natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det første forudsætter artikel 5, nr. 5, efter sin ordlyd på ingen måde, at de forpligtelser, en filial indgår, opfyldes i den kontraherende stat, hvor filialen er beliggende, for at de henhører under dens drift.
A branch, agency or other ancillary establishment within the meaning of Article 5(5) is therefore an entity capable of being the principal, or even exclusive, interlocutor for third parties in the negotiation of contracts.
Efter forhandlinger afgav Campenon Bernard ordren til den franske filial.
Campenon Bernard paid the invoice issued by the Spanish branch of Lloyd's Register, having been pressed to do so by the French branch, but without prejudice to its rights.
Selv om Lloyd's Register's spanske filial havde udstedt overensstemmelsescertifikater, afviste Ministeriet for Offentlige Arbejder i Kuwait betonstålet, fordi det ikke opfyldte den amerikanske tekniske norm.
Lloyd's Register pleaded that the French courts lacked jurisdiction.
For det andet ville den fortolkning, sagsøgeren i hovedsagen går ind for, bevirke, at artikel 5, nr. 5, ville miste næsten enhver praktisk betydning.
There does not necessarily have to be a close link between the entity with which a customer conducts negotiations and places an order and the place where the order will be performed.
Da sagsøgeren efter artikel 5, nr. 1, allerede kan indbringe en sag om kontraktforhold for retten på opfyldelsesstedet for den forpligtelse, der ligger til grund for sagen, ville artikel 5, nr. 5, overlappe denne bestemmelse, hvis den kun fandt anvendelse på de af filialen indgåede forpligtelser, som skal opfyldes i den kontraherende stat, hvor filialen er beliggende.
Accordingly, undertakings may form part of the operations of an ancillary establishment within the meaning of Article 5(5) of the Convention even though they are to be performed outside the Contracting State where it is situated, possibly by another ancillary establishment.
Efter en rykker fra Lloyd's Register's franske filial betalte Campenon Bernard den faktura, den spanske filial havde sendt til selskabet, men
Lloyd's Register contends that the Court has held that the rule set out in Article 5(5) applies to actions relating to undertakings which have been entered into by the branch in the name of the parent body, provided that they are to be performed in the Contracting State of the ancillary establishment.
opfyldelsesstedet for den omtvistede forpligtelse befinder sig i den kontraherende stat, hvor filialen er beliggende, men i en anden retskreds.
his domicile because there is a specially close connecting factor between the dispute and the court with jurisdiction to resolve it.
Der er imidlertid ikke nødvendigvis en snæver forbindelse mellem den enhed, som en kunde forhandler med og afgiver sin ordre til, og det sted, hvor ordren effektueres.
That interpretation is, moreover, in conformity with the objective of the special rules of jurisdiction.
I øvrigt er denne fortolkning i overensstemmelse med formålet med de specielle kompetenceregler. Disse regler giver nemlig sagsøgeren mulighed for at indbringe sagen for andre retter end retterne i den stat, hvor sagsøgte har bopæl, som følge af, at der er en særlig snæver forbindelse mellem retstvisten og den ret, der er kompetent til at afgøre den.
'The expression "dispute arising out of the operations of a branch, agency or other establishment" in Article 5(5) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, does not presuppose that the undertakings in question entered into by the branch in the name of its parent body are to be performed in the Contracting State in which the branch is established.'
Domstolen besvarede det forelagte spørgsmål således :
He proposed the following reply:
»Begrebet 'i sager vedrørende driften af en filial, et agentur eller en lignende virksomhed...' i artikel 5, nr. 5, i konventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgerlige sager, herunder handelssager, som ændret ved konventionen af 9. oktober 1978 om Kongeriget Danmarks, Irlands og Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritanniens og Nordirlands tiltrædelse, forudsætter ikke, at de forpligtelser, en filial har påtaget sig i hovedvirksomhedens navn, skal opfyldes i den kontraherende stat, hvor filialen er beliggende.*
'The expression "as regards a dispute arising out of the operations of a branch, agency or other establishment..." in Article 5(5) of the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters does not entail any requirement that the obligations undertaken by a branch (...) in the name of the parent company are to be performed in the Contracting State in which the branch ... is situated.'
Generaladvokat M.B. Elmer fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 21. februar 1995.
