natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(EØF) nr. 574/72, artiklerne 10, 10a, 85 og 86, bilag 8
(Language of the case: German)
Afgørelse nr. 150 af 26. juni 1992 om anvendelsen af artiklerne 77 og 78 samt artikel 79, stk. 3, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 og artikel 10, stk. 1, litra b), ii), I forordning (EØF) nr. 574/72
in Joined Cases 154 and 155/87 (references for a preliminary ruling made by the Third Chamber of the Hof van Cassatie of Belgium): Rijksinstituut voor de Sociale Verzekeringen der Zelfstandigen ν Heinrich Wolf and Others
Domme afsagt af Domstolen:
Publication of the judgment: OJ C 210, 10.8.1988.
Afgørelse nr. 77 af 22. februar 1973 om beregning af børnetilskud i medfør af artikel 73, stk. 2, og artikel 74, stk. 2, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71
(Language of the case: French) in Case 21/87 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Bundessozialgericht): Felix Borowitz ν Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte
Afgørelse nr. 119 af 24. februar 1983 om for tolkning af artikel 76 og artikel 79, stk. 3, i for ordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71, samt artikel 10, stk. 1, i forordning (EØF) nr. 574/72 om samtidig ret til familieydelser og børnetilskud
(Language of the case: German) benefits who is a national of a Member State and has dependent children but resides in another Member State entitlement to payment by the social security institutions of his country of origin only of 'family allowances', as defined in Article 1(u)(ii) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, to the exclusion of other family benefits such as the 'rentrée scolaire' (school expenses) allowance and the 'salaire unique' (single wage) allowance provided for by French legislation.
Afgørelse nr. 142 af 13. februar 1990 om anvendelsen af artiklerne 73, 74 og 75 I forordning nr. 1408/71
Publication of the judgment: OJ C 78, 29.3.1989.
Afgørelse nr. 144 af 9. april 1990 om de blanket ter, der er nødvendige for gennemførelsen af Rådets forordninger (EØF) nr. 1408/71 og nr. 574/72 (E 401-E 410 F)
Judgment of 14 December 1988 in Case 269/87 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Bayerisches Landessozialgericht): Natalino Ventura ν Landesversicherungsanstalt Schwaben
Afgørelse nr. 145 af 27. juni 1990 om efterbetaling af familieydelsertil selvstændige erhvervs drivende i henhold til artikel 73 og 74 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71
Article 44(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 must be interpreted as meaning that orphans' pensions are governed solely by the provisions of Chapter 8 thereof, supplemented, if necessary, by the provi­sions of the other chapters to which Chapter 8 ex­pressly refers.
Familieydelser og børnetilskud
Publication of the judgment: OJ C 141,7.6.1989.
»Familieydelser« betyder alle natural- eller kontantydelser, der tager sigte på udligning af forsørgerbyrder, med undtagelse af de i bilag II til forordningen nævnte særlige ydelser.
Article 76 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that the right to family allowances payable by the Member State of employment under Article 73 of that Regu­lation is suspended only up to the amount actually paid by way of benefits of the same kind in the Member State on whose territory the worker's fam­ily resides.
De særlige ydelser består af en ydelse ved fødsel efter lovgivningen i Belgien og Luxembourg og en ydelse, der tildeles for børn under tre måneder, efter fransk lovgivning.
If the amount of family allowances actu­ally received in the Member State of residence is below that of the allowances provided for under the legislation of the other Member State, the worker is entitled to a supplementary allowance equal to the difference between the two amounts, the cost of which is to be borne by the competent institution in the other Member State.
En familieydelse, der automatisk udbetales til familier, der opfylder visse objektive kriterier, navn lig angående størrelse, indtægter og formue, skal anses for familieydelser i forordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, litra h) 's forstand (sag C-78/91, Hughes mod Chief Adjudication Officer; dom af 16.7.1992).
Since it does not involve direct or indirect par­ticipation in the exercise of powers conferred by public law and in the discharge of functions whose purpose is to safeguard the general interests of the State or of other public authorities and which there­fore require a special relationship of allegiance to the State on the part of persons occupying them and reciprocity of rights and duties which form the
570. »Børnetilskud« betyder periodiske kontant ydelser, som tildeles udelukkende ud fra antallet af familiemedlemmer og evt. disses alder.
Compendium of Community provisions on social security
Arbejdstagere kan til gengæld gøre krav på sådanne fordele efter lovgivningen i bopælsmedlemsstaten i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 2, i forordning nr. 1612/68, hvori følgende er bestemt:
Judgment of 27 September 1989 in Case 130/88 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven): C. C. van de Bijl v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken
En arbejdstager, som er statsborger i en medlemsstat, må ikke på en anden medlemsstats område behandles anderledes end arbejdstagere med denne stats statsborgerskab ...
It follows from the wording of Article 12(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 that overlapping of benefits occurs not only when one person is enti tled to two different family benefits at the same time, but also when two different persons, such as for example both parents, are entitled to such ben efits in respect of the same child.
Det bemærkes, at den vandrende arbejdstager og hans familiemedlemmer kun har rettigheder i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 2, i forordning nr. 1612/68 i den medlemsstat, hvor ydelserne tilkendes.
On that interpretation, the provisions in question are not incompatible with Article 51 of the EEC Treaty, since Article 46 is applicable only if it allows a migrant worker to be granted benefits at least as high as those payable under the legislation of one State alone.
Der er efter fællesskabsretten ingen forpligtelse til eksportabilitet for denne medlemsstat.
in Case C­324/88 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Cour du travail. Mons): Rosario Velia ν Alliance nationale des mutualités chrétiennes, Brussels
168/88, Dammer mod VZW Securex Kinderbijslag fonds; dom af 14. december 1989
(Language of the case: French)
C-228/88, Bronzino mod Kindergeldkasse Nuremberg; dom af 22. februar 1990
Judgment of 21 March 1990 in Case C­228/88 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Bayerische Landessozialgericht): Giovanni Bronzino ν Kindergeldkasse
Med henblik på erhvervelse af ret til ydelser efter en medlemsstats lovgivning skal forsikringsperioder og perioder med lønnet beskæftigelse eller selv stændig erhvervsvirksomhed på enhver anden medlemsstats område medregnes i det omfang, det er nødvendigt (forordning nr. 1408/71, artikel 72).
Article 74 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community must be in­terpreted as meaning that where the legislation of the Member State which provides certain family benefits lays down, as a condition for the grant of those benefits, that an unemployed member of the worker's family must be at the disposal of the em­ployment office for the territorial area in which that legislation applies, that condition must be regarded as fulfilled where the unemployed member of the family is at the disposal of the employment office of the Member State in which he resides.
Ansøgeren skal forelægge den kompetente in stitution en attestation på blanket E 405 med angivelse af forsikrings- eller beskæftigelsesperioder, der er tilbagelagt efter den lovgivning, ansøgeren har været omfattet af forinden (forordning nr. 574/ 72, artikel 85).
When the legislation of only one Member State is applied, the classification, in the light of the anti­overlapping rules contained in that legislation, of an early­retirement pension awarded underthe leg­islation of that State alone, and of an invalidity pen­sion awarded by another Member State is not gov­erned by Community law.
Attestationen udstedes i den medlemsstat, hvor forsikrings- eller beskæftigelsesperioderne er tilbagelagt, enten af den institution, der er kompe-
Where a worker receives a pension by virtue of national legislation alone, the provisions of Regula­
157 tent for familieydelser, eller af en af de institutioner, der står opført i bilag 10 til forordning nr. 574/72.
Judgment of 3 May 1990 that he has been employed for at least three months since his return to Belgium.
Attestationen kan erstattes af en kopi af blanket E 104 udstedt af sygeforsikringsinstitutionen.
Publication of the judgment: OJ C 143, 13.6.1990.
1408/71's formål: at garantere alle arbejdstagere, som er statsborgere i en medlemsstat, og som migrerer inden for Fællesskabet, ligebehandling ef ter de forskellige, nationale lovgivninger og ret til at modtage sociale sikringsydelser uanset beskæftigelsessted og bopælssted.
in Case C­2/89 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Centrale Raad van Beroep, Utrecht): Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank ν Kits van Heijningen
Dette skal fortolkes ens af alle medlemsstaterne, uanset hvilke ordninger der måtte være vedtaget i nationale lovgivninger vedrørende erhvervelsen af ret til familieydelser« (sag 104/80, Beeck mod Bundesanstalt für Arbeit; dom af 19.2.1981).
(Language of the case: Dutch) in Case C­342/88 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Arbeidshof, Ghent): Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen ν Spits
Arbejdstagere og selvstændige erhvervsdrivende, hvis familiemedlemmer er bosat i en anden medlemsstat end den kompetente stat (forordning nr. 1408/71, artikel 73)
In determining the amount of the independent ben­efit referred to by Article 46(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, the competent institution of a Member State must, on the one hand, disregard any period of insurance completed in another Member State and, on the other hand, take into account any ad­ministrative practice permitting derogation from the strict application of the national legislation.
Arbejdstagere og selvstændige erhvervsdri vende, som er omfattet af en medlemsstats lovgiv ning, har ret til familieydelser efter dennes lovgiv ning for familiemedlemmer, der er bosat i en anden medlemsstat (artikel 73).
Article 13(2)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 is to be interpreted as meaning that a person cov­ered by that Regulation who carries on the activi­ties of an employed person part­time in the terri­tory of a Member State is subject to the legislation of that State both on the days on which the person carries on those activities and on the days on which he does not.
Hvis en særlig betingelse skal være opfyldt for, at der er ret til familieydelser (f.eks. tilmelding til arbejdsformidlingen i den kompetente stat), kan en sådan betingelse anses for opfyldt på grundlag af begivenheder, der er Indtrådt, eller omstændigheder, der er opstået i en anden medlemsstat.
The effect of Article 13(2)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 is that as against the persons referred to in that provision it is not possible to rely upon a provision of the national legislation applicable whereby admission to the social security scheme provided for by that legislation is made subject to the condition that the person concerned should re­side in the Member State on whose territory the activity as an employed person is carried on.
Ovennævnte ret er betinget af bestemmelse me i bilag VI til forordning nr. 1408/71.
(Language of the case: French) obligations under Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the applica­tion of social security schemes to employed per­sons, to self­employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community.
I sagen Bronzino mod Kindergeldkasse (sag C-228/88; dom af 22.2.1990) har Domstolen fundet, at artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71:
Publication of the judgment: OJ, 8.8.1990.
»skal fortolkes således, at hvis det i henhold til en medlemsstats lovgivning, som hjemler en bestemt familieydelse, er en betingelse for opnåelsen af denne, at et medlem af arbejdstagerens familie skal være tilmeldt arbejdsformidlingen på dens område, anses denne betingelse for opfyldt, hvis familiemedlemmet er registreret hos arbejdsformidlingen i den medlemsstat, i hvilken han er bosat«.
Judgment of 13 November 1990 in Case C­99/89 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Sozialgericht Frankfurt): Yanez­Campoy ν Bundesanstalt für Arbeit
En selvstændig erhvervsdrivende, som ufrivilligt ophører med sin virksomhed, og som har ret til ydelser ved arbejdsløshed i kraft af bidrag, han har indbetalt eller som er godskrevet ham som lønmodtager, kunne ikke betragtes som »arbejdstager« i henhold til artikel 73, stk. 1, i forordning nr. nr. 1408/ 71, inden den blev ændret ved forordning nr. 3427/ 89 (sag C-15/90, Middleburg mod Chief Adjudication Officer).
The position of a recipient of social benefits guaranteed by the legislation of a Member State by reason of self­employed activity in territory which at the time maintained special relations with a Member State does not come within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self­employed persons and to members of theirfamilies moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 laying down the procedure for imple­menting Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 in the ver­sion contained in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/ 83 of 2 June 1983 where, during the period in question, the recipient was a national of a State which was not at the time a member of the Euro­pean Community and became a member only after the recipient ceased to be a national of it.
Inden artikel 73 I forordning nr. 1408/71 blev ændret ved forordning nr. 3427/89 var det kun løn modtagere, der var berettiget til familieydelser for de familiemedlemmer, der var bosat i en anden medlemsstat end den kompetente.
The prohibition of discrimination contained in Article 7(1) of the EEC Treaty and implemented by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 in rela­tion to social security does not apply where the recipient of a social benefit does not come within the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Selvstændige erhvervsdrivende havde hverken efter forordning nr. 1408/71 eller efter Unions-traktatens artikel 51 eller 52 en tilsvarende ret for familiemedlemmer, der var bosat uden for den kompetente stat.
The uniform solution for all the Member States, referred to in Article 99 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, in the version of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, came into force on 15 January 1986 and, subsequently, in accordance with Article 60 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Repub­lic, Article 73(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 ap­plies with effect from that date to Spanish workers employed in a Member State other than Spain, the members of whose families reside in Spain.
Hvis en arbejdstager er omfattet af lovgivningen i en medlemsstat og sammen med sin familie er bosat i en anden medlemsstat, kan ægtefællen, selv hvis vedkommende på intet tidspunkt har været beskæftiget eller bosat I den stat, hvori arbejdstageren er beskæftiget, i henhold til artikel 73 i for ordning nr. 1408/71 gøre en afledet ret til familieydelser til en arbejdstagers famille gældende over for den kompetente institution i den nævnte stat; forudsat arbejdstageren opfylder be stemmelserne I artikel 73, og forudsat den pågældende familieydelse tilkommer arbejdstageres fa milie efter den nationale lovgivning (sag C-78/91, Hughes mod Chief Adjudication Officer, Belfast; dom af 16.7.1992).
The provisions of Community law do not pre­clude national legislation which provides that a self­employed person's retirement pension is payable abroad only to beneficiaries residing on the terri­tory of a non­member country where a self­employed person's pension could be paid to them pursuant to a reciprocity agreement in so far as it has effect only outside the Community.
»Ifølge Unions-traktatens artikel 51, hvis den fortolkedes rigtigt, bestod der ingen forpligtelse til betaling af børnetilskud for den medlemsstat, på hvis område en person udøver selvstændig virksomhed ....hvis denne persons børn var bosat i en anden medlemsstat.
in Case C­216/89 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Bundessozialgericht): Reibold ν Bun­desanstalt für Arbeit
Med virkning fra den 15. januar 1986 er en selv stændig erhvervsdrivende, der er omfattet af en medlemsstats lovgivning, imidlertid i henhold til artikel 73 i forordning nr. 1408/71, som ændret ved forordning nr. 3427/89, berettiget til fa milieydelser for børn, der er bosat i en anden medlemsstat, efter den førstnævnte medlemsstats lovgivning« (sag C-114/88, Delbar mod Caisse d'allocations familiales de Roubaix-Tourcoing; dom af 15.12.19891.
Judgment of 31 January 1991 in Case C­18/90 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Cour du travail, Liège: Office national de l'emploi (ONEM) ν Bahia Kziber
Der optjenes ret til familieydelser efter artikel 73 under arbejdstagerens eller den selvstændige erhvervsdrivendes beskæftigelse I en anden med lemsstat end den, hvori hans familie er bosat.
A provision of an agreement concluded by the Community with a non­member country must be regarded as being directly applicable when, regard being had to its wording and to the purpose and nature of the agreement itself, the provision con­tains a clear and precise obligation which is not subject, in its implementation or effects, to the adoption of any subsequent measure.
Følgelig optjener grænsearbejdere, der sammen med ægtefælle og børn er bosat i en anden medlemsstat end beskæftigelsesstaten, ret til børnetilskud fra den sidstnævnte stat.
Such is the case as regards Article 41(1) of the Co­operation Agreement between the EEC and Mo­rocco, a provision which forms part of Title III relat­ing to cooperation in the field of labour and which, far from being purely programmatic in nature, es­tablishes, in the field of working conditions and re­muneration and in that of social security, the prin­ciple that there is to be no discrimination, on the
Unions-traktatens artikel 52 er ikke til hinder for, at en med lemsstats lovgivning, efter hvilken retten til børnetilskud er be grænset til børn, der er bosat på den pågældende medlemsstats område, anvendes på en statsborger i denne stat i en periode, hvor den pågældende efter at have været beskæftiget i en anden medlemsstat og have fået et barn dér, er flyttet tilbage til hjem staten, alene, og dér udøver selvstændig virksomhed« (Sag C-15/90, Middleburgh mod Chief Adjudication Officer; dom af 4.10.1991).
