natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Direktivet overlader det til den ordregivende myndighed at afgøre, om den ønsker at tillade eller forbyde, at der afgives alternative bud, at fastsætte, hvilken type alternative bud den agter at tage i betragtning, samt at fastsætte, på hvilke betingelser der kan afgives alternative bud. F.eks. kunne en ordregivende myndighed forlange, at der indgives et basisbud samtidig med et alternativt bud.
The Directive leaves it to the discretion of contracting authorities to decide whether they wish to authorize or prohibit variants and to establish what type of variants they are prepared to consider and the conditions for the submission of such variants - they may, for instance, require firms to submit a basic tender along with the variant.
Hvis den ordregivende myndighed forbyder alternative bud, pålægger direktivet den ordregivende myndighed at anføre i udbudsbekendtgørelsen, at alternative bud ikke antages.
However, if they decide to prohibit variants, contracting authorities must say so in the contract notice.
Hvis alternative bud derimod kan antages, er den ordregivende myndighed ikke forpligtet til at anføre dette i udbudsbekendtgørelsen, men den skal i udbudsbetingelserne angive, hvilke minimumskrav alternative bud skal opfylde, og på hvilke betingelser de kan afgives.
Where variants are allowed, the contracting authority is not obliged to say so in the contract notice, but must mention in the contract documents the minimum conditions v/hich variants must comply with and the procedures for their submission.
Den ordregivende myndighed kan derefter kun tage de alternative bud i betragtning, der opfylder de i udbudsbetingelserne anførte minimumskrav.
Thereafter, it may take into consideration only those variants that meet the minimum requirements set out in the contract documents.
Dog kan den ikke afvise et alternativt bud alene med den begrundelse, at det er blevet udarbejdet med tekniske specifikationer, der er fastsat ved henvisning til nationale standarder, der er udtryk for gennemførelse af europæiske standarder, ved henvisning til europæiske tekniske godkendelser, ved henvisning til fælles tekniske specifikationer eller ved henvisning til nationale tekniske specifikationer, der i henhold til de procedurer, der er fastsat i EU-direktiverne om teknisk harmonisering, anerkendes som værende i
Furthermore, contracting authorities may not reject a variant on the sole grounds that it has been drawn up with technical specifications defined by reference to national standards transposing European standards, to European technical approvals, to common technical specifications or to national technical specifications recognized as complying with the essential requirements listed in the Community directives on technical harmonization, in accordance with the procedures laid down in those directives, or again by reference to national technical specifications relating to design and method of calculation and execution of works and use of materials.
overensstemmelse med de væsentlige krav, der er anført i disse direktiver, eller ved henvisning til nationale tekniske specifikationer for projektering, beregning og udførelse af bygge- og anlægsarbejder og for anvendelse af materialer.
However, to ensure transparency of the conditions under which contracts are performed, the Directive provides that, in the contract documents, the contracting authority may request the tenderer to indicate, in his tender, any share of the contract which he intends to subcontract to third parties.
Underentrepriser inden for offentlige indkøb er ikke som sådanne reguleret ved direktivet.
Groups of contractors must be allowed to submit a tender or to negotiate without having to assume a particular legal form.
For at sikre gennemsigtighed i udførelsen af kontrakter fastsættes det imidlertid i direktivet, at den ordregivende myndighed i udbudsbetingelserne kan anmode den bydende om i sit bud at angive, hvor stor en del af kontrakten han eventuelt påtænker at give i underentreprise til tredjemand.
However, a group may be required to assume a particular legal form if it is awarded the contract.
Direktivet præciserer endvidere, at denne meddelelse ikke berører hovedentreprenørens ansvar.
In such a case, the contracting authority must have indicated beforehand, in the contract notice, the legal form required.
Det skal være tilladt entreprenørkonsortier at afgive bud eller at forhandle, uden at der stilles krav om, at de skal have en bestemt retlig form.
As was pointed out in connection with the definition of the contractor (point 1.2), the Court has stated42that a company which has neither the intention nor the resources to carry out the works itself may participate in a procedure for the award of a public works contract.
Det kan imidlertid forlanges, at entreprenørkonsortier antager en bestemt retlig form, når de har fået tildelt ordren.
However, in order to prove that it has the required financial and economic standing and technical capability, it must establish that it actually has available to it the resources of the contractors by whom it intends to have the contract carried out and that those resources meet the requirements specified by the contracting authority.
