natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sag C-181/90: Consorgan - Gestão de Empresas, Lda., mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
The Department for European Social Fund Affairs (DAFSE), Lisbon, submitted in the name of the Portuguese Republic and on behalf of a group of undertakings which included Consorgan, an application for assistance from the Fund for a training project.
4.6.1992 "Socialpolitik - Den Europæiske Socialfond - annullationssøgsmål til prør velse af nedsættelse af oprindelig bevilget tilskud" (Anden Afdeling)
On completion of the training, Consorgan submitted to DAFSE a final application for payment of the balance due, which was certified as factually and mathematically correct by the Portuguese Republic.
Ved stævning indgivet den 8. juni 1990 havde selskabet Consorgan anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning om nedsættelse af det tilskud, som Den Europæiske Socialfond (EFS) oprindelig havde bevilget selskabet til en uddannelsesforanstaltning.
However, after examining the application, the Commission noted certain noneligible expenses and decided to reduce the amount of assistance originally granted by the Fund.
Departementet for Anliggender Vedrørende Den Europæiske Socialfond (DAFSE) i Lissabon havde på vegne af Den Portugisiske Republik og til fordel for en gruppe virksomheder, som omfattede Consorgan, indgivet ansøgning om tilskud fra Fonden til en uddannelsesforanstaltning.
In support of its application, Consorgan alleged an infringement of essential procedural requirements on the part of the Commission, in that the decision did not contain, as required by Article 190 of the EEC Treaty, a statement of the reasons on which it was based.
Da uddannelsesforanstaltningen var afsluttet, indgav Consorgan en ansøgning til DAFSE om udbetaling af saldobeløbet, hvis faktiske og regnskabsmæssige rigtighed attesteredes af Den Portugisiske Republik.
The Court pointed out that although, for the purposes of an initial application to the Fund for assistance, a summary statement of reasons satisfied the requirements of Article 190 because the rejection of such an application merely involved refusal of the requested financial assistance, once the initial application had been approved a decision reducing the amount of assistance initially granted entailed more serious consequences for the applicant.
Kommissionen fastslog på grundlag af en gennemgang af ansøgningen, at den bl.a. omfattede et ikke-tilskudsberettiget beløb, og besluttede at nedsætte det oprindelig bevilgede tilskud fra Fonden.
It followed that such a decision had to indicate clearly the grounds for the reduction of the assistance from the amount initially approved.
Consorgan gjorde til støtte for sin påstand gældende, at Kommissionen havde tilsidesat væsentlige formforskrifter, idet den anfægtede beslutning ikke opfylder begrundelseskravet i Traktatens artikel 190.
With regard to the grounds relied on by the Commission to justify its decision, the Court stated that the approval had been given for an aggregate amount and that the application for payment of the balance had been submitted in respect of the project as a whole; no detailed and precise approval decision had been notified to each of the undertakings concerned.
Domstolen udtalte, at selv om en kortfattet begrundelse i forbindelse med den oprindelige ansøgning om tilskud fra Fonden opfylder kravene i Traktatens artikel 190, fordi et afslag på en sådan ansøgning kun indebærer nægtelse af den ansøgte økonomiske støtte, når den oprindelige ansøgning er blevet imødekommet, indebærer en beslutning om nedsættelse af det oprindelig bevilgede beløb langt alvorligere følger for ansøgeren.
Furthermore, it appeared that the Commission had apportioned the reduction amongst the members of the group of undertakings according to the extent to which each was involved in each of the items concerned and not according to the exact amount of the irregular expenditure. However, that method of calculation had never been disclosed to the applicant.
Det følger heraf, at en sådan beslutning klart skal angive de grunde, som kan berettige en nedsættelse af tilskuddet i forhold til det oprindelig bevilgede beløb.
In the result, although the applicant had been informed as to the exact amount of the reduction, it had not been notified of the detailed procedures for reduction of the assistance from the Fund.
Kommissionens beslutning af 30. marts 1990, hvorefter udgifter til et beløb af 30.501.190 ESC vedrørende den til Den Europæiske Socialfond indgivne ansøgning om tilskud nr. 87.1106/P1 ikke fandtes tilskudsberettigede, annulleres.
The Commission decision of 30 March 1990 declaring non-el igible expenses in an amount of 30 501 190 Portuguese escudos in connection with application for assistance No 87.U06/P1, submitted to the European Social Fund, is annulled.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse for Anden Afdeling den 25. februar 1992.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 25 February 1992.
"annullation af de beslutninger om nedsættelse af tilskud fra Den Europæiske Socialfond, som Kommissionen har truffet med hensyn til ansøgning om tilskud nr. 87.1106/P1, der blev meddelt selskabet Consorgan ved skrivelse af 30. marts 1990, samt at den sagsøgte institution tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger."
The Department for European Social Fund Affairs (DAFSE), Lisbon, submitted in the name of the Portuguese Republic and on behalf of a group of undertakings which included Cipeke, an application for assistance from the Fund for a training project.
Cipeke gjorde til støtte for sin påstand gældende, at Kommissionen havde tilsidesat væsentlige formforskrifter, idet den anfægtede beslutning ikke opfylder begrundelseskravet i Traktatens artikel 190.
In support of its application, Cipeke alleged an infringement of essential procedural requirements on the part of the Commission, in that the decision did not contain, as required by Article 190 of the EEC Treaty, a statement of the reasons on which it was based.
For så vidt angår Domstolens argumentation henvises til den ovenfor refererede dom i sag C-181/90.
For the reasoning of the Court, see Case C-181/90 above.
Kommissionens beslutning af 15. marts 1990, hvorefter udgifter til et beløb af 11.104.748 ESC vedrørende den til Den Europæiske Socialfond indgivne ansøgning om tilskud nr. 87.1012/P1 ikke fandtes tilskudsberettigede, annulleres.
The Commission decision of 15 March 1990 declaring noneligible expenses in an amount of 11 104 748 Portuguese escudos in connection with application for assistance No 87.1012/P1, submitted to the European Social Fund, is annulled.
"annullation af de beslutninger om nedsættelse af tilskud fra Den Europæiske Socialfond, som Kommissionen har truffet med hensyn til ansøgning om tilskud nr. 87.1012/P1, som blev meddelt selskabet Cipeke ved skrivelse af 15. marts 1990, samt at den sagsøgte institution tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger."
The questions were raised in criminal proceedings against Michel Debus, the representative of the French company Brasserie Fischer SA, for importing and marketing in Italy beer containing sulphur dioxide in a quantity permitted by the relevant French legislation but higher than that permitted by the Italian legislation applicable to such products.
(Præjudicielle) "Frie varebevægelser - foranstaltning med tilsvarende virkning - øl -svovldioxid" (Femte Afdel ing)
The need for such a prohibition for the protection of health had not been proved.
Ved kendelser af 9. januar 1991 og 25. marts 1991, indgået til Domstolen henholdsvis den 16. januar 1991 og den 12. april 1991, havde Pretura circondariale di Pordenone og Pretura circondariale di Vigevano forelagt præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af EØF-Traktatens artikel 30 og 36.
On the contrary, the undisputed statements of the Commission showed that the absorption of sulphur dioxide through consumption of a beer which, like that produced by Fischer, contains 36.8 mg per litre, does not involve any serious risk of exceeding the maximum daily dose of sulphur dioxide accepted by the FAO and the WHO.
Spørgsmålene var rejst under straffesager mod Michel Debus, der er repræsentant efter loven for det franske selskab Brasserie Fischer SA, og som var tiltalt for at have indført til og i Italien bragt øl i omsætning, hvis indhold af svovldioxid var i overensstemmelse med de herom gældende franske bestemmelser, men oversteg den mængde, der er tilladt efter italiensk lovgivning.
The Italian Government's argument that the addition of sulphur dioxide was entirely unnecessary for the preservation of the beer, since a similar effect can be achieved by other methods, could not justify a general and absolute prohibition like the one at issue.
Domstolen fastslog i den forbindelse først, at de omtvistede italienske bestemmelser indebærer et generelt, absolut og undtagelsesfrit forbud mod øl, der indeholder mere end 20 mg svovldioxid.
As was apparent from the case-law of the Court, it was not sufficient, in order to show that certain additives could not meet a technological requirement, to refer to another method of manufacturing the product used by domestic producers, since such an interpretation of the concept of technological requirement, which leads to preference for domestic production methods, constituted a means of imposing a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Tværtimod fremgik det af Kommissionens bemærkninger, som ikke var bestridt, at indtagelse af svovldioxid, når man drikker en øl, der, som den af selskabet Fischer fremstillede øl, indeholder 36,8 mg pr. liter af det pågældende tilsætningsstof, ikke indebærer en alvorlig risiko for at overskride de grænser for maksimal daglig indtagelse af svovldioxid, som er fastsat af FAO og WHO.
The concept of technological requirement had to be appraised in relation to the raw materials used and to the assessment made by the authorities of the Member State where the product was lawfully made and marketed.
Den italienske regerings argument om, at tilsætning af svovldioxid ikke er nødvendig for at gøre øl mere holdbart, idet en sådan virkning kan opnås med andre midler, kunne ikke begrunde et generelt og absolut forbud som det i sagen omtvistede.
Account also had to be taken of the results of international scientific research and in particular of that of Community scientific committees on food for human consumption and of the Codex Alimentarius committee of the FAO and the World Health Organization.
Domstolen bemærkede afslutningsvis, at begrebet teknologisk behov må ses i relation til de anvendte råvarer og under hensyn til den vurdering, som er lagt til grund af myndighederne i den medlemsstat, hvor produktet er blevet lovligt fremstillet og bragt i omsætning.
Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which prohibits the marketing of a beer imported from another Member State whose sulphur dioxide content exceeds 20 mg per litre if such rules do not satisfy the principle of proportionality laid down in the case-law of the Court, that is to say where they go further than is necessary to ensure protection of public health.
Endvidere bør der tages hensyn til resultaterne af den internationale videnskabelige forskning, navnlig konklusionerne fra Fællesskabets Videnskabelige Udvalg for Levnedsmidler og Codex Alimentarius-Udvalget under FAO og Verdensundhedsorganisationen.
Where the Member State in question authorizes for other food products, such as wine, a sulphur dioxide content which is far higher, the proportionality of the said legislation applied to beer must be examined in the light - firstly - of the relative extent of beer consumption as against that of other products and, more particularly against that of wine, having regard to all foodstuffs consumed in the Member State concerned and of the real danger which each of those products thus represents for health in the event of excessive absorption of sulphur dioxide through the cumulative effect of the amounts contained in the total food intake and - secondly - of the differences between beer and other food products, more particularly wine, in relation to the technological or economic necessity of adding the additive in question to such products.
EØF-Traktatens artikel 30 og 36 skal fortolkes således, at de er til hinder for nationale bestemmelser, hvorefter der ikke må bringes øl i omsætning, der er indført fra en anden medlemsstat, hvor det lovligt er bragt i omsætning, såfremt det indeholder mere end 20 mg svovldioxid pr. liter.
In any event, the abovementioned legislation does not satisfy the principle of proportionality in so far as it does not allow the possibility of obtaining, by means of a measure of general scope for a particular kind of beer, an exemption from the marketing prohibition by means of proceedings which are easily accessible, which can be completed within a reasonable period and which allow the possibility of a judicial appeal against any refusal to grant the exemption.
Den nationale retsinstans skal undlade at anvende nationale bestem melser, der er i strid med fællesskabsretten."
A national court may not apply domestic legislation that is incompatible with Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty.
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 24. marts 1992.
A national court must, within the limits of its jurisdiction, take all measures conducive to ensuring, in accordance with Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty, the free movement within the Community of a beer imported from another Member State."
Under alle omstændigheder er lovgivningen ikke i overensstemmelse med proportionalitetsprincippet, når det ikke i henhold til en generel retsakt for en bestemt øl sort er muligt at opnå fritagelse fra forbuddet mod markedsføring ved en procedure, som er let til gængelig, som kan gennemføres inden for en rimelig frist, og som giver mulighed for at anlægge sag til prøvelse af et eventuelt
By order of 24 October 1990, which was received at the Court on 10 December 1990, the Landesarbeitsgericht (Higher Labour Court) Berlin referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 119 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 75/117/EEC in order to assess
- 16 - afslag på en ansøgning om fritagelse.
16 - the compatibility therewith of certain provisions of the German Law on the organization of undertakings.
En national ret må ikke anvende national lovgivning, der er i strid med Traktatens artikel 30 og 36.
The question was raised in proceedings concerning the amount of compensation claimed by Mrs Botel, a part-time nurse, from her employer, the AWSB, for her participation in training courses.
En national ret er forpligtet til inden for rammerne af sin kompetence at træffe alle foranstaltninger, der i overensstemmelse med Traktatens artikel 30 og 36 kan sikre den frie omsætning inden for Fællesskabet af øl, der er importeret fra en anden medlemsstat."
Mrs Botel was the President of a branch staff committee and as such took six training courses relating to the activities of staff committees.
(Præjudiciel) "Fri bevægelighed for personer - lige løn - godtgørelse for deltidsbeskæftigede bedriftsrådsmedlemmers deltagelse i kurser" (Sjette Afdeling)
It was common ground that if Mrs Botel had worked full time, the AWSB would have been required, by virtue of the above Law, to pay her compensation on a full-time basis.
Ved kendelse af 24. oktober 1990, indgået til Domstolens Justitskontor den 10. december s.a., havde Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin stillet et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Traktatens artikel 119 og Rådets direktiv 75/117/EØF for at kunne bedømme, om nogle bestemmelser i den tyske Betriebsverfassungsgesetz er forenelige med ligelønsprincippet.
"Article 119 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 75/117/EEC of 10 February 1975 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the application of the principle of equal pay for men and women make it unlawful for national legislation applicable to many more women than men to limit, on the basis of their individual work timetable, the compensation that members of staff committees employed part-time are to receive from their employer in the form of paid holiday or pay for overtime in respect of their participation in training courses concerned with the activities of staff committees organized within the full-time work timetable in force in an undertaking but exceeding their individual work timetables, whilst the members of staff committees who work full time are compensated, for their participation in the same training courses, on the basis of a full-time work timetable.
Spørgsmålet var blevet rejst under en sag, som M. Botel, der er deltidsbeskæftiget hjemmehjælper, havde anlagt mod sin arbejdsgiver, AWSB, med krav om godtgørelse for at have deltaget i kurser.
It is open to a Member State to establish that such legislation is justified by objective factors unconnected with any discrimination based on sex."
Som formand for bedriftsrådet i et af sin arbejdsgivers kredsforbund deltog M. Bötel i seks kurser, som formidlede kundskaber, der er nødvendige for bedri ftsrådsarbejdet.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 28 January 1992.
Da M. Bötel anså sig for at være udsat for forskelsbehandling, indstævnte hun sin arbejdsgiver for Arbeitsgericht Berlin for at få godtgørelse for de yderligere timer.
"Article 119 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 75/117/EEC of 10 February 1975 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the application of the principle of equal pay for men and women
Domskonklusionen lød således:
14) and as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 220/85.
Medlemsstaten kan dog godtgøre, at lovgivningen er begrundet i objektive forhold, som intet har at gøre med forskelsbehandling på grundlag af køn."
Certain contracts provided for an increase of 4% of the FOB purchase price in consideration of that deferred payment.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 28. ianuar 1992.
The Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas, not being of the same view, required customs duties on that interest.
Han foreslog følgende:
The Court ruled as follows:
Ved kendelse af 26. oktober 1990, indgået til Domstolen den 23. januar 1991, havde Finanzgericht Hamburg forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål ved rørende fortolkningen i artikel 3 i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1495/80 i dennes oprindelige affattelse og i den ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 220/85 ændrede affattelse.
18 - valuation of goods for customs purposes, in its original version and as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 220/85 of 29 January 1985 must be interpreted in the same way as the term 'financing arrangement' used in Article 3(c) of the initial version of Regulation No 1495/80.
I henhold til købekontrakterne vedrørende de pågældende varer var Wünsche indrømmet en kredittid på 180 dage fra afskibningen. Ifølge visse af kontrakterne blev fob-pri sen forhøjet med 4% til gengæld for den nævnte kredittid.
Article 3 of Regulation No 1495/80 must be interpreted as meaning that the term "interest payable under a financing arrangement relating to the purchase of the Imported goods" includes interest payable by reason of the time allowed by the seller to the purchaser, and accepted by the latter, to pay for the imported goods."
Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas var ikke af samme opfattelse og krævede betalt told af rentebeløbet.
Mr Advocate General Marco Darmon delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 17 March 1992.
Udtrykket 'finansieringsordning' i artikel 3, stk. 2, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1495/80 af 11. juni 1980 om gennemførelse af visse bestemmelser i artikel 1, 3 og 8 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1224/80 om varers toldværdi, som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 220/85 af 29. januar 1985, skal fortolkes på samme måde som udtrykket 'finansieringsordning' i artikel 3, litra c), i forordning nr. 1495/80 i dennes oprindelige affattelse.
Article 3 of Commission Regulation No 1495/80 of 11 June 1980 implementing certain provisions of Articles 1, 3 and 8 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1224/80 must be interpreted as meaning that the term 'interest payable under a financing arrangement' refers to interest stipulated in connection with the grant by the seller of time for payment, whatever the length of the period granted.
Generaladvokat Marco Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Siette Afdeling) den 17. marts 1992.
In its second submission, the applicant contested the legality of the Commission's implied decision to refuse to grant to it, pursuant to Article 11(3)(e) of Decision 194/88, an advance on the quotas for the third quarter of 1988, inasmuch as that decision did not state its reasons (first limb), it was based on an incorrect interpretation of the provision in question (second limb) and it infringed the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations (third limb).
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse:
The Court of First
B. Retten i Første Instans i
Ordered the applicant to pay the costs.
Med det andet anbringende bestred sagsøgeren lovligheden af Kommissionens stiltiende beslutning om i medfør af artikel 11, stk. 3, litra e), i beslutning 194/88 ikke at tillade sagsøgeren forlods at anvende kvoter fra tredje kvartal 1988, da beslutningen ikke var begrundet (første del af anbringendet), er baseret på en fejlagtig fortolkning af den omtvistede bestemmelse (anden del) og er en tilsidesættelse af princippet om beskyttelsen af den berettigede forventning (tredje del).
Action to establish liability and obtain damages - Compensation for the loss caused to the applicant by the EIB's preventing it from securing the contract for construction of the high-voltage electricity line between Bamako Segou and Mal i.
Med det tredje anbringende gjorde sagsøgeren gældende, at EKSF-Traktatens artikel 36 var overtrådt, idet Kommissionen ikke havde meddelt sagsøgeren de beregninger, Kommissionen havde lagt til grund, da den pålagde sagsøgeren en bøde.
"that it has jurisdiction under Article 178 of the EEC Treaty, in conjunction with the second paragraph of Article 215 thereof, to decide the substantive issues in the present case."
Retten bemærkede hertil, at Kommissionen ved skrivelse af 23. februar 1989 havde givet sagsøgeren lejlighed til at fremsætte sine bemærkninger til den påståede overskridelse, og at dette anbringende derfor måtte forkastes.
Annulment of Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 3007/84 and Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 3813/90 - Power of the Commission to include in its implementing regulations penalties to be imposed in case of fraud.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
He considered that the Court should:
Sagsøgte frifindes.
Dismiss the application;
Sagsøgeren betaler sagens omkostninger."
Case C-69/91 Criminal proceedings against F. Decoster
Erstatningssøgsmål ­ erstatning af tab, som Den Europæiske Investeringsbank påstås at have påført sagsøgeren ved at forhindre denne i at få tildelt en kontrakt om bygning af højspændingsledningen Bamako Segou i Mali.
"Articles 30, 3(f), 86 and 90 of the EEC Treaty, together with Article 6 of Commission Directive 88/301/EEC of 16 May 1988 on terminal equipment, preclude the application of national provisions such as those contained in French Decree No 85-712 which require traders wishing to market terminal equipment to demonstrate - by way of type-approval or a similar procedure -that the equipment complies with certain requirements (relating in particular to user safety and the proper functioning of the network) unless at the same time there is guaranteed independence, from any trader offering goods or services in the telecommunications sector, on the part of the body which: issues the type-approval (or similar document); draws up the technical specifications used for the issuing of the type-approval (or similar document).
Generaladvokat Claus Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet i Domstolens plenum den 2. juni 1992.
Should the Court find it necessary to consider the other points raised in these proceedings, I propose the following answer to the national court: