natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Præjudiciel »Differentierede eksportrestitutioner — force majeure — forhøjebe sikkerhedsstillebe — resolution vedtaget af FN's Sikkerhedsråd* (Sjette Afdeling) minister for landbrug, ernæring og skovbrug, »ministeriet«).
40), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive.
Ved kendelse af 25. juli 1994 har Irlands High Court stillet tre præjudicielle spørgsmål om fortolkningen og gyldigheden af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2340/90 og Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3665/87.
Article 19(1) of Directive 91/271 provides that the Member States are to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that directive not later than 30 June 1993 and immediately to inform the Commission thereof.
Den 28. marts 1990 indgik AIB m.fl. to kontrakter med Iraks statslige indkøbskonlor med henblik på levering af nogle parlier udbenet oksekød, som skulle leveres fragt- og omkostningsfrit i Bagdad, Basrah og Mosul.
Although the Hellenic Republic contends that the application should be dismissed, it does not deny that the directive has not been transposed into national law within the prescribed period.
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst under en sag mellem Anglo Irish Beef Processors International m.fl. (»AIB m.fl.«), en sammenslutning af otte irske virksomheder i sektoren for forarbejdning og eksport af oksekød, og Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry (den britiske
Since the directive has not been transposed within the prescribed period, the action brought by the Commission in relation to that failure must be regarded as well founded.
Den 3. august 1990 gav de irakiske myndigheder endelig tilladelse til at foretage transporten af oksekødet til Irak.
Advocate General N. Fennellv delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 1 February 1996.
Artikel 33, stk. 5, i forordning nr. 3665/87 bestemmer, at hvis restitutionen som følge af force majeure er mindre end den forudbetalte restitution, er den sikkerhedsstillelse, der fortabes, lig med forskellen mellem det forudbetalte restitutionsbeløb og det faktisk berettigede restitutionsbeløb.
Ί) declare that by not implementing within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the third paragraph of Article 189 of the Treaty and under Article 19 of Directive 91/271;
Denne forordning forbød udførsel til Irak og Kuwait af alle varer med oprindelse i eller hidrørende fra Fællesskabet.
2) order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.'
Den forelæggende ret spørger ligeledes, om forordning nr. 3665/87 under de i forelæggelseskendelsen beskrevne omstændigheder kan fortolkes således, at den forbyder at beholde sikkerhedsstillelsen på grund af den uforholdsmæssige virkning for eksportøren eller af en anden grund.
Preliminary ruling (Social security for migrant workers — Family benefits — Article 74 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71) (Sixth Chamber) and subsequently by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3427/89 of 30 October 1989 (OJ 1989 L 331, p. 1, hereinafter 'Regulation No 1408/71').
I henhold til artikel 19, stk. 1, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2220/85 krævede ministeriet tilbagebetaling af forskellen mellem den forudbetalte restitution og den restitution, der faktisk skulle betales, og nægtede at frigive bankgarantien, så længe AIB m.fl. ikke havde tilbagebetalt dette beløb.
That question has arisen in a dispute between Mr Moreno and the Bundesanstalt fur Arbeit (Federal Labour Office) concerning the latter's refusal to pay family benefits to Mr Moreno for the months of January and February 1993.
Da den faktiske adgang til bestemmelsesstedets marked i princippet er betinget af, at der opfyldes formaliteter for overgang til forbrug i bestemmelseslandet, udelukker den omstændighed, at produktet ikke har nået dette bestemmelsessted og har måttet udføres til andre bestemmelsessteder på grund af force majeure, at det med henblik på udbetaling af den differentierede restitution kan anses for at være udført i artikel 5, stk. l's forstand i forordning nr. 3665/87.
By order of 29 August 1994, received at the Court on 8 September 1994, the Sozialgericht (Social Court) Stuttgart referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the EC Treaty a question on the interpretation of Article 74 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p.
Da ministeriet ikke har tilsluttet sig denne opfattelse, har sagsøgerne i hovedsagen anlagt sag ved Irlands High Court.
416), as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983 (OJ 1983 L 230, p. 6)
Med det andet spørgsmål ønskes det klarlagt, om forordning nr. 3665/87 er ugyldig, for så vidt den ikke giver mulighed for tilbagebetaling af hele sikkerhedsstillelsen i tilfælde af force majeure.
