natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I overensstemmelse med fast praksis, hvorefter begrundelsespligten består i, at det klart og utvetydigt skal angives, hvilke betragtninger den fællesskabsmyndighed, der har udstedt den anfægtede retsakt, har lagt til grund, dels således at sagsøgeren kan få kendskab til grundlaget for den trufne foranstaltning, for at han kan forsvare sine rettigheder, dels således at Fællesskabets retsinstanser kan udøve deres prøvelsesret, finder Retten, at Kommissionen på dette punkt har givet en passende begrundelse, idel Kelten har kunnet udøve sin legalitetskontrol af Kommissionens svar på sagsøgerens klage, for så vidt som denne vedrørte Buma's påståede misbrug af en dominerende stilling.
Thirdly, as regards the condition laid down in Article 85(3) of the Treaty whereby standard agreements may not impose on the undertakings concerned restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of the objectives referred to in that provision, it must be held that the applicant has not suggested any reasonable alternative to the Commission's view that the conclusion between copyright holders and each cable operator of a collective agreement for the diffusion by cable of television and radio programmes is indispensable in order to improve the effective and lawful retransmission of such programmes.
Heraf følger, at dette anbringende ikke kan tages til følge.
It follows that the applicant has not shown that the Commission's reasoning in that regard is vitiated by a manifest error of appraisal.
For så vidt som denne del af klagen vedrører den nederlandske stats handlinger — nemlig at den har givet Buma et lovbestemt monopol på at repræsentere ophavsmænd til musikværker — må Retten fastslå, at sagsøgeren under alle omstændigheder ikke er berettiget til at anfægte Kommissionens afslag på at indlede en procedure i henhold til artikel 169 eller til at meddele et direktiv eller en beslutning i henhold til traktatens artikel 90, stk. 3.
Finally, in so far as this part of the complaint refers to acts of the Netherlands State, namely the grant to Buma of the legal monopoly to represent authors of musical works, it is not necessary to determine whether the complaint submitted to the Commission was based exclusively on Article 3 of Regulation No 17, or whether it also contained complaints about the Netherlands State, thus requesting the Commission to initiate proceedings under Article 169 of the Treaty or to use the powers conferred on it by Article 90(3) of the Treaty.
Sagsøgeren har ikke godtgjort, at der foreligger de faktiske omstændigheder, han har gjort
It follows from the whole of the foregoing that the second plea must be rejected.
Det følger af det anførte, at påstanden om erstatning ikke kan tages til følge, da der i det foreliggende tilfælde hverken er ført bevis for, at der foreligger et retsstridigt forhold, eller at der er lidt et tab.
It is settled case-law that the Community cannot be liable under the second paragraph of Article 215 of the Treaty unless a set of conditions, relating to the existence of actual damage, a causal link between the damage claimed and the conduct alleged against the institutions, and the illegality of such conduct, is satisfied.
Sagsøgerens påstande afvises, for så vidt som de hverken vedrører annuUation af Kommissionens beslutning af 14. oktober 1993 om at afvise sagsøgerens klage eller kravet om erstatning.
The applicant has not therefore proved the existence of the facts which he alleges. Consequently, the Court considers that it is not possible to find any fault of such a nature as to render the Community liable under the second paragraph of Article 215.
I Øvrigt frifindes sagsøgte, for så vidt angår påstanden om annuUation og om erstatning.
It follows from the foregoing that, since neither fault nor damage has been established in the present case, the action for compensation must be rejected.
Sagsøgeren betaler sagens omkostninger, herunder intervenientens.*
Moreover, the applicant has not shown that it would actually be impossible for him to bring an action before the national court in order to challenge the alleged abuse of a dominant position by Buma.
KENDELSER
Findings of the Court
Kommissionens samtykke kræves, såfremt virkningerne af disse eksperimenter kan antages at ville berøre de andre medlemsstaters områder.
Dismisses the applicant's claims as inadmissible in so far as they are not for annulment of the Commissions decision of 14 October 1993 rejecting the applicants complaint or for compensation;
Den 5. september 1995 blev den første prøvesprængning gennemført på Mururoa.
