natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
• Rådets Forordning (EØF) nr. 1408171 fastsætter en koordinering af medlems­staternes sociale sikrings­ordninger, således at arbejdstagere, som flytter inden for Fællesskabet, ikke mister deres rettighe­der med hensyn til social sikring, når de gør brug af deres ret til fri bevægelig­hed
The Commission's action plan also involves increasing the transparency of the European labour market. The EURES network of experts, who furnish information on job vacancies in the Union's Member States, will be reinforced and given a higher profile for all citizens to see, especially in cross-border regions where it is easy for workers to apply for vacant jobs in the neighbouring State.
Hvilken fremtid har forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71?
Where does Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 go from here?
Det er lige så vigtigt at holde virksomhederne orienteret, således at de er bekendt med mulighederne for at ansætte arbejdskraft fra hele EU.
It is also very important to inform companies and make them aware of the possibilities of recruiting people throughout the European Union.
Kommissionen er ved at igangsætte forskellige foranstaltninger som f.eks. oplysningskampagner og semina­
The Commission is taking various measures, such as information campaigns and seminars in all Member States, to make people aware of their right to free movement and of the potential of a European jobs market.
Den 30. og 31. oktober 1997 blev der afholdt en international konference i Noordwijk aan Zee i Nederlande­ne, hvor dette spørgsmål blev drøftet af eksperter fra forskellige lande i EU.
This is the question which experts from the various European Union countries tackled on 30 and 31 October 1997 at an international conference held at Noordwijk aan Zee in the Netherlands.
Emnet er i allerhøjeste grad aktu­elt: Forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 bør tilpasses de nye former for social beskyttelse (plejeforsikring, efter­løn ... ), udviklingen i metoderne til finansiering af den sociale sikring, ¡sær tendensen til skattefinansiering, og heroverfor står ligeledes problemet vedrørende den stadigt stigende privatisering af den sociale sikring i medlemsstaterne.
This is an issue of burning topicality, and Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 needs to adapt to the new forms of social protection now emerging (care and attendance insurance, pre-retirement schemes, etc.), and to changes in the structures and methods of funding social security, in particular the trend towards the State partially financing employers' contributions to social security. It also needs to respond to the increasing privatisation of social security in Member States.
Sådanne drøftelser vil være drivkraft for den forenkling, som Kommissionen har annonceret i sin handlingsplan.
Reflection on such matters will feed into the simplification measures as announced in the Commission's action plan.
Yderligere oplysninger kan fås ved at rette henvendelse til: Europa­Kommissionen, GDV/D/4 (vedrørende fri bevægelighed) eller GDV E/3 (vedrørende social sikring) 200 rue de la Loi, B­1049 Bruxelles.
For further information, please contact: European Commission, DGVID.4 about free movement or DGV/E.3 about social security Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Brussels
Den Europæiske Socialfond fremmer arbejdskraftens mobilitet
The ESF facilitates worker mobility
Begrebet »indirekte diskriminering« kan illustreres med et tilfælde, som har vakt stor opsigt, og som har haft stor indvirkning på koordineringen af familieydelser: sagen Pinna. Pinna, som var italiensk statsborger, arbejdede og var forsikret i Frankrig, men hans familiemedlemmer var bosat i Italien.
However, the Court held that the 'criterion of residence' was indirectly discriminatory because it led to treatment which disadvantaged migrant workers, who received family benefits lower than those received by workers paying into the same scheme, whose children lived in France.
I henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 udbetalte Frankrig familieydelser for børnene, som var bosat i Italien, svarende til det beløb, der er fastsat i italiensk lovgivning, dvs. i familiemedlemmernes bopælsland, og ansøgerens italienske statsborgerskab spillede således ikke direkte ind.
The aim of the European Social Fund (ESF) is to promote, within the Community, employment opportunities for workers and their geographical and occupational mobility, as well as to make for easier adaptation to industrial progress and changes in production systems, mainly through occupational training and retraining.
• Disse EF-bestemmelser gælder i alle medlemsstaterne af Den Europæiske Union samt på Island, i Norge og Liechtenstein, som sammen med de 15 medlemsstater af EU udgør Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde.
These Community provisions are valid in all European Union Member States as well as Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein, which together with the 15 European Union States make up the European Economic Area.
I 1998 vil den især lægge vægt på projekter, som har til formål at fremme arbejdskraftens mobilitet.
In 1998 it will devote particular attention to projects aimed at promoting labour force mobility.
• Pinna 1, dom af 15. januar 1986, C-41/84; Pinna II, dom af 2. marts 1989, C-359187.
The action plan for free movement of workers can be obtained from the European Commission's documentation service by quoting ref. COM(97) 586.
I henhold til handlingsplanen vil arbejdsmarkedets parter blive opfordret til at forelægge projekter, som skal begrænse følgevirkningerne af de sidste hindringer for den frie bevægelighed og evt. øge den geografiske og erhvervsmæssige mobilitet i forbindelse med strukturomlægninger i industrien.
Furthermore, the action plan makes provision for the two sides of industry to propose projects aimed at overcoming obstacles still hampering free movement and/or at bolstering geographical and occupational mobility in connection with industrial developments and restructuring.
De nærmere regler herfor vil blive fastsat, når arbejdsmarkedets parter i nær fremtid opfordres til at indsende projektforslag.
The specific content of such measures will be spelled out in a call for proposals to be launched very soon.
Hans far arbejdede i Tyskland og døde i 1969 som følge af en arbejdsulykke.
Mr Romero is a Spanish citizen living in Spain whose father worked in Germany and died in 1969 from the consequences of an accident at work.
Romero fik tilkendt en bør nepension fra Tyskland i overensstemmelse med forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
Mr Romero received an orphan's pension paid by Germany, in accordance with Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Men Tyskland ophørte med at udbetale pensionen med den begrundelse, at Romero var fyldt 25 år.
But Germany ceased to pay the pension on the grounds that Mr Romero had turned 25.
Romero ansøgte herefter om en forlængelse, som i henhold til tysk lovgivning kun bevilges fader- og/eller moderløse børn, som har aftjent deres værnepligt i Tyskland.
However, Mr Romero then applied for an extension which — under German law — is granted only to orphans who have completed their military service in Germany.
Romero fik afslag på ansøgningen, og Domstolen fik forelagt spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der er pligt til at ligestille en værnepligt, der er aftjent i Spanien, med en værnepligt, der er aftjent i Tyskland.
His application was rejected and the Court was asked to rule on whether there was an obligation to treat military service served in Spain in the same way as military service done in Germany.
Domstolen fastslog, at ligebehandlingsprincippet forpligter Tyskland til at ligestille værnepligt, der er aftjent i en anden medlemsstat, med tysk værnepligt.
The Court found that the equal treatment principle obliges Germany to treat military service done in another Member State in the same way as German military service.
Romero fik således udbetalt pension, som om han havde aftjent sin værnepligt i Tyskland.
Mr Romero's pension was therefore paid as if he had done his military service in Germany.
Der vil blive oprettet kontaktpunkter i de enkelte medlemsstater for at hjælpe arbejdstagerne med at løse særlige problemer som f.eks. adgang til beskæftigelse inden for den offentlige sektor, afslag på sociale ydelser eller ret til familiesammenføring. føring.
Contact points will be set up in every Member State to help workers resolve specific problems, such as obtaining access to jobs in the public sector, being refused social benefits, or regarding their rights to bring their family over to join them.
Kommissionen vil ligeledes henstille til medlemsstaterne at forenkle administrativ praksis for at begrænse de bureaukratiske hindringer.
The Commission will also encourage Member States to streamline their administrative procedures so as to cut down on red tape.
Bureaukratisk tovtrækkeri for at opnå opholdstilladelse og Domstolens løsningsforslag
Hassle and red tape surrounding right of residence, and the solutions proposed by the Court
Forbud mod diskrimination på grundlag af nationalitet
The ban on discrimination on nationality grounds
Hvad siger EF-retten?
Community law
Sidste år havde Domstolen på ny lejlighed til at tage stilling til spørgsmålet om de formaliteter, som arbejdstagere, der er statsborgere i en medlemsstat i EU, skal opfylde for at få opholdstilladelse, samt om opholdstilladelse for arbejdssøgende.
Last year the Court of Justice had an opportunity to rule afresh on the formalities involved in the award of residence permits to workers who are citizens of a Union Member State and on job-seekers' right of residence.
I modsætning til hvad mange borgere tænker, forbyder EF-retten ikke medlemsstaterne at kræve, at arbejdstagere i EU skal være i besiddelse af en opholdstilladelse.
Contrary to what many citizens believe. Community law does not prohibit Member States from requiring workers who are Union citizens to obtain a residence permit.
Det er imidlertid ikke denne opholdstilladelse, som giver dem opholdsret.
However, their right of residence does not depend on this residence permit.
Det er selve traktaten, som direkte tillægger arbejdstagerne opholdsret.
It is the Treaty itself which directly accords the right of residence to workers.
De øvrige bestemmelser i EF-retten som f.eks. direktiv nr. 360/68/EØF fastsætter fælles regler for udstedelse af opholdstilladelse til arbejdstagere i EU.
Other rules of Community law, such as Directive 68/360/EEC, lay down the common rules for issuing residence permits to workers who are Community citizens.
Ligebehandling er et af de generelle principper i EF-retten og er fastsat i artikel 6 i traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
Equal treatment is a general principle of Community law, enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Dette princip er et væsentligt bidrag i EF-retten til sikring af retsstillingen for Europas borgere, når de gør brug af deres ret til fri bevægelighed inden for Fællesskabet.
This principle is a vital pillar of support under Community law for European citizens' legal position when they exercise their right to free movement within the Community.
Princippet kommer til udtryk i arbejds- og lønvilkår, betingelser vedrørende afskedigelse samt i forbindelse med sociale og skattemæssige fordele.
This principle applies to working conditions, pay, redundancies as well as social and tax advantages.
På området for social sikring er ligebehandlingsprincippet fastsat i artikel 3 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
Equal treatment in the social security field is guaranteed by Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Domstolens retspraksis er inden for EF-retten og især i forbindelse med arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed eller social sikring af afgørende betydning for de juridiske reglers udvikling. ling.
The Court of Justice's Community case-law, particularly concerning workers' freedom of movement or social security, is a vital element in developing the legal rules.
Domstolen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber har fortolket ligebehandlingsprincippet bredt og har fastslået, at ikke blot direkte diskriminering, som åbenlyst er begrundet i nationalitet, er forbudt, men ligeledes indirekte diskriminering.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities has interpreted equal treatment in a broad sense, stating that the ban applies not only to direct forms of discrimination clearly based on nationality, but also to indirect forms.
Kommissionen havde indbragt Belgien for Domstolen med den påstand, at Belgien ikke havde overholdt direktiv nr. 360/68/EØF af tre grunde: 1) Arbejdssøgende var forpligtet til at forlade Belgien efter tre måneder, 2) arbejdstagere, som havde et arbejde af mindst ét års varighed, fik ikke automatisk udstedt en opholdstilladelse på fem år, men skulle derimod forelægge to registreringsattester i løbet af de første seks måneders bopæl og skulle selv betale for disse attester, 3) arbejdstagere, som havde et arbejde af mindre end tre måneders varighed, skulle ligeledes selv fremskaffe en attest.
The Commission took Belgium to the Court of Justice, claiming that it had not complied with Directive 68/360/EEC on three counts, namely: (1) job-seekers were obliged to leave Belgium after three months; (2) workers with contracts lasting at least one year did not automatically receive a five-year residence permit, had to obtain two registration certificates during their first six months of residence, and had to pay for these two certificates; and (3) workers with contracts lasting less than three months also had to obtain a certificate.
Domstolen fastslog, at de belgiske bestemmelser var i mod strid med traktaten (dom af 20.2.1997, C-344/95).
The Court held that the Belgian rules were contrary to the Treaty (judgment of 20 February 1997, C-344/95).
Som følge af denne sag er Belgien forpligtet til at ændre sin lovgivning.
In consequence, Belgium must amend its legislation.
Domstolens anvendelse af princippet: to eksempler inden for den sociale sikring
Court of Justice's approach: two examples involving social security
Domstolen har gentagne gange fastslået, at retten til fri bevægelighed er en grundlæggende rettighed, som ved traktaten er tillagt Europas borgere.
The Court of Justice has repeatedly held that the right to free movement is a fundamental right acknowledged by the Treaty and benefiting Europe's citizens.
Denne rettighed bør derfor fortolkes bredt.
Consequently, this right must be broadly interpreted.
Hvad er indirekte diskriminering?
Mr Pinna, an Italian, worked in France and was insured there, but his family lived in Italy.
Det drejer sig om skjulte former for diskriminering, hvor der diskrimineres på andet grundlag end nationalitet, hvilket i realiteten giver samme resultat.
In accordance with Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, France paid the family benefits for his children living in Italy at the rate provided for under Italian legislation, i.e. that of the State of residence of his family... and the fact of Mr Pinna, the claimant, being Italian did not therefore explicitly come into it.
Sidste nvt
Stop press...
Borgernes rettig iheder, når de flytter inden for EU · Nyhedsbrev nr. 2 ­ 1999
Citizens' rights when moving within the European Union — Bulletin No 2 — 1999
Forordning nr. 1408/71 udvidet til også at omfatte særlige ordninger for tjenestemænd
Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 extended to include special schemes for civil servants
På vej mod et patienternes Europa?
Towards a Europe of patients?
Den 29. juni 1998 vedtog Rådet efter seks års forhandlinger endelig en tekst, som udvidede forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 til også at omfatte særli­ge ordninger for tjenestemænd.
On 29 June 1998, after six years of negotiations, the Council finally adopted a regulation extending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 to include special schemes for civil servants.
Debatten om Kommissionens forslag til forordning, som fremlagdes i 1991, var blevet genoptaget i 1995 efter Vougioukas­dommen (Sag C­443/93), hvori Domstolen slog fast, at Rådet ved ikke at have truffet nogen foranstaltninger til samordning af de særlige ordninger for tjenestemænd havde undladt at opfylde de forpligtelser, som påhviler det i henhold til traktaten.
Discussions on the Commission's proposal for a regulation, presented in 1991, had been relaunched in 1995 following the Vougioukas judgment (Case C-443/93), in which the Court of Justice ruled that the Council had failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty by not adopting any coordinating measures covering special schemes for civil servants.
Dette hul er nu fyldt ud, og tjenestemænds rettigheder i henhold til særlige ordninger, f.eks. vedrorende sundhedsvæsenets tjenesteydelser eller pension, er nu sikret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
This omission has been rectified, and the rights of civil servants covered by special schemes (in the field of health care or pensions, etc.) are now protected by Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Forslag til ændring af bestemmelserne vedrørende arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed
Proposals for changes to the rules on freedom of movement for workers
EF­Domstolens domme i Kohll­ og Decker­sagerne: Anvendelsen af de grundlæggende principper om fri bevægelighed for varer og tjenesteydelser inden for social sikring (godtgørelse af udgifter til sundhedsvæsenets tjenesteydelser)
The Court of Justice's judgments in the Kohll and Decker cases: application of the fundamental principles of free movement of goods and services in the field of social security (reimbursement of medical expenses)
Kommissionen vedtog den 22. juli 1998 en pakke af forslag til retsakter med det formål at ændre og ajourføre bestemmelserne vedrørende betingelserne for arbejdstagernes udøvelse af retten til fri bevægelighed samt arbejdsmarkedets parters deltagelse i behandlingen af spørgsmål vedrørende arbejdstageres frie bevægelighed og sociale sikring O. Forslagene af 22. juli sigter på at ændre forordning nr. 1612/68, hvori betingel­serne for udøvelse af retten til fri bevægelighed er beskrevet, og direktiv 68/360/EØF om rejse og ophold inden for Fællesskabet for medlemssta­ternes arbejdstagere og deres familiemedlemmer.
On 22 July 1998, the Commission adopted a package of legislative measures to amend and update the rules on the conditions for the exercising of freedom of movement by workers and covering participation by the social partners in matters concerning freedom of movement and social security for migrant workers ('). The intention is to amend Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68, which lays down the conditions for exercising freedom of movement, and Directive 68/360 on the movement and residence of Community workers and members of their families.
Pakken af lovforslag indeholder desuden et forslag til Europa­Parlamentets og Rådets afgørelse om nedsættelse af et rådgivende udvalg for EF­arbejdstageres frie bevægelighed og sociale sikring.
The package also includes a proposal for a Council decision establishing an advisory committee on freedom of movement and social security for migrant workers.
Det nye udvalg, som i givet fald skal sammensættes af repræsentanter for medlemsstaterne og for fagforeningerne og arbejdsgiverne i medlemsstaterne, vil skulle erstatte de to eksisterende udvalg for fri bevægelighed og social sikring.
This new committee, which would consist of representatives of the Member States and of the trade unions and employers in the Member States, would replace the two present committees on freedom of movement and social security.
Denne pakke af lovforslag indgår som en del af den strategi, Kommissionen bebudede i sin handlingsplan for arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed fra november 1997(2). Forslagene er sendt til Rådet og Europa­Parlamentet.
This package of legislation is part of the strategy announced by the Commission in its action plan for free movement of workers adopted in November 1997 (2).
• / EF-traktatens artikel 30 er princippet om fri bevæge­lighed for varer på det indre marked knæsat.
• Article 30 of the EC Treaty establishes the principle of free movement of goods within the internal market.
Samordning med henblik på udvidelsen
Coordination in the perspective of enlargement
• / EF-traktatens artikel 59 og 60 slås princippet om fri udveksling af tjenesteydel­ser fast.
• Articles 59 and 60 of the EC Treaty establish the principle of the freedom to provide services.
De to sager vedrørte tvister mellem to luxembourgske statsborgere, henholdsvis Decker og Kohll, og de sygekasser, som de er tilsluttet, om godtgørelsen af udgifter til køb af briller/udførelse af tandlægebehandling i en anden medlemsstat, nemlig henholdsvis Belgien og Tyskland.
The cases concerned disputes between two Luxembourgish nationals, Mr Decker and Mr Kohll, and their health insurance funds, concerning reimbursement of the cost of spectacles purchased and treatment provided in another Member State (Belgium and Germany respectively).
I henhold til den luxembourgske lovgivning er det ikke muligt at få godtgjort udgifter til varer eller lægelige tjenesteydelser, som købes eller udføres uden for Luxembourg, uden at der er indhentet forhåndstilla­delse fra den pågældende sygekasse.
Luxembourgish legislation does not allow reimbursement of the cost of medical products or services purchased or obtained outside Luxembourgish territory without the prior authorisation of the fund concerned.
De berørte havde ikke fået en sådan tilladel­se, som der ikke stilles krav om, når der er tale om køb af varer eller udførelse af tjenesteydelser på Luxembourgs område.
The persons in question had not obtained authorisation, which is not required for products or services purchased or provided on Luxembourgish territory.
Tvisten vedrørte udelukkende statslige sygeforsikringer, og private forsikringsordninger behandledes således ikke.
The dispute related to State health insurance only. Private insurance schemes were not under discussion.
Konklusionerne i Kohll- og Decker-dommene
The Kohll and Decker judgments
• / henhold til artikel 22, stk. 1, litra c), i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 er det
As part of the preparations for enlargement, the Commission organised, under the PHARE Consensus programme of cooperation with the central and east European countries (CEECs), a conference in Riga (Latvia) from 14 to 16 September 1998 on the coordination of social security schemes with a view to enlargement.
Formålet med konferencen var at forberede de central­ og østeuropæiske lande på området samordning af de nationale sociale sikringssystemer.
The aim was to continue the preparation of the CEECs in terms of the coordination of social security schemes.
Allerede i 1997 gennemførtes tre projekter med henblik på at analysere de lovmæssige og administrative aspekter af udvidelsesforberedelserne.
Three projects analysing the legislative and administrative aspects of enlargement preparations had already been carried out in 1997.
Tanken med konferencen i Riga var at udvide uddannelsesindsatsen, så den ikke blot omfatter medarbejderne i de kompetente ministerier, men også alle juridiske erhverv (dommere, advokater) samt arbejdsmarkedets parter og de sociale sikringsinstitutioner, som har en afgørende rolle at spille i forbindelse med beskyttelsen af de rettigheder, som borgerne direkte tildeles ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71.
The objective of the Riga conference was to extend training beyond the staff of the competent ministries to all the legal professions (judges, lawyers) as well as to the social partners and social security institutions which will play a vital role in safeguarding the rights conferred directly on citizens by Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Konferencen skulle ses som et symbolsk skridt og danne forum for en udveksling af erfaringer mellem medlemsstaterne, de central­ og østeuropæiske lande og Kommission, som for forste gang alle var samlet for at drøfte emnet samordning.
The conference should be seen as a symbolic step as well as an opportunity for an exchange of experience among Member States, the CEECs and the Commission, meeting for the first time to discuss the subject of coordination.
30 år med fri bevægelighed for arbejdstagere
30 years of free movement for workers