natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolen bemærkede hertil, at selv om High Court havde forelagt de præjudicielle spørgsmål som led i sagen om nedlæggelse af forbud, havde Supreme Court udtrykkeligt godkendt, at kendelsen herom i givet fald kunne ændres i lyset af Domstolens præjudicielle udtalelse. Såfremt spørgsmålene var stillet som et led i hovedsagen, skulle High Court træffe realitetsafgørelse i denne.
It is not contrary to Community law for a Member State in which medical termination of pregnancy is forbidden to prohibit students associ ati ons from distributing i riformati on about the identity and location of clinics in another Member State where voluntary termination of pregnancy is lawfully carried out and the means of communicating with those clinics, where the clinics in question have no involvement in the distribution of the said information.
I begge tilfælde ville den forelæggende ret således træffe en afgørelse, hvor Domstolens præjudicielle afgørelse ville blive lagt til grund.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 11 June 1991.
SPUC havde gjort gældende, at sagen ikke indeholdt spørgsmål om fællesskabsretten, hvorfor Domstolen burde afvise at besvare de forelagte spørgsmål.
"I therefore propose that the Court should answer the questions put by the national court in the following terms:
Domstolen bemærkede hertil, at de af SPUC påberåbte omstændigheder vedrørte realiteten 1 de spørgsmål, som den forelæggende ret havde stillet. Derfor var disse omstændigheder uden betydning ved vurderingen af Domstolens kompetence til at træffe en præjudiciel afgørelse.
The Treaty provisions with regard to the freedom to provide services do not prevent a Member State where the protection of unborn life is recognized in the Constitution and in Its legislation as a fundamental principle from imposing a general prohibition, applying to everyone regardless of their nationality or place of establishment, on the provision of assistance to pregnant women, regardless of their nationality, with a view to the termination of their pregnancy, more specifically through the distribution of information as to the identity and location of and method of communication with clinics located in another Member State where abortions are carried out, even though the services of medical termination of pregnancy and the information relating thereto are provided in accordance with the law in force in that second Member State."
Domsolen bemærkede, at afbrydelse af svangerskab, der lovligt finder sted 1 flere medlemsstater, er en lægelig handling, der normalt ydes mod betaling, og som kan udføres inden for rammerne af et liberalt erhverv.
Staff Case (Invalidity Pension - Occupational illness) (Second Chamber)
Domstolen bemærkede hertil, at moralske argumenter uanset deres værdi som sådan ikke kunne påvirke besvarelsen af det første spørgsmål. Det var nemlig ikke Domstolens opgave at sætte sin vurdering deraf 1 stedet for lovgivers vurdering i de medlemsstater, hvor den pågældende handling lovligt kan udføres.
Essentially, the Parliament argued that the contested regulation was wrongly based on Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty whereas the appropriate legal basis would have been Article 100 A of the EEC Treaty, if necessary in conjunction wityh Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty.
Andet og tredje spørgsmål
The Court held as follows:
De oplysninger, som de præjudicielle spørgsmål omhandler, udbredes Ikke på vegne af en erhvervsdrivende 1 en anden medlemsstat.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 26 June 1991
For det andet bemærkede Domstolen, at artikel 62, hvorefter medlemsstaterne ikke må Indføre nye begrænsninger i den frihed til udveksling af tjenesteydelser, der faktisk er opnået ved Traktatens ikrafttræden, Ikke kunne anvendes som hjemmel til at forbyde restriktioner, der Ikke henhører under nævnte bestemmelses anvendelsesområde.
Whilst it is true that the (urgent) measures adopted on the basis of that regulation will have a (temporary) impact on the marketing of those products, the fact remains that, in view of the importance of pursuing a coherent and effective policy for the protection of health, that cannot prevent Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty from constituting the legal basis of such a regulation.
For det tredje havde sagsøgte 1 hovedsagen anført, at de grundlæggende ret tigheder, navnlig ytringsfriheden og Informationsfriheden, som de navnlig fremgår af artikel 10, stk. 1, i Den Europæiske Konvention om Menneskerettigheder, var til hinder for, at der blev nedlagt et forbud som omhandlet i hovedsagen.