Orders the applicant to pay the costs, including those of the intervener.'
Rettens bemærkninger
Court of First Instance
Retlig bedømmelse
22 December 1995
Den 6. september 1995 meddelte formanden for Kommissionen Europa-Parlamentet, at Kommissionen ikke var i stand til at udtale sig om anvendeligheden af artikel 34, men at den agtede at deltage i en videnskabelig mission.
(Nuclear tests conducted by a Member State — Application for interim relief — Article 34 of the EAEC Treaty — Application for suspension of the operation of a Commission decision regarding nuclear tests)
Den anden atomprøvesprængning fandt sted den 1. oktober 1995.
28 July 1995, the European Parliament asked the Commission to ensure that Articles 34 and 35 of the EAEC Treaty would be scrupulously observed.
Ifølge fast retspraksis bør spørgsmålet, om hovedsagen kan antages til realitetsbehandling, som hovedregel ikke behandles under en sag om foreløbige forholdsregler, idet Rettens afgørelse i hovedsagen herved kan foregribes.
Article 34 of the Treaty provides that any Member State in whose territories particularly dangerous experiments are to take place are to take additional health and safety measures, on which it must first obtain the opinion of the Commission.
med de omhandlede atomprøvesprængningers påståede skadelige virkninger, er dette ikke i sig selv tilstrækkeligt til at individualisere dem på lignende måde som adressaten for den omtvistede beslutning, da en skade som den, de påberåber sig, vil kunne ramme enhver person med bopæl i det pågældende område på samme måde.
Article 35 requires Member States to establish the facilities necessary to carry out continuous monitoring of air, water and soil radioactivity levels and to ensure compliance with basic standards; it also requires them to allow the Commission to have access to such facilities and to verify their operation and efficiency.
Sagsøgerne har intet fremført, der kan godtgøre, at den anfægtede beslutning umiddelbart berører dem på grund af visse egenskaber eller visse faktiske omstændigheder, som er særlige for dem.
The act by which that position was adopted constitutes the measure which three individuals, Ms Danielsson, Mr Largenteau and Mr Haoa, who reside in Tahiti, seek to have annulled in their main action and whose operation they seek to have suspended in the present application for interim measures.
Hvad først angør den omtvistede kommissionsretsakt karakter, fremgår det umiddelbart af retsaktens indhold samt af den retlige og faktiske sammenhæng, den blev vedtaget i, at den kan betragtes som en retsakt med karakter af beslutning, idet den indeholder Kommissionens endelige holdning, som er bestemt til at afføde retsvirkninger.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 12 December 1995, the French Republic sought leave to intervene in support of the Commission.
Retsakten medfører under alle omstændigheder, at det afvises at anvende traktatens artikel 34, hvorefter den berørte medlemsstat skal træffe yderligere bestemmelser om beskyttelse af sundheden, hvorom den forinden indhenter Kommissionens udtalelse.
On 6 September 1995, the President of the Commission, Mr Santer, informed the European Parliament that the Commission was not in a position to state whether Article 34 applied or not, but confirmed its intention to be involved in a scientific assessment mission.
Det følger heraf, at den anfægtede retsakt umiddelbart kan anses for at have karakter af en beslutning.
The allegation that the main action is manifestly inadmissible
Hvad dernæst angår sagsøgernes søgsmålskompetence, bemærkes, at i det foreliggende tilfælde er den anfægtede beslutning ikke rettet til sagsøgerne, men derimod til den franske regering.
It is settled case-law that, in principle, the issue of the admissibility of the main action should not be examined in proceedings relating to an application for interim measures, so as not to prejudge the Court's decision on the substance of the case.
Det skal derfor undersøges, om de alligevel er umiddelbart og individuelt berørt af beslutningen.
It should be reserved for the examination of the main action, unless it is apparent at first sight that the latter is manifestly inadmissible.
Der er nemlig umiddelbart ingen af de af sagsøgerne påberåbte bestemmelser i traktaten, der medfører en sådan forpligtelse.
On 23 October 1995, four days before the third test was carried out, the Commission adopted a final position on the question of the application of Article 34 to the nuclear tests in question.
En gennemgang af de relevante bestemmelser i traktatens kapitel 3 viser tværtimod klart, at Kommissionen i henhold til artikel 34 har pligt til at vurdere de omtvistede atomprøvesprængningers mulige virkninger for hele befolkningen og de berørte arbejdstagere.
That position, which is reproduced in the minutes of the 1266th meeting of the Commission at Brussels on 23 October 1995, produced before the Court, was presented to the plenary session of the European Parliament by the President of the Commission on the following day.
Når den træffer sådanne foranstaltninger, kan Kommissionen ikke have pligt til at tage hensyn til den særlige situation for hver enkelt beboer eller arbejdstager i det geografiske område, der berøres af et bestemt eksperiment, medmindre der foreligger særlige omstændigheder, som kan begrunde en sådan individuel hensyntagen i betragtning af de forfulgte mål.
It must be determined here whether, at first sight, the main application for annulment may be considered to meet the conditions for admissibility as regards both the nature of the contested act and the locus standi of the applicants.
Den anfægtede beslutning berører umiddelbart alene sagsøgerne i deres objektive egenskab af personer med bopæl på Tahiti på samme måde som enhver anden person med bopæl i Polynesien.
An experiment involving the explosion of a nuclear device might entail such a risk and could therefore be regarded, in certain circumstances, as 'particularly dangerous'.
Også selv om det antages, at sagsøgerne eventuelt kan lide en personlig skade, der er forbundet
The contested act may therefore be considered, prima facie, as being in the nature of a decision.
Under disse omstændigheder kan sagsøgerne ikke umiddelbart anses for at være individuel berørt af den omtvistede beslutning.
On that basis, and following the provision by the French authorities of important additional information as requested, the Commission concluded that the tests in French Polynesia did
Det hedder i kendelsens konklusion:
their situation of the measure which it envisaged adopting, in accordance with settled case-law.
Det tillades Den Franske Republik at intervenere til støtte for Kommissionens påstande.
Secondly, as regards the locus standi of the applicants in the present case, the contested decision was not addressed to the applicants but to the French Government.
Begæringen om foreløbige forholdsregler tages ikke tilfølge.
It must therefore be determined whether it is none the less of direct and individual concern to them.
FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
No such obligation is apparent at first sight from the Treaty provisions on which the applicants rely.
Sag C-53/95 Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) / Hans Kemmler medlemsstat pålægger en statsborger fra en anden medlemsstat, som samtidig udøver samme selvstændige virksomhed i to stater, at bidrage til sin sociale sikringsordning for selvstændige erhvervsdrivende, når den pågældende godtgør, at han i samme periode var tilsluttet en tilsvarende
On the contrary, analysis of the relevant provisions of Chapter 3 of the Treaty shows clearly that, in the context of Article 34, the Commission is under an obligation to assess the effects capable of being caused by the nuclear tests in issue on all members of the general public and workers concerned. When it takes such action, the Commission cannot be required to take into consideration the particular situation of each individual resident and worker within the geographical area concerned by a given experiment unless there are specific grounds for taking such considerations into account in the light of the objectives envisaged.
Præjudiciel — Tribunal du Travail de Tournai — social sikringsordning i den anden medlemsstat, fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 48, 51, 52 og i hvilken han havde hjemsted, og at betaling af bidrag til endnu en social sikringsordning ikke skaber nogen yderligere social beskyttelse til fordel for ham.«
As regards, first, the question whether the contested decision is of individual concern to the applicants, it has consistently been held that 'persons other than those to whom a decision is addressed may claim to be individually concerned by that decision only if it affects them by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or by reason of circumstances in which they are differentiated from all other persons and if by virtue of those factors it distinguishes them individually just as in the case of the person addressed.'
Sag C-127/94 The Queen / Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte: H & R Ecroyd Holdings Ltd m.fl. 59—situationen for en selvstændig erhvervsdrivende (advokat der driver virksomhed inden for etfirma) før ikrafttrædelsen af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1390/81 af 12. maj 1981 om udvidelse af forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, til også at omfatte selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer — advokat der udøver sin virksomhed i den medlemsstat, hvor han er statsborger, hvor han har hjemsted og er omfattet af den sociale sikring, samt i en anden medlemsstat, hvor han bor —forpligtelse til at bidrage til den sociale sikringsordning i bopælsstaten, uden at dette bidrag skaber en yderligere social beskyttelse.