Mr Moreno, who is a Spanish national, was employed in Germany from 1966 to 15 December 1992 and on that basis received family benefits
varerne ikke faktisk er blevet udført fra Fællesskabet inden for de fastsatte frister.
from the Bundesanstalt für Arbeit for his two sons, who were studying in Spain.
Det følger heraf, at disse bestemmelser ikke kan give anledning til nogen anden berettiget forventning end forventningen om at få ret til restitutionen inden for de grænser, der gælder for den.
guarantee of accident insurance provided for by Paragraph 165 of the AFG.
Heraf følger, at fortabelse af en del af sikkerheden, som svarer til forskellen mellem det forudbetalte restitutionsbeløb og det faktisk berettigede restitutionsbeløb, uden pålæggelse af noget strafbeløb, står i rimeligt forhold til det af lovgiver tilstræbte formål.
By decision of 6 April 1993, the Bundesanstalt fur Arbeit refused to pay family benefits to Mr Moreno for the months of January and February 1993 on the ground that Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71 required, for the granting of family benefits, that the recipient should in fact be drawing unemployment benefit.
Den forelæggende rets tredje spørgsmål går i det væsentlige ud på, om forordning nr. 2340/90 kan fortolkes således, at den ligeledes omfatter varer, som allerede er afsendt og under transport til Irak, og om den i bekræftende fald er helt eller delvis ugyldig på grund af den måde, hvorpå den behandler varer, som er under transport under de i forelæggelseskendelsen beskrevne omstændigheder.
In the light of that fact, the Bundesanstalt fur Arbeit adopted two decisions in respect of Mr Moreno under the Arbeitsförderungsgesetz (Law on Employment Promotion) of 25 June 1969 (hereinafter the 'AFG') (Bundesgesetzblatt I, p. 582), as amended.
Med hensyn til den hævdede tilsidesættelse af princippet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning bemærkes først, at artikel 33, stk. 5, i forordning nr. 3665/87 bestemmer, at hvis restitutionen som følge af force majeure er mindre end den forudbetalte restitution, er den sikkerhedsstillelse, der fortabes, lig med forskellen mellem det forudbetalte restitutionsbeløb og det faktisk berettigede restitutionsbeløb.
It is necessary here to ask whether, although the Bundesanstalt fur Arbeit did not, during the disputed period, pay to Mr Moreno any unemployment benefit in cash by reason of the suspension and exclusion measures, he must be regarded as having drawn unemployment benefits within the meaning of that provision.
Det følger heraf, at spørgsmålet, om forordning nr. 2340/90 er gyldig, savner enhver forbindelse med realiteten i hovedsagen eller dennes genstand. Følgelig må det tredje spørgsmål lades ubesvaret.
The Bundesanstalt für Arbeit first decided to suspend Mr Moreno's entitlement to unemployment benefit for the period from 16 December 1992 to 21 February 1993, pursuant to Paragraph 117(2) and (3) of the AFG.
Som generaladvokaten har anført i punkt 7 i sit forslag til afgørelse, siges det i øvrigt udtrykkeligt i den femte betragtning til forordning nr. 565/80, at sikkerhedsstillelsen har til formål at garantere tilbagebetaling afmindst det udbetalte beløb, hvis det senere fastslås, at der ikke var nogen ret til eksportrestitution, eller når produkterne eller
Under those provisions, an unemployed person whose employment contract has been terminated without observance of a period of notice and who receives compensation from his employer is subject to suspension of his entitlement to unemployment benefit for a period the duration of which depends on the amount of compensation paid.
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
The question therefore arises as to whether that compensation should be treated as an unemployment benefit for the purposes of Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71.
Artikel 33, stk 5, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3665/87 af 27. november 1987 om fælles gennemførelsesbestemmeber for eksportrestitutioner for landbrugsprodukter, som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 354/90 af 9. februar 1990, skal fortolkes således, at når varer som følge af force majeure ikke når frem til deres bestemmebesland, men udføres til andre tredjelande, hvor eksportrestitutionen er lavere eller ikke findes, erden sikkerhedsstillebe, der fortabes, lig med forskellen mellem det forudbetalte restitutionsbeløb og det faktisk berettigede restitutionsbeløb.