In my opinion, it is impossible to accept the arguments put forward by the Parliament to the effect that Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty does not form such a legal basis, because they interpret the policy of health protection referred to in Article 30 et seq. of the EAEC Treaty in an unduly restrictive manner. I propose therefore that the Court dismiss the Parliament's application.
Domstolen bemærkede, at når en national lovgivning omfattes af fællesskabsretten, skal Domstolen ved besvarelsen af præjudicielle spørgsmål forsyne den nationale ret med alle de fortolkningsbidrag, som gør det muligt for den nationale ret at vurdere den pågældende lovgivnings forenelighed med de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder, som Domstolen skal beskytte, således som de navnlig fremgår af Den Europæiske Konvention om Menneskerettigheder. Derimod har Domstolen ikke denne kompetence med hensyn til en national lovgivning, som ikke omfattes af fællesskabsretten.
Costs: Since the Council failed in its plea concerning admissibility, which was also an important factor in the present case, I propose that, pursuant to Article 69(3) of the Rules of Procedure, that the Court order the European Parliament and the Council each to bear their own costs.
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
Case C-246/89 Commission of the European Communities ν United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Lægelig afbrydelse af svangerskab, udført i overensstemmelse med lovgivningen i den stat, hvor den foretages, er en tjenesteydelse som omhandlet i EØF-Traktatens artikel 60.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 4 August 1989, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that, by imposing the nationality requirements enshrined in Sections 13 and 14 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1988 Act"), the United Kingdom had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7, 52 and 221 of the EEC Treaty.
­ 33 ­ svangerskabsafbrydelse lovligt kan foretages, når de pågældende klinikker på ingen måde er involveret 1 udbredelsen af de nævn­te oplysninger."
The United Kingdom is ordered to pay the Commission's costs, including those of the proceedings for interim measures, and those of the Kingdom of Spain;
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse 1 rets­mødet den 11. iunj 1991.
Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 13 March 1991
Hans forslag lød:
He concluded:
"Jeg skal derfor foreslå Domstolen at besvare de spørgsmål, som den natio­nale ret har forelagt således:
"It follows from those answers that the Commission's action against the United Kingdom for failure to fulfil its obligations is well founded and hence the Court should declare in Case C-246/89 that, by imposing the nationality requirements enshrined in sections 13 and 14 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 52 and 221 of the EEC Treaty.
Sagsøgte frifindes.
Staff Case (Promotion - Discrimination of ground of nationality) (Fifth Chamber)
Europa-Parlamentet betaler sagens omkostninger, herunder i ntervenienternes."
Staff Case (Official's individual file - Documents missing) (Fifth Chamber)
Generaladvokat Walter Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Qomstolens plenum) den 26. iuni 1991.
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 17 September 1991
Han sammenfattede sit forslag således:
"I propose the following answer:
"På grundlag af gennemgangen af den anfægtede forordnings formål og indhold er det min opfattelse, at forordningen navnlig vedrører sundhedsbeskyttelsen mod de farer, der er forbundet med produkter, der har været udsat for en alvorlig radioaktiv kontaminering. Selv om de (haste)-foranstaltninger, der træffes 1 henhold til forordningen, (midlertidigt) vil have betydning for markedsføringen af sådanne produkter, må hensynet til en sammenhængende og effektiv sundhedsbeskyttelsespolitik imidlertid føre til, at Euratom-Traktatens artikel 31 er rette hjemmel for en sådan forordning.
Articles 77 and 79 of Council Regulation No. 1408/71 of 14 June 1971, in the version contained in Annex I to Council Regulation No. 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, do not preclude the application, in favour of a pensioner residing in another Member State whose entitlement to a pension was determined by the competent institution in that Member State having regard to insurance periods completed In other Member States, of the provisions of the said State which provide for the pensioner entitlement to receive family benefits for a dependent spouse as well."
