natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om udbetaling af forskud for september måned 1989 på de bogførte udgifter, der finansieres af EUGFL, Garantisektionen.
- 22 activities other than those mentioned in the reply to the Question 1 (a), the latter activities are not taxable transactions within the meaning of Article 17 (2) of the Sixth Directive and cannot benefit from the exemptions provided for in Article 13 B. Such activities likewise do not therefore give rise to a special right to a deduction under Article 17 (3) of the Sixth Directive.
1. at der afsiges f rifindelsesdom i de to annullationssøgsmål, som Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og Den Italienske Republik har anlagt mod Kommissionens beslutning nr. Κ (89) 1525 af 30. august 1989 om udbetaling af forskud på bogførte udgifter, der finansieres af EUGFL, Garantisektionen.
Questions 1 (b) and 2 (b) In replying to these questions, it is unnecessary to take account of the fact that a holding company is a link forming part of a worldwide group which appears outwardly under a single name - the name of the group - in which certain companies are to be regarded as taxable persons which carry out taxable transactions."
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om udbetaling af forskud på de bogførte udgifter, der finansieres af EUGFL, Garantisektionen.
By order of 16 January 1990, which was received at the Court on 12 February 1990, the Verwaltungsgerichtshof [Higher Administrative Court] Baden-Württemberg submitted several questions for a preliminary ruling on the validity and interpretation of Council Directive 79/373/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the marketing of compound feedingstuffs and Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 11. juni 1991.
The questions were raised in proceedings between the above parties concerning the refusal by the Land authorities to allow Denkavit to market compound feedingstuffs properly manufactured in the Netherlands on the ground that Denkavit had not complied with the German regulations on the labelling thereof.
"Jeg skal derfor foreslå,
The Court ruled as follows:
Præjudicielle - Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (contencioso administrativo), Barcelona - fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikler 30 og 36 i relation til nationale bestemmelser om forbud mod at reklamere for drikkevarer med et alkoholindhold på 23% vol og derover
The obligation imposed by the legislation of a Member State to specify the ingredients in descending order of their proportion in compound feedingstuffs is justified in the general interest of the protection of health and life of humans and animals, within the meaning of Article 36 of the Treaty, and by the requirements of consumer protection and fair trading.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 11. juni
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 5 March 1991.
Han foreslog:
He stated:
"Sammenfattende skal jeg herefter foreslå, at de præjudicielle spørgsmål besvares således:
"I propose that the Court rules as follows:
Artikel 30 skal fortolkes således, at den principielt er til hinder for bestemmelser, hvorefter det på visse nærmere betingelser - og der således ikke er tale om et absolut forbud - er forbudt at reklamere for drikkevarer med et alkoholdindhold på 23% vol. og derover.
Article 5 (4) (b) and Article 5 (7) of Council Directive 79/373/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the marketing of compound feedingstuffs must be interpreted as allowing a Member State to introduce in its legislation an obligation to specify all or any of the details mentioned in Article 5 (4), even if the domestic provisions did not impose that requirement at the time of adoption of the directive.
Sag C-100/90: Kommissionen mod Danmark
Case C-342/89
En stats traktatbrud - Rådets direktiv 69/169/EØF - begrænsningen på 10 liter motorbrændstof i transportable beholdere udvidet til at omfatte samtlige slags brændstof
Annulment of the Commission decision on the advance against the entry in the accounts of expenditure financed by the EAGGF for September 1989.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 11. juni 1991.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 11 June 1991.
Jeg skal endvidere foreslå, at Kongeriget Danmark tilpligtes at afholde sagens omkostninger."
He stated: "Consequently, I propose:
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikler 59 og 60 - begrebet "tjenesteydelser" i Traktatens artikel 60 - virksomhed bestående i udførelse af abort eller lægelig afbrydelse af svangerskab - national lovgivning der forbyder abort - reklame for klinikker i andre medlemsstater, hvor svangerskabsafbrydelse foretages.
