natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionens direktiv 93/63/EØF af 5. juli 1993
Declares that, by failing to adopt within the periods prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions needed to comply with,
For så vidt angår direktiv 93/62, 93/63, 93/64, 93/78 og 93/79 bemærkes, at Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland ikke bestrider, at den ikke har gennemført direktiverne inden for den fastsatte frist.
Advocate General P. Lener delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 16 December 1997.
Kommissionens direktiv 93/63/EØF af 5. juli 1993 om gennemførebesbestemmeber for overvågning af og kontrol med leverandører og anlæg i henhold til Rådets direktiv 91/682/EØF om afsætning af prydplanteformeringsmateriale og prydplanter
(2) Order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs, including those consequent upon the partial discontinuance of the proceedings by the Commission.
Kommissionens direktiv 93/78/EØF af 21. september 1993 om supplerende gennemførelsesbestemmelser til listerne over sorter af prydplanteformeringsmateriale og prydplanter, der føres af leverandørerne i henhold til Rådets direktiv 91/682/EØF, og
The Italian Government does not deny that it has failed to fulfil its obligations and states that the measures necessary in order to transpose the Directive arc in the course of being adopted.
Kommissionens direktiv 93/79/EØF af 21. september 1993 om supplerende gennemførelsesbestemmelser til listerne over sorter af frugtplanteformeringsmateriale og frugtplanter, der føres af leverandørerne i henhold til Rådets direktiv 92/34/EØF.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 10 September 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to adopt and/or communicate the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 (hereinafter 'the Directive'), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and the Directive.
Det er ufornødent at træffe afgørebe i sagen, for så vidt den vedrører Kommbsionens direktiv 94/3/EF af 21. januar 1994 om en procedure for meddelebe om tilbageholdelse af en forsendebe eller af en skadegører, der kommer fra et tredjeland, og som frembyder en overhængende fare for plantesundheden.
Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 thereof;
Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland betaler sagens omkostninger, herunder de omkosminger, der vedrører Kommbsionens delvise ophævelse af sagen.·
Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.'
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 16. december 1997.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 22 January 1998.
2) pålægge Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland at betale sagens omkostninger og omkostningerne i forbindelse med Kommissionens delvise ophævelse af sagen«.
(2) order the Italian Republic to pay the costs of these proceedings.
Den Italienske Republik har ikke bestridt den manglende gennemførelse, Kommissionen har påtalt, og har anført, at de nødvendige bestemmelser til gennemførelse af direktivet er ved at blive udstedt.
By judgment of 1 December 1994 the Cour du Travail (Higher Labour Court), Liège, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a number of questions on the interpretation of Council Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 (hereinafter 'the Directive').
Da gennemførelsen af direktivet ikke har fundet sted inden for den deri fastsatte frist, må det fastslås, at del af Kommissionen påståede traktatbrud er godtgjort.
By its first question, the national court essentially seeks to ascertain whether, on a proper construction of Article 1(1) of the Directive, the Directive applies in the event of the transfer of an undertaking which is being wound up voluntarily or by the court.
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens justitskontor den 10. september 1997 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til traktaten og Rådets direktiv 94/57/EF af 22. november 1994 (herefter »direktivet«), idet den ikke har vedtaget og/elier underrettet Kommissionen om de ved lov eller administrativt fastsatte bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme direktivet.
Those questions have been raised in proceedings between Jules Dcthicr Équipement SA ('Dethier'), on the one hand, and Jules Dassy and Sovam SPRL ('Sovam'), on the other, concerning payment of compensation in lieu of notice and of other sums of compensation.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 22. januar 1998.
Although liquidation may be a stage which precedes insolvency, it can also occur, as the Belgian Government states, when the members no longer wish to cooperate.
»1) fastslå, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til traktaten, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist har vedtaget de bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at gennemføre Rådets direktiv 94/57/EF af 22. november 1994 om fælles regler og standarder for organisationer, der udfører inspektion og syn af skibe, og for søfartsmyndighedemes aktiviteter i forbindelse hermed.