That argument cannot be accepted because, at first sight, the contested decision concerns the applicants only in their objective capacity as residents of Tahiti, in the same way as any other person residing in Polynesia.
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling) den 11. januar 1996.
In those circumstances, the applicants cannot be regarded as being prima facie individually concerned by the contested decision.
»EØF-traktatens artikel 52 skal fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for, at en
Nor do they allege that the decision encroaches on a right which is specific to them and which, with regard to that decision, differentiates them from all other persons residing in Polynesia.
Præjudiciel—High Court of J u x t i c e ((¿úeen 'sBench Division) — fortolkning af artikel 3a, stk 3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/94 som ændret ved forordningerne (EØF) nr. 764/89 og 1639/91 og fortolkningen af artikel 3a, stk. 3, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1546/88 som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1033/88 som ændret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1033/89 -kvoteordning for mælkeproduktionen — tildeling af særlige referencemængder — medlemsstaternes beføjelser og/eller forpligteL·er - medlemsstatens ansvar — beregningsmåden for erstatning.
In particular, in the legal context of the present dispute, it is necessary to reject the applicants' argument that the Commission was, by virtue of certain specific provisions of the Treaty, under a duty to take account of the consequences for
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslap til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 11. januar 1996.
The President of the Court of First Instance made the following order:
som ændret ved Rådets forordninger (EØF) nr. 764/89 og nr. 1639/91, eller efter Domstolens dom af 3. december 1992 i Wehrs-sagen (sag C264/90).
The French Republic is granted leave to intervene in support of the form of order sought by the Commission.
3) I betragtning af de givne svar er det ikke fornødent at besvare det fjerde, det femte og det sjette spørgsmål.«
Costs are reserved.'
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — undladelse af korrekt og fuldstændigt at have gennemført Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning på miljøet i national ret — bestemmelser udstedt af regionerne Flandern og Bruxelles
Case C-53/95 Institut National d'Assurances Sociales pour Travailleurs Indépendants ('INASTI') ν Hans Kemmler who is pursuing the same activity simultaneously in both States, to pay contributions to its social security scheme for self-employed persons, where the person concerned demonstrates that, over the same period, he was affiliated to an equivalent social security scheme in the other Member State, where he habitually resides, and that the payment of contributions to a second social security scheme cannot give rise to any additional social security cover for him.'
3) Den kompetente nationale myndighed kunne ikke på egen hånd drage konsekvenserne af Wehrs-dommen, før der var indført nye fællesskabsbestemmelser med det formål at afhjælpe den konstaterede ugyldighed.
Case C-127/94 The Queen ν Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte: II & R Ecroyd Holdings Ltd e.a. Preliminary ruling - Tribunal du Travail de Tournai - Interpretation of Articles 48, 51, 52 and 59 of the EC Treaty - Situation of a self-employed person (lawyerpractising in a partnership) before the entry into force of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1390181 of 12 May 1981 extending to self-employed persons and members of their families Regulation (EEC) No 1408171 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community - Lawyer practising in the Member State of which he is a national, where he is domiciled and where he is subject to social security as well as in another Member State where he is resident - Obligation to contribute to the social security scheme of the State of residence without that contribution giving rise to additional social security cover
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 11. januar 1996.
Advocate General M.D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber Chamber on 11 January 1996.
·— Det fastslås, at Kongeriget Belgien, ved ikke ikke fuldstændigt og korrekt at gennemføre Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning på miljøet i belgisk ret, har tilsidesat de forpligtelser, som påhviler det i henhold til dette direktiv, navnlig dets artikel 2,4,7,9 og 12.
