natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
• Importkontingenter for oksekød: Rådets be slutning om fordeling mellem medlemsstater ne')
It also set up a special unit to coordinate Com munity activities for the handicapped, and took measures to reorganize the Directorate-General for Science, Research and Develop ment.
• AVS-sukker: Rådet bemyndiger Kommissionen til at genoptage forhandlingerne2)
Discussions, policy debates and work in hand
Tekstiler-MFA : udveksling af synspunkter
The Commission discussed the disappointing outcome of the Foreign Ministers' informal May mandate meetings held on 14, 15 and 25 January.
• 1982-budgettet: drøftelse af situationen og af betingelserne for vedtagelsen i Parlamentet3)
It looked at the budget situation in the light of the Council's discussions on 21 De cember, confirming that it regarded the 1982 budget as duly adopted and would implement it accordingly, particularly as regards calls for funds from the Member States.
• Polen: Rådet beslutter at standse salget af levnedsmidler på særlige vilkår4)
It will be looking carefully at the proposed measures of which it has been notified, and at any future plans.
Rubrikken »Landbrugspolitik«.
The Commission held four meet ings in January.
) Rubrikken »Finansiering af Fællesskabets aktiviteter«.
The Commission also considered a proposal to amend Article 8 of the Supplementary Protocol to the EEC-Portugal Agreement, which deals with preserved sardines, and de cided to recommend that the Council authorize negotiations.
Midlertidig varetagelse af forretningsområde
Its view was that Community rules prevented use of aids for commercial purposes. poses.
Virksomhed i Generaldirektoratet for forskning, videnskab og udvikling (GD XII/CCR).
The Commission discussed the procedures for implementing the fisheries agreements and international conventions on the conser­vation and management of live marine re­sources, and took note of the state of the talks with The Faeroes and the negotiations with the Spanish authorities.
Trufne afgørelser og beslutninger: vedtagne meddelelser og forslag
Born 10 April 1928 Married, 4 children PhD, and degree in economics
Udveksling af synspunkter: vejledende debatter og igangværende arbejde
Relations with workers' and employers' organizations
Kommissionen havde en udveksling af synspunkter om de — skuffende — resultater af de uformelle møder mellem udenrigsministrene om mandatet, den 14., 15. og 25. januar.
Mr Davignon met the two sides of the textile industry to brief them on the re­newal of the Multifibre Arrangement.
For så vidt angår budgettet foretog Kommissionen en undersøgelse af situationen i lyset af ud talelserne i Rådet den 21. december.
Entered German Foreign Ministry Deputy Chef de Cabinet to Walter Hallstein, President of the EEC Commission Senior official (Ministerialdiri­gent) in Federal Chancellor's Of­fice, Bonn Deputy Secretary-General of the Commission Director-General for Develop­ment
Den erindrede om, at den betragtede budgettet for regnskabsåret 1982 som vedtaget, og at den følgelig vil gennemføre det, herunder den del, der gælder indkaldelse af bidrag hos medlemsstaterne.
Mr Contogeorgis received a delegation from the Union of Industries of the European Community, who presented a memorandum setting out industrial users' views on the common transport policy.
Kommissionen understregede ved denne lejlighed, at selv om den anerkender det formålstjenlige i en samlet be dømmelse af den seneste udvikling med hensyn til »mandatet«, havde den lagt vægt på beslutsomt at påtage sig sit ansvar med hensyn til pris forslag.
During the preliminary consulta­tions ETUC representatives discussed the common agricultural policy, training, con­sumer protection and the Social Fund.
Under redegørelsen for USA's ophævelse af »trigger price system« efter klager fra amerikanske stålfirmaer oplyste Kommissionen, at den ville bestræbe sig på at sikre overholdelsen af de forpligtelser, man havde påtaget sig inden for GATT.
Born 23 March 1931 Married, 3 children Degree in economics, qualified interpreter adversely affected by national legal provi­sions which are incompatible with Commun­ity law or by the implementation of an un­lawful Community act could bring an action in the context of the Community legal order before a national court for a ruling prohibit­ing the application of the measures contra­vening Community law.
Den mener, at Fællesskabets disciplin med hensyn til støtte udelukker, at denne anvendes til kommercielle formål.
The Court considered, however, that the system
I øvrigt bemærkede den, at undersøgelsen af de forskellige former for afgiftsfrihed i den internationale trafik og i trafikken inden for Fællesskabet vil blive fortsat.