Secondly, the Bundesanstalt für Arbeit decided that benefit should be withheld from Mr Moreno for the period from 16 December 1992 to 9 March 1993 pursuant to the combined provisions of Paragraphs 119 and 119a of the AFG. Those provisions state that if an unemployed person has terminated the employment relationship or if his conduct in breach of the employment contract has given rise to termination of the employment relationship and thus brought about his unemployment either intentionally or through gross negligence, that person is to be excluded from unemployment benefit for a specified period.
Gennemgangen af forordning nr. 3665/87 har intet frembragt, der kan rejse tvivl om dens gyldighed*
Finally, as the German Government has argued, the compensation referred to in Paragraph 117 of the AFG partially replaces the unemployment benefit to which the unemployed worker is in principle entitled.
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse:
Temporary exclusion
2) Gennemgangen af de i forelæggelseskendelsen indeholdte oplysninger har intet frembragt, der kan rejse tvivl om gyldigheden af forordning (EØF) nr. 3665/87.«
With regard to the temporary exclusion of Mr Moreno, it is necessary to consider whether that measure prevents him from drawing any unemployment benefit
»Tjenestemænd — ansættebe — udvælgelsesprøve for kategori C — adgang til at deltage i udvælgebesprøve nægtet — ansøgere med en universitetsuddannelse* (Første Afdeling)
It should be noted that Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71 uses the term 'unemployment benefits' without drawing any distinction between cash benefits and other benefits and without requiring, as a condition of its application, that the person concerned draws all of the benefits provided for under the legislation of the competent State during the period of unemployment.
Faktiske omstændigheder og retsforhandlinger opnået en Honours Degree i fransk og italiensk litteratur fra University College i Dublin.
It follows that this provision does not impose any condition with regard to the nature of the unemployment benefits.
Muireann Noonan, der er midlertidigt ansat ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol, indgav ansøgning til almindelig udvælgelsesprøve KOM/C/741, der blev afholdt af Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber med henblik på oprettelse af en ansættelsesreserve af engelsksprogede maskinskrivere — C5/C4.
Consequently, in so far as the unemployed worker excluded from unemployment benefits in cash continues, under the legislation of the competent State, to be covered against the risks of sickness and accidents, the expression 'unemployment benefits under the legislation of a Member State' used in Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71 must be understood as covering these types of benefit as well.
M. Noonan har herefter ved stævning indleveret til Rettens Justitskontor den 21. august 1992 anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af udvælgelseskomiteens førnævnte afgørelse om ikke at give hende adgang til prøven. Hun har i denne forbindelse gjort gældende, at de nævnte bestemmelser i meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøve, som er anført som begrundelse for afslaget, er ulovlige.
It follows that an unemployed person who continues, during a period of temporary exclusion, to be covered, pursuant to national legislation, in respect of sickness and accidents must be regarded as drawing unemployment benefits within the meaning of Article 74 of Regulation No 1408/71.
som ansøgere, der ikke har en universitetsuddannelse, men som alligevel befinder sig i samme situation som førstnævnte gruppe. Efter karakteren af dette anbringende gør sagsøgeren således gældende, at den anfægtede betingelse i meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøve er i strid med ligebehandlingsprincippet.
State' also covers unemployed persons registered with the competent national authority whose entitlement to unemployment benefit has been suspended because compensation was paid to them by their employer by reason of the fact that the employment relationship was terminated without observance of a period of notice, or because payment of unemployment benefits in cash was temporarily excluded, in cases where, during that period of exclusion, they are covered against the risks of sickness and accidents under the legislation of the competent State.'
Den anfægtede betingelse i meddelelsen om udvælgelsesprøve og dermed den anfægtede beslutning må herefter anses for ulovlige, idet de er i strid med ligebehandlingsprincippet sammenholdt med vedtægtens artikel 27.
Advocate General M.B. Elmer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 7 December 1995.
