natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolen besvarede de forelagte spørgsmål således:
The question was raised in connection with a dispute over a request for reimbursement of export refunds paid to GruSa.
Artikel 1 i Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2773/82 og nr. 1315/84 af henholdsvis den 13. oktober 1982 og den 11. maj 1984 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutionerne inden for oksekødssektoren, sammenholdt med pos. "ex 02.01 A II a) 4 ex bb)" ("udbenet, i stykker, hvert stykke emballeret for sig ... med undtagelse af slag ("Fleisch- und Knochendünnung") og skank") i bilaget til disse bestemmelser skal fortolkes således, at "Knochendünnung" i Tyskland på det for sagen relevante tidspunkt ikke indgik i de stykker oksekød, hvor hvilke der kunne udbetales eksport-
After having granted GruSa the export refund for the aforementioned consignments of beef and veal, the Hauptzollamt reclaimed the reimbursement of the disputed refunds on the ground that it had come to light that the consignments in question contained thin flank ("Knochendiinnung") which, according to the relevant Community rules, do not benefit from a refund.
Gennemgangen af det tredje spørgsmål har intet frembragt, der kan rejse tvivl om gyldigheden af de nævnte bestemmelser.
It appeared from various language versions of the provisions in question that the cut of meat excluded from the refund corresponded in other Member States essentially to "Fleischdünnung".
Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2891/84 af 15. oktober 1984 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutionerne inden for oksekødssektoren har ikke tilbagevirkende gyldighed."
A II (a) 4 ex (bb)" in the list annexed to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2787/81, that, notwithstanding the principle that provisions of Community it law should be interpreted uniformly, it was not a matter for the Court to give those terms a uniform Community definition, account having been taken in particular of the fact that the Community legislature had been aware of the differences in the exact meaning of the terms used but considered that they were of minor importance and did not justify modifying the existing practices and methods.
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse den 2. marts 1993.
In the absence of harmonization and of uniformity in the cutting and boning methods in the various Member States, the meaning of the terms used in the various language versions of the disputed regulation may therefore vary from one Member State to another, since, as in the present case, those differences are only of minor importance.
Han foreslog Domstolen at besvare spørgsmålene således:
The Court ruled as follows:
Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2773/82 af 13. oktober 1982 og (EØF) nr. 1315/84 af 11. maj 1984 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutioner inden for oksekødssektoren samt pos. ex 02.01 A II a) 4 ex bb) i bilaget til disse forordninger skal fortolkes således, at "Knochendünnung" i Tyskland i disse forordningers gyldighedsperiode ikke hører til de stykker oksekød, for hvilke der kan udbetales restitutioner.
Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2773/82 of 13 October 1982 and Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1315/84 of 11 May 1984, fixing the export refunds on beef and veal, in conjunction with subheading ex 02.01 A II (a) 4 ex (bb) ("boned or boneless, excluding the thin flanks (Fleischund KnochendünnunqK the shin and the shank, each piece individually wrapped") listed in the annex to those provisions, must be interpreted as meaning that in Germany Knochendiinnung was at the material time excluded from cuts of beef or veal eligible for export refunds.
Denne fortolkning med fører ikke, at de nævnte forordninger er en nul litet.
Consideration of the third question has not disclosed any factor capable of affecting the validity of the abovementioned provisions.
Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2891/84 af 15. oktober 1984 har ikke tilbagevirkende gyldighed."
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2891/84 of 15 October 1984 fixing the export refunds on beef and veal has no retroactive effect."
Tjenestemandssag "Forfremmelse - forfremmelsesprocedure" (Femte Afdeling)
Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting on 2 March 1993.
Ved stævning indleveret den 25. maj 1993 havde Den Franske Republik anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 685/93 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 859/89 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for generelle og særlige interventionsforanstaltninger for oksekød.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2773/82 of 13 October 1982 and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1315/84 of 11 May 1984 fixing export refunds on beef and veal and sub-headings ex 02.01 A II (a) and 4 ex(bb) annexed to those regulations must be interpreted as meaning that while those regulations were in force in Germany the "Knochendünnung" was not part of the animal for which refunds were payable.