Preliminary rulings - Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Contentious-Administrative Division), Barcelona -Interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty concerning national legislation prohibiting advertising of alcoholic drinks of a strength exceeding 23 degrees.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 11. juni 1991.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 11 June 1991.
SPUC har derfor nedlagt påstand om, at High Court forbyder offentliggørelsen af sådanne oplysninger.
"On the basis of the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court reply as follows:
Studenterorganisationerne har gjort gældende, at gravide kvinder, der bor i Irland, ifølge fællesskabsretten har ret til at rejse til en anden medlemsstat, hvor svangerskabsafbrydelse er tilladt og dér få afbrudt et svangerskab i en lægelig institution i dette land.
Article 30 must be interpreted as prohibiting in principle any rules which in certain circumstances, even if not absolutely, prohibit advertising of beverages of an alcoholic strength exceeding 23 degrees.
De har ligeledes anført, at denne fri hed i henhold til fællesskabsretten medfører en ret for de pågældende kvinder til i Irland at indhente oplysninger om navn og adresse på de klinikker i andre medlemsstater, hvor svangerskabsafbrydelse foretages, og om, hvorledes man kommer i kontakt med disse. De har endelig gjort gældende, at den ret til oplysning, som gravide kvinder, der bor i Irland, har, også indebærer, at studenterorganisationerne på grundlag af fællesskabsretten kan udbrede sådanne oplysninger i Irland.
In the absence of Community rules, Articles 30 and 36 do not preclude rules of the kind referred to in the answer to the first question, in so far as such rules are necessary for the protection of public health and their restrictive effect on intra-Community trade is not disproportionate in relation to that objective, and it likewise does not appear that it constitutes arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Member States.
Inden for disse rammer kan en medlemsstat under anvendelse af dens skøn med føje fastslå, at et*forbud mod at udlevere oplysninger til gravide kvinder ­i det omfang der er tale om oplysninger i form af hjælp til disse kvinder til at afbryde et fosters liv ­ er nyttigt og nødvendigt under hensyn til det forfulgte mål og ikke uforholdsmæssigt i forhold til det tilstræbte mål, idet dette mål består i at respektere en i forfatningen optaget værdinorm om, at et fosters liv er værdigt til en udstrakt beskyttelse.
"I therefore invite the Court to find that, by applying to all fuels, and not just to motor fuel, the limit of 10 litres laid down by Directive 69/169/EEC as amended by Directive 78/1033/EEC for the duty-free import of fuel in portable containers, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations. Denmark should be ordered to pay the costs."
Endelig behandlede generaladvokaten spørgsmålet, om det pågældende forbud er foreneligt med fællesskabsrettens generelle principper vedrørende de grundlæg­gende friheder og rettigheder.
Case C-159/90 The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd (SPUC) ν S. Grogan and Others
Generaladvokaten konkluderede herom, at det fremgår af ordlyden af artikel 10, stk. 2, i nævnte konvention samt af Domstolens praksis og af retspraksis i Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskommission, at medlemsstaterne kan opstille de begrænsninger for ytringsfriheden, som fremgår af lovgivningen, og at den af Irland anvendte begrænsning fremgår af lovgivningen og ikke er uforholdsmæs­sige i forhold til det tilstræbte mål.
Preliminary ruling - High Court of Ireland - Interpretation of Articles 59 and 60 of the EEC Treaty - Concept of "services" in Article 60 - Activity consisting of abortion or medical termination of pregnancy - National legislation prohibiting abortion -Advertising of clinics in other Member States where abortions are carried out.
Hans forslag til afgørelse lød således:
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 11 June 1991.
"Jeg skal derfor foreslå Domstolen at besvare de spørgsmål, som den nationale ret har forelagt, således:
The SPUC therefore asked the High Court to prohibit the publication of information of that kind.
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 95 - forenelighed med fællesskabsretten af en skattelignende, fransk afgift, der skal dække udgifterne til oplagring og intervention på kornmarkedet.
- 26 - as a corollary to that right derived from Community law there was a right for interested women in Ireland to obtain information as to the identity and location of abortion clinics in other Member States and the manner of contacting them.
