natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ved stævning, indleveret den 23. marts 1992, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Den Italienske Republik havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter Euratom-Traktaten ved ikke at have ved taget de lov- og forvaltningsforskrifter, som var nødvendige for at efterkomme artikel 1, artikel 2, stk. 1 og 2, artikel 3 og artikel 5 i Rådets direktiv 84/466/Euratom.
By application lodged on 23 March 1992, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 1, 2(1) and (2), 3 and 5 of Council Directive 84/466/Euratom,
Den Italienske Republik erkendte, at direktivet formelt set ikke var blevet gennemført til italiensk ret, men at dette ikke var nødvendigt, fordi direktivets for skrifter i forvejen fandtes i nogle tilsvarende præcise bestemmelser i cirkulære nr. 62 af 2. august 1984, som var udstedt af sundhedsministeriet.
Although the Italian Republic acknowledged that formal transposition had not yet taken place, it stated that it was not necessary. The provisions contained in the directive already had an exact equivalent in Circular No 62 of 2 August 1984 issued by the Ministry of Health.
Domstolen bemærkede, at enhver medlemsstat efter Domstolens faste praksis er for pligtet til at gennemføre direktiver på en sådan måde, at det til fulde tilgodeser retssikkerhedskravet og derfor skal gennemføre dem til national ret ved udstedelse af bindende internretlige forskrifter.
The Court noted that, according to its consistent case-law, each Member State must implement directives in a manner which fully meets the requirement of legal certainty and must consequently transpose their terms into national law as binding provisions.
Det fremgik af parternes skriftlige og mundtlige indlæg, at det nævnte cirkulære ikke var officielt bekendtgjort, at de italienske myndigheder kunne ændre det efter eget skøn, og at det udelukkende indeholdt uforbindende henstillinger.
It appeared from the written statements and from the pleadings of the parties that the abovementioned circular had never been officially published, was subject to amendment by the Italian administration at will and that it only made recommendations which had no binding force.
Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter Euratom-Traktaten ved ikke at have vedtaget de lov- og forvaltningsforskrifter, som er nødvendige for at efterkomme artikel 1, artikel 2, stk. 1 og 2, artikel 3 og artikel 5 i Rådets direktiv 84/466/Euratom af 3. september 1984 om fast sættelse af grundlæggende foranstaltninger til strålebeskyttelse af personer, der underkastes medicinske undersøgelser og behandlinger.
By failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 1, 2(1) and(2), 3 and 5 of Council Directive 84/466/Euratom of 3 September 1984 laying down basic measures for the radiation protection of persons undergoing medical examination or treatment, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EAEC Treaty;
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 28. april 1993.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 28 April 1993.
Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter Euratom-Traktaten ved ikke at have vedtaget de lov- og forvaltningsforskrifter, som er nødvendige for at efterkomme Rådets direktiv 84/466/Euratom af 3. september 1984 om fastsættelse af grundlæggende foranstaltninger til strålebeskyttelse af personer, der underkastes medicinske undersøgelser og behandlinger,
By failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Council Directive 84/46/EURATOM of 3 September 1984 laying down basic measures for the radiation protection of persons undergoing medical examination or treatment, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
Sag C-183/91: Kommissionen mod Den Hellenske Republik
Case C-183/91 Commission ν Hellenic Republic 10 June 1993 (State aid - Exemption from a tax on export earnings - Repayment) (Full Court)
at have efterkommet Kommissionens beslutning 89/659/EØF.
By an application lodged on 15 July 1991 the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by not complying with Commission Decision 89/659/EEC, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Ved den græske finansministers bekendtgørelse nr. E. 3789/128 af 15. marts 1988 blev der indført en særlig engangsskat på visse virksomheders samlede indtægter i regnskabsåret 1987.
Decision E 3789/128, taken by the Finance Minister of the Hellenic Republic on 15 March 1988, established a special single tax on the total income of certain undertakings during the financial year 1987.