Case C-299/93 Ernst Bauer ν Commission of the European Communities Institutional Law
Han foreslog følgende besvarelse :
Determination of the rent
»Udtrykket 'i sager vedrørende driften af en filial, et agentur eller en lignende virksomhed ..." i artikel 5, nr. 5, i Bruxelles-konventionen af 27. september 1968 om retternes kompetence og om fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser i borgerlige sager, herunder handelssager, indebærer ikke noget krav om, at de forpligtelser, en filial mv. har påtaget sig i hovedvirksomhedens navn, skal opfyldes i den kontraherende stat, hvor filialen mv. er beliggende.«
(Arbitration clause Residential tenancy Termination - Restitution of damage) (Second Chamber) arbitration clause agreed pursuant to Article 153 of the EAEC Treaty for a declaration that the request for surrender of tenanted residential premises and the increase in the rent payable for those premises were unlawful, and for
Sag C-299/93 Ernst Bauer / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Regler for institutionerne
compensation for the additional rent paid on the basis of that increase and for material and non- material damage incurred as a result of the early surrender of the premises.
Sagsøgte frifindes.
Dismissed the application;
Sagsøgeren betaler sagens omkostninger.*
Ordered the applicant to pay the costs.'
Generaladvokat G. Kosmas fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling') den 7. februar 1995.
Advocate General Cosmas delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 7 February 1995.
»1) fastslog, at Kommissionens opsigelse af lejekontrakten var ulovlig.
Declare unlawful the termination of the tenancy agreement by the Commission.
2) frifandt Kommissionen for sagsøgerens øvrige påstande.
Reject the remainder of the applicant's claims.
Sag C-325/93 Union nationale des mutualités socialistes / Aldo Del Grosso Fri bevægelighed for personer
It is therefore necessary to determine whether the benefits in question are of the same kind, whether they each represent benefits 'in respect of invalidity, old age, death (pensions) or occupational disease' and, lastly, whether they are awarded in accordance with Articles 46, 50, 51 or 60(l)(b) of Regulation No 1408/71.
Præjudiciel »Kumulation af sociale ydelser —fortolkning (Anden Afdeling) forsikringsperioder og forholdsmæssig beregning af ydelser.
It must thus be ascertained, first, whether the Belgian primary incapacity allowance and the Italian benefits are benefits of the same kind.
Ved dom af 17. juni 1993 indgået til Domstolen den 24. s.m. har Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles forelagt en række præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet (EFT 1971 II, s. 366, herefter benævnt »forordning nr. 1408/71«).
As the defendant in the main action has himself acknowledged, his entitlement to Italian invalidity benefit was acquired on the basis of his having been covered by the Italian and Belgian schemes consecutively, and thus in accordance with the system of aggregation of insurance periods and apportionment of benefits.
Det forhold, at de nævnte ydelser senere blev forhøjet med et tillæg, således at ydelsesbeløbet nåede op på minimumsbeløbet i henhold til italiensk lovgivning, er uden sammenhæng med den anvendte beregningsmetode og er derfor uden betydning for, hvorledes ydelserne må kvalificeres.
The fact that that benefit may subsequently have been increased by a supplement in order to reach the minimum benefit provided for by Italian legislation is irrelevant to the method in which it was calculated, and therefore to its classification.
Spørgsmålene er blevet rejst under en sag, som Union nationale des mutualités socialistes har anlagt mod Aldo Del Grosso, der er italiensk statsborger.
As far as the Belgian benefit is concerned, it should be noted that it is based on the materialization of a risk and that its purpose is to compensate for the financial loss resulting from incapacity for work attributable to sickness.
Den forelæggende retsinstans ønsker oplyst, hvorvidt den som »invalidepension« betegnede italienske sociale ydelse skal anses for en »selvstændig ydelse« i henhold til artikel 46, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 1408/71.
As regards the main Italian benefit, it is common ground that it is an invalidity pension calculated by applying the system of aggregation of insurance periods and apportionment of benefits. It cannot, therefore, be regarded as being of the same kind as the Belgian benefit described above.
Det fremgår af Domstolens praksis, at der ved en »selvstændig ydelse« skal forstås en ydelse, hvis størrelse er fastsat på grundlag af den samlede varighed af de forsikrings- eller bopælsperioder, der skal tages i betragtning i henhold til den for den kompetente institution gældende nationale lovgivning, uden at der herved tages hensyn til perioder tilbagelagt efter de lovgivninger i andre medlemsstater, som den pågældende har været omfattet af.