Domstolens præsident bestemte:
That interpretation does not the nullity of the aforementioned regulations.
Afgørelsen om sagens omkostninger udsættes."
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2891/84 of 15 October 1984 has no retroactive effect."
16.7.1993 "Oksekød - fælles markedsordning - annullationssøgsmål - udsættelse af gennemførelsen"
(Beef and veal - Common organization of the markets - Application for annulment - Suspension of operation)
Ved stævning indleveret den 4. juni 1993 havde Irland anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 685/93 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 859/89 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for generelle og særlige interventionsforanstaltninger for oksekød.
By an application lodged at the Court Registry on 25 May 1993, the French Republic brought an action seeking the annulment of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 685/93 of 24 March 1993 amending Commission Regulation (EEC) No 859/89 laying down detailed rules for the application of general and special intervention measures in the beef and veal sector.
Ved særskilt dokument indleveret den 13. juni 1993 fremsatte Irland begæring om, at Domstolen traf afgørelse om udsættelse af gennemførelsen af den anfægtede forordning, indtil Domstolen har truffet afgørelse i hovedsagen.
By separate document lodged at the Court Registry on 10 June 1993, the French Republic also asked the Court for an order suspending the operation of the contested regulation until it has given judgment in the main proceedings.
Hvad angår de faktiske og retlige grunde til, at den foreløbige forholdsregel umiddelbart forekommer berettiget, anførte sagsøgeren blot, at sagen rejser vanskelige juridiske spørgsmål, som bør undersøges grundigt efter at være blevet diskuteret mellem parterne, og at begæringen ikke umiddelbart synes helt uberettiget.
As regards the existence of factual and legal grounds establishing a prima facie case for the interim measure, the Court observed that the application raised complex legal issues warranting detailed consideration after discussion involving all the parties and that the application did not appear prima facie to be devoid of all justification.
Den kan derfor ikke afvises med denne begrundelse.
Consequently, it could not be rejected on that ground.
Domstolen bemærkede, at sagsøgeren ikke i tilstrækkelig grad har sandsynliggjort, at der er risiko for en nedgang på oksekødsmarkedet i Irland i efteråret 1993 på grund af stivheden i opdrætningsmønsteret i landet, som forhindrer producenterne i at tilpasse sig de nye betingelser for intervention.
As regards the requirement for urgency, the applicant claims that the immediate application of measures limiting the weight of carcases eligible for intervention would cause in France, from the autumn of 1993, serious and irreparable damage to the whole of the category of producers of bovine animals intended for fattening and would entail equally serious and irreparable consequences for national town and country planning.
Hvis der opstår væsentlige problemer med at afsætte dette kød, vil situationen blive endnu vanskeligere med hensyn til kød af mindre god kvalitet, og det ikke blot på det irske marked, men i hele Fællesskabet. Kommissionen følger hele tiden markedssituationen og vil bestemt ikke vedvarende forholde sig passiv, idet den - som den selv har understreget - vil kunne foreslå en ændring af de anfægtede regler eller endog ophævelse heraf.
The Court noted that the whole of the applicant's arguments relied on a presumed economic conduct of farmers specializing in fattening bovine animals who, in anticipation of the consequences for the market of the weight limit on carcases eligible for intervention, would reduce their purchases of thin bovine animals.
En sådan beslutning vil kunne vedtages og træde i kraft inden for meget kort tid, da den træffes efter den såkaldte forvaltni ngskomitéprocedure.
It has not submitted elements which would allow to foresee such conduct with a sufficient degree of probability.
Domstolens præsident bestemte:
The President of the Court made the following order:
Afgørelsen om sagens omkostninger udsættes."
Case C-307/93 R Ireland ν Commission
Sag C-69/92: Kommissionen mod Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg og
By separate document lodged at the Court Registry on 13 June 1993, Ireland also asked the Court for an order suspending the operation of the contested regulation until it has given judgment in the main proceedings.
Sag C-73/92: Kommissionen mod Kongeriget Spanien
Consequently, it could not be rejected on that ground.
Traktatbrud - artikel 9, stk. 2, litra e), i direktiv 77/388/EØF, Rådets sjette direktiv om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter - Det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: ensartet beregningsgrundlag - begrebet "reklamevirksomhed"
As regards the requirement for urgency, the applicant referred to the serious and irreparable damage which producers of beef and veal in Ireland would sustain if the 380 kg weight limit on carcases eligible for intervention laid down by the contested regulation were to enter into force with effect from the first tendering procedure of July 1993.
Generaladvokat C. Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i sagerne C68/92, C-69/92 og C-73/92 i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 13. .iuli 1993.
The Court observed that the applicant had not established with a sufficient degree of probability that there was a risk that the market in beef and veal in Ireland will collapse in autumn 1993 owing to the rigidity of the cattle production cycle in that country preventing producers from adapting to the new intervention conditions.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. .juli 1993.
Case C-68/92 Commission ν French Republic and
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
Case C-69/92 Commission ν Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 85 og 86 sammenholdt med Traktatens artikel 3, litra f), og artikel 5 - nationale lovbestemmelser, som indeholder et forbud mod at yde fordele, der kan opgøres i penge, til andre personer end den mellemmand, i hvis forsikringsbeholdning den pågældende forsikring indgår.
Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Article 9(2)(e) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment - Concept of "advertising services"
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. juli 1993.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion on Cases C-68/92, C-69/92 and C-73/92 at the sitting of the Court on 13 July 1993
Han foreslog Domstolen følgende besvarelse:
He proposed that the Court should:
"Traktatens artikel 3, litra f), artikel 5, stk. 2, og artikel 85 skal fortolkes således, at de ikke er til hinder for, at der anvendes nationale regler, som indeholder et forbud mod i forbindelse med en forsikring at yde, tilbyde eller love kommission, returkommission eller anden fordel, der kan opgøres i penge, til andre personer end den mellemmand, i hvis forsikringsbeholdning den pågældende forsikring indgår, når der ikke foreligger adfærd fra virksomheders side, som er forbudt i henhold til artikel 85, stk. 1."
"declare that, by excluding a series of economic transactions from the concept of "advertising services" under Article 9(2)(e) of the Sixth VAT Directive, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; declare that, by excluding a series of economic transactions (in particular press conferences, seminars, cocktail parties, recreational sessions, and the hiring of areas for advertising) from the concept of "advertising services" under Article 9(2)(e) of the Sixth Directive, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; declare that, by instituting and maintaining a system of VAT for publicity activities which excludes certain services, such as promotions, from the concept of "advertising services" under Article 9(2)(e) of the Sixth VAT Directive, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; order the three Member States to pay the costs of the respective proceedings."
Sag C-185/91: Bundesanstalt für den Güterfernverkehr mod Rei ff GmbH & Co. KG Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 5, stk. 2, og artikel 85 - tyske lov bestemmelser om taksterne for fjerngodstransport ad landevej - procedure for fastsættelse af taksterne.
Interpretation of Articles 3(f), 5 and 85 of the EEC Treaty ­ Compatibility with Community law of provisions of German law prohibiting insurance agents from transferring part of their commission to the insured person.
Generaladvokat M. Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. juli 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 14 July 1993.
"EØF-Traktatens artikel 3, litra f), artikel 5 og 85 er ikke til hinder for, at der med henblik på fastsættelsen af taksterne for fjerngodstransport ad landevej i national lov gives kompetence til nogle nævn sammensat af medlemmer, der udnævnes af den offentlige myndighed efter forslag fra virksomheder eller sammenslutninger af virksomheder inden for den berørte sektor, når de pågældende nævns afgørelser skal opfylde visse kriterier, der fastsættes af den offentlige myndighed, og det herved præciseres, at hvis disse kriterier ikke opfyldes, bør nævnenes afgørelser ikke godkendes af myndigheden, der vil kunne sætte sin egen afgørelse i stedet for nævnets, og at nævnets afgørelser under alle omstændigheder vil kunne undergives domstolsprøvelse, idet der kan anlægges sag til prøvelse af beslutningen om godkendelse."
