natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Denne ordning, som Fællesskabet allerede vedtog i I967» er oprindelig historisk begrundet, da der i de fleste sukkerproducerende medlemsstater inden dette tidspunkt fandtes prisordninger og produktionskvoteringer på nationalt plan.
This system, which the Community adopted in 1967, has its historical justification in the fact that most of the producer Member States had previously been applying, at national level, price systems with quantitative restrictions on production.
Desuden er den en følge af, at der tidligere mellem medlemsstaterne var en forskel i sukkerprisen på op til 30$.
The Community system was derived from a pre-existing situation in which the price of sugar in one Member State could differ by 3 0% from that in another Member State.
For at opnå en for Fællesskabet acceptabel balance mellem de politiske, landbrugsvidenskabelige og sociale krav om at opretholde produktionen af sukkerroer og sukker i områder med høje priser, som f.eks. Italien, og kravene om en styring af produktionen specielt i områder med lave priser, som f.eks.
To achieve an acceptable balance between the political, agricultural and social factors involved in maintaining sugar beet and sugar production both in high-price regions (such as Italy) and low-price regions with restrictions on production (such as Northern France), the Community adopted a quota system in preference to one in which prices would have been the sole means of controlling production.
Nordfrankrig, opgav Fællesskabet derefter at regulere produktionen alene over priserne og vedtog en kvotaordning.
A lesser price guarantee (financed by a production levy on producers) covered a quantity which could vary from one year to another (B quota) .
Denne ordning indebar garanterede priser, der var en del højere end de priser, der ville kunne opnås uden en sådan kvotering, men samtidig var denne fulde garanti kvantitativt begrænset til basiskvoten (A-kvota).
This Β quota would be a percentage of the A quota and would depend on the opportunities for exports to non-member countries.
Denne produktionsordning, der oprindelig var fastsat for 7 produktionsår (fra 1968/69 til 1974/75)» blev videreført på omtrent de samme vilkår i yderligere 5 produktionsår og udløb den 30. juni I98O.
This production system, which was initially intended to last seven years (from 1968/69 to 1974/75) , was continued in the same form for a further five years and came to an end on 3 0 June 1980.
Det har imidlertid vist sig nødvendigt at træffe fælles foranstaltninger vedrørende produktionen af isoglucose (glucosesirup med et stort indhold af fructose), der hidtil i Fællesskabet udelukkende er blevet fremstillet af majs.
In the meantime, it had proved necessary to adopt common measures on Community production of isoglucose (glucose syrup with a high fructose content) , which has so far been derived only from maize.
Da der for hver mængde isoglucose, som produceres i Fællesskabet, nødvendigvis må eksporteres en tilsvarende mængde sukker (saccharose) til tredjelande, er det nødvendigt og naturligt, at man for at opnå en ensartet behandling af sukker og isoglucose og for i en situation præget af overskud at kunne regulere denne nye produktion, lægger en del af omkostningerne i forbindelse med afsætningen af overskuddene over på isoglucose.
Since the production of any quantity of isoglucose in the Community means that a corresponding quantity of sugar (sucrose) has to be exported to non-member countries, it was necessary and normal, to ensure equal treatment of isoglucose and sugar and to control this new form of production in view of the sugar surplus, and to adopt measures whereby isoglucose manufacturers would also share responsibility for the costs of surplus disposal.
Til afløsning af en simpel afgiftsordning indførte Fælles skabet fra juli 1979 således en lignende kvotaordning for isoglucose som for sukker.
After first introducing simple tax arrangements, the Community introduced, with effect from July 1979, production quotas for isoglucose similar to those for sugar.
Denne ordning udløb ligeledes den 30. juni I980.
This quota system also came to an end on 3 0 June 1980.
Det bør endelig erindres, at Fællesskabet ved protokol nr. 3» der danner bilag til Lomé-konventionen, forpligtede sig til fra den 28. februar
Lastly, mention should be made of the commitments under Protocol 3 to the Lomé Convention , by which the Community undertook, as from 28 February 1975, to import from certain ACP countries (African, Caribbean and Pacific countries) which had signed the Convention some 1.3 million tonnes of sugar (white value) in each delivery period of 12 months.
Det er på denne baggrund Fællesskabet har måttet nyformulere sin fremtidige politik vedrørende sødemidler (roe- og rørsukker eller sacharose og sukker af majs eller isoglucose) under hensyntagen til tidligere erfaringer og den konstaterede og forventede produktions-, forbrugs- og markedsudvikling.
Thus, the Community was once again confronted with the need to redefine its policy on sugar (beet and cane sugar, or sucrose, and maize sugar, or isoglucose), bearing in mind its past experience and the current and foreseeable trends in production, consumption and market outlets.
