natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Gyldigheden af artikel 2, stk. 1, litra b), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2537/89 af 8. august 1989 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til de særlige foranstaltninger for sojabønner, som ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 150/90 af 19. januar 1990. Processprog: italiensk.
Mignini ν ΑΙΜΑ (Reference for a preliminary ruling) Pretore Circondi ari al e di Perugia Validity of Article 2 (1) (b) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No.2537/89 of 8 August 1989 laying down detailed rules for the application of the special measures to soya beans, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 150/90 of 19 January 1990.
Sag C-258/90 Pesquerías de Bermeo mod Kommissionen
Case C-258/90
Annullation af beslutningen af 6. juni 1990, hvorved Kommissionen fastslog, at forsØgstogtet i det sydvestlige Atlanterhav ikke opfylder de nødvendige betingelser for ydelse af finansiel fællesskabsstøtte, der er fastsat i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4028/86 af 18. december 1986. Processprog: spansk.
Pesquerías de Bermeo v Commission Declaration that the Commission's decision of 6 june 1990 deciding that the experimental fishing project in the waters of the South-West Atlantic does not fulfil the conditions for the award of Community financial aid under Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4028/86 of 18 December 1986 is void.
Sag C-259/90 Naviera Laida mod Kommissionen (se sag C-258/90)
Case C-259/90
Sag C-260/90 B. Leplat mod det franske oversøiske territorium Fransk Polynesien Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Tribunal de Paix de Papeete.
Naviera Laida v Commission (see Case C-258/90).
Sag C-261/90 M. Reichert m.fl. mod Dresdner Bank Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Cour d'Appel d'Aix-en-Provence Fortolkning af artikel 5, stk. 3, artikel 16, stk. 5, samt artikel 24 i Bruxelles-konventionen af 27. september 1968 - omstØdelsessØgsmål - gave i form af tinglige rettigheder over en fast ejendom. Processprog: tysk.
B. Leplat v Territoire de la Polynésie Française (Reference for a preliminary ruling) Tribunal de Paix de Papeete Interpretation of Article 133 (2) and (3) of the EEC Treaty - Validity of Article 74 of Council Decision 86/283/EEC of 30 June 1986 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Economic Community - Tax equivalent to a customs duty - Charging of an Import revenue
Sag C-262/90 J.-W. Schaffer mod Rådet og Kommissionen (se sag C-241/90).
J.-W. Schaffer ν Council and Commission (see Case C-241/90).
Sag T-38/90 Tjenestemairøssag.
Case T-38/90
Sag T-39/90 SEP mod Kommissionen Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning IV/33.539 af 2. august 1990 om en procedure i henhold til artikel 11, stk. 5, i Rådets forordning nr. 17/62/EØF - naturgas. Procesprog: nederlandsk.
SEP ν Commission Declaration that the Commission's Decision of 2 August 1990 concerning a procedure under Article 11 (5) of Council Regulation No. 17 (IV.33.539) 1s void - Natural gas.
ARBEJDET VED DE EUROP/fISKE FÆLLESSKABERS DOMSTOL OG RET I FØRSTE INSTANS *)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND OF THE CqURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Week of 8 to 12 October 1990
Landbrug Sag C-210/89 Kommissionen mod Den Italienske Republik Frie varebevægelser Sag C-196/89 Straffesag mod E. Nespoli og G. Crippa Frie varebevcgelser Sag C­200/89 FUNOC mod Kommissionen Socialpolitik Sag C-46/89 SICA m.fl. mod Kommissionen Landbrug
Case C-366/88 French Republic v Commission of the EC Agriculture Case C-34/89 Italian Republic v Commission of the EC Agriculture Case C-210/89 Commission of the EC v Italian Republic Free movement of goods Case C-196/89 Criminal Proceedings against E. Nespoli and G. Crippa Free movement of goods Case C-200/89 FUNOC v Commission of the CE Social Policy Case C-46/89 SICA and Others v Commission of the EC Agriculture
* DENNE PUBLIKATION UDARBEJDES AF DONSTOLENS INFORMATIONSTJENESTE HED HENBLIK Pi EN HURTIG ORIENTERING OH ARBEJDET VED DONSTOLEN OG RETTEN I FØRSTE INSTANS.