Den del af overskuddet, der hidrørte fra eksportindtægter, var dog fritaget i henhold til den ministerielle bekendtgørelses artikel 1, stk. 2.
Nevertheless, the first paragraph of Article 1 of that decision exempted the share of profits relating to export earnings.
I den førnævnte beslutning 89/659 blev det fastslået, at støtten var ulovlig, idet den var indført i strid med bestemmelserne i Traktatens artikel 93, stk. 3, og var uforenelig med fællesmarkedet, jf. Traktatens artikel 92, stk. 1, og at den særlige engangsskat måtte ændres omgående.
Decision 89/659 found that the aid given in breach of the provisions of Article 93(3) of the Treaty was illegal and that it was incompatible with the common market, within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty, and ordered immediate modification of the special single tax system.
Kommissionen krævede ligeledes, at støtten blev tilbagebetalt af de virksomheder, som havde nydt godt af den, i form af betaling af den del af skatten, der ikke var opkrævet.
The Commission also ordered the recovery of the aid from the undertakings to which it had been granted by means of payment of the part of the tax which had not been charged.
Den Hellenske Republik gjorde gældende, at Kommissionens beslutning er ulovlig, og at det er absolut umuligt at gennemføre den.
The Hellenic Republic maintained that the Commission Decision was unlawful and that it was absolutely impossible to implement it.
Domstolen bemærkede, at det er ubestridt, at hverken den græske regering eller de virksomheder, der nød godt af skattefritagelsen, har anlagt annullationssøgsmål mod den omhandlede beslutning i medfør af Traktatens artikel 173, og at beslutningen derfor er blevet endelig.
It was common ground that neither the Hellenic Government nor the undertakings benefiting from the exemption had brought an action for the annulment of the decision in question under Article 173 of the Treaty and that, consequently it had become definitive.
På den baggrund er Den Hellenske Republik ikke længere berettiget til at anfægte beslutningens gyldighed.
The Hellenic Government was therefore no longer able to bring into question the validity of the decision.
Hvad angår de andre argumenter, den græske regering anførte, understregede Domstolen, at det forhold, at den medlemsstat, som beslutningen er rettet til, ikke under en sag som den foreliggende kan påberåbe sig andre indsigelser end absolut umulighed for gennemførelsen, ikke er til hinder for, at en medlemsstat, der under gennemførelsen af en sådan beslutning støder på uforudsete og uforudsigelige vanskeligheder, eller får kendskab til følger, der ikke er forudset af Kommissionen, forelægger Kommissionen disse problemer til vurdering med forslag om passende ændringer af den pågældende beslutning.
As regards the other arguments relied upon by the Hellenic Government, the Court pointed out that, in an action such as the present one, the fact that a State to whom a decision is addressed could only raise the argument that it was absolutely impossible to implement the decision does not mean that if, in giving effect to a such a decision, a Member State encounters unforeseen or unforeseeable difficulties or perceives consequences overlooked by the Commission, it may not submit these problems for consideration by the Commission, together with proposals for suitable amendments.
I det foreliggende tilfælde har den sagsøgte regering blot meddelt Kommissionen de retlige og praktiske problemer, som en gennemførelse af beslutningen indebar, uden at foretage nogen henvendelse af nogen art til de omhandlede virksomheder med henblik på at få tilbagebetalt støtten og uden at foreslå Kommissionen alternative foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af beslutningen, som havde kunnet løse de omhandlede problemer.
In the present action, the defendant restricted itself to informing the Commission of its legal and practical difficulties which implementation of the decision presented without taking any measure at all in relation to the undertakings in question in order to recover the aid and without submitting to the Commission alternative means of implementing the decision which would have allowed the alleged difficulties to have been overcome.
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 17. februar 1993.
