natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Både franskmændene og hollænderne, der ikke mener, at Parlamentet for øjeblikket har den store betydning, går stærkt ind for, at det skal have sine beføjelser udvidet (henholdsvis 59% og 55%).
Both the French and the Dutch, who did not view the Parliament as particularly important at the present time were strongly in favour of it gaining in importance (59% and 55% respectively).
De har således den samme opfattelse som et flertal af italienerne (69%), portugiserne (60%), grækerne (54%) og belgierne (51%), som ønsker en sådan ændring.
They joined most Italians (69%), Portuguese (60%), Greeks (54%) and Belgians (51%) in calling for this change.
Kun danskerne og luxembourgerne foretrak at Parlamentets situation forblev den samme.
Only the Danes and Luxembourgers were more content to see Parliament's situation stay the same.
En femtedel af de adspurgte danskere (20%) og briter (19%) Ønskede endog, at Parlamentet skulle fratages nogle af sine beføjelser (Diagram 5.5, Tabel 76).
At worst, a fifth of Danes (20%) and British (19%) wanted Parliament to lose some of its importance (Figure 5.5, Table 76).
Meningsdannerne var de mest ivrige tilhængere af tanken. Personer til venstre i det politiske spektrum var mere ivrige tilhængere af tanken end personer på højrefløjen - kun godt en tredjedel af tilhængerne med de nationale politiske partier, der er grupperet under De Europæiske Demokrater, afviste tanken (37% "større betydning" mod 23% "samme betydning" og 25% "mindre betydning").
The profile of those supporting Parliament becoming more important was a little different from those who most favoured EC membership and '1992' (see Chapters 1 & 2)(Figure 5.6, Table 77). Enthusiasm increased with better education and income, but those still studying and the young were not as ardent about this issue as with others. Opinion-leaders were the idea's most fervent backers. Those on the left of the political spectrum were more supportive than those on the right - only over a third of sympathisers of the national parties belonging to the European Democrats rejected the idea (37% "more important" versus 23% "same" and 25% "less important"). 5.3 PROSPECTS FOR A FUTURE EUROPEAN UNION
Et flertal af EF-borgerne pá næsten tre i forhold 11 I én (55% mod 19%) anså det for en god idé at oprette en europæisk union, og at der i denne forbindelse blev dannet en europæisk regering, som skulle stå til ansvar over for Europa-Parlamentet.
By a majority of almost three to one (55% versus 19%), the citizens of Europe welcomed the idea of a future European Union with a European Government answerable to a European Parliament.
I løbet af de tre år, hvor dette spørgsmål er blevet stillet, er tilslutningen til denne idé steget fra 48% i slutningen af 1987 til 54% i begyndelsen af 1989. Siden har den ligget pá stort set samme niveau.
During the three years that this question has been asked, support for this idea has increased from 48% in late 1987 to 54% in early 1989, at which level it has largely remained.
I samme periode er der sket et tilsvarende fald i antallet af modstandere af denne Ide (fra 24% til 19%).
This has been matched by a decline of those disagreeing with the idea over the same period (24% to 19%).
Tilslutningen var størst blandt italienere (70%) og spaniere (65%).
Greatest support came from Italians (70%) and Spaniards (65%).
Itaienerne har altid været de mest ivrige tilhængere , mens tilslutningen blandt spanierne, som er steget mærkbart siden slutningen af 1987, nåede et højdepunkt i efteråret 1990.
The Italians have always been its most fervent backers, while Spanish support, after increasing consistently since late 1987, stood at an all-time high in Autumn 1990.
Et flertal af de adspurgte gik ind for tanken. Dette var dog ikke tilfældet blandt briterne, hvor der var meget delte menninger (32% "for" og 37% "imod"), og blandt danskerne, der var meget ¡mod tanken (23% mod 61%).
A majority of people agreed with the idea except for the British, who were largely divided on the matter (33% in favour; 37% against) and the Danes who were strongly opposed to it (23% versus 61%).
Holdningen blandt danskerne er blevet mere positiv inden for de seneste tre år, hvilket især skyldes, at der nu er færre, som ikke har taget stilling.
Danish views have become more positive over the past three years, largely at the expense of those who were undecided.
Holdningen blandt briterne har svinget i den samme periode, og man kan stadig ikke tale om nogen egentlig tendens.
British views have fluctuated during the same period and still do not show a definite direction.
De eneste større ændringer inden for de seneste seks måneder er sket i Luxembourg, hvor modstanden er steget (fra 11% til 22%), og i Tyskland, hvor der er sket et større fald i modstanden (fra 24% til 14%) (Diagram 5.7, Tabel 78).
The only major movements over the past six months have been an increase in opposition to the idea from Luxembourgers (11% to 22%) and a major decrease in opposition in West Germany (24% to 14%) (Figure 5.7, Table 78).
Europa-Parlamentet mener, at det bør have større beføjelser for bedre at kunne udføre sine opgaver og for at kunne afhjælpe det "demokratiske underskud", som man mener gør sig gældende i EF.
The European Parliament feels it should have more powers to do its job better and to make up for the 'democratic deficit' that is perceived within the Community.
EF-borgerne kunne tilslutte sig Parlamentets ønsker om øgede beføjelser I en kommende politisk union, herunder fx retten til sammen med Ministerrådet at vedtage EF's lovgivning (64% mod 14%), retten t i I på eget initiativ at fremsætte forslag til EF-love (57% mod 23%), og endelig retten t i I at godkende udnævnelsen af Kommissionens medlemmer (56% mod 18%).
EC citizens agreed with the powers that the European Parliament wished to gain within a future political union, such as the right to decide together with the Council of Ministers on EC legislation (64% versus 14%); to put forward draft EC laws on its own initiative (57% versus 23%); and to approve the nomination of the members of the Commission (56% versus 18%).
EF-borgerne var ligeledes enige i, at Europa-Parlamentet skulle føre kontrol med Den Europæiske Centralbanks forvaltning af den økonomiske og monetære union (52% mod 21%), og at det skulle have beføjelse til at ratificere alle EF's internationale aftaler og konventioner, inden disse trådte i kraft (49% mod 23%) (Diagram 5.8, Tabel 79).
They also agreed that the European Parliament should have control over the European Central Bank's management of the EMU (52% versus 21%); and have the power to ratify all EC international agreements and conventions before they come into action (49% versus 23%) (Figure 5.8, Table 79).
For seks måneder siden var de fleste danskere imod tre af disse fire forslag, dvs. Europa-Parlamentets ret til at ratificere internationale aftaler (45% mod 35%), Europa-Parlamentets ret til at godkende udnævnelsen af medlemmerne af Kommissionen (48% mod 33%) og Europa-Parlamentets ret t i I pá eget initiativ at fremsætte lovforslag (46% mod 38%).
Six months ago, most Danes were against three of the four measures on the table: the European Parliament ratifying international agreements (45% versus 35%); approving the nomination of EC Commissioners (48% versus 33%); and taking legislative initiatives on its own (46% versus 38%).
Sidstnævnte forslag kunne briterne heller ikke gå ind for (43% mod 37%).
The latter was disagreeable to the British (43% versus 37%) as well.
Denne gang var der flertal for alle forslag i samtlige lande, dog med følgende undtagelser: i Danmark var der stadig (stigende) modstand mod Europa-Parlamentets ret t i I at ratificere internationale aftaler (53% mod 28%), og både briterne (39% mod 34%) og danskerne (48% mod 33%) var modstandere af, at Europa-Parlamentet skulle kontrollere Den Europæiske Centralbanks forvaltning af den økonomiske og monetære union.
This time around, majorities in all countries were in favour of all the proposals with the exception of continued (and stronger) Danish opposition to the European Parliament ratifying international agreements (53% versus 28%) and both the British (39% versus 34%) and the Danes (48% versus 33%) opposing the European Parliament's control over the European Central Bank's management of EMU.
Inden for de seneste seks måneder fandt den største stigning i støtten til de ovenfor nævnte forslag sted i Danmark, mens der i Irland skete et markant fald I støtten t i I de fleste af forslagene.
Over the past six months, strongest increases in support for the above proposals were seen from the Danes while support fell significantly among the Irish on most of the measures.
Mens borgernes tilslutning til at give Europa-Parlamentet flere lovgivningsmæssige beføjelser steg i tre fjerdedele af EF-landene, faldt tilslutningen til at give Europa-Parlamentet ret til at ratificere internationale aftaler og konventioner, inden disse træder i kraft inden for EF, i størstedelen af medlemslandene.
While public support increased in three-quarters of Community countries to give the European Parliament more legislative powers, it fell in most countries concerning the European Parliament's powers to ratify international agreements and conventions of the EC before they come into action.
Generelt er der således en ret bred tilslutning til at give Europa-Parlamentet øgede beføjelser, bl.a. med hensyn til at lovgive.
Thus support is fairly solid overall for the European Parliament's powers to be enhanced, particularly concerning the right to legislate.
Selv om danskerne blev mere positivt stemt over for især dette forslag, er de stadig de mest udtalte modstandere af at give Europa-Parlamentet større beføjelser pä andre områder.
Although the Danes became more favourable towards the above issue in particular, they still show the greatest resistance to giving the European Parliament more powers in other areas.
Det var særlig bemærkelsesværdigt, at der blandt franskmændene var så stor tilslutning t i I at øge Europa-Parlamentets betydning, eftersom Frankrig officielt går ind for at styrke de enkelte landes regeringer og par lamenter.
It is particularly interesting that the French public was so strongly in favour of increasing the European Parliament's role, given France's official preference for enhancing the role of national governments and national parliaments with the Community instead.
Blandt de eksterne samarbejdspartnere kan nævnes Berlin Science Centre, som undersøgte folks vaner med hensyn til, hvilke organisationer de var medlem af, og European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR), som afprøvede et sæt harmoniserede demografiske oversigter, der skal anvendes i forbindelse med alle meningsmålings- og markedsundersøgelser i Europa forud for etableringen af det indre marked og et integreret økonomisk område i Europa.
External partners included the Berlin Science Centre, which asked questions on people's membership of organizations, and the European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR), which tested a set of harmonised demographics to be used in all opinion and market research in Europe in the perspective of the Single European Market and "European Economic Space".
Nogle fá spørgsmål af almen interesse er blevet underkastet en foreløbig analyse, så resultaterne kunne komme med i denne rapport.
A few questions of general interest have been subjected to a rough preliminary analysis so that they could feature in early illustrative form among the results of the present report.
6.1 HVAD FORÆLDRE FORVENTER AF DERES BØRN
6.1 WHAT PARENTS EXPECT FROM THEIR CHILDREN
Inden for EF var tre ud af fem adspurgte (62%) af den opfattelse, at blandt tre vigtige egenskaber hos børn burde man først og fremmest styrke ansvarsfølelsen. Omkring halvdelen
Three out of five people (62%) in the Community believed that one of the three most important qualities to be encouraged in their children is a sense of responsibility.
(49%) mente, at respekten for andre også var vigtig (Diagram 6.1, Tabel 80).
Around half ( 49%) felt respect for others was important too (Figure 6.1, Table 80).
I de fleste lande mente størstedelen af de adspurgte, at det var vigtigt at opdrage børn til at være ansvarsbevidste.
Teaching children a sense of responsibility was the people's first choice in most countries.
Imidlertid fik gode manerer og høflighed en topplacering blandt grækere (60%), italienere (58%) og irere (52%) (i disse lande kom ansvarsfølelsen ind på en andenplads). Franskmændene anså tolerance/respekt for andre og ansvarsfølelse for lige vigtige (62% i begge tilfælde).
However, the Greeks (60%), Italians (58%) and Irish (52%) placed good manners and politeness top of their list (with responsibility coming second) while the French gave equal importance to promoting tolerance/respect as encouraging a sense of responsibility (both 62%).
Blandt danskere blev selvstændighed (61%) opfattet som næsten lige så vigtig som ansvarsfølelse (63%).
The Danes felt independence (61%) was almost as important as a sense of responsibility (63%).
Adspurgte i aldersgruppen 15-24 ár mente i lighed med den ældre generation, at ansvarsfølelse (64%) var det vigtigste karaktertræk, hvorimod de herefter prioriterede tolerance/respekt (47%) og evnen t i I at kommunikere (39%).
Young people (15-24 years olds) agreed with the older generation that a sense of responsibility (64%) was the most important quality, but they felt tolerance/respect (47%) and encouraging an ability to communicate with others (39%) were the next priorities.
Blandt de ældre blev der lagt større vægt pá gode manerer og høflighed, pligtfølelse over for arbejde og religion.
Older people gave more weight to the importance of good manners and politeness, conscientiousness at work and religious faith in children.
De yngre generationer fandt i højere grad end de ældre, at man burde fremme børnenes kommunikationsevne, selvstændighed og fantasi.
Promoting an ability to communicate with others, independence and imagination in children were felt to be more important qualities by younger than older generations.
INDVANDRERES RETTIGHEDER I EF
6.2 RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANTS IN THE COMMUNITY
Meningerne var delte, når det drejede sig om, hvem der skal træffe beslutning om indvandreres sociale og politiske rettigheder i EF.
People were divided as to who should decide on the social and political rights of immigrants in the Community.
Fire ud af t i (39%) sagde, at EF- insti tut ionerne skulle tage sig af dette spørgsmål, mens næsten en tredjedel (29%) sagde, at EF-landenes regeringer kun skulle rådføre sig med hinanden, og en fjerdedel (23%) sagde, at de enkelte landes regeringer burde træffe beslutninger alene (Diagram 6.2,
Four out of ten (39%) said that Community institutions should take care of the issue, while close to a third (29%) said that member state governments should merely consult each other, and a quarter (23%) that national governments should make their own decisions (Figure 6.2, Table 81).
Generelt mente EF-borgerne, at indvandrernes rettigheder burde forblive uændrede (34%) eller øges (33%).
Overall EC citizens felt that immigrants rights should stay the same (34%) or be extended (33%).
Kun en femtedel (19%) sagde, at de burde indskrænkes (Tabel 82).
Only a fifth (19%) said they should be restricted (Table 82).
I de fleste EF-lande mente de adspurgte, at indvandrernes rettigheder i det store og hele skulle forblive uændrede.
In most EC countries, people felt immigrants' rights should on balance stay the same as they are.
Generelt mente de adspurgte i Fællesskabets sydlige medlemslande - spaniere (56%), italienere (46%), grækere (45%) og portugisere (40%) - at indvandrernes rettigheder burde udvides.
Among the southern members of the Community - Spaniards (56%), Italians (46%), Greeks (45%) and Portuguese (40%) - people felt on the whole that rights should be extended.
I Irland var der lige så mange imod som for en udvidelse af rettighederne (37% "udvides" mod 36% "bevares som de er").
The Irish were divided between the two options (37% "extend" versus 36% "left as they are").
Kun blandt belgiere (32%) og danskere (30%) mente et større antal personer, at indvandrernes rettigheder pá visse punkter burde indskrænkes.
Only among Belgians (32%) and Danes (30%) was there any significant feeling that immigrants' rights should be restricted in some way.
Oversættelse af diagramtekster ρ ι agram 1.1 =
Page 80
Der er sket en meget betydelig stigning i den samlede stötte til foreningen af Europa og t i I EF, i særdeleshed i Spanien og Portugal.
Global support for European Unification and the European Community continues to rise, especially in Spain and Portugal.
Den stigning i danskernes opbakning, der startede i foråret 1990, fortsetter.
The resurgence in Danish support, which began in Spring 1990, continues.
Kun tyskerne i de fem nye delstater viser en faldende interesse for EF.
Only Germans from the five new Länder show disenchantment with the EC.
21% af EF­borgerne synes, at den feiles landbrugspolitik har givet "gode" resultater, 35% at den har givet "dårlige" resultater.
21% of Europeans find the results of CAP "good" and 35% "bad".
54% af EF­borgerne ser positivt pá den nye reform af den fælles landbrugspolitik, der er under debat i 1991.
The new CAP reform, under debate in 1991, is welcomed by 54% of Europeans.
Konsekvenserne af Golf­krigen
Effects of the Gulf War
Efter Golf­krigen ønsker tre ud af fem EF­borgere, at EF skal have en fæl les mi ι i tær interventionsstyrke.
After the Gulf War, three European citizens out of five would like the European Community to have a common military intervention force.
Et endnu större flertal går ind for, at EF skal have en fælles udenr igspolit ik.
Even a greater majority favours the EC having a common foreign policy.
Politisk Union og Økonomisk og Monetær Union
Political Union and Economic and Monetary Union
Tre ud af fem EF­borgere mener, at det vil være "en god ting" at etablere et fælles europæisk statsborgerskab.
The creation of a European citizenship is considered "a good thing" by three out of five Europeans.
Et flertal går ind for, at EF får ansvaret for en fælles sikkerheds­ og forsvarspolitik.
Most are in favour of the EC being responsible for a common policy in matters of security and defence.
Der er også et flertal for, at EF bör være ansvarlig for en fælles udenrigspol it ik.
A majority also thinks that the EC should be responsible for a common foreign policy.
Tre ud af fem EF­borgere går ind for en fælles valuta, og samme andel af borgerne mener, at det vil være en realitet i år 2000.
Three Europeans out of five support a single currency and that same number believes this will be a reality in the year 2000.
Oprettelsen af en fælles europæisk centralbank stöttes af 56X af EF­borgerne.
The creation of a common European Central Bank is supported by 56% of Europeans.
Holdningen til dannelsen af en europæisk union med en regering, der er ansvarlig over for Europa­Parlamentet, har aldrig været mere pos i t i v end nu.
Public support has never been so favourable concerning the formation of a European union with a Government responsible to the European Parliament.
Der er sket en betydelig stigning i antallet af personer, der önsker, at Europa­Parlamentet skal spille en større rolle i fremt iden.
There has been a substantial increase among people in favour of the European Parliament playing a more important role in the future.
Opfattelsen af indvandrerne i EF
Perceptions of Immigration in Europe
Intolerante holdninger over for personer, der Ikke er statsborgere i EF­landene, har en betydelig udbredelse i de fleste EF­lande.
Intolerant attitudes towards non-EC nationals are significant in most Community countries.
EUROBAROMETER, en op in ionsundersögeIse, som gennemföres pá vegne af EF-Kommissionens Generaldirektorat for AV-sektoren, Information, Kommunikation og Kultur, er blevet gennemfort hvert forår og efterår siden september 1973 (EB nr. 0).
EUROBAROMETER public opinion surveys ("standard EUROBAROMETER surveys") have been conducted on behalf of the Directorate-General for Audiovisual, Information, Communication, Culture of the Commission of the European Communities each Spring and Autumn since Autumn 1973 (EB N°0).
I efteråret 1980 blev undersøgelserne udvidet til også at omfatte Grækenland, i efteråret 1985 kom Spanien og Portugal til, og siden efteråret 1990 tillige den tidligere Tyske Demokratiske Republik.
They have included Greece since Autumn 1980, Spain and Portugal since Autumn 1985 and the former German Democratic Republic from Autumn 1990 onwards.
Det normale antal svarpersoner i forbindelse med standard EUROBAROMETER-undersögelsen er 1 000 pr. land.
An identical set of questions is asked to representative samples of the population aged fifteen and over in each country.
Dette gælder dog ikke Luxembourg, hvor 500 spörges, og Det Forenede Kongerige, hvor 1 000 spörges i Storbritannien og 300 i Nordirland.
The standard sample in standard EUROBAROMETER surveys is 1000 people per country except Luxembourg (500) and the United Kingdom (1000 in Great Britain and 300 in Northern Ireland).
Med henblik pá at folge integrationen af de fem nye delstater i det forenede Tyskland og i EF har antallet af svarpersoner siden EUROBAROMETER 34 været 2 000 i Tyskland: 1 000 i det tidligere Vesttyskland og 1 000 i det tidligere Østtyskland.
In order to monitor the integration of the five new Lander into United Germany and the European Community, 2000 persons have been sampled in Germany since EUROBAROMETER 34: 1000 in exGDR and 1000 in ex-FRG.
De undersøgelser, der var grundlaget for EUROBAROMETER nr. 0 til 31, blev gennemført af de nationale institutter, der er medlemmer af "European Omnibus Surveys" (EOS).
EB surveys 0 to 31 were carried out by national institutes belonging to the "European Omnibus Surveys" (EOS).
Udarbejdelsen af spørgeskemaer (i samarbejde med Kommissionens tjeneste for "Meningsmålinger"), den internationale koordination og den første bearbejdning af de statistiske data blev forestået af "Faits et Opinions", der er hjemmehørende i Paris.
The Paris-based "Faits et Opinions", working with the Commission's "Surveys, Research, Analyses" Unit was responsible for finalisation of questionnaires, overall coordination of the survey and the preliminary statistical analysis of the data.
Undersøgelserne fra nr. 32 og opefter er blevet udført af de nationale institutter, der er medlemmer af "INRA (EUROPE) - European Coordination Office".
The surveys from N°32 onwards have been carried out by national institutes associated with the "INRA (EUROPE) - European Coordination Office".
Alle de implicerede institutter er blevet udvalgt pá grundlag af et udbud. De er alle medlemmer af "European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research" (ESOMAR) og overholder dettes normer.
All the institutes involved were selected by tender.
De tal, der fremlægges for EF som helhed, er vægtet i overensstemmelse med størrelsen af de enkelte landes voksne befolkning.
The figures given for the Community as a whole, which are shown in this document, are weighted on the basis of the adult population in each country.
Medmindre andet er angivet, er resultaterne i tabellerne anført i procent.
Unless otherwise specified, tables show percentages.
Hvor procentsatserne ved sammentælling ikke giver nøjagtig 100, men et tal meget tæt pá (f.eks. 99 eller 101), skyldes dette, at tallene er blevet afrundet.
In certain cases, percentages do not always add up exactly to 100% but a number very close to it (e.g. 99 or 101), because of rounding.
Giver sammentællingen betydeligt mere end 100, skyldes det, at der har været flere svarmuligheder.
When certain questions allow for several responses, percentages also add up to more than 100%.
Som det normalt er tilfældet med undersøgelser af denne type, fralægger Kommissionen sig ethvert ansvar for spørgsmål, resultater og kommentarer.
In accordance with normal practice for this type of survey, the Commission disclaims all responsibility for questions, results and commentaries.