natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det konkrete tilfælde drejede sig om en offentlig virksomheds ydelse af logistisk og forretningsmæssig bistand i dette tilfælde det franske postvæsen, til sine privatretlige filialer, som udøver virksomhed, der er underlagt den frie konkurrence.
In this important judgment the Court clarified the distinct but complementary roles of the national courts and the Commission in enforcing the Treaty rules on State aid.
Dom stolen konstaterer, at en sådan ydelse kan betragtes som statsstøtte i henhold til artikel 92 i traktaten, hvis modydelsen for denne bistand er lavere end den, der ville have været krævet på normale markedsvilkår.
The Court found that the provision of logistical and commercial assistance by a public undertaking (in this case, the French Post Office) to its private-sector sub­sidiaries engaged in activities open to free com­petition could be regarded as aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the Treaty if the remuneration received in return was less than that which would have been demanded under normal market conditions.
En sådan vurdering skal foretages af den nationale dommer.
It was for the national courts to determine the customary level of such remuneration.
De to retsinstanser er af den opfattelse, at Kommissionen er fremkommet med tungtvejende argumenter for at påvise, at den har handlet for at beskytte folkesundheden og ikke udelukkende af økonomi ske grunde, som Det Forenede Kongerige påstår.
The Court also ruled that a national court was not required to declare that it lacked jurisdiction or to stay proceedings in cases where a matter had also been referred to the Commission but the latter had not yet decided whether the government measures in question constituted State aid.
De konstaterer, at der er videnskabeligt begrundet tvivl om, hvorvidt kogalskab og Creutzfeld-Jacob-sygdommen overføres, således at det ikke kan udelukkes, at dyrs og menneskers helbred er udsat for alvorlig fare.
This ruling was based on the principle that the prohibition on implementing draft aid measures before they were approved by the Commission had direct effect.
De mener ligeledes, at de foranstaltninger, der er truffet af Kommissionen, ikke umiddelbart er diskriminerende i betragtning af, at 97,9 % tilfælde af kogalskab i Europa er blevet registreret i Det Forenede Kongerige.
On 12 July and 13 July respectively, the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance made orders dismissing the applications of the United Kingdom Government and the National Farm­ers' Union for the immediate suspension of Commission Decision 96/239/EC of 27 March, which prohibits the exportation of beef and derived products from the territory of the United Kingdom.
De fremhæver særlig, at mangelen på mærkning af dyrene og på kontrol med deres bevægelser i Det Forenede Kongerige ikke gør det muligt at iværksætte et mere selektivt, men effektivt system til at inddæmme sygdommens udbredelse end det totale eksport forbud, som er fastsat i beslutningen af 27. marts 1996.
Both Courts held that the Commis­sion had put forward serious arguments to show that it had acted to protect public health and not simply for economic reasons as the United Kingdom claimed.
I forbindelse med denne sag rejser Domstolen spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt en national retsinstans skal erklære sig inkompetent eller udsætte sin afgørelse, når Kommissionen parallelt er i gang med en undersøgelse og endnu ikke har truffet afgørelse om, hvorvidt statsforanstaltningeme er at betragte som statsstøtte.
They found that a serious danger to animal and human health could not be ruled out, given the uncertainty of the scientific community regarding the transmissibility of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or mad cow disease) and Creutzfeld-Jacob disease.
Den bekræfter, at den nationale dommer i et sådant tilfælde hverken skal erklære sig inkompetent eller udsætte sin afgørelse, til Kommissionen har taget stilling til klassificeringen af de pågældende foranstaltninger i henhold til den umiddelbare virkning af forbuddet mod iværksættelse af støtteprojekter, før Kommissionen har truffet beslutning om, hvorvidt de er lovlige.
They also took the view that the measures taken by the Commission were not prima facie dis­criminatory since 97.9% of European cases of BSE had been found in the United Kingdom.
De to retsinstanser konstaterer endvidere, at interessen for at opretholde Kommissionens beslutning er så stor, at den vanskeligt lader sig sammenligne med den interesse, klagerne har i at få den ophævet. vet.
They noted in particular that since cattle were not marked and their movements were not mon­itored within the United Kingdom, the total export ban adopted on 27 March could not be replaced by a more selective system for effec­tively halting the progression of the disease.
