natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der sås ikke at være nogen bestem­melse i den internationale privatret, som kunne medføre, at en sådan indkaldelse var ugyldig. For så vidt appellanten derimod ville anfægte, at forkyndelsen var forskrifts­mæssig i artikel 27, nr. 2's forstand, kunne der ikke tages hensyn dertil, eftersom denne indsigelse ikke var fremsat i den foreskrevne processuelle form.
There was no apparent provision of private international law upon the basis of which such a summons would require to be regarded as ineffective.
Følgelig opfordrede retten parterne til at fremlægge bestemmelserne i nederlandsk ret om retsmidler inden for civilprocessen, især om retsmidlerne mod udeblivelsesdomme, samt alle dokumenter, hvoraf det kunne udledes, om det franske selskab havde anvendt et af disse retsmidler.
(continued 1) gard, account had been taken of the fact that the defendant had had to have the state­ment of claim and summons translated before it had been able to arrange for its defence by instructing an Italian lawyer as well as one practising in the State in which the judg­ment was given.
Fuldbyrdelse — udeblivelsesdom — hindringer for fuldbyrdelse (artikel 34, stk. 2) —for­skriftsmæssig og rettidig forkyndelse eller meddelelse af det indledende processkrift i sagen (artikel 27, nr. 2) — fremsendelse af en uoversat indkaldelse og stævning gennem postvæ­senet — prøvelse af forskriftsmæssigheden — rettidigheden i forholdet Belgien/Tyskland
Enforcement — Grounds for refusal (second paragraph of Article 34) — Judgment in de­fault — Defendant not duly served in sufficient time with the document instituting proceed­ings — Establishment by the court addressed of the existence of appeal procedures in the original State and of the effective use thereof by the defendant in default of appearance
Appelretten afslog at erklære en belgisk udeblivelsesdom eksigibel i Forbundsrepublik­ken Tyskland med den begrundelse, at udlevering af en indkaldelse og stævning (dag­vaarding), der var affattet på nederlandsk og fremsendt i anbefalet brev til den tyske re­kvisitus tretten dage før retsmødet, ikke kunne anses for rettidig forkyndelse i konventio­nens artikel 27, nr. 2's forstand.
A court of first instance in Rotterdam had given a judgment in default ordering a French company to pay a sum of money to a company which had its registered office and head­quarters in London and other offices in Rotterdam.
Stævnevarslet var hverken overholdt efter tysk eller bel­gisk procesret.
The President of the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Pontoise, granted an order for the enforcement of that judgment in France.
Selv om disse varsler kun var udgangspunkter, og den omstændighed, at de ikke var overholdt, ikke i ethvert tilfælde burde føre til, at forkyndelsen blev anset for mangelfuld i henhold til artikel 27, nr. 2, ville rekvisitus dog ikke have været i stand til at varetage sine interesser i løbet af tretten dage.
The French company appealed against that order to the Cour d'Appel, Paris, pursuant to Article 36 of the Convention, on the ground that, contrary to Article 27 (2), the document instituting the proceedings had not been served on it in sufficient time to enable it to arrange for its defence, since it had received notice of the writ only six days before judgment was given.
Rekvisitus måtte først have ladet foretage en oversættelse af dokumentet, hvilket imidlertid ingenlunde ville have været tilstrække­ligt til at forstå det. En tysker, som ikke var fortrolig med belgisk ret, ville — især på grund af de historiske betingede udtryk og vendinger, der var anvendt i indkaldelsen og stævningen — ikke uden videre have kunnet forstå, at der var tale om et indledende pro­cesskrift i sagen, som der skulle reageres på.
The Cour d'Appel held that the provisions of Article 27 (2), which were laid down for the benefit of the defendant, are complied with irrespective of the date on which the de­fendant receives notice of the document instituting the proceedings, when some form of appeal is available to the defendant which has the effect of setting aside the decision giv­en in default, thus enabling the defendant to present a full defence before the foreign court whose function is to re­hear the case completely.
En tysk part måtte efter modtagelsen af et så­dant dokument i det mindste have lejlighed til at skaffe sig klarhed over dokumentets be­tydning og formål ved at søge bistand hos en sagkyndig.
The court therefore considered it necessary to inquire what forms of appeal were available to the French company under Netherlands procedural law and whether it had availed itself of some form of appeal.
Efter at have indhentet en over­sættelse og de nødvendige forklaringer måtte rekvisitus via en tysk advokat engagere en
Consequently, it invited the parties to produce to the court the provisions of Nether­lands law on appeal procedures in civil matters, in particular procedures for having judgments in default set aside, and any documents which might enable the court to ascer­tain whether or not the French company had availed itself of such a procedure.
Kurator i et tysk selskabs konkursbo havde udvirket, at den tyske ret på selskabets hjem­sted udstedte et betalingspålæg over for et fransk selskab for en fordring hidrørende fra levering af varer.
He had first of all had to obtain a translation of the documents, which had not however sufficed to render them intelligible.
Da skyldneren ikke rejste indsigelse, blev betalingspålægget, der var forkyndt for denne på forskriftsmæssig måde, erklæret for eksigibelt ved et fuldbyrdel­sesdekret afsagt af samme ret; det fik retskraft efter udløbet af fristen for at begære gen­optagelse.
A German who was not familiar with Belgian law could not have deduced from the dagvaarding, in particular because of its archaic lan­guage, that it constituted a document instituting legal proceedings and necessitating some form of response.
Efter at den eneste deltager i det selskab, der stod som kreditor, var død, be­talte hans arvinger fordringerne.
After receipt of such a document a German party must at least be given an opportunity to satisfy himself of its meaning and purpose by employing the services of an expert.
Derefter blev konkursboet sluttet, og aktiverne i selska­bet, der var opløst i forbindelse med konkursen, blev fordelt mellem afdødes arvinger, herunder også fordringen mod det franske selskab, for hvem overdragelsen blev for­kyndt på behørig vis.
After obtaining the translation and the necessary elucidation the defendant would have needed to engage and instruct a Belgian lawyer via a German law­yer. For all those steps a period of 13 days was too short.
Efter at arvingerne havde fået deres navne indført i fuldbyrdelses­påtegningen på betalingspålægget — som oprindelig var udstedt af den tyske ret til for­del for det konkursramte selskab — indgav de begæring til præsidenten for Tribunal de grande instance i den retskreds, hvor skyldneren havde sit hjemsted, om at det tyske fuld­byrdelsesdekret måtte blive erklæret eksigibelt i Frankrig.
Furthermore, the writ and summons to appear had not been properly served since the Federal Republic of Germany had objected to the possibility of postal service provided for in Article 6 of the Hague Convention of 1 March 1954 on Civil Procedure, which was applicable in the present case.
Cour d'appel forkastede den første del af anbringendet, som gik ud på, at den »Mahn­verfahren« (forenklet procesmåde i inkassosager), der var gennemført ved den tyske ret, havde været mangelfuld, og udtalte, at de betingelser, der er opstillet i konventionens ar­tikler 27, nr. 2, og 47, nr. 1, var opfyldt.
The liquidator of a German company which was in the course of being wound up by the court had obtained from the German court at the place where the company had its regis­tered office an order requiring a French company to pay for goods supplied.
For det første indebar forkyndelsen af betalings­pålægget for skyldnerens administrerende direktør, uden at der blev rejst indsigelse inden for den i loven fastsatte frist, en forskriftsmæssig forkyndelse af det indledende processkrift i sagen for den udeblevne skyldner, og den fandt sted i så god tid, at denne kunne have varetaget sine interesser under sagen, jfr. konventionens artikel 27, nr. 2; for­kyndelsen af betalingspålægget træder nemlig i stedet for en indkaldelse, da den indle­der en kontradiktorisk sagsbehandling, hvis der rejses indsigelse.
No objec­tion was lodged and the order for payment, having been duly served on the French com­pany, was declared enforceable in an enforcement order granted by the same court; it be­came final after service of the enforcement order and expiry of the period allowed for an appeal.
For det andet var også fuldbyrdelsesdekretet, for hvilket der var blevet fremsat begæring om tillæggelse af ekse­quatur, forskriftsmæssigt forkyndt i henhold til artikel 47, nr. 1, uden at der var rejst ind­sigelse inden for den fastsatte frist.
After the death of the sole member of the German company the persons benefi­cially entitled to his estate discharged the company's liabilities, thus terminating the in­solvency proceedings, and the assets of the wound-up company were distributed amongst the beneficiaries, including the claim against the French company, which was duly notified of the assignment of the debt.
Retten forkastede også den anden del af anbringendet, hvorefter § 688 i den tyske Zivil­prozessordnung skulle udelukke anvendelsen af den forenklede procesmåde i inkassosa­ger i internationale retsforhold.
The beneficiaries arranged for the transfer in­to their names of the enforcement order originally appended by the German court to the order for payment issued in favour of the insolvent company and applied to the Presi­dent of the Tribunal de Grande Instance, at the place where the French company had its registered office, for enforcement of the German order.
Retten i fuldbyrdelsesstaten kunne nemlig ikke foretage en prøvelse af, om den udenlandske procedure opfyldte forskrifterne i det pågældende lands ret, ud over, om de betingelser, der var opstillet i artiklerne 27, nr. 2, og 47, nr. 1, var opfyldt.
The Cour d'Appel dismissed the appeal which the French company lodged, pursuant to Article 36 of the Convention, against the order authorizing enforcement.
Cour d'appel forkastede endelig skyldnerens anbringende om, at det tyske betalingspå­læg stred mod grundlæggende retsprincipper, fordi det var udstedt inden for rammerne af en forenklet procesmåde, der var ensidig og ikke­kontradiktorisk, uden at skyldneren havde fået lejlighed til at varetage sine interesser, og uden at der var angivet en begrun­delse.
The Cour d'Appel observed in limine that the interested parties who were able under Ar­ticle 31 of the Convention to apply for an order for enforcement included the judgment creditor's assigns or persons subrogated to the claim in question and that in this case the beneficiaries had proved that they were acting in that capacity by producing a document evidencing their legal succession to the rights of the deceased and referring to an authen­tic instrument of assignment executed with the participation of the company's liquida­tor.
Også i fransk ret fandtes der en lignende procesmåde, som i begyndelsen var ensi­dig, og det kunne ikke have betydning, at der var forskelle i de retstekniske enkeltheder.
The French company argued that the Convention was inapplicable on the ground that the disputed debt was included in insolvency proceedings instituted against the German company.
Desuden var det ifølge fransk procesret kun afgørelser, der blev truffet efter begæring om genoptagelse, der skulle begrundes, og under alle omstændigheder kunne en mang­lende begrundelse i en udenlandsk dom ikke i sig selv være til hinder for, at dommen
That argument was rejected on the ground that the exclusion of insolvency from the scope of the Convention applied only to disputes deriving directly from the in­solvency and not to the proceedings instituted in the present case, which sought to recov­er a debt in respect of goods supplied and so constituted an ordinary legal action.
Cour de cassation stadfæstede denne afgørelse ved dom af 10. marts 1981 (Revue cri­tique de droit international privé 1981, s. 553).
The Cour d'Appel dismissed the first part of the submission based on the alleged irregu­larity of the summary procedure followed in the German courts for the recovery of the debt; it held that the conditions laid down in Articles 27 (2) and 47 (1) of the Convention were satisfied.
Den tiltrådte Cour d'appel's udtalelse om, at der ifølge konventionen ikke skal foretages en prøvelse af forskriftsmæssigheden af den procedure, der er fulgt i udlandet, ud over, om betingelserne i artikel 27, nr. 2, og artikel 47, nr. 1, er opfyldt.
In the first place, the service of the order for payment on the Chairman and Managing Director of the French company, to which no objection was lodged with­in the prescribed period, allowed contested proceedings to be commenced by lodging an objection and therefore constituted service on the defaulting French company of the document instituting proceedings, in due form and in sufficient time to enable it to ar­range for its defence, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 (2).
Fuldbyrdelse — udeblivelsesdom — hindringer for fuldbyrdelse (artikel 34, stk. 2) — retti­digforkyndelse af det indledende processkrift i sagen (artikel 27, nr. 2) — prøvelse af retti­digheden — kriterier — en konvention mellem de to stater fandt ikke anvendelse
The court dismissed as inadmissible the second part of the submission, to the effect that Article 688 of the German Code of Civil Procedure precluded recourse to the summary procedure for the recovery of a debt in international litigation; the court applied to for enforcement was not authorized, save in the circumstances specified in Articles 27 (2) and 47(1), to verify whether the foreign proceedings were properly conducted in ac­cordance with the foreign law.
På begæring af Durull, der var likvidator for det franske selskab Anciens Etablissements Camille Duceux, meddelte Corte d'appello di Bari fuldbyrdelsespåtegning på en udebli­velsesdom afsagt af Tribunal de commerce, Saint Dié, hvori fra Capezzone var blevet til­pligtet at betale et nærmere bestemt beløb.
The court dismissed the French company's submission that enforcement would be con­trary to French public policy inasmuch as the German order for payment had been granted in breach of the defendant's right to a fair hearing under a unilateral form of procedure in which only one party was heard and had not been accompanied by a state­ment of the reasons on which it was based.
Skyldneren, fra Capezzone, indgav begæring om genoptagelse og gjorde under henvisning til konventionens artikel 34, stk. 2, og arti­kel 27, nr. 2, gældende, at anerkendelsen af den franske udeblivelsesdom var sket med urette, da det indledende processkrift i sagen ikke var forkyndt i så god tid, at hun kunne have varetaget sine interesser under sagen.