Sag C-246/89 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber m.fl. mod Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland m.fl.
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Articles 73 and 75 of Regulation No. 1408/71 - Refusal to grant family benefits to pre­retirement workers not residing within national territory.
4.10.1991 "Fiskeri - registrering af fartøjer - nationalitetsbetingelse" (Domstolens plenum)
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 17 September 1991
Domstolen udtalte og bestemte:
"Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court dismiss the application and order the Commission to pay the costs."
Det Forenede Kongerige bærer Kommissionens omkostninger, herunder omkostningerne i sagen om foreløbige forholdsregler, samt Kongeriget Spaniens omkostninger.
Bachman ν Belgian State and C-300/90 Commission of the European Communities ν Kingdom of Belgium
Irland bærer sine egne omkostninger, herunder omkostningerne 1 sagen om foreløbige forholdsregler."
Preliminary ruling - Belgian Court of Cassation - Interpretation of Article 48, first paragraph of Article 59, Articles 67 and 106 of the EEC Treaty in relation to national income tax legislation which makes the deductibility of contributions to sickness and invalidity or old age and life assurance subject to the condition that such contributions are paid in the Member State concerned.
Generaladvokat Jean Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 13. marts 1991.
Mr Advocate General Jean Mischo delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 17 September 1991.
"Heraf følger, at der må gives Kommissionen medhold i traktatbrudssagen, og at det derfor i sag C-246/89 må fastslås, at Det Forenede Kongerige ikke har overholdt de forpligtelser, der påhviler det i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikler 52 og 221, idet det har indført nationalitetsbetingelserne i Sections 13 og 14 i Merchant Shipping Aet 1988.
Articles 48 and 59 of the EEC Treaty must be interpreted as precluding tax legislation of a Member State which provides that contributions to sickness and Invalidity insurance or old age and life assurance schemes are not deductible from a worker's taxable income unless they are paid to an insurance undertaking established within the territory of that Member State.
Det Forenede Kongerige bør bære alle omkostningerne i sag C-246/89, herunder de omkostninger, der er afholdt af Kongeriget Spanien, som har interveneret til støtte for Det Forenede Kongeriges påstande."
It follows from that answer that the action for failure to fulfil obligations brought by the Commission is well founded and accordingly the Court should hold as follows In Case C-300/90:
Sag Τ­36/89 NIjaan mod Kommissionen
The Court of Cassation should therefore not apply those provisions.
Tjenestemandssag Ansvar uden for kontrakt ­ pligt til at give oplysninger (Fjerde Afdeling)
As regards Case C-300/90, I propose that the Court order each of the parties to bear its own costs since in my opinion neither was wholly right or wholly wrong."
25.9.1991 Tjenestemandssag Pension ­ undersøgelse hvert femte år af justeringskoefficienterne (Fjerde Afdeling)
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to implement Council Directive 82/470/EEC on measures to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services in respect of activities of self-employed persons in certain services incidental to transport and travel agencies (ISIC Group 718) and in storage and warehousing (ISIC Group 720).
25.9.1991 Tjenestemandssag Forfremmelse ­ forskelsbehandling på grundlag af nationalitet (Femte Afdeling)
Mr Advocate General Carl Otto Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991
Artiklerne 77 og 79 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971, som affattet 1 bilag I til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2001/83 af 2. juni 1983, er Ikke til hinder for, at der over for en pensionist, som har bopæl i en anden medlemsstat, og hvis pension er fastsat af den kompetente Insti­tution i den pågældende medlemsstat på grundlag af forsikringsperioder, der er tilbagelagt i andre medlemsstater, anvendes den pågældende stats bestem­melser, hvorefter en pensionist har ret til familieydelser også for den ægtefælle, han forsørger."
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty - Infringement of Council Directives 75/442/EEC on waste and 84/631/EEC on the supervision and control within the European Community of the transfrontier shipment of hazardous waste.
