natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst under en sag, der føres af selskaberne Sebago Inc. og Ancienne Maison Dubois et Fils SA mod G-B Unie SA vedrørende sidstnævnte selskabs salg af varer, der er forsynet med et varemærke, som Sebago er indehaver af, men uden dettes samtykke.
By judgment of 30 April 1998 the Cour d'Appel (Court of Appeal), Brussels, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling various questions on the interpretation of Article 7 of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 ('the Directive'), as amended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 ('the EEA Agreement').
Sebago er et selskab, der er registreret i Amerikas Forenede Stater og indehaver af to Benelux-ordmærker for navnet »Docksides« og tre Benelux-ordmærker for navnet »Sebago«.
from 29 May until 11 June 1996, GB-Unic advertised Docksides Sebago shoes for sale in its Maxi-GB hypermarkets. The goods in question were 2 561 pairs of shoes manufactured in El Salvador and purchased from a company incorporated under Belgian law which specialises in parallel importation.
Disse varemærker er bl.a. registreret for sko.
The entire stock was sold during the summer of 1996.
Maison Dubois er eneforhandler for Benelux af sko, der er forsynet med Sebago's mærker.
Sebago and Maison Dubois do not dispute that the shoes sold by GB-Unic were genuine goods.
Det skal først fastslås, at Domstolen allerede havde besvaret de tre første præjudicielle spørgsmål i dommen af 16. juli 1998 i Silhouette International Schmied-sagen.
Those questions were raised in proceedings between Sebago Inc. and Ancienne Maison Dubois et Fils SA on the one hand, and GB-Unic SA on the other, concerning the sale by GB-Unic, without Sebago's consent, of goods bearing a trade mark of which Sebago is the proprietor.
Domstolen har nemlig i denne dom fastslået, at efter direktivets artikel 7 indtræder der kun konsumption af de rettigheder, der er knyttet til varemærket, hvis varerne er blevet markedsført inden for Fællesskabet (inden for EØS efter ikrafttrædelsen af EØS-aftalen), og at medlemsstaterne ikke efter direktivet har mulighed for i deres nationale ret at foreskrive konsumption af de rettigheder, der er knyttet til varemærket, for varer, der er markedsført i tredjelande.
In those circumstances, Sebago and Maison Dubois claimed before the Belgian courts that GB-Unic had infringed Sebago's trade-mark right by marketing those goods within the Community without their consent.
I tiende udgave af sin reklamefolder for 1996 »La quinzaine Maxi-GB«, der angav priser med gyldighed fra den 29. maj til den 11. juni 1996, reklamerede G-B Unie for salg i selskabets Maxi-GB supermarkeder af sko af mærkerne Docsides Sebago.
Sebago is a company incorporated in the United States of America and is the proprietor of two Benelux trade marks in the name 'Docksides' and three Benelux trade marks in the name 'Sebago'.
Der var tale om 2 561 par sko, der var »made in Salvador« og købt hos et belgisk selskab, der specielt driver virksomhed med parallelimport.
Those trade marks are registered, inter alia, for shoes. Maison Dubois is the exclusive distributor in the Benelux of shoes bearing Sebago's trade marks.
Hele partiet blev solgt i løbet af sommeren 1996.
In the tenth issue of its 1996 brochure entitled 'La quinzaine Maxi-GB', announcing prices valid
Sebago og Maison Dubois bestrider ikke, at de af G-B Unie solgte sko var ægte varer. Men de har anført, at de ikke havde givet samtykke til salg af disse sko inden for Fællesskabet, og at G-B Unie
The Court finds, first, that the answer to the first three questions referred has already been given by the Court in Case C-355/96 Silhouette International Schmied v Hartlauer.
Det skal på dette punkt fastslås, at selv om svaret på dette spørgsmål ikke umiddelbart følger af ordlyden af direktivets artikel 7, stk. 1, står det
The Court held, in that case, that, according to the text of Article 7 of the Directive itself, rights conferred
dog fast, at de rettigheder, der er knyttet til varemærket, kun udtømmes for de eksemplarer af varen, der er markedsført på det i denne bestemmelse fastlagte område med indehaverens samtykke.
similar to those in respect of which exhaustion is claimed.
for dette område ikke udtømmer indehaverens ret til at modsætte sig indførsel af disse varer, der sker uden hans samtykke, og til dermed at kontrollere den første markedsføring inden for Fællesskabet (EØS efter ikrafttrædelsen af EØS-aftalen) af de varer, der er forsynet med mærket.
by the mark are exhausted only if the products have been put on the market in the Community (in the EEA since the EEA Agreement entered into force) and that the Directive does not leave it open to the Member States to provide in their domestic law for exhaustion of the rights conferred by the trade mark in respect of products put on the market in non-member countries.
Det bemærkes desuden, at fællesskabslovgiver ved vedtagelsen af direktivets artikel 7, der begrænser konsumption af den ret, mærket giver, til situationer, hvor de varer, der er forsynet med mærket, er blevet markedsført inden for Fællesskabet (EØS efter ikrafttrædelsen af EØS-aftalen), har betonet, at en markedsføring uden
Next, it should be noted that, by its last two questions, the national court is asking essentially whether there is consent within the meaning of Article 7 of the Directive where the trade-mark proprietor has consented to the marketing in the EEA of goods which are identical or similar to those in respect of which exhaustion is claimed or if, on the other hand, consent must relate to each individual item of the product in respect of which exhaustion is claimed.
»Artikel 7, stk 1, i Rådets første direktiv 89/104/EØF af 21. december 1988 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om varemærker, som ændret ved aftalen af 2. maj 1992 om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde, skal fortolkes således, at
Nevertheless, the rights conferred by the trade mark are exhausted only in respect of the individual items of the product which have been put on the market with the proprietor's consent in the territory there defined.
— der kun indtræder konsumption af de rettigheder, der er knyttet til varemærket, hvis varerne er blevet markedsført inden for Fællesskabet (inden for EØS efter ikrafttrædelsen af EØS-aftalen), og at den ikke giver medlemsstaterne mulighed for i deres nationale ret at foreskrive konsumption af de rettigheder, der er knyttet til varemærket, for varer, der er markedsført i tredjelande,
The proprietor may continue to prohibit the use of the mark in pursuance of the right conferred on him by the Directive in regard to individual items of that product which have been put on the market in that territory without his consent.
— samtykke i den forstand, hvori udtrykket er anvendt i dette direktivs artikel 7, stk 1, forudsætter, at samtykket skal gælde for hvert enkelt eksemplar af den vare, med hensyn til hvilken der påberåbes konsumption.«
Furthermore, in adopting Article 7 of the Directive, which limits exhaustion of the right conferred by the trade mark to cases where the goods bearing the mark have been put on the market in the Community (in the EEA since the EEA Agreement entered into force), the Community legislature has made it clear that putting such goods on the market outside that territory does not exhaust the proprietor's right to oppose the importation of those goods without his consent and thereby to control the initial marketing in the Community (in the EEA since the EEA Agreement entered into force) of goods bearing the mark.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet fFemte Afdeling) den 25. marts 1999.
That protection would be devoid of substance if, for there to be exhaustion within the meaning of Article 7, it were sufficient for the trade-mark proprietor to have consented to the putting on the market in that territory of goods which were identical or
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Rådets direktiv 93¡103/EF af 23. november 1993 om minimumsforskrifter for sikkerhed og sundhed under arbejdet om bord på fiskerfartøjer (trettende særdirektiv i henhold til direktiv 89/391/EØF)
'Article 7(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, as amended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that:
Præjudiciel — Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco —fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 52 og artikel 92 i forhold til regler i et område i en medlemsstat om skattemæssige foranstaltninger til støtte for investeringerne og til fremme af økonomisk virksomhed — skattemæssige foranstaltninger, der alene gælder for »lokale* virksomheder (men ikke for virksomheder i den øvrige del af den pågældende medlemsstat eller i andre medlemsstater)
— the rights conferred by the trade mark are exhausted only if the products have been put on the market in tine Community (in the European Economic Area since the Agreement on the European Economic Area entered into force) and that provision does not leave it open to the Member States to provide in their domestic law for exhaustion of the rights conferred by the trade mark in respect of products put on the market in non-member countries;
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Første Afdeling') den 1. iuli 1999.
— for there to be consent within the meaning of Article 7(1) of that directive, such consent must relate to each individual item of the product in respect of which exhaustion is pleaded.'
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Advocate General FG.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum1) den
Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Fifth Chamber on 25 March 1999.
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
He proposed that the questions be answered as follows:
Sag C-233/98 Hauptzollamt Neubrandenburg / Lensing & Brockhausen GmbH Traktatbrudssøgsmål - Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF af 25. februar 1992 om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed — opretholdelse af et særligt bidrag (beregnet pr. deciliter eller brøkdel af en deciliter), som opkræves af drikkevarer med et alkoholindhold på over 25% voL
'(1) National rules providing for exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark in respect of products put on the market outside the EEA under that mark by the proprietor or with its consent are contrary to Article 7(1) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, as amended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet ("Femte Afdeling") den 1. iuli 1999.
(2) Article 7(1) of the Directive must be interpreted as meaning that where goods have been marketed by the trade-mark owner or with his consent within the EEA, he is not thereby precluded from exercising his trade-mark rights to oppose the importation into the EEA of other identical or similar goods bearing his mark.'
10 6 2/87 om gennemførehesbestemmelser til og forenkling af proceduren for fællesskabsforsendelse — overtrædelse eller uregelmæssighed begået i forbindelse med en foranstaltning vedrørende ekstern fællesskabsforsendelse (TI) — toldkontoret på det sted, hvor overtrædelsen eller uregelmæssigheden er begået, og som det påhviler at opkræve importafgifterne — (fristen for) beviset for stedetfor overtrœaeL·en eller uregelmæssigheden
Joined Cases C400/97, C-401/97 and C402/97 Administración del Estado ν Juntas Generales de Guipúzcoa and Others of a Member State relating to fiscal measures to promote investment and stimulate economic activity — Fiscal measure aimed solely at 'local' undertakings (to the exclusion of those from the rest of the Member State concerned as well as those of other Member States
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tørste Afdeling') den 1. juli 1999.
Preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (High Court of Justice of the Basque Country) — Interpretation of Articles 52 and 92(1) of the EC Treaty - Legislation of a territory
Sag C-362/98 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
Advocate General A Saggio delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 1 July 1999.
merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag og artikel 3 i Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed, med hensyn til en kommunal afgift af drikkevarer (herunder alkoholholdige drikkevarer) samt konsumis, hvor beregningsgrundlaget er disse produkters salgspris —fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 92, stk 1, med hensyn til en ordning hvorefter direkte salg af vin er fritaget for afgiften
'Articles 43 and 87 of the EC Treaty must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude legislation of a territory within an Autonomous Community of a Member State, on urgent fiscal measures to aid investment and stimulate economic activity, which may benefit taxable persons who pay tax exclusively to the tax authorities for that territory or are resident there for tax purposes or who carry out most of the volume of their transactions there or who, being resident there for tax purposes, have, in the preceding tax year, carried out more than 25% of their total volume of transactions in the Autonomous Community, and which does not apply to other natural and legal persons resident in the State itself or in another Member State of the European Community.' amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 474/90 of 22 February 1990, in conjunction with Article lla(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1062/87 of 27 March 1987 on provisions for the implementation of the Community transit procedure and for certain simplifications of that procedure, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1429/90 of 29 May 1990, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the event of a failure to produce a consignment at the office of destination, the Member State of departure has jurisdiction to levy import taxes only where the period of three months laid down in tie second subparagraph of Article lla(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1062/87, as amended by Regulation No 1429/90, has previously been set for the principal and he has not furnished the proof required by that provision.
Generaladvokat A Saggio fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling') den 1. juli 1999.
Case C-233/98 Hauptzollamt Neubrandenburg Lensing & Brockhausen GmbH The third subparagraph of Article 36(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 222/77, as amended by Regulation No 474/90, must be interpreted as meaning that it is not to be applied in a case in which a customs office of the Member State of departure has levied taxes due in respect of goods cleared for the transit procedure but has not set a time limit for the principal to furnish the proof of the offence or irregularity in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article lla(2) of Regulation No 1062/87, as amended by Regulation No 1429/90.'
Sag C-164/98 Ρ DIR International Kommissionen for Fællesskaber
Case C-362/98 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
Appel af dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Første Afdeling) den 19. februar 1998 i sag T85/95 — annullation af afgørelser truffet af European Film Distribution Office (EFDO) — som meddelt ved skriveher af 12. september 1994 — om at udsætte behandlingen af ansøgninger, som var indgivet af dattersehkaber til United International Pictures om finansiel støtte inden for rammerne af MEDIA-programmet til distribution af bestemte film, med henblik på at afvente Kommissionens beslutning om en ansøgning om fornyelse af en fritagelse, der var meddelt United Pictures International i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 85, stk 1 — annullation af Kommissionens foranstaltning ved hvilken den gav EFDO pålæg om at træffe af disse afgørelser
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, Council Directive 93/103/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for work on board fishing vesseh (thirteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)
Generaladvokat S. Alber fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 1. juli 1999.
'(1) The first subparagraph of Article 36(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 222/77 of 13 December 1976 on Community transit, as
direktiv 90/220/EØF om udsætning i miljøet af genetisk modificerede organismer
Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 1 July 1999.
Præjudiciel — Pretura circondariale di Torino -offentlig ansættelse — fortolkning af artikel 79 i ansættelsesvilkårene for de øvrige ansatte -lokalt ansatte — undladelse af at forny en arbejdsaftale — vedtægtens rækkevidde -anvendelse af national lovgivning
Preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Administrative Court), Vienna — Interpretation of Article 33(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive (77/388/EEC) and Article 3 of Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding movement and monitoring of such products in relation to a municipal levy on drinks (including alcoholic drinks) and ice creams, assessed on the basis of the sale price of those products.
Sag C-122/99 P, C-125/99 Ρ D/Rådet
(2) order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.'