Moreover, only judgments given where the claim was contested required a statement of reasons under French procedure and in any event the absence of a statement of reasons in a foreign judgment was not per se sufficient to prevent its being enforced if the documents produced to the court enabled it to deter­mine whether there was any breach of French public policy.
Desuden udtalte retten om de indbyrdes forskellige begreber, der anvendes i de to konventioner, at mens begrebet »tempo utile« i den bilaterale konvention anvendes i teknisk­processuel betyd­ning (hvilket forudsætter, at stævnevarslet er fastsat til et bestemt tidsrum) ses der ved an­vendelsen af begrebet »tempo congruo« (i så god tid) i domskonventionen artikel 27, nr. 2, bort fra enhver henvisning til de processuelle regler i den stat, hvor sagsøgeren har
The Cour de Cassation approved the view expressed by the Cour d'Appel that, save under the cir­cumstances specified in Articles 27 (2) and 47 (1), the Convention made no provision for the enforcing court to verify whether the proceedings in the foreign court had been con­ducted properly.
Fuldbyrdelse — udeblivelsesdom — hindringer for fuldbyrdelse (artikel 34, stk. 2) —for­skriftsmæssigforkyndelse af det indledende processkrift i sagen (artikel 27, nr. 2) — efter­prøvelse ved retterne i fuldbyrdelsesstaten — omfang — ingen afhjælpning af mangler ved forkyndelsen derved, at sagsøgte på anden måde har fået kendskab til sagen
Enforcement — Judgment in default — Grounds for refusal to enforce (second paragraph of Article 34) — Service in sufficient time of the document instituting the proceedings (Ar­ticle27(2)) — Appraisal of the suitability of the period allowed — Criteria — Irrelevance of the criterion adopted in another convention concluded in the field in question between the States concerned
Oberlandesgericht afslog i medfør af konventionens artikel 27, nr. 2, at erklære en ude­blivelsesdom, der var afsagt af en luxembourgsk ret den 11. november 1977, eksigibel med den begrundelse, at det indledende processkrift i sagen ikke var blevet forskrifts­mæssigt forkyndt for den tyske sagsøgte.
Mr Durull, the liquidator of a French company called "Anciens Etablissements Camille Duceux", obtained from the Corte d'Appello, Bari, an order for the enforcement of a judgment in default whereby the Tribunal de Commerce, Saint Dié, had ordered Mrs Capezzone to pay a sum of money.
Indkaldelsen til at give møde for den luxem­bourgske ret samt en genpart af stævningen var blevet sendt til den tyske sagsøgte i anbe­falet brev med modtagelsesbevis.
Appealing against that order, Mrs Capezzone ob­jected to recognition of the French judgment under the second paragraph of Article 34 and under Article 27 (2) of the Convention on the ground that the document instituting the proceedings had not been served on her in sufficient time to allow her to arrange for her defence.
Den luxembourgske rets konstatering af, at sagsøgte var blevet behørigt indstævnt, var hverken i faktisk eller retlig henseende bindende for ret­ten i anerkendelses­ og fuldbyrdelsesstaten ; denne skulle tværtimod selv foretage en prø­velse i henhold til konventionens artikler 34, stk. 2, og 27, nr. 2.
The appellant submitted inter alia that, in the absence of any provision of the Brussels Convention enabling the court to assess the suit­ability of the period allowed for entering an appearance, it was appropriate in this case to have recourse, by way of analogy, to the relevant provisions of the Convention of 3 June 1930 between France and Italy on the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Manglerne ved den formelle forkyndelse var heller ikke afhjulpet ved, at det anbefalede brev var nået frem til sagsøgte. En afhjælpning af mangler ved forkyndelsen i det inter­nationale retssamkvem kom ikke i betragtning, når der ikke var hjemmel hertil i de rele­vante internationale konventioner.
Whilst, on the one hand, the court ruled out the possibility of referring to the Convention between France and Italy for the purpose of clarifying the term "sufficient time", since that Convention had been superseded by the Brussels Convention (Article 55), on the other hand, it took into consideration the different terminology adopted in the two Conventions.
Den beskyttelse af en skyldner, som ikke bor i doms­staten, som artikel 27, nr. 2, tilsigter, ville i vidt omfang blive gjort værdiløs, hvis for­dringshaveren kunne gøre gældende, at skyldneren på anden måde rettidigt havde mod­taget det processkrift, der skulle forkyndes, eller havde fået kendskab til sagen fra anden side i så god tid, at han kunne have varetaget sine interesser under sagen eller i hvert fald have taget et retsmiddel i anvendelse.