On 22 May 1992 Mr Dassy brought an action before the Tribunal du Travail (Labour Court), Huy, for Sovam and Dcthicr to be held jointly and severally liable to pay the sums due to him by way of compensation in lieu of notice, paid holiday leave and end-of-ycar bonuses. He contended that the transfer of the undertaking was contractual and that Dcthicr was therefore jointly and severally liable for those payments.
2) pålægge Den Italienske Republik at betale sagens omkostninger.'
organisational reasons or whether the transferor must also be accorded that power.
Præjudiciel »Varetagebe af arbejdstagernes rettigheder i forbindebe med overførsel af virksomheder, bedrifter eller dele af bedrifter - overførsel af en virksomhed i retslig eller frivillig likvidation - overdragers og erhververs ret til at afskedige arbejdstagere af økonombke, tekniske eller organbatoriske årsager arbejdstagere, som er blevet afskediget kort tid før overførslen, og som ikke overtages af erhververen· (Sjette Afdeling)
The Court has held that employees whose contract of employment or employment relationship comes to an end with effect from a date prior to that of the transfer, contrary to Article 4(1), must be regarded as still employed by the undertaking on the date of the transfer, with the result, in particular, that the employer's obligations towards them are automatically transferred from the transferor to the transferee.
Ved dom af 1. december 1994 har Cour du travail de Liège forelagt præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets direktiv 77/187/EØF af 14. februar 1977 (herefter •direktivet«).
Accordingly, inasmuch as Article 4(1) precludes dismissals from taking place solely by reason of the transfer, it does not restrict the power of the transferor any more than that of the transferee to effect dismissals for the reasons which it allows.
Den 22. maj 1992 anlagde Jules Dassy sag ved Tribunal du travail de Huy med påstand om, at Sovam og Dethier var solidarisk ansvarlige for betalingen af hans tilgodehavender i form af fratrædelsesgodtgørelse, feriegodtgørelse og nytårsgratiale.
According to the reference by the national court, in the case of a liquidation the liquidator, although appointed by the court, is an organ of the company who sells the assets under the supervision of the general meeting; there is no special procedure for establishing liabilities under the supervision of the court; and a creditor may as a rule enforce his debt against the company and obtain judgment against it.
Til støtte herfor gjorde han gældende, at overførslen al virksomheden var sket ved aftale, og at Dethier dermed hæftede solidarisk for betalingen.
By contrast, in the case of an insolvency, the administrator, inasmuch as he represents the creditors, is a third party vis-à-vis the company and realises the assets under the supervision of the court; the liabilities of the company are established in accordance with a special procedure and individual enforcement actions are prohibited.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under en sag mellem Jules Dethier Équipement SA (herefter »Dethier«) og henholdsvis Jules Dassy og Sovam SPRL (herefter »Sovam«) i likvidation vedrørende udbetaling af en fratrædelsesgodtgørelse samt visse andre godtgørelser.
It is thus apparent that the situation of an undertaking being wound up by the court presents considerable differences from that of an undertaking subject to insolvency proceedings and that the reasons which have led the Court to rule out application of the Directive in the latter situation may be absent in the case of an undertaking being wound up by the court.
Med det første spørgsmål ønsker den forelæggende ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om direktivets artikel 1, stk. 1, skal fortolkes således, at direktivet finder anvendelse på overførsel af en virksomhed i retslig eller frivillig likvidation.
First, it follows from the judgment in Boric International and Others that employees dismissed before the undertaking was transferred, contrary to Article 4(1), must be regarded as still employed by the undertaking on the date of the transfer.
Jules Dassy havde siden 1974 været ansat i Sovam.
That is the case where, as in the main proceedings, the undertaking continues to trade while it is being wound up by the court.
Den 15. maj 1991 traf Tribunal de commerce de Huy afgørelse om retslig likvidation og udnævnte en likvidator.
In such circumstances continuity of the business is assured when the undertaking is transferred.
Den 5. juni 1991 blev Jules Dassy afskediget af likvidator.