"Article 3(f), the second paragraph of Article 5 and Article 85(1) of the Treaty are to be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of a link with conduct of the undertakings prohibited under Article 85, they do not preclude the application of a national measure which, as in the present case, prohibits insurance intermediaries in the health insurance and legal expenses insurance sectors from transferring all or part of their commission." in het arrondissement Arnhem ν OHRA
Traktatbrud - EØF-Traktatens artikel 30, 52 og 59 og Rådets direktiv 77/62/EØF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved offentlige indkøb, som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 88/295/EØF - deltagelse i udbuddet vedrørende koncessionen på et system til automatisering af lotto-spillet forbeholdt offentlige virksomheder.
Interpretation of Articles 85 and 86 of the EEC Treaty in conjunction with Articles 3(f) and 5 of that Treaty ­ National law precluding the granting of financial advantages to persons other than the intermediary to whom the insurance portfolio belongs.
Generaladvokat C. Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. .juli 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 14 July 1993.
Han foreslog Domstolen,
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows:
"- at fastslå, at Den Italienske Republik har tilsidesat de forpligtelser, der påhviler den i henhold til EØF-Traktatens artikel 52 og 59 samt artikel 17-25 i Rådets direktiv 77/62/EØF af 21. december 1976 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved offentlige indkøb, som ændret ved Rådets direktiv 88/295/EØF, idet den i forbindelse med et udbud vedrørende et system til automatisering af det italienske lotto-spil bestemte, at alene institutioner, selskaber, konsortier og sammenslutninger, hvis kapital hver for sig eller samlet overvejende ejes af det offentlige, kunne deltage i udbuddet,
"Article 3(f), the second paraph of Article 5 and Article 85 of the Treaty must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude, in the absence of a connection with the conduct of undertakings prohibited by Article 85(1), the application of national legislation which prohibits granting, making available or promising in connection with an insurance policy a commission, a rebate or any other financial advantage to persons other than the intermediary to whom the insurance portfolio belongs."
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 119 - stillinger, der er forskellige (talepædagog og apoteker), men har samme værdi - lønforskel mellem stilling erne, hvoraf den ene overvejende beklædes af kvinder og den anden af mænd -lønforskel begrundet i de forskellige erhvervs særlige struktur og i de for skellige måder, overenskomstforhandlingerne gennemføres på - bevisbyrde for diskrimination.
"Articles 3(f), 5 and 85 of the EEC Treaty do not preclude that, in order to set tariffs for the long distance carriage of goods by road, national legislation should empower committees appointed by the public authority on proposal from undertakings or associations of undertakings of the sector concerned, provided that the decisions of those committees must take account of criteria laid down by the public authority, on the understanding that, if they are not observed, they must not be approved by that authority, they may be substituted by an administrative decision and, in any event, they may be subject to judicial review by means of an application before a court of law against the decision to approve."
Princippet om ligeløn, jf. EØF-Traktatens artikel 119, indebærer, at arbejdsgiveren objektivt skal begrunde lønforskellen mellem stilling A og stilling B.
Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Articles 30, 52 and 59 of the EEC Treaty and Council Directive 77/62/EEC coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts as amended by Council Directive 88/295/EEC - Reservation of the invitation to tender for the concession of a computerised lottery solely for public undertakings.