The national court is essentially seeking to know whether Community law prevents the application of a national rule against the overlapping of benefits if a migrant worker receives in one Member State benefits for incapacity for work resulting from sickness and in another Member State an invalidity benefit calculated by aggregation of insurance periods and apportionment of benefits, increased by a supplement intended to guarantee him the minimum national pension.
Spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt nationale antikumulationsbestemmelser kan finde anvendelse, er reguleret i artikel 12, stk. 2, i forordning nr. 1408/71.
The application of national rules against the overlapping of benefits is governed by Article 12(2) of Regulation No 1408/71.
Som Del Grosso selv har erkendt det, udsprang hans ret til de italienske ydelser i anledning af invaliditet af, at han havde været omfattet af såvel den italienske som den belgiske ordning, således at retten som grundlag havde en anvendelse af ordningen med sammenlægning af
As far as the other two requirements referred to above are concerned, the Belgian primary incapacity allowance received by the defendant in the main action is a sickness allowance constituting a 'cash benefit' within the meaning of Article 19 et seq. of Chapter I in Title III of Regulation No 1408/71 and is calculated in accordance with Article 23 of that regulation.
Der gælder dog visse undtagelser til delte princip om anvendelse af antikumulationsbestemmelser.
There are a number of exceptions to that principle, however.
Princippet gælder således ikke i tilfælde, hvor den pågældende oppebærer ydelser af samme art i form af ydelser i anledning af invaliditet, alderspensionsydelser, ydelser i anledning af
It does not apply when the person concerned receives benefits of the same kind in respect of invalidity, old age, death or occupational disease which are awarded by the institutions of two or more Member States in accordance with Articles 46, 50, 51 or 60(l)(b).
dødsfald eller ydelser i anledning af erhvervssygdom, der er fastsat af institutionerne i to eller flere medlemsstater i overensstemmelse med artikel 46, 50 og 51 eller artikel 60, stk. 1, litra b).
An invalidity benefit such as the Italian 'invalidity pension' L· not an independent benefit within the meaning of Article 46(1) of Council Regulation No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community inasmuch as it is calculated in accordance with the system of aggregation of insurance periods and apportionment of benefits.
Hvad angår den grundlæggende italienske ydelse er det ubestridt, at denne er en invalidepensionsydelse, hvis beregningsgrundlag er ordningen med sammenlægning af forsikringsperioder og forholdsmæssig beregning af ydelser. Disse former for ydelser kan derfor ikke anses for at være af samme art som de belgiske ydelser.
Article 12(2) of Regulation No 1408/71, cited above, does not preclude the application of a national rule against overlapping benefits where a migrant worker receives in a Member State benefits intended to compensate for loss of income as a result of incapacity for work due to sickness and in another Member State an invalidity benefit calculated by aggregating insurance periods and apportioning benefits, increased by a pension supplement intended to guarantee him the minimum national pension.
Det må herefter undersøges, om de pågældende ydelser er af samme art, om der i begge tilfælde er tale om ydelser »ved invaliditet, alderdom, dødsfald (pensioner) eller erhvervssygdom«, og endelig om ydelserne kan anses for fastsat i overensstemmelse med artikel 46, 50 og 51 eller artikel 60, stk. 1, litra b), i forordning nr. 1408/71.
For the purposes of applying national rules against the overlapping of benefits it is for the national court to classify the benefits in question in accordance with the applicable national legislation, taking into account the rules relating to conflict of laws, since the Community rules are not relevant.'
Det må ligeledes fastslås, at tillægget til den italienske pension heller ikke kan anses for at være en ydelse af samme art som den belgiske ydelse.
Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Second Chamber on 27 April 1994.
Hvad angår de to yderligere betingelser, der er nævnt ovenfor, bemærkes, at de belgiske »foreløbige ydelser ved uarbejdsdygtighed«, som Del Grosso har oppebåret, er ydelser i anledning af sygdom i form af »kontantydelser«, jf. artikel 19 ff. i forordning nr. 1408/71, der er indeholdt i kapitel 1 i forordningens afsnit III, og at størrelsen af disse ydelser beregnes på grundlag af forordningens artikel 23.