For more detailed information, see the texts pub­ lished by the Court of Justice in the Official Journal and the European Court Reports, and the publications of its Information Office (e.g. the annual synopsis of the work of the Court or the information quarterly).
Endelig vedtog Kommissionen beretningen om markedsforholdene på landbrugsområdet i 1981 ; den oprettede en specialenhed til samordning af Fællesskabets virksomhed til gunst for handicappede og foretog en omlægning af tjenestegrenene
1958-60 Commission official; conference interpreter 1960-63 Principal administrator, Direc­torate-General for Competition 1963-68 Assistant to the Director-General for Development 1968-77 Head of various divisions in the Directorate-General for Develop­ment 1977-82 Director, Directorate-General for Budgets 26 January Appointed Director-General for 1982 Development
G. Contogeorgis, det medlem af Kommissionen, der som forretningsområde har transport, har modtaget en delegation fra Sammenslutningen af Industri- og Arbejdsgiverorganisationer i De europæiske Fællesskaber (UNICE), der overrakte ham et memorandum om industrisektorens overvejelser om den fælles transportpolitik.
In Case 158/806the Court also reaffirmed its earlier judgments concerning the inter­pretation of Article 28 of the EEC Treaty, in which it had ruled that it is for the Council to determine the duty­free arrangements for which certain products are eligible by way of derogation from the Common Customs Tariff:7once the Council has adopted rules of uniform application in a particular area, the Member States have no further power to grant duty­free admission in excess of that provided by the Community rules.
Under de foreløbige høringer behandle de repræsentanterne for Den europæiske Sammenslutning af Fagforeninger den fælles land brugspolitik, den faglige uddannelse, forbrugerbeskyttelsen og Socialfonden.
Such measures must, moreover, be urgent in the sense that it is necessary for them to be ordered and to take effect before the Court takes a decision on the merits in order to prevent serious and irreparable damage being caused to the applicant.
Generaldirektoratet for udvikling
Joined Cases 60/81 R and 190/81R IBM ν Commis­ sion: not yet reported.
Domstolen bemærkede først, at det — selv om der ved traktaten er skabt en række muligheder for direkte søgsmål, som private i påkommende tilfælde kan rejse for
Case 136/80 Hudig Pieters ν Minister voor land- bouw en visserij: not yet reported.
Chef for forskellige afdelinger i Generaldirektoratet for udvikling
Others: not yet reported.
Direktør i Generaldirektoratet for budgetter
Rewe ν HZA Kiel: not yet reported.
') Nærmere oplysninger offentliggøres af Domstolen i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende og i Samling af Domstolens Afgørelser samt i de publikationer, der udgives af Dom stolens informationskontor (Herunder » Årsoversigten over arbejdet ved Domstolen« eller de bulletiner, som udgives kvartalsvis).
The order states that, in the case in point, the applicant's submissions essentially amount to an assertion that the acts of the Commission are vitiated by defects so mani­fest and serious that they appear to be with­out even a prima facie legal basis and in fact constitute what, in the administrative law of certain Member States, are termed voies de fait administratives (flagrant administrative irregularities). The nature and gravity of these unlawful acts in themselves involve a need to suspend the proceeding.
27. januar 1982 Udnævnt til generaldirektør for udvikling
The Court held that, without prejudice to the admiss­ibility and the merits of the main actions,
2) EF-Domstolen, 7.7.1981 (Rewe/HZA Kiel, 158/80) endnu ikke offentliggjort.
Case 8/73 HZA Bremerhaven ν Massey-Ferguson [1973] ECR 897; Seventh General Report, point 584. 8OJ L 191, 5.8.1969.
Domstolen — ikke har været meningen at skabe andre søgsmålsmuligheder ved de nationale domstole med henblik på gennemførelsen af fællesskabsretten end dem, som findes i national ret.
The Court held that that Regulation applied only to travellers from non-member coun­tries and that a person who, in the course of a sea voyage, has not called at a port in a non-member country cannot be regarded as such a traveller.
Derimod finder Domstolen, at den retsbeskyttelsesordning, som er gennemført ved traktaten, og som navnlig kommer til udtryk i artikel 177, indebærer, at enhver søgsmålstype, som findes i national ret, skal kunne anvendes til sikring af overholdelsen af de fællesskabsregler, som har direkte virkning, under de samme admitteringsbetingelser og efter de samme regler for sagens videre behandling, som gælder, når der er tale om at sikre overholdelsen af national ret.
On the Court's construc­tion, the Regulation applies to the travellers concerned regardless of the origin and source of the goods imported and of the cus­toms duties and taxes imposed on them prior to importation.
