natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
»Da formålet med indrømmelsen af eksportrestitutioner er at åbne mulighed for, at landbrugsprodukter fra Fællesskabet kan konkurrere med tredjelandes produkter på de ydre markeder, ville det være uforeneligt med fællesskabsforordningen vedrø­rende eksportrestitutioner at yde sådanne restitutioner til eksport, som ikke er be­stemt for markedet i et tredjeland, men til genindførsel i Fællesskabet med fritagelse for de afgifter, som almindeligvis opkræves ved indførsel af landbrugsprodukter.
"Since the objective of granting export refunds was to permit agricultural pro­ducts of Community origin to compete with the products of nonmember countries on markets outside the Community, it would be incompatible with the Community system of export refunds to grant such refunds for exports which were not intended for the market of a nonmember country but for reimportation into the Community free of the levies normally charged on the importation of agricultural products.
Så­danne forhold kan føre til et betydeligt tab for Udviklings­ og Garantifonden for Landbruget og fordreje konkurrencen på det indre marked.«
Such transactions would be likely to cause a clear loss for agricultural guidance and guar­antee funds and to distort competition on the domestic market."
Rådels forordning (EØF) nr. 536/76 af 15. marts 1976 om obligatorisk opkøb af skummetmælkspulver, som interventionsorganerne ligger inde med, og som skal anvendes i foder (EFT 1976 L 67, s. 18).
Council Regulation (EEC) No 563/76 of 15 March 1976 on the compulsory purchase of skimmed-milk powder held by intervention agencies for use in feedingstuffs (Official Journal 1976, L 67, p. 18).
Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 677/76 af 26. marts 1976 om visse gennemførelsesbestemmelser for den i forordning (EØF) nr. 563/76 fastsatte ordning vedrørende obligatorisk opkøb af skummetmælkspulver (EFT 1976 L81, s. 23).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 677/76 of 26 March 1976 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system for compulsory purchase of skimmed-milk powder provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 563/76 (Official Journal 1976, L 81, p. 23).
Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 192/75 af 17. januar 1975 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for eksport­restitutioner for landbrugsprodukter (EFT 1975 L25, s. 1).
Regulation (EEC) No 192/75 of the Commission of 17 January 1975 laying down detailed rules for the appli­cation of export refunds in respect of agricultural products (Official Journal 1975, L 25, p. 1).
Jfr. tilsvarende: Dom af 17. december 1981: sag 279/80, Webb, Sml.
See also: Judgment of 17 December 1981, Case 279/80, Webb, [1981] ECR 3305, 3324 (Opinion: Slynn, p. 3328).
Den bør derfor betragtes som en tjenesteydelse i denne bestemmelses forstand.«
Accordingly they must be considered a 'service' within the meaning of that provision."
Dom af 17. december 1981: sag 279/80, Webb, Sml.
Judgment of 17 December 1981, Case 279/80, Webb, [1981] ECR 3305, 3323 (Opinion: Slynn, p. 3328).
13. »Selv om det er korrekt, at de arbejdstagere, der beskæftiges af vikarbureauer, i påkommende tilfælde er omfattet af bestemmelserne i traktatens artikler 48­51 og de til deres gennemførelse udstedte fællesskabsforordninger, bevirker dette forhold ikke, at de virksomheder, der beskæftiger disse arbejdstagere, ikke længere kan be­tragtes som virksomheder, der udfører tjenesteydelser i den i traktatens artikler 59 og ff. anførte betydning.
"Whilst employees of agencies for the supply of manpower may in certain cir­cumstances be covered by the provisions of Articles 48 to 51 of the Treaty and the Community regulations adopted in implementation thereof, that does not prevent undertakings ofthat nature which employ such workers from being undertakings en­gaged in the provision of services, which therefore come within the scope of the provisions of Article 59 et seq. of the Treaty.
Som allerede fastslået af Domstolen ... kan visse tjenestey­delsers særlige beskaffenhed ikke bevirke, at disse aktiviteter ikke omfattes af be­stemmelserne vedrørende den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser.«
As the Court has already declared,... the special nature of certain services does not remove them from the ambit of the rules on the freedom to supply services."
Dette indebærer imidlertid ikke, at hele den nationale lovgivning, der anvendes i forhold til denne stats egne borgere, og som i almindelighed regulerer de i denne stat etablerede virk­somheders løbende aktiviteter, fuldt ud på samme måde kan bringes i anvendelse på aktiviteter af midlertidig art, der udøves af virksomheder, der er etableret i andre medlemsstater.