Ί) As far as concerns benefits granted in accordance with Regulation No 1408/71, the term "independent benefit" is used to mean the benefit calculated in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 46(1), namely the full benefit provided for by the legislation of the Member State of the competent institution, under that legislation alone and without taking into account periods completed under the legislation of other Member States to which the person concerned has been subject.
Ydelserne er dermed ikke ydelser i anledning af invaliditet, alderspensionsydelser, ydelser i anledning af dødsfald eller ydelser i anledning af erhvervssygdom fastsat i overensstemmelse med artikel 46, 50 og 51 eller artikel 60, stk. 1, litra b).
Consequently, that term may not be used to mean an Italian social security benefit called "invalidity benefit", even supplemented in order to take it up to the level of the minimum pension provided for by the Italian legislation, since that benefit was originally calculated in accordance with the system of aggregation of insurance periods and apportionment.
Artikel 12, stk 2, i forordning nr. 1408/71 er ikke til hinder for en anvendelse af en national antikunudationsbestemmelse i tilfælde, hvor en vandrende arbejdstager i én medlemsstat der skyldes medlemsstat oppebærer ydelser, som har til formål at kompensere for et indtægtstab, uarbejdsdygtighed som følge af sygdom, og samtidig i en anden oppebærer ydelser i anledning af invaliditet, hvis beregningsgrundlag er en sammenlægning af forsikringsperioder og en forholdsmæssig beregning af ydelser, og som forhøjes med et tillæg, således at ydelsesbeløbet til den pågældende når oppå et beløb svarende til den nationale minimumspension.
2) The first sentence of Article 12(2) of Regulation No 1408/71 does not preclude the application of an anti-overlapping provision in national legislation under which a migrant worker receives cash benefits in respect of sickness, intended to compensate for the loss of income suffered by reason of unfitness for work due to sickness, where he also receives an invalidity benefit in another Member State, awarded in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation No 1408/71 and whether or not increased by a supplement set by the legislation of that other Member State in order to bring it up to the level of the minimum pension provided for by that legislation.'
Ved anvendelsen af nationale antikumulationsregler henhører det under den forelæggende retsinstans at kvalificere de pågældende ydelser i henhold til national lovgivning, hvorved den forelæggende retsinstans skal tage hensyn til lowalgsregler, idel de fællesskabsretlige bestemmelser ikke er relevante.*
Preliminary ruling (Agriculture — Control of classical swine fever been slaughtered) (Third Chamber) the light of Article 2(l)(f) of Council Decision 80/1097/EEC of 11 November 1980 on financial aid from the Community for the eradication of African swine fever in Sardinia according to which the plans for the eradication of swine fever must provide for 'immediate and total compensation for owners whose pigs have been slaughtered under the plan'.
Generaladvokat W. Van Gerven fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling)') den 27. april 1994.
By order of 26 May 1993, received at the Court Registry on 14 June 1993, the Rechtbank van Eerste Aanleg (Court of First Instance), Ghent (Belgium), referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling two questions on the interpretation and validity of Commission Decision 88/529/EEC of 7 October 1988 approving the plan for the eradication of classical swine fever presented by the Kingdom of Belgium.
»1.1 forbindelse med pensioner tilkendt på grundlag af bestemmelserne i forordning nr. 1408/71 betegner udtrykket 'selvstændig ydelse' en ydelse beregnet på grundlag af artikel 46, stk. 1, første punktum, dvs. en ydelse, der er udtryk for en fuldstændig pension efter lovgivningen i den medlemsstat, som den kompetente institution henhører under, udelukkende ved anvendelse af denne lovgivning og uden sammenlægning af forsikringsperioder tilbagelagt efter de lovgivninger i andre medlemsstater, som den pågældende arbejdstager har været omfattet af.
Those questions arose in proceedings brought by the agricultural cooperative Flip CV ('Flip') and the company O. Verdegem NV ('Verdegem') against the Belgian State concerning the compensation they consider payable to them by reason of the slaughter of pigs which they owned by order of the Belgian health authorities acting under measures to control classical swine fever. The dispute relates both to the amount of compensation due and the payment of default interest.