Domstolen gør særlig opmærksom på, at i tilfælde hvor en statsstøtteforanstaltning ikke er blevet meddelt til Kommissionen, kan den nationale dom mer skulle fortolke statsstøttebegrebet i henhold til artikel 92 i traktaten for at fastslå, om den pågældende foranstaltning skal meddeles eller ej.
The Court pointed out that in cases where a gov­ernment measure had not been notified to the Commission, the national courts might have cause to interpret the concept of aid as referred to in Article 92 of the EC Treaty if they were to determine whether the measure in question should have been notified. Should there be any doubt, the national court could ask the Commis­sion for clarification.
Er der tvivl om klassificeringen, kan den nationale retsinstans anmode Kommissionen om yderligere oplys ninger, og den skal eller kan under alle omstændigheder i henhold til artikel 177 i traktaten stille et
Furthermore, Article 177 of the Treaty enabled, and in certain circum­stances required, the national courts to request the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 92 of the Treaty.
Det bør dog understreges, at disse to kendelser kun vedrører den midlertidige og øjeblikkelige ophævelse af forbuddet mod eksport af de pågældende produkter.
A national court requested to order the repay­ment of aid had to grant that application if it
Selve sagen, som er indgivet af den britiske regering om lovligheden af beslutningen af 27. marts 1996, vil blive behandlet normalt.
Lastly, both Courts found that on balance the Commission Decision should be upheld inas­much as the interest in having it maintained was not readily comparable to the applicants' interest in having it suspended.
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans præjudicielt spørgsmål til Domstolen om fortolkningen af artikel 92 i traktaten.
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance found that the aid had not been notified to the Commission, unless repayment was inappropri­ate by reason of exceptional circumstances.
Eurovision er et system til udveksling af programmer mellem med lemmerne.
had not carried out a full, detailed and impartial examination of all the facts pertinent to the case.
Den har navnlig ikke undersøgt, om optagelsesreglerne var objektive og tilstrækkeligt præcise til at kunne anvendes ensartet og uden forskelsbehandling for alle potentielle medlemmer, og følgelig var den ikke i besiddelse af tilstrækkeligt materiale til at kunne konkludere, at de konkurrencebegrænsninger, der følger af ved tægtsbestemmelserne for EBU, var nødvendige i henhold til artikel 85, stk. 3, litra a), i traktaten.
In particular, the Commission had not examined whether the membership rules were sufficiently objective and precise to be applied in a uniform and non­discriminatory manner to all potential members and did not therefore have sufficient evidence to conclude that the restrictions placed on competition by the EBU's statutes were in­dispensable within the meaning of Article 85(3) (a).
Domstolen har benyttet lejligheden til at definere Kommissionens beføjelser.
The Court took the opportunity to redefine the Commission's powers in this area.
Denne kan ikke kræve tilbagebetaling af statsstøtte, udelukkende fordi den ikke er blevet meddelt i henhold til artikel 93 i traktaten.
The Com­mission could not order the repayment of aid on the sole grounds that it had not been notified in accordance with Article 93.
Kommissionen kan kun, før den træffer afgørelse om hvorvidt støtten er i overensstemmelse med det fælles marked, pålægge den pågældende medlemsstat umiddelbart at standse udbetalingen af støtte og give Kommissionen alle nødvendige oplysninger, for at den kan undersøge, hvorvidt støtten er i overensstemmelse med traktatens bestemmelser.
Before adopting a decision finding aid compatible or incompatible with the common market, the Commission could only enjoin the Member State concerned to sus­pend forthwith the payment of aid and to pro­vide the Commission with all the information needed for an assessment of the aid's compat­ibility.
Det er kun, hvis medlemsstaten til trods for Kommissionens pålæg undlader at give de ønskede oplysninger, at den har beføjelser til at standse proceduren, træffe afgørelse om, hvorvidt støtten er i overensstemmelse med det fælles marked på grundlag af de elementer, den allerede har og eventuelt kræve tilbagebetaling af den allerede udbetalte støtte.
It was only if a Member State failed, de­spite the Commission's injunction, to provide the information requested that the latter had the power to terminate the procedure, take a deci­sion finding the aid compatible or incompatible with the common market on the basis of the facts at its disposal and, where appropriate, order the aid to be recovered.
Domstolen fastslår ligeledes, at Kommissionen har enekompetence til at erklære, om støtten er i overensstemmelse med det fælles marked.
The Court also reasserted the Commission's exclusive powers to declare aid compatible with the common market and repeatedly stressed the importance, for the proper operation of that mar­ket, of the procedure for the prior examination of planned State aid measures.
I sin dom understreger Domstolen gentagne gange »den betydning, kontrolproceduren forud for stats støtteprojekterne har for det fælles markeds funktion«. tion«.
In the Court's opinion the Commission should have substantiated the assertions con­tained in its decision by a specific economic analysis so that the reasons given could be ver­ified by the Community courts.
Forenede sager T-528/93, T-542/93, T543/93 og T-546/93 Métropole télévision SA, Reti Televisive Italiane SpA mod Kommissionen, dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans den 11. juli 1996 (første udvidede afdeling).
Joined Cases T­528/93, T­542/93, T­543/93 and T­546/93 Métropole Télévision and Others ν Commission, Court of First Instance judgment of 11 July 1996 (First Cham­ber, extended composition).
Retten mener, at Kommissionen ud fra en global vurdering og som grundlag for at bevilge en fritagelse i henhold til artikel 85, stk. 3 i traktaten kan mene, at der er tale om forfølgelse af offentlige interesser.
Competition; decision on exemption; conditions for granting exemption; examination by the Commission; pursuit of the public interest.
Ifølge Retten skulle Kommissionen have støttet sine oplysninger i beslutningen med en konkret økonomisk analyse for at gøre det muligt for Fællesskabets dommere at kontrollere den pågældende begrundelse.
Embargo against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro); impound­ment of an aircraft.
Konkurrence — Beslutning om fritagelse — Tilde -lingsbetingelser — Kommissionens behandling, opgaver af offentlig interesse.
4­1993, point 1.3.27), as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1380/95: OJ L 138, 21.6.1995; Bull. 6­1995, point 1.4.81
Med denne dom omstøder Retten i Første Instans for første gang en beslutning fra Kommissionen, hvori der gives individuel fritagelse under anven-
For the first time the Court of First Instance annulled in its entirety a Commission decision granting an individual exemption, under Article 85(3) of the EC Treaty, to a restrictive agree­ment between undertakings.
Republikken Bosnien-Herzegovina, kan beslaglæggelsen af det pågældende fly ikke anses for at være urimelig.
Member States were to impound any vessels, freight vehicles and aircraft in which a majority or controlling share was held by an individual or company established in or operating from the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
Sag C-84/95, Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret AS mod Minister for Transport, Energi og Meddelelser mfl., dom afsagt af Domstolen den 30. juli 1996 (den samlede domstol).
France contended, in the first place, that the assistance from the FNE was a general measure which did not favour cer­tain undertakings or the production of certain goods within the meaning of Article 92( 1 ).
Statsstøtte — Statsstøttebegrebet — Statslige interventioner af social karakter — Generel foranstaltning. ning.
The Court held that the Regulation was indeed applicable in such cases and that it had to be rigorously applied to ensure that the sanctions (the impoundment of Yugos­lav means of transport) were effective.
Reference: Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 990/93 — EFT L 102 af 28.4.1993 og Bull.
It pointed out, first of all, that the FNE enjoyed a degree of latitude which enabled it to adjust its financial assistance in the light of various con­siderations such as the choice of beneficiaries, the amount of assistance granted and the terms on which it was provided.
4-1993, punkt 1.3.27, senest ændret ved Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1380/95 — EFT L 138 af 21.6.1995 og Bull. 6-1995, punkt 1.4.81
Given these discre­tionary powers, the assistance had to be consid­ered a specific rather than a general measure.
Med denne dom sætter Domstolen en klarere grænse mellem generelle foranstaltninger af social karakter, som ikke hører ind under artikel 92, stk. 1, i traktaten og de former for statsstøtte, som visse virksomheder eller visse produktioner får i henhold til denne bestemmelse, og som følgelig skal med deles til Kommissionen.
In this connection the Court recalled an earlier rul­ing to the effect that Article 92( 1 ) of the Treaty did not distinguish between State aids by refer­ence to their causes or aims but defined them in terms of their effects.
I henhold til denne forordning kan medlemsstaternes myndigheder beslaglægge alle skibe, køretøjer og luftfartøjer, i hvilke majoritetsandele eller kontrollerede andele indehaves af en person eller en virksomhed, der er etableret i Den Føderative Republik Jugoslavien eller opererer fra denne republik.
It therefore held that the impoundment of the aircraft in question could not be regarded as inappropriate or dispropor­tionate, given that it was a basic objective in the general interest of the international community to end the state of war in the region and the large-scale violations of human rights in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
I øvrigt forbedrer interventionerne fra FNE, ifølge Frankrig, ikke virsomhedernes konkurrencemuligheder. der.
State aid; concept of 'aid'; government assist­ance of a social nature; general measure.
I den pågældende sag drejede det sig om at vide, om de irske myndigheder med rette i henhold til denne bestemmelse havde beslaglagt et skib, der tilhørte en virksomhed, der var etableret i Den Føderative Republik Jugoslavien, men som var udlejet uden mandskab til en tyrkisk virksomhed.
Secondly, the Court observed that the concept of aid encompassed advantages granted by public authorities which, in various forms, alleviated the charges normally included in the budget of an undertaking.
Domstolen mener, at forordningen omfatter et sådant tilfælde. En for laksistisk anvendelse af bestemmelserne ville kunne gøre sanktionerne mindre effektive (beslaglæggelse af alle transport midler i Jugoslavien).
Given the information at its dis­posal at the time when it adopted the decision in question, the Commission had been entitled to conclude that Kimberly Clark had received aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the Treaty, since the State had contributed FRF 27.25 mil­lion towards the implementation of the com­pany's social plan, thus relieving Kimberly Clark of this financial burden and placing it at an advantage over its competitors.
Den understreger, at en så bred fortolkning af denne bestemmelse ikke medfører brud på grund læggende rettigheder og på proportionalitetsprincippet.
The Court clarified the distinction between gen­eral measures of a social nature, which are not covered by Article 92(1) of the Treaty, and aid measures which favour certain undertakings or the production of certain goods and must, conse­quently, be notified to the Commission.
Domstolen fremhæver, at et af målene i forordning (EØF) nr. 990/93 med indførelsen af sanktioner er at afskrække Jugoslavien fra fortsat at krænke Republikken Bosnien-Herzegovinas integritet og sikkerhed.
Discrimination on grounds of nationality; equal treatment; exercise of a fundamental freedom; security to cover the cost of proceedings.
Den gør opmærksom på, at FNE har skønsbeføjelser, som gør det muligt at graduere den finansielle intervention efter forskellige overvejelser, bl.a. i forbindelse med valg af støttemodtagere, beløbets størrelse og interventionsbetingelser.
The Court found that Article 6 of the EC Treaty, which prohibits any discrimination on grounds of nationality, precludes a Member State from requiring that a security be lodged for the costs of proceedings by a legal person established in another Member State which has brought an
Dette skøn udelukker, at der kan være tale om en generel foranstaltning og betyder, at interventionen bliver en specifik foranstaltning. Domstolen henviser til sin retspraksis, i henhold til hvilken artikel 92, stk. 1, i traktaten ikke skelner mellem årsager til eller mål for statsinterventionerne, men definerer disse efter, hvilken virknins de har.
France had brought an action for the annulment of a Commission decision classifying as State aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the Treaty the government assistance granted through the FNE (National Employment Fund) towards the restructuring plan implemented by Kimberly Clark Sopalin, despite the fact that the Commission had found such aid compatible
Retspraksis ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans
Decisions by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance that up-link.
Endelig minder Domstolen om, at statsstøttebegrebet dækker fordele, der bevilges af de offentlige myndigheder, som under forskellige former letter de byrder, der normalt tynger en virksomheds budget.
The Commission, on the other hand, contended that the Directive had to be interpreted as meaning that jurisdiction lay with the Member State on whose territory the broad­caster was established.
til adgang til denne stats retsinstanser. Domstolen fastslår, at muligheden for at anlægge sag i en medlemsstat for at få afgjort tvister, som de økonomiske aktiviteter kan give anledning til, følger med den fri bevægelighed for varer og tjenesteydelser.
action before one of its courts against one of its nationals or a company established in the Mem­ber State in question, where no such security is required from legal persons of that State and where the action is connected with the exercise of fundamental freedoms guaranteed by Com­munity law.
Forskelsbehandling på grund af nationalitet — Ligebehandling — Udøvelse af grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder — Sikkerhedsstillelse for sagsomkostninger (cautio judicatum solvi).
The Court upheld the Commission's argument, taking the view that under the Directive a Mem­ber State's jurisdiction over a broadcaster could be based only on the broadcaster's connection to that State's legal system, a connection which in substance overlapped with the concept of estab­lishment as used in Article 59 of the Treaty.