I så fald skal den ordregivende myndighed på forhånd have fastsat i udbudsbekendtgørelsen, hvilken retlig form der forlanges.
6.4.4 Health and safety rules in force where the works are to be carried out
6.4.4 Gældende bestemmelser om tryghed i ansættelsen og arbejdsforhold på det sted, hvor arbejderne skal udføres
Such clauses must, of course, comply with all the relevant provisions of Community law and, in particular, with the principles of the right of establishment and the freedom to provide services, and with the prohibition on any discrimination on grounds of nationality.
De ordregivende myndigheder kan i udbudsbetingelserne oplyse eller kan af den medlemsstat, hvor de er etableret, forpligtes til at oplyse, hos hvilken eller hvilke myndigheder bydende kan få oplysning om, hvilke forpligtelser der gælder i henhold til bestemmelserne om tryghed i ansættelsen og arbejdsforhold i øvrigt i den medlemsstat, region eller lokalitet, hvor arbejderne skal udføres, og som finder anvendelse på de arbejder, der skal udføres på arbejdsstedet under kontraktens opfyldelse.
As regards, more particularly, their compatibility with Directive 93/37/EEC, such clauses must not have a direct or indirect discriminatory effect as regards tenderers from other Member States, i.e. it must not be the case, taking all the particular circumstances into account, that they can be fulfilled only by domestic tenderers or that they would be more difficult to fulfil by tenderers from other Member States.
Den ordregivende myndighed, der afgiver disse oplysninger, skal anmode entreprenørerne om at angive, at de ved udarbejdelsen af deres bud har taget hensyn til disse forpligtelser.
In addition, since these special conditions are supplementary, contracting authorities must indicate them in the contract notice so that contractors can judge whether a public contract containing such contractual clauses is of interest to them.44
Domstolens dom af 20.9.1988 i sag 31/87, anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse, Gebroeders Beentjes B.V. mod Nederlandene, Sml. 1988, s. 4635.
Case C-389/92 Ballast Nedam Groep NV ν Belgian State [1994] ECR 1-1289.
For en mere tilbundsgående analyse af denne retspraksis og dens anvendelsesmuligheder, se meddelelse fra Kommissionen af 22. september 1989 om "Offentlige kontrakter - regionale og sociale aspekter" (EFT C 3 11 af 12.12.1989, s. 7).
For a fuller analysis of the case-law and its possible applications, see the Commission communication of 22 September 1989 on Public procurement: Regional and social aspects (OJNo C 311, 12.12.1989, p. 7).
Det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud
6.5.1 Award criteria
Kriteriet om det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud kræver derimod en nærmere præcise ring.
The criteria on which contracting authorities base the award of contracts must be either the lowest price or the most economically advantageous tender.
Problemet består i at afgøre, hvilke elementer der skal være bestemmende for, hvilket bud der er det økonomisk mest fordelagtige.
This criterion is not difficult to apply, since only the price requested by tenderers is to be taken into consideration and the contract must be awarded to the tenderer asking the lowest price.
Med henblik herpå anfører direktivet, at de ordregivende myndigheder kan anvende "forskellige kriterier, der varierer efter kontrakten, f.eks. pris, udførelsesfrist, driftsomkostninger, rentabilitet, teknisk værdi".
Where contracting authorities resort to this award criterion, they must say so: in the contract notice in the case of open procedures; in the contract notice or the invitation to tender in the case of restricted procedures.
Der tillades variation i kriterierne for at tage højde for de forskel lige krav, som stilles af forskellige arbejder og deres anvendelsesformål, som dette er fastlagt af den ordregivende myndighed.
What constitutes the most economically advantageous tender, however, requires further clarification.
Hvert enkelt kriterium, som den ordregivende myndighed agter at lægge til grund for bestemmelsen af, hvilket bud der er det økonomisk mest fordelagtige, skal angives i udbudsbekendtgørelsen eller i udbudsbetingelserne.
This list is not exhaustive. It is clear from the examples given, though, that the most economically advantageous tender can only be decided on objective grounds, equally applicable to all tenders and strictly related to the subject of the contract.
Kriterier, som ikke er blevet offentliggjort, vil ikke kunne anvendes ved udvælgelsen af det økonomisk mest fordelagtige bud.
Variation is allowed, to reflect the inherent requirements of the different works to be carried out and their purpose, as laid down by the contracting authority.