THIS BULLETIN IS PREPARED BY THE INFORMATION SERVICE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE IN ORDER TO SUPPLY READERS WITH RAPID INFORMATION ON THE WORK OF THE INSTITUTION.
DOMMENE OG DE FREMSATTE FORSLAG TIL AFGØRELSE OFFENTLIGGØRES SENERE I "SAMLING AF AFGØRELSER­, SOM ER ENESTE GYLDIGE UDGAVE.
HOWEVER, ONLY THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS PUBLISHED LATER IN THE REPORTS OF CASES BEFORE THE COURT IS AUTHENTIC.
Sag C-366/88: Den Franske Republik mod Kommissionen for De Europeiske Fatlesskaber
Case C-366/88 : French Republic ν Commission of the European Communities
9.10.1990 "Landbrug - interne tjenesteinstrukser - retsakter der kan gires til genstand for et søgsmål i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 173" (Plenum)
9 October 1990 (Agriculture - Internal instructions - Measure against which proceedings can be brought under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgivet den 16. december 1988, havde Den Franske Republik nedlagt pistand om annullation af de interne tjenesteinstrukser 88/C264/03.
By application lodged on 16 December 1988, the French Republic applied for a declaration that internal instructions 88/C264/03 were void.
Den nævnte retsakt, som er udstedt af Kommissionen under henvisning til Rådets forordnig nr. 729/70 om finansiering af den fælles landbrugspolitik, navnlig dennes artikel 9, indeholder visse administrative og tekniske regler, der skal fælges af de personer, der af Kommissionen bemyndiges til at foretage prøveudtagning og analyse af de udtagne priver som led i forvaltningen af og kontrollen med EUGFL.
These instructions, which the Commission adopted under Regulation No. 729/70 of the Council on the financing of the common agricultural policy and, in particular, Article 9 thereof, dealt with certain administrative and technical procedures to be followed by officials given powers by the Commission concerning sampling and analysis of products for the purposes of the management and control of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF).
Kommissionen havde påstået sagen afvist, da de interne instrukser, den indeholder, ikke afføder retlige eller økonomiske virkninger for de berørte erhvervsdrivende eller for medlemsstaterne, og ikke er en retsakt, til prøvelse af hvilken der kan anlægges sag i henhold til Traktatens artikel 173.
The Commission raised an objection of inadmissibility on the ground that the internal instructions to which the application related had no legal and financial effects for the operators concerned or for the Member States and therefore did not constitute a measure against which proceedings could be brought under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty.
Domstolen bemærkede hertil, at selv om sådanne retsakter i princippet ikke er beslutninger, der indeholder et klagepunkt, til prøvelse af hvilke der derfor kan anlægges annul lat i ons søgsmål i henhold til Traktatens artikel 173, adskiller den anfægtede retsakt sig imidlertid fra en ren tjenesteinstruks derved, at den indeholder Kommissionens stillingtagen til, hvilke beføjelser dens ansatte er tillagt med hensyn til prøveudtagning i henhold til forordning nr. 729/70, og må derfor antages at fremkalde nye retsvirkninger i forhold til dem, der følger af ovennævnte bestemmelse.
The Court held that, whereas in principle such measures did not constitute measures having adverse effect against which an action for annulment would lie under Article 173 of the Treaty, the contested measure differed from a mere instruction to officials in so far as it set out the Commission's position with regard to the extent of its officials' supervisory power concerning product sampling pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation No. 729/70 which might have new legal effects compared with those ensuing from Article 9.
Spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt afvisningspåstanden skulle tages til følge, måtte derfor afgøres på grundlag af en vurdering af de klagepunkter, Den Franske Republik havde fremført vedrørende den omtvistede retsakt, og navnlig argumentet om, at Kommissionen savnede kompetence til at udstede den.
It followed that the assessment of the objection of inadmissibility turned on the assessment of the complaints raised by the French Republic against the measure at issue and in particular of the claim that the Commission had exceeded its powers.
I den forbindelse bemærkede Domstolen først, at det er et led i den kontrolordning, der er indført ved ovennævnte artikel, at såfremt det måtte vise sig nødvendigt at foretage prøveudtagninger og analyser, skal de gennemføres af medlemsstaten, enten på eget initiativ eller på anmodning af Kommissionen.
In that connexion, the Court first observed that it followed from the supervisory system introduced by Article 9 of Regulation No. 729/70 that where product sampling and analysis proved necessary they were to be carried out by the Member State concerned, either on its own initiative or at the request of the Commission.
