natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det drejer sig om foranstaltninger, som vedrører 1) offentlige aftaler, 2) statsstøtte og offentlige tilskud, 3) adgangen til lokal kredit, 4) fiskale bestemmelser og 5) bestemmelser om investeringer, bortset fra direkte investeringer og investeringer, der foretages af direkte ejede datterselskaber, dvs. i tilfælde, hvor moderselskabet ikke er hjemmehørende.
conditions for the participation of foreigncontrolled undertakings in the internal economic life of die Member States in which they operate, the fact remains that it also applies to the conditions for their participation in trade between the Member States and nonmember countries, conditions which are the subject of the common commercial policy of the Community.
I denne forbindelse bemærkes, at det fremgår af Domstolens praksis, at Fællesskabets eksklusive kompetence udadtil ikke ipsofacto følger af dets kompetence til internt at fastsætte regler.
It is true that, as die Court stated in Opinion 1/76, the external competence based on the Community's internal powers may be exercised, and thus become exclusive, without any internal legislation having first been adopted.
Medlemsstaterne mister, uanset om de handler enkeltvis eller samlet, først deres ret til at påtage sig forpligtelser over for tredjelande, efterhånden som der indføres fælles regler, som vil kunne påvirkes af disse forpligtelser.
However, this relates to a situation where the conclusion of an international agreement is necessary in order to achieve Treaty objectives which cannot be attained by the adoption of autonomous rules. It is undisputed that that is not the case here.
Selv om bestemmelserne om national behandling således primært vedrører betingelserne for, at udenlandsk kontrollerede virksomheder kan deltage i det indre økonomiske liv i de medlemsstater, hvor de opererer, finder de imidlertid også anvendelse på betingelserne for virksomhedernes deltagelse i samhandelen mellem medlemsstaterne og tredjelande, og disse betingelser henhører under Fællesskabets fælles handelspolitik.
So far as the participation of foreigncontrolled undertakings in ¡ntra-Communiry trade is concerned, such trade is governed by the Community's internal market rules and not by the rules of its common commercial policy.
For så vidt udenlandsk kontrollerede virksomheder deltager i samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet, bemærkes blot, at reglerne herom henhører under bestemmelserne om Fællesskabets indre marked og ikke under den fælles handelspolitik.
Accordingly, the national treatment rule relates only partially to international trade with nonmember countries: it affects internal trade to the same extent as international trade, if not more so.
Som Domstolen fastslog i udtalelse 1/76, vil den eksterne kompetence, der støttes på, at Fællesskabet internt har kompetence, ganske vist kunne udnyttes, selv om der ikke forinden er vedtaget intern lovgivning, og dermed blive eksklusiv.
Accordingly, it is necessary to ascertain whether the matters covered by the Third Decision are already the subject of internal legislation containing provisions on the treatment to be accorded to foreigncontrolled undertakings, or empowering the institutionsto negotiate with nonmember countries, or effecting complete harmonization of the rules governing the right to take up an activity as a self-employed person.
Dette gælder imidlertid kun i tilfælde, hvor det er nødvendigt at indgå en international aftale af hensyn til virkeliggørelsen af mål i traktaten, der ikke kan realiseres ved, at Fællesskabet selv fastsætter regler.
It follows fTOm the case-law of the Court that in those drcumstancesthe Community has exclusive competence to enter into international obligations.
Bestemmelserne om national behandling vedrører således kun delvis den internationale samhandel med tredjelande, og den berører mindst lige så meget, om ikke mere, den interne handel som den internationale handel.
To the extent that it concerns the conditions under which foreigncontrolled undertakings are involved in international transport to or from nonmember countries, the national treatment rule also falls outside the scope of Article 113.
For så vidt bestemmelserne om national behandling vedrører betingelserne for, at udenlandsk kontrollerede virksomheder kan deltage i internationale transporter med tredjelande, falder de ligeledes uden for artikel 113's anvendelsesområde.
It follows from the foregoing that Article 113 does not confer exclusive competence on the Commission to participate in the Third Decision.