Direktivet anfører endvidere, at kriterierne så vidt muligt skal anføres efter den betydning, som den ordregivende myndighed tillægger dem, med det vigtigste først.
In accordance with the Court's judgment in Beentjes,45the Directive gives contracting authorities a power of assessment, which must be used solely to determine the most economically advantageous tender on the basis of objective criteria such as those listed by way of example in the Directive, any arbitrary criterion being prohibited.
Men alt efter omstændighederne træder det ene eller det andet kriterium i forgrunden.
This obligation to publish would not be met - as the Court made clear in Beentjes - by a general reference to a provision of national law.
Hvis der f.eks. er tale om at bygge en bro, kan rækkefølgen af kriterierne være følgende:
Criteria which have not been stated may not be used to select the tender.
teknisk værdi (soliditet, modstandsdygtighed over for jordbundsforskydninger, elasticitet osv.) anlægsomkostninger æstetisk værdi.
Case 31/87 Beentjes ν Netherlands State [1988] ECR 4635.
Domstolens dom af 20.9.1988 i sag 31/87, anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse, Gebroeders Beentjes B.V. mod Nederlandene, Sml. 1988, s. 4635.
While in some cases it may be difficult to rank the criteria in this way, in others one criterion will be uppermost.
Af den grund skal de ordregivende myndigheder så vidt muligt meddele virksomhederne kriteriernes rangorden, så disse er klar over, på hvilket grundlag deres bud vil blive vurderet46.
Whenever possible, authorities should specify how criteria are ranked so that contractors know on what basis their bids will be assessed.46
6.5.2 Undtagelse
6.5.2 Exception
Der kan undtagelsesvis lægges andre kriterier til grund for tildelingen af ordrer end de to ovenfor nævnte kriterier, når dette sker inden for rammerne af bestemmelser, der var i kraft på tidspunktet for direktivets vedtagelse, og som har til formål at give visse bydende en fortrinsstilling, forudsat at de bestemmelser, der gøres gældende, er forenelige med traktaten.
By way of exception, the Directive allows a contract to be awarded on criteria other than price and economic advantage in accordance with rules that were already in force when the Directive was adopted and were designed to give preference to certain bidders; such rules must, of course, be compatible with the Treaty.
De bestemmelser, der her sigtes på, er nationale bestemmelser, som i forbindelse med ordretildelingen efter forskellige systemer (f.eks. ved prislighed eller ækvivalens mellem de afgivne bud) giver en fortrinsstilling til virksomheder, der har bestemte karakteristika.
These are national rules which, under certain conditions (e.g. where prices are equal or tenders equivalent), provide for contracts to be awarded preferentially to enterprises displaying certain characteristics.
Denne fortrinsstilling er kun lovlig, hvis den tildeles alle virksomheder, der - uanset hvilken region af EU de er etableret i - har de samme karakteristika.
Such preference is lawful only if it is extended to all enterprises anywhere in the Community which display the same characteristics.
Det skal præciseres, at denne bestemmelse, som udelukkende vedrører en fortrinsstilling, der gives for at favorisere en bestemt kategori af virksomheder, ikke må forveksles med præferencer, der gives under de regionale præferenceordninger47, der udløb den 31. december 1992.
This exception, which covers only preferences granted for the purpose of promoting certain categories of enterprise, should not be confused with the exception granted in respect of regional preference schemes,47 which expired on 31 December 1992.
Unormalt lave bud
6.5.3 Abnormally low tenders
En ordregivende myndighed, der modtager bud, som forekommer at være unormalt lave i forhold til ydelsen, kan ikke uden videre afvise sådanne bud.
Where a contracting authority receives tenders which seem to it to be abnormally low in relation to the transaction, it may not automatically reject them.
Direktivet præciserer, hvilke begrundelser den ordregivende myndighed kan tage hensyn til, nemlig påviste besparelser ved byggeprocessen eller de benyttede tekniske løsninger, den bydendes usædvanligt gunstige betingelser for at udføre arbejdet eller projektets originalitet.
Before it can do so, the authority is required by the Directive to request in writing from the tenderer concerned all details of the constituent elements of the tender which it considers relevant and to verify those constituent elements taking account of the explanations received from the tenderer.
Konklusioner fra det 10. møde i Det Rådgivende Udvalg for Offentlige Aftaler afholdt den 25., 26. og 27. april 1977.