Det måtte derfor fastslås, fortsatte Domstolen, at når Kommissionen i henhold til den omtvistede retsakt var tillagt en i forhold til medlemsstaterne selvstændig beføjelse til at udtage prøver, og retsakten indeholder de nærmere regler herom, var den ikke kun en konkret udformning af reglerne i artikel 9 i forordnig nr. 729/70, men opstillede yderligere regler, hvilket Kommissionen ikke har beføjelse til i henhold til forordningen, idet den nævnte artikels stk. 3 bestemmer, at kun Rådet kan fastsætte de almindelige regler for anvendelsen af artiklen.
It therefore had to be held that, by giving the Commission the power to take samples independently of the Member States and by laying down the rules governing its intervention, the contested measure did not merely clarify the rules set out in Article 9 of Regulation No. 729/70 but added to the text of that provision, even though that regulation did not provide for such a power:
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The Court declared as follows:
De af Kommissionen vedtagne interne tjenesteinstrukser vedrørende visse administrative og tekniske regler, der skal følges af de personer, der af Kommissionen bemyndiges til at fortage prøveudtagning og analyse af de udtagne produkter som led i forvaltningen af og kontrollen med Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget (88/C264/03), annulleres.
The internal instructions (88/C264/03) concerning certain administrative and technical procedures to be followed by officials given powers by the Commission concerning sampling and analysis of products for the purposes of the management and control of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, adopted by the Commission, are declared void.
Generaladvokat Giuseppe Tesauro havde fremsat forslag til afgørelse den 12.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 12 July 1990.
Han foreslog, "at sagen blev afvist, idet den anfægtede retsakt ikke opfylder de væsentlige formforskrifter, der kræves for en bindende retsakt, og at hver af parterne bar sine omkostninger, henset til den usikkerhed, der objektivt set består med hensyn til, om en medlemsstat kan anlægge sag til prøvelse af retsakten".
He proposed that the Court should "declare the application inadmissible in so far as the contested measure does not satisfy the essential formal requirements of a binding measure, and order the parties to pay their own costs in view of the objective uncertainty as to whether proceedings may be brought against the measure by a Member State".
Såfremt Domstolen måtte finde, at indholdet af den anfægtede retsakt burde prøves, foreslog han, at "sagen antoges til realitetsbehandling, at sagsøgerens påstand blev taget til følge, og retsakten blev annulleret på grund af Kommissionens inkompetence, og at Kommissionen dømtes til at betale sagens omkostninger".
If the Court were to consider the substance of the contested measure, the Advocate General proposed that it should "declare the application admissible and accept the substance thereof by declaring the contested measure void in view of the Commission's lack of competence and to order it to pay the costs".
Sag C-34/89: Den Italienske Republik mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
Case C-34/89 : Italian Republic ν Commission of the European Communities
11.10.1989 "Landbrug - afslutning af EUGFL-regnskaber - regnskabsåret 1986 - tilbagesøgning af beløb udbetalt med urette" (Domstolens plenum)
11 October 1990 (Agriculture - Clearance of EAGGF accounts - Expenditure for 1986 - Recovery of aid wrongly paid) (Full Court)
Ved stævning indgivet den 9. februar 1989 havde Den Italienske Republik anlagt sag med påstand om delsvis annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 88/630/EØF om afslutning af medlemsstaternes regnskaber over de udgifter for regnskabsåret 1986, der er finansieret gennem EUGFL i det omfang, hvori det i beslutningen bestemmes, at EUGFL, ikke skal afholde et beløb på 10.410.055.894 lire. Dette beløb havde de italienske myndigheder udbetalt til en række olivenolieproducenter i form af forskud på produktionsstøtte mellem 1978 og 1984, hvilket var større end den støtte, der faktisk skulle ydes.
By application lodged on 9 February 1989, the Italian Republic sought the partial annulment of Commission Decision 88/630/EEC on the clearance of the accounts presented by the Member States in respect of the expenditure for 1986 of the European Guidance and Guarantee Fund in so far as in that decision the Commission refused to accept as chargeable to the Fund LI1 10 410 055 894 which had been paid by the Italian authorities to a number of producers of olive oil by way of advances on aid for production between 1978 and 1984.