There is accordingly no justification for depriving the employees of the rights which the Directive guarantees them on the conditions it lays down.
Det afgørende kriterium for bedømmelsen af, om en overførsel af en virksomhed, for hvilken der er iværksat en administrativ eller retslig procedure, er omfattet af direktivets anvendelsesområde, er det formål, der forfølges med den pågældende procedure.
Secondly, it is settled case-law that the rules of the Directive, in particular those concerning the protection of workers against dismissal by reason of the transfer, must be considered to be mandatory, so that it is not possible to derogate from them in a manner unfavourable to employees.
Der bør endvidere tages hensyn til de nærmere regler for den pågældende procedure, særligt de regler, der vedrører spørgsmålet om,
Therefore, the contract of employment of a person unlawfully dismissed shortly before the transfer must be regarded as still extant as against the transferee even if the dismissed employee was not taken on by him after the undertaking was transferred.
Den 27. juni 1991 overdrog likvidator Sovam's aktiver til Dethier i medfør af en aftale, som Tribunal de commerce godkendte den 10. juli 1991.
By the first part of the second question, the national court essentially asks whether, on a proper construction of Article 4(1) of the Directive, only the transferee may dismiss employees for economic, technical or
1 et sådant tilfælde fortsættes driften på det tidspunkt, hvor virksomheden overføres. Som følge heraf er der intet grundlag for at afskære arbejdstagerne fra at gøre deres rettigheder i medfør af direktivet gældende på de i direktivet fastsatte betingelser.
On a proper construction of Article 1(1) of CouncU Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 on the approximation of the laws of the Member Stales relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses, that directive applies in the event of the transfer of an undertaking which is being wound up by the court if the undertaking continues to trade.
I den foreliggende sag fremgår det af oplysningerne fra den nationale ret, at den belgiske procedure for retslig likvidation tager sigte på en likvidation gennem afhændelse af aktiverne til fordel for selskabet selv, subsidiært til fordel for eventuelle kreditorer.
On a proper construction of Article 4(1) of Directive 77/187, both the transferor and the transferee may dismiss employees for economic, technical or organisational reasons.
Likvidationen kan ganske vist være en procedure, der går forud for en konkurs, men den kan, som anført af den belgiske regering, også benyttes, når selskabsdeltagerne ikke længere vil samarbejde.
Employees unlawfully dismissed by the transferor shortly before the undertaking is transferred and not taken on by the transferee may claim, as against the transferee, that their dismissal was unlawful'
Hertil bemærkes, at artikel 4, stk. 1, beskytter arbejdstagere mod afskedigelser, som alene begrundes med overførslen, såvel i forhold til overdrageren som i forhold til erhververen.
(1) Council Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in lhe event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses applies to a transfer effected by a company in voluntary liquidation, but only on condition that the undertaking continues lo trade in that context.
Eftersom formålet med den retslige likvidationsprocedure ikke giver tilstrækkelige anvisninger for bedømmelsen, er der grund til at se nærmere på procedurens indhold.
This applies irrespective of whether the liquidator is appointed by the court or by the general meeting.
Heraf følger, at selv om direktivels artikel 4, stk. 1, er til hinder for afskedigelser, som alene skyldes overførslen, begrænser bestemmelsen ikke overdragerens beføjelse til at foretage afskedigelser af årsager, som direktivet anerkender, i videre omfang end erhververens.
(2) The liquidator, too, has the right to dismiss employees for economic, technical or organisational reasons.
Derimod er kurator, for så vidt som han under en konkurs repræsenterer kreditorerne, en tredjepart i forhold til selskabet og skal realisere aktiverne under dommerens tilsyn, og selskabets passiver skal således opgøres efter en særlig procedure, ligesom individuelle tvangsfuldbyrdelsesskridt ikke kan foretages.
Staff not taken on by the transferee may not claim, as against him, that their dismissal was unlawful merely because shortly after ihcir dismissal the business was transferred as an economic entity.