Dette er netop sket, idet landbrugsministrene den 30. juni I98I i Rådet har godkendt den seneste række forslag desangående fra Kommissionen, dog med visse væsentlige ændringer, der imidlertid ikke er af principiel art.
On 3 0 June 1981 the Council of Ministers of Agriculture accepted the latest set of Commission proposals for such a redefinition of policy, with certain amendments which were important but not fundamental.
Inden der foretages en detaljeret gennemgang af produktionsordningen for 1981/82 til 1985/86, vil det være nyttigt at skitsere den tidligere ord ning i store træk og at foretage en kort analyse af markedsudviklingen i Fællesskabet og på verdensplan.
Before any examination of the production system adopted for the period from 1981/82 to 1985/86, it is worth recalling the main features of the previous system and to give a short analysis of the trends on the Community and world markets.
*) Ændret til protokol nr. 7, der danner bilag til den anden Lomé-konven-tion af 31. oktober 1979.
This became Protocol 7 to the Second Lomé Convention of 31 October 1979.
I. DEN TIDLIGERE ORDNING
I. THE PREVIOUS SYSTEM
De indtil den 30. juni I980 gældende regler, der forlængedes til den 30 juni I98I, omfattede, hvad sukker angår, en prisordning samt produktionskvotering.
The legislation which was in force until 3 0 June 1980, and the validity of which was extended until 3 0 June 1981, comprised both a price system and a system of production quotas for sugar.
Prisordningen omfattede for sukker en tærskelpris, en indikativpris og regionale interventionspriser, og for sukkerroer minimumspriser, der ligeledes var regionale.
The price system provided for a threshold price, a target price and regional intervention prices for sugar, together with minimum regional prices for beet.
Prisniveauet sikredes ved importafgifter, eksportrestitutioner og obligatoriske interventionsopkøb, hvortil der var knyttet en udligningsordning for lageromkostninger.
Price levels were safeguarded by means of import levies, export refunds and an obligation to buy into intervention, together with arrangements for the equalization of storage costs.
Kvoteringsordningen for sukker blev etableret på grundlag af en basismængde, som hver medlemsstat fik tildelt, og som denne derefter fordelte mellem sukkerfabrikkerne som basiskvoter (A-kvoter); disse androg i alt 9 136 000 t hvidt sukker (De Ni).
The production quotas for sugar took the form of a basic quantity fixed for each Member State and allocated by the latter amongst the sugar undertakings as the basic or A quota; in all, these quotas totalled 9 13 6 000 t of white sugar (Community of the Nine) .
Ud over A-kvoten fik hver fabrikant en B-kvota, der for I980/8I fastsattes til 27,5$ af A-kvoten.
In addition to the A quota, each manufacturer received a B quota, which in 1980/81 corresponded to 27.5% of the A quota.
For produktion af A + B-sukker var der pris- og afsætningsgaranti, men der opkrævedes en produktionsafgift for B-sukker, således at producenterne var med til at bære omkostningerne ved afsætningen af overskuddene.
Sugar produced within the A and B quotas enjoyed price and marketing guarantees but the B sugar was subject to a production levy whereby producers contributed to meeting the cost of surplus disposal.
Siden 1975/76 har denne afgift højst kunnet udgøre 30$ ' af interventionsprisen.
Since 1975/76, the maximum levy has been 3 0% of the intervention price (1).
Enhver produktion ud over kvoterne, dvs. C-sukker, skulle eksporteres af producenten for egen regning.
Any sugar produced outside the quotas (C sugar) had to be exported by the producer at his own expense.
Kvotaordningen indebar, at hver virksomhed umiddelbart fik tildelt en A-kvota; i alt omfattede disse kvoter 147 127 t isoglucose omregnet til tørstof.
The quota system provided for the direct allocation of an A quota to each undertaking; these quotas totalled 147 127 tonnes of isoglucose (dry matter).
Som for sukker var der ud over A-kvoten fastsat en B-kvota, der udgjorde 27,5$ af A-kvoten.
As in the case of sugar, each manufacturer also received a B quota amounting to 27.5% of the A quota.
Den isoglucose, der produceredes ud over maksimalkvoten, skulle eksporteres til tredjelande for producentens regning.
Any isoglucose produced outside the maximum quota had to be exported to third countries at the producer's expense.
1) Den øvre grænse var fra 1968/69 til 1974/75 fastsat til 40$. 2) For 1979/80 var produktionsafgiften for isoglucose 4»86$ ECU for 100 kg tørstof.
(1) The maximum levy was 40% between 1968/69 and 1974/75.