Conclusions of the 10th meeting of the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts, held on 25-27 April 1977.
Dette punkt er eksplicit blevet fastslået af Domstolen48.
If this procedure is not applied, no tender may be rejected because it is alleged to be abnormally low.
"Den omstændighed, at der ved denne bestemmelse" - artikel 29, stk. 5, i direktiv 71/305/EØF49- "udtrykkeligt er givet den ordregivende myndighed beføjelse til eventuelt at afvise de fremlagte bevisligheder, er imidlertid på ingen måde ensbetydende med ... at den hermed også uden videre kan forkaste tilbuddet og ikke behøver at anmode den bydende om at fremlægge dokumentation.
This point was explained by the Court in the following terms:48 "the fact that the provision (Article 29(5) of Directive 71/305/EEC49) expressly empowers the awarding authority to establish whether the explanations are acceptable does not under any circumstances authorize it to decide in advance, by rejecting the tender without even seeking an explanation from the tenderer, that no acceptable explanation could be given.
Formålet med denne bestemmelse, som er at beskytte den bydende mod vilkårlighed fra den oraregivende myndigheds side, vil ikke kunne opfyldes, såfremt man overlader det til denne at skønne, om det er hensigtsmæssigt at anmode om fremlæggelse af dokumentation. "
The aim of the provision, which is to protect tenderers against arbitrariness on the part of the authority awarding contracts, could not be achieved if it were left to that authority to judge whether or not it was appropriate to seek explanations".
I henhold til dommen er den ordregivende myndighed forpligtet til at give den bydende rimelig frist til at fremlægge dokumentation.
In accordance with this ruling, the contracting authority is obliged to allow the tenderer a reasonable period of time in which to submit his explanations.
Domstolen50har endvidere præciseret, at den præcise og detaljerede procedure for efter prøvning af bud, der forekommer at være unormalt lave, foreskrives af direktivet for at give bydende, der har afgivet usædvanligt lave bud, lejlighed til at bevise, at deres bud er seriøse, og for at sikre konkurrence om offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter.
The Court held in another judgment50that the precise, detailed procedure for examining tenders which seemed to be abnormally low was laid down by the Directive to enable bidders who had put in particularly low tenders to show that these were serious and to open up public works contracts.
Den statuerede således, at "artikel 29, stk. 5, i direktiv 71/305/EØF ... indeholder et forbud mod, at medlemsstaterne indfører bestemmelser, hvorefter visse efter et matematisk kriterium bedømte tilbud ex officio udelukkes fra at komme i betragtning ved en licitationsprocedure, således at den ordregivende myndighed ikke er forpligtet til at følge den i direktivet fastlagte procedure om en gennemgang af buddene med adgang for byderne til at fremsætte bemærkninger".
The Court ruled therefore that: "Article 29(5) of Council Directive 71/305/EEC prohibits Member States from introducing provisions which require the automatic disqualification from award of public works contracts of certain tenders determined according to a mathematical criterion, instead of obliging the awarding authority to apply the examination procedure which is provided under the Directive".
Domstolen statuerede endvidere efter eksplicit at have fast slået, at den pågældende bestemmelse i direktivet var ubetinget og tilstrækkelig præcis til at kunne påberåbes ved de nationale domstole, at "en forvaltning, herunder en kommunalforvaltning, ligesom de nationale domstole er forpligtet til at anvende bestemmelserne i direktivets artikel 29, stk. 5, og undlade at anvende de bestemmelser i national ret, der ikke er i overensstemmelse med denne direktivbestemmelse".
Having explained that the provision in question in the Directive was unconditional and sufficiently precise to be relied on before national courts, the Court also ruled that "an administrative authority, including a municipal authority, is under the same obligation as a national court to apply the provisions of Article 29(5) of Council Directive 71/305 and to refrain from applying such provisions of national law as are inconsistent with them".
Endvidere skal den ordregivende myndighed, hvis ordretildelingskriteriet er den laveste pris, meddele Kommissionen, at den har afvist bud, som den finder for lave.
If the criterion for awarding the contract is the lowest price, the contracting authority must inform the Commission of any tenders which it rejects as too low.
I denne situation afvises således bud, som, hvis deres pris havde været korrekt fastsat, ville opfylde det kriterium, der er fastsat for tildeling af kontrakten.
In such cases, the tenders excluded would, if correctly priced, satisfy the criterion laid down for winning the contract.
Af den grund er det overordentlig vigtigt at sikre størst mulig gennemsigtighed og give Kommissionen lejlighed til i givet fald at kontrollere, om prisen virkelig var unormalt lav og derfor uacceptabel.
Consequently, it is particularly important to ensure maximum transparency and to allow the Commission to verify, where appropriate, whether the price was indeed abnormally low and therefore unacceptable.
Domstolens dom af 10.9.1982 i sag 76/81, anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse, S.A. Transporoute et travaux publics mod Ministère de Travaux Publics i Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg, Sml. 1982, s. 417.
Case 76/81 Transporoute ν Minister of Public Works [ 1982] ECR 417.
Artikel 29, stk. 5, i direktiv 71/305/EØF svarer til artikel 30, stk. 5, i det kodificerede bygge- og anlægsdirektiv.
Article 29(5) of Directive 71/305/EEC corresponds to Article 30(5) of the consolidated Works Directive.
Underretning af afviste bydende
6.5.4 Notification of unsuccessful tenderers
Denne underretning skal ske senest 15 dage efter modtagelse af anmodningen.
The contracting authority must, within 15 days of the date on which the request is received, inform any unsuccessful tenderer who so requests of the reasons for rejection of his tender and the name of the successful bidder.
For hver ordre, de tildeler, skal de ordregivende myndigheder udarbejde en rapport, som i sin helhed eller i hovedtræk skal meddeles Kommissionen efter anmodning fra denne.
For each contract they award, contracting authorities must draw up a report, the full text or main points of which must be communicated to the Commission at its request.
Denne rapport skal mindst indeholde følgende oplysninger: den ordregivende myndigheds navn og adresse, kontraktens genstand og værdi navnet på de valgte ansøgere eller bydende og en begrundelse for dette valg navnet på de afviste ansøgere eller bydende og en begrundelse for denne afvisning navnet på den valgte entreprenør og en begrundelse for valget af hans bud samt hvor stor en del af kontrakten entreprenøren har til hensigt at give i underentreprise til tredjemand, hvis denne kendes ved udbud efter forhandling, en redegørelse for de omstændigheder, der begrunder brug af disse procedurer.
The report must contain at least: the name and address of the contracting authority, the subject and value of the contract; the names of the candidates or tenderers selected, with reasons; the names of the candidates or tenderers rejected, with reasons; the name of the successful tenderer and the reasons why his tender was chosen and, if known, any share of the contract which the tenderer intends to subcontract to third parties; for negotiated procedures, the circumstances justifying the use of the procedure.
BYGGE­
Page 69
KONCESSIONSKONTRAKTER ANLÆGSARBEJDER
PUBLIC WORKS CONCESSIONS
Koncessionskontrakter om offentlige bygge­ og anlægsarbejder er på grund af deres særlige karakter kun underlagt en række offentliggørelsesregler, der sigter mod at tilveje­bringe en vis grad af gennemsigtighed på området.
In view of their specific nature, public works concessions are subject only to advertising rules designed to introduce some transparency in this field.
Koncessionsgiveren kan således frit vælge procedure (f.eks. at forhandle) ved udarbej­delsen af de kvalitative krav, som ansøgerne skal opfylde, og ved fastsættelsen af de kriterier, han agter at lægge til grund for tildelingen af koncessionskontrakten.
The authority granting the concession is thus free to choose the procedure (it can, for example, negotiate with prospective concessionaires), to set the level of the qualitative requirements to be met by candidates and to establish the criteria for awarding the concession.
Det skal dog understreges, at denne valgfrihed ikke er ubetinget. Grænserne for den følger af traktatens regler, bl.a. principperne om etableringsfrihed og fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser samt forbud mod enhver form for nationalitetsbegrundet forskelsbehandling.
The authority granting the concession does not have unlimited freedom, however: it has to observe the rules enshrined in the Treaty, in particular those concerning the right of establishment and the freedom to provide services and the ban on discrimination on grounds of nationality.
Imidlertid skal det bemærkes, at de oplysninger, der offentliggøres i henhold til direktivets offentliggørelsesregler, uvægerligt har konsekvenser for proceduren for tildeling af en koncessionskontrakt.
It should also be borne in mind that the advertising rules laid down by the Directive have inevitable repercussions on the procedures for awarding the concession.