natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
»Gennemgangen af det præjudicielle spørgsmål har intet frembragt, der kan rejse tvivl om gyldigheden af artikel 1 i Kommissionens beslutning 961239/EF af 27. marts 1996 om visse hasteforanstaltninger til beskyttelse mod bovin spongiform encephalopati*
'Consideration of the question referred has disclosed no factor capable of affecting the validity of Article 1 of Commission Decision 96/239/EC of 27 March 1996 on emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy.'
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 30. september 1997.
Advocate General G. Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 30 September 1997.
Sag C-180/96 Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
Case C-180/96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ν Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
»Landbrug — veterinærpoliti 'kogalskab'* (Domstolens plenum)
(Agriculture — Animal health - Emergency measures against bovine encephalopathy — 'Mad cow disease') (Full Court)
Ved stævning indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 24. maj 1996 har Det Forenede Kongerige anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 96/239/EF af 27. marts 1996 og visse andre dispositioner fra Kommissionens side.
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 24 May 1996, the United Kingdom brought an action for annulment of Commission Decision 96/239/EC of 27 March 1996 and of certain other acts of the Commission.
anbefalede den, at de foranstaltninger, der for nyligt var truffet af Det Forenede Kongerige vedrørende udbening af slagtekroppe af kvæg på over 30 måneder i godkendte virksomheder, skulle anvendes i samhandelen i Fællesskabet, og at Fællesskabet skulle træffe passende foranstaltninger med henblik på at forbyde anvendelsen af kød- og benmel i dyrefoder.
transmissibility, which the Committee had always considered, it recommended that the measures recently adopted by the United Kingdom concerning the deboning of carcasses from cattle aged over 30 months in approved establishments should be implemented for intra-Community trade and that the Community should adopt appropriate measures as regards the ban on the use of meat meal and bone meal in animal feed.
Den 27. marts 1996 vedtog Kommissionen den anfægtede beslutning.
On 27 March 1996 the Commission adopted the contested decision.
Den 20. marts 1996 meddelte Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (»SEAC«), som er et rådgivende organ for Det Forenede Kongeriges regering, at den havde konstateret ti tilfælde af en variant af Creutzfeldt-Jakob-sygdommen hos personer under 42 år. Det anføres i SEAC's meddelelse: »Although there is no direct evidence of a link, on current data and in the absence of any credible alternative the most likely explanation at present is that these cases are linked to exposure to BSE before the introduction of the [specified bovine offal] ban in 1989. This is cause for great concern.«
In a statement dated 20 March 1996, the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee ('SEAC'), an independent scientific body which advises the United Kingdom Government, referred to ten cases of a variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease identified in people aged under 42.
Kommissionen og Rådet har nedlagt pastand om frifindelse og om, at Det Forenede Kongerige tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.
The Commission and the Council seek to have the action dismissed and the United Kingdom ordered to pay the costs.
Den 22. marts 1996 fastslog Den Europæiske Unions Videnskabelige Veterinærkomité, at der med de foreliggende oplysninger ikke var bevis for, at BSE kunne overføres til mennesker.
On 22 March 1996, the Scientific Veterinary Committee of the European Union concluded that, on the available data, it was not possible to prove that BSE was transmissible to humans.
På grund af den foreliggende risiko, som komitéen i øvrigt hele tiden havde taget hensyn til,
However, in view of the possibility of such
Af tilsvarende grunde som i ovennævnte sag C157/96 frifandt Domstolen Kommissionen eller afviste sagen.
On grounds practically identical to those relied on in Case C-157/96 (above), the Court dismissed the application in its entirety.
»l) Den af Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland anlagte sag afvises, for så vidt den angår Kommissionens udtalelser af 10. april, 13. april og 8. maj 1996
Déclares the action brought by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland inadmissible in so far as it seeks annulment of the Commissions statements of position of 10 April, 13 April and 8 May 1996;
2) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes, for så vidt den af Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland anlagte sag angår annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 96/239/EF af 27. marts 1996 om visse hasteforanstaltninger til beskyttelse mod bovin spongiform encephalopati.
