natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den i forordning (EØF) nr. 2541/84 omhandlede udligningsafgift skal opkræves af etanol, der forarbejdes i frizone og indgår som en del af et færdigt produkt, der videreforsendes til en anden medlemsstat, når etanolen ikke har været undergivet særlige toldordninger, men alene toldvæsenets almindelige kontrol".
The countervailing charge provided for in Regulation (EEC) No. 2541/84 must be levied on ethyl alcohol which is processed within a free zone and becomes part of a finished product which is to be sent to another Member State, and which has not been placed under any special customs procedure other than customs supervision."
Generaladvokat Jean Mischo fremsatte fprslag til afgørelse i retsmødet i Første Afdeling den 7. marts 1991.
Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 7 March 1991.
Forslaget Lød:
He concluded as follows:
Gennemgangen af det første spørgsmål har intet frembragt, der kan anfægte gyldigheden af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2541/84 af 4. september 1984 om fastsættelse af en udligningsafgift ved indførsel af etanol, der er fremstillet i Frankrig af landbrugsprodukter, til de øvrige medlemsstater, som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 644/85 af 12. marts 1985.
Consideration of the first question has failed to disclose any factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 2541/84 of 4 September 1984 fixing a countervailing charge on imports into other Member States of ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin produced in France, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 644/85 of 12 March 1985.
Ved kendelse af 19. december 1988 havde Corte Suprema di Cassazione forelagt et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 35 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 222/77 om fællesskabsforsendelse.
By an order of 19 December 1988, the Corte Suprema di Cassazione [Supreme Court of Cassation] referred a question on the interpretation of Article 35 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 222/77 on Community transit for a preliminary ruling.
Spørgsmålet var blevet rejst under en sag mellem de ovenfor nævnte parter angående de forpligtelser, der fulgte af en sikkerhed, som Berner havde stillet i medfør af artikel 27 i ovennævnte forordning nr. 222/77.
That question had arisen in proceedings between the abovementioned parties concerning the obligations resulting from a guarantee furnished by Berner pursuant to Article 27 of Regulation No. 222/77.
I oktober 1978 udstedte det schweiziske toldsted i Locarno­Cadenazzo (afgangstoldstedet) to Τ 1­angivelser for varer, der skulle overgå til fri omsætning i Belgien.
In October 1978, the Swiss customs office at Lucarno-Cadenazzo (the office of departure) had issued two Tl certificates in respect of goods intended for consumption in Belgium.
De pågældende varer blev imidlertid i strid med reglerne bragt i fri omsætning i Italien.
The goods in question, however, were unlawfully placed on the market in Italy.
I januar 1982 pålagde toldstedet i Como Berner, som havde påtaget sig kautionen i forbindelse med forsendelsen i henhold til nævnte forord­ning, at betale 6.250.000 lire som følge af, at Τ 1­angivelserne ikke var blevet færdigbehandlet.
In January 1982 the customs office at Como ordered Berner, which had lodged a guarantee in respect of the transaction in accordance with the abovementioned provisions, to pay the sum of Lit 6 250 000 by reason of the fact that the Tl certificates mentioned above had not been discharged.
Berner gjorde indsigelse mod dette pålæg, idet selskabet gjorde gældende, at det ikke af afgangstoldstedet var blevet underrettet om, at angivelserne ikke var blevet færdigbehandlet, hvilket var i strid med artikel 35 i forordning nr. 222/77, således som bestemmelsen dengang var affattet.
Berner challenged that order, claiming that it had not been notified of the nondischarge by the office of departure, contrary to the requirements of Article 35 of Regulation No. 222/77, in the version in force at the material time.
"Artikel 35 i Rådets forordning nr. 222/77 af 13. december 1976 om fælles­skabsforsendelse skal i den affattelse, der var gældende, før bestemmelsen blev ændret ved Rådets forordning nr. 3813/81 af 15. december 1981, fortolkes således, at alene afgangstoldstedet er kompetent til at underrette kautionis­ten om, at T1­angivelsen ikke er blevet færdigbehandlet."
"Article 35 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 222/77 of 13 December 1976 on Community transit, in the version in force before its amendment by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3813/81 of 15 December 1981, is to be interpreted as meaning that the power to notify the guarantor of the nondischarge of the Tl document was vested exclusively in the office of departure."
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse for Fjerde Afdeling den 7. februar 199ÍT
Mr Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fourth Chamber on 7 February 1991.
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse:
He concluded as follows::
"Artikel 35 i forordning (EØF) nr. 222/77 af 13. december 1976 skal i den version, der var gældende, før bestemmelsen blev ændret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 3813/81 af 15. december 1981, fortolkes således, at sikkerheden kun kan
"Article 35 of Regulation No. 222/77 of 13 December 1976, in the version in force prior to its amendment by Regulation No. 3813/81 of 15 December 1981, must be interpreted as meaning that the release of the guarantee may be refused only where the guarantor has been notified of the nondischarge of the Tl document by the customs office where the Community transit operation began. Release of the guarantee may not be refused where the guarantor was
­ 18 ­ nægtes frigivet, når det toldsted, hvor fællesskabsforsendelsen begyndte, har underrettet kautionisten om, at Τ 1­angivelsen ikke er blevet færdigbehand­let.
18 - notified of the nondischarge of the Tl document by another customs authority of the State of departure, even if under the law of that State that authority has higher status than the aforementioned customs office.'
Sag C­263/85 : Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Italienske Republik
Case C-263/85: Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic - 16 May 1991 (Free movement of goods - Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Measure having equivalent effect - Aid for the purchase of vehicles of domestic manufacture) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgivet den 27. august 1985, havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter Traktatens artikel 30, idet den kræver, at offentlige organer skal købe indenlandsk fremstillede køretøjer for at opnå støtte i henhold til lov nr. 151 af 10. april 1981.
By application of 27 August 1985, the Commission brought an action seeking a declaration that by requiring public bodies to purchase motor vehicles of domestic manufacture in order to qualify for grants under Law No. 151 of 10 April 1981, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat Carl Otto Lenz havde fremsat forslag til afgørelse den 26. februar 1991.
Mr Advocate General CO. Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 26 February 1991.
Han sammenfattede sit forslag således:
He concluded as follows:
"Den eneste mulige konklusion er at tilslutte sig Kommissionens synspunkt (hvilket sagsøgte da også anerkendte under den mundtlige forhandling).
"The only possible conclusion (the soundness of which even the defendant admitted during the oral procedure) is that the view taken by the Commission must be accepted.
Det må herefter fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtel­ser efter EØF­Traktatens artikel 30, idet den kræver, at offentlige organer skal købe indenlandsk fremstillede køretøjer for at opnå støtte i henhold til lov nr. 151 af 10. april 1981.
In accordance with the request as formulated, the Court should accordingly rule that by requiring public bodies to purchase motor vehicles of domestic manufacture in order to qualify for grants under Law No. 151 of 10 April 1981, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the EEC Treaty.
Sagsøgte bør følgelig også betale sagens omkostninaer."
In view of this outcome to the proceedings, the Court should also order the defendant to pay the costs."
Ved stævning, indgivet til Domstolen den 21. marts 1989, havde Kommissionen nedlagt påstand om, at det statueres, at Kongeriget Nederlandene havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EØF-Traktaten, idet det i 1983 havde frigivet ca. 60.000 tons maniok, udført fra Thailand uden eksportcertifikat, til fri omsætning inden for Fælles skabet mod erlæggelse af en nedsat afgift på 6% af værdien.