Det samme gælder med hensyn til artikel 1, stk. 1, i bilag III til vedtægten, herunder bestemmelsens litra d). Det må fastslås, at den anfægtede betingelse ikke vedrører de »til de stillinger, der skal besættes, nødvendige diplomer og andre kvalifikationsbeviser«, men derimod eksamensbeviser, som — hvis ansøgeren er i besiddelse heraf — udelukker vedkommende fra udvælgelsesprøven.
'Article 74 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3427/89 of 30 October 1989, must be interpreted as meaning that the expression "unemployed person who... draws unemployment benefits under the legislation of a Member State" includes unemployed persons registered with the labour office whose entitlement to unemployment benefit has, under rules such as those laid down in German legislation, been suspended because compensation was paid to them by their employer on termination of their employment or because of a temporary exclusion period, if, under rules such as those laid down in German legislation, they are covered by sickness and accident insurance during that temporary exclusion period.'
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Case C-299/94 Anglo Irish Beef Processors International and Others ν Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry Agriculture
Afgøreben, hvorved udvælgebeskomitéen for den almindelige udvælgelsesprøve KOM/C/741 nægtede sagsøgeren adgang til at deltage i udvælgelsesprøven, annulleres.
1) and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1987 L 351, p.
V. / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Personalesag
Under Article 19(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products (OJ 1985 L 205, p.
»Tjenestemænd — disciplinærordning — fjernebe fra tjenesten — begrundebe — skærpende omstændigheder* (Femte Afdeling)
Since the Minister does not accept that argument, the plaintiffs brought proceedings before the High Court of Ireland.
Udtalelse 2/94 Udtalelse i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 228, stk. 6 Forbindelser udadtil
The Minister paid the export refunds in advance, pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 565/80 of 4 March 1980 on the advance payment of export refunds in respect of agricultural products (OJ 1980 L 62, p.
28.3.1996 til beskyttebe af menneskerettigheder og
In accordance with those regulations, the plaintiffs provided a bank guarantee in the Minister's favour, equal to 120% of the amount advanced by way of export refunds.
»Fællesskabets tiltrædebe af konventionen grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder* (Domstolens plenum)
By its first question, the national court essentially asks whether Regulation No 3665/87, cited above, must be interpreted — bearing in mind that, owing to force majeure, the goods were exported to a destination other than that originally intended — as precluding an intervention agency from withholding such proportion of the security lodged as corresponds to the amount that was not payable to the recipient, on account of the disproportionate effect of forfeiture of the security by comparison with the matters set out in the order for reference by way of justification for such forfeiture, or for any other reason.
Ved begæring indgivet til Domstolens Justitskontor den 26. april 1994 har Rådet for Den Europæiske Union i medfør af EF-traktatens artikel 22S, stk. 6, anmodet Domstolen om en udtalelse.
Under Article 33(5) of Regulation No 3665/87, where, as a result of a case of force majeure, the amount of the refund is smaller than the amount paid in advance, the security forfeited is to be equal to the difference between the amount of the refund advanced and the amount of the refund actually due.
Rådet har anmodet Domstolen om en udtalelse om følgende spørgsmål:
That regulation prohibited the export to Iraq or Kuwait of any product originating in, or coming from, the Community.
Irland og Det Forenede Kongerige, men også den danske og den svenske regering har anført, at begæringen om udtalelse ikke kan antages til realitetsbehandling, eller har i det mindste henvist til, at den er fremsat for tidligt.
Consequently, in a case such as this, in which it is undisputed that the circumstances which prevented the plaintiffs from exporting the beef to Iraq amount to force majeure, the intervention agency may withhold the security, as provided for by Article 33(5) of Regulation No 3665/87.
De har påpeget, at der ikke foreligger en aftale med et indhold, der er tilstrækkelig præcist til, at Domstolen kan efterprøve, om tiltrædelsen er forenelig med traktaten.
Because of the trade embargo, Turkey refused to allow transit of the goods across its territory.
Ifølge disse regeringer kan det ikke gøres gældende, at der er tale om en påtænkt aftale, da Rådet endnu ikke har truffet en principbeslutning om at indlede forhandlinger om aftalen.
However, the beef was exported to other nonmember countries, all in areas which qualified for a lower export refund than that for Iraq, or even for no refund at all.