Dismisses the action brought by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in sofaras it seeks annulment of Commission Decision 96/239/EC of 27 March 1996 on emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy;
Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland betaler sagens omkostninger.
Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs;
Rådet for Den Europæiske Union bærer sine egne omkostninger.*
Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.'
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 30. ■september 1997.
Advocate General G. Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 30 September 1997.
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende afgørelse:
He proposed that the Court:
»Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes, og Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirland tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.«
'- reject the application and order the applicant State to pay the costs.'
Sag C-386/96 Société Louis Dreyfus / C" / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Case C-386/96 Société Louis Dreyfus et Cic ν Commission of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
•Nødhjælp fra Fællesskabet til staterne i det tidligere Sovjetunionen — lån — remburs annullationssøgsmål -formaliteten kravet om, at sagsøgeren skal være umiddelbart berørt* (Domstolens plenum)
(Emergency assistance given by the Community to the States of the former Soviet Union -Loan —Documentary credit — Action pr annulment —Admissibility — 'Directly concerned') (Full Court)
Instans i sagen Dreyfus mod Kommissionen, (herefter »dommen« eller »den appellerede dom«), hvorved Retten afviste sagen, for så vidt angik påstanden om annullation af
Under the fourth paragraph of 173 of the Treaty, any natural or legal person may institute proceedings for the annulment of a decision addressed to that person or of a decision which, although in the form of a decision addressed to another person, is of direct and individual concern to the former.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 28. november 1996 har Louis Dreyfus & C (herefter »appellanten«) iværksat appel af dom afsagt den 24. september 1996 af De Europæiske Fællesskabers Ret i Første Page 8
By application lodged at the Registry of; the Court of Justice on 28 November 19%, LJouis Dreyfus & C* (hereinafter 'Dreyfus' or _BAR_ 'the appellant') brought an appeal against j the judgment of the Court of First Instance cjf 24 September 1996 in Dreyfus ν Commiæion (hereinafter 'the contested judgment'), dismissing as inadmissible its action for the annulment of the Commission's decision > f 1 April 1993 addressed to the Vnesheconomt ink. Page 8
Kommissionens beslutning af 1. april 1993 rettet til Vnesheconombank (herefter »VEB«).
In the present case the contested decision was formally addressed to the VEB.
efterprøvet, om den omtvistede beslutning i sig selv havde indvirkning på appellantens retsstilling, når det blev taget i betragtning, at de kompetente russiske myndigheder ikke havde noget skøn med hensyn til, om kontrakten skulle gennemføres på de af parterne aftalte vilkår i kontrakttillægget, som Kommissionen havde gjort indsigelse imod, selv om de derved måtte give afkald på fællesskabsfinansiering.
However, the findings of the Court of First Instance contain objective, relevant and consistent grounds for concluding that the appellant was directly concerned by the contested decision.
Det bemærkes, at i medfør af traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4, kan enhver fysisk eller juridisk person anlægge sag til prøvelse af beslutninger, der retter sig til ham, samt af beslutninger, som skønt de er udfærdiget i form af en beslutning rettet til en anden person, dog berører ham umiddelbart og individuelt.
The Court of First Instance dealt only with the question whether the applicant was directly concerned by the contested decision, since the Commission had not denied that the applicant was individually concerned.
I den foreliggende sag er den omtvistede beslutning formelt rettet til VEB.
It is thus clear that the contested decision whereby the Commission, in the exercise of its powers, refused to approve the addendum to the supply contract between Exportkhleb and Dreyfus deprived the latter of any real possibility of performing the contract awarded to it, or of obtaining payment for supplies made thereunder.
En række objektive, relevante og samstemmende oplysninger, som Retten har lagt til grund, viser, at appellanten var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning.