Følgelig kan begrebet ikke omfatte en som 'invalidepension' betegnet italiensk social ydelse, uanset om der ydes et tillæg til denne med henblik på at nå op på minimumspensionsbeløbet i henhold til italiensk lovgivning, når ydelsen som udgangspunkt er blevet beregnet på grundlag af ordningen med sammenlægning af forsikringsperioder og forholdsmæssig beregning.
Their applications are founded on Article 15(1) of the Royal Decree of 10 September 1981 laying down health inspection measures concerning classical swine fever and African swine fever.
Sag C-315/93 Flip CV og O. Verdegem NV / Den belgiske stat Landbrug
The Belgian State maintained before the national court that that article required only payment of compensation, excluding any default interest, within the limits of the available budgetary appropriations.
Præjudiciel »Landbrug — bekæmpelse af klassisk svinepest — erstatning til ejere, hvis svin er blevet slået ned* (Tredje Afdeling)
Flip and Verdegem objected that the Royal Decree of 10 September 1981 should be interpreted in the light of Community legislation on control of swine fever and, in particular, in
Kommissionens beslutning 88/529/EØF af 7. oktober 1988 om godkendelse af den af Kongeriget Belgien forelagte plan for udryddelse af klassisk svinepest.
apparent either from the scheme or from the wording of the directives and decisions in that field.
80/1097 ikke også skal omfatte beslutning 88/529, vil dette føre til en forskelsbehandling af belgiske producenter, hvilket er i strid med traktatens artikel 7.
Finally, it should be pointed out that Article 2(l)(c) of Decision 90/217, which requires the Italian Republic to draw up a new plan for the eradication of African swine fever in Sardinia, lays down the principle only of 'immediate and adequate' compensation for the owners concerned.
De præjudicielle spørgsmål må fortolkes således, at de mere generelt går ud på, om fællesskabsbestemmelserne om bekæmpelse af klassisk svinepest i deres helhed skal fortolkes således, at de foreskriver, at der skal gives fuldstændig og øjeblikkelig erstatning til producenter, hvis svin er blevet slået ned efter de nationale myndigheders bestemmelse, og, såfremt dette ikke er tilfældet, om disse bestemmelser skal anses for forenelige med forbuddet mod forskelsbehandling i EØF-traktatens artikel 7, nu EF-traktatens artikel 6.
By adopting Directives 80/217 and 80/1095, the Community legislature merely intended to lay down sanitary and preventive measures which the Member States are required to take in order to prevent and eliminate classical swine fever from their territory.
Disse spørgsmål er blevet rejst under en tvist mellem på den ene side landbrugsandelsforeningen Flip CV (herefter benævnt »Flip«) og selskabet O. Verdegem NV (herefter benævnt »Verdegem«) og på den anden side den belgiske stat vedrørende den erstatning, som de mener at have krav på som følge af, at svin, som de var ejere af, var blevet slået ned efter de belgiske sundhedsmyndigheders bestemmelse som led i foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af klassisk svinepest. Tvisterne vedrører både de skyldige erstatningers størrelse og spørgsmålet om betaling af morarenter.
In the absence of Community provisions on the matter, compensation of owners whose pigs have been slaughtered by order of the national authorities under measures to control classical swine fever falls within the competence of each Member State.
Fortolkningen af fællesskabsbestemmelserne
Validity of the Community rules
Sagsøgernes krav er baseret på bestemmelserne i artikel 15, stk. 1, i den belgiske kongelige anordning af 10. september 1981 om veterinærpolitimæssige foranstaltninger vedrørende klassisk svinepest og afrikansk svinepest.
The national court nonetheless has doubts concerning the validity of the Community rules in view of the principle that there should be no discrimination on grounds of nationality laid down in Article 7 of the Treaty.
Et princip om erstatning til ejere, hvis svin er blevet slået ned som led i foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af klassisk svinepest, fremgår hverken af opbygningen eller ordlyden af de direktiver og beslutninger, der er udstedt på dette område.
The Community rules on control of classical swine fever do not disregard the principle of non discrimination laid down in that article.
For den nationale ret har den belgiske stat anført, at denne artikel kun pålagde betaling af en erstatning, men ikke af morarenter, og kun inden for de givne budgetbevillinger.
Decision 80/1096 does indeed introduce Community financial aid for Member States which have, in particular, incurred costs in compensating owners whose animals have been slaughtered or destroyed under measures to control classical swine fever.