"(1) By not complying with Commission Decision 89/659/EEC of 3 May 1989 on aid granted to export undertakings in the form of exemption from a special single tax - introduced by Ministerial Decision No E 3789/128 of 15 March 1988 - in respect of the share of profits relating to export earnings, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
He proposed that the Court should answer as follows :
Den Hellenske Republik har tilsidesat sine forpligtelser i henhold til EØF-Traktaten ved ikke at have efterkommet Kommissionens beslutning 89/659/EØF af 3. maj 1989 om den græske regerings bekendtgørelse nr. E. 3789/128 om en særlig engangsskat på virksomheder.
By failing to comply with Commission Decision 89/659/EEC of 3 May 1989 on Ministerial Decision No E 3789/128 of the Greek Government establishing a special single tax on undertakings, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;
FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE
Court of First Instance
Sag C-355/90: Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Spanien
Case C­93/92 Firma CMC Motorradcenter GmbH ν Baski'ciogullari
Traktatbrud - tilsidesættelse af direktiv 79/409/EØF om beskyttelse af vilde fugle - national lov ikke i overensstemmelse med direktivet.
Interpretation of Article 30 of the EEC Treaty ­ National precedent requiring parallel importers to draw purchasers' attention to the risks flowing from the unlawful conduct of agents ­ Yamaha Motorcycles.
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 9. juni 1993.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 8 June 1993.
Han foreslog Domstolen at kende for ret, at
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 30 og 36 i relation til en medlemsstats varemærkelovgivning, hvorefter der er givet eneret til et varemærke, der består i et ord, som er meget gængs i en anden medlemsstats sprog (quattro).
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations ­ Infringement of Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds ­ Non­compliance of national legislation with the directive.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 9. juni 1993.
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 9 June 1993.
"Så længe der ikke er vedtaget fællesskabsbestemmelser om harmonisering, er Traktatens artikel 30 og 36 ikke til hinder for anvendelse af bestemmelser og kriterier i national ret, der fastlægger, om - og på hvilke betingelser - man
"The Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations by omitting to classify the Marismas de Santoña as a special protection area in breach of Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, and by omitting, in breach of Article 4(4) of that directive to take appropriate steps to avoid pollution or deterioration of habitats or any disturbances affecting the birds by filling in sea barriers around the industrial areas planned for Laredo and Col indres (it should be noted, on that point, that the Kingdom of Spain has undertaken to demolish those barriers) by the building of a new road between Argoños and Santoña, by certain aquaculture projects within the marshy areas and/or by failing to demolish barriers and retaining walls around areas reserved for those projects, and by tipping unpurified residues into the marshes from neighbouring municipalities;
10 skal anerkende en varemærkeret med hensyn til talangivelser som den i hovedsagen omhandlede.
10 for the remainder, dismiss the Commission's application; order the Kingdom of Spain to bear two-thirds and the Commission onethird of the costs."
Fortolkning af artikel 9, stk. 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet - en arbejdstager, der har tilbagelagt en bidragsperiode i henhold til den tvungne forsikringsordning i en medlemsstat -adgang til frivillig fortsat forsikring i en anden medlemsstat.
Interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty as regards trade­mark law of one Member State which accords exclusive rights to a trade-mark consisting of a word which occurs very frequently in the language of another Member State (quattro).
Generaladvokat F. G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 9. juni 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 9 June 1993
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse:
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows.
"Artikel 9, stk. 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 skal fortolkes således, at den ikke kræver, at en medlemsstat skal tage hensyn til forsikringsperioder, der er tilbagelagt i henhold til lovgivningen i en anden medlemsstat, såfremt den berørte person aldrig har været medlem af en social sikringsordning i den førstnævnte medlemsstat, og et sådant med lemsskab er en nødvendig betingelse for adgang til en frivillig fortsat forsikring i henhold til dette lands lovgivning".