However, it does not mean that all national legislation applicable to nationals ofthat State and usually applied to the permanent activities of undertakings established therein may be similarly applied in its entirety to the temporary activities of undertakings which are established in other Member States.
Domstolen har ... udtalt, at i betragtning af, at visse tjenesteydelser er af speciel ka­rakter, kan særlige krav til tjenesteyderne, der er begrundet i anvendelse af faglige regler, ikke anses for uforenelige med traktaten.
[In a previous decision] the Court held that, regard being had to the particular nature of certain services, specific requirements imposed on the provider of the services cannot be considered incompatible with the Treaty where they have as their purpose the application of rules governing such activities.
Den frie udveksling af tjenesteydel­ser, der er et grundlæggende princip i traktaten, kan dog kun begrænses ved regler, der er begrundet i almenvellet, og som påhviler enhver person eller enhver virksom­hed, der udøver en aktivitet på denne stats område, i det omfang disse interesser ikke varetages i kraft af bestemmelser, som tjenesteyderen er undergivet i den med­lemsstat, hvor han er etableret.«
However, the freedom to provide services is one of the fundamental principles of the Treaty and may be restricted on­ly by provisions which are justified by the general good and which are imposed on all persons or undertakings operating in the said State in so far as that interest is not safeguarded by the provisions to which the provider of the service is subject in the Member State of his establishment."
Dom af 17. december 1981: sag 279/80, Webb, Sml. 1981, s.3305, 3324f.
Judgment of 17 December 1981, Case 279/80, Webb, [1981] ECR 3305, 3324 (Opinion: Slynn, p. 3328).
15. »... medlemsstaterne [kan] i almenvellets berettigede interesser ... vælge den po­litik at gøre udlejning af arbejdskraft på deres område betinget af en bevilling, som kan nægtes, såfremt der er grund til at frygte, at en sådan virksomhed vil skade for­holdene på arbejdsmarkedet, eller at arbejdstagernes interesser ikke vil blive tilgode­set i tilstrækkeligt omfang.
15. "... it is permissible for Member States, and amounts for them to a legitimate choice of policy pursued in the public interest, to subject the provision of manpower within their borders to a system of licensing in order to be able to refuse licences where there is reason to fear that such activities may harm good relations on the labour market or that the interests of the workforce affected are not adequately safe­guarded.
I betragtning af de forskelle, der kan bestå mellem forhol­dene på arbejdsmarkedet i de forskellige medlemsstater, og de forskelligartede krite­rier, der anlægges ved bedømmelsen af denne form for virksomhed, er der intet til hinder for, at den medlemsstat, hvori tjenesteydelsen præsteres, kræver, at tjenestey­deren skal have en bevilling, der udstedes på grundlag af de kriterier, der gælder for dens egne statsborgere.
In view of the differences there may be in conditions on the labour market between one Member State and another, on the one hand, and the diversity of the criteria which may be applied with regard to the pursuit of activities of that nature on the other hand, the Member State in which the services are to be supplied has un­questionably the right to require possession of a licence issued on the same condi­tions as in the case of its own nationals.
Et sådant krav ville imidlertid gå ud over det tilsigtede mål, såfremt de betingelser, der stilles for udstedelse af bevilling, blot ville være en gentagelse af den dokumen­tation og den sikkerhed, der kræves i etableringsstaten.
Such a measure would be excessive in relation to the aim pursued, however, if the requirements to which the issue of a licence is subject coincided with the proofs and guarantees required in the State of establishment.
Overholdelsen af princippet om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser kræver dels, at medlemsstaten, hvor tjenestey­delsen udføres, ikke under behandlingen af ansøgningen om og udstedelsen af bevil­linger udsætter tjenesteyderen for en forskelsbehandling på grundlag af nationalitet eller etableringssted, dels, at den tager hensyn til de krav om dokumentation og sik­kerhed, som tjenesteyderen allerede må opfylde i udførelsen af sin virksomhed i den medlemsstat, hvor han er etableret.«
In order to maintain the principle of freedom to provide services the first requirement is that in considering applica­tions for licences and in granting them the Member State in which the service is to be provided may not make any distinction based on the nationality of the provider of the services or the place of his establishment ; the second requirement is that it must take into account the evidence and guarantees already furnished by the provider of the services for the pursuit of his activities in the Member State of his establish­ment."
Dom af 17. december 1981: sag 279/80, Webb, Sml. 1981, s.3305, 3325f.
Judgment of 17 December 1981, Case 279/80, Webb, [1981] ECR 3305, 3325 (Opinion: Slynn, p. 3328).