The Court's case-law shows that, for a person to be directly concerned by a Community measure, the latter must directly affect the legal situation of the individual and leave no discretion to the addressees of that measure who are entrusted with the task of implementing it, such implementation being purely automatic and resulting from Community rules without the application of other intermediate rules.
Retten har kun laget stilling til spørgsmålet, om appellanten var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning, da Kommissionen ikke havde bestridt, at appellanten var individuelt berørt.
Consequently, although the contested decision was addressed to the VEB, as financial agent of the Russian Federation, it directly affected the appellant's legal situation.
Det fremgår således, at den omtvistede beslutning fratog appellanten enhver faktisk mulighed for at opfylde den kontrakt, appellanten havde fået tildelt, eller opnå betaling af leveringer, der blev foretaget på de aftalte vilkår.
The same applies where the possibility for addressees not to give effect to the Community measure is purely theoretical and their intention to act in conformity with it is not in doubt.
Selv om den omtvistede beslutning var rettet til VEB i dennes egenskab af Den Russiske Føderations finansielle institution, findes den herefter umiddelbart at have påvirket appellantens retsstilling.
The Court of First Instance therefore erred in law in taking the view, in the light of the facts as found by it, that the appellant was not directly concerned, within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty, by the contested decision.
Det følger heraf, at Retten har anlagt en urigtig retlig bedømmelse ved at fastslå, at appellanten på baggrund af de faktiske omstændigheder, Retten har lagt til grund, ikke var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning i traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4's forstand.
The Court of First Instance should therefore have determined whether the contested decision alone affected the appellant's legal situation, since the competent Russian authorities had no discretion to forgo Community financing and have the contract performed in accordance with the conditions agreed between the parties in the addendum but repudiated by the Commission.
Appellanten skal derfor have medhold i appellen, i det omfang den vedrører afvisningen af sagen, for så vidt angår annullationspåstanden.
'I. Annuls the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 1996 in Case T485/93 Dreyfus ν Commission in so far as it dismisses as inadmissible the action for annulment brought by Louis Dreyfus & CT; 2.
I den foreliggende sag skulle Retten derfor have
Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance f or judgment on the substance;
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Reserves costs.'
3) Afgørelsen om sagens omkostninger udsættes.·
He proposed that the Court:
Han foreslog Domstolen at ophæve Rettens domme af 24. september 19% i sagerne T-485/93, T-491/93, T-494/93 og T-509/93, for så vidt som Retten herved afviste de sager, der var anlagt af henholdsvis Louis Dreyfus, Compagnie Continentale og Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 1. april 1993, og af Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 12. juli 1993, og fastslå, at sagerne bør antages til realitetsbehandling; hjemvise nærværende sager til Retten«.
Annul the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 1996 in Cases T-485/93, T491/93, T-494793 and T-509/93, in so far as they declare inadmissible the actions brought by Dreyfus, Continentale and Glencore for annulment of the decision of 1 April 1993, and by Glencore for annulment of the decision of 12 July 1993, and declare those actions admissible, and refer the cases back to the Court of First Instance.'
Sag C-391/96 Compagnie Continentale (France) SA / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Case C-391/96 Compagnie Continentale (France) SA ν Commission of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
»Nødhjælp fra Fællesskabet til staterne i det tidligere Sovjetunionen — lån — remburs — annullationssøgsmål —formaliteten — kravet om, at sagsøgeren skal være umiddelbart berørt« (Domstolens plenum) en anden person, dog berører ham umiddelbart og individuelt.
(Emergency assistance given by the Community to the States of the former Soviet Union — Loan —Documentary credit — Action f or annulment —Admissibility — 'Directly concerned') (Full Court)
I den foreliggende sag er den omtvistede beslutning formelt rettet til VEB.
The Court of First Instance dealt only with the question whether the applicant was directly concerned by the contested decision, since the Commission had not denied that the applicant was individually concerned.
Retten har kun taget stilling til spørgsmålet, om appellanten var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning, da Kommissionen ikke havde bestridt, at appellanten var individuelt berørt.