Tv uden grænser — En medlemsstats manglende overholdelse af fællesskabsbestemmelserne — Satellittransmission — Myndighed over tv-institu-tioner.
A Member State could exercise jurisdiction over broadcasts via a satellite up-link only if no other Member State had such jurisdiction under the Directive.
Reference: Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF — EFT L 298 af 17.10.1989 og Bull. 10-1989, punkt 2.1.18
The Court's interpretation could not be called into question by reference to the Coun­cil of Europe Convention on Transfrontier Tele­vision, since Member States had undertaken to apply the provisions of that Convention only in areas not covered by any Community rules.
Med denne dom konstaterer Domstolen, at Det Forenede Kongeriges lovgivning ikke var i overensstemmelse med direktiv 89/552/EØF »TV uden grænser«. Sagen drejede sig om det kriterium, der anvendes i den nationale lovgivning for fastlæggelse af beføjelserne for den nationale myndighed, der har kontrol med radio og tv-spredning via satellit.
The Court found that a national procedural rule of this kind was liable to affect the economic ac­tivity of traders from other Member States on the market of the State in question, for it placed such traders in a less advantageous position than nationals as regards access to the courts of that State.
Den britiske lovgivning indeholdt en bestemmelse om, at den stat, hvori »uplink« befinder sig, havde beføjelser til at kontrollere udsendelserne fra denne forbindelse.
The Court held, as a corollary of the free movement of goods and services, that traders must be able to bring actions before the courts of a Member State in order to resolve any disputes arising from their economic activities.
I det pågældende tilfælde tvinger den svenske lovgivning alle udenlandske statsborgere, der ikke har bopæl i Sverige eller en udenlandsk juridisk person, som ønsker at lægge sag an ved en svensk retsinstans mod en svensk statsborger eller en svensk juridisk person, til at stille sikkerhed som garanti for betaling af omkostningerne i forbindelse med en eventuel retsprocedure.
National legislation which required the lodging of a secu­rity fell within the scope of the Treaty by reason of its effects on intra-Community trade in goods and services, and was consequently subject to the general principle of non-discrimination laid down by the first paragraph of Article 6, without there being any need to invoke other, more spe­cific provisions of the Treaty.
Domstolen konstaterer, at en sådan national procedureregel kan påvirke den økonomiske aktivitet hos erhvervsdrivende fra andre medlemslande på markedet i den pågældende stat, idet den placerer disse erhvervsdrivende i en mindre fordelagtig situation end statens egne statsborgere med hensyn
The Court concluded that the Directive required Member States to make no distinction, as regards the broadcasters under its jurisdiction, between those whose broadcasts were solely or chiefly intended for the public of another Mem­ber State and those whose broadcasts were essentially intended for the public in the Mem­ber State itself.
Forenede sager C-239/96 R og C-240/96 R, Det Forenede Kongerige/Kommissionen, ken delse afsagt af Domstolens præsident den 24. september 1996.
Case C-11/95 Commission Court judgment of 10 September Court).
Budget; socialpolitik, foranstaltninger til fordel for ældre, foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af fattigdom og social udstødelse, suspension af betalinger.
Television without frontiers; failure of a Mem­ber State to fulfil its obligations; transmission by satellite; jurisdiction over broadcasters.
Tv uden grænser — Transmission via kabel — Forhåndstilladelse.
Television without frontiers; failure of a Mem­ber State to fulfil its obligations; transmission by cable; prior authorization.
Reference: Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF — EFT L 298 af 17.10.1989 og Bull. 10-1989, punkt 2.1.18
Reference: Council Directive 89/552/EEC: OJ L298, 17.10.1989; Bull.
Det Forenede Kongerige har ligeledes anmodet Dom stolen om at suspendere virkningen af disse to cirkulærer, indtil Domstolen har afsagt dom om deres lovlighed.
Reference: Council Directive 89/552/EEC: OJ L298, 17.10.1989; Bull. 10-1989, point 2.1.18
Med denne dom konstaterer Domstolen, at Belgien bryder direktiv 89/552/EØF »tv uden grænser« ved i de fransksprogede og flamsksprogede områder at opretholde en lovgivning, hvorefter der stilles krav om forudgående tilladelse til videretransmission via kabel af radio og tv-udsendelser fra andre medlemsstater.
The Court found that the United Kingdom legis­lation did not comply with Directive 89/552/ EEC on 'television without frontiers'.