Hertil kom ifølge Kommissionen, at de italienske myndigheder ikke med fornøden hurtighed havde iværksat procedurerne til tilbagesøgning af de beløb, der var udbetalt med urette.
The reason for the Commission's refusal was that the sums advanced turned out to
- 4 sædvanligt efter gældende nationale regler, det vil her sige inden 10 år.
- 4 be in excess of the aid actually due and the Italian authorities had not taken sufficient steps to recover the sums paid in excess.
Denne frist var - anførtes det - ikke udløbet ved fremsendelsen af skrivelserne om tilbagesøgning i udgangen af juni 1988.
In its view this period had not expired, since the letters relating to the recovery of the payments made in excess had been sent out at the end of June 1988.
Indledningsvis bemærkede Domstolen i den forbindelse, at det ikke er i over ensstemmelse med den tilstræbte ensartethed inden for landbrugspolitikken og Fællesskabets budgetlægning, at medlemsstaterne har mulighed for at influere på denne politiks økonomiske følger alt efter indholdet af deres nationale bestemmelser, herunder nationale fristregler.
In this regard, the Court observed in the first place that it would be contrary to the uniform nature of the common agricultural policy and to the Community budget if the Member States could vary the financial consequences of the policy depending on their national rules, including the rules governing time-limits.
Herefter kunne Domstolen fastslå, at det er fællesskabsretten, der skal lægges til grund ved placeringen af ansvaret for uregelmæssigheder eller forsømmelser i betydningen i artikel 8, stk. 2, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 729/70 om finansiering af den fælles landbrugspolitik, inden for rammerne af forbindelser ne mellem staterne og Kommissionen.
It followed that responsibility for negligence within the meaning of Article 8 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No. 729/70 of the Council on the financing of the common agricultural policy, in the context of relations between the Member States and the Commission, had to be determined under Community law.
Fællesskabsretten stiller for så vidt angår forordninger, der vil kunne have Økonomiske virkninger, flere krav til medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen: EF-landene skal først og fremmest i overensstemmelse med EØF-Traktatens artikel 5 generelt udvise omhu, og kravet herom gentages og uddybes i de to første stykker i nævnte artikel 8.
As far as rules likely to have financial consequences were concerned, Community law subjected the Member States and the Commission to several requirements: in the first place, the Member States had to comply with the general duty of diligence under Article 5 of the EEC Treaty, as specified by the first two paragraphs of Article 8 of Regulation No. 729/70.
Forpligtelsen hertil antages at antages at indebære, at medlemsstaterne hurtigt skal træffe foranstaltninger for at berigtige uregelmæssigheder, hvilket ikke er sket, når en medlemsstat som i det foreliggende tilfælde venter fra fire til ti år med at rejse krav om tilbagebetaling af beløb, der er udbetalt med urette.
That duty meant that the Member States had to take steps to deal with irregularities promptly, which was not the case where a Member State waited, as in this case, four to ten years before taking steps to recover amounts paid in excess.
Domstolen bemærkede dernæst, at det af hensyn til vished og beregnelighed i de økonomiske forbindelser mellem Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne er nødvendigt, at Kommissionen klart over for disse oplyser, hvad dens kritik gælder, og først efter udløbet af en rimelig frist drager de Økonomiske konsekvenser af, at de ikke har opfyldt deres forpligtelser.
Secondly, with a view to the certainty and foreseeability of financial relations between the Commission and the Member States, the Commission had clearly to indicate to them what they were reproached with and had to take the necessary financial action resulting from their failure to fulfil their obligations only after the lapse of a reasonable time.
Det måtte i den forbindelse konstateres, at Kommissionens tjenestegrene allerede i 1985 havde konstateret, at tiIbagesøgningsprocedurerne var forsinket, og at Kommissionen i 1988 havde meddelt de italienske myndigheder, at den havde til hensigt at afvise, at EUGFL skulle afholde det omhandlede beløb.
In that connexion, the Court observed that as long ago as 1985 the Commission departments had reported delays in the recovery procedures and that in 1988 the Commission had warned the Italian authorities of its intention not to accept the amount at issue as chargeable to the EAGGF.
Den Italienske Republik betaler sagens omkostninger bortset fra omkostningerne i forbindelse med behandlingen af den under sagen frafaldne søgsmålsgrund."
The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs with the exception of those relating to the complaint which was withdrawn in the course of the proceedings."