Denne dom ligger på linje med den fortolkning, der er skitseret af Domstolen i sag 152/79 ')·
On the basis of this in­terpretation and the finding that Council Regulation (EEC) No 3023/77 of 20 De­cember 19771 was void because it lacked an adequate statement of reasons, the Court held that the 'butter trips' practised in the Federal Republic of Germany in particular were incompatible with Community law.
Domstolen har i referenceperioden ta get stilling til en række sager angående nomenklaturen til den fælles toldtarif3), transithandel4) og opkrævning af told 5).
The Court was also asked to give a number of preliminary rulings on the com­patibility of certain national measures with Articles 30 to 36 of the EEC Treaty.
Domstolen har ligeledes i sag 158/806) bekræftet sin tidligere retspraksis med hensyn til fortolkning af EØF-traktatens artikel 28, hvorefter det tilkommer Rådet af træffe afgørelse om, hvor vidt der for visse produkters vedkommende kan indrømmes toldfritagelse som undtagelse fra den fælles toldtarif7): når først Rådet inden for el bestemt område har indført ensartede regler, har medlemsstaterne ikke længere kompetence til at indrømme toldfritagelse i videre omfang end
The Court concluded that the EEC Treaty rules on the free movement of goods, including the provisions of Article 36, must be inter­preted as barring the owner of a patent for a medicinal product who sells that product in one Member State where patent rights exist and then markets it himself in another Member State where such rights do not exist from using the right conferred on him by the law of the first Member State in order to prohibit the marketing in that State of the product imported from the other Member State.
Virksomheden havde frem sat denne anmodning i forbindelse med et annulationssøgsmål vedrørende meddelelsen om klagepunkterne og de retsakter, hvorved Kommissionen havde indledt en procedure i henhold til artikel 3 i Rådets forordning (EØF) 17/62 for overtrædelse af EØF-traktatens artikel 862).
In Case 155/802the Court was asked to rule on the compatibility with Articles 30 to 36 of the Treaty of national measures prohibit­ing the manufacture and delivery at night of bakery products.
Virksomheden anmodede Domstolen om som foreløbig forholdsregel at suspendere den administrative procedure, der var indledt af Kommissionen og at udsætte gennemførelsen af de retsakter, hvis gyldighed den bestred i hovedsagen.
Reaffirming the interpret­ation given in Case 15/79,3the Court held, as regards the ban on manufacturing at night, that Article 34 applied to national measures whose object or effect was specifi­cally to restrict the volume of exports and thus to establish a difference in treatment between a Member State's domestic and ex­port trade, so as to accord a particular ad­vantage to domestic production or the inter­nal market in the State concerned.
Domstolen henviste i sin foreløbige kendelse indledningsvis til sin faste retspraksis, hvorefter foreløbige forholdsregler kun kan træffes, så fremt de umiddelbart forekommer berettigede ud fra de påberåbte faktiske og retlige omstændigheder.
The Court therefore found that the ban on the manufacture at night of bakery products was not caught by the prohibition in Article 34.
Desuden skal de være uopsættelige i den forstand, at det er nødvendigt, at de iværk sættes, og får virkning inden sagens realitet på kendes, således at det undgås, at den part, der anmoder herom, lider alvorlig og uoprettelig skade.
As regards the ban on the delivery of such products at night, the Court found that, since it applied only to deliveries to retail outlets and individual consumers, it did not affect transport and deliveries to warehouses or intermediaries.
4) EF-Domstolen, 17.9.1981 (Hudig Pieters/Minister voor Landbouw en Visserij, 136/80) — endnu ikke offentliggjort.
3409; Thirteenth General Report, point 612.
- endnu ikke offentliggjort. 7) EF-Domstolen, 12.7.1973 (HZA
4Case 1/81 Pfizer ν Eurim Pharm: not yet reponed.
1973, s. 897; Syvende Almindelige Beretning, nr. 584.
5Merck ν Stephar: not yet reported.
Domstolen har endvidere fastslået5), at man ikke med hjemmel i artikel 36 kan påberåbe sig retten til et varemærke for herved at for hindre en importør i at markedsføre et farmaceutisk produkt, der er fremstillet i en anden medlemsstat af et datterselskab tilhørende varemærkeindehaveren, og som med dennes samtykke er forsynet med hans varemærke, når forholdet er det, at den pågældende importør blot har reemballeret det omhandlede produkt ved at er statte den ydre emballage uden at ændre den indre indpakning, og det af fabrikanten på den ydre emballage påsatte varemærke er synliggjort på emballagen, samtidig med at det klart er angi vet herpå, at produktet er blevet fremstillet af varemærkeindehaverens datterselskab, og at importøren har ompakket produktet.