Det må derfor undersøges, om det område, den tredje beslutning omfatter, allerede er genstand for interne retsakter, som enten indeholder bestemmelser vedrørende den behandling, der skal indrømmes udenlandsk kontrollerede virksomheder, eller tillægger institutionerne kompetence til at forhandle med tredjelande, eller hvorved der gennemføres en fuldstændig harmonisering af reglerne for adgang til at udøve virksomhed som selvstændig erhvervsdrivende.
It should be noted, first of alt, that although the Community has adopted measures capable of serving as a basis for an exclusive external competence in accordance with the aforesaid case-law and falling in particularwithin the scope of Articles 57(2), 75, 84 and 100a of the EC Treaty, it is undisputed that those measures do not cover all the fields of activity to which the Third Decision relates.
Fællesskabet vil i så fald være enekompetent til at indgå internationale forpligtelser.
It follows that the Community is competent to participate in the Third Decision, but that such competence does not cover all the matters to which that decision relates.
Det følger af det anførte, at Fællesskabet ikke i henhold til artikel 113 er enekompetent til at deltage i den tredje beslutning.
In the alternative, the Commission argues that participation by the Community in the Third Decision could be based not only on Article 113 but also on Article 57 and, in the further alternative, on Article 100a.
Subsidiært har Kommissionen anført, at ud over med hjemmel i artikel 113 vil Fællesskabets deltagelse i den tredje beslutning kunne ske med hjemmel i artikel 57 og mere subsidiært med hjemmel i artikel 100 A. Hvis Domstolen
In that regard, the Court has consistently held, that the Community's exclusive external competence does not automatically flow from its power to lay down rules at internal level. The Member States, whether acting individually or collectively, only lose their right to enter into obligations with nonmember countries as and
Fællesskabet er herefter kompetent til at deltage i den tredje beslutning, men denne kompetence omfatter ikke alle de emner, beslutningen vedrører.
only where no other provision of the Treaty gives lhe Community institutions the necessary power to adopt the measure in question.
Fællesskabet er kompetent til at deltage i OECD's tredje rendende beslutning.
The Community OECD.
Kompetencen til at deltage i denne beslutning tilkommer dés Fællesskabet, dels medlemsstaterne.*
The Community and the Member States share joint competence to participate in thai decision.'
Præjudiciel — Bundesfinanzhof — fortolkning af position 30.03 (lægemidler) og 21.07 {andre tilberedte næringsmidler, ikke andetsteds tariferet) i den fælles toldtarif — produkter som doserede, sterile blandinger af forskellige aminosyrer i pulverform til fremstilling af infusionsopløsninger
Preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Common Customs Tariffheadings 30.03 (medicaments) and21.07 (foodpreparations not elsewhere specified or included) — Products such as powdered sterile mixtures of various amino acids in measured doses for the manufacture of infiision solutions intended purpose, on account of their particular attributes, is to be used, as such or after specified processing, as natural foodstuffs or to be incorporated in food preparations.
Generaladvokat G, Kosmag fremsatte fojggg til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Ajdeling) den 23. marts 1995.
Advocate General Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 23 March 1995.
I sidstnævnte tilfælde nar den blotte mulighed for andre anvendelser af disse produkter (f.eks. med henblik pi fremstilling af infusionsopløsninger) ingen betydning, og deres senere tarifering under de underpositioner, som henhører under position 21.07, sker på grundlag af kriterier, som anvendes for disse underpositioner, øg det foreliggende tilfældes konkreteomstændigheder, som det tilkommer de nationale domstole at fastslå.«
Staff case — Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) in Joined Cases T-18/92 and T-68/92 between Mr Coussios and the Commission — Compensation for damage resulting from the unlawful amendment of a vacancy notice and from the rejection of an application —Inadequacy of the amount granted by way of compensation for maladministration
»Den fælles toldtarif som ændret ved bilaget til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3618/86 skal fortolkes således, at produkter som sterile blandinger af aminosyrer, som ikke er emballeret
'The Common Customs Tariff, as amended by the Annex to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3618/86, should be interpreted as meaning that products such as sterile mixtures of amino acids, not packaged for sale by retail, in powdered form and in highly specific doses: (1) fall within heading 30.03 (subheading 30.03 A II b) if their only intended use, on account of their particular attributes, is for the preparation of infusion solutions; (2) fall within heading 21.07 if their
ansøgningen alene med det formil at overdrage licensen til en anden.
where appropriate, be registered in category C, provided that the relevant conditions are fulfilled in other respects.
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Tredje Afdeling! den 23. marts 1995.
Advocate General Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Third Chamber on 23 March 1995.
— Artikel 3, stk. 2, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 finder ikke anvendelse på erhvervsdrivende, der omfattes af artikel 2, litra c), i samme forordning.«
Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 does not apply to the operators referred to in Article 2(c) of that regulation.'
SagC-456/93 Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. Frankfurt / Privatkellerei Franz Wilhelm Langguth Erben GmbH & Co. KG Præjudiciel — Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main —fortolkning af artikel 19, stk. 1, litra c), i Rodetsforordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer og af artikel 2, litra c), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 om gennemførelsesbestemmeherforEF'simportordning for bananer
Case C-456/93 Zentrale zur Bekämpfung Unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. Frankfurt ν Privatkellerei Franz Wilhelm Langguth Erben GmbH & Co. KG Preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Interpretation of Article 19(l)(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 on the common organization of the banana markets and of Article 2(c) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442193 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of importing bananas into the Community
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling') den 23. marts 1995.
Advocate General Elmer delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 23 March 1995.
Præjudiciel—Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main - fortolkning af artikel 40, stk 3, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2392/89 om almindelige regler for betegnelse og præsentation af vin og druemost — anvendelse af benævnelserne •Kabinett*, »Spätlese* og »Auslese* i mærkning af »Qualitätsweine mit Prädikat* — begrebet •Weissherbst·
Preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Interpretation of Article 40(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2392/89 laying down general rules for the description and presentation of wines and grape musts — Use of the terms 'Kabinett', 'Spätlese' and 'Auslese' in the labelting of 'Qualitatsweine mit Prädikat' Definition of 'Weissherbst
Generaladvokat P. Léger fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdelingì den 23. marts 1995.
Advocate General Léger delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 23 March 1995.
Han foreslog at svare således:
He proposed that the Court should rule as follows:
·— Artikel 19, stk. 1, litra c), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 404/93 om den fælles markedsordning for bananer og artikel 2, litra c), i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1442/93 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for EFs importordning for bananer skal fortolkes således, at de af disse bestemmelser omfattede erhvervsdrivende i 1992 eller senere skal have nedsat sig eller ved indgivelse af ansøgning om importlicens have tilkendegivet, at de agter at nedsætte sig som handlende inden for banansektoren.
'Article 19(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 on the common organization of the banana markets and Article 2(c) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of importing bananas into the Community must be interpreted as meaning that the operators covered by those provisions must have been established in 1992 or later or, by the submission of an application for the grant of an import licence, have expressed the intention of establishing themselves as operators in the banana sector.
- En ansøgning om importlicens kan ikke afslås under henvisning til, at ansøgeren har indgivet
The fact that an operator went into business before 1992 with a view to importing bananas in 1992 or later is not sufficient in itself for the person concerned "to have marketed" bananas in the sense in which the aforesaid regulations use that expression in relation to operators in categories A and B; the operator concerned may,
»1) Artikel 3, stk. 2, i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3201/90 af 16. oktober 1990 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for betegnelse og præsentation af vin og druemost skal fortolkes således, at den ikke er til hinder for, at mærkning af 'Qualitätsweine mit Prädikat' gentager benævnelserne 'Kabinett', 'Spätlese* eller 'Auslese' ud over den foreskrevne angivelse (med bogstaver af samme type og samme højde
Article 3(3)(a), first indent, in conjunction with Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3201/90 must be interpreted as not precluding the
som navnet pi det bestemte dyrkningsområde) med andre og større bogstaver, navnlig på iøjnefaldende vis som del af en mærkebetegnelse.
repetition, in the case of German quality wines produced in specified regions ("Qualitatsweine U.A."), of the term 'Weissherbst" — in addition to its use in the same lettering as that used for indicating the specified region — in large letters, particularly in a conspicuous manner as part of a brand name.'
Præjudiciel - Tribunal dm commerce de Mons -fortolkning af EF-traktatens artikel 30 - national lovgivning som forbyder salg med ekstremt lav avance
'Article 30 of the EEC Treaty does not apply to a national provision, couched in general terms, which prohibits a sale at a price higher than the price invoiced at the time of supply but with an extremely small profit margin by treating it as equivalent to a sale at a loss, where, as in the case of the provision in question, that provision applies to all operators (wholesalers and retailers) carrying on business on the national territory and affects in the same way, in law and hi fact, the marketing of national products and those from other Member States.'
Generaladvokat Gr Kosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette AfdettngV den 23.
Case C-63/94 Groupement National des Négociants en Pommes de Terre de Belgique (Belgapom) ν SA ÏTM Belgium and SA Vocarex
»EØF-traktatens artikel 30 finder ikke anvendelse pi en national bestemmelse, som er formuleret i generelle vendinger, og som, ved at sidestille det med et salg med tab, forbyder salg til en pris, som ganske vist er højere end den pris, som blev faktureret for varen af leverandøren, men som kan giver en ekstremt lav avance, hvis den pågældende bestemmelse som i dette tilfælde gælder for atte erhvervsdrivende (grossister og detailhandlere), der udøver deres virksomhed pi det nationale område, og retligt og faktisk påvirker forhandling af indenlandske varer og af varer hidrørende fra andre medlemsstater på samme måde.«
Preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Commerce de Mons - Interpretation of Article 30 of the EC Treaty — National legislation prohibiting sale with a very small profit margin
Passivitetssøgsmål med påstand om, at det fastslås, at Kommissionen ulovligt har undladt at tage stilling til den klage, som sagsøgeren har indgivet i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 85 og 86 (IV/32.791-Remail) om hindringer for den »remaiU-praksis, som følger af visse medlemsstaters postvæsners adfærd
Action for failure to act seeking a declaration that the Commission has unlawfully refrained from defining its position on the applicant's complaint based on Articles 85 and 85 of the EC Treaty (IV/32.791-Remail) concerning obstacles to the practice of 'remail' resulting from the conduct of the postal authorities of certain Member States.
Se sag T-37/95
See Case T-37/95
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning af 30. november 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EF-traktaten (IV/33.126 og 33322 - cement) eller subsidiært nedsættelse af den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren
Annulment of the Commission decision of 30 November 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EC Treaty (TV/33.126 and 33322—Cement) or, in the alternative, reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant
Se sag T-37/95
Case T-38/95 Groupe Origny ν Commission
Annullation af Kommissionens forordning nr. 3224/94 om overgangsforanstaltninger for anvendelsen af den rammeaftale om bananer, der er indgiet som led i de multilaterale handelsforhandlinger i Uruguay-rundens regi
Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 3224/94 laying down transitional measuresfor the implementation of the framework agreement on bananas concluded within the framework of multilateral commercial negotiations in the Uruguay round
Se sag T-36/95
See Case T-36/95
Sag T-59/95
Case T-59/95 Oficement v Commission
Sag T-60/95
Case T-60/95 Irish Cement v Commission
Se sag T-37/95
CaseT-69/95 Hisalba ν Commission
Se sag T-37/95
CaseT-70/95 Aker ν Commission
Se sag T-37/95
Case T-67/95 R. Lassek ν Council and Commission
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolene Informationstjeneste (L-2925 Luxembourg) med JgjlnMlr på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten 1 Første Instans. îliimi'— «g de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere 1 »Samling af Jfamwgtb tom er eneste gyldige udgave.
This bulletin is issued by the Court's Information Service (L-2925 Luxembourg) to provide rapid information on the work or the Court. However, it is only the text of the judgments and opinions published in the European Court Reports that is authentic.