Jfr. tilsvarende: Dom af 2. juli 1981 : foren, sager 116, 117, 119, 120 og 121/80, ONPTS/Celestre, Sml.
See also: Judgment of 2 July 1981, Joined Cases 116, 117, 119, 120 and 121/80, R WP ν Celestre, [1981] ECR 1737, 1753 (Opinion: Slynn, p. 1757).
Ved denne praksis har Domstolen fastslået, at når ydel­sen af den fulde nationale pension i tilknytning til en anvendelse af de nationale anti­kumulationsregler viser sig at være mere fordelagtig for arbejdstageren end fælles­skabsrettens regler om sammenlægning og forholdsmæssig beregning, er det den na­tionale lovgivning, der finder anvendelse i sin fulde udstrækning.
In its decisions the Court has held that when the grant of the full national pension upon the application of national rules against overlapping ben­efits is more favourable to a worker than the rules on aggregation and apportionment contained in the Community regulations, the national legislation is wholly applica­ble.
Selv om denne praksis kan medføre en nedsættelse af størrelsen af de ydelser, der tildeles arbejdsta­geren i medfør af flere medlemsstaters lovgivninger, hviler den på det princip, at ar­bejdstageren i det mindste har krav på at oppebære den mest fordelagtige fulde pen­sion, som han er berettiget til alene i medfør af en medlemsstats lovgivning.
Although that case-law might entail a reduction in the amount of benefits grant­ed to a worker under the laws of several Member States, the underlying principle is that a worker should receive at least the whole amount of the most favourable pen­sion to which he is entitled under the legislation of a single Member State.
Når der tildeles en arbejdstager fuld pension alene efter en medlemsstats lovgivning, og der efter fællesskabsretlige bestemmelser tillige tildeles den pågældende en pen­sion i en anden medlemsstat, hvis beløb fradrages den fulde pension, som ydes af den kompetente institution i den første medlemsstat, er det derfor uforeneligt med trak­tatens artikel 51 at anvende denne lovgivning på en måde, der for en given periode giver mulighed for, at tilbagebetalingen til den første medlemsstats kompetente insti­tution af foreløbigt udbetalte beløb til den ydelsesberettigede overstiger det pensions­beløb eller de forfaldne pensionsydelser, som er overført til denne institution af den anden medlemsstats sociale sikringsinstitution, og som er omregnet til den første medlemsstats valuta på overførselsdatoen.«
Therefore, when a full pension is granted to a worker under the national legislation of Member State A alone and, in implementation of Community rules, he is also awarded a pension in Member State Β which is reduced by the amount of the full pen­sion granted by the competent institution in Member State A, it is not compatible with Article 51 of the Treaty for that legislation to be applied in a way which in any given period would allow the amount of the advance payments made to the recipient recovered by the competent institution in Member State A to exceed the amount of pension or arrears of pension transferred to that institution by the social security in­stitution in Member State Β and converted into Member State A's national currency on the date of transfer."
KONKURRENCE ­ REGLERNES HÅNDHÆVELSE
EEC ­ COMPETITION ­ APPLICATION OF THE RULES
Kommissionens administrative procedure er udformet med henblik på at give de på­gældende virksomheder mulighed for at gøre deres synspunkter gældende og at for­syne Kommissionen med så fyldige oplysninger som muligt, inden den træffer en beslutning, der berører virksomhedernes interesser.
The procedure was designed to enable the undertakings concerned to communicate their views and to provide the Commission with the fullest information possible be­fore it adopted a decision affecting the interests of an undertaking.
Den skal yde virksomhederne visse processuelle garantier og skal, som det fremgår af 11. betragtning i præamblen til forordning nr. 17, sikre deres ret til at udtale sig over for Kommissionen.
Its purpose is to create procedural guarantees for the benefit of the latter and, as may be seen in the eleventh recital in the preamble to Regulation No 17, to ensure that the undertak­ings have the right to be heard by the Commission.
Af denne grund skal der i medfør af artikel 19, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 17 — også for at sikre retten til at varetage sit forsvar — gives den pågældende virksomhed ret til ved afslutningen af undersøgelsen at udtale sig om alle de klagepunkter, Kommis­sionen påtænker at opretholde mod virksomheden i sin beslutning, og følgelig skal virksomheden underrettes om sådanne klagepunkter i det i artikel 2 i forordning nr. 99/63 omhandlede dokument.
