natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En anden vigtig bestemmelse er den, der står i artikel 102. hvori det hedder: »Senest fra det sjette år efter tiltrædelsen vedtager Rådet, på forslag af Kommissionen, vilkårene for udøvelse af fiskeri...«.
Another important provision is contained in Article 102, which states that 'from the sixth year after accession at the latest, the Council, acting on a proposal from the Com mission, shall determine conditions for fishing (...)'.
I 1976 blev det imidlertid klart, at en række lande — under foregribelse af de endelige resultater af FN's tredje havretskonference — havde til hensigt at udstrække deres fiskeriterritorium til op til 200 sømil fra kysten6).
In 1976, however, it became clear (before the final outcome of the Third United Nations Confer­ence on the Law of the Sea) that more and more countries were planning to extend their fishing limits to as much as 200 nautical miles offshore.6
I den nordlige del af Atlanterhavet havde Island allerede truffet beslutning herom i 1975, medens USA, Canada og Norge i 1976 tilkendegav, at de for deres vedkommende var ved at træffe forberedelse til en udvidelse af deres fiskeriterritorier.
In the North Atlantic, Iceland had taken such a decision in 1975 and in 1976 the United States, Canada and Norway announced that they in turn were preparing to extend their fishing limits.
Under disse omstændigheder overvejede Fællesskabets medlemsstater, hvilken holdning de skulle indtage.
This being the case, the Member States of the Community had to decide what attitude they should adopt.
En ting stod klart, nemlig at det princip om lighed med hensyn til betingelserne for erhvervets udøvelse, der var nedfældet i forordning (EØF) nr. 2141/70. fandt anvendelse på alle havområder, der hørte under medlemsstaternes overhøjhedsområde eller jurisdiktion, og følgelig også på de nye fiskeriområder på maksimalt 200 sømil.
One thing was clear: the principle of equal access as established by Regulation No 2141/70 applied to all maritime waters under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of Member States and, consequently, to the new fishing zones which extended up to 200 nautical miles.
Selv om lighedsprincippet i medfør af de klassiske havretlige regler — hvorefter fiskerizoner højst er på 12 sømil — kun ville få begrænset betydning indtil 1983 på grund af de undtagelsesbestemmelser, der gjaldt vedrørende tolv-sømilegrænserne i medfør af tiltrædelsesakten, ville dette princip få stor betydning inden for rammerne af de nye havretlige regler, der var under udarbejdelse, og hvorved der fastsattes fiskerigrænser på optil 200 sømil.
Under the traditional law of the sea, which provided for fishing zones not exceed­ing 12 nautical miles, the principle of equality had only limited significance until 1983 because of the derogations which would apply to the 12-mile zones until that date under the Act of Accession, but it would be of great importance under the new law of the sea which was being drawn up and would provide for fishing zones of up to 200 nautical miles.
Anvendelsen af dette princip ville nemlig medføre, at der oprettedes en fælles fiskerigrænse uden for tolv-sømilegrænsen beregnet fra kysten.
If this principle had been put into practice, a Community fishing zone would have been established outside the 12-mile limits.
Dette betød ligeledes, at Fællesskabet — dersom medlemsstaterne ønskede at udstrække deres fiskerigrænser — ville være nødsaget til at udarbejde en politik til sikring af bevarelsen af havets biologiske ressourcer.
Moreover, if the Member States decided to extend the limits of their fishing zones, the Community would have to devise a policy for the conservation of marine biological resources.
Afsnit II — En ny fiskeripolitik
Section II — A new fisheries policy
Rådets og Kommissionens bestræbelser
The efforts of the Council and the Commission
Et sådant initiativ var nødvendigt, da ministrene på et særligt møde i Haag den 30. oktober 1976 skulle udarbejde en resolution — der blev vedtaget ved skriftlig afstemning i Rådet den 3. november s.a. — hvori det hed, at medlemsstaterne den 1. januar 1977 inden for rammerne af en samlet aktion udvidede grænserne for deres fiskerizoner i Nordsøen og den nordlige del af Atlanterhavet til 100 sømil fra kysten7).
Such an initiative was necessary, for on 30 October 1976 the ministers attending the special meeting in The Hague were to draw up a resolution (approved via written procedure by the Council on 3 November) to the effect that, as from 1 Jnauary 1977, the Member States should, by means of concerted action, extend the limits of their fishing zones to 200 miles off their North Sea and North Atlantic coasts.7 The resolution also stated that
vedkommende skulle opnå adgang til tredjelandes fiskerizoner ved indgåelse af de fornødne aftaler.
fishing within these zones by nonmember countries would be governed by agreements between the Community and the countries concerned, whilst the Community for its part was to obtain for its own fishermen access to the zones belonging to nonmember coun tries by concluding appropriate agreements with the latter.
1 bilag VI til Haag-resolutionen — der senere skulle vise sig at få stor betydning — fastslog Rådet, at medlemsstaterne ikke matte træffe ensidige foranstaltninger.
In Annex VI to the resolution adopted at The Hague (which was subsequently to be of great importance) the Council stipulated that Member States must not adopt any unilateral measures.
Såfremt man i de internationale fiskerikommissioner eller inden for Fællesskabet ikke nåede frem til en aftale for 1977. kunne medlemsstaterne dog træffe passende foranstaltninger af midlertidig karakter, såfremt der ikke skete nogen forskelsbehandling.
If, however, the measures required for 1977 were not adopted within the framework of international fisheries organizations or at Community level, the Member States were authorized to take appropriate measures, provided that these were temporary and non-discriminatory.
Yderligere skulle medlemsstaterne søge Kommissionens godkendelse.
The Member States were also required to obtain Commission approval.
Til trods for denne resolution var det ikke muligt inden den 1. januar 1977 at få vedtaget fælles regler til bevarelse af de biologiske ressourcer i medlemsstaternes fiskerizoner.
Despite this resolution, it proved impossible to adopt, before 1 January 1977, Com munity measures for the conservation of biological resources in the fishing zones of the Member States.
1 december måned 1976 måtte man derfor beslutte midlertidigt i 1977 at anvende de samme regler som i 1976.
In December 1976, therefore, it was decided as a provisional arrange ment that in 1977 the same measures would apply as in 1976.
Saledes indledtes en periode, i hvilken der herskede usikkerhed med hensyn til den fælles fiskeripolitik, og denne usikkerhed består endnu i dag.
This was the beginning of the uncertainty which has surrounded the common fisheries policy ever since.
For sã virit angår politikken indadtil, er der indtil i dag endnu ikke fastsat endelige regler til trods for. at Kommissionen siden 1977 bestandigt har forelagt Rådet forslag.
As regards internal policy, no final legislation has yet been adopted despite the fact that since 1977 the Commission has submitted several proposals to the Council.
I 1977 var det først og fremmest Irland og Det forenede Kongerige, der modsatte sig Kommissionens forslag, idet disse to lande — i strid med princippet om lige adgangsbetingelser — ønskede anerkendelse af en 50 sømiles fiskerizone, hvortil alene rieres egne fiskere havde adgang.
In 1977 the main opposition to the Commission proposals came from Ireland and the United Kingdom, who requested, in defiance of the principle of equal access, recognition of an exclusive 50-mile fishing zone for their own fishermen.
På et særligt møde på ministerplan, rier blev afholdt i Berlin i januar 1978, enedes otte medlemsstater imidlertid om en aftale angående de væsentligste punkter i en regulering inden for Fællesskabet.
In January 1978, however, at a special ministerial meeting in Berlin, eight Member States agreed on the essential points for an internal settlement. The United Kingdom was unable to support this agreement for the following reasons:
Det forenede Kongerige kunne ikke tilslutte sig denne overenskomst og anførte følgende grunde hertil: a) landet ønskede en eksklusiv 12 sømiles zone uden hensyn til tidligere eksisterende historiske rettigheder, og b) det ønskerie ligeledes at opnå en »dominant preference« for sine egne fiskere, navnlig med hensyn til de forskellige fangstkvoter, inden for en zone fra 12 til 50 sømil.
(a) it requested an exclusive fishing zone of 12 nautical miles without recognition of pre-existing historic rights; (b) it requested 'dominant preference' for its own fishermen in a zone extending from 12 to 50 nautical miles, particularly where the various quotas were concerned.
Denne indstilling har hidtil været til hinder for. at der er blevet truffet nogen som helst afgørelse med hensyn til reguleringen inden for Fællesskabet.
The UK position has so far prevented any decision being taken on internal arrangements.
Dette betyder dog ikke. at der ikke er sket noget på dette område siden 1976.
This does not mean, however, that nothing has happened in the fisheries sector since 1976.
Der er nemlig siden 1976 sket ændringer i tingenes tilstand ved midlertidige foranstaltninger, nationale foranstaltninger, overgangsbestemmelser og ordninger vedrørende visse mindre kontroversielle spørgsmål.
The 1976 situation has been altered by temporary measures, national measures, transitional measures and arrangements concerning less controversial matters.
I 1977 blev der truffet adskillige midlertidige foranstaltninger, hvoriblandt den vigtigste var forbudet mod fiskeri af visse sildebestande, der var særligt truet.
In 1977, several temporary measures were adopted, the most important being the ban on the fishing of certain herring stocks which were particularly threatened.
Herudover blev der truffet foranstaltninger med hensyn til anvendelse af visse fangstredskaber og omfanget af bifangster.
Measures were also taken on the use of certain types of fishing gear and on the size of bycatches.
Alle riisse foranstaltninger var af midlertidig karakter, men de fleste er blevet — og bliver stadig — forlænget.
All these measures were of a temporary nature but their validity has been (and still is being) regularly extended.
Den manglende enighed i Rådet angående den fælles fiskeripolitik — bl. a. vedrørende fangstkvoter— har således ikke ført til en fuldstændig fastlåsning af situationen, som den forelå i året 1976.
Although the Council has failed to reach agreement on the common fisheries policy, particularly as regards quotas, the situation has accordingly changed somewhat since the end of 1976.
Dette følger også af det system inden for de nationale foranstaltninger, der har fundet anvendelse siden 1978 på grundlag af ovennævnte bilag VI til Haag-resolutionen fra udgangen af 1976.
Another factor has been the system of national measures applied since 1978 and based on the abovementioned Annex VI to the Hague Resolution which was adopted in late 1976.
Siden 1978 har medlemsstaterne været forpligtet til at forelægge Kommissionen til godkendelse de nationale foranstaltninger, som de ønsker at træffe.
Since 1978 the Member States have been required to submit any planned national measures for the prior approval of the Commission, which examines such measures in the light of the criteria defined in Annex VI.
er nedfældet i bilag VI. I betragtning af, at otte medlemsstater i almindelighed accepterer Kommissionens forslag, giver vedtagelsen af nationale foranstaltninger normalt ikke anledning til problemer.
generally speaking, in agreement with the Commission proposals, the adoption of national measures does not usually give rise to any problems.
For så vidt angår Det forenede Kongerige har Kommissionen derimod mattet nægte at godkende visse nationale foranstaltninger, hvilket har givet anledning til at indlede proceduren efter EØFT artikel 169.
On the other hand, the Commission has had to withhold its approval from certain UK national measures, with subsequent initiation of the procedure provided for in Article 169 of the Treaty.
Det har på denne måde i hvert fald været muligt at undgå, at man som følge af nødvendigheden af at træffe visse foranstaltninger kom til at gøre indgreb i det grundlag, på hvilket den fælles fiskeripolitik til sin tid skal udarbejdes.
In this way it has at least been possible to prevent the adoption of certain measures from undermining the foundations on which the common fisheries policy must one day be based.
I begyndelsen af 1979 viste det sig muligt at gå ind i en ny etape. På dette tidspunkt fastsatte Rådet overgangsbestemmelser8). hvorefter medlemsstaterne skulle sørge for, at de fangster, som foretoges af deres fiskerfartøjer, var i overensstemmelse med de af Kommissionen fastsatte regler vedrørende de samlede tilladte fangster og de procentvise andele i fangsterne, der var forbeholdt tredjelande.
Early in 1979 an opportunity arose to break new ground when the Council adopted interim measures8whereby the Member States were to conduct their fisheries in such a way that the catches of their vessels were consistent with the total annual catches proposed by the Commission and with the share of such catches allocated to nonmember countries.
I disse bestemmelser hedder det tillige, at medlemsstaterne fortsat skal anvende de tekniske regler vedrørende bevarelse og kontrol, som gjaldt den 3. november 1976. samt nationale foranstaltninger i overens stemmelse med bestemmelserne i bilag VI til Haag-resolutionen.
It was also stipulated that the Member States should continue to apply the same technical measures for the conservation and surveillance of fishery resources as had been applicable on 3 November 1976 and the national measures taken in accordance with Annex VI to the Hague Resolution.
Også disse overgangsbestemmelser er siden konstant blevet forlænget.
Since 1979, the period of validity of these interim arrangements has also been regularly extended.
I begyndelsen af 1980 kunne der i Rådet opnås enighed om de samlede tilladte fangster og om visse foranstaltninger til registrering af fangster.
Early in 1980 the Council reached agreement on total allowable catches and on certain measures relating to the recording of catches.
1 løbet af 2. halvår af 1980 blev der indgået en principiel aftale vedrørende visse tekniske regler (bl.a. om maskestørrelser og yderligere fangstkvoter) samt foranstaltninger til overvågning af, om fiskerne overholder de gældende bestemmelser.