Med den anden del af det andet spørgsmål ønsker den nationale ret nærmere bestemt oplyst, om arbejdstagere, som retsstridigt er blevet afskediget af overdrageren kort lid før overførslen af virksomheden, og som ikke overtages af erhververen, over for erhververen kan påberåbe sig, at afskedigelsen er retsstridig.
When assessing the legality of dismissals on the basis of the criteria laid down by the Court of Justice, the national court must, however, take into consideration all the objective circumstances relating to the dismissals, in this case above all the fact that the company was in liquidation.
med direktivets artikel 4, stk. 1, er blevet afskediget på et tidligere tidspunkt end overførselstidspunktet, skal betragtes, som om de stadig var ansat i virksomheden på overførselstidspunktet.
Principle of non-discrimination in Reference for a preliminary ruling)
For det andet følger det af fast praksis, at direktivets regler, navnlig om beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne mod afskedigelse som følge af overførslen, må betragtes som præceptive i den forstand, at de ikke kan fraviges til ugunst for arbejdstagerne.
Preliminary ruling (EEC-Algeria Cooperation Agreement Article 39(1) the field of social security Disabled adults ' allowance (Sixth Chamber) rejected Mrs Djabali's application on the ground that she was neither French nor a national of a country which had concluded with France a reciprocal agreement concerning the grant of allowances for disabled adults.
Som følge heraf skal arbejdskontrakten, i tilfælde hvor en arbejdslager retsstridigt er blevei afskediget kort tid før overførslen, i forhold til erhververen betragtes som om den stadig bestod, selv om arbejdstageren ikke er blevet overtaget af erhververen efter virksomhedens overførsel.
On 4 June 1995 Mrs Djabali brought an action before the Tribunal des Affaires de Sécurité Sociale, Evry.
•1) Artikel 1, stk. 1, i Rådets direktiv 771187¡EØF af 14. februar 1977 om tilnærmebe af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om varetagebe af arbejdstagernes rettigheder i forbindebe med overførsel af virksomheder, bedrifter eller dele af bedrifter, skal fortolkes således, al direktivet finder anvendelse på overførsel af en virksomhed i retslig likvidation, når virksomhedens aktiviteter videreføres.
By judgment of 28 May 1996 the Tribunal des Affaires de Sécurité Sociale (Social Security Court), Evry (France), referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 39(1) of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, signed in Algiers on 26 April 1976 and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2210/78 of 26 September 1978.
Artikel 4, stk 1, i direktiv 77/87 skal fortolkes således, at beføjeben til at foretage afskedigeber af økonomiske, tekniske eller organisatoriske årsager tilkommer såvel overdrageren som erhververen.
That question was raised in proceedings between Mrs Djabali, an Algerian national, and the Caisse d'Allocations Familiales de l'Essonne ('CAF') concerning the award of a disabled adults' allowance.
Arbejdstagere, som retsstridigt er blevet afskediget af overdrageren kort lid før overførslen af virksomheden, og som ikke overluges uf erhververen, kan over for erhververen påberåbe sig, at afskedigelsen er reisstridig.·
It is clear from the wording and the scheme of Article 177 of the Treaty that a national court or tribunal is not empowered to bring a matter before the Court of Justice by way of a reference for a preliminary ruling unless a case is pending before it, in which it is called upon to give a decision which is capable of taking account of the preliminary ruling.
Han foreslog at besvare de stillede spørgsmål således:
Nevertheless, on 13 July 1994 the CAF, which is responsible for paying the benefit in question,
Det er herved uden betydning, om likvidator er udpeget af retten eller af generalforsamlingen.
It must be stated that the claims of the applicant in the main proceedings have been satisfied in full, with the result that the case pending before the national court now has no purpose.
Retten til at foretage afskedigelser af økonomiske, tekniske eller organisatoriske grunde tilkommer ligeledes likvidator.
Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the silting of the Sixth Chamber on 15 May 1997.
De af erhververen ikke-gcnantagne ansatte kan ikke over for erhververen gøre gældende, at afskedigelsen er retsstridig, blot fordi virksomheden er blevet overdraget som økonomisk enhed kort tid efter deres afskedigelse.