With regard to the form in which the individual decisions setting the quotas were issued, the Court found in the Krupp judgment that it was not essential for their validity that the decisions should meet the detailed formal requirements prescribed by Decision No 22/603where the decisions were clearly in implementation of the quota scheme established by a general decision which itself had met those requirements. On the statements of reasons given in the indi­vidual decisions, which were confined to in­dications of the reference production level and production quota of each firm based on figures supplied by the firm itself and using methods of calculation set out in Decision No 2794/80, the Court confirmed that the statement of reasons could be concise pro­vided it did not deprive the applicant of the opportunity of checking that the rules laid down by the general decision had been prop­erly applied or prevent the Court from car­rying out its judicial review.
I det foreliggende tilfælde var der tale om fortolkning af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1544/69 af 23. juli 1969 '.) om toldbehandling af varer, der indføres af rejsende i deres personlige bagage.
The Commission informed IBM that it had initiated a proceeding against it for suspected infringements of Article 86 in the computer market.
Domstolen ud talte, at denne forordning kun finder anvendelse på rejsende, der kommer fra tredjelande, og en person, som under en sørejse ikke har gjort op hold i et tredjeland, kan ikke anses for en rejsende i nævnte forordnings forstand.
IBM thereupon ap­plied to the Court of Justice to declare void the measures taken by the Commission in­itiating the proceeding and adopting the statement of objections. In its judgment deli­vered on 11 November6the Court held the action inadmissible.
Ifølge Dom stolens fortolkning finder forordningen anvendelse på de pågældende rejsende uden hensyn til de importerede varers oprindelse og herkomst og uanset den told og de afgifter, de er blevet pålagt før deres indførsel.
Such an action might make it necessary for the Court to rule on questions on which the Commission had not yet taken a final decision, which would be contrary to the separation of powers be­tween the Commission and the Court.
Ved denne fortolkning og ved at erklære Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3023/77 af 20. december 1977 2) for ugyldig som folge af utilstrækkelig begrundelse, har Domstolen hermed fastslået, at de såkaldte »smottine«, der navnlig finder sted i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland, var uforenelige med fællesskabsretten. ten.
The measures in question did not affect the com­pany's legal position or prejudice its inter­ests. The commencement of a proceeding and the notification of the Commission's ob­jections were only preliminary steps in a proceeding and consequently were not open to an action for annulment.
Domstolen har endvidere i en række præjudicielle sager taget stilling til spørgsmålet om visse nationale foranstaltningers forenelighed med EØF-traktatens artikler 30 til 36.
In the field of right of establish­ment, the Court delivered a judgment7 which, for the first time, interprets Council Directive 75/362/EEC concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in medicine, including measures to facilitate
Endelig udtalte Domstolen i sag 187/806) som svar på et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artiklerne 30 til 36, at det følger af patentets særlige genstand, at den væsentlige kerne i patentretten især består i, at der tildeles opfinderen en eneret til, som den første at bringe produktet i omsætning.
As regards the relationship between the general decision and individual decisions made under it, the Court, confirming pre­vious rulings, held in the Krupp case that the applicant bringing an action for the annul­ment of an individual decision addressed to him may challenge the legality only of such provisions of the general decision as are ac­tually implemented by the individual deci­sion.
1979, s. 3409; Trettende Almindelige
In Case 172/804 the Court affirmed
I sag 155/803) blev Domstolen anmodet om at lage stilling til, om nationale bestemmelser, der forbyder fremstilling og udbringning af bageriog konditorvarer i nattetimerne, var forenelige med EØF-traklalens artikler 30 og 34.
4Züchner ν Bayerische Vereinsbank AG: not yet re­ ported. s Second Report on Competition Policy, point 51 et whether the debiting by banks, or at least by most of them, of a uniform bank charge on transfers from one Member State to another of sums from their customers' funds was a concerted practice prohibited by Article 85(1).
Domstolen fastslog derfor, at forbudet mod at fremstille bageri- og konditorvarer i nattetimerne ikke var omfattet af forbudet i artikel 34.
The Court held that it might well be so: parallel conduct such as that of the seq. 6Case 60/81 IBM ν Commission: not yet reported.
Domstolen fandt derfor, at en sådan ordning ikke ville bevirke nogen begrænsning af endnu ikke offentliggjort.
Case 246/80 C. Broekmeulen ν Huisarts Registratie Commissie: not yet reported.
Kommissionen meddelte endvidere virksomheden IBM, at den havde indledt en procedure mod IBM i anledning af en formodet overtrædelse af artikel 86 inden for edb-sekto-ren.
The transaction took place at a time when as a result of the possi­bility of advance fixing of accession monet­ary compensatory amounts it was profitable for the exporter first to ship the wheat to the United Kingdom, unload it and complete the import formalities, and then reload it on the same ships for shipment to its final desti­nation in Germany.
IBM anlagde herefter sag ved Domstolen med påstand om annulation af de retsakter, hvorved Kommissionen indledte proceduren og tilstillede selskabet en meddelelse om klage punkter.
During the criminal pro­ceedings pending on the case in Denmark, the question was raised whether the Danish authorities were entitled to refuse the MCAs for export from Denmark to the United Kingdom.
Ved dom af 11. november6) afviste Domstolen sagen.
In answer to a request for a pre­liminary ruling, the Court held that they were.
Domstolen var nemlig af den opfattelse, at et sådant søgsmål kunne tvinge Domstolen til at tage stilling til spørgsmål, hvor om Kommissionen endnu ikke har hafl lejlighed til at udtale sig, hvilket ville være uforeneligt med den kompetencefordeling, der belår mellem Kommissionen og Domstolen.
Referring to the objectives of the MCA system, the Court interpreted the pro­visions on this subject as meaning that the completion of customs formalities in the Member State declared as the country of destination (in this case the United King­dom) was not sufficient to found a claim to the MCAs.
De anfægtede retsakter indvirker ikke på virksomhedena retsstilling og krænker ej heller dennes interesser.
It is also necessary for the pro­ducts actually to be placed on the market in that State.
2) EF-Domstolen, 28.10.81 (Krupp Staht/Kommissionen, forenede sager 275/80 og 24/81) — endnu ikke offentlig gjort. 3) EFT 61 af 29.9.1960. 4) EF-Domstolen, 14.7.1981 (Züchner/Bayerische Vereins bank AG, 172/80) — endnu ikke offentliggjort. 5) Anden Beretning om Konkurrencepolitikken, nr. 51 ff
Similarly Case 115/78 Knoors [1979] ECR 399.
6) EF-Domstolen, 11.11.1981 (IBM/Kommissionen, 60/61) — endnu ikke offentliggjort.
For example, Case 125/75 Eier Kontor ν HZA Ham­
Vedrørende spørgsmålet om forholdet mellem den almindelige beslutning og de individuelle beslutninger har Domstolen — i Kruppsagen — og i lighed med sin tidligere praksis udtalt at man i et søgsmål om annulation af en individuel beslutning kun kan påberåbe sig ugyldigheden af visse bestemmelser i den generelle beslutning, dersom den individuelle beslutning er udstedt på grundlag af den bestemmelse, der påstås ulovlig.
The Court also held that the standstill clause in Article 71 does not represent an uncondi­tional obligation upon the Member States such as to confer rights on individuals, and that Article 106(3) is inapplicable to the re­exportation of a sum of money previously imported by a non-resident national in order to make commercial purchases but found not to be needed because the purchases were not made.
Procedurens indledning som sådan og meddelelsen af klagepunkter er kun et led i sagens forberedelse, og kan derfor ikke som sådan gøres til genstand for et annullationssøgsmål.
Court of Justice the United Kingdom, being purely specula­tive, could not benefit from MCAs since they were fraudulent or at least an abuse of Community law.1
Hvad særlig angår kapitalbevægelser og pengeoverførsler, som medlemsstaterne ikke er for pligtet til at frigive i henhold til EF-reglerne, ind skrænker disse ikke medlemsstaternes ret til at træffe kontrolforanstaltninger og til at kræve dem overholdt under strafansvar.
It held, moreover, that the plea of discrimination could not be accepted in the context of the common organization of a market, based on freedom of transactions as part of a common system of producer prices.
Den fælles landbrugspolitik
Common fisheries policy
Med hensyn til etableringsret har Dom stolen afsagt en dom '), som for første gang for tolker Rådets direktiv 75/362 om gensidig anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser, certifikater og an dre kvalifikationsbeviser for læger omfattende foranstaltninger, som skal lette den faktiske udøvelse af retten til etablering og fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser.
The Court was again asked for a ruling on whether fishery conservation meas­ures applied to Spanish fishing vessels were compatible with international law.