»Vil Det Europæiske Fællesskabs tiltrædelse af konventionen af 4. november 1950 til beskyttelse af menneskerettigheder og grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder (herefter 'konventionen') være forenelig med traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab?«
The national court also asks whether, in the circumstances set out in the order for reference, Regulation No 3665/87 may be interpreted as precluding forfeiture of the guarantee on account of the disproportionate effect for the exporter, or for some other reason.
nødvendig for yderligere at fastlægge genstanden herfor.
refund or that the products or goods were not actually exported from the Community within the time-limits laid down.
Som Domstolen senest har fastslået i udtalelse 3/94 af 13. december 1995, er hensigten med traktatens artikel 228, stk. 6, at forhindre de forviklinger, der ville opstå, hvis det ad rettens vej blev gjort gældende, at Fællesskabets bindende internationale aftaler var uforenelige med traktaten.
It follows that those provisions cannot give rise to any legitimate expectation other than entitlement to a refund subject to the conditions laid down.
Med henblik på at undgå sådanne forviklinger har traktaten hjemlet den ekstraordinære procedure med en forudgående forelæggelse for Domstolen, for at det før aftalens indgåelse kan klarlægges, om denne er forenelig med traktaten.
Since actual access to the market of destination is in principle conditional on the completion of customs formalities for the release of the goods into free circulation in the country of destination, the fact that the consignment did not reach that destination and, owing to force majeure, had to be exported to other countries rules out the possibility of its being regarded, for the purposes of payment of the differentiated refund, as having been imported within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation No 3665/87.
Det samme gælder imidlertid ikke med hensyn til spørgsmålet om aftalens forenelighed med traktaten.
The second question asks whether Regulation No 3665/87 is invalid in so far as it does not allow the security to be reimbursed in full in cases of force majeure.
Spørgsmålet om Fællesskabets tiltrædelse af konventionen rejser to hovedproblemer, nemlig dels om Fællesskabet har kompetence til at indgå en sådan aftale, dels om aftalen vil være forenelig med traktatens bestemmelser, navnlig bestemmelserne om Domstolens beføjelser.
By its third question the national court asks essentially whether Regulation No 2340/90 may be interpreted as extending to goods already dispatched and in transit to Iraq and, if so, whether it is wholly or partly invalid, having regard to the treatment which it accords to goods in transit in the circumstances set out in the order for reference.
Domstolen er derfor ikke i stand til at afgive en udtalelse om, hvorvidt tiltrædelsen af konventionen vil være forenelig med traktatens bestemmelser.
If, according to the order for reference, the goods failed to reach their destination, it was because of the measures adopted by the Turkish authorities, who refused to allow transit on account of the trade embargo imposed by the UN.
Hvad angår kompetencespørgsmålet, bemærkes, at Domstolen i udtalelse 1/78 af 4. oktober 1979 fastslog, at når der er tale om at afgøre et kompetencespørgsmål, er det i fællesskabsinstitutionernes og de pågældende staters, herunder tredjelandenes, interesse, at dette spørgsmål er løst, straks når den pågældende forhandling påbegyndes, og inden de væsentligste elementer i aftalen er forhandlet.
As regards the alleged breach of the principle of proportionality, it should be borne in mind that the purpose of the system of differentiated refunds is to gain or to maintain access for Community exports to the markets of the nonmember countries concerned, the reason for differentiated refunds being the desire to take account of the particular characteristics of each import market in which the Community wishes to play a part.
Det fremgår af traktatens artikel 3 B, hvorefter Fællesskabet handler inden for rammerne af de beføjelser og mål, der er tillagt det ved traktaten, at det kun råder over tildelte kompetencer.
Accordingly, the question of the validity of Regulation No 2340/90 bears no relation to the actual facts of the case or to the purpose of the action.
Det må fastslås, al ingen bestemmelse i traktaten på generel måde tillægger Fællesskabets institutioner beføjelse til at fastsætte regler om menneskerettigheder eller indgå internationale aftaler på dette område.
It follows that forfeiture of a part of the security equal to the difference between the amount of the refund paid in advance and the amount of the refund actually due, without any penalty being imposed, is commensurate with the objective pursued by the legislature.