By an application lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 4 December 19%, Compagnie Continentale (France) SA (hereinafter 'Compagnie Continentale' or 'the appellant') brought an appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 19% in Compagnie Continentale ν Commission (hereinafter 'the contested judgment'), dismissing as inadmissible its action for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 1 April 1993 addressed to the Vnesheconombank.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 4. december 1996 har Compagnie Continentale (France) SA (herefter »appellanten«) i medfør af artikel 49 i EF-statutten for Domstolen iværksat appel af dom afsagt den 24. september 1996 af De Europæiske Fællesskabers Ret i Første Instans i sagen Compagnie Continentale mod Kommissionen (herefter »dommen«????? eller »den appellerede dom«), hvorved Retten afviste sagen, for så vidt angik påstanden om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 1. april 1993 rettet til Vnesheconombank (herefter »VEB«).
The Court's case-law shows that, for a person to be directly concerned by a Community measure, the latter must directly affect the legal situation of the individual and leave no discretion to the addressees of that measure who are entrusted with the task of implementing it, such implementation being purely automatic and resulting from Community rules without the application of other intermediate rules.
Det bemærkes, at i medfør af traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4, kan enhver fysisk eller juridisk person anlægge sag til prøvelse af beslutninger, der retter sig til ham, samt af beslutninger, som skønt de er udfærdiget i form af en beslutning rettet til
The same applies where the possibility for addressees not to give effect to the Community measure is purely theoretical and their intention to act in conformity with it is not in doubt.
Det fremgår af Domstolens praksis, at for at en sagsøger kan anses for at være umiddelbart berørt, skal den anfægtede fællesskabsforanstaltning umiddelbart have indvirkning på den pågældendes retsstilling, og foranstaltningen må ikke overlade et skøn til adressaterne, der skal gennemføre den, men
Under the fourth paragraph of 173 of the Treaty, any natural or legal person may institute proceedings for the annulment of a decision addressed to that person or of a decision which, although in the form of a decision addressed to another person, is of direct and individual concern to the former.
Det fremgår, at den omtvistede beslutning fratog Compagnie Continentale enhver faktisk mulighed for at opfylde den kontrakt, appellanten havde fået tildelt, eller opnå betaling af leveringer, der blev foretaget på de aftalte vilkår.
Consequently, although the contested decision was addressed to the VEB, as financial agent of the Russian Federation, it directly affected the appellant's legal situation.
Det samme gælder, når adressaterne kun har en rent teoretisk mulighed for at undlade at efterkomme fællesskabsretsakter, og der ikke er nogen tvivl om, at de vil give retsakten virkninger efter dens indhold.
alone affected the appellant's legal situation, since the competent Russian authorities had no discretion to forgo Community financing and have the contract performed in accordance with the conditions agreed between the parties in the addendum but repudiated by the Commission.
Det følger heraf, at Retten har anlagt en urigtig retlig bedømmelse ved at fastslå, at appellanten på baggrund af de faktiske omstændigheder, Retten har lagt til grund, ikke var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning i traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4's forstand.
However, the findings of the Court of First Instance contain objective, relevant and consistent grounds for concluding that the appellant was directly concerned by the contested decision.
Appellanten skal derfor have medhold i appellen, i det omfang den vedrører afvisningen af sagen, for så vidt angår annullationspåstanden.
It is thus clear that the contested decision deprived Compagnie Continentale of any real possibility of performing the contract awarded to it, or of obtaining payment for supplies made thereunder.
3) Afgørelsen om sagens omkostninger udsættes.*
Reserves costs.'
Generaladvokat A. La Pergola fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den lodecember 1997.
Advocate General A. La Pergola delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Full Court on 16 December 1997.
