natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Se sag T­76/92 Vederlag ­ dagpenge Ansættelse ­ særlig procedure
Moritz ν Commission
Forfremmelse ­ bedømmelse ­for sent udfærdiget
Promotion ­ Staff report ­Belated report
Placering ­ forflyttelse uden ansøgning
Employment transfer
Ansættelse ­ almindelig udvælgelsesprøve ­ tilside­sættelse af kravet om anonymitet
Recruitment ­ Open competition ­ Disregard of anonymity rule
Oversigt over andre afgørelser truffet af Retten i Første Instans, som er refereret i "Arbejdet ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol og Ret i Første Instans" i 1993
Synopsis of the other decisions of the Court of First Instance which appeared in the "Proceedings" in 1993
Emne
Number of issueulle tin
Lebensmittel mod Kommissionen og T-9/93 R rettergangsformer intervention - fortrolighed -foreløbige forholdsregler
Competition ­ Proceedings for interim relief ­ Intervention ­Confidentiality ­ Interim measures
Konkurrence - foreløbige forholdsregler - intervention -fortrolighed - udsættelse af gennemførelsen
Competition ­ Proceedings for interim relief ­ Intervention ­Confidentiality ­ Interim measures
Konkurrence - særlige rettergangsformer - udsættelse af gennemførelsen - foreløbige forholdsregler
Competition ­ Proceedings for interim relief ­ Intervention ­Confidentiality ­ Interim measures
E. Tate m.fl. mod Den Europæiske Investeringsbank
Decision of lhe EIB ­ Action for annulment ­ Inadmissibility
V. Oversigt over meddelelser i "Arbejdet ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol og Ret i Første Instans" i 1993
V. List of notices which appeared in the "Proceedings" in 1993
Rådets afgørelse af 8. juni 1983 om overførsel af nye kompetenceområder til Retten i Første Instans.
Decision of the Council of lhe European Communities of 8 June 1993 to extend the jurisdiction transferred to the Court of First Instance
Andre sager
Special procedures
0 I ALT
0 TOTAL
Ved dom
By judgment
Ved udtalelse
By an Opinion
C INDBRAGTE SAGER
C. CASES BROUGHT
Udtalelser
0 Special procedures
De med "almindelige typer" angivne tal er "nettotal", som tager hensyn til, at nogle sager er behandlet som "forenede sager". De i kursiv angivne tal er derimod "bruttotal".
Net figures in normal type (number of cases taking into account cases joined on account of the connection between them); gross figures in italics (total number of cases regardless of cases joined on account of the connection between them).
Heraf 451 sager, der er blevet henvist til Retten i Første Instans.
of which 451 cases were transferred to the Court of First Instance.
D. BEGÆRINGER OM FORELØBIGE FORHOLDSREGLER
D. APPLICATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERÍM MEASURES
0 F. GENNEMSNITLIG SAGSBEHANDLINGSTID (rctsfcricrnc indbefattet)
F. AVERAGE LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS(including judicial vacations)
18,8 måneder
18.8 months
20,4 måneder
20.4 months
25,8 måneder
25.8 months
22,9 måneder
22.9 months
17,5 måneder
17.5 months
19,2 måneder
19.2 months
2,7 måneder
2.7 months
Herunder 231 "mælkekvotesager" - ansvar uden for kontraktforhold for Fællesskabet.
including a series of 231 cases all concerning the non-contractual liability of the Community with regard to milk quotas.
Angivelserne vedrørende den gennemsnitlige sagsbehandlingstid gælder kun sager, der er afsluttet ved dom, men ikke sager, i hvilke der er truffet bestemmelse om en udsættelse af retsforhandlingerne.
The figures relating to the average length of proceedings have been arrived at by calculating only the cases brought to an end by judgments and excluding cases where lhe proceedings have been formally stayed.
Ved kendelse
By order terminating the proceedings
G INDBRAGTE SAGER
C. CASES BROUGHT
Det bemærkes, at 451 sager (herunder 380 "mælkckvotesagcr" - ansvar uden for kontraktforhold for Fællesskabet) den 27. september 1993 blev henvist til Retten i Første Instans.
It should be noted that 451 cases (380 of which concerning the non-contractual liability of the Community with regard to milk quotas) were transferred to the Court of First Instance as of 27 September 1993.