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet den 12.
Mr Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 12 July 1990.
Sag C-210/89: Kommissionen for De Europeiske Fællesskaber mod Den Italienske Republik
Case C-210/89 : Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
11.10.1990 "Traktatbrud - frie varebevægelser - forbud mod omsætning af ost, som ikke opfylder betingelserne i italiensk lovgivning" (Domstolens plenum)
11 October 1990 (Free movement of goods - Failure to fulfil obligations - Ban on the marketing of cheese not complying with Italian rules) (Full Court)
Ved stævning, indgået til Domstolen den 6. juli 1989, havde Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber anlagt sag med påstand om, at det statueredes, at Den Italienske Republik havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser efter EØF-Trakta-tens artikel 30 og artikel 22 i Rådets forordning nr. 804/68 ved at gøre indførsel af ost til Italien betinget af, at produkterne opfylder visse krav i lov nr. 396, navnlig de bestemmelser, som forbyder, at der med henblik på salg fremstilles osteprodukter med et mindre fedtindhold end foreskrevet i italiensk lovgivning.
By application lodged at the Court on 6 July 1989, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action for a declaration that, by making the importation of cheeses into Italy conditional upon compliance with Italian Law No. 396, in particular those provisions which prohibited the production with a view to marketing of cheeses whose fat content was less than that prescribed by Italian legislation, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil Its obligations under Article 30 of the EEC Treaty and Article 22 of Regulation No. 804/68 of the Council.
Den Italienske Republik gjorde for det første gældende, at italiensk lovgivning ikke direkte forbyder indførsel eller salg af osteprodukter med et lavere fedtindhold end foreskrevet i lovgivningen, men disse må blot ikke bringes i handelen under betegnelsen "ost".
The Italian Government argued in the first place that the legislation at issue did not place a ban upon the importation or sale of cheeses whose fat content was less than that prescribed by that legislation, provided that the cheeses were not marketed as "cheeses".
Herom fremhævede Domstolen, at så længe der ikke findes EF-regler på området, står det vel enhver medlemsstat frit at fastsætte bestemmelser, hvorefter produkterne skal have et vist mindsteindhold af fedt, for at de kan forsynes med artsbetegnelsen "ost" af de nationale producenter, men at det strider mod Traktatens artikel 30 og formålene med det fælles marked også at anvende bestemmelserne på importerede osteprodukter, når produkterne er lovligt fremstillet og bragt i omsætning i en anden medlemsstat under samme betegnelse, men med et ringere fedtindhold.
In that connexion, the Court pointed out that, whilst in the absence of Community rules governing the matter any Member State could lay down rules making the use by domestic producers of the generic description "cheeses" subject to compliance with a minimum fat content, it was incompatible with Article 30 of the Treaty and the objectives of the common market to extend the application of such rules to imported cheeses lawfully manufactured and marketed in another Member State under that description but having a lower fat content.
Den Italienske Republik gjorde endvidere gældende, at så længe der ikke findes EF-regler på området, vil anvendelsen af et princip om fri bevægelighed for nrodukter, som opfylder kravene i den stat, hvor de er fremstillet, og ikke i den stat, hvortil de importeres og bringes i handelen, for Italiens vedkommende indebære en alvorlig risiko for forvekslinger til skade for forbrugerne, idet betegnelsen "ost" ifølge italiensk lovgivning er forbeholdt osteprodukter med et mindsteindhold af fedt.
The Italian Republic further argued that, in view of the absence of such Community rules, the application of the principle of the free movement of products complying with the rules in force in the State where they were manufactured but not with those of the importing State where they were to be marketed would give rise to serious confusion to the detriment of consumers in a case such as that of Italy where the description "cheese" was restricted under national law to cheeses with a certain minimum fat content.
Dog udtalte den først, at en ordning, der hindrer EF's samhandel, men, som i denne sag, gælder uden forskel for indenlandske og importerede produkter, kan tænkes at være lovlig efter Traktatens artikel 30, såfremt den er nødvendig for at varetage tvingende hensyn bl.a. til beskyttelsen af forbrugerne og til god handelsskik.
Rules impeding intra-community trade which, as in the case of the rules at issue here, applied to national products and imported products alike could not be regarded as being justified by imperative requirements relating to the defence of the consumer and fairness of commercial transactions where, in order to achieve those ends, it would be