Såfremt arbejdsgiveren kan godtgøre, at der i perioder er en alvorlig mangel på egnede ansøgere til stilling B, og at han betaler en højere løn til ansatte i stilling B for at tiltrække ansøgere til stilling B, mens det på den anden side også kan bevises, at det kun er en del af lønforskellen mellem stilling B og stilling A, der skyldes behovet for at tiltrække egnede ansøgere til stilling B, er kun den del af forskellen, som skyldes behovet for at tiltrække egnede ansøgere til stilling B, objekt i vt begrundet."
"- declare that, by providing, in an invitation to tender concerning a computerization of the Italian lottery, that solely bodies, companies, consortia and groupings whose capital, considered individually or collectively, is mainly public owned, could participate in the invitation to tender, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 52 and 59 of the EEC Treaty as well as Articles 17 to 25 of Council Directive 77/62/EEC of 21 December 1976 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts, as amended by Council Directive 88/295/EEC; declare that, by failing to make known at the beginning of 1990, by means of an indicative notice, the total procurement by product area of which the estimated value is equal to or greater than ECU 750 000 and which the Ministry of Finance envisaged awarding during 1990 and by failing to publish, in November 1990, in the supplement to the Official Journal of the European Communities a notice inviting tenders for the
Traktatbrud - tilsidesættelse af artikel 8 og 9 i Rådets direktiv 83/189/EØF om en informationsprocedure med hensyn til tekniske standarder og forskrifter -manglende fremsendelse af udkast til dekret nr. 514 om lystbådes motorer.
Interpretation of Article 119 of the EEC Treaty - Performance of duties which are different (speech therapist and pharmacist) but of equal value -Difference of remuneration between those duties, one performed essentially by women and the other by men - Disparity in remuneration owing to the structures of each profession themselves and to the organization of different collective agreements - Burden of proof of discrimination.
Generaladvokat C. Gulmann fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 14. juli 1993.
Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 14 July 1993.
Generaladvokat G. Tesauro fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 14. juli 1993.
It is not sufficient justification for the difference in pay for the common employer to refer to the existence of different collective agreements even if, considered separately, neither discriminates on grounds of sex.
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse:
Case C-139/92 Commission ν Italian Republic
"Hverken EØF-Traktatens artikel 48 og 51 eller bestemmelserne i for ordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 er til hinder for anvendelse af artikel 2 i tillægsoverenskomst nr. 4 til overenskomsten af 29. marts 1951 mellem Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og Kongeriget Nederlandene om social sikring, hvorefter forsikringsperioder, som er tilbagelagt efter den tyske lovgivning af nederlandske statsborgere, der skulle udføre tvangsarbejde under Anden Verdenskrig, betragtes som om de var tilbagelagt efter lovgivningen i Nederlandene."
Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Infringement of Articles 8 and 9 of Council Directive 83/189/EEC of 28 March 1983 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical
Annullation af Kommissionens beslutning 91/523/EØF om afskaffelse af de italienske jernbaners nedsatte takster i forbindelse med transport af løst indladede mineraler og mineraler fremstillet og forarbejdet på Sicilien og Sardinien.
Standards and regulations - Failure to communicate, at the draft stage, the draft of the Decreto Ministeriale No 514 concerning engines for pleasure vessels.
Generaladvokat M. Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 14. iuli 1993.
Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Court on 14 July 1993.
"afvise sagen og pålægge sagsøgerne at betale sagens omkostninger."
(b) the Italian Republic should pay the costs."
Fortolkning af EØF-Traktatens artikel 5, 60 og 62 - lov om uddannelsesstøtte -ingen uddannelsesstøtte til studier ved en højere læreanstalt i en anden medlemsstat.
Interpretation of Articles 6, 7 and 8 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community - Applicability of Article 2 of the Fourth Additional Agreement of 21 December 1956 to the Convention of 29 March 1951 between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of the Netherlands (set out in Annex III to Regulation (EEC) 1408/71) -Settlement of rights acquired under German social insurance by Dutch workers between 13 May 1940 and 1 September 1945.
Generaladvokat M. Darmon fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 14. iuli 1993.
Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 14 July 1993.
Han foreslog følgende afgørelse:
He proposed that the Court should reply as follows: