natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen bærer en femtedel af sine egne omkostninger.«
The defendant shall bear one-fifth of its own costs.'
Sag T-138/94 COCKERILL-SAMBRE SA / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber EKSF
Case T-138/94 COCKERILL-SAMBRE SA ν Commission of the European Communities ECSC
»EKSF-traktaten — konkurrence — aftaler mellem virksomheder, vedtagelser inden for virksomheders organisationer og forskellige former for samordnet praksis — fastsættelse af priser — opdeling af markeder — informationsudvekslingsordninger« (Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
(ECSC Treaty — Competition —Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices — Price-fixing — Market sharing — Systems for the exchange of information) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
2) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i beslutning 94/215/EKSF, fastsættes til et beløb på 3 580 000 EURO.
Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 4 of Decision 94/215/ECSC at EUR 3 580 000;
Kornmissionen bærer en femtedel af sine egne omkostninger.«
The defendant shall bear one-fifth of its own costs.'
Sag T-141/94 Thyssen Stahl AG / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber EKSF
Case T-141/94 Thyssen Stahl AG ν Commission of the European Communities ECSC
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
The Decision contains the following operative part:
»1) Artikel 1 i Kommissionens beslutning 94/215/EKSF af 16 februar 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 vedrørende aftaler og forskellige former for samordnet praksis mellem europæiske producenter af stålbjælker annulleres, for så vidt som sagsøgeren heri beskyldes for at have deltaget i en aftale om fastsættelse af priser på det tyske marked i en periode på tre måneder.
The following undertakings have participated, to the extent described in this Decision, in the anti­competitive practices listed under their names which prevented, restricted and distorted normal competition in the common market. Where fines are imposed, the duration of the infringement is given in months except in the case of the harmonisation of extras where participation in the infringement is indicated by "χ".
2) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i beslutning 94/215, fastsættes til et beløb på 4 400 000 EURO.
In 1989/1990 it had a turnover of DM 8.241 billion. Its sales of beams within the Community in 1990 amounted to DM 187.5 million (ECU 91 million).
3) I øvrigt frifindes Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
Price fixing in the German market (3)
4) Sagsøgeren bærer sine egne sagsomkostninger samt halvdelen af Kommissionens omkostninger.
They are: NMH Stahlwerke GmbH ('NMH'), in Case T­134/94; the trade association Eurofer ASBL ('Eurofer'), in Case T­136/94; ARBED SA ('ARBED'), in Case T­137/94; Cockerill­Sambre SA ('Cockerill­Sambre'), in Case T­138/94; Unimétal ­ Société française des aciers longs SA ('Unimétal'), in Case T­145/94; Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG ('Krupp
Kommissionen bærer halvdelen af sine egne omkostninger.«
Price fixing in the Italian market (3)
»EKSF-traktaten — konkurrence — aftaler mellem virksomheder, vedtagelser inden for virksomheders organisationer og forskellige former for samordnet praksis — fastsættelse af priser — opdeling af markeder — informationsudvekslingsordninger« (Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
The claim for annulment of Article 1 of the Decision
Jf. dommen i sag T-141/94
(h) Market sharing, Italy (3)
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Harmonisation of extras (χ)
2) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i beslutning 94/215/EKSF, fastsættes til et beløb på 8 300 000 EURO.
Eurofer has infringed Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty by organising an exchange of confidential information in connection with the infringements committed by its members and listed in Article 1.
3) I øvrigt frifindes Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
Article 3
4) Sagsøgeren bærer sine egne sagsomkostninger samt halvdelen af Kommissionens omkostninger.
The undertakings and associations of undertakings mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 shall henceforth bring to an end the infringements referred to in Articles 1 and 2 to the extent that they have not already done so.
Kommissionen bærer halvdelen af sine egne omkostninger.«
For the infringements described in Article 1 which took place after 30 June 1988 (31 December 1989 ' in the case of Aristrain and Ensidesa) the following fines are imposed:
»EKSF-traktaten — konkurrence — aftaler mellem virksomheder —fastsættelse af priser — informationsudvekslingsordning« (Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
The Commission has provided adequate reasons showing both the existence of the agreements and concerted practices with which the applicant is charged and the applicant's individual involvement in those agreements and concerted practices and that the Commission has provided a sufficient description of the infringements in question.
Det hedder i domskonklusionen:
Analysis of the conduct in question in relation to the criterion of 'normal competition'
»1) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i Kornmissionens beslutning 94/215/EKSF af 16. februar 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 vedrørende aftaler og forskellige former for samordnet praksis mellem europæiske producenter af stålbjælker, fastsættes til et beløb på 9 000 EURO.
At this stage in the reasoning, it is appropriate to consider the Commission's legal analysis of the conduct alleged in recitals 224 to 237 of the Decision in relation to: (a) the categories of agreements covered by Article 65(1) of the Treaty; (b) the purpose or effect of such conduct; and (c) the concept of normal competition, within the meaning of that provision.
2) I øvrigt frifindes Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
It follows that the arguments against characterising the conduct of which the applicant is accused as agreements or concerted practices to fix target prices, as the Commission does in recitals 224 to 237 of the Decision, must be rejected in their entirety.
3) Sagsøgeren bærer sine egne sagsomkostninger samt halvdelen af Kommissionens omkostninger.
According to the Court of First Instance, the applicant has not established that there was an error of law in the analysis of the conduct in question in relation to the concepts of 'agreements' or 'concerted practices' covered by Article 65(1) of the Treaty.
Kommissionen bærer halvdelen af sine egne omkostninger.«
Article 1 of the Decision must consequently be annulled in so far as that charge is concerned.
Sag T-148/94 Preussag Stahl AG / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber EKSF
The Commission was therefore correct in holding, in recital 222 of the Decision, that it was not obliged, in order to establish an infringement of Article 65(1) of the Treaty, to demonstrate that there was an adverse effect on competition.
»EKSF-traktaten — konkurrence — aftaler mellem virksomheder, vedtagelser inden for virksomheders organisationer og forskellige former for samordnet praksis — fastsættelse af priser — opdeling af markeder — informatiomudvekslingsordninger«
On the assumption that the price agreements concluded within the Eurofer/Scandinavia group •during 1986, 1987 and 1988 were concluded under the arrangements limiting trade between the Community and the Scandinavian countries and that the Commission and/or the
(Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
This matter will be taken into consideration by the Court when fixing the fine.
Jf. dommen i sag T-141/94
Misuse of powers
»1) Artikel 1 i Kornmissionens beslutning 94/215/EKSF af 16 februar 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 vedrørende aftaler og forskellige former for samordnet praksis mellem europatiskeproducenter af stålbjælker annulleres, for så vidt som sagsøgeren heri beskyldes for at have deltaget i en aftale om fastsættelse af priser på det tyske marked i en periode på tre måneder.
Absence of fault on the applicant's part, infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, and failure to adopt transitional measures following the end of the manifest crisis regime
2) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i beslutning 94/215, fastsættes til et beløb på 8 600 000 EURO.
Likewise, the Court's examination has not revealed any deficient statement of reasons, in particular with regard to the role which the applicant played in the infringements.
3) I øvrigt frifindes Kornmissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
It follows that those arguments must be rejected in their entirety.
4) Sagsøgeren bærer sine egne sagsomkostninger samt fire femtedele af Kommissionens omkostninger.
According to the Court of First Instance, the arguments based on the applicant's good faith, infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and failure to adopt transitional measures after 30 June 1988 must be dismissed.
Kommissionen bærer en femtedel af sine egne omkostninger.«
The Commission's involvement in the infringements of which the applicant is accused
»EKSF-traktaten — konkurrence — aftaler mellem virksomheder, vedtagelser inden for virksomheders organisationer og forskellige former for samordnet praksis — fastsættelse af priser — opdeling af markeder — ΐ^ο?τηαίίοη5^ν€^ί^5θΓάηΐ^εΓ« (Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
The Court concludes that, from 1988 on, the steel undertakings and their trade association Eurofer submitted to the Commission relatively general and imprecise information, whilst engaging, in support of their agreements in restraint of competition, in very precise and detailed discussions, individualised at the level of the undertakings, the existence and content of which they hid from both DG III and DG IV.
»1) Artikel 1 i Kommissionens beslutning 94/215/EKSF af 16. februar 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 vedrørende aftaler og forskellige former for samordnet praksis mellem europæiske producenter af stålbjælker annulleres, for så vidt som sagsøgeren heri beskyldes for at have deltaget i en aftale om opdeling af det italienske marked i en periode på tre måneder.
It follows that, in so far as the increase in the fine imposed on the applicant, in particular, was based on the consideration that the Commission had already penalised it for similar infringements in the Stainless Steel decision, the Decision is vitiated by an error of law, since that fact cannot be taken into account as an aggravating circumstance in relation to infringements committed before the Stainless Steel decision was adopted.
2) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i beslutning 94/215, fastsættes til et beløb på 20 000 000 EURO.
Furthermore, the Decision makes no reference to the statement of objections in the Stainless Steel case.
3) I øvrigt frifindes Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
The Court finds that the Commission was justified in including, in the operative part of the Decision, the injunction contained in Article 3, given, in particular, that the applicant has contested the infringements concerned and not given an undertaking not to repeat its anticompetitive conduct.
4) Sagsøgeren bærer sine egne omkostninger samt halvdelen af Kommissionens omkostninger. Kommissionen bærer halvdelen af sine egne omkostninger.«
It follows that Article 4 of the Decision must be annulled to the extent to which it imposed on the applicant an increase in the fine for the recidivist nature of its conduct.
Sag T-156/94 Siderúrgica Aristrain Madrid, SL / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber EKSF
The claim for annulment of Article 3 of the operative part of the Decision must therefore be dismissed.
Jf. dommen i sag T-141/94
The economic situation of the applicant and in the steel industry
•1) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i Kommissionens beslutning 94/215 af 16. februar 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 vedrørende aftaler og forskellige former for samordnet praksis mellem europæiske producenter af stålbjælker, fastsættes til et beløb på 7100 000 EURO.
The Court is of the opinion that, in recital 303 of the Decision, the Commission exaggerated the economic impact of the price-fixing agreements found here, as compared with the competition which would have existed had it not been for such infringements, having regard to the favourable economic climate and the latitude given to undertakings to conduct general discussions on price forecasts, between themselves and with DG III, in the context of meetings organised by DG III on a regular basis.
2) I øvrigt frifindes Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
The Court holds, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction, that the fine imposed on the applicant for the various price-fixing agreements and concerted practices should be reduced by 15%. On the other hand, it finds that there are
3) Sagsøgeren bærer sine egne sagsomkostninger samt tre fjerdedele af Kornmissionens omkostninger, herunder omkostningerne i forbindelse med sagen om foreløbige forholdsregler.
'A. Anmds Article 1 of Commission Decision 94/215/ECSC of 16 February 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty concerning agreements and concerted practices engaged in by European producers of beams in so far as it finds that the applicant participated in a price-fixing agreement on the German market which lasted three months;
Kommissionen bærer en fjerdedel af sine egne omkostninger.«
B. Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 4 of Decision 94/215/ECSC at EUR 4 400 000;
»EKSF-traktaten — konkurrence — aftaler mellem virksomheder, vedtagelser inden for virksomheders organisationer og forskellige former for samordnet praksis — fastsættelse af priser — opdeling af markeder — inform.ationsudvekslingsordninger« (Anden Udvidede Afdeling)
D. Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay half of the defendant shall bear half of its own costs.'
»1) Den bøde, der er pålagt sagsøgeren ved artikel 4 i Kommissionens beslutning 94/215/EKSF af16. februar 1994 om en procedure i henhold til EKSF-traktatens artikel 65 vedrørende aftaler og forskellige former for samordnet praksis mellem europæiske producenter af stålbjælker, fastsættes til et beløb på 3 350 000 EURO.
(FCSC Treaty — Competition —Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations oj .ndertakings and concerted practices — Price-fixing — Market sharing — Systems for the exchange of information) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
Kommissionen bærer en fjerdedel af sine egne omkostninger.«
Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decision 94/215/ECSC of 16 February 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty concerning agreements and concerted practices engaged in by European producers of beams in so far as it finds that
Sag T-257/97 Hans C. Herold / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Tjenestemandsvedtægten
the applicant participated in an agreement to share the Italian market which lasted three months;
11. marts 1999
Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 4 of Decision 94/215/ECSC at EUR 8 300 000;
Sag T-66/98 Giuliana Gaspari / Europa-Parlamentet Tj enestemandsvedtægten
Case T-147/94 Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG ν Commission of the European Communities ECSC
»Tjenestemænd — badekur — afslag på forhåndstilladelse til godtgørelse af udgifterne hertil — begrundelse — lægeerklæring — beskyttelse af privatlivets fred« (Fjerde Afdeling)
(ECSC Treaty — Competition -Agreements between undertakings—Price-fixing—Systemsfor the exchange of information) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
Appel af dom afsagt af Retten (Fjerde Afdeling) den 19. marts 1998 i sag T-74/96, Tzoanos mod Kommissionen — frifindelse for påstand på annullation af en foranstaltning vedrørende
Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay half of the defendant's costs. The defendant shall bear half of its own costs.'
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
Case T-148/94 Preussag Stahl AG ν Commission of the European Communities ECSC
Tyskland / Europæiske
11 March 1999
Generaladvokat D. Ruiz-Jarabo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 11. marts 1999.
Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decision 94/215/ECSC of 16 February 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty concerning agreements and concerted practices engaged in by European producers of beams in sofaras it finds that the applicant participated in a price-fixing agreement on the Danish market for a period of three months;
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den 9. marts 1999.
Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 4 of Decision 94/215/ECSC at EUR 8 600 000;
Europa-Parlamentet / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union
The defendant shall bear one-fifth of its own costs. '
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Domstolens plenum) den 11. marts 1999.
Case T-151/94 British Steel pic ν Commission of the European Communities ECSC
Sag C­209/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Rådet for Den Europæiske Union
(ECSC Treaty - Competition -Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices - Price-fixing - Market sharing - Systems for the exchange of information) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Anden Afdeling) den 11. marts 1999.
Sets the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by Article 4 of Decision 94/215/ECSC at EUR 20 000 000;
Generaladvokat J. Mischo fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Sjette Afdeling) den li­mans 1999.
Case T-156/94 Siderúrgica Aristrain Madrid, SL v Commission of the European Communities ECSC
Generaladvokat F.G. Jacobs fremsatte forslag til afgørelse i retsmødet (Femte Afdeling) den 11. marts 1999.
(ECSC Treaty — Competition —Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices — Price-fixing — Market sharing — Systems for the exchange of information) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
Dansk tekst foreligger endnu ikke.
See Case T-141/94
Offentliggørelsen af dommene i »stålbjælkesagerne« (dommene i sagerne Thyssen Stahl AG m.fl. mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber)
Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the defendant's costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.
På grund af ligheden mellem sagerne vil dommene undtagelsesvis ikke blive offentliggjort med den fulde ordlyd.
Case T-157/94 Empresa Nacional Siderúrgica, SA (Ensidesa) ν Commission of the European Communities ECSC
Den fulde ordlyd af en repræsentativ dom i »stålbjælkesagerne« (dommen i sagen Thyssen mod Kommissionen, sag T-141/94) vil være til rådighed på alle de officielle fællesskabssprog.
(ECSC Treaty — Competition —Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices — Price-fixing — Market sharing — Systems for the exchange of information) (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
Denne publikation udarbejdes af Domstolens Presse- og Informationsafdeling (L-2925 Luxembourg) med henblik på en hurtig orientering om arbejdet ved Domstolen og Retten i Første Instans.
Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the defendant's costs. The defendant shall bear one-quarter of its own costs. '
Dommene og de fremsatte forslag til afgørelse offentliggøres senere i »Samling af Afgørelser«, som er eneste gyldige udgave.
Case T-257/97 Hans C. Herold ν Commission of the European Communities Staff Regulations of Officials
Gengivelse kan ske med kildeangivelse.
Case T-66/98 Giuliana Gaspari ν European Parliament Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag C-59/97 Den Italienske Republik / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
Case C-166/97 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic Environment and consumers
Forenede sager C-289/96, C-293/96 og C-299/96 Kongeriget Danmark / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
Joined Cases C-289/96, C-293/96 and C-299/961 Kingdom of Denmark, Federal Republic of Germany and French Republic v Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
Sag C-166/97 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber / Den Franske Republik Miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse
Case C-304/97 Ρ Fernando Carbajo Ferrerò ν European Parliament Staff Regulations of Officials
Sag C-304/97 Ρ Fernando Carbajo Ferrerò / Europa-Parlamentet Tjenestemandsvedtægten
Case C-59/97
Sag C-222/97 Manfred Trümmer og Peter Mayer Frie kapitalbevægelser
Case C-378/97 Floras Ariel Wijsenbeek
Forenede sager C-289/96, C-293/96 og C-299/96 Kongeriget Danmark / Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber Landbrug
Joined Cases C-289/96, C-293/96 and C-299/96 Kingdom of Denmark, Federal Republic of Germany and French Republic ν Commission of the European Communities Agriculture
16. marts 1999
16 March 1999
I denne forordning forstås ved en betegnelse, der er blevet en artsbetegnelse, navnet på et landbragsprodukt eller et levnedsmiddel, der, selv om det henviser til det sted eller område, hvor landbragsproduktet eller levnedsmidlet først blev fremstillet eller markedsført, er blevet fællesbetegnelsen for et landbragsprodukt eller et levnedsmiddel. (...)«
For the purposes of this Regulation, a "name that has become generic" means the name of an agricultural product or a foodstuff which, although it relates to the place or the region where this product or foodstuff was originally produced or marketed, has become the common name of an agricultural product or a foodstuff.
Ved stævninger indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor henholdsvis den 30. august 1996, den 9. september 1996 og den 12. september 1996 har Kongeriget Danmark, Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og Den Franske Republik anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1107/96 af 12. juni 1996 (herefter »den omtvistede forordning«), for så vidt som »feta« i forordningen er registreret som beskyttet oprindelsesbetegnelse (herefter »BOB«).
By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 30 August, 9 September and 12 September 1996 respectively, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic brought actions for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 of 12 June 1996 (hereinafter 'the contested regulation') in so far as it registered the designation 'Feta' as a protected designation of origin (hereinafter 'PDO').
I begrundelsen for forslaget til beslutning hedder det, at for så vidt angik betegnelsen »feta« havde Kommissionen ved mange lejligheder modtaget kraftige reaktioner med hensyn til spørgsmålet om navnets karakter af artsbetegnelse.
It is clear from the explanatory memorandum to the proposal for a decision that, as far as the name 'Feta' is concerned, the Commission had received, on numerous occasions, strong reactions as to whether or not it was a generic name.
Det fremgår i så henseende af sagen, at et flertal af medlemsstater havde anmodet Kommissionen om at optage betegnelsen »feta« på den liste over artsbetegnelser, Kommissionen var ved at udarbejde.
The documents before the Court show that a majority of the Member States had asked the Commission to include the name 'Feta' on the list of generic names which it was preparing.
Artikel 3 i Rådets grundforordning nr. 2081/92 af 14. juli 1992 har følgende ordlyd:
Article 3 of the basic Council Regulation No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 provides:
af feta, om den pågældende mælks kvalitative karakteristika, om metoden til fremstilling af osten og dennes kvalitative egenskaber.
production of Feta, the qualitative characteristics of that milk, the processes for manufacturing the cheese and its qualitative characteristics.