F. GENNEMSNITLIG SAGSBEHANDLINGSTID (rclsfcricrne indbefattet)
F. AVERAGE LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS3 (including judicial vacations)
23,3 måneder
23.3 months
Personalesager
Staff" cases
17,0 måneder
17.0 months
Redaktionen afsluttet: 27.1.1994 Katalognummer: DX-AC-93-038-DA-C
Completed: 27.01.1994 Catalogue No: DX-AC-93-038-EN-C including a series of 392 cases all concerning the non-contractual liability of the Community with regard to milk quotas.
Sag C-296/92
Republic
Sag T­65/91 White mod Kommissionen Tjenestemandssag
Case T­65/91 Uhite ν Commission Staff case
FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
OPINIONS Case C­387/92
Lenz Sag C­80/92 Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Belgien Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat G. Tesauro
Case C­80/92
"Traktatbrud ­ offentlige bygge­ og anlægskontrakter ­ afvisning" (Domstolens plenum)
Case C-296/92: Commission ν Italian Republic 12 January 1994 (Action against a Member State for failure to fulfil obligations - Public works contract - Inadmissibility) (Full Court)
Ved stævning indgivet den 6. juli 1992 havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik har undladt at opfylde sine forpligtelser i henhold til Rådets direktiv 71/305/EØF af 26. juli 1971 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne med hensyn til indgåelse af offentlige bygge­ og anlægskontrakter, idet den i stedet for at gribe ind for fra begyndelsen af fjerne de mod fællesskabsretten stridende retsvirkninger har accepteret, at provinsforvaltningen i Ascoli Piceno den 21. maj 1990 under hånden afsluttede kontrakt om det ellevte og det tolvte supplerende projekt til færdiggørelsen af motortrafikvejsstrækningen "Ascoli­Mare", der går under betegnelsen "IV ­ delprojekt 5134", og undlod at offentliggøre en udbudsbekendtgørelse i EF­Tidende.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 6 July 1992, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for declaration that, by allowing the provincial administration of Ascoli Piceno to award a private contract on 21 May 1990 for the 11th and 12th supplementary reports for the completion of the section of rapid transit highway between Ascoli and Mare, entitled "Stage IV - Project 5134" and to fail to publish a notice of invitation to tender in the Official Journal of the European Communities, and by not taking steps to preclude at the outset the legal effects thereof which infringe Community law, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts.
Domstolen bemærkede, at Kommissionen i den begrundede udtalelse havde gjort gældende, at Den Italienske Republik havde undladt at opfylde sine forplig­telser i henhold til direktiv 71/305 derved, at provinsforvaltningen i Ascoli Piceno havde tildelt den omhandlede kontrakt ved fremgangsmåden med underhånds­aftale og ikke lod en udbudsbekendtgørelse offentliggøre i EF­Tidende.
In its reasoned opinion, the Commission complained that the Italian Republic had failed to comply with its obligations under Directive 71/305 in so far as the provincial administration of Ascoli Piceno had awarded the public works at issue by a private contract and had failed to publish a notice of invitation to tender in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
I stæv­ningen havde Kommissionen derimod nedlagt påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik havde tilsidesat de samme forpligtelser, idet den i stedet for at gribe ind for at hindre fællesskabsretsstridighed havde accepteret, at provinsforvaltningen i Ascoli Piceno anvendte denne fremgangsmåde.
In its application, on the other hand, the Commission asked the Court to declare that the Italian Republic had failed to comply with those obligations by allowing the provincial administration of Ascoli Piceno to act in that way and by not taking steps to preclude the effects thereof.
Domstolen fremhævede, at vel er enhver medlemsstat ansvarlig over for Fælles­skabet for enhver tilsidesættelse af fællesskabsretten, men at det ikke med den foreliggende sag var tilsigtet at opnå dom for, at der foreligger en sådan til­sidesættelse, og at stævningen i alt fald var støttet på et klagepunkt, der var forskelligt fra det i den begrundede udtalelse fremsatte klagepunkt.
While it is true that each Member State is responsible vis-à-vis the Community for any breach of Community law by one of its bodies, it must nevertheless be emphasized that in this case the subject-matter of the action was not a declaration of such a breach and in any event the application was founded on a complaint which was different from that formulated in the reasoned opinion.
Generaladvokat C. Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse for Domstolens plenum den 18. november 1993.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 18 November 1993.
"at frifinde Den Italienske Republik og at dømme Kommissionen til at afholde sagens omkostninger."
"Dismiss the application and order the Commission to pay the costs."
Ved kendelse af 22. september 1992, indgået til Domstolen den 12. oktober s.a., havde Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål ved rørende et selektivt distributionssystems "tæthed" som betingelse for, at det er gyldigt i henhold til EØF-traktatens artikel 85.
Case C­376/92: Metro SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG ν Cartier SA 13 January 1994 Reference for a preliminary ruling (Selective distribution system - Article 85 of the EEC Treaty - Imperviousness as a condition of validity) (Fifth Chamber) By order of 22 September 1992, which was received at the Court on 12 October 1992 the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty a question concerning the "imperviousness" of a selective distribution system as a condition of its validity under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty.
Spørgsmålet var stillet under en sag, som selskabet Metro havde anlagt mod selskabet Cartier med påstand om, at det blev fastslået, at Cartier var forpligtet til gratis at yde garanti på de Cartierure, Metro solgte.
That question was raised in proceedings brought by Metro SB-Großmarkte GmbH against Cartier SA for a declaration that the latter was under a obligation to provide its guarantee free of charge in respect of the Cartier watches which it offered for sale.
Metro er ikke autoriseret Cartier-forhandler. I flere år havde Metro imidlertid kunnet skaffe sig Cartier-ure på markedet i tredjelande, f.eks. Schweiz, hvor der er huller i Cartier's selektive distributionssystem.
Metro did not belong to the network of Cartier licensees.
Siden 1984 har Cartier uden undtagelse nægtet at honorere garantien vederlagsfrit på ure, der ikke er købt hos autoriserede forhandlere.
Since 1984, Cartier had refused categorically to provide its guarantee free of charge in respect of watches which had not been obtained from its authorized dealers.
Metro var af den opfattelse, at begrænsningen af garantien var uforenelig med traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, og anlagde derfor sag med påstand om, at Cartier tilpligtedes at anerkende sin forpligtelse til at yde garanti på de Cartierure, som ledsages af en garantierklæring, som Metro har udfyldt og under skrevet.
Taking the view that the restriction of the guarantee was incompatible with Article 85(1) of the Treaty, Metro applied in 1984 for a declaration that Cartier was under an obligation to grant the guarantee in respect of Cartier watches sold with a guarantee certificate completed and signed by Metro.
Som afslutning på en revisionsankesag bemærkede Bundesgerichtshof, at bestemmelserne om krydsleverancer mellem autoriserede forhandlere ikke var i strid med traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1.
In a further appeal on a point of law, the Bundesgerichtshof considered that the contested terms were not contrary to Article 85(1) of the Treaty.
Bundesgerichtshof understregede i øvrigt, at Cartier's begrænsning af garantien var aftalt i kontrakten mellem Cartier og dennes forhandlere og derfor var omfattet af traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1.
Furthermore, the Bundesgerichtshof emphasized that the restriction of the Cartier guarantee was the result of a contractual undertaking given by Cartier to its retailers and therefore fell within the scope of Article 85(1) of the Treaty.
Endelig og navnlig præciserede Bundesgerichtshof, at begrænsningen af garantien kun var lovlig, for så vidt som Cartier's selektive distributionssystem på ure inden for det fælles marked er "tæt" (lückenlos).
Finally, and above all, it pointed out that the restriction of the guarantee was permissible only in so far as the selective distribution system for Cartier watches in the common market was "impervious" (lückenlos).
Bundesgerichtshof hjemviste derfor sagen til Oberlandesgericht, for at denne kunne tage stilling til, om Cartier's selektive distributionssystem inden for det fælles marked er "tæt".
The Bundesgerichtshof accordingly referred the case back to the Oberlandesgericht for that court to determine whether or not Cartier had an "impervious" selective distribution system within the Common Market.
- 5 - heder for at have medvirket til at tilsidesætte en kontraktlig forpligtelse, såfremt forpligtelsen i sig selv er gyldig i henhold til traktatens artikel 85.
In such proceedings for unfair competition, the question of the validity of the contract under Article 85 of the Treaty arose in the form of a preliminary issue.
Endvidere, fortsatte Domstolen, kan anvendelsen af det fællesskabsretlige kartel forbud ikke afhænge af en betingelse, der er særegen for en national retsorden.
The application of the prohibition on agreements, decisions and concerted practices laid down by Community law cannot depend on a condition which is peculiar to a national system.
Den betingelse om "tæthed", som er udviklet i tysk ret, er ukendt i næsten alle de øvrige medlemsstaters retssystemer.
The requirement of "imperviousness" laid down in German law does not exist in the law of most of the other Member States.
Domstolen tilføjede, at såfremt gyldigheden af et selektivt distributionssystem under hensyn til traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, gøres betinget af, at det er "tæt", ville det have den paradoksale følge, at de snævreste og mest lukkede distributionssystemer behandles lempeligere efter traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, end distributionssystemer, der er mere fleksible og i højere grad åbner mulighed for parallelle transaktioner.
Moreover, to make the validity of a selective distribution system under Article 85(1) of the Treaty conditional on its "imperviousness" would lead to the paradoxical result that the most inflexible and most tightly sealed distribution systems would be treated more favourably under Article 85(1) of the Treaty than distribution systems that were more flexible and more open to parallel transactions.
Domstolen bemærkede endelig, at en anerkendelse af gyldigheden af et selektivt distributionssystem på det fælles marked ikke kan afhænge af, hvorvidt den enkelte fabrikant er i stand til over alt at sikre systemets "tæthed", eftersom lovgivningen i visse tredjelande kan begrænse mulighederne for eller endog forhindre, at dette mål nås.
Finally, recognition of the validity of a selective distribution network in the common market cannot depend on a manufacturer's ability to ensure that the network was "impervious" everywhere, given that the legislation of certain Member States may hinder or even prevent the achievement of that objective.
Det fremgik af det anførte, at det ikke er en betingelse for, at et selektivt distributionssystem er gyldigt i henhold til fællesskabsretten, at det er "tæt".
It followed from those observations that the "imperviousness" of a selective distribution system was not a condition of its validity under Community law.
Det måtte herefter undersøges, på hvilke betingelser en begrænsning af garantien til kun at omfatte ure, der er købt hos autoriserede forhandlere, kan antages at være lovlig i henhold til traktatens artikel 85.
It remained appropriate to consider in what circumstances the restriction of the guarantee to watches obtained from authorized dealers could be considered lawful under Article 85 of the Treaty.
Domstolen bemærkede hertil først, at en kontraktlig forpligtelse om at begrænse garantien til de handlende, der hører til distributionssystemet, og nægte at yde garanti for varer, der er afsat af andre, giver samme resultat og afføder samme retsvirkning som kontraktbestemmelser, hvorefter det kun er forhandlere i distributionssystemet, der må sælge varerne.
In that regard, it was noted that a contractual obligation to restrict the guarantee to dealers within the network and to refuse to grant it in respect of goods sold by third parties led to the same result and had the same effect as contractual terms which reserve the right to sell to members of a network.
Domstolen bemærkede afslutningsvis, at da kontraktbestemmelser, hvorved en producent forpligter sig til kun at sælge gennem autoriserede forhandlere, og hvorved disse selv forpligter sig til kun at videresælge til andre autoriserede forhandlere eller til forbrugere, er lovlige, er der intet hensyn, der taler for at anlægge en strengere bedømmelse af en ordning, hvorefter garantien i henhold til kontrakten er begrænset til produkter, der sælges gennem autoriserede forhandlere.
Since contractual terms whereby the manufacturer undertakes to sell only through authorized dealers and whereby those dealers themselves undertake to resell only to other authorized dealers or to consumers were lawful, there were no grounds for applying stricter treatment to arrangements for restricting the guarantee by contract to products sold through authorized dealers.
I relation til traktatens artikel 85 er det alene formålet med begrænsningen og den virkning, den har, der er relevant.
Under Article 85 of the Treaty, only the purpose of that restriction and its effect were relevant.
Når et selektivt distributionssystem opfylder gyldighedskriterierne i henhold til traktatens artikel 85, således som de er præciseret i Dom stolens praksis, er en begrænsning af fabrikantens garanti til kun at omfatte de aftalevarer, der er købt hos autoriserede forhandlere, også gyldig."
Where a selective distribution system satisfies the criteria for validity laid down in Article 85 of the EEC Treaty, as defined by the Court in its case-law, the restriction of the manufacturer's guarantee to products covered by the contract which are obtained from authorized dealers must also be regarded as valid."
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet i Femte Afdeling den 27. oktober 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 27 October 1993.
I relation til et selektivt distributionssystem bevirker den blotte omstændighed, at aftalevarer lovligt bringes i omsætning på de samme markeder, ikke alene af autoriserede forhandlere, men også af handlende, som ikke hører til det selektive distributionssystem, ikke, at systemet bliver uforeneligt med traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1.