MARKEDSSITUATIONEN I FÆLLESSKABET
THE SITUATION ON COMMUNITY MARKETS (2)
Udviklingen efter 1975 kan i vid udstrækning forklares ud fra knapheden på verdensmarkedet og EF-markedet i 1973/74 og 1974/75· I disse to år lå produktionen i Fællesskabet på omkring 9»0 mio t, mens efterspørgslen, der stimuleredes af den eksterne og interne knaphed, i 1973/74 nåede op på 10,4 mio t. Under disse omstændigheder besluttede man at yde tilskud til import i 1974/75» og der blev truffet foranstaltninger til fremme af produktionen i 1975/76 og produktionen i de følgende produktionsår (EF-prisen forhøjedes med 15$, A-kvoten forhøjedes, med 16$, B-kvoten fastsattes til 45$ af A-kvoten osv.).
In those two years, Community production was around 9.0 million tonnes, whilst demand, stimulated by the internal and external shortage, reached 10.4 million tonnes in 1973/74. This being the case, import subsidies were introduced for 1974/ 75 and incentives to production were brought in for 1975/76 and subsequent years (EEC price increased by 15%; A quotas increased by 16%; Β quotas set at 45% of A quota, etc.).
Som en følge af disse foranstaltninger udvidede sukkerroeproducenterne det dyrkede areal med 19$» men på grund af et ringe hektarudhytte i 1975 og I976 nåede sukkerproduktionen dog ikke op på 10 mio t.
Following these measures, the area under sugar beet increased by 19%. Because of the poor yield per hectare in 1975 and 1976, however, sugar production remained below 10 million tonnes.
Fra 1977 til 1979 ændrede verdensmarkedssituationen sig totalt, hvad der medførte en indskrænkning af det tilsåede areal i overskudsområderne i Frankrig, Tyskland, Danmark og Nederlandene (manglende interesse for at producere sukkerroer med henblik på fremstilling af C-sukker).
From 1977 to 1979, the situation on the world market changed completely, resulting in less sugar beet being sown in the surplus areas of France, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands (no incentive to produce beet for processing into C sugar).
I de øvrige områder, hvor kvoternes størrelse gjorde det muligt, fortsatte man med at udvide arealet.
In other regions, where the level of the quotas made it possible, growers continued to expand the areas under beet.
I 1977/78, 1978/79, I979/8O og 1980/81 nåede sukkerproduktionen som følge af gode høstudbytter op på henholdsvis 11,5, 11,8, 12,3 og 12,1 mio t, dvs. i gennemsnit 124$ af forbruget.
In 1977/78, 1978/79, 1979/80 and 1980/81, excellent yields enabled sugar production to reach 11.5, 11.8, 12.3 and 12.1 million tonnes respectively, that is, 124% of consumption on average.
I slutningen af 1974 blev det fremtidige normalforbrug anslået til lCtø mio t under hensyn til den tidligere stigningstakt og til efterspørgslen i 1973/74 (10,4 mio t).
(1) In 1979/80, the production levy for isoglucose was 4.86 ECU per 100 kg (dry matter) .
Når der yderligere tages højde for præferenceindførslerne af sukker fra AVS-landene (1,3 mio t), har Fællesskabet 3,3 mio t sukker til rådighed for eksport til verdensmarkedet.
At the end of 1974, future consumption in a normal year was estimated at 10.4 million t, account being taken of the rate of increase in the past and the level of demand in 1973/74 (10.4 million t).
III, OVERSIGT OVER UDVIKLINGEN PÂ VERDENSMARKEDET FRA 1975 TIL 198Q1
When imports of preferential sugar from the ACP countries (1.3 million t) are taken into account, the Community has 3.3 million t for export to the world market.
Fra 1975/76 til 1978/79 skete der på verdensmarkedet samme udvikling som i EF; dvs., at produktionen hvert år oversteg forbruget.
From 1975/76 to 1978/79, the world market followed the same trend as the Community market: each year production exceeded consumption.
Indtil udgangen af 1976 blev overskuddene anvendt til at genetablere normallagre.
Until the end of 1976, the surpluses were used to rebuild carryover stocks to normal levels.
Men i 1977/78 og i 1978/79 forværredes situationen betydeligt, da verdenslagrene på grund af nye overskud pr. 1.9.1979 kom op på 31,4 mio t omregnet til råsukker, et rekordtal, der svarede til 35$ af forbruget (normalt ca. 25$).
In 1977/78 and 1978/79, however, the situation worsened considerably as new surpluses took world stocks up to 31.4 million t (raw sugar equivalent) by 1.9.1979, a record level which represented 35% of world consumption (the normal level is about 25%).
I november 1974 nåede verdensmarkedspriserne deres højeste niveau, der lå langt over EF-priserne; tolv måneder senere lå de på samme niveau som EF-priserne og faldt derefter til ca. 30 - 40$ af priserne i Fællesskabet.
In November 1974, world market prices reached their highest level, ever well above the Community price.
Indtil august 1979 har de faktiske priser svinget mellem 7 og 9 cts/lb.
Twelve months later, they were back at the same level as Community prices and subsequently fell to about 3 0-40% of Community prices.
Allerede i begyndelsen af 1980 bevirkede prisstigningen, at de lande, der havde underskrevet ISA, ikke længere overholdt eksportkvoterne, og umiddelbart efter fik verdensmarkedet tilført samtlige særlagre, lagre, der på det tidspunkt omfattede ca. 2 mio t.
The imbalance between supply and demand on the world market prevented prices from rising to the lower price level agreed
l) Jf. ligeledes de statistiske oplysninger i bilaget.
(1) See Annex for statistics.
Disse to foranstaltninger havde ingen mærkbar indflydelse på prisudviklingen.
under the International Sugar Agreement (ISA) - the price range fixed in 1977 was 11-21 cts/lb of raw sugar fob Caribbean.
Siden da har ISA ikke haft noget middel til at påvirke verdensmarkedet; der er ingen planer om igen at anvende eksportkvoter, før prisen falder til under 16 cts/lb, en situation, der ikke forekommer særlig sandsynlig på kort sigt.
In fact, prices fluctuated between 7 and 9 cts/lb until August 1979.
For at kunne bedømme prisudviklingen på længere sigt bør det imidlertid' erindres, at en analyse af verdensmarkedet siden 1900 viser, at det i 8 ud af 10 år har været præget af overskud og lave priser.
In 1979/80, after four consecutive surplus years, world consumption exceeded production by more than 5 million tonnes.
Da det samme har været tilfældet i årtierne efter I960, er der ingen grund til at tro, at det vil ændre sig.
This led to a very sharp increase in world market prices, which have been rising since May 1980 in anticipation of a further shortage in 1980/81.
Ud over en ordning for priser og samhandel, hvori der kun er sket få ændringer af mekanismerne, omfatter den nye markedsordning en produktionsordning gældende for fem produktionsår (1981/82 - I985/86, som bygger på kvoter, der ledsages af differentierede garantier. Endelig indeholder den som tidligere, men med visse tillempelser, særlige bestemmelser for præferenceindførsel af sukker og endelig generelle bestemmelser. ser.
The new arrangements, and in particular the provisions concerning production, are based on the following fundamental principles : a) production should be geared to market outlets and all losses entailed by surplus disposal should be covered by financial contributions from producers so that this sector will have a "neutral" effect on the budget; b) cane and beet producers should be assured of a fair income; c) the new arrangement should permit the Community to join the International Sugar Agreement; d) the difference between abundant harvests and poor harvests should be evened out; e) account should be taken of regional trends in beet and cane production along specialized lines; f) arrangements should be made so that the Community can fulfil its obligations as regards preferential sugar imports.
Ordningen for priser og samhandel kendetegnes stadig ved en interventionspris for hvidt sukker og råsukker; den fastsættes årligt for hvert produktionsår og gælder for de dele af Fællesskabet, hvor der findes overskud.
These were the principles which, to a great extent, guided the Community in adopting the provisions applicable to production with effect from 1 July 1981.
Da denne regionalisering er blevet ophævet, bør der træffes særlige foranstaltninger (f.eks. i form af støtte) med henblik på afsætning af dette sukker i Fællesskabets europæiske dele.
The common organization of the market now covers both sucrose (beet and cane sugar) and its industrial substitute, isoglucose (maize sugar), although the latter is treated separately to take account of its particular nature.
En indikativpris, som ligger ca. 5$ over interventionsprisen, og tærskelpriserne, som skal sikre fællesskabspræferencen, er blevet bibeholdt.
Thus, the market in sweeteners has been formally recognized as a single market in sweeteners, in accordance with the rulings already handed down by the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Den nye markedsordning har ligeledes bevaret den tidligere såkaldte "refusionsordning for lageromkostninger", som især skal sikre regelmæssig afsætning af produktionen i produktionsårets løb, dvs. en jævn forsyning, ved hjælp af en fast godtgørelse af lageromkostningerne; modsvarende betaler fabrikanter, raffinadører og importører af præferencesukker en lagerafgift, således at godtgørelse og afgift udligner hinanden.