Originalsprog: fransk Redaktionen afsluttet de» 273.1995 Katulognr. : DX-AC-95-0O8-DA-C
Original version: French Completed on: 27.03.1995 Catalogue No: DX-AC-95-008-EN-C
Ugen 27.-31. marts 1995
27 to 31 March 1995
Sag T-12/94 Frédéric Daffix / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Personalesag
Case T-12/94 12 Frédéric Daffix v Commission of the European Communities Staff cases
Sag T-497/93 10 Anne Hogan / De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol Personalesag
Case T-497/93 Anne Hogan v Court of Justice of the European Communities Staff cases
Sag C-65/93 Europa-Parlamentet / Rådet for den Europæiske Union Institutionelle spørgsmål
Case C-65/93 European Parliament v Council of the European Union Law governing the institutions
Sag C-21/94 Europa-Parlamentet / Rådet for den Europæiske Union
Case C-182/94 16 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
Sag C-182/94 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Italienske Republik
Case C-57/94 Commission of the European Communities ν Italian Republic
Præjudiciel »Frie varebevægelser — import af narkotiske midler (diacetylmorfin)* (Domstolens plenum)
Preliminary ruling (Free movement of goods — Importation of a narcotic drug (diamorphine)) (Full Court)
Ved kendelse af 23. juni 1993 indgået til Domstolen den 25. juni s.a. har High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) forelagt to præjudiciellespørgsmålvedrørendefortolkningen af EØF-traktatens artikel 30, 36 og 234 og af Rådets direktiv 77/62/EØF, som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 88/295/EØF.
Until 1992, under the policy prevailing at that time in the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State prohibited importation of diamorphine and allowed Macfarlan to have the exclusive right to manufacture the product and Evans to have the exclusive right to process the product for medical use and marketing within the United Kingdom.
Indtil 1992 forbød Secretary of State import af produktet i overensstemmelse med den daværende politik i Det Forenede Kongerige og gav Macfarlan eneret til at fremstille produktet og Evans eneret til forarbejdning af produktet med henblik på lægelig brug og forhandling i Det Forenede Kongerige.
By order of 23 June 1993, received at the Court on 25 June 1993, the High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) referred for a preliminary ruling two questions on the interpretation of Articles 30, 36 and 234 of the EEC Treaty and of Council Directive 77/62/EEC as amended by Council Directive 88/295/EEC ('the directive').
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under en sag anlagt af Evans Medical Ltd og Macfarlan Smith Ltd mod Secretary of State for the Home Department (indenrigsministeren, herefter benævnt »Secretary of State«), støttet af Generics (UK) Ltd, vedrørende Generics' import til Det Forenede Kongerige af et parti diacetylmorfin fra Nederlandene.
Those questions have arisen in proceedings brought by Evans Medical Ltd ('Evans') and Macfarlan Smith Ltd ('Macfarlan') against the Secretary of State for the Home Department ('the Secretary of State'), supported by Generics (UK) Ltd ('Generics'), in connection with Generics' importation into the United Kingdom of a consignment of diamorphine originating in the Netherlands.
Virksomheden anlagde efter at have opnået tilladelse dertil sag til prøvelse af afgørelsen om afslag for at få fastslået, at den var i strid med traktatens artikel 30 og ikke var berettiget i henhold til artikel 36. Under sagen anerkendte Secretary of State, at der ikke var grundlag for at afslå at give tilladelse til Generics og oplyste, at afgørelsen var taget op til fornyet vurdering.
After obtaining leave, Generics brought an action for judicial review of the decision refusing a licence in which it sought a declaration that the decision was contrary to Article 30 of the Treaty and could not be justified under Article 36.
Ved to skrivelser af 17. august 1992 meddelte Secretary of State Evans og Macfarlan, at han ville give Generics tilladelse til at importere diacetylmorflnpartiet, idet han var af den opfattelse, at den politik, man hidtil havde ført, indebar en hindring for samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet, og at forsyningen kunne sikres på tilfredsstillende måde og i fuld overensstemmelse
By two letters of 17 August 1992 the Secretary of State informed Evans and Macfarlan that he was authorizing Generics to import the consignment of diamorphine as he considered that the policy then in force impeded intra-Community trade and that reliability of supplies could be satisfactorily guaranteed, in full compliance with
Produktet er omfattet af Enkelt Konvention af 1961 angående narkotiske nudler, der trådte i kraft i Det Forenede Kongerige i 1964, og som ligeledes er gældende i de øvrige medlemsstater.
Diamorphine is covered by the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs ('the Convention'), which entered into force in the United Kingdom in 1964 and which is also applicable in the other Member States.
med fællesskabsretten ved indførelse af en licitationsordning.
Community law, through the introduction of a tendering scheme.