning, når støttemodtageren kunne have anfægtet beslutningen, men har ladet den bindende frist i traktatens artikel 173, stk. 3, udløbe.
It follows from the same requirements of legal certainty that it is not possible for a recipient of aid, forming the subject-matter of a Commission decision adopted on the basis of Article 93 of the Treaty, who could have challenged that decision and who allowed the mandatory time-limit laid down in this regard by the third paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty to expire, to call in question the lawfulness of that decision before the national courts in an action brought against the measures taken by the national authorities for implementing that decision.
Hvis man anerkendte, at vedkommende under sådanne omstændigheder ved den nationale ret kunne modsætte sig gennemførelsen af beslutningen under påberåbelse af, at den var ulovlig, ville det svare til at give den pågældende adgang til at omgå beslutningens endelighed i forhold til ham efter søgsmålsfristernes udløb.
To accept that in such circumstances the person concerned could challenge the implementation of the decision in proceedings before the national court on the ground that the decision was unlawful would in effect enable the person concerned to overcome the definitive nature which the decision assumes as against that person once the time-limit for bringing an action has expired.
"Den nationale ret er bundet af en beslutning, som Kommissionen har vedtaget i henhold til EØF-traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, når der ved denne ret i forbindelse med de nationale myndigheders gennemførelse af beslutningen anlægges et søgsmål af støttemodtageren, som er adressat for gennemførelsesforanstaltningerne, hvorunder denne gør gældende, at Kommissionens beslutning er ulovlig, og når støttemodtageren, selv om medlemsstaten havde underrettet denne skriftligt om Kommissionens beslutning, ikke har anlagt sag til prøvelse af beslutningen i henhold til traktatens artikel 173, stk. 2, eller ikke har anlagt sag inden for den fastsatte frist."
"The national court is bound by a Commission decision adopted under Article 93(2) of the Treaty where, in view of the implementation of that decision by the national authorities, the recipient of the aid to which the implementation measures are addressed brings before it an action in which it pleads the unlawfulness of the Commission's decision and where that recipient of aid, although informed in writing by the Member State of the Commission's decision, did not bring an action against that decision under the second paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty, or did not do so within the period prescribed."
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 15. september 1993.
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 15 September 1993.
"Når Kommissionen i henhold til EØF-traktatens artikel 93, stk. 2, første afsnit, har rettet en beslutning til en medlemsstat, hvorved denne pålægges at kræve statsstøtte, som medlemsstaten ulovligt har ydet en virksomhed, tilbagebetalt, og når den pågældende virksomhed ikke har anlagt sag til prøvelse af denne beslutning i henhold til traktatens artikel 173 inden den fastsatte frist, kan spørgsmålet om beslutningens gyldighed ikke gøres gældende under en retssag ved de nationale domstole, som virksomheden anlægger til prøvelse af de foranstaltninger, som medlemsstaten træffer med henblik på tilbagebetaling af støtten."
"Where the Commission has addressed a decision to a Member State under the first subparagraph of Article 93(2) of the EEC Treaty requiring the recovery of aid unlawfully granted to an undertaking by that Member State, and where the undertaking concerned has failed to exercise its right to challenge that decision under Article 173 of the Treaty within the applicable time limit, the validity of the decision may not be called in question in proceedings before the national courts in which the undertaking opposes steps taken by the Member State to recover the aid."