Han foreslog Domstolen at ophæve Rettens domme af 24. september 1996 i sagerne T-485/93, T-491/93, T-494/93 og T-509/93, for så vidt som Retten herved afviste de sager, der var anlagt af henholdsvis Louis Dreyfus, Compagnie Continentale og Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 1. april 1993, og af Glencore Grain Ltd med påstand om annullation af beslutningen af 12. juli 1993, og fastslå, at sagerne bør antages til realitetsbehandling;
Annul the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 19% in Cases T-485/93, T491/93, T-494793 and T-509/93, in so far as they declare inadmissible the actions brought by Dreyfus, Continentale and Glencore for annulment of the decision of 1 April 1993, and by Glencore for annulment of the decision of 12 July 1993, and declare those actions admissible, and refer the cases back to the Court of First Instance.'
Sag C-403/96 Glencore Grain Ltd / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
Case C-403/96 Glencore Grain Ltd ν Commission of the European Communities Law governing the institutions
•Nødhjælp fra Fællesskabet til staterne i det tidligere Sovjetunionen lån — remburs annullationssøgsmål -formaliteten — kravet om, at sagsøgeren skal være umiddelbart berørt« (Domstolens plenum)
(Emergency assistance given by the Community to the States of the former Soviet Union — Loan — Documentary credit — Action for annulment —Admissibility — 'Directly concerned') (Full Court) of the individual and leave no discretion to the addressees of that measure who are entrusted with the task of implementing it, such implementation being purely automatic and resulting from Community rules without the application of other intermediate rules.
Retten har kun taget stilling til spørgsmålet, om appellanten var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning, da Kommissionen ikke havde bestridt, at appellanten var individuelt berørt.
The same applies where the possibility for addressees not to give effect to the Community measure is purely theoretical and their intention to act in conformity with it is not in doubt.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 23. december 1996 har Glencore Grain Ltd, tidligere Richco Commodities Ltd (herefter »appellanten«) for Domstolen iværksat appel af dom afsagt den 24. september 1996 af De Europæiske Fællesskabers Ret i Første Instans i sagen Richco mod Kommissionen, (herefter »dommen« eller »den appellerede dom«), hvorved Retten afviste sagen, for så vidt angik påstanden om annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 1. april 1993 rettet til Vnesheconombank (herefter »VEB«).
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 23 December 1996, Glencore Grain Ltd, formerly trading as Richco Commodities Ltd (hereinafter 'Glencore' or 'the appellant' brought an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Richco ν Commission (hereinafter 'the contested judgment'), dismissing as inadmissible its action for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 1 April 1993 addressed to the Vnesheconombank.
Det fremgår af Domstolens praksis, at for at en sagsøger kan anses for at være umiddelbart berørt, skal den anfægtede fællesskabsforanstaltning umiddelbart have indvirkning på den pågældendes retsstilling, og foranstaltningen må ikke overlade et skøn til adressaterne, der skal gennemføre den, men gennemførelsen skal ske helt automatisk, udelukkende i medfør af fællesskabsretsreglerne og uden anvendelse af andre mellemkommende regler.
The appellant criticises the Court of First Instance for departing from the settled case-law of the Court of Justice, and of the Court of First Instance itself, in holding that the applicant was not directly concerned by the contested decision.
Appellanten har gjort gældende, at Retten har fraveget fast retspraksis ved Domstolen og ved Retten selv ved at fastslå, at appellanten ikke var umiddelbart berørt af den omtvistede beslutning.
The Court of First Instance should therefore have determined whether the contested decision alone affected the appellant's legal situation, since the competent Russian authorities had no discretion to forgo Community financing and have the contract performed in accordance with the conditions agreed between the parties in the addendum but repudiated by the Commission.
Det samme gælder, når adressaterne kun har en rent teoretisk mulighed for at undlade at efterkomme fællesskabsretsakter, og der ikke er nogen tvivl om, at de vil give retsakten virkninger efter dens indhold.
The findings of the Court of First Instance contain objective, relevant and consistent grounds for concluding that the appellant was directly concerned by the contested decision.