Moreover, it is for the national authorities to determine, on the basis of the provisions and criteria of national law, whether or not there is a risk of confusing similar trade-marks which belong to separate undertakings. Where they grant a trade-mark right to a certain undertaking and where they assess whether there is a risk of confusion due to the use, by another undertaking, of a distinctive sign similar to the trade-mark in question, the national authorities cannot in any event adopt measures which lead to arbitrary discrimination or to a disguised restriction on trade between Member States within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 36 of the Treaty".
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling) den 10. juni 1993.
Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 9 June 1993.
Fortolkning af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 765/86 om nærmere bestemmelser for salg af smør fra interventionslagre med henblik på udførsel til visse bestemmelsessteder - fortabelse af sikkerheden - force majeure.
Interpretation of subheading 9030 81 90 of the Common Customs Tariff -Combined Nomenclature 1990 - Thermorecorder.
Generaladvokat C. Gul mann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 10. juni 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 10 June 1993.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål på følgende måde:
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
Det påhviler den nationale ret at afgøre, om disse forudsætninger er opfyldt i den foreliggende sag."
Case C-124/92 An Board Bainne Co-operative and Others ν Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 93/128/EØF af 26. februar 1993 om visse beskyttelsesforanstaltninger mod smitsomt blæreudslæt hos svin i Nederlandene og Italien - eksportforbud for levende svin fra 26. februar til 1. april 1993 (ophævet den 26. marts 1993) - erstatningsansvar uden for kontraktforhold, EØF-Traktatens artikel 215, stk. 2.
"Article 6(1) of Commission Regulation No 765/86 of 14 March 1986 must be interpreted as meaning that the tendering security lodged under that provision is not to be forfeit if it can be established that the failure to comply with the tendering conditions set out in that provision was due to a change in the quality requirements for the goods in question which had previously been applicable in the country of importation, provided that a prudent and careful trader and any party to a contract with that trader had not foreseen, and had no reason to foresee, that change, and also provided that the
Sag C-275/93-P: Michael Boessen mod Det Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg
It is for the national court to determine whether those conditions have been satisfied in this case."
Delvis annullation af artikel 18 og 19 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 af 13. februar 1993 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer - ordning for samhandelen me < tredjelande (forordningens afsnit IV) - ophævelse af det tyske toldkontingent (artikel 21, stk. 2). Sag C-281/93 European Rice Brokers m.fl mod Kommissionen
Case C-273/93 Martin Weber ν Commission Partial Annulment of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 525/93 of 8 March 1993 establishing the value of the final regional reference amounts for producers of soya beans, rape seed, colza seed and sunflower seed for the 1992/93 marketing year
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning nr. 93/127/EØF af 25. februar 1993 om indførelse af beskyttelsesforanstaltninger vedrørende ris med oprindelse i De Nederlandske Antiller - erstatningsansvar uden for kontraktforhold som følge af dei anfægtede retsakt.
Case C-274/93 Commission ν Luxembourg Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes
Sag C-282/93: Comafrica m.fl. mod Rådet og Kommissionen
Case C-275/93 Michael Boessen ν Economic and Social Committee Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), delivered on 11 March 1993, in Case T-87/91
Delvis annullation af artikel 15, 18 og 19 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 af 13. februar 1993 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer - tildeling af licenser tildeling af toldkontingenter.
Case C-276/93 Chiquita Banana Company and Others ν Council Annulment of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas
Delvis annullation af artikel 15, stk. 2, og artikel 18 og 19 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 af 13. februar 1993 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer erstatning af tab som følge af den anfægtede retsakt - EØF-Traktatens artikel 215, stk. 2.