During the second half of 1980, agreement in principle was reached on certain technical measures (mesh sizes, by-catches, etc.) and on measures to ensure that fishermen complied with the legislation in force.
Fiskeripolitikken udadtil står ligeledes over for problemer.
The external fisheries policy has also been faced with problems.
I betragtning af. at de aftaler, der er omhandlet i Haag-resolutionen, ikke har kunnet indgås på kort sigt, har tredjelandes fiskeri i medlemsstaternes fiskerizoner siden begyndelsen af 1977 været reguleret ved autonome fællesskabsforanstaltninger.
Since the agree ments provided for in the Hague Resolution could not be concluded in the short term, the fishing activities of nonmember countries in the fishing zones of Member States have been governed by autonomous Community measures since the beginning of 1977.
Der er dog blevet indledt forhandlinger med et stort antal lande med henblik pa indgåelse af rammeaftaler, dvs. aftaler til fastsættelse af visse procedurer for vedtagelse af årlige ordninger angående (gensidige) fiskerirettigheder.
Negotiations have, however, begun with a large number of countries, with a view to concluding outline agreements, i.e. agreements laying down the procedures for annual arrangements on reciprocal fishing rights.
For så vidt angår tredjelandenes stilling i forhold til Fællesskabet er det værd at bemærke, at der i 1977 også fandt forhandlinger sted med visse lande i Østeuropa.
As regards the attitude of nonmember countries towards the Community, it should be noted that in 1977 negotiations were also held with some Eastern European countries.
Disse forhandlinger førte dog ikke til konkrete resultater, hvilket bevirkede, at Fællesskabet fastsatte en tidsmæssig grænse for disse landes fiskeri i medlemsstaternes farvande.
These negotiations failed to achieve any specific results, however, and the Community brought to an end the fishing activities of these countries in the maritime waters of the Member States.
Derimod er der opnået resultater med andre lande.
Positive results were, however, achieved in negotiations with other coun tries.
I 1979 førte forhandlinger med Senegal og Guinea-Bissau til udkast til aftaler, i henhold til hvilke Fællesskabet opnåede fiskerirettigheder mod økonomisk kompensation.
In 1979, the negotiations with Senegal and Guinea-Bissau led to draft agreements where by the Community obtained fishing rights in exchange for financial compensation.
Til trods for alle disse forhandlinger er kun et begrænset antal aftaler i kraft mellem Fællesskabet og tredjelande.
Despite all these negotiations, only a limited number of fisheries agreements exist between the Community and nonmember countries.
Ud over ovennævnte aftale med USA findes der to aftaler af kortere varighed med Canada '").
agreement with the United States, there are two shortterm agreements with Canada.
Dette skyldes, at Det forenede Kongerige finder, at der principielt ikke kan indgås nogen aftale med tredjelande, så længe man ikke har fastlagt en politik for fiskeriet i Fællesskabets egne farvande. Derfor har visse aftaler længe ikke kunnet undertegnes "). medens andre aftaler — der allerede var underskrevet — ikke har kunnet godkendes12).
10 This derives from the fact that the United Kingdom considers that, as a matter of prin ciple, no agreement should be concluded with nonmember countries until an internal fisheries policy has been defined.
Denne situation er naturligvis ikke særlig gavnlig for Fællesskabets internationale troværdighed.
This situation is, of course, harmful to the international credibility of the Community.
De fleste af disse rammeaftaler anvendes dog af de (fremtidige) parter, selv om det sker foreløbigt og de facto.
Admittedly, most of these outline agreements are being applied by the (future) signatories, although on a provisional basis and as a de facto arrangement.
Der finder derfor regelmæssige konsultationer sted vedrørende gensidige fiskerirettigheder således som fastlagt ved den gældende rammeaftale.
Consultations are regularly held on reciprocal fishing rights as provided for in the outline agreements.
Disse rådslagninger fører til (formelt) autonome foranstaltninger.
These consultations give rise, in turn, to formally autonomous measures.
Fællesskabet har ligeledes optaget multilaterale forhandlinger på fiskeriområdet. Disse forhandlinger har medført, at Fællesskabet er blevet deltager i en traktat vedrørende multilateralt samarbejde på fiskeriområdet i den nordvestlige del af Atlanterhavet.
The Community has also entered into multilateral negotiations on fisheries questions and has, as a result, become a party to a treaty on multilateral cooperation on fishing in the North-West Atlantic.
For så vidt angår den østlige del af Atlanterhavet er der blevet underskrevet en ny traktat den 18. november 1980. selv om Sovjetunionen i begyndelsen nægtede at anerkende Fællesskabet som sådant som deltager i en ny traktat.
A new treaty concerning the North-East Atlantic was signed on 18 November 1980, although the Soviet Union was initially reluctant to acknowledge the Community as a signatory.
Fællesskabet har ligeledes til hensigt at indtræde som medlem af andre multilaterale organisationer på fiskeriområdet '4).
The Community also plans to join other multilateral organizations dealing with fishery matters. 14
Endnu inden det i slutningen af 1976 blev besluttet at udvide fiskerizonerne, havde Domstolen fået forelagt problemet om Fællesskabets kompetence vedrørende fiskeri.
Even before the decision on the extension of fishing zones was taken in late 1976, the Court has been confronted with the problem of the Community's competence on fisheries.
1 begyndelsen af 1976 anmodede to nederlandske domstole om præjudicielle afgørelser, navnlig af om Fællesskabet har en enekompetence, der bevirker, at det kan påtage sig internationale forpligtelser på fiskeriområdet.
At the beginning of 1976, two Netherlands judges requested a preliminary ruling as to whether the Community had exclusive powers to contract international obligations in the fisheries sector.
1 sin dom af 14. juli 1976 i de forenede sager 3, 4 og 6/76l5) — den såkaldte Kramer-sag — fandt Domstolen, at »Fællesskabet (internt) har kompetence til at træffe foranstaltning til bevaring af havets biologiske ressourcer«, og endvidere at denne lovgivningskompetence »omfatter— for sa vidt som staterne ifølge international offentlig ret har en tilsvarende kompetence — også fiskeri på det åbne hav«.
In its ruling of 14 July 1976 in the Kramer case 15 (Joined Cases 3, 4 and 6/76), the Court found that the Community had 'on the internal level, the power to take any measures for the conservation of the biological resources of the sea' and that this rule-making authority also extended '—in so far as the Member States have similar authority under public international law—to fishing on the high seas'.
I betragtning af. at bevaringen af havets biologiske ressourcer alene kan sikres på effektiv og rimelig vis gennem en ordning, som forpligter alle de pågældende stater, herunder tredjelande, kom Domstolen til det resultat, at Fællesskabet er beføjet til at påtage sig internationale forpligtelser til bevaring af havets biologiske ressourcer.
Since fishery legislation cannot be effective or equitable unless it is also binding on nonmember countries, the Court concludes that the Community has authority to enter into international commitments for the conservation of the biological resources of the sea.
"') En aitale lor 1979 trådte endeligt i krall den 4.12.1979. medens der blev underskrevet to aftaler i januar 198(1 l'or aret 1980; jfr. EF-Bull. 12-1979. pkt. 2.1.119 og EF-Bull. 1-1980. pkt. 2.1.56.
The Court also considers that the Community has not yet 'fully exercised its functions in the matter' and concludes that the Member States also have the power to enter into international commitments of this kind.
16, 33, 47 og 51. forordninger om indgåelse af aftaler mcd Norge. Guinea-Bissau. Sverige.
An agreement for 1979 finally came into force on 4 December 1979 and in January 1980 two agreements were signed for 1980; Bull.
Faerøerne, Senegal tig Canada
Agreements with Sweden, the Faeroe Islands and Senegal.
") Vedrørende fiskeriel i Østersoen. tunfiskeriet i Atlanterhavet og fiskeriet i de antarktiske tarvande.
OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, pp. 1, 7, 11, 16, 33, 47 and 51 ; regulations on the conclusions of agreements with Norway, Guinea-Bissau, Sweden, the Faeroe Islands, Senegal and Canada.
I5) Dom al' 14.7.1976. forenede sager 2. 3.
Baltic fisheries, tunny-fisheries in the Atlantic and Antarctic fisheries.
Dommen var væsentlig, fordi den fastlagde Fællesskabets beføjelser, inden den politiske beslutningsproces vedrørende den nye fælles fiskeripolitik indledtes, og den har under alle omstændigheder haft til følge, at der blev fastlagt en mere præcis juridisk ramme for de beslutninger, som skulle træffes.
This ruling was important in that it defined the powers of the Community before any political decisions were taken concerning the new common fisheries policy. It at least provided a more sharply-defined legal framework in which decisions could be taken.
I 1977 fik Domstolen påny forelagt en sag vedrørende fiskeriet.
In 1977 another fisheries case was referred to the Court.
I april samme år havde Irland ensidigt besluttet at forbyde visse fartøjer at drive fiskeri i en zone vest for den irske kyst.
In July that year, Ireland had unilaterally decided to prohibit certain vessels from fishing within a zone to the west of Ireland.