Sag C­198/90 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Kongeriget Nederlandene
Mr Advocate General F. G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991
"På baggrund af ovennævnte bemærkninger skal jeg foreslå, at sagsøgte frifindes, og at Kommissionen tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger."
Declare that by prohibiting the storage, tipping or dumping in Wal Ioni a of waste from other Member States and, in so far as waste originating in other Member States is concerned, from Belgian regions other than Wallonia, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 84/631/EEC and Article 30 of the EEC Treaty;
Sagerne C-204/90 H.-M. Bachmann mod den belgiske stat og C-300/90 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Kongeriget Belgien
Case C-57/90 Commission of the European Communities ν French Republic
Præjudiciel - Belgiens Cour de cassation - fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 48, artikel 59, stk. 1, artikel 67 og artikel 106 1 forhold til en medlemsstats indkomstskatteregler, hvorefter præmier til syge- og invalideforsikring eller til alderspensions- og livsforsikring kun kan fradrages, såfremt de er indbetalt i den pågældende medlemsstat.
Failure of a State to fulfil obligations - Articles 13(1) and 33 of Council Regulation No. 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community - Imposition of a health insurance tax on persons in receipt of supplementary pensions and early retirement benefits who reside in a Member State other than France.
Generaladvokat Jean Mishco fremsatte forslag til afgørelse 1 retsmødet den 17. september 1991.
Mr Advocate General Carl Otto Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991
Forslaget lød:
He concluded:
N Herefter skal jeg sammenfattende foreslå Domstolen, at den i sag C-204/90 besvarer det præjudicielle spørgsmål således:
"Therefore, summarizing the foregoing reasoning, I conclude that the Commission's application is well founded and that the Court of Justice should therefore find that, by imposing a health insurance tax on persons in receipt of supplementary pensions and early retirement benefits who reside in a Member State other than France, for whom the risks of illness and maternity are not covered by the French scheme, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Regulation No. 1408/71. Accordingly, the defendant should also be ordered to pay the costs".
EØF-Traktatens artikler 48 og 59 skal fortolkes således, at de afskærer en medlemsstat fra at fastsætte skatteregler, hvorefter præmier til syge- og invalideforsikringer eller til alderspensions- og livsforsikringer kun kan fradrages 1 en arbejdstagers skattepligtige indkomst, hvis præmierne er indbetalt til et forsikringsselskab, der er etableret på denne medlemsstats område.
Failure of the State to fulfil obligations - Failure to notify the Commission of the national legal measures adopted to comply with Council Directive 87/53/EEC amending Directive 83/643/EEC concerning the facilitation of physical inspections and administrative formalities for the transport of goods between Member States.
Det følger af dette svar, at Kommissionens traktatbrudssøgsmål er begrundet, og at Domstolen derfor 1 sag C-300/90 bør fastslå:
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 19 September 1991
Man kan herefter rejse spørgsmål om, hvilke konsekvenser Belgiens Cour de cassation bør drage af de foregående betragtninger, for så vidt angår løsningen af tvisten mellem Bachmann og den belgiske stat.
"Accordingly, I propose that the Court uphold the Commission's action in its entirety, except with regard to the new Articles 5(1)(a), second indent, and 8(2) of Directive 83/643/EEC, and order the Italian Government to pay the costs."
Cour de cassation bør derfor fastslå, at bestemmelserne ikke finder anvendelse.
Preliminary ruling - Tribunale di Genova - Interprétâtioon of Articles 7, 30, 85, 86 and 91 of the EEC Treaty - National legislation granting
Sag C-306/89 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Hellenske Republik
"In view of the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court reply as follows to the questions submitted for a preliminary ruling: l.a)
Traktatbrud - undladelse af, inden for den fastsatte frist, at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 82/470/EØF om foranstaltninger til fremme af den faktiske udøvelse af etableringsfriheden og den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser ved selvstændig virksomhed inden for visse hjælpeerhverv i forbindelse med transport og rejsebureauvirksomhed (ISIC-gruppe 718) og inden for pakhus- og oplagringsvirksomhed (ISIC-gruppe 720).
National legislation which imposes on the undertakings referred to In Article 90(1), which are entrusted with the conduct or organization of port operations, the obligation to have recourse, for such operations, to port workers of the nationality of the Member State concerned, is incompatible with the combined provisions of Article 90(1) and Article 7, Article 48 or Articles 52 and 59 of the EEC Treaty and cannot be justified either on grounds of public policy or public security, or as posts in the public administration or involving the exercise of public authority.
Forslaget lød:
The abovementioned provisions of the Treaty have direct effect.
Det fastslås, at Den Hellenske Republik har tilsidesat sine forplig telser efter EØF-Traktaten, idet den ikke inden for den fastsatte frist ved lov eller administrativt har truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger til gennemførelse af Rådets direktiv 82/470/EØF af 29. juni 1982 om foranstaltninger til fremme af den faktiske udøvelse af etableringsfriheden og den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser ved selvstændig virksomhed inden for visse hjælpeerhverv 1 forbindelse med transport og rejsebureauvirksomhed (ISIC-gruppe 718) og inden for pakhus- og oplagringsvirksomhed (ISIC-gruppe 720).
National legislation which encourages, compels or inevitably leads an undertaking referred to in Article 90(1) to abuse a dominant position held by it in a substantial part of the Common Market or to engage with another undertaking in a concerted practice, abuse or practice consisting, in the case of port operations which may or may not be requested and on occasion may not even be carried out, in applying unfair prices or other conditions or restricting outlets or technical developments to the detriment of users, or in applying unequal conditions to equivalent services to the detriment of other parties to commercial contracts, is incompatible with the combined provisions of Article 90(1) and Article 86 or Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. Together with those provisions, Article 90(1) has direct effect.
Traktatbrud - manglende gennemførelse i national ret af Rådets direktiv 80/155/EØF om samordning af de administrativt eller ved lov fastsatte bestemmelser om adgang til og udøvelse af virksomhed som jordemoder.
In the event of the national court reaching a different conclusion, it is for the national undertakings concerned to prove to the national court, if they intend to rely on the derogation provided for in Article 90(2), the exact nature of the requirements of general interest which compel them to act in breach of Articles 7, 85 and 86 of the EEC Treaty. It is only where the latter element can also be
Generaladvokat Carl Otto Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 19. september 1991.
- 40 - proved to the national court and it can also be proved, if necessary after contact with the Commission, that the condition referred to in the last sentence of Article 90(2) is also fulfilled, that national legislation, of the kind described above in paragraph 1(a) and (b), is nevertheless not contrary to Article 90(1) combined with any of the Treaty provisions mentioned above in paragraph 1(a) and (b)."
Traktatbrud - EØF-Traktatens artikler 30 og 36 - tilsidesættelse af Rådets direktiver 75/442/EØF om affald og 84/631/EØF om overvågning af og kontrol inden for Fællesskabet med grænseoverskridende over førsel af farligt affald.
Failure of a State to fulfil its obligations - Infringement of Articles 13(1) and 33 of Council Regulation No. 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community - Deduction of sickness insurance contributions from benefits taking the place of legally prescribed old age, retirement, superannuation or survivors' pensions of Community nationals residing in another Member State under whose legislation they are entitled to sickness benefits.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmodet (Domstolens plenum) den 19. september 1991.
Mr Advocate General Carl Otto Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the full Court on 19 September 1991
"Jeg skal herefter foreslå Domstolen
In this case too, the defendant should be ordered to pay the costs."
at tilpligte Kongeriget Belgien at betale sagens omkostninger."
"In the light of the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court uphold the application and order the Commission to pay the costs."
Sag C-57/90 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber mod Den Franske Republik
Case C-185/90-Ρ Commission ν Gill
Generaladvokat Carl Otto Lenz fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 19. september 1991.
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 6 April 1990 in Case T-43/89 on the application of Article 78 of the staff regulations of officials - Incapacity deriving from an occupational illness.