Appel af dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans (Anden Afdeling) den 28. januar 1999 i sag T264/97, D. mod Rådet, hvorved Retten frifandt Rådet i forbindelse med en påstand om annullation af Rådets afgørelse, hvorved sagsøgeren fik afslag på tildeling af husstandstillæg for sin partner — »registrerat partnerskap« jf. den svenske lov 1994:1117
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Council Directive 92/12/CEE of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements f or products subject to excise duty and on the holding movement and monitoring of such products - Keeping in force a special contribution calculated by decilitre or fraction thereof, affecting beverages with an alcohol content exceeding 25% vol
Traktatbrudssøgsmål—manglende gennemførelse inden for den fastsatte frist af Europa-Parlamentet og Rådets direktiv 94/62/EF af 20. december 1994 om emballage og emballageaffald
Article 33(1) of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes -Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (77/388/EEC) must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the maintenance in force of a levy on the supply for consideration of ice cream, including fruits processed therein or added thereto, and beverages, in each case including the containers and accessories sold therewith, the rate of such levy being 10% of the consideration in the case of ice cream and alcoholic beverages and 5% of the consideration in the case of non-alcoholic beverages.
Præjudiciel—Sozialgericht Münster—fortolkning af fællesskabsretten (artikel 3 og 10 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere og familiemedlemmer der flytter inden for Fællesskabet) i forbindelse med en national lovgivning, hvori der fastsættes mindstegrænser for faktisk udbetaling af skyldige socialydelser - sondring mellem indlands- og udlandsbetalinger — sondring efter de gennemsnitlige omkostninger ved transaktionen
Article 3(2) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes the maintenance in force of a levy such as described in Question 1.
Nederlandene / Kommissionen anerkendelse af, forskriftsmæssigt
The second sentence of Article 3(3) of the same directive does not preclude the maintenance in force of that levy in so far as it affects non-alcoholic beverages and ice cream.
Delvis annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 3. februar 1999 om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter, som de har afholdt for Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget, Garantisektionen, i 1995 — finansiel korrektion vedrørende støtte til skummetmælk med henblik på fremstilling af kasein og kaseinater -Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2921/90 af 10. oktober 1990
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 19 February 1998 in Joined Cases T-369/94 and T-85/95 DIR International Film and Others v Commission — Annulment of the decisions of the European Film Distribution Office ('EFDO') notified on 12 September 1994, to leave the procedure concerning applications by subsidiaries of United International Pictures for EFDO financial aid under the MEDIA programme for the distribution of certain films in suspense, pending the Commission's decision on the application for renewal of the exemption granted to United International Pictures under Article 85(1) of the EC Treaty —Annulment of the act of the Commission whereby it instructed the EFDO to take those decisions
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — manglende fuldstændig gennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 84/360/EØF af 28. juni 1984 om bekæmpelse af luftforurening fra industrianlæg — Den Portugisiske Republik har ikke foreskrevet en forpligtelse til at indhente forudgående godkendelse med hensyn til (a) anlæg for kulforgasning og -likvefaktion, og (b) anlæg til fremstilling af glasfibre eller mineraluldsfibre
Preliminary ruling — Tribunale Amminstrativo Regionale (RegionalAdministrative Court), Emilia-Romagna — Interpretation of Article 6 of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts — Scope — National provisions which, without recourse to procedures for the award of public contracts laid down by the directive, entrust the management of the heating installations in certain municipal buildings to a consortium of municipalities
Præjudiciel - Bundessozialgericht - fortolkning af fællesskabsretten — EF-traktatens artikel 48 og artikel 3, stk. 1, og bilag VI, afsnit C, punkt 19, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet ,som indsat ved forordning (EØF) nr. 2195/91) af 25. juni 1991 med henblik på en national lovgivning om social sikring, hvorefter en periode med pasning af et barn i den pågældende medlemsstat betragtes som en periode, hvorunder der er betalt bidrag til alderdomsforsikringen — situationen for en grænsearbejder (der har bopæl i en medlemsstat, efter hvis lovgivning han ikke har en tilsvarende ret, fordi han ikke arbejder i bopælsstaten)
'Council Directive 93/36 EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts requires compliance with the procedure it organises where a written contract for consideration for the supply of products is concluded, regardless of the fact that that contract is concluded between entities which constitute contracting authorities.'
Sag C-133/99
Case C-164/98 Ρ
Traktatbrudssøgsmål — tilsidesættelse af EF-traktatens artikel 59 og ukorrekt gennemførelse af artikel 21, 22 og 25 i Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØFaf 3. oktober 1989 om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tvradiospredningsvirksomhed (EFT L 298, s. 23).
Case C-121/99 Commission ν Greece the light of national legislation providing for thresholds for the actual payment of social benefits owing — Differentiation according to the domestic or foreign destination of the payment -Differentiation according to the actual average cost of the transaction