Preliminary ruling ­ Bundesfinanzhof ­ Interpretation of Article 48 of the EEC Treaty as regards a system of national taxation on the income of non­residents
Sag C-284/93: Interbreu Belgium mod Alain Paul Raymond Ghislain Roppe
Case C­280/93 Germany ν Council Partial annulment of Article 18 and 19 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas ­ Trade with third countries (Title IV of the Regulation) ­Discontinuation of the German tariff quota (Article 21(2))
Præjudiciel - Justice de Paix, Bruxelles - fortolkning af artikel 6, stk. 1, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1984/83 af 22. juni 1983 om anvendelse af Traktatens artikel 85, stk. 3, på kategorier af eksklusive købsaftaler - særlige økonomiske eller finansielle fordele ved en lejekontrakt vedrørende lokaler, hvori der drives restauration.
Case C­281/93 European Rice Brokers and Others ν Commission Annulment of Commission Decision 93/127/EEC of 25 February 1993 introducing safeguard measures in respect of rice originating in the Netherlands Antilles ­ Non­contractual liability for the disputed measure
Præjudiciel - Finanzgericht München - fortolkning af artikel 12 ("direkte salg") 1 Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 857/84 af 31. marts 1984 om almindelige regler for anvendelsen af den i artikel 5c i forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68 omhandlede afgift på mælk og mejeriprodukter - gyldigheden af artikel 4, stk. 1, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1371/84 af 16. maj 1984 om gennemførelsesbestemmelserne for den tillægsafgift, der er omhandlet i artikel 5c i forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68.
Case C­283/93 Pacific Fruit Company Italy ν Council and Commission Partial annulment of Articles 15, 18 and 19 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas ­ Compensation for damage arising from the disputed measure ­Article 215(2) of the EEC Treaty
Retten
Case C­284/93 Interbrew
Sag om fortolkning af dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Fjerde Afdeling) den 27. februar 1992.
Preliminary ruling ·■ Justice de Paix, Brussels ­ Interpretation of Article 6(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 of 22 June 1983 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of exclusive purchasing agreements ­ Special commercial or financial advantage of a lease of premises run for the sale and consumption of drinks
Sag om fortolkning af dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Femte Afdeling) den 11. februar 1993.
Case C­285/93 Domi ni kaneri nnen-Kl oster Al tenhohenau HZA Rosenheim Preliminary ruling ­ Finanzgericht München ­ Interpretation of Article 12 (Direct Sale) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector ­ Validity of Article 4(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 laying down detailed rules for the application of the additional levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 1. april 1993 vedrørende en procedure anvendelse af EØF-Traktatens artikel 85 (IV/30.177 Eurochèque: Helsinki-aftalen) aftale om indløsning af eurocheques trukket på udenlandske pengeinstitutter i den franske non-banking sektor - kontradiktionsprincippet - erstatningskrav.
Case T-34/93 Société Générale ν Commission Annulment of Commission Decision of 25 March 1992 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty ((V/30.177 Eurocheque: Helsinki Agreement) - Agreement on theacceptance by traders in France of Eurocheques drawn on foreign financial institutions - Right to a fair hearing - Application for damages
Sag T-36/93: Girish Ojha mod Kommissionen
Case T-36/93 Girish Ojha ν Commission (Staff case)
Tjenestemandssag
Case T-37/93 Dimi trios (Staff case)
Sag T-39/93: Michael Baltsavias mod Kommissionen
Case T-39/93 Michael Baltsavias (Staff case)
Rådet for De Europeiske Fællesskabers afgørelse af 8. juni 1993 om overførelse af nye kompetenceområder til Retten i Første Instans
Decision of the Council of the European Communities of 8 June 1993 to extend the jurisdiction transferred to the Court of First Instance
På et møde i Luxembourg den 8. juni 1993 har Ministerrådet truffet en afgørelse i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 168 A og tildelt De Europæiske Fællesskabers Ret i Første Instans kompetence til i første instans at træffe afgørelse i alle sager, der indbringes af fysiske eller juridiske personer.
At its meeting on 8 June 1993 in Luxembourg, the Council of Ministers adopted a decision under Article 168a(l) of the EEC Treaty in which it gave the Court of First Instance of the European Communities jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance all actions brought by natural or legal persons.