The court observed that, whereas the expression "tempo utile" [sufficient time] was used in the first Convention in a technical sense with reference to procedural law (which presupposed that the period to be allowed for entering an appearance could be calculated precisely), the term "tempo congruo" [appropriate period] used in Article 27 (2) of the Brussels Convention dispensed with any reference to the rules of procedure in force either in the plaintiffs country or in the defendant's; instead it required the court to undertake an appraisal of the specific facts of each case.
Reglen i artikel 2, litra c), nr. 2, i den tysk­neder­landske konvention af 30. august 1962, hvorefter manglende forkyndelse af indkaldel­sen ikke er til hinder for anerkendelse af en afgørelse, når sagsøgte ikke har taget et rets­middel i anvendelse mod afgørelsen, selv om han har haft kendskab til den, havde netop ikke fundet indpas i konventionen.
On that basis the court arrived at the conclusion that the period of 57 days in which the defendant was able to arrange for her defence was appropriate, having regard to the facility of communications between Italy and the neighbouring French Republic.
Fuldbyrdelse — fremgangsmåde — efterprøvelse af kompetencen f or retterne i doms­staten — bestemmelse af disse retters kompetence i medfør af artikel 6, nr. 1 — begrebet »flere sagsøgte«
Enforcement — Procedure — Review by the court in which enforcement is sought of the jurisdiction of the adjudicating courts — Recognition of the jurisdiction of the latter on the basis of Article 6 ( 1 ) of the Convention — Theterm "a number of defendants"
Fuldbyrdelse — hindringer for fuldbyrdelse (artikel 34, nr.2) — forskriftsmæssig for­kyndelse eller meddelelse af det indledende processkrift i sagen (her: kravet om oversæt­telse af det processkrift, der skal forkyndes eller meddeles) — efterprøvelse på grundlag af loven på det sted, hvor afgørelsen er truffet
Enforcement — Grounds for refusal (second paragraph of Article 34) — Require­ments for due service of the document instituting the proceedings (in the present case, necessity of a translation) — Governed by the law of the adjudicating court
Fuldbyrdelse — hindringer for fuldbyrdelse (artikel 34, nr. 2) — oversættelse af det processkrift, der skal forkyndes eller meddeles, var ikke nødvendig ifølge den italienske lov om ratificering af Haag­konventionen af 1. marts 1954 — spørgsmål om forfat­ningsstridighed på grund af krænkelse af sagsøgtes rettigheder (den italienske forfat­nings artikel 24) — ikke forfatningsstridigt
Enforcement — Grounds for refusal (second paragraph of Article 34) — Need for a translation of the document requiring service — Absence of such a requirement in the Italian law ratifying the Hague Convention ofl March 1954 — Question of unconstitu­tionality for breach of the defendant's right to a fair hearing (Article 24 of the Italian Constitution) — Submission manifestly unfounded
Fuldbyrdelse — udeblivelsesdom — hindringer for fuldbyrdelse (artikel 34, nr. 2) — forskriftsmæssig og rettidig forkyndelse af det indledende processkrift i sagen (arti­kel?, nr. 2) — efterprøvelse af rettidigheden foretaget af retten i fuldbyrdelsesstaten — kriterier — princippet om varetagelse af sagsøgtes rettigheder under en kontradikto­riskprocedure
Enforcement — Judgment in default — Grounds for refusal of enforcement (second paragraph of Article 34) — Due service in sufficient time of the document which instituted the proceedings (Article 27(2)) — Appraisal by the court applied to for enforcement of the sufficiency of the period allowed for entering an appearance — Crite­ria — Defendant's right to a fair hearing
Det italienske firma Imcar, som tilhørte Tino Ruffini, havde solgt en maskine, det havde fremstillet, til det franske selskab Agemo, som gennem selskabet Locafrance SA videre­solgte maskinen under producentens garanti til den franske statsborger Adriencense.
The Italian undertaking "Imcar di Ruffini Tino" had sold a machine manufactured by it to the French company "Agemo", which through the intermediary of Locafrance SA re-sold it with the manufacturer's guarantee to Messrs Adriencense, French nationals.
Da maskinen havde mangler, anlagde køberen erstatningssag mod de tre selskaber Im­car, Agemog og Locafrance ved Tribunal de commerce, Valenciennes.
The machine proved to be defective, so the purchasers brought an action for damages in the Tribunal de Commerce, Valenciennes, against Imcar, Agemo and Locafrance.
Imcar blev ved udeblivelsesdom tilpligtet at betale beløbet.
Im­car, which failed to enter an appearance, was ordered to pay damages.