He considered that if, following further contact with the national court and the parties and in the light of the responses given to the Court, it transpired that the dispute which gave rise to the reference had indeed been settled and that there were no grounds for considering that a decision on the question referred was still necessary to enable the national court to give judgment, the Court should either rule that it has no jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling on the question referred or strike the case off the Register of its own motion.
Ved vurderingen af afskedigelserne ved hjælp af de af Domstolen fastsatte kriterier skal den forelæggende ret imidlertid tage alle objektive omstændigheder i forbindelse med afskedigelsen ι betragtning, i delte tilfælde navnlig den omstændighed, at selskabet var i likvidation.«
If a ruling proved still to be required, he considered that the question referred by the Tribunal des Affaires de Sécurité Sociale d'Evry should be answered as follows:
12. marts 1998
12 March 1998 obligations
Ved skrivelse af 8. april 1997 har sagsøgte i hovedsagen meddelt Domstolen, at den franske minister for arbejde og sociale anliggender i november 1996 havde besluttet at tildele Ourdia Djabali en ydelse til voksne handicappede.
The Kingdom of Belgium docs not deny that it has failed to fulfil its obligations.
Dette spørgsmål er opstået i en sag mellem fru Ourdia Djabali, der er algerisk statsborger, og Caisse d'allocations familiales de l'Essonne (herefter »sagsøgte i hovedsagen«) angående ydelser til voksne handicappede.
It states, however, that a draft royal decree intended to transpose the Directive has been submitted to the Conseil d'État (Council of State) for its opinion.
Det følger af ordlyden og opbygningen af traktatens artikel 177, at den præjudicielle procedure forudsætter, at der reelt verserer en retssag for den nationale domstol, og at denne domstol skal træffe en afgørelse, hvis udfald kan påvirkes af den præjudicielle afgørelse.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 30 April 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by not giving notification of or by not adopting the measures necessary in order to transpose Council Directive 92/74/EEC of 22 September 1992 widening the scope of Directive 81/851/EEC (hereinafter 'the Directive'), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty and the Directive.
Det må lægges til grund, at sagsøger i hovedsagen har fået fuldstændig medhold i sin påstand, og at den verserende sag for den forelæggende ret herefter er uden genstand.
Since the Directive has not been transposed within the period laid down, the Commission's application must be held to be well founded.
•Det er ufornødent at svare på det stillede spørgsmål.·
Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. '
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 15. maj 1997.
Advocate General G. Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 15 January 1998.
Hans forslag til afgørelse lød:
He proposed that the Court:
»Artikel 39, stk. 1, i samarbejdsaftalen mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og den demokratiske Folkerepublik Algeriet, undertegnet i Alger den 26. april 1976 og godkendt af Fællesskabet ved Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2210/78 af 26. september 1978, er til hinder for, at en medlemsstat afslår at tildele en ydelse såsom handicapydelsen til voksne — som udbetales til statens egne borgere - til hustruen til en algerier, som er eller har været beskæftiget i den pågældende medlemsstat, og som hun bor fast med i medlemsstaten, med den begrundelse, at hun er algerisk statsborger.«
(1) Declare that, by not adopting within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Council Directive 92/74/EEC of 22 September 1992 widening the scope of Directive 81/851/EEC on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to veterinary medicinal products and laying down additional provisions on homeopathic veterinary medicinal products, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
»Traktatbrud - manglende gennemførebe (Sjette Afdeling)
(2) order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.
Kongeriget Belgien har ikke bestridt det påståede traktatbrud.
Case C-214/97 Commission of the European Communities ν Portuguese Republic
Det gøres dog gældende, at et forslag til arrêté royal til gennemførelse al direktivet er blevet forelagt Conseil d'État til udtalelse.
Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations Failure to transpose, within the prescribed period, Council Directive 75/440/EEC of 16 June 1975 concerning the quality required of surface water intended for the abstraction of drinking water in the Member States (OJ 1975 L 194, p. 26)