By application lodged on 21 March 1989, the Commission brought an action seeking a declaration that by admitting to free circulation in 1983, at a reduced rate of levy of 6% ad valorem, some 60 000 tonnes of manioc exported from Thailand without an export certificate, the Kingdom of the Netherlands had failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The Court ruled as follows: to fulfil its obligations under
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 6. november
(a) by admitting to free circulation in or around April 1983 approximately 60 OOO tonnes of manioc which had been exported from Thailand without an export certificate
"Kongeriget Nederlandene har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EØF-Traktaten, idet det
- without applying the full rate of agricultural levy as provided for in Articles 2 and 4 of Regulation (EEC) No. 2744/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the import and export system for products processed from cereals and from rice,
- i april 1983 har frigivet ca. 60.000 tons maniok, som var blevet udført fra Thailand uden eksportcertifikat, til fri omsætning inden for Fællesskabet mod erlæggelse af en nedsat afgift på 6% af værdien, og
- and without checking, in accordance with Article 7 of Commission Regulations (EEC) No. 2029/82 of 22 July 1982 and No. 3383/82 of 16 December 1982 laying down detailed rules for implementing the import arrangements applicable to products falling within subheading 07.06 A of the Common Customs Tariff, originating in Thailand and exported from that country in 1982 and 1983 respectively, whether there was a right in respect of the manioc to application of the lower levy provided for in the Co-operation Agreement between the EEC and Thailand; and
- har afvist, at det beløb, som man med urette undlod at opkræve for denne mængde maniok, nemlig 19.765.281,39 hfl., må betragtes som Fællesskabets egne indtægter og stilles til rådighed for Kommissionen med tillæg af rente fra 29. juni 1984, jfr. artikel 11 i Rådets forordning nr. 2891/77.
(b) by refusing to establish that the amount which was wrongly not levied on the manioc, namely Hfl 19 765 281.39, is the Community's own resources and to make that sum, together with interest as from 29 June 1984, avail able to the Commission in accordance with Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No. 2891/77 of 19 December 1977 implementing the Decision of 21 April 1970 on the replacement of financial contributions from Member States by the Communi ty's own resources;
Den sagsøgte medlemsstat betaler sagens omkostninger.'
Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 6 November 1990.
Sag C-358/89: Extramet Industrie SA mod Rådet for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
"The Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty.
"Handelspolitik - dumping - importører - annullationssøgsmål - formalitet"
Case C-358/89: Extramet Industrie SA ν Council of the European Communities - 16 May 1991 (Commercial policy - Dumping - Importers - Action for annulment -Admissibility) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indleveret den 27. november 1989, havde den franske virksomhed Extramet anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2808/89 om indførelse af en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af calciummetal med oprindeLse i Den Kinesiske Folkerepublik og Sovjetunionen og om endelig opkrævning af den midlertidige antidumpingtold på denne import.
By an application lodged on 27 November 1989, Extramet, a company governed by French law, sought the annulment of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2808/89 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of calcium metal originating in the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union and definitively collecting the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed on such imports.
Ved særskilt dokument, indleveret den 15. februar 1990, havde Rådet fremsat en formalitetsindsigelse mod Extramet's søgsmål begrundet med, at sagsøgeren var en uafhængig importør, hvis salgspriser ikke var blevet taget i betragtning ved fastsættelsen af eksportprisen, hvorfor virksomheden ikke var individuelt berørt af den anfægtede forordning.
By a separate document lodged on 15 February 1990, the Council raised an objection of inadmissibility against the application by Extramet, on the ground that it was an independent importer whose selling prices had not been taken into consideration for the purpose of establishing an export price and that consequently it was not individually affected by the disputed regulation.
Formalitetsindsigelsen tages ikke til følge.
The Court ruled as follows:
Sagen fremmes til realitetsbehandling.
The objection of inadmissibility is dismissed;
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 21. marts 1991.
Mr Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 21 March 1991.
Hans konklusion Lød således:
He proposed that the Court should:
Sagen fremmes til realitetsbehandling;
Declare the application admissible;
2. afgørelsen om sagens omkostninger udsættes."
Reserve the costs."
Sag C-167/90: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Kongeriget Belgien (Domstolens plenum)
Case C-167/90:
16.5.1991 "Fri bevægelighed for personer - manglende gennemførelse af et direktiv -gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser og samordning inden for det farmaceutiske område"
Commission of the European Communities ν Kingdom of Belgium - 16 May 1991 (Free movement of persons - Failure to implement a directive - Mutual recognition of diplomas and co-ordination in the field of pharmacy)
Ved stævning, indgivet den 30. maj 1990, havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Kongeriget Belgien havde tilsidesat de forpligtelser, der påhviler det i henhold til EØF-Trakta-ten, idet det i strid med artikel 1 i Rådets direktiv 85/432/EØF af 16.
By an application lodged on 30 May 1990, the Commission brought an action seeking a declaration that by reserving the exercise of the activities of qualified pharmacists and of pharmacists attached to hospital pharmacies or medical depositories to persons holding a diploma in hospital pharmacy, contrary to Article 1 of Council Directive 85/432/EEC, and by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the measures necessary to comply with Council Directives 85/433/EEC and 85/584/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium had failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
"Der gives sagsøgeren medhold, og sagsøgte tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger."
(b) by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to implement Council Directive 85/433/EEC of 16 September 1985 and Council Directive 85/584/EEC of 20 December
Sag C-168/90: Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg 16.5.1991
He proposed that the Court should:
(Domstolens plenum) "Fri bevægelighed for personer - manglende gennemførelse af et direktiv -gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser og samordning inden for det farmaceutiske område".
Case C-168/90: Commission of the European Communities ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg - 16 May 1991 (Free movement of persons - Failure to implement a directive - Mutual recognition of diplomas and co-ordination in the field of pharmacy) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgivet den 30. maj 1990, havde Kommissionen anlagt sag med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg havde tilsidesat de forpligtelser, som påhviler det i henhold til EØF-Traktaten, idet det ikke inden for de fastsatte frister havde truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger for at efterkomme Rådets direktiver 85/433/EØF og 85/584/EØF.
By an application lodged on 30 May 1990, the Commission brought an action seeking a declaration that by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the measures necessary to comply with Council Directives 85/433/EEC and 85/584/EEC, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg had failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
"Der gives sagsøgeren medhold, og sagsøgte tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger"
By failing to adopt within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to implement Council Directive 85/433/EEC of 16 September 1985 and Council Directive 85/584/EEC of 20 December 1985 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in pharmacy, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment relating to certain activities in the field of pharmacy, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
(Domstolens plenum) "Arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed - social sikring - ydelser ved arbejdsløshed" (Præjudi ciel)
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 23 April 1991.
Domstolen besvarede det forelagte spørgsmål således:
He proposed that the Court should:
"Gældende fællesskabsret, navnlig artiklerne 67, stk. 3, 69 og 70 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere, selvstændige erhvervsdrivende og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, er ikke til hinder for, at en medlemsstat afslår at tildele en arbejdstager ydelser ved arbejdsløshed efter udløbet af den i forordningens artikel 69 foreskrevne tremåneders periode, når arbejdstageren ikke har tilbagelagt sine seneste forsikrings- eller beskæftigelsesperioder i den pågældende medlemsstat."
By a judgment of 4 September 1990, which was received at the Court on 10 September 1990, the Tribunale de Grande Instance [Regional Court], Valence, referred a question to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Articles 7 and 58 to 66 of the EEC Treaty and Article 67 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71.
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 18. april
That question had arisen in proceedings between Mr Van Noorden, a Netherlands national domiciled in France, and ASSEDIC concerning the refusal by the latter to continue to pay to Mr Van Noorden for more than three months unemployment benefits which he had been receiving in Germany, on the ground that he had not completed lastly a period of employment in France.
"Gældende fællesskabsret, navnlig artikel 67 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 er ikke til hinder for, at en medlemsstat afslår at tildele en arbejdstager ydelser ved arbejdsløshed efter udløbet af den i forordningens artikel 69 foreskrevne tremåneders periode, såfremt arbejdstageren aldrig har været undergivet den pågældende medlemsstats sociale lovgivning."
"The relevant Community legislation, in particular Article 67 of Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71, does not preclude a Member State from refusing to grant a worker unemployment benefit for more than the maximum period of three months laid down in Article 69 of that regulation in the case where that worker has never been subject to the social legislation of the Member State in question."
Sag T­18/90: Jongen mod Kommissionen (Tjenestemandssag) "Udnævnelse ­ indplacering i lønklasse og på løntrin" (Tredje Afdeling)
Case T-18/90: Jongen ν Commission - 7 May 1991 (Staff case) (Appointment - Classification in grade and step) (Third Chamber)
Sag T­30/90: Zoder mod Parlamentet (Tjenestemandssag) "Forfremmelse ­ sammenligning af fortjeneste ­ anciennitet" (Fjerde Afdeling)
Case T-30/90: Zoder ν Parliament - 14 May 1991 (Staff case) (Promotion - Comparative examination of merits - Seniority) (Fourth Chamber)
7.5.1991 Traktatbrud - EØF-Traktatens artikler 59 og 60 - adgang for en statsborger i Fællesskabet, der har virket som advokat i oprindelseslandet, til at arbejde som juridisk rådgiver i etableringslandet, hvor han arbejder på et advokatkontor - betingelser for møderet i etableringslandet.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Articles 59 and 60 of the EEC Treaty - Community national who had practised as a lawyer in his State of origin allowed to act as legal adviser in the State of establishment where he works in a law firm - Conditions of admission to the Bar in the State of establishment.
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 7. maj 1991.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 7 May 1991.
Hans forslag lød således:
He proposed that the Court should:
- ved at udelukke franske statsborgere, der udøver virksomhed som advokat i en anden medlemsstat end Den Franske Republik, fra at være omfattet af direktivets rettigheder;
(b) by requiring the lawyer who is providing services to work in conjunction with a lawyer established within France, even in cases where compulsory legal representation is not prescribed, and
- ved at pålægge en tjenesteydende advokat at handle via en advokat, der er etableret på fransk område, selv når advokatbistand ikke er obligatorisk;
(c) by making the lawyer providing the services subject to the principle of the territorial exclusivity of the right of audience,
- ved at underkaste en tjenesteydende advokat princippet om geografisk begrænsning af møderetten;
- 25 - the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 59 and 60 of the EEC Treaty;
2. sagsøgte pålægges at betale sagens omkostninger;
Order the defendant to pay the costs;
3. det statueres, at intervenienten betaler sine egne omkostnigner."
Rule that the intervener shall pay its own costs."
Sag C-35/90 Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Spanien
Case C-35/90:
7.5.1991 Traktatbrud - artikel 2, stk. 1, i Rådets sjette momsdirektiv - momsfritagelse for tjenesteydelser, herunder ydelser, hvor modydelsen består af ophavsrettigheder, leveret af billedhuggere, forfattere, litterære medarbejdere, grafikere og fotografer ved aviser og tidsskrifter, komponister, forfattere af teaterstykker og forfattere, som udarbejder og bearbejder manuskripter, handling og drejebøger til audiovisuelle værker.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations -Article 2 (1) of the Sixth Council Directive - Exemption from VAT of the professional services, including those whose consideration consists in copyright, provided by sculptors, writers, literary contributors, illustrators and photographers of newspapers and magazines, musical composers, playwrights and persons responsible for the plot, adaption, scenario or script of audio-visual works.
2. i Øvrigt frifindes sagsøgte;
For the rest, dismiss the application;
Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland pålægges at betale sagens omkostninger."
Order the Federal Republic to pay the costs."
Fortolkning af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 222/77 om fællesskabsforsendelse - spørgsmålet, om en T1-angivelse skal betragtes som en gyldig transporttiLladelse for samtlige medlemsstaters område, uanset den trasnporterede vares art - strategiske varer
Others ν Α. Richardt and Others - 8 May 1991 (Reference for a preliminary ruling) Supreme Court of Justice of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Court of Cassation) - Interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 222/77 on Community transit -Recognition of the Tl document as a valid authorization for transit within the territory of any Member State, irrespective of the nature of the goods transported -Strategic goods.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 8. maj 1991.
Mr Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 8 May 1991.