379 tributions as a compulsorily insured person to cover benefits payable by an institution of another Mem­ber State.
580. »For at artikel 73, stk. 1, skal finde anvendelse, er det således tilstrækkeligt, at arbejdstageren er bosat på én medlemsstats område, mens familie medlemmerne er bosat på en anden medlemsstats område.
basis of nationality, against Moroccan workers and members of their families living with them, a prin­ciple capable of governing directly the legal situa­tion of individuals.
Denne ordning modsvarer selve forordning nr.
Publication of the judgment: OJ C 68, 1991.
Forordning nr. 3427/89 er gældende fra den 15. januar 1986, datoen for dommen i sag 47/84 Pinna mod Caisse d'allocations familiales de la Savoie.
Publication of the judgment: OJ C 50, 26.2.1991.
Der er i den Administrative Kommissions afgørelse nr. 145 givet nærmere retningslinjer for, hvorledes der skal ansøges om familieydelser til selvstændige
in Case C­245/88 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Centrale Raad van Beroep, Utrecht): Daalmeijer ν Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekerings­bank
Samling af fællesskabsbestemmelserne om social sikring
(Language of the case: German)
(EØF) 1408/71 er ugyldig, for så vidt arbejdstagere, der er omfattet af fransk lovgivning, ikke er berettiget til franske børnetilskud for de af deres familiemedlem mer, der er bosat på en anden medlemsstats område«.
Article 13(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self­employed persons and to members of their fami­lies moving within the Community as contained in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, is not applicable to a person who has definitively left his employment in the Civil Service of a Mem­ber State and has then gone to reside with his spouse in another Member State in which he has no occupation and is not covered by a social secu­rity scheme in any other capacity.
Domstolen har dog fastsat en tidsbegrænsning for retsvirkningerne af denne dom:
(Language of the case: Dutch) in Case C­10/90 (reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Bundessozialgericht): Maria Masgio ν Bundesknappshaft
Arbejdsløse, hvis børn er bosat på en anden medlemsstats område (forordning nr. 1408/71, artikel 74)
However, these rules do prevent such a person from being required to pay in that State, owing to the fact that he resides there, con­
»Bortset fra tilfælde, hvor arbejdstagere har anlagt retssag eller indgivet en hermed sidestillet administrativ klage inden datoen for afsigelsen af denne dom, kan det forhold, at artikel 73, stk. 2, i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 er ugyldig, ikke gøres gældende til støtte for krav vedrørende børnetilskud for perioder forud for denne dato«.
Articles 7 and 48 to 51 of the EEC Treaty and Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self­employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version codified by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, must be interpreted as meaning that a migrant worker who is receiving an old­age pension under the legislation of one Member State and accident
En arbejdsløs, som tidligere har udøvet lønnet eller selvstændig beskæftigelse, og som modtager arbejdsløshedsunderstøttelse efter lovgivningen i en medlemsstat, har ret til familieydelser efter lov givningen i den nævnte stat for sine familiemedlemmer, der er bosat i en anden medlemsstat, som om disse var bosat dér, dog under forbehold af be stemmelserne i Bilag VI (artikel 74).
(Language of the case: German) insurance benefits paid by an insurance institution of another Member State may not be put in a worse position, when the calculation of the part of the benefit to be suspended pursuant to national legis­lation is carried out, than a worker who has not availed himself of his right of free movement and is receiving both benefits under the legislation of a single Member State.
Hvad angår retten til børnetilskud for spanske og portugisiske arbejdstagere, der er beskæftiget i en anden medlemsstat end Spanien og Portugal, og hvis familie er bosat i Spanien eller Portugal, har Domstolen i sag C-99/89, Yanez-Campoy mod Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (dom af 13.11.1990), afsagt følgende dom:
The relevant Community legislation, in particular Articles 67(3), 69 and 70 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self­employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, does not preclude a Member State from refusing to grant a worker unemployment benefit for more than the maximum period of three months laid down in Arti­cle 69 of that Regulation when the worker has not completed lastly periods of insurance or employ­ment in that Member State.
Ændringer i kapitel 7 i forordning nr. 1408/71 i kraft af forordning nr. 3427/89
Judgment of 11 June 1991