Under a selective distribution system, the mere fact that the products covered by the contract are lawfully offered for sale on the same markets, not only by the official licensees but also by dealers not forming part of the selective distribution network, is not such as to render the system itself incompatible with Article 85(1) of the Treaty.
Traktatens artikel 85, stk. 1, er i forbindelse med et selektivt distributionssystem til hinder for, at en producent efter aftale med de autoriserede forhandlere nægter at yde fabrikationsgaranti for varer, der lovligt sælges af ikke-autoriserede forhandlere.
Article 85(1) of the Treaty precludes a producer, in the context of a selective distribution system, from refusing with the agreement of his authorized licensees to grant the guarantee for manufacturing defects in respect of products lawfully offered for sale by unauthorized dealers.
Den nævnte garanti kan dog ikke påberåbes af køberen med hensyn til mangler eller beskadigelser af produktet, der skyldes, at den ikke-autoriserede forhandler ikke eller ikke fagmæssigt har leveret ydelser, der normalt udføres af de autoriserede forhandlere."
That guarantee, however, may not be relied upon by the purchaser in relation to defects or damage to the product resulting from the failure of an unauthorized dealer to provide, or correctly to perform, services which are normally carried out by authorized licensees."
"Tjenestemænd - udpegelse af repræsentanter for personalet til vedtægtsmæssige og administrative organer - bestemmelser om fastlæggelse af principper om kol· legialitet og om forholdsmæssig fordeling på grundlag af valgresultaterne institutionens forpligtelser - de fornødne foranstaltninger ikke truffet - formaliteten"
Case T-65/91: White ν Commission 12 January 1994 (Officials - Appointment of staff representatives to the administrative or Staff Regulations bodies - Regulations establishing principles of collégial and proportional distribution in relation to electoral results - Duties of the institution - Failure to take appropriate measures - Admissibility) (Fourth Chamber)
Fortolkning af EØF-traktatens artikel 90 - nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter offentlige udlånsvirksomheder, som er afgiftspligtige, er meddelt fritagelse for alle former for afgifter til stat, provins og kommune.
Interpretation of Article 90 of the EEC Treaty - National legislation granting official credit institutions an exemption from taxes payable to the state, province or municipality provided that they prove they have taxpayer status.
En afgiftsfritagelse som den, der er fastsat i artikel 29 i den spanske lov nr. 13/71, frembyder ikke - idet det dog tilkommer den forelæggende retsinstans at tage endelig stilling til de faktiske omstændigheder i sagen - de typiske kendetegn for et misbrug af en dominerende stilling som følge af en af staten udstedt bestemmelse.
A tax exemption such as that provided for in Article 29 of Law No 13/71 does not have - subject to a definitive assessment of the facts of the case by the referring court - the characteristics of an abuse of a dominant position arising from a measure taken by a State.
En sådan fritagelse skal vurderes på grundlag af de bestående fællesskabsretlige bestemmelser om statsstøtte."
Such an exemption must be assessed with regard to the Community law provisions relating to existing State aids."
Sag C-80/92: Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Belgien
Case C­80/92: Commission ν Kingdom of Belgium
Traktatbrud - EØF-traktatens artikel 30, 34 og 59 - bestemmelser, hvorefter import og markedsføring af radiomodtagerstationer, der lovligt fremstilles og markedsføres i andre medlemsstater, er omfattet af en godkendelsesprocedure.
Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Articles 30, 34 and 59 of the EEC Treaty - Legislation making the importing and marketing of equipment for radio-communication reception, lawfully made and marketed in other Member States, subject to a certification procedure
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet for Domstolens plenum den 12. januar 1994.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 12 January 1994.
Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til traktatens artikel 30, idet det har udstedt og opretholdt en ordning om godkendelse af radiomodtagerstationer, jf. artikel 7 i lov af 30. juli 1979 og gennemførelsesanordningerne til nævnte lov.
By adopting and maintaining in force the certification system governing reception equipment for telecommunications provided for in Article 7 of the Law of 30 July 1979, and in the implementing decrees relating to that law, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the Treaty.
I øvrigt frifindes sagsøgte.
The other complaints are dismissed.
Kommissionens og Kongeriget Belgiens omkostninger afholdes af Kommissionen med to tredjedele og af Kongeriget Belgien med en tredjedel.
Two-thirds of the costs incurred by the Commission and by the Kingdom of Belgium are to be borne by the Commission and the remaining third by the Kingdom of Belgium.
Intervenienten, Det Forenede Kongerige, bærer sine egne omkostninger."
The United Kingdom, intervener, shall bear its own costs."