That is why in accordance with Article 19 (1) of Regulation No 17 and in order to guarantee observance of the rights of the defence, it is necessary to ensure that the undertaking concerned has the right to submit its observations on conclusion of the inquiry on all the objections which the Commission intends to raise against it in its decision and, therefore, to inform it of those objections in the document which is provided for in Article 2 of Regulation No 99/63.
Dette er endvidere grunden til, at indledningen af en procedure i medfør af de nævnte bestemmelser — for at bortvejre en eventuel tvivl angående den pågældende virksomheds stilling under sagen — tydeligt markeres ved en akt, som udtrykker, at det påtænkes at træffe en beslutning.«
That is why, too, in order to re­move any doubt as to the procedural position of the undertaking in question, initia­tion of the procedure under the abovementioned provisions is clearly marked by an act manifesting the intention to take a decision."
Dom af 11. november 1981: sag 60/81, IBM/Kommissionen, Sml. 1981, s. 2639,
Judgment of 11 November 1981, Case 60/81, IBM ν Commission.
Jfr. tilsvarende: Kendelse af 7. juli 1981: foren, sager 60 og 190/81 R, IBM/Kommissionen, Sml. 1981, s. 1857, 1863 f.
See also: Order of 7 July 1981, Joined Cases 60 and 190/81 R, ¡BM ν Commission, [1981] ECR 1857, 1863.
FÆLLESSKABSRETTEN - NATIONAL RET
EEC — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ­ REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING
Det er derfor kun muligt at afvise en anmodning fra en national ret, hvis det viser sig, at den for­tolkning af fællesskabsretten eller den efterprøvelse af en fællesskabsregels gyldig­hed, som den pågældende ret har anmodet om, åbenbart savner enhver forbindelse med realiteten i hovedsagen eller dennes genstand.«
Consequently, a request from a national court may be rejected only if it is quite obvious that the interpreta­tion of Community law or the examination of the validity of a rule of Community law sought by that court bears no relation to the actual nature of the case or to the subject­matter of the main action."
Dom af 16. juni 1981 : sag 126/80, Salonia/Poidomani og Giglio, Sml. 1981, s. 1563, 1576f.
Judgment of 16 June 1981, Case 126/80, Salonia ν Poidomani and Giglio, [1981] ECR 1563, 1576 (Opinion: Reischl, p. 1584).
Når en national ret forespørger Domstolen om gyldigheden af en fællesskabsfor­ordning og i den forbindelse angiver visse omstændigheder, der kan medføre for­ordningens ugyldighed, er Domstolen ikke bundet af disse oplysninger, ligesom den kan se sig foranlediget til først at undersøge, om andre omstændigheder, som den nationale ret ikke har været opmærksom på, f. eks. manglende begrundelse, kan på­virke forordningens gyldighed.
Where a national court refers a question to the Court of Justice on the validity of a Community regulation and puts forward certain possible grounds for its inva­lidity, the Court is not bound by those grounds and may decide to consider in the first place an irregularity capable of affecting the validity of the regulation which was not considered by the national court, such as the lack of an adequate statement of reasons.
30. »... det tilkommer den nationale domstol — under hensyn til, at den skal tage stilling til sagens faktiske omstændigheder og skal bære ansvaret for den afgørelse, der skal træffes — at vurdere, om del under hensyn til sagens omstændigheder er nødvendigt at lade et præjudicielt spørgsmål afgøre, for at den kan afsige dom.
30. "... it is for the national court — by reason of the fact that it is seized of the sub­stance of the dispute and that it must bear the responsibility for the decision to be taken — to assess, having regard to the facts of the case, the need to obtain a preli­minary ruling to enable it to give judgment.
Ved anvendelsen af denne skønsmæssige beføjelse udøver den nationale domstol i samarbejde med Domstolen en virksomhed, der er tillagt dem i fællesskab med henblik på at værne om lov og ret ved anvendelsen og fortolkningen af traktaten.
In exercising that power of appraisal the national court, in collaboration with the Court of Justice, fulfils a duty entrusted to them both of ensuring that in the interpre­tation and application of the Treaty the law is observed.
De problemer, der kan opstå i forbindelse med den nationale domstols udøvelse af sine skønsmæssige beføjelser, og dens forhold til Domstolen i forbindelse med arti­kel 177 henhører herefter alene under fællesskabsrettens regler.
Accordingly the problems which may be entailed in the exercise of its power of appraisal by the national court and the relations which it maintains within the framework of Article 177 with the Court of Justice are governed exclusively by the provisions of Community law.