Preliminary ruling - High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) - Interpretation of Article 3a(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/94 as amended by Regulations (EEC) No 764/89 and 1639/91 and the interpretation of Article 3a(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1546/88 as amended by Regelation (EEC) No 1033/89 - Milk production quota system - Grant of specific reference quantities - Powers and/or duties of the Member States - Liability of a Member State - Method of calculation of damages
- Kongeriget Belgien dømmes til at betale sagens omkostninger.«
'Article 52 of the EEC Treaty must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from requiring a national of another Member State,
Præjudiciel — Nederlandenes Hoge Raad ­fortolkning af artikel 5, nr. 1, i Bruxelles­konventionen — arbejdsaftale der skal opfyldes i flere kontraherende stater — sted hvor arbejdstageren sædvanligvis udfører arbejdet
Article 3a(l) of Regulation No 857/84, as amended by Regulations Nos 764/89 and 1639/91, has not revealed any factor of such a kind as to affect its validity in so far as it excludes producers who have acquired a holding through an inheritance or similar means after 29 June 1989;
Appel af Rettens dom (Første Udvidede Afdeling) afsagt den 18. september 1995 i sag T­548/93 — annuUation af Kommissionens beslutning om afvisning af Ladbroke Racing Ltd's klage — væddemål i hestevæddeløb — den fælles tipstjeneste Pari mutuel urbain
In view of the answers given, it is not necessary to answer the fourth, fifth and sixth questions.' the main proceedings, the competent national authority has neither a power nor a duty to award a provisional special reference quantity to the applicant or to treat it as if it had been awarded a special reference quantity either pursuant to Council Regulation No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 764/89, or following the judgment of the Court in Case C-264/90 Wehrs;
Sag C­384/95 Landboden­Agrardienste GmbH & Co. KG / Finanzamt Calau Traktatbrudssøgsmål — undladelse af inden for den fastsatte frist at have gennemført Rådets direktiv 91/414/EØF om markedsføring af plantebeskyttelsesmidler
Article 3a(l) of Regulation No 857/84 as amended by Council Regulation No 764/89 is invalid to the extent held in the judgment in Wehrs, cited above;
Præjudiciel — Finanzgericht des Landes Brandenburg — fortolkning af artikel 6, stk. 1, artikel 11, punkt A, stk. 1, litra a), og artikel 12, stk 3, litra a), fjerde punktum, og af bilag H, nr. 1, i direktiv 77/388/EØF: Rådets sjette direktiv om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag ­ begrebet tjenesteydelse ­frivillig begrænsning af kartoffelhøsten på den afgiftspligtiges bedrift med henblik på at opnå støtte til fremme af en mere ekstensiv produktion — anvendelse af en nedsat sats
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Failure to transpose correctly and completely into domestic law Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment - Provisions adopted by the Flemish and Brussels regions
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — undladelse af inden for den fastsatte frist at have gennemført Rådets direktiv 92/109/EØF om fremstilling og markedsføring af visse stoffer, der benyttes ved ulovlig fremstilling af narkotika og psykotrope stoffer
In view of the answer to the third question, it is not necessary to answer the fourth and fifth questions.'
Præjudiciel — Bundesfinanzhof — fortolkning af den fælles toldtarif, navnlig af bestemmelse 5B til kapitel 84 og af pos. 8543 — tarifering af en elektronisk komponent »Vista Board«, som er bestemt til billedforarbejdning og kan anvendes som grafikkort i en datamat ­ selvstændig funktion i forhold til databehandling
Declare that, by not completely and correctly transposing into Belgian law Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive, in particular Articles 2, 4, 7 and 12;
Traktatbrudssøgsmål ­ undladelse af inden for den fastsatte frist at have gennemført Rådets direktiv 92/45/EØF om sundhedsmæssige og dyresundhedsmæssige problemer i forbindelse med nedlægning af vildtlevende vildt og afsætning af kød heraf, Kommissionens direktiv 93/48/EØF om oversigten over de betingelser, der skal opfyldes af frugtplanteformeringsmateriale og frugtplanter bestemt til frugtproduktion i henhold til artikel 4 i Rådets direktiv 92/34/EØF, Kommissionens direktiv 93/49/EØF om oversigterne over de betingelser, der skal opfyldes
In a situation such as that in point in the main proceedings, the competent national authority has neither a power nor a duty to award the applicant a provisional special reference quantity or to treat him as if he had been awarded a special reference quantity, either pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the