Apart from the price and trading system, which has undergone little alteration, the new organization comprises, for the five marketing years from 1981/82 to 1985/86, production arrangements based on quotas covered by different types of guarantee.
Hertil knytter sig for producenternes vedkommende som tidligere en for pligtelse til at holde et mindstelager af hensyn til forsyningssikkerheden. den.
Lastly, the common organization again includes, with some changes, specific provisions on preferential sugar imports, together with some provisions of a general nature.
Ordningerne vedrørende eksportrestitutioner og eksportafgifter samt importafgifter er stort set uændrede.
The price and trading system still comprises an intervention price for white sugar and for raw sugar, fixed annually for each marketing year and applicable to the surplus areas of the Community.
I det omfang, der er behov for det, kan der stadig ydes restitutioner ved eksport til tredjelande, og der kan opkræves eksportafgifter, hvis prisen på verdensmarkedet kommer op over interventionsprisen; en sådan opkrævning sker automatisk, hvis verdensprisen ligger over tærskelprisen. Også her har motiverne fortrinsvis været at undgå enhver risiko for, at forsyningerne til Fællesskabets forbrugere afbrydes, hvilket blandt andet ville kunne ske i tilfælde af knaphed på verdensmarkedet.
From these prices are derived the regional intervention prices for those parts of the Community with a sugar deficit (Italy, United Kingdom and Ireland), whereas under the previous system there was also a regional intervention price for raw cane sugar produced in the French overseas departments (Réunion, Guadeloupe and Martinique) .
Med hensyn til sukkerroer skal der ifølge den nye markedsordning hvert år fastsættes en basispris for sukkerroer.
Now that the latter arrangement has come to an end, specific measures (e.g. aid measures) will have to be adopted so that this cane sugar can be marketed in the European regions of the Community.
Denne "nyskabelse" er blevet nødvendig, fordi der som første afgift opkræves en afgift ikke blot af B-sukker som hidtil, men også og samtidigt af A-sukker.
The new system again comprises a target price, which is about 5% higher than the intervention price, and threshold prices intended to guarantee Community preference.
Basisprisen på sukkerroer benyttes som reference ved fastsættelsen af minimums pris en for A-sukkerroer og minimumsprisen for B-sukkerroer. Den første minimumspris bliver på forhånd sat til 98$ af basisprisen for A-sukkerroer og den anden til 68$ af basisprisen for B-sukkerroer.
Similarly, the new organization of the market retains the same arrangements as regards compensation for storage costs, to ensure that the sugar produced is marketed regularly throughout the year and that the continuity of supplies is ensured; storage costs are reimbursed at a standard rate and offset by the payment of a storage levy by the manufacturers, refiners and importers of preferential sugar.
Disse minimumspriser svarer til de maksimale produktionsafgifter, det vil for A-sukker sige 2$
As before, there will be a minimum stock requirement on producers to provide further security of supply.
af interventionsprisen for sukker, og for B-sukker 2$ + 30$ (altså i alt 32$) af denne interventionspris.
Lastly, recourse may be had to intervention purchases throughout the marketing year, as under the previous system, and intervention in the form of production refunds, originally reserved for sugar used in the chemical industry, will now be extended to isoglucose.
Det endelige prisniveau for sukkerroer kommer således til at afhænge af produkt i ons afgift er, som fastsættes efter regler, der gennemgås senere.
Export refunds, export levies and import levies will remain practically unchanged.
Hvis produktionsafgiftens grundstørrelse med andre ord er O bliver prisen på A- og B-sukkerroer lig med basisprisen for sukkerroer.
Refunds may still be granted where necessary on exports to third countries, whilst export levies may be applied when the world market price exceeds the intervention price and will automatically be applied when the world price exceeds the threshold price.
Den pris, som producenten får for sukker, der produceres ud over kvoten (C-sukker), afhænger af priserne på verdensmarkedet og er således ikke undergivet fællesskabsbestemmelserne, men derimod kontraktlige aftaler mellem de berørte parter.
Here again, the legislation is essentially designed to prevent any interruption of supplies to the Community consumer : this could happen if there was a shortage on the world market.
Produktionsordningen er som nævnt fastsat for fem produktionsår (1981/82 - 1985/86) for både sukker og isoglucose.
This is a new feature and was made necessary by the introduction of a levy on A sugar as well as on Β sugar, whereas in the past the levy had been charged only on Β sugar.
Kvoterne kan, hvilket er nyt, revideres for produktionsårene I984/85 og I985/86 (for både A-kvoternes og B-kvoternes vedkommende).
The basic price for sugar beet will serve as a reference mark for determining the minimum price for A beet and the minimum price for Β beet.