Med henblik på at give Domstolen mulighed for at udfylde sin rolle i overensstem­melse med traktaten, er det ubetinget nødvendigt, at de nationale retsinstanser i til­
In order that the Court of Justice may perform its task in accordance with the Treaty it is essential for national courts to explain, when the reasons do not emerge beyond
EØF ­ DOMSTOLSKONTROLLEN ­ PRÆJUDICIELLE SAGER fælde, hvor grundene til, at de finder, aten besvarelse af deres spørgsmål er nødven­dig for tvistens løsning ikke klart fremgår af sagen, redegør for disse.
EEC - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING any doubt from the file, why they consider that a reply to their questions is necessary to enable them to give judgment.
Det må nemlig fremhæves, at artikel 177 ikke tillægger Domstolen som opgave at udøve responderende virksomhed vedrørende generelle eller hypotetiske spørgsmål, men at bidrage til justitsforvaltningen i medlemsstaterne.
It must in fact be emphasized that the duty assigned to the Court by Article 177 is not that of delivering advisory opinions on general or hypothetical questions but of assisting in the administration of justice in the Member States.
Domstolen savner således kompetence til at besvare fortolkningsspørgsmål, der stilles i forbindelse med pro­cessuelle arrangementer, som parterne har konstrueret med henblik på at formå Domstolen til at tage stilling til nærmere bestemte problemer i fællesskabsretten, og som ikke er udtryk for et objektivt behov i forbindelse med løsningen af en retstvist.
It accordingly does not have jurisdiction to reply to questions of interpretation which are submitted to it within the framework of procedural devices arranged by the parties in order to in­duce the Court to give its views on certain problems of Community law which do not correspond to an objective requirement inherent in the resolution of a dispute.
Fastslår Domstolen i et sådant tilfælde, at den savner kompetence, er der på ingen måde tale om et indgreb i den nationale domstols kompetenceområde, men om at af­værge, at artikel 177­proceduren anvendes til andre formål end dem, hvortil den er beregnet.
A declaration by the Court that it has no jurisdiction in such circumstances does not in any way trespass upon the prerogatives of the national court but makes it possible to prevent the application of the procedure under Article 177 for purposes other than those appropriate for it.
Det bemærkes endvidere, at selv om Domstolen i videst muligt omfang bør kunne overlade de nationale domstole at bedømme nødvendigheden af de spørgsmål, der forelægges den, må Domstolen have mulighed for at foretage en tilbundsgående vurdering af spørgsmål i forbindelse med dens egen funktion, bl. a. med henblik på at efterprøve sin egen kompetence, således som det påhviler enhver retsinstans.
Furthermore, it should be pointed out that, whilst the Court of Justice must be able to place as much reliance as possible upon the assessment by the national court of the extent to which the questions submitted are essential, it must be in a position to make any assessment inherent in the performance of its own duties in particular [in order to check, as all the courts must,] whether it has jurisdiction.
Derfor må Domstolen, når henses til virkningerne af dens afgørelser på området, ved udøvelsen af den dømmende myndighed, den har fået tillagt ved artikel 177, tage hensyn ikke alene til de i sagen deltagende parters interesser, men også til Fæl­lesskabets og medlemsstaternes interesser.
Thus the Court, taking into account the repercussions of its decisions in this matter, must have re­gard, in exercising the jurisdiction conferred upon it by Article 177, not only to the interests of the parties to the proceedings but also to those of the Community and of the Member States.
Domstolen kan således ikke uden at tilsi­desætte sine forpligtelser forholde sig passivt over for medlemsstaternes retsinstan­sers skøn i de undtagelsestilfælde, i hvilke skønnet kan være af betydning for artikel 177­procedurens rette funktion.
Accordingly it cannot, without disregarding the duties as­signed to it, remain indifferent to the assessments made by the courts of the Member States in the exceptional cases in which such assessments may affect the proper working of the procedure laid down by Article 177.
Den samarbejdsånd, der må beherske udførelsen af de opgaver, artikel 177 pålægger henholdsvis de nationale domstole of EF­Domstolen, indebærer en pligt for Dom­stolen til at respektere de nationale domstoles eneansvarsområde, men indebærer samtidig, at de nationale domstole ved brugen af de muligheder, artikel 177 giver, tager hensyn til den opgave, som Domstolen alene varetager på området.
Whilst the spirit of cooperation which must govern the performance of the duties assigned by Article 177 to the national courts on the one hand and the Court of Jus­tice on the other requires the latter to have regard to the national court's proper re­sponsibilities, it implies at the same time that the national court, in the use which it makes of the facilities provided by Article 177, should have regard to the proper function of the Court of Justice in this field.