Generaladvokat Jean Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Fjerde Afdeling) den 11. juni 1991.
Lastly, they stated that that right of information on the part of pregnant women resident in Ireland also gave rise to a right under Community law for the defendants to distribute the relevant information in Ireland.
Hans forslag lød således:
Reasoning of the Advocate General
"På grundlag af de ovenfor anførte betragtninger skal jeg foreslå Domstolen at besvare det stillede spørgsmål således:
After concluding that the first question submitted by the Hight court should be answered in the affirmative (see below), the Advocate General went on to say that whilst it is true that the right of Community citizens to receive services in another Member State includes the right to receive, in their own Member States, information concerning the providers of such services established in other Member States and the manner in which to contact them, the fact nevertheless remains that imperative reasons connected with the public interest exist which may justify limitations of that right.
Fællesskabsretten skal fortolkes således, at den er til hinder for en afgift som den, hovedsagen drejer sig om, i tilfælde hvor:
In those circumstances, the prohibition of distributing the information in question is justified under Community law in so far as it relates to a policy choice of a moral and philosophical nature the assessment of which is a matter for the Member States and in respect of which they are entitled to invoke the ground of public policy referred to in Article 56 read together with Article 66 of the EEC Treaty, in other words, according to the definition which has been adopted by the Court, "a genuine and sufficiently serious threat to the requirements of public policy affecting one of the fundamental interests of society".
- afgiften opkræves ved indførsel af afledte kornprodukter, men godtgøres ved fremstilling af de samme afledte produkter på det indenlandske område;
Accordingly, a Member State is entitled, within its area of discretion, to regard a prohibition on the provision of information to pregnant women, in so far as it concerns only information which assists pregnant women to terminate unborn life, as being useful and indispensable and not disproportionate to the aim sought, since that aim is intended to effectuate a value-judgment, enshrined in its Constitution, attaching high priority to the protection of unborn life.
- afgiften virker som en hindring for, at de mekanismer, der er fastsat i den pågældende fælles markedsordning, fungerer."
Finally, the Advocate General considered whether the prohibition at issue was compatible with the general principles of Community law concerning fundamental rights and freedoms, stressing the importance of balancing two
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning vedrørende den støtte, som den italienske regering har ydet to statsejede virksomheder.
27 fundamental rights: on the one hand, the right to life as defined by the Member State which declares it applicable to life in the womb, and, on the other, freedom of expression, which is one of the general principles of Community law by virtue of the constitutional traditions of the Member States and the European and other international instruments concerned with fundamental rights, in particular Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 12. juni 199ΤΊ
He concluded in that regard that it is apparent from Article 10 (2) of the European Convention and the case-law of the European Court and the European Commission of Human Rights that the Member States may impose on freedom of expression such restrictions "as are prescribed by law" and that the restriction applied in Ireland was prescribed by law and was not disproportionate having regard to the objective pursued.
Hans forslag lød således:
He concluded:
"Jeg foreslår Domstolen at afsige f ri findelsesdom i annullationssøgsmålet vedrørende den anfægtede beslutning og at pålægge den italienske regering at betale sagens omkostninger."
"I therefore propose that the Court should answer the questions put by the national court in the following terms:
Kommissionens ansvar for urigtig gennemførelse i den nationale retsorden af Rådets direktiv 83/515/EØF om visse foranstaltninger med henblik på tilpasning af kapaciteten i fiskeriet - nægtelse af at udbetale en præmie for definitiv oplægning af fiskefartøjer.
The medical operation, normally performed for remuneration, by which the pregnancy of a woman coming from another Member State is terminated in compliance with the law of the Member State in which the operation is carried out is a (cross-border) service within the meaning of Article 60 of the EEC Treaty.
1. realitetsbehandler sagen og statuerer, at Fællesskabet har pådraget sig ansvar uden for kontraktsforhold derved, at Kommissionen i beslutning 84/17/EØF af 22. december 1983 godkendte Fishing Vessels (Financial Assistance) Scheme 1983 i Det Forenede Kongerige i strid med artikel 7, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 83/515/EØF af 4. oktober 1983 om visse foranstaltninger med henblik på tilpasning af kapaciteten i fiskeriet,
The Treaty provisions with regard to the freedom to provide services do not prevent a Member State where the protection of unborn life is recognized in the Constitution and in its legislation as a fundamental principle from imposing a general prohibition, applying to everyone regardless of their nationality or place of establishment, on the provision of assistance to pregnant women, regardless of their nationality, with a view to the termination of their pregnancy, more specifically through the distribution of information as to the identity and location of and method of communication with clinics located in another Member State where abortions are carried out, even though the services of medical termination of pregnancy and the information relating thereto are provided in accordance with the law in force in that second Member State."
- 28 - se om, at udgifter afholdt ved interventionsopkøb af olivenoliepartier ikke kan tages i betragtning.
- 28 - charge intended to cover intervention and storage expenses in the cereals market.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 18. juni 1991"
Mr Advocate General Jean Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 11 June 1991.
"Jeg skal derfor foreslå Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål således:
"On the basis of the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court give the following answer to the question submitted:
- på fællesskabsrettens nuværende stadium skal artikel 3, stk. 2, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3472/85 af 10. december 1985 fortolkes således, at den organoleptiske undersøgelse af jomfruolie på interventionstidspunktet gennemføres i henhold til nationale procedurer, som udelukkende skal påvise de karakteristika, der ifølge fællesskabsbestemmelserne anvendes i forbindelse med fastlæggelse af opkøbsprisen for de betegnelser, der fremgår af de nævnte bestemmelser;
Community law must be interpreted as prohibiting a charge of the kind at issue in the main proceedings where: the financial resources deriving from the charge are wholly or partly appropriated to expenses which are of benefit exclusively to domestic producers; the charge is levied on the importation of products derived from cereals but reimbursed upon manufacture of the same products within national territory; the charge has the effect of impeding the functioning of the machinery established for the purposes of the common market organization in question."
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Bundesfinanzhof. Fortolkning af artikel 3 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1224/80 om varers toldværdi - provision til en købskommissionær, der handler i eget navn, men for andenmands regning.
Annulment of the Commission decision on the grant by the Italian Government of aid to two Italian public undertakings.
Generaladvokat Jean Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Fjerde Afdeling) den 20. juni 1991.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 12 June 1991.
"På baggrund af de ovenfor anførte betragtninger skal jeg foreslå Domstolen at besvare Bundesfinanzhofs spørgsmål således:
"I propose that the Court dismiss the application for annulment and order the Italian Government to pay the costs".
Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Bundesfinanzhof. Gyldigheden af Kommissionens beslutning 83/348/EØF - toldfritagelse for videnskabelige apparater - elektronisk mikroskop - tilsvarende videnskabelig værdi - anmodning om at Domstolen tager sin hidtidige praksis op til fornyet overvejelse.
the Court declare the action admissible and find that the Community has incurred non-contractual liability, in so far as the Commission, by decision 84/17/EEC of 22 December 1983, approved the Fishing Vessels (Financial Assistance) Scheme 1983 of the United Kingdom in breach of Article 7(1) of Council Directive 83/515/EEC of 4 October 1983 on certain action for the adjustment of capacity in the fishing industry,
12.6.1991 Traktatbrud - artiklerne 73 og 75 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 -afslag på udbetaling af børnetilskud til arbejdstagere på førtidspension, der bor uden for nederlandsk område.
that the Court invite the parties to forward to it, within six months after delivery of its judgement, the figures for compensation, arrived at by agreement, failing which, to forward to the Court, within the same time limit, figures for their respective claims;
Fortolkning af Bruxelles-konventionens artikler 37 og 38 - den behandlende rets anvendelse af beføjelserne i artikel 38.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 18 June 1991.
18.6.1991 Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Tribunale civile di Roma.
"Consequently, I propose that the Court rule as follows:
Fortolkning og gyldighed af artikel 8, stk. 2, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2373/83 om gennemførelsesbestemmelserne for destillation som omhandlet i artikel 11 i forordning (EØF) nr. 337/79 for produktionsåret 1983/1984 - fortolkning af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3501/83 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 2373/83 - følgerne af overskridelse af fristen i førstnævnte forordnings artikel 8 - proportionalitetsprincippet .
As Community Law stands at present, Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation No. 3472/85 of 10 December 1985 must be interpreted as meaning that the organoleptic examination of virgin olive oil upon purchase for intervention is to be carried out in accordance with national procedures which must be designed exclusively to establish the characteristics laid down by the community provisions for
Fortolkning af artikel 3 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1697/79 om efteropkrævning af import- eller eksportafgifter, der ikke er opkrævet hos debitor for varer, der er angivet til en toldprocedure, som medfører en forpligtelse til at betale sådanne afgifter - "handlinger, der vil kunne undergives strafferetlig forfølgning".
Where it is established that an agent, who acted in his own name, in fact represented the importer and acted on the letter's behalf, there is only one sale within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1224/80 of 28 May 1980 on the customs value of goods, namely the sale by the manufacturer or supplier to the importer of the goods.
(Τj enestemandssag) Pension - verificering hvert femte år af justeringskoefficienterne (Fjerde Afdeling)
Case T-54/90 Lacroix -ν- Commission, 11 June 1991
Ugen 24.-28. juni 1991
Week of 24 to 28 June 1991
* DENNE PUBLIKATION UDARBEJDES AF DOMSTOLENS INFORMATIONSTJENESTE MED HENBLIK PX EN HURTIG ORIENTERING OH ARBEJDET VED DOMSTOLEN 06 RETTEN I FØRSTE INSTANS.
THIS BULLETIN IS PREPARED BY THE INFORMATION SERVICE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE IN ORDER TO SUPPLY READERS WITH RAPID INFORMATION ON THE WORK OF THE INSTITUTION.
DOMMENE OG DE FREMSATTE FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE OFFENTLIGGØRES SENERE I "SAMLING AF AFGØRELSER", SOM ER ENESTE GYLDIGE UDGAVE.
HOWEVER, ONLY THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS PUBLISHED LATER IN REPORTS OF CASES BEFORE THE COURT IS AUTHENTIC.
GENGIVELSE KAN SKE HED KILDEANGIVELSE.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS BULLETIN MAY BE PRODUCED PROVIDED THAT THE SOURCE IS STATED.
Sag T-120/89 Stahlwerke Peine-Salzgitter AG mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber EKSF
Case T-120/89 Stahlwerke Peine Salzgitter AG ν Commission of the European Communities (ECSC)
Sagerne C-152/89 og C-153/89: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod henholdsvis Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg og Kongeriget Belgien
Cases C-152/89 and C-153/89: Commission of the European Communities ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Kingdom of Belgium - 26 June 1991 (Full Court) (Taxation - Excise duty on beer - Export refund - Countervailing duty on imports)
Ved stævninger, indgivet den 27. april 1989, havde Kommissionen anlagt to sager med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg og Kongeriget Belgien har tilsidesat deres forpligtelser i henhold til EØF­Traktatens artikler 95 og 96, idet de ved udligningen af punktafgiften af øl ved import og godtgørelsen af punktafgiften af Øl ved eksport sætter det svind, der opstår under fremstillingen fra urten til det endelige produkt, til en sats, der overstiger det gennemsnitlige svind i den luxembourgske og den belgiske Ølindustri og uder alle omstændigheder overstiger svindet i visse luxembourgske og belgiske bryggerier.
By applications lodged on 27 April 1989 the Commission brought two actions for a declaration that by using, for the purposes of countervailing duty on imports and refunds of duty on exports of beer, a rate of wastage incurred between the wort and the finished product which exceeds the average rate found in the Luxembourg and Belgian brewing industries and in any event exceeds that of Luxembourg and Belgian breweries, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of Belgium have failed to fulfil their obligations under Articles 95 and 96 of the EEC Treaty.